HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012/01/23 - ADMIN - Agenda Packets - City Council - Study SessionAGENDA
JANUARY 23, 2012
6:00 p.m. CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION – Westwood Room & Council Chambers
Discussion Items
1. 6:00 p.m. Future Study Session Agenda Planning –February 13, 2012
(WESTWOOD ROOM)
2. 6:05 p.m. 2012 Annual Legislative Update
3. 7:05 p.m. Community Recreation Facility Study with Consultant: Trends in Recreation,
Facilities and Other Gathering Places (COUNCIL CHAMBERS)
4. 9:05 p.m. 2011 Telecommunications Advisory Commission Annual Report
5. 9:10 p.m. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission 2011 Annual Report and 2012
Work Plan
6. 9:15 p.m. Communications/Meeting Check-In (Verbal)
9:20 p.m. Adjourn
Written Reports
7. Update on Prism Dial-A-Ride Program
8. Fourth Quarter Investment Report (October - December, 2011)
9. 2011 Citywide Residential Property Condition Evaluation Program Summary
10. Proposed Allocation of 2012 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds
11. 2011 Annual Housing Programs Report
Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request.
To make arrangements, please call the Administration Department at
952/924-2525 (TDD 952/924-2518) at least 96 hours in advance of meeting.
Meeting Date: January 23, 2012
Agenda Item #: 1
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Future Study Session Agenda Planning – February 13, 2012.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
The City Council and the City Manager to set the agenda for the regularly scheduled Study
Session on February 13, 2012.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Does the Council agree with the agenda as proposed?
BACKGROUND:
At each study session, approximately five minutes are set aside to discuss the next study session
agenda. For this purpose, attached please find the tentative agenda and proposed discussion
items for the regularly scheduled Study Session on February 13, 2012.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
None.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
None.
Attachment: Future Study Session Agenda Planning – February 13, 2012
Prepared by: Debbie Fischer, Office Assistant
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
Study Session Meeting of January 23, 2012 (Item No. 1) Page 2
Subject: Future Study Session Agenda Planning – February 13, 2012
Study Session, February 13, 2012 – 6:30 p.m.
Tentative Discussion Items
1. Future Study Session Agenda Planning – Administrative Services (5 minutes)
2. Beltline Blvd SWLRT Station Area Circulation – Community Development (45 minutes)
Staff will be present to discuss a wide range of transportation alternatives and ideas for the
Beltline Station area to provide better access and circulation.
3. Liquor Licensee Food/Liquor Ratio – Administrative Services (30 minutes)
Staff will provide information on liquor establishments who have not met the ordinance
requirement regarding the food and liquor sales ratio in preparation for the City Councils
consideration of their 2012 liquor license renewal scheduled for February 21.
4. Redistricting – Administrative Services (30 minutes)
Staff will provide basic information on the 2012 Redistricting process, purpose,
requirements, and upcoming Redistricting deadlines.
5. Communications/Meeting Check-In – Administrative Services (5 minutes)
Time for communications between staff and Council will be set aside on every study session
agenda for the purposes of information sharing.
Reports
6. Business Park Zoning District
7. NLC Service Line Warranty Program
8. Community Energy Services Program
9. December 2011 Monthly Financial Report
End of Meeting: 8:40 p.m.
Meeting Date: January 23, 2012
Agenda Item #: 2
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
2012 Annual Legislative Update.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
No formal action requested. Staff has prepared a list of legislative issues for Council’s annual
review and discussion with Senator Ron Latz, Representative Steve Simon, Representative Ryan
Winkler, Hennepin County Commissioner Gail Dorfman, and Metropolitan Council
representative Jim Brimeyer.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Staff has attached a draft of 2012 legislative issues for the Council’s consideration and
discussion with the city’s legislators and representatives.
• Does the Council agree with the legislative issues identified in the attachment regarding
priorities for 2012?
• Is there anything else the City Council would like staff and our legislative delegation to
pursue?
• Does the Council wish to continue retaining legislative consulting assistance for 2012 to
help promote the city’s legislative agenda?
BACKGROUND:
Staff has prepared the attached preliminary list of legislative issues for the discussion with our
legislators and representatives. As has been the case in previous years, as the 2012 legislative
session progresses, additional issues may come to light.
It has been our practice to retain lobbying services to help us with legislative and regulatory
issues. Administrative Services has utilized the legislative services of Doug Franzen and Vic
Moore, Franzen & Associates, and Dennis McGrann and Emily Tranter of Lockridge, Grindal,
and Nauen. Staff requests direction as to continuing on with these services for 2012.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
Funding for our lobbyists is included in the EDA budget.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Promoting regional transportation issues and securing transportation funding is aligned with the
Council’s Strategic Direction of being a Connected and Engaged Community.
Attachments: 2012 Legislative Issues and Priorities (Draft)
Prepared by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
Study Session Meeting of January 23, 2012 (Item No. 2) Page 2
Subject: 2012 Annual Legislative Update
City of St. Louis Park
2012 Legislative Issues and Priorities
1. TH 100 Full Build Project
Purpose: To keep the TH 100 Full Build Project funded and on track for its proposed 2014 bid
letting date.
Status: The TH 100 project is among several other identified “expansion” projects in the metro
area that have been “rescoped”. This past year Mn/DOT and the City held various community
meetings to develop a final preferred concept for this project.
This rescoped project is a smaller, less complicated and less costly concept than originally
proposed by MnDOT. This revised project no longer requires removing the 22 residences along
Toledo Street north of Minnetonka Blvd. However, it appears the Holiday gas station property at
Minnetonka Blvd and Vernon Ave will be severely impacted by this project. Mn/DOT is
currently conducting an operational analysis, drainage study, and a noise study to verify the new
concept is viable. It appears the revised configuration will cost approximately $60 million,
which is less than half of the original estimated project cost.
The current schedule identified by Mn/DOT for this project is as follows:
• Conduct noise study and NAC meetings October 2011 - April 2012
• Traffic Modeling / Operational Analysis review December 2011 - February 2012
by City and County
• Preliminary Water Resources Design December 2011 - April 2012
• Mn/DOT Staff Approves Geometric Layout February 2012
• Mn/DOT Public Open House March 2012
• Final Geometric Layout approved April 2012
• Municipal Consent Approval Process May - July 2012
• Mn/DOT Develops Construction Plans Summer/Fall 2012 – Sept. 2014
and Specifications
• Right of Way Acquisition May 2013 - September 2014
• Mn/DOT Opens Bids and Awards Contract November 2014
• Construction 2015 thru 2017
Background:
The 2006 interim project added a third lane in each direction by decreasing lane widths from 12
feet to 11 feet and eliminating or severely reducing shoulders along that stretch of highway. The
third lane is required for the full build project so that MnDOT can keep a minimum of two lanes
open in each direction during construction.
Improvements not included as a part of the interim project include construction of the noise
walls, which MnDOT agreed to construct no later than 2015, expansion of lane widths,
construction of on/off ramps, and bridge and storm water improvements. Bridges spanning TH
100 at Hwy 7 and Hwy 5, and storm sewers conveyance systems have no more than 10-15 years
of useful life left and are deteriorating.
Study Session Meeting of January 23, 2012 (Item No. 2) Page 3
Subject: 2012 Annual Legislative Update
2. Grade Separated Crossing Project at Highway 7 & Louisiana Avenue
Purpose: To secure approximately $5 million in funding to allow for the construction of a $25
million grade separated intersection (interchange) at Highway 7 and Louisiana Avenue.
Status:
The project is currently being re-programmed for 2013 construction, and would provide for a
grade separated interchange. This project will not only mitigate congestion and accidents at the
intersection itself, but will accommodate further growth and redevelopment in the immediate
area, including expansion at Methodist Hospital, a future nearby light rail station, and other
adjacent redevelopment activity.
The City of St. Louis Park has received a $7.63 million grant from the Metropolitan Council and
Transportation Advisory Board in accordance with the federal Surface Transportation Program
(STP) for the construction of this grade separated crossing. In accordance with grant
requirements, the City is required to provide a local match to the STP funds noted above in the
amount of $2,398,000. In addition, Mn/DOT has committed $594,000 to the project through its
Cooperative Agreement program and $1,000,000 through its Access Management program. The
city is currently requesting a one year extension to the 2012 federal funding sunset; if this is not
granted by the Met Council, the City likely will lose all of the STP and Mn/DOT funding
described above. Securing this extension and the remaining funding for this project is critical.
Background: The city owns most of the property or right-of-way in all four quadrants of the
intersection. The city has undertaken significant design work for this project and has narrowed
the design concepts down to one. The Environmental Assessment process and Preliminary
Design activities were completed for the project in late 2011. Final design is underway with plan
completion and right-of-way acquisition completion expected by late 2012. If an extension to
the current grants is approved, all final project documents will needto be submitted to Mn/DOT
and FHWA for approval and bid authorization no later than March 31, 2013.
3. I-394/TH 100 Collector-Distributor Roads
Purpose: To secure $1.8 million of a required $2.4 million to make improvements to the
eastbound and westbound lanes of the TH 100 Commuter-Distributor Road at I-394.
Status: The cities of Golden Valley and St. Louis Park, in partnership with Mn/DOT, have been
working to find a solution to the congestion and flow of traffic in the vicinity TH 100 and I-394.
This project is supported by Mn/DOT but is not in their current list of projects due to funding
constraints.
Background: The Trunk Highway 100 & Interstate 394/Xenia Avenue/Park Place Boulevard
Collector-Distributor Road Improvement Project will benefit residents in St. Louis Park and the
metropolitan region by improving the safety of the east and west bound traffic flow on I-394 and
in the vicinity of Park Place and Xenia Avenue, as well as on TH 100.
The traffic analysis indicates that the TH 100 Collector-Distributor (C-D) Road currently
operates poorly in the eastbound and westbound directions during the morning and evening peak
Study Session Meeting of January 23, 2012 (Item No. 2) Page 4
Subject: 2012 Annual Legislative Update
periods. Further analysis for year 2027 conditions indicate operations will continue to worsen
based on normal growth of regional trips to a service level of E-F.
To mitigate for this, an additional eastbound and westbound lane on the TH 100 C-D Road needs
to be constructed to bring this area into acceptable levels of service.
4. Southwest Light Rail Transit
The Met Council has requested and the Governor has included $25 million for SWLRT in the
proposed 2012 State bonding bill. This is critical matching funds for moving forward with the
SWLRT project and the City of St Louis Park supports this request. Preliminary Engineering is
scheduled to begin this spring. The Met Council anticipates the SWLRT project cost for 2012 is
$52.6 million. Ultimately the SWLRT project needs matching funds from the State in the total
amount of $125 million or 10% of the $1.25 billion total estimated project cost. The Met
Council anticipates requesting the rest of the State matching funds, $95 million, in 2013.
5. Private Well Drilling
HF 135 / SF 64 were introduced in the 2011 session. This legislation would prevent cities from
regulating the construction or use of private wells within municipal water utility service
boundaries. The state has continued to place requirements on public water supply providers to
add drinking water treatment and testing, to restrict the volume of water used, and to increase the
cost of water use through fees and requirements on utility rate structures (tiered rates). As a
result, some water users are choosing to obtain all or portions of their water from wells they
place on their own property. This creates risks to public health and safety, can affect the
surrounding environment, can affect city water supplies, and can leave city water utilities with
massive losses of customer load and rate revenue. Providing clean, safe drinking water to
citizens is an essential service provided by 726 active municipal water systems. Private wells in
a city increase the risk of contaminating public water supplies and encourages over use of water.
The city and the League of Minnesota Cities supports current law that authorizes cities to protect
public health and safety through local controls regulating or prohibiting private wells being
placed within municipal water utility service boundaries and would oppose any changes to law to
remove that authority.
