HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012/07/16 - ADMIN - Agenda Packets - City Council - RegularAGENDA
JULY 16, 2012
6:30 p.m. SPECIAL STUDY SESSION – Council Chambers
Discussion Items
1. 6:30 p.m. Pedestrian and Bicycle System Implementation Plan and Policy Review
7:20 p.m. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY -- Council Chambers
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Approval of Minutes
3a. Economic Development Authority Minutes June 18, 2012
4. Approval of Agenda
5. Reports
5a. EDA Vendor Claims
6. Old Business -- None
7. New Business
7a. Internal Loan for Westwood Villa Association Housing Improvement Area (HIA)
Recommended Action: Motion to Adopt EDA Resolution authorizing an internal loan
from the EDA to the City to be used for housing improvements within the established
Westwood Villa Association HIA (“Westwood Villa HIA”), which was established on
May 7, 2012.
8. Communications
9. Adjournment
7:30 p.m. CITY COUNCIL MEETING – Council Chambers
1. Call to Order
1a. Pledge of Allegiance
1b. Roll Call
2. Presentations
2a. Recognition of Brenda Nelson’s Years of Service
2b. Meadowbrook Collaborative Awareness Month Proclamation – August 2012
2c. Outstanding Citizen Award Recognition
3. Approval of Minutes
3a. Study Session Meeting Minutes June 11, 2012
3b. Special Study Session Meeting Minutes June 18, 2012
3c. City Council Meeting Minutes of June 18, 2012
Meeting of July 16, 2012
City Council Agenda
4. Approval of Agenda and Items on Consent Calendar
NOTE: The Consent Calendar lists those items of business which are considered to be routine and/or which
need no discussion. Consent items are acted upon by one motion. If discussion is desired by either a
Councilmember or a member of the audience, that item may be moved to an appropriate section of the regular
agenda for discussion. The items for the Consent Calendar are listed on the last page of the Agenda.
Recommended Action: Motion to approve the Agenda as presented and items listed on the Consent Calendar; and to waive
reading of all resolutions and ordinances. (Alternatively: Motion to add or remove items from the agenda,
or move items from Consent Calendar to regular agenda for discussion.)
5. Boards and Commissions -- None
6. Public Hearings
6a. Off-Sale Liquor License – Liquor Boy, Inc.
Recommended Action: Mayor to close public hearing. Motion to approve an off-sale
intoxicating liquor license to Liquor Boy, Inc. located at 5620 Park Place Boulevard
with the license term through March 1, 2012.
7. Requests, Petitions, and Communications from the Public -- None
8. Resolutions, Ordinances, Motions and Discussion Items
8a. Commence Eminent Domain Action for Public Purposes - Highway 7 / Louisiana
Avenue Interchange Project
Recommended Action: Motion to Adopt Resolution authorizing Condemnation of
Land for Public Purposes - Highway 7 / Louisiana Avenue Interchange Project –
Project No. 2012-0100.
8b. Project Report: Roadway/Trail Improvement – Beltline Blvd at Regional Trail Crossing
Recommended Action: Motion to Adopt Resolution accepting the project report,
establishing the project, approving plans and specifications and authorizing
advertisement for bids.
8c. Preliminary and Final Plat – Eldridge Fifth Addition (Application #12-15-S)
Recommended Action: Motion to Adopt Resolution approving the preliminary and
final plat of Eldridge Fifth Addition subject to conditions.
9. Communication
Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. To make arrangements, please call
the Administration Department at 952/924-2525 (TDD 952/924-2518) at least 96 hours in advance of meeting.
Meeting of July 16, 2012
City Council Agenda
CONSENT CALENDAR
4a. Adopt Resolution designating 2012 polling places and appointing election judges for the
August 14, 2012 State Primary Election and the November 6, 2012 State General Election
4b. Adopt Resolution allowing Mayor and Councilmembers to use the City fitness facility at
Fire Station 1 during their term in office
4c. Appoint the following people to the time limited Environment/Sustainability Task Force as
determined by the City Council at its June 25 study session: Kandi Arries, Timothy Brausen,
Judy Chucker, Andrew Emanuele, Lisa Genis, Terry Gips, Tom Hillstrom, Ellen Lipschultz,
Susan Melbye, Rick Person, Amy Peterson, Eric Schultz, Brian Shekleton, Kelly Spors, and
Paul Zeigle
4d. Approve Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance approving Changes to Chapter 8 regarding
Businesses and Licenses and Chapter 12 for Nuisance Abatement and Assessment
4e. Approve Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance to approve changes to Chapter 4 and
Chapter 12 of the City Code relating to the feeding of wildlife, and to approve ordinance
summary and authorize publication
4f. Adopt Resolution approving acceptance of monetary donations from friends at Westwood
Hills Nature Center in memory of Jim Lanenberg and Jane Grimsrud in the amount of $133
to purchase and plant shrubs by the pond area at Westwood Hills Nature Center
4g. Adopt Resolution approving acceptance of monetary donations from the Family and Friends
of Anne Goldberg in the amount of $646 for Westwood Hills Nature Center
4h. Adopt Resolution authorizing final payment in the amount of $20,282.06 and accepting
work for the Taft Storm Water Lift Station with Northdale Construction Company Project
No. 2007-2400, City Contract No. 139-11
4i. Adopt Resolution authorizing final payment in the amount of $8,559.13 and accepting work
for Water Project – Well Redevelopment (SLP 14) with Keys Well Drilling Company
Project No. 2011-1401, City Contract No. 121-11
4j. Adopt Resolution accepting work and authorizing final payment in the amount of
$10,435.16 for the 2011 City Sealcoat Project with Pearson Brothers, Inc. - Project No.
2011-0001, City Contract No. 112-11
4k. Designate Hardrives, Inc. the lowest responsible bidder and authorize execution of a contract
with the firm in the amount of $436,634.50 for the Traffic Signal Project – Park Center
Boulevard at Park Summit, Project No. 2012-1306
4l. Enter in to a Public Improvement Agreement with Target Corporation for the Traffic Signal
Project – Park Center Boulevard at Park Summit, Project No. 2012-1306
4m. Approve Consultant Contract for construction administration services and traffic signal
timing for Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit, Project No. 2012-1306
4n. Adopt Resolution authorizing the special assessment for the repair of the sewer service line
at 2924 Ottawa Avenue South, St. Louis Park, MN – P.I.D. 31-029-24-34-0096
4o. Adopt Resolution authorizing the special assessment for the repair of the water service line
at 1464 Idaho Avenue South, St. Louis Park, MN – PID 05-117-21-43-0041
4p. Adopt Resolution accepting donations received from the following businesses during
the 2012 Fire Department Grand Opening and Open House:
• Northland Aluminum $300.00 Check
• Rainbow Foods $50.00 Gift Card
• Cub Foods $200.00 Gift Card
• Sam’s Club $100.00 Gift Card
• Costco $50.00 Gift Card
Meeting of July 16, 2012
City Council Agenda
4q.
Adopt Resolution granting approval for the Preliminary and Final Plat of Medley Row
4r. Adopt Resolution rescinding Resolution 91-146 relating to a previous use of the Highway 7
Corporate Center site at 7003 West Lake Street
4s. Approve a Temporary On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for the Frank Lundberg
American Legion Post 282, 5605 36th St. W. in St. Louis Park for an event to be held on
August 4, 2012, in the parking lot at the American Legion
4t. Adopt Resolution authorizing the installation of permit parking restrictions along both sides
of France Avenue from 3328 France Avenue to W. 34th Street
4u. Adopt Resolution in support of The Southwest Twin Cities Yellow Ribbon Coalition
4v. Adopt Resolution presenting Bob Ramsey, Ann Thomas and Todd Brewer with a St. Louis
Park Outstanding Citizen Award
4w. Adopt the following Resolutions Imposing Civil Penalties for Liquor License
Violations according to the recommendation of the City Manager:
• Resolution imposing civil penalty for liquor license violation on May 18, 2012, at El
Patron Mexican Cuisine, 8140 Hwy. 7.
• Resolution imposing civil penalty for liquor license violation on May 18, 2012, at Wok
in the Park, 3005 Utah Ave. So.
• Resolution imposing civil penalty for liquor license violation on May 30, 2012, at Grand
City Buffet, Inc., 8912 Hwy 7.
• Resolution imposing civil penalty for liquor license violation on May 30, 2012, at Pei
Wei Asian Diner, 5330 Cedar Lake Rd., Suite 600.
4x. Adopt Resolution accepting the work and authorizing final payment in the amount of
$18,272.71 for the City Hall Garage Roof Replacement Project No. 2009-1700
4y. Adopt Resolution ordering the abatement of the hazardous building located at 2915 Ottawa
Avenue South
4z. Approve for Filing Human Rights Commission Minutes of April 17, 2012
4aa. Approve for Filing Planning Commission Minutes of May 16, 2012
4bb. Approve for Filing Vendor Claims
St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority and regular City Council meetings are carried live on Civic TV cable channel 17 and
replays are frequent; check www.parktv.org for the schedule. The meetings are also streamed live on the internet at www.parktv.org,
and saved for Video on Demand replays. The agenda is posted on Fridays on the official city bulletin board in the lobby of City Hall and
on the text display on Civic TV cable channel 17. The agenda and full packet are available by noon on Friday on the city’s website.
Meeting Date: July 16, 2012
Agenda Item #: 1
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Pedestrian and Bicycle System Implementation Plan and Policy Review
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff would like Council input on proposed bike lanes and proposed financial and
communications plans associated with the proposed Pedestrian and Bicycle System
Implementation Plan.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Staff desires Council direction in the following areas:
1. Would the City Council like to consider changing some of the proposed Bike Lanes to
Bikeways now or allow for that possibility during the public input process?
2. Does Council support the staff recommended financing plan?
3. Does Council wish to have the City pay for construction of the Neighborhood sidewalks
proposed to be constructed in this plan or should adjacent residents be required to pay for
these?
4. Does Council have any concerns or questions regarding the proposed communications /
public involvement process and schedule?
BACKGROUND:
History
At the June 11th Study Session staff presented the final proposed Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan
and a ten year prioritized Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Council provided input on the
prioritization of the projects in the CIP as well as discussed possible parking restrictions
associated with utilization of Bike Lanes.
Council requested staff to provide an evaluation of the proposed Bike Lanes and what parking
restriction implications there might be associated with implementing the proposed Bike Lanes.
Council also requested staff prepare a financial and communications plan for consideration at a
future Study Session.
Follow Up Activities
Based on Council input, staff has revised the proposed Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan and the ten
year prioritized Capital Improvement Program (CIP). In addition, staff has evaluated Bike Lane
parking restriction impacts and developed a financial and communications plan for the proposed
Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan.
Bike Lane Analysis (Exhibit 1)
Streets where Bike Lanes were being proposed were checked to see if parking would need to be
restricted if Bike Lanes were installed. In every instance, it appears parking would need to be
restricted (to some degree) to install Bike Lanes – our streets are simply not wide enough to
accommodate parking lanes, designated / striped Bike Lanes, and vehicle travel lanes.
Special Study Session Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 1) Page 2
Subject: Pedestrian and Bicycle System Implementation Plan and Policy Review
In some instances, parking is already restricted so Bike Lanes could be installed with no impacts
to adjacent properties. In other instances, there is “no actual need” for on street parking so
parking restrictions and Bike Lane installation should not be a problem. In a few instances
however, parking restrictions will eliminate residential parking and doing so may be viewed by
some as controversial. Five streets have been identified, highlighted in red on Exhibit 1, where
removal of parking may be viewed by some as controversial. These plan elements could be
removed from the plan, be revised from Bike Lanes to Bikeways (which should not require
parking restrictions), or be allowed to remain in the plan for public review and comment. Staff
suggests leaving them in the plan for the public to comment on.
Financial Plan
Based on Council input, staff has revised the proposed plan and the plan CIP. A summary of the
CIP is attached, Exhibit 4, showing plan elements and costs by year. Please note – the costs in
the summary do not account for inflation, engineering, contingencies, right-of-way acquisition or
other unknown project costs. Staff feels these factors will significantly add to the costs shown
and projects the total cost to build the proposed improvements proposed to be in the $18 - $25
million dollar range.
The proposed plan identifies and currently includes costs for the construction of Neighborhood
sidewalks. These walks are in the plan as they are felt necessary to access the larger Community
walk system. Normally, these walks are constructed at the request of and at the cost of adjacent
residents utilizing the city’s adopted special assessment process. In addition, in the past residents
objected to the installation of Neighborhood walks due to sidewalk snow removal requirements.
To gain resident support, it may be necessary for the city to finance the costs of constructing
these walks if they are to be installed as a part of this plan. A less aggressive method to
construct identified Neighborhood walks would be to allow neighborhoods, blocks, or individual
property owners to petition for their construction at city cost. The city could then run a project
development process and finance the construction / installation if there was area resident support
for a specific Neighborhood walk or project.
Finance staff has evaluated possible funding sources and determined the following funds could
be used for these proposed improvements:
1. General Obligation (G.O.) Bonds - repaid via tax levy over time – 10-20 years
2. Hybrid of internal financing and G.O. Bonds
3. Internal financing – significantly decreases City’s ability to finance other projects
4. Pay as you go – means sharper tax levy increases near term versus G.O. Bonds
5. Special Assessment
Considering other improvements, such as a civic center, and variable construction costs and
schedules, staff feels GO Bonds would be the best funding source to use to finance these
improvements. This same approach was discussed with the City Council at its workshop last
January. GO Bonds may be used to reimburse costs after projects have been constructed so total
project expenses and respective bond amounts will be known and can be easily managed. The
city has adequate cash reserves to cash flow these improvements prior to issuing bonds. Bond
sales could possibly occur in years 2015, 2018, and 2021; other city projects along with delays
and variable expenses will influence the specific amount and year of each bond sale.
Further discussion on all city projects and long term financing will be done in conjunction with
and as a part of the 2013 Budget and CIP process later this summer.
Special Study Session Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 1) Page 3
Subject: Pedestrian and Bicycle System Implementation Plan and Policy Review
Communications Plan (Exhibit 5)
Staff has developed a communications plan which utilizes a broader citywide message to begin
this effort and then more distinct communications aimed at specific project improvements – what
will be done and where so every property owner may assess the entire plan as well as consider
personal impacts and concerns. The schedule calls for this to begin immediately, leading up to
adoption of the proposed plan by Council before the end of this year. As the process develops,
public involvement and input may delay Council adoption of the plan into 2013.
As a part of the public process, staff anticipates many concerns being raised and questions being
asked. Based on past planning activities, staff has prepared Exhibit 9 - Expected Issues and
Concerns. In dealing with issues and concerns, staff and Council earlier developed Guiding
Principles (see Exhibit 8) staff uses in discussing and developing the proposed projects in the
proposed plan. These are being provided to Council at this time to aid in answering questions
and concerns that are expected to be heard when the public communications process begins.
One concern not on the list that may be heard is that not all sidewalk gaps are being addressed in
this proposed plan. It is not reasonable or affordable to construct all sidewalks in the city at this
time so only certain Neighborhood walks have been included at this time. Missing walks could
be added into the plan by Council at any time in the future if that is desired. Does Council have
concerns on justifying or explaining why not all sidewalk gaps were addressed in this plan?
Summary and Next Steps
Assuming Council is comfortable at this point with the proposed financing and public
communications plans, staff will begin the public communications process immediately.
The following tentative process and schedule has been developed to aid in implementing this
plan:
Council discussed the proposed CIP project priority (const yrs) May 29
Council provided direction on the proposed CIP June 11
Council reviews financial and public involvement plans July 9
Council considers remaining policy questions July 9
Staff conducts public involvement / input process July - Oct
Council adopts proposed sidewalk, trail, and bikeway systems
along with, final policies, and the CIP
Nov - Dec
Construction May 2013 – Oct 2023
Based on the process associated with the adoption of the last sidewalk / trail plan and CIP, it is
possible this schedule could be extended for months to a year.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATIONS:
If Council decides to expand the system of Community sidewalks and trails via a capital program
as proposed, a source of capital ($18 - $25 million dollar range) and maintenance funds ($34,000
annually in present day costs) will be needed. The recommended source for the capital costs
would be the issuance of GO Bonds. The likely source for the additional maintenance costs
would be the General Fund.
Special Study Session Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 1) Page 4
Subject: Pedestrian and Bicycle System Implementation Plan and Policy Review
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Strategic Direction - The following vision Strategic Direction and focus areas were identified
by Council.
St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged community.
Focus will be on:
• Developing an expanded and organized network of sidewalks and trails.
Attachments: Exhibit 1 - Bike Lane Analysis
Exhibit 4 - CIP Summary Info
Exhibit 5 - Communications Plan
Exhibit 8 - Guiding Principles
Exhibit 9 - Expected Issues and Concerns
Prepared by: Michael P. Rardin, Public Works Director
Reviewed by: Sean Walther, Senior Planner
Scott Brink, City Engineer
Jamie Zwilling, Communications Coordinator
Brian Swanson, Controller
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
Special Study Session Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 1) Page 5
Subject: Pedestrian and Bicycle System Implementation Plan and Policy Review
Exhibit 1
Bike Lane Analysis
Sidewalks, Bikeways, and Trails
Expect
Project Length (ft) Location (on or along) Begin End Const Yr Restrict Parking Controversy
Bike lane 5,069 France Ave N City Limits Minnetonka Blvd 2013 Yes No
Bike lane 4,000 Texas Ave Wayzata Blvd Cedar Lake Road 2013 Yes Yes
Bike Lane 1,858 Monterey Dr 36th St Excelsior Blvd 2013 Currently Restricted No
Bike Lane 6,059 Texas Ave 28th St Hwy 7 2013 Yes Yes
Bike Lane 3,711 36th St Monterey Dr Alabama Ave 2015 Currently Restricted No
Bike Lane 2,886 Beltline Blvd CSAH 25 36th St 2015 Currently Restricted No
Bike Lane 1,226 Ottawa Ave CSAH 25 Minnetonka Blvd 2015 Yes Yes
Bike Lane 4,069 Shelard Parkway Betty Crocker Dr Wayzata Blvd 2015 Currently Restricted No
Bike Lane 1,252 Wayzata Blvd Ford Road 14th St 2015 Yes No
Bike Lane 4,000 Louisiana Ave Wayzata Blvd Cedar Lake Road 2015 Currently Restricted No
Bike Lane 5,122 Louisiana Ave Cedar Lake Road 32nd St 2015 Yes Yes
Bike Lane 7,200 Louisiana Ave 32nd St Excelsior Blvd 2015 Currently Restricted No
Bike Lane 1,687 Zarthan Ave Cedar Lake Road Wayzata Blvd 2020 Yes Yes
Bike Lane 1,420 Quentin Ave Douglas Ave Cedar Lake Road 2020 Yes No
Special Study Session Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 1) Page 6
Subject: Pedestrian and Bicycle System Implementation Plan and Policy Review
Exhibit 4
CIP Summary Information
Sidewalks, Bikeways, and Trails
Construction
Year
Annual
Construction
Cost
Sidewalk
Costs
Bikeway
Costs
Bike Lane
Costs
Trail
Costs
Bridge
Costs
2013 $587,500 $228,000 $45,000 $101,500 $213,000 $0
2014 $300,000 $176,000 $44,000 $0 $80,000 $0
2015 $6,729,900 $187,000 $26,400 $247,000 $369,500 $5,900,000
2016 $317,000 $304,000 $13,000 $0 $0 $0
2017 $429,000 $422,000 $7,000 $0 $0 $0
2018 $2,255,000 $240,000 $15,000 $0 $0 $2,000,000
2019 $456,000 $456,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
2020 $237,000 $148,000 $22,000 $28,000 $39,000 $0
2021 $712,500 $692,500 $20,000 $0 $0 $0
2022 $256,000 $244,000 $12,000 $0 $0 $0
2023 $425,000 $425,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$12,704,900 $3,522,500 $204,400 $376,500 $701,500 $7,900,000
Element Community Sidewalks
Neighborhood
Sidewalks Bikeways Bike Lanes Trails Bridges
Length (ft.) or # 57,608 21,169 117,599 44,237 15,572 4
Cost of Neighborhood Sidewalks $1,137,500
Cost of Community Sidewalks $2,385,000
Total Sidewalk Construction Costs $3,522,500
Notes:
1. Costs above do not account for inflation, engineering, contingencies, right-of-way acquisition and other unknown project costs. Public Works
feels these factors will significantly add to the cost shown and project the total cost to build the improvements proposed in the $18 - $25
million dollar range.
Special Study Session Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 1) Page 7
Subject: Pedestrian and Bicycle System Implementation Plan and Policy Review
Exhibit 5
Communications Plan
Sidewalk, Trails, and Bikeways
July 2012
A Branded Initiative
As the Sidewalk, Trails and Bikeways plan is a long-term, multi-faceted initiative, it’s important that the city
establish an identity for it that will be recognizable to community members for years to come. This will also
help the public understand that each smaller project is part of something larger. The Communications Division
is currently developing a logo and taglines that will be consistent with the city’s overall brand but also give an
identity to the multi-year initiative under the “Connect the Park” name. Taglines will focus on the initiatives
roots in Vision St. Louis Park and on the specific components of the initiative.
Three Phases
There are three phases or components of communication messages/deployment. Some overlap and many tools
will be used across phases, but the essential elements are as follows:
Phase One – Educate the public about the roots of the plan (i.e. Vision), explain the work that has been done
and the Council’s goals for the initiative. This is a citywide effort that will also aim to educate the community
about the various components of the plan, the benefits and answer the “why” question and show the overall
picture about this initiative.
Phase Two – Educate the public about the specific elements contained in the initiative, projected costs and
physical impacts (i.e. loss of right of way, parking, etc.). This communication will be tailored to four quadrants
of the city either based on Ward boundaries or other boundaries deemed appropriate by Public Works staff.
Phase Three – Educate the public about the specific elements affecting them in their neighborhoods or on their
streets. The most local element of the Communication Plan, this portion will be conducted much like we
conduct communications for any street or utility project with meetings and mailings directed at affected parties.
Goals
• To remind residents about the city’s Vision, previous work already completed on the sidewalks and trail
plan, and the Council’s commitment to the long-term vision of a connected community
• Educate residents about the components of the proposed plan (Sidewalks, trails, bike lanes & bikeways)
• To inform residents about new proposed Sidewalk, Trails, and Bikeways in St. Louis Park
• To obtain resident input regarding the proposed Sidewalk, Trails, and Bikeways in St. Louis Park
Communication tools to be utilized in plan
• News release
• Website
• Cable Television
• Social Media
• Neighborhood Newsletters
• Park Perspective
• Staff Presentations
o Generate list of organizations
Special Study Session Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 1) Page 8
Subject: Pedestrian and Bicycle System Implementation Plan and Policy Review
• Brochures/Posters
o Mailed to all residents
o Handed out at city events
• Maps
• Open Houses
Strategies
News Release – The news release will be issued to the Sun-Sailor, Patch, Star Tribune and local
television stations to announce that the city is seeking input on a 10-year plan. A map and project list
will be included. PHASE 1
Website – The city will utilize a project website that will include a main article about the initiative
(likely based off of the original press release), upcoming events, maps, pdf documents of publications
and Council reports related to the initiative, and a list of all of the proposed projects with details (as
each project is undertaken). The site will also include a Frequently Asked Questions area that will
develop over time, and ways to provide feedback (email/phone) will include staff contacts. PHASES 1,
2, 3
The city will use a separate domain name for the initiative – www.ConnectThePark.org in its branding
initiative. This won’t be a separate website, but the domain name will be redirected to the project page
on the city’s website allowing for easy access. The city has used other domain names for marketing
purposes such as beautifythepark.org and parkTV.org in the past with success.
Additionally, the proposal will be highlighted on the spotlight of the homepage of stlouispark.org as
space is available (usually for a couple of weeks at a time), especially around major events such as
public meetings.
Cable Television – We’ll highlight the proposed plan in several ways:
• Scripted Public Service Announcement (Commercial) with voiceovers that will run on the
Cable TV system, be embedded to the website and shared on social media. This will be an
introduction to the “Connect the Park” Initiative and explain how the public can learn more.
PHASE 1
• Regular promotion through our weekly “Park Update” program which is shared on the Cable
TV system, the website and social media. PHASES 1, 2, 3
• Create a Cable TV Billboard announcement (the informational screens that run on the Cable
TV system in between programming) Phases 2,3
Social Media – Social media has become a powerful tool for the city now with nearly 4,500 people
inside and outside of the community utilizing them. A series of informal messages linked to our main
website article to promote the proposed plan will be utilized. Phases 1, 2, 3
Neighborhood Newsletters – The content of the initial news release, which contains the basic
information about the proposed plan, plus a link to the website, will be provided to neighborhood
leaders for inclusion in their publications and websites. Additional information will be relayed to the
Community Liaison for inclusion in regular communication with neighborhood leaders. Phases 2, 3
Park Perspective – The content of the initial news release, which contains the basic information about
the proposal, plus a link to the website, will be included in the August Park Perspective. Photos will be
included and the content will be reworked into a basic Q & A format. In the November Park
Perspective, a brief update, including any upcoming meetings will be included in the newsletter. After
that time, the Park Perspective will be used as a tool for printed updates and to reference the website.
Special Study Session Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 1) Page 9
Subject: Pedestrian and Bicycle System Implementation Plan and Policy Review
It’s expected that at least once annually, probably the spring/summer edition each year, the Park
Perspective will be utilized for a more extensive update that outlines the planned projects for each year.
Phases 1, 2, 3
Flyer / Brochure – A full-color educational brochure will be created highlighting the plan elements
proposed for construction, the City’s Vision and overall education about the reasons for creating and
implementing the plan. This brochure will be mailed to all St. Louis Park households and businesses.
Phase 1
Four separate mailings will then be created that deal specifically with projects proposed in the four
separate wards (or other quadrants as determined by staff). These mailings will include maps and
specific project details and timelines in local area. Phase 2
Poster – Staff will create a full-color 11 x 17 poster containing some details of the proposal and
references to ConnectThePark.org and hung in city buildings and other locations throughout the
community. Phase 1
Maps – Staff from the Information Resources and Public Works departments will collaborate on both
printed and interactive online maps for the public to utilize. Phases 1, 2, 3
Staff Presentations – Staff will provide project presentations to neighborhood and community groups
as requested. Phases 1, 2, 3
Open Houses – The city will hold four public meetings (one each in each of the four wards or
quadrants as determined by staff). Phases 2,3
Timeline
July
• Staff prepares communication tools (publications, videos, maps, website, posters etc.)
August
• News release issued
• Park Perspective Article
• Website project page launched
• Initial overview publication sent to neighborhoods
• Posters debut
September
• Public Service Announcement Debuts
• TV Billboard announcements begin (highlight meeting dates, website, maps)
• Information shared with neighborhood leaders
• Ward/Quadrant information sent to residents (prior to Public Meetings)
• Public Meetings Begin
October
• Public meetings continue
November
• Park Perspective article
Ongoing
• Social media
• Cable TV
• Website
• Park Perspective
Special Study Session Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 1) Page 10
Subject: Pedestrian and Bicycle System Implementation Plan and Policy Review
Exhibit 8
Guiding Principles
Sidewalks, Bikeways, and Trails
Design & Construction:
1. Current Designs:
• Sidewalk - 6' concrete with 7' grass boulevard
• Trail - 10' bituminous with 7' grass boulevard
2. Design Options (when necessary):
• Narrow grass boulevard up to nothing (eliminate)
• Narrow sidewalks up to 5' in width
• Narrow trails up to 8' in width
3. Minimize parking restrictions associated with Bikeway designations
4. Facilities to be ADA accessible.
5. Narrow existing streets to accepted standards
• Restrict or eliminate parking (when necessary).
6. Curve sidewalks/trails to avoid tree removals.
7. Forester determines tree viability (remove or trim).
8. Leave trees, walks, fences, etc. wherever possible.
9. Relocate or bury utilities in lieu of moving walk or trail.
10. Avoid right of way acquisition whenever possible.
11. Improvements should not decrease public safety.
12. Retaining wall need and ownership to be determined per existing Council policy.
13. Design and construct facilities as adopted by Council unless Council directs otherwise.
Maintenance:
1. Facilities to be maintained to Ordinance requirements or better.
2. All sidewalk and trail repairs are City responsibility and at City cost.
3. Community sidewalk and trail snow removal will be by the City at city cost.
4. Neighborhood sidewalk snow removal will be by residents at resident cost.
Special Study Session Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 1) Page 11
Subject: Pedestrian and Bicycle System Implementation Plan and Policy Review
Exhibit 9
Expected Issues and Concerns
Sidewalks, Bikeways, and Trails
Expected issues, concerns, and suggestions related to proposed Sidewalks, Bikeways, and Trails:
1. Sidewalk maintenance (snow removal)
2. Adverse property impacts:
• reduced yard size
• removal of trees
• alterations to walls and fences
• reduced aesthetics
• reduced property values
3. Cost - too costly, do not raise taxes
4. Closeness of walks or trails to homes/buildings
5. Driveways will become too short to park cars
6. Concern over increase in outsiders and crime
7. Necessity - there is no need for walks or trails - walk in the street
8. Safety concerns over:
• additional vehicle/pedestrian conflicts at driveways
• children falling off retaining walls
9. Discourteous or disrespectful use of walks and trails by users
10. Bicycle traffic will cause or increase congestion
11. Adverse impacts to the character or culture of a neighborhood
12. Put walks/trails at the curbline
13. Put walks on just one side of a street
14. Narrow up walks/trails
15. Do more "on street trails"
16. Narrow up streets
17. Consider one-way streets
18. Eliminate or restrict street parking in some areas
19. Some sidewalks should be removed from the proposal
20. Some sidewalks should be added to the Proposal
21. Locate walks/trails elsewhere - where more appropriate
22. Show more importance to major street crossings
23. Let neighborhoods decide what is best in their respective area
24. Do less, this is too much
Meeting Date: July 16, 2012
Agenda Item #: 3a
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
JUNE 18, 2012
1. Call to Order
Vice President Mavity called the meeting to order at 7:21 p.m.
Commissioners present: Vice President Anne Mavity, Steve Hallfin, Julia Ross, Susan Sanger,
and Jake Spano.
Commissioners absent: President Sue Santa and Commissioner Jeff Jacobs.
Staff present: Executive Director (Mr. Harmening), Economic Development Coordinator (Mr.
Hunt), Director of Inspections (Mr. Hoffman), and Recording Secretary (Ms. Hughes).
2. Roll Call
3. Approval of Minutes
3a. Economic Development Authority Minutes June 4, 2012
The minutes were approved as presented.
4. Approval of Agenda
The agenda was approved as presented.
5. Reports
5a. Economic Development Authority Vendor Claims
It was moved by Commissioner Hallfin, seconded by Commissioner Spano, to accept for
filing Vendor Claims for the period May 26, 2012, through June 8, 2012.
The motion passed 5-0 (President Santa and Commissioner Jacobs absent).
6. Old Business - None
7. New Business
7a. Structurally Substandard Building Designation – 9920 Wayzata Blvd.
(former Santorini’s Property). EDA Resolution No. 12-09
Mr. Hunt presented the staff report and explained the City is seeking to order the
Santorini’s property owner to restore the property to full building code compliance or to
have the property demolished. He stated the property is located at a highly visible
quadrant in the City and represents a redevelopment opportunity for the City as a mixed
EDA Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 3a) Page 2
Subject: EDA Meeting Minutes of June 18, 2012
use development and the EDA may wish to consider facilitating this redevelopment
through the use of tax increment financing by the establishment of a TIF district. He
indicated that removal of the building prior to creation of the TIF district could
potentially preclude use of that financing tool in the future. In order to protect the
possibility of creating a TIF district at this location while still removing the substandard
building, the EDA must adopt a resolution establishing that the property is occupied by a
structurally substandard building prior to demolition. He stated that City staff hopes to
reach agreement with the property owner to remove the substandard building and staff
would then bring that agreement to the EDA for formal approval. He stated these actions
will allow the EDA to create a TIF district for up to three years following demolition of
the substandard building but does not commit the EDA to providing TIF rather it simply
preserves the EDA’s ability to use this financing tool in the future should it wish to utilize
it.
Commissioner Ross asked if an agreement has been reached with the property owner.
She also asked how the EDA would be reimbursed.
Mr. Hunt explained that the Inspections Department and Community Development
Department have contacted the owner and intend to follow-up with the owner to work out
an agreement. He indicated the City’s preference would be to require the property owner
to pay for demolition and barring that, the City could enter into an agreement with the
property owner whereby the City agrees to finance the demolition and be reimbursed for
demolition costs plus attorneys’ fees through the TIF district.
Commissioner Ross requested information regarding the City’s timeline.
Mr. Hoffman indicated the EDA resolution directs the City Attorney to notify all property
interest holders that the City is taking action and provides approximately 30 days for the
property owner to respond and if no progress is made, the EDA resolution outlines the
process that would be undertaken by the City.
Mr. Harmening stated that in the event the property owner is uncooperative, the City
would demolish the property and all out of pocket costs, including demolition and
attorneys’ fees, would be assessed against the property.
It was moved by Commissioner Ross, seconded by Commissioner Sanger, to approve
EDA Resolution No. 12-09 Designating a Building as Structurally Substandard.
The motion passed 5-0 (President Santa and Commissioner Jacobs absent).
8. Communications - None
9. Adjournment
The meeting adjourned at 7:30 p.m.
______________________________________ ______________________________________
Secretary Vice President
Meeting Date: July 16, 2012
Agenda Item #: 5a
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other: Vendor Claims
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
EDA Vendor Claims
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to accept for filing Vendor Claims for the period June 9 through July 6, 2012.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
BACKGROUND:
The Finance Department prepares this report for council’s review.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
None.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
Attachments: EDA Vendor Claims
Prepared by: Connie Neubeck, Account Clerk
7/11/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:31:54R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
1Page -Council Check Summary
7/6/2012 -6/9/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
15,796.00BELTLINE LRT STATION PLANNINGBARR ENGINEERING CO
15,796.00
30.00DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A LEGAL SERVICESCAMPBELL KNUTSON PROF ASSOC
30.00
20.00CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU MISC EXPENSECSM FINANCIAL
20.00
3,465.94DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESHOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP INC
3,465.94
538.80DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A TRAININGHUNT, GREG
538.80
3,000.00HRA LEVY G&A LEGAL SERVICESLOCKRIDGE GRINDAL NAUEN PLLP
3,000.00
434.57DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A TELEPHONENEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
434.57
9,764.99DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A PLANNINGSRF CONSULTING GROUP INC
9,764.99
Report Totals 33,050.30
EDA Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 5a)
Subject: EDA Vendor Claims Page 2
Meeting Date: July 16, 2012
Agenda Item #: 7a
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Internal Loan for Westwood Villa Association Housing Improvement Area (HIA)
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to Adopt EDA Resolution authorizing an internal loan from the EDA to the City to be
used for housing improvements within the established Westwood Villa Association HIA
(“Westwood Villa HIA”), which was established on May 7, 2012.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
At the April 16 and May 7, 2012 Council Meetings, Council discussed and approved financing
the improvements within the Westwood Villa HIA with a combination of bonds and internal
funding. This action authorizes the internal loan for advancing the funds.
State Statute authorizes cities to establish HIA’s as a finance tool for private housing
improvements. An HIA is a defined area within a city where housing improvements are made
and the cost of the improvements are paid in whole or in part from fees imposed on the
properties within the area.
BACKGROUND:
On May 7, 2012 the Council adopted Ordinance 2413-12 establishing the Westwood Villa HIA
and passed Resolution No. 12-066 imposing fees. This was done in response to Westwood Villa
Association’s petition to the Council to conduct a public hearing regarding the establishment of
Westwood Villa Association as an HIA.
The HIA statute provides a 45 day veto period, during which owners may submit objections to
the HIA. If 45% of the owners submit written objections the HIA is halted. The veto period
expired on June 21, 2012, and although a significant number of written objections were received
(27 of 66 owners or 41%), it was not enough to meet the threshold to stop the HIA. The Board
and their consultants have been working since the May public hearing to reduce the construction
costs. Bids have been received and evaluated and the total construction cost is decreasing
approximately $575,000. This significant reduction is based on: actual bids for the elevator and
chiller system that were lower than estimated; reducing the contingency from 30% to 17%; and
removing the pipe riser replacement based on further evaluation by two additional experts.
The total project costs cannot exceed $2,185,000 – the amount approved for the HIA fee, but
they can be less. Approximately half will be financed through the issuance of the City’s taxable
general obligation HIA bonds and up to $1,100,000 will be financed through a loan of funds
from the EDA’s Development Fund. Both the bonds and the EDA loan will be repaid to the City
from the HIA fees collected with the real estate taxes of the property owners located in the
Westwood Villa HIA. Both the bonds and the EDA loan will have a twenty year term, and the
interest rate on the EDA loan will be set at 100 basis points higher than the interest rate on the
bonds, with a finalized EDA loan payment schedule to be prepared upon issuance of the bonds.
EDA Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 7a) Page 2
Subject: Internal Loan for Westwood Villa Association Housing Improvement Area (HIA)
The bond sale is currently scheduled for late September. The proceeds of the bonds will be used
to finance a portion of construction costs at both the Greensboro Condominiums (established
Dec 5, 2011), and the Westwood Villa Condominiums. This is being done to take advantage of
cost savings in issuing one series of bonds for both projects.
An internal loan is required to loan funds from the EDA to the City and then to the Association;
these actions require an EDA resolution authorizing the loan. The internal loan will be for an
amount up to $1,100,000 and only the amount of funds needed to pay for project costs will be
advanced. A portion of this internal loan may be repaid to the EDA when bond proceeds are
received in October (the remaining portion will be repaid through collection of the HIA fees).
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
The proposed method of financing the Westwood Villa HIA improvements results in the City
lending the Westwood Villa Association an amount not to exceed $2,185,000, a portion of which
will come from the EDA Development Fund. The City’s Controller is involved in structuring the
loan and ensuring that assessment procedures are followed. The loan, bond and resolution
documents have been prepared by EDA legal counsel. The executed Development Agreement
with the Association ensures that the loan is secured by Association Assets, defined as dues, fees,
assessments and other income owing to the Association from unit owners. Owners have the
option to prepay prior to the fees being assessed and avoid interest costs. The prepayment period
expires on July 20. Owners that do not prepay will begin fee payment with their property taxes
beginning in 2013 and have the option to pay-off the fee in future years.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
The Westwood Villa Association HIA improvements are consistent with Vision St. Louis Park
and the Strategic Directions adopted by the City Council: “St. Louis Park is committed to
providing a well-maintained and diverse housing stock”. The HIA tool addresses affordably
valued, aging owner-occupied townhouse and condominium housing stock. The proposed
improvements specifically address the focus of property maintenance to foster quality housing
and community aesthetics.
Attachments: EDA Loan Resolution
Prepared by: Kathy Larsen, Housing Programs Coordinator
Reviewed by: Kevin Locke, Community Development Director
Brian Swanson, City Controller
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
EDA Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 7a) Page 3
Subject: Internal Loan for Westwood Villa Association Housing Improvement Area (HIA)
ST. LOUIS PARK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
EDA RESOLUTION NO. 12-____
AUTHORIZING AN INTERNAL LOAN FOR ADVANCE OF FUNDS
IN CONNECTION WITH HOUSING IMPROVEMENTS
WITHIN THE WESTWOOD VILLA OWNERS ASSOCIATION
HOUSING IMPROVEMENT AREA
BE IT RESOLVED by the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority (the
“EDA”) as follows:
Section 1. Recitals.
1.01. The City of St. Louis Park ("City") is authorized under Minnesota Statutes,
Sections 428A.11 to 428.21 (the "Housing Improvement Act") to establish by ordinance a
housing improvement area within which housing improvements are made or constructed and the
costs of the improvements are paid in whole or in part from fees imposed within the area. The
City Council of the City (“Council”) adopted a Housing Improvement Area policy on July 16,
2001.
1.02. In order to facilitate Housing Improvements to property known as the "Westwood
Villa Association" the Council on May 7, 2012, established the Westwood Villa Association
Housing Improvement Area by Ordinance No. 2413-12 (the "Enabling Ordinance") and
approved a Housing Improvement Fee (the “Fee”) by Resolution 12-066.
1.03. For the purposes of this Resolution, the terms "Westwood Villa Association
Housing Improvement Area" and "Housing Improvements" have the meanings provided in the
Enabling Ordinance.
1.04. The City has entered into a Development Agreement (the “Agreement”) between
the City and the Westwood Villa Association (the “Association”) under which the City will make
a loan of funds legally available for such purpose (the “Loan”) to the Association to finance the
Housing Improvements as described in the Agreement.
1.05. Upon approval of the Internal Loan the City will transfer funds in the amount of
up to $1,100,000 (the “Loan Amount”) from any account or accounts determined by the City
Controller into a Westwood Villa Association Housing Improvement Area Project Fund (the
“Project Fund”) hereby established. Pursuant to the Agreement, the intended source of the Loan
is the Development Fund administered and controlled by the EDA. The City will disburse funds
in the Project Fund to the Association in accordance with Article III of the Agreement, and will
reimburse the EDA from the Fee revenues together with any amounts received from the
Association under the terms of Section 6.6 of the Agreement.
1.06. The EDA has determined to specify the terms of the Loan in more detail in this
resolution.
EDA Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 7a) Page 4
Subject: Internal Loan for Westwood Villa Association Housing Improvement Area (HIA)
Section 2. Repayment of the Loan Amount.
2.01. The Loan Amount, together with interest accruing from January 1, 2013, shall be
repaid over a 20-year term in semi-annual installments of principal and interest ("Payments") on
each February 1 and August 1, commencing February 1, 2013. Interest shall accrue on the
unpaid principal at a rate that is 100 basis points higher than the true interest cost of the taxable
general obligation housing improvement area bonds to be issued by the City to finance a portion
of the Housing Improvements (the “Bonds”). Upon issuance of the Bonds, the City Clerk shall
cause to be prepared a finalized schedule of Payments, which schedule shall be attached to this
Resolution as Exhibit A.
2.02. Payments on the Loan Amount will be made solely from Fee Revenues as defined
in the Agreement, together with any amounts received from the Association under Section 6.6 of
the Agreement. Payments shall be applied first to accrued interest, and then to unpaid principal.
Payments on the Loan Amount shall be subordinate to payments on the Bonds.
2.03. The principal sum and all accrued interest payable under this resolution is pre-
payable in whole or in part at any time by the City without premium or penalty. No partial
prepayment shall affect the amount or timing of any other regular payment otherwise required to
be made.
2.04. The Housing Improvements are evidence of an internal borrowing by the City,
which is a limited obligation payable solely from Fee Revenues pledged to the payment hereof
under this resolution together with any amounts received from the Association under the terms of
Section 6.6 of the Agreement. The internal loan for the Housing Improvements shall not be
deemed to constitute a general obligation of the State of Minnesota or any political subdivision
thereof, including, without limitation, the City of St. Louis Park. Neither the State of Minnesota,
nor any political subdivision thereof shall be obligated to pay the principal of or interest on the
Loan Amount or other costs incident hereto except out of Fee Revenues. The City shall have no
obligation to pay any principal amount of the Loan Amount or accrued interest thereon, which
may remain unpaid after the final Payment Date.
