HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012/06/11 - ADMIN - Agenda Packets - City Council - Study SessionAGENDA
JUNE 11, 2012
(Mayor Jacobs Out)
6:30 p.m. CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION – Council Chambers
Discussion Items
1. 6:30 p.m. Future Study Session Agenda Planning – June 18 and June 25, 2012
2. 6:35 p.m. 2013 Budget Discussion
3. 7:35 p.m. Environment/Sustainability Task Force Application Review
4. 8:05 p.m. Project Update - Highway 7 / Louisiana Avenue Interchange Project
5. 8:35 p.m. Pedestrian and Bicycle System Implementation Plan and Policy Review
6. 9:20 p.m. Communications/Meeting Check-In (Verbal)
9:25 p.m. Adjourn
Written Reports
7. 2013 – 2018 Solid Waste Collection Program
Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request.
To make arrangements, please call the Administration Department at
952/924-2525 (TDD 952/924-2518) at least 96 hours in advance of meeting.
Meeting Date: June 11, 2012
Agenda Item #: 1
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Future Study Session Agenda Planning – June 18 and June 25, 2012
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
The City Council and the City Manager to set the agenda for a Special Study Session scheduled
for June 18 and for the regularly scheduled Study Session on June 25, 2012.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Does the Council agree with the agendas as proposed?
BACKGROUND:
At each study session approximately five minutes are set aside to discuss the next study session
agenda. For this purpose, attached please find the tentative agenda and proposed discussion
items for a Special Study Session scheduled for June 18 and for the regularly scheduled Study
Session on June 25, 2012.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
None.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
None.
Attachment: Future Study Session Agenda Planning – June 18 and June 25, 2012
Prepared by: Debbie Fischer, Office Assistant
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
Study Session Meeting of June 11, 2012 (Item No. 1) Page 2
Subject: Future Study Session Agenda Planning – June 18 and June 25, 2012
Special City Council Meeting, June 18, 2012 – 6:30 p.m.
Tentative Discussion Item
1. 2011 Audit – Administrative Services (50 minutes)
Review results of the 2010 Audit with the City’s auditor.
(Special City Council Meeting cont. – immediately following City Council Meeting)
2. Storm Water Follow-Up – Bass Lake Improvements – Public Works (45 minutes)
Discussion to provide Council with information regarding possible improvements to Bass
Lake.
Study Session, June 25, 2012 – 6:30 p.m.
Tentative Discussion Items
1. Future Study Session Agenda Planning – Administrative Services (5 minutes)
2. Community Recreation Task Force – Parks & Recreation (45 minutes)
Members of the Community Recreation Task Force along with staff will present an update of
what the Task Force has accomplished to date.
3. PRAC 2011 Annual Report & 2012 Work Plan w/ Commission – Parks & Rec (30 minutes)
As requested by Council, the Parks & Recreation Advisory Commissioners will be present to
discuss their Annual Report and Work Plan with Council.
4. Brewery Taproom Ordinance – Community Development/Administrative Svcs (20 minutes)
As directed by Council, staff will provide Council with proposed ordinance amendments
necessary to allow brewery taprooms in St. Louis Park.
5. Administrative Penalties – Community Development (15 minutes)
Review draft ordinance and timeline for implementing the administrative penalties
procedures.
6. Police Department Annual Report – Police (45 minutes)
Staff from the St. Louis Park Police Department will be in attendance to present and discuss
with the City Council the activities involved in 2011 service delivery. Staff members will
detail some of the highlights, trends, challenges and strategies related to 2011 activity.
7. Communications/Meeting Check-In – Administrative Services (5 minutes)
Time for communications between staff and Council will be set aside on every study session
agenda for the purposes of information sharing.
Reports
8. May 2012 Financial Report
End of Meeting: 9:15 p.m.
Meeting Date: June 11, 2012
Agenda Item #: 2
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
2013 Budget Discussion
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
No formal action required. This report is to assist with the Study Session discussion to share
information and gain understanding regarding the preparation of the 2013 budget and planning
the upcoming discussions.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
• Does the 2013 budget process and timeline meet Council expectations?
• Is the general direction outlined for 2013 budget recommendations in line with Council
expectations?
• Is there other information that Council would like to review in more detail in the
upcoming process?
• Are there any other service delivery changes Council would like to have considered?
• Are there other discussion areas Council would like to add or change?
BACKGROUND:
Staff is working on preparing budget recommendations for 2013. During the Study Session, staff
will provide an overview of budget related information including:
• 2013 Budget Production Guidelines
• 2011 – 2013 Budget Analysis Snapshot
• 2013 – 2017 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) – distributed at the meeting
• Long Range Financial Management Plan (LRFMP) – distributed at the meeting
• 2013 Budget Calendar
These documents are used by staff to begin budget preparation. Based on Council direction at
this meeting, information and direction can be modified as needed to meet expectations.
2013 Budget Preparation: In upcoming sessions, the City Council will be provided with more
detail on budget recommendations, with time allowed for review of materials and questions.
Directors will also be present for questions or sharing information as needed or requested. All
budgets, CIP, LRFMP, fee schedules, and relevant information will be included in future
materials.
Staffing Costs: Funds for staffing are the largest expenditure of the City’s operating budget. In
building the 2013 budget recommendations, a wage adjustment of 2% is being used as an
assumption. In addition, a wellness benefit was approved in 2012 for 2013 of $35 per employee
per month for those that participate in the program (this is an increase of $10 from 2012). Also,
a general employer benefit contribution increase of $20 per month is included in the projection.
As a reminder, there was no increase to the general employer benefit contribution in 2012 and
we anticipate up to a 9% increase in rates for 2013. This proposed increase for wages and
benefits is shown in the budget analysis snapshot.
Study Session Meeting of June 11, 2012 (Item No. 2) Page 2
Subject: 2013 Budget Discussion
Operational Costs: A fairly flat budgeting plan is being projected as it relates to general
operations, supplies, materials, etc. Energy costs will continue to be examined closely as it
relates to the MSC and now with our two newly built Fire Stations.
Program Support:
• Environmental Programs: With the interest Council has in environment and sustainability,
we anticipate additional funds needed for staff work to handle programs. We plan to set
aside some additional funding to support programs and initiatives. Funding for these
types of programs will come from the solid waste fund (non-general fund).
• Community Survey: We will also discuss the possibility of conducting a community
survey late in 2013 or fall of 2014. As in the past, we find it helpful to formally check in
with our residents to get an ongoing gage of our community and this tool allows us to do
some comparisons with other cities. In 2011, we spent $21,000 on this survey from the
development fund.
Utility Funds: All utility funds will be presented during the process as in previous years with
review of rates in accordance with our long range plans.
Franchise Fees: Staff is working on the policy direction from Council on an increase of $.50 to
$.75 per month in both Xcel and Center Point franchise fees for 2013.
Fees, Charges and Other Revenues: Staff will review current fee data based on cost analyses
and complete a review of comparable cities before making recommendations for the 2013 Fee
Schedules.
LRFMP: This document will be distributed at this meeting. Accounting staff will briefly go
through this document to make sure we all understand what it covers. The LRFMP is a
document that is updated on a regular basis based on policy direction and we will bring new
iterations back to Council as we move through the 2013 budget process.
It is important to note that two areas not included in this LRFMP are:
• Trails and sidewalks funding.
• Any funds for another community recreational facility or cooperative initiative.
Cable TV Transfers: The Budget Analysis Snapshot and LRFMP include a $25,000 reduction
to the Cable TV transfer to the General Fund. Reducing this transfer by $25,000 per year will
get the Cable TV Fund closer to financial stability.
CIP: Staff has completed preliminary work on the CIP. Materials will be handed out at this
meeting. As with the LRFMP, Accounting will briefly go through this document and bring it
back to Council as the budget process progresses. Hwy 7 & Louisiana is included in the CIP
with the most up to date information. There is a placeholder for trails and sidewalks with no
dollar amount. A project for a community recreation facility is not included at this time.
Levy: Based on current budget assumptions, debt service obligation, and information from the
CIP and LRFMP, Accounting is anticipating a levy increase in the 2.5-5% range. As the year
progresses and more firm information becomes available, staff will bring levy information to the
City Council. The Council will meet to adopt a preliminary 2013 levy on September 4. After
adoption of the preliminary levy, the levy may be reduced, but not increased.
Study Session Meeting of June 11, 2012 (Item No. 2) Page 3
Subject: 2013 Budget Discussion
Discussion Topics – Monday, June 11: The following is a list of information that staff would
like to discuss with the City Council on Monday night. Staff would like feedback from Council
on the information provided. This feedback will be incorporated into the work on budgets, CIP,
LRFMP, fees, etc., for Council review in August.
1. Discuss and review 2013 Budget Projection (attached).
• Property tax levy
• Other revenues – fees, charges for services, etc.
• Staffing, wages and benefits
• Other expenditures
• Transfers
2. Council questions, comments, expectations and data requests for upcoming meetings
(including budget calendar).
3. General discussion on Capital Improvement Program and funding sources (CIP information
distributed at the meeting).
4. Discussion on the Long Range Financial Management Plan (LRFMP information
distributed at the meeting).
5. Potential range of property tax levy based on budget assumptions.
6. Communication plan and other items Council would like to discuss.
NEXT STEPS:
As the 2013 budget process continues, the following preliminary schedule snapshot has been
developed for Council:
August 13 High level 2013 budget, CIP, utility rates discussion by City Council with
City Manager, Department Directors, as needed, and Accounting in
attendance. Discussion regarding proposed preliminary levy.
September 4 Council establishes 2013 preliminary property tax levies.
(Can be reduced in the future, not increased for final property tax levy.)
October 8 Review and discussion of 2013 budget, CIP, utility rates and LRFMP.
Directors present as needed.
November 13 Final budget discussion prior to Truth in Taxation public hearing.
December 3 Truth in Taxation public hearing.
December 17 Council adopts 2013 budget, final property tax levies, CIP and utility rates.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
Details provided in this report and attachments.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Vision is considered throughout the budgeting process and kept at the foreground of budgeting
decisions.
Attachments: 2013 Budget Production Guidelines
2013 Budget Analysis Snapshot
2013 Preliminary Budget Calendar
Prepared by: Steven Heintz, Finance Supervisor
Brian Swanson, Controller
Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
2013 Budget Production Guidelines
As we move ahead, please review the following assumptions when creating your budget papers for
2013.
1. Review Past Expenditures and Revenues: You’ve received information showing expenditures
and revenues from the past four years. Important note: We will be asking that if line items are
not expensed, that you use reasonable judgment to cut back and get your budget closer to actual
levels of anticipated expenditures. Line items should not be “over budgeted” to prepare for
some excessive or unexpected emergency. Over budgeting for one time emergency expenditure
possibilities only ties up funds that are needed in other operational areas. The same review
should happen if you find that you are continually under budget on an operation. Please continue
to review your operational expenses so we fund things at the appropriate business level.
2. Fees: As in the past, you will receive information on current fees and revenues. These should
be reviewed during the budget process and changes (additions, deletions, increases, etc.) should
be made to cover our costs. Please use 2% minimum as a guide for 2013 fee increase. Important
note: Do you have new services that should have fees? If so, now is the time to make that
change and add fees for 2013. Fee information will be handled by our City Clerk and will need
to be done by the budget due date.
3. Business as Usual: Continue with your high standards of service delivery and responsiveness to
customers.
4. Changes in Staffing Requests are Due July 31, 2012: Changes in staffing, including
recommendations to add, increase or decrease hours, shifts, etc., should be included in the budget
request and a detailed justification is needed. Justification must be pre-submitted to Accounting
before the budget deadline for City Manager review and include if there is a change in business
need, shift in work, mandate, enhancement, etc., to explain the reasons for your
recommendation(s). Staffing request forms should be used for regular, seasonal, temporary,
intern, volunteer and contract type positions. Please discuss estimates on salary levels and
benefits with the HR Coordinator. When making staffing requests, remember to include any
costs for equipment, tools, uniforms, etc., based on the type of work. Discuss this with the City
Manager and Controller to determine if it will be in your final budget request.
5. Changes in Programs and/or Business Operations: Provide an explanation for changes in
business operations when you are adding, deleting, modifying or updating your business
operation. This helps all of us understand why you are requesting changes in the budget.
Important note: If you have a MAJOR program change, addition or deletion, this must be pre-
submitted to Accounting before the budget deadline (by July 31, 2012) for City Manager review.
Discuss this with the City Manager and Controller to determine if it will be in your final budget
request.
6. Vision: As always, keep Vision in consideration during budget and long range planning.
Study Session Meeting of June 11, 2012 (Item No. 2)
Subject: 2013 Budget Discussion Page 4
CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK
BUDGET ANALYSIS SNAPSHOT
FOR YEARS 2011 - 2013
2011 2012 2013
Final Budget Adopted Projected
General Fund Revenues:
Property Taxes 16,093,611 15,998,293 15,998,293
MVHC Loss (667,539) - -
All Other Revenues 7,857,715 7,394,083 7,318,592
Total General Revenues 23,283,787$ 23,392,376$ 23,316,885$
General Fund Expenditures:
General Government:
Total Admininstration/Human Resources/Legislative 1,542,568$ 1,680,166$ 1,680,166$
Total Communications 294,470$ 265,426$ 265,426$
Total Community Outreach 88,515$ 8,185$ 8,185$
Total Information Resources 1,394,226$ 1,507,579$ 1,507,579$
Total Accounting 612,965$ 641,692$ 641,692$
Total Assessing 500,141$ 517,840$ 517,840$
Total Community Development 1,094,186$ 1,076,376$ 1,076,376$
Total Facilities Maintenance 1,114,550$ 1,083,128$ 1,083,128$
Total General Government 6,641,621$ 6,780,392$ 6,780,392$
Public Safety:
Total Police 7,208,512$ 7,273,723$ 7,273,723$
Total Fire 3,164,344$ 3,346,931$ 3,346,931$
Total Inspectional Services 1,863,296$ 1,889,340$ 1,889,340$
Total Public Safety 12,236,152$ 12,509,994$ 12,509,994$
Public Works:
Total Public Works Administration 829,698$ 389,783$ 389,783$
Total Engineering 846,031$ 927,337$ 927,337$
Total Operations 2,550,285$ 2,604,870$ 2,604,870$
Total Public Works 4,226,014$ 3,921,990$ 3,921,990$
Total Non-Departmental 180,000$ 180,000$ 180,000$
Total General Fund Expenditures 23,283,787$ 23,392,376$ 23,392,376$
General Fund Gap -$ -$ (75,491)$
Park & Recreation Revenues:
Property Taxes 4,000,561$ 4,171,506$ 4,171,506$
Subtotal: All Other Revenues 2,131,902 2,156,302 2,156,302
Total Park & Recreation Revenues 6,132,463$ 6,327,808$ 6,327,808$
Park & Recreation Expenditures:
Total Organized Recreation 1,239,230$ 1,305,747$ 1,305,747$
Total Recreation Center 1,442,447$ 1,466,246$ 1,466,246$
Total Park Maintenance 1,435,374$ 1,461,645$ 1,461,645$
Total Westwood Nature Center 502,366$ 515,456$ 515,456$
Total Environment 371,325$ 390,009$ 390,009$
Total Vehicle Maintenance 1,141,721$ 1,188,705$ 1,188,705$
Total Park & Recreation Expenditures 6,132,463$ 6,327,808$ 6,327,808$
Park & Recreation Gap -$ -$ -$
Total Gap General and P&R Before Adjustments:-$ -$ (75,491)$
Proposed Property Tax Levy Adjustment:-$ -$ -$
Proposed Benefit Contribution Increases - $30/month - General and P&R Impact:- 77,090
Salary adjustments:- 437,384
Projected Total Budget Gap for Gen. and Park and Rec. Funds:-$ -$ (589,965)$
2013 ASSUMPTIONS:
Assumes 2% salary and step increases for all employees.
