HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004/03/01 - ADMIN - Minutes - City Council - Study Session OF OFFICIAL MINUTES
T
EOUIS CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
RK March 1, 2004
The meeting convened at 8.30 p.m.
Councilmembers present were Phil Finkelstein, Paul Omodt, John Basill, Susan Sanger, and
Mayor Jeff Jacobs.
Staff present. City Manager(Mr. Harmening), Planning and Zoning Coordinator(Ms.
Jeremiah), and Recording Secretary(Ms. Stroth).
1. Quadion Redevelopment Proposal & Request for Financial Assistance
Ms. Jeremiah introduced Michael Noonan and Tim Whitten from Rottlund and George Sherman
from Sherman & Associates to the Council. She would like to talk about ownership issues and
stated that Quadion owned property on both the east and west sides of Wooddale including two
single family properties. There are two single family properties that they are interested in
acquiring. Ms. Jeremiah explained the two alternatives that Rottlund brought to the Planning
Commission. Alternative 1 would include the two single family homes and Alternative 2 would
not. She stated that by adding the four single family properties they would gain 18 additional
town homes. By not attaining the properties, they would lose parking as the roadways would
have to go around other properties. Ms. Jeremiah stated that there are stormwater issues that are
now close to being resolved.
Ms Jeremiah stated that progress has been made on the purchase of the remaining two single
family homes. She added that there would be a financial gap of$800,000 if the single family
properties were retained
Ms Jeremiah explained that Sherman Properties had proposed twenty percent of the senior
housing to be affordable housing which equates to 16 of the 80 units. She stated that Mr.
Sherman had submitted his Tax Increment Financing application as well as his application to
Hennepin County for funding.
Mr. Sherman reported that even at market rate prices, the units would not support the cost of the
project He stated that affordable units would be required to even apply for TIF. Mayor Jacobs
asked what the gap would be if there were no affordable units and Councilmember Sanger
inquired where they would get the money from Mr Sherman stated that the gap would be $1
million dollars. Mr. Harmening summarized that there would not be a lot of funding sources
available to cover the gap and that Mr. Sherman would need to rely on TIF funds.
Councilmember Finkelstein asked what the back up plan would be if they could not do the
affordable units and Mr. Sherman replied that it would be up to Rottlund as he would have to
step out. Councilmember Finkelstein stated that the Council had heard that there would not be a
need for public money. Ms. Jeremiah stated that the redevelopment of the office building raises
costs. Mr. Noonen felt the office building needs to stay. Councilmember Sanger inquired if
senior rental housing could be put in its place. Mr. Noonen replied that it would be
condominiums steered towards seniors. He stated that there will still be a gap due to acquisition
costs.
Study Session Minutes -2- March 1, 2004
Mr. Noonen stated that they could still go forward even if they did not obtain the single family
homes on Oxford St. Mr. Noonen replied that there are three pieces to the project: the Oxford
properties, senior housing, and the possibility of even going further with more TIF.
Mr. Harmening felt the most pressing issue for Rottlund at the moment is the ownership of the
single family homes. He reported that they have made very good progress with the two
remaining homes and feels they are neanng an agreement. Mr. Harmening stated that the goal is
to approve a preliminary plan in the middle of March for two different alternatives. Mr. Noonen
explained that they would like Council support of Alternative 1 with Alternative 2 as a fall back
measure. Mr. Noonen stated that they would like a timeframe on completing discussions on
municipal funds for the project. He stated if after good faith efforts Alternative 1 was not
approved they would move forward with Alternative 2 without the single family homes. He
explained that the needed an approval on which they could rely as they are on a very tight
timeframe. Councilmember Sanger clarified that Rottlund wished the Council to approve both
PUD's.
Mr. Noonen stated that he has wntten the contracts contingent upon three matters and that they
have appropriate approval by the city and financial assistance. Ms. Jeremiah stated that this is
dust the preliminary stage and it would still need to come back for final approval. Mr. Ruff stated
that by approving both options it puts them at a disadvantage and would make it more awkward
to negotiate. Councilmember Finkelstein inquired if this commits them to using TIF. Mr. Ruff
replied that normally a project will either happen with TIF or not happen without TIF.
