The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2014/04/21 - ADMIN - Agenda Packets - City Council - Regular AGENDA APRIL 21, 2014 6:00 p.m. SPECIAL STUDY SESSION – Council Chambers Discussion Items 1. 6:00 p.m. Southwest LRT Update 2. 6:30 p.m. Review of City’s Housing Goals 7:30 p.m. CITY COUNCIL MEETING – Council Chambers 1. Call to Order 1a. Pledge of Allegiance 1b. Roll Call 2. Presentations 2a. Presentation Accepting Monetary Donation from the Rotary Club of St. Louis Park for the Summer Concert Series ($1,000) 3. Approval of Minutes -- None 4. Approval of Agenda and Items on Consent Calendar NOTE: The Consent Calendar lists those items of business which are considered to be routine and/or which need no discussion. Consent items are acted upon by one motion. If discussion is desired by either a Councilmember or a member of the audience, that item may be moved to an appropriate section of the regular agenda for discussion. The items for the Consent Calendar are listed on the last page of the Agenda. Recommended Action: Motion to approve the Agenda as presented and items listed on the Consent Calendar; and to waive reading of all resolutions and ordinances. (Alternatively: Motion to add or remove items from the agenda, or move items from Consent Calendar to regular agenda for discussion.) 5. Boards and Commissions -- None 6. Public Hearings -- None 7. Requests, Petitions, and Communications from the Public -- None 8. Resolutions, Ordinances, Motions and Discussion Items -- None 9. Communications -- None Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. To make arrangements, please call the Administration Department at 952/924-2525 (TDD 952/924-2518) at least 96 hours in advance of meeting. Meeting of April 21, 2014 City Council Agenda CONSENT CALENDAR 4a. Adopt Resolution approving acceptance of a monetary donation from the Rotary Club of St. Louis Park in the amount of $1,000 for the Recreation Division’s Summer Concert Series. 4b. Adopt Resolution Amending and Restating the Final Planned Unit Development for the West End Redevelopment Project. 4c. Adopt Resolution accepting the contents and recommendations of the Southwest Corridor Investment Framework pertaining to St. Louis Park. 4d. Adopt Resolution authorizing installation of restricted parking - loading zone on Webster Avenue, just north of 36th Street. 4e. Adopt Resolution authorizing installation of stop signs on Oregon Avenue at 29th Street. 4f. Approve for filing Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission Minutes February 19, 2014. St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority and regular City Council meetings are carried live on Civic TV cable channel 17 and replays are frequent; check www.parktv.org for the schedule. The meetings are also streamed live on the internet at www.parktv.org, and saved for Video on Demand replays. The agenda is posted on Fridays on the official city bulletin board in the lobby of City Hall and on the text display on Civic TV cable channel 17. The agenda and full packet are available by noon on Friday on the city’s website. Meeting: Special Study Session Meeting Date: April 21, 2014 Discussion Item: 1 TITLE: Southwest LRT Update RECOMMENDED ACTION: Provide direction to staff on the schedule for undertaking the Municipal Consent process in St. Louis Park. POLICY CONSIDERATION: What schedule does the City Council wish to set for consideration of Municipal Consent for SWLRT? SUMMARY: On April 9, 2014 Metropolitan Council approved the base project for the SWLRT Project. (Plans are at http://www.stlouispark.org/webfiles/file/community-dev/swlrt_plans.pdf ). The next day (4/10/14) the SWLRT Project Office (SPO) distributed the official Preliminary Design Plans to all the cities along the corridor. The cities have until 45 days after the Met Council’s hearing on the proposed SWLRT plans to approve or disapprove the Preliminary Design Plans. The Met Council’s hearing is scheduled for May 12th and will be a joint hearing with Hennepin County. Therefore, St. Louis Park has until June 26th to act on the Preliminary Design plans. Each of the corridor cities is also required to have its own public hearing on the Preliminary Design Plans and we need to schedule ours. The SPO is willing to hold an open house and/or give a brief presentation on the Preliminary Design Plans the evening of the hearing if we would like them to do so. Staff is proposing that our hearing be held on Monday, May 19th with a one hour open house immediately preceding the public hearing. Staff is further suggesting that actual City Council action (approval or denial of municipal consent) on the Preliminary Design Plans would be considered at a future meeting. The proposed target date for action on Municipal Consent is June 16th with the June 23rd City Council meeting as alternate or backup. Monday night staff will briefly walk through the Preliminary Design Plans, identify issues for further discussion at future study sessions and discuss the Municipal Consent schedule. Staff is currently reviewing the plans. An initial summary of the base plan, our “Locally Requested Capital Investments” (“Betterments”) and other potential issues is provided in the attached table. NEXT STEPS: • Set and publish notice for the Public hearing with open house 1 hour prior – suggested date is May 19. • Staff and Council to continue to review base plans (ongoing) • Adopt Municipal Consent Resolution – suggested date is June 16 with June 23 as backup. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable at this time. VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged community. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: SLP Municipal Consent Plan Summary Table 2014 Prepared by: Meg J. McMonigal, Planning and Zoning Supervisor Reviewed by: Kevin Locke, Community Development Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager SLP Municipal Consent Plan Summary Table 2014 4-16-14 Base plan Elements Locally Requested Cap Inv (Betterments) Cost Other Issues Cost Louisiana § North (Oxford) station § 286 car park & ride lot § Trail connection under tracks from station to regional trail and Sam’s Club area South station location $18-23 m • Removal of South leg of switching wye • Better pedestrian connection from station to Methodist • Ownership & use of freight rail South Connect property • Oxford/Edgewood “hairpin” curve ? Wooddale § Station at Wooddale § No park & ride § Trail connection at-grade § Kiss & Ride drop-off on Yosemite and Frontage Road Trail underpass $3-3.5 m • LRT under Wooddale • Shift station location East • Xenwood underpass • Xenwood at-grade crossing • Fit with future development on frontage road $13.9 m $21 m $5 m? Belt Line § 525 park & ride lot at Beltline & CSAH 25 § Trail at-grade crossing of Beltline; crosses trains on bridge to the east § New signalized access to CSAH 25 at Lynn Ave Grade separation of Belt Line Or Trail bridge over Beltline $18-23 m $3.5-4 m • Joint Development of park & Ride lot • Design of CSAH 25 • Design of access to park & ride from CSAH 25 ? Special Study Session Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 1) Title: Southwest LRT Update Page 2 Meeting: Special Study Session Meeting Date: April 21, 2014 Discussion Item: 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Review of City’s Housing Goals RECOMMENDED ACTION: None at this time. This report is intended to provide the Council with a review of the updated City’s Housing Goals based on the housing directions discussed at the February Council Workshop. Draft updated Housing Goals incorporating the February housing directions are attached for your review and discussion. POLICY CONSIDERATION: • Do the draft updated Housing Goals appropriately incorporate the City’s current housing policy as well as the directions discussed by the Council at the February Workshop? • Does Council agree with changes to the Affordable Housing goal including the policy change related to the preservation and creation of affordable housing in St. Louis Park? SUMMARY: Housing was one topic discussed at the Council Workshop held in February. Based on the discussion, Council developed a list of housing directions/priorities reflective of where the Council thinks the City should focus its efforts to meet the housing needs of the Community in the future. Council directed staff to return to a Study Session to review updated Housing Goals that incorporate the housing directions/priorities discussed at the workshop. Council also requested that data be provided comparing the proportion of affordable housing in St. Louis Park to that of similar surrounding communities. Background material highlighting housing characteristics, including the quantity of affordable housing, demographic and economic characteristics is being developed by Maxfield Research. The data will provide a resource for further discussion of St. Louis Park’s Housing Goals, specifically policy related to affordable housing. Please note: the supplemental information from Maxwell will be provided in a separate attachment prior to the meeting. Many of the housing directions/priorities identified at the Council workshop are consistent with the policies reflected in the current Housing Goals. The revised Goals maintain the policy direction of the originally adopted Housing Goals while incorporating the new directions and streamlining the format. In addition to amending the Housing Goals to capture the new directions/priorities discussed at the workshop, Goals were reformatted to improve the organization structure by consolidating similar topics. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a well-maintained and diverse housing stock. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion 2005 Housing Goals and Updated Draft Housing Goals Maxfield Community Comparisons Prepared by: Michele Schnitker, Housing Coordinator Reviewed by: Kevin Locke, Community Development Director Approved by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director Special Study Session Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 2) Page 2 Title: Review of City’s Housing Goals DISCUSSION BACKGROUND: As a follow-up to the February Council workshop, Council requested data be provided comparing the proportion of affordable housing in St. Louis Park to that of similar surrounding communities. Background material highlighting housing characteristics, including the quantity of affordable housing, along with demographic and economic characteristics is being developed by Maxfield Research. The data will provide a resource for further discussion of St. Louis Park’s Housing Goals, specifically, discussion related to affordable housing policy. Please note: the supplemental information from Maxwell will be provided in a separate attachment prior to the meeting. The updated Housing Goals integrate the housing directions/priorities identified at the Council workshop with our current Housing Goals. Although there was consensus amongst Council members on the majority of the housing policy directions, differing opinions were expressed regarding affordable housing policy. Since this affordable housing topic requires further discussion, staff suggests that Council’s discussion at Monday night’s meeting focus on: • review of the affordable housing goals • time permitting, other revisions based on directions provided at the workshop will be reviewed Housing directions representing new ideas and policy directions not previously captured in the existing goals are highlighted in yellow. Some liberty was taken with the precise wording of the housing directions in incorporating them into the existing housing goals, but an attempt to capture the meaning and intent of each housing direction was maintained. Also attached are the existing Goals in their current format for reference. Current Goals: a. Housing Summit: The City’s current Housing Goals were developed during the 2003- 2005 Housing Summit process and adopted by the City Council in March 2005. The Housing Summit was held as a means to educate, revisit, and consider any necessary changes to the City’s housing policies, strategies, and goals. The Summit consisted of a series of meetings with a broad base of stakeholders that included the City Council, Planning Commission, Housing Authority Board, School Board, County Commissioner, and a business representative. The stakeholders evaluated how existing policies were meeting the needs of current residents and neighborhoods. As a result of the discussions held at these meetings, the current housing goals were developed and approved by the City Council. The Housing Goals are attached. b. Vision Strategic Direction: In 2006, the City began a second Visioning process. One of the Vision Action Teams focused on Housing. The Action Teams developed goals, specific objectives and action plans. In 2007, the Council developed four Strategic Directions as a guide for the City for the future. These four Strategic Directions continue to be key guideposts for City actions. One of those Directions addressed housing and stated the following: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a well-maintained and diverse housing stock. In particular, the City’s focus will be on the three following strategies: i. Remodeling and expanding move-up, single-family, owner-occupied homes. ii. Property maintenance to foster quality housing and community aesthetics. iii. Working towards affordable single-family home ownership throughout the City. Special Study Session Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 2) Page 3 Title: Review of City’s Housing Goals c. Comprehensive (Comp) Plan: The City’s current Housing Goals were adopted as part of the Comp Plan adopted in December 2009. The Comp Plan is the City’s official statement used to guide development, redevelopment and preservation of the City by setting forth policies, plans and programs governing land use, public facilities, economic development and urban form. The 2010 Comp Plan documents the City’s housing plan incorporating Vision St. Louis Park, the City’s Strategic Plan, and the Housing Goals. PRESENT CONSIDERATIONS: Our housing goals do not exist independent or isolated from the rest of our region. The characteristics of St. Louis Park and the housing trends of the region greatly influence both what our Housing Goals need to be and what our housing opportunities are. Our current Housing Goals and the February housing directions/priorities need to reflect those realities. Some of the key directions that are supported by the basic characteristics of St. Louis Park and the emerging housing trends are: 1. Affordability of Housing continues to be an issue in the region. The recent economic recession and downturn in the housing market reduced home prices significantly, but it also reduced household incomes even more making housing ownership less affordable overall. Meanwhile increased demand for rental housing has reduced rental housing vacancy rates and led to increasing rents. The net result is less affordable rental housing in the region. Due to the age of St. Louis Park’s rental housing stock, the City does have a significant supply of apartments offering monthly rents that are affordable to households earning 50% to 60% of Hennepin County Area Medium Income. In contrast to existing rental housing, newly constructed multi-family rental developments in St. Louis Park have been exclusively luxury developments with high rents. 2. Single-family homes are the dominant land use in St. Louis Park. Over 60% of the private land in St. Louis Park is occupied by single-family homes. Virtually all of our single-family homes are over 40 years old. Maintaining the vast majority of this housing stock and the strong neighborhoods in which they are located is a critical community goal. Ensuring the vast majority of our single family homes are well maintained has been and should continue to be a core community goal. This includes making sure our single- family homes have the characteristics that people want in a home. Encouraging both attractive, quality updating and appropriate expansions of homes should be considered part of maintaining our single-family housing stock. 3. Opportunities for new housing in St. Louis Park will predominantly be for mixed-use and higher density housing. St. Louis Park’s central location in the metro area; proximity to downtown Minneapolis; proximity to lakes, parks and trails; connections to the rich network of busy regional highways; our compact, relatively pedestrian friendly development patterns that support urban amenities like restaurants and retailors; and, existing transit service and future LRT line, all combine to make St. Louis Park a very attractive place for higher density compact development. St. Louis Park is well suited to provide housing that meets the shift in demographic trends, energy and environmental issues, the need for healthier living environments, the trend to smaller families, and the emerging preferences of “Millennial” and “Gen Y” for urban housing where the neighborhood coffee shop or restaurant is their living room, for the type of housing; and, has demonstrated it can be done to a very high standard. This housing may be or may not Special Study Session Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 2) Page 4 Title: Review of City’s Housing Goals be owner-occupied housing. For the city, a critical issue is how to ensure all housing built in St. Louis Park is high quality housing, whether it is owner occupied or not. In the end, our opportunity to control whether a home is owner occupied or renter occupied may be limited and more dependent on the market. The City should continue to focus on ensuring housing quality whether it is rental or owner occupied. The City’s housing and land use goals have reflected and should continue to reflect intent to capitalize on the opportunity we have to accommodate mixed-use and higher density housing development at key redevelopment opportunity areas like the future SWLRT station areas, the Park Commons area and the West End. Capitalizing on these opportunities is a means of increasing the diversity of housing options in St. Louis Park and integrating housing with employment opportunities. NEXT STEPS: Based on the discussion at the Council meeting, the Housing Goals will be revised to reflect the Councils comments. The revised Housing Goals will then be presented at a future Council meeting for review and further discussion if needed. Consideration to approve the Goals will occur following finalization of the revised Housing Goals. Following approval of the revised Housing Goals, staff will explore potential strategies and tools that will support and promote the housing directions/priorities identified in the Goals. Staff’s findings will be presented at a future Study Session. Special Study Session Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 2) Page 5 Title: Review of City’s Housing Goals 2005 Housing Goals City of St. Louis Park City of St. Louis Park Housing Goals The Housing Summit resulted in a set of Housing Goals that were adopted by the City Council in April 2005 and incorporated as part of the City’s 2010 Comp Plan. The goals reflect the city’s housing policy and will serve as guides to direct officials, staff, and advisory boards now and into the future. Housing Production • Promote & facilitate a balanced and sustainable housing stock to meet diverse needs both today and in the future • The City should establish target numbers of units by housing types needed to ensure life cycle housing options, with housing types disbursed throughout the city. • The City acknowledges that there is demand for different types and sizes of housing units, but due to limitations of available space and other resources, all demands cannot be fully satisfied. At the present time, the greatest deficit and need is for the creation and maintenance of detached, owner-occupied single family housing which are large enough to accommodate families. City housing efforts and resources should primarily address this need. Housing Condition and Preservation • Ensure housing is safe and well maintained. • Preserve and enhance housing quality through proactive promotional and educational activities and housing programs related to home rehab, code, and design and safety issues. Owner / Rental Ratio • The ratio of owner/rental housing should be approximately 60% owner occupied and 40% rental. • Explore traditional and non-traditional owner occupied housing options such as, but not limited to: row houses, courtyard housing, alternative housing, cluster housing, hi-rises, 3-story homes, multi-generational housing, etc. Affordable, Workforce and Supportive Housing • Promote and facilitate a mix of housing types, prices and rents that maintains a balance of affordable housing for low and moderate income households. Future affordability goals with the Met Council should be negotiated to reflect the average percentages for other first ring suburbs in Hennepin County. Special Study Session Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 2) Page 6 Title: Review of City’s Housing Goals Note: In 2004, the City’s negotiated goal for housing affordability with the Met Council was that 60-77% of the city’s owner occupied homes should be affordable for households with incomes at or below 80% of the area median income and that 37- 41% of the city’s rental homes should be affordable for households with incomes at or below 50% of the area median income. • Mixed income units should be disbursed throughout the City and not concentrated in any one area of the City or any one development. Large Homes for Families • Promote and facilitate expansion of existing homes through remodeling which adds more bedrooms and more