HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986/05/05 - ADMIN - Minutes - City Council - Regular1. Call to Order
2. Presentations
3. Roll Call
MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
May 5, 1986
The meeting
at 7:30
Hanks
None
was called to order
p.m. by Mayor Lyle
The following Council
present at roll call:
Ronald Backes
Thomas Duffy
Allen Friedman
members were
Keith Meland
David Strand
Lyle Hanks
Also present were the City Manager, City Attorney, Director of Public
Works & Director of Planning.
4. Approval of Minutes
21, 1986 City Council meeting.
The motion passed 6-0.
5. Approval of Agenda
May 5, 1986.
The motion passed 6-0.
It was moved by Councilman Strand,
seconded by Councilman Duffy, to
approve the minutes of the April
It was moved by Councilman Meland,
seconded by Councilman Backes to
approve the consent agenda for
It was moved by Councilman Duffy, seconded by Councilman Strand to approve
the agenda with the following additions: Ile. Community Education budget,
7g. Amhurst traffic study and llf. Temporary traffic control
The motion passed 6-0.
6a. Airport Taxi
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Request of Airport Taxi for additional
vehicle licenses
Nathan Shaw, Airport Taxi, addressed Council with an increase in the
number of licenses from 5 to 20. He said they receive requests daily
to serve St. Louis Park, but are unable to do so because they can't promise
timely service with only five cabs. He said demand for taxi service has
steadily been increasing especially in areas with accelerated development
such as St. Louis Park. He alluded to the volatile nature of the taxicab
-82-
mill
T low
:��
City Council meeting minutes f
May 5, 1986
citing the formation of the Governor's Advisory Committee on Taxicabs
and the Regional Transit Board Taxicab Advisory Committee as being set
up to deal with the current problem and provide better service to the
public. He briefly talked about the attempts of those two committees
to resolve the metropolitan licensing problem which failed. Now they
were back seeking to increase their licensing at the local level.
Councilman Strand asked what substantiation Mr. Shaw had that would
support their request.
Mr. Shaw responded that they keep records on all business conducted by
Airport Taxi, and that on average, they have in the area of 250 calls per
week that they can't handle or handle in a timely manner, that is a 20 -minute
response time.
Mr. Shaw presented figures of number of licenses issued by surrounding
communities.
Bob Janecek, Town Taxi and other companies'official, said they had 40 licenses,
33 _oT which are presently being used. He felt that if business dictated,
they would use 40 taxicabs on the streets, and therefore was in opposition
to the applicants receiving additional licenses. He said he'd like to
see a study done on reciprocity and what effect it would have on the taxicab
businesses rather than just issuing additional licenses.
Councilman Friedman felt customers could be calling another company, thus
other companies' taxis were not being utilized. Relative to the survey,
he questioned if it were sent to all people using taxicabs and felt that
answers to questions such as who uses taxis, how often, what companies
etc. were not sufficiently answered.
Councilman Friedman asked Mr. Janecek if it was his position government
should protect those in the private sector who arrive first from any competitive
enterprise in the same business.
Mr. Janacek said he supported the state and RTB studies and felt that
further study was needed relative to taxicab ratios to population, to requests
and requirements. He felt it was essential some type of ratio be maintained
and cited deregulation of the airlines as an example.
There being no one further wishing to speak, the Mayor declared the hearing
closed with the right of Council to reopen and continue it at a future
date.
Councilman Backes wondered if the Taxicab Advisory Committee might be
reactivated at the next Legislative session, to which the City Manager
said it was really too hard to say at this point. He said it was his understand-
ing that when it came to a vote, some of the area cab companies did not
support the metropolitan -wide licensing concept which was very disappointing
as they went into the whole matter assured of taxi companies' support.
-83-
Councilman Strand asked if staff was aware of receiving complaints because
of insufficient taxi service available, to which the City Manager said
he was not aware of complaints either to the City Clerk or the Police
Department.
