HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014/02/10 - ADMIN - Agenda Packets - City Council - Study SessionAGENDA
FEBRUARY 10, 2014
6:00 p.m. BOARDS & COMMISSIONS INTERVIEWS – Westwood Room
6:30 p.m. CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION – Council Chambers
Discussion Items
1. 6:30 p.m. Future Study Session Agenda Planning – February 18 and 24, 2014
2. 6:35 p.m. Introduction to Form-Based Codes
3. 7:35 p.m. Southwest LRT Update
4. 8:35 p.m. Review Outcomes and Agenda for City Council Workshop
8:50 p.m. Communications/Meeting Check-In (Verbal)
8:55 p.m. Adjourn
Written Reports
5. Proposed Allocation of 2014 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds
6. Highway 169 – Noise Wall Project
7. Highway 169 – W. 16th Street Access Closure
8. EDA Redevelopment Contract Status Report
9. Annual Open to Business Program Update
10. Board of Zoning Appeals (BOZA) 2013 Annual Report
Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request.
To make arrangements, please call the Administration Department at
952/924-2525 (TDD 952/924-2518) at least 96 hours in advance of meeting.
Meeting: Study Session
Meeting Date: February 10, 2014
Discussion Item: 1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Future Study Session Agenda Planning – February 18 and 24, 2014
RECOMMENDED ACTION: The City Council and the City Manager to set the agenda for
the Special Study Session scheduled for February 18, 2014 and the regularly scheduled Study
Session on February 24, 2014.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the Council agree with the agendas as proposed?
SUMMARY: At each study session approximately five minutes are set aside to discuss the next
study session agenda. For this purpose, attached please find the proposed discussion items for
the Special Study Session scheduled for February 18, 2014 and the regularly scheduled Study
Session on February 24, 2014.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Future Study Session Agenda Planning – February 18 & 24, 2014
Prepared by: Debbie Fischer, Office Assistant
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
Study Session Meeting of February 10, 2014 (Item No. 1) Page 2
Title: Future Study Session Agenda Planning – February 18 and 24, 2014
Special Study Session, February 18 (Tuesday), 2014 – 6:30 p.m.
Tentative Discussion Items
1. Update on Fire Department Operations – Fire (50 minutes)
An update from the new Fire Chief following his first 90 days since coming on board. A
brief review of actions within the department, new initiatives planned for 2014 and thoughts
about where we go from here will be given. Included in this discussion will be an update on
the progress between the City of St. Louis Park and Park Nicollet towards the possibility of
undertaking a Pilot Program to confront the high costs of reentry by patients into the hospital
system within thirty days of discharge. Staff will provide a more detailed update on this
initiative.
End of Meeting: 7:20 pm
Boards & Commissions Interviews , February 24, 2014 – 6:00 p.m.
Study Session, February 24, 2014 – 6:30 p.m.
Tentative Discussion Items
1. Future Study Session Agenda Planning – Administrative Services (5 minutes)
2. SWLRT Station Plans – Community Development (60 minutes)
An update will be provided on the freight issue. Staff will discuss work on planning for the
three LRT station areas including evaluation of platform location and grade separation
options and introduce the Transitional Station Area Action Plans (TSAAP also known as the
Investment Framework).
3. 2014-2015 Communications Plan/Ideas in the Park – Information Resources (60 minutes)
Information Resources staff will briefly review the 2012-2013 Communications Plan and
present the proposed 2014-2015 Communications Plan. The plan is not formally adopted by
the Council, but this meeting serves as an opportunity for council members to help staff set
communications priorities for the next two years. Additionally, staff will review use of
IdeasInThePark.org and other communications tools.
Communications/Meeting Check-In – Administrative Services (5 minutes)
Time for communications between staff and Council will be set aside on every study session
agenda for the purposes of information sharing.
Reports
4. 2013 Housing Activity Report
5. 2014 January Financial Report
End of Meeting: 8:40 pm
Meeting: Study Session
Meeting Date: February 10, 2014
Written Report: 10
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Board of Zoning Appeals (BOZA) 2013 Annual Report
RECOMMENDED ACTION: No action at this time. The BOZA 2013 Annual Report
summarizes the work completed by the BOZA in 2013.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: None at this time.
SUMMARY: In accordance with Council policy, the 2013 Annual Report is attached in full for
City Council review. The report:
• States the powers and duties of the BOZA.
• Identifies when a variance is considered by the BOZA or the Planning Commission.
• Highlights the number and type of applications processed in 2013.
• Summarizes each variance request, and the action taken by the BOZA.
The BOZA and planning staff can respond to any questions the City Council may have at a
future City Council meeting.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis park is committed to providing a well-maintained and
diverse housing stock.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: 2013 BOZA Annual Report
Prepared by: Gary Morrison, Assistant Zoning Administrator
Reviewed by: Meg McMonigal, Planning & Zoning Supervisor
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
Board of Zoning Appeals
2013 Annual Report
Board of Zoning Appeals Commission Members
Susan Bloyer, Chair
James Gainsley, Vice-Chair
Paul Roberts, Board Member
Justin Kaufman, Board Member
Henry Solmer, Board Member
Gary Morrison, Staff Liaison
Study Session Meeting of February 10, 2014 (Item No. 10)
Title: Board of Zoning Appeals (BOZA) 2013 Annual Report Page 2
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
Board of Zoning Appeals (BOZA) established:
Section 2-301 – 305 of the City Code establishes the Board of Zoning Appeals.
Membership:
The Board consists of five regular members appointed by the City Council for three-year terms. The
members of the board are to be qualified voters and residents of the city.
A staff liaison to the Board is appointed by the City Manager. The staff liaison is the Assistant Zoning
Administrator, Gary Morrison.
Meetings:
The Board meets once a month, at 6 pm on the fourth Thursday of the month.
Powers and duties:
The responsibilities of the BOZA include:
(1) Hear and decide on appeals from any order, requirement, permit decision or refusal or
determination made by the zoning administrator under the zoning chapter and from any
interpretation of the text of the zoning chapter, or any location of the boundary of a zoning
district as shown on the official zoning map made by the zoning administrator, in
accordance with all requirements of local and state laws.
(2) Hear and decide on requests for variances from the terms of the zoning chapter in the
manner and subject to the standards and requirements set forth in the zoning chapter and
applicable state laws.
(3) Communicate with the City Council its recommendations, records of proceedings and any
other method of reporting as may be deemed appropriate by the city council.
(4) Act in an advisory capacity to the City Council and hear and make recommendations to the
City Council on all matters referred to the board or upon which it is required to act under
the zoning chapter.
Decision subject to appeal to the City Council:
Any party aggrieved by a decision of the BOZA may appeal the decision to the City Council. The
appeal must be filed with the planning department within ten days of issuance of the BOZA decision.
Variances heard by the BOZA or the Planning Commission:
A variance application will be heard by either the BOZA or the Planning Commission depending on
the nature of the application. Occasionally a variance application is submitted to the City as part of a
larger development that also requires a Conditional Use Permit (CUP), Planned Unit development
(PUD) or subdivision. When this happens, then the variance application is sent to the Planning
Commission for consideration along with the CUP, PUD or subdivision applications. This allows the
Planning Commission to review and consider all applications together, as one proposal.
If the variance application is not part of a larger development, meaning, it is the only application
submitted, then the variance is considered by the BOZA. This is typically the case for single family
home owners that need a variance for an addition or garage. Occasionally, the BOZA will consider an
application from a commercial property that needs a variance to complete a small improvement, but
only if another application such as a CUP, PUD or subdivision is not also required.