bathrooms, 2+ car garages and other amenities. • Promote and facilitate construction of large family-size homes with more bedrooms and more bathrooms, (e.g. minimum 3+ bedrooms and 2+ bathrooms, 2+ car garage and additional amenities such as den/fourth bedroom or porch or superior architecture) suitable for families with children. Senior Housing • Promote and facilitate more housing options for seniors. Land Use • Planning Goals: o Use infill and redevelopment opportunities to help meet housing goals. o Promote higher density housing near transit corridors & employment centers. o Encourage housing density in commercial mixed use districts. • Explore and, if appropriate promote ordinances to allow development of non- traditional housing types and increased density in single family neighborhood that is compatible with surrounding neighborhood. • Explore and promote reclassification of non-residential properties and designate for housing and other purposes. Special Study Session Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 2) Page 7 Title: Review of City’s Housing Goals Revised St. Louis Park Housing Goals: Draft Promote and facilitate a balanced and enduring housing stock that offers a continuum of diverse life-cycle housing choices including affordable, senior and mixed income housing disbursed throughout the City. Single Family Homes: The City places a high priority on creating, preserving, and improving the City’s single family housing stock. • Promote the creation of family sized, large, owner-occupied, single-family housing homes with more bedrooms, more bathrooms, more amenities and 2+ car garages through the expansion of existing homes and through construction of new homes. • Proactively address blighted housing properties through code enforcement and public or private redevelopment activities such as acquisition, demo and housing replacement. • Promote high-quality architectural design standards of homes through the use of good design, quality materials and superior construction. Multi-Family: The City is committed to promoting quality high density developments, both rental and owner occupied, in appropriate locations such as near transit centers, retail and employment centers and in commercial mixed use districts. • Promote the preservation and maintenance of existing multi-family housing stock. • Promote high-quality architectural design in the construction of new multi-family developments. • Be proactive in analyzing and guiding redevelopment opportunities for multi-family developments. Home Ownership: The City places a high priority on home ownership including affordable homeownership options. Explore traditional and non-traditional owner-occupied housing options such as; row houses, courtyard housing, high-rises, 3-story homes, Land Trust and Habitat homes, and multi-generational housing, etc. Affordable Housing: • Promote and facilitate a mix of housing types, prices and rents suitable for households of all income levels including affordable housing for low and moderate income households. • Affordable housing should be disbursed throughout the City and not concentrated in any one area of the City. • Support the preservation of naturally occurring affordable housing. • Promote the inclusion of affordable housing opportunities in new multi-family market rate developments. • Future affordability goals with the Metropolitan Council should be reflective of the City’s existing affordable housing stock as well as City’s future needs. Preservation, Safety and Sustainability: • Ensure all housing is safe and well maintained. • Preserve and enhance housing quality through code enforcement and the promotion of housing improvement programs related to home rehabilitation, design and housing safety. • Encourage the use of green building, energy efficient products, and sustainability in both single family and multi-family housing construction. April 17, 2014 MEMORANDUM TO: Michele Schnitker City of St. Louis Park FROM: Matt Mullins David Sajevic Maxfield Research Inc. RE: Community Comparisons Introduction Maxfield Research completed the Comprehensive Housing Needs Analysis for the City of St. Louis Park in June 2013. The study was designed to identify current and future housing needs in St. Louis Park and help decision makers develop a greater understanding of the city’s housing market. Subsequently, housing goals and priorities were among the key topics discussed at the Council Workshop in February 2014. One of the outcomes from the Council Workshop was the preparation of background information on other first‐ring Metro Area communities for comparison purposes. Table 1 provides a summary of housing‐related metrics that compares St. Louis Park to other surrounding and inner‐ring communities. The identified communities include: Bloomington, Edina, Golden Valley, Hopkins, Richfield, and Roseville. In most cases data is also presented for Hennepin County and the Seven‐County Metro Area. The detailed summary covers several components including: demographics, employment, housing characteristics, cost burdened households, and project based affordable/subsidized housing units. Key points are summarized for each major component in the table. If you have additional comments or questions, please feel free 612‐338‐0012 (fax) 612‐904‐7979 1221 Nicollet Avenue, Suite 218, Minneapolis, MN 55403 www.maxfieldresearch.com Special Study Session Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 2) Title: Review of City's Housing Goals Page 8 MAXFIELD RESEARCH INC. Geographic Area The geographic area of the peer communities is presented in square miles. • As depicted in the chart below, St. Louis Park’s geographic area (10.86 square miles) is larger than contiguous Hopkins (4.11 sq. miles) and similar to Golden Valley (10.55 sq. miles). Edina and Roseville both have larger land areas, while Bloomington’s land area is approximately 3.5 times larger. 45 40 38.42 Geographic Area ‐ Square Miles 35 30 25 20 15.97 15 10 5 10.55 4.11 7.01 13.84 10.86 0 Bloomington Edina Golden Valley Hopkins Richfield Roseville St. Louis Park Special Study Session Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 2) Title: Review of City's Housing Goals Page 9 MAXFIELD RESEARCH INC. Demographics This section of the community comparison examines population, households, household size, household income (average and median), household types, percent living alone, and household tenure. All data, except for household income (average and median), was derived from the 2010 U.S. Census. The 2013 household income (average and median) data was estimated by Maxfield Research Inc. based on income trends provided by ESRI (a national demographics service provider). 2010 Population • Excluding Bloomington, St. Louis Park’s population (45,250) is among the highest of the peer communities. St. Louis Park’s population is projected to grow by about 4,000 persons this decade (+8.6%). • The City of Hopkins has the smallest population in 2010 with a total of 17,591 people. 90,000 80,000 82,893 Population 70,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 47,941 20,371 17,591 35,228 33,660 45,250 10,000 ‐ Bloomington Edina Golden Valley Hopkins Richfield Roseville St. Louis Park Special Study Session Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 2) Title: Review of City's Housing Goals Page 10 MAXFIELD RESEARCH INC. Population Density • Population density is defined as the number of persons divided by the land area (square miles). St. Louis Park boasts over 4,100 persons per square mile, similar to Hopkins (4,280 persons per mile). However, Richfield has the highest population per square mile with over 5,000 residents per square mile. • St. Louis Park is denser than the communities of Bloomington (2,158), Edina (3,003), Golden Valley (1,931), and Roseville (2,432). St. Louis Park is significantly denser than Hennepin County (1,902) and the Metro Area (957). 6,000 5,000 Population Density ‐ Persons per Square Miles 5,025 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 2,158 3,002 1,931 4,280 2,432 4,167 1,902 957 0 Special Study Session Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 2) Title: Review of City's Housing Goals Page 11 MAXFIELD RESEARCH INC. Households (2010) • Compared to the peer communities, St. Louis Park had the second largest number of households in 2010 with a total of 21,743. Edina has the third largest number of households with a total of nearly 20,700 households. • The City of Bloomington has the largest household base in 2010 with a total of almost 36,000 and the City of Hopkins has the smallest number of households with a total of roughly 8,400. Households 40,000 35,000 35,905 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 20,672 8,816 8,366 14,818 14,623 21,743 5,000 ‐ Bloomington Edina Golden Valley Hopkins Richfield Roseville St. Louis Park Special Study Session Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 2) Title: Review of City's Housing Goals Page 12 MAXFIELD RESEARCH INC. Household Size (2010) • St. Louis Park had the lowest household size with an average of 2.08 persons per household. The second smallest household size was in Hopkins (2.10). The largest household size among the peer communities is found in Richfield (2.38). The smaller household sizes in St. Louis Park and Hopkins can be in part attributed to a high percentage of householders living alone. • In comparison, Hennepin County has an average household size of 2.42 and the Metro Area is 2.55 persons per household. 2.75 Household Size 2.55 2.50 2.31 2.32 2.31 2.38 2.30 2.42 2.25 2.10 2.08 2.00 Special Study Session Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 2) Title: Review of City's Housing Goals Page 13 MAXFIELD RESEARCH INC. $78,579 $58,363 $110,634 $82,375 $95,258 $72,035 $62,246 $41,080 $61,744 $49,230 $76,271 $57,750 $68,768 $52,378 $79,880 $57,326 $81,259 $61,175 Household Income (2013 Avg. and Median) • The average and median income in St. Louis Park in 2013 is $68,768 and $52,378 respectively. St. Louis Park’s incomes are higher than Hopkins and Richfield, but lower than Edina, Golden Valley, Bloomington, and Roseville. • Edina and Golden Valley have the highest median household incomes with $82,375 and $72,035, respectively. • In comparison to Hennepin County and the Metro Area, household income in St. Louis Park is slightly lower. Hennepin County has a median household income of $57,326 and the Metro Area has a median household income of $61,175. $120,000 $100,000 Household Income Household Income (Avg.) 2013 Household Income (Median) 2013 $80,000 $60,000 $40,000 $20,000 $0 Special Study Session Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 2) Title: Review of City's Housing Goals Page 14 MAXFIELD RESEARCH INC. Living Alone (2010) • St. Louis Park (40.1%) and Hopkins (43.4%) have the highest percentage of householders living alone compared the peer communities. The large supply of smaller housing units and one‐bedroom units plays a factor in the higher than average percentage of persons living alone. • About one‐third of Hennepin County householders live alone. Golden Valley has the lowest percentage of households living alone (30.4%). 50.0% Percent Living Alone 40.0% 30.0% 32.2% 33.1% 30.4% 43.4% 34.3% 35.3% 40.1% 32.7% 20.0% Special Study Session Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 2) Title: Review of City's Housing Goals Page 15 MAXFIELD RESEARCH INC. 68.9% 31.1% 74.8% 25.2% 77.8% 22.2% 39.3% 60.7% 64.9% 35.1% 67.2% 32.8% 60.7% 39.3% 64.3% 35.7% 70.0% 30.0% Household Tenure (2010) • Approximately 61% of St. Louis Park households owned their housing in 2010. Compared to the peer communities only Hopkins posted a lower percentage (39.3%). The homeownership rate in Hennepin County is about 64% while 70% of Metro Area householders are homeowners. • Bloomington (68.9%), Richfield (64.9%), and Roseville (67.2%) all have somewhat similar ratios of owner‐to‐renter households. • Contiguous Edina and Golden Valley had owner‐occupied households accounting for about 75% or more. 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Household Tenure Renters Owners Special Study Session Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 2) Title: Review of City's Housing Goals Page 16 MAXFIELD RESEARCH INC. Housing Characteristics This section of the memorandum analyzes median age of housing stock, median household income by tenure (owner and renter), median sales price, owner turnover, mobility over 1 year, rental vacancy rates, and building permits. Age of housing stock, median household income by tenure, owner turnover, and mobility over 1 year was derived from the 2011 American Community Survey. Median sales price data is derived from the Regional Multiple Listing Service of Minnesota (RMLS) and is 2013 year‐end data. Rental vacancy rate data is sources to Marquette Advisors and is also the year‐end 2013 data. Building Permit data was sourced through Met Council. Median Age of Housing Stock (2011) • Amongst all owner and renter‐occupied units, the median age of a housing unit in St. Louis Park is 1960. Compared to the peer communities, only Richfield has an older housing stock (1957). Neighboring Golden Valley (1965), Edina (1966), and Hopkins (1970) all have slightly newer housing units. • In comparison to Hennepin County and the Metro Area, St. Louis Park has an older housing stock due to its geographic location as an inner‐ring, central community. Hennepin County and Metro Area have median housing age of 1968 and 1974 respectively. 1975 1970 1969 Median Age of Housing Stock 1970 1968 1974 1965 1960 1966 1965 1957 1965 1960 1955 1950 Special Study Session Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 2) Title: Review of City's Housing Goals Page 17 MAXFIELD RESEARCH INC. $76,761 $36,007 $105,078 $51,453 $94,673 $39,939 $76,818 $39,014 $68,571 $32,157 $76,524 $39,024 $81,956 $44,572 $84,133 $33,234 Median HH Income by Tenure (2011 Owner and Renter) • St. Louis Park owner‐occupied householders had a median household income of nearly $82,000 compared to $44,500 among renter households. • Owner‐occupied household income in St. Louis Park is higher than Roseville, Richfield, Hopkins, and Bloomington. Only Edina and Golden Valley have higher incomes. • In comparison to Hennepin County, St. Louis Park has a slightly lower household income. Hennepin County has a median owner‐occupied household income in 2011 with $84,133. • St. Louis Park median renter incomes are higher than most peer cities as only Edina has a higher renter median income. St. Louis Park’s median income for renters is about +34% higher than Hennepin County’s. $120,000 $100,000 $80,000 Median HH Income by Tenure Median HH Income by Tenure (Owner) Median HH Income by Tenure (Renter) $60,000 $40,000 $20,000 $0 Special Study Session Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 2) Title: Review of City's Housing Goals Page 18 MAXFIELD RESEARCH INC. Median Sales Price (2013) • The median sales price in St. Louis Park was $219,000 in 2013. The median sales price is higher than peer communities Hopkins, Richfield, and Roseville but lower than Bloomington, Edina, and Golden Valley. • In comparison to Hennepin County and the Metro Area, St. Louis Park has a slightly higher median sales price. Hennepin County and Metro Area had median sales price of $209,900 and $201,200 respectively in 2013. $400,000 Median Sales Price (2013) $350,000 $350,000 $300,000 $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $193,100 $246,000 $180,500 $174,950 $197,535 $219,000 $209,900 $201,200 $100,000 Special Study Session Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 2) Title: Review of City's Housing Goals Page 19 MAXFIELD RESEARCH INC. Owner Turnover (2013 resales) • Owner turnover is defined as the number of owner‐occupied housing units that sold in 2013 divided by the total number of owner‐occupied housing units in the defined geography. Nearly 7% of St. Louis Park’s owner occupied housing units turned‐over last year, resulting in the highest percentage versus the comparable communities. Hopkins (6.5%) and Edina (6.4%) had similar turnover percentages • Compared to Hennepin County and the Metro Area, St. Louis Park posted higher turnover percentages this past year. Hennepin County and Metro Area have an owner turnover percentage of 6.3% and 5.9%. The local real estate market in St. Louis Park posted positive gains in 2013 as over 900 resales were recorded, an increase of +13% compared to 2012. 7.0% 6.5% 6.0% 5.5% 5.0% 4.5% 4.7% 6.4% 5.5% Owner Turnover (1 year) 6.5% 6.1% 4.5% 6.9% 6.3% 5.9% 4.0% Special Study Session Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 2) Title: Review of City's Housing Goals Page 20 MAXFIELD RESEARCH INC. Mobility over 1 year (2011 All HH’s) • Mobility is defined as the number of householders who moved outside the defined community in the past year (in this case 2011). About one‐fifth of St. Louis Park householders moved outside of St. Louis Park over the course of the year. Only Hopkins (28.7%) has a higher percentage of moves. This percentage is in‐part due to a higher ratio of rental housing stock compared to other communities. • In comparison to Hennepin County and the Metro Area, mobility is higher in St. Louis Park. Hennepin County and Metro Area have a mobility percentage of 17.8% and 15.3%, respectively. 35.0% Mobility over 1 year (All HHs) 30.0% 28.7% 25.0% 20.0% 15.0% 13.3% 13.6% 14.0% 16.7% 15.6% 20.6% 17.8% 15.3% 10.0% Special Study Session Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 2) Title: Review of City's Housing Goals Page 21 MAXFIELD RESEARCH INC. Rental Vacancy Rate (2013) • Across the Metro Area, vacancy rates are extremely low as all of the identified geographies have vacancy rates below 5% (equilibrium). St. Louis Park vacancies are 2.5%, indicating pent‐up demand for apartment units. Richfield (2.2%) and Golden Valley (2.1%) are the only communities with slightly lower vacancies. • The Metro Area vacancy was also 2.5% at year‐end 2013. As a result, rents are increasing across the Metro Area because of the tight supply. Special Study Session Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 2) Title: Review of City's Housing Goals Page 22 MAXFIELD RESEARCH INC. Building Permits (2000 to 2012) • Compared to the comparison communities, St. Louis Park issued the most building permits between 2000 and 2012 (2,930 permits). Building permits were driven by condominium construction in the first‐half of the decade and apartments over the last few years. • Bloomington posted the second highest number of building permits with just over 2,000. Hopkins posted the fewest with 424 permits. Total Building Permits (2000 to 2012) 3,500 3,000 2,930 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 2,022 1,424 669 424 693 924 0 Bloomington Edina Golden Valley Hopkins Richfield Roseville St. Louis Park Special Study Session Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 2) Title: Review of City's Housing Goals Page 23 MAXFIELD RESEARCH INC. Cost Burdened Households Families who pay more than 30% of their income for housing are considered cost burdened. This section of the memorandum examines cost burned households, owner‐occupied and renter‐occupied, and overall percentages of people below the poverty level. Cost Burdened Households (all owner households) • Approximately 30% of St. Louis Park owner households are cost burdened; about the same percentage as Hennepin County but higher than the Metro Area average. • Richfield and Hopkins have a higher percentage of cost burdened owner households than St. Louis Park. 35.0% 30.0% 27.6% 27.5% Cost Burden‐All Owner HH's 32.7% 32.2% 26.1% 30.3% 30.6% 28.7% 25.0% 25.1% 20.0% Special Study Session Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 2) Title: Review of City's Housing Goals Page 24 MAXFIELD RESEARCH INC. Cost Burdened Households (all renter households) • Compared to other peer communities, St. Louis Park has the lowest percentage of cost burdened renter‐occupied households (40.8%). Richfield has the highest percentage at about 54%. • St. Louis Park also has a lower percentage of cost burdened renter‐occupied households than Hennepin County (49.7%) and the Metro Area (48.7%). 60.0% 55.0% 50.0% 51.0% Cost Burden‐Renter HH's 53.9% 50.6% 49.7% 48.7% 45.0% 40.0% 43.0% 42.8% 43.7% 40.8% 35.0% 30.0% Special Study Session Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 2) Title: Review of City's Housing Goals Page 25 MAXFIELD RESEARCH INC. Overall Percent below Poverty Level • Roughly 9% of St. Louis Park’s households are below the poverty line. This percentage is lower than Hopkins and Richfield, but higher than other neighboring communities. Edina has the lowest percentage of households in poverty at 4%. • The percentage of households below the poverty line in St. Louis Park is lower than Hennepin County (12.3%) and the Metro Area (10.3%). 