HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013/10/21 - ADMIN - Agenda Packets - City Council - Regular
AGENDA
OCTOBER 21, 2013
7:15 p.m. SPECIAL STUDY SESSION – Council Chambers
Discussion Items
1. 7:15 p.m. Property Acquisition Update: 4601 Highway 7
7:30 p.m. CITY COUNCIL MEETING – Council Chambers
1. Call to Order
1a. Pledge of Allegiance
1b. Roll Call
2. Presentations -- None
3. Approval of Minutes
3a. Study Session Minutes September 23, 2013
3b. Special Study Session Minutes October 7, 2013
3c. City Council Meeting Minutes October 7, 2013
4. Approval of Agenda and Items on Consent Calendar
NOTE: The Consent Calendar lists those items of business which are considered to be routine and/or which
need no discussion. Consent items are acted upon by one motion. If discussion is desired by either a
Councilmember or a member of the audience, that item may be moved to an appropriate section of the regular
agenda for discussion. The items for the Consent Calendar are listed on the last page of the Agenda.
Recommended Action: Motion to approve the Agenda as presented and items listed on the Consent Calendar; and to waive
reading of all resolutions and ordinances. (Alternatively: Motion to add or remove items from the agenda,
or move items from Consent Calendar to regular agenda for discussion.)
5. Boards and Commissions -- None
6. Public Hearings
6a. Assessment of Delinquent Charges
Recommended Action: Mayor to open the public hearing, solicit comments, and close
the public hearing. Motion to Adopt Resolution to assess delinquent water, sewer,
storm water, refuse, abating grass/weed cutting, tree removal/injection, false alarm fees
and other miscellaneous charges.
7. Requests, Petitions, and Communications from the Public -- None
8. Resolutions, Ordinances, Motions and Discussion Items
8a. Adoption of 2014 Utility Rates
Recommended Action: Motion to Adopt Resolution setting the 2014 Utility Rates.
8b. Resolution Confirming Appointment of Stephen Koering to the Position of Fire Chief
Recommended Action: Motion to Adopt Resolution confirming the appointment of
Stephen Koering to the position of Fire Chief.
9. Communication
Meeting of October 21, 2013
City Council Agenda
CONSENT CALENDAR
4a. Approve Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance establishing fees for 2014 as outlined
in Appendix A of the City Code of Ordinances; and to approve the summary
ordinance for publication
4b. Approve premises amendment to the on-sale intoxicating and Sunday sales liquor
license for Apple Minnesota, LLC, dba Applebee’s Neighborhood Grill and Bar,
relocating to 8312 State Highway 7 in St. Louis Park
4c. Adopt Resolution Confirming Continued Water Main and Sewer Backup Coverage
4d. Approve Amendment No. 3 in the amount of $73,500 to Contract 13-12, originally in
the amount of $162,500, with Summit Envirosolutions, Inc. for consultant services
related to the implementation of the Reilly Tar and Chemical Corporation Remedial
Action Plan during 2013
4e.
Approve Contract with Three Rivers Park District to clear and remove snow from the
LRT and Cedar Lake Extension Trails through the City of St. Louis Park for the 2013-
2014 Winter Season
4f. Approve second reading and Adopt Ordinance amending Chapter 36 of the City Code
pertaining to definitions; processing comprehensive plan amendments and planning
applications concurrently; fence height in the front yard; front yard setbacks in
commercial zoning districts; compact parking dimensions; and allowing outdoor
seating with food and beverage service in the Business Park zoning district, and to
approve the summary ordinance for publication
4g. Approve Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance amending the Official Zoning Map to
change the zoning of 3998 Wooddale Avenue and 4017 Utica Avenue from R-2
Single-Family Residence to R-4 Multiple-Family Residence, and approve the
summary ordinance contained in the agenda materials for publication
4h. Adopt Resolution authorizing the special assessment for the repair of the sewer
service line at 7325 Minnetonka Boulevard, St. Louis Park, MN P.I.D. 17-117-21-21-
0030
4i. Adopt Resolution authorizing the special assessment for the repair of the sewer
service line at 3204 Hampshire Avenue South, St. Louis Park, MN P.I.D. 17-117-21-
13-0002
4j. Adopt Resolution authorizing the special assessment for the repair of the sewer
service line at 7705 13th Lane, St. Louis Park, MN P.I.D. 05-117-21- 32-0055
4k. Adopt Resolution authorizing the special assessment for the repair of the water
service line at 1340 Jordan Avenue South, St. Louis Park, MN P.I.D. 01-117-22-41-
0009
4l. Adopt Resolution authorizing the special assessment for the repair of the water service
line at 2500 Xylon Avenue South, St. Louis Park, MN P.I.D. 07-117-21-42-0031
4m. Approve entering into a service agreement with the Hennepin County Department of
Corrections for continuing to use their crews from the Sentencing to Service Program
(STS Program)
Meeting of October 21, 2013
City Council Agenda
4n.
Adopt Resolution authorizing final payment in the amount of $15,846.74 for the 2013
Sealcoat Project with Allied Blacktop Company- Project No. 2013-0001, City
Contract No. 33-13
4o. Approve for filing Environment & Sustainability Commission: Sustainable SLP
Meeting Minutes August 7, 2013
4p. Approve for filing Environment & Sustainability Commission: Sustainable SLP
Meeting Minutes September 11, 2013
4q. Approve for filing Vendor Claims
St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority and regular City Council meetings are carried live on Civic TV cable channel 17 and
replays are frequent; check www.parktv.org for the schedule. The meetings are also streamed live on the internet at www.parktv.org, and
saved for Video on Demand replays. The agenda is posted on Fridays on the official city bulletin board in the lobby of City Hall and on
the text display on Civic TV cable channel 17. The agenda and full packet are available by noon on Friday on the city’s website.
Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. To make arrangements, please call
the Administration Department at 952/924-2525 (TDD 952/924-2518) at least 96 hours in advance of meeting.
Meeting: Special Study Session
Meeting Date: October 21, 2013
Action Agenda Item: 1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Property Acquisition Update: 4601 Highway 7
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Provide staff with feedback as to whether the EDA wishes to proceed with the acquisition of
4601 Highway 7.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the EDA wish to proceed with purchasing the subject
property?
SUMMARY: On August 5th, the EDA approved a Purchase Agreement to acquire 4601
Highway 7. At that meeting, Staff indicated that it would consult with the EDA near the end of
the 90 day Due Diligence Period regarding the results of the Phase II Environmental Site
Assessment (ESA) and the likely relocation settlement amounts to determine if the EDA wished
to proceed with the property acquisition.
The Phase II ESA revealed that portions of the subject site were previously filled with concrete,
asphalt and wood debris. The filling apparently occurred in an area that was historically a
wetland and is not unusual for sites in proximity to the Bass Lake area. The primary
contaminants of concern in the soil on the property are Petroleum hydrocarbons, trichloroethene
(TCE) and mercury. Some of the contaminants could remain on site or would be required to be
properly disposed offsite depending on the future reuse of the property. The approximately 9,000
yards of soil/debris that would likely be required to be removed from the site are not enough to
preclude redevelopment from occurring on the site. As with the former Reynolds Welding
property acquisition, the MPCA will likely allow the site to remain essentially as is (no
remediation required) after building abatement and demolition but will require that the identified
contaminants be formally addressed when redevelopment plans for the property are determined.
Assuming all contingencies within the Purchase Agreement can be satisfied, the property would
be into the MPCA’s VIC Program and closing would occur within the next several weeks. Upon
closing, Staff would seek to have the building secured for the winter and removed next spring.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: It is proposed that the EDA purchase the
property located at 4601 Highway 7 for $2.25 million. The EDA would incur additional costs
related to business relocation estimated at less than $8,000 and building demolition estimated at
approximately $109,000 as well as temporary property management. The cost of acquisition and
related expenses would be derived from the Development Fund with the intent to recoup the
EDA’s investment from the future sale or leasing of the property. Grant and/or TIF funds would
be sought to address the remaining $350,000 in estimated soil/fill excavation and disposal costs.
VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged
community.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Background
Prepared by: Greg Hunt, Economic Development Coordinator
Reviewed by: Kevin Locke, Community Development Director
Approved by: Nancy Deno, EDA Deputy Executive Director/Deputy City Manager
Special Study Session Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 1) Page 2
Title: Property Acquisition Update: 4601 Highway 7
BACKGROUND
On August 5th the EDA approved the Purchase Agreement to acquire the former Professional
Instruments Company property located at 4601 Highway 7 and 3130 Monterey Avenue South
(“subject property”). The subject property fronts on the south side of CSAH 25 just east of Belt
Line Blvd. The property consists of two parcels which total 3.16 acres. It lies immediately
northeast of the proposed Belt Line SWLRT station platform. The site was developed in 1946
with a 12,000- square foot, slab-on-grade, office and manufacturing facility which also includes
a partial basement. There is also a six-stall garage, two gazebos, and four small sheds on the
south half of the property.
EDA ownership of this parcel will provide the City control of the future use of the property and
ensure that it is used to the maximum benefit of the community and the future SWLRT line. The
property is actively being marketed and numerous parties have expressed interest in the
property. Based upon the tenor of some of these inquires, the property could end up being
purchased by an entity that may not make optimal use of this key property near the future LRT
station. EDA ownership will ensure that the future reuse of the property is consistent with the
City and Met Council station area plans.
Special Study Session Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 1) Page 3
Title: Property Acquisition Update: 4601 Highway 7
Acquisition and clearance of this site will also improve the image and appearance of the CSAH
25/Highway 7 corridor. Consistent with the Comprehensive Plan the EDA has actively
encouraged redevelopment in this corridor for some time. Acquiring, clearing and preparing the
subject property for redevelopment is a logical next step in that process.
Environmental Conditions
Staff believed it prudent to conduct a Phase I and Phase II Environment Site Assessment (ESA)
to determine the presence of any contaminants that may be present on the subject property. One
of the contingencies within the proposed Purchase Agreement is that the results of such
environmental investigations must be acceptable to the EDA. The EDA retained Braun Intertec
to conduct both studies as well as an asbestos survey within the building. The findings of
Braun’s Phase II ESA are as follows:
Building Conditions
• Asbestos was identified as a component of certain identified building materials at
the Site.
Soil Conditions
• Soil/Fill
The Site topography suggests that the property was filled many years ago, and
based on observations at the Site the fill includes concrete, asphalt and wood
debris. The soil borings suggest that the fill was placed over a former wetland
area on a portion of the site. The fill consists of silty sand and sandy silt. Based
on the relatively few soil borings and the existing Site topography, we estimate
that there may be approximately 8,400 to 10,000 cubic yards of fill over-laying
former wetland sediments.
The building also is at least partially located on fill soils, either re-worked soil
from on Site our imported from off-site. It is likely that some or all of the fill soils
could be re-used on-Site depending on the final plans for any structures on the
Site.
• Contamination
The sampling and analysis of soil at the site shows that the fill soils are impacted
by petroleum hydrocarbons, metals (mercury) and chlorinated volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) namely Trichloroethene. The concentrations are at levels
that may require an engineered cover over some of the soils under certain
redevelopment schemes or, if exported, would require proper treatment or
disposal.
Special Study Session Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 1) Page 4
Title: Property Acquisition Update: 4601 Highway 7
• Soil Vapor
Soil vapor samples collected beneath the main building on Site show that there
are chlorinated volatile organic compounds in soil vapor beneath the building.
These results suggest that the soils beneath the building have had a release of
Trichloroethene (TCE) and 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene. If these soils were to be re-
used at the Site and these same vapor concentrations were still evident,
engineered controls for the vapors may be necessary.
Groundwater
• Occurrence
Groundwater was encountered at a depth below ground surface of approximately
7-13 feet. It appears that groundwater is flowing generally to the south.
• Contamination
The groundwater was sampled and the analysis shows that low levels of
petroleum (as defined by diesel range organics DRO) are present Site wide;
additionally TCE impacts were detected in groundwater in the northern portion of
the Site. Generally these levels of impacts will not require remedial action.
The ESA determined that there are soil, soil vapor and groundwater impacts on the property by a
number of compounds and elements. These materials will require regulated management.
Finding hazardous substances, petroleum products and fill materials on the subject property is
not unusual as numerous sites in the Bass Lake wetland area were found to be impacted with
contaminated fill. The approximately 9,000 yards of soil/debris that may be required to be
removed from the property are not sufficient to preclude redevelopment from occurring on the
site. It should be noted that some of the contaminants, when properly managed, could remain on
site depending on the future reuse of the property.
As with other impacted properties the EDA has acquired, the EDA would enter the subject
property into the MPCA’s Voluntary Investigation and Clean-up Program (VIC) in order to
obtain a No Association Determination. The VIC application will result in a letter requesting that
the EDA provide a response action plan (RAP) for addressing the known contamination, which
will then lead to a No Further Action (NFA) Letter for the identified releases. These filings will
separate the EDA from any responsibility for the environmental conditions present on the site.
Applying to the VIC program also provides liability protection to the EDA statutorily available
under the State of Minnesota Land Recycling Act. As with the former Reynolds Welding
property acquisition, the MPCA will likely allow the site to remain essentially as is (no
remediation required) after building abatement and demolition. When the redevelopment plans
for the property are determined, a specific corrective action plan will need to be submitted to the
MPCA which outlines how the impacts on the property will be addressed.
Special Study Session Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 1) Page 5
Title: Property Acquisition Update: 4601 Highway 7
Short and Long Term Property Remediation Costs
The building on the subject property is in poor condition and has an adverse visual impact from
both the neighborhood to the north and CSAH 25. Consistent with the acquisition of the former
American Inn and Reynolds properties, it is recommended that upon acquisition, the building be
secured for the winter and removed next spring. The site would then be maintained but the
underlying soil conditions would not be addressed until the property’s future use is definitively
determined. There are both short and long term costs associated with the remedial actions
proposed to be taken on the subject property.
The short term costs (which includes restricted waste removal, building demolition, and
regulatory submissions) is estimated at approximately $109,000.
Redevelopment of the property will require a certain amount of site work, including soil
excavation, grading and related work. In order to plan for the subsequent redevelopment of the
property, Braun prepared the following budget level cost estimates for the long term remedial
actions that will likely be required for the site.
Estimated Long Term Site Remediation Costs
Response Action Plan for Soils $5,000
Clearing and Grubbing $10,000
Site Grading $30,000
Soil/Fill Excavation and Disposal
Additional Investigation $30,000
RAP Addendum $5,000
Excavation/Load/Haul/Dispose $270,000
Total Cost $350,000
These costs are based on a number of assumptions and the limited
data that we have from the Site survey and the Phase II
Environmental Site Assessment findings. We have solicited costs for
the major items above but not on a competitive basis. We have also
assumed that approximately 9,000 yards of soil/debris will be
subsequently removed for Site development (excavated/loaded/hauled
and disposed at a sub-title D landfill in MN) and that those soils will
be regulated but not hazardous. This volume is based on the soil
boring findings and the Site topography. Braun assumed that
additional Site investigation will be required but will not change
significantly the findings of contamination at the Site.
The cost of the above long term remedial actions would be addressed in conjunction with the
future redevelopment of the property.
Relocation Costs Associated with Property Tenants
As noted in the August 5th staff report, there were two leases in effect on the subject property.
One was with Professional Instrument Company, Inc. which rented the building. It is owned by
members of the Seller’s family. The other lease was with Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. which
rented a small portion of the subject property for the use of two billboards facing the CSAH
Special Study Session Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 1) Page 6
Title: Property Acquisition Update: 4601 Highway 7
25/Belt Line intersection. Both leases were on a month-to-month basis and were recently
terminated.
The EDA, as the buyer and a public entity, is subject to the federal Uniform Relocation Act
despite the fact that the Purchase Agreement is being entered into by willing parties and is an
arms-length transaction. As a result, Evergreen Land Services was retained to determine the
EDA’s financial exposure to relocation claims from both tenants. Since the principals that
constitute Professional Instrument Company are members of the same family selling the
property, and since the sale price of the property is sufficient compensation and since the
company was already in the process of vacating the property, Professional Instrument Company
agreed to sign a waiver of relocation benefits. As for the billboards, the Seller recently
terminated its lease with Clear Channel as the Seller did not wish the billboards to encumber the
sale of the property regardless of the buyer. At the Seller’s request, Clear Channel recently
removed the billboards. According to the federal law, Clear Channel is entitled to the cost of
dismantling and moving the billboard structures from the property or their depreciated value in
place, whichever is less. Prior to their removal, the EDA obtained an appraisal of the billboard
structure. The depreciated Fair Market Value of the two billboards in place was determined to be
$7,720. Evergreen has shared this value with Clear Channel and has informed Clear Channel that
that is the amount the EDA would provide in relocation compensation under the law should the
EDA close on the property.
Purchase Agreement Summary
A Purchase Agreement between the property owner, 4601 Highway 7, LLC, and the EDA has
been executed by both parties. The terms of the Agreement were summarized in the June 21st
staff report. The purchase price is $2,250,000. Based upon comparable land sales information,
the acquisition price of the subject property is reasonable and within market. According to the
City Assessor, the acquisition price of the subject property is considered reasonable and well
within market. The property’s value lies in its prominent location east of Highway 100, visibility
along CSAH 25 and proximity to the future Belt Line SWLRT station as well as the difficulty of
assembling more than 3 acres in St. Louis Park.
How would the property acquisition and ancillary costs be funded?
Purchase of the subject property as well as the demolition and relocation costs noted above
would be derived from the Development Fund with the intent to recoup the EDA’s investment
from the future sale, leasing, or redevelopment of the property. The EDA would incur additional
costs related to temporary property management. Grant and/or TIF funds would be sought to
address the remaining soil/fill excavation and disposal costs associated with the future
redevelopment of the property.
Next Steps
If the EDA wishes to proceed with the acquisition of the subject property and all contingencies
within the Purchase Agreement can be satisfied, the property would be entered into the MPCA’s
VIC Program and closing would occur within the next several weeks. Upon closing, staff would
seek to have the building secured for the winter and removed next spring.
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: October 21, 2013
Minutes: 3a
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
SEPTEMBER 23, 2013
The meeting convened at 6:40 p.m.
Councilmembers present: Mayor Pro Tem Susan Sanger, Steve Hallfin, Anne Mavity, Julia
Ross, Sue Santa, and Jake Spano.
Councilmembers absent: Mayor Jeff Jacobs.
Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), Westwood Hills Nature Center Manager (Mr.
Oestreich), Director of Engineering (Ms. Heiser), and Recording Secretary (Ms. Hughes).
2. Update on Nature Center Improvements (Verbal) – Mark Oestreich
Mr. Oestreich took Council on a brief tour of the Nature Center and pointed out some of the
recent projects completed. He advised that there are thirteen cameras in the park and two
cameras have software that counts visitors. He distributed 2012 attendance statistics showing
over 30,000 people visited the center last year and noted the Junior Naturalists contributed over
2,100 volunteer hours during the summer months. He stated one of the questions being
considered by staff relates to increased visibility for the Nature Center, including whether to put
signs for the Nature Center on 394 and/or 169, which would likely increase the number of
resident and non-resident visitors. He indicated the Nature Center is a local center with limited
capacity and while it would be great to have more visitors to the center, he felt it would be
important to have a plan in place for increased visitors and to address the Nature Center’s
capacities.
Councilmember Santa agreed it would be important to find out the capacities of the center and to
make sure the Nature Center is not overwhelmed by visitors, adding it would be important to
also understand the impact on the vegetation, bees, and animals in the Nature Center.
Mr. Oestreich also distributed plans for the observation deck that will be done by Tree Trust. He
advised that projects completed this year include the “Y” dock and improvements to the brick
house; in addition, Tree Trust rebuilt a 250 foot boardwalk this summer and another kiosk by the
picnic building is in the process of being installed. He reported the Nature Center received a
grant from the Minnesota Park and Recreation Association to create a geocache trail and this
grant provides the ability to create signage on the posts, including QR Codes. He added that they
are looking into replacing the entrance sign in 2014.
Councilmember Ross requested further information about the cameras using facial recognition.
Mr. Oestreich explained that all information goes to the server and is recorded for a specific
period of time, adding the cameras are used primarily for security purposes.
Councilmember Ross questioned whether this software could be used in the park shelter
restrooms based on Council’s earlier discussions about keeping the restrooms open, adding this
might be something the City could use without having to invest new money.
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 3a) Page 2
Title: Study Session Minutes of September 23, 2013
Mayor Pro Tem Sanger indicated that Mayor Jacobs had previously suggested using this site as a
demonstration area to show people how solar panels or other energy saving devices work.
Mr. Oestreich stated that solar panels would not work given the Nature Center’s tree canopy. He
added that the picnic area has been converted to LED lighting and the energy bill has dropped in
half. He reported that the Nature Center is adding a natural gas powered generator this month
that will provide power to the Nature Center buildings, parking lot, and the gate. He stated that
the Nature Center now has its own Facebook page which has become very popular and the
Nature Center also has its own website and web camera so people can tune in and watch what is
happening at the Nature Center.
Councilmember Ross asked if the Nature Center staff provide any type of education about
wildlife management.
Mr. Oestreich replied that Nature Center staff field a lot of calls about wildlife management and
felt the Nature Center’s website could be enhanced to include this type of information. He also
distributed information about the Halloween party on October 18th and 19th.
Mayor Pro Tem Sanger thanked Mr. Oestreich for the update.
1. Future Study Session Agenda Planning – October 7 & October 14, 2013
Mr. Harmening presented the proposed special study session agenda for October 7th and the
proposed study session agenda for October 14th.
Councilmember Mavity stated that she has discussed the 4601 Highway 7 property with staff and
wanted to disclose that her husband helped create Land Bank. She indicated the possibility of
Land Bank as an option to purchase selected land along these corridors. She urged the City to
explore this, especially at Louisiana Avenue where there may be sites to acquire as part of the
station area planning.
Councilmember Ross felt that Council needs to have a broader discussion regarding housing and
what Council wants the community to look like in five or ten years. She stated the City is getting
more and more requests for apartments and Council should discuss whether it wants to place a
moratorium on future apartment structures, coupled with a discussion on affordable housing.
Councilmember Spano stated the cover story on the most recent edition of Twin Cities Business
Monthly was about luxury apartments and whether the metro area has reached a tipping point.
He agreed to send the article to Council.
Mayor Pro Tem Sanger agreed that Council needs to have a discussion regarding its housing
goals and whether to place a moratorium on apartment buildings.
Councilmember Mavity stated that the market is very segmented with some locations saturated
but was opposed to a moratorium.
Councilmember Ross stated she would support a moratorium until Council can have a discussion
on this, e.g., a moratorium on new apartment projects for the next six months until Council can
discuss the issue and make some decisions.
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 3a) Page 3
Title: Study Session Minutes of September 23, 2013
Councilmember Spano felt that Council should have a discussion about its tolerance levels first
before making any decisions.
Councilmember Santa agreed.
Mr. Harmening suggested that this issue be discussed at Council’s retreat in early 2014.
3. Communications/Updates (Verbal)
Mr. Harmening advised that the top two candidates for Fire Chief are going through the final
leadership assessment. He anticipates making a decision in the near future and bringing the
matter to Council for confirmation.
Councilmember Santa stated she has been asked numerous times about the Met Council’s
timetable for making a decision on light rail and the reroute.
Councilmember Spano stated the CMC will make its recommendation to the Met Council on
October 2nd and the Met Council is scheduled to make its decision on October 9th.
Council discussed the reroute and the potential for a reroute outside of the metro area. Council
also discussed the potential CP swap as well as mitigation.
Mr. Harmening stated that he and the Edina City Manager met with the City of Minneapolis
approximately a year ago regarding a parcel at 40th and France that is owned by the City of
Minneapolis. He indicated that the City of Minneapolis recently asked if the City was interested
in buying the parcel. He stated that after a meeting with Minneapolis officials, this matter will
be brought back to Council.
Mayor Pro Tem Sanger stated she has been getting some pushback from residents about the 90-
gallon recycling carts and some residents have said they have no place to store the 90-gallon cart
and are concerned about getting a citation for leaving the cart outside.
Mr. Harmening stated the City is asking residents to try the 90-gallon carts for 90 days before
switching to a smaller cart.
The meeting adjourned at 8:52 p.m.
Written Reports provided and documented for recording purposes only:
4. 2014 - 2017 Renewal of Auditor Contract with HLB Tautges Redpath, LTD
5. August 2013 Monthly Financial Report
______________________________________ ______________________________________
Nancy Stroth, City Clerk Susan Sanger, Mayor Pro Tem
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: October 21, 2013
Minutes: 3b
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL STUDY SESSION
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
OCTOBER 7, 2013
The meeting convened at 6:30 p.m.
Councilmembers present: Mayor Pro Tem Susan Sanger, Steve Hallfin, Anne Mavity, Julia
Ross, Sue Santa, and Jake Spano.