Study Session Meeting of February 10, 2014 (Item No. 10)
Title: Board of Zoning Appeals (BOZA) 2013 Annual Report Page 3
2013 - SUMMARY
Ryan Burt resigned from the committee, and the City Council appointed Justin Kaufman to fill the
vacancy. Mr. Kaufman’s first meeting was June 27th.
The BOZA heard seven variance applications, and approved all of them. Two of the variance
requests, however, were reduced by the BOZA because they were unable to find that the requested
variances met the criteria for granting a variance. They were, however, able to approve findings for
reduced variances.
One decision was appealed to the City Council (4701 Excelsior Blvd – BP Station). The BOZA
decision was upheld by the Council.
The following is a summary of the variances applied for since 2007.
VARIANCE APPLICATIONS RECEIVED 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
RESIDENTIAL
Setbacks Attached Garages:
Interior side setback: 0 1 2 1 2 0 1
Rear setback: 0 3 0 1 0 0
Side yard abutting the street setback: 0 3 0 0 0 0
Living Space:
Front setback: 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
Interior side setback: 1 1 0 0 0 1
Side yard abutting the street setback: 0 1 0 0 0 0
Miscellaneous:
Deck-Interior side yard: 1 0 0 0 0 0
Open covered porch – front yard 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Eave – interior side yard 3 0 0 0 0 0
Total Residential Variances: 5 9 2 2 2 2 3
COMMERCIAL
Rear setback: 0 0 0 0 0 0
Front setback: 1 0 0 0 1 0 1
Side yard abutting the street setback: 0 1 0 0 0 0 2
Expand a non-conformity: 0 1 0 0 0 0
Increase total sign area: 0 0 0 1 0 0
Drive aisle width: 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Total Commercial Variances: 1 2 0 1 1 0 4
Total Variances: 6 11 2 3 3 2 7
APPEAL APPLICATIONS RECEIVED 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
RESIDENTIAL 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
COMMERCIAL 1 0 0 1 0 0 1
Study Session Meeting of February 10, 2014 (Item No. 10)
Title: Board of Zoning Appeals (BOZA) 2013 Annual Report Page 4
Jennings Liquor – 4637 Excelsior Blvd.
BOZA Date: April 25, 2013
Continued Date: May 23, 2013
Request: To construct an addition with the
following variances:
• 7.5 foot variance to allow a 5.0 foot
front yard.
• 10.0 foot variance to allow a 5.0 foot
side yard abutting the street.
• Variance to allow the corner of the
building to encroach into the visibility
triangle.
BOZA Action: The applicant requested a
variance to allow a 0.0 foot front setback
and a 0.0 foot side yard abutting the street
setback. The BOZA expressed a
reluctance to approve a variance that would allow the building to go up to the property line along the
front and side yard abutting the street.
The applicant asked that the request be tabled so that the applicant can consider a lesser variance. The
BOZA indicated that it would be willing to consider a variance to allow a 5.0 foot front and side yard
abutting the street.
The applicant resubmitted plans and a revised applicant requesting the above variances to allow the
building to be 5.0 feet from the front and side yard abutting the street property line. The BOZA
approved the request along with a variance to allow the corner of the building to extend into the
visibility triangle to the extent shown in the survey.
No permits have been issued at this time of this report. Work has not begun.
Before Photograph:
Study Session Meeting of February 10, 2014 (Item No. 10)
Title: Board of Zoning Appeals (BOZA) 2013 Annual Report Page 5
Matthew Wyatt – 3333 Huntington Ave S
BOZA Date: June 27, 2013
Request: To construct an attached
garage with the following variance:
• 1.9 foot variance to the required 5.0
foot side yard
BOZA Action: Approved the
requested 1.9 foot variance to allow an
attached two-car garage to be
constructed 3.1 feet from the interior
side property line.
The applicant wanted additional
storage space behind the garage to also
be setback 3.1 feet from the property
line. The BOZA, however, did not extend the variance to include the storage area. Therefore, only
the garage portion of the addition can be setback 3.1 feet from the property line. The storage space
has to adhere to the 5.0 foot side yard setback.
Under Construction:
Before:
Study Session Meeting of February 10, 2014 (Item No. 10)
Title: Board of Zoning Appeals (BOZA) 2013 Annual Report Page 6
Elion Acquisitions – 4701 Excelsior Blvd
BOZA Date: August 22, 2013
Request: To remove existing fuel station, and construct new three tenant commercial building. The
following variances were requested for the building and the parking lot:
• 10 foot variance to allow a 5.0 foot side yard abutting the street.
• 1 foot variance to allow a 24 foot wide drive aisle instead of the required 25 feet.
BOZA Action:
The BOZA approved the requested variances. The approval was appealed to the City Council.
Appeal to City Council:
The Council conducted the appeal, and voted to uphold the BOZA decision.
Update:
The applicant did not purchase the property, and the proposal is not moving forward.
The fuel station was purchased by “Excelsior BP”, a group that owns other fuel stations around the
metro area. The new owner intends to operate the fuel/repair station as is. He is not proposing any
changes to the site.
Study Session Meeting of February 10, 2014 (Item No. 10)
Title: Board of Zoning Appeals (BOZA) 2013 Annual Report Page 7
Bill Worms – 2930 Cavell Ave S.
BOZA Date: September 26, 2013
Request:
To construct an addition with the
following variances:
• 10.1 foot variance to allow a 19.9
foot front yard.
• 6.3 foot variance to allow a 13.7
foot front yard for an open covered
porch.
The applicant requested the
variances to construct an addition to
the front of the house. The addition
fills in an open area between two existing bump-outs, so the front wall will extend, without
interruption, across the entire front of the house. The second floor addition did not require a variance.
BOZA Action:
Approved the request.
Before :
Under Construction:
Study Session Meeting of February 10, 2014 (Item No. 10)
Title: Board of Zoning Appeals (BOZA) 2013 Annual Report
Page 8
Meeting: Study Session
Meeting Date: February 10, 2014
Discussion Item: 2
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Introduction to Form-Based Codes
RECOMMENDED ACTION: No action at this time. The purpose of this item is to provide an
overview to Council of form-based codes and how they work.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: No policy consideration at this time.
SUMMARY: The City received a Livable Communities Demonstration Account-Transit Oriented
Development (LCDA-TOD) Pre-Development grant from the Metropolitan Council in July, 2013 to
develop a form-based code (FBC). The form-based code will address the three SWLRT station areas
and is being pursued to foster and encourage Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) in these areas.
Staff last discussed this item at the November 25 study session. Council had numerous questions on
how this form of zoning would work and asked that they be kept apprised as the study moved
forward.
The City has contracted with CodaMetrics, based in Chicago, IL to develop the form-based code and
to guide the City through this process. The project is expected to be complete in May, 2015. As part
of the consultant’s initial visit, staff has asked the consultant to provide an introduction to form-based
codes to the Council. The presentation will provide a brief overview of what form-based codes are,
how they promote walkable, mixed-use areas and how form-based codes compare to traditional
zoning.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: $25,000 City Match.
($125,000 total budget with $100,000 from the Metropolitan Council + $25,000 City Match.)
VISION CONSIDERATION:
1. St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged community.
2. St. Louis Park is committed to promoting an integrating arts, culture and community aesthetics in
all City initiatives, including implementation where appropriate.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Excerpt of Presentation Slides
Prepared by: Ryan Kelley, Associate Planner
Reviewed by: Meg McMonigal, Planning & Zoning Supervisor
Michele Schnitker, Housing Supervisor
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
!
!what?