Councilman Friedman felt there was insufficient information upon which
to base his vote -- would people call City Hall relative to insufficient
service; are people satisfied with the present service, etc. He felt
it was unreasonable for St. Louis Park to have some 55 licenses while
surrounding communities had in the range of 125 to 300 licenses depending
upon the city. He said he certainly did not want to take anybody's
job away, but he also can't stop anyone from being a private entrepeneur,
that he felt that was not his job as a Council member. He asked if anyone
on the Council could tell him why additional licenses should not be
granted.
Councilman Meland said that prior to licenses being issued to Yellow,
Airport and Suburban, Town Taxi had the only licenses in St. Louis Park.
They were the only provider for an approximate eight-year period when
other providers had withdrawn their service.
Councilman Duffy said he wanted to repeat his comments of two years
ago when he questioned whether it was appropriate for Council to restrict
licenses.
Councilman Strand, quoting from the ordinance, felt there were some
real judgment calls to be made on issuing of licenses. He felt it was
difficult to make a decision without information relative to existing
transportation being effective, probable effect of increased service
on traffic conditions, and character, attitude and experience of applicants.
He felt making this type of decision based to a large extent on the
opinions of cab companies was not appropriate.
Councilman Duffy said he didn't know what more information staff could
possibly provide to help Council in making a decision.
Mayor Hanks said prior to issuance of licenses to Yellow, Airport and
Suburban, he did receive calls from residents complaining they could
never get a taxi. Since the issuance of licenses to those companies,
he's not received one call. He recalled that Council had asked the Legisla-
ture to provide for metropolitan -wide licensing. He felt the policy
in Minneapolis was wrong. He said he would like to know from the communities
which have licensed 200 and 300 licenses how many are actually being
used.
It was moved by Councilman Friedman, seconded by Councilman Duffy to
continue the public hearing to May 19, 1986.
The motion passed 6-0.
6b.Yellow Taxi request Request of Yellow Taxi for vehicle
licenses
James LeTourneau, Yellow Taxi, spoke briefly to Council, mentioning that
their opportunity to serve Metro Mobility was in jeopardy without additional licenses,
There being no one wishing to speak, the Mayor declared the hearing
closed with the right of Council to reopen and continue it at a future
date.
-84-
It was moved by Councilman Friedman,
to continue the hearing to May 19, 1986.
seconded by Councilman Strand,
The motion passed 6-0.
6c. Walker Place project Multifamily revenue bond document
Reso u ion o. - amendment: Walker Place Apartments
project (Dominium Group, Hwy.
7/Pennsylvania Ave./Walker Ave.
There being no one wishing to speak, the Mayor declared the hearing
closed with the right of Council to thereafter reopen and continue it
at a future date.
It was moved by Councilman Backes, seconded by Councilman Strand,
waive reading and adopt Resolution 86-55 entitled A resolution approving
��
an amended finance program for a multifamily rental housing project
under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C."
The motion passed 6-0.
6d.Holiday Inn-Shelard Request of Harry Johnson (Holiday
Reso u 3—n--96--5-6— Inn, Shelard Park) to amend an
existing special permit to permit
expansion of the parking lot
stalls at 9970 Wayzata Blvd.
Rick Patron, 445 Shelard Parkway, said a conversation with MnDOT clarified
where the I-394 freeway will be going but there will be
to the proposed HolidayInn just minor changes
seven stalls. Their request for 109thereforeseems excessive. Hein a loss of saidtheywill have the highest ratio compared to the Park Sheraton and Ambassador f
or existing hotels of parking spaces to rooms.
Councilman Strand asked for clarification of Coach Homes Homeowners' Association
relative to the applicant's request. If Holiday loses 12-30 stalls and
they are given another row for parking providing for approximately a 45
foot buffer between the parking and Coach Homes, they had indicated at
the last meeting that would be acceptable.
Mr. Patron indicated what Holiday Inn was losing in spaces did not justify
their request.
