Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008/04/28 - ADMIN - Agenda Packets - City Council - RegularAGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:30 P.M. APRIL 28, 2008 7:30 p.m. CITY COUNCIL MEETING – Council Chambers 1. Call to Order 1a. Pledge of Allegiance 1b. Roll Call 2. Presentations – None 3. Approval of Minutes 3a. City Council Minutes April 7 2008 3b. Special City Council Study Session Minutes April 7, 2008 3c. Closed Executive Session Minutes April 7, 2008 3d. City Council Study Session Minutes April 14, 2008 4. Approval of Agenda and Items on Consent Calendar NOTE: The Consent Calendar lists those items of business which are considered to be routine and/or which need no discussion. Consent items are acted upon by one motion. If discussion is desired by either a Councilmember or a member of the audience, that item may be moved to an appropriate section of the regular agenda for discussion. The items for the Consent Calendar are listed on the last page of the Agenda. Recommended Action: Motion to approve the agenda as presented and to approve items on the consent calendar. (Alternatively: Motion to add or remove items from the agenda, motion to move items from consent calendar to regular agenda for discussion and to approve those items remaining on the consent calendar.) 5. Boards and Commissions – None 6. Public Hearings 6a. Public Hearing Off-Sale Liquor License – The Four Firkins. Recommended Action: Mayor to close public hearing. Motion to approve off-sale intoxicating liquor license to The Four Firkins – Lagers, Ales and Wines, LLC, located at 8009 Minnetonka Boulevard for the license term of May 1, 2008 through March 1, 2009 Meeting of April 28, 2008 City Council Agenda 6b. Public Hearing and First Reading of Ordinance - West End Sewer Easement Vacation Recommended Action: Mayor to close public hearing. Motion to approve the first reading of an Ordinance approving the vacation of a portion of a Sewer Easement on Lot 4, Block 1, WEST END, and set the second reading of the proposed ordinance for May 5, 2008. 7. Requests, Petitions, and Communications from the Public 8. Resolutions, Ordinances, Motions and Discussion Items 8a. Project Report – Park Place Boulevard Improvements – Project No. 2007-1101 Recommended Action: Motion to Adopt Resolution accepting this report, establishing and ordering Improvement Project No. 2007-1101, approving plans and specifications, and authorizing advertisement for bids. 8b. “West End” - Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development Recommended Action: Motion to Adopt a Resolution approving a Final Plat for the WEST END addition with conditions as recommended by the Planning Commission and Staff. 8c. 2008-2010 Law Enforcement Labor Services (LELS) Local #220 – Public Safety Dispatchers Labor Agreement Recommended Action: Motion to Adopt the attached Resolution approving a Labor Agreement between the City and the Public Safety Dispatchers LELS Local #220, establishing terms and conditions of employment for three years, from 1/1/08 – 12/31/10. 8d. Advertising & Sponsorship Guidelines Recommended Action: Motion to Approve Adoption of the attached Advertising & Sponsorship Guidelines. 8e. Waiver of Cable Franchising Standstill Agreement for Aquila Commons Recommended Action: Motion to Approve Resolution authorizing a Waiver to the Standstill Agreement regarding Cable Television Franchise Compliance with Comcast at Aquila Commons. 9. Communication Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. To make arrangements, please call the Administration Department at 952/924-2525 (TDD 952/924-2518) at least 96 hours in advance of meeting. Meeting of April 28, 2008 City Council Agenda 4. CONSENT CALENDAR 4a. Approve a Financial Services Contract and Adopt a Resolution authorizing financial services to the City of St. Louis Park Housing Authority for a period of two years. 4b. Designate Midwest Asphalt Corporation the lowest responsible bidder and authorize execution of contract with the firm in the amount of $1,348,674.24 for Local Street Rehabilitation Project – Area 4, Project No. 2007-1000. 4c. Authorize execution of a contract with KLM Engineering Inc. (KLM) for engineering services related to Water Project – EWT #4 – Project 2007-1500. 4d. Authorize execution of a contract with BARR Engineering Company for engineering services related to the development of a new Surface Water Management Plan for the City 4e. Approve Amendment No. 2 to Contract 134-07 which provides additional engineering consulting services for design of the Park Place Boulevard Reconstruction Project – Project No. 2007-1101. 4f. Approve Amendment No. 2 to Contract 89-06 providing additional engineering services for the CSAH 25 Ped Bridge Project, Project No. 2005-2100. 4g. Approve Amendment No. 1 to Contract No. 77-07 providing additional engineering services for the West End Development Project. 4h. Approve a Stormwater Maintenance Agreement with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) for Street Project: Park Place Boulevard Reconstruction - Project 2007- 1101. 4i. Adopt Resolution authorizing the execution and delivery of Amended and Restated Bond Trust Indentures, Amended and Restated Loan Agreements, and other documents related to the delivery of a new liquidity facility and additional credit enhancement in connection with the City’s Health Care Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds (Park Nicollet Health Services) Series 2007A and Health Care Facilities Revenue Bonds (Park Nicollet Health Services), Series 2007B. 4j. Appoint C. Paul Carver to the I-394 Travel Demand Management Task Force. 4k. Approve Encroachment Agreement with BFW and Associates, LLC, for use of easement for a retaining wall at 7525 Wayzata Boulevard. 4l. Approve for Filing of Housing Authority Minutes January 9, 2008 4m. Approve for Filing of Housing Authority Minutes March 9, 2008 4n. Approve for filing of Planning Commission Minutes March 19, 2008 4o. Approve for filing Planning Commission Minutes April 2, 2008 4p. Approve of filing of Vendor Claims St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority and regular City Council meetings are carried live on Civic TV cable channel 17 and replays are frequent; check www.parktv.org for the schedule. The meetings are also streamed live on the internet at www.parktv.org, and saved for Video on Demand replays. The agenda is posted on Fridays on the official city bulletin board in the lobby of City Hall and on the text display on Civic TV cable channel 17. The agenda and full packet are available by noon on Friday on the city’s website. Meeting Date: April 28, 2008 Agenda Item #: 3a UNOFFICIAL MINUTES CITY COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 7, 2008 1. Call to Order Mayor Jacobs called the meeting to order at 7:31 p.m. Councilmembers present: Mayor Jeff Jacobs, John Basill, C. Paul Carver, Phil Finkelstein, Paul Omodt, Loran Paprocki and Susan Sanger. Councilmembers absent: None Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), City Attorney (Mr. Scott), Economic Development Coordinator (Mr. Hunt), Assistant Zoning Administrator (Mr. Morrison), Community Development Director (Mr. Locke), Planning & Zoning Supervisor (Ms. McMonigal), Engineering Project Manager (Mr. Olson) and Recording Secretary (Ms. Schmidt). 2. Presentations 2a. Honoring Judge Allen Oleisky Proclamation Mayor Jacobs presented Judge Allen Oleisky with an appreciation plaque and read proclamation declaring April 7, 2008 as Allen Oleisky Day. Mayor Jacob thanked Judge Oleisky for his 36 years of distinguished service as judge in the Fourth Judicial District of Hennepin County and his important involvement with the City of St. Louis Park. 2b. Volunteer Week Proclamation Mayor Jacobs recognized St. Louis Park volunteers and read proclamation declaring April 27 – May 3, 2008 as National Volunteer Week. Mayor Jacobs thanked the hundreds of volunteers for their donation of over 15,000 volunteer hours given for the betterment of the community. 3. Approval of Minutes 3a. Special Study Session Minutes March 17, 2008 The minutes were approved as presented. 3b. City Council Minutes March 17, 2008 It was noted on page three, item #6a, the third paragraph, should state: “…happy to see the property owners agreement with the neighbors that three lots are too many.” The minutes were approved as amended. Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item 3a) Page 2 Subject: City Council Minutes April 7, 2008 3c. Study Session Minutes March 24, 2008 It was noted on page one, item #2, the fifth paragraph, should state: “Councilmember Paprocki suggested that the Commission look at how north/south traffic patterns may change in response to new light rail stations.” It was noted on page two, item #3, the third paragraph, add a sentence stating: “Both Councilmember Finkelstein and Councilmember Basill were concerned with the proposed streetscape only having one lane of traffic each way, with a middle change lane, stating they felt that would not work and wanted both the City and County to explore having two lanes in each direction.” The minutes were approved as amended. 4. Approval of Agenda and Items on Consent Calendar NOTE: The Consent Calendar lists those items of business which are considered to be routine and/or which need no discussion. Consent items are acted upon by one motion. If discussion is desired by either a Councilmember or a member of the audience, that item may be moved to an appropriate section of the regular agenda for discussion. 4a. Adopt second reading of Ordinance No. 2352-08 for Vacation of a Portion of a Drainage and Utility Easement at 2535 and 2545 Huntington Avenue. 4b. Adopt Resolution No. 08-047, directing the City to enter into an agency agreement with the Minnesota Department of Transportation relating to a grant awarded to the City by Transit for Livable Communities. 4c. Approve Change Order No. 5 to Contract 15-07 – Sanitary Sewer Project – Shelard Lift Station (LS) #18 and Force Main (FM) - City Project No. 2005-1200. 4d. Approve Authorization Cooperative Agreement for Leasing Fire Department Breathing Apparatus. 4e. Adopt Resolution No. 08-048 approving Redevelopment Contract with Lake Street Office Center LLC (Real Estate Recycling). 4f. Approve for filing of Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission Minutes February 20, 2008. 4g. Approve for filing of Planning Commission Minutes March 5, 2008. 4h. Approve of filing of Vendor Claims. It was moved by Councilmember Finkelstein, seconded by Councilmember Carver, to approve the Agenda and items listed on the Consent Calendar. The motion passed 7-0. 5. Boards and Commissions - None Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item 3a) Page 3 Subject: City Council Minutes April 7, 2008 6. Public Hearings 6a. Public Hearing regarding the Modification of the Tax Increment Plan for the Victoria Ponds Tax Increment Financing District. Resolution No. 08-049 No speakers present. Mayor Jacobs closed the public hearing. It was moved by Councilmember Paprocki, seconded by Councilmember Basill, to approve Resolution No. 08-049, approving the proposed Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project No. 1 and the proposed Modification to the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Victoria Ponds Tax Increment Financing District. The motion passed 7-0. 7. Requests, Petitions, and Communications from the Public – None 8. Resolutions, Ordinances, Motions and Discussion Items 8a. Request for preliminary plat approval with variances for Isabelle Estates located at 8550 Minnetonka Blvd. Resolution No. 08-050 and 08-051 Mr. Morrison presented the staff report. Hadley Kohn, 8724 Minnetonka Blvd. stated he is representing his elderly parents who were concerned with the noise, requesting that the existing trees remain to alleviate sound and allow for privacy. He further asked that the existing fence remain and stated concern with traffic with the addition of another driveway, supporting only three houses versus the four requested houses. Councilmember Omodt asked if the trees slated to be removed and if so, were they subject to the tree replacement plan. Mr. Morrison stated they were subject to tree placement; however staff does not have a plan in place yet because it would depend on the house placement. Councilmember Paprocki asked if the City had any control with tree placement. Mr. Morrison stated not really, they could simply make suggestions. Councilmember Omodt asked if the developer had any room for allowable adjustments. Mr. Peter Knaeble, Terra Engineering/applicant, stated they estimate four or five trees would need to be removed. He went on to state that he could not guarantee anything, as it would depend upon the builder’s house plan. Mr. Knaeble stated they did change the back setback in order to save those trees. Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item 3a) Page 4 Subject: City Council Minutes April 7, 2008 Councilmember Sanger stated she was against the entire proposal because she would not support the demolition of the oldest house and only remaining barn in St. Louis Park. She felt it was important to retain the structures to preserve the historical continuity of community. Councilmember Sanger stated she did tour the house and grounds and was informed by Mr. Knaeble if somebody wanted to buy the house and/or barn he would attempt to accommodate them. Councilmember Sanger stated this would be an example of what St. Louis Park was like. She further stated that she was in agreement with staff to deny the variance request for the elimination of the sidewalk. Councilmember Paprocki asked a rough timeframe for interested parties to contact Mr. Knaeble. Mr. Morrison stated if the plat was approved today as is, it would require the removal all three structures, but roughly a couple of months. Councilmember Paprocki asked what the construction noise policy was. Mr. Morrison stated 7 a.m. – 10 p.m. and later on weekends. Councilmember Paprocki stated they could encourage the builder to plant more trees, but they could not require them to do so. He further stated he felt this project was a good opportunity for move-up housing. Councilmember Finkelstein asked if the white fence was going to be removed. Mr. Knaeble stated he would not remove it and that it would be up to the builder. Mr. Knaeble further stated it is their best intentions to keep as many trees as possible, as well as the fence. He also stated that they were open to restricting construction operation to between the hours of 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. Sunday through Saturday. Councilmember Basill asked Mr. Knaeble if he were willing to replace the trees removed with more mature trees, suggesting a certain diameter to provide more of a buffer. Mr. Knaeble stated he was agreeable with the City’s requirement, focusing replacement on the west side of the lot. Councilmember Basill asked if there was any way to add a requirement in the motion requirement. Mr. Morrison stated he was uncertain until the building permit came through. Mr. Harmening suggested adding a condition when the final plat approval request was presented. Ms. McMonigal suggested stating to replace the screening on the west side of the property to an equivalent screening. Mr. Scott suggested adding any additional language at this time. Mayor Jacobs expressed this wasn’t the time to establish variance details and that it should be brought back at its appropriate time. Councilmember Omodt asked about the historical preservation of the buildings. Mr. Knaeble stated they were open to suggestions and they were currently actively marketing to keep the house in place. Councilmember Omodt asked if he was open to preserving parts of it rather than demolishing them. Mr. Knaeble stated he was very open to the idea and had invited the St. Louis Park Historical Society to visit the property. Councilmember Sanger stated the house had a lot of potential. Councilmember Carver wanted to clarify that if the proposal went through, the likeliness of a builder saving the fence would be slim. He suggested Mr. Knaeble take into light the neighbor’s concerns. Councilmember Carver also stated he has a proponent of move-up Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item 3a) Page 5 Subject: City Council Minutes April 7, 2008 housing, stating it was a shame that trees could be saved at the back of the lot, but not on the side. He further stated he was torn on which way to vote, since voting for the proposal would likely be the demise of the trees. Councilmember Finkelstein stated he was in support of the proposal, as it would be a great opportunity for move-up housing. He also suggested that Mr. Knaeble take Councilmember Carver’s advice, stating that good developers make good neighbors. Councilmember Finkelstein further stated by adding the conditions of operation and sidewalk, he would be supporting it. Councilmember Basill asked if once the variance was approved, would Council have the ability to make buffer requirements. Mr. Scott suggested making those requirements now, stating they may not have any additional information once a final plat was presented, unless a builder was already in place with plans. It was moved by Councilmember Paprocki, seconded by Councilmember Basill, to adopt Resolution No. 08-050, approving the preliminary plat of Isabelle Estates with a lot width variance to allow a reduction in the amount of the lot that must meet the 75 foot minimum width; restricting work operation to the hours of 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. Sunday through Saturday; priority requirement that replacement of trees focus on providing screening on western border. The motion passed 5-2. Councilmember Carver and Sanger opposed. It was moved by Councilmember Omodt, seconded by Councilmember Paprocki, to adopt Resolution No. 08-051, denying a variance request for elimination of the requirement to install a sidewalk along Aquila Avenue. The motion passed 7-0. 8b. Project Report: 2008 MSA Street Improvement Project #2007-1100. Resolution No. 08-052 Mr. Olson presented the staff report. Councilmember Sanger asked if the work on 16th Street would be coordinated with the Park Place redo and when that would be done. She also asked if they would need to close the road to traffic or if traffic would be rotated while working on it. Mr. Olson stated the work on 16th Street would likely occur in the spring 2009 and during the work it would be constructed under traffic. Councilmember Omodt asked why the construction would be during Rec Center peak hour and why the City wouldn’t wait until the pool closes at the end of the season. Mr. Olson stated the construction timing, stating contractor’s workload at the end of the season is at its peak and may impact pricing. He further stated that Park and Rec requested construction begin after Parktacular. Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item 3a) Page 6 Subject: City Council Minutes April 7, 2008 Councilmember Finkelstein asked if a right turn lane would be added at the corner of Park Center Blvd and Monterrey Avenue. Mr. Olson stated he was unaware of any right hand turn lane. Councilmember Basill stated he would advise the neighborhood groups at the Elmwood and Creekside meetings later this week. It was moved by Councilmember Basill, seconded by Councilmember Omodt, to adopt Resolution No.08-052, accepting this report, establishing and ordering Improvement Project No. 2007-1100, approving plans and specifications, and authorizing advertisement for bids. The motion passed 7-0. 8c. Adjourn to a Closed Door/Executive Session to discuss with the City Attorney pending/ongoing litigation with Pawn America. 8d. Adjourn to a Closed Door/Executive Session to discuss with the City Attorney pending/threatened litigation with ARINC. 9. Communications Mayor Jacobs reminded everyone of the Belgian Waffle Dinner at the Lennox Center on Friday, April 11, 2008. He also stated the Carin Youth Event May 15th at the Rec Center at 7:00 p.m. Mayor Jacobs stated that Excelsior Blvd would be closed April 14th for a couple of weeks due to railroad construction. And, as a final note, Mayor Jacobs wished to send his condolences to the family of Paul Reuben, a former St. Louis Park Police Officer, who was killed in Iraq. 10. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 8:42 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Nancy Stroth, City Clerk Jeff Jacobs, Mayor Meeting Date: April 28, 2008 Agenda Item #: 3b UNOFFICIAL MINUTES SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION APRIL 7, 2008 The meeting convened at 6:45 p.m. Councilmembers present: Mayor Jeff Jacobs, John Basill, C. Paul Carver, Phil Finkelstein, Paul Omodt and Loran Paprocki. Sue Sanger arrived at 6:47 p.m. Councilmembers absent: None Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), City Attorney (Mr. Scott), Communications Coordinator (Mr. Zwilling) and Recording Secretary (Ms. Schmidt). Guest: None 1. Advertising and Sponsorship Guidelines Mr. Zwilling presented the staff report. Council and staff had discussion on the advertising policy, its sponsorship guidelines, wordage and ad regulation options. Council requested staff provide more clarity on allowable sponsorship and stipulations for the businesses that provide alcohol services. Councilmember Basill asked if the City needed to have a policy in effect. Mr. Scott stated the City should have some type of policy in effect to provide limited public forum. Councilmember Sanger stated her concern with selling ads and felt they should be paid for by tax dollars, allowing for City regulation on their content. She further stated that the image created by the sponsored ads would not allow the City to have control over wordage and suggested that private ads and/or links to commercial enterprise not be allowed. It was the Consensus of Council to proceed forward with the policy with the discretion’s suggested by Council. Mr. Harmening stated that by partnering with CityImage to publish the City handbook, it would save the City approximately $30,000. Mr. Zwilling explained that CityImage was willing to publish the publication at their expense. Mr. Zwilling further stated that the handbook production would be paid for by the sale of ads. Council was in agreement that partnering with CityImage would be beneficial to the City. The meeting adjourned at 7:09 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Nancy Stroth, City Clerk Jeff Jacobs, Mayor Meeting Date: April 28, 2008 Agenda Item #: 3c UNOFFICIAL MINUTES CITY COUNCIL CLOSED EXECUTIVE SESSION APRIL 7, 2008 1. Roll Call Mayor Jacobs called the meeting to order at 8:40 p.m. Councilmembers present: Mayor Jeff Jacobs, John Basill, C. Paul Carver, Phillip Finkelstein, Sue Sanger, Paul Omodt, and Loran Paprocki. Councilmembers absent: None Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), Community Development Director (Mr. Locke) Others present: City Attorney (Mr. Scott). 2. Update on pending/ongoing litigation with Pawn America City Attorney Tom Scott provided an update in a Closed Executive Session on the pending/ongoing litigation with Pawn America. 3. Update on pending/threatened litigation with ARINC. City Attorney Tom Scott provided an update in a Closed Executive Session on the pending/threatened litigation with ARINC. 4. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 9:10 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Nancy Stroth, City Clerk Jeff Jacobs, Mayor Meeting Date: April 28, 2008 Agenda Item #: 3d UNOFFICIAL MINUTES CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION APRIL 14, 2008 The meeting convened at 6:30 p.m. Councilmembers present: Mayor Jeff Jacobs, John Basill, C. Paul Carver, Phil Finkelstein, Loran Paprocki, and Sue Sanger Councilmembers absent: Paul Omodt Telecommunications Advisory Commissioners present: Chair Bruce Browning, Rick Dworsky, David Dyer, Dale Hartman, Robert Jacobson, and Toby Keeler Parks and Recreation Advisory Commissioners present: Chair Steve Hallfin Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), Director of Park and Recreation (Ms. Walsh), Community Development Director (Mr. Locke), Police Chief (Mr. Luse), Deputy Chief (Mr. DiLorenzo), Planning/Zoning Supervisor (Ms. McMonigal), Community TV Coordinator (Mr. McHugh), Civic TV Coordinator (Mr. Dunlap), and Recording Secretary (Ms. Hughes). Guest: Mike McGarvey, SRF Consulting, Inc. 1. Future Study Session Agenda Planning – April 28, 2008 Mr. Harmening reported there will not be a Council meeting on April 21, 2008, in observance of Passover. He stated there will be a Study Session on April 28, 2008, followed by a brief EDA meeting, the annual organizational meeting of the Board of Appeals and Equalization, and the regular City Council meeting. He indicated at the Study Session, staff intends to update the Council regarding the water tower painting project and the vision strategic direction. 2. Telecommunications Advisory Commission 2007 Annual Report 2008 Work Plan Chair Browning presented the 2007 Telecommunications Advisory Commission annual report and 2008 work plan. He stated the Commission has expressed a desire to be more involved in the decision-making process with respect to WiFi and has at times felt out of the loop with the Council. The Council discussed wireless options available to the City including WiFi, WiMax, and DSL service. Councilmember Finkelstein stated it would be helpful to evaluate the Minneapolis model and see if it is possible for the City to tie into the Minneapolis system. Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item 3d) Page 2 Subject: Study Session Minutes April 14, 2008 It was the consensus of Council to direct staff to prepare a draft fiber optic ordinance for consideration by the Council and to schedule a study session to discuss the ordinance. Commissioner Dworsky requested that staff provide the Commission with information regarding the number of single family/multi-family homes and businesses in the City, as well as information regarding building permits. Mr. McHugh stated several Commissioners previously expressed an interest in pursuing a plan whereby the City has community hot spots available. It was the consensus of Council to direct staff to work with the Telecommunications Advisory Commission on community hot spots. It was also the consensus of Council to direct staff to provide written reports and updates, including costs, from the Telecommunications Advisory Commission to the Council. 3. Parks and Recreation Commission 2007 Annual Report 2008 Goals Chair Hallfin presented the 2007 Park and Recreation Advisory Commission annual report and 2008 goals. Councilmember Sanger requested the Commission consider ways for the parks to be used more frequently for non-competitive sports, e.g., yoga classes in the parks. In addition, she requested the Commission give consideration to using organic fertilizer in the parks and finding other ways of being more eco-friendly to the environment. Chair Hallfin reported that the Park and Recreation Advisory Commission is currently short one member (the school board representative). He asked the Council to make a recommendation to the school board for a replacement in order to fill the vacancy. 4. Proposed Ordinance Amendment to Chapter 4, Article III Concerning Dogs Chief Luse presented the proposed ordinance amending the City Code concerning dogs, dangerous dogs, and potentially dangerous dogs. He stated that a question was earlier raised regarding whether the City should ban certain dogs by breed; he recommended the City not impose this ban and added the proposed ordinance provides a mechanism for removing and possibly destroying a dangerous dog. Councilmember Carver expressed concern about the definition of an at-large dog and the twenty- foot leash length contained in the ordinance and stated he would prefer to see the definition of control refined in the ordinance. Council and staff discussed the general dog regulations, dangerous dog regulations, and potentially dangerous dog regulations, and the definition of control and substantial bodily harm. Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item 3d) Page 3 Subject: Study Session Minutes April 14, 2008 It was the consensus of Council that written comments regarding the ordinance should be submitted to the City Attorney. Discussion took place regarding the leash length and other definitions of control. Deputy Chief DiLorenzo stated there is currently a bill going through the House and Senate which imposes more restrictions on who can own a dangerous dog and increases the insurance requirement from $50,000 to $300,000. He stated he will work with the City Attorney to draft the ordinance to match the language contained in this bill. 5. 36th Street Streetscape and Public Art Ms. McMonigal presented the staff report regarding the 36th Street Streetscape and public art projects. Mr. McGarvey presented graphic depictions of the plans for 36th Street streetscaping Mayor Jacobs asked if LED lights would be utilized since they are less expensive to operate. Mr. McGarvey agreed to research whether LED lights could be used. Ms. Walsh presented several drawings of the art to be placed along the corridor by Marjorie Pitz and the “Dream Elevator” to be placed on the southeast corner of Wooddale and 36th Street by Randy Walker. Councilmember Basill suggested having the neighborhood representative attend a future meeting and to let residents know there was significant neighborhood involvement in the project, as well as involvement by Friends of the Arts. Council and staff discussed the proposed use of the building on the VIP II site for senior housing, as well as traffic and parking in the area. 6. Communications (verbal) Mr. Harmening stated the I-394 Golden Valley/St. Louis Park Joint Powers Task Force will be convening in the near future to discuss the west end project. He stated the task force has traditionally been staffed by the councilmembers of Ward One (Councilmember Sanger) and Ward Four (Councilmember Carver). He stated the Council will need to appoint the members who will sit on the task force. Mr. Harmening reported that staff has been informed by Pawn America that the pool and spa building has been pulled off the market. Mayor Jacobs directed staff to schedule a closed executive session to discuss this matter. Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item 3d) Page 4 Subject: Study Session Minutes April 14, 2008 Mr. Harmening stated that a joint meeting with the School Board has been scheduled for Tuesday, May 6. He stated further details regarding the meeting will be forthcoming and added that possible agenda items could include the school levy referendum, financial condition in general, and Eliot School. He requested the Council provide him with other agenda items. Councilmember Carver stated he did not feel the meeting should include a discussion regarding Eliot School. He suggested the meeting include an inter-organizational development exercise. Council and staff discussed the meeting with the School Board and the need to have the meeting facilitated by a third party in order to assist with brainstorming and assignment of tasks and accountability. The meeting adjourned at 9:03 p.m. Written Reports provided and documented for recording purposes only: 7. Paint the Park Pilot Program 8. Proposed Redevelopment of Santorini’s Restaurant Parcel 9. Proposed Redevelopment of 3340 Republic Avenue ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Nancy Stroth, City Clerk Jeff Jacobs, Mayor Meeting Date: April 28, 2008 Agenda Item #: 4a Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance Presentation Other: EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other: Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other: TITLE: Financial Services Contract and Resolution for St. Louis Park Housing Authority. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Approve a Financial Services Contract and Adopt a Resolution authorizing the City of St. Louis Park to provide financial services to the City of St. Louis Park Housing Authority for a period of two years. POLICY CONSIDERATION: None. BACKGROUND: The City’s Finance staff has provided all financial management responsibilities to the Housing Authority since 1999. Prior to each contract renewal, the agreement is reviewed and modified to accurately reflect the scope of the services provided by the Finance Department. Over the years, many positive changes have occurred which have strengthened the relationship. The City and Housing Authority are working on new initiatives to enhance financial reporting and internal controls. We have worked together to develop a two year agreement for the City to continue to provide financial services to the Housing Authority. Through this joint effort, the efficient and cost effective procurement of financial services maximizes the resources that are available to provide quality housing for the residents of St. Louis Park. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The proposed fee for the City to provide financial services to the Housing Authority is $46,911 for the period of April 1, 2008 to March 31, 2009 (FY 2009) and $48,318 for the period of April 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010 (FY 2010). Fiscal Year 2009 reflects a 0% increase based on Housing Authority staff performing more preliminary financial steps. Fiscal Year 2010 reflects an increase of 3% due to anticipated salary increases. Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4a) Page 2 Subject: Financial Services Contract and Resolution for St. Louis Park Housing Authority VISION CONSIDERATION: Providing financial services to the Housing Authority is consistent with the City’s vision of providing a well maintained and diverse housing stock. Attachments: Resolution Financial Services Contract Prepared by: Brian A. Swanson, Assistant Finance Director Reviewed by: Bruce DeJong, Finance Director Michele Schnitker, Housing Supervisor Kevin Locke, Community Development Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4a) Page 3 Subject: Financial Services Contract and Resolution for St. Louis Park Housing Authority RESOLUTION NO. 08-_____ RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK FINANCE DEPARTMENT AND THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK HOUSING AUTHORITY AUTHORIZING THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT TO PROVIDE FINANCIAL SERVICES WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park has received a report and contract pertaining to the Finance Department of the City providing financial services to the Housing Authority. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT, by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, that: 1. The two year agreement for the City to provide financial services to the Housing Authority is hereby accepted. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council April 28, 2008 City Manager Mayor Attest: City Clerk Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4a) Page 4 Subject: Financial Services Contract and Resolution for St. Louis Park Housing Authority CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK AND ST. LOUIS PARK HOUSING AUTHORITY FINANCIAL SERVICES CONTRACT THIS AGREEMENT by and between the City of St. Louis Park and the St. Louis Park Housing Authority. RECITALS • The City and the Housing Authority recognize the importance of interagency support and aid; It is in the best interest of both parties for the Finance Department of the City to assume responsibility for the Housing Authority's financial management for the following reasons: The City has a Finance Department with an accounting division whose staff members provide financial management to the City and thus have demonstrated expertise in financial matters; and The City recognizes the Housing Authority's limited resources to obtain quality services for these functions through a contractual agreement with a third party or through hiring their own staff. Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4a) Page 5 Subject: Financial Services Contract and Resolution for St. Louis Park Housing Authority The parties agree as follows: 1. Services. The City will provide to the Housing Authority the services described in Exhibit "A" hereto. 2. Compensation for Services. For services provided from April 1, 2008 to March 31, 2009, the Housing Authority will pay to the City, Forty-six Thousand Nine Hundred Eleven and No/100ths ($46,911.00) Dollars. For services provided from April 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010, the Housing Authority will pay to the City, Forty-eight Thousand Three Hundred Eighteen and No/100ths ($48,318.00) Dollars. The annual amount will be billed to the Housing Authority on a monthly basis. 3. Other expenses. The City of St. Louis Park Finance Department is responsible for providing training, mileage reimbursement, and equipment necessary to appropriate staff while providing services to the Housing Authority. The Housing Authority will only participate in cost sharing of training expenditures for Finance staff when training is initiated and/or approved by the Housing Authority. 4. Staffing. The City of St. Louis Park Finance Department is responsible for ensuring that staff possesses the expertise, knowledge and skill to provide the services as required in the contract. The City of St. Louis Park will provide a primary contact person to the St. Louis Park Housing Authority. This person is designated as the lead person for all matters relating to the financial management of the Housing Authority. The Housing Authority understands that other staff members in the Finance Department will perform some duties in order to provide for the appropriate segregation of duties. Direct supervision of the tasks performed by the Finance Department staff will be provided by the Director of Finance or Assistant Finance Director. Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4a) Page 6 Subject: Financial Services Contract and Resolution for St. Louis Park Housing Authority 5. Independent Contractor. At all times and for all purposes herein, the City of St. Louis Park is an independent contractor, and not an employee of the St. Louis Park Housing Authority. No statement herein shall be construed to find the employees of the City as employees of the Housing Authority. 6. Term. The term of this Agreement will be from April 1, 2008 through March 31, 2010 or until either party provides advance written notice of 90 days specifying the intent to cancel the Agreement. CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK By: ______________________________ Thomas Harmening City Manager ST. LOUIS PARK HOUSING AUTHORITY By: _______________________________ Catherine Courtney Chairperson By: ________________________________ Kevin Locke Executive Director Attest_____________________________ Renee Fitzgerald, Secretary Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4a) Page 7 Subject: Financial Services Contract and Resolution for St. Louis Park Housing Authority Exhibit A Services to be provided by the City of St. Louis Park Finance Department to the St. Louis Park Housing Authority GENERAL PURPOSE To provide sound and accurate financial systems for Housing Authority accounting and budgeting purposes. In addition, maintain current financial records ensuring the financial integrity of the agency and compliance with regulations. TYPICAL AND REGULAR FINANCIAL SERVICES ACTIVITIES 1. Invest funds of the Authority, following HUD and State on Minnesota regulations. 2. Balance all checking and investment accounts on a monthly basis. 3. Maintain financial records for the agency; monitors budgets. Provide monthly reports to the Housing Authority, monthly summaries to the Board and quarterly reports to the Finance Director. 4. Make inter-fund transfers and maintain records of bank statements, funds transfers, and escrow accounts. 5. Prepare bank deposits in accordance with Housing Authority policies. 6. Maintain accurate, up-to-date systems for accounts payable and claims. 7. Receive rent and other payments and maintain Tenant Accounts Receivable register. 8. Keep cash and checks secure until deposited. 