HomeMy WebLinkAbout5560 - ADMIN Resolution - City Council - 1976/07/19r=te
JULY 19, 1976
RESOLUTION NO. 5560
A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCE IN SIDE AND REAR
YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FROM SECTION 6:064.5
OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO PERMIT A SIDE YARD
OF ONE FOOT AND REAR YARD QF 22 FEET FOR A
SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE LOCATED IN THE R-1 SINGLE
FAMILY DISTRICT AT 4340 BROOK LANE
BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of St. Loui$ Park, Minnesota:
Findings
1. Larry Krug has applied for a variance from Section 6:064.5 of the
Zoning Ordinance to permit a side yard of one foot and a rear yard of 22 feet
for a single family\house located in the R-1 Single Family District at the
following location, to -wit:
the southerly 90 feet of the easterly 126 feet of Lot 12,
Block 1, Brookside Second Addition, commonly known as
4340 Brook Lane
2. The Board of Appeals has reviewed the application for a variance
(Case No. 76 -34 -VAR), and has recommended to the City Council that the
application be granted.
3. The Council has considered the effect of the proposed variance upon
the health, safety, and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated
traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety,
and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area and the effect of
the proposed variance upon the Comprehensive Plan.
4. Because of conditions on the subject property and on the surrounding
property, it is possible to use the subject property in such a way that the
proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent
property, unreasonably increase the congestion in the public streets, increase
the danger of fire, endanger the public safety, unreasonably diminish or impair
health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the
intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Coiipthensive Plan.
5. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in
question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property
and do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in
which such land is located.
6. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and
enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. It will not
merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate
demonstrable hardship or difficulty.
Conclusion
The application for a variance for the purpose designated is granted, based
on the findings set forth above.
Adopted by the City Council July 19, 1976.
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Reviewed for administration: Approved as to form and legality:
City Manager City Attorney
2