Jerry Romine, Holiday Inn, reiterated their point which is the volume of
business they expect doing necessitating an extension of the parking lot.
Councilman Strand could not understand how they came up with a request
for 109 spaces when maximum 12 are going to be taken and since the floor
plan of the hotel has not changed, what the justification for the request
was.
Steve Laufers, vice president of Shelard II condominiums, said he was '
not in favor of an additional 109 parking spaces.
Vernon Beck, developer of the project, said with the cost of constructing
a parking lot, he could guarantee no developer would put in more spaces
than he felt was necessary.
-85-
There being no one further wishing to speak, the Mayor declared the hearing
closed with the right of Council to thereafter reopen and continue it
at a future date.
It was moved by Councilman Strand to adopt the resolution with the following
amendment: Item 6 would read as follows: "At the discretion of the applicant
and provided there is a permanent taking of the parking stalls on the
south, parking may be expanded to the north to allow the addition of not
more than one additional row of parking containing no more than 60 spaces."
The motion died for lack of a second
It was moved by Councilman Duffy, seconded by Councilman Meland, to waive
reading and adopt Resolution 86-56 as presented calling for the addition
of 60-109 parking spaces as shown on Exhibit H, entitled "A resolution
rescinding Resolution 85-49 adopted on April 15, 1985 and granting special
permit under Section 14-155(3)(q) and Section 14-195(l) of the St. Louis
Park ordinance code relating to zoning to allow the construction of a
198 -unit hotel and Class I restaurant on property zoned B-2 business district
at 9970 Wayzata Blvd."
Councilman Friedman asked if the City Planner had any statistics on ratios of
rooms/facilities to parking stalls. The Planner responded that those ratios
are set forth in the ordinance and all requests are figured on a parking
space per unit 0.5 currently). Then accessory uses, including restaurants,
are compared to the ordinance requirements (currently 1-25 spaces). Thisworks
out to more than 1.5 spaces per unit.
Councilma%t%999ed if a significant problem has been experienced by hotels,
such as the Sheraton Park Place. The Planner said they are experiencing
crowding, but to some extent overflow uses Honeywell's parking lot.
The motion passed 4-1-1 (Councilman Strand opposed; Councilman Backes
abstained).
6 e Sign ordinance Sign ordinance amendment: Project
information signs
There being no one wishing to speak, the Mayor declared the hearing closed
with the right of Council to thereafter reopen and continue it at a later
date.
It was moved by Councilman Duffy, seconded by Councilman Friedman, to
waive first reading, set second reading for May 19 and authorize summary
publication.
The motion passed 6-0.
PETITIONS, REQUESTS, COMMUNICATIONS
7a. Norwestern Tennis raffle
Request of Northwestern Tennis
Association for a one -day
raffle
Jerry Noyce, Northwest Tennis Assoc., explained that the association
is the regional arm of the U.S. Tennis Assoc., a non-profit organization.
The raffle is in support of a women's 35-and—over indoor championship
tournament. The raffle prize is a mink coat.
wo
The purpose of the raffle is to raise money to operate the tournament.
It was moved by Councilman Duffy, seconded by Councilman Backes to receive
the report for filing
The motion passed 4-1-1 (Councilman Strand opposed; Councilman Friedman
abstained).
7b. VFW gambling license Request of VFW Auxiliary
for renewal of its gambling
license
Councilman Backes asked if this was just pulltabs to which the City Manager
said that was correct.
Councilman Friedman asked if it were correct that it was up to the state
to make sure an operation conforms to state law and does the City have
any obligation to enforce state statutes.
The City Attorney said enforcement of the state statutes is up to the
Charitable Gambling Board.
Councilman Friedman asked if the state accepts what the City says and
then just issuesa license or does the state see that they conform.
The City Attorney said perhaps the best way to express the City's role
is as a veto.
P 1
It was moved by Councilman Duffy, seconded by Councilman Meland to receive
the report for filing.
The motion passed 4-2 (Councilmen Backes and Strand opposed).
