HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979/10/02 - ADMIN - Minutes - City Council - Regular..�/"'.�'��_.. - -_' � ._'.�
X.
2.
3.
Call to Order
Present�tions
Ro 11 G� 1.1
MII�UTES
��TY C�O�JNCII, MEETING
ST � LOUIS PAI�K, MIN�IESCITA
October 2, 1fl79
A regula7 meetin� of th� City Gounci� was called
to oxde�r 1ay Mayor Hpward at 7:30 p.m,
None�
The �ol�ow�ng CQuncilmet� were p,re$en�. at ro11
cal,� :
RAr�a1d Backes
Jerro�ld Martin
John Ralles
C,ouncilman Hanks arri�ted a� 9:1+0 ,p.m.
Martt�a Elst��om
I�e�th Meland
Frank Howard
Also pres�n��wexe the City M�nagsr, City At'tprney,
City Engit�e�r and City Assesso�.
4 . App rov�a 1
of Minu.�es
pi-.rgc�tq�* of Planning,
�� was �nQved by C�ou�cilman �Ralles, second�ed by
�Council�an Backes,�to gRp'�ove the miputes of the
Ci�t� Couneil, meetings held �Sep��mber '4, 10, 15
and 17, 1979, amended as follqw�s:
Minut�s �of Septe�nber 4,
(Councilma.n Meland was
�c��g .� �e vote pn o£emo�e) ,�d 9e was 6-4
r�at present at ti.me �
Amend Page 278, second paxagXaph� "It was
Minut�es o�� �eptember 10, �-9�9 � er d.ay £�n� .b� susp��ded. The
moved by Councilman Martin C��a� ther�$500 p
motion fail�d for lack of a second.
er 15 1979 - Cpuncilman �ackes was not ptasen� during
Minutes of Sept�mb �
th� F�ir�st �po�g�ion o�f �t�he meeting.
The moti'on passed 6�-0 •
�a. Approv�l
of da
Counc 'i1ma� �aci::es , s econded by
T,t w�s moved by to a�Prove the �ar.sent agenda
Caunci�.ma�, E15 trom,
���.pc�ober 2, 197�� as,Pre�Ented.
T�e motipr} p�.sSed �-4••
seconded by Councilman Meland, to
e aaditio� a�� ��tem lOg�
I� was moved ounci,lman ,Ra11es� 979,
�y � obe� 2.� 7.. with ��
approv� �tfie agenda far 4�� ������.non 'Aven�e`
Naegele B�1�board at H}gl�Wa�
xhe mo G i,or� pa s s ed 6-�.
6a . Rev�_...-'e-
Stlarin _
Counc�l m�nutes, October 2, 1979
City •
PUBLIG HEARINGS
Revenue sharing entitlement tunds, as described
in Notice of Hearing published September 19, 1979.
There being
M�yor declared the hearing closed.
no one present wishing to speak, the
it was moved by Councilman Meland,
approve the proposed use of revenue
1979-1.980. �
The motion passed 6-0.
6b. Project 77-11A;
Resolution No. 6378
seconded by Councilman Ralles, to
sharing entitlem�nt funds for
Assessment, Project 77-11A, Candlestick Park area
paving, as d�scribed in Noti�e of Hearing
published September 26, 1979.
The City Council was informed the City Assessor has made a before and
aFter market improvement valuation analysis on each of the assessed
parcels in the pro�ect and is of thetheltotaltamountlofsthesspecial
enhance the value of the par�els by ,
assessment. �
There being no
hearing closed.
one present wishing to speak,�the Mayot declared the
It was moved by Councilman Ralles, 5econded by Councilman Martin, to
waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 6378, entitled "Resolution
adopting assessment, Improvement No. 77-11A."
The motion passed 6-0.
Later in the evening (8 p.m.) the Mayor permitted Rob ert Ehrenbe.rg to
read'a statement protesting the assessments of Projects 77-11(A)&($) to
the properties owned by Grace E. Freidheim and urging the Council to not
adopt the assessment role during the meeting. The statement was
received for placement in the project f iles.
6c. Project 77-11B;
Resolution No. 6379
Assessment, Project 77-11B, Vernon/Cedar Lake
Road/Highway 12 paving, as described in Notice
of Hearing published September 26, 1979.
The Council was informed the City Assessor has made a.before and after
market improvement valuation analysis on each of the assessed parcels
in the project and is of the opinion that all a5sessments enhance the
value of the parcels by the �otal amount of tl�e special assessment.
There being no one present wishing to speak, the Mayor declared the
hearing closed.
It was moved by Councilman Martin, seconded by
reading and adopt Resolu�ion No. 6379, entitled
assessment, Improvement No. 6379."
The motion passed 6-0.
,
-314-
Councilman Ralles, to waive
"Resoluti�n adopting
��,___..
City Council minutes, October 2, 1979
. ,
bd • PrO ec t 78-01, ssessment , Pro� ect 78-p1, Park Knoll axea
Resolutlon No. 6380 SeptemberS26escribed in Notice of Hearing publis
, 1979. hed
The City Council was informed the City Assessor has made a before and
after market improvement valuation analysis on each of the assessed
parcels in the pro�ect and is of the opinion that all assessments
enhance the value of the par.cels by the total amount of the special
assessment.
A, C. Guz2i, 3501 Rhode Island �Avenue, stated several hoies exist in
the street which are becoming larger and which during the winter will
become worse . �ie said a crack also exists i.n the curb and gutter. He
asked the total cost of the project computed for 20 years at 7 percent
interest.
Mayor Noward directed the Engineering Department to check and correct
any faul�s prior to win�er. The City Manager e�cplained the streets are
guaranteed for 20 years, and the problem would be corrected. �
Ken Schneider, 3544 Quebec Avenue, requested four-way stop$ on Quebec
Avenue/West 35 Street and signs indicating two-ton load limits to ensure
residential traff ic only. He also requested an explanativn of, in his
opinion, an in�onsistency in his assessment and that for the property at
3601 Quebec Avenue.
Councilman Meland explained that upon completion of improvement
proj�cts, staff routinely reviews the need for additional regulations.
Mayor Howard requested that the City MaIIager provide a report to the
Ward Councilman on City alternatives or policies which could prohibit
commercial traff ic from disrupting residential areas late at night�
The City Assessor explained the frontage, etc., used to compute the
assessmenC for 3601 Quebec Avenue.
