HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008/10/20 - ADMIN - Agenda Packets - City Council - RegularAGENDA
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7:30 P.M.
OCTOBER 20, 2008
1. Call to Order
1a. Pledge of Allegiance
1b. Roll Call
2. Presentations – None
3. Approval of Minutes
3a City Council Minutes September 15, 2008
3b. City Council Special Study Session Minutes October 6, 2008
3c. City Council Minutes October 6, 2008
4. Approval of Agenda and Items on Consent Calendar
NOTE: The Consent Calendar lists those items of business which are considered to be routine and/or which need no
discussion. Consent items are acted upon by one motion. If discussion is desired by either a Councilmember or a
member of the audience, that item may be moved to an appropriate section of the regular agenda for discussion. The
items for the Consent Calendar are listed on the last page of the Agenda.
Recommended Action:
Motion to approve the agenda as presented and to approve items on the consent calendar.
(Alternatively: Motion to add or remove items from the agenda, motion to move items from consent
calendar to regular agenda for discussion and to approve those items remaining on the consent
calendar.)
5. Boards and Commissions -- None
6. Public Hearings
6a. Ordinance for Vacation of a Portion of a Drainage and Utility Easement at 4210 28th
Street West
Recommended Action:
Mayor to close public hearing. Motion to Approve First Reading of Ordinance
approving the vacation of a portion of a drainage and utility easement at 4210 28th
Street West, contingent upon the applicant providing a replacement easement, and
setting the second reading of the proposed ordinance for November 3rd, 2008
6b. Public Hearing for Assessment of Delinquent Utilities, Tree Removal/Injection,
False Alarms and Other Miscellaneous Charges
Recommended Action:
Mayor to close the public hearing. Motion to Adopt Resolution Assessing
Delinquent Water, Sewer, Storm Sewer, Refuse and Other Fees and Charges
Meeting of October 20, 2008
City Council Agenda
6c. 2009 Budget and Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 1.
Recommended Action:
Close Public Hearing. Motion to Approve Resolution setting the 2009 Budget and
Property Owner Service Charge for Special Service District No. 1 and directing staff
to certify the annual service charges to Hennepin County
6d. 2009 Budget and Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 2
and the extension of the Special Service District No. 2 through 2018
Recommended Action:
Close Public Hearing. Motion to Approve Resolution setting the 2009 Budget and
Property Owner Service Charge for Special Service District No. 2 and directing staff
to certify the annual service charges to Hennepin County
6e. 2009 Budget and Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 3
Recommended Action:
Close Public Hearing. Motion to approve resolution setting the 2009 Budget and
Property Owner Service Charge for Special Service District No. 3 and directing staff
to certify the annual service charges to Hennepin County
6f. 2009 Budget and Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 4
Recommended Action:
Close Public Hearing. Motion to approve resolution setting the 2009 Budget and
Property Owner Service Charge for Special Service District No. 4 and directing staff
to certify the annual service charges to Hennepin County.
7. Requests, Petitions, and Communications from the Public
8. Resolutions, Ordinances, Motions and Discussion Items
8a. Ordinance Amending Sections of Chapter 6 – Building and Regulations and
Chapter 8 Business and Contractor Licensing
Recommended Action:
Motion to Adopt First Reading of Ordinance amending Section 6-179 and several
sections in Chapter 8 relating to Business and Contractor Licensing and set second
reading for November 3, 2008
8b. St. Louis Park Emergency Program (STEP) Conditional Use Permit
Recommended Action:
Motion to Adopt Resolution approving a Conditional Use Permit for excavation of
over 400 cubic yards of aggregate material at 2544 State Highway 100
Meeting of October 20, 2008
City Council Agenda
8c. Call for Sale of General Obligation Revenue Bonds
Recommended Action:
Motion to Adopt Resolution Providing for Sale of:
• $4,075,000 G.O. Utility Revenue Bonds (MSC), Series 2008A and
• $5,625,000 G.O. Tax Increment Revenue Bonds, Series 2008B (Park Place
Blvd)
9. Communication
Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. To make arrangements, please call the
Administration Department at (952) 924-2525 (TDD (952) 924-2518) at least 96 hours in advance of meeting.
St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority and regular City Council meetings are carried live on Civic TV cable
channel 17 and replays are frequent; check www.parktv.org for the schedule. The meetings are also streamed live on the
internet at www.parktv.org, and saved for Video on Demand replays. The agenda is posted on Fridays on the official
city bulletin board in the lobby of City Hall and on the text display on Civic TV cable channel 17. The agenda and full
packet are available by noon on Friday on the city’s website.
Meeting of October 20, 2008
City Council Agenda
4. CONSENT CALENDAR
4a. Adopt Resolution Suspending Collection of Local Gambling Tax for 2009
4b. Approve Temporary On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for B’nai Emet Women’s League
4c. Approve and Authorize Purchase Agreement for 5724 Goodrich Avenue
4d. Approve and Authorize Purchase Agreement for 3764 Wooddale Avenue
4e. Approve Proclamation for Minnesota Manufacturer’s Week
4f. Adopt Resolution Special Assessment Sewer Service Line Repair 3225 Hampshire Ave S
4g. Approve for Filing Vendor Claims
4h. Approve for Filing Housing Authority Minutes September 10, 2008
4i. Approve for Filing Planning Commission Minutes September 17, 2008
Meeting Date: October 20, 2008
Agenda Item #: 3a
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
SEPTEMBER 15, 2008
1. Call to Order
Mayor Pro Tem Sanger called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
Councilmembers present: Mayor Pro Tem Susan Sanger, John Basill, Phil Finkelstein, Paul Omodt
and Loran Paprocki.
Councilmembers absent: Mayor Jacobs and C. Paul Carver.
Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), City Attorney (Mr. Scott), Police Chief (Mr. Luse),
Fire Chief (Mr. Stemmer), Environmental Coordinator (Mr. Vaughan), Recreation Superintendent
(Mr. Birno), Community Development Director (Mr. Locke), Planning & Zoning Supervisor (Ms.
McMonigal), Assistant Zoning Administrator (Mr. Morrison), Senior Planner (Mr. Walther) and
Recording Secretary (Ms. Schmidt).
Other present: Ms. Tilsner, (Minnesota Recreation and Park Association), Mr. Bakken (Local 993
Union President), Mr. Gregory (Greco Real Estate Development), Mr. Bader, Mr. Davolis, Mr.
Farber and Ms. Merrigan (Bader Development), Mr. Buckeye (Mn/DOT) and Residents Mr.
Skinner, Mr. Miller, Mr. Walbran, Ms. Baker, Mr. White, Mr. Carlisle, Ms. White, Ms. Rose, Ms.
Anderson and Mr. Anderson.
2. Presentations
2a. Minnesota Recreation and Park Association - Recycling in the Parks Program
Award
Ms. Tilsner, Minnesota Recreation and Park Association Member presented an
Award of Excellence to the City Council and Park and Recreation Department for
the Recycling in the Park Program. She further stated in 2007, the community
recycled 3.4 tons of material in the parks, which had outstandingly doubled the 2006
amount.
2b. 2008 Evergreen Awards
Mr. Vaughan presented Jodi Johnston, 3156 Idaho Avenue South and Barbara
Bindgen and Tom Johnson, 4107 W 40th Lane with the 2008 Evergreen Awards.
He explained that the Evergreen Awards are awarded in recognition of properties
that are uniquely designed, landscaped and well maintained with an emphasis on
landscaping.
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 3a) Page 2
Subject: City Council Minutes September 15, 2008
2c. Minnesota Recreation and Park Association Rink Rat Hockey Program Award
Ms. Tilsner presented an Excellence in Programming Award from MRPA for the
Rink Rat Hockey Program, which establishes the opportunity for youth to play
outdoor recreational hockey in a minimally structured environment.
2d. Retirement Recognition for Lieutenant Dale Antonson
Mayor Pro Tem Sanger read a Resolution and presented Fire Lt. Dale Antonson with
a plaque of appreciation for his 21 years of dedicated service to the City of St. Louis
Park and its community.
Mr. Eric Bakken presented Mr. Antonson his badge plaque for his leadership in the
Local 993 union for over 20 years.
3. Approval of Minutes
3a City Council Closed Executive Session Minutes September 2, 2008
The minutes were approved as presented.
3b. City Council Minutes September 2, 2008
It was noted on page three, item #8a, the first paragraph, should be located prior to the
motion on page two.
3c. City Council Special Study Session Minutes September 2, 2008
It was noted on page one, Councilmember C. Paul Carver was absent.
It was noted on page two, item #2, the fourth paragraph should state: “… it was a great
vision and should consider multiple locations, including possibly partnering with the school
district on property they own on and around the current high school sports field.”
4. Approval of Agenda and Items on Consent Calendar
NOTE: The Consent Calendar lists those items of business which are considered to be routine
and/or which need no discussion. Consent items are acted upon by one motion. If discussion is
desired by either a Councilmember or a member of the audience, that item may be moved to an
appropriate section of the regular agenda for discussion.
4a. Adopt Resolution No. 08-011 to recognize Dale Antonson’s retirement after 21
years of service to the City of St. Louis Park.
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 3a) Page 3
Subject: City Council Minutes September 15, 2008
4b. Adopt Resolution No. 08-112, requesting the Metropolitan Council to provide
additional time to complete the Comprehensive Plan Decennial Review.
4c. Authorize staff to issue a Request for Bid to replace the existing City building
telephone system.
4d. Approve Contract with Three Rivers Park District to clear and remove snow from
the LRT and Cedar Lake Extension Trails through the City of St. Louis Park for
2008-2009 winter season.
4e. Designate G.L. Contracting Inc. as the lowest responsible bidder of the earthwork
portion and authorize execution of a contract with the firm in the amount of
$131,090.04 and designate DMJ Corporation as the lowest responsible bidder of the
paving aspect and authorize execution of a contract with the firm in the amount of
$251,307.44 for the Fern Hill Park project.
4f. Designate G.L. Contracting Inc. as the lowest responsible bidder for the construction
of Tennis Courts at Bass Lake, and authorize execution of a contract with the firm in
the amount of $128,223.30.
4g. Approve Change Order No. 1 to Contract 80-08 - Water Project – Recoat Elevated
Water Tower No. 4 - Project 2007-1500.
4h. Adopt Resolution No. 08-113, authorizing a Hennepin County Grant Agreement
to fund the City’s curbside recycling program.
4i. Adopt Resolution No. 08-114 establishing a special assessment for the repair of the
water and sewer service line at 3217 Florida Avenue South.
4j. Adopt Resolution No. 08-115 accepting Donation from American Legion Post 282
in the amount of $500 for use at Westwood Nature Center.
4k. Adopt Resolution No. 08-116, establishing a special assessment for the installation
of a fire suppression sprinkler system at 4838-4850 35th Street, St. Louis Park, MN.
4l. Adopt Resolution No.08-117, approving designation of nonconservation land
shown on Classification List “1442 C/NC” by Board of County Commissioners of
Hennepin County for the property at 3308 Xenwood.
4m. Adopt Resolution No. 08-118, accepting Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources Federal Recreational Trail Grant.
4n. Approve for Filing Vendor Claims.
4o. Approve for Filing Human Rights Commission Minutes April 15, 2008.
4p. Approve for Filing Human Rights Commission Minutes May 20, 2008.
4q. Approve for Filing Police Advisory Commission Minutes September 3, 2008.
4r. Approve for Filing Planning Commission Minutes August 6, 2008.
4s. Approve for Filing Housing Authority Minutes July 16, 2008.
It was moved by Councilmember Paprocki, seconded by Councilmember Finkelstein, to
approve the Agenda and items listed on the Consent Calendar.
The motion passed 5-0.
5. Boards and Commissions - None
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 3a) Page 4
Subject: City Council Minutes September 15, 2008
6. Public Hearings - None
7. Requests, Petitions, and Communications from the Public – None
8. Resolutions, Ordinances, Motions and Discussion Items
8a. First Reading of Ordinance Amendments Relating to Dogs
Police Chief Luse presented the staff report.
Councilmember Basill stated he appreciated all the work done by police staff on this
ordinance, further stating it’s important to keep up with the state law and a good ordinance
to have in place.
Councilmember Finkelstein noted that Council has had at least three separate study sessions
regarding the amendments and felt they have considered their decision very carefully. He
further stated they had considered off-leash dogs, but decided against it since it could lead to
confusion.
Mayor Pro Tem Sanger clarified that the off-leash remarks do not apply to the dog parks.
It was moved by Councilmember Basill, seconded by Councilmember Omodt, to adopt First
Reading of Ordinance amending Sections 4-81 through 4-89 concerning dogs and set
second reading for October 6, 2008.
The motion passed 5-0.
8b. Final Plat with Easement Variances and Final Planned Unit Development for
Wooddale Pointe.
Resolution Nos. 08-119 and 08-120
Mr. Morrison presented the staff report.
Councilmember Basill asked if they had the authority to include the public art as part of
final PUD. Mr. Morrison stated the outlot would be owned by the City and the public art
would be included on the public land.
Councilmember Basill wanted to commend staff and the developer for the increase of
building to street allowance, allowing more walkability. He further stated concern with the
public parking and the proposed light rail at 36th and Wooddale proposed for 2016. He
suggested that if it should become a problem, staff look at possibly putting time limits to
assist the retail customers. He also asked if the top of the building would be screened from
the Elmwood neighborhood. Mr. Morrison stated it would be screened from all sides.
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 3a) Page 5
Subject: City Council Minutes September 15, 2008
Councilmember Finkelstein stated he hoped the commercial space would not be in name
only and that other amenities would be open to public for mixed use.
Mr. Gregory, Greco Real Estate Development, stated they have every intention of honoring
the requests of Council and stated they agree with having parking restrictions.
Councilmember Basill clarified that parking restrictions would benefit their development as
well as the neighboring commercial properties.
It was moved by Councilmember Basill, seconded by Councilmember Finkelstein, to adopt
Resolution Nos. 08-119 and 08-120 approving a Final Plat with easement variances and
Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) approval for a five story mixed use building with
commercial uses on the ground floor and senior residential on the upper floors with
conditions as recommended by the Planning Commission and Staff.
The motion passed 5-0.
8c. Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment – Al’s Bar Redevelopment 3408, 3412
France Avenue; 3409, 3413, 3417 Glenhurst Avenue Case No.: 08-27-CP.
Resolution No. 08-121
Mr. Walther presented the staff report.
Mr. Bader, Bader Development, gave a brief background of his company.
Dean Dovolis gave an overview of the project.
Damon Farber gave an overview on the landscaping, plaza components and streetscape.
Pat Skinner, 3336 Huntington Avenue South, stated that as a member of the group that put
together the development design guidelines, this project is the closest to meeting those
guidelines. He also felt that issues such as parking, buffer and height should still be
consulted with the neighborhood. Mr. Skinner stated the Comprehensive Plan shouldn’t be
changed to accommodate one project. He suggested the City consider a way to change the
Comprehensive Plan, after the fact, as an administrative manner based on approval of the
project by City Council. He further requested that Council put in clear definable terms
some type of reversion clause to reset it, if the project changes or doesn’t happen.
Mayor Pro Tem Sanger asked Mr. Scott if there is a mechanism to amend documents for a
means of a reversion status if the currently proposed project doesn’t go forward within a
reasonable amount of time.
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 3a) Page 6
Subject: City Council Minutes September 15, 2008
Mr. Scott explained the current ordinance provision requires they act on the Comprehensive
Plan amendment before accepting an application for the PUD and rezoning. He further
stated that if Council approved the Comprehensive Plan, they could also consider a motion
to direct certain benchmarks for re-guiding back to the current zoning.
Mayor Pro Tem Sanger asked how that would be done and if staff would have to draft a
motion for the next meeting. Mr. Scott stated staff had language available for Council’s
consideration.
Councilmember Basill stated he understood the neighborhood concerns and felt there
needed to be an additional motion for added protection. He gave a brief history of requests
for this property and the neighborhood involvement in creating the design guidelines.
Councilmember Basill stated that they would be taking a leap of faith whenever the
Comprehensive Plan is changed and felt that the future controls were not enough if the
proposal did not go through and has consulted with staff for language on re-guidance in such
cases.
John Miller, 3550 France Avenue South, stated he has been a resident of St. Louis Park for
over 40 years and stated concern that the guidelines would not be followed if the
Comprehensive Plan was changed. He referenced Minnesota case law and explained that the
only way you can change a Comprehensive Plan is: 1) explain why the original plan was in
error; or 2) show a change in circumstances which make it absolutely imperative and
necessary to change the plan to make use of the property. Mr. Miller explained that the
established design guidelines would be abandoned if the Comprehensive Plan was changed.
Joseph Walbran, 3806 Glenhurst Avenue, felt the developers made a honest effort to follow
their design guidelines and appreciated their efforts. He suggested that the developer agree
to a conditional grant. He further stated his concern with the height and felt it should only
be four stories tall, with room in the center of massing up to five stories. Mr. Walbran was
concerned if they developer acquired the motel, it too would be five stories, creating a wall
down Excelsior Boulevard. He concluded by adding that his wife felt the traffic problems
could be reduced by the usage of traffic circles.
Betsy Baker, 3905 Kipling Avenue, stated she had been involved in the developments for the
Al’s Bar site for 12 years, stating she shared the same concerns of Mr. Skinner and Mr.
Walgran. She too, would like to see it kept under four stories.
Douglas White, 4118 Randall, stated the development guidelines request that the hotel be
included in the development of the property, which would allow more access to the
buildings. Mr. Walther stated the development guidelines are used as a tool for evaluating
development proposals that come in and the guideline anticipated phased development.
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 3a) Page 7
Subject: City Council Minutes September 15, 2008
Mr. White felt they have been part of a “zoning creep” through the years with
Comprehensive Plan changes and zoning changes along the way, with no “step-up” in
between. He also stated concern as to why the motel property was not included by the
developer. Mr. White also questioned the number of proposed units. He further asked why
they have development guidelines if the City is not following them.
Councilmember Basill stated that the current zoning is used as a reference to illustrate the
number of units under the current zoning units of 132 and the proposed units of 133.
Councilmember Basill stated the developer is aware of the concerns with the buffer yard and
is willing to work with the neighborhood to create a good buffer yard.
Mr. Locke clarified that the discussion was on the Comprehensive Plan and not rezoning.
He explained that the Comprehensive Plan discusses broad uses, broad categories and basic
intensity of development.
Mr. White stated the reason for going through the Comprehensive Plan was so that they
could go through the rezoning.
Mr. Locke explained the rezoning would be a discussion for another night.
Mr. White stated he felt the development guidelines called for respecting the current
Comprehensive Plan and zoning and hoped that Council would take that into account. He
also felt the increased value may be at the detriment of the people living next door.
Chris Carlisle, 3321 Huntington Avenue, felt the optics were bad and that there was
delineation between the Comprehensive Plan and zoning. He stated it seemed to be
fundamentally changing the character of the economic value of those properties and felt that
it procedurally was getting rammed through. Mr. Carlisle felt a conditional approval made
sense and may give the neighborhood some comfort. He also felt the motel site should be
developed at same time.
Elizabeth White, 4118 Randall, felt the way the property currently exists is a real buffer with
green grass, which would keep single family houses apart from a development. Ms. White
stated concern with the rezoning in 1999 from R1 to R4, with no development happening
and nothing being reversed. She also suggested TIF money not be used for providing green
roofs, but for something of value to the neighborhood.
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 3a) Page 8
Subject: City Council Minutes September 15, 2008
Nancy Rose, 3402 Huntington Avenue, stated her concern with the commercial mixed-use
designation of the Comprehensive Plan. She stated the goal of creating a livable community
would not be met, since the needed population density would be lacking. She further stated
that pedestrians would be insignificant to the businesses and parking requirements
established by the City would reveal an expectation that wouldn’t be many pedestrians. She
felt the proposal may damage the livability of the neighborhood by causing a mini shopping
plaza sandwiched between two residential areas and forcing commercial parking right up to a
residential area. She asked that the proposal be rejected and consider a land-use review for
the property that would promote livability for the community and not do damage to it.
Ellen Anderson, 3336 Glenhurst Avenue, stated her concern with the nature of the parcel of
land that is close to the neighborhood. She felt it is new territory to merge mixed-use
commercial with residential and should be looked at more closely allowing other options on
how to merge them.
Wells Anderson, 3336 Glenhurst Avenue, stated his support to changing the Comprehensive
Plan and requested that the two most northerly lots remain as mixed density residential. He
further urged Council to only do a three-lot change versus a five-lot change. Mr. Anderson
also stated concern with the traffic and a change could affect that. Mr. Anderson concluded
by suggesting that Council take the livable community factors into account.
Mayor Pro Tem Sanger asked staff if it would be possible to only change three of the five
parcels. Mr. Locke stated it could create confusion if the Comprehensive Plan and zoning
designation weren’t treated as one. He further stated the planned unit development process
would provide for the Council to put any number of conditions and controls on the site.
Mr. Anderson stated he didn’t have a concern with the future developer’s restrictions, stating
nothing is for sure and stated he understood that the entire lot would be easier if zoned as
one zoning classification.
Mr. Locke stated Mr. Anderson has a valid concern and it’s something that would need to be
addressed. He stated the goal is that rezoning and planned unit development would come
together at one time and considered together. Mr. Locke suggested the question of what
happens if things don’t turn out as expected, should be addressed.
Councilmember Finkelstein felt a Comprehensive Plan revision made sense with the
reversion. He further stated he felt there was a change in the condition, as was questioned by
Mr. Miller, stating Excelsior Blvd has changed. He went on state that Council has asked the
developer and previous developers if they could deal with the motel at the same time and
were told nothing was available and they did not have a reasonable price. Councilmember
Finkelstein also noted the motel has been shut down and any suspicious activity should be
reported to the police department. Councilmember Finkelstein felt it was a reasonable plan
that wouldn’t overwhelm the neighborhood, which would still allow light to come in, is
interesting and would leave some green space. He further stated it isn’t perfect and advised
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 3a) Page 9
Subject: City Council Minutes September 15, 2008
the developer to work hard with the neighborhood to come up with ideas on the buffer.
Councilmember Finkelstein went on to state they have not made any TIF decisions and they
would look at the numbers carefully as they go through the process. He thought the project
made sense, as long as they could get an acceptable reversion process as suggested by
Councilmember Basill.
Councilmember Paprocki stated the project has to stand on its own merits and that he
would be in support of the project with an acceptable reversion process.
Councilmember Omodt reminded everyone that the issue was a Comprehensive Plan change
and the State required the City to look at the Comprehensive Plan every ten years, which
they are in the process of doing. He stated it would be nice to include the hotel site, but at
this time it’s just not possible. He liked the thought the combining the lots into one parcel.
Councilmember Omodt felt that staff and the Planning Commission had done their jobs
and would be voting in favor of it.
Councilmember Basill stated it looked like a good quality project and reminded the
developer that they need to work with the neighborhood. He further reiterated that Council
felt the need to protect the City.
It was moved by Councilmember Basill, seconded by Councilmember Omodt to adopt
Resolution No. 08-121 amending the Comprehensive Plan to re-guide the land use
designation for 3408 and 3412 France Avenue South; and, 3409, 3413 and 3417 Glenhurst
Avenue South, from RM – Medium Density Residential to CMX – Commercial Mixed Use,
subject to Metropolitan Council approval.
It was moved by Councilmember Basill, seconded by Councilmember Omodt to direct staff
to initiate the comprehensive plan amendment process to re-guide the land use designation
for 3408 and 3412 France Avenue South; and, 3409, 3413 and 3417 Glenhurst Avenue
South, from CMX – Commercial Mixed Use back to RM- Medium Density Residential
should any of the following things happen: 1. a completed application for a Planned Unit
Development (PUD) consistent with Bader Development’s five story, mixed-use
development concept plan as described in the September, 15, 2008 City Council meeting
staff report for Agenda Item #8c is not received by October 15, 2008; or, 2 the completed
PUD application is withdrawn; or, 3. the completed PUD application is denied; or, 4. the
PUD approval expires.
Councilmember Finkelstein asked Mr. Scott if more dates or times were needed in any of the
conditions. Mr. Scott suggested a date in the first condition such as 30 days for a completed
application.
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 3a) Page 10
Subject: City Council Minutes September 15, 2008
Councilmember Finkelstein asked if it would be something that could be extended with the
current uncertain economic times. Mr. Scott clarified that if they did not submit a
completed application within 30 days, it would direct staff to initiate to re-guide the
property back. He further stated Council would have the ability to reconsider those hard
deadlines.
Paula Merrigan, inquired about the 60 day review of the application and if it could be
changed to match 60 day timeframe. Mr. Scott clarified that they need to submit the
application and the City would have 15 business days to let them know if it is complete or
not.
Mayor Pro Tem Sanger suggested that the zoning be changed to be consistent.
Councilmember Basill stated that would be a friendly amendment and wished to add it to
the amendment. He clarified the purpose of this change.
Mayor Pro Tem Sanger pointed out there were two motions for approval.
Mr. Scott suggested a motion to approve the Comp Plan amendment and then a motion for
the re-guiding back, which was amended by the maker and the second.
Mayor Pro Tem Sanger stated support for the change and felt it would be a much better land
use and project. She explained that it is difficult to deal with conflicting parcels in different
zoning districts.
Councilmember Paprocki thanked the residents for their comments.
The motion regarding the comprehensive plan amendment passed 5-0.
It was moved by Councilmember Finkelstein as a friendly amendment for 30 days to receive
a completed application.
The motion directing staff to initiate a comprehensive plan amendment back to Medium
Density Residential in the event of certain circumstances passed 5-0.
Mayor Pro Tem Sanger suggested staff utilize sunset clauses on all projects going forward.
Mayor Pro Tem Sanger thanked everyone for their participation and comments.
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 3a) Page 11
Subject: City Council Minutes September 15, 2008
8d. I-394 MnPASS Phase II Planning Study
Ken Buckeye, Project Manager, summarized the I-394 MnPASS Phase II Planning Study
and requested the City pass resolution to support the study and their recommendations.
Councilmember Omodt thanked Mr. Buckeye for his report and stated his frustration with
Mn/DOT by explaining the City’s previous project requests and no follow-through
guarantees. Councilmember Omodt asked if Mr. Buckeye had a realistic time frame for
completion. Mr. Buckeye stated they would need to compete in the programming process
for the money, stating there were no guarantees that it would be programmed or funded
within the next four years.
Councilmember Omodt stated the projects seemed like good ones, but his trust in Mn/DOT
was quite low and would not be supporting the request.
Mr. Buckeye explained their resolutions of support would hold weight when they submit
them for programming and would have an impact on prioritizing future projects.
Councilmember Paprocki stated he was frustrated with Mn/DOT pretending to do
something when they were not. He further stated he would not be in support of a resolution
that may or may not get funded.
Councilmember Finkelstein suggested the Task Force look at widening Hwy 100 and
cleaning up entrance and exit ramps.
Mr. Buckeye explained the present study was focused on MnPASS lanes and how it would
benefit the corridor.
Councilmember Basill thanked Mr. Buckeye for coming, stating they have had problems
with Mn/DOT and suggested he relay the Council’s concerns about the Hwy 100 build out
back to Mn/DOT.
Mayor Pro Tem Sanger asked if MnPASS had a citizen advisory task force and if they had
received any public input. Mr. Buckeye stated Phase I allowed for public input, further
stating Phase II was a planning study, not an implementation project.
Mayor Pro Tem Sanger stated she shared Council’s distrust and would not be in support of
the resolution.
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 3a) Page 12
Subject: City Council Minutes September 15, 2008
9. Communications
Mr. Harmening gave recognition the Park and Rec Department for their initiatives. He also stated
the City recently received a Top Nationwide Award for Webmasters in Design and Function and
also received the Members Choice Award. He recognized Jason Hubner for his hard work and
effort that he had put into the City’s website, and thanked Council for all their support to make this
happen.
Councilmember Omodt noted that that they would be renaming the field at Watertower Park on
Saturday, September 20th at 2:00 p.m. in favor of Dave Petit, for his years of volunteering and
dedicated service working on the fields.
10. Adjournment
The meeting adjourned at 10:48 p.m.
______________________________________ ______________________________________
Nancy Stroth, City Clerk Jeff Jacobs, Mayor
Meeting Date: October 20, 2008
Agenda Item #: 3b
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL STUDY SESSION
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
OCTOBER 6, 2008
The meeting convened at 6:00 p.m.
Councilmembers present: Mayor Jeff Jacobs, John Basill, C. Paul Carver, Phil Finkelstein, Paul
Omodt, Loran Paprocki and Susan Sanger.
Councilmembers absent: None
Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), Planning and Zoning Supervisor (Ms. McMonigal)
Senior Planner (Mr. Walther) and Recording Secretary (Ms. Schmidt).
Guests: None
1. Vision Strategic Directions Update – Increasing Use of New and Existing Gathering
Places
Ms. McMonigal presented the staff report.
Councilmember Basill suggested making the Melrose Institute corner a gathering place since it’s still
in the planning stages. He further stated he felt they were moving in the right direction and liked
the idea of benches in developments. Councilmember Basill stated he hoped they could tie it all
together with a community center.