Councilmembers absent: Mayor Jeff Jacobs.
Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), Director of Engineering (Ms. Heiser), Senior
Engineering Project Manager (Mr. Sullivan), Operations Superintendent (Mr. Hanson), and
Recording Secretary (Ms. Hughes).
1. Ownership and Replacement Costs in Right of Way
Mr. Sullivan presented the staff report and reviewed the draft policy statement, stating that this
policy statement is consistent with other communities, including Edina and Minnetonka, that
indicates anything that a resident puts in the right of way would be at the resident’s onus to
replace if damaged or to relocate if a City project was coming through. He advised that staff has
determined that Chapter 24 of the City Code is vague and needs to be updated, adding that the
League has a useful outline to follow as a way to better describe ownership and uses allowed in
the right of way, etc.
Councilmember Santa stated there were sidewalks installed during the last round of the City’s
program that required retaining walls to be installed on private property because of the
topography and asked who is responsible for the upkeep of these retaining walls.
Mr. Sullivan replied the City’s opinion has always been that if a sidewalk or roadway gets
installed and the retaining wall was necessary to construct that sidewalk or roadway, then the
City is responsible for the retaining wall. He added the City will always look for ways to
manage a particular yard based on what is best for the resident and the City as well as the lowest
long-term cost, and if sloping back is impossible, then a retaining wall gets installed. He noted if
the retaining wall fits within the right of way the City will install it there and if the property
owner desires a retaining wall then the City would talk with the property owner about putting the
retaining wall on their property and have an agreement in place with the property owner
requiring them to perform long term maintenance on the retaining wall.
Councilmember Santa indicated there were a few locations where the retaining wall installed by
the City was partially located in the right of way and partially located on private property and
asked if the City was responsible for maintaining the retaining walls in those cases.
Mr. Sullivan replied in the affirmative.
Councilmember Santa stated it would be important for the City to make sure there is
documentation about ownership and responsibility of these items to avoid any misunderstandings
in the future, particularly when a property is sold.
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 3b) Page 2
Title: Special Study Session Minutes of October 7, 2013
Councilmember Ross agreed and asked if there is any language either in the permit or in the
County documents that indicates items are located in the right of way and that it is the property
owner’s responsibility to make sure when the property is sold that the new owners are aware of
this.
Councilmember Hallfin asked if the City’s permit allowing property owners to do work in the
right of way contains language indicating the City provided the property owner with permission
to install improvements in the right of way and whether that permission is granted in perpetuity
or if the permit indicates the City can come back and reclaim some portion of the land.
Mr. Harmening stated the City has issued some encroachment agreements where the City
allowed retaining walls and other decorative items to be placed in the right of way and the
document indicates that a property owner is doing so at their own risk.
Ms. Heiser agreed that the language in the right of way permit needs to be clearer.
Councilmember Mavity felt the proposed policy made sense if the City were starting with a
blank canvas, but the challenge is that there have been inconsistent messages provided to
residents by the City as well as inconsistent understandings among residents about this issue.
She also felt there was an equity issue and gave an example of the significant row of hedges on
the corner of 39th and France that are located a very short distance from the street and the
pending installation of a sidewalk in this area will require the property owner to tear down the
row of hedges and redo their landscaping at their own expense. She stated this is the problem
with retroactive application of this kind of policy and felt the City should figure this out before
completing the Connect the Park plan, adding she felt the City needs to evaluate the cost for
residents to replace their landscaping as part of this plan even though the City might not pay all
of that cost, particularly in locations where the City is not yet sure where a sidewalk is going to
be installed.
Councilmember Spano questioned the practical application of Councilmember Mavity’s
comments and felt this could lead to staff getting embroiled in neighbor-to-neighbor disputes.
He agreed the City needs greater clarity on this policy and the goal should be to have the City’s
documentation clearly state that the City reserves the right to require a property owner to remove
anything in the right of way for public improvement projects and any exceptions to the policy
should be handled on a case by case basis, adding he was concerned that handling these
exceptions could become rather cumbersome and expensive.
Mayor Pro Tem Sanger felt that Council should first agree on some basic principles that can
provide the basis for determining what needs to be changed in the City’s current practices. She
indicated the question is not just who is responsible when an individual property owner puts
things in the right of way but also includes the question of what the City’s responsibility is in
these situations. She suggested several principles for Council consideration, including the
principle that private property owners must inform the City in advance of any private items on
public property that they are installing, as well as the principle that the City is responsible for all
construction and maintenance of items in, under, or on the right of way that the City has decided
should be there, unless it is something for the specific use of the property owner, e.g., the
sanitary sewer line. She stated another principle might be that the property owner is responsible
for all items in or on the right of way that they placed there and must remove these items when
necessary for maintenance or construction as well as the principle that the City has to provide
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 3b) Page 3
Title: Special Study Session Minutes of October 7, 2013
advance notice to property owners if the City wants them to remove their items and whether they
can replace these items later if desired; in addition, the City should have one point of
communication for residents. She added the City maintains survey information on private
properties in the City and suggested that the City publicize that these surveys are available for
residents.
Mr. Harmening noted the City has survey data if a property owner requested a building permit
but the City does not have survey information for all properties in the City.
Councilmember Ross questioned at what point the City puts the onus back on homeowners as it
relates to the right of way, adding this is urban living where there are public right of ways.
Councilmember Mavity stated that residents have historically been given inconsistent guidance
on this issue and felt that if the City has contributed to that confusion, then the City is
accountable in some way. She urged the City to consider this when determining the cost of
putting in new sidewalks and suggested providing some assistance to residents who can
substantiate that they received inconsistent guidance from the City.
Mr. Harmening stated the City could consider budgeting a stipend with a dollar limit to assist
homeowners with replacing their landscaping during a public improvement project.
Mayor Pro Tem Sanger requested the City consider other ways of sending notifications to
residents as it relates to these types of public improvement projects.
Councilmember Mavity agreed and suggested using phone alerts.
Ms. Heiser agreed to follow up on this.
Councilmember Spano stated one of the roles of the neighborhood block captains and
neighborhood association presidents is to engage their community in civic affairs and suggested
the City come up with a way to support these groups in engaging their neighborhoods. He added
he wants the City to be crystal clear about what it is telling residents as it relates to this policy so
that there is no confusion.
It was the consensus of the City Council that property owners are responsible for the repair and
maintenance of any fencing, irrigation systems, and pet containment systems placed in the right
of way. It was also the consensus of the City Council to direct staff to further research the
possibility of providing residents with a stipend to replace landscaping impacted by public
improvement projects.
The meeting adjourned at 7:27 p.m.
______________________________________ ______________________________________
Nancy Stroth, City Clerk Susan Sanger, Mayor Pro Tem
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: October 21, 2013
Minutes: 3c
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
OCTOBER 7, 2013
1. Call to Order
Mayor Pro Tem Sanger called the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m.
Councilmembers present: Mayor Pro Tem Susan Sanger, Steve Hallfin, Anne Mavity, Julia
Ross, Sue Santa, and Jake Spano.
Councilmembers absent: Mayor Jeff Jacobs.
Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), City Attorney (Mr. Scott), City Clerk (Ms.
Stroth), Police Chief (Mr. Luse), Police Lieutenant (Ms. Dreier), Chief Information Officer (Mr.
Pires), Director of Community Development (Mr. Locke), Director of Engineering (Ms. Heiser),
Senior Planner (Mr. Walther), Planning/Zoning Supervisor (Ms. McMonigal), Senior
Engineering Project Manager (Mr. Sullivan), Assistant Zoning Administrator (Mr. Morrison),
Associate Planner (Mr. Kelley), Public Works Services Manager (Mr. Merkley), and Recording
Secretary (Ms. Hughes).
Guests: Hennepin County Attorney (Mr. Freeman) and St. Louis Park Superintendent of Schools
(Mr. Metz).
1a. Pledge of Allegiance
1b. Roll Call
2. Presentations
2a. Mike Freeman Presentation – Criminal Stats & Safe Communities
Mr. Freeman thanked the City for the opportunity to speak and thanked the St. Louis Park
Police Department and Chief Luse for their efforts. He advised that the violent crime rate
has decreased from 188 in 2007 to 94; in addition, the rates for robbery and assault with a
deadly weapon have decreased by more than half. He credited the drop in crime to the
Hennepin County Attorney’s work with its partners in law enforcement, as well as
neighborhood organizations and nonprofits. He stated the County Attorney’s Office
works hard on diversion and crime prevention and discussed the “Be at School” program,
which is one of the leading programs in the country to make sure kids go to school with
90% of the kids in the program having no unexcused absences. He also expressed thanks
to the City Council.
Councilmember Mavity requested comment regarding the recent increase in violence
against women, particularly from a prosecutorial perspective.
Mr. Freeman stated the County Attorney’s Office has become more aggressive in
charging domestic abuse crimes. He indicated a lot of the male offenders have seen a lot
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 3c) Page 2
Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of October 7, 2013
of violence in their family and do not have a positive role model and felt there needs to be
more one on one conversations with these young men.
Mayor Pro Tem Sanger thanked Mr. Freeman for his presentation.
2b. Presentation by Rob Metz, St. Louis Park Superintendent of Schools
Mr. Metz presented information regarding the St. Louis Park Public Schools brand and
stated the School District has more people wanting to come to St. Louis Park schools than
there are seats available. He stated the referendum on November 5, 2013, will include
three separate and independent questions with the first question related to the technology
levy of $17.5 million over ten years, which is a renewal of the existing technology levy
and will be used to make sure the schools have the most up to date technological teaching
tools. He pointed out that the School District is asking to revoke the technology levy one
year early and extend it for ten more years. He explained that the second referendum
question relates to a $14.9 million bond issue over nine years to be used only for building
additions to Aquila, Peter Hobart, and Susan Lindgren Elementary Schools and for
general upkeep of buildings. He explained that the reason Cedar Manor is not being
reopened is because it would cost $500,000-$750,000 per year to operate the school and
the School District would not be adding any students and the fund balance would go
down, so operating one less school saves the School District a lot of money. He stated
the building additions would reduce crowding and leave more open seats to bring in more
students. He stated the third referendum question would provide $1.1 million annually
for general operating money to maintain academic quality and competitive advantage.
He stated if the three referendum questions are passed, the tax impact is $82 annually or
$6.83 per month on an average home valued at $200,000. He added the School District is
refinancing some of its old debt this fall and taxes would go down about $15 per year on
a $200,000 home so the tax impact of the referendum would be lessened.
Councilmember Ross stated that Council continues to push continued growth in the City
and bringing in families and asked if the School District will be able to handle increased
capacity.
Mr. Metz replied that the current configuration is fairly tight and the School District’s
biggest class is 1st grade. He advised the School District has some wiggle room with
open enrollment and can say yes or no to open enrollment students, adding that on July 1,
2013, the School District closed open enrollment.
Councilmember Spano requested further information about the “revoke and approve”
language on the first referendum question.
Mr. Metz stated the School District is getting the most pressure as it relates to space
issues and the School District knew it had to go out for a referendum on that issue. He
stated the School District made the decision to add the technology levy one year early so
that it would not have to go out for referendum two years in a row. He explained that if
someone votes yes on Question #1, they are agreeing to revoke the current technology
levy and approving a new levy for ten more years.
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 3c) Page 3
Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of October 7, 2013
Councilmember Hallfin stated he hoped the community understood how important it was
to continue to fund the schools and that residents voted yes on all three-levy questions.
Mayor Pro Tem Sanger thanked Mr. Metz for his presentation.
3. Approval of Minutes
3a. Study Session Minutes September 9, 2013
Councilmember Mavity requested that the second sentence of the third full paragraph on
page 4 be revised to state “She questioned the utility of the numbers contained in the staff
report given the deer population in Minneapolis and Golden Valley culling the deer
because there are no fences between Golden Valley and Minneapolis.”
The minutes were approved as amended.
3b. City Council Meeting Minutes September 16, 2013
Councilmember Mavity requested that the third full paragraph on page 7 be revised to
state “Mr. Morrison replied that if this property had a 5’ setback on Excelsior Boulevard
the matter would not be before the City Council if the property were properly oriented to
Excelsior Blvd, then the property would have a 5-foot setback from Excelsior Blvd.
Mayor Pro Tem Sanger requested that a sentence be added to the first full paragraph on
page 11 that states “She pointed out that Rouse is a large, financially successful company
and many smaller developers are required by the City to provide a letter of credit.”
The minutes were approved as amended.
3c. Special City Council Meeting September 23, 2013
The minutes were approved as presented.
4. Approval of Agenda and Items on Consent Calendar
NOTE: The Consent Calendar lists those items of business which are considered to be routine
and/or which need no discussion. Consent items are acted upon by one motion. If discussion is
desired by either a Councilmember or a member of the audience, that item may be moved to an
appropriate section of the regular agenda for discussion.
4a. Adopt Resolution No. 13-139 approving a contract with HLB Tautges Redpath, LTD
for 2014 auditing services and also to authorize the City Manager to enter into
extensions through the 2017 audit.
4b. Adopt Resolution No. 13-140 Authorizing Execution of a Renewed Lease with the
State of Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) for Webster Park.
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 3c) Page 4
Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of October 7, 2013
4c. Adopt Resolution No. 13-141 approving acceptance of a monetary donation from
Esther Knops in the amount of $827.47, Paula Pendleton in the amount of $50, and St.
Louis Park Golden Kiwanis in the amount of $100 for Westwood Hills Nature Center.
4d. Approve for filing Board of Zoning Appeals Meeting Minutes August 22, 2013.
4e. Approve for filing Vendor Claims.
4f. Approve for filing Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission Minutes April 17, 2013.
4g. Approve for filing Planning Commission Meeting Minutes June 26, 2013.
It was moved by Councilmember Santa, seconded by Councilmember Mavity, to approve
the Agenda and items listed on the Consent Calendar; and to waive reading of all
resolutions and ordinances.
The motion passed 6-0 (Mayor Jacobs absent).
5. Boards and Commissions - None
6. Public Hearings
6a. Public Hearing to Consider First Reading of 2014 Fee Ordinance
Ms. Stroth presented the staff report and proposed fee ordinance for 2014. She advised
that these fees are reviewed each year by the City based on comparisons to other cities
and to make sure the City’s costs are covered. She stated the proposed fees have been
incorporated into the proposed 2014 budget, adding that the liquor licensing and utility
fees will be presented later this year.
Mayor Pro Tem Sanger opened the public hearing. No speakers were present. Mayor
Pro Tem Sanger closed the public hearing.
It was moved by Councilmember Mavity, seconded by Councilmember Hallfin, to
approve First Reading of Ordinance Adopting Fees for Calendar Year 2014 and to set
Second Reading for October 21, 2013.
The motion passed 6-0 (Mayor Jacobs absent).
6b. Consolidated Public Hearing. Resolution Nos. 13-142, 13-143, 13-144, 13-
145, 13-146, and 13-147.
(1) 2014 Budget & Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 1.
(2) 2014 Budget & Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 2.
(3) 2014 Budget & Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 3.
(4) 2014 Budget & Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 4.
(5) 2014 Budget & Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 5.
(6) 2014 Budget & Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 6.
Mr. Merkley p resented the staff report and advised that the City sent service charge and
budget information to the Special Service District property owners and held individual
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 3c) Page 5
Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of October 7, 2013
meetings with all six Special Service Districts. He stated in all of the Special Service
Districts, the Special Service District Property Owners Boards approved the 2014 service
charges and budgets. He advised that the budget and service charges for Special Service
District No. 1 remain unchanged from 2013; the budget for Special Service District No. 2
remains the same as 2013 with a slight increase in service charges due to maintenance in
this district; the budget for Special Service District No. 3 remains unchanged with a slight
decrease in service charges from 2013; the budget for Special Service District No. 4 went
down but service charges remain the same as 2013; the budget and service charges for
Special Service District No. 5 remain the same as in 2013; and the budget for Special
Service District No. 6 remains the same and service charges went down.
Mayor Pro Tem Sanger opened the public hearing. No speakers were present. Mayor
Pro Tem Sanger closed the public hearing.
It was moved by Councilmember Hallfin, seconded by Councilmember Santa, to adopt
Resolution No. 13-142, Approving 2014 Budget and Service Charges for Special Service
District No. 1, Resolution No. 13-143, Approving 2014 Budget and Service Charges for
Special Service District No. 2, Resolution No. 13-144, Approving 2014 Budget and
Service Charges for Special Service District No. 3, Resolution No. 13-145, Approving
2014 Budget and Service Charges for Special Service District No. 4, Resolution No. 13-
146, Approving 2014 Budget and Service Charges for Special Service District No. 5, and
Resolution No. 13-147, Approving 2014 Budget and Service Charges for Special Service
District No. 6.
The motion passed 6-0 (Mayor Jacobs absent).
7. Requests, Petitions, and Communications from the Public – None
8. Resolutions, Ordinances, Motions and Discussion Items
8a. Wooddale Flats Rezoning, Preliminary & Final Plat and PUD – 4017 Utica
Ave & 3998 Wooddale Ave. Resolution Nos. 13-148 and 13-149.
Mr. Kelley presented the staff report and an aerial photograph of the subject property. He
explained that the rezoning from R2 to R4 would bring the properties into consistency
with the Comprehensive Plan land use guidance of Medium Density Residential. He
stated the proposed project consists of one two-story building at the southern end of the
site and five three-story buildings for 33 total units and a density of 15 units per acre. He
reviewed the existing and proposed zoning in the immediate area and indicated the
rezoning is driven by the specific project proposal and allows the project to meet the
goals of the Comprehensive Plan including promoting efficient land use and promoting a
pedestrian friendly environment.
He explained that the plat would combine the property into a single parcel. A subdivision
variance is needed due to the topography of the site and staff believes that the granting of
the variance is warranted due to site constraints. He reviewed the Preliminary and Final
PUD and presented the site plan as well as an elevation drawing, noting that the two-story
building is 26.5’ and the three-story building is 42.6’, adding that the existing Most Holy
Trinity building is 38’ at Wooddale Avenue. He advised that all parking is provided on
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 3c) Page 6
Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of October 7, 2013
site with 86 parking spaces and 42 bike spaces. He stated that storm water management
is challenging on the site and the applicant is proposing two storage and infiltration tanks
that meet the City’s and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District’s requirements and the
applicant proposes to fill the site so that the site is fairly level with surrounding
properties. He stated that construction traffic will not be allowed to travel south on
Toledo or Utica nor east on 40th Street; in addition, construction parking will take place
entirely on the site.
He advised that a traffic analysis was done by SRF Consulting that compared the
proposed Wooddale Flats with the latest three years of school enrollment records and
concluded that average daily trips would be slightly more with significantly fewer a.m.
peak hour trips and a similar number of p.m. peak hour trips. He noted that staff has
discussed the traffic study recommendations with Hennepin County to address general
congestion in this area. He advised the project meets all landscaping requirements and
DORA requirements and includes a pedestrian connection between Utica and Wooddale,
a dog run in the southwestern corner of the property, and five community gardens. He
pointed out this plan does not reflect a recent change to the dog run after the developer
had conversations with residents in which the developer agreed to reduce the size of the
fenced-in area from 1,113 square feet to 600 square feet. He then introduced Mr. David
Carlson of Gatehouse Properties, Ltd.
Mayor Pro Tem Sanger requested confirmation that this project will be owner-occupied
condominiums rather than rental.
Mr. David Carlson, Gatehouse Properties, Ltd., replied that this was correct.
Mayor Pro Tem Sanger asked if it was possible to clearly state in the documents that the
project is restricted to owner occupied units and will not be turned into rental units.
Mr. Scott stated it was his understanding that all documents would reflect this is a
condominium plat with individual ownership of each unit rather than one building.
Councilmember Ross stated this project would rezone a property that could be single
family into a multi-family project and asked the developer about his rationale for
rezoning to multiple family versus a single-family development.
Mr. Carlson explained that a single-family development would not be feasible especially
given the cost to raze the site and complete the storm water plan. He stated the current
market for condominiums is such that they have taken reservations on twelve of the 33
units planned for the site.
Councilmember Mavity thanked the developer for working with the neighbors on this
project. She stated concerns have been raised by residents of surrounding properties
regarding the dog run and making sure the dog run does not negatively impact them in
terms of noise and the number of people using the dog run. She also requested
information about the project’s policies regarding pets.
Mr. Carlson stated they designed the project to include an area in the corner for a dog run
that is secure and available only to residents. He indicated the dog run would have a key
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 3c) Page 7
Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of October 7, 2013
code to enter and the association byl aws state that residents cannot leave their dog
unattended. He added if a pet becomes a nuisance in the dog run, just like any pets in the
building, the bylaws require that the resident must get rid of the pet if the nuisance
continues. He added this dog run is not like a public dog park.
Councilmember Mavity asked Mr. Carlson if he was willing to move the dog run to the
western side of the property.
Mr. Carlson stated he had no objection to looking into that possibility.
Councilmember Mavity stated she would like to add a condition of approval requiring the
relocation of the dog run to the western side of the property and requiring the fenced-in
area to be 600 square feet. She also requested that the approval documents include
language that specifically requires all construction parking on site.
Councilmember Hallfin stated he was originally skeptical of this project primarily
because of significant concerns regarding traffic and requested that Council have a future
study session discussion regarding traffic studies in general so that Council has a better
understanding of these studies, adding he did not agree that this project would have
minimum impact on traffic compared to traffic impacts from the school.
Councilmember Santa requested information about the time period for construction and
whether the developer still plans to phase in construction as units are sold.
Mr. Carlson stated that twelve people have expressed enough interest in the project to
sign a reservation form and if this project is approved, they will approach them and ask
them to sign a Purchase Agreement. He added he is confident that all units would be sold
once the project gets going and they will have an accelerated schedule of construction.
Mr. Harvey Meyer approached the City Council and stated he has good feelings about
this project and he would definitely want the dog run relocated if possible because of
concerns about noise and possible impact on property values.
It was moved by Councilmember Spano, seconded by Councilmember Mavity, to approve
First Reading of Ordinance Amending the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code Changing
Boundaries of Zoning Districts from R-2 to R-4 (3998 Wooddale Avenue South/4017
Utica Avenue South) and to set Second Reading for October 21, 2013.
The motion passed 6-0 (Mayor Jacobs absent).
It was moved by Councilmember Spano, seconded by Councilmember Mavity, to adopt
Resolution No. 13-148 approving the Preliminary and Final Plat of Wooddale Flats with
Variance from Subdivision Ordinance for Reduction in Utility Easement.
The motion passed 6-0 (Mayor Jacobs absent).
It was moved by Councilmember Spano, seconded by Councilmember Mavity, to adopt
Resolution No. 13-149 approving a Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development
(PUD) Under Section 36-367 of the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code for Wooddale Flats,
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 3c) Page 8
Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of October 7, 2013
as amended to add a Section 5(e) requiring all construction parking to be on the
development site; and exploring the relocation of the dog run to the western side of the
property.
The motion passed 6-0 (Mayor Jacobs absent).
8b. The West End AUAR Update. Resolution No. 13-150.
Mr. Walther presented the staff report and explained that The West End completed an
environmental review (AUAR) during the planning phases in 2007 that included a review
of development scenarios to better understand impacts on the environment and
infrastructure and any mitigation that might be required based on those scenarios. He
stated that because The West End has not completed all phases within five years, an
update is required and the City hired Kimley-Horn to prepare the AUAR update. He then
introduced Ms. Jessica Laabs from Kimley-Horn.
Ms. Laabs explained that five alternatives were evaluated in 2007 and Kimley-Horn
reviewed changes to those scenarios to determine if additional mitigation was required.
She stated they looked at three specific areas including sanitary sewer, water use, and
traffic and the results of their analysis indicate that sanitary sewer is not anticipated to
incur additional impacts because of Novartis coming offline and Met Council’s planned
interceptor and lift station upgrades that will provide additional capacity in this area. She
advised that water use continues to be an issue in these scenarios, noting that water use
came down with Novartis leaving but water use comes in at 90% and 92% of the City’s
water system capacity, so the mitigation measures in the 2007 AUAR still apply. She
advised that their analysis found that traffic numbers for the a.m. and p.m. peaks were
within the thresholds set in 2007 and the development could still be accommodated
within those numbers.
Mr. Walther pointed out the City has gone through a comment period on the AUAR and
received letters from Mn/DOT, MPCA, and Met Council indicating no objection to the
AUAR.
Mr. Harmening stated that Council is not being asked to approve projects identified in the
AUAR, adding the AUAR is an environmental planning document intended to look at
impacts of different scenarios and Council retains all land use approvals.
Councilmember Ross stated that water use capacity has come down with Novartis and
Nestle leaving but is still above 90%. She stated the City hopes to have someone come in
and occupy those sites again and was concerned about capacity, particularly when the site
is fully developed with offices and apartments.
Mayor Pro Tem Sanger indicated that Nestle has not yet closed down and may sell that
building to another manufacturer and felt it was unfair to say that whoever buys the
property from Nestle has to bear the burden of mitigation.