Eugene G�uhlke, 3420 F�hode Island Avenue, said he would l.ike to see
consistency in work and fo�low-through when placing sod. I�e explained
one-half of the sod was laid on his property, then the w�rkers were
relocated; the sod was not watered�and began to die. He continued that
upon completing the project, the contractor did not ro�l tl�e area nor
water correctly, and the sod is not healthy. He suggested conr_ractors
Should have an employee available tp review the con�diai�nCitytHal�l�d�
so the properCy owner does not find it necessarY t
William Lewis 3531 Rhode Island Avenue, s�ated.he"had �i���a� ��t�d the
problems with�sod. He also cYted poor street d�airiage�and sugg
curb was v 1. He also believed he had 34 feet of fro�tage, and
no t le e
the assessment records �ndicate�4S feet.
' be required to r�Place dead sod;
Mayor yoward stated Che contrattor wi11 e3r5 and
he also expla�ned that the streets ax'e gua�anteed far l0 y.
Will be corrected. .
-315-
-,--� - . � .
City Cauncil minutes, October 2, 1979
The City AsseSsor stated the fig
ures would be reviewed
He said Mr. Lewis
assessment corrected if nea�dsaof.driveway apron.
assessed for four square y
'Mayor Howard asked
findings.
and the
is also being
that Mr. Lewis be noCif ied in writing of the
Responding to a question from Mayor Howard, the City Manager explained
the Council granted a waiver to the liquidated damages clause of the
contract, in that the contractor's p�rformance was affected by a cement
shortage.
Linda Larson asked if Ms.
and disabled was eligible
Viola Sellin, 3401 Quebec Avenue, who is 64
for deferment of the assessment.
The City Assessor explained persons are
therefore, he explained her assessment
of which could be deferred.
There being no one further wishing
hearing closed.
eligible upon reaching age 65;
for the next year, the balance
to speak, the Mayor declared the
Councilman Meland noted the as,sessment�role includes conferring side-
street benefits to properties located south of the midblock line between
West 36 and 37 Streets at Sumter, Rhode Island, Quebec and Pennsylvania
Avenues. He believed the side-street asses�ment should be removed from
those properties, in that they will be assessed upon the proposed
improvement of West 37 Street.
Councilman Martin concurred; he also recommended wh enever staff deviates
from standard side-street policy, this be reported to the Council.
The City Assessor explained that due to the
blocks in the interior project, he deviated
street policy in accordance with a previous
equalizing the rate per front-foot benefit
lots. He said if paving, curb and gutter i
Street, properties would only be assessed f
lots .
ir�egular distances of the
frorn the standard side-
Council resolution of
to a uniform r�te for interior
� installed on West 37
or direct benefit of corner
It was moved by Councilman Meland, seconded by Councilman Martin, to
waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 6380, entitled "Resolution
adopting assessment, Improvement No. 78-Q1," amended to not assess
side-street benefit to the south one-half of Pennsylvania, Quebec,
Rhode Island and Sumter Avenues between West 36 and 37 Streets.
Responding to Councilman Elstrom, the City Assessor explained the
additional money to pay for the project will be taken from the general
fund.
The motion passed 4-1-1 (Councilman
abstained),
Later, Peter
assessments
assessments
Elstrom opposed; Councilman Ralles
Jgn, 3628 Quebec Avenue, compared his
for property owned in Minnea�olis. He
a�'e almos t Cwice that of Minneapol is ,
-316-
assessment wi[h
safd St. L�uiS pRrl�
and he �sked how
----- ----�°-'•`"..� -�
. r�'-""""""'"_
City Council minutes, October 2, 197g
St. ��is PaXk computes assessments.
y.��.qr Now'ard stated that without knowledge of the Minneapalis
Specifications, one could only speculate upon the difference. He said
the Assessor has computed a proportionaLe sha�e on an equal�and fair
He su ested Mr. J n •
basis. gg $ provide the City Engineering Department
with data indicating why the Minneapolis assess�ent was lower; he noted
the �ssessment had also been reduced by $281, due to Councilman Meland's
mo t ion .
�e. Project 78-02;
Resolution No. 6381
Assessment, Project 7g_02, plorth Eliot paving,
as de5cribed in Notice of Heazing publis�ed
September �26, 1979.
There being no one present wishing to speak, the Mayor declared the
hearing closed.
it was moved by Counci�.man Ralles, seconded by Councilman Meland, to
waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 6381, entitled "Resolution
adopting assessment, Improvement No. 78-02."
The motion passed 6-0.
bf . Proj ect 78-33 ;
Resolution No. 6382
Assessment, Project 78-33, alley paving, West
26 to 27 Street between Xenwood and We�ster
Avenues, as described in Notice of Hearing
publisYied September 26, 1979.
The Council was informed the Gity Assessor has made a before and after
market improvement valuat ion analysis on each of the�assessed parcels in
the project and is of the opinion 'that all assessments enhance the
value of the parcels by the total amount of the:sp�cial assessment.
Roger Mel,lman, . 2604 Webster; the resident at 26'4�8 Webster; Doug Gullifer,
2608 Webster, stated it had been their understanding when signing the
petition; that the cost to each property owner would be from $4 to $5
per running foot; they were also of the impression that the petition
was to r.equ.�st an estimate of the co�t.
The City Manager submitted the petition contained within tre project
file and said it did not refer to cost. He said the e�timate at the
time of the improvemen t hearing was $16,914—the aceepted low bid was
$18,845.
Councilman Elstrom said 5he aCtiended the neighbori:ood meeting prior to
the ublic he rin on the roje�t�, �and the estimatcd co�t was presented
p a g P
at that time. �
Councilman Martin su esCed that'Che resident who ci�'cula�ed the _
gg
Petition stated an incorrec� ��igure,
ert oTanei'may circulate a petition; the
M�YOz Howard explained an� prop Y
City does not.
• ci �y Cc��tnc�.:1 tn:inuLe�,
�tr. G��l.li.f��l s�td thc con�.rnc�or
rt�yc�r iic�wr;rd
pctoUer 2, 19�9
left 80 feet o� unimproved section,
c�equi5�ed �he Ctty Engineer
"('h�re hc�ic�� no
ht�i�r�in� clr��ed.
ko inspect the area.
