Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1974/09/10 - ADMIN - Minutes - City Council - Regular CcActl Minutes , September 10 , 19714 orise tot a questirn from Councilman Thiel , Mayor Fleetham stated that although 1 � rr. sp g persons will undoubtedly be interested in preserving the marsh area scuta, of Cedar Lake Read , equal concern must: be shown for the residential neighbcrt.ccds which & � e belrg disrupted beca. 0se of noise and other problems associated with t-, gh CrQfiI ,101A. Mes on. Ce. dat Dake Road , rczponse r. c, concerns expressed by Councilman Thiel , the Director of Public Works afed that the County scheduled the Qfimprovement of this area for- 1977 . It was moved by Councilman Thiel , seconded by Councilman Graves , to halve staff adti. , i' s H.err1epL ► Cou.nty that• St . Loui. s Park cannot accept Alternative 2 . and recommend re � ey;aminat ion and fu. rtffer discussion of Alternatives 1 and 3 . The motion. passed 7 - 0 . Ccunci. lman Hanks reminded the Council that it should not rule out an a. d. di #- ional dlrernatiP�' e , a " do nothing" approach . Councilman Griak inquired as to wh► en neighbor"he' od meetings should be held to discuss these proposed modifications to Cedar Lake Road . Councilman Draskin suggested that neighborhood meetings wait ,;rail Hen.n.epin County , the City Ceuncil and the Planning Commission can .further study and make recommendations on the proposed alternatives . Alleged L. i.gj. or�nse Violations e The City Attorney briefly reviewed the information prepared by him regarding the alleged liquor violations of Banny ' s Inc , and Mll acle Mile Liquors and informed the Council that copies of this same Cz report ha�; e been gigPen to Mr . Herb Davis , a tllrasy tootheeAttogneyeGeneral ' snOrf ice . ro Mr . Ed Cohen , attorney for Bunny ' s , as we Neither of the attorneys has voiced any disagreement with the information contained in the report . The City Attorney stated that the Council must review the facts as presented , in light applicable liquor license ordinances of the existing mtil. tiple ownership laws and ro elate . He noted that the City cand statutes , and take the action they deem app P Council has variorzs options which can be taken in regard tothellinses ; revoking cond�uc ting a hearing to review issuing tags o �r• c. ompl. aints ; taking no action at all . one or bath c: f rhe liquor licenses of the violators ; He r e intoxicating liquor statutes treat violatinforns cefthzela.wy and e noted that th t. ontai.n ,s sanctions against public of Eicials for failure to e even though action. may Coanci. lman Graves nothat if the Councelbaamed forid ngailure to enforce existie�_g not be required , rheCity Cou.nc it could b la.w ; , Cou.nci. lman. Druskin , the City Attorney noted that In response to an. i. n. quiry from licated statutory matter' s to office on comp ent op he consults the Attorney General s in :i ons . see . d held discuss ns in. order to avoid divergent Geek hi c p �.r?. �. c�n an ) t - ed City Manager no _ ed that the ln, answer to a go, est: ion. from. Cou.nc :� lmon Hanks ) Harold Aretz as the owner of Bunny ' s In , 1 i liquor 1 iCense aPP l Ica t i 12 of Counc ilman Hanks noted that themainvip uflsharesiin 90 shares since 1972 • did not a3mit his own tFia 1ica.n. t , Mr , Are in violation of the fast that t�h.e apP uor establishments are Bonny ' ; Inc . ; however , both 1 i q 'nultiple ownership statute 215