1 FORM-BASED CODES foster PREDICTABLE built results.
2 FORM-BASED CODES foster a high-quality PUBLIC REALM.
3 FORM-BASED CODES use physical FORM as the organizing principle for the code.
4 FORM-BASED CODES are REGULATIONS, not just guidelines, adopted into city ordinance.
Study Session Meeting of February 10, 2014 (Item No. 2)
Title: Introduction to Form-Based Codes Page 2
!
!
regulate how far buildings are from sidewalks.
BUILDING FORM REGULATIONS FBCI Introducing
Form-Based Codes
Building(Form(Standards(designate%where%parking%should%go.%For%
example,%the%standards%can%require%the%placement%of%parking%to%the%
rear%of%buildings%to%ensure%that%it%doesn’t%get%between%buildings%and%
pedestrians.%%
/45 26
FBCI Introducing Form-Based Codes Building(Form(Standards(designate%where%parking%should%go.%For%example,%the%standards%can%require%the%placement%of%parking%to%the%
rear%of%buildings%to%ensure%that%it%doesn’t%get%between%buildings%and%
pedestrians.%%
/45 26
Images from Urban
Advantage
Study Session Meeting of February 10, 2014 (Item No. 2)
Title: Introduction to Form-Based Codes Page 3
!
!
regulate where doors and windows are
required, especially on ground stories.
BUILDING FORM REGULATIONS FBCI Introducing Form-Based Codes
Building(Form(Standards(can%require%buildings%to%have%
windows%and%welcoming%entries.%They%should%
contribute%to%life%on%the%sidewalk.%%
/45 25
FBCI Introducing Form-Based Codes
Building(Form(Standards(can%require%buildings%to%have%
windows%and%welcoming%entries.%They%should%
contribute%to%life%on%the%sidewalk.%%
/45 25
Images from Urban
Advantage
Study Session Meeting of February 10, 2014 (Item No. 2)
Title: Introduction to Form-Based Codes Page 4
!
!
Building
Parking
Building
Parking
Build-To Zone
Setback Line
Conventional Zoning Form-Based Coding
SETBACK LINE BUILD-TO LINE/ZONE
compare
Study Session Meeting of February 10, 2014 (Item No. 2)
Title: Introduction to Form-Based Codes Page 5
!
!
Conventional Zoning Form-Based Coding
FLOOR AREA RATIOS (FAR) DEFINED BUILDING ENVELOPE
compare
Study Session Meeting of February 10, 2014 (Item No. 2)
Title: Introduction to Form-Based Codes Page 6
Meeting: Study Session
Meeting Date: February 10, 2014
Discussion Item: 3
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Southwest LRT Update
RECOMMENDED ACTION: None at this time. Staff will provide an overview of the
TranSystems freight rail report and discuss with Council a response to its findings.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: The Council’s adopted policy on freight rail is that the City
will only consider a reroute if there is no viable alternative, and then only if proper mitigation is
provided.
SUMMARY: On January 30, 2014 the Metropolitan Council released three new reports related
to the SW LRT Project (located at http://www.stlouispark.org/light-freight-rail/recent-
news.html). For St. Louis Park the most relevant is the TranSystems report related to rerouting
freight rail through St. Louis Park. Comments on the reports are due on March 3, 2014 (this is a
change from what was previously identified).
The TranSystems draft report proposes a new reroute option through St. Louis Park using the
MNS tracks. It is essentially a variation on the re-route concept plan from the SWLRT DEIS. At
the study session staff will walk the City Council through the TranSystems concept plan and
highlight the concerns the plan presents for the city. It is proposed that these concerns be the core
of the comments the City will submit to the Met Council on the TranSystems draft report.
The key differences between the TranS ystems proposed plan and the SWLRT DEIS plan is how
and where the route crosses Hwy 7. The TranSystems plan adds a new bridge over Hwy 7,
requires the lowering of Hwy 7 three to four feet, passes the Excel substation on the west side
(the DEIS route passes on the east side) and requires substantial changes to roads in the
Walker/Lake Street, Library Lane area. Per TranSystems report this option will require the
acquisition of several homes and business including the STEP property.
The broad areas of concern identified to date are outlined in the Discussion section of this report.
Staff and its consultants are continuing to review the report and plans, and will provide more
detailed comments at the meeting. Southwest Project Office staff is reviewing and adjusting the
cost estimates in order that the new reroute can be compared with all of the other rail routing
options.
NEXT STEPS: Comments on the reports are due on March 3, 2014. Staff will refine comments
for Council consideration at the upcoming February meetings.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable at this time.
VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion: Outline of Concerns
Prepared by: Meg J. McMonigal, Planning and Zoning Supervisor
Reviewed by: Kevin Locke, Community Development Director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
Study Session Meeting of February 10, 2014 (Item No. 3) Page 2
Title: Southwest LRT Update
DISCUSSION
Preliminary Outline of Concerns
1. The TranSystems Reroute plan is not materially different from previous plans to reroute
trains in SLP. The TranSystems's plan:
1. Is based on extensive berms and bridge structures like the others
2. Has significant negative impacts on the community
3. Requires homes and businesses and non-profits to be acquired and relocated
4. Leaves unresolved the question of who is responsible for the long term
maintenance of the substantial new rail infrastructure it creates
5. Has uncertain acceptability by the railroads
6. Impacts the Excel substation; and,
7. Creates severe circulation problems in the vicinity of SLP HS
2. How the cost of this plan compares with the other freight rail plans is not known
1. The TranSystems cost estimates do not include property acquisition, permitting,
environmental remediation, wetland mitigation, and other mitigation needs the
City has identified in the past
2. No costs associated with "clipping" a corner of Excel Energy substation are
included
3. Precisely how the estimates were prepared and what was included in calculating
the costs has not been provided.
4. Substantial additional analysis is needed if cost comparisons between the
alternatives are to be made.
3. If a less expensive freight rail/LRT solution is the goal, cheaper alternatives already exist
and should be considered.
1. The least expensive freight rail solutions, co-location at grade and co-location
with the trail elevated or relocated, are clearly the least expensive solutions
2. In fairness to the taxpayers of the region, these co-location solutions should be
reconsidered if lower cost is the motivating goal.
4. Twin Cities & Western Railroad has stated, "we would accept any routing plan that
enabled us to operate at the same levels of safety and cost efficiency as we do now."
1. This is absolutely reasonable and appropriate. Why should any business or
property owner be expected give away what they already have for something less.
2. Can a train operate on the TranSystem design if it could overcome the obstacles to
being built? Yes. Is it a route that is at the same level of safety and cost efficiency
as Kenilworth? No.
3. By both measures, safety and cost efficiency, the TranSystem Plan is not at the
same level as Kenilworth.
4. The TranS ystem route is elevated on bridges and berms and passes by schools and
playgrounds and electrical substations and backyards.
5. The TranS ystems plan adds operational complexity for TCW by sharing the
MN&S trackage with CP.
5. The TranS ystems draft Report is full of errors, omissions and unexplained assumptions.
A detailed review will be completed and specific comments and corrections submitted.
Meeting: Study Session
Meeting Date: February 10, 2014
Discussion Item: 4
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Review Outcomes and Agenda for City Council Workshop
RECOMMENDED ACTION: No formal action required. Council is asked to review and
provide feedback on the draft design of the City Council workshop which will be held February
27 and 28.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: None at this time.
SUMMARY: A City Council Workshop Planning Committee (Jake Spano, Steve Hallfin, and
Gregg Lindberg) met with consultant Jenny Welch to help develop the direction of the
workshop. This group met on January 23 to review both the survey information and the
discussion at the January 10 City Council Study Session.