Benefit Increases- $30/month ($20/month Employer, $10/month Wellness)
No use of fund balance in 2013.
No increase in non-personnel expenditures.
Continued unwinding of Police and Fire Pension Transfer of $50,000 per year
Beginning of unwinding of Cable TV Transfer of $25,000 per year
Transfers agree to LRFMP
$25k reduction in Investment Income
Community Survey included in Development Fund LRFMP
No additonal expenditures for environmental programs (funded from Solid Waste)
Study Session Meeting of June 11, 2012 (Item No. 2)
Subject:2013 Budget Discussion Page 5
City of St. Louis Park
2013 Budget Calendar
Date Department(s) Description
March 30, 2012 All 2013–2017 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is available for update.
May 18, 2012 @ 4:30 pm All Capital Improvement Plan access restricted by Acctg. to Read-Only
June 11 CM/Admin/Acctg. Study Session with Council to discuss 2013 Budget and assumptions.
June 19 @ 11am-noon All
City Manager, Dep. CM and Controller meet with Departments to
discuss any significant changes in business or staffing.
July 16 @ 4:30 pm All
All 2013 Budget worksheets available on O:\Budget or Insight to all
departments. This includes all Governmental, Special Revenue and
Proprietary Funds. All revenues and expenditures are to be budgeted
including review of fee schedule and Utility Rate Analyses.
July 23–Aug 3 @ 4:30pm All 1st Review/Edit of 2013 – 2017 CIP by Departments
July 31 @ 4:30pm All
Forms for changes in staffing requests and major changes in programs
due to Accounting.
August 1 @ 4:30 pm Inspections Building revenue projections due to Accounting
August 13
City Manager,
Dept. Directors and
Accounting
High level 2013 Budget, CIP, Utility Rates discussion by City
Council, with City Manager, Department Directors and Accounting in
attendance. More of a proposed levy discussion.
August 31 @ 4:30 pm All 2013 Proposed Budget worksheets due and access to Read-Only by IR.
September 4 (Tuesday) C.M./Accounting Preliminary 2013 Budget and Property Tax Levy approval by Council
September 10 - 18 Each Department Individual review of budgets – CM, Dep. CM, Director, and Acctg.
By September 15 Accounting
Certification of 2013 Preliminary Property Tax Levy due to Hennepin
County and levy reports due to State of Minnesota
October 1 – 10 All 2nd and Final Review/Edit of 2013 – 2017 CIP by Departments
October 8
City Manager,
Dept. Directors and
Accounting
Review and discussion of 2013 Budget, CIP, Utility Rates and
LRFMP review and discussion by City Council, with City Manager,
Department Directors and Accounting in attendance.
October 9 – Oct. 31 All
Final review of all 2013 revenues and expenditures for all funds. In
addition, review of the CIP, Utility Rates and LRFMP.
October 31 @ 4:30 pm All Final changes submitted to City Manager/Deputy C.M and Controller
November 13 (Tuesday) CM/Admin/Acctg. Final Budget Discussion with City Council prior to TNT hearing
December 3, 2012 Accounting Truth in Taxation Public Hearing and Budget Presentation
December 10 (if needed) C.M./Accounting Council discussion of any 2013 Budget related items (if necessary)
December 17, 2012 C.M./Accounting
Final 2013 Budget and Property Tax Levy, 2013 Utility Rates, fee
schedules and 2013 – 2017 CIP approved by Council. In addition, the
LRFMP is provided as a report only???
By December 21, 2012 Accounting Certification of tax levy and other required forms – Due 12-28-12
January, 2013 Accounting Budget Summary Report to OSA due 1/31/2013.
Note: Items in blue are meetings with the City Council
Study Session Meeting of June 11, 2012 (Item No. 2)
Subject: 2013 Budget Discussion Page 6
Meeting Date: June 11, 2012
Agenda Item #: 3
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Environment/Sustainability Task Force Application Review
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Council to review Environment/Sustainability Task Force applications and identify 8 to 15
members to be appointed.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Does Council need any other information prior to selection of 8 to 15 persons to serve on the
Environment/Sustainability Task Force?
BACKGROUND:
On March 26, 2012, the City Council discussed public involvement in the City’s environmental
policies and initiatives. The discussion centered on “what is missing” in the environmental area?
This issue was a topic of discussion going back to 2007 and 2008 as part of the Strategic
Direction the City Council adopted related to the environment. Specifically, the City Council
identified the need to investigate “the need and purpose of an energy and environmental
commission”. Below is information regarding past Council discussions on this topic:
• February 25, 2008 - Study Session: Discussed Strategic Direction related to the
environment and the need for an energy/environmental commission.
• September 13, 2010 - Study Session: Environmental Activities Update.
• November 8, 2010 - Study Session: Process for Community Input on Environment.
• March 26, 2012 - Study Session: Environmental Input Discussion. Review of outline for
a time limited task force to define the approach for public input into the City’s
environmental/sustainability policies and initiatives.
• April 23, 2012 - Study Session: Environmental Input Task Force discussion and review
of application process, information and timelines.
• May 29, 2012: Report to Council regarding the progress with the application process
and next steps set for June 11. Due to lower number of applications at the time of writing
the report, Council was informed the application deadline was extended to June 4.
Applications: The application process was open from April 30 and extended through June 4,
2012. We received 25 applications from the following individuals:
Kandi Arries Tom Hillstrom Carol Nulsen Eric Schultz
Timothy Brausen Matt Hoenck Steven Parsons Brian Shekleton
Judy C hucker Mark Hutchinson Rick Person Kelly Spors
Andrew Emanuele Cookie Kulas Amy Peterson Paul Zeigle
Lisa Genis Gregg Lindberg Russell Redman
Terry Gips Ellen Lipschultz Nancy Rose
Jennifer Glidden Susan Melbye Carol Schaub
Study Session Meeting of June 11, 2012 (Item No. 3) Page 2
Subject: Environment/Sustainability Task Force Application Review
Attached is a map of the location of each applicant in the City. Paper copies of their
applications will be delivered separately.
Next Steps: Review and selection of 8 to 15 members for the task force in accordance with the
guidelines set by Council in past discussions. Once members are selected, they will be notified
and an orientation meeting will be set along with the guidelines for the limited duration task
force.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
None at this time.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
“St Louis Park is committed to being a leader in environmental stewardship. We will increase
environmental consciousness and responsibility in all areas of City business.”
Attachments: Environment/Sustainability Task Force Application Info. – 4/30/12
Minutes from March 26, 2012 on Environment/Sustainability Task Force
Minutes from April 23, 2012 on Environment/Sustainability Task Force
Map of Environment/Sustainability Task Force Applicant Locations
Environment/Sustainability Task Force Applications (delivered separately)
Prepared by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager, City Manager
Study Session Meeting of June 11, 2012 (Item No. 3) Page 3
Subject: Environment/Sustainability Task Force Application Review
Environment/Sustainability Task Force
4/30/12
The St. Louis Park City Council is accepting applications from residents to serve on an
Environment/Sustainability Task Force to make recommendations on the approach the City
should use to allow for public input into the City’s environmental/sustainability policies,
programs and initiatives. The task force would be made up of 8 – 15 residents to volunteer their
time and represent various geographic areas of the City. Applicants for the task force will be
asked to provide information on their education, experience, activities, interests and work in the
area of the environment/sustainability. Applicants will also be asked to describe 3 – 5 main
concerns/ideas/activities related to the environment/sustainability that are of most interest to
them.
Council will review applications and appoint residents to this task force on June 11, 2012 (or
other date as determined). Meetings are expected to be scheduled starting in June. The meeting
schedule will be determined by staff and task force members. This task force will serve in a
voluntary capacity with no compensation and for a limited duration. Recommendations from
the task force are to be developed no later than December 31, 2012. Once the recommendations
are completed, the work of the task force will end.
Applications will be open starting April 30 through June 4, 2012 and can be completed on line at
www.stlouispark.org
Questions on this should be directed to Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director at
952.924.2519 or ndeno@stlouispark.org
Scope of the Volunteer Environment/Sustainability Task Force is as follows:
Purpose: To assist the City Council by recommending the approach the City should use to allow
for public input into the City’s environmental/sustainability policies, programs and initiatives.
The task force would meet for a limited duration and make recommendation(s) to the City
Council no later than December 31, 2012.
Task force would meet and undertake the following activities:
1. Review background and current information on environmental and sustainability
activities, programs, staffing and overall scope of work in all departments of the city
and regulatory agencies.
2. Brainstorm ideas on possibilities and look into “what’s missing” regarding public input
into sustainability/environmental policies, programs and initiatives of the City.
3. Review other opportunities that could offer resident interaction about environmental
issues (including and not limited to: on line forums, create a “friends of the
environment”, add to existing City commission or create a new commission, connect
residents through on line methods, etc.).
4. Sift through ideas and begin to prioritize the ideas, and develop
options/recommendations.
5. Formalize recommendation to the City Council.
Study Session Meeting of June 11, 2012 (Item No. 3) Page 4
Subject: Environment/Sustainability Task Force Application Review
Guiding Principles:
• The task force will meet as needed to go through the process stated above and develop
recommendation(s) for City Council no later than December 2012.
• The task force will end after it has finalized/ presented its recommendations.
• City Council has the final decision on what the next steps should be and may select
all, some or none of the task force recommendations.
• If a new “group” or commission is formed, it will be open to residents from across the
city who will apply (if task force members want to be on the new “group” or
commission, they will receive the same consideration as the rest of the applicants).
How does this begin/Timeline?
• Applications from residents to serve on task force open April 30 – June 4.
• Council receives applications on June 11, 2012.
• Council selects members.
• Start meetings in June, and process completed no later than December 2012.
• Bridget Gothberg, Organizational Development Coordinator with the City, will
facilitate the task force.
• Other City staff will be present to provide information as needed.
• Task Force membership will have a size limitation between 8 – 15 people maximum.
Study Session Meeting of June 11, 2012 (Item No. 3) Page 5
Subject: Environment/Sustainability Task Force Application Review
Minutes from March 26, 2012
1. Environmental Input Discussion
Ms. Deno presented the staff report. She referenced the background information contained in the
staff report, including historical information regarding the formation of the Police Advisory
Commission.
Councilmember Mavity thanked City staff for the extensive background information included in
the report. She suggested the concept where the City could form a resident task force for a
limited time, e.g., five meetings. She suggested the first meeting provide background
information and be used as an educational meeting to make sure everyone is on the same page;
the second meeting could be a brainstorming session; the third meeting could be used to sift
through ideas from the brainstorming session and begin to prioritize the ideas; the fourth meeting
could be used to discuss various options and discuss whether to form a commission; and the final
meeting could be used for making a final recommendation to the City.
Councilmember Hallfin acknowledged the City’s desire to remain sensitive to the other boards
and commissions and stated he did not believe the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission
would feel that an environmental task force would be doing similar work to the work of the
Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission. He stated he was in agreement with
Councilmember Mavity’s concept for forming a task force.
Councilmember Ross stated she was in agreement with Councilmember Mavity’s concept for
forming a task force and felt it was a good starting point. She indicated there is a lot that can be
done in this community around education, getting new ideas, keeping an eye on what other
communities are doing, and trends and shifts outside the City. She stated it will also be
important to think about how the City works with other groups, e.g., the Watershed Districts, and
to look at what other people are doing creatively to control air and ground pollution, as well as
working with refuse providers around recycling issues. She added it would be nice if the City
had a group that could serve as the City’s content experts and that could tie all the other
commissions together as well.
Mayor Pro Tem Sanger recognized that staff has already done a lot of good work on
environmental issues and this discussion should not be interpreted as a put down of staff. She
stated that environmental stewardship is one of the four main Vision goals for the community
and the City needs to have a board or some equivalent mechanism whose main focus is
environmental issues. She agreed with the framework of Councilmember Mavity’s concept and
suggested that the task force be charged with defining the mission and goals of a new board or
some equivalent mechanism. She added that the mission could include advising Council on new
areas or issues that are emerging related to the environment.
Mr. Harmening requested clarification regarding Councilmember Mavity’s concept and stated
that under Councilmember Mavity’s approach, the task force would be asked to define the
approach the City should take for public input into the City’s environmental policies and
initiatives. He indicated the task force could then go through the five meeting process to help
define what is missing. If Council wants to move directly to a commission, that should be stated
in these meetings up front. He stated it appears that Council wants more of the open ended
question on what type of environmental input is recommended for our community.
Study Session Meeting of June 11, 2012 (Item No. 3) Page 6
Subject: Environment/Sustainability Task Force Application Review
Councilmember Ross agreed with the concept of formation of a new environmental commission
with Council setting the framework for what that commission looks like, outlining its goals, and
defining how the commission can assist the City in meeting its Vision, and leaving this open to
the task force to recommend.