Mr. Harmening stated it would be Council’s decision about whether the City needs to add
more pumping or storage capacity and Council would determine how that gets done and
who pays for it, adding that the implementation of a water access charge that is effective
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 3c) Page 9
Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of October 7, 2013
on January 1, 2014, is intended to pay for future capacity enhancements the City wants to
make.
Councilmember Ross stated she was happy to see the mitigation strategies included in the
analysis and was hopeful the City would be more forward thinking and keep a close eye
on traffic in this area.
It was moved by Councilmember Ross, seconded by Councilmember Santa, to adopt
Resolution No. 13-150 Adopting the Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR)
Update for The West End Redevelopment Project Located in the Southwest Corner of
Highway 394 and 100.
The motion passed 6-0 (Mayor Jacobs absent).
8c. Major Amendment to The West End Final PUD for Multiple-Family
Residential. Resolution No. 13-151.
Mr. Walther presented the staff report and explained the applicant proposes to redevelop
the former Chili’s site and construct a multiple family residential six-story building
consisting of 158 units. He reviewed existing conditions on the 1.6-acre site and stated
the site plan includes three access points similar to the current site and plans include
converting the shared driveway into a private street design. He stated the project
provides alternative landscaping including a private pocket park on the south side, three
amenity terraces, raised garden beds, and a water feature; in addition, the developer is
working with the Flats at West End to have a shared dog walk area. He presented a
rendering of the building and reviewed the zoning related requirements in the PUD,
stating that the proposed density is 99 units per acre compared to 112.6 units per acre for
the Flats at West End. He stated the applicant is providing more designed outdoor
recreation area on this site at 13.5% of the gross building area. The plan is also providing
more parking with 238 parking stalls, including parallel parking on the new street for
guests. He advised that trees are planned along the entire perimeter of the site as well as
over 500 perennial plantings. He presented the floor plans for each level including the
underground parking levels and noted that height of the sixth floor of the building has
been stepped back on the south side to help with visual interest and scale and mass. He
then introduced Mr. Russ Krivor from DLC Residential and Mr. David Graham from
ESG Architects.
Councilmember Ross indicated this project received a lot of positive feedback during the
neighborhood meetings with no major concerns and felt the developer worked well to
address all concerns. She stated Council has had a lot of discussion about affordable
housing and making sure the City does not have areas that are designated only for
affordable housing and asked the developer to consider incorporating affordable housing
into this development and to have units designated for handicapped or seniors.
Mr. David Graham, ESG Architects, thanked Council and City staff for working with
them on this project. He felt this site was appropriate for high density and also felt they
could continue to develop this area in the spirit of Excelsior and Grand to create a rich
public realm. He stated their research indicates that some people with a two-bedroom
unit have only one car and they feel that one parking stall per bedroom is adequate. He
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 3c) Page 10
Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of October 7, 2013
indicated they include handicapped accessible units in the project, adding there has been
a lot of interest shown in this project, and they are excited about moving forward.
It was moved by Councilmember Ross, seconded by Councilmember Santa, to adopt
Resolution No. 13-151 Amending and Restating Resolution Nos. 08-057, 08-128, 09-040,
09-064, 10-093, 11-016, and 13-123 Relating to a Final Planned Unit Development for
the West End Redevelopment Project Located at the Southwest Quadrant of Interstate
394 and Highway 100 (The West End Redevelopment Project).
Councilmember Mavity requested that all of the documents are clear about whether the
project includes a dog run or dog park and that the documents clearly define the dog run
and that it is not accessible to the public.
Councilmember Hallfin requested information about the lease for the Olive Garden site.
Mr. Russ Krivor stated that Olive Garden has ten years left on its lease, and Olive Garden
has recently exercised a five-year extension and will likely be there until 2023. He added
Olive Garden has an additional five-year extension after that.
Mayor Pro Tem Sanger stated her opposition to this project because she felt the
development was too dense with the proposed density twice what is permitted in this
district and the majority of units being very small units. She stated this project does not
represent a housing option for people with children, there is no nearby park where kids
can play, and there is no place to walk a dog. She stated the City has been getting more
and more requests for rental apartments with too many small units and she questioned
whether this was good for the overall community and was concerned the City would end
up with high vacancy rates.
Mr. Krivor acknowledged Mayor Pro Tem Sanger’s concerns and agreed a city should
limit the number of rental projects. He stated The West End is a case study for cities
across the country for creating urban design within a city and apartments of this scope are
perfect for this location that is a haven for young professionals and empty nesters.
The motion passed 5-1 (Mayor Pro Tem Sanger opposed; Mayor Jacobs absent).
8d. First Reading – Miscellaneous Zoning Ordinance Amendments
Mr. Morrison presented the staff report and proposed changes to the zoning ordinance to
clarify and update several sections of the City Code. He explained that the amendments
to definitions are housekeeping amendments and noted that the Firearms Sales definition
has been slightly modified to state “Firearms sales means a retail use that includes a
facility where the primary use is the sale, lease, or purchase of firearms or ammunition”
and indicated this definition requires any retailer that sells firearms to obtain a CUP. He
stated another amendment allows the City to consider Comprehensive Plan amendments
in conjunction with other land use applications rather than separately.
Councilmember Mavity asked if these amendments address the unintentional irregularity
in the Ordinance regarding front lot lines that Council discussed at its last meeting.
Ms. McMonigal indicated the issue is more complicated than simply changing the front
yard and will require that staff look at a number of the lots in the City to determine the
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 3c) Page 11
Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of October 7, 2013
impacts before making an across the board change. She added staff tried to include that
here but was unable to do so and will bring the issue back to Council at a later date.
Councilmember Mavity requested that staff bring this before second reading if possible.
Councilmember Santa stated that the language regarding Significant Tree seems vague
and is not very specific related to aspen, cottonwood, or silver maple trees and requested
that staff make this more specific.
Mr. Morrison indicated the language used is an industry standard measurement and
agreed to review this section with the City Forester to see if language could be added.
It was moved by Councilmember Santa, seconded by Councilmember Spano, to approve
First Reading of Ordinance Amending the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code Relating to
Zoning by Amending Sections 36-4, 35, 74, 115, 142, 193, 223, 361, and 362 and to set
Second Reading for October 21, 2013.
Mayor Pro Tem Sanger requested information about outdoor seating allowed in the
Business Park district and how close the seating would be to residential property.
Mr. Morrison explained that outdoor seating would be limited to street side seating and
not in a back yard so there would be some buffering provided to residential areas.
Mayor Pro Tem Sanger requested that staff add buffering requirements or greater
distance requirements prior to second reading.
The motion passed 6-0 (Mayor Jacobs absent).
8e. Public Safety Software Agreement
Mr. Pires presented the staff report and explained that the City’s Police and Fire
Departments worked with PSC Alliance consultants to review four proposals that were
received following an RFP process and staff recommends entering into an agreement
with ZuercherTech LLC for use of its ledsSuite product offerings that includes Computer
Aided Dispatch (CAD), records, mobiles, jail, and automated vehicle locator system. He
advised that the acquisition of the software is $494,560 plus annual maintenance fees,
starting at $74,284 per year and the replacement of the Police Department’s software has
been budgeted in the capital improvement program and funds are available to support
maintenance of the software.
Ms. Dreier stated they have been working with Minnetonka on the new technology and
the Police Department will have its CAD set up at Minnetonka and Minnetonka will have
their CAD at St. Louis Park, adding that everything else is identical except the CAD.
It was moved by Councilmember Ross, seconded by Councilmember Mavity, to enter into
an Agreement with ZuercherTechnologies LLC in the amount of $494,560 plus annual
maintenance fees starting at $74,284 per year for provision of software licensing and
maintenance, hardware provision and maintenance, and several related services for use
of ZuercherTech’s ledsSuite product offerings to the City of St. Louis Park’s Police and
Fire Departments.
The motion passed 6-0 (Mayor Jacobs absent).
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 3c) Page 12
Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of October 7, 2013
9. Communications
Councilmember Santa reminded residents of the Halloween Party at Westwood Hills
Nature Center on Friday, October 18th, and Saturday, October 19th, from 6:30-9:00 p.m.
She noted that tickets are required and there is still time to get those tickets.
Councilmember Spano thanked everyone who attended and supported the fundraiser for
St. Louis Park Public Schools Foundation and STEP and stated the event was a great
success.
10. Adjournment
The meeting adjourned at 10:30 p.m.
______________________________________ ______________________________________
Nancy Stroth, City Clerk Susan Sanger, Mayor Pro Tem
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: October 21, 2013
Consent Agenda Item: 4a
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Second Reading of Ordinance Adopting 2014 Fees
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Approve Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance
establishing fees for 2014 as outlined in Appendix A of the City Code of Ordinances; and to
approve the summary ordinance for publication.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the Council agree with the proposed revisions to the fee
schedule to reflect fee adjustments for programs and services called for by ordinance?
SUMMARY: Each year our fees are reviewed by departments prior to renewal and as part of
our budget process. Some fees must be set and adjusted in accordance with our ordinance; other
fees are allowed to be set administratively. All fees are reviewed each year based on comparison
to other cities in the metro area, changes in regulations and to make sure our business costs are
covered for such service.
Sec. 1-19 of the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code states that fees called for within individual
provisions of the Code are to be set by ordinance and listed as Appendix A of the Code. Fees
must also be reviewed and reestablished annually. The Administrative Services Department has
worked with individual departments to complete this review and their recommendations are
included in the attached ordinance.
On October 7, 2013, Council approved first reading of the fee schedule and set second reading
for October 21. If approved, the fee increases will be effective January 1, 2014. Fees, rates and
charges called for by resolution or set by a department are not required by law to be included in
the Appendix A City Code fee schedule. Utility fees for 2014 water, sewer, storm water, and
solid waste rates are approved by Resolution and scheduled for council consideration this
evening. Staff will be presenting proposed 2014 liquor fees for approval by resolution at the
November 18, 2013 City Council Meeting.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The proposed fee increases have been
incorporated into the proposed 2014 budget.
VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion
Proposed Ordinance
Summary Ordinance
Prepared by: Nancy Stroth, City Clerk
Reviewed by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Consent Item No. 4a ) Page 2
Title: Second Reading of Ordinance Adopting 2014 Fees
DISCUSSION
BACKGROUND: Each Department Director has reviewed fees listed in Appendix A of the City
Code. The Administrative Services, Fire, Police, Engineering, and Operations & Recreation
Departments are recommending no increases in Appendix A fees for 2014. The Inspections and
Community Development Departments have each proposed fee increases, additions, or removals
that are the shown in Appendix A (attached). Unless otherwise noted, proposed fee increases
reflect the increased administrative costs of providing services and were comparable to other
cities.
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGES:
Assessing Department
Deed recording transfer fees are a County function, therefore this section was removed.
Community Development Department
A new zoning temporary use permit fee of $50 for mobile use vehicles (food or medical) was
established by Ordinance No. 2443-13 (effective July 13, 2013).
Engineering Department
With department restructuring, certain fee items previously under Public Works are now under
Engineering. There are no proposed City Code Appendix A fee changes for 2014.
Inspections Department
Permit and license fees proposed by the Inspections Department were increased when
appropriate to reflect inflationary costs and remain consistent with the “fee for service” program
philosophy.
The fees proposed to be increased for 2014 were 3% or less except for the Tree Maintenance
license and Solid Waste license vehicle decals. The proposed decal fee for the Tree Maintenance
license is $10, a $2.00 increase per decal. For the Solid Waste decal, the fee is proposed to be
$25, a $5.00 increase per decal.
A new fee of $750 for water access charge was established by Ordinance 2436-13 and
Resolution 13-010 (effective Jan. 1, 2014). This new fee was added and is based on the
additional future infrastructure needs projected, along with the estimated number of additional
WAC units generated over the next 20 years.
Operations & Recreation Department - With department restructuring, certain fee items
previously under Public Works are now under Operations & Recreation. There are no proposed
City Code Appendix A fee changes.
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Consent Item No. 4a ) Page 3
Title: Second Reading of Ordinance Adopting 2014 Fees
ORDINANCE NO. ____-13
ORDINANCE ADOPTING FEES FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2014
THE CITY COUNCIL OF ST. LOUIS PARK ORDAINS:
Section 1. Fees called for within individual provisions of the City Code are hereby
set by this ordinance for calendar year 2014.
Section 2. The Fee Schedule as listed below shall be included as Appendix A of the
City Code and shall replace those fees adopted October 15, 2012 by Ordinance No. 2422-12 for
the calendar year 2013 which is hereby rescinded.
ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTIES
Chapter 4 – Animal Regulations $50
Chapter 6 – Buildings & Building Regulations
Chapter 6, Article V – Property Maintenance Code $100
Chapter 8 – Business and Business Licenses $100
Chapter 12 – Environment $50
Chapter 12, Section 1 – Environment & Public Health
Regulations Adopted by Reference
$100
Chapter 12, Section 157 – Illicit Discharge and Connection $100
Chapter 12, Section 159 – Wetland Protection $100
Chapter 14 – Fire and Fire Prevention $50
Chapter 14, Section 75 – Open burning without permit $100
Chapter 20 – Parks and Recreation $50
Chapter 22 – Solid Waste Management $50
Chapter 22, Section 35b – Contagious Disease Refuse $200
Chapter 24 – Streets, Sidewalks & Public Places $50
Chapter 24, Section 24-43 – Household Trash & Recycling
Containers blocking public way
$25
Chapter 24, Section 50 – Public Property: Defacing or
injuring
$150
Chapter 24, Section 51 – Sweeping leaves into street
prohibited
$100
Chapter 24, Section 151 – Work in public right-of-way
without a permit
$100
Chapter 26 – Subdivision $100
Violation of a condition associated with a Subdivision
approval.
$750
Chapter 32 – Utilities $50
Chapter 36 – Zoning $50
Chapter 36, Section 37 – Conducting a Land Use not
permitted in the zoning district
$100
Violation of a condition associated with a Conditional Use
Permit, Planned Unit Development, or Special Permit
approval
$750
Repeat Violations within 24 Months
Double the amount of the fine imposed for the previous
violation, up to a maximum of $2,000. For example, if
there were four occurrences of a violation that carried a
$50 fine, the fine for the fourth occurrence would be $400
(first: $50; second: $100; third: $200; fourth: $400).
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Consent Item No. 4a ) Page 4
Title: Second Reading of Ordinance Adopting 2014 Fees
Fines in addition to abatement and licensing inspections
Fines listed above may be in addition to fees associated
with abatement and licensing inspections.
ASSESSING
Record Deed Transfer with Hennepin County $120 + Recording cost
CITY CLERK’S OFFICE
Domestic Partnership
Registration Application Fee $50
Amendment to Application Fee $25
Termination of Registration Fee $25
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Comprehensive Plan Amendments $2,000
Conditional Use Permit $2,000
Major Amendment $2,000
Minor Amendment $1,000
Fence Permit
Installation $15
Numbering of Buildings (New Addresses) $50
Official Map Amendment $500
Parking Lot Permit
Installation/Reconstruction $75
Driveway Permit $25
Planned Unit Development
Preliminary PUD $2,000
Final PUD $2,000
Prelim/Final PUD Combined $2,250
PUD - Major Amendment $2,000
PUD - Minor Amendment $1,000
Recording Filing Fee
Single Family $50
Other Uses $120
Registration of Land Use $50
Sign Permit
Erection of Temporary Sign $30
Erection of Real Estate, Construction Sign 40+ ft $30
Installation of Permanent Sign without footings $75
Installation of Permanent Sign with footings $100
Special Permits
Major Amendment $2,000
Minor Amendment $1,000
Street, Alley, Utility Vacations $800
Subdivision Dedication
Park Dedication (in lieu of land)
Commercial/Industrial Properties 5% of current market value of the unimproved
as determined by city assessor
Multi-family Dwelling Units $1,500 per dwelling unit
Single-family Dwelling Units $1,500 per dwelling unit
Trails $225 per residential dwelling unit
Subdivisions/Replats
Preliminary Plat $800 plus $90 per lot
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Consent Item No. 4a ) Page 5
Title: Second Reading of Ordinance Adopting 2014 Fees
Final Plat $500
Combined Process and Replats $900 plus $90 per lot
Exempt and Administrative Subdivisions $300
Temporary Use
Carnival & Festival over 14 days $1,000
Mobile Use Vehicle Zoning Permit (Food or Medical) $50
Time Extension $150
Traffic Management Plan
Administrative Fee $0.10 per sq ft of gross floor
Tree Replacement
Cash in lieu of replacement trees $115 per caliper inch
Variances
Commercial $500
Residential $300
Zoning Appeal $300
Zoning Letter $50
Zoning Map Amendments $2,000
Zoning Permit
Accessory Structures, 120 ft or less $25
Zoning Text Amendments $2,000
ENGINEERING PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Installation/repair of Sidewalk, Curb Cut or Curb and
Gutter Permit
$10 per 10 linear feet
Administrative Fee (all permits) $50
Work in Public Right-of-Way Permit
Administrative Fee (all permits) $50
Hole in Roadway/Blvd (larger than 10" diameter) $50 per hole
Trenching in Boulevard $200 per 100 linear feet (minimum $200)
Trenching in Roadway $400 per 100 linear feet (minimum $400)
FIRE DEPARTMENT
Fireworks Display Permit Actual costs incurred
Service Fees
Service Fee for fully-equipped & staffed vehicles $500 per hour for a ladder truck
$325 per hour for a full-size fire truck
$255 per hour for a rescue unit
Service Fee of a Chief Officer $100 per hour
After Hours Inspections $65 per hour (minimum 2 hrs.)
Tent Permit
Tent over 200 sq. ft. $75.00
Canopy over 400 sq. ft. $75.00
INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT
Building Demolition Deposit
1 & 2 Family Residential & Accessory Structures $2,500
All Other Buildings $5,000
Building Demolition Permit
1 & 2 Family Residential & Accessory Structures $150 $160
All Other Buildings $220 $240
Building Moving Permit $500
Business Licenses
Billboards $140 per billboard
Commercial Entertainment $280
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Consent Item No. 4a ) Page 6
Title: Second Reading of Ordinance Adopting 2014 Fees
Courtesy Bench $50
Dog Kennel $150
Environmental Emissions $310
Massage Therapy Establishment $330
Massage Therapy License $100
Therapists holding a Massage Therapy Establishment
License
$25 $30
Pawnbroker
License Fee $2,000
Per Transaction Fee $2
Investigation Fee $1,000
Penalty $50 per day
Sexually Oriented Business
Investigation Fee (High Impact) $500
High Impact $4,500
Limited Impact $125
Tobacco Products & Related Device Sales $485 $500
Vehicle Parking Facilities
Enclosed Parking $215
Parking Ramp $165
Certificate of Occupancy
For each condominium unit completed after building
occupancy
$100
Change of Use (does not apply to 1 & 2 family dwellings)
Up to 5,000 sq ft $300
5,001 to 25,000 sq ft $450
25,001 to 75,000 sq ft $670
75,001 to 100,000 sq ft $880
100,000 to 200,000 sq ft $1,100
above 200,000 sq ft $1,310
Temporary Certificate of Occupancy $55
Certificate of Property Maintenance
Certificate of Property Maintenance Extension $55
Change in Ownership
Condominium Unit $140
Duplex (2 Family dwellings) $300
Multi-Family (apartment) Buildings $250 per building +$12 per unit
Single Family Dwellings $220
All Other Buildings:
Up to 5,000 sq ft $300
5,001 to 25,000 sq ft $450
25,001 to 75,000 sq ft $670
75,001 to 100,000 sq ft $880
100,000 to 200,000 sq. ft $1,100
above 200,000 sq. ft $1,310
Temporary Certificate of Property Maintenance $70
Construction Permits (building, electrical, fire
protection, mechanical, plumbing, pools, utilities)
Building and Fire Protection Permits Valuation
Up to $500 Base Fee $45
$500.01 to $2,000.00 Base Fee $45 + $2 for each additional
(or fraction thereof) $100 over $500.01
$2,000.01 to $25,000.00 Base Fee $75 + $15 for each additional
(or fraction thereof)
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Consent Item No. 4a ) Page 7
Title: Second Reading of Ordinance Adopting 2014 Fees
$1,000 over $2,000.01
$25,000.01 to $50,000.00 Base Fee $420 + $10 for each additional
(or fraction thereof)
$1,000 over $25,000.01
$50,000.01 to $100,000.00 Base Fee $670 + $7 for each additional
(or fraction thereof)
$1,000 over $50,000.01
$100,000.01 to $500,000.00 Base Fee $1,020 + $5.60 for each additional (
fraction thereof)
$1,000 over $100.000.01
$500,000.01 to $1,000,000.00 Base Fee $3,260 + $4.75 for each additional
(or fraction thereof)
$1,000 over $500,000.01
$1,000,000.01 and up Base Fee $5,635 + $4.25 for each additional (
fraction thereof)
$1,000 over $1,000,000.01
Construction Permits (cont.)
Single Family Residential Exceptions:
Reroofing – asphalt shingled, sloped roofs only
House or House and Garage $140
Garage Only $70
Residing
House or House and Garage $140
Garage Only $70
Electrical Permit
Installation, Replacement, Repair $45 + 1.75% of job valuation
Installation of traffic signals per location $150
Single family, one appliance $45
Erosion Control Permit
Application and Review $150
ISTS Permit
(sewage treatment system install or repair) $125
Mechanical Permit
Installation, Replacement, Repair $45 + 1.75% of job valuation
Single Family Exceptions:
Replace furnace, boiler or furnace/AC $65
Install single fuel burning appliance with piping $65
Install, replace or repair single mechanical appliance $45
Plumbing Permit
Installation, Replacement, Repair $45 + 1.75% of job valuation
Single Family Exceptions:
Repair/replace single plumbing fixture $45
Private Swimming Pool Permit Building permit fees apply
Public Swimming Pool Permit Building permit fees apply
Sewer & Water Permit (all underground private utilities)
Installation, Replacement, Repair $45 + 1.75% of job valuation
Single Family Exceptions:
Replace/repair sewer or water service $75
Water Access Charge $750
Competency Exams Fees
Mechanical per test $30
Renewal - 3 year Mechanical $30
Contractor Licenses
Mechanical $100
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Consent Item No. 4a ) Page 8
Title: Second Reading of Ordinance Adopting 2014 Fees
Solid Waste $200
Tree Maintenance $90
Dog Licenses
1 year $25
2 year $40
3 year $50
Potentially Dangerous Dog License – 1 year $100
Dangerous Dog License – 1 year $250
Interim License $15
Off-Leash Dog Area Permit (non-resident) $55
Penalty for no license $40
Inspections
After Hours Inspections $65 per hour (minimum 2 hrs.)
Installation of permanent sign w/footing inspection Based on valuation using building
permit table
Re-Inspection Fee (after correction notice issued and has
not been corrected within 2 subsequent inspections)
$130
Insurance Requirements A minimum of:
Circus $1,000,000 General Liability
Commercial Entertainment $1,000,000 General Liability
Mechanical Contractors $1,000,000 General Liability
Solid Waste $1,000,000 General Liability
Tree Maintenance & Removal $1,000,000 General Liability
Vehicle Parking Facility $1,000,000 General Liability
ISTS Permit
Sewage treatment system install or repair $125
License Fees - Other
Investigation Fee $300 per establishment requiring a business
license
Late Fee 25% of license fee (minimum $50)
License Reinstatement Fee $250
Transfer of License (new ownership) $75
Plan Review
Building Permits 65% of Permit Fee
Repetitive Building 25% of Permit Fee for Duplicate Structure
Electrical Permits 35% of Permit Fee
Mechanical Permits 35% of Permit Fee
Plumbing Permits 35% of Permit Fee
Sewer & Water Permits 35% of Permit Fee
Single Family Interior Remodel Permits 35% of Permit Fee
Rental Housing License
Condominium/Townhouse/Cooperative $80 per unit
Duplex both sides non-owner occupied $150 per duplex
Housing Authority owned single family dwelling units $15 per unit
Multiple Family
Per Building $170
Per Unit $12
Single Family Unit $100 per dwelling unit
Temporary Noise Permit $60
Temporary Use Permits
Amusement Rides, Carnivals & Circuses $260
Commercial Film Production Application $80 $90
Petting Zoos $60
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Consent Item No. 4a ) Page 9
Title: Second Reading of Ordinance Adopting 2014 Fees
Vehicle Decals
Solid Waste $20 $25
Tree Maintenance & Removal $8 $10
POLICE DEPARTMENT
Animals
Animal Impound
Initial impoundment $25
2nd offense w/in year $40
3rd offense w/in year $50
4th offense w/in year $75
Boarding Per Day $25
Dangerous Dog Annual Review Hearing $250
Potentially Dangerous Dog Annual Review Hearing $100
Criminal Background Investigation
Volunteers & Employees $5
False Alarm
First $0
Each subsequent in same year $100
Late payment fee 10%
Solicitor/Peddler Registration $150
Lost ID Replacement Fee $25
Vehicle Forfeiture
Administrative fee in certain vehicle forfeiture cases $250
OPERATIONS & RECREATION PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Permit to Exceed Vehicle Weight Limitations (MSC) $30 each
Winter Parking Permit
Caregiver parking $25
No off-street parking available No Charge
Off-street parking available $125
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect January 1, 2014.