Based on the Planning Committees work, the draft Outcomes, Agenda and Workshop Guidelines
have been prepared and staff desires input from the Council in order to help staff finalize
planning for the workshop.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a well-maintained and
diverse housing stock.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Tentative Outcomes and Agenda for Thursday, February 27
& Friday, February 28
Workshop Guidelines
Prepared by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Workshop
February 27-28, 2014
Desired Outcomes for City Council Workshop
• To continue to build a foundation for a high functioning/high performing City Council
• To achieve mutual understanding of the current state of housing in St. Louis Park and current and
future market trends.
• To achieve clarity on each Councilmembers views/feelings regarding the existing Housing Goals
and Policies.
• To identify those areas of the existing Housing Goals and Polices that need to be amended,
eliminated or added so as to align with the Council’s vision for the future. This includes
beginning to develop a framework around housing policy relative to SWLRT.
Thursday 4:30 – 9:00 pm
1. Welcome
2. Carver Governance Model
a. A quick overview of what it is/how it works including the role of council with
staff.
b. Council members will share examples that they have noted over the past year.
Nancy Deno and Bridget Gothberg will give a short overview of the underlying Carver premises.
Then we will open the discussion about Carver and how it is working with the City Council—
what we are doing well, what is missing that would make us even more effective with Carver.
Please bring your questions.
3. Relational Learning
a. Individual styles and Communication
b. Group Development
DINNER: Approximately at 6:00 p.m.
4. Facilitated Dialogue
a. Review unwritten rules
b. Conversation about our expectations of working with each other
i. Communication expectations
ii. Dealing with conflict
iii. Emails
iv. Other
c. What do we need to commit to so that we keep functioning and performing at a
high level?
5. Legal principles
a. Differences between legal principles and policy preferences
b. What CC members need to know and apply to decision-making
6. Closure
Study Session Meeting of February 10, 2014 (Item No. 4)
Title: Review Outcomes and Agenda for City Council Workshop Page 2
Friday 8:30 – 4:00 pm
8:15 Coffee and Goodies
8:30 Workshop Starts
1. Introductions & Brief Recap of Thursday night
2. Plan for the Day
a. Review process and agenda
b. Review Ground rules (see attached)
3. Undertake review of existing Housing Goals and Policies. Desired outcomes include:
a. Identify where each council member stands re: each of the City’s Housing Goals and
Policies
b. Where is each Councilmembers passion relative to housing?
c. What are non-starters?
d. Where do we have gaps in our housing policy/housing stock and how does this compare
to market trends?
e. Where do we need more information?
f. Where do we have a lack of agreement?
Lunch and Breaks will happen!
4. Future Direction
a. From the Council’s point of view, what should the City’s housing stock look like in 20-
30 years and how does this compare to expected housing trends and market?
b. What parts of the existing Housing Goals and Polices are still relevant, or should be
amended, eliminated, or added?
c. What are the elements the City Council would like to see included in housing goals and
policies for SWLRT?
5. Next Steps: Commitment
a. Identify the next steps in achieving the adoption of new Housing Goals and Polices for
the future.
6. Summarize the Day
a. Brief review of day
b. Each person checks-in
7. Adjourn
Study Session Meeting of February 10, 2014 (Item No. 4)
Title: Review Outcomes and Agenda for City Council Workshop Page 3
Proposed Guidelines for Workshop Participants
• Be present.
• Respect each other’s time
• Be concise – stay in the “Big Bowl.”
• Be prepared.
• Everyone participates / everyone listens.
• Don’t assume that you know or they know.
• When decisions are made they are not revisited unless there has been a significant change
to the context behind the decision – We will align on a process that protects us from
unnecessarily revisiting decisions that have already been made.
Study Session Meeting of February 10, 2014 (Item No. 4)
Title: Review Outcomes and Agenda for City Council Workshop Page 4
Meeting: Study Session
Meeting Date: February 10, 2014
Written Report: 5
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Proposed Allocation of 2014 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds
RECOMMENDED ACTION: No action required at this time. This report is being provided to
inform the Council of the proposed allocation of 2014 CDBG funds.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council concur with the recommendations made
for the allocation of $195,859 in 2014 CDBG funds?
SUMMARY: Each year the City must decide how to use its annual allocation of CDBG Funds.
CDBG funds are US Housing and Urban Development (HUD) funds distributed through
Hennepin County. The allocation amount for cities within the county is based on a calculation of
2010 census poverty data. The City must submit its proposed use of the allocation to Hennepin
County by February 27th. Prior to submittal, the City must hold a public hearing. The hearing
and official City Council action is scheduled for February 18th.
This year’s proposed use of CDBG funds reflects the City’s priorities to preserve existing
housing and increase affordable ownership opportunities. Ninety-six percent of the allocation, or
$188,359 of the $195,859, focuses on assisting low-income residents with emergency repairs,
rehab loans and affordable ownership opportunities. The remaining amount is proposed for youth
park programming at Meadowbrook Manor Park.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: CDBG funds allow cities discretion (within
the HUD guidelines) to fund projects that meet the national low income objectives and the needs
of cities. CDBG funding is expected to remain close to the fiscal year 2013 funding level;
however, the federal budget has yet to be finalized. 2013 funding levels will be used for planning
purposes until the 2014 allocation is finalized. St. Louis Park will receive an estimated $195,859
in 2014. The 2014 CDBG year runs from July 1, 2014 through December 31, 2015. Staff
anticipates the proposed projects can expend the funds in a timely manner as has been our
historical practice of fully expending CDBG funds. Final funding amount may vary slightly
from the estimate. Staff will keep Council apprised of actual funding amounts.
VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a well-maintained and
diverse housing stock.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion
Proposed Program Descriptions
Draft Resolution
Prepared by: Marney Olson, Housing Programs Coordinator
Reviewed by: Michele Schnitker, Housing Supervisor
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
Study Session Meeting of February 10, 2014 (Item No. 5) Page 2
Title: Proposed Allocation of 2014 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds
DISCUSSION
BACKGROUND: The national objectives of the CDBG program are to benefit low and
moderate-income persons, prevention or elimination of slum or blight and/or to meet a particular
urgent community development need. From a policy perspective, the City Council has typically
focused CDBG funds on “sticks and bricks” improvements to the housing stock for low-income
families, for both single-family (SF) owners and multifamily housing residents. A small portion
of funds have also been allocated to support public services for St. Louis Park Housing Authority
(SLPHA) residents and park programming for low-income youth.
PRESENT CONSIDERATIONS: The proposed use of CDBG funds reflects the City’s
priorities to preserve existing housing and increase affordable ownership opportunities. This
year’s proposed allocation is summarized in Table 1 below. Ninety-six percent of the allocation,
or $188,359 of the $195,859, focuses on assisting low-income residents with emergency repairs,
rehab loans, home renovations and affordable ownership opportunities. The remaining amount is
proposed for youth park programming at Meadowbrook Manor Park.
Historically, the City has allocated CDBG funds to non-profit affordable housing providers to
assist with their building renovations. Both PPL and Perspectives require water main
replacement for buildings at Louisiana Court which provides housing to low-income residents.