2.05. The City Controller is authorized and directed to draw monies from the EDA
Development Fund for disbursements of the Loan Amount, and to credit repayments under this
resolution to the EDA development fund.
2.06. City staff and officials are authorized and directed to execute any collateral
documents and take any other actions necessary to carry out the intent of this resolution.
2.07. The City or EDA may at any time determine to forgive the outstanding principal
amount and accrued interest on the Loan Amount to the extent permissible under law.
Section 3. Effective Date. This resolution is effective upon execution in full of the
Agreement.
EDA Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 7a) Page 5
Subject: Internal Loan for Westwood Villa Association Housing Improvement Area (HIA)
Approved by the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority this 16th day of July, 2012.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the Economic Development Authority
July 16, 2012
Executive Director President
Attest
Secretary
Meeting Date: July 16, 2012
Agenda Item #: 2a
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Recognition of Brenda Nelson’s Years of Service
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Mayor is asked to read certificate and recognize IR Administrator Brenda Nelson for her more
than 13 years of service to the City of St. Louis Park.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
BACKGROUND:
City policy states that employees who retire or resign in good standing with over 10 years of
service will be presented with a framed certificate from the Mayor, City Manager, and City
Council.
Brenda Nelson has resigned after more than 13 years of service to the City’s technology
department. She has accepted a new position with the City of Brooklyn Park. She will be in
attendance at this meeting. The Mayor is asked to read the certificate and present it to her in
recognition of her years of service.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
Attachments: None
Prepared by: Ali Fosse, HR Coordinator
Reviewed by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
Meeting Date: July 16, 2012
Agenda Item #: 2b
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other: Proclamation
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Meadowbrook Collaborative Awareness Month Proclamation – August 2012
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
The Mayor is asked to read and present a Proclamation to proclaim August 2012 Meadowbrook
Collaborative Awareness Month in St. Louis Park.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
BACKGROUND:
In 1993 the Meadowbrook Collaborative was established. The Collaborative addresses quality
of life issues and leverages resources to meet families’ needs in the Meadowbrook neighborhood
in St. Louis Park.
The Meadowbrook Collaborative in the City of St. Louis Park has selected August 2012 as
Meadowbrook Collaborative Awareness Month. The community is invited to help increase
awareness and support the Meadowbrook Collaborative through fundraising, volunteering, and
reinvesting in families and children.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
This proclamation reinforces our City Vision area that St. Louis Park is committed to being a
connected and engaged community.
Attachments: Proclamation
Prepared by: Debbie Fischer, Office Assistant
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 2b) Page 2
Subject: Meadowbrook Collaborative Awareness Month Proclamation – August 2012
PROCLAMATION
Meadowbrook Collaborative Awareness Month in St. Louis Park
August 2012
WHEREAS, The Meadowbrook Collaborative was established in 1993 to address quality
of life issues and leverage resources to meet families’ needs in the Meadowbrook neighborhood
in St. Louis Park; and
WHEREAS, three key stakeholders – St. Louis Park Schools, Park Nicollet Health
Services, and the City of St. Louis Park – committed to the mission of the Meadowbrook
Collaborative, “enhancing the self-direction of the Meadowbrook residents toward the
betterment of their lives in the areas of health, education and safety”; and
WHEREAS, the Meadowbrook Collaborative primary focus is on families and children,
providing culturally relevant services and promoting human rights by eliminating barriers that
prevent youth and their families from equal access to community resources; and
WHEREAS, the Meadowbrook Collaborative is an America’s Promise site, supporting the
5 promises that put children first: 1) caring adults, 2) safe places, 3) a healthy start, 4) an
effective education, and 5) opportunities to help; and
WHEREAS, Park Nicollet Health Services has made it possible for families and children
to more easily access preventative health care, laying the groundwork for initiatives throughout
Park Nicollet’s service area; and
WHEREAS, Meadowbrook was the first site of several St. Louis Park police substations,
and the pilot site for a citywide Crime Free Multi Housing program; and
WHEREAS, the Meadowbrook Collaborative offers extended school learning and
enrichment opportunities, for families and children through St. Louis Park Schools, Parks &
Recreation, and YMCA; and,
WHEREAS, it is acknowledged that Meadowbrook’s many successes are credited to its
positive, working relationships including but not limited to its 3 key stakeholders – the City,
Schools, and Park Nicollet – with many community partners, including STEP, Sunrise Rotary,
YMCA, West Suburban Teen Clinic, Friends of the Arts, Police, Parks & Recreation, the faith
community, local businesses, service organizations and St. Louis Park citizens; and
WHEREAS, the community at large is invited to help increase awareness and participating
in supporting the Meadowbrook Collaborative through fundraising, volunteering, and reinvesting
in families and children in the true spirit that is unique to St. Louis Park.
NOW THEREFORE let it be known, that the Mayor and City Council of the City of St.
Louis Park hereby recognize the Meadowbrook Collaborative and ask all to join in celebrating
this auspicious occasion.
WHEREFORE, I set my hand and cause
the Great Seal of the City of St. Louis Park
to be affixed this 16th day of July 2012.
__________________________________
Jeffrey W. Jacobs, Mayor
Meeting Date: July 16, 2012
Agenda Item #: 2c
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Special Meeting Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Special Session Other:
TITLE:
Outstanding Citizen Award Recognition
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Present awards to three Outstanding Citizens: Ann Thomas, Bob Ramsey and Todd Brewer.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
BACKGROUND:
On October 3, 2011 the City Council approved the Outstanding Citizen Award program with the
following direction:
• The individual may be nominated by anyone.
• Nominations may be made anytime throughout the year.
• Council selects a Task Force of three current board or commission members to review
nominations and make recommendations to Council.
• Nomination information will be on our website.
The award program was publicized starting in January. The Task Force was put in place in
March. Three nominations were reviewed in late April. The recommendation was formulated by
the Task Force in June.
Task Force members Marjorie Douville, Fire Commission; Jim Gainsley, BOZA; and Justin
Kaufman, Housing Authority; recommend the three nominees as Outstanding Citizens.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
This recognition reinforces our Strategic Direction that St. Louis Park is committed to being a
connected and engaged community.
Attachments: Individual Nomination Summaries from Task Force
Prepared by: Bridget Gothberg, Organizational Development Coordinator
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 2c) Page 2
Title: Outstanding Citizen Award Recognition
Date: June 18, 2012
The Outstanding Citizen Award Task Force recommends the following individual:
to the City Council to receive the Outstanding Citizen Award for the following
reasons:
Ann Thomas is extremely dedicated to St. Louis Park. She stared “Day One” which is an event
put together to welcome high school students back to school in a unique and exciting way to
show our teenagers they were valued and that school was important. Throughout the years she
has raised money for the theater at the high school, found money for Dollars for Scholars, helped
the Girl Scouts sell cookies. She chaired the All Night Party. She has stayed involved and
volunteering for youth causes event though her children are grown. She is also a volunteer for
Parktacular. The responsibilities she takes on include: working on getting all the door prizes,
finding the sponsorships, attending every committee meeting and encouraging others. Ann
brings spirit and positivity to the Parktacular committee. No matter what the challenges are she
“gets it done”.
The Outstanding Citizen Award Task Force
_____________________________
Marjorie Douville
_____________________________
Jim Gainsley
_____________________________
Justin Kaufman
Ann Thomas
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 2c) Page 3
Title: Outstanding Citizen Award Recognition
Date: June 18, 2012
The Outstanding Citizen Award Task Force recommends the following individual:
to the City Council to receive the Outstanding Citizen Award for the following
reasons:
In is 40 years of living in St. Louis Park Bob Ramsey has helped start Children First and is an
Asset Champion. He chaired Book Mark in the Park, found funding for Book Mark in the Park,
and chaired the committee for five years. He worked with Friends of the Arts on pursing a
community poet. He volunteers every year at Day One. He was chair of the Senior Summit a
Lenox to bring community elders together to talk with community leaders on issues that are
important to them. He has worked with Parktacular and is a Senior Ambassador, along with his
wife Joyce, for St. Louis Park. Bob is a member of the NORC (Nurturing our Retired Citizens)
Senior Consumer Advisory Committee. He is active in the Successful Aging in the Park group
through volunteering at Park Nicollet. Bob writes columns for the Sun Sailor that are often
about the community and/or the perspective of a community member—these are upbeat and
inspirational. All of this is volunteer work to better the City of St. Louis Park. Bob Ramsey
truly does outstanding work for the City of St. Louis Park. We are a better place because of Bob
Ramsey._______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
The Outstanding Citizen Award Task Force
_____________________________
Marjorie Douville
_____________________________
Jim Gainsley
_____________________________
Justin Kaufman
Bob Ramsey
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 2c) Page 4
Title: Outstanding Citizen Award Recognition
Date: June 18, 2012
The Outstanding Citizen Award Task Force recommends the following individual:
to the City Council to receive the Outstanding Citizen Award for the following
reasons:
Todd Brewer is a local business owner and Rotarian. He helped bring the Climbing Rock to the
Westwood Nature Center. He unloads holiday goods for STEP, he gifts families in need, and
uses his own truck to make delivery of bigger items (beds or furniture) to those in need. Todd
has given, through his family foundation, funding to support Meadowbrook academic support for
youth in grades k-8. He has also donated bikes and fixed bikes at no charge for Meadowbrook
children in need. When he learned two school-aged children were sharing sleeping quarters with
an uncle, sleeping in shifts, Todd donated, delivered, and set up bunk beds, dressers, and clean
sheets so the kids could get a good night’s rest. He has given money so a young teen could go
the YMCA Boundary Waters camp.
The Outstanding Citizen Award Task Force
_____________________________
Marjorie Douville
_____________________________
Jim Gainsley
_____________________________
Justin Kaufman
Todd Brewer
Meeting Date: July 16, 2012
Agenda Item #: 3a
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
JUNE 11, 2012
The meeting convened at 6:30 p.m.
Councilmembers present: Mayor Pro Tem Susan Sanger, Steve Hallfin, Anne Mavity (arrived at
6:33 p.m.), Julia Ross (arrived at 6:38 p.m.), Sue Santa, and Jake Spano.
Councilmembers absent: Mayor Jeff Jacobs.
Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), Deputy City Manager/Director of Human
Resources (Ms. Deno), Controller (Mr. Swanson), Finance Supervisor (Mr. Heintz), City
Engineer (Mr. Brink), Director of Public Works (Mr. Rardin), Engineering Project Manager (Mr.
Olson), Communications Coordinator (Mr. Zwilling), Planner (Mr. Walther), Organizational
Development Coordinator (Ms. Gothberg), Administration Department Intern (Mr. French), and
Recording Secretary (Ms. Hughes).
1. Future Study Session Agenda Planning – June 18 and June 25, 2012
Mr. Harmening presented the proposed special study session agenda for June 18, 2012, and the
proposed study session agenda for June 25, 2012.
Councilmember Santa requested an update regarding the insurance being offered by the National
League.
Mr. Harmening explained this item will be brought back to Council in July or August for formal
action.
2. 2013 Budget Discussion
Mr. Harmening presented the staff report and introduced Ray French, an intern working in the
Administration Department.
Ms. Deno explained that staff is beginning to prepare the 2013 budget which will include a full
review of past expenditures as well as a review of the City’s fees compared with other cities.
She stated the 2013 budget will be prepared with an eye toward business as usual and to continue
the City’s high standards of service delivery with Vision in the forefront. She indicated that all
five of the City’s union contracts are set with a wage adjustment of 2%; in addition, a wellness
benefit increase of $10 has already been approved. She stated that the 2013 budget will include
an increase of $20 per month for benefit contributions and the budget assumes a 9% increase in
rates for 2013.
Mr. Heintz reviewed the 2011-2013 budget analysis snapshot for the General Fund and Park and
Recreation Fund and noted the total gap before adjustments is $75,491, the proposed benefit
contribution increases total $77,090, and salary adjustments total $437,384, for a total 2013
budget gap of $589,965 compared to 2012. He indicated the budget assumes no use of the City’s
fund balance in 2013 and continues the unwinding of the Police and Fire pension transfer of
$50,000 per year, as well as unwinding of the Cable TV transfer starting in 2013 of $25,000 per
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 3a) Page 2
Subject: Study Session Minutes of June 11, 2012
year in order to help the Cable TV fund get closer to financial stability. He noted these transfers
are consistent with the City’s Long Range Financial Management Plan. He also noted that the
community survey has been included for 2013 and will be funded through the Development
Fund. He added that no additional expenses for environmental programs are included and it is
assumed this program will be funded through the solid waste fund rather than the General Fund.
Councilmember Ross requested further information regarding the budget impact of future
development and the loss of Novartis.
Mr. Swanson stated that increased development and redevelopment will generate more permit
revenue and will show up under projections in 2013. He indicated the City expects to see some
impact to its water and utility funds from the loss of Novartis but is not anticipating any
significant change with that loss. He added that staff will review the utility funds toward the end
of 2012 to determine if any adjustments are needed to ensure the sustainability of those funds; in
addition, Council will review utility rates in August.
Mayor Pro Tem Sanger asked if the 2013 budget will include additional money for the feasibility
study for the community center.
Mr. Harmening explained that this item is not currently reflected in the 2013 budget but will be
added back in, noting that these types of costs typically get folded into the overall project cost.
Mayor Pro Tem Sanger requested that data be provided to Council regarding the wellness benefit
and the efficacy of this benefit.
Ms. Deno stated this is a longer-term initiative and data will be provided to Council.
Councilmember Mavity asked if any funds have been set aside for consulting work related to
light rail should the need arise.
Mr. Harmening replied that this has been reflected in the Development Fund budget and not the
General Fund or Park and Recreation Fund.
Mr. Heintz presented the preliminary CIP funding source summary and five year CIP, noting that
the summary includes other funding sources such as the County, State, or Met Council.
Councilmember Mavity stated that the City has been experiencing significant development and a
police officer was recently added because of the increased activity at West End. She requested
information on how a determination is made whether to add additional police and fire to meet the
City’s needs.
Mr. Harmening advised that last year, Council agreed to do some long range planning relative to
the City’s police and fire needs and an RFP is currently out to retain a consultant to help the City
understand long-term changes from a redevelopment and demographic perspective and how
those changes will impact public safety.
Mr. Heintz presented a summary of the City’s long-range financial management plan, which is
used to make sure the City’s funds are sustainable and which includes assumptions for inflation
and interest. He stated the pavement management fund includes a $.50 per utility franchise fee
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 3a) Page 3
Subject: Study Session Minutes of June 11, 2012
increase in 2013. He noted that franchise fees were increased by $.75 two years ago and staff
will continue to work on this and come back to Council with a recommendation.
Mr. Harmening pointed out the City funds the pavement management fund entirely with
franchise fees and does not impose any special assessments for these types of improvements.
Councilmember Santa stated it would be helpful for Council to have a further general
understanding of what it means to be healthy as it relates to the City’s fund balance.
Mr. Swanson explained the City uses the State Auditor’s fund balance position and targets a fund
balance percentage of 35-50%.
It was the consensus of the City Council that the general direction outlined for the 2013 budget is
in line with Council expectations.
Mayor Pro Tem Sanger thanked staff for all their work on the budget.
3. Environment/Sustainability Task Force Application Review
Ms. Deno presented the staff report and 25 applications received for the task force. She noted
that no address information for the applicants was included in the public agenda packet.
Mayor Pro Tem Sanger noted that Council will need to decide if it wants to narrow the list down
from 25 applicants and if so, what criteria should be used to ensure the task force has the
appropriate mix of residents.
Ms. Gothberg advised that research states that 8-15 persons on a task force will provide the most
effective d ynamics and it will be easier to keep the group on task.
Mayor Pro Tem Sanger indicated that when the community facility task force was appointed,
Council did not narrow the group down and appointed 21 people because not everyone will show
up to all of the meetings. She requested that Council refer to each of the applicants by the letter
associated with their name on the map provided by staff.
Mr. Harmening stated that of the 25 applications, 13 are men, 12 are women, and their
geographic locations are well disbursed throughout the City with a small cluster in Minikahda
Vista. He added that a diversity of interests appear to be represented in the applications.
Councilmember Santa felt the number should be narrowed down particularly since the task force
will be of limited duration.
Councilmember Ross agreed.
Mayor Pro Tem Sanger recited an email from Mayor Jacobs stating he did not have any strong
preference to reject any of the applicants.
Councilmember Spano felt that 25 members would be difficult to manage.
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 3a) Page 4
Subject: Study Session Minutes of June 11, 2012
Councilmember Hallfin felt that 10-15 members would be better and liked the idea of having a
set number of representatives from each ward as well as a set number of representatives to serve
at large.
Ms. Deno stated that staff could develop a score sheet that Council can use to help guide Council
through the list in order to make its selections.
It was the consensus of the City Council to review the 25 applications received for the
Environment/Sustainability Task Force and to rank their selections on a scale of 1 to 25, with 1
being the highest and 25 being the lowest.
4. Project Update – Highway 7/Louisiana Avenue Interchange Project
Mr. Olson presented the staff report and advised that the City’s $3 million TED Grant
application was successful and will help with financing of the project. He explained that
appraisal activities have started as part of the right of way process and the City will be ready to
begin making offers in July or early August. He stated the City Attorney has recommended that
the City should initiate the condemnation process at about the same time that the initial offers are
made to the property owners. He noted that the City will still go through negotiations with
property owners. He added that seven parcels are being acquired and all parcels are represented
by different owners. He indicated that Mn/DOT has provided comments on the design and has
asked the City to do more soil borings on the project; Mn/DOT has indicated this additional
testing could result in cost savings of approximately $200,000-$300,000 if deeper soil borings
are taken. He added that the consultants agree with Mn/DOT’s recommendation.
Mr. Rardin advised that the project costs include estimated costs for underground power lines of
approximately $600,000 which is included in the funding gap of $3,868,000. He noted that no
funding source has been determined to pay for these underground power lines. He also noted
that the City can order Xcel Energy to install the underground power lines, but Xcel Energy may
or may not choose to assess that cost to properties through a tariff process. He stated the City is
currently negotiating with Xcel Energy on the underground power lines and plans are being
developed, but Xcel Energy’s standard is to install above ground relocation of power lines. He
stated if Xcel Energy decides to assess the undergrounding cost, it would go through the
Minnesota Public Utilities Commission for approval but staff is uncertain who determines the
area of benefitting properties.
It was the consensus of the City Council to direct staff to further investigate the process for
installing underground power lines in the project area, including responsibility for payment of
the additional cost to install underground power lines as well as determining benefitting
properties.
Councilmember Ross asked if fiber has been installed under Highway 7.
Mr. Olson agreed to check with Mr. Pires regarding whether fiber and/or conduit has been
installed in this area.
Mayor Pro Tem Sanger requested further information regarding the possibility of reimbursing
property owners if Xcel Energy decides to impose a special assessment for the underground
power lines, assuming the area to be assessed is a narrow area.
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 3a) Page 5
Subject: Study Session Minutes of June 11, 2012
It was the consensus of the City Council to direct staff to continue moving forward with this
project.
5. Pedestrian and Bicycle System Implementation Plan and Policy Review
Mr. Rardin presented the staff report.
Councilmember Santa reiterated her request to remove the bikeway listed in item #11 on Exhibit
G and to swap that for the sidewalk listed in item #145. She stated that residents in this area do
not feel safe, particularly since there are many residents in this area who are not able-bodied and
who need to share the road in their wheelchairs or walkers. She felt the wrong message would
be sent if the City installed a bikeway first and waited four years to put in a sidewalk.
Councilmember Mavity felt that a bikeway in this location was important and the addition of
bikeway signing would be helpful.
Councilmember Ross agreed with Councilmember Santa and stated there are significant safety
issues in this area.
Mr. Rardin agreed to change the construction year to 2013 for item #145.
Councilmember Mavity requested that the City move up the date for installation of the sidewalk
segment between Ottawa and Wooddale on Morningside Road (#134 - coordinate installation
with Edina). She indicated that the City of Edina has asked the City to install a sidewalk on the
north side of the street. She also requested the City accelerate the installation of sidewalks all
along Morningside Road because this is a high traffic street with a lot of children in the area
(#133 - moved from 2022 to 2015). She requested the installation of sidewalks along 40th Street
be moved up as well (#128).
Mr. Rardin stated the City has been coordinating sidewalk installation with the City of Edina.
He indicated that 40th Street (#128) would be rescheduled for completion in 2015.
Mayor Pro Tem Sanger requested that item #103 and item #104 on Exhibit G be moved up from
the current construction year of 2020.
Mr. Rardin suggested that item #103 and item #104 be moved up to 2016. He added that item
#87 should match the construction year for item #104.
Mayor Pro Tem Sanger requested that item #7 be pushed back and not made a high priority
(moved from 2013 to 2020). She noted that she would be okay with the installation of bikeway
signs.
Councilmember Mavity expressed concern regarding 39th Street leading to Minikahda Vista Park
and requested that item #126 and item #127 be moved up.
Mr. Brink agreed to review these items further.
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 3a) Page 6
Subject: Study Session Minutes of June 11, 2012
Mayor Pro Tem Sanger requested that West Lake Street (item #53) be revised from a bike lane to
a bikeway from Minnetonka Boulevard to Walker Street.
Councilmember Ross requested that sidewalks be added on the south side of Cedar Lake Road
(item #8) and stated this area is used by pedestrians waiting for the bus and people end up
standing in the street during the winter.
Mayor Pro Tem Sanger requested Council provide Mr. Rardin with any additional deletions or
additions to the 10-year CIP. She also requested that Council be provided with cost estimates
and funding sources before determining if the ten-year term for the CIP is appropriate.
Mr. Rardin stated that further information will be presented to Council at its July 9th meeting.
Council discussed possible removal of on street parking to accommodate on street biking.
Mr. Rardin stated that staff will identify problem areas if on street parking were removed for
further discussion with Council. He pointed out that Exhibit B1 needs to be corrected as part of
the creek remeander plan and explained that the earlier plan included a bridge to connect over to
Louisiana Court and another bridge to the north side of the creek leading west. He stated there is
currently no proposal to have a connector to Louisiana Court, and there is currently only one
bridge in the creek remeander plan. He noted the City could add this connector later if desired.
Councilmember Mavity previously requested a sidewalk be added from the MSC on the south
side of Oxford Street east to Louisiana Ave. Mr. Rardin stated that he also had incorrect
information related to the proposed trail from Twin Lakes Park through Benilde to the Hwy 100
frontage Rd. That proposed link should be revised to provide for the existing Twin Lakes trail to
be extended only to the dead end at the cul-de-sac at the south end of Westridge Lane. He
explained that the City has an easement only from Westridge Lane south along the east property
line of Benilde. In past involvements, Benilde was not willing to provide an easement through
their property to the Hwy 100 frontage road.
Mr. Zwilling advised that staff is working on an outline for the public process, which will be
presented to Council this summer.
6. Communications/Meeting Check-In (Verbal)
Mr. Harmening stated that a member of the Human Rights Commission is interested in
proposing that the Human Rights Commission sponsor a forum with an organization such as
OutFront Minnesota to educate the community about why the marriage amendment should not
pass. He indicated this forum can be done provided the City does not spend any money on the
forum. He added the City cannot spend money to actively lobby against the marriage
amendment.
Mayor Pro Tem Sanger suggested that the Human Rights Commission invite someone from the
opposing side to attend the forum to have a point/counterpoint forum. Mr. Harmening clarified
that this approach is not what is being proposed.
Councilmember Mavity stated it will be important to make sure the City is in full compliance
with the letter and intent of the law.
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 3a) Page 7
Subject: Study Session Minutes of June 11, 2012
Councilmember Santa stated the City Council has already passed a resolution stating its position
on the matter and agreed with Councilmember Mavity.
Councilmember Spano stated he had no problem with the Human Rights Commission sponsoring
this forum.
It was the consensus of the City Council to state its agreement with the Human Rights
Commission’s possible sponsorship of a forum intended to educate the community about why
the marriage amendment should not pass, as long as the forum is in compliance with state law.
Mr. Harmening stated that Councilmembers can use the fire station’s workout facility and asked
whether he should bring back a policy allowing for this. It was agreed that he should do so.
Councilmember Ross advised that a resident from Hamilton House recently contacted her
expressing concern about the number of residents who smoke and its impact on residents. She
stated the resident wants to know if there is anything the City can do.
Mr. Harmening agreed to check on this and report back to Council.
Mayor Pro Tem Sanger advised that she has been contacted about a number of issues at Menorah
Plaza with residents being disruptive and sometimes violent and whether the City can do
anything.
Mr. Harmening agreed to work with the Police Department regarding these issues.
The meeting adjourned at 9:41 p.m.
Written Reports provided and documented for recording purposes only:
7. 2013 – 2018 Solid Waste Collection Program
______________________________________ ______________________________________
Nancy Stroth, City Clerk Susan Sanger, Mayor Pro Tem
Meeting Date: July 16, 2012
Agenda Item #: 3b
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL STUDY SESSION
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
JUNE 18, 2012
The meeting convened at 6:30 p.m.
Councilmembers present: Mayor Pro Tem Susan Sanger, Steve Hallfin (arrived at 6:44 p.m.),
Anne Mavity, Julia Ross (arrived at 6:36 p.m.), and Jake Spano.
Councilmembers absent: Mayor Jeff Jacobs and Councilmember Sue Santa.
Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), Deputy City Manager/Director of Human
Resources (Ms. Deno), Communications Coordinator (Mr. Zwilling), Controller (Mr. Swanson),
Finance Supervisor (Mr. Heintz), Director of Public Works (Mr. Rardin), Environmental
Coordinator (Mr. Vaughan), Utilities Superintendent (Mr. Anderson), Administration Intern (Mr.
French), and Recording Secretary (Ms. Hughes).
Guest: David Mol, CPA (HLB Tautges Redpath, Ltd.).
1. 2011 Financial Statements – Auditors Discussion and Review
Mr. Swanson presented the staff report and introduced David Mol, CPA.
Mr. Mol presented the City’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for 2011 together with the
accompanying reports issued at the conclusion of the audit, including an opinion on the fair
presentation of the financial statements, a report on internal controls, a report on compliance with
the Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Political Subdivisions, and a report on
communication to those charged with governance. He advised the audit resulted in a clean, or
unqualified, opinion on the 2011 financial statements. He indicated the City received a
Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting in 2010 and the 2011 financial
statements will also be submitted. He reviewed the report of internal controls and stated one
item was noted requiring adjustment related to revenue recognition. He explained that this was a
timing issue related to grant monies received in 2011 that had not been earned requiring the
revenue to be backed out to match with earnings and the auditors were not overly concerned
about this issue. He then reviewed the report on compliance with the Minnesota Legal
Compliance Audit Guide and explained the auditors selected a sample of transactions to test for
compliance and there were no findings of non-compliance. He discussed the communication
with those charged with governance and explained the auditors are required to communicate
certain items not included elsewhere in the CAFR and stated the most significant finding related
to the City’s OPEB obligation based on actuarial valuation. He stated the auditors are also
required to communicate misstatements or adjustments as a result of the audit and one material
item was found related to grant revenue as well as two immaterial misstatements that do not need
to be corrected in order for the auditors to issue a clean opinion. He added there were no
disagreements with management during the audit and no difficulties were encountered in
performing the audit. He presented a summary of financial activity in each fund and a summary
of constraints on the City’s fund balances, noting that the fund balance of $63 million includes
restricted funds. He also presented a summary of the City’s General Fund monthly cash balances
and advised the City’s fund balance policy requires the City to maintain unassigned funds in the
range of 35-50% and the City’s unassigned fund balance was 46% during 2011. He presented a
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 3b) Page 2
Subject: Special Study Session Minutes of June 18, 2012
summary of the City’s debt service funds, sewer utility, water utility, and solid waste funds, as
well as a history of the City’s tax levy and tax rates, noting the City’s 2012 levy increase was
1.7% compared to 3.9% in 2011. He explained the City’s tax rates are dependent on valuations
resulting in tax rates going up because valuations went down. He stated the City’s net
contribution to the fiscal disparities pool was 5.1% or $3.2 million. He added the unallotment
for the Market Value Homestead Credit was $755,000 in 2011 and the City has not received
Local Government Aid since 2003.
Councilmember Mavity noted that sewer utility revenues have been trending above expenses and
asked if the City anticipates any large expenses that will require adjustment to these rates.
Mr. Heintz explained that Council will further review the utility funds in August and staff is
currently looking at the sewer fund to help out the water fund consistent with the City’s long-
range financial plan for all four utilities. He stated the Met Council charge represents the biggest
expense in the sewer utility fund and assumptions regarding future increases are being reviewed.
Council discussed the City’s tax levy and corresponding tax rates.
Mr. Swanson indicated changes in the Market Value Homestead Credit program resulted in a
loss of 3.5% of the City’s tax capacity and increased the City’s contribution to the fiscal
disparities pool; those changes, coupled with the valuation decreases, resulted in a 10% change
in the City’s tax rate.
Mayor Pro Tem Sanger requested an update on the State’s analysis of the fiscal disparities
program.
Mr. Harmening advised the State’s report was submitted to the legislature in February but was
tabled until the next legislative session.
Mr. Harmening requested the City Council recognize the efforts of Mr. Swanson, Mr. Heintz,
and the Finance Department staff for their great work.
Mayor Pro Tem Sanger recessed the Special Study Session at 7:02 p.m. in order to convene the
Economic Development Authority and City Council meetings.
Mayor Pro Tem Sanger reconvened the Special Study Session at 9:17 p.m.
2. Storm Water Follow Up – Bass Lake Improvements
Mr. Rardin presented the staff report, history regarding Bass Lake, and proposed improvement
options for Bass Lake. He indicated that option #2 provides restoration of the functional needs
of the water body.
Councilmember Mavity thanked staff for their report and asked if option #2 represents the most
viable and feasible option for Bass Lake. She also requested that the goals reflect the
environmental goal of clean water.
Mr. Rardin replied that option #2 is the most viable option for managing the quantity and quality
of the storm water system.
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 3b) Page 3
Subject: Special Study Session Minutes of June 18, 2012
Councilmember Mavity indicated the remeander of Minnehaha Creek is currently underway and
noted that in the past, it worked to straighten the creek but the straightening did not work for the
natural flow of the creek, resulting in the remeander. She urged the City to make sure the
improvements at Bass Lake do not result in a similar situation in twenty years and to make sure
the project is managed in way that works best so the City does not have to come back and fix it
later.
Mr. Rardin stated there is no guarantee that improvements will last indefinitely but as long as
routine maintenance is performed, the improvements should be sustainable. He added the City
has done a significant amount of work with respect to erosion control and prevention of sediment
for both quantity and water quality. He indicated this project is not currently in the CIP and will
require further discussion with Council, including a discussion regarding rates.
Mr. Harmening indicated the soonest this project would begin is 2014.
It was the consensus of the City Council to direct staff to pursue Bass Lake improvement option
#2 – functional restoration.
The meeting adjourned at 9:35 p.m.
______________________________________ ______________________________________
Nancy Stroth, City Clerk Susan Sanger, Mayor Pro Tem
Meeting Date: July 16, 2012
Agenda Item #: 3c
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
JUNE 18, 2012
1. Call to Order
Mayor Pro Tem Sanger called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
Councilmembers present: Mayor Pro Tem Susan Sanger, Steve Hallfin, Anne Mavity, Julia
Ross, and Jake Spano.
Councilmembers absent: Mayor Jeff Jacobs and Councilmember Sue Santa.
Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), Deputy City Manager/Director of Human
Resources (Ms. Deno), City Attorney (Ms. Poehler), City Clerk (Ms. Stroth), Controller (Mr.
Swanson), Finance Supervisor (Mr. Heintz), Director of Public Works (Mr. Rardin), Engineering
Project Manager (Mr. Sullivan), Director of Inspections (Mr. Hoffman), Inspection Services
Manager (Ms. Boettcher), Environmental Coordinator (Mr. Vaughan), Communications
Coordinator (Mr. Zwilling), Administration Intern (Mr. French), and Recording Secretary (Ms.
Hughes).
Guest: David Mol, CPA (HLB Tautges Redpath, Ltd.)
1a. Pledge of Allegiance
1b. Roll Call
2. Presentations
2a. 2011 Financial Statements – Auditors Presentation and Discussion
Mr. Swanson presented the staff report and introduced David Mol, CPA. He reminded
Council that the auditors work for the City Council and not the City and are here to
answer the City Council’s questions.
Mr. Mol presented the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) and
accompanying reports issued at the conclusion of the audit, including an opinion on the
fair presentation of the financial statements, a report on internal controls, a report on
compliance with the Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Political
Subdivisions, and a report on communication to those charged with governance. He
advised the City has received a clean, or unqualified, audit opinion on the City’s 2011
financial statements. He stated the City received an award for excellence in financial
reporting from the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) for its 2010
financial statements and the City intends to submit its 2011 CAFR as well. He indicated
the report on internal controls is used to gain an understanding of the City’s internal
controls and includes testing of samples to confirm controls are in place. He reported that
one audit adjustment was noted relative to revenue recognition. He stated the Minnesota
Legal Compliance Guide requires that a sample of transactions be tested for compliance
with statutory requirements and there were no findings of non-compliance. He stated the
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 3c) Page 2
Subject: City Council Meeting Minutes of June 18, 2012
auditors are required to issue a report on communication to those charged with
governance and there were no changes made to the City’s policies during 2011, the
auditors noted the City’s OPEB obligation as an estimate based on actuarial valuations,
two immaterial uncorrected misstatements and one material corrected adjustment was
identified during the audit, there were no disagreements with management during the
audit and no difficulties were encountered in performing the City’s 2011 audit.
Mayor Pro Tem Sanger expressed the City Council’s thanks to Mr. Mol for their work on
the 2011 audit. She also expressed the City Council’s thanks to Mr. Swanson, Mr.
Heintz, and the Finance Department staff for their efforts on behalf of the City.
3. Approval of Minutes
3a. Study Session Meeting Minutes May 29, 2012
The minutes were approved as presented.
3b. Special City Council/Closed Executive Session Meeting Minutes June 4, 2012.
The minutes were approved as presented.
3c. City Council Meeting Minutes June 4, 2012
The minutes were approved as presented.
4. Approval of Agenda and Items on Consent Calendar
NOTE: The Consent Calendar lists those items of business which are considered to be routine and/or which need no
discussion. Consent items are acted upon by one motion. If discussion is desired by either a Councilmember or a
member of the audience, that item may be moved to an appropriate section of the regular agenda for discussion.
4a. Designate Bituminous Roadways, Inc. the lowest responsible bidder and authorize
execution of a contract with the firm in the amount of $337,515.00 for the 2012
MSA Street Improvement Project, Project No. 2011-1100.
4b. Adopt Resolution No. 12-079 authorizing “No Parking” signs along the segment
of Highway 169 Frontage Road that Mn/DOT is turning back to the City between
22nd Street and 23rd Street; and the removal of the existing “Stop” signs at the
intersection of Highway 169 Frontage Road at 22nd Street, 22nd Lane and 23rd
Street.
4c. Adopt Resolution No. 12-080 ordering the abatement of the hazardous building
located at 9920 Wayzata Boulevard.
4d. Approve a Temporary On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for Church of the
Holy Family at 5900 & 5925 West Lake Street for August 18, 2012.
4e. Approve a Temporary On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for St. Louis Park
Public Schools Foundation, Box 26393, in St. Louis Park for an event to be held
on September 29, 2012, at Warehouse Winery.
4f. Adopt Resolution No. 12-081 authorizing final payment in the amount of
$117,561.05 and accepting work for the 2011 Local Street Rehabilitation -
Pavement Management Area 7 Repair with Valley Paving, Inc. Project No. 2010-
1000, City Contract No. 46-11.
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 3c) Page 3
Subject: City Council Meeting Minutes of June 18, 2012
4g. Adopt Resolution No. 12-082 accepting a donation from George and Pat Foulkes
in the amount of $1,000 for benches to be installed by the new pond area in front
of Westwood Hills Nature Center.
4h. Adopt Resolution No. 12-083 revising parking restrictions along the North
Frontage Road of County Road 25 from Ottawa Avenue to Raleigh Avenue.
4i. Approve for Filing Vendor Claims.
4j. Approve for Filing Housing Authority Minutes of April 9, 2012.
It was moved by Councilmember Mavity, seconded by Councilmember Hallfin, to
approve the Agenda and items listed on the Consent Calendar; and to waive reading of
all resolutions and ordinances.
The motion passed 5-0 (Mayor Jacobs and Councilmember Santa absent).
5. Boards and Commissions – None
6. Public Hearings – None
7. Requests, Petitions, and Communications from the Public – None
8. Resolutions, Ordinances, Motions and Discussion Items
8a. Project Report: Traffic Signal Project - Park Center Boulevard at Park
Summit - Project #2012-1306. Resolution No. 12-084
Mr. Rardin presented the staff report and introduced Jack Sullivan, the City’s
Engineering Project Manager hired in February to assist the City with its CIP.
Mr. Sullivan explained the City’s traffic study recommended installation of a traffic
signal at Park Center Boulevard and 36th Street in conjunction with the Park Summit
improvements currently underway. He stated the traffic report recommended that access
to Park Summit be consolidated with the access at the Parkshore Assisted Living site as
well as to consolidate the Target access. He advised that in addition to the proposed
access consolidation, the project will include installation of a signalized intersection with
better pedestrian facilities, a 2” mill and overlay, as well as a landscaped center median
and new pavement striping. He stated that approvals for the project were required from
the Park Summit redevelopment, Target, and Mn/DOT and an agreement with Target will
be presented to Council on July 16 th that provides for cost sharing of improvements. He
advised that staff reached agreement with Park Summit and Target to allow the City to
keep the road and all access open during construction scheduled to begin in early August.
He noted that some traffic delays are anticipated during the milling and paving operations
and the project will be completed prior to the holiday shopping season. He stated that the
cost of the project is $634,500 and Park Summit and Target will share 50% of the signal
and access costs. He reviewed the project timeline, noting that Park Summit will be
opening and occupying in early 2013 and it is anticipated the intersection will be installed
in time for their spring open house.
Councilmember Mavity stated that the location of the proposed signal is a short distance
from the signal at 36th Street and asked how the City will assure that the two signals will
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 3c) Page 4
Subject: City Council Meeting Minutes of June 18, 2012
work in concert so traffic flows smoothly through the area. She also requested
confirmation that the proposed improvements will make this area safer for pedestrians.
Mr. Sullivan stated the intersection has been designed to make sure the two signals are
synchronized and noted the signals can be adjusted later if timing issues become
apparent. He indicated the signal improvements will include an audible pedestrian signal
with countdown timers as well as white zebra stripes in the crosswalk.
Councilmember Mavity urged the City to have a plan in place during construction to
ensure pedestrians are able to use the crosswalk safely.
Mr. Sullivan noted Councilmember Mavity’s concern and stated the City will work with
the contractor to make sure this area remains safe during construction.
Councilmember Hallfin asked if the City considered installing a roundabout in this
location and requested information on cost differentials between a roundabout and
signalized intersection.
Mr. Sullivan explained that due to the limited right-of-way available in this location, staff
felt a roundabout would not work in this location; in addition, because of the
intersection’s close proximity to 36th Street, staff felt that coordinating two signalized
intersections was a better way to manage traffic.
Mr. Rardin indicated that a roundabout costs approximately $100,000 and a signalized
intersection costs approximately $150,000-$250,000.
Councilmember Ross asked if any changes are planned for this area with respect to bike
lanes that would enhance a biker’s ability to get to Target and other areas.
Mr. Rardin indicated that nothing has been built into this project for bike lanes.
Councilmember Ross urged the City to consider any bike lane improvements during
construction.
It was moved by Councilmember Mavity, seconded by Councilmember Spano, to adopt
Resolution No. 12-084 Accepting the Project Report, Establishing Improvement Project
No. 2012-1306, Approving Plans and Specifications and Authorizing Advertisement for
Bids for Improvement Project No. 2012-1306.
The motion passed 5-0 (Mayor Jacobs and Councilmember Santa absent).
8b. Constitutional Amendment – Photo Identification for Voting.
Resolution No. 12-085
Ms. Stroth presented the staff report proposed resolution in opposition to the proposed
Constitutional Amendment relating to photo identification for voting. She recited the
language to be included on the November 6, 2012 ballot question.
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 3c) Page 5
Subject: City Council Meeting Minutes of June 18, 2012
Ms. Aggie Leitheiser, 7614 Edgebrook Drive, appeared before the City Council on behalf
of the St. Louis Park League of Women Voters (“League”) and stated the League
supports the City Council’s opposition to the proposed Constitutional Amendment that
will make it harder for people to exercise their right to vote. She indicated it has not yet
been determined what will be accepted as government-issued ID under the Constitutional
Amendment. She stated the State must issue ID at no charge to voters, however, voters
will need to purchase documentation to prove their eligibility for voting. She also stated
that voters without government-issued ID, or who forget their ID on election day, may
cast a provisional ballot to be counted later when the voter goes to the local election
office, resulting in a local cost with no provision for reimbursement to cities. She
indicated that absentee balloting may be crippled with no eligibility verification and
noted that 11% of voters in the 2010 election registered to vote on election day. She
added the League does not feel that voter fraud is an issue in Minnesota and the League
salutes the City Council’s commitment to the community.
Ms. Joanne Boyer, 3041 Quebec Avenue South, appeared before the City Council and
urged the City Council to oppose the Constitutional Amendment. She stated that
statistics do not support the alleged charge of voter fraud. She stated that Minnesota
recently went through an election recount for U.S. Senate and Governor and there was no
fraud alleged in either case. She indicated there does not appear to have been any
widespread grassroots movement demanding this and the Constitutional Amendment, if
passed, will keep eligible voters from casting their votes in the future. She expressed
concern that the Constitutional Amendment requirements are unclear about what will be
required for valid ID and felt this Constitutional Amendment should anger Minnesotans
from a common sense point of view. She encouraged residents to visit the League of
Women Voters website at www.lwvmn.org to learn more about the Constitutional
Amendment. She stated the Constitutional Amendment would change same day voter
registration, absentee balloting, and provisional balloting and will require cash-strapped
local governments to spend money to address a problem that does not exist. She urged
the City Council, St. Louis Park residents, and all Minnesotans to reject the
Constitutional Amendment because it is uncalled for, unnecessary, discriminates, and
represents a step backward in getting more people to the polls to exercise their
Constitutional right to vote.
Councilmember Ross stated the Constitution is about protecting people and not taking
rights away and the proposed Constitutional Amendment will impact many people. She
indicated the sponsors of the Constitutional Amendment have talked about government
involvement in people’s lives and about being fiscally responsible and the Constitutional
Amendment will be neither fiscally responsible nor will it result in less government in
people’s lives. She stated the cost to cities, particularly smaller cities, will be significant.
