HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011/01/24 - ADMIN - Agenda Packets - City Council - Study SessionAGENDA
JANUARY 24, 2011
(Sue Santa Out)
6:30 p.m. CLOSED EXECUTIVE SESSION – Westwood Room
1. 6:30 p.m. City Manager Evaluation
7:30 p.m. CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION – Council Chambers
Discussion Items
1. 7:30 p.m. Future Study Session Agenda Planning – February 7 and February 14, 2011
2. 7:35 p.m. Vision St. Louis Park Community Check-In
3. 7:50 p.m. Bidding and Construction / Project Management
4. 8:50 p.m. Highway 100 Project Update
5. 9:35 p.m. Communications / Meeting Check-in (Verbal)
9:40 p.m. Adjourn
Written Reports
6. 2011 Grant Year Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds Proposed
Allocation
7. Wireless Internet Service Update
8. Microsoft Home Use and E-Learning Programs
9. Project Update - W. 44th Street Reconstruction - Project 2005-0500
10. Update on Nestlé HealthCare Nutrition Plant Closing
11. December 2010 Monthly Financial Report
12. Fourth Quarter Investment Report (October - December, 2010)
Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request.
To make arrangements, please call the Administration Department at
952/924-2525 (TDD 952/924-2518) at least 96 hours in advance of
Meeting Date: January 24, 2011
Agenda Item #: 1
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other: CLOSED EXECUTIVE SESSION
TITLE:
City Manager Evaluation.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
J. Forrest, Consultant, will review the information from the annual performance review for Tom
Harmening, City Manager. Council will discuss the information from the evaluation process and
set general direction for work for 2011.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
BACKGROUND:
Consultant J. Forrest will update the City Council and City Manager in a Closed Executive
Session on the results of the City Manager’s performance evaluation. The information will be
sent to the Council under separate cover. The discussion will proceed as follows:
• The summary of the information from the evaluation will be presented by Mr. Forrest.
Council will provide comments or suggestions.
• City Manager Tom Harmening will join the Council and participate in the conversation,
reviewing work from 2010 and setting direction for 2011.
• Once completed, final documents will be presented for formal approval at the next
regular Council meeting.
In accordance with Minnesota open meeting law, this meeting will be audio taped. The law
states:
“All closed meetings, except those as permitted by the attorney-client privilege, must be
electronically recorded at the expense of the public body. Unless otherwise provided by
law, the recordings must be preserved for at least three years after the date of the
meeting.”
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
Attachments: None
Prepared by: Ali Fosse, HR Coordinator
Approved by: Nancy Deno Gohman, Deputy City Manager/HR Director
Meeting Date: January 24, 2011
Agenda Item #: 1
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Future Study Session Agenda Planning – February 7 and February 14, 2011.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Council and the City Manager to set the agenda for the regularly scheduled Study Session on
February 7 and February 14, 2011.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Does the Council agree with the agendas as proposed?
BACKGROUND:
At each study session, approximately five minutes are set aside to discuss the next study session
agenda. For this purpose, attached please find the tentative agendas and proposed discussion
items for the study session scheduled for February 7 and February 14, 2011.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
None.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
None.
Attachment: Future Study Session Agenda Planning February 7 and February 14, 2011
Prepared by: Kris Luedke, Office Assistant
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
Study Session Meeting of January 24, 2011 (Item No. 1) Page 2
Subject: Future Study Session Agenda Planning
Special Study Session, Monday, February 7 – 7:00 p.m.
1. 2011 City Council Workshop – Administrative Services (30 minutes)
The Council’s annual workshop is scheduled for March 11 and 12. To allow for preparation
of this workshop staff would like to discuss with the Council the makeup of the agenda.
Reports:
Freight Rail Update
Study Session, Monday, February 14, 2011 – 6:30 p.m.
Tentative Discussion Items
1. Future Study Session Agenda Planning – Administrative Services (5 minutes)
2. Park Summit Apartment Project – Community Development (30 minutes)
A major amendment to Planned Unit Development (PUD) increasing units from 145 to 192
and redesigning the building.
3. Fire Station-Final Site Plan & Cost Estimates – Community Development/Fire (30 minutes)
The construction drawing phase concludes with a presentation by City staff, architect and
construction manager of the plans for Fire Stations #1 and #2, and the final cost estimates.
If City Council is comfortable with the plans and estimates, formal action to Approve Plans
and Specifications and Authorize Bids will be placed on the February 21, 2011 Regular
Meeting Agenda.
4. Freight Rail – Community Development (60 minutes)
Rail consultant Dave McKenzie, SEH will provide an analysis of the viability of the three
remaining alternative routes under consideration: co-locating freight rail, light rail and
regional trail in Kenilworth; co-locating freight rail and light rail in Kenilworth and move
regional trail; utilizing freight rate subsidies for TCW to operate on routes west of the
metro area. The analysis would focus on answering the city’s policy question: are there
any viable alternatives to the MNS route for TCW traffic?
5. Human Rights Commission 2010 Annual Report and 2011 Work Plan – Police (5 minutes)
The City Council will be asked to review the Human Rights Commission’s work plan and
annual report. If so desired by the City Council, on February 28, 2011 the Commissioners
and staff liaisons will discuss the annual report and work plan with Council. Council will
be asked to provide feedback to the Commissioners.
6. Police Advisory Commission 2010 Annual Report and 2011 Work Plan – Police (5 minutes)
The City Council will be asked to review the Police Advisory Commission’s work plan and
annual report. If so desired by the City Council, on February 28, 2011 the Commissioners
and staff liaisons will discuss the annual report and work plan with Council. Council will
be asked to provide feedback to the Commissioners.
7. Communications/Meeting Check-in – Administrative Services (5 minutes)
Time for communications between staff and Council will be set aside on every study
session agenda for the purposes of information sharing.
Reports:
None at this time.
End of Meeting: 8:50 p.m.
Meeting Date: January 24, 2011
Agenda Item #: 2
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Vision St. Louis Park Community Check-In.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff requests Council provide feedback on the information and recommendations in this report.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
• Does Council agree with the proposed plan and dates/times for this meeting?
• Does Council agree with the proposed agenda for this meeting?
BACKGROUND:
On November 8, 2010 at the City Council Study Session Council requested that they would like
some type of one-time public gathering in order to check-in with residents on the four strategic
directions of Vision, which are:
• St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged community.
• St. Louis Park is committed to being a leader in environmental stewardship. We will
increase environmental consciousness and responsibility in all areas of city business.
• St. Louis Park is committed to providing a well-maintained and diverse housing stock.
• St. Louis Park is committed to promoting and integrating arts, culture, and community
aesthetics in all City initiatives, including implementation where appropriate.
It was further noted that the information shared with St. Louis Park residents would be presented
in a way that people understand that the City and Council want to hear ideas. The purpose is to
discuss and listen and check in with community members Vision related activities. It is not
intended to create a task list or action items from the sessions. Suggestions may be discussed
and it is important for all to understand that there will be no promise that the City is going to do
whatever may be suggested.
Staff met and came up with a proposed plan, dates/times and agenda (attached) for the Vision St.
Louis Park Community Check-In.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
None.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
This item is linked directly to the Vision Strategic Direction that St. Louis Park is committed to
being a connected and engaged community.
Attachments: Vision St. Louis Park Community Check-In Proposed Plan
Vision St. Louis Park Community Check-In Proposed Agenda
Prepared by: Debbie Fischer, Office Assistant
Reviewed by: Bridget Gothberg, Organizational Development Coordinator
Approved by: Nancy Deno Gohman, Deputy City Manager/HR Director
Study Session Meeting of January 24, 2011 (Item No.2) Page 2
Subject: Vision St. Louis Park Community Check-In
PROPOSED PLAN
Vision St. Louis Park Community Check-In
May 3, 2011
Day Group: 7:30 a.m. – 10:30 a.m.
Evening Group: 6:30 p.m. -- 9:30 p.m.
Outcomes of the Meetings
• To inform the community of progress of Vision St. Louis Park.
• To connect with and engage the community in dialogue (discussion, not direction) in order to:
o Gain an understanding what our citizens are thinking and feeling.
o Broaden the City of St. Louis Park’s understanding of citizens’ experiences and
perceptions in relation to Vision St. Louis Park.
o Remind and encourage St. Louis Park citizens on how to be a part of and/or get
involved in Vision St. Louis Park.
• Report Back to Council.
Set Up
• There will be 4 tables representing each Strategic Direction.
o St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged community.
o St. Louis Park is committed to being a leader in environmental stewardship. We will
increase environmental consciousness and responsibility in all areas of city business.
o St. Louis Park is committed to providing a well-maintained and diverse housing
stock.
o St. Louis Park is committed to promoting and integrating arts, culture, and
community aesthetics in all City initiatives, including implementation where
appropriate.
• Tables will be staffed. The community can visit these tables prior to the meeting, at break
and after the meeting.
• The Council Chamber will be set up with tables and chairs so we can do the Vision Check-
In and educate, answer questions and have a world café dialogue.
• We want both the informal (tables) and more formal (agenda) which will give us ample
opportunity to hear from citizens.
Communication/Publicity/Invitations
• It will be in the Park Perspective and on our Web-Site.
• We will work with our Vision Partners (School District/Park Nicollet/Children
First/TwinWest Chamber) to help us promote attendance.
• We will send out email invites to boards and commissions and ask them to encourage
friends/neighbors to attend.
• We will use both the Sailor and Patch to invite.
• We will use our local cable station to promote the event.
Study Session Meeting of January 24, 2011 (Item No.2) Page 3
Subject: Vision St. Louis Park Community Check-In
PROPOSED AGENDA
Vision St. Louis Park Community Check-In
1. Welcome (5 minutes)
2. Video (10 minutes)
3. What has happened since 2006: We can give updates of each of the four areas—some
will take longer than others. Examples of this might be:
a. Arts and Culture (5 minutes MAXIMUM with pictures of the new sculptures, a
poetry event, etc.)
b. Housing (10 minute update)
c. Community Connections (20 minute Update on the civic center research, trails,
public processes, and other things we have done differently as a result of vision.
For example, we might even want to add some of our partners’ successes in this
area—example could be the personalized Champion Charges done by Children
First and each partner.)
d. Environment (25 minute Update since this is more complex and it involves so
many departments.)
4. Questions and Answers (15 minutes)
5. BREAK (15 minutes)
6. Come back to a World Café setting and focus on questions like:
a. What had real meaning for you from what you’ve heard? What surprised you?
What do you want to tell us?
b. What is missing in the Four Vision Areas, that if present, it would make St. Louis
Park an even better place to live?
c. If there was one thing that hasn’t yet been said that you think is important for the
City Council and City staff to know what would that be?
(60 minutes total)
7. Recap the World Café. (20 minutes)
8. Thank people for coming.
Meeting Date: January 24, 2011
Agenda Item #: 3
Regular Meeting: Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Bidding and Construction / Project Management.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
None - the purpose of this discussion is to provide Council with basic information on public
sector project development, bidding, and construction management processes; and, answer
questions raised by Council at the September 20, 2010 study session.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Are there additional topics or areas relating to public sector bidding and construction/project
management that the City Council would like staff to research and discuss further at a future
study session?
BACKGROUND:
The City Council has developed a priority list of 6 items to be discussed at future study sessions.
Staff is working to bring these discussion items to Council the first quarter of 2011. The list
includes:
1. Construction/Project Management – January 24th
2. Review of Policies - Expenses that are City vs. Property Owner or Combination -
February
3. Storm Water/Surface water Management – session held January 10th
4. BN Bridge Replacement
5. City Council Meeting Audience Norms/Rules
6. Reilly Tar 101
History on Construction/Project Management
1. At the regular meeting held on September 7, 2010, Council expressed an interest in
discussing bidding and construction / project management. At the Study Session held on
September 20, 2010, Council provided staff with a long list of questions they would like
answered plus requested staff provide them with a basic background on project
management at a future Study Session.
Basic Project Development / Management Information
The following outline presents the basic phases associated with project management from
conception through construction to the operational phase:
1. Planning - significant policy involvement, target date set, budget and scope
conceptualization; visioning, policy, and planning skills utilized during this project phase.
• develop project charter (determine - project mgr, mission, scope, unknowns, risks)
• develop project management plan (determine - goals/success factors, scope, schedule,
budget, roles/responsibilities/coordination, risk analysis/mgmt, quality control
process, change mgmt process, project delivery method)
Study Session Meeting of January 24, 2011 (Item No. 3) Page 2
Subject: Bidding and Construction / Project Management
2. Design - less policy involvement, scope is defined, and budget defined, but subject to
change; technical mgmt skills utilized during this project phase.
3. Construction - little to no policy involvement, scope and schedule defined by contract
documents, and budget (for the most part) defined by contracts; construction mgmt skills
utilized during this project phase.
• bid / contracting process
• contractor management
• change / claims management
• health and safety
• completion and acceptance
4. Closeout - final project documentation completed and filed, financial reconciliation and
invoicing / assessing, O&M manuals, staff training, as-builts, and project review /
critique; technical and financial mgmt skills utilized during this project phase.
5. O & M - facility / asset ownership and use.
Basic Project Components / Variables
The following project components or variables seem to be inherent in all projects and of most
significant value to most projects. Basic management theory implies that it is possible to control
only two of the following three variables - time, cost, and quality. Basic project management
theory expands that to five variables - schedule, budget, quality, risk, and scope. Generally
speaking, three or possibly four of these variables are controlled at the expense of the other(s).
1. schedule (time)
2. budget (cost)
3. quality (quality)
4. risk
5. scope
Council Questions from the September Study Session
The following is the list of questions from the September 20th study session that Council wished
answered:
Authority Questions:
1. Do we need to use Mn/DOT to oversee projects?
Answer: no
2. What is the City role or responsibility on other agency projects?
Answer: as a stakeholder we have input that should be considered; beyond that, only as
otherwise mutually agreed to. Agencies are required to comply with our ordinances, etc
as specified by statute.
3. How far can the City push a project when it is being managed by another government
entity?
Answer: only as allowed in number 2 above.
Study Session Meeting of January 24, 2011 (Item No. 3) Page 3
Subject: Bidding and Construction / Project Management
4. What is the role of a project engineer?
Answer: the preferred role would be the Engineer decides all questions regarding:
(a) quality and acceptability of materials furnished and work performed
(b) manner of performance and rate of progress of the work
(c) interpretation of the Plans, Specifications, and Special Provisions
(d) measurement, control of quantities, and the amount of any deductions or
adjustments to be made in payment
(e) acceptable fulfillment of all Contract provisions on the part of the contractor
5. What is Mn/DOT’s role and responsibility when they act as the project engineer?
Answer: as owner, they perform as in number 4 above. When the city is the owner, they
act as our agent (such as on the Hwy 7 / Wooddale project) where they simply represent
us as the same as a consultant would.
6. What is the role of City staff in terms of monitoring?
Answer: City staff monitor projects City daily and will fulfill project engineer duties to
the extent authorized by Council.
7. What is a “change order” and at what level does it become a change order instead of the
ordinary course of doing business?
Answer: generally a change order results from either a decision by the city to change the
scope of the project or an increase in the contractor’s work due to a concealed or
unknown condition or claimed breach by the city of its contract obligations. A change
order can involve an increase or decrease in the contract amount or a change to the time
to complete the contract, or both. Whether something is a change order versus an
additional cost or time delay that is part of the contractor’s risk depends on the particular
contract language and the facts of each particular circumstance.
8. What is the approval process for a change order?
Answer: The City Manger has been authorized by Council to approve change orders up
to a cumulative total of $100,000; after that, Council approval is required. The City
Manager has also been authorized by Council to approve time extensions or minor
changes that do not affect the scope of the contract (see attachments - City Change Order
Procedure and Parks and Recreation Department bids and change orders).
9. How can the City limit liability for change orders that it does not initiate?
Answer: to be answered / discussed at the study session.
10. Can we eliminate, ignore, or refuse change orders we do not like?
Answer: to be answered / discussed at the study session.
11. Should a problem arise, when and how is the Council notified to assure there is no time
lapse?
Answer: sometimes not at all, other times within hours via the City Manager. This
should be discussed further to determine Council’s desire to be involved in contract or
project change decisions.
12. When do private utilities have responsibility and what is their role and responsibility?
Answer: generally, private utility companies are obligated to move their facilities located
in city right of way at their cost when they interfere with the project. Timely utility
relocations are a constant problem for cities.
Study Session Meeting of January 24, 2011 (Item No. 3) Page 4
Subject: Bidding and Construction / Project Management
Bidding Questions:
13. Information on the contractor’s experience, background, ability to come in at cost, and if
they have been sued. How is the lowest responsible bidder vetted by staff?
Answer: required bid submittals are reviewed which include legal requirements,
contractor designated personnel, contractor designated equipment, contractor designated
subcontractors along with known past construction experience in City or other agencies.
14. What is the statutory definition of “lowest and responsible bidder?”
Answer: Courts have interpreted the responsibility of bidders to mean financial
responsibility, integrity, skill, and the likelihood of performing faithful and satisfactory
work.