7c. Suburban Taxi
Request of Suburban Taxi
for additional licenses
It was moved by Councilman Meland, seconded by Councilman Strand, to
set the public hearing for May 19, 1986.
The motion passed 6-0.
7d. Centurion request
Request from Centurion Company
for detachment of St. Louis
Park property at Amhurst
Len Thiel addressed Council to explain Centurion's request for detachment
of two lots located adjacent to Amhurst and their annexation by Minnetonka
for the purpose of building two single-family homes. He said the Amhurst
Homeowners Association was not interested in having its property used
for access.
Mayor Hanks asked if the property was owned by Centurion when Amhurst
was developed, to which Mr. Thiel said it was not. The land was part
of a settlement with the County when the highway interchange was constructed.
It was moved by Councilman Meland, seconded by Councilman Duffy, to refer
-87-
the matter to staff to work with Centurion to try to work something out
and return with a report to Council on May 19.
The motion passed 6-0.
7e. Saltzman request
Request of Neil Saltzman
to amend the City's zoning
ordinance
Mr. Saltzman appeared to explain his request to build a single—family
residence to provide a board/lodging facility for the elderly.
Mayor Hanks said this would involve a rezoning and therefore must go
to the Planning Commission for review.
Councilman Friedman asked why the matter had not gone to the Planning
Commission first. The City Manager said in items such as this that are
in no way covered by the zoning ordinance it has been past practice to
come to Council first to see if the Council sees any merit in even exploring
a request, thereby saving time all around if no merit was found.
It was moved by Councilman Strand, seconded by Councilman Friedman, to
refer the matter to the Planning Commission for review.
The motion passed 6-0.
7f. Apple Valley Red -E -Mix
Request of Apple Valley Red -E -Mix
to permit construction of
a new facility
Jeff Stephenson, representing Apple Valley addressed Council. He discussed
briefly the site on Cedar Lake Rd. which had been discussed as a possible
site for relocation of the plant. It was Apple Valley's understanding
the City was concerned about left-hand turns into and out of the proposed
site. It was his position AVR was willing to work out some sort of restrict-
ions on these turning movements. He was therefore confused as to why
this alternative was no longer viable. He viewed the recommentation in
staff's report of placing a new building on the present site provided
there be amortization of the new facility as new to them, and they were
not in a position to discuss it at this point. He felt the relocation
to the new site could be termed a settlement of litigation.
Councilman Strand asked if it were correct that Apple Valley was not
interested in rebuilding at the current site. Mr. Stephenson said it
was his clients understanding that discussions were on-going, that nothing
definite had been decided at this point. He particularly was not in a
position to discuss rebuilding on the present site relative to amortization
of the plant.
Councilman Friedman asked if Mr. Stephenson was under the impression
the City Manager did not adequately inform him as to what was going on
and that the Council was not aware. Mr. Stephenson denied this indicating
that he was only saying he would have preferred earlier input as to what
was contained in Council's report from staff.
-At-
Councilman Friedman said he wanted to make it clear to anyone who was
not aware of it that Council has spent a good deal of time discussing
this issue in recent months and was indeed fully aware of all aspects
of the matter.
It was moved by Councilman Friedman, seconded by Councilman Meland, that
staff and the City Attorney work with representatives of Apple Valley
Red -E -Mix to implement alternative No. 3 which does not preclude any
further discussion on alternative sites.
Councilman Strand asked the City Attorney to as expediently as possible
respond to Council as to whether or not the amortization will allow termina-
tion of the use and what the likelihood of success would be if challenged.
The motion passed 6-0.
19. Amhurst traffic study Councilman Backes said the
Amhurst Association has some
ideas relative to traffic
control signs and some parking restrictions to help resolve some problems
the complex is experiencing. They would appreciate the assistance of
staff to evaluate those suggestions and provide input.
It was moved by Councilman Backes, seconded by Councilman Meland, to
authorize staff to work with the Amhurst Association on traffic control
measures and parking and to authorize staff participation in a neighborhood
meeting.
