Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011/11/21 - ADMIN - Agenda Packets - City Council - RegularAGENDA NOVEMBER 21, 2011 6:15 p.m. SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING -- Westwood Room 1. Call to Order 1a. Roll Call 2. Closed Executive Session Attorney-Client meeting to discuss pending litigation, i.e., Javinsky-Wenzek v City of St. Louis Park, with the City's Attorneys 3. Adjournment 7:00 p.m. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY -- Council Chambers 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes 3a. Economic Development Authority Minutes November 7, 2011 4. Approval of Agenda 5. Reports 5a. Economic Development Authority Vendor Claims 6. Old Business 7. New Business 7a. First Amendment to the Redevelopment Contract with Duke Realty Limited Partnership Recommended Action: Motion to Adopt Resolution approving the First Amendment to the Contract for Private Redevelopment By and Between the City of St. Louis Park, St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority and Duke Realty. Since the City is a party to the above Contract the City Council will likewise be asked to approve the proposed First Amendment. Such approval will be on the November 21st Consent Calendar. 7b. Third Amendment to Redevelopment Contract with Aquila Senior LLC Recommended Action: Motion to adopt the resolution approving the Third Amendment to the Contract for Private Redevelopment By and Between St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority and Aquila Senior LLC. 8. Communications 9. Adjournment 7:30 p.m. CITY COUNCIL MEETING -- Council Chambers 1. Call to Order 1a. Pledge of Allegiance 1b. Roll Call Meeting of November 21, 2011 City Council Agenda 2. Presentations -- None 3. Approval of Minutes 3a. City Council Meeting Minutes of November 7, 2011 3b. Special City Council Meeting Minutes of November 14, 2011 4. Approval of Agenda and Items on Consent Calendar NOTE: The Consent Calendar lists those items of business which are considered to be routine and/or which need no discussion. Consent items are acted upon by one motion. If discussion is desired by either a Councilmember or a member of the audience, that item may be moved to an appropriate section of the regular agenda for discussion. The items for the Consent Calendar are listed on the last page of the Agenda. Recommended Action: Motion to approve the Agenda as presented and items listed on the Consent Calendar; and to waive reading of all resolutions and ordinances. (Alternatively: Motion to add or remove items from the agenda, or move items from Consent Calendar to regular agenda for discussion.) 5. Boards and Commissions -- None 6. Public Hearings 6a. Public Hearing – 2012 Liquor License Fees Recommended Action: Mayor to close public hearing. Motion to approve Resolution adopting 2012 liquor license fees for the license term March 1, 2012 through March 1, 2013 pursuant to M.S.A. Ch. 340A and section 3-59 of the St. Louis Park City Code. 6b. Public Hearing on Greensboro Condominium Association Housing Improvement Area (HIA) Recommended Action: Mayor to open Public Hearing, take testimony, and then close the Public Hearing. Ÿ Motion to Adopt Resolution approving a housing improvement fee for the Greensboro Condominium Association Housing Improvement Area pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 428A.11 to 428A.21. Ÿ Motion to Adopt First Reading of an ordinance establishing the Greensboro Condominium Association Housing Improvement Area pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 428A.11 to 428A.21 and to set Second Reading for December 5, 2011. 7. Requests, Petitions, and Communications from the Public -- None 8. Resolutions, Ordinances, Motions and Discussion Items 8a. Fretham Twelfth Addition – Preliminary Plat Recommended Action: Motion to Adopt Resolution approving the Preliminary Plat for six single-family lots known as Fretham Twelfth Addition. 8b. Amending the Plan by Neighborhood Section of Comprehensive Plan Recommended Action: Motion to Adopt Resolution amending the Plan by Neighborhood section of Comprehensive Plan and authorize publication of summary resolution. 9. Communication Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. To make arrangements, please call the Administration Department at 952/924-2525 (TDD 952/924-2518) at least 96 hours in advance of meeting. Meeting of November 21, 2011 City Council Agenda CONSENT CALENDAR 4a. Adopt Resolution supporting the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) in creating and implementing a management plan to educate, control and prevent the spread of aquatic invasive species through the watershed area 4b. Adopt Resolution authorizing parking restrictions on Gamble Drive east of Park Place Boulevard 4c. Adopt Resolution authorizing parking restrictions on the 5600 block of Lake Street 4d. Adopt Resolution authorizing the elimination of permit parking restrictions in front of 3300 Huntington Avenue and 2716 Dakota Avenue 4e. Adopt Resolution Accepting the Project Report, Establishing Improvement Project No. 2010-1300 Approving Plans and Specifications, and Authorizing Advertisement for Bids for Improvement Project No. 2010-1300 4f. Adopt Resolution approving the First Amendment to the Contract for Private Redevelopment By and Between the City of St. Louis Park, St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority and Duke Realty 4g. Approve for filing Housing Authority Minutes September 14, 2011 4h. Approve for filing Vendor Claims St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority and regular City Council meetings are carried live on Civic TV cable channel 17 and replays are frequent; check www.parktv.org for the schedule. The meetings are also streamed live on the internet at www.parktv.org, and saved for Video on Demand replays. The agenda is posted on Fridays on the official city bulletin board in the lobby of City Hall and on the text display on Civic TV cable channel 17. The agenda and full packet are available by noon on Friday on the city’s website. Meeting Date: November 21, 2011 Agenda Item #: 3a UNOFFICIAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA NOVEMBER 7, 2011 1. Call to Order President Finkelstein called the meeting to order at 7:20 p.m. Commissioners present: President Phil Finkelstein, Jeff Jacobs, Anne Mavity, Julia Ross, and Sue Santa. Commissioners absent: Paul Omodt and Susan Sanger. Staff present: Executive Director (Mr. Harmening), Director of Community Development (Mr. Locke), Economic Development Coordinator (Mr. Hunt), and Recording Secretary (Ms. Hughes). 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes 3a. Economic Development Authority Minutes of October 17, 2011 The minutes were approved as presented. 4. Approval of Agenda The agenda was approved as presented. 5. Reports - None 6. Old Business - None 7. New Business 7a. Third Amendment to Redevelopment Contract with PNMC Holdings EDA Resolution No. 11-15 Mr. Hunt presented the staff report and explained that the EDA entered into a contract for private redevelopment with PNMC Holdings in 1993 which called for the phased construction of much of Park Nicollet’s campus, including the 3850 Building, 3900 Building, and the parking ramp serving the Clinic. He stated that under Phase II of the Contract, Park Nicollet was required to construct at least 145,000 square feet of medical office space on its campus and Park Nicollet had constructed 49,310 square feet and the remaining 95,690 square feet had not occurred. As a result, Park Nicollet is in default of EDA Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 3a) Page 2 Subject: EDA Meeting Minutes of November 7, 2011 the agreement. He advised that a proposed settlement had been reached with Park Nicollet which addresses the default. To formalize the proposed agreement, the parties the parties have agreed to enter into a Third Amendment to the Redevelopment Contract. In summary, the agreement caps the qualified costs for which Park Nicollet would be eligible for reimbursement at approximately $2.3 million and reduces this amount by $500,000, resulting in a net remaining amount of tax increment of $1,815,000. He indicated that final payment in 2012 would also result in early termination of the contract and early decertification of the Excelsior Boulevard HSTI TIF District by nine years, adding approximately $1 million or 1.4% in tax capacity to the City’s total tax base. Commissioner Mavity expressed thanks to City staff and Park Nicollet for reaching a settlement on this complex agreement. She requested confirmation that the settlement will leave open the possibility for further development on the site. She also requested further information regarding the direct benefits to the City as a result of the early decertification of the TIF District. Mr. Hunt replied that further development on the site will be possible under the terms of the settlement. He stated that under the settlement Park Nicollet’s assistance would essentially be reduced by more than $800,000 and that the total assistance to which it is entitled would also be capped. He explained that Park Nicollet was entitled to receive up to $9 million and to date, Park Nicollet had incurred approximately $6.2 million in remediation expenses, resulting in substantial savings to the City. He added that by terminating the TIF District early, approximately $1 million will be placed onto the City’s tax rolls by 2013 instead of 2022. It was moved by Commissioner Mavity, seconded by Commissioner Ross, to approve EDA Resolution No. 11-15 Approving a Third Amendment to Contract for Private Redevelopment Between the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority, PNMC Holdings, and Park Nicollet Health Services. The motion passed 5-0 (Commissioners Omodt and Sanger absent). 7b. First Amendment to the Redevelopment Contract with M & L Anodizing Properties, LLC. EDA Resolutions No. 11-13 and 11-14 Mr. Hunt presented the staff report and advised that M & L Anodizing Properties, aka Hardcoat Inc., plans to acquire the former Flame Metals property at 7317 West Lake Street and plans to renovate the building, construct a small addition and relocate its operations there. He stated that Hardcoat plans to close on its financing this week and immediately commence renovation work with the entire project to be completed by summer 2012. He explained that the amendment provides an additional $80,000 in financial assistance to help facilitate the proposed project for total funding of $500,000 to be provided on a reimbursement basis with funds derived from the pooled tax increment generated by nine TIF Districts. He noted that the amendment also extends the commencement date to July 1st and extends the completion date to the end of next year. He indicated that the amendment also sets the minimum market value of the site at $2.4 million which is lower than the $2.6 amount that Ehlers included in its assumptions, which will likely generate approximately $166,000 in total tax increment net present EDA Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 3a) Page 3 Subject: EDA Meeting Minutes of November 7, 2011 value over the nine year term, which is less than the previous estimate of $190,000. He also presented the proposed second interfund agreement which allows the EDA to reimburse itself an additional $80,000 in connection with the administration of the Hardcoat TIF District. Commissioner Santa requested further information regarding the reasons for the amendment and what caused the delays experienced by Hardcoat. Mr. Hunt explained that Hardcoat has been through a litany of requirements from the Department of Agriculture which required further environmental testing on the property, resulting in substantial delays to both closing as well as commencing the renovation and expansion. He indicated as a result of these delays, Hardcoat had incurred substantial additional costs resulting in over $500,000 in additional expenses and Hardcoat had asked if the EDA would be willing to contribute another $80,000 to help move the project forward. Mr. Michael Kelner, owner of Hardcoat Inc., appeared before the Economic Development Authority and expressed thanks to the EDA and City staff for their help throughout this process. He advised that as of last Friday, he received a written response from the Department of Agriculture indicating its acceptance of their plan and Hardcoat has completed all remediation on the property from previous spills that occurred over thirty years ago. He stated that all dirt has been removed and replaced and they are ready to commence the project. He added that Hardcoat is scheduled to close on Thursday, November 10th. Commissioner Mavity stated that the EDA is supporting this because it feels this is in the City’s best interest. She indicated the Construction Assistance Program seeks to create jobs in the community and improve existing buildings. She requested further information regarding the number of employees at Hardcoat. She also requested clarification regarding the contract’s terms related to the conditions under which the CAP Loan would not be a forgivable loan. Mr. Kelner advised at the time that Hardcoat made its initial presentation to the EDA, there were 12 employees working for Hardcoat and today, Hardcoat employs 18 people on a full-time basis for a net increase of six employees. Mr. Hunt explained that the contract requires Hardcoat to keep and hold the property in good repair for five years and if it does not, or if the property is sold, Hardcoat would be required to repay the entirety of the funding provided to it by the EDA. It was moved by Commissioner Santa, seconded by Commissioner Ross, to approve EDA Resolution No. 11-13 approving a First Amendment of a Contract for Private Redevelopment By and Between the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority and M & L Anodizing Properties, LLC. The motion passed 5-0 (Commissioners Omodt and Sanger absent). EDA Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 3a) Page 4 Subject: EDA Meeting Minutes of November 7, 2011 It was moved by Commissioner Santa, seconded by Commissioner Ross, to approve EDA Resolution No. 11-14 Authorizing Interfund Loan for Advance of Certain Costs in Connection with the Hardcoat Tax Increment Financing District. The motion passed 5-0 (Commissioners Omodt and Sanger absent). 8. Communications - None 9. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 7:36 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Secretary President Meeting Date: November 21, 2011 Agenda Item #: 5a Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance Presentation Other: EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other: Vendor Claims Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other: TITLE: Vendor Claims. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to accept for filing Vendor Claims for the period October 8, 2011 through November 11, 2011. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. BACKGROUND: The Finance Department prepares this report for council’s review. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: None. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. Attachments: Vendor Claims Prepared by: Connie Neubeck, Account Clerk 11/16/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:15:50R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 1Page -Council Check Summary 11/11/2011 -10/8/2011 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 100.00HOIGAARD 2010A DEBT SERV G&A FISCAL AGENT FEESBOND TRUST SERVICES CORP 100.00 5,780.75DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A LEGAL SERVICESCAMPBELL KNUTSON PROF ASSOC 5,780.75 34.847015 WALKER-REYNOLDS WELD PROP HEATING GASCENTERPOINT ENERGY 34.84 53.00DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A TRAININGCITIZENS INDEPENDENT BANK 32.00DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A MEETING EXPENSE 85.00 5,458.00DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESHOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP INC 5,458.00 162.00AMERICAN INN PROP DEVELOPMENT LEGAL SERVICESKENNEDY & GRAVEN 162.00 5,027.787015 WALKER-REYNOLDS WELD PROP OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESKRECH, O'BRIEN, MUELLER & WASS 5,027.78 3,000.00HRA LEVY G&A LEGAL SERVICESLOCKRIDGE GRINDAL NAUEN PLLP 3,000.00 5,000.00DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESMCCD 5,000.00 420.00DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSMNCAR EXCHANGE 420.00 224.39DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A TELEPHONENEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 224.39 Report Totals 25,292.76 EDA Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 5a) Subject: EDA Vendor Claims Page 2 Meeting Date: November 21, 2011 Agenda Item #: 7a Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance Presentation Other: EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other: Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other: TITLE: First Amendment to the Redevelopment Contract with Duke Realty Limited Partnership. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution approving the First Amendment to the Contract for Private Redevelopment By and Between the City of St. Louis Park, St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority and Duke Realty. Since the City is a party to the above Contract the City Council will likewise be asked to approve the proposed First Amendment. Such approval will be on the November 21st Consent Calendar. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the EDA support correcting the legal description within the Redevelopment Contract as specified in the proposed First Amendment? BACKGROUND: On December 17, 2007 the EDA and City approved a Redevelopment Contract with Duke Realty related to The West End project near I-394 and Highway 100. This contract was substantially modified to add the West End Apartments and change the schedule for building via an Amended and Restated Redevelopment Contract approved on May 17, 2010. The project essentially consists of three components – a lifestyle retail complex, an apartment building and a series of Class A office buildings. The 350,000 SF lifestyle center is complete and 80% of the retail space is leased. The upscale, 120–unit apartment building is expected to break ground late next spring. Given the current office market, construction on the first of what is expected to be three or four Class A office buildings (with 1.1 million SF between them) is not likely to occur until the required commencement date which is March 1, 2014. On October 27th, Duke Realty officially notified the City that it was selling the 1600 Tower and MoneyGram office buildings to the Blackstone Group. These are the existing office buildings across the street from The West End. Duke will continue to own The West End and remains committed to building the 1.1 million square feet of future office buildings called for in the Redevelopment Contract with the EDA and City. The 1600 Tower and MoneyGram building are not part of The West End project even though they have been carefully integrated into the redevelopment. The EDA is not required to review or approve of the transfer of the properties to the Blackstone Group. However, when the Redevelopment Contract was amended and restated in May 2010, the legal description that was used inadvertently included the 1600 Tower and MoneyGram office building site. This was an error. The parcel on which these office buildings sit was not part of the original legal description for the Redevelopment Contract with Duke in 2007. The proper method for correcting this inadvertent error is through an amendment to the Redevelopment Contract. EDA Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 7a) Page 2 Subject: First Amendment to the Redevelopment Contract with Duke Realty Limited Partnership Proposed First Amendment The proposed First Amendment corrects the legal description related to The West End project contained within the Redevelopment Contract with Duke Realty. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: There is no financial impact to the EDA or City for correcting the legal description within the Redevelopment Contract with Duke Realty. This action is necessary for completion of the ownership transfer of the 1600 Tower and MoneyGram office buildings to the Blackstone Group. VISION CONSIDERATION: The West End project is consistent with the City’s Vision; especially the Strategic Directions concerning gathering places, public art, trails, sidewalks and transportation. Attachments: Resolution Approving First Amendment First Amendment to Redevelopment Contract with Duke Realty Prepared by: Greg Hunt, Economic Development Coordinator Reviewed by: Kevin Locke, Community Development Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, EDA Executive Director and City Manager EDA Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 7a) Page 3 Subject: First Amendment to the Redevelopment Contract with Duke Realty Limited Partnership ST. LOUIS PARK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY RESOLUTION NO. 11-____ RESOLUTION APPROVING A FIRST AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE REDEVELOPMENT AMONG THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK, THE ST. LOUIS PARK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND DUKE REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP BE IT RESOLVED By the Board of Commissioners ("Board") of the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority ("Authority") as follows: Section 1. Recitals. 1.01. The Authority is currently administering its Redevelopment Project No. 1 ("Project") pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047 ("HRA Act"), and within the Project has established The West End Tax Increment Financing District (“TIF District”). 1.02. The Authority and the City of St. Louis Park (“City”) entered into an Amended and Restated Contract for Private Redevelopment Dated as of May 17, 2010 (the “Contract”), regarding redevelopment of a portion of the property within the TIF District. 1.03. The parties have determined to a need to revise the Contract in certain respects, and to that end have prepared a First Amendment to Amended and Restated Contract for Private Redevelopment (the “First Amendment”). 1.04. The Board has reviewed the First Amendment and finds that the approval and execution thereof and performance of the Authority's obligations thereunder are in the best interest of the City and its residents. Section 2. Authority Approval; Other Proceedings. 2.01. The First Amendment as presented to the Board is hereby in all respects approved, subject to modifications that do not alter the substance of the transaction and that are approved by the President and Executive Director, provided that execution of the documents by such officials shall be conclusive evidence of approval. 2.02. The President and Executive Director are hereby authorized to execute on behalf of the Authority the First Amendment and any documents referenced therein requiring execution by the Authority, and to carry out, on behalf of the Authority its obligations thereunder. 2.03. Authority staff and consultants are authorized to take any actions necessary to carry out the intent of this resolution. EDA Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 7a) Page 4 Subject: First Amendment to the Redevelopment Contract with Duke Realty Limited Partnership Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the Economic Development Authority November 21, 2011 Executive Director President Attest Secretary EDA Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 7a) Page 5 Subject: First Amendment to the Redevelopment Contract with Duke Realty Limited Partnership FIRST AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE REDEVELOPMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made as of the 21st day of November, 2011, by and between the CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK, a Minnesota municipal corporation, (the “City”), and the ST. LOUIS PARK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, a public body corporate and politic (the “Authority”), established pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.090 to 469.1081 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”), and DUKE REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, an Indiana limited partnership (the “Redeveloper”). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Authority was created pursuant to the Act and was authorized to transact business and exercise its powers by a resolution of the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park (the “City”); and WHEREAS, the Authority has undertaken a program to promote redevelopment of land that is characterized by blight and blighting factors within the City, and in this connection the Authority has created Redevelopment Project No. 1 (hereinafter referred to as the “Project”) in the City, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047 (the “HRA Act”); and WHEREAS, the Authority has established a redevelopment tax increment financing district known as The West End Tax Increment Financing District (the “TIF District”) within the Project and adopted a financing plan (the “TIF Plan”) for the TIF District in order to facilitate redevelopment of certain property in the Project, all pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 to 469.179; and WHEREAS, the Authority, City and Redeveloper entered into an Amended and Restated Contract for Private Redevelopment dated May 17, 2010 (the “Contract”), which described the parties’ respective responsibilities regarding redevelopment of certain property in the TIF District (referred to as the “Redevelopment Property”); and WHEREAS, the parties have determined a need to modify the Contract solely to correct the legal description of the Redevelopment Property and the Adjacent Property; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual obligations of the parties hereto, each of them does hereby covenant and agree with the other as follows: 1. Schedule A to the Contract is revised to read as attached hereto. 2. The Contract remains in full force and effect, and is not modified except as expressly provided herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Authority and the City have caused this Agreement to be duly executed in its respective name and behalf and its seal to be hereunto duly affixed and the Redeveloper has caused this Agreement to be duly executed in its name and behalf as of the date first above written. EDA Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 7a) Page 6 Subject: First Amendment to the Redevelopment Contract with Duke Realty Limited Partnership ST. LOUIS PARK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY By Its President By Executive Director STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of November, 2011 by Phillip Finkelstein and Thomas Harmening, the President and Executive Director, respectively, of the Economic Development Authority of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, on behalf of the Authority. Notary Public EDA Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 7a) Page 7 Subject: First Amendment to the Redevelopment Contract with Duke Realty Limited Partnership CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK By Its Mayor By City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of November, 2011 by Jeff Jacobs and Thomas Harmening, the Mayor and City Manager, respectively, of the of the City of St. Louis Park, on behalf of the City. Notary Public EDA Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 7a) Page 8 Subject: First Amendment to the Redevelopment Contract with Duke Realty Limited Partnership DUKE REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP By ____________________________________, the Senior Vice President of Duke Realty Corporation, an Indiana corporation and the general partner of the above-named limited partnership STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of ___________, 2011 by Pat Mascia, the Senior Vice president of Duke Realty Corporation, an Indiana corporation and the general partner of Duke Realty Limited Partnership, an Indiana limited partnership, on behalf of the partnership. Notary Public EDA Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 7a) Page 9 Subject: First Amendment to the Redevelopment Contract with Duke Realty Limited Partnership SCHEDULE A REDEVELOPMENT PROPERTY Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4, Block 1; Lot 2, Block 2; and Outlot A, The Shops at West End, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. GOLDEN VALLEY PROPERTY Parcel 5: Tract 1: Lot 1, Block 4, "Kavlis Cedardale" and that part of the vacated alley in said Block 4, lying East of the center line thereof and between the extensions across it of the North and South lines of said Lot 1, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Tract 2: That part of the North 693.61 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 30, Township 29, Range 24 lying Westerly and Southerly of State Trunk Highway No. 100, also known as the Belt Line Highway, Hennepin County, Minnesota. EXCEPT that portion taken by the State of Minnesota pursuant to Partial Final Certificate recorded July 21, 1993 as Document No. 2401510. (Torrens Property-Certificate of Title No. 1012734) Parcel 6: That part of vacated Raleigh Avenue and of vacated Douglas Avenue all according to the plat of "Kavlis Cedardale" lying Westerly of the Westerly right of way line of State Trunk Highway No. 100 as described in the Final Certificate recorded in Book 412 of Miscellaneous Records, page 148 in the office of the County Recorder and lying Southerly of a line drawn from the Southwest corner of Tract E, Registered Land Survey No. 864 and passing through a point on the East line of said Tract E distant 18.18 feet North of the Southeast corner of said Tract E, Hennepin County, Minnesota. EXCEPT that portion taken by the State of Minnesota pursuant to Partial Final Certificate recorded July 21, 1993 as Document No. 2401510. (Torrens Property-Certificate of Title No. 1012686) EDA Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 7a) Page 10 Subject: First Amendment to the Redevelopment Contract with Duke Realty Limited Partnership Parcel 7: Lots 2, 3, 4 and 6, Block 4 except that portion of said Lots taken for Belt Line Highway; Lots 7 to 12 inclusive, Block 4 and that part of Raleigh Avenue vacated lying between the Westerly extension of the South line of said Lot 7 and the North line of said Lot 12 and that part of the vacated alley in said Block 4 lying between the Easterly extensions of the North and South lines of said Lot 7 and between the South line of said Lot 9 and the North line of said Lot 11 and that part of the West 1/2 of the vacated alley in said Block 4 lying between the extensions of the North and South lines of said Lot 8 and between the North and South lines of said Lot 12; ALL in "Kavlis Cedardale", according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. That part of the following described property: That part of vacated Raleigh and Douglas Avenues as shown on the plat of "Kavlis Cedardale" lying between the extensions across said Avenues of the South and West lines of Lot 7, Block 4 and that part of said vacated Douglas Avenue adjoining Lots 6 and 7, Block 4 of said plat lying between the Westerly line of Belt Line Highway and the extension across said Avenue of the West line of said Lot 7, Block 4, "Kavlis Cedardale"; Which lies Northerly of a straight line extending between the Southwest corner of Tract E, Registered Land Survey No. 864, Hennepin County, Minnesota and the Westerly right-of-way of State Trunk Highway 100 passing through a point on the East line of said Tract E distant 18.18 feet North of the Southeast corner of said Tract E as measured along said East line, Hennepin County, Minnesota. EXCEPT that portion taken by the State of Minnesota pursuant to Partial Final Certificate recorded July 21, 1993 as Document No. 2401510. (Torrens Property-Certificate of Title No. 1012678) Parcel 8: That part of the South 60 feet of the North 753.61 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 30, Township 29, Range 24, lying West of the Belt Line Highway, Hennepin County, Minnesota. EXCEPT that portion taken by the State of Minnesota pursuant to Partial Final Certificate recorded July 21, 1993 as Document No. 2401510. (Torrens Property-Certificate of Title No. 1012680) ADJACENT PROPERTY Lot 1, Block 2, The Shops at West End, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Meeting Date: November 21, 2011 Agenda Item #: 7b Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance Presentation Other: EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other: Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other: TITLE: Third Amendment to Redevelopment Contract with Aquila Senior LLC. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to adopt the resolution approving the Third Amendment to the Contract for Private Redevelopment By and Between St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority and Aquila Senior LLC. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the EDA support the removal of the asset restrictions on the sale of the initial units and removal of the income and asset restrictions on the re-sale units under the Redevelopment Contract related to Aquila Commons? BACKGROUND: On October 4, 2004, a Redevelopment Contract with Stonebridge Development (Aquila Senior, LLC) was approved and a Housing TIF District was created to facilitate the redevelopment of the former Talmud Torah School property located at 8200 West 33rd Street. As required under the Contract, the Redeveloper was to demolish the existing school building and construct a 106-unit senior cooperative housing development in its place called Aquila Commons. In return, the EDA agreed to provide TIF assistance for the project in the maximum principal amount of $1,050,000. Construction of Aquila Commons was fully completed in December 2007. After nearly four years, 15 of the original 106 units remain unsold. In addition, some of the previously sold units are now being resold. Currently there are 5 units up for resale. Thus the total number of units currently for sale in the building is 20. At the October 24th Study Session, the EDA was provided with an update on sales and marketing efforts at Aquila Commons, the difficulty facing both, and proposed actions to stimulate unit sales so as to make the building fully occupied and the project successful. Need to Revisit Asset and Income Requirements within the Contract At the time the Aquila Commons project was under consideration it was the intent of the EDA that the project be primarily marketed to St. Louis Park senior residents in need of affordable, for-sale, housing. In compliance with state requirements for Housing TIF Districts, 95% of the housing units (that being 100 units) within the project were required to be occupied by individuals whose family income was at or below certain federal income requirements. Although not required by law, the EDA applied this income restriction to subsequent buyers as well. In addition, the EDA imposed its own restrictions on the total assets buyers could have. This restriction on total assets also applied to subsequent purchasers. Thus, the Contract included restrictions on both income and assets of both original and subsequent unit purchasers within the project. The requirements are as follows: EDA Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 7b) Page 2 Subject: Third Amendment to Redevelopment Contract with Aquila Senior LLC (i) At least 40 % (or 42) of the unit interests will be sold to persons with a household income not exceeding 80% of the median income for the Minneapolis-St. Paul metropolitan area, adjusted for family size. (Currently, 60% of the units within Aquila Commons have been sold to persons with household incomes at or below this threshold). (ii) At least 55% (or 58) of the unit interests will be sold to persons with household income not exceeding 100% of the metropolitan area income median income. (iii)For all units subject to either clause (i) or clause (ii) above, the buyer’s total assets as of the date of sale may not exceed $500,000 on a net present value basis (the “Maximum Assets”), determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Maximum Assets will be adjusted on January 1, 2011 and January 1 of every fifth year thereafter through the Termination Date, based on the cumulative increase in the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Price Index—All Urban Consumers for the preceding five-year period. This asset limit may be increased by up to an additional $250,000 based upon the most recent assessed value of a buyer’s principal residence as expressed on the city’s tax rolls or the sale price of a buyer’s principal residence. The $250,000 limit may be adjusted upwards annually by three percent (3%) commencing on January 1, 2006. The above requirements meant that the total asset limit for persons purchasing units within Aquila Commons was originally set at $750,000 and has been subsequently adjusted annually. On January 1, 2011, the maximum total asset limit was adjusted to $839,513 or less depending on the value of the buyer’s home. At first blush this limit would appear to be a considerable sum under which many seniors would expect to qualify. However, the reality is that many St. Louis Park seniors have proven to be careful stewards of their assets and by the time they combine the entirety of their savings and total pensions, along with net proceeds from the sale of their principal residence in St. Louis Park, they exceed the EDA’s asset limits. This prevents them from purchasing a unit within Aquila Commons. In some cases, potential purchasers did not have pensions but were provided net payouts at the time of their retirement. Thus their total assets well exceeded the asset restriction yet the income generated from their assets was very modest. The asset restrictions are making it difficult for many of our residents to purchase units within Aquila Commons resulting in a significant number of unsold units. The sale of units within Aquila Commons has become an issue that will likely get worse as more of the original units start to turnover. While some of the difficulty in selling units is certainly attributable to the downturn in the real estate market, in many cases the asset restrictions have become the major stumbling block to closing sales. Sales have been lost due to these asset restrictions and, as a result, the property is beginning to develop a stigma within the local real estate community as being a difficult place to purchase and re-sell units. Staff investigated whether other coops have a similar provision and, as it turns out, Aquila Commons appears to be the only senior cooperative housing project in Minnesota to have restrictions on purchaser’s assets. As stated previously, the EDA requires that units being resold must also meet income and asset restrictions. The EDA is not required to have these restrictions. State and federal housing laws pertaining to projects like Aquila Commons only stipulate that the initial buyers be income qualified and include no such restriction on subsequent purchasers. The EDA imposed these EDA Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 7b) Page 3 Subject: Third Amendment to Redevelopment Contract with Aquila Senior LLC restrictions on the resale of units at Aquila Commons too. The intent was to continue to ensure Aquila Commons was protected for seniors with modest incomes. However the 3% unit appreciation limit built into the coop legal structure ensures that the property will continue to be an affordable housing option for St. Louis Park seniors into the future. The reality is that the income and asset restrictions create an obstacle for unit owners (and their heirs) when it comes time to sell. As noted above, there are currently 5 units up for resale in the building – including units which have been on the market for more than two years. In some cases, the re-sales are due to the original buyer passing away and the unsold units are preventing estates from being settled. Given the difficulty of reselling units, the number of units up for re-sale at the same time is likely to become an increasing issue. Recommendations The income restrictions for initial buyers at Aquila Commons need to be retained in order for the project to remain in compliance with statutory Housing TIF District requirements. The income restrictions on the initial buyers will ensure seniors of modest means will benefit from the EDA’s investment in making Aquila Commons a reality. The asset restriction included in the Contract for all purchasers at Aquila Commons, while well intended, has proven to be an impediment to unit sales and does not necessarily accomplish the EDA’s goal of creating an affordable, for-sale, housing option for local seniors. Having units continue unsold and vacant does not fulfill this goal, nor does it benefit the project or the coop community. In fact, the more units remain vacant the greater the financial burden on the coop to pay for the building’s maintenance costs. Lifting the asset restriction would be consistent with both state and federal housing project requirements and, in so doing, would broaden the market of potential buyers, streamline the administrative process for qualifying those buyers and ultimately enable more units to be sold. For these reasons, Staff recommends that the asset restriction on all unit purchasers at Aquila Commons be lifted. Regarding the resale of units, it is recommended that both the income requirements and asset restrictions be lifted. This too would be consistent with state and federal housing project requirements. Eliminating restrictions will make it easier for St. Louis Park residents and their families to sell their units and ensure the continued vitality of the Aquila Commons property. The buyer interest in Aquila Commons has made it clear that Aquila Commons is meeting a community need. Terms of the Proposed Third Amendment Consistent with the discussion at the October 24th Study Session, the proposed Third Amendment to the Redevelopment Contract with Aquila Senior LLC removes the asset restrictions on the sale of the initial units and the removes the income and asset restrictions on the re-sale units at Aquila Commons. It also allows that if a unit is purchased by a third party for a person (or persons) who meet the income requirements and who occupy the unit as their principal residence, that unit would qualify as meeting the income requirements. This provision would immediately free up one of the six units without income requirements and could stimulate the sale of the remaining original units. EDA Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 7b) Page 4 Subject: Third Amendment to Redevelopment Contract with Aquila Senior LLC FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Modifying the asset and income requirements contained in the Redevelopment Contract with Aquila Senior, LLC as proposed will stimulate unit sales within Aquila Commons so as to make it fully occupied and the project successful. VISION CONSIDERATION: Aquila Commons is consistent with the City’s vision to be a community of diverse, high quality housing. Attachments: Resolution of Approval Third Amendment to the Redevelopment Contract Prepared by: Greg Hunt, Economic Development Coordinator Reviewed by: Kevin Locke, Community Development Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, EDA Executive Director and City Manager EDA Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 7b) Page 5 Subject: Third Amendment to Redevelopment Contract with Aquila Senior LLC ST. LOUIS PARK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY RESOLUTION NO. 11-____ RESOLUTION APPROVING THIRD AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE REDEVELOPMENT BETWEEN ST. LOUIS PARK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND AQUILA SENIOR, LLC BE IT RESOLVED By the Board of Commissioners ("Board") of the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority ("Authority") as follows: Section 1. Recitals. 1.01. The Authority has determined a need to exercise the powers of a housing and redevelopment authority, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections. 469.090 to 469.108 ("EDA Act"), and is currently administering Redevelopment Project No. 1 ("Redevelopment Project") pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047 ("HRA Act"). 1.02. The Authority and Aquila Senior, LLC (the “Redeveloper") have entered into that certain Contract for Private Redevelopment dated as of October 4, 2004. (the “Contract”), setting forth the terms and conditions of redevelopment of certain property within the Redevelopment Project, generally described as the former Talmud Torah School site. 1.03. The Authority and the Redeveloper have entered into that certain First Amendment to Contract for Private Redevelopment dated as of May 16, 2005 (the “First Amendment”). 1.04. The Authority and the Redeveloper have entered into that certain Second Amendment to Contract for Private Redevelopment dated as of March 20, 2006 (the “Second Amendment”). 1.05. The Redeveloper has determined that due to the ongoing economic downturn the asset and income requirements of the Project significantly impact the ability to initially market and sell new units, and resell units under the original and revised asset and income requirements of the Project. 1.06. The Board has reviewed the Third Amendment to Contract for Private Redevelopment (the “Third Amendment”) providing for revision of the asset and income requirements in the Contract, and finds that the execution thereof and performance of the Authority's obligations thereunder are in the best interest of the City and its residents. Section 2. Authority Approval; Further Proceedings. 2.01. The Third Amendment as presented to the Board is hereby in all respects approved, subject to modifications that do not alter the substance of the transaction and that are approved by the President and Executive Director, provided that execution of the documents by such officials shall be conclusive evidence of approval. EDA Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 7b) Page 6 Subject: Third Amendment to Redevelopment Contract with Aquila Senior LLC 2.02. The President and Executive Director are hereby authorized to execute on behalf of the Authority the Contract and any documents referenced therein requiring execution by the Authority, and to carry out, on behalf of the Authority its obligations thereunder. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the Economic Development Authority November 21, 2011 Executive Director President Attest Secretary EDA Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 7b) Page 7 Subject: Third Amendment to Redevelopment Contract with Aquila Senior LLC THIRD AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE REDVELOPMENT THIS THIRD AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE REDVELOPMENT (this “Second Amendment”), made as of the _____ day of __________, 2011, by and between the ST. LOUIS PARK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (the “Authority”), a public body corporate and politic under the laws of Minnesota, and AQUILA SENIOR, LLC (the “Redeveloper”), a Minnesota limited liability corporation. WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the Authority and the Redeveloper have entered into that certain Contract for Private Redevelopment dated as of October 4, 2004 (the “Redevelopment Contract” or the “Contract”), providing for the redevelopment of certain property defined in the Contract; and WHEREAS, the Authority and the Redeveloper have entered into that certain First Amendment to Contract for Private Redevelopment dated as of May 16, 2005 (the “First Amendment”); and WHEREAS, the Authority and the Redeveloper have entered into that certain Second Amendment to Contract for Private Redevelopment dated as of March 20, 2006 (the “Second Amendment”) (collectively, as amended, the “Contract”); and WHEREAS, the Redeveloper has determined that due to the ongoing economic downturn the asset and income requirements of the Project significantly impact the ability to initially market and sell new units, and resell units under the original and revised asset and income requirements of the Project; and WHEREAS, the Authority and Redeveloper have determined to modify the Contract and as described herein. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual obligations of the parties hereto, each of them does hereby covenant and agree with the other as follows: Section 1. Section 4.5 Affordability Covenants., shall be amended to read as follows: Section 4.5. Affordability Covenants. (a) The parties acknowledge that the TIF District is a housing district under Section 469.174, subd. 11 of the TIF Act, and that the Minimum Improvements are subject to the income restrictions for owner occupied housing under Section 469.1761, subd. 2 of the TIF Act (as supplemented by additional restrictions described in this Section). Redeveloper agrees that, at all times through the Termination Date, it will ensure that initial and all subsequent conveyances of unit interests in the Cooperative will be made to buyers in accordance with the following terms: (i) At least 40 % (or 42) of the unit interests will be sold to persons with a household income not exceeding 80% of the median income for the Minneapolis-St. Paul metropolitan area, adjusted for family size. (ii) At least 55% (or 58) of the unit interests will be sold to persons with (1) in the case of one and two-person households, household income not exceeding 100% of the metropolitan area income median income, (2) in the case of three or more person households, household income not exceeding 115% of the metropolitan area median income. EDA Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 7b) Page 8 Subject: Third Amendment to Redevelopment Contract with Aquila Senior LLC (iii) For all units subject to either clause (i) or clause (ii) above, the buyer’s total assets (determined in accordance with the Public Housing Leasing and Occupancy Plan adopted by the St. Louis Park Housing Authority) as of the date of sale may not exceed $500,000 on a net present value basis (the “Maximum Assets”), determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principals. The Maximum Assets will be adjusted on January 1, 2010 and January 1 of every fifth year thereafter through the Termination Date, based on the cumulative increase in the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Price Index—All Urban Consumers for the preceding five-year period. This asset limit may be increased by up to an additional $250,000 based upon the most recent assessed value of a buyer’s principal residence as expressed on the city’s tax rolls or the sale price of a buyer’s principal residence. The sale price of a principal residence shall be evidenced by or closing documents substantiating the sale of the principal residence and the net proceeds thereof. This $250,000 limit may be adjusted upwards annually by three percent (3%) commencing on January 1, 2006. (iii) (iv) For the purposes of this Section, household income must be determined in accordance with Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (“MHFA”) procedures for owner-occupied assistance programs. After the initial sale of a unit, the household income limitations of clause (a) (i) or (ii) above, shall not apply to any subsequent resale of that unit. (b) The Redeveloper shall deliver or cause to be delivered written evidence satisfactory to the Authority of the status of compliance with the covenants in this Section: (i) upon initial sale of 50% of the units in the Minimum Improvements; (ii) upon completion of the initial sale of all units; and (iii) thereafter on each January 15 through the Termination Date. Such evidence must be consistent with MHFA procedures for owner-occupied housing assistance programs. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, a buyer is not required to qualify for MHFA assistance, so long as the buyer otherwise meets the income limits described in this Section. In determining compliance with this Section, the Authority will use the MHFA median incomes for the year in which the closing on the sale of that unit interest in the Cooperative occurs. (c) Notwithstanding the foregoing, if a unit interest is purchased by a third party for a person or persons who meet the income requirements of this Section 4.5 (a) (i) or (ii) above, and who occupy such unit as their principal residence, such unit shall qualify as meeting the income requirements of this Section 4.5 for initial purchases of the unit. Section 2. Effective Date. This resolution shall be effective upon full execution of this Third Amendment to the Contract. Section 3. The Contract as amended, remains in full force and effect and is not modified except as expressly provided above. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Authority and Redeveloper have caused this Third Amendment to be duly executed by their duly authorized representatives as of the date first above written. EDA Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 7b) Page 9 Subject: Third Amendment to Redevelopment Contract with Aquila Senior LLC ST. LOUIS PARK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY By Its President By Its Executive Director STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of November, 2011 by Phillip Finkelstein and Thomas Harmening, the President and Executive Director of the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority, on behalf of the Authority. Notary Public [The Remainder Of This Page Has Been Left Blank Intentionally.] EDA Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 7b) Page 10 Subject: Third Amendment to Redevelopment Contract with Aquila Senior LLC AQUILA SENIOR, LLC By _______________________________________ Its STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF __________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of November, 2011, by _________________________, the _________________ of Aquila Senior, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. Notary Public [The Remainder Of This Page Has Been Left Blank Intentionally.] Meeting Date: November 21, 2011 Agenda Item #: 3a UNOFFICIAL MINUTES CITY COUNCIL MEETING ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA NOVEMBER 7, 2011 1. Call to Order Mayor Jacobs called the meeting to order at 7:37 p.m. Councilmembers present: Mayor Jeff Jacobs, Phil Finkelstein, Anne Mavity, Julia Ross, and Sue Santa. Councilmembers absent: Paul Omodt and Susan Sanger. Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), Deputy City Manager/Director of Human Resources (Ms. Deno), and Recording Secretary (Ms. Hughes). 1a. Pledge of Allegiance 1b. Roll Call 2. Presentations - None 3. Approval of Minutes 3a. City Council Meeting Minutes of October 3, 2011 The minutes were approved as presented. 3b. Study Session Meeting Minutes of October 10, 2011 The minutes were approved as presented. 3c. City Council Meeting Minutes of October 17, 2011 The minutes were approved as presented. 3d. Study Session Meeting Minutes of October 24, 2011 The minutes were approved as presented. 4. Approval of Agenda and Items on Consent Calendar NOTE: The Consent Calendar lists those items of business which are considered to be routine and/or which need no discussion. Consent items are acted upon by one motion. If discussion is desired by either a Councilmember or a member of the audience, that item may be moved to an appropriate section of the regular agenda for discussion. 4a. Adopt Resolution No. 11-108 accepting work and authorizing final payment in the amount of $14,261.76 for the Dehumidification System project at Rec Center, Contract No. 45-11. City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 3a) Page 2 Subject: City Council Meeting Minutes of November 7, 2011 4b. Adopt Resolution No. 11-109 amending and restating Resolution No. 11-30 regarding the On-Sale Intoxicating and Sunday Liquor License for Toby Keith I Love This Bar probationary status extension for the license term through March 1, 2012. 4c. Adopt Resolution No. 11-110 reauthorizing a variance for West End Apartments. 4d. Approve Resolution No. 11-111 accepting a donation from the Minnesota Cycling Team in the amount of $1,000 to be available for individuals who qualify for financial assistance through the Parks and Recreation Department. 4e. Adopt a Resolution No. 11-112 in support of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District’s creek restoration project along Minnehaha Creek between Louisiana Avenue S. and Meadowbrook Road. 4f. Adopt Resolution No. 11-113 authorizing the special assessment for the repair of the water service line at 4000 Randall Avenue, St. Louis Park, MN - P.I.D. 06- 028-24-14-0014. 4g. Adopt Resolution No. 11-114 authorizing the special assessment for the repair of the sewer service line at 3941 Dakota Avenue South, St. Louis Park, MN - P.I.D. 21-117-21-23-0042. 4h. Adopt Resolution No. 11-115 authorizing the special assessment for the repair of the sewer service line at 4073 Utica Avenue South, St. Louis Park, MN - PID 07- 028-24-23-0078. 4i. Approve Amendment No. 2 to City Agreement No. 1897, between the City and New Cingular Wireless (Cingular, f.k.a. AT&T) for communication antennas on the city water tower at 2541 Nevada Avenue. 4j. Grant a drainage easement for 7301/7317 Lake Street West. 4k. Adopt Resolution No. 11-116 authorizing parking restrictions along the North Frontage Road of County Road 25 from Ottawa Avenue to Raleigh Avenue. 4l. Approve for filing Board of Zoning Appeals Minutes August 25, 2011. 4m. Approve for filing Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission Minutes September 14, 2011. 4n. Approve for filing Human Rights Commission Minutes September 20, 2011. 4o. Approve for filing Planning Commission Minutes October 5, 2011. It was moved by Councilmember Ross, seconded by Councilmember Santa, to approve the Agenda and items listed on the Consent Calendar; and to waive reading of all resolutions and ordinances. The motion passed 5-0 (Councilmembers Omodt and Sanger absent). 5. Boards and Commissions - None 6. Public Hearings - None 7. Requests, Petitions, and Communications from the Public – None 8. Resolutions, Ordinances, Motions and Discussion Items 8a. 2012 Employer Benefits Contribution Resolution No. 11-117 Ms. Deno presented the staff report and advised that the City was not expecting to change carriers in 2012 or to get a 0% aggregate renewal, but through the efforts of Ms. Fosse City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 3a) Page 3 Subject: City Council Meeting Minutes of November 7, 2011 and the City’s consultant, the City was able to secure a bid from HealthPartners for a 0% aggregate renewal with a substantially similar plan to the City’s previous carrier, Blue Cross Blue Shield. She stated that preliminary budget discussions included a proposed $35 per employee per month recommended increase; however, the HealthPartners quote will allow the City to hold the line on its employer contribution of $815 per month for full time benefit earning employees. She noted that the City’s Benefits Committee has representatives from all the bargaining units and non-union employee groups and has recommended to the City Manager to move to HealthPartners. She indicated that the City was also able to secure a rate cap on its health insurance of no larger than 9% for 2013. She advised that the City is moving ahead with its Wellness Initiative at $25 per employee per month as approved by Council earlier in the year. Dental and life insurance rates will remain the same in 2012, long term disability rates will reflect a slight reduction, and long term care, which is a voluntary benefit paid in full by those employees who participate in the program, will see a slight adjustment in rates for 2012. She added that the City will continue to offer four deferred compensation programs. Mayor Jacobs expressed the City Council’s thanks to Ms. Deno and the entire Human Resources staff for their efforts. Councilmember Ross requested information regarding short term disability and whether this is offered to the City’s employees. Ms. Deno indicated the City’s personnel manual covers short term disability and explained that when the City moved from flex leave, it incorporated the City’s short term disability program for employees in the flex leave program. It was moved by Councilmember Mavity, seconded by Councilmember Santa, to adopt Resolution No. 11-117 establishing 2012 Employer Benefits Contribution. The motion passed 5-0 (Councilmembers Omodt and Sanger absent). 9. Communications Mayor Jacobs encouraged residents to vote tomorrow. He stated that residents can contact the League of Women Voters or the City Clerk for their polling place and can register at the polls. 10. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 7:44 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Nancy Stroth, City Clerk Jeff Jacobs, Mayor Meeting Date: November 21, 2011 Agenda Item #: 3b UNOFFICIAL MINUTES SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA NOVEMBER 14, 2011 1. Call to Order Mayor Jacobs called the meeting to order at 6:22 p.m. Councilmembers present: Mayor Jeff Jacobs, Julia Ross, Susan Sanger, and Sue Santa. Councilmembers absent: Phil Finkelstein, Anne Mavity, and Paul Omodt. Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), City Clerk (Ms. Stroth), and Recording Secretary (Ms. Hughes). 1a. Roll Call 2. Resolutions, Ordinances, Motions and Discussion Items 2a. Canvass Results of the Municipal General Election held November 8, 2011 Resolution No. 11-118 Ms. Stroth presented the staff report and official results of the Municipal General Election held on November 8, 2011. She advised that 3,795 total votes were cast, representing a turnout of 13%. She stated that the candidates certified by the election judges are Mayor Jeff Jacobs, Councilmember At Large A Steve Hallfin, and Councilmember At Large B Jake Spano. It was moved by Councilmember Santa, seconded by Councilmember Ross, to adopt Resolution No. 11-118 Canvassing Election Returns of St. Louis Park – November 8, 2011 Municipal General Election. The motion passed 4-0 (Councilmembers Finkelstein, Mavity, and Omodt absent). 3. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 6:24 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Nancy Stroth, City Clerk Jeff Jacobs, Mayor Meeting Date: November 21, 2011 Agenda Item #: 4a Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance Presentation Other: EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other: Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other: TITLE: Resolution Supporting Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Initiative to Address Aquatic Invasive Species. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to adopt a resolution supporting the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) in creating and implementing a management plan to educate, control and prevent the spread of aquatic invasive species through the watershed area. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council support the MCWD taking the lead role in creating and enforcing a management plan for Aquatic Invasive Species (AIS)? BACKGROUND: The City of St. Louis Park received a letter from the MCWD asking for a resolution of support for them to be the lead agency in an AIS management plan. The MCWD recognizes that AIS is a growing concern across the state. There is a local urgency to find solutions. The MCWD believes that they are in a position to help address this locally. They believe that starting now to gain support from area cities allows them to be proactive in developing solutions. The philosophy behind it is that a single entity covering a regional area is best suited to pursue potential solutions to this problem. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The city has not been asked for financial assistance at this time. The MCWD has taxing authority and may, in the future, decide to increase staff as a result of the management program created. VISION CONSIDERATION: Supporting this resolution would be consistent with our second strategic direction: “St. Louis Park is committed to being a leader in environmental stewardship. This will increase environmental consciousness and responsibility.” Attachments: Resolution Prepared by: Cindy Walsh, Director of Parks and Recreation Jim Vaughan, Environmental Coordinator Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 4a) Page 2 Subject: Resolution Supporting MCWD Initiative to Address Aquatic Invasive Species RESOLUTION NO. 11-___ RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT’S (“MCWD”) INITIATIVE CREATING, IMPLEMENTING AND MANAGING A REGIONAL PLAN TO CONTROL, EDUCATE AND PREVENT THE SPREAD OF AQUATIC INVASIVE SPECIES (“AIS”) ACROSS THE WATERSHED AREA WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park is a partner with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and is supportive of the Watershed District’s goals for the creek within the City; and WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park realizes that AIS are a significant threat to our regions, lakes, rivers and Minnehaha Creek; and WHEREAS, the City firmly believes a single entity covering a more regional area is best suited to pursue potential solutions to this problem; and WHEREAS, left unmanaged AIS will negatively impact local businesses, communities, and the ability to enjoy recreation boating, fishing, swimming and other valuable natural resources; and WHEREAS, immediate action will help prevent the spread of AIS into local water bodies. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park hereby supports the MCWD as the lead agency to prevent the spread of AIS and to use their scientific expertise with staff and financial resources to create a district wide AIS management program. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council November 21, 2011 City Manager Mayor Attest: City Clerk Meeting Date: November 21, 2011 Agenda Item #: 4b Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance Presentation Other: EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other: Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other: TITLE: Traffic Study Number 628: Authorize Installation of Parking Restrictions on Gamble Drive East of Park Place Boulevard. RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution authorizing parking restrictions on Gamble Drive east of Park Place Boulevard. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish to authorize the installation of the parking restrictions as noted in this staff report? The proposed action is consistent with City policy. BACKGROUND: The City’s Police Department has reported problems with cars parking on Gamble Drive, just east of West End Boulevard (see attached map). This is a traffic lane, and the area was not intended to allow parking when The West End was developed. However, there is no resolution on file that prohibits it. City staff finds this request reasonable, and is therefore recommending Council approve the attached resolution authorizing the installation of “No Parking” restrictions on the north side of Gamble Drive, from West End Boulevard to Duke Drive. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The cost of enacting these controls is minimal and will come out of the general operating budget. VISION CONSIDERATION: None. Attachments: Resolution Map Prepared by: Laura Adler, Engineering Program Coordinator Reviewed by: Scott A. Brink, City Engineer Michael Rardin, Director of Public Works Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 4b) Page 2 Subject: TS # 628: Authorize Installation of Parking Restrictions Gamble Dr at Park Place Blvd RESOLUTION NO. 11-____ RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING INSTALLATION OF “NO PARKING” RESTRICTIONS ON THE NORTH SIDE OF GAMBLE DRIVE FROM WEST END BOULEVARD TO DUKE DRIVE TRAFFIC STUDY NO. 628 WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota has been requested, has studied, and has determined that the following traffic controls meet the requirements of the City’s policy for installation of parking restrictions. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, that the Director of Public Works is hereby authorized to install the following controls: 1. “No Parking” on the north side of Gamble Drive from West End Boulevard to Duke Drive. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council November 21, 2011 City Manager Mayor Attest: City Clerk City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 4b) Subject: TS # 628: Authorize Installation of Parking Restrictions Gamble Dr at Park Place Blvd Page 3 Meeting Date: November 21, 2011 City Council Agenda Item #: 4c Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance Presentation Other: EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other: Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other: TITLE: Traffic Study Number 629: Authorize Installation of Parking Restrictions on the 5600 Block of Lake Street. RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution authorizing parking restrictions on the 5600 block of Lake Street. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish to authorize the installation of the parking restrictions as noted in this staff report? The proposed action is consistent with City policy. BACKGROUND: The City received a request from a business owner at 5601 Lake Street to restrict parking in front of his business. Currently, there are no parking restrictions in this area and the business owner said that employees and bus riders are parking all day long in the space and there was no parking available for customers. The request was to limit parking in the area to 2 hour parking, 7 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Friday. City staff sent out two letters to businesses and residents along this section of Lake Street, requesting feedback on the proposal. There were no negative responses to the proposed restrictions, and one resident suggested extending the 2 hour parking restrictions to the rest of the block. Other residents have agreed. City staff finds this request reasonable, and is therefore recommending Council approve the attached resolution authorizing the installation of two hour parking restrictions on the 5600 block of Lake Street. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The cost of enacting these controls is minimal and will come out of the general operating budget. VISION CONSIDERATION: None. Attachments: Resolution Map Prepared by: Laura Adler, Engineering Program Coordinator Reviewed by: Scott A. Brink, City Engineer Michael Rardin, Director of Public Works Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 4c) Page 2 Subject: TS # 629: Authorize Installation of Parking Restrictions 5600 Block of Lake Street RESOLUTION NO. 11-____ RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING INSTALLATION OF “TWO HOUR PARKING 7 A.M. TO 5 P.M. MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY” RESTRICTIONS ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE 5600 BLOCK OF LAKE STREET TRAFFIC STUDY NO. 629 WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota has been requested, has studied, and has determined that the following traffic controls meet the requirements of the City’s policy for installation of parking restrictions. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, that the Director of Public Works is hereby authorized to install the following controls: 1. “Two Hour Parking 7 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Friday” on the south side of the 5600 block of Lake Street. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council November 21, 2011 City Manager Mayor Attest: City Clerk City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 4c) Page 3 Subject: TS # 629: Authorize Installation of Parking Restrictions 5600 Block of Lake Street TS 629: Proposed Parking Restrictions on the 5600 Block of Lake Street Proposed “2 Hour Parking, Monday through Friday, 7 a.m. to 5 p.m.” Meeting Date: November 21, 2011 City Council Agenda Item #: 4d Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance Presentation Other: EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other: Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other: TITLE: Traffic Study Number 630: Authorize the Removal of Permit Parking Areas. RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution authorizing the elimination of permit parking restrictions in front of 3300 Huntington Avenue and 2716 Dakota Avenue. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish to remove the permit parking restrictions located in front of the subject properties? The proposed action is consistent with City policy. BACKGROUND: The City has a program for authorizing permit parking for residents who have a medical need for parking adjacent to their homes. Each year, staff contacts residents who currently have permit parking to ensure that it is still required. Several residents have notified the City that their permit parking is no longer necessary and may be removed. Staff has already removed the permit parking signs. The final step is to rescind the original resolutions authorizing the permit parking. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The cost of removing these controls is minimal and will come out of the general operating budget. VISION CONSIDERATION: None. Attachments: Resolution Prepared by: Laura Adler, Engineering Program Coordinator Reviewed by: Scott A. Brink, City Engineer Michael P. Rardin, Director of Public Works Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 4d) Page 2 Subject: TS # 630: Authorize the Removal of Permit Parking Areas RESOLUTION NO. 11-_____ RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ELIMINATION OF PERMIT PARKING RESTRICTIONS IN FRONT OF 3300 HUNTINGTON AVENUE AND 2716 DAKOTA AVENUE AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION NOS. 95-122 AND 04-109 WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota has been requested, has studied, and has determined that traffic controls are no longer necessary at these locations. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, that the Director of Public Works in hereby authorized to remove the following traffic controls and rescind the following resolutions: 1. Rescind Resolution No. 95-122 for the existing permit parking restriction at 3300 Huntington Avenue. 2. Rescind Resolution No. 04-109 for the existing permit parking restriction at 2716 Dakota Avenue. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council November 21, 2011 City Manager Mayor Attest: City Clerk Meeting Date: November 21, 2011 Agenda Item #: 4e Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance Presentation Other: EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other: Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other: TITLE: Project Report: Water Project - WTP #6 Rehabilitation - Project 2010-1300. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution accepting the project report, establishing Improvement Project No. 2010-1300 approving plans and specifications, and authorizing advertisement for bids for Improvement Project No. 2010-1300. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish to continue implementing planned improvements to the City’s water utility system? BACKGROUND: History The current 5-year CIP includes Project 2010-13000 which is the rehabilitation of Water Treatment Plant No. 6 (WTP #6) located at 4241 Zarthan Avenue in the Brookside Neighborhood. WTP #6 for the City of St. Louis Park consists of three buildings including the water treatment plant, a high service pump building, and Wellhouse 12. Well 12 pumps water to the water treatment plant which consists of two 10’ x 63’ horizontal pressure filters installed in 1963. Radium, iron and manganese are removed from the water and the water is treated with fluoride and chlorine. The treated water is stored in a 1.5 million gallon reservoir on site and then sent to the distribution system by the high service pumps. Due to the age and condition of WTP #6, rehabilitation and upgrades are necessary. Proposed Work This project will be conducted in a similar manner as the rehabilitations completed at WTP’s 1, 8, 10, and 16. The project will include the replacement of the sand filtration media inside the filters along with several improvements and upgrades to the water treatment plant, high service pump building, and Wellhouse 12. The project generally consists of the following:  Spot repair of filter vessel coatings for both the interior and exterior surfaces  Install pressure sand filter media  Replace motor control center (pump controls)  Install variable frequency drive for well pump  Replace HVAC systems for well houses  Building interior restoration including painting and floor resurfacing  Chemical room storage upgrades  Replace piping valves and install new flow meters  Replace air compressor in the water treatment plant  Replace the electrical system in the chemical rooms and remove electric components no longer needed City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 4e) Subject: Project Report: Water Project - WTP #6 Rehabilitation - Project 2010-1300 Page 2 Project Timeline: Should the City Council approve the Project Report, it is anticipated that the following schedule could be met:  Approval of Plans/Authorization to Bid by City Council November 21, 2011  Advertise for bids Sun-Sailor November 24, 2011  Advertise for bids Construction Bulletin November 28, 2011  Mandatory Pre-Bid Meeting with Bidders Early December, 2011  Bid Opening December 21, 2011  Bid Tab Report to City Council; Award contract January 2, 2012  Construction January – April 2012 FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATIONS: This project is included in the city’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) scheduled for construction in 2012. The total estimated costs of the improvements are: Estimated Costs Construction Cost $782,700 Contingencies (5%) $ 39,300 Consulting Design, Engineering & Inspection $ 75,000 Administrative Cost (3%) $ 25,000 Total $922,000 Funding Sources Water Utility Fund Amount $922,000 VISION CONSIDERATION: Not Applicable. Attachment: Resolution Prepared By: Jim Olson, Engineering Project Manager Scott Anderson, Superintendent of Utilities Reviewed By: Michael P. Rardin, Director of Public Works Approved By: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 4e) Subject: Project Report: Water Project - WTP #6 Rehabilitation - Project 2010-1300 Page 3 RESOLUTION NO. 11-____ RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE PROJECT REPORT, ESTABLISHING IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 2010-1300 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 2010-1300 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park has received a report from the Engineering Project Manager related to the Rehabilitation of Water Treatment Plant No. 6. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, that: 1. The Project Report regarding Project No. 2010-1300 is hereby accepted. 2. Such improvements as proposed are necessary, cost effective, and feasible as detailed in the Project Report. 3. The proposed project, designated as Project No. 2010-1300, is hereby established and ordered. 4. The plans and specifications for the making of these improvements, as prepared under the direction of the City Engineer, or designee, are approved. 5. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted at least two weeks in the official newspaper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids for the making of said improvements under said-approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall appear not less than ten (10) days prior to the date and time bids will be received by the City Clerk, and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the City Clerk and accompanied by a bid bond payable to the City for five (5) percent of the amount of the bid. 6. The City Engineer, or designee, shall report the receipt of bids to the City Council shortly after the letting date. The report shall include a tabulation of the bid results and a recommendation to the City Council. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council November 21, 2011 City Manager Mayor Attest: City Clerk Meeting Date: November 21, 2011 Agenda Item #: 4f Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance Presentation Other: EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other: Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other: TITLE: First Amendment to the Redevelopment Contract with Duke Realty Limited Partnership. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution approving the First Amendment to the Contract for Private Redevelopment By and Between the City of St. Louis Park, St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority and Duke Realty. The City Council is being asked to approve the proposed First Amendment as the City is a party to the above Contract. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council support correcting the legal description within the Redevelopment Contract as specified in the proposed First Amendment? BACKGROUND: On December 17, 2007 the EDA and City approved a Redevelopment Contract with Duke Realty related to The West End project near I-394 and Highway 100. This contract was substantially modified to add the West End Apartments and change the schedule for building via an Amended and Restated Redevelopment Contract approved on May 17, 2010. The project essentially consists of three components – a lifestyle retail complex, an apartment building and a series of Class A office buildings. The 350,000 SF lifestyle center is complete and 80% of the retail space is leased. The upscale, 120–unit apartment building is expected to break ground late next spring. Given the current office market, construction on the first of what is expected to be three or four Class A office buildings (with 1.1 million SF between them) is not likely to occur until the required commencement date which is March 1, 2014. On October 27th, Duke Realty officially notified the City that it was selling the 1600 Tower and MoneyGram office buildings to the Blackstone Group. These are the existing office buildings across the street from The West End. Duke will continue to own The West End and remains committed to building the 1.1 million square feet of future office buildings called for in the Redevelopment Contract with the EDA and City. The 1600 Tower and MoneyGram building are not part of The West End project even though they have been carefully integrated into the redevelopment. The EDA is not required to review or approve of the transfer of the properties to the Blackstone Group. However, when the Redevelopment Contract was amended and restated in May 2010, the legal description that was used inadvertently included the 1600 Tower and MoneyGram office building site. This was an error. The parcel on which these office buildings sit was not part of the original legal description for the Redevelopment Contract with Duke in 2007. The proper method for correcting this inadvertent error is through an amendment to the Redevelopment Contract. City Council Meeting of November 21, 2012 (Item No. 4f) Page 2 Subject: First Amendment to Redevelopment Contract w/ Duke Realty Limited Partnership Proposed First Amendment The proposed First Amendment corrects the legal description related to The West End project contained within the Redevelopment Contract with Duke Realty. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: There is no financial impact to the EDA or City for correcting the legal description within the Redevelopment Contract with Duke Realty. This action is necessary for completion of the ownership transfer of the 1600 Tower and MoneyGram office buildings to the Blackstone Group. VISION CONSIDERATION: The West End project is consistent with the City’s Vision; especially the Strategic Directions concerning gathering places, public art, trails, sidewalks and transportation. Attachments: Resolution Approving First Amendment First Amendment to Redevelopment Contract with Duke Realty Prepared by: Greg Hunt, Economic Development Coordinator Reviewed by: Kevin Locke, Community Development Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, EDA Executive Director and City Manager City Council Meeting of November 21, 2012 (Item No. 4f) Page 3 Subject: First Amendment to Redevelopment Contract w/ Duke Realty Limited Partnership CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK RESOLUTION NO. 11-____ RESOLUTION APPROVING A FIRST AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE REDEVELOPMENT AMONG THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK, THE ST. LOUIS PARK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND DUKE REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council (the “Council”) of the City of St. Louis Park ("City") as follows: Section 1. Recitals. 1.01. The St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority (the “Authority”) is currently administering its Redevelopment Project No. 1 ("Project") pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047 ("HRA Act"), and within the Project has established The West End Tax Increment Financing District (“TIF District”). 1.02. The Authority and the City entered into an Amended and Restated Contract for Private Redevelopment Dated as of May 17, 2010 (the “Contract”), regarding redevelopment of a portion of the property within the TIF District. 1.03. The parties have determined to a need to revise the Contract in certain respects, and to that end have prepared a First Amendment to Amended and Restated Contract for Private Redevelopment (the “First Amendment”). 1.04. The Council has reviewed the First Amendment and finds that the approval and execution thereof and performance of the City’s obligations thereunder are in the best interest of the City and its residents. Section 2. City Approval; Other Proceedings. 2.01. The First Amendment as presented to the Council is hereby in all respects approved, subject to modifications that do not alter the substance of the transaction and that are approved by the Mayor and City Manager provided that execution of the documents by such officials shall be conclusive evidence of approval. 2.02. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute on behalf of the City the First Amendment, and any documents referenced therein requiring execution by the City, and to carry out, on behalf of the City its obligations thereunder. 2.03. City staff and consultants are authorized to take any actions necessary to carry out the intent of this resolution. City Council Meeting of November 21, 2012 (Item No. 4f) Page 4 Subject: First Amendment to Redevelopment Contract w/ Duke Realty Limited Partnership Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council November 21, 2011 City Manager Mayor Attest Secretary City Council Meeting of November 21, 2012 (Item No. 4f) Page 5 Subject: First Amendment to Redevelopment Contract w/ Duke Realty Limited Partnership FIRST AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE REDEVELOPMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made as of the 21st day of November, 2011, by and between the CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK, a Minnesota municipal corporation, (the “City”), and the ST. LOUIS PARK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, a public body corporate and politic (the “Authority”), established pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.090 to 469.1081 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”), and DUKE REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, an Indiana limited partnership (the “Redeveloper”). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Authority was created pursuant to the Act and was authorized to transact business and exercise its powers by a resolution of the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park (the “City”); and WHEREAS, the Authority has undertaken a program to promote redevelopment of land that is characterized by blight and blighting factors within the City, and in this connection the Authority has created Redevelopment Project No. 1 (hereinafter referred to as the “Project”) in the City, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047 (the “HRA Act”); and WHEREAS, the Authority has established a redevelopment tax increment financing district known as The West End Tax Increment Financing District (the “TIF District”) within the Project and adopted a financing plan (the “TIF Plan”) for the TIF District in order to facilitate redevelopment of certain property in the Project, all pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 to 469.179; and WHEREAS, the Authority, City and Redeveloper entered into an Amended and Restated Contract for Private Redevelopment dated May 17, 2010 (the “Contract”), which described the parties’ respective responsibilities regarding redevelopment of certain property in the TIF District (referred to as the “Redevelopment Property”); and WHEREAS, the parties have determined a need to modify the Contract solely to correct the legal description of the Redevelopment Property and the Adjacent Property; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual obligations of the parties hereto, each of them does hereby covenant and agree with the other as follows: 1. Schedule A to the Contract is revised to read as attached hereto. 2. The Contract remains in full force and effect, and is not modified except as expressly provided herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Authority and the City have caused this Agreement to be duly executed in its respective name and behalf and its seal to be hereunto duly affixed and the Redeveloper has caused this Agreement to be duly executed in its name and behalf as of the date first above written. City Council Meeting of November 21, 2012 (Item No. 4f) Page 6 Subject: First Amendment to Redevelopment Contract w/ Duke Realty Limited Partnership ST. LOUIS PARK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY By Its President By Executive Director STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of November, 2011 by Phillip Finkelstein and Thomas Harmening, the President and Executive Director, respectively, of the Economic Development Authority of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, on behalf of the Authority. Notary Public City Council Meeting of November 21, 2012 (Item No. 4f) Page 7 Subject: First Amendment to Redevelopment Contract w/ Duke Realty Limited Partnership CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK By Its Mayor By City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of November, 2011 by Jeff Jacobs and Thomas Harmening, the Mayor and City Manager, respectively, of the of the City of St. Louis Park, on behalf of the City. Notary Public City Council Meeting of November 21, 2012 (Item No. 4f) Page 8 Subject: First Amendment to Redevelopment Contract w/ Duke Realty Limited Partnership DUKE REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP By ____________________________________, the Senior Vice President of Duke Realty Corporation, an Indiana corporation and the general partner of the above-named limited partnership STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of ___________, 2011 by Pat Mascia, the Senior Vice president of Duke Realty Corporation, an Indiana corporation and the general partner of Duke Realty Limited Partnership, an Indiana limited partnership, on behalf of the partnership. Notary Public City Council Meeting of November 21, 2012 (Item No. 4f) Page 9 Subject: First Amendment to Redevelopment Contract w/ Duke Realty Limited Partnership SCHEDULE A REDEVELOPMENT PROPERTY Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4, Block 1; Lot 2, Block 2; and Outlot A, The Shops at West End, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. GOLDEN VALLEY PROPERTY Parcel 5: Tract 1: Lot 1, Block 4, "Kavlis Cedardale" and that part of the vacated alley in said Block 4, lying East of the center line thereof and between the extensions across it of the North and South lines of said Lot 1, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Tract 2: That part of the North 693.61 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 30, Township 29, Range 24 lying Westerly and Southerly of State Trunk Highway No. 100, also known as the Belt Line Highway, Hennepin County, Minnesota. EXCEPT that portion taken by the State of Minnesota pursuant to Partial Final Certificate recorded July 21, 1993 as Document No. 2401510. (Torrens Property-Certificate of Title No. 1012734) Parcel 6: That part of vacated Raleigh Avenue and of vacated Douglas Avenue all according to the plat of "Kavlis Cedardale" lying Westerly of the Westerly right of way line of State Trunk Highway No. 100 as described in the Final Certificate recorded in Book 412 of Miscellaneous Records, page 148 in the office of the County Recorder and lying Southerly of a line drawn from the Southwest corner of Tract E, Registered Land Survey No. 864 and passing through a point on the East line of said Tract E distant 18.18 feet North of the Southeast corner of said Tract E, Hennepin County, Minnesota. EXCEPT that portion taken by the State of Minnesota pursuant to Partial Final Certificate recorded July 21, 1993 as Document No. 2401510. (Torrens Property-Certificate of Title No. 1012686) Parcel 7: Lots 2, 3, 4 and 6, Block 4 except that portion of said Lots taken for Belt Line Highway; Lots 7 to 12 inclusive, Block 4 and that part of Raleigh Avenue vacated lying between the Westerly extension of the South line of said Lot 7 and the North line of said Lot 12 and that part of the vacated alley in said Block 4 lying between the Easterly extensions of the North and South lines of said Lot 7 and between the South line of said Lot 9 and the North line of said Lot 11 and that part of the West 1/2 of the vacated alley in said Block 4 lying between the extensions of the City Council Meeting of November 21, 2012 (Item No. 4f) Page 10 Subject: First Amendment to Redevelopment Contract w/ Duke Realty Limited Partnership North and South lines of said Lot 8 and between the North and South lines of said Lot 12; ALL in "Kavlis Cedardale", according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. That part of the following described property: That part of vacated Raleigh and Douglas Avenues as shown on the plat of "Kavlis Cedardale" lying between the extensions across said Avenues of the South and West lines of Lot 7, Block 4 and that part of said vacated Douglas Avenue adjoining Lots 6 and 7, Block 4 of said plat lying between the Westerly line of Belt Line Highway and the extension across said Avenue of the West line of said Lot 7, Block 4, "Kavlis Cedardale"; Which lies Northerly of a straight line extending between the Southwest corner of Tract E, Registered Land Survey No. 864, Hennepin County, Minnesota and the Westerly right-of-way of State Trunk Highway 100 passing through a point on the East line of said Tract E distant 18.18 feet North of the Southeast corner of said Tract E as measured along said East line, Hennepin County, Minnesota. EXCEPT that portion taken by the State of Minnesota pursuant to Partial Final Certificate recorded July 21, 1993 as Document No. 2401510. (Torrens Property-Certificate of Title No. 1012678) Parcel 8: That part of the South 60 feet of the North 753.61 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 30, Township 29, Range 24, lying West of the Belt Line Highway, Hennepin County, Minnesota. EXCEPT that portion taken by the State of Minnesota pursuant to Partial Final Certificate recorded July 21, 1993 as Document No. 2401510. (Torrens Property-Certificate of Title No. 1012680) ADJACENT PROPERTY Lot 1, Block 2, The Shops at West End, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Meeting Date: November 21, 2011 Agenda Item #: 4g MINUTES St. Louis Park Housing Authority City Hall – Westwood Room Wednesday, September 14, 2011 5:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioners Catherine Courtney, Renee DuFour, Trinicia Hill Commissioner Metzger arrived at 5:03 p.m. Commissioner Kaufman arrived at 5:08 p.m. GUESTS PRESENT: Cheryl Davidson, Wayside House, Inc. STAFF PRESENT: Jane Klesk, Kathy Larsen, Kevin Locke, Michele Schnitker, Teresa Schlegel 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 5:01 p.m. 2. Approval of Minutes for July, 2011 The Board minutes of July 13, 2011 were unanimously approved. 3. Hearings – None 4. Reports and Committees – None 5. Unfinished Business – None 6. New Business Commissioner Courtney requested that Election of Officers be tabled until all Commissioners were present at the meeting. a. Approval of Contract Extension – Wayside Project Based Housing Choice Vouchers Ms. Schnitker introduced Cheryl Davidson of Wayside House, Inc., who was available to answer questions from the Commissioners. Ms. Schnitker stated that the contract with Wayside for 15 units of project-based assistance will be extended for an additional year, while both parties continue to seek replacement housing subsidy to reduce Wayside’s reliance on project-based assistance at their supportive housing development. Commissioner Kaufman moved to approve the Amendment to the Housing Assistance Payments Contract between the Housing Authority of St. Louis Park and Wayside House, Inc. Commissioner Metzger seconded the motion, and the motion passed 5-0. City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 4g) Page 2 Subject: Housing Authority Meeting Minutes of September 14, 2011 b. Election of Officers Ms. Schnitker presented the current slate of officers: Catherine Courtney, Chair, Justin Kaufman, Vice Chair, and Renee DuFour, Secretary. After discussion, Commissioner DuFour moved to approve the current slate of officers, and Commissioner Metzger seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0. c. Amendments to Contracts between the Center for Energy and Environment (CEE) and the St. Louis Park Housing Authority Ms. Larsen recommended that the Board execute amendments to the Center for Energy and Environment loan program contracts to include removal of the Liability and Indemnification clauses in consideration for extending the terms of the contracts to January 11, 2012. Commissioner DuFour moved to approve the Seventh Amendment to the Loan Origination Agreement between Center for Energy and Environment and Housing Authority in and for the City of St, Louis Park (Discount Loan Program), the Third Amendment to the Loan Origination Agreement between Center for Energy and Environment and Housing Authority in and for the City of St. Louis Park (Move Up in the Park Program), and the Third Amendment to the Loan Origination Agreement between Center for Energy and Environment and Housing Authority in and for the City of St. Louis Park (Live Where You Work Program). Commissioner Kaufman seconded the motion, and the motion passed 5-0. d. Approval to Amend the Public Housing Admissions and Continued Occupancy, Resolution No. 607: MHOP Residency Preference Ms. Schnitker explained that in order to comply with the requirements of the Consent Decree and the agreement between the HA and Minneapolis Public Housing Authority, the HA must establish a residency preference for applicants living in Minneapolis who apply for the MHOP units at Louisiana Court. Commissioner DuFour moved to approve Resolution No. 607, Amendment to Chapter 4-Part III.B. Selection Method, of the Public Housing Admissions and Continued Occupancy Policy, and Commissioner Metzger seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0 e. Approval of Acceptance of 2011 Capital Fund Program Allocation, Resolution No. 608 Ms. Schlegel stated that the HA proposes to use 2011 CFP funds for continuing interior renovation at Hamilton House and to repair two scattered-site roofs. Commissioner DuFour moved to approve Resolution No. 608, Resolution of the Housing Authority of St. Louis Park to accept the 2011 Capital Fund Program Grant, and Commissioner Kaufman seconded the motion. The motion passed 4-0. f. Semi Annual Housing Programs Report – First Half 2011 Ms. Larsen stated the purpose of the report is to update the HA Board of housing programs and activity. The report was submitted to the City Council at its August 8, 2011 meeting. No action is required of the Board. City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 4g) Page 3 Subject: Housing Authority Meeting Minutes of September 14, 2011 7. Communications from Executive Director a. Claims List – August & September, 2011 b. Communications 1. Monthly Report – August & September, 2011 2. Draft Financial Statements – August, 2011 8. Other 9. Adjournment Commissioner DuFour moved to adjourn the meeting, and Commissioner Kaufman seconded the motion. The motion passed 4-0. The meeting adjourned at 6:05 p.m. Respectfully submitted, _________________________ Renee DuFour, Secretary Meeting Date: November 21, 2011 Agenda Item #: 4h Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance Presentation Other: EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other: Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other: TITLE: Vendor Claims. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to accept for filing Vendor Claims for the period October 8, 2011 through November 11, 2011. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. BACKGROUND: The Finance Department prepares this report on a monthly basis for Council’s review. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: None. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. Attachments: Vendor Claims Prepared by: Connie Neubeck, Account Clerk 11/16/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:13:35R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 1Page -Council Check Summary 11/11/2011 -10/8/2011 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 83.36FABRICATIONOTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES3M 83.36 416.00SKATEBOARD PROGRAMS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES3RD LAIR SKATEPARK 416.00 966.15SANDING/SALTING EQUIPMENT PARTSA&K EQUIPMENT CO INC 966.15 68.37PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESA-1 OUTDOOR POWER INC 621.31TREE MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 502.57TREE MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 1,192.25 5,500.00-GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS BAL S RETAINED PERCENTAGEA.M.E. CONSTRUCTION CORP 110,000.00GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 104,500.00 2,500.00ESCROWSDEMO / BROOKSIDE TRAFFICAAA LAMBERTS LANDSCAPE PRODUCT 53.25STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 2,553.25 123.72HOLIDAY PROGRAMS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESABERNATHY, LISA 123.72 57.23SEWER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT PARTSABLE HOSE & RUBBER INC 57.23 11,747.86GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESABM JANITORIAL SERVICES 11,747.86 636.00PRE-SCHOOL PROGRAMS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESABRAKADOODLE 636.00 225.00MOVE-UP PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESACACIA ARCHITECTS LLC 225.00 2,731.50EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESADVANTAGE HEALTH CORPORATION 2,731.50 4,803.50WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESAE2S 1,524.29WATER UTILITY G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 2 11/16/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:13:35R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 2Page -Council Check Summary 11/11/2011 -10/8/2011 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 6,327.79 1,260.00PE INVEST/REVIEW/PER IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDIAECOM INC 11,605.49REILLY BUDGET GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 12,865.49 9,970.00PAINTINGOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESAERIAL PAINTING INC 9,970.00 92.98PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESAIM ELECTRONICS 92.98 79.88OPERATIONSOPERATIONAL SUPPLIESAIRGAS NORTH CENTRAL 79.88 8,819.02-GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS BAL S RETAINED PERCENTAGEALBERS MECHANICAL SERVICES INC 176,380.40GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 167,561.38 225.00MOVE-UP PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESALBERTSSON HANSEN ARCHITECTURE 225.00 282.91OPERATIONSREPAIRSALEX AIR APPARATUS INC 282.91 170.00CABLE TV G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEALEX AUDIO & VIDEO 170.00 196.34ELEVATOR MTCE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEALL CITY ELEVATOR INC 196.34 300.00HALLOWEEN PARTY OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESALLDAFFER, BARBARA 300.00 1,603.13GENERAL REPAIR SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSALLDATA 1,603.13 2,500.00ADMINISTRATION G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSALLIANCE FOR INNOVATION 2,500.00 39,817.50MUNICIPAL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDIALLIANCE MECH SRVCS INC 39,817.50 City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 3 11/16/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:13:35R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 3Page -Council Check Summary 11/11/2011 -10/8/2011 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 359.22SEALCOAT PREPARATION OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESALLIED BLACKTOP 359.22 369.00PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDIAMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING I 369.00 1,099.64CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDIAMERICAN FLAGPOLE & FLAG CO 1,099.64 74.82POLICE G & A TELEPHONEAMERICAN MESSAGING 74.82 58.63PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYAMERICAN TIRE DISTRIBUTORS 58.63 273.47GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE OPERATIONAL SUPPLIESAMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SER 343.90PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 279.44PARK MAINTENANCE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 146.31ENTERPRISE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 279.32VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 140.74WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 140.73SEWER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 23.45STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 1,627.36 1,168.90SUPPORT SERVICES G&A OFFICE SUPPLIESANCHOR PAPER CO 1,168.90 2,245.60INSTALLATIONOTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESANDERSEN INC, EARL 660.97FABRICATIONOTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 2,906.57 27.26WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT PARTSANDERSON, SCOTT 766.59WATER UTILITY G&A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 793.85 958.35GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SUPPLYAPACHE GROUP OF MINNESOTA 661.13BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,619.48 152.19NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESAQUILA NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 4 11/16/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:13:35R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 4Page -Council Check Summary 11/11/2011 -10/8/2011 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 152.19 780.14GENERAL CUSTODIAL DUTIES CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SUPPLYARAMARK UNIFORM CORP ACCTS 780.14 1,185.14ARENA MAINTENANCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICEARENA SERVICES & PRODUCTS 1,185.14 375.00FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESARROW LIFT 375.00 445.50PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYASPEN EQUIPMENT CO 218.44GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 663.94 433.75OPERATIONSOPERATIONAL SUPPLIESASPEN MILLS 433.75 34.21E-911 PROGRAM TELEPHONEAT&T 34.21 937.50POLICE G & A TRAININGATOM 937.50 170.95PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYAUTO ELECTRIC OF BLOOMINGTON I 170.95 238.50WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEAUTOMATIC SYSTEMS INC 238.50 65.79GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEAUTOMOBILE SERVICE 65.79 2,619.51GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURESAVI SYSTEMS INC 2,619.51 80.00INSPECTIONS G & A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCEBAC LOCAL SERVICES ESCALATIONS 80.00 68.34ENVIRONMENTAL G & A LANDSCAPING MATERIALSBACHMAN'S PLYMOUTH 68.34 City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 5 11/16/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:13:35R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 5Page -Council Check Summary 11/11/2011 -10/8/2011 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 3,751.16REFORESTATIONLANDSCAPING MATERIALSBACHMANS 3,751.16 39.00HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESBARNA, GUZY & STEFFEN LTD 39.00 50.00GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESBARTO, DEREK 50.00 54.38BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESBATTERIES PLUS 126.10WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 180.48 510.00E-911 PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESBCA MNJIS SECTION 510.00 1,220.55ARENA MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIESBECKER ARENA PRODUCTS 8,913.38ARENA MAINTENANCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 10,133.93 1,400.00GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A RENTAL BUILDINGSBELT LINE PROPERTIES INC 1,400.00 467.50CLERICALTRAININGBENCHMARK LEARNING 467.50 41,875.00ESCROWSGENERALBENILDE-ST MARGARET'S SCHOOL 41,875.00 7,762.50REILLY BUDGET OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICEBERGERSON CASWELL INC 7,762.50 225.00MOVE-UP PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESBERGFORD ARCHITECTURE, JOHN 225.00 179.82WATER UTILITY G&A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CARBERTHIAUME, BRUCE 179.82 231.44ORGANIZED REC G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CARBIRNO, RICK 231.44 1,246.21CONSTRUCTION PAYMENTS IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDIBIT TECH INSTALLATION LLC City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 6 11/16/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:13:35R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 6Page -Council Check Summary 11/11/2011 -10/8/2011 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 1,246.21 447.70NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESBLACKSTONE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN 447.70 96.43E BYRNE JAG 2009-10 SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTATBLOMSNESS, MATT 96.43 12,000.00-PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH FOR FUTURE EXPENDITURESBNSF RAILWAY COMPANY 12,000.00PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH UNRESERV/UNDESIGN 12,000.00PARK MAINTENANCE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 12,000.00 116.52INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESBOBIER, HEIDI 116.52 2,623.40GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEBOYER FORD TRUCKS 2,623.40 185.88PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYBOYER TRUCK PARTS 136.40GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 322.28 1,377.51GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A LANDBRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 8,020.88GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 285.00WATER UTILITY G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 9,683.39 570.00-GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS BAL S RETAINED PERCENTAGEBREDEMUS HARDWARE COMPANY INC 11,400.00GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 10,830.00 260.00GOLFOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESBROOKVIEW GOLF COURSE 260.00 250.00NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESBROWNDALE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIA 250.00 215.00INSPECTIONS G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTSBRUNES, THOMAS & THERESA 215.00 1,531.51PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESBRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 7 11/16/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:13:35R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 7Page -Council Check Summary 11/11/2011 -10/8/2011 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 1,531.51 150.00GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESBURKE, MICHAEL & KATE 150.00 4,586.28ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL SERVICESCAMPBELL KNUTSON PROF ASSOC 77.50GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 158.75STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 30.00WATER UTILITY G&A LEGAL SERVICES 4,852.53 12,000.00ESCROWSPMC ESCROWCARPENTER, KEN 12,000.00 1,144.62IT G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICECARTRIDGE CARE 1,144.62 247.48EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESCBIZ FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS INC 247.48 200.60INSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESCDW GOVERNMENT INC 961.12TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 1,161.72 81.21PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYCEDAR SMALL ENGINE 81.21 13,228.18DISCOUNT LOAN PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESCENTER ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT 2,230.00MOVE-UP PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 34,260.00TRANSFORMATION LOAN OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,900.00LIVE WHERE YOU WORK PRGM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 53,618.18 335.43FACILITY OPERATIONS HEATING GASCENTERPOINT ENERGY 280.79PARK MAINTENANCE G & A HEATING GAS 17.69WESTWOOD G & A HEATING GAS 34.72NATURALIST PROGRAMMER HEATING GAS 1,861.43WATER UTILITY G&A HEATING GAS 37.36REILLY G & A HEATING GAS 48.18SEWER UTILITY G&A ELECTRIC SERVICE 675.93SEWER UTILITY G&A HEATING GAS 3,291.53 City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 8 11/16/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:13:35R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 8Page -Council Check Summary 11/11/2011 -10/8/2011 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 494.61FACILITY OPERATIONS HEATING GASCENTERPOINT ENERGY SERVICES IN 5,103.85ENTERPRISE G & A HEATING GAS 5,598.46 893.87SUPPORT SERVICES G&A OFFICE SUPPLIESCENTRAL ENVELOPE CORPORATION 893.87 10,400.00EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S OTHER RETIREMENTCENTRAL PENSION FUND 10,400.00 38.40E-911 PROGRAM TELEPHONECENTURY LINK 38.40 4,000.00ESCROWSDEMO / BROOKSIDE TRAFFICCERMAK, CINAMIN 4,000.00 603.32-GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTSCHEMUNG SUPPLY 9,378.92SNOW PLOWING EQUIPMENT PARTS 8,775.60 385.00SOLID WASTE G&A OTHERCHINOOK BOOK 385.00 2,500.00SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICECICHY'S WATER & SEWER 2,500.00 45.75FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESCINTAS FIRST AID & SAFETY 45.75 44.96-GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTSCITIZENS INDEPENDENT BANK 26.45ADMINISTRATION G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 64.00ADMINISTRATION G & A POSTAGE 17.22ADMINISTRATION G & A MEETING EXPENSE 18.87HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL SUPPLIES 250.00HUMAN RESOURCES RECOGNITION 1,219.40HUMAN RESOURCES TRAINING 134.95COMM & MARKETING G & A TELEPHONE 45.92IT G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 2,349.15IT G & A OFFICE EQUIPMENT 104.80IT G & A TELEPHONE 182.35DESKTOP SUPPORT/SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 9 11/16/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:13:35R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 9Page -Council Check Summary 11/11/2011 -10/8/2011 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 35.00FINANCE G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 461.72FINANCE G & A TRAVEL/MEETINGS 505.75COMM DEV PLANNING G & A TRAINING 70.39GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 2,284.88GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE OTHER 15.98POLICE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 72.30POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 64.33POLICE G & A POLICE EQUIPMENT 244.97ERUTRAINING 369.00COMMUNICATIONS/GV REIMBURSEABL TRAINING 3,088.19E BYRNE JAG 2009-10 SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 11.05OPERATIONSOFFICE SUPPLIES 105.31OPERATIONSGENERAL SUPPLIES 502.15OPERATIONSOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 17.11OPERATIONSSMALL TOOLS 1,032.50OPERATIONSSUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 154.82OPERATIONSTRAINING 39.90INSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 59.95INSPECTIONS G & A TRAINING 115.83ENGINEERING G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 450.00ENGINEERING G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 1,159.09PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORY 216.20-PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 52.13ORGANIZED REC G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 47.00ORGANIZED REC G & A TRAINING 44.10ADULT PROGRAMS GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,504.00ADULT PROGRAMS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,666.25HOLIDAY PROGRAMS GENERAL SUPPLIES 446.24PARK MAINTENANCE G & A SMALL TOOLS 25.00PARK MAINTENANCE G & A TRAINING 42.73WESTWOOD G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 209.35HALLOWEEN PARTY GENERAL SUPPLIES 682.93INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS GENERAL SUPPLIES 196.17AQUATIC PARK BUDGET OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 199.48VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A OFFICE SUPPLIES 389.02VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 120.00VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 81.70-CABLE TV BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 1,799.88TV PRODUCTION NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 163.02OUTREACH & PROGRAMMING GENERAL SUPPLIES 496.59WATER UTILITY G&A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 510.00SOLID WASTE RECYCLING GRANT SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 10 11/16/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:13:35R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 10Page -Council Check Summary 11/11/2011 -10/8/2011 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 24,524.36 750.00HUMAN RESOURCES ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENTCITIZENS LEAGUE 750.00 171.15INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESCOLBORN, CHRISTINE 171.15 29,913.87ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL SERVICESCOLICH & ASSOCIATES 29,913.87 159.95IT G & A DATACOMMUNICATIONSCOMCAST 13.92-OPERATIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES 146.03 12,912.24SEALCOAT PREPARATION OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESCOMMERCIAL ASPHALT COMPANY 12,163.21PATCHING-PERMANENT OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 25,075.45 150.00ENGINEERING G & A TRAININGCOMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION 150.00 4,600.00PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESCONCRETE ETC INC 2,223.00AQUATIC PARK MAINTENANCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 1,777.25PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 8,600.25 543.02BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESCONTINENTAL RESEARCH CORP 543.02 16.23-GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTSCOOKE JP CO 252.23INSPECTIONS G & A PRINTING & PUBLISHING 236.00 50.00POLICE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSCOSTCO WHOLESALE MEMBERSHIP 50.00 109.01OPERATIONSGENERAL SUPPLIESCOUNTRY FLAGS 109.01 471.88DARE PROGRAM OPERATIONAL SUPPLIESCREATIVE PRODUCT SOURCING INC 471.88 City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 11 11/16/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:13:35R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 11Page -Council Check Summary 11/11/2011 -10/8/2011 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 1,418.71-GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS BAL S RETAINED PERCENTAGECROSSROAD CONSTRUCTION INC 28,374.20GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 26,955.49 7.83-GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTSCROWN MARKING INC 121.78SUPPORT SERVICES G&A OFFICE SUPPLIES 113.95 150.00COMMUNITY OUTREACH G & A TRAININGCSHS-CENTER FOR SOMALIA HISTOR 150.00NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH TRAINING 300.00 238.82POLICE G & A SUBSISTENCE SUPPLIESCUB FOODS 36.10ERUTRAINING 274.92 1,083.96FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICECUMMINS NPOWER LLC 446.28WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 1,530.24 91.96REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESCURRAN-BAKKEN, ERIC 91.96 5,126.95SSD 1 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESCUSTOM PRODUCTS & SERVICES 5,408.52SSD 2 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,628.35SSD 3 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 765.33SSD #4 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,366.61SSD #5 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 774.52SSD #6 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 15,070.28 9,664.01WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESDAKOTA SUPPLY GROUP 9,664.01 897.96GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SUPPLYDALCO ENTERPRISES INC 1,037.52BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,935.48 63.55WATER UTILITY G&A OFFICE SUPPLIESDAY-TIMERS INC 63.55 City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 12 11/16/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:13:35R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 12Page -Council Check Summary 11/11/2011 -10/8/2011 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 14,502.19EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A UNEMPLOYMENTDEPT EMPLOYMENT & ECONOMIC DEV 14,502.19 7,969.89INSPECTIONS G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTSDEPT LABOR & INDUSTRY 40.00BUILDING MAINTENANCE LICENSES 8,009.89 537.10ENTERPRISE G & A ADVERTISINGDEX MEDIA EAST LLC 537.10 327.64PATCHING-PERMANENT EQUIPMENT PARTSDISCOUNT STEEL INC 588.47SNOW PLOWING EQUIPMENT PARTS 366.54SANDING/SALTING EQUIPMENT PARTS 1,282.65 19,458.00INSTALLATIONOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESDJ ELECTRIC SERVICES INC 4,280.34PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 6,000.00PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 29,738.34 8,941.73GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURESDLR GROUP KKE 8,941.73 30.00ENGINEERING G & A PUBLIC WORKSDMJ CORPORATION 30.00 23,781.87SUPPORT SERVICES G&A POSTAGEDO-GOOD.BIZ INC 180.24NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 23,962.11 16,300.00STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICEDRYDEN EXCAVATING INC 16,300.00 3,206.31TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENTDYNAMIC IMAGING SYSTEMS INC 3,206.31 592.61BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESECOLAB INC 592.61 80.46WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERSEDINA REALTY TITLE 80.46 City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 13 11/16/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:13:35R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 13Page -Council Check Summary 11/11/2011 -10/8/2011 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 358.00SYSTEM REPAIR OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESEGAN COMPANIES INC 358.00 1,585.002005A GO IMPROVEMENT BOND G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESEHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 1,566.672007A UTIL REV BOND PROJECTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 225.002010B UTIL REV BONDS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 783.332007A UTIL REV BOND PROJECTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 225.002010B UTIL REV BONDS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,385.00 60.98INSPECTIONS G & A BUILDINGELDER-JONES BUILDING PERMIT SE 60.98 237.71SEWER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT PARTSELECTRIC PUMP INC 237.71 1,000.00ESCROWSPMC ESCROWELSTROM, MARTHA 1,000.00 90.67PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYEMERGENCY APPARATUS MTNCE 2,872.09GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 2,962.76 900.08PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYEMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOG 900.08 745.00ESCROWSPMC ESCROWENTERPRISE RS LLC 745.00 292.04WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERSERICKSON, DEBBIE 292.04 73.22REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESERIKSON, ROY 73.22 2,992.00IT G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESESP SYSTEMS PROFESSIONALS INC 2,720.00NETWORK SUPPORT SERVICES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5,712.00 8,273.19STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICEESS BROTHERS & SONS INC 8,273.19 City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 14 11/16/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:13:35R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 14Page -Council Check Summary 11/11/2011 -10/8/2011 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 34,699.12SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS RECYCLING SERVICEEUREKA RECYCLING 34,699.12 202.78PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYFACTORY MOTOR PARTS CO 47.90VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 380.30PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SUPPLY 630.98 15.10SANDING/SALTING EQUIPMENT PARTSFASTENAL COMPANY 10.12PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 171.06BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 96.53SSD #5 G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 292.81 39.89HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL SUPPLIESFEDEX 40.94GENERAL INFORMATION MAPS/PRINTED MATERIALS 33.78POLICE G & A POSTAGE 27.27E-911 PROGRAM POSTAGE 141.88 2,505.71WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESFERGUSON WATERWORKS 2,505.71 84.58CABLE TV G & A OFFICE EQUIPMENTFERRELL, LESLIE 84.58 187.68ICE RESURFACER MOTOR FUELSFERRELLGAS 187.68 229.00ADMINISTRATION G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSFINANCE & COMMERCE 229.00 538.59OPERATIONSOPERATIONAL SUPPLIESFIRE EQUIPMENT SPECIALTIES INC 338.02OPERATIONSFIRE EQUIPMENT 876.61 70.00OPERATIONSSUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSFIRE MARSHAL ASSOC OF MN 70.00 350.15OPERATIONSOPERATIONAL SUPPLIESFIRE SAFETY USA INC 350.15 City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 15 11/16/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:13:35R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 15Page -Council Check Summary 11/11/2011 -10/8/2011 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 136.80PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESFLAGSHIP RECREATION 136.80 914.00MUNICIPAL BLDG BUILDINGS & STRUCTURESFLOYD TOTAL SECURITY 914.00 31.16-PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH DUE TO OTHER GOVTSFORESTRY SUPPLIERS INC 484.42REFORESTATIONLANDSCAPING MATERIALS 453.26 139.63E BYRNE JAG 2009-10 SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTATFORSTER, JAY 139.63 285.00STORM WATER UTILITY G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDIFOTH INFRASTRUCTURE & ENVIRONM 285.00 2,956.68-GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS BAL S RETAINED PERCENTAGEFRATTALONE COMPANIES INC 59,133.68GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 56,177.00 2,745.37-PARK IMPROVE BALANCE SHEET RETAINED PERCENTAGEFRIEDGES LANDSCAPING INC 54,907.28PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 52,161.91 20.26WATER UTILITY G&A OFFICE SUPPLIESG S DIRECT 20.26 10.75NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESGAINES, MARY BETH 10.75 11.20HALLOWEEN PARTY PROGRAM REVENUEGALLAGHER, GAIL 11.20 26.72SANDING/SALTING EQUIPMENT PARTSGARELICK STEEL CO 833.63PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 860.35 3,471.55ARENA MAINTENANCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICEGARTNER REFRIG & MFG INC 3,471.55 40.26NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESGASPARD, CHRIS 40.26 City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 16 11/16/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:13:35R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 16Page -Council Check Summary 11/11/2011 -10/8/2011 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 64.04REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESGILLES, STEVE 64.04 45.95PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIESGLASS & MIRROR OUTLET 45.95 205.59INSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESGLEASON PRINTING 205.59 6,742.56AQUATIC PARK MAINTENANCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICEGLOBAL SPECIALTY CONTRACTORS I 6,742.56 4,220.80EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S LONG TERM CARE INSURGLTC PREMIUM PAYMENTS 4,220.80 1,138.25WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICEGOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 1,138.25 150.00FINANCE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSGOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS AS 150.00 286.08GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIESGRAINGER INC, WW 122.91OPERATIONSOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 558.37INSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 120.46PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORY 142.80WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,230.62 1,175.00SNOW PLOWING SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSGREAT LAKES WEATHER SERVICE 1,175.00 119.64GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEGREEN ACRES SPRINKLER CO 119.64 577.11WEED CONTROL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESGREEN HORIZONS 577.11 833.22PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE LANDSCAPING SERVICEGREENLIFE SUPPLY LLC 187.03TREE MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,020.25 City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 17 11/16/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:13:35R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 17Page -Council Check Summary 11/11/2011 -10/8/2011 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 798.60SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESGULLICKSON, MARJORY 798.60 1,000.00ESCROWSDEMO / BROOKSIDE TRAFFICGUNN, GERALD DAMON 1,000.00 875.00SOCCEROTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESHACHEM, DRISS 875.00 200.00FOOTBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESHAMILTON, MIKE 200.00 157.90-GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS BAL S RETAINED PERCENTAGEHANSON STRUCTURAL PRECAST INC 3,158.00GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 3,000.10 27.75WESTWOOD G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CARHASLERUD, CARRIE 27.75 2,622.74BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESHAWKINS INC 8,378.70WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 11,001.44 119.15IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESHD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD 32.06WATER UTILITY G&A SMALL TOOLS 267.33STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 418.54 306.80STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESHEDBERG AGGREGATES 306.80 188.77HALLOWEEN PARTY GENERAL SUPPLIESHEGNA, JESSICA 6.64HALLOWEEN PARTY CONCESSION SUPPLIES 195.41 534.38IT G & A COMPUTER SERVICESHENNEPIN COUNTY INFO TECH 2,265.00POLICE G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 800.00OPERATIONSRADIO COMMUNICATIONS 256.00OPERATIONSEMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 3,855.38 1,265.00OPERATIONSTRAININGHENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 18 11/16/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:13:35R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 18Page -Council Check Summary 11/11/2011 -10/8/2011 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 1,265.00 1,842.83POLICE G & A SUBSISTENCE SERVICEHENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFIC 1,842.83 2,700.00POLICE G & A SUBSISTENCE SERVICEHENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 25,944.00PARK MAINTENANCE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 302.98PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE 1,378.00ENTERPRISE G & A BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 9,656.00PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 25.00EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 40,005.98 78.00INSPECTIONS G & A PLUMBINGHIGHVIEW PLUMBING INC 5,450.00SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 5,528.00 135.13GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESHIRSHFIELDS 135.13 91.24REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESHOFFMANN, MICHAEL & JEAN 91.24 290.78TREE INJECTION TREE MAINTENANCEHOLLENHORST, THOMAS 290.78 405.17GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESHOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 11.04-SNOW PLOWING GENERAL SUPPLIES 134.78SNOW PLOWING EQUIPMENT PARTS 85.67SANDING/SALTING EQUIPMENT PARTS 86.33SNOW HAULING GENERAL SUPPLIES 16.96TRAFFIC CONTROL OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 138.65PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 326.49MOWINGGENERAL SUPPLIES 127.74PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 127.05BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 24.22WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,462.02 79.99GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESHOME HARDWARE 10.24ENGINEERING G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 95.76PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 19 11/16/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:13:35R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 19Page -Council Check Summary 11/11/2011 -10/8/2011 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 266.97PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 15.48WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 468.44 270.00ATHLETIC CAMPS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESHOPKINS-MINNETONKA RECREATION 270.00 223.42GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIESHOTSY EQUIPMENT OF MN 223.42 2,500.00ESCROWSDEMO / BROOKSIDE TRAFFICHOWARD, WILLIE 2,500.00 455.00KICKBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESHOWES, JEFFREY 455.00 175.00KICKBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESHOWES, KRISTINE 175.00 600.00IT G & A COMPUTER SERVICESHRGREEN 600.00 86.92WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESHSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 290.03HALLOWEEN PARTY GENERAL SUPPLIES 15.96SCHOOL GROUPS GENERAL SUPPLIES 10.99SCHOOLGENERAL SUPPLIES 403.90 202.45PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYI-STATE TRUCK CENTER 202.45 1,595.25EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S UNION DUESI.U.O.E. LOCAL NO 49 1,595.25 1,255.61WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEIDEAL SERVICE INC 1,255.61 245.81POLICE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIESIDENTISYS 245.81 68.79REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESIDZOREK, EDWARD & JULIE 68.79 City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 20 11/16/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:13:35R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 20Page -Council Check Summary 11/11/2011 -10/8/2011 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 1,178.53IT G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEIKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS 1,178.53 323.37WATER UTILITY G&A POSTAGEIMPACT PROVEN SOLUTIONS 323.37SEWER UTILITY G&A POSTAGE 323.37SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS POSTAGE 323.38STORM WATER UTILITY G&A POSTAGE 1,293.49 4,975.14IT G & A TELEPHONEINTEGRA TELECOM 4,975.14 374.63PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYINVER GROVE FORD 374.63 10.00HUMAN RESOURCES TRAININGIPMA-HR MINNESOTA 10.00 182.27ADMINISTRATION G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESIRON MOUNTAIN 134.16POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 316.43 240.00ENVIRONMENTAL G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSISA 240.00 73.09WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERSJAVUREK, KAREN 73.09 392.88INSPECTIONS G & A PLUMBINGJECHE EXCAVATING 392.88 29,878.00SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICEJEDLICKI INC, G F 29,878.00 9.60SPECIAL EVENTS GENERAL SUPPLIESJERRY'S MIRACLE MILE 47.26PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 16.34GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES 20.94WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT PARTS 94.14 164.35IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESJOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES/LESCO City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 21 11/16/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:13:35R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 21Page -Council Check Summary 11/11/2011 -10/8/2011 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 164.35 330.00KICKBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESJOHNSON, SUSAN 330.00 10.00SPECIAL PROGRAMS PROGRAM REVENUEJORDAN, KELLY 10.00 836.75TREE MAINTENANCE CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICEK C GROVES TREE EXPERTS 836.75 905.20PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYKATH FUEL OIL SERVICE 905.20 553.84EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S WAGE GARNISHMENTSKELLER, JASMINE Z 553.84 96.00ESCROWSGRECO DEVELOP/WOODDALE POINTEKENNEDY & GRAVEN 45.00SUNSET RIDGE LEGAL SERVICES 141.00 260.00-WATER UTILITY BALANCE SHEET RETAINED PERCENTAGEKEYS WELL DRILLING CO 5,200.00CONSTRUCTION PAYMENTS IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 4,940.00 1,134.00OPERATIONSGENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESKIDCAPERS PORTRAITS 1,134.00 40.00TENNISPROGRAM REVENUEKIDS TEAM TENNIS 40.00 804.00NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESKIRCHNER, TODD 263.00NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT PUBLIC LIABILITY INSURANCE 1,067.00 325.00EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESKITCHENWERKS 325.00 282.22TREE INJECTION TREE MAINTENANCEKOEHLER, CHARLES 282.22 78,501.12GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURESKRAUS-ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION CO City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 22 11/16/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:13:35R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 22Page -Council Check Summary 11/11/2011 -10/8/2011 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 78,501.12 4,219.00PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESKRECH, O'BRIEN, MUELLER & WASS 4,219.00 195.73GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIESKRUGE-AIR INC 195.73 60.34REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESKURZEKA, LOUISE 60.34 416.53RELAMPINGOTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESLARSON, JH CO 167.47SYSTEM REPAIR OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 475.10PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 430.39BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,489.49 7,769.82TREE REPLACEMENT TREE REPLACEMENTLAUREL TREE FARMS 7,769.82 2,226.00EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S UNION DUESLAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES 2,226.00 192.71GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIESLAWSON PRODUCTS INC 192.71 6,780.00EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A League of MN Cities dept'l expLEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 6,780.00 40.00ADMINISTRATION G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTATLEAGUE OF MN CITIES 40.00 650.00UNINSURED LOSS G&A UNINSURED LOSSLEAGUE OF MN CITIES INSURANCE 650.00 276.28INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESLENTNER, LAURA 276.28 400.00BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICELEVASSEUR, KURT 400.00 14.91WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERSLEVINE, IRVING City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 23 11/16/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:13:35R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 23Page -Council Check Summary 11/11/2011 -10/8/2011 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 14.91 2,053.24MUNICIPAL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDILIGHTING HOUSE USA INC 2,053.24 96.13PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYLIND ELECTRONICS INC 96.13 32,930.21E-911 PROGRAM OFFICE FURNITURE & EQUIPMENTLOFFLER COMPANIES 32,930.21 41,182.00IT G & A COMPUTER SERVICESLOGIS 11,535.03TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 52,717.03 184.98PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYLOWELL'S REFINISH MASTERS 184.98 2,408.13UNINSURED LOSS G&A UNINSURED LOSSMAACO AUTO PAINTING 2,408.13 93.43PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYMACQUEEN EQUIP CO 111.34SEWER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT PARTS 204.77 210.30HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESMADDEN GALANTER HANSEN LLP 210.30 5,269.17SSD 1 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESMAPLE CREST LANDSCAPE 177.00SSD 2 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 177.00SSD 3 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 354.00SSD #4 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,977.17 210.00INSPECTIONS G & A TRAININGMBPTA 210.00 100.00SOCCEROTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESMCCHESNEY, CHARLIE 100.00 112.16REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESMCCHESNEY, WAYNE 112.16 City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 24 11/16/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:13:35R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 24Page -Council Check Summary 11/11/2011 -10/8/2011 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 144.01INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESMCGREGOR-HANNAH, MAREN 144.01 607.21TREE INJECTION TREE MAINTENANCEMCIVOR & S M YASUDA, R S 607.21 924.03COMM DEV PLANNING G & A TRAININGMCMONIGAL, MEG 924.03 66.20EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESMECKLE, JODIE 66.20 125.00POLICE G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESMEDTOX LABORATORIES INC 125.00 1,000.00ESCROWSDEMO / BROOKSIDE TRAFFICMEIER, DWAYNE 1,000.00 40.00OPERATIONSSUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSMEMA 40.00 126.92WESTWOOD G & A SMALL TOOLSMENARDS 70.72HALLOWEEN PARTY GENERAL SUPPLIES 197.64 106.28ARENA MAINTENANCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICEMERIT ELECTRIC COMPANY 106.28 87.69PUBLIC WORKS G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CARMERKLEY, SCOTT 87.69 16,144.12SEWER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERSMETHODIST HOSPITAL 16,144.12 297.28OPERATIONSEQUIPMENT PARTSMETRO FIRE INC 297.28 660.00VOLLEYBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESMETRO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS 660.00 16,847.65INSPECTIONS G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTSMETROPOLITAN COUNCIL City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 25 11/16/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:13:35R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 25Page -Council Check Summary 11/11/2011 -10/8/2011 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 298,059.29OPERATIONSCLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 314,906.94 384.46GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURESMICHELS CORPORATION 6,907.24TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 7,291.70 5,900.84IT G & A OFFICE EQUIPMENTMID AMERICA BUSINESS SYSTEMS 830.00POLICE G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 2,832.06TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 9,562.90 550.00PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDIMIDWEST FENCE & MFG 550.00 3,665.00WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESMIDWEST TESTING LLC 3,665.00 366.00PAWN FEES OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESMINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPT 366.00 184.19HOLIDAY PROGRAMS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESMINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN CO 184.19 151.62EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S ACCRUED OTHER BENEFITSMINNESOTA BENEFIT ASSOC 151.62 245.08GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEMINNESOTA CONWAY 245.08 1,018.88GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET CLEARING ACCOUNTMINNESOTA DEPT COMMERCE 1,018.88 155.00HUMAN RESOURCES RECRUITMENTMINNESOTA FIRE SVC CERT BD 155.00 16.00EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S ACCRUED OTHER BENEFITSMINNESOTA NCPERS LIFE INS 16.00 23.31-GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTSMITOGRAPHERS INC 362.43INSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 339.12 City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 26 11/16/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:13:35R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 26Page -Council Check Summary 11/11/2011 -10/8/2011 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 540.00WATER UTILITY G&A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTATMN AWWA 540.00 2.75-GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTSMNFIAM BOOK SALES 42.75OPERATIONSTRAINING 40.00 65.40PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYMORRIE'S PARTS & SERVICE GROUP 65.40 17.60COMM DEV PLANNING G & A TRAININGMORRISON, GARY 89.09COMM DEV PLANNING G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 106.69 119.24REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESMOSHER, NINA 119.24 34.02PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYMTI DISTRIBUTING CO 34.02 231.00REILLY BUDGET OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESMVTL LABORATORIES 231.00 95.00INSPECTIONS G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSN E H A 95.00 1,980.00-GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS BAL S RETAINED PERCENTAGENAC MECHANICAL & ELECTRICAL SE 39,600.00GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 37,620.00 7.90ROUTINE MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESNAPA (GENUINE PARTS CO) 22.84SANDING/SALTING GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,518.88PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORY 19.81PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,497.28GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES 63.19SSD 3 G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 5.39WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 69.37WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT PARTS 3,204.66 172.00INSPECTIONS G & A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCENARULA, VIKAS City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 27 11/16/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:13:35R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 27Page -Council Check Summary 11/11/2011 -10/8/2011 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 172.00 3,000.00ESCROWSPMC ESCROWNECHAS, JEFF 3,000.00 1,220.00EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A TUITIONNELSON, BRENDA 1,220.00 44.09VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIESNEP CORP 44.09 1,161.25-GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET CLEARING ACCOUNTNEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 104.36ADMINISTRATION G & A TELEPHONE 155.59HUMAN RESOURCES TELEPHONE 410.62RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT TELEPHONE 104.36ASSESSING G & A TELEPHONE 155.59FINANCE G & A TELEPHONE 360.58EDA / HA REIMBURSEMENT TELEPHONE 897.24POLICE G & A TELEPHONE 409.69OPERATIONSTELEPHONE 104.36INSPECTIONS G & A TELEPHONE 359.62ENGINEERING G & A TELEPHONE 510.35PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A TELEPHONE 158.07PARK AND REC G&A TELEPHONE 352.55ORGANIZED REC G & A TELEPHONE 350.46PARK MAINTENANCE G & A TELEPHONE 109.70ENVIRONMENTAL G & A TELEPHONE 232.29WESTWOOD G & A TELEPHONE 69.49REC CENTER/AQUATIC PARK SAL TELEPHONE 105.60VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A TELEPHONE 413.22WATER UTILITY G&A TELEPHONE 219.49SEWER UTILITY G&A TELEPHONE 70.83SOLID WASTE G&A TELEPHONE 4,492.81 50.00HUMAN RESOURCES TRAININGNORTHSTAR CHAPTER 50.00 160.83-STREET CAPITAL PROJ BAL SHEET RETAINED PERCENTAGENORTHWEST ASPHALT CORP 3,216.55CONSTRUCTION PAYMENTS IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 3,055.72 City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 28 11/16/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:13:35R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 28Page -Council Check Summary 11/11/2011 -10/8/2011 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 2,980.00GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET UNREALIZED REVENUENORTHWEST METRO DRUG TASK FORC 2,980.00 150.00ORGANIZED REC G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSNRPA 150.00 1,141.06PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYNUSS TRUCK & EQUIPMENT 1,141.06 12,663.21COMM & MARKETING G & A PRINTING & PUBLISHINGNYSTROM PUBLISHING 12,663.21 1,000.00POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESOAK KNOLL ANIMAL HOSPITAL 1,000.00 205.91INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESOBERSTAR, KATIE 205.91 371.93ADMINISTRATION G & A OFFICE SUPPLIESOFFICE DEPOT 472.69HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICE SUPPLIES 87.64HUMAN RESOURCES ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT 143.17SUPPORT SERVICES G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 226.06FINANCE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 291.78POLICE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 32.22POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 158.60INSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 302.50PUBLIC WORKS G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 151.04ORGANIZED REC G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 84.73WESTWOOD G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 60.20WATER UTILITY G&A OFFICE SUPPLIES 2,382.56 20,014.13HABITAT FOR HUMANITY PERMANENT IMPROVEMNT REVOLVINGOLD REPUBLIC TITLE 20,014.13 58.13SANDING/SALTING EQUIPMENT PARTSOLSEN CHAIN & CABLE CO INC 262.80PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 320.93 4,605.39PORTABLE TOILETS/FIELD MAINT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESON SITE SANITATION 171.00OFF-LEASH DOG PARK OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 213.76WESTWOOD G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 29 11/16/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:13:35R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 29Page -Council Check Summary 11/11/2011 -10/8/2011 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 108.21NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 53.44SOLID WASTE G&A OTHER 5,151.80 235.45EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESOPTUM HEALTH FINANCIAL SERVICE 235.45 133.20INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESPAPP, MELISSA 133.20 497.66NEIGHBORHOOD PUBLIC ART OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESPARK THEATER COMPANY 497.66 300.00PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESPARKING MARKING INC 300.00 209.95INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESPARR, MELISSA 209.95 139.12GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIESPARTS ASSOCIATES INC 139.12 1,000.00ESCROWSPMC ESCROWPATRIOT BUSINESS GROUP 1,000.00 425.00BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICEPBBS EQUIPMENT CORP 425.00 30.04ENGINEERING G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIESPECCHIA, TOM 30.04 1,905.00COMM & MARKETING G & A PRINTING & PUBLISHINGPERNSTEINER CREATIVE GROUP INC 1,905.00 20.00HUMAN RIGHTS SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTATPETTY CASH 7.16POLICE G & A BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 30.00POLICE G & A MEETING EXPENSE 21.50POLICE G & A LICENSES 78.66 25.61WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESPETTY CASH - WWNC 14.39FAMILY PROGRAMS GENERAL SUPPLIES City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 30 11/16/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:13:35R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 30Page -Council Check Summary 11/11/2011 -10/8/2011 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 8.35HALLOWEEN PARTY GENERAL SUPPLIES 48.35 1,000.00ESCROWSPMC ESCROWPEVZNER & YEROSHEVSKAYA 1,000.00 2,574.62PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESPHILIP'S TREE CARE INC 2,574.62 653.86WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEPLANT & FLANGED EQUIPMENT 653.86 160.00CLERICALTRAININGPLEAA 160.00 100.00NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH TRAININGPLYMOUTH POLICE DEPARTMENT 50.00CLERICALTRAINING 100.00SUPERVISORYTRAINING 250.00 1,192.61INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESPOLK, MARLA 1,192.61 8,115.83PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYPOMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC 8,115.83 722.50PARK MAINTENANCE G & A TELEPHONEPOPP TELECOM 722.50 39.20YOUTH PROGRAMS PROGRAM REVENUEPOST, MARNIE 39.20 4,500.00COMM & MARKETING G & A POSTAGEPOSTMASTER - PERMIT #603 471.73WATER UTILITY G&A POSTAGE 471.73SEWER UTILITY G&A POSTAGE 471.72SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS POSTAGE 471.72STORM WATER UTILITY G&A POSTAGE 6,386.90 85.93PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESPRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN 85.93 City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 31 11/16/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:13:35R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 31Page -Council Check Summary 11/11/2011 -10/8/2011 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 319.70STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICEPRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC 319.70 7,214.59TREE DISEASE PUBLIC CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICEPRECISION LANDSCAPE & TREE 431.25PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 7,645.84 355.09IT G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESPRESSWRITE PRINTING INC 355.09 198.00ICE RESURFACER EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEPRINTERS SERVICE INC 198.00 968.76WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESPROGRESSIVE CONSULTING ENGINEE 968.76 457.71BLDG/GROUNDS OPS & MAINT BUILDING MTCE SERVICEPUMP & METER SERVICE 220.71BLDG/GROUNDS OPS & MAINT EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 678.42 1,090.00WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICEQ3 CONTRACTING 1,246.24SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 10,661.25STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 12,997.49 200.00GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESQUAN, JAMES 200.00 54.26VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A POSTAGEQUICKSILVER EXPRESS COURIER 54.26 683.98ICE RESURFACER EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICER & R SPECIALTIES 683.98 5,900.00ESCROWSPMC ESCROWRABINOWITZ, JACOB & MIRIAM 5,900.00 2,455.91FACILITY OPERATIONS GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICERANDY'S SANITATION INC 1,071.25REC CENTER BUILDING GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE 976.62SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE 4,503.78 City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 32 11/16/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:13:35R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 32Page -Council Check Summary 11/11/2011 -10/8/2011 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 54.51WATER UTILITY G&A POSTAGERAPID GRAPHICS & MAILING 54.51SEWER UTILITY G&A POSTAGE 54.51SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS POSTAGE 54.50STORM WATER UTILITY G&A POSTAGE 218.03 71.22POLICE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIESREGENCY OFFICE PRODUCTS LLC 35.24POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 10.64PATROLOFFICE SUPPLIES 117.10 13.06-PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH DUE TO OTHER GOVTSRHOMAR INDUSTRIES INC 202.96GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES 189.90 38.44ROUTINE MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESRIGID HITCH INC 131.45PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORY 169.89 2,207.65WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESRMR SERVICES 2,207.65 48.00INSPECTIONS G & A MECHANICALRONS MECHANICAL INC 48.00INSPECTIONS G & A PLUMBING 96.00 299.19PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYROSENBAUER MINNESOTA LLC 9.21-PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 289.98 255.00ADMINISTRATION G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSROTARY CLUB OF SLP 85.00POLICE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 177.00POLICE G & A MEETING EXPENSE 517.00 248.02TREE INJECTION TREE MAINTENANCEROWLAND, JASON 248.02 622.01STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICEROYAL CONCRETE PIPE INC 622.01 112.50GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESSALMONSON, STEVE City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 33 11/16/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:13:35R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 33Page -Council Check Summary 11/11/2011 -10/8/2011 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 112.50 71.96HUMAN RESOURCES RECOGNITIONSAM'S CLUB 75.45WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 147.41 195.82BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESSCAN AIR FILTER INC 195.82 80.75INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESSCHMIDT, KELLIE 80.75 98.28FITNESS PROGRAMS GENERAL SUPPLIESSCHRAMM, HOLLY 1,038.40FITNESS PROGRAMS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,136.68 16,501.79PE DESIGN IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDISEH 64,624.88CE INSPECTION IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 947.20SEWER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 308.00STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 