14.0% 12.0% 10.0% Overall Percent below poverty level 12.8% 11.9% 12.3% 10.3% 8.0% 8.5% 7.0% 8.4% 8.8% 6.0% 4.0% 4.0% 2.0% Special Study Session Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 2) Title: Review of City's Housing Goals Page 26 MAXFIELD RESEARCH INC. Project‐Based Affordable/Subsidized Units This segment of the memorandum analyzes project based affordable/subsidized units amongst the peer cities, Hennepin County, and the Metro Area. It should be noted the data does not include housing vouchers or naturally occurring affordable housing. Data is sourced to the Housing Link database. Total Number of Project‐Based Affordable/Subsidized Units • Compared to the peer communities, St. Louis Park has the most affordable/subsidized units with 961 units. Bloomington has a similar number (936) but also has a population nearly twice of St. Louis Park. Both communities have a similar number of affordable/subsidized units at 30% Ami and 50% AMI. • Approximately 11% of St. Louis Park’s rental housing stock is project based affordable/subsidized. Golden Valley has the highest ratio of affordable/subsidized units to the rental housing stock; however Golden Valley has substantially fewer rental units and only 22% of the households are rental. • About 57% of St. Louis Park’s project based affordable housing is affordable at 30% AMI. Approximately 31% is affordable at 50% AMI and 12% at 60% AMI. Special Study Session Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 2) Title: Review of City's Housing Goals Page 27 MAXFIELD RESEARCH INC. Special Study Session Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 2) Title: Review of City's Housing Goals Page 28 MAXFIELD RESEARCH INC. TABLE 1 DEMOGRAPHIC, HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS, & EMPLOYMENT SUMMARY SAINT LOUIS PARK COMPARISON 2010 (unless otherwise noted) Summary Bloomington Edina Golden Valley Hopkins Richfield Roseville St. Louis Park Hennepin Co. Metro Area (7‐County) Num Pct. Num Pct. Num Pct. Num Pct. Num Pct. Num Pct. Num Pct. Num Pct. Num Pct. Geographic Area (Squre Miles) 38.42 82,893 35,905 2.31 $78,579 $58,363 5,731 16.0% 11,013 30.7% 4,874 13.6% 11,545 32.2% 2,742 7.6% 16,363 19.7% 6,485 7.8% 11,312 13.6% 9,531 11.5% 12,762 15.4% 11,222 13.5% 7,502 9.1% 7,716 9.3% 24,737 68.9% 11,168 31.1% 2,158 89,195 3,563 $1,093 79,326 32,734 46,592 15.97 47,941 20,672 2.32 $110,634 $82,375 4,955 24.0% 6,153 29.8% 1,810 8.8% 6,851 33.1% 903 4.4% 11,589 24.2% 2,200 4.6% 4,288 8.9% 5,783 12.1% 7,556 15.8% 6,618 13.8% 4,146 8.6% 5,761 12.0% 15,455 74.8% 5,217 25.2% 3,002 48,653 2,799 $1,099 48,036 18,830 29,206 10.55 20,371 8,816 2.31 $95,258 $72,035 1,648 18.7% 2,784 31.6% 985 11.2% 2,682 30.4% 717 8.1% 4,055 19.9% 1,034 5.1% 2,421 11.9% 2,436 12.0% 3,387 16.6% 2,896 14.2% 1,801 8.8% 2,341 11.5% 6,857 77.8% 1,959 22.2% 1,931 35,446 1,187 $1,902 39,279 8,609 30,670 4.11 17,591 8,366 2.10 $62,246 $41,080 1,154 13.8% 1,474 17.6% 1,347 16.1% 3,628 43.4% 763 9.1% 3,718 21.1% 1,494 8.5% 3,766 21.4% 2,269 12.9% 2,328 13.2% 1,792 10.2% 895 5.1% 1,329 7.6% 3,289 39.3% 5,077 60.7% 4,280 14,208 699 $1,327 10,490 8,110 2,380 7.01 35,228 14,818 2.38 $61,744 $49,230 2,464 16.6% 3,641 24.6% 2,315 15.6% 5,081 34.3% 1,317 8.9% 7,516 21.3% 2,979 8.5% 6,536 18.6% 4,510 12.8% 4,779 13.6% 3,898 11.1% 2,109 6.0% 2,901 8.2% 9,618 64.9% 5,200 35.1% 5,025 15,938 722 $1,183 14,768 15,996 ‐1,228 13.84 33,660 14,623 2.30 $76,271 $57,750 2,358 16.1% 4,370 29.9% 1,678 11.5% 5,160 35.3% 1,057 7.2% 6,255 18.6% 3,642 10.8% 4,472 13.3% 3,545 10.5% 4,734 14.1% 4,227 12.6% 2,976 8.8% 3,809 11.3% 9,831 67.2% 4,792 32.8% 2,432 36,517 1,485 $855 31,681 14,035 17,646 10.86 45,250 21,743 2.08 $68,768 $52,378 3,084 14.2% 4,647 21.4% 2,728 12.5% 8,716 40.1% 2,568 11.8% 8,373 18.5% 3,634 8.0% 10,354 22.9% 6,150 13.6% 5,889 13.0% 4,974 11.0% 2,560 5.7% 3,316 7.3% 13,191 60.7% 8,552 39.3% 4,167 42,393 1,939 $940 37,716 22,147 15,569 606.00 1,152,425 475,913 2.42 $79,880 $57,326 89,084 18.7% 116,099 24.4% 67,702 14.2% 155,807 32.7% 47,221 9.9% 261,345 22.7% 113,551 9.9% 187,523 16.3% 154,304 13.4% 171,130 14.8% 133,758 11.6% 66,516 5.8% 64,298 5.6% 306,121 64.3% 169,792 35.7% 1,902 853,369 38,596 $1,164 424,103 151,355 272,748 2,976.26 2,849,567 1,117,749 2.55 $81,259 $61,175 244,687 21.9% 298,723 26.7% 164,086 14.7% 91,223 8.2% 319,030 28.5% 700,960 24.6% 263,462 9.2% 420,311 14.7% 391,324 13.7% 440,753 15.5% 326,007 11.4% 163,425 5.7% 143,325 5.0% 782,475 70.0% 335,274 30.0% 957 n/a n/a n/a 884,216 738,054 146,162 Demographics Population Households Household Size Household Income (Avg.) 2013 Household Income (Median) 2013 Household Type Married with Children Married without Children Other Living Alone Roommates Age Distribution Under 18 18 to 24 25 to 34 35 to 44 45 to 54 55 to 64 65 to 74 75+ Tenure Owners Renters Population Density (per sq. mile) Employment Employment Establishments Avg. Weekly Wage1 Inflow/Outflow Inflow2 Outflow2 Netflow2 CONTINUED Special Study Session Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 2) Title: Review of City's Housing Goals Page 29 MAXFIELD RESEARCH INC. TABLE 1 (Con't) DEMOGRAPHIC, HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS, & EMPLOYMENT SUMMARY SAINT LOUIS PARK COMPARISON 2010 (unless otherwise noted) Summary Bloomington Edina Golden Valley Hopkins Richfield Roseville St. Louis Park Hennepin Co. Metro Area (7‐County) Num Pct. Num Pct. Num Pct. Num Pct. Num Pct. Num Pct. Num Pct. Num Pct. Num Pct. 35,736 1969 1966 1974 857 2.4% 10,398 29.1% 15,036 42.1% 7,958 22.3% 1,487 4.2% $76,761 $36,007 $855 $234,700 $193,100 1165 4.7% 13.3% 2.5% 929 45.9% 405 20.0% 688 34.0% 20,586 1966 1962 1974 1,858 9.0% 6,175 30.0% 7,850 38.1% 3,605 17.5% 1,098 5.3% $105,078 $51,453 $1,042 $391,700 $350,000 993 6.4% 13.6% 3.1% 452 31.7% 672 47.2% 300 21.1% 8,695 1965 1962 1975 407 4.7% 2,910 33.5% 3,704 42.6% 997 11.5% 677 7.8% $94,673 $39,939 $851 $277,900 $246,000 380 5.5% 14.0% 2.1% 615 91.9% 40 6.0% 14 2.1% 7,989 1970 1956 1974 869 10.9% 2,085 26.1% 2,932 36.7% 1,534 19.2% 569 7.1% $76,818 $39,014 $846 $225,200 $180,500 215 6.5% 28.7% 4.1% 334 78.8% 33 7.8% 57 13.4% 14,816 1957 1954 1969 885 6.0% 8,159 55.1% 3,499 23.6% 1,545 10.4% 728 4.9% $68,571 $32,157 $718 $212,800 $174,950 583 6.1% 16.7% 2.2% 576 83.1% 12 1.7% 105 15.2% 14,770 1965 1961 1972 572 3.9% 4,991 33.8% 6,368 43.1% 2,225 15.1% 614 4.2% $76,524 $39,024 $790 $232,200 $197,535 440 4.5% 15.6% 2.8% 601 65.0% 109 11.8% 214 23.2% 21,357 1960 1954 1974 1,858 8.7% 9,041 42.3% 5,528 25.9% 3,207 15.0% 1,723 8.1% $81,956 $44,572 $862 $240,400 $219,000 909 6.9% 20.6% 2.5% 1422 48.5% 877 29.9% 631 21.5% 475,737 1968 1965 1971 97,266 20.4% 96,177 20.2% 130,718 27.5% 109,383 23.0% 42,193 8.9% 84,133 33,234 $810 $244,100 $209,900 19161 6.3% 17.8% n/a 33841 62.1% 12401 22.8% 8247 15.1% 1,117,438 1974 n/a n/a 174,017 15.6% 175,296 15.7% 298,563 26.7% 327,462 29.3% 142,100 12.7% n/a n/a $771 $238,727 $201,200 46151 5.9% 15.3% 2.5% 116769 68.3% 36589 21.4% 17655 10.3% Housing Characteristics (2011) Total Housing Units Median Age of Housing Stock Owner Median Renter Median Year Built Built Prior to 1940 1940 to 1959 1960 to 1979 1980 to 1999 2000+ Median HH Income by Tenure (Owner) Median HH Income by Tenure (Renter) Contract Rent Median Home Value Median Sales Price (2013)3 Closed Sales (2013)3 Owner Turnover (1 year)3 Mobility over 1 year (All HHs) Rental Vacancy Rate (2013)4 Building Permits5 2000 to 2005 2006 to 2010 2011 to 2012 Total 2000 to 2012 2,022 100.0% 6,889 27.6% 3,949 55.7% 5,256 51.0% 4,196 86.4% 8.5% 1,832 11.2% 4,340 8.5% 776 5.3% 587 62.7% 308 32.9% 41 4.4% 0 0.0% 1,424 100.0% 4,192 27.5% 2,196 59.3% 2,199 43.0% 1,633 82.4% 4.0% 402 3.5% 1,125 4.3% 362 3.7% 404 83.8% 8 1.7% 70 14.5% 0 0.0% 669 100.0% 1,750 26.1% 824 62.4% 942 50.6% 661 77.3% 7.0% 404 10.9% 767 6.3% 220 5.8% 133 24.4% 413 75.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 424 100.0% 1,026 32.7% 636 60.6% 2,050 42.8% 1,561 80.4% 11.9% 828 20.3% 1,079 9.4% 138 8.1% 378 70.9% 155 29.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 693 100.0% 3,079 32.2% 1,917 59.7% 2,725 53.9% 2,289 80.3% 12.8% 1,582 21.9% 2,449 10.8% 445 8.8% 180 29.5% 78 12.8% 308 50.4% 45 7.4% 924 100.0% 2,439 25.1% 1,562 49.3% 2,087 43.7% 1,736 81.3% 8.4% 676 11.1% 1,695 8.7% 323 5.0% 328 43.8% 177 23.6% 244 32.6% 0 0.0% 2,930 100.0% 3,952 30.3% 2,089 65.2% 3,301 40.8% 2,725 82.6% 8.8% 1,107 12.9% 2,418 7.8% 374 7.5% 544 56.6% 300 31.2% 117 12.2% 0 0.0% 54,489 100.0% 94,000 30.6% 50,180 65.9% 80,115 49.7% 67,599 81.5% 12.3% 42,814 16.6% 85,528 11.5% 9,916 8.1% n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 171,013 100.0% 224,143 28.7% 121,859 61.9% 163,723 48.7% 137,580 77.4% 10.3% 96,158 13.9% 170,853 9.5% 21,335 7.4% n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Cost Burdened Households6 Cost Burdened HH (Owner) All Owner HHs Owner HHs earning <$50k Cost Burdened HH (Renter) All Renter HHs Renters HHs earning <$35k Overall Percent below poverty level7 Under 18 18 to 64 65 and over Project Based Affordable/Subsidized Hsg. Units8 30% AMI 50% AMI 60% AMI 80% AMI Total Aff. Unit Pct. of Rental Housing Stock 936 100.0% 8.4% 482 100.0% 9.2% 546 100.0% 27.9% 533 100.0% 10.5% 611 100.0% 11.8% 749 100.0% 15.6% 961 100.0% 11.2% Sources: 1 Per DEED 2 Per On the Map LEHD 3 Per Regional MLS of Minnesota. Owner turnover is calcuated based on the number of sales in 2013 divided by the owner housing stock. 4 Per Marquette Advisors 5 Per Met Council 6 Cost Burden is defined as a household spending greater than 30% of their income for housing. 7 Poverty, according to U.S. Census, uses a set of money income thresholds that vary by family size and composition to determine who is in poverty. If the total income for a family or unrelated individual falls below the relevant poverty threshold, then the family (and every individual in it) or unrelated individual is considered in poverty. 8 Per Housing Link Source: U.S. Census Bureau; ESRI; Met Council, LEHD, Marquette Advisors, RMLS, Maxfield Research, Inc. Special Study Session Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 2) Title: Review of City's Housing Goals Page 30 Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 21, 2014 Presentation: 2a EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Presentation Accepting Monetary Donation from the Rotary Club of St. Louis Park for the Summer Concert Series ($1,000) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Nate Rosa, Recreation Supervisor, will be present to accept a donation in the amount of $1,000. Jim Rhodes and Paul Bierhaus, members of the Rotary Club of St. Louis Park, will be in attendance to present the check for the summer concert series. The donation will be officially accepted by the City Council as a consent item following the presentation. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish to accept the gift with restrictions on its use? SUMMARY: State statute requires City Council’s acceptance of donations. This requirement is necessary in order to make sure the City Council has knowledge of any restrictions placed on the use of each donation prior to it being expended. The Rotary Club of St. Louis Park is graciously donating an amount of $1,000. The donation is given with the restriction that it be used toward the Recreation Division’s Summer Concert Series. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The Rotary Club of St. Louis Park accepted donations at the Bundled Up Event held on January 25, 2014. The donations received are provided to support the Recreation Division’s Summer Concert Series. The Concert Series is budgeted in the Organized Recreation budget. VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged community. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: None Prepared by: Stacy M. Voelker, Administrative Secretary Reviewed by: Cindy Walsh, Director of Operations & Recreation Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 21, 2014 Consent Agenda Item: 4a EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Accept Monetary Donation from Rotary Club of St. Louis Park for the Summer Concert Series ($1,000) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution approving acceptance of a monetary donation from the Rotary Club of St. Louis Park in the amount of $1,000 for the Recreation Division’s Summer Concert Series. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish to accept the gift with restrictions on its use? SUMMARY: State statute requires City Council’s acceptance of donations. This requirement is necessary in order to make sure the City Council has knowledge of any restrictions placed on the use of each donation prior to it being expended. The Rotary Club of St. Louis Park is graciously donating an amount of $1,000. The donation is given with the restriction that it be used toward the Summer Concert Series. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: This donation will be used to support the Recreation Division’s Summer Concert Series. The Series is budgeted in the Organized Recreation budget. VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged community. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution Prepared by: Stacy M. Voelker, Administrative Secretary Reviewed by: Cindy Walsh, Director of Operations & Recreation Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 4a) Page 2 Title: Accept Monetary Donation from Rotary Club of St. Louis Park for the Summer Concert Series ($1,000) RESOLUTION NO. 14-____ RESOLUTION APPROVING ACCEPTANCE OF DONATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,000 TO BE USED FOR THE SUMMER CONCERT SERIES WHEREAS, The City of St. Louis Park is required by State statute to authorize acceptance of any donations; and WHEREAS, the City Council must also ratify any restrictions placed on the donation by the donor; and WHEREAS, the Rotary Club of St. Louis Park donated $1,000 to assist in the funding of the Recreation Division’s Summer Concert Series; and NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park that the gift is hereby accepted with thanks to the Rotary Club of St. Louis Park with the understanding that it must be used to assist in funding the Recreation Division’s Summer Concert Series. Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council April 21, 2014 City Manager Mayor Attest: City Clerk Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 21, 2014 Consent Agenda Item: 4b EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: DLC Apartments PUD Minor Amendment RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution Amending and Restating the Final Planned Unit Development for the West End Redevelopment Project. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council support the minor amendments to the DLC Apartments building plan? SUMMARY: The proposed request is being processed as a Minor Amendment to the Planned Unit Development (PUD) because the changes are not anticipated to have any off-site impacts and the proposed changes meet all City Code requirements. DLC Apartments is located at 5245 Wayzata Boulevard and is part of the overall PUD for The West End Redevelopment. City Council approved a PUD Major Amendment for removal of the former Chili’s restaurant and construction of the DLC Apartments 158-unit building on October 7, 2013. The developer proposes a change in the mix of unit types in the building, but maintains the overall number of apartments in the building at 158 units. In general, the proposed plan decreases the number of studio apartments, increases the number of two-bedroom apartments, maintains the number of 3-bedroom apartments, increases the total bedroom count in the building, and increases the number of parking stalls provided in the garage. A letter from the architect provides a clear description of the plan changes, and it is attached for your review. In addition to the changes requested by the developer, staff requests that City Council correct an error that staff identified in the resolution of approval. The side yard setbacks were accurately presented in the plans and staff report, but the east and west dimensions were mistakenly reversed in the resolution, so the dimension for the east setback should have been labeled west and the dimension for the west side should have been labeled east. This correction is included in the proposed resolution. The plan revisions proposed in this PUD Minor Amendment provide modest improvements to the plan based on City Council input during the original plan review. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a well-maintained and diverse housing stock. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution Letter from Architect Revised Plans Prepared by: Sean Walther, Senior Planner Reviewed by: Michele Schnitker, Housing Supervisor Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 4b) Page 2 Title: DLC Apartments PUD Minor Amendment DISCUSSION BACKGROUND: Below are a list and more detailed description of the changes to the unit mix, bedroom counts and parking requested by the applicant compared to the previously approved plan. • Unit-mix changes: The proposed building plan has six fewer studio units, five additional two-bedroom apartments, and one additional 1-bedroom unit. The number of 3-bedroom units remains the same. Essentially, several studio apartments were changed to 1-bedroom apartments and several 1-bedroom+den apartments were changed to 2-bedroom apartments. Unit Type # of Units Approved # of Units Proposed # of Units Change Studio 23 17 -6 1-Bedroom 57 64 +7 1-Bedroom + Den 16 10 -6 2-Bedroom 56 61 +5 3-Bedroom 6 6 0 TOTAL 158 158 0 • Increase in bedrooms: The total bedroom count in the building increased by five bedrooms from 226 to 231 bedrooms. The building still has 158 apartments overall. • Additional on-site parking: The number of parking stalls provided in the parking garage under the building increased by five parking stalls from 238 to 243 stalls. These extra stalls allowed the developer to increase the number of bedrooms in the unit-mix and still meet the parking requirements. The increase in parking was achieved during design development of the building and by utilizing more compact parking stalls. • More compact parking stalls: The approved plan included 25 compact parking stalls. The proposed plan increases the total number to 45 compact parking stalls. This is within the maximum (20% percent) allowed by City Code. Conclusion The plan revisions proposed in this PUD Minor Amendment meet all City Code requirements. The revisions provide modest improvements to the plan, based on the City Council encouragement to provide more 2-bedroom and 3-bedroom apartments and fewer studio and 1- bedroom apartments. No off-site impacts are anticipated from these changes. NEXT STEPS: If approved, the developer will submit building permit plans reflecting the proposed building changes. Demolition of the Chili’s building is already complete and soil correction work is underway. The City is prepared to issue a building permit that would allow construction to begin on the footing and foundation of the building, which are not affected by the PUD Minor Amendment. City Council Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 4b) Page 3 Title: DLC Apartments PUD Minor Amendment RESOLUTION NO. 14-___ Amends and Restates Resolution Nos. 08-057, 08-128, 09-040, 09-064, 10-093, 11-016, 13-123 and 13-151 RESOLUTION AMENDING AND RESTATING RESOLUTION NOS. 08-057, 08-128, 09-040, 09-064, 10-093, 11-016, 13-123 AND 13-151 RELATING TO A FINAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR THE WEST END REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST QUADRANT OF INTERSTATE 394 AND HIGHWAY 100 The West End Redevelopment Project WHEREAS, the City has received an application for a Minor Amendment to a Final Planned Unit Development (Final PUD) for The West End Redevelopment Project located at the southwest quadrant of Interstate 394 and Highway 100 and legally described as THE SHOPS AT WEST END. WHEREAS, the City Council considered the effect of the proposed amendment on the health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan; and compliance with the intent of the Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a Final PUD was approved regarding the subject property pursuant to Resolution No. 08-057 of the St. Louis Park City Council dated April 28, 2008 which contained conditions applicable to said property; and WHEREAS, a Minor Amendment to the Final PUD was approved regarding the subject property pursuant to Resolution No. 08-128 of the St. Louis Park City Council dated October 6, 2008 which contained conditions applicable to said property; and WHEREAS, a Minor Amendment to the Final PUD was approved regarding the subject property pursuant to Resolution No. 09-040 of the St. Louis Park City Council dated March 2, 2009 which contained conditions applicable to said property; and WHEREAS, a Minor Amendment to the Final PUD was approved regarding the subject property pursuant to Resolution No. 09-064 of the St. Louis Park City Council dated May 4, 2009 which contained conditions applicable to said property; and WHEREAS, a Major Amendment to the Final PUD was approved regarding the subject property pursuant to Resolution No. 10-093 of the St. Louis Park City Council dated September 7, 2010 which contained conditions applicable to said property; and WHEREAS, a Minor Amendment to the Final PUD was approved regarding the subject property pursuant to Resolution 11-016 of the St. Louis Park City Council dated January 18, 2011 which contained conditions applicable to said property; and WHEREAS, a Major Amendment to the Final PUD was approved regarding the subject property pursuant to Resolution 13-123 of the St. Louis Park City Council dated August 19, 2013, which contained conditions applicable to said property; and City Council Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 4b) Page 4 Title: DLC Apartments PUD Minor Amendment WHEREAS, a Major Amendment to the Final PUD was approved regarding the subject property pursuant to Resolution 13-151 of the St. Louis Park City Council dated October 7, 2013, which contained conditions applicable to said property; and WHEREAS, due to changed circumstances, amendments to those conditions are now necessary, requiring the amendment of that Final PUD; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of this resolution to continue and restate the conditions of the Final PUD granted by Resolution Nos. 08-057, 08-128, 09-040, 09-064, 10-093, 11-016, 13-123 and 13-151, to add the amendments now required, and to consolidate all conditions applicable to the subject property in this resolution; and WHEREAS, the contents of Planning Case Files 14-11-PUD are hereby entered into and made part of the public hearing and the record of decision for this case. CONCLUSION NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Resolution Nos. 08-057, 08-128, 09- 040, 09-064, 10-093, 11-016, 13-123, and 13-151 are hereby restated and amended by this resolution which continues and amends a Final Planned Unit Development to the subject property at the location described above based on the following conditions: 1. The uses on the subject property are limited to retail, service, restaurants, hotel, theater, and office. The following uses are not allowed: in-vehicle sales and service (drive- through); motor fuel stations; motor vehicle sales, service and repair; car washes; currency exchanges; check cashing; pay loan agencies; pawnshops; sexually-oriented businesses, tattoo shops; gun shops (not excluding a sporting goods store that sells, as part of its sporting goods inventory, guns and ammunition). 