15. What rights and responsibilities does the Council have under State law to reject bids,
accept a bid, or rebid the project?
Answer: City must award to lowest responsible bidder; city can reject all bids and rebid a
project.
16. What questions should be asked when the low bid is substantially lower than
competitors?
Answer: to be answered / discussed at the study session.
Contract / Specification Requirement Questions:
1. What options are there for mandatory inclusion of alternate dispute resolution (ADR) to
bring parties to the table?
Answer: City has complete control over what type, if any, of mandatory Alternative
Dispute Resolution (ADR) process is included in the contract. Typically, city does not
include a binding arbitration provision in the contact specifications. This can be
discussed further.
2. Can we include diversity language for women and minorities?
Answer: The City does support this type of statement. On June 7, 2010, the City Council
adopted resolution 10-060 supporting minority-owned business, women’s business
enterprises and small business. The City of St. Louis Park will provide information to,
support and encourage contracting, professional services and purchasing with such
agencies. Typically, very few, if any, local agencies require further tracking systems and
requirements since it is a complex and costly endeavor. This can be discussed further.
Design Questions:
1. Do projects always consider the issues of pedestrian and bicyclist access and safety?
Answer: yes.
Study Session Meeting of January 24, 2011 (Item No. 3) Page 5
Subject: Bidding and Construction / Project Management
Performance Questions:
1. What is the general process used by staff to arrive at a cost estimate?
Answer: project engineer expertise along with the project design / components and
specification requirements (schedule, quality, risk assignment, and scope / magnitude).
The attached example project estimate will be discussed at the study session.
2. Can staff provide a summary of recent projects in terms of estimated costs, low bid, and
final costs?
Answer: please see attachment “Project History”
3. Can staff provide a summary of past bids comparing low bid amounts to next higher bid
amounts to understand impact of change orders?
Answer: please see attachment “Project History”
Planning Questions:
1. When should the City hire a construction manager or use independent reviews to help
assess what should happen and what it should cost?
Answer: when staff recommends based on workload or expertise needed to deliver a
specific project.
Other Questions:
1. Can staff provide information on processes that have worked well in the past?
Answer: more specifics are required to be able to answer this question. This can be
discussed at the study session.
2. What tools have been used in the past and what are the benefits of those tools and
approaches? What has worked well and not worked well?
Answer: more specifics are required to be able to answer this question. This can be
discussed at the study session.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
None.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
None.
Attachments: Project History - Public Works and Inspections
Project History - Parks and Recreation
` City Change Order Procedure
Parks and Recreation Department bids and change orders
Example Project Estimate - Public Works
Prepared by: Mike Rardin, Public Works Director
Tom Scott, City Attorney
Reviewed by: Cindy Walsh, Parks and Recreation Director
Brian Hoffman, Inspections Director
Approved by: Nancy Deno Gohman, Deputy City Manager/HR Director
Contract TypeCity Council ( Const./Maint/Final Acceptance / Supplies/ServicesContract Award Payment Line #DeptProject #Contract #Prof Serv. )DateDateContractorProj MgrDescription of WorkLocationContract Cost2nd Bid AmountFinal Cost% VarianceLiq Damages# CO' or SA's$ for CO' or SA'sWD AllowedWD UsedReq'd Completion DateSubst. Completion DateFinal Completion Date169168 PW 2010-2200 127-10 Aug. 16, 2010 Visu-Sewer Clean & Seal MFSanitary Sewer - Mainline Rehabilitation $153,581.50 $168,155.50 April 30, 2011167 PW 2010-0003 100-10 Maintenance June 21, 2010 01/03/2011 Ron Kassa Construction MFSidewalk Maint. Project - Annual Repairs $116,190.00 $139,060.00 $130,131.97 12.0% 30 24 Sept. 7, 2010166 2010-0004 MaintenanceStreet Maint. Project - Annual C & G Repairs165 2010-0006 MaintenanceStorm Water Project - Annual CB Repairs164 PW 2008-1400 12-10 Construction January 19, 2010 12/20/2010 Magney Construction, Inc. JOWater Project - WTP #1 Filter Rehabilitation $857,400.00 $888,888.88$869,771.85 1.4%May 18, 2010 May 27, 2010 November 2, 2010163 PW 2009-1101 75-10 Construction May 17, 2010 12/20/2010 Valley Paving, Inc.TPStreet Project - MSA Street Rehab (Area 6) - Wooddale Ave$137,890.60 $147,286.20$145,912.71 5.8%1$1,840.00 3024Sept. 14, 2010162 PW 2010-0001 110-10 Maintenance July 6, 2010 12/06/2010 Allied Blacktop CompanyJOStreet Mt Proj - Sealcoat Streets (Area 2)$259,281.40 $277,855.32$238,292.66 -8.1%1$3,657.50 105Sept. 8, 2010161 PW 2008-1101 122-09 Construction September 21, 2009 12/06/2010 Valley Paving, Inc.MFStreet Project - MSA Street Rehab (Area 5) - Texas Ave (Hwy 7 to $108,825.75 $112,868.55$108,570.44 -0.2%1$9,638.30 1717Oct. 29, 2009160 PW 2009-1100 72-09 Construction June 15, 2009 12/06/2010 Valley Paving, Inc.TPStreet Project - MSA Street Rehab (Area 6) - Alabama Ave$631,912.26 $669,113.76$629,379.46 -0.4%3$1,978.40 6040.5Sept. 17, 2009159 PW 2010-2300 28-10 Construction March 10, 2010 11/01/2010 Weber Electric (By Memo) TKDA/JOSanitary Sewer Proj. - LS #19 Generator & Controls$67,200.00 $80,284.00$68,223.00 1.5%Sept. 1, 2010Aug. 2, 2010Sept. 1, 2010158 PW 2007-1101 72-08 Construction June 2, 2008 10/18/2010 Valley Paving, Inc.Street Project - Park Place Blvd$4,038,465.97 $4,121,561.33$4,264,882.01 5.6%July 15, 2009157 PW 2009-2101 86-09 Construction July 6, 2009 03/15/2010 Valley Paving, Inc.SRF/MFTraffic Signal Project - W36th St @ Park Center Blvd.$143,732.25 $153,049.80$149,329.83 3.9%October 16, 2009 October 14, 2009Dec. 1, 2009156 PW 2009-0003 85-09 Maintenance July 6, 2009 03/01/2010 Ron Kassa ConstructionMFSidewalk Maint. Project - Annual Repairs$219,653.75 $233,281.25$149,259.90 -32.0%2523Sept. 17, 20091552009-0004 Street Maint. Project - Annual C & G Repairs1542009-0006 Storm Water Project - Annual CB Repairs153 PW 2007-1500 80-08 Construction June 2, 2008 02/16/2010 Odland Protective Coatings, Inc.SMWater Project - Recoat Elevated Water Tower #4$874,000.00 $911,000.00$853,418.00 -2.4% See commentnana October 26, 2008naJune 8, 2009152 PW 2009-2300 83-09 Construction July 6, 2009 12/07/2009 G.L. Contracting, Inc.MFSanitary Sewer Proj. - LS #17 & FM Rehab$67,566.50 $74,414.86$74,351.97 10.0%2018Sept. 7, 2009151 PW 2009-0001 82-09 Maintenance July 6, 2009 11/16/2009 Allied Blacktop CompanyJOStreet Mt Proj - Sealcoat Streets (Area 1)$294,202.49 $296,137.44$312,030.24 6.1%107Aug. 19, 2009150 PW 2008-0003 73-08 Maintenance June 2, 2008 03/02/2009 Concrete Idea, Inc.MFSidewalk Maint. Project - Annual Repairs$104,754.00 $123,530.00$139,691.25 33.4%2525Aug. 25, 20081492008-0004 Street Maintenance Project - Annual C & G Repairs1482009-0004 Street Maintenance Project - Annual C & G Repairs147 PW 2009-2000 99-08 Construction August 4, 2008 07/27/2009 Electrical Installation & Maint. Co. JOTraffic Signal Project - Louisiana Ave @ Oxford St$373,600.00 $382,050.00$382,308.49 2.3%November 1, 2008 Feb. 25, 2009Feb. 25, 20091462009-2100ConstructionTraffic Signal Project - Louisiana Ave @ Louisiana Circle145 PW 2007-1000 40-08 Construction April 28, 2008 03/02/2009 Midwest Asphalt CorporationAOStreet Project - Local Street Rehab (Area 4)$1,348,674.24 $1,355,394.51$1,394,281.43 3.4%6563Sept. 24, 2008144 PW 2007-0003 87-07 Maintenance August 6, 2007 02/17/2009 Quality Restoration Services, Inc.MFSidewalk Maint. Project - Annual Repairs$116,976.70 $132,058.25$116,961.10 0.0%4537Oct. 22, 20071432007-0004MaintenanceStreet Maint. Project - Annual C & G Repairs1422007-2600MaintenanceStreet Project - W 36th Street Median Installation1412008-0004MaintenanceStreet Maint. Project - Annual C & G Repairs140 PW 2008-2300 120-08 Construction Sept. 17, 2008 02/02/2009 G.F. Jedlicki, Inc. (By Quote) TPSanitary Sewer Proj. - FM Rehab (Park Ctr Blvd)$35,445.00 $39,262.20$30,742.00 -13.3%1510Oct. 17, 2008139 PW 2004-0302 105-07 Construction Aug. 20, 2007 01/05/2009 DMJ CorporationMFTrail Improvement Project: Minnetonka Blvd. (TH 169 to Aquila Ave.) $237,960.15 $239,849.52$266,826.15 12.1%1$28,866.00 3531Nov. 28, 2007138 PW 2007-1100 59-08 Construction May 19, 2008 01/05/2009 Valley Paving, Inc.TPStreet Project - MSA Street Rehab$201,255.39 $205,839.05$194,379.92 -3.4%2522Sept. 17, 2008137 PW 2008-0001 88-08 Maintenance July 7, 2008 12/01/2008 Pearson Brothers, Inc.JOStreet Mt Proj - Sealcoat Streets (Area 8)$286,572.60 $338,113.07$274,547.60 -4.2%1$12,025.00 106Aug. 31, 2008136 PW 2004-0400 113-07 Supply October 15, 2007 10/06/2008 Carlo Lachmansingh Sales, Inc.JOStreet Improvement Project - Excelsior Boulevard (TH 100 to Dakota $424,189.50 No other bid$436,489.50 2.9%1$12,300.00 nanananaSept. 30, 2008135 PW 2005-1200 15-07 Construction Feb. 20, 2007 08/04/2008 Gridor ConstructionBarr/SMSanitary Sewer Project - Lift Station Rehab @ Shelard$468,377.00 $468,660.00$504,666.00 7.7%5$36,289.00 221221June 16, 2008134 PW 2006-1000 37-07 Construction May 7, 2007 03/17/2008 Hardrives, Inc.AOStreet Project - Local Street Rehab (Area 3)$1,792,999.55 $1,829,183.14$1,975,081.63 10.2%3$67,613.64 8075Sept. 24, 20071332006-1100ConstructionStreet Project - MSA Street Rehab (Area 3) - W16th Street1322007-1400ConstructionWater Project - Watermain Replacement131 PW 2006-1101 51-07 Construction May 21, 2007 03/17/2008 Midwest Asphalt CorporationTPStreet Project - MSA Street Rehab (Area 3) - Dakota Ave$625,674.09 $642,367.30$672,611.01 7.5%1-3$32,065.85 5555Sept. 14, 20071302006-1102ConstructionStreet Project - MSA Street Rehab (Area 3) - W38th Street129PW2007-220074-07 Construction June 18, 2007 03/03/2008 Insituform TechnologiesJPSanitary Sewer Project - Mainline Rehab (PMP Area #3)$157,788.00 $160,845.00$170,900.00 8.3%2515Nov. 8, 2007128 PW 2007-0001 82-07 Maintenance July 16, 2007 02/19/2008 Pearson Brothers, Inc.JSStreet Mt Proj - Sealcoat Streets (Area 7)$197,586.45 $281,158.33$188,150.01 -4.8%1($1,000.00)1010Jan. 23, 2008127 PW 2007-2500 110-07 Construction Oct. 1, 2007 02/19/2008 Kevitt ExcavatingTPStorm Water Project - City Hall Parking Lot$77,464.00 $77,571.00$104,609.66 35.0%1$33,301.00 2020Nov. 17, 2007126 PW 2009-1200 09-07 Construction Feb. 5, 2007 10/15/2007 EnComm Midwest, Inc.SMWater Project - WTP #16 Filter Rehabilitation$402,994.00 $454,200$402,994.00 0.0% $0.00nanaMay 31, 2007na06/18/2007125 PW 2005-1500 118-05 Construction Sept. 6, 2005 09/17/2007 Total Construction & Equipment, Inc. SMWater Project - Back-up Power Supply$553,740.00 $595,000.00$618,920.00 11.8% $0.001$65,180.00 nanaMay 15, 2007May 1, 2007May 15, 2006124 PW 2004-1301 13-05 Construction January 18, 2005 08/20/2007 EnComm Midwest, Inc.SEAWater Improvement Project - WTP #4 Filter Rehabilitation$188,188.00 $218,700.00$188,188.00 0.0% $0.00nanaApril 29, 2005naAug. 31, 2005123 PW 2004-0301 121-06 Construction Oct. 3, 2006 06/18/2007 Jay BrothersMFTrail Improvement Project: Trail Connections$59,322.50 $62,068.00$61,150.30 3.1%1$2,430.00 3030Dec. 4, 2006122 PW 2005-1100 83-06 Construction June 19, 2006 04/09/2007 Hardrives, Inc.AOStreet Project - MSA Street Rehab (Area 2)$312,860.60 $333,910.20$323,044.62 3.3%2$7,402.90 1826Sept. 7, 2006121 PW 2005-1000 50-06 Construction April 17, 2006 04/09/2007 Hardrives, Inc.AOStreet Project - Local Street Rehab (Area 2)$910,880.70 $930,349.19$886,760.96 -2.6%1$8,338.20 4537Aug. 21, 2006120 PW 2006-0005 113-06 Maintenance Sept. 18, 2006 02/05/2007 Concrete Idea, Inc.MFSidewalk Maint. Project - Annual Repairs$71,880.50 $73,366.70$76,512.46 6.4%3030Nov. 7, 2006119 PW 2006-0003 81-06 Maintenance June 5, 2006 02/05/2007 Concrete Idea, Inc.MFSidewalk Maint. Project - Annual Repairs$60,833.90 $63,654.50$85,791.06 41.0%2$17,090.60 2525Aug. 31, 20061182006-0004MaintenanceStreet Maint. Project - Annual C & G Repairs117 PW 2004-0100 38-05 Construction May 2, 2005 09/05/2006 Ron Kassa ConstructionBTSidewalk Improvement Project-Pedestrian Curb Ramps$176,331.55 $183,407.45$253,132.87 43.6%3$47,295.30 3029July 14, 2005116 PW 2005-1800 39-06 Construction April 3, 2006 09/05/2006 Concrete Idea, Inc.AOAlley Project - 2900 block of Ottawa Ave to Princeton Ave$40,569.00 $41,400.00$40,106.20 -1.1%1514May 19, 2006115 PW 2004-0303 91-05 Construction July 18, 2005 09/05/2006 Park Construction CompanyTKDA Trail Improvement Project: Connection at Cedar Lake Road$147,663.36 $161,654.30$157,667.82 6.8%1$3,000.00 114 PW 2004-1000 39-05 Construction May 2, 2005 08/07/2006 Frattalone PavingAOStreet Improvement Projects - Local Street Rehab (Area 1)$1,175,117.75 $1,220,912.80$1,207,608.86 2.8%1$60,309.99 5048113 PW 2004-1100 77-05 Construction June 20, 2005 02/21/2006 Valley Paving, Inc.TPStreet Improvement Projects - MSA Street Rehab (Area 1)$843,724.12 $851,326.04$800,576.41 -5.1%3$12,865.43 5057Oct. 14, 2005112PW2005-0004 121-05 Maintenance Sept. 30, 2005 02/21/2006 Ron Kassa Construction (By Quote) AOStreet Maint. Project - Annual C & G Repairs$26,585.00 $29,953.35$59,872.40 125.2%1511Nov. 17, 2005111 PW 2005-0003 123-05 Maintenance Sept. 30, 2005 01/03/2006 Ron Kassa ConstructionAOSidewalk Maintenance Project-Annual Repairs$30,822.90 $32,740.44$34,749.10 12.7%1510Nov. 7, 2005110 PW 2004-0003 86-04 Maintenance Sept. 7, 2004 11/07/2005 Ti-Zack Concrete, Inc.LAMSidewalk Maintenance Project-Annual Repairs$58,851.50 $66,467.25$61,014.50 3.7%Oct. 4, 2005109 PW 2004-0300 93-04 Construction Sept. 20, 2004 11/07/2005 Hardrives, Inc.TPTrail Improvement Project-"Other" Segments$105,623.55 $117,264.10$112,776.17 6.8%2$2,674.37 3025Aug. 19, 2005108 PW 2004-1400 68-04 Construction July 20, 2004 02/07/2005 Thomas and Sons Construction, Inc. AOWater Improvement Project-Main Replacements, Elmwood Area$318,707.39 $349,888.98$340,185.46 6.7%3535107 PW 2004-1200 101-04 Construction Oct. 8, 2004 02/07/2005 Hardrives, Inc.TPStreet Improvement Project-Closure at Railroad CrossingsBrunswick Ave$19,806.20 $24,245.00$21,675.20 9.4%3010Nov. 15, 2004106 PW 2003-1500 72-04 Construction July 19, 2004 12/06/2004 BCG Construction, Inc. BTAlley Improvement Project-Edgebrook Drive7600/7700 Edgebrook Ave.