Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2012/04/02 - ADMIN - Agenda Packets - City Council - Regular
AGENDA APRIL 2, 2012 7:30 p.m. CITY COUNCIL MEETING – Council Chambers 1. Call to Order 1a. Pledge of Allegiance 1b. Roll Call 2. Presentations 2a. ParkTV Local Programming Month Proclamation 3. Approval of Minutes 3a. Study Session Minutes March 12, 2012 3b. Special Study Session Minutes March 19, 2012 3c. City Council Meeting Minutes March 19, 2012 4. Approval of Agenda and Items on Consent Calendar NOTE: The Consent Calendar lists those items of business which are considered to be routine and/or which need no discussion. Consent items are acted upon by one motion. If discussion is desired by either a Councilmember or a member of the audience, that item may be moved to an appropriate section of the regular agenda for discussion. The items for the Consent Calendar are listed on the last page of the Agenda. Recommended Action: Motion to approve the Agenda as presented and items listed on the Consent Calendar; and to waive reading of all resolutions and ordinances. (Alternatively: Motion to add or remove items from the agenda, or move items from Consent Calendar to regular agenda for discussion.) 5. Boards and Commissions 5a. Appointment of Citizen Representative to Boards and Commissions. 6. Public Hearings -- None 7. Requests, Petitions, and Communications from the Public -- None 8. Resolutions, Ordinances, Motions and Discussion Items 8a. Recreational Fire Permit Fee Recommended Action: Motion to Adopt Resolution approving a Recreational Fire Permit fee of $25.00. 8b. Hoigaard Village – PUD Major Amendment for a Modification to the Adagio Building Recommended Action: Motion to Adopt Resolution approving the Major Amendment to the Planned Unit Development. 8c. SWLRT Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC) – Alternate Appointments Recommended Action: Motion to Appoint Julie Williams as an alternate member of the SWLRT CAC. Discuss assigning a priority to the Alternates for filling in when members are absent. 9. Communication Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. To make arrangements, please call the Administration Department at 952/924-2525 (TDD 952/924-2518) at least 96 hours in advance of meeting. Meeting of April 2, 2012 City Council Agenda CONSENT CALENDAR 4a. Approve Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance amending the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code Section 10-1 establishing ward boundary lines, and to Adopt Resolution establishing precincts and polling places 4b. Adopt Resolution authorizing the special assessment for the repair of the water service line at 3205 Cavell Lane, St. Louis Park, MN - P.I.D. 18-117-21-24-0014 4c. Accept Donation from the Minnesota Resuscitation Consortium Grant in the amount of $5,000 for community hands only CPR training 4d. Adopt Resolution in Support of the 2012 TED Grant Request for the Highway 7 / Louisiana Avenue Interchange project, Project No. 2012-0100 4e. Adopt Resolution establishing a special assessment for the installation of a fire suppression sprinkler system at 7317 West Lake Street, St. Louis Park, MN 4f. Adopt Resolution accepting this report, establishing and approving plans and specifications, and authorizing advertisement for bids for the roof replacement at various park buildings damaged in the 2011 hail storm 4g. Adopt Resolution authorizing the special assessment for the repair of the sewer service line at 7429 Edgebrook Drive, St. Louis Park, MN, - P.I.D. 20-117-21-21-0073 4h. Approve for filing Vendor Claims 4i. Approve for filing Housing Authority Minutes February 8, 2012 4j. Approve for filing Human Rights Commission Minutes February 21, 2012 St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority and regular City Council meetings are carried live on Civic TV cable channel 17 and replays are frequent; check www.parktv.org for the schedule. The meetings are also streamed live on the internet at www.parktv.org, and saved for Video on Demand replays. The agenda is posted on Fridays on the official city bulletin board in the lobby of City Hall and on the text display on Civic TV cable channel 17. The agenda and full packet are available by noon on Friday on the city’s website. Meeting Date: April 2, 2012 Agenda Item #: 2a Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance Presentation Other: Proclamation EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other: Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other: TITLE: ParkTV Local Programming Month Proclamation. RECOMMENDED ACTION: The Mayor to read the Proclamation recognizing April 2012 as ParkTV Local Programming Month. POLICY CONSIDERATION: None. BACKGROUND: Each year, the city’s Information Resources Department cablecasts hundreds of hours of recorded or live original programming, events, sports, news, talk shows, performances and more. In addition to being cablecast, the city’s Comcast cable channels and programming are available via live stream on the city website or on demand on the city website. Content is also now being made available on Vimeo and YouTube, and distributed through our social networking sites. In addition to the city’s dedicated staff, this programming is made possible by hundreds of volunteers each year who contribute or create their own programming for cablecast on our public access channels. Our ParkTV On Location staff is further supported by volunteer announcers and crew members for many of the sporting events covered each year. These volunteers range from teenagers trying it for the first time to adults who have been volunteering for 30 or more years. This year, we’re taking the opportunity to recognize all of these individuals and their commitment to local programming. A recognition event will be held on April 5th, 2012 to kick off “ParkTV Local Programming Month” to recognize the volunteers and contributors, share highlights of some of their programming from the last year, and encourage networking between these many talented community members. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: None. VISION CONSIDERATION: This activity is consistent with the City Council’s Strategic Direction that St. Louis Park is committed to being connected and engaged. Attachments: Proclamation Prepared by: Jamie Zwilling, Communications Coordinator Reviewed by: Clint Pires, Chief Information Officer Approved by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director City Council Meeting April 2, 2012 (Item No. 2a) Page 2 Subject: ParkTV Local Programming Month Proclamation PROCLAMATION ParkTV Local Programming Month WHEREAS, local access cable television programming is an important resource provided in our community and an important part of our residents’ everyday lives; and WHEREAS, local programming supports the city’s Vision strategic direction to remain a connected and engaged community; and WHEREAS, more than 100 community members contributed content, time and services in 2011 to the city’s public access programming; and WHEREAS, the ParkTV On Location staff was fully supported by volunteer announcers and crew members, NOW THEREFORE, let it be known that the Mayor and City Council of the City of St. Louis Park wish to proclaim the month of April 2012 as “ParkTV Local Programming Month” and call upon all citizens and civic organizations to acquaint themselves with the quality programming produced by dozens of dedicated residents and staff, and to recognize the contributions that they make every day to discovering, recording, reporting, editing, cablecasting, and web streaming the stories and events that make St. Louis Park such a remarkable community. WHEREFORE, I set my hand and cause the Great Seal of the City of St. Louis Park to be affixed this 2nd day of April, 2012. _____________________________________ Jeffrey W. Jacobs, Mayor Meeting Date: April 2, 2012 Agenda Item #: 3a UNOFFICIAL MINUTES CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA MARCH 12, 2012 The meeting convened at 6:30 p.m. Councilmembers present: Mayor Jeff Jacobs (arrived at 6:56 p.m.), Steve Hallfin, Anne Mavity, Julia Ross, Susan Sanger, Sue Santa, and Jake Spano. Councilmembers absent: None. Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), City Clerk (Ms. Stroth), Organizational Development Coordinator (Ms. Goldberg), Director of Public Works (Mr. Rardin), Communications Coordinator (Mr. Zwilling), Utilities Superintendent (Mr. Anderson), Environmental Coordinator (Mr. Vaughan), Public Works Coordinator (Mr. Merkley), Public Works Admin Specialist (Ms. Hansen), City Assessor (Mr. Bultema), and Recording Secretary (Ms. Hughes). 1. Future Study Session Agenda Planning – March 19 and March 26, 2012 Mr. Harmening presented the proposed special study session agenda for March 19, 2012, and the proposed study session agenda for March 26, 2012. Mayor Pro Tem Sanger requested that the discussion regarding the Business Park Zoning District include a discussion regarding the City’s plans to spot zone the Business Park Zoning District versus zoning larger areas with this classification. Councilmember Ross requested that Council discuss Eliot School and commission appointments this evening. 2. Redistricting Options Ms. Stroth presented the staff report and two options for redistricting. She advised that the City Charter requires ward boundaries to be adopted by April 3, 2012. She stated that wards must be bounded by precincts and cannot cross legislative boundaries. She indicated that the City will remain in the 5th Congressional District and the Legislative District was renumbered to 46. She reviewed the criteria used for preparing the redistricting options and noted that both options are well within the 5% deviation guideline. She presented Option 1 and Option 2 depicting ward boundaries and precinct locations and noted that Option 1 keeps the neighborhoods intact in each ward. She then reviewed the advantages and disadvantages of Option 1 and Option 2. Councilmember Ross expressed support for Option 1 and stated she was pleased to see that Option 1 does not split neighborhoods, the lines are cleaner, and overall, Option 1 makes the most sense. Councilmember Mavity and Mayor Pro Tem Sanger agreed. Councilmember Santa indicated it would be nice to have a polling place in precinct 9 that does not require crossing Highway 7 which can be a barrier for some people. She added there are City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 3a) Page 2 Subject: Study Session Minutes of March 12, 2012 some residents in South Oak Hill who are used to walking to their polling place so this will be a shift for them and she would like to minimize change as much as possible. It was the consensus of the City Council to choose Option 1 as the preferred redistricting layout. Councilmember Mavity expressed concern that some polls already seem to be at capacity with no room for growth, particularly related to the Rec Center. Ms. Stroth indicated that by changing the precinct boundaries, the proposed voters for the Rec Center polling location is reduced by approximately 1,000 voters to accommodate the projected future growth in this precinct. She stated that the public hearing and first reading will take place on March 19th with the second reading on April 2nd, and voters would be notified in July of their precinct location. She added the City will educate voters on the redistricting changes and the new boundaries will be effective at the time of the Primary Election on August 14th. Councilmember Sanger requested that the Councilmembers send an email to the various neighborhood leaders letting them know who their new Councilmember is following adoption of the redistricting plan. Mr. Harmening expressed thanks and appreciation to Ms. Stroth, Ms. Midura, Mr. Graham, Mr. Jones, and all the staff members who worked on the redistricting plan. 3. Storm Water/Surface Water Management Mr. Rardin presented the staff report. He indicated the City’s storm water program utilizes a natural system of ponds designed to hold back water and also to provide natural treatment of water as it goes through the community. He stated that the various regulations require the City to evaluate its water systems through TMDLs and utilizes best management practices to get the best treatment of the water. He discussed the Barr maintenance and rehabilitation program that deals with the City’s storm water system and noted this study focuses not so much on quantity but more so on water quality, total suspended solids, and total phosphorous. He advised that the PCA has begun to revise its rules and regulations on NPDES as well as the rules and regulations related to TMDLs; as a result, the CIP which was generated by Barr should be put on hold pending the rules revision. Councilmember Mavity stated that Bass Lake Preserve is listed as a wetland and an aquatic plant survey would be of no benefit. She indicated that at one time, Bass Lake was listed as an 80 acre lake and questioned whether all lakes would become wetlands over time due to silt and sediment. She stated that Bass Lake is a public access entirely and did not feel the residents living near the lake should pay for improvements. She expressed frustration about how the City is approaching this and stated she felt like the City was dismissing Bass Lake because it is a wetland. Mr. Rardin indicated that Bass Lake has wetland vegetation and an aquatic plant survey is aimed at bodies of water such as Twin Lakes where there is submergent vegetation. He added that the designation of Bass Lake as a wetland is not done by the City and is designated a lake by the DNR. Councilmember Mavity indicated the City is currently doing nothing to manage Bass Lake and wanted the City to be more proactive in managing it. She urged the City to consider how Bass City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 3a) Page 3 Subject: Study Session Minutes of March 12, 2012 Lake functions as an asset to the community and to consider what can be done to make sure it remains useful and functional. Mr. Harmening stated that further information can be provided to Council regarding what it would take to reverse the natural cycle of what is happening in Bass Lake. Mr. Vaughan noted that Bass Lake is functioning as a wetland as part of a natural process and is not functioning as a lake for storm water purposes. Councilmember Sanger indicated it appears that Councilmember Mavity is talking about the value of water as a community asset and a quality of life issue, which applies to more than just Bass Lake. She suggested that Council have a separate discussion about the value of water to the community in general, in addition to the technical storm water, flood management, and other technical purposes. Councilmember Mavity stated this could be a topic for discussion by the environmental commission. Councilmember Sanger requested further information regarding the Twin Lakes aquatic study and what happens after the study is completed, particularly related to the perpetual problem with the smell at Twin Lakes. She stated she fundamentally disagreed that homeowners near a lake should bear the cost of fixing up a lake that is a DNR lake and felt this goes to the same issue as community sidewalks. Mr. Harmening stated there is a functional purpose for lakes, whether man-made or natural, to manage the City’s storm water and the City’s policy has been to pay those costs to make sure they function to control flooding and the like. He suggested that next steps for Bass Lake include providing Council with additional information on what it would take to reverse the trend of what is happening with Bass Lake. He suggested Council also discuss aesthetics and recreational uses of the City’s water bodies and to look at possible neighborhood pond distinctions. He added staff would also provide information on costs to treat a body of water. Councilmember Sanger requested that information also be provided about the benefits of treating bodies of water and whether it does any good. Councilmember Santa requested that Council discuss the approach to wetlands, including Minnehaha Creek, not only for storm water purposes, but the larger plan as it relates to the Watershed District and the State. 4. Solid Waste Collection Program and Services Mr. Rardin presented the staff report and research information related to Best Management Practices. Councilmember Hallfin expressed support for a Styrofoam ban. Councilmember Sanger felt that the program should not distinguish between individuals and businesses or institutions. She stated the underlying policy question should be what is City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 3a) Page 4 Subject: Study Session Minutes of March 12, 2012 appropriate to be recycled in this community and how the City can make that work for different types of properties in the community. Councilmember Ross stated it will be important to encourage all residents to participate in recycling while recognizing it may or may not work for everybody but to provide vehicles for those that will recycle. Councilmember Mavity asked if the City’s development guidelines require buildings to have a designated recycling space. Mayor Jacobs agreed the City should mandate that developers include recycling space during the design phase of projects. Councilmember Sanger stated that this should also be a requirement of getting TIF money from the City. Councilmember Mavity stated she wanted to be absolutely certain that what is done at the City level gets to the right end goal and to make certain that recycling gets to recycling and not thrown in the garbage. Councilmember Sanger agreed and stated that the City should require contractors who are responding to RFPs to provide information on rates of contamination. She indicated she was surprised to see the recommendation that the City go to a single sort recycling system. Mr. Rardin stated this goes to environmental stewardship and agreed there is some waste diversion with a single sort system but you can get up to three times as much recycling. He added that a single sort system makes it more convenient to recycle and keeps costs down. Councilmember Mavity stated the report was useful and encouraged the City to be as progressive as possible and to provide as many incentives as possible to encourage recycling. Councilmember Spano stated that the recommended materials list is a great list that should be sent to residents. Councilmember Sanger agreed that Styrofoam should be banned and suggested adding plastic bags and plastic drink bottles. Councilmember Ross suggested the City do more education including putting something on public access on how to get rid of junk mail and recycling CFL bulbs and batteries. Councilmember Spano stated he would like to see what some of the neighboring communities are doing as it relates to recycling. Councilmember Sanger stated that the City should also look at what it charges for residential customers and possibly revise its rate structure to make it cost more to throw away versus recycle. It was the consensus of the City Council to direct staff to provide further information to Council regarding changes to the current solid waste program including budget and staffing impacts. City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 3a) Page 5 Subject: Study Session Minutes of March 12, 2012 5. 2012 Real Estate Valuation Report Mr. Bultema presented the staff report and 2012 valuation report for taxes payable in 2013. He presented a summary of the City’s 2012 assessment roll compared to 2011 for all property types. He reviewed total housing units in the City and sale transactions from 2009-2011 showing traditional sales versus foreclosure sales and stated this past year, the City ranked 45th out of 173 MLS jurisdictions with one half of sales in the metro area being distress sales. He noted the City was at 39.7% for foreclosure sales in 2011 and staff is continuing to watch this closely. He added the City’s housing division has been proactive in its outreach to single family homeowners facing foreclosure. He reviewed median sales prices from 2009-2011 and stated the market is currently in a state of flux with the vast majority of adjustments in the lower bracket pricing. He then reviewed sales transactions for single family homes, condos and townhomes, and apartments as well as overall market value change information for all property types. He discussed the appeal process and the role of the Local Board of Appeal and Equalization, noting that the Board is scheduled to convene on April 9, 2012. 6. Planning Commission 2011 Annual Report/2012 Work Plan Mr. Harmening presented the staff report. Councilmember Mavity suggested that as part of the work plan of each of the City’s boards and commissions, a section be added to provide an opportunity for a board or commission to bring to Council’s attention any policy issue that a commission might want to discuss with Council. Councilmember Sanger suggested that a joint meeting be held with Council, BOZA, and the Planning Commission to discuss the new variance law. It was the consensus of the City Council to schedule a meeting with the Planning Commission. 7. Communications/Meeting Check-In (Verbal) Commission Appointments Mayor Jacobs stated that an individual has come forward who wants to serve on a commission where her father already serves. He asked if Council has a policy regarding nepotism and also whether a person can sit on two commissions. Mr. Harmening agreed to bring back language for Council consideration that states a person cannot sit on two commissions. Councilmember Ross stated she did not think it would look good to have two family members serving on a commission. Councilmember Sanger agreed. Councilmember Spano stated the policy needs to clearly define “family member.” Mr. Harmening agreed to provide policy language clarifying family members serving on a commission. City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 3a) Page 6 Subject: Study Session Minutes of March 12, 2012 Eliot School Mr. Harmening advised that the Eliot School building is empty and the School District has informed the City that the developer they had is pulling out of the project. He stated it is possible the building might sit vacant for a long time and asked if Council would like to look into demolition of the building. Councilmember Mavity felt it would be in the City’s best interest to demolish the building. Councilmember Santa stated it might make the property more saleable. It was the consensus of the City Council to further explore the possibility of demolishing the Eliot School building and work with the School District regarding repayment terms. The meeting adjourned at 9:54 p.m. Written Reports provided and documented for recording purposes only: 8. Vision Check-In Follow-Up ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Nancy Stroth, City Clerk Jeff Jacobs, Mayor Meeting Date: April 2, 2012 Agenda Item #: 3b UNOFFICIAL MINUTES CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL STUDY SESSION ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA MARCH 19, 2012 The meeting convened at 6:30 p.m. Councilmembers present: Mayor Jeff Jacobs, Steve Hallfin, Anne Mavity, Julia Ross, Susan Sanger, Sue Santa, and Jake Spano (arrived at 6:43 p.m.). Councilmembers absent: None. Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), Chief Information Officer (Mr. Pires), Communications Coordinator (Mr. Zwilling), Web Coordinator (Mr. Huber), and Recording Secretary (Ms. Hughes). 1. 