She stated she is concerned about the potential corruption of provisional ballots and felt
there were too many loopholes in the Constitutional Amendment and too many processes
that have not been clearly thought through. She added this Constitutional Amendment
would affect those people without ID as well as those people who have lost their ID or
who recently had a name or address change. She stated she cannot and will not support
this Constitutional Amendment.
Councilmember Spano agreed with Councilmember Ross. He stated there are
approximately 45,000 Minnesota residents who vote by mail because they live in remote
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 3c) Page 6
Subject: City Council Meeting Minutes of June 18, 2012
areas of the State or are service members serving overseas and a substantially equivalent
clause of this Constitutional Amendment would render their votes uncounted. He noted
that state voting experts have indicated this Constitutional Amendment would not have
fixed any previous problems. He felt the Constitutional Amendment was poorly thought
out and Constitutional voting rights should be protected. He stated he will support the
City Council resolution to oppose the Constitutional Amendment.
Councilmember Hallfin stated this Constitutional Amendment is a solution looking for a
problem. He indicated he voted via absentee ballot while serving in the military and if
the Constitutional Amendment passes, the country’s service members’ votes may not be
counted. He stated he will support the City Council resolution to oppose the
Constitutional Amendment.
Councilmember Mavity agreed with all of the earlier comments and felt the League has
done a great job of outlining the issue. She stated it does not make sense to pass a
Constitutional Amendment referencing technology that is becoming old school. She
stated she opposes the Constitutional Amendment and will support the City Council
resolution.
Mayor Pro Tem Sanger agreed with all the comments made and stated there is no
documented voter fraud in Minnesota of the type that would be addressed by this
Constitutional Amendment. She felt the Constitutional Amendment would
disenfranchise those people who move frequently or who do not have IDs. She indicated
the Constitutional Amendment provides a ten day grace period for presenting valid ID,
but it can take up to seven weeks to receive a valid ID from the State. She felt it was
unrealistic to expect that this ten day grace period will solve the problem and if the
Constitutional Amendment is passed, it will likely create longer delays for people to
receive their IDs from the State. She stated she will support the City Council resolution
to oppose the Constitutional Amendment.
It was moved by Councilmember Mavity, seconded by Councilmember Ross, to adopt
Resolution No. 12-085 in Opposition to Proposed “Photo Identification Required for
Voting” Constitutional Amendment.
The motion passed 5-0 (Mayor Jacobs and Councilmember Santa absent).
8c. Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Amendment – First Reading.
Mr. Vaughan presented the staff report and proposed changes relating to the City’s
prohibition on feeding of wildlife, including consolidating the ordinances into one
chapter. He stated the list of prohibited animals has been expanded to include coyotes,
wild turkeys, and opossum, and the proposed changes address the method in which food
can be offered as well as the type of food allowed and prohibited.
Mr. Hoffman advised the current City Code is not clear about whether the raising of
honey bees is permitted and the City has received questions and complaints about
neighbors keeping bee hives. He indicated the proposed amendment clarifies that
beekeeping would not be allowed in the City.
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 3c) Page 7
Subject: City Council Meeting Minutes of June 18, 2012
Mr. Nicholas Slade, 2316 Westridge Lane, appeared before the City Council and urged
the City Council not to prohibit beekeeping. He stated he has kept bees in the past and
felt this was a solution looking for a problem. He indicated that bees exist domestically
and in the wild and domestic bees are relatively tame. He stated there are a lot of
misnomers about bees compared with wasps, noting that domestic bees are bred to be
calm and non-aggressive and can only sting once. He stated that an exception to the
ordinance will allow bee hives at Westwood Nature Center and bees travel up to six miles
so there will still be bees around wherever there are bee hives. He urged the City Council
not to prohibit the keeping of bees.
Mr. Mark Clifford, 2225 Gettysburg Avenue, appeared before the City Council and stated
that bees are beneficial to the community and can be managed in a way that is completely
safe. He indicated studies have found that removing beekeeping from a community
raises the aggressive nature of bees and felt that a one size fits all approach to eliminating
beekeeping was shortsighted. He agreed there were many misconceptions about bees and
urged the City Council to educate itself before changing the ordinance.
Mr. Gary Reuter, 1460 80th Street, Amery, Wisconsin, appeared before the City Council
and stated he works for the University of Minnesota Entomology Department, conducting
research on honeybees. He stated that most people are afraid of getting stung but most of
the time people are stung by yellow jackets and not by a honeybee. He indicated that
only 2-3% of people are allergic to bee stings and the normal bee sting reaction is itching
and some swelling. He explained that bees are always foraging for food and water and
there are things a beekeeper can do to keep bees on their property, including having water
available for the bees. He discussed the bee colony kept at Gibbs Farm on Cleveland and
Larpenter and stated they have never received complaints from people that bees were
bothering them. He stated bees provide several benefits to a community, including
pollination, and urged the City Council not to prohibit beekeeping entirely and felt that
reasonable restrictions could be put in place to eliminate potential problems.
Councilmember Ross stated there is a public safety component that the City Council is
responsible for which makes this a difficult issue to balance. She requested information
regarding how to prevent another species, which is more aggressive from moving in and
becoming aggressive in a bee colony. She also asked what other cities have done,
particularly where lot sizes are small.
Mr. Reuter explained that honeybees will not take over another colony. He stated a bee
colony contains a Queen and 30,000-40,000 worker bees and the workers will prevent
other bees from coming in; if a swarm attempts to take over, the Queen will be killed and
a new Queen will be introduced to take over the hive. He stated that if he had a neighbor
who was seriously allergic to bees, he would consider not keeping bees and added there
are things people can do to keep bees away from neighboring properties, e.g., putting up
a tall hedge or five foot fence that acts as a fly barrier. He indicated this requirement
could be added to the ordinance. He added that people have an innate fear of bees and
some cities have required beekeepers to prove some knowledge of beekeeping, e.g.,
taking a class.
Mr. Clifford stated that bees inherently know what to do and they know what their role is
in the hive. He stressed the challenges faced by bees in this country because of pesticides
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 3c) Page 8
Subject: City Council Meeting Minutes of June 18, 2012
and other issues, which has resulted in a dramatic decline in the bee population from
colony collapse disorder. He stated the lack of diversity in the bee population is another
contributing factor and is one of the reasons citizen beekeepers are needed.
Councilmember Mavity expressed appreciation to the speakers for providing education
on beekeeping. She felt that the proposed prohibition on beekeeping could be fine-tuned
to provide a tool for managing bees in the City. She indicated the City is in the process
of establishing an environment/sustainability task force and this seems in concert with the
City’s efforts to promote more community gardens and sustainable living. She stated she
did not want to take any action today that would stop this discussion and suggested that
staff be directed to further review this prior to the second reading, including providing a
comparison of other communities with respect to beekeeping.
Councilmember Spano agreed with Councilmember Mavity that further discussion
should take place before the second reading.
Mr. Hoffman explained the Inspections Department has responded to a number of animal
complaints in the community, including bees. He stated the question arises whether the
keeping of bees is a hazard and if it is determined to be a hazard, it becomes a nuisance.
He indicated that staff reviewed other ordinances, which require a 25’ setback, a six foot
fence, or ¾ of an acre to keep bees. He agreed that staff would further review the
regulations and provide options for Council review.
It was moved by Councilmember Mavity, seconded by Councilmember Ross, to approve
First Reading of Ordinance Relating to the Keeping and Feeding of Wild Animals,
Amending Sections 4-41 to 4-45 and Section 12-34 of the St. Louis Park City Code, as
amended to remove Sec. 4-42(8) pending further discussion by the City Council, and to
set Second Reading for July 16, 2012.
Mayor Pro Tem Sanger stated she did not want this issue to result in the community
having neighbor disputes about keeping bees. She indicated that bees should be required
to be kept in a confined space where neighbors are not subjected to potential health
hazards.
Councilmember Ross agreed and stated she felt Council should further study the issue
before making any changes to the ordinance.
Mayor Pro Tem Sanger noted that most of the ordinance amendments are intended to
tighten up the requirements about feeding of wildlife. She expressed Council’s
appreciation to staff for their efforts in this regard.
The motion passed 5-0 (Mayor Jacobs and Councilmember Santa absent).
8d. Miscellaneous Licensing and Nuisance Ordinance – First Reading.
Mr. Hoffman presented the staff report and stated the proposed amendments are intended
to provide clarity and effectiveness in enforcement of the City Code. He explained that
competency cards are required for contractors installing gas piping and the amendment
eliminates the requirement for a competency card for fuel burning equipment installers
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 3c) Page 9
Subject: City Council Meeting Minutes of June 18, 2012
such as installers of gas dryers or stoves. He stated that Section 8-372 does not currently
require a criminal background check before issuing a tobacco license and staff believes a
background check should be done for these establishments. He stated that smoking of
tobacco products inside tobacco sales shops is currently permitted and the Minnesota
Clean Indoor Air Act prohibits indoor smoking but allows smoking of tobacco for
sampling purposes within tobacco establishments. He explained this amendment would
eliminate the loophole to not allow sampling of tobacco within licensed tobacco
establishments. He stated an additional amendment relates to nuisance abatement and
clarifies the title of the position in charge of nuisance abatement and assessment to the
Director of Inspections.
It was moved by Councilmember Mavity, seconded by Councilmember Hallfin, to
approve First Reading of Ordinance Relating to Licensing and Inspections, Amending
Sections 8-116, 8-372, 8-374 and 12-35 of the St. Louis Park Code and to set Second
Reading for July 16, 2012.
The motion passed 5-0 (Mayor Jacobs and Councilmember Santa absent).
9. Communications
Councilmember Mavity congratulated everyone involved with making Parktacular a
success, particularly Joan Fenton and her staff.
Mayor Pro Tem Sanger congratulated the leadership of the St. Louis Park Community
Foundation on their successful beer tasting fundraiser.
Councilmember Hallfin stated the West End venue for Friday night’s Boogie
Wonderland concert was great. He congratulated the St. Louis Park Rail Cats on winning
the Gene Berg wood bat tournament.
10. Adjournment
The meeting adjourned at 9:12 p.m.
______________________________________ ______________________________________
Nancy Stroth, City Clerk Susan Sanger, Mayor Pro Tem
Meeting Date: July 16, 2012
City Council Agenda Item #: 4a
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Designating Polling Places and Appointing Election Judges for 2012 Elections
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to Adopt Resolution designating 2012 polling places and appointing election judges for
the August 14, 2012 State Primary Election and the November 6, 2012 State General Election.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
None
BACKGROUND:
MN Statute 204B.21, Subd. 2 and City Charter Section 4.05 provides that election judges for
precincts shall be appointed by the governing body of the municipality and that the appointments
be made at least 25 days before the election at which the election judges will serve. Election
judges are assigned to precincts based on availability, party balance, and the number required for
each location. Election judges are also allowed to serve without affiliation to a major political
party, but are not allowed to perform certain tasks at the precinct. The resolution contains the
names of those who have indicated a willingness and ability to serve as an election judge and
appointment by the Council will allow judges to serve at the 2012 Elections.
St. Louis Park will again be working with the city’s two high schools to recruit student election
judges for the November Presidential Election. Another resolution will be presented to Council
in September to appoint additional election judges and student judges for the General Election.
In Hennepin County, each city is responsible for training their election judges. To accommodate
all the election judges this year, a total of eight 2½ hour paid training sessions are scheduled for
regular and student judges, in addition to training sessions for Chair and Co-Chair Judges,
healthcare voting absentee judges, and absentee ballot board judges.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
Election expenses for judges are included in the adopted 2012 budget. Election judge hourly pay
is as follows: $8.42 regular judges, $9.44 Co-Chair judges; $9.95 Chair judges.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged community through recruitment
and training of community members to serve as Election Judges.
Attachments: Resolution
Prepared by: Nancy Stroth, City Clerk
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4a) Page 2
Subject: Designating Polling Places and Appointing Election Judges for 2012 Elections
RESOLUTION NO. 12 -_______
RESOLUTION DESIGNATING POLLING PLACES AND
APPOINTING ELECTION JUDGES FOR THE
PRIMARY AND GENERAL ELECTION OF 2012
WHEREAS, the State Primary and General Election will be held on August 14, 2012
and November 6, 2012 at the following precinct polling locations:
Ward 1 Precinct 1 – Beth El Synagogue, 5224 26th St W
Ward 1 Precinct 2 – Peter Hobart Elementary School, 6500 W. 26th St
Ward 1 Precinct 3 – St. Louis Park City Hall, 5005 Minnetonka Blvd
Ward 1 Precinct 4 – Central Community Center, 6300 Walker St
Ward 2 Precinct 5 – Union Congregational Church, 3700 Alabama Ave S
Ward 2 Precinct 6 – St. Louis Park Recreation Center, 3700 Monterey Dr
Ward 2 Precinct 7 – Susan Lindgren Elementary School, 4801 W 41st St
Ward 2 Precinct 8 – Aldersgate United Methodist Church, 3801 Wooddale Ave S
Ward 3 Precinct 9 – Prince of Peace Lutheran Church, 8115 State Hwy No 7
Ward 3 Precinct 10 – Lenox Community Center, 6715 Minnetonka Blvd
Ward 3 Precinct 11 – St. Louis Park Senior High School, 6425 W. 33rd St
Ward 3 Precinct 12 – Aquila Elementary School, 8500 W. 31st St
Ward 4 Precinct 13 – Westwood Lutheran Church, 9001 Cedar Lake Road
Ward 4 Precinct 14 – Park Assembly Church, 1615 Texas Ave S
Ward 4 Precinct 15 – Peace Presbyterian Church, 7624 Cedar Lake Road
Ward 4 Precinct 16 – Sabes Jewish Community Center, 4330 Cedar Lake Rd
WHEREAS, as authorized by MN Statute 204B.21, Subd. 2, election judges for
precincts shall be appointed by the governing body of the municipality no later than 25 days
before each election; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the St. Louis Park City Council that the
following individuals named on Exhibit A and on file in the office of the City Clerk are hereby
appointed to serve as election judges, absentee ballot board judges, or alternate judges for the
2012 Primary and General Election; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the St. Louis Park City Council also appoints other
individuals and all members appointed to the Hennepin County Absentee Ballot Board as
authorized under Minn. Stat. 204B.21, subd. 2 under direction of the Election Manager to serve
as members of the St. Louis Park Absentee Ballot Board; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is with this, authorized to make any
substitutions or additions as deemed necessary.
Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council July 16 , 2012
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4a) Page 3
Subject: Designating Polling Places and Appointing Election Judges for 2012 Elections
Resolution No. 12 - ___ Exhibit A
Appointed 2012 Election Judges
WARD 1
1-1, Beth El Synagogue
Jami LaPray, Chair
Nanette Malcomson, Co-Chair
Mary Enz
Nan Blomquist
JoAnn Cox
Lynne Fischer
Elizabeth Jensen
Henry Solmer
Nancy Wood
1-2, Peter Hobart Elementary School
Eunice Slager, Chair
Margaret Marek, Co-Chair
Donald Becker
Janice Bloom
Rose Bratland
Dianne Casey
Constance Nerheim
Julie Pelowitz
Elianna Thorne
1-3, City Hall
Barbara Ruhl, Chair
Mary Maynard, Co-Chair
Barbara Barbo
Carol Kohler
Barb Osfar
Esther Smith
Lucille Thornsjo
1-4, Central Community Center
Mary Lou Christensen, Chair
Ross Plovnick, Co-Chair
Mary Kaye Conery
Jorge Garcia
Elaine Savick
Kris Stapleton
Frank Wells
WARD 2
2-5, Union Congregational Church
Kay Drache, Chair
Amy Bagne, Co-Chair
Ronald Adams
Jill Doescher
J. Hamilton Kurtz
Joy Showalter
Barbara Wilensky
2-6, St. Louis Park Rec Center
David Larson, Chair
Debra Wuebker, Co-Chair
Judith Adams
Thomas Babcock
Sheila Hanley
Kelly Jordan
Brendalee Litman
Karen Secor
2-7, Susan Lindgren Elementary School
Jon Bloom, Chair
Loren Botner, Co-Chair
Don Carlson
Angie Eilers
Diane Garetz
Geoffrey Selby
Katherine Thiessen
Ernest Tursich
2-8, Aldersgate United Methodist Church
Deb Bjorgaard, Chair
Julie Anne Manuel, Co-Chair
Marquerite Krause
Shammi Lochan
Heather Mainella
Nathan Proano
WARD 3
3-9, Prince of Peace Lutheran Church
William Tape, Chair
Kimball Justesen, Co-Chair
Betty Deane
John Iacono
Mary Jo Lochan
Laura Olevitch
3-10, Lenox Community Center
Stephen Koepcke, Chair
Bill Allen, Co-Chair
Joan Lee
Robin Kirscher
William Robinson
Judy Shapiro
Richard Steege
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4a) Page 4
Subject: Designating Polling Places and Appointing Election Judges for 2012 Elections
3-11, St. Louis Park Senior High School
Judith Serrell, Chair
Janet Benson, Co-Chair
Jacqueline Buda
Susanne Mattison
Terri Murphy
Lois Nalezny
Francis Schmit
3-12, Aquila Elementary School
Ken Huiras, Chair
Carolyn Turk, Co-Chair
Shirley Karsten
Anne Kertes
Kevin Marsh
John Schaefer
Sherm Stanchfield
WARD 4
4-13, Westwood Lutheran Church
Angela Fischels, Chair
Kathy Metzker, Co-Chair
Beverly Fricke
Daniel Korsman
Josie Petermeier
Paul Tanick
Mary Wheeler
4-14, Park Assembly Church
Mary Hendrix, Chair
Peter Gardner, Co-Chair
Shirley Bierma
Carla Kulas
Martin Lee
Paula Maisel
Ava Marske
Brian Nerheim
Pat Palm
Carol Schaub
Richard Struxness
4-15, Peace Presbyterian Church
Mary Wickersham, Chair
Brenda Martens, Co-Chair
Todd Kalk
Patricia Kremer
Elizabeth Rung
Annette St. Lawrence
4-16, Sabes Jewish Community Center
Rick Marsden, Chair
David Brehmer, Co-Chair
Lawrence Carlson
Helen Desens
Jeffrey` Gershone
Maureen Gormley
John White
Julie Weaver
Absentee Ballot Board Judges
Micki Danovsky
Carol Evers
Shirley Huiras
Jo Jacobs
Jodie Meckle
Darla Monson
Deb Montilino
Kathy Stehly
Alice Tangney
Lori Vail
Alternate Election Judges
Ira Bagloo
Gary Berkovitz
Richard Dworsky
Olga Hanlon
Marsia Herman
Joan Hughes
Kirsten Kurtz
Gwyneth Leder
Meredythe McCarthy
MaryJo Scully
Irene Thoennes
Roberta Wilensky
Meeting Date: July 16, 2012
Agenda Item #: 4b
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Elected Official Use of City Fitness Facility
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to Adopt Resolution allowing Mayor and Councilmembers to use the City fitness facility
at Fire Station 1 during their term in office.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Does Council wish to approve use of City fitness facility and equipment by Mayor and
Councilmembers?
BACKGROUND:
The newly constructed Fire Station 1 has a fitness facility. The equipment in the fitness area was
originally obtained with a grant. In the building of the new station, a small fitness/wellness area
was designed to be used by staff to encourage health, fitness and wellness. The City Manager
has approved a written policy which makes this equipment and facility available to specific
employees that includes benefit earning staff, paid-on-call firefighters, and police cadets in an
effort to promote physical fitness and wellness. Limits were placed on use of this facility and
equipment due to training requirements, safety concerns, facility access/security, liability, space
and limited amount of equipment.
At a recent study session, several Councilmembers requested that elected officials be added to
those who are eligible to use the facility and equipment.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
Attachments: Resolution and Policy (Appendix A)
Prepared by: Ali Fosse, HR Coordinator
Reviewed by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4b) Page 2
Subject: Elected Official Use of City Fitness Facility
RESOLUTION NO. 12-____
RESOLUTION OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA,
ALLOWING MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBER USE OF CITY FITNESS FACILITY
WHEREAS, a fitness facility has been included at the newly constructed Fire Station 1;
and
WHEREAS, the City encourages and promotes wellness and physical fitness; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager has approved a policy that allows use of the facility by
benefit earning staff, paid-on-call firefighters, and police cadets;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of St. Louis
Park, Minnesota, by this Resolution and public record, approves use of the City fitness facility by
the Mayor and Councilmembers during their terms is approved as part of City policy (attached as
Appendix A).
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council July 16, 2012
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4b) Page 3
Subject: Elected Official Use of City Fitness Facility
APPENDIX A
City Fitness Facility Use Policy – Fire Station 1
Purpose: The City has provided exercise equipment for employee use in Fire Station 1.
The use of this equipment is a privilege that can be revoked at any time for a
violation of this policy. The facility can be closed and all rights of use revoked at
any time and for any reason by the City Manager. The facility and equipment
therein is being made available for use by employees while they are off-duty at
their own risk to assist personal pursuits of wellness and physical fitness.
Who: Open to all regular benefit earning full- and part-time employees and paid-on-call
firefighters, as determined by the City Manager, and Mayor and Councilmembers
in accordance with Resolution 12-xx.
1. Benefit-earning staff, paid-on-call firefighters, police cadets and Mayor and Council
(Resolution 12-xx) will become eligible for use of the facility and equipment after a
waiver of liability (attached) is signed and placed on file with Human Resources. Key
fob access will be authorized for eligible individuals with signed waivers on file.
2. The facility is available for use by authorized users 24 hours a day, 365 days per year.
The City’s Fire Chief or designee has authority to administer the facility, oversee its use,
enforce rules, and resolve disputes over use.
3. No authorized user may allow guests into the facility. Access is strictly limited to
persons whose use is authorized by Human Resources.
4. No user may monopolize a particular piece of equipment for an unreasonable length of
time or reserve equipment for future use.
5. All disputes over the use of the facility or equipment must be promptly directed to the
Fire Chief.
6. All users must report any observed equipment maintenance or malfunction problems
promptly to the Fire Chief or designee.
7. When on the premises of the facility or while using equipment, all users must abide by
the policies contained in the City’s Personnel Manual.
8. The use of personal audio devices is allowed only with headphones so as not to be
audible to other users. Any televisions must be kept to a reasonable volume.
9. Users must clean equipment promptly after use with cleaner provided.
10. Users must at all times, while in the workout area of the facility, wear proper attire,
including athletic shoes and shirt. No clothing with offensive language or pictures will
be allowed in the workout facility.
11. Additional exercise equipment is located at Fire Station 2. The Fire Chief has full and
complete authority in determining rules and conditions of use for that facility for
members of the Fire Department.
Policy Approved By:
________________________________________ _______________
Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Date
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4b) Page 4
Subject: Elected Official Use of City Fitness Facility
CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK
WORKOUT FACILITY WAIVER OF LIABILITY
I hereby seek authorization from the City of St. Louis Park to use the Workout Facility located in
St. Louis Park Fire Station 1. As a condition of my use of this facility and all of the equipment
located therein, I hereby enter into the following Agreement with the City of St. Louis Park.
1. I agree for myself, my heirs, executors, administrators, personal representatives and
assigns that in consideration of being allowed use of the Workout Facility to hereby
release, hold harmless and discharge the City of St. Louis Park, its officers, officials,
agents and employees (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “City of St. Louis Park”)
of and from all claims, demands, causes of action and legal liability, whether the same be
known or unknown, anticipated or unanticipated, with respect to any and all injury,
disability, death or loss or damage to person or property sustained by me in connection
with or arising out of my use of the Workout Facility or the equipment, machines,
devices located therein due to the City of St. Louis Park’s actual or implied negligence;
except that which is the result of gross negligence or wanton misconduct.
2. I agree that my use of the Workout Facility is completely voluntary for my own personal
benefit and that the City of St. Louis Park has not ordered or required my use of this
facility and that my use or failure to use this facility will have no impact on my
relationship or employment with the City of St. Louis Park.
3. I agree and understand that the City of St. Louis Park will not provide any supervision
over the equipment located within the Workout Facility or the activities conducted
therein.
4. I agree that at all times while using the Workout Facility or adjoining showers and locker
rooms that I will be considered for all intents and purposes to be on my own personal
time and accordingly, in the case of injury, that I shall have no compensable Worker’s
Compensation claim.
5. I agree and understand that the City of St. Louis Park makes no implied or express
representations or warranties as to the condition of the equipment, machines, devices
located within the Workout Facility or the fitness of equipment, machines, devices for
use as exercise equipment and that I knowingly and voluntarily assume all risks of
personal injury or death or property damage or loss in connection with or arising out of
my use of this facility and the equipment located therein.
6. I hereby represent to the City of St. Louis Park that I have received orientation or
instructions on the proper use of the equipment, machines, and devices in a manner that
does not present a danger to myself or other persons.
7. I hereby represent that I have read the City’s Exercise Equipment Use Policy and agree to
abide by all rules, regulations and orders applicable to my use of the facility and the
equipment, machines and devices located therein. I agree and understand that a violation
of these rules, regulations or orders may result in the revocation of my privilege to use
this facility.
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4b) Page 5
Subject: Elected Official Use of City Fitness Facility
8. I agree to report all equipment that I believe is malfunctioning or in need of repair to the
Fire Chief or designee.
9. I hereby represent that I am in good physical condition and that my use of the Workout
Facility and the equipment located therein will not pose a danger to my health or safety. I
acknowledge that the City of St. Louis Park recommends and encourages all persons
embarking upon fitness or exercise program to first consult with their physician and abide
by any limitations set by their physician.
10. I agree and understand that the City of St. Louis Park Fire Chief has the authority to close
this Facility and revoke all use privileges at any time and for any reason.
11. I agree that except in the event of the City of St. Louis Park’ gross negligence or wanton
misconduct, that I shall not bring any claims, demands, legal actions or causes of action
against the City of St. Louis Park or any person who provided equipment located within
the Workout Facility for any economic or non-economic losses due to bodily injury,
death, property damage sustained by me in relation to the Workout Facility, the
equipment located therein, or the adjacent showers and locker rooms, it being my express
intent and purposed to bind myself, my heirs, executors, administrator and assigns
hereby.
12. The City of St. Louis Park is not waiving any immunities to which it may be entitled
under state law.
I have read this release of liability, waiver and assumption of risk agreement, fully understand its
terms, understand that I have given up substantial rights by signing it, and sign it freely and
voluntarily without any inducement.
Signed: ________________________________
Print Name:_____________________________
Dated:_________________________________
**FORWARD THIS FORM TO HUMAN RESOURCES WHEN SIGNED**
1. Human Resources will notify Fire Dept of your eligibility
2. Fire Dept will contact you to arrange training and issue your key fob.
Meeting Date: July 16, 2012
Agenda Item: 4c
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Special Meeting Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Special Session Other:
TITLE:
Environment/Sustainability Task Force Appointments
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to appoint the following people to the time limited Environment/Sustainability Task
Force as determined by the City Council at its June 25 study session: Kandi Arries, Timothy
Brausen, Judy Chucker, Andrew Emanuele, Lisa Genis, Terry Gips, Tom Hillstrom, Ellen
Lipschultz, Susan Melbye, Rick Person, Amy Peterson, Eric Schultz, Brian Shekleton, Kelly
Spors, and Paul Zeigle.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
None at this time.
BACKGROUND:
On March 26, 2012, the City Council discussed public involvement in the City’s environmental
policies and initiatives. The discussion centered on “what is missing” in the environmental area?
This issue was a topic of discussion going back to 2007 and 2008 as part of the Strategic
Direction adopted related to the environment. Specifically, the City Council identified the need
to investigate “the need and purpose of an energy and environmental commission”.
Below is information regarding past Council discussions on this topic:
• February 25, 2008 – Study Session: Discussed Strategic Direction related to the
environment and the need for an energy/environmental commission.
• September 13, 2010 – Study Session: Environmental Activities Update.
• November 8, 2010 – Study Session: Process for Community Input on Environment.
• March 26, 2012 – Study Session: Environmental Input Discussion. Review of outline for
a time limited task force to define the approach for public input into the City’s
environmental/sustainability policies and initiatives.
• April 23, 2012 – Study Session: Environmental Input Task Force discussion and review of
application process, information and timelines.
• May 29, 2012 – Report to Council regarding the progress with the application process and
next steps set for June 11. Due to lower number of applications at the time of writing the
report, Council was informed the application deadline was extended to June 4.
• June 11, 2012 – Study Session: it was the consensus of the City Council to review and
rank the 25 applications received for the Environment/Sustainability Task Force.
• June 25, 2012 – Study Session: it was the consensus of the City Council to direct staff to
appoint the top 15 applicants to the Task Force.
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4c) Page 2
Subject: Environment/Sustainability Taskforce Appointments
Next steps: Staff has contacted all who applied and thanked them for their support and interest.
The task force members will be contacted to set up the initial meeting to review the scope of
their work and set up future meeting schedule to complete this by year end. As set by Council,
the purpose of the Environment/Sustainability Taskforce is to assist the City Council by
recommending the approach the City should use to allow for public input into the City’s
environmental and sustainability policies, programs and initiatives. The task force would meet
for a limited duration to make recommendation(s) to the City Council no later than December 31,
2012. Once recommendations are formulated and presented, the work of the task force will be
completed.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
None at this time.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
“St. Louis Park is committed to being a leader in environmental stewardship. We will increase
environmental consciousness and responsibility in all areas of City business.
Attachments: Environment/Sustainability Task Force Application Info – 4/30/12
Prepared by: Ray French, Administrative Services Intern
Reviewed by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4c) Page 3
Subject: Environment/Sustainability Taskforce Appointments
Environment/Sustainability Task Force
4/30/12
The St. Louis Park City Council is accepting applications from residents to serve on an
Environment/Sustainability Task Force to make recommendations on the approach the City
should use to allow for public input into the City’s environmental/sustainability policies,
programs and initiatives. The task force would be made up of 8 – 15 residents to volunteer their
time and represent various geographic areas of the City. Applicants for the task force will be
asked to provide information on their education, experience, activities, interests and work in the
area of the environment/sustainability. Applicants will also be asked to describe 3 – 5 main
concerns/ideas/activities related to the environment/sustainability that are of most interest to
them.
Council will review applications and appoint residents to this task force on June 11, 2012 (or
other date as determined). Meetings are expected to be scheduled starting in June. The meeting
schedule will be determined by staff and task force members. This task force will serve in a
voluntary capacity with no compensation and for a limited duration. Recommendations from
the task force are to be developed no later than December 31, 2012. Once the recommendations
are completed, the work of the task force will end.
Applications will be open starting April 30 through June 4, 2012 and can be completed on line at
www.stlouispark.org
Questions on this should be directed to Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director at
952.924.2519 or ndeno@stlouispark.org
Scope of the Volunteer Environment/Sustainability Task Force is as follows:
Purpose: To assist the City Council by recommending the approach the City should use to allow
for public input into the City’s environmental/sustainability policies, programs and initiatives.
The task force would meet for a limited duration and make recommendation(s) to the City
Council no later than December 31, 2012.
Task force would meet and undertake the following activities:
1. Review background and current information on environmental and sustainability
activities, programs, staffing and overall scope of work in all departments of the city
and regulatory agencies.
2. Brainstorm ideas on possibilities and look into “what’s missing” regarding public input
into sustainability/environmental policies, programs and initiatives of the City.
3. Review other opportunities that could offer resident interaction about environmental
issues (including and not limited to: on line forums, create a “friends of the
environment”, add to existing City commission or create a new commission, connect
residents through on line methods, etc.).
4. Sift through ideas and begin to prioritize the ideas, and develop options/recommendations.
5. Formalize recommendation to the City Council.
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4c) Page 4
Subject: Environment/Sustainability Taskforce Appointments
Guiding Principles:
• The task force will meet as needed to go through the process stated above and develop
recommendation(s) for City Council no later than December 2012.
• The task force will end after it has finalized/ presented its recommendations.
• City Council has the final decision on what the next steps should be and may select
all, some or none of the task force recommendations.
• If a new “group” or commission is formed, it will be open to residents from across the
city who will apply (if task force members want to be on the new “group” or
commission, they will receive the same consideration as the rest of the applicants).
How does this begin/Timeline?
• Applications from residents to serve on task force open April 30 – June 4.
• Council receives applications on June 11, 2012.
• Council selects members.
• Start meetings in June, and process completed no later than December 2012.
• Bridget Gothberg, Organizational Development Coordinator with the City, will
facilitate the task force.
• Other City staff will be present to provide information as needed.
• Task Force membership will have a size limitation between 8 – 15 people maximum.
Meeting Date: July 16, 2012
Agenda Item #: 4d
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Miscellaneous Licensing and Nuisance Ordinance – 2nd Reading
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to Approve Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance approving Changes to Chapter 8
regarding Businesses and Licenses and Chapter 12 for Nuisance Abatement and Assessment.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Does the Council wish to adopt this ordinance amending City Code regarding gas piping and fuel
burning equipment, tobacco licensing, and nuisance abatement and assessment section.
BACKGROUND:
The first reading of amending City Code Chapter 8 regarding Business Licensing and Chapter 12
Nuisance Abatement and Assessment occurred June 18, 2012. The Council approved the first
reading of the ordinance with a 6 – 0 vote (Mayor Jacobs absent).
Regular review of the City Code is helpful to keep regulations current and adapt to changing
conditions. This group of proposed amendments is intended to provide increased clarity and
effectiveness in application of the Code.
DISCUSSION:
A summary of the propose amendments are as follows:
• Section 8-116 Gas Piping and Fuel Burning Equipment - Eliminate the competency card
requirement for fuel burning equipment installers.
• Section 8-372 Tobacco License Required – Establish a criminal background check for the
applicant of a tobacco license. The applicant will need to provide a readable copy of a
government issued picture identification with current address; and a background check to
determine if they have ever been convicted of any felony, gross misdemeanor or
misdemeanor; and authorize the city to complete a background check.
• Section 8-374 Tobacco Prohibited Sales - Title of the section will be changed from
Prohibited Sales to Regulations Adopted and adding item (b) to prohibit tobacco
sampling inside licensed tobacco establishments.
• Section 12-35 Nuisance Abatement and Assessment - The term “health official” is
proposed to be removed and replaced with Director of Inspections throughout the section.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
No significant expenditure of city resources or increase in fee for services is expected as a result
of the proposed ordinance amendments.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
Attachment: Ordinance
Summary Ordinance
Prepared by: Brian Hoffman, Director of Inspections
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4d) Page 2
Subject: Miscellaneous Licensing and Nuisance Ordinance – 2nd Reading
ORDINANCE NO. ____-12
CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO LICENSING AND INSPECTIONS, AMENDING
SECTIONS 8-116, 8-372, 8-374 AND 12-35 OF THE ST. LOUIS PARK CODE
THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK DOES ORDAIN:
SECTION 1. Section 8-116 of the City Code is hereby amended as follows:
Sec. 8-116. Gas piping and fuel burning equipment.
Any person installing, repairing or altering gas piping or fuel burning equipment
for which a mechanical contractor's license with a gas piping and fuel burning equipment
endorsement is required, must have a valid city certificate of competency for gas piping
and fuel burning equipment issued to such person. The person must carry the certificate of
competency when performing any work, and must present the certificate of competency
upon request to any city representative. This requirement is in addition to any or all
other licensing requirements and does not eliminate the need for a mechanical
contractor's license.
SECTION 2. Section 8-372 of the City Code is hereby amended as follows:
Sec. 8-372. License required.
(a) No person shall sell or offer to sell any tobacco, tobacco product or tobacco
related device without first having obtained a license to do so from the city.
(b) No license shall be issued for the sale of tobacco, tobacco products or tobacco
related devices at any place other than the applicant's place of business. No license shall be
issued for a moveable place of business; nor shall any single license be issued for the sale of
tobacco, tobacco products or tobacco related devices at more than one place of business.
(c) Complete applications shall be reviewed by the city for verification and
investigation of the facts set forth in the application, including a criminal background
investigation of the applicant. The city may order and conduct such additional investigation as
deemed necessary.
(d) The city shall make the determination whether to approve or deny the license.
Any denial shall be communicated to the applicant in writing, specifying the reasons for denial.
The applicant may appeal the denial in accordance with the procedure specified in section 8-36.
(e) Complete applications for issuance of annual licenses shall be submitted to the
city at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the license. The determination regarding
approval or denial of the license renewal shall be communicated to the applicant in writing,
specifying the reasons if the application is denied. The applicant may appeal the denial in
accordance with the procedure specified in section 8-36.
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4d) Page 3
Subject: Miscellaneous Licensing and Nuisance Ordinance – 2nd Reading
SECTION 3. Section 8-374 of the City Code is hereby amended as follows:
Sec. 8-374. Prohibited sales Regulations Adopted.
(a) It shall be a violation of this subdivision for any person to sell or offer to sell any
tobacco, tobacco product or tobacco related device:
(1) To any person under the age of 18 years.
(2) By means of any type of vending machine.
(3) By means of self-service merchandising whereby the customer does not need to
make a verbal or written request to an employee of the licensed premises in order
to receive the tobacco, tobacco related product or tobacco related device. All
tobacco related products shall be stored behind a counter, or other area, not
visible or accessible to customers.
(4) Containing opium, morphine, jimson weed, bella donna, strychnos, cocaine,
marijuana or other type of deleterious, hallucinogenic or toxic or controlled
substance, except nicotine, and not naturally found in tobacco or tobacco
products.
(5) By any other means or to any other person prohibited by federal, state or other
local laws, ordinances or other regulations.
(b) Tobacco sampling within an establishment selling any tobacco, tobacco product or
tobacco related devices is prohibited.
SECTION 4. Section 12-35 of the City Code is hereby amended as follows:
Sec. 12-35. Nuisance abatement and assessment.
(a) Purpose of section. The purpose of this section is to provide the city with the authority,
pursuant to M.S.A. § 429.101, as may be amended from time to time, to remove or eliminate
public health or safety hazards from private property and to provide for the collection of unpaid
special charges for all or any part of the costs incurred by the city to remove or eliminate the
hazards.
(b) Notice of need to abate nuisance. Whenever the existence of any nuisance defined in this
article, constituting a public health or safety hazard, within any lots or parcels of real estate
situated within the city, shall come to the attention of the health official Director of Inspections,
the official the Director shall cause an investigation of the reported nuisance. After the
investigation, the health official Director of Inspections shall determine whether a nuisance
exists. Upon finding a nuisance, the health official Director of Inspections shall prepare a written
notice and mail the notice to the owner of the property. The term "owner" shall be defined as the
person listed as owner according to the current records of the county auditor. Such notice shall
contain the name of the owner, his address (if known), the address of the property containing the
nuisance and a description of the nuisance which must be abated at the owner's expense, and the
time frame within which the nuisance must be abated as determined in the sole discretion of the
health official. In determining the time within which owner must abate the nuisance, the health
official Director of Inspections shall consider, among other factors, the following:
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4d) Page 4
Subject: Miscellaneous Licensing and Nuisance Ordinance – 2nd Reading
(1) The severity of the threat to public health and safety;
(2) The size or magnitude of the nuisance; and
(3) The number of persons affected by the nuisance.
The notice shall further state if owner fails to abate the nuisance within the time provided in such
notice, the city may enter onto the owner's property for purpose of abating the nuisance.
Noncompliance with the required action will result in city action to abate the nuisance the cost of
which will subsequently be assessed as a lien against the owner's property. If the owner's address
is not known, service of the notice may be made upon a tenant, lessee or owner's agent and shall
also be posted upon the property. Where no owner or owner's agent can be found, the city clerk
shall cause the notice to be published once in the official city newspaper within ten days of
issuance of the notice. If publication is required, the city shall allow an additional ten days from
the date of publication for owner to comply with the notice of violation and abatement.
(c) Time to respond. The owner shall abate the nuisance, at the owner's expense, within the
period of time contained within the notice. In the instance of publication of the notice, the owner
shall have ten days following the date of publication of the notice, plus the amount of time
provided in the notice to abate the nuisance. The health official Director of Inspections shall
cause an inspection of the property containing the nuisance to be made the day after the last day
for abatement as stated in the notice or within such other time as may be reasonable and
practical.
(d) Appeal. The owner shall have a right to appeal the notice as served by presenting the
appeal to the city manager within 48 hours of service of the notice or within two days of its
publication, excluding weekends and legal holidays. Within 72 hours of presentation of the
appeal, the city manager shall meet with the owner and the official to hear the matter. The city
manager shall consider the issues and make a final decision within 48 hours following the
meeting. The owner shall be served by mail of the manager's decision. The owner may appeal the
city manager's decision to the city council. Within ten days of receipt of the mailed decision of
the city manager, the owner shall make a request, in writing, to the city manager to be placed on
the agenda at the next regularly scheduled city council meeting, to consider the owner's appeal of
the city manager's decision. The city council shall consider the appeal and make a final decision.
A final decision by the city council is not appealable.
(e) Enforcement/abatement. If the owner of the property does not respond to the served,
posted or published notice itemizing the nuisance and ordering its abatement, within the given
time as specified in such notice, the official Director may order the nuisance condition to be
abated by either the city or contracted employees. The cost of abating the nuisance shall be
compiled and a resolution prepared containing the name of the owner, the address and legal
description of the property containing the nuisance, the costs of abating the nuisance, and a
recommendation to assess the property, as a special assessment, for the costs. The assessment
proceedings shall be conducted as outlined in M.S.A. § 429.101. Upon its passage, the resolution
shall be submitted to the county auditor by November 10 of that year for assessment of the costs
as a lien against the property with the real estate taxes. The lien may be collected in a single
annual installment, or spread over a period of up to ten equal annual installments, to be
determined at the sole discretion of the city council.
(f) Payment of assessment. Upon passage by the city council of the resolution of approval
for assessment of costs incurred by the city to abate such nuisance, the city clerk shall send a bill
for the assessment amount to the owner. The owner may then pay the bill in full prior to its
submission to the county auditor. If the owner fails to pay the assessment prior to its submission
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4d) Page 5
Subject: Miscellaneous Licensing and Nuisance Ordinance – 2nd Reading
to the county auditor, the city shall forward the assessment information to the county auditor to
create a lien against the owner's real estate as per M.S.A. § 429.101.
(g) Expenses allowed. Expenses to be included in the abatement and assessment procedure
may include the cost of the abatement and any removal, publication of notice or of any notice of
action of the city council, posting and service of notices, departmental costs and expenses
including legal fees, allowance for city employee time, overtime and expense of any equipment
used. Such costs shall be compiled and prepared for presentation to the city council by the
official.
SECTION 5. This Ordinance shall take effect fifteen days after its publication.
