HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009/01/05 - ADMIN - Agenda Packets - City Council - RegularAGENDA
JANUARY 5, 2009
6:30 p.m. BOARD AND COMMISSION INTERVIEW – Westwood Room
6:45 p.m. SPECIAL STUDY SESSION – Westwood Room
Discussion Items
1. 6:45 p.m. Review City Council Workshop Agenda
Written Reports
2. November 2008 Monthly Financial Reports
3. Conditional Use Permits in the Zoning Ordinance
7:20 p.m. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Council Chambers
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Approval of Minutes
3a. Economic Development Authority Minutes December 15, 2008
4. Approval of Agenda
5. Reports
5a. EDA Vendor Claims
6. Old Business
7. New Business
7a. 2009 Economic Development Authority Officers
Recommended Action:
Motion to elect President, Vice-President, and Treasurer to the Economic
Development Authority for the 2009 term.
8. Communications
9. Adjournment
7:30 p.m. CITY COUNCIL MEETING – Council Chambers
1. Call to Order
1a. Pledge of Allegiance
1b. Roll Call
2. Presentations
2a. Cisco Systems Donation to City Telephone System
Meeting of January 5, 2009
City Council Agenda
3. Approval of Minutes
3a. City Council Study Session Minutes November 24, 2008
3b. City Council Special Study Session Minutes December 1, 2008
3c. City Council Minutes December 1, 2008
3d. Joint City Council / School Board Minutes December 8, 2008
3e. Closed Executive Session December 8, 2008
3f. City Council Study Session Minutes December 8, 2008
3g. City Council Special Study Session Minutes December 15, 2008
3h. City Council Minutes December 15, 2008
4. Approval of Agenda and Items on Consent Calendar
NOTE: The Consent Calendar lists those items of business which are considered to be routine and/or which need no
discussion. Consent items are acted upon by one motion. If discussion is desired by either a Councilmember or a
member of the audience, that item may be moved to an appropriate section of the regular agenda for discussion. The
items for the Consent Calendar are listed on the last page of the Agenda.
Recommended Action:
Motion to approve the agenda as presented and to approve items on the consent calendar.
(Alternatively: Motion to add or remove items from the agenda, motion to move items from consent
calendar to regular agenda for discussion and to approve those items remaining on the consent
calendar.)
5. Boards and Commissions -- None
6. Public Hearings -- None
7. Requests, Petitions, and Communications from the Public
8. Resolutions, Ordinances, Motions and Discussion Items
8a. 2009 Mayor Pro-Tem
Recommended Action:
Motion to Adopt Resolution appointing a Mayor Pro-Tem for 2009.
8b. Mulberry’s Dry Cleaning - Conditional Use Permit and Variance.
Recommended Action:
Motion to Adopt Resolutions approving a Conditional Use Permit to allow the In-
Vehicle Service and a 65 foot variance to allow a 35 foot setback from residential
property for Mulberry’s Dry Cleaning.
8c. Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendments relating to communication
towers and antennas.
Recommended Action:
Motion to approve second reading and adopt the ordinance amending the Zoning
Ordinance relating to communication towers and antennas, and approve the
summary ordinance and authorize publication.
9. Communication
Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. To make arrangements, please call the
Administration Department at 952/924-2525 (TDD 952/924-2518) at least 96 hours in advance of meeting.
Meeting of January 5, 2009
City Council Agenda
4. CONSENT CALENDAR
4a. Motion to Adopt Resolution Declaring 2009 City Council Meeting Dates.
4b. Motion to Approve Resolution designating the St. Louis Park Sun Sailor as the City’s
Official Newspaper for year 2009.
4c. Motion to Adopt Resolution Authorizing Award of the 2009 St. Louis Park Arts and Culture
Grants.
4d. Motion to Approve Second Reading of Ordinance vacating easements for the Ellipse on
Excelsior redevelopment, approve summary ordinance and authorize publication.
4e. Motion to waive second reading and adopt the ordinance amending the Zoning Ordinance
relating to Service land use in the Office (O) zoning district, and approve the summary
ordinance contained in the agenda materials for publication.
4f. Motion to Adopt a Resolution Accepting a Donation from Cisco Systems, Inc. in the form
of eighty IP telephones and one gateway.
4g. Motion to adopt Resolution authorizing final payment in the amount of $40,363.72 for the
Minnetonka Boulevard Trail Improvement Project - Project No. 2004-0302 with DMJ
Corporation, Contract No. 105-07.
4h. Accept for Filing Planning Commission Minutes December 3 2008
4i. Approve for Filing Vendor Claims
4j. Final Payment Resolution - Contract 59-08 – Valley Paving, Inc. – Project No. 2007-1100.
St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority and regular City Council meetings are carried live on Civic TV cable
channel 17 and replays are frequent; check www.parktv.org for the schedule. The meetings are also streamed live on the
internet at www.parktv.org, and saved for Video on Demand replays. The agenda is posted on Fridays on the official
city bulletin board in the lobby of City Hall and on the text display on Civic TV cable channel 17. The agenda and full
packet are available by noon on Friday on the city’s website.
Meeting Date: January 5, 2009
Agenda Item #: 2a
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Cisco Systems Donation to City Telephone System.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Timothy Graca, Account Manager for Cisco Systems will be in attendance to inform the City
Council of Cisco’s donation of 80 telephones and one gateway to the City of St. Louis Park in
appreciation for the City’s involvement with the Republican National Convention in September.
The donation will be formally accepted by the City Council as a consent item following the
presentation.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
None.
BACKGROUND:
The attached letter from Cisco Systems explains the background of the donation. It is a very helpful
donation during tight budget times when the City of St. Louis Park remains committed to providing
high quality services, particularly to support communications for critical public safety activities.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
This donation has the effect of reducing the capital funds necessary to replace the City’s telephone
system by $20,900. The City Council approved capital funds of $303,629 for the telephone system
replacement in 2008.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
Attachments: Letter from Cisco Systems
Prepared by: Clint Pires, Chief Information Officer
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 2a) Page 2
Subject: Cisco Systems Donation to City Telephone System
December 21, 2008
Mr. Clint Pires
The City of St. Louis Park
5005 Minnetonka Blvd
St. Louis Park Minnesota 55416
Dear Clint,
Cisco Systems, Inc. is honored that the City of St. Louis Park has decided upon and approved
moving forward with the LOGIS proposal to join their IP Telephony Service.
As you are aware, LOGIS’s IP Telephony service is based upon the Cisco Unified Communications
platform, which is a state of the art, enterprise solution that leverages the advanced features needed
in an IP telephony system along with an array of applications and interoperability that will allow this
system to grow and support the needs of the city.
Cisco is proud of our partnership with LOGIS. Since 2007, LOGIS has leveraged Cisco’s Unified
Communications architecture for their members and provided to them a leading edge, feature rich,
highly reliable solution, that leverages LOGIS’s excellent customer service and cost savings.
In the spirit of this partnership with LOGIS and the City of St. Louis Park, and to thank the city for
their involvement in the Republican National Convention, Cisco Systems Inc. would like to provide
the following donation of equipment to the city:
• Eighty Cisco 7961 IP Telephony phones.
• One VG224 gateway.
This equipment was previously used for a month in Minneapolis to support and coordinate the
needs of the government during the Republican National Convention and we would be proud to
donate this equipment to the City of St. Louis Park. These will have the same warranty as the other
equipment we provide.
Please let us know when your implementation has begun and we will work with LOGIS to provide
this equipment for your organization.
Kindest regards,
Timothy Graca
Cisco Account Manager
Government & Education
7900 International Drive
Bloomington, MN. 55425-8912
Direct 952-967-8576
Mobile 612-799-7979
tgraca@cisco.com
Meeting Date: January 5, 2009
Agenda Item #: 3a
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
November 24, 2008
The meeting convened at 6:20 p.m.
Councilmembers present: Mayor Jeff Jacobs, John Basill, C. Paul Carver, Phil Finkelstein, Paul
Omodt, Loran Paprocki, and Sue Sanger.
Councilmembers absent: None.
Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), City Engineer (Mr. Brink), Chief Information Officer
(Mr. Pires), Director of Parks & Recreation(Ms. Walsh), Director of Public Works (Mr. Rardin),
Finance Director (Mr. DeJong) and Recording Secretary (Ms. Larrea).
Guest: None.
1. Future Study Session Agenda Planning – December 1 and December 8, 2008
Mr. Harmening presented the staff report. On December 1 the agenda includes a discussion on
Open Meeting Law, Commissioner Code of Ethics and Community Residential Facility Licensing.
Mr. Harmening noted that staff is trying to set up a meeting with the City Council and the School
Board. He questioned if the Council would be interested in meeting at 5:00 p.m. on December 8
prior to the study session. Councilmember Sanger asked what the meeting is regarding. Mr.
Harmening responded that one of the topics would be the budget. Councilmember Basill noted
that he is in favor of meeting with the School Board.
Councilmember Paprocki asked if there was an urgency to schedule a meeting with the School
Board. Councilmember Finkelstein noted that he would like to have an agenda in place before they
meet with the School Board. He also noted that he would not be able to make it to the meeting by
5:00 p.m. Councilmember Sanger would like an update from the School Board regarding the
possible closing of a school site.
It was the consensus of the Council to move forward with the meeting with the School Board with
the understanding the Mayor and City Manager would meet with the School Board Chair and
Superintendent to set the agenda.
2. TH 7 & Wooddale Avenue Design, Schedule, and Financing
Mr. Brink presented to the Council regarding the current status of project design, financing and
project schedule of TH 7 and Wooddale Avenue.
Councilmember Sanger questioned if it would be possible to have vegetation and a noise wall at this
location. Mr. Brink responded that staff is looking at both of those options.
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 3a) Page 2
Subject: City Council Study Session Minutes November 24, 2008
Councilmember Basill noted that regardless of whether they use vegetation or a noise wall, there will
be less of a noise issue because of the improvements that are being made.
Councilmember Sanger felt that the noise walls should be left in the plan at this point with the
option of being taken out later.
Mr. Brink noted that the noise walls are estimated to cost between a half million dollars to a million
dollars. He also confirmed that the changes being made will take care of some of the noise.
Mr. Brink noted that staff has been working with the school in the area. Staff would like to improve
the routes to the school.
Councilmember Sanger noted that there are concerns from the Sorenson neighborhood regarding
how they will be able to cross Wooddale to get to the school.
Mr. Brink clarified that the reason for not having traffic lights at this intersection is that the
intersection doesn’t meet any of the warrants by Mn/DOT.
Councilmember Basill noted that there is always the possibility of installing a stop light in the future.
Councilmember Paprocki noted that it would be nice to have a pedestrian school crossing.
Mr. Rardin noted that the design is set up so that things can be added at a later time.
Councilmember Finkelstein noted that this could be a light rail stop in a few years and agreed that it
may be more beneficial to reevaluate in the future rather than add things now.
Mayor Jacobs questioned if there was going to be enough room for a designated right turn lane. Mr.
Rardin confirmed that there would be. Councilmember Omodt noted that it would be possible to
put crossing guards out on the street to help kids crossing to the school. He agreed that it would be
easier to add things at a later date.
Councilmember Sanger noted that the issues with children getting to the school during the
construction should be discussed with the School Board when the Council meets with them.
Councilmember Sanger asked that they talk about the timing of the construction. Mr. Brink noted
that they would like to start in the spring. He noted that Excelsior Boulevard from Dakota to
Louisiana is scheduled to start in 2010. Staff is hoping that the projects will not overlap.
Councilmember Sanger questioned if Wooddale is going to be shut down for additional winter
months.
Councilmember Finkelstein noted that the federal funding is only good through a certain date and
the longer the City waits on this project the less federal funding the City will receive.
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 3a) Page 3
Subject: City Council Study Session Minutes November 24, 2008
Councilmember Sanger was concerned about the current economic situation and that some of the
funding is dependant on a TIF district. Mr. Harmening responded that he did not have an answer
to that question at this time.
Councilmember Carver suggested looking at other projects that are close to being “shovel ready” and
have them prepared to a point where the projects would be eligible for economic stimulus in the
upcoming year.
It was the consensus of the Council to further discuss this matter at a future meeting.
3. 2009 Budget and Levy, Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and Financial Management
Plan (FMP)
Mr. Harmening presented the staff report to the Council. Staff if requesting consensus to move
forward with presented amounts for Truth-in-Taxation (TNT) purposes. Based on the feedback
from the Council, staff will prepare the presentation for the TNT hearing on December 1.
Councilmember Basill stated that he was fine with the eliminating proactive sidewalk snow removal
inspections and enforcement. He would like to continue to publicize the ordinance.
Mr. Harmening questioned if Council members received any feedback regarding the Truth-in-
Taxation mailing that went out. There was not any significant response seen or heard by the
Council members.
Councilmember Sanger noted there was a proposal in the budget document for saving $2,000 by
turning off the flashing traffic light on Lake Street. This issue has been raised in the past and the
neighborhood has felt strongly that this stop light should not be removed. She noted that she would
not like to again discuss this item at length.
Mr. Rardin said that he is suggesting putting up a stop sign at this intersection. He felt that from an
environmental standpoint, this would save electricity. He noted that the City spends about $2,000
per year in electricity and this does not include maintenance.
Councilmember Finkelstein indicated he remembered the last time this was brought up to the
Council and the neighborhood was very passionate that they did not want a stop sign in the area.
Councilmember Carver noted that it is important to listen to the staff member’s opinions on these
issues.
Councilmember Sanger noted that she would like to embark on a process to get the citizens involved
in the process in general. She would like to see if the public has suggestions for how the City could
save money. She would also like Councilmembers to come up with ideas.
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 3a) Page 4
Subject: City Council Study Session Minutes November 24, 2008
Councilmember Paprocki noted that this was discussed at a prior study session when
Councilmember Sanger was absent. He has suggested that the directors of the departments create a
list of items that they feel could be cut from their budget so the Councilmembers can discuss the
items.
Councilmember Sanger asked for a response on her suggestion to go to the City for feedback on the
budget. Councilmember Finkelstein noted that he would like this issue included at the winter retreat
because he would like some more time to think it over. Mayor Jacobs agreed that this should be
discussed at length and that residents should be involved in the discussion. Councilmember Sanger
would like to get specific feedback from residents so the Council can get some more thoughtful
ideas.
Councilmember Omodt noted that staff could look to see if this has worked in other cities. He
would like more information before he makes a decision whether he would like to move forward.
He would like a model that they could look at more closely.
Councilmember Finkelstein questioned if the WiFi money would go back into the enterprise fund.
Mr. Harmening confirmed that it would.
Councilmember Carver liked the idea of finding out from the department heads if they had to cut 5
%, what would be cut, which could be discussed at the retreat. He is more hesitant to ask the
residents what should be cut because the department heads will know their budget better than
anyone else. He is not against the idea but is hesitant about it.
Mayor Jacobs noted that this is also a good opportunity to explain to the public why some programs
are necessary.
Councilmember Paprocki noted the City should be evaluating the budget every 4-5 years, not just
when it is necessary.
Mr. Harmening felt that bringing up the budget at the winter retreat would be perfect timing. He
would like to look more deeply at how the City does business and what could be done differently.
Mr. Harmening suggested that as a first step it may be more appropriate for the Council to prioritize
the services and programs the city provides and then ask staff to offer proposal on the allocation of
resources based on those priorities rather than looking at across the board cuts
Mr. DeJong presented to the Council regarding the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The draft
CIP shows a total of $108,941,237 in planned investment in the community’s assets over the next
five years.
Mr. Pires presented to the Council regarding ideas for technology related capital improvements
within the City.
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 3a) Page 5
Subject: City Council Study Session Minutes November 24, 2008
Councilmember Finkelstein questioned how much the City is spending on technology now versus 5
years ago. Mr. Pires was not able to answer the question at this time but noted there have been
rather large capital improvements in the last five years.
Councilmember Sanger questioned what the City is doing to review their records retention. Mr.
Pires responded that staff is working with a consultant in order to evaluate how best to measure
storage needs. It is going to take some time to analyze what staff is storing and how often these files
are being accessed. There is also the issue of the duplication of files.
Ms. Walsh presented to Council regarding capital improvements related to the Parks and Recreation
Department.
Councilmember Sanger questioned whether the new dog park should be designated as a small dog
park. She noted that this might help to spread out the use of dog parks. Ms. Walsh will be
completing some more public process on the dog parks and bring back more information at a future
meeting.
Councilmember Basill would like staff to look at putting mats in the restrooms at the Rec Center for
access while wearing ice skates. The old bathrooms are hard to access with skates and the new
bathrooms can not be accessed because of tiles.
Mr. Rardin presented to the Council regarding public works projects in the CIP. Mr. Rardin
questioned the Council regarding a whistle quiet zone. He wanted to know if they felt there was a
value to spend the money on this in 2009. Councilmember Sanger noted that she would like to wait
on the whistle quiet zone because of the LRT, which would only push it back two years. The other
Council members were in agreement.
Communications (Verbal)
Mr. Harmening noted there will be boy scouts at City Council meeting next week.
Mr. Harmening informed the Council that there will be a League of Minnesota meeting in February
2009. There is more information available if any Council members are interested in attending.
Mr. Harmening noted that Clear Channel has agreed to take down the billboards on the SPS
property by the end of 2008.
Mr. Harmening updated the Council that Pawn America responded to the letter sent to them by the
City.
Mr. Harmening noted that Tom Peterson has requested to be seen before the City Council to
express some concerns.
The meeting adjourned at 10:10 p.m.
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 3a) Page 6
Subject: City Council Study Session Minutes November 24, 2008
Written Reports provided and documented for recording purposes only:
4. October 2008 Monthly Financial Report
5. Update on Energy Analysis of City Facilities
6. Need for Public Utility Easement for Ellipse on Excelsior Project
______________________________________ ______________________________________
Nancy Stroth, City Clerk Jeff Jacobs, Mayor
Meeting Date: January 5, 2009
Agenda Item #: 3b
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL STUDY SESSION
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
DECEMBER 1, 2008
The meeting convened at 6:07 p.m.
Councilmembers present: Mayor Jeff Jacobs, John Basill, C. Paul Carver, Paul Omodt, Loran
Paprocki and Susan Sanger.
Councilmembers absent: Phil Finkelstein
Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), Director of Inspections (Mr. Hoffman), City
Attorney (Mr. Scott), Communications Coordinator (Mr. Zwilling) and Recording Secretary (Ms.
Schmidt).
1. Overview of Open Meeting Law
Mr. Scott provided Council with an overview of the Open Meeting Law, as well as penalties and
recent court opinions.
2. Community Residential Facility Licensing
Mr. Hoffman presented the staff report. Council and staff had discussion on the need for the
establishment of an ordinance, which would require community residential facilities to be licensed.
Council expressed a desire for staff to research more options.
The meeting adjourned at 7:29 p.m.
_____________________________________ ______________________________________
Nancy Stroth, City Clerk Jeff Jacobs, Mayor
Meeting Date: January 5, 2009
Agenda Item #: 3c
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
DECEMBER 1, 2008
1. Call to Order
Mayor Jacobs called the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m.
Councilmembers present: Mayor Jeff Jacobs, John Basill, C. Paul Carver, Paul Omodt, Loran
Paprocki and Susan Sanger.
Councilmembers absent: Phil Finkelstein
Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), City Attorney (Mr. Scott), Police Chief (Mr. Luse),
Police Lieutenant (Ms. Dreier), Fire Chief (Mr. Stemmer), Finance Director (Mr. DeJong),
Assistant Finance Director (Mr. Swanson), Communications Coordinator (Mr. Zwilling), City
Assessor (Mr. Bultema), Community Development Director (Mr. Locke), Planning & Zoning
Supervisor (Ms. McMonigal) Senior Planner (Mr. Walther), Director of Inspections (Mr. Hoffman)
and Recording Secretary (Ms. Schmidt).
Guests: Todd Miller, IACP Chair.
Boy Scout Troop 282 led the Pledge of Allegiance.
2. Presentations
2a. 2008 IACP Community Policing Award
Chief Luse introduced Todd Miller, Chair of the IACP (International Association of Chiefs
of Police) Community Policing Committee. Mr. Miller explained the program and
expressed appreciation for the hard work the Police Department, City departments,
businesses and residential communities have done implementing and addressing the
proliferation of graffiti in the community and presented Mayor Jacobs with the 2008 IACP
Community Policing Award.
2b. Retirement Recognition for Cindy Wetzel
Mayor Jacobs read the Resolution recognizing and thanking Cindy Wetzel for her great
contributions and 21 years of service with the police department.
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 3c) Page 2
Subject: City Council Minutes December 1, 2008
3. Approval of Minutes
3a. Special Study Session Minutes October 20, 2008
The minutes were approved as presented.
3b. City Council Minutes October 20, 2008
The minutes were approved as presented.
3c. Study Session Minutes October 27, 2008
The minutes were approved as presented.
3d. Closed Executive Session November 3, 2008
The minutes were approved as presented.
3e. Special Study Session November 3, 2008
The minutes were approved as presented.
3f. City Council Minutes November 3, 2008
The minutes were approved as presented.
4. Approval of Agenda and Items on Consent Calendar
NOTE: The Consent Calendar lists those items of business which are considered to be routine
and/or which need no discussion. Consent items are acted upon by one motion. If discussion is
desired by either a Councilmember or a member of the audience, that item may be moved to an
appropriate section of the regular agenda for discussion.
4a. Approve Second Reading of Ordinance to amend the St. Louis Park Home Rule
Charter: Table of Contents, Chapters 3, 5, and Index and set publication (7
affirmative votes required).
4b. Adopt Second Reading of Ordinance No. 2364-08 amending Section 32-38 of the
City Code, approve summary, and authorize publication.
4c. Approve S & S Tree and Horticulture, Inc. as the 2009 Boulevard Tree Pruning
Contractor.
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 3c) Page 3
Subject: City Council Minutes December 1, 2008
4d. Amend Contract No. 118-08 from the original fire suppression sprinkler special
assessment of $71,785.00 and administrative fee of $359.00 to a revised amount of
$89,026.00 and administrative fee of $445.13 at 4838-4850 35th Street, St. Louis
Park, MN.
4e. Adopt Resolution No. 08-148 to recognize Cindy Wetzel’s retirement after 21
years of service to the City of St. Louis Park.
4f. Approve the Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreement and authorize
the Mayor and City Manager to execute the agreement.
4g. Approve Resolution No. 08-149 authorizing a gambling Premises Permit for
Hopkins Raspberry Festival Association, Inc., operating at Laredo’s, 4656 Excelsior
Boulevard.
4h. Approve Contract with Short Elliott Hendrickson, (SEH), Inc. for engineering
consulting services for the Highway 7 / Louisiana Avenue Interchange Project -
Project No. 2012-0100.
4i. Approve Resolution No. 08-150 accepting donations from John and Elsa Selover in
the amount of $500 and David and Maura Mitchell in the amount of $100 for
restoration of the 1928 American LaFrance fire truck.
4j. Approve Resolution No. 08-151 authorizing final payment in the amount of
$18,758.35 for the 2008 City Sealcoat Project - Project No. 2008-0001 with
Pearson Brothers, Inc., City Contract No. 88-08.