Councilmember Mavity stated there might be other venues available that could offer resident
interaction about environmental issues such as someone could create an online forum that could
connect residents on various issues, e.g., community gardens. She indicated the task force could
then address issues more appropriate for the entire community related to the environment. She
supported the City asking residents to sign up for a time-limited task force that may result in the
formation of a new commission or that may result in other recommendations for residents related
to the environment.
Mayor Pro Tem Sanger felt the resulting work of the time-limited task force may result in the
formation of a new commission and/or other recommendations. Councilmember Mavity
requested the names of the people on the environmental Vision team.
Ms. Gothberg suggested that the task force be composed of 8-15 people.
Ms. Deno asked if Council wants to select the members of the task force.
Mayor Pro Tem Sanger replied in the affirmative.
Mr. Harmening stated that staff will prepare a proposal for Council consideration prior to
soliciting task force members. He added the proposal will be on the agenda in April.
Study Session Meeting of June 11, 2012 (Item No. 3) Page 7
Subject: Environment/Sustainability Task Force Application Review
Minutes from April 23, 2012
Environment/Sustainability Input
Ms. Deno presented the staff report and proposed outline for establishing the environment/
sustainability task force. She explained the purpose of the task force, timeline for meeting, and
guiding principles.
Councilmember Sanger felt that five meetings may not be enough and the timeline may be too
short. She suggested that the guiding principles provide more flexibility to allow more if
necessary and to allow the task force to decide if they need more time to complete their work.
Ms. Deno agreed to revise the timeline for completing the task force’s work.
Mr. Harmening suggested that the City advertise the task force formation and ask interested
residents to complete an application and then Council can review the applications to make
appointments to the task force.
Councilmember Santa stated it will be important to have a balanced membership with
representation from all areas of the City as well as certain geographic anomalies, e.g., residents
living near Minnehaha Creek.
Councilmember Mavity requested that the application form include applicants to list their top
three to five environmental issues, ideas or areas of interest.
Councilmember Sanger suggested that the application form ask applicants to give an indication
of what environmental areas they have been involved with in the past.
Councilmember Mavity stated that Council has previously discussed having some kind of
mechanism on the City’s website to provide a forum for residents to provide input and share
information on environmental issues. She indicated this information could be helpful to the task
force in understanding what residents are interested in related to environmental issues. Council
discussed this and thought it best of the task force wanted to do something like this, they could
make such recommendation to Council.
Councilmember Spano stated he does not want Council to shape the work of the task force too
much and added it will be important to make sure the task force represents a broad spectrum of
issues related to the environment.
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
HI
JK
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Environment/SustainabilityTask Force Applicants
Legend
Applicant
Ward 1
Ward 2
Ward 3
Ward 4
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
Kandi Arries
Timothy Brausen
Judy Chucker
Andrew Emanuele
Lisa Genis
Terry Gips
Jennifer Glidden
Tom Hillstrom
Matt Hoenck
Mark Hutchinson
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
Cookie Kulas
Gregg Lindberg
Ellen Lipschultz
Susan Melbye
Carol Nulsen
Steven Parsons
Rick Person
Amy Peterson
Russell Redman
Nancy Rose
U
V
W
X
Y
Carol Schaub
Eric Schultz
Brian Shekleton
Kelly Spors
Paul Zeigle
Study Session Meeting of June 11, 2012 (Item No. 3)
Subject:Environment/Sustainability Task Force Application Review Page 8
Meeting Date: June 11, 2012
Agenda Item #: 4
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Project Update - Highway 7 / Louisiana Avenue Interchange Project
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
The purpose of this report and discussion is to update the Council on recent project development
and financial activities related to this project – Project No. 2012-0100.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Staff seeks Council input on the following:
1. Does the City Council have any specific questions on the overall project, financing, etc?
2. Does the City Council have any specific questions on Right-of-Way Acquisition Activities?
3. Does the City Council wish to continue moving forward with this project?
BACKGROUND:
History
The City’s Capital Improvement Program (C.I.P.) indentifies the Highway 7/Louisiana Avenue
intersection as a priority improvement project. The proposed project, which provides for the
construction of a grade-separated interchange at Louisiana Avenue and Highway 7, also includes
pedestrian and bicycle friendly improvements along with re-configuration of the frontage roads
in order to improve access, safety, and traffic flow for both the Highway 7 corridor and
Louisiana Avenue. This proposed improvement is essential in meeting long term transportation
and safety needs of both Mn/DOT and the City as well as quality of life and redevelopment
needs in this area of the city.
Project Purpose and Need
The primary purpose of the Highway 7/Louisiana Avenue Interchange Project is to address
deteriorating safety and operational conditions at the Highway 7 and Louisiana Avenue
intersection. These deficient conditions are resulting in numerous crashes and causing high
levels of congestion. In conjunction with the proposed project, there are also opportunities to
improve pedestrian and bicycle movements across Highway 7 that are anticipated to increase
with the construction and operation of a future LRT Station along Louisiana Avenue. In
addition, the transportation improvements will help foster economic development in the area.
As listed above, the need for the project is centered on the following:
• Improve Vehicle Safety
• Maintain Mobility / Reduce Congestion / Reduce Vehicle Delays
In addition, the following were identified as opportunities to consider in development of the project:
• Improve Pedestrian/Bicycle Movements
• Environmental Improvements (reduce greenhouse gases / air pollution, stormwater
quality improvements, site clean-up activities)
• Foster Economic Development
• Improve Response Time for Emergency Vehicles
Study Session Meeting of June 11, 2012 (Item No. 4) Page 2
Subject: Project Update - Hwy 7 / Louisiana Avenue Interchange Project
Detailed information and data supporting the Project Purpose and Need is documented in the
Project’s Environmental Assessment which can be viewed here at the project’s website:
http://www.sehinc.com/files/online/LouisianaFINALEA.pdf
Phase 4 Activities (underway)
Council authorized the City’s consultant, SEH, Inc., to begin Phase 4 activities on April 4, 2011
with an expected cost of approximately $958,600. Phase 4 activities, described as Final Design
and Plan Preparation, include detailed engineering work needed to complete plans and
specifications to obtain final Mn/DOT project approvals and authorization for bidding. The
following is a list of tasks associated with this phase of the project:
• Project Management
• Public Involvement
• Survey Work
• Geotechnical Analysis
• Drainage Design
• Wetland Permitting
• Roadway Design
• Bridge Design
• Construction Staging
• Lighting
• Public Art
• Utility Coordination and Relocations
• Right of Way Acquisition
• Aesthetic Design and Landscape
Architecture
Final Design: SEH is now in the final plan preparation phase. Final plans will be ready for
Mn/DOT’s final review later in July. Mn/DOT final review and project authorization is a lengthy
process which can take as long as 2-3 months. Other work which is ongoing includes the private
utility coordination/relocation work, remedial action plan (RAP), permit application work and
contract specification writing. A copy of the project schedule is attached (Attachment 1).
Right of Way Acquisition Activities: The right of way activities which are part of the final
design are being contracted separately from the engineering work. The City’s consultant,
Evergreen Land Services, has started work on the Pre-Acquisition Activities which include the
following:
• Property Owner Introductory Letter, Questionnaire and Acquisition Brochure
• Field Title Reviews
• Appraisal Activities
• Parcel File Preparation
• Conveyance Document Preparation
• Offer Letter Preparation
Upon completion of Pre-Acquisition Activities (anticipated by mid-July), Acquisition Activities
including offers, negotiations and condemnation will need to begin to keep the project on
schedule. At or before the time that initial offers are made to the property owners, the City
Attorney recommends initiation of the condemnation process which requires Council approval of
a resolution authorizing condemnation of land for Public purposes. Approval of the resolution
will allow for condemnation by the quick take method in the event that negotiations and
subsequent acquisitions do not occur in a timely manner. The intent of staff is to first acquire the
necessary right of way through a negotiated process. Our current schedule will allow
approximately 4 to 5 months for these negotiations. Staff proposes to bring this condemnation
resolution forward for Council approval at the July 16, 2012 Council meeting.
Study Session Meeting of June 11, 2012 (Item No. 4) Page 3
Subject: Project Update - Hwy 7 / Louisiana Avenue Interchange Project
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
The following summarizes the project development phases and the costs contracted for with
SEH, Inc. to date:
Phase Contract Amount Cost to Date Status
1 & 2 $306,548.00 $296,420.77 Work Completed
3 $535,000.00 $561,231.81 Work Completed
4 $976,656.00 $786,495.06 80% Complete
Total $1,818,113.00 $1,644,147.64
Project Costs
In addition to the SEH consulting fees above, the city has incurred expenses since the
establishment of the project in 2007. These expenses are related to staff time, city attorney’s
time, and consultant fees for preparation of the original Met Council STP grant application along
with other minor miscellaneous charges resulting in total project expenditures to date of
$1,742,662.89.
Presented below are the estimated project costs based on current design work. All of the funding
sources are also presented below:
Current Estimated Project Costs
Construction $18,090,000
Preliminary and Final Design Engineering $ 1,818,000
Construction Engineering (estimated consultant cost) $ 1,800,000
Undergrounding Power Lines $ 600,000
Right of Way Acquisition Services (appraisals, title work, attorney fees) $ 100,000
Right of Way (Purchasing land and easements, condemnation costs) $ 2,600,000
Total Costs $25,008,000
Funding Sources
Federal (STP) Funds $7,630,000
Mn/DOT Access Management Funds $1,000,000
Mn/DOT Cooperative Agreement Funds $ 594,000
Mn/DOT (Construction Eng’r Value) $1,800,000
TED Grant (Mn/DOT & DEED Program) $3,000,000
City Funds (20% construction grant match – source HRA Levies) $2,398,000
City Funds (Preliminary and Final Design Eng’r – source HRA Levies) $1,818,000
City Funds (Right of Way – source HRA Levies) $2,700,000
City Water and Sewer Utility Funds $ 200,000
Total Committed Funds $21,140,000
Unfunded Amount $3,868,000
Funding
The city recently submitted an application for the 2012 Transportation Economic Development
(TED) grant program. On May 18, 2012, our project was selected to receive a $3 million grant
towards the infrastructure construction expenses. With award of the $3 million TED grant, the
remaining project funding gap is $3,868,000. Should Council chose to move forward with this
project, the city’s total necessary participation (including the funding gap) will be $10,984,000,
or about 44 percent of the $25,008,000 project total.
Study Session Meeting of June 11, 2012 (Item No. 4) Page 4
Subject: Project Update - Hwy 7 / Louisiana Avenue Interchange Project
For comparisons purpose, the city’s anticipated total commitment on the Wooddale Avenue
interchange is $8,151,729 or about 44 percent of the $18,759,902 project total. Staff earlier
advised Council that the city may have to participate to at least the 50% level to fully capitalize
this project.
Summary and Next Steps
In summary, final plans will be completed within about a month. Right of Way Pre-acquisition
Activities will be completed in mid to late-July. If Council is comfortable with the project
financing and willing to consider funding the remaining $3,868,000 gap (via HRA Levy
proceeds), staff recommends Council authorize Right of Way Acquisition Activities upon the
completion of the Pre-Acquisition Activities currently underway.
Staff is currently determining necessary utility relocation needs which will be coordinated
separately outside of this project. Some of these relocation activities will need to be ordered
shortly (Xcel Energy and Met Council) to meet the proposed schedule as well as minimize
construction complications and project delays.
The following schedule provides for a bid opening during February of 2013:
Right of Way Pre-Acquisition Activities May – July 2012
Right of Way Acquisition Activities (offers and negotiations) Late July – December 2012
Completion of Final Plans July 2012
Utility Relocations Fall 2012 – May 2013
Mn/DOT Approval of Plans, Specifications, Estimate Oct 2012
FHWA Authorizes Project Dec 2012
Advertise for Bids Jan 2013
Bid Opening Feb 2013
VISION CONSIDERATION:
The following Strategic Directions and focus areas have been identified by Council.
St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged community.
Focus will be on:
• Promoting regional transportation issues and related dedicated funding
sources affecting St. Louis Park including but not limited to Hwy. 100 and
SWLRT.
St. Louis Park is committed to promoting and integrating arts, culture and community
aesthetics in all city initiatives, including implementation where appropriate.
Attachments: Attachment 1 – Schedule (early start)
Prepared by: Jim Olson, Engineering Project Manager
Reviewed by: Michael P. Rardin, Public Works Director
Scott Brink, City Engineer
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
DRAFT Highway 7/Louisiana Avenue Interchange
Design and Right of Way Schedule - EARLY START
Revised December 2011
Printed 11/30/2011
Assumes one year extension for Federal funds to March 31, 2013.
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul
FONSI (EA approved)
Final Design (April 1 Start)
60% plans
Agency Review 60% Plans
Final plans
Agency Review Final Plans
Public Art Process/Aesthetic Design
Utility Coordination
Remedial Action Plan (RAP)
Agency Review of RAP
Special Provisions
Engineer's estimate
State Aid Engineer approval of plans
FHWA Authorization
Utility relocation certificate
Permit applications submitted
R/W Acquisition
R/W identification
Appraisals
Offers/Negotiation/Title & Possession
Condemnation initiated
Right of Way Certificate 1
Private Utility Relocation
Advertise for bids
Open bids (February 2013)
Award contract
Begin construction (April 1, 2013)
2012 2013
S:\PT\S\Stlou\116227\2-mgmt\Design Schedule (Early) Revised Dec 2011.xlsx
Study Session Meeting of June 11, 2012 (Item No. 4)
Subject: Project Update - Highway 7 / Louisiana Avenue Interchange Project Page 5
Meeting Date: June 11, 2012
Agenda Item #: 5
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Pedestrian and Bicycle System Implementation Plan and Policy Review
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff would like Council input on the proposed priorities and capital plan for building sidewalks
and trails as presented on May 29th.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Staff desires Council direction on the proposed Pedestrian and Bicycle Capital Improvement
Plan (CIP) regarding the following:
1. Which projects in the proposed CIP, if any, would the Council like accelerated?
2. Which projects in the proposed CIP, if any, would the Council like delayed?
3. Which projects, if any, would the Council like removed from the proposed CIP? These
could be left in the long term proposed plan to be constructed at some unknown future
time.
4. Is the ten year term for the CIP appropriate? Should that be shortened or lengthened?
5. Creation of on road biking facilities may require removal of on street parking; will that be
acceptable? Or should on street biking be pursued without removing on street parking?
