HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012/02/21 - ADMIN - Agenda Packets - City Council - RegularAGENDA
FEBRUARY 21, 2012
6:15 p.m. BOARD & COMMISSION INTERVIEWS – Westwood Room
7:30 p.m. CITY COUNCIL MEETING – Council Chambers
1. Call to Order
1a. Pledge of Allegiance
1b. Roll Call
2. Presentations - None
3. Approval of Minutes
3a. City Council Meeting Minutes February 6, 2012
4. Approval of Agenda and Items on Consent Calendar
NOTE: The Consent Calendar lists those items of business which are considered to be routine and/or which need no
discussion. Consent items are acted upon by one motion. If discussion is desired by either a Councilmember or a
member of the audience, that item may be moved to an appropriate section of the regular agenda for discussion. The
items for the Consent Calendar are listed on the last page of the Agenda.
Recommended Action:
Motion to approve the Agenda as presented and items listed on the Consent Calendar; and to waive
reading of all resolutions and ordinances. (Alternatively: Motion to add or remove items from the agenda,
or move items from Consent Calendar to regular agenda for discussion.)
5. Boards and Commissions -- None
6. Public Hearings
6a. Public Hearing - Liquor License for Doubletree Park Place Hotel
Recommended Action: Mayor to close public hearing. Motion to Approve on-sale
intoxicating liquor license with Sunday sales to IVC WHH Minneapolis, LLC, dba
Doubletree Park Place Hotel located at 1500 Park Place Boulevard in St. Louis Park for
the license term of March 1, 2012 through March 1, 2013.
6b. Ordinance Adopting a Charter Amendment Pertaining to Civil Penalties
Recommended Action: Mayor to close public hearing. Motion to Adopt First
Reading of Ordinance amending the City Charter pertaining to Civil Penalties, and to
set the second reading for March 5, 2012.
6c. Public Hearing to Consider Allocation of 2012 Grant Year Community Development
Block Grant (CDBG) Funds
Recommended Action: Mayor to close the public hearing. Motion to Adopt
Resolution approving proposed use of 2012 Urban Hennepin County Community
Development Block Grant Program Funds and authorizing execution of Subrecipient
Agreement with Hennepin County and any Third Party Agreements.
7. Requests, Petitions, and Communications from the Public -- None
Meeting of February 21, 2012
City Council Agenda
8. Resolutions, Ordinances, Motions and Discussion Items
8a. Gateway Assisted Living Development
Recommended Action:
• Motion to Adopt Resolution approving the Preliminary and Final Planned Unit
Development for a three-story, 22-unit assisted living building.
• Motion to Adopt Resolution approving the Preliminary and Final Plat.
• Motion to Adopt Resolution approving a Zoning Variance to the rear yard setback
requirement.
8b. Resolution Approving 2012-2013 International Union of Operating Engineers (IUOE)
Local #49 Labor Agreement.
Recommended Action: Motion to Adopt Resolution approving a Labor Agreement
between the City and the Local #49 bargaining group, establishing terms and conditions
of employment for two years, from 1/1/12 – 12/31/13.
9. Communication
Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. To make arrangements, please call
the Administration Department at 952/924-2525 (TDD 952/924-2518) at least 96 hours in advance of meeting.
Meeting of February 21, 2012
City Council Agenda
CONSENT CALENDAR
4a. Adopt Resolution approving on-sale intoxicating and Sunday Liquor License Renewal for Park
Tavern Lounge & Lanes for the license term of March 1, 2012 through March 1, 2013; and
Resolution approving on-sale intoxicating and Sunday Liquor License Renewal for Toby Keith’s
I Love This Bar & Grill for the license term of March 1, 2012 through March 1, 2013 with the
condition that the licensee will be put on a probationary status for 6 months.
4b. Adopt Resolution approving a Wellness Incentive Program for benefit earning staff for
2012-2013.
4c. Adopt Resolution electing not to waive the statutory tort limits for liability insurance.
4d. Adopt Resolution which supports the Metropolitan Council’s Bonding Request for the
Southwest Light Rail Transit Project.
4e. Approve for Filing Fire Civil Service Commission Minutes June 8, 2011.
4f. Approve for Filing Housing Authority Minutes December 14, 2011.
4g. Approve for Filing Vendor Claims.
St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority and regular City Council meetings are carried live on Civic TV
cable channel 17 and replays are frequent; check www.parktv.org for the schedule. The meetings are also streamed
live on the internet at www.parktv.org, and saved for Video on Demand replays. The agenda is posted on Fridays
on the official city bulletin board in the lobby of City Hall and on the text display on Civic TV cable channel 17.
The agenda and full packet are available by noon on Friday on the city’s website.
Meeting Date: February 21, 2012
Agenda Item #: 3a
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
FEBRUARY 6, 2012
1. Call to Order
Mayor Jacobs called the meeting to order at 7:39 p.m.
Councilmembers present: Mayor Jeff Jacobs, Steve Hallfin, Anne Mavity, Julia Ross, Susan
Sanger, Sue Santa, and Jake Spano.
Councilmembers absent: None.
Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), Deputy City Manager/Director of Human
Resources (Ms. Deno), Communications Coordinator (Mr. Zwilling), and Recording Secretary
(Ms. Hughes).
1a. Pledge of Allegiance
1b. Roll Call
2. Presentations - None
3. Approval of Minutes
3a. Study Session Minutes January 9, 2012
The minutes were approved as presented.
3b. Special Study Session Minutes January 17, 2012
The minutes were approved as presented.
3c. City Council Meeting Minutes January 17, 2012
The minutes were approved as presented.
3d. City Council Workshop Minutes January 20 and 21, 2012
The minutes were approved as presented.
3e. Study Session Minutes January 23, 2012
Councilmember Mavity requested that a paragraph be added under paragraph 4 on page 3
that states “Councilmember Mavity asked if the City currently has a complete streets
policy and if not, asked that the City move toward adopting one. Mr. Harmening agreed
to report back to Council on the complete streets policy.”
The minutes were approved as amended.
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 3a) Page 2
Subject: Council Meeting Minutes of February 6, 2012
4. Approval of Agenda and Items on Consent Calendar
NOTE: The Consent Calendar lists those items of business which are considered to be routine
and/or which need no discussion. Consent items are acted upon by one motion. If discussion is
desired by either a Councilmember or a member of the audience, that item may be moved to an
appropriate section of the regular agenda for discussion.
4a. Approve Resolution No. 12-010 for 2012 Liquor License Renewals for the license
year term of March 1, 2012 through March 1, 2013.
4b. Adopt Resolution No. 12-011 authorizing the City of St. Louis Park to be a party to
Minnesota Water Agency Response Network (MnWARN).
4c. Adopt Resolution No. 12-012 authorizing the special assessment for the repair of
the water service line at 3232 Webster Avenue South, St. Louis Park, MN - P.I.D.
16-117-21-24-0043.
4d. Adopt the following Resolutions Imposing Civil Penalties for Liquor License
Violation according to the recommendation of the City Manager:
• Resolution No. 12-013 imposing civil penalty for liquor license violation
on November 23, 2011, at Texas-Tonka Liquors, 8242 Minnetonka Blvd.
• Resolution No 12-014 imposing civil penalty for liquor license violation
on November 23, 2011, at Jennings’ Liquor Store, 4631 Excelsior Blvd.
• Resolution No. 12-015 imposing civil penalty for liquor license violation
on December 9, 2011, at Little Szechuan, 5377 W. 16th St.
• Resolution No. 12-016 imposing civil penalty for liquor license violation
on December 9, 2011, at Crave, 1603 West End Blvd.
• Resolution No. 12-017 imposing civil penalty for liquor license violation
on December 9, 2011, at Liquor Barrel, 5111 Excelsior Blvd.
• Resolution No. 12-018 imposing civil penalty for liquor license violation
on December 12, 2011, at YUM!, 4000 Minnetonka Blvd.
• Resolution No. 12-019 imposing civil penalty for liquor license violation
on December 14, 2011, at Pei Wei Asian Diner, 5330 Cedar Lake Road,
Suite 600.
• Resolution No. 12-020 imposing civil penalty for liquor license violation
on January 7, 2012, at The Four Firkins, 5650 W. 36th Street.
4e. Adopt Resolution No. 12-021 to approve the West Metro Home Remodeling Fair’s
request for placing temporary signs in the public right-of-way.
4f. Adopt Resolution No. 12-022 authorizing execution of a one (1) year contract with
Summit Envirosolutions, Inc. for consultant services related to the implementation
of the Reilly Tar & Chemical Corporation (Reilly) Remedial Action Plan (RAP)
during year 2012.
4g. Approve extending the City’s contract with Prism (People Responding in Social
Ministry) to provide door-to-door dial-a-ride services to all residents of St. Louis
Park through December 31, 2012. Current contract expires February 29, 2012.
4h. Adopt Resolution No. 12-027 rescinding Resolution 94-36 and authorizing “No
Parking” restrictions at 4951 Cedar Lake Road.
4i. Adopt Resolution No. 12-023 accepting work and authorizing final payment in the
amount of $216,525.56 for the MSC Renovation Project 2008-1900.
4j. Approve for filing Human Rights Commission Minutes of November 15, 2011.
4k. Approve for filing Planning Commission Minutes of January 4, 2012.
4l. Approve for filing Planning commission Minutes of January 18, 2012.
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 3a) Page 3
Subject: Council Meeting Minutes of February 6, 2012
4m. Accept for filing Vendor Claims for the period December 10, 2011 through
December 30, 2011.
It was moved by Councilmember Sanger, seconded by Councilmember Santa, to approve
the Agenda and items listed on the Consent Calendar; and to waive reading of all
resolutions and ordinances.
The motion passed 7-0.
5. Boards and Commissions - None
6. Public Hearings - None
7. Requests, Petitions, and Communications from the Public – None
8. Resolutions, Ordinances, Motions and Discussion Items
8a. Resolution Approving 2012-2013 Law Enforcement Labor Services (LELS)
Local #218 Police Sergeants Labor Agreement
Resolution No. 12-024
Ms. Deno presented the staff report and introduced Eric Bakken, President of Firefighters
Local #993. She explained the City has five unions and all of the union contracts were
open for 2012. She added that the City enjoys a great relationship with all of its unions.
She presented the revisions to the 2012-2013 contracts for Local #218, Local #220, and
Local #993, and advised that wages will increase 2% in 2012 and 2013. Insurance will
be set consistent with other employee groups for 2012 and 2013 along with the wellness
benefit. She explained that two items were added to these contracts, including long term
disability starting in 2013. She noted the long term disability is a 60% wage replacement
and the cost is approximately $150 per employee per year. She indicated the City is also
offering employees an incentive through its deferred compensation program whereby the
City will contribute $10 per pay period with an employee contribution of at least $50 per
pay period. She indicated that the Local #218 Sergeants contract includes a
housekeeping item regarding probation for newly hired or promoted employees.
Councilmember Santa advised that her employer is ING and asked if her employment
would present a conflict of interest as it relates to the City’s contracts.
Ms. Deno replied that ING is a provider on the deferred compensation program.
Councilmember Santa stated she would abstain from voting on the contracts.
Councilmember Sanger commended Ms. Deno and the union representatives for
negotiating their contracts in good faith and reaching consensus.
Mayor Jacobs added that the contracts are a testament to the relationship the City has
with its employees and the value it places on its employees.
It was moved by Councilmember Sanger, seconded by Councilmember Mavity, to adopt
Resolution No. 12-024 Approving the Labor Agreement between the City of St. Louis Park
and Law Enforcement Labor Services, Local #218 Police Sergeants, January 1, 2012 –
December 31, 2013.
The motion passed 6-0-1 (Councilmember Santa abstained).
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 3a) Page 4
Subject: Council Meeting Minutes of February 6, 2012
8b. Resolution Approving 2012-2013 Law Enforcement Labor Services (LELS)
Local #220 Public Safety Dispatch Labor Agreement
Resolution No. 12-025
Ms. Deno presented the staff report and the 2012-2013 contract with Local #220 Public
Safety Dispatch.
It was moved by Councilmember Sanger, seconded by Councilmember Spano, to adopt
Resolution No. 12-025 Approving the Labor Agreement between the City of St. Louis
Park and Law Enforcement Labor Services, Local #220 Public Safety Dispatchers,
January 1, 2012 – December 31, 2013.
The motion passed 6-0-1 (Councilmember Santa abstained).
8c. Resolution Approving 2012-2013 International Association of Fire Fighters
(IAFF) Local #993 Labor Agreement
Resolution No. 12-026
Ms. Deno presented the staff report and the 2012-2013 contract with Fire Fighters Local
#993. She noted that because the fire fighters work 24 hour shifts, the contract contains
adjustments with respect to how time is transferred from shift to days with the leave
banks and a 1.4 conversion, how holiday and vacation time may be used and requested,
how comp time is accrued, and some other housekeeping items.
Mr. Bakken, President of Fire Fighters Local #993, stated that they had good discussions
with the City during the contract negotiations and thanked the City Council, City
Manager, City staff, and the negotiating teams for their efforts. He added that unions are
currently under attack in the State and across the country and he felt if people could see
how the City’s unions are able to work with City staff and negotiate their contracts, it
might alleviate some of the discourse being seen in other areas of the State.
It was moved by Councilmember Ross, seconded by Councilmember Mavity, to adopt
Resolution No. 12-026 Approving the Labor Agreement between the City of St. Louis
Park and International Association of Fire Fighters, Local #993, January 1, 2012 –
December 31, 2013.
The motion passed 6-0-1 (Councilmember Santa abstained).
9. Communications
Mayor Jacobs reminded residents that tomorrow, February 7th, is precinct caucus night in
Minnesota. He indicated the Secretary of State’s office has further information.
10. Adjournment
The meeting adjourned at 7:55 p.m.
______________________________________ ______________________________________
Nancy Stroth, City Clerk Jeff Jacobs, Mayor
Meeting Date: February 21, 2012
Agenda Item #: 4a
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
2012 Liquor License Renewals for Park Tavern and Toby Keith’s.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to Adopt Resolution approving on-sale intoxicating and Sunday Liquor License Renewal
for Park Tavern Lounge & Lanes for the license term of March 1, 2012 through March 1, 2013;
and Resolution approving on-sale intoxicating and Sunday Liquor License Renewal for Toby
Keith’s I Love This Bar & Grill for the license term of March 1, 2012 through March 1, 2013
with the condition that the licensee will be put on a probationary status for 6 months.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Does the City Council wish to approve renewal of the liquor licenses for Park Tavern and Toby
Keith’s I Love This Bar and with the conditions proposed by staff?
BACKGROUND:
On February 6, 2012 the liquor license renewal applications for licensees who met all required
criteria were approved by City Council. At the February 13 Study Session, Council discussed
the licensees who did not meet the ordinance requirement of at least 50% of the gross receipts
attributable to the sale of food. It was the consensus of council to proceed with liquor license
renewal consideration for Toby Keith I Love This Bar and Park Tavern Lounge & Lanes with the
condition that a probationary status for 6 months would start on March 1, 2012.
At the February 13 Study Session Phil Weber from Park Tavern Lounge & Lanes stated there
was a mix-up in the bowling and food numbers, which resulted in food sales being incorrectly
reported. It was the consensus of the City Council that if corrected data was submitted by Park
Tavern showing they have met the City’s 50% requirement for food sales, their license would be
approved with no probationary status. Staff received the report of the corrected 2011 food and
liquor percentages as follows:
Licensee Food % Liquor %
Park Tavern Lounge & Lanes 51.1% 48.9%
Staff is proposing renewal of Park Tavern’s liquor license without probation, as stated in the
attached resolution; and the renewal of the liquor license for Toby Keith’s I love This Bar with
the following conditions as stated in the attached resolution:
1. The licensee will be put on a probationary status for 6 months.
2. The license shall provide a second report of food and liquor sales for the period of March
1, 2012 through August 31, 2012 by September 15, 2012.