2012-2013 Communications Plan Mr. Pires presented the staff report and acknowledged the significant efforts of Mr. Zwilling, Mr. Huber, and the rest of the Communications staff. Mr. Zwilling presented the Communications Plan and advised that next steps will focus on development of a mobile-ready website and development of a strategic plan for Westwood Hills Nature Center. He stated that statistics show most people will be accessing the internet off their mobile phones and tablet devices over the next couple of years and the website has been redesigned to make it more adaptable no matter what device people are using. Mr. Huber reviewed the City’s current website and presented the redesigned website. He also reviewed website traffic sources for the last twelve months and stated 74% of traffic comes from search engines and only 35% of users see the City’s home page because these users enter the website through links. He indicated the new website design includes different ways to connect with the City, e.g., Facebook, video channels, or a “contact us” link, and the City’s telephone number will be included in the upper right corner of every page. He stated the menu on the left side has been categorized to provide information on “who we are” and “what we provide” and the page also includes a new tab entitled “I want to,” intended to assist with navigation on the website. He indicated the middle section of the webpage includes departments that will allow users to scroll through the page. He reviewed the content that will be included on the bottom of every page including upcoming events, quick links, recently updated sections, and related links. Councilmember Spano asked if it would be possible to have the middle area scroll automatically because some people may not see the arrow that will take them to additional information on the page. He added that this scrolling motion will attract people’s attention. Mr. Zwilling noted that the information bar at the top of the page will follow users down every page they visit. Mr. Huber then showed how the website will be viewed on a smartphone with content resized to fit a mobile device. Councilmember Ross asked if the website will automatically be updated if people have saved the City’s old website in their favorites. City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 3b) Page 2 Subject: Special Study Session Minutes of March 19, 2012 Mr. Zwilling explained that the updated website will mirror the City’s current site and the links will stay the same. He added that all content will be reorganized on the new website and will include any necessary redirects. He discussed the City’s process of updating the website content and indicated representatives from most departments are responsible for updating content. He added that emails are sent to department representatives reminding them to update their content to make sure it is current, with nothing over six months old. He indicated that the search function was revamped a few months ago and if someone typed in freight rail, they would see a list of every type of document associated with freight rail. He then discussed the strategic communications plan for Westwood Hills Nature Center, which was identified through Vision as an important component of the City’s branding. He advised the plan includes a strategic planning session with the Westwood Hills staff, volunteers, and community members to develop a plan with them and give them the necessary tools to market strategically in a variety of ways. Councilmember Mavity stated the guiding principles serve the City well and she was proud of the work being done by the Communications staff to stay ahead of the game. Councilmember Santa asked if the website will include information on how people can communicate a problem or provide feedback without making a phone call. Mr. Zwilling replied that the City is currently working on a way for residents to submit a request or complaint on the website, which would be directed to a staff member and tracked by the City to make sure the request or complaint is being handled in a timely manner. He added that further information will be provided to Council when this program is available. Councilmember Mavity asked that the program include a mechanism for notifying a Councilmember if a concern is raised in their ward. Councilmember Sanger asked that the program also include deadlines for responding to complaints. She stated that while more and more communications are being directed to the website, it will be important not to lose sight of other ways to alert people that there are things they should pay attention to. She suggested that the City find ways to send notices electronically rather than through regular mail as a way to save money. Mayor Jacobs indicated that the statutes regulate how some notices are sent and/or published in the newspaper. Councilmember Santa stated that it will be important to remember that a number of residents are not connected to the internet or are uncomfortable getting their information via the computer. Mr. Pires stated a 2010 survey indicated that 20% of the community uses the web as the main source of information about the City, which is a 100% increase from 2008. Councilmember Spano stated that the City should be able to convert all its mailings to an electronic format and there are legal pathways to do this, including Zoombox run by Gov Delivery. He stated that St. Paul and Minneapolis are currently conducting a pilot using this program to convert mailings to electronic format. City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 3b) Page 3 Subject: Special Study Session Minutes of March 19, 2012 Mr. Pires stated that the Park Alert system is another tool available that could be used to call, text, or email residents with information about community events and updates. He added the City will need to be careful to not overuse the Park Alert system. Councilmember Spano commended the City on its exhaustive social media policy. He stated that city websites frequently require users to know what department governs a particular activity and stated it will be important to look at this from the user’s perspective and how they are coming to the website looking for information. Councilmember Sanger suggested having a section that includes contact information for specific questions. Councilmember Mavity asked if the website will include different languages. Mr. Zwilling stated that staff is currently looking at adding different languages and this will require an additional investment by the City. 2. Boards & Commissions Appointments Mr. Harmening presented the staff report. Councilmember Santa noted that there have been people serving on both the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission and CEAC. Councilmember Sanger suggested that a written policy be adopted that states the City Council will not appoint a person to serve on more than one board or commission concurrently. Councilmember Ross agreed with Councilmember Sanger. Councilmember Sanger stated that Council asked Ms. Rashmi Seneviratne to think about her preference and to get back to Council. Councilmember Spano stated he was amenable to not allowing people to serve on two boards concurrently, but expressed concern that the current rules do not preclude someone from serving on more than one commission. He added that Ms. Seneviratne earlier requested information from the City about multiple commission appointments and the City told her she could serve on more than one commission, but now Council is changing its policy. He expressed concern about consistency and stated he would prefer to let Ms. Seneviratne serve on two commissions and to adopt a revised policy going forward. Mayor Jacobs suggested that Council wait until Ms. Seneviratne gets back to the City before making a final determination. Councilmember Ross indicated that it is sometimes difficult to find youth commissioners to serve and she would be willing to make an exception with respect to immediate family members serving on the same commission only as it relates to youth commissioners. She indicated if Ms. Foulkes’s father goes off the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission, this Commission would be a great place for her to serve. City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 3b) Page 4 Subject: Special Study Session Minutes of March 19, 2012 Councilmember Mavity stated that Council should evaluate each application on its own merits and did not feel that a familial relationship should prevent Ms. Foulkes from serving on the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission. Councilmember Sanger indicated the issue is not about whether Ms. Foulkes would be a great fit, but whether there appears to be undue influence. Councilmember Santa agreed that making an exception with respect to youth commissioners would be appropriate. Councilmember Hallfin felt that Council should appoint Ms. Seneviratne to the Police Advisory Commission and appoint Sarah Foulkes and Elizabeth Griffin to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission. Councilmember Sanger suggested appointing Elizabeth Griffin and David Erickson to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission. She also suggested Council communicate to Ms. Foulkes that it would like to appoint her to a different commission and after her father comes off the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission, she can then serve on that Commission. Mayor Jacobs and Councilmembers Mavity and Hallfin expressed support for appointing Ms. Foulkes to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission. Councilmember Spano stated that nothing precludes Council from revising its policies and urged Council to let the issue play itself out with respect to Ms. Foulkes, particularly since Council feels she is well qualified to serve on the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission. He expressed concern that Council is excluding a candidate from service based on what someone might interpret. Councilmember Sanger respectfully disagreed and stated she felt very strongly that appointing two family members to the same commission would be a mistake. Mayor Jacobs requested that staff contact Mr. Erickson and Mr. Hall to see if they are interested in serving on the Police Advisory Commission. He added that Council also needs to rank the alternates serving on the SWLRT Citizen Advisory Committee. It was the consensus of the City Council to appoint Ms. Kottke as the first alternate and Ms. Johnston-Madison as the second alternate on the SWLRT Citizen Advisory Committee. The meeting adjourned at 7:32 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Nancy Stroth, City Clerk Jeff Jacobs, Mayor Meeting Date: April 2, 2012 Agenda Item #: 3c UNOFFICIAL MINUTES CITY COUNCIL MEETING ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA MARCH 19, 2012 1. Call to Order Mayor Jacobs called the meeting to order at 7:33 p.m. Councilmembers present: Mayor Jeff Jacobs, Steve Hallfin, Anne Mavity, Julia Ross, Susan Sanger, Sue Santa, and Jake Spano. Councilmembers absent: None. Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), City Clerk (Ms. Stroth), Housing Program Coordinator (Ms. Larsen), Planning/Zoning Supervisor (Ms. McMonigal), Assistant Zoning Administrator (Mr. Morrison), City Engineer (Mr. Brink), Engineering Project Manager (Mr. Olson), Director of Community Development (Mr. Locke), and Recording Secretary (Ms. Hughes). 1a. Pledge of Allegiance 1c. Roll Call 2. Presentations - None 3. Approval of Minutes 3a. Study Session Meeting Minutes February 27, 2012 The minutes were approved as presented. 3b. Special Study Session Meeting Minutes March 5, 2012 The minutes were approved as presented. 3c. City Council Meeting Minutes March 5, 2012 Councilmember Mavity requested that the third sentence in the first full paragraph on page six be revised to state “She stated there are over 500 state laws and 1,000 federal laws that convey benefits to individuals based on their marital status and as long as the government is providing benefits for marriage and at the same time denying the ability to access those benefits, it becomes a City issue and the City has an interest in making sure it is upholding its values and is not discriminating.” Councilmember Santa requested that the fourth paragraph under agenda item 8a on page 3 be revised to state “Councilmember Santa advised she would abstain from voting due to her employment with ING which causes a conflict of interest.” City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 3c) Page 2 Subject: City Council Meeting Minutes of March 19, 2012 Councilmember Spano requested that the spelling of Ms. Pam Rykken’s last name be corrected in the third paragraph on page 5. Councilmember Sanger said Karmit Bulman’s name on page 5 needed to be corrected. The minutes were approved as amended. 4. Approval of Agenda and Items on Consent Calendar NOTE: The Consent Calendar lists those items of business which are considered to be routine and/or which need no discussion. Consent items are acted upon by one motion. If discussion is desired by either a Councilmember or a member of the audience, that item may be moved to an appropriate section of the regular agenda for discussion. 4a. Authorize the Mayor and City Manager to enter into an Inspection Services Mutual Aid Agreement with the City of Minnetonka. 4b. Approve Amendment No. 4 to Contract 142-08 which will provide additional engineering consulting services for preparing a Remedial Action Plan (RAP) as part of Phase 4 activities (Final Design) and extends the contract time period by one year for the Highway 7 / Louisiana Avenue Interchange project, Project No. 2012-0100. 4c. Adopt Resolution No. 12-046 identifying the need for Metropolitan Council Transit Oriented Development (TOD) funding, authorizing an application for grant funds, and amending Resolution 12-038. 4d. Adopt Resolution No. 12-047 authorizing a PUD Development Agreement with WEA, LLC related to a multifamily housing development at 5310 16th Street West and release of the property from two previous agreements. 4e. Adopt Resolution No 12-048 supporting the EDA’s application for a Hennepin County Environmental Response Fund (ERF) grant on behalf of Bader Development’s e2 project. 4f. Approve for Filing Vendor Claims. 4g. Approve for Filing Planning Commission Minutes February 1, 2012. 4h. Approve for Filing Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting Minutes December 7, 2011. Mayor Jacobs noted that the City Council will take action this evening with respect to Board and Commission appointments. It was moved by Councilmember Mavity, seconded by Councilmember Santa, to approve the Agenda and items listed on the Consent Calendar; and to waive reading of all resolutions and ordinances. The motion passed 7-0. 5. Boards and Commissions Councilmember Sanger indicated she had no problem with either Ms. Griffin or Ms. Foulkes, but expressed concern regarding Ms. Foulkes because her father currently serves as a member of the same commission. She stated she felt strongly that the City’s boards and commissions should not include more than one member of the same immediate City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 3c) Page 3 Subject: City Council Meeting Minutes of March 19, 2012 family or household because it can lead to issues of perception of unfairness in the community. She added she would have no problem appointing Ms. Foulkes after her father is off the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission. She requested that the commission appointments be voted on in two separate actions. Councilmember Mavity indicated the City does not currently have a policy in place that would prohibit this and Council would like to have a discussion regarding this issue in the future. It was moved by Councilmember Mavity, seconded by Councilmember Santa, to appoint Elizabeth Griffin to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission. The motion passed 7-0. It was moved by Councilmember Mavity, seconded by Councilmember Santa, to appoint Sarah Foulkes to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission. The motion passed 6-1 (Councilmember Sanger opposed). 6. Public Hearings 6a. Public Hearing and First Reading of Ordinance Amending Ward Boundaries Ms. Stroth presented the staff report and proposed plan for amending ward boundaries. She explained the redistricting process occurs after every ten year Census and the City will remain in the 5th Congressional District and the Senate districts have been renumbered to 46a and 46b. She presented the ward population deviation and noted the resulting deviation is well within the 5% deviation allowed. She then presented the redistricting plan wards and precincts, noting the City will now have 16 precincts, one less than previously, and presented the changes in wards by neighborhood and precinct boundary guidelines with proposed polling locations. She indicated the redistricting plan must be submitted to the County and State by April 3rd and notices will be mailed to residents in June indicating voting precincts for all registered voters. Mayor Jacobs expressed thanks to Ms. Stroth and her staff for their efforts in preparing the plan for amending ward boundaries. Mayor Jacobs opened the public hearing. No speakers were present. Mayor Jacobs closed the public hearing. Councilmember Santa urged residents to keep in mind that some of the precinct numbers may have changed for existing polling locations. Councilmember Sanger stated that she has worked with the Blackstone and Cedarhurst neighborhoods for 16 years and she was saddened to not have them as part of Ward 1 anymore, but was confident that Councilmember Ross will do a great job. She added she was looking forward to working with the Triangle neighborhood. City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 3c) Page 4 Subject: City Council Meeting Minutes of March 19, 2012 It was moved by Councilmember Santa, seconded by Councilmember Mavity, to approve First Reading of Ordinance Amending Chapter 10: Elections - Establishing Ward Boundaries Following the 2010 U.S. Census and to set Second Reading for April 2, 2012. The motion passed 7-0. 7. Requests, Petitions, and Communications from the Public – None 8. Resolutions, Ordinances, Motions and Discussion Items 8a. Holy Family Academy Expansion – Preliminary/Final Plat and Conditional Use Permit. Resolutions No. 12-049 and No. 12-050 Mr. Morrison presented the staff report and proposed Preliminary and Final Plat and Conditional Use Permit. He explained the project will be completed in two phases and Phase 1 includes combining the properties and grading the site, scheduled to be done during May. He noted that Phase 2 does not yet have a timeline for completion and includes expansion of the school, expansion of the parking lot and drop-off areas, and storm water improvements. He stated that a neighborhood advocacy team was formed that has been in close contact with Holy Family Academy regarding the proposed improvements and referenced the summary of neighborhood meetings contained in the agenda. He presented the concept plan and explained that the proposal will take the existing Holy Family property and add four more properties, replatting it into one lot called Lot 1, Block 1, Holy Family Addition. He noted that a portion of the unplatted parcel will be dedicated back to the City for right-of-way purposes. He explained the Conditional Use Permit will be used to expand the existing educational use facility and allow the applicant to bring in approximately 1,600 cubic yards of material. He indicated all Phase 1 improvements lie south of the existing parking lot and including construction of a basketball court, a fenced-in grade school play yard, and a flat green area for recreational use. He stated that concerns were raised by the neighbors regarding the grade changes and a swale has been added across the south property line to capture water and redirect it towards Alabama Avenue. He described the truck routes leaving and coming on to the site and indicated City Code allows construction activities to occur between 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. Monday-Friday and between 9:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. on weekends; however, the City Council can alter those times because of the proximity to a residential area. He presented the landscaping plan which provides 11 trees to be planted in Phase 1 and the remaining trees will be added during Phase 2. He stated that a six foot privacy fence will be installed along the south property line and the City has required that the fence terminate five feet prior to the right-of-way and that the fence be reduced to 3.5 feet adjacent to the front yards. He then introduced several representatives from Holy Family Academy. Councilmember Sanger asked if the driveway aprons will be removed and curb and gutter replaced in the location where the houses are removed. Mr. Morrison replied that four driveway aprons will be removed and the curb and gutter restored. City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 3c) Page 5 Subject: City Council Meeting Minutes of March 19, 2012 Councilmember Sanger requested that condition 4a of the Conditional Use Permit be amended to require that there be no construction activity after 7:00 p.m. rather than 10:00 p.m. She expressed thanks to Holy Family Academy for including the neighbors in their planning process and listening to their concerns. She added she regrets losing four single family homes and hoped there was a way the homes could be moved to other locations. Councilmember Spano agreed that construction activity should be limited and asked Holy Family Academy to be respectful of the neighborhood. He requested assurance that Council will have a further opportunity to review and revise Phase 2 when Holy Family Academy is read to proceed with that phase of the project. Mr. Morrison replied that all Phase 2 plans for construction will be submitted to the City Council for approval. Councilmember Mavity indicated that Holy Family has been a long-standing member of the community and she shared Councilmember Sanger’s concern about losing four single family homes. She stated it is an important priority for the City to retain and build new single family homes and she had mixed feelings about this proposal. Councilmember Hallfin stated that Holy Family Academy owns the four single family homes and questioned what would happen if Council does not approve their request. Mr. Morrison explained that any property owner can take down their house and Holy Family Academy would have issues to address if it wanted to expand the school because it would not have received approval for consolidation of its properties. Ms. McMonigal stated that a Conditional Use Permit is a permitted use that can include conditions imposed by the City and Holy Family Academy is allowed to do this under the Zoning Code. She added it is difficult for the City to say no to their request since this is a permitted use with conditions. It was moved by Councilmember Sanger, seconded by Councilmember Ross, to adopt Resolution No. 12-049 giving approval for Preliminary and Final Plat of Holy Family Addition. The motion passed 6-1 (Councilmember Hallfin opposed). It was moved by Councilmember Sanger, seconded by Councilmember Ross, to adopt Resolution No. 12-050 Granting Conditional Use Permit Under Section 36-164(d)(4) of the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code Relating to Zoning to Permit an Expansion of the Educational Facility (Holy Family Academy) for Property Zoned R-2 Single Family Residential District Located at 5925 Lake Street West, as amended to modify Condition 4a requiring no construction activity after 7:00 p.m. seven days a week. The motion passed 6-1 (Councilmember Hallfin opposed). City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 3c) Page 6 Subject: City Council Meeting Minutes of March 19, 2012 8b. Community Energy Services (CES)/Green Remodeling Home Improvement Program. Resolution No. 12-051 Ms. Larsen presented the staff report and explained that the CES program is intended to help residents save money and energy and uses City funds leveraged with funding from CenterPoint Energy and Xcel Energy. She then introduced Mr. Carl Nelson, Program and Policy Manager for the Center for Energy and Environment (CEE). Mr. Carl Nelson stated that CEE has been a leader in implementing energy-efficiency programs for over 30 years with the goal of making saving energy easy and fun, as well as focusing on a range of cost efficient energy saving opportunities achievable by all households that get results, including reduced energy bills and less carbon emissions. He reviewed the services provided and indicated 80% of the program is funded by CenterPoint Energy and Xcel Energy. He explained that a series of community workshops will be held to provide education on no-cost and low-cost ways to save energy. He stated that residents have the options of 3 levels of home energy visits. The $50 energy visit includes conservation information and installation of materials valued at fifty dollars, including CFLs, door weather-stripping, low flow shower heads and more. The $70 visit includes installation of conservation materials, a detailed analysis of energy use, blower door and combustion safety tests and recommendations for improvements. He noted the comparable energy audit offered by CenterPoint costs $100 and does not include installation of materials. He noted residents can request the home visit premium audit for $100 which includes all of the above plus an estimate for completing work and an infrared camera inspection after the work has been completed. He noted that CEE also provides a home energy score which gives a visual representation of a home’s energy efficiency level and this is only available through CES. He stated that CEE provides training and certification for its participating contractors in this program and performs audit control checks. He indicated that CEE has done approximately 4,500 homes in Minneapolis with an average savings of $85 per year and the program has received a high satisfaction rate. He advised that workshops would be held on April 5, April 14, and April 24. Councilmember Mavity stated she hoped that residents will take advantage of this program and expressed appreciation to staff for making this program available. It was moved by Councilmember Mavity, seconded by Councilmember Sanger, to adopt Resolution No. 12-051 Approving Community Energy Services Program 2012. The motion passed 7-0. 8c. Project Report: Local Street Rehabilitation Project – Pavement Management Area 8, Project Nos. 2011-1000 and 2012-1400 Resolution No. 12-052 Mr. Olson presented the staff report and explained that this project includes 3.7 miles of streets in the Fern Hill, Lake Forest, Cedarhurst and Blackstone neighborhoods. He presented a map showing the streets to be worked on and indicated asphalt will be removed and replaced, minor soil corrections will be made, curb and gutter will be replaced including some driveway aprons, minor drainage system repairs will be made, City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 3c) Page 7 Subject: City Council Meeting Minutes of March 19, 2012 and fire hydrants will be replaced. He noted that some gas main work will be performed by CenterPoint Energy during this project and will precede the City’s work. He reviewed the public process and indicated residents will be notified regarding timelines for construction in their neighborhoods. He advised that roads will be open to local traffic during the project, each block will see five to six weeks of construction, and access will be provided to driveways at most times with overnight parking allowed on streets. He stated the estimated cost of the project is $1,906,160 and will be paid by the Pavement Management Fund and Water Utility Fund. He added construction is scheduled to begin in late June, 2012. Councilmember Sanger stated that a number of streets being redone are long streets with no cross streets, e.g., Cedar Lake Road, and expressed concern that residents will have a difficult time finding a place to park if their driveways are blocked. She also expressed concern about access to the Jewish Community Center which has only one entrance. Mr. Olson indicated that the City will stage all work accordingly and in some situations, the road will be re-built in sections. He added the City does not anticipate blocking any driveways. Councilmember Mavity requested that the City make sure residents are properly notified regarding temporary water shut-off. She stated that if residents need to replace their sewer service lines out into the street, they should be notified of this opportunity and to coordinate sewer line replacement with the City. Mr. Olson advised that residents will be notified regarding sewer line replacement as part of the overall notification process and agreed the City can coordinate this work prior to street paving. Councilmember Ross agreed with the concerns raised about road closures and noted that buses use some of these roads which will make it difficult to access. She urged the City to remain sensitive to this issue and stated she did not want to see a repeat of the issues experienced during last year’s road sealcoating project in the Kilmer Neighborhood. It was moved by Councilmember Sanger, seconded by Councilmember Mavity, to adopt Resolution No. 12-052 Accepting the Project Report, Establishing Improvement Project Nos. 2011-1000 & 2012-1400 Approving Plans and Specifications, and Authorizing Advertisement for Bids for Improvement Project Nos. 2011-1000 & 2012-1400. The motion passed 7-0. 