2. The final site plan and façade design of the large retail building on Lot 4, Block 1, THE SHOPS AT WEST END (proposed grocery store) shall require a PUD Minor Amendment with review by the Planning Commission. 3. The hotel site plans for Lot 3, Block 1, THE SHOPS AT WEST END shall require a PUD Major Amendment if any variances are requested. If the plan does not require a variance, the application may be processed as a PUD Minor Amendment and include review and recommendation of the Planning Commission. 4. The total gross floor area of restaurants shall be limited to 90,820 square feet on the combination of Lot 4, Block 1 and Lot 2, Block 2, THE SHOPS AT WEST END, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 5. The total number of seats in the movie theater shall be limited to 2,700 seats. 6. Tenants in Building 32 shall be limited to Mercantile (Group M) uses as defined in the 2007 Minnesota State Building Code, such as retail or wholesale stores, sales rooms, department stores, drug stores, markets, etc. City Council Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 4b) Page 5 Title: DLC Apartments PUD Minor Amendment 7. The portion of the five-level retail parking structure (Building 35) that is within 20 feet of the Gamble Drive right-of-way shall have a minimum of 60% Class I exterior materials. The Developer shall amend the Official Exhibits to comply with this requirement. 8. The Community Development Director and Zoning Administrator or their designee(s) may approve individual tenant/building façade designs administratively or refer proposals to the Planning Commission and City Council for consideration, as City staff deems necessary. 9. The sign plan is subject to Community Development Director and Zoning Administrator review and approval. Sign permits are required. 10. Access to the truck courts on the west retail block from Park Place Boulevard shall be limited to between 8 p.m. and 10 a.m. 11. The access will be controlled from Park Place Boulevard to the truck courts on the west retail block using a mechanical bollard system and directional signs in the Park Place Boulevard right-of-way. The Developer shall enter into a Planning Development Contract with the City of St. Louis Park that addresses this private use of public land. 12. The Developer shall maintain horizontal separation from landscaping (i.e. boulevard trees) of at least three feet from shallow underground utilities (i.e. fiber optic cable, private utilities, etc.), and eight feet horizontal separation from deeper underground utilities (i.e. water, sanitary sewer, etc.). 13. Tree plantings and street furnishings shall be located in a manner that maintains at least six feet wide clearance space in all boulevard/sidewalk areas for snow removal. 14. The Developer shall amend the Official Exhibits (The Shops at West End Design Guidelines) to incorporate the following: a. At pedestrian level, facades on Buildings 12, 22, 23, 24, 31, 32 and 33 shall be primarily transparent: 1. At least 60% of facades between 3 feet and 7 feet above the first floor elevation shall consist of pedestrian entrances, display windows or windows affording views into retail, offices, gallery or lobby space. The West End Tenant Design Guidelines shall illustrate the portions of the above referenced buildings subject to this requirement. 2. Visibility into the space shall be maintained for a minimum of three feet, but display of merchandise in this space is allowed. Display windows may be used to meet the transparency requirement. b. At pedestrian level (between 3 feet and 7 feet above the first floor elevation), building facades facing public streets, West End Boulevard, or the pedestrian arcade shall have no more than 10% of the total window area be glass block, mirrored, spandrel, frosted or other opaque glass. c. No more than 10% of the total window area of any building façade shall have signs applied to the inside or outside surface of the window. The remaining 90% City Council Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 4b) Page 6 Title: DLC Apartments PUD Minor Amendment of window and door area shall be clear or slightly tinted glass that allows views into and out of the building. d. Tenants in Buildings 12, 22, 24, 31, and 33 that are located adjacent to public and/or private street intersections shall locate entrances at or near the adjacent building corner. e. Awnings and canopies shall be made of heavy canvas, fabric, metal and/or glass. Plastic and vinyl awnings are prohibited. Backlit awnings and canopies are prohibited. 15. A business may use the sidewalk within five feet of its building wall for the following purposes, provided the business maintains a clear walkway that is at least eight feet wide along Park Place Boulevard and at least six feet wide along other streets, and provided the uses do not occur in the public right-of-way unless the City approves an encroachment agreement in accordance with the City’s Temporary Private Use of Public Land Policy: a. Display of merchandise, not to exceed 100 square feet per business; b. Benches, planters, ornaments, art; c. Signs permitted in the zoning ordinance; and d. Outdoor dining. Outdoor dining areas may extend farther than five-feet from the building wall, provided tables and chairs or other structures maintain the required horizontal clearance for a walkway between the dining area and other obstructions, such as trees, poles, and curbs. 16. The Developer shall provide easements and $285,000 for public art to help satisfy the alternative landscaping requirements. The City and the Developer will develop a public process to select the artists, artworks and locations. 17. The Developer shall amend Official Exhibits (utility plans) to provide separate domestic and fire water service lines to the buildings. 18. The developer shall work with the Police Department on the design and construction of the police substation area in Building 31. In particular, the plan shall provide windows and doorway on the northeast building elevation along the alley. 19. The developer shall redesign the public restroom entrances in the Building 31 atrium to have open entrances (no exterior doors to the atrium), similar to typical stadium/movie theater restroom entrances, as requested by the Police Department. 20. At City of St. Louis Park’s sole discretion, and upon conferring with the property owner, the property owner shall change the designation of West End Boulevard on-street parking stalls from short-term customer parking to “pick-up/drop-off only” (or similar restriction). 21. The applicant shall be responsible to obtain all permits from the City and other agencies. City Council Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 4b) Page 7 Title: DLC Apartments PUD Minor Amendment 22. The property owner(s) shall be responsible for obtaining a City license for all parking structures. 23. Tenants shall be responsible for obtaining all City licenses (i.e. grocery store, hotel, etc.). 24. The property owner shall prepare and effectuate traffic management plans that reduce traffic congestion. The property owner submitted a plan for review and approval of the by the St. Louis Park and Golden Valley I-394 Joint Task Force. The property owner shall implement The Traffic Management Plan (TMP) approved by the Travel Demand Management Joint Task Force prior to City issuance of a certificate of occupancy. 25. The City and Developer shall set up a monitoring program to determine actual sanitary sewer flows. Following each phase of the development, sewer flows will be analyzed to determine if sewer flows exceed Metropolitan Council limits described in the Metropolitan Council’s letter to the City of St. Louis Park dated December 14, 2006. If sanitary sewer flows exceed said limits, the Developer shall submit a final design of a privately owned, privately maintained, temporary sanitary sewer peak flow detention facilities for Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) and City of St. Louis Park approval. The Developer shall construct the said approved system and put it into operation in the timeframe designated by MCES and City of St. Louis Park, and prior to City issuance of building permits for additional phases. 26. The Developer shall abide by the City’s water use restrictions and follow State of Minnesota requirements for low-flow structures. After each phase of the redevelopment, water usage shall be monitored. If monitoring shows use exceeds 90% of peak capacity, the Developer shall cooperate with the City to identify citywide and project-specific measures to increase water treatment capacity and reduce consumption prior to City issuance of building permits. 27. The north office tower and operations center at 1551 Utica Avenue (Lot 1, Block 2, THE SHOPS AT WEST END) shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with the Official Exhibits from Zoning Application 86-14-SP and 07-61-PUD. If there is any conflict between the Official Exhibits, 07-61-PUD shall supersede. The following 86-14- SP Official Exhibits are incorporated by reference herein: Exhibit A – Site Plan and Lighting Plan; Exhibit B – Grading Plan; Exhibit C – Utilities Plan; Exhibit D – Landscape Plan; Exhibit E – Building Elevations; Exhibit F – Basement Floor Level Plan; Exhibit G – Ground Floor Plan; Exhibit H – Second Floor Plan; and Exhibit I – Typical Floor Plan, as modified by City Development on March 13, 1986. (The floor plans are included to show general use and configurations only.) 28. The following conditions shall apply to the south office tower at 1600 Utica Avenue (Lot 1, Block 2, THE SHOPS AT WEST END): a. The site shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with the Official Exhibits from Zoning Application 98-42-PUD and 07-61-PUD. If there is any conflict between the Official Exhibits, 07-61-PUD shall supersede. The following 98-42-PUD Official Exhibits are incorporated by reference herein: Exhibit A – Site Plan, Exhibit B – Landscape Plan, Exhibit C – Existing Survey, Exhibit D – Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan, Exhibit E – Utility Plan, Exhibit F – East Elevations, Exhibit G – North City Council Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 4b) Page 8 Title: DLC Apartments PUD Minor Amendment Elevation, Exhibit H – South Elevation, Exhibit I – West Elevations, Exhibit J – West Elevation - Parking Ramp, and Exhibit K – Parking Ramp elevation (south). b. Parking ramp layouts and site plan shall provide designation of at least 20 bicycle racks and at least 20 carpool spaces in convenient locations. c. A covenant shall be recorded on the property which specifies that a minimum of 4,000 square feet of the atrium shall remain in perpetuity as indoor open space and available for general “public” use. Said interior atrium space shall be designed in an aesthetically pleasing and usable way, with landscaping, benches, and the like. A detailed atrium plan shall be submitted and approved by the Community Development Director and the Zoning Administrator. d. The following modifications to ordinance requirements are re-authorized: 1. The floor area ratio for the PUD can be 1.57. 2. The setbacks on Gamble Drive for the parking ramp can be 17 feet. 3. Reduced office building setback along Gamble Drive of 96 feet. 29. The Olive Garden restaurant site at 5235 Wayzata Boulevard (Lot 2, Block 1, THE SHOPS AT WEST END) shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with the Official Exhibits from Zoning Applications 93-9-CUP, 93-34-CUP and 07-61-PUD. If there is any conflict between the Official Exhibits, 07-61-PUD shall supersede. The following 93-9-CUP and 93-34-CUP Official Exhibits are incorporated by reference herein: Exhibit A-1 – Site Plan, Exhibit B – Utility Plan, Exhibit C-1 – Landscape Plan, and Exhibit D – Exterior Elevations. 30. Prior to issuance of building permits, the following conditions shall be met: a. A Planning Development Contract shall be executed between the Developer and City that addresses, at a minimum: 1. Conditions of PUD approval as applicable or appropriate; 2. Public use of gathering spaces in the development; 3. Private use of public land 4. Maintenance agreement and/or special service district; 5. Surety in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit for Redeveloper Public Improvements and landscaping; and 6. Administrative approval of modifications to the PUD plans. The Mayor and City Manager are authorized to execute said Planning Development Contract. b. The Developer shall provide a surety to the City of St. Louis Park in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit for 1.10 times the estimated Redeveloper Public Improvements costs (as defined in the Redevelopment Agreement), and 1.25 times the estimated landscaping costs. c. The property owner shall pay the applicable Traffic Management Administrative Fee. City Council Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 4b) Page 9 Title: DLC Apartments PUD Minor Amendment 1. The portion of the shopping center subject to this fee is on Lot 2, Block 2, THE SHOPS AT WEST END. The total fee of $34,633 shall be paid to the City of St. Louis Park prior to City issuance of building permits. 2. Subsequent phases of the PUD (future hotel and office towers) shall pay fifty percent of the fee upon submission of a Final PUD Amendment application, and the remaining fifty percent of the fee upon submission of a building permit application, for each respective development phase. 31. The Planned Unit Development shall be amended on October 6, 2008 to incorporate all of the preceding conditions and add the following conditions relating to Lot 4, Block 1, THE SHOPS AT WEST END, Hennepin County, Minnesota: a. The site shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with the Official Exhibits from Zoning Application 08-32-PUD, including Exhibits C4B-Site Layout Plan North, C8A-Utility Plan, C10B-Landscape Street Plan, A11101- Building 11 Overall Plan, A11111-Building 11 Level 1 Area 1, A111112- Building 11 Level 1 Area 2, A11401-Building 11 Exterior Elevations, such documents incorporated by reference herein. b. Overnight cart storage shall be inside the building. c. The Developer shall continue to work with City staff through a public process to select public art and the complete plaza design. d. The Developer shall submit a site plan and programming plan for the plaza area to the City for review and approval by the Zoning Administrator. e. The building proposal includes graphic art panels in order to enhance the appearance of the building and pedestrian environment. The Developer shall submit plans for the graphics on the backlit translucent wall-mounted panels for review and approval by the Zoning Administrator. The panels and/or graphics shall be changed from time to time and at least biennially. The panel may include any mosaic, mural, painting or graphic art or combination thereof which is professionally applied to the panel that does not contain any brand name, product name, letters of the alphabet spelling or abbreviating the name of any product, company, profession or business, or any logo, trademark, trade name, or other commercial message (defined as supergraphics in the City Sign Code and exempt from the Sign Code provisions). The Developer shall allow use of the panels for public art. Proposed public art shall be subject to review and approval by the Developer and building tenant(s). f. Assent Form and Official Exhibits must be signed by the applicant (or applicant and owner if applicant is different from owner) prior to issuance of a building permit. g. The sign plan is subject to Community Development Director and Zoning Administrator review and approval. Sign permits are required. h. Approval of Building Permits, which may impose additional requirements. City Council Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 4b) Page 10 Title: DLC Apartments PUD Minor Amendment i. A Planning Development Contract between the Developer and City shall be amended to address, at a minimum: 1. Amended conditions of PUD approval as applicable or appropriate; 2. Public use of the plaza gathering space; 3. Temporary uses of the plaza; and 4. Administrative approval of modifications to the PUD plans. 32. The Planned Unit Development shall be amended on May 4, 2009 to incorporate all of the preceding conditions and add the following conditions relating to Lot 4, Block 1 and Lot 2, Block 2, THE SHOPS AT WEST END, Hennepin County, Minnesota: a. The site shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with the Official Exhibits from Zoning Application 09-07-VAR and 09-08-PUD relating to the Shops at West End Sign Plan, such documents incorporated by reference herein. 33. The Planned Unit Development shall be amended on September 7, 2010 to incorporate all of the preceding conditions and add the following conditions relating to Lot 3, Block 1, THE SHOPS AT WEST END, Hennepin County, Minnesota: a. The PUD major amendment is approved for the development of a six-story, 120- unit apartment building with structured parking to be developed at 5310 16th Street W, with five off-site parking stalls and 3,136 square feet of the designed outdoor recreation area provided off-site. b. The following PUD modifications, in addition to modifications previously authorized for the overall Shops at West End PUD: 1. Floor area ratio of 3.24. 2. Housing density of 112.6 units per acre. c. The site shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with the Official Exhibits from Zoning Applications 10-23-PUD and 10-25-VAR relating to a shadow variance, including Exhibits A100 Site Plan (revised 01/10/2011), AB101 Lower Level Garage Plan (revised 01/10/2011), A101 First Floor Plan (revised 01/10/2011), A102 Second Floor Plan (revised 01/10/2011), A103 Floors 3-6 Typical Floor Plan (revised 01/10/2011), A400 Exterior Elevations (revised 01/10/2011), A401 Exterior Elevations (revised 01/10/2011), L100 Landscape Plan (revised 01/10/2011), such documents incorporated by reference herein. d. The five (5) proposed off-site parking stalls shall be protected by an irrevocable covenant in a form approved by the City Attorney. A certified copy of the recorded document shall be provided to the Zoning Administrator within 60 days after approval. e. Prior to starting any site work, the following conditions shall be met: 1. The owner/applicant shall sign an Assent Form and the Official Exhibits. 2. All necessary permits must be obtained. 3. A preconstruction meeting shall be held with the appropriate development, construction and City representatives. f. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the following conditions shall be met: City Council Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 4b) Page 11 Title: DLC Apartments PUD Minor Amendment 1. Plans shall be reviewed by the City Engineer and Zoning Administrator to ensure that all proposed utilities, public access points and construction documents conform to the requirements of the City Code of Ordinances and City policies. 2. The applicant shall pay park dedication and trail dedication fees. 3. To ensure construction of the landscaping and the cleaning of public streets during construction, a financial guarantee shall be provided in the amount of 125% of the cost of the landscaping materials. The performance guarantee shall be in the form of cash escrow or letter of credit. The financial guarantee will be refunded upon project completion; however, a 25% will be retained for one year after installation to ensure the plants have survived the warranty period. 4. The planned installation of any mechanical equipment shall include means to ensure it is fully screened from off-site view. 5. The proposed off-site parking facilities and shared parking facilities shall be protected by an irrevocable covenant in a form approved by the City Attorney. The applicant shall submit a certified copy of the recorded document to the Zoning Administrator. g. The developer shall comply with the following conditions during construction: 1. All City noise ordinances shall be complied with, including that there be no construction activity between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. 2. The applicant shall pay park dedication and trail dedication fees. 3. The site shall be kept free of dust and debris that could blow onto neighborhood properties. 4. Public streets shall be maintained free of dirt and shall be cleaned as necessary. 5. The City shall be contacted a minimum of 72 hours prior to any work in a public street. Work in a public street shall take place only upon the determination by the Director of Public Works that appropriate safety measures have been taken to ensure motorist and pedestrian safety. h. Prior to the issuance of any temporary or permanent occupancy permit the following shall be completed: 1. Fire lanes shall be signed and striped in accordance with the signed Official Exhibits. 