$29,686.60 $32,182.50$25,841.50 -13.0%1514.5Sept. 16, 2004105 PW 2004-1900 95-04 Maintenance Sept. 27, 2004 12/06/2004 Standard Sidewalk, Inc.LAMStreet Maintenance Project-Curb & Gutter InstallationVirginia Ave & W. 22nd St.$21,871.75 $26,589.00$31,917.00 45.9%1510Nov. 11, 2004104 PW 2003-1100 127-03 Construction Oct. 7, 2003 11/15/2004 BCG Construction, Inc.BTSidewalk Improvement Project-Park Commons Drive$92,966.90 $105,644.00$82,114.03 -11.7%1$3,740.00 5042June 24, 2004103 PW 2004-0200 46-04 Construction May 17, 2004 11/01/2004 Standard Sidewalk, Inc.TPSidewalk Improvement Project-"Other" Segments$110,550.25 $119,682.78$105,861.05 -4.2%3025.5Sept. 1, 2004102 PW 2004-0004 64-04 Maintenance June 25, 2004 09/20/2004 Ron Kassa ConstructionAOStreet Maintenance Project-Annual Curb & Gutter Repairs$12,880.00 $16,897.00$18,928.25 47.0%159101 PW 2000-0300 111-03 Construction September 15, 2003 08/16/2004 Hulegaard ConstructionWSBFlood Improvement Project - Area #1 (Ford & Runnymede)Runnymeade L. & Dahl Prop.$125,000.00 $135,811.00$139,557.00 11.6%4545November 15, 20031002003-0500Construction Flood Improvement Project - Area #2 (9311 Franklin)99 PW 2003-0600 138-03 Maintenance Oct. 28, 2003 07/19/2004 Ron Kassa ConstructionAOSidewalk Maintenance Project - Annual Repairs (2003)$31,132.00 $38,420.80$47,863.40 53.7%201398 PW 2003-0100 94-03 Construction Aug. 18, 2003 07/19/2004 O'Malley Construction, Inc.AOSidewalk Improvement Project-Year 2003$268,936.35 $294,293.80$284,499.63 5.8%3030Oct. 21, 2003972003-0200ConstructionTrails Improvement Project-Year 200396 PW 2003-0700 122-03 Maintenance Sept. 8, 2003 12/01/2003 Ron Kassa ConstructionDJStreet Maintenance Project - Annual Curb & Gutter Repairs (2003)$11,838.75 $15,457.40$15,399.70 30.1%155Oct. 27, 200395 PW 2002-0800 133-02 Maintenance Nov. 12, 2002 11/17/2003 Ron Kassa ConstructionDJSidewalk Random Repairs - City Wide$34,063.50 $37.371.50$49,708.13 45.9%251394 PW 2003-0900 87-03 Construction July 21, 2003 11/17/2003 Ron Kassa ConstructionAOAlley Improvement Project-2700 block of Raleigh/Salem Ave$44,783.75 $47,998.00$37,325.15 -16.7%3030Sept. 22, 2003932003-1000Alley Improvement Project-2900 block of Salem/Toledo Ave$53,170.00 $56,548.00$46,999.05 -11.6%92 PW 1999-0700B 78-02 Construction June 3, 2002 07/21/2003 Thomas and Sons Construction, Inc. AOSidewalk Improvement Project - Year 2001 (B)$583,444.84 No other bid$616,485.36 5.7%4040Aug. 22, 200291 PW 1999-0500 66-02SupplyMay 6, 2002 02/03/2003 MN Electric Supply CompanyBTStreet Improvement Project - Excelsior Blvd (Quentin to Monterey) - Excelsior Blvd, Phase III$346,574.43 $351,987.83$345,167.23 -0.4%nanaJuly 1, 2003naAug. 30, 200290 PW 2001-0400 35-02 Construction April 15, 2002 01/03/2005 Hardrives, Inc.Traffic Signal - Excelsior Blvd from Quentin to Monterey / W 38th$1,766,900.35 $1,869,129.43 $2,004,652.17 13.5%3July 1, 2003July 1, 200389 PW 2002-1000 37-02 Construction April 15, 2002 09/17/2002 Tjader & HighstromMHWatermain Bursting - Excelsior Between Princeton & KiplingExcelsior Boulevard$139,193.12 $179,500.00$152,754.22 9.7%1$13,561.10 1523June 13, 200288 PW 2001-0300 100-02 Construction July 16, 2002 11/04/2002 Electrical Installation & Maint. Co. DJEVP - Minnetonka Blvd/France - 33rd/Texas$30,600.00 $65,640.00$30,600.00 0.0%2515Sept. 30, 2002872002-0500ConstructionEVP - Park Pl Blvd&I-394 Ramp/Cdr Lake Rd&Th 169 Ramp/Ford Rd&Shelard Pkwy 86 PW2002-120084-02 Construction June 17, 2002 10/07/2002 Ron Kassa Construction DJAlley Paving: Toledo - Utica$46,040.00 $58,346.00$60,655.12 31.7% 30 15 Aug. 4, 2002852002-0700MaintenanceC & G/Street Repairs - Random - City Wide84 PW2002-090085-02 Construction Aug. 1, 2002 10/07/2002 F.F. Jedlicki, Inc.TPStorm Sewer Wolfe Park$48,789.60 $64,780.00$45,510.10 -6.7%106Sept. 16, 200283 PW2000-150044-01 Construction May 7, 2001 09/17/2002 Midwest Asphalt CorporationTPStreet Reconstruction Project - Zarthan Ave (W 16th St to I-394)$386,057.60 $413,609.69$414,914.90 7.5%1$2,950.00 9080Sept. 3, 2002822000-1600ConstructionStreet Improvement Project - W 16th St (Zarthan West)812001-1200ConstructionTraffic Signal Project - Signal Zarthan (@ W 16th St)80 PW1999-0700A100-01 Construction Sept. 24, 2001 08/19/2002 Standard Sidewalk, Inc.AOSidewalk Improvement Project - Year 2001 (A)$187,026.30 $194,268.50$158,611.90 -15.2%5035May 20, 200279 PW2001-0200102-01 Maintenance Sept. 24, 2001 08/05/2002 Ron Kassa ConstructionDJSidewalk & Trails - Random - City Wide$61,979.75 $69,059.20$76,656.55 23.7%2515Dec. 7, 200178 PW2001-1700103-01 Construction Sept. 24, 2001 02/19/2002 Ron Kassa ConstructionTPBus pullout & sidewalk - La. Ave @ 28th St (SAP 163-276-33)$80,693.00 $96,408.65$84,302.00 4.5%3017Nov. 8, 200177 PW2001-130047-01 Construction May 21, 2001 11/19/2001 F.F. Jedlicki, Inc.WSBFlood Improvement Project - Area #3 (8911 Westmoreland Lane)Lane$60,044.00 No other bid$58,664.00 -2.3%4529Oct. 18, 200176 PW 2001-1800 89-01 Construction Aug. 20, 2001 11/05/2001 Ron Kassa ConstructionAOAlley Improvement -2700 Block of Brunswick Ave/CP Railroad$48,349.50 $48,770.00$56,491.97 16.8%3018Oct. 3, 200175 PW 2000-0700 111-01 Construction Oct. 3, 2001 06/02/2003 S.M. Hentges & SonsWSB Flood Improvement Project - Area #15 (33rd/Dakota & 33rd/Colorado)$1,559,418.75 $1,696,164.85 $1,653,621.05 6.0%320320Sept. 1, 2002742001-0800ConstructionStorm Sewer - W 33rd & Texas Ave - Area 13B732001-0900ConstructionStorm Sewer - 4027 & 4031 Yosemite Ave - Area 1972 PW 2001-0100 74-01 Maintenance June 18, 2001 10/15/2001 Ron Kassa ConstructionDJC & G / Random - City Wide$30,269.40 $42,086.85$29,472.21 -2.6%2510Aug. 18, 200171 PW 2000-0200 71-00 Construction July 5, 2000 09/04/2001 Thomas and Sons Construction, Inc. AOFlood Improvement Project - Area #12 (2920 Maryland)$185,654.96 $189,899.30$197,866.38 6.6%3535Oct. 31, 2000702000-0400ConstructionFlood Improvement Project - Area #17 (3363 Zarthan)692000-0600ConstructionFlood Improvement Project - Area #11 (Nelson Park)68 PW 2001-1100 43-01 Maintenance May 7, 2001 09/04/2001 Allied Blacktop CompanyDJStreet Chipseal Various Locations$68,260.65 $70,350.71$75,390.93 10.4%104July 26, 200167 PW 2000-1300 82-00 Construction Sept. 5, 2000 08/06/2001 Electrical Installation & Maint. Co. TPTraffic Signal Improvement Project - Louisiana (W 29th to BNRR)$60,724.60 $63,845.50$55,806.68 -8.1%5050July 27, 200166PW1998-1600 74-00 construction July 5, 2000 08/06/2001 Nadeau Utility, Inc.BTEntrance Signs - Park Place Blvd / I-394$37,351.00 no other bids$37,660.00 0.8%Sept. 29, 2000July 27, 200165 PW 2001-1600 48-01 Construction Dec. 5, 2001 07/02/2001 F.F. Jedlicki, Inc.BTStorm Sewer Project (W 31st/Aquila)Relocation at 3043 Aquila A$10,002.00 $11,910.00$10,002.00 0.0%101June 7, 200164 PW 2000-0800 84-00 Construction Aug. 29, 2000 02/20/2001 Electrical Installation & Maint. Co. TPTraffic Signal Improvement Project - EVP (PPB @ I-394; W36th St @ $14,476.00 $19,295.00$14,476.00 0.0%2525Feb. 7, 200163 PW 2000-0900 85-00 Maintenance Sept. 5, 2000 12/04/2000 Ti-Zack Concrete, Inc.DJSidewalk Maintenance Project - Random Repairs (2000)City-wide$49,679.70 $53,158,80$63,179.70 27.2%1$13,500.00 3023Nov. 1, 200062 PW 2000-2000 87-00 Construction Sept. 18, 2000 12/04/2000 Ron Kassa ConstructionAOAlley Improvement Project - Paving (3200 Block - Georgia to Hampshire)$37,277.50 No other bid$41,053.05 10.1%1512Nov 2, 200061 PW 2000-0500 77-00 Construction Aug. 7, 2000 11/06/2000 F.F. Jedlicki, Inc.AOFlood Improvement Project - Area #2 (9311 Franklin)$59,015.00 $66,708.00$58,963.71 -0.1%2214Sept. 28, 200060 PW 1998-1500 54-99 construction July 6, 1999 10/02/2000 Nadeau Utility, Inc.BTEntrance Signs - La. Ave/I-394 (SW & SE) Hwy 7 / Blake Rd SE$158,096.39 $158,793.50 $156,441.58 -1.0%$4,000.00 Aug. 20, 1999naSept. 22, 200059 PW 2000-1200 45-00 Maintenance April 21, 0000 10/02/2000 Valley Rich Co., Inc.SEASanitary Sewer Maintenance Project - Manhole/Pipe (Princeton Ave)$9,870.00 $12,642.00$9,870.00 0.0%203June 3, 200058 PW 2000-0100 48-00 Maintenance May 15, 2000 09/05/2000 Ti-Zack Concrete, Inc.DJStreet Maintenance Project - Random C&G Repair (2000)City-wide$26,275.70 $29,948.75$27,449.07 4.5%2011Aug. 4, 200057 PW 2000-1100 52-00 Maintenance May 15, 2000 08/07/2000 Bituminous RoadwaysDJStreet Maintenance Project - Chipseals (2000) Elmwood, Brooklawns & $59,237.78 $61,532.22$63,076.86 6.5%102July 7, 200056 PW n/a 32-00 Emergency May 8, 2000 08/07/2000 Lametti & Sons, Inc.SEAEmergency watermain repair$34,224.17 $34,224.17 0.0%June 26, 200055 PW n/a 20-99Supply May 17, 1999 08/07/2000 Calgon Carbon CorporationSEAGAC Replacement$52,786.00 $52,786.00 0.0%nanananaJuly 18, 200054 PW 1998-0500 18-99 Construction May 3, 1999 02/07/2000 Killmer Electric Co., Inc.BTTraffic Signal EVP - Texas Ave @ W 36th & Beltline Blvd & W 36th $16,133.00 $16,590.00$16,133.00 0.0%2525August 9, 199953 PW 1997-2200 19-99 construction May 17,1999 02/07/2000 Valley Paving, Inc.AOWatermain Replacement - Ford Rd from I-394 Frontage Rd to Ford Ln$318,447.65 $341,142.30$296,629.09 -6.9%1$2,114.31 4040Aug. 20, 199952 1999-0100ConstructionMill & Overlay - Ford Rd from Ford Ln to I-394 N Srvc Rd51 PW 1999-0600 59-99 Construction Sept. 7, 1999 12/06/1999 Thomas and Sons Construction, Inc. TPStorm Sewer - Wooddale/W 42nd Street$90,661.75 $102,367.30$93,304.75 2.9%2020Nov. 12, 199950 PW 1999-0400 58-99 Maintenance Sept. 7, 1999 12/06/2009 Standard Sidewalk, Inc.DJSidewalk - Random RepairsCity-wide$70,381.00 $82,989.25$62,132.84 -11.7%2015Nov. 15, 1999Project History - Public Works and Inspections1996 thru 12/31/2010G:\Pubwks\Agendas\Study Sessions\2011 - Current\01-January\01-24-11\Bid Report\Project History - Public Works and Inspections.xlsSheet1Study Session Meeting of January 24, 2011 (Item No. 3) Subject: Bidding and Construction/Project ManagementPage 6
Contract TypeCity Council ( Const./Maint/Final Acceptance / Supplies/ServicesContract Award Payment Line #DeptProject #Contract #Prof Serv. )DateDateContractorProj MgrDescription of WorkLocationContract Cost2nd Bid AmountFinal Cost% VarianceLiq Damages# CO' or SA's$ for CO' or SA'sWD AllowedWD UsedReq'd Completion DateSubst. Completion DateFinal Completion DateProject History - Public Works and Inspections1996 thru 12/31/201049 PW 1998-1400 57-99 Construction Sept. 7, 1999 12/06/1999 Kevitt ExcavatingTP/JAPark Commons Demo - RestorationPark Commons $172,891.00 $178,680.00$205,112.30 18.6%2$32,221.30 6060Nov. 15, 199948 PW n/a 16-99 maintenance12/06/1999 AstechJSStreet Chipseal Various Locations$44,785.24 $54,980.88 22.8%nanananaJuly 15, 199947 PW 1999-0200 47-99 maintenance May 28, 1999 09/07/1999 Scandy Concrete, Inc.DJRandom Concrete/C&G RepairsCity-wide$11,677.20 $11,822.60$11,553.24 -1.1%208Aug. 12, 199946 PW 1998-1200 21-99 construction May 10, 1999 08/02/1999 Hardrives, Inc.DJMill & Overlay/C&G Repair - Parkdale Dr from Park Pl Blvd to TH 100 $24,964.50 $29,495.00$42,614.75 70.7%157June 29, 199945 PW 1998-0800 51-98 maintenance Aug. 3, 1998 07/05/1999 Lead Con, Inc.TKDAWater Reservoir #2 - 4241 W 42nd @ Zarthan - Recoating - Repairs$218,560.00 $264,395.60 21.0%2$45,835.60 May 28, 1999naMay 28, 199944 PW 1998-0600 47-98 construction July 20, 1998 04/05/1999 Thomas and Sons Construction, Inc. AOSidewalk/Street Lighting - Louisiana Ave from W 28th to Cul-de-Sac $85,144.00 $88,200.30$86,440.43 1.5%1$1,800.00 2017Sept. 11, 199843 PW 1998-0700 61-98 maintenance October 6, 1998 01/04/1999 Ron Kassa ConstructionDJSidewalk/C&G Random RepairsCity-wide$72,784.20 $91,330.75$80,993.15 11.3%2017Nov. 28, 199842 PW 1985-3200 17-98 construction April 20, 1998 12/07/1998 Midwest Asphalt CorporationAOChannelization Ford Rd & Betty Crocker Dr Intersection$468,620.10 $476,655.50$490,205.37 4.6%2$26,123.62 6565Aug. 13, 1998411987-2800constructionTraffic Signal - Shelard Pkwy & Ford Rd40 1997-0500constructionWatermain Replacement - Shelard Pk Ford Rd-Shelard Pkwy/FordLn39 PW 1996-1300 62-98 construction Oct. 15, 1998 12/07/1998 Visu-Sewer Clean & SealSEASanitary Sewer Repair / Replacement of MainJewish Community Center$68,600.00 $68,600.00 0.0%Nov. 6, 199838 PW 1994-2300 58-98 construction Sept. 22, 1998 12/07/1998 Ron Kassa Construction AOAlley Paving 3700 Block of France Ave & Glenhurst Ave $33,237.00 $36,965.00$33,716.33 1.4% 15 13 Oct. 29, 199837 PW 1997-0100 16-98 construction April 20, 1998 10/06/1998 Hardrives, Inc. TPPaving/C&G - W 35th St - Raleigh Ave W to Cul-de-sac $143,011.00 $153,922.29$169,042.90 18.2% 1$24,813.60 4040Aug. 13, 199836 1997-0200constructionMill & Overlay - W 36th St - Gettysburg to TH 16935 1997-0300constructionPaving/C&G - W 23rd St, W 24th St, Utica Ave 34 PW 1997-0700 37-98 maintenance July 