BACKGROUND:
History
At the May 29th Study Session staff presented and answered questions regarding the Capital
Improvement Program for the proposed Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan. Council provided some
input on the CIP at the meeting and agreed to provide additional input at the Study Session
planned for June 11th.
Consideration
Map exhibits have been reduced in this report to include only those related to the proposed CIP
for easier viewing. The exhibits provided are the same ones used at the meeting of the 29th (no
changes).
Finally, staff has identified one policy issue that Council should be aware of during this CIP
review – the installation of “Bike Lanes” requires dedicated pavement space (striped bike lanes)
which could result in the elimination or restriction (possibly one side) of parking on some streets.
“Bike Ways” could also have the same result depending upon the type of “Bike Way” created or
used by the city. So, depending upon the type of on road bike facility used, there could be
parking restriction impacts or none at all.
Where eliminating on-street parking is not appropriate, it will limit the type of biking facility that
may be implemented. Council should be aware that separate biking facilities cannot be provided
in all areas. Bike Ways would utilize a shared lane strategy that may include signs and pavement
markings.
Study Session Meeting of June 11, 2012 (Item No. 5) Page 2
Subject: Pedestrian and Bicycle System Implementation Plan and Policy Review
Summary and Next Steps
After CIP project priority (construction years) has been established, staff will prepare a financial
plan and a public communications / involvement strategy for Council consideration. Final policy
issues will also be discussed in conjunction with these topics.
The following tentative process and schedule has been developed to aid in implementing this
plan:
Council discussed the proposed CIP project priority (const yrs) May 29
Council provides direction on the proposed CIP June 11
Council reviews financial and public involvement plans June 25
Council considers remaining policy questions June 25
Staff conducts public involvement / input process July - October
Council adopts proposed sidewalk, trail, and bikeway systems along
with, final policies, and the CIP
November - December
Construction May 2013 – Oct 2025
Based on the process associated with the adoption of the last sidewalk / trail plan and CIP, it is
possible this schedule could be extended for months to a year.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
None at this time.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Staff felt it would be beneficial for Council to have a well-defined purpose and goals as an aid in
discussing and deciding the policy questions associated with this initiative as well as assessing if
this is in alignment with the community vision. In that regard, the Active Living, Sidewalks and
Trail Plan recommended an approach to developing citywide pedestrian and bicycling systems,
addressing trails, sidewalks, key crossings and prioritizing their importance. It suggested a
strategy for implementation and identified preliminary costs. It looked at how existing areas of
concern might be improved and where and how new walks and trails should be installed.
Strategic Direction - The following vision Strategic Direction and focus areas were identified
by Council.
St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged community.
Focus will be on:
• Developing an expanded and organized network of sidewalks and trails.
Attachments: Exhibit G - 10 Year Capital Improvement Program (3 page spreadsheet)
Exhibit A1 - Sidewalk CIP - Grouped (map)
Exhibit A2 - Sidewalk CIP - By Year (map)
Exhibit B1 - Trail CIP - By Year (map)
Exhibit C1 - Bikeway CIP - Grouped (map)
Exhibit C2 - Bikeway CIP - By Year (map)
Prepared by: Michael P. Rardin, Public Works Director
Reviewed by: Sean Walther, Senior Planner
Scott Brink, City Engineer
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
1
SW
Line Length (ft)Ward Project Tpye Class Location (on or along)Side Begin End Const Yr Priority Total
1 5069 1 B L France Ave na N City Limits Minnetonka Blvd 2013 2 $0
2 1858 2 B L Monterey Dr na 36th St Excelsior Blvd 2013 2 $16,000
3 6059 3 B L Texas Ave na 28th St Hwy 7 2013 2 $51,500
4 4000 4 BL Texas Ave na Wayzata Blvd Cedar Lake Road 2013 1 $34,000
5 350 3 BW 28th St na Virginia Ave Texas Ave 2013 1 $1,000
6 3472 2 BW Alabama Ave na 36th St 41st St 2013 1 $6,000
7 1429 1 BW Cedar Lake Road na North Cedar Lake Regional Trail France Ave 2013 2 $3,000
8 350 4 BW Cedar Lake Road na Hwy 169 Louisiana Ave 2013 1 $16,000
9 1730 2 BW Park Commons Drive na Quentin Ave Monterey Dr 2013 1 $6,000
10 350 2 BW Texas Ave na Hwy 7 SW LRT Regional Trail 2013 2 $6,000
11 1436 3,4 BW Virginia Ave na Cedar Lake Road 28th St 2013 1 $3,000
12 4435 3 BW Walker St na Texas Ave Lake St 2013 2 $7,000
13 492 3 SW N 31st St south Dakota Ave Colorado Ave 2013 1 $22,000
14 648 3 SW C 33rd St south Texas Ave Rhode Island Ave 2013 1 $30,000
15 2264 1 SW C France Ave west 22nd St 26th St 2013 2 $0
16 1329 2 SW C Louisiana Ave west Lake St Oxford St 2013 1 $60,000
17 1124 3 SW C Walker St south east of Pennsylvania Ave 37th St (frontage road)2013 2 $30,000
18 270 3 Tr 32nd St south Pennsylvania Ave Oregon Ave 2013 1 $75,000
19 2462 3 Tr Louisiana Ave west 32nd St Walker St 2013 1 $106,000
20 1584 3 Tr Walker St north Louisiana Ave west of 37th St 2013 1 $32,000
21
22
23 3372 2 BW Brookside Ave na 41st St Yosemite Ave 2014 1 $6,000
24 6020 4 BW Cedar Lake Road na Louisiana Ave North Cedar Lake Regional Trail 2014 1 $18,000
25 5431 1,3 BW Dakota Ave na 26th St Wooddale Ave 2014 1 $10,000
26 5343 2 BW Quentin Ave na 44th St Park Commons Dr 2014 1 $10,000
27 971 2 SW C 41st St south Hwy 100 Wooddale Ave 2014 1 $22,000
28 141 2 SW C Wooddale Ave west Excelsior Blvd Vernon Ave 2014 1 $22,000
29 1830 2 Tr / Br Minnehaha Creek south Louisiana Ave west side of Meadowbrook Complex 2014 3 $180,000
30
31
32 3711 2 B L 36th St na Monterey Dr Alabama Ave 2015 2 $32,000
33 2886 1,2 B L Beltline Blvd na CSAH 25 36th St 2015 2 $25,000
34 4069 4 B L Shelard Parkway na Betty Crocker Dr Wayzata Blvd 2015 3 $35,000
35 1252 4 B L Wayzata Blvd na Ford Road 14th St 2015 2 $11,000
36 1285 4 BW 14th St na Wayzata Blvd Flag Ave 2015 2 $2,000
37 100 1 BW 26th St na Toledo Ave Hwy 100 2015 2 $100
38 5826 4 BW Flag, Westmoreland, and Franklin Ave's na 14th St Texas Ave 2015 2 $9,000
39 2179 4 BW Ford Road na Runnymeade Ave Crestridge Dr 2015 3 $3,300
40 4400 1 BW Minnetonka Blvd na Vernon Ave France Ave 2015 1 $10,000
41 1226 1 BW Ottawa Ave na CSAH 25 Minnetonka Blvd 2015 2 $4,000
42 1300 1 BW Toledo Ave na 28th St 26th St 2015 2 $2,000
43 1255 3 SW C 36th St south Aquila Ave Wyoming Ave 2015 2 $55,000
44 576 4 SW C Cedar Lake Road south Texas Ave Virginia Ave 2015 1 $25,000
45 752 2 SW C Louisiana Ave west Excelsior Blvd Minnehaha Creek 2015 1 $33,000
46 2859 2 Tr Beltline Blvd west CSAH 25 36th St 2015 3 $125,000
47 1300 1 Tr Toledo Ave west Minnetonka Blvd 28th St 2015 2 $58,500
48 2287 1 Tr / Br Hwy 100 west 26th St (Ped Br)Cedar Lake Road 2015 2 $3,000,000
49 150 1 Tr / Br Hwy 100 east 23rd St S side of Cedar Lake Road 2015 2 $2,906,000
50 1830 2 Tr / Br Minnehaha Creek north west side of Meadowbrook Complex Meadow Brook Road 2015 2 $180,000
51
52
53 5019 1,3 B L Lake St na Walker St Minnetonka Blvd 2016 2 $43,000
54 316 1 BW 26th St na Edgewood Ave Dakota Ave 2016 3 $1,000
55 669 1 BW Webster Ave na 28th St 27th St 2016 2 $1,000
56 1987 1,2 BW Wooddale Ave na Lake St 36th St 2016 2 $3,000
57 349 1 SW N Hamilton St south Alabama Ave Zarthan Ave 2016 2 $15,000
58 3371 4 SW C Pennsylvania Ave east Cedar Lake Road 16th St 2016 3 $145,000
59 1050 1 SW N Zarthan Ave west 33rd St Hamilton St 2016 2 $45,000
60 246 1 SW N Zarthan Ave west 400' south of Minnetonka Blvd 680' north of Lake St 2016 2 $11,000
2013 thru 2023
Exhibit G
10 Year CIP
Study Session Meeting of June 11, 2012 (Item No. 5)
Subject: Pedestrian and Bicycle System Implementation Plan and Policy Review Page 3
2
SW
Line Length (ft)Ward Project Tpye Class Location (on or along)Side Begin End Const Yr Priority Total
2013 thru 2023
Exhibit G
10 Year CIP
61
63 16321 4 B L Louisiana Ave na Wayzata Blvd Excelsior Blvd 2017 2 $140,000
64 4185 3 BW 36th St na Hwy 169 Texas Ave 2017 2 $7,000
65 1748 3 SW N 33rd St south Aquila Ave Virginia Ave 2017 2 $75,000
66 480 3 SW C 34th St south Flag Ave / Aquila Lane S Aquila Ave S 2017 3 $21,000
67 519 3 SW C Aquila Ave east Minnetonka Blvd 1/2 block south of Minnetonka Blvd 2017 3 $23,000
68 1563 3 SW C Aquila Ave / 34th St south Flag Ave Cavell Lane 2017 3 $68,000
69 630 3 SW C Aquila Lane south Cavell Lane one block north of Cavell Lane 2017 2 $28,000
70 782 3 SW C Flag Ave east 34th St 36th St 2017 3 $67,000
71 3200 4 SW C Louisiana Ave east Cedar Lake Road Wayzata Blvd 2017 1 $140,000
72
73
74 1704 4 BW Edgewood Ave na Cedar Lake Road BNSF RR 2018 3 $3,000
75 1332 4 BW Quentin Ave na Louisiana Ave Pennsylvania Ave 2018 3 $2,000
76 6642 4 BW Wayzata Blvd na Texas Ave Zarthan Ave 2018 3 $10,000