Mr. Harmening stated staff would be doing further investigation on a community center.
Councilmember Paprocki suggested investigating ideas on how to get people to use the areas for
networking, such as at light rail stops.
Councilmember Sanger stated she felt they were getting away from the original intent for gathering
places. She further stated she interpreted it to mean indoor facilities where people could go without
official sanctioned programming and asked for more clarity on what the vision goal actually is.
Councilmember Sanger liked the direction staff was going and suggested they focus on developing
concepts of what kind of places are needed and the criteria of where they should be.
Councilmember Finkelstein liked the thought of outdoor impromptu gathering places.
Councilmember Sanger asked if staff was looking at places to use for free or renting them.
Ms. McMonigal stated they were looking at mixed uses, such as public, religious, coffee shops and
restaurant with rooms and park shelter buildings. She also stated they were connecting with the
Parks & Recreation Department to get a sense for the type of needs.
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 3b) Page 2
Subject: City Council Special Study Session Minutes October 6, 2008
Mr. Harmening stated staff would be working at changing and enhancing on how they do future
projects in order to create gathering place opportunities. He stated they would also be creating a
document that would inventory gathering places.
Ms. McMonigal stated that staff has provided two community wide surveys for feedback.
Mr. Harmening stated staff has also received data from various action teams on the types of
gathering places needed in the community.
Councilmember Basill suggested staff look at what can be provided for both green and community
space when application proposals are submitted. He also suggested a survey be completed to provide
the amount of time involved and amount of money being spent on the gathering places analysis.
It was the consensus of Council to have staff move forward with the exploration of gathering places.
2. Vision Strategic Directions Update – Expand Network of Sidewalks and Trails
Mr. Walther presented the staff report.
Councilmember Sanger asked if the sidewalks were grade separated. Mr. Walther stated they were
not.
Councilmember Finkelstein asked about walking distances. Mr. Walther stated approximately a
quarter mile.
Councilmember Finkelstein asked if staff was working with the school district. Mr. Walther stated
staff has been in contact with a rep from school district and they stated concern with the kids’ safety
walking to bus stops.
Councilmember Sanger asked if they would be able to differentiate city sidewalks and neighborhood
sidewalks. Mr. Walther stated the biggest problem was snow shoveling and whether to do all the
sidewalks or none.
Councilmember Sanger asked the difference between a bike trail versus bike way. Mr. Walther
stated a trail was for off-road type use, whereas a way would have a designated bike lane, which
would include on-street usage.
Councilmember Sanger asked why some roads, such as Cedar Lake Road, had nothing listed or
marked. Mr. Walther stated that Cedar Lake Road is a proposed bike route.
Councilmember Paprocki liked the direction staff was taking and suggested taking a position of not
shoveling the sidewalks.
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 3b) Page 3
Subject: City Council Special Study Session Minutes October 6, 2008
Mr. Harmening suggested staff do more investigation on the costs involved in clearing all sidewalks.
He also conveyed to Council that the neighborhood response to clearing their portions of sidewalks
and keeping them in compliance has been positive.
Councilmember Sanger suggested staff talk more with neighborhoods for their feedback on installing
sidewalks.
Ms. McMonigal stated most neighborhoods do not want to pay to have them put in or be assessed
for them.
Mr. Harmening stated the City has been paying to improve the sidewalks and the property owners
have been paying to maintain them.
Councilmember Omodt asked if other cities shovel all the sidewalks. Mr. Walther stated most only
provide the service for major sidewalks.
Councilmember Paprocki suggested putting out a special bond and having the community vote on
it. Councilmember Carver and Councilmember Finkelstein thought it was their job as the
community elected voices to make these decisions.
Councilmember Sanger also agreed with Councilmember Carver and felt it was their job to deal
with it and sell it to the community.
It was the consensus of Council to have staff to move forward and bring back more information on
sidewalk options.
The meeting adjourned at 7:02 p.m.
______________________________________ ______________________________________
Nancy Stroth, City Clerk Jeff Jacobs, Mayor
Meeting Date: October 20, 2008
Agenda Item #: 3c
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
OCTOBER 6, 2008
1. Call to Order
Mayor Jacobs called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
Councilmembers present: Mayor Jeff Jacobs, John Basill, C. Paul Carver, Phil Finkelstein, Paul
Omodt, Loran Paprocki and Susan Sanger.
Councilmembers absent: None
Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), City Attorney (Mr. Scott), Management Assistant
(Ms. Honold), Community Development Director (Mr. Locke), Planning & Zoning Supervisor
(Ms. McMonigal), Senior Planner (Mr. Walther) and Recording Secretary (Ms. Schmidt).
2. Presentations – None
3. Approval of Minutes
3a. City Council Study Session Minutes August 25, 2008
It was noted on page two, item #2, the fourth paragraph, should state: “… to the ordinance
in order to get around the smoking ban. “… you can fall down a slippery slope.”
It was noted on page four, item #3, the first paragraph, last sentence should state: “… also
questioned how many changes can be made on what was applied for on the TIF
application.”
3b. City Council Study Session Minutes September 8, 2008
It was noted on page 11, item #6, the third paragraph, add sentence to state: “Mr. Locke
stated it sounded reasonable and staff would look into it.”
It was noted on page six, item #4, the 3rd paragraph, third sentence: “…if they were going
to extend a road to the west end…”
It was noted on page two, item #2, the third paragraph, first sentence should state: “and he
understands the difference …”
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 3c) Page 2
Subject: City Council Minutes September 15, 2008
3c. Special City Council Minutes September 22, 2008
It was noted on page one, Councilmember absent: Mayor Jeff Jacobs and Loran Paprocki.
3d. City Council Study Session Minutes September 22, 2008
It was noted on page six, item #4, the second paragraph, last sentence should state: “… do
not have children and that we should market to residents who don’t have children.”
It was noted on page three, item #2, the second paragraph, last sentence should state:
“…routed north and south trains…”
It was noted on page three, item #2, the third paragraph, first sentence should state: “… was
sent to the Policy Advisory Committee (PAC).”
It was noted on page three, item #2, the third paragraph, second sentence should state:
“…Kenilworth corridors, possibly by moving…”
It was noted on page four, item #2, the sixth paragraph, last sentence should state: “…,
which was granted.”
It was noted on page five, item #3, the seventh paragraph, last sentence should state: “…
with these types of functions.”
It was noted on page six, item #5, the first paragraph, should state: “City Manager
Harmening presented the staff report…”
4. Approval of Agenda and Items on Consent Calendar
NOTE: The Consent Calendar lists those items of business which are considered to be routine
and/or which need no discussion. Consent items are acted upon by one motion. If discussion is
desired by either a Councilmember or a member of the audience, that item may be moved to an
appropriate section of the regular agenda for discussion.
4a. Adopt Resolution No. 08-122, appointing student election judges and additional
regular election judges needed to staff the polls at the General Election to be held
November 4, 2008.
4b. Amend Professional Services Agreement with Campbell Knutson to increase city
attorney services rates by 3.5% starting January 1, 2009.
4c. Approve Second Reading to Adopt Ordinance No. 2360-08 amending Sections 4-
81 through 4-89 concerning dogs, approve summary, and authorize publication.
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 3c) Page 3
Subject: City Council Minutes September 15, 2008
4d. Adopt Resolution No. 08-123, accepting the Project Report, Establishing
Improvement Project No. 2006-2000, approving Plans and Specifications, and
Authorizing Advertisement for Bids for Improvement Project No. 2006-2000.
4e. Adopt Resolution No. 08-124 establishing a special assessment for the repair of the
sewer service line at 5925 West 34th Street.
4f. Approve Change Order No. 1 to Contract 72-08 - Street Project – Park Place
Boulevard – Project No. 2007-1101.
4g. Adopt Resolution No. 08-125 approving Traffic Control Signal Agreement No.
93080-R and authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to execute the agreement –
Street Project – Park Place Boulevard – Project No. 2007-1101.
4h. Approve Encroachment Agreement with 4349 Browndale Avenue for use of City
right-of-way for two (2) retaining walls.
4i. Approve Amendment No. 1 to Contract 06-08 - Water Project - WTP #8 Filter
Rehabilitation - Project 2006-2000.
4j. Adopt Resolution No. 08-126 to enter into a lease agreement between the City and
TTM Operating Corporation, Inc. (TTM) for space on the water tower at 2541
Nevada Avenue for a communications antenna.
4k. Approve the Third Amendment to the Contract for Private Redevelopment By and
Between St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority, the City of St. Louis
Park, and Highway 7 Business Center LLC.
4l. Approve Change Order No. 1 to Contract 113-07 – Furnish Decorative Street
Lighting for Excelsior Boulevard Streetscape Project – Project No. 2004-0100.
4m. Adopt Resolution No. 08-127 authorizing final payment in the amount of
$33,509.48 for furnishing of decorative street lighting poles and fixtures, banner
poles, and luminaries, Project No. 2004-0400 with Carlo Lachmansingh Sales, Inc.,
City Contract No. 113-07.
4n. Approve the Assignment, Assumption and Consent to Assignment relating to the
Purchase and Redevelopment Contract between the EDA and Oak Hill 3501 LLC.
4o. Approve for filing Planning Commission Minutes September 3, 2008.
4p. Approve for filing Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Minutes May 21,
2008.
4q. Approve for filing Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Minutes September
3, 2008.
4r. Approve for filing Vendor Claims.
It was moved by Councilmember Sanger, seconded by Councilmember Finkelstein, to
approve the Agenda and items listed on the Consent Calendar.
The motion passed 7-0.
5. Boards and Commissions - None
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 3c) Page 4
Subject: City Council Minutes September 15, 2008
6. Public Hearings
6a. Public Hearing on 1st Reading 2009 Fee Schedule Appendix A
Ms. Honold presented the staff report.
No speakers present. Mayor Jacobs closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Sanger asked if the Certificate of Property Maintenance fees applied to Co-
op units. Ms. Honold stated that Mr. Hoffman would be addressing that when he brings
the additional rental information forward. Councilmember Sanger stated she wanted to
make sure they were addressed. Ms. Honold stated she would make note of the inquiry.
It was moved by Councilmember Omodt, seconded by Councilmember Finkelstein, to
approve 1st Reading of Ordinance adopting fees for 2009 and Set Second Reading for
October 20, 2008.
The motion passed 7-0.
7. Requests, Petitions, and Communications from the Public – None
8. Resolutions, Ordinances, Motions and Discussion Items
8a. First Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendments relating to Towers and
Antennas
Ms. McMonigal presented the staff report explaining key issues of height, setback,
interference, aesthetics and environmental considerations.
Mr. Locke noted that the area of radio interference from broadcast towers on adjoining
properties was not included, other than how it relates to public safety equipment. He
suggested adding language to require the tower owner to work with neighboring property
owners to resolve any radio interference problems that might happen on adjoining
properties. Mr. Locke stated staff spent a lot of time discussing the height issue, since it
seemed to be the biggest concern. He further noted staff concluded that the most straight
forward to handle the setback requirement was to simply require a setback from all property
lines equal to the height of the tower. Mr. Locke also noted that there is interest in pursuing
a tower on the Dahl property and they would like to speak on the issue. He further stated
that they might not be able to build the tower the want without seeking a variance. Mr.
Locke stated that the proposed language, which states a tower cannot be located in a wetland
or floodplain, may also make it difficult for a tower to be located on the Dahl property. The
City Council may want to change that language simply rely on the existing general rules
regarding building in wetlands and floodplain.
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 3c) Page 5
Subject: City Council Minutes September 15, 2008
Thomas Christiansen, 2170 Ridge Drive, stated that the proposed tower was fundamentally
different than other towers presented and would be required to be lit with strobe lights
because of the height; and, also stated concern that towers will affect adjacent property
values.
Claire Christianson, 2744 Georgia Avenue, stated she was adamantly opposed and
questioned why the City would be willing to accommodate an Edina business when the City
would gain nothing but a large tower.
Jared Andrews, 7000 Hemlock Ln, Suite 300, Maple Grove, stated he was a consultant with
the applicant and would be willing to answer any questions Council may have.
Tom Louck, 7800 Hemlock Ln, Suite 300, Maple Grove, stated he was a consultant
working with Chris Dahl to assist in processing the application. He further stated that the
proposed ordinance stating towers cannot be located within the in wetland conservation
district would complicate and possibly prohibit their request. He further stated that they
would be able to comply with the Wetland Conservation District rules, but to comply with
the proposed ordinance they would need to secure a variance to do so.
Councilmember Sanger stated the proposed ordinance was not specific to the application of
Mr. Dahl.
Philip Hogland, 2716 Vernon Avenue South, stated that he is an amateur radio user and the
proposed ordinance would cause great difficulty for him to operate. Mr. Hogland stated he
had more details and concerns and would be presenting them in a letter to Council for their
review.
Councilmember Paprocki stated concern with the somewhat contradictory statement under
Sec. 36-142 Descriptions item (1).
Ms. McMonigal stated the difference is Ham radios are for private enjoyment and the
intention is that they would be treated differently. She further stated that staff would look at
the language to clarify it better.
Councilmember Sanger read a memo sent from resident Lisa Robinson, stating her concern
and requesting Council consider the negative impact any change will have on the residents of
St. Louis Park. She further stated concern with the potential radio interference and aesthetic
impact on the residential neighborhood and the nuisance of the tower being lit.
Councilmember Sanger stated she received several emails throughout the years involving
radio interference of phone and other equipment from communications towers currently on
Mr. Dahl’s property. She stated the language only addressed interference of public safety
equipment, but not private property owners and suggested additional language be added to
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 3c) Page 6
Subject: City Council Minutes September 15, 2008
page 24, Sect. J, Sub 4, stating additional submittal requirements should include a letter of
intent committing the tower owner to promptly resolve all complaints that the tower may be
creating from radio interference with another property owner’s usage of radio, phones, or
other communication devices.
Councilmember Sanger also requested a statement be submitted from operators stating that
they were ready to promptly address concerns.
Councilmember Sanger also proposed an amendment be added on page 21, Sec E, stating
towers exceeding 70 feet in height shall be setback a distance equal to twice the height of the
tower from all property lines abutting parcels in the R-1, R02, R03 and R-4 districts, and
equal to the tower height from all other property lines and buildings not accessory to the
tower.
Councilmember Omodt stated the communication tower issue arose because an application
came for a tower, and the ordinance that was written wasn’t clear. He further asked if the
lights on the tower would be angled up or down.
George Werl, 4833 E Lake Harriet Parkway, Consulting Inc., stated that under 200’ lights
are not required. He further stated that the four towers that are currently there do have
lights and there is no plan to do strobe lights at this point. Mr. Werl stated the lights would
be similar to what’s already around town, such as the KQRS tower, unpainted, strobed
during the day, with the strobe angled toward the horizon.
Councilmember Omodt asked about the fall radius.
Mr. Werl stated it has multiple guide points and would hold its position, collapsing like an
accordion, with a radius of approximately 25% of the tower height.
Councilmember Omodt asked for the facts on what type of radio interference may occur.
Mr. Werl stated that they are required by the FCC to resolve problems that may arise the
first year. He further stated that wouldn’t absolve the broadcaster from working with
residents after that time had expired. He further stated in the past, they have had some
garage door and phone issues.
Councilmember Sanger asked about the visibility of the lights towards the horizon and if
they would be seen a farther distance from the sides.
Mr. Werl stated they would have red lights at night and white strobes during the day,
perhaps being more visible from a further distance.
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 3c) Page 7
Subject: City Council Minutes September 15, 2008
Councilmember Paprocki stated concern with the aesthetics and safety, stating there is
language in the proposal that would allow rejecting on the basis of the aesthetics of the lights
unless they are mandated by the FCC. He further asked if they could reject the application
because of those aesthetics.
Mr. Locke stated they would have to follow the FCC requirements.
Mr. Scott stated if Councilmember Paprocki has concern with the aesthetics and lit poles,
they should consider keeping the height limit at 200’.
Councilmember Paprocki asked if there was any other zoning where buildings weren’t
allowed on wetlands or floodplains.
Ms. McMonigal stated there is a floodplain overlay ordinance that is very restrictive on what
can be done in the floodplain, stating the City is under their rules.
Councilmember Finkelstein asked if Council agrees to the ordinance changes, would they
find other radio stations migrating to the City.
Mr. Locke suggested if the goal is to be more restrictive, they would need to make some type
of amendment to make the ordinance more restrictive. He further stated he is uncertain of
the demand for this type of tower.
Councilmember Finkelstein asked for clarification on making the setback requirements 1½
times for R1, R2 and R3, and adding R4 to make it consistent, asking why it’s proposed to
eliminate R4.
Mr. Locke stated staff attempted to make it consistent, stating double height setback was
more than what was needed.
Ms. McMonigal stated staff’s thought was that the individual operators wouldn’t be able to
meet the setback requirement.
Councilmember Carver stated the language is being changed in an effort to find clarity on
the ordinance’s interpretation. He further stated the choices are to either to do something or
nothing and leave it as is. Councilmember Carver stated they needed to rewrite an
ordinance that would work for today and also work with future technology. He also stated a
system set up for solving problems with interference should be included in the ordinance.
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 3c) Page 8
Subject: City Council Minutes September 15, 2008
Councilmember Sanger stated Council had not discussed a 400’ height tower but had
discussed the need for an ordinance making it adaptable to future technology. She further
stressed they need to be consistent with height and the setback requirements and the concern
needed to be addressed. Councilmember Sanger reiterated Councilmember Finkelstein’s
question on migration, noting that she has been informed of another radio station observing
the outcome decision and that may want to locate in St. Louis Park.
Councilmember Finkelstein agreed they needed to come up with something to clarify the
language and asked if they should vote on the Councilmember Sanger’s amendments
separately.
Councilmember Carver reminded Council that Mr. Hogland wanted to submit an outlined
letter of issues and concerns and suggested Council table or continue the discussion so that
letter, as well as the issues brought up can be addressed. Councilmember Carver also asked
Mr. Harmening if a tower would count as an improvement and increase property taxes.
Mr. Harmening stated it would have some impact on the property value if it were creating
more income.
Councilmember Basill agreed with Councilmember Carver, stating it should be looked at
more in its entirety and is open to continuing the discussion. He would like to review mixed
use and parks and open space in more detail. Councilmember Basill stated that they could
still provide controls through public process, CUP’s and variances.
Councilmember Paprocki agreed to continue the discussion, since he has concerns with the
collapse radius, wetlands and floodplain, power interference and aesthetics.
Councilmember Finkelstein also agreed to continue, stating concern with the CUP for both
office and industrial and requested staff find out what the surrounding communities are
doing.
Mayor Jacobs stated he would prefer to go forward and get answers before it comes before
them again.
Terry Moore, 3300 Edinborough Way #601, broadcast attorney, explained that moving a
radio station was extremely difficult and expensive to do, further stating there would be a low
likelihood of them migrating to St. Louis Park.
Councilmember Omodt asked Mr. Locke if staff knew the number of parcels that would
allow towers.
Mr. Locke stated staff hasn’t had an opportunity to review that yet. He further stated the
conditions could be set in the CUP.
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 3c) Page 9
Subject: City Council Minutes September 15, 2008
Mr. Locke asked Mr. Scott if time allowed them to continue the item.
Mr. Scott stated they legally could continue the discussion.
Councilmember Omodt asked Councilmember Sanger if she knew who the interested radio
station was.
Councilmember Sanger stated she could not give that information.
Mr. Moore stated he is unaware of anyone interested in coming to St. Louis Park.
Councilmember Paprocki asked if they could turn the lights on the exiting towers for
everyone to get an idea of what the look would be.
Mr. Werl stated it would be too costly and advised people to look at the KQ tower, stating it
would look like that.
It was moved by Councilmember Carver, seconded by Councilmember Basill, to continue
the discussion to a study session on October 20th.
Councilmember Basill suggested staff provide input for the following items: park and open
space, mixed use, address Mr. Hogland’s concerns in his letter, monopole clarification; a 1:1
setback requirement, further analysis on fall radius; limiting the number of towers; language
on how to handle disputes with interference and the lights.
Councilmember Omodt requested information on wetland restrictions and designation of
whom is the controlling body regarding wetlands; and the facts on the proliferation of
interference.
Councilmember Finkelstein requested information on what the surrounding communities
are doing.
Mr. Harmening suggesting setting study session for October 20th.
Councilmember Omodt suggested people with concerns send them in writing.
Councilmember Paprocki stated the upcoming study session is for Council discussion.
Councilmember Basill stated that the public was welcome to attend and listen in at that
discussion.
The motion passed 7-0.
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 3c) Page 10
Subject: City Council Minutes September 15, 2008
8b. Minor Amendment to West End PUD for Grocery Store, 1570 16th Street
West, Case No. 08-32-PUD
Resolution No. 08-128
Mr. Walther presented the staff report.
David Bade, Duke Realty, presented updated elevations.
Mike Schmidt, Roundy’s, briefed on type of store that will be at location.
Councilmember Sanger stated concern with the parking and possible gridlock. She asked
what the standards were for determining the amount.
Mr. Walther stated parking counts were already approved by City Council in the Final
PUD, and stated there are approximately 200 surface parking stalls, along with shared
parking available across the street.
Mr. Schmidt stated that employees will be required to park in the parking structure across
the street to leave more surface parking stalls available to customers. He further stated the
store size and presentation will attract daily, quick shopping and the average order size will
be smaller than larger supermarket stores, but will still provide a wide variety of products.
Councilmember Finkelstein liked the idea of this type of grocery store and stated it will be a
great amenity He further stated he is glad there will not be a sea of parking.
Councilmember Sanger stated she liked the proposed art and graphics for the west wall
facing West End Blvd.
It was moved by Councilmember Sanger, seconded by Councilmember Omodt, to adopt the
Minor Amendment to the Final PUD for West End, subject to conditions in the resolution.
The motion passed 7-0.
9. Communications
Mayor Jacobs thanked Councilmember Sanger for running the September 22nd Council meeting.
Councilmember Sanger reminded the community to register to vote by October 14th.
Mr. Harmening stated staff has received international recognition for comprehensive approach in the
establishment of the graffiti net database.
Councilmember Paprocki stated people could educate themselves through the candidate’s websites
and/or League of Woman’s Voters, as well as neighbors.
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 3c) Page 11
Subject: City Council Minutes September 15, 2008
10. Adjournment
The meeting adjourned at 9:56 p.m.
______________________________________ ______________________________________
Nancy Stroth, City Clerk Jeff Jacobs, Mayor
Meeting Date: October 20, 2008
Agenda Item #: 4a
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Suspension of Local Gambling Tax.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to Adopt Resolution Suspending Collection of Local Gambling Tax for 2009.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Does the Council wish to extend the suspension of the local gambling tax through 2009?
BACKGROUND:
Staff presented information in 2005 regarding the positive fund balance used to enforce and
administer gambling in the City of St. Louis Park. Cities which collect a local gambling tax to pay
for administrative costs are required to submit an annual report showing the fund balance. If a
positive fund balance exists, the city must justify the reason for maintaining the positive fund
balance, or refund the money directly to the organizations that contributed to the fund.
Council suspended the local tax on lawful gambling in 2005 and extended the suspension of
gambling tax through 2008. In addition, Council amended the ordinance on October 10, 2005,
changing the tax from 2% of gross receipts to three-quarter of a percent (0.0075%).
Finance reports that the charitable gambling fund balance is approximately $14,000, which is
$2,000 less than it was in October 2007. The fund balance will cover administration and
enforcement costs related to charitable gambling for 2009. Finance staff is developing
recommendations for Council on this issue, and will return with recommendations for Council’s
consideration prior to the 2010 budget discussions.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
Finance staff will be returning to the Council in 2009 to discuss in greater detail how the city
collects gambling taxes. This suspension will not have any affect on the city’s ability to administer or
oversee charitable gambling in 2009.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
Attachments: Resolution Suspending Collection of the Local Charitable Gambling Tax
Prepared by: Marcia Honold, Management Assistant
Reviewed by: Bruce DeJong, Finance Director
Approved by: Nancy Gohman, Deputy City Manager/HR Director
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 4a) Page 2
Subject: Suspension of Local Gambling Tax
RESOLUTION NO. 08-___
RESOLUTION SUSPENDING COLLECTION OF
THE LOCAL CHARITABLE GAMBLING TAX
WHEREAS, St. Louis Park City Code Section 15-9 requires that charitable gambling
organizations operating in the city pay a tax to the city which can only be used to fund the city’s
efforts in administration and enforcement of gambling; and
WHEREAS, a positive tax fund balance exists that will adequately provide the city with
resources needed to fully fund gambling administration and enforcement operations through 2009;
and
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that collection of the charitable gambling tax is
hereby suspended for the calendar year 2009 effective upon passage of this resolution.
LET IT BE FURTHER RESOLVED that the suspension be reevaluated prior to calendar
year 2010.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council October 20, 2008
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Meeting Date: October 20, 2008
Agenda Item #: 4b
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Temporary Liquor License B’nai Emet Women’s League.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to Approve Temporary On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for B’nai Emet Women’s
League, 3115 Ottawa Avenue South, for the 2nd Annual “Kosher International Food and Wine
Expo” to be held at B’nai Emet Synagogue on November 15, 2008 from 7:30 to 9:30 p.m.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Does Council wish to approve the Temporary On-Sales Intoxicating Liquor License so that B’nai
Emet Women’s League can serve intoxicating liquor at their 2nd Annual “Kosher International Food
and Wine Expo” at B’nai Emet Synagogue on November 15?
BACKGROUND:
On September 22, 2008, B’nai Emet Women’s League notified the City they were interested in
applying for a permit to allow alcohol at their upcoming Kosher International Food and Wine Expo.
City Ordinance 3-57(8) requires council approval of temporary liquor licenses.
The Kosher International Food and Wine Expo is a fundraising effort of not only the B’nai Emet
Women’s League, but their Men’s Club as well, and the funds raised during this event help to
maintain the programs underwritten by these two affiliates. Samples of Kosher foods will be offered
by a variety of caterers, along with a presentation of Kosher wines. Wines may be ordered through
the synagogue for pick up at a later date. Admission to the event is $20 per person. Reservations are
requested, however admission will be available at the door.
The Police Department has completed the background investigation on the main principals and has
found no reason to deny the temporary license. The applicant has met all requirements for issuance
of the license and staff is recommending approval at this time for B’nai Emet Women’s League for
their event on November 15, 2008.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
The total fee for this applicant is $50.00 payable to the Minnesota Department of Public Safety.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable
Attachments: None
Prepared by: Lisa Songle, Office Assistant
Reviewed by: Nancy Stroth, City Clerk
Approved by: Nancy Gohman, Deputy City Manager/HR Director
Meeting Date: October 20, 2008
Agenda Item #: 4c
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Purchase Agreement for 5724 Goodrich Avenue.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to approve and authorize execution by the Mayor and City Manager of the attached
Purchase Agreement for 5724 Goodrich Avenue.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Consideration of acquisition of property to expand the Fire Station #1 (Wooddale location) site.
BACKGROUND:
Over the past few months the city’s acquisition/relocation consultant has been negotiating the
purchase of three parcels located directly to the south of Fire Station #1. Agreement has been
reached on terms for all three properties and purchase agreements executed by the sellers are ready
for City Council approval on two of them. Attached is the purchase agreement for the William and
Julie Beach property at 5724 Goodrich. The agreed-to purchase price for the Beach property is
$253,000.
The purchase agreement has been prepared by the city attorney’s office and the terms and price are
consistent with the city’s appraisal and review appraisal of the property. The city will be responsible
for the closing costs and the seller is responsible for real estate taxes. The closing is planned for
10/31 for the Beach’s. The city is also responsible for relocation expenses any time it acquires
property. In this case that primarily means the moving costs for the property owners and any
tenants they may have.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
The acquisition cost is consistent with the projections previously prepared in planning for replacing
the city’s fire stations. The cost has been included in the budgets for the fire station replacement
project.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
Attachments: Purchase Agreement for 5724 Goodrich Avenue
Prepared by: Kevin Locke, Community Development Director
Approved by: Nancy Gohman, Deputy City Manager/HR Director
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 4c)
Subject: Purchase Agreement for 5724 Goodrich Avenue Page 2
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 4c)
Subject: Purchase Agreement for 5724 Goodrich Avenue Page 3
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 4c)
Subject: Purchase Agreement for 5724 Goodrich Avenue Page 4
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 4c)
Subject: Purchase Agreement for 5724 Goodrich Avenue Page 5
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 4c)
Subject: Purchase Agreement for 5724 Goodrich Avenue Page 6
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 4c)
Subject: Purchase Agreement for 5724 Goodrich Avenue Page 7
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 4c)
Subject: Purchase Agreement for 5724 Goodrich Avenue Page 8
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 4c)
Subject: Purchase Agreement for 5724 Goodrich Avenue Page 9
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 4c)
Subject: Purchase Agreement for 5724 Goodrich Avenue Page 10
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 4c)
Subject: Purchase Agreement for 5724 Goodrich Avenue Page 11
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 4c)
Subject: Purchase Agreement for 5724 Goodrich Avenue Page 12
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 4c)
Subject: Purchase Agreement for 5724 Goodrich Avenue Page 13
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 4c)
Subject: Purchase Agreement for 5724 Goodrich Avenue Page 14
Meeting Date: October 20, 2008
Agenda Item #: 4d
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Purchase Agreement for 3764 Wooddale Avenue.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to approve and authorize execution by the Mayor and City Manager of the attached
Purchase Agreement for 3764 Wooddale Avenue.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Consideration of acquisition of property to expand the Fire Station #1 (Wooddale location) site.