First Reading June 18, 2012
Second Reading July 16, 2012
Date of Publication July 26, 2012
Date Ordinance takes effect August 10, 2012
Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council July 16, 2012
City Manager Mayor
Attest: Approved as to Form and Execution:
City Clerk City Attorney
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4d) Page 6
Subject: Miscellaneous Licensing and Nuisance Ordinance – 2nd Reading
SUMMARY PUBLICATION
ORDINANCE NO. _____-12
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO LICENSING AND INSPECTIONS, AMENDING
SECTIONS 8-116, 8-372, 8-374 AND 12-35 OF THE ST. LOUIS PARK CODE
This ordinance states that Sections 8-116, 8-372, 8-374 and Section 12-35 of the City of St.
Louis Park Code of Ordinances shall be amended relative to:
• Section 8-116 Gas Piping and Fuel Burning Equipment - eliminating competency card
requirement for fuel burning equipment installers.
• Section 8-372 Tobacco Licensing - adding requirement of a criminal background check
for tobacco license applicants.
• Section 8-374 Tobacco Prohibited Sales – adding tobacco sampling inside licensed
tobacco establishments is prohibited.
• Section 12-35 Nuisance Abatement and Assessment – replacing the term “health official”
with Director of Inspections.
This ordinance shall take effect 15 days after publication.
Adopted by the City Council July 16 , 2012
Jeffrey W. Jacobs /s/
Mayor
A copy of the full text of this ordinance is available for inspection with the City Clerk.
Published in St. Louis Park Sailor: July 26, 2012
Meeting Date: July 16, 2012
Agenda Item #: 4e
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Ordinance Relating to the Keeping and Feeding of Wild Animals - 2nd Reading
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to Approve Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance to approve changes to Chapter 4 and
Chapter 12 of the City Code relating to the feeding of wildlife, and to approve ordinance
summary and authorize publication.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Does the City Council wish to approve the proposed ordinances relative to the feeding of wild
animals?
BACKGROUND:
First reading was presented to City Council at their June 18, 2012 regular meeting. Changes
discussed at that meeting have been incorporated into the Ordinance.
Chapter 4, Section 4-44 of the City’s Code covers the prohibition of feeding deer, raccoon and
Canada geese. Chapter 12, Section 12-34 (14) of the code covers the prohibition of feeding deer
and raccoon only, with language pertaining to types of prohibited and accepted feeding. The
proposed changes affect both sections of both chapters.
The proposed changes are as follows:
• Combine ordinances into one section. This will assist in clarity and enforcement.
Section 4-44 will be titled “Feeding of Wild Animals” versus “Deer and Raccoon”;
Section 12-34 (14) will refer to Section 4-44.
• Add coyotes, wild turkeys and opossum to the list of prohibited animals to feed,
Section 4-44 (a). Under the current ordinances/sections, the feeding of coyote, wild
turkey and opossum is allowed. Wild turkey, coyotes and potentially opossum, due to
easy, desirable and available food stock, are approaching/feeding on various properties
within St. Louis Park. The concentrated presence of these animals causes alarm and
creates habituation of these animals in residential yards and of people. It’s beneficial for
people and the animals for them to remain wild and afraid of humans. With the increased
numbers of wild turkey and coyotes present in St. Louis Park the addition of these two
animals to the feeding ban is necessary.
• Add specification of the method in which food can be offered, Section 4-44 (b). The
proposed change is to make the feeding of allowed animals, such as birds, ducks and
squirrels, acceptable but defines the method to feed them (a feeder/feeding apparatus that
has to be 5’ off the ground and screened, if necessary) to prevent undesirable (primarily
deer and wild turkey) animal feeding. Currently, there is no specified height limit and
various food items may be set anywhere which promotes high animal concentrations
causing concentrated fecal matter, attraction of undesirable animals to a site and, inability
to control the site through enforcement.
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4e) Page 2
Subject: Ordinance Relating to the Keeping and Feeding of Wild Animals - 2nd Reading
• Add specification for the type of food allowed and prohibited, Section 4-44 (b). The
proposed ordinance clearly defines what food material is acceptable and what food
material is not. The current ordinance references “edible liquids and material” which is
left to interpretation, which means any food material can be left out for any animal,
making enforcement challenging.
• Change effective enforcement of the feeding ban, Section 4-44 (d). Enforcement is
currently difficult since the manner in which the food is offered and specific food items
presented on site are not clearly defined. Under the current scenario any food item for
feeding desirable animals, such as birds, is acceptable. This situation creates an attraction
for deer, coyote, Canada geese, wild turkey and potentially opossum, to congregate at
these feeding sites.
CHANGES TO THE ORDINANCE:
At the first reading on June 18, 2012, Councilmembers requested staff remove Section 4-42 (8)
that prohibits beekeeping. This language has been removed. The City Attorney has reviewed and
approved the proposed ordinances changes.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
The proposed ordinance is not expected to increase costs to the City.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
This ordinance is consistent with our second strategic direction: “St. Louis Park is committed to
being a leader in environmental stewardship. We will increase environmental consciousness and
responsibility in all areas of city business”.
Attachments: Amended Ordinance
Ordinance Summary
Prepared by: Stacy Voelker, Administrative Secretary
Jim Vaughan, Environmental Coordinator
Reviewed by: Cindy Walsh, Director of Parks and Recreation
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4e) Page 3
Subject: Ordinance Relating to the Keeping and Feeding of Wild Animals - 2nd Reading
ORDINANCE NO. ____-12
CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE KEEPING AND FEEDING
OF WILD ANIMALS, AMENDING SECTIONS 4-41 TO 4-45
AND SECTION 12-34 OF THE ST. LOUIS PARK CITY CODE
THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK DOES ORDAIN:
SECTION 1. Sections 4-41 to 4-44 of the City Code are hereby amended as follows:
Sec. 4-41. Purpose of article.
The purpose of this article is to protect the public health from disease transmission, animal
bites and public nuisances arising from the keeping or escape of non-domesticated animals.
(Code 1976, § 11-314)
Sec. 4-42. Definitions.
The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this article, shall have the meanings
ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning:
Nondomesticated animal means any wild animal, reptile, or fowl, which is not naturally tame
or gentle, but is of a wild nature or disposition and which, because of its size, vicious nature or
other characteristics, would constitute a danger to human life or property.
Sec. 4-4342. Prohibited animals.
No person shall keep, maintain or harbor within the city the following animals:
(1) Animal or species prohibited by state or federal law.
(2) Any nondomesticated animal or species including, but not limited to, the following:a.
Any skunk, whether captured in the wild, domestically raised, descented or not
descented, vaccinated against rabies or not vaccinated against rabies.
b.(3) Any large cat of the family Felidae such as lions, tigers, jaguars, leopards, bobcats,
lynx, cougars and ocelots, except commonly accepted domesticated house cats.
c.(4) Any member of the family Canidae, such as wolves, fox, coyote, dingoes and jackals,
except domesticated dogs.
d.(5) Any hybrids such as wolf/dog and coyote/dog hybrids, but not including crossbred
domesticated animals.
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4e) Page 4
Subject: Ordinance Relating to the Keeping and Feeding of Wild Animals - 2nd Reading
e.(6) Venomous snakes of the Family Viperidae, such as adders, gabon vipers and pit vipers,
venomous snakes of the Family Elapidae, such as cobras, coral snakes and sea snakes,
three snakes of the Family Colubridae, the African twig snake (Thelotornis kirtland),
the rear fanged boomslang (Disphoiidus typus) and the Asian tiger snake (Rhabdophis
forinus); whether captured in the wild or domestically raised, defanged or not defanged,
devenomed or not devenomed.
f.(7) Any raccoon.
h.(8) Any other animal which is not listed explicitly in subsections (2)a.—(2)f.(1) to (8) of
this section, but which can be reasonably defined by the terms in section 4-42,
including bears, badgers, ostriches, llamas, alligators and crocodiles.is not naturally
tame or gentle, but is of a wild nature or disposition and which, because of its size,
vicious nature or other characteristics, would constitute a danger to human life or
property.
Sec. 4-44. Deer and raccoon.
Feeding deer, raccoon or Canada Goose is prohibited and declared a nuisance. persons
feeding deer, raccoon or Canada Goose shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
Sec. 4-43. Feeding of Wild Animals.
(a) No person shall feed deer, raccoons, wild turkeys, coyotes, opossum, Canada
goose or any prohibited animal identified in Section 4-42 within the boundaries of the city.
(b) No person shall place or permit to be placed on the ground, or within five feet (5’)
of the ground surface any grain, fodder, salt licks, fruit, vegetables, nuts, hay or other edible
materials (including feed for birds), which may reasonably be expect to result in deer, raccoon,
wild turkey, coyote or Canada goose feeding, unless such items are screened or protected in a
manner that prevents such feeding. The presence of living fruit trees and other live vegetation
shall not be considered feeding.
(c) The prohibitions in this section shall not apply to:
(1) Veterinarians, city animal control officers or county, state or federal game
officials who are in the course of their duties, have deer, raccoon, coyote,
wild turkey or Canada goose in custody or under their management;
(2) Persons authorized by the City of St. Louis Park to implement the Deer
Management Program approved by the City Council; and
(3) Any food placed upon the property for purposes of trapping or otherwise
taking deer where such trapping or taking is pursuant to a permit issued by
the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4e) Page 5
Subject: Ordinance Relating to the Keeping and Feeding of Wild Animals - 2nd Reading
(d) In addition to being a violation subject to the general penalty provisions of the
City Code, a violation of this section is declared to be a nuisance affecting public peace and
safety subject to the abatement and assessment provisions of Section 12-35 of the City Code.
SECTION 2. Section 4.45 of the City Code is renumbered to Section 4.44.
SECTION 3. Section 12-34(14) of the City Code is hereby amended to read in its
entirety as follows:
(14) No person shall feed deer or raccoons within the boundaries of the city. Feeding
shall include, but not be limited to, providing liquids or edible material to deer or
raccoons. Living food sources, such as fruit trees and other live vegetation, shall
not be considered as edible material. This section does not apply to veterinarians,
city employees, city animal wardens, or county, state or federal game officials
who in the course of their duties have deer or raccoons in their custody and/or
under their management.Feeding of deer, raccoons, wild turkeys, coyotes,
opossum, Canada goose or prohibited animals identified in Section 4-42.
SECTION 4. This ordinance shall take effect fifteen days after its publication.
First Reading June 18, 2012
Second Reading July 16, 2012
Date of Publication July 26, 2012
Date Ordinance takes effect August 10, 2012
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council July 16 , 2012
City Manager Mayor
Attest: Approved as to Form and Execution:
City Clerk City Attorney
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4e) Page 6
Subject: Ordinance Relating to the Keeping and Feeding of Wild Animals - 2nd Reading
SUMMARY
ORDINANCE NO. ____-12
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE KEEPING AND FEEDING OF WILD
ANIMALS, AMENDING SECTIONS 4-41 TO 4-45 AND SECTION 12-34
OF THE ST. LOUIS PARK CITY CODE
This ordinance clarifies wild animals and specifies prohibited wild animal keeping and feeding
practices.
This ordinance shall take effect not less than 15 days after publication.
Adopted by the City Council July 16, 2012
Jeffrey W. Jacobs /s/
Mayor
A copy of the full text of this ordinance is available for inspection with the City Clerk.
Published in St. Louis Park Sailor: July 26, 2012
Meeting Date: July 16, 2012
Agenda Item #: 4f
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Acceptance of Monetary Donation in Memory of Jim Lanenberg and Jane Grimsrud
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to Adopt Resolution approving acceptance of monetary donations from friends at
Westwood Hills Nature Center in memory of Jim Lanenberg and Jane Grimsrud in the amount of
$133 to purchase and plant shrubs by the pond area at Westwood Hills Nature Center.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Does the City Council wish to accept the gifts with restrictions on use?
BACKGROUND:
State statute requires City Council’s acceptance of donations. This requirement is necessary in
order to make sure the City Council has knowledge of any restrictions placed on the use of each
donation prior to it being expended.
Westwood Hills Nature Center friends of Jim Lanenberg and Jane Grimsrud are graciously
donating an amount of $133. Jim Lanenberg and Jane Grimsrud were volunteers at the Nature
Center for many years. They both recently passed away and the donation is in tribute to them.
The donation is given with the restriction that it be used to purchase shrubs and install them by
the pond area at Westwood Hills Nature Center.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
This donation will be used for the purchase and installation of shrubs for the pond area at
Westwood Hills Nature Center.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
The donation will assist us in preserving, enhancing and providing good stewardship of our
parks.
Attachments: Resolution
Prepared by: Stacy Voelker, Administrative Secretary
Mark Oestreich, Manager of Westwood Hills Nature Center
Reviewed by: Cindy Walsh, Director of Parks and Recreation
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4f) Page 2
Subject: Acceptance of Monetary Donation in Memory of Jim Lanenberg and Jane Grimsrud
RESOLUTION NO. 12-___
RESOLUTION APPROVING ACCEPTANCE OF DONATIONS
IN MEMORY OF JIM LANENBERG AND JANE GRIMSRUD
IN THE AMOUNT OF $133 FOR THE PURCHASE OF
SHRUBS TO BE INSTALLED BY THE POND AREA
AT WESTWOOD HILLS NATURE CENTER
WHEREAS, The City of St. Louis Park is required by State statute to authorize
acceptance of any donations; and
WHEREAS, the City Council must also ratify any restrictions placed on the donation by
the donor; and
WHEREAS, the Westwood Hills Nature Center friends of Jim Lanenberg and Jane
Grimsrud desire to purchase and plant shrubs for the pond area at Westwood Hills Nature Center
with a donation of $133; and
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by th e City Council of the City of St. Louis
Park that the gift is hereby accepted with thanks to the Westwood Hills Nature Center friends of
Jim Lanenberg and Jane Grimsrud with the understanding that it must be used to purchase shrubs
and install them by the pond area at Westwood Hills Nature Center.
Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council July 16, 2012
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Meeting Date: July 16, 2012
Agenda Item #: 4g
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Acceptance of Monetary Donation in Memory of Anne Goldberg
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to Adopt Resolution approving acceptance of monetary donations from the Family and
Friends of Anne Goldberg in the amount of $646 for Westwood Hills Nature Center.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Does the City Council wish to accept the gift with restrictions on its use?
BACKGROUND:
State statute requires City Council’s acceptance of donations. This requirement is necessary in
order to make sure the City Council has knowledge of any restrictions placed on the use of each
donation prior to it being expended.
The Family and Friends of Anne Goldberg are graciously donating an amount of $646. Anne
Goldberg recently passed away and the donation is in tribute to her. The donation is given with
the restriction that it be used to toward a bench to be placed at Westwood Hills Nature Center.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
This donation will be used toward a bench to be placed at Westwood Hills Nature Center.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
The donation will assist us in preserving, enhancing and providing good stewardship of our
parks.
Attachments: Resolution
Prepared by: Stacy Voelker, Administrative Secretary
Mark Oestreich, Manager of Westwood Hills Nature Center
Reviewed by: Cindy Walsh, Director of Parks and Recreation
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4g) Page 2
Subject: Acceptance of Monetary Donation in Memory of Anne Goldberg
RESOLUTION NO. 12-____
RESOLUTION APPROVING ACCEPTANCE OF DONATION
IN MEMORY OF JANE GOLDBERG
IN THE AMOUNT OF $646
TOWARD A BENCH
AT WESTWOOD HILLS NATURE CENTER
WHEREAS, The City of St. Louis Park is required by State statute to authorize
acceptance of any donations; and
WHEREAS, the City Council must also ratify any restrictions placed on the donation by
the donor; and
WHEREAS, the family and friends of Anne Goldberg desire to assist in the purchase
and installation of a bench at Westwood Hills Nature Center with a donation of $646; and
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of St. Louis
Park that the gift is hereby accepted with thanks to the family and friends of Anne Goldberg with
the understanding that it must be used to purchase and install a bench at Westwood Hills Nature
Center.
Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council July 16, 2012
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Meeting Date: July 16, 2012
Agenda Item #: 4h
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Final Payment Resolution - Contract 139-11 Northdale Construction Company, Inc. – Project
No. 2007-2400
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to Adopt Resolution authorizing final payment in the amount of $20,282.06 and
accepting work for the Taft Storm Water Lift Station with Northdale Construction Company
Project No. 2007-2400, City Contract No. 139-11.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
BACKGROUND:
Bids were received on August 25, 2011 for Phase I of the Taft Storm Water Lift Station
Improvements – Project No. 2007-2400. The project includes work on Taft Storm Water Lift
Station located in the southwest corner of South Oak Pond. The work includes installation of a
new gravity flow storm sewer pipe, a wet well structure which will house new pumps, force main
piping and other appurtenances of the piping system.
City Council awarded the project to Northdale Construction Company, Inc. on September 6,
2011 in the amount of $203,434.28. The Contractor completed this work within the contract
time allowed at a final contract cost of $215,920.12 including two change orders: The two
change orders amounted to $15,288.84 for additional excavation, survey work, and installation of
a pipe bend not provided for in the original contract and additional excavation and installation of
one section of 42” concrete pipe. There was also an under run of contract items amounting to
$2,803.00.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
Phase I of this project was programmed in the Capital Improvement Program (C.I.P.) for
construction in 2011/12 at a total projected cost of $275,000. This project will be funded by the
Storm Water Utility.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
Attachments: Resolution
Prepared by: Jim Olson, Engineering Project Manager
Reviewed by: Mike Rardin, Public Works Director
Scott Brink, City Engineer
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4h) Page 2
Subject: Final Payment Resolution - Contract 139-11 Northdale Const – Project 2007-2400
RESOLUTION NO. 12-
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING FINAL PAYMENT IN THE
AMOUNT OF $20,282.06 AND ACCEPTING THE WORK FOR THE
TAFT STORM WATER LIFT STATION PROJECT
WITH NORTHDALE CONSTRUCTION
CITY PROJECT NO. 2007-2400
CONTRACT NO. 139-11
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of St. Louis
Park, Minnesota, as follows:
1. Pursuant to a written contract with the City dated September 6, 2011, Northdale Construction
Company, Inc. has satisfactorily completed the Taft Storm Water Lift Station Project, as per
Contract No. 139-11.
2. The Director of Public Works has filed his recommendations for final acceptance of the work.
3. The work completed under this contract is accepted and approved. The City Manager is
directed to make final payment on the contract, taking the contractor's receipt in full.
Original Contract Price $ 203,434.28
Change Order 1 $ 11,106.44
Change Order 2 $ 4,182.40
Underrun $ (2,803.00)
Contract Amount $ 218,723.12
Previous Payments $ 195,638.06
Balance Due $ 20,282.06
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council July 16, 2012
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Meeting Date: July 16, 2012
Agenda Item #: 4i
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Final Payment Resolution - Contract 121-11 Keys Well Drilling Company – Project No. 2011-1401
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to Adopt Resolution authorizing final payment in the amount of $8,559.13 and accepting
work for Water Project – Well Redevelopment (SLP 14) with Keys Well Drilling Company
Project No. 2011-1401, City Contract No. 121-11.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
BACKGROUND:
Bids were received on July 8, 2011 for Water Project - Well Redevelopment (SLP 14) - Project
No. 2011-1401. The project involved work on Municipal well SLP 14 (Prairie du-Chein aquifer),
located at Water Treatment Plant 10 on Cedar Lake Road. The redevelopment of Municipal Well
SLP14 included the removal of the screen and gravel pack, removal and disposal of sand
material in the well hole, redevelopment of the well hole, and installation of pump and pump
appurtenances. The project also included the purchase and installation of a new high efficiency
motor.
City Council awarded the project to Keys Well Drilling Company on July 18, 2011 in the
amount of $189,345.00. The Contractor completed work at a final contract cost of $171,182.50
including two change orders: Change Order No. 1 amounted to an increase of $7,240.00 for
installation of new pump bowls; Change Order No. 2 provides for additional contract time
adding 60 days to the completion date which was needed for further well-hole development and
test pumping to properly reduce the sand content suspended in the water. The project also had an
underrun of $25,402.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
This project was programmed in the Capital Improvement Program (C.I.P.) for construction in
2011/12 at a total projected cost of $231,000. This project is being funded by the Water Utility.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
Attachments: Resolution
Prepared by: Jim Olson, Engineering Project Manager
Reviewed by: Mike Rardin, Public Works Director
Scott Brink, City Engineer
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4i) Page 2
Subject: Final Payment Resolution - Contract 121-11 Keys Well Drilling Co. – Project 2011-1401
RESOLUTION NO. 12-
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING FINAL PAYMENT IN THE
AMOUNT OF $8,559.13 AND ACCEPTING THE WORK FOR
WATER PROJECT – WELL REDEVELOPMENT (SLP 14)
WITH KEYS WELL DRILLING COMPANY
CITY PROJECT NO. 2011-1401
CONTRACT NO. 121-11
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of St. Louis
Park, Minnesota, as follows:
1. Pursuant to a written contract with the City dated July 18, 2011, Keys Well Drilling Company
has satisfactorily completed Water Project – Well Redevelopment (SLP 14), as per Contract No.
121-11.
2. The Director of Public Works has filed his recommendations for final acceptance of the work.
3. The work completed under this contract is accepted and approved. The City Manager is
directed to make final payment on the contract, taking the contractor's receipt in full.
Original Contract Price $ 189,345.00
Change Order 1 $ 7,240.00
Change Order 2 $0.00
Underrun $(25,402.50)
Contract Amount $ 196,585.00
Previous Payments $ 162,623.37
Balance Due $ 8,559.13
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council July 16, 2012
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Meeting Date: July 16, 2012
Agenda Item #: 4j
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Final Payment Resolution - Contract 112-11 Pearson Brothers, Inc. – Project No. 2011-0001
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to Adopt Resolution accepting work and authorizing final payment in the amount of
$10,435.16 for the 2011 City Sealcoat Project with Pearson Brothers, Inc. - Project No. 2011-
0001, City Contract No. 112-11.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Does the City Council wish to approve this final contract payment?
BACKGROUND:
City Council approved undertaking the 2011 Sealcoat Project – City Project No. 2011-0001 last
year. The project was advertised, bid and awarded to Pearson Brothers, Inc. on July 18, 2011 in
the amount of $213,863.28. This project included sealcoating selected streets in Pavement
Management Area 3 which comprises the neighborhoods of Cedar Manor, Crestview, Westdale,
Westwood Hills and Kilmer Pond neighborhoods.
The Contractor completed this work this spring within the contract time allowed (10 days) at a
final contract cost of $208,703.12. The project had underruns amounting to $5,160.16.
Last year’s sealcoat work in the Kilmer Neighborhood was affected by heavy rains which lead to
significant loss of the sealcoat rock. To correct the problem, the contractor re-sealcoated the
neighborhood this spring at no additional cost.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
The cost for this project was accounted for in the 2011 capital budget. The work will be paid for
using Pavement Management Funds.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
Attachments: Resolution
Prepared by: Jim Olson, Engineering Project Manager
Reviewed by: Scott Brink, City Engineer
Mike Rardin, Public Works Director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4j) Page 2
Subject: Final Payment Resolution - Contract 112-11 Pearson Brothers Inc – Project No. 20110-0001
RESOLUTION NO. 12-___
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING FINAL PAYMENT IN THE
AMOUNT OF $10,435.16 FOR THE 2011 CITY SEALCOAT PROJECT
WITH PEARSON BROTHERS, INC. ACCEPTING WORK ON
CONTRACT SEALCOATING
CITY PROJECT NO. 2011-0001
CONTRACT NO. 112-11
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, as
follows:
1. Pursuant to a written contract with the City dated July 18, 2011, Pearson Brothers, Inc.
has satisfactorily completed the contract sealcoating, as per Contract No. 112-11.
2. The Director of Public Works has filed his recommendations for final acceptance of the
work.
3. The work completed under this contract is accepted and approved. The City Manager is
directed to make final payment on the contract, taking the contractor's receipt in full.
Original Contract Price $ 213,863.28
Change Orders .00
Underruns $ 5,160.16
Contract Amount $ 208,703.12
Previous Payments $ 198,267.96
Balance Due $ 10,435.16
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council July 16, 2012
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Meeting Date: July 16, 2012
Agenda Item #: 4k
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Bid Tabulation: Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Boulevard at Park Summit - Project #2012-1306
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to designate Hardrives, Inc. the lowest responsible bidder and authorize execution of a
contract with the firm in the amount of $436,634.50 for the Traffic Signal Project – Park Center
Boulevard at Park Summit, Project No. 2012-1306.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Does the City Council wish to take the final step to allow this project to move forward?
BACKGROUND:
Bid Information:
Bids were received on July 9, 2012 for the Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Boulevard at
Park Summit. This project involves the mill and overlay of the northerly 600 feet of Park Center
Boulevard, construction and re-alignment of driveways, median modification and the installation of a
new traffic signal on Park Center Boulevard at a location approximately 400 feet south of 36th Street.
The intersection will have pedestrian activated cross walk signals and count down timers. The trail
that accesses Wolfe Park will be reconfigured to utilize this signalized crossing. The center median
will be landscaped similar to the other islands along Park Center Boulevard and will be maintained as
part of the service district. The project will be constructed under traffic (no detours); motorists
will be guided through the work zone during periods of temporary lane closures.
An advertisement for bids was published in the St. Louis Park Sun-Sailor on June 21, and 28,
2012 and in the Construction Bulletin on June 25, and July 2, 2012. In addition, plans and
specifications are noticed on the City Website and are made available electronically via the
internet by our vendor Quest CDN.com. Email notification is provided to five minority
associations and final printed plans are made available for viewing at the AGC of Minnesota
Planroom and at City Hall.
Twenty-eight contractors purchased plan sets with four Disadvantaged Business Enterprises
(DBE’s) identifying themselves as subcontractors.
A total of five (5) bids were received for this project. A summary of the bid results is as follows:
CONTRACTOR BID AMOUNT
Hardrives, Inc. $436,634.50
Forest Lake Contracting $443,605.50
Bituminous Roadways $444,132.00
Thomas and Sons Construction $479,786.10
Midwest Asphalt $483,788.00
Engineer’s Estimate $450,230.00
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4k) Page 2
Subject: Bid Tabulation: Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj. No. 2012-1306
Evaluation of Bids:
Staff has reviewed all of the bids submitted and has tabulated the results. From the review, staff
recommends Hardrives, Inc. as the lowest responsible bidder. Hardrives, Inc. is an experienced
contractor that has worked for the City before and has successfully completed previous contracts.
Construction Timeline:
Construction is tentatively planned to begin in early August and is expected to be completed by
mid-November.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
This project has been programmed in the Capital Improvement Program (C.I.P.) for construction
in 2012. This project will be funded by three sources; the City of St. Louis Park Municipal State
Aid funds (gas tax monies), Target Corporation and Park Summit.
Based on the low bid received, total project cost and funding details, previously estimated at
$634,500, are revised slightly downward as follows:
Expenditures
Construction Cost $436,634.50
Engineering & Administration $191,521.76
Total $628,156.26
Funding Sources
Municipal State Aid Funds $244,300.00
Target Corporation $199,500.00
Park Summit $184,356.26
Total $628,156.26
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
Attachments: None
Prepared by: Jack Sullivan, Engineering Project Manager
Reviewed by: Scott Brink, City Engineer
Michael P. Rardin, Director of Public Works
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
Meeting Date: July 16, 2012
Agenda Item #: 4l
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Target Corporation Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Boulevard at Park Summit - Project
#2012-1306
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to enter in to a Public Improvement Agreement with Target Corporation for the Traffic
Signal Project – Park Center Boulevard at Park Summit, Project No. 2012-1306.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Does Council desire to move forward with this project as identified in the City’s Capital
Improvement Program (C.I.P.)?
BACKGROUND:
History
On June 18, 2012 Council adopted a resolution accepting the project report, establishing
improvement Project No. 2012-1306, approving plans and specification and authorizing
advertisement for bids for this improvement project.
At that time staff had reached a tentative agreement with Target Corporation for the remaining
50 percent cost share of the signal installation and subsequent costs associated with the
intersection relocation. Since that date Target has executed the Public Improvement Agreement.
Bids for this work were opened on July 9, 2012, and award of a contract is being presented as a
separate Council item for this July 16, 2012 regular Council meeting. Presuming a contract is
awarded July 16, construction is expected to commence on this project in early August.
Summary and Recommendations
The City Attorney has reviewed the Public Improvement Agreement with Target Corporation
and finds the agreement language acceptable.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
This project was agreed to and approved by the City Council in conjunction with their approvals
for the Park Summit redevelopment project. Project funding will be provided by three sources,
the City of St. Louis Park Municipal State Aid funds, Target Corporation per the attached Public
Improvement Agreement and Park Summit Development Agreement.
Target Corporation has agreed per the Public Improvement Agreement to fund up to $199,500 of
the costs for work associated with the relocation of intersection and 50 percent of the signal
installation.
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l) Page 2
Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306
Approximately $30,000 is for construction to Target’s parking lot which is impacted by the
intersection relocation. Target has requested that this work and associated costs be included as
part of their Public Improvement Agreement and wrapped into Target’s cost obligations
accordingly.
Based on the low bid received, total project cost and funding details, previously estimated at
$634,500, have been revised slightly downward so project costs and funding are within
previously agreed to limits.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
Attachments: Public Improvement Agreement – Target Corporation
Prepared by: Jack Sullivan, Engineering Project Manager
Reviewed by: Scott Brink, City Engineer
Michael P. Rardin, Director of Public Works
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l) Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306Page 3
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l) Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306Page 4
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l) Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306Page 5
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l) Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306Page 6
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l) Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306Page 7
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l) Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306Page 8
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l) Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306Page 9
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l) Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306Page 10
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l)
Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306 Page 11
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l)
Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306 Page 12
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l)
Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306 Page 13
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l)
Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306 Page 14
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l)
Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306 Page 15
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l)
Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306 Page 16
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l)
Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306 Page 17
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l)
Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306 Page 18
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l)
Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306 Page 19
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l)
Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306 Page 20
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l)
Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306 Page 21
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l)
Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306 Page 22
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l)
Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306 Page 23
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l)
Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306 Page 24
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l)
Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306 Page 25
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l)
Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306 Page 26
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l)
Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306 Page 27
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l)
Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306 Page 28
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l)
Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306 Page 29
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l)
Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306 Page 30
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l)
Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306 Page 31
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l)
Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306 Page 32
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l)
Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306 Page 33
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l)
Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306 Page 34
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l)
Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306 Page 35
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l)
Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306 Page 36
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l)
Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306 Page 37
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l)
Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306 Page 38
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l)
Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306 Page 39
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l)
Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306 Page 40
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l)
Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306 Page 41
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l)
Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306 Page 42
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l)
Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306 Page 43
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l)
Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306 Page 44
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l) Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306Page 45
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l) Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306Page 46
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l)
Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306 Page 47
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l) Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306Page 48
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l) Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306Page 49
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l) Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306Page 50
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l) Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306Page 51
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l) Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306Page 52
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l) Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306Page 53
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l) Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306Page 54
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l) Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306Page 55
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l) Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306Page 56
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l) Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306Page 57
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l) Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306Page 58
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4l) Subject: Target Corporation - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Blvd at Park Summit; Proj 2012-1306Page 59
Meeting Date: July 16, 2012
Agenda Item #: 4m
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Consultant Contract - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Boulevard at Park Summit - Project
#2012-1306
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to approve Consultant Contract for construction administration services and traffic signal
timing for Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Boulevard at Park Summit, Project No. 2012-
1306.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Does Council desire to move forward with this project as identified in the City’s Capital
Improvement Program (C.I.P.)?
BACKGROUND:
History
A traffic study was completed in the spring of 2011 by SRF Consulting Group as part of the
review and approval process for the Park Summit redevelopment in the southeast corner of Park
Center Boulevard and 36th Street. The recommendation of the traffic study was to consolidate
the access of the Park Summit Redevelopment site, the access to Parkshore Assisted Living and
the two accesses to the Target store into one signalized intersection. Park Summit
redevelopment entered into a PUD Development Contract with the City on October 21, 2011 for
the work necessary to consolidate access and to fund 50 percent of the costs to install a traffic
signal.
SRF Consulting Group then completed the plans and specifications for the project that includes
the mill and overlay of the northerly 600 feet of Park Center Boulevard, construction and re-
alignment of driveways, median modification and the installation of a new traffic signal on Park
Center Boulevard at a location approximately 400 feet south of 36th Street.
Construction plans were presented to the Council for approval at its June 18, 2012 regular
meeting, and an advertisement for bids was authorized. Bids were opened on July 9, 2012, and
award of a contract is being presented as a separate Council item for the July 16, 2012 regular
Council meeting. Presuming a contract is awarded July 16, construction is expected to
commence on this project in early August.
Additional Professional Services
SRF’s current contract with the City for the Park Place Boulevard project covers design services
(plans and specifications) only. Construction engineering services will be required during the
course of construction. These services generally include inspection, contract management and
administration. SRF has provided a proposal dated June 26, 2012 that details the scope of
services (including estimated fees) required to successfully complete the project. The services
proposed can be summarized as follows:
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4m) Page 2
Subject: Consultant Contract - Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Boulevard at Park Summit; Proj. No. 2012-1306
Construction Observation/Supervision $ 11,064
Construction Administration $ 8,862
Project Management/Technical Assistance $ 9,749
Signal Timing $ 3,614
Direct Expenses/Reimbursable $ 1,711
Total (Not to Exceed Cost) $ 35,000
In summary, it is proposed that the City hire SRF for construction engineering services and
related tasks as described above. Based on past experience, SRF provides quality work and good
project management at competitive rates. Subcontractors (consultants) may be used by SRF as
proposed or as otherwise approved by the city. All work performed under this contract is paid
for on a time and materials basis.
The following terms will be incorporated into this contract:
1. Work is expected to begin in July 2012 and be completed by July 2013 (two construction
seasons)
2. Compensation is based on actual work performed with a maximum contract amount of
$35,000
3. SRF has independent contractor status.
4. City may terminate this contract with seven (7) days notice
The document utilized for this contract is the City’s standard professional services agreement
developed by the City Attorney. SRF’s June 26 2012 proposal will be referenced and attached as
part of the agreement.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
The proposed services by SRF Consulting Group have been incorporated into the overall project
costs for the Traffic Signal Project – Park Center Boulevard project. The costs for these services
will be split between the City, Target Corporation and Park Summit.
City of St. Louis Park $13,650
Target Corporation $11,200
Park Summit $10,150
Total $35,000
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
Attachments: None
Prepared by: Jack Sullivan, Engineering Project Manager
Reviewed by: Scott Brink, City Engineer
Michael P. Rardin, Director of Public Works
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
Meeting Date: July 16, 2012
Agenda Item #: 4n
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Special Assessment - Sewer Service Line Repair at 2924 Ottawa Avenue South
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to Adopt Resolution authorizing the special assessment for the repair of the sewer service
line at 2924 Ottawa Avenue South, St. Louis Park, MN – P.I.D. 31-029-24-34-0096.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
The proposed action is consistent with policy previously established by the City Council.
BACKGROUND:
James and Courtney Flaherty, owners of the single family residence at 2924 Ottawa Avenue South,
have requested the City to authorize the repair of the sewer service line for their home and assess the
cost against the property in accordance with the City’s special assessment policy.
Analysis:
The City requires the repair of service lines to promote the general public health, safety and welfare
within the community. The special assessment policy for the repair or replacement of sewer service
lines for existing homes was adopted by the City Council in 1996. This program was put into place
because sometimes property owners face financial hardships when emergency repairs like this are
unexpectedly required.
Plans and permits for this service line repair work were completed, submitted, and approved by City
staff. The property owners hired a contractor and repaired the sewer service line in compliance with
current codes and regulations. Based on the completed work, this repair qualifies for the City’s
special assessment program. The property owners have petitioned the City to authorize the sewer
service line repair and special assess the cost of the repair. The total eligible cost of the repair has
been determined to be $1,895.00.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
The City has funds in place to finance the cost of this special assessment.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
Attachments: Resolution
Prepared by: Scott Anderson, Utility Superintendent
Through: Mike Rardin, Public Works Director
Brian Swanson, Controller
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4n) Page 2
Subject: Special Assessment – Sewer Service Line Repair at 2924 Ottawa Avenue South
RESOLUTION NO. 12-____
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
FOR THE REPAIR OF THE SEWER SERVICE LINE AT
2924 OTTAWA AVENUE SOUTH, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN
P.I.D. 31-029-24-34-0096
WHEREAS, the Property Owners at 2924 Ottawa Avenue South have petitioned the
City of St. Louis Park to authorize a special assessment for the repair of the sewer service line
for the single family residence located at 2924 Ottawa Avenue South; and
WHEREAS, the Property Owners have agreed to waive the right to a public hearing,
right of notice and right of appeal pursuant to Minnesota Statute, Chapter 429; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park has received a report from the
Utility Superintendent related to the repair of the sewer service line.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis
Park, Minnesota, that:
1. The petition from the Property Owners requesting the approval and special assessment for
the sewer service line repair is hereby accepted.
2. The sewer service line repair that was done in conformance with the plans and specifications
approved by the Public Works Department and Department of Inspections is hereby
accepted.
3. The total cost for the repair of the sewer service line is accepted at $1,895.00.
4. The Property Owners have agreed to waive the right to a public hearing, notice and appeal
from the special assessment; whether provided by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, or by
other statutes, or by ordinance, City Charter, the constitution, or common law.
5. The Property Owners have agreed to pay the City for the total cost of the above
improvements through a special assessment over a ten (10) year period at the interest rate of
5.85%.
6. The Property Owners have executed an agreement with the City and all other documents
necessary to implement the repair of the sewer service line and the special assessment of all
costs associated therewith.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council July 16, 2012
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Meeting Date: July 16, 2012
Agenda Item #: 4o
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Special Assessment - Water Service Line Repair at 1464 Idaho Avenue South
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to Adopt Resolution authorizing the special assessment for the repair of the water service
line at 1464 Idaho Avenue South, St. Louis Park, MN – PID 05 -117-21-43-0041.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
The proposed action is consistent with policy previously established by the City Council.
BACKGROUND:
Jaime Otto, owner of the single family residence at 1464 Idaho Avenue South, has requested the City
to authorize the repair of the water service line for his home and assess the cost against the property in
accordance with the City’s special assessment policy.
Analysis:
The City requires the repair of service lines to promote the general public health, safety and welfare
within the community. The special assessment policy for the repair or replacement of water or sewer
service lines for existing homes was adopted by the City Council in 1996. This program was put into
place because sometimes property owners face financial hardships when emergency repairs like this
are unexpectedly required.
Plans and permits for this service line repair work were completed, submitted, and approved by City
staff. The property owner hired a contractor and repaired the water service line in compliance with
current codes and regulations. Based on the completed work, this repair qualifies for the City’s
special assessment program. The property owner has petitioned the City to authorize the water service
line repair and special assess the cost of the repair. The total eligible cost of the repair has been
determined to be $4,080.00.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
The City has funds in place to finance the cost of this special assessment.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
Attachments: Resolution
Prepared by: Scott Anderson, Utility Superintendent
Through: Mike Rardin, Public Works Director
Brian Swanson, Controller
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4o) Page 2
Subject: Special Assessment – Water Service Line Repair at 1464 Idaho Avenue South
RESOLUTION NO. 12-____
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
FOR THE REPAIR OF THE WATER SERVICE LINE AT
1464 IDAHO AVENUE SOUTH, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN
P.I.D. 05-117-21-43-0041
WHEREAS, the Property Owner at 1464 Idaho Avenue South has petitioned the City of
St. Louis Park to authorize a special assessment for the repair of the water service line for the
single family residence located at 1464 Idaho Avenue South; and
WHEREAS, the Property Owner has agreed to waive the right to a public hearing, right
of notice and right of appeal pursuant to Minnesota Statute, Chapter 429; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park has received a report from the
Utility Superintendent related to the repair of the water service line.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis
Park, Minnesota, that:
1. The petition from the Property Owner requesting the approval and special assessment for the
water service line repair is hereby accepted.
2. The water service line repair that was done in conformance with the plans and specifications
approved by the Public Works Department and Department of Inspections is hereby
accepted.
3. The total cost for the repair of the water service line is accepted at $4,080.00.
4. The Property Owner has agreed to waive the right to a public hearing, notice and appeal from
the special assessment; whether provided by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, or by other
statutes, or by ordinance, City Charter, the constitution, or common law.
5. The Property Owner has agreed to pay the City for the total cost of the above improvements
through a special assessment over a ten (10) year period at the interest rate of 5.85 %.
6. The Property Owner has executed an agreement with the City and all other documents
necessary to implement the repair of the water service line and the special assessment of all
costs associated therewith.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council July 16, 2012
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Meeting Date: July 16, 2012
Agenda Item #: 4p
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Acceptance of Fire Department Open House Donations
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to Adopt Resolution accepting donations received from the following businesses during
the 2012 Fire Department Grand Opening and Open House:
• Northland Aluminum $300.00 Check
• Rainbow Foods $50.00 Gift Card
• Cub Foods $200.00 Gift Card
• Sam’s Club $100.00 Gift Card
• Costco $50.00 Gift Card
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Does the City Council wish to accept the donations?
BACKGROUND:
State statute requires City Council’s acceptance of donations. This requirement is necessary in
order to make sure the City Council has knowledge of any restrictions placed on the use of each
donation prior to it being expended.
These businesses have graciously donated to the Fire Department the items mentioned above in
support of the Fire Department Open House.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
These donations will assist the Fire Department in providing food and supplies needed for the
annual Fire Department Open House.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
Attachments: Resolution
Prepared by: Cary Smith, Assistant Chief
Reviewed by: Luke Stemmer, Fire Chief
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4p) Page 2
Subject: Acceptance of Fire Department Open House Donations
RESOLUTION NO. 12-_____
RESOLUTION APPROVING ACCEPTANCE OF
FIRE DEPARTMENT OPEN HOUSE DONATIONS
WHEREAS, The City of St. Louis Park is required by State statute to authorize
acceptance of any donations; and
WHEREAS, the City Council must also ratify any restrictions placed on the donation by
the donor; and
WHEREAS, these donations listed below will be directed toward the Fire Department
Open House;
• Northland Aluminum $300.00 Check
• Rainbow Foods $50.00 Gift Card
• Cub Foods $200.00 Gift Card
• Sam’s Club $100.00 Gift Card
• Costco $50.00 Gift Card
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of St. Louis
Park that these donations are hereby accepted with thanks and appreciation.
Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council July 16, 2012
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Meeting Date: July 16, 2012
Agenda Item #: 4q
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Medley Row Preliminary and Final Plat
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to Adopt Resolution granting approval for the Preliminary and Final Plat of Medley Row.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Does the proposed Preliminary and Final Plat meet the requirements of the Subdivision
Ordinance and is it consistent with the Hoigaard Village Planned Unit Development?
BACKGROUND:
Requested is a combined Preliminary and Final Plat for Medley Row townhomes in the Hoigaard
Village development located at West 36th St. and Highway 100. The plat is required to clarify
ownership of utility infrastructure within the individual townhomes, and if offered for sale in the
future, will clarify property interests for the owners.
Project Background:
Originally approved in 2005, Hoigaard Village development includes a total of 416 residential
units. Medley Row comprises 22 of the total number of units, and will be located immediately to
the west of the existing sub-regional stormwater pond on the Hoigaard Village site.
