HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015/01/05 - ADMIN - Minutes - City Council - Study Session Jif St. Louis Park OFFICIAL MINUTES
MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL STUDY SESSION
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
JANUARY 5, 2015
The meeting convened at 8:19 p.m.
Councilmembers present: Mayor Jeff Jacobs, Tim Brausen, Steve Hallfin, Gregg Lindberg,
Anne Mavity, Susan Sanger, and Jake Spano
Councilmembers absent: None.
Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), Director of Engineenng (Ms. Heiser), Senior
Engineenng Project Manager (Mr. Sullivan), Planning/Zoning Supervisor (Ms. McMonigal),
Organizational Development Coordinator (Ms. Gothberg), and Recording Secretary (Ms.
Hughes).
1. Southwest LRT Wooddale Station Traffic Analysis
Mr. Harmening introduced the topic.
Mr. Sullivan presented the staff report and provided additional detail regarding the traffic
analysis for the Wooddale station area and potential Xenwood underpass. He also discussed the
potential development scenario for the former McGarvey site.
Councilmember Brausen asked if it was correct that without the Xenwood underpass, dnvers
traveling south on Wooddale would not be able to turn into the McGarvey site.
Mr. Sullivan stated that drivers would be required to make a U-turn at 36th and Wooddale,
adding that staff has expressed its concerns to the SPO about U-turn movements in this area.
Councilmember Sanger asked if the SPO would leave the median open if the City were to forego
the whistle quiet zone at Wooddale
Mr. Sullivan stated that staff has discussed this with the SPO and there was some discussion
about putting a traffic signal at this location but traffic is made worse on Wooddale because there
are already five intersections within 700'. He advised that any improvements to Xenwood
Avenue would not significantly improve the traffic operations on Wooddale and it is staff's
observation that the cost associated with design and construction of the underpass would provide
benefits to other parcels but not to the traffic operations on 36th or Wooddale.
Councilmember Sanger stated if the City is going to spend $13-15 million for the Xenwood
underpass, it appears the primary beneficiary would be the development that occurs on the
McGarvey site and the City would not get any tax benefit for many years because of the TIF
financing. She questioned whether it might be worthwhile to let the McGarvey site stay
undeveloped and to skip the Xenwood underpass given the significant infrastructure costs to
support a development on the McGarvey site.
Mr. Harmening noted that the City has previously discussed creating a TIF District on the
McGarvey site and some of that tax increment would go toward the PLACE development and
would also help pay for part of the Xenwood underpass.
Special Study Session Minutes -2- January 5, 2015
Councilmember Mavity stated the McGarvey site could consist of a development that does not
include a lot of parking and felt strongly that development should occur adjacent to the light rail
station. She stated she was not sure whether building the underpass could create new problems,
but was in support of investing money on the engineering study in order to answer these
questions.
Councilmember Hallfin agreed this site would not need to have one car per apartment given its
close proximity to the light rail station. He stated he was not necessarily in favor of the
Xenwood underpass,but felt the City should proceed with the engineering study.
Councilmember Brausen stated he would like Council to consider a senior affordable housing
project on the McGarvey site and referenced a 36-unit senior affordable housing project in
Robbinsdale. He stated he was still not sold on the Xenwood underpass and felt the City could
do other things in developing this area.
Councilmember Lindberg stated that the density in this area is going to create problems no
matter what and residents will continue to drive through this comdor to get from one side of the
city to another, adding that the same could be said for the Beltline corridor.
Councilmember Spano felt that the City should proceed with the engineering study on both
Beltline and Wooddale, adding he felt the City was more likely to do Wooddale than Beltline.
He stated there is only so much that can be done with 36th and Wooddale and the real issue is the
bridge because it does not currently function as it should and it will not function in 20 years.
It was the consensus of the majority of the City Council to continue to move forward on a
commitment to fund the design for the Xenwood underpass LRCI as well as the Beltline LRCI.
2. Review Draft Agenda for 2015 Council Workshop
Mr. Harmemng presented the staff report and proposed agenda for the City Council workshop
and reviewed the proposed outcomes and proposed format for the workshop.
It was the consensus of the City Council that the draft workshop agenda and proposed format of
the workshop meets Council's expectations.
3. Review of 2015 Legislative Issues and Priorities
Mr. Harmening presented the staff report and draft list of legislative issues and pnonties He
stated that the City intends to request that the State take a more active role regarding the use of
body cameras. He stated the City also intends to seek funding support for the LRCIs related to
Southwest LRT.
Councilmember Sanger urged Council to adopt a policy statement regarding use of body
cameras. She suggested adding a prionty related to the Reilly Tar consent decree.
Mr. Harmening advised the City has been working with the MPCA about the possibility of
amending the consent decree and Council will be provided with an update in January or
February.
Special Study Session Minutes -3- January 5, 2015
Other Discussion
Mr. Harmening requested input from Council regarding the CAC and BAC interviews and stated
that the appointments need to be made in February.
Councilmember Spano spoke in favor of scoring the applicants to narrow the list, similar to the
process used by Council when appointments were made to the Environment and Sustainability
Commission.
It was the consensus of the City Council to schedule interviews with the three candidates who
have applied for the two open positions on BAC. It was also the consensus of the City Council
to direct staff to forward the CAC applications to Council for ranking.
Council discussed the current process for interviewing and selecting candidates for appointment
to the vanous boards and commissions.
Mr. Harmening suggested that Council hold a study session discussion about the City's board
and commission appointment/reappointment process.
Mayor Jacobs adjourned the meeting at 9:46 p.m.
IAda,/
1
Nancy Stroth, eity Clerk Jeff Jac v`'s,
/ r