HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011/02/07 - ADMIN - Agenda Packets - City Council - RegularAGENDA
FEBRUARY 7, 2011
(Mayor Jacobs out)
7:00 p.m. SPECIAL STUDY SESSION – Council Chambers
Discussion Items
1. 7:00 p.m. Finalize 2011 City Council Workshop Agenda
Written Reports
2. Report on Freight Rail Alternatives
7:30 p.m. CITY COUNCIL MEETING – Council Chambers
1. Call to Order
1a. Pledge of Allegiance
1b. Roll Call
2. Presentations - None
3. Approval of Minutes
3a. Study Session Minutes January 10, 2011
3b. City Council Minutes January 18, 2011
4. Approval of Agenda and Items on Consent Calendar
NOTE: The Consent Calendar lists those items of business which are considered to be routine and/or which need no
discussion. Consent items are acted upon by one motion. If discussion is desired by either a Councilmember or a
member of the audience, that item may be moved to an appropriate section of the regular agenda for discussion. The
items for the Consent Calendar are listed on the last page of the Agenda.
Recommended Action:
Motion to approve the agenda as presented and to approve items on the consent calendar.
(Alternatively: Motion to add or remove items from the agenda, motion to move items from consent
calendar to regular agenda for discussion and to approve those items remaining on the consent calendar.)
5. Boards and Commissions -- None
6. Public Hearings -- None
7. Requests, Petitions, and Communications from the Public – None
8. Resolutions, Ordinances, Motions and Discussion Items
8a. Resolution Approving Annual City Manager Evaluation.
Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution for formal acceptance of the final City
Manager annual evaluation.
8b. Resolution Approving 2011 Compensation for the City Manager
Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution confirming a 2.25% general increase for the
City Manager effective January 1, 2011.
Meeting of February 7, 2011
Special Study Session and City Council Agenda
9. Communication
Immediately Following City Council Meeting
CONTINUED SPECIAL STUDY SESSION – Council Chambers
Discussion Items
3. Highway 100 Project Update
Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. To make arrangements, please call
the Administration Department at 952/924-2525 (TDD 952/924-2518) at least 96 hours in advance of meeting.
Meeting of February 7, 2011
Special Study Session and City Council Agenda
4. CONSENT CALENDAR
4a. Approve Resolution for 2011 Liquor License Renewals for the license year term of March
1, 2011 through March 1, 2012
4b. Adopt Resolution approving acceptance of donation from Microsoft for Home Use and E-
Learning Programs
4c. Adopt Resolution rescinding prior 2-way traffic controls and authorizing new 4-way traffic
controls at Yosemite Avenue & West 42nd Street
4d. Adopt Resolution authorizing “No Left Turns 7-9 a.m. and 4-6 p.m.” on Yosemite
Avenue, south of Excelsior Boulevard
4e. Adopt Resolution authorizing the installation of a 4-way stop condition at W. 16th Street
West and Duke Drive
4f. Adopt Resolution authorizing final payment in the amount of $97,990.80 and accepting
work for the 2010 Local Street Rehabilitation - Pavement Management Area 6 Repair with
Valley Paving, Inc. Project No. 2009-1000, City Contract No. 52-10
4g. Adopt Resolution authorizing final payment in the amount of $14,674.70 for the 2010
MSA Street Improvement Project - Texas Avenue with PCI Roads, LLC, Project No.
2008-1100 - City Contract No. 128-10
4h. Approve for Filing Park and Recreation Advisory Commission Minutes December 1, 2010
4i. Approve for Filing Human Rights Commission Minutes December 21, 2010
4j. Approve for Filing Vendor Claims.
St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority and regular City Council meetings are carried live on Civic TV
cable channel 17 and replays are frequent; check www.parktv.org for the schedule. The meetings are also streamed
live on the internet at www.parktv.org, and saved for Video on Demand replays. The agenda is posted on Fridays
on the official city bulletin board in the lobby of City Hall and on the text display on Civic TV cable channel 17.
The agenda and full packet are available by noon on Friday on the city’s website.
Meeting Date: February 7, 2011
Agenda Item #: 1
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other: SPECIAL
TITLE:
Finalize 2011 City Council Workshop Agenda.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff requests Council direction on the proposed agenda which has been prepared for the City
Council’s annual workshop based on feedback received from the Council in January, 2011.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Is Council in agreement with the agenda as proposed?
BACKGROUND:
Based on feedback received from the City Council, staff is proposing that the Council conduct a
one day workshop on Saturday, March 12 and discuss three specific topic areas (see attached
agenda for more details):
Carver Governance Model
City Council Communications
Go deeper on a specific topic identified by the Council
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
The practice of the City Council has been to use an off-site facility for the workshop and keep
costs to a minimum. This same approach is proposed for this coming workshop and is budgeted
for accordingly.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable
Attachment: Draft Agenda
Summary of Survey Results from January 2011
Prepared by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
Special Study Session Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 1) Page 2
Subject: Finalize 2011 City Council Workshop Agenda
City Council Workshop
Saturday, March 12, 2011
(9:00 a.m. – 3:00 p.m.)
Location to be Determined
AGENDA DRAFT
Outcomes
To review the Carver Governance Model
To develop our own Communications Standards per our discussion on October 11th
To go deep not broad on a specific topic
1. Carver Governance Model (9:00 a.m. – 10:30 a.m.)
Bring in Jim Brimeyer to review the governance model and lead a dialogue about how it
works for the St. Louis Park City Council. Carver recommends that Councils and Boards
reflect and recommit on a regular basis.
2. Council Communications (10: 45a.m. – 12:15 p.m.)
Spend time discussing our communication: including dealing with how we disagree, how
we send and receive messages. Develop the way we want to communicate with each
other as we go forward. Possibly use an outside facilitator for this.
LUNCH: (12:15 p.m. – 12:45 p.m.)
3. Go deep into discussion on one of the projects/issues identified from the Council survey
(12:45 p.m. – 2:45 p.m.)
City budget and/or the State budget crisis and how it impacts us;
Louisiana & Hwy 7;
Civic Facilities;
Select another topic. Council can select one of these topics or put in another area
of interest.
4. Recap of the Day (2:45 – 3:00 p.m.)
5. Adjournment (3:00 p.m.)
Special Study Session Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 1) Page 3
Subject: Finalize 2011 City Council Workshop Agenda
SUMMARY OF SURVEY RESULTS
January, 2011
What do you need/want to make this a successful workshop?
We really need to work on our relationships as a governing body and how we are
working together. We all feel it.
Some substantive discussion about how the economy may impact us - levy limits,
downturn in commercial real estate, Nestle closing (other large employers?).
All CC members should attend and actively participate.
Also, while nobody wants any more touchy feely stuff, we really need to figure out a way
to communicate with each better.
All CC members should not try to avoid or minimize conflicts; instead try to understand
and acknowledge the substance and issues.
Participation from all council members - if we don't have full attendance we should re-
schedule.
All CC members should commit to providing their input and perspectives on issues
discussed.
Chairs and setting need to accommodate those of us with bad backs.
I think it is important that it be scheduled so everyone can attend the entire session.
Reduce the touchy/feely components; increase the communication skills and
information/policy discussion side.
Using the following as examples, please identify the top three things you would like covered
in the workshop?
Carver Governance Model (how we work as a board) (3 requests)
Audience norms (1 request)
Council alternatives for future communication per meeting minutes of October 11, 2010
(3 requests)
Roles and responsibilities of Council and Staff (2 requests)
Long range financial planning/future financial outlook & service delivery (2 requests)
Special Study Session Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 1) Page 4
Subject: Finalize 2011 City Council Workshop Agenda
Big picture project(s) on the horizon (such as Highway 7 & Louisiana, Civic Facilities,
etc.)
o And, how we fund them
o Big picture projects—civic facilities and freight rail
o (Please write in.)
Safety for city, staff and officials—a safety audit.
As we proceed to deal with freight issues, it would be helpful to have an
agreement on how we will have these discussions and how we might
disagree. E.g., respectfully disagreeing is fine, but doing it by saying
things like "you are misinformed" or "your statements are misleading"
rather than simply saying "I disagree with that outlook or those
perceptions" or "I have a different understanding" will stoke the fire of
dissension and make it harder to have civil discussions. I have been guilty
of this at times, as certainly other council members have, but I fear that
without truly laying out and articulating how we might disagree, these
conversations could be divisive. As a council it is important that can
disagree and be respectful at the same time.
Other (Please write in.)
o State budget crisis and effect on both city budgets and city services and the
potential effect of a state shut-down in the summer. This is not the same as long
range fiscal planning. It is about the state crisis.
What else do you want to tell us that would make this workshop valuable for you?
My big concern is that as we proceed, we should have an understanding of how we
communicate publicly and how we disagree.
It's hard to measure success in these kinds of things but if we can come to some real,
enforceable understandings about how not to vilify each other that'd be fantastic.
I would love to come out of this with a long range plan. We need some tangible goals we and
staff can work on for the coming year. However, with this group I'll be satisfied if they just
come out smiling at each other.
I would rather do fewer things in depth rather than skim the surface of several items.
Technology can be a problem. Help us with that part of organizing and keep everything
straight.
Meeting Date: February 7, 2011
Agenda Item #: 2
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Report on Freight Rail Alternatives.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
No action required at this time. The purpose of this report is to provide a written explanation of
the recommendations by the City’s freight rail consultant for carrying some of the freight route
options forward, and for not moving forward on several of the options. Additional analysis on
the remaining freight route options will be presented at the City Council’s Study Session on
February 14th. This work is being completed to help the City Council determine what alternative
is in the long term best interest of the City of St. Louis Park.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
The City’s consultant will move forward with reviewing the options recommended for further
study for the February 14, 2011 study session. Please share any questions or comments with
staff and they will be forwarded on to the consultant.
BACKGROUND:
On December 13, 2010, the City Council heard a freight rail background report from the City’s
rail consultant Dave McKenzie from SEH, Inc. Some alternatives were recommended for further
study, others were not. SEH was directed to prepare a report documenting the alternative freight
rail routes to be dropped from consideration and to begin further study of the others.
Attached is the report as requested. It includes a table showing the recommendation from SEH
with a table showing the evaluation criteria for each of the route alternatives from the Amfahr
and R.L. Banks studies completed by the County.
NEXT STEPS:
At the City Council Study Session on February 14, 2011, there will be a presentation and
discussion on additional analysis which has been undertaken of the remaining alternative routes
under consideration. These alternatives are:
1. Co-locating freight rail, light rail and regional trail in Kenilworth;
2. Co-locating freight rail and light rail in Kenilworth and moving the regional trail;
3. Utilizing freight rate subsidies for TCW to operate on routes west of the metro; and
4. Utilizing the MNS route.
All of the information necessary to fully evaluate all the remaining alternatives is not yet
available and therefore the analysis is not expected to be fully completed by February 14th.
Some key information will not be available until the MNS Study is completed (March-April
timeframe). SEH will evaluate the information and update the remaining options at that time.
This will allow a comparison of all of the options side by side along with pros and cons of each.
Special Study Session Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 2) Page 2
Subject: Report on Freight Rail Alternatives
Update on MNS Study
The MNS Freight Rail Study began in July 2010 and is funded by MNDOT and Hennepin
County. The purpose of this study is essentially to answer these questions - If TCW trains were
to be routed to the MNS tracks, what improvements would be needed to make it happen, what
would the impacts be, and what mitigation would be needed to address negative impacts? The
study includes preparation of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the proposed
route. While the study was to initially be wrapped up in December 2010, it has been extended to
include additional time for public input and comment. The EAW for the MNS route is expected
to be completed in March or April, at which time there will be a 30-day comment period. The
next Project Management Team (PMT) meeting will be February 24th. At that time noise
impacts, mitigation, and cost estimates are expected to be presented.
Meetings with Business Owners
On February 8th and 9th the City is hosting a meeting with area business and commercial or
industrial property owners along the MNS route in order to update and inform them of the study,
EAW, and options for participating in the process. Bruce Hasselbring with Ace Supply and Curt
Rahman, a commercial property owner on Lake St., will represent businesses on the PMT as
well.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
The primary financial impact of the freight rail studies for the City is staff time and consultant
expense necessary to review documents and provide input. As we move forward costs will be
incurred for consultants to assist the city. The exact amount is difficult to estimate at this time.
Funding would come from the Development Fund.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
SWLRT, Freight Rail planning and station area planning are consistent with the City’s strategic
vision to be a connected and engaged community; as well as leaders in environmental
stewardship.
Attachments: SEH Freight Options Report
Prepared by: Meg McMonigal, Planning and Zoning Supervisor
Kevin Locke, Community Development Director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
Special Study Session Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 2)
Subject: Report on Freight Rail Alternatives Page 3
Special Study Session Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 2)
Subject: Report on Freight Rail Alternatives Page 4
Special Study Session Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 2)
Subject: Report on Freight Rail Alternatives Page 5
Special Study Session Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 2)
Subject: Report on Freight Rail Alternatives Page 6
Special Study Session Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 2)
Subject: Report on Freight Rail Alternatives Page 7
Special Study Session Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 2)
Subject: Report on Freight Rail Alternatives Page 8
Special Study Session Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 2)
Subject: Report on Freight Rail Alternatives Page 9
Special Study Session Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 2)
Subject: Report on Freight Rail Alternatives Page 10
Special Study Session Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 2)
Subject: Report on Freight Rail Alternatives Page 11
Special Study Session Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 2)
Subject: Report on Freight Rail Alternatives Page 12
Special Study Session Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 2)
Subject: Report on Freight Rail Alternatives Page 13
Special Study Session Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 2)
Subject: Report on Freight Rail Alternatives Page 14
Special Study Session Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 2)
Subject: Report on Freight Rail Alternatives Page 15
Special Study Session Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 2)
Subject: Report on Freight Rail Alternatives Page 16
Special Study Session Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 2)
Subject: Report on Freight Rail Alternatives Page 17
Special Study Session Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 2)
Subject: Report on Freight Rail Alternatives Page 18
Special Study Session Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 2)
Subject: Report on Freight Rail Alternatives Page 19
Special Study Session Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 2)
Subject: Report on Freight Rail Alternatives Page 20
Special Study Session Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 2)
Subject: Report on Freight Rail Alternatives Page 21
Special Study Session Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 2)
Subject: Report on Freight Rail Alternatives Page 22
Special Study Session Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 2)
Subject: Report on Freight Rail Alternatives Page 23
Special Study Session Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 2)
Subject: Report on Freight Rail Alternatives Page 24
Special Study Session Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 2)
Subject: Report on Freight Rail Alternatives Page 25
Special Study Session Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 2)
Subject: Report on Freight Rail Alternatives Page 26
Meeting Date: February 7, 2011
Agenda Item #: 3a
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
JANUARY 10, 2011
The meeting convened at 6:32 p.m.
Councilmembers present: Mayor Jeff Jacobs, Phil Finkelstein (arrived at 6:45 p.m.), Anne
Mavity, Julia Ross (arrived at 6:40 p.m.), and Sue Santa.
Councilmembers absent: Paul Omodt and Susan Sanger.
Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), Deputy City Manager/Human Resources Director
(Ms. Gohman), City Clerk (Ms. Stroth), Director of Inspections (Mr. Hoffman), Director of
Public Works (Mr. Rardin), Utilities Superintendent (Mr. Anderson), Engineering Program
Coordinator (Ms. Adler), Environmental Coordinator (Mr. Vaughan), Communications
Coordinator (Mr. Zwilling), and Recording Secretary (Ms. Hughes).
Guests: Doug Franzen and Vic Moore (Franzen & Associates), Emily Tranter (Lockridge,
Grindal, and Nauen), Gail Dorfman (Hennepin County Commissioner), Representative Steve
Simon, Representative Ryan Winkler, and Senator Ron Latz.
1. Future Study Session Agenda Planning – January 24, 2011
Mr. Harmening presented the proposed study session agenda for January 24th.
2. 2011 Annual Legislative Update
Mr. Harmening presented the staff report and introduced Doug Franzen, Vic Moore, Emily
Tranter, Rep. Ryan Winkler, and Rep. Steve Simon. He advised that the City has been
aggressive in all the engineering work for the Highway 7/Louisiana Avenue project based on the
assumption that funding will be made available, noting that $10 million is currently available out
of the $22 million needed for the project. He stated that if the project is not underway by 2012,
the City could lose almost $8 million in Federal funds. He also discussed the reassignment of
bonding bill proceeds and stated that $700,000 was approved in 2006 for the Glencoe project but
the City has been unable to pull together the rest of the funding for this $4 million project.
Mr. Moore advised that the current law requires that once bonding is authorized by the
legislature, if the funding is not issued within five years, the Department of Management and
Budget has to submit a cancellation of the project to the legislature on January. He indicated the
need for asking the legislature to reauthorize the Glencoe project or substitute it for another
project that benefits the City. He also indicated that gaining approval for a reauthorization or
substitution was not likely.
Councilmember Mavity expressed concern that recent drawings show Highway 100 emptying
out onto Minnetonka Boulevard and reconnecting to Highway 7.
Mr. Rardin advised that Mn/DOT is in the process of rating various design alternatives for the
project. He stated that staff will attend a meeting this week with Mn/DOT officials and the
County to look at the matrix of all the rating criteria to see which one is the strongest and to see
how the alternatives affect the City’s local system as well as light rail and light rail station
planning. He added that the bridges are all scheduled to be replaced.
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item 3a) Page 2
Subject: Study Session Minutes of January 10, 2011
It was the consensus of the City Council to request that Senator Latz and/or Representatives
Winkler and Simon meet with the Governor and/or the Governor’s policy lead for transportation
regarding the Highway 100 project. Discussion took place regarding other various
representatives to be invited.
Councilmember Finkelstein expressed concerns with respect to the fiscal disparities pool and
stated that the City has been successful in its economic development efforts but is punished for
its efforts because its share of the fiscal disparities pool continues to increase requiring the City
to levy additional amounts to taxpayers.
Mr. Franzen stated that fiscal disparities as well as LGA and MVHC will likely be discussed at
the legislature.
Councilmember Mavity requested further information regarding the proposed legislation to de-
regulate pawn shops.
Mr. Harmening stated that no specific legislation has been introduced. He indicated that Chief
Luse is concerned about any legislation to de-regulate pawn shops and stated that the City has a
successful track record with the use of the Automated Pawn System. He added that Excel Pawn
has been a very good partner with the City in reporting suspected stolen merchandise.
Councilmember Ross requested further information regarding right of entry for inspections on
private properties that are rental properties.
Mr. Hoffman advised that the City has the right to enter a rental property with the property
owner who has a right of entry. He stated that staff is unaware of any pending legislation to
change the current laws.
Representative Simon asked if the final configuration of Highway 7 and Louisiana had been
selected and whether the City would be seeking bonding dollars for the project.
Mr. Rardin stated that the preferred alternative is moving through the preliminary design phase
and environmental analysis with expectations that Mn/DOT will approve and sign-off on the
project in February.
Mr. Harmening stated that the City’s most recent funding application to Mn/DOT was not
approved. He indicated that the City has spent approximately $500,000 on design work to keep
this project on track and if funding is not secured, the City will lose its investment in the project.
He added that the City has the ability to apply for an extension to 2013, but must show continued
progress on the project, requiring the City to expend more money to bring the project to the final
design point without knowing if additional funding will be available.
Representative Simon stated that a bonding bill request for this project is highly unlikely to be
successful in the upcoming legislative session.
Commissioner Dorfman questioned whether the City could apply for funding dollars if the City
were to change the bus connections and had bus connections to light rail.
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item 3a) Page 3
Subject: Study Session Minutes of January 10, 2011
Councilmember Finkelstein asked if it would make sense to schedule a meeting with
Representative Ellison’s staff.
Ms. Tranter agreed that a meeting with Representative Ellison would be helpful and noted that
Representative Ellison is very aware of and supportive of this project but funding is limited.
Mr. Harmening indicated that this topic will be on the Council’s agenda for discussion in
February or March.
Commissioner Dorfman stated that the TwinWest and Minneapolis Chambers of Commerce
have come forward and asked what they can do to help with respect to light rail and to make sure
that no moratorium is put in place on planning for light rail. She stated that the legislature
approved $5 million in 2009 for light rail; there is currently approximately $30 million on the
table for SWLRT, which will take the project through the first year and a half of preliminary
engineering and the continuing environmental impact process. She added that she hopes to see
$13.6 million from the State for this project.