9. Maintain fixed asset records. 10. Calculate PILOT payment and prepare claim for payment to Hennepin County in April. Calculation is 5% of sheltered rents, (rents less utilities). 11. Prepare and print all checks in accordance with agency and HUD policies and procedures (does not include Section 8 HAP checks). 12. Provide monitoring and reporting services for all agency budgets including Public Housing, Section 8, Capital Fund Program, Shelter Plus Care, Family Self-Sufficiency and all other budgets that may occur during the course of the year. 13. Prepare and distribute tax data and send out annual information: CRP to tenants Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4a) Page 8 Subject: Financial Services Contract and Resolution for St. Louis Park Housing Authority 1099 to landlords – Section 8 is the HA’s responsibility 1099 to vendors – Accounting function 1096 summary to federal government – Accounting function (includes landlord and vendor 1099s) 14. Work in conjunction with the Housing Authority to maintain information on Section 8 and Public Housing escrow accounts by individual. 15. Track all Section 8 Billings for portability in and provide updated worksheets on outstanding amounts. 16. Prepare month-end close and related reports: All journal entries including distribution of Authority salaries and benefits. Financial statements for all programs: Public Housing Capital Fund Program Section 8 Shelter Plus Care Family Self-Sufficiency General Fund ROSS DHAP 17. Other functions as necessary: Request LOCCS disbursements and provide updated obligated/expended data -Capital Fund Program - Public Housing and Section 8 Operating Funds - Shelter Plus Care - ROSS 18. Prepare HUD required year-end reports: - REAC Unaudited Submission - REAC Audited Submission - Form 52681B – Voucher Management Report (quarterly) - Others as necessary 19. Prepare audit work papers and perform year-end closing procedures. Meeting Date: April 28, 2008 Agenda Item #: 4b Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance Presentation Other: EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other: Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other: TITLE: Bid Tabulation: Local Street Rehabilitation Project – Area 4, Project No. 2007-1000. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to designate Midwest Asphalt Corporation the lowest responsible bidder and authorize execution of contract with the firm in the amount of $1,348,674.24 for Local Street Rehabilitation Project – Area 4, Project No. 2007-1000. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. BACKGROUND: Bid Information: Bids were received on April 8, 2008 for Local Street Rehabilitation Project – Area 4. This is the fourth year of the City’s Pavement Management Program. Work for this year’s program will occur on selected streets in the Bronx Park, Birchwood, and Sorenson Neighborhoods. The work includes replacing the old pavement with a new asphalt surface. Other work associated with the project includes drainage system repairs. A total of seven (7) bids were received for this project. An advertisement for bids was published in the St. Louis Park Sun-Sailor on March 20, and 27, 2008 and in the Construction Bulletin on March 24, and 31, 2008. A summary of the bid results is as follows: CONTRACTOR BID AMOUNT Midwest Asphalt Corporation $1,348,674.24 Valley Paving, Inc. $1,355,394.51 Northwest Asphalt, Inc.* $1,368,479.24 Hardrives, Inc. * $1,384,281.31 Thomas and Sons $1,406,522.15 C.S. McCrossan Construction, Inc. $1,492,735.00 Bituminous Roadways, Inc. $1,500,421.30 Engineer’s Estimate $1,846,023.20 *Bid corrected upon extension Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4b) Page 2 Subject: Bid Tabulation: Local Street Rehab Area 4 – Project No. 2007-1000 Evaluation of Bids: Staff has reviewed all of the bids submitted and has tabulated the results. From the review, staff recommends Midwest Asphalt Corporation as the lowest responsible bidder. Midwest Asphalt is a reputable contractor that has worked for the city before and has successfully completed contracts. Construction Timeline: Construction is planned to begin in late-May and should be completed by mid-August. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The Pavement Management Fund will provide approximately $1,139,000 for the street work. Utility funds will provide approximately $210,000 for work associated with the storm sewer and water systems. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. Attachments: None Prepared by: Jim Olson, Engineering Project Manager Reviewed by: Scott Brink, City Engineer Michael P. Rardin, Director of Public Works Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Meeting Date: April 28, 2008 Agenda Item #: 4c Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance Presentation Other: EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other: Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other: TITLE: Approve consulting services for Water Project - Recoat Elevated Water Tower No. 4, 2541 Nevada Avenue - Project 2007-1500. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to authorize execution of a contract with KLM Engineering Inc. (KLM) for engineering services related to Water Project – EWT #4 – Project 2007-1500. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Not Applicable. BACKGROUND: The current 5-year CIP includes Project 2007-1500, which is the rehabilitation of Elevated Water Tower No. 4 (EWT #4) located at 2541 Nevada Avenue S. In 1955, the City constructed EWT #4. This 1 million gallon riveted double ellipsoid tower is now more than 50+ years old and in need of rehabilitation. In 2007, the City hired KLM to conduct a complete inspection of both the exterior and interior of the tower. The inspection showed that some structural modifications and repairs are required for both the exterior and interior to bring the EWT #4 into compliance with OSHA regulations, American Water Works Association (AWWA) standards, allow for safer access in and on the tank and, in some cases, removing unnecessary items. The inspection also showed that the exterior coating is now failing and is no longer providing adequate protection against corrosion. The exterior coating of steel water storage towers has a life expectancy of 15 to 20 years; this tower was last coated in 1986. The interior inspection revealed the tank requires a complete new interior coating. The age of the existing interior coal tar epoxy coating is approximately 30+ years old, with spot repairs last done in 1991. Today’s protective coating systems are designed to last 15-20 years. Another key component of the project will be the coordination with the four (4) telecommunication companies with antennas and related equipment on the tower. The antennas and related equipment will need to be removed and replaced or protected in-place during the tower rehabilitation. These telecommunication related engineering costs will be included in KLM’s contract and charged back by the City to the respective telecommunication companies. The engineering services that are needed for this project include the following: design services, preparation of construction plans and specifications, construction management and inspection services, and provide telecommunication facilities coordination and plan review. Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4c) Page 2 Subject: Approve Contract with KLM, Elevated Water Tower – 2541 Nevada Ave., Project 2007-1500 Several consulting firms could assist the city with this project, however staff is recommending KLM be hired for the following reasons: • Vast amount of experience with similar projects • Successful management of past tower project for the City of St. Louis Park - completing the Reservoir No. 1 (29th & Idaho) recoating project in 2007 • Successful managing of similar projects in recent years in surrounding metro cities • Vast understanding of project from conducting the tower inspection in 2007 • Past involvement (plan review and construction inspection) with antenna communication projects on SLP water towers KLM submitted a proposal dated April 18, 2008 listing the tasks and estimated costs as follows: # Task Cost 1 Design Services , Prepare Plans & Specifications $ 7,000.00 2 Construction Management Services $ 22,400.00 3 Construction Inspection Services $ 53,544.00 4 Subtotal (City Costs) $ 82,944.00 5 Telecommunication Coordination, Plan Review, Construction Observation (Telecommunication Companies Cost) * $ 20,000.00 6 Total Project Cost $102,944.00 * This amount will be paid to the Contractor by the City, with costs being reimbursed to the City from the four (4) telecommunication companies. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: In summary, it is proposed that the City hire KLM for the engineering services and related tasks as described above. The source of funding for this project is the Water Utility. The following terms will be incorporated into this contract: 1. Work is scheduled to begin in September 2008 and be completed by June 2009 2. Compensation is based on actual work performed with a maximum contract amount of $102,944.00. 3. KLM has independent contractor status. 4. City may terminate this contract with seven (7) days notice The document utilized for this contract is the City’s standard professional services agreement developed by the City Attorney. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not Applicable. Attachments: None Prepared By: Scott Merkley, Public Works Coordinator Reviewed By: Mike Rardin, Director of Public Works Approved By: Tom Harmening, City Manager Meeting Date: April 28, 2008 Agenda Item #: 4d Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance Presentation Other: EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other: Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other: TITLE: Approve Consulting Services for Surface Water Management Planning. RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: Motion to authorize execution of a contract with BARR Engineering Company for engineering services related to the development of a new Surface Water Management Plan for the City POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish to allow staff to retain professional services to develop a Surface Water Management Plan as required by law? BACKGROUND: In 2001, the City adopted a Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan. This plan was developed to meet watershed management planning requirements of the Metropolitan Surface Water Management Act. It was also developed to be in conformance with the requirements of local watershed management organizations, Hennepin County programs, Metropolitan Council requirements, Hennepin Conservation District guidelines and applicable State and Federal laws. Cities are required to update their surface water management plans within 2 years of the date that a watershed management organization within the city adopts a new surface water management plan. The Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission completed its Second Generation Watershed Management Plan in September 2004. At that time, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District was working on its Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan, which they eventually adopted in July 2007. Now that both watershed management organizations have completed their plans, the City is now ready to revise its plan to meet the new requirements as required by the State. An updated Surface Water Management Plan is a required element of the Comprehensive Plan update. It is also an important element of the city’s land use and development planning, especially with regards to future redevelopment efforts. Staff received proposals from three (3) qualified firms to provide professional services for updating our plan. After a thorough review of the proposals, Public Works and Community Development staffs are recommending that BARR Engineering Company (BARR) be utilized to provide these services. Barr’s proposal provides for drafting the revised surface water management plan, bringing the plan through the review and approval process with all applicable agencies, and then finalizing the plan and providing documentation. Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4d) Page 2 Subject: Approve Consulting Services for Surface Water Management Planning FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The fee for the services proposed to be provided by BARR is $79,900. This will be paid from the Development Fund. The Development Fund is being used to pay for the cost of updating the City’s Comprehensive Plan VISION CONSIDERATION: Revision of the Surface Water Management Plan will consider and accomplish the following Vision- related goal: Environment: Will continue promote good stewardship of the City’s water resources. Attachments: None Prepared by: Laura Adler, Engineering Program Coordinator Reviewed by: Scott A. Brink, City Engineer Michael P. Rardin, Director of Public Works Kevin Locke, Community Development Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Meeting Date: April 28, 2008 Agenda Item #: 4e Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance Presentation Other: EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other: Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other: TITLE: Amend Consultant Contract 134-07 – Street Project: Park Place Boulevard Reconstruction - Project No. 2007-1101. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Approve Amendment No. 2 to Contract 134-07 which provides additional engineering consulting services for design of the Park Place Boulevard Reconstruction Project – Project No. 2007-1101. POLICY CONSIDERATION: None. BACKGROUND: History and Recent Activities On November 5, 2007, the City Council authorized approval of a contract with SRF Consulting Group, Inc. (SRF) to provide design services for the reconstruction of Park Place Boulevard from Cedar Lake Road to Wayzata Boulevard. The contract was subsequently amended on January 7, 2008 as a result of additional services required to assist in preparing plans and specifications for the roadway. The additional services at that time essentially included additional time and effort needed to alter street elevations and grades to better match the West End Development plans which were being further refined at the time. This also required adjustments to the existing underground utilities such as sanitary sewer, water, and storm sewer. SRF has rapidly moved ahead toward completion of the plans and specifications in order to accommodate the Developer’s desired schedule for opening of the West End Development in the fall of 2009. This has therefore accelerated the public process that the City follows for projects of this nature. Since January, several meetings and communications with many stakeholders have occurred, including Duke Construction, neighboring property owners, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed, Mn/DOT, Metro Transit, the cities of St. Louis Park and Golden Valley, surrounding businesses and residents, and others. As a result of the amount of input and requests received in a relatively short time frame, SRF has needed to expend additional hours to meet the project schedule. This has also included additional work tasks not anticipated when the original contract was developed. Generally, the additional time and work tasks requested as part of this Amendment No. 2 can be summarized as follows: Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4e) Page 2 Subject: Amend Consultant Contract 134-07 – Park Place Boulevard - Project No. 2007-1101 Additional Professional Services A. Additional Meetings and Requests of Other Agencies: 1. Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) - Because Park Place Boulevard intersects with Wayzata Boulevard and the I-394 ramps; Mn/DOT has requested additional traffic modeling and analysis. They have also required the preparation of an Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE), which essentially documents that traffic and safety for a particular intersection has been adequately addressed. Mn/DOT has also provided review and comment on the plans themselves, and SRF is addressing those comments on behalf of the City. 2. Metro Transit – SRF, the City, and Duke Construction have all been working extensively with Metro Transit to address transit needs for both the West End Development and Park Place Boulevard. This not only includes meeting the future transit needs for Park Place Boulevard and the West End Development itself, but also for temporary transit detour routing and accommodations of existing routes while construction of Park Place Boulevard is occurring. 3. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) – The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District has taken a special interest in the West End Development site by working with the Developer to progressively implement newer green and environmentally friendly features with regards to stormwater management and water quality. These initiatives have also been carried over to Park Place Boulevard, but to a lesser extent because of the limited space and right of way available. Nevertheless, this has resulted in additional time and design coordination efforts with MCWD. B. Easements and Additional Meetings With Property Owners The Park Place Boulevard Roadway and Streetscape project does require the acquisition of both permanent and temporary easements from most properties within the corridor. The extent of the easements needed was not known until actual design of the improvements could be completed to a sufficient stage. Thus, the City and SRF have both been engaged in continuous meetings with abutting property owners. For example at Doubletree Hotel, the new roadway and trail construction will result in some lost parking for the hotel. We have therefore been assisting them to mitigate the losses by working to make adjustments to the parking lot as part of the plans. As a result of the extensive amount of private property impacts, SRF has also prepared easement legal descriptions and exhibits to assist the City in the development of appropriate documents. These services were not included within their original scope. Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4e) Page 3 Subject: Amend Consultant Contract 134-07 – Park Place Boulevard - Project No. 2007-1101 C. Additional Work Added to Project The City’s Capital Improvement Plan (C.I.P.) included a mill and overlay for 16th Street from Park Place Boulevard to Zarthan Avenue. It has been determined that from a timing, coordination, and cost effectiveness standpoint, it would be more appropriate to include this work as part of the Park Place Boulevard reconstruction package. The 16th Street work also involves replacements of the traffic loop detectors and modifications to the traffic signage and pavement markings. This additional work has therefore incurred additional time for SRF. Despite the additional work required to complete the Park Place Boulevard Design, the project schedule does remain on track to provide for a bid letting that will allow for construction to commence as early as mid-June of this year. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Estimated Contract Cost A letter of amendment from SRF dated April 17, 2008 estimates the cost for this additional work at $55,868. All work performed under this contract is paid for on a time and materials basis. The source of funding for this work/project, as identified in the City’s five year CIP, will come from Developer, Tax Increment, and Municipal State Aid funds. The professional services cost for Contract 134-07 with SRF is now estimated as follows: Original Contract $215,038 Amendment No. 1 $ 34,883 Amendment No. 2 $ 55,868 Total $305,789 Professional services approved under this contract are for design services for the roadway and trail. Design of the streetscape amenities is being performed under a separate contract. It is expected that upon advertisement and opening of bids for construction, authorization for a separate contract for construction services will be requested. Contract Terms Contract terms remain unchanged except as follows: 1. Scope is amended to include the additional engineering services outlined in the SRF proposal dated April 17, 2008. 2. Compensation is based on actual work performed with a maximum contract amount of $305,789. The document utilized for this contract is the City’s standard professional services agreement developed by the City Attorney. Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4e) Page 4 Subject: Amend Consultant Contract 134-07 – Park Place Boulevard - Project No. 2007-1101 VISION CONSIDERATION: Design of the Park Place Boulevard Improvement will consider and accomplish the following Vision related goals: Sidewalks and Trails and Transportation: 1. Will provide improved safety and facilities for pedestrians and bicycles. 2. Will provide stronger links to destinations, including gathering centers and transit facilities. Attachments: Amendment No. 2 Prepared By: Scott Brink, City Engineer Reviewed By: Michael P. Rardin, Director of Public Works Kevin Locke, Director of Community Development Approved By: Tom Harmening, City Manager Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4e) Page 5 Subject: Amend Consultant Contract 134-07 – Park Place Boulevard - Project No. 2007-1101 AMENDMENT NO 2. CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK CONSULTING SERVICES CONTRACT NO. 134-07 THIS AGREEMENT is made on April 28, 2008, by and between the CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK, Minnesota, a Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as “City”), and SRF Consulting Group, Inc., a Minnesota corporation (hereinafter referred to as “SRF”). 1. BACKGROUND: The parties have previously entered into an agreement for consulting services dated November 5, 2007 (“Initial Agreement”). The Initial Agreement authorizes SRF to provide engineering consulting services for Project 2007-1101 at a cost not to exceed $215,038. Amendment 1 was subsequently authorized by the City Council on January 7, 2008 to revise the contract amount to $249,921. 2. ITEM NO. 1: SCOPE OF SERVICES: This paragraph shall be amended to include the additional engineering services outlined in the SRF proposal letter dated April 17, 2008. 3. ITEM NO. 2: COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES: Subject to the modifications set forth herein, the not to exceed compensation amount shall increase by $55,868 to $305,789. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their respective duly authorized officers. EXECUTED as to the day and year first above written. SRF CONSULTING GROUP, INC. CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK By:________________________________ By:________________________________ Jeff Jacobs, Mayor Title:_______________________________ and________________________________ Thomas Harmening, City Manager Meeting Date: April 28, 2008 Agenda Item #: 4f Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance Presentation Other: EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other: Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other: TITLE: Amend Consultant Contract 89-06 CSAH 25 Ped Bridge Project - Project 2005-2100. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Approve Amendment No. 2 to Contract 89-06 providing additional engineering services for the CSAH 25 Ped Bridge Project, Project No. 2005-2100. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Not Applicable. BACKGROUND: History and Recent Activities The City Council approved a contract on May 1, 2006 with TKDA in the amount of $187,700 for design and construction services related to the CSAH 25 Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge and connecting trails. On September 17, 2007, Amendment No. 1 to the contract was approved by Council increasing the contract amount by $20,300 to cover additional services not covered in the original contract. Construction was completed late last fall and the bridge was opened to the public. Some miscellaneous restoration and touch-up work remains to be completed before final payment to the contractor can be made. This work is expected to be completed in late May to early June. Additional Professional Services TKDA has notified the City they expect to exceed their authorized contract amount prior to completion of the project and staff is therefore requesting Council approve an increase in the contract to provide for project oversight through project completion. This additional cost is related to the number of hours the TKDA field inspector and project manager have expended and will need to expend to finalize project activities. This is due primarily to the amount of time (working days) that the Contractor used to construct the bridge. The Contractor exceeded the number of working days specified in the contract in completing the project, thus increasing TKDA’s time on the project. The Contractor may be assessed liquidated damages as a result of the increased construction time – this is currently being discussed and evaluated by TKDA and staff. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Estimated Contract Cost TKDA estimates the cost for this additional work at $19,000. All work performed under this contract is paid for on a time and materials basis. Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4f) Page 2 Subject: Amend Contract 89-06 CSAH 25 Ped Bridge Project - Project 2005-2100 The professional services cost for Contract 89-06 with TKDA is now estimated as follows: Original Contract $187,700 Amendment No. 1 $20,300 Amendment No. 2 $19,000 Total $227,000 The funding for this work is included as a part of the CSAH 25 Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge project previously approved by Council. With this amendment, TKDA’s total fees (for design and construction services) will amount to approximately 16% of the final construction contract. On a percentage basis, this is well within the amounts typically paid for professional services on similar projects. Contract Terms Contract terms will remain unchanged except as follows: 1. All services shall be completed by June 14, 2008 2. Compensation is based on actual work performed with a maximum contract amount of $227,000 VISION CONSIDERATION: Not Applicable. Attachments: Amendment No. 2 to Contract No. 89-06 Prepared by: Scott Brink, City Engineer Reviewed by: Michael P. Rardin, Director of Public Works Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4f) Page 3 Subject: Amend Contract 89-06 CSAH 25 Ped Bridge Project - Project 2005-2100 CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO CONTRACT NO. 89-06 THIS AMENDMENT NO. 2 to Contract No. 89-06 is made on April 28, 2008, between the CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK, a Minnesota municipal corporation hereinafter referred to as “CITY” and TKDA Engineers, hereinafter referred to as “TKDA”. BACKGROUND. The parties have previously entered into an agreement for consulting services dated May 1, 2006 (“Initial Agreement”). The Initial Agreement authorizes TKDA to provide engineering consulting services for Project 2005-2100 at a cost not to exceed $187,700. Amendment 1 was subsequently authorized by the City Council on September 17, 2007 which increased the contract amount to $208,000. Due to protracted construction, additional engineering services are required to oversee the final stages of this construction project. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above facts and mutual covenants herein contained, it is hereby agreed that Contract No. 89-06 is amended as follows: 1. All services to be performed under Contract No. 89-06 shall be completed by June 14, 2008. 3. The total compensation to TKDA for all services rendered pursuant to Contract No. 89-06, as amended, is increased by $19,000 with a not to exceed total contract cost of $227,000. IT IS FURTHER AGREED that all other provisions of Contract No. 89-06 shall remain unchanged and fully effective, and this Amendment shall become an integral part thereof. EXECUTED as to the day and year first above written. TKDA CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK By:________________________________ By:________________________________ Jeff Jacobs, Mayor Title:_______________________________ and________________________________ Thomas Harmening, City Manager Meeting Date: April 28, 2008 Agenda Item #: 4g Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance Presentation Other: EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other: Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other: TITLE: Amend Consultant Contract No. 77-07 West End Development Project. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to approve Amendment No. 1 to Contract No. 77-07 providing additional engineering services for the West End Development Project. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Not Applicable. BACKGROUND: History and Recent Activities On June 27, 2007, an agreement for professional services was entered into by the City and TKDA. The purpose of the agreement was to provide plan review assistance to the City for the public infrastructure portion of the West End Development project. This generally entails streets and utilities for the 16th Street extension (Park Place Boulevard to Utica Avenue), Utica Avenue (Wayzata Boulevard to Gamble Drive), overall site drainage and stormwater management, and other portions of the West End site where public utilities will ultimately be constructed. The contract amount of these services per the agreement was $3,500. Additional Services Construction of at least some of these improvements (Phase 1A - retail) is now underway by Duke Construction. Construction coordination, management, and observation of the public infrastructure improvements require significant additional time and effort by staff, and the Developer is proceeding on a very fast track. More notably, during the actual construction of the utilities and the streets themselves, nearly a full time presence on the City’s part is needed to assure that the improvements are completed in a satisfactory manner, and that the developer’s contractor is receiving the responsiveness required of the City while navigating through the process. There are not sufficient staff resources in the Engineering Division to provide this oversight and at the same time oversee other capital projects being undertaken this year. As a result, additional services from TKDA are being requested at this time to meet these additional needs. TKDA has provided a Supplemental Agreement letter dated March 28, 2008 that details the services they will be providing on the City’s behalf. These services include the following: 1. Provide a Resident Project Representative at the site to assist the City and to provide more continuous observation of the Contractor’s work. This will include attending pre- construction and weekly construction meetings at the site. Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4g) Page 2 Subject: Amend Contract 77-07 West End Development Project 2. Serve as liaison with the Contractor, working principally through the Developer’s field representative and Contractor’s Superintendent. 3. Provide additional plan reviews as required, including change orders and review of record drawings submitted by the Developer. It is also expected that revised infrastructure plans may soon be submitted for the office (east) portion of the West End Project, including Utica Avenue which will require additional review services. In summary, the engineering plan review and construction services to be provided by TKDA would cover streets and utilities for the complete West End Development. This includes the Phase 1A portion now under construction, and the eventual infrastructure improvements for the office (east) portion of the Wet End site. Streetscape amenities are being covered by a separate agreement with the Developer. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Estimated Contract Cost The letter of amendment from TKDA dated March 28, 2008 estimates the cost for this additional work at $60,000. All work performed under this contract is paid for on a time and materials basis. This amount will be paid by the Developer in accordance with the terms of the Development Agreement. The professional services cost for Contract 77-07 with TKDA is now estimated as follows: Original Contract $3,500 Amendment No. 1 $60,000 Total $63,500 Because the agreement is intended to cover the entire West End site through completion of all public improvements, it is expected that TKDA’s services will be utilized on an “as-needed” basis as phases and specific stages of construction arise. The termination date for TKDA’s services is therefore proposed at this time to be January 1, 2010 to cover at least two construction seasons. Contract Terms Contract terms remain unchanged except as follows: 1. Scope is amended to include the additional engineering services outlined in the TKDA proposal dated March 28, 2008 2. All services shall be completed by January 1, 2010 3. Compensation is based on actual work performed with a maximum contract amount of $63,500 The document utilized for this contract is the City’s standard professional services agreement developed by the City Attorney. Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4g) Page 3 Subject: Amend Contract 77-07 West End Development Project VISION CONSIDERATION: Not Applicable Attachments: Amendment No. 1 to Contract No. 77-07 Prepared by: Scott Brink, City Engineer Reviewed by: Michael P. Rardin, Director of Public Works Kevin Locke, Director of Community Development Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4g) Page 4 Subject: Amend Contract 77-07 West End Development Project CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO CONTRACT NO. 77-07 THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 to Contract No. 77-07 is made on April 28, 2008, between the CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK, a Minnesota municipal corporation hereinafter referred to as “CITY” and TKDA Engineers, hereinafter referred to as “TKDA”. BACKGROUND. On June 27, 2007, the City and TKDA entered into Contract No. 77- 07 for professional services for the West End Development Project. Progression of the project into the construction phase and the need for construction services and further plan reviews has necessitated the need for further services from TKDA. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above facts and mutual covenants herein contained, it is hereby agreed that Contract No. 77-07 is amended as follows: 1. The scope of work shall be amended to include the additional engineering services outlined in the TKDA letter dated March 28, 2008. 2. All services to be performed under Contract No. 77-07 shall be completed by January 1, 2010. 3. The total compensation to TKDA for all services rendered pursuant to Contract No. 77-07 as amended, is increased by $60,000 with a not to exceed total contract cost of $63,500. IT IS FURTHER AGREED that all other provisions of Contract No. 77-07 shall remain unchanged and fully effective, and this Amendment shall become an integral part thereof. EXECUTED as to the day and year first above written. TKDA CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK By:________________________________ By:________________________________ Jeff Jacobs, Mayor Title:_______________________________ and________________________________ Thomas Harmening, City Manager Meeting Date: April 28, 2008 Agenda Item #: 4h Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance Presentation Other: EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other: Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other: TITLE: Approve a Stormwater Maintenance Agreement for Street Project: Park Place Boulevard Reconstruction - Project 2007-1101. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Approve a Stormwater Maintenance Agreement with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) for Street Project: Park Place Boulevard Reconstruction - Project 2007-1101. POLICY CONSIDERATION: None. BACKGROUND: Plans have been completed for the reconstruction of Park Place Boulevard from Gamble Drive to Wayzata Boulevard (City Project 2007-1101). These plans will be presented to the City Council for approval as an action item at the April 28, 2008 City Council meeting. A permit is required and has been obtained from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) for this project. As a condition of the permit approval, MCWD is requiring that the City enter into an Agreement that provides for the long term maintenance of the stormwater infrastructure related to this improvement, namely the storm sewer system and two grit chambers. The agreement drafted by MCWD (attached) is consistent with similar agreements approved previously for other projects in the City. RECOMMENDATION: The attached Stormwater Maintenance Agreement between the City and MCWD includes provisions that are consistent with the policies and procedures that are already a part of the City’s Comprehensive Stormwater Plan. The City Attorney has reviewed the Agreement and does not have any objections or further comments. Staff recommends approval of the attached Maintenance Agreement. VISION CONSIDERATION: None. Attachments: Maintenance Agreement Prepared by: Scott Brink, City Engineer Reviewed by: Mike Rardin, Director of Public Works Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4h) Page 2 Subject: Maintenance Agreement MCWD Park Place Boulevard Reconstruction – Project No. 2007-1101 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Stormwater Management Facilities Between the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and the City of St. Louis Park for Reconstruction of Park Place Boulevard This Stormwater Management Facilities Maintenance Agreement (“Agreement”) is made by and between the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, a watershed district with purposes and powers set forth at Minnesota Statutes Chapters 103B and 103D (“MCWD”), and the City of St. Louis Park, a home rule charter city of the State of Minnesota (“St. Louis Park”), for purposes of St. Louis Park’s Park Place Boulevard Reconstruction (“Project”). Recitals and Statement of Purpose WHEREAS pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §103D.345, the MCWD has adopted and implements Rule N, Stormwater Management; WHEREAS under Rule N, certain land development activity requires a landowner to record a declaration or similar instrument establishing the landowner’s obligation in perpetuity to inspect and maintain stormwater management facilities; WHEREAS in each case, a public landowner, as an alternative to a recorded instrument, may document its obligations in an unrecorded written agreement with the MCWD; WHEREAS St. Louis Park desires to undertake the Project, and has applied to the MCWD for a permit under Rule N and other Rules of the MCWD; WHEREAS on April 14, 2008, the MCWD approved Permit 08-061 for the Project, subject to St. Louis Park’s execution and fulfillment of the terms of this Agreement; THEREFORE IT IS AGREED as follows: 1. St. Louis Park will comply with the following maintenance provisions for the stormwater management facilities for the Project, as shown on the site plan attached to and incorporated into this Agreement as Attachment A, according to the terms of permit 08-061 and this Agreement: a. St. Louis Park will inspect grit chambers each spring, summer and fall. Accumulated sediment and debris will be removed so that the facilities will continue to operate as designed. Erosion impairing the function or integrity of the facilities, if any, will be corrected, and any structural damage or impairing or threatening to impair the function of the facilities will be repaired. Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4h) Page 3 Subject: Maintenance Agreement MCWD Park Place Boulevard Reconstruction – Project No. 2007-1101 b. St. Louis Park will submit to the MCWD annually a brief written report that describes the maintenance activities performed under this Agreement, including dates, locations of inspection and maintenance activities performed. 