Public Hearing October 7, 2013
Second Reading October 21, 2013
Date of Publication October 25, 2013
Date Ordinance takes effect January 1, 2014
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council October 21, 2013
City Manager Mayor
Attest: Approved as to form and execution:
City Clerk City Attorney
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Consent Item No. 4a ) Page 10
Title: Second Reading of Ordinance Adopting 2014 Fees
SUMMARY
ORDINANCE NO. _____-13
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FEES CALLED FOR
BY ORDINANCE FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2014
This ordinance sets 2014 fees as outlined in Appendix A of the City Code of Ordinances. The
fee ordinance is modified to reflect the cost of providing services and is completed each year to
determine what, if any, fees require adjustment. This ordinance shall take effect January 1, 2014.
Adopted by the City Council October 21, 2013
Jeffrey W. Jacobs /s/
Mayor
A copy of the full text of this ordinance is available for inspection with the City Clerk.
Published in St. Louis Park Sailor: October 31, 2013
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: October 21, 2013
Consent Agenda Item: 4b
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Amendment to Liquor Licensed Premises for Applebee’s Neighborhood Grill & Bar
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to approve premises amendment to the on-sale
intoxicating and Sunday sales liquor license for Apple Minnesota, LLC, dba Applebee’s
Neighborhood Grill and Bar, relocating to 8312 State Highway 7 in St. Louis Park.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the Council wish to approve the premises amendment for
the liquor license at Applebee’s Neighborhood Grill and Bar?
SUMMARY: Applebee’s Neighborhood Grill and Bar, has made application to the City of St.
Louis Park for a premises amendment to their on-sale intoxicating liquor license currently
located at 8332 State Highway 7. Due to the redevelopment of the Knollwood Mall, the
Applebee’s restaurant will be relocating to another premises location within the Mall (very close
to their current location). The new location address will be 8312 State Highway 7, and the
premises will consist of approximately 5,600 square feet with seating for 216 persons. Mr. Todd
Michael Wetrosky will remain the on-site manager.
City Ordinance Section 3-68 (a) requires:
• No license may be transferred to another premises without the approval of the city
council
• Each liquor license shall be issued only for the exact rooms and square footage described
in the application
• A license is valid only in the compact and contiguous building or structure situated on
the premises described in the license.
If Council approves the premises amendment to Applebee’s liquor license, no liquor will actually
be served in the new premises until all required compliance is met with the City Inspections
Department and a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued for the new location.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: None
Prepared by: Kay Midura, Assistant – City Clerk’s Office
Reviewed by: Nancy Stroth, City Clerk
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: October 21, 2013
Consent Agenda Item: 4c
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Resolution Confirming Continued Water Main and Sewer Backup Coverage
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution Confirming Continued Water
Main and Sewer Backup Coverage.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the Council choose to continue to be covered for water
main breaks and sewer backups through the League of Minnesota Cities?
SUMMARY: On May 21, 2007, the Council adopted a resolution approving a Sanitary Sewer
Backup Policy. The Policy also provided for no-fault insurance for sewer backups through the
League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT). In 2010, the LMCIT automatically added
water main break coverage to the policy because the City qualified for the no fault sewer backup
coverage. In order to continue this coverage, the LMCIT is now requiring the Council to
formally adopt a resolution to expand the no fault sewer backup coverage to include water main
break coverage. Adopting the attached resolution will keep the same coverage the City currently
has.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Continuation of this coverage will help
protect the City’s assets against future claims.
VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution
Prepared by: Steven Heintz, Finance Supervisor
Reviewed by: Brian Swanson, Controller
Approved by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4c) Page 2
Title: Resolution Confirming Continued Water Main and Sewer Backup Coverage
RESOLUTION NO. 13-____
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING LIMITED CLEAN UP AND
PROPERTY DAMAGE PROTECTION FOR SEWER BACK-UPS AND
WATER MAIN BREAKS FOR WATER AND SEWER CUSTOMERS
WHEREAS, the Governmental Unit provides water and sanitary sewer services to
property within its jurisdiction; and
WHEREAS, water main breaks may cause water to enter into property causing damage; and
WHEREAS, blockages or other conditions in the Governmental Unit’s sanitary sewer
lines may cause the back-up of sewage into properties that are connected to those Governmental
Unit’s sanitary lines; and
WHEREAS, water main breaks and sewer back-ups pose a public health and safety
concern; and
WHEREAS, it is often difficult to determine the exact cause and responsibility for water
main breaks and sanitary sewer back-ups, and
WHEREAS, the governing body of the Governmental Unit desires to encourage the
expeditious clean-up of properties that have encountered damage from water main breaks and
sewer back-ups; and
WHEREAS, the governing body of the Governmental Unit desires to minimize the
potential of expensive lawsuits arising out of water main breaks and sanitary sewer back-up
claims; and
WHEREAS, the Governmental Unit is a member of the League of Minnesota Cities
Insurance Trust (LMCIT); and
WHEREAS, LMCIT has offered the Governmental Unit limited “no fault” sewer coverage
and water main break coverage that will reimburse users of the water and sewer system for
certain clean-up costs and property damage regardless of whether the Governmental Unit is at fault.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, as follows:
The Governmental Unit, as part of the contract for providing water and sewer services to the
customers of the Governmental Unit, and in consideration of the payment of water and sewer
bills, agrees to reimburse water and sanitary sewer customers for up to $40,000.of clean-up costs
and property damages caused by a water main break or sanitary sewer back-up, regardless of
whether the Governmental Unit is negligent or otherwise legally liable for damages, subject to
the following conditions:
I. Sanitary Sewer Back-Ups. For Sanitary sewer back-ups:
A. The back-up must have resulted from a condition in the Governmental Unit’s sanitary
sewer system or lines, and not from a condition in a private line.
B. The back-up must not have been caused by catastrophic weather or other events for
which Federal Emergency Management Assistance is available.
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4c) Page 3
Title: Resolution Confirming Continued Water Main and Sewer Backup Coverage
C. The back-up must not have been caused by an interruption in electric power to the
Governmental Unit’s sewer system or to any Governmental Unit lift station, which
continues for more than 72 hours.
D. The back-up must not have been caused by rainfall or precipitation that would constitute
a 100-year storm as determined by the National Weather Service.
E. Neither the Governmental Unit nor LMCIT will reimburse any costs which have been or
are eligible to be covered under a property owner’s own homeowners’ or other property
insurance, or which would be eligible to be reimbursed under a National Flood Insurance
Protection (NFIP) policy, whether or not the property owner actually has NFIP Coverage.
F. The maximum amount that the Governmental Unit or LMCIT will reimburse is $40,000.
per building, per year. In this regard, a structure or group of structures served by a single
connection to the Governmental Unit’s sewer system is considered a single building.
II. Water Main Breaks. For water main breaks:
A. LMCIT will pay for claims presented by the Governmental Unit for water main break
damage to property of others which was not caused by the Governmental Unit’s
negligence.
B. Neither the Governmental Unit nor LMCIT will pay for damages or expenses for which
the property owner has been or is eligible to be reimbursed by any homeowners’ or other
property insurance.
C. The maximum amount that the Governmental Unit or LMCIT will reimburse is $40,000.
to any claimant, regardless of the number of occurrences or the number of properties
affected.
D. Neither the Governmental Unit nor LMCIT will pay more than $250,000 for water main
break damages resulting from any single occurrence. All water main break damage
which occurs during any period of 72 consecutive hours is deemed to result from a single
occurrence. If the total water main break damage for all claimants in a single occurrence
exceeds $250,000, the reimbursement to each claimant will be calculated as follows:
1. A preliminary reimbursement figure is established for each claimant, equal to the
lesser of the claimant’s actual damages or $40,000.
2. The sum of the preliminary reimbursement figures for all claimants will be
calculated.
3. Each claimant will be paid a percentage of his or her preliminary reimbursement
figure, equal to the percentage calculated by dividing $250,000 by the sum of all
claimants’ preliminary reimbursement figures.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council October 21, 2013
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: October 21, 2013
Consent Agenda Item: 4d
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Amend Contract No. 13-12 w/ Summit Envirosolutions, Inc. for 2013 Consultant
Services
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to approve Amendment No. 3 in the amount of $73,500
to Contract 13-12, originally in the amount of $162,500, with Summit Envirosolutions, Inc. for
consultant services related to the implementation of the Reilly Tar and Chemical Corporation
Remedial Action Plan during 2013.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council have any questions regarding the
proposed contract amendment?
SUMMARY: On February 6, 2012 the City entered into a contract, in the amount of $167,000,
with Summit Envirosolutions, Inc. for consultant services related to the implementation of the
Reilly Tar & Chemical Corporation (“Reilly”) Remedial Action Plan (RAP) during 2012. That
contract was based on a mutually agreed upon work plan and projected expenditures (by task) to
be performed. Due to extra work needed to satisfy Agency concerns, Amendment No. 1 was
approved on November 30, 2012 increasing the 2012 amount from $167,000 to $214,000.
On December 17, 2012 the City authorized Amendment No. 2 to Contract No. 13-12 for
consultant services during 2013 up to a maximum of $162,500. As of October 4, Summit
expenses totaled $170,650; an additional $65,350 in expenses is expected before year end. Staff
is requesting this contract be amended to allow for an additional $73,500 in consultant services
to be performed this year, for a revised 2013 contract total of $236,000. This increase is due to
additional services, groundwater sampling, laboratory coordination, and project management.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The Water Utility Fund pays all Reilly
expenses and will be utilized to pay for this additional work.
Original Contract (Feb. 2012) $167,000
Amendment No. 1 (Nov. 2012) $47,000
Amendment No. 2 (Dec. 2012) $162,500
Amendment No. 3 (Oct. 2013) $73,500
Total $450,000
VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a leader in environmental
stewardship. We will increase environmental consciousness and responsibility in all areas of city
business.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion
Revised Cost Estimate
Contract Amendment
Prepared by: Mark Hanson, Superintendent of Operations
Reviewed by: Cindy Walsh, Director of Operations and Recreation
Approved by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4d) Page 2
Title: Amend Contract No. 13-12 w/ Summit Envirosolutions, Inc. for 2013 Consultant Services
DISCUSSION
BACKGROUND: Last year, under the direction of the City Manager, Staff made a concerted
effort to push the Agencies toward updating the CD/RAP pollutant criteria with the end goal of
the cessation of pumping in the upper groundwater aquifers. Unfortunately, this push has been
met with significant resistance from the Agencies. In turn, the City Manager has enlisted the legal
services of Lockridge, Grindal, Nauen to assist staff in developing a stronger technical argument.
The resulting technical inquiries from the Agencies have driven up the annual monitoring costs.
A brief summary of the tasks and additional services/costs are described below:
Task 100 - Annual Report: This task is expected to be $14,845 over budget. Comments
and requests from the Agencies (EPA and MPCA) related to the 2013 Annual Report
have required significant additional services from Summit. This extra work was
unforeseen but is necessary to remain in compliance with the CD-RAP governing the
Reilly superfund site.
Task 150 - Annual Progress Report: This task is generally on budget.
Task 400 - Ground Water Monitoring: This task is expected to be $13,000 over budget.
Agency comments on the 2013 Sampling Plan required collecting more samples than
were originally planned.
Task 480 -Sampling Plan and QAPP: This task is expected to be $6,000 over budget.
Each year this budget item is intended to cover the cost to prepare the plans for the
subsequent calendar year, due for submittal each October 31. More than the budgeted
amount has been expensed to date responding to the Agencies’ comments on the 2013
plans. The 2014 plan is still in development.
Task 600 - Lab Coordination and Audit: This task is expected to be $26,651 over
budget. The original budget assumed the use of a local lab for analyzing 85 samples at
$184 each. The Agencies did not approve of the local lab so samples are being sent to the
previously approved lab in Denver. The total per sample cost at the Denver lab is
approximately $445 plus shipping.
Task 700 - RAP Renegotiation/Site Closure Activities: This task is expected to be
$15,000 under budget. Subtask 1, Cessation Request Follow-up, has been delayed to
2014 due to the revised schedule associated with using Lockridge, Grindal, Nauen.
Task 810 – Program Management and Miscellaneous: This task is expected to be
$28,000 over budget. The scope of this task depends on the amount of communications
with the Agencies and the number of “miscellaneous” items that arise during the course
of the year. Despite our best intentions to hold down costs and match historical budgeted
amounts, 2013 has brought significant changes including St. Louis Park staff, Agency
staff, and support of the ongoing push to modify the CD-RAP.
The attached spreadsheet provides detailed monthly charges by Task associated with the Summit
Envirosolutions, Inc. contract along with original budget amounts and projected budget amounts
needed to complete this year’s contract work.
PRESENT CONSIDERATIONS: We have had a great working relationship with Summit
Envirosolutions, Inc. and recommend continuing to work with them.
NEXT STEPS: A 2014 contract with Summit Envirosolutions, Inc. will be brought to the
Council in December.
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4d) Page 3
Title: Amend Contract No. 13-12 w/ Summit Envirosolutions, Inc. for 2013 Consultant Services
Original Approximate Revised
Task Description Estimated Cost Costs to Date Estimated Cost
Task 100 - 2012 Annual Monitoring Report $14,000 $28,845 $28,845
Task 150 - 2012 Progress Report and GAC Plant Report $2,000 $2,250 $2,000
Task 400 - Groundwater Monitoring and Sample Shipment $33,000 $34,718 $46,000
Task 480 - 2014 Sampling Plan and QAPP $7,000 $10,282 $13,000
Task 500 - Five Year Review $0 $0 $0
Task 600 - Laboratory Coordination
Subtask 1: Lab coordination $4,500 $4,500
Subtask 2: Data validation and review $12,000 $20,000
Subtask 3: Alpha/Test America subcontract $16,000 $38,830
Subtask 4: Pace subcontract $2,500 $4,325
Subtask 5: Laboratory audits $9,000 $3,000
Task 600 Total $44,000 $38,327 $70,655
Task 700 - Site Closure (Cessation Activities)
Subtask 1: Cessation Request Follow-up $15,000 $0
Subtask 2: PCJ Gradient Control Assessment $17,500 $17,500
Subtask 2: CD-RAP modifications support $5,000 $5,000
Task 700 Total $37,500 $16,469 $22,500
Task 810 - Project Management and Miscellaneous $25,000 $39,759 $53,000
Total estimated costs $162,500 $170,650 $236,000
Revised Estimated Project Costs
2013 Reilly Superfund Site
October 2013
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4d) Page 4
Title: Amend Contract No. 13-12 w/ Summit Envirosolutions, Inc. for 2013 Consultant Services
CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK
AMENDMENT NO. 3 to CONTRACT NO. 13-12
THIS AGREEMENT is made on October 21, 2013, by and between the CITY OF ST.
LOUIS PARK, Minnesota, a Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as
“City"), and SUMMIT ENVIROSOLUTIONS, INC., a Minnesota corporation (hereinafter
referred to as "SUMMIT").
1. BACKGROUND. The parties have previously entered into an agreement for consulting
services dated February 6, 2012. Amendment No. 2 to this Agreement (December 17,
2012) authorizes Summit services in the amount of $162,500 for calendar year 2013.
2. CONTRACT AMOUNT. Subject to the modifications set forth herein, the Agreement is
increased an additional $73,500 to a maximum contract amount of $236,000 for calendar
year 2013.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the patties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed by their respective duly authorized officers.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed
by their respective duly authorized officers.
Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council October 21, 2013
City Manager Mayor
Attest: Summit Envirosolutions, Inc.
By_________________________________
City Clerk
Its__________________________________
By _________________________________
Its__________________________________
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: October 21, 2013
Consent Agenda Item: 4e
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Winter Trails Activity Permit with Three Rivers Park District (Plowing of Regional
Park Trails)
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Approve Contract with Three Rivers Park District to
clear and remove snow from the LRT and Cedar Lake Extension Trails through the City of St.
Louis Park for the 2013-2014 Winter Season.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish to continue this contract
relationship with Three Rivers Park District?
SUMMARY: The Southwest LRT and the Cedar Lake Extension trails are owned and
maintained by Three Rivers Park District. However, Three Rivers Park District does not clear or
remove snow from their trails during the winter. They will allow cities to plow snow from their
trails under the terms of a contract.
City staff have cleared and removed snow from the regional trails since 2000. This service is
appreciated by many of our residents who use the trails all year. As a part of the snow removal
policy, staff recommends the City of St. Louis Park continue to clear the regional trails through
our city since. Approving this contract would allow us to do so for the winter of 2013-2014.
Clearing or removing snow from the LRT trail will be done in much the same manner and
priority as previous years. The trails would be cleared as a part of the Operations and Recreation
snow removal policy. Clearing the Cedar Lake Extension is a bit more difficult. There are some
areas where the trail is 10 feet wide with only a 12-foot wide easement. If there are times when
the City gets several inches of snow at one time, it may be difficult for maintenance staff to
remove the snow since there is no room to store it and no way to access the trail to remove it.
Staff will keep the City Manager and City Council informed if the snow accumulations are
significant and maintenance staff are not able to remove the snow. The contract with Three
Rivers Park District states that the City must repair any damage to the trail while plowing snow.
Staff will take precautions to prevent damage in the snow removal process.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The resources necessary to undertake this
activity are included in the operating budget. There are no additional expenses expected that are
different from the previous years when we have plowed these trails. Our staff keep track of the
hours that we plowed the regional trails. Three Rivers Park District did reimburse us for the
snow season 2012-2013. We are hoping they will do the same for this upcoming season.
VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged
community.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Winter Trails Activity Permit
Prepared by: Stacy Voelker, Administrative Secretary
Reviewed by: Cindy Walsh, Director of Operations and Recreation
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4e)
Title: Winter Trails Activity Permit w/ Three Rivers Park District Page 2
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4e)
Title: Winter Trails Activity Permit w/ Three Rivers Park District Page 3
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4e)
Title: Winter Trails Activity Permit w/ Three Rivers Park District Page 4
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: October 21, 2013
Consent Agenda Item: 4f
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Second Reading – Miscellaneous Zoning Ordinance Amendments
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to approve second reading and Adopt Ordinance
amending Chapter 36 of the City Code pertaining to definitions; processing comprehensive plan
amendments and planning applications concurrently; fence height in the front yard; front yard
setbacks in commercial zoning districts; compact parking dimensions; and allowing outdoor
seating with food and beverage service in the Business Park zoning district, and to approve the
summary ordinance for publication.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: Should the City make the proposed revisions to the zoning
ordinance?
SUMMARY: Staff is requesting several amendments to the Zoning Ordinance to clarify such
items as definitions; processing comprehensive plan amendments and planning applications
concurrently; fence height in the front yard; front yard setbacks in commercial zoning districts;
compact parking dimensions; and allowing outdoor seating in the Business Park zoning district.
First reading: At the First Reading, the Council asked that staff review two items:
1. Consider an alternative to using the term “diameter at breast height (DBH)” in the
Significant Tree definition. Staff reviewed this request with Jim Vaughan, Environmental
Coordinator, and he suggested replacing “DBH” with 4.5 feet from the ground, which is the
equivalent of DBH.
2. Mitigating outdoor seating when adjacent to residential uses. Outdoor seating is not allowed
in the rear yard or side yard when adjacent to residential. This provision protects residential
uses by requiring the outdoor seating to be located between the business and the street, not
between the business and the residence. Outdoor seating also has limited hours in the C-1
(7am to 10pm). In the C-2 District, outdoor seating is limited to the same hours when
located within 500 feet of residential property. These regulations have successfully mitigated
potential impacts to date; therefore staff does not recommend additional measures.
Staff also corrected a condition in the Liquor Store approval in the C-2 District to remove the
1,000 foot minimum distance requirement from another liquor store. This condition was
inadvertently included in the text.
NEXT STEPS: If the second reading is approved, the ordinance will be published on October
31, 2013, and take effect on November 15, 2013.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
VISION CONSIDERATION: Not Applicable
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Draft Ordinance
Summary Ordinance for Publication
Prepared by: Gary Morrison, Assistant Zoning Administrator
Reviewed by: Sean Walther, Senior Planner
Michele Schnitker, Housing Supervisor
Approved by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4f) Page 2
Title: Second Reading – Miscellaneous Zoning Ordinance Amendments
ORDINANCE NO.____-13
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ST. LOUIS PARK
ORDINANCE CODE RELATING TO ZONING BY
AMENDING SECTIONS 36-4, 35, 74, 115, 142, 193, 194, 223, 361, AND 362
THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK DOES ORDAIN:
Findings
Sec. 1. The City Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning
Commission (Case No.13-35-ZA).
Sec. 2. The St. Louis Park Ordinance Code, Sections 36-4, 35, 74, 115, 142, 193, 194, 223, 361,
and 362, is hereby amended by deleting stricken language and adding underscored language.
Section breaks are represented by ***.
ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL
***
Sec. 36-4. Definitions.
***
Brewery means a facility that manufactures alcoholic and nonalcoholic malt liquor. This
definition does not include breweries operated in conjunction with a restaurant as an accessory
use.
Taproom means a facility where on-sale of malt liquor produced by the brewer for consumption
on the premises of, or adjacent to, the brewery location owned by the brewer at which the malt
liquor is produced.
Significant Tree - Any tree, with the exception of Salix (Willow), Boxelder, Siberian Elm and
Black Locust, is considered to be significant under the landscaping section of the zoning
ordinance if it is at least five caliper inches for deciduous trees and six caliper inches for
conifers. Aspen, Cottonwood or Silver Maple are considered significant if they are at least 12
inches in diameter at 4.5 feet from the ground. means any mature tree as defined in the City of
St. Louis Park’s Landscape Tree List.
***
ARTICLE II. ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT*
***
Sec. 36-35. Amendments.
***
(d) Procedure for comprehensive plan and amendments.
***
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4f) Page 3
Title: Second Reading – Miscellaneous Zoning Ordinance Amendments
7. If the requested application for a comprehensive plan amendment involves a land use or
density change on a particular parcel of land, no and the request also includes an application for a
conditional use permit, planned unit development, or variance related to that parcel shall all
applications may be accepted for processing until action on the comprehensive plan amendment
has been completed and handled concurrently.
***
ARTICLE III. GENERAL PROVISIONS
***
Sec. 36-74. Fences.
***
(d) Height. The height shall be measured from the ground level to the top of the fence or wall
section. In the case where a fence has variable heights or where the ground slopes, the height of
the fence shall be the average height, but in no case shall the height of any one point exceed six
inches above the maximum allowed by this section. Fence posts may exceed eight inches above
the maximum allowed by this section.
(1) A fence or all shall not exceed six feet in height if it is located in any side or rear yard.
(2) A fence, wall or hedge shall not exceed 3 1/2 four feet in height if located in a front yard.
***
ARTICLE IV. ZONING DISTRICTS
DIVISION 1. GENERALLY
Sec. 36-115. Land use by zoning district.
TABLE 36-115B
ZONING DISTRICTS
TABLE OF BULK REGULATIONS
Zoning Districts R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 R-C C-1 C-2 O I-P I-G M-X
Minimum lot width
1-2 story or 25 feet 75 60 60 60 80 -- -- 100 75 50 --
3-story or 35 feet 75 60 60 60 80 -- -- 100 100 75 --
4-story or 48 feet N/A N/A N/A 60 80 N/A -- 100 100 75 --
5-6 story or 75 feet N/A N/A N/A 60 80 N/A -- 100 150 100 --
Minimum lot area
1-2 story or 25 feet 9,000 7,200 7,200 8,000 15,000 -- -- 15,000 15,000 5,000 --
3-story or 35 feet 9,000 7,200 7,200 8,000 15,000 -- -- 15,000 18,000 7,500 --
4-story or 48 feet N/A N/A N/A 8,000 15,000 N/A -- 15,000 18,000 7,500 --
5-6 story or 75 feet N/A N/A N/A 8,000 15,000 N/A -- 15,000 22,500 10,000 --
Maximum density 4.8 6 10.9 30* 50* N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 50*
Maximum height 30 30 35 40* 75* 35 75 240 75 75 *
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4f) Page 4
Title: Second Reading – Miscellaneous Zoning Ordinance Amendments
Floor area ratio
(FAR)
0.3 0.3 0.4 0.7 1.2 1.2 2.0 1.5 0.5 1.0 1.5*
Ground floor area
ratio (GFAR)
0.3 0.3 0.25 0.25 0.25 -- -- -- -- -- --
Minimum yard widths
Front 30* 25* 25* 30* 30* 5* 5* 20* 50* 20 --
Side 1
1-2 story or 25 feet 6 5 6 15 15 0* 0* 15 20 12 --
3-story or 35 feet 6 5 6 15 15 0* 0* 15 25 12 --
4-story or 48 feet N/A N/A N/A 15+ 15+ N/A 15* 15+ 30 12 --
5-6 story or 75 feet N/A N/A N/A 15+ 15+ N/A 15* 15+ 35 12 --
Side 2
1-2 story or 25 feet 9* 7* 9* 1/2 1/2 0* 0* 1/2 20 0 --
3-story or 35 feet 9* 7* 9* 1/2 1/2 0* 0* 1/2 25 0 --
4-story or 48 feet N/A N/A N/A 1/2 1/2 N/A 15 1/2 30 0 --
5-6 story or 75 feet N/A N/A N/A 1/2 1/2 N/A 15 1/2 35 12 --
Side abutting street 15 15* 15* 15 15 15 15 15 25 15 --
Rear
1-2 story or 25 feet 25 25 25 25* 25* 10* 0* 15 20 10 --
3-story or 35 feet 25 25 25 25* 25* 10* 0* 15 20 10 --
4-story or 48 feet N/A N/A N/A 25* 25* N/A 1/2 1/2 40 20 --
5-6 story or 75 feet N/A N/A N/A 25* 25* N/A 1/2 1/2 40 20 --
1/2 = one-half building height.