BACKGROUND:
Over the past few months the city’s acquisition/relocation consultant has been negotiating the
purchase of three parcels located directly to the south of Fire Station #1. Agreement has been
reached on terms for all three properties and purchase agreements executed by the sellers are ready
for City Council approval on two of them. Attached is the purchase agreement for the Travis
Anderson property at 3764 Wooddale Avenue. The agreed-to purchase price for the Anderson
property is $230,000.
The purchase agreement has been prepared by the city attorney’s office and the terms and price are
consistent with the city’s appraisal and review appraisal of the property. The city will be responsible
for the closing costs and the seller is responsible for real estate taxes. The closing is planned for
10/28/08. The city is also responsible for relocation expenses any time it acquires property. In this
case that primarily means the moving costs for the property owners and any tenants they may have.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
The acquisition cost is consistent with the projections previously prepared in planning for replacing
the city’s fire stations. The cost has been included in the budgets for the fire station replacement
project.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
Attachments: Purchase Agreement for 3764 Wooddale Avenue
Prepared by: Kevin Locke, Community Development Director
Approved by: Nancy Gohman, Deputy City Manager/HR Director
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 4d)
Subject: Purchase Agreement for 3764 Wooddale Avenue Page 2
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 4d)
Subject: Purchase Agreement for 3764 Wooddale Avenue Page 3
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 4d)
Subject: Purchase Agreement for 3764 Wooddale Avenue Page 4
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 4d)
Subject: Purchase Agreement for 3764 Wooddale Avenue Page 5
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 4d)
Subject: Purchase Agreement for 3764 Wooddale Avenue Page 6
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 4d)
Subject: Purchase Agreement for 3764 Wooddale Avenue Page 7
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 4d)
Subject: Purchase Agreement for 3764 Wooddale Avenue Page 8
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 4d)
Subject: Purchase Agreement for 3764 Wooddale Avenue Page 9
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 4d)
Subject: Purchase Agreement for 3764 Wooddale Avenue Page 10
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 4d)
Subject: Purchase Agreement for 3764 Wooddale Avenue Page 11
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 4d)
Subject: Purchase Agreement for 3764 Wooddale Avenue Page 12
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 4d)
Subject: Purchase Agreement for 3764 Wooddale Avenue Page 13
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 4d)
Subject: Purchase Agreement for 3764 Wooddale Avenue Page 14
Meeting Date: October 20, 2008
Agenda Item #: 4e
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other: Proclamation
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Minnesota Manufacturer’s Week Proclamation.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff is recommending that the Mayor and City Council proclaim that the City of St. Louis Park
will observe the week of October 20-24, 2008 as Minnesota Manufacturer’s Week.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
None.
BACKGROUND:
Manufacturer’s Week is designed to showcase Minnesota’s diverse manufacturing industry and to
increase legislative and public awareness of the importance in providing high-wage, high-skill jobs
for our communities.
The Minnesota Chamber of Commerce, the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic
Development and the Minnesota Manufacturing Coalition are facilitating Manufacturer’s Week as a
way to recognize and promote the importance of manufacturing to the state’s economy.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
None.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
The acknowledgement of Minnesota Manufacturer’s Week by the City Council allows St. Louis
Park to continue its commitment of being a connected and engaged community.
Attachments: Proclamation
Prepared by: Lisa Songle, Office Assistant
Approved by: Nancy Gohman, Deputy City Manager/HR Director
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 4e) Page 2
Subject: Minnesota Manufacturer’s Week Proclamation
PROCLAMATION
MINNESOTA MANUFACTURERS’ WEEK
WHEREAS, the manufacturing industry is a dynamic part of Minnesota’s
economy, and promotion of this sector’s strength, success and high quality of life is an
integral part of Minnesota’s economic development strategy; and
WHEREAS, Manufacturing provides high skill, high wage jobs which
significantly contribute to Minnesota’s high standard of living and economic vitality;
and
WHEREAS, Manufacturing has the largest total payroll of any business sector
in Minnesota, providing 17.9 billion in 2007 wages; and
WHEREAS, Manufacturing produces $33.9 billion for the state economy and
is the largest share, 13.3 percent of our gross state product; and
WHEREAS, Manufactured exports brought over $16.2 billion into the
Minnesota economy in 2007.
NOW THEREFORE, let it be known that the Mayor and City Council of
the City of St. Louis Park do hereby proclaim that the week of October 20–October
24, 2008, shall be observed as Minnesota Manufacturers’ Week.
WHEREFORE, I set my hand and cause the Great Seal of
the City of St. Louis Park to be affixed this 20th day of
October, 2008.
_________________________________________
Jeff Jacobs, Mayor
Meeting Date: October 20, 2008
Agenda Item #: 4f
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Special Assessment Sewer Service Line Repair 3225 Hampshire Avenue South.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to Adopt Resolution establishing a special assessment for the repair of the sewer service line at
3225 Hampshire Avenue South.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
None - The proposed action is consistent with policy previously established by the City Council.
BACKGROUND:
Lillian Furry, owner of the single family residence at 3225 Hampshire Avenue South, has requested the City to
authorize the repair of the sewer service line for her home and assess the cost against the property in accordance
with the City’s special assessment policy.
Analysis:
The City requires the repair of service lines to promote the general public health, safety and welfare within the
community. The special assessment policy for the repair or replacement of water or sewer service lines for
existing homes was adopted by the City Council in 1996. This program was put into place because sometimes
property owners face financial hardships when emergency repairs like this are unexpectedly required.
Plans and permits for this service line repair work were completed, submitted, and approved by City staff. The
property owner hired a contractor and repaired the sewer service line in compliance with current codes and
regulations. Based on the completed work, this repair qualifies for the City’s special assessment program. The
property owner has petitioned the City to authorize the sewer service line repair and special assess the cost of
the repair. The total eligible cost of the repair has been determined to be $1,800.00.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
The City has funds in place to finance the cost of this special assessment.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Not Applicable.
Attachments: Resolution
Prepared by: Scott Anderson, Utility Superintendent
Through: Mike Rardin, Public Works Director
Bruce DeJong, Director of Finance
Approved by: Nancy Gohman, Deputy City Manager/HR Director
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 4f) Page 2
Subject: Special Assessment Sewer Service Line Repair 3225 Hampshire Avenue South
RESOLUTION NO. 08-____
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
FOR THE REPAIR OF THE SEWER SERVICE LINE AT
3225 HAMPSHIRE AVENUE SOUTH, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN
WHEREAS, the Property Owner at 3225 Hampshire Avenue South has petitioned the City of
St. Louis Park to authorize a special assessment for the repair of the sewer service line for the single family
residence located at 3225 Hampshire Avenue South; and
WHEREAS, the Property Owner has agreed to waive the right to a public hearing, right of
notice and right of appeal pursuant to Minnesota Statute, Chapter 429; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park has received a report from the
Utility Superintendent related to the repair of the sewer service line.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park,
Minnesota, that:
1. The petition from the Property Owner requesting the approval and special assessment for the sewer
service line repair is hereby accepted.
2. The sewer service line repair that was done in conformance with the plans and specifications
approved by the Public Works Department and Department of Inspections is hereby accepted.
3. The total cost for the repair of the sewer service line is accepted at $1,800.00.
4. The Property Owner has agreed to waive the right to a public hearing, notice and appeal from the
special assessment; whether provided by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, or by other statutes, or by
ordinance, City Charter, the constitution, or common law.
5. The Property Owner has agreed to pay the City for the total cost of the above improvements through
a special assessment over a ten (10) year period at the interest rate of 5.85%.
6. The Property Owner has executed an agreement with the City and all other documents necessary to
implement the repair of the sewer service line and the special assessment of all costs associated
therewith.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council October 20, 2008
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Meeting Date: October 20, 2008
Agenda Item #: 4g
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Vendor Claims.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to Accept for Filing Vendor Claims for the period October 4, 2008 through October 17,
2008.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
BACKGROUND:
The Finance Department prepares this report on a monthly basis for Council’s review.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
None.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
Attachments: Vendor Claims
Prepared by: Connie Neubeck, Account Clerk
10/16/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:46:56R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
1Page -Council Check Summary
10/17/2008 -10/04/2008
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
1,575.00INSPECTIONS G & A TRAINING10,000 LAKES CHAPTER
1,575.00
120.00INSPECTIONS G & A TRAINING10,000 LAKES CHAPTER OF ICC
120.00
179.62TREE MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESA-1 OUTDOOR POWER INC
179.62
142.02STORM WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT PARTSABLE HOSE & RUBBER INC
142.02
67.90ADMINISTRATION G & A TRAVEL/MEETINGSABRAHAMSON, LEIGH
67.90
7,236.00PRE-SCHOOL PROGRAMS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESABRAKADOODLE
7,236.00
11.75WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESACE SUPPLY CO
11.75
41.45GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT PARTSACTION FLEET INC
41.45
1,631.00WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESACZ LABORATORIES INC
1,631.00
210.45EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESADMINISTRATION RESOURCES CORP
210.45
225.00MOVE-UP PROGRAM SERVICES/MRKTG OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESALBERTSSON HANSEN ARCHITECTURE
225.00
9,350.00UNINSURED LOSS G&A UNINSURED LOSSALL ELEMENTS INC
9,350.00
272.00H.V.A.C. EQUIP. MTCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICEALLIANCE MECH SRVCS INC
272.00
336.07SEALCOAT PREPARATION OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESALLIED BLACKTOP
336.07
Meeting of October 6, 2008 (Item No. 4g)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 2
10/16/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:46:56R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
2Page -Council Check Summary
10/17/2008 -10/04/2008
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
86.82GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE OPERATIONAL SUPPLIESAMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SER
137.70PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
104.83PARK MAINTENANCE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
98.74ENTERPRISE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
44.28VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
73.59WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
73.58SEWER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
619.54
1,028.15PRINTING/REPRO SERVICES OFFICE SUPPLIESANCHOR PAPER CO
1,028.15
628.35PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESANDERSEN INC, EARL
628.35
4.00WATER UTILITY G&A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTATANDERSON, SCOTT
83.25WATER UTILITY G&A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR
775.00STORM WATER UTILITY G&A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
862.25
204.06VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A EQUIPMENT PARTSAPACHE HOSE & BELTING INC
204.06
43.90ADMINISTRATION G & A TRAVEL/MEETINGSATKINSON, KAREN
43.90
1,464.38TV PRODUCTION OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESAVI SYSTEMS INC
1,464.38
302.98BEAUTIFICATION / FLOWERS LANDSCAPING MATERIALSBACHMANS
302.98
714.85POLICE G & A SUBSISTENCE SUPPLIESBARKER, BOB COMPANY
714.85
338.00HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESBARNA, GUZY & STEFFEN LTD
338.00
4,997.50PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESBEDS AND BORDERS LANDSCAPE DES
4,997.50
Meeting of October 6, 2008 (Item No. 4g)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 3
10/16/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:46:56R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
3Page -Council Check Summary
10/17/2008 -10/04/2008
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
137.35ADMINISTRATION G & A MEETING EXPENSEBEEKS PIZZA
137.35
480.00ADULT SOFTBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESBERG, STEVE
480.00
675.00MOVE-UP PROGRAM SERVICES/MRKTG OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESBERGFORD ARCHITECTURE, JOHN
675.00
417.69ORGANIZED REC G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CARBIRNO, RICK
417.69
143.71POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIESBOUND TREE MEDICAL, LLC
7.01POLICE G & A POSTAGE
150.72
287.10GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEBOYER TRUCKS LAUDERDALE
287.10
999.71GENERAL CUSTODIAL DUTIES BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIESBRO TEX INC
999.71
30.00YOUTH PROGRAMS PROGRAM REVENUEBRYAN, JOHANNA
30.00
30.00YOUTH PROGRAMS PROGRAM REVENUEBURNS, AMY
30.00
377.01ORGANIZED REC G & A TRAININGBUSKEY, JENNIFER
377.01
15,823.40ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL SERVICESCAMPBELL KNUTSON PROF ASSOC
3,169.88WIRELESS G & A LEGAL SERVICES
18,993.28
439.36PRINTING/REPRO SERVICES RENTAL EQUIPMENTCANON FINANCIAL SERVICES
439.36
29,283.75CITY HALL BUILDING MTCE SERVICECARLSON & SON'S, J
29,283.75
Meeting of October 6, 2008 (Item No. 4g)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 4
10/16/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:46:56R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
4Page -Council Check Summary
10/17/2008 -10/04/2008
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
938.34DESKTOP SUPPORT/SERVICES EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICECARTRIDGE CARE
938.34
3,957.59INSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESCARVER, CITY OF
3,957.59
13,034.17DISCOUNT LOAN PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESCENTER ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT
1,440.00MOVE-UP PROGRAM SERVICES/MRKTG OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
25,000.00TRANSFORMATION LOAN OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
39,474.17
556.97FACILITY OPERATIONS HEATING GASCENTERPOINT ENERGY
313.71PARK MAINTENANCE G & A HEATING GAS
33.78WESTWOOD G & A HEATING GAS
60.41NATURALIST PROGRAMMER HEATING GAS
1,252.46WATER UTILITY G&A HEATING GAS
21.36REILLY G & A HEATING GAS
104.73SEWER UTILITY G&A HEATING GAS
2,343.42
8,480.00EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S OTHER RETIREMENTCENTRAL PENSION FUND
8,480.00
34.00YOUTH PROGRAMS PROGRAM REVENUECHOU, CAROLYN
34.00
92.97WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIESCINTAS FIRST AID & SAFETY
92.97
2,500.00COMM & MARKETING G & A PRINTING & PUBLISHINGCITY IMAGE COMMUNICATIONS
2,500.00
14,410.20ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL SERVICESCOLICH & ASSOCIATES
14,410.20
160.50VOICE SYSTEM MTCE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICECOLLINS COMMUNICATIONS
160.50
219.90NETWORK SUPPORT SERVICES DATACOMMUNICATIONSCOMCAST
219.90
Meeting of October 6, 2008 (Item No. 4g)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 5
10/16/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:46:56R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
5Page -Council Check Summary
10/17/2008 -10/04/2008
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
10,709.58EMERGENCY REPAIR GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP S
10,709.58
411.96BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESCONTINENTAL RESEARCH CORP
411.96
96.00ADULT SOFTBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESCOX, BARB
96.00
8.75IT G & A OFFICE SUPPLIESCROWN MARKING INC
8.75
73.01POLICE G & A SUBSISTENCE SUPPLIESCUB FOODS
48.67NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
48.68HOUSING REHAB BUDGET MEETING EXPENSE
170.36
16.09INSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESCULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER
16.09
93.36-WATER UTILITY BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTSCULVER COMPANY
1,529.65WATER UTILITY G&A OFFICE SUPPLIES
1,436.29
1,636.06BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICECUMMINS NPOWER LLC
1,636.06
84.00ADULT SOFTBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESCURRAN-MOORE, KIM
84.00
49.52SSD 1 G&A LANDSCAPING MATERIALSCUSTOM PRODUCTS & SERVICES
472.86SSD 1 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1,056.48SSD 2 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1,322.73SSD 3 G&A LANDSCAPING MATERIALS
1,782.81SSD 3 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
4,684.40
959.15GENERAL CUSTODIAL DUTIES CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SUPPLYDALCO ENTERPRISES INC
959.15
59.40YOUTH PROGRAMS PROGRAM REVENUEDAVIS, CLARE
59.40
Meeting of October 6, 2008 (Item No. 4g)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 6
10/16/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:46:56R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
6Page -Council Check Summary
10/17/2008 -10/04/2008
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
100.00RENTALRENT REVENUEDELOITTE & TOUCHE
100.00
9,371.69INSPECTIONS G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTSDEPT LABOR & INDUSTRY
9,371.69
510.00COMMUNICATIONS/GV REIMBURSEABL TELEPHONEDEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
510.00
212.25ENTERPRISE G & A ADVERTISINGDEX MEDIA EAST LLC
212.25
70.00TV PRODUCTION REPAIRSDIGITAL PICTURES INC
70.00
10,000.00PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESDJ ELECTRIC SERVICES INC
10,000.00
632.00ELECTRICAL SYSTEM MTCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICEDYMANYK ELECTRIC INC
632.00
700.00SYSTEM REPAIR OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESEGAN COMPANIES INC
700.00
867.19WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESEHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC
867.19SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
867.19SOLID WASTE G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
867.18STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
3,468.75
215.13SEWER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEELECTRIC PUMP INC
215.13
89.38WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERSELFELT, JOHN
89.38
365.25ESCROWSBass Lake/EDI/UPENSR CORPORATION
365.25
1,110.14STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICEENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR
1,110.14
Meeting of October 6, 2008 (Item No. 4g)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 7
10/16/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:46:56R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
7Page -Council Check Summary
10/17/2008 -10/04/2008
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
1,215.88NETWORK SUPPORT SERVICES OFFICE EQUIPMENTEXECUTIVE OFFICE CONCEPTS LTD
1,215.88
66.28BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESFASTENAL COMPANY
162.59SEWER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES
228.87
34.93POLICE G & A POSTAGEFEDEX
20.71SEWER UTILITY G&A POSTAGE
55.64
576.75ICE RESURFACER MOTOR FUELSFERRELLGAS
576.75
87.23OPERATIONSSMALL TOOLSFIRE EQUIPMENT SPECIALTIES INC
87.23
37.03-GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTSFORMS & SYSTEMS OF MINNESOTA
599.28POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
7.45POLICE G & A POSTAGE
569.70
333.34ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL SERVICESFRANZEN & ASSOCIATES LLC
333.34
72.00GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIESGOLDEN VALLEY SUPPLY COMPANY
72.00
39.00CLERICALSEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTATGOLDEN VALLEY, CITY OF
39.00
125.00FINANCE G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTATGOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVICE
125.00
692.88EQUIPMENT REPLACE G&A MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENTGRAFIX SHOPPE
692.88
63.26GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE SMALL TOOLSGRAINGER INC, WW
92.36GENERAL CUSTODIAL DUTIES CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SUPPLY
253.95OFFICE EQUIP MTCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
Meeting of October 6, 2008 (Item No. 4g)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 8
10/16/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:46:56R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
8Page -Council Check Summary
10/17/2008 -10/04/2008
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
546.38WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER
955.95
932.50DAMAGE REPAIR OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESGRANITE LEDGE ELECTRICAL CONTR
932.50
260.20WEED CONTROL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESGREEN HORIZONS
260.20
81.96HALLOWEEN PARTY CONCESSION SUPPLIESGRIMSRUD, TOM
81.96
760.00OFFICE EQUIP MTCE GENERAL SUPPLIESHANS CUSTOM LAMINATE
760.00
7,436.25WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIESHAWKINS INC
3,863.82WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
11,300.07
96.00ADULT SOFTBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESHENDERSON, TRACY
96.00
719.07NETWORK SUPPORT SERVICES COMPUTER SERVICESHENNEPIN COUNTY INFO TECH
1,689.76POLICE G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
930.08OPERATIONSRADIO COMMUNICATIONS
315.04OPERATIONSEMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
3,653.95
8,000.00PARK MAINTENANCE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESHENNEPIN COUNTY SENTENCING TO
8,000.00
233.86PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICEHENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
233.86
1,287.50OPERATIONSGENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESHENNEPIN FACULTY ASSOCIATES
1,287.50
178.98WATER UTILITY G&A BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIESHIRSHFIELDS
178.98
936.00ADULT SOFTBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESHISLOP, DANIEL
Meeting of October 6, 2008 (Item No. 4g)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 9
10/16/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:46:56R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
9Page -Council Check Summary
10/17/2008 -10/04/2008
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
561.60-EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S WAGE GARNISHMENTS
374.40
244.87GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESHOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
108.80DAMAGE REPAIR OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
46.49BEAUTIFICATION / FLOWERS LANDSCAPING MATERIALS
400.16
24.84GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESHOME HARDWARE
42.53ERUOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
15.83ENGINEERING G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
209.96PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
9.66BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
12.63WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES
16.27WATER UTILITY G&A SMALL TOOLS
14.95SEWER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES
346.67
44.00KICKBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESHOWES, KRISTINE
336.00ADULT SOFTBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
380.00
50.97HUMAN RESOURCES RECOGNITIONHSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS
1,068.95INSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
29.98WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
34.47ADULTS 18 AND OLDER CONCESSION SUPPLIES
1,184.37
45.00VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSIATN
45.00
164.25WESTWOOD G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEIKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS
164.25
1,154.95CABLE TV G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESIMPLEX.NET INC
1,154.95
180.00PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSIMSA
180.00
319.77WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESINDELCO
319.77
Meeting of October 6, 2008 (Item No. 4g)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 10
10/16/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:46:56R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
10Page -Council Check Summary
10/17/2008 -10/04/2008
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
113.75ADMINISTRATION G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESIRON MOUNTAIN
56.03POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
169.78
130.87NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESJEWELL, JILL
130.87
2,892.35WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEJOHN HENRY FOSTER MN
2,892.35
73.92TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTATKEELER, TOBY
73.92
75.00SUMMER FIELDTRIPS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESKEHREN, ALISHA
75.00
33,509.48CONSTRUCTION PAYMENTS IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDILACHMANSINGH SALES INC, CARLO
33,509.48
824.05SYSTEM REPAIR OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESLARSON, JH CO
824.05
12,994.68UNINSURED LOSS G&A UNINSURED LOSSLEAGUE OF MN CITIES INSURANCE
12,994.68
3,325.95DAMAGE REPAIR OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESLIGHTING PLASTICS OF MN INC
3,325.95
204.70ORGANIZED REC G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CARLOMBARDI, JIM
204.70
1,520.00FRANCHISE ADMINISTRATION SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTATMACTA
1,520.00
1,786.01PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESMAGNUSON SOD/HAAG SERVICES INC
1,786.01
281.77SSD 1 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESMAPLE CREST LANDSCAPE
542.18SSD 2 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
568.62SSD 3 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1,392.57
Meeting of October 6, 2008 (Item No. 4g)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 11
10/16/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:46:56R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
11Page -Council Check Summary
10/17/2008 -10/04/2008
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
991.95ASSESSING G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESMARSHALL & SWIFT
991.95
293.41PATCHING TEMPORARY OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESMCCOY, WILLIAM PETROLEUM FUELS
60.71VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A MOTOR FUELS
354.12
96.18SYSTEM REPAIR OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESMENARDS
72.22WW RENTAL HOUSE (1322)OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
56.56HALLOWEEN PARTY GENERAL SUPPLIES
224.96
7,723.20WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICEMETRO LEAK DETECTION INC
7,723.20
76.95POLICE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIESMICRO CENTER
179.55WATER UTILITY G&A OFFICE EQUIPMENT
256.50
22,231.93SEALCOAT PREPARATION OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESMIDWEST ASPHALT CORP
2,072.35PATCHING-PERMANENT OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
395,644.43CONSTRUCTION PAYMENTS IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
310.95WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
420,259.66
468.00PAWN FEES OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESMINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPT
468.00
475.01EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S ACCRUED OTHER BENEFITSMINNESOTA BENEFIT ASSOC
475.01
1,991.84EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S WAGE GARNISHMENTSMINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PYT CT
1,991.84
712.32GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET CLEARING ACCOUNTMINNESOTA DEPT COMMERCE
712.32
250.00WATER UTILITY G&A LICENSESMINNESOTA DEPT OF HEALTH
250.00
Meeting of October 6, 2008 (Item No. 4g)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 12
10/16/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:46:56R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
12Page -Council Check Summary
10/17/2008 -10/04/2008
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
16.00EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S ACCRUED OTHER BENEFITSMINNESOTA NCPERS LIFE INS
16.00
35.00FINANCE G & A TRAININGMMUA
35.00
25.00OPERATIONSTRAININGMNSCU MRTC
25.00
750.00ESCROWSPMC ESCROWMOLINA, LARISSA
750.00
300.00ADULT SOFTBALL SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSMRPA
300.00
73.01GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT PARTSMTI DISTRIBUTING CO
73.01
113.50PRE-SCHOOL PROGRAMS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESNANCY'S CRAFT CAPERS
113.50
5.74H.V.A.C. EQUIP. MTCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIESNAPA (GENUINE PARTS CO)
41.39WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT PARTS
47.13
560.02EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A TUITIONNIELSEN, TAMMY
560.02
111.67SUPPORT SERVICES SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTATNORDRUM, ERIN
111.67
728.29GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT PARTSNORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC
728.29
149.76STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESO'CONNOR, CHARLES
149.76
55.80YOUTH PROGRAMS PROGRAM REVENUEO'DONNELL, SHEILA
55.80
141.19GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT PARTSO'REILLY AUTO PARTS
141.19
Meeting of October 6, 2008 (Item No. 4g)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 13
10/16/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:46:56R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
13Page -Council Check Summary
10/17/2008 -10/04/2008
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
500.00ANIMAL CONTROL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESOAK KNOLL ANIMAL HOSPITAL
500.00
484,785.00CONSTRUCTION PAYMENTS IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDIODLAND PROTECTIVE COATINGS INC
484,785.00
3,528.00GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESOERTEL ARCHITECTS
3,528.00
110.64ADMINISTRATION G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESOFFICE DEPOT
96.62HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICE SUPPLIES
250.94DESKTOP SUPPORT/SERVICES OFFICE EQUIPMENT
158.16POLICE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
45.16POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
16.16OPERATIONSOFFICE SUPPLIES
233.69INSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
49.02PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
179.08ORGANIZED REC G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
2.56PARK MAINTENANCE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
138.44WESTWOOD G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
2.56VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A OFFICE SUPPLIES
1,283.03
1,045.00INSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESOFFICE TEAM
1,045.00
96.00ADULT SOFTBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESOLUFSON, CURTIS
96.00
2,992.20PORTABLE TOILETS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESON SITE SANITATION
241.82NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
3,234.02
5.00YOUTH PROGRAMS PROGRAM REVENUEPARADA, LINETTE
5.00
196.53BEAUTIFICATION / FLOWERS PARK MAINTENANCEPARKER, KAREN
196.53
5,887.54BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIESPBBS EQUIPMENT CORP
Meeting of October 6, 2008 (Item No. 4g)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 14
10/16/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:46:56R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
14Page -Council Check Summary
10/17/2008 -10/04/2008
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
4,180.00BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICE
10,067.54
13,995.03COMM & MARKETING G & A PRINTING & PUBLISHINGPERNSTEINER CREATIVE GROUP INC
13,995.03
34.00YOUTH PROGRAMS PROGRAM REVENUEPIKE, ANGELA
34.00
30.00CLERICALSEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTATPLEAA
30.00
362.49PARK MAINTENANCE G & A TELEPHONEPOPP TELECOM
362.49
108.00ICE RESURFACER EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEPRINTERS SERVICE INC
108.00
2,132.30POLICE G & A POLICE EQUIPMENTPUBLIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO
2,132.30
6,825.00WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICEQUALITY RESTORATION SERVICES I
6,825.00
645.87FACILITY OPERATIONS TELEPHONEQWEST
55.41NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH TELEPHONE
110.82COP SHOP TELEPHONE
2,026.77COMMUNICATIONS/GV REIMBURSEABL TELEPHONE
18.18E-911 PROGRAM TELEPHONE
22.48REC CENTER BUILDING TELEPHONE
2,879.53
41.26HALLOWEEN PARTY GENERAL SUPPLIESRANDALL, SANDI
41.26
1,812.91FACILITY OPERATIONS GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICERANDY'S SANITATION INC
789.07REC CENTER BUILDING GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE
77.62WATER UTILITY G&A GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE
599.55SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE
3,279.15
Meeting of October 6, 2008 (Item No. 4g)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 15
10/16/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:46:56R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
15Page -Council Check Summary
10/17/2008 -10/04/2008
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
188.96WATER UTILITY G&A POSTAGERAPID GRAPHICS & MAILING
188.95SEWER UTILITY G&A POSTAGE
188.95SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS POSTAGE
188.95STORM WATER UTILITY G&A POSTAGE
755.81
80.00PUBLIC WORKS G & A MEETING EXPENSERARDIN, MICHAEL
80.00
132.72NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESRAYMOND, MIKE
132.72
4,344.36COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESREACH FOR RESOURCES INC
4,344.36
225.00MOVE-UP PROGRAM SERVICES/MRKTG OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESREHKAMP LARSON ARCHITECTS INC
225.00
721.63SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS OTHERREHRIG PACIFIC CO
721.63
253.19HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESRILEY, DETTMAN & KELSEY
253.19
187.20ORGANIZED REC G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CARROSA, NATE
187.20
5,000.00INSPECTIONS G & A PMC ESCROWROTTWEDER, GARY
5,000.00
137.79STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICESA-AG INC
137.79
225.00MOVE-UP PROGRAM SERVICES/MRKTG OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESSALA ARCHITECTS INC
225.00
255.00GRAFFITI CONTROL OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESSANI-MASTERS INC
255.00
850.00WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESSCHELLER TAPPING, LEE
850.00
Meeting of October 6, 2008 (Item No. 4g)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 16
10/16/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:46:56R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
16Page -Council Check Summary
10/17/2008 -10/04/2008
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
189.56SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESSCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO.