4k. Approve Resolution No. 08-152 authorizing final payment in the amount of
$3,633.50 for the 2007 Reclaiming and Repaving the Trail System in Carpenter
Park Project - Project No. 20070170 with Midwest Asphalt Corporation, City
Contract No. 48-08.
4l. Recognition of 2008 Savvy Award.
4m. Approve for filing Planning Commission Minutes November 5, 2008.
4n. Approve for filing Vendor Claims.
Mr. Harmening requested Item No. 4a be removed and placed on the December 15, 2008
Council Agenda, stating it would require all seven Council votes for approval.
It was moved by Councilmember Carver, seconded by Councilmember Paprocki, to approve
the Agenda and items listed on the Consent Calendar.
The motion passed 6-0.
5. Boards and Commissions - None
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 3c) Page 4
Subject: City Council Minutes December 1, 2008
6. Public Hearings
6a. Truth-in-Taxation Public Hearing on 2009 Budget and Property Tax Levy
Mr. DeJong presented the staff report.
Mayor Jacobs opened the public hearing at 8:13 p.m.
George Murray, Ottawa Avenue, questioned the increase as a comparison to what services
the City is providing. He further stated he couldn’t see the justification in money spent for
projects being done by the City, and used Fernhill Park as an example, further asking the
cost involved, why the park was being reconstructed, and who requested it.
Mayor Jacobs stated the community made the request.
Councilmember Sanger stated the cost was in the vicinity of $500,000. She further stated
Fernhill Park was being redone because of the drainage issues, the need for proper
maintenance updating and the various community requests for new kinds of services and
improvements to the park. Councilmember Sanger stated the neighborhood was notified
and several community meetings were held for their input on the new design.
Mr. Murray stated concern with the park not being completed and frustration over the
recent WiFi endeavor.
Mayor Jacobs stated if he wanted to blame someone, blame him.
Mr. Murray reiterated his frustration with the increases and questioned if the community
was really aware that it would affect their taxes.
Mayor Jacobs invited him to look at the City budget and tell the Council what he would
have them not do.
Mr. Murray stated they shouldn’t do the entire park, just the necessary items and asked if the
projects are paying for themselves or increasing City revenue.
Mayor Jacobs stated the projects are increasing City revenue. He further stated that nothing
in the City is done unless the community asks for it, stating the citizens know those requests
come at a cost.
Councilmember Carver suggested Mr. Murray attend the community meetings to offer his
suggestions.
Jeff Gershon, West Oak Condos, asked why his property increased so much.
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 3c) Page 5
Subject: City Council Minutes December 1, 2008
Mr. Bultema suggested Mr. Gershon meet with him to discuss his concerns on an individual
basis.
Stan Jurgensen, 2309 West Ridge Lane, reminded everyone that property taxes are higher for
businesses and apartments. Mr. Jurgensen stated there were programs to assist in paying
property taxes and gave examples such as increases of over 12%, low income not making
enough money to pay property taxes, and State paid loans for seniors.
Karen Pere, 1408 Nevada Avenue, asked why market values have not decreased. She noted
that even though property in general has gone down, it’s not yet reflected on her market
value.
Mr. Bultema stated the media statistics are not an accurate comparison and suggested they
review her case on an individual basis.
Mayor Jacobs reminded everyone that tonight’s discussion was on the levy and what the
money is being spent on.
Councilmember Paprocki stated a lot of the City’s spending isn’t always seen by the public
and reminded everyone that a lot of the money spent is what is bought. He also reminded
everyone that it’s a continuous year round process with today’s date just being the annual
Truth In Taxation Hearing. Councilmember Paprocki further stated that Parks and
Recreation also handles the fleet and it is being affected by the gas prices. He reminded
everyone that Parks and Recreation is very well funded, partially because they benefit from
Park Dedication Fees.
Mayor Jacobs stated the bottom line on government was that “it doesn’t get more expensive
because of what it costs, it gets more expensive because of what it does.”
Mayor Jacobs closed the public hearing.
7. Requests, Petitions, and Communications from the Public – None
8. Resolutions, Ordinances, Motions and Discussion Items
8a. Ellipse on Excelsior -- Rezoning, Preliminary Plat with Subdivision Variances
and Preliminary PUD (Case Nos.: 08-34-Z, 08-35-S, 08-36-PUD)
Resolution No. 08-153 and 08-154
Mr. Walther presented the staff report.
Councilmember Basill questioned the median change at the entrance. Mr. Walther stated
the median would provide a visual cue that you are entering a neighborhood. On-street
parking would be restricted adjacent to the median.
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 3c) Page 6
Subject: City Council Minutes December 1, 2008
Councilmember Sanger commended the architect on the creative plan. She asked why staff
supported to a reduction of Class I materials. Mr. Walther stated it was based on the quality
of the material used, further stating the Planning Commission gave its approval.
Councilmember Sanger stated concern with the fact that if they allowed a reduction from
80% for this project, others may make similar requests. She also stated concern over the
shading study and asked if independent reviews were done. Mr. Walther stated staff relied
on the applicant’s certified study.
Sue Williams, 3405 Glenhurst, stated concern with the shadow study, stating her house was
designed to bring in solar heat in the winter. She further suggested the developer look at
more options to help rectify her concerns. Ms. Williams also stated concern with the
entrance and that there would be no value to the neighbors by having this project proceed.
Dean Dovolis, Architect, gave an overview of the shadow study analysis and changes they
have made to the project.
Councilmember Basill asked Mr. Dovolis if they would be open to discussions with the
neighborhood if they preferred the previous buffer option. Mr. Dovolis stated they would be
open to either option.
Ms. Williams stated she would rather have trees blocking the view than an entire building’s
shadow cast upon her property.
Councilmember Omodt asked if Hardy Board was Class I or Class II. Mr. Dovolis stated by
the ordinance it is considered a Class II, but esthetically it will look like a Class I.
Councilmember Sanger clarified that the proposed landscaping could throw a larger shadow
than the building. Mr. Dovolis stated that is correct, based on the type of tree species
selected.
John Snyder, 3316 Huntington, stated concern with the zoning code in which shadowing
was written, further asking if they knew the provided shadow study was correct.
Councilmember Sanger asked if the neighborhood had seen the updated shadow studies.
John Brady stated a copy of the revised study was circulated via email to the neighborhood.
He also stated after having reviewed the proposal over the weekend, he was in full support of
the project.
Councilmember Omodt stated Hardy Board should be a Class I material and suggested staff
review the possibility of changing its classification.
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 3c) Page 7
Subject: City Council Minutes December 1, 2008
Councilmember Carver asked who pays for and/or provides the shadow studies. Mr.
Walther stated the applicant provides a certified study. Councilmember Carver further
stated he felt they should reconsider reclassifying Hardy Board.
Pat Skinner, 3632 Huntington Avenue South, stated he was present to show support for the
project.
Paul Theisen, 3404 France, stated he was in favor of the median change and concerned with
the percentage calculations the developer used for the shadow studies. He also stated he
would much rather have his property shaded by trees versus a building.
Ellen Anderson, 3336 Glenhurst, stated she was there to support her neighbor’s concerns
and pleaded with the developer to review alternatives to alleviate the shadowing concerns.
Rhea Hamp thought the project would be a wonderful addition, but did state concerns with
the shadowing issue.
Councilmember Sanger asked Mr. Dovolis what it would take to alter the project to make
significant reduction in shading for residents. Mr. Dovolis stated they have altered it as
much as they could without quite an extensive cost increase. He also explained how the sun
angle affects the amount of shadow that is cast, making it extremely difficult to change the
design further.
Councilmember Basill thanked staff, the neighborhood, and developer for their work.
Councilmember Paprocki stated he felt this is the best proposed project they’ve had for the
site.
Councilmember Omodt agreed with Councilmember Paprocki, further stating it’s the closest
match they’ve had to the neighborhood requests.
It was moved by Councilmember Basill, seconded by Councilmember Paprocki, to approve
of the first reading of an ordinance amending the Official Zoning Map to change the zoning
of 3409, 3413 and 3417 Glenhurst Avenue South and 3408 and 3412 France Avenue South
from R4 Multiple Family Residence District to MX Mixed Use District.
The motion passed 6-0.
Councilmember Basill asked if they had to do all as one motion or individually. Mr. Scott
stated they could do all as one motion, if wanted. Mr. Scott clarified that a super majority
vote is required for the PUD.
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 3c) Page 8
Subject: City Council Minutes December 1, 2008
It was moved by Councilmember Basill, seconded by Councilmember Paprocki, to approve
Resolution No. 08-153, approving Preliminary Plat of Ellipse on Excelsior with Variances
from the Subdivision Ordinance for perimeter drainage and utility easements with
conditions as stated in resolution.
The motion passed 6-0.
It was moved by Councilmember Basill, seconded by Councilmember Paprocki, to approve
Resolution No. 08-154, approving Preliminary Planned Unit Development for Ellipse on
Excelsior relating to zoning for property zoned MX-Mixed Use and R-4 Multiple Family
Residential located at 3900, 3912, 3920 Excelsior Boulevard, 3409, 3413, 3417 Glenhurst
Avenue South, and 3408, 3412, 3416 France Avenue South with conditions as stated in
resolution.
The motion passed 6-0.
9. Communications
Council sent their well wishes to Councilmember Finkelstein.
10. Adjournment
The meeting adjourned at 10:30 p.m.
______________________________________ ______________________________________
Nancy Stroth, City Clerk Jeff Jacobs, Mayor
Meeting Date: January 5, 2009
Agenda Item #: 3d
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
Joint City Council / School Board Meeting
City of St. Louis Park
Council Chambers 3rd Floor
December 8, 2008
The meeting convened at 5:18 p.m.
Council Members present: Sue Sanger, Phil Finkelstein, Loran Paprocki, John Basill, Mayor Jeff
Jacobs (arrived at 5:31), Paul Omodt (arrived at 5:40), Paul Carver (arrived at 5:50).
School Board Members present: Rolf Peterson, Larry Shapiro, Pam Rykken, Board Chair, Bruce
Richardson (arrived at 5:27), Jim Yarosh (arrived at 5:37).
School Board Members absent: Julie Sweitzer
City Staff present: Tom Harmening, City Manager; Bridget Gothberg, Organizational
Development.
School District staff present: Bob Laney, Assistant Superintendent
Meeting
The School Board dialogued and received information on the following areas:
a. Budget challenges for each organization and ways to work cooperatively.
b. Highway 7 and Wooddale project.
c. Fire Station update.
d. Importance of communication between the two bodies.
Next Meeting
The next Joint City Council and School Board meeting will be held in the Spring of 2009.
Adjournment
The meeting adjourned at 6:26 p.m.
______________________________________ ______________________________________
City Clerk Mayor
Meeting Date: January 5, 2009
Agenda Item #: 3e
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL CLOSED EXECUTIVE SESSION
DECEMBER 8, 2008
1. Roll Call
Mayor Jacobs called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m.
Councilmembers present: Mayor Jeff Jacobs, John Basill, C. Paul Carver, Phillip Finkelstein, Paul
Omodt, Loran Paprocki and Susan Sanger.
Staff present: Organizational Development (Bridget Gothberg), Facilitator.
2. Council reviewed the results of the 360 performance evaluation of the City Manager.
Bridget Gothberg, Organizational Development Coordinator facilitated the discussion
with Council.
3. Adjournment
The meeting adjourned at 7:25 p.m.
______________________________________ ______________________________________
City Clerk Mayor
Meeting Date: January 5, 2009
Agenda Item #: 3f
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
December 8, 2008
The meeting convened at 7:40 p.m.
Councilmembers present: Mayor Jeff Jacobs, C. Paul Carver, Phil Finkelstein, Paul Omodt, Loran
Paprocki, and Sue Sanger.
Council members absent: John Basill.
Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), Finance Director (Mr. DeJong), Deputy City
Manager/Human Resources Director (Ms. Gohman) and Recording Secretary (Ms. Larrea).
Guests: None.
1. Future Study Session Agenda Planning – December 15 and January 12, 2009
Mr. Harmening presented the staff report to the Council. The legislative update scheduled for
January 12 has been removed from the agenda. It is proposed that this be rescheduled for a special
study session on January 20.
Councilmember Paprocki suggested setting aside 15 minutes at the beginning of every Study Session
to allow for any necessary discussion on budget related matters.
Councilmember Sanger would like to have a discussion on the proposed zoning amendment which
would require a CUP for certain institutional uses be placed on a future agenda. It was suggested to
include this item on the January 12, 2009 agenda. Councilmember Paprocki requested a written
report in advance of this meeting which provided background on CUPs in general, when they are
used and why it may be appropriate to require them for institutional uses.
It was the consensus of the Council to have the CUP included on a Study Session agenda and
supplemented with a background report.
2. 2009 Budget
Mr. Harmening presented the staff report to the Council. The two budget items that were discussed
were Teen’s Alone and turning off the stop light at Lake and Zarthan.
Mr. Harmening confirmed that turning off the stop light would include placing a bag over the stop
light and installing stop signs. The light would be available for use in the future if need be.
Mayor Jacobs suggested putting a crossing guard at this intersection during heavy crossing times.
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 3f) Page 2
Subject: City Council Study Session Minutes December 8, 2008
It was the consensus of the Council to not change staff’s recommendation regarding turning off this
signal light and discuss it further if need be at the December 15 City Council meeting. The city
Council asked that more information on Teens Alone be included in the budget report for the
December 15 meeting
3. Employee Opinion Survey Results
Ms. Gohman discussed the employee survey which was conducted summer of 2008. Council
watched an informational video on the results of the employee survey.
Mr. Harmening noted that issues were raised regarding air quality and temperature control in City
buildings. These issues are being further investigated and somewhat alleviated with upcoming
building improvements.
Mr. Harmening advised that one idea is to implement an anonymous electronic suggestion box to
utilize new ideas and perspectives.
Councilmember Finkelstein would like to get more feedback from staff on possible budget cuts. Mr.
Harmening noted that staff suggested this be included as a discussion item at the City Council
Workshop.
Ms. Gohman noted that staff will be working on the suggestions in the employee opinion survey.
4. 2009 Council Workshop Agenda
Mr. Harmening presented the report to the Council regarding the 2009 City Council Workshop.
He noted that staff would like to include budget and financial planning as the main issues of
discussion at the workshop.
Councilmember Paprocki discussed options on how to set priorities.
Mr. Harmening suggested the Council Workshop agenda include a conversation about the
prioritization of City services and programs. The idea is to come up with creative and innovative
ideas for reshaping what the City does. If the Council can prioritize what programs and services are
important, then staff will be able to come back with thoughtful ideas.
Councilmember Sanger would like to discuss methods to get public’s opinion on the budget. She
suggested putting items in the newspaper that the public could comment on.
Councilmember Paprocki suggested that staff put together a list of items they would cut if forced to
cut one million dollars from their budget. This would prioritize the items that staff needs and the
items staff could live without.
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 3f) Page 3
Subject: City Council Study Session Minutes December 8, 2008
Councilmember Sanger noted there needs to be a discussion regarding ways to increase the City’s
revenue.
It was the consensus of the Council to have staff draft suggestions on how to go about discussing the
budget issues and then reopen the discussion at a future Study Session.
5. Communications (Verbal)
The meeting adjourned at 9:40 p.m.
Written Reports provided and documented for recording purposes only:
6. Public Art Update
______________________________________ ______________________________________
Nancy Stroth, City Clerk Jeff Jacobs, Mayor
Meeting Date: January 5, 2009
Agenda Item #: 3g
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL STUDY SESSION
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
DECEMBER 15, 2008
The meeting convened at 6:30 p.m.
Councilmembers present: Mayor Jeff Jacobs, John Basill, C. Paul Carver, Phil Finkelstein, Paul
Omodt, Loran Paprocki and Susan Sanger.
Councilmembers absent: None.
Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), Inspections Director (Mr. Hoffman), Office
Assistant (Ms. Songle) and Recording Secretary (Ms. Heintz).
Guests: Greg Ackerson and Nate Nygaard, McKinstry.
1. Energy Audit of City Facilities Preliminary Findings Presentation
Mr. Hoffman presented the staff report.
Mr. Ackerson and Mr. Nygaard described their company, McKinstry, and provided an overview of
the energy audit process, the recommended improvements for St. Louis Park, and the next steps.
Councilmember Paprocki inquired as to whether there is an energy consumption effect as staff
occupation changes are made among buildings and also asked for a definition of an energy project.
Mr. Ackerson stated that there is an impact and both short and long term advantages can be taken
with the heating/cooling load. He described the energy project process as quantifying the various
improvements and impacts, reviewing the City’s budget, and determining how to leverage and invest
those dollars into facilities. Mr. Ackerson said McKinstry’s main benefit to the City is the
company’s guarantee of costs and savings (in units of energy), using local contractors to complete the
work, using its current budget amounts to repay capital costs for improvements within a specified
payback time.
Mr. Nygaard described the work synergy among cultural, operation, and capital changes, describing
proposed improvements, including the building automation system, dehumidification system,
building envelope, lighting, vending machine controls, computer shutdown program, water
efficiency, thermal solar application, active energy management, online tracking program, and
web-based information for community access.
Councilmember Paprocki requested further information about the cost analysis process. The
response was that the utility bills are analyzed and the company works with City staff to review,
refine, and finalize project scopes.
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 3g) Page 2
Subject: City Council Special Study Session Minutes December 15, 2008
Councilmember Sanger asked how savings are evaluated sufficiently to justify implementation of
new capital costs. The response was that the ultimate justification is made by City staff and Council
criteria, but statute leverage designates up to a maximum 20-year payback of the package which
could be designed for a shorter payback period if desired.
Councilmember Basill asked whether the company would guarantee savings and recommendations.
The response was affirmative, adding that McKinstry would perform the design, engineering and
contracting responsibilities to ensure the project meets the desired energy savings.
Next steps:
• December 2008 - proceed with project development agreement to perform detailed engineering
study agreement
• January through March 2009 - conduct detailed engineering study - review, refine, and finalize
project scopes with City staff - develop funding strategies
• April 2009 - present summary of engineering study to Council
Mr. Ackerson reiterated that usually the owner assumes all the risk in such a project but, utilizing
McKinstry, his company will take the risk for cost and performance.
Councilmember Finkelstein asked how McKinstry would make money on the project. Mr.
Ackerson said it would be through open fees (10% overhead and 8% profit), included in the
implementation portion of the process, and various funding mechanisms would be available to the
City. The current cost to the City is $24,500 for doing the audit alone, not going forward; and if
going forward, the audit costs would be wrapped into the overall project amount.
Councilmember Finkelstein asked whether there is interplay with the City’s requirement to select a
lowest bidder for a project and the State statute exemption. Mr. Ackerson responded affirmatively
and described this project’s criteria for an exemption status designation.
Councilmember Sanger stated that she wants to know the estimated life of the various City buildings
when the subject comes up for discussion in the future.
It was Council consensus that the project move forward.
Councilmember Sanger requested that, in addition to the website idea to share information,
knowledge be leveraged to help educate the community about what else they could learn for their
own buildings.
The meeting adjourned at 7:20 p.m.
Written Reports provided and documented for recording purposes only:
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 3g) Page 3
Subject: City Council Special Study Session Minutes December 15, 2008
2. Update on Contract Extensions for Development of Vacant City Lots Located at 5609
Wood Lane and 2715 Monterey Avenue.
______________________________________ ______________________________________
Nancy Stroth, City Clerk Jeff Jacobs, Mayor
Meeting Date: January 5, 2009
Agenda Item #: 3h
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
DECEMBER 15, 2008
1. Call to Order
Mayor Jacobs called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
Councilmembers present: Mayor Jeff Jacobs, John Basill, C. Paul Carver, Phil Finkelstein, Paul
Omodt, Loran Paprocki and Susan Sanger.
Councilmembers absent: None.
Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), City Attorney (Mr. Scott), Community Coordinator
(Mr. Zwilling), Superintendent of Parks & Recreation (Mr. Birno), Director of Parks & Recreation
(Ms. Walsh) Finance Director (Mr. DeJong), Assistant Finance Director (Mr. Swanson),
Community Development Director (Mr. Locke), Planning & Zoning Supervisor (Ms. McMonigal),
Assistant Zoning Administrator (Mr. Morrison), Human Resource Coordinator (Ms. Fosse) Chief
Information Officer (Mr. Pires), Senior Planner (Mr. Walther) and Recording Secretary (Ms.
Heintz).
2. Presentations
2a. St. Louis Park Historical Society Donation to Beehive Restoration Project
Mayor Jacobs, along with Mr. Birno, accepted and thanked the Historical Society for their
$10,000 donation to the Beehive Restoration Project.
3. Approval of Minutes
3a. Study Session Minutes November 10, 2008
The minutes were approved as presented.
3b. Special Study Session Minutes November 17, 2008
The minutes were approved as presented.
3c. City Council Minutes November 17, 2008
The minutes were approved as presented.
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 3h) Page 2
Subject: City Council Minutes December 15, 2008
4. Approval of Agenda and Items on Consent Calendar
NOTE: The Consent Calendar lists those items of business which are considered to be routine
and/or which need no discussion. Consent items are acted upon by one motion. If discussion is
desired by either a Councilmember or a member of the audience, that item may be moved to an
appropriate section of the regular agenda for discussion.
4a. Approve the Second Reading of Ordinance 2365-08 to amend the St. Louis Park
Home Rule Charter: Table of Contents, Chapters 3, 5, and Index and set
publication (7 affirmative votes required).
4b. Adopt Resolution No. 08-155, accepting the equipment replacement schedule
budgeted for 2009 and authorize staff to acquire equipment as allowed by Statute,
Charter, or Ordinance.
4c. Adopt the Second Reading of Ordinance 2366-08 amending the Official Zoning
Map to change the zoning of 3409, 3413 and 3417 Glenhurst Avenue South and
3408 and 3412 France Avenue South from R4 - Multiple Family Residence District
to MX - Mixed Use District, approve summary ordinance and authorize publication.
4d. Approve Amendment No. 1 to Agreement 14-04 with T-Mobile (Voice Stream
Minneapolis Inc.) at Elevated Water Tower No. 4 (EWT #4), located at 2541
Nevada Ave. So.
4e. Approve Amendment No. 1 to Contract No. 127-07 with ENSR Consulting and
Engineering for consultant services related to the implementation of the Reilly Tar &
Chemical Corporation (Reilly) Remedial Action Plan (RAP) during year 2009.
4f. Adopt the Water Supply Plan approved by the Department of Natural Resources.
4g. Accept Donation from St. Louis Park Historical Society in the amount of $10,000
for the Beehive Restoration project
4h. Accept for Filing Planning Commission Minutes November 19, 2008.
4i. Accept for Filing Police Advisory Commission Minutes November 5, 2008.
4j. Accept for Filing Human Rights Commission Minutes August 19, 2008.
4k. Accept for Filing Human Rights Commission Minutes September 16, 2008.
4l. Accept for Filing Housing Authority Minutes November 12, 2008.
4m. Approve for Filing Vendor Claims.
It was moved by Mayor Jacobs to approve the Agenda and items listed on the Consent
Calendar.