6. Transportation or Sidewalk Utility
Successful economic development efforts and community stability are dependent upon a city’s
ability to make infrastructure investments. Current infrastructure funding options available to
cities are inadequate and unsustainable. Funding pressures have been exacerbated in the past by
levy limits, unallotments, and reductions in the local government aid and market value
homestead credit programs. The existing special assessment law, Minn. Stat. ch. 429, does not
meet cities’ financing needs because of the benefit requirement. The law requires a minimum of
20 percent of such a project to be specially assessed against affected properties. In practice,
however, proof of increased property value to this degree of benefit can rarely be proven from
regular repair or replacement of existing infrastructure such as streets or sidewalks. Alternatives
to the Minn. Stat. ch. 429 methods for financing infrastructure improvements are nearly
nonexistent. The Legislature has given cities the authority to operate utilities for waterworks,
sanitary sewers, and storm sewers. The storm sewer authority, established in 1983, set the
precedent for a workable process of charging a use fee on a utility bill for a city service
infrastructure that is of value to everyone in a city. Similar to the storm sewer authority, a
Study Session Meeting of January 23, 2012 (Item No. 2) Page 5
Subject: 2012 Annual Legislative Update
transportation or sidewalk utility would use technical, well-founded measurements and would
equitably distribute the costs of local infrastructure services. The Legislature should allow cities
to create, as a local option, additional utilities such as a transportation or sidewalk utility. Such
authority would acknowledge the effects of repeated levy limits and the general funding shift
from the state to local governments for building and maintaining necessary infrastructure.
7. Levy Limits
During the 2008 legislative session, levy limits were imposed on cities over 2,500 population for
three years (2009 -2011). Levy limits replace local accountability with a state judgment about the
appropriate level of local taxation and local services. Additionally, state restrictions on local
budgets can have a negative effect on a city’s bond rating due to the restriction on revenue
flexibility. Levy limits are currently not in place for 2012 and the City would ask legislative
support for not imposing a levy limit provision for future years.
8. Fiscal Disparities
The City has been a net contributor (also known as a fiscal disparities “loser”) to the fiscal
disparities pool for some time. Given extensive redevelopment and stronger commercial/industrial
property values than most other metro area communities, the City’s contribution to the fiscal
disparities pool has increased substantially.
Below are some statistics related to St. Louis Park which denotes the increase in the City’s net
contribution over the years:
Pay 2009 1,635,724 Net Contribution
Pay 2010 1,231,482 Net Contribution
Pay 2011 2,775,483 Net Contribution
Pay 2012 3,220,881 Net Contribution
From 2009 to 2012… 96.9% Contribution Increase for St. Louis Park
From 2010 to 2012… 161.5% Contribution Increase
From 2011 to 2012… 16.0% Contribution Increase
Other cities which are also net contributors have much lesser rates of change for the 2009 - 2012
timeframe:
Bloomington -13.7% Net Contribution Change
Eden Prairie - 5.7% Net Contribution Change
Edina + 1.7% Net Contribution Change
Maple Grove + 2.3% Net Contribution change
Minnetonka +13.3% Net Contribution Change
Plymouth - 8.0% Net Contribution change
St. Louis Park +96.9% Net Contribution Change
The City’s tax rate is higher due to reduced Net Tax Capacity. From 2011 to 2012 the change is
$445,398, or an increase of 16.05% from 2011. This creates additional burdens on local property
tax payers to pay for local services.
In 2010, legislation was passed to require an analysis of the fiscal disparities program. The study
is being conducted by the Commissioner of Revenue and is due February 12, 2012.
Study Session Meeting of January 23, 2012 (Item No. 2) Page 6
Subject: 2012 Annual Legislative Update
9. Legal notices – eliminate requirement for paid publication
The City continues to support the elimination of requirements to print ads for “proceedings,
official notices, and summaries” in local newspapers. Bills addressing this issue have been
introduced during recent sessions. Last year, House File 162 called for allowing political
subdivisions (cities, counties, school boards, etc.) to replace the print ads with a single annual
notice stating that all such notices would appear on the political subdivision’s website (i.e. the
city website). In addition to saving the cities thousands of dollars in annual publishing costs, the
notices would have the potential to reach a much greater audience than they currently do in St.
Louis Park, where the local newspaper only reaches about half of the community. In addition,
businesses working with the city or bidding on city projects find it cumbersome to monitor many
different publications.
10. Railroad Stormwater Fee Exemption
A bill that would exempt railroads from any levy, special assessment, or charge related to storm
sewers was introduced in the 2011 session. The legislation would set railroads apart from all
other property owners, including the federal government and tax-exempt properties such as
churches, when it comes to paying a portion of the cost of federal stormwater management
mandate compliance. Many cities, including St. Louis Park, rely on stormwater utility fees to
operate their stormwater systems and to meet federal and state mandates aimed at water quality
improvements. The city and the League of Minnesota Cities oppose legislation and policies that
disproportionately shift authority, costs and/or liability away from railroad companies and onto
other entities. Railroads must be required to pay for improvements that benefit their properties.
The city and the League of Minnesota Cities opposed this legislation in 2011 and will do so
again in 2012.
Meeting Date: January 23, 2012
Agenda Item #: 3
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Community Recreation Facility Study with Consultant: Trends in Recreation, Facilities and
Other Gathering Places.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
No formal action at this time.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Does the trends information presented at the Study Session provide the Council with any
direction they want to share with the Community Recreation Task Force?
BACKGROUND:
At the November 28, 2011, Study Session the City Council provided feedback on the tour
recently conducted of three community centers and the makeup and formation of a task force to
assist the City Council with this issue. At the December 12, 2011 Study Session, Council
authorized staff to advertise and accept application forms for a task force. Council also gave
approval to have an expert in the field update them on trends in the Parks and Recreation field.
As facility planning moves forward, we need to be thinking towards the future with an
understanding of our changing demographics.
On January 17 the Council appointed members to sit on the Community Recreation Task Force.
One of the elements we need to keep in mind as we move forward with future planning is that as
baby boomers age, they will want very different facilities than the “senior center” models used in
the past. Ellen O’Sullivan, a well-known expert in the area of Parks and Recreation trends, will
be present to talk to the Council, staff and task force.
PRESENTATION OF TRENDS INFORMATION
Dr. Ellen O’Sullivan will present information about trends and emerging directions that
influence facilities and gathering places in the future. She has researched the demographics from
the recent census and will discuss how St. Louis Park relates to others in the state of Minnesota
and nationally. The attachments provided by Ellen will provide you with some information prior
to the study session. She will be using the information in the attachments in her presentation. In
attendance at the study session will be the recently appointed Task Force members, PRAC,
Community Education staff and City Staff. The study session will consist of a presentation as
well as discussion.
ABOUT DR. ELLEN O’SULLIVAN:
Dr. Ellen O’Sullivan’s extended career has included being a camp counselor, a community
recreation director, a university professor, and organizational facilitator for public parks and
recreation. She is the author of two books on marketing for parks and recreation and two
additional books on the values and benefits of parks and recreation and serves as a trend
consultant for several state and local organizations.
Study Session Meeting of January 23, 2012 (Item No. 3) Page 2
Subject: Community Rec Facility Study: Trends in Recreation, Facilities & Other Gathering Places
Interacting with community residents, decision-makers, and staff is one of her favorite pursuits
and she has most recently worked with those groups in the City of Cincinnati, OH; El Paso, TX;
Eagan, MN; Newington, CT; and La Palma, CA.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
Staff coordinated with the state Minnesota Recreation and Parks Association (MRPA) to have
Ellen speak to other professions in the area on Tuesday, January 24. Ellen will also be speaking
to students and professors at the University of Minnesota Mankato on Wednesday, January 25.
The cost will be shared with MRPA and the University. Staff included this fee in the budget per
Council direction.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
This is directly related to the results of Vision St. Louis Park and one of the adopted Strategic
Directions that “St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged community” and
the related Focus Area of “Exploring creation of a multi-use civic center, including indoor/winter
use”.
Attachments: Trends and Emerging Directions
Signs of Shifts
Prepared by: Cindy S. Walsh, Director of Parks and Recreation
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
Study Session Meeting January 23, 2012 (Item No. 3)
Subject: Community Rec Facility Study: Trends in Recreation, Facilities & Other Gathering Places Page 3
Study Session Meeting January 23, 2012 (Item No. 3)
Subject: Community Rec Facility Study: Trends in Recreation, Facilities & Other Gathering Places Page 4
Study Session Meeting January 23, 2012 (Item No. 3)
Subject: Community Rec Facility Study: Trends in Recreation, Facilities & Other Gathering Places Page 5
Meeting Date: January 23, 2012
Agenda Item #: 4
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
2011 Telecommunications Advisory Commission Annual Report.
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
None at this time. This report is being provided to the City Council for review and comment.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Are the actions of the TAC in alignment with Council expectations?
Does the Council have further directions or modifications to the proposed work plan?
Does the City Council wish to meet with representatives of the TAC at a future study session?
BACKGROUND:
The Telecommunications Advisory Commission officially met six times in 2011 and
Commissioners remained involved in other ways including:
• Commissioners Keeler and Browning participated in two subcommittees for the Fiber
Optic Study and Future of Cable TV.
• Commissioners Dworsky, Hartman and Keeler attended the MACTA annual conference
in October, and Commissioner Keeler was elected to the MACTA Board.
Fiber Optic Study
The Fiber Optic Study Task Force was managed by Chief Information Officer Clint Pires, who
recruited candidates from the community in addition to Commissioners Keeler and Browning
and Community TV Coordinator John McHugh. A Request for Qualifications was issued in
May, 2011. After reviewing the responses and interviewing two firms, the Task Force selected
Columbia Telecommunications Corporation (CTC) to do the study.
Future of cable television subcommittees
This subcommittee included Commissioners Browning and Keeler, CIO Clint Pires,
Communications Coordinator Jamie Zwilling and Civic TV Coordinator Reg Dunlap. The
subcommittee reviewed a variety of trade journal articles and other research and met several
times during the summer and fall, and consulted with two telecommunications experts about
trends and expectations related to communication technology and policy. Commissioner Keeler
created line graphs of various Comcast revenue sources to help identify which were predictable
and which were volatile. A detailed staff report was provided to Council at the November 28,
2011, Study Session and Council provided helpful feedback. Councilmember Finkelstein said
he’s concerned that technology changes could cause franchise fees to drop. The Council
indicated its support for ongoing video services even if there is no franchise after 2021, and is
very interested in remaining ahead of the technology curve. The Council indicated it was very
interested in the Fiber Optic Study and any other proactive suggestions the Commission can
make. It was suggested that instead of consolidating channels to simplify branding, that one
channel could be used by the new Convention and Visitors Bureau.
Study Session Meeting of January 23, 2012 (Item No. 4) Page 2
Subject: 2011 Telecommunications Advisory Commission Annual Report
Park TV/School District #283 Operations Agreement & related activities
Park TV covered a full schedule of high school sports throughout the year, concerts and events,
and used the studio weekly to record Park Update and some Community TV productions, and
provided live School Board coverage twice per month.
Comcast audit notice
The Commission discussed the results from the past few cable company audits and decided to
postpone further discussion until May, 2012.
Grand Stadium
After reviewing the Grand Stadium proposal at several meetings, the Commission voted to table
discussion until February, 2012, with the caveat that the City could take appropriate action to
cover games if necessary. Grand Stadium is affiliated with local broadcast channel 45 (KSTC),
which is the rights-holder for television coverage of high school sports sectional playoffs. Grand
Stadium requests a signed agreement from local cable producers like Park TV that cover high
school sports to partner in DVD sales and live coverage. However some local producers have
objected to terms of the agreement and few have signed it.
Comcast Complaints
The total number of complaint calls dropped to 48 in 2011 after 50 in 2010, significantly lower
than the 76 received in 2009 (attached). Most complaints were quickly resolved after being
referred to Comcast E-Care staff.
Comcast introduced a customer service guarantee in October 2009 that has helped reduce the
number of complaint calls. The guarantee says:
• We will give you a 30-day, money-back guarantee on all our services.
• We will treat you and your home with courtesy and respect.
• We will answer your questions at your convenience.
• We will offer easy-to-understand packages and provide you with a clear bill.
• We will continually offer the best and most video choices.
• We will quickly address any problem you experience.