3. The licensee will continue working with city staff to meet liquor license compliance
requirements.
4. Staff will report probationary results to Council in October 2012, and if it is determined
non-compliance still exists, council may take further action during this license period up
to and including revocation of the license.
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 4a) Page 2
Subject: 2012 Liquor License Renewals - Park Tavern & Toby Keith’s
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
Fees are set based on state statute and are only charged to the extent necessary to cover costs
incurred by the city for services provided.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
Attachments: Resolutions
Prepared by: Nancy Stroth, City Clerk
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 4a) Page 3
Subject: 2012 Liquor License Renewals - Park Tavern & Toby Keith’s
RESOLUTION NO. 12 - _____
RESOLUTION APPROVING ISSUANCE OF
LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWAL WITH CONDITIONS
FOR PHILIPS INVESTMENT CO.
DBA PARK TAVERN LOUNGE & LANES,
3401 LOUISIANA AVENUE SOUTH
FOR MARCH 1, 2012 THROUGH MARCH 1, 2013
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 340A and St. Louis Park Ordinance Code
Chapter 3 provide for liquor licensing in cooperation with the Alcohol and Gambling
Enforcement Division of the Minnesota Department of Public Safety, and
WHEREAS, no license may be issued or renewed if required criteria has not been met,
and
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City of St. Louis Park City Council
that the issuance of the on-sale intoxicating and Sunday liquor license for Philips Investment Co.,
dba Park Tavern Lounge & Lanes has met the criteria necessary for issuance of their liquor
licenses, and the application is hereby approved for March 1, 2012 to March 1, 2013.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council February 21, 2012
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 4a) Page 4
Subject: 2012 Liquor License Renewals - Park Tavern & Toby Keith’s
RESOLUTION NO. 12 - ____
RESOLUTION APPROVING ISSUANCE OF
LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWAL WITH CONDITIONS
FOR CRGE MINNEAPOLIS, LLC
DBA TOBY KEITH’S I LOVE THIS BAR,
1623 PARK PLACE BOULEVARD
FOR MARCH 1, 2012 THROUGH MARCH 1, 2013
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 340A and St. Louis Park Ordinance Code
Chapter 3 provide for liquor licensing in cooperation with the Alcohol and Gambling
Enforcement Division of the Minnesota Department of Public Safety, and
WHEREAS, no license may be issued or renewed if required criteria has not been met,
and
WHEREAS, City Ordinance Section 3-70 (g) allows the city to place the license of any
on-sale intoxicating liquor licensee on probationary status for up to one year, when the sale of
food is reported, or found to be, less than 50 percent of gross receipts for any business year, and
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City of St. Louis Park City Council
that the issuance of the on-sale intoxicating and Sunday liquor license for CRGE Minneapolis,
LLC, dba Toby Keith’s I Love This Bar is hereby approved for March 1, 2012 to March 1, 2013
with the following conditions:
1. The licensee will be put on a probationary status for 6 months.
2. The license shall provide a second report of food and liquor sales for the period of
March 1, 2012 through August 31, 2012 by September 15, 2012.
3. The licensee will continue working with city staff to meet liquor license compliance
requirements.
4. Staff will report probationary results to Council in October 2012 and if in non-
compliance, council may take further action during this license period up to and
including revocation of the license.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council February 21, 2012
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Meeting Date: February 21, 2012
Agenda Item #: 4b
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Resolution Approving 2012-2013 Wellness Incentive Program.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to Adopt Resolution approving a Wellness Incentive Program for benefit earning staff
for 2012-2013.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Does Council wish to approve the proposed Wellness Incentive Program for 2012-2013?
(Note – staff provided a report on this same proposal in the City Councils study session agenda
packet of 2/13/12.)
BACKGROUND:
Why provide a wellness incentive? As health care costs continue to rise year after year, we have
searched for ways to keep our premiums low. Methods such as switching health care providers,
offering consumer driven health plans, creating VEBA/HRA accounts, and reducing plan options
have been implemented. At a certain point, the only remaining way to lower costs is to have
healthier employees. We can attempt to make employees healthier by focusing on prevention
and targeting specific behavior changes.
In 2011, the City Council approved the first Wellness Incentive Program, which provided
employees an additional $25 per month in Employer Contribution in 2012 for completing
required wellness activities in 2011. The wellness activities needed to be accomplished in order
to be eligible for the incentive included a health risk assessment questionnaire, must be tobacco-
free (or participating in a cessation program), biometric screen, flu shot, and preventive
medical/dental exams.
How many people participated? We exceeded expectations and had 177 employees (of 245
eligible, or 72%) qualify in 2011 and are receiving the incentive in 2012.
How can we keep the momentum going? This program is in the beginning stages of an ongoing
and evolving strategic wellness program. Our long term goal is to continue and improve upon
the program to achieve results that align employee behaviors to desired healthy outcomes.
The first year’s requirements were participation based only. It is recommended that for the
second year, additional criteria are added in which behavior change is targeted. Our health
insurer, HealthPartners, has programs available (either three telephonic coaching sessions or an
eight week online program) focused on behavior change in the areas of physical activity,
nutrition, tobacco cessation, weight management, stress management, chemical health, emotional
health, back health, cholesterol, blood pressure management, and others.
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 4b) Page 2
Subject: Resolution Approving 2012-2013 Wellness Incentive Program
In order to receive the 2013 wellness incentive, employees will be required to complete the
participation-based requirements (same as previous year), plus one behavior change program
(either telephonic or online) as described above.
What is the recommended 2013 incentive amount? Because the required criteria for achieving
the incentive have increased, it is recommended that the incentive be increased as well. The
incentive for 2012 was $25/month for participation activities.
It is recommended that the City of St. Louis Park provide $35 per month in 2013 as additional
Employer Contribution to employees who successfully meet the requirements of the Wellness
Incentive Program in 2012. This is an increase of $10 to the 2012 amount. The 2013 Employer
Contribution amount has not yet been determined, but a recommendation of this amount will be
provided to Council (based on premium increases and budget) in fall 2012.
Other info? Future incentives, if any, will be recommended to Council after review of the
previous year. It is recommended that the full Wellness Incentive amount be provided to ALL
benefit earning employees (i.e., not pro-rated for part-time employees) who successfully meet
program requirements.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
If approved, the Wellness Incentive amount will be reflected in the 2013 budget.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Offering a competitive benefits package helps in the recruitment and retention of connected,
engaged, and diverse staff.
Attachment: Resolution
Prepared by: Ali Fosse, HR Coordinator
Reviewed by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 4b) Page 3
Subject: Resolution Approving 2012-2013 Wellness Incentive Program
RESOLUTION NO. 12-____
RESOLUTION APPROVING
2012-2013 WELLNESS INCENTIVE PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the City Council has established a benefit plan that provides an effective means
for providing employee group benefits; and
WHEREAS, the City Council establishes contribution amounts for each calendar year; and
WHEREAS, the administration of such plans will be in accordance with plan documents as
approved by the City Manager, who will also set policy and procedures for benefit level
classification and administration of plans; and
WHEREAS, organizations with healthy staff often report higher morale and productivity,
and lower absenteeism and health costs; and
WHEREAS, the City wishes to encourage and incent staff to participate in activities
designed to improve the health and wellness of our staff to reap more of the aforementioned
benefits;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park
that a Wellness Incentive Program is approved as follows:
• Benefit-eligible employees who successfully complete the components of the program as
determined by the City Manager in 2012 are eligible for the incentive in 2013, and
• The amount of the incentive is set at $35 per month as additional Employer Contribution
in 2013. This amount is not pro-rated for part-time employees (will be provided in full),
and
• The City Manager has the authority to set final program criteria, determine if criteria has
been met, and has complete authority in awarding the incentive to staff.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council February 21, 2012
City Manager
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Meeting Date: February 21, 2012
Agenda Item #: 4c
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Statutory Tort Limits for Liability Insurance.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to Adopt Resolution electing not to waive the statutory tort limits for liability insurance.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Does the Council agree with Staff’s recommendation to continue the past decision not to waive
the statutory tort limits for liability insurance?
BACKGROUND:
Each year the Council is required to pass a resolution indicating if they wish to waive or not
waive the monetary limits on municipal tort liability insurance established by Minnesota Statute
466.04.
The statutory liability limits for claims that occur after July 1, 2009 are $500,000 per claimant
and $1,500,000 per occurrence.
The City Council must review and make an election of one of the following three options:
• Not to waive the statutory tort limits
• Waive the limits and not purchase excess liability coverage.
• Waive the limits and purchase excess liability coverage
Option 1 (Current)
If the city elects not to waive the statutory tort limits, an individual claimant would be able to
recover no more than $500,000 on any claim to which the statutory tort limits apply. The total
which all claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort
limits apply would be limited to $1,500,000. These statutory tort limits would apply regardless
of whether or not the city purchases the optional excess liability coverage.
Option 2
If the city waives the statutory tort limits and does not purchase excess liability coverage, a
single claimant could potentially recover up to $1,500,000 on a single occurrence. The total
which all claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort
limits apply would also be limited to $1,500,000, regardless of the number of claimants.
Option 3
If the city waives the statutory tort limits and purchases excess liability coverage, a single
claimant could potentially recover an amount up to the limit of the coverage purchased. The
total which all claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory
tort limits apply would also be limited to the amount of coverage purchased, regardless of the
number of claimants.
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 4c) Page 2
Subject: Statutory Tort Limits for Liability Insurance
The City of St. Louis Park in the past has elected to not waive the statutory tort limits and has not
purchased excess liability coverage. Staff recommends continuing this practice and not to waive
the statutory limits. The following resolution allows the statutory tort limits to remain in place
until the Council changes this election. Staff will ask Council to consider this question annually
as required by the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
The City will continue to maintain liability insurance coverage through the League of Minnesota
Cities Insurance Trust in the amount required by State Statute, and the required annual motion
will be in place in preparation for the new policy year.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
Attachment: Resolution
Prepared by: Darla Monson, Senior Accountant
Reviewed by: Brian Swanson, Controller
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 4c) Page 3
Subject: Statutory Tort Limits for Liability Insurance
RESOLUTION NO. 12-____
RESOLUTION ELECTING NOT TO WAIVE THE
STATUTORY TORT LIMITS
FOR LIABILITY INSURANCE
WHEREAS, pursuant to previous action taken, the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance
Trust has requested the City to make an election with regard to waiving or not waiving its tort
liability established by Minnesota Statutes 466.04; and
WHEREAS, the choices available are to not waive the statutory limit, to waive the limit but
to keep insurance coverage at the statutory limit, or to waive the limit and to add additional
insurance coverage;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the St. Louis Park City Council does
hereby elect not to waive the statutory tort liability limit established by Minnesota Statutes
466.04 and that such election is effective until amended by further resolution of the St. Louis
Park City Council.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council February 21, 2012
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Meeting Date: February 21, 2012
Agenda Item #: 4d
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Resolution Supporting Metropolitan Council’s 2012 Bonding Request for the Southwest Light
Rail Transit Project.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to Adopt Resolution which supports the Metropolitan Council’s Bonding Request for the
Southwest Light Rail Transit Project.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Does the City Council wish to provide official support for the Metropolitans Councils request of
the Minnesota State Legislature to provide $25 million in funding for the Southwest Light Rail
Transit project as identified in Governor Dayton’s 2012 bonding bill?
BACKGROUND:
In the past the City Council has taken action indicating its support of the SWLRT project.
In order to keep the SWLRT project on schedule, the Metropolitan Council has requested the
State Legislature provide $25 million in funding as part of the 2012 bonding bill. Governor
Dayton supports this request and has included this amount in the bonding bill proposal he has
submitted to the State Legislature.
In order to assist with having this request approved by the State Legislature, the City Council is
asked to adopt the attached resolution expressing its support for this funding request. Other cities
along the SWLRT corridor are also taking similar action.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
This action does not have a direct financial impact on the City.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
This action supports Vision St. Louis Park and the Council's adopted Strategic Directions.
Attachment: Resolution
Prepared & Reviewed by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 4d) Page 2
Subject: Resolution Supporting Met Council’s 2012 Bonding Request for SWLRT Project
RESOLUTION NO. 12-____
A RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF THE
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL’S 2012 BONDING REQUEST FOR
SOUTHWEST LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT
WHEREAS, the proposed Southwest Light Rail Transit line from Eden Prairie to
Minneapolis will run through the City of St. Louis Park, with three station locations at Beltline
Blvd, Wooddale Ave and Louisiana Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the Southwest Light Rail Transit line is a key element in our City's future
as it will connect businesses and workers, support economic growth, improve transit options for
residents, and provide housing choices; and
WHEREAS, the Southwest Light Rail Transit line will contribute to the economic
vitality of our City and region and support the overall economic competitiveness of the State of
Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, the City Council is supportive of the Southwest Light Rail Transit project;
and
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council has requested that $25 million be provided in the
2012 bonding bill for the Southwest Light Rail Transit project and the Governor of the State of
Minnesota supports this request; and
WHEREAS, approving this funding request is crucial to keeping the Southwest Light
Rail Transit project on schedule as it moves through Preliminary Engineering and seeks final
federal approval;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council for the City of St.
Louis Park supports the bonding bill request made by the Metropolitan Council and supported by
the Governor and urges all Hennepin County state legislators to support the bonding request for
Southwest Light Rail Transit and to work to make sure that the State of Minnesota continues to
provide resources for this crucial regional transportation project.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council February 21, 2012
City Manager
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Meeting Date: February 21, 2012
Agenda Item #: 4e
FIRE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION MINUTES
June 8, 2011 – 8:00 a.m.
CHIEF STEMMER’S OFFICE, 1ST FLOOR CITY HALL
1) The meeting was called to order at 8:10 a.m. by Secretary Douville.
2) In attendance were Commissioners David Lee and Marjorie Douville (via teleconference).
Also present were Ali Fosse, Human Resources Coordinator/Staff Liaison; Luke
Stemmer, Fire Chief; Eric Bakken, President Local 993; and Mike Dobesh, Assistant
Chief.
3) A motion was made by Commissioner Douville, seconded by Commissioner Lee, to
approve the minutes from the February 7, 2011 meeting. Motion carried unanimously.
4) Ali presented the Firefighter eligibility register. Sixteen candidates made the list.
Commissioner Lee noted that the process changes that were implemented this year were
beneficial and resulted in high quality candidates on the eligibility register. A motion was
made by Commissioner Douville, seconded by Commissioner Lee, to approve the
Firefighter eligibility register. Motion carried unanimously.
5) A motion was made by Commissioner Douville, seconded by Commissioner Lee, to
certify the top three names on the Firefighter eligibility register: Jens Anderson, Tim
Nordstrom, and James Chandler. Motion carried unanimously.
6) Ali presented the Fire Captain eligibility register. All six candidates who applied
successfully passed the process and made the list. A motion was made by Commissioner
Lee, seconded by Commissioner Douville, to approve the Fire Captain eligibility register.
Motion carried unanimously.
7) A motion was made by Commissioner Douville, seconded by Commissioner Lee, to
certify the top three names on the Fire Captain eligibility register: Steve Powers, Rodger
Coppa, and Eric Curran-Bakken. Motion carried unanimously.
8) The Commission adjourned at 8:15 a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Ali Fosse
City Staff Liaison to the Fire Civil Service Commission
Meeting Date: February 21, 2012
Agenda Item #: 4f
MINUTES
St. Louis Park Housing Authority
Westwood Room, St. Louis Park City Hall
St. Louis Park, MN
Wednesday, December 14, 2011
5:00 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioners Catherine Courtney, Renee DuFour
Commissioner Metzger arrived at 5:08 p.m.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Commissioners Trinicia Hill, Justin Kaufman
STAFF PRESENT: Jane Klesk, Kathy Larsen, Kevin Locke, Teresa Schlegel,
Michele Schnitker
1. Call to Order
The meeting was called to order at 5:04 p.m.