The motion passed 7-0.
5. Boards and Commissions
5a. Reappointment of Citizen Representatives to Boards and Commissions
Councilmembers requested spelling corrections to the names of Carl Roberts and Claudia
Johnson-Madison on the submitted reappointment roster.
Mayor Jacobs thanked board and commission members for their service to the City.
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 3h) Page 3
Subject: City Council Minutes December 15, 2008
It was moved by Councilmember Sanger, seconded by Councilmember Paprocki, to
reappoint Commissioners as City representatives to their respective commissions.
The motion passed 7-0.
6. Public Hearings
6a. Ellipse on Excelsior - Public Hearing and First Reading of Ordinance Vacating
Easements (Case No. 08-39-VAC)
Staff presented their report to the Council.
Mayor Jacobs opened the public hearing at 7:41 p.m. There being no speakers, Mayor
Jacobs closed the public hearing at 7:41 p.m.
It was moved by Councilmember Basill, seconded by Councilmember Finkelstein, to
approve the First Reading of an Ordinance vacating easements for the Ellipse on Excelsior
redevelopment and set the Second Reading of Ordinance for January 5, 2009.
The motion passed 7-0.
7. Requests, Petitions, and Communications from the Public – None
8. Resolutions, Ordinances, Motions and Discussion Items
8a. Adoption of 2009 Budget, Property Tax, and HRA Levies
Resolution No.s 08-156 and 08-157
Mr. DeJong presented the staff report and a question of clarification was answered.
It was moved by Councilmember Paprocki, seconded by Councilmember Finkelstein, to
adopt Resolution 08-156, approving the Budget for 2009 and approving the 2008 Property
Tax Levy collectible in 2009.
The motion passed 7-0.
It was moved by Councilmember Sanger, seconded by Councilmember Paprocki, to adopt
Resolution 08-157, authorizing the HRA Levy for 2009.
The motion passed 7-0.
Mayor Jacobs thanked staff for their work on the budget and levy.
8b. Summary and Acceptance of City Manager Evaluation
Resolution No. 08-158
Ms. Fosse presented the staff report.
Mayor Jacobs commented that the City is very fortunate to have Mr. Harmening, who does
a great job balancing various responsibilities and creating and taking risks to meet the needs
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 3h) Page 4
Subject: City Council Minutes December 15, 2008
of the City and its employees. He said a 360-degree Checkpoint evaluation tool was used
this year in his evaluation, which resulted in a very favorable rating of 4.5 out of 5.
It was moved by Councilmember Carver, seconded by Councilmember Sanger, to adopt
Resolution 08-158, for formal acceptance of the final City Manager annual evaluation.
The motion passed 7-0.
8c. 2009 Employee Compensation
Resolution No. 08-159
Ms. Fosse presented the staff report.
It was moved by Councilmember Sanger, seconded by Councilmember Paprocki, to adopt
Resolution 08-159, confirming a 3% general increase for non-union employees, setting
salary for City Manager, continuing the Volunteer Firefighter Benefit Program, increasing
Performance Program Pay for Paid-on-Call Firefighters by 3% for 2009, and adding a
Health Care Savings Plan transfer to the Personnel Manual.
The motion passed 7-0.
8d. 5005 Highway 7 – Nordic Ware Major Amendment to a Special Permit
Resolution No. 08-160
Mr. Locke presented the staff report and questions of clarification were answered.
It was moved by Councilmember Carver, seconded by Councilmember Paprocki, to adopt
Resolution 08-160, approving a Major Amendment to a Special Permit for the property at
5005 Highway 7.
The motion passed 7-0.
8e. First Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendments Relating to Communication
Towers and Antennas
Mr. Morrison presented the staff report.
Mayor Jacobs opened the floor to the applicant.
Chris Dahl, 5404 Interlachen Boulevard, stated his opposition to an ordinance prohibiting
towers in flood plains and wetlands and requested, should such an ordinance be adopted this
evening, that Council grandfather his property in, as he had spent considerable time and
money working to process the original ordinance change.
Councilmember Sanger asked staff whether requirements for multi-family districts are the
same as single-family. The response was that setbacks are the same from all residential
zoning districts: two times tower collapse distance.
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 3h) Page 5
Subject: City Council Minutes December 15, 2008
Councilmember Finkelstein inquired about varying opinions by the Planning Commission
and staff regarding the wetlands exemption. Mr. Morrison noted the Commission
recommended not including but staff believes it appropriate as a discussion point. The City
has few remaining open space areas, which are assets to the Community, and the attempt
when reviewing ordinances is to protect those open spaces.
Discussion ensued regarding filling wetlands for tower versus warehouse.
Councilmember Sanger pointed out that it makes sense to keep a restriction and prevent
additional towers from being constructed in wetlands and residents have made it clear that
the City should promote environmental protection when possible.
Councilmember Omodt asked Mr. Dahl what the proposed ordinance would do to him, and
Mr. Dahl responded that it would make his site nonconforming. Mr. Morrison added that
it would make the property legally nonconforming but he could modify and put additional
antennas on towers but not increase the height of towers or add additional towers. Mr.
Dahl’s site is zoned industrial, and he would be able to increase towers to 199 feet.
Councilmember Finkelstein inquired about requirements cited by the various governing
bodies protecting open spaces. Discussion ensued regarding limits and proposed ordinance
changes for Conditional Use Permits and Permitted with Conditions of the various zoning
districts, as well as differentiations among flood plain, flood fringe, and floodway districts.
Mr. Morrison stated that staff believes, ultimately, that a communication tower could be
placed somewhere else.
Councilmember Basill thanked City staff for their work, stated that the applicant is trying to
do something that wasn’t defined, acknowledged the tremendous amount of public process
and feedback for the application, and cited concerns about a nonconforming use that may or
may not be all right and unattended consequences.
Councilmember Sanger noted that the applicant’s 199-foot tower is already nonconforming,
taller than the current height limitation of 168 feet permitted by the district.
Mayor Jacobs said he agrees with the Planning Commission’s stance on the wetland issue
and the options are to pass the ordinance as written with the prohibition identified on page
23 of the proposal and ask staff to get additional information; pass the ordinance without the
exception; or, study the issue in more detail.
Councilmember Paprocki made a motion, seconded by Councilmember Carver, to approve
the First Reading of an ordinance relating to Communication Towers and Antennas as
presented, with the exception that the tower not be allowed in the DNR wetlands area and
flood plane.
Discussion ensued among the Council regarding intent and wording of the motion.
Councilmember Paprocki said a reason to have requirements in the wetlands is concern for
the ecology effects (and would leave judging of that to the DNR) and that he would be all
right with a tower except for flashing, which is intrusive. He agreed with Councilmembers
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 3h) Page 6
Subject: City Council Minutes December 15, 2008
Carver’s and Sanger’s comments that requiring a CUP in the park and open space district
would bring balance and assure public process and that the language stay as written,
requiring a CUP up to the 70 foot maximum.
Councilmember Basill made an amendment to the motion that the wetland restriction be
removed but a Conditional Use Permit be required, remove restriction against building
inside the wetlands, and consider permitting heights up to 45 feet without a CUP in the
parks and open space district.
Councilmember Paprocki reworded the motion, seconded by Councilmember Carver, to
approve the First Reading of an ordinance relating to Communication Towers and Antennas
as presented, with the exception of removal of 3A and 3B on page 23 relating to prohibiting
communication towers in wetlands and floodplains, and allow towers in the parks and open
space district up to 45 feet as a permitted use without a Conditional Use Permit.
The motion failed 1(Councilmember Paprocki)-6.
Councilmember Carver made a motion, seconded by Councilmember Basill, to approve the
First Reading of an ordinance relating to Communication Towers and Antennas, with the
only change being related to wetlands, with the intent being that towers proposed in
wetlands would have to comply with the requirements that are outlined in the drafted
ordinance and require a Conditional Use Permit, and set the Second Reading for January 5,
2009.
The motion passed 5-2 (Councilmembers Paprocki and Omodt opposed).
8f. First Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendments relating to “Service” Land
Uses in the Office (O) Zoning District
Mr. Morrison presented the staff report.
It was moved by Councilmember Sanger, seconded by Councilmember Paprocki, to approve
the First Reading of an ordinance relating to “Service” land uses in the Office zoning district,
and set the Second Reading for January 5, 2009.
Councilmember Omodt said there is need to make sure enforcement remains the same. Mr.
Morrison stated that licensing requirements would be the same.
Councilmember Carver recommended that “but is not limited to” wording be eliminated in
the future, as it is not necessary.
The motion passed 7-0.
8g. Bid Tabulation: City Building Telephone System Replacement Project –
Project No. 2008-0211
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 3h) Page 7
Subject: City Council Minutes December 15, 2008
Mr. Pires presented the staff report on the system project, which has an expected delivery
date of May 31, 2009, at a cost of $296,000 to $303,629. Council questions of clarification
were answered.
It was moved by Councilmember Finkelstein, seconded by Councilmember Basill, to reject
all bids and authorize staff to engage the services of LOGIS to replace the City campus
telephone system, provide required hardware and software from the State (already bid)
contract, and provide on-going telephone system maintenance services at a capital cost not to
exceed $303,629. On-going maintenance services may be canceled with 7 months notice and
obtained from an alternate managed service provider or provisioned with existing or
additional in-house staff.
The motion passed 7-0.
Mayor Jacobs thanked City staff and the committee and commented that it will be
important and good to add personal contact into the communication calculation.
9. Communications
Councilmember Finkelstein apologized for being unable to attend the December 1 Council meeting,
which was due to a medical emergency.
Mayor Jacobs thanked the Council for their work to address the City’s challenges during the year,
described members as working well together to disagree with each other respectfully, and then
wished everyone a Happy New Year.
10. Adjournment
The meeting adjourned at 9:38 p.m.
______________________________________ ______________________________________
Nancy Stroth, City Clerk Jeff Jacobs, Mayor
Meeting Date: January 5, 2009
Agenda Item #: 4a
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
2009 City Council Meeting Dates.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to Adopt Resolution Declaring 2009 City Council Meeting Dates.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
The St. Louis Park City Council Rules and Procedures require Council to set and approve meeting
dates each year.
BACKGROUND:
The City Council's policy is not to meet on New Year's Day, Martin Luther King Day, President's
Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Veteran's Day, Christmas Day, Rosh
Hashanah, Yom Kippur, and Passover. For New Year's Day, Christmas Day, and Yom Kippur, this
includes the evening before the holiday. For Rosh Hashanah and Passover, this includes the evening
before the holiday and the first and second evenings of the holiday.
Regular meetings will be held on the first and third Mondays of each month at 7:30 p.m. A
schedule of all regular meetings and recognized holidays will be kept on file at City Hall. Regular
meetings can be cancelled or rescheduled at any time, provided Council meets at least once per
month.
Current policy states that when the meeting date falls on a holiday, the meeting will be scheduled on
the next succeeding day that is not a holiday, unless another day has been designated in advance. If
the Tuesday is also a holiday, the meeting is moved to the same hour on the next succeeding
Monday that is not a holiday. Council also has the discretion to move the meeting to the
Wednesday following the first two evenings of each holiday observance if deemed necessary at that
time.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
Attachments: Resolution
Prepared by: Kris Luedke, Office Assistant
Reviewed by: Nancy Stroth, City Clerk
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 4a) Page 2
Subject: 2009 City Council Meeting Dates
RESOLUTION NO. 09-_____
RESOLUTION DECLARING
2009 CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATES
WHEREAS, the City Council Rules and Procedures require Council to annually declare its
public meetings for the year, and
WHEREAS, the City Council takes holidays into consideration when declaring public
meetings and has chosen to not meet on New Year's Day, Martin Luther King Day, President's Day,
Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Veteran's Day, Christmas Day, Rosh Hashanah,
Yom Kippur, and Passover of each year. For New Year’s Day, Christmas Day and Yom Kippur, this
includes the evening before the holiday. For Rosh Hashanah and Passover, this includes the evening
before the holiday and the first and second evenings of the holiday, and
WHEREAS, regular meetings will be held on the first and third Mondays of each month at
7:30 p.m. If the meeting date falls on a holiday, the meeting will be scheduled on the next
succeeding day that is not a holiday, unless another day has been designated in advance. Regular
meetings can be cancelled or rescheduled at any time, provided Council meets at least once per
month, and
WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes that not all religious holidays are included in this
resolution and the Council makes it known that reasonable accommodation will be made for
religious reasons when notified by an applicant or a member of the public,
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of St. Louis Park has
reviewed Exhibit A and declares those dates to be the public meeting dates of the City Council.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council January 5, 2009
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 4a) Page 3
Subject: 2009 City Council Meeting Dates
Exhibit A
2009 City Council Meeting Dates
Jan. 5 Regular Meeting July 6 Regular Meeting
Jan. 12 Study Session July 13 Study Session
July 20 Regular Meeting Jan. 20
Regular Meeting - Tuesday
(Monday-Martin Luther King Jr. Day)
Jan. 26 Study Session July 27 Study Session
Feb. 2 Regular Meeting Aug. 3 Regular Meeting
Feb. 9 Study Session Aug. 10 Study Session
Feb. 17
Regular Meeting - Tuesday
(Monday-President’s Day)
Aug. 17 Regular Meeting
Feb. 23 Study Session Aug. 24 Study Session
Mar. 2 Regular Meeting Sept. 8
Regular Meeting - Tuesday
(Monday-Labor Day)
Mar. 9 Study Session Sept. 14
Study Session
Mar. 16 Regular Meeting Sept. 21 Regular Meeting
Mar. 23 Study Session Sept. 29 Study Session – Tuesday
(Monday-Yom Kippur)
April 6 Regular Meeting Oct. 5 Regular Meeting
April 13 Study Session Oct. 12 Study Session
April 20 Regular Meeting
April 27 Study Session
Oct. 19
Oct. 26
Regular Meeting
Study Session
May 4 Regular Meeting Nov. 2 Regular Meeting
May 11 Study Session Nov. 9 Study Session
May 18 Regular Meeting Nov. 16 Regular Meeting
May 26
Study Session – Tuesday
(Monday-Memorial Day)
Nov. 23 Study Session
June 1 Regular Meeting Dec. 7 Regular Meeting
June 8 Study Session Dec. 14 Study Session
June 15 Regular Meeting Dec. 21 Regular Meeting
June 22 Study Session Dec. 28 Study Session
Meeting Date: January 5, 2009
Agenda Item #: 4b
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
2009 Official Newspaper Designation.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to Approve Resolution designating the St. Louis Park Sun Sailor as the City’s Official
Newspaper for year 2009.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
MS 331A.02 and Charter Section 3.07 require that a legal newspaper of general circulation be
designated for publication of the City’s official proceedings and notices and such other matters and
measures as are required by law and City Charter. Does Council wish to continue designation of the
St. Louis Park Sun Sailor as the City’s Official Newspaper for Calendar Year 2009?
BACKGROUND:
Sun Newspapers has become the primary source of community news in the suburbs. In 2006 staff
met with Sun Newspapers regarding distribution practices and policies within our community.
Since then, Sun Newspapers has provided additional newspaper copies at City Hall, Rec Center and
library; provided information on how to subscribe and access via the web; and has provided a
discount to the City for advertisements.
BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION:
1. The paper is delivered to most of the residences in the City and easily accessible via the Internet,
thereby providing city-wide coverage of legal notices and other city government issues to
residents.
2. The paper has served well as the official newspaper for many years.
3. The paper has expressed a desire to continue to provide this service.
4. New residents receive information regarding distribution of the Sun-Sailor Newspaper in their
new resident packet.
5. All legal notices are posted on Sun Sailor’s website at no additional charge.
6. Two notarized affidavits on each publication are provided at no additional charge.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
The cost for legal publications through the St. Louis Park Sun-Sailor is reasonable and they are not
increasing rates for the coming year.
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 4b) Page 2
Subject: 2009 Official Newspaper Designation
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
Attachments: Resolution
Letter from Sun Newspapers
Prepared by: Kris Luedke, Office Assistant
Reviewed by: Nancy Stroth, City Clerk
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 4b) Page 3
Subject: 2009 Official Newspaper Designation
RESOLUTION NO. 09-______
RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE ST. LOUIS PARK
SUN SAILOR AS THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER
FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2009
WHEREAS, MS 331A.02 and Charter Section 3.07 require that a legal newspaper of
general circulation be designated for publication of the City’s official proceedings and notices and
such other matters and measures as are required by law and City Charter; and
WHEREAS, the St. Louis Park Sun Sailor is a duly qualified medium of legal publication;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the St. Louis Park City Council hereby
designates the St. Louis Park Sun Sailor as the City’s Official Newspaper for Calendar Year 2009.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council January 5, 2009
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 4b) Page 4
Subject: 2009 Official Newspaper Designation
Meeting Date: January 5, 2009
Agenda Item #: 4c
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Award of the 2009 St. Louis Park Arts and Culture Grants.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to Adopt Resolution Authorizing Award of the 2009 St. Louis Park Arts and Culture
Grants.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
The St. Louis Park Arts & Culture Grant program funds art projects and cultural activities that
build bridges between artists and communities, engage people in creative learning, and promote
artistic production and cultural experiences in St. Louis Park. Does the Council agree that the
recommended projects are consistent with the intent of the program?
BACKGROUND:
The Council has supported the Arts and Culture Grant program since its inception in 2006. The
grant application for 2009 was released in September with an October 31 deadline. This process
allows grantees one full year to complete their projects.
For 2009 grant funds, twelve applications were received. $20,000 has been included in the 2009
budget for this program and the St. Louis Park Community Foundation has committed an
additional $2,500. Their generous gift equates to a total of $22,500 available to fund arts related
proposals in 2009.
The St. Louis Park Arts & Culture Grants review committee, comprised of the Community
Foundation, St. Louis Park Friends of the Arts, St. Louis Park Schools, city staff and community
members, reviewed the applications and identified applicants whose proposals best met the objectives
of the program and are compatible with the Council’s 18-month strategic direction on Vision for
arts, culture and community aesthetics. From the twelve applicants, requests for funding totaled
$34,815.45.
The review committee is recommending seven arts related projects for Council’s consideration,
totaling $22,115.45. The committee is not making a recommendation for the remaining dollars
($384.55) at this time.
The following is a short summary of each project based on information in the proposals:
Whitney Blount (36 Arts Magazine) - $500 to assist in the printing of an annual literary arts
magazine of submissions by St. Louis Park High School students for distribution in May 2009.
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 4c) Page 2
Subject: Award of the 2009 St. Louis Park Arts and Culture Grants
Children First - $4,272.45 to assist with the painting and reproduction of 40 original works of art
representing the 40 Developmental Assets upon which Children First is based. Those 40 original
works will be reproduced into a poster that will allow Children First to educate the wider
community through art about the Children First philosophy. The paintings will be created by 40
diverse groups with the assistance of 40 yet-to-be identified artists with the assistance of Michael
Christiansen, the illustrator of the Super Heroes Coloring Book. Children First is anticipating a
gallery opening of the 40 works of art at The Children First Ice Cream Social in May 2009.
Margaret Coleman- $1,975 to work in collaboration with senior citizens to record and share,
through the paper making, their memories, experiences and building of the St. Louis Park
community. Ms. Coleman is an emerging Midwest artist finishing her Masters of Fine Arts at Pratt
Institute in New York. She will be working with Joshua Hosterman, a member of the Tilsner Artist
Cooperative in St. Paul, who works in sculpture and sound installation. The project will begin in
August 2009 with paper making workshops, manifesting itself in two mixed media art openings
open to the public.
Harmony Theater Company and School – $3,328 to assist in the creation and production of a
play about the Leningrad Siege, with a special focus on the children living in that city during World
War II. The Siege of Leningrad (formerly known as St. Petersburg) was one of the longest and
cruelest sieges in the world’s military history. St. Louis Park and other local war survivors will be
interviewed. Based on 2005 American Community Survey’s language records, there are an estimated
25,000 Russian-speaking residents in the seven county area. Performances are planned at the Sabes
JCC Theatre June 2009.
Meadowbrook Collaborative - $1,070 to assist in the creation of ARTWORKS a structured weekly
program that will teach 10 motivated children in grades 3 to 6 the basic understanding of drawing.
In addition to art exploration, the program will promote development of the participant’s cognitive,
social and emotion skills. Local artist Jon Reiss will run the program beginning in mid-January
2009. The community will be invited to a celebration of the art created on June 11, 2009.
Denise Tennen – $6,970 to assist in the creation of a series of ceramic relief panels to be
permanently installed at Aquila Primary Center, Lenox Community Center and other publicly
accessible buildings in St. Louis Park. The ceramic relief panels will be created by St. Louis Park’s
youngest (Aquila Primary Center students) and oldest (senior groups such as Lenox Senior Center
members as well as senior residence, assisted living and nursing home dwellers) community members
that will build awareness of the six themes of the elementary level International Baccalaureate
curriculum.
Zenon Dance Company - $4,000 for a one-week outreach dance residence at Peter Hobart Primary
Center. Zenon Dance Company will work with 4 classes per day and approximately 100 students
total. During the residency, students will learn basic dance skills and create dances around a
curriculum topic which are structured to stimulate, challenge, entertain and educate. The residency
will conclude with a final student performance open to the community at Peter Hobart.
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 4c) Page 3
Subject: Award of the 2009 St. Louis Park Arts and Culture Grants
Participants will also be invited to attend a free matinee during Zenon’s fall 2009 season at the
Southern Theater in Minneapolis.
OTHER:
Still under consideration is an application from the Aquila Neighborhood Association. The proposal
would create a decorative mural of the neighborhood logo on a 12’x10’ concrete pad along the bike
path at Aquila Park near Aquila Avenue and 33rd Street. The timeline of the project coincides with
the neighborhood’s 10 year anniversary. The development of this artistically created destination spot
for local residents will be a lasting impression of longevity and purpose of the Aquila Neighborhood
Association.
The St. Louis Park Arts & Culture Review Committee will meet with Aquila Neighborhood
representatives in January 2009 to further discuss their grant proposal. The funding for this project
may be provided in whole or part by the St. Louis Park Community Foundation, which has
proposed creating a pilot program through the Arts & Culture Grant Program to encourage other
neighborhoods to incorporate artistic elements and art installation in St. Louis Park neighborhoods.
Staff will update the Council on the status of this project and the pilot program once the review
committee and neighborhood have met.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
The St. Louis Park Arts and Culture Program is a budgeted item for 2009 and is supplemented with
a $2,500 grant from the St. Louis Park Community Foundation. St. Louis Park Friends of the Arts
provides technical assistance to the program and its recipients.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Award of the 2009 St. Louis Park Arts and Culture Grants follows the St. Louis Park Strategic
Directions 18-Month Guide adopted on March 19, 2007 by committing to promoting and
integrating arts, culture and community aesthetics in all City initiatives, including implementation
where appropriate.