2. St. Louis Park is solely responsible for all costs of completion of the maintenance requirements described in paragraph 1 of this Agreement. 3. This Agreement may be amended only in a writing signed by the parties. 4. This Agreement is in force for five years from the date on which it is fully executed and will renew automatically for five-year terms unless terminated by written agreement of the parties. 5. The recitals are incorporated as a part of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement. MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT By ___________________________________ Date: _______________ President, Board of Managers APPROVED AS TO FORM and EXECUTION By ___________________________________ Date: _______________ Its Attorney CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK By: _______________________________ Date: _______________ APPROVED AS TO FORM and EXECUTION By ___________________________________ Date: _______________ Its Attorney Meeting Date: April 28, 2008 Agenda Item #: 4i Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance Presentation Other: EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other: Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other: TITLE: Resolution Modifying Letter of Credit – 2007 Park Nicollet Bonds. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution authorizing the execution and delivery of Amended and Restated Bond Trust Indentures, Amended and Restated Loan Agreements, and other documents related to the delivery of a new liquidity facility and additional credit enhancement in connection with the City’s Health Care Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds (Park Nicollet Health Services) Series 2007A and Health Care Facilities Revenue Bonds (Park Nicollet Health Services), Series 2007B. POLICY CONSIDERATION: None. BACKGROUND: Park Nicollet asked the City to issue tax-exempt revenue bonds in 2007. Repayment of these bonds is solely the responsibility of Park Nicollet Health Systems and the city has no liability if Park Nicollet is unable to repay the money. In order to get the lowest interest rate, the bonds were insured to get an AAA rating through a company called Ambac. Because of concerns related to the subprime mortgage crisis and Collateralized Debt Obligation (CDO) issues, Ambac’s AAA rating is in jeopardy. This resolution, prepared by the City’s bond counsel Kennedy & Graven, is designed to address the changes in the bond market’s confidence in Ambac. Because the bonds issued for Park Nicollet are variable rate demand notes (VRDN’s) they are auctioned many times per year. The note holders bid interest rates that they are willing to pay for each block of bonds. Because these notes are only held for a short period of time, the interest rates are at the bottom of the yield curve which generally saves Park Nicollet money rather than having to pay interest rates based on a 30 year maturity. When Ambac’s troubles surfaced, Park Nicollet suffered a period where no buyers bid on their variable rate debt instruments. This caused the bond interest rate to automatically go to a default level of 15%. While this did not last for long, this event was exceedingly costly for Park Nicollet, without any change in their underlying credit status. By having a letter of credit issued by Wells Fargo, Park Nicollet bidders should have confidence in their AAA status for any future auctions thus avoiding the specter of no bidders and default interest rates. Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4i) Page 2 Subject: Resolution Modifying Letter of Credit – 2007 Park Nicollet Bonds FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: This will have no effect on the city’s financial position. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. Attachments: Resolution Prepared by: Bruce DeJong, Finance Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4i) Page 3 Subject: Resolution Modifying Letter of Credit – 2007 Park Nicollet Bonds CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 08-_____ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF AMENDED AND RESTATED BOND TRUST INDENTURES, AMENDED AND RESTATED LOAN AGREEMENTS, AND OTHER DOCUMENTS RELATED TO THE DELIVERY OF A NEW LIQUIDITY FACILITY AND ADDITIONAL CREDIT ENHANCEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH THE CITY’S HEALTH CARE FACILITIES REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS (PARK NICOLLET HEALTH SERVICES), SERIES 2007A AND HEALTH CARE FACILITIES REVENUE BONDS (PARK NICOLLET HEALTH SERVICES), SERIES 2007B WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota (the “City”), is a municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Minnesota. WHEREAS, at the request of Park Nicollet Health Services, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation, Park Nicollet Methodist Hospital, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation, Park Nicollet Institute, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation, Park Nicollet Clinic, a Minnesota association that has elected to be treated as a nonprofit corporation, PNMC Holdings, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation, and Park Nicollet Health Care Products, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation (collectively, the “Obligated Group”), the City previously issued its Health Care Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds (Park Nicollet Health Services), Series 2007A, in the original aggregate principal amount of $41,600,000 (the “Series 2007A Bonds”). The proceeds of the Series 2007A Bonds were applied to the redemption and prepayment of the Health Care Facilities Revenue Bonds (Park Nicollet Health Services), Series 2003B, issued in the original aggregate principal amount of $41,550,000 (the “Prior Bonds”) and the payment of the costs of issuance of the Series 2007A Bonds. The proceeds of the Prior Bonds were used to finance (A) the construction and equipping of the Obligated Group’s Heart and Vascular Center at Park Nicollet Methodist Hospital located at 6500 Excelsior Boulevard in the City of St. Louis Park, the construction of a parking ramp and other improvements at Park Nicollet Methodist Hospital, the construction of public infrastructure improvements with respect to the foregoing, and the acquisition and installation of equipment for Park Nicollet Methodist Hospital, and (B) the acquisition and installation of (1) a computed tomography scanner (“CT Scanner”) at the facilities of the Obligated Group located at 1400 Fairview Drive in the City of Burnsville, Minnesota, (2) a CT Scanner at the facilities of the Obligated Group located at 15800 95th Avenue North in the City of Maple Grove, Minnesota, and (3) a CT Scanner and a magnetic resonance imaging scanner (“MRI Scanner”) at the facilities of the Obligated Group located at 250 North Central Avenue in the City of Wayzata, Minnesota, and to pay related costs of issuing the bonds. Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4i) Page 4 Subject: Resolution Modifying Letter of Credit – 2007 Park Nicollet Bonds WHEREAS, at the request of the Obligated Group, the City also previously issued its Health Care Facilities Revenue Bonds (Park Nicollet Health Services), Series 2007B-1, in an original aggregate principal amount of $56,595,000 (the “Series 2007B-1 Bonds”), and its Health Care Facilities Revenue Bonds (Park Nicollet Health Services), Series 2007B-2, in an original aggregate principal amount of $44,575,000 (the “Series 2007B-2 Bonds,” and collectively with the Series 2007B-1 Bonds, the “Series 2007B Bonds”). The proceeds of the Series 2007B Bonds were used to finance a portion of the capital costs of all or a portion of the following improvements: (i) the acquisition, construction, and equipping of an approximately 82,000 square foot building which will house the Obligated Group’s Cancer Center and related facilities with approximately 31,000 square feet of the building reserved for future expansion, to be located at 6490 Excelsior Boulevard in the City, (ii) the acquisition, construction, and equipping of a new parking ramp which will include approximately 1,700 parking stalls adjacent to the Cancer Center, (iii) the redesign and renovation of the emergency center at Methodist Hospital located at 6500 Excelsior Boulevard in the City, (iv) construction and equipping of a new common entrance to Methodist Hospital, the Meadowbrook Building, and the new Cancer Center, and (v) the acquisition, construction, and equipping of an approximately 69,000 square foot Eating Disorders Institute, including a parking ramp and surface lot with an estimated 220 parking stalls, to be located at 3515 Belt Line Boulevard in the City, all operated by Members of the Obligated Group and located in the City. Proceeds of the Series 2007B Bonds were also used to finance the payment of a premium for the bond insurance securing the Series 2007B Bonds, payment of interest on the Series 2007B Bonds during construction (or the required payments under a swap agreement entered into in relation to the Series 2007B Bonds), and the payment of the costs of issuance of the Series 2007B Bonds. WHEREAS, subsequent to the initial issuance of the Series 2007A Bonds and the Series 2007B Bonds (collectively, the “Bonds”), events occurred in the municipal bond market for Ambac-insured bonds that have led the Obligated Group to seek additional credit support and alternative liquidity support for the Bonds. At the request of the Obligated Group, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the “Letter of Credit Bank”), has agreed to issue its irrevocable, direct-pay letter of credit (the “Series 2007A Original Letter of Credit”) pursuant to the terms of a Reimbursement Agreement, dated on or after May 1, 2008 (the “Series 2007A Reimbursement Agreement”), among the Obligated Group and the Letter of Credit Bank, to secure the payment of the principal of, interest on, and Purchase Price of the Series 2007A Bonds and to act as a Liquidity Facility with respect to the Series 2007A Bonds. The Letter of Credit Bank has also agreed to issue its irrevocable, direct-pay letter of credit (the “Series 2007B Original Letter of Credit”) pursuant to the terms of a Reimbursement Agreement, dated on or after May 1, 2008 (the “Series 2007B Reimbursement Agreement”), among the Obligated Group and the Letter of Credit Bank, to secure the payment of the principal of, interest on, and Purchase Price of the Series 2007B Bonds and to act as a Liquidity Facility with respect to the Series 2007B Bonds. Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4i) Page 5 Subject: Resolution Modifying Letter of Credit – 2007 Park Nicollet Bonds WHEREAS, in order to obtain the additional credit support and alternative liquidity support for the Bonds, certain documents executed in conjunction with the issuance of the Bonds must be amended. Therefore, the Obligated Group has requested that the City execute and deliver the following documents: (i) an Amended and Restated Bond Trust Indenture, dated on or after May 1, 2008 (the “Series 2007A Amended Bond Indenture”), between the City and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (the “Bond Trustee”); (ii) an Amended and Restated Loan Agreement, dated on or after May 1, 2008 (the “Series 2007A Amended Loan Agreement”), between the City and the Obligated Group; (iii) an Amended and Restated Bond Trust Indenture, dated on or after May 1, 2008 (the “Series 2007B Amended Bond Indenture,” and collectively with the Series 2007A Amended Bond Indenture, the “Amended Bond Indentures”), between the City and the Bond Trustee; (iv) an Amended and Restated Loan Agreement, dated on or after May 1, 2008 (the “Series 2007B Amended Loan Agreement,” and collectively with the Series 2007A Amended Loan Agreement, the “Amended Loan Agreements”), between the City and the Obligated Group. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, as follows: 1. That the Amended Bond Indentures and the Amended Loan Agreements are hereby approved in substantially the forms on file with the City on the date hereof. 2. That the City Council of the City hereby authorizes and directs the Mayor and the City Manager to execute and deliver the Amended Bond Indentures, and to deliver to the Bond Trustee the Amended Bond Indentures. All of the provisions of the Amended Bond Indentures, when executed as authorized herein, shall be deemed to be a part of this resolution as fully and to the same extent as if incorporated verbatim herein and shall be in full force and effect from the date of execution and delivery thereof. The Amended Bond Indentures shall be substantially in the form on file with the City, which is hereby approved, with such necessary and appropriate variations, omissions and insertions as do not materially change the substance thereof, or as the Mayor and the City Manager, in their discretion, shall determine, and the execution and delivery thereof by the Mayor and the City Manager shall be conclusive evidence of such determination. 3 That the Mayor and the City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver the Amended Loan Agreements. All of the provisions of the Amended Loan Agreements, when executed and delivered as authorized herein, shall be deemed to be a part of this resolution as fully and to the same extent as if incorporated verbatim herein and shall be in full force and effect from the date of execution and delivery thereof. The Amended Loan Agreements shall be substantially in the forms on file with the City which are hereby approved, with such omissions and insertions as do not materially change the substance thereof, or as the Mayor and the City Manager, in their discretion, shall determine, and the execution thereof by the Mayor and the City Manager shall be conclusive evidence of such determination. Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4i) Page 6 Subject: Resolution Modifying Letter of Credit – 2007 Park Nicollet Bonds 4. That the City hereby approves the execution and delivery by the Bond Trustee of the Amended Bond Indentures and all other instruments, certificates, and documents prepared in conjunction with the remarketing of the Bonds that require execution by the Bond Trustee, including but limited to a Pledge and Security Agreement, dated on or after May 1, 2008, among the Obligated Group, the Bond Trustee, and the Letter of Credit Bank related to the Series 2007A Bonds and a Pledge and Security Agreement, dated on or after May 1, 2008, among the Obligated Group, the Bond Trustee, and the Letter of Credit Bank related to the Series 2007B Bonds. 5. That the City has not participated in the preparation of the Official Statement Supplement, dated on or after May 1, 2008 (the “Official Statement Supplement”), which supplements the Official Statement, dated as of October 18, 2007, relating to the offer and sale of the Series 2007A Bonds and the Series 2007B Bonds (collectively, the “Official Statement”), and has made no independent investigation with respect to the information contained therein, including the appendices thereto, and the City assumes no responsibility for the sufficiency, accuracy, or completeness of such information. Subject to the foregoing, the City hereby consents to the distribution and the use of the Official Statement, as supplemented, by Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, as remarketing agent for the Series 2007B-1 Bonds and Wells Fargo Brokerage Services, LLC, as remarketing agent for the Series 2007A Bonds and the Series 2007B-2 Bonds in connection with the remarketing of the Bonds. The Official Statement is the sole material consented to by the City for use in connection with the offer and sale of the Bonds. 6. That the Mayor and the City Manager are hereby further authorized to execute and deliver, on behalf of the City, such other documents and certificates as are required by Kennedy & Graven, Chartered, as bond counsel, or as are necessary or appropriate in connection with the execution and delivery of the documents described herein. Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council April 28, 2008. City Manager Mayor Attest: City Clerk Meeting Date: April 28, 2008 Agenda Item #: 4j Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance Presentation Other: EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other: Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other: TITLE: Appointment to I-394 Travel Demand Management Task Force. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to appoint C. Paul Carver to the I-394 Travel Demand Management Task Force. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Council Members with wards adjacent to I-394 have served on the Task Force in the past. BACKGROUND: Both St. Louis Park and Golden Valley have an I-394 Travel Demand Management (TDM) zoning overlay ordinance and Joint Powers Agreement that requires development within the I-394 corridor to “prepare and effectuate traffic management plans which will serve to reduce the traffic congestion.” The ordinances require that developers prepare a traffic management plan. This plan is reviewed and approved by a Joint Task Force made up of two Council members from each city, each city manager and one staff member from each city. Currently Council Member Sanger is appointed to the Task Force; a vacancy exists since previously appointed Council Member Velick is no longer on the Council. Council members with wards adjacent to I-394 have served on the Task Force in the past, and therefore it is proposed Council Member Carver be appointed. Two projects, one from Golden Valley and one from St. Louis Park, will be before the Task Force in the coming weeks. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not Applicable. VISION CONSIDERATION: This Task Force works on transportation issues related to addressing the Strategic Vision of - “St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged community.” Prepared by: Meg McMonigal, Planning & Zoning Supervisor Reviewed by: Kevin Locke, Community Development Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Meeting Date: April 28, 2008 Agenda Item #: 4k Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance Presentation Other: EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other: Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other: TITLE: Approve Encroachment Agreement at 7525 Wayzata Boulevard. RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: Motion to Approve Encroachment Agreement with BFW and Associates, LLC, for use of easement for a retaining wall at 7525 Wayzata Boulevard. POLICY CONSIDERATION: The City has a policy regarding the private use of public land. The proposal complies with the this policy. BACKGROUND: BFW and Associates, LLC, owns the site at 7525 Wayzata Boulevard. This site used to house an Embers Restaurant, and has been redeveloped into an office building. The applicant is requesting permission to place a small retaining wall in the drainage and utility easement on the west side of the property. There is a significant grade change in that area and the retaining wall is necessary in order to meet the dimensional requirements for the parking lot. The City’s Land Use Policy allows this type of private use of public land with an encroachment agreement. This encroachment agreement, drafted by the City Attorney, releases the City from any liability and allows the City to terminate the agreement at any time with 30 days notice. Staff has reviewed the application and site plan and finds that there is no conflicting use of this easement. The distance between the proposed retaining wall and the property line of 7525 Wayzata Boulevard is approximately 6 feet, and there is still another 15 feet to the curb line of Pennsylvania Avenue. VISION CONSIDERATION: None. Attachments: Map Prepared by: Laura Adler, Engineering Program Coordinator Reviewed by: Scott A. Brink, City Engineer Michael P. Rardin, Director of Public Works Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4k) Page 2 Subject: Encroachment Agreement at 7525 Wayzata Boulevard WAYZATA BLVD PENNSYLVANIA AVE S13TH LN W Text Proposed Encroachment Agreement at 7525 Wayzata Boulevard Proposed retaining wall Meeting Date: April 28, 2008 Agenda Item #: 4l MINUTES Housing Authority St. Louis Park City Hall, Westwood Room Wednesday, January 9, 2008 5:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioners Catherine Courtney, Steve Fillbrandt, Renee Fitzgerald, Trinicia Hill, Judith Moore STAFF PRESENT: Jane Klesk, Kathy Larsen, Kevin Locke, Michele Schnitker Miss Schnitker introduced Renee Fitzgerald, who was appointed Commissioner to the Housing Authority Board on January 7, 2008. 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 5:04 p.m. 2. Approval of Minutes for December, 2007 The Board minutes of December 10, 2007 were unanimously approved. 3. Hearings a. Housing Authority Annual Agency Plan 2008 Ms. Schnitker reviewed revisions made to the Plan since the 2007 submission, and stated that the draft Plan was on display for viewing at Hamilton House and City Hall and was presented at a Hamilton House Resident Council Meeting. The Plan was also reviewed by thirteen program participants who were generally supportive of the Plan and the revisions. Commissioner Courtney opened the Public Hearing at 5:18 p.m. Since no one was present other than staff and Commissioners, Commissioner Courtney closed the Public Hearing at 5:18 p.m. 4. Reports and Committees – None 5. Unfinished Business – None 6. New Business a. Housing Authority Certification with Housing Authority Plans and Related Regulations, Resolution No. 566 Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4l) Page 2 Subject: Housing Authority Minutes January 9, 2008 Ms. Schnitker explained the procedure for submitting the Agency Plan to HUD and reviewed the required certifications. Commissioner Fillbrandt moved to approve Resolution No. 566, PHA Certifications of Compliance with the PHA Plans and Related Regulations: Board Resolution to Accompany the Streamlined Annual PHA Plan. Commissioner Moore seconded the motion, and the motion passed 5-0. b. Contract Extension with Center for Energy and Environment – Discount Loan Ms. Larsen explained the Discount Loan Program background, the contract background and provided Discount Loan Program history. Commissioner Moore moved to approve the execution of the Contract for the Discount Loan Program with the Center for Energy and Environment (CEE) for professional services to provide loan administration services through December 31, 2008, for a fee of $125 per loan. Commissioner Hill seconded the motion, and the motion passed 5-0. c. 2008 Community Development Block Grant Proposal Ms. Larsen provided an update to the Board regarding the proposed allocation of approximately $200,000 in 2008 CDBG funds. The allocation will be distributed between single-family housing rehab, multi-family housing rehab and public service. Should the actual CDBG award received be less than anticipated, the proposed allocation to Perspectives, Inc. would be decreased. d. Election of Housing Authority Board Secretary After discussion, Commissioner Moore moved to appoint Commissioner Fitzgerald as Secretary of the Board, and Commissioner Fillbrandt seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0. 7. Communications from Executive Director a. Claims Lists – December, 2007 and January, 2008 b. Communications Ms. Schnitker stated that a new Public Housing Manager had been hired. Teresa Schlegel will start on January 23, 2008. 1. Monthly Report for January, 2008 2. Development Report 3. Action Plan 4. Scattered-Site Houses and Hamilton House (verbal report) 5. Draft Financial Statements – Report Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4l) Page 3 Subject: Housing Authority Minutes January 9, 2008 8. Other 9. Adjournment Commissioner Fillbrandt moved to adjourn the meeting, and Commissioner Moore seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0. The meeting was adjourned at 6:07 p.m. Respectfully submitted, __________________________ Renee Fitzgerald, Secretary Meeting Date: April 28, 2008 Agenda Item #: 4m MINUTES Housing Authority St. Louis Park City Hall, Westwood Room Wednesday, March 12, 2008 5:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioners Catherine Courtney, Steve Fillbrandt, Renee Fitzgerald, Trinicia Hill, Judith Moore STAFF PRESENT: Jane Klesk, Kevin Locke, Michele Schnitker, Teresa Schlegel 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 5:09 p.m. 2. Approval of Minutes for January, 2008 The Board minutes of January 9, 2008 were unanimously approved with the following addition to the end of paragraph 6.c.: Should the actual CDBG award received be less than anticipated, the proposed allocation to Perspectives, Inc. would be decreased. 3. Hearings – None 4. Reports and Committees – None 5. Unfinished Business – None 6. New Business a. Public Housing Utility Allowances, Resolution No. 567 Ms. Schnitker explained that utility allowance schedules are updated annually in accordance with HUD regulations, and are based on actual consumption averaged over a three-year period and projected rates for the upcoming fiscal year. Commissioner Moore moved to approve Resolution No. 567, Amendment of the 2008 Public Housing Utility Allowances for Scattered Site Housing, and Commissioner Fillbrandt seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0. b. Approval of Wayside Project Based Section 8 Rental Assistance Contract Renewal Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4l) Page 2 Subject: Housing Authority Minutes March 12, 2008 Ms. Schnitker provided the Board with background on Wayside House, Inc., and their current contract with the Housing Authority. Commissioner Fillbrandt moved to authorize the execution of an amendment to the contract with Wayside House, Inc. to administer 20 units of project based Section 8 Housing Choice rental assistance (PBA) at properties owned by Wayside House, Inc., at 1341 and 1349 Jersey Avenue South, for an additional two years, April 1, 2008 through March 31, 2010. Commissioner Fitzgerald seconded the motion, and the motion passed 5-0. c. Approval of Public housing Operating Budget for FYE 2009, Resolution No. 568 Ms. Schnitker explained that the HA is required to annually develop and adopt an Operating Budget to support the operation of its Public Housing Program. After discussion, Commissioner Moore moved to approve Resolution No. 568, Resolution of the Housing Authority of St. Louis Park Approving the Public Housing Operating Budget for the Fiscal Year Ending March 31, 2009. Commissioner Fitzgerald seconded the motion, and the motion passed 5-0. d. Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program Utility Allowances, Resolution No. 569 Ms. Schnitker explained that in accordance with HUD regulations, Section 8 utility allowances must be analyzed on an annual basis, and were last revised May 1, 2007. Allowances are based on actual consumption of the HA’s Section 8 participants. Commissioner Fillbrandt moved to approve Resolution No. 569, Resolution of the St. Louis Park Housing Authority Amending the Section 8 Utility Allowance Schedule, effective May 1, 2008, and Commissioner Fitzgerald seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0. e. Approval of Hamilton House Caretaker Contract Ms. Schnitker stated that the caretaker contracts for Hamilton House will expire on March 31, 2008. Samir and Azemka Music have expressed interest in continuing their caretaking duties, and their service has been excellent. Commissioner Moore moved to approve the Caretaker Contract with Samir and Azemka Music, in the amount of $450 per month in addition to free rent for a two bedroom unit, in exchange for caretaking duties at Hamilton House April 1, 2008 through March 31, 2009. Commissioner Hill seconded the motion, and the motion passed 5-0. f. Housing Activity Report Ms. Schnitker briefly reviewed the 2007 Housing Activity Report and the New 2008 Housing Programs report. Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4l) Page 3 Subject: Housing Authority Minutes March 12, 2008 7. Communications from Executive Director a. Claims List for February & March – 2008 b. Communications 1. Monthly Report for February & March – 2008 2. Scattered-Site Houses and Hamilton House (verbal report) 3. Draft Financial Statements – Report 8. Other 9. Adjournment Commissioner Moore moved to adjourn the meeting, and Commissioner Fillbrandt seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0. The meeting was adjourned at 6:18 p.m. Respectfully submitted, __________________________ Renee Fitzgerald, Secretary Meeting Date: April 28, 2008 Agenda Item #: 4n OFFICIAL MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA MARCH 19, 2008 – 6:00 p.m. COUNCIL CHAMBERS MEMBERS PRESENT: Lynne Carper, Claudia Johnston-Madison, Robert Kramer, Richard Person, Carl Robertson, Larry Shapiro, Michael Silver MEMBERS ABSENT: Dennis Morris STAFF PRESENT: Greg Hunt, Meg McMonigal 1. Call to Order 2. Approval of Minutes: None 3. Hearings: None 4. Other Business A. Proposed Modification to the Victoria Ponds TIF District Plan Resolution No. 79 Greg Hunt, Economic Development Coordinator, presented the staff report. Commissioner Carper asked if it was unusual that the redevelopment area is so distant from the Victoria Ponds TIF District. Mr. Hunt replied that state statutes allow tax increment from Redevelopment TIF Districts to be spent on qualified redevelopment activities outside the district as long as the increment is spent within the same Redevelopment Project Area, which it is in this case. Commissioner Carper asked how the Redevelopment Area was determined by the City. Mr. Hunt indicated that the Redevelopment Project Area encompasses approximately 75% of the city and was determined when the city’s first TIF Districts were created in the 1970s. Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4n) Page 2 Subject: Planning Commission Minutes March 19, 2008 Commissioner Carper asked about the expected market value of the former Erv’s Garage site upon redevelopment. Mr. Hunt indicated that the proposed project would have a value of under $1 million upon completion. Commissioner Kramer asked how the value is garnered. Mr. Hunt responded that the increased value derives from removing the substandard and nonconforming uses, cleaning up the site, and constructing a higher value commercial building. The proposed value was also determined reasonable by the city’s assessor. Commissioner Person asked if the Victoria Ponds project was completed. Mr. Hunt replied that it was completed. Commissioner Carper made a motion to adopt Resolution No. 79 finding that a modification to the redevelopment plan for Redevelopment Project No. 1 and a modification to the tax increment finance plan for the Victoria Ponds Tax Increment Financing District conform to the general plans for the development and redevelopment of the city. Commissioner Person seconded the motion. The motion passed on a vote of 6-0. 5. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 6:25 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Nancy Sells Administrative Secretary Meeting Date: April 28, 2008 Agenda Item #: 4o OFFICIAL MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA April 2, 2008--6:00 p.m. COUNCIL CHAMBERS MEMBERS PRESENT: Lynne Carper, Claudia Johnston-Madison, Robert Kramer, Dennis Morris, Richard Person, Carl Robertson, Larry Shapiro MEMBERS ABSENT: Michael Silver STAFF PRESENT: Meg McMonigal, Adam Fulton, Sean Walther, Nancy Sells 1. Call to Order – Roll Call Commissioner Person arrived at 6:10 p.m. 2. Minutes: March 5, 2008 Commissioner Morris made a motion to recommend approval of the March 5, 2008 minutes. Commissioner Johnston-Madison seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 5-0-1 (Carper abstained). 3. Hearings A. Conditional Use Permit with Setback Variances – Kamberg Condominium Project Location: 4101 31st Street West Applicant: Merlin Brown, Emery Art Development Case No.: 08-05-CUP and 08-06-VAR Adam Fulton, Planner, presented the staff report. Merlin Brown, Emery Art Development, applicant, spoke about projects his company had done. He described the Kamberg project. Commissioner Carper asked about the garage exit and if there would be adequate screening of headlights. Mr. Fulton responded staff looked at that closely and there was adequate screening with the brick wall. Staff also looked at the slope to make sure it would be appropriate for winter conditions. It was a 7% slope. The landscaping combined with the brick wall would accommodate the screening. Commissioner Carper asked the height of the wall. Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4o) Page 2 Subject: Planning Commission Minutes April 2, 2008 Mr. Brown replied it will be five or six feet. Commissioner Person asked if the building would have City recycling services or if the owner would provide it. Mr. Fulton replied condominium buildings are responsible for contracting that, which is typically handled through the homeowners association. Chair Robertson asked about the underground parking level. Mr. Fulton indicated there were 19 stalls in the underground parking and an additional level of sub-basement used for storage. Chair Robertson stated in the underground parking layout the turning radius appeared unworkable. Mr. Fulton showed a slide and explained the underground parking. He said underground parking is generally tighter than surface parking. The drive aisles were adequate. They had seen similar tight situations on other small condo developments. Chair Robertson opened the public hearing. As no one was present wishing to speak, the Chair closed the public hearing. Commissioner Morris asked about the condominium project abutting this site with a similar parking situation. He asked if that project had been constructed. Mr. Fulton replied it was nearly complete, but was not occupied. Commissioner Morris believed the parking code dictated the drive aisle width and it was his understanding if they had 20-22 feet it was considered sufficient to make a turn into and out of a parking stall. It was a difficult turning stance and undesirable, but within code it was acceptable. Mr. Fulton commented it was a “double-edged” sword. It was a tight situation and underground parking almost always is tight. If more obstructions were created it would add to cost and they would see less underground parking. Commissioner Morris asked about the DORA and asked if ponding areas were excluded in the calculations. Mr. Fulton replied that ponding areas are not included in DORA. Chair Robertson asked what determined the six feet from the drive aisle to the property line regarding the variance. He asked if that was based on width needed for planting. Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4o) Page 3 Subject: Planning Commission Minutes April 2, 2008 Mr. Fulton stated it wouldn’t be appropriate to plant anything there if it was less than six-feet. Less than six feet wasn’t ideal. Six feet was adequate to provide sufficient growth medium for trees and shrubs. Chair Robertson noted with creative landscaping, if that area was narrowed, they would not need the variance. Mr. Fulton replied that was correct. Chair Robertson stated that as the parking was private, not public, people would get accustomed to the constraints. Mr. Fulton noted there were 19 spaces in the underground parking garage. Under the previous parking code, only a total of 18 spaces would have been required for the whole project and two of those could be on the street resulting in only 16 spaces underground. The regulations were redone and the applicant was meeting those regulations, but it did constrain the underground parking. Ms. McMonigal stated the corner spaces were slightly wider than the interior spaces, which would help turning movements. Chair Robertson asked if there is a problem issuing a variance when the building could be shifted and have a narrower planting strip. Mr. Fulton indicated this was the most appropriate design because of the buffer to the neighbors. The buffer was included because of a staff recommendation to the applicant. Commissioner Johnston-Madison said she liked the project and felt it would fit into the neighborhood. She said she wouldn’t like to see the building moved over because it was better to have the extra green space on that edge. Commissioner Johnston-Madison made a motion to recommend approval of a Conditional Use Permit allowing a multi-family dwelling in the R-4 Zoning District with variances, subject to conditions recommended by staff. Commissioner Morris seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 7-0. 4. Other Business A. Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development Duke Realty’s “The Shops at West End” Location: Southwest quadrant of I-394 and Highway 100 Applicant: Duke Realty, L.P. Case Nos.: 07-60-S and 07-61-PUD Ms. McMonigal introduced the applications and provided background information including site amenities. Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4o) Page 4 Subject: Planning Commission Minutes April 2, 2008 Mr. Walther presented the staff report and recommendations. He stated that the sign plan would come before the Commission at a later date with the hotel project. David Bade, Duke Realty and J. R. Anderson, partner, gave a presentation showing the project image, buildings and landscaping. Commissioner Morris asked about the location of drinking fountains. Mr. Anderson replied he was unsure of the locations at this time. Commissioner Morris asked about the location of public restrooms. Mr. Anderson replied they would be in the atrium area next to the mall office. Commissioner Morris asked if there would be public telephones. Mr. Anderson said he was unsure, and they hadn’t thought about it. Commissioner Morris stated an issue raised early in the process that he didn’t see addressed was bike racks. Mr. Anderson replied they did have a number of bike racks (Nero design) dispersed throughout near the streets, in the arcade area, and in the garage. Mr. Walther added racks were also incorporated in the streetscape plan. Commissioner Johnston-Madison suggested the applicant work with staff incorporating Lilac Way and its history. She commented that there is a lot of old stone that will be removed in the area. She asked if the applicant would talk to staff about incorporating the old stone as a remembrance or tribute to Lilac Way in the fountains or public art. Mr. Anderson indicated they were working with staff on creating public art. Commissioner Kramer noted the graphics in the presentation were very helpful. He asked about people getting dropped off and blocking traffic on West End Blvd. He asked if there will be a drop off area. Mr. Anderson stated there would be “teaser” parking in that area. They were also proposing cars being able to park there, and one or two spaces could be reserved for drop off only. Commissioner Kramer noted at the Mall of America there are people getting dropped off and causing lines of cars behind them, slowing up the traffic. He said he sees the same thing happening at the West End. He said he was having a hard time seeing West End Blvd. as a quiet pedestrian mall as the applicant was proposing. How do they propose to slow the traffic and get people to cross? Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4o) Page 5 Subject: Planning Commission Minutes April 2, 2008 Mr. Anderson replied when people come in at 16th, there is a four-way stop, which would slow traffic. People are allowed to drive through that area. The teaser parking will help slow people down. Changing the pavement surface helps slow people down and then there is another four-way stop. When they have used the paver patterns and different materials to break it up, the theory was that cars slow down. They hope there is enough pull off area by the arcade. Commissioner Kramer stated at four-way stops people hop out of cars. He encouraged the developer to design around that somehow. Mr. Anderson indicated there will be a valet area that could also be utilized. Commissioner Kramer asked which commercial environment in the area they would compare this project to. Mr. Anderson replied perhaps it could be compared to Arbor Lakes or 50th and France. Because of the theater and the height of the structure this project varied. It would be the feel of Arbor Lakes with the pavers, plants and tree grates. It would be the feel of 50th and France with the type of retailers, a more urban environment, the type of street and sidewalks, and different architectural feel. Commissioner Carper asked if they proposed heated sidewalks. Mr. Anderson replied heated sidewalks are a massive expense and because of the parking structure below, it wasn’t feasible. They have an on-site mall management office and there would be an abundance of people to remove snow from sidewalks. With the history of Duke and how they operate their centers, snow removal will be done as soon as possible. Concrete pavers will be used, which are not as slippery as granite. Commissioner Person asked about signage indicating availability of stalls in the parking ramps. Mr. Walther responded that signage related to the service dock areas that access off of Park Place Blvd. and are limited to truck court areas. They will restrict access during peak hours with electronic pop-ups that prevent people from going in when it is full or during the daytime hours when they didn’t allow delivery to those areas. When it was open, there would be directory signage available for truck drivers to know if it was full and to bring them to a staging area in the alley. Commissioner Person asked if it was possible during peak periods that a vehicle could enter the underground ramp and find that there were no spaces available. Mr. Walther stated the worst case scenario would be someone entering the below ground ramp, not finding a stall and crossing to the five-level ramp to find a place. In the peak of the season and peak hours, it may be necessary to go to the office ramps where there is shared parking and overflow parking. There are Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4o) Page 6 Subject: Planning Commission Minutes April 2, 2008 pedestrian connections to the atrium area. Mr. Anderson added there is a pedestrian connection at the third level from the existing parking ramps, across the alley and into the third level of the deck. There will also be a vehicular connection across the alley. Commissioner Johnston-Madison commented that she really likes the project and it looks better each time they see it. Chair Robertson asked about the future of the outlot area. Mr. Walther responded it was an outlot now for a couple of reasons. The City has been working with Golden Valley on the opportunity to do a Joint Powers Agreement so the developer could develop this as one site and the City of St. Louis Park would be able to do approvals for the whole area. A portion of the project remains in Golden Valley and there would be a split in the tax base that came from that. They were also exploring options of bringing more of the development into the St. Louis Park portion of the property. There was a lot of flex in the planning for that area so the options are open as plans develop to determine what was the right amount of right-of-way and the right configuration for buildings, etc. With an outlot, they will have to come back for a preliminary and final plat approval of that parcel and it may or may not include portions of Golden Valley. Commissioner Person asked about the project summary and the last page about the LEED certification. The development team mentioned at various meetings seeking LEED certification at the core and shell level, was that still the plan? Mr. Bade replied this plan was for the retail portion and what they envisioned was the LEED core and shell certification for the office project. For the retail project they would be using the LEED program as a baseline, but because it was more challenging, they probably would not be going after core and shell certification, but would be using those checklists and trying to get as many of those points as they could. Additionally they were working with the Watershed District on 1ow impact design and that was a storm water management that brought in the LEED concepts. Commissioner Person noticed under the energy and atmosphere category it was listed as being “none”. It was hard to believe they wouldn’t build in energy conservation or energy heating systems when they had the opportunity to do that. Mr. Bade stated it was a retail project and some of those concepts and systems would be implemented, but perhaps not up to the level to get the LEED points. Chair Robertson followed up that a lot of the points are for on-site generation, such as solar panels or wind, which would not happen in this project. He explained that it is hard to control lighting levels that retailers use because they need to highlight their product to sell. Even though they could use efficient lighting, as a big project it was very tough to get those points. Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4o) Page 7 Subject: Planning Commission Minutes April 2, 2008 Commissioner Person asked if the heating systems would be natural gas. Mr. Bade replied yes, most of the tenants would use natural gas for their HVAC units. Mr. Anderson added each tenant would have their own rooftop units that would condition just their space. Chair Robertson asked if there was any accommodation coming for solar panels for heating. Mr. Anderson replied not at this point. Commissioner Person asked if a green roof was being looked at for any of the buildings. Mr. Anderson replied yes, they were contemplating it for the grocery building. In the office building, they were looking at two spots. They were working with the Watershed District on their grant program and incorporating a number of concepts into the retail project and also opportunities on the office. Commissioner Morris spoke about the condition regarding sidewalk display. He said considering the extent of the architectural design, streetscape design and other amenities it seemed outdoor display contradicted this nice, clean look. He spoke about places like Home Depot with a lot of items outside. He said he knew it was allowed in the PUD ordinance, but he was against the concept of allowing businesses to clutter the areas with merchandise. Commissioner Kramer agreed with the comments about Home Depot, but disagreed for this project. He said generally anything set outside temporarily added to the vibrancy and drew people there. Ms. McMonigal compared this feature to Excelsior and Grand. The retailers asked for a little bit of room to do a little bit of display. It was only slightly used in that area. Commissioner Morris recommended that on individual cases the Fire Department should have some say. In Minneapolis, prior to a change in the ordinance within the last few years allowing sidewalk cafes to leave tables and chairs out every night, they had to bring them back in. The Fire Marshall discovered they were packing them in the aisles, which was a hazard. Ms. McMonigal stated staff would check with the Fire Marshall. Commissioner Person made a motion to recommend approval of the Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development, subject to conditions recommended by staff. Commissioner Kramer seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 7-0. Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4o) Page 8 Subject: Planning Commission Minutes April 2, 2008 5. Communications 6. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned 7:40 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Amy Stegora-Peterson Recording Secretary Meeting Date: April 28, 2008 Agenda Item #: 4p Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance Presentation Other: EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other: Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other: TITLE: Vendor Claims. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to accept for filing Vendor Claims for the period March 31, 2008 through April 25, 2008. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. BACKGROUND: The Finance Department prepares this report on a monthly basis for Council’s review. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: None. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. Attachments: Vendor Claims Prepared by: Connie Neubeck, Account Clerk 04/23/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:59:28R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 1Page -Council Check Summary 04/25/2008 -04/01/2008 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 1,541.59FABRICATIONOTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES3M 1,541.59 100.00SPECIAL EVENTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES3RD LAIR SKATEPARK 600.00SKATEBOARD/INLINE PROGRAMS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 700.00 3,000.00POLICE G & A TRAININGA&S TRAINING LLC 3,000.00 179.95TREE MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESA-1 OUTDOOR POWER INC 179.95 603.12SWEEPINGGENERAL SUPPLIESABLE HOSE & RUBBER INC 603.12 7,854.38EQUIPMENT REPLACE G&A OTHERACTIVE NETWORK LTD 7,854.38 1,598.80HUMAN RESOURCES RECRUITMENTAD STRATEGIES 1,598.80 510.90EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESADMINISTRATION RESOURCES CORP 510.90 197.66POLICE G & A OTHER RECOVERIESALL HOURS TOWING 197.66 128.00H.V.A.C. EQUIP. MTCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICEALLIANCE MECH SRVCS INC 128.00 500.00ADULT SOFTBALL PROGRAM REVENUEALM, ALLEN 500.00 8.68SPRINGGENERAL SUPPLIESALMSTEAD'S SUPERVALU 35.11SPECIAL INTEREST GENERAL SUPPLIES 43.79 277.84GENERAL REPAIR TIRESAMERICAN TIRE DISTRIBUTORS 277.84 Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4p) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 2 04/23/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:59:28R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 2Page -Council Check Summary 04/25/2008 -04/01/2008 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 135.50WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIESAMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOC 135.50 125.86GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE OPERATIONAL SUPPLIESAMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SER 291.99PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 35.60PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 282.76PARK MAINTENANCE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 190.60ENTERPRISE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 188.74VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 180.98WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 179.97SEWER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 1,476.50 997.40PRINTING/REPRO SERVICES OFFICE SUPPLIESANCHOR PAPER CO 997.40 3,021.77FABRICATIONOTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESANDERSEN INC, EARL 3,021.77 245.00COMM DEV PLANNING G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSAPA 245.00 788.10HUMAN RESOURCES TRAININGAPI FUND FOR PAYROLL EDUCATION 788.10 413.08GENERAL CUSTODIAL DUTIES CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SUPPLYARAMARK UNIFORM CORP ACCTS 457.74ENTERPRISE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 870.82 40.30WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERSASKANASS, PHILLIP 40.30 369.42WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESAUTOMATIC SYSTEMS INC 731.83WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 1,101.25 131.58GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEAUTOMOBILE SERVICE 131.58 16.67HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESBARNA, GUZY & STEFFEN LTD 16.67 Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4p) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 3 04/23/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:59:28R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 3Page -Council Check Summary 04/25/2008 -04/01/2008 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 2,907.46PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESBARTLEY SALES CO 2,907.46 2,596.25OPERATIONSTRAININGBASIC ANIMAL RESCUE TRAINING 2,596.25 75.66SEWER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIESBATTERIES PLUS 75.66 261.95PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESBEACON ATHLETICS 1,891.00PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,152.95 438.66HOUSING REHAB BALANCE SHEET CONTRACTS PAYABLEBIRCHWOOD NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOC 438.66 220.18ORGANIZED REC G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CARBIRNO, RICK 220.18 472.81HOUSING REHAB BALANCE SHEET CONTRACTS PAYABLEBLACKSTONE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN 472.81 920.00PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESBLAYLOCK PLUMBING CO 920.00 522.00EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A HEALTH INSURANCEBLUE PRINT FOR HEALTH 522.00 2,201.25ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL SERVICESBORG, JOHN 2,201.25 1,144.38GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT PARTSBOYER TRUCK PARTS 1,144.38 1,409.85GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEBOYER TRUCKS LAUDERDALE 1,409.85 8,465.00GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET CLEARING ACCOUNTBRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 8,465.00 854.34ORGANIZED REC G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESBRENTS SIGNS AND DISPLAYS 854.34 Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4p) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 4 04/23/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:59:28R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 4Page -Council Check Summary 04/25/2008 -04/01/2008 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 310.76HOUSING REHAB BALANCE SHEET CONTRACTS PAYABLEBROOKSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN 310.76 297.60SAFETY SERVICES SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSBUSINESS & LEGAL REPTS 297.60 1,410.00POLICE G & A RENTAL OTHERCALHOUN TOWERS APTS 1,410.00 5,987.27ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL SERVICESCAMPBELL KNUTSON PROF ASSOC 2,726.00WIRELESS G & A LEGAL SERVICES 8,713.27 438.34PRINTING/REPRO SERVICES RENTAL EQUIPMENTCANON FINANCIAL SERVICES 438.34 1,976.67DESKTOP SUPPORT/SERVICES EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICECARTRIDGE CARE 1,976.67 348.04GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT PARTSCATCO PARTS SERVICE 348.04 120.00PUBLIC WORKS G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTATCEAM 120.00 4,904.74DISCOUNT LOAN PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESCENTER ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT 1,300.00MOVE-UP PROGRAM SERVICES/MRKTG OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,027.00CITYWIDE SF INSPECT REHAB PRGM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 9,231.74 6,106.24FACILITY OPERATIONS HEATING GASCENTERPOINT ENERGY 3,528.54PARK MAINTENANCE G & A HEATING GAS 329.52WESTWOOD G & A HEATING GAS 439.18NATURALIST PROGRAMMER HEATING GAS 402.00WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 11,224.23WATER UTILITY G&A HEATING GAS 582.33REILLY G & A HEATING GAS 1,251.85SEWER UTILITY G&A HEATING GAS 23,863.89 Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4p) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 5 04/23/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:59:28R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 5Page -Council Check Summary 04/25/2008 -04/01/2008 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 15,714.01FACILITY OPERATIONS HEATING GASCENTERPOINT ENERGY SERVICES IN 13,418.51ENTERPRISE G & A HEATING GAS 29,132.52 1,446.50PRINTING/REPRO SERVICES OFFICE SUPPLIESCENTRAL ENVELOPE CORPORATION 1,446.50 6,299.99EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S OTHER RETIREMENTCENTRAL PENSION FUND 6,299.99 1,840.00BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICECERTIFIED PLUMBING INC 1,840.00 117.57FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESCINTAS FIRST AID & SAFETY 147.97WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 265.54 355.00HUMAN RESOURCES SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSCITIZENS INDEPENDENT BANK 72.11HUMAN RESOURCES MEETING EXPENSE 1.02COMM & MARKETING G & A TELEPHONE 28.80TECH & SUPPORT SERVICES BUDGET GENERAL SUPPLIES 39.82FINANCE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 21.04FINANCE G & A MEETING EXPENSE 35.00COMM DEV PLANNING G & A TRAINING 395.00SUPERVISORYSEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 234.00SUPERVISORYTRAVEL/MEETINGS 329.90RANGEOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 14.82OPERATIONSOFFICE SUPPLIES 258.28OPERATIONSGENERAL SUPPLIES 289.98OPERATIONSOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 255.00OPERATIONSSUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 68.74OPERATIONSTRAINING 663.00INSPECTIONS G & A TRAINING 280.00ENGINEERING G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 235.64VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 300.00VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A TRAINING 21.53VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A INTEREST/FINANCE CHARGES 15.99GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT PARTS 42.56CABLE TV G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,630.25CABLE TV G & A OFFICE EQUIPMENT 9.54TV PRODUCTION GENERAL SUPPLIES 5,597.02 Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4p) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 6 04/23/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:59:28R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 6Page -Council Check Summary 04/25/2008 -04/01/2008 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 1,500.00COMM & MARKETING G & A PRINTING & PUBLISHINGCITY IMAGE COMMUNICATIONS 1,500.00 321.40ORGANIZED REC G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESCLEARR CORP 321.40 16,054.62ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL SERVICESCOLICH & ASSOCIATES 16,054.62 6,500.00GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET CLEARING ACCOUNTCOLLIERS TURLEY MARTIN TUCKER 6,500.00 920.00WIRELESS G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESCOLUMBIA TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO 920.00 369.85NETWORK SUPPORT SERVICES DATACOMMUNICATIONSCOMCAST 369.85 1,109.00WIRING REPAIR OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESCOMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION 1,109.00 567.66BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESCONTINENTAL RESEARCH CORP 567.66 823.93GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT PARTSCRYSTEEL TRUCK EQUIP INC 823.93 92.20POLICE G & A SUBSISTENCE SUPPLIESCUB FOODS 92.20 185.19WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICECUMMINS NPOWER LLC 185.19 4,627.32WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESDAKOTA SUPPLY GROUP 4,627.32 521.12BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESDALCO ENTERPRISES INC 521.12 40.76PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESDEKO FACTORY SERVICE INC 40.76 Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4p) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 7 04/23/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:59:28R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 7Page -Council Check Summary 04/25/2008 -04/01/2008 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 762.55POLICE G & A RENTAL EQUIPMENTDELAGE LANDEN FINANCIAL SERVIC 762.55 2,613.29INSPECTIONS G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTSDEPT LABOR & INDUSTRY 2,613.29 510.00COMMUNICATIONS/GV REIMBURSEABL TELEPHONEDEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 510.00 990.00BLDG/GROUNDS OPS & MAINT BUILDING MTCE SERVICEDETERMAN BROWN INC 990.00 5.86WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERSDETLOFF MANAGEMENT 5.86 207.50ENTERPRISE G & A ADVERTISINGDEX MEDIA EAST LLC 207.50 818.90COMM & MARKETING G & A PRINTING & PUBLISHINGDO-GOOD.BIZ INC 404.29PRINTING/REPRO SERVICES PRINTING & PUBLISHING 2,257.91POSTAL SERVICES POSTAGE 227.37HOUSING REHAB BALANCE SHEET CONTRACTS PAYABLE 435.90HOUSING REHAB BUDGET POSTAGE 4,144.37 55.77GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIESDRYWALL SUPPLY INC 55.77 67.57INSPECTIONS G & A BUILDINGELDER-JONES BUILDING PERMIT SE 67.57 807.50SEWER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEELECTRIC PUMP INC 807.50 13,149.77GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEEMERGENCY APPARATUS MTNCE 13,149.77 203.82OPERATIONSOPERATIONAL SUPPLIESEMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS 203.82 Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4p) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 8 04/23/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:59:28R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 8Page -Council Check Summary 04/25/2008 -04/01/2008 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 2,556.00TREE DISEASE PUBLIC CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICEEMERY'S TREE SERVICE INC 2,556.00 930.00HUMAN RESOURCES SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSEMPLOYERS ASSOCIATION INC 315.00SUPPORT SERVICES TRAINING 1,245.00 217.75ESCROWSBass Lake/EDI/UPENSR CORPORATION 14,479.28REILLY G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5,546.50SAMPLINGGENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6,446.50STUDIESGENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 26,690.03 77.27ORGANIZED REC G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESEPA AUDIO VISUAL INC 77.27 52.42GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT PARTSFACTORY MOTOR PARTS CO 52.42 1,512.07EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A TUITIONFARROW, NIKKI 1,512.07 32.48REILLY BUDGET OPERATIONAL SUPPLIESFEDEX 32.48 648.82ICE RESURFACER MOTOR FUELSFERRELLGAS 648.82 6,362.74COMM & MARKETING G & A PRINTING & PUBLISHINGFIRST IMPRESSION GROUP 6,362.74 23.00POLICE G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESFLORIDA DEPT OF LAW ENFORCEMEN 23.00 95.00COP SHOP REPAIRSFLOYD TOTAL SECURITY 95.00 217.06SANDING/SALTING OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESFORCE AMERICA INC 570.03GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT PARTS 787.09 Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4p) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 9 04/23/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:59:28R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 9Page -Council Check Summary 04/25/2008 -04/01/2008 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 3,333.33ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL SERVICESFRANZEN & ASSOCIATES LLC 3,333.33 1,500.00COMM & MARKETING G & A PRINTING & PUBLISHINGFRIENDS OF THE ARTS 1,500.00 230.04GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT PARTSGARELICK STEEL CO 334.31BLDG/GROUNDS OPS & MAINT BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 564.35 284.78GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT PARTSGLASS DOCTOR 284.78 157.02VOLLEYBALLGENERAL SUPPLIESGLS SPORTS EQUIPMENT EXPERTS 90.39ADULT FITNESS PROGRAMS GENERAL SUPPLIES 247.41 4,394.39INSTALLATIONOTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESGOPHER SIGN 4,394.39 362.30WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICEGOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 362.30 49.95PUBLIC WORKS G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSGOVERNING 49.95 94.29FACILITIES MCTE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIESGRAINGER INC, WW 111.22GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 775.32PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 34.99GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT PARTS 49.13WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 1,064.95 89.27VOICE SYSTEM MTCE EQUIPMENT PARTSGRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO 89.27 450.00MOVE-UP PROGRAM SERVICES/MRKTG OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESGUNSTAD, MARK 450.00 720.21WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIESHACH CO 720.21 Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4p) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 10 04/23/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:59:28R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 10Page -Council Check Summary 04/25/2008 -04/01/2008 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 13,311.95WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIESHAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP 13,311.95 38.22WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESHD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD 38.22 68.70STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICEHEDBERG AGGREGATES 68.70 100.00OPERATIONSSUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSHENNEPIN COUNTY FIRE CHIEFS AS 100.00 8,000.00PARK MAINTENANCE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESHENNEPIN COUNTY SENTENCING TO 8,000.00 600.00POLICE G & A SUBSISTENCE SERVICEHENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFFS ACCTG 600.00 52.50GENERAL FUND G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESHENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 1,304.00POLICE G & A SUBSISTENCE SERVICE 49.50PARK AND REC G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 28.50SSD 1 G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 42.00SSD 2 G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 31.50SSD 3 G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 64.50SSD #4 G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 369.80PERMANENT IMPR REVOLVING G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 931.27WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 15.23SEWER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,888.80 1,250.00OPERATIONSGENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESHENNEPIN FACULTY ASSOCIATES 1,250.00 1,500.00APPLICATION SUPPORT/SERVICE GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESHEYER SOLUTIONS 1,500.00 573.50HARD SURFACE FLOOR MTCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIESHIRSHFIELDS 573.50 4,500.00ESCROWSPMC ESCROWHOBBS, RANDY 4,500.00 Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4p) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 11 04/23/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:59:28R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 11Page -Council Check Summary 04/25/2008 -04/01/2008 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 1,579.50PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESHOFFER'S COATINGS INC 1,579.50 336.02GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESHOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 9.50SWEEPINGGENERAL SUPPLIES 11.94GRAFFITI CONTROL OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 18.05DAMAGE REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES 127.44DAMAGE REPAIR OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 233.24INSTALLATIONSMALL TOOLS 565.85PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 119.56PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 72.61TREE MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 56.99BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 179.69PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 16.46WATER UTILITY G&A BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 1,747.35 79.94GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESHOME HARDWARE 9.35POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 11.27GRAFFITI CONTROL OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 212.38PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 36.30BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 4.57VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 22.01WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 17.10WATER UTILITY G&A SMALL TOOLS 82.43WATER UTILITY G&A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 19.66SEWER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 22.00SEWER UTILITY G&A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 517.01 600.00APPLICATION SUPPORT/SERVICE COMPUTER SERVICESHRG TECHNOLOGY GROUP 600.00 40.75HUMAN RESOURCES MEETING EXPENSEHSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 11.72CLERICALSUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 51.36WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 23.44WESTWOOD G & A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 127.27 223.21GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT PARTSI-STATE TRUCK CENTER 223.21 Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4p) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 12 04/23/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:59:28R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 12Page -Council Check Summary 04/25/2008 -04/01/2008 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 120.00SUPERVISORYSUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSIACP 120.00 30.00VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSIATN 30.00 138.08DESKTOP SUPPORT/SERVICES OFFICE EQUIPMENTIBM 138.08 193.33INSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESICC 193.33 394.32INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS GENERAL SUPPLIESICE SKATING INST AMERICA 394.32 15.99ORGANIZED REC G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESIKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS 164.25WESTWOOD G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 180.24 933.73ENGINEERING G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESIMAGETECH SERVICES 933.73 500.00ESCROWSBROOKSIDE TRAFFIC STUDYIMPERIAL BUILDERS 500.00 1,154.95CABLE TV G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESIMPLEX.NET INC 1,154.95 202.78BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIESINDELCO 76.15WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT PARTS 7.60WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 286.53 109.06PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESINDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO INC 109.06 2,962.50SEWER UTILITY G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDIINFRASTRUCTURE TECH INC 2,962.50 110.28GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT PARTSINTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEM OF M 110.28 Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4p) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 13 04/23/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:59:28R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 13Page -Council Check Summary 04/25/2008 -04/01/2008 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 69.43GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT PARTSINVER GROVE FORD 69.43 67.90ADMINISTRATION G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESIRON MOUNTAIN 67.00POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 134.90 25.25PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESJERRY'S MIRACLE MILE 23.81GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES 49.06 25.97WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERSJI, YICHAO 25.97 3,112.00PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESJT MURAL PAINTING & THEME ARTS 3,112.00 134.00PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE LUBRICANTS/ADDITIVESKATH FUEL OIL SERVICE 134.00 3,339.61ESCROWSBass Lake/EDI/UPKENNEDY & GRAVEN 3,339.61 49.05HOUSING REHAB BALANCE SHEET CONTRACTS PAYABLEKILMER NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOC 49.05 2,900.00PE SURVEYS ENGINEERING SERVICESKLM ENGINEERING INC. 1,000.00PE PLANS/SPECS ENGINEERING SERVICES 3,900.00 71.76BLDG/GROUNDS OPS & MAINT BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIESKRUGE-AIR INC 71.76 16.84ENVIRONMENTAL G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESKRZESOWIAK, SARAH 16.84 310.07WIRELESS G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CARLANDIS, FRANK 310.07 75.81PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT PARTSLANO EQUIPMENT INC 19,525.71EQUIPMENT REPLACE G&A MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENT 19,601.52 Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4p) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 14 04/23/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:59:28R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 14Page -Council Check Summary 04/25/2008 -04/01/2008 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 78.56HOUSING REHAB G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CARLARSEN, KATHY 78.56 254.65ELECTRICAL SYSTEM MTCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIESLARSON, JH CO 254.65 306.21GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIESLAWSON PRODUCTS INC 306.21 20.90GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT PARTSLDV INC 20.90 1,150.00HUMAN RESOURCES ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENTLEADERSHIP SOLUTIONS 1,150.00 10,690.40EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A League of MN Cities dept'l expLEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 10,690.40 125.00ADMINISTRATION G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTATLEAGUE OF MN CITIES 20.00SAFETY SERVICES SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 145.00 519.37UNINSURED LOSS G&A UNINSURED LOSSLEAGUE OF MN CITIES INSURANCE 519.37 58.80POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESLEXISNEXIS 58.80 3,258.00AQUATIC PARK G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIESLIFEGUARD STORE, THE 3,258.00 140.00OPERATIONSTRAININGLISTIAK, MIKE 140.00 619.24GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT PARTSLITTLE FALLS MACHINE INC 619.24 1,061.17TECHNOLOGY REPLACE G&A OFFICE EQUIPMENTLOFFLER COMPANIES 1,061.17 Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4p) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 15 04/23/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:59:28R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 15Page -Council Check Summary 04/25/2008 -04/01/2008 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 83,382.08APPLICATION SUPPORT/SERVICE COMPUTER SERVICESLOGIS 1,287.00NETWORK SUPPORT SERVICES COMPUTER SERVICES 41.54APPLICATION SUPPORT/SERVICES OFFICE EQUIPMENT 84,710.62 35.29WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERSLUCOFF, PHIL 35.29 160.00INSPECTIONS G & A TRAININGM A H C O 160.00 160.82TREE MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESM&I SUPPLY CO 160.82 150.00GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEMAACO AUTO PAINTING 150.00 1,048.50ADMINISTRATION G & A MEETING EXPENSEMACKENZIE & FRIENDS, INC 1,223.25HUMAN RESOURCES ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT 2,271.75 28.49GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT PARTSMAGNETO POWER LLC 28.49 656.59WATER UTILITY G&A BUILDING MTCE SERVICEMANAGED SERVICES INC 656.59 448.22PATCHING-PERMANENT OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESMCCOY, WILLIAM PETROLEUM FUELS 60.71VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A MOTOR FUELS 508.93 120.00INSPECTIONS G & A TRAININGMEHA 120.00 75.00OPERATIONSSUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSMEMA 75.00 54.70INSTALLATIONOTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESMENARDS 58.70FABRICATIONOTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 106.92ORGANIZED REC G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 3.67PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4p) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 16 04/23/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:59:28R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 16Page -Council Check Summary 04/25/2008 -04/01/2008 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 24.69PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 9.49WW RENTAL HOUSE (1322)GENERAL SUPPLIES 331.24WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 83.62-BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 505.79 28.76PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESMETRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY 28.76 304.88OPERATIONSEQUIPMENT PARTSMETRO FIRE INC 304.88 1,541.40WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICEMETRO LEAK DETECTION INC 1,541.40 810.00POLICE G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEMETRO SALES INC 810.00 306.00VOLLEYBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESMETRO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS 306.00 294,271.77OPERATIONSCLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICEMETROPOLITAN COUNCIL 294,271.77 138.62POLICE G & A POLICE EQUIPMENTMICRO CENTER 54.37WATER UTILITY G&A OFFICE SUPPLIES 192.99 281.66REILLY BUDGET EQUIPMENT PARTSMID AMERICA METER INC 281.66 408.10OPERATIONSOPERATIONAL SUPPLIESMIDWEST BADGE & NOVELTY CO 191.70SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS PRINTING & PUBLISHING 599.80 25,470.18VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A MOTOR FUELSMIDWEST FUELS INVER GROVE HEIG 25,470.18 1,701.85BLDG/GROUNDS OPS & MAINT BUILDING MTCE SERVICEMIDWEST OVERHEAD CRANE CORP 1,701.85 Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4p) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 17 04/23/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:59:28R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 17Page -Council Check Summary 04/25/2008 -04/01/2008 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 364.48HOUSING REHAB BALANCE SHEET CONTRACTS PAYABLEMINIKAHDA OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD AS 364.48 88.50ASSESSING G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSMINNEAPOLIS AREA ASSOC REALTOR 88.50 708.00PAWN FEES OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESMINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPT 708.00 500.41EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S ACCRUED OTHER BENEFITSMINNESOTA BENEFIT ASSOC 500.41 987.52EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S WAGE GARNISHMENTSMINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PYT CT 987.52 21,552.00WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESMINNESOTA DEPT HEALTH 21,552.00 27.56EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S WAGE GARNISHMENTSMINNESOTA DEPT REVENUE 27.56 344.00SUPPORT SERVICES TRAININGMINNESOTA HIGHWAY SAFETY & RES 2,064.00SUPERVISORYTRAINING 1,376.00PATROLTRAINING 344.00SCHOOL LIASON TRAINING 4,128.00 250.00HOUSING REHAB G & A TRAININGMINNESOTA NAHRO 250.00 16.00EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S ACCRUED OTHER BENEFITSMINNESOTA NCPERS LIFE INS 16.00 25.00ELECTRICAL SYSTEM MTCE LICENSESMINNESOTA REVENUE 25.00 40.00PARK MAINTENANCE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSMINNESOTA SOCIETY OF ARBORICUL 40.00 432.00OPERATIONSSUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSMINNESOTA STATE FIRE DEPT ASSO 432.00 Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4p) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 18 04/23/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:59:28R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 18Page -Council Check Summary 04/25/2008 -04/01/2008 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 179.89PRINTING/REPRO SERVICES OFFICE SUPPLIESMINUTEMAN PRESS 179.89 211.94WATER UTILITY G&A BUILDING MTCE SERVICEMINVALCO INC 26.35WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 12.35SEWER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 250.64 200.00VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A BUILDING MTCE SERVICEMN WEIGHTS AND MEASURES 200.00 25,589.93SANDING/SALTING OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESMORTON SALT 25,589.93 300.00FRANCHISE ADMINISTRATION OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESMOSS & BARNETT 300.00 50.00INSPECTIONS G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSMPHA 50.00 45.00PARK MAINTENANCE G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTATMSTMA 45.00 33.55VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIESMTI DISTRIBUTING CO 715.83GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT PARTS 749.38 431.00WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESMVTL LABORATORIES 