The motion passed 6-0.
RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
8a. Variance: 3100 Nevada It was moved by Councilman
eso u on - Meland, seconded by Councilman
nd
adopt Resolution 86-21 entitled "A resolution granting ve toovaria variance readyin side
yard setback from Section 14-133(3) of the ordinance code relating to
zoning to permit the construction of a garage in a side yard abutting
a street having a setback of 1.5 feet instead of the required 15 feet
for property located in the R-2 single family residence district at 3100
Nevada Ave."
The motion passed 5-1 (Councilman Backes opposed).
8b. Traffic -signal assessments
eso u on8V-58
Resolution establishing traffic
signal assessment policy
It was moved by Councilman Duffy, seconded by Councilman Backes, to waive
reading and adopt Resolution 86-58 entitled "Resolution establishing
a special assessment policy for traffic signal improvement projects."
The motion passed 6-0.
-89-
8c. DABCO final plat It was moved by Councilman
Resolut—i-o—n-W-759 Duffy, seconded by Councilman
Meland, to waive reading
and adopt Resolution 86-59 entitled "Resolution giving approval for final
plat of DABCO Addition."
The motion passed 6-0.
REPORTS FROM OFFICERS, BOARDS, COMMITTEES
9a. PUD: Shelard Park Request for a preliminary
PUD, planned unit development,
for Shelard Park
Councilman Backes said he would abstain from this item.
It was moved by Councilman Meland, seconded by Councilman Strand to approve
the preliminary PUD plan for further evaluation.
The motion passed 5-0-1 (Councilman Backes abstained).
9b. Time transfer station Report on neighborhood meeting
regarding a time transfer
station
Residents of the immediate neighborhood, Mike Hinden, 7708 13J Lane,
Catherine Beckman, 1428 Texas and Howard Voight, 7709 13} Lane spoke
in opposition to this plan. The main concerns were safety of the neighbor-
hood's children, their desire to maintain a residential environment
and undesirable traffic that would be generated. Mr. Voight spoke of the cost
considerations of the neighborhood site vs. the Jim Lupient property
in which the MnDOT and RTB's figure for the Lupient property was virtually
identical to that of the property containing the homes. He said they
were told the Lupient property was rejected because it was exorbitantly
priced and therefore, the 131 Lane site was selected.
Councilman Strand said there were two inconsistencies in the plan presented
at the neighborhood meeting: 1) The cost estimate of the Lupient site,
which it is now determined cost no more than the St. Louis Park site;
2) The designation of preference first off was the Lupient site. Then
at the next meeting, the preferred site became the St. Louis Park site. He
felt the appropriate action would be for the Mayor or City Manager write
a letter to the relevant agencies involved and request answers to the
questions raised by the neighborhood and Council and that no action
be taken prior to returning to Council with those answers.
It was moved by Councilman Strand, seconded by Councilman Friedman,
to table consideration of the proposed time transfer station and request
that the Mayor or City Manager send a letter to the relevant agencies
requesting answers to the questions that have been raised, especially
as relates to the inconsistencies in site preference and that we presume
no action will be taken until those questions are answered.
The motion passed 5-1 (Mayor Hanks opposed).
9c. Belt Line Business Park
Resolution86-54
Agreement waiving special
assessment hearing requirement
for Belt Line Business Park
It was moved by Councilman Meland, seconded by Councilman Backes, to
waive reading and adopt Resolution 86-54 entitled "Resolution approving
agreement concerning assessment for Improvement Project 85-05, Sanitary
sewer at 36th St. from Belt Line Blvd. to Monterey Ave."
The motion passed 6-0.
9d. Lenox Community Center Traffic study 353: Lenox
Community Center
It was moved by Councilman Meland, seconded by Councilman Duffy to set
a neighborhood meeting.
The motion passed 6-0.