82,381.87 375.00HALLOWEEN PARTY OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESSEIFERT, JIM 375.00 69.68REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESSHADE, JOHN & HIROKO 69.68 1,282.07SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESSHERWIN WILLIAMS 1,282.07 60.00ADMINISTRATION G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESSHRED-IT 11.50IT G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 28.00POLICE G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 99.50 146.85INSPECTIONS G & A BUILDINGSILVERBERG, DAVID 146.85 895.75GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICESIMPLEXGRINNELL LP 895.75 City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 34 11/16/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:13:35R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 34Page -Council Check Summary 11/11/2011 -10/8/2011 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 15,876.00WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESSIMPSON CO INC, M.E. 15,876.00 235.00INSPECTIONS G & A TRAININGSKALLET, DAVID 235.00 1,319.20EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S UNION DUESSLP ASSOC OF FIREFIGHTERS #993 1,319.20 2,144.00EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A TUITIONSMITH, ANDREA 2,144.00 1,560.00IT G & A DATACOMMUNICATIONSSPRINT 1,560.00 65.22SPLASH PAD MAINT - Oak Hill Pk GENERAL SUPPLIESSPS COMPANIES INC 61.43ARENA MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 557.33WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 683.98 1,647.67PE DESIGN IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDISRF CONSULTING GROUP INC 1,250.79CE INSPECTION IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 2,898.46 62,777.51CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU COST REIMBURSEMENT-VISIONST LOUIS PARK CONV & VISITORS 62,777.51 362.50GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESST MARTIN, CHARLES 362.50 1,908.61PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYSTANDARD SPRING 1,908.61 24,848.15-GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS BAL S RETAINED PERCENTAGESTEENBERG-WATRUD CONSTRUCTION 496,963.00GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 472,114.85 2,500.00ESCROWSDEMO / BROOKSIDE TRAFFICSTEINBRECHER COMPANIES 2,500.00 74.20OPERATIONSGENERAL SUPPLIESSTEMMER, LUKE 74.20 City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 35 11/16/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:13:35R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 35Page -Council Check Summary 11/11/2011 -10/8/2011 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 3,227.16PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYSTONEBROOKE EQUIPMENT INC 3,227.16 2,528.96PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYSUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE 2,528.96 5,262.50REILLY BUDGET GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESSUMMIT ENVIROSOLUTIONS INC 5,262.50 789.36ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL NOTICESSUN NEWSPAPERS 107.25SSD 1 G&A LEGAL NOTICES 107.25SSD 2 G&A LEGAL NOTICES 107.25SSD 3 G&A LEGAL NOTICES 107.25SSD #4 G&A LEGAL NOTICES 107.25SSD #5 G&A LEGAL NOTICES 107.25SSD #6 G&A LEGAL NOTICES 944.00SOLID WASTE G&A ADVERTISING 2,376.86 135.00WATER UTILITY G&A TRAININGSUSA 90.00SEWER UTILITY G&A TRAINING 45.00STORM WATER UTILITY G&A TRAINING 270.00 17.91SCHOOL GROUPS GENERAL SUPPLIESTARGET BANK 17.91 350.00POLICE G & A POLICE EQUIPMENTTASER INTERNATIONAL 350.00 300.00HUMAN RESOURCES SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSTCALMC 300.00 225.00MOVE-UP PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESTEA2 225.00 18.00DARE PROGRAM OPERATIONAL SUPPLIESTEE'S PLUS 18.00 36.12ADMINISTRATION G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESTELELANGUAGE INC 36.12 City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 36 11/16/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:13:35R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 36Page -Council Check Summary 11/11/2011 -10/8/2011 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 1,088.13BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICETENNANT SALES AND SERVICE CO. 1,088.13 67.00GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIESTERMINAL SUPPLY CO 67.00 97.00BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICETERMINIX INT 97.00 45.96ADMINISTRATION G & A LONG TERM DISABILITYTHE HARTFORD - PRIORITY ACCOUN 56.45HUMAN RESOURCES LONG TERM DISABILITY 16.55COMM & MARKETING G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY 42.64IT G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY 35.66ASSESSING G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY 68.33FINANCE G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY 115.75COMM DEV G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY 123.78POLICE G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY 78.55OPERATIONSLONG TERM DISABILITY 59.11INSPECTIONS G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY 44.59PUBLIC WORKS G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY 58.53ENGINEERING G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY 20.94PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY 70.58ORGANIZED REC G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY 20.94PARK MAINTENANCE G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY 17.46ENVIRONMENTAL G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY 17.46WESTWOOD G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY 18.46REC CENTER/AQUATIC PARK SAL LONG TERM DISABILITY 17.96VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A LONG TERM DISABILITY 16.97HOUSING REHAB G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY 20.94WATER UTILITY G&A LONG TERM DISABILITY 1,963.17EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A LONG TERM DISABILITY 2,930.78 36,189.45STREET CAPITAL PROJ BAL SHEET RETAINED PERCENTAGETHOMAS & SONS CONST INC 16,763.00CONSTRUCTION PAYMENTS IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 52,952.45 10,500.00ESCROWSPMC ESCROWTHOMPSON, BRAD 10,500.00 193.80INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESTHOMPSON, HOLLY City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 37 11/16/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:13:35R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 37Page -Council Check Summary 11/11/2011 -10/8/2011 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 193.80 723.94BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICETHYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR 723.94 1,116.13ADMINISTRATION G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESTIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL 1,116.13 189.28PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYTOWMASTER 189.28 30.03SEWER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIESTRACY, GREG 30.03 107.17PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYTRI STATE BOBCAT 107.17 205.44PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYTRUCK BODIES & EQUIPMENT INTL 205.44 3,000.00ESCROWSDEMO / BROOKSIDE TRAFFICTRUEBLOOD, MICHAEL & ALLISON 3,000.00 273.56GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE LANDSCAPING MATERIALSTRUGREEN - MTKA 5640 273.56 1,740.00HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESTRUSIGHT 1,740.00 352.18TREE INJECTION TREE MAINTENANCETSATSOS, GEORGE & STEPHANIE 352.18 1,000.00ESCROWSPMC ESCROWTSE, FUNG PING 1,000.00 30.00ADMINISTRATION G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTATTWIN WEST CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 30.00 233.50POLICE G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEUHL CO INC 233.50 349.39OPERATIONSOPERATIONAL SUPPLIESUNIFORMS UNLIMITED (FIRE) City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 38 11/16/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:13:35R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 38Page -Council Check Summary 11/11/2011 -10/8/2011 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 349.39 530.18SUPPORT SERVICES OPERATIONAL SUPPLIESUNIFORMS UNLIMITED (PD) 433.83SUPERVISORYOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 1,856.48PATROLOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 48.00RESERVESOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 2,868.49 300.00EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S WAGE GARNISHMENTSUNITED STATES TREASURY 300.00 618.00EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S UNITED WAYUNITED WAY OF MINNEAPOLIS AREA 618.00 150.00TRAININGTRAININGUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA REGIST 150.00 17,747.66TREE DISEASE PRIVATE CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICEUPPER CUT TREE SERVICE 17,747.66 455.00HUMAN RESOURCES RECRUITMENTUS HEALTH WORKS MEDICAL GROUP 455.00 5.67-GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTSUS IDENTIFICATION MANUAL 88.17POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 82.50 10.26WATER UTILITY G&A TELEPHONEUSA MOBILITY WIRELESS INC 10.26 87.20EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESVAIL, LORI 87.20 30,235.00-PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT B/S RETAINED PERCENTAGEVALLEY PAVING INC 604,699.94CONSTRUCTION PAYMENTS IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 574,464.94 4,987.82PARK MAINTENANCE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESVALLEY-RICH CO INC 9,087.89WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 14,075.71 224.23ENVIRONMENTAL G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CARVAUGHAN, JIM City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 39 11/16/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:13:35R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 39Page -Council Check Summary 11/11/2011 -10/8/2011 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 224.23 73.72COMMUNICATIONS/GV REIMBURSEABL TELEPHONEVERIZON WIRELESS 73.72 460.00PARK MAINTENANCE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESVIF II/PARK PLACE WEST 460.00 5,000.00ESCROWSDEMO / BROOKSIDE TRAFFICVIGER, JUSTIN & KRISTIN 5,000.00 749.19GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIESVIKING DISCOUNT BLINDS 749.19 352.69PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIESVIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 352.69 189.54PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYVILLAGE CHEVROLET 189.54 300.00ESCROWSPMC ESCROWWALTER, MITCH & JACKIE 300.00 31.06COMM DEV PLANNING G & A OFFICE SUPPLIESWALTHER, SEAN 49.50COMM DEV PLANNING G & A MEETING EXPENSE 272.93COMM DEV PLANNING G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 353.49 1,112.21SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESWASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN 5,001.24SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS MOTOR FUELS 58,787.82SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE 24,566.22SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS YARD WASTE SERVICE 30,150.00SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE 6,609.34SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL YARD WASTE SERVICE 126,226.83 7,800.00WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICEWATER CONSERVATION SERVICE INC 7,800.00 5,429.00WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEWEBER ELECTRIC 5,429.00 City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 40 11/16/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:13:35R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 40Page -Council Check Summary 11/11/2011 -10/8/2011 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 120.00SUPPORT SERVICES OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESWEST PAYMENT CENTER 120.00 182.30GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE OTHERWEST, RUTAGER 182.30 185.37WATER UTILITY G&A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CARWHITE, PERRY 185.37 158.75REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESWICK, JULIE 158.75 197.00ELECTRICAL SYSTEM MTCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICEWOLNEY ELECTRIC LLC 535.22SSD 1 G&A ELECTRIC SERVICE 553.00MUNICIPAL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 1,285.22 58.78OFF-LEASH DOG PARK GENERAL SUPPLIESWRAP CITY GRAPHICS 384.75PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 443.53 14,138.64FACILITY OPERATIONS ELECTRIC SERVICEXCEL ENERGY 22.35OPERATIONSELECTRIC SERVICE 27,527.18PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE 5,220.41PARK MAINTENANCE G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE 26.04BRICK HOUSE (1324)ELECTRIC SERVICE 61.27WW RENTAL HOUSE (1322)ELECTRIC SERVICE 492.71WESTWOOD G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE 33,362.52ENTERPRISE G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE 191.72GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 40,562.95WATER UTILITY G&A ELECTRIC SERVICE 30.46OPERATIONSELECTRIC SERVICE 1,993.12REILLY BUDGET ELECTRIC SERVICE 3,510.65SEWER UTILITY G&A ELECTRIC SERVICE 2,800.56STORM WATER UTILITY G&A ELECTRIC SERVICE 129,940.58 384.85TREE INJECTION TREE MAINTENANCEYANKTON, RICHARD 384.85 27,847.25PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYYOCUM OIL CO INC 27,847.25 City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 41 11/16/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:13:35R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 41Page -Council Check Summary 11/11/2011 -10/8/2011 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 270.28SANDING/SALTING EQUIPMENT PARTSZACKS INC 270.28 400.00NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESZANDER, LOIS 400.00 38.85WESTWOOD G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CARZEMBRYKI, MARK 38.85 896.81PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYZIEGLER INC 896.81 3,350.00-GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS BAL S RETAINED PERCENTAGEZINTL INC 67,000.00GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 63,650.00 350.36FABRICATIONOTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESZIP PRINTING 350.36 Report Totals 3,633,083.20 City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 42 Meeting Date: November 21, 2010 Agenda Item #: 6a Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance Presentation Other: EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other: Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other: TITLE: Public Hearing - 2012 Liquor License Fees. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Mayor to close public hearing. Motion to approve Resolution adopting 2012 liquor license fees for the license term March 1, 2012 through March 1, 2013 pursuant to M.S.A. Ch. 340A and section 3-59 of the St. Louis Park City Code. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the Council agree with the proposed increase in certain liquor license fees for 2012? BACKGROUND: Staff recently completed the 2011 fee study and, based on this analysis, staff is recommending minor changes to 2012 liquor license fees. State law requires that the city adopt liquor license fees at a public hearing and city ordinance permits the Council to set liquor license fees by resolution. The following is a list of the 2011 liquor license fees and proposed fees for 2012. These proposed fees have been reviewed by the Department Director and the City Manager; and reflect the limits set forth in state law and increased costs of providing administration and enforcement. Liquor License Type 2011 Fee 2012 Fee Effective 3/1/2012 Fee amount set by: Brewer Off-sale Malt Liquor $200 $200 City Brewpub Off-sale Malt Liquor $150 $200 City Off-sale 3.2 Malt Liquor $150 $200 City Off-sale Intoxicating Liquor $380 $380 STATE Off-sale Intoxicating Liquor fee per M.S. 340A.408 Subd.3(c ) $280 $280 STATE On-sale 3.2 Malt Liquor $750 $750 City On-sale Intoxicating Liquor $8,500 $8,500 City On-sale Sunday Liquor $200 $200 STATE On-sale Wine $2,000 $2,000 STATE Club (per members) 1 - 200 $300 $300 STATE 201 - 500 $500 $500 STATE 501 - 1000 $650 $650 STATE 1001 - 2000 $800 $800 STATE 2001 - 4000 $1,000 $1,000 STATE 4001 - 6000 $2,000 $2,000 STATE 6000+ $3,000 $3,000 STATE Temporary Liquor License $100/day $100/day City City Council Meeting of November 21, 2012 (Item No. 6a) Page 2 Subject: Public Hearing - 2012 Liquor License Fees Police Background Investigation Fees: 2011 Fee 2012 Fee Fee set by New License Applicant (non-refundable) 500 in-state applicant; actual costs for out-of-state applicant may be billed up to a maximum of $10,000. $500 in-state applicant; actual costs for out-of-state applicant may be billed up to a maximum of $10,000. STATE New Store Manager $500 $500 STATE On-sale license renewal per 340A.412 $500 $500 STATE FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: State law sets the limits on what fees may be charged for certain types of liquor licenses. Where there is no state restriction, the city can set the fee at an amount to reflect the cost of issuing the license and other costs directly related to the enforcement. License fees may not be used as a means of raising revenues. Off-sale 3.2 Malt Liquor and Brewpub Off-sale Malt Liquor Fee Increase Staff proposes increasing the current fee of $150 to $200 to cover the license administration and enforcement costs including compliance checks. These proposed fees are consistent with other cities and are consistent with the new $200 brewer off-sale malt liquor license fee that was adopted July 2010. Fee Comparison to Other Cities St. Louis Park liquor fees are consistent with other metro cities fees. On-sale Intoxicating License fees are always higher than other types of liquor license fees due to additional staff time for police enforcement (restaurants are open Sundays and some have 2 a.m. closing) Off-sale licenses require less police staff time due to the fact that alcohol is not consumed on the premises and there are less hours of operation. Below is a comparison of other cities On-sale Intoxicating License yearly fees: Woodbury $ 10,200 Bloomington 9,600 Edina 8,755 Eden Prairie 8,750 Minnetonka 8,600 St. Louis Park 8,500 Plymouth 8,240 Maple Grove 8,000 Golden Valley 8,000 Eagan 7,300 VISION CONSIDERATION: None at this time. Attachments: 2011 Liquor License Establishment by License Type Resolution Prepared by: Nancy Stroth, City Clerk Reviewed by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of November 21, 2012 (Item No. 6a) Page 3 Subject: Public Hearing - 2012 Liquor License Fees 2011 Liquor License Establishments License Types License Establishment Brewer Off-sale Brewpub Off-sale 3.2 Off-sale 3.2 On-sale Intox On-sale Sunday On-sale Intox Off-sale Wine On-sale Club On-sale License Issued by: City City City City City City State State State American Legion-Frank L 200 500 Applebee's Grill Bar 8500 200 Best of India 750 2000 Bunny’s 8500 200 Byerly’s St. Louis Park 8500 200 Byerly’s Wine & Spirits 380 Cedar Lake Wine & Spirits 380 Chili’s Southwest Grill 8500 200 Chipotle Mexican Grill 750 2000 Cooper Irish Pub 8500 200 Costco Wholesale #377 380 Crave 8500 200 Cub Foods Knollwood 150 Four Firkins 380 Doubletree Park Place 8500 200 Grand City Buffet Inc 750 2000 Granite City Food & Brew 150 8500 200 Homewood Suites 750 Jennings’ Liquor Store 380 Kerasotes Theatres 8500 200 Knollwood Liquor 380 Liquor Barrel, Inc. 380 Little Szechuan 8500 200 Marriott Mpls West 8500 200 McCoy’s Public House 8500 200 Mill Valley Kitchen 8500 200 Minneapolis Golf Club 200 500 Noodle & Company 750 2000 Olive Garden #1424 8500 200 Park Tavern Lounge 8500 200 Pei Wei Asian Diner 750 2000 Rainbow Foods 150 380 Rojo Mexican Grill 8500 200 Sam’s Club #6318 150 380 Soprano 8500 200 Steel Toe Brewing 200 St. Louis Park Liquors 380 St. Louis Park Woodfire Grill 8500 200 Target Corporation 150 Taste of India 750 2000 Texas-Tonka Liquors 380 Texa-Tonka Lanes 8500 200 TGI Friday’s 8500 200 Thanh Do 750 2000 Toby Keith I Love this Bar 8500 200 Trader Joe’s 380 Vescio's 750 2000 Vintage Wine & Spiritz 380 Westwood Liquors 380 Wok in the Park 750 2000 Yangtze River Rest. 8500 200 Yum, Inc. 750 2000 TOTALS 200 150 600 8,250 187,000 4,800 5,320 20,000 1,000 City Council Meeting of November 21, 2012 (Item No. 6a) Page 4 Subject: Public Hearing - 2012 Liquor License Fees RESOLUTION NO. 11-____ RESOLUTION ADOPTING 2012 LIQUOR LICENSE FEES FOR THE LICENSE TERM MARCH 1, 2012 – MARCH 1, 2013 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park as follows: WHEREAS, the St. Louis Park City Code Section 3-59 authorizes the City Council to establish annual fees for liquor licenses by resolution in amounts no greater that those set forth in M.S.A. Chapter 340A; and WHEREAS, it is necessary for the city to maintain fees in an amount necessary to cover the cost of administration and enforcement of regulating liquor in the city; and WHEREAS, fees called for within the Section 3-59 of the City Code and Minnesota State Statute Chapter 340A are hereby set by this resolution for the 2012 license term effective March 1, 2012 through March 1, 2013; and NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, fees for 2012 liquor licenses are hereby adopted as follows: Liquor License Type: 2012 Fee Effective 3/1/2012 Brewer Off-sale Malt Liquor $200 Brewpub Off-sale Malt Liquor $200 Off-sale 3.2 Malt Liquor $200 Off-sale Intoxicating Liquor $380 Off-sale Intoxicating Liquor fee per M.S. 340A.408 Subd.3(c ) $280 On-sale 3.2 Malt Liquor $750 On-sale Intoxicating Liquor $8,500 On-sale Sunday Liquor $200 On-sale Wine $2,000 Club (per # members) 1 - 200 $300 201 - 500 $500 501 - 1000 $650 1001 - 2000 $800 2001 - 4000 $1,000 4001 - 6000 $2,000 6000+ $3,000 Temporary On-sale Liquor $100/day City Council Meeting of November 21, 2012 (Item No. 6a) Page 5 Subject: Public Hearing - 2012 Liquor License Fees Background Investigation Fee New License Applicant (non-refundable) $500 in-state applicant; actual costs for out-of- state applicant may be billed up to a maximum of $10,000. New Store Manager $500 On-sale license renewal per 340A.412 Subd. 2 $500 Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council November 21, 2011 City Manager Mayor Attest: City Clerk Meeting Date: November 21, 2011 Agenda Item #: 6b Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance Presentation Other: EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other: Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other: TITLE: Public Hearing on Greensboro Condominium Association’s Housing Improvement Area (HIA). RECOMMENDED ACTION: Mayor to open Public Hearing, take testimony, and then close the Public Hearing. • Motion to Adopt Resolution approving a housing improvement fee for the Greensboro Condominium Association Housing Improvement Area pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 428A.11 to 428A.21. • Motion to Adopt First Reading of an ordinance establishing the Greensboro Condominium Association Housing Improvement Area pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 428A.11 to 428A.21 and to set Second Reading for December 5, 2011. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish to move forward with the creation of a Housing Improvement Area for the Greensboro Condominium Association? The City is authorized by the state to establish HIAs as a finance tool for private housing improvements. An HIA is a defined area within a city where housing improvements are made and the cost of the improvements are paid in whole or in part from fees imposed on the properties within the area. The City adopted an HIA policy in 2001, and has established five HIA’s. The Greensboro Condominium HIA proposal meets the intent of city policy. In the 2009 session, the state legislature extended the HIA statute for another three years. BACKGROUND: At the October 24, 2011 study session the Council received a report on the Greensboro Condominium Association’s HIA proposal and request for a Public Hearing. Petitions Submitted In October 2011, the Association submitted signed petitions from a majority of owners requesting the Council schedule a public hearing to establish the HIA and impose fees. According to state statue, cities may only establish an HIA when 50% or more of the Association owners petition the city to do so. As of November 14, 2011, petitions have been received from 56%, or 146 of the 260 owners – one of these owners has since submitted a written objection. Objections/Veto Power While a majority of owners support the improvements and city loan, there is a minority that opposes the improvements and loan; nine owners have submitted written objections to the HIA. It is anticipated that some or all of these owners will request to speak at the public hearing. The HIA statute provides that owners may file a written objection with the city clerk prior to or during the public hearing. It also provides a veto period following adoption of the ordinance. At that time if 45% or more of the owners file a written objection to the ordinance – the ordinance does not become effective. The issues of owners objecting to the HIA are discussed in the “Homeowners Risks and Issues” section of this report. City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 6b) Page 2 Subject: Public Hearing on Greensboro Condominium Association’s Housing Improvement Area (HIA) Funding Staff is recommending that the HIA loan be funded using a combination of bonds and internal funding. This hybrid approach is based on the city’s experience gained from the five established HIAs, and Ehlers and Associates recommendations. The use of bonds will limit the amount of city reserve funds that are tied up for a twenty year period and will ensure that city has sufficient dollars available for other more immediate needs. The use of internal funds will earn interest income for the city and decrease the cost of issuing bonds for the owners. It will also allow owners the ability to pay-off the balance of their fee in the future. A. Association Information Greensboro Square Condominiums and Townhomes are located at the Southeast corner of Louisiana Ave South and West Franklin Ave. It is somewhat unique in that the Association is composed of both townhomes and condominiums. There are 15 buildings with a total of 260 units: - 58 three BR townhomes; - 38 two BR townhomes; - 164 one & two BR condominium apartments. • It was built in 1970 and apartments converted to condos in 1978. • The 2011 median estimated market value (EMV) for the condos is $72,000 and the range of EMV is $66,000-$91,900. • The 2011 median EMV for the townhomes is $151,500, and units range from $128,000 - 157,000. • 80% of the units are owner occupied. B. History In 2008, the Association first expressed interest in learning about the HIA process to possibly assist with financing garage repairs. The Association conducted a physical needs assessment and financial plan review known as a Reserve Study to provide a background for making decisions related to property improvements. In December 2008 the Board decided not to pursue an HIA in part due to the uncertainty of the 2008 market upheaval. In September 2010, the Board and property management company, Gassen Property Management, discussed possible financial assistance with staff. They expressed that ongoing deferred maintenance needed to be addressed and that membership support for some level of improvements existed. The association formed a renovation committee to evaluate the condition of buildings and grounds, determine a scope of work and to explore options to finance the work. On August 12, 2011 the Association submitted the preliminary application for the HIA. C. Analysis of Application The following analysis describes how the current proposal meets the City’s HIA policy and intentions of the statute. The Association’s preliminary application has been reviewed by staff. The City’s financial advisor, Ehlers and Associates and legal counsel, Kennedy and Graven, have reviewed the HIA financing to ensure it is within applicable state statute and financial requirements. City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 6b) Page 3 Subject: Public Hearing on Greensboro Condominium Association’s Housing Improvement Area (HIA) 1. The HIA meets City goals. The proposed improvements meet the City goals in that they will preserve and upgrade the existing housing stock in a neighborhood and increase energy efficiency of the buildings with addition of a building wrap, hardi-board siding to replace failed siding, and improved flashing and caulking of the buildings. The use of the HIA to assist with property improvements is consistent with VISION and the City Council’s adopted Strategic Direction to preserve existing housing stock and affordable ownership opportunities. 2. Unit market values meet guideline. The units median estimated market values (EMV) of $72,000 for condos and $151,500 for townhomes are within policy guidelines of median EMVs less than or equal to MN Housing’s First Time Home Buyers limit of $298,000 in 2011. 3. The Association contracted with a third party to conduct a reserve study. In September of 2008, the Association had a reserve study conducted by Reserve Advisors, Inc. This study was updated in summer 2011. The study includes a physical needs assessment, thirty year capital improvement plan and a financial analysis of the existing and projected financial situation. The updated reserve study takes into account a loan to fund the proposed HIA project. The funding plan indicates that projected association fee increases will meet operational needs and the Association will be capable of funding future improvements with their reserves. 4. Project Costs are reasonable and eligible for use of the HIA. To ensure the proposed scope and cost was the most responsible possible, the Association’s renovation committee hired consultants to assist with evaluating the needed repairs. These consultants include an Owner’s Rep and Construction Manager; structural and civil engineers, surveyor and architects. The renovation committee has been meeting weekly since February, 2011, refining the scope of work and budget. The proposed construction costs are estimated at $3,262,680 and include the following basic improvements which are eligible uses for the HIA and are noted in Table 1. a. Site improvements required due to poor soil conditions and age: repair & replace sanitary sewer, storm water and water mains, grading corrections, complete asphalt, curb and gutter replacement, sidewalk and stoop repair. b. Exterior building repair: hardi-board siding and trim replacement to address failed siding, balcony repair, roof repairs and replacement of condo common area windows and entry doors. c. Repair of all exterior garages. Residents voted on engineer designed alternatives to address the exterior garages and opted to repair rather than replace the garages as a means to keep costs affordable. d. Replacement of unit windows will NOT be included in the project. Residents desiring unit window replacement may pay to have it done in coordination with HIA work, but are not required to. City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 6b) Page 4 Subject: Public Hearing on Greensboro Condominium Association’s Housing Improvement Area (HIA) Table 1. Greensboro – Exterior Renovation Scope and Budget Site Work Budget Complete asphalt replacement, grade repairs, new concrete curb and gutter $692,622 Repair water main based on Bonestroo recommendations $54,307 Repair sanitary sewer based on Bonestroo recommendations $64,600 Repair storm sewer based on Bonestroo recommendations $154,965 Total Site Work $ 966,494 Resident Buildings Siding - Remove and replace with new flux mansard design $852,832 New fronts (windows/doors) at condos, front, back, and side entries $ 92,000 Repair balconies as needed and repaint all balconies $185,200 Repair voids at slabs and patios, cable rerouting $ 28,000 Total Resident Buildings $ 1,158,032 Garages Repairs Brick removal and siding install $ 139,597 Wall and roof framing repairs per Erickson Roed recommendations $ 217,965 Perimeter drain tile $11,424 New roof $276,924 New garage doors as required $79,950 Garage lockers $ 8,400 Garage contingency $108,879 Total Garages Repairs $843,139 Permits and Contingency Permits $ 25,626 Contingency $269,389 Total Permits & Contingency $295,015 Subtotal Construction Costs $ 3,262,680 Table 2. shows the total project cost, which is estimated to be $3,835,000. The total project costs includes the cost of issuing bonds, capitalized interest, the city’s administrative fee, construction management, architectural and engineering fees, etc. The costs reflect the complexity of repairs related to soil conditions in this area of town and the need to find solutions that will have lasting value. City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 6b) Page 5 Subject: Public Hearing on Greensboro Condominium Association’s Housing Improvement Area (HIA) Table 2. Greensboro Total Project Costs Bond Issuance and City Costs Budget Underwriter's Discount for Bond Issuance $47,938 Cost of Issuance (Bond Counsel, Financial Advisor) $43,000 Rounding for Bond Issuance $688 Capitalized Interest $143,019 City Soft Costs (City Admin Fee, Legal & Financial Advisor) $29,675 Total Bond Issuance and City Fees $264,320 Consultant Soft Costs Budget Owner's Rep/Construction Manager $155,000 Architect $65,000 Structural and Civil Engineers $ 57,500 Surveying $12,000 Enclosure/Siding/Windows 3rd Party Inspection/Siding $7,500 Environmental Hygienist $5,000 Legal and Accounting $6,000 Total Soft Costs $ 308,000 Subtotal Construction Costs $ 3,262,680 Total Project Costs $ 3,835,000 5. The association’s process, timeline and communication meet and exceed statutory requirements. The Association’s communication regarding the HIA began in 2008, and re-emerged in 2010. The Association has followed an extensive process in ensuring owners are and have been aware of the status of the proposed project, and that residents have been afforded opportunities to provide input. On October 12 and October 21, the City Clerk received signed petitions from 146 Greensboro owners requesting the Council schedule a public hearing to establish the HIA and impose fee. Petitions have been signed by 56% of the owners. City policy and State Statute requires that 50% of the owners sign petitions. Prior to submitting the petitions the association completed the following steps which meet statutory requirements. a. In November 2010, the Association held a full membership meeting to discuss property improvements and options to fund the improvements. The meeting was videotaped for the Association’s use as well as being aired on the City’s cable channel. b. In Feb 2011, the Association hired an owners’ rep to manage the three phases of the renovation project; determining the scope, pre-construction phase and construction phase. The association hired Blumenthal Architect, Bonestroo Surveying/Civil Engineering and Roed Erickson Structural engineering to determine physical conditions and propose solutions. c. The Association’s website: www.greensborosquare.com devoted one section to the renovation project known as the Greensboro Extreme Makeover, providing ongoing status updates, meeting minutes and solicited input from residents. City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 6b) Page 6 Subject: Public Hearing on Greensboro Condominium Association’s Housing Improvement Area (HIA) d. From February through September 2011, the renovation committee met almost weekly to review findings, communicate status with residents and take input. e. On April 28, 2011 the Association conducted a full membership meeting to inform owners of the progress of the project. f. The committee conducted two separate surveys of owners to garner input regarding garage improvements and architectural design for the exterior siding project g. On September 20, 2011 the Association conducted a full membership meeting to inform owners of the final proposed project. 6. The HIA financing is necessary for this project. The Greensboro Association applied for credit from Signature Bank and Klein Bank. Their requests were denied based on insufficient income for the amount of credit requested, the type of collateral was insufficient and the exposure amount was considered too large. The HIA is designed to be a last resort finance tool for associations. It is also designed to address obstacles some associations confront when applying for financing – generally associations are limited by their lack of collateral, so they need to fund larger projects through short term assessments to owners. The HIA provides affordable payment options, averaging approximately $113 per month per unit. This payment will still allow association fees to increase gradually to ensure adequate funds for operation and long term maintenance. 7. Fees and Loan Term. The average fee per unit will be $14,762 with an annual average cost per unit of $1,354 including interest, payable over 20 years. The 20 year term provides an affordable annual fee for owners. The range of the unit fees is from $6,016 to $25,294. Ehlers and Associates have suggested estimating a conservative interest rate of 6.03%, which may be decreased when bonds are actually sold and the city’s interest rate is known. Table 3. outlines the loan terms. Table 3. Loan Terms Total Loan Amount $3,835,000 Term (years) 20 Interest Rate 6.03% Average Annual Debt Service $335,167 Required Coverage (105%) $351,925 Total Units 260 Cost/Unit – Annual (Average) $1,354 Cost/Unit - Monthly (Average) $113 Average Assessment - Per/Unit if prepaid $14,762 If the HIA is approved, owners not prepaying would begin making payments with their 2013 real estate tax payments. Using a combination of bonds and an internal loan allows owners flexibility in prepaying without interest or paying-off the loan in the future. City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 6b) Page 7 Subject: Public Hearing on Greensboro Condominium Association’s Housing Improvement Area (HIA) The percentage of prepayments for the existing HIAs has been: forty percent for the Cedar Trails HIA; twenty-five percent for Sungate One; sixteen percent for Wolfe Lake; and seven percent for the Westmoreland Hills HIA and twenty-one percent for the Sunset Ridge HIA. Preliminary estimates based on completed owner questionnaires indicate that eighteen percent of the owners are considering pre-paying the fee if the Greensboro HIA is approved. 8. Association's desired method of fee imposition The 2010 Legislature enacted legislation amending the HIA State Statute. It requires that if the fee is imposed “on a basis other than the tax capacity or square footage of the housing unit, the Council must make a finding that the alternative basis for the fee is more fair and reasonable.” Previous St. Louis Park HIAs used two methods of imposing fees: 1) the percentage of ownership, which was based on square footage of housing units, and 2) costs of limited common area improvements assigned to specific units. The Greensboro Association is seeking to base fees on a three-tiered system, which is consistent with the formula they use to calculate association dues, and considered to be a fair method. a. All common area costs including site work, financing, and soft costs would be assessed to each unit based on the percentage of common area ownership which is based on unit square footage. b. All common building areas improvements would be assessed to each unit based on the percentage of building common area ownership, which is based on unit square footage. c. Limited common areas include garages, lockers and balconies. These costs would be assessed to each unit based on the cost of improvements associated with that unit. If a unit has no garage, the owner would not pay for other units’ garage improvements. The same would hold true with lockers and balconies. The attached memo drafted by Kennedy & Graven, describes the proposed fee and provides a factual basis for the Council's use in making its required findings that the proposed three tiered system is more fair and reasonable and meets statutory requirements. D. Homeowner risks and issues 1. Residents opposing the HIA have expressed concern about the costs and necessity of improvements and the cost of borrowing funds. They have stated that: a. Replacing the failed siding is cosmetic and unnecessary. b. Garage repairs are not critical and too expensive. c. They would prefer the repairs be made incrementally as reserve funds are available. The Association’s board, renovation committee which met weekly, and consultants have discussed the concerns raised by HIA opponents. They have concluded that proposed scope of work is necessary to needed repairs, and that timeliness of the repairs will prevent further costly emergency piecemeal repairs. City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 6b) Page 8 Subject: Public Hearing on Greensboro Condominium Association’s Housing Improvement Area (HIA) 2. Residents opposing the HIA have expressed concern that the petition process, which is mandated and guided by the State, is confusing for owners. They have also expressed concern about the integrity of the petition count. The Association held three full membership meetings to inform owners of the proposed scope of work, cost and process, in addition to open weekly renovation committee meetings. City staff attended membership meetings to explain and describe the city’s role and explain the petition process. Staff has been available and has met with and taken calls from residents requesting information about the process. Additionally, the Greensboro website has provided an ongoing update of the process. The city’s attorney, Kennedy and Graven drafted the petition according to statute, along with an information piece explaining the process and fees. The Association’s attorney mailed and collected the petitions. The signed petitions were then submitted to the City Clerk’s office. The Clerk’s office compared the owners name on each petition with the Hennepin County Property database. Two owners reviewed and counted each petition with staff to confirm the number of petitions submitted was 146. During this verification it was noted that one owner both submitted a petition and an objection. 3. Financial burden to owners. The terms of the HIA loan (relatively low interest rate and long term) provides modest income homeowners an affordable means to pay for the improvements. The following measures have been taken to assist owners that are burdened by the proposed fee: a. The special assessment hardship deferral for low income seniors and low income disabled owners allows the fee, including interest, to be deferred until the owner occupant sells or transfers title. A survey was sent to all owners and twelve have indicated they may be eligible for the hardship deferral. b. Community Action Partnership of Suburban Hennepin (CAPHS) provides financial counseling at no cost to St. Louis Park residents and owners have received information to access this service. c. There are currently nine units in foreclosure – the bank and investor owners of these units will be obligated to pay the fee, just as they are obligated to pay real estate taxes on the properties. d. By funding the HIA with a combination of bonds and internal funding, owners will have more flexibility in paying off the assessment in the future. E. City Issues 1. How best to fund HIA loans. The City has alternative mechanisms to fund the HIA improvements: while the HIA law anticipates cities using their bonding authority to fund HIA loans, cities can use their own funds. For the HIAs that the city has previously created internal funds have been used for the smaller projects. These projects were $1,400,000 or less and were funded from the City’s Development Fund or the Housing Rehab Fund. One HIA, Sunset Ridge, was too large ($3.9M) to fund internally and was funded through bonds. City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 6b) Page 9 Subject: Public Hearing on Greensboro Condominium Association’s Housing Improvement Area (HIA) Staff, with assistance from Ehlers & Associates, recommends using a combination of internal funds (approximately $1,100,000), and issuing bonds for the remaining amount (approximately $2,700,000) of the project. This hybrid funding combination addresses both the city’s and owners' interests: a. Use of bonds limits the amount of city’s reserve funds that will be tied up for a twenty year period. b. Use of internal funds generates interest income for the city. c. Reducing the amount of bonds will slightly decrease the cost of issuance, which in turn decreases the total finance cost for residents. d. The use of internal funds allows owners the flexibility to pay off the assessment in the future which provides flexibility when selling their unit. 2. How the City is protected from financial risk. a. Repayment of the loan is made through owner’s real estate tax payments. b. In foreclosure events, tax liabilities including special assessments, must be paid by any party that purchases the unit. In this arena, HIA fees have been treated the same as special assessments. c. There is 105% debt coverage. d. The development agreement allows the City to obtain assignment of association’s assets. The agreement also can require associations to pay on behalf of delinquent members if payments are not made. e. The delinquency rate of existing HIA fees is low and consistent with the citywide property tax delinquency rate of less than 1%. f. The association, as required by statute, conducted a reserve study of capital needs and long term financials. The financial plan outlines the long term feasibility of financing future improvements. g. The Development Agreement provides additional contractual conditions to ensure financial stability of associations. The agreement will require that the association: • Use professional property management. • Submit annual audits and update financial plans to demonstrate capability for ongoing maintenance & operations. • Demonstrate that monthly association dues are sufficient to build reserves to a sustainable level or increase monthly dues to a sufficient level. 3. On-going maintenance of townhomes and condos a critical community need. There are roughly 2700 townhome and condo units in St. Louis Park. The majority of them are over 25 years old. For the strength of our neighborhoods and the whole community, it is important that these homes be well maintained. Deteriorating housing would be a huge risk for the community if allowed to happen. In spring of 2009, the Inspection Department conducted a visual review of all condominium and townhome complexes in St. Louis Park to determine the extent of potential complexes in need of exterior maintenance. A handful of complexes were identified as needing repair including Westmoreland Hills and Sunset Ridge which have established HIAs, and City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 6b) Page 10 Subject: Public Hearing on Greensboro Condominium Association’s Housing Improvement Area (HIA) completed improvements. The Greensboro Square complex has been on the City’s radar as an association with building issues related to poor soil conditions and deferred exterior maintenance. The other association known to be interested in applying for a loan is Westwood Hill Villas at 2200 Nevada Ave, with 60 units and a very preliminary estimated construction cost of $1,000,000. NEXT STEPS: The next steps follow the Public Hearing. November 21, 2011 Public Hearing December 5, 2011 2nd Reading of HIA Ordinance January 19, 2012 Veto Period Ends Effective Date of Ordinance February 16, 2012 Prepayment Period Ends Hardship Deferment Application Deadline March 2012 Sale of Bonds and Construction Starts 2013 Fee will appear on property tax statements beginning 2013 BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The project costs, legal and financial advisor fees incurred by the city are included in the project budget. The city would receive an administrative fee of one-half of one percent of the project cost, or $19,175. The combination of funding, bonds and internal funds will alleviate the concern that city reserve funds be tied up for a twenty year period and will ensure that city has sufficient dollars available for other more immediate needs. It will also allow the city to generate interest income. VISION CONSIDERATION: This project is consistent with VISION’s commitment to ensure a diversity of well-maintained housing and affordable single-family home ownership. Attachments: 1. Resolution Approving a Housing Improvement Fee for the Greensboro Condominium Association HIA 2. Ordinance Establishing the Greensboro Condominium Association Improvement Area 3. Greensboro HIA Memo 4. Photos 5. Summary of Established HIAs 6. HIA Policy Prepared by: Kathy Larsen, Housing Programs Coordinator Reviewed by: Kevin Locke, Director of Community Development Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager RESOLUTION NO. 11-____ RESOLUTION APPROVING A HOUSING IMPROVEMENT FEE FOR THE GREENSBORO CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION HOUSING IMPROVEMENT AREA PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES, SECTIONS 428A.11 to 428A.21 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park as follows: Section 1. Recitals. 1.01. The City of St. Louis Park ("City") is authorized under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 428A.11 to 428A.21 (the "Act") to establish by ordinance a housing improvement area within which housing improvements are made or constructed and the costs of the improvements are paid in whole or in part from fees imposed within the area. 1.02. The St. Louis Park City Council (“Council”) adopted a Housing Improvement Area policy on July 16, 2001. 1.03. By Ordinance No. _________ adopted on November 21, 2011 (the "Enabling Ordinance"), the Council has established the Greensboro Condominium Owners Association Housing Improvement Area in order to facilitate certain improvements to property known as the "Greensboro Condominium Owners Association", all in accordance with the Housing Improvement Area policy. 1.04. In accordance with Section 428A.12 of the Act, owners of at least 50 percent of the housing units within the Greensboro Condominium Owners Association Housing Improvement Area have filed a petition with the City Clerk requesting a public hearing regarding imposition of a housing improvement fee for the Greensboro Condominium Owners Association Housing Improvement Area. 1.05. The Council has on November 21, 2011 conducted a public hearing, duly noticed in accordance with Section 428A.13 of the Act, regarding adoption of this resolution at which all persons, including owners of property within the Greensboro Condominium Owners Association Housing Improvement Area, were given an opportunity to be heard. 1.06. The Council finds that the Greensboro Condominium Owners Association Housing Improvement Area meets each of the approval criteria contained in the Housing Improvement Area Policy (listed as 5.01A- 5.01M), including the criterion that a majority of the condominium association owners support the project and the Housing Improvement Area financing. 1.07. Prior to the date hereof, Greensboro Condominium Owners Association (the "Condominium Association") has submitted to the City a financial plan prepared by Reserve Advisors, Inc., an independent third party acceptable to the City and the Condominium Association, that provides for the Condominium Association to finance maintenance and operation of the common elements in the Greensboro Condominium Owners Association and a long-range plan to conduct and finance capital improvements therein, all in accordance with Section 428A.14 of the Act. City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 6b) Subject: Public Hearing on Greensboro Condominium Association’s Housing Improvement Area (HIA)Page 11 1.08. For the purposes of this Resolution, the terms "Greensboro Condominium Owners Association Housing Improvement Area" and "Housing Improvements" have the meanings provided in the Enabling Ordinance. Section 2. Housing Improvement Fee Imposed. 2.01. The City hereby imposes a fee on each housing unit within the Greensboro Condominium Owners Association Housing Improvement Area (the "Housing Improvement Fee"), as specified in Exhibit A attached hereto, which Housing Improvement Fee is imposed (i) for Common Elements based on the square footage (percentage of undivided ownership) of each unit, and imposed for Limited Common Elements based on a pro rate share of the total cost of the Limited Common Elements divided among those housing units actually benefiting from improvements to said Limited Common Elements, all as prescribed in the Amended and Restated Declaration of Greensboro Condominium. 2.02. The Council hereby finds that the Housing Improvement Fee for the Common Elements is imposed on the basis of square footage of each unit, and that the basis for imposing the Housing Improvement Fee for the Limited Common Elements is more fair and equitable than a fee based on square footage or tax capacity. This finding is based on the reasoning set forth in the Memorandum to the Council from City staff dated November 11, 2011 and on file with the City Clerk, which Memorandum is incorporated herein by reference. 