7, 1998 10/06/1998 DMJ CorporationDJRandom Maint - BridgesCity-wide$18,077.94 $41,897.00$20,218.44 11.8%2014Sept. 11, 199833 PW 1998-0200 50-98 construction August 3, 1998 10/06/1998 Midwest Asphalt CorporationTPStreet Construction Median - Excelsior W of TH 100 to Methodist $129,828.60 $99,798.45 -23.1%1($30,264.30)2014Sept. 11, 199832 PW n/a 18-98 maintenance08/03/1998 Allied Blacktop CompanyGKSealcoat$38,240.27 $40,490.57 5.9%102July 2, 1998July 15, 199831 PW 1997-0600 19-98 maintenance April 21, 1998 08/03/1998 Ron Kassa ConstructionDJC & G Random RepairsCity-wide$7,179.90 $9,437.70$14,789.57 106.0%1$6,000.00 1510June 25, 199830 PW 1997-1600 4165 construction06/06/1998 Matt Bullock ConstructionBTTwin Lakes Park Fill RemovalTwins Lakes/Oak Park Village$74,109.75 $68,401.00 -7.7%2020May 27, 199829 PW 1996-2800 4200 maintenance05/04/1998 Independent Curb Contractors, Inc. DJSidewalk/C&G Random RepairsCity-wide$19,375.45 $31,879.97 64.5%2019Oct. 31, 199728 PW 1996-3300 4157 construction spring 1998 Valley Paving, Inc. AOWatermain Replacement - Shelard Pkwy - I-394 Svr Rd to Nathan Ln $191,370.96 $211,959.13 10.8%1$4,050.00 303027 1996-2700 constructionOverlay Mill & Overlay - Shelard Pkwy - I-394 Svr Rd to Nathan Ln 26 PW 1995-0700 4197 construction spring 1998 Midwest Asphalt DJTraffic Signal Rt Turn Lane 7 Signal - NW.SW 27th St & Louisiana Ave $96,562.55 $100,940.16 4.5% 25 25 Oct. 10, 199725 PW 1996-3600 4203 construction 01/05/1998 Killmer Electric Co., Inc. BPTraffic Signal EVP - W 36th St @ TH 100 Ramp & Park Ctr Blvd $26,613.00 $26,613.00 0.0% 1Time Extension27 25 Nov. 10, 199724 PW 1996-1800 4151 construction fall 1997 TMI Coatings, Inc. SEAReservoir Roofing - WTP #12936 Idaho Ave$223,000.00 $223,000.00 0.0%Sept. 17, 1997 Sept. 17, 199723 PW 1996-3000 4171 construction 11/24/1997 Midwest Asphalt, Inc. TPPaving/C&G/Trails/Sidewalk Cedar Lake Rd / Park Pl Blvd to Th 100 E CLRoad/ Parkdale-Quentin$299,521.35 $299,121.62 -0.1%2$6,237.85 6051Oct. 3, 199722 PW 1997-1800 4199 construction fall 1997 Ron Kassa Construction AOAlley Paving - 2900 Block Natchez & Ottawa Aves $40,906.00 $40,445.70 -1.1% 20 17 Oct. 17, 199721 PW 1997-2000 4204 maintenancefall 1997 Ron Kassa ConstructionAOSidewalk - Random RepairsCity-wide$45,513.65 $45,426.75 -0.2%2521Nov. 10, 199720 PW 1995-1100 4024 constructionfall 1997 Friedges Landscaping, Inc.BTLandscaping Excel / W 36th - Monterey - Park Ctr - Quentin$508,176.57 $559,154.09 10.0%5,100.00$ 1$16,994.20 fall 1995June 1, 199619 PW 1996-0500 4196 maintenancefall 1997 Progressive Contractors, Inc.DJBridge Maintenance36th Street & Minnehaha Ck $22,177.00 $28,249.00 27.4%159Sept. 22, 199718 PW 1990-5100 4057 constructionfall 1997 Midwest Asphalt CorporationOSMPaving Cedar Lake Dr from TH 169 to Jersey Ave, RR-PhII$1,398,600.40 $1,677,463.93 19.9%4$176,622.79 9592Nov. 18, 199617 PW 1994-1300 4089 constructionfall 1997 Valley Paving, Inc.BTWatermain Replacement - Shelard Pkwy 310' W of Ford Rd & Ford Rd $156,286.00 $187,420.15 19.9%1$23,431.32 2525Nov. 11, 199716 1996-0400constructionOverlay Mill & Overlay - Shelard Pkwy - Ford Rd to Nathan Ln15 PW 1993-2200 4168 constructionfall 1997 DMJ CorporationAOParking Lot Paving - 5005 Minnetonka Blvd - City Hall E Parking Lot City Hall$24,329.30 $24,092.54 -1.0%2012Aug 6, 199714 PW 1997-1900 4169 constructionfall 1997 DMJ CorporationAOParking Lot Paving - Zarthan Water ReservoirW. 42nd Street & Zarthan$22,739.00 $27,126.24 19.3%1$27,126.24 2012Aug 6, 199713 PW 1997-1700 4195 constructionfall 1997 Scandy Concrete, Inc.BTElmwood Analysis - Zone 1 Elmwood Analysis Elmwood Area$94,378.54 $99,052.55 5.0%3030Oct. 7, 199712 PW 1990-5100 4027 constructionsummer 1997 C.S. McCrossan ConstructionOSMPaving Cedar Lake Dr from TH 169 to Jersey Ave, RR-PhII$2,555,622.75 $2,611,793.15 2.2%2$141,895.75 Nov. 10, 1995July 1, 1996July 3, 199611 PW 1996-1600 4083 constructionsummer 1997 Universal Applicators, Inc.SEARe-Coating Reservoir #1 - W 29th & Idaho2936 Idaho Ave$246,838.00 $215,785.40 -12.6% 1($30,575.00)July 31, 1997July 31, 199710 PW 1997-1500 4153 constructionsummer 1997 T.L. Stevens Well Company, Inc. SEAReconditioning - 2012 Flag Ave (Well #16)2012 Flag Ave (Well #16)$29,320.00 $32,454.90 10.7%1$5,273.90 June 3, 1997June 3, 19979 PW 1996-0300 4091 maintenancesummer 1997 Ron Kassa ConstructionDJSidewalk/C&G Random RepairsCity-wide$23,688.30 $23,688.30 0.0%2011June 23, 19978 PW 1990-3700 4088 construction summer 1997 NW Asphalt, Inc. TPPaving TH 7 N&S Frontage Rd from Texas to Quebec$265,555.75 $273,960.67 3.2%3$8,404.92 3533May 20, 19977 1996-0200construction Paving/Grading Th 169 E Svr Rd from 22nd to 23rd St6 PW 1995-0600 4035 construction03/03/1997 NW Asphalt, Inc.Paving/C&G Ford Rd Between RunnyMead to I-394 S Service Rd2$33,065.31 Aug 15, 1995Aug. 15, 1995June 30, 19965 PW 1990-4200 4061 constructionfall 1996 Lametti & Sons, Inc.DJSanitary Sewer - Forcemain RepairExcelsior @ Al's Liquor$95,510.00 $97,649.00 2.2%1$18,422.59 3030Oct. 19964 PW 1995-1000 4023 construction11/04/1996 Ridgedale ElectricBTStreet Lighting Excel Blvd from Quentin to Park Ctr/Park Ctr from Excel $101,211.75 $99,746.32 -1.4%2$18,287.08 19963 PW 1990-3200 4030 construction07/26/1996 Midwest AsphaltAOPaving Aquila from TH 7 to 460' S W 36th St$304,903.77 $316,968.77 4.0%2$12,065.00 19962 PW 1993-1700 4045 construction07/26/1996 Hardrives, Inc.TPChannelization/Alignment Hwy 7 & Beltline BlvdHighway 7/Belt Line Blvd$348,450.42 $356,861.00 2.4%3$8,662.60 19961 PW 1994-1700 4044 construction07/26/1996 Thomas and Sons Construction, Inc. BTDesign Intersection - W 38th St / Monterey - Excelsior Blvd$190,119.70 $200,514.66 5.5%2$13,993.10 1996 3 INSP 2008-2700 100-08 Maintenance August 4, 2008 11/13/2009 J. Carlson & SonsJACity Hall Exterior and Landscaping $108,775.00 $127,167.00 $112,707.00 0.3%May 1, 20092 INSP 2008-1300 07-07 Maintenance February 5, 2007 08/31/2007 Commercial RoofingJACity Hall Reroof$121,174.00 $127,998.00$121,174.00 0.0%September 1, 20071 INSP 2008-1900 079-09 Construction July 6, 2009Jorgenson ConsructionJARemodeling of MSC and Restoration of Creekside Park$8,164,000 $8,310,000.006$230,609.00 G:\Pubwks\Agendas\Study Sessions\2011 - Current\01-January\01-24-11\Bid Report\Project History - Public Works and Inspections.xlsSheet1Study Session Meeting of January 24, 2011 (Item No. 3) Subject: Bidding and Construction/Project ManagementPage 7
StatusContactProject NumberProject NameDept NamePriorityTotalYearExpensedCompletedCindy Walsh20022000Carpenter Park Tennis Court ReconstructionParks & Recreation1 Have to Do45,000.00$ 200254,062.50$ Asset #1557CompletedCindy Walsh20022070Wolfe Park EntranceParks & Recreation51,000.00$ 200252,136.15$ Asset #2168CompletedCindy Walsh20022570Junior High School Basketball StandardsParks & Recreation3 Smart to Do43,000.00$ 200243,000.00$ From JDECompletedCindy Walsh20022580Paul Frank Concession Stand & Building UpgradeParks & Recreation10,000.00$ 200212,250.00$ Asset #1065CompletedCindy Walsh20022600Nelson Park - Hockey Rink & In-line Skating RinkParks & Recreation50,000.00$ 200250,715.91$ CompletedCindy Walsh20022610, 2620Trail Reconstruction-Otten Pond & George HaunParks & Recreation1 Have to Do28,000.00$ 200224,873.00$ CompletedCindy Walsh20022640Playground EquipmentParks & Recreation1 Have to Do90,000.00$ 200291,497.61$ CompletedCindy Walsh20022650Basketball Court Resurface & StripingParks & Recreation1 Have to Do18,000.00$ 20025,467.00$ Is this Nelson? Asset #1053CompletedCindy Walsh20022660,20012080Louisiana Oaks Park ConstructionParks & Recreation1,900,000.00$ 20021,901,519.54$ CompletedCindy Walsh20022670Wolfe Park AmphitheaterParks & Recreation405,000.00$ 2002400,000.00$ JDE: "$80,000 to wrong project"CompletedCindy Walsh20022680Louisiana Oaks Building & Building designParks & Recreation492,000.00$ 2002496,126.88$ CompletedCindy Walsh20022710Westwood Hills Nature Center BoardwalkParks & Recreation100,000.00$ 200251,819.24$ CompletedCindy Walsh20022750City-Wide Public Art InitiativeParks & Recreation1 Have to Do-$ 200244,784.75$ CompletedCindy Walsh20022760Wolfe Park Soil CorrectionsParks & Recreation1 Have to Do239,500.00$ 20021,449.57$ Contractor paid differenctCompletedCindy Walsh/Rick Beane20033070Shelard Park ImprovementsParks & Recreation55,000.00$ 200355,204.92$ CompletedCindy Walsh20033080Skate Park EquipmentParks & Recreation70,000.00$ 200370,000.00$ From JDECompletedCraig Panning20033140Rec Center Roof ReplacementParks & Recreation1 Have to Do1,800,000.00$ 2003154,325.36$ CompletedCindy Walsh20033160Playground Equip.-Willow/Birchwood/Shelard/RoxburyParks & Recreation110,000.00$ 2003109,610.68$ CompletedCindy Walsh20044020Tennis & Basketball Court Sealcoating & StripingParks & Recreation11,500.00$ 20041,390.80$ CompletedCindy Walsh20044030Playground EquipmentParks & Recreation60,000.00$ 200490,325.85$ CompletedCindy Walsh20044070,4080,4100Oak Hill Park & Splash Pad improvementsParks & Recreation3 Smart to Do860,000.00$ 2004898,177.93$ CompletedCindy Walsh20044190Bass Lake/George Haun Trail ReconstructionParks & Recreation80,000.00$ 200481,513.96$ CompletedCindy Walsh20044200Ballfield Lights on Skippy Field (Carpenter Park)Parks & Recreation50,000.00$ 200351,503.75$ Total spent from JDE / Donations=expenseCompletedCindy Walsh20044210Edgebrook Park Basketball CourtParks & Recreation10,000.00$ 20044,563.00$ ActiveCindy Walsh20044230Ford Park RedevelopmentParks & Recreation1 Have to Do156,742.16$ 2004-2009156,742.16$ CompletedCindy Walsh; Rick Beane20050010Aquila Park Irrigation UpgradeParks & Recreation40,000.00$ 200522,032.83$ CompletedCindy Walsh; Rick Beane20050020Bass Lake & Dakota Parks Sun ShelterParks & Recreation30,000.00$ 200529,999.98$ CompletedCindy Walsh; Rick Beane20050030Bass Lake Park Tennis Court Resurface & StripingParks & Recreation16,000.00$ 200514,035.00$ CompletedCindy Walsh; Rick Beane20050040Browndale Park Basketball Court & TrailParks & Recreation20,000.00$ 200521,949.49$ CompletedCindy Walsh; Rick Beane20050050Cedar Knoll Park Parking Lot ReconstructionParks & Recreation1 Have to Do87,518.00$ 200574,404.68$ CompletedCindy Walsh; Rick Beane20050060Freedom Park / Paul Frank Field BuildingParks & Recreation25,000.00$ 200528,174.85$ CompletedCindy Walsh; Rick Beane20050070Nelson Park Trail, Parking Lot & Lighting UpgradeParks & Recreation55,000.00$ 200560,746.13$ CompletedCindy Walsh; Rick Beane20050080Northside Park Tennis Court ReconstructionParks & Recreation26,000.00$ 200528,165.00$ CompletedCindy Walsh; Rick Beane20050090Park Building ReplacementsParks & Recreation737,000.00$ 2005922,933.08$ CompletedCindy Walsh; Rick Beane20050110Playground Equipment ReplacementParks & Recreation3 Smart to Do90,000.00$ 200590,967.95$ CompletedCindy Walsh/Craig Panning20050120Rec Center Aquatic Park ConsultantParks & Recreation3 Smart to Do30,000.00$ 20052,320.00$ CompletedCindy Walsh/Craig Panning20050130Rec Center Generator ProjectParks & Recreation1 Have to Do280,000.00$ 200538,262.63$ CompletedMark Oestreich/Cindy Walsh20050140Westwood Hills Nature Center Brick House RepairsParks & Recreation1 Have to Do30,000.00$ 200526,735.00$ CompletedMark Oestreich/Cindy Walsh20050150Westwood Hills Nature Center Rental House RepairsParks & Recreation1 Have to Do35,000.00$ 200534,679.00$ CompletedMark Oestreich/Cindy Walsh20050160Westwood Hills Nature Center Wild Flower TrailParks & Recreation1 Have to Do16,000.00$ 200511,500.00$ CompletedCindy Walsh/Rick Beane20050170Off-Leash Dog ParkParks & Recreation9,100.00$ 20059,100.00$ CompletedCindy Walsh; Rick Beane20050180Lamplighter Park Trail ReconstructionParks & Recreation17,000.00$ 200522,875.65$ CompletedCraig Panning20050190Rec Center Restroom (4) RenovationParks & Recreation80,000.00$ 200578,712.86$ CompletedCindy Walsh; Rick Beane20052010Twin Lakes Park Basketball Crt - ResurfaceParks & Recreation3,000.00$ 20052,390.00$ JDECompletedCindy Walsh; Rick Beane20060010Aquila Park Building & Fence UpgradeParks & Recreation3 Smart to Do145,000.00$ 2006141,596.80$ CompletedCindy Walsh; Rick Beane20060020Basketball Court Overlay-Pennsylvania & MinikahdaParks & Recreation3 Smart to Do12,000.00$ 200628,475.49$ ActiveCindy Walsh/Rick Beane20060050Louisiana Oaks Trail ReconstructionParks & Recreation20,000.00$ 200619,600.00$ ActiveCindy Walsh; Rick Beane20060080Playground Equipment ReplacementParks & Recreation3 Smart to Do115,000.00$ 2006114,840.31$ ActiveCindy Walsh20060090Rec Center Entrance LandscapeParks & Recreation7,000.00$ 200616,935.00$ ActiveCindy Walsh/Craig Panning20060110Rec Center West Arena Refrig. Pipe Re-InsulationParks & Recreation3 Smart to Do15,000.00$ 200626,800.00$ ActiveCindy Walsh; Rick Beane20060150Sun Shelter AdditionParks & Recreation30,000.00$ 200630,872.50$ CompletedCindy Walsh20060160Westdale Park Trail Connection to Nature CenterParks & Recreation30,000.00$ 200628,752.64$ CompletedCindy Walsh20060180Westwood Hills Storage Building and ShelterParks & Recreation180,000.00$ 2006210,190.84$ CompletedCindy Walsh/Craig Panning20060190,3010Rec Center Aquatic Park Renovation & UmbrellasParks & Recreation100,000.00$ 2006102,374.50$ ActiveCindy Walsh; Rick Beane20062010Twin Lake Park Trail AdditionParks & Recreation4,500.00$ 20064,300.00$ CompletedCindy Walsh/Rick Beane20064010Louisiana Oaks Picnic AreaParks & Recreation3 Smart to Do5,000.00$ 2006-2007386.50$ CompletedCindy Walsh; Rick Beane20070010Ainsworth Park Sun ShelterParks & Recreation30,000.00$ 200717,185.28$ ActiveCindy Walsh20070020Aquila Park Field Fence (Field 2)Parks & Recreation45,000.00$ 200743,176.44$ CompletedCindy Walsh/Rick Beane20070040Louisiana Oaks Storage BuildingParks & Recreation20,000.00$ 2007, 2008, 2009, 201023,897.71$ CompletedCindy Walsh; Rick Beane20070050Cedar Knoll Park / Carlson Field Fence ReplacementParks & Recreation120,000.00$ 2007121,902.24$ ActiveCindy Walsh20070060,0070Junior High School Field Imp. & Lamplighter Pond TrailParks & Recreation120,000.00$ 2007127,348.07$ ActiveCindy Walsh/Rick Beane20070080Minikahda Vista Park Irrigation UpgradesParks & Recreation20,000.00$ 200721,949.95$ CompletedCindy Walsh20070110,0120Playground EquipmentParks & Recreation200,000.00$ 2007208,513.23$ CompletedCindy Walsh/Craig Panning20070130Rec Center Aquatic Park Equip RepairParks & Recreation30,000.00$ 200724,948.80$ ActiveCindy Walsh/Craig Panning20070140Rec Center Boiler RetubeParks & Recreation45,000.00$ 200743,972.00$ CompletedCindy Walsh/Craig Panning20070150Rec Center Parking Lot Repair & SealcoatParks & Recreation3 Smart to Do55,000.00$ 200746,290.00$ CompletedCindy Walsh; Rick Beane20070170Trail Recon.