3,838.35PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
4,027.91
632.61PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESSCHOEBEN'S WINDOW CLEANING SER
716.23BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICE
1,348.84
143.02ASSESSING G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CARSCHOMER, KELLEY
143.02
70.00HOUSING REHAB G & A TRAININGSENSIBLE LAND USE COALITION
70.00
75.00SUMMER FIELDTRIPS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESSHANDLEY, BENJI
75.00
271.08PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESSHERWIN WILLIAMS
271.08
375.00HALLOWEEN PARTY OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESSIEFERT, JIM
375.00
3,702.30GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICESIMPLEXGRINNELL LP
3,702.30
42.76OPERATIONSOPERATIONAL SUPPLIESSMITH, CARY S
42.76
10,921.00WATER UTILITY G&A BUILDING MTCE SERVICESPEC7GROUP
10,921.00
2,202.53DESKTOP SUPPORT/SERVICES DATACOMMUNICATIONSSPRINT
2,202.53
235.00ARENA MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIESSPS COMPANIES INC
273.95PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
92.96WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
601.91
330.00SUMMER FIELDTRIPS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESST LOUIS PARK TRANSP INC
330.00
Meeting of October 6, 2008 (Item No. 4g)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 17
10/16/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:46:56R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
17Page -Council Check Summary
10/17/2008 -10/04/2008
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
25.00HUMAN RESOURCES SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTATST MICHAEL, CITY OF
25.00
229.98GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT PARTSSTREICHER'S
318.39EQUIPMENT REPLACE G&A MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENT
548.37
151.94ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL NOTICESSUN NEWSPAPERS
407.00COMMUNICATION & MARKETING BUDG OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
128.70OFFICE EQUIPMENT OFFICE FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT
687.64
2,920.83WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESSWANSON PROCESS SERVICES
2,920.83
168.48FINANCE G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CARSWANSON, BRIAN
168.48
700.00SOCCEROTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESSWANSON, JORDAN
700.00
129.38ADMINISTRATION G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESSYNERGY GRAPHICS INC
129.38
1,724.50IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESTALBERG LAWN & LANDSCAPE INC
818.99MOWINGOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
2,543.49
97.00BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICETERMINIX INT
97.00
8,100.00REILLY BUDGET OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESTESTAMERICA LABORATORIES INC
8,100.00
33.00OPERATIONSOPERATIONAL SUPPLIESTEXA TONKA TAILORING
33.00
662.50BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICETHYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR
662.50
Meeting of October 6, 2008 (Item No. 4g)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 18
10/16/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:46:56R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
18Page -Council Check Summary
10/17/2008 -10/04/2008
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
547.50ADMINISTRATION G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESTIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL
547.50
16,930.85ESCROWSDuke Construction-Mps West TSTKDA
16,930.85
29,670.98TREE DISEASE PRIVATE CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICETOP NOTCH TREE CARE
29,670.98
96.00ADULT SOFTBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESTRAUTMANN, JOHN
96.00
1,925.00DESKTOP SUPPORT/SERVICES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESTRESERA CONSULTING LLC
1,925.00
247.54NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESTRIANGLE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN
247.54
310.00H.V.A.C. EQUIP. MTCE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEUHL CO INC
310.00
515.27SUPPORT SERVICES OPERATIONAL SUPPLIESUNIFORMS UNLIMITED
100.23SUPERVISORYOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
337.81PATROLOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
50.48-OPERATIONS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
902.83
244.50EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S UNITED WAYUNITED WAY OF MINNEAPOLIS AREA
244.50
99.00TRAININGSEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTATUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA REGIST
99.00
220.00POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESUNO DOS TRES COMMUNICATIONS
220.00
67.60POLICE G & A TELEPHONEUSA MOBILITY WIRELESS INC
692.54OPERATIONSTELEPHONE
8.53WATER UTILITY G&A TELEPHONE
768.67
Meeting of October 6, 2008 (Item No. 4g)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 19
10/16/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:46:56R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
19Page -Council Check Summary
10/17/2008 -10/04/2008
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
865.00HUMAN RESOURCES RECOGNITIONVAIL, LORI
865.00
159.02OPERATIONSOPERATIONAL SUPPLIESVALLEY NATIONAL GASES WV LLC
8.02BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
167.04
114.08ENVIRONMENTAL G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CARVAUGHAN, JIM
114.08
20.00HUMAN RESOURCES RECRUITMENTVERIFIED CREDENTIALS
20.00
1,652.31VOICE SYSTEM MTCE TELEPHONEVERIZON WIRELESS
72.34COMMUNICATIONS/GV REIMBURSEABL TELEPHONE
1,724.65
65.00ENGINEERING G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESVIKING INDUSTRIAL CTR
65.00
4,500.00ESCROWSPMC ESCROWWALDEN, CRAIG
4,500.00
67,587.36SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICEWASTE MANAGEMENT
32,213.40SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS RECYCLING SERVICE
14,830.32SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS YARD WASTE SERVICE
28,546.36SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE
9,158.63SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL YARD WASTE SERVICE
152,336.07
436.60PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESWASTE TECHNOLOGY INC
436.60
634.98EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S STATE WITHHOLDINGWISCONSIN DEPT OF REVENUE
634.98
119,780.83WOLFE LAKE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESWOLFE LAKE ASSOCIATION
119,780.83
10,419.24FACILITY OPERATIONS ELECTRIC SERVICEXCEL ENERGY
141.70PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE ELECTRIC SERVICE
Meeting of October 6, 2008 (Item No. 4g)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 20
10/16/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:46:56R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
20Page -Council Check Summary
10/17/2008 -10/04/2008
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
448.12WESTWOOD G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE
17,325.22ENTERPRISE G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE
670.86WATER UTILITY G&A ELECTRIC SERVICE
192.01OPERATIONSELECTRIC SERVICE
118.67OPERATIONSELECTRIC SERVICE
29,315.82
480.79WIRELESS G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESXO COMMUNICATIONS
480.79
356.57PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIESZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
356.57PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
237.71SEWER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
950.85
Report Totals 1,688,307.23
Meeting of October 6, 2008 (Item No. 4g)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 21
Meeting Date: October 20, 2008
Agenda Item #: 4h
MINUTES
St. Louis Park Housing Authority
Hamilton House, Community Room
Wednesday, September 10, 2008
5:00 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioners Catherine Courtney, Steve Fillbrandt,
Renee Fitzgerald, Trinicia Hill, Judith Moore
STAFF PRESENT: Jane Klesk, Kevin Locke, Teresa Schlegel, Michele Schnitker
OTHERS PRESENT: Brian Swanson, Assistant Finance Director,
Steve Wischmann, Kern, DeWenter, Viere, Ltd.
1. Call to Order
The meeting was called to order at 5:04 p.m.
2. Approval of Minutes for July, 2008
The Board minutes of July16, 2008 were unanimously approved, with the following
amendment to paragraph 6.b.: Commissioner Moore moved to approve the current slate of
officers as presented: Chair, Catherine Courtney, Vice-Chair, Steve Fillbrandt, and Secretary,
Renee Fitzgerald.
3. Hearings – None
4. Reports and Committees – None
5. Unfinished Business – None
6. New Business
a. FYE 2008 Audit Presentation
Ms. Schnitker introduced Brian Swanson, Assistant Finance Director, and Steve
Wischmann, Kern, DeWenter, Viere, Ltd. Mr. Wischmann reviewed the
Management Letter and FYE 2008 Audit, stating that; overall, the Housing
Authority is in a solid financial position. Mr. Wischmann informed the Board of
two deficiencies in internal control involving insufficient control over the cash
receipting process, and insufficient control over the cash disbursement process in the
Section 8 Program. Ms. Schnitker distributed a handout explaining management’s
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 4h) Page 2
Subject: Housing Authority Minutes September 10, 2008
response to the deficiencies. The deficiencies did not result in any financial errors or
misstatements, and HA and Finance staff are exploring solutions to eliminate future
concerns. Mr. Swanson and Mr. Wischmann addressed further questions from the
Commissioners.
b. Approval of Authorized Signers for Depository Services, Resolution Nos. 574 and
575
Ms. Klesk explained that the Housing Authority’s bank, U.S. Bank, requires updated
resolutions when the Finance contact persons have changed. The new contact
persons will be Jill Maples, Senior Accounting Clerk, and Patricia Sulander,
Accountant. Commissioner Fillbrandt moved to approve Resolution No. 574,
Resolution of the Housing Authority of St. Louis Park for Depository Services, for
the Section 8 checking account. Commissioner Fitzgerald seconded the motion, and
the motion passed 5-0. Commissioner Fillbrandt then moved to approve Resolution
No. 575, Resolution of the Housing Authority of St. Louis Park for Depository
Services, for the Public Housing checking account. Commissioner Fitzgerald
seconded the motion, and the motion passed 5-0.
c. Approval of New Housing Choice Voucher Payment Standards
Ms. Schnitker provided background on the increased payment standards for two,
three, four and five-bedroom size units, and the establishment of a Single Room
Occupancy (SRO) payment standard equal to the FMR (Fair Market Rent).
Commissioner Fitzgerald moved to approve the revised Section 8 Housing Choice
Voucher Program Payment Standards effective November 1, 2008. Commissioner
Moore seconded the motion, and the motion passed 5-0.
d. Approval of the Perspectives AHIF Award, Resolution No. 576
Ms. Schnitker requested the Board’s support and approval of Hennepin County
Housing Redevelopment Authority (HCHRA) participation in the Perspectives, Inc.
rehabilitation of affordable supportive housing apartments located in St. Louis Park,
through an HCHRA $260,000 deferred loan from the 2007 Affordable Housing
Incentive Fund (AHIF). Commissioner Fitzgerald moved to approve, and
Commissioner Moore seconded Resolution No. 576, Resolution Approving the
Award of Affordable Housing Incentive Funds and the Participation of Hennepin
County Housing and Redevelopment Authority With Perspectives, Inc. The motion
passed 5-0.
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 4h) Page 3
Subject: Housing Authority Minutes September 10, 2008
7. Communications from Executive Director
a. Claims List August and September – 2008
b. Communications
1. Monthly Report August and September – 2008
2. Development Report
3. Draft Financial Statements
8. Other
9. Adjournment
Commissioner Moore moved to adjourn the meeting, and Commissioner Fillbrandt
seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0. The meeting was adjourned at 6:18 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
__________________________
Renee Fitzgerald, Secretary
Meeting Date: October 20, 2008
Agenda Item #: 4i
OFFICIAL MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
September 17, 2008--6:00 p.m.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MEMBERS PRESENT: Lynne Carper, Claudia Johnston-Madison, Dennis Morris, Richard
Person, Carl Robertson, Larry Shapiro
MEMBERS ABSENT: Robert Kramer
STAFF PRESENT: Meg McMonigal, Sean Walther, Nancy Sells
1. Call to Order – Roll Call
2. Approval of Minutes of September 3, 2008
Commissioner Johnston-Madison made a motion to recommend approval of the September
3, 2008 minutes.
Commissioner Carper seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 4-0-2
(Commissioners Morris and Shapiro abstained).
3. Hearings
4. Other Business
A. Minor Amendment to PUD for Grocery Store – The West End
Location: 1570 16th Street West
Applicant: AD West End LLC
Case No: 08-32-PUD
Sean Walther, Senior Planner, presented the staff report. He explained that Minor
Amendments generally need only City Council approval, but in this case, the PUD approval
also required Planning Commission review. The Planning Commission may make a
recommendation to the City Council by motion, but it is not required. Planning
Commission comments and discussion will be considered by staff and the applicant and
forwarded to the City Council.
Mr. Walther reviewed the project background, building facade and site.
David Bader, developer, introduced the development team.
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 4i) Page 2
Subject: Planning Commission Minutes September 17, 2008
J.R. Anderson, developer/retail partner, stated he was excited about the grocery use as part of
the project. The grocery use brings a new concept to the marketplace and distinguishes the
development from other lifestyle projects in the greater Minneapolis area. They tried to
enhance the store from an exterior perspective, taking into consideration that it still needed
to operate as a grocery store. Mr. Anderson said they had tried to enliven the space and
bring windows to a pedestrian level. They wanted to create a pedestrian experience and as a
result of that, Roundy’s had agreed to include a revolving door to the plaza and glass at the
corners.
Mike Schmidt, Roundy’s, spoke about how they develop their stores from the neighborhood
perspective. Demographics dictate the kind of store and the kind of presentation they want
to put forth. He stated this is an area for a higher level store. The produce department is the
signature part of the store, with 600-700 items. He further discussed the store details and
services.
Commissioner Carper stated he was disappointed in the façade, especially the façade facing
Park Place Blvd. He said it was a very long length of brick and was very undifferentiated and
looked boring. The façade design would not encourage pedestrians to walk along the street.
He suggested tiles, murals, a water wall, stained glass windows, art or something regarding
the history of St. Louis Park. The windows seemed like the windows at Trader Joe’s, which
he didn’t think was ideal. The windows are boring. He said he thought there is a lot of
opportunity to do things differently. The front of the store could have displays or some
shelter. He went on to say there is an opportunity to look at this again and do something
spectacular rather than using more mundane brick.
Pat Mascia, development team, replied those were all opportunities. He said when they
spoken with staff, some of the issues were clear glass and being able to look through. There
are a lot of possibilities in terms of the panels. Glass has been added where possible. They
had shown renderings of the art on 16th and it could be something reflecting St. Louis Park
and the theme of the development. It is the back of the store. They have to make Park Place
as inviting as possible. It was a great opportunity for art. The renderings were just an
example and it was something they could develop with staff as they move forward.
Chair Robertson spoke about Park Place façade elements which include brick, stone, and
awnings. He stated that is where the stairways are located. He noted there are some playful
elements and it is a big facade.
Mr. Mascia stated the elevation presented a challenge.
Chair Robertson asked if there was an opportunity to have a raised terrace or balcony.
Mr. Mascia replied they were exploring everything they could.
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 4i) Page 3
Subject: Planning Commission Minutes September 17, 2008
Commissioner Morris noted he didn’t see cart corrals and bicycle racks.
Mr. Walther responded that eight cart corrals were planned for the site. They will be curbed
and guttered and separated from nearby parking stalls. They are awaiting the plan including
those items.
Mr. Mascia added there are bicycle racks in the master plan at the grocery site and building
12.
Commissioner Morris envisioned an issue with traffic circulation on the site such as exists at
Home Depot and Costco. He commented there would be a bottleneck where all traffic
would enter and exit on 16th. It seemed constraining. He spoke about the reduction in the
parking requirement and looking at the traffic movement, especially with another building
on site, he envisioned a log jam in the short corridor that services the whole parking lot.
Mr. Walther responded the parking lot was reviewed during the preliminary and final PUD
approval. There were concerns and the developer made adjustments. There are
opportunities for occasional back ups during peak hours.
Commissioner Morris commented specifically at building 12, the parking is stacked into the
main exit aisle and he envisioned problems with people backing out of those stalls. It
appeared to be 12 ½ feet for an interior drive lane.
Mr. Mascia responded all drive lanes were 24 feet. It is a standard parking bay. He stated
there are other entrances.
Chair Robertson asked about exiting to the north across the development.
Mr. Mascia replied that exit was in place. Duke Drive and a service drive are also public
drives where people could exit.
Mr. Walther continued with the staff report and spoke about exterior materials and
landscaping. He said as this is a visible and important project staff wanted to bring it to the
Commission for general comments and reactions.
Chair Robertson stated it was a difficult building type. Architects don’t like to do back ends
of buildings. He said the proposal is better than anything else in town of this nature as far as
not having a backside and he thought it worked. He said he felt the parking is a little tight,
but there was enough exiting. Overall he stated that he liked the project.
Commissioner Morris commented that the plan was good and better than what is normally
seen on commercial development, but there could be some tweaking. He said he thought
some of the elements could be better, especially the displays proposed along the backside of
the wall. He suggested interactive features and more space for art. He would like to see a fall
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 4i) Page 4
Subject: Planning Commission Minutes September 17, 2008
back plan should the parking not work, that they have something contingent to control
interior traffic, and possibly predominantly mark the northerly exit. Cart corrals and specific
bike rack locations also need to be in the plan. He suggested vendor carts could be added, as
long as they were done in a nice format.
Commissioner Johnson-Madison believed the project was well done, but could be tweaked as
discussed. The parking would be similar to what they encounter in other areas and drivers
learn to be careful in those settings.
Commissioner Carper said he was disappointed with the plans. They had differentiated the
sides of the building, but it was not particularly inspired. He said there was a lot of
opportunity to improve on this and be more creative. This is a spectacular development.
There are some TIF funds involved and the City deserves something special and he didn’t
think it would add that much to the cost of the building. They would be replacing
expensive brick with some other types of materials that would do the job as well. He liked it
and it was acceptable, but it could be really moved to an “A” level if a few changes were
made.
Chair Robertson agreed he would like to see things a little improved and he would like to see
public art. When there is TIF involved, a little return on the investment is expected. He
said he had to respect that businesses have the right to promote themselves. They want to be
wildly successful and part of that is promoting what they do and how well they do it and the
Commission couldn’t lose site of that.
Commissioner Shapiro stated this is a grocery store building and he had never seen a grocery
store building that included all of the elements of this proposal. They could ask for a lot
more, but he said he thought this was already a lot more than is typical and he liked it.
5. Communications
6. Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned 6:50 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Amy Stegora-Peterson
Recording Secretary
Meeting Date: October 20, 2008
Agenda Item #: 6a
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Ordinance for Vacation of a Portion of a Drainage and Utility Easement at 4210 28th Street West.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Mayor to close public hearing. Motion to Approve First Reading of Ordinance approving the
vacation of a portion of a drainage and utility easement at 4210 28th Street West, contingent upon
the applicant providing a replacement easement, and setting the second reading of the proposed
ordinance for November 3rd, 2008.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Is there a need for the drainage and utility easement proposed to be vacated? The easement exists
because of an isolated drainage basin just west of the existing lot. The easement is currently used;
however, dedication of a new easement and grading changes will make it unnecessary.
BACKGROUND:
The parcel under consideration is located at 4210 28th Street West in the Fern Hill Neighborhood.
As an existing parcel, the site is suited primarily to the future construction of one single family
home. Despite its size of over 14,000 square feet, construction on the lot will be challenging. To
the west of the lot is a large, isolated drainage area. The drainage area has no outlet; for this reason,
during major rain events the water level in the drainage area sometimes rises quite substantially.
Though the site is outside of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) recognized 100-
year floodplain, the City Engineer has determined that the drainage area is considered a “flood area,”
susceptible to occasional flooding. A map is attached showing the maximum extent of this “flood
area.”
The parcel is what is sometimes known as a “through-lot,” meaning that it has frontage on two
streets. When the lot was platted, drainage and utility easements were placed along the perimeter of
the lot as is typical of most lots in St. Louis Park. However, a large drainage and utility easement
was also placed across the middle of the lot. In the opinion of the property owner, the location of
this easement makes future construction impractical. It is for this reason that a vacation is requested.
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 6a) Page 2
Subject: Ordinance for Vacation of a Portion of a Drainage and Utility Easement at 4210 28th Street West
The City Engineer has reviewed the requested vacation and has determined that it is appropriate so
long as a new drainage and utility easement is provided. The new drainage and utility easement
could be reconfigured to better match the “flood area,” enabling construction on the lot while
maintaining a drainage pattern similar to what occurs on the site during major events now. The new
drainage and utility easement must ensure that no construction or fill of the lot occurs at an
elevation below 877 feet above sea level. Before the vacation is filed with the County, a new
easement would need to be filed meeting these conditions.
Planning Staff has reviewed the proposal and determined that with the new easement, construction
of a single family house will be possible without the need for variances. The applicant should be able
to build a home that is out of the drainage and utility easements while meeting all setback and
dimensional requirements of the Zoning Ordinance.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
None.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
The vacation of this drainage and utility easement will enable the construction of one new single
family home in an existing neighborhood. A new single family home meets the vision goal to
construct ‘move-up’ housing within St. Louis Park’s neighborhoods.
Attachments: Ordinance - Vacation
Location Map
Site Plans and related documents
Prepared by: Adam Fulton, Planner
Reviewed by: Meg McMonigal, Planning and Zoning Supervisor
Kevin Locke. Community Development Director
Approved by: Nancy Gohman, Deputy City Manager/HR Director
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 6a) Page 3
Subject: Ordinance for Vacation of a Portion of a Drainage and Utility Easement at 4210 28th Street West
ORDINANCE NO.____-08
AN ORDINANCE VACATING DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT
4210 28TH STREET WEST
THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK DOES ORDAIN:
Section 1. A petition in writing signed by a majority of all of the owners of all property
abutting upon both sides of the drainage and utility easement proposed to be vacated has been duly
filed. The notice of said petition has been published in the St. Louis Park Sailor on October 9, 2008
and the City Council has conducted a public hearing upon said petition and has determined that the
easement is not needed for public purposes, and that it is for the best interest of the public that said
easement be vacated.
Section 2. The following described easement as now dedicated and laid out within the
corporate limits of the City of St. Louis Park, is vacated:
That particular utility and drainage easement, originally dedicated in the recorded plat of
Silverberg Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and now to be vacated which lies 20.00
feet southerly of a line described as follows:
Commencing at the northeast corner of Lot 2, Block 1, said plat; thence southerly
along the east line of said Lot 2 a distance of 50.00 feet to the point of beginning of
the line to be described; thence deflecting to the right 89 degrees 23 minutes 55
seconds a distance of 86.90 feet to the west line of said Lot 2, and said line there
terminating.
EXCEPT that part lying westerly of a line described as follows:
Commencing at the northeast corner of Lot 3, Block 1, said plat; thence southerly
along the east line of said Lot 3 a distance of 25.00 feet to the point of beginning of
the line to be described; thence deflecting left 148 degrees 20 minutes 58 seconds a
distance of 59.65 feet to the previously described line, and said line there
terminating.
ALSO EXCEPT the east 6.00 feet thereof.
reserving, however, to the City of St. Louis Park any and all easements that may exist in, over, and
across the described property for storm sewer, sanitary sewer, water main, and public utility
purposes.
Section 3. The City Clerk is instructed to record certified copies of this ordinance in the
Office of the Hennepin County Register of Deeds or Registrar of Titles as the case may be.
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 6a) Page 4
Subject: Ordinance for Vacation of a Portion of a Drainage and Utility Easement at 4210 28th Street West
Sec.4. This Ordinance shall take effect fifteen days after its publication.
Adopted by the City Council
Reviewed for Administration
City Manager Mayor
Attest: Approved as to Form and Execution:
City Clerk City Attorney
28TH ST W
CEDAR S
T
INGLEWOOD AVE SJOPPA AVE SJOPPA AVE S4210 28th Street West - SilverbergDrainage and Utility Easement Vacation
$
October 15, 2008
3
X
Zoning Classification
R1 - Single Family Residential
R2 - Single Family Residential
R3 - Two Family Residential
R4 - Multi-Familiy Residential
RC - Multi-Family Residential
POS - Parks and Open Space
MX - Mixed-Use
C1 - Neighborhood Commercial
C2 - General Commercial
O - Office
IP - Industrial Park
IG - General Industrial
100 Feet
R-1
R-1 R-1
R-1
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 6a)
Subject: Ordinance for Vacation of a Portion of a Drainage and Utility Easement at 4210 28th Street West Page 5
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 6a)
Subject: Ordinance for Vacation of a Portion of a Drainage and Utility Easement at 4210 28th Street West Page 6
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 6a)
Subject: Ordinance for Vacation of a Portion of a Drainage and Utility Easement at 4210 28th Street West Page 7
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 6a)
Subject: Ordinance for Vacation of a Portion of a Drainage and Utility Easement at 4210 28th Street West Page 8
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 6a)
Subject: Ordinance for Vacation of a Portion of a Drainage and Utility Easement at 4210 28th Street West Page 9
Meeting Date: October 20, 2008
Agenda Item #: 6b
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Public Hearing for Assessment of Delinquent Utilities, Tree Removal/Injection, False Alarms and
Other Miscellaneous Charges.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Mayor to close the public hearing. Motion to Adopt Resolution Assessing Delinquent Water,
Sewer, Storm Sewer, Refuse and Other Fees and Charges.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
City Council should determine if the fees are properly assessed against the properties that benefitted
from city services.
BACKGROUND:
After conducting a public hearing, the City Council is authorized to direct the assessment of
delinquent utility accounts, tree removal/injection, false alarm fees, and other miscellaneous charges
against the benefiting property.
Accounts remaining delinquent and unpaid at the close of business on October 31, 2008 will be sent
to Hennepin County for inclusion with the 2009 property tax bill. This process follows essentially
the same schedule each year and is developed to meet Hennepin County’s deadline of December 1,
2008 for submission of the assessment rolls.
PROCESS PRIOR TO HEARING:
Each of the customers received a City service. Subsequently, the customers were then billed through
our regular billing process. The invoice(s) is/are now past due, so the recommended method of
collecting the past due amounts are through certification to the property taxes for next year. In
advance of the public hearing date, individual letters are mailed to property owners, and tenants if
applicable, advising them of the assessment and their right to be heard before the City Council.
This year, 1,842 letters were sent to customers, as compared to over 1,700 letters last year. Balances
past due as of September 19, 2008 are considered delinquent. The total amount delinquent at that
time was $674,705 compared to $722,532 in 2007. Each year, we have a number of residents who
pay their delinquent amount before the certification deadline, thus reducing the final amount that is
certified and sent to the County. In addition, there are several hundred property owners who
contact the City with questions about their outstanding balance(s), the certification process and/or
payment arrangements during October.
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 6b) Page 2
Subject: Public Hearing for Assessment of Delinquent Utilities, Tree Removal/Injection, False Alarms and Other
Miscellaneous Charges
As of October 14, 2008 the City has delinquencies totaling $515,739. Customers have until
October 31, 2008 to pay the outstanding amount or contact the City to make payment
arrangements. The amounts shown do not include interest or the $25.00 per account administrative
fee which are added per our special assessment policy adopted in Resolution 00-078. A copy of the
assessment roll is on file with the City Clerk’s office for review.
At this time, the Finance Department has not received notice that anyone wants to speak at the
Public Hearing.
NEXT STEPS:
Staff will continue to collect payments related to the delinquent accounts and work with residents to
resolve issues related to their delinquent accounts. All delinquent accounts outstanding as of
October 31, 2008 will be certified to Hennepin County for collection. After certification, the
delinquent amounts will become a lien on the individual properties.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
Collection of these charges is vital to the financial stability of our utility systems and to reimburse
the city for expenses incurred in providing services.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Not Applicable
Attachments: Resident Letter
Resolution
Assessment Roll (On File with City Clerk)
Prepared by: Brian A. Swanson, Assistant Finance Director
Reviewed by: Bruce DeJong, Finance Director
Approved by: Nancy Gohman, Deputy City Manager/HR Director
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 6b) Page 3
Subject: Public Hearing for Assessment of Delinquent Utilities, Tree Removal/Injection, False Alarms and Other
Miscellaneous Charges
Date of Notice: October 1, 2008
Property Owner 1
Mailing Address
Mailing City, Mailing State, Mailing Zip
RE: Invoice Number:
Customer:
Service Address:
Delinquent Amount:
Description:
Dear Property Owner 1:
The City of St. Louis Park encourages its customers to remain current in the payment of their bills.
When accounts become delinquent, they may be certified to Hennepin County to be collected with
property taxes.
According to our records, your account is delinquent. This letter serves as notice that any
delinquent amounts not received at City Hall by 4:30 p.m. October 31st, 2008 will be sent to the
County for collection with your property taxes in 2008. If the delinquent amount is forwarded for
collection, you will also incur an additional $25.00 service charge, plus 5.85% interest.
The City Council will consider final action on all delinquent accounts at a public hearing during the
regular Council meeting on October 20, 2008 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 5005
Minnetonka Blvd. A written appeal may be presented to the Council at that time. Appeals may also
be made to the Finance Director, 5005 Minnetonka Blvd., St. Louis Park, MN 55416.
