Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012/12/17 - ADMIN - Minutes - City Council - Regular Jfl St. Louis Park OFFICIAL MINUTES MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL MEETING ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA DECEMBER 17, 2012 1. Call to Order Mayor Jacobs called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m Councilmembers present: Mayor Jeff Jacobs, Steve Hallfin, Anne Mavity, Julia Ross, Susan Sanger, Sue Santa, and Jake Spano. Councilmembers absent: None. Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), City Attorney (Mr. Scott), Deputy City Manager/Director of Human Resources (Ms. Deno), Controller (Mr. Swanson), Finance Supervisor (Mr. Heintz), Director of Public Works (Mr. Rardin), City Engineer (Mr. Bnnk), Director of Community Development (Mr. Locke), Planning/Zoning Supervisor (Ms. McMonigal), Housing Supervisor(Ms. Schnitker), Communications Coordinator (Mr. Zwilling), and Recording Secretary(Ms. Hughes). la. Pledge of Allegiance lb. Roll Call 2. Presentations 2a. Recognition of Kathy Larsen's 13 Years of Service Mayor Jacobs recited the certificate recognizing Ms. Larsen's years of service to the City and expressed Council's best wishes in her retirement. Ms. Larsen stated it has been a privilege working for the City. Mr. Harmening stated that Ms. Larsen has done an exceptional job for the City and was instrumental in the creation of the City's Housing Improvement Areas. He thanked Ms. Larsen for all her efforts to make the community a better place and stated the City will miss her. 2b. Retirement Recognition for Bill Thurston, Engineering Technician III Mayor Jacobs recited the resolution and presented a plaque recognizing the contributions of Mr. Thurston for over 40 years of dedicated service to St. Louis Park Mr. Thurston expressed thanks for allowing him to work for the City and stated it has been a pleasure to work for the City. Mr. Rardin expressed thanks to Mr. Thurston and stated Mr. Thurston has been an important member of the engineering staff. He stated Mr. Thurston served as the City's liaison for all the redevelopment along Excelsior Boulevard as well as other significant redevelopment projects throughout the community. He stated Mr. Thurston has been a dedicated employee and will be sorely missed. 3. Approval of Minutes City Council Meeting -2- December 17, 2012 3a. Study Session Meeting Minutes November 26, 2012 Councilmember Sanger requested that the third line up from the bottom of the fourth paragraph on page 4 be revised to state "is moved and felt it was moving a bike trail that made the Kenilworth alternative cheaper workable and..." The minutes were approved as amended. 3b. Special Study Session Meeting Minutes December 3, 2012 Councilmember Santa requested that the third sentence of the fifth paragraph on page 2 be revised to state "She stated that the quality of life goal needs to address the ripple effect of Kenilworth the reroute and how people's quality of life is impacted no matter where they live, and resident's ability to go about their daily business is impacted." The minutes were approved as amended. 3c. City Council Meeting Minutes of December 3, 2012 The minutes were approved as presented. 4. Approval of Agenda and Items on Consent Calendar NOTE: The Consent Calendar lists those items of business which are considered to be routine and/or which need no discussion. Consent items are acted upon by one motion. If discussion is desired by either a Councilmember or a member of the audience, that item may be moved to an appropriate section of the regular agenda for discussion. 4a. Table Second Reading of the Water Access Charge Ordinance and direct staff to reschedule the Second Reading after the completion of additional public communications and input. 4b. Waive Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance No. 2428-12 vacating 500 feet of Natchez Avenue South right-of-way extending north of Morningside Road, and approve the summary ordinance for publication. 4c. Approve extending the City's contract with Prism (People Responding in Social Ministry) to provide door-to-door dial-a-ride services to all residents of St. Louis Park through December 31, 2013. Current contract expires December 31, 2012. 4d. Approve Change Order No. 1 to Contract No. 137-12 MSA Street Maintenance (Beltline Boulevard) - Project No. 2014-1102. 4e. Approve Amendment No. 2 to Contract No. 13-12 with SUMMIT for consultant services related to the implementation of the Reilly Tar & Chemical Corporation (Reilly) Remedial Action Plan (RAP) during year 2013. 4f. Adopt Resolution No. 12-180 to recognize Engineering Technician III Bill Thurston for his 40 years of service to the City of St. Louis Park. 4g. Adopt Resolution No. 12-181 overturning the Board of Zoning Appeals (BOZA) decision to deny Sara and Henry Stokman's application for a variance from the side yard setback, and approve a two foot variance to allow an addition to the house with a three foot side yard setback instead of the required five foot side yard setback, with conditions. City Council Meeting -3- December 17, 2012 4h Approve for filing Vendor Claims. 