2.03. The owner of any housing unit in the Greensboro Condominium Owners Association Housing Improvement Area may prepay the Housing Improvement Fee in total and without interest thereon between the effective date of this resolution and February 16, 2012. The amount of the prepayment is shown under the heading Total Cost (Prepayment Amount) in Exhibit A. Partial prepayment of the Housing Improvement Fee shall not be permitted. Prepayment must be made to the City Treasurer. After expiration of the prepayment period on February 16, 2012, owners may, before November 30 of any year, prepay in whole the unpaid installment of the Total Cost, with interest thereon at the rate of 6.03% accrued to the end of the calendar year in which the Total Cost is paid. If prepayment is made after November 30, the amount prepaid must include interest through the end of the following calendar year. 2.04. If the Total Prepayment Fee is not paid between the effective date of this resolution and February 16, 2012, the Housing Improvement Fee shall be imposed as an annual fee, in the amount shown under the heading Annual Fee in Exhibit A. The Housing Improvement Fee shall be imposed in equal installments, beginning in 2013, for a period no greater than 20 years after the first installment is due and payable. The Annual Fee shall be deemed to include interest on the unpaid portion of the total Housing Improvement Fee. Interest shall begin to accrue on January 1, 2013 at an annual interest rate of 6.03 percent per annum. The Annual Fee shall be structured such that estimated collection of the Annual Fee will produce at least five percent in excess of the amount needed to meet, when due, the principal and interest payments on the Housing Improvement Fee. 2.04. Unless prepaid between the effective date of this resolution and February 16, 2012, the Housing Improvement Fee shall be payable at the same time and in the same manner as provided for payment and collection of ad valorem taxes, as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Sections 428A.15 and 428A.05. As set forth therein, the Housing Improvement Fee is not included in the calculation of levies or limits on levies imposed under any law or charter. City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 6b) Subject: Public Hearing on Greensboro Condominium Association’s Housing Improvement Area (HIA)Page 12 2.05 A de minimis fee may be imposed by Hennepin County for services in connection to administration required in order for the fee to be made payable at the same time and in the same manner as provided for payment and collection of ad valorem taxes. Section 3. Notice of Right to File Objections. 3.01. Within five days after the adoption of this Resolution, the City Clerk is authorized and directed to mail to the owner of each housing unit in the Greensboro Condominium Owners Association Housing Improvement Area: a summary of this Resolution; notice that owners subject to the Housing Improvement Fee have a right to veto this Resolution if owners of at least 45 percent of the housing units within the Greensboro Condominium Owners Association Housing Improvement Area file a written objection with the City Clerk before the effective date of this Resolution; and notice that a copy of this Resolution is on file with the City Clerk for public inspection. Section 4. Effective Date. 4.01. This Resolution shall be effective 45 days after adoption hereof. Section 5. Filing of Housing Improvement Fee. 5.01. The City Clerk shall file a certified copy of this resolution together with a final update of Exhibit A hereto to the Hennepin County Director of Taxation to be recorded on the property tax lists of the county for taxes payable in 2013 and thereafter. Approved by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park this 21st day of November, 2011. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council November 21, 2011 City Manager Mayor Attest: City Clerk City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 6b) Subject: Public Hearing on Greensboro Condominium Association’s Housing Improvement Area (HIA)Page 13 City of St. Louis ParkHousing Improvement Area - Greensboro Assessment AllocationBuilding Type Unit #Building Unit #Building #Ownership PercentageTotal Common Cost Ownership Percentage Total Common Cost Garage Locker BalconyTotal Limited Common Cost1,295,869.83$               356,085.70$              6,786.49$ 36.19$ 400.00$ 572,319.00$ 1101 7414 0.0023161093,001.38$                       0.0049977031,779.61$                   136.19$                            4,817.18$                          1,325.55$                    6,142.73$                      563.70$                    11,273.95$                      2102 7414 0.0023161093,001.38$                       0.0049977031,779.61$                   136.19$                            4,817.18$                          1,325.55$                    6,142.73$                      563.70$                    11,273.95$                      3103 7414 0.0034475424,467.57$                       0.0074391082,648.96$                   16,786.49$                      13,903.02$                       1,973.09$                    15,876.11$                    1,456.90$                 29,137.95$                      4104 7414 0.0036472064,726.30$                       0.0078699452,802.37$                   16,786.49$                      14,315.17$                       2,087.37$                    16,402.54$                    1,505.21$                 30,104.11$                      5105 7414 0.0024492183,173.87$                       0.0052849271,881.89$                   136.19$                            5,091.94$                          1,401.73$                    6,493.68$                      595.90$                    11,918.06$                      6106 7414 0.0025823293,346.36$                       0.0055721511,984.16$                   16,786.49$                      12,117.02$                       1,477.92$                    13,594.93$                    1,247.56$                 24,951.23$                      7107 7414 0.0024492183,173.87$                       0.0052849271,881.89$                   136.19$                            5,091.94$                          1,401.73$                    6,493.68$                      595.90$                    11,918.06$                      8108 7414 0.0025823293,346.36$                       0.0055721511,984.16$                   16,786.49$                      12,117.02$                       1,477.92$                    13,594.93$                    1,247.56$                 24,951.23$                      9109 7414 0.0024492183,173.87$                       0.0052849271,881.89$                   136.19$                            5,091.94$                          1,401.73$                    6,493.68$                      595.90$                    11,918.06$                      10110 7414 0.0035806524,640.06$                       0.0077263332,751.24$                   16,786.49$                      14,177.79$                       2,049.28$                    16,227.06$                    1,489.10$                 29,782.06$                      11111 7414 0.0036472064,726.30$                       0.0078699452,802.37$                   16,786.49$                      14,315.17$                       2,087.37$                    16,402.54$                    1,505.21$                 30,104.11$                      12112 7414 0.0023161093,001.38$                       0.0049977031,779.61$                   136.19$                            4,817.18$                          1,325.55$                    6,142.73$                      563.70$                    11,273.95$                      13114 7414 0.0023161093,001.38$                       0.0049977031,779.61$                   136.19$                            4,817.18$                          1,325.55$                    6,142.73$                      563.70$                    11,273.95$                      14201 7414 0.0025157733,260.11$                       0.0054285391,933.03$                   11436.19$                         5,629.33$                          1,439.82$                    7,069.15$                      648.71$                    12,974.25$                      15202 7414 0.0026488833,432.61$                       0.0057157622,035.30$                   117,186.49$                      12,654.40$                       1,516.01$                    14,170.41$                    1,300.37$                 26,007.41$                      16203 7414 0.0036472064,726.30$                       0.0078699452,802.37$                   117,186.49$                      14,715.17$                       2,087.37$                    16,802.54$                    1,541.91$                 30,838.25$                      17204 7414 0.003713764,812.55$                       0.0080135562,853.51$                   117,186.49$                      14,852.55$                       2,125.46$                    16,978.01$                    1,558.01$                 31,160.30$                      18205 7414 0.0025157733,260.11$                       0.0054285391,933.03$                   11436.19$                         5,629.33$                          1,439.82$                    7,069.15$                      648.71$                    12,974.25$                      19206 7414 0.0026488833,432.61$                       0.0057157622,035.30$                   117,186.49$                      12,654.40$                       1,516.01$                    14,170.41$                    1,300.37$                 26,007.41$                      20207 7414 0.0025157733,260.11$                       0.0054285341,933.02$                   11436.19$                         5,629.33$                          1,439.82$                    7,069.15$                      648.71$                    12,974.25$                      21208 7414 0.0025157733,260.11$                       0.0054285341,933.02$                   11436.19$                         5,629.33$                          1,439.82$                    7,069.15$                      648.71$                    12,974.25$                      22209 7414 0.0026488833,432.61$                       0.0057157622,035.30$                   117,186.49$                      12,654.40$                       1,516.01$                    14,170.41$                    1,300.37$                 26,007.41$                      23210 7414 0.0036472064,726.30$                       0.0078699452,802.37$                   117,186.49$                      14,715.17$                       2,087.37$                    16,802.54$                    1,541.91$                 30,838.25$                      24211 7414 0.003713764,812.55$                       0.0080135562,853.51$                   117,186.49$                      14,852.55$                       2,125.46$                    16,978.01$                    1,558.01$                 31,160.30$                      25212 7414 0.0025157733,260.11$                       0.0054285391,933.03$                   11436.19$                         5,629.33$                          1,439.82$                    7,069.15$                      648.71$                    12,974.25$                      26214 7414 0.0025157733,260.11$                       0.0054285391,933.03$                   11436.19$                         5,629.33$                          1,439.82$                    7,069.15$                      648.71$                    12,974.25$                      27215 7414 0.0021164452,742.64$                       0.0045668661,626.20$                   11436.19$                         4,805.02$                          1,211.28$                    6,016.30$                      552.10$                    11,041.92$                      28301 7414 0.0026488833,432.61$                       0.0057157622,035.30$                   117,186.49$                      12,654.40$                       1,516.01$                    14,170.41$                    1,300.37$                 26,007.41$                      29302 7414 0.0025157733,260.11$                       0.0054285391,933.03$                   11436.19$                         5,629.33$                          1,439.82$                    7,069.15$                      648.71$                    12,974.25$                      30303 7414 0.0036472064,726.30$                       0.0078699452,802.37$                   117,186.49$                      14,715.17$                       2,087.37$                    16,802.54$                    1,541.91$                 30,838.25$                      31304 7414 0.003713764,812.55$                       0.0080135562,853.51$                   117,186.49$                      14,852.55$                       2,125.46$                    16,978.01$                    1,558.01$                 31,160.30$                      32305 7414 0.0025157733,260.11$                       0.0054285391,933.03$                   11436.19$                         5,629.33$                          1,439.82$                    7,069.15$                      648.71$                    12,974.25$                      33306 7414 0.0025157733,260.11$                       0.0054285391,933.03$                   11436.19$                         5,629.33$                          1,439.82$                    7,069.15$                      648.71$                    12,974.25$                      34307 7414 0.0021164452,742.64$                       0.0045668661,626.20$                   11436.19$                         4,805.02$                          1,211.28$                    6,016.30$                      552.10$                    11,041.92$                      35308 7414 0.0026488833,432.61$                       0.0057157622,035.30$                   117,186.49$                      12,654.40$                       1,516.01$                    14,170.41$                    1,300.37$                 26,007.41$                      36309 7414 0.0025157733,260.11$                       0.0054285391,933.03$                   11436.19$                         5,629.33$                          1,439.82$                    7,069.15$                      648.71$                    12,974.25$                      37310 7414 0.0036472064,726.30$                       0.0078699452,802.37$                   117,186.49$                      14,715.17$                       2,087.37$                    16,802.54$                    1,541.91$                 30,838.25$                      38311 7414 0.003713764,812.55$                       0.0080135562,853.51$                   117,186.49$                      14,852.55$                       2,125.46$                    16,978.01$                    1,558.01$                 31,160.30$                      39312 7414 0.0025157733,260.11$                       0.0054285391,933.03$                   11436.19$                         5,629.33$                          1,439.82$                    7,069.15$                      648.71$                    12,974.25$                      40314 7414 0.0026488833,432.61$                       0.0057157622,035.30$                   117,186.49$                      12,654.40$                       1,516.01$                    14,170.41$                    1,300.37$                 26,007.41$                      41315 7414 0.0025157733,260.11$                       0.0054285391,933.03$                   11436.19$                         5,629.33$                          1,439.82$                    7,069.15$                      648.71$                    12,974.25$                      42101 7412 0.0023161093,001.38$                       0.0049977031,779.61$                   136.19$                            4,817.18$                          1,325.55$                    6,142.73$                      563.70$                    11,273.95$                      43102 7412 0.0023161093,001.38$                       0.0049977031,779.61$                   136.19$                            4,817.18$                          1,325.55$                    6,142.73$                      563.70$                    11,273.95$                      44103 7412 0.0034475424,467.57$                       0.0074391082,648.96$                   16,786.49$                      13,903.02$                       1,973.09$                    15,876.11$                    1,456.90$                 29,137.95$                      45104 7412 0.0036472064,726.30$                       0.0078699452,802.37$                   16,786.49$                      14,315.17$                       2,087.37$                    16,402.54$                    1,505.21$                 30,104.11$                      46105 7412 0.0024492183,173.87$                       0.0052849271,881.89$                   136.19$                            5,091.94$                          1,401.73$                    6,493.68$                      595.90$                    11,918.06$                      47106 7412 0.0025823293,346.36$                       0.0055721511,984.16$                   16,786.49$                      12,117.02$                       1,477.92$                    13,594.93$                    1,247.56$                 24,951.23$                      48107 7412 0.0024492183,173.87$                       0.0052849271,881.89$                   136.19$                            5,091.94$                          1,401.73$                    6,493.68$                      595.90$                    11,918.06$                      49108 7412 0.0024492183,173.87$                       0.0052849271,881.89$                   136.19$                            5,091.94$                          1,401.73$                    6,493.68$                      595.90$                    11,918.06$                      50109 7412 0.0025823293,346.36$                       0.0055721511,984.16$                   16,786.49$                      12,117.02$                       1,477.92$                    13,594.93$                    1,247.56$                 24,951.23$                      51110 7412 0.0035806524,640.06$                       0.0077263332,751.24$                   16,786.49$                      14,177.79$                       2,049.28$                    16,227.06$                    1,489.10$                 29,782.06$                      52111 7412 0.0036472064,726.30$                       0.0078699452,802.37$                   16,786.49$                      14,315.17$                       2,087.37$                    16,402.54$                    1,505.21$                 30,104.11$                      53112 7412 0.0023161093,001.38$                       0.0049977031,779.61$                   136.19$                            4,817.18$                          1,325.55$                    6,142.73$                      563.70$                    11,273.95$                      54114 7412 0.0023161093,001.38$                       0.0049977031,779.61$                   136.19$                            4,817.18$                          1,325.55$                    6,142.73$                      563.70$                    11,273.95$                      55215 7412 0.0021164452,742.64$                       0.0045668661,626.20$                   11436.19$                         4,805.02$                          1,211.28$                    6,016.30$                      552.10$                    11,041.92$                      56 201 74120.0026488833,432.61$                       0.0057157622,035.30$                   117,186.49$                      12,654.40$                       1,516.01$                    14,170.41$                    1,300.37$                 26,007.41$                      57 202 74120.0025157733,260.11$                       0.0054285391,933.03$                   11436.19$                         5,629.33$                          1,439.82$                    7,069.15$                      648.71$                    12,974.25$                      58 203 74120.0036472064,726.30$                       0.0078699452,802.37$                   117,186.49$                      14,715.17$                       2,087.37$                    16,802.54$                    1,541.91$                 30,838.25$                      59 204 74120.003713764,812.55$                       0.0080135562,853.51$                   117,186.49$                      14,852.55$                       2,125.46$                    16,978.01$                    1,558.01$                 31,160.30$                      60 205 74120.0025157733,260.11$                       0.0054285391,933.03$                   11436.19$                         5,629.33$                          1,439.82$                    7,069.15$                      648.71$                    12,974.25$                      61 206 74120.0026488833,432.61$                       0.0057157622,035.30$                   117,186.49$                      12,654.40$                       1,516.01$                    14,170.41$                    1,300.37$                 26,007.41$                      62 207 74120.0025157733,260.11$                       0.0054285391,933.03$                   11436.19$                         5,629.33$                          1,439.82$                    7,069.15$                      648.71$                    12,974.25$                      63 208 74120.0025157733,260.11$                       0.0054285391,933.03$                   11436.19$                         5,629.33$                          1,439.82$                    7,069.15$                      648.71$                    12,974.25$                      64 209 74120.0025157733,260.11$                       0.0054285391,933.03$                   11436.19$                         5,629.33$                          1,439.82$                    7,069.15$                      648.71$                    12,974.25$                      65 210 74120.0036472064,726.30$                       0.0078699452,802.37$                   117,186.49$                      14,715.17$                       2,087.37$                    16,802.54$                    1,541.91$                 30,838.25$                      66 211 74120.003713764,812.55$                       0.0080135562,853.51$                   117,186.49$                      14,852.55$                       2,125.46$                    16,978.01$                    1,558.01$                 31,160.30$                      67 212 74120.0025157733,260.11$                       0.0054285391,933.03$                   11436.19$                         5,629.33$                          1,439.82$                    7,069.15$                      648.71$                    12,974.25$                      CondosCommon Common ElementsBuidling Common ElementsLimited Common ElementsTotal Cost to Owner (Before soft and loan financing costs)* Annual Fee (105% of Total Costs)Total P & I Paid Per Unit (105%) - Non prepaid onlyTOTAL COSTS (PREPAYMENT AMOUNT)Total Financing & Soft CostsCity Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 6b) Subject: Public Hearing on Greensboro Condominium Association’s Housing Improvement Area (HIA)Page 14 Building Type Unit #Building Unit #Building #Ownership PercentageTotal Common Cost Ownership Percentage Total Common Cost Garage Locker BalconyTotal Limited Common Cost1,295,869.83$               356,085.70$              6,786.49$        261.58$ 400.00$ 572,319.00$               68 214 74120.0026488833,432.61$                       0.0057157622,035.30$                   117,186.49$                      12,654.40$                       1,516.01$                    14,170.41$                    1,300.37$                 26,007.41$                      69 315 74120.0021164452,742.64$                       0.0045668661,626.20$                   11436.19$                         4,805.02$                          1,211.28$                    6,016.30$                      552.10$                    11,041.92$                      70 301 74120.0026488833,432.61$                       0.0057157622,035.30$                   117,186.49$                      12,654.40$                       1,516.01$                    14,170.41$                    1,300.37$                 26,007.41$                      71302 7412 0.0025157733,260.11$                       0.0054285391,933.03$                   11436.19$                         5,629.33$                          1,439.82$                    7,069.15$                      648.71$                    12,974.25$                      72303 7412 0.0036472064,726.30$                       0.0078699452,802.37$                   117,186.49$                      14,715.17$                       2,087.37$                    16,802.54$                    1,541.91$                 30,838.25$                      73304 7412 0.003713764,812.55$                       0.0080135562,853.51$                   117,186.49$                      14,852.55$                       2,125.46$                    16,978.01$                    1,558.01$                 31,160.30$                      74305 7412 0.0025157733,260.11$                       0.0054285391,933.03$                   11436.19$                         5,629.33$                          1,439.82$                    7,069.15$                      648.71$                    12,974.25$                      75306 7412 0.0026488833,432.61$                       0.0057157622,035.30$                   117,186.49$                      12,654.40$                       1,516.01$                    14,170.41$                    1,300.37$                 26,007.41$                      76307 7412 0.0025157733,260.11$                       0.0054285391,933.03$                   11436.19$                         5,629.33$                          1,439.82$                    7,069.15$                      648.71$                    12,974.25$                      77308 7412 0.0025157733,260.11$                       0.0054285391,933.03$                   11436.19$                         5,629.33$                          1,439.82$                    7,069.15$                      648.71$                    12,974.25$                      78309 7412 0.0026488833,432.61$                       0.0057157622,035.30$                   117,186.49$                      12,654.40$                       1,516.01$                    14,170.41$                    1,300.37$                 26,007.41$                      79310 7412 0.0036472064,726.30$                       0.0078699462,802.38$                   117,186.49$                      14,715.17$                       2,087.37$                    16,802.54$                    1,541.91$                 30,838.25$                      80311 7412 0.003713764,812.55$                       0.0080135562,853.51$                   117,186.49$                      14,852.55$                       2,125.46$                    16,978.01$                    1,558.01$                 31,160.30$                      81312 7412 0.0025157733,260.11$                       0.0054285391,933.03$                   11436.19$                         5,629.33$                          1,439.82$                    7,069.15$                      648.71$                    12,974.25$                      82314 7412 0.0025157733,260.11$                       0.0054285391,933.03$                   11436.19$                         5,629.33$                          1,439.82$                    7,069.15$                      648.71$                    12,974.25$                      83107 7318 0.0024492183,173.87$                       0.0052849271,881.89$                   136.19$                            5,091.94$                          1,401.73$                    6,493.68$                      595.90$                    11,918.06$                      84108 7318 0.0024492183,173.87$                       0.0052849271,881.89$                   136.19$                            5,091.94$                          1,401.73$                    6,493.68$                      595.90$                    11,918.06$                      85109 7318 0.0025823293,346.36$                       0.0055721511,984.16$                   1 6,786.49$                      12,117.02$                       1,477.92$                    13,594.93$                    1,247.56$                 24,951.23$                      86110 7318 0.0035806524,640.06$                       0.0077263332,751.24$                   1 6,786.49$                      14,177.79$                       2,049.28$                    16,227.06$                    1,489.10$                 29,782.06$                      87111 7318 0.0036472064,726.30$                       0.0078699452,802.37$                   1 6,786.49$                      14,315.17$                       2,087.37$                    16,402.54$                    1,505.21$                 30,104.11$                      88112 7318 0.0023161093,001.38$                       0.0049977031,779.61$                   136.19$                            4,817.18$                          1,325.55$                    6,142.73$                      563.70$                    11,273.95$                      89114 7318 0.0023161093,001.38$                       0.0049977031,779.61$                   136.19$                            4,817.18$                          1,325.55$                    6,142.73$                      563.70$                    11,273.95$                      90101 7318 0.0023161093,001.38$                       0.0049977031,779.61$                   136.19$                            4,817.18$                          1,325.55$                    6,142.73$                      563.70$                    11,273.95$                      91102 7318 0.0023161093,001.38$                       0.0049977031,779.61$                   136.19$                            4,817.18$                          1,325.55$                    6,142.73$                      563.70$                    11,273.95$                      92103 7318 0.0034475424,467.57$                       0.0074391082,648.96$                   1 6,786.49$                      13,903.02$                       1,973.09$                    15,876.11$                    1,456.90$                 29,137.95$                      93104 7318 0.0036472064,726.30$                       0.0078699452,802.37$                   1 6,786.49$                      14,315.17$                       2,087.37$                    16,402.54$                    1,505.21$                 30,104.11$                      94105 7318 0.0025823293,346.36$                       0.0055721511,984.16$                   1 6,786.49$                      12,117.02$                       1,477.92$                    13,594.93$                    1,247.56$                 24,951.23$                      95106 7318 0.0024492183,173.87$                       0.0052849271,881.89$                   136.19$                            5,091.94$                          1,401.73$                    6,493.68$                      595.90$                    11,918.06$                      96207 7318 0.0025157733,260.11$                       0.0054285391,933.03$                   11436.19$                         5,629.33$                          1,439.82$                    7,069.15$                      648.71$                    12,974.25$                      97208 7318 0.0026488833,432.61$                       0.0057157622,035.30$                   117,186.49$                      12,654.40$                       1,516.01$                    14,170.41$                    1,300.37$                 26,007.41$                      98209 7318 0.0025157733,260.11$                       0.0054285341,933.02$                   11436.19$                         5,629.33$                          1,439.82$                    7,069.15$                      648.71$                    12,974.25$                      99210 7318 0.0036472064,726.30$                       0.0078699452,802.37$                   117,186.49$                      14,715.17$                       2,087.37$                    16,802.54$                    1,541.91$                 30,838.25$                      100 211 7318 0.003713764,812.55$                       0.0080135562,853.51$                   117,186.49$                      14,852.55$                       2,125.46$                    16,978.01$                    1,558.01$                 31,160.30$                      101 212 7318 0.0025157733,260.11$                       0.0054285371,933.02$                   11436.19$                         5,629.33$                          1,439.82$                    7,069.15$                      648.71$                    12,974.25$                      102 214 7318 0.0026488833,432.61$                       0.0057157622,035.30$                   117,186.49$                      12,654.40$                       1,516.01$                    14,170.41$                    1,300.37$                 26,007.41$                      103 215 7318 0.0021164452,742.64$                       0.0045668661,626.20$                   11436.19$                         4,805.02$                          1,211.28$                    6,016.30$                      552.10$                    11,041.92$                      104 201 7318 0.0025157733,260.11$                       0.0054285391,933.03$                   11436.19$                         5,629.33$                          1,439.82$                    7,069.15$                      648.71$                    12,974.25$                      105 202 7318 0.0025157733,260.11$                       0.0054285391,933.03$                   11436.19$                         5,629.33$                          1,439.82$                    7,069.15$                      648.71$                    12,974.25$                      106 203 7318 0.0036472064,726.30$                       0.0078699452,802.37$                   117,186.49$                      14,715.17$                       2,087.37$                    16,802.54$                    1,541.91$                 30,838.25$                      107 204 7318 0.003713764,812.55$                       0.0080135562,853.51$                   117,186.49$                      14,852.55$                       2,125.46$                    16,978.01$                    1,558.01$                 31,160.30$                      108 205 7318 0.0025157733,260.11$                       0.0054285391,933.03$                   11436.19$                         5,629.33$                          1,439.82$                    7,069.15$                      648.71$                    12,974.25$                      109 206 7318 0.0026488833,432.61$                       0.0057157622,035.30$                   117,186.49$                      12,654.40$                       1,516.01$                    14,170.41$                    1,300.37$                 26,007.41$                      110 3077318 0.0025157733,260.11$                       0.0054285391,933.03$                   11436.19$                         5,629.33$                          1,439.82$                    7,069.15$                      648.71$                    12,974.25$                      111 3087318 0.0026488833,432.61$                       0.0057157672,035.30$                   117,186.49$                      12,654.40$                       1,516.01$                    14,170.41$                    1,300.37$                 26,007.42$                      112 3097318 0.0025157733,260.11$                       0.0054285391,933.03$                   11436.19$                         5,629.33$                          1,439.82$                    7,069.15$                      648.71$                    12,974.25$                      113 310 7318 0.0036472064,726.30$                       0.0078699452,802.37$                   117,186.49$                      14,715.17$                       2,087.37$                    16,802.54$                    1,541.91$                 30,838.25$                      114 311 7318 0.003713764,812.55$                       0.0080135562,853.51$                   117,186.49$                      14,852.55$                       2,125.46$                    16,978.01$                    1,558.01$                 31,160.30$                      115 312 7318 0.0025157733,260.11$                       0.0054285391,933.03$                   11436.19$                         5,629.33$                          1,439.82$                    7,069.15$                      648.71$                    12,974.25$                      116 314 7318 0.0026488833,432.61$                       0.0057157672,035.30$                   117,186.49$                      12,654.40$                       1,516.01$                    14,170.41$                    1,300.37$                 26,007.42$                      117 315 7318 0.0021164452,742.64$                       0.0045668661,626.20$                   11436.19$                         4,805.02$                          1,211.28$                    6,016.30$                      552.10$                    11,041.92$                      118 301 7318 0.0025157733,260.11$                       0.0054285371,933.02$                   11436.19$                         5,629.33$                          1,439.82$                    7,069.15$                      648.71$                    12,974.25$                      119 302 7318 0.0025157733,260.11$                       0.0054285391,933.03$                   11436.19$                         5,629.33$                          1,439.82$                    7,069.15$                      648.71$                    12,974.25$                      120 303 7318 0.0036472064,726.30$                       0.0078699452,802.37$                   117,186.49$                      14,715.17$                       2,087.37$                    16,802.54$                    1,541.91$                 30,838.25$                      121 304 7318 0.003713764,812.55$                       0.0080135562,853.51$                   117,186.49$                      14,852.55$                       2,125.46$                    16,978.01$                    1,558.01$                 31,160.30$                      122 305 7318 0.0026488833,432.61$                       0.0057157622,035.30$                   117,186.49$                      12,654.40$                       1,516.01$                    14,170.41$                    1,300.37$                 26,007.41$                      123 306 7318 0.0025157733,260.11$                       0.0054285391,933.03$                   11436.19$                         5,629.33$                          1,439.82$                    7,069.15$                      648.71$                    12,974.25$                      124 101 7316 0.0023161093,001.38$                       0.0049977031,779.61$                   136.19$                            4,817.18$                          1,325.55$                    6,142.73$                      563.70$                    11,273.95$                      125 114 7316 0.0023161093,001.38$                       0.0049977031,779.61$                   136.19$                            4,817.18$                          1,325.55$                    6,142.73$                      563.70$                    11,273.95$                      126 112 7316 0.0023161093,001.38$                       0.0049977031,779.61$                   136.19$                            4,817.18$                          1,325.55$                    6,142.73$                      563.70$                    11,273.95$                      127 111 7316 0.0036472064,726.30$                       0.0078699452,802.37$                   1 6,786.49$                      14,315.17$                       2,087.37$                    16,402.54$                    1,505.21$                 30,104.11$                      128 110 7316 0.0035806524,640.06$                       0.0077263332,751.24$                   1 6,786.49$                      14,177.79$                       2,049.28$                    16,227.06$                    1,489.10$                 29,782.06$                      129 109 7316 0.0025823293,346.36$                       0.0055721511,984.16$                   1 6,786.49$                      12,117.02$                       1,477.92$                    13,594.93$                    1,247.56$                 24,951.23$                      130 108 7316 0.0024492183,173.87$                       0.0052849271,881.89$                   136.19$                            5,091.94$                          1,401.73$                    6,493.68$                      595.90$                    11,918.06$                      * Annual Fee (105% of Total Costs)Total P & I Paid Per Unit (105%) - Non prepaid onlyCondosCommon Common ElementsBuidling Common ElementsLimited Common ElementsTotal Cost to Owner (Before soft and loan financing costs)Total Financing & Soft CostsTOTAL COSTS (PREPAYMENT AMOUNT)City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 6b) Subject: Public Hearing on Greensboro Condominium Association’s Housing Improvement Area (HIA)Page 15 Building Type Unit #Building Unit #Building #Ownership PercentageTotal Common Cost Ownership Percentage Total Common Cost Garage Locker BalconyTotal Limited Common Cost1,295,869.83$               356,085.70$              6,786.49$        261.58$ 400.00$ 572,319.00$               131 107 7316 0.0024492183,173.87$                       0.0052849271,881.89$                   136.19$                            5,091.94$                          1,401.73$                    6,493.68$                      595.90$                    11,918.06$                      132 106 7316 0.0025823293,346.36$                       0.0055721511,984.16$                   1 6,786.49$                      12,117.02$                       1,477.92$                    13,594.93$                    1,247.56$                 24,951.23$                      133 105 7316 0.0024492183,173.87$                       0.0052849271,881.89$                   136.19$                            5,091.94$                          1,401.73$                    6,493.68$                      595.90$                    11,918.06$                      134 104 7316 0.0036472064,726.30$                       0.0078699452,802.37$                   1 6,786.49$                      14,315.17$                       2,087.37$                    16,402.54$                    1,505.21$                 30,104.11$                      135 103 7316 0.0034475424,467.57$                       0.0074391082,648.96$                   1 6,786.49$                      13,903.02$                       1,973.09$                    15,876.11$                    1,456.90$                 29,137.95$                      136 102 7316 0.0023161093,001.38$                       0.0049977031,779.61$                   11436.19$                         5,217.18$                          1,325.55$                    6,542.73$                      600.40$                    12,008.08$                      137 201 7316 0.0025157733,260.11$                       0.0054285391,933.03$                   11436.19$                         5,629.33$                          1,439.82$                    7,069.15$                      648.71$                    12,974.25$                      138 215 7316 0.0021164452,742.64$                       0.0045668661,626.20$                   11436.19$                         4,805.02$                          1,211.28$                    6,016.30$                      552.10$                    11,041.92$                      139 214 7316 0.0026488833,432.61$                       0.0057157622,035.30$                   117,186.49$                      12,654.40$                       1,516.01$                    14,170.41$                    1,300.37$                 26,007.41$                      140 212 7316 0.0025157733,260.11$                       0.0054285391,933.03$                   11436.19$                         5,629.33$                          1,439.82$                    7,069.15$                      648.71$                    12,974.25$                      141 211 7316 0.003713764,812.55$                       0.0080135562,853.51$                   117,186.49$                      14,852.55$                       2,125.46$                    16,978.01$                    1,558.01$                 31,160.30$                      142 210 7316 0.0036472064,726.30$                       0.0078699452,802.37$                   117,186.49$                      14,715.17$                       2,087.37$                    16,802.54$                    1,541.91$                 30,838.25$                      143 209 7316 0.0025157733,260.11$                       0.0054285391,933.03$                   11436.19$                         5,629.33$                          1,439.82$                    7,069.15$                      648.71$                    12,974.25$                      144 208 7316 0.0025157733,260.11$                       0.0054285391,933.03$                   11436.19$                         5,629.33$                          1,439.82$                    7,069.15$                      648.71$                    12,974.25$                      145 207 7316 0.0026488833,432.61$                       0.0057157622,035.30$                   117,186.49$                      12,654.40$                       1,516.01$                    14,170.41$                    1,300.37$                 26,007.41$                      146 206 7316 0.0025157733,260.11$                       0.0054285391,933.03$                   11436.19$                         5,629.33$                          1,439.82$                    7,069.15$                      648.71$                    12,974.25$                      147 205 7316 0.0025157733,260.11$                       0.0054285391,933.03$                   11436.19$                         5,629.33$                          1,439.82$                    7,069.15$                      648.71$                    12,974.25$                      148 204 7316 0.003713764,812.55$                       0.0080135562,853.51$                   117,186.49$                      14,852.55$                       2,125.46$                    16,978.01$                    1,558.01$                 31,160.30$                      149 203 7316 0.0036472064,726.30$                       0.0078699452,802.37$                   117,186.49$                      14,715.17$                       2,087.37$                    16,802.54$                    1,541.91$                 30,838.25$                      150 202 7316 0.0026488833,432.61$                       0.0057157622,035.30$                   117,186.49$                      12,654.40$                       1,516.01$                    14,170.41$                    1,300.37$                 26,007.41$                      151 301 7316 0.0025157733,260.11$                       0.0054285391,933.03$                   11436.19$                         5,629.33$                          1,439.82$                    7,069.15$                      648.71$                    12,974.25$                      152 315 7316 0.0021164452,742.64$                       0.0045668661,626.20$                   11436.19$                         4,805.02$                          1,211.28$                    6,016.30$                      552.10$                    11,041.92$                      153 314 7316 0.0026488833,432.61$                       0.0057157622,035.30$                   117,186.49$                      12,654.40$                       1,516.01$                    14,170.41$                    1,300.37$                 26,007.41$                      154 312 7316 0.0025157733,260.11$                       0.0054285391,933.03$                   11436.19$                         5,629.33$                          1,439.82$                    7,069.15$                      648.71$                    12,974.25$                      155 311 7316 0.003713764,812.55$                       0.0080135562,853.51$                   117,186.49$                      14,852.55$                       2,125.46$                    16,978.01$                    1,558.01$                 31,160.30$                      156 310 7316 0.0036472064,726.30$                       0.0078699452,802.37$                   117,186.49$                      14,715.17$                       2,087.37$                    16,802.54$                    1,541.91$                 30,838.25$                      157 309 7316 0.0025157733,260.11$                       0.0054278541,932.78$                   11436.19$                         5,629.08$                          1,439.82$                    7,068.91$                      648.69$                    12,973.80$                      158 308 7316 0.0025157733,260.11$                       0.0054278541,932.78$                   11436.19$                         5,629.08$                          1,439.82$                    7,068.91$                      648.69$                    12,973.80$                      159 307 7316 0.0026488833,432.61$                       0.0057157622,035.30$                   117,186.49$                      12,654.40$                       1,516.01$                    14,170.41$                    1,300.37$                 26,007.41$                      160 306 7316 0.0026488833,432.61$                       0.0057157622,035.30$                   117,186.49$                      12,654.40$                       1,516.01$                    14,170.41$                    1,300.37$                 26,007.41$                      161 305 7316 0.0025157733,260.11$                       0.0054285391,933.03$                   11436.19$                         5,629.33$                          1,439.82$                    7,069.15$                      648.71$                    12,974.25$                      162 304 7316 0.003713764,812.55$                       0.0080135562,853.51$                   117,186.49$                      14,852.55$                       2,125.46$                    16,978.01$                    1,558.01$                 31,160.30$                      163 303 7316 0.0036472064,726.30$                       0.0078699452,802.37$                   117,186.49$                      14,715.17$                       2,087.37$                    16,802.54$                    1,541.91$                 30,838.25$                      164 302 7316 0.0025157733,260.11$                       0.0054285391,933.03$                   11436.19$                         5,629.33$                          1,439.82$                    7,069.15$                      648.71$                    12,974.25$                      0.4634347           3,192,290.74$               0.999998630                 1,068,256.61$           13653 607 913 591,159.32$                 1,547,795.61$                 1,409,870.50$            1,813,028.11$              166,375.49$            3,327,509.77$                Total P & I Paid Per Unit (105%) - Non prepaid onlyCondosCommon Common ElementsBuidling Common ElementsLimited Common ElementsTotal Cost to Owner (Before soft and loan financing costs)Total Financing & Soft CostsTOTAL COSTS (PREPAYMENT AMOUNT)* Annual Fee (105% of Total Costs)TOTALCity Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 6b) Subject: Public Hearing on Greensboro Condominium Association’s Housing Improvement Area (HIA)Page 16 Owner TotalBuilding TypeNumber of UnitsUnit # Building #Ownership PercentageTotal Common Cost Ownership Percentage Total Common Cost Garage Locker BalconyTotal Limited Common CostTotal Cost to Owner (Before cost of loan)1,295,869.83$               206,083.16$              6,786.49$ -$ -$ 572,319.00$ 165 7453 7453 0.0051912816,727.22$                       0.0269896195,562.106$                 16,786.49$                      19,075.82$                       2,971.07$                    22,046.89$                    2,023.17$                 40,463.38$                      166 7449 7449 0.0051247246,640.98$                       0.0266435985,490.797$                 16,786.49$                      18,918.26$                       2,932.98$                    21,851.24$                    2,005.21$                 40,104.30$                      167 7445 7445 0.0049916146,468.48$                       0.0259515585,348.179$                 