+ = plus one-half building height.
*Certain conditions cause these figures to vary
***
DIVISION 2. LAND USE DESCRIPTIONS AND CHARACTERISTICS
***
Sec 36-142. Descriptions.
***
(d) Commercial uses.
***
(7) Brewery means a facility that manufactures alcoholic and nonalcoholic malt liquor. This
definition does not include breweries operated in conjunction with a restaurant as an accessory
use.
(78) Business/trade school/college means a training establishment or institution serving
adults and sometimes high school age persons which provides training and/or education toward a
skill, license or degree.
(Ord. No. 2358-08, 8-14-08)
(89) Convention and exhibition center means a facility providing large and small meeting
rooms for the assembly of persons and the display of products and information. It may include
banquet kitchens and facilities. Characteristics include heavy parking and loading area
requirements and large scale buildings.
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4f) Page 5
Title: Second Reading – Miscellaneous Zoning Ordinance Amendments
(910) Currency exchange means any business or person except a bank, trust company, savings
bank, savings and loan association, credit union, or industrial loan and thrift company that is
engaged in the business of cashing checks, drafts, money orders, or traveler’s checks for a fee.
(Ord. No. 2349-08, 02-22-08)
(101) Dry cleaning, laundering with route pickup and delivery, means a facility where
clothing, diapers or other fabrics are cleaned by dry cleaning or laundering processes. Materials
to be cleaned may be brought to the site either by pickup and delivery trucks operated as part of
the business or by customers who drop off and pick up their own materials to be cleaned. The
use may include the storage of delivery vehicles on the site.
(12) Firearms sales means a retail use that includes the sale, lease, or purchase of firearms or
ammunition.
(113) Food service means the on-site sale of food and beverages which are prepared and
served in individual portions in a ready to consume state for consumption either on-site or off-
site, including seating for not more than ten persons. Characteristics may include truck and
vehicle traffic, cooking odors and refuse. The preferred location is on major thoroughfares with
no access to local residential streets. This use is often found in conjunction with motor fuel
stations and grocery stores.
(124) Home occupation means an occupation, profession, or activity which provides gainful
employment to a resident of a dwelling unit which is clearly an incidental and subordinate use to
the residential use and which does not alter the exterior of the property or affect the residential
character of the neighborhood. Auto body/painting, motor vehicle sales, motor vehicle service
and repair, retail sales, massage, medical/dental office, animal handling, beauty shop and
barbershop, warehouse/storage and manufacturing/processing do not qualify as home
occupations.
(135) Hotel means a lodging facility operated under the auspices of a national or
international hostel organization which has dormitory rooms available for rent by members. The
facility has common cooking and eating facilities and may have common restroom facilities. The
duration of stay is typically short and the facility has a resident manager.
(146) Hotel/motel means facilities which provide overnight lodging in individual rooms or
suites of rooms, each having a private bathroom, which are rented by day or week. These
facilities may include in-room or in-suite kitchens and recreational facilities for use by lodgers.
Restaurants, banquet rooms, arcades, fitness centers and other facilities available to nonlodgers
are not considered accessory uses.
(157) In-vehicle sales or service means sales or service to persons in vehicles. It may include
drive-in, drive-up and drive-through facilities, but does not include motor fuel stations.
Characteristics include high traffic volumes during the typical peak hour traffic period.
(18) Liquor store means a facility principally for the retail sale of pre-packaged alcoholic
beverages for off-premise consumption.
(169) Medical and dental laboratories mean facilities in which individually produced and
made to order medical and dental prosthetics are crafted for the specific needs of specific
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4f) Page 6
Title: Second Reading – Miscellaneous Zoning Ordinance Amendments
individuals. Characteristics may include hours of operation of 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.; daily
deliveries to and from the facilities by car, van or light truck; minimal heavy truck traffic; no use
of outside storage and occasional visitation of facilities by customers needing specialized
attention as to the make-up and fit of their specific prosthesis.
(1720) Motor fuel station means a facility which supplies and dispenses at retail motor fuels
directly into a motor vehicle; it also includes the sale of lubricants, batteries, tires and motor
vehicle accessories. Motor fuels may be self-serve or dispensed by an attendant. Light
maintenance activities to vehicles including engine tune-ups, lubrication, repairs, and carburetor
cleaning may also be conducted. Characteristics include outdoor activity, high traffic generation
and extended hours of operation. This use excludes heavy automobile repair including, but not
limited to, engine overhauls, automobile painting, and bodywork.
(1821) Motor vehicle sales means display, sale, and rental of automobiles, trucks and
recreational vehicles from an indoor showroom facility and may include an outdoor sales lot;
motor vehicle service and repair and autobody/painting often occur in conjunction with this use.
Characteristics may include outdoor activity, banners and lights for promotion and advertising,
outdoor sound systems, truck deliveries, night and weekend operating hours, and test driving on
nearby streets.
(Ord. No. 2248-03, 8-18-03)
(1922) Motor vehicles service and repair means repair, lubrication, washing, detailing,
equipment installation, engine overhauls, and other similar uses involving automobiles, trucks
and recreational vehicles. Characteristics may include the storage of vehicles, truck traffic, night
and weekend operating hours; motor fuel stations and autobody/painting are excluded.
(203) Office means a facility in which the handling of information or the performing of
administrative services is conducted. It includes services provided to persons both on-site and
off-site on a walk in or appointment basis such as counseling or indirect or nonpersonal service
such as real estate, travel agencies, financial agencies, insurance offices and professional offices.
This description excludes hospitals or other medical facilities; except it may include up to a
maximum of ten percent of the gross floor area in medical or dental offices. Characteristics
include high peak period traffic generation and 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. hours of operation.
(214) Outdoor sales means the display and sale or rental of merchandise or equipment
outside of an enclosed building. It may include boat sales, canoe sales, nursery sales; but it
excludes the sale of motor vehicles.
(225) Pawnshop means a facility where money is loaned based on the value of goods deposited
at the facility by the borrower of the money, which goods are held by the lender of the money
occupying the facility as collateral for the loan. Items held by the lender which are not redeemed
by a borrower may be put up for sale at the facility to the general public. The term pawnshop
includes a facility where all or any part of the pawnshop activities are conducted.
(Ord. No. 2349-08, 2-22-08)
(236) Payday loan agency means any business that has as its primary activity the providing of
short-term loans for the borrower’s own personal, family, or household purpose which are
usually for a period of forty-five (45) days or less. Payday loan agencies do not include banks.
(Ord. No. 2349-08, 2-22-08)
(247) Places of Assembly are facilities designed to accommodate larger groups of people
having shared goals, desires or interests that are not customarily business related. Social,
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4f) Page 7
Title: Second Reading – Miscellaneous Zoning Ordinance Amendments
educational, recreational, religious, and dining activities may be included. Characteristics may
include large group meetings or activities with peak parking demands and noise. If the floor area
devoted to food or beverage sales exceeds 50% of the total gross floor area, the facility will be
classified as a restaurant.
(Ord. No. 2311-06, 1-18-06)
(258) Post office customer service means the retail/customer service portion of the post
office function that includes customer drop off of packages and mail; sale to the public of
stamps, money orders, insurance, envelopes and packaging materials, and other mail services;
and post office boxes. Characteristics include hours similar to offices and Saturday mornings,
high volumes of automobile traffic and some truck traffic. Mail sorting for mail route delivery
and distribution are not part of this land use.
(269) Printing process/supply means a facility in which retail-oriented graphic and
photographic reproductive services are conducted. This does not include industrial operations
where printing is of a commercial nature.
(2730) Private entertainment (indoor) means entertainment services provided entirely within
an enclosed building. It includes theaters, health or fitness centers, bowling alleys, arcades, roller
rinks, and pool halls. Characteristics may include late operating hours, outdoor lighting, noise,
and traffic.
(2831) Restaurant means an establishment whose principal business is the sale of food and
beverages which are prepared and served in individual portions in a ready-to-consume state for
consumption on site. This use is often found in conjunction with bars, hotels and food service. It
is preferably located on major thoroughfares with no access to residential streets. Characteristics
include late hours of operation, refuse, high car and truck traffic generation, and cooking odors.
A food service or deli is not considered to be a restaurant if seating is provided for ten or fewer
persons.
(2932) Retail means a facility where merchandise or equipment is displayed and rented or sold
and where delivery of merchandise or equipment to the ultimate consumer is made. This use
includes limited production, repair or processing as an accessory use. Hours of operation
generally begin after the a.m. peak traffic period and extend to time ranges from 5:00 p.m. to
10:00 p.m.; although some convenience stores and grocery stores are open 24 hours per day.
Characteristics generally include high parking demand and high off-peak traffic generation;
generally prefers high visibility and access to major thoroughfares. This use includes but is not
limited to camera shops, clothing stores, department stores, grocery stores, discount stores,
jewelry stores, delicatessens, retail bakeries, toy stores; but excludes restaurants, bars, pawn
shops, motor vehicle sales, motor fuel stations, and large item retail.
(29.133) Retail, large item means a facility where large item merchandise or equipment is
displayed and rented or sold and where delivery of merchandise or equipment to the ultimate
customer is made. Characteristics generally include hours of operation between 9:00 a.m. and
9:00 p.m. weekdays and weekends. The parking demand per square foot of building area is
normally less than the demand for general retail. This use includes but is not limited to, furniture
stores, carpet stores, large appliance stores; but excludes motor vehicle sales, pawnshops, and
retail.
(304) Service means on-site service provided directly to an individual. This use includes
barbershops, beauty shops, therapeutic massage, nail salon, laundromats, shoe repair shops, and
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4f) Page 8
Title: Second Reading – Miscellaneous Zoning Ordinance Amendments
dry cleaners where articles to be cleaned are picked up and delivered by the patron. This use
excludes pawnshops. (Ord. No. 2358-08, 8-14-08)
(315) Sexually-oriented business means any limited impact sexually-oriented business or any
high impact sexually-oriented business.
***
(326) Shopping center means a group of commercial uses planned, owned and managed as a
unit that has common parking facilities. Shopping centers may include more than one building
and more than one contiguous property and owner if approved under a single conditional use
permit or planned unit development. (Ord. No. 2248-03, 8-18-03)
(337) Studio means a facility where the practice or study of the visual and audio arts occurs.
This use may include painting, sculpting, photography, recording, radio and television studios.
This use also includes dance studios and studios for the martial arts. This use does not include
large industrial photography or printing processes.
(38) Taproom means a facility where on-sale of malt liquor produced by the brewer for
consumption on the premises of, or adjacent to, the brewery location owned by the brewer at
which the malt liquor is produced.
***
DIVISION 5. COMMERCIAL DISTRICT REGULATIONS*
***
Sec. 36-193. C-1 neighborhood commercial district.
***
(e) Accessory uses.
***
(5) Outdoor seating and service of food and beverages is permitted as an accessory use to a
restaurant if with the following conditions:
a. The use shall not be located in the interior side or back yard if it is adjacent to a parcel
that is occupied by a residential dwelling. This provision will not apply if the first floor of
the building located on the adjacent parcel is not occupied by a residential dwelling or if a
residential dwelling is located above the restaurant principal use.
***
d. Additional parking will not be required if the outdoor seating area does not exceed 500
square feet or ten percent of the gross floor area of the restaurant principal use, whichever
is less. Parking will be required at the same rate as the principal use for that portion of
outdoor seating area in excess of 500 square feet or ten percent of the gross building area,
whichever is less.
(f) Dimensional standards/densities.
(4) The front yard shall be a minimum of five feet. unless a greater depth is required to meet
screening requirements. If the average depth of at least two existing front yards, for buildings
within 150 feet along the same block front of the lot in question, are less or greater than 20 feet,
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4f) Page 9
Title: Second Reading – Miscellaneous Zoning Ordinance Amendments
in that case the required front yards shall be the average depth of such existing front yards, but
the depth of a front yard shall not be less than five feet nor be required to exceed 50 feet.
***
Sec. 36-194. C-2 neighborhood commercial district.
***
(c) Uses permitted with conditions.
***
(23) High impact sexually-oriented business.
***
b. No person shall operate a high impact sexually-oriented business on property, any part of
which is within the area circumscribed by a circle which has a radius of 1,000 feet from
another high impact sexually-oriented business, pawnshop, currency exchange, payday
loan agency, firearms sales, or liquor store.
(d) Uses permitted by conditional use permit.
***
(16) Pawnshops. The conditions are as follows:
a. The lot must be at least 1,000 feet from the property line of a site containing another
pawnshop, currency exchange, payday loan agency, gun shop firearms sales, liquor store or
sexually-oriented business. In the case of a shopping center of multi-use building, the distance
shall be measured from the portion of the center or building occupied by the pawnshop.
***
(19) Liquor stores. The lot must be at least 1,000 feet from the property line of a site
containing a pawnshop, currency exchange, payday loan agency, firearms sales or sexually-
oriented business. In the case of a shopping center of multi-use building, the distance shall be
measured from the portion of the center or building occupied by the liquor store.
***
(f) Accessory uses.
***
(7) Outdoor seating and service of food and beverages is permitted as an accessory use to a
restaurant if:
a. The use shall not be located in the interior side or back yard if it is adjacent to a parcel
that is occupied by a residential dwelling. This provision will not apply if the first floor of
the building located on the adjacent parcel is not occupied by a residential dwelling or if a
residential dwelling is located above the restaurant principal use.
***
d. Additional parking will not be required if the outdoor seating area does not exceed 500
square feet or ten percent of the gross floor area of the restaurant principal use, whichever
is less. Parking will be required at the same rate as the principal use for that portion of
outdoor seating area in excess of 500 square feet or ten percent of the gross building area,
whichever is less.
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4f) Page 10
Title: Second Reading – Miscellaneous Zoning Ordinance Amendments
***
(g) Dimensional standards/densities.
***
(4) The front yard shall be a minimum of five feet. unless a greater depth is required to meet
screening requirements. If the average depth of at least two existing front yards, for buildings
within 150 feet along the same block front of the lot in question, are less or greater than 20 feet,
in that case the required front yards shall be the average depth of such existing front yards, but
the depth of a front yard shall not be less than five feet nor be required to exceed 50 feet.
***
DIVISION 6. OFFICE DISTRICT REGULATIONS*
***
Sec. 36-223. O office district.
***
(f) Accessory uses.
***
(5) Outdoor seating and service of food and beverages is permitted as an accessory use to a
restaurant if:
a. The use is separated from any adjacent residential use by a building wall or six foot
fence. This provision will not apply if the residential use is located on an upper story
above a restaurant the principal use.
***
d. Additional parking will not be required if the outdoor seating area does not exceed 500
square feet or ten percent of the gross floor area of the restaurant principal use, whichever
is less. Parking will be required at the same rate as the principal use for that portion of
outdoor seating area in excess of 500 square feet or ten percent of the gross building area,
whichever is less.
***
DIVISION 7. BUSINESS PARK DISTRICT REGULATIONS*
***
Sec. 36-233. BP business park district.
***
(f) Accessory uses.
***
(4) Outdoor seating and service of food and beverages is permitted as an accessory use if
with the following conditions:
a. The use must be separated from any adjacent residential use by a building wall or six foot
fence. This provision will not apply if the residential use is located on an upper story
above the principal use.
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4f) Page 11
Title: Second Reading – Miscellaneous Zoning Ordinance Amendments
b. No speakers or other electronic devices which emit sound are permitted if the use is
located within 500 feet of a residential use.
c. The hours of operation shall be limited to 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. if the use is located
within 500 feet of a residential use.
d. Additional parking will not be required if the outdoor seating area does not exceed 500
square feet or ten percent of the gross floor area of the principal use, whichever is less.
Parking will be required at the same rate as the principal use for that portion of outdoor
seating area in excess of 500 square feet or ten percent of the gross building area,
whichever is less.
(45) Parking ramps, subject to the conditions for parking ramps found in Section 36-233
(d)(6).
(56) Parking lots.
(67) Post Office Customer Service.
(78) Showroom.
(89) Warehouse / Storage.
***
ARTICLE V. SPECIAL PROVISIONS
Sec. 36-361. Off-street parking areas, paved areas, and loading spaces.
***
(k) Design Requirements
***
PARKING LOT DIMENSIONS
Table 36-361 (b)
Stall Angle
(degrees)
Curb Length
(feet)
Vehicle Projection
(feet)
Aisle Width
(feet)
Total Width
(feet)
45 Standard
Compact
12.0
11.5
18.5
17.0
13.0*
50.0
60 Standard
Compact
10.0
9.5
20.0
18.0
15.0*
55.0
75 Standard
Compact
9.0
8.5
20.5
17.5
18.0*
59.0
90 Standard
Compact
8.5
8.0
18.0
16.0
25.0
61.0**
Parallel Standard
Compact
23.0
21.0
8.5
8.0
22.0
38.0
***
Sec. 36-362. Sign regulations.
***
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4f) Page 12
Title: Second Reading – Miscellaneous Zoning Ordinance Amendments
(f) General provisions.
***
(2) Required yards. Sign shall maintain a 10 foot minimum yard to property line unless
exempted below:
a. In the C-1, and C-2, BP, and M-X districts the required yard for any sign less than 200
square feet in sign area shall be 5 feet.
***
TABLE 36-362A
SIGN AREA AND HEIGHT
***
I-P / BP
0 – 20,000 25 100 75 80 80
20,000 – 50,000 25 200 100 80 80
Over 50,000 – 100,000 25 250 150 80 80
Over 100,000 25 350 300 80 80
***
(g) Adjustments to table 36-362A.
***
(4) In the C-1, C-2, O, BP, I-G and I-P districts, the total area of all wall signs on a building
which meets the following outlined conditions shall not be included in calculating the aggregate
sign area on a lot:
Sec. 3. The contents of Planning Case File 13-35-ZA are hereby entered into and made
part of the public hearing record and the record of decision for this case.
Sec. 4. This Ordinance shall take effect fifteen days after its publication.
Public Hearing September 18, 2013
First Reading October 7, 2013
Second Reading October 21, 2013
Date of Publication October 31, 2013
Date Ordinance takes effect November 15, 2013
Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council
City Manager Mayor
Attest: Approved as to Form and Execution:
City Clerk City Attorney
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4f) Page 13
Title: Second Reading – Miscellaneous Zoning Ordinance Amendments
SUMMARY
ORDINANCE NO.____ -13
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING MISCELLANEOUS
ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS
This ordinance states that several amendments will be made to clarify such items as definitions;
processing comprehensive plan amendments and planning applications concurrently; fence
height in the front yard; front yard setbacks in commercial zoning districts; compact parking
dimensions; and allowing outdoor seating with food and beverage service in the Business Park
zoning district.
This ordinance shall take effect 15 days after publication.
Adopted by the City Council October 21, 2013
Jeffrey W. Jacobs /s/
Mayor
A copy of the full text of this ordinance is available for inspection with the City Clerk.
Published in St. Louis Park Sailor: October 31, 2013
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: October 21, 2013
Consent Agenda Item: 4g
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Wooddale Flats – Second Reading of Ordinance to Rezone Property
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Approve Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance
amending the Official Zoning Map to change the zoning of 3998 Wooddale Avenue and 4017
Utica Avenue from R-2 Single-Family Residence to R-4 Multiple-Family Residence, and
approve the summary ordinance contained in the agenda materials for publication.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: Is the rezoning consistent with the Comprehensive Plan?
SUMMARY: The subject property is the site of the former Most Holy Trinity Church and
School. The proposed development includes six new condominium buildings with a total of 33
units. The existing church/school building, playground and two single-family homes would be
razed. The project includes five three-story buildings and one two-story building. The proposed
site plan provides sidewalk connections through and around the site and includes areas for storm
water management, outdoor recreation, and landscaping. The development provides on-site
parking for residents in garages and in 52 surface stalls along a private driveway behind the six
buildings. The overall net density of the development would be 15 units per acre.
The rezoning would make the property consistent with the comprehensive plan and the proposed
use of the property.
The City Council approved the first reading of the ordinance on October 7, 2013. A
supermajority of the City Council (five affirmative votes) is required to adopt the ordinance
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a well-maintained and
diverse housing stock.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Proposed Ordinance
Summary Ordinance for Publication
Zoning Illustrations
Prepared by: Ryan Kelley, Associate Planner
Reviewed by: Meg McMonigal, Planning and Zoning Supervisor
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4g) Page 2
Title: Wooddale Flats – Second Reading of Ordinance to Rezone Property
ORDINANCE NO.____-13
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ST. LOUIS PARK ORDINANCE CODE
CHANGING BOUNDARIES OF ZONING DISTRICTS FROM R-2 TO R-4
3998 WOODDALE AVENUE SOUTH
4017 UTICA AVENUE SOUTH
THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK DOES ORDAIN:
Section 1. The City Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the
Planning Commission (Case No. 13-32-Z).
Section 2. The St. Louis Park Zoning Ordinance adopted December 28, 1959,
Ordinance No. 730; amended December 31, 1992, Ordinance No. 1902-93, amended December
17, 2001, Ordinance No. 2216-01, as heretofore amended, is hereby further amended by
changing the zoning district boundaries by reclassifying the following described lands from their
existing land use district classification to the new land use district classification as indicated for
the tract as hereinafter set forth, to wit:
(Area to be platted as Lot 1, Block 1, Wooddale Flats)
Those parts of the following described property:
Parcel 1:
Lots 1 to 4 inclusive, Lots 37 and 38, Lot 36, except the South 10
feet thereof, all in Block 2, Browndale, according to the recorded
plat thereof, and situate in Hennepin County, Minnesota.
(Abstract Property)
Parcel 2:
That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of
Section 7, Township 28 North, Range 24 West of the Fourth
Principal Meridian described as follows: Commencing at a point
399.96 feet East of the Southwest corner of the Northwest Quarter
of the Northwest Quarter of section in center of cross road
extending from Excelsior Avenue in Southeasterly direction
through said section; thence South 34 degrees 12 minutes East
279.62 feet along center line of cross road to point of beginning of
tract to be described; thence continuing along last described line
300 feet; thence South 67 degrees West 191 feet; thence North 34
degrees 12 minutes West on a line parallel with said center line of
cross road to a point drawn Southwesterly from the actual point of
beginning and a right angle to the center line of said cross road;
thence Northeasterly along said right angle line to the actual point
of beginning, according to the United States Government Survey
thereof and situate in Hennepin County, Minnesota.
(Torrens Property, Certificate No. 84516)
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4g) Page 3
Title: Wooddale Flats – Second Reading of Ordinance to Rezone Property
And
That portion of the vacated alley in Block 2, “Browndale,” which
lies North of the easterly extension of the North line of Lot 34,
Block 2, “Browndale,” and which lies westerly of a line extending
from a point 7.00 feet easterly from the Southeast corner of Lot 33
in said Block 2, as measured along the easterly extension of the
South line of said Lot 33 and passing through a point equidistant
from the Northeast corner of said Lot 34 and the Northwest corner
of Lot 1 in said Block 2, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
(Abstract property)
from R-2 Single Family Residential to R-4 Multiple Family Residential.
Section 3. The contents of Planning Case File 13-32-Z are hereby entered into and
made part of the public hearing record and the record of decision for this case.
Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect fifteen days after its publication.