2. Approval of Minutes for November, 2011
The Board minutes of November 9, 2011 were unanimously approved.
3. Hearings – None
4. Reports and Committees – None
5. Unfinished Business – None
6. New Business
a. Greensboro Condominium Association Housing Improvement Area (HIA)
Ms. Larsen stated that the City Council has adopted an ordinance to establish the
Greensboro Condominium HIA, and will lend the association approximately
$3,835,000 to make improvements on the property. Owners will repay the loan
through a fee imposed on their real estate tax payments.
b. Amendment to Private Development Contract with Martin Stillman and Amy
Susman-Stillman for Development of 2715 Monterey Ave. So., Vacant Land Parcel
Ms. Larsen reviewed the amendment to the contract with the Stillmans for
development of 2715 Monterey Ave. So., explaining that staff believes the developer
has acted in a reasonable manner and that any delays have been based on the volatility
of the economy and housing market. Commissioner DuFour moved to approve the
Fourth Amendment to Contract for Private Development (2715 Monterey Avenue
South) By and Between the Housing Authority of St. Louis Park and Martin Stillman
and Amy Susman-Stillman, Dated December 19, 2007, extending Section 4.2
Schedule of Construction completion date to December 31, 2012. Commissioner
Metzger seconded the motion, and the motion passed 3-0.
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 4f) Page 2
Subject: Housing Authority Meeting Minutes of December 14, 2011
c. Review of Proposed Use and Approval of the Acceptance of the Minnesota Housing
Finance Agency, Publicly Owned Housing Program Loan, Resolution No. 609
Ms. Schlegel reviewed the terms of the HA’s February 2010 award of $218,000 in
Publicly Owned Housing Program Funds (PHOP) from the Minnesota Housing
Agency. Commissioner DuFour moved to approve Resolution No. 609, Resolution of
the Housing Authority of St. Louis Park, Minnesota Authorizing Acceptance of
Publicly Owned Housing Program Funds From the Minnesota Housing Agency, and
compliance with all requirements. Commissioner Metzger seconded the motion, and
the motion passed 3-0.
d. Approval of 2012 Public Housing Insurance Award
Ms. Schlegel explained that three insurance proposals were received in response to
the Authority’s request for 2012 proposals. HA staff recommends accepting the State
Farm Insurance proposal (the HA’s current insurance provider), which came in at the
lowest rate totaling $32,012.30. Commissioner DuFour moved to (1) accept the
proposal of State Farm at the rate of $28.497.80 for property, liability, and crime
(with a $5,000 deductible per incident); $1,810.50 for automobile; and $1,704 for
umbrella liability, and (2) authorize staff to renew the flood policy when due at the
anticipated premium cost of approximately $2,924. Commissioner Metzger seconded
the motion; the motion passed 3-0.
e. First Amendment to Contract for Financial Services By and Between the Housing
Authority of St. Louis Park and City of St. Louis Park
Ms. Schnitker stated that a contract extension to February 29, 2012 is proposed to
allow additional time for staff to review whether revisions are required to either the
scope of work or the current fee structure. Commissioner DuFour moved to approve
the First Amendment to Contract for Financial Services By and Between the Housing
Authority of St. Louis Park and City of St. Louis Park. Commissioner Metzger
seconded the motion and the motion passed 3-0.
7. Communications from Executive Director
a. Claims List – December, 2011
b. Communications
1. Monthly Report – December, 2011
2. Draft Financial Statements – November, 2011
8. Other
9. Adjournment
Commissioner Metzger moved to adjourn the meeting, and Commissioner DuFour seconded
the motion. The motion passed 3-0. The meeting adjourned at 5:49 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
_________________________
Renee DuFour, Secretary
Meeting Date: February 21, 2012
Agenda Item #: 4g
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Vendor Claims.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to accept for filing Vendor Claims for the period January 28, 2012 through February 10,
2012.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
BACKGROUND:
The Finance Department prepares this report on a monthly basis for Council’s review.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
None.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
Attachments: Vendor Claims
Prepared by: Connie Neubeck, Account Clerk
2/16/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:28:55R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
1Page -Council Check Summary
2/10/2012 -1/28/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
569.45FABRICATIONOTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES3M
569.45
1,446.39PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYAAA-LICENSE DIVISION
1,446.39
7,307.20GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESABM JANITORIAL SERVICES
7,307.20
21,161.84REILLY BUDGET GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESAECOM INC
21,161.84
1,777.50H.V.A.C. EQUIP. MTCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICEALLIANCE MECH SRVCS INC
1,777.50
78.88POLICE G & A TELEPHONEAMERICAN MESSAGING
78.88
55.58GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE OPERATIONAL SUPPLIESAMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SER
137.56PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
87.12PARK MAINTENANCE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
77.98ENTERPRISE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
97.90VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
56.42WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
56.40SEWER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
10.26STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
579.22
1,602.26INSTALLATIONOTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESANDERSEN INC, EARL
1,342.97FABRICATIONOTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
2,945.23
638.31GENERAL CUSTODIAL DUTIES CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SUPPLYARAMARK UNIFORM CORP ACCTS
211.72ENTERPRISE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
850.03
2,000.00ESCROWSDEMO / BROOKSIDE TRAFFICARNASON, DAVID & PAMELA
2,000.00
54.31PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYASPEN EQUIPMENT CO
183.23GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES
237.54
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 4g)
Subject: Vendor Claims 2
2/16/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:28:55R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
2Page -Council Check Summary
2/10/2012 -1/28/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
63.83CLEANING/DEBRIS REMOVAL CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICEATOMIC RECYCLING
63.83VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE
63.84SEWER UTILITY G&A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE
191.50
814.68STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICEBARR ENGINEERING CO
814.68
126.46WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERSBARR, M
126.46
700.00POLICE G & A TRAININGBCA CJTE
700.00
556.00DARE PROGRAM OPERATIONAL SUPPLIESBEEKS PIZZA
556.00
122.86INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESBOBIER, HEIDI
122.86
30.55INSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESBOETTCHER, ANN
30.55
694.19POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIESBOUND TREE MEDICAL, LLC
694.19
989.25GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURESBRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION
989.25
300.27ROUTINE MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESBRO TEX INC
300.27WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
400.35SEWER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
1,000.89
2.81-GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTSBROWNELLS, INC
43.75RANGEPOLICE EQUIPMENT
40.94
81.75POLICE G & A POLICE EQUIPMENTCARDIAC SCIENCE INC
1,550.00DONATIONSPOLICE EQUIPMENT
1,631.75
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 4g)
Subject: Vendor Claims 3
2/16/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:28:55R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
3Page -Council Check Summary
2/10/2012 -1/28/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
82.87WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERSCARPENTER, KEN
82.87
516.20IT G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICECARTRIDGE CARE
516.20
257.25EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESCBIZ FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS INC
257.25
17.66SEWER UTILITY G&A HEATING GASCENTERPOINT ENERGY
17.66
9,880.08EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S OTHER RETIREMENTCENTRAL PENSION FUND
9,880.08
85.83PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYCENTRAL POWER DISTRIBUTORS INC
85.83
94.61-GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTSCITIZENS INDEPENDENT BANK
1,470.78ADMINISTRATION G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
344.94ADMINISTRATION G & A MEETING EXPENSE
8.00ADMINISTRATION G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR
441.91HUMAN RESOURCES ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
12.00RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES
349.51ASSESSING G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
1,047.51ASSESSING G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
ASSESSING G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
79.00ASSESSING G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
197.44INSPECTIONS G & A TRAINING
600.00ENGINEERING G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
4,456.48
910.72CONCESSIONS/HOCKEY ASSOC CONCESSION SUPPLIESCOCA-COLA BOTTLING CO
910.72
194.85INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESCOLBORN, CHRISTINE
194.85
15,916.14ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL SERVICESCOLICH & ASSOCIATES
15,916.14
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 4g)
Subject: Vendor Claims 4
2/16/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:28:55R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
4Page -Council Check Summary
2/10/2012 -1/28/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
4.51BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICECOMCAST
4.51
650.00TRAININGTRAININGCOMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION
650.00
559.91BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESCONTINENTAL RESEARCH CORP
559.91
2.11-GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTSCOOKE JP CO
32.76ASSESSING G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
30.65
55.69SUPPORT SERVICES G&A OFFICE SUPPLIESCROWN MARKING INC
55.69
158.80POLICE G & A SUBSISTENCE SUPPLIESCUB FOODS
158.80
28,065.29MUNICIPAL BLDG BUILDING MTCE SERVICECUMMINS NPOWER LLC
28,065.29
779.67GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SUPPLYDALCO ENTERPRISES INC
779.67
325.00BASKETBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESDEAN, ARTHUR
325.00
500.00POLICE G & A TRAININGDEFENSIVE EDGE TRAINING & CONS
500.00
4,921.47INSPECTIONS G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTSDEPT LABOR & INDUSTRY
4,921.47
96.67WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERSDICKMAN, JANICE
96.67
209.48PATCHING-PERMANENT EQUIPMENT PARTSDISCOUNT STEEL INC
209.48
315.00ARENA MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEDJ ELECTRIC SERVICES INC
315.00
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 4g)
Subject: Vendor Claims 5
2/16/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:28:55R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
5Page -Council Check Summary
2/10/2012 -1/28/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
8,706.95GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURESDLR GROUP KKE
8,706.95
52.99WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERSEDINA REALTY TITLE
52.99
297,320.02CONSTRUCTION PAYMENTS IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDIEDINA, CITY OF
6,963.00WATER UTILITY G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
7,451.00SEWER UTILITY G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
79,434.00STORM WATER UTILITY G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
15,732.00TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
406,900.02
223.75SYSTEM REPAIR OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESEGAN COMPANIES INC
12,459.82GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES
12,683.57
1,428.60GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEEMERGENCY APPARATUS MTNCE
1,428.60
375.37PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYEMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOG
375.37
450.00ADMINISTRATION G & A TRAININGEMPLOYEE STRATEGIES INC
1,500.00HUMAN RESOURCES ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
1,950.00
101.75INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESENROOTH, ELIN
101.75
1,168.43SANDING/SALTING OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESENVIROTECH SERVICES INC
1,168.43
5,372.00NETWORK SUPPORT SERVICES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESESP SYSTEMS PROFESSIONALS INC
5,372.00
466.54PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYFACTORY MOTOR PARTS CO
17.86GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES
484.40
112.21INSTALLATIONOTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESFASTENAL COMPANY
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 4g)
Subject: Vendor Claims 6
2/16/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:28:55R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
6Page -Council Check Summary
2/10/2012 -1/28/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
9.51PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
121.72
136.27POLICE G & A POSTAGEFEDEX
136.27
411.58WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERSFIELDS, LEE
411.58
20.58WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERSFIRST PRESTON MANAGEMENT INC
20.58
2,200.00POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESFISCHLER & ASSOCIATES PA
2,200.00
205.55WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERSFITZKE, SUSAN
205.55
40.00POLICE G & A BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIESFLOYD TOTAL SECURITY
40.00
175.78PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYFORCE AMERICA INC
175.78
4,308.02EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S LONG TERM CARE INSURGLTC PREMIUM PAYMENTS
4,308.02
197.40WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICEGOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC
197.40
204.53-GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIESGRAINGER INC, WW
40.21INSTALLATIONOTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
221.36BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
59.71WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT PARTS
182.58WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER
299.33
40.20-GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTSGRAPHIK DIMENSIONS LTD
624.95GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES
584.75
1,037.50BROOMBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESHAMILTON, MIKE
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 4g)
Subject: Vendor Claims 7
2/16/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:28:55R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
7Page -Council Check Summary
2/10/2012 -1/28/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
1,037.50
5,337.40WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIESHAWKINS INC
5,337.40
16.00SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICEHD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD
16.00
925.00BASKETBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESHEALEY, MICHAEL
925.00
5,825.00OPERATIONSTRAININGHENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER
5,825.00
44.00ASSESSING G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESHENNEPIN COUNTY TAXPAYER SERVI
44.00
981.00POLICE G & A SUBSISTENCE SERVICEHENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
2,700.00PARK IMPROVEMENT G & A PAYMENT IN LIEU OF TAXES
3,681.00
1.90ROUTINE MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESHOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
42.59GRAFFITI CONTROL OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
34.12SANDING/SALTING EQUIPMENT PARTS
566.12RELAMPINGOTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
64.09INSTALLATIONSMALL TOOLS
18.77FABRICATIONOTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
233.03TREE MAINTENANCE LANDSCAPING MATERIALS
960.62
348.37PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A ELECTRIC SERVICEHOPKINS, CITY OF
348.37
65.49ASSESSING G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CARHOPPE, MARK
65.49
388.44GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIESHOTSY EQUIPMENT OF MN
388.44
8.54PATCHING-PERMANENT SMALL TOOLSHSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS
498.33PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
51.24WESTWOOD G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 4g)
Subject: Vendor Claims 8
2/16/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:28:55R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
8Page -Council Check Summary
2/10/2012 -1/28/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
558.11
1,590.00GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET UNREALIZED REVENUEHURWITZ LAW FIRM
1,590.00
236.63PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYI-STATE TRUCK CENTER
2,040.15GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
2,276.78
120.00POLICE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSIACP
120.00
681.73WATER UTILITY G&A POSTAGEIMPACT PROVEN SOLUTIONS
681.73SEWER UTILITY G&A POSTAGE
681.73SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS POSTAGE
409.94STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
681.73STORM WATER UTILITY G&A POSTAGE
3,136.86
20.41SANDING/SALTING EQUIPMENT PARTSINDELCO
20.41
10.15WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERSINNOVATIVE RESOURCE GROUP
10.15
656.88PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYINVER GROVE FORD
949.55GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
1,606.43
16.34GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIESJERRY'S HARDWARE
16.34
2,598.01WATER UTILITY G&A OTHERJOHN HENRY FOSTER MN
9,277.18WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
11,875.19
24,693.00MUNICIPAL BLDG BUILDINGS & STRUCTURESJORGENSON CONSTRUCTION INC
24,693.00
136.00INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESKARCHER-RAMOS, AMBER
136.00
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 4g)
Subject: Vendor Claims 9
2/16/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:28:55R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
9Page -Council Check Summary
2/10/2012 -1/28/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
276.92EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S WAGE GARNISHMENTSKELLER, JASMINE Z
276.92
1,363.00ESCROWSANDERSON BUILDERSKENNEDY & GRAVEN
2,574.00ESCROWS
3,937.00
1,716.50-WATER UTILITY BALANCE SHEET RETAINED PERCENTAGEKEYS WELL DRILLING CO
34,330.00CONSTRUCTION PAYMENTS IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
32,613.50
1,100.00PRE-SCHOOL PROGRAMS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESKIDCREATE STUDIO
1,100.00
363.17PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYKOVATCH MOBILE EQUIPMENT CORP
23.36-PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH DUE TO OTHER GOVTS
339.81
56.00INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESKURDYUMOVA, YELENA
56.00
100.00VOLLEYBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESLANG, LISA
120.00HOCKEYOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
220.00
402.92WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICELARSCO INC
402.92
119.64PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYLARSON COMPANIES
119.64
956.34-GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESLARSON, JH CO
981.94SYSTEM REPAIR OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
195.19BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
220.79
165.94GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIESLAWSON PRODUCTS INC
165.94
119,654.75EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A League of MN Cities dept'l expLEAGUE OF MN CITIES INSURANCE
35,374.34UNINSURED LOSS G&A UNINSURED LOSS
155,029.09
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 4g)
Subject: Vendor Claims 10
2/16/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:28:55R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
10Page -Council Check Summary
2/10/2012 -1/28/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