Table 1: Proposed 2014 CDBG Allocation
Project Activity
Proposed Ongoing
Activity Allocation
Low Income Single Family Emergency Repair Program $45,000 yes
Low Income Single Family Home Rehab Loan $60,000 yes
Affordable Housing Land Trust – Homes within Reach $20,000 yes
St. Louis Park Housing Authority – Rehab for scattered site home $23,359 yes
Perspectives, Inc. – Water Main Replacement at Louisiana Court $20,000 no
PPL – Water Main Replacement at Louisiana Court $20,000 No
Public Service – Youth Park Programming at Meadowbrook Park $7,500 yes
Total $195,859
NEXT STEPS: The St. Louis Park Housing Authority (SLPHA) will review and discuss the
proposed allocation at its February 12, 2014 meeting. The Commissioners’ comments will be
shared at the Public Hearing on February 18, 2014. The following actions are required to
receive 2014 CDBG funds:
February 6, 2014 Publication of Public Hearing Notice
February 18, 2014 Public Hearing and Approval of Resolution Outlining Proposed Activities
February 27, 2014 Deadline for Submission of CDBG Application to Hennepin County
Study Session Meeting of February 10, 2014 (Item No. 5) Page 3
Title: Proposed Allocation of 2014 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds
Proposed Program Descriptions
Emergency Repair Program – Single Family $45,000
This program is consistent with the Council’s focus on stick and bricks and has proven its
responsiveness to low income seniors and vulnerable residents with annual incomes of 50% or
less of the median area income, or $29,050 for a single person household, and assets less than
$25,000. It provides grants of up to $4,000 for emergencies such as leaking roofs, plumbing
repairs and water heaters. Community Action Partners for Suburban Hennepin County (CAPSH)
currently administers this program for the City. This is an ongoing CDBG activity.
Low Income Single Family Deferred Loan Program- $60,000
This is the primary ongoing CDBG rehab loan program targeted for homeowners with annual income
of 50% or less of the median area income, or $41,450 for a household of 4, and assets less than
$25,000. The rehab focuses on improvements to bring homes into code compliance and provide long-
term maintenance free housing. The maximum loan amount is $25,000 and is forgiven after 15 years.
Repayment is required if homeowners sell the property before the 15-year period expires.
The demand for our low-income home improvement loans and grants continues to be high. Despite
ongoing funding there is still a waiting list for the low income single family deferred loan program.
Continued funding, along with the program income realized from repayment of previous CDBG
deferred loans, should make it possible to serve three to five residents. This program is administered
by Hennepin County Housing staff.
Affordable Housing Land Trust – Homes within Reach $20,000
Homes within Reach is a program of West Hennepin Housing Land Trust that purchases homes
and sells them to low income homeowners. Buyers pay for the cost of the building only and
lease the land for 99 years. St. Louis Park funds are leveraged with Met Council and Hennepin
County HOME funds, and Homes within Reach administers this activity. Homes within Reach
have purchased twelve homes in the city that have been sold to low income families.
St. Louis Park Housing Authority – renovation of a scattered site home - $23,359
The SLP Housing Authority provides housing to low income residents that are typically below
50% median income. The HA owns and manages 37 scattered site homes throughout the city.
The HA has requested $23,359 to assist with replacing windows, new siding and a new roof at
4316 which is one of the single family scattered site homes.
PPL Louisiana Court Apartments Water Main Replacement- $20,000
The Louisiana Court Apartments are a collection of 1960’s-era apartment buildings each housing
between 12 -16 dwelling units. PPL serves residents with households earning less that 60% of
area median income (AMI). Project ownership is committed to maintaining the integrity of this
valuable, affordable housing resource and since 2000 has completed numerous, substantial
upgrades to the premises. To date, eight of 11 water mains have been replaced on the premises.
The remaining three PPL buildings requiring the upgrade are: 2711, 2740 and 2742. The project
will tear out and install a new water main from the city street to the residential building. CDBG
funds will assist in financing the water main replacement.
Study Session Meeting of February 10, 2014 (Item No. 5) Page 4
Title: Proposed Allocation of 2014 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds
Perspectives Louisiana Court Water Main Replacement - $20,000
This project involves the replacement of the water main that extends from the City’s main to
2753 Louisiana Court. The project also involves moving the present water meter to a more
accessible location, as well as providing the necessary restoration after completion. Perspectives
has incurred at least seven water main leaks to the Louisiana Court apartments during the past
10 years. These repairs have been very costly, ranging from $5,000 - $8,500. They have also
been disruptive, as they involved tearing up the pavement and sidewalk. During this time,
Perspectives has replaced the water mains at four of their five buildings. The 2753 apartment
building currently houses twelve permanent housing families through HUD's Shelter + Care
Rental Assistance program (the Housing Authority of St Louis Park administers this funding).
Criteria for this housing is that residents are homeless and have a disability (chronic substance
abuse) at program entry. In addition, all clients must meet income guidelines at program entry –
they are at or below very low income (30 percent of medium adjusted income). All participants
are single heads of household, with one to four children. Seventy-two percent are persons of
color. CDBG funds will assist in financing this project.
Public Service – SLP Park and Rec. Programming at Meadowbrook Manor Parks - $7,500
The Park and Recreation Department provides park programming to children at the
Meadowbrook Manor Apartment Community. The $7,500 would provide an enhanced level of
programming and ensure affordable registration fees. The youth park programming has been
funded with CDBG funds since 2007. Meadowbrook Manor Park is CDBG eligible based on
the poverty levels in this neighborhood.
Study Session Meeting of February 10, 2014 (Item No. 5) Page 5
Title: Proposed Allocation of 2014 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds
DRAFT RESOLUTION NO. 14 - ____
RESOLUTION APPROVING PROPOSED USE OF 2014 URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM FUNDS AND
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENT WITH HENNEPIN
COUNTY AND ANY THIRD PARTY AGREEMENTS
WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park, through execution of a Joint Cooperation
Agreement with Hennepin County, is cooperating in the Urban Hennepin County Community
Development Block Grant Program; and
WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park has developed a proposal for the use of 2014
Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant funds made available to it; and
WHEREAS, the City held a public hearing on February 18, 2014 to obtain the views of
citizens on housing and community development needs and priorities and the City's proposed use
of $195,859 from the 2014 Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant.
BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of St. Louis Park approves the following
projects for funding from the 2014 Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block
Grant Program and authorizes submittal of the proposal to Hennepin County.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby authorizes and directs the
Mayor and its City Manager to execute the Subrecipient Agreement and any required Third Party
Agreement on behalf of the City to implement the 2014 Community Development Block Grant
Program.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that should the final amount of FY2014 CDBG
available to the city be different from the preliminary amount provided to the city, the City
Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to adjust project budget(s) to reflect an increase or
decrease in funding.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council February 18, 2014
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Project Activity Allocation
Low Income Single Family Emergency Repair Program $45,000
Low Income Single Family Home Rehab Loan $60,000
Affordable Housing Land Trust – Homes within Reach $20,000
St. Louis Park Housing Authority – Rehab for scattered site home $23,359
PPL – Water Main Replacement at Louisiana Court $20,000
Perspectives – Water Main Replacement at Louisiana Court $20,000
Public Service – Youth Park Programming at Meadowbrook Park $7,500
Total $195,859
Meeting: Study Session
Meeting Date: February 10, 2014
Written Report: 6
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Highway 169 – Noise Wall Project
RECOMMENDED ACTION: No action required. The purpose of this item is to provide
Council with an update on MnDOT’s proposal to install a noise wall along the east side of
Highway 169 between 14th and 16th Street West.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: Is the City Council supportive of MnDOT undertaking this
improvement?
SUMMARY: In March 2011, MnDOT presented the City Council with various options for
future noise walls and access closures along Highway 169. The locations were based on noise
abatement studies and traffic safety initiatives. The plan that was presented included the
proposed noise wall along the east side of Highway 169 from 14th to 16th Street W. (Figure 1).
MnDOT and city staff returned last January to provide another update to the Council on this
project. Council was comfortable with the public process proceeding on this improvement.
In order to understand the level of resident support for the installation of noise wall in this
location MnDOT staff held a public meeting on Wednesday, January 29. 106 properties were
invited to attend the meeting, and 6 people attended. A comment card was available at the
meeting. Six cards were returned, and all indicated support of the construction of the noise wall.