We sincerely hope that you choose to make your delinquent payment in a timely manner. It is in
the best interest of the City of St. Louis Park and its property owners to avoid the special assessment
process. Please feel free to contact our office at (952) 924-2680 if you have questions regarding this
notice.
Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter.
Bruce DeJong
Finance Director
City of St. Louis Park
5005 Minnetonka Boulevard
St. Louis Park, MN 55416
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 6b) Page 4
Subject: Public Hearing for Assessment of Delinquent Utilities, Tree Removal/Injection, False Alarms and Other
Miscellaneous Charges
RESOLUTION NO. 08-____
LEVYING ASSESSMENT AND REASSESSMENT FOR DELINQUENT UTILITY
ACCOUNTS, TREE REMOVAL/INJECTION, FALSE ALARM FEES AND OTHER
MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES
WHEREAS, the City Council has heretofore determined by ordinance the rates and charges
for water, sewer, storm water and refuse services of the city and has provided for the abatement of tree
removal/injection, grass/weed cutting and other miscellaneous charges to a home or business shall be
at the expense of the owners of the premises involved; and
WHEREAS, all such sums become delinquent and assessable against the property served
under Section 6-158, Section 6-206, Section 9-103, Section 9-110, Section 11-2004 of the St. Louis
Park Ordinance Code and Minnesota Statutes 18.023, 18.271, 443 and 429; and
WHEREAS, the City Clerk has prepared an assessment roll setting forth an assessment
against each tract or parcel of land served by water, sewer, storm water and refuse services of the City
or charged for the costs of abating grass/weed cutting, tree removal/injection, false alarm fees and other
miscellaneous charges which remain unpaid at the close of business on October 31, 2008; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis
Park that said assessment roll is hereby adopted and approved, and there is hereby levied and assessed
or reassessed against each and every tract of land described therein an assessment in the amounts
respectively therein abating water, sewer, storm water , refuse, grass/weed cutting, tree
removal/injection, false alarm fees and other miscellaneous charges which remain unpaid at the close
of business on October 31, 2008; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized to deliver said
assessment or reassessment roll to the Auditor of Hennepin County for collection of the assessment in
the same manner as other municipal taxes are collected and payment thereof enforced with interest
from the date of this resolution at the rate of five point eight five percent (5.85 %) per annum.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council October 20, 2008
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Meeting Date: October 20, 2008
Agenda Item #: 6c
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
2009 Budget and Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 1.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Close Public Hearing. Motion to Approve Resolution setting the 2009 Budget and Property Owner
Service Charge for Special Service District No. 1 and directing staff to certify the annual service
charges to Hennepin County.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Does the City Council wish to approve SSD#1 budget and property owner service charge?
BACKGROUND:
On November 6, 2006, the City Council approved a resolution imposing a multi-year service charge
for Special Service District No. 1 (this district is located along Excelsior Blvd from Quentin Ave to
Hwy 100 and along Park Center Blvd and Monterey Drive). Annually, the City Council must set a
service charge for the District following a public hearing on the proposed charge. The Special
Service District Advisory Board approved the proposed 2009 budget and service charges by ballot
following their September 12, 2008 meeting. The notice of public hearing was published in the Sun
Sailor on October 2 and October 9, 2008. The public hearing notice was sent to all property owners
within the District more than ten (10) days prior to the public hearing.
Special Service District No. 1 Financial Position: As of October 1, 2008 Special Service District
No. 1 had an anticipated year-end fund balance of approximately $ 74,804 Staff and the Advisory
Board have agreed that the operating reserve should be maintained at a level of at least 50% of the
annual operating budget.
Maximum Budget / Service Charge Restriction Parameters: The budget and service charge/
special assessment do not have to be the same dollar amount since excess operating reserves may be
used in some years. By ordinance, the maximum budget increase cannot exceed the previous year’s
authorized budget amount by more than the Consumer Price Index (CPI) increase, up to a
maximum of 5%. This adjustment is based upon the applicable CPI percentage increase for the
Minneapolis/St. Paul metropolitan area.
Proposed 2009 Budget and Service Charges: The Advisory Board recommended approval of the
following:
• 2009 budget amount of $126,592, same as 2008; and
• 2009 service charge amount of $126,592, an increase of $63,296 from 2008.
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 6c) Page 2
Subject: 2009 Budget and Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District #1
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
The Facilities Maintenance Division incurs service charges within this district for the property
located at 3700 Monterey Drive (Recreation Center/Wolfe Park). The proposed service charge for
2009 is $32,674.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
Attachments: 2009 Proposed Budget
Resolution with Attachment A 2009 Proposed Service Charges
Prepared by: Ann Boettcher, Administrative Supervisor
Reviewed by: Brian Hoffman, Director of Inspections
Approved by: Nancy Gohman, Deputy City Manager/HR Director
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 6c) Page 3
Subject: 2009 Budget and Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District #1
CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK
Special Service District No. 1
2009 Budget
No.
Item
2008 Revised
Budget
2009
Proposed
Budget
6212 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,200 1,200
6224 LANDSCAPING MATERIALS 9,000 9,000
6223.650 BANNER REPLACEMENT 4,680 0
6410 GENERAL PROFFESSIONAL
SERVICES
29 29
6410.678 SSD Mgmt Services 4,500 4,500
6630.772 SSD – Snow Removal 54,000 56,193
6630.773 SSD - Site Maintenance 5,660 5,660
6630.774 SSD – Banner Install/Removal 0 2,500
6630.775 SSD – Irrigation Service 5,000 5,000
6630.776 SSD – Decorative Install 7,500 7,500
6630.777 SSD – Landscape Service 28,500 28,500
6950 LEGAL NOTICES 110 110
7106 PUBLIC LIABILITY INSURANCE 413 400
7207.880 SSD Infrastructure Repair 4,000 4,000
7301.890 SSD Pedestrian 2,000 2,000
7302 GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE 0 0
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 126,412 126,592
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 6c) Page 4
Subject: 2009 Budget and Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District #1
RESOLUTION NO. 08-____
RESOLUTION APPROVING 2009 BUDGET
AND SERVICE CHARGES FOR
SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT No. 1
WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance No. 2067-96, the City Council created Special Service
District No. 1 (the “District”) . The specific properties located within the District are identified on
Exhibit “A” attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 06-167, the City Council is authorized to impose
service charges within the District on a multi-year basis through and including the year 2009 for
taxes payable in said year; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 2.04 of Resolution No. 06-167, the maximum budget to
be imposed in any year will be subject to adjustment calculations based on Consumer Price Index
(CPI) data for the Minneapolis/St. Paul Metropolitan Area; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 3 of Resolution No. 06-167, the Service Charges shall be
payable and collected at the same time and in the same manner as provided for payment and
collection of ad valorem taxes; and
WHEREAS, the City is required by Statute to certify assessments to the County by
November 28, 2008.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis
Park as follows:
1. The 2009 Budget for Special Service District No. 1 of $126,592 is hereby approved
as recommended by the Special Service District No. 1 Advisory Board.
2. The authorized 2009 Service Charge for Special Service District No. 1 is $126,592
in the amounts and against the properties specified on Attachment “A” to this Resolution.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council October 20, 2008
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Meeting Date: October 20, 2008
Agenda Item #: 6d
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
2009 Budget and Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 2 and the
extension of the Special Service District No. 2 through 2018.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Close Public Hearing. Motion to Approve Resolution setting the 2009 Budget and Property Owner
Service Charge for Special Service District No. 2 and directing staff to certify the annual service
charges to Hennepin County.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Does the City Council wish to approve SSD#2 budget and property owner service charge?
BACKGROUND:
On December 1, 1997, the City Council approved a resolution imposing a service charge for Special
Service District No. 2 (this district is located along Excelsior Blvd. from Monterey Drive/38th St. to
France Ave.). Annually, the City Council must set a service charge for the District following a
public hearing on the proposed charge. The Special Service District Advisory Board approved the
proposed 2009 budget and service charges by ballot following their September 12, 2008 meeting.
The notice of public hearing was published in the Sun Sailor on October 2 and October 9, 2007.
The public hearing notice was sent to all property owners within the District more than ten (10)
days prior to the public hearing.
Special Service District No. 2 Extension: The District’s 1998 multi-year service charge was for
ten years expiring in 2008. Service District members have shown interest in extending the District
beyond 2008. Staff sent a petition to each property owner to approve service charges commencing
2008 through and including 2018. As required by law, the city has received signed petitions from
the owners of at least twenty-five percent (25%) or more of the land area of property and twenty-five
percent (25%) or more of the net tax capacity that would be subject to the service charge.
Special Service District No. 2 Financial Position: As of October 1, 2008 Special Service District
No. 2 had an anticipated year-end fund balance of approximately $ 1,306. Staff and the Advisory
Board have agreed that the operating reserve should be maintained at a level of at least 50% of the
annual operating budget and thus the 2009 Budget has been increased 5% to work towards
increasing the reserve.
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 6d) Page 2
Subject: 2009 Budget and Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 2 and the extension of the
Special Service District No. 2 through 2018
Maximum Budget / Service Charge Restriction Parameters: The budget and service charge/
special assessment do not have to be the same dollar amount since excess operating reserves may be
used in some years. By ordinance, the maximum budget increase cannot exceed the previous year’s
authorized budget amount by more than the Consumer Price Index (CPI) increase, up to a
maximum of 5%. This adjustment is based upon the applicable CPI percentage increase for the
Minneapolis/St. Paul metropolitan area.
Proposed 2009 Budget and Service Charges: The Advisory Board recommended approval of the
following:
• 2009 budget amount of $42,240, an increase of $1991 from 2008; and
• 2009 service charge amount of $42,240, an increase of $1991 from 2008.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
The Facilities Division incurs service charges for the City owned property, within this service
district, for the bus shelter located at 3929 Excelsior Blvd. The proposed fee for 2009 is $56.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
Attachments: 2009 Proposed Budget
Resolution with Attachment A -- 2009 Proposed Service Charges
Prepared by: Ann Boettcher, Administrative Supervisor
Reviewed by: Brian Hoffman, Director of Inspections
Approved by: Nancy Gohman, Deputy City Manager/HR Director
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 6d) Page 3
Subject: 2009 Budget and Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 2 and the extension of the
Special Service District No. 2 through 2018
CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK
Special Service District No. 2
2009 Budget
No.
Item
2008 Revised
Budget
2009
Proposed
Budget
6212 GENERAL SUPPLIES 200 200
6224 LANDSCAPING MATERIALS 3,500 3,500
6223.650 BANNER REPLACEMENT 3,720 0
6410 GENERAL PROFFESSIONAL
SERVICES
50 50
6410.678 SSD Mgmt Services 2,000 2,000
6630.772 SSD – Snow Removal 0 0
6630.773 SSD - Site Maintenance 800 2,800
6630.774 SSD – Banner Install/Removal 0 1,000
6630.775 SSD – Irrigation Service 2,800 2,800
6630.776 SSD – Decorative Install 5,700 5,700
6630.777 SSD – Landscape Service 17,500 18,200
6950 LEGAL NOTICES 110 110
7106 PUBLIC LIABILITY INSURANCE 119 130
7207.880 SSD Infrastructure Repair 2,000 4,000
7301.890 SSD Pedestrian 1,750 1,750
7302 GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE 0 0
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 40,249 42,240
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 6d) Page 4
Subject: 2009 Budget and Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 2 and the extension of the
Special Service District No. 2 through 2018
RESOLUTION NO. 08-____
RESOLUTION APPROVING 2009 BUDGET
AND SERVICE CHARGES FOR
SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT NO. 2
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, as follows:
Section 1. Recitals: Findings.
1.01 In 1998, pursuant to Ordinance No. 2093-97, the City created a special service district
for certain property located adjacent to Excelsior Boulevard within an area approximately bounded by
France Avenue westerly to Monterey Drive The specific properties included within this area are
identified on Exhibit “A” attached hereto and generally depicted on Exhibit “B” hereto and the right-
of-way adjacent thereto (the “District”). The City by Resolution 97-165 also adopted a multi-year
service charge through and including the year 2008.
1.02 The City has received a petition to impose a new multi-year service charge for 2009
and through and including the year 2018 from the owners of property within the District (the
"Petition").
1.03 The City Council has determined each of the following:
(a) the owners of at least twenty-five percent (25%) or more of the land area
within the District have signed the Petition;
(b) at least twenty-five percent (25%) of the individuals or business organizations
subject to the proposed service charge have signed the Petition;
(c) only owners of property located within the District have signed the Petition;
(d) only owners of property classified under Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.13 as
commercial, industrial, or public utility purposes, or that is vacant land zoned
or designated on a land use plan for commercial, industrial, or public utility
purposes, have signed the Petition; and
(e) notice of a public hearing has been given and a public hearing has been held.
Section 2. Adoption of 2009 Budget
2.01 2009 Budget. The 2009 Budget for Special Service District No. 2 of $42,240 is
hereby approved as recommended by the Special Service District No. 2 Advisory Board.
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 6d) Page 5
Subject: 2009 Budget and Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 2 and the extension of the
Special Service District No. 2 through 2018
2.02 Authorized 2009 Service Charge. The authorized 2009 Service Charge for Special
Service District No. 2 is $42,240 in the amounts and against the properties specified on Attachment
“A” attached to this Resolution.
Section 3. Imposition of Service Charge.
3.01 Amount of Service Charge. There is hereby imposed a service charge in the amounts
and against the properties specified on Exhibit "C" attached hereto (the "Service Charge").
3.02 Multi-year Service Charge. The Service Charge imposed by this resolution is a charge
for more than one year. The Service Charge will remain in effect through and including the year 2016
for taxes payable in said year. Exhibit "C" specifies the maximum cost of any improvement to be paid
for in whole or in part by the Service Charge, if any; the maximum cost of operating and maintaining
the improvements during the first year and upon completion of the improvements; the proposed
method and source of financing the improvements; and the maximum cost of operating and
maintaining the improvements. The maximum service charge imposed in any year will be adjusted as
provided in Section 3.04.
3.03 Calculation of Service Charge. The Service Charge for services related to the removal
of snow and ice shall be distributed based upon the front feet of sidewalk for each parcel in the
District. The Service Charge for all other costs shall be distributed based upon the area (square feet) of
each parcel within the District and subject to the Service Charge.
3.04 Inflation Adjuster. The maximum service charge to be imposed in any year (the
"Current Year") will increase from the maximum authorized budgeted amount for the year
immediately preceding the Current Year (the "Prior Year") based upon the following:
The Consumer Price Index (All Items) for the Minneapolis/St. Paul Metropolitan
Area, published by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics
("Index"), which is published for the date nearest the commencement of the Current
Year (the "Current Year Index"), shall be compared with the Index published for the
date nearest the commencement of the Prior Year (the "Prior Year Index"). If the
Current Year Index has increased over the Prior Year Index, the Service Charge shall be
increased by multiplying the Service Charge by a fraction, the numerator of which is
the Current Year Index and the denominator of which is the Prior Year Index. If the
Index is discontinued or revised, such other government index or computation with
which it is replaced shall be used in order to obtain substantially the same result as
would be obtained if the Index had not been discontinued or revised.
Notwithstanding increases in the Index of greater than five percent (5%), the Service
Charge shall not increase from any Prior Year to any Current Year by an amount
greater than five percent (5%) of the Prior Year's Service Charge.
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 6d) Page 6
Subject: 2009 Budget and Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 2 and the extension of the
Special Service District No. 2 through 2018
3.05 Distribution of Total Service Charge. The distribution of the total Service Charge
among properties within the District and subject to the Service Charge may vary and shall be
recalculated pursuant to the formula specified in Section 3.03 if and to the extent that: (i) the front
footage of sidewalks constructed on such properties increases or decreases; or (ii) a parcel increases or
decreases in size by acquisition or sale.
Section 4. Collection of Service Charges.
4.01 Collection. The Services Charges shall be payable and collected at the same time and
in the same manner as provided for payment and collection of ad valorem taxes. For purposes of
determining the appropriate tax rate, taxable property or net tax capacity shall be determined without
regard to captured or original net tax capacity under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177 or to the
distribution or contribution value under Minnesota Statutes, Section 473F.08.
4.02 Penalty and Interest. Service Charges made payable in the same manner as provided
for payment and collection of ad valorem taxes, if not paid on or before the applicable due date, shall
be subject to the same penalty and interest as in the case of ad valorem tax amounts not paid by the
respective date.
4.03 Due Date. The due date for the Service Charge payable in the same manner as ad
valorem taxes is the due date given in law for the real or personal property tax for the property on
which the service charge is imposed. Service Charges imposed on net tax capacity which are to become
payable in the following year must be certified to the County Auditor by the date provided in
Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.061, Subd. 3 for annual certification of special assessment
installments.
Section 5. Revenue Surplus. To the extent that the total of Service Charges collected
exceed the cost of services rendered within the District, at the election of the City, either: (i) such
excess amount shall be held as a reserve to pay the cost of future services provided under this
resolution; or (ii) the next year's levy of taxes and service charges shall be decreased by a corresponding
amount.
Section 6. Recording. The City may record this Resolution against parcels located
within the District and subject to the Service Charge for the purpose of providing notice of the Service
Charge to prospective purchasers of such parcels.
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 6d) Page 7
Subject: 2009 Budget and Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 2 and the extension of the
Special Service District No. 2 through 2018
Section 7. Effective Date. This Resolution shall be effective on the forty-fifth (45th) day
following adoption, which effective date shall be December 4, 2008.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council October 20, 2008
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 6d) Subject: 2009 Budget and Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 2Page 8
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 6d)
Subject: 2009 Budget and Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 2 Page 9
Meeting Date: October 20, 2008
Agenda Item #: 6e
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
2009 Budget and Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 3
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Close Public Hearing. Motion to approve resolution setting the 2009 Budget and Property Owner
Service Charge for Special Service District No. 3 and directing staff to certify the annual service
charges to Hennepin County.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Does the City Council wish to approve SSD#3 budget and property owner service charge?
BACKGROUND:
On April 15, 2002, the City Council approved a resolution imposing a service charge for Special
Service District No. 3 (located along Excelsior Blvd. from Quentin Avenue to Monterey Drive/38th
St.). Annually, the City Council must set a service charge for the District following a public hearing
on the proposed charge. The Special Service District Advisory Board approved the proposed 2009
budget and service charges by ballot following their September 12, 2008 meeting. The notice of
public hearing was published in the Sun Sailor on October 2 and October 9, 2008. The public
hearing notice was sent to all property owners within the District more than ten (10) days prior to
the public hearing.
Special Service District No. 3 Financial Position: As of October 1, 2008 Special Service District
No. 3 had an anticipated year-end fund balance of approximately $ 29,519. Staff and the Advisory
Board have agreed that the operating reserve should be maintained at a level of at least 50% of the
annual operating budget. Given the health of the fund balance, for 2009 a portion of the fund
balance is proposed to be used to fund the operations of the District (see below).
Maximum Budget / Service Charge Restriction Parameters: The budget and service charge/
special assessment do not have to be the same dollar amount since excess operating reserves may be
used in some years. By ordinance, the maximum budget increase cannot exceed the previous year’s
authorized budget amount by more than the Consumer Price Index (CPI) increase, up to a
maximum of 5%. This adjustment is based upon the applicable CPI percentage increase for the
Minneapolis/St. Paul metropolitan area.
Proposed 2009 Budget and Service Charges: The Advisory Board recommended approval of the
following:
• 2009 budget amount of $63,000, an increase of $898 from 2008; and
• 2009 service charge amount of $34,650, an increase of $3,599 from 2008.
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 6e) Page 2
Subject: 2009 Budget and Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 3
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
The City incurs service charges for the property, within this district, located at 4760 Excelsior Blvd.,
which is undeveloped and owned by the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority. The
proposed fee for 2009 is $755.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
Attachments: 2009 Proposed Budget
Resolution with Attachment A 2009 Proposed Service Charges
Prepared by: Ann Boettcher, Administrative Supervisor
Reviewed by: Brian Hoffman, Director of Inspections
Approved by: Nancy Gohman, Deputy City Manager/HR Director
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 6e) Page 3
Subject: 2009 Budget and Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 3
CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK
Special Service District No. 3
2009 Budget
No.
Item
2008 Revised
Budget
2009
Proposed
Budget
6212 GENERAL SUPPLIES 500 500
6224 LANDSCAPING MATERIALS 2,300 4,300
6223.650 BANNER REPLACEMENT 3,600 0
6410 GENERAL PROFFESSIONAL
SERVICES
50 50
6410.678 SSD Mgmt Services 2,500 2,500
6630.772 SSD – Snow Removal 34,500 34,500
6630.773 SSD - Site Maintenance 1,000 1,000
6630.774 SSD – Banner Install/Removal 0 1,000
6630.775 SSD – Irrigation Service 3,000 3,000
6630.776 SSD – Decorative Install 2,400 2,400
6630.777 SSD – Landscape Service 9,000 10,500
6950 LEGAL NOTICES 110 110
7106 PUBLIC LIABILITY INSURANCE 202 200
7207.880 SSD Infrastructure Repair 0 0
7301.890 SSD Pedestrian 1,940 1,940
7302 GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE 0 0
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 62,102 63,000
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 6e) Page 4
Subject: 2009 Budget and Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 3
RESOLUTION NO. 08-____
RESOLUTION APPROVING 2009 BUDGET
AND SERVICE CHARGES FOR
SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT NO. 3
WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance No. 2224-02, the City Council created Special Service
District No. 3 (the “District”). The specific properties located within the District are identified on
Exhibit “A” attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 02-043, the City Council is authorized to impose
service charges within the District on a multi-year basis through and including the year 2012 for
taxes payable in said year; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 2.04 of Resolution No. 02-043, the maximum budget to
be imposed in any year will be subject to adjustment calculations based on Consumer Price Index
(CPI) data for the Minneapolis/St. Paul Metropolitan Area; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 3 of Resolution No. 02-043, the Service Charges shall be
payable and collected at the same time and in the same manner as provided for payment and
collection of ad valorem taxes; and
WHEREAS, the City is required by Statute to certify assessments to the County by
November 28, 2008.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis
Park as follows:
1. The 2009 Budget for Special Service District No. 3 of $63,000 is hereby approved as
recommended by the Special Service District No. 3 Advisory Board.
2. The authorized 2009 Service Charge for Special Service District No. 3 is $34,650 in
the amounts and against the properties specified on Exhibit “A” attached to this Resolution.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council October 20, 2008
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 6e)
Subject: 2009 Budget and Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 3 Page 5
Meeting Date: October 20, 2008
Agenda Item #: 6f
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
2009 Budget and Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 4.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Close Public Hearing. Motion to approve resolution setting the 2009 Budget and Property Owner
Service Charge for Special Service District No. 4 and directing staff to certify the annual service
charges to Hennepin County.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Does the City Council wish to approve SSD#4 budget and property owner service charge?
BACKGROUND:
On July 18, 2005, the City Council approved a resolution imposing a service charge for Special
Service District No. 4. (located along Excelsior Blvd west of Hwy 100). Annually, the City Council
must set a service charge for the District following a public hearing on the proposed charge. The
Special Service District Advisory Board approved the proposed 2009 budget and service charges by
ballot following their September 12, 2008 meeting. The notice of public hearing was published in
the Sun Sailor on October 2 and October 9, 2008. The public hearing notice was sent to all
property owners within the District more than ten (10) days prior to the public hearing.
Special Service District No. 4 Financial Position: As of October 1, 2008 Special Service District
No. 4 had an anticipated year-end fund balance of approximately $ 17,196. Staff and the Advisory
Board have agreed that the operating reserve should be maintained at a level of at least 50% of the
annual operating budget. Given the health of the fund balance, for 2009 a portion of the fund
balance is proposed to be used to fund the operations of the District (see below).
Maximum Budget / Service Charge Restriction Parameters: The budget and service charge/
special assessment do not have to be the same dollar amount since excess operating reserves may be
used in some years. By ordinance, the maximum budget increase cannot exceed the previous year’s
authorized budget amount by more than the Consumer Price Index (CPI) increase, up to a
maximum of 5%. This adjustment is based upon the applicable CPI percentage increase for the
Minneapolis/St. Paul metropolitan area.
Proposed 2009 Budget and Service Charges: The Advisory Board recommended approval of the
following:
• 2009 budget amount of $38,100, an increase of $73 from 2008; and
• 2009 service charge amount of $18,000, a decrease of $20,027 from 2008.
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 6f) Page 2
Subject: 2009 Budget and Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 4
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The City incurs service charges for the City
Municipal Parking Lot within this district, located on Excelsior Blvd. The proposed fee for 2009 is
$526.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
Attachments: 2009 Proposed Budget
Resolution with Attachment A 2009 Proposed Service Charges
Prepared by: Ann Boettcher, Administrative Supervisor
Reviewed by: Brian Hoffman, Director of Inspections
Approved by: Nancy Gohman, Deputy City Manager/HR Director
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 6f) Page 3
Subject: 2009 Budget and Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 4
CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK
Special Service District No. 4
2009 Budget
No.
Item
2008 Revised
Budget
2009
Proposed
Budget
6212 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,000 1,000
6224 LANDSCAPING MATERIALS 2,700 2,700
6223.650 BANNER REPLACEMENT 0 0
6410 GENERAL PROFFESSIONAL
SERVICES
50 50
6410.678 SSD Mgmt Services 2,500 2,500
6630.772 SSD – Snow Removal 0 0
6630.773 SSD - Site Maintenance 2,000 2,000
6630.774 SSD – Banner Install/Removal 1,500 1,500
6630.775 SSD – Irrigation Service 5,000 5,000
6630.776 SSD – Decorative Install 3,500 3,500
6630.777 SSD – Landscape Service 16,000 16,000
6950 LEGAL NOTICES 50 50
7106 PUBLIC LIABILITY INSURANCE 127 200
7207.880 SSD Infrastructure Repair 1,500 1,500
7301.890 SSD Pedestrian 1,750 1,750
7302 GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE 350 350
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 38,027 38,100
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 6f) Page 4
Subject: 2009 Budget and Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 4
RESOLUTION NO. 08-____
RESOLUTION APPROVING 2009 BUDGET
AND SERVICE CHARGES FOR
SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT NO. 4
WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance No. 2298.05, the City Council created Special Service
District No. 4 (the “District”). The specific properties located within the District are identified on
Exhibit “A” attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 05-100, the City Council is authorized to impose
service charges within the District on a multi-year basis through and including the year 2012 for
taxes payable in said year; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 2.04 of Resolution No. 05-100, the maximum budget to
be imposed in any year will be subject to adjustment calculations based on Consumer Price Index
(CPI) data for the Minneapolis/St. Paul Metropolitan Area; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 3 of Resolution No. 05-100, the Service Charges shall be
payable and collected at the same time and in the same manner as provided for payment and
collection of ad valorem taxes; and
WHEREAS, the City is required by Statute to certify assessments to the County by
November 28, 2008.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis
Park as follows:
1. The 2009 Budget for Special Service District No. 4 of $38,100 is hereby approved as
recommended by the Special Service District No. 4 Advisory Board.
2. The authorized 2009 Service Charge for Special Service District No. 4 is $18,000 in
the amounts and against the properties specified on Attachment “A” attached to this Resolution.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council October 20, 2008
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Meeting Date: October 20, 2008
Agenda Item #: 8a
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Ordinance Amending Sections of Chapter 6 – Building and Regulations and Chapter 8 Business and
Contractor Licensing.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to Adopt First Reading of Ordinance amending Section 6-179 and several sections in
Chapter 8 relating to Business and Contractor Licensing and set second reading for November 3,
2008.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Does the Council agree with the proposed revisions to amendments to Chapter 6 – Building and
Regulations and Chapter 8 Business and Contractor Licensing?
Does the Council wish to direct staff to insert the proposed fee adjustments and new fees
outlined in this report into the second reading of the 2009 Fee Schedule Appendix A on
November 3, 2008?
BACKGROUND:
Staff is proposing amendments to the City Code for provisions related to business licenses,
mechanical and tree maintenance contractors, payment of taxes, food and beverage licenses, massage
therapy licenses and rental licensing. In some sections, new fees or fee revisions are discussed by
section. The new and proposed fees are italicized in the report.
Licenses Division 1. Generally Sec. 8-36
In the case of a license suspension or revocation, the proposed amendment to this section of the
Ordinance would require license applicants to complete a new license application, payment of the
current license fee, and a minimum a pre-determined fee. The time and resulting costs incurred by
the city can be substantial when a license holder’s actions lead to suspension or revocation. If an
applicant requests the reinstatement of a license, the cost incurred during the process will be more
clearly defined and easily recouped. Specifying an amount in the fee appendix also gives us the
opportunity to inform the license holder during a suspension or revocation process what the
implications will be.
The proposed $250 fee for the license reinstatement fee is a new fee. Staff recommends that this
new fee be inserted into the second reading of the 2009 Fee Schedule Appendix A on November, 3,
2008.