77 428 2 SW N Quentin Ave west Excelsior Blvd 40th St 2018 2 $20,000
78 5078 4 SW C Texas Ave west Cedar Lake Road Wayzata Blvd 2018 3 $220,000
79 1,4 Tr / Br Edgewood Ave na BNSF RR BNSF RR 2018 3 $2,000,000
80
81
82 629 4 SW C Cedar Lake Road south 16th St Zarthan Ave 2019 3 $27,000
83 1658 4 SW C Edgewood Ave east Cedar Lake Road BNSF RR 2019 3 $72,000
84 1405 4 SW C Franklin Ave south Hampshire Ave Cedar Lake Road 2019 3 $61,000
85 2585 4 SW C Quentin Ave east Douglas Ave Cedar Lake Road 2019 3 $115,000
87 51 1 SW N Quentin Ave east 28th St 200' north of 28th St 2019 3 $3,000
89 647 4 SW C Zarthan west 16th St Cedar Lake Road 2019 3 $28,000
90
91
92 1420 4 B L Quentin Ave na Douglas Ave Cedar Lake Road 2020 3 $13,000
94 1687 4 B L Zarthan Ave na Cedar Lake Road Wayzata Blvd 2020 2 $15,000
95 4397 1 BW 26th St na Toledo Ave France Ave 2020 3 $6,000
96 662 1 BW 28th St na Quentin Ave Ottawa Ave 2020 3 $1,000
97 1332 1 BW Ottawa Ave na 28th St Minnetonka Blvd 2020 3 $2,000
98 3029 4 BW Park Place Blvd na I-394 Cedar Lake Road 2020 2 $5,000
99 1317 1 BW Quentin Ave na 26th St 28th St 2020 3 $2,000
100 6642 4 BW Wayzata Blvd na Park Place Blvd East City Limits 2020 2 $3,000
101 823 1 SW C 25 1/2 St south and west Hwy 100 26th St 2020 3 $36,000
102 640 1 SW N Joppa west Minnetonka Blvd 1/3 block north of Sunset Ave 2020 3 $31,000
103 1231 1 SW N Ottawa Ave east and west 28th St 29th St 2020 3 $55,000
104 622 1 SW N Quentin Ave east 26th St 27th St 2020 3 $30,000
105 25 1 SW N Toledo east 26th St 25' s of 26th St 2020 3 $1,000
106 2000 1 Tr Twin Lakes Park / BSM na Twin Lakes Park Hwy 100 E Frontage Road 2020 2 $78,000
107
108
109 675 1 BW 27th St na Webster Ave Utica Ave 2021 3 $1,500
110 6520 1,3 BW 28th St na Texas Ave Zarthan Ave 2021 3 $10,000
111 626 1 BW 28th St na Yosemite Ave Webster Ave 2021 3 $1,000
112 2894 3 BW 33rd St na Louisiana Ave Dakota Ave 2021 3 $5,000
113 1304 3 BW 33rd St na Virginia Ave Rhode Island Ave 2021 2 $2,000
114 327 1 BW Utica Ave na 27th St 26th St Ped Bridge 2021 3 $500
115 5230 3 SW N 31st St south Texas Ave Dakota Ave 2021 2 $225,000
116 593 3 SW N Georgia Ave east Minnetonka Blvd 31st St 2021 2 $26,000
117 146 3 SW N Jersey Ave east Minnetonka Blvd 1/4 block south of Minnetonka Blvd 2021 2 $27,000
118 146 3 SW N Jersey Ave west Minnetonka Blvd 1/4 block south of Minnetonka Blvd 2021 3 $6,500
119 146 3 SW N Maryland Ave east and west Minnetonka Blvd 1/2 block south of Minnetonka Blvd 2021 2 $14,000
120 612 3 SW N Quebec Ave west 31st St Oak Hill Park 2021 2 $225,000
121
Study Session Meeting of June 11, 2012 (Item No. 5)
Subject: Pedestrian and Bicycle System Implementation Plan and Policy Review Page 4
3
SW
Line Length (ft)Ward Project Tpye Class Location (on or along)Side Begin End Const Yr Priority Total
2013 thru 2023
Exhibit G
10 Year CIP
122
123 2046 2 BW 38th St na Excelsior Blvd France Ave 2022 2 $4,000
124 4958 2 BW France Ave na Randall Ave 40th St 2022 2 $8,000
125 1693 2 SW N 36 1/2 St north Monterey Dr Excelsior Blvd 2022 2 $73,000
126 947 2 SW N 39th St south Inglewood Ave France Ave 2022 2 $41,000
127 1650 2 SW N 39th St south Natchez Ave Inglewood Ave 2022 2 $71,000
128 1275 2 SW N 40th St north Joppa / Grimes Natchez Ave 2022 3 $54,000
129 932 2 SW C Brookside Ave north 42nd St Yosemite Ave 2022 3 $40,000
130 168 2 SW N Browndale Ave west 43 1/2 St 1/4 block north of 43 1/2 St 2022 2 $8,000
131 1051 2 SW C Browndale Ave west Wooddale Ave Morningside Road 2022 2 $46,000
132 1441 2 SW C Excelsior Blvd south Louisiana Ave Meadowbrook Blvd 2022 3 $63,000
133 1032 2 SW C Morningside Road north Mackey Ave Browndale Ave 2022 3 $45,000
134 330 2 SW C Morningside Road south Wooddale Ave East City Limits 2022 3 $14,000
135
136
137 1343 4 SW C 14th St west and south Wayzata Blvd Flag Ave 2023 3 $58,000
138 484 4 SW C 18th St south Hillsboro Ave Flag Ave 2023 3 $21,000
139 297 4 SW N 25th St north 26th St Sumter Ave 2023 3 $13,000
140 313 4 SW N 26th St north Virginia Ave 25th St 2023 3 $14,000
141 390 3 SW C 28th St south Virginia Ave Texas Ave 2023 3 $17,000
142 488 4 SW C Flag Ave west 18th St Franklin Ave 2023 3 $21,000
143 1384 4 SW C Hillsboro Ave west 14th St Franklin Ave 2023 3 $60,000
144 1071 4 SW N Sumter Ave west Cedar Lake Road 25th St 2023 3 $46,000
145 1420 3,4 SW C Virginia Ave west 28th St Cedar Lake Road 2023 3 $61,000
146 4039 4 SW C Westmoreland / Franklin Aves north 14th St Westwood Nature Center 2023 3 $175,000
Totals
Segment in two wards
Study Session Meeting of June 11, 2012 (Item No. 5)
Subject: Pedestrian and Bicycle System Implementation Plan and Policy Review Page 5
34TH ST
LAKE S
T
27TH ST
WALKE R ST ALABAMA AVETEXAS AVE44 TH STFLORIDA AVEOXFOR
D
S
T GEORGIA AVEYOSEMITE AVE41ST STIDAHO AVERH ODE ISL AND AVEJERSEY AVEWOODDALE
AVE37TH ST LOUISIANA AVEBNSF RR
EXCELSI
O
R
B
L
V
D
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
L
N
3 5 T H S T
38TH STKENTUCKY AVE39TH ST
CEDAR LAKE R D
VERNON AVEKIPLING AVEWAYZATA B L V D
2 8 T H S T
F O R D R D
INGLEWOOD AVESHELARD PKWY
25 1/2 ST
GORHAM AVEPARK G
L
E
N
R
D
BRUNSWICK AVEBELT LINE BLVDMINN ETON KA BLVD
EXCELSIOR BL
V
D
31ST ST
BROWNDALE AVE16TH ST
HUNTINGTON AVEZARTHAN AVEC
LUB RD
36 TH S T
2 3 R D S T
26TH ST
3 6 1/2 STMARYLAND AVEMOR NINGSIDE RDZINRAN AVETOLEDO AVEMELROSE AVE32ND ST
UTICA AVENORTH
S
T
42ND ST
DOUGLAS AVE
GLENHURST AVE24TH ST
HAMILT ON ST
XENWOOD AVEWEBSTER AVENEVADA AVEF R A N K LIN AV E
POW ELL RD
VIRGINIA CIR
22ND ST
29TH ST
40TH STDAKOTA AVESALEM AVELYNN AVE25TH S T
BASSWOOD RD18TH STOTTAWA AVE14TH ST
FRANCE AVECAMBRIDGE STQUEBEC AVERALEIGH AVEUTAH AVESUMTER AVEAQUILA AVECOLORADO AVEPENNSYLVA NIA AVEEDGEWOOD AVERIDGE DR
MONTEREY AVEHAMPSHIRE AVE33RD STOREGON AVESUNS ET BLVDCP RRPA RK CE N TER BLVDUTICA AVE35TH ST
18TH ST
AQUI
L
A
A
V
E
WEBSTER AVEUTICA AVE32ND ST XENWOOD AVEYOSEMITE AVE31ST STBRUNSWICK AVEIDAHO AVEQUEBEC AVECP RR
CP
RRCP RRKENTUCKY AVEGEORGIA AVE29TH ST
3 7 T H S T
27TH ST
2 2N D S T
QUENTIN AVEWAYZATA BLVD
JOPPA AVE37TH ST
36TH ST TEXAS AVE34TH STFLAG A
VE
JERSEY AVEALABAMA AVE2 3 R D S TQUENT I
N AVEFLAG
AVEFORD RDLAKE ST34TH ST
OXFORD ST OTTAWA AVEWO
O
D
D
A
L
E
A
V
E
33RD ST
28TH ST
16TH ST
36TH ST
HUNTINGTON AVE35TH ST
JOPPA AVE26TH ST
27TH ST
ALABA MA AVEEDGEWOOD AVE28TH ST
CEDAR
L
A
K
E
R
D
31ST ST
25TH ST
3 9 T H S T
26TH ST
16TH S T
1ST ST2ND STPARK PLACE BLVDZARTHAN AVEZARTHAN AVETOLEDO AVE
32ND ST
42ND ST
42ND STAQUILA LNGLENHURST AVEBROOK AVEXENWOOD AVEEDGEB
R
O
O
K
D
R
FOREST RD
NEVADA AVE40TH L
N
ELIOT
VI
E
W
R
D
43 1/2 ST
MACKEY AVE40TH S
T
DAKOTA AVEDAKOTA AVESALEM AVELYNN AVELYNN AVE18TH ST
MO
N
T
E
R
E
Y
D
R
V A L L A C H E R A V EWESTWOOD HILLS D R WESTWOODHILLSDR30 1/2 ST
34 1/2 ST
14TH ST
BOONE AVEBOONE AVE
BOONEAVEWEST
M
ORELAND LNUTAH DRQUE
B
E
C
A
V
E
Q UEBEC AVERALEIGH AVERALEIGH AVEX YLON AVEXYLON AVEXYLON AVEXYLON AVEGAMBLE DR
22ND LN
B
R
O
W
N
L
O
W
A
V
E
35 TH STJORDAN AVEDART AVEUTAH AVEUTAH AVEUTAH AVESUMTER AVEBURD
PL
STANL EN RD
CA
V
E
L
L
AVECAVELL AVECAVELL AVEPARKLANDS RDCOLORADO AVECOLORADO AVECEDAR LAKE AVEKILMER AVEKILMER AVEPARK COM M O N S D R
32 1/2 ST
CEDARWOOD RD
C ED ARWO
O
D
R
D
MEADOWBROOK RDPARKER RD
BLACKSTONE AVEBLACKSTONE AVEBLACKSTONE AVE13TH LN
13TH LN
TAFT AVEWYOMING AVEWYOMING AVEEDGEWOOD AVEEDGEWOOD AVE13 1/2 ST
M
O
NIT
O
R
S
T
FORD LN
RANDAL
L
A
V
E
INDEPENDENCE
A
VEINDEPENDENCE AVEINDEPEND ENCE AVEINDEPENDENCE AVEPA RKWOODS R D
MONTEREY AVEHAMPSHIRE AVEHAMPSHIRE AVE3 3 R D S T
33RD ST 33RD ST NATCHEZ AVENATCHEZ AVENATCHEZ AVEW O L F E PKW Y24TH ST W
OREGON AVEOREGON AVEOREGON AVEREPUBLIC AVEVIRGINIA
A
V
E
VIRGINIA AVEVIRGINIA AV E
VIRGINIA AVEPRINCETON AVEPRINCETON AVEWESTSIDE DR
DECATUR LNYUKON AVEY U KON AVEGETTYSBURGAVEGETTYSBURG AVECAVELL LN
H ILLSBORO AVEH
I
L
LSBORO AVEHILLSBORO AVEHILL SBORO AVEPARKDALE D
RLANCASTERAVE
PHILLIPS PKWYGLENHURST RDC
E
D
AR LAKE RDHILL LN
DECATURAVEDECATUR AVEM EADOWBROO
K
B
L
VDMEADO
WBROOK
B
L
V
D
GLEN PL
HIGHWOOD RD
MINNEHAHA C
I
REXCELSIORWAYWOODLAND DRBROOKVIEWDR F
O
R
E
S
T L
N
LOUISIANA CTLNFAIRWAYLN
ENSIGNAVETE X A TONKA AVEWILLOW LNWILLOWLNPRKR24THLN WESTWOOD HILLS CRV
AQUILA CIRBOONECT WESTRIDGE LNMINNEHAHA
CT
TEXAS
CIR
OAK LEAF
CT
FORD
CIR
OTTAWA AVE28TH STAQUILA AVE
31ST
ST
YOSEMI TE AVEAQUILA AVEFLAG AVE31ST ST
C ED AR LAK E RD
24TH S
T
31ST ST
22NDST COLORADO AVE25 1/2 ST
ZARTHAN AVE16TH ST
ALABAMA AVE14T H S T
FLAG AVE16TH ST
1 6 TH ST
26TH
ST
SALEM AVEQUEBEC AVEPENNSYL VANIA AVEZINR AN AVEGLENHURST AVETOLEDO AVE18TH ST
2 3 R D ST
31ST ST
SALEM AVELYNN AVEPENNSYLVANIAAVECOLORADO AVE23 RD ST
24TH ST
HUNTINGTON AVE18TH ST
27TH STDAKOTA AVE25TH ST
VERNON AVE41ST ST
29TH STMARYLAND AVE28TH
ST
25TH ST
18 T H S T
26TH ST
ID
A
H
ONEVADA AVE24THST
23RD ST
RALE
IGH
AVE
37TH ST
22ND ST
31ST
ST
18TH
KIPLING AVEPENNSYLVANIA AVESUMTER AVE23RD
ST
FRA N K L I N AV E
WEBSTER AVEWEBSTERAVEFLORIDA AVE28TH ST
OTTAWA AVEOTTAWA AVE14TH ST
RHODE ISLAND AVE16TH ST
22 ND ST BRUNSWICK AVE16TH ST
OXFORD ST YOSEMITE AVEJOPPA AVEDAKOTAAVE39TH ST INGLEWOOD AVEFRANKLIN AVE
41ST ST
29TH STWEST END BLVDDUKE DR16TH ST
UTICA AVEExhibit A1
Sidewalk CIP
5-23-2012tw
Legend
2013 - 2016
2017 - 2020
2021 - 2023
.Grouped
Study Session Meeting of June 11, 2012 (Item No. 5)