151.12INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESLENTNER, LAURA
151.12
10,763.90MUNICIPAL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDILIGHTING HOUSE USA INC
10,763.90
480.00IT G & A COMPUTER SERVICESLOGIS
2.00NETWORK SUPPORT SERVICES COMPUTER SERVICES
482.00
181.46ADMINISTRATION G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTATM&T'S MUNCHIES
181.46
1,760.61FABRICATIONOTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESM-R SIGN CO INC
1,760.61
2,928.05UNINSURED LOSS G&A UNINSURED LOSSMAACO AUTO PAINTING
2,928.05
197.65INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESMACGREGOR-HANNAH, MAREN
197.65
274.15PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYMACQUEEN EQUIP CO
283.13SEWER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT PARTS
557.28
45.00ADMINISTRATION G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSMAMA
45.00
450.00BROOMBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESMARGO, MICHELLE
450.00
27.44WESTWOOD G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CARMCCONNELL, BECKY
27.44
191.98TV PRODUCTION NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENTMCHUGH, JOHN T
191.98
142.08PUBLIC WORKS G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CARMERKLEY, SCOTT
142.08
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 4g)
Subject: Vendor Claims 11
2/16/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:28:55R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
11Page -Council Check Summary
2/10/2012 -1/28/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
2,422.37SEWER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERSMETHODIST HOSPITAL
2,422.37
400.00OPERATIONSSUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSMETRO CHIEF FIRE OFFICERS ASSN
400.00
440.00VOLLEYBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESMETRO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS
440.00
21,690.55PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYMIDWAY FORD
21,690.55
475.00WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESMIDWEST TESTING LLC
475.00
151.62EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S ACCRUED OTHER BENEFITSMINNESOTA BENEFIT ASSOC
151.62
50.00OPERATIONSSUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSMINNESOTA CHAPTER IAAI
50.00
16.00EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S ACCRUED OTHER BENEFITSMINNESOTA NCPERS LIFE INS
16.00
150.00WATER UTILITY G&A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTATMINNESOTA RURAL WATER ASSOC
150.00
20.00ORGANIZED REC G & A TRAININGMINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY
20.00
1,816.55SUPPORT SERVICES G&A OFFICE SUPPLIESMINUTEMAN PRESS
1,816.55
135.73WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT PARTSMINVALCO INC
135.73
500.00HUMAN RESOURCES ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENTMNMAC LLC
500.00
250.00REILLY BUDGET OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESMVTL LABORATORIES
250.00
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 4g)
Subject: Vendor Claims 12
2/16/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:28:55R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
12Page -Council Check Summary
2/10/2012 -1/28/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
1,152.06PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYNAPA (GENUINE PARTS CO)
25.42PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
508.38VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES
365.50GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES
2,051.36
53.28ASSESSING G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CARNATHANSON, BRIDGET
53.28
560.00EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A TUITIONNELSON, BRENDA
560.00
58.03VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIESNEP CORP
58.03
150.00ERUSUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSNTOA
150.00
500.00WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERSNUSSBAUM, LESLIE
500.00
1,884.25ORGANIZED REC G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESO'SULLIVAN, ELLEN
1,884.25
500.00POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESOAK KNOLL ANIMAL HOSPITAL
500.00
54.41INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESOBERSTAR, KATIE
54.41
253.97FINANCE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIESOFFICE DEPOT
49.00GENERAL INFORMATION OFFICE SUPPLIES
195.58POLICE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
13.87OPERATIONSOFFICE SUPPLIES
716.86INSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
47.46PUBLIC WORKS G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
117.28ORGANIZED REC G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
3.06HOUSING REHAB G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
1,397.08
120.00ADMINISTRATION G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSOFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STA
120.00
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 4g)
Subject: Vendor Claims 13
2/16/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:28:55R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
13Page -Council Check Summary
2/10/2012 -1/28/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
34.24BASKETBALLGENERAL SUPPLIESOLSEN CHAIN & CABLE CO INC
34.24
166.75EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESOPTUM HEALTH FINANCIAL SERVICE
166.75
169.57INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESPARR, MELISSA
169.57
45.80SCHOOL LIASON TRAININGPEEK, TROY
45.80
225.00BASKETBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESPETERSEN, CHRISTA
225.00
4.89POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIESPETTY CASH
20.00POLICE G & A LICENSES
21.50DWI ENFORCEMENT LICENSES
46.39
690.43PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYPOLAR CHEVROLET
690.43
614.17INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESPOLK, MARLA
614.17
311.31PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYPOMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC
311.31
53.22WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERSPROVEN SOLUTIONS
53.22
2,456.16FACILITY OPERATIONS GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICERANDY'S SANITATION INC
1,219.75REC CENTER BUILDING GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE
989.74SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE
4,665.65
62.27POLICE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIESREGENCY OFFICE PRODUCTS LLC
62.27
2,146.93WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESRMR SERVICES
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 4g)
Subject: Vendor Claims 14
2/16/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:28:55R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
14Page -Council Check Summary
2/10/2012 -1/28/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
2,146.93
956.53WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICEROBARGE ENTERPRISES INC
956.53
650.00SPECIAL EVENTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESROSELAWN STABLES
650.00
257.00ADMINISTRATION G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSROTARY CLUB OF SLP
257.00
250.00TRAININGSEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTATRUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQUIPMENT CO
250.00
129.58WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERSSALINAS, REBECCA
129.58
166.00INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESSANDUM, KATHERINE
166.00
132.00INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESSAURER, MARTI
132.00
121.13INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESSCHMIDT, KELLIE
121.13
202.57ASSESSING G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CARSCHOMER, KELLEY
202.57
1,500.00PE DESIGN IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDISEH
1,500.00
23.45GRAFFITI CONTROL OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESSHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO
23.45
48.00ENGINEERING G & A TRAININGSLUC
48.00
110.69PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYSPS COMPANIES INC
110.69
34,711.53CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU COST REIMBURSEMENT-VISIONST LOUIS PARK CONV & VISITORS
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 4g)
Subject: Vendor Claims 15
2/16/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:28:55R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
15Page -Council Check Summary
2/10/2012 -1/28/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
34,711.53
2,109.71PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYSTONEBROOKE EQUIPMENT INC
2,109.71
118.54POLICE G & A POLICE EQUIPMENTSTREICHER'S
590.91RANGEOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
709.45
191.84ESCROWSANDERSON BUILDERSSUN NEWSPAPERS
116.91ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL NOTICES
308.75
767.23PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYSUNSOURCE
767.23
5,508.57WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICESWANSON FLO-SYSTEMS CO
5,508.57
33.81POLICE G & A SUBSISTENCE SUPPLIESTARGET BANK
106.81ERUOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
140.62
95.00GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE TRAININGTCALMC
95.00TRAININGTRAINING
190.00
2,000.00POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESTEENS ALONE
2,000.00
9.03ADMINISTRATION G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESTELELANGUAGE INC
9.03
1,361.04GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESTERMINIX INT
74.56BRICK HOUSE (1324)BUILDING MTCE SERVICE
74.55WW RENTAL HOUSE (1322)BUILDING MTCE SERVICE
97.00BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICE
1,607.15
42.66ADMINISTRATION G & A LONG TERM DISABILITYTHE HARTFORD - PRIORITY ACCOUN
51.90HUMAN RESOURCES LONG TERM DISABILITY
15.51COMM & MARKETING G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 4g)
Subject: Vendor Claims 16
2/16/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:28:55R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
16Page -Council Check Summary
2/10/2012 -1/28/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
39.20IT G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY
33.10ASSESSING G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY
64.49FINANCE G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY
106.69COMM DEV G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY
113.79POLICE G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY
72.21OPERATIONSLONG TERM DISABILITY
54.34INSPECTIONS G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY
40.99PUBLIC WORKS G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY
53.86ENGINEERING G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY
19.25PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY
65.00ORGANIZED REC G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY
19.25PARK MAINTENANCE G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY
16.05ENVIRONMENTAL G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY
16.05WESTWOOD G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY
16.97REC CENTER/AQUATIC PARK SAL LONG TERM DISABILITY
16.51VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A LONG TERM DISABILITY
15.60HOUSING REHAB G & A LONG TERM DISABILITY
19.25WATER UTILITY G&A LONG TERM DISABILITY
1,931.42EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A LONG TERM DISABILITY
2,824.09
58.30WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICETHERMASTOR PRODUCTS GROUP
58.30
24,995.88GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDITIERNEY BROTHERS INC
24,995.88
456.00ADMINISTRATION G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESTIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL
456.00
71.39BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESTOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY
71.39
111,253.65PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYTOWMASTER
111,253.65
151.37PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYTRI STATE BOBCAT
151.37
239.88GARAGE MTCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIESTWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO
239.88
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 4g)
Subject: Vendor Claims 17
2/16/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:28:55R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
17Page -Council Check Summary
2/10/2012 -1/28/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
164.00SNOW PLOWING OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESTWIN CITY OUTDOOR SERVICES INC
1,980.00SSD 1 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
696.00SSD 3 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
2,840.00
30.00ADMINISTRATION G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTATTWIN WEST CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
30.00
211.00ELECTRICAL SYSTEM MTCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICEUHL CO INC
772.38COP SHOP OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
983.38
150.00EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S WAGE GARNISHMENTSUNITED STATES TREASURY
150.00
180.00EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S UNITED WAYUNITED WAY OF MINNEAPOLIS AREA
180.00
85.00PARK MAINTENANCE G & A TRAININGUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
85.00
1,650.00TRAININGTRAININGUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA REGIST
550.00WATER UTILITY G&A TRAINING
2,200.00
112.00HUMAN RESOURCES RECRUITMENTUS HEALTH WORKS MEDICAL GROUP
112.00
9.88WATER UTILITY G&A TELEPHONEUSA MOBILITY WIRELESS INC
9.88
765.80HUMAN RESOURCES RECOGNITIONVAIL, LORI
765.80
234.77ENVIRONMENTAL G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CARVAUGHAN, JIM
234.77
20.00HUMAN RESOURCES RECRUITMENTVERIFIED CREDENTIALS
20.00
1,279.45VOICE SYSTEM MTCE TELEPHONEVERIZON WIRELESS
74.34COMMUNICATIONS/GV REIMBURSEABL TELEPHONE
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 4g)
Subject: Vendor Claims 18
2/16/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:28:55R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
18Page -Council Check Summary
2/10/2012 -1/28/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
1,353.79
929.86WATER UTILITY G&A OTHERVESSCO INC
929.86
767.81WATER UTILITY G&A OTHERVIKING INDUSTRIAL CTR
767.81SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER
767.82STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER
2,303.44
325.00ESCROWSGENERALWALKER PARKING CONSULTANTS
325.00
95.00INSPECTIONS G & A MULTI-FAMILY HOUSINGWALSH, GREGORY
95.00
1,009.97WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICEWATER CONSERVATION SERVICE INC
1,009.97
1,012.55CONCESSIONS/HOCKEY ASSOC CONCESSION SUPPLIESWATSON CO INC
1,012.55
27.64PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYWAYTEK
27.64
1,536.65ELECTRICAL SYSTEM MTCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICEWOLNEY ELECTRIC LLC
6,400.00MUNICIPAL BLDG BUILDING MTCE SERVICE
7,936.65
1,400.48PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A ELECTRIC SERVICEXCEL ENERGY
8,938.74ENTERPRISE G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE
3,665.00GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES
20.81OPERATIONSELECTRIC SERVICE
14,025.03
4,733.70PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYYOCUM OIL CO INC
4,733.70
95.00INSPECTIONS G & A MULTI-FAMILY HOUSINGZAREMBA, DAWN
95.00
978.98SANDING/SALTING EQUIPMENT PARTSZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 4g)
Subject: Vendor Claims 19
2/16/2012CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:28:55R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
19Page -Council Check Summary
2/10/2012 -1/28/2012
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
978.98
385.18PARK AND RECREATION BALANCE SH INVENTORYZIEGLER INC
385.18
Report Totals 1,120,356.03
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 4g)
Subject: Vendor Claims 20
Meeting Date: February 21, 2012
Agenda Item #: 6a
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Public Hearing - Liquor License for Doubletree Park Place Hotel.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Mayor to close public hearing. Motion to Approve on-sale intoxicating liquor license with
Sunday sales to IVC WHH Minneapolis, LLC, dba Doubletree Park Place Hotel located at 1500
Park Place Boulevard in St. Louis Park for the license term of March 1, 2012 through March 1,
2013.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Does the Council wish to approve the on-sale intoxicating liquor license with Sunday sales to the
new ownership of the Doubletree Park Place Hotel for the license term through March 1, 2013?
BACKGROUND:
The City received an application from IVC WHH Minneapolis, LLC for an on-sale intoxicating
liquor license with Sunday sales for Doubletree Park Place Hotel currently under operation at
1500 Park Place Boulevard. Doubletree Hotel has been operating on this site since 1997. The
new ownership, IVC WHH Minneapolis, will be taking over the current Doubletree Hotel
property from the previous owner, W2005 Wyn Hotels whose existing liquor license expires
March 1, 2012.
As required in Section 3-66 of the City Code of Ordinances, a public hearing is required for the
issuance of a liquor license for a different licensee at the same premises.
The establishment’s name and general manager will remain the same. The main principals are
James O’Brien and Jon Hoeffel, LLC Managers; and Henry Buonanni Jr., General Manager.
The Police Department has run a full background investigation and has found no reason to deny
the new ownership based on the investigation. The application and Police report are on file in
the Office of the City Clerk should Council members wish to review the information prior to the
public hearing.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
The fees for new liquor licenses are found in Appendix A - Fee Schedule of the City Code. Total
fees for this applicant include the $500 Investigation Fee and the $8,700 Liquor License Fee.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Not applicable.
Attachments: None
Prepared by: Kay Midura, Office Assistant
Reviewed by: Nancy Stroth, City Clerk
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
Meeting Date: February 21, 2012
Agenda Item #: 6b
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution
Ordinance Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Ordinance Adopting a Charter Amendment Pertaining to Civil Penalties.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Mayor to close public hearing. Motion to Adopt First Reading of Ordinance amending the City
Charter pertaining to Civil Penalties, and to set the second reading for March 5, 2012.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Does the Council wish to make this change to the City Charter to allow for a simpler and more
direct code enforcement procedure (Note - a unanimous vote of the Council is required to amend
the Charter)?
BACKGROUND:
Staff is proposing an ordinance change to implement an administrative penalties system to allow
for a simpler and more direct code enforcement procedure. This procedure would impose
penalties at the City level, providing a quicker and more efficient process than working through
the County Court system. The proposed changes will streamline the process and should reduce
the cost of code enforcement. The City Attorney recommended the City amend the City Charter
in order to make it clear that the City’s intent is to get faster action on unresolved issues, and that
the City has the authority to levy unpaid civil penalties.
Staff presented the proposed administrative penalties process to the City Council in study session
on August 22, 2011 and followed up with written progress reports on November 11, 2011 and
January 9, 2012. Each time, the City Council directed staff to proceed with the administrative
penalties system, and the first key step is amending the City Charter to make it clear that the City
has the authority to levy unpaid civil penalties.
Civil Penalties:
A Civil Penalty is an administrative citation issued as the result of a code enforcement action. A
Civil Penalty is issued to a property owner, business owner, or citizen charged with a code
violation. Although the City has an administrative penalty procedure in place now, the proposed
change would allow the staff to use the process for more violations. It would also include a city
process to appeal the citations, and a process for assessing unpaid fines in a manner similar to a
special assessment.
Implementation of an administrative penalties system requires both amending the City Charter
and the City Code. The process is outlined below.
Charter Amendment Process:
Charter Commission:
The Charter Commission met on December 6, 2011, and voted unanimously to recommend the
City Council adopt the attached amendment to the City Charter. A copy of the meeting minutes
is attached for your information.