8d. Highway 7/Wooddale Interchange Traffic Improvement Options Mr. Brink presented the staff report and proposed traffic improvements for Wooddale Avenue. He noted that traffic improvement options for Beltline Boulevard will be presented to Council at a future study session. He explained that the Wooddale Avenue improvements include extending and widening the center median, restriping Wooddale Avenue, and shifting the crosswalks at the ramp approaches to improve sight lines. He presented a drawing of the planned improvements which will serve to slow traffic and give people a wider refuge to stop in the middle if needed. He stated that a surmountable City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 3c) Page 8 Subject: City Council Meeting Minutes of March 19, 2012 curb will be required when making a southbound left turn from the frontage road to Wooddale Avenue in order to make it obvious that this serves as a refuge and vehicles should not be driving in this area. He indicated the cost of these improvements is approximately $25,000 and will be paid through existing operating budgets. He added that Council also discussed in-pavement lighting and the City’s consultant has recommended that the other improvements be implemented first and then re-evaluate the in-pavement lighting at a later date. He indicated the cost of in-pavement lighting is approximately $25,000. Councilmember Mavity expressed thanks to the City for moving forward with the proposed improvements. She stated nothing will replace bikers, walkers, and vehicles from being aware of what is going on around them and it is still everyone’s responsibility to remain alert. She expressed support for the improvements and is hopeful they will improve the safety of this intersection. She noted that the trail crossing at Beltline Boulevard presents a more difficult challenge from an engineering perspective and urged the City to do whatever it can to fast track the solutions Council previously discussed. Mayor Jacobs stated the best solution is a grade separated crossing at Beltline and felt this could be discussed when the light rail stations are added. He stated he attended a meeting with representatives from Three Rivers Park District and mentioned to them that this crossing is a major concern for the City and the City would like to have the crossings separated for traffic management and safety. It was moved by Councilmember Mavity, seconded by Councilmember Sanger, to approve the three traffic improvement options for Wooddale Avenue as recommended in the staff report and detailed in the consultant’s report dated March 13, 2012. The motion passed 7-0. 9. Communications Councilmember Hallfin congratulated Benilde St. Margaret for winning the State High School Hockey Tournament. 10. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 8:50 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Nancy Stroth, City Clerk Jeff Jacobs, Mayor Meeting Date: April 2, 2012 Agenda Item #: 4a Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance Presentation Other: EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other: Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other: TITLE: Second Reading of Ordinance Amending Ward Boundaries. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Approve Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance amending the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code Section 10-1 establishing ward boundary lines, and to Adopt Resolution establishing precincts and polling places. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does Council wish to adopt this Ordinance amending ward boundaries and this Resolution establishing precincts and polling places? BACKGROUND: A public hearing and first reading of an ordinance to amend the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code Section 10-1 Elections - Establishing Ward Boundaries following the 2010 U.S. Census - occurred at the March 19, 2012 City Council meeting. No one spoke at the public hearing, and the City Council unanimously approved the first reading of the ordinance. Redistricting occurs after each 10 year census and is the process used to adjust the various elective district boundaries to account for population shifts. City governments must redistrict and reestablish precincts after state redistricting. City Charter Section 2.03 requires Council to re-determine ward boundaries after each census and that the four ward boundaries be adopted by ordinance based on findings that the wards so established are of as near equal size in both population and area as practicable in order to ensure equal representation. The City is required to adopt new ward and precinct boundaries by April 3, 2012. Redistricting Plan – Ward Boundaries Ward boundaries determined in the Redistricting Plan met the following State Statute and City Charter requirements: • Wards must be equal in population as practicable (M.S. 205.84 subd. 1) • Wards must be composed of census blocks and bounded by precinct lines • Wards must be compact and of contiguous territory • Deviation in population in any ward is recommended to be within 5% of the average Ward Population Deviation Chart WARD 2010 census population Average population 2010 census Ward deviation Redistricting Plan Ward deviation 1 11,385 11,310 + 0.6% + 0.7% 2 12,068 11,310 + 6.0% + 0.1% 3 11,252 11,310 - 0.5% + 0.6% 4 10,536 11,310 - 7.0% - 1.5% City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 4a) Page 2 Subject: Second Reading of Ordinance Amending Ward Boundaries The following information describes the neighborhood changes in each Ward that would occur with the ward boundary changes as proposed in the Ordinance: • WARD 1 keeps existing neighborhoods of Bronx Park, Birchwood, Lake Forest, Fern Hill, and Sorenson. Triangle neighborhood would be added. Blackstone and Cedarhurst neighborhoods located north of the Burlington Northern RR would move to Ward 4. • WARD 2 keeps existing neighborhoods of Elmwood, Wolfe Park, Minikahda Oaks, Minikahda Vista, Browndale, Brookside, Creekside, Meadowbrook, and Brooklawns. South Oak Hill Park neighborhood would be added and Triangle neighborhood moves to Ward 1. • WARD 3 keeps existing neighborhoods of Lenox, Oak Hill, Aquila, Amhurst, Minnehaha, Cobblecrest, and all of Texa Tonka. South Oak Hill neighborhood would move to Ward 2. • WARD 4 would cover all residents north of Burlington Northern RR and keeps existing neighborhoods of Shelard Park, Kilmer, Westdale, Crestview, Westwood Hills, Cedar Manor, Willow Park, Pennsylvania Park, Eliot, and Eliot View. Blackstone and Cedarhurst would be added. The existing northern portion of TexaTonka neighborhood would move to Ward 3 to keep Texa Tonka neighborhood intact. Redistricting Plan – Precincts and Polling Locations Staff rated polling place locations and determined that the facilities listed below will best accommodate voters at this time: WARD Precinct No. Poll Name and Address 1 1 Beth El Synagogue, 5224 26th St W 2 Peter Hobart Elementary School, 6500 26th St W 3 City Hall, 5005 Minnetonka Blvd 4 Central Community Center, 6300 Walker St 2 5 Union Congregational Church, 3700 Alabama Ave S 6 SLP Rec Center, 3700 Monterey Dr 7 Susan Lindgren Elementary School, 4801 41st St W 8 Aldersgate Methodist Church, 3801 Wooddale Ave S 3 9 Prince of Peace Lutheran Church, 8115 State Hwy 7 10 Lenox Community Center, 6715 Minnetonka Blvd 11 St. Louis Park Sr. High School, 6425 33rd St W 12 Aquila Elementary School, 8500 31st St W 4 13 Westwood Lutheran Church, 9001 Cedar Lake Rd 14 Park Assembly Church, 1615 Texas Ave S 15 Peace Presbyterian Church, 7624 Cedar Lake Rd 16 Sabes Jewish Community Center, 4330 Cedar Lake Rd City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 4a) Page 3 Subject: Second Reading of Ordinance Amending Ward Boundaries Redistricting Calendar April 2 City Council Meeting Second Reading Ordinance adoption of Ward boundaries and Resolution adopting Precincts (effective August 14, 2012) April 3 Redistricting Plan submitted to County and Secretary of State April 13 Address changes due to County for updating in State Voter Registration System May 3 City publishes new boundaries, communication with residents through Park Perspective, city website, press and Cable TV etc. June 19 Notice of new boundaries posted in clerk’s office (56 days before Primary) July 20 County mails notice of voting precincts to all registered voters August 14 Primary Election November 6 Presidential General Election FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: A slight reduction in the election budget could occur with one less precinct saving approximately $4,000 in a Federal Election year due to expenses for less equipment, less election judges, less staff time, supplies, etc. Expenses related to citywide registered voter mailing notification will be covered by Hennepin County. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. Attachments: Ordinance Amending Ward Boundaries Ward Map Resolution Establishing Precincts Prepared by: Nancy Stroth, City Clerk Approved by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 4a) Page 4 Subject: Second Reading of Ordinance Amending Ward Boundaries ORDINANCE NO. ____-12 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 10: ELECTIONS ESTABLISHING WARD BOUNDARIES FOLLOWING THE 2010 U.S. CENSUS THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK DOES ORDAIN: SECTION 1. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 2.03 of the City Charter of the City of St. Louis Park, the four ward boundaries are hereby established and the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code Section 10-1 is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 10-1. Ward lines established. Ward lines of the city are hereby determined, and the city is divided into four separate wards, as follows: (1) Ward No. 1. Ward No. 1 is as follows: Beginning at the intersection of Louisiana Ave. S. and the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks, south along Louisiana Ave. S. to Minnetonka Boulevard, east along Minnetonka Boulevard to the Soo Line Railroad tracks, south along the Soo Line Railroad tracks to State Hwy. 7, north/east along State Hwy. 7 to State Hwy. 100, south along State Hwy. 100 to the Southwest Transit Corridor tracks, north/east along the Southwest Transit Corridor tracks to the eastern city limit, north along the eastern city limit to the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks, south/west along the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks to the point of beginning. (2) Ward No. 2. Ward No. 2 is described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of State Hwy. 7 and the southern city limit, following south and east along the southern city limit to the eastern city limit, north along the eastern city limit the Southwest Transit Corridor tracks, south/west along the Southwest Transit Corridor tracks to State Hwy. 100, north along State Hwy. 100 to State Hwy. 7, south/west along State Hwy. 7 to the point of beginning. (3) Ward No. 3. Ward No. 3 is described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks and the western city limit, south along the western city limit to the southern city limit, east along the southern city limit to State Hwy. 7, east along State Hwy. 7 to the Soo Line Railroad tracks, north along the Soo Line Railroad tracks to Minnetonka Boulevard, west along Minnetonka Boulevard to Louisiana Ave. S., north along Louisiana Ave. S. to the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks, south/west along the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks to the point of beginning. (4) Ward No. 4. Ward No. 4 is described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the northern and western city limits, south along the western city limit to the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks, east along the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks to the eastern city limit, north along the eastern city limit to the northern city limit, west/north along the northern city limit to the point of beginning. City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 4a) Page 5 Subject: Second Reading of Ordinance Amending Ward Boundaries SECTION 2. The Ward boundaries described above shall be effective for the conduct of the August 14, 2012 election. Public Hearing First Reading March 19, 2012 Second Reading April 2, 2012 Date of Publication April 12, 2012 Date Ordinance takes effect August 14, 2012 Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council April 2, 2012 City Manager Mayor Attest: Approved as to Form and Execution: City Clerk City Attorney City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 4a) Page 6 Subject: Second Reading of Ordinance Amending Ward Boundaries Ordinance No. ____-12 Map Attachment St. Louis Park Ward Boundaries Effective August 14, 2012 City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 4a) Page 7 Subject: Second Reading of Ordinance Amending Ward Boundaries RESOLUTION NO. 12-____ A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING PRECINCT BOUNDARIES FOLLOWING THE 2010 U.S. CENSUS, LEGISLATIVE REDISTRICTING AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 02-041 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, that the precinct boundaries and polling locations for the City of St. Louis Park are hereby amended and established as follows: WARD ONE Precinct 1 - Beth El Synagogue, 5224 26th Street West Beginning at the intersection of State Hwy. 100 and the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks, south along State Hwy. 100 to Minnetonka Boulevard, east along Minnetonka Boulevard to the eastern city limit, north along the eastern city limit to the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks, south/west along the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks to the point of beginning. Precinct 2 - Peter Hobart Elementary School, 6500 26th Street West Beginning at the intersection of Louisiana Ave. S. and the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks, south along Louisiana Ave. S. to Minnetonka Boulevard, east along Minnetonka Boulevard to State Hwy. 100, north along State Hwy. 100 to the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks, south/west along the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks to the point of beginning. Precinct 3 - St. Louis Park City Hall, 5005 Minnetonka Boulevard Beginning at the intersection of State Hwy. 100 and Minnetonka Boulevard, south along State Hwy. 100 to the Southwest Transit Corridor tracks, north/east along the Southwest Transit Corridor tracks to the eastern city limit, north along the eastern city limit to Minnetonka Boulevard, west along Minnetonka Boulevard to the point of beginning. Precinct 4 - Central Community Center, 6300 Walker Street Beginning at the intersection of Minnetonka Boulevard and the Soo Line Railroad tracks, south along the Soo Line Railroad tracks to State Hwy. 7, north/east along State Hwy. 7 to State Hwy. 100, north along State Hwy. 100 to Minnetonka Boulevard, west along Minnetonka Boulevard to the point of beginning. WARD TWO Precinct 5 - Union Congregational Church, 3700 Alabama Avenue South Beginning at the intersection of State Hwy. 7 and the Soo Line Railroad tracks, south along the Soo Line Railroad tracks to Oxford St., east along Oxford St. to Dakota Ave. S., south along Dakota Ave. S. to Goodrich Ave., east along Goodrich Ave. to Colorado Ave. S., south along Colorado Ave. S. to the Soo Line Railroad tracks, south/east along the Soo Line Railroad tracks to Excelsior Boulevard, north/east along Excelsior Boulevard to State Hwy. 100, north along State Hwy. 100 to State Hwy. 7, south/west along State Hwy. 7 to the point of beginning. City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 4a) Page 8 Subject: Second Reading of Ordinance Amending Ward Boundaries WARD TWO (continued) Precinct 6 - St. Louis Park Recreation Center, 3700 Monterey Drive Beginning at the intersection of the Southwest Transit Corridor tracks and State Hwy. 100, south along State Hwy. 100 to Excelsior Boulevard, north/east along Excelsior Boulevard to the eastern city limit, north along the eastern city limit to the Southwest Transit Corridor tracks, south/west along the Southwest Transit Corridor tracks to the point of beginning. Precinct 7 - Susan Lindgren Elementary School, 4801 41st Street West Beginning at the intersection of Excelsior Boulevard and State Hwy. 100, south along State Hwy. 100 to the southern city limit, east along the southern city limit to the eastern city limit, north along the eastern city limit to Excelsior Boulevard, south/west along Excelsior Boulevard to the point of beginning. Precinct 8 - Aldersgate Methodist Church, 3801 Wooddale Avenue South Beginning at the intersection of State Hwy. 7 and the southern city limit, following south and east along the southern city limit to State Hwy. 100, north along State Hwy. 100 to Excelsior Boulevard, south/west along Excelsior Boulevard to the Soo Line Railroad tracks, north/west along the Sioux Line Railroad tracks to Colorado Ave. S., north along Colorado Ave. S. to Goodrich Ave., west along Goodrich Ave. to Dakota Ave. S., north along Dakota Ave. S. to Oxford St., west along Oxford St. to the Soo Line Railroad tracks, north /west along the Soo Line Railroad tracks to State Hwy 7, west along State Hwy. 7 to the point of beginning. WARD THREE Precinct 9 - Prince of Peace Lutheran Church, 8115 State Hwy 7 Beginning at the intersection of Minnehaha Creek and the western city limit, south along the western city limit to the southern city limit, east along the southern city limit to State Hwy. 7, east along State Hwy. 7 to Texas Ave. S., north along Texas Ave. S. to 33rd St. W., west along 33rd St. W. to Cedar Lake Trail Extension, south along Cedar Lake Trail Extension to 34th St. W., west along 34th St. W. to its intersection with Minnehaha Creek, west along Minnehaha Creek to the point of beginning. Precinct 10 - Lenox Community Center, 6715 Minnetonka Boulevard Beginning at the intersection of Minnetonka Boulevard and Rhode Island Ave. S., south along Rhode Island Ave. S. to 31st St. W., west along 31st St. W. to Texas Ave. S., south along Texas Ave. S. to State Hwy. 7, east along State Hwy. 7 to Louisiana Ave. S., north along Louisiana Ave. S. to Minnetonka Boulevard, west along Minnetonka Boulevard to the point of beginning. Precinct 11 - St. Louis Park Senior High School, 6425 33rd Street West Beginning at the intersection of Minnetonka Boulevard and Louisiana Ave. S., south along Louisiana Ave. S. to State Hwy. 7, east along State Hwy. 7 to the Soo Line Railroad tracks, north along the Soo Line Railroad tracks to Minnetonka Boulevard, west along Minnetonka Boulevard to the point of beginning. City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 4a) Page 9 Subject: Second Reading of Ordinance Amending Ward Boundaries WARD THREE (continued) Precinct 12 - Aquila Elementary School, 8500 31st Street West Beginning at the intersection of the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks and the western city limit, south along the western city limit to Minnehaha Creek, east along Minnehaha Creek to 34th St. W., east along 34th St. W. to Cedar Lake Trail Extension, north along Cedar Lake Trail Extension to 33rd St. W., east along 33rd St. W. to Texas Ave. S., north along Texas Ave. S. to 31st St. W., east along 31st St. W. to Rhode Island Ave. S., north along Rhode Island Ave. S. to Minnetonka Boulevard, east along Minnetonka Boulevard to Louisiana Ave. S., north along Louisiana Ave. S. to the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks, south/west along the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks to the point of beginning. WARD FOUR Precinct 13 - Westwood Lutheran Church, 9001 Cedar Lake Road Beginning at the intersection of the northern and western city limits, south along the western city limit to the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks, east along the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks to the census block line which runs north and south along the eastern shore of Hannon Lake (9019 Cedar Lake Road), north along that census block line to Cedar Lake Road, west along Cedar Lake Road to Flag Ave. S., north along Flag Ave. S. to 18th St. W., west along 18th St. W. to Hillsboro Ave. S., north along Hillsboro Ave. S. to its intersection with 14th Ave. W., east along 14th Ave. W. to its intersection with Flag Ave. S., north along Flag Ave. S. to the northern city limit, west and north along the northern city limit to the point of beginning. Precinct 14 - Park Assembly Church, 1615 Texas Avenue South Beginning at the intersection of the northern city limit and Flag Ave. S., south along Flag Ave. S. to 14th St. W., west along 14th St. W. to Hillsboro Ave. S., south along Hillsboro Ave. S. to 18th St. W., east along 18th St. W. to Flag Ave. S., south along Flag Ave. S. to Cedar Lake Road, east along Cedar Lake Road to the census block line which runs north and south along the eastern shore of Hannon Lake (9019 Cedar Lake Road), south along that census block line to the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks, north/west along the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks to Louisiana Ave. S., north along Louisiana Ave. S. to Franklin Ave. W., west along Franklin Ave. W. to Pennsylvania Ave. S., north along Pennsylvania Ave. S. to 14th St. W., west along 14th St. W. to Texas Ave. S., north along Texas Ave. S. to the northern city limit, west along the northern city limit to the point of beginning. Precinct 15 - Peace Presbyterian Church, 7624 Cedar Lake Road Beginning at the intersection of the northern city limit and Texas Ave. S., south along Texas Ave. S. to 14th St. W., east along 14th St. W. to Pennsylvania Ave. S., south along Pennsylvania Ave. S. to Franklin Ave. W., east along Franklin Ave. W. to Louisiana Ave. S., south along Louisiana Ave. S. to Cedar Lake Road, north/east along Cedar Lake Road to the Soo Line Railroad tracks, north along the Soo Line Railroad tracks to the northern city limit, west along the northern city limit to the point of beginning. City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 4a) Page 10 Subject: Second Reading of Ordinance Amending Ward Boundaries WARD FOUR (continued) Precinct 16 - Sabes Jewish Community Center, 4330 Cedar Lake Road Beginning at the intersection of the northern city limit and the Soo Line Railroad tracks, south along the Soo Line Railroad tracks to Cedar Lake Road, west along Cedar Lake Road to Louisiana Ave. S., south along Louisiana Ave. S. to the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks, east along the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks to the eastern city limit, north along the eastern city limit to the northern city limit, west and north along the northern city limit to the point of beginning. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the precinct boundaries shall be effective for the conduct of the August 14, 2012 election. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council April 2, 2012 City Manager Mayor Attest: City Clerk Meeting Date: April 2, 2012 Agenda Item #: 4b Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance Presentation Other: EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other: Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other: TITLE: Special Assessment - Water Service Line Repair at 3205 Cavell Lane. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution authorizing the special assessment for the repair of the water service line at 3205 Cavell Lane, St. Louis Park, MN - P.I.D. 18-117-21-24-0014. POLICY CONSIDERATION: The proposed action is consistent with policy previously established by the City Council. BACKGROUND: Kristina Anderson, owner of the single family residence at 3205 Cavell Lane, has requested the City to authorize the repair of the water service line for her home and assess the cost against the property in accordance with the City’s special assessment policy. The City requires the repair of service lines to promote the general public health, safety and welfare within the community. The special assessment policy for the repair or replacement of water or sewer service lines for existing homes was adopted by the City Council in 1996. This program was put into place because sometimes property owners face financial hardships when emergency repairs like this are unexpectedly required. Plans and permits for this service line repair work were completed, submitted, and approved by City staff. The property owner hired a contractor and repaired the water service line in compliance with current codes and regulations. Based on the completed work, this repair qualifies for the City’s special assessment program. The property owner has petitioned the City to authorize the water service line repair and special assess the cost of the repair. The total eligible cost of the repair has been determined to be $3,595.00. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The City has funds in place to finance the cost of this special assessment. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. Attachments: Resolution Prepared by: Scott Anderson, Utility Superintendent Through: Mike Rardin, Public Works Director Brian Swanson, Controller Approved by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 4b) Page 2 Subject: Special Assessment – Water Service Line Repair at 3205 Cavell Lane RESOLUTION NO. 12-____ RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE REPAIR OF THE WATER SERVICE LINE AT 3205 CAVELL LANE, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN P.I.D. 18-117-21-24-0014 WHEREAS, the Property Owner at 3205 Cavell Lane has petitioned the City of St. Louis Park to authorize a special assessment for the repair of the water service line for the single family residence located at 3205 Cavell Lane; and WHEREAS, the Property Owner has agreed to waive the right to a public hearing, right of notice and right of appeal pursuant to Minnesota Statute, Chapter 429; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park has received a report from the Utility Superintendent related to the repair of the water service line. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, that: 1. The petition from the Property Owner requesting the approval and special assessment for the water service line repair is hereby accepted. 2. The water service line repair that was done in conformance with the plans and specifications approved by the Public Works Department and Department of Inspections is hereby accepted. 3. The total cost for the repair of the water service line is accepted at $3,595.00. 4. The Property Owner has agreed to waive the right to a public hearing, notice and appeal from the special assessment; whether provided by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, or by other statutes, or by ordinance, City Charter, the constitution, or common law. 5. The Property Owner has agreed to pay the City for the total cost of the above improvements through a special assessment over a ten (10) year period at the interest rate of 5.85 %. 6. The Property Owner has executed an agreement with the City and all other documents necessary to implement the repair of the water service line and the special assessment of all costs associated therewith. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council April 2, 2012 City Manager Mayor Attest: City Clerk Meeting Date: April 2, 2012 Agenda Item #: 4c Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance Presentation Other: EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other: Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other: TITLE: Acceptance of Minnesota Resuscitation Consortium (MRC) Grant. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Accept Donation from the Minnesota Resuscitation Consortium Grant in the amount of $5,000 for community hands only CPR training. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish to accept the grant with restrictions on the use? BACKGROUND: State statute requires City Council’s acceptance of donations. This requirement is necessary in order to make sure the City Council has knowledge of any restrictions placed on the use of each donation prior to it being expended. The Minnesota Resuscitation Consortium is graciously donating to the Fire Department an amount of $5,000. The donation is given with restrictions. According to the Medical Director of the MRC, cardiac arrest care is a constantly changing process. There is new research and tools that can be utilized to improve outcomes. The work being done by grant recipients will help to identify survival rates, best practices and new ideas that can help communities that are working to improve their level of care. The MRC aims to increase survival rates of sudden cardiac arrest by connecting bystander, pre-hospital and hospital care. The St. Louis Park Fire Department will use the grant money to instruct hands only CPR training in St. Louis Park. St. Louis Park Fire Department will work with five neighboring communities that also received grants to maximize the award. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: This grant will assist us in obtaining equipment and pay for instructor costs. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not Applicable. Attachments: Resolution Minnesota Resuscitation Consortium Press Release Prepared by: Mike Dobesh, Assistant Chief Reviewed by: Luke Stemmer, Fire Chief Approved by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 4c) Page 2 Subject: Acceptance of Minnesota Resuscitation Consortium (MRC) Grant RESOLUTION NO. 12-____ RESOLUTION APPROVING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT FROM THE MINNESOTA RESUSCITATION CONSORTIUM IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,000 FOR USE BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT FOR COMMUNITY CPR TRAINING WHEREAS, The City of St. Louis Park is required by State statute to authorize acceptance of any grants; and WHEREAS, the City Council must also ratify any restrictions placed on the grant by the donor; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Resuscitation Consortium’s desire is to assist the Fire Department in improving sudden cardiac arrest survival with a grant of $5,000; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park that the grant is hereby accepted with thanks and appreciation. Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council April 2, 2012 City Manager Mayor Attest: City Clerk City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 4c) Page 3 Subject: Acceptance of Minnesota Resuscitation Consortium (MRC) Grant FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Media Contacts: March 27, 2012 Mike Dobesh, Assistant Chief 952-924-2594 Kim Harkins, MRC, 612-626-1382 St. Louis Park Fire Department Named Recipient of MN Resuscitation Consortium Grant $5,000 will help continue St. Louis Park Fire Department’s mission to increase sudden cardiac arrest survival rates in Minnesota. St. Louis Park, MN – The St. Louis Park Fire Department recently received a grant in the amount of $5,000 from the MN Resuscitation Consortium (MRC). The MN Resuscitation Consortium aims to increase survival rates of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) by connecting bystander, pre-hospital, and hospital initiatives to establish and implement a set of protocols that incorporate the latest technologies and proven treatment methods. The Consortium is part of the HeartRescue Project. Initiated in 2010 by the Medtronic Foundation, the HeartRescue Project assembles the country’s leading emergency and resuscitation experts to expand successful city and county SCA response programs to statewide levels. A primary objective of the program is to develop an integrated community response to SCA, ensuring everyone is prepared to respond by calling 911, starting chest compressions immediately and using an AED. Commenting on the announcement, Assistant Chief Mike Dobesh said, “This grant will continue the mission of St. Louis Park Fire Department to improve outcomes of sudden cardiac arrest.” Demetris Yannopoulos, M.D., Medical Director for the MN Resuscitation Consortium explained further by stating, “Cardiac arrest care is a constantly changing process. There is new research and tools that can be utilized to improve outcomes. The work being done by our grant recipients will help to identify survival rates, best practices and new ideas that can help communities that are working to improve their level of care.” About Sudden Cardiac Arrest (SCA) Sudden cardiac arrest is a public health crisis during which the heart stops without warning. SCA is often caused by abnormalities of the heart’s electrical conduction system. Signs of SCA include unconsciousness and lack of breath. As the leading cause of death in the world, SCA strikes an estimated 295,000 Americans each year. To learn more about SCA and the MN Resuscitation Consortium, please visit www.mrc.umn.edu About the HeartRescue Project The HeartRescue Project, funded by the Medtronic Foundation, aims to increase survival from out of hospital cardiac arrest by 50 percent over five years in select regions that include Minnesota, Arizona, Washington, Pennsylvania and North Carolina. Learn more at www.heartrescueproject.com. Meeting Date: April 2, 2012 Agenda Item #: 4d Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance Presentation Other: EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other: Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other: TITLE: Consider Resolution in Support of the City’s application for the 2012 Transportation Economic Development (TED) Grant Funding Program for Highway 7 / Louisiana Avenue Interchange Project. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution in Support of the 2012 TED Grant Request for the Highway 7 / Louisiana Avenue Interchange project, Project No. 2012-0100. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the Council wish to submit a grant application to the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) and the Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) to help supplement the construction funding for a new grade separated interchange at the intersection of TH 7 & Louisiana Avenue? BACKGROUND: History The City’s Capital Improvement Program (C.I.P.) indentifies the Highway 7/Louisiana Avenue intersection as a priority improvement project. The proposed project will provide for the construction of a grade-separated interchange at Louisiana Avenue and Highway 7. The project also includes pedestrian and bicycle friendly improvements along with re-configuration of the frontage roads in order to improve access, safety, and traffic flow for both the Highway 7 corridor and Louisiana Avenue. This proposed improvement is essential in meeting long term transportation and safety needs of both Mn/DOT and the City. TED Grant The Transportation Economic Development Program (TED) is a competitive grant program available to communities for highway improvement and public infrastructure projects that create jobs and support economic development. The program is a collaboration between the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) and the Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT). The funds available for the 2012 program will be $20 million to $30 million, depending on legislative action. • Mn/DOT has committed $20 million in Trunk Highway funds. • DEED is requesting additional resources in the form of general obligation bonds in the 2012 legislative session. Grant Application Timeline The two-phase application process will continue according to the following timeline. City Council Meeting April 2, 2012 (Item No. 4d) Page 2 Subject: Support Resolution for TED Grant for Highway 7 / Louisiana Avenue Interchange Project • February 15, 2012 Solicitation announcement distributed • February 15-April 20, 2012 Applications prepared (Mn/DOT and DEED offer guidance) • April 27, 2012 Applications due to Mn/DOT • May 18, 2012 Projects selected and approved • May to October, 2012 Project status monitored by Mn/DOT and DEED to develop final cost-share agreements, ensure progress and program compliance FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Funding Sources and Opportunities $7,630,000 in federal funds has been secured through the Met Council’s State Transportation Program Urban Grant solicitation. $594,000 has been secured through the Mn/DOT Municipal Agreement Program. Mn/DOT has also committed $1,000,000 in Access Management Funds towards the project. Presented below are the current project costs based on advanced design work. Funding sources known at this time are also presented below: Current Estimated Project Costs Construction $18,090,000 Preliminary and Final Design Engineering $ 1,818,000 Construction Engineering (estimated consultant cost) $ 1,800,000 Right of Way $ 2,700,000 Total Costs $24,408,000 Funding Sources Federal (STP) Funds $7,630,000 Mn/DOT Access Management Funds $1,000,000 Mn/DOT Cooperative Agreement Funds $ 594,000 Mn/DOT (Construction Eng’r Value) $1,800,000 City Funds (20% construction grant match – source TBD) $2,398,000 City Funds (Preliminary and Final Design Eng’r – source TBD) $1,800,000 City Funds (Right of Way – source TBD) $2,700,000 Total Committed Funds $17,922,000 Current Unfunded Amount $6,486,000 Current funding for Phases 1, 2, 3 and 4 comes from HRA levy proceeds which have been designated to pay for infrastructure improvements in redeveloping areas. City Council Meeting April 2, 2012 (Item No. 4d) Page 3 Subject: Support Resolution for TED Grant for Highway 7 / Louisiana Avenue Interchange Project VISION CONSIDERATION: The following Strategic Direction and focus area has been identified by Council. St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged community. Focus will be on: • Promoting regional transportation issues and related dedicated funding sources affecting St. Louis Park including but not limited to Hwy. 100 and SWLRT. Attachments: Resolution Prepared by: Jim Olson, Engineering Project Manager Reviewed by: Scott Brink, City Engineer Mike Rardin, Public Works Director Approved by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director City Council Meeting April 2, 2012 (Item No. 4d) Page 4 Subject: Support Resolution for TED Grant for Highway 7 / Louisiana Avenue Interchange Project RESOLUTION NO. 12- RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF THE 2012 TRANSPORTATION ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (TED) GRANT REQUEST FOR TRUNK HIGHWAY 7/LOUISIANA AVENUE INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park is the official governing body of the City of St. Louis Park; and WHEREAS, this project is consistent with the City of St. Louis Park’s Capital Improvement Plan and Comprehensive Plan and it is believed to be consistent with the policies of the Metropolitan Council's Development Guide, including the Transportation Policy Plan and Development Framework, the draft 2010-2013 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and the Minnesota Department of Transportation’s 2010 – 2013 Surface Transportation Improvement Program (STIP); and WHEREAS, this project is located in a significant high use transportation corridor (Trunk Highway 7) in the Twin Cities metropolitan area and this project supports improvements planned to the regional and local transportation system; and WHEREAS, this project was awarded $7.63 million through the Surface Transportation Program as recommended by the Metropolitan Council’s Transportation Advisory Board in 2007; and WHEREAS, Mn/DOT has identified the TH 7 & Louisiana Avenue intersection as a high safety priority concern; and WHEREAS, the project area lies adjacent to the Reilly Superfund Site and the project will spur economic development and job creation to this distressed area; and WHEREAS, this project supports and enhances inter-modal transportation uses, including motor vehicle, transit, light rail (Southwest Transitway), bicycle, and pedestrian uses; and WHEREAS, this project implements a solution in the form of continuity, capacity, and safety to a transportation problem and provides a much needed upgrade to the regional transportation system. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park does hereby support the application for the 2012 TED Grant by for the TH 7/Louisiana Ave. Interchange Improvement Project. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council April 2, 2012 City Manager Mayor Attest: City Clerk Meeting Date: April 2, 2012 Agenda Item #: 4e Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance Presentation Other: EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other: Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other: TITLE: Special Assessment for Fire Suppression Sprinkler System. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution establishing a special assessment for the installation of a fire suppression sprinkler system at 7317 West Lake Street, St. Louis Park, MN. POLICY CONSIDERATION: This action is consistent with a policy the Council has established in 1995. BACKGROUND: M & L Anodizing Properties LLC, owner(s) of the commercial building at 7317 West Lake Street, have requested the City to authorize the installation of an automatic fire suppression sprinkler system for the commercial building and assess the cost against the property in accordance with the City’s special assessment policy. ANALYSIS: The special assessment policy for installation of automatic fire sprinkler systems in existing buildings was adopted by the City Council in 1995. The City promotes the installation of fire suppression sprinkler systems and facilitates their installation to promote the general public health, safety and welfare within the community. The Building Code requires the installation of a fire sprinkler system due to major remodeling project of the building. The property owner will be hiring a contractor to install the sprinkler system throughout the building and bring it up to compliance with the current code. Based on the proposed work, the system qualifies for the City’s special assessment program. The property owner has petitioned the City to authorize the installation of the fire sprinkler system and special assess the cost of the installation. Sprinkler plans have been submitted and approved by City staff. The total eligible cost of the installation has been determined to be $73,837.00. An administrative fee of $369.19 shall be received prior to the release of the special assessment funds. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Staff has determined that adequate funds are available through the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund to assist with this project. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. Attachments: Resolution Contract Prepared by: Cary Smith, Fire Marshal Reviewed by: Luke Stemmer, Fire Chief Approved by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 4e) Page 2 Subject: Special Assessment for Fire Suppression Sprinkler System RESOLUTION NO. 12-____ RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING INSTALLATION AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT OF FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AT 7317 WEST LAKE STREET , ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 WHEREAS, M & L Anodizing Properties LLC, the Property Owner at 7317 West Lake Street have petitioned the City of St. Louis Park to authorize a special assessment for the installation of a fire sprinkler system in the building on the Benefited Property; and WHEREAS, the Property Owner has agreed to waive their right to a public hearing, right of notice and right of appeal pursuant to Minnesota Statute, Chapter 429; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park has received a report from the Fire Marshal related to the installation of the fire sprinkler system NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, that: 1. The petition from the Property Owner requesting the approval and special assessment for the fire sprinkler system is hereby accepted. 2. The installation of the fire sprinkler system in conformance with the plans and specifications approved by the Fire Department and Department of Inspections is hereby authorized. 3. The total estimated cost for the design and complete installation of the fire sprinkler system is accepted at $73,837.00. 4. An administrative fee of $369.19 (.5% of $73,837.00) for processing shall be received prior to the release of special assessment funds. 5. The total special assessment against the property will be $73,837.00. 6. The Property Owners have agreed to waive their rights to a public hearing, notice and appeal from the special assessment; whether provided by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, or by other statutes, or by ordinance, City Charter, the constitution, or common law. 7. The Property Owners agree to pay the City for the cost of the above improvements through a special assessment over a ten (10) year period at five point eight five percent (5.85%) interest. 8. The Property Owners agree to execute an agreement with the City and any other documents necessary to implement the installation of the fire sprinkler system and the special assessment of all costs associated therewith. City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 4e) Page 3 Subject: Special Assessment for Fire Suppression Sprinkler System The Property Owners agree to execute an agreement with the City and any other documents necessary to implement the installation of the fire sprinkler system and the special assessment of all costs associated therewith. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council April 2, 2012 City Manager Mayor Attest: City Clerk City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 4e) Page 4 Subject: Special Assessment for Fire Suppression Sprinkler System CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK PETITION FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT FIRE PROTECTION (SPRINKLER) IMPROVEMENT, FOR M & L ANODIZING PROPERTIES LLC, PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7317 WEST LAKE STREET, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55426 AGREEMENT made as of April 2, 2012 between the City of St. Louis Park, a Minnesota corporation (“City”) and M & L Anodizing Properties LLC, (Owner). “Property Owner(s)”, concerning special assessment on fire sprinkler improvement on property located at 7317 West Lake Street, Hennepin County P.I.D. number 2011721210093, “Benefited Property” described as Parcel 1: All of Lot 17, Block 161, Parcel 2: That part of the Northwesterly 100 feet of Lot 16, Block 161, lying Southwesterly of the Southeasterly extension of a line running parallel with and 90.75 feet Northeasterly of the Southwesterly line of Lot 18, said Block 161 Parcel 3: Lot 19, Block 161, “Rearrangement of St. Louis Park”, together with that part of vacated South Street, accruing thereto, Hennepin County, Minnesota Parcel 4: That part of Lot 18, Block 161, “Rearrangement of St. Louis Park”, lying southwesterly of the following described line: Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Lot 18; thence North 64 degrees 40 minutes 20 seconds East, assumed bearing, alone the northwesterly line of said Lot 18 a distance of 89.54 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be herein described; thence South 26 degrees 53 minutes 09 seconds East 197.06 feet; thence South 26 degrees 32 minutes 08 seconds East 191.o2 feet to the Southeasterly line of said lot 18 as measured along the Southeasterly line of said lot 18. The City and the Property Owner agree as follows: 1) Property Owner(s). The Property Owner is M & L Anodizing Properties LLC. 2) Subject Property. The Property Owner is the fee owner of the property legally described in attached “Exhibit A” incorporated by reference herein. 3) Purpose of Agreement. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 sub. 3 and St. Louis Park Resolution 12-____ the Property Owner petitioned the City on February 8, 2012 to specially assess the cost of the installation of an automatic fire sprinkler system in his building at the Benefited Property. The petition attached as “Exhibit B” is incorporated into this agreement by reference. The City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the public for the City to facilitate the installation of a fire sprinkler system in the Benefited Property to promote the public health, safety and welfare. 4) Administrative Fee. An administrative fee of $369.19 for the processing of the sprinkler special assessment shall be received prior to the release of special assessment funds. 5) The Improvement Project. The construction of an automatic fire sprinkler system throughout the commercial building at the Benefited Property in conformance with plans and specifications as described in Exhibit B and as approved by the St. Louis Park Fire and Inspections Departments. City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 4e) Page 5 Subject: Special Assessment for Fire Suppression Sprinkler System 6) Responsibility. The Property Owner shall assume all responsibility for the installation, operation and maintenance of the fire sprinkler system, including all construction contracts and monitoring agreements. 7) Amount to be assessed. The total estimated cost of the project, based on the lowest responsible bid, is $73,837.00, all of which is proposed to be assessed against the Benefited Property as described in Paragraph 2 above. It is hereby agreed that the full cost of the project and minus the administrative fee of $369.19 will be assessed against the property. The total Special Assessment against the property will be $73,837.00. 8) Waiver of Notice and Hearing. In connection with this improvement, the Property Owner agrees to waive and does waive any and all rights to public hearing and right to any notice, whether provided by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, or any other statute or by ordinance, City Charter, constitution, or common law. 9) Waiver of Right of Appeal. In connection with this improvement, the Property Owner agrees to waive and does waive any and all rights to appeal from the special assessment set forth above, whether provided by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, or any other statute or by ordinance, City Charter, constitution, or common law. 10) Implementation. Each party to this agreement agrees to execute any other documents upon request of the City, necessary to implement the waivers of notice, hearing and right of appeal for the special assessment for the improvement project. 11) Payment. The Property Owner agrees to pay the City for the cost of the above improvements in accordance with the following terms: a) The assessment shall be paid in equal installments over ten (10) years at five point eight-five percent (5.85%) interest on the unpaid balance and in accordance with all provisions of the City policy for special assessments for fire sprinkler improvements. 12) Indemnification. The Property Owner shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, agents and employees from and against all claims, damages, losses, or expenses, including attorney’s fees, which may be suffered or from which they may be held liable, rising out of or resulting from the assertion against them of any claims, debts or obligations in consequence of the performance of this agreement by the City, its employees, agents or subcontractors. 13) Certification of Encumbrances or Contract for Deed. Each party to this agreement certifies that the property described in Paragraph 1 above, is owned by that party in simple fee and is free and clear of all encumbrances or Contracts for Deed except as follows: 14) Right to Record. It is agreed that the City may record this document in the chain of title of the Benefited Property legally described above. City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 4e) Page 6 Subject: Special Assessment for Fire Suppression Sprinkler System 15) Payment. The Property Owner agrees that, after the City has completed the required inspections and has determined that the installation of the fire sprinkler system is in conformance with the applicable City ordinances and State laws, the Property Owner will provide the following documents to the City to allow the City to process payment of the amount to be assessed for the installation of the fire sprinkler system on the Benefited Property: a) A sworn construction statement stipulating the contractors and suppliers involved in the fire sprinkler installation on the Benefited Property and the agreed payment amounts, and b) A written notice from the Property Owner that they have determined the installation of the fire sprinkler system has been substantially completed as stipulated in their contract with their contractor, and c) Evidence of receipt of a lien waiver from the contractors and suppliers for the improvement project on the Benefited Property. It is further agreed by the City and the Property Owners, in making payment to the Property Owner, the City is not assuming responsibility for payment to any contractor or supplier for the installation of the improvement project on the Benefited Property. This agreement has been entered into as of the 2 day of April 2012. FOR THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK: ____________________________________ Attest: Mayor ____________________________________ __________________________________ City Manager City Clerk ____________________________________ Fire Marshal (seal) Accounting Records Posted: ____________________________________ Finance Manager City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 4e) Page 7 Subject: Special Assessment for Fire Suppression Sprinkler System * FOR THE PROPERTY OWNER: ADDITIONAL ENCUMBRANCE(S) PROPERTY OWNER(S) _______________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ * All signatures of owners or encumbrances must be acknowledged by a Notary Public. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of ______________, 2012, by ________________________________________, property located at 7317 West Lake Street. Property Owner(s) ____________________________________ Notary Public THIS AGREEMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: St. Louis Park Fire Department 5005 Minnetonka Boulevard St. Louis Park, MN 55416 952-924-2500 Meeting Date: April 2, 2012 Agenda Item #: 4f Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance Presentation Other: EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other: Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other: TITLE: Approve Plans and Specifications for Standing Seam Roof Replacement on Park Buildings and Authorize Receipt of Bids. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution accepting this report, establishing and approving plans and specifications, and authorizing advertisement for bids for the roof replacement at various park buildings damaged in the 2011 hail storm. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish to continue to move forward with this project? BACKGROUND: A storm, which included hail, swept through St. Louis Park on May 10, 2011. Facilities at Aquila, Birchwood, Carpenter, Dakota, Fern Hill, Freedom, Louisiana Oaks, Nelson, Northside and Oak Hill Parks were damaged as a result of the storm and are in need of replacement. Replacing the park building roofs increases the life of the building. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: This claim has been submitted to the League of Minnesota Cities. The City will pay the claim from the uninsured loss fund, the League tracks the expenses and when expenses have reached the $50,000 per occurrence deductible, the League will then begin reimbursing the City. Vehicles were also damaged as a result of this storm. Staff estimates roof replacement expenditures in the approximate amount of $100,000. CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE Staff is suggesting the following schedule: April 2, 2012 - City Council approval of plans and authorization to bid April 12 & 19, 2012 - Advertise bids April 24, 2012 - Bid opening May 7, 2012 - City Council to review bid tab report and award contract May 14, 2012 - Begin project August 1, 2012 - Project completion NEXT STEPS AND TIMELINES: If the City Council approves the plans and specifications and authorizes bids, staff will receive bids on April 24, 2012. The Council will be asked to approve the low bid and authorize the project to begin at its May 7, 2012 meeting. Project construction will begin following Council approval and execution of an agreement. City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 4f) Page 2 Subject: Approve Plans & Specs Seam Roof Replacement Park Buildings & Authorize Receipt of Bids VISION CONSIDERATION: Keeping our park buildings maintained and useable is consistent with the City’s first strategic direction, “St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged community.” Attachments: Resolution Prepared by: Stacy Voelker, Administrative Secretary Rick Beane, Park Superintendent Reviewed by: Cindy Walsh, Director of Parks and Recreation Approved by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 4f) Page 3 Subject: Approve Plans & Specs Seam Roof Replacement Park Buildings & Authorize Receipt of Bids RESOLUTION NO. 12-____ RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE PROJECT REPORT, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park has received a report related to the replacement of the standing seam roofs on various park buildings from May 10, 2011 storm damage, Claim/Project No. LMC 11076951. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, that: 1. Such improvement as proposed is necessary, cost effective, and feasible as detailed in the Project Report. 2. The proposed project, designated as Claim/Project No. LMC 11076951 is hereby established and ordered. 3. The plans and specifications for the replacement of standing seam roofs on park buildings, as prepared under the direction of The Rec Center Manager, or designee, are approved. 4. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted at least two weeks in the official newspaper and at least one week in the Construction Bulletin, an advertisement for bids for the making of said improvement under said-approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall appear not less than ten (10) days prior to the date and time of receipt of bids, and specify the work to be done, state the date and time bids will be received by the City Clerk, and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the City Clerk and accompanied by a bid bond payable to the City for five (5) percent of the amount of the bid. 5. The Parks Superintendent, or designee, shall report the receipt of bids to the City Council shortly after the letting date. The report shall include a tabulation of the bid results and a recommendation to the City Council. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council April 2, 2012 City Manager Mayor Attest: City Clerk Meeting Date: April 2, 2012 Agenda Item #: 4g Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance Presentation Other: EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other: Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other: TITLE: Special Assessment - Sewer Service Line Repair at 7429 Edgebrook Drive. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution authorizing the special assessment for the repair of the sewer service line at 7429 Edgebrook Drive, St. Louis Park, MN, - P.I.D. 20-117-21-21-0073. POLICY CONSIDERATION: The proposed action is consistent with policy previously established by the City Council. BACKGROUND: Kyle Bakker, owner of the single family residence at 7429 Edgebrook Drive, has requested the City to authorize the repair of the sewer service line for his home and assess the cost against the property in accordance with the City’s special assessment policy. The City requires the repair of service lines to promote the general public health, safety and welfare within the community. The special assessment policy for the repair or replacement of water or sewer service lines for existing homes was adopted by the City Council in 1996. This program was put into place because sometimes property owners face financial hardships when emergency repairs like this are unexpectedly required. Plans and permits for this service line repair work were completed, submitted, and approved by City staff. The property owner hired a contractor and repaired the sewer service line in compliance with current codes and regulations. Based on the completed work, this repair qualifies for the City’s special assessment program. The property owner has petitioned the City to authorize the sewer service line repair and special assess the cost of the repair. The total eligible cost of the repair has been determined to be $2,778.00. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The City has funds in place to finance the cost of this special assessment. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. Attachments: Resolution Prepared by: Scott Anderson, Utility Superintendent Through: Mike Rardin, Public Works Director Brian Swanson, Controller Approved by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 4g) Page 2 Subject: Special Assessment – Sewer Service Line Repair at7429 Edgebrook Drive RESOLUTION NO. 12-____ RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE REPAIR OF THE SEWER SERVICE LINE AT 7429 EDGEBROOK DRIVE, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN P.I.D. 20-117-21-21-0073 WHEREAS, the Property Owner at 7429 Edgebrook Drive has petitioned the City of St. Louis Park to authorize a special assessment for the repair of the sewer service line for the single family residence located at 7429 Edgebrook Drive, St. Louis Park; and WHEREAS, the Property Owner has agreed to waive the right to a public hearing, right of notice and right of appeal pursuant to Minnesota Statute, Chapter 429; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park has received a report from the Utility Superintendent related to the repair of the sewer service line. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, that: 1. The petition from the Property Owner requesting the approval and special assessment for the sewer service line repair is hereby accepted. 2. The sewer service line repair that was done in conformance with the plans and specifications approved by the Public Works Department and Department of Inspections is hereby accepted. 3. The total cost for the repair of the sewer service line is accepted at $2,778.00. 4. The Property Owner has agreed to waive the right to a public hearing, notice and appeal from the special assessment; whether provided by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, or by other statutes, or by ordinance, City Charter, the constitution, or common law. 5. The Property Owner has agreed to pay the City for the total cost of the above improvements through a special assessment over a ten (10) year period at the interest rate of 5.85%. 6. The Property Owner has executed an agreement with the City and all other documents necessary to implement the repair of the sewer service line and the special assessment of all costs associated therewith. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council April 2, 2012 City Manager Mayor Attest: City Clerk Meeting Date: April 2, 2012 Agenda Item #: 4h Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance Presentation Other: EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other: Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other: TITLE: Vendor Claims. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to accept for filing Vendor Claims for the period March 10, 2012 through March 24, 2012. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. BACKGROUND: The Finance Department prepares this report on a monthly basis for Council’s review. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: None. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. Attachments: Vendor Claims Prepared by: Connie Neubeck, Account Clerk 3/28/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:41:46R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 1Page -Council Check Summary 3/24/2012 -3/10/2012 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 850.00COMM & MARKETING G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT3CMA 850.00 52.34TREE MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESA-1 OUTDOOR POWER INC 564.03TREE MAINTENANCE SMALL TOOLS 616.37 157.62ORGANIZED REC G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CARABERNATHY, LISA 157.62 87.48STORM WATER UTILITY G&A SMALL TOOLSABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY INC 87.48 7,307.20GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESABM JANITORIAL SERVICES 7,307.20 415.18UNINSURED LOSS G&A UNINSURED LOSSACE TRAILER SALES 415.18 218.88GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIESACOUSTICS ASSOCIATES INC 218.88 134.00GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEACTION FLEET INC 134.00 24.18OPERATIONSOPERATIONAL SUPPLIESAIRGAS NORTH CENTRAL 24.18 705.00OPERATIONSREPAIRSALEX AIR APPARATUS INC 705.00 90.53YOUTH PROGRAMS GENERAL SUPPLIESALL STAR SPORTS 90.53 85.14GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE OPERATIONAL SUPPLIESAMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SER 137.56PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 87.12PARK MAINTENANCE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 116.97ENTERPRISE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 146.85VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 61.82WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 61.82SEWER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 10.30STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 2 3/28/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:41:46R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 2Page -Council Check Summary 3/24/2012 -3/10/2012 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 707.58 9.68-IT G & A BANK CHARGES/CREDIT CD FEESANCHOR PAPER CO 1,034.76SUPPORT SERVICES G&A OFFICE SUPPLIES 1,025.08 1,538.33FABRICATIONOTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESANDERSEN INC, EARL 1,538.33 375.00ADMINISTRATION G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSAPA 375.00 240.00COMM DEV PLANNING G & A TRAININGAPA-MN ADMINISTRATORS 240.00 379.62BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESAPACHE GROUP OF MINNESOTA 379.62 293.42GENERAL CUSTODIAL DUTIES CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SUPPLYARAMARK UNIFORM CORP ACCTS 222.44ENTERPRISE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 515.86 563.81PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYASPEN EQUIPMENT CO 563.81 100.00SUPPORT SERVICES TRAININGATOM 100.00 170.95PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYAUTO ELECTRIC OF BLOOMINGTON I 170.95 131.58GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEAUTOMOBILE SERVICE 131.58 3,400.88STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICEBARR ENGINEERING CO 3,400.88 245.00INSPECTIONS G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSBATC 245.00 127.82POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIESBATTERIES PLUS 112.19WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 3 3/28/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:41:46R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 3Page -Council Check Summary 3/24/2012 -3/10/2012 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 240.01 1,400.00GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A RENTAL BUILDINGSBELT LINE PROPERTIES INC 1,400.00 85.28HOUSING REHAB BALANCE SHEET CONTRACTS PAYABLEBERG, CINDY 85.28 4,077.50REILLY BUDGET OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICEBERGERSON CASWELL INC 4,077.50 6.42HOUSING REHAB BALANCE SHEET CONTRACTS PAYABLEBLACKSTONE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN 6.42 500.00HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESBLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MN 500.00 196.69INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESBOBIER, HEIDI 196.69 1,512.50ENGINEERING G & A ENGINEERING SERVICESBOLTON & MENK INC 1,512.50 171.66PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYBOYER TRUCK PARTS 171.66 1,828.00GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A LANDBRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 1,828.00 150.00HUMAN RESOURCES TRAINING REVENUEBURNSVILLE, CITY OF 150.00 741.00OPERATIONSRADIO COMMUNICATIONSCALHOUN TOWERS APTS 741.00 6,107.90ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL SERVICESCAMPBELL KNUTSON PROF ASSOC 7.75EXCESS PUBLIC LAND LEGAL SERVICES 30.00SUNSET RIDGE LEGAL SERVICES 30.00GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 210.00STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 240.00WATER UTILITY G&A LEGAL SERVICES 6,625.65 City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 4 3/28/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:41:46R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 4Page -Council Check Summary 3/24/2012 -3/10/2012 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 162.50GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESCARR, JOE & DONNA 162.50 953.32IT G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICECARTRIDGE CARE 953.32 474.69TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENTCDW GOVERNMENT INC 474.69 3,799.24DISCOUNT LOAN PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESCENTER ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT 3,799.24 2,471.48FACILITY OPERATIONS HEATING GASCENTERPOINT ENERGY 1,149.30PARK MAINTENANCE G & A HEATING GAS 131.10WESTWOOD G & A HEATING GAS 179.72NATURALIST PROGRAMMER HEATING GAS 4,995.80WATER UTILITY G&A HEATING GAS 196.09REILLY G & A HEATING GAS 222.99SEWER UTILITY G&A ELECTRIC SERVICE 104.50SEWER UTILITY G&A HEATING GAS 9,450.98 7,369.93FACILITY OPERATIONS HEATING GASCENTERPOINT ENERGY SERVICES IN 4,515.83ENTERPRISE G & A HEATING GAS 11,885.76 10,150.00EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S OTHER RETIREMENTCENTRAL PENSION FUND 10,150.00 70.99IT G & A TELEPHONECENTURY LINK 104.80COMMUNICATIONS/GV REIMBURSEABL TELEPHONE 39.42E-911 PROGRAM TELEPHONE 215.21 109.08FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESCINTAS FIRST AID & SAFETY 109.08 398.00ASSESSING G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTATCITIZENS INDEPENDENT BANK 87.97FINANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 40.00FINANCE G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 36.48FINANCE G & A MEETING EXPENSE City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 5 3/28/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:41:46R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 5Page -Council Check Summary 3/24/2012 -3/10/2012 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 20.54-CAPITAL REPLACEMENT B/S DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 722.59TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 1,264.50 4,400.00UNINSURED LOSS G&A UNINSURED LOSSCOATES ROOFING INC 4,400.00 93.35INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESCOLBORN, CHRISTINE 93.35 4.51BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICECOMCAST 4.51 7,473.85EMERGENCY REPAIR GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP S 7,473.85 220.00PUBLIC WORKS G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSCONSTRUCTION BULLETIN 220.00 14,261.76PARK IMPROVE BALANCE SHEET RETAINED PERCENTAGECOOL AIR MECHANICAL INC 14,261.76 110.00ORGANIZED REC G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSCOSTCO WHOLESALE MEMBERSHIP 110.00WESTWOOD G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 220.00 240.00ELECTRICAL SYSTEM MTCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICECUMMINS NPOWER LLC 240.00 150.00BASKETBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESCURRAN-MOORE, KIM 150.00 11,891.78WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESDAKOTA SUPPLY GROUP 11,891.78 42.95GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SUPPLYDALCO ENTERPRISES INC 42.95 250.00BASKETBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESDEAN, ARTHUR 250.00 74.80GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE LICENSESDEPT LABOR & INDUSTRY City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 6 3/28/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:41:46R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 6Page -Council Check Summary 3/24/2012 -3/10/2012 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 3,984.68INSPECTIONS G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 4,059.48 9.62PATCHING-PERMANENT EQUIPMENT PARTSDISCOUNT STEEL INC 9.62 10,339.93PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDIDJ ELECTRIC SERVICES INC 10,339.93 8,687.07GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURESDLR GROUP KKE 8,687.07 892.54SUPPORT SERVICES G&A POSTAGEDO-GOOD.BIZ INC 892.54 45.00SEWER UTILITY G&A LICENSESEDDIHI, ISMAIL 45.00 110.00INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESEDWARDS, CHRISTINA 110.00 350.00HOUSING REHAB BALANCE SHEET CONTRACTS PAYABLEELIOT VIEW NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN 350.00 40.62PUBLIC WORKS G & A MEETING EXPENSEELLINGSON, JUDY 40.62 33.00INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESENROOTH, ELIN 33.00 5,440.00NETWORK SUPPORT SERVICES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESESP SYSTEMS PROFESSIONALS INC 5,440.00 35,561.41SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS RECYCLING SERVICEEUREKA RECYCLING 35,561.41 57.58PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYFACTORY MOTOR PARTS CO 57.58 12.50VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIESFASTENAL COMPANY 12.50 City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 7 3/28/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:41:46R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 7Page -Council Check Summary 3/24/2012 -3/10/2012 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 385.92ICE RESURFACER MOTOR FUELSFERRELLGAS 385.92 2,607.20SEWER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESFOTH INFRASTRUCTURE & ENVIRONM 2,607.20 212.50GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESFROEMEL & MARK LEBLANC, GLEN 212.50 125.00BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICEGENEREUX FINE WOOD PRODUCTS 125.00 1,350.00BASKETBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESGHIZONI, DAVE 1,350.00 4,361.77EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S LONG TERM CARE INSURGLTC PREMIUM PAYMENTS 4,361.77 2,000.00ESCROWSPMC ESCROWGOONETILLEKE, LAKNATH 2,000.00 457.85WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEGRAINGER INC, WW 457.85 445.20EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A HEALTH INSURANCEGROUP HEALTH INC - WORKSITE 445.20 1,259.31EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A TUITIONHAGEN, DENNIS 1,259.31 1,828.25GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURESHALLBERG ENGINEERING INC 1,828.25 6,610.91WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIESHAWKINS INC 6,610.91 197.54WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESHEGNA, JESSICA 197.54 50.00BASKETBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESHENDERSON, TRACY 50.00 City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 8 3/28/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:41:46R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 8Page -Council Check Summary 3/24/2012 -3/10/2012 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 2,240.00POLICE G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEHENNEPIN COUNTY INFO TECH 832.00OPERATIONSRADIO COMMUNICATIONS 256.00OPERATIONSEMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 3,328.00 6,001.00ADMINISTRATION G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEHENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 20.00ADMINISTRATION G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 20.00FINANCE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 1,123.53POLICE G & A SUBSISTENCE SERVICE 7,164.53 59.00OPERATIONSTRAININGHENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE 59.00 94.50GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICEHILL CO, ROBERT B 94.50 5.53-PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH DUE TO OTHER GOVTSHOLDAHL COMPANY 86.00PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 80.47 176.71GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESHOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 48.56ROUTINE MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 53.05PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 19.87WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 30.52WATER UTILITY G&A SMALL TOOLS 71.67WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT PARTS 650.80WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 38.95SEWER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 35.34SEWER UTILITY G&A SMALL TOOLS 23.34STORM WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,148.81 86.33WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESHOME DEPOT CREDIT SRVCS 86.33 47.00PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESHSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 18.01WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 30.97ADULTS 18 - 54 GENERAL SUPPLIES 95.98 78.26PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYI-STATE TRUCK CENTER City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 9 3/28/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:41:46R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 9Page -Council Check Summary 3/24/2012 -3/10/2012 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 78.26 1,595.20EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S UNION DUESI.U.O.E. LOCAL NO 49 1,595.20 281.51INSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESICC 281.51 25.00INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSICE SKATING INST AMERICA 25.00 862.87WATER UTILITY G&A POSTAGEIMPACT PROVEN SOLUTIONS 862.87SEWER UTILITY G&A POSTAGE 862.87SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS POSTAGE 862.86STORM WATER UTILITY G&A POSTAGE 3,451.47 283.53WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICEINDELCO 283.53 425.08PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYINVER GROVE FORD 1,436.57GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 1,861.65 65.00HUMAN RESOURCES TRAININGIPMA-HR MINNESOTA 65.00 371.29WATER UTILITY G&A BUILDING MTCE SERVICEJ & F REDDY RENTS 371.29 5.76PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYJERRY'S HARDWARE 15.35PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 21.11 34.73PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESJOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES/LESCO 34.73 54.67WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICEJOHN HENRY FOSTER MN 54.67 50.00INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESKARCHER-RAMOS, AMBER 50.00 City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 10 3/28/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:41:46R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 10Page -Council Check Summary 3/24/2012 -3/10/2012 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 276.92EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S WAGE GARNISHMENTSKELLER, JASMINE Z 276.92 114.60GREENSBORO HIA LEGAL SERVICESKENNEDY & GRAVEN 126.00WESTWOOD VILLAS HIA LEGAL SERVICES 240.60 546.75-WATER UTILITY BALANCE SHEET RETAINED PERCENTAGEKEYS WELL DRILLING CO 10,935.00CONSTRUCTION PAYMENTS IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 10,388.25 263.89WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERSKLANE, MURRAY 263.89 743.18WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERSKLEIN BANK 743.18 4,380.00ESCROWSPMC ESCROWKLINGBELL, ERIC 4,380.00 35.00GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESKRESS, LON 35.00 164.00INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESKURDYUMOVA, YELENA 164.00 240.00RELAMPINGOTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESLARSON, JH CO 240.00 2,268.00EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S UNION DUESLAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES 2,268.00 255.45GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIESLAWSON PRODUCTS INC 255.45 43,799.00EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A League of MN Cities dept'l expLEAGUE OF MN CITIES INSURANCE 1,092.20UNINSURED LOSS G&A UNINSURED LOSS 44,891.20 302.25INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESLENTNER, LAURA 302.25 City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 11 3/28/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:41:46R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 11Page -Council Check Summary 3/24/2012 -3/10/2012 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 688.28PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESLIGHTING HOUSE USA INC 1,806.94MUNICIPAL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 2,495.22 167.42PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYLITTLE FALLS MACHINE INC 167.42 48,211.36IT G & A COMPUTER SERVICESLOGIS 7,316.00TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 55,527.36 2,604.79GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICELUPIENT CHEVROLET OF BLOOMINGT 2,604.79 155.35INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESMACGREGOR-HANNAH, MAREN 155.35 1,434.00PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYMACQUEEN EQUIP CO 2,033.42GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 3,467.42 1,945.55-WATER UTILITY BALANCE SHEET RETAINED PERCENTAGEMAGNEY CONSTRUCTION INC 38,911.00CONSTRUCTION PAYMENTS IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 36,965.45 203.21PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A OFFICE SUPPLIESMARS CO, W P & R S 203.21 412.50VOLLEYBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESMETRO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS 412.50 32.16WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIESMICRO CENTER 32.16 84.45IT G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESMID AMERICA BUSINESS SYSTEMS 800.00IT G & A