Subject: Pedestrian and Bicycle System Implementation Plan and Policy Review Page 6
34TH ST
LAKE S
T
27TH ST
WALKE R ST ALABAMA AVETEXAS AVE44 TH STFLORIDA AVEOXFOR
D
S
T GEORGIA AVEYOSEMITE AVE41ST STIDAHO AVERH ODE ISL AND AVEJERSEY AVEWOODDALE
AVE37TH ST LOUISIANA AVEBNSF RR
EXCELSI
O
R
B
L
V
D
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
L
N
3 5 T H S T
38TH STKENTUCKY AVE39TH ST
CEDAR LAKE R D
VERNON AVEKIPLING AVEWAYZATA B L V D
2 8 T H S T
F O R D R D
INGLEWOOD AVESHELARD PKWY
25 1/2 ST
GORHAM AVEPARK G
L
E
N
R
D
BRUNSWICK AVEBELT LINE BLVDMINN ETON KA BLVD
EXCELSIOR BL
V
D
31ST ST
BROWNDALE AVE16TH ST
HUNTINGTON AVEZARTHAN AVEC
LUB RD
36 TH S T
2 3 R D S T
26TH ST
3 6 1/2 STMARYLAND AVEMOR NINGSIDE RDZINRAN AVETOLEDO AVEMELROSE AVE32ND ST
UTICA AVENORTH
S
T
42ND ST
DOUGLAS AVE
GLENHURST AVE24TH ST
HAMILT ON ST
XENWOOD AVEWEBSTER AVENEVADA AVEF R A N K LIN AV E
POW ELL RD
VIRGINIA CIR
22ND ST
29TH ST
40TH STDAKOTA AVESALEM AVELYNN AVE25TH S T
BASSWOOD RD18TH STOTTAWA AVE14TH ST
FRANCE AVECAMBRIDGE STQUEBEC AVERALEIGH AVEUTAH AVESUMTER AVEAQUILA AVECOLORADO AVEPENNSYLVA NIA AVEEDGEWOOD AVERIDGE DR
MONTEREY AVEHAMPSHIRE AVE33RD STOREGON AVESUNS ET BLVDCP RRPA RK CE N TER BLVDUTICA AVE35TH ST
18TH ST
AQUI
L
A
A
V
E
WEBSTER AVEUTICA AVE32ND ST XENWOOD AVEYOSEMITE AVE31ST STBRUNSWICK AVEIDAHO AVEQUEBEC AVECP RR
CP
RRCP RRKENTUCKY AVEGEORGIA AVE29TH ST
3 7 T H S T
27TH ST
2 2N D S T
QUENTIN AVEWAYZATA BLVD
JOPPA AVE37TH ST
36TH ST TEXAS AVE34TH STFLAG A
VE
JERSEY AVEALABAMA AVE2 3 R D S TQUENT I
N AVEFLAG
AVEFORD RDLAKE ST34TH ST
OXFORD ST OTTAWA AVEWO
O
D
D
A
L
E
A
V
E
33RD ST
28TH ST
16TH ST
36TH ST
HUNTINGTON AVE35TH ST
JOPPA AVE26TH ST
27TH ST
ALABA MA AVEEDGEWOOD AVE28TH ST
CEDAR
L
A
K
E
R
D
31ST ST
25TH ST
3 9 T H S T
26TH ST
16TH S T
1ST ST2ND STPARK PLACE BLVDZARTHAN AVEZARTHAN AVETOLEDO AVE
32ND ST
42ND ST
42ND STAQUILA LNGLENHURST AVEBROOK AVEXENWOOD AVEEDGEB
R
O
O
K
D
R
FOREST RD
NEVADA AVE40TH L
N
ELIOT
VI
E
W
R
D
43 1/2 ST
MACKEY AVE40TH S
T
DAKOTA AVEDAKOTA AVESALEM AVELYNN AVELYNN AVE18TH ST
MO
N
T
E
R
E
Y
D
R
V A L L A C H E R A V EWESTWOOD HILLS D R WESTWOODHILLSDR30 1/2 ST
34 1/2 ST
14TH ST
BOONE AVEBOONE AVE
BOONEAVEWEST
M
ORELAND LNUTAH DRQUE
B
E
C
A
V
E
Q UEBEC AVERALEIGH AVERALEIGH AVEX YLON AVEXYLON AVEXYLON AVEXYLON AVEGAMBLE DR
22ND LN
B
R
O
W
N
L
O
W
A
V
E
35 TH STJORDAN AVEDART AVEUTAH AVEUTAH AVEUTAH AVESUMTER AVEBURD
PL
STANL EN RD
CA
V
E
L
L
AVECAVELL AVECAVELL AVEPARKLANDS RDCOLORADO AVECOLORADO AVECEDAR LAKE AVEKILMER AVEKILMER AVEPARK COM M O N S D R
32 1/2 ST
CEDARWOOD RD
C ED ARWO
O
D
R
D
MEADOWBROOK RDPARKER RD
BLACKSTONE AVEBLACKSTONE AVEBLACKSTONE AVE13TH LN
13TH LN
TAFT AVEWYOMING AVEWYOMING AVEEDGEWOOD AVEEDGEWOOD AVE13 1/2 ST
M
O
NIT
O
R
S
T
FORD LN
RANDAL
L
A
V
E
INDEPENDENCE
A
VEINDEPENDENCE AVEINDEPEND ENCE AVEINDEPENDENCE AVEPA RKWOODS R D
MONTEREY AVEHAMPSHIRE AVEHAMPSHIRE AVE3 3 R D S T
33RD ST 33RD ST NATCHEZ AVENATCHEZ AVENATCHEZ AVEW O L F E PKW Y24TH ST W
OREGON AVEOREGON AVEOREGON AVEREPUBLIC AVEVIRGINIA
A
V
E
VIRGINIA AVEVIRGINIA AV E
VIRGINIA AVEPRINCETON AVEPRINCETON AVEWESTSIDE DR
DECATUR LNYUKON AVEY U KON AVEGETTYSBURGAVEGETTYSBURG AVECAVELL LN
H ILLSBORO AVEH
I
L
LSBORO AVEHILLSBORO AVEHILL SBORO AVEPARKDALE D
RLANCASTERAVE
PHILLIPS PKWYGLENHURST RDC
E
D
AR LAKE RDHILL LN
DECATURAVEDECATUR AVEM EADOWBROO
K
B
L
VDMEADO
WBROOK
B
L
V
D
GLEN PL
HIGHWOOD RD
MINNEHAHA C
I
REXCELSIORWAYWOODLAND DRBROOKVIEWDR F
O
R
E
S
T L
N
LOUISIANA CTLNFAIRWAYLN
ENSIGNAVETE X A TONKA AVEWILLOW LNWILLOWLNPRKR24THLN WESTWOOD HILLS CRV
AQUILA CIRBOONECT WESTRIDGE LNMINNEHAHA
CT
TEXAS
CIR
OAK LEAF
CT
FORD
CIR
OTTAWA AVE28TH STAQUILA AVE
31ST
ST
YOSEMI TE AVEAQUILA AVEFLAG AVE31ST ST
C ED AR LAK E RD
24TH S
T
31ST ST
22NDST COLORADO AVE25 1/2 ST
ZARTHAN AVE16TH ST
ALABAMA AVE14T H S T
FLAG AVE16TH ST
1 6 TH ST
26TH
ST
SALEM AVEQUEBEC AVEPENNSYL VANIA AVEZINR AN AVEGLENHURST AVETOLEDO AVE18TH ST
2 3 R D ST
31ST ST
SALEM AVELYNN AVEPENNSYLVANIAAVECOLORADO AVE23 RD ST
24TH ST
HUNTINGTON AVE18TH ST
27TH STDAKOTA AVE25TH ST
VERNON AVE41ST ST
29TH STMARYLAND AVE28TH
ST
25TH ST
18 T H S T
26TH ST
ID
A
H
ONEVADA AVE24THST
23RD ST
RALE
IGH
AVE
37TH ST
22ND ST
31ST
ST
18TH
KIPLING AVEPENNSYLVANIA AVESUMTER AVE23RD
ST
FRA N K L I N AV E
WEBSTER AVEWEBSTERAVEFLORIDA AVE28TH ST
OTTAWA AVEOTTAWA AVE14TH ST
RHODE ISLAND AVE16TH ST
22 ND ST BRUNSWICK AVE16TH ST
OXFORD ST YOSEMITE AVEJOPPA AVEDAKOTAAVE39TH ST INGLEWOOD AVEFRANKLIN AVE
41ST ST
29TH STWEST END BLVDDUKE DR16TH ST
UTICA AVEExhibit A2
Sidewalk CIP
5-23-2012tw
Legend
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
.By Year
Study Session Meeting of June 11, 2012 (Item No. 5)
Subject: Pedestrian and Bicycle System Implementation Plan and Policy Review Page 7
34TH ST
LAKE S
T
27TH ST
WALKE R ST ALABAMA AVETEXAS AVE44 TH S
TFLORIDA AVEOXFOR
D
S
T GEORGIA AVEYOSEMITE AVE41ST STIDAHO AVERH ODE ISL AND AVEJERSEY AVEWOODDALE
AVE37TH ST LOUISIANA AVEBNSF RR
EXCEL
SI
O
R
B
L
V
D
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
L
N
3 5 T H S T
38TH STKENTUCKY AVE39TH ST
CEDAR LAKE R D
VERNON AVEKIPLING AVEWAYZATA B L V D
2 8 T H S T
F O R D R D
INGLEWOOD AVESHELARD PKWY
25 1/2 ST
GORHAM AVEPARK G
L
E
N
R
D
BRUNSWICK AVEBELT LINE BLVDMINN ETON KA BLVD
EXCELSIOR B
L
V
D
31ST ST
BROWNDALE AVE16TH ST
HUNTINGTON AVEZARTHAN AVEC
LUB RD
36 TH S T
2 3 R D S T
26TH ST
3 6 1/2 STMARYLAND AVEMOR NING SIDE RDZINRAN AVETOLEDO AVEMELROSE AVE32ND ST
UTICA AVENORTH
S
T
42ND ST
DOUGLAS AVE
GLENHURST AVE24TH ST
HAMILT ON ST
XENWOOD AVEWEBSTER AVENEVADA AVEF R A N K LIN AV E
POWELL RD
VIRGINIA CIR
22ND ST
29TH ST
40TH STDAKOTA AVESALEM AVELYNN AVE25TH S T
BASSWOO D RD18TH STOTTAWA AVE14TH ST
FRANCE AVECAMBRIDGE STQUEBEC AVERALEIGH AVEUTAH AVESUMTER AVEAQUILA AVECOLORADO AVEPENNSYLVA NIA AVEEDGEWOOD AVERIDGE DR
MONTEREY AVEHAMPSHIRE AVE33RD STOREGON AVESUN S ET BLVDCP RRPA R K C E N TER BLVDUTICA AVE35TH ST
18TH ST
AQUI
L
A
A
V
E
WEBSTER AVEUTICA AVE32ND ST XENWOOD AVEYOSEMITE AVE31ST STBRUNSWICK AVEIDAHO AVEQUEBEC AVECP RR
CP
RR
CP RRKENTUCKY AVEGEORGIA AVE29TH ST
3 7 T H S T
27TH ST
2 2N D S T
QUENTIN AVEWAYZATA BLVD
JOPPA AVE37TH ST
36TH ST TEXAS AVE34TH STFLAG A
VE
JERSEY AVEALABAMA AVE2 3 R D S TQUENT
I
N AVEFLA
G
AVEFORD RDLAKE ST34TH ST
OXFORD ST OTTAWA AVEWO
O
D
D
A
L
E
A
V
E
33RD ST
28TH ST
16TH ST
36TH ST
HUNTINGTON AVE35TH ST
JOPPA AVE26TH ST
27TH ST
ALABA MA AVEEDGEWOOD AVE28TH ST
CEDAR
L
A
K
E
R
D
31ST ST
25TH ST
3 9 T H S T
26TH ST
16TH S T
1ST ST2ND STPARK PLACE BLVDZARTHAN AVEZARTHAN AVETOLEDO AVE
32ND ST
42ND ST
42ND STAQUILA LNGLENHURST AVEBROOK AVEXENWOOD AVEEDGEB
R
O
O
K
D
R
FOREST RD
NEVADA AVE40TH L
N
ELIOT
VI
E
W
R
D
43 1/2 ST
MACKEY AVE40TH S
T
DAKOTA AVEDAKOTA AVESALEM AVELYNN AVELYNN AVE18TH ST
MO
N
T
E
R
E
Y
D
R
V A L L A C H E R A V EWESTWOOD HILLS D R WESTWOODHILLSDR30 1/2 ST
34 1/2 ST
14TH ST
BOONE AVEBOONE AVE
BOONEAVEWEST
M
ORELAND LNUTAH DRQUE
B
E
C
A
V
E
Q UEBEC AVERALEIGH AVERALEIGH AVEX YLON AVEXYLON AVEXYLON AVEXYLON AVEGAMBLE DR
22ND LN
B
R
O
W
N
L
O
W
A
V
E
35 TH STJORDAN AVEDART AVEUTAH AVEUTAH AVEUTAH AVESUMTER AVEBURD
PL
STAN LEN RD
CA
V
E
L
L
AVECAVELL AVECAVELL AVEPARKLANDS RDCOLORADO AVECOLORADO AVECEDAR LAKE AVEKILMER AVEKILMER AVEPARK COM M O N S D R
32 1/2 ST
CEDARWOOD RD
C ED ARWO
O
D
R
D
MEADOWBROOK RDPARKER RD
BLACKSTONE AVEBLACKSTONE AVEBLACKSTONE AVE13TH LN
13TH LN
TAFT AVEWYOMING AVEWYOMING AVEEDGEWOOD AVEEDGEWOOD AVE13 1/2 ST
M
O
NIT
O
R
S
T
FORD LN
RANDAL
L
A
V
E
INDEPENDENCE
A
VEINDEPENDENCE AVEINDEPEND ENCE AVEINDEPENDENCE AVEPA RKWOODS R D
MONTEREY AVEHAMPSHIRE AVEHAMPSHIRE AVE3 3 R D S T
33RD ST 33RD ST NATCHEZ AVENATCHEZ AVENATCHEZ AVEW O L F E PKW Y24TH ST W
OREGON AVEOREGON AVEOREGON AVEREPUBLIC AVEVIRGINIA
A
V
E
VIRGINIA AVEVIRGINIA AV E
VIRGINIA AVEPRINCETON AVEPRINCETON AVEWESTSIDE DR
DECATUR LNYUKON AVEY U KON AVEGETTYSBURGAVEGETTYSBURG AVECAVELL LN
H ILLSBORO AVEH
I
L
LSBORO AVEHILLSBORO AVEHILL SBORO AVEPARKDALE D
RLANCASTERAVE
PHILLIPS PKWYGLENHURST RDC
E
D
AR LAKE RDHILL LN
DECATURAVEDECATUR AVEMEADOWBRO
O
K
B
L
VDMEADO
WBROOK
B
L
V
D
GLEN PL
HIG
HWOOD RD
MINNEHAHA C
I
REXCELSIORWAYWOODLAND
DRBROOKVIEWDR F
O
R
E
S
T LN
LOUISIANA CTLNFAIRWAYLN
ENSIGNAVETE X A TONKA AVEWILLOW LNWILLOWLNPRKR24THLN WESTWOOD HILLS CRV
AQUILA CIRBOONECT WESTRIDGE LNMINNEHAHA
CT
TEXAS
CIR
OAK LEAF
CT
FORD
CIR
OTTAWA AVE28TH STAQUILA AVE
31ST
ST
YOSEMI TE AVEAQUILA AVEFLAG AVE31ST ST
C E D AR LA KE RD
24TH S
T
31ST ST
22NDST COLORADO AVE25 1/2 ST
ZARTHAN AVE16TH ST
ALABAMA AVE14T H S T
FLAG AVE16TH ST
1 6 TH ST
26TH
ST
SALEM AVEQUEBEC AVEPENNSYL VANIA AVEZINR AN AVEGLENHURST AVETOLEDO AVE18TH ST
2 3 R D ST
31ST ST
SALEM AVELYNN AVEPENNSYLVANIAAVECOLORADO AVE2 3RD ST
24TH ST
HUNTINGTON AVE18TH ST
27TH STDAKOTA AVE25TH ST
VERNON AVE41ST ST
29TH STMARYLAND AVE28TH
ST
25TH ST
1 8 T H S T
26TH ST
ID
A
H
ONEVADA AVE24THST
23RD ST
RALE
IGH
AVE
37TH ST
22ND ST
31ST
ST
18TH
KIPLING AVEPENNSYLVANIA AVESUMTER AVE23RD
ST
FRA N K L I N A V E
WEBSTER AVEWEBSTERAVEFLORIDA AVE28TH ST
OTTAWA AVEOTTAWA AVE14TH ST
RHODE ISLAND AVE16TH ST
22 ND ST BRUNSWICK AVE16TH ST
OXFORD ST YOSEMITE AVEJOPPA AVEDAKOTAAVE39TH ST INGLEWOOD AVEFRANKLIN AVE
41ST ST
29TH STWEST END BLVDDUKE DR16TH ST
UTICA AVEExhibit B1
Trail CIP
5-23-2012tw
.