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 6b) Page 2
Subject: Ordinance Adopting a Charter Amendment Pertaining to Civil Penalties
City Council:
The City Charter may be amended by means of an Ordinance adopted unanimously by the City
Council. Implementation of an ordinance requires two readings. The second reading is
tentatively scheduled for March 5, 2012.
Publication of the Ordinance:
Once the second reading of the Ordinance is adopted by the City Council, then the amendment
will be advertised, and residents will have 60 days to petition for a referendum on the
amendment. If a petition for a referendum is not submitted, then the amendment is published
once again stating that it will take effect 30 days from the publication date.
Administrative Penalties Ordinance Amendment:
After the Charter Amendment is approved and put into effect, staff will begin the process of
amending the City Code. Staff will present the Ordinance to the City Council in June of 2012.
The proposed Ordinance would modify the existing Civil Penalties Ordinance (Section 1-14
Civil Penalties) and sections of the Zoning Ordinance (Chapter 36). It would allow the
administrative penalty procedure to be used more widely, establish a formal appeal process, and
allow the city to place a lien against a property to collect the fines. This procedure would not
replace the Hennepin County court procedure, but be another method of code enforcement the
City could utilize instead of the county system.
Staff is continuing to work on details pertaining to the implementation of the ordinance,
including the procedures and forms to be utilized when issuing citations, processing an appeal,
and assessing unpaid penalties. A summary of the process will be presented to the Council at a
study session in May, prior to Council consideration of the ordinance which would occur in June.
NEXT STEPS:
1. The second reading of the Ordinance amending the Charter is scheduled for March 5, 2012.
Following approval of the Charter Amendment by the City Council, the amendment will be
advertised, and residents will have 60 days to petition for a referendum on the amendment. If
a petition for a referendum is not submitted, the amendment is published once again stating
that it will take effect 30 days from the publication date.
2. In May, 2012, staff will present to the City Council, a summary of the procedures to be
utilized by staff regarding citations, appeals, and assessing unpaid penalties.
3. On June 18, 2012, the City Council will consider the first reading of amendments to the City
Code to adopt the Administrative Penalties ordinance.
4. On July 2, 2012, the City Council will consider the second reading of amendments to the
City Code to adopt the Administrative Penalties ordinance.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
It is the intent of the civil penalty process to respectfully resolve code violations in a more
expeditious manner will reduce staff time give the City the ability to collect fines through a levy
process.
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 6b) Page 3
Subject: Ordinance Adopting a Charter Amendment Pertaining to Civil Penalties
VISION CONSIDERATION:
The administrative penalties ordinance would assist the City in achieving the City’s Vision of a
well maintained housing stock and neighborhoods.
Attachments: Draft Ordinance Amending the City Charter
Unofficial Minutes of the December 6, 2011 Charter Commission Meeting
Prepared by: Gary Morrison, Assistant Zoning Administrator
Reviewed by: Meg McMonigal, Planning & Zoning Supervisor
Kevin Locke, Community Development Director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 6b) Page 4
Subject: Ordinance Adopting a Charter Amendment Pertaining to Civil Penalties
ORDINANCE NO. ____-12
CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ST. LOUIS PARK
CITY CHARTER CONCERNING CIVIL PENALTIES
PREAMBLE
WHEREAS, pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 410.12, Subd. 7 the Charter Commission has
recommended to the City Council that the Charter be amended as provided herein; and
WHEREAS, Minn. Stat. § 410.12, Subd. 7 provides that upon recommendation of the
Charter Commission the City Council may enact a Charter Amendment by ordinance.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. Chapter 11. Miscellaneous Provisions, Section 11.05 Civil Penalties of the
St. Louis Park City Charter is amended as follows:
Chapter 11. Miscellaneous Provisions
Section 11.05. Civil Penalties.
(a) The City Council may establish by ordinance a procedure for imposing a civil
penalty for any violation of a city ordinance. The procedure must include
provisions to notify the person or entity of the penalty and the opportunity to be
heard in response to the charge.
(b) The City Council may provide by ordinance that unpaid civil penalties be
collected through a process similar to a special assessment against real property if
the penalty relates to the maintenance of the property or to an activity, use, or
delivery of City service associated with the property. The ordinance must provide
that the City should first attempt to obtain voluntary payment of the penalty. The
ordinance must also provide that notice and an opportunity to be heard be given to
the property owner listed on the official tax records before the penalty is assessed.
(c) With respect to unpaid civil penalties assessed against real property pursuant to
Paragraph (b) of this Section, the assessment may include late payment penalties
to cover the administrative and legal costs incurred by the City in connection with
collecting the unpaid penalties.
SECTION 3. This Ordinance shall take effect ninety days after its publication.
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 6b) Page 5
Subject: Ordinance Adopting a Charter Amendment Pertaining to Civil Penalties
Public Hearing and First Reading February 21, 2012
Second Reading March 5, 2012
Date of Publication March 15, 2012
Date Ordinance takes effect June 15, 2012
Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council March 5, 2012
City Manager Mayor
Attest: Approved as to Form and Execution:
City Clerk City Attorney
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 6b) Page 6
Subject: Ordinance Adopting a Charter Amendment Pertaining to Civil Penalties
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
CHARTER COMMISSION MEETING
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
December 6, 2011
7:00 p.m. – City Hall Council Chambers
1. Call to Order
Vice Chair Skinner called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m.
2. Roll Call and Attendance
Members Present: JC Beckstrand, Jim Brimeyer, Gary Carlson, Jim de Lambert, Terry Dwyer,
Brian Fiderlein, Matthew Flory, Ken Gothberg, Nathan Prosser, Pat Skinner, Erica Gutmann
Strohl, and Henry Solmer.
Members Absent: Lynne Carper and Tamara Nugteren (excused).
Others Present: Nancy Stroth, City Clerk/Charter Commission Liaison, Gary Morrison,
Assistant Zoning Administrator, and Tom Scott, City Attorney.
2a. Requests for Excused Absences
It was moved by Commissioner de Lambert, seconded by Commissioner Flory, to accept the
excused absences of Lynne Carper and Tamara Nugteren. The motion was unanimously
approved.
2b. Introduction of New Member and Reappointments
Ms. Stroth introduced new Commissioner Henry Solmer appointed March 11, 2011 with term
expiration on March 11, 2015 and filling the vacancy of Brittney Turner. Commissioner Solmer
then introduced himself.
2c. 2012 Term Expirations
Ms. Stroth reviewed terms of commissioners and indicated a new form is being used for all of
the City’s Boards and Commissions who are seeking reappointment. She requested that
Commissioners Beckstrand and Dwyer, whose terms are up in early 2012, to complete the forms.
3. Approval of Minutes
It was moved by Commissioner Gothberg, seconded by Commissioner Beckstrand, to approve
the minutes of March 9, 2011, as submitted. The motion passed unanimously.
4. Old Business
4a. Review of 2011 Elected Officers
Vice Chair Skinner stated that Lynne Carper currently serves as Chair, he currently serves as
Vice Chair, and Brian Fiderlein currently serves as Secretary.
5. New Business
5a. Proposed Civil Penalty Charter Amendment
Mr. Morrison explained the proposed Charter amendment to Section 11.05 adding language
authorizing the City to implement an administrative penalty program and assess unpaid fines to
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 6b) Page 7
Subject: Ordinance Adopting a Charter Amendment Pertaining to Civil Penalties
properties, similar to the City’s special assessment program. He stated the City would also be
authorized to add a penalty to cover the City’s administrative and legal costs incurred in the
process of assessing the penalties. He indicated the administrative penalty program would create
a citation, similar to the County’s citation process that would keep fees collected in-house and
help pay for the process, would require less staff time, and increase efficiencies. He noted that
the intent of the amendment is not to raise money but is an attempt by the City to recoup all
fines. He added the proposed Charter amendment will provide the City with solid legal ground
for assessment of unpaid fines. He advised that most of the fines are property-related fines in
violation of the City’s zoning ordinance, e.g., vehicles parked illegally, violation of Conditional
Use Permit conditions, disrepair of a fence, or failure to shovel sidewalks.
Mr. Scott explained there is currently no provision under the statute for a statutory city to assess
unpaid fines; however, as a Charter city, the City can add assessment language to its Charter and
other cities have done this.
Commissioner Gutmann Strohl requested clarification regarding Section (d)(2) of the Civil
Penalty Ordinance and how the City will calculate seven days to pay the fine or request a
hearing. She felt that seven calendar days did not give a person sufficient time and suggested
that this be revised to ten or fourteen days.
Commissioner Beckstrand suggested that Section (d)(1) of the proposed Civil Penalty Ordinance
be revised to require citations be issued in person or by certified or registered mail rather than
first class mail. He also agreed with the suggested revision to Section (d)(2) to increase the
number of days to pay a fine or request a hearing.
Commissioner Dwyer asked if the term “person” is broad enough to include an entity as it relates
to Section 11.05(a) of the proposed Home Rule Charter amendment.
Mr. Scott acknowledged that an owner of property charged with a civil penalty could be an entity
and agreed that Section 11.05(a) should be revised to state “…for any person or entity charged
with a civil penalty...”
Vice Chair Skinner questioned whether the third line of Section 11.05(a) of the Charter
amendment should state “person charged with a civil penalty to be affirmatively notified of the
penalty and to have an opportunity to be heard in response to the charge” to avoid a situation
where someone claims they did not know they were served.
Mr. Scott advised that the Charter amendment provides there must be adequate notice resulting
in an opportunity to be heard. He added that the proposed Ordinance will provide further details.
Vice Chair Skinner suggested that the second line of Section 11.05(c) be revised to state
“Paragraph (b) of this Section, the assessment may include a late payment penalty or penalties to
cover…”
It was moved by Commissioner de Lambert, seconded by Commissioner Carlson, to amend
Chapter 11 of the City Charter by adding Section 11.05 pertaining to civil penalties and
assessment of unpaid fines to read as follows:
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 6b) Page 8
Subject: Ordinance Adopting a Charter Amendment Pertaining to Civil Penalties
CHAPTER 11. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
Section 11.05. Civil Penalties.
(a) The City Council may establish by ordinance a procedure for imposing a civil penalty for
any violation of a city ordinance. The procedure must provide an opportunity for any
person or entity charged with a civil penalty to be notified of the penalty and to have an
opportunity to be heard in response to the charge.
(b) The City Council may provide by ordinance that unpaid civil penalties be collected
through a process similar to a special assessment against real property if the violation
relates to the maintenance of the property or to an activity, use, or delivery of City service
associated with the property. The ordinance must provide that the City should first
attempt to obtain voluntary payment of the penalty. The ordinance must also provide that
notice and an opportunity to be heard be given to the property owner listed on the official
tax records before the penalty is assessed.
(c) With respect to unpaid civil penalties assessed against real property pursuant to
Paragraph (b) of this Section, the assessment may include a late payment penalty to cover
the administrative and legal costs incurred by the City in connection with collecting the
unpaid penalties.
Commissioner Prosser asked if the term “person” is adequately defined.
Commissioner Brimeyer asked if the term “property owner” should be used.
Mr. Scott advised that the term “entity” would include property owner. He stated that these
terms can be further defined in the ordinance.
Commissioner Beckstrand suggested a friendly amendment to revise Section 11.05(c) to state
“With respect to unpaid civil penalties assessed against real property pursuant to Paragraph (b) of
this Section, the assessment may include late payment penalties to cover the administrative and
legal costs incurred by the City in connection with collecting the unpaid penalties.”
Commissioner de Lambert agreed to the friendly amendment. Commissioner Carlson seconded
the friendly amendment.
Hearing no objection, Vice Chair Skinner declared the amendment to Section 11.05(c) adopted.
The motion was unanimously approved.
6. Future Meetings
Vice Chair Skinner stated that the next Charter Commission meeting is scheduled for
Wednesday, March 14, 2012 at 7:00 p.m.
7. Communications
7a. Outstanding Citizen Award Program
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 6b) Page 9
Subject: Ordinance Adopting a Charter Amendment Pertaining to Civil Penalties
Ms. Stroth advised that the Outstanding Citizen Award Program is a new program being initiated
by the City and information is on the City’s website. She stated that a task force will be
appointed by the City Council and asked if any of the Charter Commission members were
interested in serving on the task force. She also requested nominations from the Charter
Commission for Outstanding Citizen Award nominees.
8. Adjournment
The meeting adjourned at 7:47 p.m.
Respectfully submitted by:
Nancy Stroth, Charter Commission Liaison and Brian Fiderlein, Secretary
Meeting Date: February 21, 2012
Agenda Item #: 6c
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Public Hearing to Consider Allocation of 2012 Grant Year Community Development Block
Grant (CDBG) Funds.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Mayor to close the public hearing. Motion to Adopt Resolution approving proposed use of 2012
Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program Funds and authorizing
execution of Subrecipient Agreement with Hennepin County and any Third Party Agreements.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Does the City Council concur with the recommendations made for the allocation of the 2012
CDBG funds?
BACKGROUND:
At this time each year the City must decide how to use its annual allocation of CDBG Funds.
The City must submit its proposed use of the allocation to Hennepin County by February 23rd.
Prior to submittal, the City must hold a public hearing.
Council received an overview of the proposed 2012 allocation at its January 23, 2012 study
session via a written report. The St. Louis Park Housing Authority reviewed the proposed
allocation at its February 8, 2012 meeting. One Commissioner stated a preference to allocate
limited funds to activities that directly address housing for low income residents, over assisting
with improvements to facilities that serve low income residents. Staff recommends that if actual
funding levels are less than anticipated, the Perspectives roof replacement allocation be reduced
rather than activities directly funding housing for low income residents.
CDBG funds are US Housing and Urban Development (HUD) funds distributed through
Hennepin County. Nationally, CDBG funding is expected to increase slightly from 2011, and
the County’s estimated allocation has increased by just over one percent. However, SLP’s
allocation is decreasing from $186,843 in 2011 to $173,258 for 2012. The allocation amount for
cities within the county is based on a calculation of 2010 census poverty data. SLP along with
Hopkins, Maple Grove, and Edina, have lower projected 2012 allocations based on 2010 poverty
numbers. Over the past decade CDBG funds for SLP have been trending down; a decade ago
SLP received over $300,000.
The County has advised we keep the proposed allocation flexible to allow for either a decrease or
increase in the final allocation amount and the attached draft resolution does so.
The national objectives of the CDBG program are:
• Benefit low and moderate-income persons (moderate is defined as up to 80% of median
income or $67,200 for a family of four, and low is defined as up to 50% of median income or
$42,000 for a family of four in 2010).
• Prevention or elimination of slum or blight.
• Meet a particular urgent community development need.
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 6c) Page 2
Subject: Public Hearing to Consider Allocation of 2012 Grant Year CDBG Funds
From a policy perspective, the City Council has typically focused CDBG funds on “sticks and
bricks” improvements to the housing stock for low-income families, for both single-family
owners and multifamily housing residents. Over the past years a small portion of funds have
been allocated to support public services for St. Louis Park Housing Authority (SLPHA)
residents and park programming for low-income youth as well as assisting STEP with the
acquisition of a new facility and with renovations at Lenox Center and STEP.
Proposed 2012 CDBG Allocation
The proposed use of our allocation of CDBG funds reflect the priorities described in Vision St.
Louis Park, the City’s housing goals adopted by the Council in the Comprehensive Plan, and the
CDBG national objectives. These priorities include preserving existing housing and increasing
affordable ownership opportunities.
This year’s proposed allocation is summarized in Table 1 below, which is followed by
descriptions of the proposed activities. Sixty-seven percent of the allocation, or $115,758 of the
$173,258, focuses on assisting low-income residents with emergency repairs, rehab loans and
affordable ownership opportunities. The remainder is proposed to assist Perspectives Inc. with a
roof replacement at their facility and a small amount is proposed for youth park programming at
Meadowbrook Manor Park.