Mr. Moore stated that a meeting has been scheduled with the chairs of the House and Senate
Bonding Committees on Wednesday. He asked if the City should ask them to introduce
legislation on the reauthorization of the bonding bill proceeds.
It was the consensus of the City Council to direct Mr. Moore to inquire if legislation regarding
reauthorization of the bonding bill proceeds would be worthwhile.
Mayor Jacobs expressed the City Council’s thanks to Mr. Franzen, Mr. Moore, and Ms. Tranter,
along with Senator Latz, Representative Simon, Representative Winkler, and Commissioner
Dorfman for their efforts on behalf of the City.
Mayor Jacobs recessed the study session at 7:41 p.m.
Mayor Jacobs reconvened the study session at 7:45 p.m.
3. Storm Water/Surface Water Management
Ms. Gohman presented the staff report.
Mr. Anderson presented an overview of the City’s storm water system and presented a depiction
of the City’s current storm water system and subdistricts where the water drains. He indicated
that the current system was put together in a piecemeal fashion, which creates difficulties for the
City. He advised that staff recently completed an inventory and rating of the City’s catch basins,
and that the City currently performs approximately 65 total rebuilds of catch basins per year. He
stated that the storm water capital improvement plan is coordinated with the pavement
management program.
Ms. Adler discussed water quantity, including flooding and storm water definitions of ten year
and 100 year events. She also discussed flood plains and FEMA, stating that a flood plain is
determined and delineated by FEMA and is associated with a larger body of water, either a lake,
stream, or river and is based on 100 year events or larger. She stated the City has approximately
10% flood plain area, mostly around Minnehaha Creek.
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item 3a) Page 4
Subject: Study Session Minutes of January 10, 2011
Councilmember Finkelstein requested that staff provide Council with a flood plain map of the
City.
Mr. Anderson stated that the City is anticipating more street flooding due to the heavy snow fall
and staff has been working to identify known low areas.
Ms. Adler discussed the City’s flood proofing grant program that was funded by the DNR to
assist homeowners in floodproofing their homes.
Mr. Vaughan presented an overview of the various organizations involved in handling storm
water, including the Met Council, MPCA, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD), and
Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission (BCWMC). He stated that MCWD and
BCWMC act as the Local Government Unit responsible for administering the Wetland
Conservation Act, which includes a requirement to achieve no net loss of Minnesota’s existing
wetlands. He discussed the requirements of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES), Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System, and Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWPPP). He stated that the City has completed its SWPPP five year plan document available
online consisting of 6 minimum control measures including education/ public outreach and
pollution prevention/good housekeeping measures. He discussed Total Maximum Daily Loads
(TMDL), noting that a TMDL is the sum of the individual waste loads from point sources, non-
point sources, and natural background which determines the capacity of the impaired water body
to assimilate pollutant loadings and still meet water quality standards. He indicated the impaired
waters in St. Louis Park include Twin Lakes, Bass Lake, Cobblecrest Lake, and Minnehaha
Creek.
Ms. Adler stated that the City currently meets all regulatory requirements of all the various
agencies and staff continues to monitor its policies and practices to reflect current requirements,
including water quality monitoring, additional public education on storm water bodies,
vegetation management, shoreline management, and aesthetics of storm water ponds.
Councilmember Mavity stated that it will be important for the City to remain proactive in its use
of rain gardens and other types of storm water management to try to mimic nature as closely as
possible and to keep the water in place versus trying to move water away as quickly as possible.
Ms. Adler discussed several water quality projects undertaken by the City, including storm sewer
maintenance and replacement as well as street sweeping. She stated that additional projects
include the Westdale pond project with the BCWMC, Lamplighter Pond, fish stocking of the
lakes, rain gardens, and the Minnehaha Creek remeander.
Councilmember Mavity stated that the vegetation management at Bass Lake has been raised in
the past. She requested further information regarding the City’s decision-making process as it
relates to silt removal, vegetation removal, and/or stocking of fish.
Mr. Anderson advised that the City is in the process of performing an inventory of all ponds in
the City and studying the function of the ponds to determine if they are working as designed.
The study also identifies and prioritizes activities to improve the functions of the ponds.
Councilmember Finkelstein stated that concerns have been raised by residents regarding the
general condition of some of the ponds, including the pond scum and resulting smell.
Councilmember Ross requested an update regarding Victoria Ponds.
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item 3a) Page 5
Subject: Study Session Minutes of January 10, 2011
Ms. Adler stated that the Victoria Ponds development has four small ponds and each pond drains
out to one pipe that goes across Virginia Avenue and into Lake Victoria. She explained that the
slopes on the sides of the ponds are sloughing in and the property owners are working to
determine how to stabilize the slopes, including some regrading. She pointed out that the ponds
are owned by the townhome association and are not maintained by the City.
It was the consensus of the City Council to schedule a further discussion regarding the water
quality associated with the water bodies in the City’s neighborhoods and parks, from a functional
perspective, including treatment options and costs associated with treatment.
Councilmember Ross requested that this discussion include a prioritization of projects.
Councilmember Santa requested that this discussion also include the City’s wetlands.
4. Communications/Meeting Check-in (Verbal)
Mr. Harmening stated that Mr. Brimeyer would be applying for a position on the Met Council
and has requested letters of support from the Council.
It was the consensus of the City Council to direct staff to prepare a letter of support for Mr.
Brimeyer to be signed by Mayor Jacobs on behalf of the entire City Council.
Mr. Harmening stated that a brief survey will be sent to the Council in preparation for the
Council Workshop in March; the survey will be discussed by Council on January 24th.
Councilmember Mavity reported that she would like to serve as the EDA representative on the
West Metro Workforce Investment Board and requested that the Council provide her with a letter
of recommendation.
Mr. Harmening agreed to prepare a letter of recommendation for Councilmember Mavity and to
have Councilmember Finkelstein, as President of the Economic Development Authority, sign the
letter on behalf of the entire EDA.
Councilmember Ross expressed her appreciation to City staff for their fantastic job of plowing
snow. She stated she was recently traveling on the 66th and Portland roundabout in Richfield and
expressed concern about the difficulty in maneuvering through the roundabout because of the
high snow banks. She requested that the City keep this in mind when planning for the
roundabouts on Highway 7 and Louisiana Avenue.
The meeting adjourned at 9:07 p.m.
Written Reports provided and documented for recording purposes only:
5. Business Terms for Development Contract between the EDA and CKJ Properties,
LLC – 3540 Dakota Ave. South (former Bikemasters Building)
6. Highway 7/Louisiana Avenue Interchange Project Update
______________________________________ ______________________________________
Nancy Stroth, City Clerk Jeff Jacobs, Mayor
Meeting Date: February 7, 2011
Agenda Item #: 3b
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
JANUARY 18, 2011
1. Call to Order
Mayor Jacobs called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
Councilmembers present: Mayor Jeff Jacobs, Phil Finkelstein, Anne Mavity, Paul Omodt, and
Sue Santa.
Councilmembers absent: Councilmember Julia Ross and Susan Sanger.
Staff present: Deputy City Manager/Human Resources Director (Ms. Gohman), Senior Planner
(Mr. Walther), Director of Community Development (Mr. Locke), Economic Development
Coordinator (Mr. Hunt), Director of Parks and Recreation (Ms. Walsh), Park Superintendent
(Mr. Beane), Organizational Development Coordinator (Ms. Gothberg), Police Lieutenant (Ms.
Dreier), Community Liaison (Ms. Olson), and Recording Secretary (Ms. Hughes).
1a. Pledge of Allegiance
1b. Roll Call
2. Presentations
2a. Human Rights Award Presentation
Mayor Jacobs asked the City Council to join the Human Rights Commission in awarding
Sharon and Neil Anderson and “The Inside Look” as the 2010 Human Rights Award
recipients. He explained that each year, the Human Rights Commission coordinates an
award to honor individuals that contribute to increasing understanding and cooperation
between people of different backgrounds and award recipients are recognized as leaders
who support the City’s vision of creating a community in which diversity is a natural part
of everyday life. He stated that Sharon and Neil Anderson have made a lifelong
commitment to understanding and cooperation of human rights within St. Louis Park and
beyond and have done so much over the years and continue to make human rights a
priority.
Mr. and Mrs. Anderson expressed their thanks to the City Council and the Human Rights
Commission for this award.
Mayor Jacobs stated that a talk show was created by St. Louis Park High School students
called “The Inside Look” which tackles social issues present in today’s communities. He
indicated that the talk show is providing St. Louis Park youth with an opportunity to
voice their opinions and discuss difficult social issues. He added that the first show aired
in November addressing race misconceptions and caused students to re-evaluate racial
stereotypes; and over 500 students attended the viewing during school hours.
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item 3b) Page 2
Subject: City Council Minutes of January 18, 2011
Mr. Kyle Rucker, Executive Director of Project Footsteps organization that sponsors
these types of projects, introduced several of the students involved with “The Inside
Look”. He indicated that the students have taken ownership of a movement that will shift
the culture of their school and community in a way that is inclusive of everyone without
pointing fingers, and he congratulated the students on their work.
Candace, a student at the St. Louis Park High School and member of “The Inside Look”
thanked the City Council and Human Rights Commission for this award. She invited
everyone to view the next episode of “The Inside Look” on Thursday, January 27th at the
High School. She added the show will also air on the cable access channel.
Mayor Jacobs expressed the City Council’s congratulations and thanks to the award
recipients. He also asked the City Council to recognize the efforts of Ms. Olson and
Lieutenant Dreier, as well as the Human Rights Commission.
3. Approval of Minutes
3a. Joint City Council/School Board Meeting Minutes November 29, 2010
The minutes were approved as presented.
3b. Special Study Session Minutes December 20, 2010
The minutes were approved as presented.
3c. City Council Meeting Minutes December 20, 2010
Councilmember Finkelstein requested that a paragraph be added before the first full
paragraph on page 8 that states “Councilmember Finkelstein noted that 26 out of 32
suburbs with over a 1.5 million population have a CVB and charge a lodging tax.”
The minutes were approved as amended.
3d. City Council Meeting Minutes January 3, 2011
The minutes were approved as presented.
4. Approval of Agenda and Items on Consent Calendar
NOTE: The Consent Calendar lists those items of business which are considered to be routine
and/or which need no discussion. Consent items are acted upon by one motion. If discussion is
desired by either a Councilmember or a member of the audience, that item may be moved to an
appropriate section of the regular agenda for discussion.
4a. Adopt Resolution No. 11-012 authorizing the special assessment for the repair of
the sewer service line at 1800 Maryland Avenue South, St. Louis Park, MN -
P.I.D. 05-117-21-34-0092.
4b. Adopt Resolution No. 11-013 authorizing the special assessment for the repair of
the sewer service line at 3033 Florida Avenue South, St. Louis Park, MN - P.I.D.
17-117-21-11-0035.
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item 3b) Page 3
Subject: City Council Minutes of January 18, 2011
4c. Approve Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance No. 2397-11 approving the
Vacation of a portion of street right-of-way at Oxford Street and Wooddale
Avenue South, and approve the summary ordinance for publication.
4d. Adopt Resolution No. 11-014 certifying the special assessment for the Property
Restoration Project in the amount of $7,635.
4e. Adopt Resolution No. 11-015 authorizing execution of a one (1) year contract
with AECOM Technical Services, Inc. for consultant services related to the
implementation of the Reilly Tar & Chemical Corporation (Reilly) Remedial
Action Plan (RAP) during year 2011.
4f. Adopt Resolution No. 11-016 approving a Minor Amendment to the Final PUD
for the West End Redevelopment Project.
4g. Approve Amendment No. 2 to Contract 142-08 which provides additional
engineering consulting services for the Highway 7 / Louisiana Avenue
Interchange project, Project No. 2012-0100.
4h. Approve for Filing Human Rights Commission Minutes August 17, 2010.
4i. Approve for Filing Human Rights Commission Minutes October 19, 2010.
4j. Approve for Filing Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission Minutes September
22, 2010.
4k. Approve for Filing Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission Minutes October
20, 2010.
4l. Approve for Filing Police Advisory Commission Minutes November 3, 2010.
It was moved by Councilmember Santa, seconded by Councilmember Omodt, to approve
the Agenda and items listed on the Consent Calendar; and to waive reading of all
resolutions and ordinances.
The motion passed 5-0 (Councilmembers Ross and Sanger absent).
5. Boards and Commissions - None
6. Public Hearings - None
7. Requests, Petitions, and Communications from the Public – None
8. Resolutions, Ordinances, Motions and Discussion Items
8a. Northside Park Approval of Plans and Specifications, and Authorize Bids
Resolution No. 11-017
Ms. Walsh presented the staff report and noted that the redevelopment of Northside Park
is being done in conjunction with the construction of Fire Station No. 2. She discussed
the planned improvements and stated that the redevelopment does not include
replacement of the hockey rink due to construction of the new fire station. She noted that
a new warming house was built in 2010 at Birchwood Park which has been well received
and heavily used for general skating and hockey. She stated that the redevelopment
includes relocating three baseball fields, relocating and reconstructing of the parking lot,
as well as installation of curb and gutter to comply with watershed district regulations and
to create a storm water ponding area. She advised that the City has received a $400,000
grant from the Hennepin Youth Sports; the anticipated cost of the project is $1.2 million,
with $800,000 coming from the Park Improvement Fund. She added that construction
will begin in the spring and the park will be ready for use in 2012.
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item 3b) Page 4
Subject: City Council Minutes of January 18, 2011
Mayor Jacobs congratulated staff and the Parks and Recreation Commission for their
work on this project and stated that the planned improvements will be a welcome
addition.
It was moved by Councilmember Santa, seconded by Councilmember Omodt, to adopt
Resolution No. 11-017 Accepting the Project Report, Establishing Improvement Project
No. 20110050 Approving Plans and Specifications, and Authorizing Advertisement for
Bids.
The motion passed 5-0 (Councilmembers Ross and Sanger absent).
8b. Second Reading – Ordinance Providing for Domestic Partner Voluntary
Registration Program
Ordinance No. 2398-11
Ms. Gohman presented the staff report.
Councilmember Finkelstein expressed support for this ordinance and stated that the City
Council and City staff made a courageous decision to support this ordinance. He
mentioned the Human Rights Awards that were presented earlier and the full room of
people with diverse backgrounds. He stated that this is especially important in light of
Martin Luther King, Jr. and everything he did to expand civil rights. He requested that
the record reflect that communications were received that opposed this ordinance, and
noted that this ordinance will not affect anyone’s personal interest.
It was moved by Councilmember Finkelstein, seconded by Councilmember Mavity, to
approve Second Reading and adopt Ordinance No. 2398-11 adding Chapter 5 to the St.
Louis Park City Code Concerning Domestic Partners.
The motion passed 5-0 (Councilmembers Ross and Sanger absent).
9. Communications
Mayor Jacobs expressed the City Council’s thanks to the City’s snow removal crews who
have been working hard to remove snow. He asked for the public’s cooperation and
patience as City crews do their best to stay ahead of it.
Councilmember Santa expressed the City Council’s thanks to those residents who have
taken it upon themselves to keep the City’s fire hydrants, bus stops, and walkways free
and clear for people to get around.
10. Adjournment
The meeting adjourned at 8:03 p.m.
______________________________________ ______________________________________
Nancy Stroth, City Clerk Jeff Jacobs, Mayor
Meeting Date: February 7, 2011
Agenda Item #: 4a
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
2011 Liquor License Renewals.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to approve Resolution for 2011 Liquor License Renewals for the license year term of
March 1, 2011 through March 1, 2012.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Does Council wish to approve renewal of liquor licenses for the next year’s term?
BACKGROUND:
The City has received the required information from 45 of the 46 current liquor license
establishments for renewal of their liquor license. Staff is still waiting to receive all of the
required information from Toby Keith I Love This Bar. The required documents include state
and city renewal applications, liquor liability insurance certificates, certificate of compliance of
Minnesota Workers’ Compensation Law and license fees.
Action on the liquor license renewal for Toby Keith I Love This Bar will be submitted separately
for Council consideration at the February 22 City Council Meeting.
During the year 2010, the following new liquor licenses were approved:
• Rojo Mexican Grill received an intoxicating on-sale liquor license with Sunday sales.
• Toby Keith’s I love this Bar & Grill received an intoxicating on-sale liquor license with
Sunday sales.
• Thanh Do received an on-sale wine and 3.2 malt liquor license at their new location.
• Wok in the Park received an on-sale wine and 3.2 malt liquor license.
Other liquor license changes since last year’s renewal period are as follows:
• Ringo and Sauce Pizza and Wine received on-sale wine and 3.2 malt liquor licenses
during 2010 and have since closed their businesses.
• Fuddruckers closed their business.
• Timber Lodge Steakhouse closed their business.
• Applebee’s, Grand City Buffet and Liquor Barrel had new ownership during the year of
2010.
Liquor License establishments listed in this report have met the criteria necessary for issuance of
their respective liquor licenses.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
Fees received for liquor license renewals are budgeted as revenues each year and defray the cost
the City experiences to administer and enforce liquor licensing codes and requirements.
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 4a) Page 2
Subject: 2011 Liquor License Renewals
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Not Applicable
Attachments: Resolution
Exhibit A
Prepared by: Kris Luedke, Office Assistant
Reviewed by: Nancy Stroth, City Clerk
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 4a) Page 3
Subject: 2011 Liquor License Renewals
RESOLUTION NO. 11- _____
RESOLUTION APPROVING ISSUANCE OF
LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWALS
FOR MARCH 1, 2011 THROUGH MARCH 1, 2012
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 340A and St. Louis Park Ordinance Code
Chapter 3 provide for liquor licensing in cooperation with the Alcohol and Gambling
Enforcement Division of the Minnesota Department of Public Safety, and
WHEREAS, no license may be issued or renewed if required criteria has not been met,
and
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City of St. Louis Park City Council
that the applicants and establishments listed in Exhibit A have met the criteria necessary for
issuance of their respective liquor licenses, and the applications are hereby approved for March
1, 2011 to March 1, 2012.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council February 7, 2011
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 4a) Page 4
Subject: 2011 Liquor License Renewals
Resolution No. 11-_____ 2011 Liquor License Renewals EXHIBIT A
Licensee Name Business Name Address License Type
Frank Lundberg American Legion American Legion 5605 36th St W Club and Sunday
Applebee's Restaurants North LLC Applebee’s Grill Bar 8332 Highway 7 On-sale Intoxicating and Sunday
Best of India Best of India 8120 Minnetonka Blvd On-sale Wine and 3.2 Malt Liquor
Rackner Inc. Bunny’s 5916 Excelsior Blvd On-sale Intoxicating and Sunday
Byerly’s Inc. Byerly’s St. Louis Park 3777 Park Ctr Blvd On-sale Intoxicating and Sunday
Byerly Beverages, Inc. Byerly’s Wine & Spirits 3785 Park Ctr Blvd Off-sale Intoxicating
ERJ Dining Chili’s Southwest Grill & Bar 5245 Wayzata Blvd On-sale Intoxicating and Sunday
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. Chipotle Mexican Grill 5480 Excelsior Blvd On-sale Wine and 3.2 Malt Liquor
The Cooper LLC Cooper Irish Pub 1607 Park Place Blvd On-sale Intoxicating and Sunday
Costco Wholesale Corp. Costco Wholesale #377 5801 W 16th St Off-sale Intoxicating
Crave Hospitality WE LLC Crave 1603 West End Blvd On-sale Intoxicating and Sunday
Diamond Lake 1994 LLC Cub Foods Knollwood 3620 Texas Ave S Off-sale 3.2 Malt Liquor
W2005 WYN Hotels Doubletree Park Place Hotel 1500 Park Place Blvd On-sale Intoxicating and Sunday
Grand City Buffet, Inc. Grand City Buffet 8912 Highway 7 On-sale Wine and 3.2 Malt Liquor
Granite City Restaurant
Operations, Inc.
