HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001/02/26 - ADMIN - Minutes - City Council - Study Session CITY OF
ST. LOUIS OFFICIAL MINUTES
PARK CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
February 26, 2001
The meeting convened at 7:00 p.m.
Present at the meeting were Councilmembers Jim Brimeyer, Ron Latz, Susan Sanger, Susan
Santa, and Mayor Jeff Jacobs.
Staff present. City Manager(Mr. Meyer), Community Development Director (Mr. Harmening),
Economic Development Coordinator(Mr. Kleve), Planning and Zoning Supervisor (Ms.
Jeremiah), Community Development Intern (Mr. Vickerman), Finance Director(Ms. McGann),
and City Clerk (Ms Larsen).
1. Metropolitan Council Representative Frank Hornstein
Mr Hornstein of the Metropolitan Council was present along with Community Relations
Specialist, Mr Byron Johnson.
Mr Hornstein spoke about his involvement with the Park Commons and Mill City development
projects. He mentioned the Met Council's policy of linking housing performance with grant
funding. He invited Council and staff to a public hearing in March to demonstrate St. Louis
Park's leadership in the area of housing development.
The fare increase for Metro Transit was briefly discussed
Mr Johnson stated that he was one of the four new Community Relations Specialists and he
would like to help the Met Council be more accessible to other stakeholders.
Mr Meyer brought up the dedicated busway changes that had occurred. He was concerned that
the proposed bus routes do not address reverse commutes. He added that city staff is working
with Metro Transit on the issue
Mr Hornstein encouraged Council to be specific in their dialog and concerns with him to help
him address the issues effectively
Councilmember Santa discussed the fact that a significant piece of the system has been cut of the
plan which limits the ability to connect with surrounding communities.
Mr. Meyer indicated future discussion should take place on the transition of dedicated busways
to light rail in the future.
Council and the representatives from Met Council spoke about other issues that Met Council is
facing in connection with St Louis Park They mentioned housing stock issues and the
possibility of working with that issue in the future
All agreed they value the partnership between the City of St. Louis Park and Metropolitan
Council
Study Session Minutes -2- February 26, 2001
2. Application for Private Activity Bonds
Council and staff discussed regulations for issuing private activity bonds and the entities that are
allowed to do so by law. Ms. McGann proceeded to distribute a handout regarding Private
Revenue Activity Bonds.
Ms McGann informed Council that requests may be coming to the City for Private Activity
Revenue Bonds. She indicated that staff had received two inquiries from interested parties
Council discussed the criteria they may want to use in the future to determine if requests for
private activity bonds are honored. They reviewed the revised application and agreed that they
had no objections so long as the City Attorney's Office had previously reviewed and accepted
the form
Council directed staff to utilize the new application format and agreed that requests for issuance
of Private Activity Revenue Bonds would be reviewed on a case by case basis.
3. Park Commons Update
Bob Cunningham of TOLD was present at the meeting.
Ms. Jeremiah spoke about the open house and the plans for the town green.
Mr. Cunningham commented on affordable housing and the possibility that the proposed
Holman units may need to be concentrated into one building location because of HUD
requirements Councilmember Sanger suggested that St. Louis Park contact its legislators to
reduce restrictions on spreading affordable housing throughout a project.
Mr. Cunningham indicated that the Bally's corporation may not want to move forward with
acquiring space in the project.
A three dimensional model was presented to Council
4. Tree Replacement Ordinance
Peter Vickerman, Community Development Intern, gave a comparison of the tree replacement
policies of other surrounding cities. He indicated that staff would like to receive feedback on the
overall intent and practical effect of the current ordinance, amend the Code to include a cash-in-
lieu option, and adjust on several factors in the replacement policy.
Council discussed the cash-in-lieu option allowing developers to provide cash for tree planting
elsewhere in the City when it is not possible for tree replacement on the development site. They
also discussed replacement with trees of a different size, such as shrubs or larger trees
Mr. Harmening indicated that he wants to ensure that St. Louis Park's tree replacement
ordinance is not a detriment to developers.
Councilmember Sanger suggested modifying the tree replacement ordinance to permit land
owners to place additional trees on adjacent properties as a buffer between them.
Study Session Minutes -3- February 26, 2001
Councilmember Latz inquired if a fund from the developer's fees could be set up to allow
residents the opportunity to fund tree replacement on private property. Councilmember Sanger
suggested that tree replacement funds could also fund tree planting in Oak Park Village.
Mr Meyer stated that this issue is a matter of policy. In several of the current projects, it is
impossible to replace trees on site. He inquired if the ordinance was current or was staff looking
at revenue raising possibilities. Ms. Jeremiah stated that they are not. She reported three
projects have requested the cash-in-lieu option, but every project is by no means affected with
this problem in regards to tree replacement.
Mr. Harmening stated that several of the City's policies seem to be in conflict. The City
encourages both dense development and tree replacement and tree replacement can be difficult in
such developments.
Mr. Meyer suggested that the ordinance can be crafted to benefit the entire urban city forest and
allow the city flexibility to do so through tree replacement or a cash-in-lieu option.
Council asked staff to adjust the formula to achieve a logical result and formalize a cash-in-lieu
policy. Councilmember Latz asked staff to include a possibility of a low interest loan program
for replacement of trees on private property.
5. Parking Restrictions Enforcement During Snow Removal Operations
Staff reported that they had received good comments about how the city is handling snow
removal this season
Staff also indicated that they were experiencing problems with sidewalk snow removal on
private property Council and staff discussed the issue and recommended that an educational
piece would be appropriate to inform homeowners of sidewalk snow removal policies.
Council discussed the problem that has been experienced this year in regards to ticketing
vehicles in violation of the snow emergency ordinance and the ability of staff to respond to the
violations. They discussed the possibility of authorizing additional staff to issue tickets
Council briefly discussed neighborhood contribution.
6. Communications
Mr. Meyer gave a legislative update.
7. Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 10.25 p.m.
.
. / . 9
/y Clerk 1\43((0
.