HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005/08/08 - ADMIN - Minutes - City Council - Study Session 7 CITY OF
T. LOUIS OFFICIAL MINUTES
PARK CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
August 8, 2005
The meeting convened at 6:30 p.m.
Councilmembers present: John Basill, Jim Brimeyer, Phil Finkelstein, Paul Omodt, Susan
Sanger, Sue Santa and Mayor Jeff Jacobs.
Staff present: City Manager(Mr. Harmening), Public Works Director(Mr. Rardin); City Engineer
(Mr. Brink); Community Development Director(Mr. Locke); Planning Coordinator(Ms. Erickson);
Planning and Zoning Supervisor(Ms. McMomgal); Economic Development Coordinator(Mr.
Hunt); Planning Intern (Ms. Johnson); and City Clerk(Ms. Reichert).
1. Lake Street Reconstruction
Mr. Brink and Mr. Rardin provided council with an overview of the proposed project, and asked
for council feedback on a public process.
Mayor Jacobs said that the businesses along West Lake street would like to see an enhanced
streetscape. He asked if a special service district could be established at that location. He
pointed out that many persons from outside the city use that street to attend school sporting
events.
Councilmember Sanger said some residents would like to see the roadway narrowed and
sidewalks placed along the street.
Councilmember Finkelstein said that future changes to the intersection at Wooddale and Hwy 7
needed to be considered.
Councilmember Basill said that whatever we do must tie into an above-grade crossing. He
believed that pedestrian safety was paramount. He was concerned that narrowing the street
would restrict passage and wanted staff to look at other ways to calm traffic.
Staff will keep council informed as we move forward through the public process.
2. Industrial Study
Jaci Johnson, Planning Intern, presented to council the Industrial Study she had conducted over
the course of her internship with the city. The Study is a profile of St. Louis Park's current
industrial buildings with photographs and other information about each site. Council was very
pleased with the result of her work.
Ms Erickson explained that next steps will be to conduct a market study of the properties and to
determine direction based on the assets of each property.
Mayor Jacobs encouraged staff to include stakeholders in the process as we move forward.
Councilmember Finkelstein suggested that the President of the local AFLCIO be included as we
move forward to provide perspective regarding jobs. Councilmember Santa suggested we
include leaders from surrounding neighborhoods.
Study Session Minutes -2- August 8, 2005
Councilmember Sanger questioned why we are undertaking further study. She asked how the
study results would affect requirements for zomng that come up prior to completion of the study.
Mr. Harmening suggested that during the data analysis and study portion of our efforts we should
be looking at requests on a case by case basis. A full study with guidance for future council
action will be attractive to business and could help in future marketing efforts.
Councilmember Basill believed information gathered by further study would help council to
determine where industry should occur in the city.
Councilmember Finkelstein also believed that it is good to be proactive to help with business
attraction and retention.
Councilmember Sanger also stated that funds would be needed to attract businesses and to clean
up industrial sites in the future.
Councilmember Santa said future transportation needs should be considered as part of the study.
Councilmember Omodt asked that the real estate perspective also be considered. He also
suggested council consider whether we view industrial businesses as an asset or as a liability.
Mr. Harmening said that we will need to enlist the help of a consultant to add to the very good
information we already have.
Council again thanked Ms. Johnson for her fine work in putting together the information.
3. Zoning Code Issues Related to Housing Summit
Religious Institutions in Cl District- Councilmember Sanger had asked that council consider
implications of a request from her ward for a zoning change to allow religious institutions in
areas zoned C-1. Ms McMonigal explained the request which relates to the ERUV designation
in portions of ward 1.
Council and staff discussed various options for accommodating the request including revising
both the commercial and mixed use requirements to allow for this use.
Councilmember Sanger asked if the use could be allowed with limitations on square feet. Mr.
Locke agreed to look as restrictions that could minimize conflict if the use were to be allowed.
More will come to council at a future date.
Garage Expansions— Staff brought forward modifications to the zoning ordinance which would
allow for greater creativity with garages. After viewing pictures of structures which are and are
not allowed in St. Louis Park, council directed staff and the planning commission to move
forward with more suggestions for revisions to the ordinance.
