HomeMy WebLinkAbout5358 - ADMIN Resolution - City Council - 1975/09/22•
SEPTEMBER 22, 197
6C
RESOLUTION NO. 5 3 5 8
A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCE FROM SECTION 6:064.5
OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO PERMIT A FRONT YARD
SETBACK OF 29 FEET INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED
AVERAGE OF 41 FEET FOR PROPERTY LOCATED IN
THE R-1 DISTRICT
BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of St. Louis Park, Minnesota:
Findings
1. Christian Zank has applied for a variance from Section 6:064.5
of the Zoning Ordinance to permit a front setback of 29 feet for a single
family house located in the R-1 District at the following location, to -wit:
Lot 13, Block 3, Cedarhurst, commonly
known as 2741 Inglewood Avenue South
2. The Board of Appeals has reviewed the application for a variance
(Case No. 75 -48 -VAR) and has recommended to the City Council that the
variance be granted with conditions.
3. The Council has considered the effect of the proposed variance
upon the health, safety, and welfare of the community, existing and
anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the
public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area
and the effect of the proposed variance upon the Comprehensive Plan.
4. Because of conditions on the subject property and on the surrounding
property, it i's possible to use the subject property in such a way that the '
proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to
adjacent property, unreasonably increase the congestion in the public streets,
increase the danger of fire, endanger the public safety, unreasonably diminish
or impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be
contrary to the intent of the ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan.
5. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question
are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property, and do not
apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which such land
is located.
6. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation
and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. It will not
merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate
demonstrable hardship or difficulty.
a'
7. The following conditions and safeguards are necessary in order
to ensure and will in fact ensure that there will be no unreasonably
adverse consequences to the granting of the variance:
a. The site shall be developed, used, and maintained
in accordance with Exhibit "A," Site Plan/Elevation
Plan.
Conclusion
The application for a variance for the purpose designated is granted, based
upon the findings set forth above and subject to the conditions set forth
in paragraph 7 of these findings.
Adopted by the City Council September 22, 1975.
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Reviewed for Administration: Reviewed as to form and legality:
City Manager City Attorney
-2-