9e. Parking: Lake/Dakota/Library Lane
Summary of parking restrictions
from Lake St., between Dakota
and Library Lane
It was moved by Councilman Meland, seconded by Councilman Duffy, to
set a neighborhood meeting and direct further study.
The motion passed 6-0.
9f. Park and Recreation Commission minutes
g. Cable TV Advisory Commission minutes
h. Planning Commission minutes
i. HRA special meeting minutes
j. 1985 Financial Report
Items f thru j ordered filed by consent.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
10a. Boards and Commissions
NEW BUSINESS
Ila. Bid tab: Front end loader
sible bid of Ziegler, Inc. in the amount
and production option package.
None
It was moved by Councilman
Backes, seconded by Councilman
Duffy to accept lowest respon-
of $84,755 for equipment costs
The motion passed 5-0-1 (Councilman Strand abstained)
llb. Canned pop machine licensing
Amendment to ordinance code
related to canned pop machine
licensing
It was moved by Councilman Duffy, seconded by Councilman Friedman, to
waive first reading of the ordinance, set second reading for May 19,
1986 and authorize summary publication.
The motion passed 6-0.
llc. Cable TV proposed transfer
Proposed transfer of cable
system to Nortel Associates
It was moved by Councilman Duffy, seconded by Councilman Backes, to
determine that St. Louis Park subscribers could be adversely affected
by the transfer and set a public hearing for June 2, 1986.
The motion passed 6-0.
lld. Bid tab: Recycling It was moved by Councilman
Duffy, seconded by Councilman
Meland, to designate Watkins
Su
as the most responsible bidder and authorizeAircraft execution of anport agreementoducts
The motion passed 6-0.
Ile. Community Education budget
Education budget.
The motion passed 6-0.
llf. Brookside traffic controls
signs be placed on Colorado Ave. and
be placed on W. 41st and Brunswick
work is completed in September 1986.
The motion passed 6-0.
12a. Claims
12b. Communications from Mayor
on the May 12 study session.
It was moved by Councilman
Meland, seconded by Councilman
Strand, to adopt the Community
It was moved by Councilman
Duffy, seconded by Councilman
Backes, that three-way stop
W. 41st St. and two-way stop signs
and that the signs be removed when
MISCELLANEOUS
The study session agenda was discussed.
None
Mayor Hanks suggested discussion
of the HRA matter be placed
It was moved by Councilman Backes, seconded by Councilman Meland that
any Council members wishing to attend the AMM conference be reimbursed.
The motion passed 6-0.
He said the Rotary dedication of the Showmobile to the City would occur
on Monday, May 12 at 12:45.
12c. Communications from the City Manager
The City Manager said he and the Mayor would be on a panel at the Duluth
conference re Council/City Manager relations.
-92-
CLAIMS, APPROPRIATIONS, CONTRACT PAYMENTS
13a. Verified claims
It was moved by Councilman
Meland, seconded by Councilman
, Eoof verified claims prepared by the Director offfy Finance ap dated prove tMay he 1i5,
1986 in the amount of $508,656.34 for vendor claims and $6,458.27 for
payroll claims and that the City Manager and City Treasurer be authorized
to issue checks in the appropriate amounts.
The motion passed 6-0.
13b. Contract payments
Final
It was moved by Councilman Meland, seconded
by Councilman Strand, to waive reading and adopt Resolution 86-60 entitled
"Resolution accepting work on access for the Handicapped", David Volkmann
Construction in the amount of $17,263.35.
The motion passed 6-0.
It was moved by Councilman Meland, seconded by Councilman Duffy to approve
the following partial payments:
Layne Minnesota, Nell No. 1 abandonment. Amount: $20,133.88
Tenyre Coatings, water tower reconditioning. Amount: $38,000
The motion passed 6-0.
14. Ad ournment
a. , dc�®rg et�eary
-93-
It was moved by Councilman
Friedman, seconded by Councilman
Duffy to adjourn the meeting
at 10:17 p.m.
0 or