Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995/06/05 - ADMIN - Minutes - City Council - Regular MINUTES CITY COUNCIL MEETING ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA June 5, 1995 1. Call to order Mayor Hanks called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. 2. Presentations None 3. Roll call The following Councilmembers were present at roll call: Jeff Jacobs, George Haun, Allen Friedman, Ron Latz, Robert Young, Gail Dorfman and Lyle Hanks. Also present were the City Manager(Mr. Meyer), City Attorneys (Mr Sheehy, Ms. Pace), Director of Community Development (Mr Harmening);Director of Public Works(Mr. Rardin); Director of Parks and Recreation (Mr. Gears). 4 Approval of minutes It was moved by Councilmember Jacobs, seconded by Councilmember Dorfman, to approve the minutes of the May 8, 1995 study session The motion passed 6-0-1 (Mayor Hanks abstained) It was moved by Councilmember Haun, seconded by Councilmember Jacobs, to approve the minutes of the May 15, 1995 Council meeting Councilmember Latz alluded to information Sheldon Johnson has given Council re traffic impacts on Cedar Lake Road. Mayor Hanks said that information will be included in the verbatim transcript of the minutes. The motion passed 6-0- 1 (Councilmember Friedman abstained). , It was moved by Councilmember Jacobs, seconded by Councilmember Haun, to approve the minutes of the May 22, 1995 study session. The motion passed 6-0-1 (Councilmember Latz abstained). 5. Approval of consent It was moved by Councilmember Jacobs, seconded by Councilmember Dorfman, to approve the consent agenda for June 5, 1995. The motion passed 7-0. It was moved by Councilmember Jacobs, seconded by Councilmember Haun, to approve the agenda for June 5, 1995. The motion passed 7-0. PUBLIC HEARINGS 91 6a. Mann Theatre application for theatre license at 5400 Excelsior Blvd There being no one wishing to speak, the Mayor closed the hearing with the right of Council to thereafter reopen and continue it at a future date It was moved by Councilmember Haun, seconded by Councilmember Friedman, to authorize the City Manager to issue a theatre license to Mann Theatres Inc. The motion passed 7-0. Steve Mann, owner of Mann Theatres, addressed the Council. He questioned why his license fee was $2500 based on the size of their complex. He felt this was totally out of line compared to what they are paying for licensing in other communities. Mayor Hanks asked that staff report back to Council on theatre licensing fee structure 6b Fina Gas Station application for 3.2 off-sale beer license at 6405 Minnetonka Blvd. There being no one wishing to speak, the Mayor closed the hearing with the right of Council to thereafter reopen it at a future date. It was moved by Councilmember Friedman, seconded by Councilmember Jacobs, to reject the application as incomplete. The motion passed 7-0. 6c. Conditional Use Permit: Halley's Custom Homes, 3900/3904 Cedar Lake Rd. and 2144 France Ave. The following individuals addressed Council to express their opposition to this project. Medora Perlman, 2109 Ewing Ave. So , Minneapolis, Lynn Levine, 1941 Ewing Ave. So , Minneapolis; Latinalajoy Laramee, 3121 Grand Ave So , #2, Minneapolis,Nancy Gibson, 2712 Glenhurst Ave St. Louis Park.; Susu Jeffrey, 200 Oliver Ave. So , Minneapolis; Gayle Crose, 4000 Highwood Rd., St. Louis Park; Bettey Goodman, 2211 So. Hill Ln., St Louis Park; Heidi Novak, 4141 Vincent Ave. So., Minneapolis; John Grzybeke, 1324 Hanford Ave ; Ed Steinberg, Ted Korzoweski; Kerry Ahlberg(several people did not complete cards and their names are not available.) Dennis Trooien, attorney for Mr. Halley, addressed Council. He addressed a number of concerns expressed in staffs report He commented that a number of comments made by the opposition to Mr. Halley's project were in error. Councilmember Friedman asked when he expected Minneapolis would give their confirmation or non-confirmation to the overflow as part of the resolution from the Watershed District i 92 Mr. Trooien said it was tough to predict what another city was going to do. He said they were working with them now. Everytime he has asked, he has been told the City of Minneapolis has no problem with the project. Councilmember Friedman said it was his understanding that the permit was granted conditioned upon written confirmation that overflow onto Ewing Ave was acceptable to the City of Minneapolis That's the Watershed's resolution. Is that correct? Mr. Trooien said substantively that was correct although he did not yet have a copy of the letter from Minneapolis. He said he could not predict when they would hear from Minneapolis which has had their plans for review for over two months Councilmember Dorfman assumed Mr Trooien was aware that the City of St. Louis Park is bound by the conditions as set forth by the Watershed District as well. Mr. Trooien said he was. There being no one further wishing to speak, the Mayor closed the hearing with the right of Council to thereafter reopen and continue it at a future