This project will be brought to the City Council on February 18 to ask for a resolution of support.
If approved, construction would begin in late summer 2014.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The noise wall north of 16th Street is a
MnDOT led project with an estimated cost of $434,000. In accordance with MnDOT’s noise
wall policy the City is responsible for 10% of the project cost, approximately $43,000. The City
would use State Aid funding for this project.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Figure 1 – Noise Barrier Graphic
Figure 2 – Noise Barrier Analysis
Prepared by: Debra M. Heiser, Engineering Director
Reviewed by: Phillip Elkin, Senior Engineering Project Manager
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
Study Session Meeting of February 10, 2014 (Item No. 6)
Title: Highway 169 – Noise Wall Project Page 2
Study Session Meeting of February 10, 2014 (Item No. 6) Title: Highway 169 – Noise Wall ProjectPage 3
Meeting: Study Session
Meeting Date: February 10, 2014
Written Report: 7
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Highway 169 – W. 16th Street Access Closure
RECOMMENDED ACTION: No action required. The purpose of this item is to update
Council on MnDOT’s proposal to close the ramp access to Highway 169 at W. 16th Street in
advance of MnDOT starting the public process on this matter.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: None at this time. Please inform staff of any question or
concerns you might have.
SUMMARY: In March 2011, MnDOT presented the City Council with various options for
future noise walls and access closures along Highway 169. The locations were based on noise
abatement studies and traffic safety initiatives. The plan that was presented included the
proposed noise wall along the east side of Highway 169 from W. 14th to W. 16th Street as well
as the proposed access closure at W. 16th Street (Figure 1). At the January 13, 2014 study
session staff provided a brief update on this matter.
The potential access closure at W. 16th Street is being considered separately from the noise wall
because of separate funding sources and different property owner concerns. The timeline
MnDOT has provided for this closure proposal is approximately one month behind the schedule
for the noise wall, but if approved would be implemented at the same time as the noise wall
north of W. 16th Street.
The proposed closure is a part of MnDOT’s long term safety initiative for Highway 169. This
proposed project includes the installation of a 10 ft. high visual barrier wall along the east side of
Highway 169 from W. 16th Street south to the edge of wetland/City property. This would be
similar to the closure that occurred at W. 22nd and 23rd Streets along Highway 169 in 2012. Both
the ramp closure and the visual barrier wall would be fully paid for by MnDOT.
MnDOT staff would like to begin the public process to understand the level of resident and
council support for the closure of the ramp access for Highway 169 at W. 16th Street. To kick off
the process, MnDOT will hold an open house for this project at the end of February.
A traffic study has been completed to understand the traffic impacts to the closure of W. 16th
Street at Highway 169. The study indicates that there are only minor impacts to traffic
conditions of the surrounding roadways and intersections.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The closure of the Highway 169 ramp
access at W. 16th Street is a MnDOT led project with an estimated cost of $800,000. Both the
ramp closure and the visual barrier wall would be fully paid for by MnDOT.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Figure 1 - 16th Street Graphic
Prepared by: Debra M. Heiser, Engineering Director
Reviewed by: Phillip Elkin, Senior Engineering Project Manager
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
ÑÐ
TEXAS AVERH ODE ISL AND AVEWAYZAT A B L V D
2 8 T H S T
F O R D R D
S HELARD PKWY
31ST ST
C
LUB RD
26TH STMELROSEAVEFRANKLINAVE
VIRGINIA CIR
22ND ST
2 9T H S T 25TH S T18THST
QUEBEC AVEUTAH AVESUMTER AVEAQUILAAVE2 2N D S T
WAYZATA BLVD
TEXAS AVEFL
AGA
V
E
FORD RDCEDAR
L
A
K
E
R
D
16T H ST
32ND STWESTWOODHILLSDRWESTWOOD HILLSDR30 1/2 ST
14TH ST
BOONEAVEBOONEAVE
WE
ST
M
ORELANDLNUTAHDRQUE
B
ECA
VE
Q UEBECAVEX YLONAVEXYLON AVEXYLON AVE22ND LNJORDAN AVEUTAH AVEUTAHAVESUMTERAVEBURD
PL
S TANLEN RD
CA
V
E
L
L
AVECAVELL AVECAVELL AVEKILMER AVEKILMERAVEPARKE
RRD
13TH LN
13TH LN
WYOMINGAVE13 1/2 ST
FORD LN
INDEPENDENCEAVEINDEPENDENCEAVEINDEPENDENCE AVE24TH ST W VIRGINIAAVE
VIRGINIAAV E
VIRGINIA AVEY U KONAVEGETTYSBURGAVEH ILLSBOROAVEHI
L
LSBOROAVEHILLSBOROAVELANCASTERAVEDECATURAVEDECATUR AVELNFAIRWAYLNENSIGNAVETE X A TONKAAVEPRKR24TH
LN WESTWOODHILLS CRV
BOONECTTEXAS
CIR
FORD
CIR
28TH S
TAQUILAA
VE
31ST
STAQUILAAVEFLAG AVE24TH ST
22ND
ST
14T H S T
FLAG AVE1 6 T H ST
ZINR AN AVE31STST
23RD ST
18TH ST
25TH ST
1 8 T H S T
24TH
ST
23RD ST
23RD
ST
FR A N K L I N A V E
16TH ST
COBBLECREST CTProposed MNDOT Highway 169 and 16th StreetNoise Wall, Visual Barrier Wall, and Ramp Closure
Created 1/7/14by Luke Ingram
M
0 840 1,680 2,520 3,360Feet
MNDOT Proposed Projects
ÑÐ 16th St. Northbound Ramp Closure
16th St. Visual Barrier Wall
16th St. Noisewall
HWY 394
HWY 169Cedar Lake Rd
MinneapolisGolf ClubGeneral Mills Blvd.Study Session Meeting of February 10, 2014 (Item No. 7)
Title: Highway 169 – W. 16th Street Access Closure Page 2
Meeting: Study Session
Meeting Date: February 10, 2014
Written Report: 8
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: EDA Redevelopment Contract Status Report
RECOMMENDED ACTION: None.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
SUMMARY: The attached report summarizes the current status of various redevelopment
projects in the city to which the EDA is a party. Its purpose is to apprise city officials of any
current issues or anticipated actions that may need to be considered relative to corresponding
redevelopment contracts.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: EDA Redevelopment Contract Status Report
Prepared by: Julie Grove, Economic Development & Planning Assistant
Greg Hunt, Economic Development Coordinator
Reviewed by: Michele Schnitker, Housing Supervisor
Approved by: Tom Harmening, EDA Executive Director and City Manager
EDA Redevelopment Contract Status Report
Februrary 2014
138 market rate apartments 12/1/2015 0% Leased Construction has not commenced.
Pending Contract Actions :
58 market rate apartments 3/1/2014 98% leased Building completed.
Building renovation 12/1/2012 100%
Leased
Building renovation complete and is
leased to House of Sport .
Pending Contract Actions :
18,000 SF building renovation 12/1/2011 100%
Leased
Building renovation complete and is
leased to 5 businesses with a total of
32 employees
Pending Contract Actions :
(CKJ Properties, LLC)
Entirety of Construction Assistance issued. Monitoring remaining contract compliance.
Status of Lookback: NA
6414/6416 W. Lake Rd-former Home Hardware
(CAR Properties)
Entirety of Construction Assistance issued. Monitoring remaining contract compliance.
Status of Lookback: NA
Former Bikemasters Bldg Renovation
Pending Contract Actions :
Developer needs to submit qualified costs in order for the EDA to issue TIF Note. Monitoring Green
Policy compliance.
Status of Lookback:
Lookback to occur prior to issuance of TIF Note.
