HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979/04/24 - ADMIN - Minutes - City Council - Joint1.
2.
MINUTES
JOINT CITY COUNCIL/HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
April 24, 1979
Call to Order
Roll Call
AUTHORITY
The meeting was called to order by Chairman
Glotter at 7:05 p.m.
The following Councilmen were present at
roll call:
Martha Elstrom
John Ralles
Ronald Backes
Jerrold Martin
The following Housing Authority Commissioners
were present at roll call:
Dudley Moylan Thomas Williams
Joel Glotter
Commissioner Heltzer arrived at 7:30 p.m.; Councilman Hanks arrived at
8:30 p.m. Also present were the City Manager and Executive Director.
3. Development Proposals Chairman Glotter explained the Council and
Authority, at their meeing of March 27,
1979, reviewed the initial development proposals of the Darrel Farr Develop-
ment Corporation, Diversified Equities Corporation and Chem-Care, Inc., for
a 3-acre parcel located on Park Center Boulevard. He continued staff has
completed its f inal review of the proposals including analysis of site
planning, development impacts to property in the immediate area, public
costs. associated with the development and refinement of the tax increment
revenues or other relevant financial factors.
Referring to the original analysis of the three development ptoposals and
the supplemental� report submitted to the Council and Authority, the
Executive Director presented the final analysis of each proposal.
Regarding the proposal of�Diversified Equities Corporation, Joe1 Glotter
questioned how such a development would relate to the City's Housing
Assistance Plan. In response, the Executive Director explained the Housing
Assistance Plan provides for approximately 150 units for the elderly. A
proposal previously submitted for funding, east of City Hall, would meet
the needs of the City for approximately three years.
Regarding the proposal of Chem-Care, Inc., the Executive Director explained
the original design provided for extension of the existing building to the
north with a one-story link to a seven-story office building. He added
that a new design had b'een submitted on this date which expanded the
original design from 62,000 square feet to 91,000 square feet; such expansion
would produce a greater tax i,ncrement. He added, however, there is potential
for tax abatement as a result of the proposed occupancy.
-115-
-f �
fl__�;= -
:
City Council/Authority Minutes
April 24, 1979
resenting Chem-Care, distributed a summary of the new
Harry Garrish, reP ro osin this Iocation as
ro osal. He exp.lained Chem-Care is p p g
design p P requ�ring an additivnal 30,000 square feet for
its natio�al off ice,
office space and 10,000 square feet for medical c�re. The propose
structure would be eleven stories with a two-story parking ramp. He
further explained the development would billionlwith anoverallatax�
Phase 1 costing $650,000; Phase 2, $5.2 m
increment of $250,000.
In res�onse to a question from Joe1 G1ott�TialarevenuerbondsXand�may need
the developer. would seek tax exempt indus
assistance from the City to relocate theedtf or relocationeofrthe�storm
cation of the site plan may eliminate n
sewer.
In response to a question from Councilman Backes, Harry Garrish described
examples of the developer's experience in construction.
In response to a question from Jim Heltzer, Harry Garrish explained the
�, expanded facility would have no direct relationship with the St. Louis
Park Medical Center; however, there may be some benefit to assembling
medical-related buildings in a general proximity.
_ __ $►
---_ �
���
In a response to a question from Joel Glotter, Harry Garrish exp],ained
the interim between Phase 1 and Phase 2 construction would be approximately
one to two years.
Regarding the proposal of the Darrel Farr Aevelopment Corporation, Tom
Williams questioned the proposed developmen� schedule. Darrel Farr
explained he has commissioned an architect who has prepared plans for
the site and could t�e under constructio�n within 60 days of f inal approval
and permits.
In response to a question from Councilman Baekes, Darrel Farr stated the
project is predicated on Council approval of industrial revenue bonds
for this purpose.