date It was moved by Councilmember Friedman, seconded by Councilmember Dorfman, to reopen the hearing and to continue it to June 19, 1995 at which time the City of Minneapolis might have given its approval which the Council can then review Councilmember Dorfman wondered if, in an Environmental Impact Study conducted a year ago, had the portion in St. Louis Park been covered Councilmember Friedman said this will give the City an opportunity to look into matters which are of significant concern to him and the matter of the EIS can be included in those concerns Councilmember Young noted the motion was to approve subject to conditions He realized it was felt being subject to conditions was sufficient protection in the past to allow a proposal to go forward. He asked if this was a special or unique situation tonight In other words, is it necessary to wait two weeks. He recalled that some three weeks ago a project was approved in his Ward contingent upon approval being received by the watershed district. Councilmember Friedman, while respecting Councilmember Young's comments, felt that each issue should be examined on its own merits He felt other concerns had come up, that the residents he represents had concerns which he takes very seriously. He felt there were enough unanswered questions he would like staff to resolve before voting in finality Councilmember Dorfman said it was her recollection that when items had been approved conditionally it was based on terms being met by the applicant. In this instance, it is a condition needing to be met by a third party 93 Mayor Hanks felt it important to remember that if it hadn't been for the need to fill, the property would probably have been developed when the rest of Lake Forest was developed The motion passed 6-1 (Councilmember Young opposed) 6d. Alley paving: 2700 block between Salem and Toledo Avenues, Project 94-22 Resolution 95-73 Richard Lang, 2743 Toledo, spoke in favor of the alley paving. There being no one further wishing to speak, the Mayor closed the hearing with the right of Council to thereafter reopen and continue it at a future date It was moved by Councilmember Friedman, seconded by Councilmember Jacobs, to adopt Resolution 95-73 entitled"Resolution ordering Improvement Project 94-22, approving plans and specifications and authorizing receipt of bids for construction of a concrete alley in the 2700 block between Salem and Toledo Avenues" Councilmember Friedman recalled that even though a resident does not have a garage on an alley, they would still be subject to assessment in the future if they did construct a garage Mr. Rardin said there was direct and indirect benefit If you can access your property from the alley, one would be directly benefitted if you can access your property from the rear 111 Councilmember Friedman noted it was tough to put berms on streets and alleys because of winter snowplowing However, one resident of the neighborhood had said rather than raised bumps to control speed, how about if you gouge them Is that possible? Mr. Rardin said he would look into that and get back to Council. The motion passed 7-0 6e. Request of Nortel Cable to transfer control of KBLCOM from Houston Industries to Time Warner Resolution 95-74 Barry Grogan, attorney for the City in cable matters, was present to answer questions. In answer to a question from Councilmember Dorfman, Mr Larson said the Cable TV Advisory Commission had reviewed Mr. Grogan's report and that report would be forthcoming to the Council. Councilmember Friedman asked if there was any reason the Council should look at not agreeing to the requested transfer. 94 Mr. Grogan said the legal, technical and financial qualifications of Time Warner had been reviewed and no basis was found on which the City could support a denial of the proposed transaction. There being no one further wishing to speak, the Mayor closed the hearing with the right of Council to thereafter reopen and continue it at a future date It was moved by Councilmember Jacobs, seconded by Councilmember Dorfman, to adopt Resolution 95-74 entitled"Resolution approving the transfer of control of KBLCOM, Inc from Houston Industries, Inc. to Time Warner, Inc." Councilmember Latz said when he was door knocking several residents had mentioned the lack of cable channels available in the City that are available elsewhere. He wondered when the opportunity to address this would come.. Mr Grogan said the appropriate time to consider amendments to the existing franchise would be at the time of re-franchising Mayor Hanks believed the Citizens Cable TV Advisory Commission was the best route to discuss addition/deletion of channels. The motion passed 7-0. PETITIONS, REQUESTS, COMMUNICATIONS None RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES 8a. Comprehensive Plan Amendment - 1625 Zarthan Ave. (Honeywell site) Resolution 95-75 Mr. Harmening said a resolution changing the land use designation as directed by Council was before them tonight and he briefly reviewed the recommendation presented