Developer is earnestly seeking project financing. Hunt needs to provide School District with an
executed construction contract by March 5th or purchase agreement will be terminated.
Status of Lookback:
Lookback would occur upon project reaching 95% lease-up.
e2 -“Ellipse on Excelsior II”
(Bader Development)
Project (Developer)
Required
Completion
Date
Percent
Sold &/or
Leased
Current Project Status
Eliot Park Apartments
(Hunt Associates)
Page 1 of 7
Study Session Meeting of February 10, 2014 (Item No. 8)
Title: EDA Redevelopment Contract Status Report Page 2
EDA Redevelopment Contract Status Report
Februrary 2014
33,600 SF building renovation 12/31/2012 100%
Occupied
Building renovations completed.
Hardcoat is fully operational.
115 senior assisted living rentals 12/31/2012 61% Leased
10,000 SF retail space 12/31/2012 75% Leased
132 market rate apartments 3/1/2011 96%
16,394 SF commercial 3/1/2011 100%
Leased
67,000 SF medical office bldg 6/30/2009
100%
Occupied by
PN
Building completed.
Status of Lookback:
Completed; no adjustment to TIF Note required.
Melrose Eating Disorders Institute
(Park Nicollet Methodist Hospital)
Pending Contract Actions : None.
Status of Lookback:
Lookback will occur once building reaches 95% lease-up.
Ellipse on Excelsior
(Bader Development)
Building completed.
Pending Contract Actions : None
TowerLight (formerly Wooddale Catered Living)
(Greco Development)
Building completed.
Pending Contract Actions :
Stormwater drainage issue needs to be rectified before TIF Note can be issued.
Former Flame Metal Bldg Renovation
(Hardcoat Inc)
Pending Contract Actions:
Entirety of Construction Assistance issued. Staff is monitoring remaining contract compliance.
Status of Lookback: NA
Project (Developer)
Required
Completion
Date
Percent
Sold &/or
Leased
Current Project Status
Page 2 of 7
Study Session Meeting of February 10, 2014 (Item No. 8)
Title: EDA Redevelopment Contract Status Report Page 3
EDA Redevelopment Contract Status Report
Februrary 2014
Leasing actively continuing.
Baker & Associates leased
20,122 SF of office space.
120 unit apt.bldg. (The Flats at
West End)12/31/2016 100%
Leased Construction completed spring 2013.
1.1 million SF office space
between 3 or 4 Class A office
bldgs.
6/1/2021 0% Leased
Construction will likely commence
on first bldg once an anchor tennant
is secured.
Lake St Office Center
4,000 SF medical office building 12/31/2009
100%
Leased Building completed.
Pending Contract Actions :
Status of Lookback:
None. DEED Contamination Cleanup Grant successfully closed in September 2011.
To be completed.
Pending Contract Actions :
The initial TIF Note was approved 5/17/10. Redeveloper has indicated it may request the TIF Note be
reissued as two separate Notes; this would require EDA action.
Status of Lookback: Lookback will occur once buildings reach 95% lease-up, the date of any
transfer or three years after issuance of Certificate of Completion. C of C was issued 2/12/13.
(Real Estate Recycling)
350,000 SF retail/restaurant 6/1/2010 79% Leased
28,00 SF 2nd floor office space 6/1/2010 100%
Leased
Project (Developer)
Required
Completion
Date
Percent
Sold &/or
Leased
Current Project Status
The West End
(Duke Realty)
Page 3 of 7
Study Session Meeting of February 10, 2014 (Item No. 8)
Title: EDA Redevelopment Contract Status Report Page 4
EDA Redevelopment Contract Status Report
Februrary 2014
(Real Estate Recycling)
79,000 SF office/tech bldg 12/31/2007 84% leased Building completed.
Pending Contract Actions :
Status of Lookback:
Hoigaard Village
“Harmony Vista” – 74 units, 2/28/2008 92% leased Building completed.
25,000 SF retail 90% leased
“The Camerata” – 220 units 9/1/2008 90% leased Building completed.
“The Adagio” – 100 units 12/31/2013 55% leased Building completed.
“Medley Row” – 22 townhomes 12/31/2013 46% leased Building completed.
Pending Contract Actions :
Status of Lookback:
27-unit loft condo building 12/31/2006 100% Sold Building completed.
14-unit townhouse building 12/31/2006 100% Sold Building completed.
5 single family houses 12/31/2006 100% Sold
Aquila Commons
106 unit senior housing
cooperative
12/31/2007 98% Sold Building completed
2 units remain unsold.
units.
Pending Contract Actions :
Staff is monitoring compliance with income requirements. Monitoring will cease upon sale of last
Status of Lookback: Lookback to occurr upon sale of all units.
To occur three years after the issusance of the final Certificate of Completion.
Brookside Lofts
(Master Dev & Foundation Land)
Pending Contract Actions : None
(Stonebridge Dev)
Highway 7 Corporate Center
None. The long term future of the Purple Parking Lot is subject to SWLRT planning and the Gold
Parking Lot is subject to Highway 7 & Louisiana Avenue interchange construction.
Completed; no adjustment to TIF Note required. DEED Contamination Cleanup Grant successfully
closed.
(Union Land II Dunbar Development )
Final TIF Notes of $820,000 and $200,000 related to last two stages to be authorized and issued.
Project (Developer)
Required
Completion
Date
Percent
Sold &/or
Leased
Current Project Status
Page 4 of 7
Study Session Meeting of February 10, 2014 (Item No. 8)
Title: EDA Redevelopment Contract Status Report Page 5
EDA Redevelopment Contract Status Report
Februrary 2014
78 Townhomes 6/1/2007 100% Sold Building completed.
66 loft-style condominiums 6/1/2007 100% Sold Building completed.
60 senior condominiums 6/1/2007 100% Sold Building completed.
79,000 SF office/warehouse 12/4/2004
100%
Leased Building completed.
2-story, 54,742 SF office bldg 3/31/2004 96% Leased Building completed.
1-story, 10,038 SF commercial
“West” bldg 5/31/2005 100 %
Leased Building completed.
None.
Pending Contract Actions :
None
Status of Lookback:
Completed; no adjustment to TIF Note required. DEED Contamination Cleanup Grant successfully
closed.
Wolfe Lake Professional Center
(Belt Line Industrial Park, Inc)
Status of Lookback:
Completed; no adjustment to TIF Note required.
Edgewood Business Center
(Real Estate Recycling)
Pending Contract Actions :
Village In The Park
(Rottlund Homes)
Pending Contract Actions :
TIF Note paid off February 1, 2010.
Project (Developer)
Required
Completion
Date
Percent
Sold &/or
Leased
Current Project Status
Page 5 of 7
Study Session Meeting of February 10, 2014 (Item No. 8)
Title: EDA Redevelopment Contract Status Report Page 6
EDA Redevelopment Contract Status Report
Februrary 2014
Phase I – 338 apts, 62,700 SF
retail space 7/1/2003 Apts 91.2%
Leased.Building completed.
Phase NE-124 Condos, 4,500
retail space 4/30/2006 Condos
100% Sold.Building completed.
Phase E – 86 condos & 14,235 SF
retail space 4/1/2006 Retail 91%
Leased.Building completed.
Phase NW – 96 condos, up to
5,000 SF retail space 6/1/2007 Condos
100% Sold.Building completed.
30 condos & 11,200 SF
commercial space 12/1/2001 100% Sold
& Leased Building completed.
200 market rate apartments 6/1/2002 99% leased Building completed.
Zarthan & 16th Street
Marriott Springhill Ste-127 units 3/1/2002 Hotel Building completed.