• We will schedule appointments at your convenience and be mindful of your time.
Officers
Mike Mulligan served as Chair and Rolf Peterson as Vice Chair for 2011.
Telecommunications Commission Attendance: 2011
Commissioner 2/10/11
5/19/11 7/14/11 8/25/11
Special
Meeting
10/6/11 12/15/11 Total
Attended
Mike Mulligan (Chair) YES YES YES - YES YES 5
Rolf Peterson(Vice Chair) YES YES YES YES - YES 5
Bruce Browning - YES - YES YES YES 4
Rick Dworsky YES YES - YES YES YES 5
Dale Hartman YES YES YES YES - YES 5
Toby Keeler YES YES YES YES YES YES 6
Bill Theobald - YES - - YES - 2
Jenna Sheldon (Youth) YES - 1
Note: Jenna Sheldon’s term expired at the end of the school year in 2011 and she did not reapply.
Study Session Meeting of January 23, 2012 (Item No. 4) Page 3
Subject: 2011 Telecommunications Advisory Commission Annual Report
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
None
VISION CONSIDERATION:
This report supports the strategic direction – St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected
and engaged community.
Attachment: Cable TV Complaints Received & Logged by City Staff 2007-2011
Telecommunications Advisory Commission Work Plan 2012
Prepared by: Reg Dunlap, Civic TV Coordinator
Reviewed by: Jamie Zwilling, Communications Coordinator
Through: Clint Pires, Chief Information Officer
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
Study Session Meeting of January 23, 2012 (Item No. 4) Page 4
Subject: 2011 Telecommunications Advisory Commission Annual Report
Cable TV Complaints Received & Logged by City Staff 2007-2011
(Some customers reported more than one complaint.)
COMPLAINT CATEGORY Complaints
2007
Complaints
2008
Complaints
2009
Complaints
2010
Complaints
2011
Billing 19 30 28 17 21
Construction (e.g., right of way,
unburied cable, property
damage)
0 2 3 0 6
Customer Service/ Relations
(e.g., missed or late
appointments, company
response to issue, attitude)
8 7 0 7 1
Installation (e.g., property
damage)
0 0 0 0 0
Programming Options (lost
channels, want new channels)
27 16 6 2 2
Rates, prices 22 16 7 9 6
Technical Service (e.g., outage,
reception, equipment faulty/lack
of features)
3 15 10 14 12
Service Requests (e.g.,
residential/commercial)
0 0 0 0 0
Telephone Customer Service
(on hold, busy, no one
available)
10 9 8 8 6
Miscellaneous 8 9 14 11 3
Total Cable Service
Complaints
97 99 76 68 57
Digital Voice/Telephone 2 3 2 3 2
Cable Modem/Internet Issues 13 6 3 7 2
Combined Total of All
Processed Complaints
(includes Telephone & Internet)
112 108 81 78 61
Average complaints per month
reported to city staff
9.3 9.8 6.75 6.5 5.1
Total complaint calls
(some callers mention more
than 1 complaint)
85 83 76 50 48
Approx number of subscribers
on average for the year
13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000
Study Session Meeting of January 23, 2012 (Item No. 4) Page 5
Subject: 2011 Telecommunications Advisory Commission Annual Report
2012 Telecommunications Advisory Commission Work Plan
January 2012
Written Annual Report to City Council
February 29 Council Chambers
• Grand Stadium review
• Review budget for 2011 & 2012
May 9 Council Chambers
• Consider franchise fee audit notice, going back 3 years from the date of the notice
• Fiber optic study update
August 22
• Fiber optic study update
October 10
• Comcast customer service update
• Future of cable TV technology update
December 12
• Comcast presentation on new cable rates and/or changes in the channel line up
• Draft Annual Report for 2012
• Set meetings for 2013
• Draft Work Plan for 2013
• Elect Chair & Vice Chair, effective next meeting
Meeting Date: January 23, 2012
Agenda Item #: 5
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission 2011 Annual Report and 2012 Work Plan.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
This report summarizes work performed by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission
(“PRAC”) in 2011 and outlines the intentions of PRAC for work to be performed in 2012.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Are the actions of the PRAC in alignment with the expectations of the City Council?
Does the City Council wish to meet with PRAC to discuss the annual report and work plan?
BACKGROUND:
The Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission considers matters pertaining to long-range park
and recreation plans and may offer recommendations in new development areas in relation to
park and recreation space. The City Council may request the Commission to study and advise on
other related items. The Commission consists of seven regular members and one voting youth
member. Meetings are held the third Wednesday of each month at 6:30 p.m.
In accordance with Council policy, the 2011 Year End Report and 2012 Work Plan are attached
in full for City Council review.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
The 2012 PRAC Work Plan addresses participation in several focus areas of the Vision Process
including being a connected and engaged community; being a leader in environmental
stewardship; and promoting and integrating arts, culture and community aesthetics in all city
initiatives.
Attachments: Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission 2011 Year End Report
Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission 2012 Work Plan
Prepared by: Stacy Voelker, Administrative Secretary
Reviewed by: Cindy Walsh, Director of Parks and Recreation
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
Study Session Meeting of January 23, 2012 (Item No. 5) Page 2
Subject: Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission 2011 Annual Report and 2012 Work Plan
Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission (“PRAC”)
2011 Year End Report
The Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Purpose:
The Commission shall study and consider all phases of public parks and recreation and
recommend to the City of St. Louis Park and Independent School District #283 a park and public
recreation program which best meets the needs of all residents of St. Louis Park.
2011 Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission
Christina Barberot, City Representative, Chair
Tom Worthington, City Representative, Vice Chair
James Beneke, School Representative
Sophia Flumerfelt, Student Representative
George Foulkes, School Representative
George Hagemann, City Representative
Steve Hallfin, City Representative
Kirk Hawkinson, City Representative
Parks and Recreation Department Staff
Cindy Walsh, Director
Rick Beane, Park Superintendent
Rick Birno, Recreation Superintendent
Mark Oestreich, Westwood Hills Nature Center Manager
Craig Panning, Manager of Buildings and Structures
Jim Vaughan, Environmental Coordinator
Stacy Voelker, Administrative Secretary
2011 Highlights
Youth Association and city organization representatives attended Commission meetings and
provided updates from their associations or organizations. Ideas to foster better relationships
with participants, other associations and the city were also discussed. In 2011, the Commission
met with Friends of the Arts, Kids around the World, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, the
Historical Society, Soccer Association and the Football Association.
Following a presentation by a representative from “Kids around the World”, the Commission
recommended staff to partake in the program by donating old playground equipment. The
program removes old playground equipment tagged to be replaced, renovates it and ships it to
poorer areas or countries at no expense to the City. The playground equipment is then replaced
by new equipment that was budgeted for in the Capital Improvement Program.
Commission members reviewed the Minnehaha Creek corridor and the potential expanding of
the corridor to provide additional green space around the creek from Meadowbrook to Louisiana
Avenue. The annual Minnehaha Creek cleanup was held on Saturday, May 21 (rescheduled from
April 16). The Commission and other volunteers cleaned up the creek area by the MSC and
Creekside Park.
Study Session Meeting of January 23, 2012 (Item No. 5) Page 3
Subject: Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission 2011 Annual Report and 2012 Work Plan
Commission members visited the idea of installing artificial turf in the High School stadium at
the same time Benilde-St. Margaret’s school added it to their field. In response to the inquiry
staff conducted a turf feasibility study. Staff and members continued to discuss and included
questions on turf in the Community Recreation Study conducted in January of 2011.
The Community Recreation Study, created to obtain feedback from the community on what
residents would like to see included in St. Louis Park, was presented in January of 2011.
Following the results of the survey, the Commission, along with Council, toured three
community centers in nearby cities.
Commission members continue to review and discuss art pieces and proposals throughout the
city.
Throughout the year, staff presented and discussed Capital Improvement Projects with the
Commission.
Study Session Meeting of January 23, 2012 (Item No. 5) Page 4
Subject: Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission 2011 Annual Report and 2012 Work Plan
2012 Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission
Tom Worthington, City Representative, Chair
George Hagemann, City Representative, Vice Chair
James Beneke, School Representative
Sophia Flumerfelt, Student Representative
George Foulkes, School Representative
Kirk Hawkinson, City Representative
Vacant, City Representative
Vacant, City Representative
2012 Goals
Adult Fitness areas: Council requested the Commission research potential outdoor adult
playground / fitness stations.
Athletic Association Relationship: Invite each association to their monthly meetings to
continue a positive relationship.
Community Education Advisory Commission (CEAC): Host a joint meeting with CEAC
to explore common goals.
Commissions: Meet with other commissions as appropriate.
Community Recreation Facility: Involvement in the ongoing exploration of a city
recreation facility(s).
Environmental Stewardship: Connect people in the community with emphasis on
environmental items such as organizing the annual Minnehaha Creek Clean up and buckthorn
removal. Discuss environmental issues as they arise.
Park User Group Relationship: Assist in facilitating interested groups and other park and
recreation users (i.e. Friends of the Arts, Off-Leash Dog Park users, Historical Society, etc.).
Police Advisory Commission: Jointly explore projects such as smoking in the park ban,
standardize rules for bike crossings, keeping park restrooms open, etc. [Mr. Hagemann,
Spokesperson]
Recreation Resources: Invite Council to participate in exploring the city’s recreation
resources via a bike ride.
Staff Appreciation Luncheon: Serve an appreciation luncheon for staff.
Trails and Sidewalks: Be involved in the further study and exploration of the expansions of
trails and sidewalks in the City to further the desires of the residents as stated in the
Community Recreation Study.
2012 Parks and Recreation Advisory
Commission Work Plan
Meeting Date: January 23, 2012
Agenda Item #: 6
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Communications/Meeting Check-In (Verbal).
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Not Applicable.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Not Applicable.
BACKGROUND:
At every Study Session, verbal communications will take place between staff and Council for the
purpose of information sharing.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
Not Applicable.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Not Applicable.
Attachments: None
Prepared and Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
Meeting Date: January 23, 2012
Agenda Item #: 7
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Update on Prism Dial-A-Ride Program.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
No action at this time. This report is intended to provide an update on this new service in
preparation for the Councils consideration on February 6 to extend the contract with PRISM
(People Responding in Social Ministry) to provide door-to-door, dial-a-ride services to all
residents of St. Louis Park through December 31, 2012,
POLICY CONSIDERATION
The City entered into a six month contract with Prism on September 1, 2011 to provide Dial-a-
Ride transportation services to St. Louis Park residents. Previous to entering into this contract,
St. Louis Park was served by several transportation programs, each operating independently and
with various limitations. The policy consideration is whether or not the City Council wishes to
continue to support Prism’s Dial-a-Ride program to enhance the level of transportation services
available for SLP residents.
BACKGROUND:
City s taff and Courtney Whited, Prism Transportation Coordinator, met with the Council in July
2011 to discuss Prism’s proposed plan to expand their door-to-door Dial-a-Ride program to St.
Louis Park. Council supported the proposal and the potential benefits that a flexible
transportation program would provide and directed staff to proceed with the steps necessary to
enter into a contract with Prism to provide Dial-a-Ride services to St. Louis Park residents. The
City agreed to provide up to a $10,000 funding contribution to cover program costs for the initial
six month period of September 1, 2011 through February 28, 2012. It was understood that
following the first six months of operation staff would evaluate the program’s operation and its
ability to serve the transportation needs of St. Louis Park residents. Upon review of this
information with the Council, the intent was to determine whether to continue funding the
program for 2012.
Who is Prism? Prism is a community funded social service agency that provides families in need
with food, financial assistance, transportation and other services in times of financial hardships.
Programs include a food shelf, financial assistance, school supplies, employment and budget
counseling, home maintenance, referral services and transportation. Their mission is “To walk
alongside families providing support-based programs that encourage self-sufficiency”.
For over 35 years, the volunteers and staff at Prism have helped families stabilize their
immediate crisis and then continued to work with them; counseling, educating and goal-setting to
empower them to take an active role in their own solutions.