�,Yle ft�rthex wi�h�n� to speak, the Mayar declared the
Couilci 1mr�n MarGin, seconded
It W�� n�oveti by 6382
w�ive t-e�d��xlfi .�n� fl�o�t Reso�ution No• �
acioptinfi �ss�ssment, Improvement No. 78-33•��
The moCion passed 6-0.
6g. Pro'ect 78-37; Assessment, Froject
Resalution No. 6383 road, as described
published September
Tliere being no
' hearing closed.
by Councilman Backes, to
entitled "Resolution
78-37, Highway 18 frontage
in Notice of Hearing
26, 1979.
one presen�. wishing to speak, the Mayor declared the
It was moved by Councilman Ralles, seconded by Councilman Martin, to
waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 6383, entitled "Resolution
adopting assessment, Improvement No. 78-37."
The motion passed 6-0.
6h. Pro� ect 78-37;
Resolution No. 6384
Assessment, Project 77-63, street lighting,
West 35 Street from Highway 100 to Belr Line
Boulevard, and Raleigh Avenue from West 36 to
35 Streets.
The Council was informed the City Assessor has made a before and after
market improvement valuation analysis on each of the assessed parcels in
the project an8 is of the opinion that all assessments enhance the value
of the parcels by the total amount of the special assessment.
Robert Ehrenberg said it was his understand ing t�jat
project benefit woulc] be assigned to Wolfe Park. He
to pretty much benefit the entire area and suggesCed
a per-acre or square-foot basis.
a portion of the
believed the project
it be assessed on
The City Assessor explained that lights were not installed on 9e1t
Line Boulevard. Properties vhich are illuminated are assessed �ndirecC
benefit and the balance on the basis of front-foot fo�r direct benefit.
The property owner at 4905 West 35 Street said she was not no[ified o�
the public hearing y�hich was held Oc[ober 3, 1977, al[hough she
acquired a contract- for deed in Jur�e, 1977, She stated the prc�peTty
benefi[s by the lighkfng but noted [he sod had not been xe laced.
P
The Citq Manager said the matter would be
would be �replaced .
�.�
-318-
inves[�gated and ihe sod
�
� '
C�ty Council minutest pctober 2, 1979
Zn response to Mayor Howard,
maiied to the last propert�
the City would not be aware
the City Assessor explained notices were
owner of record; if a sale is not recorded,
of the current owrier.
The City Manager stated the notice of the improvement heaxing was •
� mailed to W. H. Shaefer, the former owner of the building.
There being no one
hearing closed.
furthex� wishing to speak,
the Mayor deelared the
It was moved by CounGilman Meland, seconded by Councilman Elstrom, to
waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 6384 entitled "Resolution
adopting assessment, Improvement I�o, 78_37,��
The motion passed 6-0.
6i. Raymond Var�,ance;
Resolution No. 6385
Applica,tion of Leslie Raymond for variance in
rear setback a� 5724 West 36 Street, as described
in Not�ce of Hearing published September 19, 1979.
There being no one present wishing to speak, the Mayor declared the
hearing clos�d. ,
It was moved by Councilman Meland, seconded by Councilman Martin, to
waive readi�g and adopt Re$olution No. 6385, er►titled "A resolution
granting v�ariance in rear yard setback from Section 14-173(6) of the
Ordinance �ode rglating to zoning to permi� a rgar yard Setback of �,67
feet insCead of the required ten feet in the I-1 District at 5%24
West 36 Street, under specified cqnditions."
The motion passed 6-0.
6j. Chapman
Zoning Change
;
Application of Loyal Chapman �or zoning change
f rom residential to husiness at 9500 Minnetonka
Boulevard, as d,escri�ed in Noti�e o£ Hearing
published September 19, ],979.
Councilman Ra12es reported tha� the applicant conk�ered him prior to
the meeting, s�ating it is not his intention to cl��nnge the zoning, and
if he is unable to purchase Che four �butt�ing lo�s �t a reasonable
price, �e will nor proceed w ith his plans; therefore, he requested the
Council to continue the hearing to November 5, 1979.
Councilman Martin asked
the zoni�g, in ttiat the
uae but to a future use.
if �he use Cou1d be pex'rnitCe� withouG changing
residente' concerns rels�k�e not to the proposed
The Plannin Director e�cplained the presenr zonin� daes n.ot a11Uw the
g at�on; the
operation of an art studio, except as a home occup ation.
aPplicant�s proposal does not meet. tlie requirements fpr a home occup
LeRoy Freiborp, �930 �ndependence Avenue,
zoning change.
-319-
$poke in oPPQsiCion tio�the
City Council minutes, actober 2, 1979
There being no one
hearing closed.
f urther w�shing
It Was moved by Councilman Meland,
reject the rezoning re�uest.
The motion passed 6-0.
6k. Meadow Tree
Reassessment
to speak, the Mayor declared the
seconded by Councilman Backes, to
Reassessment,
from June 18,
17, 1979).
Meadow Tree Addition (continued
July 16, August 20, 5eptember 4&
The City Attorney stated the memorandum provided
the attorney's opinion on the matter, and it is
the assessments for collection.
to the Council indicates
appropriate to certify
lierbert C. Davis, representing the property owner, requested a copy
of the memorandum, and said it was his understanding that the City
Attorney takes the position there was a valid assessment of the improve-
ments. Ne said the property was originally forfeit f.or taxes to the
State; the City requested it be deeded to the City for its use and held
it until tt�e early 1970s, during which'time the subjPct improvements
were, ordered by the CiCy. The improvements in�luded grading and the
installation of water. The land was then transf erred to the State and
acquired by his client's predecessor. He concurred with the statement
at the public offering that some special assessments were owed, but noted
his client discovered that one of the improvements was the installation
of a watermain which was not constructed so as to provide connections
to serve the properties. In addition, a storm sewer is in such a position
next to the watermain which prevents use by the prop�rty; therefore, he
submitted that any benefit of the improvement cannot be used by the
purchaser.