Granite City Food and Brewery 5500 Excelsior Blvd On-sale Intoxicating and Sunday,
Brewpub off-sale
HSSLP, LLC Homewood Suite St. Louis Park 5305 Wayzata Blvd On-sale 3.2 Malt Liquor
Jennings Red Coach Inn Inc. Jennings' Liquor Store 4631 Excelsior Blvd Off-sale Intoxicating
Knollwood Liquor Inc. Knollwood Liquor 7924 State Hwy 7 Off-sale Intoxicating
MM Liquor Barrel, Inc Liquor Barrel, Inc. 5111 Excelsior Blvd Off-sale Intoxicating
CSM Lodging Services, Inc. Marriott Mpls West 9970 Wayzata Blvd On-sale Intoxicating and Sunday
McCoy's of Minneapolis, Inc. McCoy's Public House 3801 Grand Way On-sale Intoxicating and Sunday
Minneapolis Golf Club Minneapolis Golf Club 2001 Flag Ave S Club and Sunday
The Noodles Shop, Co – Colorado Inc. Noodles & Company 5326 16th Street West On-sale Wine and 3.2 Malt Liquor
GMRI Inc. Olive Garden #1424 5235 Wayzata Blvd On-sale Intoxicating and Sunday
Philips Investment Co. Park Tavern Lounge & Lanes 3401 Louisiana Ave S On-sale Intoxicating and Sunday
Pei Wei Asian Diner Inc Pei Wei Asian Diner 5330 Cedar Lake Rd On-sale Wine and 3.2 Malt Liquor
RBF, LLC of Wisconsin Rainbow Foods #8803, #8903 5370 16th Street West Off-sale Intoxicating and 3.2 Malt Liquor
Rojo West End LLC Rojo Mexican Grill 1602 West End Blvd On-sale Intoxicating and Sunday
Sam’s West Inc. Sam’s Club #6318 3745 Louisiana Ave S Off-sale Intoxicating and 3.2 Malt Liquor
Kerasotes Showplace Theatres, LLC Showplace 14 #8863 1625 West End Blvd On-sale Intoxicating and Sunday
Nguyen, Lua T.K. St. Louis Park Liquors 6316 Minnetonka Blvd Off-sale Intoxicating
Target Corporation Target Store T-2189 8900 Highway 7 Off-sale 3.2 Malt Liquor
Taste of India/St. Louis Park Inc. Taste of India 5617 Wayzata Blvd On-sale Wine and 3.2 Malt Liquor
Texas-Tonka Liquors Inc. Texas-Tonka Liquors 8242 Minnetonka Blvd Off-sale Intoxicating
H.J.K.S. Inc. Texa-Tonka Lanes 8200 Minnetonka Blvd On-sale Intoxicating and Sunday
TGI Friday’s of MN Inc. TGI Friday’s 5875 Wayzata Blvd On-sale Intoxicating and Sunday
Thanh Do Inc. Thanh Do 8028 Minnetonka Blvd On-sale Wine and 3.2 Malt Liquor
The Four Firkins-Lagers Ales &
Wines LLC
The Four Firkins–Lagers Ales &
Wines
8009 Minnetonka Blvd Off-sale Intoxicating
Trader Joe’s Trader Joe’s 4500 Excelsior Blvd Off-sale Intoxicating
Vescio's of St. Louis Park, Inc. Vescio's Cucina 4001 State Hwy 7 On-sale Wine and 3.2 Malt Liquor
Vintage Wine & Spiritz Vintage Wine & Spiritz 8942 Highway 7 Off-sale Intoxicating
FC Liquors 2 Inc. Westwood Liquors 2304 Louisiana Ave S Off-sale Intoxicating
A Wok in the Park LLC Wok in the Park 3005 Utah Ave South On-sale Wine and 3.2 Malt Liquor
Yangtze Inc. Yangtze River Restaurant 5625 Wayzata Blvd On-sale Intoxicating and Sunday
Yum!, Inc. Yum, Inc. 4000 Minnetonka Blvd On-sale Wine and 3.2 Malt Liquor
Meeting Date: February 7, 2011
Agenda Item #: 4b
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Acceptance of Gift from Microsoft for Home Use and E-Learning Programs.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to Adopt Resolution approving acceptance of donation from Microsoft for Home Use
and E-Learning Programs.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Does the City Council wish to accept the donation from Microsoft?
BACKGROUND:
Minnesota Statutes Section 465.03 requires that donations of real or personal property to the city
be accepted by a resolution of the City Council adopted by a two-thirds majority of its members.
As reported to Council at its January 24 study session, the City of St. Louis Park currently pays
annual license fees to Microsoft for the use of its software. In general, the City pays for the
software’s use on up to 335 computers. This licensing is provided through what is called, by
Microsoft, its Software Assurance Enterprise Agreement. As part of the Agreement, the City has
the option to engage in certain benefits at no additional out-of-pocket costs to the City.
The first is the Microsoft Home Use Program. The Home Use Program is a benefit of Software
Assurance, one of Microsoft’s volume licensing programs. It provides a way for employers to
enable employees to use at home some of the same Microsoft products they use at work. The
cost to the employee to download this software (i.e., Microsoft Office 2010 at this time) is $9.95
plus tax. It is optional and not required. Employees are able to acquire all components of
Microsoft Office licensed by the City, whether or not they are currently utilized by the City or a
particular work group.
The second program is the Microsoft E-Learning Program. It allows staff to complete training
on-line wherever they have web access. This training would cover Windows 7 and Microsoft
Office 2010 components licensed to the City. Other potential benefits include:
Helping employees become more productive with Microsoft software
Preparing employees for new product implementations
Getting flexible self-paced training options without impacting your budget
Insofar as the City is planning to migrate to Windows 7 and Office 2010 beginning later in 2011,
staff feels both of these Microsoft benefits hold potential value. First, employees who need it can
have anytime access to software they use at work and training to support its use. Second, the City
can save thousands of dollars in classroom training fees through the use of e-learning. For
example, during the last Microsoft software migration in 2003, approximately $100,000 was
expended on classroom training. Finally, the employee is able to make legal home use of
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 4b) Page 2
Subject: Acceptance of Gift from Microsoft for Home Use and E-Learning Programs
Microsoft Office 2010 at a discounted price of $9.95 plus tax. That compares to at least $100 for
the equivalent software on the open market and can be viewed as an employee benefit.
Although the City may be the conduit for these benefits, it also needs to be clear that the City
cannot allocate its small IT staff to provide support to home use. In general, this should not be an
issue given Microsoft’s ease of use. The City will not help with the setup or support of an
employee’s home use – that it is the responsibility of the employee. When and if an employee
uses the E-Learning program, it is expected to be used on City time and usually in lieu of
attending classes.
Another concern that can be raised by such programs is the potential liability of the City of St.
Louis Park when employees are using facilities at home that have any remote relationship to the
City. The City does not currently have any telecommuting programs in place, and employees are
thus not required to work at home. Some employees do choose on their own to work at home,
including through their use of voicemail and email. While there is always the potential for
liability with any city activity, the city attorney does not see any unusual risk involved with these
programs. In accordance with the personnel policy and contracts, any change in work schedule,
flexible hours, overtime and comp time if allowed must be pre-approved by the Department
Head. Department Heads are required to inform the City Manager on schedules, changes and
obtain prior approval as needed.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
The City currently pays Microsoft annual license fees to support 335 computers. If ultimately
approved, the programs described above would be available to up to 335 simultaneous
employees, including Council members.
There are no additional out-of pocket costs to the City to participate in the programs described
above. That said, there are administrative costs of time to administer and maintain the programs.
However, staff feels these costs are worth the value of enabling employees to utilize software
and training from home or the office that supports their use of the standard Microsoft Office
tools they utilize at work.
The City Attorney has reviewed these programs from the standpoint of compliance with state law
prohibiting gifts to public officials. Because there is general public benefit to the city and
because such programs are available to any organization (public, private, or non-profit) with a
comparable Microsoft licensing agreement, he is comfortable that the City can accept by
resolution the programs as a gift to the city.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
None.
Attachments: Resolution
Prepared by: Clint Pires, Chief Information Officer
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 4b) Page 3
Subject: Acceptance of Gift from Microsoft for Home Use and E-Learning Programs
RESOLUTION NO. 11-____
RESOLUTION APPROVING ACCEPTANCE OF DONATION
FROM MICROSOFT FOR HOME USE AND E-LEARNING PROGRAMS
WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park is required by Minnesota Statutes Section 465.03
to authorize acceptance of any donations; and
WHEREAS, the City Council must also ratify any restrictions placed on the donation by
the donor; and
WHEREAS, Microsoft offers Home Use and E-Learning programs through its Software
Assurance Enterprise Agreement, to which the City of St. Louis Park is a party;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of St. Louis
Park that the donation is hereby accepted with thanks to Microsoft and with the understanding
that the programs shall be administered by the Chief Information Officer or designee and used
within the restrictions articulated by related Microsoft agreements. It is also understood that this
is a voluntary option for employees of the City of St. Louis Park and it is not extended as a
requirement for work at home and it is for voluntary learning and use by the employee. The
City Manager is authorized to administer this program in accordance with personnel polices,
contracts and regulations. The City will not help with the setup or support of an employee’s
home use – that it is the responsibility solely of the employee.
Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council February 7, 2011
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Meeting Date: February 7, 2011
City Council Agenda Item #: 4c
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Traffic Study Number 623: Authorize the Installation of a 4-Way Stop at the Intersection of
Yosemite Avenue & West 42nd Street.
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
Motion to adopt a resolution rescinding prior 2-way traffic controls and authorizing new 4-way
traffic controls at Yosemite Avenue & West 42nd Street.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Does the City Council wish to authorize the installation of the stop signs as noted in this staff
report?
The proposed action is consistent with City policy.
BACKGROUND:
City staff has been working with residents in the area of Yosemite Avenue, south of Excelsior
Boulevard, for several months regarding resident concerns about the level of traffic and
congestion on Yosemite Avenue. As a part of this process, some residents requested a 4-way
stop condition be installed at the intersection of Yosemite Avenue and W. 42nd Street. Currently,
the intersection has a 2-way stop condition in the north-south direction. Staff reviewed this
intersection and found that it did not meet the traffic criteria set forth in the City’s Traffic
Control Policy for the installation of a 4-way stop condition. However, under the policy a
resident can go through the petition process even if the desired controls are not warranted. This
requires that 70% of residents within a 600 foot radius of the intersection sign a petition
requesting controls.
In September of 2010, a petition form was requested and sent to a resident. The completed
petition was submitted to City staff at a neighborhood meeting on November 18, 2010. There
were 97 signatures in favor of the 4-way stop out of 121 households listed in the designated area.
This is above the 70% minimum required by the City’s Traffic Control Policy.
Although these stop signs are not warranted per the traffic criteria set forth in the City’s policy,
the petition requirements of the City’s policy have been met and, therefore, staff is
recommending Council authorize installation of the signs as requested.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
The cost of enacting these controls is minimal and will come out of the general operating budget.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
None.
Attachments: Resolution
Proposed Stop Sign Location Map
Prepared by: Laura Adler, Engineering Program Coordinator
Reviewed by: Scott A. Brink, City Engineer
Michael P. Rardin, Director of Public Works
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 4c) Page 2
Subject: TS 623 – 4-way stop Yosemite and 42nd St.
RESOLUTION NO. 11-_____
RESOLUTION RESCINGING RESOLUTION NO. 3200 AND
AUTHORIZING INSTALLATIONOF 4-WAY STOP SIGNS
AT YOSEMITE AVENUE SOUTH AND W. 42ND STREET
TRAFFIC STUDY NO. 623
WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota has been requested, has studied, and
has determined that the following traffic controls meet the requirements of the City’s policy for
installation of Stop signs.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis
Park, Minnesota, that Resolution No. 3200 be rescinded.
LET IT BE FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park,
Minnesota, that:
1. The Director of Public Works is hereby authorized to install 4-way stop signs at the
intersection of Yosemite Avenue South and W. 42nd Street.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council February 7, 2011
City Manager
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 4c)
Subject: TS 623 – 4-way stop Yosemite and 42nd St.Page 3
Meeting Date: February 7, 2011
City Council Agenda Item #: 4d
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Traffic Study Number 624: Authorize the Installation of Turning Restrictions on Yosemite
Avenue at Excelsior Boulevard.
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
Motion to adopt a resolution authorizing “No Left Turns 7-9 a.m. and 4-6 p.m.” on Yosemite
Avenue, south of Excelsior Boulevard.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Does the City Council wish to authorize the installation of the traffic signs as noted in this staff
report?
The proposed action is consistent with City policy.
BACKGROUND:
City staff have been working with residents in the area of Yosemite Avenue, south of Excelsior
Boulevard for several months regarding resident concerns about the level of traffic and
congestion on Yosemite Avenue. As a part of this process, some residents requested turn
restrictions be installed at the intersection of Yosemite Avenue and Excelsior Boulevard that
would restrict left turns from northbound Yosemite Avenue to westbound Excelsior Boulevard
during rush hour. Residents report that Yosemite Avenue gets congested during rush hour due to
vehicles waiting to make left turns onto Excelsior Boulevard. The narrow width of Yosemite
Avenue does not allow vehicles to pass waiting vehicles, thus creating congestion issues and
safety concerns at the intersection. The issue was reviewed twice with residents at neighborhood
meetings conducted on August 31 and November 18, 2010, and also with Hennepin County.
Staff reviewed this request, and believes that it will help decrease congestion. Therefore, staff is
recommending Council authorize installation of these signs as requested.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
The cost of enacting these controls is minimal and will come out of the general operating budget.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
None.
Attachments: Resolution
Prepared by: Laura Adler, Engineering Program Coordinator
Reviewed by: Scott A. Brink, City Engineer
Michael P. Rardin, Director of Public Works
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 4d) Page 2
Subject: TS 624 - Authorize Installation of Turn Restrictions Yosemite Ave at Excelsior Blvd
RESOLUTION NO. 11-____
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING INSTALLATION OF
“NO LEFT TURN 7-9 A.M. AND 4-6 P.M.” SIGNS ON
YOSEMITE AVENUE, SOUTH OF EXCELSIOR BOULEVARD
TRAFFIC STUDY NO. 624
WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota has been requested, has studied, and
has determined that the following traffic controls meet the requirements of the City’s policy for
installation of Stop signs.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis
Park, Minnesota, that:
1. The Director of Public Works is hereby authorized to install “No Left Turn 7-9 a.m. and
4-6 p.m.” signs restricting turning movements from northbound Yosemite Avenue to
westbound Excelsior Boulevard.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council February 7, 2011
City Manager
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Meeting Date: February 7, 2011
City Council Agenda Item #: 4e
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Traffic Study Number 625: Authorize the Installation of a 4-Way Stop Condition at W. 16th
Street West and Duke Drive.
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
Motion to adopt a resolution authorizing the installation of a 4-way stop condition at W. 16th
Street West and Duke Drive.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Does the City Council wish to authorize the installation of the stop signs as noted in this staff
report?
The proposed action is consistent with City policy.
BACKGROUND:
City staff have been working the management of The West End development on some ongoing
traffic concerns. The main concern has been the intersection of Duke Drive, which is a private
street, with W. 16th Street. Currently, Duke Drive has stop signs and W. 16th Street does not.
Vehicles sometimes have trouble turning from Duke Drive onto W. 16th Street, citing lack of
traffic gaps and poor visibility as reasons. Added safety concerns with growing pedestrian usage
at this location were also expressed. Staff subsequently worked with the West End Management
on improving visibility and sightlines at the intersection, including trimming vegetation in the
median. However, problems and complaints continued to persist. As a result, City staff
contracted with SRF to do a traffic study to look at the impacts of placing a 4-way stop at this
intersection, now and in the future when the office towers (Phase II Development) occurs.
SRF’s study concluded that a 4-way stop would improve the safety and operation of the
intersection now and when the office towers are developed, and recommends the installation of a
4-way stop condition now. Therefore, staff is recommending Council authorize installation of
these signs as recommended.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
The cost of enacting these controls is minimal and will come out of the general operating budget.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
None.
Attachments: Resolution
Proposed Stop Sign Location
Prepared by: Laura Adler, Engineering Program Coordinator
Reviewed by: Scott A. Brink, City Engineer
Michael P. Rardin, Director of Public Works
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 4e) Page 2
Subject: TS 625 - 4-way stop W 16th St. and Duke Drive
RESOLUTION NO. 11-_____
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING INSTALLATION OF
4-WAY STOP SIGNS AT W. 16TH STREET AND DUKE DRIVE
TRAFFIC STUDY NO. 625
WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota has been requested, has studied, and
has determined that the following traffic controls meet the requirements of the City’s policy for
installation of Stop signs.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis
Park, Minnesota, that:
1. The Director of Public Works is hereby authorized to install 4-way stop signs at W. 16th
Street and Duke Drive.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council February 7, 2011
City Manager
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 4e)
Subject: TS 625 - 4-way stop W 16th St. and Duke Drive Page 3
Meeting Date: February 7, 2011
Agenda Item #: 4f
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Final Payment Resolution - Contract 52-10 Valley Paving, Inc. – Project No. 2009-1000.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to Adopt Resolution authorizing final payment in the amount of $97,990.80 and
accepting work for the 2010 Local Street Rehabilitation - Pavement Management Area 6 Repair
with Valley Paving, Inc. Project No. 2009-1000, City Contract No. 52-10.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
BACKGROUND:
Bids were received on April 8, 2010 for the Pavement Management Project – Area 6. This is the
sixth year of the City’s Pavement Management Program. Work for this year’s program occurred
on selected streets in the Elmwood, Brookside, Brooklawns, Creekside and Meadowbrook
Neighborhoods. The work included replacing the old pavement with a new asphalt surface.
Other work associated with the project included drainage system repairs and fire hydrant
replacement.
City Council awarded the project to Valley Paving, Inc. on April 19, 2010 in the amount of
$1,005,620.31. The Contractor completed this work within the contract time allowed at a final
contract cost of $1,012,804.71 including the following change orders: Change Order No. 1
amounted to $19,141.25 for extra utility work, Change Order No. 2 (no cost) was for a 10
working day extension, and Change Order No. 3 amounted to $13,249.05 to disconnect utility
service lines for three houses on Goodrich Avenue scheduled for demolition as part of the
reconstruction of Fire Station No. 1. There was also a project item underruns amounting to
$25,205.90.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
The cost for this project was accounted for in the 2010 capital budget. This project will be
funded by two sources, the Pavement Management Fund for the associated street work and the
Water Utility Fund for the hydrant replacements.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
Attachments: Resolution
Prepared by: Jim Olson, Engineering Project Manager
Reviewed by: Mike Rardin, Public Works Director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 4f) Page 2
Subject: Final Payment Resolution - Contract 52-10 Valley Paving – Project 2009-1000
RESOLUTION NO. 11-____
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING FINAL PAYMENT IN THE
AMOUNT OF $97,990.80 AND ACCEPTING THE WORK FOR THE
2010 LOCAL STREET REHABILITATION PROJECT
WITH VALLEY PAVING, INC.
CITY PROJECT NO. 2009-1000
CONTRACT NO. 52-10
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of St. Louis
Park, Minnesota, as follows:
1. Pursuant to a written contract with the City dated April 19, 2010, Valley Paving, Inc. has
satisfactorily completed the 2010 Local Street Rehabilitation Project, as per Contract No. 52-10.
2. The Director of Public Works has filed his recommendations for final acceptance of the work.
3. The work completed under this contract is accepted and approved. The City Manager is directed
to make final payment on the contract, taking the contractor's receipt in full.
Original Contract Price $ 1,005,620.31
Change Order 1 $ 19,141.25
Change Order 2 .00
Change Order 3 $ 13,249.05
Underrun $ (25,205.90)
Contract Amount $1,012,804.71
Previous Payments $ 914,813.91
Balance Due $ 97,990.80
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council February 7, 2011
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Meeting Date: February 7, 2011
Agenda Item #: 4g
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Final Payment Resolution - Contract 128-10 PCI Roads, LLC – Project No. 2008-1100.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to Adopt Resolution authorizing final payment in the amount of $14,674.70 for the 2010
MSA Street Improvement Project - Texas Avenue with PCI Roads, LLC, Project No. 2008-1100
- City Contract No. 128-10.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Does the Council wish to approve the final payment?
BACKGROUND:
City Council approved undertaking the 2010 MSA Street Improvement Project, Project No.
2008-1100. The project was advertised, bid and awarded to PCI Roads, LLC on August 8, 2010
in the amount of $183,840.10. This project included concrete pavement rehabilitation work on
Texas Avenue from Minnetonka Blvd to W. 28th Street.