The city’s non-profit affordable housing providers have historically received CDBG funds to
assist with their building renovations. A budget spreadsheet is attached that outlines historical
CDBG allocations to the city’s non-profit providers. The providers have completed significant
renovations in recent years. With the continued high need for single family homeowner
assistance and a proposed roofing project to be undertaken by Perspectives, staff did not solicit
requests from other non-profit housing providers this year, nor did any come forward requesting
CDBG assistance.
Table 1: Proposed 2012 CDBG Allocation
Project Activity
Proposed Ongoing
Activity Allocation
Low-Income Single Family Assistance
Low Income Single Family Emergency Repair Program $44,000 yes
Low Income Single Family Home Rehab Loan $43,758 yes
Affordable Housing Land Trust – Homes within Reach $10,000 yes
St. Louis Park Housing Authority – Rehab for scattered site home $18,000 yes
Low-Income Community Assistance
Perspectives Inc. Roof Replacement $50,000 new
Public Service – Youth Park Programming at Meadowbrook Park $7,500 yes
Total $173,258
If the actual allocation is less than the estimated $173,258 the Perspective Roof Replacement
project will be decreased.
Emergency Repair Program – Single Family $44,000
This program is consistent with the Council’s focus on stick and bricks and has proven its
responsiveness to low income seniors and vulnerable residents with annual incomes of 50% or
less of the median area income, or $29,400 for a single person household, and assets less than
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 6c) Page 3
Subject: Public Hearing to Consider Allocation of 2012 Grant Year CDBG Funds
$25,000. It provides grants of up to $4,000 for emergencies such as leaking roofs, plumbing
repairs and water heaters. Community Action Partners for Suburban Hennepin County (CAPSH)
currently administers this program for the City. This is an ongoing CDBG activity.
Low Income Single Family Deferred Loan Program- $43,758
This is the primary ongoing CDBG rehab loan program targeted for homeowners with annual income
of 50% or less of the median area income, or $41,950 for a household of 4, and assets less than
$25,000. The rehab focuses on improvements to bring homes into code compliance and provide long-
term maintenance free housing. The maximum loan amount is $25,000 and is forgiven after 15 years.
Repayment is required if homeowners sell the property before the 15-year period expires.
The demand for our low-income home improvement loans and grants continues to be high. Despite
ongoing funding there is still a waiting list for the low income single family deferred loan program.
Continued funding, along with the program income realized from repayment of previous CDBG
deferred loans, should make it possible to serve three to five residents. This program is administered
by Hennepin County Housing staff.
Affordable Housing Land Trust – Homes within Reach $10,000
Homes within Reach is a program of West Hennepin Housing Land Trust that purchases homes
and sells them to low income homeowners. Buyers pay for the cost of the building only and
lease the land for 99 years. St. Louis Park funds are leveraged with Met Council and Hennepin
County HOME funds, and Homes within Reach administers this activity. Homes within Reach
has purchased eight homes in the city that have been sold to low income families. This program
is consistent with the Council’s focus on using CDBG funds for “sticks and bricks” activities.
St. Louis Park Housing Authority – Renovation of a Scattered Site Homes - $18,000
The SLP Housing Authority provides housing to low income residents that are typically below
50% median income. The HA owns and manages 37 scattered site homes throughout the city.
The HA has requested $18,000 to assist with siding replacement at the 3017 Oregon and 4240
Raleigh Homes. The HA did not request funds for 2011, but continues to have needs for
renovation of its properties.
Perspectives Inc. - $50,000
Perspectives Inc. has requested $55,000 in CDBG funds to assist with the Perspectives Family
Center roof replacement project (see attached letter). Since the city’s allocation has been
reduced, staff is recommending that Perspective’s receive $50,000 which is the same amount
STEP received for their roof replacement in 2011. If there are further reductions to the city’s
allocation, the Perspectives allocation will be reduced.
Replacing the roof is the first of a three-phase, $4,000,000 complete renovation/transformation
of Perspectives Family Center. The estimated roof construction cost is $380,000 and includes
roof replacement, installation of solar panels and vegetation. Based on success of fund raising
efforts the roof project may be scaled back. Perspectives states that the goals of the renovation
include maximizing operation and energy efficiencies, long term financial sustainability and
enhancing program effectiveness. The Family Center, or south campus, is located at Walker and
Gorham Ave. It houses classrooms, a playground, Kids Café, conference rooms, workshop,
reception area and training rooms. It is home to the Kids Connection, clinical services, parenting
time program, volunteer office and office for the admin and program staff.
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 6c) Page 4
Subject: Public Hearing to Consider Allocation of 2012 Grant Year CDBG Funds
The building is 60 years old and in need of major repairs, including new roof, windows, heating
system, handicap accessibility, and energy-efficiency and technology improvements. The full
renovation is expected to meet the LEED, energy and efficiency design standards. The plans
comply with the city’s Green Building Policy. The total estimated cost is $4,047,518.
The CDBG funds would assist with the development of an extensive roof replacement that
includes roof top solar panels. Under Perspectives’ three phase renovation plan, the roof
improvement would be completed before December 31, 2013, which is the deadline for use of
2012 CDBG funds.
Public Service – SLP Park and Rec. Programming at Meadowbrook Manor Parks - $7,500
The Park and Recreation Department provides park programming to children at the
Meadowbrook Manor Apartment Community. The $7,500 would provide an enhanced level of
programming and ensure affordable registration fees. The youth park programming has been
funded with CDBG funds since 2007. Meadowbrook Manor Park is CDBG eligible based on
the poverty levels in this neighborhood.
NEXT STEPS:
The following actions are required to receive 2012 CDBG funds:
February 21, 2012 Public Hearing and Approval of Resolution Outlining Proposed Activities
February 23, 2012 Deadline for Submission of CDBG Application to Hennepin County
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
CDBG funds allow cities discretion (within the HUD guidelines) to fund projects that meet the
national low income objectives and the needs of cities. St. Louis Park will receive an estimated
$173,258 in 2012. The 2012 CDBG year runs from July 1, 2012 through December 31, 2013.
Staff anticipates the proposed projects can expend the funds in a timely manner as has been our
historical practice of fully expending CDBG funds.
In the event the final allocation is more or less than estimated, staff recommends reducing or
increasing the allocation to the SLPHA for rehab of one of their scattered site homes. Staff will
keep Council apprised of actual funding amounts.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
The City Councils adopted Strategic Direction related to housing is, “St. Louis Park is committed
to providing a well-maintained and diverse housing stock”. The use of CDBG funds for the
proposed allocation is consistent with this direction and the national objectives to benefit low and
moderate income persons.
Attachments: Resolution
2012 CDBG Non Profit Affordable Providers - Budget Worksheet
Perspectives Letter of Request for Funding
Prepared by: Kathy Larsen, Housing Programs Coordinator
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 6c) Page 5
Subject: Public Hearing to Consider Allocation of 2012 Grant Year CDBG Funds
DRAFT RESOLUTION NO. 12 - ____
RESOLUTION APPROVING PROPOSED USE OF 2012 URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM FUNDS AND
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENT WITH HENNEPIN
COUNTY AND ANY THIRD PARTY AGREEMENTS
WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park, through execution of a Joint Cooperation Agreement
with Hennepin County, is cooperating in the Urban Hennepin County Community Development
Block Grant Program; and
WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park has developed a proposal for the use of 2012 Urban
Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant funds made available to it; and
WHEREAS, the City held a public hearing on February 21, 2012 to obtain the views of citizens
on housing and community development needs and priorities and the City's proposed use of
$173,528 from the 2012 Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant.
BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of St. Louis Park approves the following projects for
funding from the 2012 Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program
and authorizes submittal of the proposal to Hennepin County.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby authorizes and directs the Mayor
and its City Manager to execute the Subrecipient Agreement and any required Third Party
Agreement on behalf of the City to implement the 2012 Community Development Block Grant
Program.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that should the final amount of FY2012 CDBG available to
the city be different from the preliminary amount provided to the city, the City Council hereby
authorizes the City Manager to adjust project budget(s) to reflect an increase or decrease in
funding.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council February 2012
City Manager
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Project Activity Allocation
Low Income Single Family Emergency Repair Program $44,000
Low Income Single Family Home Rehab Loan $43,758
Affordable Housing Land Trust – Homes within Reach $10,000
St. Louis Park Housing Authority – Rehab for scattered site home $18,000
Perspectives Inc. Roof Replacement $50,000
Public Service – Youth Park Programming at Meadowbrook Park $7,500
Total $173,258
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 6c) Page 6
Subject: Public Hearing to Consider Allocation of 2012 Grant Year CDBG Funds
2012 CDBG Non Profit Affordable Providers - Budget Worksheet
Provider
Number
Units
CDBG
Funding
through 2011
2012
Proposed
Allocation Total
Average
CDBG$
per Unit
Vail Place 7 $25,000 $0 $25,000 $3,571
St. Louis Park Housing Authority -
Scattered Site Homes 37 $63,000 $18,000 $81,000 $2,189
Community Involvement Program 29 $133,800 $0 $133,800 $4,614
Wayside House* 60 $192,200 $0 $192,200 $3,203
Perspectives Inc.** 52 $157,100 $50,000 $207,100 $3,983
Project for Pride in Living -
Louisiana Court 129 $443,000 $0 $443,000 $3,434
Subtotal 314 $1,014,100 $68,000 $1,082,100 $3,446
Facilities - Non Housing
Providers
Lenox Community Center -
Facility 0 $100,000 $0 $100,000 $100,000
St. Louis Park Emergency
Program (STEP) Facility 0 $112,500 $0 $112,500 $112,500
TOTAL
$2,240,700
$2,376,700
*Wayside - 20 apartment units and 40 bed facility
** Perspectives - 52 apartment units and 1 program facility
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 6c) Subject: Public Hearing to Consider Allocation of 2012 Grant Year CDBG Funds Page 7
Meeting Date: February 21, 2012
Agenda Item #: 8a
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Gateway Assisted Living Development.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
• Motion to Adopt Resolution approving the Preliminary and Final Planned Unit
Development for a three-story, 22-unit assisted living building.
• Motion to Adopt Resolution approving the Preliminary and Final Plat.
• Motion to Adopt Resolution approving a Zoning Variance to the rear yard setback
requirement.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Does the proposed plan for a 22-unit assisted living facility satisfy the requirements for
approval?
BACKGROUND:
Requested is Preliminary and Final approval for a Planned Unit Development and Plat, with a
zoning variance regarding setbacks. The PUD would allow for several modifications to Zoning
Ordinance requirements to allow for construction of a three-story, 22-unit building. Of the units
in the building, 12 would be classified for assisted living, or elderly housing. The remaining 10
units would be memory care units. The proposed building, located along Wayzata Boulevard
and just south of I-394, would be 37.5 feet in height and feature underground parking with an
activity-oriented landscaped area to the south of the building.
The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the applications at its January 18th, 2011
meeting. There were no residents present to address the commission. The Planning Commission
recommended approval of the applications. Minutes from the meeting are attached for review.
Project Background:
The site of the proposed Gateway Assisted Living facility has been under review for
development since 2005. The site slopes from south to north, and is topographically higher than
the adjacent roadway system along Wayzata Boulevard. It has commercial uses located to the
east along Wayzata Boulevard, and single family residential properties to the south.
In 2006, the City Council approved a PUD for construction of a three-story, 12-unit
condominium development on the site. Development progressed to the demolition stage, and a
dilapidated house on the site was removed. However, financing was not available to move
forward with construction at that time, and the site has since remained vacant. The original
developer for the site is no longer involved with the project.
Mr. Gori, the applicant, has been working with assisted living operators to develop a concept
plan for development since early 2010. The current proposal would feature underground parking
accessed off of Kentucky Ave. S. via Wayzata Boulevard. Residents of the building would not
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 8a) Page 2
Subject: Gateway Assisted Living Development
drive, so all parking is for the use of staff and guests. The first level of the building would be
used for ten units of memory care. The memory care portion of the building would be fully
secured, and would include a secure outdoor patio area for residents’ use. The second and third
floors would feature larger assisted living units where residents could maintain a partially
independent lifestyle. The developer has included details about the proposed building’s
operations, attached for review.
Public Process
There has been a substantial amount of public process regarding this site since the condominium
proposal was first brought forward in 2005. Besides the current proposal and the condominium
proposal, the applicant also considered bringing forward a proposal for a small retail
development in 2009. Although he held a neighborhood meeting to explore the idea with
neighbors, he did not apply to the City for any of the approvals that would have been necessary
to move forward with that proposal. Most recently, the applicant held a neighborhood meeting
with residents from the surrounding area on August 25th, 2011 to discuss the assisted living
concept. There were five residents in attendance, with a variety of questions about the building
layout and operations.
As noted, there were no residents in attendance at the Planning Commission public hearing.
Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development Request:
There are two uses associated with the proposal, each classified differently under the Zoning
Ordinance. The first is for the assisted living portion of the building, classified as “elderly
housing” in the Zoning Ordinance. The second is for the memory care portion of the building,
classified as “nursing care” in the Zoning Ordinance. Nursing care in the RC district is permitted
with conditions, including the size of the site, building location, and the provision of DORA.
The conditions are met. Elderly housing in the RC district requires a Conditional Use Permit, or
can be allowed through the use of a PUD; those conditions relate to the size of the site and the
filing of covenants to ensure long-term use for elderly housing.
The applicant has applied for a combined PUD. The combined process allows for approval of
the preliminary and final PUD concurrently, with the understanding that the site plans are
sufficiently finalized to allow the development to move forward directly to application for a
building permit. The applicant chose to apply for a PUD to obtain modifications to the Zoning
Ordinance requirements. To qualify for a PUD, the applicant must demonstrate that the
development has a high standard of building and site design, and more creative and efficient use
of land than would otherwise be allowed under the Zoning Ordinance.
The request for a Planned Unit Development would allow for the following modifications:
• Increase in the maximum permitted Ground Floor Area Ratio (from 0.25 to 0.28).
• Reduction in setback requirements for the front setback along Wayzata Boulevard (from
37.5 feet to 15.2 feet).
• Reduction in the total number of off-street parking spaces provided (from 19 to 16).
• Use of alternative landscaping to count for a portion of the total landscaping requirement.
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 8a) Page 3
Subject: Gateway Assisted Living Development
The following table details the overall zoning analysis:
Zoning Details:
Zoning Ordinance
Requirements: Proposed Site Condition:
Proposed: RH – Multi-Family
Residential Elderly housing / Memory care
Approvals required: Permitted / CUP Planned Unit Development
Site size: 15,800 square feet 16,150 square feet (0.37 acres)
Maximum density: 75 units / acre 59 units / acre
Maximum FAR: 1.2 1.12
Front Setback: 37.5 feet (Wayzata Blvd.) 15.2 feet (PUD)
Side Yard 1: 15 feet (Kentucky Ave.) 15 feet
Side Yard 2: 18 feet (west side) 18.9 feet
Rear Setback: 37.5 feet (south side) 25 feet (Variance)
Building height: 75 feet or 6 stories 37.5 feet with parapet
Outdoor storage: Prohibited Fully enclosed
Off-street Parking 19 spaces 16 spaces (PUD)
Ground Floor Area Ratio
The modification to the maximum allowed GFAR under the PUD increases the maximum
portion of the site covered by a building from 0.25 to 0.28. The development also benefits from
a bonus provided under the parking regulations of the Zoning Ordinance, which provides an
additional 300 square feet of lot area toward the calculation of the GFAR for every off-street
parking space provided in an underground garage.
GFAR regulations are different from Floor Area Ratio (FAR) regulations. While the FAR
regulates the bulk and mass of a building on a site, the GFAR limits the overall footprint of a
building.
Setback Analysis
The applicant has requested a reduction under the PUD regulations to the minimum setback
requirement for the front yard. It would be reduced from 37.5 feet (the height of the building) to
15.2 feet. As the building is sited along Wayzata Boulevard, it is desirable to move the building
toward the sidewalk along Wayzata Boulevard. In this location, placing the building closer to
the street will improve the pedestrian environment for people using the adjacent sidewalk to
reach the Metro Transit park and ride lot immediately across the street.