Mr. Davis distributed an opinion dated September 13, 1979, from
DeWayne C. Olson Consulting Engineers, Inc., which suggested that to
minimize costs of existing street and curb replacement, the sanitary
sewer be constructed in back of the curb. He concluded by stating it
is the responsibility of the governing body to deal with its own
properties carefully; that when the City orders useless improvements
which require duplication in order for the property to be used, it
owes a responsibility in defraying some of the costs for the deveioper.
Follo�ing further discussion, the Mayor declared the hearing closed.
Councilman Martin asked if any of the proposed $39,900 assessment
benefits the property. The City Manager said it is the contention of
staff that the entire proposed assessment benefits the property. He
noted the resolution did not contain an assessment for sanitary seKe�•
M�. Davis said it is the contention of his client thak because the
City installed the �ermanent surface on the street, it wou�d be
contrary to Che City's o� pol�cy to excavate the street in order �o
install sanitary sewer. H� said when he asked to review the Cit�•�a
records to determine wh�t proportion of the radin c�sts was nece.ss�r`�
for su � , he was advisedgthe records were destra��'���
pp�rt of the wate�main
-320-
c...-•y"•�--• -�r`-yr._-..
- �*"-3'Mflt�q`- _ _
�
�
„�,,,�,,,_.�..'_
� _�. _.�__ _ _ -- - ---- - �- -
��«� Cou►lcil minutes, October 2, �g79
tr turther discussion, Councilma❑ Meland moved to tiaive
� c t�. Y g reading and
�dopt the resolution certif in the assessment,
The ,a�otiun failed for lack of a�econd.
�t ,�as moved by Councilman Martin, seconded by CounciLaan flackes, to
Yefet the it�m to staff to negotiate with the o�mer as to relief,
follok•ing which slternatives would be presented to the City Council
f�,� �c t ion .
The �otion passed 6-0.
�L, I�ousin Pg lan; Housing plan (continued from September 4 and
ttesolution No. 63$6 17, 1979).
There being no one present wishing to speak,
the Mayor declared the hearing elosed.
It was moved by Councilman Martin, seconded by Councilman Meland, to
waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 6386, entitled "Resolution
approving [iousing P1an and Pxogram, 1979-1981.”
The motion passed 6-0.
7a. Business
Women
PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
A proelamation designating National Business
� Women's Week was approved by consent.
�b. France France Avenue north of Excelsior Boulevard;
Avenue Coimnunication from Gearge DuFour.
The City Manager reported the stree� is currently
being constructed per order of the Council.
George DuFour stated that approximately
seven or eight years in the
past, an application was made to rezone the former Acme Lumber Company
site (3200 France Avenue) to residential. Ne said the request was
opposed by the residents who wanted the propert}- to remain zQned
industrial; therefore, he sugg�sre� 3 nine-ton ��aCe��P��he}'areald be
in keeping with industrial zoning and the Pz�tez�t
residents� and he believed they shou_ld suppo�t th� he��vi�r weight.
M�y�r Howard
residents d 1d
site.
explained, that
so to prevent
�osi.t� residenCi.al 4oning> tlie �rea
when oPE �
the location o.f apartment buil�in�s on the
� ' � �C? C�t1' ��O1�C)' ♦
Mayor HowaXd and CowlciZman Back�� notec� thol ����nG�`�b�bR��t.��zd tc, tt�e
the addi.rional cost to upgrRde the s�reet ,cA��e��ed �1z ��,x ���nt foot
re9iden�ial pr�operties whi�h a�e current�.)
for screet GonstrucCioil. r�F� ��
Re9pondin� la � question from C�uncilmnn
�'�Y the aciditior�al co�t.
rt��x-t�r , rix . nt�r,�t�r ��
(aiCy C�urtcil.
m:�tlu���� Oc;Gober 2, ].919
1i Cot��lc:il.mnr� r�alt�{ti, gecondr.d by C�uncil.man 13�ckeg,
LC w,�:: ntovt'd Y
�; al�c�� Av��n��' t►orrh p� �xce.lsic�x �O���berAsges9edito the
��pp r��v�. t r � p 00� wot
• r.lic �stim,�ted coRt o.�' $-- '
caE��ci.ty, Fr�nce Avenue.
pzQpE�rty rwnex' a� 320(�
�ta or ��oward req�cesked that the City Attorney pr�p�re an agre�ment
b
�y�,��,c���e� tiy M�. Du�our a� property owner of 3200 France Avenue.
to
t6
Tt�� C�ity Engin�er stated Cl�e street would tbefore tllerasphalttisrpoured.
it would be �1pprox�.ma��l.y Oc�ober �+, 1979,
Tt�e mot�on pr�ssec� 6-0.
Sa. Securities;
� Resolution 6387
8b. State Aid;
Resolution No. 6388
3c. Misc. Assessments;
Resolution No'. 6389
8d. 1979 Tax Levies;
Resolution No. 6390
Se. Folice Relie� Assn.;
Resolution No. 6391
8f. Fire Relie�' Assn.;
Resolution No. 6392
8g. Bond Sale;
Resolution No. 6377
RLSOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCCS
The Council �dopted Resolution
"'Resolution approvin� securities
from Shelard Nat.ional Bank, St.
Minnesota," by consent.
No. 6387, entitled
for collateral
Louis Park,
Thc Cot�ncil adopted Resoltltiun No. 638�3,
"Resolution reqtieseing maximum allotm�nG
general maintenance of state aid street
by consent. �
The Council adopted Resolution
"Resolution lev}ting assessment
water/sewer charges, nuisance
removal," by consent.
entitled
for
system,"
No. 6389, entitled
for delinquent
abatement and tree
The Council adopted Resolution No. 6390, enti[led
"Resolution approving 1979 tax l�vies, collectible
in 1980," by consent.
The
"A
of
by
Council adopted Resolution No. 6391, entitled
resolution setting minimum tax levy for su�Poct
the St. Louis Park Police RelieF Association."
consent.
The Council adopted Resol�tion No
"A resolution settfn� minimum tax
of the St. LoUis Park Fire Relief
by consent.
6392, entitled
lew for support
Assaciatfon, ��
The Council adopted Resolution No. 6377. enti.tled
"A resolution providing for the issuance and sale
of $4 million� general. obligation impz'ovement b`�nd`
of 1919 and authorizing adveTtisement for b��c,"
by� consent, .
-322-
r
City Council mi.nutes, October 2, 1979
Sh • Re f._--us-='.