4i. Approve for filing Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission Minutes August 15, 2012. 4j. Approve for filing Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission Minutes September 19, 2012. 4k. Approve for filing Housing Authority Minutes November 14, 2012. It was moved by Councilmember Spano, seconded by Councilmember Mavity, to approve the Agenda and items listed on the Consent Calendar; and to waive reading of all resolutions and ordinances The motion passed 7-0. 5. Boards and Commissions- None 6. Public Hearings - None 7. Requests, Petitions, and Communications from the Public—None 8. Resolutions, Ordinances, Motions and Discussion Items 8a. Adoption of 2013 Budgets, 2013 Final City and HRA Property Tax Levies, 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Plan and 2013 Utility Rates. Resolution Nos. 12-182, 12-183, 12-184 and 12-185. Mr. Swanson presented the staff report and explained that Council adopted a 2013 Preliminary Property Tax Levy of $24,712,941 on September 4, 2012, representing an increase of$950,190 or an approximate 4.00% increase from the 2012 Final Property Tax Levy. He stated this Levy is utilized to support the General Fund, Park and Recreation Fund, Capital Replacement Fund, Park Improvement Fund, and Employee Administration Fund and also provides debt service on principal and interest of the City's bonds. He stated the Truth in Taxation hearing was held on December 3, 2012, and following the public hearing staff proceeded with preparation of the 2013 budgets based on a 4.00% levy increase. He stated the Capital Improvement Plan includes $130.5 million of planned investments over the next five years; of that amount, $71.4 million will be paid from funds the City has control over and the remaining $59.1 million is planned as non-City resources. He noted that the Capital Improvement Plan does not include items for a civic community center or expansion of streets or expanded sidewalks/trails; in addition, only projects included in the Capital Improvement Plan for 2013 are authorized for purchase during the next year and years 2014-2017 are for planning purposes only. He presented the proposed 2013 utility rates noting that the City's operations are reviewed to determine if rate adjustments are needed to maintain the long-term sustainability of the utility funds and a 4.9% increase is recommended for 2013 or approximately $3.02 per month for the average residential customer. He stated that a typical residential property valued at $211,400 and having typical utilities will experience an overall increase of$2.87 per month or approximately$34.44 for the entire year. It was moved by Councilmember Santa, seconded by Councilmember Sanger, to adopt Resolution No. 12-182 Adopting the 2013 Budgets and Authorizing the 2013 Final Property Tax Levy. City Council Meeting -4- December 17, 2012 Councilmember Mavity expressed thanks to staff for their efforts in preparing the budgets. She felt this was the most important vote taken by Council each year and the 2013 budget will help consistently move the City toward long-term sustainability. The motion passed 7-0 It was moved by Councilmember Santa, seconded by Councilmember Sanger, to adopt Resolution No. 12-183 Approving the 2013 Final HRA Levy The motion passed 7-0. It was moved by Councilmember Santa, seconded by Councilmember Sanger, to adopt Resolution No. 12-184 Adopting the 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program. The motion passed 7-0. It was moved by Councilmember Santa, seconded by Councilmember Sanger, to adopt Resolution No. 12-185 Setting Utility Rates. The motion passed 7-0. 8b. Fund Equity Transfers and Operating Transfers. Resolution No. 12-186. Mr. Swanson presented the staff report and advised that staff routinely analyzes the City's projected fund balances to ensure the City is meeting its Fund Balance Policy with a goal of achieving long-term sustainability in the General Fund. He stated that a transfer of $1.16 million from the General Fund is recommended in order to achieve a fund balance position of 45%. He explained that $500,000 of this amount will be transferred to the Park Improvement Fund, $400,000 will be transferred to the Uninsured Loss Fund, $225,000 will be transferred to the Park & Recreation Fund, and $35,000 will be transferred to the Benefits Administration Fund. He stated that an operating transfer of $300,000 from the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund to the Capital Replacement Fund is also recommended to address long-term sustainability challenges in this fund, as well as a transfer of$1.2 million from the Sewer Utility Fund to the Water Utility Fund and a transfer of$500,000 from the Housing Rehabilitation Fund to the Park Center TIF Distnct Fund. It was moved by Councilmember Santa, seconded by Councilmember Hallfin, to adopt Resolution No. 12-186 Authorizing Fund Equity Transfers and Operating Transfers The motion passed 7-0. 