PUD reductions for setbacks are not permitted for portions of a lot adjacent to a residential
property. For this reason, the applicant has requested a variance to the setback requirements for
the south property line. The variance request is discussed later in this report.
Off-Street Parking
The total off-street parking requirement is 19 spaces. The requirements for the two uses are:
• Elderly housing: One space per bedroom (12 spaces)
• Nursing care: Five spaces plus one per five beds (7 spaces)
• Total requirement: 19 spaces.
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 8a) Page 4
Subject: Gateway Assisted Living Development
The development includes a total of 16 off-street parking spaces. Of those, 12 spaces are
provided underground and four are provided in a surface level parking lot. There are also on-
street parking spaces provided in the adjacent cul-de-sac; those could be used for occasional
overflow parking as needed by the development.
Parking demand is detailed in an attachment regarding operations provided by the application.
The maximum number of staff members on site at any given time will not exceed six people,
which will be during the AM shift (between 6:30 AM and 3:30 PM). The residents of the facility
are not expected to have vehicles for personal use, but will likely have occasional guests. Guests
who arrive with regularity will be allowed to park in the underground parking area. Less
frequent guests will use the outdoor parking area to the east of the building.
Bicycle parking is required for all new developments in the City. The total bicycle parking
requirement for the development is based on the institutional requirement of 1 space per ten
parking spaces, or not less than four bicycle parking spaces. The developer is installing six
bicycle parking spaces on the site, exceeding the requirement.
Landscaping & Tree Replacement
The applicant is requesting a moderate reduction in the overall landscaping requirement for a
fairly large building on a fairly small site. The requirement and proposed planting is as follows:
• Tree requirement: 22 trees (13 proposed)
• Shrub requirement: 108 shrubs (129 proposed).
The challenge in meeting the tree planting requirement results in part because there are mature
trees located on the site along Wayzata Boulevard that the applicant plans to retain. To
accommodate the shortfall in the overall landscape requirement, the applicant is proposing the
use of alternative landscaping provision in the City’s ordinance. They will meet the alternative
landscaping requirements by providing extra shrubs and an outdoor patio located on the
building’s first floor.
The outdoor patio would be located on the south side of the building and would support the
residents living in the memory care area of the building. It would include landscaped planters,
outdoor seating, and areas designed for contemplation or structured activity with residents and
staff. The patio will be fully secured, and include a six-foot black aluminum fence to ensure the
safety of residents. It will be well screened and buffered from the adjacent single family homes.
Designed Outdoor Recreation Area
A total of 1,975 square feet of Designed Outdoor Recreation Area (DORA) is proposed. The
proposal exceeds the total requirement for 1,938 square feet of DORA. DORA elements to the
plan include the outdoor patio available for first floor residents, pedestrian elements including a
sidewalk connection between the neighborhood to the south and to the rest of the City via the
sidewalk along Wayzata Boulevard. The pedestrian elements would be augmented through the
use of pedestrian amenities including benches.
The developer will be responsible for long term maintenance of the new sidewalk and benches.
They meet all City standards for accessibility and will be reviewed following installation by the
City’s Public Works Department.
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 8a) Page 5
Subject: Gateway Assisted Living Development
Traffic Analysis
A traffic analysis was completed for the condominium project in 2005 and determined that there
would be a minimal impact resulting from the construction of 12 additional housing units in this
location. Based on data regarding traffic generation for different types of development, the
proposed assisted living facility will generate less traffic than the previous proposal. For this
reason, a new traffic study was not completed. It is not expected that the assisted living staff or
guests will generate a sufficient number of vehicle trips to impact the operations at the Wayzata
Boulevard / Louisiana Avenue intersection.
Building Materials
The proposed building would be constructed of brick, glass, and stucco. These materials are all
classified as Class I materials under the Zoning Ordinance, which requires that buildings be
constructed with a minimum of 60% Class I materials.
The architectural requirements governing shading are not of concern due to the location of the
proposed building. During the winter months, no shade will fall on adjacent properties as the
building is located at the northernmost point on Kentucky Avenue in St. Louis Park.
Engineering Comments
The City Engineer reviewed the plans and has determined that there is sufficient utility access,
including to the City’s water, sewer, and storm sewer system, to allow the project to proceed.
The Engineering comments included concerns regarding the method for constructing the
north/south sidewalk along Kentucky Avenue South; issues include the slope of the sidewalk and
the placement and potential need for retaining walls adjacent to the sidewalk. Since the Planning
Commission meeting, the City Engineer has met with the developer to develop solutions for an
improved sidewalk design. The changes to the sidewalk design do not impact the overall site
plan or development design.
The stormwater management for the site will be handled to the west of the building in a small
pond. The pond will capture most of the runoff from the building and will reduce the rate of
inflow into the City’s stormwater system during major rain events, and will also improve water
quality.
Variance Request:
A variance is requested from the setback requirement along the south property line of the
development site. The variance would reduce the setback requirement from 37.5 feet (the
building’s height) to 25 feet.
The original condominium PUD was approved without a variance. That approval was provided
based on a setback reduction provided through the PUD process. Since that time, additional
review of the PUD regulations has indicated that setback reductions through the PUD are not a
permitted modification for portions of a site lying adjacent to a residential property.
Variance Analysis
Following modifications to state law during the 2011 legislative session, the City Council
adopted new regulations for Zoning Variances; the changes, among other things, eliminated the
term “hardship” and substituted the term “practical difficulty.” The regulations set forth the
following criteria for consideration as to whether a variance should be granted:
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 8a) Page 6
Subject: Gateway Assisted Living Development
1. Circumstances unique to the property include the shape, topography, water conditions,
or other physical conditions unique to the property
The applicant has stated that “the irregular and peculiar shape of the lot necessitates locating
the building closer to the R1 lot to the south to create a viable building footprint.” Generally
speaking, the 1324 Kentucky Ave. S. lot is triangular, the result of a Mn/DOT action during
construction of I-394 and Wayzata Boulevard. The angled lot impacts building placement,
whereby a building constructed to face Wayzata Boulevard is restricted in size by the rear
setback adjacent to the single family home.
2. The granting of the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right of the applicant
The applicant’s response to this question states that “this variance would enable the creation
of a quality elderly housing facility with ample outdoor recreation areas and indoor amenity
spaces.”
The variance is necessary to move forward with construction of a multi-family housing
development, in this case a 22-unit development for elderly and memory care residents,
which conforms to the intent of the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance use
recommendations for the site.
3. The granting of the variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to the
adjacent property, unreasonably increase the congestion in the public streets, increase
the danger of fire, or endanger public safety; and,
The applicant’s statement in regard to this question references the distance between the
existing home and the proposed structure, which is 67 feet (including 25 feet on the
applicant’s site and 42 feet on the adjacent site, which is a double lot).
In addition to the applicant’s statement, it should be noted that the proposed development
will serve as a buffer between the adjacent neighborhood and the noise and odors from traffic
and other impacts incidental to the location of I-394 and the nearby Metro Transit Park and
Ride facility. The development is also located at the north end of the neighborhood, which
reduces concern about impacts to solar access.
4. The granting of the variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant but
is necessary to alleviate a practical difficulty.
The practical difficulty cited by the applicant is the irregular site and the need to construct a
building that will serve as a quality structure for seniors that will elevate the value of the
surrounding properties and enhance the quality of life and security for the neighborhood.
It is also noted that from a practical standpoint, construction of a rectangular building on this
site without a variance may make development infeasible, due to the site’s irregular shape.
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 8a) Page 7
Subject: Gateway Assisted Living Development
Variance Summary
The proposed variance for a setback reduction from the required 37.5 feet along the rear property
line to a distance of 25 feet from the rear property line meets the guidelines recommended in the
Zoning Ordinance for a variance.
The Planning Commission and Staff both recommend approval of the variance request.
Preliminary and Final Plat Request:
The preliminary and final plat documents meet the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance.
The applicant has requested to plat the property in order to combine the two lots into one.
Because the plat request is associated with a lot combination, the City Engineer reviewed
existing easements and lot configurations as part of the proposal. It was determined that some
additional easements were needed, but most importantly, that additional property be dedicated as
right-of-way along the Kentucky Avenue cul-de-sac on the east side of the property. For this
reason, the applicant has dedicated that property and also provided a five-foot easement in that
location.
In addition to the review of lot configuration and easements, the developer will also be required
to pay park dedication and trail dedication fees associated with the development. For the twenty-
two unit building, those fees are as follows:
• Park Dedication: $33,000.00
• Trail Dedication: $4,950.00
A development agreement, associated with both the PUD and Plat approvals, will be required
should the development be approved. The development agreement will lay out parameters for
payment of the park and trail dedication fees.
Summary:
The applicant has requested preliminary and final approval of a PUD and Plat as well as a
Variance to setback requirements. If approved, the proposal for construction of a three-story, 22-
unit assisted living/memory care building would be allowed to move forward following the
completion of a development agreement and payment of the required fees. The PUD application
allows for four primary modifications to the Zoning Ordinance:
1. An increase in allowable Ground Floor Area Ratio
2. A reduction in the north setback along Wayzata Boulevard
3. A reduction in the total number of off-street parking spaces required, based on verifiable
information related to proposed building operations
4. Modifications to landscaping regulations to allow for the use of alternative landscaping.
The Planning Commission and Staff recommend approval of all applications, subject to the
conditions of the resolutions.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
None.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
The proposed Gateway Assisted Living development fits within the Strategic Direction adopted
by the Council in 2007 to provide a well-maintained and diverse housing stock.
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 8a) Page 8
Subject: Gateway Assisted Living Development
Attachments: Resolution – Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development
Resolution – Preliminary and Final Plat
Resolution - Variance
Minutes – Planning Commission meeting of January 18, 2012
Location Map
Development and Operations Summary
Site Plan and Related Documents
Prepared by: Adam Fulton, Planner
Reviewed by: Meg McMonigal, Planning and Zoning Supervisor
Kevin Locke, Community Development Director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 8a) Page 9
Subject: Gateway Assisted Living Development
RESOLUTION NO. 12-____
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT (PUD) UNDER SECTION 36-367 OF THE ST. LOUIS PARK
ORDINANCE CODE RELATING TO ZONING FOR PROPERTY ZONED R-C HIGH
DENSITY MULTIPLE FAMIY RESIDENTIAL LOCATED AT
1324 AND 1332 KENTUCKY AVENUE SOUTH
WHEREAS, an application for approval of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) was
received on November 21, 2011 from the applicant, and
WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing on the Preliminary and Final PUD was mailed to
all owners of property within 350 feet of the subject property plus other affected property owners
in the vicinity, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the Preliminary and Final PUD at the
meeting of January 18, 2012, and
WHEREAS, notice of public hearing on the Preliminary and Final PUD was published
in the St. Louis Park Sailor on January 5, 2012, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission opened the public hearing at the meeting of
January 18, 2012, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Preliminary and
Final PUD on a 6-0 vote with all members present voting in the affirmative, and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the staff reports, Planning Commission
minutes and testimony of those appearing at the public hearing or otherwise including comments
in the record of decision.
BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park:
Findings
1. Viren Gori has made application to the City Council for a Planned Unit Development
under Section 36-367 of the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code within the R-C – High Density
Multiple Family Residential district located at 1324 and 1332 Kentucky Avenue South for the
legal description as follows, to-wit:
Parcel 1
That part of Lots 355 and 356, “Richmond”, lying Southeasterly of the following
described line; Beginning at a point on the West line of said Lot 356, distant 3 feet North
of the Southwest corner thereof; thence run Northeasterly to the Northeast corner of Lot
355, said Richmond and there terminating, except any portion thereof taken for highway
or street purposes, Hennepin County, Minnesota
Parcel 2
Lots 357 and 358, Richmond, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the
office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 8a) Page 10
Subject: Gateway Assisted Living Development
2. The City Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning
Commission (Case No. 11-32-PUC) and the effect of the proposed PUD on the health, safety and
welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, the
effect on values of properties in the surrounding area, the effect of the use on the Comprehensive
Plan, and compliance with the intent of the Zoning Ordinance.
3. The City Council has determined that the PUD will not be detrimental to the health,
safety, or general welfare of the community, nor with certain contemplated traffic improvements
will it cause traffic congestion or hazards, nor will it seriously depreciate surrounding property
values. The Council has also determined that the proposed PUD is in harmony with the general
purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan and that the requested
modifications comply with the requirements of Section 36-367(b)(5). The specific modifications
include:
a. An increase in allowable Ground Floor Area Ratio from 0.25 to 0.28.
b. A reduction in the north setback along Wayzata Boulevard from 37.5 feet to 15.2 feet.
c. A 15% reduction in the total number of off-street parking spaces required, reducing the
number of spaces from 19 to 16.
d. Modifications to landscaping regulations to allow for the use of alternative landscaping.
4. The contents of Planning Case File 11-32-PUD are hereby entered into and made part of
the public hearing record and the record of decision for this case.
Conclusion
The Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development at the location described is approved
based on the findings set forth above and subject to the following conditions:
1. The site shall be developed, used and maintained in conformance with the Official
Exhibits.
2. A development agreement between the City and the developer shall be required to
address payment of fees and financial guarantees.
3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the following conditions shall be met:
a. The developer shall submit a financial security in the form of cash escrow or letter
of credit in the amount of 125% of the costs of public sidewalk installation,
repair/cleaning of public streets/utilities, and tree replacement/landscaping.
b. All necessary permits shall be obtained.
c. The developer shall make any revisions to the utility and grading plans required by
the City Engineer.
d. The landscape plan and species selection shall be revised as required by the City
Environmental Coordinator.
e. Color samples of all building materials shall be submitted and approved by the
Zoning Administrator.
f. A Lighting Plan, including light fixture details, shall be submitted and approved by
the Zoning Administrator.
4. The applicant shall comply with the following conditions during construction:
a. The site shall be kept free of dust and debris that could blow onto neighboring
properties.
b. Public streets shall be maintained free of dirt and shall be cleaned as necessary.
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 8a) Page 11
Subject: Gateway Assisted Living Development
c. Construction access to the site shall be provided from the north cul-de-sac along
Kentucky Avenue South with access primarily from Wayzata Boulevard. The
south cul-de-sac with access into the Eliot neighborhood shall be used only
incidentally and no construction staging whatsoever shall take place in that
location. Construction parking shall take place along Kentucky Avenue to the
south of the site.
d. Hours of construction on weekdays shall be limited to the hours between 7:00 AM
and 9:00 PM.
e. Hours of construction on weekends shall be limited to the hours between 9:00 AM
and 5:00 PM.
f. The Zoning Administrator may impose additional conditions if it becomes
necessary in order to mitigate the impact of excavation on surrounding properties.
5. A total of 22 bicycle parking spaces are required. Proof of bicycle parking is
acceptable for outdoor bicycle parking; a minimum of 6 outdoor bicycle parking
spaces must be provided at the time of construction.
6. A minimum of two benches for public use must be installed along the public
sidewalks adjacent to the site.
7. All utility structures and refuse or recycling storage areas shall be depicted on the site
plan prior to issuance of a building permit. Such structures or areas shall be internal
to the building or screened using materials similar in design and quality to the
materials used for the principal building on the site.
8. No outdoor storage shall be permitted.
In addition to any other remedies, the developer or owner shall pay an administrative fee of $750
per violation of any condition of this approval.
Pursuant to Section 36-367(e)(6) of the Zoning Ordinance, the City will require execution of a
development agreement as a condition of approval of the Preliminary and Final PUD. The
development agreement shall address those issues which the City Council deems appropriate and
necessary. The Mayor and City Manager are authorized to execute the development agreement.