First Reading October 7, 2013
Second Reading October 21, 2013
Date of Publication October 31, 2013
Date Ordinance takes effect November 15, 2013
Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council October 21, 2013
City Manager Mayor
Attest: Approved as to Form and Execution:
City Clerk City Attorney
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4g) Page 4
Title: Wooddale Flats – Second Reading of Ordinance to Rezone Property
SUMMARY
ORDINANCE NO.____-13
AN ORDINANCE CHANGING BOUNDARIES OF ZONING DISTRICTS
This ordinance states that zoning districts for 3998 Wooddale Avenue South and 4017 Utica
Avenue South will be changed from R-2 Single Family Residential to R-4 Multiple Family
Residential.
This ordinance shall take effect 15 days after publication.
Adopted by the City Council October 21, 2013
Jeffrey W. Jacobs /s/
Mayor
A copy of the full text of this ordinance is available for inspection with the City Clerk.
Published in St. Louis Park Sailor: October 31, 2013
Wooddale Flats: Zoning District - Existing0 125 250 375 50062.5
Feet
Excelsi
or
Bl
v
d
Wo
o
d
d
a
l
e
A
v
e
Utica AveHwy 10040th St
Toledo Ave41st St Quentin AveMiracle Mile Shopping
Center
Ü
Legend
Zoning District
POS - Parks & Open Space
R1 - Single Family Residential
R2 - Single Family Residential
R3 - Two-Family Residential
R4 - Multiple-Family Residential
RC - High-Density Multiple-Family Residential
MX - Mixed Use
C1 - Neighborhood Commercial
C2 - General Commercial
BP - Business Park
O - Office
IP - Industrial Park
IG - General Industrial
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4g)
Title: Wooddale Flats – Second Reading of Ordinance to Rezone Property Page 5
Wooddale Flats: Zoning District - Proposed0 125 250 375 50062.5
Feet
Excelsior
Blvd
Wo
o
d
d
a
l
e
A
v
e
Utica AveHwy 10040th StToledo Ave41st St Quentin AveMiracle Mile Shopping
Center
Ü
Legend
Zoning District
POS - Parks & Open Space
R1 - Single Family Residential
R2 - Single Family Residential
R3 - Two-Family Residential
R4 - Multiple-Family Residential
RC - High-Density Multiple-Family Residential
MX - Mixed Use
C1 - Neighborhood Commercial
C2 - General Commercial
BP - Business Park
O - Office
IP - Industrial Park
IG - General Industrial
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4g)
Title: Wooddale Flats – Second Reading of Ordinance to Rezone Property Page 6
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: October 21, 2013
Consent Agenda Item: 4h
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE:
Special Assessment – Sewer Service Line Repair at 7325 Minnetonka Boulevard
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution authorizing the special assessment
for the repair of the sewer service line at 7325 Minnetonka Boulevard, St. Louis Park, MN P.I.D.
17-117-21-21-0030.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: The proposed action is consistent with policy previously
established by the City Council.
SUMMARY: Brian Tietz and Shannon Eggebraaten, owners of the single family residence at
7325 Minnetonka Boulevard, have requested the City to authorize the repair of the sewer service
line for their home and assess the cost against the property in accordance with the City’s special
assessment policy.
The City requires the repair of service lines to promote the general public health, safety and welfare
within the community. The special assessment policy for the repair or replacement of water or sewer
service lines for existing homes was adopted by the City Council in 1996. This program was put into
place because sometimes property owners face financial hardships when emergency repairs like this
are unexpectedly required.
Plans and permits for this service line repair work were completed, submitted, and approved by City
staff. The property owners hired a contractor and repaired the sewer service line in compliance with
current codes and regulations. Based on the completed work, this repair qualifies for the City’s
special assessment program. The property owners have petitioned the City to authorize the sewer
service line repair and special assess the cost of the repair. The total eligible cost of the repair has
been determined to be $3,800.00.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The City has funds in place to finance the
cost of this special assessment.
VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution
Prepared by: Jay Hall, Utility Superintendent
Reviewed by: Mark Hanson, Public Works Superintendent
Brian Swanson, Controller
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4h) Page 2
Title: Special Assessment – Sewer Service Line Repair at 7325 Minnetonka Boulevard
RESOLUTION NO. 13-____
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
FOR THE REPAIR OF THE SEWER SERVICE LINE AT
7325 MINNETONKA BOULEVARD, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN
PID 17 -117-21-21-0030
WHEREAS, the Property Owners at 7325 Minnetonka Boulevard have petitioned the
City of St. Louis Park to authorize a special assessment for the repair of the sewer service line
for the single family residence located at 7325 Minnetonka Boulevard, and
WHEREAS, the Property Owners have agreed to waive the right to a public hearing,
right of notice and right of appeal pursuant to Minnesota Statute, Chapter 429; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park has received a report from the
Utility Superintendent related to the repair of the sewer service line.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis
Park, Minnesota, that:
1. The petition from the Property Owners requesting the approval and special assessment for
the sewer service line repair is hereby accepted.
2. The sewer service line repair that was done in conformance with the plans and specifications
approved by the Public Works Department and Department of Inspections is hereby
accepted.
3. The total cost for the repair of the sewer service line is accepted at $3,800.00.
4. The Property Owners have agreed to waive the right to a public hearing, notice and appeal
from the special assessment; whether provided by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, or by
other statutes, or by ordinance, City Charter, the constitution, or common law.
5. The Property Owners have agreed to pay the City for the total cost of the above
improvements through a special assessment over a ten (10) year period at the interest rate of
5.85 %.
6. The Property Owners have executed an agreement with the City and all other documents
necessary to implement the repair of the sewer service line and the special assessment of all
costs associated therewith.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council October 21, 2013
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: October 21, 2013
Consent Agenda Item: 4i
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE:
Special Assessment – Sewer Service Line Repair at 3204 Hampshire Avenue South
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution authorizing the special assessment
for the repair of the sewer service line at 3204 Hampshire Avenue South, St. Louis Park, MN
P.I.D. 17-117-21-13-0002.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: The proposed action is consistent with policy previously
established by the City Council.
SUMMARY: David and Kristine Gustafson, owners of the single family residence at 3204
Hampshire Avenue South, have requested the City to authorize the repair of the sewer service
line for their home and assess the cost against the property in accordance with the City’s special
assessment policy.
The City requires the repair of service lines to promote the general public health, safety and welfare
within the community. The special assessment policy for the repair or replacement of water or sewer
service lines for existing homes was adopted by the City Council in 1996. This program was put into
place because sometimes property owners face financial hardships when emergency repairs like this
are unexpectedly required.
Plans and permits for this service line repair work were completed, submitted, and approved by City
staff. The property owners hired a contractor and repaired the sewer service line in compliance with
current codes and regulations. Based on the completed work, this repair qualifies for the City’s
special assessment program. The property owners have petitioned the City to authorize the sewer
service line repair and special assess the cost of the repair. The total eligible cost of the repair has
been determined to be $3,300.00.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The City has funds in place to finance the
cost of this special assessment.
VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution
Prepared by: Jay Hall, Utility Superintendent
Reviewed by: Mark Hanson, Public Works Superintendent
Brian Swanson, Controller
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4i) Page 2
Title: Special Assessment – Sewer Service Line Repair at 3204 Hampshire Avenue South
RESOLUTION NO. 13-____
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
FOR THE REPAIR OF THE SEWER SERVICE LINE AT
3204 HAMPSHIRE AVENUE SOUTH, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN
P.I.D. 17-117-21-13-0002
WHEREAS, the Property Owners at 3204 Hampshire Avenue South, have petitioned the
City of St. Louis Park to authorize a special assessment for the repair of the sewer service line
for the single family residence located at 3204 Hampshire Avenue South, and
WHEREAS, the Property Owners have agreed to waive the right to a public hearing,
right of notice and right of appeal pursuant to Minnesota Statute, Chapter 429; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park has received a report from the
Utility Superintendent related to the repair of the sewer service line.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis
Park, Minnesota, that:
1. The petition from the Property Owners requesting the approval and special assessment for
the sewer service line repair is hereby accepted.
2. The sewer service line repair that was done in conformance with the plans and specifications
approved by the Public Works Department and Department of Inspections is hereby
accepted.
3. The total cost for the repair of the sewer service line is accepted at $3,300.00.
4. The Property Owners have agreed to waive the right to a public hearing, notice and appeal
from the special assessment; whether provided by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, or by
other statutes, or by ordinance, City Charter, the constitution, or common law.
5. The Property Owners have agreed to pay the City for the total cost of the above
improvements through a special assessment over a ten (10) year period at the interest rate of
5.85 %.
6. The Property Owners have executed an agreement with the City and all other documents
necessary to implement the repair of the sewer service line and the special assessment of all
costs associated therewith.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council October 21, 2013
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: October 21, 2013
Consent Agenda Item: 4j
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Special Assessment – Sewer Service Line Repair at 7705 13th Lane
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution authorizing the special assessment
for the repair of the sewer service line at 7705 13th Lane, St. Louis Park, MN P.I.D. 05-117-21-
32-0055.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: The proposed action is consistent with policy previously
established by the City Council.
SUMMARY: Michael Tils, Sr., owner of the single family residence at 7705 13th Lane, has
requested the City to authorize the repair of the sewer service line for his/her home and assess
the cost against the property in accordance with the City’s special assessment policy.
The City requires the repair of service lines to promote the general public health, safety and welfare
within the community. The special assessment policy for the repair or replacement of water or sewer
service lines for existing homes was adopted by the City Council in 1996. This program was put into
place because sometimes property owners face financial hardships when emergency repairs like this
are unexpectedly required.
Plans and permits for this service line repair work were completed, submitted, and approved by City
staff. The property owner hired a contractor and repaired the sewer service line in compliance with
current codes and regulations. Based on the completed work, this repair qualifies for the City’s
special assessment program. The property owner has petitioned the City to authorize the sewer
service line repair and special assess the cost of the repair. The total eligible cost of the repair has
been determined to be $3,250.00.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The City has funds in place to finance the
cost of this special assessment.
VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution
Prepared by: Jay Hall , Utility Superintendent
Reviewed by: Mark Hanson, Public Works Superintendent
Brian Swanson, Controller
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4j) Page 2
Title: Special Assessment – Sewer Service Line Repair at 7705 13th Lane
RESOLUTION NO. 13-____
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
FOR THE REPAIR OF THE SEWER SERVICE LINE AT
7705 13TH LANE, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN
P.I.D. 05-117-21-32-0055
WHEREAS, the Property Owner at 7705 13th Lane has petitioned the City of St. Louis
Park to authorize a special assessment for the repair of the sewer service line for the single
family residence located at 7705 13th Lane, and
WHEREAS, the Property Owner has agreed to waive the right to a public hearing, right
of notice and right of appeal pursuant to Minnesota Statute, Chapter 429; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park has received a report from the
Utility Superintendent related to the repair of the sewer service line.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis
Park, Minnesota, that:
1. The petition from the Property Owner requesting the approval and special assessment for the
sewer service line repair is hereby accepted.
2. The sewer service line repair that was done in conformance with the plans and specifications
approved by the Public Works Department and Department of Inspections is hereby
accepted.
3. The total cost for the repair of the sewer service line is accepted at $3,250.00.
4. The Property Owner has agreed to waive the right to a public hearing, notice and appeal from
the special assessment; whether provided by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, or by other
statutes, or by ordinance, City Charter, the constitution, or common law.
5. The Property Owner has agreed to pay the City for the total cost of the above improvements
through a special assessment over a ten (10) year period at the interest rate of 5.85 %.
6. The Property Owner has executed an agreement with the City and all other documents
necessary to implement the repair of the sewer service line and the special assessment of all
costs associated therewith.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council October 21, 2013
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: October 21, 2013
Consent Agenda Item: 4k
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Special Assessment - Water Service Line Repair at 1340 Jordan Avenue South
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution authorizing the special assessment
for the repair of the water service line at 1340 Jordan Avenue South, St. Louis Park, MN P.I.D.
01-117-22-41-0009.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: The proposed action is consistent with policy previously
established by the City Council.
SUMMARY: Jeremiah and Paula Jones, owners of the single family residence at 1340 Jordan
Avenue South, have requested the City to authorize the repair of the water service line for their
home and assess the cost against the property in accordance with the City’s special assessment
policy.
The City requires the repair of service lines to promote the general public health, safety and welfare
within the community. The special assessment policy for the repair or replacement of water or sewer
service lines for existing homes was adopted by the City Council in 1996. This program was put into
place because sometimes property owners face financial hardships when emergency repairs like this
are unexpectedly required.
Plans and permits for this service line repair work were completed, submitted, and approved by City
staff. The property owners hired a contractor and repaired the water service line in compliance with
current codes and regulations. Based on the completed work, this repair qualifies for the City’s
special assessment program. The property owners have petitioned the City to authorize the water
service line repair and special assess the cost of the repair. The total eligible cost of the repair has
been determined to be $3,455.00.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The City has funds in place to finance the
cost of this special assessment.
VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution
Prepared by: Jay Hall , Utility Superintendent
Reviewed by: Mark Hanson, Public Works Superintendent
Brian Swanson, Controller
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4k) Page 2
Title: Special Assessment - Water Service Line Repair at 1340 Jordan Avenue South
RESOLUTION NO. 13-____
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
FOR THE REPAIR OF THE WATER SERVICE LINE AT
1340 JORDAN AVENUE SOUTH, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN
P.I.D. 01-117-22-41-0009
WHEREAS, the Property Owners at 1340 Jordan Avenue South have petitioned the City
of St. Louis Park to authorize a special assessment for the repair of the water service line for the
single family residence located at 1340 Jordan Avenue South, and
WHEREAS, the Property Owners have agreed to waive the right to a public hearing,
right of notice and right of appeal pursuant to Minnesota Statute, Chapter 429; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park has received a report from the
Utility Superintendent related to the repair of the water service line.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis
Park, Minnesota, that:
1. The petition from the Property Owners requesting the approval and special assessment for
the water service line repair is hereby accepted.
2. The water service line repair that was done in conformance with the plans and specifications
approved by the Public Works Department and Department of Inspections is hereby
accepted.
3. The total cost for the repair of the water service line is accepted at $3,455.00.
4. The Property Owners have agreed to waive the right to a public hearing, notice and appeal
from the special assessment; whether provided by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, or by
other statutes, or by ordinance, City Charter, the constitution, or common law.
5. The Property Owners have agreed to pay the City for the total cost of the above
improvements through a special assessment over a ten (10) year period at the interest rate of
5.85 %.
6. The Property Owners have executed an agreement with the City and all other documents
necessary to implement the repair of the water service line and the special assessment of all
costs associated therewith.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council October 21, 2013
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: October 21, 2013
Consent Agenda Item: 4l
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Special Assessment – Water Service Line Repair at 2500 Xylon Avenue South
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution authorizing the special assessment
for the repair of the water service line at 2500 Xylon Avenue South, St. Louis Park, MN P.I.D.
07-117-21-42-0031.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: The proposed action is consistent with policy previously
established by the City Council.
SUMMARY: Sean Robb, owner of the single family residence at 2500 Xylon Avenue South,
has requested the City to authorize the repair of the water service line for his home and assess the
cost against the property in accordance with the City’s special assessment policy.
The City requires the repair of service lines to promote the general public health, safety and welfare
within the community. The special assessment policy for the repair or replacement of water or sewer
service lines for existing homes was adopted by the City Council in 1996. This program was put into
place because sometimes property owners face financial hardships when emergency repairs like this
are unexpectedly required.
Plans and permits for this service line repair work were completed, submitted, and approved by City
staff. The property owner hired a contractor and repaired the water service line in compliance with
current codes and regulations. Based on the completed work, this repair qualifies for the City’s
special assessment program. The property owner has petitioned the City to authorize the water service
line repair and special assess the cost of the repair. The total eligible cost of the repair has been
determined to be $3,880.00.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The City has funds in place to finance the
cost of this special assessment.
VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution
Prepared by: Jay Hall, Utility Superintendent
Reviewed by: Mark Hanson, Public Works Superintendent
Brian Swanson, Controller
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4l) Page 2
Title: Special Assessment – Water Service Line Repair at 2500 Xylon Avenue South
RESOLUTION NO. 13-____
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
FOR THE REPAIR OF THE WATER SERVICE LINE AT
2500 XYLON AVENUE SOUTH, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN
P.I.D. 07-117-21-42-0031
WHEREAS, the Property Owner at 2500 Xylon Avenue South has petitioned the City of
St. Louis Park to authorize a special assessment for the repair of the water service line for the
single family residence located at 2500 Xylon Avenue South, and
WHEREAS, the Property Owner has agreed to waive the right to a public hearing, right
of notice and right of appeal pursuant to Minnesota Statute, Chapter 429; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park has received a report from the
Utility Superintendent related to the repair of the water service line.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis
Park, Minnesota, that:
1. The petition from the Property Owner requesting the approval and special assessment for the
water service line repair is hereby accepted.
2. The water service line repair that was done in conformance with the plans and specifications
approved by the Public Works Department and Department of Inspections is hereby
accepted.
3. The total cost for the repair of the water service line is accepted at $3,880.00.
4. The Property Owner has agreed to waive the right to a public hearing, notice and appeal from
the special assessment; whether provided by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, or by other
statutes, or by ordinance, City Charter, the constitution, or common law.
5. The Property Owner has agreed to pay the City for the total cost of the above improvements
through a special assessment over a ten (10) year period at the interest rate of 5.85 %.
6. The Property Owner has executed an agreement with the City and all other documents
necessary to implement the repair of the water service line and the special assessment of all
costs associated therewith.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council October 21, 2013
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: October 21, 2013
Consent Agenda Item: 4m
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Agreement with Hennepin County Sentencing to Serve (STS) Program, 2014 - 2015
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to approve entering into a service agreement with the
Hennepin County Department of Corrections for continuing to use their crews from the
Sentencing to Service Program (STS Program).
POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish to continue an agreement with the
Hennepin County Department of Corrections to purchase services from the Sentencing to Service
Program (STS Program)?
SUMMARY: In the past, three departments within the City each had separate contracts with the
Hennepin County Corrections Department for services including janitorial services, litter pick
up, hand mowing, cleaning dasher boards at the Rec Center, buck thorn removal and other lower
level maintenance from the Sentencing to Service Program (STS Program). The City of St.
Louis Park has had contracts with Hennepin County for the use of the STS crews for more than
15 years and the program has been very successful for the City. The crews are able to assist our
staff with many lower level maintenance items that we are unable to accomplish in a timely and
cost effective fashion.
To simplify contracts, the contacts are now combined into one contract.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The two year contract will be in effect
January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2015 and shall not exceed $144,102.40 plus applicable
tax. A payment of $72,051.20 will be submitted to the County in 2014 and $72,051.20 will be
submitted in 2015. This is a budget item included in the Operations and Recreation budget.
VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged
community.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Contract
Prepared by: Stacy Voelker, Administrative Secretary
Rick Beane, Park Superintendent
Reviewed by: Cindy Walsh, Director of Operations and Recreation
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4m)
Title: Agreement with Hennepin County Sentencing to Serve (STS) Program, 2014 - 2015 Page 2
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4m)
Title: Agreement with Hennepin County Sentencing to Serve (STS) Program, 2014 - 2015 Page 3
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4m)
Title: Agreement with Hennepin County Sentencing to Serve (STS) Program, 2014 - 2015 Page 4
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4m)
Title: Agreement with Hennepin County Sentencing to Serve (STS) Program, 2014 - 2015 Page 5
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4m)
Title: Agreement with Hennepin County Sentencing to Serve (STS) Program, 2014 - 2015 Page 6
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4m)
Title: Agreement with Hennepin County Sentencing to Serve (STS) Program, 2014 - 2015 Page 7
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4m)
Title: Agreement with Hennepin County Sentencing to Serve (STS) Program, 2014 - 2015 Page 8
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: October 21, 2013
Consent Agenda Item: 4n
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Final Payment Resolution - Contract 33-13 Allied Blacktop Company – Project No.
2013-0001
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution authorizing final payment in the
amount of $15,846.74 for the 2013 Sealcoat Project with Allied Blacktop Company - Project No.
2013-0001, City Contract No. 33-13.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish to approve this final contract
payment?
SUMMARY: City Council approved undertaking the 2013 Sealcoat Project– City Project No.
2013-0001. The project was advertised, bid and awarded to Allied Blacktop Company on April
15, 2013 in the amount of $289,609.91. This project included sealcoating selected streets in
Pavement Management Area 5 which comprises the neighborhoods of Aquila, Cobblecrest,
Minnehaha, Amhurst, and South Oak Hill neighborhoods.
The Contractor completed this work within the contract time allowed (10 days) at a final contract
cost of $280,735.97. The project had underruns amounting to $8,873.94.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The cost for this project was accounted for
in the 2013 capital budget. The work on local streets will be paid for using the Pavement
Management Fund. Municipal State Aid streets that are sealcoated will be paid from the Public
Works Operations budget.
VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution
Prepared by: Kyle Johnson, Project Engineer
Reviewed by: Debra Heiser, Engineering Director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4n) Page 2
Title: Final Payment Resolution - Contract 33-13 Allied Blacktop Company – Project No. 2013-0001
RESOLUTION NO. 13-____
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING FINAL PAYMENT IN THE
AMOUNT OF $15,846.74 FOR THE 2013 CITY SEALCOAT PROJECT
WITH ALLIED BLACKTOP COMPANY ACCEPTING WORK ON
CONTRACT SEALCOATING
CITY PROJECT NO. 2013-0001
CONTRACT NO. 33-13
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, as
follows:
1. Pursuant to a written contract with the City dated April 15, 2013, Allied Blacktop
Company has satisfactorily completed the contract sealcoating, as per Contract No. 33-
13.
2. The Engineering Director has filed her recommendations for final acceptance of the
work.
3. The work completed under this contract is accepted and approved. The City Manager is
directed to make final payment on the contract, taking the contractor's receipt in full.
Original Contract Price $289,609.91
Underruns $ 8,873.94
Contract Amount $280,735.97
Previous Payments $264,889.23
Balance Due $ 15,846.74
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council October 21, 2013
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: October 21, 2013
Consent Agenda Item: 4o
MINUTES
ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY COMMISSION: SUSTAINABLE SLP
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
August 7, 2013
BRICK HOUSE
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chris Anderson, Tim Brausen, Mark Eilers, Terry Gipps, Caitlin
Glennon, Rachel Harris, Tom Hillstrom, Mary Karius, Cindy
Larson O’Neil, Renee McGarvey, Alex Sundvall, Judy Voigt
MEMBERS ABSENT: Whitney Thesing
STAFF PRESENT: Cindy Walsh and Bridget Gothberg
CONSULTANTS: Mike Lamb, Fred Rozumalski Barr Engineering Company
1. The meeting was called to order at 5:05 p.m. by Ms. Gothberg.
2. Approval of July 17, 2013 Meeting Minutes
It was moved by Chris Anderson and seconded by Tom Hillstrom to approve the minutes as
presented. Motion passed 12-0
3. Unfinished Business
a. By-laws
It was moved by Chris Anderson and seconded by Tom Hillstrom to approve the by-laws.
Motion passed 12-0.
b. Norms and Guidelines
A sample of “Norms and Guidelines” was shared with the Commission. Commissioners
agreed to review the sample and be prepared to finalize the norms at the next meeting.
c. Election of Officers
It was moved by Tom Hillstrom and seconded by Mary Karius to accept the slate of Tim
Brausen as Chair and Renee McGarvey as Vice Chair. Motion passed 12-0.
The new officers will fill their terms from September, 2013, until the first or second
meeting in 2014, at which time the new officers will be selected.
4. New Business
a. Mike Lamb and Fred Rozumalski facilitated an exercise with the Commissioners to start
gathering ideas for a work plan and direction for the Commission. The following three
statements were worked on:
o I see a sustainable St. Louis Park that is______________________________
o The direction of the Commission is to______________________________
o How can we make St. Louis Park more sustainable?
Two small groups worked on these questions. Following the small groups, a large group
reported the findings. There were collective ideas. Mr. Lamb and Mr. Rozumalski will
take all of the findings, analyze them, look at commonalities and bring them back for the
next meeting.
5. Communications
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4o) Page 2
Title: Environment and Sustainability Commission: Sustainable SLP Meeting Minutes of August 7, 2013
• September 4, 2013, 5:00-6:30 pm is the next meeting. Ms. Walsh will see if the Brick
House is available and will include the meeting site in the agenda packet for the next
meeting.
• The Commissioners discussed the possibility of having longer meetings.
• There was some concern over getting the work plan done and not knowing the depth and
breadth of what the City of St. Louis Park is doing and what other cities are doing. There
were also questions about Green Step and what areas have been done in SLP. Ms.
Walsh shared with the Commission that learning about SLP and other cities could be a
part of their work plan. This is a normal way for a new commission to start. Ms. Walsh
said that she would send out the latest Green Step information to the Commission.