-Aquila, Carpenter Franklin & WalkerParks & Recreation107,000.00$ 200796,239.25$ CompletedMark Oestreich/Cindy Walsh20070180Westwood Hills Parking Lot & Trail OverlayParks & Recreation3 Smart to Do70,000.00$ 200772,257.94$ ActiveCindy Walsh/Rick Beane20080010Aquila Park Field Fence (Field 3)Parks & Recreation45,000.00$ 200854,979.95$ CompletedRick Birno/Cindy Walsh20080020Beehive Relocation to a Park, Phase IParks & Recreation50,000.00$ 200849,559.34$ ActiveCindy Walsh/Rick Beane20080040Carpenter Park Concession BuildingParks & Recreation40,000.00$ 200839,888.95$ ActiveCindy Walsh/Craig Panning20080060Energy AuditParks & Recreation6,000.00$ 20086,000.00$ ActiveCindy Walsh/Rick Beane20080070Fern Hill Park Redevelopment & Bldg ReplcmtParks & Recreation3 Smart to Do595,000.00$ 2008654,185.22$ ActiveCindy Walsh/Rick Beane20080090Jackley Park Basketball and Trail OverlayParks & Recreation15,000.00$ 200812,369.36$ CompletedCindy Walsh/Rick Beane20080110Off-Leash Dog Park Second LocationParks & Recreation15,000.00$ 20087,870.97$ CompletedCindy Walsh20080130Rec Center and Wolfe Park Amphitheater LandscapingParks & Recreation10,000.00$ 20089,995.00$ CompletedCindy Walsh/Rick Beane20080150Roxbury Park Basketball Court and TrailParks & Recreation7,500.00$ 20083,968.07$ CompletedCindy Walsh/Rick Beane20080170Sun Shelter Addition at Louisiana Oaks ParkParks & Recreation35,000.00$ 200837,270.55$ CompletedMark Oestreich/Cindy Walsh20080180Westwood Hills Front Electronic Entrance Gate/FnceParks & Recreation20,000.00$ 200819,435.07$ CompletedMark Oestreich/Cindy Walsh20080190Westwood Hills Picnic Shelter RestroomsParks & Recreation20,000.00$ 200822,564.44$ Study Session Meeting of January 24, 2011 (Item No. 3) Subject: Bidding and Construction/Project ManagementPage 8
CompletedMark Oestreich/Cindy Walsh20080200Westwood Hills Wood Stair ReplacementParks & Recreation20,000.00$ 200824,924.15$ CompletedCindy Walsh/Rick Beane20080210Playground Equipment ReplacementParks & Recreation70,000.00$ 200877,885.20$ CompletedCindy Walsh; Rick Beane20082010Justad Park Basketball Court ResurfaceParks & Recreation6,000.00$ 20084,842.49$ JDEActiveCindy Walsh/Craig Panning20090010Aquatic Park Sand/Water Play AreaParks & Recreation50,000.00$ 200942,390.64$ ActiveCindy Walsh/Rick Beane20090020,0030,0040Aquila Park Lighting,Fence, Parking Lot & Trail Recon. Parks & Recreation285,000.00$ 2009287,714.89$ ActiveRick Birno/Cindy Walsh20090050Beehive Restoration Project, Phase IIParks & Recreation60,000.00$ 200957,608.75$ ActiveCindy Walsh/Rick Beane20090060Bronx Park Field ImprovementsParks & Recreation15,000.00$ 200915,000.00$ ActiveCindy Walsh/Rick Beane20090090Carpenter Park Tennis Court ResurfaceParks & Recreation3 Smart to Do13,000.00$ 20097,590.00$ ActiveCindy Walsh/Rick Beane20090130Playground Equip Repl-Carpenter, Mdwbrk, ParkviewParks & Recreation3 Smart to Do90,000.00$ 200988,334.68$ ActiveCindy Walsh/Craig Panning20090140Rec Center West Arena Rubber Floor ReplacementParks & Recreation25,000.00$ 200918,534.26$ ActiveCindy Walsh/Rick Beane20090170Jersey Park Sun Shelter, Trail & BB Court ImprovParks & Recreation42,000.00$ 200940,527.93$ ActiveCindy Walsh/Rick Beane20090180Trail Mill & Overlay (Jordan & Keystone Parks)Parks & Recreation40,000.00$ 200933,625.00$ ActiveMark Oestreich/Cindy Walsh20090200Westwood Hills Perimeter Fence Replacement, Ph. IParks & Recreation40,000.00$ 200924,606.17$ ActiveCindy Walsh/Rick Beane20090210Aquila Park - Basketball CourtsParks & Recreation30,000.00$ 200939,373.42$ ActiveCindy Walsh/Rick Beane20090220Splash Pad Structure Improv & Surface ReplParks & Recreation15,000.00$ 200913,066.92$ ActiveJim Vaughan/Cindy Walsh20090240Hurd Park Community GardenParks & Recreation10,000.00$ 20099,514.23$ ActiveCindy Walsh/Rick Beane20090250Ainsworth Park Field Improvements and IrrigationParks & Recreation42,000.00$ 200938,185.12$ ActiveCindy Walsh/Rick Beane20090260,0270,0280,0290Dakota Park Fencing, Lights, Dugout, Storage Bldg, parkinParks & Recreation235,000.00$ 2009240,000.00$ ActiveCindy Walsh/Rick Beane20090300Beltline Trail ReconstructionParks & Recreation45,000.00$ 200944,700.00$ ActiveCindy Walsh20090310Carpet for Banquet Room at Rec CenterParks & Recreation10,000.00$ 20096,962.00$ ActiveCindy Walsh; Rick Beane20090320Aquila Park Fast Pitch Softball ImprovementsParks & Recreation10,000.00$ 20095,231.09$ ActiveCindy Walsh20090330Surveilance Cameras at Rec Ctr Parking LotParks & Recreation20,000.00$ 200919,199.00$ ActiveCindy Walsh/Rick Beane20100020Bleacher Replacement - Aquila ParkParks & Recreation1 Have to Do25,000.00$ 201024,686.63$ ActiveCindy Walsh/Rick Beane20100030Carpenter Park IrrigationParks & Recreation5 Would Like to Do40,000.00$ 201013,000.00$ ActiveCindy Walsh/Rick Beane20100040Carpenter Park ScoreboardParks & Recreation3 Smart to Do20,000.00$ 20101,379.02$ ActiveCindy Walsh/Rick Beane20100050Nelson Park Hockey & End BoardsParks & Recreation3 Smart to Do10,000.00$ 20106,219.05$ ActiveCindy Walsh/Rick Beane20100060Oak Hill Park Splash Pad ResurfaceParks & Recreation3 Smart to Do6,000.00$ 20108,950.00$ ActiveCindy Walsh/Rick Beane20100070Playground Equip Repl-Browndale & Jorvig ParksParks & Recreation1 Have to Do55,000.00$ 201058,882.03$ ActiveCindy Walsh/Craig Panning20100080Rec Center West Arena Rubber Floor ReplcmentParks & Recreation3 Smart to Do45,000.00$ 201024,859.13$ ActiveCindy Walsh/Craig Panning20100090Rec Center Skating Arena Rstrms & AP ShowersParks & Recreation3 Smart to Do85,000.00$ 20109,482.00$ Not doneActiveCindy Walsh/Rick Beane20100100Birchwood Park improvementsParks & Recreation1 Have to Do583,000.00$ 2010549,145.16$ ActiveCindy Walsh/Craig Panning20100110Rec Center Skate Shop/Eqpt upgradeParks & Recreation3 Smart to Do20,000.00$ 2010ActiveCindy Walsh/Rick Beane20100120Trail ReconstructionParks & Recreation1 Have to Do130,000.00$ 2010132,380.00$ ActiveCindy Walsh/Mark Oestreich20100130Westwood Hills Boardwalk Section ReplacementParks & Recreation1 Have to Do55,000.00$ 2010Not doneActiveCindy Walsh/Mark Oestreich20100140Westwood Hills Perimeter Fence Replacement Ph IIParks & Recreation1 Have to Do40,000.00$ 2010Not doneActiveDenny Millerbernd/Cindy WalshE - XX01Annual Equipment Replacement ProgramParks & Recreation1 Have to Do13,996,594.00$ Study Session Meeting of January 24, 2011 (Item No. 3) Subject: Bidding and Construction/Project ManagementPage 9
SUMMARY OF
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER
APPROVAL PROCEDURE
2/3/10
AUTHORITY:
The city Change Order Approval Procedure was updated and approved September 8, 2009 by City
Council, as follows:
All contract change order(s) are to be approved by the City Manager or the City Council as
described herein.
CHANGE ORDER CONDITIONS
A Change Order is the result of the following conditions:
Owner Requested: Work desired that was not clearly called for in the original contract
documents and could result in adding to or removing from a project or contract.
Changed Condition – Foreseen Conditions: Work involving existing conditions or
construction that was not clearly shown or identified in the original contract documents that
directly affect construction work methods, material/labor costs or time.
Changed Condition – Unforeseen Conditions: Work that could not have been reasonably
identified by the designer in the initial design phase.
Code Change: Construction codes have changed since the design was completed.
Design Deficiency – Added Value: Work that would have resulted in a higher bid price had
the design detail or drawing been correct in the contract documents.
Design Deficiency – No Added Value: Work that clearly results from a design deficiency,
error, or omission, but would not have resulted in an increased bid price if the contract
documents were correct.
APPROVING AUTHORITY and PROCEDURE:
The City Manager MAY approve change orders:
That decrease the contract amount
That are less than $100,000 in value (CO 1 < $100,000)
Which in aggregate is less than $100,000 in total value (CO 1 + CO 2 < $100,000)
Which do not cause the contract to increase to $100,000 or more in total value (Contract
under $100,000 + CO 1< $100,000)
That extend contract time. Time extensions must, however, be reported to the City
Council.
Which do not materially change the scope of the contract
o Submit a memo with a SLP Change Order form to the City Manager for approval
(see pages 2 - 3 for examples)
The City Council approves all change orders:
That are $100,000 in value or more (CO 1 > $100,000)
Which in aggregate are $100,000 or more in total value (CO 1 + CO 2 > $100,000)
Which increase the contract value to $100,000 or more in total value (Contract under
$100,000 + CO 1> $100,000)
Which materially change the scope of the contract (supplemental agreements)
For which the City Manager does not have the authority described above (i.e. change in
scope)
o Submit a City Council report (consent) with a SLP Change Order form for approval
(see pages 4 – 6 for examples)
Study Session Meeting of January 24, 2011 (Item No. 3)
Subject: Bidding and Construction/Project Management Page 10
Parks and Recreation Department
We bid out projects over $50,000 and award projects based on the lowest responsible
bidder. We get 3 price quotes on projects that are under $50,000 and use the lowest
quote. If there are change orders over $100,000 or if the change order makes the project
go over $100,000, we take it to council. Most of our projects are not of a large enough
scale that this happens. Change orders of smaller amounts are brought to the City
Manager for approval.
Study Session Meeting of January 24, 2011 (Item No. 3)
Subject: Bidding and Construction/Project Management Page 11
Study Session Meeting of January 24, 2011 (Item No. 3) Subject: Bidding and Construction/Project ManagementPage 12
Meeting Date: January 24, 2011
Agenda Item #: 4
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Highway 100 Project Update.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
The purpose of this report and study session presentation is to update the City Council on the
status of this Mn/DOT proposed project and obtain Council input on the four (4) Mn/DOT
concepts developed since May 2010, in response to their rescoping efforts.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Mn/DOT is proposing Concept B as their favored concept at this time; however, Concept C also
seems acceptable to both Mn/DOT and Hennepin County. Both Mn/DOT and Hennepin County
do not feel Concepts A or D should be considered further. To help Mn/DOT decide on a
preferred alternate, the following Council input is desired:
1. Does Council have a preference for any of the concepts, in particular B or C?
2. What specific design features does Council like or dislike in any of the concepts?
3. What, if any, further information will Council require to further evaluate these concepts?
BACKGROUND:
History - City and Mn/DOT staff discussed this proposed project with Council at the November
23, 2009 Study Session at which time Mn/DOT staff stated this project was to be “rescoped”
which raised a variety of questions and concerns. Staff was asked to participate in the
forthcoming Mn/DOT project development process and keep Council informed as appropriate.
On March 19, 2010 a host of elected and appointed officials representing St. Louis Park, along
with TwinWest Chamber representatives, met with Mn/DOT Commissioner Tom Sorel to
express our feelings about the Hwy 100 project and our concerns for the rescoping process.
During that meeting we shared with Mn/DOT criteria and design considerations that we felt
needed to be addressed as part of a rescoping process.
On June 14 staff provided Council a written update on the project rescoping process which had
just recently started. Mn/DOT’s intent was to start over with the development of this project;
and, most Mn/DOT project members were new to the project. Meetings were held in April and
May to discuss project area problems, project goals, and possible concepts (sketch planning).
From June through September Mn/DOT, City, and County staff developed four (4) new concepts
for further consideration. These were presented to Council by staff at the October 11, 2010 study
session along with a project summary, a project schedule, and project goals. During late October
to early November Mn/DOT activated their project website which contained five concepts (the
four (4) new concepts and the earlier 2006 Concept) along with other relevant project
information (located at http://www.dot.state.mn.us/metro/projects/hwy100slp/ ).