8c. Eliot Park Apartments — Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Civic to High Density and Low Density Residential. Resolution No. 12-187. Ms. McMonigal presented the staff report and provided historical background regarding the redevelopment of this site including the neighborhood design guideline process. She stated that five neighborhood meetings were held and the design guidelines were developed with substantial neighborhood input. She advised the Comprehensive Plan City Council Meeting -5- December 17, 2012 amendment is a combination of high density residential and low density residential and was evaluated based on land use planning principles and community goals. She indicated the Comprehensive Plan amendment is required by Ordinance to take place prior to any rezoning of the parcel. She stated the current proposal for the site includes three single family lots on the north side and two apartment buildings with 69 units in each building for a total of 138 units. She stated the maximum height of the apartment buildings will be three stories with underground parking for residents and an access drive and guest parking in the middle of the site. She noted the development proposal retains 48% green space and respects the previous presence of Eliot School along Cedar Lake Road and adds to neighborhood connectivity. She stated the request is to change the site from Civic to High Density Residential and Low Density Residential and meets the standards of the Comprehensive Plan and meets or exceeds the intent of the design guidelines in terms of intensity of development on the site and impacts to the neighborhood. She then introduced Mr. Dan Hunt, President of Hunt Associates. Mr. Dan Hunt, President of Hunt Associates, appeared before the City Council and stated they have been working with staff and the neighborhood for over a year. He stated if the Comprehensive Plan amendment is approved, they will come back with the necessary zoning requests and project plans. Ms. Judy Dvorak, 6636 West 16th Street, appeared before the City Council and stated she could not believe that another meeting on this issue was being held when the City Council previously voted against it. She presented a map of the neighborhood and noted that this small section of the City does not have many through streets and includes dead- end streets on both sides of Eliot. She stated there are at least 25 apartment buildings already in this neighborhood and they do not want the extra traffic. She asked the City Council to consider putting in 6-10 unit apartments or townhomes on the site if the City cannot put single family homes on this site. Mayor Jacobs recited an email from Ms. Gretchen Garcia, 6630 West 16th Street, which was made part of the official record. Mr. Christopher Petrie, 2049 Jersey Avenue South, appeared before the City Council and stated he attended one of the neighborhood meetings and one hour of the meeting was spent talking about how the neighborhood wanted single family homes and the other time they heard from a City representative telling them they had to come up with a recommendation for higher density. He stated the overall opinion of the neighborhood was that they wanted single family homes and asked about the City Council's goal regarding high density and low density homes. He indicated he preferred single family homes for this site but if the site is going to be high density residential, he would support that designation in order to get underground parking. Councilmember Ross stated that Council would like to see single family homes on this site,but the School District has not been approached by anyone interested in purchasing the site for over three years; in the meantime, the property has been vacant and has been vandalized. She felt this was-the best offer currently on the table and the Ordinance requires the Comprehensive Plan amendment to be approved first and Mr. Hunt will come back to Council to present his development proposal in the coming months. She added she felt the development proposal will meet or exceed most of the design guidelines and includes a significant amount of green space. City Council Meeting -6- December 17, 2012 Mr. John Lang, 6610 Cedar Lake Road, appeared before the City Council and stated he was against arbitrarily changing the site to high density in case something goes wrong with the current development proposal and it does not get built as proposed. He added he does not want to see a developer come in with a five-story building. Mayor Jacobs asked if Council can change the Comprehensive Plan to something other than high density if Council determines a development proposal is unacceptable. Ms. McMonigal replied the City Council has the ability to change the Comprehensive Plan back to its earlier designation. Councilmember Ross noted that Mr. Hunt's proposal will be asking for medium density zoning. Ms. McMonigal indicated the Zoning Code has different categories that overlap slightly from the Comprehensive Plan and Mr. Hunt's proposal would be for R-4 zoning with a PUD which means the City Council would have to specifically approve several site items including all zoning items. Mr. Philip Murphy, 1841 Hampshire Avenue, appeared before the City Council and questioned the long term impacts of this development on property values along Hampshire, Jersey