by staff. Basically, staff was suggesting insertion of new policies within the existing Comprehensive Plan which relates to the redevelopment of the property which would place some limits on the size of commercial development on the site, policies related to limiting parking, promoting open space Encouraged would be quality of design/architecture and mixed uses Secondly the resolution would offer an amendment to the land use map changing the land use classification from industrial classification to a commercial. To this end staff recommends the creation of a C-3 zoning distrist which would address the unique characteristics of the site and the Comp Plan amendments as discussed above. Bill McHale, Ryan Construction, addressed Council. Their concerns remained the timeframe to accomplish the timeline Mr. Harmening laid out vis-a-vis Honeywell's plans and tenants to whom commitments have been made who plan to open in 1996; and talks with staff about creation of a cooperative agreement. He presented two new concept plans both downsized from the original 6 95 plan and incorporating increased green area The concept with increased open space would require assistance from the City in the form of$750,000 to make it work He felt Ryan had addressed some of the concerns they had heard from Council Ben Steinberg, 5801 Cedar Lake Rd , spoke He said he appreciated the changes the developer had made to the original concept plan, however, even though there was a little more green area which was helpful, the proposed project was still too large and residents remain opposed Councilmember Friedman said he had found Bill McHale to be diligent in addressing some of the ' changes Council sought and he had no problem with Ryan Companies or Mr. McHale. He wanted to make two motions. It was moved by Councilmember Friedman, seconded by Councilmember Dorfman, to adopt Resolution 95-75 amending the text of the plan by neighborhood chapter of the Comprehensive Plan and amending the land use designation of 1625 Zarthan Ave. from Light Industrial to Commercial in accordance with the adopted Comprehensive Plan policies and contingent upon approval by the Metropolitan Council Councilmember Young asked if Met Council approval should not be received before Council approves anything. The motion passed 7-0. - It was moved by Councilmember Friedman, seconded by Councilmember Dorfman, to direct staff 111 to initiate amendments to the City's Zoning Ordinance to implement the adopted Comprehensive Plan policies by creating a new C-3 Zoning District with uses permitted by PUD Councilmember Haun referenced a letter dated June 5 from Honeywell and Ryan stating the motions before Council to be unacceptable. Bill McHale said Honeywell and Ryan feel there is no criteria for a C-3 District. They have suggested alternate language, zoning becoming B-2 and development of a cooperative agreement which would lay out specifics. Mr. Sheehy addressed Alternative Motion#2 (passed out to Council) which was a motion to direct staff to prepare a cooperative agreement which could be used under either a C-3 or a C-2 zoning district. It was not determinative of the motions on the table, but drawn up for the Council should they wish to consider it. Councilmember Friedman asked if any of the Council had seen the motion referenced by Mr Sheehy. He felt it was inappropriate and inexcusable. As representative of this district, he did not appreciate being blind-sided by something such as this new Motion#2 Councilmember Friedman called the question The motion failed 1-6 (Councilmember Friedman in favor; Councilmembers Jacobs, Haun, Latz, Young, Dorfman, Hanks opposed). 111i 96 Councilmember Latz asked if there would be any legal obligation on Ryan's part to sign on to a cooperative agreement Mr. Sheehy responded it would be his view that Ryan could take the position that the cooperative agreement be limited to those conditions that are in C-2, i e it would either not be enforceable because it is not required by City ordinance or in the event Ryan agreed to it they could agree only to those land use conditions set forth in C-2. Councilmember Latz said it seemed Ryan was asking to be trusted, but because of the vagueness they sense in the proposed C-3, they ought to be willing to trust the Council to put together PUD requirements which will meet the needs of both Ryan and the City. Mr. McHale said in order for Ryan to know what the criteria is for all parties, they would be willing to continue the motion on the guide plan for 2 weeks and work with staff to develop a cooperative agreement to be approved before any reguiding is done. Councilmember Friedman asked if there was anything in the C-3 that would prohibit the development of either of the 2 plans he submitted. Mr. Harmening said there was not yet language for a C-3. Depending on how the C-3 zoning district is written and how Council views the restrictions to be, it's possible the plans could be acceptable depending on how the regulations for C-3 are written Mayor Hanks said