Attachment: Resolution
Prepared by: Lisa Songle, Office Assistant
Reviewed by: Marcia Honold, Management Assistant
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 4c) Page 4
Subject: Award of the 2009 St. Louis Park Arts and Culture Grants
RESOLUTION NO. 09-___
MOTION TO AUTHORIZE AWARD OF ST. LOUIS PARK ARTS & CULTURE GRANTS
TO WHITNEY BLOUNT (36 ARTS MAGAZINE), CHILDREN FIRST, MARGARET
COLEMAN, HARMONY THEATER COMPANY & SCHOOL, MEADOWBROOK
COLLABORATIVE, DENISE TENNEN AND THE ZENON DANCE COMPANY
WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park, the St. Louis Park Community Foundation and Friends
of the Arts worked together to create and support a $22,500 grant program to fund art projects and
cultural activities that build bridges between artists and communities, engage people in creative learning,
and promote artistic production and cultural experiences in St. Louis Park; and
WHEREAS, thirteen applicants responded to the call for proposals and were evaluated by a
committee comprised of representatives of the St. Louis Park Community Foundation, St. Louis Park
Friends of the Arts, St. Louis Park Schools, the city, and community members; and
WHEREAS, the committee recommends the City Council fund seven (7) grant proposals for a
total of $22,115.45: Whitney Blount (36 Arts Magazine), Children First, Margaret Coleman, Harmony
Theater Company & School, Meadowbrook Collaborative, Denise Tennen and the Zenon Dance
Company.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of St. Louis
Park, Minnesota, authorizes execution of grant agreements with the following organizations based on the
review committee’s recommendations and the applicants’ proposals.
1. Whitney Blount (36 Arts Magazine) is awarded a maximum of $500.
2. Children First is awarded a maximum of $4,272.45.
3. Margaret Coleman is awarded a maximum of $1,975.
4. Harmony Theatre Company and School is awarded a maximum of $3,328.
5. Meadowbrook Collaborative is awarded a maximum of $1,070.
6. Denise Tennen is awarded a maximum of $6,970.
7. Zenon Dance Company is awarded a maximum of $4,000.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council January 5, 2009
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Meeting Date: January 5, 2009
Agenda Item #: 4d
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Ellipse on Excelsior – Second Reading of Ordinance Vacating Easements (Case No. 08-39-VAC).
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:
Motion to Approve Second Reading of Ordinance vacating easements for the Ellipse on Excelsior
redevelopment, approve summary ordinance and authorize publication.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Is there a need for the easements that are proposed to be vacated?
BACKGROUND:
The Ellipse on Excelsior redevelopment site is located on the northwest corner of France Avenue and
Excelsior Boulevard. It includes nine lots addressed 3900, 3912, 3920 Excelsior Boulevard; 3409,
3413, 3417 Glenhurst Avenue South; and 3408, 3412, 3416 France Avenue South. City Council
approved a preliminary plat that will combine all nine lots into one lot, and a preliminary planned
unit development (PUD) for a mixed use building on the property. The applicant requests vacation
of six existing easements to accommodate the Ellipse on Excelsior redevelopment. Vacations are
approved by ordinance. City Council held the public hearing and unanimously approved the first
reading of the ordinance on December 15, 2008.
Provided below is a list and brief description of the six easements to be vacated. The numbers
correspond to labels on the attached Index Map.
1. Drainage and utility easement per MINIKAHDA OAKS plat
• Perimeter easements dedicated on the MINIKAHDA OAKS plat
• Overhead electric lines are partially within this easement
• Developer proposes to relocate overhead electric lines
2. A portion of a sanitary sewer easement per Doc. Nos. 2695611 and 2698090
• Easement over an existing 8-inch sanitary sewer main
• Developer proposes to relocate sanitary sewer within the development site
3. Easement for utility purposes per Doc. No. 6921887
• Easement for existing lift station control panel
• Developer proposes to relocate lift station control panel
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 4d) Page 2
Subject: Ellipse on Excelsior – Second Reading of Ordinance Vacating Easements (Case No. 08-39-VAC)
4. A portion of a sanitary sewer easement dedicated in Doc. No. 2650579
• Unused sanitary sewer easement
• ELLIPSE ON EXCELSIOR plat dedicates a drainage and utility easement that will
envelop and replace this easement
5. Easement for landscape purposes per Doc. No. 6717492
• Acquired for Excelsior Boulevard streetscape improvements and maintenance
• Existing landscape planter to be removed
6. Three feet wide landscape easement per Doc. No. 6733686
• Acquired for Excelsior Boulevard streetscape improvements and maintenance
• Existing landscape planter to be removed
Several of the above easements relate to either standard perimeter easements required when the lots
were initially platted or existing utilities that will be relocated. Essentially, the ELLIPSE ON
EXCELSIOR plat logically replaces these easements based on the proposed development plan.
Easements numbers 1, 2, 3 and 4 fit into this category.
Two easements, numbers 5 and 6, relate to landscaping improvements to be removed. The
proposed development landscape plan provides attractive and suitable replacements for these two
existing landscape areas.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
Attachments: Ordinance and Summary
Index Map showing easements to be vacated
Prepared by: Sean Walther, Senior Planner
Reviewed by: Meg McMonigal, Planning & Zoning Supervisor
Kevin Locke, Community Development Director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 4d) Page 3
Subject: Ellipse on Excelsior – Second Reading of Ordinance Vacating Easements (Case No. 08-39-VAC)
ORDINANCE NO._____-09
AN ORDINANCE VACATING DRAINAGE, UTILITY, SANITARY SEWER, AND
LANDSCAPING EASEMENTS AT
3900, 3912 and 3920 Excelsior Boulevard
3409, 3413 and 3417 Glenhurst Avenue South
3408, 3412 and 3416 France Avenue South
THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK DOES ORDAIN:
Section 1. A petition in writing signed by a majority of all of the owners of all property
abutting upon both sides of the easements proposed to be vacated has been duly filed. The notice of
said petition has been published in the St. Louis Park Sailor on December 4, 2008 and the City
Council has conducted a public hearing upon said petition and has determined that the easements
are not needed for public purposes, and that it is for the best interest of the public that said
easements be vacated.
Section 2. The easements described on attached Exhibits “A” through “F” as now
dedicated and laid out within the corporate limits of the City of St. Louis Park, are vacated.
Section 3. The City Clerk is instructed to record certified copies of this ordinance in the
Office of the Hennepin County Register of Deeds or Registrar of Titles as the case may be.
Section 4. This Ordinance shall take effect upon relocation of the utilities and recording
of the ELLIPSE ON EXCELSIOR final plat with Hennepin County, and not less than fifteen days
after its publication.
First Reading December 15, 2008
Second Reading January 5, 2009
Date of Publication January 15, 2009
Date Ordinance takes effect January 30, 2009
Adopted by the City Council January 5, 2009
Reviewed for Administration
City Manager Mayor
Attest: Approved as to Form and Execution:
City Clerk City Attorney
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 4d) Page 4
Subject: Ellipse on Excelsior – Second Reading of Ordinance Vacating Easements (Case No. 08-39-VAC)
EXHIBIT “A”
Description of Easement to be Vacated
That particular utility easement originally dedicated in Document Number 6921887, Office of the
County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and now to be vacated, described as follows:
The Northwesterly 12.00 feet of Southeasterly 14.00 feet of the Southwesterly 10.00 feet of the
following described tract of land:
That part of the Northeast ¼ of the Southeast ¼ of Section 6, Township 28 North, Range
24 West of the 4th Principal Meridian, described as follows: Commencing at a point on the
Southwesterly line of “Minikahda Oaks, Hennepin County, Minnesota” which point is 50
feet Northwesterly at right angles from the center line of Excelsior Avenue also known as
U.S. Trunk Highway #169, thence Southwesterly parallel with the center line of Excelsior
Avenue a distance of 30 feet to the actual point of beginning of the tract to be described,
thence Northwesterly along a line drawn at right angles to said Excelsior Avenue, a distance
of 190 feet; thence Southwesterly parallel with the center line of Excelsior Avenue a distance
of 140 feet; thence Southeasterly along a line drawn at right angles to Excelsior Avenue a
distance of 190 feet to a point 50 feet Northwesterly at right angles from the center line of
said Excelsior Avenue; thence Northeasterly parallel with said center line 140 feet to the
actual point of beginning, according to the United States Government Survey thereof and
situate in Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 4d) Page 5
Subject: Ellipse on Excelsior – Second Reading of Ordinance Vacating Easements (Case No. 08-39-VAC)
EXHIBIT “B”
Description of Easement to be Vacated
That particular landscaping easement originally dedicated in Document Number 6717492, Office of
the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and now to be vacated, described as follows:
The Southeasterly 10.00 feet of the Northeasterly 64.70 feet of the Southwesterly 104.09 feet of
the following described tract of land:
That part of the Northeast ¼ of the Southeast ¼ of Section 6, Township 28 North, Range
24 West of the 4th Principal Meridian, described as follows: Commencing at a point on the
Southwesterly line of “Minikahda Oaks, Hennepin County, Minnesota” which point is 50
feet Northwesterly at right angles from the center line of Excelsior Avenue also known as
U.S. Trunk Highway #169, thence Southwesterly parallel with the center line of Excelsior
Avenue a distance of 30 feet to the actual point of beginning of the tract to be described,
thence Northwesterly along a line drawn at right angles to said Excelsior Avenue, a distance
of 190 feet; thence Southwesterly parallel with the center line of Excelsior Avenue a distance
of 140 feet; thence Southeasterly along a line drawn at right angles to Excelsior Avenue a
distance of 190 feet to a point 50 feet Northwesterly at right angles from the center line of
said Excelsior Avenue; thence Northeasterly parallel with said center line 140 feet to the
actual point of beginning, according to the United States Government Survey thereof and
situate in Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 4d) Page 6
Subject: Ellipse on Excelsior – Second Reading of Ordinance Vacating Easements (Case No. 08-39-VAC)
EXHIBIT “C”
Description of Easement to be Vacated
That particular landscaping easement originally dedicated in Document Number 6733686, Office of
the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and now to be vacated, described as follows:
The part of the Northwesterly 3.00 feet of the Southeasterly 20.00 feet of Lot 6, Block 5,
Minikahda Oaks, Hennepin County, Minnesota, according to said plat on file and of record in
the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota, which lies Northeasterly of
the following described line:
Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Lot 6; thence Southwesterly, along the
Southeasterly line of said Lot 6, a distance of 20.16 feet to the point of beginning of said line
to be hereinafter described; thence Northwesterly, deflecting right 90 degrees 00 minutes 00
seconds a distance of 30.00 feet and there terminating.
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 4d) Page 7
Subject: Ellipse on Excelsior – Second Reading of Ordinance Vacating Easements (Case No. 08-39-VAC)
EXHIBIT “D”
Description of Easement to be Vacated
That particular drainage and utility easement originally dedicated in Block 5, Minikahda Oaks,
according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and now to be vacated, lying
southerly of the north lines of Lots 3 and 11, said Block.
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 4d) Page 8
Subject: Ellipse on Excelsior – Second Reading of Ordinance Vacating Easements (Case No. 08-39-VAC)
EXHIBIT “E”
Description of Portion of Easement to be Vacated
That part of the Sanitary Sewer easement originally dedicated in Document Numbers 2695611 and
2698090, Office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and now to be vacated,
described as follows:
An easement in and over a tract of land twenty (20) feet in width and situated in the South
One-half of Section Six (6), Township Twenty-Eight (28), Range Twenty-four (24), and
being ten (10) feet on either side of a line described as follows: Commencing on the
northwesterly line of Excelsior Avenue at a point fifty-three and 3/10 (53.3) feet
southwesterly along said Excelsior Avenue from the southwesterly line of Block Five (5),
Minikahda Oaks, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the Office of the
Register of Deeds of said Hennepin County; thence northwesterly at right angles to Excelsior
Avenue to the point of intersection of the center line of Glenhurst Avenue extended south of
said Glenhurst Avenue extended south of said Glenhurst Avenue as laid out in the plat of
Minikahda Oaks (which line extending from Excelsior Avenue to the intersection of the
center line of Glenhurst Avenue is hereinafter referred to as Line A, and the point of said
intersection is hereinafter referred to as Point B); thence deflecting at an angle to the left of
sixty-one degrees fifteen minutes (61º15’) to Line A one hundred twenty-one (121) feet;
thence in a straight line deflecting at an angle to the right of forty-nine degrees fifty-five
minutes (49º55’) to said last described line a distance of sixty-five (65) feet to an existing
manhole which is the termination of existing sanitary sewer constructed to serve premises
know as Minikahda Court.
Over the following described property:
Parcel 1:
Lots 3, 4 and 11, Block 5, in "Minikahda Oaks, Hennepin County, Minnesota".
(Registered property: Certificate of Title No. 666066)
Parcel 2:
Lots 5, 7, 8, 9 and 10, Block 5, in "Minikahda Oaks, Hennepin County, Minnesota"; and
That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 6, Township 28,
Range 24, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at a point on
the southwesterly line of "Minikahda Oaks, Hennepin County, Minnesota" which is distant
50 feet at right angles from the centerline of Excelsior Avenue; thence southwesterly parallel
with said centerline of Excelsior Avenue 30 feet; thence northwesterly at right angles to
Excelsior Avenue 190 feet to a point on the centerline of Greeley Avenue (now Glenhurst
Avenue) extended southerly; thence at an angle of 48 degrees 17 minutes to the right 97 feet
along said extended centerline to the southwesterly line of "Minikahda Oaks, Hennepin
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 4d) Page 9
Subject: Ellipse on Excelsior – Second Reading of Ordinance Vacating Easements (Case No. 08-39-VAC)
County, Minnesota"; thence southeasterly 258.4 feet along last mentioned line, to the
beginning; and
That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 6, Township 28,
Range 24, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at a point on
the southwesterly line of "Minikahda Oaks, Hennepin County, Minnesota" which point is
50 feet northwesterly at right angles from the centerline of Excelsior Avenue also known as
U.S. Trunk highway No. 169; thence southwesterly parallel with the centerline of Excelsior
Avenue a distance of 30 feet to the actual point of beginning of the tract to be described;
thence northwesterly along a line drawn at right angles to said Excelsior Avenue, a distance
of 190 feet; thence southwesterly parallel with the centerline of Excelsior Avenue a distance
of 140 feet; thence southeasterly along a line drawn at right angles to said Excelsior Avenue a
distance of 190 feet to a point 50 feet northwesterly at right angles from the centerline of
said Excelsior Avenue; thence northeasterly parallel with said centerline 140 feet to the actual
point of beginning.
(abstract property)
Parcel 3:
Lot 6, Block 5, in "Minikahda Oaks, Hennepin County, Minnesota".
(abstract property)
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 4d) Page 10
Subject: Ellipse on Excelsior – Second Reading of Ordinance Vacating Easements (Case No. 08-39-VAC)
EXHIBIT “F”
Description of Portion of Easement to be Vacated
That part of the Sanitary Sewer easement originally dedicated in Document Number 2650579,
Office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and now to be vacated, described as
follows:
That part of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of Section Six (6), Township Twenty-eight
(28), Range Twenty-four (24) West of the 4th Principal Meridian described as follows:
Certain strips of land, 10 feet in width, the center lines of which shall be the lines
described as follows: Commencing at a point on the northwesterly line of Excelsior
Avenue, as now laid out and opened a distance of 170 feet southwesterly measured along
said northwesterly line of said Excelsior Avenue from its intersection with the
southwesterly line of Minikahda Oaks; thence northwesterly at right angles to said
northwesterly line of Excelsior Avenue a distance of 300 feet to a point (which last
described line shall be known as Line A, and which point shall be known as Point B);
thence continuing at a deflection angle of 57º to the left from Line A a distance of 90
feet; thence at a deflection angle of 32º to the right from last described course a distance
of 130 feet; thence at a deflection angle of 90º to the left from last described course a
distance of 463 feet; thence at a deflection angle of 65º to the left from last described
course a distance of 160 feet and there terminating.
Also commencing at said Point B and thence at a deflection angle of 115º to the left
from said Line A a distance of 265 feet and there terminating.
Also commencing at said Point B and thence at a deflection angle of 15º to the right
from said Line A a distance of 125 feet and there terminating.
Also the right to enter upon and temporarily pile dirt upon, strips of land five (5) feet in
width parallel with and abutting the above mentioned easement strips on either side
during the progress of any construction or reconstruction of said sewer line; provided
that nothing herein contained shall be construed as to prevent parties of the first part
from placing any buildings or other construction upon all or any part of said abutting
five (5) foot strips, and the rights granted in this paragraph shall terminate as to any
portion of said five (5) foot strips upon which construction shall be placed immediately
upon commencement of said construction.
Over the following described property:
Parcel 1:
Lots 3, 4 and 11, Block 5, in "Minikahda Oaks, Hennepin County, Minnesota".
(Registered property: Certificate of Title No. 666066)
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 4d) Page 11
Subject: Ellipse on Excelsior – Second Reading of Ordinance Vacating Easements (Case No. 08-39-VAC)
Parcel 2:
Lots 5, 7, 8, 9 and 10, Block 5, in "Minikahda Oaks, Hennepin County, Minnesota"; and
That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 6, Township 28,
Range 24, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at a point on
the southwesterly line of "Minikahda Oaks, Hennepin County, Minnesota" which is distant
50 feet at right angles from the centerline of Excelsior Avenue; thence southwesterly parallel
with said centerline of Excelsior Avenue 30 feet; thence northwesterly at right angles to
Excelsior Avenue 190 feet to a point on the centerline of Greeley Avenue (now Glenhurst
Avenue) extended southerly; thence at an angle of 48 degrees 17 minutes to the right 97 feet
along said extended centerline to the southwesterly line of "Minikahda Oaks, Hennepin
County, Minnesota"; thence southeasterly 258.4 feet along last mentioned line, to the
beginning; and
That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 6, Township 28,
Range 24, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at a point on
the southwesterly line of "Minikahda Oaks, Hennepin County, Minnesota" which point is
50 feet northwesterly at right angles from the centerline of Excelsior Avenue also known as
U.S. Trunk highway No. 169; thence southwesterly parallel with the centerline of Excelsior
Avenue a distance of 30 feet to the actual point of beginning of the tract to be described;
thence northwesterly along a line drawn at right angles to said Excelsior Avenue, a distance
of 190 feet; thence southwesterly parallel with the centerline of Excelsior Avenue a distance
of 140 feet; thence southeasterly along a line drawn at right angles to said Excelsior Avenue a
distance of 190 feet to a point 50 feet northwesterly at right angles from the centerline of
said Excelsior Avenue; thence northeasterly parallel with said centerline 140 feet to the actual
point of beginning.
(abstract property)
Parcel 3:
Lot 6, Block 5, in "Minikahda Oaks, Hennepin County, Minnesota".
(abstract property)
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 4d) Page 12
Subject: Ellipse on Excelsior – Second Reading of Ordinance Vacating Easements (Case No. 08-39-VAC)
SUMMARY
ORDINANCE NO.____-09
ORDINANCE VACATING EASEMENTS
3900, 3912 and 3920 Excelsior Boulevard
3409, 3413 and 3417 Glenhurst Avenue South
3408, 3412 and 3416 France Avenue South
This ordinance states that drainage, utility, sanitary sewer, and landscaping easements will be vacated
at the northwest corner of Excelsior Boulevard and France Avenue.
This ordinance shall take effect 15 days after publication.
Adopted by the City Council January 5, 2009
Jeffrey W. Jacobs /s/
Mayor
A copy of the full text of this ordinance is available for inspection with the City Clerk.
Published in St. Louis Park Sailor: January 15, 2009
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 4d) Subject: Ellipse on Excelsior – Second Reading of Ordinance Vacating Easements (Case No. 08-39-VAC)Page 13
Meeting Date: January 5, 2009
Agenda Item #: 4e
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendments Relating to Service Land Use in the Office (O)
Zoning District.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to waive second reading and adopt the ordinance amending the Zoning Ordinance relating
to Service land use in the Office (O) zoning district, and approve the summary ordinance contained
in the agenda materials for publication.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Should the ordinance be amended to allow the Service land use as a permitted use in the Office
zoning district?
BACKGROUND:
An application was received from Kelly Schroeder to amend the zoning ordinance to allow the
“Service” land use as a permitted use in the Office Zoning District. Ms. Schroeder would like to
relocate her business to the Sunset Ridge Business Park, which is zoned Office (O).
This amendment formalizes “Service” uses in the office district. Service uses are common in office
buildings and are consistent with the mixed-use character of office buildings.
Planning Commission Review:
The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on December 3, 2008. No comments were
received from the public, and the Commission recommended approval (7-0).
The Council adopted the first reading on December 15, 2008 (7-0 vote).
PROPOSED AMENDMENT:
The proposed amendments are to:
1. Add “Service” to the list of uses permitted in the Office zoning district; and
2. Add “nail salons” to the definition of service land uses.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 4e) Page 2
Subject: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendments Relating to Service Land Use in the Office (O) Zoning
District
VISION CONSIDERATION:
The proposed amendment is consistent with the community vision. The amendment will strengthen
the Office zoning district by allowing service uses in close proximity to the community’s
employment centers, and encouraging employees and customers of office tenants to walk and bike to
commercial uses.
Attachments: Proposed Ordinance Amendment
Summary Ordinance for Publication
Prepared by: Gary Morrison, Assistant Zoning Administrator
Reviewed by: Meg McMonigal, Planning & Zoning Supervisor
Kevin Locke, Community Development Director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 4e) Page 3
Subject: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendments Relating to Service Land Use in the Office (O) Zoning
District
D R A F T
ORDINANCE NO.09-____
ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ST. LOUIS PARK
ORDINANCE CODE RELATING TO ZONING BY
AMENDING SECTIONS 36-142 AND 36-223
THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK DOES ORDAIN:
Findings
Sec. 1. The City Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning
Commission (Case No. 08-42-ZA).
Sec. 2. The St. Louis Park Ordinance Code, Sections 36-142 and 36-223 are hereby
amended as follows. Section breaks are represented by ***.
Sec. 36-142. Descriptions.
***
(d) Commercial uses. The following are typical of the commercial uses referred to in this
chapter.
***
(30) Service means on-site service provided directly to an individual. This use includes
barbershops, beauty shops, therapeutic massage, nail salon, laundromats, shoe repair
shops, and dry cleaners where articles to be cleaned are picked up and delivered by the
patron. This use excludes pawnshops.
***
Sec. 36-223. O office district.
***
(b) Permitted uses. The following uses are permitted in the O district, if the use complies with the
office restrictions and performance standards of Section 36-222:
(1) Parks and open spaces.
(2) Police and fire stations.
(3) Banks.
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 4e) Page 4
Subject: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendments Relating to Service Land Use in the Office (O) Zoning
District
(4) Business and trade schools.
(5) Printing process facilities.
(6) Studios.
(7) Transit stations.
(8) Service.
Sec. 3. The contents of Planning Case File 08-42-ZA are hereby entered into and made part
of the public hearing record and the record of decision for this case.
Sec. 4. This Ordinance shall take effect fifteen days after its publication.