The Contractor completed this work within the contract time allowed (25 days) at a final contract
cost of $221,954.15 with $38,114.05 in overruns. The cost overrun is attributed to
underestimation of quantities by staff in the payment items for the concrete joint repair. It is
sometimes difficult to determine the extent of the concrete repairs needed until removal of the
old concrete pavement occurs. Once removal of the old concrete occurred, staff determined it
was necessary to perform more extensive concrete repairs than originally planned in order to
properly rehabilitate this pavement.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
The cost for this project was accounted for in the 2010 capital budget. The project is funded by
State Aid funds raised through the gas tax.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
Attachments: Resolution
Prepared by: Jim Olson, Engineering Project Manager
Reviewed by: Scott Brink, City Engineer
Mike Rardin, Public Works Director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 4g) Page 2
Subject: Final Payment Resolution - Contract 128-10 PCI Roads – Project No. 2008-1100
RESOLUTION NO. 11-____
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING FINAL PAYMENT
IN THE AMOUNT OF $14,674.70 FOR THE
2010 MSA STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
WITH PCI ROADS, LLC
CITY PROJECT NO. 2008-1100
CONTRACT NO. 128-10
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, as
follows:
1. Pursuant to a written contract with the City dated August 8, 2010, PCI Roads, LLC has
satisfactorily completed the 2010 MSA Improvement Project, as per Contract No. 128-
10.
2. The Director of Public Works has filed his recommendations for final acceptance of the
work.
3. The work completed under this contract is accepted and approved. The City Manager is
directed to make final payment on the contract, taking the contractor's receipt in full.
Original Contract Amount $ 183,840.10
Overruns $ 38,114.05
Final Contract Amount $ 221,954.15
Previous Payments $ 207,279.45
Balance Due $ 14,674.70
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council February 7, 2011
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Meeting Date: February 7, 2011
Agenda Item #: 4h
OFFICIAL MINUTES
Parks and Recreation Advisory
Commission Meeting
December 1, 2010
7 p.m. – Meeting
1. Call to Order
George Hagemann, Chair, called the meeting to order at 7 p.m.
Commission members present: Christina Barberot, Sam Flumerfelt, George Foulkes, George
Hagemann, Steve Hallfin, Kirk Hawkinson and Tom Worthington
Commission members absent: None.
Staff present: Director of Parks and Recreation, Cindy Walsh, Environmental Coordinator, Jim
Vaughan, and Administrative Secretary, Stacy Voelker.
2. Presentation: None.
3. Approval of Minutes
a. October 20, 2010
Commission member Hagemann requested the following changes be made:
Item 2, third paragraph: “Mr. Hagemann Hawkinson inquired how other cities
baseball associations are organized…”
Item 6d, first paragraph: The moss is used to cool the Freon products filter
condensation which is used in air conditioners and condensers in ice arenas.
It was moved by Councilmember Barberot seconded by Councilmember Hallfin to
approve the Minutes as amended. Motion passed 7 – 0.
4. New Business
a. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Creek Meandering Project (MCWD)
Ms. Walsh introduced James Wisker, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD)
Planner. Mr. Wisker provided a brief history of the MCWD as it is a regional unit of
government which sits between the county and the state, with some regulatory duties,
designed to work with state and local communities. The MCWD was originally created in
the 1970’s to monitor and assist in flooding issues with Minnehaha Creek. Mr. Wisker
advised the MCWD began by installing a dam at Grays Bay on Lake Minnetonka. The
MCWD covers approximately 181 square miles. The MCWD is now involved in water
quality, land use planning, habit planning, and the affects landscaping had on water
quality. They have a comprehensive plan to guide protection of current water bodies and
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 4h) Page 2
Subject: Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Minutes December 1, 2010
oversee a variety of projects to achieve their goals. Their regulatory branch enforces rules
that protect water resources from development and construction activities. This includes
how run off water is managed, wetland rules, and storm water rules. The Water Quality
Monitoring Program is responsible for sampling approximately 120 lakes and the Creek.
The MCWD also provides education, land conservation, and planning programs plus a
project management team to oversee projects. Included in the goal of educating the public is
to expose individuals to why the work is done (i.e. for water quality, passive recreation, etc.).
Mr. Worthington inquired how many years Mr. Wisker’s has been with the MCWD to
which Mr. Wisker indicated he began as an intern five and a half years ago.
How do recreational uses fit into what MCWD does, questioned Mr. Hagemann. There
are mandates around beneficial uses or recreational uses, Mr. Wisker replied, with water
quality as their main focus. Seventeen goals comprise their plan with recreation as one of
those goals. The main goal in Lake Minnetonka is to keep channels open for recreation.
Mr. Wisker indicated a lot of land acquired is for passive recreation (i.e. walking trails).
The MCWD works to integrate recreation and the City’s comprehensive plans into their
annual goals.
Mr. Hallfin inquired if there is another creek watershed within the city. Mr. Vaughan
advised Bassett Creek is located in northern St. Louis Park. “Do watersheds work
together?” inquired Mr. Hallfin. Each Creek has their own jurisdiction on a map, advised
Mr. Wisker, but they do coordinate projects.
Mr. Hallfin recalled the Minnehaha Creek was polluted in Hopkins and inquired how
MCWD handled the situation. Mr. Wisker showed the Commission a map of the sewage
pump station around Lake Street and indicated a backhoe had cut through a pipe under
Minnehaha Creek which dumped sewage into the Creek. The Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency (MPCA) is in control of enforcement and fining. MCWD assists in
immediate action to control the situation. It is now required to have dual force main for
underground sewage pipes to protect issues, advised Mr. Wisker. Mr. Hallfin inquired
what duties were performed when incident happened. Mr. Wisker advised the first thing
that happened was everything was shut off then attempted to clean up any visible items;
everything else remained in the creek. If this incident happened in the City’s storm water,
Mr. Vaughan replied, the City would attempt to follow it and clean up. Mr. Wisker
indicated it is organic matter but they have an interest to see what happens to it. Although
it is unlikely to cause concern, it still may be a human health issue.
Mr. Wisker distributed a map showing the proposed remeander of Minnehaha Creek and
reviewed the previous Methodist Hospital boardwalk project. Mr. Wisker proceeded to
explain the background behind the proposed creek meandering. The MCWD reviewed a
request from Methodist Hospital for rain gardens on their property. Mr. Wisker explained
how the creek was moved/straightened in the past due to construction and how
meandering is beneficial for the health of the stream. The MCWD suggested meandering
of the stream which would assist in the healing benefits Methodist seeks. They wish to
connect the benefits of nature healing with their patients; get patients outside to promote
recreational healing aspects. Mr. Wisker distributed a map showing pictures of before
and after creek meandering around Methodist Hospital and also explained other benefits
of meandering versus straight. Following completion of that project, the MCWD felt it
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 4h) Page 3
Subject: Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Minutes December 1, 2010
would be beneficial to enhance the creek through Hopkins and St. Louis Park. Mr.
Wisker indicated the Watershed District is lucky to coordinate with St. Louis Park and
the developer to acquire pieces of land around creek. They also propose to reconnect the
channel with the old channel and old flood plain.
Ms Walsh explained that years ago there was a development proposal in that area and the
City desired to preserve it as open space. The MCWD will begin the planning process. If
their board approves this project, the MCWD will meet with the City to discuss what’s
best for the area which may include moving the channel, adding trails, and potentially
pull concrete pipes back and put into treatment ponds to remove pollutants. The goal is to
improve water quality, improve habitat, improve recreation, and have connectivity
(boardwalk from Methodist to light rail). The MCWD will work with the City of
Hopkins, along Blake Road, to create a regional park with open creek frontage to allow
residents to enjoy the creek.
Members expressed their excitement for the project. Mr. Worthington asked who
provided the engineering work for the Methodist project which Mr. Wisker indicated was
Inter-Fluve, Inc. Part of the process, Mr. Wisker indicated, is to meet with the City and
stakeholders which would include community meetings to discuss proposals and obtain
feedback. Commission members offered their assistance on the project.
Mr. Worthington indicated it would be beneficial to monitor the current water quality and
compare it to the future quality. MCWD has past and present data on the water, explained
Mr. Wisker, although it is complicated as the values vary upstream and downstream. Mr.
Wisker explained that oxbow lakes are created in the corners from the water flow. Those
areas could be wildlife ponds or holding ponds.
Mr. Hagemann inquired on the funding for the Methodist Hospital project to which Mr.
Wisker replied Park Nicollet paid almost 100% for the design; they contributed to the
construction; and provided 100% funding for the boardwalk. MCWD contributed to the
construction. Mr. Hagemann inquired on funding for the proposed project. Mr. Wisker
indicated the City, with help from the district, applied for state grant legacy money to
cover costs.
Ms. Barberot inquired on the project timeline which Mr. Wisker indicated was
aggressive. MCWD would like to initiate the preliminary design next week and the board
will have a public hearing in April or May to see if project is formally ordered. If
approved, the design will be completed in phases, with City of St. Louis Park staff
involved, as well as public stakeholder meetings done prior to final design. Mr. Wisker
indicated it’s easier to build in the winter when grounds are firm.
Ms. Barberot suggested holding annual clean up in the area under discussion to showcase
that area of the proposed project. Commission members and Mr. Wisker agreed. The
quality and lake grade of Meadowbrook Lake was questioned by Ms. Barberot.
Meadowbrook is not an actual lake, advised Mr. Wisker, but is part of the City of
Minneapolis with the MCWD holding the data. The MCWD adjusts the channels and
how they work to create more habitats in the creek, advised Mr. Wisker, which is known
as a stabilization project.
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 4h) Page 4
Subject: Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Minutes December 1, 2010
Members appreciate the update and project is supported; Mr. Wisker was thanked.
b. City Forestry and Environment Initiatives (Jim Vaughan)
Mr. Vaughan reviewed the storm water drainage area diagram with the Commission and
informed the member’s storm water drainage concentrates on flood prevention, not
specifically water quality. Initially the idea was to collect water and get if off the site as
soon as possible to avoid flooding houses. The current Storm Water Act (Federal, State,
and City) mandates review and concern for water quality also as water quality issues are
increasing. The different water quality variables include dog feces, grass clippings, leaves
being raked into streets, etc. Mr. Vaughan is amazed at how well the complicated system
works. He indicated in the past, most of the parks were wetlands and had to be filled in to
create parks. Barr Engineering has tested 12 public ponds and lakes for sediment, water
quality and functionality then prioritized areas for Capital Plan which will be overseen by
Public Works. Barr will do testing on more public ponds/lakes in 2011.
The MCWD will be working on Twin Lakes Park, Mr. Vaughan advised. In mid 1990’s
the city partnered with other organizations (Clean Water Partnership) to clean up the
chain of lakes and Twin Lakes is part of that project. MCWD will be the lead with Mr.
Vaughan as the city liaison. After the lakes/ponds report is received from Barr
Engineering, the city will determine what other ponds/lakes may need attention.
Mr. Worthington commented on the nice exhibit at the Landscape Arboretum showing
five examples of parking lot treatments.
Commissioners reviewed a flyer Mr. Vaughan distributes to residents when noticing
residents mow improperly. The flyer emphasizes the negative affects that grass clippings
have on storm water and water quality.
Environmental highlights from 2010, distributed by Mr. Vaughan, were reviewed with
members. Highlights included the Zero Waste event at the Nature Center in conjunction
with Arbor/Earth Day. The zero waste event philosophy will be incorporated at the June
Community Open house to be held at the MSC and will work with Parktacular to
encourage their event to be zero waste. Other highlights include the annual Eco Fair
(fishing and an aquarium with fish from the lake), and weed enforcement. Mr. Foulkes
inquired on the weed enforcement process for vacant land to which Mr. Vaughan advised
fees are assessed and a lien is put on the property.
The Dutch Elm Disease statistics were reviewed by Mr. Vaughan which were lower in
2010. Adequate moisture and fewer elms is the reason for lower numbers. Mr. Vaughan
reviewed the Council elm tree injection program and indicated funding came from land
sale proceeds and that Council supported 15% subsidy in 2010. Members discussed the
benefits of the injection program.
Many trees were planted this year, according to Mr. Vaughan, due to loss of Elms and
other tree species, such as Maples, Ash and Oaks. The city partnered with Tree Trust on a
tree sale and which subsidized tree costs through the urban reforestation program. The
tree sale offered approximately five different species for purchase as an incentive for
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 4h) Page 5
Subject: Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Minutes December 1, 2010
residents to purchase and plant trees to replace ones that have been removed. Ms.
Barberot suggested offering tree planting service for those that purchase trees. This
service was offered last year, advised Mr. Vaughan, but was not utilized. In 2009,
approximately five people utilized the planting service. Ms. Barberot suggested
increasing marketing on the planting service. Boulevard and park trees were planted in
spring and fall, Mr. Vaughan indicated. Most of trees planted were part of the EAB grant
received; a part of the grant was dedicated to tree planting.
The city’s website includes a boulevard tree pruning map which shows the areas that will
be pruned each year and where pruning will begin in a few weeks. Mr. Vaughan
reviewed the pruning area with members and explained a contractor is hired for the work
and $60,000 is budgeted and spent every year.
Boulevard ash trees were inventoried last year, Mr. Vaughan explained, as ash was the
replacement for the elm trees lost. Even though ash trees are smaller trees than elms, they
will still have an impact when removed due to EAB. Emerald Ash Borer (EAB) is
attracted to stressed trees so staff worked to remove stressed trees from the city. Letters
were sent to residents explaining why approximately 150 ash trees were marked and
removed plus approximately 50 trees in parks will be removed to avoid EAB. The
existing stumps will be removed in spring and all trees will be replaced in spring by
another type of tree. The goal, Mr. Vaughan explained, is to plant no more than 10% of
one species which would diversity the tree population. Mr. Vaughan reviewed what EAB
looks like and passed out pictures showing other insects compared to EAB. Ash trees
removed are brought to St. Paul for disposal by District Energy. Mr. Vaughan distributed
an EAB flyer provided to residents which is part of the EAB communication plan.
Mr. Vaughan advised of the four evergreen award winners which included one business
and three residents. Members were invited to contact Mr. Vaughan if interested in being
on evergreen award committee. The city has five community gardens which are very
successful, advised Mr. Vaughan. The City manages the gardens at Hurd Park (Cedar
Lake Road and Quebec) and at Texa-Tonka. Both gardens charge $25 per lot and have
waiting lists. A water source has been added to Hurd Park garden from the Capital
Improvement Plan in 2009. A potential benefit of the gardens is of the excess food the
community gardens produce to be given to STEP. The Birchwood Neighborhood. has a
community garden at the Church of Reformation, the Bronx Park Neighborhood has a
garden in Nelson Park and the Sorenson Neighborhood has a small area in Webster Park.
Mr. Hagemann inquired on the damage from the last storm to which Mr. Vaughan
indicated many branches were lost from ash and silver maple trees. Mr. Vaughan advised
staff will begin park clean up after the sidewalks and roads are clear.
Mr. Vaughan advised the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) assesses Louisiana
Oaks area (former Reilly Tar site) every five years to evaluate potential health hazards.
This year they performed the evaluation and requested, in the southwest corner of the
park, the city adds one foot of fill. The Utility and Street Departments will add top soil
and seed (called capping) this winter.
Members thanked Mr. Vaughan for his time and programs.
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 4h) Page 6
Subject: Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Minutes December 1, 2010
c. Elect Officials for 2011
Mr. Hagemann inquired of any nominations. Mr. Hawkinson nominated Ms. Barberot as
Chair; Mr. Foulkes seconded. Motion passed 7 - 0.
Mr. Hagemann inquired of vice chair nominees. Mr. Foulkes nominated Mr.
Worthington; Mr. Hallfin seconded. Motion passed 7 – 0.
5. Old Business
a. Community Recreation Planning Process Update
Ms. Walsh provided Commissioners with an update on the Community Recreation
Planning Process and advised Schoenbauer Consulting LLC has been hired. Kathy
Schoenbauer, proprietor, has successfully completed similar types of surveys for the
DNR and City of Minneapolis. Staff will work with Council on Monday to develop
survey questions. Ms. Walsh asked members to encourage residents to respond to the
survey. The survey can be completed via the City’s website or paper copies will be
available at City buildings, the library, Lennox and Jewish Community Center. The
survey will be advertised via media soon and will be sent to neighborhoods and youth
association contacts. The Commission will be updated regularly.
6. Communications
a. Chair
Mr. Hagemann advised the Wooddale and West 36th Street project is complete and open
for traffic. Commissioners were made aware of the new stripped bike way / pavement
markings indicating bicycle use on Wooddale on the bridge. The trail has been
reconfigured and crossing is located at an intersection Mr. Hagemann advised. Cyclists
and rollerblades behaving as pedestrians in crosswalks have the right of way, Mr.
Hagemann indicated. This does not give anyone the right to enter a cross walk when
unsafe to do so though. Signage will be increased and monitored over the winter which
allows time to adjust prior to the busy, summer season.
b. Commissioners
Mr. Foulkes congratulated Ms. Barberot and Mr. Worthington on their nominations. Mr.
Foulkes invited members to a pottery sale at his daughter’s house on Saturday from 3
p.m. to 9 p.m. with all proceeds going to the local food shelf.
Mr. Flumerfelt congratulated Mr. Worthington and Ms. Barberot on their positions on the
Commission.
Ms. Barberot indicated her disappointment regarding the article in the Sun Sailor on the
West End park dedication brought before the Commission in October. Prefers the group
portray a unified approach and majority vote be represented.
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 4h) Page 7
Subject: Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Minutes December 1, 2010
c. Friends of the Arts Update
None.
d. Director Report
None.
7. Adjournment
It was moved by Commissioner Flumerfelt to adjourn at 9:02 p.m. The motion passed 7 - 0.
Respectfully submitted,
Stacy Voelker
Stacy Voelker
Recording Secretary
Meeting Date: February 7, 2011
Agenda Item #: 4i
City of St. Louis Park
Human Rights Commission
Minutes – December 21, 2010
Westwood Room, City Hall
I. Call to Order
Vice Chair Morgan called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
A. Roll Call
Commissioners Present: Bill Gavzy, Alison Knoche Prosser, Stuart Morgan, Jeff
Mueller, Isabella Stewart and Mary Tomback
Staff: Marney Olson, Lt. Lori Dreier and Amy Stegora-Peterson
B. Approval of Agenda
The agenda was approved as presented.
C. Approval of Minutes
It was moved by Commissioner Gavzy, seconded by Commissioner Morgan, to approve
the minutes of October 19, 2010, as presented.
The motion passed 6-0.
II. Commissioner and Committee Reports
A. Individual commissioner and staff reports
Ms. Olson stated Commissioners Lyon, Sivriver and Weier terms had expired and they
were not going to continue on the commission. The City Clerk will accept applications
for the commission vacancies.
Vice Chair Morgan, Commissioner Gavzy and Ms. Olson attended the Human Rights
Day Conference and thought it well organized with many interesting breakout sessions
and topics.
Vice Chair Morgan noted he was rejoining the State Human Rights Commission.
III. Human Rights Award Selection
Ms. Olson indicated she had spoken with all of the nominators and reviewed the
submissions with the Commission.
Commissioners decided to present the award to Inside Look and Sharon and Neil
Anderson. The award will be presented at the January 18, 2011 City Council meeting.
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 4i) Page 2
Subject: Human Rights Commission Minutes December 10, 2010
IV. Domestic Partner Registry
Ms. Olson stated in the beginning of November the City Council began discussing a
voluntary program for domestic partner registration. They asked the HRC to review the
information and make a recommendation. City Council would like to evaluate this in
January. They were not looking for input in the wording of the ordinance.
Commissioner Mueller felt strongly that it was a good idea. There would be no cost to the
City. It is mostly symbolic and might not do a lot, but is an important message to residents.
Commissioner Tomback felt the Commission should support the registry and it would
demonstrate a commitment to equality.
Commissioner Gavzy noted in the past the City Council hadn’t supported symbolic
legislation that didn’t involve the laws of the City. This was more within the powers of
the State government. Most cities have vaguely written ordinances. He would rather
they advocate for a resolution from the City Council urging the State to redefine marriage
to include gay people.