he would not want to see a C-3 created to satisfy the Council. Councilmember Dorfman felt, with all the input from everyone who has spoken to Council, Council's responsibility now is to have a Zoning Ordinance that is in compliance with the Comp Plan. The question what gets the City there? Is it a C-2, a C-3 Her problem with the C-2 was the 3 conditions. access to a roadway identified in the Comp Plan as a collector or arterial so that access can be provided without generating significant traffic on local residential streets; a buffer yard shall be provided along all lot lines abutting property in an R-use district; and all buildings and structures to be set back a minimum of 25 ft. from any abutting propertry in an R-use district There isn't much to work with in the C-2 and C-3 conditions can be written specifically Councilmember Latz said that no matter what, he would want the Council to ultimately control the destiny of the site He reiterated his comments of several weeks ago with regard to his concerns about the impact on the economic vitality of other businesses in the City. He supported an economic impact analysis being done before the any project proceeds much further Councilmember Haun asked if nothing was done tonight to change the zoning, if it was Honeywell's intent to continue to develop the property as light industrial warehouse site Mr Bowen from Honeywell said it would be their intent to move existing leases into the site and at the same time looking with third parties to use the remaining part of the building and thereafter develop a larger part of the site. 97 Councilmember Haun wanted what was best for the community, but he had a hard time walking away from a project that is going to create the taxation that this site will. He felt it was time to make a decision or drop it. Mr. McHale said he was more than happy to work with staff during the next 2 weeks to come up with C-2 or C-3, whatever, as long as their plan or some variation of it fits in Councilmember Jacobs did not want the property revert back to light industrial and certainly a warehouse was not a win for any parties involved. He also was not enamored of the City spending a lot of money on the project. He asked what Mr. McHale felt the City should come up with in terms of a cooperative agreement. Mr. McHale said he didn't think staff could do a zoning ordinance in 2 weeks What they were proposing was that the cooperative agreement would spell out the area staff is concerned about, i e. berming, materials, screening, rooftops, buffers, open space, etc , the areas in the C-2 they don't believe are clear enough or detailed enough. His thought was if Ryan and the City then come to a cooperative agreement and understand what the criteria is, they would then be able to determine if a plan they are proposing would fit Tim Keane, attorney for Honeywell, was present to reassure the City Council that Honeywell does have every interest in working cooperatively with the City in coming up with a reuse of the property of which all parties can be proud. Honeywell's concern with creation of a new zoning district was that the window of uncertainty would be extended probably 2 months He felt a cooperative agreement could also embody proposed amendments to the C-2 district and incorporate parameters, conditions and performance standards that would agreeable to all Councilmember Jacobs asked if the Council had to act on the C-2/C-3 issue this evening He was suggesting that Council delay a decision on whether it is to be C-2 or C-3, identifying the problems Council sees, identify the problems Honeywell and Ryan would like to have identified and make the decision on the 19th Mr. McHale said he only needs to know what will be in C-3 and he had no problem working with staff in the intervening 2 weeks. Councilmember Young asked if a draft of the C-3 zoning standards could be available in 2 weeks Mr Harmening said staff could do that Councilmember Young suggested that Council either withdraw the proposal or vote it down and move to defer for 2 weeks and direct staff to work out a cooperative agreement defining what the C-3 is. The motion passed 6-1 (Councilmember Young opposed). 98 b Second reading of ordinance vacating utility easement along north side of Knollwood Mall (T. J. Maxx addition) It was moved by Councilmember Jacobs, seconded by Councilmember Haun, to defer second reading until the new easement is granted c. Second reading of ordinance re proposed expansion of Pets in Parks program Ordinance No. 95-2032 Councilmember Young felt this was a reasonable compromise between opening up all parks to dogs and not permitting them in any parks. On a trial basis, four parks were opened up and it seemed to work out It seemed reasonable to allow 10 parks out of 60 in the City to have this available. It was moved by Councilmember Young, seconded by Councilmember Haun, to adopt Ordinance 95-2032 entitled"An ordinance amending the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code Section 6-406(1) to establish rules and regulations governing the presence and conduct of pets in the City parks" Councilmember Latz said he had spoken to staff on how they planned to gather data over the summer in order to report back to Council and how they planned to enforce the ordinance Mr. Gears responded that components of the program included education of the public particularly the dog owners, on-going evaluations by part-time and full-time City staff in the field. Enforcement will be as with any other City ordinance with backup from the Police Department if necessary. The motion passed 6-1 (Mayor Hanks opposed). 