and Idaho and how the development might impact their ability to sell their homes. He expressed concern about traffic stating he felt it will be an immense burden in this neighborhood and will impact their ability to live safely. He stated if this amendment passes, he is going to sell his house and felt the City will see an exodus from this neighborhood and he asked the City Council to consider that. He stated he would like to see green space, duplexes, townhouses, or single family houses on this site. Mr. Joe Stark, 1810 Hampshire Avenue, appeared before the City Council and the initial proposal was for medium density housing and felt the School District was looking short term to get money to the long term detnment to the area. He questioned the amount of available parking and was concerned about the number of cars moving fast through the neighborhood. Councilmember Spano stated that this item was placed on the agenda for reconsideration following an inaccurate statement made at an earlier City Council meeting regarding offers received by the School District for this property. He stated that in order to give this developer an opportunity to create a final plan for consideration by Council, from a procedural standpoint Council has to consider the Comprehensive Plan amendment first. Councilmember Ross acknowledged the traffic concerns along Cedar Lake Road and stated that Mr. Hunt appears to be open to suggestions especially in terms of traffic patterns in this area. Councilmember Mavity indicated her support for the Comprehensive Plan amendment and stated she liked the proposed design and what the developer has done in terms of alignment with the design guidelines. She pointed out her support of the Comprehensive Plan amendment is conditioned on the zoning overlay that will come back later for Council action and added she supported medium density development on this site. City Council Meeting -7- December 17, 2012 Councilmember Sanger stated she would not be supporting the Comprehensive Plan amendment at this time. She indicated she was opposed to the amendment because the density is too dense and too stark of a contrast with all the single family homes surrounding the site. She stated she would have preferred all single family housing on the site but that is not economically realistic and felt the School Distnct priced this parcel so high that no developer could afford to buy it for single family homes. Councilmember Hallfin stated he previously voted against this based on concerns similar to those expressed by Councilmember Sanger. He stated one of the issues in the City is the availability of move-up housing and he thought this parcel would provide a great opportunity to provide more single family housing in St. Louis Park. It was moved by Councilmember Ross, seconded by Councilmember Santa, to approve Resolution No. 12-187 Approving an Amendment to the 2030 Comprehensive Plan for the City of St. Louis Park Under Minnesota Statutes 462.351 to 462.364 (6720 and 6800 Cedar Lake Road) The motion passed 5-2 (Councilmembers Hallfin and Sanger opposed). 8d. Approval of City Comments on the Southwest Transitway Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS). Mr. Locke presented the staff report and stated the DEIS comments have applied the City's policies on freight rail and light rail and the City's comments include the City Council's previously adopted Resolution Nos. 10-070 and 11-058. He stated the deadline for submission of comments is December 31, 2012, and all materials will become part of the official record that the Met Council consultants will use for Preliminary Engineering as well as for preparation of the Final Environmental Impact Statement. Mayor Jacobs complimented Mr. Locke, Ms. McMomgal and their staff members for all their efforts in preparing comments to the 1,000 page DEIS. He reminded residents that individual comments can also be submitted to the Met Council by December 31, 2012. Councilmember Mavity thanked staff for their efforts and indicated the City's DEIS comments will be posted on the website once they are finalized. She indicated that Safety in the Park has been involved in this issue and has done an excellent job raising issues about how a reroute will impact the overall community. She stated she felt there has been less attention focused on issues around the Beltline and Wooddale stops and wanted to make sure the City raises those issues as part of the City's DEIS comments. She stated that Council is not voting today on where the trains are routed and when the City's DEIS, comments are submitted the Met Council will take control of the process and begin Preliminary Engineering. She advised that several weeks ago, she accepted a position with Commissioner Gail Dorfman and before taking the job she consulted with the City Attorney and received a clear opinion that she has an absolute right to continue serving as Ward 2 Councilmember. She advised that this evening she will not be exercising that nght and will recuse herself from the vote on the DEIS comments. She stated she does not want to be a distraction to this important work and added she completely supports