OFFICE EQUIPMENT 884.45 38.31POLICE G & A REPAIRSMIDWEST BADGE & NOVELTY CO 38.31 City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 12 3/28/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:41:46R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 12Page -Council Check Summary 3/24/2012 -3/10/2012 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 305.00WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESMIDWEST TESTING LLC 305.00 368.40PAWN FEES OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESMINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPT 368.40 1,225.00WATER UTILITY G&A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTATMINNESOTA AWWA 1,225.00 61.99POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIESMINNESOTA CHIEFS POLICE ASSOC 61.99 5.00POLICE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSMINNESOTA CRIME PREVENTION ASS 5.00 21,558.00WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESMINNESOTA DEPT HEALTH 160.00WATER UTILITY G&A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 21,718.00 111.80SUPPORT SERVICES G&A OFFICE SUPPLIESMINUTEMAN PRESS 111.80 2,435.00PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDIMOST DEPENDABLE FOUNTAINS 2,435.00 1,635.12COMMUNICATIONS/GV REIMBURSEABL EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEMOTOROLA 1,635.12 271.00VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSMPCA 345.00WATER UTILITY G&A LICENSES 1,230.00REILLY BUDGET LICENSES 1,846.00 100.00POLICE G & A TRAININGMSANI 100.00 934.22PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYMTI DISTRIBUTING CO 934.22 500.00YOUTH PROGRAMS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESMUNCY, MATTHEW 500.00 City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 13 3/28/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:41:46R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 13Page -Council Check Summary 3/24/2012 -3/10/2012 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 120.00ASSESSING G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTATMUNICIPALS 120.00FINANCE G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 120.00INSPECTIONS G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 360.00 28,179.73PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDIMUSCO SPORTS LIGHTING LLC 28,179.73 250.00REILLY BUDGET OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESMVTL LABORATORIES 250.00 325.00OPERATIONSTRAININGMYHRE, JOHN 325.00 20.84SNOW PLOWING EQUIPMENT PARTSNAPA (GENUINE PARTS CO) 1,167.54PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORY 34.97BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 209.20VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,432.55 3,870.00GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESNATL AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER CO 3,870.00 21,600.00TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENTNEXGEN UTILITY MANAGEMENT 21,600.00 29,667.84SANDING/SALTING OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESNORTH AMERICAN SALT CO 29,667.84 644.72PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYNORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 644.72 23,884.73TASK FORCE GRANTS - STATENORTHWEST METRO DRUG TASK FORC 23,884.73 500.00POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESOAK KNOLL ANIMAL HOSPITAL 500.00 53.42HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICE SUPPLIESOFFICE DEPOT 42.50GENERAL INFORMATION OFFICE SUPPLIES 197.09POLICE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 106.09INSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 14 3/28/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:41:46R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 14Page -Council Check Summary 3/24/2012 -3/10/2012 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 263.70PUBLIC WORKS G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 88.47ORGANIZED REC G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 109.47WESTWOOD G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 2.66HOUSING REHAB G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 863.40 1,540.80INSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESOFFICE TEAM 1,540.80 860.77SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHEROLSEN CHAIN & CABLE CO INC 860.77 85.50OFF-LEASH DOG PARK OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESON SITE SANITATION 85.50 167.65EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESOPTUM HEALTH FINANCIAL SERVICE 167.65 69.03HOUSING REHAB BALANCE SHEET CONTRACTS PAYABLEPANNELL, LISA 69.03 80.75INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESPARR, MELISSA 80.75 3,000.00PERFORMING ARTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESPERNSTEINER CREATIVE GROUP INC 3,000.00 240.00BASKETBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESPETERSEN, CHRISTA 240.00 159.14WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICEPLANT & FLANGED EQUIPMENT 159.14 1,338.97INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESPOLK, MARLA 1,338.97 1,438.29PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYPOMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC 1,438.29 605.00SUPPORT SERVICES G&A POSTAGEPOSTMASTER 605.00 City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 15 3/28/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:41:46R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 15Page -Council Check Summary 3/24/2012 -3/10/2012 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 144.00ICE RESURFACER EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEPRINTERS SERVICE INC 144.00 77.43VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A POSTAGEQUICKSILVER EXPRESS COURIER 77.43 530.45WATER UTILITY G&A LICENSESRAILROAD MANAGEMENT COMPANY II 530.45 353.99ENGINEERING G & A CLOTHING AND TOOL ALLOWANCERED WING SHOE STORE 353.99 450.00MOVE-UP PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESREHKAMP LARSON ARCHITECTS INC 450.00 899.78GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDIRESTWELL MATTRESS CO 899.78 687.95GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICESAFELITE FULFILLMENT INC 687.95 1,000.00ESCROWSPMC ESCROWSALMELA, PAUL 1,000.00 43.17ORGANIZED REC G & A MEETING EXPENSESAM'S CLUB 43.17 184.00INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESSANDUM, KATHERINE 184.00 156.00INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESSAURER, MARTI 156.00 582.10BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESSCAN AIR FILTER INC 582.10 10.00ADMINISTRATION G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESSHRED-IT 10.00FINANCE G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50.00POLICE G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 10.00OPERATIONSGENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 80.00 City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 16 3/28/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:41:46R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 16Page -Council Check Summary 3/24/2012 -3/10/2012 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 180.00HUMAN RESOURCES SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSSHRM 180.00 33.13GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIESSIGN PRODUCERS INC 33.13 68.00POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIESSIRCHIE FINGER PRINT LABS INC 68.00 1,345.92EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S UNION DUESSLP ASSOC OF FIREFIGHTERS #993 1,345.92 76.00HOUSING REHAB G & A TRAININGSLUC 76.00 1,000.00HOLIDAY PROGRAMS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESSMP PRODUCTIONS 1,000.00 9,791.00PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDISPORTS TECHNOLOGY INC 9,791.00 262.21STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESSPS COMPANIES INC 262.21 103.00COMM DEV PLANNING G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSST LOUIS PARK SUNRISE ROTARY 103.00 22.16OPERATIONSGENERAL SUPPLIESSTEMMER, LUKE 22.16 62.00INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESSTEPHENS, TARA 62.00 2,368.29PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYSTONEBROOKE EQUIPMENT INC 2,368.29 362.50GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESSTROMBECK, WAYNE 362.50 900.00PE DESIGN IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDISUMMIT ENVIROSOLUTIONS INC 21,656.25REILLY BUDGET GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 22,556.25 City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 17 3/28/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:41:46R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 17Page -Council Check Summary 3/24/2012 -3/10/2012 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 173.83ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL NOTICESSUN NEWSPAPERS 173.83 2,467.50HOLIDAY PROGRAMS GENERAL SUPPLIESTEMPLE DISPLAY LTD 2,467.49PARK MAINTENANCE G & A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 4,934.99 4,203.70TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENTTHE FOUNDATION 4,203.70 750.00HUMAN RESOURCES ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENTTHOMAS & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING 750.00 199.50ADMINISTRATION G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESTIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL 199.50 84.66INSPECTIONS G & A ELECTRICALTOMMY'S ELECTRIC 84.66 350.00GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESTSATSOS, GEORGE & STEPHANIE 350.00 246.00SNOW PLOWING OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESTWIN CITY OUTDOOR SERVICES INC 4,140.00SSD 1 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,458.00SSD 3 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,844.00 30.00ADMINISTRATION G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTATTWIN WEST CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 30.00 386.00ELECTRICAL SYSTEM MTCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICEUHL CO INC 386.00 24.58POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIESUNIFORMS UNLIMITED (PD) 2,772.87POLICE G & A POLICE EQUIPMENT 71.09SUPPORT SERVICES OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 1,228.51SUPERVISORYOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 1,190.16PATROLOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 174.72RESERVESOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 5,461.93 City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 18 3/28/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:41:46R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 18Page -Council Check Summary 3/24/2012 -3/10/2012 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 150.00EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S WAGE GARNISHMENTSUNITED STATES TREASURY 150.00 180.00EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S UNITED WAYUNITED WAY OF MINNEAPOLIS AREA 180.00 175.00ENVIRONMENTAL G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTATUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA REGIST 175.00 120.00POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESUNO DOS TRES COMMUNICATIONS 120.00 548.00HUMAN RESOURCES RECRUITMENTUS HEALTH WORKS MEDICAL GROUP 548.00 357.95HUMAN RESOURCES RECOGNITIONVAIL, LORI 357.95 8,020.19WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICEVALLEY-RICH CO INC 8,020.19 1,900.00BROOMBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESVICE, GARY 1,900.00 41.56PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYWALSER CHRYSLER JEEP 41.56 5,110.84SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS MOTOR FUELSWASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN 60,087.30SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE 25,117.38SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS YARD WASTE SERVICE 26,266.89SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE 116,582.41 425.00BASKETBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESWELDON, DAN 425.00 120.00SUPPORT SERVICES OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESWEST PAYMENT CENTER 120.00 122.77SPECIAL PROJECTS BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIESWHEELER HARDWARE 122.77 City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 19 3/28/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:41:46R55CKSUM LOG23000VO 19Page -Council Check Summary 3/24/2012 -3/10/2012 Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object 10,990.62FACILITY OPERATIONS ELECTRIC SERVICEXCEL ENERGY 22.77OPERATIONSELECTRIC SERVICE 29,209.65PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE 3,804.22PARK MAINTENANCE G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE 33.69BRICK HOUSE (1324)ELECTRIC SERVICE 60.17WW RENTAL HOUSE (1322)ELECTRIC SERVICE 883.99GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 22,814.89WATER UTILITY G&A ELECTRIC SERVICE 22.03OPERATIONSELECTRIC SERVICE 1,799.16REILLY BUDGET ELECTRIC SERVICE 2,673.22SEWER UTILITY G&A ELECTRIC SERVICE 701.63STORM WATER UTILITY G&A ELECTRIC SERVICE 195.16OPERATIONSELECTRIC SERVICE 73,211.20 27,389.11PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYYOCUM OIL CO INC 27,389.11 998.04PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESYOUNGBLOOD LUMBER CO 998.04 636.36MOVE-UP PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESZIP PRINTING 636.36 69.47ADMINISTRATION G & A MEETING EXPENSEZWILLING, JAMES 146.11COMM & MARKETING G & A TELEPHONE 215.58 Report Totals 839,852.45 City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 4h) Subject: Vendor Claims Page 20 Meeting Date: April 2, 2012 Agenda Item #: 4i MINUTES St. Louis Park Housing Authority Westwood Room, St. Louis Park City Hall St. Louis Park, MN Wednesday, February 8, 2012, 5:00 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioners Catherine Courtney, Renee DuFour, Trinicia Hill MEMBERS ABSENT: Commissioners Justin Kaufman, Suzanne Metzger STAFF PRESENT: Jane Klesk, Kathy Larsen, Kevin Locke, Michele Schnitker 1. Call to Order – The meeting was called to order at 5:08 p.m. 2. Approval of Minutes for December, 2011 The Board minutes of December 14, 2011 were unanimously approved. 3. Hearings – None 4. Reports and Committees – None 5. Unfinished Business – None 6. New Business a. Recognition of Trinicia Hill, Resolution No. 610 Commissioner Courtney read aloud Resolution No. 610 recognizing retiring Commissioner Trinicia Hill, and the Board thanked her for her dedicated service to the St. Louis Park Housing Authority. Commissioner DuFour moved to approve Resolution No. 610, Resolution of the Housing Authority of St. Louis Park Recognizing Contributions and Expressing Appreciation to Trinicia Hill. Commissioner Hill seconded the motion and the motion passed 3-0. b. 2012 CDBG Proposed Allocation Ms. Larsen updated the Board on the 2012 proposed allocation of CDBG funds, explaining that the City Council had received the proposal at the January 23rd meeting. Commissioner DuFour stated her desire that funding be allocated to low income housing for emergency repairs, rather than non-profit organization facility improvement. Commissioner DuFour requested that staff obtain details from STEP on their use of an award from the 2011 CDBG allocation. c. 2011 Housing Activity Report Ms. Larsen presented the 2011 Housing Activity Report which provides a semi- annual update on the City’s housing programs and includes the Housing Matrix, a table enumerating St. Louis Park’s housing types and tenure. No action is required. City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No.4i) Page 2 Subject: Housing Authority Meeting Minutes of February 8, 2012 d. Approval of Contract for Financial Services By and Between the Housing Authority of St. Louis Park and City of St. Louis Park Ms. Schnitker requested that the Board approve a financial services contract with the City Finance department through the end of fiscal year 2012, while staff works with Finance over the next several months to determine the viability of an accounting firm providing financial services for the HA. Commissioner DuFour moved to authorize the Chair and Executive Director to enter into the agreement, City of St. Louis Park and St. Louis Park Housing Authority Financial Services Contract for the term March 31, 2012 through December 31, 2012, in the amount of $40,265. Commissioner Hill seconded the motion, and the motion passed 3-0. e. Approval of Public Housing Budget Fiscal Year Ending December 31, 2012, Resolution No. 611 Ms. Schnitker reviewed the annual Public Housing Operating Budget for fiscal year ending December 31, 2012, required by HUD to support PH program operation. This is the first budget since the HA transitioned to a new fiscal year running concurrent with the calendar year, HUD’s funding cycle and the City’s budgeting cycle. Commissioner DuFour moved to approve Resolution No. 611, PHA Board Resolution Approving Operating Budget, and Commissioner Hill seconded the motion; the motion passed 3-0. f. Civil Rights Certification, Resolution No. 612 Ms. Schnitker stated that HUD requires the HA to annually certify that it will affirmatively further fair housing within its programs, identify any impediments to fair housing and address those impediments. Commissioner DuFour moved to approve Resolution No. 612, Civil Rights Certification, and Commissioner Hill seconded the motion; the motion passed 3-0. 7. Communications from Executive Director a. Claims List – January and February, 2012 b. Communications 1. Monthly Report – January and February, 2012 2. Draft Financial Statements – December, 2011 8. Other 9. Adjournment Commissioner Hill moved to adjourn the meeting, and Commissioner DuFour seconded the motion. The motion passed 3-0. The meeting adjourned at 6:06 p.m. Respectfully submitted, _____________________ Renee DuFour, Secretary Meeting Date: April 2, 2012 Agenda Item #: 4j City of St. Louis Park Human Rights Commission Minutes – February 21, 2012 Westwood Room, City Hall I. Call to Order Chair Johnson called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. A. Roll Call Commissioners Present: Joseph Glaab, Emily Goldstein, Brian Johnson and Mary Tomback Staff: Marney Olson and Amy Stegora-Peterson Guests: Rashmi Seneviratne, PAC, Jenni Walker and Karen Westling B. Approval of Agenda It was moved by Commissioner Tomback, seconded by Commissioner Glaab, to approve the agenda as presented. The motion passed 4-0. C. Approval of Minutes It was moved by Commissioner Glaab, seconded by Commissioner Tomback, to approve the minutes of January 17, 2012, as presented. The motion passed 4-0. II. Commissioner and Committee Reports A. Individual commissioner and staff reports Ms. Walker and Ms. Westling, Minnesota Youth for Human Rights, discussed a kit put together for Educators to use for educating children about human rights. The kit includes PSA’s, information on the story of human rights and booklets. It simplifies the information and makes it easier to understand for children. Ms. Olson asked if the video could be put on the local cable access channel? Ms. Walker replied yes, it is already being shown in train stations in New York. They invited Commissioners to an open house on March 17th for Minnesota Youth for Human Rights. Ms. Olson noted there are several openings for new commissioners and City Council is doing interviews. They hope to have new commissioners for the next meeting. III. Anti-Bullying Project • Sub-committee/Task Force • HRC’s role City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No.4j) Page 2 Subject: Human Rights Commission Meeting Minutes of February 21, 2012 Ms. Olson stated that she and Commissioners Tomback and Johnson met with the District Parent Advisory Council (DPAC) about partnering on an anti-bullying project. DPAC had been discussing doing something around bullying as well. They talked about how much interest there was and what it would look like. It was decided to have two representatives from HRC and PAC and four from DPAC as steering committee. Those members would go back to each commission and further collaborate. This is not about policy change in the schools. The objectives would be to develop common language (what is a bully?), educating and building awareness. They would then hopefully do an education event, film screen discussion and determine what other tools they have to connect people with resources/tools (web site, agencies). They can tap into the school liaisons and look into the resources. The biggest thing is the film. The committee will work on what happens after that. There will be quite a bit of interest. City Council is very supportive. They are working out how frequently they will meet and the commitment. Commissioner Goldstein said that she talked to the Vice Principal at the high school who said they couldn’t do anything unless there is physical harm. Commissioner Tomback stated after this process the schools might like what the commission does and decide to change. Commissioner Johnson indicated they wanted to raise awareness and get people talking. The goal is once they do the initial viewing is to have separate meetings and address all facets of bullying beyond kids. Commissioner Tomback noted the materials could go along with the Diversity Lens. Ms. Olson noted the Superintendent is aware and supportive. If they do a definition and the school adopts that, it may incite policy change. Ms. Olson stated the next step is to identify people who are interested from the Commissions, determine the frequency of the meetings and the commitment. IV.Planning for 2012 – Work Plan Ms. Olson stated that she made the changes discussed at the last meeting. The annual report went to City Council and they have invited the Commission back to the April 9th meeting and to get feedback. She and the Chair will attend. V.New Business - None VI.Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 7:43 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Amy L. Stegora-Peterson Recording Secretary Meeting Date: April 2, 2012 Agenda Item #: 5a Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance Presentation Other: Boards and Commissions EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other: Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other: TITLE: Appointment of Citizen Representative to Boards and Commissions. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Appoint Citizen Representative John Hall as a commissioner to the Police Advisory Commission (PAC) to fill a term which expires December 31, 2012. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the Council wish to appoint this individual to the Police Advisory Commission for the term listed above? BACKGROUND: City Council interviewed Mr. Hall on February 21, 2012. Though the Police Advisory Commission was not one of Mr. Hall’s preferences, Council requested staff to contact him to determine if he was interested in serving on PAC. Mr. Hall indicated that he is interested. If appointed, Mr. Hall will serve the remainder of a term which was vacated by Cindy Hoffman, who resigned to accept her recent appointment to the Telecommunications Advisory Commission. This term expires on December 31, 2012. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. VISION CONSIDERATION: Appointing diverse citizen representatives who volunteer as commissioners to the various Boards and Commissions assures St. Louis Park is consistent with the Council’s Strategic Direction of being a connected and engaged community. Prepared by: Kay Midura, Office Assistant Reviewed by: Nancy Stroth, City Clerk Approved by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director Meeting Date: April 2, 2012 Agenda Item #: 8a Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance Presentation Other: EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other: Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other: TITLE: Recreational Fire Permit Fee. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution approving a Recreational Fire Permit fee of $25.00. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the Council agree with implementing a Recreational Fire Permit fee of $25.00? BACKGROUND: Staff provided the City Council reports on changes being considered to the Recreational Fire Permit process in both the 12/12/11 and 3/5/12 Study Sessions. It was the consensus of Council to move ahead with the fee and Fire Department staff is now ready to implement these changes. Currently, city ordinance allows for recreational fire burning by permit, which is administered by the Fire Department at no cost to the applicant. Recreational permits are good from the date of issue until December 31st each year. With the advent and popularity of portable fire pits and other wood burning, smoke producing appliances over the last decade, more and more annual permits have been requested and the number of complaints has risen. To combat the increase in complaints, the Fire Department has increased staff time to thoroughly go over the regulations with each and every permit holder. In 2011 the Fire Department issued 698 recreational fire permits. Below is a chart of permits issued over the last seven years. As can be seen, the number of permits that have been issued has increased considerably since 2005: Year # Permits Issued 2005 270 2006 302 2007 313 2008 470 2009 548 2010 628 2011 698 Listed below are some examples of concerns and/or complaints on burning we received that in some cases led to fires being extinguished and in some cases, permits being revoked. • Burning to close to a structure or property line • Burning construction materials, garbage, furniture, brush and leaves • Burning tree stumps with lighter fluid • Oversized fires • Fires left unattended • In 2011 an unattended, unpermitted recreational fire resulted in a neighbor’s garage catching on fire. City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 8a) Page 2 Subject: Recreational Fire Permit Fee The Fire Department believes that the number of complaints could be substantially reduced by requiring site drawings, showing the proposed location for the fire pit or appliance on the property, conducting site inspections to ensure proper setbacks are met, and educating permit applicants to ensure compliance with State and City fire code regulations. In order to recoup the cost associated with issuing the permit a $25.00 permit fee is proposed for a permanent permit. By issuing a permanent permit the extensive administrative time involved in issuing permits annually would be reduced significantly. Please note that issuing ongoing permits does not prohibit the City from revoking permits due to non-compliance. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Charge a $25.00 recreational fire permit fee. The fee amount was determined based on the property inspection taking approximately 30 minutes, plus administrative processing and record keeping time. This will reduce future staff time in the issuing of annual permits and reviewing regulations with permit holders. VISION CONSIDERATION: Educate recreational fire permit holders of burning only clean, dry firewood in order to maintain a safer and cleaner recreational fire environment for the residents of St. Louis Park. By providing permits and education this supports the Vision area: St. Louis Park is committed to being a leader in environmental stewardship. We will increase environmental consciousness and responsibility in all areas of city business. Attachments: Resolution Prepared by: Cary Smith, Assistant Chief Reviewed by: Luke Stemmer, Fire Chief Approved by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 8a) Page 3 Subject: Recreational Fire Permit Fee RESOLUTION NO. 12-_____ RESOLUTION ADOPTING NEW RECREATIONAL FIRE PERMIT FEE OF $25.00 WHEREAS, the City Ordinance 14-75 requires a recreational fire permit, WHEREAS, to minimize staff time in the issuance of approximately 700 recreational fire permits annually and educate residents on the regulations and safe practices, WHEREAS, the City Council is in consensus to implement a recreational fire permit fee of $25.00; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park that the Recreational Fire Permit fee of $25.00 is hereby accepted. Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council April 2, 2012 City Manager Mayor Attest: City Clerk Meeting Date: April 2, 2012 Agenda Item #: 8b Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance Presentation Other: EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other: Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other: TITLE: Hoigaard Village – PUD Major Amendment for a Modification to the Adagio Building. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution approving the Major Amendment to the Planned Unit Development. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the Council find that the proposed modifications to the approved Hoigaard Village development plan meet the requirements for approval of a PUD Major Amendment? BACKGROUND: Requested is a Major Amendment to the Hoigaard Village Planned Unit Development (PUD) for a change to the Adagio building. The PUD amendment would allow the total density on the site to increase from 374 to 416 residential units. The amendment would primarily affect the Adagio building site, including modifications to the architectural design and materials, an increase in the building’s height from 44 feet to 60 feet, and modifications to the site layout and Designed Outdoor Recreation Area (DORA). The building footprint and other site design elements remain consistent with the original PUD approval. The City Council has already reviewed the proposed changes to the Adagio building in its role as the City’s Economic Development Authority; the proposed changes to the PUD formalize the changes to the site plan and building elevations and would allow the developer to move forward to obtain a building permit for construction. The Major Amendment is required because the proposed changes have an impact on the building’s height, density, and off-street parking requirement. The criteria for approval of a PUD include whether the proposal has a high standard of site and building design; more efficient and effective use of streets and utilities; a more creative and efficient use of land; and preservation and enhancement of desirable site characteristics. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed PUD amendment. No one was present to speak, and they voted to recommend approval. Minutes are attached for review. Development Background: The Hoigaard Village development was originally approved in 2005. It included four phases of development: • Harmony Vista. The 5-story, mixed-use building has 25,000 square feet of commercial space on the first floor and 74 apartment units above. The Harmony Vista building was completed in 2008. It was built as a condominium building, but was converted to market-rate apartments due to adverse conditions in the for-sale housing market. Harmony Vista has parking available below the building for residents, and a surface City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 8b) Page 2 Subject: Hoigaard Village – PUD Major Amendment for a Modification to the Adagio Building parking lot behind the building and a surface lot to the east of the building for the use of commercial tenants. • The Camerata Apartments. A 4-story apartment building with 220 units, the Camerata was completed in 2009. The apartment building includes underground parking and a structured parking ramp to the east of the building. • The Adagio. The Adagio building was originally conceived as a 4-story, 58-unit condominium building. The current request is for approval of a 5-story, 100-unit apartment building. Parking for the Adagio would be provided underground. • The Medley Row Townhomes. There are no changes proposed to the original 3-story, 22-unit design for the Medley Row Townhomes, which would be constructed concurrently with the Adagio building. The townhomes would each feature an individual garage accessed via a shared alley behind the buildings. The site preparation for the Adagio and Medley Row was completed during the construction of Harmony Vista and the Camerata. The two sites are already graded for development, and utilities were installed to include water and sewer services. The large stormwater pond on the site, which benefits many properties upstream from the Hoigaard Village development, was completed in 2007-2008. Zoning and Planned Unit Development Analysis: The Planned Unit Development (PUD) application was originally approved in 2005. The Hoigaard Village development applied for PUD approvals to allow for construction of a complex development on a complex site. Through the combination of multiple parcels and the demolition of several aging and obsolete structures, the developer was able to move forward with construction of a project that would work as a unified whole. The PUD request allowed for modifications to required setbacks, and combination of the site for purposes of calculating density and for the construction of major shared site amenities such as DORA, the stormwater pond, and the private open space area located at the pond’s western edge. There are four primary changes associated with this request for a Major Amendment to the PUD: • Overall development density • Off-street parking • Designed Outdoor Recreation Area (DORA) • Architectural design of the proposed Adagio building Overall Development Density The density of the original Hoigaard Village development called for a total of 374 housing units for an overall site density of 37 units per acre. The proposed changes would increase the number of units within the Adagio building from 58 to 100, bringing the total number of units on site to 416. With a site size of approximately 10 acres, the density increases to 42 units per acre. The maximum permitted density is 50 units per acre in the RH Zoning District; with a PUD, a density increase could be requested to allow up to 75 units per acre. The overall project density remains within the Zoning Ordinance limits for the RH district. The proposed development density would be allowed even without a PUD. Off-Street Parking Increasing the number of units in the Adagio building has a minimal impact on the overall PUD parking requirement. This is because of a reduction in the total number of two bedroom units in City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 8b) Page 3 Subject: Hoigaard Village – PUD Major Amendment for a Modification to the Adagio Building the building, and because of a change in how off-street parking requirements are calculated from the time of the original proposal in 2005 to today. The original proposal included 58 units; of those, 25 were two bedroom units, and 33 were one bedroom units. The new proposal includes a total of 100 units, with 16 two bedroom units and 84 one bedroom units. At the time of the initial proposal, the Zoning Ordinance required a total of two parking spaces per unit. For the 58-unit Adagio building, this meant the requirement was for 116 off-street parking spaces. A reduction in the total number of required off-street parking spaces was approved as part of the PUD, and the building was planned for construction with 98 underground parking spaces and access to on-street and adjacent parking areas for short-term or guest parking. Revisions to the Zoning Ordinance in late 2006 modified the multi-family parking requirement from two spaces per unit to one space per bedroom. Under the revised parking requirements, the 58-unit Adagio building would have been required to provide for 83 spaces. The current proposal includes a total of 116 bedrooms, for a parking requirement of 116 off- street parking spaces. There are 100 underground parking spaces are proposed below the revised Adagio building. The Zoning Ordinance also allows immediately adjacent on-street parking to be counted as available parking. There are 28 on-street parking spaces immediately adjacent to the Adagio building, bringing the total number of available parking spaces to 128. The total available parking exceeds the Zoning Ordinance requirement and is consistent with the original PUD approval. Off-Street Parking Requirement Zoning Requirement Reductions Total Parking Requirement Total Parking Provided Approved Adagio Building 2 spaces per unit 20% PUD reduction (23 spaces) 58 units – 116 spaces With reduction – 93 spaces 98 spaces – underground Proposed Adagio Building 1 space per bedroom None 116 bedrooms – 116 spaces 100 spaces - underground 28 spaces – adjacent on- street From a practical standpoint, it is possible to review the parking situation on the site today with occupied housing units. The 294 units that have been constructed to-date within the Hoigaard Village development have occasionally used some of the available on-street parking within the site, primarily on weekend nights when tenants are most likely to have guests. The surface parking lot on the site’s eastern edge has been infrequently used; although it is dedicated predominately to future tenants of the commercial space in the Harmony Vista building, it is available for overflow parking during off-peak hours. There are no known complaints or neighborhood issues with parking occurring off the Hoigaard Village site. The total parking requirement at the time the Hoigaard Village development was approved was for 716 spaces. The development provided 749 spaces in all underground and surface parking lots and on-street. The proposed changes increase the total number of spaces provided to 751. The bicycle parking requirement is for 110 spaces to serve the Adagio building. Bicycle parking will be provided in the underground vehicle parking area and adjacent to the building. The City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 8b) Page 4 Subject: Hoigaard Village – PUD Major Amendment for a Modification to the Adagio Building project architects are revising the plans to include the bicycle parking prior to City Council action. Designed Outdoor Recreation Area (DORA) DORA is provided throughout the Hoigaard Village site. The largest portion of DORA on the site surrounds the Camerata apartment building, where a recreational trail connects the rear portion of the building to a trail that traverses around the stormwater pond and connects to the private open space area to the west of the pond. Neither the pond itself nor any sidewalks on the site count toward the DORA total. The current PUD amendment would increase the DORA space by approximately 7,000 square feet. The outdoor amenities at the Adagio would be similar to those provided at the Camerata. The Adagio’s space would be predominately enclosed by the building, creating a secure semi- private space for residents of both the Adagio and Harmony Vista. The enclosed outdoor space includes a pool, options for outdoor grilling, and a small putting green. Increasing the DORA at the Adagio building brings the overall DORA for the development to 71,451 square feet. This represents 17.2% of the entire development site and exceeds the City’s requirement to provide 12% of the total site for DORA. The outdoor recreation area provided at the Camerata is a successful and well used example of a highly functional DORA space. There, the 2006 revisions called for an outdoor space that would be surrounded by the apartment building, and would include a pool and other recreational amenities. The success and high level of use of that space suggest that similar amenities at the Adagio building would also be successful and valued by future residents. The Adagio DORA area is pictured below. Architectural Design The original design for the Adagio building met the Zoning Ordinance requirement for Class I materials through the use of brick, glass, and some fiber cement siding. The building was to be four stories (44 feet) in height and would have been topped off with a traditional hipped roof. The revised proposal increases the building height to five stories and 60 feet; to better match the 65-foot Harmony Vista building, it is proposed to have a flat roof. The building will feature a parapet to screen any rooftop mechanical equipment and to highlight the building’s design. City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 8b) Page 5 Subject: Hoigaard Village – PUD Major Amendment for a Modification to the Adagio Building Since the Hoigaard Village development was originally approved, the City has studied the use of fiber cement siding (also called cementitious siding or hardiboard) and adopted specific Zoning Ordinance regulations for its use. It is permitted as a Class I material for up to 10% of the total Class I requirement. The proposed Adagio design meets the City’s architectural design standards for Class I materials through the use of brick, glass and fiber cement siding. Per the Zoning Ordinance requirement, the fiber cement siding is counted for only 10% of the Class I total. The architectural design for the Medley Row Townhomes is proposed to remain as originally approved, depicted in the attachments. Landscaping & Tree Replacement The Hoigaard Village development was approved in 2005, and approximately 18 months later the City adopted major changes to how landscaping requirements are calculated within the Zoning Ordinance. Based on the “bufferyard” requirements, the approved development provides “570 plant units” and “770 total units” of landscaping, generally represented by trees and other landscape elements like screening fences and walls. The revisions to the Adagio site include changes to its landscaping to allow for the increase in DORA. The approved plans call for 43 trees and no shrubs; the proposed changes include 27 trees and 118 shrubs. The previous landscaping requirements, with an emphasis on total plant units, did not require as many shrubs as the required by the current Zoning Ordinance. The proposed landscaping revisions are in compliance with the approved PUD and increase the site’s conformity to current regulations. Were the Hoigaard Village development site vacant today, many of the existing amenities would count as alternative landscaping, possibly reducing the overall landscaping requirement. Alternative landscape elements already provided on the site include public art in the private open space west of the stormwater pond, public art funded by the developer along W. 36th Street, opportunities for outdoor gathering spaces throughout the development, benches both along W. 36th Street and internal to the development, and native plantings in many appropriate locations, Adagio – Original Design Adagio – Proposed Design City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 8b) Page 6 Subject: Hoigaard Village – PUD Major Amendment for a Modification to the Adagio Building including those installed within the stormwater pond to increase its aesthetic value to the development. Setbacks The approved PUD included a reduction in setbacks throughout the entire site, including both the Adagio and Medley Row. The revisions to the Adagio building conform to the originally approved setback reductions. Park and Trail Dedication The original approval documents call for the developer to pay the Park Dedication fees and the Trail Dedication fees prior to issuance of each building permit as the site developed. For this reason, these fees are required prior to issuance of a building permit. These fee amounts, on a per-unit basis, have not increased since the time of original approvals and remain at $1,500 per unit for Park Dedication and $225 per unit for Trail Dedication. Public Works / Engineering Review The City Engineer has reviewed the plans, and noted that the water service for the Adagio building was installed while street work was completed to serve the Harmony Vista building. Due to the increased number of units in the building, a review of the size of the water service has been requested. A condition has been included to ensure the building meets the requirements of the City Engineer. Part of the construction plan for the Adagio building and the Medley Row townhomes calls for the closure of W. 35th Street during construction, for use as a staging area. Closing this segment of W. 35th Street has no impact on adjacent properties, and it does not serve as a through-street, so there are no off-site impacts. Adequate access to the Camerata apartment building is provided via Xenwood Ave. S., and via the internal private streets within the development. The City Engineer has requested that the financial security, to be held by the City during construction, include funds to ensure that the street is repaired should any damage occur during the staging process for the new buildings. Planning Commission Comments The Planning Commission discussed the proposed amendment and raised some concerns regarding the additional height of the revised Adagio building. The additional units and floor will raise the height from approximately 44 feet to approximately 60 feet; as a result, the shading profile of the building changes. To address this issue the project architects have included an exhibit, attached, that depicts how shading would occur between the Adagio building and Medley Row. The shading is within the allowable standards of the Zoning Ordinance. Summary: Revisions to the plans for the Hoigaard Village development will modify the total development density and the design of the Adagio building. The plans conform to the underlying Zoning District requirements as approved in the original Planned Unit Development approval from 2005. The density of development on the site will increase from approximately 37 units per acre to approximately 42 units per acre, remaining below the maximum 75 units per acre permitted through the use of a PUD. If approved, the developer intends to move forward with construction in the summer of 2012. The Planning Commission and Staff recommend approval of the Major Amendment to the PUD. City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 8b) Page 7 Subject: Hoigaard Village – PUD Major Amendment for a Modification to the Adagio Building FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: None. VISION CONSIDERATION: The proposed changes to the Hoigaard Village development fit within the Strategic Direction adopted by the Council in 2007 to provide a well-maintained and diverse housing stock. Attachments: Resolution – Major Amendment to the Planned Unit Development Draft Minutes – Planning Commission Meeting of March 7, 2012 Location Map Site Plan and Related Documents Prepared by: Adam Fulton, Planner Reviewed by: Meg McMonigal, Planning and Zoning Supervisor Kevin Locke, Community Development Director Approved by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 8b) Page 8 Subject: Hoigaard Village – PUD Major Amendment for a Modification to the Adagio Building RESOLUTION NO. 12-____ Amends and Restates Resolution No. 06-157 A RESOLUTION AMENDING AND RESTATING RESOLUTION NO. 06-157 ADOPTED ON OCTOBER 3, 2006 APPROVING A FINAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT UNDER SECTION 36-367 OF THE ST. LOUIS PARK ORDINANCE CODE RELATING TO ZONING TO ALLOW SITE PLAN MODIFICATIONS AND AN INCREASE IN DENSITY FOR PROPERTY ZONED M-X MIXED USE AND R-C MULTI- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOCATED AT 5600 36TH STREET WEST 5655 35TH STREET WEST 5650 35TH STREET WEST 5600 CAMERATA WAY WHEREAS, Adagio Apartments, LLC has made application to the City Council for a major amendment to a Final Planned Unit Development (Final PUD) under Section 36-367 of the St. Louis Park Ordinance code to allow site plan modifications and an increase in project density at 5600 36th Street West, 5655 35th Street West, 5650 35th Street West, and 5600 Camerata Way within the M-X Mixed Use and R-C Multi-Family Residential Zoning Districts having the following legal description, to-wit: Lot 1, Block 1, Hoigaard Village Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the information related to Planning Case No. 12-04-PUD and the effect of the proposed site plan modifications and increase in density on the health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan; and compliance with the intent of the Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a Final PUD was approved regarding the subject property pursuant to Resolution No. 06-157 of the St. Louis Park City Council dated October 3, 2006 which contained conditions applicable to said property; and WHEREAS, due to changed circumstances, amendments to those conditions are now necessary, requiring the amendment of that Final PUD; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of this resolution to continue and restate the conditions of the permit granted by Resolution No. 06-157, to add the amendments now required, and to consolidate all conditions applicable to the subject property in this resolution; and WHEREAS, the contents of Planning Case Files 05-62-PUD, 06-60-PUD, and 12-04- PUD are hereby entered into and made part of the public hearing and the record of decision for this case. Conclusion NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Resolution No. 06-157 (document not filed) is hereby restated and amended by this resolution which continues and amends a Final City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 8b) Page 9 Subject: Hoigaard Village – PUD Major Amendment for a Modification to the Adagio Building Planned Unit Development to the subject property for the purpose of permitting site plan modifications within the M-X Mixed Use and R-C Multi-Family Residential Zoning Districts at the location described above based on the following conditions: 1. The site shall be developed, used and maintained in conformance with the Final PUD official exhibits. 2. The following maximum and minimum requirements, as indicated in the official exhibits, shall apply to the PUD: a. The mixed-use building along West 36th Street shall have: i. A maximum of 74 residential units. ii. A minimum of 105 enclosed parking spaces. iii. A minimum of 25,000 square feet of retail space. iv. A minimum of 584 square feet of underground bicycle storage space. v. Second floor balconies shall remain open. No accessory structures, whether permanent or temporary in nature, shall be allowed. b. The condominium building south of West 35th-1/2 Street shall have: i. A maximum of 58 residential units. ii. A minimum of 103 enclosed parking spaces. c. The row houses shall have: i. A maximum of 22 residential units. ii. A minimum of 44 enclosed parking spaces. d. The apartment building shall have: i. A maximum of 220 residential units. ii. A minimum of 180 enclosed parking spaces. 3. Modifications to the Zoning Code are approved as follows: a. Setback modifications as shown on the official site plan, allowing deductions in setback requirements outlined in the staff report. b. A 15% reduction from the required off-street parking spaces. 4. Conditions for the approval of the Planned Unit Development, to be included in the Development Agreement between the City and the Developer, are as follows: a. Developer agrees to provide the site for the regional stormwater pond and pay 25% of the cost of its construction. b. Developer agrees to contribute $85,000 for public art in the central green area and along 36th Street West. c. Developer agrees to provide at least 17% of the development for Designed Outdoor Recreation Area. d. Developer agrees to hold harmless the City and remediate any environmental contamination found on any part of the redevelopment site. e. Developer agrees to place any on-site utilities underground. f. Developer agrees to enter into a maintenance agreement for the continued maintenance of the streetscape along 36th Street West. g. Developer agrees to provide a snow-removal agreement with the City to ensure all snow is removed to an off-site location during major snow events. City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 8b) Page 10 Subject: Hoigaard Village – PUD Major Amendment for a Modification to the Adagio Building 5. Prior to starting any site work, the following conditions shall be met: a. Assent form and official exhibits must be signed by applicant and owner. b. A preconstruction conference shall be held with the appropriate development, construction and city representatives. c. A staging plan for demolition and construction shall be filed with the City. d. All necessary permits must be obtained. 6. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for the Mixed-Use Building along 36th St. W. and the Condominium Building south of 35-1/2 St. W., the developer shall: a. Sign a Development Contract b. Financial guarantees shall be in place. c. Building and architectural screening materials samples and colors must be submitted to an approved by the Zoning Administrator. 7. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for the rowhouses or apartment building, the developer shall: a. Obtain all necessary approvals, including approval of the final plat for this phase of the redevelopment. b. Remove the smokestack and any related contamination. c. Complete any necessary environmental remediation. d. Remove the billboard located on the site. e. Building and architectural screening materials samples and colors must be submitted to an approved by the Zoning Administrator. 8. Prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy, as-built drawings of the relocated public utilities shall be submitted to and approved by the Director of Public Works. 9. Fire lanes shall be in accordance with the official exhibits. 10. Any modifications to the site plan resulting from the construction of Highway 100 shall require a Minor Amendment to the PUD. 11. Prior to the installation of any signs, including temporary signs or new sign faces, a sign plan must be approved by the Zoning Administrator and sign permits must be obtained. 12. All roof-top equipment shall be screened from off-site views per Ordinance requirements. 