Marriott TownePlace Ste-107
units 8/1/2001 Hotel Building completed.
86 owner occupied townhomes 1/1/2003 100% Sold Building completed.
(CSM Hospitality & Rottlund Homes)
Pending Contract Actions : None.
Pending Contract Actions :
None. DEED Contamination Cleanup Grant successfully closed.
Louisiana Oaks
(MSP Real Estate)
Pending Contract Actions :
None. DEED Contamination Cleanup Grant successfully closed.
(TOLD Development)
Pending Contract Actions : None.
Fern Hill
(Park Land Company)
Project (Developer)
Required
Completion
Date
Percent
Sold &/or
Leased
Current Project Status
Excelsior & Grand
Page 6 of 7
Study Session Meeting of February 10, 2014 (Item No. 8)
Title: EDA Redevelopment Contract Status Report Page 7
EDA Redevelopment Contract Status Report
Februrary 2014
45 unit assisted living facility 6/1/2001 100%
Occupied Building completed.
72 duplex townhomes 12/1/2002 100% Sold Buildings completed.
49,310 SF medical office 5/7/2001 100%
Occupied Building completed.
50,690 SF medical office 12/31/2006 Building was not completed.
45,000 SF medical office 12/31/2010 Building was not completed.
Pending Contract Actions :
Contract terminated upon last TIF payment on 8/1/12; TIF district was decertified 7/1/13.
(SVK Development)
Pending Contract Actions :
Contract terminated upon last TIF payment on 8/1/13; TIF district was decertified 11/18/13.
PNMC – Phase II
(Park Nicollet Health Services)
Park Center
(Silver Crest Properties)
Pending Contract Actions :
Staff is monitoring Redeveloper’s adherence to renter income restrictions as specified in Contract.
Victoria Ponds
Project (Developer)
Required
Completion
Date
Percent
Sold &/or
Leased
Current Project Status
Page 7 of 7
Study Session Meeting of February 10, 2014 (Item No. 8)
Title: EDA Redevelopment Contract Status Report Page 8
Meeting: Study Session
Meeting Date: February 10, 2014
Written Report: 9
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Annual Open to Business Program Update
RECOMMENDED ACTION: None
POLICY CONSIDERATION: This report provides an annual update on the Open to Business
program which provides small business technical assistance services to St. Louis Park businesses
and residents.
SUMMARY: Under its contract with the EDA, the Metropolitan Consortium of Community
Developers (MCCD) is required to provide periodic updates detailing the small business
technical services provided in St. Louis Park under its Open to Business program. The last
update provided information on the program for activities during the first half of 2013. This
latest update covers activities from January to December 2013.
During the past year, MCCD staff met with 29 would-be entrepreneurs and existing small
businesses seeking assistance with a wide variety of business ventures. In that period MCCD
provided 120 hours of service in the city. These services included business entity advice,
business plan development, loan packaging, feasibility analysis, lease review/negotiations,
strategic planning, business purchase evaluation, operations and logistic planning, cash flow
analysis, network referrals, record keeping, marketing, personal financial planning, real estate
analysis, registration, licensing and regulatory. The “Test Drive Your Business Idea” counseling
sessions continue to experience increasing activity and are expected to accelerate as word of the
program continues to spread.
In 2013, the Open to Business program provided a $12,000 loan for a St. Louis Park guitar shop
to increase inventory; worked with a local resident to develop and implement a business plan as
well as access start-up capital to start a tap room in Minneapolis; assisted a local entrepreneur
assemble financial projections and secure a $40,000 loan. Last year a total of 21 jobs were
retained or created as a result of the Open to Business program in St. Louis Park.
Counseling sessions occur the fourth Monday of each month from 9 a.m.to 11 a.m. at City Hall
or by appointment at the place of business. There is no charge to those receiving these services.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Annual Report from MCCD
Prepared by: Julie Grove, Planning & Economic Development Assistant
Greg Hunt, Economic Development Coordinator
Reviewed by: Michele Schnitker, Housing Supervisor
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager and EDA Executive Director
Study Session Meeting of February 10, 2014 (Item No. 9) Page 2
Title: Annual Open to Business Program Update
City:
Time Frame:
Clients Served:
New Entrepreneur/Start-up 16
Existing Business 13
Total 29
How did client hear about OTB:
• Municipality (newsletter) 16
• Friends/Family 3
• Entrepreneur 2
• Bank Referral 2
• Internet 4
• Other 2
Direct & Facilitated Financing closed:
# of loans 3
Amount $102,000
Capital Leveraged: $116,000
Jobs retained or created from OTB
closed loan clients: 21
Program related hours TA/Admin: 120
Types of Services Provided:
Business
feasibility
Business
plan
development
Business
Purchase
evaluation
Lease
review/
negotiation
Loan
packaging
Strategic
planning
Operations
and logistic
planning
Record
keeping
Network/referrals
Regulatory
assistance
Real estate
analysis
Cash flow
analysis/
projections
Personal
Financial
planning
Marketing Business
registration/
licensing
St. Louis Park
1/1/13-12/31/13
Industry Segment:
Service 15
Retail-general merchandise 8
Retail-food related 3
Manufacturing-other 2
Technology 1
Types of Businesses:
Family and
Marriage
therapists
Micro distillery Personal
training facility
Dog walking,
pet sitting
Efficiency
consultant
Micro Brewer
- Tap Room
Sports
products
Clothing
alteration
Political
consulting
Anodizing
metal
business
Marketing and
advertising
Home staging
Professional
design
collective and
Retail
Boutique
Software
developer
Track and
field club
Staffing for
Life Science
Industry
Coffee Shop Bike store
Corporate
consulting
Marketing and
advertising
Guitar supply
store
Study Session Meeting of February 10, 2014 (Item No. 9) Page 3
Title: Annual Open to Business Program Update
Client Highlights:
El Diablo Inc.
Business Type: Amps & guitar store
Location: 6415 Walker St
Referred by: Entrepreneur
OTB Financing: $12,000
Jobs created/retained: 1
El Diablo, Inc. retails high-end “boutique” music gear. In 2012, owner Alan Estevez
moved the business from his home to a small showroom in St. Louis Park. With sales
growing, Alan needed to purchase additional inventory. OTB provided the business with
a $12,000 loan to help him increase his inventory. Technical assistance also was
provided to help the entrepreneur develop a staged growth plan.
Sisyphus Brewing
Business Type: Retail Tap Room
Location: Minneapolis
Referred by: Municipality
Other Financing/Equity: $116,000
Jobs created/retained: 2
Helped St. Louis Park resident develop and implement a business plan to develop a retail
tap room. Worked with entrepreneur on accessing the start-up capital and advised on real
estate, regulatory and build out issues. He is currently of going through the licensing
process and plans to open the tap room in April 2014.
Pellicano Endurance Coaching
Business Type: Personal Training Facility
Location: 4930 35th St. W
Referred by: Banker
Other Financing/Equity: $40,000
Jobs created/retained: 2
Danielle Pellicano had been in business as a professional athletic coach since 2007 and wanted
to find a space of her own. Open to Business advisor referred her to a realtor who found a
space for her in St. Louis Park. Our advisor helped her put together financial projections
including a cash flow and presented her request on her behalf to Park State Bank. She was
approved for a $40,000 loan that enabled her to move to her current location. OTB continues to
provide assistance with bookkeeping issues and general business issues acting as an advisor
and sounding board for ideas. Her revenues increased 66% last year from the previous year.
Testimonial from St. Louis Park client:
“Thanks, Rob! That's fabulous and very helpful! The numbers certainly support the idea that folks are
spending a big chunk of their food dollar away from home.” Email from SLP client after receiving
some market analysis information – 2/5/13