HomeMy WebLinkAbout5637 - ADMIN Resolution - City Council - 1976/11/15NOVEMBER 15, 1976
RESOLUTION NO. 5637
A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCE IN SIDE YARD AND
REAR YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FROM SECTIONS
14-173(2) AND 14-173(6) OF THE ORDINANCE CODE
(6:144.2 and 6:144.6, Zoning Ordinance) RELATING
TO ZONING TO PERMIT A SIDEYARD ON A STREET OF
ZERO FEET AND A REAR YARD OF FIVE FEET IN THE
I-1 DISTRICT AT 5806 WEST 36 STREET
,BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of St. Louis Park:
Findings
1. Top Value Auto Supply, Inc., has applied for a variance from
Section'14-173(2) and Section 14-173(6) of the Ordinance Code relating to
zoning to permit a side yard of zero feet and a rear yard of five feet for
an office -warehouse building located in the I-1 District at the following
location, to -wit:
Lots 8, 9 and 10, Block 29, St. Louis Park,
commonly known as 5806 West 36 Street
2. The Board of Appeals has reviewed the application for a variance
(Case No. 76 -70 -VAR) and has recommended to the City Council that the
application be granted.
3. The Council has considered the,effect of the proposed variance upon
the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated
traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety,
and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area and the effect
of the proposed variance upon the Comprehensive Plan.
4. Because of conditions on the subject property and on the surrounding
property, it is possible to use the subject property in such a way that the
proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent
property, unreasonably increase the congestion in the public streets, increase
the danger of fire, endanger the public safety, unreasonably diminish or impair
health, safety, comfort, morals, or in ary other respect be contrary to the
intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan.
5. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question
are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property and do not
apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which such land
is located.
6. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and
enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. It will not merely
serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable
hardship or difficulty.
Conclusion
The application for a variance for the purpose designated is granted based upon
the findings set forth above.
Attest:
ity Clerk
Reviewed administration:
Adopted by the City Council November 15, .1 7
C
y
Mayor
Approved as to form and legality.
�l
City Attorney
-2-
5057