Public Hearing December 3, 2008
First Reading December 15, 2008
Second Reading January 5, 2009
Date of Publication January 15, 2009
Date Ordinance takes effect January 30, 2009
Adopted by the City Council January 5, 2009
Reviewed for Administration
City Manager Mayor
Attest: Approved as to Form and Execution:
City Clerk City Attorney
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 4e) Page 5
Subject: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendments Relating to Service Land Use in the Office (O) Zoning
District
SUMMARY
ORDINANCE NO.09-____
ORDINANCE RELATING TO SERVICE LAND USE
IN THE OFFICE (O) ZONING DISTRICT
This ordinance updates the Service definition, and allows the Service use as a Permitted Use in the
Office (O) District.
This ordinance shall take effect 15 days after publication.
Adopted by the City Council January 5, 2009
Jeffrey W. Jacobs /s/
Mayor
A copy of the full text of this ordinance is available for inspection with the City Clerk.
Published in St. Louis Park Sailor: January 15, 2009
Meeting Date: January 5, 2009
Agenda Item #: 4f
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Acceptance of Donation from Cisco Systems to City Telephone System Replacement Project.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to Adopt a Resolution Accepting a Donation from Cisco Systems, Inc. in the form of eighty
IP telephones and one gateway.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Does the City Council wish to accept the donation?
BACKGROUND:
State statute requires City Council’s acceptance of donations. This requirement is necessary in order
to make sure the City Council has knowledge of any restrictions placed on the use of each donation
prior to it being expended or used.
Cisco Systems, Inc. is graciously donating to the City of St. Louis Park eighty IP telephones and one
gateway. The donation is given with the restriction that it be used for replacement of the City’s
telephone system in conjunction with Local Government Information Systems (LOGIS), which will
be replacing the telephone system.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
The donation will assist the City of St. Louis Park by reducing capital expenditures necessary for the
telephone system replacement project by $20,900.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
None.
Attachments: Resolution
Prepared by: Clint Pires, Chief Information Officer
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 4f) Page 2
Subject: Acceptance of Cisco Systems Donation to City for Telephone System Replacement Project
RESOLUTION NO. 09-____
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING DONATION
FROM CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. IN THE FORM
OF EIGHTY IP TELEPHONES AND ONE GATEWAY
WHEREAS, Cisco Systems, Inc. has offered to donate to the City of St. Louis Park eighty (80)
IP telephones and one gateway; and
WHEREAS, such donation will benefit the citizens of the City of St. Louis Park;
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes Section 465.03 requires that donations of real or personal
property be accepted by a resolution of the City Council adopted by a two-thirds majority of its
members.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ST. LOUIS PARK AS FOLLOWS:
1. That the donation of eighty (80) IP telephones and one gateway is hereby accepted; and
2. The Mayor and City Manager are authorized to execute any documents which are
necessary to effectuate this transaction.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council January 5, 2009
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Meeting Date: January 5, 2009
Agenda Item #: 4g
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Final Payment Resolution - Contract 105-07 – DMJ Corporation – Project No. 2004-0302.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to adopt Resolution authorizing final payment in the amount of $40,363.72 for the
Minnetonka Boulevard Trail Improvement Project - Project No. 2004-0302 with DMJ
Corporation, Contract No. 105-07.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
BACKGROUND:
A city-wide Sidewalk, Trail, Bikeway and Crossing Plan was developed and adopted on July 5, 2000
as a result of the recommendations from the original Vision St. Louis Park process. The Plan, which
was incorporated into the City’s Comprehensive Plan, identified areas of the City in need of
additional sidewalk, trails or bikeways; and busy roadway or railroad crossings where pedestrian
safety improvements could be made. The Minnetonka Boulevard Trail was the final trail segment to
be constructed as part of the original Plan. The new trail was constructed along the south side of
Minnetonka Boulevard between Highway 169 and Aquila Avenue.
City Council awarded the project to DMJ Corporation on August 13, 2007 in the amount of
$237,960.15. The Contractor completed this work within the contract time allowed at a final
contract cost of $266,826.15. Change Order No. 1 amounted to $28,866.00 for extra utility work
and construction of a stormwater detention pond.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
The CIP budgeted $250,000 for this project from the 2005 General Obligation bond proceeds
along with $79,000 in Hennepin County Funds.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
Attachment: Resolution
Prepared by: Jim Olson, Engineering Project Manager
Reviewed by: Mike Rardin, Public Works Director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 4g) Page 2
Subject: Final Payment Resolution Contract 105-07 DMJ Corp
RESOLUTION NO. 09-___
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK ON
MINNETONKA BOULEVARD TRAIL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
CITY PROJECT NO. 2004-0302
CONTRACT NO. 105-07
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. Pursuant to a written contract with the City dated August 20, 2007, DMJ Corporation has
satisfactorily completed the construction of the Minnetonka Boulevard Trail Improvement project, as
per Contract No. 105-07.
2. The Director of Public Works has filed his recommendations for final acceptance of the work.
3. The work completed under this contract is accepted and approved. The City Manager is directed to
make final payment on the contract, taking the contractor's receipt in full.
Original Contract Price $237,960.15
Change Order $28,866.00
Underrun 5,891.15
Previous Payments $220,571.28
Balance Due $40,363.72
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council January 5, 2009
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Meeting Date: January 5, 2009
Agenda Item #: 4h
OFFICIAL MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
December 3, 2008--8:00 p.m.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MEMBERS PRESENT: Lynne Carper, Robert Kramer, Claudia Johnston-Madison, Dennis
Morris, Richard Person, Carl Robertson, Larry Shapiro
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: Kevin Locke, Meg McMonigal, Gary Morrison
OTHERS PRESENT: Tom Scott, City Attorney
Garrett Lysiak, Consulting Engineer
1. Call to Order – Roll Call
2. Approval of Minutes of November 19, 2008
Chair Robertson asked that paragraph two from public hearing 3A. be deleted.
Commissioner Morris moved approval of the minutes as corrected. Richard Person
seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 7-0.
3. Hearings
A. To be continued to December 17, 2008
Location: 2501 Highway 100 South
Applicant: Benilde-St. Margaret’s School
Case Nos.: 08-45-SP, 08-43-CUP, 08-44-CUP
Major Amendment to a Special Permit for the reconstruction of athletic facilities
Conditional Use Permit for excavation of over 400 cubic yards of material
Conditional Use Permit for modifications to the floodplain
B. Proposed amendment to Zoning Ordinance allowing Services Uses in Office
Districts
Applicant: Kelly Schroeder
Case No.: 08-42-ZA
Gary Morrison, Assistant Zoning Administrator, presented the staff report.
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 4h) Page 2
Subject: Planning Commission Minutes December 3, 2008
Commissioner Morris asked about defining personal service uses. He said the
proposed definition was too broad.
Mr. Morrison agreed that the definition is broad. He explained it is similar to many
other definitions in the zoning ordinance in that it briefly explains what the land use
is and then provides some examples to help guide in interpretation.
Chair Robertson suggested changing the language to “this use includes but is not
limited to ….”
Chair Robertson opened the public hearing. As no one was present wishing to speak,
the Chair closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Kramer made a motion approving the proposed Zoning Ordinance
amendments to allow Service as a land use in the Office (O) zoning district, and to
update the “Service” land use definition with revision as noted. Commissioner
Johnston-Madison seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 7-0.
4. Other Business
A. Proposed amendments to Zoning Ordinance relating to
communication towers and antennas
Applicant: City of St. Louis Park
Case No.: 08-23-ZA
Chair Robertson stated that the Planning Commission had just finished a study
session on the proposed amendments prior to the Commission’s regular meeting.
Mr. Morrison presented a summary of the proposed ordinance. He discussed several
performance standards including interference, height, setbacks, aesthetics, co-
locating, lighting, wetlands and floodplains.
Chair Robertson said in its study session, the Commission strongly recommended
not prohibiting communication towers and antennas from being located in wetlands
and floodplains. He said he assumed that recommendation would be part of
whatever moves forward to the City Council. He noted that the public hearing was
closed at the November 19th meeting.
Commissioner Kramer said he is in favor of the proposed ordinance except regarding
the need for a variance for a request for a 400 foot antenna on property currently
owned and operated by an applicant. He asked if such a variance would be
reasonably granted.
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 4h) Page 3
Subject: Planning Commission Minutes December 3, 2008
Mr. Morrison said that would be difficult to answer as every site is separate and staff
has not evaluated any particular site in that manner.
Commissioner Kramer said although the ordinance is well written and has required a
lot of work, he would vote against it because he sees one particular use that wouldn’t
work and he would object on that reason alone.
Commissioner Morris asked about accommodation for expansion.
Mr. Morrison responded the City was trying to prioritize co-locating to minimize the
number of towers.
Commissioner Morris spoke about the collapse rate. He said he doesn’t see any
reason to increase 1 ½ times to 2 times. He stated there isn’t any data to support
this.
Mr. Morrison responded that the collapse rate remains at 1.5, the setback from
property lines. Twice the height from residential properties is primarily an aesthetic
setback.
Commissioner Morris said that 50 feet back really isn’t much of an aesthetic change.
He said he would support the ordinance to go forward with the usual understanding
that the Commission is a recommending body. The City Council will review
comments, minutes, and discussion and arrive at their own decision.
Chair Robertson said he has an issue with the language that any new communication
tower must be designed to permit additional antennas.
Meg McMonigal, Planning and Zoning Supervisor, read the proposed language
which states “any communication tower exceeding 50 feet in height shall permit the
reasonable joint use of the structure for other antennas.” She said if the applicant
proves that it is not viable, that would be acceptable.
Commissioner Johnston-Madison stated she would vote to recommend the proposed
amendments. She would like to see the wetlands restriction be reevaluated and
would recommend to Council that the restriction be removed. She said she
approves of the language regarding co-location.
Commissioner Carper said the ordinance has greatly improved and he thanked staff
for the changes. He said he will support it.
Chair Robertson commented for the record that during the study session there were
many comments and minor adjustments about different heights. He expects staff
will look at those items, as well as recommendations to simplify some things, and a
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 4h) Page 4
Subject: Planning Commission Minutes December 3, 2008
couple of different strategies, just one more time before going to the City Council.
He stated that he wholeheartedly supports these changes in their intent.
Commissioner Person said he supported Commissioner Johnston-Madison’s
suggestion that the prohibition regarding wetlands be removed. He supports the
ordinance.
Commissioner Person made a motion to recommend approval of the proposed
zoning ordinance amendments related to communication towers and antennas, with
a recommendation to delete the wetland/floodplains prohibition from the proposed
language. Commissioner Shapiro seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a
vote of 6-1 (Kramer voting opposed).
B. Benilde-St. Margaret’s School Reconstruction of Athletic Facilities
Ms. McMonigal reviewed the process and preliminary plans for the December 17,
2008 public hearing.
5. Communications
6. Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 8:30 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Nancy Sells
Administrative Secretary
Meeting Date: January 5, 2009
Agenda Item #: 4i
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Vendor Claims.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to Accept for filing Vendor Claims for the period December 13, 2008 through January 2,
2009.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
BACKGROUND:
The Finance Department prepares this report on a monthly basis for Council’s review.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
None.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
Attachments: Vendor Claims
Prepared by: Connie Neubeck, Account Clerk
12/30/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:45:00R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
1Page -Council Check Summary
01/02/2009 -12/13/2008
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
38.78GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT PARTSA-1 OUTDOOR POWER INC
38.78
2,006.36EQUIPMENT REPLACE G&A MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENTAAA-LICENSE DIVISION
2,006.36
372.00HOLIDAY PROGRAMS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESABRAKADOODLE
372.00
370.00WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESACZ LABORATORIES INC
370.00
125.00REILLY G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESAECOM INC
1,274.00SAMPLINGGENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
4,349.75STUDIESGENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
5,748.75
104.19-PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH DUE TO OTHER GOVTSALL STAR CARTS & VEHICLES INC
1,707.14ORGANIZED REC G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
1,602.95
212.20INSPECTIONS G & A BUILDINGAMERICAN BUILDING CONTRACTORS
212.20
1,193.52GENERAL REPAIR TIRESAMERICAN TIRE DISTRIBUTORS
1,193.52
13.72-WATER UTILITY BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTSAMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOC
224.72WATER UTILITY G&A TRAINING
211.00
115.72GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE OPERATIONAL SUPPLIESAMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SER
206.55PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
152.01PARK MAINTENANCE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
143.88ENTERPRISE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
109.42VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
109.63WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
109.63SEWER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
946.84
753.70PRINTING/REPRO SERVICES OFFICE SUPPLIESANCHOR PAPER CO
753.70
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 4i)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 2
12/30/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:45:00R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
2Page -Council Check Summary
01/02/2009 -12/13/2008
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
232.05OPERATIONSRADIO COMMUNICATIONSANCOM COMMUNICATIONS INC
232.05
744.65DAMAGE REPAIR OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESANDERSEN INC, EARL
294.68SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
1,039.33
290.00ADMINISTRATION G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSAPA
290.00
3,388.01GENERAL CUSTODIAL DUTIES CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SUPPLYAPACHE GROUP OF MINNESOTA
3,388.01
92.00COMMUNICATIONS/GV REIMBURSEABL SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSAPCO INT
92.00
189.10GENERAL CUSTODIAL DUTIES CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SUPPLYARAMARK UNIFORM CORP ACCTS
194.60ENTERPRISE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
383.70
178.60INSPECTIONS G & A BUILDINGASI CONTRACTING
178.60
215.13EQUIPMENT REPLACE G&A MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENTASPEN EQUIPMENT CO
215.13
480.50OPERATIONSOPERATIONAL SUPPLIESASPEN MILLS
480.50
275.00INSPECTIONS G & A LICENSESASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA COUNT
275.00
31.49COMMUNICATIONS/GV REIMBURSEABL TELEPHONEAT&T
31.49
478.50WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEAUTOMATIC SYSTEMS INC
478.50
850.50EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A TUITIONBARNES, PAUL
850.50
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 4i)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 3
12/30/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:45:00R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
3Page -Council Check Summary
01/02/2009 -12/13/2008
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
57.50OPERATIONSSMALL TOOLSBATTERIES PLUS
57.50
17,044.00WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEBERGERSON CASWELL INC
17,044.00
225.00MOVE-UP PROGRAM SERVICES/MRKTG OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESBERGFORD ARCHITECTURE, JOHN
225.00
74.00SOLID WASTE G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSBIOCYCLE
74.00
20.00INSPECTIONS G & A LICENSESBLOM, DEAN
20.00
4,992.98WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESBLOOMINGTON, CITY OF
4,992.98
1,695.73DAMAGE REPAIR OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESBOHN WELDING INC
532.50GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
2,228.23
135.79WINTER RINKS GENERAL SUPPLIESBRENTS SIGNS AND DISPLAYS
135.79
3,083.20EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A TUITIONBRINK, SCOTT
3,083.20
218.21ASSESSING G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CARBULTEMA, CORY
218.21
17.12-GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTSCARDIAC SCIENCE INC
280.52OPERATIONSOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
263.40
5,018.85CITY HALL BUILDING MTCE SERVICECARLSON & SON'S, J
5,018.85
368.82DESKTOP SUPPORT/SERVICES EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICECARTRIDGE CARE
368.82
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 4i)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 4
12/30/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:45:00R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
4Page -Council Check Summary
01/02/2009 -12/13/2008
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
5,079.64INSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESCARVER, CITY OF
5,079.64
20,088.59DISCOUNT LOAN PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESCENTER ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT
2,260.00MOVE-UP PROGRAM SERVICES/MRKTG OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
102,056.00TRANSFORMATION LOAN OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
124,404.59
2,531.78FACILITY OPERATIONS HEATING GASCENTERPOINT ENERGY
1,141.91PARK MAINTENANCE G & A HEATING GAS
126.72WESTWOOD G & A HEATING GAS
197.20NATURALIST PROGRAMMER HEATING GAS
5,541.40WATER UTILITY G&A HEATING GAS
135.11REILLY G & A HEATING GAS
426.32SEWER UTILITY G&A HEATING GAS
10,100.44
8,503.81FACILITY OPERATIONS HEATING GASCENTERPOINT ENERGY SERVICES IN
8,913.38ENTERPRISE G & A HEATING GAS
17,417.19
41.53WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIESCINTAS FIRST AID & SAFETY
41.53
.20-GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTSCITIZENS INDEPENDENT BANK
535.00ADMINISTRATION G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
192.87ADMINISTRATION G & A MEETING EXPENSE
263.07ADMINISTRATION G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR
41.22HUMAN RESOURCES ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
28.99HUMAN RESOURCES CITE
60.07NETWORK SUPPORT SERVICES DATACOMMUNICATIONS
590.00ASSESSING G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
30.00FINANCE G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
256.77POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
371.00POLICE G & A REPAIRS
3,601.87Justice Assistance Grant -2005 SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
234.37OPERATIONSGENERAL SUPPLIES
127.21OPERATIONSOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
177.13OPERATIONSTRAINING
32.32BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
267.24CABLE TV G & A OFFICE EQUIPMENT
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 4i)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 5
12/30/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:45:00R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
5Page -Council Check Summary
01/02/2009 -12/13/2008
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
11.10TV PRODUCTION GENERAL SUPPLIES
32.06SENIOR VIDEO CLUB OFFICE EQUIPMENT
6,852.09
2,500.00COMM & MARKETING G & A PRINTING & PUBLISHINGCITY IMAGE COMMUNICATIONS
2,500.00
1,466.03CONCESSIONSCONCESSION SUPPLIESCOCA-COLA BOTTLING CO
1,466.03
160.50VOICE SYSTEM MTCE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICECOLLINS COMMUNICATIONS
315.75BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
476.25
100.00ENGINEERING G & A TRAININGCOMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION
230.75CE SURVEYS IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
414.90CE INSPECTION IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
186.49CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
932.14
3,353.40EMERGENCY REPAIR GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP S
3,353.40
49,907.07ROUTINE MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESCONCRETE IDEA INC
24,196.02CONSTRUCTION PAYMENTS IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
5,410.25CONSTRUCTION PAYMENTS IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
79,513.34
6,630.00POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESCORNERHOUSE
6,630.00
40.30-GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTSCPP INC
660.30HUMAN RESOURCES ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
620.00
2,344.88GENERAL CUSTODIAL DUTIES CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SUPPLYDALCO ENTERPRISES INC
2,344.88
80.50FINANCE G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTATDEJONG, BRUCE
80.50
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 4i)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 6
12/30/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:45:00R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
6Page -Council Check Summary
01/02/2009 -12/13/2008
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
764.34POLICE G & A RENTAL EQUIPMENTDELAGE LANDEN FINANCIAL SERVIC
764.34
888.30OPERATIONSOPERATIONAL SUPPLIESDELTA MEDICAL SUPPLY GROUP INC
888.30
80.00INSPECTIONS G & A LICENSESDEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY
80.00
212.25ENTERPRISE G & A ADVERTISINGDEX MEDIA EAST LLC
212.25
122.30GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT PARTSDIESEL COMPONENTS
122.30
2,296.84PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESDJ ELECTRIC SERVICES INC
2,853.00PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
5,149.84
65.13PRINTING/REPRO SERVICES PRINTING & PUBLISHINGDO-GOOD.BIZ INC
1,345.86POSTAL SERVICES POSTAGE
1,410.99
451.95CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDIDOUBLETREE PARK PLACE HOTEL
451.95
500.00BASKETBALLPROGRAM REVENUEDRESCH, JEREMY
500.00
25.74SEWER UTILITY G&A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAREDDIHI, ISMAIL
25.74
2,006.00DAMAGE REPAIR OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESEGAN COMPANIES INC
2,520.00INSTALLATIONOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
4,526.00
1,896.25ESCROWSEHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC
1,896.25
29.37ADMINISTRATION G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESELECTION SYSTEMS & SOFTWARE IN
29.37
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 4i)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 7
12/30/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:45:00R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
7Page -Council Check Summary
01/02/2009 -12/13/2008
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
7,023.75OFFICE EQUIPMENT OFFICE FURNITURE & EQUIPMENTELERT & ASSOCIATES
7,023.75
376.22INSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY
376.22
91.94GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT PARTSEMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOG
91.94
135.25OPERATIONSOPERATIONAL SUPPLIESEMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS
135.25
38,131.10CONSTRUCTION PAYMENTS IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDIENCOMM MIDWEST
38,131.10
1,235.00COMM & MARKETING G & A PRINTING & PUBLISHINGEVANS-STARK DESIGN
1,235.00
63.28PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT PARTSFACTORY MOTOR PARTS CO
31.89GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES
590.34GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT PARTS
685.51
99.32BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICEFAIRMONT FIRE SYSTEMS INC
99.32
58.50ASSESSING G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CARFECHNER, MARTY
58.50
700.78ICE RESURFACER MOTOR FUELSFERRELLGAS
700.78
4,890.78OPERATIONSGENERAL SUPPLIESFIRE EQUIPMENT SPECIALTIES INC
4,890.78
4,771.00OPERATIONSOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESFIRE PROTECTION SERVICES INC
4,771.00
234.09GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT PARTSFORCE AMERICA INC
234.09
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 4i)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 8
12/30/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:45:00R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
8Page -Council Check Summary
01/02/2009 -12/13/2008
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
21.82-GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTSFORMS & SYSTEMS OF MINNESOTA
346.98POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
10.60POLICE G & A POSTAGE
335.76
273.24PRINTING/REPRO SERVICES PRINTING & PUBLISHINGG S DIRECT
273.24
3,177.57GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT PARTSGENERAL REPAIR SERVICE
3,177.57
1.87-PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH DUE TO OTHER GOVTSGENESIS INC
30.57WINTERGENERAL SUPPLIES
28.70
195.00INSPECTIONS G & A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCEGIRTZ CONTRACTING
195.00
548.80WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICEGOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC
548.80
287.16HUMAN RESOURCES MILEAGE-PERSONAL CARGOTHBERG, BRIDGET
287.16
133.65GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESGRAINGER INC, WW
229.95BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES
299.66WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER
663.26
600.00APPLICATION SUPPORT/SERVICE COMPUTER SERVICESGREEN, HOWARD R COMPANY
600.00
39.08WESTWOOD G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CARGRIMSRUD, TOM
39.08
88.00INSPECTIONS G & A BUILDINGGRUSSING ROOFING INC
88.00
11,541.43TREE DISEASE PUBLIC CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICEHAINES TREE SERVICE, B J
11,541.43
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 4i)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 9
12/30/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:45:00R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
9Page -Council Check Summary
01/02/2009 -12/13/2008
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
159.92INSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESHARENS, BRUCE
159.92
401.17GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESHARMON INC
401.17
9,235.61WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIESHAWKINS INC
9,235.61
118.15WATER UTILITY G&A SMALL TOOLSHD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD
118.15
140.00SUPERVISORYSUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSHENNEPIN COUNTY CHIEFS POLICE
140.00
364.34NETWORK SUPPORT SERVICES COMPUTER SERVICESHENNEPIN COUNTY INFO TECH
1,000.00ASSESSING G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1,689.76POLICE G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
930.68OPERATIONSRADIO COMMUNICATIONS
315.16OPERATIONSEMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
4,299.94
1,384.86POLICE G & A SUBSISTENCE SERVICEHENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF
1,384.86
199.75WATER UTILITY G&A TRAININGHIGHWAY TECHNOLOGIES INC
199.75
465.69INSPECTIONS G & A TRAININGHOFFMAN, BRIAN