Crlec�l.°�- .
Co��
Resolution setting annual service charge for
collection of garbage and refuse and levying
assessment of costs.
It was moved by Councilman Meland, seconded,by
Councilman Elstrom, to re j ect .
�e motion passed 6-0 (Councilman Martin not present; Counc�lman
Hanks present) . � .
Si. ��Iy .
Resolution No. 6393
8'
J•
Resolution relating to LOGIS.
It was moved by Councilman Meland, seconded by
Councilman Hanks, to waive reading and adopt
Resolution No. 6393, entitled "LOGIS resolukion agreeing to
proprietary regulations of O.S.I."
The motion passed 6-0 (Councilman Martin not present).
1980 Budget Firs� reading of ordinance adopting 1980 budget.
Councilman Elstrom,
t October 15, 1979.
�
8k,
It was moved by Councilman Meland, seconded by
to waive first reading and set second reading for
The motiqn passed 6-0 (Councilm�n Martin not prese�t).
Subdivision First reading of ardinance relating to subdivider
prdinance performance bond. ,
It was moved by Councilmano�dinancesandnset by
Councilman Mel�and, Co waive first reading of the .
second reading for October 15, 1979.
The motion passed 6-0 (Councilman Martin not pxesent).
9a. Park and
Recreation
Comm�.ssio�
nr. ni1nTC (1Ti� nFF'L CERS . BOARllS • ANn C01`�11TTF'ES
L�L� 1 v a�+ �+ " -
The minuCes of the Park and Recr�����ni979isWe�e
Commission meeCing h�ld Septembe �
p�dered filed by consent.
9b. Community
Relations Commission
9c.
P].anning
Com i ion
o� rhe Community R�xa���ns Commission
The �+�nu�e� �ember 13, i979, �Jere ordered
meeting held Sep
filed by consent. .
f the Planning CommiSsior► ans held
The minutes o �ti�ee mee�:ing
Ni hwaYs Subco� consent.
Street�s and �9�9 � W�re ordered filed by
September 19,
.. .•, .
. . _ . . . - - :�,.�.::
Yr.�
��
City Council minutes, October 2,
9d . Au�us t
T'inanc ial
Re.--�—`r=
9e. City
It1ciner�tor
Tl�e Augus t , �-9 79 ,
filed by consent.
1979
£inanclal rEport was order�d
Second reading °� deferredefromhAugustg6Sa1979);
City 3.nc�nerator (
report on recycling use.
�t was moved by Counc�lman Meland, seconded by Cou�.cilman Martin, to
waive second reading and adopt the ordinance authorizing sa�le of the
property to Noigaard's.
Councilman Hanks sug�;�5�e� �t would h� aPpropriate to not se11 the
praperty pri.or to a deLermi.nation of Wh�o�eaardesbtolaccommodatebaccess
storage. lle sug��sterl staff. work with �
to irs property.
It was moved by Councilma�l tlanks, seconded by Councilman Backes, to table
the item.
The motion passed 4-3 (Councilmen Martin, Meland and Mayor Howard opposed).
It was moved by Councilman Ra11es, seconded by Cpuncilman Hanks, that the
City rtanager report on th� cost ro use the bui�ding as an incinerator; the
cost benef3t if used as a recyclii�g centert
The City Manager stated a report, as requested, would require 45 to�60
days.
Councilman El�trom explained the Oommunity Relations Commission is
interested in the building's use for recycling and should have an
analysis on the option to coincide with the City Manager's report on
cost estimate. She noted, however, the Commission proposes the building
be used for storage and not for firing. SY�e requested that the report
include the building's potential as a recycling depository.
Councilman Hanks off�red an amen.dment to the motion to include
consideration of granting an easement or lease to �ioigaard's for access.
Councilman Martin offered an amendment to the motion to include a report
on the costs o£ converting the existing building versus constructing a
new bui3.ding.
The moti.on, with amendments, passed 7-p,
The City Manager stated he would report on the results of discussions
with Hoigaard's at the October 15, 1979, meeting, if possible.
9f. 6009 Wayzata Blvd.;
Resolution No. 6394
Request of FBI and Mork Company for special
permit �o conduct automobile xepair at 6009
Wayzata Boulevard.
It was moved by Councilman Ralles, seconded by Councilman Martin, to waive
reading and adopt Resolution No. 6394, entitled "Resolution gzantin$ permit
uncler Section 14-156(18) of tlie Ordinance Code to permit :� m.inor automobile
repair facility in the B-2 District at 6009 Wayzata Boiilevard."
TI�e motion passed 7-0,
-324-
qg. Knollwood
Plaza
City Council minutes, October 2, 1g�9
Request of General Growth Corporation to amend
existing special permit at Knollwood Plaza.
Councilman Martin asked why the proposed exterior materials seem to be
undesirable and not consistent with the quality originally proposed b
the developer. y
Tt�e Planning Director explained normally the exterior plaster is 1/2 to
3/4 inch thick, and in Minnesota weather is not as durable as solid
stone. He said the original proposal was six-inch split base block. He
exhibited a photograph of the proposed slip-off ramp and explained the
applicant has agreed to lessen the angle of the curve.
Phil Engel, representing the applicant, explained plaster is proposed to
detract from the mass of the building and provide flexibility as leases
expire to revise existing areas to the new standard. He continued that
the supplier of the original exterior material cannot guarantee matching
colors, etc., of subsequent orders; this would be possible with the
plaster. Responding to Councilman Meland, he listed clients of the
designer located in Minnesota and North Dakota. He said the applicant
anticipates upgrading the entire center with the proposed exterior
material to revise and tie the store fronts together.
Councilman Meland reported the applicant has filed a tax petition
against the City relating to evaluation of the property.
It was moved by Councilman Meland, seconded by Councilman RaTles, to
table the item until the tax petition is resolved or withdrawn.
The motion failed 3-4 (Councilmen Elstrom, Ralles and Meland in favor).
After further discussion, it was moved by Councilman Hanks, seconded by
Councilman Meland, to defer action until the Planning Commission
reconsiders the.application on Octoher 17, 1979.
The motion passed 5-2 (Councilmen MarCin and Backes opposed).