The City Clerk is instructed to record certified copies of this resolution in the Office of the
Hennepin County Register of Deeds or Registrar of Titles as the case may be.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council February 21, 2012
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 8a) Page 12
Subject: Gateway Assisted Living Development
RESOLUTION NO. 12-____
RESOLUTION GIVING APPROVAL FOR PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT
OF GATEWAY PLAZA
BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of St. Louis Park:
Findings
1. Viren Gori, owner and subdivider of the land proposed to be platted as Gateway
Plaza has submitted an application for approval of preliminary and final plat of said subdivision
in the manner required for platting of land under the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code, and all
proceedings have been duly had thereunder.
2. The proposed preliminary and final plat has been found to be in all respects
consistent with the City Plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of
Minnesota and the ordinances of the City of St. Louis Park.
3. The proposed plat is situated upon the following described lands in Hennepin
County, Minnesota, to-wit:
Parcel 1
That part of Lots 355 and 356, “Richmond”, lying Southeasterly of the following
described line; Beginning at a point on the West line of said Lot 356, distant 3 feet North
of the Southwest corner thereof; thence run Northeasterly to the Northeast corner of Lot
355, said Richmond and there terminating, except any portion thereof taken for highway
or street purposes, Hennepin County, Minnesota
Parcel 2
Lots 357 and 358, Richmond, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the
office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota
Conclusion
1. The proposed preliminary and final plat of Gateway Plaza is hereby approved and
accepted by the City as being in accord and conformity with all ordinances, City plans and
regulations of the City of St. Louis Park and the laws of the State of Minnesota, provided,
however, that this approval is made subject to the opinion of the City Attorney and Certification
by the City Clerk subject to the following conditions:
a. The developer or owner shall pay an administrative fee of $750 per violation of any
condition of this approval.
b. Prior to release of the final plat, the developer shall provide the following:
1. A signed development agreement.
2. A Park Dedication Fee in the amount of $33,000.00
3. A Trail Dedication Fee in the amount of $4,950.00
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 8a) Page 13
Subject: Gateway Assisted Living Development
2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to supply two certified copies of this Resolution
to the above-named owner and subdivider, who is the applicant herein.
3. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute all contracts
required herein, and the City Clerk is hereby directed to execute the certificate of approval on
behalf of the City Council upon the said plat when all of the conditions set forth in Paragraph
No. 1 above and the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code have been fulfilled.
4. Such execution of the certificate upon said plat by the City Clerk, as required
under Section 26-123(1)j of the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code, shall be conclusive showing of
proper compliance therewith by the subdivider and City officials charged with duties above
described and shall entitle such plat to be placed on record forthwith without further formality.
The City Clerk is instructed to record certified copies of this resolution in the Office of the
Hennepin County Register of Deeds or Registrar of Titles as the case may be.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council February 21, 2012
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 8a) Page 14
Subject: Gateway Assisted Living Development
RESOLUTION NO. 12-____
A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCE FROM SECTION 36-167 OF THE
ORDINANCE CODE RELATING TO ZONING TO REDUCE THE REAR YARD
SETBACK FOR PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE R-C – HIGH DENSITY MULTIPLE
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT AT
1324 AND 1332 KENTUCKY AVENUE SOUTH
BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of St. Louis Park, Minnesota:
Findings
1. Viren Gori has applied for a variance from Section 36-167 of the Ordinance Code
relating to zoning to reduce the rear yard setback from 37.5 feet to 25 feet for property
located in the R-C High Density Multiple Family Residential Zoning District at the
following location, to-wit:
Parcel 1
That part of Lots 355 and 356, “Richmond”, lying Southeasterly of the following
described line; Beginning at a point on the West line of said Lot 356, distant 3
feet North of the Southwest corner thereof; thence run Northeasterly to the
Northeast corner of Lot 355, said Richmond and there terminating, except any
portion thereof taken for highway or street purposes, Hennepin County,
Minnesota
Parcel 2
Lots 357 and 358, Richmond, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in
the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota
2. On January 18, 2012, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, received testimony
from the public, discussed the application and moved approval of a variance to reduce
the rear yard setback from 37.5 feet to 25 feet.
3. The Planning Commission has considered the effect of the proposed variance upon the
health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions,
light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, the effect on values of property in
the surrounding area, and the effect of the proposed variance upon the Comprehensive
Plan.
4. Because of conditions on the subject property and surrounding property, it is possible to
use the property in such a way that the proposed variance will not impair an adequate
supply of light and air to the adjacent property, unreasonably increase the congestion in
the public streets, increase the danger of fire, endanger the public safety, unreasonably
diminish or impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to
the intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan.
5. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such
property or immediately adjoining property and do not apply generally to other land or
structures in the district in which such land is located.
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 8a) Page 15
Subject: Gateway Assisted Living Development
6. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right of the applicant. It will not merely serve as a convenience to
the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable practical difficulty.
7. The contents of Planning Case File 11-34-VAR are hereby entered into and made part of
the public hearing record and the record of decision of this case.
8. Under the Zoning Ordinance, this variance shall be deemed to be abandoned, revoked, or
canceled if the holder shall fail to complete the work on or before one year after the
variance is granted.
9. Under the Zoning Ordinance, this variance shall be revoked and cancelled if the building
or structure for which the variance is granted is removed.
CONCLUSION
The application for the variance is granted based upon the findings set forth above, as follows:
1. The Zoning Variance approval allows for a reduction in the setback along the south
property line from a minimum distance of 37.5 feet to a minimum distance of 25 feet.
The City Clerk is instructed to record certified copies of this resolution in the Office of the
Hennepin County Register of Deeds or Registrar of Titles as the case may be.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council February 21, 2012
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 8a) Page 16
Subject: Gateway Assisted Living Development
DRAFT MINUTES – PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JANUARY 18, 2012
A. Gateway Assisted Living Preliminary and Final Plat and PUD, Variance
Location: 1324 and 1332 Kentucky Avenue South
Applicant: Viren Gori
Case No.: 11-31-S, 11-32-PUD, 11-34-VAR
Adam Fulton, Planner, presented the staff report.
Commissioner Morris said in looking at the configuration of the existing parcel it appears
the variance portion of it is not an area created by the property owner. It’s a remnant
created by MnDOT acquisition.
Mr. Fulton responded that is correct. When MnDOT constructed I-394 they also
constructed the Wayzata Blvd. frontage road and made some modifications. The parcel
is shaped the way it is directly due to that taking.
Commissioner Carper asked about screening provided for the adjacent homes.
Mr. Fulton stated that setback requirement for a building like this is relates to the height.
This building height is 37 ½ ft. The reduction is 12 ½ ft., bringing the first floor of the
building to within 25 ft. from the south property line. From the house to the assisted
living building is 67 ft. The applicant has proposed the installation of trees and shrubs in
that area to improve the screening between the properties. He added that there is also
some vegetation on the adjacent homeowner’s property as well.
Commissioner Carper asked about the grade change between the adjacent property and
the assisted living building.
Mr. Fulton responded that immediately south of the two parcels is a single family home
on a double lot which is perhaps a foot higher than the 1324 Kentucky lot.
Commissioner Carper asked if there would be adequate rooftop screening on the
proposed building.
Mr. Fulton said the mechanical equipment is not going to be located right on the south
part of the roof, but toward the middle.
Commissioner Kramer asked about access for emergency vehicles.
Mr. Fulton said the Fire Marshall and Building Official have looked at the access for
emergency vehicles in detail. He explained that an ambulance will be able to pull into
the cul-de-sac and back up to the building, and into the underground parking garage.
Viren Gori, applicant, provided a brief history of the properties.
Commissioner Carper remarked that the proposed building is very nice looking. He
spoke about the front of the building which faces I-394. He asked what kind of sound
proofing will be provided.
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 8a) Page 17
Subject: Gateway Assisted Living Development
Mr. Gori said enhanced sound installation and double-paned windows will be provided.
He remarked that an assisted living facility works well at this site because most of the
residents keep their windows shut which will mitigate some of the sound. The building
temperature is highly controlled. Studies are showing that the new trend with assisted
living and memory care residents is that they like to be where the action is. They like to
see traffic. They like to see pedestrians and activity.
Commissioner Morris spoke about memory care units being on the first floor, and
commented that generally those units require a greater amount of security and access
control. He asked what security would be provided.
Mr. Gori said the patio area to the south is completely enclosed. It will have a guard rail
and a locked gate. The elevator and lobby will have controlled access.
Chair Kramer opened the public hearing.
Vince Forystek, owner of two properties located across Louisiana at 7218/7224 14th St.
W., asked what the fence securing the patio area would look like. He said he hoped it
would not be a chain link fence.
Mr. Gori responded that it would be a non-institutional looking wrought-iron fence.
Mr. Vorystek stated it would be good if ambulances could only access the north cul-de-
sac.
Mr. Fulton said the only access to the property is from the north cul-de-sac. There is no
access off of Kentucky Ave. S.
Chair Kramer closed the public hearing as no one else was present wishing to speak.
Commissioner Johnston-Madison stated she likes the project and feels it is an excellent
use for that area and for St. Louis Park.
Commissioner Robertson said he was glad to see a project move ahead on the property.
He spoke about the difficult configuration and this is a use that works very well.
Commissioner Morris said he is glad to see an environment where memory care residents
aren’t so isolated and can mingle with assisted living residents. He likes the plan layout
and the concept.
Commissioner Carper stated he likes the project, including the façade of the building.
Commissioner Person made a motion to recommend approval of the Preliminary and
Final Plat, Preliminary and Final PUD, and Variance, subject to conditions included by
staff. Commissioner Morris seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 6-0.
14TH ST W
WAYZATA BLVD
INTERSTATE 394
IDAHO AVE SLOUISIANA AVE SJERSEY AVE SKENTUCKY AVE SLOUISIANA AVE S TO EB I394
MARYLAND AVE SEB I394 TO LOUISIANA AVE S
TRANSIT CENTER SERVI RD
INTERSTATE 394
Zoning Classifications
C1 - Neighborhood Commercial
C2 - General Commercial
IG - General Industrial
IP - Industrial Park
MX - Mixed-Use
O - Office
R1 - Single Family
R2 - Single Family
R3 - Two Family
R4 - Multiple Family
RC - High Density
(Case No. 05-28-CP and 05-29-RZ) Kentucky Avenue - Urban Lofts
0 220110 Feet
$
June 21, 2005
3
R-2 R-4
C-2
C-2
Louisiana AvenueI-394I-394
Kentucky AvenueWayzata Boulevard
X
R-2
R-2R-2
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 8a)
Subject: Gateway Assisted Living Development Page 18
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 8a)
Subject: Gateway Assisted Living Development Page 19
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 8a)
Subject: Gateway Assisted Living Development Page 20
St. Louis Park – 22 Suites
Staffing/Hours Worked
Executive Director 40 hrs/week (M – F)
LEC 25 hrs/week (M – F)
Kitchen 49 hrs/week (M – S)
RN 20 hrs/week (M – F)
HHA 315 hrs/week (M – S)
(45hrs/day)
Hours worked
LEC hours_________________
M-F 10:00-3:00
Kitchen hours______________
M-F 10:00-5:30
W/E 10:00-5:30
HHA shifts _____
AM #1 6:30-3:00
AM #2 6:30-3:00
PM #1 2:45-10:45
PM #2 2:45-10:45
NOC #1 10:30-6:30
NOC #2 10:30-6:30
AM Staff total: 6 staff on M – F and 3 on the weekend
PM Staff total: 3 staff
NOC Staff total: 2 staff
*hours subject to change depending on acuity level
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 8a)
Subject: Gateway Assisted Living Development Page 21
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 8a)
Subject: Gateway Assisted Living Development Page 22
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 8a) Subject: Gateway Assisted Living DevelopmentPage 23
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 8a)
Subject: Gateway Assisted Living Development Page 24
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 8a)
Subject: Gateway Assisted Living Development Page 24
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 8a)
Subject: Gateway Assisted Living Development Page 25
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 8a)
Subject: Gateway Assisted Living Development Page 26
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 8a)
Subject: Gateway Assisted Living Development Page 27
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 8a) Subject: Gateway Assisted Living DevelopmentPage 28
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 8a) Subject: Gateway Assisted Living DevelopmentPage 29
Meeting Date: February 21, 2012
Agenda Item #: 8b
Regular Meeting Public Hearing Action Item Consent Item Resolution Ordinance
Presentation Other:
EDA Meeting Action Item Resolution Other:
Study Session Discussion Item Written Report Other:
TITLE:
Resolution Approving 2012-2013 International Union of Operating Engineers (IUOE) Local #49
Labor Agreement.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to Adopt Resolution approving a Labor Agreement between the City and the Local #49
bargaining group, establishing terms and conditions of employment for two years, from 1/1/12 –
12/31/13.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Does Council wish to approve the Labor Agreement between the City and the Union?
BACKGROUND:
Staff is pleased to bring to Council the details of this contract agreement between the City and
the Local 49 Union for 2012-2013. This is the fourth contract (of five total) that we have
reached agreement for 2012-2013.
The City and the Union have come to agreement on the following changes to the contract:
• Duration of 2 years (1/1/12 – 12/31/13).
• 2012 Wages: Increase of 2% (consistent with non-union and other settled groups).
• 2013 Wages: Increase of 2% (consistent with other settled groups).
• 2012 Health Insurance: Same as 2011, no increase in employer contribution. Employer
contribution for health insurance consistent with non-union for 2012 at $815 per month.
If electing the high deductible health plan, the employer contribution is set at $606.66 for
premiums and $208.34 for VEBA contribution.
• 2013 Health Insurance: Employer contribution for health insurance consistent with other
groups.
• 2012 and 2013 Wellness: Continued participation in any City provided wellness
incentive programs.
• 2012 Deferred Compensation (effective 6/1/12): City contribution of $10 per pay period
with a minimum employee contribution of $50 per pay period to eligible deferred
compensation programs.
o COMMENT: This is a new benefit for this group, and is consistent with what is
provided to other settled groups.
• 2013 Long Term Disability: New language has been added in which the City will
provide long term disability insurance coverage for employees.
o COMMENT: This is a new benefit for this group, and is consistent with what is
provided to other settled groups.
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 8b) Page 2
Subject: Resolution Approving 2012-2013 IUOE Local #49 Labor Agreement
• 2012: An additional $100 was provided to our Equipment Mechanics for tool allowance
to ensure they have the tools needed to do their work. (Equipment Mechanics use their
own tools at work. With changes to vehicle models and wear and tear on tools, the
allowance was increased from $500 to $600 per calendar year.)
• 2012: Removed $330 annual clothing allowance for union members effective March
2012, and the City will instead provide required uniforms.
• Added language allowing seasonal and temporary employees who work performing
maintenance duties at the Nature Center be exempt from the 120 work day limitation.
(This allows us more flexibility and time for seasonal staff to assist with tree and trail
maintenance, etc., at this facility.)
Staff is pleased with this agreement and recommends approval. The proposed contract is on file
with the City Clerk. More detail is available upon request.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION:
Funds for this settlement are included in the 2012 budget and will be programmed into 2013
planning for budgets.
VISION CONSIDERATION:
Not directly applicable.
Attachment: Resolution
Prepared by: Ali Fosse, HR Coordinator
Reviewed by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of February 21, 2012 (Item No. 8b) Page 3
Subject: Resolution Approving 2012-2013 IUOE Local #49 Labor Agreement
RESOLUTION NO. 12-____
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE LABOR AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK
AND
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS,
LOCAL #49
JANUARY 1, 2012 – DECEMBER 31, 2013
WHEREAS, the City and the Union have reached a negotiated settlement covering the
terms and conditions of a Labor Agreement as permitted by the State of Minnesota Public
Employees Labor Relations Act, and
WHEREAS, the City Council may enter into such agreements as authorized by its
Charter;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis
Park that the Mayor and City Manager are authorized to execute a Collective Bargaining
Agreement, City Contract #______ between the City of St. Louis Park and International Union
of Operating Engineers (IUOE), Local #49, effective January 1, 2012 – December 31, 2013.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council February 21, 2012
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk