HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000/02/14 - ADMIN - Minutes - City Council - Study Session CIS OF OFFICIAL MINUTES
ST.
Louis CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
PARK February 14, 2000
The meeting convened at 7 00 p m
Present at the meeting were Councilmembers Jim Brimeyer, Ron Latz, Chris Nelson, Susan
Sanger, Susan Santa and Mayor Jeff Jacobs
Staff present City Manager (Mr Meyer), Deputy City Manager (Mr Pires), Director of
Community Development (Mr Harmening), Planning Manager (Ms Jeremiah), Economic
Development Coordinator (Mr Kleve), Finance Director(Ms McGann), Public Works Director
(Mr Rardin), and City Clerk (Ms Larsen)
1. Park Commons East - AvalonBay
An summary of the meeting with Mayor Jacobs, Chris Nelson, and senior staff from Avalon Bay
was presented Avalon Bay had originally proposed to be the sole developer for the Park
Commons East pioject and was now interested in collaborating with a commercial developer on
the project Chris Nelson reported that the CEO of Avalon Bay stated that the most feasible
option for obtaining commercial/retail expertise was outsourcing They have now created a
relationship with Grubb & Ellis for consultant and commercial/retail work Councilmember
Nelson felt if Avalon Bay did not have an equity partner, they must self own the property
The Council then discussed the feasibility of Avalon Bay moving forward under the current
structure of the proposed project
Mr Meyer said that Avalon Bay did not wish to seek to another equity partner due to the
difficulties of maintaining such a relationship, stating that they would prefer to retain ownership
Mr Meyer said he would like the project to retain one developer but felt that it does not seem
possible because there are no developers experienced in the kind of mixed use development that
is being created here
Ms Jeremiah reported that staff had encouraged a relationship with Beard group to obtain local
input Mr Harmening stated that Grubb and Ellis brings the component of local community
knowledge to the project He reported that there would be a two tier compensation plan
consisting of up front consultant fees and commission He also said that Grubb and Ellis has
experience in development and will help in the design
Councilmember Sanger inquired what would happen if the City finds the arrangement
unacceptable Councilmember Nelson replied that Avalon Bay said they would remove
themselves from the pi oject with regi et Mayoi Jacobs stated that this is one of the most
significant development projects every undertaken by the city and felt it very important that the
city and developers move forward
Councilmember Brimeyer suggested that Avalon Bay commit to sell the commercial
development early I-Ie felt that a key point was to have a development agreement with Avalon
Bay and design plan within sixty days He also that suggested that the local presence Grubb and
Ellis would bring would be beneficial
Study Session Minutes -2- February 14, 2000
Mr Harmening stated that Grubb and Ellis would like a sign put up to attract interested parties
Councilmember Latz stated that he felt it would make a huge difference whether the commercial
development occurs on Excelsior Blvd or W 38th St
Mayor Jacobs stated his willingness to push the design aspect of the project Councilmember
Latz replied that Grubb and Ellis has a strong incentive to succeed in St Louis Park having many
St Louis Park ties
Councilmember Sanger inquired if Grubb and Ellis had experience in mixed use developments
and wondered if the Beard group could be used Councilmember Nelson replied that the Beard
group could be used as a consultant and added that their staff was very well versed in the
principles of mixed use development Mr Harmening emphasized the need to stick to the
principles of the project
Councilmember Sanger stated that she would like to see Avalon Bay take on more risk Mr
Harmening stated that Avalon Bay was now providing the capital for the project
Mayor Jacobs agreed that the City should hold the developer to the principles of the project
Councilmember Latz stated that the next 90 days would be critical
Councilmember Santa said she wants to revisit the 38th St/Excelsior Blvd idea She also said
that would like Grubb and Ellis on the project right away to give an analysis based on the reality
of the project Mr Harmening replied that Grubb and Ellis will be visiting the Council in two
weeks to discuss the fundamentals of the retail development
The Council then discussed the number of stories the buildings should be and if retail should be
put in versus a live/work situation Councilmember Brimeyer said they should listen to the
market place Councilmember Sanger stated that one of the provisions was to have at least one
mixed use building and felt that there should be more than that Mr Harmening agreed and said