13. The following façade design guidelines shall be applicable to all ground floor, non- residential facades located in the Mixed-Use building facing West 36th Street: a. Façade Transparency. Windows and doors shall meet the following requirements: i. For street-facing facades, no more than 10% of total window and door area shall be glass block, mirrored, spandrel, frosted or other opaque glass, finishes or material including window painting and signage. The remaining 90% of window and door area shall be clear or slightly tinted glass, allowing views into and out of the interior. ii. Visibility into the space shall be maintained for a minimum of 3 feet. This requirement shall not prohibit the display of merchandise. Display windows may be used to meet the transparency requirement. City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 8b) Page 11 Subject: Hoigaard Village – PUD Major Amendment for a Modification to the Adagio Building b. Awnings. i. Awnings must be constructed of heavy canvas fabric, metal and/or glass. Plastic and vinyl awnings are prohibited. ii. Backlit awnings are prohibited. c. Use of Sidewalk. A business may use that portion of a sidewalk extending a maximum of 5 feet from the building wall for the following purposes, provided an 8 foot minimum horizontal clearance along West 36th Street is maintained between obstructions on the sidewalk: i. Display of merchandise. ii. Benches, planters, ornaments and art. iii. Signage, as permitted in the zoning ordinance. iv. Dining areas may extend beyond the 5 foot maximum, provided a 12 foot minimum horizontal clearance along West 36th Street is maintained between the obstructions on the sidewalk. 14. The developer shall comply with the following conditions during construction: a. All City noise ordinances shall be complied with, including that there be no construction activity between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. b. Loud equipment shall be kept as far as possible from residences at all times. c. The site shall be kept free of dust and debris that could blow onto neighboring properties. d. Public streets shall be maintained free of dirt and shall be cleaned as necessary. e. The Zoning Administrator may impose additional conditions if it becomes necessary in order to mitigate the impact of construction on surrounding properties. 15. The Planned Unit Development shall be amended on October 3, 2006 to incorporate all of the preceding conditions and add the following conditions: a. The site shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with the official exhibits; such documents incorporated by reference herein. b. In the event of any conflict between the Contract for Private Redevelopment and any Planned Unit Development requirements, the Contract for Private Redevelopment shall prevail. c. The amount of required Designed Outdoor Recreation Area, as required in condition 4 (a) of this document, shall be reduced to 15.5%. d. Setback modifications from condition 3 (a) of this document shall be permitted in accordance with the Official Site Plan approved October 3, 2006. 16. The Planned Unit Development shall be amended on April 2, 2012 to incorporate all of the preceding conditions and add the following conditions: 1. The site shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with the Official Exhibits dated February 6, 2012. 2. The Major Amendment increases the total units within the PUD to 416 as a result of the Adagio building increasing from 58 to 100 units. City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 8b) Page 12 Subject: Hoigaard Village – PUD Major Amendment for a Modification to the Adagio Building 3. The developer shall submit a financial security in the form of cash escrow or letter of credit in the amount of 125% of the costs of public sidewalk and trail installation, repair/cleaning of public streets/utilities including W. 35th Street, and tree replacement/landscaping. 4. A total of 110 bicycle parking spaces are required at the Adagio building. Bicycle parking may be provided internally and externally. 5. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, the Utility Plan shall be revised as required by the City Engineer to ensure adequate water service is provided to the Adagio building. 6. The landscape plans shall be revised to remove all Norway Maples from the planting plan, to be replaced by a species acceptable to the City’s Environmental Coordinator. 7. The development agreement shall be amended to reflect the site plan modifications and other proposed changes to the PUD. 8. Park Dedication and Trail Dedication fees shall be provided to the City prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition to any other remedies, the developer or owner shall pay an administrative fee of $750 per violation of any condition of this approval. Assent form and official exhibits must be signed by applicant (or applicant and owner if applicant is different from owner) prior to issuance of building permit. Approval of a Building Permit, which may impose additional requirements. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council April 2, 2012 City Manager Mayor Attest: City Clerk City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 8b) Page 13 Subject: Hoigaard Village – PUD Major Amendment for a Modification to the Adagio Building UNOFFICIAL MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA March 7, 2012 – 6:00 p.m. COUNCIL CHAMBERS A. Hoigaard Village – Major Amendment to the PUD Location: W. 36th Street and Highway 100 Applicant: Adagio Apartments, LLC Case No.: 12-04-PUD Adam Fulton, Planner, reviewed the Hoigaard Village development, and the requested change of the Adagio building from 58 to 100 units. He explained that the amendment would change the overall development density, off-street parking, the Designed Outdoor Recreation Area (DORA), and the architectural design of the proposed Adagio building. Vice-Chair Carper asked about the increased height of the Adagio and shading on the townhouses. Mr. Fulton responded that as the Adagio building is part of the larger PUD, and the developer has studied shading and determined it has been addressed through the design of the Adagio. Commissioner Johnston-Madison asked if the applicant could bring a shading study to the City Council presentation. Mr. Fulton said the architect would be able to address shading. Noah Bly, Urban Works Architecture, gave a presentation on the Adagio building. He stated that they have a shade study video which could be available for the City Council meeting. Vice-Chair Carper opened the public hearing. The Vice-Chair closed the public hearing as there was no one present wishing to speak. Commissioner Robertson said he felt the Adagio design was very good but he was concerned about how the owner occupied/rental mix had changed from the original plans for the development. He said he understood the current market and added that the project will be here a long time and the original intent was not for 100% rental. Commissioner Robertson said even if the units are easily converted for owner occupied, the owner occupied units would total only 5%. He added that he was a participant in the Elmwood Study which emphasized a strong owner occupied component for this campus. He said based on that, he could not get behind the proposal. Commissioner Morris said he agreed with Commissioner Robertson’s comments. He asked if the city is catering to the current market and forgetting the vision for the future markets. Conversion to condos is not a popular process. He said he was inclined to City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 8b) Page 14 Subject: Hoigaard Village – PUD Major Amendment for a Modification to the Adagio Building vote in favor of the request, while expressing his personal reservation that the city isn’t sticking to its goals. Mr. Fulton noted that the City Council has looked at the owner vs. rental component. One of the factors regards the redevelopment contract. The developer is contractually obligated to move forward on the project within a certain timeframe. The effort to construct something marketable at this time requires construction of apartments. Frank Dunbar, the developer, spoke about the first building constructed, Harmony Vista, with 74 condominium units which currently are rental due to market conditions. He said it will be a greater financial benefit to the company to sell the units. He added that as stated in the redevelopment contract those units will become owner units when that is possible. Mr. Dunbar said the company has experience in conversion when the market has required it. The design is easily adaptable. The objective of the development is to go back to ownership. The product is a first grade development that will market well now and in the future. Commissioner Morris asked about street ownership in the development. Mr. Fulton responded that there are two private streets in the development. The site is bordered by 36th St. on the south, Glenwood Ave. on the west, and by Webster on the east. A private street serves Medley Row and the Camerata building. The private streets are owned and held by the developer. These streets are available for public access and appropriate easements are in place for those purposes. Xenwood Ave. is planned as the main artery to access the development. A signal plan at 36th & Xenwood ultimately will be constructed in a few years. Commissioner Morris made a motion to recommend approval of the Major Amendment to the PUD, subject to conditions. Commissioner Johnston-Madison seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 4-0. Hoigaard Village PUD - Major AmendmentW. 36th St. and Highway 100 March 1, 2012 Zoning Classification R1 - Single Family Residential R2 - Single Family Residential R3 - Two Family Residential R4 - Multi-Familiy Residential RC - Multi-Family Residential POS - Parks and Open Space MX - Mixed-Use C1 - Neighborhood Commercial C2 - General Commercial O - Office IP - Industrial Park IG - General Industrial 270 Feet R-4 M-X I-P C-2 I-P I-P R-C R-2 City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 8b) Subject: Hoigaard Village – PUD Major Amendment for a Modification to the Adagio Building Page 15 SAINT LOUIS PARK, MN | 03.05.2012 | 08-0040 Adagio Apartments 1 03.28.2007 CONCEPTUAL NORTH ELEVATION City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 8b) Subject: Hoigaard Village – PUD Major Amendment for a Modification to the Adagio Building Page 16 SAINT LOUIS PARK, MN | 03.05.2012 | 12-0008 Hoigaard Village Development 1 CONCEPTUAL BIRDS EYE VIEW City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 8b) Subject: Hoigaard Village – PUD Major Amendment for a Modification to the Adagio Building Page 17 SAINT LOUIS PARK, MN | 03.05.2012 | 12-0008 Hoigaard Village Development 1 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 8b) Subject: Hoigaard Village – PUD Major Amendment for a Modification to the Adagio Building Page 18 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN | 03.22.2012 | 12-0008The Adagio1OCTOBER SHADOW STUDYCity Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 8b) Subject: Hoigaard Village – PUD Major Amendment for a Modification to the Adagio BuildingPage 19 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN | 03.22.2012 | 12-0008The Adagio2NOVEMBER SHADOW STUDYCity Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 8b) Subject: Hoigaard Village – PUD Major Amendment for a Modification to the Adagio BuildingPage 20 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN | 03.22.2012 | 12-0008The Adagio3DECEMBER SHADOW STUDYCity Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 8b) Subject: Hoigaard Village – PUD Major Amendment for a Modification to the Adagio BuildingPage 21 City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 8b) Subject: Hoigaard Village – PUD Major Amendment for a Modification to the Adagio BuildingPage 22 8'-0"100099098 36955 SF101 SF301 SF156 SF927 SF435 SF144 SF511 SFPARKINGGARAGE001ELEVATORLOBBY002TRASHROOM003ELEVATOREQUIPMENT004ELECTRICALROOM006GAS METERSWEST007STAIR ASTAIR BMECHANICAL012ELECTRICALMETERS010WATERSERVICE011COMPACTGENERAL NOTES:1.DIMENSIONS AT EXTERIOR WALLS ARE TO OUTSIDE FACE OF SHEATHING2.DIMENSIONS AT INTERIOR WALLS ARE TO CENTERLINE OF WALL3.DIMENSIONS AT UNIT DEMISING ARE TO CENTERLINE OF WALLS4.EXTEND ALL SHAFTS TO UNDERSIDE OF ROOF SHEATHING OR TOP OF ROOFPENETRATIONS WHERE APPLICABLE5.ALL RESIDENTIAL DEMISING WALLS ARE TYPE V3, V3A, AND V6 1HR FIRERATING, WITH ACOUSTIC RATING6.ALL RESIDENTIAL CORRIDOR WALLS ARE TYPE W6, 1 HR FIRE RATING, WITHACOUSTIC RATING - UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED7.ALL UNITS ARE TYPE B ACCESSIBLE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED8.MAINTAIN 8'-2" MIN. AND 8'-6" MIN. CLEAR HEIGHT AT PARKING AREAS INDICATEDON PLANS, ALL OTHER PARKING AREAS SHALL PROVIDE 7'-2" MIN. CLEAR HEIGHT9.DIMENSIONS @ CMU ARE TO FACE OF CMUKEYNOTES:23456789101112BCDEF1A401A3001A3002A3003A3004MATCHLINEMATCHLINE824 SFPOOL ABOVE006213 SFPOOL MECHANICAL002568 SFTRASH004132 SFELEV LOBBY003135 SFELECT. SERVICE265313 SFWATER SERVICE007117' - 11 1/4"23' - 0 7/8"26' - 10"26' - 10"25' - 4"18' - 4"26' - 10"25' - 4"26' - 10"26' - 10"26' - 10"18' - 7 3/4"8' - 2 1/4"15' - 1 3/4"9' - 9 5/8"17' - 0"27' - 0"30' - 0"27' - 0"16' - 11 1/4"COMPACTCOMPACTEXISTING PARKING RAMP17' - 0"27' - 0"30' - 0"27' - 0"16' - 11 1/4"6883243311' - 11 7/8"1312.5TRANS.22' - 0"58' - 0"58' - 0"111410' - 4 3/4"15' - 11 1/8"11' - 11 7/8"8"114ACOMPACTCOMPACTCOMPACTCOMPACT304'-11 1/4"117'-11 1/4"11GEN.GARAGEINTAKEGARAGE EXHAUST ABOVE18'-0"22'-0"18'-0"18'-0"22'-0"18'-0"901 North 3rd Street, Suite 145Minneapolis, MN 55401612.455.3100 (t)612.455.3199 (f)copyright © 2010 by UrbanWorks Architecture LLC# Date DescriptionREVISIONSDATEPROJECT #PHASEDRAWN BYCHECKED BYPRELIMINARYNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONSt. Louis Park, MN2/6/201208-0040PUD AMENDMENTDPSLBNSUBLEVEL 1 -OVERALLPLANA001.0ADAGIO ATHOIGAARDVILLAGE 1/16" = 1'-0"A001.0SUBLEVEL 1 PLAN - OVERALL1City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 8b) Subject: Hoigaard Village – PUD Major Amendment for a Modification to the Adagio BuildingPage 23 DNDNUPMedley Row(Private Street per Doc. No.4528237) (See Note 1c)CBAPPROX LOC. OF STORM SEWER PER CITY PLANSRAISED WALKPLANTERPLANTERLOWER LEVELBLDG WALLLOWER LEVELBLDG WALLAPPROXLOC 6" DIP35th Street WestDNGENERAL NOTES:1.DIMENSIONS AT EXTERIOR WALLS ARE TO OUTSIDE FACE OF SHEATHING2.DIMENSIONS AT INTERIOR WALLS ARE TO CENTERLINE OF WALL3.DIMENSIONS AT UNIT DEMISING ARE TO CENTERLINE OF WALLS4.EXTEND ALL SHAFTS TO UNDERSIDE OF ROOF SHEATHING OR TOP OF ROOFPENETRATIONS WHERE APPLICABLE5.ALL RESIDENTIAL DEMISING WALLS ARE TYPE V3, V3A, AND V6 1HR FIRERATING, WITH ACOUSTIC RATING6.ALL RESIDENTIAL CORRIDOR WALLS ARE TYPE W6, 1 HR FIRE RATING, WITHACOUSTIC RATING - UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED7.ALL UNITS ARE TYPE B ACCESSIBLE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED8.MAINTAIN 8'-2" MIN. AND 8'-6" MIN. CLEAR HEIGHT AT PARKING AREAS INDICATEDON PLANS, ALL OTHER PARKING AREAS SHALL PROVIDE 7'-2" MIN. CLEAR HEIGHT9.DIMENSIONS @ CMU ARE TO FACE OF CMUKEYNOTES:A30331A401A3011A3013A3022A3021A3001A3002A3003A3004POOL1:20 SIDEWALKACCESSIBLE ROUTE 1:20PATIOEXISTING HARMONY VISTAEXISTING HARMONY VISTA PARKINGRAMP DOWN TO PARKINGTRASH ENCLOSURETRANS.GARAGE EXHAUST FANS1065 SF2 UNIT260887 SF1 UNIT +268733 SF1 UNIT270733 SF1 UNIT272746 SF1 UNIT274889 SF1 UNIT +2591133 SF2 UNIT271805 SF1 UNIT261950 SF1 UNIT +2881058 SFACTIVITY283963 SFFITNESS279472 SFTHEATER281812 SF1 UNIT +257805 SF1 UNIT +258888 SF1 UNIT +2691064 SF2 UNIT289889 SF1 UNIT +273732 SF1 UNIT282732 SF1 UNIT28015'-11 1/4"11'-11 3/4"11'-11 3/4"10'-5 1/2"14'-11 3/4"10'-8 1/2"15'-5"10'-9 1/4"5'-0"5'-0"5'-0"SEE CIVIL FOR GRADING AND PAVING PLANS; SEE LANDSCAPE FORPROPOSED PLANTINGGREEN ROOF PLAZA OVER PARKING WITH INTERNAL DRAINS; SEELANDSCAPE FOR PLANTINGEXTENT OF PROPOSED GARAGE BELOW; 8" FROM PROPERTY LINEFRENCH BALCONYCONCRETE SIDEWALKCONCRETE SIDEWALKCONCRETE SIDEWALKGEN.APPROXIMATEPROPOSEDEASEMENT103'-7 1/2"304'-10 1/4"103'-2 3/4"UNIT PATIOUNIT PATIOUNIT BALCONY,TYP. AT PERIMETEREXISTING CMU WALL AT PARKING PERIMETER4'-0"4'-0"43'-11 3/4"63'-7 1/4"901 North 3rd Street, Suite 145Minneapolis, MN 55401612.455.3100 (t)612.455.3199 (f)copyright © 2010 by UrbanWorks Architecture LLC# Date DescriptionREVISIONSDATEPROJECT #PHASEDRAWN BYCHECKED BYPRELIMINARYNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONSt. Louis Park, MN2/6/201208-0040PUD AMENDMENTDPSLBNLEVEL 1 PLAN- OVERALLA101.0ADAGIO ATHOIGAARDVILLAGE 1/16" = 1'-0"A101.0LEVEL 1 PLAN OVERALL1City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 8b) Subject: Hoigaard Village – PUD Major Amendment for a Modification to the Adagio BuildingPage 24 UPDNUPDNGENERAL NOTES:1.DIMENSIONS AT EXTERIOR WALLS ARE TO OUTSIDE FACE OF SHEATHING2.DIMENSIONS AT INTERIOR WALLS ARE TO CENTERLINE OF WALL3.DIMENSIONS AT UNIT DEMISING ARE TO CENTERLINE OF WALLS4.EXTEND ALL SHAFTS TO UNDERSIDE OF ROOF SHEATHING OR TOP OF ROOFPENETRATIONS WHERE APPLICABLE5.ALL RESIDENTIAL DEMISING WALLS ARE TYPE V3, V3A, AND V6 1HR FIRERATING, WITH ACOUSTIC RATING6.ALL RESIDENTIAL CORRIDOR WALLS ARE TYPE W6, 1 HR FIRE RATING, WITHACOUSTIC RATING - UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED7.ALL UNITS ARE TYPE B ACCESSIBLE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED8.MAINTAIN 8'-2" MIN. AND 8'-6" MIN. CLEAR HEIGHT AT PARKING AREAS INDICATEDON PLANS, ALL OTHER PARKING AREAS SHALL PROVIDE 7'-2" MIN. CLEAR HEIGHT9.DIMENSIONS @ CMU ARE TO FACE OF CMUKEYNOTES:23456789101112BCDEF1A401A3001A3002A3003A3004OPEN TOBELOW1312.5114A1065 SF2 UNIT303887 SF1 UNIT +304733 SF1 UNIT306733 SF1 UNIT308746 SF1 UNIT309729 SF1 UNIT319732 SF1 UNIT313732 SF1 UNIT322889 SF1 UNIT +3151067 SF2 UNIT317883 SF1 UNIT +314912 SF1 UNIT +320939 SF1 UNIT +321880 SF1+ UNIT312752 SF1 UNIT311752 SF1 UNIT3101150 SF2 UNIT307950 SF1 UNIT +318805 SF1 UNIT305889 SF1 UNIT +3021090 SF2 UNIT29923456789101112BCDEF1A401A3001A3002A3003A30041066 SF2 UNIT229887 SF1 UNIT +233733 SF1 UNIT234733 SF1 UNIT235743 SF1 UNIT236879 SF1 UNIT +300727 SF1 UNIT242732 SF1 UNIT243732 SF1 UNIT246889 SF1 UNIT +2471068 SF2 UNIT248886 SF1 UNIT +249880 SF1 UNIT +245752 SF1 UNIT2401150 SF2 UNIT238881 SF1 UNIT +230805 SF1 UNIT231950 SF1 UNIT +232752 SF1 UNIT244939 SF1 UNIT +241912 SF1 UNIT +2671312.5114A901 North 3rd Street, Suite 145Minneapolis, MN 55401612.455.3100 (t)612.455.3199 (f)copyright © 2010 by UrbanWorks Architecture LLC# Date DescriptionREVISIONSDATEPROJECT #PHASEDRAWN BYCHECKED BYPRELIMINARYNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONSt. Louis Park, MN2/6/201208-0040PUD AMENDMENTDPSLBNLEVEL 2 & 3PLAN -OVERALLA102.0ADAGIO ATHOIGAARDVILLAGE 1/16" = 1'-0"A102.0A102.0 - LEVEL 2 PLAN - OVERALL1 1/16" = 1'-0"A102.0A103.0 - LEVEL 3 PLAN - OVERALL2City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 8b) Subject: Hoigaard Village – PUD Major Amendment for a Modification to the Adagio BuildingPage 25 St. Louis Park, Minnesota Hoigaard Village Medley Row Townhomes PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION DATE:REG. NO.: TJC RGE 05378.00 12-11-07 901 N 3rd Ave Suite 145 Minneapolis, MN 55401 # Date Description REVISIONS DATE PROJECT # PHASE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY copyright © 2005 by UrbanWorks Architecture LLC 612.455.3100 (t) 612.455.3199 (f) NAME: 27031 THOMAS J. CESARE 6-5-07 PRELIMINARY DESIGN 10-26-07 BID SET 11-08-07 ADDENDUM #1 12-11-07 12-11-07 ADDENDUM #2 UTILITY PLAN C2.0 City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 8b) Subject: Hoigaard Village – PUD Major Amendment for a Modification to the Adagio Building Page 26 St. Louis Park, Minnesota Hoigaard Village Medley Row Townhomes PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION DATE:REG. NO.: TJC RGE 05378.00 12-11-07 901 N 3rd Ave Suite 145 Minneapolis, MN 55401 # Date Description REVISIONS DATE PROJECT # PHASE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY copyright © 2005 by UrbanWorks Architecture LLC 612.455.3100 (t) 612.455.3199 (f) NAME: 27031 THOMAS J. CESARE 6-5-07 PRELIMINARY DESIGN 10-26-07 BID SET 11-08-07 ADDENDUM #1 12-11-07 12-11-07 ADDENDUM #2 GEOMETRIC AND PAVING PLAN C3.0 City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 8b) Subject: Hoigaard Village – PUD Major Amendment for a Modification to the Adagio Building Page 27 City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 8b) Subject: Hoigaard Village – PUD Major Amendment for a Modification to the Adagio BuildingPage 28 City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 8b) Subject: Hoigaard Village – PUD Major Amendment for a Modification to the Adagio BuildingPage 29 WHWHUPWHWHUPWHUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHUPPUMP ROOM 1P1PUMP ROOM 3P321' - 0"21' - 0"21' - 0"21' - 0"21' - 0"21' - 0"21' - 0"21' - 0"1A4013A4011A4022A4023A402SASBNBNAS2S3S4S5S6S7S8S9S1N2N3N4N5N6N7N8N9N13A451A3014A3011A3013A3031A3034A3012A30331' - 0"1' - 4"9' - 0"4' - 8"6' - 10"1' - 10"9' - 4"2' - 4"7' - 0"1' - 10"9' - 4"2' - 4"7' - 0"1' - 10"9' - 4"2' - 4"7' - 0"1' - 10"9' - 4"2' - 4"7' - 0"1' - 10"9' - 4"2' - 4"7' - 0"1' - 10"9' - 4"2' - 4"5' - 5"1' - 11"5' - 5"4' - 8"9' - 0"1' - 4"1' - 0"2' - 8"1' - 4"9' - 0"4' - 8"14' - 0"10' - 4"9' - 0"4' - 8"14' - 0"10' - 4"1' - 4"1' - 0"1' - 11"5' - 5"4' - 8"9' - 0"1' - 0"1' - 4"9' - 0"4' - 8"6' - 10"6"1' - 10"9' - 4"2' - 4"7' - 0"6"1' - 10"9' - 4"2' - 4"7' - 0"6"1' - 10"9' - 4"2' - 4"7' - 0"6"1' - 10"9' - 4"2' - 4"7' - 0"6"1' - 10"9' - 4"2' - 4"7' - 0"6"1' - 10"9' - 4"2' - 4"5' - 5"2' - 1"A1521A15114A45221' - 0"21' - 0"21' - 0"21' - 0"21' - 0"21' - 0"21' - 0"21' - 0"21' - 0"21' - 0"21' - 0"21' - 0"21' - 0"21' - 0"21' - 0"21' - 0"168' - 0"168' - 0"1' - 0"1' - 4"9' - 0"4' - 8"14' - 0"8' - 4"2' - 0"3' - 6"2' - 4"38' - 0"39' - 5"38' - 0"2' - 4"A30322' - 4"UNIT 1UNIT 2UNIT 3UNIT 4UNIT 5UNIT 6UNIT 7UNIT 8UNIT 22UNIT 21UNIT 20UNIT 19UNIT 18UNIT 17UNIT 16UNIT 1515R16R15R16R16R16R15R16R16R15R15R15R17R15R17R15R2' - 0"8' - 4"14' - 0"4' - 8"9' - 0"1' - 4"3' - 6"4A452SimTYPTYPPROPERTY LINESEGMENTEDRETAINING WALLSEE LANDSCAPECONC WALL &STAIR, SEELANDSCAPESEGMENTEDRETAINING WALLSEE LANDSCAPEP3P194' - 0"94' - 0"94' - 10"95' - 6"96' - 2"97' - 2"98' - 6"99' - 6"99' - 6"98' - 6"97' - 10"96' - 10"96' - 2"95' - 10"95' - 6"95' - 2"99' - 11"98' - 11"98' - 3"97' - 3"96' - 7"96' - 3"95' - 11"95' - 7"99' - 11"98' - 11"97' - 7"96' - 7"95' - 11"95' - 3"94' - 5"94' - 5"GENERAL NOTES:1.EXTERIOR DIMESNIONS TO EXTERIOR FACE OF SHEATHING.2.INTERIOR DIMENSIONS TO OUTSIDE FACE OF GYPSUM WALL BOARD.3.ALL UNIT DEMISING WALLS PARTITIONS SHALL BE TYPE 'V3'(1 HOUR RATED), UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED.4.ALL INTERIOR UNIT WALLS PARTITIONS SHALL BE TYPE'P4', UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.AREA 1901 North 3rd Street, Suite 145Minneapolis, MN 55401612.455.3100 (t)612.455.3199 (f)I hereby certify that this plan,specification, or report wasprepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I ama duly Licensed Architect underthe laws of the state ofMinnesota.SIGNEDDATELICENSE #copyright © 2006 by UrbanWorks Architecture LLC# Date DescriptionREVISIONSDATEPROJECT #PHASEDRAWN BYCHECKED BYJohn Hamilton12/11/20071421112/11/0706-0016CDWCPWCPAREA PLANBASEMENTPLAN - AREA 1A101MEDLEYROWTOWNHOMESST. LOUIS PARK,MN 1/8" = 1'-0"A101BASEMENT PLAN - AREA 11City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 8b) Subject: Hoigaard Village – PUD Major Amendment for a Modification to the Adagio BuildingPage 30 DNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNGENERAL NOTES:1.EXTERIOR DIMESNIONS TO EXTERIOR FACE OF SHEATHING.2.INTERIOR DIMENSIONS TO OUTSIDE FACE OF GYPSUM WALL BOARD.3.ALL UNIT DEMISING WALLS PARTITIONS SHALL BE TYPE 'V3'(1 HOUR RATED), UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED.4.ALL INTERIOR UNIT WALLS PARTITIONS SHALL BE TYPE'P4', UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.1A4013A4011A4022A4023A402SASBNBNAS2S3S4S5S6S7S8S9S1N2N3N4N5N6N7N8N9N13A451A3014A3011A301321' - 0"21' - 0"A3031A3034A3012A3033A1522A15124A452A1123A1122A30324A452SimUNIT 1UNIT 2UNIT 3UNIT 4UNIT 5UNIT 6UNIT 7UNIT 8UNIT 22UNIT 21UNIT 20UNIT 19UNIT 18UNIT 17UNIT 16UNIT 15PROPERTY LINETYPTYP6R5R1RDN1RDN15R15R10R10R7R7R3R3RSEGMEMNTAL RETAININGWALL, SEE LANDSCAPESEGMEMNTAL RETAININGWALL, SEE LANDSCAPECOMPOSITE WOODDECKING & STAIRSCOMPOSITE WOODDECKING & STAIRSCOMPOSITE WOODDECKING & STAIRSCOMPOSITE WOODDECKING & STAIRSCOMPOSITE WOODDECKING & STAIRSCOMPOSITE WOODDECKING & STAIRSCOMPOSITE WOODDECKING & STAIRSCOMPOSITE WOODDECKING & STAIRSCOMPOSITE WOODDECKING & STAIRSCOMPOSITE WOODDECKING & STAIRSCONC SLAB ONGRADE PATIOCONC SLAB ONGRADE PATIOCONC SLAB ONGRADE PATIOCONC SLAB ONGRADE PATIOCONC SLAB ONGRADE PATIOCONC SLAB ONGRADE PATIOTYPTYP5' - 5"4' - 0"5' - 5"4' - 8"10' - 4"20' - 5 5/8"21' - 0"21' - 0"21' - 0"21' - 0"21' - 0"21' - 0"21' - 0"21' - 0"21' - 0"21' - 0"21' - 0"21' - 0"21' - 0"21' - 0"21' - 0"38' - 0"38' - 0"A70112A70113AREA 1901 North 3rd Street, Suite 145Minneapolis, MN 55401612.455.3100 (t)612.455.3199 (f)I hereby certify that this plan,specification, or report wasprepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I ama duly Licensed Architect underthe laws of the state ofMinnesota.SIGNEDDATELICENSE #copyright © 2006 by UrbanWorks Architecture LLC# Date DescriptionREVISIONSDATEPROJECT #PHASEDRAWN BYCHECKED BYJohn Hamilton12/11/20071421112/11/0706-0016CDAuthorCheckerKEY PLANFIRST FLOORPLAN - AREA 1A111MEDLEYROWTOWNHOMESST. LOUIS PARK,MN 1/8" = 1'-0"A111A111- FIRST FLOOR PLAN - AREA 11City Council Meeting of April 2, 2012 (Item No. 8b) Subject: Hoigaard Village – PUD Major Amendment for a Modification to the Adagio BuildingPage 31 Meeting Date: April 2, 2012 Agenda Item #: 8c Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance Presentation Other: EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other: Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other: TITLE: SWLRT Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC) – Alternate Appointments. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Appoint Julie Williams as an alternate member of the SWLRT CAC. Discuss assigning a priority to the Alternates for filling in when members are absent. POLICY CONSIDERATION: • Does the City Council agree to adding Julie Williams as an additional alternate for the SWLRT CAC? • What order for alternates does the Council want to use when an alternate is needed to fill in? BACKGROUND: On March 5, 2012, the City Council appointed three members and two alternates to the Community Advisory Committee for SWLRT. Robert Tift, Bill James, and Mathew Flory were appointed as City representatives on the CAC; Kathryn Kottke and Claudia Johnston-Madison were appointed as alternate representatives to CAC. Julie Williams is a citizen of the Minikahda Oaks neighborhood, and has expressed interest in the CAC as she lives near the Beltline LRT Station. Ms. Kottke and Ms. Johnston-Madison had already been appointed as alternates, and with tonight’s approval, Ms. Williams will also be added as an alternate. CAC ALTERNATE PRIORITY: The question of how the alternates would represent member arose. The alternates will step in if a regular member is not present at the meetings. The City Council may wish to discuss having alternates be prioritized for filling in when members are absent. With three alternates, it is likely St. Louis Park will have full representation at most meetings. Staff requests direction on the ordering of the alternates. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. Prepared by: Meg J. McMonigal, Planning and Zoning Supervisor Approved by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director