Legend
Future Bridges
Future Trails
2013
2014
2015
2020
Existing Trails
By Year
Study Session Meeting of June 11, 2012 (Item No. 5)
Subject: Pedestrian and Bicycle System Implementation Plan and Policy Review Page 8
34TH ST
LAKE S
T
27TH ST
WALKE R ST ALABAMA AVETEXAS AVE44 TH STFLORIDA AVEOXFOR
D
S
T GEORGIA AVEYOSEMITE AVE41ST STIDAHO AVERH ODE ISL AND AVEJERSEY AVEWOODDALE
AVE37TH ST LOUISIANA AVEBNSF RR
EXCELSI
O
R
B
L
V
D
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
L
N
3 5 T H S T
38TH STKENTUCKY AVE39TH ST
CEDAR LAKE R D
VERNON AVEKIPLING AVEWAYZATA B L V D
2 8 T H S T
F O R D R D
INGLEWOOD AVES HELARD PKW Y
25 1/2 ST
GORHAM AVEPARK G
L
E
N
R
D
BRUNSWICK AVEBELT LINE BLVDMINN ETON KA BLVD
EXCELSIOR BL
V
D
31ST ST
BROWNDALE AVE16TH ST
HUNTINGTON AVEZARTHAN AVEC
LUB RD
3 6TH S T
2 3 R D S T
26TH ST
3 6 1/2 STMARYLAND AVEMOR NINGSIDE RDZINRAN AVETOLEDO AVEMELROSE AVE32ND ST
UTICA AVENORTH
S
T
42ND ST
DOUGLAS AVE
GLENHURST AVE24TH ST
HAMILT ON ST
XENWOOD AVEWEBSTER AVENEVADA AVEF R A N K LIN AV E
P OWELL RD
VIRGINIA CIR
22ND ST
29TH ST
40TH STDAKOTA AVESALEM AVELYNN AVE25TH S T
BASSWOOD RD18TH STOTTAWA AVE14TH ST
FRANCE AVECAMBRIDGE STQUEBEC AVERALEIGH AVEUTAH AVESUMTER AVEAQUILA AVECOLORADO AVEPENNSYLVA NIA AVEEDGEWOOD AVERIDGE DR
MONTEREY AVEHAMPSHIRE AVE33RD STOREGON AVESUNS ET BLVDCP RRPA RK C E N TER BLVDUTICA AVE35TH ST
18TH ST
AQUI
L
A
A
V
E
WEBSTER AVEUTICA AVE32ND ST XENWOOD AVEYOSEMITE AVE31ST STBRUNSWICK AVEIDAHO AVEQUEBEC AVECP RR
CP
RR
CP RRKENTUCKY AVEGEORGIA AVE29TH ST
3 7 T H S T
27TH ST
2 2N D S T
QUENTIN AVEWAYZATA BLVD
JOPPA AVE37TH ST
36TH ST TEXAS AVE34TH STFLAG A
VE
JERSEY AVEALABAMA AVE2 3 R D S TQUENT I
N AVEFLAG
AVEFORD RDLAKE ST34TH ST
OXFORD ST OTTAWA AVEWO
O
D
D
A
L
E
A
V
E
33RD ST
28TH ST
16TH ST
36TH ST
HUNTINGTON AVE35TH ST
JOPPA AVE26TH ST
27TH ST
ALABA MA AVEEDGEWOOD AVE28TH ST
CEDAR
L
A
K
E
R
D
31ST ST
25TH ST
3 9 T H S T
26TH ST
16T H S T
1ST ST2ND STPARK PLACE BLVDZARTHAN AVEZARTHAN AVETOLEDO AVE
32ND ST
42ND ST
42ND STAQUILA LNGLENHURST AVEBROOK AVEXENWOOD AVEEDGEB
R
O
O
K
D
R
FOREST RD
NEVADA AVE40TH L
N
ELIOT
VI
E
W
R
D
43 1/2 ST
MACKEY AVE40TH S
T
DAKOTA AVEDAKOTA AVESALEM AVELYNN AVELYNN AVE18TH ST
MO
N
T
E
R
E
Y
D
R
V A L L A C H E R A V EWESTWOOD HILLS D R WESTWOODHILLSDR30 1/2 ST
34 1/2 ST
14TH ST
BOONE AVEBOONE AVE
BOONEAVEWEST
M
ORELAND LNUTAH DRQUE
B
E
C
A
V
E
Q UEBEC AVERALEIGH AVERALEIGH AVEX YLON AVEXYLON AVEXYLON AVEXYLON AVEGAMBLE DR
22ND LN
B
R
O
W
N
L
O
W
A
V
E
35 TH STJORDAN AVEDART AVEUTAH AVEUTAH AVEUTAH AVESUMTER AVEBURD
PL
S TANL EN RD
CA
V
E
L
L
AVECAVELL AVECAVELL AVEPARKLANDS RDCOLORADO AVECOLORADO AVECEDAR LAKE AVEKILMER AVEKILMER AVEPARK COM M O N S D R
32 1/2 ST
CEDARWOOD RD
C ED ARWO
O
D
R
D
MEADOWBROOK RDPARKER RD
BLACKSTONE AVEBLACKSTONE AVEBLACKSTONE AVE13TH LN
13TH LN
TAFT AVEWYOMING AVEWYOMING AVEEDGEWOOD AVEEDGEWOOD AVE13 1/2 ST
M
O
NIT
O
R
S
T
FORD LN
RANDAL
L
A
V
E
INDEPENDENCE
A
VEINDEPENDENCE AVEINDEPEND ENCE AVEINDEPENDENCE AVEPA RKWOODS R D
MONTEREY AVEHAMPSHIRE AVEHAMPSHIRE AVE3 3 R D S T
33RD ST 33RD ST NATCHEZ AVENATCHEZ AVENATCHEZ AVEW O L F E PKW Y24TH ST W
OREGON AVEOREGON AVEOREGON AVEREPUBLIC AVEVIRGINIA
A
V
E
VIRGINIA AVEVIRGINIA AV E
VIRGINIA AVEPRINCETON AVEPRINCETON AVEWESTSIDE DR
DECATUR LNYUKON AVEY U KON AVEGETTYSBURGAVEGETTYSBURG AVECAVELL LN
H ILLSBORO AVEH
I
L
LSBORO AVEHILLSBORO AVEHILL SBORO AVEPARKDALE D
RLANCASTERAVE
PHILLIPS PKWYGLENHURST RDC
E
D
A
R LAKE RDHILL LN
DECATURAVEDECATUR AVEM EADOWBROO
K
B
L
VDMEADO
WBROOK
B
L
V
D
GLEN PL
HIG
HWOOD RD
MINNEHAHA C
I
REXCELSIORWAYWOODLAND DRBROOKVIEWDR F
O
R
E
S
T L
N
LOUISIANA CTLNFAIRWAYLN
ENSIGNAVETE X A TONKA AVEWILLOW LNWILLOWLNPRKR24THLN WESTWOOD HILLS CRV
AQUILA CIRBOONECT WESTRIDGE LNMINNEHAHA
CT
TEXAS
CIR
OAK LEAF
CT
FORD
CIR
OTTAWA AVE28TH STAQUILA AVE
31ST
ST
YOSEMI TE AVEAQUILA AVEFLAG AVE31ST ST
C ED AR LA KE RD
24TH S
T
31ST ST
22NDST COLORADO AVE25 1/2 ST
ZARTHAN AVE16TH ST
ALABAMA AVE14TH ST
FLAG AVE16TH ST
1 6 TH ST
26TH
ST
SALEM AVEQUEBEC AVEPENNSYL VANIA AVEZINR AN AVEGLENHURST AVETOLEDO AVE18TH ST
2 3 R D ST
31ST ST
SALEM AVELYNN AVEPENNSYLVANIAAVECOLORADO AVE23RD ST
24TH ST
HUNTINGTON AVE18TH ST
27TH STDAKOTA AVE25TH ST
VERNON AVE41ST ST
29TH STMARYLAND AVE28TH
ST
25TH ST
1 8 T H S T
26TH ST
ID
A
H
ONEVADA AVE24THST
23RD ST
RALE
IGH
AVE
37TH ST
22ND ST
31ST
ST
18TH
KIPLING AVEPENNSYLVANIA AVESUMTER AVE23RD
ST
FRA N K L IN A V E
WEBSTER AVEWEBSTERAVEFLORIDA AVE28TH ST
OTTAWA AVEOTTAWA AVE14TH ST
RHODE ISLAND AVE16TH ST
22 ND ST BRUNSWICK AVE16TH ST
OXFORD ST YOSEMITE AVEJOPPA AVEDAKOTAAVE39TH ST INGLEWOOD AVEFRANKLIN AVE
41ST ST
29TH STWEST END BLVDDUKE DR16TH ST
UTICA AVEExhibit C1
Bikeway CIP .
5-23-2012tw
Legend
Project_Year
2013 - 2015
2016 - 2018
2020 - 2022
Existing Bikeways
Continuation in adjacent City
Grouped
Study Session Meeting of June 11, 2012 (Item No. 5)
Subject: Pedestrian and Bicycle System Implementation Plan and Policy Review Page 9
34TH ST
LAKE S
T
27TH ST
WALKE R ST ALABAMA AVETEXAS AVE44 TH STFLORIDA AVEOXFOR
D
S
T GEORGIA AVEYOSEMITE AVE41ST STIDAHO AVERH ODE ISL AND AVEJERSEY AVEWOODDALE
AVE37TH ST LOUISIANA AVEBNSF RR
EXCELSI
O
R
B
L
V
D
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
L
N
3 5 T H S T
38TH STKENTUCKY AVE39TH ST
CEDAR LAKE R D
VERNON AVEKIPLING AVEWAYZATA B L V D
2 8 T H S T
F O R D R D
INGLEWOOD AVESHELARD PKWY
25 1/2 ST
GORHAM AVEPARK G
L
E
N
R
D
BRUNSWICK AVEBELT LINE BLVDMINN ETON KA BLVD
EXCELSIOR BL
V
D
31ST ST
BROWNDALE AVE16TH ST
HUNTINGTON AVEZARTHAN AVEC
LUB RD
3 6TH S T
23 R D S T
26TH ST
3 6 1/2 STMARYLAND AVEMOR NING SIDE RDZINRAN AVETOLEDO AVEMELROSE AVE32ND ST
UTICA AVENORTH
S
T
42ND ST
DOUGLAS AVE
GLENHURST AVE24TH ST
HAMILT ON ST
XENWOOD AVEWEBSTER AVENEVADA AVEF R A N K LIN AV E
P OWELL RD
VIRGINIA CIR
22ND ST
29TH ST
40TH STDAKOTA AVESALEM AVELYNN AVE25TH S T
BASSWOOD RD18TH STOTTAWA AVE14TH ST
FRANCE AVECAMBRIDGE STQUEBEC AVERALEIGH AVEUTAH AVESUMTER AVEAQUILA AVECOLORADO AVEPENNSYLVA NIA AVEEDGEWOOD AVERIDGE DR
MONTEREY AVEHAMPSHIRE AVE33RD STOREGON AVESUNS ET BLVDCP RRPAR K C E N TER BLVDUTICA AVE35TH ST
18TH ST
AQUI
L
A A
V
E
WEBSTER AVEUTICA AVE32ND ST XENWOOD AVEYOSEMITE AVE31ST STBRUNSWICK AVEIDAHO AVEQUEBEC AVECP RR
CP
RR
CP RRKENTUCKY AVEGEORGIA AVE29TH ST
3 7 T H S T
27TH ST
2 2N D S T
QUENTIN AVEWAYZATA BLVD
JOPPA AVE37TH ST
36TH ST TEXAS AVE34TH STFLAG
A
VE
JERSEY AVEALABAMA AVE2 3 R D S TQUENT
I
N AVEFLA
G
AVEFORD RDLAKE ST34TH ST
OXFORD ST OTTAWA AVEWO
O
D
D
A
L
E
A
V
E
33RD ST
28TH ST
16TH ST
36TH ST
HUNTINGTON AVE35TH ST
JOPPA AVE26TH ST
27TH ST
ALABA MA AVEEDGEWOOD AVE28TH ST
CEDAR
L
A
K
E
R
D
31ST ST
25TH ST
3 9 T H S T
26TH ST
16TH S T
1ST ST2ND STPARK PLACE BLVDZARTHAN AVEZARTHAN AVETOLEDO AVE
32ND ST
42ND ST
42ND STAQUILA LNGLENHURST AVEBROOK AVEXENWOOD AVEEDGEB
R
O
O
K
D
R
FOREST RD
NEVADA AVE40TH L
N
ELIOT
VI
E
W
R
D
43 1/2 ST
MACKEY AVE40TH S
T
DAKOTA AVEDAKOTA AVESALEM AVELYNN AVELYNN AVE18TH ST
MO
N
T
E
R
E
Y
D
R
V A L L A C H E R A V EWESTWOOD HILLS D R WESTWOODHILLSDR30 1/2 ST
34 1/2 ST
14TH ST
BOONE AVEBOONE AVE
BOONEAVEWEST
M
ORELAND LNUTAH DRQUE
B
E
C
A
V
E
Q UEBEC AVERALEIGH AVERALEIGH AVEX YLON AVEXYLON AVEXYLON AVEXYLON AVEGAMBLE DR
22ND LN
B
R
O
W
N
L
O
W
A
V
E
35 TH STJORDAN AVEDART AVEUTAH AVEUTAH AVEUTAH AVESUMTER AVEBURD
PL
STANLE N RD
CA
V
E
L
L
AVECAVELL AVECAVELL AVEPARKLANDS RDCOLORADO AVECOLORADO AVECEDAR LAKE AVEKILMER AVEKILMER AVEPARK COM M O N S D R
32 1/2 ST
CEDARWOOD RD
C ED ARWO
O
D
R
D
MEADOWBROOK RDPARKER RD
BLACKSTONE AVEBLACKSTONE AVEBLACKSTONE AVE13TH LN
13TH LN
TAFT AVEWYOMING AVEWYOMING AVEEDGEWOOD AVEEDGEWOOD AVE13 1/2 ST
M
O
NIT
O
R
S
T
FORD LN
RANDALL
A
V
E
INDEPENDENCE
A
VEINDEPENDENCE AVEINDEPEND ENCE AVEINDEPENDENCE AVEPA RKWOODS R D
MONTEREY AVEHAMPSHIRE AVEHAMPSHIRE AVE3 3 R D S T
33RD ST 33RD ST NATCHEZ AVENATCHEZ AVENATCHEZ AVEW O L F E PKW Y24TH ST W
OREGON AVEOREGON AVEOREGON AVEREPUBLIC AVEVIRGINIA
A
V
E
VIRGINIA AVEVIRGINIA AV E
VIRGINIA AVEPRINCETON AVEPRINCETON AVEWESTSIDE DR
DECATUR LNYUKON AVEY U KON AVEGETTYSBURGAVEGETTYSBURG AVECAVELL LN
H ILLSBORO AVEH
I
L
LSBORO AVEHILLSBORO AVEHILL SBORO AVEPARKDALE D
RLANCASTERAVE
PHILLIPS PKWYGLENHURST RDC
E
D
AR LAKE RDHILL LN
DECATURAVEDECATUR AVEMEADOWBROO
K
B
L
VDMEADO
WBROOK
B
L
V
D
GLEN PL
HIG
HWOOD RD
MINNEHAHA C
I
REXCELSIORWAYWOODLAND
DRBROOKVIEWDR F
O
R
E
S
T L
N
LOUISIANA CTLNFAIRWAYLN
ENSIGNAVETE X A TONKA AVEWILLOW LNWILLOWLNPRKR24THLN WESTWOOD HILLS CRV
AQUILA CIRBOONECT WESTRIDGE LNMINNEHAHA
CT
TEXAS
CIR
OAK LEAF
CT
FORD
CIR
OTTAWA AVE28TH STAQUILA
AVE
31ST
ST
YOSEMI TE AVEAQUILA AVEFLAG AVE31ST ST
C ED AR LAK E RD
24TH S
T
31ST ST
22NDST COLORADO AVE25 1/2 ST
ZARTHAN AVE16TH ST
ALABAMA AVE14TH ST
FLAG AVE16TH ST
1 6 T H ST
26TH
ST
SALEM AVEQUEBEC AVEPENNSYL VANIA AVEZINR AN AVEGLENHURST AVETOLEDO AVE18TH ST
2 3 R D ST
31ST ST
SALEM AVELYNN AVEPENNSYLVANIAAVECOLORADO AVE23RD ST
24TH ST
HUNTINGTON AVE18TH ST
27TH STDAKOTA AVE25TH ST
VERNON AVE41ST ST
29TH STMARYLAND AVE28TH
ST
25TH ST
1 8 T H S T
26TH ST
ID
A
H
ONEVADA AVE24THST
23RD ST
RALE
IGH
AVE
37TH ST
22ND ST
31ST
ST
18TH
KIPLING AVEPENNSYLVANIA AVESUMTER AVE23RD
ST
FRA NK L IN A V E
WEBSTER AVEWEBSTERAVEFLORIDA AVE28TH ST
OTTAWA AVEOTTAWA AVE14TH ST
RHODE ISLAND AVE16TH ST
22 ND ST BRUNSWICK AVE16TH ST
OXFORD ST YOSEMITE AVEJOPPA AVEDAKOTAAVE39TH ST INGLEWOOD AVEFRANKLIN AVE
41ST ST
29TH STWEST END BLVDDUKE DR16TH ST
UTICA AVEExhibit C2
Bikeway CIP .
5-23-2012tw
Legend
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2020
2021
2022
Existing Bikeways
Continuation in adjacent City
By Year
Study Session Meeting of June 11, 2012 (Item No. 5)
Subject: Pedestrian and Bicycle System Implementation Plan and Policy Review Page 10
Meeting Date: June 11, 2012
Agenda Item #: 7
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
2013 – 2018 Solid Waste Collection Program
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
The purpose of this report is to provide Council information relating to the public involvement
process for 2013-2018 residential curbside collection program.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
None at this time. Please let staff know of any comments or questions you might have.
BACKGROUND:
History
On May 14, 2012 staff presented Council:
• a summary of the proposed 2013-2018 single family – 4-plex residential organized
collection program
• a list of materials proposed to be collected curbside with the 2013-2018 residential
collection program compared to high-yielding cities in the United States
• a more detailed list of recyclable materials proposed to be collected curbside with the
2013-2018 residential collection program
• possible Pay-As-You-Throw (PAYT) rate scenarios that provide for organics collection
and provide an economic incentive to reduce garbage and increase recycling
• a brief overview of some of the complexities of collecting plastics, documented health
concerns associated with the manufacture/use/disposal of some plastics and provided some
web links for viewing more related plastics information
• a summary of services/requirements being proposed for multi-family, commercial/
industrial, and schools/churches
Council discussed some of their ideas for changing the program and provided the following
guidance to staff:
• move forward with the 2013-2018 residential curbside program, starting with public
involvement to both inform residents of the proposed changes and get their input – when
completed (late summer) bring the public input on the program back to Council to finalize
the program elements prior to staff preparing of contract Request for Proposals (RFP’s)
• provide the Council with a detailed list of what organic materials will be collected with the
2013-2018 residential curbside program and what materials can be put in backyard
compost bins
• future discussions will be held to determine how to address Council interests associated
with expanding/enhancing solid waste services for multi-family, commercial/industrial, and
schools/religious institutions
• provide Council with additional plastics education / information at a future study session
Study Session Meeting of June 11, 2012 (Item No. 7) Page 2
Subject: 2013 – 2018 Solid Waste Collection Program
Follow up Actions
Based on all of the past Council direction received, staff has done the following:
1. Staff has prepared a public involvement plan to inform residents of proposed program
changes planned for the 2013-2018 single family – 4-plex residential curbside collection
program (Exhibit 1 – Public Involvement Plan for 2013-2018 Residential Program).
2. Staff has prepared a list of organics materials proposed for curbside collection (Exhibit 2 –
Organic Materials - Curbside Collection) and a list of materials acceptable for backyard
composting in St. Louis Park (Exhibit 3 – Organic Materials - Backyard Composting).
Next Steps
Based on Council direction, the following is planned:
1. Staff implements the Public Involvement Plan - Exhibit 1 (attached).
2. Staff will provide Council with additional plastics material education at a future study
session.
3. Staff will review with Council public input related to the proposed 2013 – 2018 residential
organized collection program at a future study session.
4. Staff will provide Council with ideas at a future study session on conducting a stakeholder
process for expanded/enhanced recycling and organics collections for multi-family,
commercial/ industrial, and schools/religious institutions.
Process / Timeline
The current residential refuse/yard waste and recycling collection contracts expire September 30,
2013. New contracts should be awarded before the end of March 2013 to allow contractors time
to adequately prepare for the work. If that deadline cannot be met, extensions of the current
contracts will likely need to be negotiated.
Below is a draft schedule showing major steps necessary to develop and award new collection contracts.
Item Completion Date
Staff / Council review of current & proposed collection program & services Feb - July 2012
Staff informs public of proposed residential collection program & services Jun - Aug 2012
Staff / Council determine future collection program and services Jul - Aug 2012
Staff / Council determine contract and proposal requirements Aug - Sep 2012
Draft contract and RFP completed Sep 2012
Ordinance changes, if any needed, are identified Sep 2012
Ordinance revisions made (if needed) Sep 2012 - Jun 2013
Council authorizes solicitation of proposals Sep - Oct 2012
Proposals received by Staff Nov 2013
Proposals and staff recommendations reviewed with Council Jan 2013
Staff negotiates collection contracts with vendors Jan - Feb 2013
Council approves new collection contracts Mar 2013
Staff conducts public education outreach with residents Apr - Aug 2013
New collection contracts begin Oct 1, 2013
Study Session Meeting of June 11, 2012 (Item No. 7) Page 3
Subject: 2013 – 2018 Solid Waste Collection Program
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
None at this time
VISION CONSIDERATION:
The City’s refuse and recycling activities support or complement the following Strategic
Direction adopted by the City Council.
St. Louis Park is committed to being a leader in environmental stewardship. We will
increase environmental consciousness and responsibility in all areas of city business.
Focus areas:
• Educating staff / public on environmental consciousness, stewardship, and best practices.
• Working in areas such as…environmental innovations.
Attachments: Exhibit 1 – Public Involvement Plan for 2013-2018 Residential Program
Exhibit 2 – Organic Materials - Curbside Collection
Exhibit 3 – Organic Materials - Backyard Composting
Prepared by: Scott Merkley, Public Works Coordinator
Reviewed by: Michael P. Rardin, Director of Public Works
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
Study Session Meeting of June 11, 2012 (Item No. 7) Page 4
Subject: 2013 – 2018 Solid Waste Collection Program
EXHIBIT 1
Public Involvement Plan for
2013-2018 Residential Solid Waste Collection Program
About this Public Involvement Plan:
This plan is designed for the period of time leading up to Council’s awarding of a contract for
Solid Waste Residential Collection Services for the 2013-2018 time period. Once a hauler(s) is
selected by the Council, city staff will embark on a comprehensive communications plan with the
selected hauler(s) to educate the public about any program changes.
Goals
• Publicize the proposed Solid Waste Collection Program changes (particularly focused on
organics & recycling)
• Solicit feedback about proposed changes
• Increase residents’ understanding about the reasons the city plans to make changes to its
program
Objectives
• Create a comprehensive education and public outreach campaign that utilizes several
forms of media, in addition to face-to-face community relations, to reach the largest
number of residents
• Offer residents the opportunity to attend meetings at various times and locations to learn
about the proposed program changes
• Provide at least three informational mailings regarding the proposed changes to all solid
waste customers prior to Council taking final action on a contract
• Create an unscientific online survey related to the proposed program changes
• Gain earned media attention for the proposed program changes in local media
Key Messages
• The St. Louis Park City Council is responding to resident interest and desire for a more
comprehensive solid waste collection program by expanding its recycling program and
introducing organics collection for all single-family through four-plex-sized residences.
• St. Louis Park is putting its Vision in action: St. Louis Park is committed to being a
leader in environmental stewardship. We will increase environmental consciousness and
responsibility in all areas of city business.
• The proposed changes will have long-term benefits for the city and residents alike – with
minimal impact expected on residents’ pocket books.
• The City Council intends to pursue changes in the near future to multi-family,
commercial/industrial and schools/churches to augment the changes to the residential
program.
Study Session Meeting of June 11, 2012 (Item No. 7) Page 5
Subject: 2013 – 2018 Solid Waste Collection Program
Target Audience
• Current residential solid waste customers
Tools
• Public Meetings – The City will conduct several open house style meetings in July and
early August that will feature highlights of the proposed changes, allow for questions and
answers and demonstrate the “impact” (positive) to residents and the community as a
whole of the proposed changes.
• Presentations – City Staff will offer presentations to neighborhood and community
groups about the proposed changes.
• Postcards – The city will conduct a postcard mailing to all current residential customers
announcing the proposed changes, inviting residents to the open house style meetings and
soliciting feedback.
• Park Perspective Newsletter – The August Park Perspective (mailed first week of
August to all households and businesses – approximately 25,000 addresses) will include a
comprehensive overview of the proposed changes and solicit feedback from residents.
• Website – A webpage will be dedicated specifically to the proposed program changes,
including a comparison with our current program, links to the past and future Council
reports on the topic, and a non-scientific online survey designed to provide additional
feedback to the council.
• Social Media – Social media will be used strategically to educate the public about the
proposed changes, solicit feedback, invite attendance to meetings and to highlight the
webpage.
• Video – City staff will use its regularly scheduled programming such as “Park Update” to
provide regular updates about the proposed changes, public meetings, and to solicit
feedback. City staff will also develop public service announcements about the proposed
changes, the opportunities to provide feedback and advertisements of meetings.
• Neighborhood newsletters/websites – City staff will provide written information to be
shared with our neighborhood organizations for their preferred communication networks.
• Signage – The city will utilize posters announcing the proposed changes, meeting dates
and opportunities for feedback in city and community buildings
• Utility Bill Stuffers – All utility customers will receive a “stuffer” announcing the
proposed changes and offering opportunity for feedback
• Media – The city will pitch stories to the Sun-Sailor and Patch, as needed, to highlight
the proposed changes, as well as provide staff written guest columns and blog posts about
the proposed changes.
Study Session Meeting of June 11, 2012 (Item No. 7) Page 6
Subject: 2013 – 2018 Solid Waste Collection Program
EXHIBIT 2
Organic Materials - Curbside Collection
Kitchen Waste
Fruits and vegetables (prepared and raw)
Egg shells
Tea bags/loose tea
Coffee grounds and filters
Herbs and Spices
Bread and baked goods
Cooked grains (rice, pasta, oatmeal)
Flour
Brewery wastes
Dairy products
Meat, fish, bones
Paper Waste
Paper towels and rolls
Toilet paper rolls
Napkins
Egg cartons (paper)
Tissues
Paper plates & cups
Compostable plates, bowls, cups, utensils
Cupcake wrappers (paper)
Cartons (milk, juice, wine)
Pizza boxes
Boxes from frozen & refrigerated foods
Wax paper
Food-soiled Paper
Non-Recyclable Paper
Sugar and flour bags
Household Waste
House plants
Floral trimmings
Floral bouquets
Dryer lint
Nail clippings
Wool
Wine corks (real cork)
Hair (human and pet)
Feathers
Dead insects
Vacuum cleaner bags
Cotton balls
Yard Waste
Only if co-collected with yard waste
Study Session Meeting of June 11, 2012 (Item No. 7) Page 7
Subject: 2013 – 2018 Solid Waste Collection Program
EXHIBIT 3
Organic Materials – Backyard Composting
Kitchen Waste
Fruits and vegetables (raw)
Egg shells (dry)
Tea bags/loose tea
Coffee grounds and filters
Herbs and Spices
Bread and baked goods
Cooked grains (rice, pasta, oatmeal)
Flour
Brewery wastes
Paper Waste
Paper towels and rolls
Toilet paper rolls
Napkins
Egg cartons (paper)
Tissues
Q-tips (cardboard sticks)
Tiny paper scraps
Soiled or wet paper & cardboard
Household Waste
House plants
Floral trimmings
Floral bouquets
Dryer lint
Nail clippings
Wool
Wine corks (real cork)
Hair (human and pet)
Feathers
Dead insects
Yard Waste
Leaves and grass clippings
Straw
Woody plant trimmings (twigs, bark, wood chips)
Non-woody plant trimmings (flowers, houseplants)
Sawdust (untreated/unpainted)
Peat moss
Pine needles and cones
Sod, garden soil and potting mix