Classification of food and beverage establishments and food
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 8a) Page 2
Subject: Ordinance Amending Sections of Chapter 6 – Building and Regulations and Chapter 8 Business and
Contractor Licensing
Class E Food License:
A school system is unique in having multiple food preparation and distribution sites operating as a
single entity. The proposal establishes a Class E food license and corresponding fee category which
would apply to Multi-site educational facilities with food and beverage service. Establishments
meeting the criteria will be required to complete only one application for all sites with a fee to reflect
the cost of service being provided at their facilities. This will simplify the license process for the
applicant and city without changing the food inspection program we follow under the MDH
delegation agreement. Making this change in the classification should make it easier for multi-site
educational facilities to apply for one license and they should see a reduction in the fee using this
method.
The proposed fee for this new license is $2,800. Staff recommends that this new fee be inserted into
the second reading of the 2009 Fee Schedule Appendix A on November 3, 2008.
Catering Vehicle Decal:
Vehicles used for catering by restaurants or catering services need to be inspected and identified that
they meet the MDH Food Code requirements since they often cross city boundaries. Establishing a
requirement for each catering vehicle inspection and annual license decal with fee will enable Health
Inspectors to know which vehicle have been inspected and may be used for food catering.
The new decal fee, proposed to be $75, will reflect the cost of completing the annual inspection of
the vehicle. Staff recommends that this new fee be inserted into the second reading of the 2009 Fee
Schedule Appendix A on November 3, 2008.
Massage Therapy Establishments Sec. 8-297
Health and sanitation requirements necessary for the physical space to properly operate a licensed
massage therapy establishment are currently not specified. Establishing minimum requirements for
cleaning, lighting, hand washing, and sanitation as a condition of licensing provides consistent
standards. The requirements would become effective for all establishments with the next licensing
period and should not create a hardship.
Currently a business license to operate a massage therapy establishment may now be issued to
someone with a criminal background in related illegal activities. The ordinance will require
applicants to provide a copy of their current government issued identification, complete an
application addendum, and a background check will be completed by the Police Department. This
is an important component to help ensure that legitimate massage establishments, either as part of a
medical office or stand alone business, are able to provide legitimate health services in the
community.
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 8a) Page 3
Subject: Ordinance Amending Sections of Chapter 6 – Building and Regulations and Chapter 8 Business and
Contractor Licensing
Mechanical Contractor Sec. 8-112. Exemptions
The proposed amendment to this ordinance would provide an additional exemption to Mechanical
Contractor licensing requirements for replacement or re-connection of a gas stove or gas clothes
dryer. This type of work is relatively simple without the need for installation of new gas piping. This
change will allow the work to be completed by plumbers or appliance stores providing delivery and
installation services in addition to homeowners who are currently exempt. Permit requirements in
the Minnesota State Construction Code would not be effected.
Tree Maintenance Contactor Sec. 8-161 through 8-165.
The proposed amendment to this ordinance is intended to clarify the language and scope of
contractors. Added conditions include:
• Proof that at least one employee for the company is a Certified Arborist at the time of
application.
• Tree services performed will be required to meet the ANSI standard.
These proposed changes would keep the program current with industry practice and help ensure that
licensed contractors are performing acceptable work within the community.
Payment of Taxes on Licensed Premises Sec. 8-188.
The proposed amendment to this ordinance for license holders that repeatedly fail to submit
payment of property taxes would reduce the notice of pending license suspension for non-payment
of property taxes from 30 days to 10 days on repeat violations within two years. This provides a
clear message to the license holder that property taxes must be paid when due and the appeals
process for a violation will not be available as a tool for extending the time for payment before
license suspension action is taken on repeat violations.
During the study session discussion on July 14, 2008, Council directed the city attorney and staff to
develop an ordinance modifying the business licensing of non-owner occupied homes. This
coincided with staff review of our property maintenance, business, and contractor licensing
programs. Several years have passed since re-codification of the City Code occurred, establishing
most of the current language. Experience has revealed some modifications which would be helpful
to improve effectiveness of the programs. The proposed revisions and discussion are as follows:
Certificate of Property Maintenance Sec. 6-179.
The proposed amendment to this ordinance would allow a seller to request a one-year extension of
the certificate if the property has not sold within one year from initial certificate issue date. For
condominiums, the proposal would make the initial certificate valid for property transactions for two
years. Real estate market conditions mean some properties are on the market for longer than one
year, currently requiring the seller to re-start the application and inspection process. Allowing the
certificate to be extended with a minimal fee and quick re-inspection, to verify building changes have
not occurred, will streamline the process. A two-year expiration period for certificates issued to
condominium owners should not create any issues since interior condition does not change quickly.
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 8a) Page 4
Subject: Ordinance Amending Sections of Chapter 6 – Building and Regulations and Chapter 8 Business and
Contractor Licensing
These changes should help accommodate real estate trends while continuing to provide the intended
benefits of the program.
The proposed $50 fee for extending the certificate of property maintenance is a new fee. Staff
recommends that this new fee be inserted into the second reading of the 2009 Fee Schedule
Appendix A on November 3, 2008.
Rental Licensing Sec. 8-326
During the study session discussion on July 14, 2008, Council directed the city attorney and staff to
develop an ordinance modifying the business licensing of non-owner occupied homes. This
coincided with staff review of our property maintenance, business, and contractor licensing
programs. Several years have passed since re-codification of the City Code occurred, establishing
most of the current language. Experience has revealed some modifications which would be helpful
to improve effectiveness of the programs. The proposed revisions and discussion are as follows:
Two significant program changes to rental licensing include:
• Deleting the exemption of townhomes and condominium dwelling units from the rental
licensing requirements.
• Extend the rental licensing program to include vacant properties.
Townhomes and Condominium/Cooperative Dwelling Units
Over the past few years several incidents at rental townhomes and condominium dwelling units have
occurred requiring Environmental Health and Police involvement. Complaints regarding renter
living conditions, unit condition (i.e. odor, trash) effecting neighbors, and crime/drug and disorderly
use violations justify including all rental units within the program. Townhomes and
condominium/cooperative dwelling units have similar issues as other rental properties and should be
subject to the property maintenance programs including the Crime Free/Drug Free components.
An estimated 200-600 additional rental units would be licensed by this change. The additional
license fee revenue would allow staffing resources if needed to accommodate the additional work.
As part of the public process, 3,000+ letters were mailed to all townhome and
condominium/cooperative property owners informing them of the proposed amendment and
inviting them to attend a public informational meeting. The meetings were held at City Hall,
Tuesday, September 23rd at 7 p.m. and Wednesday, September 24th at 10:00 a.m. A total of 20
people attended the meeting. Of the comments received, three people were not in favor of the rental
licensing; many others were either neutral or supported the proposal. Of those supporting the
proposal were some association board members who appreciated the inclusion of townhomes and
condominiums/cooperatives into the rental program.
The proposed new fee is $70 per condominium/cooperative unit. Staff recommends that this new
fee be inserted into the second reading of the 2009 Fee Schedule Appendix A on November 3, 2008.
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 8a) Page 5
Subject: Ordinance Amending Sections of Chapter 6 – Building and Regulations and Chapter 8 Business and
Contractor Licensing
Vacant Properties
The Foreclosure Property Group discussed creating some form of a vacant housing program or
registration. While the city has not experienced the high rate of foreclosures as other cities have, it
was decided to begin looking at procedures to better identify distressed properties to proactively
ensure maintenance. The proposed amendment eliminating the word “occupied” from the definition
under our rental licensing ordinance would require the vacant property to be licensed and therefore
subject to inspection. The standard annual license fee would apply.
As part of this report, fees for current rental licenses are being proposed to increase in 2009 as
follows:
• Single Family Unit $85 $90
• Duplexes both sides non-owner occupied $135 $140
• Multi-Family – Per building $145 $150
Per unit $9 $9.25
Staff recommends that the revised rental license fees be inserted into the second reading of the 2009
Fee Schedule Appendix A on November 3, 2008.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
Modifications to our licensing program will have a budget neutral effect. Any increase costs incurred
by the City would be recovered through establishing licensing fees. Licensing fees outlined in this
report will be included with the second reading of the proposed 2009 Fee Appendix.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
Attachments: Overview of Proposed Amendments – showing changes
Proposed Ordinance
Prepared by: Brian Hoffman, Director of Inspections
Approved by: Nancy Gohman, Deputy City Manager/HR Director
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 8a) Page 6
Subject: Ordinance Amending Sections of Chapter 6 – Building and Regulations and Chapter 8 Business and
Contractor Licensing
Overview of Proposed Amendments – showing changes
Article VI. Certificate of Property Maintenance
Sec. 6-179. Compliance; expiration.
(a) When the property use is legal in accordance with city zoning requirements and the property
complies with all applicable building, fire, health and property maintenance codes, a Certificate of
Property Maintenance will be issued by the city.
(b) A Certificate of Property Maintenance authorizes the transfer of property for a period of one
year from the date of issue, and two years for individual units in multi-family residential buildings.
The Certificate of Property Maintenance may only be used for property transfer by the owner named
on the Certificate of Property Maintenance or the owner's legal representative.
(c) A one year extension of the Certificate of Property Maintenance may be issued following a re-
inspection of the property and payment of a fee. Such fee shall be set from time to time by the city
and a schedule of such fees listed in appendix A to this Code.
Article II. Licenses Division 1. Generally
Sec. 8-36. Refusal, suspension, revocation and reinstatement.
Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, the city may refuse, suspend, revoke and reinstate
any license under this chapter as follows:
(1) The city may refuse to grant a license or license renewal and may suspend or revoke any
license at any time, for any reasonable cause, including failure of an applicant or licensee to
comply with provisions of this Code or other applicable federal, state or local laws or
regulations.
(2) Any applicant, within ten days of notice of denial, suspension or revocation of a license,
may request in writing an administrative hearing before the city manager. The city
manager shall promptly issue a written decision in the matter. The city manager's decision
may be appealed to the city council by filing a written appeal to the city clerk within ten
days of receiving written notice of the city manager's decision.
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 8a) Page 7
Subject: Ordinance Amending Sections of Chapter 6 – Building and Regulations and Chapter 8 Business and
Contractor Licensing
(3) The city council may appoint a committee of the city council or an independent hearing
officer to hear the matter, report findings of fact and a recommendation of disposition to
the city council. Hearings on the appeal shall be open to the public and the licensee or
applicant shall have the right to appear and be represented by legal counsel and to offer
evidence in such person's behalf. At the conclusion of the hearing, the city council shall
make a final decision.
(4) If a license is reinstated following suspension or revocation, the city may require the
applicant shall complete a new license application, and pay payment of the city's costs as a
condition of reinstatement of the license a reinstatement fee in addition to the current
license fee. Such fees shall be set from time to time by the city. As a further condition of
reinstatement, the licensee shall reimburse the city for all law enforcement costs, legal fees,
investigations, inspections or other professional fees incurred due to the licensee’s violation
of applicable laws, ordinances, regulations and conditions of the license. law enforcement
costs, legal fees, investigations, inspections or other professional fees incurred due to the
licensee's violation of applicable laws, ordinances, regulations and conditions of the license.
Subdivision III. Mechanical Contractor
Sec. 8-112. Exemptions.
The following persons are exempt from the licensing requirements of this subdivision:
(1) The owner-occupant of a one-family or two-family dwelling who is working on the owner-
occupant's own dwelling.
(2) Persons installing or working on process piping regulated under the state mechanical code.
(3) Persons replacing or reconnecting gas stoves and clothes dryers to existing gas piping when
not altering the existing gas piping.
Subdivision V. Tree Servicing, Maintenance and Removal Contractor
Sec. 8-161. License required.
Any person or company engaging in a business that maintains removes or treats trees within the
city must obtain a tree servicing, maintenance and removal contractor's license from the city.
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 8a) Page 8
Subject: Ordinance Amending Sections of Chapter 6 – Building and Regulations and Chapter 8 Business and
Contractor Licensing
Sec. 8-162. Application.
The applicant for a tree servicing, maintenance and removal contractor's license must submit a
completed application, provide proof of insurance and workers' compensation, a list of all vehicles
which will be operating within the city, including license plate numbers and in-house vehicle
identification numbers for such vehicles, and provide proof that at least one employee of the
applicant is currently recognized by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) as a Certified
Arborist at the time of the license application or renewal. Throughout the license term, the licensee
must notify the city of any additional vehicles which will be operating within the city under the tree
servicing, maintenance and removal contractor's license. Tree services must comply with American
National Standards Institute (ANSI) Standard A300 when pruning or otherwise servicing trees on
public or private property.
(Ord. No. 2181-00, § 4(16-205B.), 11-6-2000)
Sec. 8-163. Vehicle decal.
Each vehicle operating in the city under a tree servicing, maintenance and removal contractor's
license must have a valid city-issued decal identifying the licensed contractor affixed in a visible
location to such vehicle.
(Ord. No. 2181-00, § 4(16-205C.), 11-6-2000)
Sec. 8-164. Additional insurance required.
The tree service, maintenance and removal contractor shall provide proof of automobile
insurance through the term of the license, including coverage for all owned and hired vehicles used
for tree service, maintenance and removal solid waste collection within the city. Limits of liability
insurance should be for not less than the amount that shall be set from time to time by the city and a
schedule of such insurance rates is listed in appendix A to this Code. The policy of insurance shall
provide full insurance to cover all of the tree servicing, maintenance and removal contractor's
operating exposure, including, but not limited to, the picking up of the materials and the operation
of vehicles.
(Ord. No. 2181-00, § 4(16-205D.), 11-6-2000)
Sec. 8-165. Chemical treatment services.
If the applicant for a tree servicing, maintenance and removal contractor's license also provides
chemical treatment services for trees, a copy of the applicant's Minnesota state Department of
Agriculture commercial pesticide applicator license must accompany the license application.
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 8a) Page 9
Subject: Ordinance Amending Sections of Chapter 6 – Building and Regulations and Chapter 8 Business and
Contractor Licensing
DIVISION 3. BUSINESSES
Subdivision I. In General
Sec. 8-188. Payment of taxes on licensed premises.
(a) Any and all real estate taxes or special assessments levied against the property for which a
license application is made under this division must be current before such license is issued or
renewed.
(b) Upon receipt of evidence that such taxes or special assessments levied against any such
premises have become delinquent during the term of a license under this division, the city manager
shall notify the licensee of the delinquency and that all licenses issued for the premises shall be
suspended 30 days after date of the notice unless such taxes and special assessments are paid and the
county treasurer's receipt of such payment is delivered to the city manager. The license will remain
suspended and all licensed activity must cease until such time that the taxes and special assessments
are paid in full.
(c) The reinstatement of a license upon payment of delinquent taxes and assessments is
conditioned upon the taxes and assessments being paid on time for the two year period following
reinstatement. If this condition is not met and the taxes remain unpaid after the licensee receives a
ten day notice of the delinquency from the city manager or designee, the license shall be considered
revoked effective immediately. The revocation shall be final. The provisions of Section 8-36
relating to an administrative hearing and appeal to the city council shall not apply. No new business
license for the same activity or to the same licensee shall be issued for a period of one year.
Sec. 8-257. Classification of food and beverage establishments and food vending machines.
The city will classify each food and beverage establishment and food vending machine based on
the use occurring, in accordance with the food code, into one of the following categories before a
license is issued:
(1) Class H plus--Multiple use license permitting three or more uses of any risk class to
operate.
(2) Class H--High risk use license permitting up to two high risk uses or a single high risk use
with a single low or medium risk use.
(3) Class M--Medium risk use license permitting a single medium risk use.
(4) Class L--Low risk use license permitting a single low risk use.
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 8a) Page 10
Subject: Ordinance Amending Sections of Chapter 6 – Building and Regulations and Chapter 8 Business and
Contractor Licensing
(5) Class V--Food vending machines.
(6) Class S –Seasonal concession with low or medium risk.
(7) Class E – Multi-site educational facilities – Educational facility with multiple locations
within the city.
(8) Catering Vehicle Decal –Each vehicle used to transport food from a licensed facility must
have a valid city issued decal.
Subdivision VI. Therapeutic Massage Therapy Establishments
Sec. 8-296. License required.
No person shall engage in the business of operating a therapeutic massage therapy establishment
either exclusively or in connection with any other business enterprise without first obtaining a
therapeutic massage therapy establishment license from the city.
Sec. 8-297. Regulations adopted.
(a) Each licensed therapeutic massage therapy establishment in the city shall be constructed and
maintained in compliance with the health, safety and building regulations of the city, and all state
laws, rules and regulations, including but not limited to the following:
1.) Walls, floors and ceilings must be smooth, clean and in good repair. Low nap
carpeting is permitted provided it is kept clean and without wear or tear.
2.) Massage rooms must be equipped with lighting capable of illuminating horizontal
surfaces with a minimum intensity of 50 foot candles to facilitate room cleaning.
3.) Massage rooms must be equipped with mechanical air ventilation or an exhaust fan.
4.) A hot and cold water hand washing sink or an NSF approved portable hand sink
with soap and hand drying by mechanical or disposable towel is required in the
therapeutic massage area. Use of a public bathroom or janitor’s sink is not allowed.
(b) No customer or patron of a therapeutic massage therapy establishment shall be allowed to
enter the licensed premises after 8:30 p.m. and before 8:00 a.m. daily. No customer or patron of a
therapeutic massage therapy establishment shall be allowed to remain upon the licensed premises
after 9:15 p.m. and before 8:00 a.m. daily. Such restrictions on hours shall not apply where the
massage therapy is provided within a health/sports establishment, and in such case, the hours for
massage therapy must coincide with the health/sports establishment's hours of operation.
(c) During any hours in which any person is present on the licensed premises of a therapeutic
massage therapy establishment, such therapeutic massage therapy establishment shall be open to
inspection by city inspectors and police officers. Upon demand by any police officer, all persons
engaged in providing services in any therapeutic massage therapy establishment licensed premises
shall identify themselves, giving their true legal name and correct address.
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 8a) Page 11
Subject: Ordinance Amending Sections of Chapter 6 – Building and Regulations and Chapter 8 Business and
Contractor Licensing
(d) The applicant for a new license will be required to provide a copy of a current government
issued identification and complete a license application addendum authorizing a background check
to be completed by the Police Department.
Subdivision VIII. Rental Housing
Sec. 8-326. License required.
(a) The owner of a residential building or portion thereof operated as rental housing with one or
more dwelling units must obtain a rental housing license. The license shall contain a statement that
the tenant or tenants may contact the attorney general for information regarding the rights and
obligations of owners and tenants under state law. The statement shall include the telephone number
and address of the attorney general.
(b) The term “rental housing” means any occupied dwelling or dwelling unit that is not owner
occupied. The term includes any dwelling or dwelling unit which is either unoccupied or occupied
by a relative of the owner.
(c) Exceptions. No license shall be required under the following circumstances:
(1) A single family dwelling, single dwelling unit of a duplex, or condominium, or
townhouse, occupied by the dwelling owner for a minimum of six months per
calendar year.
(2) Rented rooms within an owner occupied dwelling unit.
(3) Rented dwelling units that are part of a condominium or townhouse association.
Unoccupied dwelling units being offered for sale which have been issued a Certificate of
Property Maintenance that remains in effect.
(d) The term “Owner” means the owner as determined by an examination of record title to the
property at the office of the Hennepin County Recorder.
Sec. 8-327. Required Application Information.
The owner must identify a designated property manager responsible for operation and
maintenance of each licensed property. Contact information for the owner and property manager
must be provided on the license application, and the owner must provide the city with any changes
occurring within the license period. The owner may be the designated property manager. The
owner must submit verification with the license application that the designated property manager
has attended required training as specified in this section and that the Crime Free/Drug Free and
Disorderly Use language required by this section is contained in the licensed property tenant lease or
leases.
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 8a) Page 12
Subject: Ordinance Amending Sections of Chapter 6 – Building and Regulations and Chapter 8 Business and
Contractor Licensing
(Ord. No. 2334-07, 08-10-2007)
Sec. 8-328. Crime Free/Drug Free Training.
The owner or property manager must have attended an approved training program in The
Minnesota Crime Free Multi-Housing Program before any rental license is issued. A Provisional
License may be issued for six months to accommodate the training schedule. An owner whose only
rental housing is either unoccupied or a single family dwelling unit homesteaded by a relative is
exempted from the training program.
(Ord. No. 2334-07, 08-10-2007)
Sec. 8-329. Maintenance.
The owner of a residential building or portion thereof operated as rental housing must maintain
all units, common space and exteriors of such buildings within the owner’s control in compliance
with the City Code, and state and federal laws and regulations. The owner of such rental housing
shall perform a periodic assessment of all portions of the building and correct any inadequacies to
ensure the building is maintained in good repair.
(Ord. No. 2334-07, 08-10-2007)
Sec. 8-330. City Inspections.
(a) The owner of rental housing shall permit access by the City to perform a minimum of one
inspection every two years of the common space and every dwelling unit and common space within
the owner’s control. The City may perform or require additional inspections if deemed necessary by
the City or by the request of a tenant. The owner shall notify the tenant or tenants of the time when
the City inspection will be conducted and provide access to the units.
(b) The owner’s rental housing license may be suspended, revoked or denied renewal for failing
to maintain the licensed building in compliance with the property maintenance code as set forth in
chapter 6, article V of this Code or otherwise failing to comply with the requirements of the City
Code or applicable state or federal law.
(Ord. No. 2334-07, 08-10-2007)
Sec. 8-331. Crime Free/Drug Free and Disorderly Use Lease Requirements.
(a) All tenant leases, except for state licensed residential facilities and subject to all preemptory
state and federal laws, shall contain the following Crime Free/Drug Free and Disorderly Use
language:
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 8a) Page 13
Subject: Ordinance Amending Sections of Chapter 6 – Building and Regulations and Chapter 8 Business and
Contractor Licensing
(1) Crime Free/Drug Free.
1. Resident, any members of the resident’s household or a guest or other person
affiliated with resident shall not engage in criminal activity, including drug-related
criminal activity, on or near the premises.
2. Resident, any member of the resident’s household or a guest or other person affiliated
with resident shall not engage in any act intended to facilitate criminal activity,
including drug-related criminal activity, on or near the premises.
3. Resident or members of the household will not permit the dwelling unit to be used
for, or to facilitate criminal activity, including drug-related criminal activity,
regardless of whether the individual engaging in such activity is a member of the
household, or a guest.
4. Resident, any member of the resident’s household or a guest, or other person
affiliated with the resident shall not engage in the unlawful manufacturing, selling,
using, storing, keeping, or giving of a controlled substance at any locations, whether
on or near the premises or otherwise.
5. VIOLATION OF THE ABOVE PROVISIONS SHALL BE A MATERIAL AND
IRREPARABLE VIOLATION OF THE LEASE AND GOOD CAUSE FOR
IMMEDIATE TERMINATION OF TENANCY.
(2) Disorderly Use.
1. Resident, members of the resident’s household, guests, or other persons under the
resident’s control shall not engage in the following Disorderly Use activities:
violations of state law relating to alcoholic beverages, trespassing or disorderly
conduct; and violation of the St. Louis Park City Code relating to zoning, nuisance
and prohibited noise.
2. THREE DISORDERLY USE VIOLATIONS INVOLVING THE SAME
TENANCY WITHIN A CONTINUOUS TWELVE MONTH PERIOD SHALL
BE A SUBSTANTIAL AND MATERIAL VIOLATION OF THE LEASE AND
GOOD CAUSE FOR TERMINATION OF THE TENANCY.
(3) Definitions.
1. The term “criminal activity” means prostitution, criminal street gang activity,
threatening, intimidating or assaultive behavior, the unlawful discharge of firearms,
or any other criminal activity on or near the premises that jeopardizes the health,
safety and welfare of the landlord, his agent, other resident, neighbor or other third
party, or involving imminent or actual serious property damage.
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 8a) Page 14
Subject: Ordinance Amending Sections of Chapter 6 – Building and Regulations and Chapter 8 Business and
Contractor Licensing
2. The term “drug related criminal activity” means the illegal manufacture, sale,
distribution, use, or possession with intent to manufacture, sell, distribute, or use of
a controlled substance or any substance represented to be drugs (as defined in
Section 102 of the Controlled Substance Act [21 U.S.C. 802]).
(4) Non-Exclusive Remedies. The Crime Free/Drug Free and Disorderly Use provisions are
in addition to all other terms of the lease and do not limit or replace any other
provisions.
(b) These lease provisions shall be incorporated into every new lease for a tenancy beginning
January 1, 2008 and all renewed leases by January 1, 2009.
(c) Upon determination by the Police Department that a licensed premises or unit within a
licensed premise was used in violation of the Crime Free/Drug Free provisions of Subsection (a) (1)
herein, the Police Department shall cause notice to be made to the owner and property manager of
the violation. The owner or property manager shall notify the tenant or tenants within ten days of
the notice of violation of the Crime Free/Drug Free lease language and proceed with termination of
the tenancy of all tenants occupying the unit. The owner shall not enter into a new lease for a unit
located in the licensed property with an evicted tenant for a period of one year after the eviction.
(d) Upon determination by the Police Department that a licensed premises or unit within a
licensed premises was used for Disorderly Use activities as set forth in Subsection (a)(2) herein, the
Police Department shall cause notice to be made to the owner and property manager of the violation
and direct the owner and property manager to take steps to prevent further Disorderly Use
violations.
(e) If a second Disorderly Use violation as determined by the Police Department occurs within a
continuous twelve month period involving the same tenancy, the Police Department shall cause
notice to be made to the owner and property manager of the second violation. The owner or
property manager shall respond in writing within ten (10) days of receipt of the notice with an
action plan to prevent further Disorderly Use violations.
(f) If a third Disorderly Use violation as determined by the Police Department occurs within a
continuous twelve month period involving the same tenancy, the Police Department shall cause
notice to be made to the owner and property manager of the third violation. The owner or property
manager shall notify the tenant or tenants within ten days of the Notice of Disorderly Use violation
of the Crime Free/Drug Free lease language within the lease and proceed with termination of the
tenancy of all tenants occupying the unit. The owner shall not enter into a new lease for a unit
located in the licensed property with an evicted tenant for a period of one year after the eviction.
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 8a) Page 15
Subject: Ordinance Amending Sections of Chapter 6 – Building and Regulations and Chapter 8 Business and
Contractor Licensing
(g) The provisions of Subsections (c), (d), (e), and (f) herein do not apply if the determination
that the premises have been used in violation of the Crime Free/Drug Free provisions of Subsections
(a)(1) and (a)(2) herein originates from a call from or at the request of one or more of the tenants
occupying the premises for police or emergency assistance, or in the case of domestic abuse, from a
call for assistance from any source. The term “domestic abuse” has the meaning given in Minn. Stat.
§ 518B.01, subd. 2.
Sec. 8-332. Administrative License Violation Fee.
An owner failing to proceed with an action to terminate the tenancy after Police Department
notification in accordance with a Crime Free/Drug Free violation or the third Disorderly Use
violation shall pay an administrative license violation fee of $750.00 for each calendar month that
the owner fails to proceed. Any outstanding fees must be paid prior to the city renewing a rental
license for the licensed premises.
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 8a) Page 16
Subject: Ordinance Amending Sections of Chapter 6 – Building and Regulations and Chapter 8 Business and
Contractor Licensing
Ordinance shown below includes all recommended additions, deletions and changes
ORDINANCE NO. _______
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO BUSINESS
AND RENTAL HOUSING LICENSING AND CERTIFICATES
OF MAINTENANCE, AMENDING CHAPTERS SIX AND
EIGHT OF THE ST. LOUIS PARK CODE OF ORDINANCES
THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK DOES ORDAIN:
Section 1. Section 8-36 of the St. Louis Park Code of Ordinances is amended to read in its
entirety as follows:
Sec. 8-36. Refusal, suspension, revocation and reinstatement.
Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, the city may refuse, suspend, revoke and
reinstate any license under this chapter as follows:
(1) The city may refuse to grant a license or license renewal and may suspend or revoke
any license at any time, for any reasonable cause, including failure of an applicant or
licensee to comply with provisions of this Code or other applicable federal, state or
local laws or regulations.
(2) Any applicant, within ten days of notice of denial, suspension or revocation of a
license, may request in writing an administrative hearing before the city manager.
The city manager shall promptly issue a written decision in the matter. The city
manager's decision may be appealed to the city council by filing a written appeal to
the city clerk within ten days of receiving written notice of the city manager's
decision.
(3) The city council may appoint a committee of the city council or an independent
hearing officer to hear the matter, report findings of fact and a recommendation of
disposition to the city council. Hearings on the appeal shall be open to the public
and the licensee or applicant shall have the right to appear and be represented by legal
counsel and to offer evidence in such person's behalf. At the conclusion of the
hearing, the city council shall make a final decision.
(4) If a license is reinstated following suspension or revocation, the applicant shall
complete a new license application, and pay a reinstatement fee in addition to the
current license fee. Such fees shall be set from time to time by the city and a schedule
of such fees listed in Appendix A to this Code. As a further condition of
reinstatement, the licensee shall reimburse the city for all law enforcement costs, legal
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 8a) Page 17
Subject: Ordinance Amending Sections of Chapter 6 – Building and Regulations and Chapter 8 Business and
Contractor Licensing
fees, investigations, inspections or other professional fees incurred due to the
licensee’s violation of applicable laws, ordinances, regulations and conditions of the
license.