465.69
984.00GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET CLEARING ACCOUNTHOIGAARDS
984.00
2,000.00ESCROWSPMC ESCROWHOLMES, MIKE
2,000.00
7.89SANDING/SALTING GENERAL SUPPLIESHOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
38.81PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
55.25PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
34.68SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 4i)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 10
12/30/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:45:00R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
10Page -Council Check Summary
01/02/2009 -12/13/2008
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
172.80WATER UTILITY G&A SMALL TOOLS
211.18WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER
16.85WATER UTILITY G&A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE
23.28SEWER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES
13.89SEWER UTILITY G&A SMALL TOOLS
574.63
169.06ASSESSING G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CARHOPPE, MARK
169.06
227.44TREE INJECTION PUBLIC CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICEHUZEL, CANDACE
227.44
1,520.40EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S UNION DUESI.U.O.E. LOCAL NO 49
1,520.40
2,887.00INSPECTIONS G & A TRAININGICC
2,887.00
819.45SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS
819.45
1,154.95CABLE TV G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESIMPLEX.NET INC
19.93CABLE TV G & A BANK CHARGES/CREDIT CD FEES
1,174.88
151.40FINANCE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIESIMPRINT GALLERY INC
151.40
47.51SANDING/SALTING EQUIPMENT PARTSINDELCO
47.51
7.16-PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH DUE TO OTHER GOVTSINDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO INC
117.30GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES
110.14
400.00CITY HALL GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESINSPEC INC
400.00
22.58GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT PARTSINVER GROVE FORD
22.58
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 4i)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 11
12/30/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:45:00R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
11Page -Council Check Summary
01/02/2009 -12/13/2008
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
25.00HUMAN RESOURCES SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSIPMA - MINNESOTA CHAPTER ADMIN
25.00
25.00HUMAN RESOURCES SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSIPMA-HR
25.00
55.82WATER UTILITY G&A BUILDING MTCE SERVICEJ & F REDDY RENTS
55.82
43,899.33CONSTRUCTION PAYMENTS IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDIJEDLICKI INC, G F
43,899.33
300.00WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICEJM CONSULTING LTD
300.00
330.00BASKETBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESJOHNSON, SHAWN
330.00
6,200.002008A UTIL REV BOND PROJECT BOND ISSUE COSTSKENNEDY & GRAVEN
6,200.00
10.00SPECIAL PROGRAMS PROGRAM REVENUEKOTTKE, KATHRYN
10.00
76,324.42CONSTRUCTION PAYMENTS IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDIKRAEMER & SONS INC, EDWARD
76,324.42
61.48INSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESKUBE, CLARK
26.00INSPECTIONS G & A TRAINING
87.48
49.66PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESLAKES GAS CO
49.66
22.82GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT PARTSLAND CARE EQUIPMENT CO
22.82
72.00GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT PARTSLANO EQUIPMENT INC
72.00
195.00INSPECTIONS G & A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCELARSON, ANGELA
195.00
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 4i)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 12
12/30/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:45:00R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
12Page -Council Check Summary
01/02/2009 -12/13/2008
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
749.20RELAMPINGOTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESLARSON, JH CO
36.45PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
1,676.92BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES
939.04WATER UTILITY G&A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE
3,401.61
2,381.82EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S UNION DUESLAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES
2,381.82
40.00ADMINISTRATION G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTATLEAGUE OF MN CITIES
40.00
96,491.25EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A League of MN Cities dept'l expLEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST
96,491.25
26,005.32UNINSURED LOSS G&A UNINSURED LOSSLEAGUE OF MN CITIES INSURANCE
26,005.32
200.00ANIMAL CONTROL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESLEROY JOB TRUCKING
200.00
72.00ADMINISTRATION G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESLEWIS, MIKIALIA
72.00
1,539.36POLICE G & A OFFICE EQUIPMENTLOFFLER COMPANIES
1,539.36
1,435.53BOILER MTCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICELOUIS DEGIDIO SERVICES
1,435.53
6,091.80PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESLSV METALS INC
6,091.80
180.00VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICELUBRICATION TECHNOLOGIES INC
180.00
50.00SUPERVISORYSUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSMACIA
50.00
1,047.65GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT PARTSMACQUEEN EQUIP CO
1,047.65
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 4i)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 13
12/30/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:45:00R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
13Page -Council Check Summary
01/02/2009 -12/13/2008
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
234.00COMM & MARKETING G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSMAGC
234.00
332.90WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEMANAGED SERVICES INC
332.90
2,778.34PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESMANKATO KASOTA STONE INC
2,778.34
5.06DAMAGE REPAIR OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESMCCOY, WILLIAM PETROLEUM FUELS
5.06
450.00MOVE-UP PROGRAM SERVICES/MRKTG OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESMCMONIGAL ARCHITECTS LLC
450.00
126.97ORGANIZED REC G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESMENARDS
17.48PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
58.35WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
202.80
250.00POLICE G & A FORFEITURES/PENALTIESMESTROVIC, MARKO
250.00
60.66NETWORK SUPPORT SERVICES TELEPHONEMETROCALL INC
60.66
285,423.79OPERATIONSCLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICEMETROPOLITAN COUNCIL
285,423.79
38.42SUPPORT SERVICES OFFICE SUPPLIESMICRO CENTER
160.34WATER UTILITY G&A OFFICE EQUIPMENT
198.76
80.55POLICE G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESMID AMERICA BUSINESS SYSTEMS
80.55
12,793.59WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESMIDWEST ASPHALT CORP
12,793.59
13,307.25VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A MOTOR FUELSMIDWEST FUELS INVER GROVE HEIG
13,307.25
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 4i)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 14
12/30/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:45:00R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
14Page -Council Check Summary
01/02/2009 -12/13/2008
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
496.72HOLIDAY PROGRAMS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESMIDWEST VENDING INC
496.72
43,846.05INSTALLATIONOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESMILLERBERND MFG CO
43,846.05
307.94NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESMINIKAHDA OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD AS
307.94
741.74EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S WAGE GARNISHMENTSMINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PYT CT
741.74
3.74-GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTSMINNESOTA COUNTY ATTORNEYS ASS
53.25POLICE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
7.99POLICE G & A POSTAGE
57.50
21,541.00WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESMINNESOTA DEPT HEALTH
21,541.00
144.00PARK MAINTENANCE G & A TRAININGMINNESOTA GREEN EXPO
60.00VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
204.00
24,907.00CITYWIDE SF INSPECT REHAB PRGM GRANTS - STATEMINNESOTA HOUSING
24,907.00
630.00POLICE G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTATMINNESOTA JUVENILE OFFICERS
630.00
128.00INSPECTIONS G & A LICENSESMINNESOTA MULTI-HOUSING ASSOC
128.00
280.00PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A TRAININGMINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AG
280.00
185.00OPERATIONSTRAININGMINNESOTA STATE FIRE CHIEFS AS
185.00
50.00EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A UNEMPLOYMENTMINNESOTA UI FUND
50.00
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 4i)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 15
12/30/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:45:00R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
15Page -Council Check Summary
01/02/2009 -12/13/2008
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
106.40PRINTING/REPRO SERVICES OFFICE SUPPLIESMINUTEMAN PRESS
106.40
350.09OPERATIONSOPERATIONAL SUPPLIESMOORE MEDICAL LLC
350.09
3,025.00HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESMORRISON & ASSOCIATES INC
3,025.00
202.49GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET CLEARING ACCOUNTMORTGAGE SERVICES
202.49
100.00BASKETBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESMOSE, WILLIAM
100.00
100.00HUMAN RESOURCES TRAININGMPELRA
100.00
105.00PARK MAINTENANCE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSMPSA
35.00ENVIRONMENTAL G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
140.00
120.00ORGANIZED REC G & A TRAININGMRPA
120.00
4.58GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT PARTSMTI DISTRIBUTING CO
4.58
124.19GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIESMYERS TIRE SUPPLY CO
124.19
95.00INSPECTIONS G & A LICENSESN E H A
95.00
53.14OPERATIONSGENERAL SUPPLIESNAPA (GENUINE PARTS CO)
26.40SANDING/SALTING EQUIPMENT PARTS
15.64PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
7.44PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT PARTS
166.72GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES
1,105.89GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT PARTS
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 4i)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 16
12/30/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:45:00R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
16Page -Council Check Summary
01/02/2009 -12/13/2008
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
17.56EQUIPMENT REPLACE G&A MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENT
1,392.79
78.10ADMINISTRATION G & A TELEPHONENEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
163.47HUMAN RESOURCES TELEPHONE
338.05RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT TELEPHONE
71.10ASSESSING G & A TELEPHONE
122.03FINANCE G & A TELEPHONE
253.59EDA / HA REIMBURSEMENT TELEPHONE
1,216.24POLICE G & A TELEPHONE
441.10OPERATIONSTELEPHONE
71.31INSPECTIONS G & A TELEPHONE
242.23ENGINEERING G & A TELEPHONE
421.98PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A TELEPHONE
88.71PARK AND REC G&A TELEPHONE
339.17ORGANIZED REC G & A TELEPHONE
270.65PARK MAINTENANCE G & A TELEPHONE
71.10ENVIRONMENTAL G & A TELEPHONE
279.96WESTWOOD G & A TELEPHONE
50.82REC CENTER/AQUATIC PARK SAL TELEPHONE
133.09VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A TELEPHONE
367.54WATER UTILITY G&A TELEPHONE
131.94SEWER UTILITY G&A TELEPHONE
37.36SOLID WASTE G&A TELEPHONE
5,189.54
225.00MOVE-UP PROGRAM SERVICES/MRKTG OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESNGUYEN ARCHITECTS
225.00
2,016.64WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESNORTHERN WATER WORKS SUPPLY
2,016.64
68.03GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT PARTSNUSS TRUCK & EQUIPMENT
68.03
149.76STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESO'CONNOR, CHARLES
149.76
5.00YOUTH PROGRAMS PROGRAM REVENUEO'DONNELL, SHEILA
5.00
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 4i)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 17
12/30/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:45:00R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
17Page -Council Check Summary
01/02/2009 -12/13/2008
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
185.52ENGINEERING G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEOCE
185.52
66,215.00CONSTRUCTION PAYMENTS IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDIODLAND PROTECTIVE COATINGS INC
66,215.00
231.45ADMINISTRATION G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESOFFICE DEPOT
412.14HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICE SUPPLIES
86.68IT G & A OFFICE EQUIPMENT
287.44DESKTOP SUPPORT/SERVICES OFFICE EQUIPMENT
155.18ASSESSING G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
34.82FINANCE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
103.22GENERAL INFORMATION OFFICE SUPPLIES
143.48POLICE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
245.17INSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
85.24ORGANIZED REC G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
14.37HOUSING REHAB G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
105.57SEWER UTILITY G&A OFFICE SUPPLIES
1,904.76
131.85NETWORK SUPPORT SERVICES DATACOMMUNICATIONSOFFICE OF ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOG
62.86VOICE SYSTEM MTCE TELEPHONE
4,136.60FACILITY OPERATIONS TELEPHONE
99.68NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH TELEPHONE
747.58COMMUNICATIONS/GV REIMBURSEABL TELEPHONE
5,178.57
240.00POLICE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSOFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STA
40.00PUBLIC WORKS G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
280.00
2,530.00INSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESOFFICE TEAM
2,530.00
50.88DAMAGE REPAIR SMALL TOOLSOLSEN CHAIN & CABLE CO INC
10.65GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT PARTS
61.53
106.50PORTABLE TOILETS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESON SITE SANITATION
106.50
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 4i)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 18
12/30/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:45:00R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
18Page -Council Check Summary
01/02/2009 -12/13/2008
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
5,000.00ESCROWSPMC ESCROWOSTERHOLT, CASEY & NICOLE
5,000.00
1,650.00GENERAL INFORMATION GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESOWL ENGINEERING & EMC TEST LAB
1,650.00
50.00GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET CLEARING ACCOUNTPARK NICOLLET CLINIC
100.00HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
237.00HUMAN RESOURCES RECRUITMENT
160.00TRAININGGENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
81.00ERUGENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
128.00ENGINEERING G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
498.00TRAININGGENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
128.00TRAININGGENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
452.00WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
288.00TRAININGGENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
2,122.00
4,359.58INSPECTIONS G & A ELECTRICALPARSONS ELECTRIC
4,359.58
153.70GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT PARTSPARTS PLUS
153.70
200.00COMM & MARKETING G & A PRINTING & PUBLISHINGPERNSTEINER CREATIVE GROUP INC
200.00
6.00ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL SERVICESPETTY CASH
32.76ADMINISTRATION G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR
37.87HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL SUPPLIES
52.63FINANCE G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR
47.99INSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
13.00INSPECTIONS G & A TRAINING
13.00INSPECTIONS G & A MEETING EXPENSE
12.99TRAININGMEETING EXPENSE
11.75WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES
3.49WATER UTILITY G&A BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES
18.70WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
250.18
15.12POSTAL SERVICES POSTAGEPETTY CASH - WWNC
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 4i)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 19
12/30/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:45:00R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
19Page -Council Check Summary
01/02/2009 -12/13/2008
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
35.64WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
2.14FALLGENERAL SUPPLIES
7.49SCHOOL GROUPS GENERAL SUPPLIES
60.39
2,544.52WATER UTILITY G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDIPLANT & FLANGED EQUIPMENT
2,544.52
402.95GENERAL REPAIR TIRESPOMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC
402.95
251.80WATER UTILITY G&A POSTAGEPOSTMASTER - PERMIT #603
251.81SEWER UTILITY G&A POSTAGE
251.81SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS POSTAGE
251.80STORM WATER UTILITY G&A POSTAGE
1,007.22
8.42GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT PARTSPRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN
8.42
349.00STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICEPRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC
349.00
105.00OPERATIONSEQUIPMENT PARTSPRECISION REPAIR & CALIBRATION
105.00
144.00ICE RESURFACER EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEPRINTERS SERVICE INC
144.00
506.48WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESPROGRESSIVE CONSULTING ENGINEE
1,745.00PE DESIGN IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
2,251.48
27.83-PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH DUE TO OTHER GOVTSPROPET DISTRIBUTORS INC
456.03PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
428.20
366.67EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S PERAPUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT AS
366.67
121.67BLDG/GROUNDS OPS & MAINT BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIESPUMP & METER SERVICE
121.67
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 4i)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 20
12/30/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:45:00R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
20Page -Council Check Summary
01/02/2009 -12/13/2008
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
13,802.44WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICEQUALITY RESTORATION SERVICES I
13,802.44
37.18VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A POSTAGEQUICKSILVER EXPRESS COURIER
37.18
110.82COP SHOP TELEPHONEQWEST
1,400.07COMMUNICATIONS/GV REIMBURSEABL TELEPHONE
18.18E-911 PROGRAM TELEPHONE
1,529.07
124.80INSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESRILEY, BERNARD
124.80
10,987.52WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESRMR SERVICES
10,987.52
41.40YOUTH PROGRAMS PROGRAM REVENUERUHLAND, MAUREEN
41.40
448.47ORGANIZED REC G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESSAM'S CLUB
43.23ORGANIZED REC G & A INTEREST/FINANCE CHARGES
12.28SPECIAL EVENTS GENERAL SUPPLIES
42.73WARMING HOUSE GENERAL SUPPLIES
546.71
38.74WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERSSAND, KENNETH & PAULA
38.74
187.49GENERAL INFORMATION GENERAL SUPPLIESSCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO.
187.49
45.88WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERSSCHOLTEC, DALE
45.88
308.00STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESSEH
308.00
160.00WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICESENUS METERING SYSTEMS
160.00
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 4i)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 21
12/30/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:45:00R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
21Page -Council Check Summary
01/02/2009 -12/13/2008
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
528.09GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICESIMPLEXGRINNELL LP
528.09
1,318.01EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S UNION DUESSLP ASSOC OF FIREFIGHTERS #993
1,318.01
2,172.47DESKTOP SUPPORT/SERVICES DATACOMMUNICATIONSSPRINT
2,172.47
208.50ORGANIZED REC G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESSPS COMPANIES INC
71.60PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
66.87WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES
346.97
171.40PE INVEST/REVIEW/PER IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDISRF CONSULTING GROUP INC
1,827.47PE DESIGN IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
38,645.35PE PLANS/SPECS IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
31,350.82CE DESIGN IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
71,995.04
1,488.00COMM & MARKETING G & A PRINTING & PUBLISHINGSTAR TRIBUNE
1,488.00
195.00WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESSTILLWATER PLUMBING LLP
195.00
107.54SEWER UTILITY G&A SMALL TOOLSSTREICHER'S
212.99EQUIPMENT REPLACE G&A MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENT
320.53
178.28GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT PARTSSUBURBAN CHEVROLET
178.28
4,968.40REILLY BUDGET GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESSUMMIT ENVIROSOLUTIONS INC
4,968.40
250.00PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICESUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION
250.00
160.89ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL NOTICESSUN NEWSPAPERS
160.89
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 4i)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 22
12/30/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:45:00R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
22Page -Council Check Summary
01/02/2009 -12/13/2008
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
35.16POLICE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIESTARGET BANK
7.38POLICE G & A TRAINING
42.54
131.58ADMINISTRATION G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESTELELANGUAGE INC
131.58
15.89GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIESTERMINAL SUPPLY CO
15.89
48.11WATER UTILITY G&A BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIESTERMINIX INT
48.11
8,255.00OPERATIONSOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESTHERKELSEN & ASSOCIATES INC, G
8,255.00
851.50ADMINISTRATION G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESTIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL
851.50
4,984.22TREE DISEASE PRIVATE CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICETOP NOTCH TREE CARE
4,984.22
311.51SEALCOAT PREPARATION EQUIPMENT PARTSTRI STATE BOBCAT
1,165.00SEALCOAT PREPARATION MAINTENANCE
519.18GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT PARTS
1,995.69
3.17-PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH DUE TO OTHER GOVTSTRIARCO ARTS & CRAFTS
51.92WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
101.60WESTWOOD G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR
150.35
25.66PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESTWIN CITY HARDWARE
25.66
990.00SSD 1 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESTWIN CITY OUTDOOR SERVICES INC
348.00SSD 3 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1,338.00
611.25POLICE G & A REPAIRSUHL CO INC
766.80COP SHOP OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1,378.05
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 4i)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 23
12/30/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:45:00R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
23Page -Council Check Summary
01/02/2009 -12/13/2008
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
244.50EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S UNITED WAYUNITED WAY OF MINNEAPOLIS AREA
244.50
1,600.00INSPECTIONS G & A TRAININGUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA REGIST
1,600.00
26,466.13WIRELESS G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESUNPLUGGED CITIES LLC
26,466.13
50.51-SEWER UTILITY BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTSUSA BLUE BOOK
827.58SEWER UTILITY G&A SMALL TOOLS
777.07
133.14POLICE G & A TELEPHONEUSA MOBILITY WIRELESS INC
82.72OPERATIONSTELEPHONE
215.86
37.95HUMAN RESOURCES CITEVAIL, LORI
37.95
140.02OPERATIONSOPERATIONAL SUPPLIESVALLEY NATIONAL GASES WV LLC
140.02
10,763.51WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICEVALLEY-RICH CO INC
10,763.51
385.00BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICEVIKING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER
385.00
180.00POLICE G & A FALSE ALARMWALKER, WENDY
180.00
18.00COMM DEV PLANNING G & A MEETING EXPENSEWALTHER, SEAN
236.34COMM DEV PLANNING G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR
254.34
22.49GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET CLEARING ACCOUNTWASTE MANAGEMENT
616.91SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1,564.28SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS MOTOR FUELS
55,571.30SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 4i)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 24
12/30/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:45:00R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
24Page -Council Check Summary
01/02/2009 -12/13/2008
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
23,075.50SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS YARD WASTE SERVICE
25,217.56SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE
35,621.08SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL YARD WASTE SERVICE
141,689.12
578.97CONCESSIONSCONCESSION SUPPLIESWATSON CO INC
578.97
85.70HUMAN RESOURCES TRAVEL/MEETINGSWEGNER-KOENSE, TRICIA
85.70
321.32BOILER MTCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICEWET TECHNOLOGY INC
321.32
40.00OPERATIONSGENERAL SUPPLIESWINDSCHITL, MARK
40.00
44,105.47WOLFE LAKE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESWOLFE LAKE ASSOCIATION
44,105.47
20.07OPERATIONSELECTRIC SERVICEXCEL ENERGY
35,644.66PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE
3,417.14PARK MAINTENANCE G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE
23.79BRICK HOUSE (1324)ELECTRIC SERVICE
58.39WW RENTAL HOUSE (1322)ELECTRIC SERVICE
23,311.50WATER UTILITY G&A ELECTRIC SERVICE
16.29OPERATIONSELECTRIC SERVICE
1,111.78OPERATIONSELECTRIC SERVICE
3,203.84SEWER UTILITY G&A ELECTRIC SERVICE
896.85OPERATIONSELECTRIC SERVICE
67,704.31
1,607.25WIRELESS G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESXO COMMUNICATIONS
1,607.25
768.00PRE-SCHOOL PROGRAMS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESYOUNG ARTIST RESOURCE, LLC
768.00
70.81WESTWOOD G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CARZEMBRYKI, MARK
70.81
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 4i)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 25
12/30/2008CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:45:00R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
25Page -Council Check Summary
01/02/2009 -12/13/2008
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
9.75-PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH DUE TO OTHER GOVTSZIEBART OF MINNESOTA INC
159.75ACCIDENT REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
150.00
107.22REFORESTATIONGENERAL SUPPLIESZIP PRINTING
80.28TREE MAINTENANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES
187.50
Report Totals 1,653,442.28
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 4i)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 26
Meeting Date: January 5, 2009
Agenda Item #: 4j
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Final Payment Resolution - Contract 59-08 – Valley Paving, Inc. – Project No. 2007-1100.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to adopt Resolution authorizing final payment in the amount of $11,772.04 for the 2008 MSA
Street Improvement Project - Project No. 2007-1100 with Valley Paving, Inc., City Contract No. 59-08.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
BACKGROUND:
The Municipal State Aid (MSA) street system is a network of streets, designated by the City, which are
eligible for funding from the state for periodic maintenance and reconstruction. MSA streets are typically
those major streets which have higher volumes of traffic and are required to be constructed to a higher
standard.
During the past several years, staff identified the need to rehabilitate portions of the MSA street system
through the City’s Pavement Management Program. The Pavement Management Program was developed to
extend pavement life and enhance system-wide performance in a cost-effective and efficient way by providing
the right maintenance or repair at the right time. Using the City’s pavement management software, staff
obtains street condition ratings and monitors their performance. Staff then evaluates the condition of streets
and selects cost-effective treatments to extend pavement life. West 36th Street from Hwy 100 to Beltline
Blvd was indentified for rehabilitation in 2008. The work included a mill and overlay of the asphalt surface
along with minor curb repairs.