Philip Eder, representing the Excels�or Boulevard Advisory Committee,
explained the Committee voted unanimously to support the proposal of
the Darrel Farr Development Corporation. He explained that while the
Chem-Care proposal had merit, it was felt that residential use would be
more beneficial than commercial or off ice; howevex, the Cotmnittee would
not be adverse to the City further studying the Chem-Care proposal.
In response to Councilman Martin, the Executive Director explained each
developer proposes to negotiate and purchase the nec�ssary land without
City involvement.
Following discussion regarding a suggestion to study the revised proposal
of Chem-Care Inc., it was moved by Commissioner Heltzer, seconded by
Councilman Ralles, to table action on the three development proposals.
The motion failed.
- 116-
�.
�
�
f
6
�a
� , _ -a
�.,. .
City Caunc il/Auttlority Minutes
April 24, 1979
It was moved by Council.man Elstrom to eliminate the proposal of Diversified
Equities Incorporated and table the remaining two proposals. There was
no second to the motion. It was moved by Commissioner Heltzer, seconded
by Commissioner Moylan, to authorize preparation of a letter of intent to
the Darrel A. Farr Development Corporation for a 126-unit condominium
apartment.
In response to Councilman Backes and Conmlissioner Heltzer, the Executive
Director explained that a letter of intent could be drafted and returned
to the Council and Authority at their next regular meeting.
There was discussion regarding the proposed use of tax exempt mortgage
revenue bonds and whether this procedure would be allowed. It was agreed
this question would likely be resolved by action of the Minnesota Legislature.
Commissioner Heltzer stated that while he would prefer to wait 30 days to explore
the revised proposal of Chem-Care Incorporated, he believes both �roposals
appeared to hade merit and would support the desire of the Authority, Council
and Excelsior Boulevard Task Force.
The motion passed 8-0-1 (Councilman Hanks abstained).
4. Marketing Plan
City water tower.
Description of marketing plans and activity
for site on Excelsior Boulevard near the
On questions from Chairman Glotter, the Authority's Renewal Development
Director reviewed a report describing the marketing plan for a hotel at
this location. He explained potential developers have been contacted with-
out success. The Executive Director presented a financial projection for
three alternative development plans of variable intensity.
There was considerable discussion regarding the need for a market study
pertaining to a hotel and whether development of a motor hotel would
be the best use €or this site.
Commissioner Heltzer stated that if after some attempt to market this
property it becomes ap�arent that a motel is not successful, an alternative
should be available. • �
Councilman Hanks expressed concern regarding intensifying the development
�in density, without'addressing the traff ic problems at this location.
Councilman Elstrom suggested consideration be given to other sites within
the district for this use, thereby allowing a potential for smaller de�velop-
ments which could be supported by the.existing market.
5. Water Committee
The Executive Director
status of�the proposed
prablems and issues at
currently being sought.
The status
Committee.
report on proposed Water Quality
a�lvised the Council and Authority of the current
development of a Water QulainedCthattmembersSarey
Oak Park Village. He exp
-117-
� CiCy Coun�il/Autl�ority
April 24, 1979
Minutes
6. A_d^�znment of
Jnint Mee�in
no further discussion, the '
There being , Joint
meeting o�f the City Council and Housing Rede��elo
me�� Authority was adjourned at 9:20 p,m,
.
Tabulation of bids for public safety radio
7, Tabuiation o� B�ds transmission-
seconded by Councilman Ralles, to
It was moved by Councilman Elstrom, ora�ed as the lowest responsible
' nate General CommunicaCions Incorp .
deslg e of $5,764 for dismantlement of the existing radio
bidder at the rata�ion of a temporary transmitting tower and the pertinent
tower and �-nSHall•
work at City
The motion passed 5-0.
g, Adjournment
The motion passed 5-0.
Mark `sather
Recording
Secretary
It was moved by Councilman Elstrom, secundpd
by Councilman Backes , to adj ourn the City
Council meeting at 7:22 P•m•
]
Mayor
-i�.s-
,