Study Session Minutes -3- August 8, 2005
4. Louisiana Court Stabilization Plan
Council was asked to discuss alternative courses of action to address problems at Louisiana
Court, PPL's request for$400,000 in funding to assist with capital improvements,US Bank's
request that the city not take action to foreclose on the property prior to 2015 and feedback from
a recent meeting held with the project's funders. Steve Bubul of Kennedy and Graven and Mark
Ruff of Ehler's and Associates were in attendance.
Ms. Schnitker described the proposed stabilization plan which consists of several facets
including additional capital improvements, replacing management efforts to retain current
residents and reduce operating expenses, and the introduction of a limited number of rent
subsidies.
In addition, a task force comprised of the funding partners, PPL, US Bank and industry experts,
would collaborate on determining the project's needs, create new initiatives and establish
performance benchmarks and goals. MHFA staff would play a key role in initiative, and
coordinating this effort.
Councilmembers expressed concern about what would happen if the stabilization plan was not
successful. They were concerned about PPL's participation in the project going forward and
asked what steps could be taken to remove PPL from the mix entirely.
Councilmember's also expressed concerns and disagreements with US Bank's request that the
City promise not to foreclose prior to 2015.
Ms. Schnitker responded that PPL would need to continue as a partner moving forward, but that
the new management company that had been put in place was doing very well. She believed that
the stabilization plan would be successful even if PPL continues as a partner.
Mr. Locke stated that the task force would be key in ensuring the future success of the project.
Councilmember Finkelstein did not want PPL to manage any of the construction projects related
to improvements on the property.
Ms. Schnitker stated that MFHA was comfortable with construction plans and that checks and
balances were in place to ensure the construction would be carried out as it should be. MHFA
employs an inspecting architect to oversee the project and PPL has retained a general contractor
to facility the rehabilitation.
Councilmember Omodt was opposed to additional investment on the part of the city. If the
contribution is made he wanted to see an exit strategy. He did not feel the problem was with
PPL, rather the buildings themselves. Scattered housing was a better option and the model at
Louisiana Court was a concentration of poverty. He believed the city's choice was to invest
additional money on Louisiana Courts or to invest in other types of low-income housing. He
thought the only was these units would ever be full would be if the economy is so bad that
people had not choice but to live there. He also did not want mentally ill persons housed in a
development where crime may be a problem.
Study Session Minutes -4- August 8, 2005
Councilmember Sanger also wanted more information on the proposal to house mentally ill
persons at the site. She also wanted an exit strategy and wanted to receive regular updates on the
progress made by the new management.
Mayor Jacobs believed that a better job could be done managing the property and hoped the new
management company was successful. He would vote to approve the additional city investment
if he felt there was appropriate accountability. The oversight task force may be able to provide
that.
Councilmember Santa hoped that with this investment, the partners could move toward a more
positive relationship. The history at the Meadowbrook site showed that community investment
in that site had resulted in positive benefits. She hoped the same positive outcomes would occur
at Louisiana Courts.
Councilmember Sanger stated there is a need for social services at the site. Mr. Locke responded
that the oversight task force would also be addressing social issues.
Councilmember Basill wanted to know what would happen if the city did not invest the
$400,000.
Mr. Locke stated that we have two choices: invest in the property or do nothing. If we do
nothing we risk default on the original bond in the amount of$4.3 million, and no improvements
will have been made leaving the city holding a very expensive redevelopment project.
Mr. Harmening said the council was being asked to spend $400,000 to leverage approximately
$1.2 million dollars of improvements which would protect our$4.3 million dollar investment.
He also stated this would be coming forward to the council for approval within the next few
weeks.
5. Council and EDA Salaries
Council discussed options for adjusting salaries of councilmembers and EDA commissioners. A
public hearing will be held in early October to consider an ordinance amending those salaries.
The meeting adjourned at 10:06 p.m.
A ,411111r,tizt- 61(4„
City Clerk I Ma or