HomeMy WebLinkAbout5534 - ADMIN Resolution - City Council - 1976/06/07JUNE 7, 1976
RESOLUTION NO- 5534
A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCE FROM SECTION 6:064.5 OF
THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO PERMIT A FRONT YARD OF 25 FEET
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE R-1 SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT
AT 4265 MEADOWBROOK ROAD
BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of St. Louis Park, Minnesota:
Findings
1. Steven Duncan has applied for a variance from Section 6:064.5 of
the Zoning Ordinance to permit a front yard of 25 feet in the R-1 Single
Family District at the following location, to -wit:
The westerly one-half of Lot 8, Block 2,
Brookside Addition, commonly known as
4265 Meadowbrook Road,
2. The Board of Appeals has reviewed the application for a variance
(Case No. 76 -23 -VAR) and has recommended to the City Council that the
application be granted.
3. The Council has considered the effect of the proposed variance
upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and antici-
pated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk tothe
public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding
area and the effect of the proposed variance upon the Comprehensive Plan.
4. Because of conditions on the subject property and on the surrounding
property, it is possible to use the subject property in such a way that the
proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to
adjacent property, unreasonably increase the congestion in the public streets,
increase the danger of fire, endanger the public safety, unreasonably diminish
or impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary
to the intent of the Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan.
5. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in
question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property,
and do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in
which such land is located,
l:
6. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation
and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. It will
not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to
alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty.
7. The following conditions and safeguards are necessary in order
to ensure and will in fact ensure there will be no unreasonably adverse
consequences to the granting of the variance:
(a) The proposed house shall be a split entry with
attached garage, designed and constructed in
accordance with Exhibit A, Elevation Plan; and
Exhibit B, Survey.
Conclusion
The application for a variance for the purpose designated is granted, based
upon the findings set forth above and subject to the conditions set forth
in paragraph 7 of these findings.
Adopted by the City Council June 7, 1976.
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Reviewed for administration: Approved as to form and legality:
City Manager City Attorney
2
\ 23
.40C° ..•.-
'0
EXioriNG� 44?L)
6E�
J
4i
30
/
SURVEY FOR: " SHELDON GUSFAFsON
82
•
Ihereby certify that this is a true and correct
representation of a survey of the boundaries of:
Lot 8, Block 2, BROOKSIDE SECOND DIVISION, Hennepin
County, Minnesota, except the East 9lfeet thereof.
46/.77/
It does not purport to show improvements or
/"'2o' encroachments, if any. Surveyed -by me this 19th day of
G P?V&T7"y/A04// w, ' April , 1976.
411/rth Services Inc.
440 Flying Cloud Drive
Eden Prairie, Minnesota
9/
8
Robert B. Meredith Minn Reg No 8617
&AAA- X -23- v4se
f/.1144144;e- r
%‘e 6J g -
w4'7,6/, 1-1.942 Vt4aig
d".g1 ,, b1, -zfliclx9
�bn - E e2 -,L. vir a5*'.7
1:
1
f!6
.4---LEvot 7-/O•?