Councilmember Finkelstein asked what happens if they move forward with Alternative 1 and
then Council decides they cannot afford TIF. Mr. Ruff replied that the purchase agreements
would be contingent on these factors. Mr. Noonen stated that redevelopment of the area is
supported by the community and the community would rather see some redevelopment than
none at all.
Mayor Jacobs felt it all boiled down to how much nsk the Council is willing to go forward with
Alternative 1. Councilmember Basil inquired if it was possible to develop a formula that would
base TIF on the purchase price of the homes. Councilmember Sanger suggested a formula plus a
cap, though she had concerns that would dnve up the purchase price. Mr. Ruff stated that they
need to determine the amount of profit from the project and its relation to the amount of
assistance from the city.
Mr. Harmening stated that he needed to understand the rush and commented that Council is not
required to vote on this on March 15`h. Jim Voss, Cresa Partners, stated the building they were
moving into would close on April 1St and if they could not meet that deadline, they would not
have anywhere to go and the project could not move forward. He stated that a sixty day
requirement causes some serious problems for them. Mr. Noonen inquired if TIF is appropnate
to acquire the properties. Councilmember Basill did not feel that TIF was not appropriate but the
question remains of how much TIF. The Council agreed.
Mr. Noonen stated that they could achieve the same end goal if they approved Alternative 1 with
a time specific penod for municipal finance or with Alternative 2 with a commitment for
Rottlund to work with the city on the same end result. Mr. Harmening had concerns that the end
result may not be the same and their bargaining position may be compromised. He stated that he
has told the single family property owners he would need a decision within a week. Mr.
Harmening stated that further analysis is needed on the proposal and clarification of the amount
of the gap.
Study Session Minutes -3- March 1, 2004
Councilmember Basill would like to present Alternative 1 as the preferred alternative with
Alternative 2 as a fall back along with a side agreement. Mr. Harmemng stated that a third
approach would be to approve Alternative 2 with the intent of working towards Alternative 1 but
that would have to come back for further approval.
Mr. Ruff inquired what happened if Rottlund comes back with condos and Ms. Jeremiah stated
that it does fit the plat
Councilmember Sanger brought up condemnation and if it would be of assistance to Rottlund as
well as lenders. Mr. Noonen did not feel that it would be necessary. Mayor Jacobs asked for
staff to update them as soon as they get word on the two properties. He emphasized the need to
see actual numbers for the TIF amount needed and asked Mr Ruff to review the proposal
Councilmember Sanger would like to see an update at the next study session so that Council can
discuss what amount is acceptable to the City
Mayor Jacobs stated that there is a possibility of holding a special meeting on either March 22nd
or 29`h
2. Communications
Mr. Harmening updated the Council on the possibility of a future organizational development
session/retreat.
Mr. Harmening reported that the city's legislation bills have been heard in committee.
Mr. Harmening gave an update on solid waste and stated that there is a large problem with
overflowing garbage carts and approximately 20% of homes were not in compliance. He stated
that a letter would be going out to residents to remind them of the ordinance requirements.
Councilmember Sanger would like to see a warning notification placed on overflowing carts
between now and when the letter is mailed out. Councilmember Omodt had concerns with
uncollected waste and the odor it would cause. Councilmember Finkelstein asked for
clarification on what the ordinance states on where carts can be placed Mr Harmening clarified
that carts should be put in the resident's garage as well as certain places in the yard, but not in
the street.
Mr. Harmening reported that they received 112 applications for the Community Development
Director position and he has narrowed it down to ten candidates. Interviews will be held on
March 8` and 9th A meet and greet for the finalists will be held on March 16th from 8:30 to 9 00
a.m.
3. Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 9:45 p.m.
51L,.-,2-- — . gjz_,_az_:ij__ . .# 6f ?C&(/*/CitClerk raYo Y