8d. Second reading of ordinance adopting the Minnesota Uniform Fire Code Ordinance No. 95-2033 It was moved by Councilmember Jacobs, seconded by Councilmember Haun, to adopt Ordinance No. 95-2033 entitled "An ordinance amending the St. Louis Park Municipal Code, Section 8-301 " Minnesota Uniform Fire Code incorporated by reference" The motion passed 7-0. REPORTS FROM OFFICERS, BOARDS, COMMITTEES 9a Request for goose removal from along Minnehaha Creek Irwin Mandel, 3231 Flag Ave. So.; Bob Jorvig, 3200 Hillsboro Ave. So., Len Aberle, 3345 Decatur Ln.., spoke in favor of removal of the geese. 99 It was moved by Councilmember Latz, seconded by Councilmember Young to approve the request with conditions as outline in staffs report. Also that staff initiate a study of a feeding ban of geese in the City Mr. Gears said the Cedar Manor neighborhood has reported at least 50 geese on private property there. He told them about the discussion this evening and that the council may be looking at the option of removal from private property with funding from private sources. He suggested Council might want to broaden its motion to include residents in other neighborhoods. Councilmember Latz agreed and added to his motion that the geese removal program be made available to any neighborhood subject to the same conditions. Mort Lieder, 3337 Decatur Lane, expressed his opinion that the sum of$700 for removal was very modest and that the City should pay it as it is a health hazard, the residents along the creek pay very high taxes which is more of a benefit to the City than what other taxpayers pay The motion passed 7-0. 9b Approval of 1995 budget calendar It was moved by Councilmember Jacobs, seconded by Councilmember Haun, to approve the calendar. The motion passed 7-0. 9c. Application for Minnesota City Participation(First-Time Homebuyers Program) It was moved by Councilmember Friedman, seconded by Councilmember Jacobs, to approve submission of an application for the Minnesota City Participation Program Councilmember Dorfman asked if under MHFA requirements is there any way the City can set aside a certain percent of the recipients to be individuals who are currently City residents Mr. Harmening said the way the program is structured that is not possible. Councilmember Young asked if the program had once been in place, why was it discontinued Mr. Harmening said the program has been around for several years and the City was last involved in 1990. That program related more to providing assistance for rehabing units as well as some down payment assistance.. He believe the reason the City has not recently been involved is because interest rates have been so favorable The motion passed 7-0. I 100 9d. City Engineer's report: W. 39th St. & France Ave. traffic signal system Resolution 95-76 Councilmember Haun said this was initiated by Minneapolis and he would be most interested in seeing the results of the St Louis Park neighborhood meeting It was moved by Councilmember Haun, seconded by Councilmember Jacobs, to adopt Resolution 95-76 entitled"Resolution accepting the City Engineer's report, establishing a public hearing and authorizing a neighborhood meeting for construction of permanent traffic signal system at the France Ave. and W. 39th St. intersection" Councilmember Young said he would certainly want to see strong support from City residents as the City's share of the light would be approximately$23,000. The motion passed 7-0. 9e. Proposed open space study/Development moratorium It was moved by Councilmember Latz, seconded by Councilmember Jacobs, to accept the recommendation in staff's report. Councilmember Young understood this would basically foreclose development on any open space in St. Louis Park for the length of the process. He would prefer something that was less restrictive, perhaps more in the vein of residentially zoned property only rather than foreclosing possibility on commercial or industrial that Council might actually want to see some proposals for development in the next year. . Councilmember Dorfman suggested an interim ordinance be prepared and then go to Planning Commission and Parks and Rec Commission rather than coming to Council. Mr. Sheehy said in discussion with the City Manager that was the intent. Councilmember Haun recalled Council had asked staff to inventory open space and felt that could now be done before a consultant is hired. Councilmember Latz felt this process was long overdue with the City almost being totally developed. He felt it important that stock of the open spaces be taken now. The motion passed 7-0. 