Study Session Meeting of January 24, 2011 (Item No. 4) Page 2
Subject: Highway 100 Project Update
On December 9, 2010, Mn/DOT hosted a project open house at the St. Louis Park High School
where they displayed the four (4) concepts under consideration and the 2006 Concept for
reference. As part of the open house Mn/DOT ran a power point presentation (attached) and
made available an updated project summary (attached) and a statement of purpose and need (also
attached). About 55 persons attended the open house where they asked questions and provided
input on the concepts; additionally, written comments were also provided for and received by
Mn/DOT. A summary of the comments and themes heard is attached.
Current - Since the open house, Mn/DOT has evaluated the four (4) concepts based on various
criteria to determine acceptability of the concepts (both the concepts and the evaluation are
attached). The 2006 Concept was evaluated only for purposes of comparison. Based on open
house comments and their internal evaluation, Mn/DOT favors Concept B but also feels Concept
C would be acceptable. Concepts A and D do not appear to be acceptable to Mn/DOT or
Hennepin County for various reasons and the 2006 Concept appears unacceptable to Mn/DOT
due to its higher cost. Mn/DOT would like to select a preferred alternate soon so as to continue
moving the project ahead as described in this next section of the report.
Mn/DOT staff will be present at the study session to explain the concepts (as necessary), answer
questions, and solicit Council feedback.
Next Steps - Mn/DOT has developed the following tentative schedule for this project:
o Mn/DOT Selection of a Preferred Alternative January 2011
o Traffic Modeling / Operational Analysis February - March 2011
o Mn/DOT Staff Approved Geometric Layout June 2011
o Public Open House June 2011
o Municipal Consent Approval Process July - December 2011
o Final Geometric Layout January 2012
o Develop Construction Plans and Specifications January 2012 - September 2015
o Open Bids November 2015
o Construction 2016 thru 2018
Mn/DOT is required to obtain Municipal Consent when projects either change access or capacity
or if permanent R/W is required. Mn/DOT anticipates beginning the Municipal Consent Approval
Process during the second half of 2011. That process and schedule is expected to consist of the
following:
o Council Work Session June 2011
o Municipal Consent Request July 2011
o City Schedules Public Hearing July 2011
o Mn/DOT Open House August 2011
o Public Hearing August or September 2011
o Council Work Session October 2011
o Council Approval/Denial of Final Geometric Layout December 2011
(deadline of 90 days after public hearing)
Study Session Meeting of January 24, 2011 (Item No. 4) Page 3
Subject: Highway 100 Project Update
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
Mn/DOT will develop the estimated cost of the project later on during the project development
process and will then refine it as construction plans are developed up to the bid opening date.
The estimated cost at this time is unknown; however, it is safe to say Mn/DOT expects the
project cost to be considerably less than the proposed layout previously developed for this
project. It is too early in the process to even guess at what the City costs might be for this
project. City costs for the previously proposed project were estimated to range from $3 million to
$7 million depending on options provided to the City.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
The following Strategic Direction and focus area was identified by Council in 2007:
St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged community.
Focus will be on:
• Promoting regional transportation issues and related dedicated funding sources affecting
St. Louis Park including but not limited to Hwy 100 and SWLRT.
Attachments: Project Power Point Presentation - December 2010
Project Summary - December 2010
Statement of Purpose and Need - December 2010
Open House - Summary of Comments and Themes
Concepts A - D (January 2011)
2006 Full Build Concept
Concept Evaluation Criteria - 01.14.11
Prepared by: Mike Rardin, Public Works Director
Approved by: Nancy Deno Gohman, Deputy City Manager/HR Director
Highway 100 –St. Louis Park
1939 - A picnic area with a view of Lilac Park along Highway 100.
Study Session Meeting of January 24, 2011 (Item No. 4)
Subject: Highway 100 Project Update Page 4
www.dot.state.mn.us/metro/projects/hwy100slp
Highway 100 Reconstruction
Open House
Thursday, December 9, 2010
St. Louis Park High School Cafeteria
6425 W. 33rd Street, St. Louis Park
5:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m.
Study Session Meeting of January 24, 2011 (Item No. 4)
Subject: Highway 100 Project Update Page 5
Background
►Legislatively Mandated Bridge Replacement
The Highway 100 bridges located at Highway 7 and Minnetonka Blvd
have been identified as structurally deficient bridges and are
legislatively mandated for replacement.
►Major Bottleneck
The section of Highway100 from 36th Street to I-394 was a four-lane
section of freeway between two six-lane segments up until 2006. This
bottleneck caused major congestion during both peak periods and in
both directions.
Study Session Meeting of January 24, 2011 (Item No. 4)
Subject: Highway 100 Project Update Page 6
►Safety Issue
The interim project helped reduce congestion in the area but did not
adequately address the safety issues with the exits and entrances to
and from Highway 100.
Background, cont.
►Three lane conversion
In the fall of 2006, the shoulders of this road segment were converted
to a general purpose through lane northbound and a collector-
distributor lane southbound. These lanes were designed to increase
the existing capacity and throughput until such time as the future
build project could be accomplished.
Study Session Meeting of January 24, 2011 (Item No. 4)
Subject: Highway 100 Project Update Page 7
Purpose
To improve the safety and mobility for the traveling public entering
and exiting Highway 100 between 36th St. and Cedar Lake Road.
(See Purpose and Need )
To replace structurally deficient bridges.
•Highway 7
•Minnetonka Blvd (County Road 5)
Study Session Meeting of January 24, 2011 (Item No. 4)
Subject: Highway 100 Project Update Page 8
Need
Bridges
•Legislatively mandated replacement of structurally deficient bridges
at Highway 7 and Minnetonka Blvd.
Safety
•Merging and weaving problem at entry and exit points.
•Highway 7 is ranked 27th for interchange crash cost statewide.
•Minnetonka Blvd is ranked 76th for interchange crash cost
statewide.
•
Study Session Meeting of January 24, 2011 (Item No. 4)
Subject: Highway 100 Project Update Page 9
Hours of Congestion
1-2 Hours of congestion
AM Peak Period
5 –10 AM
1-2 Hours of congestion
PM Peak Period
2 –7 PM
Study Session Meeting of January 24, 2011 (Item No. 4)
Subject: Highway 100 Project Update Page 10
Crash Data
Study Session Meeting of January 24, 2011 (Item No. 4)
Subject: Highway 100 Project Update Page 11
*2006 3rd Lane Under Construction
*2007 3rd Lane Operational
Study Session Meeting of January 24, 2011 (Item No. 4)
Subject: Highway 100 Project Update Page 12
Study Session Meeting of January 24, 2011 (Item No. 4)
Subject: Highway 100 Project Update Page 13
Metro Avg Severity Rate: 1.10
Metro Avg Crash Rate: 0.74
Study Session Meeting of January 24, 2011 (Item No. 4)
Subject: Highway 100 Project Update Page 14
Highway 100 and Minnetonka Blvd
Study Session Meeting of January 24, 2011 (Item No. 4)
Subject: Highway 100 Project Update Page 15
Highway 100 and Minnetonka Blvd
2007-2009 Interchange Crash Statistics
Chapter 152 Bridge
(Legislatively mandated for replacement)
Ranked #76 statewide for
interchange crash costs.
Average annual crash cost per
year: $1.9 million dollars.
0.99 Annual Crash Rate
(crashes per million vehicles entering interchange)
(.74 metro average)
1.31 Annual Severity Rate
(1.10 metro average)
Study Session Meeting of January 24, 2011 (Item No. 4)
Subject: Highway 100 Project Update Page 16
Study Session Meeting of January 24, 2011 (Item No. 4)
Subject: Highway 100 Project Update Page 17
Highway 100 and Highway 7
Southbound
Study Session Meeting of January 24, 2011 (Item No. 4)
Subject: Highway 100 Project Update Page 18
Highway 100 and Highway 7
2007-2009 Interchange Crash Statistics
Ranked #27 statewide for
interchange crash costs.
121 crashes (2007-2009)
SB under Highway 7 Bridge
Chapter 152 Bridge
(Legislatively mandated for replacement)
Average annual crash cost per
year: $2.7 million dollars.
1.59 Annual Crash Rate
(crashes per million vehicles entering interchange)
(.74 metro average)
2.03 Annual Severity Rate
(1.10 metro average)
Study Session Meeting of January 24, 2011 (Item No. 4)
Subject: Highway 100 Project Update Page 19
Study Session Meeting of January 24, 2011 (Item No. 4)
Subject: Highway 100 Project Update Page 20
Number of Crashes Associated with Loop Area
*3rd Lane Added in 2007
Study Session Meeting of January 24, 2011 (Item No. 4)
Subject: Highway 100 Project Update Page 21
2006 Project Development Concept
Study Session Meeting of January 24, 2011 (Item No. 4)
Subject: Highway 100 Project Update Page 22
2006 Concept
•Allows for frontage road connection north of Minnetonka, west of TH 7.
•Eliminates weaving movements between TH 7 and Minnetonka Blvd.
•Additional bridges and retaining wall needed.
•Major property acquisition needed for construction.
•Proposed roadway eliminates potential stormwater ponding locations and may
create the need for additional right-of-way acquisition to serve this purpose.
2006 Concept
2016 Construction Costs: $100-$125 Million
Study Session Meeting of January 24, 2011 (Item No. 4)
Subject: Highway 100 Project Update Page 23
Alternatives Under Consideration
December 9, 2010
•All concepts replace the bridges at Highway 7, Minnetonka Boulevard,
and the existing trail and railroad bridges over Highway 100.
•All concepts provide 3 lanes in each direction from 36th Ave S. to I-394.
•All concepts include auxiliary lanes where needed to provide safe and
efficient merging areas.
Study Session Meeting of January 24, 2011 (Item No. 4)
Subject: Highway 100 Project Update Page 24
Concept A Concept A
2016 Construction Costs: $30-$35 Million
Concept A
•Auxiliary lanes between Hwy 7 and Minnetonka Blvd would be added in both
directions.
•The entrance ramp from Minnetonka Blvd to northbound Hwy 100 would be
improved.
•The low-speed exits from northbound and southbound Hwy 100 to
Minnetonka Blvd would be retained, as well as the short weaving segment
southbound Hwy 100 between Minnetonka Blvd and Hwy 7.
Study Session Meeting of January 24, 2011 (Item No. 4)
Subject: Highway 100 Project Update Page 25
Concept B
•A two-way frontage road connection to the east of Hwy 100 would provide
access to/from the south at Minnetonka Blvd.
•Eliminates the weaving on northbound and southbound Hwy 100
between Minnetonka Blvd and Hwy 7 (there would be a weaving
segment between the W. 27th Street entrance ramp and Minnetonka Blvd
exit ramp).
•Allows two-way access on Utica Ave. south of Minnetonka Blvd.
•Improves the entrance ramp from Minnetonka Blvd to northbound Hwy
100.
•No direct access from Minnetonka Blvd to TH 100.
Concept B
2016 Construction Costs: $40-$50 Million
Study Session Meeting of January 24, 2011 (Item No. 4)
Subject: Highway 100 Project Update Page 26
Concept C
•Eliminates the weaving on northbound and southbound Hwy 100
between Minnetonka Blvd and Hwy 7 (there would be a weaving segment
between the W. 27th Street entrance ramp and Minnetonka Blvd exit ramp).
•Improves the entrance ramp from Minnetonka Blvd to northbound Hwy
100.
•Requires an extra bridge and retaining walls for southbound ramps
between Minnetonka Blvd and Hwy 7.
Concept C
2016 Construction Costs: $45-$55 Million
Study Session Meeting of January 24, 2011 (Item No. 4)
Subject: Highway 100 Project Update Page 27
Concept D
•Eliminates the weaving on northbound and southbound Hwy 100 between
Minnetonka Blvd and Hwy 7.
•Requires an extra bridge and retaining walls for southbound ramps between
Minnetonka Blvd and Hwy 7.
•Diverging Diamond Interchange at Minnetonka Blvd and Hwy 100:
•Eliminates need for turn lanes
•Is a new concept to Minnesota, not familiar
•Could conflict with signal operations at W. Lake Street
Concept D
2016 Construction Costs: $40-$50 Million
Study Session Meeting of January 24, 2011 (Item No. 4)
Subject: Highway 100 Project Update Page 28
www.dot.state.mn.us/metro/projects/hwy100slp
Study Session Meeting of January 24, 2011 (Item No. 4)
Subject: Highway 100 Project Update Page 29
For More
Information
Contact:
Ramankutty Kannankutty
Project Manager
Water’s Edge
(651)234-7720
Ramankutty.kannankutty
@state.mn.us
John Griffith
West Area Manager
Water’s Edge
(651)234-7728
John.griffith@state.mn.us
December 2010
Highway 100 from County
Road 5 to Highway 7
Hennepin County
St. Louis Park
Bridge Replacement,
safety and mobility
improvements to TH 100.
Estimated Costs
$100-125 million
Previous Costs were
estimated to be $140
million (2014)
Proposed Letting:
11/20/2015
Construction season:
2016-18
For a schedule of Public
Meetings, contact the Area
Manager
MnDOT Metro District Project Summary
Major Reconstruction
BACKGROUND:
This segment is the last sub-standard section on Highway 100 south of Interstate
394 and is one of the most congested freeways in the Metro area. Originally built
in the mid-1930’s, it is part of the first beltway around the Twin Cities. Some
moderate improvements were completed in 2007 in advance of the Crosstown/I-
35W reconstruction. In 2008 the State Legislature passed the Chapter 152
legislation that identified among other bridges, the Highway 7 and Minnetonka
Boulevard bridges as structurally deficient and in need of replacement. In addition
to the 2 bridges being identified, the Metropolitan Council’s 2009 Transportation
Policy Plan recommended this project for reassessment for potential scope
reduction and cost savings. A proposed project in this area is currently scheduled
to be let in 2015, with construction occurring from 2016 until 2018.
The 2009 traffic volume on this segment ranges from 111,000+ AADT near 36th
Street to 127,000+ AADT near 27th Street. The volume to capacity ratio is 1:3 and
it operates at a Level of Service F. This section of roadway experiences as much
as 4 hours of congestion during the morning and afternoon peak periods
combined.
The Highway 100 and County Road 5 (Minnetonka Blvd) interchange ranked 76th
of 374 metro area interchanges with regard to crash cost. Fifty one percent of
crashes at this location were rear ends which is indicative of congested conditions.
There were 422 crashes on the stretch of roadway from 36th Street to Cedar Lake
Road in the years 2007 – 2009. Of these, 55% were rear ends and 22% were
sideswipes. This indicates both a congestion problem and substandard
acceleration/merge areas.
The project purpose is to address basic infrastructure deficiencies, improve
interchange safety at Highway 7 and County Road 5, and improve the traffic
operations of TH 100 by increasing safety and mobility, through improvements
such as modifying ramp acceleration/merging spacing and maintaining 6 through
lanes of traffic within the project limits.
Currently five proposed design alternatives are being considered. The base
concepts included in all alternatives involve replacing the bridges at Highway 7
and County Road 5, adding auxiliary lanes on Highway 100 between Highway 7
and County Road 5, adding a parallel acceleration lane for the loop from Highway
7 to southbound Highway 100 and maintaining 6 through lanes of traffic within the
project limits.
PROJECT DOCUMENTS & APPROVALS SCHEDULE:
Four alternatives are being considered for a preferred option.
Study Session Meeting of January 24, 2011 (Item No. 4)
Subject: Highway 100 Project Update Page 30
For More
Information
Contact:
Person
Office
Phone number
Email address
December 9, 2010
Highway 100: 36th Street to Cedar Lake Road
Purpose and Need Statement
Purpose
The purpose of this project is to replace the structurally deficient bridges on Highway 100 located at
Highway 7 and Minnetonka Boulevard (CSAH 5) as mandated by 2008 Minnesota Laws Chapter 152
(Minn. Stat. 165.14). The purpose is also to improve the safety and mobility for the traveling public
entering and exiting Highway 100 between Cedar Lake Road and 36th Street in order to match the existing
and available upstream and downstream freeway capacity.
Need
Bridges
The passage of Minnesota Laws 2008, Chapter 152 resulted in the development of the Trunk Highway
Bridge Improvement Program for accelerating repair and replacement of trunk highway bridges
throughout the state. The Highway 100 bridges located at Highway 7 and Minnetonka Boulevard have
been identified as structurally deficient bridges and are legislatively mandated for replacement. The
bridge at Highway 7 was built in 1939 and currently has a deficiency rating of 71.2. The bridge located at
Minnetonka Boulevard was also built in 1939 and has a deficiency rating of 63.0.
Congestion
The section of Highway100 from 36th Street to Interstate 394 was a four-lane section of freeway between
two six-lane segments up until 2006. This bottleneck caused major congestion during both peak periods
and in both directions.