Building permits for the Adagio apartment building and the Medley Row townhomes were
issued on June 1st, 2012, and the project is currently under construction. The townhomes are
permitted under the approved Planned Unit Development (PUD) approval. To clarify ownership
for purposes of satisfying the requirements of the Minnesota State Building Code, the plat is
being brought forward at this time. There are no changes to the development associated with the
platting request.
Zoning and Preliminary/Final Plat Analysis:
The proposed Plat conforms to Zoning Ordinance regulations. The R-C Zoning District includes
a provision that allows for lots that are outside the normal guidelines when done for purposes of
creating condominium ownership. The Zoning Ordinance also allows for the creation of a PUD
within the R-C Zoning District, which enabled the developer to move forward with the Hoigaard
Village redevelopment. The PUD sets forth the design standards, site layout, and landscaping
plan for the Medley Row townhomes.
The Hoigaard Village development has an overall density of 42 units per acre, below the
maximum density of 50 units per acre allowed in the R-C Zoning District.
Preliminary and Final Plat
The plat of Medley Row includes the creation of three new blocks (Blocks 1 – 3) and a total of
twenty-two new lots. The plat also includes an outlot that will be commonly owned by the
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4q) Page 2
Subject: Medley Row Preliminary and Final Plat
owners of the townhomes, and will provide utility service and vehicular access to the garages
located in the interior courtyard. The proposed lots range in size from 1,400 square feet to 2,550
square feet.
Park and Trail Dedication
Park and Trail Dedication fees for the 22 new townhomes on the Medley Row site have been
paid by the developer.
Easements
The proposed easements for the Medley Row site are consistent with the Planned Unit
Development approvals for the overall Hoigaard Village redevelopment site and the Subdivision
Ordinance. The Medley Row townhomes are served by private infrastructure located in Outlot
A, which will be fully covered by a drainage and utility easement in favor of the City. The
Subdivision Ordinance, in Section 25-154 (e) allows for the creation of outlots as an alternative
measure to the typical requirement of drainage and utility easements along all property lines.
The Plat also includes proposed sidewalk easements in favor of the City surrounding the site, to
ensure that the sidewalks around the development site are fully accessible to all citizens.
Summary:
The proposed Preliminary and Final Plat conforms to the approved plans for the Hoigaard
Village and the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance. It will clarify ownership for
purposes of private utility access and potential future sale of units.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Approval of this Preliminary and Final Plat is consistent with the City’s Vision for maintaining
strong neighborhoods with a diversity of housing types within the City.
Attachments: Resolution of Approval
Draft Minutes – June 20th, 2012 Planning Commission Meeting
Preliminary Plat
Final Plat
Prepared by: Adam Fulton, Planner
Reviewed by: Meg McMonigal, Planning and Zoning Supervisor
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4q) Page 3
Subject: Medley Row Preliminary and Final Plat
RESOLUTION NO. 12-____
RESOLUTION GIVING APPROVAL FOR PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT OF
MEDLEY ROW
BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of St. Louis Park:
Findings
1. Medley Row, LLC (Frank Dunbar), owner and subdivider of the land proposed to
be platted as Medley Row has submitted an application for approval of preliminary and final plat
of said subdivision in the manner required for platting of land under the St. Louis Park
Ordinance Code, and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder.
2. The proposed preliminary and final plat has been found to be in all respects
consistent with the City Plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of
Minnesota and the ordinances of the City of St. Louis Park.
3. The proposed plat is situated upon the following described lands in Hennepin
County, Minnesota, to-wit:
Lot 1, Block 1, Hoigaard Village 2nd Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota
Conclusion
1. The proposed preliminary and final plat of Medley Row is hereby approved and
accepted by the City as being in accord and conformity with all ordinances, City plans and
regulations of the City of St. Louis Park and the laws of the State of Minnesota, provided,
however, that this approval is made subject to the opinion of the City Attorney and Certification
by the City Clerk subject to the following conditions:
a) The developer or owner shall pay an administrative fee of $750 per violation of
any condition of this approval.
b) The site remains subject to conditions imposed by City Council Resolution 12-
059 and the First Amendment to the Hoigaard Village PUD Development
Contract.
c) The site shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with the Official
Exhibits.
d) Prior to release of the Mylars, the developer shall provide a financial guarantee of
$1,000 to ensure the return of a signed Mylar copy of the Plat to the City.
2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to supply two certified copies of this Resolution
to the above-named owner and subdivider, who is the applicant herein.
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4q) Page 4
Subject: Medley Row Preliminary and Final Plat
3. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute all contracts
required herein, and the City Clerk is hereby directed to execute the certificate of approval on
behalf of the City Council upon the said plat when all of the conditions set forth in Paragraph
No. 1 above and the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code have been fulfilled.
4. Such execution of the certificate upon said plat by the City Clerk, as required
under Section 26-123(1)j of the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code, shall be conclusive showing of
proper compliance therewith by the subdivider and City officials charged with duties above
described and shall entitle such plat to be placed on record forthwith without further formality.
The City Clerk is instructed to record certified copies of this resolution in the Office of the
Hennepin County Register of Deeds or Registrar of Titles as the case may be.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council July 16, 2012
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4q) Page 5
Subject: Medley Row Preliminary and Final Plat
D R A F T
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
June 20, 2012 – 6:00 p.m.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MEMBERS PRESENT: Claudia Johnston-Madison, Robert Kramer, Dennis Morris,
Carl Robertson
MEMBERS ABSENT: Lynne Carper, Richard Person, Larry Shapiro
STAFF PRESENT: Meg McMonigal, Gary Morrison, Sean Walther, Scott Brink,
Nancy Sells
* * * * *
B. Preliminary and Final Plat – Medley Row (Hoigaard Village)
Location: W. 36th St. and Highway 100
Applicant: Medley Row, LLC
Case No.: 12-16-S
Ms. McMonigal presented the staff report. She explained that the plat is for the 22
Medley Row townhomes in the Hoigaard Village development that were previously
approved. The plat is required to clarify ownership of utility infrastructure within the
individual townhomes.
Commissioner Morris asked about the very small five foot jog in each lot.
The applicant, Frank Dunbar, Dunbar Development, said the condenser and gas line for
each unit account for the small jog seen on the plat.
Chair Kramer opened the public hearing. As no one was present wishing to speak, he
closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Johnston-Madison made a motion recommending approval of the
Preliminary and Final Plat, subject to conditions. Commissioner Robertson seconded the
motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 4-0.
by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others
Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities.
deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the
at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or
revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made
files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional
may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing
or for completion of this project by others without written approval
shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project,
for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files
are instruments of the Consultant professional services
CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project
W:\2007\07076D\CADD DATA\SURVEYPlotted: 05 /14 / 2012 10:39 AMI hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was
prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that
I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws
of the State of Minnesota.
PRELIMINARY PLAT GENERAL NOTES
SURVEYOR:OWNER/DEVELOPER:
Loucks Associates, Inc.Medley Row, LLC
7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 5000 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 200
Maple Grove, MN 55330 St. Louis Park, MN 55422
763-424-5505 763-377-7090
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Lot 1, Block 1, Hoigaard Village 2nd Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
DATE OF PREPARATION:
May 10, 2012
BENCHMARK:
Top nut of hydrant located at the southeast corner of Xenwood Ave. S. & Camerata Way as shown.
Elev. = 906.91 (City of St. Louis Park Datum)
EXISTING ZONING:
Zone (R-A)
PROPOSED ZONING:
Zone (PUD)
AREAS:
Total Property Area = 42,983 Sq.Ft. or 0.98 Acres
Lot 1, Block 1=2,484 Sq.Ft. or 0.05 Acres
Lot 2, Block 1=1,439 Sq.Ft. or 0.03 Acres
Lot 3, Block 1=1,439 Sq.Ft. or 0.03 Acres
Lot 4, Block 1=1,439 Sq.Ft. or 0.03 Acres
Lot 5, Block 1=1,439 Sq.Ft. or 0.03 Acres
Lot 6, Block 1=1,439 Sq.Ft. or 0.03 Acres
Lot 7, Block 1=1,439 Sq.Ft. or 0.03 Acres
Lot 8, Block 1=1,875 Sq.Ft. or 0.04 Acres
Lot 1, Block 2=2,550 Sq.Ft. or 0.05 Acres
Lot 2, Block 2=1,426 Sq.Ft. or 0.03 Acres
Lot 3, Block 2=1,400 Sq.Ft. or 0.03 Acres
Lot 4, Block 2=1,400 Sq.Ft. or 0.03 Acres
Lot 5, Block 2=1,400 Sq.Ft. or 0.03 Acres
Lot 6, Block 2=2,488 Sq.Ft. or 0.05 Acres
Lot 1, Block 3=1,875 Sq.Ft. or 0.04 Acres
Lot 2, Block 3=1,439 Sq.Ft. or 0.03 Acres
Lot 3, Block 3=1,439 Sq.Ft. or 0.03 Acres
Lot 4, Block 3=1,439 Sq.Ft. or 0.03 Acres
Lot 5, Block 3=1,439 Sq.Ft. or 0.03 Acres
Lot 6, Block 3=1,439 Sq.Ft. or 0.03 Acres
Lot 7, Block 3=1,439 Sq.Ft. or 0.03 Acres
Lot 8, Block 3=2,481 Sq.Ft. or 0.05 Acres
Outlot A=6,331 Sq.Ft. or 0.14 Acres
FLOOD ZONE DESIGNATION:
This property is contained in Zone X (areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain)
per Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel No. 27053C0353E, effective date of September 2, 2004.
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4q)
Subject: Medley Row Preliminary and Final Plat Page 6
N
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4q)
Subject: Medley Row Preliminary and Final Plat Page 7
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4q)
Subject: Medley Row Preliminary and Final Plat Page 8
Meeting Date: July 16, 2012
Agenda Item #: 4r
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Resolution Rescinding Resolution 91-146 Relating to a Previous Use of the Highway 7
Corporate Center Site at 7003 West Lake Street
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to Adopt Resolution rescinding Resolution 91-146 relating to a previous use of the
Highway 7 Corporate Center site at 7003 West Lake Street.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
BACKGROUND:
The owner of the Highway 7 Corporate Center at 7003 West Lake Street has requested the City
rescind a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) that was granted for a previous use of the site in order to
clear the memorial of the CUP from the Certificate of Title.
The uses for which Resolution 91-146 was adopted have ceased operation, the buildings have
been demolished, and the subject property has been platted and redeveloped.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
Attachments: Resolution to Rescind Resolution No. 91-146
Resolution No. 91-146
Prepared by: Sean Walther, Senior Planner
Reviewed by: Meg McMonigal, Planning and Zoning Supervisor
Kevin Locke, Community Development Director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4r) Page 2
Subject: Resolution Rescinding Resolution 91-146 Relating to Use of Corporate Center Site at 7003 W Lake St
RESOLUTION NO. 12-___
RESOLUTION RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 91-146 RELATING TO A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR 7003 WEST LAKE STREET
FINDINGS
WHEREAS, Highway 7 Business Center LLC (Paul Hyde, CEO) is the current owner of
the property located at 7003 West Lake Street; legally described as:
Lot 1, Block 1, RER ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
WHEREAS, Highway 7 Business Center LLC submitted a written request dated June 20,
2012, to the City of St. Louis Park requesting that the City Council rescind Resolution 91-146
pertaining to the above referenced property;
WHEREAS, Resolution 91-146 (Recorded as Doc. No. 2196914) granting a Special
(Conditional Use) Permit for remedial measures related to on-site soil contamination, a
temporary parking lot, open storage, and restating non-conforming rights for an auto reduction
yard at 7003 West Lake Street was adopted on August 5, 1991;
WHEREAS, the uses for which Resolution 91-146 was adopted have ceased operation,
the buildings have been demolished, and the subject property has been platted and redeveloped;
WHEREAS, the purpose of this resolution is to remove the memorial of the Conditional
Use Permit granted by Resolution 91-146 from the Certificate of Title for the property inasmuch
as the permit is no longer applicable to the property.
CONCLUSION
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Resolution No. 91-146 recorded as
document number 2196914 is hereby rescinded. Prior Resolutions 2400 and 87-137 recorded as
document number 1879159 which were rescinded and replaced by Resolution 91-146 shall
remain rescinded.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council July 16, 2012
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4r)
Subject: Resolution Rescinding Resolution 91-146 Relating to Use of Corporate Center Site at 7003 W Lake St
Page 3
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4r)
Subject: Resolution Rescinding Resolution 91-146 Relating to Use of Corporate Center Site at 7003 W Lake St
Page 4
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4r)
Subject: Resolution Rescinding Resolution 91-146 Relating to Use of Corporate Center Site at 7003 W Lake St
Page 5
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4r)
Subject: Resolution Rescinding Resolution 91-146 Relating to Use of Corporate Center Site at 7003 W Lake St Page 6
Meeting Date: July 16, 2012
Agenda Item #: 4s
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Temporary On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for the Frank Lundberg American Legion
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to Approve a Temporary On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for the Frank Lundberg
American Legion Post 282, 5605 36th St. W. in St. Louis Park for an event to be held on August
4, 2012, in the parking lot at the American Legion.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Does Council wish to approve the temporary on-sale intoxicating liquor license for the Frank
Lundberg American Legion during their event being held in the American Legion parking lot on
August 4, 2012?
BACKGROUND:
The Frank Lundberg American Legion Post 282 has applied for a temporary liquor license for an
event to be held on Saturday, August 4, from 1:00 pm to 10:00 pm in the American Legion’s
parking lot located at 5605 W. 36th Street. Part of the parking lot will be fenced off and tented
for the event. Permission has also been granted by Burlington Coat Factory for the American
Legion to use their lot. There will be live music from 1:00-5:00 pm and a karaoke contest from
6:00-10:00 pm.
The Police Department has completed the background investigation on the principals and has
found no reason to deny the temporary license. The applicant has met all requirements for
issuance of the license, and staff is recommending approval.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
The fee for a temporary liquor license is $100.00 per day of the event.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
Attachments: None
Prepared by: Kay Midura, Office Assistant - Administration
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
Meeting Date: July 16, 2012
Agenda Item #: 4t
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Traffic Study Number 634: Authorize the Installation of Permit Parking Restrictions along Both
Sides of France Avenue from 3328 France Avenue to W. 34th Street
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
Motion to Adopt Resolution authorizing the installation of permit parking restrictions along both
sides of France Avenue from 3328 France Avenue to W. 34th Street.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Does the City Council wish to authorize the installation of permit parking restrictions as noted in
this staff report?
BACKGROUND:
In 2010, a major amendment to the Ellipse PUD was approved. As a part of this approval, permit
parking was installed along the west side of France Avenue in front of the two homes on the
3400 block of France and on both sides of W. 34th Street from France Avenue to midblock.
There were also some “No Parking” restrictions put into place on the east side of France Avenue
and on the west side, south of the permit parking. The permit parking was installed due to the
concern that parking from the Ellipse would spill over into the neighborhood, which neighbors
did not want.
The permit parking that was installed in 2010 appears to be working well, with no complaints
from the residents who have permit parking in front of their home. Other neighbors are now
complaining of spillover parking from the Ellipse, and worry that it will get worse with the
upcoming Ellipse II development. They are requesting that permit parking be installed on both
sides of France Avenue from 3328 France Avenue to W. 34th Street. Historically, we have only
installed permit parking directly in front of individual residents’ homes. The intent of the permit
parking is to ensure that residents are able to park in front of their home when there are other
heavy parking uses in the area. The current request also includes the east side of France Avenue,
in front of the Minneapolis Golf Course. This area would then be open to the residents within the
permit parking area, but people from the Ellipse developments would not be able to park there.
Staff explored several options with the neighborhood for the east side of France Avenue: 1)
leaving it unrestricted, 2) posting it “No Parking Anytime,” 3) various time limits/time frames
for restricted parking, and 4) permit parking. Residents did not want to leave it unrestricted, as
that would allow people from the Ellipse to park there. They also did not want parking
restrictions in place that would affect their ability to use the east side of France Avenue as
parking for themselves and their guests. Residents are therefore requesting permit parking on the
east side of France Avenue as well.
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4t) Page 2
Subject: TS 634: Permit Parking Restrictions on France Ave from 3328 France Ave to W. 34th St
Staff has worked with residents in the neighborhood on this request for quite some time. Several
letters have gone out to all the residents on the 3300 block of France Avenue, as well as ongoing
conversations with the neighborhood president and individual residents of the 3300 block of
France Avenue. This request now appears to be a consensus among the neighbors, as there were
no responses to a letter that went out on June 22, 2012, explaining the current request and giving
the July 16 date for Council action.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
The cost of enacting these controls is minimal and will come out of the general operating budget.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
Attachments: Resolution
Map
Prepared by: Laura Adler, Engineering Program Coordinator
Reviewed by: Scott A. Brink, City Engineer
Michael Rardin, Director of Public Works
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4t) Page 3
Subject: TS 634: Permit Parking Restrictions on France Ave from 3328 France Ave to W. 34th St
RESOLUTION NO. 12-
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING INSTALLATION OF
“PERMIT PARKING ONLY” ON FRANCE AVENUE
TRAFFIC STUDY NO. 634
WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota has been requested, has studied, and
has determined that the following traffic controls meet the requirements of the City’s policy for
installation of parking restrictions.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis
Park, Minnesota, that the Director of Public Works is hereby authorized to install the following
controls:
1. “Permit Parking Only” on both sides of France Avenue, from 3328 France Avenue to W. 34th
Street.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that parking shall not be permitted in the area restricted
by permit parking unless the vehicle prominently displays a City issued parking permit.
Emergency vehicles, governmental vehicles, and commercial vehicles parked at curbside while
work is conducted are exempt from the permit parking restrictions.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council July 16, 2012
City Manager
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Traffic Study No. 634: Authorize Permit Parking on France Avenue
Proposed “Permit Parking Only”
Existing “Permit Parking Only”
Existing “No Parking Anytime”
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4t)
Subject: TS 634: Permit Parking Restrictions on France Ave from 3328 France Ave to W. 34th St Page 4
Meeting Date: July 16, 2012
Agenda Item #: 4u
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Special Meeting Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Special Session Other:
TITLE:
Southwest Twin Cities Yellow Ribbon Coalition
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to Adopt Resolution in support of The Southwest Twin Cities Yellow Ribbon Coalition.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Is the Council interested in participating with other cities in the Southwest Twin Cities Yellow
Ribbon Coalition?
BACKGROUND:
Beyond the Yellow Ribbon is a statewide, comprehensive program that creates awareness for the
purpose of connecting Servicemembers and their families with community support, training,
services and resources. They do this by:
1. Creating awareness through the Yellow Ribbon Community Campaign and synchronizing
sustainable community support networks.
2. Connecting and coordinating organizations, agencies and companies to provide resources and
support to Servicemembers and their families.
3. Delivering a series of formal Yellow Ribbon Training events to Servicemembers and their
families before, during and after deployment.
4. Providing an opportunity for Minnesotans to support Servicemembers and their families.
Recently, community members from the cities of Edina, Excelsior, Hopkins, Minnetonka, St.
Louis Park and Wayzata have expressed interest in joining together to form the Southwest Twin
Cities Yellow Ribbon Coalition. This group of community members will work together to meet
the requirements of the Beyond the Yellow Ribbon program.
On April 18, 2012, there was an informational meeting attended by community members and
representatives from many of the interested cities. Since that meeting, the cities of Edina,
Minnetonka, and Hopkins have passed resolutions in support of the Southwest Twin Cities
Yellow Ribbon Coalition. By passing this resolution the City would show its support for the
mission of the Southwest Twin Cities Yellow Ribbon Coalition.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
None at this time.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
“St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged community.”
Attachments: Yellow Ribbon Recognition Program Information
Resolution
Prepared by: Ray French, Administrative Services Intern
Reviewed by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4u)
Subject: Southwest Twin Cities Yellow Ribbon Coalition Page 2
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4u) Page 3
Title: Southwest Twin Cities Yellow Ribbon Coalition
RESOLUTION NO. 12-____
RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF THE SOUTHWEST
TWIN CITIES YELLOW RIBBON COALITION
WHEREAS, Beyond the Yellow Ribbon is a statewide program started by the Minnesota
National Guard to establish, sustain and create awareness of a comprehensive support network
that connects and coordinates agencies, organizations and resources to meet the needs of service
members, military families and employers in Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, community members from the cities of Edina, Excelsior, Hopkins,
Minnetonka, St. Louis Park and Wayzata have expressed interest and intent to join together to
form the Southwest Twin Cities Yellow Ribbon Coalition; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park believes in the importance of
supporting all of the city’s residents, including service members and their families; and
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of St.
Louis Park applauds the role of St. Louis Park community members and organizations in
participating in the Southwest Twin Cities Yellow Ribbon Coalition, and pledges its support in
helping the Coalition to connect volunteers and resources in order to meet its goal of creating a
network for service members and their families.
Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council July 16, 2012
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Meeting Date: July 16, 2012
Agenda Item #: 4v
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Special Meeting Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Special Session Other:
TITLE:
Outstanding Citizen Award Resolution
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to adopt Resolution presenting Bob Ramsey, Ann Thomas and Todd Brewer with a St.
Louis Park Outstanding Citizen Award.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
BACKGROUND:
On October 3, 2011 the City Council approved the Outstanding Citizen Award program with the
following direction:
• The individual may be nominated by anyone.
• Nominations may be made anytime throughout the year.
• Council selects a Task Force of three current board or commission members to review
nominations and make recommendations to Council.
• Nomination information will be on our website.
Task Force members, Marjorie Douville, Fire Commission; Jim Gainsley, BOZA; and Justin
Kaufman, Housing Authority; recommend the three nominees as Outstanding Citizens.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
This recognition reinforces our City Vision area that St. Louis Park is committed to being a
connected and engaged community.
Attachments: Resolution
Prepared by: Bridget Gothberg, Organizational Development Coordinator
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4v) Page 2
Title: Outstanding Citizen Award Resolution
RESOLUTION NO. 12-___
RESOLUTION OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
PRESENTING
BOB RAMSEY, ANN THOMAS and TODD BREWER
WITH THE OUTSTANDING CITIZEN AWARD
WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park believes it is important to recognize certain
individuals for extraordinary accomplishments and contributions to the St. Louis Park
community;
WHEREAS, Bob Ramsey, Ann Thomas, and Todd Brewer have worked diligently and
dedicated their time for the betterment of our community;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of St. Louis
Park, Minnesota, by this Resolution and public record, would like to recognize and honor Bob
Ramsey, Ann Thomas, and Todd Brewer for their outstanding accomplishments and
contributions by awarding each of them with the St. Louis Park Outstanding Citizen Award.
Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council July 16, 2012
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Meeting Date: July 16, 2012
Agenda Item #: 4w
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Imposing Civil Penalties for Liquor License Violations
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to Adopt the following Resolutions Imposing Civil Penalties for Liquor License
Violations according to the recommendation of the City Manager:
• Resolution imposing civil penalty for liquor license violation on May 18, 2012, at El
Patron Mexican Cuisine, 8140 Hwy. 7.
• Resolution imposing civil penalty for liquor license violation on May 18, 2012, at Wok
in the Park, 3005 Utah Ave. So.
• Resolution imposing civil penalty for liquor license violation on May 30, 2012, at Grand
City Buffet, Inc., 8912 Hwy 7.
• Resolution imposing civil penalty for liquor license violation on May 30, 2012, at Pei
Wei Asian Diner, 5330 Cedar Lake Rd., Suite 600.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Does the City Council concur with the decision of the City Manager to impose penalties for
liquor license violations occurring in May, 2012, at four establishments in St. Louis Park? If the
City Council should disagree with the City Manager’s recommendation, a hearing would need to
be scheduled for the Licensee to appear before the City Council for further consideration.
BACKGROUND:
Liquor compliance checks were conducted by the St. Louis Park Police Department in May,
2012. Under the direction of police officers, an underage buyer attempted to purchase alcoholic
beverages at each of the 53 licensed establishments throughout the city. Five of the licensed
establishments failed the compliance check. Citations were issued in each case and forwarded to
Hennepin County District Court for consideration of criminal penalties.
The City is responsible for imposing civil penalties. Minnesota Statutes 340A.415 limits civil
penalty fees of up to $2,000 for each violation. Ordinance No. 2329-07 adopted May 7, 2007
states that the presumptive civil penalties for the violations of selling alcohol to an underage
person are as follows:
1st Violation 2nd Violation
within 3 yrs
3rd Violation
Within 3 yrs
4th Violation
Within 3 yrs
$2,000 $2,000 and
1 day suspension
$2,000 and
3 day suspension Revocation
Administrative Process
Liquor license violators were give three options:
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4w) Page 2
Subject: Imposing Civil Penalties for Liquor License Violations
1. Acceptance of the violation and payment of the penalty. If the license holder agreed
to the Stipulation of Facts, they could sign the form, acknowledging their acceptance of
the violation and agreeing to pay the administrative penalty of $2,000. With this, the
license holder waived the right to any further appeal with the City Council.
2. Administrative hearing with the City Manager. The license holder could appear at an
administrative hearing before the City Manager, sign the Stipulation of Facts form and
pay the administrative penalty of $2,000. With this, the license holder waived the right to
any further appeal with the City Council.
3. City Council Hearing. If the license holder did not agree with the Stipulation of Facts,
they could appeal directly to the City Council and schedule an appearance at a public
meeting of the City Council.
El Patron Mexican Cuisine and Wok in the Park chose Option 1 by signing the Stipulation of
Facts form and paying the administrative penalty.
Administrative Hearings were held on June 28, 2012, for Grand City Buffet, Pei Wei Asian
Diner, and Best of India. At those hearings, the City Manager, City Clerk, and Lieutenant
Harcey reviewed each violation in detail and discussed preventive measures that could be taken
to ensure that future violations do not occur. Lieutenant Harcey discussed training provided by
the St. Louis Park Police Department. At the end of each hearing, a penalty fine was determined
by the City Manager. Best of India requested to meet and talk with the St. Louis Park City
Attorney. Their penalty and fine will be addressed in a report and resolution at a future City
Council meeting.
The establishments and fines set are as follows:
Establishment
Name Address Violation
Date
Number of
Violations
within 3 years
Fine/Penalty
Grand City
Buffet, Inc. 8912 Hwy. 7 5/30/12 2 $2,000 & one day
suspension
Pei Wei Asian
Diner
5330 Cedar Lake Rd,
Suite 600 5/30/12 2 $2,000 & one day
suspension
El Patron 8140 Hwy. 7 5/18/12 1 $2,000
Wok in the Park 3005 Utah Ave. So. 5/18/12 1 $2,000
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Preventing the sale of alcohol to minors by imposing penalties assures that St. Louis Park
continues to be a connected and engaged Children First Community.
Attachment: Resolutions
Prepared by: Kay Midura, Office Assistant
Reviewed by: Nancy Stroth, City Clerk
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4w) Page 3
Subject: Imposing Civil Penalties for Liquor License Violations
RESOLUTION NO. 12 -____
RESOLUTION IMPOSING CIVIL PENALTY
FOR LIQUOR LICENSE VIOLATION
OCCURRING ON MAY 30, 2012 AT
GRAND CITY BUFFET, INC.
8912 HIGHWAY 7
WHEREAS, on May 30, 2012, a liquor license violation, sale of liquor to a minor,
occurred at Grand City Buffet, 8912 Highway 7 in St. Louis Park; and
WHEREAS, the liquor license violation was the second occurrence at this establishment
within three years; and
WHEREAS, the license holder, has stipulated that the incident occurred and was a
violation of the city liquor license ordinance Sections 3-73 through 3-75; and
WHEREAS, the license holder was informed of the civil penalty process and has agreed
to accept the administrative penalty as set by the City Manager and as approved by the City
Council.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that a civil penalty of $2,000 and a one-day
liquor license suspension to occur on July 2, 2012, is hereby imposed on the license holder
pursuant to City Code Section 3-75.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council July 16, 2012
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4w) Page 4
Subject: Imposing Civil Penalties for Liquor License Violations
RESOLUTION NO. 12 -____
RESOLUTION IMPOSING CIVIL PENALTY
FOR LIQUOR LICENSE VIOLATION
OCCURRING ON MAY 30, 2012 AT
PEI WEI ASIAN DINER
5330 CEDAR LAKE ROAD, SUITE 600
WHEREAS, on May 30, 2012, a liquor license violation, sale of liquor to a minor,
occurred at Pei Wei Asian Diner, located at 5330 Cedar Lake Road, Suite 600, in St. Louis Park;
and
WHEREAS, the liquor license violation was the second occurrence at this establishment
within three years; and
WHEREAS, the license holder, has stipulated that the incident occurred and was a
violation of the city liquor license ordinance Sections 3-73 through 3-75; and
WHEREAS, the license holder was informed of the civil penalty process and has agreed
to accept the administrative penalty as set by the City Manager and as approved by the City
Council.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that a civil penalty of $2,000 and a one-day
liquor license suspension to occur on July 2, 2012, is hereby imposed on the license holder
pursuant to City Code Section 3-75.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council July 16, 2012
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4w) Page 5
Subject: Imposing Civil Penalties for Liquor License Violations
RESOLUTION NO. 12 -____
RESOLUTION IMPOSING CIVIL PENALTY
FOR LIQUOR LICENSE VIOLATION
OCCURRING ON MAY 18, 2012 AT
EL PATRON MEXICAN CUISINE
8140 HIGHWAY 7
WHEREAS, on May 18, 2012, a liquor license violation, sale of liquor to a minor,
occurred at El Patron Mexican Cuisine, 8140 Highway 7 in St. Louis Park; and
WHEREAS, the liquor license violation was the first occurrence at this establishment
within three years; and
WHEREAS, the license holder, has stipulated that the incident occurred and was a
violation of the city liquor license ordinance Sections 3-73 through 3-75; and
WHEREAS, the license holder was informed of the civil penalty process and has agreed
to accept the administrative penalty as set by the City Manager and as approved by the City
Council.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that a civil penalty of $2,000 is hereby
imposed on the license holder pursuant to City Code Section 3-75.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council July 16, 2012
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4w) Page 6
Subject: Imposing Civil Penalties for Liquor License Violations
RESOLUTION NO. 12 -____
RESOLUTION IMPOSING CIVIL PENALTY
FOR LIQUOR LICENSE VIOLATION
OCCURRING ON MAY 18, 2012 AT
WOK IN THE PARK
3005 UTAH AVE. SO.
WHEREAS, on May 18, 2012, a liquor license violation, sale of liquor to a minor,
occurred at Wok in the Park, located at 3005 Utah Ave. So. in St. Louis Park; and
WHEREAS, the liquor license violation was the first occurrence at this establishment
within three years; and
WHEREAS, the license holder, has stipulated that the incident occurred and was a
violation of the city liquor license ordinance Sections 3-73 through 3-75; and
WHEREAS, the license holder was informed of the civil penalty process and has agreed
to accept the administrative penalty as set by the City Manager and as approved by the City
Council.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that a civil penalty of $2,000 is hereby
imposed on the license holder pursuant to City Code Section 3-75.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council July 16, 2012
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Meeting Date: July 16, 2012
Agenda Item #: 4x
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Final Payment Resolution – Contract No. 118-11 with American Liberty Construction for the
City Hall Garage Roof Replacement Project No. 2009-1700
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to Adopt Resolution accepting the work and authorizing final payment in the amount of
$18,272.71 for the City Hall Garage Roof Replacement Project No. 2009-1700.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
BACKGROUND:
The earth sheltered parking garage at City Hall was constructed in 1979. After 32 years, the
original rubber membrane roof surpassed its’ life expectancy and was allowing water into the
parking garage. In order to prevent structural deterioration and water damage within the
building, the roof membrane was due for replacement. The need for this project was previously
identified and evaluation by a consulting engineer resulted in $385,000 originally being allocated
for the project budget in the City’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP).
Bids were received on July 21, 2011 for the garage roof replacement. The range of bids received
was higher than the engineer’s estimated construction cost. Accepting the low bid of $347,000
resulted in the following modified project budget:
Construction Cost $347,000
Design Consultant $ 25,000
Irrigation System $ 5,000
Contingency $ 15,000
Revised Project Budget $392,000
The City Council awarded the contract to American Liberty Construction in the amount of
$347,000. Change orders totaled $17,416.11 are as follows:
• Re-enforcement of mechanical room well $ 1,086.48
• Repairs to existing garage structure $ 5,579.55
• Added EPDM lens and drain tile $ 12,053.08
• Deduct handrail paint and galvanizing ($ 3,582.00)
• Concrete stair changes $ 2,279.00
The contractor completed the work at a total cost of $364,416.11. Attached is the final invoice in
the amount of $18,272.71 for the completion of the City Hall Garage Roof Replacement project.
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4x) Page 2
Subject: Final Payment Resolution – Contract 118-11 City Hall Garage Roof Replacement - Proj 2009-1700
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
Project Costs:
• American Liberty Construction $364,416.11
• Design Consultant $ 22,774.90
• Irrigation System $ 6,035.00
• Attorney Fees and Legal Notices $ 527.98
Total Project Costs $393,753.99
Project Budget $392,000.00
Overage $ 1,753.99
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
Attachment: Resolution
Certified Final Payment
Prepared by: Brian Hoffman, Director of Inspections
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4x) Page 3
Subject: Final Payment Resolution – Contract 118-11 City Hall Garage Roof Replacement - Proj 2009-1700
RESOLUTION NO. 12 -_____
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK FOR THE
CITY HALL GARAGE ROOF REPLACEEMENT PROJECT
CITY PROJECT 2009-1700
CONTRACT 118-11
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. Pursuant to a written contract with the City dated August 8, 2011, American Liberty
Construction has satisfactorily completed the City Hall garage roof replacement per
Contract 118-11.
2. The Director of Inspections has filed his recommendations for final acceptance of the
work.
3. The work completed under this contract is accepted and approved. The City Manager is
directed to make final payment on the contract, taking the contractor’s receipt in full.
Original Contract Price $347,000.00
Payment 1 $135,325.54
Payment 2 $151,639.31
Payment 3 $ 21,246.27
Payment 4 $ 37,932.28
Total Previous Payments $346,143.40
Final Payment $ 18,272.71
Total Project Cost $364,416.11
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by City Council July 16, 2012
___________________________________ __________________________________
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
___________________________________
City Clerk
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4x)
Subject: Final Payment Resolution – Contract 118-11 City Hall Garage Roof Replacement - Proj 2009-1700 Page 4
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4x)
Subject: Final Payment Resolution – Contract 118-11 City Hall Garage Roof Replacement - Proj 2009-1700 Page 5
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4x)
Subject: Final Payment Resolution – Contract 118-11 City Hall Garage Roof Replacement - Proj 2009-1700 Page 6
Meeting Date: July 16, 2012
Agenda Item #: 4y
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Abatement of Hazardous Building – 2915 Ottawa Avenue South
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to Adopt Resolution ordering the abatement of the hazardous building located at 2915
Ottawa Avenue South.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Does Council concur with staff’s recommendation of declaring the un-occupied property as a
hazardous building and authorize beginning the abatement process to protect the public health
and safety?
BACKGROUND:
The property owner has not occupied the home for approximately 1 ½ years. Chief Building
Official John Tilton posted the building as unsafe for occupancy and provided notice to the
owner. There have been numerous attempts to work with the owner to bring the property into
compliance.
DISCUSSION:
Evidence of hazardous exterior conditions led to the City obtaining an Administrative Search
Warrant to perform an inspection of the property and all structures. The Director of Inspections,
Chief Building Official and a Property Maintenance Inspector completed the inspection on May
23, 2012.
Attached is the June 6, 2012 notice summarizing the history and required corrective action.
Based on the Building Official’s determination, the existing building is in a hazardous condition
and uninhabitable due to deteriorating conditions. The condition of the building must be
corrected so that it meets applicable building codes and City ordinances.
The City’s goal is to have the owner complete necessary work to bring the building into
compliance with all City codes. If the property is not maintained, the only effective solution is
for the court to order the City to abate the hazards through demolition and assess costs against
the property. Attached is a Resolution directing the City Attorney to notify and serve all parties
with an interest in the property with the Demolition Order.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
If the Court approves the summary of enforcement, the City will hire a contractor to abate the
conditions to bring the property into compliance. Expected costs are estimated to be $15,000 to
$20,000 if demolition by the City is required. The City will also seek, if possible, recovery of
legal fees related to the action.
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4y) Page 2
Subject: Abatement of Hazardous Building – 2915 Ottawa Avenue South
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
Attachments: Inspection Notice Dated June 6, 2012
Resolution Ordering Abatement of Hazardous Building
Demolition Order for Removal of a Hazardous Building
Prepared by: Brian Hoffman, Director of Inspections
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4y)
Subject: Abatement of Hazardous Building – 2915 Ottawa Avenue South Page 3
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4y)
Subject: Abatement of Hazardous Building – 2915 Ottawa Avenue South Page 4
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4y)
Subject: Abatement of Hazardous Building – 2915 Ottawa Avenue South Page 5
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4y)
Subject: Abatement of Hazardous Building – 2915 Ottawa Avenue South Page 6
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4y)
Subject: Abatement of Hazardous Building – 2915 Ottawa Avenue South Page 7
RESOLUTION NO. 12-____
RESOLUTION ORDERING ABATEMENT
OF HAZARDOUS BUILDING
WHEREAS, the Chief Building Official of the City of St. Louis Park has attempted without
success to have the owner of certain property remedy the hazardous condition of an unoccupied
residence situated on the property located at 2915 Ottawa Avenue South, St. Louis Park,
Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the building on the property constitutes a
hazardous building within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes § 463.15, subd. 3; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis
Park, Minnesota:
1. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 463.16 et seq., the City hereby adopts and approves the
Demolition Order for Removal of a Hazardous Building attached hereto as Exhibit “A”.
2. The City of St. Louis Park finds that the condition of the property located at 2915 Ottawa
Avenue South, St. Louis Park, Minnesota, is a health and safety hazard and contains a
hazardous building within the meaning of Minn. Stat. § 463.15, subd. 3.
3. The City’s legal counsel, Campbell Knutson, P.A., 317 Eagandale Office Center, 1380
Corporate Center Curve, Eagan, Minnesota 55121, is directed to serve the Demolition Order
and to proceed with enforcement in accordance with Minnesota Statutes § 463.15 et seq.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council July 16, 2012
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4y)
Subject: Abatement of Hazardous Building – 2915 Ottawa Avenue South Page 8
STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
CASE TYPE: Other Civil
_____________________________________________
Court File No. ______________
IN RE:
The Matter of a Hazardous Building DEMOLITION ORDER
Located at 2915 Ottawa Avenue South, City FOR REMOVAL OF A
of St. Louis Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota HAZARDOUS BUILDING
_____________________________________________
TO: Owners and lienholders of the above real estate:
[insert all owners and lien holders of interest]
PLEASE BE ADVISED that pursuant to order of the St. Louis Park City Council and by
authority of Minnesota Statutes § 463.15 et seq., you have twenty (20) days from the date of
service of this Order upon you, to remedy the health and safety hazard and the hazardous
condition of the building situated on property at 2915 Ottawa Avenue South, City of St. Louis
Park, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, and legally described on Exhibit “A” attached.
The Building Official for the City of St. Louis Park has inspected the above referenced
property. The inspection revealed that the residence as presently situated on the property
constitutes a hazardous condition pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 463.25 and is a health, safety, and fire
hazard to the residents of the City of St. Louis Park. All personal property and fixtures shall be
removed from the building within twenty (20) days from the date of service of this Order.
If you fail to remedy the situation the City will seek permission from the District Court
for the City to do so. The City will move the District Court for summary enforcement of this
Order pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 463.19 unless you remedy the situation within said
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4y)
Subject: Abatement of Hazardous Building – 2915 Ottawa Avenue South Page 9
twenty (20) day period or unless an answer is filed within twenty (20) days of service of this
Order upon you. Upon enforcement of the Order by the City, all costs expended by the City will
be assessed against the real property and collected as other taxes as provided in Minnesota
Statutes § 463.21.
Dated: ___________________, 2012 CAMPBELL KNUTSON
Professional Association
By: __________________________________
Soren M. Mattick, #27785X
City Attorney
317 Eagandale Office Center
1380 Corporate Center Curve
Eagan, Minnesota 55121
Telephone: (651) 452-5000
1 ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The City of St. Louis Park, by and through its undersigned attorney, acknowledges that
costs, disbursements, and reasonable attorney and witness fees may be awarded to the opposing
party or parties pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 549.21, subd. 2.
Dated: __________________, 2012.
____________________________________
Soren M. Mattick, #27785X
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4y)
Subject: Abatement of Hazardous Building – 2915 Ottawa Avenue South Page 10
EXHIBIT “A”
to
DEMOLITION ORDER FOR REMOVAL
OF A HAZARDOUS BUILDING
[insert legal description]
PID: 31-029-24-34-0086
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4y)
Subject: Abatement of Hazardous Building – 2915 Ottawa Avenue South Page 11
Meeting Date: July 16, 2012
Agenda Item #: 4z
City of St. Louis Park
Human Rights Commission
Minutes – April 17, 2012
Westwood Room, City Hall
I. Call to Order
Vice Chair Johnson called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
A. Roll Call
Commissioners Present: Emily Goldstein, Brian Johnson, Joseph Glaab, Rashmi
Seneviratne and Rhoda Quick
Staff: Marney Olson, Lt. Lori Dreier and Amy Stegora-Peterson
B. Approval of Agenda
It was moved by Commissioner Goldstein, seconded by Commissioner Seneviratne, to
approve agenda as presented.
The motion passed 5-0.
C. Approval of Minutes
It was moved by Commissioner Glaab, seconded by Commissioner Goldstein, to approve
the minutes of March 20, 2012, as presented.
The motion passed 5-0.
II. Commissioner and Committee Reports
A. Individual commissioner and staff reports
Commissioner Quick noted that PACER would be providing bookmarks (500 for teens
and 1,000 for kids) for the Commission to use.
Lieutenant Dreier indicated that a bias crime had been reported that involved property
damage of a vehicle that had been “egged”. There was nothing to indicate it was done
maliciously. The HRC will follow up with a letter to the victim.
Ms. Olson indicated an anti-bullying forum was held at City Hall by a group that does
quarterly forums (Hennepin County and other groups of social workers). It was
something she just found out about. D r. Sheldon Braedon, Division of Behavioral
Institute for Children and Adolescents presented to the group. He was a principal in the
City of Minneapolis in 1993, has a PhD and is a psychologist and spoke about this issue
now getting more attention and the need to understand aggression and early intervention.
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4z) Page 2
Subject: Human Rights Commission Meeting Minutes of April 17, 2012
Ms. Olson would get his PowerPoint and the presentation had also been taped and would
be available on cable. Mr. Braedon has a free resource library and he is based out of
Roseville. He would be a good resource and could help defining bullying (intentional,
repetitive and hurtful, resulting in an imbalance of power.)
III. Recap from Council Study Session
Ms. Olson stated they presented to City Council who seemed to think they were on track.