16,786.49$                      18,603.15$                       2,856.80$                    21,459.95$                    1,969.31$                 39,386.15$                      168 7441 7441 0.0049916146,468.48$                       0.0259515585,348.179$                 16,786.49$                      18,603.15$                       2,856.80$                    21,459.95$                    1,969.31$                 39,386.15$                      169 7437 7437 0.0049916146,468.48$                       0.0259515585,348.179$                 16,786.49$                      18,603.15$                       2,856.80$                    21,459.95$                    1,969.31$                 39,386.15$                      170 7433 7433 0.0049916146,468.48$                       0.0259515585,348.179$                 16,786.49$                      18,603.15$                       2,856.80$                    21,459.95$                    1,969.31$                 39,386.15$                      171 7429 7429 0.0049916146,468.48$                       0.0259515585,348.179$                 16,786.49$                      18,603.15$                       2,856.80$                    21,459.95$                    1,969.31$                 39,386.15$                      172 7425 7425 0.0049916146,468.48$                       0.0259515585,348.179$                 16,786.49$                      18,603.15$                       2,856.80$                    21,459.95$                    1,969.31$                 39,386.15$                      173 7421 7421 0.0051247246,640.98$                       0.0266435985,490.797$                 16,786.49$                      18,918.26$                       2,932.98$                    21,851.24$                    2,005.21$                 40,104.30$                      174 7417 7417 0.0051912816,727.22$                       0.0269896195,562.106$                 16,786.49$                      19,075.82$                       2,971.07$                    22,046.89$                    2,023.17$                 40,463.38$                      175 7413 7413 0.0051912816,727.22$                       0.0269896195,562.106$                 16,786.49$                      19,075.82$                       2,971.07$                    22,046.89$                    2,023.17$                 40,463.38$                      176 7409 7409 0.0051247246,640.98$                       0.0266435985,490.797$                 16,786.49$                      18,918.26$                       2,932.98$                    21,851.24$                    2,005.21$                 40,104.30$                      177 7405 7405 0.0049916146,468.48$                       0.0259515585,348.179$                 16,786.49$                      18,603.15$                       2,856.80$                    21,459.95$                    1,969.31$                 39,386.15$                      178 7401 7401 0.0049916146,468.48$                       0.0259515585,348.179$                 16,786.49$                      18,603.15$                       2,856.80$                    21,459.95$                    1,969.31$                 39,386.15$                      179 7361 7361 0.0049916146,468.48$                       0.0259515585,348.179$                 16,786.49$                      18,603.15$                       2,856.80$                    21,459.95$                    1,969.31$                 39,386.15$                      180 7357 7357 0.0049916146,468.48$                       0.0259515585,348.179$                 16,786.49$                      18,603.15$                       2,856.80$                    21,459.95$                    1,969.31$                 39,386.15$                      181 7353 7353 0.0049916146,468.48$                       0.0259515585,348.179$                 16,786.49$                      18,603.15$                       2,856.80$                    21,459.95$                    1,969.31$                 39,386.15$                      182 7349 7349 0.0049916146,468.48$                       0.0259515585,348.179$                 16,786.49$                      18,603.15$                       2,856.80$                    21,459.95$                    1,969.31$                 39,386.15$                      183 7345 7345 0.0051247246,640.98$                       0.0266435985,490.797$                 16,786.49$                      18,918.26$                       2,932.98$                    21,851.24$                    2,005.21$                 40,104.30$                      184 7341 7341 0.0051912816,727.22$                       0.0269896195,562.106$                 16,786.49$                      19,075.82$                       2,971.07$                    22,046.89$                    2,023.17$                 40,463.38$                      185 7337 7337 0.0051912816,727.22$                       0.0269896195,562.106$                 16,786.49$                      19,075.82$                       2,971.07$                    22,046.89$                    2,023.17$                 40,463.38$                      186 7333 7333 0.0051247246,640.98$                       0.0266435985,490.797$                 16,786.49$                      18,918.26$                       2,932.98$                    21,851.24$                    2,005.21$                 40,104.30$                      187 7329 7329 0.0049916146,468.48$                       0.0259515585,348.179$                 16,786.49$                      18,603.15$                       2,856.80$                    21,459.95$                    1,969.31$                 39,386.15$                      188 7325 7325 0.0049916146,468.48$                       0.0259515585,348.179$                 16,786.49$                      18,603.15$                       2,856.80$                    21,459.95$                    1,969.31$                 39,386.15$                      189 7321 7321 0.0049916146,468.48$                       0.0259515585,348.179$                 16,786.49$                      18,603.15$                       2,856.80$                    21,459.95$                    1,969.31$                 39,386.15$                      190 7317 7317 0.0049916146,468.48$                       0.0259515585,348.179$                 16,786.49$                      18,603.15$                       2,856.80$                    21,459.95$                    1,969.31$                 39,386.15$                      191 7313 7313 0.0049916146,468.48$                       0.0259515585,348.179$                 16,786.49$                      18,603.15$                       2,856.80$                    21,459.95$                    1,969.31$                 39,386.15$                      192 7309 7309 0.0049916146,468.48$                       0.0259515585,348.179$                 16,786.49$                      18,603.15$                       2,856.80$                    21,459.95$                    1,969.31$                 39,386.15$                      193 7305 7305 0.0051247246,640.98$                       0.0266435985,490.797$                 16,786.49$                      18,918.26$                       2,932.98$                    21,851.24$                    2,005.21$                 40,104.30$                      194 7301 7301 0.0051912816,727.22$                       0.0269896195,562.106$                 16,786.49$                      19,075.82$                       2,971.07$                    22,046.89$                    2,023.17$                 40,463.38$                      227 7235 7235 0.0051912816,727.22$                       0.0269896195,562.106$                 16,786.49$                      19,075.82$                       2,971.07$                    22,046.89$                    2,023.17$                 40,463.38$                      228 7231 7231 0.0051247246,640.98$                       0.0266435985,490.797$                 16,786.49$                      18,918.26$                       2,932.98$                    21,851.24$                    2,005.21$                 40,104.30$                      229 7227 7227 0.0049916146,468.48$                       0.0259515585,348.179$                 16,786.49$                      18,603.15$                       2,856.80$                    21,459.95$                    1,969.31$                 39,386.15$                      230 7223 7223 0.0049916146,468.48$                       0.0259515585,348.179$                 16,786.49$                      18,603.15$                       2,856.80$                    21,459.95$                    1,969.31$                 39,386.15$                      231 7219 7219 0.0049916146,468.48$                       0.0259515585,348.179$                 16,786.49$                      18,603.15$                       2,856.80$                    21,459.95$                    1,969.31$                 39,386.15$                      232 7215 7215 0.0049916146,468.48$                       0.0259515585,348.179$                 16,786.49$                      18,603.15$                       2,856.80$                    21,459.95$                    1,969.31$                 39,386.15$                      233 7211 7211 0.0051247246,640.98$                       0.0266435985,490.797$                 16,786.49$                      18,918.26$                       2,932.98$                    21,851.24$                    2,005.21$                 40,104.30$                      234 7207 7207 0.0051912816,727.22$                       0.0269896195,562.106$                 16,786.49$                      19,075.82$                       2,971.07$                    22,046.89$                    2,023.17$                 40,463.38$                      0.19                      249,252.20$                  1.000000012 206,083.16$              38 0 0 257,886.72$                 713,222.08$                     110,081.87$               823,303.95$                 75,551.83$              1,511,036.65$                Buidling Common ElementsLimited Common ElementsTOTALCommon Common Elements* Annual Fee (105% of Total Costs)Total P & I Paid Per Unit (105%) - Non prepaid onlyTOTAL COSTS (PREPAYMENT AMOUNT)Total Financing & Soft Costs2-BedroomCity Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 6b) Subject: Public Hearing on Greensboro Condominium Association’s Housing Improvement Area (HIA)Page 17 Owner TotalBuilding TypeNumber of UnitsUnit # Building #Ownership PercentageTotal Common Cost Ownership Percentage Total Common Cost Garage Locker BalconyTotal Limited Common CostTotal Cost to Owner (Before cost of loan)1,295,869.83$               396,663.21$              -$ -$ 7,000.00$ 572,319.00$ 195 7233 7233 0.0060564937,848.43$                       0.0175947746,979.20$                   17,000.00$                      21,827.63$                       3,466.25$                    25,293.87$                    2,321.13$                 46,422.67$                      196 7229 7229 0.0059899367,762.18$                       0.0174013926,902.49$                   17,000.00$                      21,664.67$                       3,428.15$                    25,092.82$                    2,302.68$                 46,053.68$                      197 7225 7225 0.0057902737,503.44$                       0.0168213456,672.41$                   ‐$                                14,175.85$                       3,313.88$                    17,489.73$                    1,604.97$                 32,099.48$                      198 7221 7221 0.0057902737,503.44$                       0.0168213456,672.41$                   ‐$                                14,175.85$                       3,313.88$                    17,489.73$                    1,604.97$                 32,099.48$                      199 7217 7217 0.0057902737,503.44$                       0.0168213456,672.41$                   ‐$                                14,175.85$                       3,313.88$                    17,489.73$                    1,604.97$                 32,099.48$                      200 7213 7213 0.0057902737,503.44$                       0.0168213456,672.41$                   ‐$                                14,175.85$                       3,313.88$                    17,489.73$                    1,604.97$                 32,099.48$                      201 7209 7209 0.0059899367,762.18$                       0.0174013926,902.49$                   ‐$                                14,664.67$                       3,428.15$                    18,092.82$                    1,660.32$                 33,206.35$                      202 7205 7205 0.0060564937,848.43$                       0.0175947746,979.20$                   ‐$                                14,827.63$                       3,466.25$                    18,293.87$                    1,678.77$                 33,575.34$                      203 7451 7451 0.0060564937,848.43$                       0.0175947446,979.19$                   ‐$                                14,827.61$                       3,466.25$                    18,293.86$                    1,678.77$                 33,575.32$                      204 7447 7447 0.0059899367,762.18$                       0.0174013926,902.49$                   17,000.00$                      21,664.67$                       3,428.15$                    25,092.82$                    2,302.68$                 46,053.68$                      205 7439 7439 0.0057902737,503.44$                       0.0168213456,672.41$                   ‐$                                14,175.85$                       3,313.88$                    17,489.73$                    1,604.97$                 32,099.48$                      206 7435 7435 0.0059233837,675.93$                       0.0172080436,825.80$                   ‐$                                14,501.73$                       3,390.06$                    17,891.80$                    1,641.87$                 32,837.40$                      207 7431 7431 0.0059233837,675.93$                       0.0172080436,825.80$                   ‐$                                14,501.73$                       3,390.06$                    17,891.80$                    1,641.87$                 32,837.40$                      208 7427 7427 0.0057902737,503.44$                       0.0168213456,672.41$                   ‐$                                14,175.85$                       3,313.88$                    17,489.73$                    1,604.97$                 32,099.48$                      209 7423 7423 0.0059899367,762.18$                       0.0174013926,902.49$                   17,000.00$                      21,664.67$                       3,428.15$                    25,092.82$                    2,302.68$                 46,053.68$                      210 7419 7419 0.0060564937,848.43$                       0.0175947446,979.19$                   17,000.00$                      21,827.61$                       3,466.25$                    25,293.86$                    2,321.13$                 46,422.65$                      211 7411 7411 0.0060564937,848.43$                       0.0175947446,979.19$                   17,000.00$                      21,827.61$                       3,466.25$                    25,293.86$                    2,321.13$                 46,422.65$                      212 7407 7407 0.0059899367,762.18$                       0.0174013926,902.49$                   17,000.00$                      21,664.67$                       3,428.15$                    25,092.82$                    2,302.68$                 46,053.68$                      213 7403 7403 0.0057902737,503.44$                       0.0168213456,672.41$                   ‐$                                14,175.85$                       3,313.88$                    17,489.73$                    1,604.97$                 32,099.48$                      214 7351 7351 0.0059233837,675.93$                       0.0172080436,825.80$                   ‐$                                14,501.73$                       3,390.06$                    17,891.80$                    1,641.87$                 32,837.40$                      215 7347 7347 0.0059233837,675.93$                       0.0172080436,825.80$                   ‐$                                14,501.73$                       3,390.06$                    17,891.80$                    1,641.87$                 32,837.40$                      216 7343 7343 0.0057902737,503.44$                       0.0168213456,672.41$                   ‐$                                14,175.85$                       3,313.88$                    17,489.73$                    1,604.97$                 32,099.48$                      217 7339 7339 0.0059899367,762.18$                       0.0174013926,902.49$                   17,000.00$                      21,664.67$                       3,428.15$                    25,092.82$                    2,302.68$                 46,053.68$                      218 7335 7335 0.0060564937,848.43$                       0.0175947446,979.19$                   ‐$                                14,827.61$                       3,466.25$                    18,293.86$                    1,678.77$                 33,575.32$                      219 7331 7331 0.0060564937,848.43$                       0.0175947446,979.19$                   17,000.00$                      21,827.61$                       3,466.25$                    25,293.86$                    2,321.13$                 46,422.65$                      220 7327 7327 0.0059899367,762.18$                       0.0174013926,902.49$                   17,000.00$                      21,664.67$                       3,428.15$                    25,092.82$                    2,302.68$                 46,053.68$                      221 7323 7323 0.0057902737,503.44$                       0.0168213456,672.41$                   ‐$                                14,175.85$                       3,313.88$                    17,489.73$                    1,604.97$                 32,099.48$                      222 7319 7319 0.0059233837,675.93$                       0.0172080436,825.80$                   ‐$                                14,501.73$                       3,390.06$                    17,891.80$                    1,641.87$                 32,837.40$                      223 7315 7315 0.0059233837,675.93$                       0.0172080436,825.80$                   ‐$                                14,501.73$                       3,390.06$                    17,891.80$                    1,641.87$                 32,837.40$                      224 7311 7311 0.0057902737,503.44$                       0.0168213456,672.41$                   ‐$                                14,175.85$                       3,313.88$                    17,489.73$                    1,604.97$                 32,099.48$                      225 7307 7307 0.0059899367,762.18$                       0.0174013926,902.49$                   17,000.00$                      21,664.67$                       3,428.15$                    25,092.82$                    2,302.68$                 46,053.68$                      226 7303 7303 0.0060564937,848.43$                       0.0175947446,979.19$                   17,000.00$                      21,827.61$                       3,466.25$                    25,293.86$                    2,321.13$                 46,422.65$                      235 2004 2004 0.0059899367,762.18$                       0.0174013926,902.49$                   ‐$                                14,664.67$                       3,428.15$                    18,092.82$                    1,660.32$                 33,206.35$                      236 2006 2006 0.0059233837,675.93$                       0.0172080436,825.80$                   ‐$                                14,501.73$                       3,390.06$                    17,891.80$                    1,641.87$                 32,837.40$                      237 2008 2008 0.0059233837,675.93$                       0.0172080436,825.80$                   ‐$                                14,501.73$                       3,390.06$                    17,891.80$                    1,641.87$                 32,837.40$                      238 2010 2010 0.0057902737,503.44$                       0.0168213456,672.41$                   ‐$                                14,175.85$                       3,313.88$                    17,489.73$                    1,604.97$                 32,099.48$                      239 2012 2012 0.0059899367,762.18$                       0.0174013926,902.49$                   17,000.00$                      21,664.67$                       3,428.15$                    25,092.82$                    2,302.68$                 46,053.68$                      240 2014 2014 0.0059899367,762.18$                       0.0174013926,902.49$                   ‐$                                14,664.67$                       3,428.15$                    18,092.82$                    1,660.32$                 33,206.35$                      241 2016 2016 0.0059899367,762.18$                       0.0174013926,902.49$                   ‐$                                14,664.67$                       3,428.15$                    18,092.82$                    1,660.32$                 33,206.35$                      242 2018 2018 0.0059899367,762.18$                       0.0174013926,902.49$                   17,000.00$                      21,664.67$                       3,428.15$                    25,092.82$                    2,302.68$                 46,053.68$                      243 2020 2020 0.0057902737,503.44$                       0.0168213456,672.41$                   ‐$                                14,175.85$                       3,313.88$                    17,489.73$                    1,604.97$                 32,099.48$                      244 2022 2022 0.0059899367,762.18$                       0.0174013926,902.49$                   ‐$                                14,664.67$                       3,428.15$                    18,092.82$                    1,660.32$                 33,206.35$                      245 2024 2024 0.0059899367,762.18$                       0.0174013926,902.49$                   ‐$                                14,664.67$                       3,428.15$                    18,092.82$                    1,660.32$                 33,206.35$                      246 2026 2026 0.0057902737,503.44$                       0.0168213456,672.41$                   ‐$                                14,175.85$                       3,313.88$                    17,489.73$                    1,604.97$                 32,099.48$                      247 2028 2028 0.0059899367,762.18$                       0.0174013926,902.49$                   17,000.00$                      21,664.67$                       3,428.15$                    25,092.82$                    2,302.68$                 46,053.68$                      248 2030 2030 0.0059899367,762.18$                       0.0174013926,902.49$                   17,000.00$                      21,664.67$                       3,428.15$                    25,092.82$                    2,302.68$                 46,053.68$                      249 2032 2032 0.0059899367,762.18$                       0.0174013926,902.49$                   17,000.00$                      21,664.67$                       3,428.15$                    25,092.82$                    2,302.68$                 46,053.68$                      250 2034 2034 0.0059899367,762.18$                       0.0174013926,902.49$                   17,000.00$                      21,664.67$                       3,428.15$                    25,092.82$                    2,302.68$                 46,053.68$                      251 2036 2036 0.0057902737,503.44$                       0.0168213456,672.41$                   ‐$                                14,175.85$                       3,313.88$                    17,489.73$                    1,604.97$                 32,099.48$                      252 2038 2038 0.0059899367,762.18$                       0.0174013926,902.49$                   ‐$                                14,664.67$                       3,428.15$                    18,092.82$                    1,660.32$                 33,206.35$                      253 2054 2054 0.0059899367,762.18$                       0.0174013926,902.49$                   ‐$                                14,664.67$                       3,428.15$                    18,092.82$                    1,660.32$                 33,206.35$                      254 2052 2052 0.0057902737,503.44$                       0.0168213456,672.41$                   ‐$                                14,175.85$                       3,313.88$                    17,489.73$                    1,604.97$                 32,099.48$                      255 2050 2050 0.0059899367,762.18$                       0.0174013926,902.49$                   17,000.00$                      21,664.67$                       3,428.15$                    25,092.82$                    2,302.68$                 46,053.68$                      256 2048 2048 0.0059899367,762.18$                       0.0174013926,902.49$                   ‐$                                14,664.67$                       3,428.15$                    18,092.82$                    1,660.32$                 33,206.35$                      257 2046 2046 0.0059899367,762.18$                       0.0174013926,902.49$                   ‐$                                14,664.67$                       3,428.15$                    18,092.82$                    1,660.32$                 33,206.35$                      258 2044 2044 0.0059899367,762.18$                       0.0174013926,902.49$                   17,000.00$                      21,664.67$                       3,428.15$                    25,092.82$                    2,302.68$                 46,053.68$                      259 2042 2042 0.0057902737,503.44$                       0.0168213456,672.41$                   ‐$                                14,175.85$                       3,313.88$                    17,489.73$                    1,604.97$                 32,099.48$                      260 2040 2040 0.0059899367,762.18$                       0.0174013926,902.49$                   ‐$                                14,664.67$                       3,428.15$                    18,092.82$                    1,660.32$                 33,206.35$                      0.34                      446,066.53$                  1.000000068                 396,663.23$              0 0 20 140,000.00$                 982,729.77$                     197,004.63$               1,179,734.39$              108,260.26$            2,165,205.11$                1.00            3,887,609.47   2.999998710   1,671,003.00 13691 607 933 989,046.03     3,243,747.45    1,716,956.99 3,816,066.93   350,187.58 7,003,751.53   Limited Common Elements3‐BedroomTOTALGRANDTOTALTotal P & I Paid Per Unit (105%) - Non prepaid only* Annual Fee (105% of Total Costs)TOTAL COSTS (PREPAYMENT AMOUNT)Total Financing & Soft CostsCommon Common ElementsBuidling Common ElementsCity Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 6b) Subject: Public Hearing on Greensboro Condominium Association’s Housing Improvement Area (HIA)Page 18 ORDINANCE NO. ____-11 ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING THE GREENSBORO CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSOCIATION HOUSING IMPROVEMENT AREA PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES, SECTIONS 428A.11 to 428A.21 BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park as follows: Section 1. Recitals. 1.01. The City of St. Louis Park ("City") is authorized under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 428A.11 to 428A.21 (the "Act") to establish by ordinance a housing improvement area within which housing improvements are made or constructed and the costs of the improvements are paid in whole or in part from fees imposed within the area. 1.02. The St. Louis Park City Council (“Council”) adopted a Housing Improvement Area policy on July 16, 2001. 1.03. The City has determined a need to establish the Greensboro Condominium Owners Association Housing Improvement Area as further defined herein, in order to facilitate certain improvements to property known as the "Greensboro Condominium Owners Association” all in accordance with the Housing Improvement Area policy. 1.04. The City has consulted with the Greensboro Condominium Owners Association (the “Condominium Association”) and with residents in the proposed Greensboro Condominium Owners Association Housing Improvement Area regarding the establishment of the Greensboro Condominium Owners Association Housing Improvement Area and the housing improvements to be constructed and financed under this ordinance. Section 2. Findings. 2.01. The Council finds that, in accordance with Section 428A.12 of the Act, owners of at least 50 percent of the housing units within the proposed Greensboro Condominium Owners Association Housing Improvement Area have filed a petition with the City Clerk requesting a public hearing regarding establishment of such housing improvement area. 2.02. The Council has on November 21, 2011, conducted a public hearing, duly noticed in accordance with Section 428A.13 of the Act, regarding adoption of this ordinance, at which all persons, including owners of property within the proposed Greensboro Condominium Owners Association Housing Improvement Area, were given an opportunity to be heard. 2.03. The Council finds that, without establishment of the Greensboro Condominium Owners Association Housing Improvement Area, the Housing Improvements (as hereinafter defined) could not be made by the condominium association for, or the housing unit owners in, the Greensboro Condominium Owners Association. 2.04. The Council further finds that designation of the Greensboro Condominium Owners Association Housing Improvement Area is needed to maintain and preserve the housing units within such area. 2.05. The Council further finds that by Resolution No. _____ adopted on the date hereof, the City has provided full disclosure of public expenditures, loans, bonds, or other financing arrangements in connection with the Greensboro Housing Improvement Area, and has determined City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 6b) Subject: Public Hearing on Greensboro Condominium Association’s Housing Improvement Area (HIA)Page 19 that the Greensboro Condominium Owners Association will contract for the Housing Improvements. 2.06. The City will be the implementing entity for the Greensboro Condominium Owners Association Housing Improvement Area and the improvement fee. 2.07. The Council finds that the Greensboro Condominium Owners Association Housing Improvement Area meets each of the approval criteria contained in the Housing Improvement Area Policy (listed as 5.01A- 5.01M), including the criterion that a majority of the condominium association owners support the project and the Housing Improvement Area financing. The Condominium Association presented evidence to the Council adequate to demonstrate that these criteria were met, including presentation to the Council of the petitions described in 2.01 above. Section 3. Housing Improvement Area Defined. 3.01. The Greensboro Condominium Owners Association Housing Improvement Area is hereby defined as the area of the City legally described in Exhibit A. 3.02. The Greensboro Condominium Owners Association Housing Improvement Area contains 260 housing units as of the date of adoption of this ordinance, along with garage units and common areas. Section 4. Housing Improvements Defined. 4.01. For the purposes of this ordinance and the Greensboro Condominium Owners Association Housing Improvement Area, the term "Housing Improvements" shall mean the following improvements to housing units, garages, and common areas within the Greensboro Condominium Owners Association Housing Improvement Area: Site Work: Complete asphalt pavement replacement including grade repairs, new concrete curb and gutter. Repair water main, sanitary sewer and storm sewer. Resident Buildings: Remove siding and replace with new flux mansard design. New aluminum store fronts (windows/doors) at condo building, front, back, and side entries. Repair balconies as needed and repaint all balconies. Repair voids at slabs and patios. Garages Repairs: Brick removal and siding install, wall and roof framing repairs. Install perimeter drain tile, new roof, new garage doors as required and install garage lockers. Possible common items if funds allow: Brick repair, sidewalk repair, community building interior renovations, pool renovations. 4.02. Housing Improvements shall also be deemed to include: (a) all costs of architectural and engineering services in connection with the activities described in Section 4.01; (b) all administration, legal and consultant costs in connection with the Greensboro Condominium Owners Association Housing Improvement Area; and (c) costs of arranging financing for the Housing Improvements under the Housing Improvement Act; and (d) interest on the internal loan as described in Sections 5.04 and 6.01. Section 5. Housing Improvement Fee. City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 6b) Subject: Public Hearing on Greensboro Condominium Association’s Housing Improvement Area (HIA)Page 20 5.01. The City may, by resolution adopted in accordance with the petition, hearing and notice procedures required under Section 428A.14 of the Act, impose a fee on the housing units within the Greensboro Condominium Owners Association Housing Improvement Area, at a rate, term or amount sufficient to produce revenues required to finance the construction of the Housing Improvements (hereinafter referred to as the "Housing Improvement Fee"), subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Section. 5.02. The Housing Improvement Fee shall be imposed for Common and Building Common Elements based on the square footage (percentage of undivided ownership) of each unit, and shall be imposed for Limited Common Elements based on the actual cost of garages, lockers and balconies for each unit, all as prescribed in the Amended and Restated Declaration of Greensboro Condominium. 5.03. The Housing Improvement Fee shall be imposed and payable for a period no greater than 20 years after the first installment is due and payable. 5.04. Housing unit owners shall be permitted to prepay the Housing Improvement Fee in accordance with the terms specified in the resolution imposing the fee. 5.05. The Housing Improvement Fee shall not exceed the amount specified in the notice of public hearing regarding the approval of such fee; provided, however, that the Housing Improvement Fee may be reduced after approval of the resolution setting the Housing Improvement Fee, in the manner specified in such resolution. Section 6. Housing Improvement Area Loan and Bonds. 6.01. At any time after a contract with the Condominium Association for construction of all or part of the Housing Improvements has been entered into or the work has been ordered, and the period for prepayment without interest of the Housing Improvement Fee has begun as described in Section 5.04 hereof, the Council may begin disbursement to the Condominium Association of the proceeds of an internal loan (the “Loan”) of available City funds in the principal amounts necessary to finance a portion of the cost of the Housing Improvements that have not been prepaid, together with administrative costs. 6.02. In addition to the Loan, at any time after the period for prepayment without interest of the Housing Improvement Fee has ended, the City may issue its bonds secured by Housing Improvement Fees, as authorized pursuant to Section 428A.16 of the Act, in a principal amount necessary to finance the portion of the cost of the Housing Improvements not financed through the Loan. Section 7. Annual Reports. 7.01. On March 1, 2013, and each March 1 thereafter until there are no longer any outstanding obligations issued under the Act in connection with the Greensboro Condominium Owners Association Housing Improvement Area, Greensboro Condominium Owners Association (and any successor in interest) shall submit to the City Clerk a copy of the condominium association's audited financial statements. 7.02. The Condominium Association (and any successor in interest) shall also submit to the City any other reports or information at the times and as required by any contract entered into between that entity and the City. Section 8. Notice of Right to File Objections. City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 6b) Subject: Public Hearing on Greensboro Condominium Association’s Housing Improvement Area (HIA)Page 21 8.01. Within five days after the adoption of this ordinance, the City Clerk is authorized and directed to mail to the owner of each housing unit in the Greensboro Condominium Owners Association Housing Improvement Area: a summary of this ordinance; notice that owners subject to the proposed Housing Improvement Fee have a right to veto this ordinance if owners of at least 45 percent of the housing units within the Greensboro Condominium Owners Association Housing Improvement Area file a written objection with the City Clerk before the effective date of this ordinance; and notice that a copy of this ordinance is on file with the City Clerk for public inspection. Section 9. Amendment. 9.01. This ordinance may be amended by the Council upon compliance with the public hearing and notice requirements set forth in Section 428A.13 of the Act. Section 10. Effective Date. 10.1. This ordinance shall be effective 45 days after adoption hereof. Read, approved and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park on November 21, 2011. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council November 21, 2011 City Manager Mayor Attest: Approved as to form and execution: City Clerk City Attorney City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 6b) Subject: Public Hearing on Greensboro Condominium Association’s Housing Improvement Area (HIA)Page 22 EXHIBIT A TO ORDINANCE NO. ____-11 Legal description City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 6b) Subject: Public Hearing on Greensboro Condominium Association’s Housing Improvement Area (HIA)Page 23 394395v1 MNI SA140-110 MEMORANDUM To: Members of the City Council, St. Louis Park, MN From: Kathy Larsen, Housing Programs Coordinator Re: Greensboro Housing Improvement Area Date: November __, 2011 Greensboro Condominium Association (“Greensboro”) has submitted a petition to the City of St. Louis Park (the “City”) requesting the establishment of a Housing Improvement Area (“HIA”) pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 428A (the “Act”) in order to finance several improvements to its buildings. Greensboro has submitted a Owner Cost Allocation powerpoint presentation (the “Presentation”) containing its proposed method of imposing fees on owners of the Greensboro units to pay for the improvements. Pursuant to Section 428A.14, subdivision 1 of the Act, the City Council must review the proposed method of imposing fees for HIA improvements. If the fee is imposed “on a basis other than the tax capacity or square footage of the housing unit, the council must make a finding that the alternative basis for the fee is more fair and reasonable.” This memorandum describes Greensboro’s reasoning behind the proposed fees, and provides a factual basis for the City Council’s use in making its required findings. A. Condominium Documents and Laws Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 515 (the “Condominium Act”) provides that all physical portions of a condominium property shall be designated as “Common Areas and Facilities” (all portions of the property other than the individual apartments), “Limited Common Areas and Facilities” (a portion of the Common Areas and Facilities designated by the condominium declaration as reserved for the exclusive use of one apartment), or “Apartments” (a portion of the property with designated boundaries and intended for separate ownership and occupancy). Pursuant to Section 515.11 of the Condominium Act, the declaration of a condominium shall govern the precise definitions of Common Areas and Facilities and Limited Common Areas and Facilities for that condominium. The Amended and Restated Declaration of Greensboro Condominium (the “Declaration”) defines the various elements making up the Greensboro physical structure and governs who is responsible for maintenance and replacement of these elements. According to the Declaration and consistent with the Condominium Act, all portions of Greensboro except the Apartments are considered “Common Areas and Facilities”, and the Greensboro Association is responsible for the maintenance, repair and replacement of these areas. The Declaration separately defines “Limited Common Areas and Facilities” City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 6b) Subject: Public Hearing on Greensboro Condominium Association’s Housing Improvement Area (HIA)Page 24 394395v1 MNI SA140-110 as “those Common Areas and Facilities such as designated garages, balconies, patios and storage compartments […] which are assigned and reserved for the exclusive use of Owners and/or Occupants of individual Apartments.” Because these elements are a subset of the Common Areas and Facilities, Greensboro is responsible for the maintenance, repair and replacement of these areas as well. B. Proposed Greensboro Fees The improvements contemplated by Greensboro include site work including asphalt pavement, utility work, and grading (referred to in the Presentation as the “Common-Common Cost Items”); replacement of siding, trim, and common windows/doors (the “Building-Common Cost Items”); and repair and painting of individual apartments’ balconies, along with repair and renovation of individual garages and storage lockers (the “Limited Common/Unit Cost Items”). Greensboro contains both townhomes and apartment buildings with differing construction features and amenities. Greensboro proposes to set its fees based on two tiers, and further allocates the cost of certain Improvements in the first tier according to the type of building requiring the Improvements. Within the first tier of costs, Greensboro determined that the Common-Common Cost Items will benefit all apartments in the same way, regardless of building type. Therefore, this category of Improvements is allocated to each apartment based on the total cost of the Common-Common Cost Items, multiplied by the percentage of ownership in Greensboro allocated to that apartment. For the Building-Common Cost Items, Greensboro first determined the cost of the Building-Common Cost Items allocable to each building, then allocated the per-building cost to each apartment in that type of building in the same percentage of ownership manner as the Common-Common Cost Items. The second tier of costs allocates an additional fee for Limited-Common/Unit Cost Items to a given apartment based on the actual cost of Improvements to the Limited Common Areas and Facilities serving that apartment. Greensboro’s rationale for basing the fee for the Limited-Common/Unit Cost Items on actual cost rather than ownership percentage is based on fairness. The Limited- Common/Unit Cost Items include improvements to garages, balconies, and storage units. Many of the apartments at Greensboro lack one or more of these amenities. If the owner of an apartment with a balcony pays the same amount as a second apartment owner with the same ownership percentage but without a balcony, the second owner will effectively subsidize the first owner’s balcony repairs without gaining any benefit from those repairs. Greensboro therefore asserts that it is more equitable to assess individual apartment owners for the actual cost of improvements to amenities that benefit only their apartment, rather than to base this portion of the fee on ownership percentage. City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 6b) Subject: Public Hearing on Greensboro Condominium Association’s Housing Improvement Area (HIA)Page 25 394395v1 MNI SA140-110 C. Comparison to Tax Capacity and Square Footage Basis 1. The cost allocation proposed by Greensboro for both the Common- Common Cost Items and the Building-Common Cost Items is based on each apartment’s percentage of ownership. The Greensboro ownership percentages are, in turn, based on the square footage of each apartment. Therefore, the cost allocation for these categories of Improvements is based on square footage rather than an alternative basis, and the Council may make the finding that this fee is fair and reasonable per se. 2. The cost allocation for the Limited-Common/Unit Cost Items is not based on tax capacity or square footage, but rather on actual cost of these Improvements to each individual apartment. The Condominium Act and the Declaration both provide that individual owners may be charged for the repair and maintenance of Limited Common Areas and Facilities, so this allocation meets the relevant legal requirements. In addition, the Council could rationally make a finding that basing the fee for the Limited- Common/Unit Cost Items on the actual cost to each apartment is more fair and reasonable than basing this fee on tax capacity or square footage. Greensboro has provided evidence that basing the fee for Limited Common Areas and Facilities on percentage of ownership would financially penalize the owners of some units while allowing others to pay less than the actual cost of their improvements. Likewise, basing the fee on tax capacity fails to account for the whether individual apartments include balconies or garages, leading to the same potentially skewed result. Basing the cost allocation for the Limited- Common/Unit Cost Items on the actual cost of these Improvements for each apartment is the most financially equitable method of ensuring that Improvements benefiting a single apartment will not be subsidized by other, non-benefiting apartments. City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 6b) Subject: Public Hearing on Greensboro Condominium Association’s Housing Improvement Area (HIA)Page 26 City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 6b) Subject: Public Hearing on Greensboro Condominium Association’s Housing Improvement Area (HIA)Page 27 City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 6b) Subject: Public Hearing on Greensboro Condominium Association’s Housing Improvement Area (HIA)Page 28 City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 6b) Subject: Public Hearing on Greensboro Condominium Association’s Housing Improvement Area (HIA)Page 29 City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 6b) Subject: Public Hearing on Greensboro Condominium Association’s Housing Improvement Area (HIA)Page 30 City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 6b) Subject: Public Hearing on Greensboro Condominium Association’s Housing Improvement Area (HIA)Page 31 City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 6b) Subject: Public Hearing on Greensboro Condominium Association’s Housing Improvement Area (HIA)Page 32 City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 6b) Subject: Public Hearing on Greensboro Condominium Association’s Housing Improvement Area (HIA)Page 33 City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 6b) Subject: Public Hearing on Greensboro Condominium Association’s Housing Improvement Area (HIA)Page 34 City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 6b) Subject: Public Hearing on Greensboro Condominium Association’s Housing Improvement Area (HIA)Page 35 City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 6b) Subject: Public Hearing on Greensboro Condominium Association’s Housing Improvement Area (HIA)Page 36 City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 6b) Subject: Public Hearing on Greensboro Condominium Association’s Housing Improvement Area (HIA)Page 37 City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 6b) Subject: Public Hearing on Greensboro Condominium Association’s Housing Improvement Area (HIA)Page 38 City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 6b) Subject: Public Hearing on Greensboro Condominium Association’s Housing Improvement Area (HIA)Page 39 City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 6b) Subject: Public Hearing on Greensboro Condominium Association’s Housing Improvement Area (HIA)Page 40 City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 6b) Subject: Public Hearing on Greensboro Condominium Association’s Housing Improvement Area (HIA)Page 41 Summary of Established Housing Improvement Areas (2011)AssociationNumber of UnitsLoan AmountMedian EMV Year EstablishedAvg Fee/UnitInterest RateTerm YearsExpirationSource of Funds# of Hardship Deferrals # Prepayments Outstanding Balance 12/31/2010Cedar Trails Condominium Association 280 $1,366,000 $112.80 2002 $4,878 6.30% 10 2012 HRF 0 50 $128,811 Sungate One Association 20 $183,884 $131,700 2006 $9,194 5.90% 10 2016 HRF 0 2 $64,394 Wolfe Lake Condominiums 130 $1,238,000 $127,300 2007 $9,754 5.85% 15 2022 HRF 0 10 $828,561 Westmoreland Hills Owners Association 72 $1,026,125 $101,400 2008 $14,250 5.85% 15 2023 HRF 7 12 $843,172 TOTALS 742 $7,749,204 $4,968,344 $3,103,406 Sunset Ridge Condominium Association 240 $3,935,195 2009 $16,625 5.60%$118,500 20 2031 Bonds 6 50 City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 6b) Subject: Public Hearing on Greensboro Condominium Association’s Housing Improvement Area (HIA)Page 42 CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK HOUSING IMPROVEMENT AREA POLICY 1. PURPOSE 1.01 The purpose of this policy is to establish the City's position relating to the use of Housing Improvement Area (HIA) financing for private housing improvements. This policy shall be used as a guide in processing and reviewing applications requesting HIA financing. 1.02 The City shall have the option of amending or waiving sections of this policy when determined necessary or appropriate. 2. AUTHORITY 2.01 The City of St. Louis Park has the authority to establish HIAs under 1994 Minnesota Laws, Chapter 587, Article 9, Section 22 through 3 1, and extended in 2000, M.S. 428A.21 2.02 Within a HIA, the City has the authority to: A. Make housing improvements B. Levy fees and assessments C. Issue bonds to pay for improvements 2.03 The City Council has the authority to review each HIA petition, which includes scope of improvements, association’s finances, long term financial plan, and membership support. 