In the fall of 2006, Metro District converted the shoulders of this road segment to a general purpose
through lane northbound and a collector-distributor lane southbound. These lanes were designed to
increase the existing capacity and throughput until such time as the future build project could be
accomplished. The interim project helped reduce congestion in the area but did not address the
structurally deficient bridges nor did it adequately address the safety issues with the exits and entrances to
and from Highway 100.
As a result of the shoulder conversion project, mobility, congestion and speed within the area improved.
The number of trips served increased by 32% during the AM Peak Period and increased by 34% during
the PM Peak Period. Congestion (speeds falling below 45 mph) decreased by 77% during the AM Peak
Period and 80% during the PM Peak Period. While remarkable, this section of Highway 100 still
experiences 2-4 hours of congestion each day during the AM and PM peak periods combined.
Study Session Meeting of January 24, 2011 (Item No. 4)
Subject: Highway 100 Project Update Page 31
Safety
After the shoulder conversion project was completed, the number of crashes increased southbound and
northbound by 49% and 17% respectively. Notably, southbound crashes doubled in the area of Highway
7 after the project. Most of these crashes can be attributed to the substandard ramp from westbound
Highway 7 to go southbound on Highway 100.
The Highway 100 and Highway 7 interchange ranked 27th on the 2007–2009 Statewide Interchange Crash
Cost List. During those years the average annual crash cost at this location was $2.7 million dollars per
year. The interchange has a crash rate of 1.59 MEV (crashes per million vehicles entering interchange)
compared to the metro average of 0.74 MEV. The severity rate is 2.03 MEV compared to the metro
average of 1.10 MEV.
Highway100 at Minnetonka Boulevard ranked 76th on the 2007–2009 Statewide Interchange Crash Cost
List. During those years, the average annual crash cost at this location was $1.9 million dollars per year.
The interchange has a crash rate of 0.99 MEV and a severity rate of 1.31 MEV.
Crash studies have indicated that several of the substandard ramps along this corridor are causing an
unacceptable number of correctable crashes. These substandard lanes affect the safety and operation of
the freeway and have a significant impact on merging and diverging operations.
Study Session Meeting of January 24, 2011 (Item No. 4)
Subject: Highway 100 Project Update Page 32
Highway 100 Open House Themes/Comments from Dec. 9, 2010
Overall Themes: The following represents a general synopsis of the preferences represented
at the Highway 100 open house on Dec. 9, 2010, taken from submitted written comments as
well as verbal comments given to project staff.
12-foot lanes on Hwy 100 are preferred; less than 12 feet is deemed too narrow
Vegetation/landscaping is a consideration and an effort should be made to keep existing
vegetation as well as providing new vegetation
Concept D thus far has been the most well-received
Strong desire for pedestrian/bike access to be maintained and increased (extend trails,
etc)
Prefer a design that will keep through traffic out of residential neighborhoods (easy
access to/from the highway, not include an extensive/heavily used frontage road system,
etc)
Desire to address congestion on local roads and particularly on Minnetonka Blvd.
Desire to resolve any right of way concerns as soon as possible
Approval for lengthening bridges and adding lanes on Hwy 100
Approval for lengthening acceleration lanes to Hwy 100 (easier merging desired)
Many are divided on the idea of noise barriers—some like them, some do not, some
would want a berm rather than a wall, etc
Study Session Meeting of January 24, 2011 (Item No. 4)
Subject: Highway 100 Project Update Page 33
Written and verbal comments: The following are the specific written comments submitted, as
well as verbal comments heard by project staff, contributing to the overall themes above.
Written Comments submitted
I don’t like not being able to get to Hwy 100 southbound from CSAH 5 (Minnetonka
Blvd). Cutting the trees down north of Minnetonka and east of 100 worries me. The
crisscross on Hwy 100 interests me the most out of the plans.
If you’re not going to do it right don’t do it at all. Not replacing the main line to what is
north and south of us just doesn’t make sense. We need a modern freeway, not a retro-
fit. The 11-foot lanes instead of 12-foot lanes (like a modern freeway) are not safe. Some
of the exits and entrances are nice but some are bigger, i.e. having to go out of the way
to enter Hwy 100.
Designs are not consistent with the quality of design of 100 north and south of the area.
Narrow lanes remain while rest of 100 has wider lanes. Need design that enhances
movement on and off 100.
Exit Hwy 100 south to Minnetonka Blvd needs to change back to resident street and new
exit behind Holiday!
It has been difficult to access the frontage road in front of Benilde for years when
traveling on Parkwoods. Access will only be worse or non-existent when office buildings
are built on west end.
I own the Holiday store on Minnetonka Blvd. and Hwy 100. Concept A is the best plan
for my business; the other concepts will have a huge negative impact on my business.
Prefer Concept D
Concepts A, B, C—Not D
Interested in Concept D for ease of traffic flow. I would like all plans to maintain or
improve on trail access, specifically SE corner of Hwy 100 and Co. Rd. 5. I like keeping
traffic on 100, not breaking off into neighborhoods. Love getting rid of median at SW side
of Hwy 100.
Liked Concept C
As this is such a residential area, it is inappropriate for concept B to not include entrance
and exits at both Minnetonka Blvd and Hwy 7 for ALL directions. For safety concerns—
lane width should be the same as the rest of Hwy 100 farther north and south. It is
currently too narrow and the plans appear to keep that width. As a resident in the area
that has been considered to be taken for the prior renditions I am not happy to see my
house value will now be vastly lowered due to the closeness of the highway and the
probable sound wall which I DON’T want! I like sunshine! I have a garden… I would
actually have preferred the first plan from 2006.
Prefer Concept B. Possible closure of Utica entrance onto Hwy 100. Sound barriers
along Hwy 100 from apts. To Minnetonka Blvd.
Study Session Meeting of January 24, 2011 (Item No. 4)
Subject: Highway 100 Project Update Page 34
Excellent work! I am relieved after 4 years of worrying about the first plan. This plan is
sensitive to the neighborhoods and clearly identifies the problems—with less costly
solutions—all of the new plans are good, details still need to be worked out. Assets, to
me:
o Toledo Ave. from Minnetonka to 26th intact—not a service road
o Homes on the west side of Toledo remain
o Major exit from 100 northbound occurs only at 7
o Holiday access point (+ major problem) is solved both on Minnetonka Blvd and
west entry
o Hwy 7 interchange is smaller than currently which is a plus for residents
o More existing trees will remain
o Quieter—less busy traffic north of Minnetonka (eliminates light and que, and
motorcycle take-offs)
What I would still like would be for the existing bike path on west side of 100 from Hwy 7
north to continue to Minnetonka Blvd and possibly go under Minnetonka and pop up on
quiet cul-de-sac Toledo. These new plans are very thoughtful.
Comments:
o Plan A - This seems to be really just new bridges and resurfacing of what is
currently there. In my mind it is just a "very small band aid" approach. If traffic
will not increase on highway 100 in future years, that might work, but if it does,
this approach does not seem to be a wise use of taxpayer dollars.
o Plan B - The exit for Highway 7/25 and Minnetonka Blvd are shown to be one
and the same. Those who want to exit on Minnetonka Blvd will have to exit what
looks like a mile or so before, and then may have to stop at a stoplight at 7/25,
then again at Minnetonka Blvd. I can see a long back-up when you are trying to
use one exit for two busy roads. I was on 7/25 the other night at 8:00, and
counted 20 cars waiting at the light - what happens when it is rush hour times? I
suggested that the Minnetonka Blvd exit join up with that same roadway north of
7/25, which everyone at the table seemed to think was a good idea. That same
idea seems to work ok at Excelsior Blvd for traffic exiting from 100 north, and
those going north from Excelsior Blvd. There needs to be an entrance to
Highway 100 south from Minnetonka Blvd. The plan shows that traffic
runs through neighborhoods in a very round about way, which does not seem to
be an acceptable option.
o Plan C - This is more acceptable than Plan B. It does have the entrance to
South 100 from Minnetonka Blvd, but still has the issue of the exit for Minnetonka
Blvd
o Plan D - I believe this is the most acceptable of the ideas. It has the same issue
with the Minnetonka Blvd exit. I believe that issue really must be addressed. I
do not like the fact that Utica becomes a frontage road, and hope that people
who want to get to Minnetonka Blvd would not use that rather than staying on
100 and taking the Minnetonka Blvd exit.
I know that there will be discussion about noise abatement once a plan is selected. I
would like to recommend that a berm be built with a row of evergreens along the entire
Study Session Meeting of January 24, 2011 (Item No. 4)
Subject: Highway 100 Project Update Page 35
length. I know that most residents on my block do not want a wall, so that may be a
good alternative.
Verbal Comments heard at open house
Need for peds/bikes to easily/safely cross Hwy 100 at Minnetonka Blvd
Liked storm ponds - more were better - seem to be aesthetically pleasing
Concept “D” (DDI) seemed to be the most well-received. Attendees liked the base
option as it is simple and poses “no change” until they realize it does not address local
system issues they have, then they move towards the other concepts.
Strong desire to keep the trail south of Minnetonka Blvd plus add one from there north to
the Cedar Lake Trail
Acceptance of Utica north of Minnetonka Blvd as a two way frontage road other than by
one resident on Utica
Acceptance to realign the southbound exit ramp to Minnetonka Blvd to the east side of
the Holiday station. Limit access to the station to the north side
Keep cut through traffic out of neighborhood southwest of Hwy 100
Do not create a frontage road from Minnetonka Blvd south and west to Wooddale Ave -
keep cut through traffic out of that area
Simple concepts are better as long as they address the issues
Residents experience problems getting onto Minnetonka Blvd due to heavy
traffic/congestion
Liked northbound entrance ramp lengthening / acceleration lane to Hwy 100
Desire for additional corridor vegetation with lilacs
Desire to move ahead quickly to resolve R/W concerns - residents held hostage the past
10 years
Liked bridge lengthenings and lane widening/additions
Study Session Meeting of January 24, 2011 (Item No. 4)
Subject: Highway 100 Project Update Page 36
SUBJECT TO CHANGEPRELIMINARYDATE:1/19/2011SUBJECT TO CHANGEPRELIMINARYDATE:1/19/2011SUBJECT TO CHANGEPRELIMINARYDATE:1/19/2011SUBJECT TO CHANGEPRELIMINARYDATE:1/19/2011SUBJECT TO CHANGEPRELIMINARYDATE:1/19/2011SUBJECT TO CHANGEPRELIMINARYDATE:1/19/20111/19/2011DATE:SUBJECT TO CHANGEPRELIMINARYSUBJECT TO CHANGEPRELIMINARYDATE:1/19/2011UNITED METHODIST CHURCH ALDERSGATEFIRE STATION #1LUGGAGE WORLDSERVICE CO AUTOMOBILEPLUMBINGMOTZKOTOMREFRIGERATION INC. SOUTH TOWNMN CONCRETE SPECIALITIESVFWAUTO BROKERS INTEGRITYREBERS HOMESBYERLYSTARGETWALSER FORDGOODYEAR AARCEE PARTY & TENT RENTAL AUDIO KING WAREHOUSEMcGARVEY COFFEECITY SCAPEAPTS.NORDIC WARE
DATA SOURCE HAGEN36TH ST. W.PARK CENTER BLVD.GOODRICH AVE.35TH ST. W.34TH ST.XENWOOD AVE. S.WEBSTER AVE. S.33RD ST.WEBSTER AVE. S.LAKE ST.MINNETONKA BLVD.ROLLER GARDENCOLONIAL TERRACESTORECONVENIENCEMARATHONLINK BROS. FLORISTMINI MALLGROVES ACADEMYMINNETONKA TERRACEHOLIDAYUTICA AVE. S.VERNON AVE. S.29TH ST. W.28TH ST. W.28TH ST. W.27TH ST. W.VERNON AVE. S.UTICA AVE. S.THE REFORMATIONLUTHERAN CHURCH OFTHE COURTYARD APTS.PARK RIDGE APTS.UTICA AVE. S.STEPHENS DR.WIN STEHENS JEEP BUICK DEALERSHIPUSED CARSWIN STEPHENS BUICKEAST FRONTAGE RD.BENILDE ST. MARGARETBENILDE ST. MARGARET SCHOOLBENILDE ST. MARGARET SCHOOLBETHEL SYNAGOGUEPARKWOOD RD.25 ST. W.26TH ST. W. RALIEGH AVE. S.TOLEDO AVE. S.27TH ST. W.28TH ST. W.TOLEDO AVE. S.SALEM AVE. S.29TH ST. W.MINNETONKA BLVD.ST. GEORGES