the City will have a significant control over the project
Ms Jeremiah stated that incentives need to built into the project Mr Meyer stated that Avalon
Bay has up to $500,000 already invested in the project
Mr Kleve stated that one key issue is that Avalon Bay never had a leasing partner Mr
Harmening stated that staff will send a letter to Avalon Bay outlining provisions that need to be
met within ninety days and mentioned again that Grubb and Ellis will be at the next study
session meeting
Councilmember Latz asked Council ;f they wanted to go with an outside consultant Mr
Harmening suggested that staff should be given some time to work and come back with
information for the Council Councilmember Nelson stated that he would like information on
traffic in the area of the project Ms Jei emiah r eplied that the information could be provided at
the next study session meeting
Mr Harmening referred to the scope of the work and the range of costs associated with the
project Ms Jeremiah added that an origin destination study was possible
Study Session Minutes -3- February 14, 2000
Councilmember Sanger asked if the t`rafficstud`yc�oul'd,�be used to determine the feasibility of a
pedestrian overpass for the area Ms Jeremiah replied that need would have to be
accommodated by at-grade crossings Councilmember Brimeyer felt the traffic study would
have to present the worst case scenario and then determine if the worst case would be
remediable He also felt that the neighborhoods should be involved in the scope and parameter
of the traffic study
2. Capital Improvement Program/Public Works Projects
Mr Meyer stated that report is in rough draft form because staff will be taking a much more
serious approach to the planning of these projects Mr Pires gave a review of the"ancient
history" perspective of the project
Mr Rardin stated that he would like to hear the Council comments on the handouts for the
capital improvement plan He also hoped to have Council consider the possibility and feasibility
of individual projects, and the possibility of adding more projects
Mayor Jacobs felt the capital improvement plan would be a very valuable tool to the City and
should be developed fairly quickly He also cautioned Council to avoid micro-management of
individual projects
Councilmember Brimeyer said he would like more information on projects initiated by other
departments that could be put into a complete Capital Improvement Plan He also suggested that
expansion in the area of technology and other projects should be added to the list of potential
projects in 2000-01
Councilmember Brimeyer asked if building and joint construction costs involved with the school
district should be reflected in the CIP Mr Meyer replied that those costs are already included
and information from the Park and Recreation department will be added as it is developed He
stated that he would like the CIP to be more comprehensive than past C1P's He also felt that
tentative projects should not be included in the CIP
Councilmember Santa stated her concern over the wording and phrasing of the CIP Mr Pires
replied that such description would be a key component in controlling audience expectations He
added that some projects do not meet the threshold to be placed on the CIP Councilmember
Sanger asked in response what the threshold was Mr Rardin replied that amount of funding
needed would not be the only indicator to add a project to the CIP High profile projects'may`'
also be added
Mr Pires stated that the CIP will contain references, footnotes, and appendices to explain other
projects not included in the CIP He said the abbreviated two year CIP would be available in
spring and the five year CIP would be completed at a later date He added that the operational
and mechanical impact of the projects should be included in the CIP and will be added later
Ms McGann stated that the revenue sources should also be included in the CIP She said that
there were two options for funding General obligation improvement bond and general obligation
special assessment bond She added that neither were subject to levy limitations The CIP will
show funding source and impacts
t :t vE
Study Session Minutes -4- February 14, 2000
3. Evaluation of the Police and Fire Civil Service Commissions
Mr Meyer recommended that the review of these commissions be deferred to the Charter
Commission to act as an impartial third party Council briefly discussed support from the local
unions on this issue and agreed to refer this issue to the Charter Commission Mr Meyer replied
that a resolution would be needed to take that action
4. Communications
Council briefly discussed the retreat and tentative dates to hold it
Councilmember Latz made a suggestion on the direction and focus of the cameras when people
are speaking at Council meetings
5. Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 9 25 p m
C
y Clerk May.
•