City Council awarded the project to Valley Paving, Inc. on May 19, 2008 in the amount of $201,255.19.
The Contractor completed this work within the contract time allowed at a final contract cost of
$194,379.92.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
This project was funded by State Aid funds raised through the gas tax.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
Attachment: Resolution
Prepared by: Jim Olson, Engineering Project Manager
Reviewed by: Mike Rardin, Public Works Director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 4j) Page 2
Subject: Final Payment Resolution Contract 59-08 Valley Paving
RESOLUTION NO. 09-___
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK ON
2008 MSA STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
CITY PROJECT NO. 2007-1100
CONTRACT NO. 59-08
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. Pursuant to a written contract with the City dated May 19, 2007, Valley Paving, Inc. has satisfactorily
completed the 2008 MSA Street Improvement project, as per Contract No. 59-08.
2. The Director of Public Works has filed his recommendations for final acceptance of the work.
3. The work completed under this contract is accepted and approved. The City Manager is directed to make
final payment on the contract, taking the contractor's receipt in full.
Original Contract Price $201,255.39
Change Order .00
Underun 6,875.47
Previous Payments $182,607.88
Balance Due $11,772.04
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council January 5, 2009
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Meeting Date: January 5, 2009
Agenda Item #:8a
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
2009 Mayor Pro-Tem
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to Adopt Resolution appointing a Mayor Pro-Tem for 2009.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Who does the Council wish to appoint as Mayor Pro-Tem of the City of St. Louis Park to serve in
that capacity until a duly elected successor assumes the office at the first regular City Council
meeting in 2010?
BACKGROUND:
Minnesota State Statute section 412.121 states that at the first meeting held each year the Council
shall choose an acting Mayor from the Council members. The acting Mayor shall perform the
duties of Mayor in case of the Mayor’s disability, absence from the City, or in the case of vacancy in
the office of Mayor until a successor is appointed and qualified.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
Not Applicable.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Not Applicable.
Attachments: Resolution
Prepared by: Kris Luedke, Office Assistant
Reviewed by: Nancy Stroth, City Clerk
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 8a) Page 2
Subject: 2009 Mayor Pro Tem
RESOLUTION NO. 09-_____
RESOLUTION APPOINTING ______________
TO THE OFFICE OF MAYOR PRO-TEM
FOR THE YEAR 2009
WHEREAS, Minnesota State Statute Section 412.121 requires cities to choose each year an
acting Mayor from the Council members; and
WHEREAS, the acting Mayor shall perform the duties of Mayor during the disability or
absence of the Mayor from the City or, in case of vacancy in the office of Mayor until a successor has
been appointed and qualifies; and
WHEREAS, the Council has carefully reviewed the qualifications of all Council members
and has considered the desires of the residents and the welfare of the City as a whole,
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the St. Louis Park City Council that
___________________ is hereby appointed Mayor Pro-Tem of the City of St. Louis Park and shall
serve in that capacity until a duly elected successor assumes the office at the first regular City Council
meeting in 2010.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council January 5, 2009
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Meeting Date: January 5, 2009
Agenda Item #: 8b
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Mulberry’s Dry Cleaning - Conditional Use Permit and Variance.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to Adopt Resolutions approving a Conditional Use Permit to allow the In-Vehicle Service
and a 65 foot variance to allow a 35 foot setback from residential property for Mulberry’s Dry
Cleaning.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Is the proposed use consistent with the intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive
Plan?
BACKGROUND:
Description of Request:
The applicant is proposing to reuse the existing building at 3900 Minnetonka Blvd for a dry
cleaning pick-up and drop-off retail outlet, a permitted use in the C-1 district. A conditional use
permit is required only for the in-vehicle service. In-vehicle service is required to be setback 100 feet
from residential properties. The applicant is requesting a 65 foot variance to allow a 35 foot setback
as it is an existing building.
Location:
3900 Minnetonka Blvd.
Zoning:
Neighborhood Commercial (C-1)
Adjacent Land Uses:
West – YUM parking lot (C-1
North – Single Family (R-1)
East – France Ave & gas station
South – County 25 & commercial uses
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 8b) Page 2
Subject: Mulberry’s Dry Cleaning - Conditional Use Permit and Variance
On-Site Activities:
The applicant is proposing to operate a dry cleaning pick-up and drop-off retail outlet. Services will
include picking up and dropping off laundry and a small retail shop where customers can purchase
cleaning supplies and receive cleaning tips and advice. A tailor will also be on hand for alterations.
All cleaning activities will be conducted off site at Mulberry’s cleaning facilities located in Roseville.
In-Vehicle Sales:
The applicant would like to offer an in-vehicle service where customers can drive up and hand off
and/or receive their clothing without leaving the vehicle. The customer would drive up to the
building, where an employee walks to the car to either receive or deliver the clothing. The only
customer contact point is an employee service door located on the south side of the building. The
process does not utilize a menu board or loud speaker typically found at a drive through facility.
The applicant anticipates no more than one or two vehicles waiting to be served at any given time.
The site plan shows six vehicles in line because city code requires a site plan showing that the
stacking lane could accommodate six vehicles without hindering the flow of traffic.
Parking:
The use includes approximately 1,500 square feet of storage area, (750 square feet on the main floor,
and 750 square feet in the basement), and approximately 500 square feet of retail service area.
Size Parking Ratio Required Parking
Storage 1,500 sf 1 space/1,500 sf 1 parking space
Retail 500 sf 1 space/250 sf 2 parking spaces
Total 3 parking spaces
As shown above, the zoning ordinance requires three parking spaces for the proposed use. The
applicant is proposing to install five. The site exceeds the required number of parking.
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 8b) Page 3
Subject: Mulberry’s Dry Cleaning - Conditional Use Permit and Variance
Building:
The building was formerly a Valvoline Rapid Oil Change. The applicant is proposing to remodel
the building by removing the metal panels along the roof line and remove other Valvoline branding.
The garage doors will be replaced with large windows, and the office area will receive a brick finish,
new windows and a steel awning. The remaining portion of the building is stucco, which will be
repainted and refurbished.
Existing
Proposed
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 8b) Page 4
Subject: Mulberry’s Dry Cleaning - Conditional Use Permit and Variance
Variance:
The code requires the in-vehicle service use, which includes the drive-through facilities and stacking
areas, to be at least 100 feet away from residential properties. The subject property is surrounded on
the south, west and east side by commercial properties, and the north by an R-1 single family
property which is occupied by a duplex. At its closest point to the R-1 property, the drive-through
stacking lane is 35 feet away, and therefore, requires a 65 foot variance.
Analysis:
Section 36-33(d) of the Zoning Ordinance states that the City may grant variances from the strict
application of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance and impose conditions and safeguards
provided that all seven of the following criteria are met:
1. Where by reason of narrowness, shallowness, or shape of the lot, or where by reason of
exceptional topographic or water conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional conditions of
such lot, the strict applications of the terms of this ordinance would result in a peculiar and
practical difficulties or exceptional or undue hardship upon the owner of such lot in developing
or using such lot in a manner customary and legally permissible within the zoning district in
which said lot is located.
The lot is small for a commercial property. It is 10,300 square feet in area, and only 90 feet deep
and 115 feet wide. This small size makes it difficult to accommodate a building, required parking,
landscaping and reasonable uses such as an in-vehicle service that is limited in size and scope as
described above.
2. Conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or
immediately adjoining property and do not apply generally to other land or structures in the
district in which said land is located.
The proposed in-vehicle service, while technically qualifies as a drive-through, it is not what is
commonly thought of as a drive through facility typical of a fast food restaurant or coffee shop. The
facility will not utilize a loud speaker or menu board, and the needed customer stacking lane should
not exceed two vehicles. The vehicles will be waiting on the south side of the building while the
employee is delivering and/or picking up clothing. The building will screen the in-vehicle service
use from the residential properties to the north.
3. The granting of the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial
property right of the applicant.
The facility is a high end dry cleaning pick-up and drop-off facility. Cleaning of the clothes does not
occur at this facility, so it is important to the success of the business that it offers the convenience of
a quick and professional pick-up and drop-off valet service.
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 8b) Page 5
Subject: Mulberry’s Dry Cleaning - Conditional Use Permit and Variance
4. The granting of the variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to the adjacent
property, unreasonably increase the congestion in the public streets, increase the danger of fire,
or endanger the public safety.
The adjacent residential property will not be affected by the variance. The customer contact point
and waiting vehicles are all located on the south side of the building. The building acts as a visual
and sound barrier, making sure that the noise of idling vehicles does not reach the residential
property.
5. The granting of the variance will not unreasonably impact on the character and development of
the neighborhood, unreasonably diminish or impair the established property values in the
surrounding area, or in any other way impair the health, safety, comfort, or morals of the area.
The in-vehicle service is not a typical drive through commonly found at a fast foot restaurant of
coffee shop. It is quieter because it will not utilize a menu board or loud speaker, and it is located on
the south side of the building, opposite of the residential properties. Also, the dry cleaning use will
generate very little traffic as compared to a fast foot restaurant with breakfast, lunch and dinner time
rushes.
6. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Ordinance or
Comprehensive Plan.
The intent of the zoning ordinance and comprehensive plan is to protect the residential properties
from the noise and visual impacts associated with a fast-food style drive-through. The proposed in-
vehicle service will not utilize a menu board or loud speaker, and it is located on the south side of the
building, away from the residential properties. The proposed use will not have a noise or visual
impact on the adjacent properties, and therefore, meets the intent of the Zoning Ordinance and
Comprehensive Plan.
7. The granting of the variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is
necessary to alleviate demonstrable undue hardship or difficulty.
The property is only 90 feet wide, so the small size of the property makes it impossible to meet the
100 foot setback from the residential property to the north. Without a variance, there is no other
way for an employee to simply hand deliver clothes to a vehicle without this variance.
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 8b) Page 6
Subject: Mulberry’s Dry Cleaning - Conditional Use Permit and Variance
Public Process:
Neighborhood Meeting:
A neighborhood meeting was held on December 10, 2008. Four people were in attendance. The
proposal was well received, and no concerns were expressed.
Planning Commission:
A public hearing was conducted on December 17, 2008. No comments were received from the
public. The Commission recommended approval (7-0).
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
Attachments: Site plan
Building elevations
Aerial photograph
Resolution for CUP
Resolution for Variance
Prepared by: Gary Morrison, Assistant Zoning Administrator
Reviewed by: Meg McMonigal, Planning and Zoning Supervisor
Kevin Locke, Community Development Director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 8b) Page 7
Subject: Mulberry’s Dry Cleaning - Conditional Use Permit and Variance
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 8b) Page 8
Subject: Mulberry’s Dry Cleaning - Conditional Use Permit and Variance
Customer
Contact Point Minnetonka Blvd France Ave
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 8b) Page 9
Subject: Mulberry’s Dry Cleaning - Conditional Use Permit and Variance
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 8b) Page 10
Subject: Mulberry’s Dry Cleaning - Conditional Use Permit and Variance
Site Map
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 8b) Page 11
Subject: Mulberry’s Dry Cleaning - Conditional Use Permit and Variance
D R A F T
RESOLUTION NO. 09-____
RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT UNDER
SECTION 36-193(d)(6) OF THE ST. LOUIS PARK ORDINANCE CODE
RELATING TO ZONING TO PERMIT IN-VEHICLE SALES FOR
PROPERTY ZONED C-1 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
LOCATED AT 3900 MINNETONKA BOULEVARD
BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park:
Findings
1. Daniel G. Miller (Mulberry’s LLC) has made application to the City Council for a
Conditional Use Permit under Section 36-193(d)(6) of the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code for the
purpose of in-vehicle sales within a C-1 Neighborhood Commercial District located at 3900
Minnetonka Boulevard for the legal description as follows, to-wit:
that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 31, Township 29,
Range 24, Hennepin County, described as follows:
beginning at the Southeast corner of said Section 31; thence West along the South line of
said section a distance of 165 feet; thence North parallel to the East line of said section a
distance of 123 feet; thence East parallel to the South line of said section a distance of 165
feet to the East line of said section; thence South along the East line of said section a distance
of 123 feet to the place of beginning according to the U.S. Government survey thereof
2. The City Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning
Commission (Case No. 08-47-CUP) and the effect of the proposed in-vehicle sales on the health,
safety and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic
conditions, the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area, the effect of the use on the
Comprehensive Plan, and compliance with the intent of the Zoning Ordinance.
3. The Council has determined that the in-vehicle sales will not be detrimental to the health,
safety, or general welfare of the community nor will it cause serious traffic congestion nor hazards,
nor will it seriously depreciate surrounding property values, and the proposed use is in harmony
with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan.
4. The contents of Planning Case File 08-47-CUP are hereby entered into and made part of the
public hearing record and the record of decision for this case.
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 8b) Page 12
Subject: Mulberry’s Dry Cleaning - Conditional Use Permit and Variance
Conclusion
The Conditional Use Permit to permit in-vehicle sales at the location described is granted based on
the findings set forth above and subject to the following conditions:
1. The site shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with Exhibits incorporated by
reference herein.
2. Resolution No. 94-136 granting approval of a conditional use permit for a motor fuel station
is hereby repealed.
3. The in-vehicle service shall not utilize loud speakers or an outside menu board.
4. All customer contact points shall be located on the south side of the building.
5. A privacy fence at least six feet tall shall be maintained along the north property line.
6. Dry cleaning shall not occur at this site.
7. In addition to any other remedies, the developer or owner shall pay an administrative fee of
$750 per violation of any condition of this approval.
8. Under the Zoning Ordinance Code, this permit shall be revoked and cancelled if the building
or structure for which the conditional use permit is granted is removed.
9. Assent form and official exhibits must be signed by applicant (or applicant and owner if
applicant is different from owner) prior to issuance of a building permit.
10. Approval of a Building Permit, which may impose additional requirements.
The City Clerk is instructed to record certified copies of this resolution in the Office of the
Hennepin County Register of Deeds or Registrar of Titles as the case may be.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council January 5, 2009
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 8b) Page 13
Subject: Mulberry’s Dry Cleaning - Conditional Use Permit and Variance
D R A F T
VARIANCE
RESOLUTION NO. 09-____
RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCE FROM SECTION 36-193(d)(6)A
OF THE ORDINANCE CODE RELATING TO ZONING TO PERMIT A
35 FOOT SETBACK FROM RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES INSTEAD OF
THE REQUIRED 100 FEET FOR PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE C-1
NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT AT 3900
MINNETONKA BOULEVARD
BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of St. Louis Park, Minnesota:
Findings
1. Daniel G. Miller (Mulberry’s LLC) has applied for a variance from Section 36-193(D)(6)a of
the Ordinance Code relating to zoning to permit a drive through facility to be setback 35
feet from residential properties instead of the required 100 feet for property located in the C-
1 Neighborhood Commercial Zoning District at the following location, to-wit:
That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 31,
Township 29, Range 24, Hennepin County, described as follows:
beginning at the Southeast corner of said Section 31; thence West along the South
line of said section a distance of 165 feet; thence North parallel to the East line of
said section a distance of 123 feet; thence East parallel to the South line of said
section a distance of 165 feet to the East line of said section; thence South along the
East line of said section a distance of 123 feet to the place of beginning according to
the U.S. Government survey thereof
2. On December 17, 2008, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, received testimony
from the public, discussed the application and moved approval of a variance to allow a drive-
through facility and stacking areas to be setback 35 feet from residential properties instead of
the required 100 feet.
3. The Planning Commission considered the effect of the proposed variance upon the health,
safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and
air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, the effect on values of property in the
surrounding area, and the effect of the proposed variance upon the Comprehensive Plan.
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 8b) Page 14
Subject: Mulberry’s Dry Cleaning - Conditional Use Permit and Variance
4. Because of conditions on the subject property and surrounding property, it is possible to use
the property in such a way that the proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of
light and air to the adjacent property, unreasonably increase the congestion in the public
streets, increase the danger of fire, endanger the public safety, unreasonably diminish or
impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the
Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan.
5. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such
property or immediately adjoining property and do not apply generally to other land or
structures in the district in which such land is located.
6. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right of the applicant. It will not merely serve as a convenience to the
applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty.
7. The contents of Planning Case File 08-48-VAR are hereby entered into and made part of the
public hearing record and the record of decision of this case.
8. Under the Zoning Ordinance, this variance shall be deemed to be abandoned, revoked, or
canceled if the holder shall fail to complete the work on or before one year after the variance
is granted.
9. Under the Zoning Ordinance, this variance shall be revoked and cancelled if the building or
structure for which the variance is granted is removed.
CONCLUSION
The application for the variance is granted based upon the findings set forth above, as follows:
1. The site shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with Exhibits incorporated
by reference herein.
2. The in-vehicle service shall not utilize loud speakers or an outside menu board.
3. All customer contact points shall be located on the south side of the building.
4. A privacy fence at least six feet tall shall be maintained along the north property line.
5. Under the Zoning Ordinance Code, this variance shall be revoked and cancelled if the
building or structure for which the conditional use permit is granted is removed.
6. Assent form and official exhibits must be signed by applicant (or applicant and owner if
applicant is different from owner) prior to issuance of a building permit.
7. Approval of a Building Permit, which may impose additional requirements.
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 8b) Page 15
Subject: Mulberry’s Dry Cleaning - Conditional Use Permit and Variance
The City Clerk is instructed to record certified copies of this resolution in the Office of the
Hennepin County Register of Deeds or Registrar of Titles as the case may be.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council January 5, 2009
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Meeting Date: January 5, 2009
Agenda Item #: 8c
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendments relating to communication towers and
antennas.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion approve second reading and adopt the ordinance amending the Zoning Ordinance relating
to communication towers and antennas, and approve the summary ordinance and authorize
publication
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Should the ordinance be amended to clarify the approval process for communication towers and
antennas, and add performance standards and application submittal requirements?
BACKGROUND:
Planning Commission & City Council Review:
The proposed amendments were first presented to the Planning Commission on July 2, 2008. Since
that meeting, the Planning Commission and City Council met numerous times to review the
proposed ordinance. The discussions concentrated on several performance standards, including:
• Communication Tower heights
• Setbacks
• Interference
• Amateur Radio
• Aesthetics/neighborhood impact
• Co-locating
• Lighting
• Wetlands & floodplains
• Rooftop antennas
First Reading by City Council:
On a 5-2 vote the Council adopted the first reading of the proposed amendments on December 15,
2008. The first reading was adopted with a modification to allow communication towers in
wetlands and floodplains by conditional use permit. The following changes to the proposed
ordinance were made in accordance to the motion, and were reviewed and approved by the City
Attorney:
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 8c) Page 2
Subject: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendments Towers and Antennas
Old Language:
(3) Communication towers shall not be allowed in:
a. Department of Natural Resources (DNR) protected wetlands and Wetland
Conservation Act (WCA) jurisdiction wetlands.
b. Land located within the floodplain, flood fringe and floodway districts.
New Language:
(3) A communication tower that complies with all other requirements of this chapter is
allowed as a conditional use in a wetland, public waters wetland, Wetland
Conservation Act (WCA) wetland, flood fringe district or general floodplain district.
The standards for the issuance of a conditional use permit shall be the general criteria
contained in this chapter applicable to all conditional use permits and the specific
requirements for conditional uses in the flood fringe and general floodplain districts.
The tower shall also comply with all other applicable laws and regulations.
The new language does not allow communication towers in the floodway because FEMA will only
allow structures in the floodway under limited circumstances typically relating to bridges and flood
control. The floodway is that portion of a river or creek at flood stage where the water is flowing. It
does not include the flood fringe which is adjacent to the floodway, but due to the topography of the
land, the water is not flowing.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
N/A.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
The proposed amendments are consistent with the community vision. The amendments will
strengthen the community making it a safe, aesthetically pleasing community with quality gathering
places and well maintained housing while meeting the technology needs of its residents and
businesses.
Attachments: Proposed ordinance amendments relating to Towers and Antennas
Summary for publication
Prepared by: Gary Morrison, Assistant Zoning Administrator
Reviewed by: Meg McMonigal, Planning and Zoning Supervisor
Kevin Locke, Community Development Director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 8c) Page 3
Subject: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendments Towers and Antennas
ORDINANCE NO. ________
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO COMMUNICATION TOWERS AND
ANTENNAS, AMENDING THE ST. LOUIS PARK ORDINANCE CODE
RELATING TO ZONING BY AMENDING SECTIONS 36-4, 36-78, 36-142,
36-151, 36-164, 36-165, 36-166, 36-167, 36-193, 36-194, 36-223, 36-243, 36-263,
36-264, 36-265, 36-266, 36-267, 36-268, 36-368
THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK DOES ORDAIN:
Sec. 1. The City Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning
Commission (Case No. 08-23-ZA).
Sec. 2. The St. Louis Park Ordinance Code, Sections 36-4, 36-78, 36-142, 36-151, 36-164, 36-
165, 36-166, 36-167, 36-193, 36-194, 36-223, 36-243, 36-263, 36-264, 36-265, 36-266, 36-267, 36-268,
and 36-368 is hereby amended by deleting stricken language and adding underscored language. Section
breaks are represented by ***.
Sec. 36-4. Definitions.
***
Height-Communication Towers and Antennas. The height of a communication tower or antenna which is
not attached to a building shall be determined by measuring the vertical distance from the point of contact
with the ground of the communication tower or antenna to the highest point of the communication tower, or
antenna, including, in the case of a communication tower, all antennas and other attachments.
***
Sec. 36-78. Height limitations.
(a) Height limitations set forth elsewhere in this ordinance shall be increased by 50 percent when
applied to the following structures:
(1) Art objects in non-residential districts and accessory to permitted principal non-residential
uses (churches, schools, parks, etc.) in residential districts.
(Ord. No. 2255-03, 11-3-03)
(2) Belfries.
(3) Chimneys.
(4) Church spires.
(5) Communication towers. Heights in excess of those allowed under this section shall be
permitted only by conditional use permit granted by resolution of the city council
determining that such structure would not be dangerous and would not adversely affect
adjoining or adjacent property. This determination will be made based on the following
conditions:
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 8c) Page 4
Subject: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendments Towers and Antennas
a. Distance from abutting residential property.
b. Tower design and collapse radius.
Aesthetic considerations such as color and design.
[Renumber accordingly]
(6) Cooling towers.
(7) Cupolas and domes which do not add additional floor area.
(8) Elevator penthouses.
(9) Fire and hose towers.
(10) Flagpoles.
(11) Monuments.
(12) Observation towers.
(13) Smokestacks.
(b) Parapet walls extending not more than three feet above the limiting height of the building.
(c) Water towers are exempt from height limitations.
***
Sec. 36-142. Descriptions
***
(c.) Institutional Use.
(1) Antenna means any free-standing structure or device attached to a building used for the purpose of
collecting or transmitting electromagnetic waves through the air, including but not limited to directional
antennas, such as panels, microwaves dishes, and satellite dishes, and omni-directional antennas, such as whip
antennas, except for Building-Mounted antennas for private use on the premises where it is located, such as
amateur radio antennas, and antennas receiving television or radio signals.