3. ELIGIBLE USES OF HIA FINANCING 3.01 As a matter of adopted policy, the City of St. Louis Park will consider using HIA financing to assist private property owners only in those circumstances in which the proposed private projects address one or more of the following goals: A. To promote neighborhood stabilization and revitalization by the removal of blight and/or the upgrading of the existing housing stock in a neighborhood. B. To correct housing or building code violations as identified by the City Building Official. C. To maintain or obtain FHA mortgage eligibility for a particular condominium or townhome association or single family home within the designated HIA. D. To increase or prevent the loss of the tax base of the City in order to ensure the long-term ability of the City to provide adequate services for its residents. City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 6b) Subject: Public Hearing on Greensboro Condominium Association’s Housing Improvement Area (HIA)Page 43 E. To stabilize or increase the owner-occupancy level within a neighborhood or association. F. To meet other uses of public policy, as adopted by the City of St. Louis Park from time to time, including promotion of quality urban design, quality architectural design, energy conservation, decreasing the capital and operating costs of local government, etc. 4. HIA APPROVAL CRITERIA 4.01 All HIA financed through the City of St. Louis Park should meet the following minimum approval criteria. However, it should not be presumed that a project meeting these criteria would automatically be approved. Meeting these criteria creates no contractual rights on the part of any association. A. The project must be in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinances, or required changes to the Plan and Ordinances must be under active consideration by the City at the time of approval. B. The HIA financing shall be provided within applicable state legislative restrictions, debt limit guidelines, and other appropriate financial requirements and policies. C. The project should meet one or more of the above adopted HIA Goals of the City of St. Louis Park. D. The term of the HIA should be the shortest term possible while still making the annual fee affordable to the association members. The term of any bonds or other debt incurred for the area should mature in 20 years or less. E. The association in a HIA should provide adequate financial guarantees to ensure the repayment of the HIA financing and the performance of the administrative requirements of the development agreement. Financial guarantees may include, but are not limited to the pledge of the association's assets including reserves, operating funds and/or property. F. The proposed project, including the use of HIA financing, should be supported by a majority of the owners within the association. The association should include the results of a membership vote along with the petitions to create the area. G. The Association must have adopted a financial plan that provides for the Association to finance maintenance and operation of the common elements within the Association and a long-range plan to conduct and finance capital improvements therein, which does not rely upon the subsequent use of the HIA tool. City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 6b) Subject: Public Hearing on Greensboro Condominium Association’s Housing Improvement Area (HIA)Page 44 H. HIA financial assistance is last resort financing and should not be provided to projects that have the financial feasibility to proceed without the benefit of HIA financing. Evidence that the association has sought other financing for the project should be provided and should include an explanation and verification that an assessment by the association is not feasible along with letters from private lenders or other evidence indicating a lack of financing options. I. The homeowner's association must be willing to enter into a development agreement, which may include, but is not limited to, the following terms: establishment of a reserve fund staffing requirements annual reporting requirements conditions of disbursement required dues increases notification to new owners of levied fees J. The improvements financed through the HIA should primarily be exterior improvements and other improvements integral to the operation of the project, e.g. boilers. In the case of a homeowner's association, the improvements should be restricted to common areas. The improvements must be of a permanent nature. The association must have a third party conduct a facility needs assessment to determine and prioritize the scope of improvements. K. HIA financing should not be provided to those projects that fail to meet good public policy criteria as determined by the Council, including: poor project quality; projects that are not in accord with the Comprehensive Plan, zoning, redevelopment plans, and the City policies; projects that provide no significant improvement to the neighborhood and/or the City; and projects that do not provide a significant increase in the tax base and/or prevent the loss of tax base. L. The financial structure of the project should receive a favorable review by the City's Financial Advisor and Bond Counsel. The review will include a review of performance and level of outstanding debt of previous HIAs. M. The average market value of units in the association should not exceed the maximum home purchase price for existing homes under the State’s first time homebuyer program. (In 2001, the metro amount is $175,591) N. The association is to submit an application along with application fee as set from time to time by resolution of the City Council. Adopted by the City of St. Louis Park on the 16th day of July 2001. City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 6b) Subject: Public Hearing on Greensboro Condominium Association’s Housing Improvement Area (HIA)Page 45 Meeting Date: November 21, 2011 Agenda Item #: 8a Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance Presentation Other: EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other: Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other: TITLE: Fretham Twelfth Addition – Preliminary Plat RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to adopt a resolution approving the Preliminary Plat for six single-family lots known as Fretham Twelfth Addition. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the Preliminary Plat meet the City Code requirements and goals of the Comprehensive Plan? Does the City Council wish to approve the Preliminary Plat? BACKGROUND: Comprehensive Plan: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1 Single Family Residential Description of Request: Requested is a Preliminary Plat to allow for the subdivision of two lots at 8910 and 8920 Minnetonka Boulevard into six (6) new lots. Four lots would be serviced by Ensign Blvd, and two lots would share an access to Minnetonka Blvd. Background: The proposed subdivision involves two existing lots of 53,748 square feet and 22,691 square feet for a total of 76,435 square feet (approximately 1.75 acres). The lots would be subdivided into six lots ranging from 9,356 square feet to 14,480 square feet in size. Each proposed lot exceeds the minimum lot size of 9,000 square feet and the minimum lot width requirements in the R-1 Zoning District. The minimum lot width requirement in the R-1 Zoning District is 75 feet measured at the front yard setback; for corner lots, the minimum width is 85 feet. The lots meet, or exceed, the minimum lot width requirements. Location: The proposed subdivision is located on the south shore of Cobble Crest Lake and north of Minnetonka Boulevard in the western part of the City, and is fully within the Cobblecrest neighborhood. It is located just west of three subdivisions approved in 2007 and 2010 known as “Fretham 9th Addition”, “Westling Estates”, and “Eldridge 1st Addition”. The Cobblecrest neighborhood is primarily single family homes, built around the 1950s. City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 8a) Page 2 Subject: Fretham Twelfth Addition – Preliminary Plat Subdivision Analysis The proposed subdivision meets the general conditions of the Zoning Ordinance related to minimum required lot size (9,000 square feet), and minimum required lot width (75 feet for interior lot, 85 feet for corner lots). Other issues addressed in the application are reviewed below. Lot Lot Area Lot Width Lot Depth 1 14,480 sf 75 ft 145 ft 2 14,279 sf 75 ft 205 ft 3 12,595 sf 75 ft 170 ft 4 11,762 sf 85 ft 139 ft 5 9,356 sf 75 ft 128 ft 6 11,067 sf 123 ft 142 ft Street Access: Lots 1-3 are proposed to front on Ensign Ave S. Lots 4-6 are proposed to front on Minnetonka Blvd. Hennepin County has requested, however, that the driveway access to Lot 4 come off of Ensign Ave S, and that Lots 5and 6 have a shared access in a similar manner as was done for Lots 1 and 2 of Westling Estates. The proposed Preliminary Plat has incorporated this request. Topography & Shape: The property is mostly flat, except a steep 29 foot slope along the shore of Cobble Crest Lake. Under Section 36-157 of the Subdivision Ordinance, this slope should be considered an environmentally sensitive area. Section 36-157(Protected Areas) of the City Code states that subdivisions that include environmentally sensitive land, such as wetlands, steep slopes, and other areas shall clearly require all necessary measures of protection to ensure against adverse environmental impacts. Protection can include measures such as easements, large lots, building restrictions, etc. The slope is heavily vegetated with trees and underbrush. The proposed subdivision was designed to not disturb the slope and vegetation, so grading for construction of a new home or any aspect of the subdivision including the storm water drainage system will not occur within the slope. City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 8a) Page 3 Subject: Fretham Twelfth Addition – Preliminary Plat As shown in the exhibit below, the location of the proposed home on Lot 1 will not impact the slope, and is located a distance from the slope and lake in a manner that is consistent with the existing homes along the lake. Street Dedication: Hennepin County requested a dedication of seven feet of road right-of-way along Minnetonka Blvd. This is consistent with other subdivisions along Minnetonka Blvd. The proposed Preliminary Plat has incorporated this request. Sidewalk: The Subdivision Ordinance requires the construction of a sidewalk along all public streets with access for all new homes. The requirement, which calls for a five-foot wide section of sidewalk, allows for the sidewalk to be constructed in the right-of-way. In this case, the sidewalk is proposed to be located on the east side of Ensign Ave S and on the north side of Minnetonka Ave. The proposed Preliminary Plat is in compliance with this section. Lot Shape & Building placement: The Subdivision Ordinance includes recommendations for lot dimension and shape. It also requires that for any lots that are not rectangular in shape, the developer must show that a house can reasonably be constructed on it. 1. Lots 3, 4 & 5 are rectangular in shape. 2. Lots 1, 2 & 6 are not rectangular in shape due to the odd shape of the parcels being subdivided. For each of these lots, the developer has shown in the attached exhibits that a house at least equal in size to those of the neighborhood can be constructed on each of them. These lots are not rectangular for the following reasons: Existing house, not included in subdivision Existing house, to be removed Existing house, not included in subdivision Possible location of new house City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 8a) Page 4 Subject: Fretham Twelfth Addition – Preliminary Plat a. Lot 1 is at the end of a cul-de-sac, and therefore has a slightly pie shape typical of a cul- de-sac lot. b. Lot 2 would be rectangular in shape except that the back property line is not parallel to the front due to the odd shape of the existing parcel. Also, additional land was added to the lot to create a second lake-front lot. c. Lot 6 would also be rectangular in shape except that the east property line is not at right- angle to Minnetonka Blvd. This is the result of the shape of the existing parcel. The applicant has included building pads for each site showing how the setback requirements of the R-1 Zoning District could be met. The proposed homes would be approximately 3,000 square feet, with a two or three car attached garage. Tree Replacement & Landscaping: Tree Removal Summary There are 33 significant trees totaling 506 caliper inches on the site. 12 significant trees will be removed totaling 212 caliper inches. 70 caliper inches of trees are required by city code to be replanted. The existing lot has trees scattered throughout the site. Concentrations of trees and scrub brush exist along Minnetonka Blvd and along the south shore of Cobble Crest Lake. There are 33 significant trees on the site, comprising a total of 506 caliper inches of total trees. The applicant intends to remove 12 significant trees, adding up to a total of 212 caliper inches. Using the Zoning Ordinance formula for tree replacement, a total of 70 caliper inches of significant trees must be replaced. Trees and scrub brush will not be removed from the slope along the south side of Cobble Crest Lake. The applicant is proposing to plant the required trees in the following manner: • Along Minnetonka Blvd to provide screening from the road. • One boulevard tree will be planted in the front yard of each lot as required by city code. • Along the east property line to provide screening between the subdivision and the existing lot to the east and to provide vegetation around the storm water pond to enhance its aesthetics. The tree replacement requirements are shown to be met. A financial guarantee will be submitted to guarantee compliance. Ensign Avenue: Existing conditions on Ensign Ave: The existing Ensign Ave right-of-way is 60 feet wide, which meets the 60 foot minimum required for residential streets with parking on both sides. The road surface of Ensign Ave is 27 feet wide, which is two feet short of the 29 feet minimum required for a residential street with parking on one side. There are currently no parking restrictions on Ensign Ave. There are currently seven lots on Ensign Ave. Five of the lots have houses with driveways that extend onto Ensign Ave. One lot has a house with a driveway that extends to Minnetonka Blvd, which could be easily modified to extend to Ensign Ave. The last lot does not have a house on it, but there is nothing known about the lot to prevent one from being constructed with a driveway that would extend onto Ensign Ave. The proposed preliminary plat will add two City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 8a) Page 5 Subject: Fretham Twelfth Addition – Preliminary Plat additional lots on Ensign Ave, and it proposes to remove the existing home that has the driveway that extends to Minnetonka Blvd. Each of the proposed lots will have a driveway that extends to Ensign Ave. Results of proposed preliminary plat: The result of the proposed plat is that there will be two additional lots on Ensign Ave, and four additional driveways. The City Fire and Engineering Departments reviewed the impact the proposed subdivision may have on Ensign Ave, and determined that the street and cul-de-sac, while smaller than the city standard, is sufficient to handle the additional two lots. Drainage and Utility Easements: The applicant has included the easements required by the Subdivision Ordinance. The new easements allow for the placement of drainage and utilities between the properties. As required, the easements are provided with 10’ for all exterior lot lines, and 5’ for all interior lot lines. Additional easements are located to protect the proposed stormwater improvements. Staff is also requesting additional drainage and utility easement to protect the slope along Cobble Crest Lake and the existing overhead power lines along the south shore of Cobble Crest Lake. The proposed Preliminary Plat does not show the additional easement over the slope. The easement is listed as a condition of approval, and can be added to the final plat without impacting buildable area of the lots. Utilities: The utility plan was reviewed and approved by the City Engineering Department with conditions. The Engineering Department concluded that existing utilities along Minnetonka Blvd and Ensign Ave are adequate to service the proposed subdivision. Stubs off of existing sanitary sewer and water lines will be added as needed to provide services to the new homes. The stormwater pond will outlet by an underground pipe to an existing manhole located in the Ensign Ave S cul-de-sac. As requested by the Engineering Department, the manhole structure will be upgraded by the applicant to accommodate the additional pipe and water. All electrical and phone connections servicing the new homes will be placed underground. Stormwater Management: A dry pond will be constructed across portions of the back yard of lots 2, 3, 5 and 6. The pond will have an average depth of approximately one foot, and will be planted with wetland tolerant grasses and trees. The pond will be protected by a drainage and utility easement to prevent it from being altered or built on. The limits of the pond easements are shown on the preliminary plat. The dimensions and depth of the pond are shown on the grading plan. Both plans are attached to the report for your review. The City Engineering Department reviewed the stormwater management plan, and determined that it complies with the City regulations. The review indicates that the proposed Preliminary Plat: 1. Will meet the Minnehaha Creek Watershed’s requirements. 2. Does not increase the amount of runoff from the property. 3. Meets the 100 year and 10 year discharge limits. City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 8a) Page 6 Subject: Fretham Twelfth Addition – Preliminary Plat Minnehaha Creek Watershed District: Steve Christopher, Regulatory Program Manager for the Watershed District submitted written confirmation that the proposed Preliminary Plat will meet their requirements. Permits from the Watershed District will be required prior to beginning construction on the site. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources: The Department of Natural Resources (DNR) has jurisdiction over Cobble Crest Lake, so plans were submitted to them for review. They responded that no comments or revisions are required. Park Dedication / Trail dedication: Based on the goals found in the Comprehensive Plan, no new parks are planned for this area of the City; therefore, the applicant will be required to make a payment in lieu of park dedication. The park dedication ($1,500 per lot) and trail dedication ($225 per lot) payments, due before the City releases the final plat, are as follows: • Park dedication: $6,000 • Trail dedication: $900 Public Process: Neighborhood Meeting: The applicant held a neighborhood meeting on Tuesday, September 13, 2011. Planning Commission: The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on September 21, 2011. Comments were received from the public. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the Preliminary Plat on a 4-0 vote. Excerpts of the Planning Commission minutes are attached for your review. Comments were received at the Neighborhood Meeting on Tuesday, September 13th. The comments are listed below along with recommendations resulting from the meeting. 1. Water quality pertaining to runoff to Cobble Crest Lake. Runoff should be treated and cleaned to prevent trash and silt from reaching the lake. The water will be treated in a pond located on the back side of lots 2, 3, 5 and 6. The pond will outlet into the public storm water system located in Ensign Ave S after treatment. 2. The slope to Cobble Crest Lake should be untouched. The slope is steep and vegetated. It should not be altered. The slope will not be altered, and the existing trees and brush will remain untouched. The slope will be protected by a construction fence during grading of the development and construction of the new homes. 3. The loss of trees. A 33 inch oak is proposed to be removed on Lot 1, and trees along Minnetonka Blvd are proposed to be removed. The trees along Minnetonka Blvd provide a nice screen. These trees are proposed to be removed. The oak is located too close to the proposed building pad. The building pad cannot be moved further back from the oak without impacting the slope to Cobble Crest Lake. Therefore, it was decided to remove the oak. City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 8a) Page 7 Subject: Fretham Twelfth Addition – Preliminary Plat 4. The proposal has too many lots. The proposal is too dense, and will resemble the previous subdivision at Boone Ave and Minnetonka Blvd. The proposed subdivision has six lots all over the 9,000 square foot minimum lot size required in the R-1 zoning district. The lots range from 9,356 square feet to 14,480 square feet, with an average size of 12,256 square feet. The subdivision at Boone Ave has three lots with frontage on three roads. The lots are 9,700, 9,834 and 8,238 square feet in area. A variance was granted to Lot 1 to go from the 9,000 square feet minimum lot area down to 8,238 square feet. A second variance was granted to Lot 3 for lot width to go from the required minimum of 85 feet to 73 feet. As the lot size and width numbers above reveal, the Boone Ave subdivision is more compact than the proposed subdivision. The lots proposed in this subdivision are on average 25% bigger than those on Boone Ave. Also, there are no variances proposed for this subdivision. 5. One lot should be removed so Lot 4, the corner lot, can truly face Ensign Blvd like lots 1-3 do, instead of fronting on Minnetonka Blvd as proposed. Lot 4 is 11,740 square feet in area. This is big enough so that a house can be placed on it to meet the 30 foot front yard setback on both Ensign Ave and Minnetonka Blvd, and still have sufficient open space on the north side of the house. 6. If the house on Lot 4 faces Ensign Ave, then this would result in the property having a small “back yard” to the east of the house, and a large “side yard” to the north of the house. This is true, however this configuration is not uncommon for a corner lot. When given a choice, the home owner will typically desire to have the driveway access off the less traveled road. As the illustration shows, even though the drive- way and front of the house faces Ensign Ave, the layout is not unreasonable. City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 8a) Page 8 Subject: Fretham Twelfth Addition – Preliminary Plat 7. There are too many lots facing Ensign Ave. The lot widths of the proposed lots should resemble the existing wider lots on the west side of Ensign Ave. There are currently 4 lots on the west side of Ensign Ave, the subdivision proposes four additional lots on the east side. The following table compares the lot widths of the existing lots on the west side of Ensign Ave and the lot widths proposed by this subdivision. Existing lots on west side Proposed lots Address Lot Width Lot Width Lot # 2932 Ensign Ave 66 feet 75 feet 1 2950 Ensign Ave 95 feet 75 feet 2 2962 Ensign Ave 100 feet 75 feet 3 2980 Ensign Ave 146 feet 140 feet 4 Total: 407 feet 365 feet The west side of Ensign Ave has slightly more frontage on the road due to the bulb of the cul-de-sac which is entirely slanted to the west side, and due to the fact that Minnetonka Blvd is slightly askew to Ensign Ave. The proposed lots meet the minimum lot width requirements, and are comparable in size to lots in the neighborhood. Staff believes the proposed lots fit within the Character of the Cobblecrest Neighborhood. 8. The house on Lot 1 should receive a front yard variance to be located closer to the street than code allows so it will line up better with the existing house to the west. The house on Lot 1 could be moved slightly forward to transition from the existing house to the west which has a 17 foot front setback to the proposed house on Lot 2 which will be setback 30 feet. As the exhibit shows, none of the existing houses around the cul-de-sac meet the required 30 foot setback. Reducing the front setback, however, results in a more garage-forward design because the lot gets narrower as the house is brought forward. The impact on the existing house is minimal as the new house will be adjacent to the neighbor’s garage, and will not impede any existing views from the house. A variance was not requested by the applicant; therefore, the plan is to require the 30 foot front setback. 9. The existing house to the west of Lot 1 is approximately 4.5 feet from the side property line. Could the proposed house on Lot 1 be moved further from the side lot line than the code minimum of six feet to provide more space between the two houses? If the proposed house was built at the six foot setback line, then there would be 10.5 feet between the two houses. If both houses met the six foot side setback, then there would be 12 feet between the two houses. A condition of approval could be placed on Lot 1 requiring the house to be at least City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 8a) Page 9 Subject: Fretham Twelfth Addition – Preliminary Plat 7.5 feet from the side property line. This would restore the 12 foot distance between the two houses. The lot line would stay as proposed, so the existing house would still be 4.5 feet from the lot line, but the proposed house would be 7.5 feet from the lot line. The Planning Commission included this additional setback as a condition in their recommendation. 10. The overhead power lines along Cobble Crest Lake are within arm’s reach, and should be raised. A condition of approval was included stating that the power line be reviewed by Xcel as a condition of the plat, and raised as needed. Recommendation: The Preliminary Plat meets the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance and also meets the Zoning Ordinance requirements for the R-1 Zoning District. Therefore, the Planning Commission and staff recommends adoption of the attached Resolution approving the Preliminary Plat for six single-family lots known as Fretham Twelfth Addition. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: None. VISION CONSIDERATION: The proposed subdivision meets the vision goals for diverse housing options within the community, and will add to the City’s stock of “move up” housing, based on goals adopted by the City Council. Attachments: Proposed Resolution Location Map Preliminary Plat Excerpts from Planning Commission Minutes Prepared by: Gary Morrison, Assistant Zoning Administrator Reviewed by: Meg McMonigal, Planning and Zoning Supervisor Kevin Locke, Community Development Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 8a) Page 10 Subject: Fretham Twelfth Addition – Preliminary Plat RESOLUTION NO. 11-____ RESOLUTION GIVING APPROVAL FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT OF FRETHAM TWELFTH ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of St. Louis Park: Findings 1. Lakewest Development Company, LLC, owner and subdivider of the land proposed to be platted as Fretham Twelfth Addition has submitted an application for approval of preliminary plat of said subdivision in the manner required for platting of land under the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code, and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder. 2. The proposed preliminary plat for six single-family lots has been found to be in all respects consistent with the City Plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and the ordinances of the City of St. Louis Park. 3. The proposed plat is situated upon the following described lands in Hennepin County, Minnesota, to-wit: That part of Section 18, Township 117, Range 21, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows: commencing on the North line of said Section 18, at a point 920.53 feet West of the North Quarter corner of said section; thence deflecting left 47 degrees, 11 minutes a distance of 54.55 feet in the Southwesterly direction, thence deflecting left 82 degrees a distance of 288.36 feet to the Northerly line of Minnetonka Boulevard as the same is laid out and traveled; thence deflecting right 120 degrees 05 minutes a distance of 109.79 feet along said Northerly line; thence deflecting right 59 degrees 55 minutes a distance of 362.49 feet to a point in the North line of said Section 18; thence deflecting to the right 120 degrees 11 minutes a distance of 192.30 feet along said North line to the point of beginning. Also that part of Section 7, Township 117, Range 21, described as follows: Commencing on the South line of said Section 7 at a point 920.53 feet West of the South Quarter corner of said section; thence deflecting right 132 degrees 49 minutes a distance of 97.33 feet in the Northeasterly direction; thence deflecting left 129 degrees 13 minutes a distance of 72.50 feet; thence deflecting right 36 degrees 24 minutes a distance of 60 feet; thence deflecting left 6 degrees 03 minutes a distance of 170 feet; thence deflecting left 73 degrees 08 minutes a distance of 131.82 feet; thence deflecting left 90 degrees a distance of 162.72 feet to the South line of said Section 7; thence deflecting left 50 degrees 49 minutes along said South line 192.30 feet to the point of beginning, which lies Southeasterly of the Southeasterly boundary line of the following described tract: All that part of Section 7, and Section 18, Township 117, Range 21, described as follows: Commencing on the South line of said Section 7, and Section 18, Township 117, Range 21, described as follows: Commencing on the South line of said Section 7 at a point 920.53 feet West of the South Quarter corner of said City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 8a) Page 11 Subject: Fretham Twelfth Addition – Preliminary Plat section; thence deflecting right 132 degrees and 49 minutes a distance of 97.33 feet in a Northeasterly direction; thence deflecting left 129 degrees and 13 minutes a distance of 72.50 feet; thence deflecting right 36 degrees and 24 minutes a distance of 60.0 feet; thence deflecting left 6 degrees and 03 minutes a distance of 51.85 feet; which is the actual point of beginning of the land to be described, thence continuing Northwesterly on last described line 118.15 feet; thence deflecting left 73 degrees and 08 minutes a distance of 131.82 feet; thence deflecting left 90 degrees a distance of 162.72 feet to the South line of said Section 7; thence continuing in Southeasterly direction along last described line 12.0 feet; thence Northeasterly in a straight line 177.5 feet more or less to the point of beginning. and That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (NE ¼ of NW ¼) of Section 18, Township 117, Range 21, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at a point in the North line of Minnetonka Boulevard as the same is located and travelled across said NE ¼ of NW ¼, which point is 388.7 feet West at right angles from the East line of the Southwest Quarter of Section, Township 117, Range 21, produced South; thence Southwesterly along said Northerly line of Minnetonka Boulevard 509.79 feet to point of beginning of the parcel of land to be described; thence Southwesterly along said North line continued 181.16 feet; thence right 98 degrees 08 minutes parallel to the West line of said NE ¼ of NW ¼ of said Section 18, a distance of 253.2 feet; thence in a direct line 289.50 feet to point of beginning; said direct line making an angle of 59 degrees 55 minutes with the Northerly line of Minnetonka Boulevard. Conclusion The proposed preliminary plat of Fretham Twelfth Addition is hereby approved and accepted by the City as being in accord and conformity with all ordinances, City plans and regulations of the City of St. Louis Park and the laws of the State of Minnesota, subject to the following conditions: 1. The application for final plat shall meet the following conditions: a. Plans shall include a final landscape plan for all tree planting and tree preservation planned for the site. b. All conditions for stormwater management shall be met. The pond shall be shaped in a natural manner, and include landscaping. c. The stormwater catch basin located at the north end of the Ensign Ave S cul-de- sac shall be replaced by the applicant as required by the City Engineering Department. 2. Prior to starting any site work, the following conditions shall be met: a. Assent form and official exhibits must be signed by the applicant and owner. b. All necessary permits must be obtained. c. All Minnehaha Creek Watershed Management permits must be issued. d. A minimum three foot tall orange construction fence be installed along the top edge of the slope to protect the slope and vegetation. The fence shall remain City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 8a) Page 12 Subject: Fretham Twelfth Addition – Preliminary Plat during the construction of the subdivision, and may be removed from a lot after a house is constructed on the lot. 3. The applicant shall comply with the following conditions during construction: a. All City noise ordinances shall be complied with, including that there be no construction activity between the hours of 10:00 PM and 7:00 AM. b. Loud equipment shall be kept as far as possible from residences at all times. c. The site shall be kept free of dust and debris that could blow onto neighboring properties. d. Public streets shall be maintained free of dirt and shall be cleaned as necessary. e. The Zoning Administrator may impose additional conditions if it becomes necessary in order to mitigate the impact of excavation on surrounding properties. 4. Lot 1 shall have a minimum side yard setback of 7.5 feet along the west property line. 5. Lot 1 shall not have a walk-out basement. 6. Lot 4 shall have a driveway access to Ensign Ave S only. 7. Lots 5 and 6 shall have a shared driveway access. 8. Lots 1 and 2 shall have a drainage and utility easement that extends over the entire slope, and encompasses the existing power line. 9. The pond shall be planted with water tolerant grasses, shrubs and trees. 10. All electrical and phone utilities servicing the new homes are to be placed underground. 11. Sidewalks shall be installed along Minnetonka Blvd and Ensign Ave per City Engineer’s requirements. 12. Park dedication fees of $6,000 must be received by the City prior to filing a final plat. 13. Trail dedication fees of $900 must be received by the City prior to filing a final plat. 14. Applicant shall submit financial security in the form of a cash escrow or letter of credit in the amount of $1,000 to insure that a signed Mylar copy of the final plat is provided to the City. 15. Applicant shall submit a financial security in the form of cash escrow or letter of credit in the amount of 125% of the costs of tree replacement, public improvements, landscaping, repair/cleaning of public streets and utilities, and to guarantee the provision of as-built drawings for all new public infrastructure to the City. 16. The applicant shall pay an administrative fine of $750 per violation of any condition of this approval. 17. Developer or owner shall pay an administrative fee of $750 per violation of any condition of this approval. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by City Council November 21, 2011 City Manager Mayor Attest: City Clerk City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 8a) Page 13 Subject: Fretham Twelfth Addition – Preliminary Plat Location Map City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 8a) Subject: Fretham Twelfth Addition – Preliminary Plat Page 14 City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 8a) Subject: Fretham Twelfth Addition – Preliminary Plat Page 15 City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 8a) Subject: Fretham Twelfth Addition – Preliminary Plat Page 16 City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 8a) Subject: Fretham Twelfth Addition – Preliminary Plat Page 17 City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 8a) Subject: Fretham Twelfth Addition – Preliminary Plat Page 18 City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 8a) Subject: Fretham Twelfth Addition – Preliminary Plat Page 19 City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 8a) Subject: Fretham Twelfth Addition – Preliminary Plat Page 20 EXCERPTS OF OFFICIAL MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA September 21, 2011 – 6:00 p.m. COUNCIL CHAMBERS MEMBERS PRESENT: Lynne Carper, Claudia Johnston-Madison, Dennis Morris, Carl Robertson MEMBERS ABSENT: Robert Kramer, Richard Person, Larry Shapiro STAFF PRESENT: Meg McMonigal, Gary Morrison, Nancy Sells 3. Hearings A. Preliminary Plat Fretham Twelfth Addition Location: 8910 and 8920 Minnetonka Boulevard Applicant: Lakewest Development Case No.: 11-18-S Gary Morrison, Assistant Zoning Administrator, presented the staff report. Lakewest Development (Curt Fretham) is requesting a Preliminary Plat to allow for the subdivision of two lots at 8910 and 8920 Minnetonka Boulevard into six (6) new lots. He stated there is a proposal for Lots 5 and 6 to share a common driveway access onto Minnetonka Blvd. Lots 1, 2 and 3 will have access onto Ensign Ave. Lot 4 as a corner lot could have access onto either street; however Hennepin County and City staff are requesting that the access be directed onto Ensign Ave. Mr. Morrison discussed the 7 foot road dedication along Minnetonka Blvd. He spoke about the stormwater plan for the area which is to create a small area in the back of Lots 2 and 3, primarily 3. It was originally shown to be a wet pond but most recently is proposed to be a dry retention pond, only a foot or two deep. Mr. Morrison spoke about the house on Lot 1, on the north end of the cul-de-sac. He spoke about the grade change of 29 ft. from the top of the bluff down to the lake. The idea is to protect that bluff. Staff has asked, and the developer agrees, that the bluff should not be graded or disturbed in any way. Therefore, it is proposed that the house will not have a walk-out basement. Mr. Morrison said at the neighborhood meeting held on September 13th there were a couple of requests regarding placement of the house (Lot 1) in relation to the west property line and also to the front property line along Ensign. He said this would require a variance for the front yard setback. As part of that consideration, when the request for a greater side yard and lesser front yard is combined, it affects the shape of the house. The lot is somewhat of a pie shape as it is on the end of a cul-de-sac. As the house is moved forward the width of the house starts to shrink. This results in a house that is more garage forward. Mr. Morrison said this didn’t come to a resolution at the neighborhood City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 8a) Subject: Fretham Twelfth Addition – Preliminary Plat Page 21 meeting. Mr. Morrison noted that comments received at the neighborhood meeting, along with recommendations resulting from the meeting, are included in the staff report. Mr. Morrison stated that staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat subject to conditions in the staff report, and six additional conditions: 1) Lot 1 shall not have a walk-out basement; 2) that the house on Lot 1 shall be a least 7.5 ft. from the west property line; 3) Lot 4 shall have access to Ensign Ave. S. only; 4) Lot 4 shall have a 30 ft. setback on both Minnetonka Blvd. and Ensign Ave. S.; 5) Lots 5 and 6 shall have a shared driveway access; and 6) that the pond shall be planted with water tolerant grasses, shrubs and trees. Commissioner Carper remarked about the irregular shape of Lot 2. Mr. Morrison said part of the issue with Lot 2 is the angular shape of the parent parcel, itself. He said the main part of Lot 2 where the house would sit is a standard rectangular shape. Commissioner Carper asked if there was any discussion with the developer about combining Lots 1 and 2 into something more regular and then expand Lot 3. Mr. Morrison responded said there were conversations about combining lots but the conclusion they came to was that Lots 1, 2 and 3 are well over the 9,000 sq. ft. minimum. Given the size of the lots and the fact that the houses will be up front, it leaves a backyard area that is fairly typical and common. Commissioner Carper asked who would be responsible for maintenance of the dry pond. Mr. Morrison said there will be an easement over the pond and the City will be responsible for the pond. Commissioner Morris asked how the City would access the pond. Mr. Morrison said there will be a 20 foot easement between Lots 2 and 3. There will also be additional easement along Lot 6 which provides access. Commissioner Robertson commended staff and the developer for a very straightforward proposal which meets all zoning and guiding. Mr. Morrison replied that it was the developer’s intent to have no variances on the plat. Curt Fretham, applicant, spoke about concerns he has with two of the additional six conditions. He is concerned about No. 2 (Lot 1) with respect to the 7.5 ft. setback from the west property line. He said the homes will be custom homes and he‘d like the property owner to have some discretion about placement of garage and some of those factors. He said he understands and appreciates the neighbors’ concerns. Mr. Fretham said he wonders if there isn’t another way to provide more space on that side other than a setback. He added that maybe it won’t be impactful because the house designed there works well there anyway. City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 8a) Subject: Fretham Twelfth Addition – Preliminary Plat Page 22 Mr. Fretham spoke about concern with condition No. 4 regarding Lot 4 having a 30 ft. setback from Minnetonka Blvd. and Ensign Ave. as it restricts what the homeowner could do. Corner lots generally have the ability to have a reduced setback on one of the two sides. He said he hoped there would be some latitude from staff and the Commission on conditions No. 2 and 4. Commissioner Carper asked if Mr. Fretham was the builder. Mr. Fretham responded that he is not a builder. He said he works with a number of builders. He also works with potential homeowners. He said there will probably be one or two builders on the site. Commissioner Carper asked if Mr. Fretham would be willing to sell the lots individually without any criteria for the buildings on it. Mr. Fretham replied that was a fair statement. Commissioner Robertson asked what the typical side yard setback is for a corner lot. Mr. Morrison said the side yard abutting the street is 15 feet. The requirement for the corner lot in this case came from the request to have the access for Lot 4 onto Ensign Ave. So the thought was if the house was going to face Ensign, then it should be consistent with the other houses along Ensign. Commissioner Robertson commented that many houses have their access off an alley, so just because the access is off of Ensign doesn’t mean the house will face Ensign. He thought it should be left to someone with design skills to finesse that and not constrain through zoning. Commissioner Morris asked if Mr. Fretham is the land subdivider and could sell off all parcels or individual parcels, could new owners of lots then come in and ask for variances? Mr. Morrison responded the thought was if the standard was established now, 30 ft. setback off of Ensign, if someone comes forward with a design for the house primarily facing Minnetonka, the owner would have to come back for a variance for a 15 ft. setback. Meg McMonigal, Planning and Zoning Supervisor, said plats are reviewed such that they don’t have to have variances, but a property owner can always request a variance in the future. She added that the lots are fairly big and there doesn’t appear to be any reason that variances would be needed in the future. Commissioner Robertson asked if there are corner lots throughout the city with a 15 ft. setback, why would this one need 30 ft? Ms. McMonigal said perhaps the modification would be if the house faces Ensign then it is setback 30 ft. so it’s in line with the houses on Lots 1, 2 and 3. If it faces Minnetonka then it should be in line with Lots 5 and 6. City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 8a) Subject: Fretham Twelfth Addition – Preliminary Plat Page 23 Mr. Fretham had questions about determining which way the house faces. He said he sees the 30 ft. as overly restrictive and a hardship placed on this corner lot. Commissioner Robertson commented that street access doesn’t determine the front of house, but which face the front entry door is on is the perceived front of house. Ms. McMonigal said the intent was that in either case if it is set back 30 ft. from both streets there isn’t an issue with it feeling forward compared to the other houses. Mr. Fretham said even if the normal setback is there, it doesn’t mean that house would get pushed up. Chair Johnston-Madison opened the public hearing. Dean Gutzke, 2920 Ensign Ave. S., asked if any traffic counts have been done in the area. Ms. McMonigal responded there might be some traffic counts on Minnetonka Blvd. Mr. Gutzke said traffic counts should be done now since there are a number of new developments in the area. Mr. Gutzke said he appreciated the feedback and consideration given at the neighborhood meeting. He stated there still isn’t a resolution on the setback for one of the lots. He asked what the process was for a firm resolution on this issue. Commissioner Morris asked if Mr. Gutzke’s concern for traffic counts was for Minnetonka Blvd. or Ensign Ave. Mr. Gutzke responded he was concerned about both streets. Commissioner Morris asked about parking on Ensign. Mr. Gutzke said there is limited parking in front of residences on Ensign. Guests often have to park across the street and cross Minnetonka Blvd. on foot. Four new driveways will restrict parking even further. Mr. Gutzke asked staff to review setbacks. Mr. Morrison said the minimum front setback is 30 ft., minimum sideyard setback is 6 ft., and minimum rearyard is 25 ft. Mr. Gutzke spoke about the Cavell/Boone development which has the same builder and was approved by the Planning Commission. Ms. McMonigal noted that there was a picture of the layout of Fretham 9th Addition in the staff report. City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 8a) Subject: Fretham Twelfth Addition – Preliminary Plat Page 24 Mr. Gutzke discussed the corner lot, Lot 3, of Fretham 9th Addition. He remarked this is an example of how houses can be packed on a plat that meet criteria on paper, but the reality of it is something different. He encouraged commissioners to drive by this site before a decision is made on Fretham Twelfth Addition. Mr.Gutzke asked if the project had been discussed with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed. Mr. Morrison replied that the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District has a copy of the plan. The City’s Public Works Dept. has also reviewed the plan and has determined that it essentially meets the requirements, although they haven’t looked at the revision yet. He said he has not personally had contact with the Watershed District as those conversations take place with engineers in Public Works. Mr. Gutzke said he received an email on September 21st from the Watershed District which said they are not aware of this project. Mr. Gutzke said there will be a significant drainage impact. He said he will be speaking to the Watershed District about the project. He spoke about a current drainage area that goes right into the lake. The 100 ft. pipe freezes up and water goes right into the lake. There is no natural barrier, just pipe which freezes up every year. More homes and driveways and sidewalks are going to produce more run-off. He said water won’t flow uphill from all the new lots going into the pond. It looks good on paper but the reality will be tough. One area is already flooding. Mr. Gutzke discussed average lot sizes and actual buildable space. Ms. McMonigal said the proposed lots are not average lot sizes but actual lot sizes. The minimum requirement is 9,000 sq. ft. Sometimes the lot will be in green space or sloped area. 9,000 isn’t a minimum buildable area, but a minimum overall lot size. She said the developer has to show on the plat documents that there is adequate building area to place a home on the flat portion of the lot. Robert Slavik, 2962 Ensign Ave. S., asked what would prevent a homeowner from putting a load of dirt on the dry pond. Mr. Morrison said there will be a drainage easement over the pond that prevents that situation. Mr. Slavik commented that corner lots are always a problem so why not do this right. He said the neighborhood isn’t against building houses but this proposal is maximizing everything. The existing lots in the neighborhood are much bigger than the proposed lots. The code is being met and everything is being maximized but it doesn’t fit in with the neighborhood. He spoke about problems with Fretham 9th Addition and the Westling Estates. He recommended that 4 lots rather than 6 lots would be a better neighborhood fit. David Marquis, 2932 Ensign Ave. S., spoke about the character of the neighborhood. He spoke about the setbacks of all the existing homes in relation to the street. He said he would prefer to see smaller houses with more reasonable setbacks for some kind of continuity to the neighborhood. He added that it is very unfortunate that the brick house on the corner will be torn down as part of this project. He said it is a wonderful structure, a beautiful home and it is well situated on the lot. City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 8a) Subject: Fretham Twelfth Addition – Preliminary Plat Page 25 Tom Burt, 2980 Ensign Ave. S., asked about distance between house 4 and 5, and 5 and 6. Mr. Morrison said at this time it is the minimum setback required which is 6 ft. on each side. So if the houses are built at the minimum setback they would be 12 feet apart, but they can be further away from the property line. In response to Mr. Burt’s question about distance between houses 5 and 3 and 4 and 3, Mr. Morrison said lot 5 would be the rear yard setback which would have to be at least 25 ft. from the property line. Lot 3 could be as close as 6 ft.; however that is pretty far back in the lot. Technically they could be 31 ft. at the closest point. Mr. Morrison said these are standard setbacks in the R-1 zoning district. Mr. Burt asked if the developer is proposing a 30 ft. setback on house 4. Mr. Morrison stated the developer has concerns with the 30 ft. setback which staff has recommended. This recommendation came out of the neighborhood meeting. In response to Mr. Burt’s questions about setbacks and orientation of the house, Mr. Morrison said there is a difference in setbacks only for the shape of the lot. In looking at the shape of the lot for a corner lot, the narrower of the two is considered the front. The way the house is oriented is up to the owner of the house. Mr. Burt asked about the city timeline. Ms. McMonigal said after Planning Commission makes its recommendation preliminary plat requests go to the City Council in approximately one month. If approved, the developer has to prepare a final plat which addresses any issues that came up and then finalize everything and submit a final plat to the City Council at a public meeting for review and approval. The entire process takes a couple of months. Stephanie Slavik, 2962 Ensign Ave. S., said her family moved to St. Louis Park 7 ½ years ago for schools, location to employers, character of the mature neighborhoods, the house, and the street. She remarked the proposal of 6 homes is hard to see happen. Because it meets code doesn’t make it right. Ms. Slavik is concerned about her home value and her neighborhood value. She said she is concerned that this is the third development in their neighborhood in the last two years. It feels like a trend. She said she’s concerned about the vision of the city overdeveloping every green space and opportunity that comes along. She doesn’t think this is what the city is about. They will be sacrificing peace and quiet. It will be disappointing to look at these gigantic homes. It will be very disappointing to see this is the vision of where St. Louis Park is going. She concluded by saying 6 homes is too many. Pat Greene, 8900 Minnetonka Blvd., said she agreed with the neighbors’ comments. She said most of the surrounding homes are single level and now they will surround a big white elephant. She asked if there would be fencing around the pond. Commissioner Robertson said the dry pond will have a 1 ½ ft. depression and will hardly be noticeable. It will collect water, have native vegetation, and become a swampy area but it is not a pool. City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 8a) Subject: Fretham Twelfth Addition – Preliminary Plat Page 26 Ms. Greene said she was concerned about children’s safety near the pond. She asked about the main gas line on Minnetonka Blvd. Mr. Morrison responded that the gas line won’t be altered or relocated. Marty Campion, project engineer, said all the small utilities were notified when the survey was prepared. They were all on site locating their utilities. The gas line runs parallel to Minnetonka Blvd. It will be within the easement that will be established in the front yards along Minnetonka Blvd. As no one else was present wishing to speak, the Chair closed the public hearing. Chair Johnston-Madison stated that all commissioners are long term residents of the city and all have seen changes in their own neighborhoods over time. Commissioner Robertson said he understands the neighborhood reaction. He said the commission looks at a balance between zoning, setbacks, watershed and green space. He stated that the City’s Housing Summit identified a disparity or shortage of certain housing and wants a good healthy mix of housing. The City has been slightly lacking in larger single family homes. Commissioner Robertson said the developer’s proposal meets City requirements and long term goals. Commissioner Morris asked staff to address the problem regarding insufficient capacity of the outlet pipe from the manhole to the lake. He asked that Public Works be made aware that it may need to be upgraded, especially since the development will increase water flow into it. Commissioner Morris suggested that Ensign Ave. may need to be widened for parking and increased traffic. Commissioner Morris said he strongly recommended that the frontage on Minnetonka Blvd. be established for Lot 4. Commissioner Carper said he was empathetic and sympathetic with the neighborhood. He discussed a past study which looked at having different property size minimums depending on neighborhood characteristics. He said there was no support outside of the Lake Forest neighborhood. Subsequent to the study, property owners of large lots began subdividing in anticipation that there could be some restrictions. Commissioner Carper added that the Commission needs to comply with the zoning ordinance. Commissioner Morris made a motion recommending approval of the Preliminary Plat subject to all conditions in the staff report and subject to the additional conditions presented by staff with the exception of condition No. 4. Commissioner Robertson seconded the motion and the motion passed on a vote of 4-0. City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 8a) Subject: Fretham Twelfth Addition – Preliminary Plat Page 27 Meeting Date: November 21, 2011 Agenda Item #: 8b Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance Presentation Other: EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other: Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other: TITLE: Amending the Plan by Neighborhood Section of Comprehensive Plan. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to adopt Resolution Amending the Plan by Neighborhood section of the Comprehensive Plan and authorize publication of summary resolution. POLICY CONSIDERATION: The 2009 Comprehensive Plan update set forth policy direction and created plans city-wide. The Plan by Neighborhood section of the Comprehensive Plan takes the policies and plans in the overall Comprehensive Plan to the neighborhood level, and highlights each neighborhood’s input and priorities for the future. The policies of the Comprehensive Plan are carried through at the neighborhood level; new policy directions are not proposed in this amendment. BACKGROUND: Strong neighborhoods are the backbone of St. Louis Park. In 2009 the City facilitated a city- wide neighborhood input process to update the “Plan by Neighborhood” section of its Comprehensive Plan that was originally adopted in 1998. Over 150 citizens and business owners participated in the process, giving valuable input on what is important at the neighborhood level. Participants worked on identifying neighborhood features as well as priorities for the future. The input, as well as detailed information for each neighborhood, has been updated and is now ready for finalizing. Attached is the Introduction and one of the neighborhood plans, South Oak Hill, as a sample. The Plan by Neighborhood section is a very large document. Thus, the entire plan and each individual neighborhood’s plan are on the City’s web site: http://www.stlouispark.org/comprehensive-plan/plan-by-neighborhood.html Plan by Neighborhood Elements St. Louis Park has valued the preservation and enhancement of each neighborhood. The Plan by Neighborhood section shows that each has a unique sense of identity based on location, natural features, history, development character and residents. Ideally, strong neighborhoods also provide connectedness and support for a wide range of individuals and families, a source of friendship and neighbors to rely upon if the need arises. Each neighborhood plan consists of the following components: • History and Character • Neighborhood Features Map and Table • Neighborhood Analysis Table • Recent Plans and Studies (Directly Relevant to Each Neighborhood) • 2030 Land Use Plan Map • 2030 Comprehensive Plan Improvement Priorities • Neighborhood Improvement Opportunities (Identified by Neighborhood Input Process) • Neighborhood Improvement Priorities Map City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 8b) Page 2 Subject: Amending the Plan by Neighborhood Section of Comprehensive Plan Summary of Input Much of the input from neighbors reinforced the city’s existing Comprehensive Plan policies, as well as echoing the direction in the City’s Vision statement. Neighborhood input, given by individual neighborhoods, neighborhood planning areas, as well as city-wide input, identified the following neighborhood priorities: • Increasing neighborhood walkability • Improving traffic calming measures to create safer and more livable neighborhood streets. • Reducing nuisances. • Enhancing public natural areas and open spaces. • Expanding the network of bike routes. • Expanding and improving neighborhood commercial nodes as walkable destinations. • Retaining and attracting small businesses to neighborhood commercial nodes. • Improving the compatibility between adjacent industrial areas and residential areas. • Mitigating the nuisances created by freight rail lines adjacent to residential areas. • Improving access from the neighborhoods to the North Cedar Lake Regional Trail. • Neighborhood Identity and Gathering Places. Process Following the input process, the city’s consultant HKGi created the Plan by Neighborhood section. In the spring of 2011 it was shared with neighborhood leaders. A public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on October 5, 2011 and neighborhood leaders were notified that the plan was being finalized and the plans were available on the city’s web site. Staff provided the Council with a study session report on this matter for the November 14 study session. Recommendation The Planning Commission held a public hearing on October 5, 2011; no one was present to comment. The Planning Commission recommended adoption of the Plan by Neighborhood chapter of the Comprehensive Plan. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable at this time VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged community, with an aim toward strengthening neighborhoods. Attachments: Resolution Plan by Neighborhood - Introduction South Oak Hill Plan by Neighborhood Section Prepared by: Meg J. McMonigal, Planning and Zoning Supervisor Reviewed by: Kevin Locke, Community Development Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 8b) Page 3 Subject: Amending the Plan by Neighborhood Section of Comprehensive Plan RESOLUTION NO. 11-____ RESOLUTION AMENDING THE PLAN BY NEIGHBORHOOD SECTION (OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK WHEREAS, the 2030 Comprehensive Plan was adopted by the City Council on December 21, 2009 following a public hearing and due consideration thereof, and WHEREAS, the Plan by Neighborhood section of the Comprehensive Plan was subsequently updated and revised, and WHEREAS, a community input process involving over 150 neighbors and business owners was completed to provide information and input from neighborhoods, and WHEREAS, the revised Plan by Neighborhood section will replace the existing section, providing updated information and detail, along with input from neighbors, and WHEREAS, Vision St. Louis Park directions have been incorporated and integrated in the Plan by Neighborhood, and WHEREAS, the Plan will prepare the community for anticipated desirable change, thereby bringing about significant savings in both private and public expenditures, and WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan is a living document intended to reflect physical, social, economic, and environmental conditions and promote a desirable planning framework, and WHEREAS, the use of such Comprehensive Plan will insure a safer, more pleasant, and more economical environment for neighborhoods and will promote the public health, safety, and general welfare for the community, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed Plan by Neighborhood section of the Comprehensive Plan on October 5, 2011, following published notice in the official newspaper on September 8, 2011, September 15, 2011, and September 22, 2011, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of St. Louis Park recommended adoption of the Plan by Neighborhood section of the Comprehensive Plan, and WHEREAS, the contents of Planning Case File 11-22-CP are hereby entered into and made part of the public hearing record and the record of decision for this case. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of St. Louis Park that the revised Plan by Neighborhood section of the Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended and incorporated into the City’s Comprehensive Plan as section VI. F. City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 8b) Page 4 Subject: Amending the Plan by Neighborhood Section of Comprehensive Plan Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council November 21, 2011 City Manager Mayor Attest: City Clerk City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 8b) Page 5 Subject: Amending the Plan by Neighborhood Section of Comprehensive Plan SUMMARY FOR PUBLICATION RESOLUTION NO. 11-____ RESOLUTION AMENDING THE PLAN BY NEIGHBORHOOD SECTION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK This resolution states that the Plan by Neighborhood Section of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan has been approved. Adopted by the City Council November 21, 2011 Contingent upon approval of the Metropolitan Council Jeffrey W. Jacobs /s/ Mayor A copy of the full text of this resolution is available for inspection with the City Clerk. Published in St. Louis Park Sailor: December 1, 2011 VI. F. Plan by Neighborhood SEPTEMBER 2011 www.stlouispark.org City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 8b) Subject: Amending the Plan by Neighborhood Section of Comprehensive Plan Page 6 Environmental Stewardship 2 ComprehensivePlan IV. Why We Are A Livable Community Introduction IV-F2 ComprehensivePlan Plan by Neighborhood Index NORTHEAST Blackstone……………………….....................................................................................................................IV-F12 Cedarhurst........................................................................................................................................................IV-F18 Eliot...................................................................................................................................................................IV-F24 Eliot View…………………….........................................................................................................................IV-F30 NORTHWEST Cedar Manor……………………....................................................................................................................IV-F36 Crestview……………………..........................................................................................................................IV-F42 Kilmer……………………...............................................................................................................................IV-F48 Pennsylvania Park……………………............................................................................................................IV-F54 Shelard Park……………………......................................................................................................................IV-F60 Westdale……………………............................................................................................................................IV-F66 Westwood Hills……………………................................................................................................................IV-F72 Willow Park……………………......................................................................................................................IV-F78 WEST CENTRAL Amhurst……………………............................................................................................................................IV-F84 Aquila……………………................................................................................................................................IV-F90 Cobblecrest…………………….......................................................................................................................IV-F96 Minnehaha…………………….......................................................................................................................IV-F102 Oak Hill……………………...........................................................................................................................IV-F108 Texa Tonka…………………….......................................................................................................................IV-F114 CENTRAL Birchwood…………………….........................................................................................................................IV-F120 Bronx Park………………………....................................................................................................................IV-F126 Lenox……………………................................................................................................................................IV-F132 Sorenson……………………...........................................................................................................................IV-F138 EAST CENTRAL Fern Hill……………………...........................................................................................................................IV-F144 Lake Forest…………………….......................................................................................................................IV-F150 Triangle……………………............................................................................................................................IV-F156 SOUTHEAST Browndale……………………........................................................................................................................IV-F162 Minikahda Oaks……………………..............................................................................................................IV-F168 Minikahda Vista……………………..............................................................................................................IV-F174 Wolfe Park……………………........................................................................................................................IV-F180 SOUTHWEST Brooklawns…………………….....................................................................................................................IV-F186 Brookside……………………........................................................................................................................IV-F192 Creekside……………………........................................................................................................................IV-F198 Elmwood……………………........................................................................................................................IV-F204 Meadowbrook……………………................................................................................................................IV-F210 South Oak Hill……………………..............................................................................................................IV-F216 City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 8b) Subject: Amending the Plan by Neighborhood Section of Comprehensive Plan Page 7 Environmental Stewardship 3 ComprehensivePlan IV. Why We Are A Livable Community Introduction IV-F3 ComprehensivePlan Neighborhood Planning Areas Plan Created: July 25, 2011 Prepared By: St. Louis Park Community Development Ü 0 0.5 10.25 Miles Neighborhood Planning Areas §¨¦394 §¨¦394 £¤169 £¤169 Û7 Æÿ100 Æÿ100Northwest Northeast West Central East Central Central Southeast Southwest City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 8b) Subject: Amending the Plan by Neighborhood Section of Comprehensive Plan Page 8 Environmental Stewardship 4 ComprehensivePlan IV. Why We Are A Livable Community Introduction IV-F4 ComprehensivePlan Introduction Vision For Neighborhoods St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged community. St. Louis Park’s Plan by Neighborhood is guided by the City’s vision of creating and maintaining a very “livable community” built upon strong neighborhoods. The ideal neighborhood has a center, public gathering places, identifiable edges, and a walkable environment. Although each neighborhood has a unique history, development pattern, character, challenges, and opportunities, all neighborhoods should ideally provide a healthy living environment with convenient access to essential community services, including transportation options, jobs, parks and open space, shopping, services, entertainment, and other urban amenities. Strong neighborhoods are the backbone of St. Louis Park being a healthy community. As the community and neighborhoods face inevitable change over time, the City values the preservation and enhancement of each neighborhood’s unique sense of identity based on its location, natural features, history, development character and residents. Ideally, strong neighborhoods also provide connectedness and support for a wide range of individuals and families, a source of friendship and neighbors you can rely upon if the need arises. To support its Livable Community Vision, St. Louis Park has established ten Livable Community Principles consisting of the following: 1. Walkable, mixed-use neighborhoods 2. Life-cycle housing choices 3. Higher density, mixed-use development 4. Human scale development 5. Transit-oriented development 6. Multi-modal streets and pathways 7. Preserved and enhanced natural environment 8. Attractive and convenient public gathering places 9. Public art, heritage, and culture 10. Unique community and neighborhood identity Most of these Livable Community Principles explicitly address the desired character of the community’s neighborhoods and the major role strong neighborhoods play in creating a livable community. Where We Have Been Although St. Louis Park’s early urban development in the late 19th century began by progressing outward from the original village center, at the intersection of the Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad (now CP Rail) and Wooddale Avenue, this concentric growth pattern was overtaken by outward expansion from Minneapolis. A secondary influence was the two streetcar lines that extended outward from Minneapolis in the early 20th century: St. Louis Park Line along West Lake Street/Minnetonka Boulevard and the Como-Harriet Line along the south edge of the City. The City’s City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 8b) Subject: Amending the Plan by Neighborhood Section of Comprehensive Plan Page 9 Environmental Stewardship 5 ComprehensivePlan IV. Why We Are A Livable Community - DRAFT Introduction IV-F5 ComprehensivePlan Environmental Stewardship 5 ComprehensivePlan IV. Why We Are A Livable Community Introduction IV-F5 ComprehensivePlan Eliot Aquila Lenox Fern Hill Wolfe Park Oak Hill BlackstoneWestwood Hills Birchwood Elmwood Sorensen Triangle Creekside Bronx Park Cedar Manor Cobblecrest Lake Forest Texa Tonka Willow Park Minikahda Vista Browndale South Oak HillKilmer BrooklawnsMeadowbrook Eliot View Cedarhurst Shelard Park Brookside Minne- haha Pennsylvania Park Crest- view AmhurstWest- dale Minikahda Oaks City of St. Louis Park Neighborhoods Neighborhood Map Created: November 3, 2008 Prepared By: St. Louis Park Information Resources Neighborhoods Shelard Parkway I-394 I-394 Flag AveHighway 169Edgemore DrTexas AveLouisiana AveHwy 7 Texas AveExcelsior WayHwy 100Hwy 100Soo Line RRHwy 7 Minnetonka Blvd 28th St W Burlington N o r t h e r n R R France AveExcelsi or Bl v d Natchez Ave44th St Northw e st er n R R Douglas Ave 22nd St W Hwy 7 0 0.5 1 Miles Ü RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 8b) Subject: Amending the Plan by Neighborhood Section of Comprehensive Plan Page 10 Environmental Stewardship 6 ComprehensivePlan IV. Why We Are A Livable Community - DRAFT Introduction IV-F6 ComprehensivePlan Environmental Stewardship 6 ComprehensivePlan IV. Why We Are A Livable Community Introduction IV-F6 ComprehensivePlan oldest neighborhoods with traditional street grids are located in these areas – south, east and central - with more suburban neighborhood development patterns occurring in the western and northern areas of the community. Homes in the older and more traditional neighborhoods have an average year built in the 1930s and 1940s with the oldest homes built in the 1920s and earlier. The newer and more suburban neighborhoods contain homes primarily built in the 1950s and after. Approximately 60% of the City’s housing stock was constructed in a short time period following WWII, from the late 1940s through the 1950s, primarily as starter homes for GI Bill families. Neighborhood planning began in St. Louis Park in the mid- 1980s with the establishment of the Neighborhood Watch/Block Captain Program in 1983. In 1990, the City Council formed the Neighborhood Revitalization Task Force to address the need for and the benefits of developing a neighborhood revitalization program. Based on the Task Force’s recommendation to pursue such a program, the City Council appointed the Neighborhood Revitalization Committee and directed this group to implement a neighborhood revitalization program. In 1992, the City established a Neighborhood Revitalization Commission (NRC). The purposes of the NRC were to: • Create and maintain a sense of community • Improve the appearance of neighborhoods • Increase the feeling of security • Identify and satisfy social needs • Work toward achieving a high quality of life in St. Louis Park In 1991, the Neighborhood Revitalization Committee identified neighborhoods defining neighborhood boundaries primarily by rail corridors, major streets, natural features and/or municipal borders. The exceptions are the smallest neighborhoods which are mainly isolated residential subdivisions, including Minikahda Oaks, Amhurst, Minnehaha, Westdale, Crestview, Kilmer and Shelard Park. The final neighborhood boundaries were drawn after residents were surveyed about their perceptions of their neighborhoods. This city-wide survey also was used to determine what St. Louis Park residents liked and did not like about their neighborhoods. The City of St. Louis Park has defined 35 neighborhoods that encompass the entire land area of the City. These neighborhoods are diverse in land area and population, ranging from 30 to 2,000 acres in area and from 100 to 3,000 residents. Figure 1 shows a map of the 35 neighborhoods. In 1996, the City established the pilot Neighborhood Revitalization Grant Program that provides funding specifically for neighborhood improvement activities and projects. In 1998, a full-time staff position was created to focus on the coordination of neighborhood programs, organizations and activities. The Plan by Neighborhood has been a chapter of the City’s Comprehensive Plan since 2000. City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 8b) Subject: Amending the Plan by Neighborhood Section of Comprehensive Plan Page 11 Environmental Stewardship 7 ComprehensivePlan IV. Why We Are A Livable Community Introduction IV-F7 ComprehensivePlan Eliot Aquila Lenox Fern Hill Wolfe Park Oak Hill BlackstoneWestwood Hills Birchwood Elmwood Sorensen Triangle Creekside Bronx Park Cedar Manor Cobblecrest Lake Forest Texa Tonka Willow Park Minikahda Vista Browndale South Oak HillKilmer PondBrooklawnsMeadowbrook Eliot View Cedarhurst Shelard Park Brookside Minne- haha Pennsylvania Park Crest- view AmhurstWest- dale Minikahda Oaks Residential Neighborhood Type Neighborhood Map Created: March 2011 Prepared By: St. Louis Park Information Resources High Density Residential Mixed Density Residential Medium Density Residential Low Density Residential Neighborhoods Shelard Parkway I-394 I-394 Flag AveHighway 169Edgemore DrTexas AveLouisiana AveHwy 7 Texas AveExcelsior WayHwy 100Hwy 100Soo Line RRHwy 7 Minnetonka Blvd 28th St W Burlington N o r t h e r n R R France AveExcelsi or Bl v d Natchez Ave44th St Northw e st er n R R Douglas Ave 22nd St W Hwy 7 0 0.5 1 Miles Ü Legend High Density Residential Mixed Density Residential Medium Density Residential Low Density Residential RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD TYPE City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 8b) Subject: Amending the Plan by Neighborhood Section of Comprehensive Plan Page 12 Environmental Stewardship 8 ComprehensivePlan IV. Why We Are A Livable Community Introduction IV-F8 ComprehensivePlan Where We Are Today Neighborhood Housing Options Overall, St. Louis Park’s mix of residential land uses and housing types is distributed around the community. Some neighborhoods contain a balanced mix of housing options within them, while others contain predominately one type of housing, either single- family detached houses, medium density housing, or high density housing. Figure 2 shows a map of the 35 neighborhoods categorized by their mix/type of housing options. About a third of the community’s neighborhoods (11 neighborhoods) contain a broad mix of housing options. About half of the neighborhoods (18 neighborhoods) contain predominately low density residential land uses as measured by percentage of housing units that are single-family detached houses. Just two (2) neighborhoods contain predominately medium density residential land uses. Four (4) neighborhoods contain predominately high density residential land uses. Neighborhood Commercial Areas St. Louis Park contains neighborhood commercial corridors along some its major community roadways, consisting of the following corridors: • Excelsior Boulevard East • Excelsior Boulevard West • Minnetonka Boulevard East (scattered between France Avenue and Highway 100) • Walker-Lake Streets Area • Wayzata Boulevard / I-394 frontage (primarily east of Louisiana Avenue) St. Louis Park contains a number of neighborhood commercial nodes at key street intersections within the community, including the following: • Texas and Minnetonka (TexaTonka) • Minnetonka & Louisiana • Minnetonka & Dakota • Minnetonka & Lake • Louisiana & Cedar Lake Road • Louisiana & 27th Street In addition to neighborhood commercial areas, St. Louis Park has the Park Commons “Town Center” and three (3) community commercial centers (Knollwood, Miracle Mile, and Park Place Boulevard/The Shops at the West End). Neighborhood Parks There are 30 neighborhood parks, with most of the community’s 35 neighborhoods having their own neighborhood park. Those neighborhoods without their own neighborhood park have a neighborhood or community park located near them. The City does not have any current plans to acquire additional land for park purposes. Among the amenities found in neighborhood parks are play structures, athletic fields, community gardens, ponds, athletic courts, lakes, trails, sun/picnic shelters, park buildings, limited vehicle parking, sliding hills, and winter skating areas. In addition to neighborhood parks, St. Louis Park has community parks (8), community playfields (5), passive open spaces (20), historical parks (3), regional trails (2), and two golf courses (one public, one private). City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 8b) Subject: Amending the Plan by Neighborhood Section of Comprehensive Plan Page 13 Environmental Stewardship 9 ComprehensivePlan IV. Why We Are A Livable Community Introduction IV-F9 ComprehensivePlan Neighborhood Programs The City’s Neighborhood Watch/Block Captain Program continues to be a voluntary crime prevention program aimed at reducing the likelihood of becoming a crime victim. It works by teaching simple, yet proven crime prevention techniques and building a relationship among neighbors and between the neighborhood and the Police Department. There are approximately 300 Block Captains throughout the City today. Twenty-eight (28) of St. Louis Park’s 35 neighborhoods are represented by an organized neighborhood association. These groups can rally residents together to solve a problem or voice an opinion on a special issue. They can also hold neighborhood get- togethers, organize park clean-ups, or share services (trading home maintenance for child care, for example). Many neighborhoods publish newsletters listing upcoming events and neighborhood news. The City has a full-time Community Liaison position focused on the coordination of neighborhood programs, organizations and activities. The City has a Neighborhood Revitalization Grant Program that offers funding to organized neighborhoods for activities or projects that are targeted to enhance or build community within neighborhoods. For example, these grants can be used for community building activities, communications such as newsletters, and service projects. This grant program had $30,000 available in 2010 with a $2,000 maximum per neighborhood and $600 maximum per event. The City has a staff Outreach Connection Group which meets monthly to keep departments connected with each other and neighborhood activities. Where We Are Headed Neighborhood Planning Areas As part of the updating process for the Plan by Neighborhood chapter, seven (7) Neighborhood Planning Areas (NPAs) were established to more efficiently facilitate neighborhood input and identify common neighborhood issues and opportunities. The seven (7) NPAs clusters the 35 neighborhoods into larger geographic areas separated by the community’s most significant “edges”, which are major roadways (MN Hwy 100, MN Hwy 7, and Louisiana Avenue) and the rail corridors. Based on the success of using the seven (7) NPAs to attract neighborhood input for the Plan by Neighborhood update project, the City intends to use the NPAs as a more effective and efficient means of seeking neighborhood input in the future. Figure 3 shows a map of the seven (7) NPAs, which are: • Northeast : Blackstone, Cedarhurst, Eliot, Eliot View • Northwest: Cedar Manor, Crestview, Kilmer, Pennsylvania Park, Shelard Park, Westdale, Westwood Hills, Willow Park) • West Central: Amhurst, Aquila, Cobblecrest, Minnehaha, Oak Hill, Texa Tonka • Central: Birchwood, Bronx Park, Lenox, Sorenson • East Central (Fern Hill, Lake Forest, Triangle) • Southeast (Browndale, Minikahda Oaks, Minikahda Vista, Wolfe Park) • Southwest (Brooklawns, Brookside, Creekside, Elmwood, Photo: Adjo Habia / SLP Friends of the Arts City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 8b) Subject: Amending the Plan by Neighborhood Section of Comprehensive Plan Page 14 Environmental Stewardship 10 ComprehensivePlan IV. Why We Are A Livable Community Introduction IV-F10 ComprehensivePlan Meadowbrook, South Oak Hill) Neighborhood Improvement Priorities As a means to update the Plan by Neighborhood chapter and gain neighborhood input on the updated Comprehensive Plan, the City facilitated a neighborhood input process in spring 2009. This neighborhood input process was organized around the seven (7) NPAs. Analysis and evaluation of this neighborhood input at three levels – 35 individual neighborhoods, seven (7) NPAs, and city-wide – resulted in some key findings. Based on the neighborhood input received, the following improvements emerged as neighborhood priorities: • Increasing neighborhood walkability by expanding both the network of sidewalks and trails • Improving traffic calming measures to create safer and more livable neighborhood streets • Reducing nuisances, particularly noise and light impacts from streets, rail lines, industrial areas, and larger commercial areas • Enhancing public natural areas and open spaces within and adjacent to neighborhoods • Expanding the network of bike routes • Expanding and improving neighborhood commercial nodes as walkable neighborhood destinations • Retaining and attracting small businesses to neighborhood commercial nodes • Improving the compatibility between adjacent industrial areas and residential areas • Mitigating the nuisances created by freight rail lines adjacent to residential areas • Improving access from the neighborhoods to the North Cedar Lake Regional Trail, particularly adjacent neighborhoods north of the Burlington Northern Santa Fe railroad tracks. Neighborhood Identity and Gathering Places As a fully developed community, St. Louis Park neighborhoods will experience change and improvement primarily through reinvestment in existing development, public improvements, and site redevelopment. All of these investments represent opportunities to improve the neighborhood’s identity or character and create more and/or improved neighborhood gathering places. Public gathering places can consist of both publicly-owned (e.g. parks, plazas, sidewalks, trails, civic facilities, schools, libraries) and privately-owned (e.g. religious facilities, cafes, coffee shops, entertainment venues) spaces. Future parks, streets, trails and other public facility projects should incorporate opportunities to enhance neighborhood identity and gathering places. In particular, a neighborhood’s unique parks and open spaces provide valuable opportunities for strengthening neighborhood identity and gathering places. Likewise, redevelopment and major property reinvestment projects have the potential to enhance neighborhoods. For instance, new private development could incorporate a public plaza, public art, benches, wider sidewalks, transit amenities, neighborhood-related architecture or unique signage. Active Living Neighborhoods The City is committed to improving the community’s network of pedestrian and bicycle facilities to enhance all neighborhoods as places that enable more active lifestyles and convenient connections City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 8b) Subject: Amending the Plan by Neighborhood Section of Comprehensive Plan Page 15 Environmental Stewardship 11 ComprehensivePlan IV. Why We Are A Livable Community Introduction IV-F11 ComprehensivePlan to desirable neighborhood amenities. Each neighborhood plan identifies the pedestrian, bicycle and transit improvement priorities specifically related to that neighborhood. Since streets represent the major portion of a neighborhood’s public realm and pedestrian/bicycle facilities, improvements to make streets more pedestrian and bike-friendly are critical. Some of the most significant challenges to improving neighborhood pedestrian and bicycle networks involve crossings at rail lines, state highways and county highways, therefore, the community and the neighborhoods will often need to partner with these other entities to truly make the desired improvements. Neighborhood Housing Options St. Louis Park’s population is projected to grow and diversify over the next twenty years. While St. Louis Park will experience demographic changes in line with national, regional and metro trends, the City’s existing housing stock also influences the community’s future demographic composition. For example, the community’s large number of smaller starter homes attracts more single persons, younger families, and smaller households to the community. If St. Louis Park wants to enable residents to remain in the community and their neighborhood, throughout their lives, the community needs to offer a sufficiently diverse range of housing options. Many neighborhoods will benefit from opportunities to diversify their housing options through redevelopment and rehabilitation, especially larger homes for families, senior housing, affordable housing, and non-traditional owner-occupied housing. Each neighborhood plan identifies whether or not the neighborhood has significant redevelopment potential that could add new housing options in the neighborhood. Neighborhood Commercial Areas The 2030 Comprehensive Plan identifies the City’s need to conduct a study of the community’s existing neighborhood commercial corridors and nodes. Significant changes have occurred in the community’s transportation patterns, development patterns, commercial competition and consumers’ buying habits that present major challenges for many of the commercial corridors and nodes. This study would identify and evaluate these challenges as well as market viability and revitalization opportunities. In general, reinvestment or redevelopment in many neighborhood commercial areas is challenged by inadequate space for business expansions, parking, and storm water management. Neighborhood commercial corridors and nodes may offer attractive opportunities for adding new housing options, such as residential in mixed- use buildings. These neighborhood centers also can have significant potential for enhancing neighborhoods as important public gathering places, transportation nodes, and significantly contributing to a neighborhood’s sense of identity. Format of Each Neighborhood Plan Each neighborhood plan consists of the following components: • History and Character • Neighborhood Features Map and Table • Neighborhood Analysis Table • Recent Plans and Studies (Directly Relevant to Each Neighborhood) • 2030 Land Use Plan Map • 2030 Comprehensive Plan Improvement Priorities • Neighborhood Improvement Opportunities (Identified by Neighborhood Input Process) • Neighborhood Improvement Priorities Map City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 8b) Subject: Amending the Plan by Neighborhood Section of Comprehensive Plan Page 16 Environmental Stewardship 216 ComprehensivePlan IV. Why We Are A Livable Community F. Plan By Neighborhood - South Oak Hill Neighborhood IV-F216 ComprehensivePlan Neighborhood Features Map: South Oak Hill Neighborhood History and Character The South Oak Hill neighborhood is in the southern portion of the city, located on the south side of MN Hwy 7 between Texas Avenue and the CP Rail (MN & S Spur) line. Louisiana Avenue is the primary north-south street running through the neighborhood. This diverse neighborhood encompasses a small residential neighborhood, industrial areas, and some commercial businesses. Minnehaha Creek runs through the southwest corner of the neighborhood. The neighborhood’s boundaries are MN Hwy 7 (north); Texas Avenue (west); CP Rail/Bass Lake Spur line and Cedar Lake LRT Regional Trail (south); and CP Rail/ Louisiana OaksLouisiana Oaks Aquila ParkAquila Park Oak Hill ParkOak Hill Park Edgebrook ParkEdgebrook Park Walker FieldWalker Field Sunset Sunset ParkPark Freedom Park Freedom Park (Paul Frank)(Paul Frank) Elie Park/Elie Park/ Tower ParkTower Park Justad ParkJustad Park Isaac Walton League/CreeksideIsaac Walton League/Creekside Jorvig ParkJorvig Park Parkview Parkview ParkPark HIGHWAY 7 LAKE 36TH 34TH WALKER OXFOR D 37TH 1STRHODE ISLANDLI B R A R Y2NDGORHAM BRUNSWICKZINRANEXCELS I O R NORTH DAKOTAGOODRICH EDGEB R O O K DIVISION HAMILTON 34 1/2YUKON POWELL LOUISIANATAFTCOLORADOB R OW N L OW PENNSYLVANIAHOSPITAL SERVICEMEADOWBROOKR E P U B L I C BLAKEPHILLIPSMONI TO RDECATUR BLACKSTONEO A K L E A F CAMBRIDGEWYOMING WOODLANDBROOKVIEWTARGET SERVICESUNSET RIDGEBRUNS W I C K 37THWYOMINGDAKOTA35THVIRGINIA33RDYUKON 41STBOONERHODE ISLAND DAKOTA34THAQUILA QUEBECCOLORADOBOONEALABAMAVIRGINIA33RD 35TH UTAHHIGHWAY 7 EDGEWOODSUMTERIDAHOOXFORD 33RD I D A H OTEXAS BRUNSWICK36THXYLON RHODE ISLANDSUMTERDAKOTAUTAHXYLONLAKEVIRGINIA33RD G E O R G I A 39TH BRUNSWICKOREGON37TH QUEBECCAMBRIDGEPENNSYLVANIAHIGHWAY 7 MEADOWBROOKHIGHWAY 7 COLORADOW O O D D A L ECAVELL Knollwood Mall Methodist Hospital St. Louis Park High School Municipal Svc Center Central Community Center Prince of Peace Lutheran Church Hennepin County Library - SLP Fire Station 1 Church of the Holy Family 36TH ST W WALKER ST BLAKE RD NLOUISIANA AVE SOXFOR D S TAQUILA AVE S W O O D D A L E A V E MEADOWBROOK RDLAKE ST WTEXAS AVE SKnollwood Christian Church O a k P o n d S o u t h O a k P o n d City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 8b) Subject: Amending the Plan by Neighborhood Section of Comprehensive Plan Page 17 Environmental Stewardship 217 ComprehensivePlan IV. Why We Are A Livable Community F. Plan By Neighborhood - South Oak Hill Neighborhood IV-F217 ComprehensivePlan MN & S Spur line (east). The neighborhood shares its western and southern borders with the City of Hopkins. The residential neighborhood is oriented around Lake Street and consists primarily of single-family houses with some duplexes. South Oak Hill is one of the City’s oldest neighborhoods as it was part of an 1892 subdivision called “Rearrangement of St. Louis Park”. More than a dozen houses still existing in the neighborhood were constructed before 1900. The neighborhood park, Edgebrook Park, is located on the south edge of the neighborhood. As a linear park located along the rail line, it connects to the South Oak Pond open space area, which has a city trail along the western side of the pond that connects between Louisiana Ave and the Cedar Lake LRT Regional Trail. A neighborhood creek side access point to Minnehaha Creek is provided in the southwest corner of the neighborhood. The industrial areas on the east and west sides of Louisiana Avenue are considered part of the Oxford/Louisiana Industrial Park. A number of industrial buildings line the west side of Louisiana Ave between MN Hwy 7 and the rail line, which essentially surround the South Oak Pond. East of Louisiana Ave, the MN Hwy 7 Corporate Center development, which was completed in 2007, is an example of the City’s evolution toward new industrial buildings that meet contemporary business needs. In 2006, the big box retail building on the east side of Louisiana Ave was completed. An electrical substation is located on the east edge of the neighborhood next to the rail line. The MN Hwy 7 & Louisiana Ave intersection is planned for a future upgrade to a separated grade interchange, which is intended to improve the flow and safety of traffic through this busy intersection. A future LRT station is planned at the intersection of Louisiana Ave and the rail line as part of the Southwest LRT line. These major transportation changes will also have a major influence on redevelopment opportunities in this area. Neighborhood Features Information Neighborhood Name:South Oak Hill Institutions:Prince of Peace Lutheran Church Parks (active):Edgebrook Park, Oak Hill/Louisiana Oaks Park (immediately north of the neighborhood) Open spaces (passive):Minnehaha Creek, South Oak Pond Major streets:MN Hwy 7 (Principal Arterial) Louisiana Avenue (Minor Arterial) Lake Street, MN Hwy 7 frontage road (Minor Collectors) Transit corridors:Louisiana Ave, Texas Ave, 36th St, 37th St Walkways:Louisiana Ave, Lake Street, Quebec Ave, South Oak Pond Trail Bikeways:Cedar Lake LRT Regional Trail Commercial corridors & nodes: Knollwood Mall (Community Commercial Center) Walker-Lake Streets Area (Commercial Corridor) Industrial areas:Oxford/Louisiana Industrial Park (just south of neighborhood), CP Rail (both the Bass Lake Spur and the MN & S Spur) lines City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 8b) Subject: Amending the Plan by Neighborhood Section of Comprehensive Plan Page 18 Environmental Stewardship 218 ComprehensivePlan IV. Why We Are A Livable Community F. Plan By Neighborhood - South Oak Hill Neighborhood IV-F218 ComprehensivePlan Neighborhood Analysis Information Neighborhood Name:South Oak Hill Neighborhood spatial size:194.7 acres or 0.30 square miles Total number of housing units (2009): 298 Housing units occupied / occupancy rate: 296 (99.3%) Housing ownership / rental mix:95.3% homestead / 4.7% non-homestead Housing annualized turnover rate 2004-2009: 4.7% homestead, 19.0% non-homestead Average age of housing (single- family detached): 1947 Connectivity of neighborhood streets: Street connectivity in and out of the neighborhood is significantly limited due to railroad corridors (east and south), MN Hwy 7 (north), and South Oak Pond (central). Proximity/access to retail/ services: Convenient access to commercial businesses along Louisiana Ave and the Walker-Lake Streets Area commercial corridor northwest of the neighborhood. Access to community- scale retail and services at the Knollwood community commercial center. Proximity/access to transit:Convenient access to bus routes on Louisiana Ave, Texas Ave, 36th St, and 37th St. Proximity/access to parks/open space: Neighborhood parks: Edgebrook Park Community parks: Oak Hill Park & Louisiana Oaks Park (immediately north of the neighborhood) Vehicle traffic volumes of streets and intersections: MN Hwy 7 is approaching its design capacity and the Texas Ave/MN Hwy 7 intersection is anticipated to continue exceeding its design capacity. Pedestrian / bicycle facilities:Strengths: Sidewalks along Louisiana Ave; Cedar Lake LRT Regional Trail runs through the neighborhood. Weaknesses: Lack of designated north-south bikeway within the neighborhood that connects to surrounding destinations; gaps in sidewalks, including connections to parks and open spaces. 2030 Planned land use mix: SOUTH OAK HILL 17%15% 28% 40% Under Age 35 Age 35 to 54 Age 55 to 74 Age 75 or more Age mix of households: SOUTH OAK HILL3% 97% Single Family Detached Duplex/Triplex South Oak Hill 8% 8% 24% 4% 8% 3% 31% 12% 2% RL CIV COM O BP IND PRK RRR ROW Mix of housing types: Refer to 2030 Plan Land Use Map in Section IV-B for land use code abbreviations City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 8b) Subject: Amending the Plan by Neighborhood Section of Comprehensive Plan Page 19 Environmental Stewardship 219 ComprehensivePlan IV. Why We Are A Livable Community F. Plan By Neighborhood - South Oak Hill Neighborhood IV-F219 ComprehensivePlan South Oak Neighborhood Sign Recent Plans and Studies – Directly Relevant to South Oak Hill Neighborhood Planning • Active Living: Sidewalks & Trails Plan • Southwest Transitway (LRT) Study • Southwest Transitway Station Area Plan (Louisiana Station) HIGHWAY 7 LAKE 36TH 34TH WALKER 37TH 1STRHODE ISLANDLI B R A R Y2NDGORHAM BRUNSWICKZINRANEXCELS I O R NORTH DAKOTAEDGEB R O O K DIVISION HAMILTON 34 1/2YUKON POWELL TAFTCOLORADOBR O W N L O W PENNSYLVANIAHOSPITAL SERVICERE P U B L I C BLAKEM O N I T O R O A K L E A F CAMBRIDGEWYOMING WOODLANDBROOKVIEWTARGET SERVICESUNSET RIDGEBRUNS W I C K 37THWYOMINGDAKOTA35THVIRGINIA33RDYUKON 41STBOONERHODE IS LAND DAKOTA34THAQUILA QUEBECCOLORADOBOONEVIRGINIA33RD 35TH UTAHHIGHWAY 7 EDGEWOODSUMTEROXFORD ID A H OTEXAS BRUNSWICK36THXYLON RHODE ISLANDSUMTERDAKOTAUTAHXYLONLAKE33RD G E O R G I A 39TH BRUNSWICKOREGON37TH QUEBECCAM BRIDGEPENNSYLVANIAHIGHWAY 7 MEADOWBROOKHIGHWAY 7 COLORADOWO O D D A L E 36TH ST W WALKER ST BLAKE RD NLOUISIANA AVE SOXFOR D S T A Q U I L A A V E S WO O D D A L E A V E MEADOWBROOK RDLAKE ST W O a k P o n d S o u t h O a k P o n d 2030 Land Use Plan Map: City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 8b) Subject: Amending the Plan by Neighborhood Section of Comprehensive Plan Page 20 Environmental Stewardship 220 ComprehensivePlan IV. Why We Are A Livable Community F. Plan By Neighborhood - South Oak Hill Neighborhood IV-F220 ComprehensivePlan 2030 Comprehensive Plan Improvement Priorities • Land Use / Economic Development & Redevelopment »Commercial corridor study area – Excelsior Boulevard West »Neighborhood commercial node study area – None »Southwest Transitway station area – Louisiana • Housing »Potential housing growth area – Louisiana LRT station area, Walker-Lake area • Transportation »Transportation corridor study areas – CP Rail line »Future bikeways – Louisiana Ave, Texas Ave, Walker St/36th St »Future sidewalk gaps to be constructed – Louisiana Ave, 36th St »Future City trails – Minnehaha Creek (Excelsior Blvd/ Cty Rd 3 to Meadowbrook Rd), CP Rail line (potential regional trail) »Future pedestrian bridge – None »Future walk/bike street crossing improvements – Excelsior Blvd/Cty Rd 3 & Yosemite Ave »Future transit improvements – Louisiana Ave LRT station, transit shelter at Texas Ave & MN Hwy 7 »Freight Rail Relocation Study - Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority »North-south regional trail feasibility study - Three Rivers Park District South Oak Hill Neighborhood Improvement Opportunities (Identified by Neighborhood Process) • Consider rezoning industrial land on west side of South Oak Pond to non-industrial • Explore potential for relocating the railroad train switching functions • Fill in sidewalk gaps on arterial and collector streets, including on Texas Ave to connect to the Knollwood commercial center • Improve pedestrian crossing at MN Hwy 7 & Louisiana Ave • Provide an additional access to Edgebrook Park at intersection of Taft Ave & Edgebrook Drive • Explore potential for creating loop trail around South Oak Pond • Explore potential for regional trail in the CP Rail line • Explore potential for nature trails along Minnehaha Creek • Improve environmental quality and sustainability of Minnehaha Creek • Add park facilities to Edgebrook Park, such as tennis courts, pavilion/shelter with picnic tables, formal entrance • Add designated north-south bikeways in the neighborhood • Improve Cedar Lake LRT Regional Trail crossings of Wooddale Ave and Belt Line Blvd • Improve compatibility between the residential neighborhood and the industrial park and railroad tracks • Increase/improve retail businesses near the neighborhood, such as Knollwood, MN Hwy 7, and Louisiana Ave City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 8b) Subject: Amending the Plan by Neighborhood Section of Comprehensive Plan Page 21 Environmental Stewardship 221 ComprehensivePlan IV. Why We Are A Livable Community F. Plan By Neighborhood - South Oak Hill Neighborhood IV-F221 ComprehensivePlan Neighborhood Improvement Priorities Map: Louisiana OaksLouisiana Oaks Aquila ParkAquila Park Rec Center / Wolfe ParkRec Center / Wolfe Park Oak Hill ParkOak Hill Park Edgebrook ParkEdgebrook Park Texa-Tonka Park/Texa-Tonka Park/Lake VictoriaLake Victoria Browndale ParkBrowndale Park Ainsworth Ainsworth ParkPark Walker FieldWalker Field Birchwood Birchwood ParkPark Carpenter Park/Carpenter Park/ Skippy FieldSkippy Field Bronx ParkBronx Park Keystone Keystone ParkPark LILAC PARKLILAC PARK Oregon Oregon ParkPark Sunset Sunset ParkPark Center ParkCenter Park Roxbury Roxbury ParkPark Webster ParkWebster Park Freedom Park Freedom Park (Paul Frank)(Paul Frank) Elie Park/Elie Park/ Tower ParkTower Park Knollwood Knollwood GreenGreen Justad ParkJustad Park Isaac Walton League/CreeksideIsaac Walton League/Creekside Rainbow Rainbow ParkPark Jorvig ParkJorvig Park Sunshine ParkSunshine Park Jackley ParkJackley Park Town Green Town Green ParkPark Parkview Parkview ParkPark HIGHWAY 7 MINNETONKA LAKE 36TH 34TH 27TH WALKER 41STGEORGIAFLORIDAOXFOR D YOSEMITE37TH 1ST35TH WOOD D A L ERHODE ISLANDLI B R A R Y ALABAMA39TH2ND HIGHWAY 10028TH AQUILA31ST GORHAMVERNON26TH BRUNSWICKZARTHANTOLEDO32ND ZINRANMARYLAND42ND EXCELS I O R NORTH BROOKSIDESALEMWEBSTER40THXENWOOD BROOKDAKOTA29TH GOODRICH EDGEB R O O K 43 1/2BOONEDIVISION HAMILTON MACKEYMORNINGSIDE VALLA C H E R 30 1/2 34 1/2XYLON 44THYUKONRALEIGHBURDPOWELLCOOLIDGELOUISIANACAVELLTAFT35 1/2 COLORADOBR O W N L O W DARTWOLFE VICTORIASTANLEN 32 1/2 SERVICEBROWNDALE33RD PENNSYLVANIAHOSPITAL SERVICEMEADOWBROOKRE P U B L I C BLAKEPHILLIPSVERMONTINDEPENDENCEM O N I T O R PARK CENTERDECATURBLACKSTONEGLENO A K L E A F GETTYSBURGPRIVATE PARK C O M M O N SHILLSBORO WOOD 42 1/2 CAMBRIDGE GRANDWYOMINGMINNEHAHA EB HWY7 TO SB HWY169WOODLANDBROOKVIEWENSIGN TOLEDO AVE S TO NB HWY100 STEXA TONKA OAK PARK VILLAG E TARGET SERVICEPARK NICOLLETAUTO CLUB DEVANEY FREDE R I C K SUNSET RIDGEHOBARTOREGONBOONEXENWOODBRUNS W I C KFLAG32ND ALABAMARALEIGHPRIVATEZARTHANWYOMING37TH FLAG 28TH 42ND WALKERDAKOTA WYOMINGZARTHAN34THQUEBEC31ST PRINCETONYOSEMITEDAKOTACAVELL35TH RHODE ISLAND VIRGINIA43 1/2PRINCETON BROOK33RD YUKONYOSEMITE41ST SALEM31ST 32ND MEADOWBROOK WEBSTERBOONE29TH BLACKSTONEUTICAPRIVATE QUENTIN36TH BROWNDALEOTTAWAWEBSTER41STBRUNSWICKBLACKSTONEYOSEMITEZARTHANRHODE IS LAND DAKOTAHAMPSHIRERALEIGH 34THAQUILAGETTYSBURG QUEBECCOLORADOWEBSTERBOONEPRINCETONALABAMA31ST RALEIGHVIRGINIAWEBSTER31ST 33RD 42ND 33RD LOUISIANA SALEMNEVADAEDGEWOOD35TH 32ND UTAHHIGHWAY 7QUEBEC EDGEWOODSUMTERALABAMAJERSEYXENWOODPARK CENTER32ND IDAHOOXFORD TOLEDO29THAQUILAYUKONUTICA 33RD OTTAWAVERNON31ST ID A H OJORDAN WEBSTER29TH WOODDALETEXASPENNSYLVANIADECATURXENWOODXYLONCOLORADOBRUNSWICKSUMTERHILLSBOROGETTYSBURGQUEBEC36TH QUENTININDEPENDENCEXYLONUTAHQUENTINRHODE ISLANDSUMTERDAKOTA32ND RALEIGH26TH UTAHXYLONLAKEVIRGINIASALEMBOONEOTTAWA33RD 28TH 31 S T XENWOODG E O R G I AVIRGINIA TOLEDO27TH 39TH BRUNSWICKOREGONZINRAN37TH KENTUCKYQUEBEC28TH CAMBRIDGE PRINCETONENSIGNSALEM25THBOONE PENNSYLVANIA28TH HIGHWAY 7 EDGEWOODHIGHWAY 100MEADOWBROOK31STYOSEMITE HIGHWAY 7VIRGINIA OTTAWAZARTHANWEBSTERCOLORADOAQUILA29THBRUNSWICK RALEIGHWO O D D A L ECAVELL PRINCETONKnollwood Mall Methodist Hospital Park Nicollet Clinic Miracle Mile St. Louis Par k High Schoo l Rec Center Excelsior & Grand Texa-Tonka MallAquila Primary Center Municipal Svc Center Central Community Center Groves Learning Center Beth El SynagoguePeter Hobart Prim Center Police Station Cedar Manor Inter CenterWestwood Lutheran Church USPS - St. Louis Park South City Hall Susan Lindgren Inter Center Lenox Senior Center Brookside Condos Prince of Peace Lutheran Church Aldersgate Methodist St. George's Episcopal Evangelical Free Church Wooddale Evangelical Lutheran Hennepin County Library - SLP Fire Station 1 Church of the Holy Family Most Holy Trinity Church Holy Family School USPS - St. Louis Park North First Lutheran Church Luthern Church of the ReformerMINNETONKA BLVD BLAKE RD S36TH ST W HIGHWAY 100 SWALKER ST 5TH AVE NBLAKE RD NOAK RIDGE RDLOUISIANA AVE SOXFOR D S T DAKOTA AVE SYOSEMITE AVE SBROOKSIDE AVEA Q U I L A A V E S VIRGINIA AVE SWO O D D A L E A V E SWO O D D A L E A V E 5TH AVE SMEADOWBROOK RDNB HWY169 TO HWY7SB HWY100 TO 50TH ST WHWY7 TO NB HWY169 STOLEDO AVE S TO NB HWY100 S7TH ST S TO NB HWY169SB HWY169 TO 7TH ST SNB HWY100 S TO EXCELSIOR BLVDLAKE ST WTEXAS AVE S28TH ST W 36TH ST W Quest Academy Twin City Fellowship Slavic Church Emmanuel Calvary Worship Center Timothy Lutheran Church Knollwood Christian Church Anglican Church St. Dunstan's O a k P o n d S o u t h O a k P o n d City Council Meeting of November 21, 2011 (Item No. 8b) Subject: Amending the Plan by Neighborhood Section of Comprehensive Plan Page 22