9h. Reiss Restaurant;
Resolution No. 6395
Request of Reiss Restaurant for special permit
to expand restaurant and parking lot ar 6900
West Lake Street.
It was moved by Councilman Meland, seconded by Councilman Hanks, to
waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 6395, Entitled "A resolution
granting permit under Section 14-183 of the Ordinance Code relaCin� to
zoning to permit the expansion of a Class I Restaurant and liquor store
in the I-3, Industrial District, at 6900 West Lake Street."
The motion passed 7-0.
9i. 6817 Wayzata Blvd.;
Resolution No. 6396
ecial ermit to
Request of William Cooper for sp P
allow warehouse at 6817 Idayzata Boulevard.
It was moved by Councilman Ralles, seconded by Councilman Backes, t° rantin
waive re�zdin 1nd ado t ResoluCion No. 6396, entitled A resolution g g
I���rmlt �inder��ect��an .�14-15h of' L'he Ordin�ricc' (%�c1� �o P�rmtt w�ireliouse use
In Lhc li-2 �eneral �3usin�ss DistricC, at 68.1_7 W��y?1�<� Boulevard."
�
The motion passed 7-a.
-325-
,
,"
.
Gity Council
9j, 7205 Wayzata blvd•;
Resolution No. 6397
minutes, October 2, 1979
Request o� rlichael MacKany
to al.low automotive service
Wayzata Boulevard.
for special permit
center at 7205
riartin noCed that although staff recommends approval of the
Councilman enda has similar conditions with
st�bject request, Item 9k on the ag and staff recommends denial.
respect to Louisiana Avenue/Highway 12,
ro osed upgrading of Nighway 12
The Planning Director referred to the P pe road at Louisiana Avenue.
and the possible�detachment of the frontag
Ne said Louisiana Avenue is recognized as a ms�Which�wouldfattractthigh
City and concern has been expressed about use erties. He
volumes of traffic and turning movements into these prop
continued that traffic from an automotive Saurant candethe�recommenda-
approximately one-tenth of that from a rest �
tion of denial was based upon that criteria.
Councilman Martin agreed access to each of
from the service roads, and this would not
Avenue. He also believed the final plans
affect each property. •
the properties should be
adversely affect Louisiana
for Highway 12 would equally
Followin� discussion, it was moved by Councilman Martin, seconded by
Councilman Ralles, to waive reading and adopt Resolutian No. 6379,
entitled "A resolution granting permit under 5ection 14-156(I8) of the
Ordinance Code.to permit an automotive service center in a B-2 Business
District at 7205 Wayzata Boulevard," amending Condition No. 1 to read:
"...there shall be no access provided along the east sid e of the
property to or from Louisiana Avenue, and the two driveways which
currently exist shall be closed and landscaped with continuous concrete
curb provided along the inside edge in accordance with ordinance
requirements."
The motion passed 6-1 (Councilman Hanks opposed).
9k. 7121 Wayzata Blvd.; Request of George Daniels for. special permit to
Special Fermit Request locate Class IV restaurant (Mr. Donut) at 7121
Wayzata Boulevard.
It was moved by Councilman Hanks to reject.
Councilman Backes referred to staff's five reasons recommending denial and
did not agree that any were justification for rejecting the application.
CounciZman Martin referred to Item 9j on the agenda and
approval of the applications would improve both parcels,
find justification for the staff recommendation.
suggested
and he did not
Responding to ques[ions, George Daniels, applicant, stated he Would agree
with the elimination of the ct�rb cut at Louisfana Avent�e. Ne said A n�'�
buflding would be cons[ructed cantaininR seating for 27 patrons; there
would not be waitress service, and customers would �;� to the c�un[er f°T
donuts and coffee, He added that 85 to 90 percen[ of t.t�e bUQ�nQSG v°"ld
he take-out.
-326-
_ ---p-�1
�
�
City Council minutes, October 2, 1979
.
Counc:�Zman Hanks aske why the staff report did not comment
�,aterials and design, etc : ��e believed that the Council uPon building
routinely presented that information in the � had been
applications f or special permit . Past when reviewing
" Counci]_man
additional
Avenue.
Elstrom expressed concern that the
traff ic f rom an uncontrolled servicerroadatoWLauisganerate
na
It was moved by Counc ilman Hanks, seconded by Councilman Meland, to
table the request until staff provides complete information on the
application.
The motion failed 3-4 �Councilmen Elstrom, Hanks and Meland in favor).
Councilman Hanks withdrew his original motion to reject.
It was moved by Counc�lman Meland to reject.
The motion failed for lack of a second.
It was moved by Councilman Ralles, seconded by Councilman Martin, to
auChorize preparation of an approving resolution for consideration on
October 15, 1979.
� Responding to a question f rom Councilman Martin, the Planning Director
explained when applications are satisfactory with respect to plans and
if the Planning Commission recommends approval, the Council is presented
'� a thorough analysis and an approving resolution for adoption. He said
the application before the Council was basically reviewed with respect
to land use rather than design.
The motion was withdrawn.
It was moved by Councilman Meland ta refer the matter to staff and the
Planning Commission f or further review and recommendation.
The motion �ailed for lack of a second.
Mr. Daniels explained his intent was to huild as soon as possible, and
a delay of another month would postpone any construction until spring of
1980.
It was moved by Councilman Hanks, seconded by
defer the item to October 15, 1979.
The motion passed 7-0.
Addressing th
process for a
He said staff
Councilman Martin, tio
described the
comments of rhe Council, the City Mana�er
special permit request in a p
ositive or negative sense.
desires to comply with the wishes of the Council.
-327-
`
.
�
.
.
10a.
�ncil minutes, October 2, 1979
City Col
Hanlcs said he W�S concerned that
Councilman ted by the Planning Commission
Staff used a policy which
or the Council as a reason
was not adop
for denial.
Commission had
• Director e:�plained if the Pouldihave been presented
The Plann1ng olicy, it w
recommended adop
tion of the P reed to discuss
Council. He said the Eommissio� hsdlong-range plans.
eting to discuss the C Y
the policy
at a me f the
ilman Backes said he had been��intao no�tWanta
Counc llcant, We
staff had informed the app
�+ H tressed that such comments are rotally
to the
further
member o
, Mr. Donut on that
inappropriate.
site. e s
' ed the Council must decide if it wisheT aboardterials,
Mayor Howard bellev
etc.,
following the recommendation of denial �'Staf faandsthe advisory
and those instructions should b e clarifie to
boards.