Description of Prism Dial-a-Ride Service. The Dial-a-Ride services include transportation to
any destination in the cities of St. Louis Park, Golden Valley, Robbinsdale, Crystal, New Hope,
Brooklyn Center and eastern Plymouth. Services are also provided to public transit stops
connecting riders for travel outside the service area.
Study Session Meeting of January 23, 2012 (Item No. 7) Page 2
Subject: Update on Prism Dial-A-Ride Program
Rider eligibility for the service is not restricted by age or income and is accessible for mobility
impaired riders. Riders are asked to pay a $3.00 fee per one-way trip and there is no limit on the
number of trips taken per week. This is an on demand service and riders need to call at least
three business days in advance to schedule a ride. Prism operates on a 1 hour pick-up window
although the driver will call the rider when he/she is 10 minutes away. The vehicles used are
handicapped accessible. The hours of operation for this transportation service are Monday
through Friday, 8AM to 4PM.
Ridership Statistics: September through December 2011. Prism began providing services to St.
Louis Park residents in September. Marketing efforts included articles in the Sun Sailor, the
Park Perspective and announcements on the City’s web site. Prism staff also did direct outreach
to Lenox, Park Nicollet, STEP, and the faith community.
After providing 142 rides the first month of service, the number of rides dropped down to 121
the second month and has been slowly climbing since. In December, 159 rides were provided.
The number of unduplicated riders monthly has averaged 13 and a total of 28 individuals have
used the service since September.
Prism has indicated that the majority of the riders are seniors that are seeking a more attentive
service than what they would receive from an alternate transportation service. The door-to-door
Dial-a-Ride service is more direct than many services and has the feel of running an errand. A
ride to and from the store only takes 15 to 25 minutes each way versus 1 – 2 hours on metro
mobility or the bus. The service is more similar to taxi cab service. The number one ride
destination was to adult day care. Other destinations included medical appointments, work,
shopping and social service appointments.
Prism has indicated that typically ridership will continue to grow each month as more residents
hear about the service. In other communities they have seen a threefold increase in riders within
a year of implementing the program. Prism has done a significant amount of outreach and will
be undertaking more direct marketing in February. Prism also has two new buses that will be
going into service at the end of this month. These buses with their updated logo will provide a
presence in the community that will also contribute to marketing the program.
Staff Recommendation. Based on the first four months of ridership, the Dial-a-ride service is
showing consistent and increasing use. Seniors, the targeted ridership population, are the
primary users of the service. Prism has stated that they anticipate ridership will continue to grow
as word of mouth spreads about the program. Extension of the contract through the end of year
will provide an opportunity to better assess the long term and ongoing use of the program. Staff
is recommending that we continue funding the service through the end of 2012 at which time
program operation and ridership can be assessed and the Council can determine whether to
continue funding the program beyond 2012.
Next Steps. Extension of the contract for services with Prism will be brought to the February 6
Council meeting for City Council consideration. Upon receiving Council approval, staff will
prepare the necessary agreement for the City to participate in Prism’s dial-a-ride program
through December 31, 2012. The agreement will include an option for the City to provide
continued funding for the program for 2013 contingent upon Council approval. Staff will review
the program’s performance through the initial year of operation and provide an update to the
Council and a determination regarding continued funding in 2013.
Study Session Meeting of January 23, 2012 (Item No. 7) Page 3
Subject: Update on Prism Dial-A-Ride Program
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
The City’s 2012 budget includes up to $20,000 in funding for a Dial-a-Ride program. PRISM
Express estimates that the full cost of a one way ride is $11.50. PRISM bills the City monthly on
a per ride basis. The City reimburses PRISM at a rate of $5.50 per one way ride. The additional
ride expense is supplemented by contributions from a $5000 grant from the Park Nicollet
Foundation and the $3 fare charged to riders. The Housing Rehab Fund is the funding resource.
The amount of the City’s contribution was determined based on community size and the
anticipated number of riders annually.
For the initial 6 month contract, the City agreed to reimburse expenses for the Dial-a-Ride
service at the rate of $5.50 per ride up to $10,000. To date, the City’s contribution for services
provided from September through December totaled $3,052.50.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
The need for a variety of transportation modes allowing residents and visitors to easily and
inexpensively travel throughout the city and the entire metro region was identified through the
Visioning process as one of the City’s primary focus areas including the City Councils Strategic
Direction of being a connected and engaged community. In addition, creation of a dial-a-ride
program that expands ridership boundaries is consistent with many of the ideas and goals
proposed by the Visioning Transportation Action Team including:
• Creating a superior transportation system,
• Alleviate barriers,
• Transportation system should strive to be simple, convenient, safe and inexpensive for
everyone,
• All the transportation system components and modes should be integrated and designed
to support one another,
• Embrace existing and future technology to make transportation more convenient and cost
effective,
• Our transportation system is an innovative model for other communities, and
• Coordinate with neighboring cities’ transit efforts.
Attachments: None
Prepared by: Michele Schnitker, Housing Supervisor
Reviewed by: Kevin Locke, Community Development Director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
Meeting Date: January 23, 2012
Agenda Item #: 8
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Fourth Quarter Investment Report (October - December, 2011).
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
No action required at this time. This report is being provided for information sharing purposes.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
None at this time.
BACKGROUND:
The City’s investment portfolio is focused on shorter term cash flow needs and investment in
longer term securities. This is done in accordance with Minnesota Statute 118A and the City’s
Investment Policy objectives of: 1) Preservation of capital; 2) Liquidity; and 3) Return on
investment.
The total portfolio value increased by approximately $4.2 million in the fourth quarter. This was
primarily due to the receipt of the second half property tax settlement in early December from
Hennepin County. As discussed later in this report, a significant portion of the tax settlement
dollars is being held in money market accounts at end of year.
Approximately $4.3 million of the 2010D Fire Station Bond proceeds were remaining at
December 31, 2011. The vast majority of this is invested in commercial paper, with a small
portion in a money market. Commercial paper are promissory notes issued by financial
institutions and large corporations with very short maturity periods ranging from one to nine
months. The commercial paper was purchased in December to mature incrementally over a five
month period from January through May 2012. As each piece of commercial paper matures,
cash is made available to pay construction project expenses. The rates on the commercial paper
range from .23% to .68% compared to just .14% in the UBS Money Market Fund. Since the
bond proceeds could not be invested in long term securities, the higher yields on the commercial
paper have helped to keep the portfolio yield stable.
The overall yield of the portfolio was down slightly from the third quarter (1.29%) to the fourth
quarter (1.12%). This small decline was due in large part to the larger amount of cash held in
lower yielding money market accounts at end of year. Some longer term securities will be
purchased in the first quarter of 2012 as opportunities arise that meet the City’s investment
policy guidelines, which will help to raise the portfolio yield. Cities generally use a short
horizon benchmark such as the two year Treasury (.25% at 12/31/2011, .61% 12/31/2010, 1.14%
12/31/2009) or some similar measure for yield comparison of their overall portfolio.
Nearly one-half of the portfolio is invested in money markets and short term commercial paper.
As noted earlier, the remaining bond proceeds need to be available in the short term to pay the
monthly Fire Station contract payments. It is also necessary to have cash readily available for
Study Session Meeting of January 23, 2012 (Item No. 8) Page 2
Subject: Fourth Quarter Investment Report (Oct - Dec, 2011)
the normal cash flow needs for payroll and general operating expenses, and a significant amount
of cash will be needed on February 1st for the semiannual debt service payments and Pay As You
Go note payments. The money market account that was opened at Citizens Independent Bank
early in 2011 continues to earn .41%. This is substantially higher than the yield of either the 4M
Fund Money Market (.02%) or the UBS Money Markets (.14%). A $5 million balance is being
maintained in the Citizens Bank Money Market to help improve interest earnings on available
cash.
The other half of the portfolio is invested in longer term securities that will mature within one to
five years, if not called prior to the maturity date. About 75% of these longer term investments
are in municipal debt, which are bonds issued by States, local governments, or school districts to
pay for special projects. The rest of the longer term purchases are in callable agency bonds,
which are issued by government agencies such as the Federal Home Loan Bank or Fannie Mae.
They typically have more reasonable interest rates to the final maturity date, but the issuers have
the right to call the bonds in three months to a year if interest rates decline. This happens quite
frequently in the current market. Similar to past quarters, four securities were called prior to
maturity in the fourth quarter. Some new securities with comparable rates were able to be
purchased, which kept the portfolio yield relatively stable.
Here is a summary of the City’s portfolio at December 31, 2011:
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
None at this time.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
The City has a sound investment policy that brokers are required to follow with the goals of
preservation of capital, liquidity and return on investment. The policy is strictly followed in
making investment decisions to protect the City’s resources.