Vice Chair Johnson believed the Council was happy with what they had been doing.
IV. Planning for 2012 Community Event – May 20th Children First Ice Cream Social
Ms. Olson noted she had a sign-up sheet for volunteers and they would be joined at the
booth by members of the Police Advisory Committee. Commissioner Quick was getting
bookmarks from PACER to distribute and they would also provide HRC brochures and
Diversity Lens brochures and magnets. She was checking to see if they could get a prize
wheel or beanbag toss as well as coloring sheets for kids.
V. Anti-Bullying Project
• Sub-committee/Task Force – finalize committee members
• HRC’s role
Ms. Olson indicated Commissioners Johnson, Quick and Seneviratne were volunteering for
the sub-committee and would meet and bring information back to the full HRC. They will
meet on May 14th at 6 PM to brainstorm and talk about the definition of bullying. The
movie Bully had the rating changed and is now PG-13. It will be showing at more theaters.
VII. New Business
There will be no May meeting.
VIII. Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 7:31 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Amy L. Stegora-Peterson
Recording Secretary
Meeting Date: July 16, 2012
Agenda Item #: 4aa
OFFICIAL MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
MAY 16, 2012 – 6:00 p.m.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MEMBERS PRESENT: Lynne Carper, Claudia Johnston-Madison,
Robert Kramer, Dennis Morris,
Richard Person (arrived 6:10 p.m.), Larry Shapiro
MEMBERS ABSENT: Carl Robertson
STAFF PRESENT: Adam Fulton, Meg McMonigal, Rick Beane, Rick Beane,
Rick Birno
1. Call to Order – Roll Call
2. Approval of Minutes of April 18, 2012
Commissioner Morris made a motion recommending approval of the minutes of April 18,
2012. Commissioner Carper seconded, and the motion passed on a vote of 5-0.
3. Public Hearings
A. Conditional Use Permit – Elie Park
Location: 35th St. W. and Wyoming Ave. S.
Applicant: City of St. Louis Park
Case No.: 12-14-CUP
Adam Fulton, Planner, presented the staff report. He said proposed changes to the park
include modifications to the gates, addition of a scoreboard and netting, and addition of a
drinking fountain. The Conditional Use Permit for fill is required for soil corrections to
improve drainage on the field which will allow the field to be more usable for residents.
Mr. Fulton discussed the haul route for the excavation and fill. It is estimated there will
be approximately 400 truck loads of imported soil brought to and from the site.
Chair Kramer opened the public hearing.
Duane Inger, 3425 Yukon Ave. S., lives adjacent to the western portion of the park. He
stated that he strongly supported the plan. He said it will be an excellent improvement
to the neighborhood. He commended Mr. Beane for his involvement with the
neighborhood regarding the plans. He said he is concerned about the impact to his
property in the overall plan and how the drainage is going to flow. He said he’s
concerned as there is an existing seasonal wetland that occupies 1/3 of his yard currently.
He stated that he has a great backyard. As he sees the flow plan it seems that everything
is generally designed to flow to the southeast. He said there is existing drainage that
already flows to the northwest. He’s curious how that is being calculated and the impact
or improvements to that specific drainage easement. He stated that he is concerned about
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4aa) Page 2
Subject: Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of May 16, 2012
how the city’s plans will impact his property and the pretty unique seasonal wetland he
has in his backyard.
Rick Beane, Parks Superintendent, said staff met on the site with the Utility
Superintendent. He said the area Mr. Enger referred to is a lowland area, a great portion
of which is City property. He commented that the Utility Dept. does plan on enhancing
and changing the storm line through the whole park. The Utility Superintendent will be
looking at the drainage and the potential for improvements. Mr. Beane said he believes
as it will be a large grass area, sheets of water won’t be coming through. The drainage
will be improved and some of the water will be pushed south to the catch basin.
Commissioner Morris asked if the ball field would be unavailable for this season’s use.
Mr. Beane responded that the ball field would not be available for this baseball season.
Mr. Beane said he’s still getting bids on the project and the schedule proposed is to begin
mid-June with seeding to begin the third week of August. The infield area will be sodded
and the outfield will be seeded. He said Rick Birno, Recreation Superintendent, and
staff have scheduled other facilities for use this summer.
Chair Kramer asked Mr. Enger if he was satisfied with the answers provided.
Mr. Enger responded that he was satisfied with the remarks made about his concerns.
Chair Kramer closed the public hearing as there was no one else present wishing to
speak.
Commissioner Morris made a motion recommending approval of the Conditional Use
Permit subject to conditions. Commissioner Shapiro seconded the motion, and the
motion passed on a vote of 5-0.
4. Other Business
Commissioner Morris commented that construction of the Wooddale/36th senior assisted
apartments seems to have come to a halt.
Mr. Fulton responded that construction of the project, now named Tower Light, has not
stopped. Bricklayers are currently on site daily. Interior finishes are also currently
underway.
Commissioner Carper asked about Highway 100 construction and expectations for the
railroad bridge over Highway 100. He asked if that would come before the Planning
Commission.
Mr. Fulton said there isn’t a final determination yet on how freight rail will proceed. It
will be studied during the preliminary engineering phase of SW LRT. He said he
expected the Planning Commission would review that in some way. The City Council is
the entity that would grant municipal consent to the overall SW LRT project.
Commissioner Person asked about the lack of state bonding dollars for SW LRT.
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4aa) Page 3
Subject: Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of May 16, 2012
Mr. Fulton spoke about the overall cost of the SW LRT project. The bonding portion
which was not granted will need to come from the other funding entities at this time. He
said the project is continuing to move forward with an expectation that preliminary
engineering will begin in the near future. A project office is open and located in St.
Louis Park at Park Place West at Louisiana Ave. and Wayzata Blvd.
Commissioner Johnston-Madison stated that the Community Advisory Committee (CAC)
for SW LRT meets monthly. She is an alternate for the committee. She added that more
information can be found on the website.
5. Communications
None
6. Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 6:15 p.m. A study session followed.
STUDY SESSION
1. Lighting Ordinance
Jeff Miller, Hoisington Koegler, introduced the ordinance and the steps that led to the
draft changes of ordinance rewrites. He reviewed the outdoor recreational lighting.
There was a discussion of how public entities will come into compliance. A discussion
was held on general provisions of the ordinance.
2. Other
Commissioner Morris asked that the Planning Commission have an opportunity to
comment on the Highway 100 plans. He said he has concerns about how plans will go
forward.
Commissioner Johnston-Madison spoke about the former beehive park at Minnetonka
Blvd. which included a water fall and retaining wall with old limestone.
3. Beltline Design Guidelines update
Meg McMonigal, Planning and Zoning Administrator, noted the Guidelines are in a draft
form and are being reviewed and revised at this time. The next meeting of the Advisory
Committee was moved to June 13th and this is expected to be the last meeting for this
phase of the Beltline planning.
The group viewed the new video of the SW LRT line, produced by the Met Council.
Respectfully submitted,
Nancy Sells
Adm. Secretary
Meeting Date: July 16, 2012
Agenda Item #: 4bb
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Vendor Claims.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to accept for filing Vendor Claims for the period June 9 through July 6, 2012.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
BACKGROUND:
The Finance Department prepares this report on a monthly basis for Council’s review.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
None.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
Attachments: Vendor Claims
Prepared by: Connie Neubeck, Account Clerk
7/11/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:29:16R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
1Page -Council Check Summary
7/6/2012 -6/9/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
619.42TREE MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESA-1 OUTDOOR POWER INC
619.42
1,604.71PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYAAA-LICENSE DIVISION
1,604.71
1.93-PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH DUE TO OTHER GOVTSABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY INC
590.98GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
589.05
1,248.93GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESABM JANITORIAL SERVICES
1,248.93
2,784.00PRE-SCHOOL PROGRAMS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESABRAKADOODLE
2,784.00
450.00MOVE-UP PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESACACIA ARCHITECTS LLC
450.00
144.38-GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTSACROSS THE STREET PRODUCTIONS
2,244.38OPERATIONSTRAINING
2,100.00
1,880.00WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESACZ LABORATORIES INC
1,880.00
877.00HUMAN RESOURCES RECRUITMENTAD STRATEGIES
877.00
534.00WATER UTILITY G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDIAE2S
534.00
5.20-GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTSAIRGAS NORTH CENTRAL
170.48OPERATIONSOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
165.28
12,750.00ESCROWSGENERALAKARE COMPANIES LLC
12,750.00
2,989.35-GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS BAL S RETAINED PERCENTAGEALBERS MECHANICAL SERVICES INC
59,787.00GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES
56,797.65
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4bb)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 2
7/11/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:29:16R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
2Page -Council Check Summary
7/6/2012 -6/9/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
225.00MOVE-UP PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESALBERTSSON HANSEN ARCHITECTURE
225.00
54.31-GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTSALL TRAFFIC SOLUTIONS
844.31POLICE G & A POLICE EQUIPMENT
790.00
103.48GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET CLEARING ACCOUNTAMAN, DARLA
103.48
78.85POLICE G & A TELEPHONEAMERICAN MESSAGING
78.85
172.50PUBLIC WORKS G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSAMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOC
172.50PUBLIC WORKS G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
172.50ENGINEERING G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
172.50ENGINEERING G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
345.00PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
172.50WATER UTILITY G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
1,207.50
210.87PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYAMERICAN TIRE DISTRIBUTORS
210.87
88.68GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE OPERATIONAL SUPPLIESAMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SER
137.56PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
87.12PARK MAINTENANCE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
197.33ENTERPRISE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
148.23VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
61.82WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
61.82SEWER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
10.30STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
792.86
11.78-IT G & A BANK CHARGES/CREDIT CD FEESANCHOR PAPER CO
1,183.29SUPPORT SERVICES G&A OFFICE SUPPLIES
1,171.51
543.91FABRICATIONOTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESANDERSEN INC, EARL
543.91
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4bb)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 3
7/11/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:29:16R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
3Page -Council Check Summary
7/6/2012 -6/9/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
856.79WATER UTILITY G&A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTATANDERSON, SCOTT
856.79
488.63PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESAPACHE GROUP OF MINNESOTA
537.88BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
1,026.51
785.68GENERAL CUSTODIAL DUTIES OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESARAMARK UNIFORM CORP ACCTS
111.22ENTERPRISE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
896.90
131.96BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESARMCOM DISTRIBUTING CO
545.82PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES
677.78
7,616.53GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDIART PARTNERS GROUP
7,616.53
35.11E-911 PROGRAM TELEPHONEAT&T
35.11
154.80TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENTAT&T MOBILITY
154.80
4.39-GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTSATOMIC RECYCLING
68.23CLEANING/DEBRIS REMOVAL CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE
4.39-PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH DUE TO OTHER GOVTS
68.22VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE
4.39-SEWER UTILITY BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTS
68.22SEWER UTILITY G&A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE
191.50
171.00GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEAUTO ELECTRIC OF BLOOMINGTON I
171.00
9,673.43WATER UTILITY G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDIAUTOMATIC SYSTEMS INC
9,673.43
.80-PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH DUE TO OTHER GOVTSAUTOMOBILE SERVICE
132.38GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
131.58
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4bb)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 4
7/11/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:29:16R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
4Page -Council Check Summary
7/6/2012 -6/9/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
1,295.21BEAUTIFICATION / FLOWERS LANDSCAPING MATERIALSBACHMANS
1,295.21
17,314.00PE SURVEYS ENGINEERING SERVICESBADGER STATE INSPECTION LLC
4,600.00PE PLANS/SPECS ENGINEERING SERVICES
21,914.00
68.88ERUTRAININGBAHR, KURT
68.88
1,404.00HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESBARNA, GUZY & STEFFEN LTD
1,404.00
68.37ERUTRAININGBARNES, PAUL
68.37
103.13-PARK IMPROVE BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTSBARTLEY SALES CO
1,603.13PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
1,500.00
2,212.11ROUTINE MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESBARTON SAND & GRAVEL CO
2,212.11
150.00HOLIDAY PROGRAMS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESBEALKE INDUSTRIES, ROBERT
150.00
4,478.22ARENA MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESBECKER ARENA PRODUCTS
4,929.29PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES
9,407.51
1,217.00DARE PROGRAM OPERATIONAL SUPPLIESBEEKS PIZZA
1,217.00
4,538.00REILLY BUDGET EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEBERGERSON CASWELL INC
4,538.00
163.73ORGANIZED REC G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CARBIRNO, RICK
163.73
53.44NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESBLACKSTONE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN
53.44
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4bb)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 5
7/11/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:29:16R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
5Page -Council Check Summary
7/6/2012 -6/9/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
5,744.33REILLY BUDGET OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESBLOOMINGTON, CITY OF
5,744.33
363.13POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIESBOUND TREE MEDICAL, LLC
52.85POLICE G & A POSTAGE
415.98
607.44OPERATIONSGENERAL SUPPLIESBRADCO SERVICES INC
607.44
2,333.00GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURESBRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION
2,333.00
2,500.00ESCROWSDEMO / BROOKSIDE TRAFFICBRENNER, ANDREW
2,500.00
252.00INSPECTIONS G & A BUILDINGBRENTWOOD BUILDERS INC
252.00
2.06-PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH DUE TO OTHER GOVTSBRIN NORTHWESTERN GLASS CO
276.07REC CENTER BUILDING CONCESSION SUPPLIES
274.01
38.00ENGINEERING G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSBRINK, SCOTT
38.00
3,005.37ROUTINE MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESBROCK WHITE CO LLC
631.48PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
3,636.85
86.95-GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS BAL S RETAINED PERCENTAGEBROTHERS FIRE PROTECTION
1,738.95GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES
1,652.00
108.29PATCHING-PERMANENT OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESBRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC
1,044.57ALLEY MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
1,152.86
8.25-PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH DUE TO OTHER GOVTSC&E AUTO UPHOLSTERY
128.25GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
120.00
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4bb)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 6
7/11/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:29:16R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
6Page -Council Check Summary
7/6/2012 -6/9/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
741.00OPERATIONSRADIO COMMUNICATIONSCALHOUN TOWERS APTS
741.00
8.22-PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH DUE TO OTHER GOVTSCALIFORNIA CONTRACTORS SUPPLIE
127.82VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES
119.60
81.31TREE DISEASE PRIVATE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESCAMDEN INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY
81.31
6,370.10ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL SERVICESCAMPBELL KNUTSON PROF ASSOC
45.00ENGINEERING G & A LEGAL SERVICES
135.00FRANCHISE ADMINISTRATION LEGAL SERVICES
45.00GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES
1,073.25STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
112.50WATER UTILITY G&A LEGAL SERVICES
67.50SEWER UTILITY G&A LEGAL SERVICES
7,848.35
142.62WATER UTILITY G&A LICENSESCANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY
142.62
162.50GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESCARLSON, TYRONE
162.50
704.30IT G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICECARTRIDGE CARE
957.60DESKTOP SUPPORT/SERVICES EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
1,661.90
300.91TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENTCDW GOVERNMENT INC
300.91
4,689.75DISCOUNT LOAN PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESCENTER ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT
5,251.78MOVE-UP PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
9,941.53
265.02FACILITY OPERATIONS HEATING GASCENTERPOINT ENERGY
211.39PARK MAINTENANCE G & A HEATING GAS
20.25WESTWOOD G & A HEATING GAS
38.70NATURALIST PROGRAMMER HEATING GAS
1,578.50WATER UTILITY G&A HEATING GAS
38.45REILLY G & A HEATING GAS
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4bb)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 7
7/11/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:29:16R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
7Page -Council Check Summary
7/6/2012 -6/9/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
24.28SEWER UTILITY G&A ELECTRIC SERVICE
41.02SEWER UTILITY G&A HEATING GAS
2,217.61
451.75FACILITY OPERATIONS HEATING GASCENTERPOINT ENERGY SERVICES IN
2,928.05ENTERPRISE G & A HEATING GAS
3,379.80
5,594.91PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT MAINTENAN OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESCENTRAL WOOD PRODUCTS
5,594.91
175.92IT G & A TELEPHONECENTURY LINK
39.18E-911 PROGRAM TELEPHONE
215.10
205.00ORGANIZED REC G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIESCHUX SCREEN PRINTING
138.00AQUATIC PARK BUDGET OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
343.00
368.10NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT PUBLIC LIABILITY INSURANCECIMA COMPANIES INC
368.10
33,056.43EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESCINTAS FIRST AID & SAFETY
33,056.43
263.03-GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTSCITIZENS INDEPENDENT BANK
204.70ADMINISTRATION G & A MEETING EXPENSE
16.17HUMAN RESOURCES ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
950.00HUMAN RESOURCES RECOGNITION
48.58HUMAN RESOURCES MEETING EXPENSE
400.00COMM & MARKETING G & A TRAINING
104.93NETWORK SUPPORT SERVICES TELEPHONE
157.00ASSESSING G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
38.00COMM DEV PLANNING G & A TRAINING
17.00COMM DEV PLANNING G & A MEETING EXPENSE
28.79GENERAL INFORMATION OFFICE SUPPLIES
278.78GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES
48.66POLICE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
3,217.81POLICE G & A TRAINING
1,183.12POLICE G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
396.64POLICE G & A TRAVEL/MEETINGS
93.54DARE PROGRAM OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4bb)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 8
7/11/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:29:16R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
8Page -Council Check Summary
7/6/2012 -6/9/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
9.19-COMMUNICATIONS SUPERVISORY GENERAL SUPPLIES
65.93OPERATIONSOFFICE SUPPLIES
189.00OPERATIONSGENERAL SUPPLIES
712.98OPERATIONSFIRE PREVENTION SUPPLIES
4,195.21OPERATIONSEQUIPMENT PARTS
391.24OPERATIONSTRAINING
200.00INSPECTIONS G & A TRAINING
135.50ENGINEERING G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
110.00ENGINEERING G & A TRAINING
533.09PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORY
220.86-PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH DUE TO OTHER GOVTS
342.40ORGANIZED REC G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
127.18ORGANIZED REC G & A TRAINING
61.94VOLLEYBALLGENERAL SUPPLIES
274.33KICKBALLGENERAL SUPPLIES
32.17SUMMER PLAYGROUNDS GENERAL SUPPLIES
16.20YOUTH PROGRAMS GENERAL SUPPLIES
444.70TENNISGENERAL SUPPLIES
126.54PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES
37.46PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
17.47ENVIRONMENTAL G & A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
480.00ENVIRONMENTAL G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
84.00BEAUTIFICATION / FLOWERS LANDSCAPING MATERIALS
232.42WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
809.09YOUTH PROGRAMS GENERAL SUPPLIES
1,275.03AQUATIC PARK BUDGET GENERAL SUPPLIES
65.17AQUATIC PARK BUDGET CONCESSION SUPPLIES
69.01AQUATIC PARK MAINTENANCE CONCESSION SUPPLIES
1,943.55LIFEGUARDINGGENERAL SUPPLIES
877.65POOL MONITORS GENERAL SUPPLIES
729.61CONCESSIONSCONCESSION SUPPLIES
655.00DAILY ADMISSION ADVERTISING
37.90VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A OFFICE SUPPLIES
28.85VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES
3.58-CABLE TV BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTS
107.20TV PRODUCTION GENERAL SUPPLIES
55.60OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS GENERAL SUPPLIES
215.00WATER UTILITY G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
7.50TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT
22,372.98
9.82-GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTSCLAREY'S SAFETY EQUIPMENT INC
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4bb)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 9
7/11/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:29:16R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
9Page -Council Check Summary
7/6/2012 -6/9/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
349.95OPERATIONSSMALL TOOLS
152.62OPERATIONSEQUIPMENT PARTS
492.75
16,235.99ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL SERVICESCOLICH & ASSOCIATES
16,235.99
166.95NETWORK SUPPORT SERVICES DATACOMMUNICATIONSCOMCAST
9.02BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
175.97
6,334.05SEALCOAT PREPARATION OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESCOMMERCIAL ASPHALT COMPANY
6,334.05
15,002.50EMERGENCY REPAIR GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP S
15,002.50
66.95ROUTINE MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESCONSTRUCTION MATERIALS
66.95
22,700.00PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURESCOOL AIR MECHANICAL INC
22,700.00
350.00PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESCOURT SURFACES & REPAIR
350.00
146.66NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESCOX, COLIN
146.66
8.80-GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTSCROWN MARKING INC
136.75SUPPORT SERVICES G&A OFFICE SUPPLIES
127.95
262.32-PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH DUE TO OTHER GOVTSCROWTHER, RAE
4,077.84FOOTBALLGENERAL SUPPLIES
3,815.52
68.20POLICE G & A SUBSISTENCE SUPPLIESCUB FOODS
4.17NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
72.37
3,753.47GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICECUMMINS NPOWER LLC
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4bb)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 10
7/11/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:29:16R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
10Page -Council Check Summary
7/6/2012 -6/9/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
268.93SEWER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
4,022.40
2,760.00ORGANIZED REC G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESCUNINGHAM GROUP ARCHITECTURE I
2,760.00
561.00SOFTBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESCURRAN-MOORE, KIM
561.00
87.91REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESCURRIER, ROBERT
87.91
9,631.28SSD 1 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESCUSTOM PRODUCTS & SERVICES
5,101.48SSD 2 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
3,794.04SSD 3 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
2,243.30SSD #4 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
3,173.77SSD #5 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
5,556.65SSD #6 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
29,500.52
19,143.41WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESDAKOTA SUPPLY GROUP
19,143.41
1,763.47GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SUPPLYDALCO ENTERPRISES INC
475.40REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES
2,238.87
958.80-GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS BAL S RETAINED PERCENTAGEDALE TILE COMPANY
19,176.00GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES
18,217.20
52.00SEASON PASSES PROGRAM REVENUEDAVIS, COREY
52.00
3,693.43INSPECTIONS G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTSDEPT LABOR & INDUSTRY
3,693.43
303.95ENTERPRISE G & A ADVERTISINGDEX MEDIA EAST LLC
303.95
838.31MOWINGOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESDJ ELECTRIC SERVICES INC
227.50PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4bb)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 11
7/11/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:29:16R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
11Page -Council Check Summary
7/6/2012 -6/9/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
282.25REC CENTER BUILDING BUILDING MTCE SERVICE
3,709.37PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES
7,385.00UNINSURED LOSS G&A UNINSURED LOSS
12,442.43
15,418.08GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURESDLR GROUP KKE
15,418.08
1,411.02POSTAL SERVICES POSTAGEDO-GOOD.BIZ INC
4,064.38SUPPORT SERVICES G&A POSTAGE
5,475.40
270.00ESCROWSPOINT OF SALE HOUSING PROGRAMDUKE REALTY CORPORATION
270.00
1,419.88BEAUTIFICATION / FLOWERS LANDSCAPING MATERIALSDUNDEE NURSERY
1,419.88
214.54TV PRODUCTION OFFICE EQUIPMENTDUNLAP, REG
214.54
1,710.50-GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS BAL S RETAINED PERCENTAGEDYNAMIC ELECTRIC LLC
34,210.00GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES
32,499.50
459.00SYSTEM REPAIR OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESEGAN COMPANIES INC
459.00
95.46ENTERPRISE G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAREISOLD, JASON
95.46
8,461.24AQUATIC PARK MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEELECTRIC PUMP INC
8,461.24
60.00PUBLIC WORKS G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIESELLINGSON, JUDY
60.00
423.45OPERATIONSEMERGENCY PREPAREDNESSEMBEDDED SYSTEMS INC
423.45
778.27PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYEMERGENCY APPARATUS MTNCE
50.06-PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH DUE TO OTHER GOVTS
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4bb)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 12
7/11/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:29:16R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
12Page -Council Check Summary
7/6/2012 -6/9/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
728.21
3,333.37PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYEMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOG
3,333.37
625.00ADMINISTRATION G & A TRAININGEMPLOYEE STRATEGIES INC
625.00
50.00DESKTOP SUPPORT/SERVICES EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEENCORE BROKERS
50.00
88.63REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESENEBO, EDWIN & DIANE
88.63
76.78WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERSENTITLE
76.78
333.45PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESEPIC SECURITY PROFESSIONALS IN
333.45
2,941.00NETWORK SUPPORT SERVICES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESESP SYSTEMS PROFESSIONALS INC
2,941.00
2,211.24STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESESS BROTHERS & SONS INC
5,413.22STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
7,624.46
35,740.14SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS RECYCLING SERVICEEUREKA RECYCLING
35,740.14
497.43WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERSEXECUTIVE TITLE
497.43
1,239.16PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYFACTORY MOTOR PARTS CO
1,239.16
845.07INSTALLATIONOTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESFASTENAL COMPANY
845.07
51.46HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL SUPPLIESFEDEX
51.46
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4bb)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 13
7/11/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:29:16R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
13Page -Council Check Summary
7/6/2012 -6/9/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
165.39REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESFELLER, MEG & BILL
165.39
108.00WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT PARTSFERGUSON WATERWORKS
108.00
186.17ICE RESURFACER MOTOR FUELSFERRELLGAS
186.17
63.78ERUTRAININGFISHER, JON
63.78
2,030.63PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESFLAGSHIP RECREATION
2,030.63
125.91ERUTRAININGFLAHERTY, BRIAN
125.91
176.71FACILITIES MCTE G & A PERA - COORDINATEDFLIKEID, TERRY
176.71
89.50INSPECTIONS G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESFLOYD TOTAL SECURITY
89.50
305.47PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYFORCE AMERICA INC
305.47
556.61POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIESFOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT ADMIN
556.61
147.07-GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS BAL S RETAINED PERCENTAGEFRANSEN DECORATING INC
2,941.50GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES
2,794.43
6,031.86-GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS BAL S RETAINED PERCENTAGEFRATTALONE COMPANIES INC
120,636.88GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES
114,605.02
83.56REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESFREDENBURG, DAVID
83.56
10,000.00NEIGHBORHOOD PUBLIC ART OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESFRIENDS OF THE ARTS
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4bb)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 14
7/11/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:29:16R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
14Page -Council Check Summary
7/6/2012 -6/9/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
10,000.00
200.00GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESFROEMEL, GLEN
200.00
14.75COMM DEV PLANNING G & A MEETING EXPENSEFULTON, ADAM
149.30COMM DEV PLANNING G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR
164.05
75.69-REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESGANZ, ERIC
504.62PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
428.93
178.44ERUTRAININGGARLAND, MIKAEL
178.44
16,470.69ARENA MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEGARTNER REFRIG & MFG INC
16,470.69
106.00INSPECTIONS G & A PLUMBINGGENE'S WATER & SEWER INC
106.00
459.00SOFTBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESGHIZONI, DAVE
459.00
200.00OPERATIONSFIRE PREVENTION SUPPLIESGILCHRIST, BILL
200.00
300.00SOFTBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESGIRARD, KENNETH
300.00
2,717.68REC CENTER BUILDING MAINTENANCEGLEWWE DOORS INC
2,717.68
4,260.43EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S LONG TERM CARE INSURGLTC PREMIUM PAYMENTS
4,260.43
883.84VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A MOTOR VEHICLE LIAB INSURANCEGOLDEN VALLEY, CITY OF
883.84
5,520.00PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESGOODPOINTE TECHNOLOGY
5,520.00
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4bb)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 15
7/11/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:29:16R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
15Page -Council Check Summary
7/6/2012 -6/9/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
3,659.37PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESGOODPOINTE TECHNOLOGY INC
3,659.37
1,096.80WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICEGOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC
1,096.80
505.00FINANCE G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESGOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS AS
505.00
1,383.98PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYGRAFIX SHOPPE
89.03-PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH DUE TO OTHER GOVTS
1,294.95
1,272.00EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A TUITIONGRAHAM, NATHAN
1,272.00
30.60GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIESGRAINGER INC, WW
126.49PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORY
5.71GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES
162.80
2,260.89SYSTEM REPAIR OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESGRANITE LEDGE ELECTRICAL CONTR
1,760.82UNINSURED LOSS G&A UNINSURED LOSS
4,021.71
250,116.32GREENSBORO HIA OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESGREENSBORO CONDOMINIUM OWNERS
250,116.32
3,925.00-GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS BAL S RETAINED PERCENTAGEGREENWORKS LANDSCAPING
78,500.00GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A LAND
74,575.00
53.53ERUPOLICE EQUIPMENTGRONSKI, PAM
108.42ERUTRAINING
161.95
74.00REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESGROSS, CHARLES
74.00
200.00ENGINEERING G & A PUBLIC WORKSGROTH SEWER & WATER
200.00
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4bb)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 16
7/11/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:29:16R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
16Page -Council Check Summary
7/6/2012 -6/9/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
451.92EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A HEALTH INSURANCEGROUP HEALTH INC - WORKSITE
451.92
27.50-GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTSGYM WORKS INC
427.50OPERATIONSGENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
400.00
4,940.80GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURESHALLBERG ENGINEERING INC
4,940.80
810.00SOFTBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESHAMILTON, MIKE
810.00
.80-PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH DUE TO OTHER GOVTSHARRIS SERVICE
337.40ARENA MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
336.60
4,083.99AQUATIC PARK BUDGET GENERAL SUPPLIESHAWKINS INC
1,698.41AQUATIC PARK BUDGET OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
1,808.17AQUATIC PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
14,416.69WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
22,007.26
2.54-GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTSHECKLER & KOCH DEFENSE INC
39.54POLICE G & A POLICE EQUIPMENT
37.00
677.96STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICEHEDBERG AGGREGATES
677.96
157.42REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESHEITZMAN, SUSAN
157.42
500.00PERFORMING ARTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESHELLO! BOOKING INC
500.00
1,975.00SOFTBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESHENDERSON, TRACY
1,975.00
1,410.00-GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS BAL S RETAINED PERCENTAGEHENKEMEYER PAINTING & FLOOR CO
28,200.00GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4bb)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 17
7/11/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:29:16R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
17Page -Council Check Summary
7/6/2012 -6/9/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
26,790.00
1,864.80POLICE G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEHENNEPIN COUNTY INFO TECH
705.76OPERATIONSRADIO COMMUNICATIONS
200.00OPERATIONSEMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
2,770.56
1,491.00OPERATIONSTRAININGHENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER
1,491.00
64.50ASSESSING G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSHENNEPIN COUNTY TAXPAYER SERVI
64.50
6,162.14POLICE G & A SUBSISTENCE SERVICEHENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
533.37PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE
3,620.45SPEC ASSMT CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
533.37WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
10,849.33
20.00OPERATIONSTRAININGHENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE
20.00
5,341.61MUNICIPAL BLDG BUILDINGS & STRUCTURESHENRICKSEN PSG
5,341.61
25.20TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENTHEWLETT-PACKARD CO
25.20
5,690.00SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICEHIGHVIEW PLUMBING INC
5,690.00
800.28ROUTINE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT PARTSHIGHWAY TECHNOLOGIES INC
800.28
240.68GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESHIRSHFIELDS
247.62SEWER UTILITY G&A BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES
488.30
196.71GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESHOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
11.20CRACK SEALING PROJECTS GENERAL SUPPLIES
102.87ROUTINE MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
300.01ROUTINE MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4bb)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 18
7/11/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:29:16R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
18Page -Council Check Summary
7/6/2012 -6/9/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
44.42GRAFFITI CONTROL OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
30.76PAINTINGOTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
139.14PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
30.93PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
86.33ENVIRONMENTAL G & A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
199.28BEAUTIFICATION / FLOWERS OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
184.75REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES
63.41WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
105.31WATER UTILITY G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
80.85STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
1,575.97
180.00YOUTH PROGRAMS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESHOPKINS-MINNETONKA RECREATION
180.00
95.46ASSESSING G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTATHOPPE, MARK
95.46
250.00VOLLEYBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESHOWES, JEFFREY
584.00SOFTBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
834.00
250.00VOLLEYBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESHOWES, JESSICA
125.00KICKBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
375.00
50.00VOLLEYBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESHOWES, KRISTINE
532.00SOFTBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
582.00
600.00IT G & A COMPUTER SERVICESHRGREEN
600.00
77.97PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESHSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS
10.61WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
47.00VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES
135.58
137.80PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYI-STATE TRUCK CENTER
137.80
1,659.20EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S UNION DUESI.U.O.E. LOCAL NO 49
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4bb)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 19
7/11/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:29:16R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
19Page -Council Check Summary
7/6/2012 -6/9/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
1,659.20
371.94-GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTSI/O SOLUTIONS INC
5,781.94HUMAN RESOURCES RECRUITMENT
5,410.00
45.00VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTATIATN
45.00
2.41-PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH DUE TO OTHER GOVTSICE SKATING INST AMERICA
122.41INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
120.00
828.84WATER UTILITY G&A POSTAGEIMPACT PROVEN SOLUTIONS
828.84SEWER UTILITY G&A POSTAGE
828.84SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS POSTAGE
828.83STORM WATER UTILITY G&A POSTAGE
3,315.35
7.64IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESINDELCO
79.78WATER UTILITY G&A BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES
528.60WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
616.02
499.07SEWER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT PARTSINFRASTRUCTURE TECH INC
499.07
417.97PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT MAINTENAN GENERAL SUPPLIESINTECTURAL INC
417.97
2,533.35IT G & A TELEPHONEINTEGRA TELECOM
2,533.35
373.96SEWER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEINTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEM OF M
373.96
1,411.05PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYINVER GROVE FORD
1,411.05
652.11ROUTINE MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESJ & F REDDY RENTS
652.11
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4bb)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 20
7/11/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:29:16R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
20Page -Council Check Summary
7/6/2012 -6/9/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
9.21GRAFFITI CONTROL OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESJERRY'S HARDWARE
44.19COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS GENERAL SUPPLIES
30.13PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
29.92IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
46.63PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
25.36AQUATIC PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
22.84VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES
3.01GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES
27.04WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT PARTS
238.33
20.63-SEWER UTILITY BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTSJM CONSULTING LTD
320.63SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
300.00
703.68IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESJOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES/LESCO
703.68
106.15COMMUNICATIONS/GV REIMBURSEABL SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTATJOHNSON, CARRIELEA
835.06EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A TUITION
941.21
50.00VOLLEYBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESJOHNSON, SUSAN
275.00KICKBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
325.00
695.00PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESJUST-RITE CONSTRUCTION INC
10,695.00PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
11,390.00
42.90POLICE G & A TRAININGKAMPA, MARK
42.90
296.80REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESKARASOV & HANNA BLOOMFIELD, RO
296.80
32.00INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESKARCHER-RAMOS, AMBER
32.00
701.38GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIESKATH FUEL OIL SERVICE
701.38
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4bb)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 21
7/11/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:29:16R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
21Page -Council Check Summary
7/6/2012 -6/9/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
553.84EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S WAGE GARNISHMENTSKELLER, JASMINE Z
553.84
2,030.00WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEKEYS WELL DRILLING CO
2,030.00
11.80SUMMER PLAYGROUNDS PROGRAM REVENUEKHABIE, WENDY
11.80
961.60TENNISOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESKIDS TEAM TENNIS LLC
961.60
650.50-GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS BAL S RETAINED PERCENTAGEKIRK ACOUSTICS INC
13,010.00GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES
12,359.50
2,500.00ESCROWSDEMO / BROOKSIDE TRAFFICKOTHRADE SEWER WATER & EXCAVAT
2,500.00
3,575.80ROUTINE MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESKRAEMER MINING & MATERIALS INC
3,575.80
60.10REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESKRAMER & BRAD KJOS, DIANE
60.10
24,712.85MUNICIPAL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDIKRECH, O'BRIEN, MUELLER & WASS
24,712.85
124.26BLDG/GROUNDS OPS & MAINT BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIESKRUGE-AIR INC
124.26
408.00SOFTBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESKUBES, JON
408.00
21.63PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESLAKES GAS CO
21.63
336.84WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT PARTSLARSCO INC
336.84
14.00HOUSING REHAB G & A MEETING EXPENSELARSEN, KATHY
59.62HOUSING REHAB G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4bb)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 22
7/11/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:29:16R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
22Page -Council Check Summary
7/6/2012 -6/9/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
73.62
1,016.33GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESLARSON, JH CO
3,417.13SYSTEM REPAIR OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
4,433.46
2,226.00EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S UNION DUESLAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES
2,226.00
122.81REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESLEAF, CYNTHIA
122.81
350.00ADMINISTRATION G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTATLEAGUE OF MN CITIES
350.00
210,988.00UNINSURED LOSS B/S PREPAID EXPENSESLEAGUE OF MN CITIES INSURANCE
41,914.13UNINSURED LOSS G&A UNINSURED LOSS
252,902.13
1,000.00ESCROWSPMC ESCROWLEON & GERARDO CRESTO, LUCIA
1,000.00
728.00HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESLEXIS NEXIS OCC HEALTH SOLUTIO
728.00
87.66-CAPITAL REPLACEMENT B/S DUE TO OTHER GOVTSLIGHTING HOUSE USA INC
1,362.66MUNICIPAL BLDG BUILDING MTCE SERVICE
1,275.00
22,770.00GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURESLINDSTROM ENVIRONMENTAL INC
22,770.00
90.00PARK PAVILIONS REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTSLIVON, ELI
90.00
234.90FACILITIES MCTE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIESLOEFFLER SHOES
919.70PARK MAINTENANCE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
679.75REC CENTER BUILDING OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
189.95VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
195.95WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
259.90SEWER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
295.90STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4bb)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 23
7/11/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:29:16R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
23Page -Council Check Summary
7/6/2012 -6/9/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
2,776.05
43,062.00APPLICATION SUPPORT/SERVICE COMPUTER SERVICESLOGIS
153.56NETWORK SUPPORT SERVICES COMPUTER SERVICES
30,265.00TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT
73,480.56
72.27REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESLONG, CARRIE
72.27
1,625.91INSPECTIONS G & A ELECTRICALLOW VOLTAGE CONTRACTORS
1,625.91
97.17REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESLUGER, DAVID
97.17
73,837.00PERMANENT IMPR REV BAL SHT CURRENTM&L ANODIZING PROPERTIES LLC
73,837.00
302.40FABRICATIONOTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESM-R SIGN CO INC
302.40
160.00ASSESSING G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTATMAAO
160.00
15.00ENGINEERING G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSMAAPT
15.00
68.45INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESMACGREGOR-HANNAH, MAREN
68.45
672.85PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYMACQUEEN EQUIP CO
672.85
20.00WESTWOOD G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSMAEE
20.00
17,968.05-WATER UTILITY BALANCE SHEET RETAINED PERCENTAGEMAGNEY CONSTRUCTION INC
359,361.00CONSTRUCTION PAYMENTS IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
341,392.95
573.60FITNESS PROGRAMS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESMALONE, DANIEL
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4bb)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 24
7/11/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:29:16R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
24Page -Council Check Summary
7/6/2012 -6/9/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
573.60
34.38-WATER UTILITY BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTSMANAGED SERVICES INC
534.48WATER UTILITY G&A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE
500.10
712.50SSD 1 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESMAPLE CREST LANDSCAPE
560.19SSD 2 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
396.52SSD 3 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
484.91SSD #4 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
149.63SSD #5 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
74.81SSD #6 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
2,378.56
4.13-PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH DUE TO OTHER GOVTSMARKET MECHANICAL
399.11ARENA MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
394.98
128.00SKATEBOARD PROGRAMS PROGRAM REVENUEMATT, KIMBERLY
128.00
402.23GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICEMAVO SYSTEMS
402.23
855.43NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESMCBRIDE, KRIS
855.43
276.48WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERSMCCABE, KYLE
276.48
32.13SUMMER PRE/K GENERAL SUPPLIESMCCONNELL, BECKY
32.13
35.00ADMINISTRATION G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSMCFOA
35.00
13.75COMM DEV PLANNING G & A MEETING EXPENSEMCMONIGAL, MEG
13.75
181.65PUBLIC WORKS G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIESMENARDS
136.78ROUTINE MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
31.36PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4bb)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 25
7/11/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:29:16R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
25Page -Council Check Summary
7/6/2012 -6/9/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
273.43TREE MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
252.86WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
47.91WESTWOOD G & A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
119.31PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
163.06WATER UTILITY G&A BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES
1,206.36
75.48PUBLIC WORKS G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CARMERKLEY, SCOTT
75.48
160.00INSPECTIONS G & A TRAININGMESH
160.00
16.57-GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTSMETRO FIRE INC
257.57OPERATIONSEQUIPMENT PARTS
241.00
9,365.40INSPECTIONS G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTSMETROPOLITAN COUNCIL
292,430.91OPERATIONSCLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE
301,796.31
9.64PUBLIC WORKS G & A OFFICE SUPPLIESMICRO CENTER
9.64
574.43REILLY BUDGET EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEMID AMERICA METER INC
574.43
1,925.64SEALCOATINGOTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESMIDSTATES EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY
1,925.64
14,323.07-PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT B/S RETAINED PERCENTAGEMIDWEST ASPHALT CORP
286,461.36CONSTRUCTION PAYMENTS IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
296.85STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
272,435.14
984.59OPERATIONSFIRE PREVENTION SUPPLIESMIDWEST BADGE & NOVELTY CO
673.31GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
1,657.90
63.94-WATER UTILITY BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTSMIDWEST TESTING LLC
2,091.63WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1,753.94WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4bb)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 26
7/11/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:29:16R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
26Page -Council Check Summary
7/6/2012 -6/9/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
3,781.63
652.92VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A SMALL TOOLSMILLERBERND, DENNIS
652.92
111.00ASSESSING G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSMINNEAPOLIS AREA ASSOC REALTOR