Commissioner Tomback believed the State should hear this, but St. Louis Park residents
should know that the community is welcoming and a registry would have more impact
for residents.
Commissioner Mueller felt it would stand out more if the City Council didn’t approve
this. Edina has a different fee structure for families, which includes families on the
registry on the family structure. That would be beneficial for St. Louis Park residents.
Vice Chair Morgan didn’t have a problem with the registry being symbolic. Anything
they passed to support or increase rights was positive.
Commissioner Gavzy felt they should add to the motion that the City Council also call
for State Legislation to redefine marriage to include gay people.
Commissioners weren’t comfortable including that statement, but commissioners were
okay with asking the Council to consider sending a resolution to the State of Minnesota
regarding this issue.
It was moved by Commissioner Tomback, seconded by Commissioner Mueller to inform
the Council that the HRC supports the City Council pursuing a domestic partner
voluntary registration program and the HRC would also like the Council to consider
sending a resolution to the State of Minnesota regarding this issue.
The motion passed 4-1-1.
Ms. Olson would provide information to the City Council about the Commissions
discussion.
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 4i) Page 3
Subject: Human Rights Commission Minutes December 10, 2010
V. 2011 Chair and Vice Chair Elections
It was moved by Commissioner Gavzy, seconded by Commissioner Tomback, to nominate
Stuart Morgan as Chair. Commissioner Morgan accepted the nomination.
The motion passed 6-0.
It was moved by Commissioner Gavzy, seconded by Commissioner Morgan, to nominate
Mary Tomback as Vice Chair. Commissioner Tomback accepted the nomination.
The motion passed 6-0.
VI. New Business - None
IV. Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 8:13 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Amy L. Stegora-Peterson
Recording Secretary
Meeting Date: February 7, 2011
Agenda Item #: 4j
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Vendor Claims.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to accept for filing Vendor Claims for the period December 30, 2010 through January 28,
2011.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
BACKGROUND:
The Finance Department prepares this report on a monthly basis for Council’s review.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
None.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
Attachments: Vendor Claims
Prepared by: Connie Neubeck, Account Clerk
2/1/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 8:55:47R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
1Page -Council Check Summary
1/28/2011 -12/30/2010
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
736.50WATER UTILITY G&A BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIESA&K EQUIPMENT CO INC
736.50
164.48PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYA-1 OUTDOOR POWER INC
164.48
3,465.94PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYAAA-LICENSE DIVISION
3,465.94
102.50ORGANIZED REC G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CARABERNATHY, LISA
102.50
14.00YOUTH PROGRAMS PROGRAM REVENUEADAMS, JILL
14.00
1,466.83CE MATERIALS TESTING IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDIAECOM INC
1,466.83
3,424.00EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A TUITIONALBRECHT, MARY
3,424.00
770.00OPERATIONSEQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEALEX AIR APPARATUS INC
770.00
245.00CABLE TV G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEALEX AUDIO & VIDEO
245.00
389.85ORGANIZED REC G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESALL STAR SPORTS
50.90HOCKEYGENERAL SUPPLIES
2,965.00HOCKEYOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
3,405.75
861.50H.V.A.C. EQUIP. MTCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICEALLIANCE MECH SRVCS INC
193.50PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1,055.00
153.52CABLE TV G & A MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENTALPHA VIDEO AND AUDIO INC
153.52
2,316.45CONSTRUCTION PAYMENTS IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDIAMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING I
2,316.45
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 4j)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 2
2/1/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 8:55:47R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
2Page -Council Check Summary
1/28/2011 -12/30/2010
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
83.91POLICE G & A TELEPHONEAMERICAN MESSAGING
83.91
375.00ADMINISTRATION G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSAMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC
375.00
160.32GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE OPERATIONAL SUPPLIESAMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SER
275.12PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
134.31PARK MAINTENANCE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
246.08ENTERPRISE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
195.80VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
94.37WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
94.37SEWER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
15.73STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
1,216.10
162,063.36CONSTRUCTION PAYMENTS IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDIAMES CONSTRUCTION
162,063.36
2,459.61SUPPORT SERVICES G&A OFFICE SUPPLIESANCHOR PAPER CO
2,459.61
146.43DAMAGE REPAIR OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESANDERSEN INC, EARL
146.43
25.05HOUSING REHAB BALANCE SHEET CONTRACTS PAYABLEAQUILA NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN
25.05
386.51GENERAL CUSTODIAL DUTIES CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SUPPLYARAMARK UNIFORM CORP ACCTS
672.36ENTERPRISE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
1,058.87
25.00PARK MAINTENANCE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSARBOR DAY FOUNDATION
25.00
309.00ENTERPRISE G & A LICENSESASCAP
309.00
460.83PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYASPEN EQUIPMENT CO
460.83
369.65OPERATIONSOPERATIONAL SUPPLIESASPEN MILLS
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 4j)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 3
2/1/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 8:55:47R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
3Page -Council Check Summary
1/28/2011 -12/30/2010
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
369.65
160.00POLICE G & A TRAININGATOM
900.00PATROLTRAINING
1,060.00
470.96VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICEATOMIC RECYCLING
470.96
485.00PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYAUTO PLUS
485.00
65.79GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEAUTOMOBILE SERVICE
65.79
100.00SUPPORT SERVICES TRAININGAVCAM
100.00
17.50WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERSBAACK, JERRY
17.50
494.00HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESBARNA, GUZY & STEFFEN LTD
494.00
1,918.50STORM WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESBARR ENGINEERING CO
3,785.30STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
5,703.80
2,151.57EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A TUITIONBARRETT, TIM
2,151.57
117.57PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURESBARTLEY SALES CO
117.57
16,541.00STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESBASSETT CREEK WATER MGMT
16,541.00
22.04GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIESBATTERIES PLUS
22.04
876.38BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIESBECKER ARENA PRODUCTS
876.38
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 4j)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 4
2/1/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 8:55:47R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
4Page -Council Check Summary
1/28/2011 -12/30/2010
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
362.50GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESBEDNAR, DAN
362.50
1,400.00GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A RENTAL BUILDINGSBELT LINE PROPERTIES INC
1,400.00
49.50ORGANIZED REC G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CARBIRNO, RICK
49.50
309.00ORGANIZED REC G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESBMI GENERAL LICENSING
309.00
71.00ENGINEERING G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESBOLTON & MENK INC
71.00
1,754.47OPERATIONSOPERATIONAL SUPPLIESBOUND TREE MEDICAL, LLC
1,754.47
219.99GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEBOYER FORD TRUCKS
219.99
2,940.00GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURESBRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION
2,940.00
1,850.40EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A TUITIONBRETZA, KIMBERLY
1,850.40
300.00SOFTBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESBRIGGS, AMY
300.00
28.42WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERSBROWN, EARL
28.42
700.00HUMAN RESOURCES ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENTBRYNTESON, DR RICHARD
700.00
16.03POLICE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIESBUDGET SIGN & GRAPHICS
16.03
17.00ASSESSING G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTATBULTEMA, CORY
138.00ASSESSING G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 4j)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 5
2/1/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 8:55:47R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
5Page -Council Check Summary
1/28/2011 -12/30/2010
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
155.00
1,413.00WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERSBUNTE, KELLY
1,413.00
140.00GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEC&E AUTO UPHOLSTERY
140.00
280.00TV PRODUCTION REPAIRSCADCO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
280.00
9,888.50ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL SERVICESCAMPBELL KNUTSON PROF ASSOC
750.00WATER UTILITY G&A LEGAL SERVICES
10,638.50
1,616.35IT G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICECARTRIDGE CARE
1,616.35
222.64EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESCBIZ FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS INC
222.64
690.22FACILITY ROOM RENTAL GENERAL SUPPLIESCDW GOVERNMENT INC
86,581.63TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT
87,271.85
3,536.02DISCOUNT LOAN PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESCENTER ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT
8,907.55GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1,300.00MOVE-UP PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
13,743.57
5,621.06FACILITY OPERATIONS HEATING GASCENTERPOINT ENERGY
1,492.40PARK MAINTENANCE G & A HEATING GAS
329.74WESTWOOD G & A HEATING GAS
345.71NATURALIST PROGRAMMER HEATING GAS
124.75GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A HEATING GAS
7,292.82WATER UTILITY G&A HEATING GAS
407.45REILLY G & A HEATING GAS
379.88SEWER UTILITY G&A HEATING GAS
15,993.81
20,010.96FACILITY OPERATIONS HEATING GASCENTERPOINT ENERGY SERVICES IN
9,152.99ENTERPRISE G & A HEATING GAS
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 4j)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 6
2/1/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 8:55:47R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
6Page -Council Check Summary
1/28/2011 -12/30/2010
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
29,163.95
15,168.13EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S OTHER RETIREMENTCENTRAL PENSION FUND
15,168.13
43,243.00PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYCENTRAL STATES FIRE APPARATUS
43,243.00
91.18WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERSCENTURY 21 PASTRANA
91.18
25.00WATER UTILITY G&A NON-COMPLIANCE VIOLATIONS/FEESCHAMBERLIN, STEVEN
25.00
675.00BASKETBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESCHURCHILL, LEE
675.00
69.61GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESCINTAS FIRST AID & SAFETY
69.61
178.01-GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTSCITIZENS INDEPENDENT BANK
149.00ADMINISTRATION G & A TRAINING
177.58HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL SUPPLIES
100.00HUMAN RESOURCES RECOGNITION
353.79HUMAN RESOURCES CITE
115.00IT G & A TRAINING
26.61GENERAL INFORMATION MEETING EXPENSE
192.02GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
35.47POLICE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
153.00POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
5.16POLICE G & A SUBSISTENCE SUPPLIES
38.58POLICE G & A OFFICE EQUIPMENT
17.95POLICE G & A MEETING EXPENSE
970.44DARE PROGRAM OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
438.98OPERATIONSOFFICE SUPPLIES
1,450.77OPERATIONSGENERAL SUPPLIES
2,339.15OPERATIONSFIRE PREVENTION SUPPLIES
711.20OPERATIONSOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
884.46OPERATIONSSMALL TOOLS
20.69OPERATIONSEQUIPMENT PARTS
659.00OPERATIONSSUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
402.96OPERATIONSTRAINING
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 4j)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 7
2/1/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 8:55:47R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
7Page -Council Check Summary
1/28/2011 -12/30/2010
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
64.31OPERATIONSEMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
229.89PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORY
110.11-PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH DUE TO OTHER GOVTS
66.35ORGANIZED REC G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
1,945.00ORGANIZED REC G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
575.00-ORGANIZED REC G & A TRAINING
72.00HOLIDAY PROGRAMS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
28.93PRE-SCHOOL PROGRAMS GENERAL SUPPLIES
179.95WARMING HOUSES GENERAL SUPPLIES
200.43PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
21.00ENVIRONMENTAL G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
426.43TREE MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
21.43WESTWOOD G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
1,467.60WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
82.50VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
299.00PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES
145.80TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT
13,629.31
16,031.25PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDICLEARWATER RECREATION
16,031.25
1,012.30CONCESSIONS/HOCKEY ASSOC CONCESSION SUPPLIESCOCA-COLA BOTTLING CO
1,012.30
169.58INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESCOLBORN, CHRISTINE
169.58
15,489.40ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL SERVICESCOLICH & ASSOCIATES
15,489.40
436.60EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S WAGE GARNISHMENTSCOLLECTION SERVICES CENTER
436.60
77.51WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERSCOLLINS, AUDREY
77.51
479.85IT G & A DATACOMMUNICATIONSCOMCAST
479.85
9,855.00ORGANIZED REC G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESCOMMERCIAL RECREATION SPECIALI
9,855.00
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 4j)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 8
2/1/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 8:55:47R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
8Page -Council Check Summary
1/28/2011 -12/30/2010
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
812.65CE MATERIALS TESTING IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDICOMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION
812.65
3,374.10EMERGENCY REPAIR GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP S
3,374.10
220.00ENGINEERING G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSCONSTRUCTION BULLETIN
220.00
575.00PLUMBING MTCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICECORVAL CONSTRUCTORS INC
575.00
41.52-GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTSCREATIVE PRODUCT SOURCING INC
645.56DARE PROGRAM OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
604.04
790.88PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYCRYSTEEL TRUCK EQUIP INC
790.88
135.00INSPECTIONS G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESCSD
135.00
163.80POLICE G & A SUBSISTENCE SUPPLIESCUB FOODS
31.04DARE PROGRAM OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
14.94ERUOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
209.78
900.00SEWER UTILITY G&A OFFICE EQUIPMENTCUES INC
900.00STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OFFICE EQUIPMENT
1,800.00
1,913.06WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICECUSTOM VALVE NUT REPLACEMENT
1,913.06
5,146.79WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESDAKOTA SUPPLY GROUP
5,146.79
10,335.40GENERAL CUSTODIAL DUTIES CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SUPPLYDALCO ENTERPRISES INC
10,335.40
36.00YOUTH PROGRAMS PROGRAM REVENUEDAVIS, MICHELLE
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 4j)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 9
2/1/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 8:55:47R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
9Page -Council Check Summary
1/28/2011 -12/30/2010
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
36.00
1,455.00OPERATIONSOPERATIONAL SUPPLIESDE PAUL LETTERING
1,455.00
124.29GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEDEKO FACTORY SERVICE INC
124.29
8,256.09PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYDEPENDABLE TIRE INC
566.11GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
8,822.20
5,909.51EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A UNEMPLOYMENTDEPT EMPLOYMENT & ECONOMIC DEV
5,909.51
2,610.70INSPECTIONS G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTSDEPT LABOR & INDUSTRY
45.00STORM WATER UTILITY G&A LICENSES
2,655.70
510.00COMMUNICATIONS/GV REIMBURSEABL TELEPHONEDEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
510.00
229.65ENTERPRISE G & A ADVERTISINGDEX MEDIA EAST LLC
229.65
150.00GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESDIERSEN, HEATHER
150.00
855.47ELECTRICAL SYSTEM MTCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICEDJ ELECTRIC SERVICES INC
5,433.02PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES
6,288.49
67,906.00GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURESDLR GROUP KKE
67,906.00
4,104.16CAPITAL REPLACEMENT B/S PREPAID EXPENSESDLT SOLUTIONS INC
2,052.08TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
6,156.24
3,764.43SUPPORT SERVICES G&A POSTAGEDO-GOOD.BIZ INC
3,764.43
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 4j)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 10
2/1/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 8:55:47R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
10Page -Council Check Summary
1/28/2011 -12/30/2010
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
17,259.00STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICEDRYDEN EXCAVATNIG INC
17,259.00
162.50GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESDUBROSKY, CAROL
162.50
1,131.46PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURESDYNAMIC FASTENER
1,131.46
1,185.22BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESECOLAB INC
1,185.22
25,087.00SYSTEM REPAIR OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESEGAN COMPANIES INC
25,087.00
4,500.00MUNICIPAL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDIELECTRIC RESOURCE CONTRACTORS
4,500.00
368.01HOUSING REHAB BALANCE SHEET CONTRACTS PAYABLEELIOT VIEW NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN
368.01
1,220.70GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEEMERGENCY APPARATUS MTNCE
1,220.70
66.00ENGINEERING G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSENGINEERING MINNESOTA MAGAZINE
66.00
280.00DAILY ADMISSION OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESENTERTAINMENT PUBLICATIONS
280.00
1,470.75IT G & A OFFICE EQUIPMENTEXECUTIVE OFFICE CONCEPTS LTD
1,470.75
552.61PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYFACTORY MOTOR PARTS CO
552.61
65.77SEWER UTILITY G&A BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIESFASTENAL COMPANY
65.77
83.50ASSESSING G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CARFECHNER, MARTY
83.50
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 4j)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 11
2/1/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 8:55:47R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
11Page -Council Check Summary
1/28/2011 -12/30/2010
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
21.46POLICE G & A POSTAGEFEDEX
21.46
1,112.73WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESFERGUSON WATERWORKS
1,112.73
425.92ICE RESURFACER MOTOR FUELSFERRELLGAS
425.92
83.95FACILITIES MCTE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSFINE WOODWORKING
83.95
7,776.26OPERATIONSOPERATIONAL SUPPLIESFIRE EQUIPMENT SPECIALTIES INC
7,776.26
750.00POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESFISCHLER & ASSOCIATES PA
750.00
1,140.24GENERAL CUSTODIAL DUTIES EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEFLOYD TOTAL SECURITY
1,140.24
291.86PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYFORCE AMERICA INC
291.86
201.37GARAGE MTCE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEFORKLIFTS OF MN INC.
201.37
2,089.00STORM WATER UTILITY G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDIFOTH INFRASTRUCTURE & ENVIRONM
2,089.00
9,150.00TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENTFRANZ REPROGRAPHICS
9,150.00
1,000.00ESCROWSDEMO / BROOKSIDE TRAFFICFRERICKS, HANNAH
1,000.00
295.95ENGINEERING G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESG S DIRECT
295.95
1,295.57EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A TUITIONGARLAND, MIKAEL
1,295.57
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 4j)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 12
2/1/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 8:55:47R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
12Page -Council Check Summary
1/28/2011 -12/30/2010
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
944.00ARENA MAINTENANCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICEGARTNER REFRIG & MFG INC
98.50-ICE RESURFACER BUILDING MTCE SERVICE
845.50
10,500.00SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICEGENE'S WATER & SEWER INC.