the City's DEIS comments. She stated the City needs mitigation no City Council Meeting -8- December 17, 2012 matter where the trains go and stated she believes the Draft Environmental Impact Statement does not adequately address the types of mitigation the City will need. Mayor Jacobs stated that this project will have a significant impact on everything in the community and Council regards all mitigation as necessary mitigation and not optional enhancements. Mr. Marc Berg, 2913 Webster Avenue So., appeared before the City Council and agreed with Councilmember Mavity's decision to recuse herself from voting this evening and felt she should continue to recuse herself whenever this issue is discussed because he did not think she could fairly represent her ward and the City's interests at large while reporting to Commissioner Dorfman. He indicated that he will be submitting his own comments and agreed that the Section 4f analysis was flawed. Mr. Ryan Edstrom, 2824 Yosemite Avenue, appeared before the City Council and presented Council with a copy of his analysis. He stated that Chapter 7 of the DEIS shows parkland that will be used on Cedar Lake Park and did not think the DEIS did a good job of explaining how or why parkland would be used. He stated the County records for that area show that until 2011 the rail runs in the parkland property and this needs to be addressed in the DEIS. He showed several maps of the area and stated it was not clear how or why the co-location option would affect the property in that area. He also pointed out that the nght-of-way available to the east of this area is owned by HCRRA and there is a lot of space between the track and eastern boundary of HCRRA's property, noting there is approximately 150' along that corridor which would negate any 4f use and would eliminate that property from being considered and used for this project. He added that the design drawings clearly show that the map they used was improperly overlaid on the aerial showing property lines running through homes and deserves another look. Councilmember Sanger asked if Mr. Edstrom's comments regarding the inaccurate maps and the railroad operating on parkland can be included in the City's comments. Mr. Locke stated that the staff is aware of the issue, and it is addressed in the DEIS appendices. Staff also included the issue in their comments. Mr. Jeff Roy, 3233 Florida Avenue, appeared before the City Council and stated he was happy to hear the City Council's continuing efforts to support the people of St. Louis Park. He thanked the City Council for all its work and thanked Councilmember Mavity for recusing herself. He encouraged the City to include additional Section 4f comments based on Mr Edstrom's earlier remarks. Mr. Tom Johnson, 4701 40th Lane, appeared before the City Council and stated he is a professional engineer and has wntten a 20 page report regarding this project. He indicated the report is in draft form and agreed to provide Council with a copy of his report adding that he would make himself available for questions. He urged the City to reject the MN&S reroute in the strongest possible language based on a number of factors outlined in his report, including cost of construction, crossing accidents, derailments, noise, and mitigation. He stated he completed a study of the MN&S and reached a number of conclusions, including his belief that the cost of the freight reroute grossly underestimates the cost of the MN&S upgrade, that the reroute on MN&S is a much more City Council Meeting -9- December 17, 2012 dangerous alternative due to crossing accidents and derailments. He added the noise and vibration studies are misguided resulting in worthless data and conclusions. Mayor Jacobs encouraged Mr. Johnson to submit his comments to the Met Council. Ms. Jamie LaPray, 3256 Blackstone, appeared before the City Council and expressed appreciation for all the time that the City Council has put into this issue. She felt the City has not said enough against the proposed reroute and felt the City needed to add language that either asks for a new LPA or an independent study looking into why the DEIS is so one-sided toward the reroute as opposed to the co-location option. She stated at an HCRRA meeting in November 2011, Commissioner Dorfman made a statement to the effect of "how do we study this without people thinking co-location is seriously on the table" and that "promises have been made." She stated in light of Commissioner Dorfnan's comments and the fact that the DEIS is one-sided she felt it was negligent of the City Council not to ask for a new LPA so residents have the same opportunities afforded to those in the Kenilworth corridor. She added they will never know what the LPA would have been had the reroute been in the scoping process in the beginning and the City might not be here discussing mitigation if another route was chosen. She did not believe asking to take a step back was wrong and felt it would make the process more transparent and add trust to the process. She felt that Councilmember Mavity's work with Commissioner Dorfman and not recusing herself on future votes would sorely affect the