6. Miscellaneous
• Homework before the September Meeting
o Study the “Norms and Guidelines” Sample and come prepared to finalize norms
for the Commission
o Come prepared to talk about having longer meetings (i.e., 2-3 hours)
o Read the Green Step information
7. The meeting was adjourned at 6:35 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Bridget Gothberg
Organizational Development Coordinator & Staff Liaison
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: October 21, 2013
Consent Agenda Item: 4p
MINUTES
ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY COMMISSIONS: SUSTAINABLE SLP
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
September 11, 2013
BRICK HOUSE
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chris Anderson, Tim Brausen, Mark Eilers, Terry Gipps, Caitlin
Glennon, Rachel Harris, Mary Karius, Cindy Larson O’Neil, Renee
McGarvey, Alex Sundvall, Whitney Thesing, Judy Voigt
MEMBERS ABSENT: Tom Hillstrom
STAFF PRESENT: Bridget Gothberg
CONSULTANTS: Mike Lamb, Fred Rozumalski, Barr Engineering Company
1. The meeting was called to order at 5:02 p.m. by Chair Brausen.
2. The minutes of the August 7, 2013 meeting were approved.
3. Unfinished Business
a. Finalize Norms and Guidelines: It was moved by Terry Gipps and seconded by
Mark Eilers to adopt the Norms as a guideline for how the Commission works
together. Motion adopted.
b. Meeting length was discussed. It was a healthy discussion. Some members felt
that keeping the meetings to 90 minutes helped them to focus on the job at hand
and not diverge from the topics. Others were concerned about not having enough
time to learn what is already happening at the City; to understand what other
entities do around Environment and Sustainability; to develop the work plan; and
to start making a difference. It was moved by Mary Karius and seconded by
Rachel Harris that for the next two meetings (October 2 and November 6) the
Commission would meet for two hours, from 7:00-9:00 p.m. Motion adopted.
4. New Business
a. Work on Step II of Work Plan exercise from last meeting
b. Green Step Discussion
c. Next Steps on Work Plan
Fred Rozumalski and Mike Lamb explained their handout regarding the Q and A
exercise of last meeting on the Meaning of Sustainability, Direction of the
Commission, and Making St. Louis Park Sustainable.
The Commissioners talked about the diagram of key information, combined with
how the Commission should operate, how to be effective and using all that
information to give direction for the work plan. The areas they agreed include:
i. Commission education
ii. Work group identification
iii. Schedule for completing activities
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4p) Page 2
Title: Environment and Sustainability Commission: Sustainable SLP Meeting Minutes September 11, 2013
Then the Commissioners reviewed the Q & A exercise, the Green Steps summary,
and the Green Steps categories comparison matrix.
They also went around the room to “survey” work group topics. The outcome
was: Alternative energy – 3, Water Quality – 2, Organics Recycling, Native
Plants/Habitat, Green Building Code, Vision for a Sustainable City, Bikes and
Walking, Green Food Packaging, Education and Green Practices
This led to a general agreement to the work plan outline and having staff from the
city (Jim Vaughn) and the Green Steps Cities (Phil Muessig).
5. Communications
a. Rachel Harris shared information with Bridget Gothberg, who brought it to the
meeting.
http://wrc.umn.edu/news/PreparingMinnesotaforClimateChangeAConferenceonCl
imateAdaptation/
6. The meeting was adjourned at 6:35.
Respectfully submitted,
Bridget Gothberg
Organizational Development Coordinator & Staff Liaison
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: October 21, 2013
Consent Agenda Item: 4q
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Vendor Claims
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to accept for filing Vendor Claims for the period
September 28 through October 11, 2013.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
SUMMARY: The Finance Department prepares this report on a monthly basis for Council’s
review.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Vendor Claims
Prepared by: Connie Neubeck, Account Clerk
10/16/2013CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:20:10R55CKSUMLOG23000VO
1Page -Council Check Summary
10/11/2013 -9/28/2013
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
164.42ORGANIZED REC G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CARABERNATHY, LISA
164.42
2,030.63GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORYADVANCED GRAPHIX INC
130.63-GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTS
1,900.00
120.58OPERATIONSOPERATIONAL SUPPLIESAIRGAS NORTH CENTRAL
120.58
34.38-GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTSALL TRAFFIC SOLUTIONS
534.38POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
500.00
575.00OPERATIONSGENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESAMERICAN TEST CENTER INC
700.00PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
1,275.00
514.15GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORYAMERICAN TIRE DISTRIBUTORS
514.15
3,965.06SOLID WASTE G&A PRINTING & PUBLISHINGANDERBERG INNOVATIVE PRINT SOL
3,965.06
200.00ADULT PROGRAMS GENERAL SUPPLIESANDERSEN INC, EARL
375.25SPECIAL EVENTS GENERAL SUPPLIES
200.00PLAYGROUNDSGENERAL SUPPLIES
350.00YOUTH PROGRAMS GENERAL SUPPLIES
200.00REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES
1,325.25
87.45STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICEAQUA CITY IRRIGATION
87.45
886.67GENERAL CUSTODIAL DUTIES OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESARAMARK UNIFORM CORP ACCTS
67.42ENTERPRISE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
954.09
1,382.66FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICEATIR ELECTRIC CORPORATION
1,382.66
65.79GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEAUTOMOBILE SERVICE
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4q)
Title: Vendor Claims Page 2
10/16/2013CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:20:10R55CKSUMLOG23000VO
2Page -Council Check Summary
10/11/2013 -9/28/2013
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
65.79
32.33HUMAN RESOURCES RECOGNITIONAVEX LLC
32.33
181.50WATER UTILITY G&A TRAININGAWWA
181.50
360.00PATCHING-PERMANENT OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESBARTON SAND & GRAVEL CO
120.00SEWER UTILITY G&A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE
480.00
875.00SOCCEROTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESBATRES, JULIO
875.00
187.01OPERATIONSOPERATIONAL SUPPLIESBATTERIES PLUS
90.73WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES
277.74
602.78ARENA MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEBECKER ARENA PRODUCTS
602.78
8,555.00PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDIBORMANN CONSTRUCTION INC
8,555.00
3,615.00CE MATERIALS TESTING ENGINEERING SERVICESBRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION
3,615.00
480.86ROUTINE MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESBRO TEX INC
402.49WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES
883.35
96.16REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESBURKE, CAROLYN
96.16
285.50GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEC&E AUTO UPHOLSTERY
285.50
1.25-ORGANIZED REC G & A INTEREST/FINANCE CHARGESCAPITAL ONE COMMERCIAL
31.36ADULTS 18 - 54 GENERAL SUPPLIES
30.11
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4q)
Title: Vendor Claims Page 3
10/16/2013CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:20:10R55CKSUMLOG23000VO
3Page -Council Check Summary
10/11/2013 -9/28/2013
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
1,265.40IT G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICECARTRIDGE CARE
1,265.40
1,273.27TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENTCDW GOVERNMENT INC
1,273.27
10,956.98DISCOUNT LOAN PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESCENTER ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT
1,310.00MOVE-UP PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
25,000.00TRANSFORMATION LOAN OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
420.00CES Resid Energy Conservation OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
37,686.98
449.68FACILITY OPERATIONS HEATING GASCENTERPOINT ENERGY
25.17SEWER UTILITY G&A HEATING GAS
474.85
10,200.00EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S OTHER RETIREMENTCENTRAL PENSION FUND
10,200.00
1,891.69PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESCENTRAL WOOD PRODUCTS
1,891.69
36.00INSPECTIONS G & A PLUMBINGCHAMPION PLUMBING
36.00
10,000.00ESCROWSDEMO / BROOKSIDE TRAFFICCHURCH OF THE HOLY FAMILY
10,000.00
109.60FACILITIES MCTE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIESCINTAS CORPORATION
163.84WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
113.50AQUATIC PARK BUDGET OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
170.32VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
557.26
129.16-GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTSCITIZENS INDEPENDENT BANK
195.00ADMINISTRATION G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
29.51ADMINISTRATION G & A MEETING EXPENSE
61.18IT G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
375.00IT G & A TRAINING
20.38POLICE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
58.20OPERATIONSOFFICE SUPPLIES
1,167.80OPERATIONSGENERAL SUPPLIES
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4q)
Title: Vendor Claims Page 4
10/16/2013CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:20:10R55CKSUMLOG23000VO
4Page -Council Check Summary
10/11/2013 -9/28/2013
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
714.06OPERATIONSOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
50.00OPERATIONSTRAINING
268.38PUBLIC WORKS G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
536.76ENGINEERING G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
245.00SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
536.76PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
13.63-STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
134.19WATER UTILITY G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
129.94WATER UTILITY G&A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
645.00SOLID WASTE G&A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
55.48-CAPITAL REPLACEMENT B/S DUE TO OTHER GOVTS
910.73TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT
224.08TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT
134.22ORGANIZED REC G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
133.36WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
814.15WESTWOOD G & A OFFICE EQUIPMENT
1,110.65HALLOWEEN PARTY GENERAL SUPPLIES
8,296.08
20,344.39ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL SERVICESCOLICH & ASSOCIATES
20,344.39
85.56WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESCOMCAST
9.04BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
94.60
23,130.07SEALCOAT PREPARATION OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESCOMMERCIAL ASPHALT COMPANY
290.98PATCHING-PERMANENT OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
23,421.05
250.00TRAININGTRAININGCOMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION
250.00
507.58REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIESCONTINENTAL RESEARCH CORP
507.58
8,962.75GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESCOVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES
8,962.75
3.92-GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTSCREATIVE PRODUCT SOURCING INC
60.92DARE PROGRAM OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
57.00
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4q)
Title: Vendor Claims Page 5
10/16/2013CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:20:10R55CKSUMLOG23000VO
5Page -Council Check Summary
10/11/2013 -9/28/2013
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
32,748.19MUNICIPAL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDICUMMINS NPOWER LLC
496.97VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
33,245.16
100.59REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESCURRAN-BAKKEN, ERIC
100.59
3,800.00SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICED&T AND SON EXCAVATING
3,800.00
6,042.29INSPECTIONS G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTSDEPT LABOR & INDUSTRY
6,042.29
262.48ENTERPRISE G & A ADVERTISINGDEX MEDIA EAST LLC
262.48
7,077.22POSTAL SERVICES POSTAGEDO-GOOD.BIZ INC
7,077.22
187.32WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERSDONLON, WILLIAM
187.32
5,390.00STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICEDRYDEN EXCAVATING INC
5,390.00
9,448.85SYSTEM REPAIR OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESEGAN COMPANIES INC
9,448.85
169.50REC CENTER BUILDING MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAREISOLD, JASON
169.50
170.50INSPECTIONS G & A BUILDINGELDER-JONES BUILDING PERMIT SE
170.50
288.95SOLID WASTE G&A MEETING EXPENSEELLINGSON, JUDY
288.95
419.48GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORYEMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOG
419.48
29.87OPERATIONSOPERATIONAL SUPPLIESEMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4q)
Title: Vendor Claims Page 6
10/16/2013CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:20:10R55CKSUMLOG23000VO
6Page -Council Check Summary
10/11/2013 -9/28/2013
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
29.87
3,175.12ENGINEERING G & A RENTAL EQUIPMENTENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR
3,175.12
34,855.55SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS RECYCLING SERVICEEUREKA RECYCLING
34,855.55
167.13GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORYFACTORY MOTOR PARTS CO
148.51GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES
315.64
44.29HUMAN RESOURCES RECRUITMENTFEDEX
44.29
2,562.39WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICEFERGUSON WATERWORKS
2,562.39
128.00HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESFIRST ADVANTAGE LNS SCREENING
128.00
663.92WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESFISCHER MINING LLC
663.92
850.00COMMUNICATIONS/GV REIMBURSEABL GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESFISCHLER & ASSOCIATES PA
850.00
200.00EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESFLEX COMPENSATION INC
200.00
175.00GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESFLYNN, JUDITH
175.00
18,948.94GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORYFORKLIFTS OF MN INC.
18,948.94
135.33GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET CLEARING ACCOUNTFREEMAN, RONALD
135.33
12,340.75-STREET CAPITAL PROJ BAL SHEET RETAINED PERCENTAGEG L CONTRACTING INC
246,814.97CONSTRUCTION PAYMENTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
234,474.22
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4q)
Title: Vendor Claims Page 7
10/16/2013CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:20:10R55CKSUMLOG23000VO
7Page -Council Check Summary
10/11/2013 -9/28/2013
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
1,197.50REC CENTER BUILDING EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEGARTNER REFRIG & MFG INC
1,197.50
300.00SOFTBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESGHIZONI, DAVE
300.00
1,178.10WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICEGOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC
1,178.10
150.00FINANCE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSGOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS AS
150.00
53.58GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORYGRAINGER INC, WW
53.58
700.00TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEGRANICUS INC
700.00
1,245.00PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSGREAT LAKES WEATHER SERVICE
1,245.00
1,480.00WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICEGROTH SEWER & WATER
1,480.00
207.13WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIESHACH CO
207.13
459.00SOFTBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESHAMILTON, MIKE
459.00
1,325.00PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A TRAININGHAMLINE UNIVERSITY
1,325.00
1,785.00SOFTBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESHANUS, BRENT
1,785.00
401.86POLICE G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTATHARCEY, MICHAEL
401.86
3,556.45WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIESHAWKINS INC
3,556.45
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4q)
Title: Vendor Claims Page 8
10/16/2013CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:20:10R55CKSUMLOG23000VO
8Page -Council Check Summary
10/11/2013 -9/28/2013
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
882.22PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDIHEDBERG AGGREGATES
882.22
230.86FINANCE G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTATHEINTZ, STEVEN
138.99FINANCE G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR
369.85
119.50ASSESSING G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSHENNEPIN COUNTY TAXPAYER SERVI
119.50
25.00HUMAN RESOURCES TRAININGHENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
534.38IT G & A COMPUTER SERVICES
4,845.72POLICE G & A SUBSISTENCE SERVICE
283.06PARK MAINTENANCE G & A TRAINING
5,688.16
3,108.33GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE OTHERHENRICKSEN PSG
3,108.33
38.00SUPPORT SERVICES TRAININGHINZ, TODD
38.00
119.84WATER UTILITY G&A BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIESHIRSHFIELDS
119.84
55.05ROUTINE MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESHOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
52.40PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
135.60SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
243.05
250.00SOFTBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESHORDYK, EVAN
250.00
466.51BLDG/GROUNDS OPS & MAINT BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIESHOTSY OF MN
466.51
76.50SOFTBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESHOWES, JEFFREY
76.50
50.00KICKBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESHOWES, JENNIFER
50.00
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4q)
Title: Vendor Claims Page 9
10/16/2013CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:20:10R55CKSUMLOG23000VO
9Page -Council Check Summary
10/11/2013 -9/28/2013
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
100.00KICKBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESHOWES, KRISTINE
204.00SOFTBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
304.00
520.00PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDIHRGREEN
600.00TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT
1,120.00
57.18SPEC ASSMT CONSTRUCTION OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESHUBER UNIVERSAL SERVICES LLC
57.18
45.00VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSIATN
45.00
577.12STORM CLEAN UP OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESINDEPENDENT BLACK DIRT CO
577.12
3,479.03GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEINVER GROVE FORD
3,479.03
39.33WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIESJERRY'S HARDWARE
15.63PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
54.96
100.00ENGINEERING G & A PUBLIC WORKSJOE'S SEWER SERVICE INC
3,250.00SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
3,350.00
961.23IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIESJOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES/LESCO
961.23
140.00INSPECTIONS G & A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCEJOHNSON ASSET MGMT LLC, G
140.00
95.85REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESJOHNSON, JERRY
95.85
300.00KICKBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESJOHNSON, SUSAN
300.00
528.46EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S WAGE GARNISHMENTSKELLER, JASMINE Z
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4q)
Title: Vendor Claims Page 10
10/16/2013CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:20:10R55CKSUMLOG23000VO
10Page -Council Check Summary
10/11/2013 -9/28/2013
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
528.46
400.00PRE-SCHOOL PROGRAMS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESKIDCREATE STUDIO
400.00
500.00NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESKILMER POND HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIA
500.00
3,352.50ESCROWSGENERALKIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, IN
3,352.50
275.00NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESKRUSE, JENNIFER
275.00
15.86PARK MAINTENANCE G & A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESLAKES GAS CO
15.86
236.88GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORYLARSON COMPANIES LTD INC, WD
236.88
76.76REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESLARSON, DAN
76.76
490.44SYSTEM REPAIR OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESLARSON, JH CO
490.44
42.29WATER UTILITY G&A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTATLAUMANN, JOHN
42.29
24.78VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIESLAWSON PRODUCTS INC
24.78
112,368.25UNINSURED LOSS B/S PREPAID EXPENSESLEAGUE OF MN CITIES INSURANCE
112,368.25
64.35CABLE TV G & A OFFICE EQUIPMENTLEWIS, MISTY
64.35
293.30SUPPORT SERVICES G&A OFFICE SUPPLIESLIBERTY ENVELOPE
293.30
39,450.14REILLY G & A LEGAL SERVICESLOCKRIDGE GRINDAL NAUEN PLLP
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4q)
Title: Vendor Claims Page 11
10/16/2013CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:20:10R55CKSUMLOG23000VO
11Page -Council Check Summary
10/11/2013 -9/28/2013
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
39,450.14
2,450.25TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENTLOGIS
2,450.25
198.69ORGANIZED REC G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CARLOMBARDI, JIM
198.69
238.76SSD 2 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESMAPLE CREST LANDSCAPE
224.44SSD #5 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
152.05SSD #6 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
615.25
100.46VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIESMATHESON TRI-GAS INC
100.46
26.59DAMAGE REPAIR OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESMENARDS
71.24PAINTINGOTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
74.83IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
121.07WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
293.73
316,652.43OPERATIONSCLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICEMETROPOLITAN COUNCIL
316,652.43
794.00POLICE G & A TRAININGMHSRC/RANGE
2,374.00JAG GRANT 2010 TRAINING
3,168.00
754.17BLDG/GROUNDS OPS & MAINT BUILDING MTCE SERVICEMIDWEST OVERHEAD CRANE CORP
754.17
1,219.50WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESMIDWEST TESTING LLC
1,219.50
119.23EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S ACCRUED OTHER BENEFITSMINNESOTA BENEFIT ASSOC
119.23
1,994.54GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET CLEARING ACCOUNTMINNESOTA DEPT COMMERCE
1,994.54
32.00WATER UTILITY G&A LICENSESMINNESOTA DEPT HEALTH
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4q)
Title: Vendor Claims Page 12
10/16/2013CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:20:10R55CKSUMLOG23000VO
12Page -Council Check Summary
10/11/2013 -9/28/2013
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
32.00
16.00EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S ACCRUED OTHER BENEFITSMINNESOTA NCPERS LIFE INS
16.00
355.00SEWER UTILITY G&A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTATMINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AG
355.00
225.00WATER UTILITY G&A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTATMINNESOTA RURAL WATER ASSOC
225.00
389.03SUPPORT SERVICES G&A OFFICE SUPPLIESMINUTEMAN PRESS
389.03
55,000.00UNINSURED LOSS G&A UNINSURED LOSSMONTGOMERY BRINKMAN LLC
55,000.00
52.94-PARK IMPROVE BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTSMOST DEPENDABLE FOUNTAINS
822.94PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES
770.00
1,205.24GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORYNAPA (GENUINE PARTS CO)
194.45GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES
1,399.69
338.00GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICENATL AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER CO
338.00
1,725.00SOFTBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESNEUMANN, NEAL
1,725.00
500.00POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESOAK KNOLL ANIMAL HOSPITAL
500.00
298.89WESTWOOD G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAROESTREICH, MARK
298.89
561.45POLICE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIESOFFICE DEPOT
53.99POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
118.70PUBLIC WORKS G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
14.09WATER UTILITY G&A OFFICE SUPPLIES
748.23
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4q)
Title: Vendor Claims Page 13
10/16/2013CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:20:10R55CKSUMLOG23000VO
13Page -Council Check Summary
10/11/2013 -9/28/2013
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
2,598.36INSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESOFFICE TEAM
2,598.36
160.61REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESOLSON, ROBERT
160.61
169,250.00ESCROWSGENERALOPPIDAN INVESTMENT COMPANY
169,250.00
1,343.95TREE REPLACEMENT TREE REPLACEMENTOUT BACK NURSERY
1,343.95
1,603.13SOLID WASTE G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESPARK NICOLLET/METHODIST HOSPIT
1,603.13
1,646.32REC CENTER BUILDING EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEPBBS EQUIPMENT CORP
1,646.32
101.53SOLID WASTE G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIESPLASTIC BAGMART
101.53
208.66REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESPRANGE, DAVID
208.66
8,676.36TREE DISEASE PUBLIC CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICEPRECISION LANDSCAPE & TREE
8,676.36
2,397.90GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEPREMIER FLEET SERVICES
2,397.90
905.00DIAL-A-RIDE PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESPRISM EXPRESS MANAGER
905.00
5,702.25WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICEQ3 CONTRACTING
3,029.51STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
8,731.76
320.00HALLOWEEN PARTY OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESRAINBOW PARTY ARTS
320.00
2,799.39FACILITY OPERATIONS GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICERANDY'S SANITATION INC
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4q)
Title: Vendor Claims Page 14
10/16/2013CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:20:10R55CKSUMLOG23000VO
14Page -Council Check Summary
10/11/2013 -9/28/2013
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
993.20SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE
1,232.99REC CENTER BUILDING GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE
5,025.58
105.00SOCCEROTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESRASYAEV, IGOR
105.00
50.42POLICE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIESREGENCY OFFICE PRODUCTS LLC
50.42
69.92REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESRICHMOND, JULIE
69.92
3,293.41IT G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICERICOH USA INC
3,293.41
914.74GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORYRMS RENTALS
914.74
62.18GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORYROSENBAUER SOUTH DAKOTA LLC
4.00-GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTS
58.18
273.00ADMINISTRATION G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPSROTARY CLUB OF SLP
273.00
750.26STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICEROYAL CONCRETE PIPE INC
750.26
200.00GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESRUSSELL, KIRK
200.00
2,115.56SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESSCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO.