10,500.00
252.95CONCESSIONS/HOCKEY ASSOC EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEGENERAL PARTS INC
252.95
10,640.00OPERATIONSTRAININGGLOBAL RISK INNOVATIONS INC
10,640.00
4,344.28EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S LONG TERM CARE INSURGLTC PREMIUM PAYMENTS
4,344.28
221.68WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICEGOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC
221.68
3,179.10GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIESGRAINGER INC, WW
268.13OPERATIONSBLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES
254.71INSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
354.68ARENA MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
224.76WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
4,281.38
105.00INSPECTIONS G & A FOOD AND BEVERAGEGRANITE CITY FOOD & BREWERY
105.00
1,480.00DAMAGE REPAIR OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESGRANITE LEDGE ELECTRICAL CONTR
1,480.00
840.55GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET CLEARING ACCOUNTGRAY, JANA
840.55
1,200.00IT G & A COMPUTER SERVICESGREEN, HOWARD R COMPANY
1,200.00
34,000.00GROUNDS MTCE LANDSCAPING MATERIALSHAGE CONCRETE WORKS
34,000.00
1,162.50BROOMBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESHAMILTON, MIKE
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 4j)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 13
2/1/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 8:55:47R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
13Page -Council Check Summary
1/28/2011 -12/30/2010
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
1,162.50
109.00PUBLIC WORKS G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CARHANSEN, SHANNON
109.00
212.00GENERAL CUSTODIAL DUTIES GENERAL SUPPLIESHARMON INC
212.00
40.00VOLLEYBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESHASLERUD, ALYSA
40.00
4,623.02WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIESHAWKINS INC
192.63WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
4,815.65
1,000.00ESCROWSDEMO / BROOKSIDE TRAFFICHAYDAM, ANNA
1,000.00
162.50GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESHAYDEN, MIKE
162.50
3,135.00OPERATIONSGENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESHEALTHPARTNERS
3,135.00
600.00PERFORMING ARTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESHELLO! BOOKING INC
600.00
285.00SUPPORT SERVICES TRAININGHEMP, CHARLES
285.00
100.00BASKETBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESHENDERSON, TRACY
100.00
175.00POLICE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSHENNEPIN COUNTY CHIEFS POLICE
175.00
6,001.00ADMINISTRATION G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEHENNEPIN COUNTY ELECTIONS
6,001.00
434.45IT G & A COMPUTER SERVICESHENNEPIN COUNTY INFO TECH
2,240.00POLICE G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
800.00OPERATIONSRADIO COMMUNICATIONS
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 4j)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 14
2/1/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 8:55:47R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
14Page -Council Check Summary
1/28/2011 -12/30/2010
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
256.00OPERATIONSEMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
3,730.45
20.63-GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTSHENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER
320.63OPERATIONSTRAINING
300.00
2,271.53GENERAL FUND G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESHENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
891.04POLICE G & A SUBSISTENCE SERVICE
522.00PARK AND REC G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
215.00PARK IMPROVEMENT G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
62.00PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
3,961.57
7,015.88TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENTHEWLETT-PACKARD CO
7,015.88
1,580.27WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICEHIGHVIEW PLUMBING INC
3,552.06SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
5,132.33
31.90GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESHOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
181.14ROUTINE MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
65.54ROUTINE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT PARTS
25.62PAINTINGBLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES
181.37PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
147.93SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
37.38BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
48.48WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES
112.82WATER UTILITY G&A BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES
76.08SEWER UTILITY G&A BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES
62.45SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
35.37STORM WATER UTILITY G&A SMALL TOOLS
1,006.08
3.89BRICK HOUSE (1324)OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESHOME DEPOT CREDIT SRVCS
3.89
61.20PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESHOME HARDWARE
65.41BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
17.09STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
143.70
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 4j)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 15
2/1/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 8:55:47R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
15Page -Council Check Summary
1/28/2011 -12/30/2010
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
543.48PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A ELECTRIC SERVICEHOPKINS, CITY OF
543.48
29.50ASSESSING G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CARHOPPE, MARK
29.50
29.76WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESHSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS
10.97YOUTH PROGRAMS GENERAL SUPPLIES
40.73
230.88PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYI-STATE TRUCK CENTER
230.88
1,601.75EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S UNION DUESI.U.O.E. LOCAL NO 49
1,601.75
45.00VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSIATN
45.00
6.29-PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH DUE TO OTHER GOVTSICE SKATING INST AMERICA
97.79INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS GENERAL SUPPLIES
91.50
1,200.00ADMINISTRATION G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSICMA
1,200.00
292.75OPERATIONSTELEPHONEINFINITY WIRELESS
292.75
4,918.69IT G & A TELEPHONEINTEGRA TELECOM
4,918.69
150.00E-911 PROGRAM OPERATIONAL SUPPLIESINTRADO INC
150.00
228.12-PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYINVER GROVE FORD
7,237.46GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
7,009.34
415.00OPERATIONSTRAININGINVER HILLS COMM COLLEGE
415.00
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 4j)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 16
2/1/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 8:55:47R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
16Page -Council Check Summary
1/28/2011 -12/30/2010
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
170.29ADMINISTRATION G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESIRON MOUNTAIN
127.47POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
297.76
2,388.00OPERATIONSOPERATIONAL SUPPLIESJEFFERSON FIRE & SAFETY INC
2,388.00
39.35PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYJERRY'S HARDWARE
46.32VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES
85.67
48.35PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESJOHNSON SUPPLY, JR
38.21BEAUTIFICATION / FLOWERS GENERAL SUPPLIES
86.56
50.96WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESJOHNSON, DICK
50.96
40,750.34ROUTINE MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESKASSA CONSTRUCTION, RON
70.07CONSTRUCTION PAYMENTS IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
20.23SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
2,403.24CONSTRUCTION PAYMENTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
43,243.88
463.84POLICE G & A POLICE EQUIPMENTKEEPRS INC
463.84
553.84EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S WAGE GARNISHMENTSKELLER, JASMINE Z
553.84
522.00FITNESS PROGRAMS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESKENWOOD GYMNASTICS CENTER
522.00
7.78HOUSING REHAB G & A MEETING EXPENSEKLESK, JANE
7.78
201.97PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYKREMER SPRING & ALIGNMENT LLC
1,856.92ACCIDENT REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
2,058.89
525.00OUTREACHOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESKROOG, RACHAEL
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 4j)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 17
2/1/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 8:55:47R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
17Page -Council Check Summary
1/28/2011 -12/30/2010
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
525.00
270.00HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESLABOR RELATIONS ASSOC
270.00
40.00YOUTH PROGRAMS PROGRAM REVENUELAMERE, JOSIE
40.00
780.11WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICELARSCO INC
780.11
3,073.58ELECTRICAL SYSTEM MTCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIESLARSON, JH CO
1,604.12SYSTEM REPAIR OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
4,677.70
2,184.00EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S UNION DUESLAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES
2,184.00
231.00HUMAN RIGHTS SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSLEAGUE OF HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISS
231.00
9,772.90EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A League of MN Cities dept'l expLEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES
9,772.90
3,083.98UNINSURED LOSS G&A UNINSURED LOSSLEAGUE OF MN CITIES INSURANCE
3,083.98
320.63HUMAN RESOURCES ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENTLEARNING JOURNEYS
320.63
36.50ORGANIZED REC G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CARLEE, KATIE
81.36WARMING HOUSES GENERAL SUPPLIES
117.86
194.00INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESLENTNER, LAURA
194.00
83.05POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESLEXISNEXIS
83.05
523.70HUMAN RESOURCES ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENTLIFESHINE COACHING AND CONSULT
523.70
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 4j)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 18
2/1/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 8:55:47R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
18Page -Council Check Summary
1/28/2011 -12/30/2010
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
2,042.02PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYLITTLE FALLS MACHINE INC
2,042.02
88,329.92IT G & A COMPUTER SERVICESLOGIS
100.00SUPPORT SERVICES G&A COMPUTER SERVICES
5,446.86OPERATIONSTRAINING
33,290.98TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT
127,167.76
66.00ORGANIZED REC G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CARLOMBARDI, JIM
66.00
1,250.55BOILER MTCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICELOUIS DEGIDIO SERVICES
1,250.55
101.00GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIESLOWELL'S REFINISH MASTERS
101.00
7,889.08PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURESLSV METALS INC
7,889.08
2,502.56PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYLUBRICATION TECHNOLOGIES INC
1,862.53VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES
4,365.09
175.53WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERSLUCKEROTH, KEITH
175.53
100.00INSPECTIONS G & A LICENSESM A H C O
100.00
2,194.54ACCIDENT REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEMAACO AUTO PAINTING
2,194.54
2,385.63PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYMACQUEEN EQUIP CO
2,385.63
10,500.00ENGINEERING G & A TRAININGMANAGED DESIGN LLC
10,500.00
138.38IT G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEMATRIX LASER CARE INC
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 4j)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 19
2/1/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 8:55:47R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
19Page -Council Check Summary
1/28/2011 -12/30/2010
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
138.38
532.22ENTERPRISE G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEMAXIMUM SOLUTIONS INC.
532.22
30.00INSPECTIONS G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSMEHA
80.00INSPECTIONS G & A TRAINING
30.00INSPECTIONS G & A LICENSES
140.00
85.48WATER UTILITY G&A BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIESMENARDS
20.53SEWER UTILITY G&A BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES
106.01
81.50PUBLIC WORKS G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CARMERKLEY, SCOTT
81.50
9,686.73PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESMETRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY
9,686.73
11,605.00ADMINISTRATION G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSMETRO CITIES
11,605.00
525.13OPERATIONSEQUIPMENT PARTSMETRO FIRE INC
525.13
761.13POLICE G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEMETRO SALES INC
761.13
424.00VOLLEYBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESMETRO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS
424.00
12,474.00INSPECTIONS G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTSMETROPOLITAN COUNCIL
15,869.11REILLY BUDGET CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SUPPLY
298,059.29OPERATIONSCLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE
326,402.40
4,183.47ADMINISTRATION G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESMID AMERICA BUSINESS SYSTEMS
2,091.73ASSESSING G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
6,275.20
53.90REILLY BUDGET EQUIPMENT PARTSMID AMERICA METER INC
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 4j)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 20
2/1/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 8:55:47R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
20Page -Council Check Summary
1/28/2011 -12/30/2010
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
53.90
250.00POLICE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSMID-STATES ORGANIZED CRIME INF
250.00
49,250.10PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYMIDWAY FORD
49,250.10
9,816.17WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESMIDWEST ASPHALT CORP
9,816.17
11.54POLICE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESMIDWEST BADGE & NOVELTY CO
11.54
1,455.00WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESMIDWEST TESTING LLC
1,455.00
282.60PAWN FEES OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESMINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPT
282.60
73.95ASSESSING G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSMINNEAPOLIS ST PAUL BUSINESS J
73.95
145.24EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S ACCRUED OTHER BENEFITSMINNESOTA BENEFIT ASSOC
145.24
65.00VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSMINNESOTA CHAPTER OF NIGP
65.00
2,522.41EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S WAGE GARNISHMENTSMINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PYT CT
2,522.41
227.19GENERAL CUSTODIAL DUTIES EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEMINNESOTA CONWAY
227.19
145.00ENTERPRISE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSMINNESOTA ICE ARENA MGRS ASSOC
145.00
435.00SUPPORT SERVICES TRAININGMINNESOTA JUVENILE OFFICERS
435.00
16.00EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S ACCRUED OTHER BENEFITSMINNESOTA NCPERS LIFE INS
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 4j)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 21
2/1/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 8:55:47R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
21Page -Council Check Summary
1/28/2011 -12/30/2010
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
16.00
2,400.00SEWER UTILITY G&A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTATMINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AG
2,400.00
375.00FINANCE G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTATMINNESOTA STATE AUDITOR
375.00
17,710.00INSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESMINNETONKA, CITY OF
2,755.20TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT
20,465.20
123.33SUPPORT SERVICES G&A OFFICE SUPPLIESMINUTEMAN PRESS
123.33
64.50WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESMN DNR
64.50
735.00PUBLIC WORKS G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSMN TRANSPORTATION ALLIANCE
735.00
154.97OPERATIONSTRAININGMNFIAM BOOK SALES
154.97
550.00ADMINISTRATION G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESMORRISON & ASSOCIATES INC
550.00
46,212.32SANDING/SALTING OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESMORTON SALT
46,212.32
140.00HUMAN RESOURCES TRAININGMPELRA
140.00
344.42PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYMTI DISTRIBUTING CO
344.42
265.00REILLY BUDGET OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESMVTL LABORATORIES
265.00
26.69H.V.A.C. EQUIP. MTCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIESNAPA (GENUINE PARTS CO)
1,823.22PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORY
32.78TREE MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 4j)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 22
2/1/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 8:55:47R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
22Page -Council Check Summary
1/28/2011 -12/30/2010
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
27.54BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
51.17ICE RESURFACER BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES
458.18GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES
13.23SEWER UTILITY G&A BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES
48.76SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
2,481.57
97.50ASSESSING G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CARNATHANSON, BRIDGET
97.50
75.00ENGINEERING G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTATNCITE
75.00
269.33STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICENEENAH FOUNDREY
269.33
105.85ADMINISTRATION G & A TELEPHONENEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
150.13HUMAN RESOURCES TELEPHONE
478.46RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT TELEPHONE
98.85ASSESSING G & A TELEPHONE
183.00FINANCE G & A TELEPHONE
286.58EDA / HA REIMBURSEMENT TELEPHONE
880.94POLICE G & A TELEPHONE
387.86OPERATIONSTELEPHONE
98.85INSPECTIONS G & A TELEPHONE
379.45ENGINEERING G & A TELEPHONE
501.26PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A TELEPHONE
145.30PARK AND REC G&A TELEPHONE
253.49ORGANIZED REC G & A TELEPHONE
251.94PARK MAINTENANCE G & A TELEPHONE
104.19ENVIRONMENTAL G & A TELEPHONE
335.26WESTWOOD G & A TELEPHONE
98.85REC CENTER/AQUATIC PARK SAL TELEPHONE
100.41VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A TELEPHONE
396.97WATER UTILITY G&A TELEPHONE
210.12SEWER UTILITY G&A TELEPHONE
17.54SOLID WASTE G&A TELEPHONE
5,465.30
796.06GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICENISSAN
796.06
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 4j)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 23
2/1/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 8:55:47R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
23Page -Council Check Summary
1/28/2011 -12/30/2010
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
112.54WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICENORDBLOM PLUMBING
112.54
800.00ORGANIZED REC G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESNORTH STAR ART GLASS INC
800.00
883.00HUMAN RESOURCES RECRUITMENTNORTH WORKS OCCUPATIONAL HEALT
129.66TRAININGGENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
564.00ERUGENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
316.32ENGINEERING G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
561.64TRAININGGENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
419.32VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
561.86WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
432.20TRAININGGENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
3,868.00
421.00GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET UNREALIZED REVENUENORTHWEST METRO DRUG TASK FORC
421.00
102.00HUMAN RESOURCES RECRUITMENTNORTHWORKS OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
102.00
500.00POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESOAK KNOLL ANIMAL HOSPITAL
500.00
176.00INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESOBERSTAR, KATIE
176.00
200.64TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENTOCE NORTH AMERICA INC
200.64
120.08ADMINISTRATION G & A OFFICE SUPPLIESOFFICE DEPOT
97.85HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICE SUPPLIES
117.99SUPPORT SERVICES G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
267.34ASSESSING G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
22.34FINANCE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
63.37GENERAL INFORMATION OFFICE SUPPLIES
2,274.75OFFICE EQUIPMENT DESIGN/PROCUR OTHER
91.51POLICE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
76.40POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
231.48SUPPORT SERVICES OFFICE SUPPLIES
807.89OPERATIONSOFFICE SUPPLIES
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 4j)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 24
2/1/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 8:55:47R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
24Page -Council Check Summary
1/28/2011 -12/30/2010
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
304.78OPERATIONSGENERAL SUPPLIES
215.18OPERATIONSFIRE PREVENTION SUPPLIES
1,156.13OPERATIONSTRAINING
136.92INSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
140.22PUBLIC WORKS G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
23.66ENGINEERING G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
130.82ORGANIZED REC G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
6,278.71
120.00POLICE G & A LICENSESOFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STA
120.00WATER UTILITY G&A LICENSES
240.00
240.42-PARK IMPROVE BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTSON DECK SPORTS
3,737.42PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
3,497.00
85.50OFF-LEASH DOG PARK OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESON SITE SANITATION
85.50
9,721.35TREE MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESOSTVIG TREE INC
9,721.35
280.00BASKETBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESPETERSEN, CHRISTA
280.00
93.00POLICE G & A TRAVEL/MEETINGSPETTY CASH
20.00POLICE G & A LICENSES
10.00SUPPORT SERVICES OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
44.14ORGANIZED REC G & A TRAINING
4.75ORGANIZED REC G & A MEETING EXPENSE
17.00ORGANIZED REC G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR
6.00ENVIRONMENTAL G & A TRAINING
27.00ENVIRONMENTAL G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
6.96BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
228.85
45.00NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH TRAININGPLYMOUTH, CITY OF
45.00
74.68INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS GENERAL SUPPLIESPOLK, MARLA
783.19INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 4j)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 25
2/1/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 8:55:47R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
25Page -Council Check Summary
1/28/2011 -12/30/2010
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
857.87
370.31PARK MAINTENANCE G & A TELEPHONEPOPP TELECOM
370.31
90.00POLICE G & A LICENSESPOST BOARD
90.00
5,000.00SUPPORT SERVICES G&A POSTAGEPOSTMASTER
5,000.00
185.00SUPPORT SERVICES G&A POSTAGEPOSTMASTER - PERMIT #603
500.87WATER UTILITY G&A POSTAGE
500.87SEWER UTILITY G&A POSTAGE
500.86SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS POSTAGE
500.87STORM WATER UTILITY G&A POSTAGE
2,188.47
326.79PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYPRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN
326.79
9,235.07TREE DISEASE PRIVATE CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICEPRECISION LANDSCAPE & TREE
4,658.68TREE DISEASE PUBLIC CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE
13,893.75
144.00ICE RESURFACER EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEPRINTERS SERVICE INC
144.00
1,358.14WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESPROGRESSIVE CONSULTING ENGINEE
1,358.14
93.21BLDG/GROUNDS OPS & MAINT BUILDING MTCE SERVICEPUMP & METER SERVICE
93.21
191.70STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICEQ3 CONTRACTING
191.70
446.96PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYQUEST ENGINEERING INC
446.96
217.12VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A POSTAGEQUICKSILVER EXPRESS COURIER
217.12
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 4j)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 26
2/1/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 8:55:47R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
26Page -Council Check Summary
1/28/2011 -12/30/2010
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
70.99IT G & A TELEPHONEQWEST
143.08COMMUNICATIONS/GV REIMBURSEABL TELEPHONE
214.07
16.55ICE RESURFACER BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIESR & R SPECIALTIES
1,259.25ICE RESURFACER EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
1,275.80
2,705.00PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURESR&J INSULATION INC
2,705.00
2,187.26FACILITY OPERATIONS GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICERANDY'S SANITATION INC
986.45REC CENTER BUILDING GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE
96.16WATER UTILITY G&A GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE
899.54SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE
4,169.41
88.18WATER UTILITY G&A POSTAGERAPID GRAPHICS & MAILING
88.17SEWER UTILITY G&A POSTAGE
88.17SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS POSTAGE
88.17STORM WATER UTILITY G&A POSTAGE
352.69
225.00SOLID WASTE G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSRECYCLING ASSOC OF MN
225.00
2,941.21SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS OTHERREHRIG PACIFIC CO
2,941.21
282.46GENERAL CUSTODIAL DUTIES GENERAL SUPPLIESRETROFIT COMPANIES INC
282.46
900.00ORGANIZED REC G & A TRAININGRICE LEADERSHIP CONSULTING, ML
900.00
164.50ORGANIZED REC G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CARROSA, NATE
19.15SPECIAL PROGRAMS GENERAL SUPPLIES
26.53SPECIAL EVENTS GENERAL SUPPLIES
210.18
219.28OPERATIONSOPERATIONAL SUPPLIESROSHOLT, PAUL
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 4j)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 27
2/1/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 8:55:47R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
27Page -Council Check Summary
1/28/2011 -12/30/2010
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
219.28
40.00INSPECTIONS G & A MULTI-FAMILY HOUSINGRUBEL REALTY
40.00
1,550.18EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A TUITIONRUD, JOSEPH
1,550.18
392.00BASKETBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESRUDDY, WILLIAM
392.00
17,000.00ESCROWSDEMO / BROOKSIDE TRAFFICS&H HOMES LLC
17,000.00
1,072.60STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICESA-AG INC
1,072.60
1,250.00ESCROWSDEMO / BROOKSIDE TRAFFICSAARI, DUANE & JUDITH
1,250.00
2.49-GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTSSAFE RIDE NEWS PUBLICATIONS
38.69OPERATIONSTRAINING
36.20
218.68OPERATIONSGENERAL SUPPLIESSAM'S CLUB
1,087.78OPERATIONSEMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
139.18-HOLIDAY PROGRAMS GENERAL SUPPLIES
294.11CONCESSIONSGENERAL SUPPLIES
1,521.16WESTWOOD G & A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
353.56YOUTH PROGRAMS GENERAL SUPPLIES
3,336.11
138.79ADMINISTRATION G & A MEETING EXPENSESCHAAKE COMPANY, AJ
138.79
405.00GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESSCHAEFER, JONATHAN
405.00
2,939.67ORGANIZED REC G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESSCHOENBAUER CONSULTING LLC
2,939.67
156.00ASSESSING G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CARSCHOMER, KELLEY
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 4j)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 28
2/1/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 8:55:47R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
28Page -Council Check Summary
1/28/2011 -12/30/2010
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
156.00
64.35WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIESSEARS COMMERCIAL ONE
64.35
308.00STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESSEH
308.00
70.00HOUSING REHAB G & A TRAININGSENSIBLE LAND USE COALITION
70.00
180.00HUMAN RESOURCES SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSSHRM
180.00
2,115.50PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURESSIGNATURE MECHANICAL INC
2,115.50
1,401.65EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S UNION DUESSLP ASSOC OF FIREFIGHTERS #993
1,401.65
250.26-GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTSSMT HEALTH SYSTEMS
3,890.26OPERATIONSTRAINING
3,640.00
1,300.00ERUTRAININGSOTA
1,300.00
165.87-PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH DUE TO OTHER GOVTSSOUTHERN ALUMINUM MFG INC
2,578.57WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
2,412.70
3,270.81TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE FURNITURE & EQUIPMENTSPECTRA
3,270.81
2,168.79IT G & A DATACOMMUNICATIONSSPRINT
30.00SUPPORT SERVICES OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
2,198.79
241.60PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESSPS COMPANIES INC
18.38BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
259.98
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 4j)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 29
2/1/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 8:55:47R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
29Page -Council Check Summary
1/28/2011 -12/30/2010
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
4,295.86ESCROWSGENERALSRF CONSULTING GROUP INC
17,851.88PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
3,116.86CE INSPECTION IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
892.60CE DESIGN IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
4.95RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
26,162.15
412.38WESTWOOD G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICESTANLEY CONVERGENT SECURITY SO
412.38
224.40ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL NOTICESSTAR TRIBUNE
224.40
169.93PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYSTONEBROOKE EQUIPMENT INC
169.93
1,803.52TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENTSTRATEGIC INSIGHTS CO
1,803.52
5,849.71POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIESSTREICHER'S
5,849.71
27.40FINANCE G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CARSULANDER, PAT
27.40
4,858.75REILLY BUDGET GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESSUMMIT ENVIROSOLUTIONS INC
4,858.75
110.84ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL NOTICESSUN NEWSPAPERS
487.00SOLID WASTE G&A ADVERTISING
597.84
78,295.28SUNSET RIDGE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESSUNSET RIDGE CONDOMINIUM ASSN
78,295.28
639.00SPECIAL PROJECTS BUILDING MTCE SERVICESWANSON & YOUNGDALE INC
639.00
15.53POLICE G & A SUBSISTENCE SUPPLIESTARGET BANK
12.89POLICE G & A MEETING EXPENSE
28.42
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 4j)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 30
2/1/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 8:55:47R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
30Page -Council Check Summary
1/28/2011 -12/30/2010
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
33.54ADMINISTRATION G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESTELELANGUAGE INC
33.54
636.84GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICETERMINIX INT
636.84
2,550.00REILLY BUDGET OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESTESTAMERICA LABORATORIES INC
2,550.00
15.00OPERATIONSOPERATIONAL SUPPLIESTEXA TONKA TAILORING
15.00
208.00INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESTHOMPSON, HOLLY
208.00
723.94BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICETHYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR
723.94
343.32INSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESTILTON, JOHN
343.32
1,220.00ADMINISTRATION G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESTIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL
1,220.00
284.44PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYTOWMASTER
284.44
327.00BEAUTIFICATION / FLOWERS LANDSCAPING MATERIALSTREE TRUST
2,200.00WESTWOOD G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
3,000.00PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
5,527.00
15,496.36PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYTRI STATE BOBCAT
15,496.36
2,912.48PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURESTWIN CITY HARDWARE
2,912.48
1,450.36SNOW PLOWING OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESTWIN CITY OUTDOOR SERVICES INC
51,240.00SSD 1 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
17,114.00SSD 3 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
69,804.36
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 4j)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 31
2/1/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 8:55:47R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
31Page -Council Check Summary
1/28/2011 -12/30/2010
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
213.75GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICETWIN CITY POWDER COATING
213.75
30.00ADMINISTRATION G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTATTWIN WEST CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
30.00
6,043.04GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEUHL CO INC
6,043.04
848.25SUPPORT SERVICES OPERATIONAL SUPPLIESUNIFORMS UNLIMITED (PD)
2,047.38SUPERVISORYOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
4,351.57PATROLOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
53.42COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
7,300.62
522.00EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S UNITED WAYUNITED WAY OF MINNEAPOLIS AREA
522.00
580.00ENGINEERING G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTATUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA REGIST
580.00
110.00POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESUNO DOS TRES COMMUNICATIONS
110.00
473.60TREE DISEASE PRIVATE CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICEUPPER CUT TREE SERVICE
473.60
10.47VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A POSTAGEUPS STORE
10.47
560.46OPERATIONSTELEPHONEUSA MOBILITY WIRELESS INC
31.06WATER UTILITY G&A TELEPHONE
591.52
507.90HUMAN RESOURCES RECOGNITIONVAIL, LORI
190.50HUMAN RESOURCES MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR
698.40
66.33GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIESVALLEY NATIONAL GASES WV LLC
35.06SEWER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES
101.39
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 4j)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 32
2/1/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 8:55:47R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
32Page -Council Check Summary
1/28/2011 -12/30/2010
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
10,842.40WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICEVALLEY-RICH CO INC
10,842.40
200.00BASKETBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESVANG, WILLIAM
200.00
109.00ENVIRONMENTAL G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CARVAUGHAN, JIM
109.00
7,500.00ESCROWSDEMO / BROOKSIDE TRAFFICVEIT & CO
36,178.66GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES
8,218.00PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES
51,896.66
40.00SUPPORT SERVICES OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESVERIFIED CREDENTIALS
40.00
1,263.26VOICE SYSTEM MTCE TELEPHONEVERIZON WIRELESS
73.26COMMUNICATIONS/GV REIMBURSEABL TELEPHONE
1,336.52
403.00BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICEVIKING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER
403.00
89.70WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIESVIKING INDUSTRIAL CTR
89.70
29,424.50CONSTRUCTION PAYMENTS IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDIVISU-SEWER CLEAN & SEAL
675.00STORM WATER UTILITY G&A MAINTENANCE
30,099.50
90.35ORGANIZED REC G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CARVOELKER, STACY M
90.35
484.37RELAMPINGOTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESVOSS LIGHTING
484.37
96.19PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYWALDOCH
6.19-PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH DUE TO OTHER GOVTS
90.00
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 4j)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 33
2/1/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 8:55:47R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
33Page -Council Check Summary
1/28/2011 -12/30/2010
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
32.14PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYWALSER CHRYSLER JEEP
32.14
69.00SOLID WASTE G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSWASTE & RECYCLING NEWS
69.00
227.12WESTWOOD G & A GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICEWASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN
1,616.35SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS MOTOR FUELS
57,035.11SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE
23,805.60SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS YARD WASTE SERVICE
28,192.52SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE
110,876.70
2,010.50WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICEWATER CONSERVATION SERVICE INC
2,010.50
51.05PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYWAYTEK
9.33GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES
60.38
650.00BASKETBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESWELDON, DAN
650.00
257.57BOILER MTCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICEWET TECHNOLOGY INC
257.57
88.91WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERSWHITMORE, JANE
88.91
20.00ORGANIZED REC G & A TRAININGWOMEN IN LEISURE SERVICES
20.00
536.00GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURESWSB ASSOC INC
536.00
14,773.30FACILITY OPERATIONS ELECTRIC SERVICEXCEL ENERGY
20.94OPERATIONSELECTRIC SERVICE
35,838.64PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE
256.53PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE ELECTRIC SERVICE
37.01BRICK HOUSE (1324)ELECTRIC SERVICE
69.64WW RENTAL HOUSE (1322)ELECTRIC SERVICE
335.24WESTWOOD G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 4j)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 34
2/1/2011CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 8:55:47R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
34Page -Council Check Summary
1/28/2011 -12/30/2010
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
13,812.58ENTERPRISE G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE
23,871.57WATER UTILITY G&A ELECTRIC SERVICE
22.39OPERATIONSELECTRIC SERVICE
2,128.36REILLY BUDGET ELECTRIC SERVICE
3,559.36SEWER UTILITY G&A ELECTRIC SERVICE
1,696.63STORM WATER UTILITY G&A ELECTRIC SERVICE
166.29OPERATIONSELECTRIC SERVICE
96,588.48
20.44SUPPORT SERVICES OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESYAHOO
20.44
58,955.95PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYYOCUM OIL CO INC
58,955.95
14.00YOUTH PROGRAMS PROGRAM REVENUEZACHEK, WING
14.00
340.79STORM WATER UTILITY G&A SMALL TOOLSZACKS INC
340.79
435.93GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIESZEP MFG
435.93
1,361.86PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYZIEGLER INC
1,445.41GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
2,807.27
72.58ORGANIZED REC G & A PRINTING & PUBLISHINGZIP PRINTING
55.34TREE MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
127.92
Report Totals 2,283,555.92
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 4j)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 35
Meeting Date: February 7, 2011
Agenda Item #: 8a
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Resolution Approving Annual City Manager Evaluation.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to Adopt a Resolution for formal acceptance of the final City Manager annual evaluation.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Does Council wish to formally accept the annual City Manager evaluation?
BACKGROUND:
On Monday, January 24, 2011, the Council met in a closed executive session to discuss the
annual City Manager evaluation. J. Forrest, consultant, reviewed the results and facilitated the
discussion with the Council.
The Mayor Pro Tem will provide a summary of the evaluation results.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Not directly applicable.
Attachments: Resolution
Prepared by: Ali Fosse, HR Coordinator
Reviewed by: Nancy Deno Gohman, Deputy City Manager/HR Director
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 8a) Page 2
Subject: Resolution Approving Annual City Manager Evaluation
RESOLUTION NO. 11-_____
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE
ANNUAL CITY MANAGER EVALUATION
WHEREAS, the City Council provides an opportunity to hold an annual evaluation of
the City Manager; and
WHEREAS, on January 24, 2011, an Executive Session of the Council was held to
discuss the evaluation; and
WHEREAS, J. Forrest, consultant, facilitated the conversation with the Council to
finalize the evaluation;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of St. Louis
Park hereby accepts the annual evaluation of the City Manager.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council February 7, 2011
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Meeting Date: February 7, 2011
Agenda Item #: 8b
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Resolution Approving 2011 Compensation for the City Manager.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to adopt a resolution confirming a 2.25% general increase for the City Manager effective
January 1, 2011.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Does Council wish to confirm the recommended 2011 compensation increase for the City
Manager?
BACKGROUND:
Council has confirmed the City Manager’s decision to implement a 2.25% general increase for
non-organized employees, Police Officers and Sergeants for 2011 (effective December 31,
2010). The City Manager’s salary was not included with the earlier approval as to give Council
time to complete his annual performance evaluation. Now that the evaluation is complete, it is
recommended that the general increase be processed. The following is information on the City
Manager salary:
Salary Cap & City Manager Salary
The contract for the City Manager states that base salary and benefits must be set when
salaries are established for other non-union employees. As in past years, it was decided
to wait to set the City Manager’s salary for 2011 until the Council had the opportunity to
complete the City Manager’s 2010 performance evaluation discussion. The evaluation
was conducted on January 24, 2011, and now Council can move forward with the salary
increase for the City Manager.
General information
Salary Cap: The salary cap is reviewed annually and adjusted. The Minnesota
Management and Budget Office (MMB) has issued a statement that the salary cap for
2011 will increase from $150,065 to $151,866.
The City Manager and other Department Heads received a 0% wage increase for 2010.
The 2009 and 2010 annual salary for City Manager is $150,065, not including car
allowance. Car allowance is subject to Paid Time Off (PTO), in accordance with policy.
2011 Pay Range: After review of the regional market data in the United States, and
consultant recommendation, the pay range for City Manager was increased by 2.25%
effective December 31, 2010, consistent with all other non-union staff. This would set
the pay range at $130,425 to $153,441.
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 8b) Page 2
Subject: Resolution Approving 2011 Compensation for the City Manager
2011 Salary: A 2.25% increase to the City Manager’s salary would equal $153,441 as
applied as follows:
It is recommended that effective January 1, 2011, Council approves an annual salary of
$151,866 annually ($73.013 hourly) for the City Manager, not including car allowance, in
accordance with the salary cap. Car allowance of $600 per month will be subject to the
PTO program. In addition, Council approves 21.57 hours of PTO for the City Manager
in 2011 (21.57 * $73.013 = $1,575).
Paid Time Off (PTO Program)
The PTO program was approved by Council and part of the City’s Personnel Manual.
Section 9.13 Paid Time Off (PTO) Program states: Effective 01/01/02, exempt
employees, including the City Manager, who reach the salary limit requirements of M.S.
43A.17, Subd. 9, shall receive equivalent hours above the limit in paid leave (PTO).
Amount of paid leave (PTO) is determined by the City Council. Paid leave (PTO) is
typically accrued on a per pay period basis, although the Council may issue paid leave
(PTO) as a lump sum amount of time. Paid leave (PTO) may be used as earned,
maintained in a paid leave (PTO) bank or cashed out upon separation of employment.
Paid leave (PTO) is separate and not part of the flex leave program (Resolution 02-127).
Each July 31, all hours in the PTO balance must transfer to a Health Care Savings Plan
account established for the employee in accordance with plan requirements (Resolution
05-104).
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
The items recommended for approval have been included in the 2011 budget.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Not directly applicable.
Attachments: Resolution
Prepared by: Ali Fosse, HR Coordinator
Reviewed by: Nancy Deno Gohman, Deputy City Manager/HR Director
City Council Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 8b) Page 3
Subject: Resolution Approving 2011 Compensation for the City Manager
RESOLUTION NO. 11-____
RESOLUTION SETTING SALARY FOR THE CITY MANAGER
WHEREAS, Thomas K. Harmening has served continuously as the City Manager of St.
Louis Park since his appointment by Council on January 20, 2004, and
WHEREAS, each year the Council reviews compensation and sets an increase consistent
with market and other employee groups,
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis
Park:
Effective January 1, 2011, Council approves a salary of $151,866 for the City Manager
not including car allowance. Salary application must comply with the salary limitations set by
statute; therefore, PTO applies to the City Manager’s car allowance of $600 per month. Council
also approves an additional 21.57 hours of PTO for the City Manager in 2011.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council February 7, 2011
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Meeting Date: February 7, 2011
Agenda Item #: 3
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Highway 100 Project Update.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
The purpose of this report and study session discussion is to review Hwy 100 project goals
previously developed by the City of St. Louis Park and further evaluate Mn/DOT Concepts B
and C with those goals in mind.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
As discussed at the January 24 Study Session, Mn/DOT is proposing Concept B as their favored
concept based upon their understanding of the City’s goals at this time; however, Concept C also
seems acceptable to both Mn/DOT and Hennepin County. Both Mn/DOT and Hennepin County
do not feel Concepts A or D should be considered further. To help Mn/DOT decide on a
preferred alternate, the following Council input is desired:
1. Does Council have a preference for any of the concepts, in particular B, C or a
combination of both?
2. What specific design features does Council like or dislike in any of the concepts?
3. What, if any, further information will Council require to further evaluate these concepts?
BACKGROUND:
History - City and Mn/DOT staff discussed this proposed project with Council at the January 24,
2011 Study Session at which time Mn/DOT staff explained concepts B and C (attached) and
answered questions. Council seemed to express an interest in concept C with a two way frontage
road on the east side of Hwy 100 south of Minnetonka Blvd along with retention of the W27th
Street entrance ramp to southbound Hwy 100. In addition, the following issues were identified
during the course of the Study Session discussion held on the 24th:
Determine impact on Toledo homes, if any; - i.e., construction limits, noise walls,
acquisition.
Work with property owners on preference for noise walls or vegetated berms
Minimize cut through in neighborhoods and congestion on local streets
Keep a direct access to SB Hwy 100 from Minnetonka Blvd (make access as easy as
possible)
Take existing n/s bike trail into account; how do we extend north to the North Cedar Lake
Regional Trail?
Mitigate congestion on Hwy 100 to reduce local traffic
Determine if frontage road traffic will stack up
What are the safety requirements/considerations?
Utica Avenue – what will be done north of Minnetonka Blvd? (answer - this is up to the
city)
Special Study Session Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 3) Page 2
Subject: Highway 100 Project Update
How wide are bike lanes/sidewalks on Minnetonka bridge (answer - 12 feet)
Is any part of Webster Park being taken? (answer - no)
Does the bike/ped bridge on 26th remain? (answer - yes)
Current - Since the Study Session, Mn/DOT has started reviewing the idea of a two way
frontage road on the east side of Hwy 100 south of Minnetonka Blvd in Concept C. They are
also evaluating traffic concerns associated with the southbound Hwy 100 entrance ramp at W.
27th Street. Based on staff conversations this week, it appears Mn/DOT feels the W. 27th Street
entrance ramp will have to be closed.
Staff felt it was somewhat difficult to evaluate the concepts based on the Mn/DOT evaluation
criteria (presented at the last Study Session) and so created another evaluation matrix
(attachment: SLP Concept Evaluation Criteria - 02.07.11) with different criteria in an attempt to
allow staff and Council to better understand these concepts. Please note the column “2005”
which was included for comparison purposes; it is an attempt to portray conditions in 2005
before the “Interim Project” was undertaken. We are also attaching criteria (project goals) that
were developed by the City of St. Louis Park and presented to the Commissioner of
Transportation last spring (attachment: SLP Hwy 100 Design Criteria) which should be
beneficial in evaluating these concepts from the City’s perspective.
Next Steps - Mn/DOT has developed the following tentative schedule for this project:
Mn/DOT Selection of a Preferred Alternative January 2011
Traffic Modeling / Operational Analysis February - March 2011
Mn/DOT Staff Approved Geometric Layout June 2011
Public Open House June 2011
Municipal Consent Approval Process July - December 2011
Final Geometric Layout January 2012
Develop Construction Plans and Specifications January 2012 - September 2015
Open Bids November 2015
Construction 2016 thru 2018
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
None.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
The following Strategic Direction and focus area was identified by Council in 2007:
St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged community.
Focus will be on:
Promoting regional transportation issues and related dedicated funding sources affecting
St. Louis Park including but not limited to Hwy 100 and SWLRT.
Attachments: Concepts B and C
SLP Concept Evaluation Criteria - 02.07.11
SLP Hwy 100 Design Criteria
Prepared by: Michael P. Rardin, Public Works Director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
10 05101010290295300295300875584015207800
10785790840845 152078579055875875404550556010152025202510 58355605655705755800595 10045 50 5560556055601015201010151015202530 5101520253010 1510152025 10152010101585DATE:12/8/2010SUBJECT TO CHANGEPRELIMINARYSUBJECT TO CHANGEPRELIMINARYDATE:12/8/2010SUBJECT TO CHANGEPRELIMINARYDATE:12/8/2010SUBJECT TO CHANGEPRELIMINARYDATE:12/8/2010SUBJECT TO CHANGEPRELIMINARYDATE:12/8/2010SUBJECT TO CHANGEPRELIMINARYDATE:12/8/2010SUBJECT TO CHANGEPRELIMINARYDATE:12/8/2010SUBJECT TO CHANGEPRELIMINARYDATE:12/8/2010UNITED METHODIST CHURCH ALDERSGATEFIRE STATION #1COAT FACTORY BURLINGTONLUGGAGE WORLDUNIVERSALCENTER OF MN4 WHEEL DRIVETHE OLIVER PRESSDOUGLAS CORP.SERVICE CO AUTOMOBILEPLUMBINGMOTZKOTOMREFRIGERATION INC. SOUTH TOWNMN CONCRETE SPECIALITIESVFWAUTO BROKERS INTEGRITYREBERS HOMESBYERLYSTARGETWALSER FORDGOODYEARAARCEE PARTY & TENT RENTALAUDIO KING WAREHOUSEMcGARVEY COFFEECITY SCAPEAPTS.NORDIC WARE DATA SOURCE HAGENYOSEMITE AVE.36TH ST. W.36TH ST. W.PARK CENTER BLVD.GOODRICH AVE.35TH ST. W.34TH ST.XENWOOD AVE. S.WEBSTER AVE. S.33RD ST.WEBSTER AVE. S.LAKE ST.MINNETONKA BLVD.ROLLER GARDENCOLONIAL TERRACESTORECONVENIENCEMARATHONLINK BROS. FLORISTMINI MALLGROVES ACADEMYMINNETONKA TERRACEHOLIDAYUTICA AVE. S.VERNON AVE. S.29TH ST. W.28TH ST. W.28TH ST. W.27TH ST. W.VERNON AVE. S.UTICA AVE. S.THE REFORMATIONLUTHERAN CHURCH OFTHE COURTYARD APTS.PARK RIDGE APTS.UTICA AVE. S.STEPHENS DR.WIN STEHENS JEEP BUICK DEALERSHIPUSED CARSWIN STEPHENS BUICKEAST FRONTAGE RD.BENILDE ST. MARGARETBENILDE ST. MARGARET SCHOOLBENILDE ST. MARGARET SCHOOLBETHEL SYNAGOGUEPARKWOOD RD.25 ST. W.26TH ST. W. RALIEGH AVE. S.TOLEDO AVE. S.27TH ST. W.28TH ST. W.TOLEDO AVE. S.SALEM AVE. S.29TH ST. W.MINNETONKA BLVD.ST. GEORGES CHURCHAUTOMATIVEDUNRITETOLEDO AVE. S.31ST ST. W.SALEM AVE. S.& UNDERGROUND GARAGEBRITTANY APARTMENTS RALIEGH AVE. S.QUENTIN AVE. S.PRINCETON AVE. S.PRINCETON AVE. S.27TH ST. W.28TH ST. W.26TH ST. W.OTTAWA AVE. S.OTTAWA PL.OTTAWA AVE. S.BELTLINE BLVD.PARK GLEN RD.RALEIGH AVE. S.CENTER BLVD.WOODDA LE AVE.XENWOOD AVE. S.35 1/2 ST.WEBSTER AVE. S.XENWOOD AVE. S.26TH ST. W.26TH ST. W.25 1/2 ST.336033563352334833693361335533493343334133693337335033443340314831403130562356195601312131293133314131473153315731613205321132173225323132353241326532735530295329455524550029482944293429302918291029572955292529192913290729012851284528412835283128012785277727732769276527572753274927452737273327292725271727132709270126552651264726452643264126312600260426102616262026242700270827122716272027242728273227382742275027582764276827722780278828002804280828162824283228402848285629002910291829263148314431383132312831113101304730453033302930215227522352195209520752033044304830523100310831123116312031493145314131353131312531173109310531013057305530453035303130253021301329392933292529212917291329092901285528512847283528312829281928152801275127472743273527252715270927052701265726492645263526252600260826122616262026242632263626442648265627002704270827122716272427282736274027442750510851122937293329292925291929152907290129162920292429302936UTICA AVE. S.to solicit input from the affected units.A public involvement process will then take placewill be proposed as part the proposed project.Noise barriers found to be feasible and reasonable part of the required environmental process.A detailed Noise Analysis will be performed as36TH AVE SMN TH100MN TH 7CSAH 25CSAH 5CSAH 5MN TH 100COAT FACTORY BURLINGTONCONCEPT B 10-30-2010TH100 SP 2734-3378579079580080581081582082583083584084585085586086587087578579078579012’ INP12’ INP12’ INPINP ACCELVAR SHLD INP12’ AUX12’ INP 12’ INP 12’ INP VAR SHLD INP 10’ SHLD12’ AUX10’ SHLD12’ AUX11’ INP11’ INP11’ INP11’ INP11’ INP11’ INP10’ SHLD11’INP11’INP11’INP11’INP11’INP10’SHLD11’INP11’INP11’INP11’INP11’INP11’INPLEGEND10’SHLD10’SHLD10’SHLD12’ X 880’ ACCEL10’ SHLD11’INP11’INP11’INP10’ SHLD11’ INP11’ INP11’ INP11’ INP11’ INP11’ INP12’ AUX12’ AUX10’ SHLD8’ SHLD14’9’9’14’15’15’12’12’12’12’16’15’15’12’ INP11’ INP11’ INP12’ INP12’ INP12’ INP10’ SHLD INP12’ AUX8’ SHLD14’14’14’ LTL14’ RTL14’12’12’ LTL12’ RTL12’ RTL12’14’14’ LTL12’12’14’ LTL12’12’14’16’14’ LTL12’14’14’12’14’12’4’ SHLD14’12’4’ SHLD14’12’16’12’14’10’ SHLD12’14’10’ SHLD12’14’14’ LTL12’12’16’12’14’10’ SHLD10’ SHLD INP11’ INP11’ INP11’ INP10’ SHLD16’16’14’12’ WALK/TRAIL12’ WALK/TRAIL12’ WALK/TRAIL12’ WALK/TRAIL12’ WALK/TRAIL11’INP11’INP11’11’(CONST. UNDER SP 2706-222)INPLACE DETENTION PONDPOSSIBLE POND LOCATIONPOSSIBLE POND LOCATIONPOSSIBLE POND LOCATIONPOSSIBLE POND LOCATIONINPLACE POND(SP2706-222)POSSIBLE PONDING LOCATIONCURB & GUTTER, RAISED ISLANDBRIDGES & RETAINING WALLSPAVED SHOULDERROADWAYLEGENDINPLACE POND(SP2706-222)POSSIBLE PONDING LOCATIONCURB & GUTTER, RAISED ISLANDBRIDGES & RETAINING WALLSPAVED SHOULDERROADWAY12’12’14’ LTL10’SHLD16’12’12’12’RTL14’LTL18’18’18’18’18’18’16’14’LTL14’ RTL14’14’16’16’16’ RTL10’SHLD16’14’16’6’SHLD20’16’14’6’ SHLD20’10’SHLD 4’SHLD14’ LTL14’ RTL12’14’6’ SHLD14’4’ SHLD10’ SHLDPOSSIBLE POND LOCATIONPOSSIBLE POND LOCATIONPOSSIBLE POND LOCATION
10 05101010290295300295300875584015207800
10785790840845 152078579055875875404550556010152025202510 58355605655705755800595 10045 50 5560556055601015201010151015202530 5101520253010 1510152025 10152010101585DATE:12/8/2010SUBJECT TO CHANGEPRELIMINARYDATE:SUBJECT TO CHANGEPRELIMINARYDATE:DATE:12/8/2010SUBJECT TO CHANGEPRELIMINARYDATE:SUBJECT TO CHANGEPRELIMINARYDATE:12/8/2010DATE:12/8/2010SUBJECT TO CHANGEPRELIMINARYDATE:12/8/2010SUBJECT TO CHANGEPRELIMINARYSUBJECT TO CHANGEPRELIMINARY12/8/201012/8/2010SUBJECT TO CHANGEPRELIMINARY12/8/2010UNITED METHODIST CHURCH ALDERSGATEFIRE STATION #1COAT FACTORY BURLINGTONLUGGAGE WORLDUNIVERSALCENTER OF MN4 WHEEL DRIVETHE OLIVER PRESSDOUGLAS CORP.SERVICE CO AUTOMOBILEPLUMBINGMOTZKOTOMREFRIGERATION INC. SOUTH TOWNMN CONCRETE SPECIALITIESVFWAUTO BROKERS INTEGRITYREBERS HOMESBYERLYSTARGETWALSER FORDGOODYEARAARCEE PARTY & TENT RENTALAUDIO KING WAREHOUSEMcGARVEY COFFEECITY SCAPEAPTS.NORDIC WARE DATA SOURCE HAGENYOSEMITE AVE.36TH ST. W.36TH ST. W.PARK CENTER BLVD.GOODRICH AVE.35TH ST. W.34TH ST.XENWOOD AVE. S.WEBSTER AVE. S.33RD ST.WEBSTER AVE. S.LAKE ST.MINNETONKA BLVD.ROLLER GARDENCOLONIAL TERRACESTORECONVENIENCEMARATHONLINK BROS. FLORISTMINI MALLGROVES ACADEMYMINNETONKA TERRACEHOLIDAYUTICA AVE. S.VERNON AVE. S.29TH ST. W.28TH ST. W.28TH ST. W.27TH ST. W.VERNON AVE. S.UTICA AVE. S.THE REFORMATIONLUTHERAN CHURCH OFTHE COURTYARD APTS.PARK RIDGE APTS.UTICA AVE. S.STEPHENS DR.WIN STEHENS JEEP BUICK DEALERSHIPUSED CARSWIN STEPHENS BUICKEAST FRONTAGE RD.BENILDE ST. MARGARETBENILDE ST. MARGARET SCHOOLBENILDE ST. MARGARET SCHOOLBETHEL SYNAGOGUEPARKWOOD RD.25 ST. W.26TH ST. W. RALIEGH AVE. S.TOLEDO AVE. S.27TH ST. W.28TH ST. W.TOLEDO AVE. S.SALEM AVE. S.29TH ST. W.MINNETONKA BLVD.ST. GEORGES CHURCHAUTOMATIVEDUNRITETOLEDO AVE. S.31ST ST. W.SALEM AVE. S.& UNDERGROUND GARAGEBRITTANY APARTMENTS RALIEGH AVE. S.QUENTIN AVE. S.PRINCETON AVE. S.PRINCETON AVE. S.27TH ST. W.28TH ST. W.26TH ST. W.OTTAWA AVE. S.OTTAWA PL.OTTAWA AVE. S.BELTLINE BLVD.PARK GLEN RD.RALEIGH AVE. S.CENTER BLVD.WOODDA LE AVE.XENWOOD AVE. S.35 1/2 ST.WEBSTER AVE. S.XENWOOD AVE. S.26TH ST. W.26TH ST. W.25 1/2 ST.336033563352334833693361335533493343334133693337335033443340314831403130562356195601312131293133314131473153315731613205321132173225323132353241326532735530295329455524550029482944293429302918291029572955292529192913290729012851284528412835283128012785277727732769276527572753274927452737273327292725271727132709270126552651264726452643264126312600260426102616262026242700270827122716272027242728273227382742275027582764276827722780278828002804280828162824283228402848285629002910291829263148314431383132312831113101304730453033302930215227522352195209520752033044304830523100310831123116312031493145314131353131312531173109310531013057305530453035303130253021301329392933292529212917291329092901285528512847283528312829281928152801275127472743273527252715270927052701265726492645263526252600260826122616262026242632263626442648265627002704270827122716272427282736274027442750510851122937293329292925291929152907290129162920292429302936UTICA AVE. S.36TH AVE SMN TH 7CSAH 25CSAH 5CSAH 5MN TH 100to solicit input from the affected units.A public involvement process will then take placewill be proposed as part the proposed project.Noise barriers found to be feasible and reasonable part of the required environmental process.A detailed Noise Analysis will be performed asCONCEPT C 10-30-2010TH100 SP 2734-3378579079580080581081582082583083584084585085586086587087578579078579012’ INP12’ INP12’ INPINP ACCELVAR SHLD INP12’ AUX12’ INP 12’ INP 12’ INP VAR SHLD INP 10’ SHLD12’ AUX10’ SHLD10’SHLD12’ AUX11’ INP11’ INP11’ INP11’ INP11’ INP11’ INP10’ SHLD11’INP11’INP11’INP11’INP11’INP10’SHLD11’INP11’INP11’INP11’INP11’INP11’INPLEGEND10’SHLD12’X 580’ ACCEL10’SHLD10’SHLD12’ X 880’ ACCEL10’ SHLD10’ SHLD11’INP11’INP11’INP10’ SHLD11’ INP11’ INP11’ INP11’ INP11’ INP11’ INP12’ AUX12’ AUX10’ SHLD8’ SHLD14’9’9’14’16’16’14’14’15’15’12’12’12’12’16’15’15’12’ INP11’ INP11’ INP12’ INP12’ INP12’ INP10’ SHLD INP12’ AUX8’ SHLD14’14’14’ LTL14’ RTL14’12’12’ LTL12’ RTL12’ RTL12’14’14’ LTL12’12’14’ LTL12’14’14’16’14’ LTL12’14’16’16’14’12’14’12’4’ SHLD4’ SHLD14’ RTL12’12’14 LTL14’12’4’ SHLD14’14’14’10’ SHLD 14’12’4’ SHLD16’12’14’10’ SHLD12’14’16’16’16’8’ SHLD21.8’ MIN 17’17’22’10’ SHLD14’14’16’10’ SHLD12’14’14’ LTL12’12’16’12’14’10’ SHLD10’ SHLD INP19’ MIN22’11’ INP11’ INP11’ INP10’ SHLD16’16’16’16’16’14’16’10’10’10’10’16’12’ WALK/TRAIL12’ WALK/TRAIL12’ WALK/TRAIL12’ WALK/TRAIL12’ WALK/TRAIL12’ WALK/TRAIL11’INP11’INP11’11’(CONST. UNDER SP 2706-222)INPLACE DETENTION PONDPOSSIBLE POND LOCATIONPOSSIBLE POND LOCATIONPOSSIBLE POND LOCATIONPOSSIBLE POND LOCATIONPOSSIBLE POND LOCATIONPOSSIBLE POND LOCATIONPOSSIBLE POND LOCATIONINPLACE POND(SP2706-222)POSSIBLE PONDING LOCATIONCURB & GUTTER, RAISED ISLANDBRIDGES & RETAINING WALLSPAVED SHOULDERROADWAYLEGENDINPLACE POND(SP2706-222)POSSIBLE PONDING LOCATIONCURB & GUTTER, RAISED ISLANDBRIDGES & RETAINING WALLSPAVED SHOULDERROADWAY
Criteria2005LineDescriptionABCD20061 System Movement AccommodationHighLowMediumMedium MediumMedium (TH 100 to TH 7/CSAH 25)Local Access to TH 100:2 Full Access at TH 100 / TH 7 / CSAH 25YesYesYesYesYesYes3 NB 100 exit to CSAH 5Yes Thru TH 7 int.Thru TH 7 int.Thru TH 7 int. Thru TH 7 int.Yes4 CSAH 5 entrance to NB 100YesYesYesYesYesYes5 SB 100 exit to CSAH 5YesYesYesYesYesYes6 CSAH 5 entrance to SB 100YesYes Indirect - use east side 2-way Frontage Rd Yes (braid) Yes (braid)Yes (braid)7 NB 100 exit to 25-1/2 St.YesYesYesYesYesYes (braid)8 NB 100 exit to 26th St.YesYesYesYesYesYes (braid)9 NB 100 exit to Cedar Lake RoadYesYesYesYesYesYes (braid)10 W27th St entrance to SB 100YesYesPending (likely closed)Closed Closed Pending (likely closed)Local Movement Accommodation: Frontage Roads:11 Mtka south on west side1 way (SB) 1 way (SB)2 way1 way (SB) 1 way (SB)1 way (SB)12 Mtka south on east sideNoNo2 way1 way (NB) 1 way (NB)1 way (NB)13 Mtka north on west sideNoNo2 way2 way2 way2 way14 Mtka north on east side1 way (NB) 1 way (NB)NoNoNo1 way (NB)15 Local Access to Hwy 7 (Mtka Blvd connection to Hwy 7)1 way (SB) 1 way (SB) Use east side 2-way Frontage RdNoNoNo16 Auxiliary LanesNoNoPartialPartial PartialNo17 C/D RoadsNoNoNoNoNoYes18 Parallel Relievers (City Collectors)NoNoNoNoNoNoLocal Issues:19 Accomodation of Pedestrian / Bike Traffic on CSAH 5LowHighHighHigh Medium??High20 Accomodation of N-S Bike Trail from SW Corridor to W. 25-1/2 St. LowLowLowLowLowHigh21 Ability To Manage Increased Traffic Volumes From FutureLowLow????HighHigh (Re)Development Opportunities22 Ability to accomodate W. 36th St. Interchange ReconstructionYesYesYesYesYesYes23 Ability to Minimize Construction Cost / Constructability / StagingNAHighHighMedium MediumLow24 Commercial ImpactsNALowLowLowLowMedium24 Right of Way ImpactsNALowLowLowLowVery High26 Geometric FeasibilityNALowMediumHighHighHigh27 Traffic WeavingHighHighMediumMedium MediumLow28 Comparative CostsNALowMediumMedium MediumHigh29 Signing Issues / Driver ComplexityLowLowHighMedium HighLowTransit Access From SW Corridor:30 Direct Access To SW CorridorNoNo????????31 General Access to SW CorridorBeltline and WooddaleBeltline and WooddaleBeltline and WooddaleBeltline and WooddaleBeltline and WooddaleBeltline and Wooddale32Mn/DOT Concept RankNA4123NA(TH 7 HAS 2 SIGNALS @ TH 100 INTERCHANGE)Interchange Concepts Comparison Matrix - 2011S.P. 2734-33 (T.H. 100) Cedar Lake Road to West 36th St. in St. Louis Park07-Feb-11Interchange OptionsO:\CITYWIDE\PREPARE\02-11 February 2011 CC, SS, EDA\020711 CC, SSS\SSS\Hwy 100\SLP Concepts Evaluation - 02.07.11.xls02.07.201102/03/2011Special Study Session Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 3) Subject: Highway 100 Project UpdatePage 5
SLP Hwy 100 Design Criteria.doc 02/03/2011
TH 100 Reconstruction
W. 36th Street to Cedar Lake Road
(March 16, 2010)
Project Development / Design Considerations / Performance Measures
The following criteria need to be considered and evaluated in the design of the TH 100
reconstruction project from Cedar Lake Road to 36th Street within the city of St. Louis Park.
These criteria attempt to identify interests needing to be considered to address mobility, safety,
cost, access, transit, environmental concerns, regional policies, local issues, and aesthetics in
developing this project. Besides accommodating regional transportation needs, expectations are
that identified local issues are either minimized or eliminated in conjunction with this project
along with providing for future opportunities and enhancements within our community. Finally,
this will require an open and transparent project development process involving the various
project stakeholders and the public so relevant input can be obtained and considered.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
System Connections: it will be necessary to provide system-to-system connections to TH 100 to
accommodate the heavy movements between TH7/CSAH 25 and CSAH 5 to TH 100.
Local Connections to TH 100: it will be necessary to provide sufficient local-to-system connections
(access) to TH 100 to allow for future redevelopment and regional infill needs.
Local Movements: local system traffic will need to be accommodated by one or more of the following
options:
1. Frontage Roads - to distribute and collect traffic between local streets and the freeway
interchanges
2. C/D Roads (collector-distributor) - to connect exit and entrance ramps to provide single exits and
entrances from the mainline
3. Auxiliary Lanes - to accommodate lane balancing, capacity, and weaving of entering/exiting
vehicles
4. Parallel Relievers - local city collectors parallel to TH 100 providing for local short and mid-
length trips
5. Underpass Roads – local city streets under TH 100 providing relevant community connectivity
Local Issues: may be existing issues, new issues associated with the proposed project, and future
redevelopment and residential needs in our community all of which could be but may not necessarily
be part of the reconstruction project itself.
W. 36th Street Interchange Reconstruction: TH 100 reconstruction should not preclude reconstruction
of the W36th Street interchange which may be necessary at a future date.
Safety: safety must not be sacrificed at the expense of current budgetary problems.
1. horizontal/vertical alignments must meet design/safety guidelines for the intended function of the
roadways in order to safely and efficiently handle anticipated traffic flows
2. intersection crash rates currently exceed norms and these will need to be reduced to acceptable
levels
3. access management improvements are expected with this project
4. overall safety on local roads is expected to improve due to this project
5. significant weaving movements within short distances are not safe and should be avoided
Special Study Session Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 3)
Subject: Highway 100 Project Update Page 6
SLP Hwy 100 Design Criteria.doc 02/03/2011
6. traffic signing should allow for logical driver interpretation and timely reaction to minimize
confusion and safety issues
Capacity: capacity issues must not be sacrificed at the expense of current budgetary problems.
1. Level of Service D (or better) for 20 year traffic projections will be required for this project
2. long traffic queues and intersection delays must be reduced to reasonable lengths and times, not
only now, but into the future
Complete streets: access to and use of county and local streets should be intuitive, reasonable, and
multi-use. Complete Street policies and practices will need to be addressed in conjunction with area
pedestrian, bicycle, and transit needs (below).
Environment: compliance with environmental rules and regulations will be required. Waivers are no
longer acceptable and will not be supported. Identified environmental concerns to date are:
1. noise
2. air quality
3. storm water (volume and quality concerns)
Maintenance and Operations: long term maintenance needs and operational concerns must not be
sacrificed at the expense of current budgetary problems.
Costs: project costs should be considered with a long term view and holistically along the TH 100
corridor area (not a simple curb to curb fix and certainly not solely based on current budgetary problems).
Pedestrian / Bicycle / Transit Accommodations: need for compatibility with and access to current and
planned systems
1. SW Light Rail Transit (LRT) line
2. Cedar Lake LRT Regional Trail
3. North Cedar Lake LRT Regional Trail
4. Hennepin County Trails and Bikeways system
5. St. Louis Park sidewalk, bikeway, and trail system (a thru c below added Jan 2011 for
clarification):
a. Construction of N/S multi-use ped / bike trail on the east side of Hwy 100 from Mtka
Blvd north to W25½ Street.
b. Construct / improve ped and bike accommodations along Mtka Blvd. over Hwy 100.
c. Retain ped bridge over Hwy 100 @ W26th Street.
Special Study Session Meeting of February 7, 2011 (Item No. 3)
Subject: Highway 100 Project Update Page 7