Attachments: Quarterly Investment Report
Prepared by: Darla Monson, Senior Accountant
Reviewed by: Brian A. Swanson, Controller
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
9/30/11 12/31/11
<1 Year 49% 54%
1-2 Years 14% 18%
2-3 Years 19% 10%
>3 Years 18% 18%
9/30/11 12/31/11
Money Markets $20,940,013 $30,415,916
Commercial Paper $7,265,482 $4,177,371
Municipal Debt $24,106,743 $26,792,131
Agency Bonds $14,021,074 $9,101,437
City of St. Louis Park
Investment Portfolio
December 31, 2011
Institution Type CUSIP Maturity Date
Yield to
Maturity Cost Basis
Market Value at
12/31/2011
Estimated Avg
Annual Income
Citizens Indep Bank Money Market 0.41%5,019,407 5,019,407 20,580
4M Fund Money Market 0.02%1,697,815 1,697,815 340
Citigroup/Smith Barney GNMA 7.19% 26,856 26,856 1,931
26,856
Wells Fargo Advisors FHLB 313375DF1 09/07/2016 1.60% 1,000,000 1,000,030 16,000
Wells Fargo Advisors FFCB 31331KD49 10/03/2016 1.48% 1,000,000 1,002,350 14,800
2,002,380
UBS Muni Debt-Illinois State 452152FD8 04/01/2013 1.84% 1,031,190 1,010,270 18,922
UBS Muni Debt-NYC 64971MN40 02/01/2016 3.03% 1,022,000 1,087,100 30,916
UBS Muni Debt-NYC 64971MN40 02/01/2016 3.07% 1,020,000 1,087,100 31,314
UBS FNMA 3136FRYJ6 07/19/2016 2.32% 1,000,000 1,004,900 23,200
UBS Muni Debt -Dist of Columbia 25476FLE6 06/01/2015 1.33% 1,085,400 1,074,000 14,447
UBS FHLMC 3134G2XP2 08/23/2016 1.50% 2,024,005 2,010,220 30,360
UBS Muni Debt -Calif State 13063A7E8 10/01/2013 0.78% 2,123,620 2,094,940 16,649
UBS FNMA 3136FRZ30 09/21/2016 1.32% 1,008,505 1,004,550 13,312
UBS Muni Debt - Gilroy, CA 376087CZ3 04/01/2015 1.81% 1,207,046 1,191,521 21,848
UBS Muni Debt - Calif State 13063BNR9 10/01/2015 2.00% 1,026,703 1,010,120 20,534
UBS Muni Debt - Atl City, NJ 048339RR8 12/15/2015 2.70% 477,278 471,546 12,887
UBS Money Market 0.14% 23,606,036 23,606,036 33,048
UBS Money Market (Fire Station Bonds)0.14% 92,658 92,658 130
UBS Comm Paper (Fire Station Bonds)01/03/2012 0.23% 1,199,755 1,199,976 2,759
UBS Comm Paper (Fire Station Bonds)02/02/2012 0.33% 789,551 789,803 2,606
UBS Comm Paper (Fire Station Bonds)03/02/2012 0.52% 659,132 659,617 3,427
UBS Comm Paper (Fire Station Bonds)04/02/2012 0.61% 778,388 779,220 4,748
UBS Comm Paper (Fire Station Bonds)05/02/2012 0.68% 747,847 748,755 5,085
40,922,333
Sterne, Agee Muni Debt-Van Buren, MI Sch 920729GP9 05/01/2012 2.80% 101,504 100,741 2,842
Sterne, Agee Muni Debt-Waukegan, IL 942860MS3 12/30/2012 2.45% 1,579,605 1,542,765 38,700
Sterne, Agee Muni Debt-Greenwood Cnty Sch 397118EC0 03/01/2013 2.03% 752,580 753,231 15,277
Sterne, Agee FNMA 3136F9BZ5 03/18/2013 3.96% 1,000,000 1,043,800 39,600
Sterne, Agee Muni Debt-Van Buren, MI Sch 920729GQ7 05/01/2013 3.12% 307,584 309,387 9,597
Sterne, Agee Muni Debt-Milan, MI Sch 598801HF8 05/01/2013 3.16% 599,360 592,238 18,940
Sterne, Agee Muni Debt-Illinois State 452152FD8 04/01/2013 1.75% 1,033,320 1,010,270 18,083
Sterne, Agee Muni Debt-Waukegan, IL 942860MT1 12/30/2013 2.95% 1,574,415 1,573,695 46,445
Sterne, Agee Muni Debt-Outagamie Cnty WI 689900TH1 04/01/2014 2.53% 820,919 839,759 20,769
Sterne, Agee Muni Debt-Van Buren, MI Sch 920729GR5 05/01/2014 3.52% 720,475 742,196 25,361
Sterne, Agee Muni Debt-Union Co NJ 906347SC4 06/01/2014 4.04% 558,740 565,168 22,573
Sterne, Agee Muni Debt-Illinois State 4521518U0 01/01/2014 3.25% 1,258,660 1,263,330 40,906
Sterne, Agee Muni Debt-Illinois State 4521518T3 01/01/2013 2.63% 865,649 869,032 22,723
Sterne, Agee Muni Debt-Illinois State 4521518S5 01/01/2012 1.65% 2,040,400 2,000,120 33,667
Sterne, Agee Muni Debt-Milwuakee Co, WI 602245WW8 10/01/2013 1.50% 1,001,340 1,009,250 15,020
Sterne, Agee Muni Debt-Smithfield, RI 832322NL1 01/15/2012 0.55% 281,924 280,115 1,551
Sterne, Agee Muni Debt-Smithfield, RI 832322NM9 01/15/2013 0.88% 277,072 277,131 2,424
Sterne, Agee Muni Debt-Smithfield, RI 832322NN7 01/15/2014 1.35% 280,290 282,048 3,784
Sterne, Agee Muni Debt-Smithfield, RI 832322NP2 01/15/2015 1.90% 276,127 282,717 5,246
Sterne, Agee Muni Debt-Smithfield, RI 832322NQ0 01/15/2016 2.40% 275,092 288,882 6,602
Sterne, Agee Muni Debt-Racine, WI 750046GB4 04/01/2014 0.70% 1,146,836 1,103,839 8,028
16,729,714
Wells Fargo FNMA 3136FPV46 01/13/2014 1.40% 1,000,000 1,000,280 14,000
Wells Fargo Muni Debt-New York, NY 64966HXW5 03/01/2013 1.00% 1,034,583 1,018,280 10,346
Wells Fargo Muni Debt-State of WA 93974CLV0 08/01/2014 1.33% 1,066,000 1,061,340 14,178
Wells Fargo FHLB 313372RK2 03/27/2013 1.02% 999,580 1,008,450 10,196
4,088,350
GRAND TOTAL 70,486,855 786,701
Portfolio Yield 1.12%
Study Session Meeting of January 23, 2012 (Item No. 8) Subject: Fourth Quarter Investment Report (October - December, 2011)Page 3
Meeting Date:
Meeting Date: January 23, 2012
Agenda Item #: 9
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
2011 Citywide Residential Property Condition Evaluation Program Summary.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
No action required. The purpose of this report is to update Council on the program results and
status.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
None at this time. Please inform staff of any comments or questions you might have.
BACKGROUND:
In 2001 legislation was introduced to provide state funding for a low interest loan incentive pilot
program encouraging exterior home maintenance for properties in violation of local property
maintenance codes. St. Louis Park was selected as one of three cities to receive funding
provided by the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA). This funding helped us establish
the 2002 Pilot Rehab Program.
In 2002, Property Maintenance Inspectors systemically evaluated all of the approximately 12,500
one and two family dwellings within the city. 200 properties were identified with substantial
exterior building deterioration in violation of the City’s Property Maintenance Code. All were
included in the program, with the City offering technical assistance and low interest loans to the
owners if they qualified. Community Development and Inspections staff worked with property
owners over the following year to promote home improvements, repairs and ultimately code
compliance. 21% of the property owners accessed the loan program not only for repairs but an
opportunity to make home improvements.
The city repeated this successful program again in 2006. Another MHFA grant was applied for
and received to help with funding of loans for the rehab of properties with substantial exterior
maintenance issues. This cycle resulted in fewer homes identified with significant visible
deterioration.
The Property Condition Evaluation program was planned to be repeated approximately every
four years regardless of the availability of MHFA loans.
In 2011 Property Maintenance Inspectors once again began their evaluation of over 12,500 one
and two family dwellings during April and May. The process for evaluating the properties
included driving through the streets and alleys to identify and photo document exterior
maintenance items. All types of observed deficiencies were included in this cycle.
A total of 560 properties were identified with some degree of visible code violations which
required follow-up:
Study Session Meeting of January 23, 2012 ( Item No. 9) Page 2
Subject: 2011 Citywide Residential Property Condition Evaluation Program Summary
• 329 properties had maintenance issues such as deteriorated paint, siding, and chimneys
and these properties were included in the City’s incentive program. Attached is a map
illustrating the general locations of these properties. Owners of properties included in the
program were sent inspection reports and information outlining the variety of home
improvement programs offered by the city to assist property owners with rehab and
repairs. A total of four improvement loans ranging from $7,000 to $18,000 were
processed; significantly fewer than during either of the 2002 or 2006 programs.
• 231 properties had relatively minor and easily corrected violations identified such as trash
and debris in the yard. For these properties general correction notices were issued.
• Of the total code violations identified, 532 have been re-inspected and found to be in
compliance. This is a very successful 95% ratio accomplished with letters, calls, and site
visits.
NEXT STEPS:
A total of 28 properties remain non-compliant. Most of these are for exterior paint deterioration
and required painting or residing of the properties. Repeated attempts to receive commitment
from these property owners to make the necessary corrections have not been successful. The
City Attorney will be preparing a final notice for owners giving them until June 1, 2012 before
enforcement action is initiated. Inspections staff will continue to work with property owners in
achieving compliance.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
None. The four loans made use of existing rehab loan programs.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
This program supports St. Louis Park commitment to providing a well maintained and diverse
house stock.
Attachment: SLP 2011 Citywide Property Evaluation Map
Prepared by: Brian Hoffman, Director of Inspections
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
Eliot
Aquila
Lenox
Fern Hill
Wolfe Park
Oak Hill
BlackstoneWestwood Hills
Birchwood
Elmwood
Sorensen
Triangle
Creekside
Bronx ParkCedar Manor
Cobblecrest
Lake Forest
Texa Tonka
Willow Park
Minikahda Vista
Browndale
South Oak HillKilmer PondBrooklawnsMeadowbrook
Eliot View
Cedarhurst
Shelard Park
Brookside
Minne-haha
PennsylvaniaPark
Crest-view
AmhurstWest-dale
Minikahda Oaks
SLP 2011 Citywide Property Evaluation
Property Evaluation Map
2011 Property Evaluations
SLPSDE.GENERAL.RAILROAD
Neighborhoods
Shelard Parkway
I-394 I-394
Flag AveHighway 169Edgemore DrTexas AveLouisiana AveHwy 7
Texas AveExcelsior WayHwy 100Hwy 100Soo Line RRHwy 7
Minnetonka Blvd
28th St W
Burlington
N
o
r
t
h
e
r
n
R
R
France AveExcelsi
or
Bl
v
d
Natchez Ave44th St
Northw
e
st
er
n
R
R
Douglas Ave
22nd St W
Hwy 7
0 0.5 1
Miles Ü
329 Properties with maintenanceissues conducted by SLPInspections
Legend
2011 Property Evaluations
Study Session Meeting of January 23, 2012 (Item No. 9)
Subject: 2011 Citywide Residential Property Condition Evaluation Program Summary Page 3
Meeting Date: January 23, 2012
Agenda Item #: 10
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Proposed Allocation of 2012 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
No action required at this time. This report is being provided to inform the Council of the
proposed allocation of 2012 CDBG funds. Please let staff know of any questions or comments
you might have. Time is available to allow a study session discussion to be scheduled on this
matter if so requested by the Council.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Does the City Council concur with the recommendations made for the allocation of the 2012
CDBG funds?
BACKGROUND:
At this time each year the City must decide how to use its annual allocation of CDBG Funds.
The City must submit its proposed use of the allocation to Hennepin County by February 23rd.
Prior to submittal, the City must hold a public hearing. The hearing and official City Council
action will be scheduled for February 21st.
CDBG funds are US Housing and Urban Development (HUD) funds distributed through
Hennepin County. Nationally, CDBG funding is expected to increase slightly from 2011, and
the County’s estimated allocation has increased by just over one percent. However, SLP’s
allocation is decreasing from $186,843 in 2011 to $173,258 for 2012. The allocation amount for
cities within the county is based on a calculation of 2010 census poverty data. SLP along with
Hopkins, Maple Grove, and Edina, have lower projected 2012 allocations based on 2010 poverty
numbers. Over the past decade CDBG funds for SLP have been trending down; a decade ago
SLP received over $300,000.
The County has advised we keep the proposed allocation flexible to allow for either a decrease or
increase in the final allocation amount and the attached draft resolution does so.
The national objectives of the CDBG program are:
• Benefit low and moderate-income persons (moderate is defined as up to 80% of median
income or $65,000 for a family of four, and low is defined as up to 50% of median income or
$41,950 for a family of four in 2010).
• Prevention or elimination of slum or blight.
• Meet a particular urgent community development need.
Study Session Meeting of January 23, 2012 (Item No. 10) Page 2
Subject: Proposed Allocation of 2012 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds
From a policy perspective, the City Council has typically focused CDBG funds on “sticks and
bricks” improvements to the housing stock for low-income families, for both single-family
owners and multifamily housing residents. Over the past years a small portion of funds have
been allocated to support public services for St. Louis Park Housing Authority (SLPHA)
residents and park programming for low-income youth as well as assisting STEP with the
acquisition of a new facility and with renovations at Lenox Center and STEP.
Proposed 2012 CDBG Allocation
The proposed use of our allocation of CDBG funds reflect the priorities described in Vision St.
Louis Park, the City’s housing goals adopted by the Council in the Comprehensive Plan, and the
CDBG national objectives. These priorities include preserving existing housing and increasing
affordable ownership opportunities.
This year’s proposed allocation is summarized in Table 1 below, which is followed by
descriptions of the proposed activities. Sixty-seven percent of the allocation, or $115,758 of the
$173,258, focuses on assisting low-income residents with emergency repairs, rehab loans and
affordable ownership opportunities. The remainder is proposed to assist Perspectives Inc. with a
roof replacement at their facility and a small amount is proposed for youth park programming at
Meadowbrook Manor Park.
The city’s non-profit affordable housing providers have historically received CDBG funds to
assist with their building renovations. A budget spreadsheet is attached that outlines historical
CDBG allocations to the city’s non-profit providers. The providers have completed significant
renovations in recent years. With the continued high need for single family homeowner
assistance and a proposed roofing project to be undertaken by Perspectives, staff did not solicit
requests from other non-profit housing providers this year, nor did any come forward requesting
CDBG assistance.
Table 1: Proposed 2012 CDBG Allocation
Project Activity
Proposed Ongoing
Activity Allocation
Low-Income Single Family Assistance
Low Income Single Family Emergency Repair Program $44,000 yes
Low Income Single Family Home Rehab Loan $43,758 yes
Affordable Housing Land Trust – Homes within Reach $10,000 yes
St. Louis Park Housing Authority – Rehab for scattered site home $18,000 yes
Low-Income Community Assistance
Perspectives Inc. Roof Replacement $50,000 new
Public Service – Youth Park Programming at Meadowbrook Park $7,500 yes
Total $173,258
If the actual allocation is less than the estimated $173,258 the SLPHA project will be decreased.