Appointments
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
AppoinCments to advisory boards and commissions.
It was moved by
Councilman Backes, to reappoint Marilyn
Community Relations Commission.
The motion passed 7-0.
Councilman Elstrom, seconded by
Hoeft to a full term on the
The Council requested that interviews for youth representatives.tosbberds/
commissions be scheduled the evening of October 8, 1979; lnterview
scheduled prior to the Oceober 15 Council meeting for Board of Zoning
Appeals and Aealth Advisory Committee vacancies.
lOb . Water
Problem
Water repair problem at 3409 Texas Avenue.
It was moved by Councilman Meland, se�onded by
Councilman Hanks,to def er the item to Qctober 15,
1979, and requested staff to contact the resident wiCh respect to interest
in a City home repair program.
The motion passed 7-0.
lOc. Folding
Stop Signs
Folding stop signs (deferred from
September 17, 1979) .
Councilman Martin said following receipt of
telephone calls from many citizens, he believed that prior to conductinR
any action, an informational meetin� with the schools and area resid�nts
should be scheduled. Ne also suggested that adult crossing guatds W°�ld
provide better safety than stop signs.
-328-
�-
✓'_
_M-�""^�_
City Council minutes, October 2� 1q79
. ��;.�-i ! �;�r� �aekes Mras oE the opinion
�r�etce� c fan Would be dangerous, and
1�`.��r f���r_��,y stop signs. Ne noted
f��r����y have f our-�ay stops in the
that any drastit cha�ge at ti�
the concerned pe� �e a
�ny schools i� Sp. DPear [o
ie�ediate area. I'Ouis Park
���n� � l�,an Mart in believed other solutions could be f ound �athet than
fcur-V3}• stop s igns .
Iti �ds aav�d by Cou�cilman Maztin to schedule an infom,ational �ti�g,
Th� ��idn failed for lack of a seccrnd,
pat Kernan � 3101 Rhode Island
,� solut ioa f or the saf ety of
no action prior to informing
infornational meeting.
Avenue, offered to work vith the City on
the children and asked the Council to take
the neighborhood or conducting an
It was moved by Councilman Elstrom, seconded by Councilman Ralies, to
renwve the foldi.ng stop signs at West Lake Street/Alabama Avenue and
Hooddale/West 40 Street.
It was moved by Councilman Backes, seconded by Councilman Meland, to
table the item.
The motion to tab le passed 4-2 (Mayor Howard and Councilman Martin
opposed; Councilman Hanks not present) .
- It was moved by Councilman Backes, seconded by Councilman l�eland, to
� direct staff to sched ule a neighborhood meeting, informing representa-
�ives of Holy Family and Most Holy Trinity parishes and the neighbonc�>od.
�
�
Councilman Hanks arrived at 9:40 P•m•
The Ci ty Manager said
meeting, and a report
.1979.
the Public Works Department would scheduie the
would be presented to the Council on November 5,
Mayor Howard stated that Pat Kernan would serve as contact person for the
Holy Family parish.
Rotiert Reinhard, �+713 Vallacher Avenue, offered to serve as contact
person for the Most Holy Trinity parish.
The motion passed 6-0-1 (Councilman Hanks
�iguor License;
Big Ben's
,
abstained).
' Ben's Family Restaurant,
Application of Blg
9950 Wayzata Boulevard f erand onlsale non-
intoxicating wine licens
intoxicating liquor license-
It �as moved by Co�ncilman Hanks,
reject. �
seconded by Councilman Elstrom, to
,
=.�
.
City Coucic�l n�i��ureg,
Octobc�r 2, 1.y�9
tin refer.�rcd to l:h� ��tn�n]. 1'�x£�Prriph of t'he t�C�f.f r�poxt, and
Counci.].man rtax' _ aG���on" w�8 TIV�' F��� �pp�'opr.i�t� c:ri�erl.on fox d�ni�l,
�uggested pro�e� 1
11 , �� ��ie �tnf f mc�m�randum wr�� to
l.� �i ned th�= l�t�r. pc�`�c
The Cir_y M1n��;�r �XP ove�r��-n8 e1.i�i.bi�Lity requiremen�g fc�r. �ranting
repo�t on tr�� ��ty ��ws R �le nc�ted Chat �t the
�e� (wiri�).
oci-salc intox.icating l i.quor ��cen. .
1ic hea�ing he1c� Se���mb�x �-� �nd 47t khe pres�nt t�me, two �Pplicatione
puh p r , � w:Ln� and nonintoxicating.
are presented for a p ava1. �ritoxical'in�,
The motivn passed 6-0 (Councilman B$�kes w�s r�°r Preaent).
10e. Bid
Bid tabul.arion for F1a� Avenue aewer.
Tabulation
- I� was mov�d by Counc:ilman Hankt�, seconded by
Counci lmt�n Ra11es , to rej ee t the hid of.
$13E�,0�t) f'or con5tr.uct:ion of sanitary sewer
ro serve a portion nf the 2000 block of F1ag Avenue.
Tn response to Lyle Aiken, 2QG8 F1a� Avenu�, Counc.ilman Hanks
explained the bid received w�s 50 percent above the C�.ty's estimate.
Councilman Ra11es s�immarized the background of rh� area and said a cost
of $11,000 per lo� would be prohibitive. Ne reported that one res ident
has had his house on the market for 60 days and is experiencing difficulty
selling it because the proper�y lacks sanitary sewer.
Mr. Aiken explained he was assessed for the trunk line in the past and
now is denied access and must continue to use a septic tank.
Councilman Martin believed at some time in the future, the City will
have to provide.sewer to the area.
The motion passed 7-0.
Paul Eddy explained that when purchasing the property, he haci been
informed sewer and water existed.
It was moved by Councilman �ianks, seconded by Councilman Elstrom, to
request a staff review of the situation and a recommendation for pro-
viding sanitary sewer to Mr. Eddy's and the other two properties as
soon as possible.
The motion passed 7-0.
lOf. Bid
Tabulation
Bid tabulation for Westwood Hills Nature CenteT
building.
It was moved by Councilman Meland, seconded bY
Councilman Hanks, to reject the bids.
Councilman Martin was concerned that the project wauld c�sC $R7 per squsre
foot and suggested there must be an explanation,
-330-
� ��
r�`" -
City Council minutes, October 2, 1979
� he m��� i°� Passed 7-0.
Tt was �oved by Councilman Backes, seconded by Councilman Meland, to
�uthori�� staff to meet with the architect to explore all possible
alternatives for redesign in an effort to lower the cost.
The mot.ion passed 4-3
,:-.�, Nae ele
B il Iboard
(Councilmen Martin, Hanks and Mayor �m„�ard opposed) .
Naegele billboard at Vernon AvenueJHighvay 12
(requested by Councilman Meland).
It was moved by Councilman Meland, seconded by
Councilman Hanks, to remove the item from the
table.
The motion passed 6-1 (Counc ilman Backes opposed},
It was moved by Councilman Meland, seconded by Councilman Hanks, to
authorize staff to discuss the s ituation with the Naegele Company and
report to the Council on November 5, 1979.
The motion passed 6-1 (Councilman Backes opposed).
Councilman Elstrom requested that the businessmen in the ar�a be
notified of the meeting.
�ia. NSP Agreement;
Resolution No. 6398
Louis Park and Northern
adopted by consent.
llb. Highway 12 Railroad;
Resoiution No. 6399
NEW BUSINESS
Agreement with NSP for street light maintenance.
Resolution No. 6398, entitled "Resolution
authorizing agreement between the City of St.
States Power Company for street lighting," was
Proposed signal
Highway 12.
for railroad crossing at
Resolution No. 6399, entitled "Resolution
requesting the Minnesota Department of Transportation to se� 5tem atcthe
hearing relative to the maintenance of the proPOSed signal sy ��
railroad crossing at Highway 12 between Zarthan and Colorado Avenues,
was adopted by consent .
Change Order/
Bus Plaza �
Contract No.
$450,fi66.Q9.
Change
Cedar
order - bus
Lake Road.
roved Change Order No.
gy consent, the Council aPP
1339, amounting to $13,50
p f or a total contract to date of
plaza at Vernon Avenue/
2,
•��V
t �l�; A ~ �
• 1�. � ,,•.�
....,._ _
City Council minutes,
lld. Chan e Order/
Lenox
Change
October 2, 197g
order - Lenox Community Center.
It was moved by Councilman
Councilman Elstrom, to approve the change order in
dditional exits, and to deduct the same amount
f or a
The City Manager explained
claim.
The motion passed 7-0.
lle, Change Order/
Project 79-11
No. 3, extending
December 1, 1979.
llf. Liquor License
Transf er
lZa. Damage
Claims
Meland, seconded�by
the amount of $13,341
from the design fee.
the City Attorney is preparing a notice of
Change Order
request for
- Collins Electric Company
time extension.
By consent, the Council approved Change
the final completion date on Contract No. 1335
Order
to
By consent, the Council set public hearing for
November 5, 197�9, on application for on-sale,
Sunday-sale intoxicating liquorlicense at
5600 Wayzata Boulevard; Sweet Caroline's of
Minnesota, Inc.
MISCELLANEOUS
Damage claims
1) Donald Drennan, 9904 2nd Avenue South;
2) Howard J. Schlaifer, 2627 Florida Avenue.
The Council ordered the claims filed with the City Clerk for proper
action by the City Manager and City Attorney by consent.
12b. Communications
from Mayor
12c. Communications
from Cit Manager
CLAIMS
13a. Verified
Clai.ms
---�r_
None.
1. Regional meeting of League of Minnesota
Cities - The Council was requested to contact
the City rlanager's Of f ice by Oc tober 15, and
staff would make reservations for those
interested in attending.
APPROPRIATIONS AND_ CONTFtACT PAYt�FNTc
On motion of Councilman Hanks, seconded by
Councilman Meland, the list of verified claims
prepared by the Director of Finance and directed
to the City Council, dated October Z, 1979, in
the total amountg of $368�p40.44 for vendors anc� $11 13�3.-�0 foX
were approved, and the C � p�}�toll
i�y rtana�er, Ci ty f'1 crk and C i ty Treaq►�rer �k're
authorized to issue ck�ecks in the same arnounts b a vote o.f 7-0.
Y
�332--
i�b �entrarl
Ya ents
Gity Council minutes, October 2, 1979
T r w��� m�v�ci hy C�un�i iman Meland
('��unc i lman Backe� + geconded by
f �1 lowin '�� '�rPrnve and authorize the
g partial ��ntr.�ct payments:
1) Partial payment, Projects 79-01 79-03 79-08, 79-43,
paving, sidewalk and misc, utilities, Hardrives, Inc.
Amount: $106,458.84.
2) Partia 1 payment, Projects 79-13, 78-44, 78-46, paving,
curb and gutter, Hardrives, Inc. Amount: $95,785,65.
3) Partial payment, Projects 77-11A, 77-11B & 74-22,
paving, curb and gutter, Hardrives, Inc. Amount: $49,h6�.07.
4) Partial payment, Project 78-20, City Hall gara�e,
Sun Mechanical and Elec,trical Co. Amount: $17,063.70.
5) Partial payment, Project 78-20, City Hall Garage,
George F. Cook Construction Co. Amount: $51,932.90.
6) Partial payment, Projects 74-39, 77-38B, 79-04, 79-07,
79-35, 79-35A, 79-53 and 78-S2A, paving, curb, gutter, alley
p��vinQ .�ncl parking lots, Arcon Construction Company.
Am��unt : $R0, 616. $6.
7) Partial payment, Projects 77-11C, 78-48, 78-49 and
78-44A, street lighting, Collins Electric ComPany.
Amount: $40,500.
8) Partial payment, ProjecL- 78-20, City Hall garage,
West Electric Company. Amount: $1,967.40.
9) Partial payment, Project �79-49, landscaping, Natural
Green, Inc. �m�unt: $8,538.30.
The motion passed 7-0.
14 . Ad j ournment
Attest:
����_
Beverly rlanagan
Recording Secretary
Un motion of Co�incilman
Councilman Mark ln, tlie
at 11:45 p.m. by a vote
!lanks,
m�eting
of 7-Q.
Mayor
-33`�-
s�canded by
was adjourned