9f. Traffic Study No. 499. Traffic,controls at Brookside Ave./W. 42nd St. Councilmember Haun noted this was an important issue to the neighborhood He said there was a problem with children going to Jackley Park at 42nd St. He said there was a stop sign at 41st, put there when the school was a City school He felt it important to order in the 42nd St. stop sign 101 -- and if there is a problem with the one at 41st that in the Fall a neighborhood meeting could be ' held concerning whether or not one of the signs could be removed. It was moved by Councilmember Haun, seconded by Councilmember Jacobs, to install the stop sign at Brookside at 42nd. Mayor Hanks felt that the neighborhood meeting should be held first. Councilmember Young . concurred Councilmember Haun withdrew his motion It was moved by Councilmember Jacobs to move the staff recommendation which would call for a neighborhood meeting Councilmember Haun rephrased his motion, seconded by Councilmember Young, to direct staff to hold a neighborhood meeting as soon as possible and return to Council as soon as possible. The motion passed 7-0. 9g. Traffic Study No. 500: Traffic controls at Minnetonka Blvd./Aquila Ave. Councilmember Latz said this was brought at his request after he received a call from an elderly constituent who was trying to cross Minnetonka at Aquila and was nearly hit by a car heading east on Minnetonka. He asked what was the process of notification to people who bring these sorts of concerns to Council. Mayor Hanks said most generally the Councilmember themselves alert a citizen that it is coming up on an agenda. Mr. Rardin spoke about reflective aspects of upgraded signage in answer to a question from Councilmember Latz. Councilmember Latz said there was a staff comment about installing an advance sign of some sort to indicate a pedestrian crossing ahead and to reduce speed to 20 m p h. He asked Mr Rardin what that was Mr. Rardin said this would be a device to warn drivers there was a pedestrian crossing ahead and they should slow down even if they can't see it That has been requested of the County and he expected that would be approved. It was moved by Councilmember Latz, seconded by Councilmember Young to leave as is for now the traffic controls and that the City pursue with the County the request for the advisory speed plate at 20 m.p.h. and to upgrade the advance signage for reflectivity and color if the State would approve the color change and make whatever appropriate allocations of funds that may be necessary. 102 The motion passed 7-0 9h. Minutes: Board of Zoning Appeals April 27 9i. Minutes: Planning Commission May 3 9j. Minutes: Cable TV Commission May 25 Items 9h-9j received for filing. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 10a. Boards and commissions -None NEW BUSINESS 11 a. Bid tabulation: Ford Rd. reconstruction from Runnymeade Lane to the south frontage road of I-394 Resolution 95-77 It was moved by Councilmember Young, seconded by Councilmember Dorfman, to adopt Resolution 95-77 entitled"Resolution accepting bid and authorizing execution of a contract for -Improvement Project 95-06: Reconstruction of Ford Rd. from Runnymeade Lane to the south frontage road of I-394." The motion passed 7-0. MISCELLANEOUS 12a Damage claims Eleanor Tupper By consent, claim referred to City Clerk and City Manager 12b. Communications from the Mayor Mayor Hanks mentioned a public resource group on linking EDAs and small business to finance economic development. He left the flyer with the City Manager should anyone be interested in attending the seminar. He said a retirement coffee will be held on Thursday for Gloria Morris and Ray Boisvert • On June 14 there is a multi-family housing meeting at City Hall 12c. Communications from the City Manager-None 103 CLAIMS,APPROPRIATIONS, CONTRACT PAYMENTS 13a. Verified claims By consent the list of verified claims prepared by the Director of Finance, dated June 5, 1995 was approved and checks in the following amounts authorized to be distributed: Vendor claims $1,215,211.90 and payroll claims $22,392.98, 13b. Contract payments 1. Final: Kilmer Electric Co., traffic control signal system Amount: $20,219.01 By consent, adopt Resolution 95-78 approving final payment 2 Partial payments: a Toltz, King, Duvall, Anderson. Engineering services Amount: $1,280 40 b Pitt-DesMoines: Elevated water tank No 1. Amount: $11,414 25 c Friedges Landscape: Excelsior Blvd. Streetscape. Amount: $36,198.20 d C.S. McCrossan Construction. Cedar Lake Rd. Amount: $87,779.88 e. Minger Construction. Underground work. Amount. $140,468..99 f. Midwest Asphalt Corp.: Aquila Ave. construction. Amount. $33,870.35 g. Minget Construction. Watermain construction. Amount $20,236 90 14. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 11:30 p m. c6) 4(2 `1 May Lyle Hanks ibiir- 4_,j w.i cjj i ecording Secretary r 1, 104