Emergency Repair Program – Single Family $44,000
This program is consistent with the Council’s focus on stick and bricks and has proven its
responsiveness to low income seniors and vulnerable residents with annual incomes of 50% or
less of the median area income, or $29,400 for a single person household, and assets less than
Study Session Meeting of January 23, 2012 (Item No. 10) Page 3
Subject: Proposed Allocation of 2012 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds
$25,000. It provides grants of up to $4,000 for emergencies such as leaking roofs, plumbing
repairs and water heaters. Community Action Partners for Suburban Hennepin County (CAPSH)
currently administers this program for the City. This is an ongoing CDBG activity.
Low Income Single Family Deferred Loan Program- $43,758
This is the primary ongoing CDBG rehab loan program targeted for homeowners with annual income
of 50% or less of the median area income, or $41,950 for a household of 4, and assets less than
$25,000. The rehab focuses on improvements to bring homes into code compliance and provide long-
term maintenance free housing. The maximum loan amount is $25,000 and is forgiven after 15 years.
Repayment is required if homeowners sell the property before the 15-year period expires.
The demand for our low-income home improvement loans and grants continues to be high. Despite
ongoing funding there is still a waiting list for the low income single family deferred loan program.
Continued funding, along with the program income realized from repayment of previous CDBG
deferred loans, should make it possible to serve three to five residents. This program is administered
by Hennepin County Housing staff.
Affordable Housing Land Trust – Homes within Reach $10,000
Homes within Reach is a program of West Hennepin Housing Land Trust that purchases homes
and sells them to low income homeowners. Buyers pay for the cost of the building only and
lease the land for 99 years. St. Louis Park funds are leveraged with Met Council and Hennepin
County HOME funds, and Homes within Reach administers this activity. Homes within Reach
has purchased eight homes in the city that have been sold to low income families. This program
is consistent with the Council’s focus on using CDBG funds for “sticks and bricks” activities.
St. Louis Park Housing Authority – renovation of a scattered site home - $18,000
The SLP Housing Authority provides housing to low income residents that are typically below
50% median income. The HA owns and manages 37 scattered site homes throughout the city.
The HA has requested $18,000 to assist with siding replacement at the 3017 Oregon and 4240
Raleigh Homes. The HA did not request funds for 2011, but continues to have needs for
renovation of its properties.
Perspectives Inc. - $50,000
Perspectives has requested $55,000 in CDBG funds to assist with the Perspectives Family Center
roof replacement project (see attached letter). Since the city’s allocation has been reduced, staff
is recommending that Perspective’s receive $50,000 which is the same amount STEP received
for their roof replacement in 2011.
Replacing the roof is the first of a three-phase, $4,000,000 complete renovation/transformation
of Perspectives Family Center. The estimated roof construction cost is $380,000 and includes
roof replacement, installation of solar panels and vegetation. Based on success of fund raising
efforts the roof project may be scaled back. Perspectives states that the goals of the renovation
include maximizing operation and energy efficiencies, long term financial sustainability and
enhancing program effectiveness. The Family Center, or south campus, is located at Walker and
Gorham Ave. It houses classrooms, a playground, Kids Café, conference rooms, workshop,
reception area and training rooms. It is home to the Kids Connection, clinical services, parenting
time program, volunteer office and office for the admin and program staff.
Study Session Meeting of January 23, 2012 (Item No. 10) Page 4
Subject: Proposed Allocation of 2012 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds
The building is 60 years old and in need of major repairs, including new roof, windows, heating
system, handicap accessibility, and energy-efficiency and technology improvements. The full
renovation is expected to meet the LEED, energy and efficiency design standards. The plans
comply with the city’s Green Building Policy. The total estimated cost is $4,047,518.
The CDBG funds would assist with the development of an extensive roof replacement that
includes roof top solar panels. Under Perspectives’ three phase renovation plan, the roof
improvement would be completed before December 31, 2013, which is the deadline for use of
2012 CDBG funds.
Public Service – SLP Park and Rec. Programming at Meadowbrook Manor Parks - $7,500
The Park and Recreation Department provides park programming to children at the
Meadowbrook Manor Apartment Community. The $7,500 would provide an enhanced level of
programming and ensure affordable registration fees. The youth park programming has been
funded with CDBG funds since 2007. Meadowbrook Manor Park is CDBG eligible based on
the poverty levels in this neighborhood.
NEXT STEPS:
The St. Louis Park Housing Authority (SLPHA) will review and discuss the proposed allocation
at its February 8, 2012 meeting. The Commissioners’ comments will be shared at the Public
Hearing on February 21, 2012. The following actions are required to receive 2012 CDBG
funds:
February 9, 2012 Publication of Public Hearing Notice
February 21, 2012 Public Hearing and Approval of Resolution Outlining Proposed Activities
February 23, 2012 Deadline for Submission of CDBG Application to Hennepin County
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
CDBG funds allow cities discretion (within the HUD guidelines) to fund projects that meet the
national low income objectives and the needs of cities. St. Louis Park will receive an estimated
$173,258 in 2012. The 2012 CDBG year runs from July 1, 2012 through December 31, 2013.
Staff anticipates the proposed projects can expend the funds in a timely manner as has been our
historical practice of fully expending CDBG funds.
In the event the final allocation is more or less than estimated, staff recommends reducing or
increasing the allocation to the SLPHA for rehab of one of their scattered site homes. Staff will
keep Council apprised of actual funding amounts.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
The City Councils adopted Strategic Direction related to housing is, “St. Louis Park is committed
to providing a well-maintained and diverse housing stock”. The use of CDBG funds for the
proposed allocation is consistent with this direction and the national objectives to benefit low and
moderate income persons.
Attachments: Draft Resolution
2012 CDBG Non Profit Affordable Providers - Budget Worksheet
Perspective’s Letter of Request for Funding
Prepared by: Kathy Larsen, Housing Programs Coordinator
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
Study Session Meeting of January 23, 2012 (Item No. 10) Page 5
Subject: Proposed Allocation of 2012 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds
DRAFT RESOLUTION NO. 12 - ____
RESOLUTION APPROVING PROPOSED USE OF 2012 URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM FUNDS AND
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENT WITH HENNEPIN
COUNTY AND ANY THIRD PARTY AGREEMENTS
WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park, through execution of a Joint Cooperation
Agreement with Hennepin County, is cooperating in the Urban Hennepin County Community
Development Block Grant Program; and
WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park has developed a proposal for the use of 2012
Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant funds made available to it; and
WHEREAS, the City held a public hearing on February 21, 2012 to obtain the views of
citizens on housing and community development needs and priorities and the City's proposed use
of $173,528 from the 2012 Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant.
BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of St. Louis Park approves the following
projects for funding from the 2012 Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block
Grant Program and authorizes submittal of the proposal to Hennepin County.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby authorizes and directs the
Mayor and its City Manager to execute the Subrecipient Agreement and any required Third Party
Agreement on behalf of the City to implement the 2012 Community Development Block Grant
Program.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that should the final amount of FY2012 CDBG
available to the city be different from the preliminary amount provided to the city, the City
Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to adjust project budget(s) to reflect an increase or
decrease in funding.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council February 2012
City Manager
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Project Activity Allocation
Low Income Single Family Emergency Repair Program $44,000
Low Income Single Family Home Rehab Loan $43,758
Affordable Housing Land Trust – Homes within Reach $10,000
St. Louis Park Housing Authority – Rehab for scattered site home $18,000
Perspectives Inc. Roof Replacement $50,000
Public Service – Youth Park Programming at Meadowbrook Park $7,500
Total $173,258
Study Session Meeting of January 23, 2012 (Item No. 10) Page 6
Subject: Proposed Allocation of 2012 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds
2012 CDBG Non Profit Affordable Providers - Budget Worksheet
Provider
Number
Units
CDBG
Funding
through 2011
2012
Proposed
Allocation Total
Average
CDBG$
per Unit
Vail Place 7 $25,000 $0 $25,000 $3,571
St. Louis Park Housing Authority -
Scattered Site Homes 37 $63,000 $18,000 $81,000 $2,189
Community Involvement Program 29 $133,800 $0 $133,800 $4,614
Wayside House* 60 $192,200 $0 $192,200 $3,203
Perspectives Inc.** 52 $157,100 $50,000 $207,100 $3,983
Project for Pride in Living -
Louisiana Court 129 $443,000 $0 $443,000 $3,434
Subtotal 314 $1,014,100 $68,000 $1,082,100 $3,446
Facilities - Non Housing
Providers
Lenox Community Center -
Facility 0 $100,000 $0 $100,000 $100,000
St. Louis Park Emergancy
Program (STEP) Facility 0 $112,500 $0 $112,500 $112,500
TOTAL $2,240,700 $2,376,700
*Wayside - 20 apartment units and 40 bed facility
** Perspectives - 52 apartment units and 1 program facility
Study Session Meeting of January 23, 2012 (Item No. 10) Subject: Proposed Allocation of 2012 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) FundsPage 7
Meeting Date: January 23, 2012
Agenda Item #: 11
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
2011 Annual Housing Programs Report.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
The purpose of this report is to update to the Council on housing programs and activity. This
report is informational and no action is required.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
None at this time. Please let staff know of any comments or questions you might have.
BACKGROUND:
One of the recommendations from the 2003-05 Housing Summit was to provide policy makers a
semi-annual report of housing programs and activity. New this year is the Executive Summary
that provides a quick review of the detailed report. Most notable for 2011 is that the year ended
with a net increase of construction of 6 single family homes and permitting of the 115-unit senior
rental, Wooddale Pointe building. This follows two very slow years of housing construction.
Also, the remodeling sector, which started sluggishly in 2011, picked up in the 2nd half with the
number of home additions and major remodels consistent with 2009 and 2010 levels.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable
VISION CONSIDERATION:
The city’s housing programs meet St. Louis Park’s Vision commitment to provide a well-
maintained and diverse housing stock; and to incorporate and provide incentives for “green”
building design; and provide affordable ownership opportunities.
Attachments: Annual Housing Programs Report - 2011
Prepared by: Kathy Larsen, Housing Programs Coordinator
Reviewed by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
Study Session Meeting of January 23, 2012 (Item No. 11) Page 2
Subject: 2011 Annual Housing Programs Report
Annual Housing Programs Report 2011
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The purpose of this report is to apprise City policy makers of housing program activity in 2011.
The report provides historical trends, program descriptions and additional information. Below
are key points of 2011, with details following this summary.
1. Remodeling Activity
Residents are maintaining and improving properties despite the economy.
• Home additions and major remodeling projects have been constant since 2009.
• Storm damage resulted in increased maintenance and roofing projects.
• Discount loan activity remains slow, likely reflecting moderate-income households’
reluctance to take on additional housing debt.
• Energy Rebate use is increasing.
2. Affordable Home Ownership and Public Housing Update
• Live Where You Work, the homebuyer’s assistance program picked up in latter 2011, a
total of eleven homebuyers used the program, four in 2011.
• The Greensboro HIA was adopted in November 2011, there are now 6 HIAs. Westwood
Hills continues to work towards requesting an HIA in 2012.
• Homes within Reach provided affordable ownership for eight low income families, two
in 2011, one of which was a vacant tax-forfeited property.
• Habitat for Humanity purchased a blighted property to build a new home in 2012.
• The SLP Housing Authority has high occupancy and long waiting lists.
3. Housing Matrix
• Housing construction began to take-off in 2011. After two years of very slow
construction, nine single family homes and one 115-unit apartment, Wooddale Point,
were permitted in 2011. Six homes were torn down.
• The increase in the number of non-homesteaded condos/townhomes that began in 2010 is
continuing in 2011: from 368 in 2008/9 to 840 in 2011.