2,115.56
375.00HALLOWEEN PARTY OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESSEIFERT, JIM
375.00
417.50GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESSHAPIN, RYAN
417.50
181.95GRAFFITI CONTROL OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESSHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4q)
Title: Vendor Claims Page 15
10/16/2013CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:20:10R55CKSUMLOG23000VO
15Page -Council Check Summary
10/11/2013 -9/28/2013
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
181.95
20.00ADMINISTRATION G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICESSHRED-IT USA MINNEAPOLIS
10.00FINANCE G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
50.00POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
80.00
325.00SOFTBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESSMITH, PERRY
325.00
1,174.56PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDISNYDER ELECTRIC
1,174.56
.40-FACILITIES MCTE G & A BANK CHARGES/CREDIT CD FEESSPS COMPANIES INC
57.23PLUMBING MTCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES
56.83
1,258.03CE INSPECTION IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDISRF CONSULTING GROUP INC
1,258.03
3,856.99PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDIST CROIX REC CO
3,856.99
5,950.81TREE DISEASE PRIVATE CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICEST CROIX TREE SERVICE INC
5,950.81
229.50ADULT PROGRAMS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESST LOUIS PARK COMMUNITY EDUCAT
229.50
18,000.00HOUSING AUTHORITY OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESST LOUIS PARK HOUSING AUTHORIT
18,000.00
318.55PATCHING-PERMANENT OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESST PAUL, CITY OF
318.55
147.37POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIESSTREICHER'S
109.38OPERATIONSOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
256.75
104.42GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICESUBURBAN CHEVROLET
104.42
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4q)
Title: Vendor Claims Page 16
10/16/2013CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:20:10R55CKSUMLOG23000VO
16Page -Council Check Summary
10/11/2013 -9/28/2013
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
1,524.04GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORYSUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE
1,524.04
6.61-GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTSSUNDBERG CO, CE
102.85GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
96.24
300.00WATER UTILITY G&A TRAININGSUSA
300.00
25.64POLICE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIESTARGET BANK
25.64
66.75REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESTARNOWSKI, ELIZABETH
66.75
450.00SOFTBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESTHOMPSON, JAMES
450.00
4,285.00PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDITHOR GUARD INC
4,285.00
518.16ADMINISTRATION G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESTIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL
518.16
216.12GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORYTITAN MACHINERY
216.12
1,580.00OFF-LEASH DOG PARK OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESTOWN & COUNTRY FENCE INC
1,580.00
967.35GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORYTRI STATE BOBCAT
967.35
231.44WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERSTSCHIDA, DENISE
231.44
127.63GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICETWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO
127.63
1,328.88GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURESUHL CO INC
1,328.88
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4q)
Title: Vendor Claims Page 17
10/16/2013CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:20:10R55CKSUMLOG23000VO
17Page -Council Check Summary
10/11/2013 -9/28/2013
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
150.00EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S WAGE GARNISHMENTSUNITED STATES TREASURY
150.00
204.00EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S UNITED WAYUNITED WAY OF MINNEAPOLIS AREA
204.00
187.86KICKBALLGENERAL SUPPLIESUNIVERSAL ATHLETIC
187.86
2.41-GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTSUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
37.41TREE MAINTENANCE SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
35.00
120.00POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESUNO DOS TRES COMMUNICATIONS
120.00
161.59WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIESUSA BLUE BOOK
423.12STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
584.71
1,500.00ESCROWSPMC ESCROWUTOFT, LORRI
1,500.00
507.90HUMAN RESOURCES RECOGNITIONVAIL, LORI
507.90
601.26WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICEVALLEY-RICH CO INC
601.26
99.44ENVIRONMENTAL G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CARVAUGHAN, JIM
99.44
20.00HUMAN RESOURCES RECRUITMENTVERIFIED CREDENTIALS
20.00
74.16COMMUNICATIONS/GV REIMBURSEABL TELEPHONEVERIZON WIRELESS
50.04SEWER UTILITY G&A TELEPHONE
3,302.70CELLPHONES, IPADS, ETC.OFFICE EQUIPMENT
3,426.90
274.08WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICEWATER CONSERVATION SERVICE INC
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4q)
Title: Vendor Claims Page 18
10/16/2013CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:20:10R55CKSUM LOG23000VO
18Page -Council Check Summary
10/11/2013 -9/28/2013
Vendor AmountBusiness Unit Object
274.08
371.39CONCESSIONSCONCESSION SUPPLIESWATSON CO INC
371.39
879.23WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICEWEBER ELECTRIC
879.23
1,408.00COUNTS AND STUDIES OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESWSB ASSOC INC
1,408.00
138.18STORM WATER UTILITY G&A ELECTRIC SERVICEXCEL ENERGY
22,538.08ENTERPRISE G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE
22,676.26
350.00NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICESZANDER, LOIS
350.00
90.04GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORYZIEGLER INC
12,677.73PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
2,937.72GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
15,705.49
Report Totals 1,404,269.79
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 4q)
Title: Vendor Claims Page 19
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: October 21, 2013
Public Hearing Agenda Item: 6a
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Assessment of Delinquent Charges
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Mayor to open the public hearing, solicit comments, and close
the public hearing. Motion to Adopt Resolution to assess delinquent water, sewer, storm water,
refuse, abating grass/weed cutting, tree removal/injection, false alarm fees and other
miscellaneous charges.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish to collect outstanding fees and
charges through the special assessment process?
SUMMARY: The City certifies delinquent charges to Hennepin County as a means to collect
on these accounts. The certification is done via the special assessment process, and becomes a
lien on the individual properties that is due over the next year or several years, depending upon
the type of charge. Information on the 2013 certification process is provided below.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Collection of these charges is vital to the
financial stability of our utility systems and to reimburse the city for expenses incurred in
providing services.
VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion
Sample Certification Letter
Resolution Levying Assessment
Prepared by: Steven Heintz, Finance Supervisor
Reviewed by: Brian Swanson, Controller
Approved by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 6a) Page 2
Title: Assessment of Delinquent Charges
DISCUSSION
BACKGROUND: Each of the customers involved in this special assessment process received a
City service. Subsequently, the customers were then billed through our regular billing process.
The invoice(s) is/are now past due, and the recommended method of collecting the past due
amounts is through certification as a special assessment to the property for the next year or years
taxes depending on the delinquency. In advance of the public hearing date, individual letters
were mailed to property owners and tenants, if applicable, advising them of the assessment and
their right to be heard before the City Council. The table below shows comparison data from
2009 - 2013 in relation to number of letters mailed and value of delinquent amounts.
Year Number of Letters Delinquent Amounts Final Certification
Amounts
2013 1811 $872,661 N/A
2012 1803 $816,357 $504,937
2011 1631 $834,605 $583,642
2010 1634 $743,023 $447,472
2009 1687 $753,624 $453,059
Each year there are a number of residents who pay their delinquent amount(s) before the
certification deadline, thereby reducing the final amount certified and sent to Hennepin County.
In addition, during the month of October, there are several hundred property owners who contact
the City with questions about their outstanding balance(s) and the certification process. The
delinquent balance was $675,753 as of the close of business on October 14, 2013. Staff will
provide the delinquent amount balance as of the close of business on October 21, 2013 at the
Council meeting. Customers have until November 1, 2013 at 4:30 p.m. to pay the delinquent
amount. The amounts shown do not include interest or the $30.00 per account administrative
fee. A copy of the assessment roll is on file with the City Clerk’s office for review.
NEXT STEPS: After conducting a public hearing, the City Council is asked to direct the
assessment of delinquent water, sewer, storm water, refuse, abating grass/weed cutting, tree
removal/injection, false alarm fees and other miscellaneous charges against the benefiting
property.
Staff will continue to collect payments related to the delinquent accounts and work with residents
to resolve issues related to their delinquent accounts. All delinquent accounts outstanding as of
November 1, 2013 at 4:30 p.m. will be certified to Hennepin County for collection as part of the
owner’s property tax bill. Upon certification, the delinquent amounts will become a lien on the
individual properties.
At this time, the Accounting Division has not received notice of anyone wanting to speak at the
Public Hearing.
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 6a) Page 3
Title: Assessment of Delinquent Charges
5005 Minnetonka Blvd
St. Louis Park, MN 55416-2216
Date of Notice: October 1, 2013
Mailing Address Line 1
Mailing Address Line 2
Mailing Address Line 3
Mailing Address Line 4
Mailing Address Line 5
Mailing Address Line 6
RE: Charges Owed: For Delinquent Utility Account:
Service Address: Service Address
Delinquent Amount: Current WO Balance
Account Number: Account Number
Customer Number: Customer Number
Property I.D. Number: Tax Roll Numeric
Dear: Customer Name
The City of St. Louis Park encourages its customers to remain current in the payment of their
bills. When accounts become delinquent, according to Minnesota law, they may be certified to
Hennepin County to be collected with property taxes payable in the next year.
City of St. Louis Park records show this account was delinquent as of September 18, 2013. In
an effort to avoid the account from being certified to the property taxes, the City is requesting
that payment in full be received at City Hall by Friday, November 1, 2013 at 4:30p.m. If
payment in full is not received by that date and time, the outstanding delinquent amount, plus an
administrative charge of $30.00, and interest at a rate of 5.85% for 13 months will be sent to
Hennepin County for collection with the property taxes in 2014.
The City Council will consider final action on all delinquent accounts at a public hearing during
the regular Council meeting on Monday, October 21, 2013 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council
Chambers. A written appeal may be presented to the Council at that time or appeals may be
made to Brian Swanson - Controller, 5005 Minnetonka Blvd., St. Louis Park, MN 55416. The
City would like to avoid the certification process, as it adds additional costs to all parties
involved in the long run.
Please feel free to contact our office at (952) 924-2111 if you have questions regarding this
notice. Payments may be made via cash, check, or credit card in person at City Hall, by mailing
a check to City Hall, or paying by credit card at https://eub.stlouispark.org. Payments cannot
be accepted over the phone. eBill customers should check their “junk” email folder for any
email notifications they did not receive.
Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter.
Brian Swanson
Controller
City of St. Louis Park, 5005 Minnetonka Boulevard, St. Louis Park, MN 55416
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 6a) Page 4
Title: Assessment of Delinquent Charges
RESOLUTION NO. 13-____
LEVYING ASSESSMENT FOR DELINQUENT UTILITY ACCOUNTS, TREE
REMOVAL/INJECTION, FALSE ALARM FEES AND OTHER MISCELLANEOUS
CHARGES
WHEREAS, the City Council has heretofore determined by ordinance the rates and
charges for water, sewer, storm water and refuse services of the city and has provided for the
abatement of tree removal/injection, grass/weed cutting and other miscellaneous charges to a
home or business shall be at the expense of the owners of the premises involved; and
WHEREAS, all such sums become delinquent and assessable against the property served
under Section 6-158, Section 6-206, Section 9-103, Section 9-110, Section 11-2004 of the St.
Louis Park Ordinance Code and Minnesota Statutes 18.023, 18.271, 443 and 429; and
WHEREAS, Accounting has prepared an assessment roll setting forth an assessment
against each tract or parcel of land served by water, sewer, storm water and refuse services of the
City or charged for the costs of abating grass/weed cutting, tree removal/injection, false alarm fees
and other miscellaneous charges which remain unpaid at the close of business on November 1,
2013; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis
Park that said assessment roll is hereby adopted and approved, and there is hereby levied and
assessed against each and every tract of land described therein an assessment in the amounts
respectively therein abating water, sewer, storm water, refuse, grass/weed cutting, tree
removal/injection, false alarm fees and other miscellaneous charges which remain unpaid at the
close of business on November 1, 2013; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Controller is hereby authorized to deliver said
assessment roll to the Auditor of Hennepin County for collection of the assessment in the same
manner as other municipal taxes are collected and payment thereof enforced with interest from the
date of this resolution at the rate of five point eight five percent (5.85 %) per annum.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council October 21, 2013
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: October 21, 2013
Action Agenda Item: 8a
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Adoption of 2014 Utility Rates
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution setting the 2014 Utility Rates.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council desire to set the 2014 Utility Rates as
proposed?
SUMMARY: At the October 14, 2013 study session, staff presented the proposed utility rates to
Council. City staff, in conjunction with consultants, analyzed the City’s utility operations and
capital plans over the next 10 years to determine if rate adjustments are needed to maintain long
term sustainability in each of the four utility funds. The City Council reviewed and discussed
information provided by staff over the course of the year to determine the proposed utility rates
for 2014 to be considered this evening. Based on analyses from information in the CIP and the
plan approved by Council, which is the continued phased-in increase to the fixed fee for the
Water Fund as a means to reduce some of the seasonal volatility, changes in utility rates are
being recommended. The changes are consistent with information Council received in the past
and are in line with the goals of achieving long-term sustainability in the funds and promoting a
decrease in refuse.
For 2014, the approximate cumulative effect on a typical residential property for all the utility
rate adjustments would be an increase of $39.80, or 4.32% for the year, or approximately $3.32
per month. This calculation is based on a family of four using 30 units of water per quarter
(22,500 gallons), and 60 gallon solid waste service.
The recommended rates will be in place for consumption or services provided beginning on
January 1, 2014. The attached resolution provides specific information on the recommended rate
adjustments for each fund.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The utility rates will support necessary city
services to be provided during 2014.
VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: 2014 Proposed Utility Rates - Impact on a Residential Property
Resolution
Prepared by: Steven Heintz, Finance Supervisor
Reviewed by: Brian Swanson, Controller
Approved by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director
CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK
ESTIMATED QUARTERLY UTILITY BILL
ACTUAL 2013 AND PROPOSED 2014
Household Size 4
Units per quarter 30
Solid Waste Service 60-gallon
Meter size 3/4 inch
Actual Proposed Dollar Percent
Service Type 2013 2014 Change Change Notes
Water
Per unit rate - Tier 1 1.44$ 1.49$ 0.05$ 3.47%
Service charge 15.03$ 17.47$ 2.44$ 16.23%
State testing fee 1.59$ 1.59$ -$ 0.00%
Consumption 43.20$ 44.70$ 1.50$ 3.47%
Sewer
Service charge 13.43$ 13.83$ 0.40$ 2.98%
Per unit 2.61$ 2.69$ 0.08$ 3.07%
Consumption 78.30$ 80.70$ 2.40$ 3.07%
Storm Drainage
Service charge 16.00$ 17.60$ 1.60$ 10.00%
Bassett Creek Fee*1.93$ 1.93$ -$ 0.00%Bassett Creek fee
Solid Waste (includes tax)62.97$ 64.58$ 1.61$ 2.56%
Total Bill without Bassett*230.52$ 240.47$ 9.95$ 4.32%Not including BCWMC
Increase per quarter (dollars)9.95$
Increase per year (dollars)39.80$
* Since not all property owners would be charged this fee, it is not included in the dollar or percentage change in total bill.
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Adoption of 2014 Utility Rates Page 2
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 8a) Page 3
Title: Adoption of 2014 Utility Rates
RESOLUTION NO. 13-____
RESOLUTION SETTING UTILITY RATES
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota has received a
report through the Controller related to proposed utility rates; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary for the city to maintain charges in an amount necessary to
cover the cost of providing service to users; and
WHEREAS, maintaining rates through regular adjustment is a recommended practice
rather than large intermittent increases;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis
Park, MN, that:
1. The water rates as recommended are hereby adopted.
Description Units of Usage* Adopted
Rate
Tier1 0 - 40 units (0-30,000 gallons) $1.49
Tier 2 41-80 units (30,001 – 60,000
gallons)
$1.86
Tier 3 >80 units (>60,000 gallons) $2.78
Commercial All units $1.49
Irrigation All units $2.78
*1 unit equals 100 cubic feet or 750 gallons
2. The water meter charges recommended are hereby adopted.
Residential/Multi-
family
Quarterly Fee
Commercial
Monthly Fee
Meter Size 2014 2014
5/8" $17.47 $5.82
3/4" $17.47 $5.82
1" $24.46 $8.15
1.5" $31.45 $10.48
2" $50.66 $16.89
3" $192.17 $64.06
4" $244.58 $81.53
6" $366.87 $122.29
2" compound $50.66 n/a
3" compound $192.17 n/a
3. The Minnesota Department of Health state testing for water quality will continue to be
imposed at a rate of $1.59 per quarter for residential and multi-family and $0.53 per month
for commercial accounts.
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 8a) Page 4
Title: Adoption of 2014 Utility Rates
4. The sanitary sewer usage rate recommended is hereby adopted at $2.69 per unit.
5. The sanitary sewer base charge recommended is hereby adopted at $13.83 per quarter for
residential and multi-family accounts and $4.61 per month for commercial accounts.
6. The storm sewer rate recommended is hereby adopted at $17.60 per quarter per residential
equivalent unit or $29.35 per month per residential equivalent unit for commercial accounts.
7. The Bassett Creek Watershed Management Charge pass through for properties located within
the Bassett Creek Watershed Management District will be $1.93 per quarter per residential
equivalent unit or $0.64 per month per residential equivalent unit.
8. The solid waste service charges per quarter recommended are hereby adopted.
Service Level In Gallons Rates – without tax
20 $31.93
30 $49.75
60 $64.58
90 $87.14
120 $111.24
150 $134.42
180 $157.59
210 Eliminated
240 Eliminated
270 $222.48
360 $315.18
450 $417.15
540 $500.58
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council October 21, 2013
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: October 21, 2013
Action Agenda Item: 8b
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Resolution Confirming Appointment of Stephen Koering to the Position of Fire Chief
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution confirming the appointment of
Stephen Koering to the position of Fire Chief.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: None at this time.
SUMMARY: With the resignation of Luke Stemmer, a vacancy has been created in the position
of Fire Chief. Following an extensive recruitment and selection process with our Fire Civil
Service Commission, staff, and consultant Richard Fursman, the City Manager has selected
Steve Koering to fill this position. We are pleased that he is scheduled to start with us on
November 18, 2013, pending confirmation.
The City’s Fire Chief provides leadership and direction for all fire service functions for the City.
This position is key to the success of our public safety program in fire prevention, suppression,
and emergency preparedness. The Fire Chief will work closely with all departments to ensure
long range planning and policy development relating to fire prevention and suppression. The
City Manager works closely with the Fire Chief as part of the management team. To support
ongoing learning and leadership connections, we have approved eligibility for tuition
reimbursement as a probationary employee and funding attendance to the Fire Chief’s
conference in November.
Most recently, Mr. Koering has been the Assistant Fire Chief, Operations, for the City of Eden
Prairie, and has served that city for 24 years. Educationally, Mr. Koering holds AAS degrees in
Fire Protection and Emergency Management and is currently pursuing ongoing professional
development with Bachelor of Science degree in Fire Science Administration, while also serving
as an Adjunct Instructor of fire science and emergency management curriculum at Hennepin
Technical College. In addition, Mr. Koering serves as Incident Commander, Operations Section
Chief, and Liaison Officer on the multi-disciplinary volunteer response team deployed
throughout the state to provide support following tornadoes, floods, and other natural disasters.
The City of St. Louis Park will be fortunate to have him bring his many talents and abilities to
our community.
City Charter Section 5.04: Powers and Duties of the City Manager, states that with the consent of
the Council, the City Manager may appoint all department heads and other officers of the City.
At this time, the City Manager is seeking confirmation from the Council of the appointment of
Stephen Koering as Fire Chief.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution
Resume
Prepared by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 8b) Page 2
Title: Resolution Confirming Appointment of Stephen Koering to the Position of Fire Chief.
RESOLUTION NO. 13-___
RESOLUTION OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
CONFIRMING THE APPOINTMENT OF STEPHEN KOERING
TO THE POSITION OF FIRE CHIEF
WHEREAS, St. Louis Park City Charter Section 5.04 grants authority to the City Manager
to control and direct the administration of the City’s affairs and to appoint, with the consent of
the Council, all Department Heads; and
WHEREAS, the resignation of Luke Stemmer has resulted in a vacancy in the position of
Fire Chief; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager has conducted an extensive recruitment and selection process
and as a result of that process, now wishes to appoint Stephen Koering to the position of Fire
Chief and will begin employment November 18, 2013; and
WHEREAS, in support of continued professional development and leadership connections,
the City Manager has approved tuition reimbursement as a probationary employee and funding
his attendance at the Fire Chief’s conference.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of St. Louis
Park, Minnesota confirms the decision of the City Manager to appoint Mr. Koering to the
position of Fire Chief.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council October 21, 2013
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
STEVE KOERING
.
FIRE SERVICE LEADER
- Confident, collaborative and decisive emergency leader with more than 25 years as a Firefighter and Fire Chief, Type
III Incident Management Team Leader and Adjunct Instructor of Emergency Management and Fire Science.
- Analytical thinker, poised for next-level success in a leadership role in support of large-scale, vital public safety
concerns.
- Strategic leader of cross-functional teams, known for establishing open communications between departments. Able
to the bridge the gap between managem ent, planning and field operations.
- Dynamic, hands-on leadership including experience with multiple staffing models as well as experience managing
vendors, contractors and subcontractors.
- Adept at navigating public safety and emergency conduits to provide optimal delivery of manpower and resources to
communities during local and national crises.
- Able to adapt rapidly and lead through organizational change, with a proven track record of implementing best
practices and training responders , driving process improvements through the development of a Joint Powers
Association, increasing employee engagement and successfully harmonizing part-time, paid on call and full time staff.
FIRE PREVENTION, PROTECTION + SUPPRESSION — LAWS + REGULATORY COMPLIANCE — DATA + TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION
HIGH PERFORMANCE TEAM LEADERSHIP — CONTINUOUS PROCESS IMPROVEMENT — VENDOR + CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS
CHANGE M ANAGEMENT — EFFECTIVE PARTNERING — PRESENTATION + PUBLIC SPEAKING — EMERGENCY ADMINISTRATION
E MERGENCY E XPERIENCE
The City of Eden Prairie, MN Eden Prairie, MN || 1989 – Present
ASSISTANT FIRE CHIEF, OPERATIONS (FULL TIME) || 2005 – Present
FIREFIGHTER, LIEUTENANT AND ASSISTANT CHIEF OPERATIONS (PAID ON CALL) || 1989 – 2005
Promoted to oversee the largest area of operations within the department. Lead, mentor and engage Fire Department
personnel at four fire stations each with a Captain and an authorized strength of up to 95 staff. Provide leadership and
accountability for Technical Operations division with one full and one part time resource responsible for the
maintenance, repair and preparation of all radio, card access and citywide security equipment. Assist with the
preparation and administration of a departmental budget of roughly $4.6M. Foster relationships internally between
departments and externally with local and federal agencies and the community.
Key Accomplishments
Providing leadership and cultivating teams through change from a primarily volunteer and on-call scenario to an
organization with shift-based coverage and full-time staff. Successfully identify and resolve conflicts between full-
time and paid on-call staff to ensure team cohesion and optimal coverage.
Improved employee satisfaction through the implementation of an innovative and highly successful engagement
model, which involved gathering and analyzing survey data and implementing improvements such as management
training and clarification of goals and expectations. Collaborated and delegated leadership to Captains, thereby
making the transition process more inclusive. This process, now in its second year, achieved 100% participation and
resulted in city leadership awards for all four of the Captains involved.
Achieved an average overall reduction in response time by 4.5 minutes.
Oversaw the successful construction of a new fire station. Managed vendors and union contractors and completed
the project within budget. The new facility filled a gap in emergency response for the rapidly growing southwest side
of the city and expanded capabilities by being able to serve as a primary emergency operations center.
Analyzed, streamlined and standardized purchasing looking at more than just lowest cost providers, thereby
developing strategic, long-term vendor relationships. Also implemented inventory tracking and purchase order
systems, all of which has already produced a 22% year-over-year cost savings.
Minnesota Type III Incident Management Team Minneapolis, MN || 2006 – Present
INCIDENT COMMANDER, OPERATIONS SECTION CHIEF AND LIAISON OFFICER
Serve as a member of the multi-disciplinary 100-person volunteer response team deployed throughout the state of
Minnesota and surrounding areas to provide operational, tactical and advisory support following tornadoes, floods and
other natural disasters. Provide planning, logistics, finance and command assistance to local agencies. Develop and
apply best practices and learning to improve efficiency. Achieve and maintain all training requirements.
Deployed three times following floods. Successfully creating measures for continuity of operations and
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 8b)
Title: Resolution Confirming Appointment of Stephen Koering to the Position of Fire Chief Page 3
STEVE KOERING—————————————————————————————P A G E 2
implementing debris management plans.
Hennepin Technical College Eden Prairie, MN || 2001 – Present
ADJUNCT INSTRUCTOR, FIRE SCIENCE CURRICULUM AND EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT CURRICULUM
Teach in both the Fall and Spring term in the Fire Science and Emergency Management Curriculum. Develop all
course materials and lesson plans for 6 to 30 students per class. Create and grade assignments and exams. Meet all
requirements to provide Emergency Management certification.
Successfully built internal advocacy for and designed an expanded Emergency Management Curriculum and Degree
with course offerings beyond the standard certification courses.
Regularly achieve high marks in student surveys, particularly around knowledge and ability to apply real life examples.
P RIVATE S ECTOR E XPERIENCE
NATIONAL ACCOUNT EXECUTIVE – Zomax, Inc. Plymouth, MN || 1995 – 2005
SENIOR ACCOUNT EXECUTIVE – Braun Media Services Plymouth, MN || 1994 – 1995
VICE PRESIDENT OF SALES – Cycle Software Services Eden Prairie, MN || 1993 – 1994
NATIONAL ACCOUNTS MANAGER – Sanborn Manufacturing Eden Prairie, MN || 1986 – 1993
A SSOCIATIONS AND P ROFESSIONAL E NGAGEMENT
Former Board President and Current SCBA Technical Committee Chair
Southwest Joint Powers Association | 2005-Present
Co-founded a collaborative organization that continues to grow membership from 2 to 24 fire departments to standardize
the purchasing and quality of equipment. Developed the first vendor agreement for SCBA equipment. Implemented
processes which meet 10 of the 16 life safety initiatives. Currently collaborating with the League of Minnesota to
demonstrate measurable risk reduction.
Project Manager Heart Safe Eden Prairie | 2005-present
Leads the successful effort to identify and maintain automatic external defibrillators in 78 public locations including 30
government buildings to increase public safety. Works to locate new units and promote the use of this technology
throughout the City.
Member, Metro Fire Chiefs Association | 2001 – Present
Former Board Member and President, Hennepin County Fire Chiefs Association | 2001 – Present
Minnesota Fire Department Association | 1989 – Present
International Association of Fire Chiefs | 2003-Present
Southwest Mutual Aid Association | 2001 – Present
Minnesota State Fire Chiefs Association- 2003-present- Current Membership Chair
E DUCATION
AAS IN FIRE PROTECTION – Hennepin Technical College, Eden Prairie, MN
AAS IN EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT – Hennepin Technical College, Eden Prairie, MN
STATE CERTIFIED EMERGENCY MANAGER – Homeland Security Emergency Management
CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION – Hamline University, St. Paul, MN
BACHELOR OF FIRE SCIENCE ADMINISTRATION – Waldorf College, St. Paul, MN (projected graduation Spring 2015)
City Council Meeting of October 21, 2013 (Item No. 8b)
Title: Resolution Confirming Appointment of Stephen Koering to the Position of Fire Chief Page 4