1,215.00REILLY BUDGET OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,646.00 168.69INSTALLATIONOTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESNAPA (GENUINE PARTS CO) 43.52PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 80.90PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 142.68VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 29.33PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 28.26PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE LUBRICANTS/ADDITIVES 292.61PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT PARTS 89.73GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES 477.57GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT PARTS 1,353.29 Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4p) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 19 04/23/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:59:28R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 19Page -Council Check Summary 04/25/2008 -04/01/2008 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 75.75ASSESSING G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CARNATHANSON, BRIDGET 75.75 150.00SUPERVISORYSUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSNATOA 150.00 25.00WESTWOOD G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSNATURAL HISTORY 25.00 106.50DAMAGE REPAIR OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESNEENAH FOUNDREY 106.50 91.60BLDG/GROUNDS OPS & MAINT BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIESNEW PIG CORPORATION 91.60 225.00MOVE-UP PROGRAM SERVICES/MRKTG OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESNICOLELLI, GENE 225.00 330.00VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSNIGP 330.00 418.55AQUATIC PARK MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIESNORTHERN AIRE SWIMMING POOLS 418.55 6,167.52WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESNORTHERN WATER WORKS SUPPLY 6,167.52 12,144.83BROCHUREPRINTING & PUBLISHINGNYSTROM PUBLISHING 12,144.83 1,500.00ANIMAL CONTROL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESOAK KNOLL ANIMAL HOSPITAL 1,500.00 1,412.30ENGINEERING G & A OFFICE SUPPLIESOCCUPATIONAL DEVELOPMENT CENTE 1,412.30 137.36WESTWOOD G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAROESTREICH, MARK 137.36 53.76HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICE SUPPLIESOFFICE DEPOT 36.99TECH & SUPPORT SERVICES G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4p) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 20 04/23/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:59:28R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 20Page -Council Check Summary 04/25/2008 -04/01/2008 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 226.94DESKTOP SUPPORT/SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES 8.42ASSESSING G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 218.46FINANCE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 19.77GENERAL INFORMATION OFFICE SUPPLIES 251.67POLICE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 149.40POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 284.08OPERATIONSOFFICE SUPPLIES 378.09INSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 398.75PUBLIC WORKS G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 81.08ORGANIZED REC G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 67.08NATURE CENTER CARETAKER GENERAL SUPPLIES 5.00HOUSING REHAB G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 469.62WATER UTILITY G&A OFFICE SUPPLIES 322.05WATER UTILITY G&A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 73.89SEWER UTILITY G&A OFFICE SUPPLIES 3,045.05 131.86NETWORK SUPPORT SERVICES DATACOMMUNICATIONSOFFICE OF ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOG 62.86VOICE SYSTEM MTCE TELEPHONE 4,159.96FACILITY OPERATIONS TELEPHONE 100.24NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH TELEPHONE 751.80COMMUNICATIONS/GV REIMBURSEABL TELEPHONE 5,206.72 1,897.50INSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESOFFICE TEAM 1,897.50 7.67GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT PARTSOLSEN CHAIN & CABLE CO INC 161.34SEWER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 169.01 120.00COMM DEV PLANNING G & A MEETING EXPENSEOLSON, MARY CLAIRE 120.00 149.98PORTABLE TOILETS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESON SITE SANITATION 149.98 5,175.72TREE MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESOSTVIG TREE INC 430.32TREE MAINTENANCE CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 5,606.04 Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4p) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 21 04/23/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:59:28R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 21Page -Council Check Summary 04/25/2008 -04/01/2008 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 156.70SUPERVISORYTRAININGPARKER, JON 156.70 35.00INSPECTIONS G & A MEETING EXPENSEPARKTACULAR 35.00 92.76GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT PARTSPARTS PLUS 92.76 84.00PICNIC SHELTERS RENT REVENUEPAUTZ, CHERYL 84.00 241.70COMM & MARKETING G & A PRINTING & PUBLISHINGPERNSTEINER CREATIVE GROUP INC 241.70 47.87WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERSPETERSON, LYNN 47.87 14.98COMMUNITY OUTREACH G & A MEETING EXPENSEPETTY CASH 33.98POLICE G & A TRAINING 12.00PROSECUTIONMEETING EXPENSE 26.00SUPERVISORYMEETING EXPENSE 11.67INSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 40.12INSPECTIONS G & A TRAINING 22.67INSPECTIONS G & A MEETING EXPENSE 66.00SEWER UTILITY G&A LICENSES 227.42 214.99GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT PARTSPIONEER RIM & WHEEL CO 214.99 60.00OPERATIONSTRAININGPLYMOUTH, CITY OF 60.00 44.44WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERSPOAGUE, CHRISTINE 44.44 471.80PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE TIRESPOMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC 30.00-GENERAL REPAIR TIRES 273.80GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 715.60 Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4p) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 22 04/23/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:59:28R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 22Page -Council Check Summary 04/25/2008 -04/01/2008 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 359.10PARK MAINTENANCE G & A TELEPHONEPOPP TELECOM 359.10 180.00SUPPORT SERVICES LICENSESPOST BOARD 540.00SUPERVISORYLICENSES 990.00PATROLLICENSES 1,710.00 3,900.00COMM & MARKETING G & A POSTAGEPOSTMASTER - PERMIT #603 594.98BROCHUREPOSTAGE 492.45WATER UTILITY G&A POSTAGE 492.45SEWER UTILITY G&A POSTAGE 492.43SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS POSTAGE 492.43STORM WATER UTILITY G&A POSTAGE 6,464.74 4,288.98ACCIDENT REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEPRESTIGE COLLISION & GLASS 4,288.98 1,250.43PRINTING/REPRO SERVICES PRINTING & PUBLISHINGPRINT SHOP 1,250.43 144.00ICE RESURFACER EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEPRINTERS SERVICE INC 144.00 90.00PE INVEST/REVIEW/PER IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDIPROGRESSIVE CONSULTING ENGINEE 90.00 250.00HOUSING REHAB BALANCE SHEET CONTRACTS PAYABLEPROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING 250.00 143.71BLDG/GROUNDS OPS & MAINT BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIESPUMP & METER SERVICE 143.71 310.55WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICEQUALITY RESTORATION SERVICES I 310.55 59.94SEWER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT PARTSQUEST ENGINEERING INC 59.94 44.69HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL SUPPLIESQUICKSILVER EXPRESS COURIER 44.69 Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4p) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 23 04/23/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:59:28R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 23Page -Council Check Summary 04/25/2008 -04/01/2008 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 644.95FACILITY OPERATIONS TELEPHONEQWEST 55.21NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH TELEPHONE 110.42COP SHOP TELEPHONE 2,022.37COMMUNICATIONS/GV REIMBURSEABL TELEPHONE 18.10E-911 PROGRAM TELEPHONE 22.45REC CENTER BUILDING TELEPHONE 2,873.50 1,743.28FACILITY OPERATIONS GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICERANDY'S SANITATION INC 840.41REC CENTER BUILDING GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE 74.64WATER UTILITY G&A GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE 576.08SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE 3,234.41 149.63WATER UTILITY G&A POSTAGERAPID GRAPHICS & MAILING 149.63SEWER UTILITY G&A POSTAGE 149.63SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS POSTAGE 149.64STORM WATER UTILITY G&A POSTAGE 598.53 315.90PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDIREED BUSINESS INFORMATION 315.90 7,348.50SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS OTHERREHRIG PACIFIC CO 7,348.50 141.74TECH & SUPPORT SERVICES G & A OFFICE SUPPLIESRELIABLE OFFICE SUPPLIES 141.74 381.25ADULT FITNESS PROGRAMS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESRICHARDSON, TERESA 381.25 181.49PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESRICMAR INDUSTRIES 181.49 987.29PRINTING/REPRO SERVICES RENTAL EQUIPMENTRICOH CUSTOMER FINANCE CORP 987.29 22.27GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT PARTSRIGID HITCH INC 22.27 Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4p) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 24 04/23/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:59:28R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 24Page -Council Check Summary 04/25/2008 -04/01/2008 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 1,269.21WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESRMR SERVICES 1,269.21 150.60CLEANING/DEBRIS REMOVAL CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICERRT PROCESSING SOLUTIONS LLC 150.60 212.23GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICESAFELITE FULFILLMENT INC 212.23 225.00MOVE-UP PROGRAM SERVICES/MRKTG OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESSALA ARCHITECTS INC 225.00 402.02BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIESSAVITT BROS INC 402.02 138.00ADMINISTRATION G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESSCHAAKE COMPANY, AJ 138.00 96.13PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIESSCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 222.23SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 318.36 478.92GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE SMALL TOOLSSEARS COMMERCIAL ONE 478.92 42,335.29PE INVEST/REVIEW/PER IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDISEH 308.00STORM WATER UTILITY BUDGET OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 42,643.29 350.39PARK MAINTENANCE G & A SMALL TOOLSSEVEN CORNERS ACE HDWE 350.39 31.39WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERSSHAPIRO, SOL 31.39 460.25ADULT FITNESS PROGRAMS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESSHEEHAN, ALEEAH 460.25 1.60-GRAFFITI CONTROL OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESSHERWIN WILLIAMS 275.94PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 274.34 Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4p) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 25 04/23/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:59:28R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 25Page -Council Check Summary 04/25/2008 -04/01/2008 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 28.17GRAFFITI CONTROL OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESSHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO 28.17 768.85GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICESIMPLEXGRINNELL LP 156.38BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 925.23 1,000.00ESCROWSPMC ESCROWSLAVENKOV, JOAN 1,000.00 132.48ADMINISTRATION G & A TELEPHONESPRINT 50.61COMM & MARKETING G & A TELEPHONE 256.10RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT TELEPHONE 84.82FINANCE G & A TELEPHONE 204.78POLICE G & A TELEPHONE 42.41INSPECTIONS G & A TELEPHONE 771.20 299.55PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIESSPS COMPANIES INC 113.84PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 157.50WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 38.80WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 609.69 2,595.15ESCROWSDuke Construction-Mps West TSSRF CONSULTING GROUP INC 1,892.55PE DESIGN IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 54,100.61CE DESIGN IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 58,588.31 1,859.63PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT MAINTENAN OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESST CROIX REC CO 1,859.63 35.00ADMINISTRATION G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTATST LOUIS PARK PUBLIC SCHOOLS F 35.00 206.00COMM DEV PLANNING G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSST LOUIS PARK SUNRISE ROTARY 206.00 1,924.88PATCHING-PERMANENT OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESST PAUL, CITY OF 1,924.88 Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4p) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 26 04/23/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:59:28R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 26Page -Council Check Summary 04/25/2008 -04/01/2008 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 50.00INSPECTIONS G & A MECHANICALSTAFFORD ELECTRIC, PAUL 50.00 62.92ADMINISTRATION G & A LONG TERM DISABILITYSTANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY, TH 55.19HUMAN RESOURCES LONG TERM DISABILITY 15.76COMM & MARKETING G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY 43.35TECH & SUPPORT SERVICES G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY 19.89ASSESSING G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY 73.25FINANCE G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY 114.67COMM DEV G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY 18.17FACILITIES MCTE G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY 125.47POLICE G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY 79.69OPERATIONSLONG TERM DISABILITY 77.18INSPECTIONS G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY 45.37PUBLIC WORKS G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY 58.05ENGINEERING G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY 21.18PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY 85.00ORGANIZED REC G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY 21.18PARK MAINTENANCE G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY 17.66ENVIRONMENTAL G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY 17.66WESTWOOD G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY 18.67REC CENTER/AQUATIC PARK SAL LONG TERM DISABILITY 18.17VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A LONG TERM DISABILITY 17.16HOUSING REHAB G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY 21.18WATER UTILITY G&A LONG TERM DISABILITY 2,217.72EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A LONG TERM DISABILITY 3,244.54 172.00BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICESTANLEY ACCESS TECH LLC 172.00 117.78POLICE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSSTAR TRIBUNE 117.78 91.98OPERATIONSGENERAL SUPPLIESSTEMMER, LUKE 91.98 375.36GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT PARTSSTONEBROOKE EQUIPMENT INC 375.36 923.36PARK MAINTENANCE G & A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESSTORAGE EQUIPMENT INC 923.36 Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4p) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 27 04/23/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:59:28R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 27Page -Council Check Summary 04/25/2008 -04/01/2008 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 220.77WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESSTRAND MFG CO 125.78SEWER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 346.55 7,787.71POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIESSTREICHER'S 39.39SUPERVISORYOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 74.54GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT PARTS 8,391.32EQUIPMENT REPLACE G&A MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENT 16,292.96 8.24GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT PARTSSUBURBAN CHEVROLET 1,123.12GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 1,131.36 102.35WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESSUBURBAN FEED & SUPPLY 102.35 387.00VOICE SYSTEM MTCE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICESUMMIT FINANCIAL RESOURCES LP 387.00 623.00PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT MAINTENAN GENERAL SUPPLIESSUMMIT SUPPLY CORP OF COLORADO 623.00 328.90ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL NOTICESSUN NEWSPAPERS 171.60PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 500.50 528.00BASKETBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESSWEELEY, DAVID 528.00 183.82GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESTARGET BANK 160.38POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 32.88POLICE G & A SUBSISTENCE SUPPLIES 14.25WINTERGENERAL SUPPLIES 391.33 529.44DARE PROGRAM OPERATIONAL SUPPLIESTEE'S PLUS 529.44 34.83ADMINISTRATION G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESTELELANGUAGE INC 34.83 Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4p) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 28 04/23/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:59:28R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 28Page -Council Check Summary 04/25/2008 -04/01/2008 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 94.00BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICETERMINIX INT 94.00 500.00ESCROWSPMC ESCROWTHOMSEN, WES & CONNIE 500.00 60.00HUMAN RESOURCES SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSTHOMSON WEST 60.00 662.50BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICETHYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR 662.50 143.91WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERSTILSETH, CHRISTINA 143.91 396.25ADMINISTRATION G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESTIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL 396.25 32.00PICNIC SHELTERS RENT REVENUETIMOTHY LUTHERAN CHURCH 32.00 90,947.13EQUIPMENT REPLACE G&A MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENTTRUCK BODIES & EQUIPMENT INTL 90,947.13 8.74PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT PARTSTURFWERKS LLC 8.74 712.00AQUATIC PARK BUDGET ADVERTISINGTWIN CITIES KIDS DIRECTORY 712.00 518.13BLDG/GROUNDS OPS & MAINT BUILDING MTCE SERVICETWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO 518.13 1,451.00SNOW PLOWING OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESTWIN CITY OUTDOOR SERVICES INC 9,920.00SSD 1 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,503.00SSD 3 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 14,874.00 7.60BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESTWIN CITY OXYGEN CO 7.59GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES 15.19 Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4p) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 29 04/23/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:59:28R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 29Page -Council Check Summary 04/25/2008 -04/01/2008 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 557.00ADMINISTRATION G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSTWIN WEST CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 45.00ADMINISTRATION G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 602.00 182.50COP SHOP REPAIRSUHL CO INC 182.50 345.14PATROLOPERATIONAL SUPPLIESUNIFORMS UNLIMITED 351.60RESERVESOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 65.87OPERATIONSOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 762.61 3,686.68UNINSURED LOSS BUDGET OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESUNITED STATES TREASURY 3,686.68 244.50EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S UNITED WAYUNITED WAY OF MINNEAPOLIS AREA 244.50 16,962.50WIRELESS G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESUNPLUGGED CITIES LLC 16,962.50 26.42VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A POSTAGEUPS STORE 26.42 57.59NETWORK SUPPORT SERVICES TELEPHONEUSA MOBILITY WIRELESS INC 74.64POLICE G & A TELEPHONE 576.32OPERATIONSTELEPHONE 18.90WATER UTILITY BUDGET TELEPHONE 727.45 220.20WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICEVALLEY-RICH CO INC 220.20 144.00BASKETBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESVANG, WILLIAM 144.00 143.93ENVIRONMENTAL G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CARVAUGHAN, JIM 143.93 30.38WATER UTILITY G&A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTATVERBAL JUDO INSTITUTE INC 30.38 Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4p) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 30 04/23/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:59:28R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 30Page -Council Check Summary 04/25/2008 -04/01/2008 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 1,352.81VOICE SYSTEM MTCE TELEPHONEVERIZON WIRELESS 220.36COMMUNICATIONS/GV REIMBURSEABL TELEPHONE 1,573.17 19.84WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERSVISION WORLDWIDE INC 19.84 100.08WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERSWAGNER, JON 100.08 67,298.24SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICEWASTE MANAGEMENT 32,075.60SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS RECYCLING SERVICE 14,766.88SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS YARD WASTE SERVICE 22,177.08SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE 136,317.80 5.33GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT PARTSWAYTEK 5.33 4,975.42SEWER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEWEBER ELECTRIC 4,975.42 3,298.77ADULT SOFTBALL GENERAL SUPPLIESWESTWOOD SPORTS 3,298.77 426.00DAMAGE REPAIR EQUIPMENT PARTSWHEELER LUMBER OPERATIONS 426.00 160.25GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT PARTSWHEELER'S AUTOBODY SUPPLY 160.25 6.00SPRINGGENERAL SUPPLIESWIELOCK, JOAN 6.00 25.47OPERATIONSGENERAL SUPPLIESWINDSCHITL, MARK 25.47 581.09EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S STATE WITHHOLDINGWISCONSIN DEPT OF REVENUE 581.09 Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4p) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 31 04/23/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:59:28R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 31Page -Council Check Summary 04/25/2008 -04/01/2008 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 93,808.00WOLFE LAKE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESWOLFE LAKE ASSOCIATION 93,808.00 345.00AQUATIC PARK G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSWORLD WATERPARK ASSOC 345.00 9,435.66FACILITY OPERATIONS ELECTRIC SERVICEXCEL ENERGY 20.22OPERATIONSELECTRIC SERVICE 24,891.09PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE 2,975.94PARK MAINTENANCE G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE 187.93PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE ELECTRIC SERVICE 24.29BRICK HOUSE (1324)ELECTRIC SERVICE 51.95WW RENTAL HOUSE (1322)ELECTRIC SERVICE 326.12WESTWOOD G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE 12,340.07ENTERPRISE G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE 846.43WATER UTILITY G&A ELECTRIC SERVICE 23,268.30OPERATIONSELECTRIC SERVICE 1,870.09OPERATIONSELECTRIC SERVICE 3,484.51OPERATIONSELECTRIC SERVICE 1,842.81OPERATIONSELECTRIC SERVICE 28.61WIRELESS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 351.17WIRELESS G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 81,945.19 168.65NETWORK SUPPORT/SERVICES OFFICE EQUIPMENTXIOTECH CORP 168.65 20.00POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESYAHOO .41POLICE G & A POSTAGE 20.41 100.13PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESZACKS INC 100.13 479.08GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT PARTSZIEGLER INC 479.08 106.01PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A OFFICE SUPPLIESZIP PRINTING 143.63ORGANIZED REC G & A PRINTING & PUBLISHING 106.01PARK MAINTENANCE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 1,031.06AQUATIC PARK BUDGET PRINTING & PUBLISHING Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4p) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 32 04/23/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:59:28R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 32Page -Council Check Summary 04/25/2008 -04/01/2008 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 106.01VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A OFFICE SUPPLIES 1,492.72 Report Totals 1,489,548.79 Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 4p) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 33 Meeting Date: April 28, 2008 Agenda Item #: 6a Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance Presentation Other: EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other: Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other: TITLE: Public Hearing - Off-Sale Liquor License - The Four Firkins RECOMMENDED ACTION: Mayor to close public hearing. Motion to approve off-sale intoxicating liquor license to The Four Firkins – Lagers, Ales and Wines, LLC, located at 8009 Minnetonka Boulevard for the license term of May 1, 2008 through March 1, 2009. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the Council wish to approve the off-sale intoxicating liquor license to The Four Firkins? BACKGROUND: The City received an application from The Four Firkins – Lagers, Ales and Wines, LLC for an off- sale intoxicating liquor license operation at 8009 Minnetonka Boulevard. The premises to be licensed consists of a small storefront approximately 900 square feet (part of the Texa-Tonka annex). Jason Alvey is the sole officer and plans to begin operation in mid-May 2008. The Four Firkins is proposed to be the first specialty beer store in Minnesota selling only high end craft beers, microbrew beers, imported beers and wine; along with brewing accessories. The establishment does not intend to sell any mass produced beer or any type of hard liquor. The business name, “The Four Firkins”, refers to a traditional unit of liquid measure (four firkins comprise one barrel). The Police Department has run a full background investigation and has found no reason to deny the new ownership based on the investigation. The application and Police report are on file in the Office of the City Clerk should Council members wish to review the information prior to the public hearing. The required notice of the public hearing was published April 17, 2008. The city currently has 11 intoxicating off-sale licensees. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The fees for new liquor licenses are found in Appendix A - Fee Schedule of the City Code. Fees for this applicant include $1,000 for a new license investigation fee and a $200 off-sale license fee (pro- rated). VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable Attachments: None Prepared by: Nancy Stroth, City Clerk Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Meeting Date: April 28, 2008 Agenda Item #: 6b Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance Presentation Other: EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other: Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other: TITLE: Public Hearing and First Reading of Ordinance - West End Sewer Easement Vacation. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Mayor to close public hearing. Motion to approve the first reading of an Ordinance approving the vacation of a portion of a Sewer Easement on Lot 4, Block 1, WEST END, and set the second reading of the proposed ordinance for May 5, 2008. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Is there a need for the drainage and utility easement proposed to be vacated? This easement is within the West End redevelopment project. The West End development provides for relocation of the sewer line and the subdivision plat provides drainage and utility easements needed for this area. BACKGROUND: The existing sewer line and easement lie beneath a proposed building for the West End Redevelopment project (the proposed grocery store). The developer proposes to relocate the sewer line, and the WEST END final plat provides for the long-term drainage and utility needs of this area. The proposed ordinance would not be effective until the sewer line is relocated and the WEST END subdivision is recorded with Hennepin County. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: None. VISION CONSIDERATION: None. Attachments: Draft Ordinance Survey and Legal Description of the Sewer Easement to be Vacated Prepared by: Sean Walther, Senior Planner Reviewed by: Meg McMonigal, Planning & Zoning Supervisor Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 6b) Page 2 Subject: Public Hearing and First Reading Ordinance West End Sewer Easement Vacation ORDINANCE NO. _____-08 AN ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF A SEWER EASEMENT LOT 4, BLOCK 1, WEST END THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK DOES ORDAIN: Section 1. A petition in writing signed by a majority of all of the owners of all property abutting the utility easement proposed to be vacated has been duly filed. The notice of said petition has been published in the St. Louis Park Sailor on April 17, 2008, and the City Council conducted a public hearing upon said petition and determined that the utility easement is not needed for public purposes, and that it is for the best interest of the public that said utility easement be vacated. Section 2. The sewer easement as now dedicated and laid out within the corporate limits of the City of St. Louis Park shown on Exhibit A and described below, is vacated: That portion of the sewer easement recorded in Document No. 618344, Hennepin County Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota lying south of the north line of Lot 4, Block 1, WEST END, Hennepin County, Minnesota Section 3. The City Clerk is instructed to record certified copies of this ordinance in the Office of the Hennepin County Register of Deeds or Registrar of Titles as the case may be. Sec.4. This Ordinance shall take effect upon relocation of the sewer line and recording of the WEST END final plat with Hennepin County, but not less than fifteen days after its publication. First Reading Second Reading Date of Publication Date Ordinance takes effect Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council ________, 2008 City Manager Mayor Attest: Approved as to Form and Execution: City Clerk City Attorney Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 6b) Page 3 Subject: Public Hearing and First Reading Ordinance West End Sewer Easement Vacation EXHIBIT A Meeting Date: April 28, 2008 Agenda Item #: 8a Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance Presentation Other: EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other: Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other: TITLE: Project Report - Park Place Boulevard Improvements - Project No. 2007-1101. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution accepting this report, establishing and ordering Improvement Project No. 2007-1101, approving plans and specifications, and authorizing advertisement for bids. POLICY CONSIDERATION: None. BACKGROUND: Over the past 1-2 years, plans have gradually developed for the West End (Duke) site improvements in the area west of Highway 100, east of Park Place Boulevard, and north of Gamble Drive. The development of these plans included many items, including a traffic study that recommended improvements to Park Place Boulevard. Improvements to Park Place Boulevard are necessary primarily to provide for the additional traffic generated by the Duke development. On November 5, 2007, the City Council authorized a contract with SRF Consulting Engineers to prepare plans and specifications for reconstructing and improving Park Place Boulevard. The improvements will essentially consist of the following: 1. Adding of turn lanes and improvements to the intersections of Park Place Boulevard with Wayzata Boulevard, W. 16th Street, and Gamble Drive. 2. Installation of new traffic signals at the above intersections. 3. Complete removal and replacement of the existing bituminous surface and concrete curb and gutter. 4. Revision of street grades and profiles as needed to match the proposed West End Development, as well as other existing properties bordering Park Place Boulevard. 5. Construction of a multi-use trail along the west side of Park Place Boulevard. 6. Incorporation of streetscape amenities that will not only compliment the West End Development, but also enhance the entire street corridor from Wayzata Boulevard to Gamble Drive. These amenities will include decorative street lighting, boulevard trees and plantings, and median plantings and streetscape enhancements. A Special Service District (similar to the current system in place on Excelsior Boulevard) is also being established to provide for long term maintenance for the corridor. Several permanent and temporary easements will be needed to facilitate the streetscape amenities and trail construction. 7. Extension of mill and overlay improvements on 16th Street from Park Place Boulevard to Zarthan Avenue South. Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8a) Page 2 Subject: Project Report – Park Place Boulevard Improvements - Project No. 2007-1101 At the February 11, 2008 Study Session, staff presented the City Council with an update on the progress of the Park Place Boulevard plans and streetscape improvements. The plans are now complete and ready to advertise for bids. Public Process The size, complexity, and schedule of the West End Development have largely influenced and driven the speed and shaping of the Park Place Boulevard reconstruction plans. However, a public process, very much consistent with that followed for similar projects has also been followed. In addition to the many public information meetings provided for the West End development itself, additional public information meetings and individual property contacts exclusive to Park Place Boulevard reconstruction have also taken place. An informational meeting was held for adjacent property owners on November 29, 2007, and additional open-house/informational meetings for businesses, residents, and property owners in the greater area were held on February 21, 2008. In addition to the open public meetings, many separate meetings with individual property owners have been held throughout development of the project. In addition, extensive contact and coordination with other agencies has been necessary. This has included the Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT), Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD), and Metro Transit. Project Timeline: Should the City Council approve the Project Report, it is anticipated that the following schedule can be met: • Approval of Plans/Authorization to Bid by City Council April 28, 2008 • Advertise for bids May 2008 • Bid Opening May 27, 2008 • Bid Tab Report to City Council; Award contract June 2, 2008 • Begin Construction June, 23, 2008 • Substantial Completion of Roadway November, 2008 • Final Completion, Including Streetscape Amenities August, 2009 FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Preliminary estimates for the roadway and streetscape portions of Park Place Boulevard are $5,000,000 and $1,500,000, respectfully. The fees for the streetscape improvements will be paid from Developer and TIF funds. Projected Costs Street Reconstruction $ 5,000,000 Streetscape Construction $ 1,500,000 Projected Funding Development Agreement (Duke) $ 250,000 Tax Increment Financing (TIF) $ 5,000,000 HRA Levy and/or TIF $ 1,250,000 Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8a) Page 3 Subject: Project Report – Park Place Boulevard Improvements - Project No. 2007-1101 VISION CONSIDERATION: Design of the Park Place Boulevard Roadway and Streetscape Improvements will consider and accomplish the following Vision related goals: Sidewalks and Trails and Transportation: 1. Will provide improved safety and facilities for pedestrians and bicycles. 2. Will provide stronger links to destinations, including gathering centers and transit facilities. Attachments: Resolution Map of Project Location Prepared by: Scott Brink, City Engineer Reviewed by: Mike Rardin, Director of Public Works Kevin Locke, Director of Community Development Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8a) Page 4 Subject: Project Report – Park Place Boulevard Improvements - Project No. 2007-1101 RESOLUTION NO. 08-_______ RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE PROJECT REPORT, ESTABLISHING IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 2007-1101 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS NO. 2007-1101 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park has received a report from the City Engineer related to the Park Place Boulevard Improvement Project, Project No. 2007-1101. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, that: 1. The Project Report regarding Project No. 2007-1101 is hereby accepted. 2. Such improvements as proposed are necessary, cost effective, and feasible as detailed in the Project Report. 3. The proposed project, designated as Project No. 2007-1101 is hereby established and ordered. 4. The plans and specifications for the making of these improvements, as prepared under the direction of the City Engineer, or designee, are approved. 5. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted at least two weeks in the official newspaper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids for the making of said improvements under said-approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall appear not less than ten (10) days prior to the date and time bids will be received by the City Clerk, and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the City Clerk and accompanied by a bid bond payable to the City for five (5) percent of the amount of the bid. 6. The City Engineer, or designee, shall report the receipt of bids to the City Council shortly after the letting date. The report shall include a tabulation of the bid results and a recommendation to the City Council. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council April 28, 2008 City Manager Mayor Attest: City Clerk Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8a) Subject: Project Report – Park Place Boulevard Improvements - Project No. 2007-1101 Page 5 Meeting Date: April 28, 2008 Agenda Item #: 8b Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance Presentation Other: EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other: Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other: TITLE: “West End” - Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to adopt a resolution approving a Final Plat for the WEST END addition with conditions as recommended by the Planning Commission and Staff. Motion to adopt a resolution approving a Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) for a portion of the West End redevelopment project with conditions as recommended by the Planning Commission and Staff. PREVIOUS APPROVALS: In August 2007, Duke Realty received Preliminary Plat approval and a Conditional Use Permit to conduct some of the site work including grading and utilities. A portion of that work is underway. In February and March 2008, the City Council approved a Rezoning from IP – Industrial Park to O – Office, a Preliminary Plat Amendment with Subdivision Variances, and a Preliminary Planned Unit Development for the redevelopment project. POLICY CONSIDERATION: This development addresses many adopted goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan including in the areas of land use, redevelopment, and livable communities by fostering redevelopment, community identity, compact development and improved community connections. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable for these approvals. VISION CONSIDERATION: This development addresses several of the City Council adopted Strategic Direction areas, including: Gathering Spaces, Community Events, Transportation, Sidewalk and Trails, and Environment. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLANS: Duke Realty Corporation owns approximately 49 acres at the southwest corner of I-394 and Highway 100. The Final Plat covers 42.67 acres that are within St. Louis Park. The Final PUD is for the portion of the project west of Utica Avenue. Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Page 2 Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development Proposed for redevelopment is a compact, urban “lifestyle” shopping center and hotel site on the west side of Duke’s property. The existing office towers and parking structures will remain, as will the Olive Garden and Chili’s restaurants. Duke plans to construct the retail/restaurant/ entertainment part of the overall plan in a single phase beginning in 2008, with completion expected in the fall of 2009. Lifestyle Shopping Center Duke Realty and joint venture partner Jeffrey R. Anderson Real Estate plan to redevelop the site as a “lifestyle” shopping center of approximately 410,567 gross square feet on approximately 18 acres. The development will feature: (a) Retail tenants consistent with an urban “lifestyle” center (b) Casual and sit-down restaurants (c) A 14-screen movie theater (d) A 130-150 room hotel (e) 34,678 gross square feet of second story office space (f) Gourmet grocery store To serve the development, 16th Street will be extended east from Park Place Boulevard to Utica Avenue. A new main street, “West End Boulevard” will run north and south parallel to Park Place Boulevard, and function as the focal point of the “lifestyle” center. It will have shops fronting on it and provide access to the underground and ramped parking. The shopping area opens up to Park Place Boulevard and a pedestrian arcade connects it to West End Boulevard. Shops will be located along the pedestrian-friendly environment of the arcade. Parking will be provided by a surface parking lot north of 16th Street, a single-level, underground parking garage beneath the largest retail block, and a five-level parking structure adjacent to the east side of the retail. A skyway will connect the existing parking structure for the existing office towers with the new five-level structure to facilitate shared parking within the redevelopment. Public Gathering Spaces Gathering spaces accessible to the public include West End Boulevard, the pedestrian arcade, the indoor Atrium at the entrance to the movie theater, and the large green space in the center of the new office buildings. West End Boulevard will be able to be partially closed for community events and gatherings. The indoor Atrium space will include a community meeting room, public restrooms and a police substation. The City and Duke will enter into a Planning Development Contract that addresses public use of the gathering spaces. Green Elements The developer will incorporate several LEED design elements in the shopping center project. The developer also worked with Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) to provide partial green roofs behind the second story offices, and to provide engineered soils under, and slot drains in, the sidewalks to improve tree health/growth and capture stormwater. Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Page 3 Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development The more impressive achievements of the developer’s stormwater management system result from directing roof water directly to pipes to avoid contamination on the ground, and using an underground, perforated pipe gallery system for storage and infiltration. This system is projected to remove 47 lbs/yr of phosphorus. To put that into perspective, the developer is required to remove 2 lbs/yr, and the MCWD’s 2020 phosphorus reduction goal for the entire Brownie Lake sub- watershed is 12 lbs/yr. Public Art Spaces for public art have been preliminarily identified include: (1) the terminus of 16th Street at Utica Avenue, and (2) the northern terminus of West End Boulevard at 16th Street. Staff and Duke will be working through a public art process to refine locations and selection of public art. The Developer will fund $285,000 for public art as a part of the PUD. Other locations around the site may have art as well (i.e. the two ends of the pedestrian arcade and the atrium). SITE LOCATION MAP: Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Page 4 Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development Park Place Boulevard A number of improvements along Park Place Boulevard were recommended with the proposed redevelopment to maintain acceptable intersection operations, including additional lanes and turn lanes. As a result, Park Place Boulevard will be reconstructed in 2008-09. The improvements include widening the road in certain places, and adding several left and right turn lanes at intersections between Gamble Drive and Wayzata Boulevard. Engineering and planning staff are meeting with property owners along the construction area to discuss the project; meetings will continue through the spring and through construction. The City anticipates creating a special service district with properties adjacent to the reconstructed Park Place Boulevard in order to ensure proper maintenance of new landscaping, lighting and other streetscape amenities. Transit Accommodation Metro Transit has reviewed the site plan and worked with city staff to plan for this redevelopment. Metro Transit will reroute the 604 and 649 through the development after enough office towers are built. A bus layover area has been designed in the public street at the eastern end of 16th Street, and a turnaround for buses will be needed in the future office portion of the project at the terminus of 16th Street. The Park and Ride and transit service at the corner of Park Place and the frontage road will remain; the bus shelter will likely be moved slightly. Additional bus stops will be needed on 16th Street and Park Place Boulevard; streetscape plans will reflect the need for handicap accessibility to the buses. Travel Demand Management The St. Louis Park and Golden Valley I-394 Joint Powers Agreement requires development within the I-394 corridor to “prepare and effectuate traffic management plans which will serve to reduce the traffic congestion.” The Travel Demand Management (TDM) Ordinance in St. Louis Park requires that “the owner shall submit the traffic management plan to the joint task force which shall review and approve all traffic management plans before they may be implemented.” The Developer has submitted a draft TDM plan for approval of the Task Force; approval is required prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) OBJECTIVES: The intent is that the entire site be an integrated, cohesive development as a PUD. The initial Final PUD request covers the existing office towers, existing restaurants, hotel pad site, and shopping center. The PUD may be amended in the future to expand and include planned office towers east of Utica Avenue. The West End development requires a PUD to allow the shopping center use and for certain modifications from the Zoning Code. The Zoning Code requires that applicants for a Planned Unit Development demonstrate how the proposal will “enhance, support, and further the following objectives”: Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Page 5 Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development 1. Provide for integrated pedestrian facilities to and within the project: The layout extended the existing street grid, incorporating the layout of 16th Street and Utica Avenue and augmenting the grid with additional private roads and pedestrian corridors. Sidewalks are provided along all streets. To improve pedestrian connections, the development includes skyways connecting to existing office towers and parking ramps, and indoor and outdoor gathering spaces. A preliminary design for a pedestrian-oriented streetscape is also provided for Park Place Boulevard, 16th Street, Gamble Drive, West End Boulevard and Utica Avenue. Enhanced streetscape design will improve the site for pedestrians accessing the retail component. 2. Enhance linkages to mass transit facilities: At the current time, the development site is served by three Metro Transit routes: the 9, 604 and 649. Route 9 is a “frequently operating transit line” under the existing Zoning Code and Metro Transit may increase the frequency and modify the routes following the construction of the office towers. The Developer is providing a bus layover and bus shelters on 16th Street near Utica Avenue. City staff, consistent with Metro Transit’s request, recommends providing a bus turnaround at the terminus of 16th Street at Utica Avenue. The development has the opportunity to take advantage of regular transit access to locations throughout the Twin Cities Metropolitan area. 3. Incorporate implementation of travel demand management strategies as part of the PUD: Because the proposed density of this mixed-use development and future office park, the implementation of travel demand strategies requires specific planning or management. The purpose of travel demand management is to spread the number of automobile trips throughout the day, reducing the negative impacts that occur during peak travel times. The Developer has submitted a draft Travel Demand Management Plan. The developer is responsible to obtain approval from the I-394 Joint Task Force. 4. Provide public plazas and designed outdoor recreation area which exceeds minimum chapter requirements: The development includes 15.7% of the gross building area for Designed Outdoor Recreation Area (DORA). A portion of the DORA is satisfied with indoor gathering spaces, including two atriums totaling 9,000 square feet. The requirement is 12% of the gross building area. It is noteworthy that the developer was able to exceed the DORA requirement even in a very dense redevelopment site that required significant road right-of-way dedication. 5. Provide a high degree of aesthetics through overall design and display of public art: The development includes a site plan that provides enhanced gathering spaces, streetscape elements, Class “A” office and upscale retail buildings, impressive and interesting architectural features, and public art opportunities. Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Page 6 Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development ZONING ANALYSIS: The scope of this analysis is limited to the new shopping center, existing restaurants, and existing offices. The hotel site is excluded from the analysis, but staff provides preliminary comments on the concept plan at the end of this report based on the limited information known at this time. Before the hotel project proceeds, the developer must apply for a PUD amendment for review and approval from the Planning Commission and City Council. The plan meets Zoning Code requirements, provided the City approves PUD modifications for parking, setbacks, and designed outdoor recreation area. Zoning Compliance Table The following table excludes the future office development east of Utica Avenue: Factor Required Proposed Met? Use Office (with CUP/PUD) Shopping Center (with PUD) Office (with CUP/PUD) Shopping Center (with PUD) Yes Lot Area 2.0 acres 35.12 acres Yes Height 240 feet, None with PUD Shopping Center: 22 – 90 ft. Existing Offices: 162 ft. Yes Building Materials 60% Class I materials 60% Class I materials Yes Parking Ramp Materials Compatible materials; or 60% Class I materials if within 20 feet of r-o-w Acid-etched precast spandrel panels (82% Class II), brick piers (19% Class I) on Bldg 34 south façade No Floor Area Ratio 1.5, None with PUD 0.85 Yes Ground Floor Area Ratio N/A 0.35 Yes Off-Street Parking See Parking Analysis Table Yes Bicycle Parking Approx. 736 stalls required for existing office and restaurants, and proposed shopping center 40% of requirement, proof of parking for remaining 60% Yes Open Area/DORA 112,170 sq. ft. (12% of Gross Floor Area) 151,060 sq. ft. (15.7%) Yes Tree Replacement 744 caliper inches 1,427 caliper Inches Yes 2,089 trees 794 trees 9,060 shrubs 5,146 shrubs Landscaping Alternative landscaping Outdoor plazas, public seating, fountain(s), public art, bus shelters, arcade with canopy, green roof Yes Setbacks None Varies Yes Mechanical Equipment Full screening required Provided Yes Sidewalks Required along all streets and building frontages Provided along all streets and building frontages Yes Refuse handling Full screening required Within buildings or enclosed areas Yes Transit service None required Served by routes 9, 604, 649 Yes Stormwater Required management Provided underground Yes Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Page 7 Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development Architectural Design The Developer is using a unique approach for construction of the tenant storefronts in the shopping center. The Developer will not design or build the individual facades, except the second-story offices, movie theater, the small retail building north of 16th Street (Building 12) and the retail building northeast of the Gamble Drive and West End Boulevard intersection (Building 33). Instead, the Developer will supply design guidelines and palettes of acceptable colors and materials to tenants and each tenant will design and build its storefront. Between tenants’ spaces a neutral column will be constructed that is repeated throughout the project. The goal is to help provide a more eclectic and lively mix in the project, and allow tenants more freedom to express a business image. A condition of approval requires revisions to the “Shops at West End Tenant Design Guidelines” to include standards relating to transparency and building entrance orientation. It is important for visitors to see/perceive what is happening in the buildings from the street and sidewalks (i.e. window shopping, outdoor dining, etc.). This helps maintain a high level of interest and activity throughout the project, draw people from store to store, and extends shopper’s stay in the project. The conditions of approval include specific standards relating that: ƒ Require a minimum percentage of windows at pedestrian level ƒ Maintain window transparency into tenant spaces ƒ Require tenants spaces located at street intersections to locate entrances at or near the corners ƒ Require at least 60 percent Class I materials on all tenant storefronts. The current design criteria would only apply to walls fronting public streets, however, this rule should also apply to West End Boulevard and the pedestrian arcade. ƒ Establish guidelines for other activities and improvements that affect the character of the development, such as the use of the sidewalks for display of merchandise and additional design criteria for awnings and canopies The grocer building (Building 11) has a very long wall along Park Place Boulevard. Unlike the rest of the shopping center, this area is will not have storefront entrances onto Park Place Boulevard and 16th Street. This design needs improvement to better address pedestrians on the west and south sides. Planning Commission review and a Minor PUD Amendment will be required for the final design of the grocer building and site when the tenant for this site prepares its plans. The buildings will meet the Class I exterior material requirements. The materials consist of brick, stone, masonry, precast concrete, EFIS, metal and wood. Parking structures will have acid-etched precast spandrel panels for the exterior material. This is a Class II material and compatible with the proposed buildings. Where the parking structure is within 20 feet of the right-of-way, the exterior must have 60 percent Class I exterior materials. This impacts the south side of the five-level parking structure ramp near Gamble Drive (Building 34). This side of the shopping center ramp has brick columns that provide only 19% Class I materials. A condition of approval is to meet the 60% requirement. Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Page 8 Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development Parking The parking plan meets the zoning code requirements by mixing uses and sharing parking among the office and shopping center components. City staff reviewed the peak hours and characteristics of the parking demand of the various uses (Parking Generation 3rd Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2004). In addition, the Developer commissioned Walker Parking Consultants to study this issue. The West End Retail Project Parking Study by Walker Parking Consultants states that parking is sufficient. However, it notes that customers may perceive a parking problem during the peak hours, of the peak week, of the peak season (last week of December). The plan deploys several strategies to make it easy for customers to park. The internal traffic circulation is simple and logical between the west and east side parking. The plan also includes pedestrian and automobile skyway connections between the proposed east parking ramp and existing office parking ramps. Retail employees will be encouraged to park in the east retail parking structure(s) to provide as much customer parking close to the stores as possible. Directional signs will be located throughout the development. In addition to the parking listed in the above table, the plan proposes approximately six one-hour on-street parking stalls along West End Boulevard (“teaser” parking) and two spaces designated for “pick-up/drop-off only”. These spaces are an important facet of West End Boulevard to allow vehicular activation of storefronts and help to slow traffic; however, additional spaces for customer drop-off/pick-up and small delivery vehicles may be needed to ensure emergency vehicle access. A condition of approval reserves the City’s authority to require more (or all) of the on-street parking to be designated as “drop-off/pick-up” only. Loading/Service Areas The number and size of loading areas meet City Code requirements. The plan generally separates loading/service areas from customer traffic by placing them within buildings or enclosed areas where they are screened from public streets. The loading areas are located at the north side of Building 11, south of Building 22, north of Building 24, and in the parking structures. Parking Provided Existing ramps – 1600 / MoneyGram Towers 1702 spaces Existing surface – restaurants 285 spaces Subtotal 1 1,987 New ramp – retail adjacent 987 spaces Underground garages 517 spaces Surface 224 spaces Subtotal 2 1,728 Total Provided 3,715 spaces Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Page 9 Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development The two truck courts on the west side of the retail project have direct accesses to Park Place Boulevard. They also dead-end in a hammerhead design. To avoid traffic problems on Park Place Boulevard and conflicts within the truck courts, access to the truck courts will be controlled. Mechanical retractable bollards located in-line with the Park Place Boulevard streetscape planter walls will be on a timer. Bollards will be up during the day/peak hours to physically restrict access near the road curb line and prevent turns from Park Place Boulevard and when the truck courts are occupied with delivery vehicles already. The bollards will retract from 8 p.m. to 10 a.m. to allow service vehicles and delivery trucks to enter the loading areas from Park Place Boulevard. Directional signs at these driveway entrances will also indicate when the loading area is full or closed and direct trucks to a staging area along the private alley. Additional signs in the staging area (alley) will indicate when the truck courts open up/clear out. Landscaping The plan meets the tree replacement requirement. The plan cannot meet the minimum number of tree and shrub plantings, so the project relies on the alternative landscaping provisions of the zoning code. The package of alternative landscaping elements includes outdoor plazas, public seating, fountain(s), public art, bus shelters, pedestrian arcade and canopy, structured soils for street trees, speed table at the intersection of 16th Street and West End Boulevard, and a partial green roof on Bldg 23 behind the second story offices. The Developer worked with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to incorporate additional best management practices over and above current requirements. Both the City Forester and SRF Consulting Group reviewed the Developer’s landscaping plans. SRF Consulting Group provided streetscape design services on the public roadways and coordinated the design with the developer. The City, SRF Consulting Group and the Developer will continue to coordinate through construction. Signs The applicant submitted a draft sign plan for the site that will require further review. Sign permits will be required. Utilities A condition of the Final PUD is that all utilities are placed underground. This includes utilities service structures, such as electrical boxes, unless they are located inconspicuously and screened entirely. There must be close coordination with small utility companies on the placement, screening and burying of these structures to maintain the high aesthetic quality of the streetscape and development. The plan includes locations for City fiber optic lines and meets the City’s needs. Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Page 10 Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development Refuse Handling All waste will be stored indoors, fully screened and not visible from public roads. The property management will handle the refuse contract(s). The loading areas with limited space (loading docks serving Buildings 22-24) propose to use compactors and fully contained units. The plan also handles grease from restaurant uses cleanly and efficiently through a central delivery and retrieval system, which pipes it to and from the restaurants. The plan also provides appropriate recycling services for tenants. PUD MODIFICATIONS: The PUD includes approval of the existing office towers to exceed Intensity Classification 6 and allows more than one principal use and building on Lot 4, Block 1 and Lots 1 and 2, Block 2 of WEST END addition. The developer requests PUD modifications for setbacks, parking and designed outdoor recreation area (DORA). These modifications are described below. Setbacks Buildings do not have to be set back from the property line in a PUD. The developer is placing buildings very near the road right-of-way to achieve an urban image. Generally, the building walls are at least five feet from the property lines; however, in some cases the building foundations will abut the right-of-way. A blanket waiver of the building setback requirements is necessary and recommended. Designed Outdoor Recreation Area (DORA) The plans exceed the DORA requirements. Included in the PUD modifications is the use of indoor gathering spaces (the retail and office atriums). Parking The parking requirement is being modified by 14% from 4,318 spaces to 3,715 spaces. This reduction is justified based on shared parking by a mix of uses with varying peak hour demands, as described in the West End Retail Project Parking Study by Walker Parking Consultants. Environmental Review An AUAR (Alternative Urban Area-wide Review) was completed in 2006 and 2007. The proposed development is different than the development scenarios, most notably, housing units are not being developed. The AUAR was adopted on April 9, 2007. Several mitigation items were discussed in the AUAR; and are included as conditions of approval as appropriate. Sanitary Sewer The project area is served by the City’s municipal sanitary sewer system and connects into the Metropolitan Council system. The sanitary sewer projections showed that with the five evaluated development scenarios, the regional sanitary sewer system would need some upgrades. The Mitigation Plan in the AUAR states that flows will be monitored as the development proceeds. If Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Page 11 Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development sewer flows exceed Metropolitan Council requirements, Duke may need to design and construct appropriate temporary peak flow storage for additional development until the Metropolitan Council interceptor is upgraded. A location for this storage area has been identified on the office area plans. Sanitary sewer flows were recalibrated using the actual proposed development and square footages. Since residential development is not included, the revised sewer flow projections show: • The retail and hotel portions of the development can be built under the existing flows, taking into account that several buildings were removed. • Two of the office buildings could be built while staying under the required Metropolitan Council guidelines. • The third and fourth office buildings have the potential for on-site detention based on projected flows if the Metropolitan sanitary sewer capacity upgrade is not completed prior to construction. The utility plans include a location and design of the temporary peak flow storage facility should it be needed. The Metropolitan Council is planning a new interceptor, and expects to construct the improvements in 2010. Water capacity The project area is and will be served by City of St. Louis Park’s water utility. The AUAR projections showed water usage could be over 90% of existing system capacity in peak periods. Since residential is not included, the water usage is reduced from the initial projections. Mitigation measures that are required include abiding by City’s water use restrictions, following state requirements for low-flow structures, and monitoring water use after Phases 1 and 2 of the redevelopment. If demand exceeds 90% of peak capacity, the City and the Developer will need to identify citywide and project-specific measures to increase water treatment capacity and reduce consumption prior to further construction. HOTEL DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW: The City is providing limited analysis and general comments on the concept plans for the hotel site. The hotel site and building plans are incomplete and require separate review and approval as a PUD amendment. The process for this later review is included as a condition of approval. ƒ The conceptual hotel site plan shows a driveway directly onto 16th Street for a drop-off. The developer shall submit revised plans to provide access off the private drive and not directly onto 16th Street. ƒ The hotel plans propose a multi-story building adjacent to the neighboring Hilton Homewood Suites development. Preliminary studies indicate the hotel will need a variance from the City’s shadow regulations. Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Page 12 Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development FINAL PLAT ANALYSIS: Description The developer proposes a Final Plat for 42.67 acres known as “West End.” The Final Plat consists of six lots, one outlot for future development, and dedication of right-of-way for Gamble Drive, Park Place Boulevard, 16th Street West, and Utica Avenue South. Staff finds the Final Plat is in substantial compliance with the previously approved Preliminary Plat with Subdivision Variances. Uses Block 1 lies north of the extended 16th Street. Within this block, there are four lots. Lots 1 and 2 cover the existing Chili’s and Olive Garden restaurants. Lot 3 is a future hotel site with structured parking. Lot 4 is a now vacant parcel that will host two buildings; proposed uses may include three fast casual restaurants, gourmet grocer, and surface parking lot. Block 2 is south of 16th Street. It contains two lots. Lot 1 contains the existing office towers (MoneyGram and 1600 Tower), operations center, and parking structure. Lot 2 is now vacant and will have a mix of uses, including movie theater, retail, office, restaurant, and two parking structures. Outlot A lies east of Utica Avenue. Duke must re-plat in order to build on this outlot in the future. The concept plans for this site include four office towers. The six lots included in the proposed plat meet all subdivision requirements for minimum lot size, shape, and dimension. Right-of-way Dedication The developer is dedicating 7.75 acres of right-of-way. The proposed street right-of-way widths for Utica Avenue and 16th Street fall within the minimum range of 70 to 110 feet required for commercial streets. The proposed right-of-way width of Gamble Drive also meets this requirement, except near the intersection of Utica Avenue where it narrows to approximately 68 feet. Drainage and Utility Easements The drainage and utility easements provided along the perimeter of the parcels are consistent with the approved Preliminary Plat and Subdivision Variances. The Final Plat now includes expanded drainage and utility easements over proposed utilities under West End Boulevard (private road), and extended easements over the underground stormwater pipe gallery to provide public access from Park Place Boulevard and 16th Street. Public Access Easements The Developer is providing public ingress and egress easements over West End Boulevard, the alley/service road, the pedestrian arcade, and the driveway connecting 16th Street to the neighboring Hilton Homewood Suites site. Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Page 13 Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development Park Dedication The developer will pay $917,700 in park dedication fees to the City of St. Louis Park with the final plat(s) for the development. Engineering Review City Engineer Scott Brink, and consulting engineer Ronald Quanbeck of TKDA Architects and Engineers, reviewed the final plat application materials. Overall, the subdivision, street, drainage, grading, utility and erosion control plans are acceptable. PUBLIC PROCESS: Citizen Committee In June 2007, the Council appointed seven members to a Citizen Committee to review the retail area design, public gathering spaces, and connections to and through the development. The Committee included members of the Planning Commission, Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission, citizens from the adjacent neighborhoods, including a Golden Valley resident, and citizens at large. The Committee met four times with city staff, city consultants and Duke Realty/Jeffrey R. Anderson Real Estate representatives from August to November. The AUAR process included several public meetings, including two neighborhood meetings: one on August 8, 2006 at the beginning of the study and one presenting the results on January 9, 2007. For these meetings, citizens from the Cedarhurst, Blackstone and the South Tyrol Hills neighborhoods were individually invited. On January 8, 2008, a neighborhood meeting was held at City Hall. Approximately 60 people attended. On January 16, 2008, a public hearing was held by the Planning Commission. One person spoke at the hearing. The City Council approved the Rezoning, Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD on February 19, 2008 and March 3, 2008. The Planning Commission reviewed the Final Plat and Final PUD on April 2, 2008, and recommended approval. Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Page 14 Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development NEXT STEPS: Assuming approval is given by the Council, the following would be expected to occur: ƒ The Developer and City will execute the first amendment to the development agreement (Planning Development Contract). ƒ The Developer will apply for PUD amendments for subsequent phases of PUD development, including the grocery store building and site plan, hotel, and office towers. These amendments require Planning Commission review and City Council approval. ƒ City staff will review and approve the Shops at West End Tenant Design Guidelines, sign plans and individual tenant façade plans. ATTACHMENTS: There were nearly 200 plans and exhibits submitted with the application. The attachments listed below are a subset of those exhibits. Paper copies of all the plans and exhibits are on file with the Community Development Department for review. General ƒ Resolutions ƒ Master Site Plan ƒ Ingress and Egress Easements ƒ Final Plat (page 2 of 6) Retail Plans ƒ Design Guidelines (includes color elevations for Buildings 11, 12 and 31) ƒ Overall Site Plan (includes bicycle parking plan) ƒ Bike Parking ƒ Parking Summary (automobile) ƒ Designed Outdoor Recreation Area (DORA) Plan ƒ Streetscape Plans, Cross Sections, Matrix of Elements ƒ Shopping Center Shadow Study Prepared by: Sean Walther, Senior Planner Meg McMonigal, Planning and Zoning Supervisor Reviewed by: Kevin Locke, Community Development Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Page 15 Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development RESOLUTION NO. 08-___ RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF THE WEST END 1551, 1621 Park Place Boulevard 1550, 1600 Utica Avenue South 5201, 5245 Wayzata Boulevard BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of St. Louis Park: Findings 1. Duke Realty, L.P., owner and subdivider of the land proposed to be platted as WEST END, submitted an application for a final plat of said subdivision in the manner required for platting of land under the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code, and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder. 2. St. Louis Park City Council Resolution 08-023 granted variances from Subdivision Code Section 26-154 “Easements” to reduce the width of drainage and utility easements. The standard width for easements along public right-of-way is 10 feet. The final plat provides drainage and utility easements that are five feet wide along public right-of-way on Lots 3 and 4, Block 1 and Lot 2, Block 2 of the proposed subdivision. In addition, the final plat provides drainage and utility easements along public right-of-way that are generally five feet wide, and three feet wide in three locations, on Lot 1, Block 2 of the proposed subdivision. 3. The proposed plat is situated upon the following described lands in Hennepin County, Minnesota, to-wit: SEE EXHIBIT A 4. The final plat is in all respects consistent with preliminary plat approval granted by Resolution 08-023, the City Plan, the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota, and the ordinances of the City of St. Louis Park. Conclusion 1. The final plat of West End is hereby approved and accepted by the City as being in accord and conformity with the preliminary plat approval granted by Resolution 08-023, all ordinances, City plans and regulations of the City of St. Louis Park, and the laws of the State of Minnesota This approval is made subject to the opinion of the City Attorney and Certification by the City Clerk, and subject to the following conditions: Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Page 16 Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development A. The site shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with the conditions of this resolution, approved Official Exhibits, and City Code. B. Approval of the final plat does not constitute approval of any site or building plans for the property. Site and building plans require City approval of a Planned Unit Development (PUD). C. Outlot A shall be re-platted into lot(s) and block(s) prior to City issuance of building permits for that property. Additional right-of-way for streets and/or streetscape may be required when Outlot A is re-platted. D. Final construction plans for public streets and public utility improvements shall be signed by a registered engineer and submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to construction. E. A Planning Development Contract shall be executed between the City and Developer that addresses, at a minimum: 1. Easements granting public ingress and egress access over West End Boulevard, the pedestrian arcade, the alley/service drive, and the private drive connecting to the adjacent Hilton Homewood Suites property, which the Developer shall file with Hennepin County when the final plat is recorded; 2. Surety in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit for proposed landscaping improvements and Redeveloper Public Improvements described in the Redevelopment Agreement between the City and Developer. The Mayor and City Manager are authorized to execute said Planning Development Contract. F. The Developer shall pay $917,750 in park dedication fees to the City of St. Louis Park prior to the City releasing the final plat for filing with Hennepin County. G. The applicant shall reimburse City attorney’s fees in drafting/reviewing such documents as required in the final plat approval. H. In addition to any other remedies, the developer or owner shall pay an administrative fee of $750 per violation of any condition of this approval. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to supply two certified copies of this Resolution to the above-named owner and subdivider, who is the applicant herein. 3. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute all contracts required herein, and the City Clerk is hereby directed to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon the said plat when all of the conditions set forth in Paragraph No. 1 above and the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code have been fulfilled. Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Page 17 Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development 4. Such execution of the certificate upon said plat by the City Clerk, as required under Section 26-123(1)j of the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code, shall be conclusive showing of proper compliance therewith by the subdivider and City officials charged with duties above described and shall entitle such plat to be placed on record forthwith without further formality. The City Clerk is instructed to record certified copies of this resolution in the Office of the Hennepin County Register of Deeds or Registrar of Titles as the case may be. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council April 28, 2008 City Manager Mayor Attest: City Clerk Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Page 18 Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development EXHIBIT A Parcel 1: Tracts B and C, Registered Land Survey No. 864, Hennepin County, Minnesota, EXCEPT that portion taken by the State of Minnesota pursuant to Partial Final Certificate recorded October 27, 1993 as Document No. 2436330. (Torrens Property-Certificate of Title No. 1012677) Parcel 2: Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 1624, Hennepin County, Minnesota, EXCEPT that portion taken by the State of Minnesota pursuant to Partial Final Certificate recorded July 21, 1993 as Document No. 2401510. Together with a perpetual easement as shown in Deed Document No. 1100087, Hennepin County, Minnesota. (Torrens Property-Certificate of Title No. 1012687) Parcel 3 (COMPLETELY WITHIN AN EXCEPTION): Tract D, Registered Land Survey No. 864, Hennepin County, Minnesota. (Torrens Property-Certificate of Title No. 1012679) Parcel 4: Tract 1: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 30, Township 29, Range 24 lying West of the East 20.87 acres thereof hereinafter called "the above described property" and lying South of the following described line: Commencing at the Southeast corner of the above described property; thence North along the East line of said above described property 705.21 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence at a right angle West to the West line of said Section 30 and there terminating, except the West 40 feet thereof and except that part thereof lying Westerly of a line run parallel with and distant 35 feet Easterly of the following described line: Line 1: Beginning at a point on the North and South Quarter line of Section 4, Township 117 North, Range 21 West distant 1897.81 feet North of the South Quarter corner thereof, thence run Southeasterly at an angle of 46 degrees 33 minutes 56 seconds from said North and South Quarter line (measured from South to East) for 45.52 feet; thence deflect to the right on a tangential curve having a radius of 381.97 feet and a delta angle of 46 degrees 11 minutes 18 seconds for 307.92 feet; thence on tangent to said curve for 28.89 feet and there terminating. Tract 2: The South 76.46 feet of the following described property to wit: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter lying West of the East 20.87 acres thereof except the West 40 feet of said tract in Section 30, Township 29, Range 24 hereinafter called the "above-described property" lying North of the following described line: Commencing at the Southeast corner of the above-described property; thence North along the East line of the above- described property 705.21 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence at a right angle West to the West line of the above-described property and there terminating. (Torrens Property as to Tracts 1 and 2-Certificate of Title No. 1012676) Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Page 19 Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development Tract 3: That part of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 30, Township 29 North, Range 24, West of the 4th Principal Meridian, lying north of a line drawn parallel with and 200 feet south, measured at right angles, from the north line of said Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4, and lying west of the southerly extension of the west line of the east 20.87 acres of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said section, except the west 40 feet thereof, all lying in Hennepin County, Minnesota. (Abstract Property as to Tract 3) Parcel 9: Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 1481, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Together with a perpetual easement as shown in Deed Document No. 1100087, Hennepin County, Minnesota. (Torrens Property-Certificate of Title No. 1012689) Parcel 10: Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 1481, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Together with a perpetual easement as shown in Deed Document No. 1100087, Hennepin County, Minnesota. (Torrens Property-Certificate of Title No. 1012690) Parcel 11: Tract B and that part of Tract C, lying North of a line drawn perpendicular to the East line of said Tract C from a point on said East line distant 49.00 feet North of the Southeast corner of said Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 1599, Hennepin County, Minnesota. EXCEPT that portion taken by the State of Minnesota pursuant to Partial Final Certificate recorded July 21, 1993 as Document No. 2401510. (Torrens Property-Certificate of Title No. 1012735) Parcel 12 (COMPLETELY WITHIN AN EXCEPTION): Tract D, Registered Land Survey No. 1647, Hennepin County, Minnesota. EXCEPT that portion taken by the State of Minnesota pursuant to Partial Final Certificate recorded July 21, 1993 as Document No. 2401510. Together with a perpetual easement as shown in Deed Document No. 1100087, Hennepin County, Minnesota. (Torrens Property-Certificate of Title No. 1012691) Parcel 13: Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 1599, Hennepin County, Minnesota. (Torrens Property-Certificate of Title No. 687548) Parcel 14: That part of the South Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 30, Township 29, Range 24 described as beginning at the Southwest corner of said South Half of the Southwest Quarter; thence Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Page 20 Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development North along the West line of said South Half of the Southwest Quarter to a point 258.6 feet South from the Southwest corner of the North 200 feet of said South Half of the Southwest Quarter; thence East at a right angle, 315 feet to the actual point of beginning; thence North at a right angle, 243 feet, more or less, to an intersection with the South line of the North 200 feet of said South Half of the Southwest Quarter; thence East along said South line to its intersection with the extension South of the West line of Registered Land Survey No. 864; thence South along said extension to a point distance 424.97 feet South from the Southwest corner of said Registered Land Survey No. 864; thence West to the point of beginning. Parcel 15: That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 30, Township 29, Range 24 described as beginning at the intersection of the West line of said Section 30 with the South line of the North 200 feet of said Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence South along said West line to the North line of Registered Land Survey No. 1481; thence Easterly along said North line 315 feet; thence Northerly at right angles to said South line of the North 200 feet; thence Westerly along said South line to the point of beginning. Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Page 21 Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development RESOLUTION NO. 08-___ A RESOLUTION APPROVING A FINAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) UNDER SECTION 36-367 OF THE ST. LOUIS PARK ORDINANCE CODE RELATING TO ZONING FOR PROPERTY ZONED O-OFFICE LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST QUADRANT OF HIGHWAYS 394 AND 100 AND RESCINDING AND REPLACING PREVIOUS RESOLUTIONS APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, SPECIAL USE PERMITS, AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS ON THE PROPERTY The West End Redevelopment Project WHEREAS, an application for approval of a Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) was received on March 3, 2008, from the applicant, and WHEREAS, the Final PUD includes two existing office buildings totaling 507,638 square feet and existing 1,700-stall parking structure, two existing restaurant buildings, a proposed hotel pad site, a new shopping center totaling 410,567 gross square feet including 34,678 gross square feet of second-story office, and two new parking structures with 1,500 parking stalls. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the Final PUD concept at the meeting of April 2, 2008, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the Final PUD, and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the staff reports and Planning Commission minutes, and WHEREAS, the application for approval of a Final PUD includes existing buildings that received previous Special Permit, Conditional Use Permit or Planned Unit Development approvals from the City of St. Louis Park, including: 1. City Council Resolution No. 86-46 granted a Special Permit (86-14-SP) for the Travelers Express Office Tower (MoneyGram) at 1550 Utica Ave South. That resolution replaced Resolutions 85-101 & 85-175. 2. City Council Resolution No. 97-123 granted a PUD Major Amendment (98-42-PUD) for the 1600 or South Office Tower at 1600 Utica Ave South to allow modifications to the building and site design for final PUD. That resolution restated and amended the initial final PUD granted under Resolution 97-123. 3. City Council Resolution No. 91-117 granted a Special Permit (91-13-SP) for a Chili’s Restaurant at 5345 Wayzata Boulevard. Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Page 22 Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development 4. City Council Resolution Nos. 93-31 and 93-101 granted Conditional Use Permits (93-9- CUP, 93-34-CUP) for an Olive Garden Restaurant at 5235 Wayzata Boulevard. BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park: Findings 1. Duke Realty Limited Partnership made application to the City Council for a Final PUD in accordance with Section 36-367 of the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code within the O – Office District for property located at located at 1551 and 1621 Park Place Boulevard, 1550 and 1600 Utica Avenue South, and 5245 Wayzata Boulevard, legally described as: Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4, Block 1 and Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, WEST END; Hennepin County, Minnesota. 2. The City Council considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission (Case No. 07-61-PUD). The City Council also considered the effect of the proposed Final PUD on the health, safety and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area, the effect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan, and compliance with the intent of the Zoning Ordinance. 3. The City Council determined that the Final PUD will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the community, will not cause serious traffic congestion and hazards with certain contemplated traffic improvements, and will not seriously depreciate surrounding property values. The Council also determined that the Final PUD is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan and that the requested PUD modifications comply with Section 36- 367(b)(5) and include modifications to: a. Yards b. Parking c. Designed Outdoor Recreation Area 4. The contents of Planning Case File 07-61-PUD are hereby entered into and made part of the record of decision for this case. Conclusion The City Council hereby rescinds and replaces previous resolutions granting conditional use permit, special use permit and planned unit development approvals on the subject property; approves the Final Planned Unit Development with yard, parking and designed outdoor recreation area Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Page 23 Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development modifications for two existing office buildings totaling 507,638 square feet and existing 1,700-stall parking structure, two existing restaurant buildings, a proposed hotel pad site, a new shopping center totaling 410,567 gross square feet including 34,678 gross square feet of second-story office, and two new parking structures with 1,500 parking stalls for the subject property based on the findings set forth above and subject to the following conditions: 1. The uses on the subject property are limited to retail, service, restaurants, hotel, theater, and office. The following uses are not allowed: in-vehicle sales and service (drive-throughs); motor fuel stations; motor vehicle sales, service and repair; car washes; currency exchanges; check cashing; pay loan agencies; pawnshops; sexually-oriented businesses, tattoo shops; gun shops (not excluding a sporting goods store that sells, as part of its sporting goods inventory, guns and ammunition). 2. The final site plan and façade design of the large retail building on Lot 4, Block 1, WEST END (proposed grocery store) shall require a PUD Minor Amendment with review and recommendation from the Planning Commission. 3. The hotel site plans for Lot 3, Block 1, WEST END shall require a PUD Major Amendment if any variances are requested. If the plan does not require a variance, the application may be processed as a PUD Minor Amendment and include review and recommendation of the Planning Commission. 4. The total gross floor area of restaurants shall be limited to 82,277 square feet. 5. The total number of seats in the movie theater shall be limited to 2,700 seats. 6. Tenants in Building 32 shall be limited to Mercantile (Group M) uses as defined in the 2007 Minnesota State Building Code, such as retail or wholesale stores, sales rooms, department stores, drug stores, markets, etc. 7. The portion of the five-level retail parking structure (Building 35) that is within 20 feet of the Gamble Drive right-of-way shall have a minimum of 60% Class I exterior materials. The Developer shall amend the Official Exhibits to comply with this requirement. 8. The Community Development Director and Zoning Administrator or their designee(s) may approve individual tenant/building façade designs administratively or refer proposals to the Planning Commission and City Council for consideration, as City staff deems necessary. 9. The sign plan is subject to Community Development Director and Zoning Administrator review and approval. Sign permits are required. 10. Access to the truck courts on the west retail block from Park Place Boulevard shall be limited to between 8 p.m. and 10 a.m. Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Page 24 Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development 11. The access will be controlled from Park Place Boulevard to the truck courts on the west retail block using a mechanical bollard system and directional signs in the Park Place Boulevard right-of-way. The Developer shall enter into a Planning Development Contract with the City of St. Louis Park that addresses this private use of public land. 12. The Developer shall maintain horizontal separation from landscaping (i.e. boulevard trees) of at least three feet from shallow underground utilities (i.e. fiber optic cable, private utilities, etc.), and eight feet horizontal separation from deeper underground utilities (i.e. water, sanitary sewer, etc.). 13. Tree plantings and street furnishings shall be located in a manner that maintains at least six feet wide clearance space in all boulevard/sidewalk areas for snow removal. 14. The Developer shall amend the Official Exhibits (The Shops at West End Design Guidelines) to incorporate the following: a. At pedestrian level, facades on Buildings 12, 22, 23, 24, 31, 32 and 33 shall be primarily transparent: 1. At least 60% of facades between 3 feet and 7 feet above the first floor elevation shall consist of pedestrian entrances, display windows or windows affording views into retail, offices, gallery or lobby space. The West End Tenant Design Guidelines shall illustrate the portions of the above referenced buildings subject to this requirement. 2. Visibility into the space shall be maintained for a minimum of three feet, but display of merchandise in this space is allowed. Display windows may be used to meet the transparency requirement. b. At pedestrian level (between 3 feet and 7 feet above the first floor elevation), building facades facing public streets, West End Boulevard, or the pedestrian arcade shall have no more than 10% of the total window area be glass block, mirrored, spandrel, frosted or other opaque glass. c. No more than 10% of the total window area of any building façade shall have signs applied to the inside or outside surface of the window. The remaining 90% of window and door area shall be clear or slightly tinted glass that allows views into and out of the building. d. Tenants in Buildings 12, 22, 24, 31, and 33 that are located adjacent to public and/or private street intersections shall locate entrances at or near the adjacent building corner. e. Awnings and canopies shall be made of heavy canvas, fabric, metal and/or glass. Plastic and vinyl awnings are prohibited. Backlit awnings and canopies are prohibited. Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Page 25 Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development 15. A business may use the sidewalk within five feet of its building wall for the following purposes, provided the business maintains a clear walkway that is at least eight feet wide along Park Place Boulevard and at least six feet wide along other streets, and provided the uses do not occur in the public right-of-way: a. Display of merchandise, not to exceed 100 square feet per business; b. Benches, planters, ornaments, art; c. Signs permitted in the zoning ordinance; and d. Outdoor dining. Outdoor dining areas may extend farther than five-feet from the building wall, provided table and chairs or other obstructions are not in the public right-of-way, and provided businesses maintain the required horizontal clearance for a walkway between the dining area and other obstructions, such as trees, poles, and curbs. 16. The Developer shall provide easements and $285,000 for public art to help satisfy the alternative landscaping requirements. The City and the Developer will develop a public process to select the artists, artworks and locations. 17. The Developer shall amend Official Exhibits (utility plans) to provide separate domestic and fire water service lines to the buildings. 18. The developer shall work with the Police Department on the design and construction of the police substation area in Building 31. In particular, the plan shall provide windows and doorway on the northeast building elevation along the alley. 19. The developer shall redesign the public restroom entrances in the Building 31 atrium to have open entrances (no exterior doors to the atrium), similar to typical stadium/movie theater restroom entrances, as requested by the Police Department. 20. At City of St. Louis Park’s sole discretion, and upon conferring with the property owner, the property owner shall change the designation of West End Boulevard on-street parking stalls from short-term customer parking to “pick-up/drop-off only” (or similar restriction). 21. The applicant shall be responsible to obtain all permits from the City and other agencies. 22. The property owner(s) shall be responsible for obtaining a City license for all parking structures. 23. Tenants shall be responsible for obtaining all City licenses (i.e. grocery store, hotel, etc.). Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Page 26 Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development 24. The property owner shall prepare and effectuate traffic management plans that reduce traffic congestion. The property owner submitted a plan for review and approval of the by the St. Louis Park and Golden Valley I-394 Joint Task Force. The property owner shall implement the Traffic Management Plan (TMP) approved by the Travel Demand Management Joint Task Force prior to City issuance of a certificate of occupancy. 25. The City and Developer shall set up a monitoring program to determine actual sanitary sewer flows. Following each phase of the development, sewer flows will be analyzed to determine if sewer flows exceed Metropolitan Council limits described in the Metropolitan Council’s letter to the City of St. Louis Park dated December 14, 2006. If sanitary sewer flows exceed said limits, the Developer shall submit a final design of a privately owned, privately maintained, temporary sanitary sewer peak flow detention facilities for Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) and City of St. Louis Park approval. The Developer shall construct the said approved system and put it into operation in the timeframe designated by MCES and City of St. Louis Park, and prior to City issuance of building permits for additional phases. 26. The Developer shall abide by the City’s water use restrictions and follow State of Minnesota requirements for low-flow structures. After each phase of the redevelopment, water usage shall be monitored. If monitoring shows use exceeds 90% of peak capacity, the Developer shall cooperate with the City to identify citywide and project-specific measures to increase water treatment capacity and reduce consumption prior to City issuance of building permits. 27. The north office tower and operations center at 1551 Utica Avenue (Lot 1, Block 2, WEST END) shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with the Official Exhibits from Zoning Application 86-14-SP and 07-61-PUD. If there is any conflict between the Official Exhibits, 07-61-PUD shall supersede. The following 86-14-SP Official Exhibits are incorporated by reference herein: Exhibit A – Site Plan and Lighting Plan; Exhibit B – Grading Plan; Exhibit C – Utilities Plan; Exhibit D – Landscape Plan; Exhibit E – Building Elevations; Exhibit F – Basement Floor Level Plan; Exhibit G – Ground Floor Plan; Exhibit H – Second Floor Plan; and Exhibit I – Typical Floor Plan, as modified by City Development on March 13, 1986. (The floor plans are included to show general use and configurations only.) 28. The following conditions shall apply to the south office tower at 1600 Utica Avenue (Lot 1, Block 2, WEST END): a. The site shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with the Official Exhibits from Zoning Application 98-42-PUD and 07-61-PUD. If there is any conflict between the Official Exhibits, 07-61-PUD shall supersede. The following 98-42-PUD Official Exhibits are incorporated by reference herein: Exhibit A – Site Plan, Exhibit B – Landscape Plan, Exhibit C – Existing Survey, Exhibit D – Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan, Exhibit E – Utility Plan, Exhibit F – East Elevations, Exhibit G – North Elevation, Exhibit H – South Elevation, Exhibit Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Page 27 Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development I – West Elevations, Exhibit J – West Elevation-Parking Ramp, and Exhibit K – Parking Ramp elevation (south). b. Parking ramp layouts and site plan shall provide designation of at least 20 bicycle racks and at least 20 carpool spaces in convenient locations. c. A covenant shall be recorded on the property which specifies that a minimum of 4,000 square feet of the atrium shall remain in perpetuity as indoor open space and available for general “public” use. Said interior atrium space shall be designed in an aesthetically pleasing and usable way, with landscaping, benches, and the like. A detailed atrium plan shall be submitted and approved by the Community Development Director and the Zoning Administrator. d. The following modifications to ordinance requirements are re-authorized: 1. The floor area ratio for the PUD can be 1.57. 2. The setbacks on Gamble Drive for the parking ramp can be 17 feet. 3. Reduced office building setback along Gamble Drive of 96 feet. 29. The Chili’s restaurant site at 5245 Wayzata Boulevard (Lot 2, Block 1, WEST END) shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with the Official Exhibits from Zoning Applications 91-13-SP and 07-61-PUD. If there is any conflict between the Official Exhibits, 07-61-PUD shall supersede. The following 91-13-SP Official Exhibits are incorporated by reference herein: Exhibit A – Overall Site Plan, Exhibit B – Site Plan, Exhibit C – Grading Plan, Exhibit D – Landscape Plan, Exhibit E – Floor Plan, and Exhibit F and F-1 – Elevations. 30. The Olive Garden restaurant site at 5235 Wayzata Boulevard (Lot 1, Block 1, WEST END) shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with the Official Exhibits from Zoning Applications 93-9-CUP, 93-34-CUP and 07-61-PUD. If there is any conflict between the Official Exhibits, 07-61-PUD shall supersede. The following 93-9-CUP and 93-34-CUP Official Exhibits are incorporated by reference herein: Exhibit A-1 – Site Plan, Exhibit B – Utility Plan, Exhibit C-1 – Landscape Plan, and Exhibit D – Exterior Elevations. 31. Prior to issuance of building permits, the following conditions shall be met: a. A Planning Development Contract shall be executed between the Developer and City that addresses, at a minimum: 1. Conditions of PUD approval as applicable or appropriate; 2. Public use of gathering spaces in the development; 3. Private use of public land 4. Maintenance agreement and/or special service district; 5. Surety in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit for Redeveloper Public Improvements and landscaping; and Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Page 28 Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development 6. Administrative approval of modifications to the PUD plans. The Mayor and City Manager are authorized to execute said Planning Development Contract. b. The Developer shall provide a surety to the City of St. Louis Park in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit for 1.10 times the estimated Redeveloper Public Improvements costs (as defined in the Redevelopment Agreement), and 1.25 times the estimated landscaping costs. c. The property owner shall pay the applicable Traffic Management Administrative Fee. 1. The portion of the shopping center subject to this fee is on Lot 2, Block 2, WEST END. The total fee of $34,633 shall be paid to the City of St. Louis Park prior to City issuance of building permits. 2. Subsequent phases of the PUD (future hotel and office towers) shall pay fifty percent of the fee upon submission of a Final PUD Amendment application, and the remaining fifty percent of the fee upon submission of a building permit application, for each respective development phase. In addition to any other remedies, the developer or owner shall pay an administrative fee of $750 per violation of any condition of this approval. Pursuant to Section 36-367(e)(6) of the Zoning Ordinance, the City will require execution of a development agreement as a condition of approval of the Final P.U.D. The development agreement shall address those issues which the City Council deems appropriate and necessary. The Mayor and City Manager are authorized to execute the development agreement. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council February 19, 2008 City Manager Mayor Attest: City Clerk N1W1W2W3W4W5W6E4E5E2E1N2EXISTING MONEYGRAM EXISTING 1600 TOWER EXISTING RAMPEXISTING OPERATIONS CENTERE3 PARK PLACE BOULEVARD GAMBLE DRIVE WEST END BOULEVARD16TH STREETHOTEL PAD SITEPROPOSED PARKING STRUCTUREPEDESTRIAN ACCESSOFFICE TOWER 2OFFICE TOWER3OFFICE TOWER 1OFFICE TOWER4EXISTINGHEALTH PARTNERSoutdoor gathering spacesindoor gathering spaces (~5000 sf)pedestrian connectiontransit stop / bus sheltersOVERALL SITE PLANTHEATER/PARKING SECOND LEVEL(LOBBY) (OFFICE) E3 W3 W4(SKYWAY ABOVE) SKYWAY SKYWAY UNDERGROUNDPARKING (1000 STALLS) (500 STALLS) NEW 5 LEVEL PARKING STRUCTURE223333443111111Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development Page 29 Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development Page 30 Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development Page 31 Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development Page 32 Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development Page 33 Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development Page 34 Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development Page 35 1060.002.02 I 09 january 2008desIgn guIdelInes N1 1-RETAIL W1 1-RETAIL W2 1-RETAIL W3 1-RETAIL W4 1-RETAIL N2 1-RETAIL EXISTING MONEYGRAMEXISTING 1600 TOWEREXISTING RAMP EXISTING OPERATIONS CENTER PARK PLACE BOULEVARD GAMBLE DRIVE WEST END BOULEVARD16TH STREET HOTEL PAD SITE PROPOSED PARKING STRUCTURE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS OFFICE TOWER 2 OFFICE TOWER 3 OFFICE TOWER 1 OFFICE TOWER 4 EXISTING HEALTH PARTNERS OVerall sITe Plan (SKYWAY ABOVE) W3 1-RETAIL 2-OFFICE W4 1-RETAIL 2-OFFICE W5 1-RETAIL W6 1-RETAIL E5 1-RETAIL E4 1-RETAIL E2 1-RETAIL 2 CINEMA E1 1-RETAIL 2 CINEMA E3 LOBBY PARKING STRUCTURE 1200 SPACES PARK BELOW PARK BELOW pr o j e c T Vi S ion & Go a l S : 1. Th e m a S T e r p l a n f o r Th e Sh o p S a T We S T en d W a S c o n c e i V e d T o c r e a T e a S e n S e o f p l a c e ; a T r u e d e S T i - n a T i o n . By e x T e n d i n G T h e r e T a i l e x p e r i e n c e T o pa r k pl a c e Bl V d ., T h e d e V e l o p m e n T n o T o n l y e n G a G e S T h e c o m m u n i T y , B u T W i T h T h e Sh o p p i n G a r c a d e ’S i n T e r f a c e T o T h i S m a j o r ST. lo u i S pa r k Bo u l e V a r d , i T a l S o p r o - V i d e S f o r a m a j o r G a T e W a y c o n n e c T i o n T o T h e h e a r T o f T h e p r o j e c T . Th e Sh o p p i n G ar c a d e W i l l a l S o p r o V i d e f o r a n i n T i m a T e , c o V e r e d r e T a i l e x p e r i e n c e T h a T W i l l B e p r o m i n e n T l y V i e W e d f r o m T h o S e W h o a p p r o a c h T h e S i T e . 16T h ST r e e T ’S r e S T a u r a n T z o n e W i l l p r o V i d e a n a c T i V e c o n n e c T i o n T o B o T h e x i S T i n G a n d p l a n n e d o f f i c e T o W e r S T o T h e ea S T o f T h e S i T e a n d W i T h a m i x o f i n d o o r a n d o u T d o o r d i n i n G , W i l l c r e a T e a V i B r a n T n i G h T l i f e . We S T en d Bo u l e V a r d , W i T h G r o u n d l e V e l r e T a i l o n B o T h S i d e S , a n d u p p e r l e V e l o f f i c e S p a c e o n T h e We S T S i d e W i l l B e T h e a c T i V e h e a r T o f T h e p r o j e c T , a n d a l S o p r o V i d e T h e o p p o r T u n i T y f o r p u B l i c G a T h e r i n G . 2. Wi T h ST. lo u i S pa r k ’S S e T T i n G a S a f i r S T -r i n G S u B - u r B , a n d i T S d i r e c T c o n n e c T i o n T o d o W n T o W n mi n n e a p o - l i S , T h e o V e r a l l d e S i G n p h i l o S o p h y f o r T h e p r o j e c T i S T o c r e a T e a T i m e l e S S , “ur B a n ed G e ” d e V e l o p m e n T T h a T W i l l B r i n G a n e W V i B r a n T e n e r G y T o T h i S a r e a o f T h e c i T y . Th e h i G h d e n S i T y o f T h e o V e r a l l S i T e , a S W e l l a S T h e B u i l d i n G d e S i G n W i l l f u r T h e r a d V a n c e T h i S n o T i o n . By a l l o W i n G T e n a n T S G r e a T f l e x i B i l i T y in f a c a d e d e S i G n , T h e p r o j e c T W i l l i n c o r p o r a T e V a r y i n G S T o r e f r o n T S , p a r a p e T h e i G h T , c a n o p i e S a n d m a T e r i a l S e l e c T i o n S , a n d a l l o W T e n a n T S T o i n c o r p o r a T e T h e i r o W n l o o k . Th i S i S c o n S i S - T e n T W i T h T h e i m a G e o f a n u r B a n S T r e e T S c a p e , W h e r e T h i S V a r i e T y c r e a T e S a V e r y a c T i V e a n d l i V e ly f a B r i c . 3. Wi T h 1,500 S T r u c T u r e d p a r k i n G S T a l l S o n S i T e , W e a r e e n c o u r a G i n G p e d e S T r i a n T r a f f i c T h r o u G h o u T a l l a S p e c T S o f o u r p r o j e c T a n d c e l e B r a T i n G a n o u T d o o r l i f e S T y l e . Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit DevelopmentPage 36 1060.002.02 I 09 january 2008desIgn guIdelInes nW Si t e iS o M e t r i c pr o j e c T Vi S ion & Go a l S : 1. Th e m a S T e r p l a n f o r Th e Sh o p S a T We S T en d W a S c o n c e i V e d T o c r e a T e a S e n S e o f p l a c e ; a T r u e d e S T i - n a T i o n . By e x T e n d i n G T h e r e T a i l e x p e r i e n c e T o pa r k pl a c e Bl V d ., T h e d e V e l o p m e n T n o T o n l y e n G a G e S T h e c o m m u n i T y , B u T W i T h T h e Sh o p p i n G a r c a d e ’S i n T e r f a c e T o T h i S m a j o r ST. lo u i S pa r k Bo u l e V a r d , i T a l S o p r o - V i d e S f o r a m a j o r G a T e W a y c o n n e c T i o n T o T h e h e a r T o f T h e p r o j e c T . Th e Sh o p p i n G a r c a d e W i l l a l S o p r o V i d e f o r a n i n T i m a T e , c o V e r e d r e T a i l e x p e r i e n c e T h a T W i l l B e p r o m i n e n T l y V i e W e d f r o m T h o S e W h o a p p r o a c h T h e S i T e . 16T h ST r e e T ’S r e S T a u r a n T z o n e W i l l p r o V i d e a n a c T i V e c o n n e c T i o n T o B o T h e x i S T i n G a n d p l a n n e d o f f i c e T o W e r S T o T h e ea S T o f T h e S i T e a n d W i T h a m i x o f i n d o o r a n d o u T d o o r d i n i n G , W i l l c r e a T e a V i B r a n T n i G h T l i f e . We S T en d Bo u l e V a r d , W i T h G r o u n d l e V e l r e T a i l o n B o T h S i d e S , a n d u p p e r l e V e l o f f i c e S p a c e o n T h e We S T S i d e W i l l B e T h e a c T i V e h e a r T o f T h e p r o j e c T , a n d a l S o p r o V i d e T h e o p p o r T u n i T y f o r p u B l i c G a T h e r i n G . 2. Wi T h ST. lo u i S pa r k ’S S e T T i n G a S a f i r S T -r i n G S u B - u r B , a n d i T S d i r e c T c o n n e c T i o n T o d o W n T o W n mi n n e a p o - l i S , T h e o V e r a l l d e S i G n p h i l o S o p h y f o r T h e p r o j e c T i S T o c r e a T e a T i m e l e S S , “ur B a n ed G e ” d e V e l o p m e n T T h a T W i l l B r i n G a n e W V i B r a n T e n e r G y T o T h i S a r e a o f T h e c i T y . Th e h i G h d e n S i T y o f T h e o V e r a l l S i T e , a S W e l l a S T h e B u i l d i n G d e S i G n W i l l f u r T h e r a d V a n c e T h i S n o T i o n . By a l l o W i n G T e n a n T S G r e a T f l e x i B i l i T y in f a c a d e d e S i G n , T h e p r o j e c T W i l l i n c o r p o r a T e V a r y i n G S T o r e f r o n T S , p a r a p e T h e i G h T , c a n o p i e S a n d m a T e r i a l S e l e c T i o n S , a n d a l l o W T e n a n T S T o i n c o r p o r a T e T h e i r o W n l o o k . Th i S i S c o n S i S - T e n T W i T h T h e i m a G e o f a n u r B a n S T r e e T S c a p e , W h e r e T h i S V a r i e T y c r e a T e S a V e r y a c T i V e a n d l i V e ly f a B r i c . 3. Wi T h 1,500 S T r u c T u r e d p a r k i n G S T a l l S o n S i T e , W e a r e e n c o u r a G i n G p e d e S T r i a n T r a f f i c T h r o u G h o u T a l l a S p e c T S o f o u r p r o j e c T a n d c e l e B r a T i n G a n o u T d o o r l i f e S T y l e . Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit DevelopmentPage 37 1060.002.02 I 09 january 2008desIgn guIdelInes pr o j e c T Vi S ion im a G e r y : 1. Bo T h c o V e r e d a n d u n c o V e r e d p e d e S T r i a n z o n e S W i l l c e l - e B r a T e a n o u T d o o r l i f e S T y l e W h i l e a l S o o f f e r i n G p l a c e S o f p r o T e c T i o n f r o m T h e e l e m e n T S a n d a r e a S o f r e S T . 2. Th i S p r o j e c T W i l l e m B r a c e a n d c e l e B r a T e p e d e S T r i a n S h o p - p i n G z o n e S . Th e r e T a i l a r e a S n e a r T h e a r c a d e , a S W e l l a S We S T en d Bl V d in p a r T i c u l a r W i l l f o c u S o n l i V e ly p e d e S T r i a n c o n n e c - T i o n S . 3. Th e d e V e l o p m e n T W i l l e n c o u r a G e T h e u S e o f V o l u m i n o u S , W e l l -l i T S T o r e f r o n T S a n d f a c a d e S . Si G n a G e , W h e r e a p p r o p r i - a T e , S h o u l d B e d i r e c T e d n o T o n l y o u T W a r d f r o m T h e f a c a d e , B u T p e r p e n d i c u l a r T o W a l k i n G p a T T e r n S a S W e l l . 4. Si G n a G e e l e m e n T S T h a T a r e p e r p e n d i c u l a r T o p e d e S T r i a n r o u T e S , a S W e l l a S T h e u S e o f p e d e S T r i a n -S c a l e l i G h T i n G f i x - T u r e S W i l l B e p r o m o T e d . 5. a c o m m u n i T y -B a S e d S p a c e W i l l B e l o c a T e d a l o n G We S T en d Bl V d ., a n d W i l l i n T r o d u c e l a r G e a r e a S o f c u r T a i n -W a l l G l a S S a n d i n T e r e S T i n G c a n o p i e S /r o o f f o r m S T o p r o V i d e a n e a S i ly -r e c - o G n i z e d m e e T i n G S p a c e f o r u S e B y T h e G e n e r a l p u B l i c . 6. To p r o m o T e T h e o V e r a l l d e S i G n c o n c e p T o f p r o V i d i n G a n “ur B a n ed G e ” d e V e l o p m e n T , V a r i e d u S e o f f a c a d e m a T e r i a l S , S T o r e f r o n T S , a n d d e S i G n S W i l l B e e n c o u r a G e d T o p r o m o T e T h e “i n f i l l l o o k ” o f a n u r B a n S e T T i n G . 7. pe d e S T r i a n S h o p p i n G a r e a S W i l l i n c o r p o r a T e p a T T e r n e d p a V - i n G a r e a S T o c r e a T e V i S u a l i n T e r e S T in T h e p r o j e c T . 8. Th e i n c o r p o r a T i o n o f c a n o p y a n d T r e l l i S e l e m e n T S a T V a r i - o u S e l e V a T i o n S a n d l o c a T i o n S W i l l B e e n c o u r a G e d T o p r o V i d e a n d i n T e r e S T i n G a n d l ay e r e d S T r e e T S c a p e a n d e x p e r i e n c e . 9. re S T a u r a n T p r e m i S e S W i l l e n c o u r a G e T h e u S e o f a r e a S f o r o u T d o o r S i d e W a l k S e a T i n G . Th i S W i l l p r o V i d e a S e n S e o f l i f e a n d o V e r a l l a c T i V i T y T o T h e S T r e e T e x p e r i e n c e . 10. To W e r e l e m e n T S a n d a r e a S o f r a i S e d p a r a p e T S m u S T B e u S e d W i T hin T e n a n T d e S i G n S T o a d d i n T e r e S T , a n d T h e S e n S e o f V a r i e d m a S S i n G S T o T h e o V e r a l l B u i l d i n G f a c a d e S . 11. Ta l l , o r T W o S T o r y B u i l d i n G f a c a d e S , W h i c h W i l l B e l o c a T e d r e l a T i V e ly c l o S e T o T h e e d G e o f T h e S T r e e T W i l l p r o V i d e f o r a n “u r B a n ” f e e l . Th e u S e o f c a n o p i e S in T h e S e a r e a S W i l l f u r T h e r r e i n f o r c e T h e p e d e S T r i a n S c a l e o f T h e S T r e e T e x p e r i e n c e . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit DevelopmentPage 38 1060.002.02 I 09 january 2008desIgn guIdelInes pr o j e c T de S i G n im a G e r y : 1. Th e c o V e r e d a r c a d e B e T W e e n B u i l d i n G S W3 a n d W4 i S o n e o f T h e m o S T i m p o r T a n T a r c h i T e c - T u r a l e l e m e n T S o f T h e p r o j e c T . By m a k i n G a B o l d p r e S e n c e o n T o pa r k pl a c e Bl V d ., i T c r e a T e S a G a T e W a y T o T h e p r o j e c T a n d o f f e r S o p p o r T u n i T y f o r T e n a n T a n d p r o j e c T S i G n a G e . 2. Th i S e l e m e n T a l S o c r e a T e S a S T r o n G S e n S e o f p l a c e a n d a n i n T i m a T e S h o p p i n G e x p e r i e n c e f o r p e o p l e . 3. Th e p e d e S T r i a n a r c a d e W i l l B e c o n S T r u c T e d o f a c o m B i n a T i o n o f S T e e l S h a p e S f o r T h e S T r u c T u r e a n d T r a n S l u c e n T ka l W a l l p a n e l S f o r T h e S k i n . Th i S W i l l a l l o W l i G h T T o T r a n S m i T i n T o T h e S p a c e , W h i l e S T i l l G i V in G p r o T e c T i o n f r o m T h e e l e m e n T S . 4. la n d S c a p e a n d h a r d S c a p e e l e m e n T S W i T hin T h e S p a c e W i l l c o n S i S T o f S o m e S m a l l o r n a m e n T a l T r e e S a n d p o T T e d p l a n T i n G S , p a T T e r n e d p a V i n G T o c r e a T e V i S u a l i n T e r e S T , a n d B e n c h S e a T i n G a r e a S f o r p e o p l e T o G a T h e r a n d r e S T . 5. Te n a n T S T o r e f r o n T S a n d d e S i G n f e a T u r e S S h o W n a r e r e p r e S e n T a T i V e o f T h e d e S i r e d o V e r - a l l c h a r a c T e r f o r T h e d e V e l o p m e n T a n d a r e n o T S p e c i f i c a l l y B a S e d u p o n a c T u a l T e n a n T f a ç a d e d e S i G n S . iT i S T h e i n T e n T o f T h e d e V e l o p m e n T T o a l l o W f o r T h e c r e a T i V e i m p l e m e n T a T i o n o f S p e c i f i c T e n a n T n a T i o n a l o r r e G i o n a l d e S i G n p a r a m e T e r S a n d i c o n i c i m a G e r y i n T o T h e o V e r a l l f a ç a d e o f T h e c e n T e r . Vi e W o f a r c a d e f r o M Pa r k PL a c e Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit DevelopmentPage 39 1060.002.02 I 09 january 2008desIgn guIdelInes pr o j e c T de S i G n im a G e r y : 1. Th e We S T en d Bo u l e V a r d S h o p p i n G e x p e r i e n c e h a S B e e n d e S i G n e d T o B e a n a c T i V e a n d l i V e ly e x p e - r i e n c e f o r a l l p a T r o n S . Th e d e S i G n f o S T e r S T h e l o o k a n d f e e l o f a n u r B a n S T r e e T , o r c i T y B l o c k . TW o -S T o r y , o r T a l l f a c a d e S , a S W e l l a S T h e r e l a - T i V e ly c l o S e B u i l d i n G p l a c e m e n T o n B o T h S i d e S o f T h e S T r e e T e n h a n c e T h i S z o n e a S a d e n S e “p l a c e T o B e .” 2. pe d e S T r i a n S c a l e l i G h T f i x T u r e S , W i T h B a n n e r S , a n d p o S S i B ly p o T T e d p l a n T S G i V e T h i S a r e a o f T h e p r o j e c T a V e r y h u m a n S c a l e . 3. aG a i n , T h e d i f f e r e n T i a T i o n o f T e n a n T f a c a d e S , V a r i e d S T o r e f r o n T a n d c a n o p y d e S i G n a n d h e i G h T S a r e i n T e n d e d T o a p p ly a n “ur B a n ed G e ” f e e l . Ve r T i c a l a r c h i T e c T u r a l f e a T u r e S W i l l i d e n T i f y m a j o r n o d e S W i T hin T h e S h o p p i n G e x p e r i e n c e . on o n e S i d e o f T h e S T r e e T , a G l a S S c u r T a i n W a l l W i T h a n a r c h e d r o o f f o r m r e p r e S e n T S T h e p e d e S T r i a n e n T r y T o T h e a r c a d e a r e a , a n d o n T h e o T h e r i T r e p r e S e n T S T h e e n T r y T o T h e p r o p o S e d T h e a T r e a n d c o m m u n i T y S p a c e S . 