• The Met Council revised the affordable housing guideline; housing is affordable to
households with incomes at or below 60% median area income, ($50,350 family of four)
paying 30% percent of their income for housing costs whether renting or owning. The
previous guideline was 50% MAI for rental, and 80% MAI for ownership. Consequently
there are fewer owner occupied units and more rental units considered affordable.
4. Related Issues
• The foreclosure rate slowed slightly from the 2010 level.
• Louisiana Court refinancing and capital improvement project on track.
Study Session Meeting of January 23, 2012 (Item No. 11) Page 3
Subject: 2011 Annual Housing Programs Report
1. REMODELING ACTIVITY
Residential permitted activity measures all remodeling activity, not just City incented activity;
this section shows historical trends of remodeling activity based on remodeling permit data.
Permit Trends
• Permit Types: 2005 - 2011
Based on the both the number and types of permits issued in 2011, additions and major
remodeling activity is holding at 2009-2010 levels. The bump in “alteration residential”
which is minor remodeling/general maintenance and roofing permits reflects damage from a
spring storm.
Table. Residential Remodeling By Permit Type from 2005-2011
Remodeling Permit
Type 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Addition Residential 55 86 102 89 55 40 48
Major Remodels 45 50 50 46 50 53 46
Alteration Residential 471 517 785 797 971 869 1,129
Reroof Only 202 216 355 4828 845 201 761
Reside Only 85 66 84 573 332 117 117
• Permit Valuation Activity 2005 - 2011
The 201l valuation for above remodeling activities returned to 2009 levels, at just over 26
million dollars. The chart below shows historical remodeling permit valuation for additions,
major remodels, basic maintenance, re-roofs, and siding.
Chart. Permitted Residential Remodeling Improvements from 2005 – 2011
$14
$15
$23
$68
$27
$17
$26
0
20
40
60
80
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011Permit Valuation -Million $Year
Residential Remodeling Permit Valuation
In 2008 a severe hailstorm damaged over 50% of the homes in SLP.
Study Session Meeting of January 23, 2012 (Item No. 11) Page 4
Subject: 2011 Annual Housing Programs Report
City Housing Improvement Services, Loans Trends and Program Descriptions
Architectural Design and Remodeling Advisor Services Trend
Use of the services is consistent with 2010 activity, eighty-two remodeling advisor visits and
twenty-nine architectural design consults have been conducted as illustrated in the chart.
Chart. Technical and Design Services
• Architectural Design Service Description
This service provides an architectural consultation for residents to assist with brainstorming
remodeling possibilities and to raise the awareness of design possibilities for expansions.
Residents select an approved architect from a pool developed in conjunction with the Mn
Chapter of the American Institute of Architects. All homeowners considering renovations
are eligible for this service regardless of income, however to ensure committed participants,
residents make a $25 co-pay.
• Remodeling/Rehab Advisor
The intention of this service is to help residents improve their homes (either maintenance or
value added improvements) by providing technical help before and during the construction
process. All homeowners are eligible for this service regardless of income. Resident surveys
indicated that homeowners valued the service and would recommend it to others. The City
contracts with the Center for Energy and Environment (CEE) for this service.
Home Remodeling Fair and Tour Trend
Both the Home Remodeling Fair and Tour attracted as many residents as ever; 396 – 500
residents visited each of the six tour homes; and approximately 1,500 attended attendees the Fair,
which emphasized cost effective DIY projects.
• Annual Home Remodeling Fair Description
The cities and community education departments of St. Louis Park, Hopkins, Minnetonka
and Golden Valley co-sponsor the fair. The fair provides residents an opportunity to attend
seminars, talk with vendors and city staff about permits, zoning, home improvement loans,
and environmental issues related to remodeling. The fair is a self-sustaining event and
vendor registration fees cover the costs.
• Home Remodeling Tour Description
The Tour’s goal is to provide residents hands-on examples of remodeling and expansion
projects of typical St. Louis Park housing, to provide ideas, inspiration and information.
Study Session Meeting of January 23, 2012 (Item No. 11) Page 5
Subject: 2011 Annual Housing Programs Report
City Loan Trends
The chart shows that the number of discount loans, twenty-two, in 2011 has dropped
significantly from previous years. In 2010 federal stimulus of tax credits and energy saver
rebates bumped loan use and ended in 2010. The current use of discount loans likely reflects the
reluctance of moderate-income owners to take on additional housing debt. The number of
Move-Up loans, ten, is consistent with 2010, yet lower than during the flush housing years of the
mid 2000’s.
Chart. City Loan Activity 2005-2011
Participation Rate of Move-Up Loans
An average of 22% of residents that have expanded their homes have used the Move-Up loan as
shown in the following table.
Table. Participation Rate: Use of Move-Up Loans and Home Additions by Year
Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
# Move-Up Loans 7 27 27 18 17 9 10 110
# Permitted Additions 55 86 102 89 55 40 48 489
Participation Rate of
Move Up Loans 13% 31% 26% 20% 31% 23% 21% 22%
• Discount Loan Program Description
This program encourages residents to improve their homes by “discounting” the interest rate
on the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (Mn Housing) home improvement loans.
Residents with incomes of $67,120 or less qualify for a greater discount than those with
incomes of $95,150 or less. Eligible improvements include most home improvement projects
with the exception of luxury items such as pools and spas. The City contracts with CEE for
loan administration. Implementation of discounting of MHFA loans began in late 1999 as a
pilot project. Successful marketing efforts have led the City to be third among all Minnesota
cities to use the MHFA loans, only exceeded by Minneapolis and St. Paul.
Study Session Meeting of January 23, 2012 (Item No. 11) Page 6
Subject: 2011 Annual Housing Programs Report
• Move – Up Transformation Loan Description
Since 2006, 22% of the major remodeling projects completed by residents have been
incented using the Move-Up Loan. The purpose of this loan is to encourage residents with
incomes at or below 120% of median area income ($99,240 for a family of four) to expand
their homes. The program provides deferred loans for 25% of the applicant’s home
expansion project cost, with a maximum loan of $25,000. Loan repayment at 0% interest is
deferred until the home is sold - if the resident remains in the home for 30 years, the loan will
be forgiven. This in effect establishes a revolving loan pool which will continue to fund
future expansions. Four loans have been repaid when residents moved, for a total of
approximately $120,000.
This loan requires significant upfront work by the residents, from deciding on the scope of
the project to selecting contractors. Loan guidelines are:
• Only residents making significant expansions are eligible. The minimum project cost
must exceed $35,000.
• The maximum loan amount is $25,000.
• The loan has 0% interest with a carrying cost fee of 3% paid by the borrower which
covers the lender’s administrative fee.
Green Remodeling Program Trend
Revisions to the program included use of energy rebates and CEE’s new Home Energy Loan.
The use of rebate incentives increased to 83 in 2011. The average rebate was $186, for a total
City cost of $15,465. CEE provided 16 low interest loans to residents making qualifying energy
improvements.
Table. Number of Energy Efficient Rebates by Year
Year 2009 2010 2011
# Rebates 22 42 83
• Green Remodeling Program Description
The green remodeling program helps residents remodel green by providing advisory visits,
rebates and low interest loans. The city provides a match of 50% of gas and electric utility
rebates for energy efficient furnaces, water heaters and air conditioners. CEE provides
energy loans from 0-4% interest for energy efficient qualifying improvements. There is no
cost to the city for the CEE loan.
Summary of Move-Up Activity Loan and Service Costs 2005- 2011
Historically for every dollar the City has invested in move-up and discount loans, technical and
design services, and administrative costs, residents have been investing five dollars. This pattern
of 1:5 has been relatively consistent since the City began implementing loan programs and
services for residents. In 2010 and 2011 this ratio changed slightly, for every dollar the city
expends, residents spend five and a half dollars.
In 2011, the City invested approximately $273,000, which has leveraged $1,543,040 worth of
private improvements. The following table shows City investment in the Move-Up Programs
since 2005.
Study Session Meeting of January 23, 2012 (Item No. 11) Page 7
Subject: 2011 Annual Housing Programs Report
Table: Move Up Services and Costs 2005 – 2011
Service
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
#
City
Cost #
City
Cost #
City
Cost #
City
Cost #
City
Cost #
City
Cost #
City
Cost
Move Up
Loan
7
$182,806
27
$591,264
27
$620,000
18
$330,937
17
$329,650
9
$209,769
10
$226,877
Discount
Loan
76
$45,636
88
$186,205
50
$74,000
55
$114,129
52
$106,000
64
$86,263
22
$29,213
Architect
Design
Service
68
$15,300
102
$22,950
62
$12,400
49
$11,025
12
$7,200
30
$6,750
29
$6,525
Remodeling
Advisor
221
$28,730
157
$20,410
179
$23,270
130
$16,900
126
$16,380
89
$11,510
82
$10,250
TOTAL
372
$272,472
374
$820,829
318
$729,670
252
$472,991
207
$459,230
192
$314,292
143
$272,865
2. AFFORDABLE HOME OWNERSHIP, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK
GRANTS AND PUBLIC HOUSING UPDATE
Live Where You Work
The Live Where You Work Homebuyer Assistance Program began in spring 2009. The goal is
to promote home ownership within the City among employees of St. Louis Park businesses. The
city provides a deferred loan of $2,500 to an eligible employee and an additional $1,000 is
provided to employees purchasing vacant lender owned foreclosed properties. Employers are
invited to contribute a matching or lesser amount to the City’s contribution. The deferred loan
will be forgiven after 3 years if the employee continues to work for the employer and meets
other qualification requirements. The City contracts with CEE for loan administration. Four
homebuyers used this program in the 2011, for a total of eleven participants to date.
Housing Improvement Area (HIA)
The HIA is a finance tool to assist with the preservation of the city’s existing housing stock. An
HIA is a defined area within a city where housing improvements are made and the cost of the
improvements are paid in whole or in part from fees imposed on the properties within the area.
The Association borrows low interest money from the City; improvements are completed; and
unit owners repay the loan through fees imposed on their properties, and collected with property
tax payments.
The first HIA was established in 2002, to date, six HIA’s have been established and over
$8,000,000 worth of improvements have been made to 792 units. Greensboro Condos HIA was
established in 2011, and improvements totaling nearly $4,000,000 will begin in the spring of
2012. Westwood Villa Association is working toward an HIA.
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
Activity completed in 2011 was funded with 2010 CDBG funds. Approximately $180,000,
funded improvements to a SLP Housing Authority home, the single family low-income
homeowner’s emergency repair and loan programs, Homes within Reach, Habitat for Humanity
and youth park programming. Funding levels were cut for 2011 to $186,000 with anticipated
cuts to $173,000 in 2012.
Study Session Meeting of January 23, 2012 (Item No. 11) Page 8
Subject: 2011 Annual Housing Programs Report
West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust, aka Homes Within Reach (HWR).
Homes within Reach is a program of West Hennepin Housing Land Trust that purchases homes
and sells them to low income homebuyers. Buyers pay for the cost of the building only and lease
the land for 99 years. City funds are leveraged with Met Council and county HOME and AHIF
funds. HWR administers this activity and has purchased eight homes in the city that have been
sold to low income families, two occurred in 2011.
Twin Cities Habitat for Humanity
The city has partnered with Habitat over the years to acquire nine blighted properties for rehab or
tear-down for new construction. In 2011 the city assisted Habitat with the purchase of one
property. Construction of an affordable large family home is scheduled for 2012.
3. HOUSING MATRIX
In 2009 the City Council adopted into the City’s Comprehensive Plan its housing goals that
evolved from the 2003-05 Housing Summit. One of the strategies is to provide a matrix showing
existing housing by type including detached/attached, owner/rental, family/senior, and
affordable/market rate and goals. The matrix is a guide to evaluate future housing development
proposals. The attached matrix is updated semi-annually and presented to the City Council,
Housing Authority and Planning Commission. It shows at a glance the numbers and percentages
of: housing types, tenure (owner or rental), affordable units, senior designated units and large
single family homes.
