Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout5635 - ADMIN Resolution - City Council - 1976/11/15NOVEMBER 15, 1976 s° RESOLUTION NO. 5636 A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCE IN REAR YARD FROM SECTION 14-130(5) OF THE ORDINANCE CODE (6:064.5, Zoning Ordinance) RELATING TO ZONING TO PERMIT A REAR YARD OF 12 FEET IN THE R-1 DISTRICT AT 4248 YOSEMITE AVENUE BE, IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of St. Louis Park: s Findings 1. Gordon Ess has applied fora var'4ance from Section 14-130(5) of the Ordinance Code relating to zoning to permit a 12 -foot rear yard for a single- family house located in the R-1 District at the following location, to -wit: That part of Lot 6, Block 7, Brookside Addition, lying north of the south 200 feet thereof, commonly known as 4248 Yosemite Avenue 2. The Board of Zonng Appeals has reviewed the application for a variance (Case No. 76 -75 -VAR) and has recomended to the City Council that the application be' granted. 3. The Council has considered the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing aid anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area and the effect of the proposed variance upon the Comprehensive Plan. 4. Because of conditions on the subject property and on the surrounding property, it is possible to use the subject property in such a way that the proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, unreasonably increase the congestion in the public streets, increase the danger of fire, endanger the public safety, unreasonably diminish or impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. 5. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property and do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district iinn_which such land is located. 6. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a 'substantial property right of the applicant. It will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty. Conclusion The application for a variance for the purpose designated is granted, based upon the, findings set forth above. Adopted by the City Council November 15, 197 AttEst: 4Jk1 Reviewe i ty-lol ministration: -2- Mayor Approved as to form and legality: 7. City At orney 56 3(0 . n NOVEMBER 15, 1976 i RESOLUTION NO. 5635 A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCE IN REAR YARD SETBACK FROM SECTIONS 14-128(4) AND 14-128(5) OF THE ORDINANCE CODE RELATING TO ZONING TO PERMIT A REAR YARD OF 10 FEET IN THE -R-1 DISTRICT AT 4123 SUNSET BOULEVARD BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of St. Louis Park: Findings 1: Richard J. Goodkind has applied for a variance from Sections 14-128(4) and 14-128(5) of the Ordinance Code relating to zoning to permit a rear yard of 10 feet,for a single-family house located in the R-1 District at the following location, to -wit: Lots 1 and 2, except the easterly 55 feet thereof, Block 3, Sunset Gables Second Division, commonly known as 4123 Sunset Boulevard. 2. The Board of Zoning Appears has reviewed the application for a variance (Case No. 76 -69 -VAR) and its action has been reported to the City Council. 3. The Council has considered the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area and the effect of the proposed variance upon the Comprehensive Plan. 4. Because of conditions on the subject property and on the surrounding property, it is possible to use the subject property in such_a-way that the pro- posed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to ad,iacent property, unreasonably increase the congestion in the public streets, increase the danger, of fire, endanger the public safety, unreasonably diminish or impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. 5. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property and do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which such land is located. A 6. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicdnt. It will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrdble hardship or difficulty. Conclusion The ipp)ication for a variance for the purpose designated is granted, based upon the findings set forth above. Adopted by the City Council November 15 1976. Attest: ity C erk Review ministration: Mayor Approved as to form and legality: City A'Ctorney -2- 5435