CHURCHAUTOMATIVEDUNRITETOLEDO AVE. S.31ST ST. W.SALEM AVE. S.& UNDERGROUND GARAGEBRITTANY APARTMENTS RALIEGH AVE. S.QUENTIN AVE. S.PRINCETON AVE. S.PRINCETON AVE. S.27TH ST. W.28TH ST. W.26TH ST. W.OTTAWA AVE. S.OTTAWA PL.OTTAWA AVE. S.BELTLINE BLVD.PARK GLEN RD.RALEIGH AVE. S.CENTER BLVD.WOODDA LE AVE.XENWOOD AVE. S.35 1/2 ST.WEBSTER AVE. S.XENWOOD AVE. S.26TH ST. W.26TH ST. W.25 1/2 ST.336033563352334833693361335533493343334133693337335033443340314831403130562356195601312131293133314131473153315731613205321132173225323132353241326532735530295329455524550029482944293429302918291029572955292529192913290729012851284528412835283128012785277727732769276527572753274927452737273327292725271727132709270126552651264726452643264126312600260426102616262026242700270827122716272027242728273227382742275027582764276827722780278828002804280828162824283228402848285629002910291829263148314431383132312831113101304730453033302930215227522352195209520752033044304830523100310831123116312031493145314131353131312531173109310531013057305530453035303130253021301329392933292529212917291329092901285528512847283528312829281928152801275127472743273527252715270927052701265726492645263526252600260826122616262026242632263626442648265627002704270827122716272427282736274027442750510851122937293329292925291929152907290129162920292429302936MN TH 7MN TH10036TH AVE SCSAH 25CSAH 5CSAH 5MN TH 100to solicit input from the affected units.A public involvement process will then take placewill be proposed as part the proposed project.Noise barriers found to be feasible and reasonable part of the required environmental process.A detailed Noise Analysis will be performed asCONCEPT A 12-15-2010TH100 SP 2734-3378579079580080581081582082583083584084585085586086587087578579078579010 05101010290295300295300875584015207800
107857908408
45 152078579055875875404550556010152025202510 58355605655705755800595 10045 50
5560
5
56055
6010152010
10
151015202530510152025301
0
1510
15
20251015201010158512’ INP12’ INP12’ INPINP ACCELVAR SHLD INP12’ AUX12’ INP 12’ INP 12’ INP VAR SHLD INP 10’ SHLD12’ AUX10’ SHLD10’SHLD12’ AUX11’ INP11’ INP11’ INP11’ INP11’ INP11’ INP10’ SHLD16’INP 4’SHLDINP 4’SHLD(TYPICAL THRUOUT PROJECT)TEMPORARY PORTABLE CONCRETE MEDIAN BARRIER14’ESC11’INP11’INP11’INP11’INP11’INP11’INP10’SHLD8’14’180’R654’R420’R430’R14’AUX11’INP11’INP11’INP11’INP11’INP11’INP6’SHLD1146’R10’SHLD11’INP11’INP11’INP11’INP11’INP11’INP12’AUX8’SHLD92’R10’SHLD11’INP11’INP11’INP11’INP11’INP11’INP8’SHLD12’AUX575’R820’R14’INP14’AUX(CONST. UNDER SP 2706-222)INPLACE DETENTION PONDLEGENDINPLACE POND(SP2706-222)POSSIBLE PONDING LOCATIONCURB & GUTTER, RAISED ISLANDBRIDGES & RETAINING WALLSPAVED SHOULDERROADWAYLEGENDINPLACE POND(SP2706-222)POSSIBLE PONDING LOCATIONCURB & GUTTER, RAISED ISLANDBRIDGES & RETAINING WALLSPAVED SHOULDERROADWAYPOSSIBLE POND LOCATIONPOSSIBLE POND LOCATIONPOSSIBLE POND LOCATIONPOSSIBLE POND LOCATIONStudy Session Meeting of January 24, 2011 (Item No. 4) Subject: Highway 100 Project UpdatePage 37
10 05101010290295300295300875584015207800
107857908408
45 152078579055875875404550556010152025202510 58355605655705755800595 10045 50
5560
5
56055
6010152010
10
151015202530510152025301
0
1510
15
202510152010101585DATE:1/19/2011SUBJECT TO CHANGEPRELIMINARYSUBJECT TO CHANGEPRELIMINARYDATE:1/19/2011SUBJECT TO CHANGEPRELIMINARYDATE:1/19/2011SUBJECT TO CHANGEPRELIMINARYDATE:1/19/2011SUBJECT TO CHANGEPRELIMINARYDATE:1/19/2011SUBJECT TO CHANGEPRELIMINARYDATE:1/19/2011SUBJECT TO CHANGEPRELIMINARYDATE:1/19/2011SUBJECT TO CHANGEPRELIMINARYDATE:1/19/2011UNITED METHODIST CHURCH ALDERSGATEFIRE STATION #1LUGGAGE WORLDSERVICE CO AUTOMOBILEPLUMBINGMOTZKOTOMREFRIGERATION INC. SOUTH TOWNMN CONCRETE SPECIALITIESVFWAUTO BROKERS INTEGRITYREBERS HOMESBYERLYSTARGETWALSER FORDGOODYEAR AARCEE PARTY & TENT RENTAL AUDIO KING WAREHOUSEMcGARVEY COFFEECITY SCAPEAPTS.NORDIC WARE
DATA SOURCE HAGEN36TH ST. W.PARK CENTER BLVD.GOODRICH AVE.35TH ST. W.34TH ST.XENWOOD AVE. S.WEBSTER AVE. S.33RD ST.WEBSTER AVE. S.LAKE ST.MINNETONKA BLVD.ROLLER GARDENCOLONIAL TERRACESTORECONVENIENCEMARATHONLINK BROS. FLORISTMINI MALLGROVES ACADEMYMINNETONKA TERRACEHOLIDAYUTICA AVE. S.VERNON AVE. S.29TH ST. W.28TH ST. W.28TH ST. W.27TH ST. W.VERNON AVE. S.UTICA AVE. S.THE REFORMATIONLUTHERAN CHURCH OFTHE COURTYARD APTS.PARK RIDGE APTS.UTICA AVE. S.STEPHENS DR.WIN STEHENS JEEP BUICK DEALERSHIPUSED CARSWIN STEPHENS BUICKEAST FRONTAGE RD.BENILDE ST. MARGARETBENILDE ST. MARGARET SCHOOLBENILDE ST. MARGARET SCHOOLBETHEL SYNAGOGUEPARKWOOD RD.25 ST. W.26TH ST. W. RALIEGH AVE. S.TOLEDO AVE. S.27TH ST. W.28TH ST. W.TOLEDO AVE. S.SALEM AVE. S.29TH ST. W.MINNETONKA BLVD.ST. GEORGES
CHURCHAUTOMATIVEDUNRITETOLEDO AVE. S.31ST ST. W.SALEM AVE. S.& UNDERGROUND GARAGEBRITTANY APARTMENTS RALIEGH AVE. S.QUENTIN AVE. S.PRINCETON AVE. S.PRINCETON AVE. S.27TH ST. W.28TH ST. W.26TH ST. W.OTTAWA AVE. S.OTTAWA PL.OTTAWA AVE. S.BELTLINE BLVD.PARK GLEN RD.RALEIGH AVE. S.CENTER BLVD.WOODDA LE AVE.XENWOOD AVE. S.35 1/2 ST.WEBSTER AVE. S.XENWOOD AVE. S.26TH ST. W.26TH ST. W.25 1/2 ST.336033563352334833693361335533493343334133693337335033443340314831403130562356195601312131293133314131473153315731613205321132173225323132353241326532735530295329455524550029482944293429302918291029572955292529192913290729012851284528412835283128012785277727732769276527572753274927452737273327292725271727132709270126552651264726452643264126312600260426102616262026242700270827122716272027242728273227382742275027582764276827722780278828002804280828162824283228402848285629002910291829263148314431383132312831113101304730453033302930215227522352195209520752033044304830523100310831123116312031493145314131353131312531173109310531013057305530453035303130253021301329392933292529212917291329092901285528512847283528312829281928152801275127472743273527252715270927052701265726492645263526252600260826122616262026242632263626442648265627002704270827122716272427282736274027442750510851122937293329292925291929152907290129162920292429302936UTICA AVE. S.36TH AVE SMN TH100MN TH 7CSAH 25CSAH 5CSAH 5MN TH 100to solicit input from the affected units.A public involvement process will then take placewill be proposed as part the proposed project.Noise barriers found to be feasible and reasonable part of the required environmental process.A detailed Noise Analysis will be performed asCONCEPT B 12-15-2010TH100 SP 2734-3378579079580080581081582082583083584084585085586086587087578579078579012’ INP12’ INP12’ INPINP ACCELVAR SHLD INP12’ AUX12’ INP 12’ INP 12’ INP VAR SHLD INP 10’ SHLD12’ AUX10’ SHLD12’ AUX11’ INP11’ INP11’ INP11’ INP11’ INP11’ INP10’ SHLD11’INP11’INP11’INP11’INP11’INP10’SHLD11’INP11’INP11’INP11’INP11’INP11’INPLEGEND10’SHLD10’SHLD10’SHLD12’ X 880’ ACCEL10’ SHLD11’INP11’INP11’INP10’ SHLD11’ INP11’ INP11’ INP11’ INP11’ INP11’ INP12’ AUX12’ AUX10’ SHLD8’ SHLD14’9’9’14’15’15’12’12’12’12’1
6
’15’15’12’ INP11’ INP11’ INP12’ INP12’ INP12’ INP10’ SHLD INP12’ AUX8’ SHLD14’14’14’ LTL14’ RTL14’12’12’ LTL12’ RTL12’ RTL12’14’14’ LTL12’12’14’ LTL12’12’14’16’14’ LTL12’14’14’12’14’12’4’ SHLD14’12’4’ SHLD14’12’16’12’14’10’ SHLD12’14’10’ SHLD12’14’14’ LTL12’12’16’12’14’10’ SHLD10’ SHLD INP11’ INP11’ INP11’ INP10’ SHLD16’16’14’12’ WALK/TRAIL12’ WALK/TRAIL12’ WALK/TRAIL12’ WALK/TRAIL12’ WALK/TRAIL11’INP11’INP11’11’(CONST. UNDER SP 2706-222)INPLACE DETENTION POND
POSSIBLE POND LOCATIONPOSSIBLE POND LOCATIONPOSSIBLE POND LOCATIONPOSSIBLE POND LOCATIONINPLACE POND(SP2706-222)POSSIBLE PONDING LOCATIONCURB & GUTTER, RAISED ISLANDBRIDGES & RETAINING WALLSPAVED SHOULDERROADWAYLEGENDINPLACE POND(SP2706-222)POSSIBLE PONDING LOCATIONCURB & GUTTER, RAISED ISLANDBRIDGES & RETAINING WALLSPAVED SHOULDERROADWAY12’12’14’ LTL10’SHLD16’12’12’12’RTL14’LTL18’18’18’18’18’18’16’14’LTL14’ RTL14’14’16’16’16’
R
T
L10’SHLD16’14’16’6’SHLD
20’
1
6’14’6’ S
HL
D20’10’S
H
L
D 4’SHLD14’ L
T
L
14’ R
T
L
12’14’6’ SHLD
14’4’ SHLD10’ SHLDPOSSIBLE POND LOCATIONPOSSIBLE POND LOCATIONPOSSIBLE POND LOCATIONStudy Session Meeting of January 24, 2011 (Item No. 4) Subject: Highway 100 Project UpdatePage 38
10 05101010290295300295300875584015207800
107857908408
45 152078579055875875404550556010152025202510 58355605655705755800595 10045 50
5560
5
56055
6010152010
10
151015202530510152025301
0
1510
15
202510152010101585DATE:1/19/2011SUBJECT TO CHANGEPRELIMINARYDATE:SUBJECT TO CHANGEPRELIMINARYDATE:DATE:1/19/2011SUBJECT TO CHANGEPRELIMINARYDATE:SUBJECT TO CHANGEPRELIMINARYDATE:1/19/2011DATE:1/19/2011SUBJECT TO CHANGEPRELIMINARYDATE:1/19/2011SUBJECT TO CHANGEPRELIMINARYSUBJECT TO CHANGEPRELIMINARY1/19/20111/19/2011SUBJECT TO CHANGEPRELIMINARY1/19/2011UNITED METHODIST CHURCH ALDERSGATEFIRE STATION #1LUGGAGE WORLDSERVICE CO AUTOMOBILEPLUMBINGMOTZKOTOMREFRIGERATION INC. SOUTH TOWNMN CONCRETE SPECIALITIESVFWAUTO BROKERS INTEGRITYREBERS HOMESBYERLYSTARGETWALSER FORDGOODYEAR AARCEE PARTY & TENT RENTAL AUDIO KING WAREHOUSEMcGARVEY COFFEECITY SCAPEAPTS.NORDIC WARE
DATA SOURCE HAGEN36TH ST. W.PARK CENTER BLVD.GOODRICH AVE.35TH ST. W.34TH ST.XENWOOD AVE. S.WEBSTER AVE. S.33RD ST.WEBSTER AVE. S.LAKE ST.MINNETONKA BLVD.ROLLER GARDENCOLONIAL TERRACESTORECONVENIENCEMARATHONLINK BROS. FLORISTMINI MALLGROVES ACADEMYMINNETONKA TERRACEHOLIDAYUTICA AVE. S.VERNON AVE. S.29TH ST. W.28TH ST. W.28TH ST. W.27TH ST. W.VERNON AVE. S.UTICA AVE. S.THE REFORMATIONLUTHERAN CHURCH OFTHE COURTYARD APTS.PARK RIDGE APTS.UTICA AVE. S.STEPHENS DR.WIN STEHENS JEEP BUICK DEALERSHIPUSED CARSWIN STEPHENS BUICKEAST FRONTAGE RD.BENILDE ST. MARGARETBENILDE ST. MARGARET SCHOOLBENILDE ST. MARGARET SCHOOLBETHEL SYNAGOGUEPARKWOOD RD.25 ST. W.26TH ST. W. RALIEGH AVE. S.TOLEDO AVE. S.27TH ST. W.28TH ST. W.TOLEDO AVE. S.SALEM AVE. S.29TH ST. W.MINNETONKA BLVD.ST. GEORGES
CHURCHAUTOMATIVEDUNRITETOLEDO AVE. S.31ST ST. W.SALEM AVE. S.& UNDERGROUND GARAGEBRITTANY APARTMENTS RALIEGH AVE. S.QUENTIN AVE. S.PRINCETON AVE. S.PRINCETON AVE. S.27TH ST. W.28TH ST. W.26TH ST. W.OTTAWA AVE. S.OTTAWA PL.OTTAWA AVE. S.BELTLINE BLVD.PARK GLEN RD.RALEIGH AVE. S.CENTER BLVD.WOODDA LE AVE.XENWOOD AVE. S.35 1/2 ST.WEBSTER AVE. S.XENWOOD AVE. S.26TH ST. W.26TH ST. W.25 1/2 ST.336033563352334833693361335533493343334133693337335033443340314831403130562356195601312131293133314131473153315731613205321132173225323132353241326532735530295329455524550029482944293429302918291029572955292529192913290729012851284528412835283128012785277727732769276527572753274927452737273327292725271727132709270126552651264726452643264126312600260426102616262026242700270827122716272027242728273227382742275027582764276827722780278828002804280828162824283228402848285629002910291829263148314431383132312831113101304730453033302930215227522352195209520752033044304830523100310831123116312031493145314131353131312531173109310531013057305530453035303130253021301329392933292529212917291329092901285528512847283528312829281928152801275127472743273527252715270927052701265726492645263526252600260826122616262026242632263626442648265627002704270827122716272427282736274027442750510851122937293329292925291929152907290129162920292429302936UTICA AVE. S.36TH AVE SMN TH 7CSAH 25CSAH 5CSAH 5MN TH 100to solicit input from the affected units.A public involvement process will then take placewill be proposed as part the proposed project.Noise barriers found to be feasible and reasonable part of the required environmental process.A detailed Noise Analysis will be performed asCONCEPT C 10-30-2010TH100 SP 2734-3378579079580080581081582082583083584084585085586086587087578579078579012’ INP12’ INP12’ INPINP ACCELVAR SHLD INP12’ AUX12’ INP 12’ INP 12’ INP VAR SHLD INP 10’ SHLD12’ AUX10’ SHLD10’SHLD12’ AUX11’ INP11’ INP11’ INP11’ INP11’ INP11’ INP10’ SHLD11’INP11’INP11’INP11’INP11’INP10’SHLD11’INP11’INP11’INP11’INP11’INP11’INPLEGENDWB-62AASHTO 2004 (US)WB-62AASHTO 2004 (US)WB
-62
AASHTO
2004 (US)WB-62AASHTO 2004 (US)26.53ft
WB-62AASHTO 2004 (US)WB-62AASHTO 2004 (US)WB-62AASHTO 2004 (US)WB-62AASHTO 2004 (US)20.28ftWB-62AASHTO 2004 (US)WB-62AASHTO 2004 (US)WB-62AASHTO 2004 (US)WB-62AASHTO 2004 (US)26.62ftWB-62
AAS
HTO
20
04
(US
)WB-62AASHTO 2004 (US)WB-62AA
SHTO
2004 (US)25.61ftWB-62
AAS
HTO
20
04
(
US
)WB-62AASHTO 2004 (US)WB-62AASHT
O
2
0
0
4
(US)WB-62AASHTO 2004 (US)26.42ftWB-62AASHTO 2004 (US)WB-62AASHTO 2004 (US)WB-62AASHTO 2004 (US)WB-62AASHTO 2004 (US)26.
43
f
t
WB-62AASHTO 2004 (US)WB-62AASHTO 2004 (US)WB-62AASHTO 2004 (US)WB-62AASHTO 2004 (US)WB-62AASHTO 2004 (US)WB-62AASHTO 2004 (US)WB-62AASHTO 2004 (US)WB-62AASHTO 2004 (US)10’SHLDWB-62AASHTO 2004 (US)WB-62AASHTO 2004 (US)WB-62AASHTO 2004 (US)WB-62
AASHTO 2004
(US)WB-62AASHTO 2004 (US)WB-62AASHTO 2004 (US)WB-62
AASHTO 2004 (US)WB-62AASHTO 2004 (US)WB-62AASHTO 2004 (US)WB-62
AAS
HT
O
20
04
(U
S)WB-62AASHTO 2004 (US)WB-62AASHTO 2004 (US)WB-62AASHTO 2004 (US)WB-62AASHTO 2004 (US)WB-62AASHTO 2004 (US)WB-62AASHTO 2004 (US)WB-62AASHTO 2004 (US)WB-62AASHTO 2004 (US)WB-62AASHTO 2004 (US)WB-62AASH
T
O
2004 (US)WB-62AASHTO 2004 (US)WB-62AAS
H
TO
2
00
4
(
US
)WB-62AASHTO 2004 (US)WB-62AASHTO 2004 (US)WB-62AASHTO 2004 (US)WB-62AASHTO 2004 (US)WB-62AASHTO 2004
(
U
S
)WB-62AASHTO 2004 (US)12’X 580’ ACCEL10’SHLD10’SHLD12’ X 880’ ACCEL10’ SHLD10’ SHLD11’INP11’INP11’INP10’ SHLD11’ INP11’ INP11’ INP11’ INP11’ INP11’ INP12’ AUX12’ AUX10’ SHLD8’ SHLD14’9’9’14’16’16’14’14’15’15’12’12’12’12’1
6
’15’15’12’ INP11’ INP11’ INP12’ INP12’ INP12’ INP10’ SHLD INP12’ AUX8’ SHLD14’14’14’ LTL14’ RTL14’12’12’ LTL12’ RTL12’ RTL12’14’14’ LTL12’12’14’ LTL12’14’14’16’14’ LTL12’14’16’16’14’12’14’12’4’ SHLD4’ SHLD14’ RTL12’12’14 LTL14’12’4’ SHLD14’
14’14’
10’ S
H
L
D
14’12’4’ SHLD16’12’14’10’ SHLD12’14’16’16’16’8’ S
HL
D
21.8’ MIN
17’17’22’10’ SHLD14’14’16’10’ SHLD12’14’14’ LTL12’12’16’12’14’10’ SHLD10’ SHLD INP19’ MIN22’11’ INP11’ INP11’ INP10’ SHLD16’16’16’16’16’14’16’10’10’10’10’16’12’ WALK/TRAIL12’ WALK/TRAIL12’ WALK/TRAIL12’ WALK/TRAIL12’ WALK/TRAIL12’ WALK/TRAIL11’INP11’INP11’11’(CONST. UNDER SP 2706-222)INPLACE DETENTION POND
POSSIBLE POND LOCATIONPOSSIBLE POND LOCATIONPOSSIBLE POND LOCATIONPOSSIBLE POND LOCATIONPOSSIBLE POND LOCATIONPOSSIBLE POND LOCATIONPOSSIBLE POND LOCATIONINPLACE POND(SP2706-222)POSSIBLE PONDING LOCATIONCURB & GUTTER, RAISED ISLANDBRIDGES & RETAINING WALLSPAVED SHOULDERROADWAYLEGENDINPLACE POND(SP2706-222)POSSIBLE PONDING LOCATIONCURB & GUTTER, RAISED ISLANDBRIDGES & RETAINING WALLSPAVED SHOULDERROADWAYStudy Session Meeting of January 24, 2011 (Item No. 4) Subject: Highway 100 Project UpdatePage 39