111.00
543.60PAWN FEES OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESMINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPT
543.60
96.00GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICEMINNEAPOLIS WINDOW SHADE CO
96.00
1,750.00STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESMINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED
1,750.00
951.67GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESMINNESOTA CONWAY
4.13-WATER UTILITY BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTS
64.13WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1,011.67
50.00REILLY BUDGET LICENSESMINNESOTA DEPT HEALTH
50.00
95.00ASSESSING G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSMINNESOTA LEGAL REGISTER
95.00
400.00PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT LANDMINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AG
400.00
45.86-PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH DUE TO OTHER GOVTSMINNESOTA PREMIER PUBLICATIONS
712.86DAILY ADMISSION ADVERTISING
667.00
175.00SUMMER PLAYGROUNDS TRAININGMINNESOTA RECREATION & PARK AS
175.00
641.25OPERATIONSOPERATIONAL SUPPLIESMINT CONDITION DETAILING
85.50GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
726.75
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4bb)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 27
7/11/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:29:16R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
27Page -Council Check Summary
7/6/2012 -6/9/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
271.46WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT PARTSMINVALCO INC
271.46
2,098.20PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESMISTER CAR WASH
2,098.20
2,340.00ERUTRAININGMN TACTICAL OFFICERS ASSOC
2,340.00
11.00SUMMER FIELDTRIPS PROGRAM REVENUEMOOT, STACY
11.00
1,635.12COMMUNICATIONS/GV REIMBURSEABL EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEMOTOROLA
1,635.12
2.00-PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH DUE TO OTHER GOVTSMOTZKO PLUMBING & HEATING CO,
181.15PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
179.15
2,541.00SOFTBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESMRPA
2,541.00
1,094.05PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYMTI DISTRIBUTING CO
1,094.05
400.00REILLY BUDGET OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESMVTL LABORATORIES
400.00
37.29ROUTINE MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESNAPA (GENUINE PARTS CO)
2,590.79PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORY
236.41GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES
22.82WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT PARTS
2,887.31
110,838.71PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYNELSON AUTO CENTER
110,838.71
728.72EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A TUITIONNELSON, MARK
728.72
1,402.50SOFTBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESNEUMANN, NEAL
1,402.50
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4bb)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 28
7/11/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:29:16R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
28Page -Council Check Summary
7/6/2012 -6/9/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
303.76ADMINISTRATION G & A TELEPHONENEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
3.32HUMAN RESOURCES TELEPHONE
552.55RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT TELEPHONE
30.01ASSESSING G & A TELEPHONE
56.15FINANCE G & A TELEPHONE
681.56EDA / HA REIMBURSEMENT TELEPHONE
852.45POLICE G & A TELEPHONE
312.97OPERATIONSTELEPHONE
3.29INSPECTIONS G & A TELEPHONE
274.04ENGINEERING G & A TELEPHONE
647.25PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A TELEPHONE
160.58PARK AND REC G&A TELEPHONE
485.51ORGANIZED REC G & A TELEPHONE
236.13PARK MAINTENANCE G & A TELEPHONE
4.15ENVIRONMENTAL G & A TELEPHONE
127.13WESTWOOD G & A TELEPHONE
62.78VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A TELEPHONE
307.89WATER UTILITY G&A TELEPHONE
123.57SEWER UTILITY G&A TELEPHONE
7.63SOLID WASTE G&A TELEPHONE
5,232.72
9,500.00POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESNORTHERN STAR JUVENILE DIVERSI
9,500.00
15.39ENGINEERING G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIESNORTHWEST LASERS & INSTRUMENTS
15.39
500.00POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESOAK KNOLL ANIMAL HOSPITAL
500.00
926.71ENGINEERING G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIESOCCUPATIONAL DEVELOPMENT CENTE
926.71
78.96ADMINISTRATION G & A OFFICE SUPPLIESOFFICE DEPOT
24.30ADMINISTRATION G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
169.73HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICE SUPPLIES
295.59SUPPORT SERVICES G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
16.47ASSESSING G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
176.62FINANCE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
83.49POLICE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4bb)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 29
7/11/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:29:16R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
29Page -Council Check Summary
7/6/2012 -6/9/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
5.30POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
62.60COP SHOP OFFICE SUPPLIES
271.02OPERATIONSOFFICE SUPPLIES
669.99INSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
320.03PUBLIC WORKS G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
640.98ORGANIZED REC G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
155.56WESTWOOD G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
4.87VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A OFFICE SUPPLIES
56.77WATER UTILITY G&A OFFICE SUPPLIES
3,032.28
3,169.23INSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESOFFICE TEAM
3,169.23
304.88PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESOLSEN CHAIN & CABLE CO INC
304.88
8.79-PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH DUE TO OTHER GOVTSOMAHA PAPER COMPANY INC
136.68PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
127.89
304.59OPERATIONSFIRE PREVENTION SUPPLIESON SITE SANITATION
7,809.23PORTABLE TOILETS/FIELD MAINT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
209.48OFF-LEASH DOG PARK OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
277.88WESTWOOD G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
106.88NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
53.44SOLID WASTE G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
8,761.50
175.95EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESOPTUM HEALTH FINANCIAL SERVICE
175.95
106.88TREE DISEASE PUBLIC CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICEOSTVIG TREE INC
106.88
287.92ROUTINE MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESPAINTERS GEAR INC
287.92
7,250.00COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESPARKTACULAR
7,250.00
64.60INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESPARR, MELISSA
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4bb)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 30
7/11/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:29:16R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
30Page -Council Check Summary
7/6/2012 -6/9/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
64.60
430.40VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIESPARTS ASSOCIATES INC
430.40
36,708.03CONSTRUCTION PAYMENTS IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDIPEARSON BROTHERS INC
36,708.03
10.31-PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH DUE TO OTHER GOVTSPERNSTEINER CREATIVE GROUP INC
160.31SPECIAL EVENTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
150.00
6,000.00ESCROWSDEMO / BROOKSIDE TRAFFICPETERS, JENNIFER
6,000.00
39.35ADMINISTRATION G & A MEETING EXPENSEPETTY CASH
26.82ADMINISTRATION G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR
8.50HUMAN RESOURCES CITE
9.95HUMAN RESOURCES MEETING EXPENSE
94.78INSPECTIONS G & A MEETING EXPENSE
19.31PUBLIC WORKS G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR
198.71
9,990.53ROUTINE MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESPHILIP'S TREE CARE INC
145.35PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
347.34BEAUTIFICATION / FLOWERS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
10,483.22
34.73ESCROWSGENERALPLESKO & ASSOCIATES INC, E J
34.73
242.10INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESPOLK, MARLA
242.10
3,241.86PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYPOMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC
156.67VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
5,054.53GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
8,453.06
362.70PARK MAINTENANCE G & A TELEPHONEPOPP.COM INC
362.70
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4bb)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 31
7/11/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:29:16R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
31Page -Council Check Summary
7/6/2012 -6/9/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
83.05-PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH DUE TO OTHER GOVTSPOURED FOUNDATIONS INC
1,291.05AQUATIC PARK MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1,208.00
36.00INSPECTIONS G & A MECHANICALPRACTICAL SYSTEMS
36.00
230.09-STORM WATER UTILITY BAL SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTSPRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC
3,576.78STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
3,346.69
2,593.85TREE DISEASE PUBLIC CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICEPRECISION LANDSCAPE & TREE
400.78AQUATIC PARK MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
2,994.63
7.43-PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH DUE TO OTHER GOVTSPRINTERS SERVICE INC
115.43ICE RESURFACER EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
108.00
220.00WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESPRIVATE UNDERGROUND
220.00
401.74AQUATIC PARK MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEPROFESSIONAL BEVERAGE SYSTEMS
401.74
79.00PUBLIC WORKS G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTATPRYOR SEMINARS, FRED
79.00
577.02VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIESPUMP & METER SERVICE
577.02
1,439.44WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICEQ3 CONTRACTING
1,171.94SEWER UTILITY G&A BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES
4,520.19SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
4,279.70STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
11,411.27
262.38ARENA MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICER & R SPECIALTIES
262.38
618.49TREE DISEASE PUBLIC CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICERAINBOW TREECARE
618.49
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4bb)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 32
7/11/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:29:16R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
32Page -Council Check Summary
7/6/2012 -6/9/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
396.51SPECIAL EVENTS POSTAGERAPID GRAPHICS & MAILING
396.51
178.65-PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH DUE TO OTHER GOVTSRECREONICS ETAL
2,777.15AQUATIC PARK BUDGET GENERAL SUPPLIES
90.39-PARK IMPROVE BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTS
1,405.15PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
3,913.26
40.31POLICE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIESREGENCY OFFICE PRODUCTS LLC
40.31
31.50WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF M
31.50
225.00MOVE-UP PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESREHKAMP LARSON ARCHITECTS INC
225.00
236.33-SOLID WASTE BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTSREHRIG PACIFIC CO
3,673.88SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS OTHER
3,437.55
42.00SEASON PASSES PROGRAM REVENUEREICHERT, JOHN
42.00
90.00PARK PAVILIONS REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTSREIMER, AMY
90.00
1,368.00PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESREINDERS INC
1,368.00
22.26-PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH DUE TO OTHER GOVTSRETROFIT COMPANIES INC
346.07REC CENTER BUILDING GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE
323.81
1,979.44PRINTING/REPRO SERVICES EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICERICOH USA INC
4,500.00GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
6,479.44
408.00SOFTBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESRITCHIE, TAYLOR
408.00
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4bb)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 33
7/11/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:29:16R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
33Page -Council Check Summary
7/6/2012 -6/9/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
476.92-PARK IMPROVE BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTSRKO CONTRACTING LLC
8,971.42PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES
8,494.50
2,079.63WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESRMR SERVICES
2,079.63
49.60INSPECTIONS G & A MECHANICALRONS MECHANICAL INC
49.60
89.25REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESROSE, NANCY
89.25
785.71-PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH DUE TO OTHER GOVTSROSENBAUER MINNESOTA LLC
12,214.25GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
11,428.54
4,712.12STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICEROYAL CONCRETE PIPE INC
4,712.12
177.07-PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH DUE TO OTHER GOVTSS & S WORLDWIDE INC
2,752.63SUMMER PLAYGROUNDS GENERAL SUPPLIES
2,575.56
10,495.00EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESSAFEASSURE CONSULTANTS INC
10,495.00
176.33GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICESAFELITE FULFILLMENT INC
176.33
1,153.93OPERATIONSGENERAL SUPPLIESSAM'S CLUB
594.63ORGANIZED REC G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
109.38IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
61.95CONCESSIONSCONCESSION SUPPLIES
1,919.89
28.00INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESSANDUM, KATHERINE
28.00
150.00PERFORMING ARTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESSANSBY, SCOTT
150.00
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4bb)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 34
7/11/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:29:16R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
34Page -Council Check Summary
7/6/2012 -6/9/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
64.00INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESSAURER, MARTI
64.00
132.06HUMAN RESOURCES RECOGNITIONSCHAAKE COMPANY, AJ
132.06
418.64PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYSCHARBER & SONS INC
418.64
1,824.00GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESSCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP
1,824.00
1,875.00AQUATIC PARK MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCESCHULTZ, LEO
1,875.00
436.95WATER UTILITY G&A OTHERSEARS COMMERCIAL ONE
436.95SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER
436.96STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER
1,310.86
1,507.58SEWER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESSEH
1,507.58
30,958.39CE INSPECTION IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDISEH INC
2,028.48PE DESIGN IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
32,986.87
372.75STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDISGC HORIZON LLC
372.75
2,189.87PAINTINGOTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESSHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO
2,189.87
10.00ADMINISTRATION G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESSHRED-IT
10.00FINANCE G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
50.00POLICE G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
10.00INSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
80.00
136.66GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESSIEGEL DISPLAY PRODUCTS
136.66
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4bb)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 35
7/11/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:29:16R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
35Page -Council Check Summary
7/6/2012 -6/9/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
58.78GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIESSIGN PRODUCERS INC
58.78
102.26-PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH DUE TO OTHER GOVTSSIGNATURE MECHANICAL INC
1,404.89IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
184.89BUILDING MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1,487.52
140.54-PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH DUE TO OTHER GOVTSSIGNATURE SYSTEMS GROUP LLC
2,184.77AQUATIC PARK BUDGET GENERAL SUPPLIES
2,044.23
1,345.92EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S UNION DUESSLP ASSOC OF FIREFIGHTERS #993
1,345.92
400.00SOFTBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESSMITH, PERRY
400.00
50.00GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESSMITH, TODD & LORI
50.00
1,000.00PERFORMING ARTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESSMP PRODUCTIONS
1,000.00
3,600.00WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESSOURCE WATER SOLUTIONS LLC
3,600.00
1,729.90NETWORK SUPPORT SERVICES DATACOMMUNICATIONSSPRINT
1,729.90
5.23-FACILITIES MCTE G & A BANK CHARGES/CREDIT CD FEESSPS COMPANIES INC
279.61PLUMBING MTCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES
270.08WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
14.96WATER UTILITY G&A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE
599.72REILLY BUDGET OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
1,159.14
1,164.21ENGINEERING G & A ENGINEERING SERVICESSRF CONSULTING GROUP INC
1,601.24CE INSPECTION IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
2,765.45
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4bb)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 36
7/11/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:29:16R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
36Page -Council Check Summary
7/6/2012 -6/9/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
37,526.24PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURESST CROIX REC CO
17,570.44PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
55,096.68
1,429.99TREE DISEASE PRIVATE CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICEST CROIX TREE SERVICE INC
1,429.99
371.50-GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS BAL S RETAINED PERCENTAGEST PAUL LINOLEUM & CARPET CO
7,430.00GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES
7,058.50
91.38REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESSTANGL, MATT
91.38
188.73REC CENTER BUILDING BUILDING MTCE SERVICESTANLEY ACCESS TECH LLC
188.73
306.00SOFTBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESSTEARNS, DAVID
306.00
600.00-GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS BAL S RETAINED PERCENTAGESTEENBERG-WATRUD CONSTRUCTION
12,000.00GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES
11,400.00
49.03OPERATIONSGENERAL SUPPLIESSTEMMER, LUKE
49.03
61.46-REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESSTILLMAN, MARTIN
409.72PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
348.26
340.86SEWER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT PARTSSTONEBROOKE EQUIPMENT INC
340.86
61.99SEWER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICESTRAND MFG CO
61.99
3,448.89REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIESSTRATEGIC EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY C
3,448.89
168.13-GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTSSTREICHER'S
159.96POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4bb)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 37
7/11/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:29:16R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
37Page -Council Check Summary
7/6/2012 -6/9/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
2,613.62ERUOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
2,605.45
25.98PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYSUBURBAN GM PARTS
25.98
2,922.00REILLY BUDGET GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESSUMMIT ENVIROSOLUTIONS INC
2,922.00
98.92ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL NOTICESSUN NEWSPAPERS
278.69STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A LEGAL NOTICES
944.00SOLID WASTE G&A ADVERTISING
1,321.61
7,253.94WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICESWANSON PROCESS SERVICES
7,253.94
2,800.00PERFORMING ARTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESSWENSON, STEVEN
2,800.00
.61-PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH DUE TO OTHER GOVTSTAHO SPORTSWEAR
797.70SPECIAL EVENTS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
9.41SUMMER PLAYGROUNDS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
41.58LIFEGUARDINGOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
848.08
15.80POLICE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESTARGET BANK
19.10POLICE G & A TRAINING
26.36DARE PROGRAM OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
30.32RANGETRAINING
91.58
289.19PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESTARPS INC
289.19
3,958.60-GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS BAL S RETAINED PERCENTAGETECTA AMERICAN STOCK ROOFING L
79,174.30GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES
75,215.70
7.74ADMINISTRATION G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESTELELANGUAGE INC
7.74
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4bb)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 38
7/11/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:29:16R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
38Page -Council Check Summary
7/6/2012 -6/9/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
39.81REC CENTER BUILDING EQUIPMENT PARTSTENNANT SALES AND SERVICE CO.
39.81
104.06BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICETERMINIX INT
104.06
42.66ADMINISTRATION G & A LONG TERM DISABILITYTHE HARTFORD - PRIORITY ACCOUN
51.90HUMAN RESOURCES LONG TERM DISABILITY
15.51COMM & MARKETING G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY
39.20IT G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY
33.10ASSESSING G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY
64.49FINANCE G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY
106.69COMM DEV G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY
113.80POLICE G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY
72.21OPERATIONSLONG TERM DISABILITY
54.34INSPECTIONS G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY
40.99PUBLIC WORKS G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY
70.77ENGINEERING G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY
19.25PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY
65.00ORGANIZED REC G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY
19.25PARK MAINTENANCE G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY
16.05ENVIRONMENTAL G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY
16.05WESTWOOD G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY
12.99REC CENTER/AQUATIC PARK SAL LONG TERM DISABILITY
16.51VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A LONG TERM DISABILITY
15.60HOUSING REHAB G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY
19.25WATER UTILITY G&A LONG TERM DISABILITY
1,939.90EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A LONG TERM DISABILITY
2,845.51
50.00INSPECTIONS G & A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCETHIES, RICK
50.00
32.30INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESTHOMPSON, HOLLY
32.30
102.00SOFTBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESTHOMPSON, JAMES
102.00
665.51ADMINISTRATION G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESTIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL
665.51
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4bb)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 39
7/11/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:29:16R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
39Page -Council Check Summary
7/6/2012 -6/9/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
8,379.00PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYTITAN MACHINERY
8,379.00
2,818.98WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESTKDA
1,877.73WATER UTILITY G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
4,696.71
551.42PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYTOWMASTER
35.47-PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH DUE TO OTHER GOVTS
515.95
204.00SOFTBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESTRAUTMANN, JOHN
204.00
313.57-WATER UTILITY BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTSTREMCO WEATHERPROOFING TECH IN
4,874.57WATER UTILITY G&A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE
4,561.00
118.91PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYTRI STATE BOBCAT
118.91
41.87PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYTRUCK UTILITIES MFG CO
41.87
281.40PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYTURFWERKS
281.40
94.05PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESTWIN CITY HARDWARE
464.06PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
558.11
90.00ADMINISTRATION G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTATTWIN WEST CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
90.00
2,599.25GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICEUHL CO INC
386.19OPERATIONSGENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1,480.41GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
5.23-CAPITAL REPLACEMENT B/S DUE TO OTHER GOVTS
1,615.23TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT
6,075.85
14.13-GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTSULINE
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4bb)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 40
7/11/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:29:16R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
40Page -Council Check Summary
7/6/2012 -6/9/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
219.70POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
205.57
1,110.85SUPPORT SERVICES OPERATIONAL SUPPLIESUNIFORMS UNLIMITED (PD)
1,514.37SUPERVISORYOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
2,343.46PATROLOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
80.00RESERVESOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
402.98COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
5,451.66
1,000.00ESCROWSGENERALUNITED PROPERTIES
1,000.00
1,066.22STORM WATER UTILITY G&A RENTAL EQUIPMENTUNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST INC
1,066.22
300.00EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S WAGE GARNISHMENTSUNITED STATES TREASURY
300.00
480.00EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S UNITED WAYUNITED WAY OF MINNEAPOLIS AREA
480.00
462.00HUMAN RESOURCES RECRUITMENTUS HEALTH WORKS MEDICAL GROUP
462.00
191.45SEWER UTILITY G&A SMALL TOOLSUSA BLUE BOOK
465.88STORM WATER UTILITY G&A SMALL TOOLS
657.33
464.55HOLIDAY PROGRAMS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESUSA INFLATABLES & MOONWALKS PA
464.55
9.84WATER UTILITY G&A TELEPHONEUSA MOBILITY WIRELESS INC
9.84
63,630.17PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT B/S RETAINED PERCENTAGEVALLEY PAVING INC
53,930.88CONSTRUCTION PAYMENTS IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
117,561.05
558.00REILLY BUDGET BUILDING MTCE SERVICEVALLEY-RICH CO INC
6,560.81REILLY BUDGET OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
7,118.81
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4bb)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 41
7/11/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:29:16R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
41Page -Council Check Summary
7/6/2012 -6/9/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
174.27ENVIRONMENTAL G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CARVAUGHAN, JIM
174.27
74.22COMMUNICATIONS/GV REIMBURSEABL TELEPHONEVERIZON WIRELESS
567.68TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT
641.90
350.00SOFTBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESVICE, GARY
350.00
154.65IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESVIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY
154.65
5,235.63SEWER UTILITY BALANCE SHEET RETAINED PERCENTAGEVISU-SEWER INC
5,235.63
54.11PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYWALSER CHRYSLER JEEP
54.11
150.00PARK PAVILIONS PROGRAM REVENUEWARHOLM, KRIS
150.00
2,957.04SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESWASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN
5,131.91SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS MOTOR FUELS
60,334.80SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE
25,220.88SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS YARD WASTE SERVICE
34,445.36SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE
18,813.47SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL YARD WASTE SERVICE
146,903.46
555.50PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT MAINTENAN OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESWASTE TECHNOLOGY INC
555.50
840.89WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICEWATER CONSERVATION SERVICE INC
840.89
8,398.89CONCESSIONSCONCESSION SUPPLIESWATSON CO INC
8,398.89
1,286.98ARENA MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESWAVS INC
3,401.83AQUATIC PARK MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4bb)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 42
7/11/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:29:16R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
42Page -Council Check Summary
7/6/2012 -6/9/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
4,688.81
53.98-WATER UTILITY BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTSWEBER ELECTRIC
131.00WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
1,895.14WATER UTILITY G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
643.75STORM WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
2,615.91
126.00SUPPORT SERVICES OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESWEST PAYMENT CENTER
126.00
127.47NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESWESTWOOD HILLS NEIGHBORHOOD AS
127.47
334.81ELECTRICAL SYSTEM MTCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICEWOLNEY ELECTRIC LLC
1,754.43PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
2,089.24
256.50GOOSE MANAGEMENT OFFICE SUPPLIESWRAP CITY GRAPHICS
167.50BUILDING MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
342.83AQUATIC PARK MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
766.83
13,211.45FACILITY OPERATIONS ELECTRIC SERVICEXCEL ENERGY
22.35OPERATIONSELECTRIC SERVICE
21,948.56PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE
4,506.82PARK MAINTENANCE G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE
19.51BRICK HOUSE (1324)ELECTRIC SERVICE
38.17WW RENTAL HOUSE (1322)ELECTRIC SERVICE
468.94WESTWOOD G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE
13.31-GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES
23,746.88WATER UTILITY G&A ELECTRIC SERVICE
862.20REILLY BUDGET ELECTRIC SERVICE
2,623.04SEWER UTILITY G&A ELECTRIC SERVICE
3,096.52STORM WATER UTILITY G&A ELECTRIC SERVICE
22.43OPERATIONSELECTRIC SERVICE
70,553.56
30,527.93PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYYOCUM OIL CO INC
30,527.93
172.05ROUTINE MAINTENANCE OPERATIONAL SUPPLIESZACKS INC
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4bb)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 43
7/11/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:29:16R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
43Page -Council Check Summary
7/6/2012 -6/9/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
128.40PARK MAINTENANCE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
425.88REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES
65.58GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES
275.79SEWER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
1,067.70
4.62WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
714.14BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
77.91VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES
796.67
536.57PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESZEP MFG
78.56PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
344.44GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES
113.99BLDG/GROUNDS OPS & MAINT BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES
78.56SEWER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES
1,152.12
77.70SUMMER PLAYGROUNDS MILEAGE-PERSONAL CARZHU, YAN
77.70
164.77POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIESZIP PRINTING
214.55PERFORMING ARTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
28.63GOOSE MANAGEMENT OFFICE SUPPLIES
320.65REILLY BUDGET OFFICE SUPPLIES
728.60
Report Totals 3,568,923.32
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 4bb)
Subject: Vendor Claims Page 44
Meeting Date: July 16, 2012
Agenda Item #: 6a
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Off-Sale Liquor License – Liquor Boy, Inc.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Mayor to close public hearing. Motion to approve an off-sale intoxicating liquor license to
Liquor Boy, Inc. located at 5620 Park Place Boulevard with the license term through March 1,
2012.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Does the Council wish to approve the off-sale intoxicating liquor license to Liquor Boy, Inc?
BACKGROUND:
The City received an application from Liquor Boy, Inc. for an off-sale intoxicating liquor license
operating at 5620 Park Place Boulevard. The premises to be licensed consists of approximately
9,000 square feet in the Park Place Plaza Shopping Center. The new liquor establishment will be
located in a portion of the space of Office Max which is downsizing.
John Wolf is the sole officer and owner and plans to open in September or October. Mr. Wolf
currently owns and operates Chicago Lake Liquors located at 825 East Lake Street in
Minneapolis and is regarded as the largest alcohol retailer/retail establishment in the State of
Minnesota.
Liquor Boy will be operated by approximately 10 employees and open for business on a tentative
schedule of Monday - Thursday from 9 a.m. to 9 p.m., Friday and Saturday from 9 a.m. to 10
p.m. (State law does not allow liquor stores to be open on Sundays or before 8:00 a.m. or after
10:00 p.m. Monday -Saturday.)
The Police Department has run a full background investigation and has found no reason to deny
the new ownership based on the investigation. The application and Police report are on file in
the Office of the City Clerk should Council members wish to review the information prior to the
public hearing. The required notice of the public hearing was published July 5, 2012. The city
currently has 14 intoxicating off-sale licensees.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
Fees for this applicant include $500 for a new license investigation fee and a $380 off-sale
license fee (pro-rated).
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
Attachments: None
Prepared by: Nancy Stroth, City Clerk
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
Meeting Date: July 16, 2012
Agenda Item #: 8a
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Commence Eminent Domain Action for Public Purposes - Highway 7 / Louisiana Avenue
Interchange Project
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to Adopt Resolution authorizing Condemnation of Land for Public Purposes - Highway 7
/ Louisiana Avenue Interchange Project – Project No. 2012-0100.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
In order to insure this project can remain on schedule, does the Council wish to authorize the use
of eminent domain to insure the necessary land can be assembled in a timely way?
BACKGROUND:
History
The City’s Capital Improvement Program (C.I.P.) identifies the Highway 7/Louisiana Avenue
intersection as a priority improvement project. The proposed project, which provides for the
construction of a grade-separated interchange at Louisiana Avenue and Highway 7, also includes
pedestrian and bicycle friendly improvements along with re-configuration of the frontage roads
in order to improve access, safety, and traffic flow for both the Highway 7 corridor and
Louisiana Avenue. This proposed improvement is essential in meeting long term transportation
and safety needs of both Mn/DOT and the City as well as quality of life and redevelopment
needs in this area of the city.
Project Purpose and Need
The primary purpose of the Highway 7/Louisiana Avenue Interchange Project is to address
deteriorating safety and operational conditions at the Highway 7 and Louisiana Avenue
intersection. These deficient conditions are resulting in numerous crashes and causing high
levels of congestion. In conjunction with the proposed project, there are also opportunities to
improve pedestrian and bicycle movements across Highway 7 that are anticipated to increase
with the construction and operation of a future LRT Station along Louisiana Avenue. In
addition, the transportation improvements will help foster economic development in the area.
As listed above, the need for the project is centered on the following:
• Improve Vehicle Safety
• Maintain Mobility / Reduce Congestion / Reduce Vehicle Delays
In addition, the following were identified as opportunities to consider in the development of this
project:
• Improve Pedestrian/Bicycle Movements
• Environmental Improvements (reduce greenhouse gases / air pollution, stormwater
quality improvements, site clean-up activities)
• Foster Economic Development
• Improve Response Time for Emergency Vehicles
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 8a) Page 2
Subject: Commence Eminent Domain Action for Public Purposes - Hwy 7 / Louisiana Ave Interchange Proj
Detailed information and data supporting the Project Purpose and Need is documented in the
Project’s Environmental Assessment which can be viewed here at the project’s website:
http://www.sehinc.com/files/online/LouisianaFINALEA.pdf
Right of Way Acquisition Activities
Construction of the new interchange will impact 17 land parcels (properties) adjacent to the
project area. Ten of the parcels are owned by the City and the remaining 7 parcels are privately
owned. The city will need to acquire (purchase) easements from the 7 privately owned parcels.
Two types of easements, permanent and temporary, will need to be purchase from 6 parcels and
only a temporary easement from one parcel. Permanent easements are needed for widening of
the right of way to accommodate the new roadway infrastructure. Temporary easements are
needed only during construction of the project.
The City’s right of way consultant, Evergreen Land Services, is currently working on Pre-
Acquisition Activities which include the following:
• Property Owner Introductory Letter, Questionnaire and Acquisition Brochure
• Field Title Reviews
• Appraisal Activities
• Parcel File Preparation
• Conveyance Document Preparation
• Offer Letter Preparation
Upon completion of Pre-Acquisition Activities (anticipated by mid-July), Acquisition Activities
including offers, negotiations and condemnation will need to begin to keep the project on
schedule. At this time, the City Attorney recommends initiation of the eminent domain process
which requires Council approval of a resolution authorizing condemnation of land for public
purposes. Approval of the resolution will allow for condemnation by the quick take method in
the event that negotiations and subsequent acquisitions do not occur in a timely manner. The
intent of staff is to acquire the necessary right of way through a negotiated process. Our current
schedule will allow approximately 4 months for these negotiations.
The City Attorney participated in the preparation and review of this report.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATIONS:
Project Costs
Presented below are the estimated project costs based on current design work. All of the funding
sources are also presented below:
Current Estimated Project Costs
Construction $18,090,000
Preliminary and Final Design Engineering $ 1,818,000
Construction Engineering (estimated consultant cost) $ 1,800,000
Undergrounding Power Lines $ 600,000
Right of Way Acquisition Services (appraisals, title work, attorney fees) $ 100,000
Right of Way (Purchasing land and easements, condemnation costs) $ 2,600,000
Total Costs $25,008,000
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 8a) Page 3
Subject: Commence Eminent Domain Action for Public Purposes - Hwy 7 / Louisiana Ave Interchange Proj
Funding Sources
Federal (STP) Funds $7,630,000
Mn/DOT Access Management Funds $1,000,000
Mn/DOT Cooperative Agreement Funds $ 594,000
Mn/DOT (Construction Eng’r Value) $1,800,000
TED Grant (Mn/DOT & DEED Program) $3,000,000
City Funds (20% construction grant match – source HRA Levies) $2,398,000
City Funds (Preliminary and Final Design Eng’r – source HRA Levies) $1,818,000
City Funds (Right of Way – source HRA Levies) $2,700,000
City Water and Sewer Utility Funds $ 200,000
Total Committed Funds $21,140,000
Unfunded Amount $3,868,000
Funding
The City’s total necessary participation (including the funding gap) will be $10,984,000, or about
44 percent of the $25,008,000 project total. For comparison purposes, the city’s anticipated total
commitment on the Wooddale Avenue interchange is $8,151,729 or about 44 percent of the
$18,759,902 project total. Staff earlier advised Council that the city may have to participate to at
least the 50% level to fully capitalize this project. If Council is comfortable with the project
financing and willing to consider funding the remaining $3,868,000 gap (via HRA Levy
proceeds), staff recommends Council authorize Right of Way Acquisition Activities upon the
completion of the Pre-Acquisition Activities currently underway.
Schedule
The following schedule provides for a bid opening during February of 2013:
Right of Way Pre-Acquisition Activities May – July 2012
Right of Way Acquisition Activities (offers and negotiations) Late July – December 2012
Completion of Final Plans July – August 2012
Utility Relocations Fall 2012 – May 2013
Mn/DOT Approval of Plans, Specifications, Estimate Oct 2012
FHWA Authorizes Project Dec 2012
Advertise for Bids Jan 2013
Bid Opening Feb 2013
VISION CONSIDERATION:
The following Strategic Directions and focus areas have been identified by Council.
St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged community.
Focus will be on:
• Promoting regional transportation issues and related dedicated funding
sources affecting St. Louis Park including but not limited to Hwy. 100 and
SWLRT.
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 8a) Page 4
Subject: Commence Eminent Domain Action for Public Purposes - Hwy 7 / Louisiana Ave Interchange Proj
St. Louis Park is committed to promoting and integrating arts, culture and community
aesthetics in all city initiatives, including implementation where appropriate.
Attachments: Resolution
Exhibit A to Resolution
Exhibit B to Resolution (Parcel Map)
Prepared by: Jim Olson, Engineering Project Manager
Reviewed by: Michael P. Rardin, Public Works Director
Scott Brink, City Engineer
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 8a) Page 5
Subject: Commence Eminent Domain Action for Public Purposes - Hwy 7 / Louisiana Ave Interchange Proj
RESOLUTION NO. 12-____
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CONDEMNATION
OF LAND FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park does hereby determine that it
is necessary and for a public use and purpose to acquire additional right of way and temporary
construction easements from the property identified on the attached Exhibit "A" and depicted on
Exhibit “B” hereto, subject to engineering modifications, if any, for purposes in connection with
the Trunk Highway 7 and Louisiana Avenue Right of Way project; and
WHEREAS, City staff and consultants have and will continue to work with the property
owners to acquire the necessary property; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the construction timing makes it necessary to
acquire title to, and possession of, the property as soon as possible in order for the project to
proceed in an efficient, cost effective and expeditious manner.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park,
Minnesota:
1. That the City Attorney is authorized to commence eminent domain proceedings
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 117 to acquire the necessary right of way
and temporary construction easements identified on the attached Exhibits “A” and
“B”, subject to engineering modifications, if needed.
2. That the City Attorney is authorized to acquire the necessary property interests
pursuant to the “quick take” provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 117.042.
3. That the Mayor and the City Manager are authorized to execute all documents
necessary, in the opinion of the City Attorney, to effect the acquisition of the
necessary property interests.
4. The City is obtaining appraisals of the property being acquired. The Council
hereby authorizes the City Manager or designee to approve the appraisals and staff
to negotiate with the property owners relating to the acquisition of the property and
to acquire the property for the appraised values.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council July 16, 2012
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 8a) Page 6
Subject: Commence Eminent Domain Action for Public Purposes - Hwy 7 / Louisiana Ave Interchange Proj
EXHIBIT “A”
RESOLUTION NO. 12-____
Parcel 1
NAEGELE OUTDOOR ADV. INC
PIN No. 17-117-21-34-0073
Parcel 4
7201 LAKE LLC
PIN No. 17-117-21-43-0072
Parcel 5
SAM’S REAL ESTATE BUS. TRUST
PIN No. 17-117-21-43-0073
Parcel 9
CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR INC
PIN No. 17-117-21-43-0064
Parcel 12
R & N REAL ESTATE LLC
PIN No. 17-117-21-42-0092
Parcel 14
MSP SLP APARTMENTS LLC
PIN No. 17-117-21-34-0087
Parcel 15
ST. LOUIS PARK HOUSING PARTNERS
PIN No. 17-117-21-34-0086
ST. LOUIS PARK
CITY OF
171-172-142-0094
ST. LOUIS PARK
CITY OF
171-172-143-0077
OUTDOOR INC.
CLEAR CHANNEL
171-172-143-0064 ECON. DEVEL. AUT.
ST. LOUIS PARK
171-172-143-0065
J.M. LONEYS.H. LONEY &171-172-143-0040OAK HILL 7100 LLC
171-172-142-0072
R & N REAL ESTATE LLC
171-172-142-0092 ST. LOUIS PARK
CITY OF
171-172-131-0017
MSP SLP APARTMENTS LLC
171-172-134-0087
HOUSING PARTNERS
ST. LOUIS PARK
171-172-134-0086
NAEGELE OUTDOOR ADV INC.
171-172-134-0073
ECON. DEV. AUTH.
ST. LOUIS PARK
171-172-143-0074
7201 LAKE LLC
171-172-143-0072
ST. LOUIS PARK
CITY OF
201-172-112-0043
MAYFLOWER PROPERTIES LLC
201-172-112-0042
BUSINESS TRUST
SAM’S REAL ESTATE
171-172-143-0073
ST. LOUIS PARK
CITY OF
171-172-143-0076
ST. LOUIS PARK
CITY OF
171-172-143-0075
CENTER LLC
LAKE STREET OFFICE
171-172-143-0003
HIGHWAY 7 BUSINESS CENTER LLC
171-172-144-0069
CENTER LLC
LAKE STREET OFFICE
171-172-143-0002
N.S.P.
171-172-144-0059
B & D HOLDINGS LLC
171-172-144-0068
ST. LOUIS PARK
CITY OF
NO DATA
ADV INC.
NAEGELE OUTDOOR
171-172-134-0076
STATIONSTORES INC.
HOLIDAY
171-172-144-0039
PROPERTIES LLCSCHONE171-172-143-0037INVESTMENT CO.PHILIP’S171-172-142-00915/8/20122:31:25 PM S:\PT\S\Stlou\116227\5-dsgn\51-cadd\R-O-W\Right of Way Impacts Layout.dgn
CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK, MN.
ST. PAUL, MN 55110
3535 VADNAIS CENTER DR.
PHONE: (651)490-2000
T.H. 7 / LOUISIANA AVE.
S.P. NO. 2706-226 S.P. NO. 163-010-038FRONTAGE RD.
W. LAKE ST.
LEGEND
WALKER ST.
WB TH 7
EB TH 7 LOUI
SI
ANA AVE.
WALKER ST.
REPUBLIC A
VE.MO
NITOR ST.LOUI
SI
ANA AVE.
RIGHT OF WAY NEEDS
0
feetscale
100 100 200
50
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
16
17
DRAFT
PROPERTY OWNERNO.
PARCEL
PID NO.
SQ FT
MNDOT
NEW R/W
SQ FT
CITY
NEW R/W
SQ FT
CITY
TEMP. ESMT.
SQ FT
MNDOT
TEMP. ESMT.
SQ FT
TOTAL
NEW R/W
SQ FT
TOTAL
TEMP. ESMT.
(DESC.)
IMPACTS
OTHER
BILLBOARD(1X)
BILLBOARD(2X)
TEMPORARY EASEMENT - CITY
RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION - CITY
TEMPORARY EASEMENT - MNDOT
RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION - MNDOT
PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY
EXISTING CITY RIGHT OF WAY/PARCEL LINES
EXISTING MNDOT RIGHT OF WAY
PROPOSED LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
PROPOSED CONSRUCTION
CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK (R/W)
CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK (R/W)
ST. LOUIS PARK HOUSING PARTNERS
MSP SLP APARTMENTS LLC
CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK
R & N REAL ESTATE LLC
CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK
CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK
CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR INC.
ST. LOUIS PARK ECON.DEVEL.AUT.
CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK
CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK
SAM’S REAL ESTATE BUS. TRUST
7201 LAKE LLC
CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK
ST. LOUIS PARK ECON.DEV. AUTH.
NAEGELE OUTDOOR ADV. INC.
NO DATA
NO DATA
171-172-134-0086
171-172-134-0087
171-172-131-0017
171-172-142-0092
171-172-142-0094
171-172-143-0077
171-172-143-0064
171-172-143-0065
171-172-143-0075
171-172-143-0076
171-172-143-0073
171-172-143-0072
201-172-112-0043
171-172-143-0074
171-172-134-0073
68,533
652
1,305
6,560
18,218
3,069
4,351
17,684
16,694
116,016
2,528
3,400
3,813
19,514
21,474
6,179
37,954
1,019
1,497
18,638
Total
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
29,047
7,209
2,315
2,589
16,934
35,882
4,176
2,668
3,371
4,919
843
6,656
2,724
2,830
7,695
BILLBOARD(1X)
BILLBOARD(2X)
184,549
652
3,833
3,400
3,813
26,074
39,692
3,069
6,179
42,305
1,019
1,497
36,322
16,694
64,929
7,209
0
2,315
6,765
2,668
3,371
4,919
843
6,656
2,724
2,830
7,695
16,934
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 8a)
Subject: Commence Eminent Domain Action for Public Purposes - Hwy 7 / Louisiana Ave Interchange Proj Page 7
Meeting Date: July 16, 2012
Agenda Item #: 8b
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Project Report: Roadway/Trail Improvement – Beltline Boulevard at Regional Trail Crossing
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to Adopt Resolution accepting the project report, establishing the project, approving
plans and specifications and authorizing advertisement for bids.
POICY CONSIDERATION:
Does Council desire to move forward with this project as previously directed?
BACKGROUND:
At the December 12, 2011 Study Session, Council was presented with a variety of treatment
options and strategies for improving safety at the Regional Trail crossings at both Wooddale
Avenue and Beltline Boulevard.
Staff returned to Council at the Study Session on February 13, 2012 to discuss the options
further. At this meeting Council directed staff to continue to move forward with the Wooddale
Improvements as recommended. For the Beltline crossing, Council directed staff to investigate
other possible options further and return to Council for additional discussion at a later date.
Staff returned to Council at the Study Session on March 26, 2012 to present a proposal for
constructing a wider refuge median, along with a slight re-alignment of the trail. No consensus
was reached on this proposal, and Council expressed a desire to discuss the subject again at a
future study session.
The subject was subsequently discussed again on May 7, and Council was presented the
following options for consideration and action:
1. Do nothing – leave as is.
2. Operating Beltline as a four-lane undivided roadway with preference (right of way) to
trail users by installing a traffic control device such as a traffic signal, or a “hawk,” and
installing a marked crosswalk.
3. Maintaining Beltline as a four-lane divided roadway with preference (right of way) to
roadway users, but enhancing the crossing by widening the roadway, constructing a wider
median (12 feet), and re-aligning the trail crossing approaches. No crosswalk markings
would be installed.
4. Constructing a two-lane divided roadway with preference (right of way) to roadway
users, including the installation of a wide median (approximately 22’ in width) and
angling the crossing within the median to allow better visibility for all users. Because of
potential traffic issues, this option was not recommended for actual construction right
away, but rather as a trial or pilot measure with temporary traffic controls to evaluate
effectiveness and other potential traffic impacts of concern.
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 8b) Page 2
Subject: Project Report: Roadway/Trail Improvement – Beltline Boulevard at Regional Trail Crossing
Other factors considered and discussed as part of the options included the following:
1. Trail user safety vs. street user safety
2. Trail user traffic flow vs. street user traffic flow
3. The wide variation and range of trail users: young to old users, inexperienced to
experienced users, commuter users, recreational users, slow speed to high speed use, safe
to high risk behaviors of users
4. Time to implement a particular improvement or crossing change
5. Safety, traffic, and construction impacts to neighboring properties, including adjacent
railroad and street intersections
6. Roadway vs. trail user right-of-way along with reducing or eliminating confusion
amongst users
7. Input and/or requirements of other agencies (Hennepin County Regional Railroad
Authority, Three Rivers Park District, CP Rail, SLP PD, etc.)
8. Estimated costs
After discussion, the consensus of a majority of the Council was to direct staff to pursue Option
3, constructing the wider median and re-aligning the trail (see attached meeting minutes).
As a result, staff commenced survey design and engaged SRF to begin the process of preparing
plans and specifications for the proposed work.
Proposed Project
SRF has completed plans and specifications. The plans provide for widening the roadway to the
east and holding the west curb line. This will allow for the center median to widen up to 12 feet,
while maintaining the existing traffic lane widths. The crossing location itself will shift slightly
north. This is necessary in order to facilitate the widening without affecting the roadway
crossing at the railroad, and to avoid impacts to private property. In addition, the shift to the
north also allows for re-alignment of the trail approaches to the roadway, thus creating an extra
measure of visibility, awareness, and safety for both trail and roadway users.
The project as designed however does require some grading and sloping on private property.
Staff has engaged in discussions with the property owners and has received concurrence and
support for the improvements.