(2) Communication tower means a free-standing tower structure which supports one or more antennae
and includes accessory uses directly related to the tower, such as utility buildings. those activities. The tower
and antennae heights result in negative visual and sight line impacts.
***
[Renumber accordingly]
***
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 8c) Page 5
Subject: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendments Towers and Antennas
Sec. 36-151. POS park and open space district
***
(d) Uses permitted by conditional use permit. No structure or land in any POS district shall be used
for the following uses except by conditional use permit. These uses shall comply with the requirements of all
general conditions provided in section 36-365 and with the specific conditions imposed in this subsection.
(1) Communication towers up to 70 feet in height, subject to the provisions of Section 368
(Communication Towers and Antennas).
***
(e) (d) Accessory uses.
***
(3) Communication tower
***
(f) (e) Dimensional standards/densities.
***
Sec. 36-163. R-1 single-family residence district
***
(c) Uses permitted with conditions.
***
(9) Communication towers The conditions are as follows: that are 45 feet or less in height, subject to
the provisions of Section 368 (Communication Towers and Antennas).
a. Sign shall not be permitted on the tower structure or the antenna.
b. Tower structures shall be screened to minimize visual impacts.
c. Tower structures shall be a maximum of 45 feet high.
d. Tower structures shall not be permitted within any required yard.
e. A free-standing communication tower shall be located a minimum of 1 1/2 times its collapse
radius from any property line of the site on which it is located.
(d) Uses permitted by conditional use permit.
***
(5) Communication towers more than 45 feet in height but not to exceed 70 feet in height, subject to
the provisions of Section 368 (Communication Towers and Antennas).
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 8c) Page 6
Subject: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendments Towers and Antennas
***
Sec. 36-164. R-2 single-family residence district
***
(c) Uses permitted with conditions.
(9) Communication towers The conditions are as follows: that are 45 feet or less in height, subject to
the provisions of Section 368 (Communication Towers and Antennas).
a. Signs shall not be permitted on the tower structure or the antenna.
b. Tower structures shall be screened to minimize visual impacts.
c. Tower structures shall be a maximum of 45 feet high.
d. Tower structures shall not be permitted within any required yard.
e. A free-standing communication tower shall be located a minimum of 1 1/2 times its collapse
radius from any property line of the site on which it is located.
***
(d) Uses permitted by conditional use permit.
***
(3) Communication towers more than 45 feet in height but not to exceed 70 feet in height, subject to
the provisions of Section 368 (Communication Towers and Antennas).
***
Sec. 36-165. R-3 two-family residence district
***
(c) Uses permitted with conditions.
***
(10) Communication towers The conditions are as follows: that are 45 feet or less in height, subject to
Section 368 (Communication Towers and Antennas).
a. Signs shall not be permitted on the tower structure or the antenna.
b. Tower structures shall be screened to minimize visual impacts.
c. Tower structures shall be a maximum of 52.5 feet high.
d. Tower structures shall not be permitted within any required yard.
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 8c) Page 7
Subject: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendments Towers and Antennas
e. A free-standing communication tower shall be located a minimum of 1 1/2 times its collapse
radius from any property line of the site on which it is located.
***
(d) Uses permitted by conditional use permit.
***
(4) Communication towers more than 45 feet in height but not to exceed 70 feet in height, subject to
the provisions of Section 368 (Communication Towers and Antennas).
***
Sec. 36-166. R-4 multiple-family residence district
***
(c) Uses permitted with conditions.
***
(11) Communication towers The conditions are as follows: that are 45 feet or less in height, subject to
the provisions of Section 368 (Communication Towers and Antennas).
a. Signs shall not be permitted on the tower structure or the antenna.
b. Tower structures shall be screened to minimize visual impacts.
c. Tower structures shall be a maximum of 60 feet high.
d. Tower structures shall not be permitted within any required yard.
e. A freestanding communication tower shall be located a minimum of 1 1/2 times its collapse
radius from any property line of the site on which it is located.
f. Any tower exceeding 50 feet shall be painted light blue-gray in color.
g. For any tower exceeding 50 feet in height, the applicant shall demonstrate that another
alternative to piggyback the proposed antenna on another existing tower or building is not
possible.
h. For any tower exceeding 50 feet in height, the owner shall permit joint use of the structure.
i. If any tower exceeds 50 feet in height, it shall be located at a distance of a minimum of twice
its height from any R-1, R-2 or R-3 zoned parcel.
(d) Uses permitted by conditional use permit.
***
(9) Communication towers more than 45 feet in height but not to exceed 70 feet in height, subject to
the provisions of Section 368 (Communication Towers and Antennas).
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 8c) Page 8
Subject: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendments Towers and Antennas
***
Sec. 36-167. RC high-density multiple-family residence district.
***
(c) Uses permitted with conditions.
***
(11) Communication towers The conditions are as follows: that are 45 feet or less in height, subject to
the provisions of Section 368 (Communication Towers and Antennas).
a. Signs shall not be permitted on the tower structure or the antenna.
b. Tower structures shall be screened to minimize visual impacts.
c. Tower structures shall be a maximum of 112.5 feet high.
d. Tower structures shall not be permitted within any required yard.
e. A free standing communication tower shall be located a minimum of 1 1/2 times its collapse
radius from any property line of the site on which it is located.
f. Any tower exceeding 50 feet shall be painted light blue-gray in color.
g. For any tower exceeding 50 feet in height, the applicant shall demonstrate that another
alternative to piggyback the proposed antenna on another existing tower or building is not
possible.
h. For any tower exceeding 50 feet in height, the owner shall permit joint use of the structure.
i. If any tower exceeds 50 feet in height, it shall be located at a distance of a minimum of twice
its height from any R-1, R-2 or R-3 zoned parcel.
***
(d) Uses permitted by conditional use permit.
***
(6) Communication towers and antennas more than 45 feet in height but not to exceed 70 feet in height,
subject to the provisions of Section 368 (Communication Towers and Antennas).
***
Sec. 36-193. C-1 neighborhood commercial district.
***
(c) Uses permitted with conditions.
***
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 8c) Page 9
Subject: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendments Towers and Antennas
(21) Communication towers The conditions are as follows: that are 45 feet or less in height, subject to
the provisions of Section 368 (Communication Towers and Antennas).
a. The tower structures shall be screened to minimize visual impacts.
b. The tower structures shall be a maximum of 52.5 feet high.
c. The tower structure shall not be permitted within any required yard.
d. A freestanding communication tower shall be located a minimum of 1 1/2 times its collapse
radius from any property line of the site on which it is located.
e. Any tower exceeding 50 feet shall be painted light blue-gray in color.
f. For any tower exceeding 50 feet in height, the applicant shall demonstrate that another
alternative to piggyback the proposed antenna on another existing tower or building is not
possible.
g. For any tower exceeding 50 feet in height, the owner shall permit joint use of the structure.
h. If any tower exceeds 50 feet in height, it shall be located at a distance of a minimum of twice
its height from any R-1, R-2 or R-3 zoned parcel.
i. Signs shall not be permitted on the tower structure or the antenna.
***
(d) Conditional uses. Uses permitted by conditional use permit.
***
(9) Communication towers more than 45 feet in height but not to exceed 70 feet in height, subject to
the provisions of Section 368 (Communication Towers and Antennas).
***
Sec. 36-194. C-2 general commercial district.
***
(c) Uses permitted with conditions.
***
(20) Communication towers The conditions are as follows: that are 110 feet or less in height, subject to
the provisions of Section 368 (Communication Towers and Antennas).
a. The tower structures shall be screened to minimize visual impacts.
b. The tower structures shall be a maximum of 112.5 feet high.
c. The tower structure shall not be permitted within any required yard.
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 8c) Page 10
Subject: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendments Towers and Antennas
d. A freestanding communication tower shall be located a minimum of 1 1/2 times its collapse
radius from any property line of the site on which it is located.
e. Any tower exceeding 50 feet shall be painted light blue-gray in color.
f. For any tower exceeding 50 feet in height, the applicant shall demonstrate that another
alternative to piggyback the proposed antenna on another existing tower or building is not
possible.
g. For any tower exceeding 50 feet in height, the owner shall permit joint use of the structure.
h. If any tower exceeds 50 feet in height, it shall be located at a distance of a minimum of twice
its height from any R-1, R-2 or R-3 zoned parcel.
i. Signs shall not be permitted on the tower structure or the antenna.
***
(d) Uses permitted by conditional use permit.
***
(15) Communication towers more than 110 feet in height but not to exceed 170 feet in height, subject to
the provisions of Section 368 (Communication Towers and Antennas).
***
Sec. 36-223. O Office district.
***
(c) Uses permitted with conditions.
***
(17) Communication towers The conditions are as follows: that are 110 feet or less in height, subject to
the provisions of Section 368 (Communication Towers and Antennas).
a. Communication towers shall be screened to the greatest extent practicable to minimize visual
impacts.
b. Communication towers shall be limited in height to 360 feet.
c. Communication towers shall not be permitted within any required yard.
d. No freestanding communication tower shall be located within 1 1/2 times its collapse radius
from any property line.
e. Any tower exceeding 50 feet shall be painted light blue-gray in color.
f. If a tower exceeds 50 feet in height, the applicant shall demonstrate that the desired result
cannot be achieved by piggybacking the proposed antenna on another existing tower or
building.
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 8c) Page 11
Subject: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendments Towers and Antennas
g. The owner shall permit joint use of any tower exceeding 50 feet in height.
h. Any tower exceeding 50 feet in height shall bc located at a distance of at least 1.5 times its
height from any R-1, R-2 or R-3 district.
i. Signs shall not be permitted on the tower structure or the antenna.
***
(d) Uses permitted by conditional use permit.
***
(10) Communication towers more than 110 feet in height but not to exceed 170 feet in height, subject to
the provisions of Section 368 (Communication Towers and Antennas).
***
Sec. 36-243. I-P industrial park district.
***
(c) Uses permitted with conditions.
***
(4) Communication towers The conditions are as follows: that are 110 feet or less in height, subject to
the provisions of Section 368 (Communication Towers and Antennas).
a. Signs shall not be permitted on the tower structure or the antenna.
b. Tower structures shall be screened to minimize visual impacts.
c. Tower structures shall be a maximum of 112.5 feet high.
d. Tower structures shall not be permitted within any required yard.
e. A freestanding communication tower shall be located a minimum of 1 1/2 times its collapse
radius from any property line of the site on which it is located.
f. Any tower exceeding 50 feet shall be painted light blue-gray in color.
g. For any tower exceeding 50 feet in height, the applicant shall demonstrate that another
alternative to piggyback the proposed antenna on another existing tower or building is not
possible.
h. For any tower exceeding 50 feet in height, the owner shall permit joint use of the structure.
i. If any tower exceeds 50 feet in height, it shall be located at a distance of a minimum of twice
its height from any R-1, R-2 or R-3 zoned parcel.
***
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 8c) Page 12
Subject: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendments Towers and Antennas
(d) Uses permitted by conditional use permit.
***
(5) Communication towers more than 110 feet in height but not to exceed 199 feet in height, subject to
the provisions of Section 368 (Communication Towers and Antennas).
***
Sec. 36-244. I-G general industrial district.
***
(c) Uses permitted with conditions.
***
(8) Communication towers The conditions are as follows: that are 110 feet or less in height, subject to
the provisions of Section 368 (Communication Towers and Antennas).
a. Signs shall not be permitted on the tower structure or the antenna.
b. Tower structures shall be screened to minimize visual impacts.
c. Tower structures shall be a maximum of 112.5 feet high.
d. Tower structures shall not be permitted within any required yard.
e. A freestanding communication tower shall be located a minimum of 1 1/2 times its collapse
radius from any property line of the site on which it is located.
f. Any tower exceeding 50 feet shall be painted light blue-gray in color.
g. For any tower exceeding 50 feet in height, the applicant shall demonstrate that another
alternative to piggyback the proposed antenna on another existing tower or building is not
possible.
h. For any tower exceeding 50 feet in height, the owner shall permit joint use of the structure.
i. If any tower exceeds 50 feet in height, it shall be located at a distance of a minimum of twice
its height from any R-1, R-2 or R-3 zoned parcel.
***
Uses permitted by conditional use permit.
***
(4) Communication towers that are more than 110 feet in height but not to exceed 199 feet in height,
subject to the provisions of Section 368 (Communication Towers and Antennas).
***
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 8c) Page 13
Subject: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendments Towers and Antennas
DIVISION 8. M-X MIXED USE DISTRICT
***
Section 36-263. Uses permitted with conditions
(1) General cConditions for mixed use development are as follows:
a. (1) The development is in conformance with the comprehensive plan land use designations for the
area.
b. (2) The development is in conformance with a redevelopment plan for the area that has been adopted
as part of the comprehensive plan.
c. (3) The development conforms with all performance standards of this district or an adopted overlay
district for the area unless certain standards are specifically waived or amended by the adopted
redevelopment plan.
(Code 1976, § 14:5-8C)
(2) Communication towers that are 45 feet or less in height, subject to the provisions of Section 368
(Communication Towers and Antennas).
Section 36-264. Uses permitted by conditional use permit.
(1) Communication towers more than 45 feet in height but not to exceed 70 feet in height, subject to
the provisions of Section 368 (Communication Towers and Antennas).
Sec. 36-264 265. Uses permitted by PUD.
***
Sec. 36-265 266. Accessory uses.
***
(3) Parking lots designed in accordance with section 36-361 except that the number of required spaces
may be reduced as provided in subsection 36-266267(6).
***
Sec. 36-266 267. Dimensional/performance standards and general requirements.
***
Secs. 36-267268--36-290. Reserved.
***
Sec. 36-368. Communication towers and antennas.
(a) Purpose.
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 8c) Page 14
Subject: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendments Towers and Antennas
(1) To accommodate the reasonable communication needs of residents and business in the
community while protecting the public health, safety, and general welfare of the community;
(2) To establish appropriate maximum heights of communication towers and antennas,
considering their potential adverse impacts on the community at large and the ability to
mitigate such impacts;
(3) To minimize adverse impacts on properties in close proximity to communication towers and
antennas;
(4) To minimize adverse visual effects of communication towers and antennas through careful
design and siting standards;
(5) To avoid potential damage to adjacent properties from communication tower and antenna
failure through structural standards and setback requirements; and,
(6) To maximize the use of existing communication towers, antennas and buildings to
accommodate new antennas in order to reduce the number of communication towers needed
to serve the community.
(b) Zoning compliance. Communication towers and antennas are allowed as provided in each zoning
district and must be in compliance with the provisions of this Ordinance.
(c) Co-Location Requirements.
(1) A proposal for a new communication tower or antenna shall not be approved unless the
applicant shows that the antenna cannot be reasonably accommodated on an existing
communication tower or building.
(2) The owner of any communication tower exceeding 50 feet in height constructed after the
effective date of this Ordinance shall permit the reasonable joint use of the structure for
other antennas.
(d) Communication Tower Setbacks.
(1) Monopoles shall be setback at least 10 feet from all lot lines. Communication towers of all
other construction types shall be setback a distance equal to 1.5 times their engineered
collapse radius or a distance equal to their height, whichever is less.
(2) All communication towers shall be located a minimum distance of twice their height from
any parcel zoned or used for residential purposes, or zoned mixed-use.
(3) Communication towers shall not be located between a principal structure and a public street,
with the following exceptions:
a. In industrial zoning districts, communication towers may be placed between the
building and the side lot line abutting a street.
b. On sites adjacent to public streets on all sides, communication towers may be placed
between the building and either the side lot line abutting a street or the rear lot line.
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 8c) Page 15
Subject: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendments Towers and Antennas
(e) Location specific regulations for communication towers and antennas.
(1) Residential Zoning Districts.
a. No more than one communication tower is allowed per parcel. Communication towers
located on parcels occupied by residential dwellings are only allowed in the rear yard.
b. Communication towers and antennas located on property used for residential purposes
shall be limited to communication towers and antennas used for the private enjoyment
of those on the premises.
(2) Antennas in the Public Right-of-Way. Antennas may co-locate on existing poles or
communication towers in the City, County, or State right-of-way within any zoning district.
A City Public Works permit for uses in the public right-of-way and written permission from
applicable jurisdictions are required.
(3) A communication tower that complies with all other requirements of this chapter is allowed
as a conditional use in a wetland, public waters wetland, Wetland Conservation Act (WCA)
wetland, flood fringe district or general floodplain district. The standards for the issuance of
a conditional use permit shall be the general criteria contained in this chapter applicable to
all conditional use permits and the specific requirements for conditional uses in the flood
fringe and general floodplain districts. The tower shall also comply with all other applicable
laws and regulations.
(f) Communication Tower and Antenna Design Requirements. Proposed or modified
communication towers and antennas shall meet the following design requirements.
(1) Communication towers up to 120 feet in height shall be of a monopole type.
(2) Antenna designs and mounts shall be designed to minimize visual impact.
(3) Communication Tower Lighting. Communication towers shall not be illuminated by
artificial means and shall not display strobe lights unless such lighting is specifically required
by the Federal Aviation Administration or other federal or state law or regulation that
preempts local regulations.
(4) Signs, Advertising and Display. The use of any portion of a communication tower for
displaying flags, signs other than warning or equipment information signs is prohibited.
(5) Associated Equipment. Ground equipment associated with a communication tower or
antenna shall be housed in a building. The building shall meet the architectural design
standards of the Zoning Ordinance , and shall meet the minimum communication tower
setback requirements of the underlying zoning district.
(g) Communication Tower Construction and Maintenance Requirements.
(1) Construction Requirements. All antennae and communication towers erected, constructed,
or located within the City shall obtain a building permit. Every communication tower or
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 8c) Page 16
Subject: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendments Towers and Antennas
free-standing antenna shall be protected to discourage climbing of the tower or antenna by
unauthorized persons.
(2) Maintenance. Communication tower and antenna finish and paint shall be maintained in
good condition, free from rust, graffiti, peeling paint, or other blemish.
(h) Building-Mounted Antennas.
(1) Antennas attached to a building shall be no higher than 30 feet above the highest point of
the building.
(2) All building-mounted equipment shall be consistent with the architectural features of the
building and be painted to match the color of the building exterior, roof or sky, whichever is
most effective, as determined by the Zoning Administrator.
(i) Free-Standing Antennas. Any antenna that is a separate structure and not attached to a building
shall comply with all height and other requirements of this Chapter relating to Towers.
(j) Additional Submittal Requirements. In addition to the information required elsewhere in this
Code, applications for communication towers or antennas that are permitted with conditions or
require a conditional use permit shall include the following supplemental information unless it is
determined by the Zoning Administrator that certain information is not required based upon the
nature of the proposed antenna or communication tower:
(1) A report from a qualified and licensed professional engineer that:
a. Describes the communication tower height, width including antennas, and design
including a cross section and elevation; a site plan which demonstrates all building
dimensions and horizontal setbacks of associated equipment, HVAC and decibels,
paving, landscaping, security lighting , and fencing.
b. Documents the height above grade for all potential mounting positions for co-located
antennas and the minimum separation distances between antennas;
c. Describes the communication tower's capacity, including the number and type of
antennas that it can accommodate;
d. Documents what steps the applicant will take to avoid interference with established
public safety telecommunications;
e. Includes an engineer's stamp and registration number;
f. Includes other information necessary to evaluate the request;
g. Includes the dimensions and expected quality of the existing and proposed transmission
service area;
h. Includes the location, depth of utilities and other land lines connected to the
communication tower and associated equipment;
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 8c) Page 17
Subject: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendments Towers and Antennas
i. Reviews potential interference with public safety telecommunications equipment, and
renders an opinion as to what the interference issues may be resulting from the proposed
antenna, and recommendations as to how the interference can be mitigated. The report
must also state whether or not the proposed antenna complies with all non-interference
requirements of the FCC, a copy of the FCC approval of the antennae in regards to non-
interference must be attached.
(2) For all communication towers which are not used solely for private use antenna, a letter of
intent committing the communication tower owner and his or her successors to allow the
shared use of the communication tower if an additional user agrees in writing to meet
reasonable terms and conditions for shared use.
(3) Before the issuance of a conditional use permit and/or building permit, proof that the
proposed communication tower complies with regulations administered by the Federal
Aviation Administration and Federal Communications Commission shall be submitted.
(k) Discontinued or Unused Communication Towers or Antennas. All discontinued or unused
communication or antennas or portions of communication towers and antennas, together with
associated facilities shall be removed within 12 months of the cessation of operations at the site. In
the event that a communication tower is not removed within 12 months of the cessation of
operations at a site, the communication tower and associated facilities may be removed by the City
and the costs of removal assessed against the property.
(l) Amateur Radio Towers.
(1) Communication towers supporting amateur radio antennas shall be exempt from subsections
(d)(1) and (d)(2) above. They shall be setback at least 15 feet from any property line.
(2) Amateur radio towers must be installed in accordance with the instructions furnished by the
manufacturer of that tower model. Because of the experimental nature of amateur radio
service, antennas mounted on such a tower may be modified or changed at any time so long
as the published allowable load on the tower is not exceeded and the structure of the tower
remains in accordance with the manufacturer’s specifications.
(3) As part of any administrative or Conditional Use Permit approval, any requirements of this
Chapter may be modified to the extent necessary to provide reasonable accommodations to
an amateur radio antenna to the extent required by federal law.
(m) Legal Non-Conforming Towers. New or replacement antennas may be installed on a legal non-
conforming tower so long as the new or replacement antenna does not increase the overall height of
the tower and is designed to minimize visual impact.
Sec. 3. The contents of Planning Case File 08-23-ZA are hereby entered into and made part of the
public hearing record and the record of decision for this case.
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 8c) Page 18
Subject: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendments Towers and Antennas
Sec. 4. This Ordinance shall take effect fifteen days after its publication.
First Reading December 15, 2008
Second Reading January 5, 2009
Date of Publication January 8, 2009
Date Ordinance takes effect January 23, 2009
Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council January 5, 2009
City Manager Mayor
Attest: Approved as to Form and Execution:
City Clerk City Attorney
Meeting of January 5, 2009 (Item No. 8c) Page 19
Subject: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendments Towers and Antennas
SUMMARY FOR PUBLICATION
ORDINANCE NO._____________
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO COMMUNICATION TOWERS AND
ANTENNAS, AMENDING THE ST. LOUIS PARK ORDINANCE CODE
RELATING TO ZONING BY AMENDING SECTIONS 36-4, 36-78, 36-142,
36-151, 36-164, 36-165, 36-166, 36-167, 36-193, 36-194, 36-223, 36-243, 36-263,
36-264, 36-265, 36-266, 36-267, 36-268, 36-368
This ordinance amends the Zoning Ordinance regulations relating to height, set back distances and other
performance standards of communication towers and antennas located in all zoning districts in the City.
This ordinance shall take effect 15 days after publication.
Adopted by the City Council January 5, 2009
Jeffrey W. Jacobs /s/
Mayor
A copy of the full text of this ordinance is available for inspection with the City Clerk.
Published in St. Louis Park Sailor: January 8, 2009