HomeMy WebLinkAbout6281 - ADMIN Resolution - City Council - 1979/06/18RESOLUTION NO. 6281
A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCE IN SIDE YARD AND
REAR YARD SETBACK FROM SECTION 14-128 OF THE
ORDINANCE CODE RELATING TO ZONING TO PERMIT
CONSTRUCTION OF AN EXPANSION IN THE R-1, SINGLE
FAMILY DISTRICT, AT 2520 BOONE AVENUE SOUTH
BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of St. Louis Park, Minnesota:
Findings
1. Charles B. Desnick has applied for a variance from Section 14-128 of
the Ordinance Code relating to zoning to permit a side yard of three feet
instead of the required six feet and a rear yard of seventeen feet instead
of the required 35 feet for a single family house located in the R-1, Single
Family District, at the following location, to -wit:
Lot 24, Block 1, Cedar Knoll Manor
2. The Board of Zoning Appeals has reviewed the application for a'
variance (Case No. 79 -33 -VAR) and has made its recommendation to the'City
Council.
3. The Council has considered the effect of the proposed variance upon
the health, safety, and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated
traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, -risk to the public safety,
the effect on values of property in the surrounding area and the effect of the
proposed variance upon the Comprehensive Plan.
4. Because of conditions on the subject pronerty and on the surrounding
property, it is possible to use the subject property in such a way that the
proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to
adjacent property, unreasonably increase the congestion in the public streets,
increase the danger of fire, endanger the public safety, unreasonably diminish
or impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other resaect be contrary
to the intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive PTan.
5. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question
are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property and do not
apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which such land
is located.
6. The granting of the application is necessary'for the preservation and
enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. It will not merely
serve as a. convenience to the applicant but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable
hardship or difficulty.
Conclusion
The application for a variance for the purpose designated is granted, based
upon the findings set forth above.
ATTEST:
Reviewed for administration:
Adopted by the City Council June 18, 1979
Mayo
Approved as to form and legality:
City ttorney