Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout5556 - ADMIN Resolution - City Council - 1976/07/06ol5°(r RESOLUTION NO. 5556 A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCE IPS SIDE YARD REQUIREMENTS FROM SECTION 6:064.3 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO PERMIT A SIDE YARD OF 13 FEET FOR A CORNER LOT IN THE R-1 SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT AT 3335 HILLSBORO AVENUE BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of $t. Louis Park, Minnesota: Findings 1. Seymour Getzug has applied fora variance from Section 6:064.3 of the Zoning Ordinance to permit a side,yand on a corner lot of 13 feet for property located in the R-1 Single Family District at the following location, to -wit: Lot 10, Block 1, Isensee's Addition, commonly known as 3335 Hillsboro Avenue. 2. The Board of Appeals has reviewed the application for a variance (Case No. 76 -29 -VAR) and has transmitted the request toihe City Council without recommendation. 3. The Council has considered the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and aniricipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fjre, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area and the effect of the proposed variance upon the Comprehensive Plan. 4. Because of conditions on the subject property and on the surrounding property, it is possible to use the subject property in such a way that the proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, unreasonably increase the congestion in the public streets, increase the dancer of fire, endanger the public safety, unreasonably diminish or impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. 5. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property and do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which such land is located. 6. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. It will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty. b Conclusion The application for a variance for the purpose designated is granted based upon the findings set forth above. Adopted by the City Cpuncil July 6, 197p, Mayor Attest: City Clerk Reviewed for administration: At proved as to fgrm and legality: City Manager ` '1 City Attorney