2011 Highlights
• After two years of little housing activity, the Wooddale Pointe, senior rental building with
115 units was permitted. Nine new single family homes were constructed, three were
demolished and these tear-downs were replaced with larger homes for a net gain of 6 new
homes. Plans are proceeding with the West End and Ellipse 2 Apartments.
• Forty-eight permits were issued for single family home expansions.
• A notable increase in the number of non-homesteaded condos/townhomes began in 2010, and
is continuing in 2011 as shown in the table below. This increase reflects the difficulty of
selling condos when the lending market for modest valued condos is tight. It also reflects
reluctance of owners to sell with the depressed market values of condos.
Table. Non – Homesteaded Condos and Townhomes Increasing Since 2009
Year 2009 2010 2011
Total Number 368 676 849
• The number of non-homesteaded single family detached homes increased from 800 in 2010
to 840 in 2011.
• The historical ratio of 60% ownership and 40% rental is being impacted by the addition of
the non-homesteaded condo/townhome and single family homes and results in 59% of the
total housing units being owner occupied.
• Despite the increase in non-homesteaded properties, the City Assessor cautions not to assume
that all non-homesteaded properties are rentals, as they also include second homes.
Study Session Meeting of January 23, 2012 (Item No. 11) Page 9
Subject: 2011 Annual Housing Programs Report
Large Single Family Homes
One of the City’s housing goals is to increase the number of larger homes available in the city.
The following charts illustrate expansion and new construction activity since we began tracking
this in 2005. From 2005 to 2011, 540 large single family homes have been added to the City’s
housing stock. In 2011, 57 large homes have been added; 9 were new construction and 48
existing homes added significant expansions.
Chart. Single Family New Construction and Expansions by Year
Large single family homes are defined as greater than 1,500 sq feet, with 3 BR or more, 2 baths
or more and a 2-car garage. The following chart illustrates the total number of large family
homes resulting from expansions and new construction that have been added since 2005.
Chart. Total No. Large SF Homes - Through Expansion and New Construction
Affordable Housing
The Met Council revised the affordable housing guideline in 2011. The new affordable guideline
is that housing is affordable to households with incomes at or below 60% median area income,
($50,350 family of four) paying thirty percent of their income for housing costs whether renting
or owning. The previous guideline was 50% MAI for rental, and 80% MAI for ownership.
Study Session Meeting of January 23, 2012 (Item No. 11) Page 10
Subject: 2011 Annual Housing Programs Report
Owner Occupied
• The 2011 affordable ownership purchase price is $160,250 or less, compared to $233,100
value in 2010. This is a huge difference of over $70,000 which reflects the 60% MAI
definition, tighter lending standards and a decrease in median area income in 2011.
• Based on the new guideline there are significantly fewer owner occupied homes considered
affordable, down from 8,581 to 2,264
Rental
• The 2011 affordable monthly rent, for a 2 bedroom apartment for a family of four is $1,116
or less for a 2 bedroom apartment for a family of four.
• There is an estimated minimum of 4,138 affordable rental units – including known
subsidized units and estimated market rate units. The actual number is unknown as market
rate numbers are based on the SLPHA Rental Study, which represents approximately 60% of
the total rental units in the city.
Table. Comparison of 2010 & 2011 Met Council Affordability Guidelines & Number of Affordable Units
2010 Guideline 2010
Numbers 2011 Guideline 2011
Numbers
Affordable Ownership Units $233,100 House Value 8,581 $160,250 House Value 2,264
Affordable Rental Units
Estimated & Subsidized
$943 monthly rent for
2BR apt. Family of 4 3,734 $1116 monthly rent for
2BR apt. Family of 4 4,138
Totals 11,261 6,402
4. RELATED ISSUES
Foreclosures
Foreclosures are measured by the number of sheriff sales. Residential foreclosures were lower in
2011 (163) than 2010 (195), matching the metro area trend of fewer foreclosures – though still
higher than previous years. The ongoing foreclosures are primarily related to loss of employment
and underemployment. As the number of foreclosures slowed, the rate of condos in foreclosure
slowed slightly; in 2010, 28% of the foreclosures were condos and in 2011 it dropped to 24%.
Foreclosures by residential type are:
• 109 were single family detached homes
• 40 condominiums
• 8 townhomes (3 held by one owner)
• 6 duplexes
Study Session Meeting of January 23, 2012 (Item No. 11) Page 11
Subject: 2011 Annual Housing Programs Report
Chart: St. Louis Park Residential Foreclosures by Year 2006 - 2011
• Sales of Foreclosed Homes
The City Assessor has been tracking the sale of foreclosed homes since 2008 to provide a
picture of the turn-around of foreclosed homes. The table below shows how long they are
taking to sell and the lower sale value to assessed value.
2008 2009 2010 2011
# Residential Foreclosures based on
Sheriff Sales 133 99 195 163
# Days from Sheriff Sale to Market Sale -
Absorption Time (includes 6 months
redemption period)
360 300 301 not available
% Median Sale Price to Assessed Valued 66% 69% 63% not available
The average number of days on the market for St. Louis Park non-foreclosed homes trended
from 112, 118, 125 to 145 days over this same four year period, according to the Minneapolis
Area Association of Realtors. The increased volume of foreclosures is impacting longer
sales time and lower sale prices of non-foreclosed homes.
• Property Work Group
The City’s Property Watch Team, developed in 2006, monitors foreclosure activity and
problem properties. Staff from all departments track, monitor and respond to issues related
to problem foreclosed homes. The goal of this effort is to ensure that vacant, foreclosed
homes do not become “problem properties.” The Inspection Department follows up with
vacant foreclosed properties through the Property Maintenance Inspection process and
complaints, working with bankers, investors and the managing companies. In addition to the
City’s concerted efforts, bankers and lenders have become far more proactive in ensuring
their investments are maintained.
The city continues to promote the foreclosure prevention services provided by Community
Action Partnership of Suburban Hennepin County and Home Ownership Center through
direct mailings, Park Perspective, City’s social media and staff referrals.
Study Session Meeting of January 23, 2012 (Item No. 11) Page 12
Subject: 2011 Annual Housing Programs Report
Louisiana Court Update
As of December 2011, PPL/Louisiana Court is near 100% occupancy. On June 1st, Metro
Plains Management Company assumed property management of PPL’s Louisiana Court complex
from Perennial Management. Perennial had managed the development since 2006 and although
there were times when the occupancy improved during their tenure, they never really resolved
the ongoing vacancy problem experienced at the development. Metro Plains has been hired with
the understanding that marketing and minimizing vacancies needs to be a priority and that this
needs to be done without compromising applicant screening and lease compliance enforcement.
Another effort to improve marketability at the development also got underway in May. The
rehab work funded as part of the financial restructuring that took place at the end of 2010 began
on May 31. Although some work was done in the common areas of the buildings, the majority
of the work focused on extensive rehab to the interior of 16 units at the complex. The work was
completed in August.
ST. LOUIS PARK HOUSING AUTHORITY UPDATE
The Housing Authority administers programs that ensure the availability of safe and desirable
housing options in the St. Louis Park community. These programs include the Public Housing
program, Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher rental assistance program, Shelter Plus Care rental
assistance program, Louisiana Court Max 200 Rental Assistance Program, and TRAILS family
self-sufficiency program. The Authority currently serves over 500 eligible, low-income
households through their housing programs.
Public Housing
The HA owns a low-rise apartment building (108 one-bedroom units and 2 two-bedroom
caretaker units) built in 1975, and 37 scattered site single-family units (3 to 5 bedrooms)
acquired and constructed between 1974 and 1996. Although the low-rise building is designated
for general occupancy, priority is given to elderly and disabled. The single-family scattered units
house larger families with children. The HA also holds the HUD Annual Contributions Contract
(ACC) and maintains a waiting list for 12 two-bedroom Public Housing apartment units located
at Louisiana Court. These units are owned and managed by Project for Pride in Living. The
units and occupancy rates are noted in the table.
Public Housing Total
Units 1-BR 2-BR 3-BR 4-BR 5-BR
Occupancy
December
31, 2011
Hamilton House 108 108 99%
Scattered Site Single Family 37 0 0 17 17 3 99%
Louisiana Court, Metropolitan
Housing Opportunity (MHOP) Units 12 12 100%
Total (bedroom size) 108 12 17 17 3
Total 157
Study Session Meeting of January 23, 2012 (Item No. 11) Page 13
Subject: 2011 Annual Housing Programs Report
Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program
The HA is funded to administer up to 268 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers. The rent
assistance program provides rent subsidies for low-income individuals and families in privately
owned, existing market rate housing units. The rent subsidy is paid directly to the owner of the
rental property by the HA with funds provided by HUD. The HA offers both tenant-based and
project-based vouchers. Forty vouchers of the HA’s allocation are designated for use in three
privately owned developments (Excelsior & Grand, Vail Place and Wayside) and are referred to
as project-based vouchers.
Shelter Plus Care
The Shelter Plus Care Program is designed to link rental assistance with supportive services for
hard-to-reach homeless persons with disabilities (primarily those who are seriously mentally ill
or have chronic problems with alcohol, drugs or both) and their families. Grants are provided to
be used for permanent housing which must be matched with supportive services that are equal in
value to the amount of rental assistance and appropriate to the needs of population to be served.
St. Louis Park is the grant recipient and we partner with three sponsor organizations that
administer supportive housing programs.
Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers
(HUD Approved) Units Utilization YTD
December 31, 2011
Tenant-Based (68 are Port-Outs) 219 100%
Tenant-Based Port - Ins 68 Avg./month
Project-Based: 37
Wayside House 15 100%
Excelsior & Grand 15 83%
Vail Place 7 100%
Shelter Plus Care Rental Assistance: 35
Perspectives Inc. 11 97%
Community Involvement Program (CIP) –
Scattered Site Homes
8
94%
CIP- Clear Spring Road 8 100%
Project for Pride In Living (PPL) 8 100%
Total 359
Waiting Lists
Assisted Housing Waiting List as of June 30, 2011
Public Housing 1-BR 1-BR
Handicap 2-BR 3-BR 3-BR
Handicap 4-BR 5-BR Total
1,025 78 343 319 17 97 64 1943
Section 8 470
Excelsior & Grand 76
St. Louis Park Housing Types, Numbers and PercentagesHOUSING MATRIXDecember 31, 2011Housing TypeNet Units added 1/1/11-12/31/11# Units % Units # UnitsSingle Family Detached11,612 50% 6Duplex424 2% 0Condos and townhomes3332 14% 0Apartments7547 33% 115COOPs121 1% 0Total* 23,036 100% 121 13,530 59% 9506 41% 1,347 6% 2,264 10% 2990 13% 1148 5% 1029 4%* Percentages are based on the percentage of the total number of all housing units. Data source: SLP Community Development, Development Activity in St. Louis Park, SLP Inspections and Assessing.0In 2011 the Met Council revised the affordable housing income standard. Rather than using 50% MAI for rental, and the 80% MAI for ownership, the new affordable definition is that housing is affordable to households with incomes at or below 60% MAI ($50,350 family of four) paying thirty percent of their income for housing costs whether renting or owning. The 2011 affordable purchase price is $160,250 or less and the a monthly rent of $1,116, or less for a 2 bedroom apartment for a family of four is considered affordable. The number of affordable rental units is incomplete and based on units reported to the SLPHA for its 2010 rental study.NOTE: Increasing number of non homesteaded and/or rental condos/thomes: 268 in 2007, 368 in 2008 & 2009, 676 in 2010 and 849 in 2011.421219231060Housing Production by Type##1054#5210,77215424830001402,742052568402708497547Senior Designated2011 Reported Affordable Market Rate Rental Units #Housing UnitsPublic Subsidized Affordable Units, Includes Section 8 Housing UnitsOwner OccupiedNon Home- steaded and/or Rental##2011 Affordable Market Rate Units Owner Occupied49921,763Large Family Homes, Affordable and Senior Housing0Large Family Home - 1,500 sq ft., 3+Bedrooms, 2+ Bath & 2+ Car Garage#1,34701/18/2012Study Session Meeting of January 23, 2012 (Item No. 11) Subject: 2011 Annual Housing Programs ReportPage 14