trust residents have in the City Council. Ms. Lyn Wik, 3965 Quentin Avenue So., appeared before the City Council and thanked the City Council and City staff for all their hard work. She stated the City of Minneapolis has unequivocally said "no" to co-location and questioned why the City Council could not state an equally strong "no" to the reroute. Ms. Kathryn Kottke, 2712 Brunswick Avenue So., appeared before the City Council and urged the City Council to speak strongly against the reroute. She stated the County has not been listening to them and the City Council must assure that the community is protected because the DEIS has neglected to study the reroute's negative impact on the City. Mr. Greg Suchanek, 2740 Blackstone, appeared before the City Council and stated he has not seen anything to indicate what will happen with the current bus routes in the SWLRT and the impact on bus riders. Councilmember Santa stated she has talked to Metro Transit representatives and was told when light rail comes in the bus routes will change but the plans have not been firmed up. Mr. Greg Suchanek stated if the reroute occurs, there might be an opportunity to truly make this a rail corridor and limit the impacts to St. Louis Park. He acknowledged this would mean the taking of more homes but could eliminate as many crossings as possible. He thanked the City Council for its hard work and the many hours spent on this issue. Mr. Jeff Byers, 4123 Wooddale Avenue So., appeared before the City Council and requested information regarding the municipal consent vote. City Council Meeting -10- December 17, 2012 Mayor Jacobs stated that municipal consent will come up in late 2013 or early 2014 and the City can withhold municipal consent, however, the City will want to obtain advice from the City Attorney regarding that issue. He stated when the City submits it DEIS comments the Met Council will review all the comments received and determine what happens with the reroute and all cities will then have an additional time penod to make a decision regarding municipal consent. He added the City intends to continue working in the intenm with its Met Council representatives regarding mitigation. It was moved by Councilmember Sanger, seconded by Councilmember Santa, to approve the proposed SWLRT DEIS comments for submittal to Hennepin County by December 31, 2012, subject to additional revisions that staff has agreed to make and with the understanding that the City will be drafting additional comments in response to the recent posting by the Surface Transportation Board. The motion passed 6-0-1 (Councilmember Mavity recused herself from the vote). Mr. Harmening stated that the emails received by the City and by Council will be made part of the official record and placed in the DEIS file. Councilmember Sanger presented an email from Paul and Linda Jennings, 3925 Joppa Avenue, expressing support for SWLRT and opposing the rerouting of freight rail and asked that this email be made part of the official record. 8e. 2013 Employee Compensation. Resolution No. 12-188. Ms. Deno presented the staff report and advised that non-union employee compensation for 2013 includes a 2% increase and noted that all five unions settled at a 2% increase for 2013. She stated that the City Manager's salary is reviewed by a consultant and includes a survey of Midwest cities and the consultant has recommended a 2% increase in the salary range and compensation will be accordance with the salary cap. She stated the City's volunteer firefighter benefit program includes a life and disability insurance benefit and it is recommended that the City continue participation in this program. She stated the paid-on-call firefighter performance program is reviewed annually and the Fire Chief has recommended a 2% increase to this program effective January 1, 2013. It was moved by Councilmember Hallfin, seconded by Councilmember Sanger, to adopt Resolution No. 12-188 Confirming Compensation for Non-Union Employees; Setting the City Manager's Salary; Continuing Participation in the Volunteer Firefighter Benefit Program; and Continuing Performance Program Pay for Paid-On-Call Firefighters. The motion passed 7-0 8f. Resolution Approving Annual City Manager Evaluation. Resolution No. 12- 189. Mayor Jacobs summarized the City Manager's annual evaluation conducted by Council in closed executive session and stated Mr. Harmening's evaluation score was 3.6 on a scale of 1-4 and he received the highest overall ratings on communication skills, public relations, fiscal and business management, and relationship with City Council. He stated City Council Meeting -11- December 17, 2012 that Mr. Harmemng is a highly valued leader and the City is fortunate to have him and the City Council is pleased with his performance. It was moved by Councilmember Mavity, seconded by Councilmember Spano, to approve Resolution No. 12-189 Accepting the Annual City Manager Evaluation. The motion passed 7-0. 9. Communications Councilmember Ross thanked residents for shoveling their sidewalks after the recent snowstorm. 10. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 9:41 p.m. —�cPiyt 'I► Nancy Strotlf;