4. Te n a n T S T o r e f r o n T S a n d d e S i G n f e a T u r e S S h o W n a r e r e p r e S e n T a T i V e o f T h e d e S i r e d o V e r - a l l c h a r a c T e r f o r T h e d e V e l o p m e n T a n d a r e n o T S p e c i f i c a l l y B a S e d u p o n a c T u a l T e n a n T f a ç a d e d e S i G n S . iT i S T h e i n T e n T o f T h e d e V e l o p m e n T T o a l l o W f o r T h e c r e a T i V e i m p l e m e n T a T i o n o f S p e c i f i c T e n a n T n a T i o n a l o r r e G i o n a l d e S i G n p a r a m e T e r S a n d i c o n i c i m a G e r y i n T o T h e o V e r a l l f a ç a d e o f T h e c e n T e r . Vi e W o f We S t en d BL V d . Lo o k i n g no r t h Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit DevelopmentPage 40 1060.002.02 I 09 january 2008desIgn guIdelInes pr o j e c T i m a G e r y : 1. a S i G n i f i c a n T G l a S S c u r T a i n -W a l l d e S i G n e l e m e n T f o r We S T en d Bo u l e V a r d ’S W e S T e r n e x p o S u r e i S T h e p u B l i c a T r i u m , W h i c h W i l l h o u S e T h e m a i n e n T r y p o i n T f o r T h e m o V i e T h e a T e r a S W e l l a S T h e c o m m u n i T y S p a c e f o r T h e p r o j e c T . Th e u S e o f V a r i e d p a r a p e T h e i G h T S a n d f o r m S , c a n o p y e l e m e n T S , S T o r e f r o n T S , m a T e r i a l S , e T c ., a T e a c h T e n a n T p r o m o T e S T h e “ur- B a n ed G e ” c o n c e p T . du e T o T h e r e l a T i V e ly n a r r o W f e e l o f T h i S a r e a , S i G n a G e S h o u l d B e m u l T i -d i r e c - T i o n a l in n a T u r e T h r o u G h T h e u S e o f S u p p l e m e n T a l B l a d e S i G n a G e a n d /o r c a n o p y S i G n a G e . a l a n d l o r d c o n S T r u c T e d T o W e r e l e m e n T a T T h e S o u T h e r n e n d o f T h i S e l e V a T i o n W i l l S i G nify T h e e n T r a n c e S e q u e n c e i n T o T h i S r e T a i l z o n e f o r p a T r o n S e n T e r i n G f r o m T h e So u T h . a m a T c h i n G T o W e r e l e m e n T o n T h e o p p o S i T e S i d e o f T h e S T r e e T W i l l e f f e c T i V e ly f o r m a n “en T r y Ga T e W a y ” i n T o T h i S S h o p p i n G d i S T r i c T . 2. a S imilar c u r T a i n -W a l l e l e m e n T o n T h i S e l e V a - T i o n S i G nifie S T h e p e d e S T r i a n e n T r y i n T o T h e a r c a d e S h o p p i n G z o n e f r o m We S T en d Bo u l e V a r d . up p e r l e V e l o f f i c e S p a c e W i l l B e l o c a T e d a B o V e G r o u n d l e V e l r e T a i l a l o n G T h e We S T S i d e o f T h e S T r e e T T o f u r T h e r r e i n f o r c e a n u r B a n f e e l . Va r i e d p a r a p e T h e i G h T S a n d f o r m S W i l l a G a i n B e u T i l i z e d T o m i m i c T h e f a B r i c a n d a r c h i T e c T u r e l o c a T e d a T T h e o p p o S i T e S i d e o f T h e S T r e e T . Te n a n T S W i l l a G a i n B e e n c o u r - a G e d T o u S e V a r i e d p a r a p e T h e i G h T S a n d f o r m S , c a n o p y e l e m e n T S , S T o r e f r o n T S , m a T e r i a l S , e T c ., a T T h e i r f a ç a d e in a W a y T h a T r e m a i n S T r u e T o T h e o V e r - a l l c o n c e p T . ad d i T i o n a l l y , T e n a n T S in T h i S a r e a W i l l B e r e q u i r e d T o p r o V i d e S u i T a B l e d e S i G n S f o r e a c h T r a n S i T i o n f r o m T h e i r i n d i V i d u a l T e n a n T f a c a d e S T o T h e d e V e l o p e r -p r o V i d e d o f f i c e f a ç a d e . a l a n d l o r d - c o n S T r u c T e d T o W e r e l e m e n T W i l l c o m p l e T e T h e e n - T r y G a T e W a y f o r p a T r o n S e n T e r i n G f r o m T h e So u T h . 3. Te n a n T S T o r e f r o n T S a n d d e S i G n f e a T u r e S S h o W n a r e r e p r e S e n T a T i V e o f T h e d e S i r e d o V e r a l l c h a r a c - T e r f o r T h e d e V e l o p m e n T a n d a r e n o T S p e c i f i c a l l y B a S e d u p o n a c T u a l T e n a n T f a ç a d e d e S i G n S . iT i S T h e i n T e n T o f T h e d e V e l o p m e n T T o a l l o W f o r T h e c r e - a T i V e i m p l e m e n T a T i o n o f S p e c i f i c T e n a n T n a T i o n a l o r r e G i o n a l d e S i G n p a r a m e T e r S a n d i c o n i c i m a G e r y i n T o T h e o V e r a l l f a ç a d e o f T h e c e n T e r . 1 Bu i L d i n g S e3, a n d e4 We S t co n c e P t eL e V a t i o n 2 Bu i L d i n g S W3 & W4 ea S t co n c e P t eL e V a t i o n Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit DevelopmentPage 41 1060.002.02 I 18 February 2008THeaTer eLeVaTION STuDy Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit DevelopmentPage 42 Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development Page 43 Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development Page 44 1060.002.02 I 09 january 2008desIgn guIdelInes cu L t u r e d St o n e fi n i S h e S ex T e r i o r ma T e r i a l S : Th e m a T e r i a l S S h o W n a r e r e p r e S e n T a T i V e o f T h e f a m i l y o f c o l o r S p r e f e r r e d T o T h e d e S i G n o f T h e p r o j e c T . ho W e V e r , a d d i T i o n a l m a T e r i a l S a n d c o l o r S n o T S h o W n h e r e m a y B e p r o p o S e d B y T h e T e n a n T . al l T e n a n T d e S i G n S a r e S u B j e c T T o a p p r o V a l B y l a n d l o r d & l a n d l o r d ’S a r c h i T e c T : a. cl a S S e S o f m a T e r i a l S . ma T e r i a l S S h a l l B e d i V i d e d i n T o c l a S S i, c l a S S ii a n d c l a S S iii c a T e G o r i e S a S f o l l o W S : 1. cl a S S i. Br i c k , m a r B l e , G r a n i T e o r o T h e r n a T u r a l S T o n e , T e x T u r e d c e m e n T S T u c c o , c o p - p e r , p o r c e l a i n a n d G l a S S a r e c l a S S i e x T e - r i o r B u i l d i n G m a T e r i a l S . 2. cl a S S ii. ex p o S e d a G G r e G a T e c o n c r e T e p a n e l S , B u r n i S h e d c o n c r e T e B l o c k , i n T e - G r a l c o l o r e d S p l i T f a c e (r o c k f a c e ) a n d e x p o S e d a G G r e G a T e c o n c r e T e B l o c k , c a S T -in - p l a c e c o n c r e T e , a r T i f i c i a l S T u c c o (e.i.f.S., dr y V i T ), a r T i f i c i a l S T o n e , f i B e r -r e i n f o r c e d c e m e n T B o a r d S i d i n G W i T h a m i n i m u m T h i c k n e S S o f ¼ i n c h , a n d p r e f i n i S h e d m e T a l . 3. cl a S S iii. un p a i n T e d o r S u r f a c e p a i n T e d c o n c r e T e B l o c k (S c o r e d o r u n S c o r e d ), u n p a i n T e d o r S u r f a c e p a i n T e d p l a i n o r r i B B e d c o n c r e T e p a n e l S , a n d u n f i n i S h e d o r S u r f a c e p a i n T e d m e T a l . B. mi n i m u m c l a S S i m a T e r i a l S . aT l e a S T 60 p e r c e n T o f e a c h B u i l d i n G f a c e V i S i B l e f r o m o f f T h e S i T e m u S T B e o f c l a S S i m a T e r i a l S . no T m o r e T h a n 10 p e r c e n T o f e a c h B u i l d - i n G f a c e V i S i B l e f r o m o f f T h e S i T e m a y B e o f c l a S S iii m a T e r i a l S . po r T i o n S o f B u i l d i n G S n o T V i S i B l e f r o m o f f T h e S i T e m a y B e c o n - S T r u c T e d o f G r e a T e r p e r c e n T a G e S o f c l a S S ii o r c l a S S iii m a T e r i a l S if T h e S T r u c T u r e o T h e r W i S e c o n f o r m S T o a l l c i T y o r d i n a n c e S . Th e m i x T u r e o f B u i l d i n G m a T e r i a l S m u S T B e c o m p a T i B l e a n d i n T e G r a T e d . fi e L d Br i c k co L o r S ac c e n t Br i c k co L o r S ca S t St o n e co L o r S Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit DevelopmentPage 45 1060.002.02 I 09 january 2008desIgn guIdelInes 31100  31101 31110 31120 31130 31140  31102 31111 31121 31131 31141  31103 31112 31122 31132 31142  31104 31113 31123 31133 31143  31105 31114 31134  31106 31115 31135  Page 1 of 2Sto 800 Color System 12/13/2007http://www2.stocorp.com/STA/templates/sto800_sections.xml?low=31099&high=31345&contenttype=te... 31400  31401 31410 31420 31424 31437  31402 31411 31421 31430 31440  31403 31412 31422 31431 31441  31404 31413 31423 31432 31442  31405 31414 31433  31406 31415 31434  Page 1 of 2Sto 800 Color System 12/13/2007http://www2.stocorp.com/STA/templates/sto800_sections.xml?low=31399&high=31444&contenttype=te... 31300  31301 31310 31320 31324 31337  31302 31311 31321 31330 31340  31303 31312 31322 31331 31341  31304 31313 31323 31332 31342  31305 31314 31333  31306 31315 31334  Page 1 of 2Sto 800 Color System 12/12/2007http://www2.stocorp.com/STA/templates/sto800_sections.xml?low=31299&high=31444&contenttype=te... Pr i M a r y eifS/ St u c c o co L o r S Pr e f i n i S h e d Me t a L S co L o r Pa L e t t e ac c e n t eifS/ St u c c o co L o r S ex T e r i o r ma T e r i a l S : 1. Th e m a T e r i a l S S h o W n a r e r e p r e S e n T a - T i V e o f T h e f a m i l y o f c o l o r S p r e f e r r e d T o T h e d e S i G n o f T h e p r o j e c T . ho W e V e r , a d - d i T i o n a l m a T e r i a l S a n d c o l o r S n o T S h o W n h e r e m a y B e p r o p o S e d B y T h e T e n a n T . al l T e n a n T d e S i G n S a r e S u B j e c T T o a p p r o V a l B y l a n d l o r d & l a n d l o r d ’S a r c h i T e c T . pr i m a r y eifS/ ST u c c o c o l o r S S h o u l d B e o f W a r m , n e u T r a l T o n e S i n c l u d i n G c r e a m , T a n , a n d B r o W n . ac c e n T c o l o r S , i n c l u d - i n G c a n o p i e S a n d S i G n a G e , c a n B e m o r e V i B r a n T T o n e S o f r e d , G r e e n , B l u e , a n d y e l l o W . ac c e n T T o n e S W i l l B e n o m o r e T h a n 10% o f T h e T o T a l eifS/ ST u c c o u S e d . 2. Te n a n T S W i l l n o T B e a l l o W e d T o e x - T e n d T h e i r S T o r e f r o n T G l a S S a l l T h e W a y T o T h e l e a S e l i n e (in p l a n ). ea c h T e n - a n T i S r e q u i r e d T o c r e a T e a S T o r e f r o n T T e r m i n i S W h i c h W i l l B e p a r T o f T h e T e n - a n T S B u i l d i n G d e S i G n , B e c o n S T r u c T e d o f a c l a S S i m a T e r i a l o T h e r T h a n G l a S S , a n d W i l l T e r m i n a T e a T T h e T e n a n T S l e a S e l i n e . Wh e n T h e T e n a n T c h o o S e S T o B u m p o u T T h e i r f a c a d e , T h e y W i l l B e r e q u i r e d T o e x - T e n d T h i S T e r m i n i S B a c k T o T h e l a n d l o r d c o n S T r u c T e d f a c a d e . 3. aG a i n , T e n a n T S W i l l B e h i G h l y e n c o u r - a G e d T o V a r y T h e i r m a T e r i a l S e l e c T i o n S a n d d e S i G n f r o m T h e i r n e i G h B o r , W h i c h W i l l r e i n f o r c e T h e c o n c e p T o f u r B a n e d G e a n d c r e a T e a l i V e ly S T r e e T S c a p e a n d e x p e r i e n c e . Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit DevelopmentPage 46 1060.002.02 I 09 january 2008desIgn guIdelInes Ty p i c a l Se c T i o n S : 1. Te n a n T S W i l l B e e n c o u r a G e d T o V a r y T h e i r f a ç a d e h e i G h T S , a n d T h i c k n e S S e S T o p r o V i d e a u n i q u e a n d i n T e r e S T i n G o V e r a l l d e S i G n . ST o r e - f r o n T o p e n i n G S W i l l B e p r o V i d e d T o a h e i G h T o f 12’-0” a B o V e T h e f i n i S h e d f l o o r e l e V a T i o n . a V a r i e T y o f c a n o p y d e S i G n S , p r o f i l e S , a n d d i m e n - S i o n S a r e a l S o e n c o u r a G e d . ar e a S o f G l a z e d T r a n S o m S a B o V e c a n o p y / f e a T u r e e l e m e n T S a r e a l S o e n c o u r a G e d . To a l l o W f o r m a x i m u m f l e x i B i l i T y f o r T h e T e n a n T f a ç a d e d e S i G n , e a c h T e n a n T W i l l h a V e T h e a B i l i T y T o V a r y T h e p l a n e o f T h e i r f a ç a d e B y 8”, a n d T h e r e f o r e a l l T e n - a n T S W i l l c o m p l e T e T h e S i d e W a l k i n S T a l l a T i o n T o a p o i n T 5’-6” a W a y f r o m T h e S T o r e f r o n T a S i n d i c a T e d . 2. Te n a n T S T o r e f r o n T S a n d d e S i G n f e a T u r e S S h o W n a r e r e p r e S e n T a T i V e o f T h e d e S i r e d o V e r - a l l c h a r a c T e r f o r T h e d e V e l o p m e n T a n d a r e n o T S p e c i f i c a l l y B a S e d u p o n a c T u a l T e n a n T f a ç a d e d e S i G n S . iT i S T h e i n T e n T o f T h e d e V e l o p - m e n T T o a l l o W f o r T h e c r e a T i V e i m p l e m e n T a T i o n o f S p e c i f i c T e n a n T n a T i o n a l o r r e G i o n a l d e S i G n p a r a m e T e r S a n d i c o n i c i m a G e r y i n T o T h e o V e r a l l f a ç a d e o f T h e c e n T e r . Si g n a g e / ca n o P y de S i g n Se c t i o n @ of f i c e 3/16” = 1’-0” Se c t i o n @ re t a i L 3/16” = 1’-0” of f i c e SP a c e re t a i L SP a c e re t a i L SP a c e Po t e n t i a L te n a n t ca n o P y Po t e n t i a L te n a n t ca n o P y aL L o W a B L e te n a n t Pa r a P e t he i g h t aL L o W a B L e te n a n t St o r e f r o n t /fa c a d e Bu M P o u t z o n e aL L o W a B L e te n a n t St o r e f r o n t /fa c a d e Bu M P o u t z o n e co n c r e t e in f i L L zo n e co n c r e t e in f i L L zo n e La n d L o r d c o n S t r u c t e d f a c a d e La n d L o r d c o n S t r u c t e d f a c a d e Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit DevelopmentPage 47 Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development Page 48 Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development Page 49 REDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT- EXHIBIT 'DORA' PLAN- RETAILST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA/GOLDEN VALLEY, MINNESOTA17507THE SHOPS AT WEST ENDApr 23, 2008 - 4:52pm - User:dtbade F:\Construction\Development Services\LAND DEVELOPMENT - By City\St Lo32Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit DevelopmentPage 49a Park Place Boulevard and Duke Site Development StreetscapeCity of St. Louis Park March 19, 2008DraftPark Place BoulevardGamble DriveWayzata Boulevard16th StreetStreetscape Layout Plan 0 60 120 180ServiceServiceArcadeWest End BoulevardParkdalesOffi ceCampusDuke Retail DevelopmentDuke Retail DevelopmentAssociatedBankMetro TransitPark and RideInterstate 394 DoubletreeHotelExisting CommercialFuture DukeOffi ce DevelopmentExisting BuildingUtica Avenue(Design by Others)See Enlarged PlanSee Enlarged Plan Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development Page 50 Park Place Boulevard and Duke Site Development StreetscapeCity of St. Louis Park March 19, 2008Draft 0 5 10 15Park Place Boulevard and Gamble Drive Northwest Corner - Enlarged Streetscape PlanPark Place Boulevard (Northbound)Gamble DriveDESIGN ELEMENTSPaved Median NoseLandscape MedianBollardBanner PolePlanter Seat WallTrash ReceptaclePlanter UrnBench Intersection Lighting on Traffi c SignalOrnamental LightpolePaver SidewalkConcrete SidewalkConcrete Paving Bandat Building FacadeInformation Kiosk Duke Retail Building 2412345678910111213141234567891011121413Paver ColorsMeeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development Page 51 Park Place Boulevard and Duke Site Development StreetscapeCity of St. Louis Park March 19, 2008Draft DESIGN ELEMENTSPlanter Seat WallPlanter CurbPlanter UrnBench Ornamental LightpolePaver SidewalkLow Shrubs and PerennialsCanopy Tree123456780 2.5 5 7.5Park Place Boulevard Sidewalk at Arcade Entry - Enlarged Streetscape PlanPark Place Boulevard (Northbound)Duke RetailBuilding 23Duke RetailBuilding 23Arcade12345687Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development Page 52 Park Place Boulevard and Duke Site Development StreetscapeCity of St. Louis Park March 19, 2008Draft DESIGN ELEMENTSPlanter Seat WallTrash ReceptaclePlanter UrnBench Intersection Lighting on Traffi c SignalOrnamental LightpolePaver SidewalkBituminous TrailInformation KioskLow Shrubs and PerennialsOrnamental FencingGrass Boulevard Canopy Tree12345678910111213Park Place Boulevard and 16th Street Southwest Corner - Enlarged Streetscape PlanPark Place Boulevard (Southbound)16th Street (Eastbound)ExistingCommercial12356789101213Walk Connection to Existing Commercial411100 2.5 5 7.5 Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development Page 53 Park Place Boulevard and Duke Site Development StreetscapeCity of St. Louis Park March 19, 2008DraftStreetscape Cross Sections Park Place Boulevard Cross Section - Between Gamble Drive and 16th Street - Looking NorthPark Place Boulevard Cross Section - Between 16th Street and Wayzata Boulevard - Looking North0 5 10 15Doubletree ParkingBlvdRoad LandscapedMedianRoad Blvd Walk Duke Bldg 11Existing CommercialTrail BlvdRoadLandscapedMedianRoadPavedGroundPlanterWalkDuke Bldg 23TrailLandscapeScreeningMeeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development Page 54 Park Place Boulevard and Duke Site Development StreetscapeCity of St. Louis Park March 19, 2008DraftStreetscape Cross Sections 16th Street Cross Section - Between West End Boulevard and Parking Access Drive - Looking East16th Street Cross Section - Between Park Place Boulevard and West End Boulevard - Looking East0 5 10 15BlvdRoadPavedMedianDuke Bldg 22WalkDuke Bldg 11RoadWalk with Restaurant SeatingBlvdRoadLandscaped MedianDuke Bldg 31WalkDuke Bldg 12RoadWalk with Restaurant SeatingMeeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development Page 55 Park Place Boulevard and Duke Site Development StreetscapeCity of St. Louis Park March 19, 2008DraftGamble Drive Cross Section - Between Park Place Boulevard and West End Boulevard - Looking EastStreetscape Cross Sections 0 5 10 15BlvdRoadPaved MedianAssociated BankParking LotWalkDuke Bldg 24RoadWalkWayzata Boulevard Cross Section - Between Park Place Boulevard and Utica Avenue - Looking EastBlvdMetro TransitPark and RideRoad Paved MedianWalkRoad Walk ParkdalesParking LotBlvdMeeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development Page 56 Park Place Boulevard and Duke Site Development StreetscapeCity of St. Louis Park March 19, 2008DraftDESIGN ELEMENTSPARK PLACE BOULEVARDOPTION A OPTION BSIDEWALK PAVEMENTLIGHTING ANDBANNERSBENCH, TRASH RECEPTACLE,BIKE RACKBOLLARDTREE GRATEPLANTER SEAT WALL,PLANTER URNINFORMATION KIOSKSCREEN FENCINGMEDIAN TREATMENTCast in place concrete with precast cap and planter urn16TH STREETOPTION A OPTION BLandscapeformRosa42” diameterPolyetheleneCast in place concrete planterseatwallCustom Precast Concreteor Moulded PlasticStreetscape Elements MatrixCustom Precast Concreteor Moulded PlasticCustom Precast Concreteor Moulded PlasticCustom Precast Concreteor Moulded PlasticLandscapeforms - Towne Square Bench, Scarborough Trashers Dero - Hoop RackUrban Accessories Chinook 5ft. Square Cast IronNeenah Foundry Avenue Collection R-8712 5ft. Square Cast IronVictor Stanley - Framers Modern Bench, A-36, NSDC-36 Trashers Dero - Hoop RackLandscapeforms - Towne Square Bench, Scarborough Trashers Dero - Hoop RackNot ApplicableWausau TileSL403648” diameterPrecast ConcreteCustom metal sign with concrete baseMaster HalcoMonumental Iron Works - steelCustom fence - steelLumecContemporay Lantern SeriesL80 with fl uted poleBanners includedNo options proposedLumecRenaissance SeriesRN2D with fl uted pole Banners includedNo options proposedVictor Stanley - Framers Modern Bench, A-36, NSDC-36 Trashers Dero - HoopRackCustom metal signwith concrete baseCustom metal sign with concrete baseMaster HalcoMonumental Iron Works - steelCustom metal sign with concrete baseCustom fence - steelMix of colored concrete unit pavers and gray concrete No options proposedandNot ApplicablePaver maintenance strip, planter curb, plants and trees,bollards and banner poles in select locationsNo options proposedWide Median - Paver maintenance strip, planter curb, plants and treesNarrow Median - Pavers across full width, bollards and banner poles in select locationsNo options proposedandMix of colored concrete unit pavers and gray concreteNo options proposedMeeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development Page 57 Park Place Boulevard and Duke Site Development StreetscapeCity of St. Louis Park March 19, 2008DraftSIDEWALK PAVEMENTBENCH, TRASH RECEPTACLE,BIKE RACKBOLLARDTREE GRATEPLANTER SEAT WALL,PLANTER URNINFORMATION KIOSKSCREEN FENCINGMEDIAN TREATMENTDESIGN ELEMENTSGAMBLE DRIVEOPTION A OPTION BWAYZATA BOULEVARDOPTION A OPTION BStreetscape Elements MatrixLandscapeforms Scarborough Trash Receptacles LIGHTING ANDBANNERSLandscapeforms Scarborough Trash Receptacles Master HalcoMonumental Iron Works - steelCustom fence - steelCustom Precast Concreteor Moulded PlasticCustom Precast Concreteor Moulded PlasticVictor Stanley A-36, NSDC-36 Trash Receptacles Custom metal sign with concrete baseCustom metal sign with concrete baseNot ApplicableNot ApplicableNot ApplicableNot ApplicableNot ApplicableNot ApplicableNot ApplicableNot ApplicableNot ApplicableNot ApplicableNot ApplicableNot ApplicableNot ApplicableNot ApplicableVictor Stanley A-36, NSDC-36 Trash Receptacles Pavers across full width median, bollards and banner poles in select locationsNo options proposedScored, gray concrete No options proposedScored, gray concrete No options proposedLumecContemporay Lantern SeriesL80 with fl uted poleBanners includedNo options proposedLumecRenaissance SeriesRN2D with fl uted pole Banners includedNo options proposedWide Median - Paver maintenance strip, planter curb, plants and treesNarrow Median - Pavers across full width, bollards and banner poles in select locationsNo options proposedMeeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development Page 58 1060.002.00 I 08 JANUARY 2008SHADOW STUDYSPRING 3.213:00 P.M.9:00 A.M.3:00 P.M.9:00 A.M.3:00 P.M.9:00 A.M.3:00 P.M.9:00 A.M.SUMMER 6.21FALL 9.21WINTER 12.21Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8b) Subject: West End Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development Page 59 Meeting Date: April 28, 2008 Agenda Item #: 8c Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance Presentation Other: EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other: Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other: TITLE: 2008-2010 Law Enforcement Labor Services (LELS) Local #220 – Public Safety Dispatchers Labor Agreement. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to adopt the attached Resolution approving a Labor Agreement between the City and the Public Safety Dispatchers LELS Local #220, establishing terms and conditions of employment for three years, from 1/1/08 – 12/31/10. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does Council wish to approve the Labor Agreement between the City and the Dispatchers Union? BACKGROUND: Staff is pleased to bring to Council the details of this contract agreement between the City and Union for 2008. This is the last open contract for 2008. As you are aware, we have 11 staff that provide quality dispatch services for all of our public safety activities (Police and Fire) for the cities of St. Louis Park and Golden Valley. These operations are housed and managed in our Police Department. Upon adoption of this contract, three of our five groups will be settled through 2010 (Dispatch, Firefighters and Maintenance). Our other two contracts (Sergeants and Officers) are settled through 2009. The City and the Union have had productive negotiation sessions and have come to agreement. The following is a summary of changes to the contract: • Duration of three years (1/1/08 – 12/31/10). • Wage increase of 3% effective January 1, 2008 (consistent with non-union). • Market adjustment of 50 cents per hour on top of the 3% increase for 2008. o Comment: Review of market data shows our Dispatchers were starting to fall below market average. The total cost of the market adjustment is approximately $11,500 for 2008. • Wage increase of 3% for 2009 (consistent with other union groups). • Market adjustment of 10 cents per hour on top of the 3% increase for 2009. o Comment: Market data indicates that another adjustment is necessary to keep our Dispatchers in line with comparable cities. Cost of this adjustment is approximately $2,300 for 2009. • Wage increase of 3.25% for 2010 (consistent with other union groups). Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8c) Page 2 Subject: 2008-2010 IUOE Local 49 Labor Agreement • Employer contribution for health insurance consistent with other groups for 2008 at $720 per month. If electing the high deductible health plan, the employer contribution is set at $511.66 for premiums and $208.34 for VEBA contribution. • Employer contribution for health insurance for 2009 and 2010 set as same amount as other non-union groups. • The minimum hours for employees who appear at court increased from two to three hours. These hours are paid at one and one-half times the employee’s base pay rate. o Comment: This is consistent with other contracts. • Health Care Savings Plan/VEBA - Two new contract additions: 1. The first is the severance transfer plan that non-union and other union groups have already voted to approve. (This is the only group that had not adopted the plan previously.) This is a mandatory plan for employees who qualify to receive severance pay upon separation from the city to participate in the HCSP based on the level of flex leave balance. Based on plan design, flex leave would move to a HCSP upon separation from employment. 2. The other plan is the annual transfer of up to 40 hours of leave for those employees who are at their max of leave accrual (Sergeants and Local 49 also have approved this language). Prior to this, employees who reach the maximum on leave accrual were issued up to 40 hours paid one time per year in accordance with policy. o Comment: The changes do not increase the cost to the city. The benefit of moving to these plans is that they allow employees to continue to build tax- free balances in their VEBA accounts to help pay for eligible medical expenses, including retirement health insurance premiums. Ability to do this must be approved by bargaining group and comply with the IRS rules and regulations surrounding such plans. Staff is pleased with this agreement and recommends approval. The proposed contract is on file with the City Clerk. More detail is available upon request. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Funds for this settlement are in the 2008 budget, and will be included in the 2009 and 2010 budget preparation. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. Attachments: Resolution Prepared by: Ali Fosse, HR Coordinator Reviewed by: Nancy Gohman, Deputy City Manager/HR Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8c) Page 3 Subject: 2008-2010 IUOE Local 49 Labor Agreement RESOLUTION NO. 08-______ RESOLUTION APPROVING THE LABOR AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK AND PUBLIC SAFETY DISPATCHERS, LELS LOCAL #220 JANUARY 1, 2008 – DECEMBER 31, 2010 WHEREAS, the City and the Union have reached a negotiated settlement covering the terms and conditions of a Labor Agreement as permitted by the State of Minnesota Public Employees Labor Relations Act, and WHEREAS, the City Council may enter into such agreements as authorized by its Charter; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park that the Mayor and City Manager are authorized to execute a Collective Bargaining Agreement, City Contract #______, between the City of St. Louis Park and Public Safety Dispatchers, LELS Local #220, effective January 1, 2008 – December 31, 2010. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council April 28, 2008 City Manager Mayor Attest: City Clerk Meeting Date: April 28, 2008 Agenda Item #: 8d Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance Presentation Other: EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other: Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other: TITLE: Advertising & Sponsorship Guidelines. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to approve adoption of the attached Advertising & Sponsorship Guidelines. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Do the attached advertising guidelines reflect the mission, values and vision of the City of St. Louis Park and its place as a Children First community? BACKGROUND: In July 2007, city staff discussed with the council the absence of a city publication advertising policy. Partnering with advertisers or sponsors is a practice already in place in the city related to publications, Web, media, events and facility advertisements. Currently, the city enters into revenue- sharing agreements to sell or place ads with a variety of contractors. This practice has been done on occasion over the years and we do not have a policy. The city recently adopted a policy for athletic field advertising. Staff is recommending that a general policy for advertising and sponsorships be developed to give staff guidelines to cover publications, other written media, cable television, videos and the website. The purpose of an advertising and sponsorship policy is to allow the city the opportunity to set standards in its advertising and make sure our advertising also meets with the vision, mission and values in our organization along with asset building for children in our Children First initiatives. A policy for advertising in city facilities is not recommended to be included at this time. This is controlled in Parks and Recreation and the system used appears to be working. If facility advertising is to be included, staff recommends that the Parks and Recreation Director develop recommendations. Staff met with Council in a study session April 7, 2008, to discuss the direction of the attached policy. Staff, with assistance from the city attorney, has reworded the section pertaining to alcohol sales to reflect that restaurants that sell alcohol are a permitted advertiser or sponsor, as long as the advertisements and or sponsorship do not promote alcohol consumption. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: By selling ads or sponsorships, the city or its partners are able to offset the cost of production, publishing and mailing. Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8d) Page 2 Subject: Advertising & Sponsorship Guidelines VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged community. Reaching out to the public with timely, accurate information enables us to do keep them connected and engaged. Attachments: City Advertising & Sponsorship Guidelines Prepared by: Jamie Zwilling, Communications Coordinator Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8d) Page 3 Subject: Advertising & Sponsorship Guidelines City Advertising & Sponsorship Guidelines Purpose The purpose of this policy is to provide guidelines for allowing advertising or sponsorships in city publications and other forms of media. Application of Advertising and Sponsorship Guidelines The City of St. Louis Park will consider allowing paid advertising and sponsorship guidelines to offset the production costs related to certain publications and media productions. Advertising and sponsorship policies are administered by the City Manager or designee. Examples of publications and media productions include but are not limited to: City/School Calendar, Community Guide, New Resident Packet, Maps, Parks and Recreation information, cable & video productions and the city’s website. This guideline does not apply to city facilities or neighborhood newsletters. Advertising for field signage is included in the zoning ordinance. Advertising & Sponsorship Standards All advertisements and sponsors are subject to the City Manager’s approval. Advertising or sponsors will be in line with the Vision, Mission and Values of the City. Standards should be in line with our designation as a Children First community. No advertising will be permitted which: • Is false, misleading, libelous, or deceptive; • Relates to an illegal activity; • Contains obscene material as determined by community standards; • Advertises the sale of alcoholic beverages,, tobacco products or sexually oriented businesses, Exception: Restaurants that sell alcoholic beverages may be permitted advertisers so long as no special promotion of alcoholic beverages is included • Includes language which is obscene, vulgar or profane; • Implies an endorsement by the City for the product or service; and • Promotes a commercial transaction that is prohibited by federal, state or local law or regulations Requirements Staff will develop specific display requirements for each type of advertising depending on the format of the media. The City assumes no liability for errors in advertisements submitted. Positioning of advertisements is at the discretion of the City except where a request for a specific position is accepted as part of the advertising sale, as determined by the City Manager. Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8d) Page 4 Subject: Advertising & Sponsorship Guidelines Third-party sales and Joint publications • In the event that the city contracts with a third party to sell advertisements for any city publication or media, those advertisements are subject to this policy. • In the event that the city produces a publication or other media jointly with another organization, all advertisements and sponsorships are subject to this policy and any additional standards imposed by the other organization’s policy. • The City will allow trade-outs for advertising with other community organizations meeting the above advertising standards with the City Manager’s or his/her designates’ approval. Administration The City Manager may establish administrative standards, policies and rules in addition to those stated above appropriate to this guideline. The City Manager may direct staff to develop and provide the necessary forms, procedures and instruction for the implementation of this program. The City Manager has the authority to interpret, develop, change and delete sections within this program. Exceptions to this policy must be made only at the discretion of the City Manager. The City of St. Louis Park reserves the right to decline or cancel any submitted advertisement or discontinue posting of any advertisement previously accepted that is not in the best interest of the City of St. Louis Park and its constituents. Meeting Date: April 28, 2008 Agenda Item #: 8e Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance Presentation Other: EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other: Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other: TITLE: Waiver of Cable Franchising Standstill Agreement for Aquila Commons. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to approve Resolution authorizing a Waiver to the Standstill Agreement regarding Cable Television Franchise Compliance with Comcast at Aquila Commons. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the Council wish to approve the attached resolution which would clear the way for Comcast and residents of Aquila Commons to pursue a business agreement that will provide for additional security features to be added at Aquila Commons (closed circuit security cameras)? BACKGROUND: The city’s cable television franchise with Comcast includes, as required by state law, a requirement that Comcast provide all subscribers within the city a regional channel (MCN 6). In 2003, the city met with Comcast’s predecessor, Time Warner, to mediate a dispute related to the use of a closed-circuit security camera signal in multiple family dwelling units that replaced the MCN6 signal. The result of the mediation was a standstill agreement with respect to the continued and future use of the cable television system to provide security camera service to residents of multiple family dwelling units. Aquila Commons The owners of Aquila Commons has requested Comcast provide cable television services for security camera purposes. Through the use of improved technology, Comcast can now provide the requested service without interfering or disrupting the continued delivery of the regional channel to residents as required by state law. Given the Standstill Agreement, Aquila Commons has asked that the City take action to allow them to work with Comcast to enhance security at the complex. In working with our City Attorney, it was recommended that a formal resolution be adopted to handle this matter. Therefore, staff is recommending that the city offer a waiver of the standstill agreement to Comcast, regarding Aquila Commons, with the following condition: • Comcast must deliver to all residents at Aquila Commons who subscribe to cable television services all channels required by Federal law, State of Minnesota statute, and local ordinance (specifically, all local broadcast television channels; PEG access channels and the MCN6 Regional channel) at the channel assignments indicated by its current city-wide channel line- up card. Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8e) Page 2 Subject: Cable Franchising Standstill Agreement Waiver for Aquila Commons Comcast will then be able to deliver any entryway security camera signals, provided by Aquila Commons, over their signal cables to residents. This waiver would not bind Comcast to offer the security camera, but it removes any barriers from the city for it to do so. Any business agreement regarding the service will be solely between Comcast and Aquila Commons. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: None. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. Attachments: Resolution Prepared by: Jamie Zwilling, Communications Coordinator Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8e) Page 3 Subject: Cable Franchising Standstill Agreement Waiver for Aquila Commons RESOLUTION NO.08-_____ RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A WAIVER TO THE STANDSTILL AGREEMENT REGARDING CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE COMPLIANCE WITH COMCAST WHEREAS, the City has a cable television franchise ("Franchise") with Comcast, and; WHEREAS, that franchise includes, as required by Minnesota Statutes §238.43, a requirement that Comcast provide all subscribers within the City with a regional channel (MCN 6), and; WHEREAS, some multiple dwelling units within the City, with the assistance or knowledge of Comcast’s predecessor franchisee took steps to replace the MCN6 signal with a closed circuit security camera signal in order to promote the safety of the residents and guests of the multiple dwelling units, and; WHEREAS, the City made an initial determination that this practice may violate state law and the franchise agreement, and; WHEREAS, Comcast’s predecessor made an initial determination that the statute and franchise was not violated, and; WHEREAS, City and Comcast’s predecessor met to mediate the dispute in order to best effectuate state law, the terms of the franchise, and the delivery of quality services to subscribers consistent with the expectations and wishes of the residents, and entered into a standstill agreement on October 7, 2003 with respect to the continued and future use of the cable television system to provide security camera service to residents of multiple dwelling units, and; WHEREAS, that standstill agreement specified that the cable television franchisee would not install nor activate security camera channel services on other multiple dwelling units, and; WHEREAS, Comcast has been requested by the owners of Aquila Commons to employ the cable television services for security camera purposes, and; WHEREAS, Comcast can provide the requested service without interfering or disrupting the continued delivery of the regional channel to residents as required by state law. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota that the City hereby waives the application of the Standstill Agreement between the City and Comcast regarding Aquila Commons, 8200 West 33rd Street, subject to the following terms and conditions: Meeting of April 28, 2008 (Item No. 8e) Page 4 Subject: Cable Franchising Standstill Agreement Waiver for Aquila Commons 1. Comcast shall deliver to all residents at Aquila Commons who subscribe to cable television services all channels required by Federal law, State of Minnesota statute, and local ordinance, specifically, all local broadcast television channels; PEG access channels and the MCN6 Regional channel at the channel assignments indicated by its current city-wide channel line-up card. 2. Comcast shall be able to deliver any entryway security camera signals, provided by Aquila Commons, over their signal cables, to residents. 3. Any business agreement to do so shall be solely between Comcast and Aquila Commons. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council April 28, 2008 City Manager Mayor Attest: City Clerk