Section 2. Section 8-112 of the St. Louis Park Code of Ordinances is amended to read in its
entirety as follows:
Sec. 8-112. Exemptions.
The following persons are exempt from the licensing requirements of this subdivision:
(1) The owner-occupant of a one-family or two-family dwelling who is working on the
owner-occupant's own dwelling.
(2) Persons installing or working on process piping regulated under the state mechanical
code.
(3) Persons replacing or reconnecting gas stoves and clothes dryers to existing gas piping
when not altering the existing gas piping.
Section 3. Section 8-161 through Section 8-165 of the St. Louis Park Code of Ordinances are
amended to read in its entirety as follows:
Subdivision V. Tree Servicing, Maintenance and Removal Contractor
Sec. 8-161. License required.
Any person or company engaging in a business that maintains removes or treats trees within
the city must obtain a tree servicing, maintenance and removal contractor's license from the city.
Sec. 8-162. Application.
The applicant for a tree servicing, maintenance and removal contractor's license must submit
a completed application, provide proof of insurance and workers' compensation, a list of all vehicles
which will be operating within the city, including license plate numbers and in-house vehicle
identification numbers for such vehicles, and provide proof that at least one employee of the
applicant is currently recognized by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) as a Certified
Arborist at the time of the license application or renewal. Throughout the license term, the licensee
must notify the city of any additional vehicles which will be operating within the city under the tree
servicing, maintenance and removal contractor's license. Tree services must comply with American
National Standards Institute (ANSI) Standard A300 when pruning or otherwise servicing trees on
public or private property.
(Ord. No. 2181-00, § 4(16-205B.), 11-6-2000)
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 8a) Page 18
Subject: Ordinance Amending Sections of Chapter 6 – Building and Regulations and Chapter 8 Business and
Contractor Licensing
Sec. 8-163. Vehicle decal.
Each vehicle operating in the city under a tree servicing, maintenance and removal
contractor's license must have a valid city-issued decal identifying the licensed contractor affixed in a
visible location to such vehicle.
(Ord. No. 2181-00, § 4(16-205C.), 11-6-2000)
Sec. 8-164. Additional insurance required.
The tree service, maintenance and removal contractor shall provide proof of automobile
insurance through the term of the license, including coverage for all owned and hired vehicles used
for tree service, maintenance and removal within the city. Limits of liability insurance should be for
not less than the amount that shall be set from time to time by the city and a schedule of such
insurance rates is listed in Appendix A to this Code. The policy of insurance shall provide full
insurance to cover all of the tree servicing, maintenance and removal contractor's operating exposure,
including, but not limited to, the picking up of the materials and the operation of vehicles.
(Ord. No. 2181-00, § 4(16-205D.), 11-6-2000)
Sec. 8-165. Chemical treatment services.
If the applicant for a tree servicing, maintenance and removal contractor's license also
provides chemical treatment services for trees, a copy of the applicant's Minnesota Department of
Agriculture commercial pesticide applicator license must accompany the license application.
Section 4. Section 8-188 of the St. Louis Park Code of Ordinances is amended to read in its
entirety as follows:
Sec. 8-188. Payment of taxes on licensed premises.
(a) Any and all real estate taxes or special assessments levied against the property for
which a license application is made under this division must be current before such license is issued
or renewed.
(b) Upon receipt of evidence that such taxes or special assessments levied against any
such premises have become delinquent during the term of a license under this division, the city
manager shall notify the licensee of the delinquency and that all licenses issued for the premises shall
be suspended 30 days after date of the notice unless such taxes and special assessments are paid and
the county treasurer's receipt of such payment is delivered to the city manager. The license will
remain suspended and all licensed activity must cease until such time that the taxes and special
assessments are paid in full.
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 8a) Page 19
Subject: Ordinance Amending Sections of Chapter 6 – Building and Regulations and Chapter 8 Business and
Contractor Licensing
(c) The reinstatement of a license upon payment of delinquent taxes and assessments is
conditioned upon the taxes and assessments being paid on time for the two year period following
reinstatement. If this condition is not met and the taxes remain unpaid after the licensee receives a
ten day notice of the delinquency from the city manager or designee, the license shall be considered
revoked effective immediately. The revocation shall be final. The provisions of Section 8-36
relating to an administrative hearing and appeal to the city council shall not apply. No new business
license for the same activity or to the same licensee shall be issued for a period of one year.
Section 5. Section 8-257 of the St. Louis Park Code of Ordinances is amended to read in its
entirety as follows:
Sec. 8-257. Classification of food and beverage establishments and food vending machines.
The city will classify each food and beverage establishment and food vending machine based
on the use occurring, in accordance with the food code, into one of the following categories before a
license is issued:
(1) Class H plus--Multiple use license permitting three or more uses of any risk class to
operate.
(2) Class H--High risk use license permitting up to two high risk uses or a single high
risk use with a single low or medium risk use.
(3) Class M--Medium risk use license permitting a single medium risk use.
(4) Class L--Low risk use license permitting a single low risk use.
(5) Class V--Food vending machines.
(6) Class S--Seasonal concession with low or medium risk.
(7) Class E--Multi-site educational facilities – Educational facility with multiple
locations within the city.
(8) Catering Vehicle Decal--Each vehicle used to transport food from a licensed facility
must have a valid city issued decal.
Section 6. Sections 8-296 and 8-297 of the St. Louis Park Code of Ordinances are amended to
read in its entirety as follows:
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 8a) Page 20
Subject: Ordinance Amending Sections of Chapter 6 – Building and Regulations and Chapter 8 Business and
Contractor Licensing
Subdivision VI. Therapeutic Massage Establishments
Sec. 8-296. License required.
No person shall engage in the business of operating a therapeutic massage establishment
either exclusively or in connection with any other business enterprise without first obtaining a
therapeutic massage establishment license from the city.
Sec. 8-297. Regulations adopted.
(a) Each licensed therapeutic massage establishment in the city shall be constructed and
maintained in compliance with the health, safety and building regulations of the city, and all state
laws, rules and regulations, including but not limited to the following:
(1) Walls, floors and ceilings must be smooth, clean and in good repair. Low
nap carpeting is permitted provided it is kept clean and without wear or tear.
(2) Massage rooms must be equipped with lighting capable of illuminating
horizontal surfaces with a minimum intensity of 50 foot candles to facilitate
room cleaning.
(3) Massage rooms must be equipped with mechanical air ventilation or an
exhaust fan.
(4) A hot and cold water hand washing sink or an NSF approved portable hand
sink with soap and hand drying by mechanical or disposable towel is required
in the therapeutic massage area. Use of a public bathroom or janitor’s sink is
not allowed.
(b) No customer or patron of a therapeutic massage establishment shall be allowed to
enter the licensed premises after 8:30 p.m. and before 8:00 a.m. daily. No customer or patron of a
therapeutic massage establishment shall be allowed to remain upon the licensed premises after 9:15
p.m. and before 8:00 a.m. daily. Such restrictions on hours shall not apply where the massage
therapy is provided within a health/sports establishment, and in such case, the hours for massage
therapy must coincide with the health/sports establishment's hours of operation.
(c) During any hours in which any person is present on the licensed premises of a
therapeutic massage establishment, such therapeutic massage establishment shall be open to
inspection by city inspectors and police officers. Upon demand by any police officer, all persons
engaged in providing services in any therapeutic massage establishment licensed premises shall
identify themselves, giving their true legal name and correct address.
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 8a) Page 21
Subject: Ordinance Amending Sections of Chapter 6 – Building and Regulations and Chapter 8 Business and
Contractor Licensing
(d) The applicant for a new license will be required to provide a copy of a current
government issued identification and complete a license application addendum authorizing a
background check to be completed by the Police Department.
Section 7. Section 8-326 through Section 8-332 of the St. Louis Park Code of Ordinances is
amended to read in its entirety as follows:
Subdivision VIII. Rental Housing
Sec. 8-326. License required.
(a) The owner of a residential building or portion thereof operated as rental housing
with one or more dwelling units must obtain a rental housing license. The license shall contain a
statement that the tenant or tenants may contact the attorney general for information regarding the
rights and obligations of owners and tenants under state law. The statement shall include the
telephone number and address of the attorney general.
(b) The term “rental housing” means any dwelling unit that is not owner occupied. The
term includes any dwelling unit which is either unoccupied or occupied by a relative of the owner.
(c) Exceptions. No license shall be required under the following circumstances:
(1) A dwelling unit occupied by the owner for a minimum of six months per
calendar year.
(2) Rented rooms within an owner occupied dwelling unit.
(3) Unoccupied dwelling units being offered for sale which have been issued a
Certificate of Property Maintenance that remains in effect.
(d) The term “Owner” means the owner as determined by an examination of record title
to the property at the office of the Hennepin County Recorder.
Sec. 8-327. Required Application Information.
The owner must identify a designated property manager responsible for operation and
maintenance of each licensed property. Contact information for the owner and property manager
must be provided on the license application, and the owner must provide the city with any changes
occurring within the license period. The owner may be the designated property manager. The
owner must submit verification with the license application that the designated property manager
has attended required training as specified in this section and that the Crime Free/Drug Free and
Disorderly Use language required by this section is contained in the licensed property tenant lease or
leases.
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 8a) Page 22
Subject: Ordinance Amending Sections of Chapter 6 – Building and Regulations and Chapter 8 Business and
Contractor Licensing
(Ord. No. 2334-07, 08-10-2007)
Sec. 8-328. Crime Free/Drug Free Training.
The owner or property manager must have attended an approved training program in The
Minnesota Crime Free Multi-Housing Program before any rental license is issued. A Provisional
License may be issued for six months to accommodate the training schedule. An owner whose only
rental housing is either unoccupied or a dwelling unit homesteaded by a relative is exempted from
the training program.
(Ord. No. 2334-07, 08-10-2007)
Sec. 8-329. Maintenance.
The owner of a residential building or portion thereof operated as rental housing must
maintain all dwelling units, common space and exteriors of such buildings within the owner’s
control in compliance with the City Code, and state and federal laws and regulations. The owner of
such rental housing shall perform a periodic assessment of all portions of the building and correct
any inadequacies to ensure the building is maintained in good repair.
(Ord. No. 2334-07, 08-10-2007)
Sec. 8-330. City Inspections.
(a) The owner of rental housing shall permit access by the City to perform a minimum
of one inspection every two years of every dwelling unit and common space within the owner’s
control. The City may perform or require additional inspections if deemed necessary by the City or
by the request of a tenant. The owner shall notify the tenant or tenants of the time when the City
inspection will be conducted and provide access to the units.
(b) The owner’s rental housing license may be suspended, revoked or denied renewal for
failing to maintain the licensed building in compliance with the property maintenance code as set
forth in chapter 6, article V of this Code or otherwise failing to comply with the requirements of the
City Code or applicable state or federal law.
(Ord. No. 2334-07, 08-10-2007)
Sec. 8-331. Crime Free/Drug Free and Disorderly Use Lease Requirements.
(a) All tenant leases, except for state licensed residential facilities and subject to all
preemptory state and federal laws, shall contain the following Crime Free/Drug Free and Disorderly
Use language:
(1) Crime Free/Drug Free.
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 8a) Page 23
Subject: Ordinance Amending Sections of Chapter 6 – Building and Regulations and Chapter 8 Business and
Contractor Licensing
1. Resident, any members of the resident’s household or a guest or other person
affiliated with resident shall not engage in criminal activity, including drug-
related criminal activity, on or near the premises.
2. Resident, any member of the resident’s household or a guest or other person
affiliated with resident shall not engage in any act intended to facilitate
criminal activity, including drug-related criminal activity, on or near the
premises.
3. Resident or members of the household will not permit the dwelling unit to
be used for, or to facilitate criminal activity, including drug-related criminal
activity, regardless of whether the individual engaging in such activity is a
member of the household, or a guest.
4. Resident, any member of the resident’s household or a guest, or other person
affiliated with the resident shall not engage in the unlawful manufacturing,
selling, using, storing, keeping, or giving of a controlled substance at any
locations, whether on or near the premises or otherwise.
5. VIOLATION OF THE ABOVE PROVISIONS SHALL BE A MATERIAL
AND IRREPARABLE VIOLATION OF THE LEASE AND GOOD
CAUSE FOR IMMEDIATE TERMINATION OF TENANCY.
(2) Disorderly Use.
1. Resident, members of the resident’s household, guests, or other persons
under the resident’s control shall not engage in the following Disorderly Use
activities: violations of state law relating to alcoholic beverages, trespassing or
disorderly conduct; and violation of the St. Louis Park City Code relating to
zoning, nuisance and prohibited noise.
2. THREE DISORDERLY USE VIOLATIONS INVOLVING THE SAME
TENANCY WITHIN A CONTINUOUS TWELVE MONTH PERIOD
SHALL BE A SUBSTANTIAL AND MATERIAL VIOLATION OF THE
LEASE AND GOOD CAUSE FOR TERMINATION OF THE
TENANCY.
(3) Definitions.
1. The term “criminal activity” means prostitution, criminal street gang activity,
threatening, intimidating or assaultive behavior, the unlawful discharge of
firearms, or any other criminal activity on or near the premises that
jeopardizes the health, safety and welfare of the landlord, his agent, other
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 8a) Page 24
Subject: Ordinance Amending Sections of Chapter 6 – Building and Regulations and Chapter 8 Business and
Contractor Licensing
resident, neighbor or other third party, or involving imminent or actual
serious property damage.
2. The term “drug related criminal activity” means the illegal manufacture, sale,
distribution, use, or possession with intent to manufacture, sell, distribute, or
use of a controlled substance or any substance represented to be drugs (as
defined in Section 102 of the Controlled Substance Act [21 U.S.C. 802]).
(4) Non-Exclusive Remedies. The Crime Free/Drug Free and Disorderly Use provisions
are in addition to all other terms of the lease and do not limit or replace any other
provisions.
(b) These lease provisions shall be incorporated into every new lease for a tenancy
beginning January 1, 2008 and all renewed leases by January 1, 2009.
(c) Upon determination by the Police Department that a licensed premises or unit
within a licensed premise was used in violation of the Crime Free/Drug Free provisions of
Subsection (a) (1) herein, the Police Department shall cause notice to be made to the owner and
property manager of the violation. The owner or property manager shall notify the tenant or tenants
within ten days of the notice of violation of the Crime Free/Drug Free lease language and proceed
with termination of the tenancy of all tenants occupying the unit. The owner shall not enter into a
new lease for a unit located in the licensed property with an evicted tenant for a period of one year
after the eviction.
(d) Upon determination by the Police Department that a licensed premises or unit
within a licensed premises was used for Disorderly Use activities as set forth in Subsection (a)(2)
herein, the Police Department shall cause notice to be made to the owner and property manager of
the violation and direct the owner and property manager to take steps to prevent further Disorderly
Use violations.
(e) If a second Disorderly Use violation as determined by the Police Department occurs
within a continuous twelve month period involving the same tenancy, the Police Department shall
cause notice to be made to the owner and property manager of the second violation. The owner or
property manager shall respond in writing within ten (10) days of receipt of the notice with an
action plan to prevent further Disorderly Use violations.
(f) If a third Disorderly Use violation as determined by the Police Department occurs
within a continuous twelve month period involving the same tenancy, the Police Department shall
cause notice to be made to the owner and property manager of the third violation. The owner or
property manager shall notify the tenant or tenants within ten days of the Notice of Disorderly Use
violation of the Crime Free/Drug Free lease language within the lease and proceed with termination
of the tenancy of all tenants occupying the unit. The owner shall not enter into a new lease for a
unit located in the licensed property with an evicted tenant for a period of one year after the
eviction.
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 8a) Page 25
Subject: Ordinance Amending Sections of Chapter 6 – Building and Regulations and Chapter 8 Business and
Contractor Licensing
(g) The provisions of Subsections (c), (d), (e), and (f) herein do not apply if the
determination that the premises have been used in violation of the Crime Free/Drug Free provisions
of Subsections (a)(1) and (a)(2) herein originates from a call from or at the request of one or more of
the tenants occupying the premises for police or emergency assistance, or in the case of domestic
abuse, from a call for assistance from any source. The term “domestic abuse” has the meaning given
in Minn. Stat. § 518B.01, subd. 2.
Sec. 8-332. Administrative License Violation Fee.
An owner failing to proceed with an action to terminate the tenancy after Police Department
notification in accordance with a Crime Free/Drug Free violation or the third Disorderly Use
violation shall pay an administrative license violation fee of $750.00 for each calendar month that
the owner fails to proceed. Any outstanding fees must be paid prior to the city renewing a rental
license for the licensed premises.
Section 8. Section 6-179 of the St. Louis Park Code of Ordinances is amended to read in its
entirety as follows:
Sec. 6-179. Compliance; expiration.
(a) When the property use is legal in accordance with city zoning requirements and the
property complies with all applicable building, fire, health and property maintenance codes, a
Certificate of Property Maintenance will be issued by the city.
(b) A Certificate of Property Maintenance authorizes the transfer of property for a period
of one year from the date of issue, and two years for individual units in multi-family residential
buildings. The Certificate of Property Maintenance may only be used for property transfer by the
owner named on the Certificate of Property Maintenance or the owner's legal representative.
(c) A one year extension of the Certificate of Property Maintenance may be issued
following a re-inspection of the property and payment of a fee. Such fee shall be set from time to
time by the city and a schedule of such fees listed in Appendix A to this Code.
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 8a) Page 26
Subject: Ordinance Amending Sections of Chapter 6 – Building and Regulations and Chapter 8 Business and
Contractor Licensing
Section 9. This Ordinance shall take effect January 1, 2009 after its publication.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council October 20, 2008
City Manager Mayor
Attest: Approved as to form and execution:
City Clerk City Attorney
Meeting Date: October 20, 2008
Agenda Item #: 8b
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
St. Louis Park Emergency Program (STEP) Conditional Use Permit.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to Adopt Resolution approving a Conditional Use Permit for excavation of over 400 cubic
yards of aggregate material at 2544 State Highway 100.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
The St. Louis Park Emergency Program (STEP) proposal requires approval of a Conditional Use
Permit for excavation. STEP representatives have demonstrated an ability to meet the conditions of
the Zoning Ordinance. Is the Council interested in approving the CUP as outlined below?
BACKGROUND:
The St. Louis Park Emergency Program (STEP) plans to move from its temporary location at 5925
State Highway 7 to the location at 2544 State Highway 100. To gain approval to begin
construction, STEP must first obtain a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for excavation of greater than
400 cubic yards of aggregate material from the site. STEP intends to begin construction in the
spring of 2009, in order to avoid winter construction conditions.
STEP offers services to St. Louis Park residents who are experiencing a crisis. Emergency services
include transportation, food shelf, clothing closet and financial assistance for rent, mortgage or
utilities. Participants in STEP’s programs must set up an appointment in order to participate; STEP
does not serve residents on a drop-in basis.
Zoning Review
Analysis for the STEP proposal, while focused predominately on the CUP for excavation, also
included a review of the project within the context of the Zoning Ordinance. It is important to note
that the Planning Commission public hearing and recommendation is not tied to the proposed
permanent use of the site, but rather to the temporary use of “excavation.” Zoning issues are
summarized as follows:
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Page 2
Subject: St. Louis Park Emergency Program (STEP) Conditional Use Permit
Land Use
The new STEP facility is considered a community center, which is allowed within the R-1 Zoning
District as “permitted with conditions.” The STEP site plan and associated documents meet all the
conditions included in the Zoning Ordinance for this use type. Under the ordinance, a community
center is “a place…designed to accommodate and serve significant segments of the community and
which is used for educational, religious, fraternal, social and recreational programs.”
Height
At a maximum height of 18’, the proposed STEP building falls well below the maximum height of
30’ permitted in the R-1 Zoning District and also below the height of the existing church, which
reaches almost 40’ in height. However, the 18’ height of the building will only be apparent from the
north. To the west and south, the new addition will appear to reach no more than 6-8’ in height.
This is accomplished by constructing the building into an existing hill. The result of constructing
the building into the hill is that the building will scarcely be visible from the residential properties to
the south and the west of the site.
Landscaping and Tree Replacement
The STEP proposal includes the addition of 16 new trees to the site. It also provides for the
construction of several new rain gardens on the site, satisfying the alternative vegetation
requirements found in the landscape ordinance. The building addition will enable the church to
continue with the development of its prairie vegetation between the structure and the Highway 100
frontage road.
Factor Required Proposed Met?
Use R-1 Zoning District Community Center
Permitted with conditions
Yes
Height 30’ maximum 18’ Yes
Setbacks – North / South 50’ 50’ 70’ 165’ Yes
Setbacks – West / East 50’ 30’ 123’ NA Yes
Off-Street Parking 83 spaces – shared
parking included
54 total spaces on-site
35 proof-of-parking spaces
provided
Yes
Bicycle Parking 4 spaces 4 spaces Yes
Floor Area Ratio 0.35 maximum 0.11 Yes
Tree replacement 37.8 caliper inches 40 caliper inches Yes
Landscaping 9 trees
36 shrubs
16 trees
Alternative landscaping per
36-364 (g)
Yes
Stormwater Required city and
watershed standards
Rain gardens and rooftop storage
provided
Yes
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Page 3
Subject: St. Louis Park Emergency Program (STEP) Conditional Use Permit
Due to the construction of the addition, some trees will need to be removed from the site. The
architects and landscape architects working on the project have worked closely with Staff to improve
the site plan in favor of tree preservation. In previous plans, including several shared with the
neighborhood, substantially more trees had been shown as removed. The current plan minimizes
tree removal and enhances the site through new plantings in appropriate locations.
Site Access
Access to the site is off of the Highway 100 frontage road. There is no access to Vernon Avenue,
except through the use of a paved trail from the parking lot. It is not expected that the building
addition will increase the use of the trail. St. Louis Park residents receiving assistance from STEP
must have an appointment in order to visit the facility, and typically arrive by car.
Building Materials
The architectural style of the proposed addition will complement the existing church building. The
existing architectural style is distinct and constructed primarily of wood siding. The proposed
building will, through the use of hardi-board siding, mimic the existing building as much as possible.
The portions of the building that will be located below-grade, including those portions where the
building is built into the hill, will be constructed of concrete block.
Conditional Use Permit for Excavation
In order to construct the proposed community center at grade with the existing parking lot, STEP
has proposed constructing its building into the hillside to the west of the existing church building.
To do so, more than 400 cubic yards of soil will need to be removed from the site. However, by
constructing the building into the hillside, the building’s low profile will make it nearly invisible
from all nearby residential parcels.
Haul Route
Trucks hauling materials being removed from the site have direct access both north and south on
Highway 100 from the frontage road. The truck route will be the frontage road north and south to
Highway 100. Trucks will be restricted by the CUP from using other streets in the neighborhood.
Because of the easy access to Highway 100, no traffic impacts are expected as a result of the
excavation process.
Timeline
Excavation of the hillside will be complete in approximately one to one and a half weeks. During
this time, there will be heavy truck traffic into and out of the site on the adjacent frontage road.
Once the excavation is complete, truck traffic at the site will subside and be more typical of a regular
construction project.
Construction Period
Construction of the building addition will take between six and nine months. During construction,
erosion and sediment control measures will be in place per the requirements of the City and the
Minnehaha Creek Watershed District.
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Page 4
Subject: St. Louis Park Emergency Program (STEP) Conditional Use Permit
Summary
The STEP proposal meets the zoning requirements and is permitted with conditions. A Conditional
Use Permit is required not for the long term use of the site, but for the excavation of over 400 cubic
yards of aggregate material. At the Planning Commission public hearing on October 15th, the
Planning Commission recommended approval of the Conditional Use Permit.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
The City has directed 2007 Community Development Block Grant funding from Federal Sources to
pay for the STEP project’s soft costs, including the architectural design and engineering work. No
other City funding is associated with the STEP proposal.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
The construction of the new STEP building will result in an enhanced community gathering space
providing for the needs of St. Louis Park residents facing crisis. Through the work of the STEP
organization, St. Louis Park strives to make the goals of the community Vision available to all
residents, despite temporary setbacks and emergency situations. The new building will enhance St.
Louis Park’s ability to remain an inclusive community for many years into the future.
Attachments: Resolution – Conditional Use Permit
Location Map
Haul Route
Site Plans and related documents
Prepared by: Adam Fulton, Planner
Reviewed by: Meg McMonigal, Planning and Zoning Supervisor
Kevin Locke. Community Development Director
Approved by: Nancy Gohman, Deputy City Manager/HR Director
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Page 5
Subject: St. Louis Park Emergency Program (STEP) Conditional Use Permit
RESOLUTION NO. 08-___
A RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT UNDER
SECTION 36-79 OF THE ST. LOUIS PARK ORDINANCE CODE
RELATING TO ZONING TO PERMIT EXPORT OF MORE THAN 400
CUBIC YARDS OF SOIL FOR PROPERTY ZONED R-1 SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL LOCATED AT 2544 STATE HIGHWAY 100
BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park:
Findings
1. The St. Louis Park Emergency Prorgam (STEP) has made application to the City Council for
a Conditional Use Permit under Section 36-79 of the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code for the
purpose of exporting more than 400 cubic yards of soil within a R-1 Single Family Residential
District located at 2455 State Highway 100 for the legal description as follows, to-wit:
Par 1: That part of the South 336.2 feet, as measured along the West line thereof, of the
Northwest Quarter of Section 31, Township 29, Range 24, lying Westerly of a line parallel
to and 100 feet Westerly from the following described line: Beginning at a point on the
North line of said Northwest Quarter, distant 1316.42 feet West from the Northeast corner
thereof; thence Southwesterly at an angle of 78 degrees 57 minutes 13 seconds with said
North line a distance of 801.9 feet; thence deflecting to the right on a 1 degree curve, delta
angle 9 degrees 4 minutes, a distance of 906.7 feet; thence on a tangent to said curve a
distance of 527.4 feet; thence deflecting to the left on a 1 degree 30 minute curve, radius
3819.83 feet, a distance of 700 feet and there terminating.
Par 2: That part of the North Half of the vacated 26th St. dedicated in the palt of
“American Security Investment Co’s Oak Terrace” lying between the Northerly extensions
across it of the East and West lines of Lot 14, Block 2, in said plat.
Subject to snow fence easements in favor of the State of Minnesota, as set forth in Book
1390 of Deeds, Page 373 and in Book 412 of Miscellaneous Records, Page 148; (as to land
in Par 1)
Subject to an easement for trunk highway purposes in favor of the State of Minnesota, over
and across the South 30 feet lying East of the West 330 feet and Westerly of Trunk Highway
No. 100=130, said easement acquired by deed of highway easement dated June 4, 1936,
recorded in the office of the Register of deeds in Book 1390 of Deeds, Page 373, on
September 11, 1936; (as to land in Par 1)
Subject to a sewer easement in favor of the City of St. Louis Park described as follows: That
part of the North 15 feet of the South 238.7 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Page 6
Subject: St. Louis Park Emergency Program (STEP) Conditional Use Permit
Quarter of Section 31, Township 29, Range 24 lying east of the West 188.1 feet thereof and
West of State Highway No. 100. Also the North 112.5 feet of the South 336.2 feet of the
East 15 feet of the West 188.1 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of
said Section. Being the easement acquired by condemnation proceedings as recorded in
Book 2239 of Deeds on Page 133; (as to land in Par 1)
2. The City Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning
Commission (Case No. 08-31-CUP) and the effect of the proposed export of soil on the health,
safety and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic
conditions, the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area, the effect of the use on the
Comprehensive Plan, and compliance with the intent of the Zoning Ordinance.
3. The Council has determined that the export of soil will not be detrimental to the health,
safety, or general welfare of the community nor will it cause serious traffic congestion nor hazards,
nor will it seriously depreciate surrounding property values, and the proposed export of soil is in
harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive
Plan.
4. The contents of Planning Case File 08-31-CUP are hereby entered into and made part of the
public hearing record and the record of decision for this case.
Conclusion
The Conditional Use Permit to permit the export of more than 400 cubic yards of soil at 2544
State Highway 100 is granted based on the findings set forth above and subject to the following
conditions:
1. The site shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with Exhibits incorporated
by reference herein.
2. Prior to starting any site work, the following conditions shall be met:
a. A pre-excavation conference shall be held with the appropriate development,
construction and city representatives.
b. All necessary erosion control measures shall be installed.
c. All necessary permits must be obtained.
3. The applicant shall comply with the following conditions during excavation:
a. All City noise ordinances shall be complied with, including that there be no construction
activity between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. on weekdays and 10:00 p.m. and 9:00
a.m. on weekends.
b. Loud equipment shall be kept as far as possible from residences at all times.
c. The site shall be kept free of dust and debris that could blow onto neighboring
properties.
d. Public streets shall be maintained free of dirt and shall be cleaned as necessary.
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Page 7
Subject: St. Louis Park Emergency Program (STEP) Conditional Use Permit
e. The Zoning Administrator may impose additional conditions if it becomes necessary in
order to mitigate the impact of excavation on surrounding properties.