Project Timeline:
Should the City Council approve this Project, the following schedule is proposed:
Approval of Plans/Authorization to Bid by City Council July 16, 2012
Bid Tab Report to City Council; Award contract August 20, 2012
Begin Construction September 4, 2012
Construction complete November 2012
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 8b) Page 3
Subject: Project Report: Roadway/Trail Improvement – Beltline Boulevard at Regional Trail Crossing
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATIONS:
This project was not previously planned for nor included in the City’s adopted Capital
Improvement Program (C.I.P.). The total cost of this project is currently estimated at $150,000
and based on the current situation can be funded using the Development Fund, General Fund,
and a possible contribution from the Three Rivers Park District. The estimated costs and funding
sources are as follows:
Estimated Costs
Construction Cost $100,000
Contingencies (10%) $ 10,000
Engineering & Administration $ 40,000
$150,000
Funding Sources
City of St. Louis Park $ 150,000
The Three Rivers Park District has been requested to cost share in this project and District staff
have expressed an interest in doing so. This request is currently undergoing evaluation and
consideration by District staff and the Board. Based on the current schedule of this project and
District discussions, it should be known if the District will cost share in this project prior to the
city awarding a contract for this project.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
The following Strategic Direction and focus area was identified by Council in 2007:
St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged community.
Focus will be on:
• Promoting regional transportation issues
Attachments: Resolution
Excerpt from Special Study Session Meeting of May 7, 2012
Exhibit 1 - Plan View Graphics
Prepared by: Scott Brink, City Engineer
Reviewed by: Michael P. Rardin, Director of Public Works
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 8b) Page 4
Subject: Project Report: Roadway/Trail Improvement – Beltline Boulevard at Regional Trail Crossing
RESOLUTION NO. 12-____
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE PROJECT REPORT,
ESTABLISHING THE BELTLINE BOULEVARD REGIONAL TRAIL CROSSING
IMPROVEMENT, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND
AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR BELTLINE BOULEVARD
REGIONAL TRAIL CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park has received a report from the
City Engineer related to The Beltline Boulevard Regional Trail Crossing Improvement.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis
Park, Minnesota, that:
1. The Project Report regarding the Beltline Boulevard Regional Trail Crossing
Improvement is hereby accepted.
2. Such improvements as proposed are necessary, cost effective, and feasible as detailed
in the Project Report.
3. The proposed project is hereby established and ordered.
4. The plans and specifications for the making of these improvements, as prepared under
the direction of the City Engineer, or designee, are approved.
5. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted at least two weeks in the official
City newspaper an advertisement for bids for the making of said improvements under
said-approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall appear not less than
ten (10) days prior to the date and time bids will be received by the City Clerk, and
that no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the City Clerk and
accompanied by a bid bond payable to the City for five (5) percent of the amount of
the bid.
6. The City Engineer, or designee, shall report the receipt of bids to the City Council
shortly after the letting date. The report shall include a tabulation of the bid results
and a recommendation to the City Council.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council July 16 , 2012
City Manager
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 8b) Page 5
Subject: Project Report: Roadway/Trail Improvement – Beltline Boulevard at Regional Trail Crossing
Excerpt from Special Study Session Meeting of May 7, 2012
2. Beltline Boulevard Trail Improvement Options
Mr. Rardin presented the staff report and asked what the problem is. There are several possible
options for infrastructure improvements depending upon what Council feels is wrong and what
outcomes they would like to see.
Councilmember Mavity stated there is a complete lack of clarity for drivers and trail users in this
area; in addition, trail user safety as currently laid out is compromised and the current crossing is
not sufficiently safe.
Councilmember Sanger agreed that safety is severely compromised in this area and stated that
the expectations currently placed on drivers and trail users are different than the expectations
placed on them in other communities. She added the City is not in harmony with other
communities and has contributed to the confusion. She stated the current problem needs a
temporary solution because the only viable long-term solution is a grade separated crossing.
Councilmember Santa stated that drivers and trail users in this area do not know what to do and
traffic flow on Beltline is compromised. She indicated she has seen people driving along
Beltline and because there is no marked crosswalk, they believe they have the right-of-way until
bikes come through the intersection.
Councilmember Spano stated the City is likely not the first community to have confronted this
issue and pointed out a recognized authority looked at the intersection and has presented two
options to Council for improving safety in the area. He felt the real challenge for the City is to
get everyone on the same page as it relates to trail crossings.
Councilmember Ross stated that the consultants felt that painted crosswalks were not an option
and provided Council with their suggestions for improving the intersection.
Councilmember Mavity indicated the consultants said painted crosswalks were not an option
without other additional improvements such as a traffic signal.
Councilmember Sanger stated one of things that appalled her about the expert’s suggested
solution was that there was nothing that addressed educating drivers about their obligations.
Mr. Rardin stated if the City wants to give trail users the right-of-way this will have to be a
marked crosswalk and signalized intersection, which will impact traffic flow on Beltline. He
noted that the activation of a signal would also have to be tied into the railroad crossing.
Councilmember Mavity stated that narrowing the roadway to two lanes might work as indicated
in Option 4.
Mayor Jacobs stated that Option 4 would impact traffic flow and did not agree that this option
would work.
Councilmember Hallfin suggested adding signage for drivers to make it clear that trail users have
to stop and street traffic has the right-of-way.
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 8b) Page 6
Subject: Project Report: Roadway/Trail Improvement – Beltline Boulevard at Regional Trail Crossing
Councilmember Ross felt that Option 3 was the cheapest alternative and appeared to make the
most sense in the short term. She added that Council will revisit this issue once light rail comes
through.
Councilmember Sanger stated she did not agree with Option 3 and was vehemently against this
option. She stated it was important to remember that a trail user has nothing to protect them in a
crash and the City needs to provide a way for trail users to operate safely and in the same manner
as in other communities. She felt that Option 3 would waste $150,000 and would do nothing to
make this a safer crossing.
Councilmember Hallfin stated residents have told him that the issue is that the crossing is
confusing and nobody knows what to do. He felt that adding signs on the trail telling trail users
what they are supposed to do would help and stated he was in favor of Option 3 with the addition
of some signage that gives clear direction to drivers.
Councilmember Mavity stated that Option 3 simply provides four more feet in the median but
the nature of the crossing does not change. She felt if the City was going to spend $150,000, a
signalized crossing with a crosswalk should be installed because this will tell everyone exactly
what they are supposed to do and would provide absolute clarity for drivers and trail users.
Councilmember Spano agreed that Option 3 does not change what is happening inside the street
but it does provide a wider median and by changing the trail user’s approach to traffic, it
hopefully makes them more aware of traffic in the area.
Mayor Jacobs and Councilmembers Hallfin, Ross, Santa, and Spano were in favor of Option 3.
Councilmember Mavity requested that the minutes state that Council indicated at the beginning
of this discussion that complexity or confusion was the main problem with the Beltline crossing.
She noted that Option 3 is the only solution that does not appear to address the complexity issue.
Councilmember Sanger suggested that the City install a sign before spending $150,000 to see if
it makes any difference in driver behavior and whether people stop with any consistency.
Councilmember Spano stated that Option 3 does not preclude the City from moving to Option 2
and installing a signalized interchange in the future.
It was the majority consensus of the City Council to proceed with Option 3 - street users have
priority (right-of-way) over trail users (4-lane street) and to install additional signage as
appropriate.
Mr. Harmening noted that staff will need to consult with the City Attorney regarding signage.
The meeting adjourned at 7:13 p.m.
______________________________________ ______________________________________
Nancy Stroth, City Clerk Jeff Jacobs, Mayor
March 26, 2012
Beltline Trail Crossing Visualization GraphicsCity of St. Louis Park
Existing Plan
(not to scale)
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 8b)
Subject: Project Report Roadway/Trail Imporvement - Beltline Boulevard at Regional Trail Crossing Page 7
March 26, 2012
Beltline Trail Crossing Visualization GraphicsCity of St. Louis Park
Proposed Plan
(not to scale)
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 8b)
Subject: Project Report Roadway/Trail Imporvement - Beltline Boulevard at Regional Trail Crossing Page 8
March 26, 2012
Beltline Trail Crossing Visualization GraphicsCity of St. Louis Park
Existing Alignment - Bird’s Eye View
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 8b)
Subject: Project Report Roadway/Trail Imporvement - Beltline Boulevard at Regional Trail Crossing Page 9
March 26, 2012
Beltline Trail Crossing Visualization GraphicsCity of St. Louis Park
Proposed Alignment - Bird’s Eye View
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 8b)
Subject: Project Report Roadway/Trail Imporvement - Beltline Boulevard at Regional Trail Crossing Page 10
March 26, 2012
Beltline Trail Crossing Visualization GraphicsCity of St. Louis Park
Existing Alignment - Photo
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 8b)
Subject: Project Report Roadway/Trail Imporvement - Beltline Boulevard at Regional Trail Crossing Page 11
March 26, 2012
Beltline Trail Crossing Visualization GraphicsCity of St. Louis Park
Proposed Alignment - Photo Visualization
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 8b)
Subject: Project Report Roadway/Trail Imporvement - Beltline Boulevard at Regional Trail Crossing Page 12
Meeting Date: July 16, 2012
Agenda Item #: 8c
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Special Meeting Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Special Session Other:
TITLE:
Preliminary and Final Plat – Eldridge Fifth Addition (Application #12-15-S)
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to Adopt Resolution approving the preliminary and final plat of Eldridge Fifth Addition
subject to conditions.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Does the City Council wish to approve the preliminary and final plat?
BACKGROUND:
The applicant, A.K.A.R.E. Properties LLC, requests approval of a Preliminary and Final Plat to
subdivide one lot into two lots to be described as Lot 1 and Lot 2, Block 1, Eldridge 5th Addition.
Lot 2 would be sold for development of a single-house. Lot 1 would remain in City ownership
indefinitely.
This application pertains to a City-owned parcel that was included in the Excess Land Task
Force study in 2005. Attached to this report is a detailed description of the excess land process
in general, as well as the findings related to the subject parcel specifically.
Site Location Map:
Comprehensive Plan Designations: Low Density Residential, Parks and Open Space
Zoning Districts: R-1 Single Family Residential, Parks and Open Space
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 8c) Page 2
Title: Preliminary and Final Plat – Eldridge Fifth Addition
Public Input:
The applicant held a neighborhood meeting on June 11, 2012. Four people attended the meeting
to get more information about the proposal. There were no major concerns raised at the meeting.
The Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 20, 2012. One neighbor attended the
meeting and asked a question regarding drainage. The Planning Commission recommended
approval of the preliminary and final plat subject to conditions.
Plat Analysis:
If approved, the plat will create two lots from one lot (see attached Preliminary and Final Plat
exhibits). The property is currently vacant, except for a City storm water pond, several utilities,
and a driveway for the neighboring church that partially encroaches onto the property. The
property is 628,103 sq. ft. (14.419 acres). Of that, 66,632 square feet is upland area. The
remainder of the lot is wetland and under Hannon Lake.
The proposed Lot 1 area would be 458,326 square feet (10.52 acres). Of that, 44,161 square feet
would be upland. This lot would remain in City ownership indefinitely. No changes are
proposed to this site.
The proposed Lot 2 area would be 169,777 square feet (3.90 acres). Of that, 0.51 acres would be
upland. The property would be sold to the applicant for development of one single-family
residence.
Zoning Requirements:
The property is partially within the R-1 Single Family Residential zoning district and partially
within the POS Parks and Open Space zoning district (see attached Zoning Map exhibit). The
upland portion of the property is in the R-1 district, and is appropriately zoned for the proposed
single-family house on Lot 2.
The proposed plat meets the zoning requirements of minimum lot size and width for the R-1
Single Family Residential District. The minimum required lot size is 9,000 square feet, and Lot 1
and 2 will both exceed the minimum lot size. The minimum required lot width is 75 feet, and
Lot 1 and Lot 2 will be 324 feet wide and 140 feet wide respectively.
Home Construction:
The applicant provided a concept house footprint for Lot 2 (see attached Preliminary Grading
and Tree Preservation Plan). The proposed concept plan uses most of the buildable area
available. There are several constraints on the property, including drainage and utility
easements, zoning setbacks, and wetland setbacks. The proposed concept plan meets the
required setbacks and avoids any easements encroachments.
A building elevation and floor plan have not been provided with the application, but will be
required prior to closing on the property per the purchase agreement. The applicant intends to
build a house that is two stories tall with a walk out basement (three stories on the lake side) and
an attached three-car garage.
Grading and Drainage:
The property slopes down from Cedar Lake Road to Hannon Lake. There is about 16 feet
difference in elevation from Cedar lake Road down to the surface water elevation of Hannon
Lake. The property will drain south and southwest to Hannon Lake and the City stormwater
pond.
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 8c) Page 3
Title: Preliminary and Final Plat – Eldridge Fifth Addition
The applicant intends to minimize excavation and grading work. He intends to use helical piles
to support the building. The Zoning Ordinance allows a property owner to import/export up to
400 cubic yards of material to the site without a conditional use permit. To date, the applicant
believes he will not need to import/export 400 cubic yards. Exact calculations will be submitted
with a building permit. If it is determined at that time that a conditional use permit is required,
then the applicant must make application prior to City approval of the building permit.
The Public Works Department reviewed the preliminary grading plan and determined that it is
acceptable.
Right-of-Way Dedications:
The proposed plat has frontage on Cedar Lake Road. The City Engineering Department
reviewed the plat, and determined that the City does not need additional right-of-way.
Street Access:
The proposed house would add a driveway onto Cedar Lake Road.
As noted previously, the neighboring church has a driveway that partially encroaches onto the
subject property. It is anticipated that the church will either narrow or more likely relocate the
driveway westerly to eliminate the encroachment.
Tree Replacement:
Most of the trees on the property are “volunteer” trees and generally less desirable species (i.e.
Cottonwood, Siberian Elm, Boxelder). Of the sixteen trees proposed to be removed; only three
are considered “significant trees.” These three trees are Cottonwood trees in the proposed
driveway area and are over 12 inches in diameter at breast level. There are also several trees
being preserved on the site. A tree replacement calculation and plan will be required to be
submitted prior to issuance of a building permit.
Sidewalks:
There is an existing sidewalk along the south side of Cedar Lake Road that will be maintained or
replaced/repaired as necessary.
Minnehaha Creek Watershed District:
Erosion control permits from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, and the City, will be
required prior to beginning construction on the site. Minnehaha Creek did not submit any
comments regarding the proposal.
Utilities:
The Zoning Ordinance requires all utility service lines for new house to be buried underground.
The utilities in the area are adequate to support the proposed house. Utility companies were
notified of the application and none of the utilities has concerns regarding the application.
Easements:
There are a number of drainage and utility easements provided on the plat. The easements meet
the minimum requirements of the subdivision ordinance (5 feet along interior lot lines and 10
feet along public right-of-ways). In addition, there are easements provided over several existing
stormwater and other utilities. Also, an easement is provided over the all of the property under
Hannon Lake.
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 8c) Page 4
Title: Preliminary and Final Plat – Eldridge Fifth Addition
Park and Trail Dedication:
The applicant will pay cash-in-lieu of park land dedication and a trail dedication fee for one
single-family lot.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
As was done with the previous excess land parcels that have been sold, the Housing Authority
has entered into a purchase agreement with the developer for the sale of the lot in question. The
sale price is $76,000 and the proceeds of the sale will be placed in a fund previously established
for these dollars that are used for a tree reforestation program in the community
VISION CONSIDERATION:
St. Louis Park is committed to providing a well-maintained and diverse housing stock.
Attachments: Resolution
Excerpt of the Unofficial Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
Summary of Excess Land Process and Findings
Zoning Map of the Subject Area
Preliminary Plat
Final Plat
Preliminary Grading and Tree Preservation Plan
Prepared by: Sean Walther, Senior Planner
Reviewed by: Meg McMonigal, Planning and Zoning Supervisor
Kevin Locke, Community Development Director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 8c) Page 5
Title: Preliminary and Final Plat – Eldridge Fifth Addition
RESOLUTION NO. 12-____
RESOLUTION GIVING APPROVAL FOR PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT OF
ELDRIDGE FIFTH ADDITION
BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of St. Louis Park:
Findings
1. A.K.A.R.E. Properties LLC has submitted an application for approval of
preliminary and final plat of Eldridge Fifth Addition in the manner required for platting of land
under the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code, and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder.
2. The proposed preliminary and final plat has been found to be in all respects
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the
State of Minnesota and the ordinances of the City of St. Louis Park.
3. The proposed plat is situated upon the following described lands in Hennepin
County, Minnesota, to-wit:
That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter lying South
of Cedar Lake Road and Westerly of a line described as: Beginning at a
point in the South line of said Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter
200 feet West of the Southeast comer thereof; thence North parallel with
the East line of said quarter-quarter 300 feet; thence deflecting to the
left in a Northwesterly direction at an angle of 55 degrees 44 minutes and
a distance of 532.9 feet: thence deflecting to the left in a Westerly
direction at an angle of 38 degrees 51 minutes a distance of 190 feet;
thence deflecting to the right in a Northerly direction at an angle of 90
degrees 00 minutes to the Centerline of Cedar Lake Road and there
terminating.
That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter lying South
of Cedar Lake Road and lying East of o line drawn parallel with the West
line of said Section from a point on the South line of said Northwest
Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, distant 1175 feet East, measured along
said South line from the Southwest comer of said Northwest Quarter of
the Southwest Quarter.
all in Section 7, Township 117, Range 21.
Conclusion
1. The proposed preliminary and final plat of Eldridge Fifth Addition is hereby
approved and accepted by the City as being in accord and conformity with all ordinances, City
plans and regulations of the City of St. Louis Park and the laws of the State of Minnesota,
provided, however, that this approval is made subject to the opinion of the City Attorney and
Certification by the City Clerk subject to the following conditions:
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 8c) Page 6
Title: Preliminary and Final Plat – Eldridge Fifth Addition
a. Prior to starting any site work, the following conditions shall be met:
i. Assent form and official exhibits must be signed by the applicant and owner.
ii. All necessary permits must be obtained, including but not limited to, City
building, erosion control and right-of-way permits.
iii. All Minnehaha Creek Watershed Management permits must be issued.
b. Prior to filing a final plat:
i. Park dedication fees must be received by the City ($1,500).
ii. Trail dedication fees must be received by the City prior to filing a final plat
($225).
iii. A financial security in the form of a cash escrow or letter of credit in the
amount of $1,000 to insure that a signed Mylar copy of the final plat is
provided to the City.
c. Prior to issuance of a building permit:
i. The final plat shall be recorded with Hennepin County.
ii. The applicant shall submit a financial security in the form of cash escrow or
letter of credit in the amount of 125% of the costs of tree replacement,
required landscaping, placement of iron monuments, and repair/cleaning of
public streets, sidewalks and utilities.
iii. A tree replacement calculation and plan must be submitted to the City for
administrative review and approval.
d. The applicant shall comply with the following conditions during construction:
i. All City noise ordinances shall be complied with, including limiting
construction hours to between 7:00 AM and 10:00 PM Monday through
Friday and between 9:00 AM and 10:00 PM on Saturdays.
ii. The site shall be kept free of dust and debris that could blow onto neighboring
properties.
iii. Public streets shall be maintained free of dirt and shall be cleaned as
necessary.
iv. Sidewalk along Cedar Lake Road shall generally remain open and safely
passable during construction. Intermittent interruptions due to construction
activities are allowed.
e. All utilities servicing the new house are to be placed underground.
f. Developer or owner shall pay an administrative fee of $750 per violation of any
condition of this agreement.
2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to supply two certified copies of this Resolution
to the above-named owner and subdivider, who is the applicant herein.
3. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute all contracts
required herein, and the City Clerk is hereby directed to execute the certificate of approval on
behalf of the City Council upon the said plat when all of the conditions set forth in Paragraph
No. 1 above and the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code have been fulfilled.
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 8c) Page 7
Title: Preliminary and Final Plat – Eldridge Fifth Addition
4. Such execution of the certificate upon said plat by the City Clerk, as required
under Section 26-123(1)j of the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code, shall be conclusive showing of
proper compliance therewith by the subdivider and City officials charged with duties above
described and shall entitle such plat to be placed on record forthwith without further formality.
The City Clerk is instructed to record certified copies of this resolution in the Office of the
Hennepin County Register of Deeds or Registrar of Titles as the case may be.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council July 16, 2012
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 8c) Page 8
Title: Preliminary and Final Plat – Eldridge Fifth Addition
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
June 20, 2012 – 6:00 p.m.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MEMBERS PRESENT: Claudia Johnston-Madison, Robert Kramer,
Dennis Morris, Carl Robertson,
MEMBERS ABSENT: Lynne Carper, Richard Person, Larry Shapiro
STAFF PRESENT: Meg McMonigal, Gary Morrison, Sean Walther,
Scott Brink, Nancy Sells
1. Call to Order – Roll Call
2. Approval of Minutes of May 16, 2012
Commissioner Morris made a motion recommending approval of the minutes of May 16,
2012. Commissioner Johnston-Madison seconded the motion, and the motion passed on
a vote of 3-0-1 (Robertson abstained).
3. Public Hearings
A. Preliminary and Final Plat – Eldridge 5th Addition
Location: 9019 Cedar Lake Road S.
Applicant: Ridge Creek Custom Homes
Case No.: 12-15-S
Sean Walther, Senior Planner, presented the staff report. He explained that the parcel is
essentially vacant and fronts the road in-between Flag Avenue and Westwood Church.
He noted the proposed subdivision would divide the lot into two properties. Lot 2 would
be sold to the developer for purposes of a single family home construction and the Lot 1
is City-owned with no proposed changes at this time.
Mr. Walther explained why a great deal of the subject property is unbuildable; primarily
related to Hannon Lake, wetlands, and drainage and utility easements.
Mr. Walther spoke about one new driveway which would be added onto Cedar Lake
Road. He noted that the church driveway encroachment will need to be removed from
Lot 2.
Mr. Walther stated that the application meets all requirements.
Commissioner Robertson stated that Lot 1 will be a very odd configuration. He asked
why so much of the lake is included in Lot 2. He asked why the plat couldn’t be three
lots.
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 8c) Page 9
Title: Preliminary and Final Plat – Eldridge Fifth Addition
Mr. Walther responded that Hannon Lake is a non-meandered lake and it is typical for the
lots to extend out into the lake and out to the center of the lake. The proposed Lot 1 has
the shape it does in order to maintain access to a street and meet subdivision
requirements.
Commissioner Morris noted that the plat signature page shows the City of Golden Valley
rather than St. Louis Park.
Mr. Walther said that error will be corrected prior to the City Council meeting.
Commissioner Morris asked if the city was an applicant for the plat.
Mr. Walther stated that the developer has applied for the plat. There is a purchase
agreement for Lot 2 and the City is essentially a consenting party to the application.
Commissioner Morris stated in his career he had never processed a water plat. He asked
if that portion of the lake had become tax forfeited.
Mr. Walther said he didn’t know if was acquired through tax forfeit. He discussed the
excess land public process studying 19 sites in St. Louis Park.
Commissioner Morris had questions about shoreline tax forfeited property. He said
typically the DNR maintains an access easement or shoreline easement.
Mr. Walther stated that the DNR received a copy of the plat application and had no
comments. The City Attorney ordered a title search and verified that the City does have
clear title to the property. He added that Hannon Lake is a DNR protected public water
and is considered public water up to the ordinary high water level.
Commissioner Robertson asked if this would be the only development that would occur
on Lots 1 and 2 or is Lot 2 still open for further development on the upland property.
Mr. Walther said Lot 2 has only enough width for one lot. Lot 1 could see additional
development in the future but the City intends to hold it indefinitely. One additional
single family house on the western side of the upland would likely be the maximum
development on the site.
The applicant, Rob Eldridge of Ridge Creek Custom Homes/AKARE Companies, said
the storm sewer utility that runs through the property made it impossible to construct a
second house.
Chair Kramer asked if the developer had received any negative feedback.
Mr. Eldridge said only four neighbors came to the recent open house. No negative
feedback was received other than concern about the start of construction disturbing
wildlife nests. He said the goal is to begin digging in the fall to avoid that kind of
disturbance. He noted that conversations with the church about the driveway have been
very good. Efforts between construction of the development driveway and the new
church driveway will be coordinated to share costs.
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 8c) Page 10
Title: Preliminary and Final Plat – Eldridge Fifth Addition
Chair Kramer opened the public hearing.
Mr. Walther acknowledged an email received late afternoon on June 20th from Bruce
Levin, 9105 Stanlen Road. The correspondence was distributed to the Commission just
before the meeting.
Meg McMonigal, Planning and Zoning Supervisor, summarized the comments which
included a question about Lot 1 which was raised by Commissioner Robertson and
answered by Mr. Walther earlier. Also mentioned were comments that the house would
be out of character for the neighborhood, one lot would increase traffic in the area, trees
should remain as a visual buffer, comments about the appearance and neighborhood
integrity, and a comment that the developer’s subdivision at 8849 Minnetonka Blvd. was
on small lots. Ms. McMonigal noted that these are fairly large lots.
Steven Kenny, 9200 W. 28th St., asked how run-off to the lake from the west would be
affected.
Mr. Walther explained the drainage outlets. He said the preliminary grading plan is set
up so that a portion of the property will drain directly into the pond and the remainder
will drain into Hannon Lake. It will be limited to the footprint of the house and the
driveway which is a relatively small change to the amount of impervious surface. A silt
fence will surround the entire area disturbed during construction.
Chair Kramer closed the public hearing as there was no one else present wishing to
speak.
Commissioner Robertson stated that other than being an odd shaped plat, the application
is very straightforward. He commented that a single house at the site will be very nice
and should be a successful home. He made a motion recommending approval of the
Preliminary and Final Plat of Eldridge 5th Addition, subject to conditions included in the
staff report. Commissioner Johnston-Madison seconded the motion, and the motion
passed on a vote of 4-0.
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 8c) Page 11
Title: Preliminary and Final Plat – Eldridge Fifth Addition
Summary of Excess Land Process and Findings
The following are excerpts taken from City Council Meetings of October 17, November 14,
and December 2005.
Excess Land Task Force
The City Council created the Excess Land Task Force in January of 2005 to address the City’s
housing goals. The housing goal to increase the number of single family homes evolved from
the two year Housing Summit process that reviewed the City’s housing priorities. It identified
the need for more “move-up” housing (3+ bedrooms and 2+ bathrooms) as a high priority. This
need was also identified during the City’s Visioning process in the 1990’s.
The Excess Land Task Force was given 19 (25 acres) parcels to evaluate for family home sites.
Seven of these parcels (13 acres) are owned out right by the City. Three of the parcels (1 ½
acres) were public parking lots. Six of the parcels (4 ½ acres) are tax forfeited parcels the city
controls; and, three more of the parcels (3 1/2 acres) are excess MNDOT rights of way, which
the City can acquire for sale.
The Task Force set criteria to evaluate the sites, visited all the sites and held a public meeting to
seek input from the community. They recommended that the City Council sell most of the sites
but that additional info gathering and analysis was needed before a final decision was made to
sell parcels for move up family homes. Many important issues were raised by the community at
the Task Force’s public meeting and the Task Force felt it was important to address those issues
before a final decision to sell any property was made.
Rationale for Considering the 19 Vacant Parcels as Excess Land
19 parcels were considered for potential use for single-family home sites. Many of the sites were
identified by the 1995 Park and Open Space Task Force; other sites were identified between
2002 and 2004 as a response to the growing awareness of the need for more housing for families
with children, as well as addressing Local Government Aid budget cuts and frequent resident
phone calls inquiring about purchasing vacant lots.
The questions below were used by the 1995 Park and Open Space Task Force to identify the best
use of vacant parcels within the city.
• Does this parcel clearly serve basic needs of the community or of multiple
neighborhoods?
• Does this parcel clearly serve basic needs of the host neighborhood?
• Does this parcel serve as a buffer between residential and commercial developments?
• Does this parcel serve as focal point for neighborhood activities?
• Does this parcel provide linkage between community facilities and community
spaces?
• Is this parcel unique and/or does it contribute to a variety of public spaces?
• Is this parcel physically accessible and visually accessible to the neighborhood,
surrounding neighborhood, or to others outside the neighborhood?
• If this parcel were developed, what would be the best and worst case scenarios (in
terms of zoning, tax generation, wetland issues, impacts on the neighborhood, and
impacts on the community?
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 8c) Page 12
Title: Preliminary and Final Plat – Eldridge Fifth Addition
Similar factors were considered to identify additional parcels since 1995. The Parks and
Recreation, Public Works and Community Development staff’s final list of vacant parcels
determined to be excess were put forth for consideration based on the following factors:
• Is the parcel relatively small, with limited opportunity to accommodate recreational
use?
• Is the parcel accessible to the public?
• Is the parcel’s current public use minimal?
• Would the impact of the parcel’s development negatively impact existing natural
corridors?
• Is the parcel needed for storm water or utility needs?
• Would sale of the parcel decrease City maintenance costs?
• Where a parcel is contiguous with existing parkland, how important is the parcel to
the function of the park?
• Is the parcel vacant and publicly owned by another jurisdiction which is no longer
using the parcel?
Excess Land Task Force Recommendations
The Task Force began its consideration of the excess land parcels in January 2005 and, following
input from the public, concluded that additional technical analysis was needed to evaluate the
suitability of the excess land parcels as sites for single-family homes. Over the summer (2005)
staff conducted detailed analysis of the excess land parcels. The technical analysis found some
sites suitable for housing and others not. The technical analysis supports the finding that nine of
the parcels are buildable as large single family home sites and two of the parcels are suitable for
building other types of housing.
Following is the Task Force recommendation for the 9019 Cedar Lake Road parcel.
• Direct staff to take the necessary steps to sell parcel to developer for building up to four
single family homes, ensure design guidelines and sale process are implemented. Sale
would only occur after developer has submitted acceptable site and house plans.
[See following page for more details related to the 9019 Cedar Lake Road parcel.]
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 8c) Page 13
Title: Preliminary and Final Plat – Eldridge Fifth Addition
Task Force Recommendation for 9019 Cedar Lake Road Parcel
#10 9019 Cedar Lake Road
Zoning Parcel Size Estimated Market Value
R1 Portion of 14.37 acre $100,000/lot
Conclusions of Technical Findings
This parcel is deemed suitable for building housing based on the findings from the topographical
survey and wetland delineation study. See survey. This multi-lot parcel (up to four single family
homes) has significant grade challenges. Due to the steep grades and proximity to the lake and
wetland, it is suggested that “requests for development proposals” of the full parcel be let to
developers and residents with demonstrated capacity to develop such a parcel.
Task Force Recommendation
General consensus that further exploration of slope and wetland issues be completed before
pursuing subdividing the upland portion for development of up to 2 single family homes.
Summary of Public Input
There was little comment regarding this parcel. Some residents have expressed concern that
their view of Hannon Lake would be obstructed. One resident expressed interest in building a
vineyard on this site. Other residents around Hannon Lake were very curious as they believed
another development on the South side of Hannon Lake was being proposed.
Findings
• Physical Considerations
A topographical survey and wetland delineation study was conducted on this parcel. The
survey does show significant grade changes within this parcel. The upland vegetation
includes American elms, willows, unknown grasses, reed canary grass and green ash.
The buildable area above the 100 year flood plan is 50,620 sq. feet and four single family
homes could be sited on the parcel based on the lot size and width.
• Title. The City holds the warranty deed.
• Other. A subdivision and comprehensive plan amendment would be required. [Note: The
Comprehensive Plan was amended in 2009.]
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 8c) Page 14
Title: Preliminary and Final Plat – Eldridge Fifth Addition
EXCESS PUBLIC LAND PROCESS
The chronology of public process followed to address the potential use of designated parcels for
consideration of selling for the use of single family homes included:
1. City Council establish Task Force, January 2005
2. Task Force Meetings
a. January 11, 2005
b. January 29, 2005
c. February 8, 2005
d. March 1, 2005
3. Public Open House April 12, 2005
4. Final Task Force Mtg. April 21, 2005
4. Council Tour May 3, 2005
7. Study Session Report May 16, 2005
8. Neighborhood Meetings
a. Wood Lane May 8, 2005 5609 Wood Lane
b. Browndale NA June 14, 2005 4525 Morningside
c. Westwood Hills NA June 16, 2005 1608 Utah Drive
d. Minnikahda Vista NA July 28, 2005 4200 Natchez
e. North Side August 11, 2005 2601 Pennsylvania
f. Fern Hill meeting August 16, 2005 2600 Natchez
g. The Cedar Manor unorganized neighborhood commented they felt it unnecessary to meet
to discuss the possible sale. They feel they have adequately made their concerns known,
and that their input is being considered. They stated they will attend the Council to speak
directly with the Council.
9. Research on Parcels: Geotechnical, surveys, title work, historical June – August 2005
10. City Council Update August 22, 2005
11. Public Open House September 20, 2005
12. City Council Meeting October 17, 2005
13. City Council Meeting November 14, 2005
14. City Council Meeting December 5, 2005
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 8c) Page 15
Title: Preliminary and Final Plat – Eldridge Fifth Addition
Determination by Council on December 5, 2005
The Council considered disposition of 20 vacant publicly owned parcels based on the Excess
Land Task Force recommendations, technical findings and resident input. The Council
determined that 9019 Cedar Lake Road be sold for construction of up to four single family
homes as noted in Resolution No 05-168
RESOLUTION NO. 05-168
CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION DETERMINING THE FUTURE USE OF CERTAIN
EXCESS PUBLIC LANDS
WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park owns certain property the status and use of which
has been reviewed as part of the City’s excess public land process; and
WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park can obtain title to certain other public property
the status and use of which has been reviewed as part of the City’s excess public land process;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that to sell certain parcels and retain others in public
ownership as set forth herein is in the public interest.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
1. Parcel 2. City staff is directed to take the necessary steps to sell the property
located at 2715 Monterey Avenue South; and identified as Parcel 2 on the City’s Excess Public
Lands List for the construction of one single family home. City will retain the easement located
on the parcel for storm water utility purposes.
2. Parcel 6. City staff is directed to take the necessary steps to sell the property
located at 2005 Louisiana Avenue South; and identified as Parcel 6 for the construction of one
single family home.
3. Parcel 10. City staff is directed to seek development proposals and take the
necessary steps to sell to a developer with demonstrated capability, the property located at 9019
Cedar Lake Road; and identified as Parcel 10 for the purpose of developing up to four single
family homes on the site. The site plan shall retain lake visibility from Cedar Lake Road.
4. Parcel 12. If this parcel is not deemed by the City Council to be necessary for use
as an off-leash dog park and retained in public ownership, then City staff is directed to seek
development proposals and take the necessary steps to sell to a developer with demonstrated
capability, the property located at 2601 Pennsylvania Avenue South; and identified as Parcel 12
for the purpose of developing up to four single family homes on the site. Potential buyers shall
be made aware of train noise.
5. Parcel 16. City staff is directed to take the necessary steps to sell the property
located at 7701 Edgebrook Avenue South; and identified as Parcel 16 for the construction of one
single family home, including noise mitigating construction. Potential buyers shall be made
aware of train noise.
6. Parcel 19. City staff is directed to take the necessary steps to sell the property
located at 4200 Natchez Avenue South; and identified as Parcel 19 for the construction of two
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 8c) Page 16
Title: Preliminary and Final Plat – Eldridge Fifth Addition
single family homes. The site plan must accommodate existing drainage. A portion of the site,
at direction of the City Engineer will be retained by the City for storm water purposes.
7. Parcel 7. City staff is directed to seek development proposals and take the
necessary steps to sell to a developer with demonstrated capability, the property located at 13th
Lane West; and identified as Parcel 7 for the construction of a mixed use or live/work
development which would include owner-occupied multi-housing units.
8. Parcel 8. City staff is directed to seek development proposals and take the
necessary steps to sell to a developer with demonstrated capability, the property located at Texas
Avenue and Frontage Road; and identified as Parcel 8 for the construction of up to eleven units
of owner-occupied multi-family housing units. An easement will be required for the existing
Public Works pumping station.
9. Parcels 1, 14 & 15. As to Parcel 1 located at 2914 Inglewood Avenue South,
Parcel 14 located at 6534 Walker Avenue, and Parcel 15 located at 3301 Gorham Avenue, City
staff is directed to take the necessary steps to sell or lease parking lots to adjacent businesses to
be retained as parking lots, consistent with City policies, plans and efforts to manage and lease
its other publicly owned parking facilities and ensure that parking remains available to the
general public at these lots.
10. Parcel 5. City staff is directed to take the necessary steps to sell all or a portion of
the property located at 2015 Louisiana Avenue South; and identified as Parcel 5, to the abutting
property owners. The parcel is not deemed suitable for building and will remain vacant due to
drainage issues on this site.
11. Parcel 9. City staff is directed to take the necessary steps to sell all or a portion of
the property located at 1608 Utah Avenue South; and identified as Parcel 9, to the abutting
owners or group of neighbors. The city will retain an easement for pond access for storm water
purposes. The buildable footprint on this site does not allow for a large home.
12. Parcel 4. City staff is directed to re-evaluate the property located at Cedar Lake
Road and Highway 100; and identified as Parcel 4 for residential development if MnDOT
determines that future conveyance of the parcel to the City is desirable. Up to five homes could
be sited on this parcel.
13. Parcel 20. The City will retain the property located at 3515 Belt Line Boulevard;
and identified as Parcel 20 for future development. Building single family homes should be
considered as a component of future development proposals for this site.
14. Parcel 11. City staff is directed to initiate a planning process with the
neighborhood of Parcel 11 located at 9258 Club Road, to establish the future use of this site,
recognizing that lack of access to the site currently restricts building and park use.
15. Parcel 13. The City will retain the property located at 2812 Zarthan Avenue; and
identified as Parcel 13 for storm water utility purposes.
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 8c) Page 17
Title: Preliminary and Final Plat – Eldridge Fifth Addition
[The following is an excerpt from a City Council written report from October 24, 2011.]
BACKGROUND:
In December 2005, the Council determined that designated publically owned parcels including
9019 Cedar Lake Road, be sold for the purpose of constructing large single family homes. The
approved Resolution 05-168 states that “City staff is directed to seek development proposals and
take the necessary steps to sell to a developer with demonstrated capability, the property located
at 9019 Cedar Lake Road; and identified as Parcel 10 for the purpose of developing up to four
single family homes on the site. The site plan shall retain lake visibility from Cedar Lake Road.”
At the December 2005 meeting the Council also established a sale process and design guidelines
for the parcels and homes to be constructed. Sale was to occur through a bidding process in
which parcels were bid out for the fair market appraised value; with the actual sale to be
administered by the Housing Authority. The buyers were to comply with design guidelines and
design review.
Status of Sale Process
The 9019 Cedar Lake Road parcel was bid out in 2007 with a fair market appraised value of
$400,000 for four single family lots, each valued at $100,000. There were no bidders for this
parcel. Since late 2007 the housing market has continued to struggle and there has been no
interest in this parcel. Recently, Mr. Robert Eldridge of Ridge Creek Custom homes has
expressed interest in purchasing this parcel for the purpose of building two single family homes.
Mr. Robert Eldridge is currently developing five single family homes on the 8849 Minnetonka
Boulevard site.
Instead of building four homes, Mr. Eldridge would propose to plat the parcel for two homes;
one on the western portion and one on the eastern portion of the lot. The soft housing market
and site complications including steep grade, soil conditions requiring fill and closeness to Cedar
Lake Road are reasons he cites for building two homes on this parcel instead of four. Therefore,
his proposal would reflect a purchase offer that reflects the value of two lots, rather than four.
The City Assessor has conducted an updated appraisal of this parcel based on building two
homes on the site. The 2011 appraised value is $152,000 for two lots, each appraised at $76,000.
Staff from Public Works, Park and Recreation and Community Development has reconfirmed
that building two homes on this site is feasible. The parcel would be platted into three lots; a
140’ side lot on the west portion and a 140’ wide lot on the east portion, both of which are for
sale to the developer; and the mid- portion, approximately 195’, to be retained by the City.
Platting 140’ lots would prevent future potential subdivision of the builder’s lots; and City
ownership of the mid-portion of the site will ensure city access to the detention pond for
operation and maintenance purposes.
Design Guideline Requirements
The established design guidelines included a formal design review process that provided design
recommendations to the buyers. The Design Review Committee was composed of an architect,
landscape architect, realtor, Excess Land Task Force member and one neighborhood
representative. Rather than resurrecting the Design Review Committee which has not met in
roughly three years, Mr. Eldridge would still be required to meet the established guidelines, and
would solicit community input on a broader scale. The process would be similar to the
neighborhood process followed for the Eldridge platting process of the 8849 Minnetonka
Boulevard site.
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 8c) Page 18
Title: Preliminary and Final Plat – Eldridge Fifth Addition
9019 Cedar Lake Road Property Information
• City holds title.
• Parcel is unplatted.
• Located in Cedar Manor Neighborhood.
• 50,620 square feet is located above the 100
year flood elevation.
• Zoned for single family residential.
• Comprehensive Plan designation is RL – low
density residential.
• Water and sanitary sewer access from Cedar
Lake Road.
NEXT STEPS:
Mr. Eldridge would work with the Planning Department on the platting and development of the
parcel, including soliciting neighborhood input. A Planning Commission public hearing and
City Council approval would be required for the plat. The City Council would also be given a
Planning Commission recommendation on the proposed plat for its consideration.
9001Westwood Luthern
93302840
9300921292069315910092099219900093018900920489309310920293759339920088202820
2851
2810 26202831
87
1
1
93202806 262489202821
870
1
87
1
5
85452841
870
5
2800
281228012800
8
5
3
7
2542
87108
5
4
8
8
5
4
2
8
5
3
6
2811
2536
2518
2525
260490052512 882485549114 86172524
261089012529 86112530
2511
25308814 25152524
260090208911900426042514
261189052515
911126058900901491008915900089248921880490109001901126152540
2510
2554
262191102501
910190159105260089208914910490212514 860726018910 2534 860125208810 862125399100253391102531 2521
2534
2553890486162550 85252505
2549
2540 2543
2524
25449104 2520
2530CEDAR LAKE RD
28TH ST W BOONE AVE SFLAG AVE SR1
POS
Zoning Classification
POS - Parks & Open Space
R1 - Single Family Residential
R2 - Single Family Residential
R3 - Two-Family Residential
R4 - Multiple-Family Residential
RC - High-Density Multiple-Family Residential
MX - Mixed Use
C1 - Neighborhood Commercial
C2 - General Commercial
O - Office
IP - Industrial Park
IG - General Industrial
$
June 20, 2012´0 200100 Feet
Minnetonka Blvd
Excelsior
Bl
v
d
£¤169
§¨¦394
!(7
100
Louisiana AveEldridge Fifth Addition9019 Cedar Lake RoadPreliminary and Final Plat
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 8c)
Subject: Preliminary and Final Plat – Eldridge Fifth Addition Page 19
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 8c) Subject: Preliminary and Final Plat – Eldridge Fifth AdditionPage 20
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 8c)
Subject: Preliminary and Final Plat – Eldridge Fifth Addition Page 21
City Council Meeting of July 16, 2012 (Item No. 8c) Subject: Preliminary and Final Plat – Eldridge Fifth AdditionPage 22