4. The applicant shall follow the following haul route:
a. Traveling south, all vehicles shall travel along the Highway 100 frontage road and
directly enter onto Highway 100. Traveling north, all vehicles shall travel along the
Highway 100 frontage road and directly enter onto Highway 100.
b. Vehicles hauling excavation materials are prohibited from traveling on residential streets.
In addition to any other remedies, the developer or owner shall pay an administrative fee of
$750 per violation of any condition of this approval.
Under the Zoning Ordinance Code, this permit shall be revoked and cancelled if the
building or structure for which the conditional use permit is granted is removed.
Approval of a Building Permit, which may impose additional requirements.
The City Clerk is instructed to record certified copies of this resolution in the Office of the
Hennepin County Register of Deeds or Registrar of Titles as the case may be.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council October 20, 2008
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
HIGHWAY 100 S27TH ST WWEBSTER AVE SVERNON AVE S25 1/2 ST W
UTICA AVE S26TH ST W
TOLEDO AVE SHIGHWAY 100 S26TH ST W
25 1/2 ST W
HIGHWAY 100 SHIGHWAY 100 S26TH ST W
2544 State Highway 100 - Luthern Church of the ReformationSt. Louis Park Emergency Program (STEP)Conditional Use Permit for Excavation
$
October 15, 2008
3
Zoning Classification
R1 - Single Family Residential
R2 - Single Family Residential
R3 - Two Family Residential
R4 - Multi-Familiy Residential
RC - Multi-Family Residential
POS - Parks and Open Space
MX - Mixed-Use
C1 - Neighborhood Commercial
C2 - General Commercial
O - Office
IP - Industrial Park
IG - General Industrial
210
Feet
R-1
R-1
R-C
X
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 8b)
Subject: St. Louis Park Emergency Program (STEP) Conditional Use Permit Page 8
Proposed Route for Excavation Materials2544 Highway 100 South (STEP)
Hwy 100
Hwy 100
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 8b)
Subject: St. Louis Park Emergency Program (STEP) Conditional Use Permit Page 9
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Subject: St. Louis Park Emergency Program (STEP) Conditional Use PermitPage 10
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Subject: St. Louis Park Emergency Program (STEP) Conditional Use PermitPage 11
Vernon AvenueService RoadState Highway No. 100FFE=886.00=100.00
PROPOSED STEP BUILDING
C200
GRADING, DRAINAGE,
AND EROSION
CONTROL PLANSTEPMeeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 8b)
Subject: St. Louis Park Emergency Program (STEP) Conditional Use Permit Page 12
Vernon AvenueService RoadState Highway No. 1001
2
3
3
3
3
3
4
5
6 6 Vernon AvenueService RoadState Highway No. 100FFE=886.00=100.00
PROPOSED STEP BUILDING
4
6 6
2 2
3
3
1
58
3
3
1
1
C600
STORMWATER
POLLUTION
PREVENTION PLANSTEPMeeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 8b)
Subject: St. Louis Park Emergency Program (STEP) Conditional Use Permit Page 13
Significant Significant
Trees on Site Trees Removed
Tree Tag Tree Tree Size Tree Caliper Caliper
Number Specie DBH Inches Status Inches Inches
1 Aspen 9.8 ocl
2 Aspen 9.6 ocl
3 Ash 6.4 ocl 6.4
4 Ash 7.2 ocl 7.2
5 Ash 8.6 ocl 8.6
6 Ash 9.3 ocl 9.3
7 Boxelder 14.1 ocl
8 Black Cherry 12 ocl 12
9 Aspen 9.1 ocl
10 Aspen 8.8 ocl
11 Ash 6.5 significant 6.5 6.5
12 Siberian Elm 8.4 not signif 8.4
13 Black Cherry 7.4 significant 7.4 7.4
14 Black Cherry 7.1 significant 7.1 7.1
15 Bur Oak 11.6 significant 11.6 11.6
16 Bur Oak 7.4 significant 7.4 7.4
17 Black Cherry 6 significant 6 6
18 Black Cherry 6.5 significant 6.5 6.5
19 Black Cherry 9.3 significant 9.3 9.3
20 Ash 6.1 significant 6.1 6.1
21 Black Cherry 9.1 significant 9.1 9.1
22 Black Cherry 6.7 significant 6.7 6.7
23 Black Cherry 6.1 significant 6.1 6.1
24 Cottonwood 24.2 not signif
25 Siberian Elm 9.7 significant 9.7 9.7
26 Cottonwood 18.9 not signif
27 Black Cherry 8.4 significant 8.4 8.4
28 Black Cherry 6 significant 6 6
29 Ash 7.6 significant 7.6 7.6
30 Ash 7.8 significant 7.8 7.8
31 Boxelder 11.7 not signif
32 Black Cherry 6.5 significant 6.5 6.5
33 Black Cherry 7.1 significant 7.1 7.1
34 Green Ash 6.1 significant 6.1 6.1
35 Cottonwood 18.4 not signif
36 Cottonwood 15.1 not signif
37 Cottonwood 8 not signif
38 Cottonwood 20.7 not signif
39 Cottonwood 23.1 not signif
40 American Elm 9.2 poor
41 Cottonwood 10.6 poor
42 Cottonwood 12.1 not signif
43 Cottonwood 25.4 not signif
44 American Linden 15.2 significant 15.2 15.2
45 American Linden 6.9 significant 6.9 6.9
46 American Linden 9.1 significant 9.1 9.1
47 Red Oak 10.2 significant 10.2 10.2
48 American Linden 6.2 significant 6.2 6.2
49 Cottonwood 28.5 not signif
50 Cottonwood 17 not signif
51 Pin Oak 24.2 significant 24.2 24.2
52 Red Oak 22.4 significant 22.4 22.4
53 Ash 9.1 significant 9.1 9.1
54 American Elm 11.8 significant 11.8 11.8
55 Ash 7.7 significant 7.7 7.7
56 Pin Oak 9.5 significant 9.5 9.5
57 American Linden 18.9 significant 18.9 18.9
58 Pin Oak 15.1 significant 15.1 0
59 Red Oak 17.4 significant 17.4 0
60 Pin Oak 20 significant 20 0
61 Red Oak 16.3 significant 16.3 0
62 Red Oak 8.4 significant 8.4 0
63 Red Oak 13.1 significant 13.1 0
64 Red Oak 10.8 ocl 10.8
65 Red Oak 16.6 ocl 16.6
66 Pin Oak 26.1 ocl 26.1
67 Red Oak 9.9 ocl 9.9
68 Red Oak 11 ocl 11
69 Pin Oak 22.3 ocl 22.3
70 Red Oak 16.6 significant 16.6 0
71 Red Oak 14.8 significant 14.8 0
72 Red Oak 19.3 ocl 19.3
73 Red Oak 15.5 ocl 15.5
74 Red Oak 11 ocl 11
75 Red Oak 16 ocl 16
76 Red Oak 34.5 significant 34.5 34.5
77 Ash 7.8 ocl 7.8
78 Boxelder 9.1 ocl
79 Pin Oak 18 significant 18 0
80 Bur oak 18.3 significant 18.3 18.3
81 Boxelder 12.8 not signif
82 American Elm 9.3 significant 9.3 9.3
83 Cottonwood 20.3 not significant 20.3
84 Cottonwood 14.5 not significant 14.5
85 Cottonwood 10.78 not significant 10.78
86 American Elm 9.6 not significant 9.6
87 Cottonwood 22.6 not significant 22.6
88 Cottonwood 16.7 not significant 16.7
89 Cottonwood 21.6 not significant 21.6
90 Cottonwood 12.8 not significant 12.8
91 Green Ash 7 ocl 7
92 American Linden 11.7 ocl / poor
93 Ash 6.5 ocl 6.5
94 Ash 6.5 ocl 6.5
95 Pin Oak 16.6 ocl 16.6
96 Red Oak 13.2 ocl 13.2
97 Red Oak 15.5 ocl 15.5
98 Pin Oak 25.6 ocl 25.6
99 Red Oak 27.9 ocl 27.9
100 Red Oak 14.5 ocl 14.5
101 Red Oak 18.5 ocl 18.5
102 American Linden 9.5 ocl 9.5
103 Ash 6.2 ocl 6.2
104 Red Oak 11.1 ocl / poor
105 Red Oak 10.4 ocl / poor
106 Red Oak 13 significant 13 0
107 Red Oak 26.1 poor
108 Red Oak 16.6 significant 16.6 0
109 Red Oak 15.5 significant 15.5 15.5
110 Red Oak 15.8 ocl 15.8
111 Red Oak 14.5 ocl 14.5
112 Red Oak 27.4 ocl / poor
113 Red Oak 31.8 ocl / poor
114 Red Oak 23.4 ocl 23.4
115 Red Oak 22 ocl 22
116 Red Oak 24.9 ocl 24.9
117 American Elm 8 ocl 8
118 Ash 6.2 ocl 6.2
119 Siberian Elm 8 ocl 8
120 Japanese Yew Tree 36 ocl 36
121 Japanese Yew Tree 36 ocl 36
122 Norway Maple 12 ocl 12
123 Green Ash 16 ocl 16
124 Green Ash 22 ocl 22
125 Green Ash 28 ocl 28
126 Red Oak 18 ocl 18
127 Littleleaf Linden 16 ocl 16
128 Littleleaf Linden 18 ocl 18
129 Black cherry 8 ocl 8
130 Black cherry 10 ocl 10
131 Black cherry 12 ocl 12
1416.48 377.8
Summary ((A/B)-0.20) x C x A = D
Total Caliper Inches of Significant Trees proposed for removal A 377.8
Total Caliper Inches of Significant Trees on Property B 1416.48
377.8 divided by 1416.48 0.2667175
0.266717497 minus 0.2 0.0667175
0.066717497 times C 1.5 0.10007625
0.100076245 times 377.8 D 37.8088055 caliper inches required.
15.1235222 2.5" trees
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 8b)
Subject: St. Louis Park Emergency Program (STEP) Conditional Use Permit Page 14
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Subject: St. Louis Park Emergency Program (STEP) Conditional Use PermitPage 15
Meeting Date: October 20, 2008
Agenda Item #: 8c
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Call for Sale of General Obligation Revenue Bonds.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to Adopt Resolution Providing for Sale of:
• $4,075,000 G.O. Utility Revenue Bonds (MSC), Series 2008A and
• $5,625,000 G.O. Tax Increment Revenue Bonds, Series 2008B (Park Place Blvd)
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Does the City Council agree with staff and consultants that there are sufficient resources available to
over time to repay the bonds to be issued?
Are the bonds issued for a period of time that is equal to or less than the expected useful life of the
assets to be constructed?
BACKGROUND:
These general obligation (GO) utility revenue bonds need to be issued to provide funds for the
construction of an addition on the Municipal Service Center (MSC). This will allow for the
relocation of Utility Department staff and equipment from Fire Station #1 to the MSC as a first step
to constructing a new fire station.
This bond issue is expected to be paid back through utility user charges. The City Council reviewed
a rate study in 2006 which recommended an increase in user fees in order to maintain an aggressive
construction schedule for utility infrastructure. That study also recommended issuing utility revenue
bonds every couple years in order to finance that construction. An update of that analysis is
currently being performed. The new projection is scheduled to be discussed with the City Council
on the November 24 work session. That analysis will help staff and the council with setting utility
rates that will be adopted in December. This bond issue is consistent with the Financial
Management Plan presented to the City Council this spring in regard to all the activities required to
complete the new fire stations.
GO tax increment revenue (TIF) bonds need to be issued to cover the cost of improvements to Park
Place Boulevard that are being made in conjunction with the West End redevelopment project. This
issue was anticipated in the development agreement and TIF agreement negotiated with Duke at the
end of last year. These bonds will be repaid with revenues generated through the redevelopment of
the property at I-394 and Hwy 100.
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 8c) Page 2
Subject: Call for Sale of General Obligation Revenue Bonds
A representative from Ehlers & Associates will be present to discuss the bond sale process with the
City Council on Monday evening. The attached memo and proposed schedule represent their
estimate of the potential interest rates. The actual rates and dollar amount of the sale will vary
depending on the market conditions on the sale date.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
Issuance of these bonds is necessary to provide funding of necessary projects in the city.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Not Applicable.
Attachments: Resolution
Presale Report from Ehlers & Associates
Prepared by: Bruce DeJong, Finance Director
Approved by: Nancy Gohman, Deputy City Manager/HR Director
Meeting of October 20, 2008 (Item No. 8c) Page 3
Subject: Call for Sale of General Obligation Revenue Bonds
RESOLUTION NO. 08-___
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE SALE OF
$4,075,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION UTILITY REVENUE BONDS SERIES 2008A
AND
$5,625,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 2008B
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, has heretofore
determined that it is necessary and expedient to issue the City's $4,075,000 General Obligation
Utility Revenue Bonds Series 2008A and $5,625,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds,
Series 2008B (the "Bonds") to finance the cost of various capital improvements; and
WHEREAS the City has retained Ehlers & Associates, Inc., in Roseville, Minnesota
("Ehlers"), as its independent financial advisor for the Bonds and is therefore authorized to solicit
proposals in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 2(9);
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis
Park, Minnesota:
1. Authorization; Findings. The City Council hereby authorizes Ehlers to solicit
proposals for the sale of the Bonds.
2. Meeting; Proposal Opening. The City Council shall meet at 7:30 P.M. on
November 17, 2008, for the purpose of considering sealed proposals for and
awarding the sale of the Bonds.
3. Official Statement. In connection with said sale, the officers or employees of the City
are hereby authorized to cooperate with Ehlers and participate in the preparation of
an official statement for the Bonds and to execute and deliver it on behalf of the City
upon its completion.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council October 20, 2008
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
BOND ISSUE PRE-SALE REPORT
October 20, 2008
Proposed Issue: $4,075,000 G.O. Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2008A; and
$5,625,000 G.O. Tax Increment Bonds, Series 2008B (collectively
the “Bonds”) The Bonds will be secured by the full faith and credit of
the taxpayers of the City of St. Louis Park but will be paid from
revenues other than tax levies.
Purpose: Proceeds from the Series 2008A Bonds will fund $4,000,000 of various
water and sewer projects including the construction of the MSC building
improvements. It is expected that net revenues of the sewer and water
utilities will support the principal and interest payments. Expected debt
service schedules are attached as Exhibit A.
The Series 2008B Bonds will fund $4,968,887 of the City’s public
improvements associated with the West End TIF District (Park Place
Boulevard). A breakdown of bond sources and uses and expected debt
service schedules are attached as Exhibit B.
Authority and
Rating:
The 2008A Bonds are being issued pursuant to Chapter 444, which
allows cities to issue debt without limitation as long as debt service is
expected to be paid from water and sewer revenues.
The 2008B Bonds are being issued pursuant to Minnesota Statues,
Chapter 469. Because the City paying for 100% of the debt service with
TIF revenues from the West End project, the Bonds can be a G.O.
(general obligation), without a referendum and will not count against
the City’s debt limit.
The City currently carries a Moody’s rating of Aa1. The City could
explore a bond rating from Standard & Poor’s in addition to or instead
of a Moody’s rating.
Bank Qualification: Because of the large Park Nicollet bond issue this year, the City has
issuing more than $10,000,000 in the calendar year 2008. Therefore,
the Bonds will not be bank qualified. Park Nicollet has agreed to
Page 1
reimburse the City for any higher interest cost associated with a non-
bank qualified issue.
Term/Call Feature: The 2008A Bonds are to be repaid over a slightly more than 10 year
period. Interest is payable semi-annually, beginning August 1, 2009.
Principal on the 2008A Bonds will be due on August 1 in the years
2011 through 2020. The 2008A Bonds maturing August 1, 2017, and
thereafter will be subject to prepayment at the discretion of the City
on August 1, 2016.
The 2008B Bonds are to be repaid over a 15 year period including
two years capitalized interest through February 1, 2011. The
capitalized interest is necessary because the majority of construction
on the retail portion of the project will not be completed until the end
of 2009, with first full taxes paid in 2011. The development
agreement allows the City to issue a net of $4,500,000 in project costs
with a first lien on the TIF revenues plus an additional amount of debt
secured by the City’s 5% administrative fee. Principal on the 2008B
Bonds will be due on February 1 in the years 2012 through 2024. The
2008A Bonds maturing February 1, 2019, and thereafter will be
subject to prepayment at the discretion of the City on February 1,
2018.
Funding Sources: For the 2008A Bonds, it is the intent of the City to use utility revenues
support all of the debt service.
For the 2008B Bonds, the City anticipates that there will be tax
increment sufficient to pay for 105% of debt service. The development
agreement with Duke requires that the City anticipates 120% debt
service coverage of tax increments to debt service and that the minimum
assessment agreements have been signed. If the assessment agreements
are not signed prior to the date of sale, we may recommend that the City
delay the sale.
Discussion Issues: We do not see any refunding opportunities for other City debt. Ehlers
will continue to monitor the market and the call dates for the City and
alert you to any future opportunities.
Risk Factors: Anytime a City issues G.O. Tax Increment Bonds, there is a risk that
increments will be lower due to a change in legislation, the real estate
market, or construction schedules. The risk is reduced because of the
City’s first call on the TIF revenues, Duke’s standing in the real
estate market, and the minimum assessment agreements.
Arbitrage: With increasing short-term investment rates, IRS rules regarding the
amount of interest that the City may earn on bond proceeds is more of a
Page 2
concern. If the City spends the bond proceeds within 24 months
according to specific percentages each six months, interest earned on
the proceeds above the bond interest rate does not need to be rebated or
repaid interest (the excess interest earnings are known as arbitrage). The
City will also need to keep its debt service funds within IRS parameters
to avoid penalties on carrying too high of a balance during the life of the
issue.
Schedule: Pre-Sale Review by Council: October 20, 2008
Distribute Official Statement: November 7, 2008
Conference with Rating Agency: Week of November 10, 2008
Bond Sale and City Council meeting to
award:
November 17, 2008
Estimated Closing Date: On or about December 1,
2008
Attachments: Exhibit A: Series 2008A Bonds Sources and Uses and Debt Service
Estimates
Exhibit B: Series 2008B Bonds Sources and Uses and Debt Service
Estimates
Ehlers Contacts: Financial Advisors: Mark Ruff (651) 697-8505
Stacie Kvilvang (651) 697-8506
Bond Analysts: Diana Lockard (651) 697-8534
Debbie Holmes (651) 697-8536
Bond Sale Coordinator Connie Kuck (651) 697-8527
The Official Statement for this financing will be mailed to the home of each Council Member at
their home address for review prior to the sale date.
Page 3
St Louis Park, MN
$4,075,000 G.O. Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2008A
$4,000,000 Net Project Costs - 10 Year Term
Sources & Uses
Dated 12/01/2008 | Delivered 12/01/2008
Sources Of Funds
Par Amount of Bonds $4,075,000.00
Total Sources $4,075,000.00
Uses Of Funds
Total Underwriter's Discount (1.000%)40,750.00
Costs of Issuance 30,000.00
Deposit to Project Construction Fund 4,000,000.00
Rounding Amount 4,250.00
Total Uses $4,075,000.00
Ser 08 $4M GO utility 10 | SINGLE PURPOSE | 10/15/2008 | 8:42 AM
Ehlers & Associates
Public Finance Page 1
St Louis Park, MN
$4,075,000 G.O. Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2008A
$4,000,000 Net Project Costs - 10 Year Term
Debt Service Schedule
Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Fiscal Total
12/01/2008 -----
08/01/2009 --116,830.00 116,830.00 -
02/01/2010 --87,622.50 87,622.50 204,452.50
08/01/2010 --87,622.50 87,622.50 -
02/01/2011 --87,622.50 87,622.50 175,245.00
08/01/2011 335,000.00 3.900%87,622.50 422,622.50 -
02/01/2012 --81,090.00 81,090.00 503,712.50
08/01/2012 350,000.00 4.000%81,090.00 431,090.00 -
02/01/2013 --74,090.00 74,090.00 505,180.00
08/01/2013 365,000.00 4.100%74,090.00 439,090.00 -
02/01/2014 --66,607.50 66,607.50 505,697.50
08/01/2014 380,000.00 4.150%66,607.50 446,607.50 -
02/01/2015 --58,722.50 58,722.50 505,330.00
08/01/2015 395,000.00 4.200%58,722.50 453,722.50 -
02/01/2016 --50,427.50 50,427.50 504,150.00
08/01/2016 410,000.00 4.250%50,427.50 460,427.50 -
02/01/2017 --41,715.00 41,715.00 502,142.50
08/01/2017 430,000.00 4.300%41,715.00 471,715.00 -
02/01/2018 --32,470.00 32,470.00 504,185.00
08/01/2018 450,000.00 4.400%32,470.00 482,470.00 -
02/01/2019 --22,570.00 22,570.00 505,040.00
08/01/2019 470,000.00 4.600%22,570.00 492,570.00 -
02/01/2020 --11,760.00 11,760.00 504,330.00
08/01/2020 490,000.00 4.800%11,760.00 501,760.00 -
02/01/2021 ----501,760.00
Total $4,075,000.00 -$1,346,225.00 $5,421,225.00 -
Yield Statistics
Bond Year Dollars $30,616.67
Average Life 7.513 Years
Average Coupon 4.3970332%
Net Interest Cost (NIC)4.5301306%
True Interest Cost (TIC)4.5438821%
Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 4.3824342%
All Inclusive Cost (AIC)4.6641227%
IRS Form 8038
Net Interest Cost 4.3970332%
Weighted Average Maturity 7.513 Years
Ser 08 $4M GO utility 10 | SINGLE PURPOSE | 10/15/2008 | 8:42 AM
Ehlers & Associates
Public Finance Page 2
St Louis Park, MN
$5,625,000 G.O. Tax Increment Bonds, Series 2008B
$5,000,000 Net Project Costs - 15 Year Term
Capitalized Interest through 2/1/2011
Sources & Uses
Dated 12/01/2008 | Delivered 12/01/2008
Sources Of Funds
Par Amount of Bonds $5,625,000.00
Total Sources $5,625,000.00
Uses Of Funds
Total Underwriter's Discount (1.000%)56,250.00
Costs of Issuance 46,000.00
Deposit to Capitalized Interest (CIF) Fund 550,987.17
Deposit to Project Construction Fund 4,968,887.00
Rounding Amount 2,875.83
Total Uses $5,625,000.00
Ser 08 $5M GO TIF 15 Yrs | SINGLE PURPOSE | 10/15/2008 | 8:44 AM
Ehlers & Associates
Public Finance Page 1
St Louis Park, MN
$5,625,000 G.O. Tax Increment Bonds, Series 2008B
$5,000,000 Net Project Costs - 15 Year Term
Capitalized Interest through 2/1/2011
Net Debt Service Schedule
Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I CIF Net New D/S
Fiscal
Total
12/01/2008 -------
08/01/2009 -- 176,510.00 176,510.00 (176,510.00)--
02/01/2010 - - 132,382.50 132,382.50 (132,382.50)--
08/01/2010 - - 132,382.50 132,382.50 (132,382.50)--
02/01/2011 - - 132,382.50 132,382.50 (132,382.50)--
08/01/2011 - - 132,382.50 132,382.50 - 132,382.50 -
02/01/2012 330,000.00 4.100% 132,382.50 462,382.50 - 462,382.50 594,765.00
08/01/2012 - - 125,617.50 125,617.50 - 125,617.50 -
02/01/2013 345,000.00 4.150% 125,617.50 470,617.50 - 470,617.50 596,235.00
08/01/2013 - - 118,458.75 118,458.75 - 118,458.75 -
02/01/2014 355,000.00 4.200% 118,458.75 473,458.75 - 473,458.75 591,917.50
08/01/2014 - - 111,003.75 111,003.75 - 111,003.75 -
02/01/2015 375,000.00 4.250% 111,003.75 486,003.75 - 486,003.75 597,007.50
08/01/2015 - - 103,035.00 103,035.00 - 103,035.00 -
02/01/2016 390,000.00 4.300% 103,035.00 493,035.00 - 493,035.00 596,070.00
08/01/2016 - - 94,650.00 94,650.00 - 94,650.00 -
02/01/2017 405,000.00 4.400% 94,650.00 499,650.00 - 499,650.00 594,300.00
08/01/2017 - - 85,740.00 85,740.00 - 85,740.00 -
02/01/2018 425,000.00 4.600% 85,740.00 510,740.00 - 510,740.00 596,480.00
08/01/2018 - - 75,965.00 75,965.00 - 75,965.00 -
02/01/2019 440,000.00 4.800% 75,965.00 515,965.00 - 515,965.00 591,930.00
08/01/2019 - - 65,405.00 65,405.00 - 65,405.00 -
02/01/2020 465,000.00 4.900% 65,405.00 530,405.00 - 530,405.00 595,810.00
08/01/2020 - - 54,012.50 54,012.50 - 54,012.50 -
02/01/2021 485,000.00 5.000% 54,012.50 539,012.50 - 539,012.50 593,025.00
08/01/2021 - - 41,887.50 41,887.50 - 41,887.50 -
02/01/2022 510,000.00 5.100% 41,887.50 551,887.50 - 551,887.50 593,775.00
08/01/2022 - - 28,882.50 28,882.50 - 28,882.50 -
02/01/2023 535,000.00 5.200% 28,882.50 563,882.50 - 563,882.50 592,765.00
08/01/2023 - - 14,972.50 14,972.50 - 14,972.50 -
02/01/2024 565,000.00 5.300% 14,972.50 579,972.50 - 579,972.50 594,945.00
Total $5,625,000.00 -$2,677,682.50 $8,302,682.50 (573,657.50)$7,729,025.00 -
Ser 08 $5M GO TIF 15 Yrs | SINGLE PURPOSE | 10/15/2008 | 8:44 AM
Ehlers & Associates
Public Finance Page 2
St Louis Park, MN
$5,625,000 G.O. Tax Increment Bonds, Series 2008B
$5,000,000 Net Project Costs - 15 Year Term
Capitalized Interest through 2/1/2011
Debt Service Schedule Part 1 of 2
Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Fiscal Total
12/01/2008 -----
08/01/2009 --176,510.00 176,510.00 -
02/01/2010 --132,382.50 132,382.50 308,892.50
08/01/2010 --132,382.50 132,382.50 -
02/01/2011 --132,382.50 132,382.50 264,765.00
08/01/2011 --132,382.50 132,382.50 -
02/01/2012 330,000.00 4.100%132,382.50 462,382.50 594,765.00
08/01/2012 --125,617.50 125,617.50 -
02/01/2013 345,000.00 4.150%125,617.50 470,617.50 596,235.00
08/01/2013 --118,458.75 118,458.75 -
02/01/2014 355,000.00 4.200%118,458.75 473,458.75 591,917.50
08/01/2014 --111,003.75 111,003.75 -
02/01/2015 375,000.00 4.250%111,003.75 486,003.75 597,007.50
08/01/2015 --103,035.00 103,035.00 -
02/01/2016 390,000.00 4.300%103,035.00 493,035.00 596,070.00
08/01/2016 --94,650.00 94,650.00 -
02/01/2017 405,000.00 4.400%94,650.00 499,650.00 594,300.00
08/01/2017 --85,740.00 85,740.00 -
02/01/2018 425,000.00 4.600%85,740.00 510,740.00 596,480.00
08/01/2018 --75,965.00 75,965.00 -
02/01/2019 440,000.00 4.800%75,965.00 515,965.00 591,930.00
08/01/2019 --65,405.00 65,405.00 -
02/01/2020 465,000.00 4.900%65,405.00 530,405.00 595,810.00
08/01/2020 --54,012.50 54,012.50 -
02/01/2021 485,000.00 5.000%54,012.50 539,012.50 593,025.00
08/01/2021 --41,887.50 41,887.50 -
02/01/2022 510,000.00 5.100%41,887.50 551,887.50 593,775.00
08/01/2022 --28,882.50 28,882.50 -
02/01/2023 535,000.00 5.200%28,882.50 563,882.50 592,765.00
08/01/2023 --14,972.50 14,972.50 -
02/01/2024 565,000.00 5.300%14,972.50 579,972.50 594,945.00
Total $5,625,000.00 -$2,677,682.50 $8,302,682.50 -
Ser 08 $5M GO TIF 15 Yrs | SINGLE PURPOSE | 10/15/2008 | 8:44 AM
Ehlers & Associates
Public Finance Page 3
St Louis Park, MN
$5,625,000 G.O. Tax Increment Bonds, Series 2008B
$5,000,000 Net Project Costs - 15 Year Term
Capitalized Interest through 2/1/2011
Debt Service Schedule Part 2 of 2
Yield Statistics
Bond Year Dollars $55,057.50
Average Life 9.788 Years
Average Coupon 4.8634291%
Net Interest Cost (NIC)4.9655951%
True Interest Cost (TIC)4.9673332%
Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 4.8341576%
All Inclusive Cost (AIC)5.0775979%
IRS Form 8038
Net Interest Cost 4.8634291%
Weighted Average Maturity 9.788 Years
Ser 08 $5M GO TIF 15 Yrs | SINGLE PURPOSE | 10/15/2008 | 8:44 AM
Ehlers & Associates
Public Finance Page 4