2. Landscaping and irrigation shall be in accordance with the signed Official Exhibits. 3. Exterior building improvements shall be completed in accordance with the signed Official Exhibits and approved materials and colors. 4. All mechanical equipment shall be installed and it shall be demonstrated that all such equipment is fully screened from off-site views. To protect the health, safety and welfare of the community, the painting of mechanical equipment shall not be considered screening. i. No outside storage is permitted. Incidental outside storage shall be removed within 48 hours. City Council Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 4b) Page 12 Title: DLC Apartments PUD Minor Amendment 34. The Planned Unit Development shall be amended on January 18, 2011 to incorporate all of the preceding conditions with amendments to conditions relating to Lot 3, Block 1, THE SHOPS AT WEST END, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 35. The Planned Unit Development shall be amended on August 19, 2013, to incorporate all of the preceding conditions with an amendment to condition #4 relating to the total building area of restaurants allowed on the combination of Lot 4, Block 1 and Lot 2, Block 2, THE SHOPS AT WEST END, Hennepin County, Minnesota. a. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant and property owner shall sign the Official Exhibits. 36. The Planned Unit Development shall be amended on October 7, 2013, to incorporate all of the preceding conditions and add the following conditions relating Lot 1, Block 1, THE SHOPS AT WEST END, Hennepin County, Minnesota. a. The PUD major amendment is approved for the development of a six-story, 158- unit multiple-family dwelling with structured parking at 5245 Wayzata Boulevard. b. PUD modifications are approved to allow: 1. Floor area ratio of 2.5. 2. Housing density of 99 units per acre. 3. Front (north) yard of 14.9 feet. 4. Side (westeast) yard of 29.2 feet. 5. Side (eastwest) yard of 11.4 feet. c. The site shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with the Official Exhibits from Zoning Application 13-31-PUD, such documents incorporated by reference herein. d. The developer shall comply with the conditions outlined in the City Engineering memorandum dated September 13, 2013. e. Agreement for public access across “New Street” shall be protected by an irrevocable covenant in a form approved by the City Attorney. f. A public sidewalk easement will be required over the proposed sidewalk along Wayzata Boulevard. g. Ingress/egress agreements across New Street and the “hammerhead” maneuvering space between Lot 1 and Lot 3, Block 1, THE SHOPS AT WEST END, shall be protected by an irrevocable covenant in a form approved by the City Attorney. h. The development specifications shall require installation and maintenance of a high-speed overhead door to reduce the wait time for vehicles entering the garage. i. No outside storage is permitted. Incidental outside storage shall be removed within 48 hours. City Council Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 4b) Page 13 Title: DLC Apartments PUD Minor Amendment j. Prior to starting any site work, the following conditions shall be met: 1. The owner/applicant shall sign an Assent Form and the Official Exhibits. 2. The agreements required by conditions 36e. and 36g. shall be executed. 3. Developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City that addresses the conditions of approval and performance guarantees for public and exterior site improvements. The Mayor and City Manager are authorized to execute said Planning Development Contract. 4. All necessary permits must be obtained. 5. A preconstruction meeting shall be held with the appropriate development, construction and City representatives. k. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the following conditions shall be met: 1. Plans shall be reviewed by the City Engineer and Zoning Administrator to ensure that all proposed utilities, public access points and construction documents conform to the requirements of the City Code of Ordinances and City policies. 2. Tree replacement fees shall be paid. 3. Park dedication and trail dedication fees shall be paid. Fees will be based on the fee schedule at the time the building permits are issued and will be pro-rated based on any previous fees paid based on the commercial use of the property. 4. Developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City that addressed the conditions of approval and performance guarantees for public and exterior site improvements. l. The developer shall comply with the following conditions during construction: 1. All City noise ordinances shall be complied with, including that there be no construction activity between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. weekdays, and 10 p.m. and 9 a.m. on weekends and holidays. 2. The site shall be kept free of dust and debris that could blow onto neighborhood properties. 3. Public streets shall be maintained free of dirt and shall be cleaned as necessary. 4. The City shall be contacted a minimum of 72 hours prior to any work in a public street. Work in a public street shall take place only upon the determination by the Director of Public Works that appropriate safety measures have been taken to ensure motorist and pedestrian safety. 5. Pedestrian access along all public streets shall be maintained throughout the duration of construction in accordance with ADA requirements. This will include signing, striping, detour signing, and any other measures needed to assure compliance and general public safety. m. Prior to the issuance of any permanent occupancy permit the following shall be completed: 1. Fire lanes shall be signed and striped as required by the Fire Marshal. 2. Landscaping and irrigation shall be in accordance with the signed Official Exhibits. 3. Exterior building improvements shall be completed in accordance with the signed Official Exhibits and approved materials and colors. City Council Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 4b) Page 14 Title: DLC Apartments PUD Minor Amendment 4. All mechanical equipment shall be installed and it shall be demonstrated that all such equipment is fully screened from off-site views. 37. The Planned Unit Development shall be amended on April 21, 2014, to incorporate all of the preceding conditions with amendments to condition #36b. regarding yards, and to amend the Official Exhibits to reflect minor changes in the unit mix, number of bedrooms, and number and design of parking stalls for Lot 1, Block 1, THE SHOPS AT WEST END, Hennepin County, Minnesota. In addition to any other remedies, the developer or owner shall pay an administrative fee of $750 per violation of any condition of this approval. The City Clerk is instructed to record certified copies of this resolution in the Office of the Hennepin County Register of Deeds or Registrar of Titles as the case may be. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council April 21, 2014 City Manager Mayor Attest: City Clerk March 31, 2014 MEMORANDUM TO: Sean Walther Senior Planner FROM: Justin Merkovich – ESG Architects RE: PUD – Minor Amendment Sean, See below for a narrative describing the changes between the approved plan and the current design found in the recently submitted “Footing and Foundation Permit Application” dated March 7, 2014. The attached shows an annotated title sheet, with notes overlaid in red, describing the changes to the overall gross square footage, unit mix, bedroom count, and parking count. Through design development we have been able to make alterations to the parking levels that have allowed an additional (5) parking stalls. The project as already approved met the parking requirement of 1 stall/bedroom + guest stalls and the proposed modifications also meet the 1 stall/bedroom mark with additional guest stalls. Throughout the entitlement process it was clear that the Planning Commission and City Council wished to see a higher count of 2 and 3 Bed units and fewer Studios within the mix. Being mindful of the city’s guidance throughout design development, we set a goal of converting Studios to 1 Beds, and 1 Bed + Dens into 2 Beds. The 3 Bed unit count is unchanged. The additional parking that emerged in design development was critical to the added 2 Bed units while reducing the Studios and 1 Bed + Den units to stay within the original unit count as approved. Design development also allowed us to improve the efficiency of the building and reduce the overall gross square footage of the building by 3,455 square feet. Thank you, Justin Merkovich Designer Elness Swenson Graham Architects, Inc. 500 Washington Avenue South; Suite 1080 Minneapolis, MN 55415 p: 612.373.4615 f: 612.852.4484 e: justin.merkovich@esgarch.com City Council Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 4b) Title: DLC Apartments PUD Minor Amendment Page 15 XXXXX'-X"EL =T.O. XXXEL = XX'-X"SECTION ANDELEVATION REFINTERIORELEVATION REFDETAIL REFWALL TYPE(SEE SHEET A10.1)WINDOW TYPE(SEE SHEET A11.2)ELEVATION REFSPOT ELEVATION REFFLOOR FINISHTRANSITION REFXXXAX.XXXXXXXXXXEXTERIOR ELEVATIONKEYNOTE REFROOM NAMEAND NUMBERDOOR NUMBERSECTIONKEYNOTE REFREVISION NUMBERFIRE EXTINGUISHERCABINETFIRE EXTINGUISHER -WALL MOUNTEDROOMXXXXXX XXelness swenson graham architects500 washington avenue southminneapolis minnesota 55415p. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 5 0 8f. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 3 8 2w w w . e s g a r c h . c o mI hereby certify that this document wasprepared by me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly licensed architectunder the laws of the State of MinnesotaSignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense # DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS4/4/2014 11:52:50 AMT1.1TITLE SHEET213511.00LB, MMMMMILLENNIUM at WEST ENDMINOR PUDAMENDMENTMILLENNIUM atWEST END5245 Wayzata BoulevardSt. Louis Park, MN 55416PROJECT TEAMBUILDING AREAPROJECT LOCATIONSHEET INDEXMILLENNIUM at WEST ENDOWNER /DLC MILLENIUM AT WEST END, LLCDEVELOPER:1920 EAST HALLANDALE BEACH BLVDHALLANDALE BEACH, FLA 33009Phone:-Fax:-ARCHITECT:ELNESS SWENSON GRAHAM ARCHITECTS INC.500 Washington Ave South, Suite 1080Minneapolis, MN 55415Phone:612-339-5508Fax:612-339-5382LANDSCAPE: MFRA, INC.14800 28th Ave North, Suite 140Plymouth, MN 55447Phone:763-259-6013Fax:CIVIL:MFRA, INC.14800 28th Ave North, Suite 140Plymouth, MN 55447Phone:763-259-6013Fax:MECHANICALMAJOR MECHANICAL& PLUMBING11201 86th Avenue NorthENGINEERS:Maple Grove, MN 55369Phone:763-424-6680Fax:-STRUCTURALMEYER BORGMAN JOHNSONENGINEER:12 South Sixth Street, Suite 810Minneapolis, MN 55402Phone:612-338-0713Fax:612-337-53255245 WAYZATA BOULEVARD | ST. LOUIS PARK, MN | 55416SHEETNUMBERSHEET NAMEDEMO, GRADING, AND PILE - 12/6/13FOOTING & FOUNDATION PERMIT - 3/7/14 MINOR AMENDMENT - 4/4/14-A10.1WALL TYPES - EXTERIOR●A10.1aWALL TYPES - INTERIORA10.2INTERIOR DETAILS●A10.3INTERIOR DETAILSA11.1DOOR SCHEDULES / DOOR AND WINDOW TYPES / TYPICAL DOORDETAILS●A11.2WINDOW AND STOREFRONT TYPES AND DETAILS●INTERIORSID1.1nFIRST FLOOR FINISH PLAN - NORTHID1.1sFIRST FLOOR FINISH PLAN - SOUTHID1.2nSECOND THRU FIFTH FLOOR FINISH PLAN - NORTHID1.2sSECOND THRU FIFTH FLOOR FINISH PLAN - SOUTHID1.4nSIXTH FLOOR FINISH PLAN - NORTHID1.4sSIXTH FLOOR FINISH PLAN - SOUTHID1.11ENLARGED FIRST FLOOR AMENITY FINISH PLANRID1.12ENLARGED SIXTH FLOOR AMENITY FINISH PLANSRID2.1FIRST FLOOR AMENITY FFE PLANID2.2SIXTH FLOOR AMENITY FFE PLANID2.3NORTH PLAZA FEE PLANID2.4SOUTH PLAZA FFE PLANSTRUCTURALS0.01LEGEND SHEET●S0.02GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES●S2.00nFOUNDATION PLAN - NORTH●S2.00sFOUNDATION PLAN - SOUTH●S2.01nLEVEL P1 FRAMING PLAN - NORTH●S2.01sLEVEL P1 FRAMING PLAN - SOUTH●S2.01R LEVEL P1 SLAB REINFORCING PLAN●S2.1nLEVEL 1 FRAMING PLAN - NORTH●S2.1sLEVEL 1 FRAMING PLAN - SOUTH●S2.1TLEVEL 1 TERRACE FRAMING PLANS●S2.1RLEVEL 1 SLAB REINFORCING PLAN●S2.2nLEVEL 2 FRAMING PLAN - NORTH●S2.2sLEVEL 2 FRAMING PLAN - SOUTH●S2.2RLEVEL 2 SLAB REINFORCING PLAN●S2.2n_W LEVEL 2 WOOD FRAMING PLAN - NORTHRS2.2s_W LEVEL 2 WOOD FRAMING PLAN - SOUTHRS3.1CONCRETE SHEAR WALL ELEVATIONS●S3.2CONCRETE SHEAR WALL DETAILS●S4.1CONCRETE SCHEDULES AND TYPICAL DETAILS●S4.2CONCRETE SCHEDULES AND TYPICAL DETAILS●S4.3TYPICAL POST-TENSION DETAILS●S4.4CONCRETE BEAM SCHEDULE AND TYPICAL POST-TENSION DETAILS●S4.5MASONRY SCHEDULES AND TYPICAL DETAILS●S5.1STRUCTURAL FOUNDAITON DETAILS●S5.10STRUCTURAL CONCRETE FRAMING DETAILS●S5.11STRUCTURAL CONCRETE FRAMING DETAILSS5.20STRUCTURAL CONCRETE FRAMING DETAILS●S5.21STRUCTURAL CONCRETE FRAMING DETAILSS7.1TYPICAL WOOD SCHEDULES AND DETAILSRS7.2TYPICAL WOOD SCHEDULES AND DETAILSRS7.3TYPICAL WOOD SCHEDULES AND DETAILSRS7.4TYPICAL WOOD SCHEDULES AND DETAILSRS7.10STRUCTURAL WOOD FRAMING DETAILSRS7.11STRUCTURAL WOOD FRAMING DETAILSRS7.20STRUCTURAL WOOD FRAMING DETAILSS7.21STRUCTURAL WOOD FRAMING DETAILSPLUMBINGP----MECHANICALM----ELECTRICALE----SHEETNUMBERSHEET NAMEDEMO, GRADING, AND PILE - 12/6/13FOOTING & FOUNDATION PERMIT - 3/7/14 MINOR AMENDMENT - 4/4/14-GENERAL INFORMATIONT1.1 TITLE SHEET●● ●T1.2 ARCHITECTURAL ABBREVIATIONS●●CODEAC1.1 ARCHITECTURAL CODE PLAN - PARKING LEVELS●●AC1.2 ARCHITECTURAL CODE PLAN - FIRST LEVEL AND CODE REVIEW●●AC1.3 ARCHITECTURAL CODE PLAN - UPPER LEVELS●RCIVILC1.01 TITLE SHEET●●C2.01 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN●RC2.02 DEMOLITION PLAN●●C3.01 SITE PLAN●●C4.01 GRADING PLAN●●C5.01 EROSION & SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN - PHASE 1●●C5.02 EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN - PHASE II●●C5.03 EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN - DETAILS●●C6.01 UTILITY PLAN●●C6.02 INFILTRATION DETAILS●C9.01 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS R●C9.02 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS R●C9.03 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS●C10.01 LIGHTING PLAN RLANDSCAPEL1.01 SITE LANDSCAPE PLAN R RL1.02 SITE LANDSCAPE DETAILS R RARCHITECTURALAS1.1 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN●● ●A0.1 PARKING LEVEL P1 SLAB EDGE PLAN●A0.2 FIRST AND SECOND FLOOR SLAB EDGE PLANS●A1.00n PARKING LEVEL P2 - NORTH●● ●A1.00s PARKING LEVEL P2 - SOUTH●● ●A1.01 n PARKING LEVEL P1 - NORTH●● ●A1.01 s PARKING LEVEL P1 - SOUTH●● ●A1.1n FIRST FLOOR - NORTH REF●●A1.1s FIRST FLOOR - SOUTH REF●●A1.2n SECOND FLOOR - NORTH REF●●A1.2s SECOND FLOOR - SOUTH REF●●A1.3n THIRD THRU FIFTH FLOOR - NORTH REF R●A1.3s THIRD THRU FIFTH FLOOR - SOUTH REF R●A1.4n SIXTH FLOOR - NORTH REF R●A1.4s SIXTH FLOOR - SOUTH REF R●A1.5n ROOF PLAN - NORTH REF R●A1.5s ROOF PLAN - SOUTH●A2.0 PARKING LEVEL RCPsA2.1n FIRST FLOOR RCP - NORTHA2.1s FIRST FLOOR RCP - SOUTHA2.2n SECOND THRU FIFTH FLOOR RCP - NORTHA2.2s SECOND THRU FIFTH FLOOR RCP - SOUTHA2.3n SIXTH FLOOR RCP - NORTHA2.3s SIXTH FLOOR RCP - SOUTHA2.4 ENLARGED FIRST FLOOR RCPA3.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS R●A3.2 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS R●A3.3 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS R●A3.4 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS R●A3.5 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS R●A3.6 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS RA4.1 BUILDING SECTIONS R●A4.2 BUILDING SECTIONS R●A4.3 BUILDING SECTIONS●A5.1 WALL SECTIONS - BRICK R●A5.2 WALL SECTIONS - METAL PANEL●A5.3 WALL SECTIONS●A5.4WALL SECTIONS - AT PLAZA●A5.5WALL SECTIONS - PARTIAL●A5.6WALL SECTIONS - PLAZA●A5.7WALL SECTIONS - PLAZA●A6.1EXTERIOR DETAILS●A6.2EXTERIOR DETAILS●A6.3EXTERIOR DETAILS●A6.4EXTERIOR DETAILS●A6.5EXTERIOR DETAILSR●A6.6EXTERIOR DETAILS - PARAPETSA7.1STAIR 'A' SECTION / PLANS AND TYPICAL STAIR DETAILSR●A7.2STAIR 'B' SECTION / PLANSR●A7.3ELEVATOR SECTION / PLANS AND TYPICAL DETAILSR●A8.1ENLARGED UNIT PLANSRA8.2ENLARGED UNIT PLANSRA8.3ENLARGED UNIT PLANSRA8.4ENLARGED UNIT PLANSRA8.5ENLARGED FLOOR PLANS●A8.6ENLARGED FIRST FLOOR AMENITY PLANRA8.7ENLARGED SIXTH FLOOR AMENITY PLANRA9.1INTERIOR ELEVATIONSA9.2INTERIOR ELEVATIONSA9.3INTERIOR ELEVATIONSA9.4INTERIOR ELEVATIONS - UNIT KITCHENSUNIT MIXUnit Distribution SummaryUnit Type Units BRsLEVEL 11 BED 12 122 BED 9 183 BED 1 322 33LEVEL 2STUDIO 4 41 BED 10 101 BED + DEN 2 22 BED 11 223 BED 1 328 41LEVEL 3STUDIO 4 41 BED 10 101 BED + DEN 2 22 BED 11 223 BED 1 328 41LEVEL 4STUDIO 4 41 BED 10 101 BED + DEN 2 22 BED 11 223 BED 1 328 41LEVEL 5STUDIO 4 41 BED 10 101 BED + DEN 2 22 BED 11 223 BED 1 328 41LEVEL 6STUDIO 1 11 BED 12 121 BED + DEN 2 22 BED 8 163 BED 1 324 34158 231Total Gross AreaLevel Use Total GSFLEVEL P2 PARKING40,440 SFLEVEL P1 PARKING40,440 SFLEVEL 1 AMENITY/RES 28,155 SFLEVEL 2 RESIDENTIAL 28,378 SFLEVEL 3 RESIDENTIAL 28,378 SFLEVEL 4 RESIDENTIAL 28,378 SFLEVEL 5 RESIDENTIAL 28,378 SFLEVEL 6 RESIDENTIAL 25,551 SF248,098 SFApartment Rentable AreaLevel AreaLEVEL 119,898 SFLEVEL 224,947 SFLEVEL 324,947 SFLEVEL 424,947 SFLEVEL 524,947 SFLEVEL 621,549 SF141,236 SFParking AreaLevel AreaLEVEL P2 40,440 SFLEVEL P1 40,440 SF80,880 SFParking (Covered + Surface and Bikes)Level Count Description Bike ParkingLEVEL P2 1 COMPACT1LEVEL P2 4 COMPACT STALL 8 0 x 16 4LEVEL P2 21 COMPACT STALL 8 0 x 18 19LEVEL P2 95 STANDARD STALL5012174LEVEL P1 7 ACCESSIBLE STALL0LEVEL P1 3 COMPACT STALL 8 0 x 16 3LEVEL P1 20 COMPACT STALL 8 0 x 18 18LEVEL P1 78 STANDARD STALL3610857LEVEL 1 14 SURFACE - PARALLEL STALL 0140243131Unit MixUnit Type Units %STUDIO17 11%1 BED64 41%1 BED + DEN 10 6%2 BED61 39%3 BED6 4%158 100%Amenity/Lobby AreaLevel AreaLEVEL 1 5,385 SFLEVEL 6 609 SF5,994 SFApartment Gross AreaLevel Use Total GSFLEVEL 1 AMENITY/RES 28,155 SFLEVEL 2 RESIDENTIAL 28,378 SFLEVEL 3 RESIDENTIAL 28,378 SFLEVEL 4 RESIDENTIAL 28,378 SFLEVEL 5 RESIDENTIAL 28,378 SFLEVEL 6 RESIDENTIAL 25,551 SF167,218 SFELECTRICALT.B.D.ENGINEER:--Phone:-Fax:-SYMBOLS LEGENDPARKING COUNTNo. Description DateCity Council Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 4b) Title: DLC Apartments PUD Minor AmendmentPage 16 DNDNDNDNDWREFREFDNDW REFREF REFDN881.00881.00884.08100' - 0"881.92882.17882.50884.08882.50881.67879.50884.17878.83875.17875.80876.05876.72876.83877.50882.00878.75879.40878.94878.92881.00882.50884.0840' - 0 5/16"120' - 0"4' - 5"45' - 1 7/16"337' - 0"10' - 1 3/8"881.67882.0015' - 0"11' - 0 15/16"16' - 3 3/8"17' - 3 7/8"15' - 3"884.08NOTE:PERIMITER FENCING AT POOLAREA SHALL BE 5'-0" ABOVEADJACENT GRADES. INTERNALFENCING SHALL BE 5'-0" ABOVEWALKING SURFACE878.17876.03876.01882.12882.17884.08882.8610' - 4"11' - 4"11' - 3 1/2"11' - 11 7/32"NOTE:RETAINING WALL IS A REMOVABLESTACKED STONE WALLWITH A REMOVABLE GRAVELFOOTING31' - 9 19/32"29' - 2 13/32"32' - 10 13/16"33' - 2 13/32"33' - 6"33' - 8 5/32"43' - 0"1B4AS1.13AS1.1DOUBLE GATE6' - 0"DOUBLE GATE7' - 0"PROVIDE INTEGRAL8" HIGH x 8" WIDECIP CONCRETE CURB3 1/2x3 1/2x1/4 GALVANIZEDCORNER POSTS4 1/2"4' - 0"6' - 0"8' - 8"2' - 3 1/2"5' - 8 1/2"2' - 5"7' - 0"4 1/2"AS1.16SLAB OUT TO OUT- VERIFY36' - 10"8' - 0"LEVEL 1100' - 0"ABA.14AS1.18"x8" INTEGRALCONCRETE CURB2 1/2xPERFORATEDMETAL PANEL7' - 4"PROVIDE THREE HEAVY-DUTYBARREL HINGES AT EACH GATEHINGE SIDE2x2x3/16 GALVANIZED HSS "X"BRACING AT EACH GATEPERFORATED METAL PANEL- FASTENTO ANGLES AND DIAGONALS WITHNUT AND BOLT FASTENERS2 1/2 x2x1/4 GALVANIZED ANGLEAT BOTTOM OF GATE PANEL2 x2x1/4 GALVANIZED HSS GATEFRAME- FOUR SIDESGALVANIZED ANCHOR PLATE ATPRIMARY POSTSNOTE:PROVIDE DROP BOLT ATEACH GATE DOOR3 1/2 x 3 1/2x1/4 GALVANIZED HSS1"1"1"3"10 1/2"8"1"2 1/2 x2x1/4 GALVANIZED ANGLEAT TOP OF GATE PANEL2 1/2"2"4x2x1/4 GALVANIZED ANGLE ATTOP OF STRAIGHT PANEL4"3 1/2 x 3 1/2x1/4 GALVANIZED HSS2 x 1x3/16 GALVANIZED HSS XBRACING AT GATES, TYPPERFORATED METAL PANEL- FASTENTO ANGLES AND DIAGONALS WITHNUT AND BOLT FASTENERS2 1/2 x2x1/4 GALVANIZED ANGLEAT BOTTOM OF GATE PANEL3 1/2 x 3 1/2x1/4 GALVANIZED HSS5"1/2"1/2"4"3"GALVANIZED 8" LONG ANCHORPLATE AT PRIMARY POSTSNOTE:PROVIDE DROP BOLT ATEACH GATE DOORLEVEL 1100' - 0"1LEVEL P189' - 8"17'-2 1/2"UTILITY EASEMENT EXCAVATION AREA10'-0"PROPERTY LINEAT NORTHWEST CORNEREASEMENT SETBACKAT NORTHWEST CORNER6"CO14R32" RIGID INSULATIONTRASNFORMER PAD- COORDINATE PADOPENINGS AND REINFORCING WITHEXCEL ENERGY- DO NOT ENCROACHINTO UTILITY EASEMENT- CONTACTTHE ARCHITECT IN CASE OF CONFLICTTRANSFORMERSCREEN WALL WITH GATESAS1.15SOUTHNORTHelness swenson graham architects500 washington avenue southminneapolis minnesota 55415p. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 5 0 8f. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 3 8 2w w w . e s g a r c h . c o mI hereby certify that this document wasprepared by me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly licensed architectunder the laws of the State of MinnesotaSignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense # DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONSKEY PLANNORTH4/10/2014 12:20:25 PMAS1.1ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN213511.00LB, MMMMMILLENNIUM at WEST ENDMINOR PUDAMENDMENTMILLENNIUM atWEST END5245 Wayzata BoulevardSt. Louis Park, MN 55416 1/16" = 1'-0"AS1.11SITE PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0"AS1.12SCREEN WALL PLAN AT ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT 1/4" = 1'-0"AS1.13SCREEN WALL ELEVATION 1 1/2" = 1'-0"AS1.16ANCHOR PLATE PLAN DETAIL 1 1/2" = 1'-0"AS1.15ELECTRICAL ENCLOSURE SCREEN GATE SECTION 1/2" = 1'-0"AS1.14WALL SECTION AT TRANSFORMER/GENERATOR ENCLOSURENo. Description DateCity Council Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 4b) Title: DLC Apartments PUD Minor AmendmentPage 17 1A6BCDEFGHJ35425.93.41.1A.12A4.22A5.11A5.13.71A3.23A3.41A3.5A7.12A7.32117' - 7"2A5.33A5.228' - 8"27' - 0"25' - 8"27' - 0"27' - 4"27' - 4"27' - 0"17' - 2"2' - 0"2' - 0"15' - 8"27' - 8"11' - 8"6' - 4"10' - 6"27' - 2"17' - 0"2' - 0"M83M81CO103M834' - 1 5/8"2' - 0"15' - 8"27' - 8"11' - 8"6' - 4"10' - 6"27' - 2"17' - 0"2' - 0"P253ELECP250ELEV LOBBY4' - 3"2' - 4"3' - 4"1' - 8"1' - 8"2' - 2"2' - 2"7' - 4"3' - 8"3' - 8"2' - 10"6"6"1' - 10"3' - 4"3' - 8"2' - 8"3' - 8"3' - 8"9' - 6"9' - 6"6"4"4"3' - 4"3' - 4"1' - 4"1' - 4"3' - 2"3' - 2"2' - 2"2' - 4"1' - 8"6"2A4.31A5.31A4.34AS1.1P250ST-A-P2P253P252PARKINGST-A-P2STAIR A2A5.51A5.615' - 0"2' - 4"5' - 0"5' - 4"FD80' - 5"80' - 5"80' - 5"80' - 5"80' - 5"80' - 8"80' - 5"80' - 8"80' - 5"80' - 8"80' - 5"80' - 10"80' - 10"80' - 10"80' - 10"81' - 0"80' - 8 3/32"80' - 8"80' - 8"80' - 3"80' - 10"2A5.63A5.6CO14R3CO14R3M81M81CO14R3CO14R31A4.12A5.21A5.280' - 9"80' - 9"80' - 9"80' - 9"80' - 10"80' - 8"80' - 9"80' - 8"80' - 9"80' - 8"80' - 9"80' - 10"80' - 10"80' - 10"80' - 10"81' - 0"80' - 8 3/32"80' - 8"80' - 8"80' - 3"80' - 10"CO12RCO10RCO10R8"2' - 4"PERIMETER DRAINTILE SUMP PUMPELEVATOR PITSUMP PUMPEQEQEQEQ3A5.5CO8Ra25' - 0"10' - 0"7' - 4"SOUTHNORTHelness swenson graham architects500 washington avenue southminneapolis minnesota 55415p. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 5 0 8f. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 3 8 2w w w . e s g a r c h . c o mI hereby certify that this document wasprepared by me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly licensed architectunder the laws of the State of MinnesotaSignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense # DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONSKEY PLANNORTH4/4/2014 11:52:19 AMA1.00nPARKING LEVEL P2 - NORTH213511.00LB, MMMMMILLENNIUM at WEST ENDMINOR PUDAMENDMENTMILLENNIUM atWEST END5245 Wayzata BoulevardSt. Louis Park, MN 55416 1/8" = 1'-0"A1.00n1PARKING LEVEL P2 PLAN NORTHNo. Description DateCity Council Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 4b) Title: DLC Apartments PUD Minor AmendmentPage 18 1166GHJKLMPN335544225.95.9N.93.43.41.11.13.73.73A5.11A3.32A3.31A4.21A4.2A7.32A7.22117' - 7"2' - 0"25' - 8"17' - 8"28' - 2"27' - 0"27' - 4"28' - 8"27' - 0"2' - 0"15' - 8"27' - 8"11' - 8"6' - 4"10' - 6"27' - 2"17' - 0"2' - 0"CO14R3CO14R3M12CO14R3M83M81CO103M83CO12M834' - 1 5/8"P250ELEV LOBBY4' - 3"2' - 4"3' - 4"1' - 8"1' - 8"2' - 2"2' - 2"3' - 4"3' - 4"1' - 4"1' - 4"1' - 6"2' - 6"2' - 0"3' - 8"1' - 6"1' - 6"1' - 8"2' - 0"11"3' - 2"3' - 2"2' - 2"2A4.31A5.31A4.3P250ST-B-P2ST-B-P2STAIR BP252PARKING2A5.781' - 4"82' - 0"82' - 6 3/16"83' - 0 15/32"82' - 0"83' - 6"84' - 1"84' - 3 3/8"83' - 8 11/32"81' - 4"81' - 4"80' - 5"80' - 5"80' - 5"80' - 5"80' - 8"80' - 5"80' - 8"80' - 5"80' - 10"80' - 10"80' - 3"80' - 10"80' - 10"80' - 10"5A5.71A5.7CO14R3CO14R3CO14R3CO14R3CO12RCO10RCO10R1A4.12A4.12A5.21A5.24A5.73A5.77A3.51' - 2"14' - 4"FLOOR DRAINTO STORM2' - 6"5' - 0"4' - 4"81' - 4"82' - 0"82' - 0"83' - 6"84' - 1"84' - 3 3/8"83' - 8 11/32"81' - 4"81' - 4"80' - 9"80' - 9"80' - 9"80' - 9"80' - 8"80' - 9"80' - 8"80' - 10"80' - 10"80' - 10"80' - 3"80' - 10"80' - 10"80' - 10"80' - 10"CL0P254BIKE STORAGEP254ELEVATOR PITSUMP PUMP1A6BCDEFGHJKLMPN35425.9N.93.41.1A.13.7117' - 7"FD2' - 6"4' - 0"2' - 6"4' - 0"120' - 0"EQEQNOTE:1) PROVIDE INTERIOR 6"PERFORATED DRAIN TILE IN FILTERFABRIC-SET IN A TWO-FOOT WIDE BED OFFREE-DRAINING RIVER ROCK2) PROVIDE FLOOR SLAB PRESSURERELIEF PORTS AT 36 FEET ONCENTER EACH WAY3) FINAL DESIGN TO BE CONFIRMEDWITH HYDROLOGY STUDYDRAINTILEEXTERIOR PERIMETER DRAIN TILE- LINE ISGRAPHIC ONLY- SEE DRAIN TILE DETAIL FOREXACT PLACEMENT AT FOUNDATION/ FOOTINGSDRAINTILEDRAINTILEDRAINTILEDRAINTILEEXTERIOR PERIMETER DRAIN TILE- LINE ISGRAPHIC ONLY- SEE DRAIN TILE DETAIL FOREXACT PLACEMENT AT FOUNDATION/ FOOTINGSDRAIN TILE ATELEVATOR- FINALDESIGN/ LOCATIONS TBDSUMP PIT-DRAIN TOSTORMSUMP PIT-DRAIN TOSTORM36' - 0"36' - 0"RELIEF PORT GRID36' - 0"36' - 0"36' - 0"RELIEF PORT GRID36' - 0"6' - 2"6' - 0"6' - 0"FLOORDRAINRELIEFPORTSOUTHNORTHelness swenson graham architects500 washington avenue southminneapolis minnesota 55415p. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 5 0 8f. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 3 8 2w w w . e s g a r c h . c o mI hereby certify that this document wasprepared by me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly licensed architectunder the laws of the State of MinnesotaSignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense # DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONSKEY PLANNORTH4/4/2014 11:52:23 AMA1.00sPARKING LEVEL P2 - SOUTH213511.00LB, MMMMMILLENNIUM at WEST ENDMINOR PUDAMENDMENTMILLENNIUM atWEST END5245 Wayzata BoulevardSt. Louis Park, MN 55416 1/8" = 1'-0"A1.00s1PARKING LEVEL P2 PLAN SOUTH 1" = 20'-0"A1.00s2P2 SUB-SLAB DRAINAGE PLANNo. Description DateCity Council Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 4b) Title: DLC Apartments PUD Minor AmendmentPage 19 DNDN1A6BCDEFGHJ35425.93.41.1A.12A4.22A5.11A5.13.71A3.23A3.41A3.5CLEAR4' - 10"CLEAR5' - 0"A7.33A7.1318' - 10"17' - 4"22' - 7 1/2"18' - 0"18' - 0"16' - 4"2A5.33A5.2P153WATER SERVICECO14R3CO10RCO8Ra23CO10RCO8Ra23CO8Ra23CO14R32' - 6"2A4.31A5.31A4.34AS1.1875.17P150ELEV LOBBYP151TRASHP152PARKINGST-A-P1STAIR AP151P150P153ST-A-P1ST-A-P1AP152AP1522A5.51A5.66' - 4"19' - 0"TYP ATCENTERRIDGETYP AT P1 DRAINSTYP AT P1 EXTERIORWALLS, UNO5' - 0"5' - 4"4' - 4"8' - 6"FLOOROPENINGCO10R3' - 2"89' - 3"89' - 8"89' - 8"89' - 6"89' - 3"89' - 6"89' - 3"89' - 8"89' - 10"89' - 10"89' - 8"89' - 8"89' - 8"89' - 3"89' - 8"89' - 6"89' - 3"89' - 6"89' - 3"89' - 6"89' - 8"89' - 8"89' - 8"89' - 8"89' - 10"89' - 8"89' - 8"89' - 8 1/2"92' - 0"89' - 8"89' - 8"91' - 10 1/2"18' - 0"4' - 8"89' - 8 1/2"89' - 8"TYP AT P1 DRAINS89' - 3 3/32"89' - 10"89' - 3 1/32"30' - 7 1/4"29' - 4 3/4"29' - 4 3/4"30' - 7 1/4"CONDENSERS2A5.63A5.6CO14R3CO8R16CO8Ra23CO8Ra23CO8R161A4.12A5.21A5.24A5.61A5.42A5.43AS1.18' - 0"4A6.1CO8Ra25' - 2"5' - 10"6' - 0"3A5.522' - 0"22' - 0"S8a2M8Ra23M8Ra2389' - 8"91' - 0"1:20SOUTHNORTHelness swenson graham architects500 washington avenue southminneapolis minnesota 55415p. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 5 0 8f. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 3 8 2w w w . e s g a r c h . c o mI hereby certify that this document wasprepared by me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly licensed architectunder the laws of the State of MinnesotaSignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense # DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONSKEY PLANNORTH4/4/2014 11:52:26 AMA1.01 nPARKING LEVEL P1 - NORTH213511.00LB, MMMMMILLENNIUM at WEST ENDMINOR PUDAMENDMENTMILLENNIUM atWEST END5245 Wayzata BoulevardSt. Louis Park, MN 55416 1/8" = 1'-0"A1.01 n1PARKING LEVEL P1 PLAN NORTHNo. Description DateCity Council Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 4b) Title: DLC Apartments PUD Minor AmendmentPage 20 16GHJKLMPN35425.9N.93.41.13.73A5.11A3.32A3.31A4.21A4.2A7.23A7.3318' - 10"17' - 4"22' - 7 1/2"18' - 0"18' - 0"CO14R32' - 6"3A3.52A3.52A4.31A5.31A4.3P150ELEV LOBBYP151TRASHP152PARKINGST-B-P1STAIR BP151P150ST-B-P11' - 8"2A5.7TYP AT P1 DRAINS3' - 2"89' - 3"89' - 8"89' - 8"89' - 7 15/16"89' - 3"89' - 8"89' - 8"89' - 6"89' - 6"89' - 3"89' - 5"89' - 5"89' - 6"89' - 4"89' - 4"89' - 8"89' - 8"89' - 8"89' - 8"89' - 8"89' - 3"89' - 8"89' - 6"89' - 3"89' - 8"89' - 4"88' - 4"86' - 10"88' - 4"87' - 4"84' - 4"82' - 0"82' - 10"82' - 11"86' - 2"89' - 9"89' - 8"89' - 9"89' - 8"89' - 10"89' - 3 1/32"CONDENSERS6A5.75A5.71A5.74A5.5CO14R3CO12CO12CO14R3CO14R31A4.12A4.12A5.21A5.24A5.73A5.75A6.17A3.58A5.77A5.7M836"x48" ACCESSPANEL3' - 4"7' - 0"P155POOLEQUIPMENTP155P156CL0M8M8NOTE:PROVIDESIDEWALL SLEEVEIN WALL FOR POOLBOILER FLUE3' - 2"5' - 0"2' - 0"14' - 4"8' - 0"11' - 8"CL0P157P154CRAWL SPACEP154POOLABOVEP157BIKE STORAGEP156BIKE STORAGECO8Ra26' - 0"10' - 0"1' - 10"CO8Ra2CO8Ra2CO8Ra2CO8Ra22' - 10"5' - 2"6' - 0"5' - 2"3' - 10"6' - 0"3' - 10"5' - 2"6' - 0"5' - 2"5' - 10"6' - 0"7' - 4"6' - 2"4' - 1"7' - 10 1/2"1' - 1 1/2"CO85' - 0"4' - 11"6' - 8"SOUTHNORTHelness swenson graham architects500 washington avenue southminneapolis minnesota 55415p. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 5 0 8f. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 3 8 2w w w . e s g a r c h . c o mI hereby certify that this document wasprepared by me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly licensed architectunder the laws of the State of MinnesotaSignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense # DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONSKEY PLANNORTH4/4/2014 11:52:29 AMA1.01 sPARKING LEVEL P1 - SOUTH213511.00LB, MMMMMILLENNIUM at WEST ENDMINOR PUDAMENDMENTMILLENNIUM atWEST END5245 Wayzata BoulevardSt. Louis Park, MN 55416 1/8" = 1'-0"A1.01 s1PARKING LEVEL P1 PLAN SOUTHNo. Description DateCity Council Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 4b) Title: DLC Apartments PUD Minor AmendmentPage 21 DNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDWREFREF1A6BCDEFGHJ35425.93.41.1A.12A4.22A5.11A5.13.71A3.22A3.43A3.43A3.22A3.24A3.21A3.55A5.5A7.34A7.1429' - 7"2A5.33A5.296' - 10"96' - 10"96' - 10"94' - 8"SLOPED WALK AT 1:20SLOPED WALK AT 1:20126UNIT B10119UNIT B5117UNIT B4115UNIT A1113UNIT A2111UNIT A2109UNIT A1107UNIT B5105UNIT A3A(TYPE A)103UNIT A3101UNIT B6102UNIT B6104UNIT B2110UNIT A2114UNIT C1116UNIT A2ST-A-1STAIR A153STORAGE154ELECTRICAL150ELEVATORLOBBY152TRASH155NORTHCORRIDOR143MENS5A3.54A3.53A3.52A3.52A4.31A5.31A4.34AS1.1ST-A-115415315213543A5.42A5.51A5.6884.17142WOMENS2A5.63A5.6A8.5199' - 11"98' - 4"5' - 9 1/2"5' - 9 1/2"6' - 0"DC82B1DC82B1DC82B1DC82B1DC82B1DC82B1DC82B1DC82B1DC82B1DC82B1DC82B1DC82B1DC82B1DC82B1DC82B1DC82B1DC82B1DC82B1DC82B1DC82B1DC82B15' - 2 3/8"CO8Ra2CO8Ra237' - 2"26' - 7"39' - 0"36' - 0"23' - 4"24' - 6"24' - 6"23' - 4"39' - 5 1/2"29' - 7"22' - 6 1/2"23' - 0 1/2"8' - 0"36' - 10"36' - 4"30' - 8"24' - 6"47' - 9"24' - 6"20' - 1 1/2"5' - 10"32' - 7"29' - 7"5' - 10"29' - 1 1/2"DUAL STAGEPLAZA DRAINDUAL STAGEPLAZA DRAIN1A4.12A5.21A5.24A5.61A5.44A5.45A5.42A6.2149MAIL26' - 0"6A5.521' - 0"7A5.51' - 8"3' - 0"12' - 0"2' - 0 7/8"2' - 4 1/2"1 1/4"A6.4722A5.41' - 10 1/2"2' - 4 1/2"142143143A143AJAN150141140151145OFFICE146OFFICE144CONFERENCE151BWORK ROOM141THE CLUB147VESTIBULE147147A148LOBBY140THE LINK160NORTH PLAZA14896' - 10"96' - 9 31/32"96' - 10"94' - 8"99' - 11"98' - 4"3AS1.1DOUBLE GATE6' - 0"DOUBLE GATE8' - 0"DOUBLE GATE7' - 0"3A6.3AS1.124A6.11261021014' - 0"5' - 6"139137146145144151PACKAGESTORAGE3A5.5A9.28FIRE PIT- SEE INTERIORS/1A1.1s2021222324SOUTHNORTHelness swenson graham architects500 washington avenue southminneapolis minnesota 55415p. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 5 0 8f. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 3 8 2w w w . e s g a r c h . c o mI hereby certify that this document wasprepared by me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly licensed architectunder the laws of the State of MinnesotaSignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense # DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONSKEY PLANNORTH4/4/2014 11:52:38 AMA1.1nFIRST FLOOR - NORTH213511.00LB, MMMMMILLENNIUM at WEST ENDMINOR PUDAMENDMENTMILLENNIUM atWEST END5245 Wayzata BoulevardSt. Louis Park, MN 55416 1/8" = 1'-0"A1.1n1FIRST FLOOR PLAN NORTHNo. Description DateCity Council Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 4b) Title: DLC Apartments PUD Minor AmendmentPage 22 DNDNDNDNDNDNDNDWREFREFDNDN16GHJKLMPN35425.9N.93.41.13.73A5.11A3.32A3.31A3.42A3.44A3.21A4.2A7.24A7.3429' - 7"96' - 10"96' - 10"96' - 10"98' - 0"98' - 4"133UNIT B9131UNIT A1134UNIT B9132UNIT A1130UNIT A1128UNIT B4126UNIT B10119UNIT B5117UNIT B4116UNIT A2ST-B-1STAIR B150ELEVATORLOBBY152TRASH137SOUTHCORRIDOR143MENS5A3.53A3.52A3.52A4.31A5.31A4.3152ST-B-1138GROUP FITNESS139FITNESS1365482A5.7ST-B-1A884.17142WOMENS6A5.75A5.72' - 0"99' - 11"99' - 11"1A5.76' - 0"6' - 8"5' - 0"32' - 10"5' - 0"5' - 0"13' - 9 1/2"6' - 7 1/2"6' - 0"98' - 4"4A5.54' - 0"DC82B1DC82B1DC82B1DC82B1DC82B1DC82B1DC82B1DC82B1DC82B1DC82B1TOPPING CRICKETBELOW PAVERS ANDINSULATIONDUALSTAGEPLAZADRAINDUAL STAGEPLAZA DRAINTOPPING CRICKETBELOW PAVERSAND INSULATION5' - 2 3/8"5' - 0"5' - 0"5' - 0"CO8Ra2S8a2S8a2CO8Ra2CO8Ra2CO8Ra237' - 1"23' - 4"23' - 4"36' - 0"37' - 2"26' - 7"32' - 6"32' - 6"37' - 7"14' - 5"23' - 10"39' - 0"29' - 1 1/2"5' - 10"29' - 7"1A4.12A4.12A5.21A5.24A5.74A5.45A5.43A5.72A6.25A6.15A6.2149MAIL13' - 4"2' - 0"16' - 8"2' - 0"13' - 4"SKIMMERLOCATION (2)4' - 9"1' - 6"25' - 0"1' - 6"171MENS173WOMENS7' - 5 1/4"8' - 4 3/4"7' - 5 1/4"23' - 3 1/4"10' - 4"26' - 0"8' - 0"4A3.373A3.3172STORAGE6A5.51A6.221' - 0"7A5.51' - 8"3' - 0"12' - 0"2' - 0 7/8"2' - 4 1/2"1 1/4"A6.4727A3.58A5.7TOPPING CRICKETBELOW PAVERS ANDINSULATION7A5.75A3.31' - 10 1/2"2' - 4 1/2"142143143A143AJAN150141140151A8.61145OFFICE146OFFICE144CONFERENCE151BWORK ROOM141THE CLUB147VESTIBULE147147A148LOBBY140THE LINK172171173170A170SOUTH PLAZA1489' - 6"96' - 10"96' - 9 31/32"96' - 10"98' - 4"99' - 11"99' - 11"97' - 6"98' - 4"170134132130128126EC6Ba64' - 0"ID2.111' - 4"5' - 6"138139139A13714614514497' - 9"7' - 0"8' - 0"151PACKAGESTORAGEA9.2898' - 9 5/16"98' - 8 5/16"18'-0"17'-0"LINEAR FIREELEMENT- GAS/1 A1.1n 2021222324SOUTHNORTHelness swenson graham architects500 washington avenue southminneapolis minnesota 55415p. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 5 0 8f. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 3 8 2w w w . e s g a r c h . c o mI hereby certify that this document wasprepared by me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly licensed architectunder the laws of the State of MinnesotaSignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense # DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONSKEY PLANNORTH4/4/2014 11:52:47 AMA1.1sFIRST FLOOR - SOUTH213511.00LB, MMMMMILLENNIUM at WEST ENDMINOR PUDAMENDMENTMILLENNIUM atWEST END5245 Wayzata BoulevardSt. Louis Park, MN 55416 1/8" = 1'-0"A1.1s1FIRST FLOOR PLAN SOUTHNo. Description DateCity Council Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 4b) Title: DLC Apartments PUD Minor AmendmentPage 23 1A6BCDEFGHJ35425.93.41.1A.12A4.22A5.11A5.13.71A3.22A3.43A3.43A3.22A3.24A3.21A3.55A5.5A7.15A7.352A5.33A5.2226UNIT B3A(TYPE A)219UNIT B5217UNIT B4215UNIT A1213UNIT A2211UNIT A2209UNIT A1207UNIT B5205UNIT A3A(TYPE A)203UNIT A3201UNIT B6202UNIT B6204UNIT B2210UNIT A2214UNIT C1216UNIT B8222UNIT S2224UNIT B7225UNIT B11221UNIT S3ST-A-2STAIR A253STORAGE254ELECTRICAL250ELEVATORLOBBY251STORAGE252TRASH256STORAGE255NORTHCORRIDOR257SOUTHCORRIDOR5A3.54A3.53A3.52A3.52A4.31A5.31A4.33A5.42A5.5DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1ST-A-2254253252251250256DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B128' - 8"27' - 0"25' - 8"27' - 0"27' - 4"27' - 4"27' - 0"17' - 2"2' - 0"EC8Ba4EC8Ba4EC8Ba4EC8Ba4EW6Ba3EW6Ba5EW6Ba3EW6Ba1EW6Ba32EW6Ba32EW6Ba3EW6Ba12EW6Ba12EW6Ba3EW6Ba32EW6Ba12EW6Ba32EW6Ba12EW6Ba3EW6Ba52EW6Ba5EW6Ba3EW6Ba3EW6Ba12EW6Ba337' - 8"26' - 1"1' - 11 1/8"39' - 0"36' - 0"23' - 4"24' - 6"24' - 6"23' - 4"39' - 5 1/2"29' - 7"22' - 6 1/2"23' - 0 1/2"8' - 0"36' - 10"36' - 4"30' - 8"30' - 8"27' - 11 1/2"47' - 9"24' - 6"20' - 1 1/2"5' - 10"32' - 7"29' - 7"5' - 10"29' - 1 1/2"26' - 10"2' - 0 1/4"1A4.12A5.21A5.21' - 9 1/2"1A5.44A5.45A5.46A5.57A5.52A5.4A9.282324SOUTHNORTHelness swenson graham architects500 washington avenue southminneapolis minnesota 55415p. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 5 0 8f. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 3 8 2w w w . e s g a r c h . c o mI hereby certify that this document wasprepared by me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly licensed architectunder the laws of the State of MinnesotaSignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense # DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONSKEY PLANNORTH4/4/2014 11:52:56 AMA1.2nSECOND FLOOR - NORTH213511.00LB, MMMMMILLENNIUM at WEST ENDMINOR PUDAMENDMENTMILLENNIUM atWEST END5245 Wayzata BoulevardSt. Louis Park, MN 55416 1/8" = 1'-0"A1.2n1SECOND FLOOR PLAN NORTHNo. Description DateCity Council Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 4b) Title: DLC Apartments PUD Minor AmendmentPage 24 16GHJKLMPN35425.9N.93.41.13.73A5.11A3.32A3.31A3.42A3.44A3.21A4.2A7.35A7.25233UNIT B9231UNIT A2234UNIT B9232UNIT A1230UNIT A1228UNIT B4226UNIT B3A(TYPE A)219UNIT B5217UNIT B4216UNIT B8222UNIT S2224UNIT B7229UNIT S1227UNIT S1225UNIT B11221UNIT S3ST-B-2STAIR B250ELEVATORLOBBY251STORAGE252TRASH256STORAGE257SOUTHCORRIDOR6A3.55A3.53A3.52A3.52A4.31A5.31A4.34A5.5DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1ST-B-2252251250256DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B12' - 0"25' - 8"17' - 8"28' - 2"27' - 0"27' - 4"28' - 8"27' - 0"EW6Ba12EW6Ba12EW6Ba3EW6Ba12EW6Ba1EC8Ba4EC8Ba4EC8Ba4EC8Ba4EW6Ba3EW6Ba32EW6Ba3EW6Ba52EW6Ba5EW6Ba3EW6Ba52EW6Ba5EW6Ba1EW6Ba12EW6Ba32EW6Ba3EW6Ba337' - 1"23' - 4"23' - 4"36' - 0"37' - 8"26' - 1"1' - 11 1/8"32' - 6"32' - 6"39' - 0"29' - 1 1/2"5' - 10"29' - 7"37' - 7"8' - 0"25' - 0"18' - 3"18' - 3"41' - 2"26' - 10"2' - 0 1/4"1A4.12A4.12A5.21A5.21' - 9 1/2"4A5.45A5.46A5.57A5.57A3.55A3.3A9.282324SOUTHNORTHelness swenson graham architects500 washington avenue southminneapolis minnesota 55415p. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 5 0 8f. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 3 8 2w w w . e s g a r c h . c o mI hereby certify that this document wasprepared by me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly licensed architectunder the laws of the State of MinnesotaSignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense # DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONSKEY PLANNORTH4/4/2014 11:53:05 AMA1.2sSECOND FLOOR - SOUTH213511.00LB, MMMMMILLENNIUM at WEST ENDMINOR PUDAMENDMENTMILLENNIUM atWEST END5245 Wayzata BoulevardSt. Louis Park, MN 55416 1/8" = 1'-0"A1.2s1SECOND FLOOR PLAN SOUTHNo. Description DateCity Council Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 4b) Title: DLC Apartments PUD Minor AmendmentPage 25 1A6BCDEFGHJ35425.93.41.1A.12A4.22A5.11A5.13.71A3.22A3.43A3.43A3.22A3.24A3.21A3.56' - 1"29' - 2"A7.15A7.352A5.33A5.26' - 0"10' - 10"8' - 0"4' - 0"8' - 0"3' - 4"8' - 0"6' - 8"6' - 0"4' - 0"8' - 0"2' - 4"8' - 0"5' - 0"8' - 0"2' - 8"8' - 0"9' - 10"8' - 0"2' - 8"8' - 0"5' - 0"8' - 0"3' - 8"6' - 0"4' - 0"8' - 0"11' - 4"6' - 0"326UNIT B3A(TYPE A)319UNIT B5317UNIT B4315UNIT A1313UNIT A2311UNIT A2309UNIT A1307UNIT B5305UNIT A3303UNIT A3301UNIT B6302UNIT B6304UNIT B2310UNIT A2314UNIT C1316UNIT B8322UNIT S2324UNIT B7325UNIT B11321UNIT S3ST-A-3STAIR A353STORAGE354ELECTRICAL350ELEVATORLOBBY351STORAGE352TRASH356STORAGE355NORTHCORRIDOR357SOUTHCORRIDOR5A3.54A3.53A3.52A3.52A4.31A5.31A4.3350352351354353ST-A-33563A5.4DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B128' - 8"27' - 0"25' - 8"27' - 0"27' - 4"27' - 4"27' - 0"17' - 2"2' - 0"EW6Ba3EW6Ba3EW6Ba5EW6Ba3EW6Ba1EW6Ba3EW6Ba12EW6Ba1EW6Ba3EW6Ba12EW6Ba1EW6Ba1EW6Ba32EW6Ba1EW6Ba32EW6Ba1EW6Ba5EW6Ba3EW6Ba32EW6Ba12EW6Ba3EW6Ba521A4.12A5.21A5.284' - 5 7/8"10' - 9"44' - 0"7' - 8"4' - 7"11' - 3"98' - 0"10' - 9"3' - 8 3/8"12' - 11 1/2"175' - 4"13' - 1 1/2"4' - 7"8' - 0"1' - 11 3/8"8' - 8"8' - 0"6' - 0"8' - 0"2' - 8"4' - 0"6' - 8"4' - 0"2' - 0"8' - 0"17' - 4"8' - 0"14' - 8"1' - 5 3/8"8' - 0"2' - 10"8' - 0"11 5/8"8' - 0"1' - 5 3/8"14' - 8"8' - 0"6' - 0"8' - 0"7' - 4"6' - 0"3' - 4"8' - 0"7' - 0"1' - 6"8' - 0"1' - 3"6' - 0"4' - 6 3/4"16' - 9 1/4"11' - 6"9 3/8"1' - 1"6' - 0"3"8' - 0"8' - 0"4' - 0"8' - 0"9' - 0"6' - 0"7' - 4"37' - 0"6' - 11 5/8"4' - 7"12' - 2 1/4"46' - 11 3/4"1A5.44A5.45A5.44'-3"5' - 0"8' - 0"2' - 8"8' - 0"3' - 4"8' - 0"6' - 0"8' - 0"3' - 4"6' - 0"5' - 4"8' - 0"5' - 0"8' - 0"1' - 6"6' - 0"10 1/2"4' - 5"2' - 2"8' - 0"1' - 8"0"7' - 4"6' - 0"3' - 4"8' - 0"7' - 4"8' - 0"6' - 11 3/4"2' - 10 5/8"8' - 0"2A5.44' - 1"SOUTHNORTHelness swenson graham architects500 washington avenue southminneapolis minnesota 55415p. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 5 0 8f. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 3 8 2w w w . e s g a r c h . c o mI hereby certify that this document wasprepared by me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly licensed architectunder the laws of the State of MinnesotaSignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense # DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONSKEY PLANNORTH4/4/2014 11:53:14 AMA1.3nTHIRD THRU FIFTH FLOOR -NORTH213511.00LB, MMMMMILLENNIUM at WEST ENDMINOR PUDAMENDMENTMILLENNIUM atWEST END5245 Wayzata BoulevardSt. Louis Park, MN 55416 1/8" = 1'-0"A1.3n1THIRD FLOOR PLAN SOUTH (FOURTH AND FIFTH FLOORS SIM)No. Description DateCity Council Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 4b) Title: DLC Apartments PUD Minor AmendmentPage 26 16GHJKLMPN35425.9N.93.41.13.73A5.11A3.32A3.31A3.42A3.44A3.21A4.237' - 7"8' - 0"25' - 0"18' - 3"18' - 3"41' - 2"6' - 1"29' - 2"A7.35A7.256' - 0"10' - 10"8' - 0"4' - 0"8' - 0"3' - 4"8' - 0"6' - 8"333UNIT B9331UNIT A2334UNIT B9332UNIT A1330UNIT A1328UNIT B4326UNIT B3A(TYPE A)319UNIT B5317UNIT B4316UNIT B8322UNIT S2324UNIT B7329UNIT S1327UNIT S1325UNIT B11321UNIT S3ST-B-3STAIR B350ELEVATORLOBBY351STORAGE352TRASH356STORAGE357SOUTHCORRIDOR6A3.55A3.53A3.52A3.52A4.31A5.31A4.3ST-B-3350352351356183' - 6"DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B12' - 0"25' - 8"17' - 8"28' - 2"27' - 0"27' - 4"28' - 8"27' - 0"EW6Ba1EW6Ba12EW6Ba3EW6Ba32EW6Ba12EW6Ba12EW6Ba1EW6Ba3EW6Ba3EW6Ba32EW6Ba1EW6Ba5EW6Ba3EW6Ba52EW6Ba5EW6Ba12EW6Ba32EW6Ba3EW6Ba521A4.12A4.12A5.21A5.210' - 9"26' - 0"73' - 6 1/4"17' - 0 3/8"11' - 2"42' - 8"11' - 2"10' - 9"124' - 8"3' - 8 3/8"12' - 11 1/2"8' - 0"1' - 5 3/8"16' - 0"6' - 0"4' - 0"13' - 4"8' - 0"2' - 4"8' - 0"8' - 5"8' - 0"8' - 0"8' - 0"9' - 5 1/4"1' - 2 3/4"4' - 0"2' - 10"8' - 0"11 5/8"8' - 0"1' - 5 3/8"14' - 0"8' - 0"6' - 0"8' - 0"1' - 8"8' - 0"8' - 0"8' - 0"2' - 0"8' - 0"2' - 8"8' - 0"2' - 8"8' - 0"7' - 4"6' - 0"3' - 4"8' - 0"7' - 0"1' - 6"8' - 0"1' - 3"6' - 0"4' - 6 3/4"16' - 9 1/4"11' - 6"6' - 0"4' - 8"4' - 0"2' - 8"8' - 0"4' - 0"8' - 0"2' - 8"4' - 0"4' - 8"6' - 0"12' - 2 1/4"46' - 11 3/4"4A5.45A5.44' - 7"4' - 7"4'-2"4'-3"5' - 0"8' - 0"2' - 2"8' - 0"1' - 8"7' - 4"6' - 0"3' - 4"8' - 0"7' - 4"8' - 0"6' - 11 3/4"2' - 10 5/8"8' - 0"4' - 1"6 7/8"9' - 0"6"A6.510A6.511SOUTHNORTHelness swenson graham architects500 washington avenue southminneapolis minnesota 55415p. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 5 0 8f. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 3 8 2w w w . e s g a r c h . c o mI hereby certify that this document wasprepared by me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly licensed architectunder the laws of the State of MinnesotaSignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense # DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONSKEY PLANNORTH4/4/2014 11:53:21 AMA1.3sTHIRD THRU FIFTH FLOOR -SOUTH213511.00LB, MMMMMILLENNIUM at WEST ENDMINOR PUDAMENDMENTMILLENNIUM atWEST END5245 Wayzata BoulevardSt. Louis Park, MN 55416 1/8" = 1'-0"A1.3s1THIRD FLOOR PLAN SOUTH (FOURTH AND FIFTH FLOORS SIM)No. Description DateCity Council Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 4b) Title: DLC Apartments PUD Minor AmendmentPage 27 1A6BCDEFGHJ35425.93.41.1A.12A4.22A5.11A5.13.71A3.22A3.43A3.43A3.22A3.24A3.21A3.56' - 1"29' - 2"A7.15A7.352A5.33A5.26' - 0"10' - 10"8' - 0"4' - 0"8' - 0"3' - 4"8' - 0"6' - 8"6' - 0"4' - 0"8' - 0"2' - 4"8' - 0"5' - 0"8' - 0"2' - 8"8' - 0"9' - 10"8' - 0"2' - 8"8' - 0"5' - 0"8' - 0"3' - 8"6' - 0"4' - 0"8' - 0"11' - 4"6' - 0"326UNIT B3A(TYPE A)319UNIT B5317UNIT B4315UNIT A1313UNIT A2311UNIT A2309UNIT A1307UNIT B5305UNIT A3303UNIT A3301UNIT B6302UNIT B6304UNIT B2310UNIT A2314UNIT C1316UNIT B8322UNIT S2324UNIT B7325UNIT B11321UNIT S3ST-A-3STAIR A353STORAGE354ELECTRICAL350ELEVATORLOBBY351STORAGE352TRASH356STORAGE355NORTHCORRIDOR357SOUTHCORRIDOR5A3.54A3.53A3.52A3.52A4.31A5.31A4.3350352351354353ST-A-33563A5.4DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B128' - 8"27' - 0"25' - 8"27' - 0"27' - 4"27' - 4"27' - 0"17' - 2"2' - 0"EW6Ba3EW6Ba3EW6Ba5EW6Ba3EW6Ba1EW6Ba3EW6Ba12EW6Ba1EW6Ba3EW6Ba12EW6Ba1EW6Ba1EW6Ba32EW6Ba1EW6Ba32EW6Ba1EW6Ba5EW6Ba3EW6Ba32EW6Ba12EW6Ba3EW6Ba521A4.12A5.21A5.284' - 5 7/8"10' - 9"44' - 0"7' - 8"4' - 7"11' - 3"98' - 0"10' - 9"3' - 8 3/8"12' - 11 1/2"175' - 4"13' - 1 1/2"4' - 7"8' - 0"1' - 11 3/8"8' - 8"8' - 0"6' - 0"8' - 0"2' - 8"4' - 0"6' - 8"4' - 0"2' - 0"8' - 0"17' - 4"8' - 0"14' - 8"1' - 5 3/8"8' - 0"2' - 10"8' - 0"11 5/8"8' - 0"1' - 5 3/8"14' - 8"8' - 0"6' - 0"8' - 0"7' - 4"6' - 0"3' - 4"8' - 0"7' - 0"1' - 6"8' - 0"1' - 3"6' - 0"4' - 6 3/4"16' - 9 1/4"11' - 6"9 3/8"1' - 1"6' - 0"3"8' - 0"8' - 0"4' - 0"8' - 0"9' - 0"6' - 0"7' - 4"37' - 0"6' - 11 5/8"4' - 7"12' - 2 1/4"46' - 11 3/4"1A5.44A5.45A5.44'-3"5' - 0"8' - 0"2' - 8"8' - 0"3' - 4"8' - 0"6' - 0"8' - 0"3' - 4"6' - 0"5' - 4"8' - 0"5' - 0"8' - 0"1' - 6"6' - 0"10 1/2"4' - 5"2' - 2"8' - 0"1' - 8"0"7' - 4"6' - 0"3' - 4"8' - 0"7' - 4"8' - 0"6' - 11 3/4"2' - 10 5/8"8' - 0"2A5.44' - 1"SOUTHNORTHelness swenson graham architects500 washington avenue southminneapolis minnesota 55415p. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 5 0 8f. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 3 8 2w w w . e s g a r c h . c o mI hereby certify that this document wasprepared by me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly licensed architectunder the laws of the State of MinnesotaSignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense # DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONSKEY PLANNORTH4/4/2014 11:52:23 AMA1.3nTHIRD THRU FIFTH FLOOR -NORTH213511.00LB, MMMMMILLENNIUM at WEST ENDMINOR PUDAMENDMENTMILLENNIUM atWEST END5245 Wayzata BoulevardSt. Louis Park, MN 55416 1/8" = 1'-0"A1.3n1THIRD FLOOR PLAN SOUTH (FOURTH AND FIFTH FLOORS SIM)No. Description DateCity Council Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 4b) Title: DLC Apartments PUD Minor AmendmentPage 28 REF.1A6BCDEFGHJ35425.93.41.1A.12A4.22A5.11A5.13.71A3.22A3.43A3.43A3.22A3.24A3.21A3.5A7.162A5.33A5.25A5.1EXTERIORUNITTERRACE626UNIT B3619UNIT B5617UNIT B4615UNIT A1613UNIT A2611UNIT A2609UNIT A1607UNIT B5605UNIT A3603UNIT A3604UNIT B2610UNIT A2614UNIT C1616UNIT B8658COMMUNITYROOM625UNIT B11621UNIT S3ST-A-6STAIR A653STORAGE654ELECTRICAL650ELEVATORLOBBY651UNISEX652TRASH656STORAGE655NORTHCORRIDOR657SOUTHCORRIDOR601UNIT B125A3.54A3.53A3.52A3.52A4.31A5.31A4.3656659658650651652653654ST-A-64A5.13A5.438' - 4 1/8"651AJAN650ADW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B128' - 8"27' - 0"25' - 8"27' - 0"27' - 4"27' - 4"27' - 0"17' - 2"2' - 0"EW6Ba3EW6Ba5EW6Ba3EW6Ba3EW6Ba3EW6Bb3EW6Bb3EW6Bb3EW6Ba3EW6Ba3EW6Ba5EW6Ba3EW6Ba3EW6Ba3EW6Ba3EW6Ba5EW6Ba3EW6Ba32EW6Ba32EW6Ba521A4.12A5.21A5.21A5.44A5.45A5.42A3.63A3.64A3.65A3.62A5.4A8.71659ROOF TERRACEID2.21658ABEAM BELOWA1.5s3A1.5n22521' - 8"27' - 6 5/8"2' - 3 1/4"2' - 8"SOUTHNORTHelness swenson graham architects500 washington avenue southminneapolis minnesota 55415p. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 5 0 8f. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 3 8 2w w w . e s g a r c h . c o mI hereby certify that this document wasprepared by me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly licensed architectunder the laws of the State of MinnesotaSignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense # DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONSKEY PLANNORTH4/4/2014 12:02:20 PMA1.4nSIXTH FLOOR - NORTH213511.00LB, MMMMMILLENNIUM at WEST ENDMINOR PUDAMENDMENTMILLENNIUM atWEST END5245 Wayzata BoulevardSt. Louis Park, MN 55416 1/8" = 1'-0"A1.4n1SIXTH FLOOR PLAN NORTHNo. Description DateCity Council Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 4b) Title: DLC Apartments PUD Minor AmendmentPage 29 REF.16GHJKLMPN35425.9N.93.41.13.73A5.13A3.11A3.32A3.31A3.42A3.44A3.21A4.28' - 0"A7.2625' - 0"36' - 6"41' - 2"633UNIT A4631UNIT A2634UNIT A4632UNIT A1630UNIT A1628UNIT B4626UNIT B3619UNIT B5617UNIT B4616UNIT B8658COMMUNITYROOM629UNIT B1625UNIT B11621UNIT S3ST-B-6STAIR B650ELEVATORLOBBY651UNISEX652TRASH656STORAGE657SOUTHCORRIDOR6A3.55A3.53A3.52A3.52A4.31A5.31A4.3656659ST-B-6ST-B-6A65865065165225' - 10 3/4"23' - 4"23' - 4"36' - 0"38' - 4 1/8"9' - 5"651AJAN650ADW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B1DW82B12' - 0"25' - 8"17' - 8"28' - 2"27' - 0"27' - 4"28' - 8"27' - 0"EW6Ba3EW6Ba5EW6Ba3EW6Ba3EW6Ba3EW6Ba3EW6Ba5EW6Ba5EW6Ba5EW6Ba3EW6Ba52EW6Ba5EW6Ba5EW6Ba521A4.12A4.12A5.21A5.24A5.45A5.46' - 0"1' - 1"8' - 0"5' - 1"3' - 0"8' - 4"3' - 0"5' - 1"8' - 0"1' - 1"6' - 0"5' - 2"6' - 0"17' - 4"8' - 0"2' - 4"8' - 0"2' - 10"8' - 0"6' - 10"8' - 0"2' - 10"8' - 0"5' - 5"1A3.64A3.65A3.6A8.71659ROOF TERRACEID2.216A6.6658AEXTERIOR UNITTERRACEEXTERIOR UNITTERRACEA1.5s3A1.5s22521' - 8"27' - 6 5/8"2' - 3 1/4"2' - 8"SOUTHNORTHelness swenson graham architects500 washington avenue southminneapolis minnesota 55415p. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 5 0 8f. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 3 8 2w w w . e s g a r c h . c o mI hereby certify that this document wasprepared by me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly licensed architectunder the laws of the State of MinnesotaSignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense # DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONSKEY PLANNORTH4/4/2014 12:02:24 PMA1.4sSIXTH FLOOR - SOUTH213511.00LB, MMMMMILLENNIUM at WEST ENDMINOR PUDAMENDMENTMILLENNIUM atWEST END5245 Wayzata BoulevardSt. Louis Park, MN 55416 1/8" = 1'-0"A1.4s1SIXTH FLOOR SOUTHNo. Description DateCity Council Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 4b) Title: DLC Apartments PUD Minor AmendmentPage 30 1A6BCDEFGHJ35425.93.41.1A.13.7PROVIDE WALKWAY PADS ASREQUIRED FOR COMPLETEACCESS AND SERVICE OFMECHANICAL EQUIPMENTROOF TOP UNIT-SEE MECHRDORDRDORDRDORDRDORDRDORDRDORD2' - 0"15' - 8"27' - 8"11' - 8"6' - 4"10' - 6"27' - 2"17' - 0"2' - 0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"12' - 0"12' - 0"4' - 0"4' - 0"5' - 0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"10' - 7"A1.5s428' - 8"27' - 0"25' - 8"27' - 0"27' - 4"27' - 4"27' - 0"17' - 2"2' - 0"A6BC55.9A.11/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/8" / 1'-0"1/8" / 1'-0"1/8" / 1'-0"1/8" / 1'-0"2" / 1'-0"SOUTHNORTHelness swenson graham architects500 washington avenue southminneapolis minnesota 55415p. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 5 0 8f. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 3 8 2w w w . e s g a r c h . c o mI hereby certify that this document wasprepared by me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly licensed architectunder the laws of the State of MinnesotaSignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense # DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONSKEY PLANNORTH4/4/2014 12:02:26 PMA1.5nROOF PLAN - NORTH213511.00LB, MMMMMILLENNIUM at WEST ENDMINOR PUDAMENDMENTMILLENNIUM atWEST END5245 Wayzata BoulevardSt. Louis Park, MN 55416 1/8" = 1'-0"A1.5n1ROOF PLAN NORTH 1/4" = 1'-0"A1.5n2ENLARGED ROOF PLAN AT SIXTH FLOOR NORTH TERRACENo. Description DateCity Council Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 4b) Title: DLC Apartments PUD Minor AmendmentPage 31 16GHJKLMPN35425.9N.93.41.13.73'-0" x 6'-0"ROOF HATCHROOF TOP UNIT-SEE MECHRDORDRDORDRDORDRDORDRDORD1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"5' - 0"4' - 0"12' - 0"13' - 0"10' - 7"A1.5s428' - 8"27' - 0"2' - 0"25' - 8"17' - 8"28' - 2"27' - 0"27' - 4"6GH545.91/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"PLANTER AREA6P545.9N.93.43.71/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/8" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/8" / 1'-0"6GH545.9elness swenson graham architects500 washington avenue southminneapolis minnesota 55415p. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 5 0 8f. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 3 8 2w w w . e s g a r c h . c o mI hereby certify that this document wasprepared by me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly licensed architectunder the laws of the State of MinnesotaSignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense # DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS4/4/2014 12:02:28 PMA1.5sROOF PLAN - SOUTH213511.00AuthorCheckerMILLENNIUM at WEST ENDMINOR PUDAMENDMENTMILLENNIUM atWEST END5245 Wayzata BoulevardSt. Louis Park, MN 55416No. Description Date 1/8" = 1'-0"A1.5s1ROOF PLAN SOUTH 1/4" = 1'-0"A1.5s3ENLARGED ROOF PLAN AT SIXTH FLOOR COMMUNITY ROOM TERRACE 1/4" = 1'-0"A1.5s2ENLARGED ROOF PLAN AT SIXTH FLOORSOUTH TERRACE 1/4" = 1'-0"A1.5s4ENLARGED ROOF PLAN AT SIXTH FLOOR COMMUNITY ROOM TRELLISCity Council Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 4b) Title: DLC Apartments PUD Minor AmendmentPage 32 Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 21, 2014 Consent Agenda Item: 4c TITLE: Southwest LRT Corridor Investment Framework RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution accepting the contents and recommendations of the Southwest Corridor Investment Framework pertaining to St. Louis Park. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Are the Southwest Corridor Investment Framework plans for SW LRT station areas pertaining to St. Louis Park acceptable for use in future planning? SUMMARY: Over the past two years much work has been completed in station area planning along the SW LRT line. A culmination of much of the work was in the planning known as the Southwest Corridor Investment Framework or TSAAP plans. There is a plan for each station area that can be accessed on the city’s web site at: http://www.stlouispark.org/light-freight- rail/station-area-planning.html. The City Council received an overview of the plans at its March 24 Study Session. The Transitional Station Area Action Plan (TSAAP) process was intended to “promote opening day readiness in 2018 by bridging the gap between current conditions and future needs by identifying and prioritizing infrastructure improvements that enhance existing business, support mixed-income housing opportunities, and encourage new development.” The plans identify specific street, trail, sidewalk and other public improvements that are needed in the station areas. It also provides prioritization of these improvements for the “opening day” of the transit. The intent is that these improvements will facilitate access and usage of the station area as well as providing development opportunities. This year and in the coming years the public improvements included in this plan document will be incorporated into our Capital Improvements Plan to be pursued with funding from a variety of city, other agency and grant sources. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The Southwest Corridor Investment Framework and TSAAP plans were funded primarily through a HUD Sustainable Communities grant and with additional funds from Hennepin County. VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged community. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution See documents at http://www.stlouispark.org/light-freight- rail/station-area-planning.html Prepared by: Meg J. McMonigal, Planning and Zoning Supervisor Reviewed by: Michele Schnitker, Housing Supervisor Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 4c) Page 2 Title: Southwest LRT Corridor Investment Framework RESOLUTION NO. 14-___ A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR INVESTMENT FRAMEWORK AND TRANSITIONAL STATION AREA ACTION PLANS (TSAAP) IN THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK WHEREAS, the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners adopted Resolution No. 09-0596 in 2009 establishing the Southwest LRT Community Works program in consultation with the cities of Eden Prairie, Edina, Minnetonka, Hopkins, St. Louis Park, and Minneapolis, and other Southwest LRT partners, and WHEREAS, the Southwest LRT Community Works Steering Committee, comprised of Southwest LRT Community Works partners from cities and other agencies along the Southwest corridor, was formed in 2010 to provide overall guidance and direction for the Southwest LRT Community Works Project, and WHEREAS, Southwest LRT Community Works goals include stimulating economic development, building bridges for effective planning and implementation, maintaining and improving natural systems, strengthening communities through connections and enhancing the tax base, and WHEREAS, a key activity of the Southwest LRT Community Works program is collaborative work on station area planning activities and preparation of a corridor-wide framework for on-going investment, and WHEREAS, in late 2012, Hennepin County, in consultation with city partners, contracted with Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. (HKGi) on behalf of the Southwest Community Works Steering Committee to conduct transitional station area action planning activities, funded through a grant from Corridors of Opportunity/HUD as well as funds from Hennepin County, resulting in the Southwest Corridor Investment Framework, and WHEREAS, the Southwest Corridor Investment Framework will guide activities of the Southwest LRT Community Works partners to prepare areas around proposed stations for transit oriented development, access improvements, and other efforts to support the Southwest LRT project, and WHEREAS, the Southwest LRT Community Works Steering Committee accepted the Southwest Corridor Investment Framework as a document to guide ongoing collaborative activities by partner agencies in achieving Southwest LRT Community Works goals, and WHEREAS, the Southwest LRT Community Works Steering Committee referred the Southwest Corridor Investment Framework to member cities and partner organizations for individual action(s) as deemed appropriate, and WHEREAS, the consulting group preparing the Southwest Corridor Investment Framework, HKGi presented the plans to the St. Louis Park City Council on March 24, 2014 and the St. Louis Park Planning Commission on April 2, 2014, and City Council Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 4c) Page 3 Title: Southwest LRT Corridor Investment Framework WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park will utilize the Southwest Corridor Investment Framework to guide implementation of the various public through the city’s long range planning and capital improvement programing. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City of St. Louis Park hereby accepts the contents and recommendations of the Southwest Investment Framework pertaining to St. Louis Park. Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council April 21, 2014 City Manager Mayor Attest: City Clerk Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 21, 2014 Consent Agenda Item: 4d EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Traffic Study No. 644: Authorize Installing Restricted Parking - Loading Zone On Webster Avenue RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution authorizing installation of restricted parking - loading zone on Webster Avenue, just north of 36th Street. POLICY CONSIDERATION: The restriction is allowed per the City’s established regulatory authority. SUMMARY: The City has received input from the public and the St. Louis Park Police Department that delivery trucks are double parking on 36th Street and occupying the outermost lane of westbound traffic. This practice creates a safety hazard for both the delivery driver and the traveling public. The businesses within Hoigaard Village rely upon these delivery trucks to deliver goods. However, it is important to provide a safe environment for both the delivery truck driver as well as the motorists traveling on westbound 36th Street. Delivery truck parking on 36th Street, Xenwood Avenue, and Webster Avenue is currently difficult as parking spaces are often occupied by customers and residents. The Traffic Committee discussed the issue and recommends parking restrictions to improve safety conditions. Since it is not possible to provide additional parking along 36th Street, accommodations were evaluated for Webster Avenue. A “Loading Zone” is proposed on the west side of Webster Avenue beginning at 36th Street and extending 80 feet to the north. The proposed change is to install signage which will designate one parking stall as a loading zone. The attached figure depicts the proposed changes. A letter has been sent to the business and residents notifying them of the staff’s parking restriction recommendation and have asked for any final comments prior to the April 21st Council Meeting. The majority of the comments received have been positive. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The cost of enacting these controls is minimal and will come out of the general operating budget. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution Traffic Study #644 Prepared by: Jake Bongard, Traffic Engineer Reviewed by: Debra Heiser, Engineering Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 4d) Page 2 Title: Traffic Study No. 644: Authorize Installing Restricted Parking - Loading Zone On Webster Avenue RESOLUTION NO. 14-___ RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING INSTALLATION OF “NO PARKING - LOADING ZONE” RESTRICTIONS ON THE WEST SIDE OF WEBSTER AVENUE FROM 36TH STREET TO A POINT 80 FEET TO THE NORTH TRAFFIC STUDY NO. 644 WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota has been requested, has studied, and has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to install parking restrictions at this location. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, that: 1. The Engineering Director is hereby authorized to install “No Parking – Loading Zone” restrictions on the west side of Webster Avenue from 36th Street to a point approximately 80 feet to the north. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council April 21, 2014 City Manager Mayor Attest: City Clerk City Council Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 4d) Page 3 Title: Traffic Study No. 644: Authorize Installing Restricted Parking - Loading Zone On Webster Avenue TRAFFIC STUDY NO. 644 WEBSTER AVENUE FIGURE (NO PARKING – LOADING ZONE) TRUCKS UNLOADING DOUBLE PARK AND BLOCK WESTBOUND LANE OF TRAFFIC PROPOSED NO-PARKING- LOADING ZONE Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 21, 2014 Consent Agenda Item: 4e EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Traffic Study No. 645: Authorize Installation of Stop Signs on Oregon Avenue at 29th Street RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution authorizing installation of stop signs on Oregon Avenue at 29th Street. POLICY CONSIDERATION: The restriction is allowed per the City’s established regulatory authority. SUMMARY: The City has received a request to evaluate the existing uncontrolled intersection of 29th Street and Oregon Avenue. The City’s Traffic Control Policy guides the installation of stop signs. Past experience has demonstrated that placing stop signs in unwarranted locations can potentially cause an intersection to be even less safe. The policy sets out warrants which an intersection must meet in order to have stop signs installed. The warrants for volume, accident history and intersection geometry were not met for this site. However, upon review of the sight lines, we determined that there is limited visibility at this intersection due to the hill on 29th Street. The Traffic Committee is recommending that the City install stop signs on the north and south approaches of the intersection. The limited visibility caused by the steep hill to the east creates a safety concern that is improved by installing traffic control to better define vehicle right-of-way for all approaches of the intersection. A letter has been sent to the residents of within 600 feet of the recommended intersection control asking for final comments prior to the April 21 Council Meeting. The comments received have been positive. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The cost of enacting these controls is minimal and will come out of the general operating budget. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution Traffic Study #645 Prepared by: Jake Bongard, Traffic Engineer Reviewed by: Debra Heiser, Engineering Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 4e) Page 2 Title: Traffic Study No. 645: Authorize Installation of Stop Signs on Oregon Avenue at 29th Street RESOLUTION NO. 14-___ RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING INSTALLATION OF STOP SIGNS ON OREGON AVENUE AT 29TH STREET TRAFFIC STUDY NO. 645 WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota has been requested, has studied, and has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to install a 2 way stop sign on Oregon Avenue at 29th Street. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, that: 1. The Engineering Director is hereby authorized to install stop signs on Oregon Avenue at 29th Street (north and south-bound approaches). Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council April 21, 2014 City Manager Mayor Attest: City Clerk City Council Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 4e) Page 3 Title: Traffic Study No. 645: Authorize Installation of Stop Signs on Oregon Avenue at 29th Street TRAFFIC STUDY NO. 645 Installation of Stop Signs on Oregon Avenue at 29th Street The intersection of 29th Street at Oregon Avenue was evaluated to determine whether additional traffic control is necessary to improve driver safety. The intersection is currently uncontrolled. Eastbound and westbound stop signs are not evaluated as the steep grades on the westbound approach would make gaining traction and proceeding through the intersection after coming to a complete stop difficult during the winter months. The focus of this evaluation is to determine whether stop signs installed on the north and south legs of the intersection would provide a benefit. Crash history indicates that existing traffic control has been effective over the past three years, but discussions with residents reveal that many of the accidents at the intersection are not reported to the police. Primary concerns stem from westbound 29th Street traffic being unable to see vehicles crossing or entering the roadway from Oregon Avenue. With the intersection being uncontrolled, southbound vehicles have the right-of-way to enter the intersection with westbound 29th Street traffic yielding to their movement. This is currently not happening as westbound traffic often cannot see vehicles entering from Oregon Street from a distance great enough to come to a complete stop. Images of the westbound and southbound approaches are shown below. 29th Street – Westbound Oregon Avenue - Southbound (Approaching the intersection) (Approaching the intersection) A sight distance evaluation was performed at the intersection of 29th Street at Oregon Avenue to determine whether adequate sight distance is currently available. Sight distance is classified as the length of roadway ahead that is visible to the driver. Stopping sight distance and intersection sight distance are evaluated to determine whether adequate distances are present under existing conditions. Formulas for stopping sight distance and intersection sight distance are attained from the AASHTO Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. Stopping Sight Distance Stopping sight distance is the sum of the distance covered as a driver recognizes a condition that requires a stop and pushes the brakes (Driver Perception) to when a vehicle reaches a complete stop (Braking Distance). The braking distance is modified for slopes greater than 3% as stopping distance is reduce on upgrades and extended for downgrades. The westbound approach, shown above, displays an average upgrade of approximately 13%. Using this value, the stopping sight distance for the westbound approach is calculated to be approximately 175 feet. The variance between the distances required for level grade and what is present is provided below. City Council Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 4e) Page 4 Title: Traffic Study No. 645: Authorize Installation of Stop Signs on Oregon Avenue at 29th Street A sight distance evaluation performed at the intersection revealed that the existing stopping sight distance for the westbound approach is approximately 150 feet. Intersection Sight Distance Intersection sight distance focuses on the necessity to provide adequate sight triangles to vehicles entering the intersection from conflicting approaches. The previously mentioned AASHTO Guide Book requires that vehicles approaching the intersection from conflicting legs can see each other when 140 feet from the edge of the intersection for a 30 mph speed limit. This condition is not met as the westbound 29th Street approach lacks adequate sight lines with Oregon Avenue due to steep grades and visual impairments such as retaining walls, trees, and houses located near the intersection. Recommendations The stopping sight distance observed in the field (150 feet) is less than that recommended (175 feet) within the AASHTO Guide Book. Therefore it is recommended that stop signs be installed on the north and south legs of the intersection. This will assign right-of-way to the eastbound and westbound movements and provide clarity to motorists of which approaches should stop/yield to conflicting movements. While the conditions present at the intersection will still not be ideal, it is an improvement that can be made without modifying the profile of either roadway. Condition Speed Limit Driver Perception Braking Distance Calculated SSD Assumed SSD Stopping Sight Distance (Level)30 111'87'198'200' Stopping Sight Distance (≈13% Upgrade)30 111'63'174'175' Stopping Sight Distance Evaluation Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 21, 2014 Consent Agenda Item: 4f OFFICIAL MINUTES Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission February 19, 2014, 6:30 p.m. Meeting The Rec Center Programming Office 1. Call to Order Jim Beneke, Chair, called the meeting to order at 6:29 p.m. Commission members present: Jim Beneke, Sarah Foulkes, Elizabeth Griffin, George Hagemann, and Tom Worthington. Commission members absent: George Foulkes and Kirk Hawkinson. Staff present: Rick Beane, Park Superintendent, Jason West, Recreation Superintendent, and Stacy Voelker, Recording Secretary. Guests Present: Joan Monicatti, President Lacrosse Association, Kevin Reed, Lacrosse Association, Tonia Kurth, Health in the Park 2. Presentations a. St. Louis Park Lacrosse Association (Kevin Reed) Introductions were made between Mr. Reed and the Commission members. Mr. Reed distributed an overview of the association to members. Mr. Reed advised he founded the Association in 2006 when Lacrosse was a new sport. Lacrosse is the quickest growing sport in America currently with Minnesota leading the way nationally. Currently, Joan Monicatti is President of the Association and Mr. Reed holds no position at this time. The history, timeline and teams of the Association were reviewed. Initially there were 42 participants which has grown to approximately 190 in 2014. Last year the Association branched out to girls and also added 3rd and 4th grade boy teams. This year, in 2014, they will add 1st and 2nd grade boy teams. Mr. Reed anticipates there will be ten teams in 2014, eight boys’ teams and two girls’ teams. The average team size is 15 to 25 team members. Mr. Reed advised they utilize Ainsworth Park, the High School Stadium, and the Middle School for their leagues. Mr. Reed complimented their partners which include the city, Community Education, the High School and Eisenhower Elementary. High School participants volunteer at the STEP program in exchange for gym space at Eisenhower Elementary. Members reviewed the association budget of approximately $60,000 annually of which $12,000 is fundraised. In 2014, the association received a Hennepin County Youth Sports Grant which was applied for in partnership with the city. Mr. Reed thanked the Recreation Department for their partnership and is very excited their Association is City Council Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 4f) Page 2 Title: Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission Minutes of February 19, 2014 recognized by Hennepin County. Mr. Hagemann inquired on the cost to play and if scholarships are offered. High School participants can expect to pay $450 which includes some traveling tournaments, Mr. Reed advised, and the fee for youth is approximately $200 - $250. Scholarships are offered as no one is turned away. Andrew Peshon, individual with the Association, reviews all scholarship applications submitted. Scholarships are included in their budget. Mr. Reed discussed the current coaching staff and commented all are former St. Louis Park players. Mr. Worthington inquired on the coaches to which Mr. Reed indicated Arianna Gavzy are coordinating the coaches which include two St. Louis Park senior’s and Molly Dionne from Hopkins are coaches. The girl’s lacrosse leagues have all girls coaching staff. There is not a lot of parent participation, Ms. Monicetti advised, so Ari organizes it all from a volunteer status. The association’s future focus includes expanding the diversity to reflect the community, create more opportunity for females in the sport, involve high school players in community service programming, continue to provide residents with affordable programs, build opportunities with Recreation Department, encourage high school players to attend college and join the MSHSL in 2015. Also in 2015 they will join the St. Louis Park School District as a high school sport. This creates a great partnership with the School District. The main challenge for the Association is field space, indicated Mr. Reed. Associations compete for the space which is more challenging as their participation numbers continue to grow. They want to ensure everyone can play without turning anyone away so they are looking forward to a working relationship with the city regarding field space. Mr. Beneke inquired how the school league will be run. The school district will take over the high school league, Mr. Reed advised, but the association will be involved in the transition. Mr. Worthington commented that field space is challenging. Mr. Reed advised the association is talking with the Recreation Department to figure out how to accommodate all sports on the fields. Mr. Worthington is curious if participants are joining lacrosse and leaving other sports. As kids get older, they do change sports but unsure of the statistics, Mr. Worthington commented. Mr. Reed mentioned lacrosse, the sport, does utilize the fields aggressively. Mr. Monicatti indicated they worked with Community Education when the stadium opened and will continue to do so. Mr. West applauded Ms. Monicatti and Mr. Reed on their efforts and advised they are great to work with. Kristin Piper, field coordinator, was also complimented. Commission members, Ms. Monicatti and Mr. Reed shared appreciation for the visit. b. Health in the Park (Tonia Kurth) Introductions were made between Tonia Kurth and the Commission members. Ms. Kurth explained she is working with Bridget Gothberg, the city’s Organization Developmental City Council Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 4f) Page 3 Title: Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission Minutes of February 19, 2014 Coordinator. Ms. Kurth advised the first meeting hosted by HIP will be held Thursday, February 20 beginning at 6:30 p.m. at the Marriot West Hotel. HIP focuses on why we live, work and play in the city and focuses on a healthy community. Informational folders were distributed to the Commission. Funding is provided by the Center for Prevention at Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota. The organization has met with over 500 individuals in the community with a broad culture range. They asked participants what goals they have for themselves, what are the obstacles they face to reach those goals and how, as a community, can strategies be created to create a change. They reviewed the goals, obstacles, and strategies of which Blue Cross Blue Shield will assist. Ms. Kurth explained Phase 1 is talking with people through focus groups, presentations, and creating communications for awareness. A documentary is being created around St. Louis Park on how the community is coming together to reach goals. The documentary will be a model to show other communities in Minnesota in hopes they duplicate the effort. Blue Cross Blue Shield’s goal is to make Minnesota a healthier community as a whole. The meeting at that Marriot will discuss the data that was gathered, and review barrier’s and discuss what can be done to achieve goals, indicated Ms. Kurth. Top priorities will be discussed and how to create strategies to address the priorities. The meeting on March 2 will focus more on actions to achieve goals. Phase II of the process, Ms. Kurth indicated, would be to put forth the information gathered from Phase I. The results would be present and conversations will take place in various groups, allowing the sharing of resources. The data gathered is broad but there are also some key items that are coming through. The group hopes the community will take on a lot of the key items seen. Ms. Kurth advised it is a matter of holistic well-being. Ms. Kurth suggested the Commission get involved by attending the meetings and bring people to the March 2 meeting. Social media connections were reviewed and members asked to connect with people to provide positive encouragement for involvement. Mr. West suggested Commission members introduce themselves as part of the Commission if they attend the meetings. Mr. Worthington inquired in the partners of the initiative. Ms. Kurth indicated it is the City, Blue Cross Blue Shield, Park Nicollet and others. Ms. Griffin asked if mental health is one of the goal areas. Ms. Kurth indicated that is a huge topic that has been presented among the various cultural groups. Mr. Worthington inquired if metrics are in place to see where the initiative began and where it goes. Researchers are on staff, advised Ms. Kurth, that have that data and a process in in place to track the information. City Council Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 4f) Page 4 Title: Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission Minutes of February 19, 2014 Commission members and Ms. Kurth shared appreciation for the visit. 3. Approval of Minutes a. January 15, 2014 Mr. Hagemann requested the following changes to the minutes: • Page two, item 1b, second paragraph change first sentence to read “…walk/trail/bikeway use a grass boulevard as a buffer, which is between five…” • Page 3, item 1b, last paragraph, fourth sentence, to read “…the city compromised so there would be on-road bike lanes.” • Page 3, item 1b, last paragraph, fifth sentence, to read “…stepped up to fight for designated bike lanes on bridges.” • Page 6, item 6, first paragraph, second sentence correct spelling of word “Assistant”. It was moved by Commission member Griffin to approve the minutes with changes presented. The motion passed 5 – 0. 4. Old Business a. Approve 2014 Goals Mr. Worthington suggested acquiring participation numbers from the associations. Ms. Griffin suggested obtaining participation numbers from the High School sports. Members discussed and agreed that would be helpful. Mr. Hagemann would be interested in find out about new programs or if participation numbers are due to new initiatives. Mr. West indicated staff will send an inquiry asking for information. It was moved by Commission member Hagemann to approve the 2014 Goals are presented. The motion passed 5 – 0. 5. New Business a. 2014 Capital Improvement Projects (Rick Beane) Mr. Beane reviewed the Capital Improvement Projects for 2014 which include: • Replacing woodchips around playground in parks which is an annual project. • Renovating the dugout, storage/concession building at Cedar Knoll Park. • Dakota Park baseball field (Derrick Keller field) renovation which will cause rift with field usage and space. The field will be out of commission July 4 through April, 2015. • Seal coating the parking lot at Oak Hill Park, Louisiana Oaks Park, and The Rec Center. In 2015, Mr. Beane indicated, it is proposed to expand other parking North lot in Louisiana Oaks Park in 2015 City Council Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 4f) Page 5 Title: Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission Minutes of February 19, 2014 • Playgrounds are scheduled to be replacement at Dakota and Louisiana Oaks Parks. Staff sent out Request for Proposals (“RFP”) and typically have seven designers that respond. When the RFP’s are received, staff will chose designers and hold a public meeting for residents to vote on the specific playground equipment they would like in the parks. Mr. West advised St. Louis Park has a very unique process asking for the residents to choose the equipment. • Staff would like to consolidate storage for the Recreation Departments equipment. Staff is looking at the possibility of moving existing storage items from Parkview building. This building was very busy during rinks. Moving the storage will allow us to create a larger area in the warming house for skaters (as it was many years ago). • The asphalt trail around Lamplighter pond will be renovated which could include repaving the entire trail. Staff is working with Public Works on the project. • Wolfe Lake Cattail Pond will be re-landscaped along with paver and retaining wall renovation at the Amphitheater. Staff is viewing decorative concrete versus pavers due to the ease in maintaining. • Projects to be completed at the Rec Center in 2014 include roof repair, remodeling of the men’s locker room, painting the west arena and commons area, and remodeling the west arena lockers and bathroom. • The deck chairs at the Aquatic Park will be replaced, the pool will be resurfaced, along with the waterslide and mechanical updates will occur at the Aquatic Park. Ms. Foulkes advised Golden Valley and St. Louis Park soccer has merged. She inquired if there are options in Golden Valley for field usage. Mr. West advised Golden Valley is renovating a lot of fields this year also. Mr. Beneke inquired if Parkview Park is all on city property or partially on school district property. Mr. Beane advised he will research and Ms. Voelker will send information onto members. UPDATE: The playground at Parkview Park is on city property; the building, ice rink, etc. are all on school property. b. Park Shelter Building Remote Entry Update (Rick Beane) Mr. Beane advised the Commission remote entry and Wi-Fi will be added to three park shelter buildings in 2014. The buildings are located in Browndale, Fern Hill and Nelson Parks and hope to have them operational late June. Members discussed vandalism but Mr. Beane indicated there may be some at first but other cities advised it may decrease as it did in the cities surveyed. Staff can monitor the buildings any time through cameras. If the building is entered after the hours specified by staff, an alert email will be sent to select staff. If this works well at the three buildings, Mr. Beane indicated may include at other facilities. 6. Staff Communication Mr. Beane advised currently there are voluntary on-street parking restrictions to odd side of street but this will become mandatory beginning Friday. Staff will install signs on affected streets and communicate via media. The reason it will be mandatory as City Council Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 4f) Page 6 Title: Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission Minutes of February 19, 2014 emergency vehicles are struggling to get down streets due to the large amount of snow. Updates will be posted on the city’s website and Facebook. The weather has been nice so the outdoor ice rink season was extended by a week, Mr. Beane indicated. Adult broomball ends Monday which will be the last day of rinks also. Staff that generally maintains the outdoor rinks will finish building the cabinets to be installed in the house at the Nature Center, advised Mr. Beane. The tree crew is at the Nature Center clearing from past storms and removing diseased Elm trees. Staff is also repairing/painting all picnic tables. These are maintenance items they do when not plowing snow. Mr. Beane advised the city worked out an agreement with Park Assembly Church by the Junior High School on Texas Avenue to utilize some of their property as a lacrosse field. The field was built but the storm in June delayed the project. Good seed growth is anticipated by June of 2014. Mr. West informed the Commission staff has had discussions with the Hockey Association to create an outdoor ice rink. A request for proposal (“RFP”) was sent out to conduct a feasibility study. The Hockey Association provided funding for the study. The RFP was sent out to six agencies. Mr. West notified members the city, along with Twin West Chamber of Commerce, is organizing a State of the City event to be held at the Rec Center. This event brings business owners together to hear from representative from the city. The event will be held Thursday, March 7 from 7:30 a.m. – 9 a.m. and is titled St. Louis Park on Ice. Mr. West indicated all members are welcome to attend. Mr. West will present at the Real Estate Forum on March 12. He will talk about park improvements, amenities and various programs. One hundred realtors are anticipated to be in attendance. 7. Member Communication Ms. Foulkes mentioned the Lacrosse Association also offered a development league. The league was a great opportunity for new participants to try lacrosse. Mr. Reed made it very fun and the kids had a blast. Mr. Hagemann advised the Friends of the Arts has a new executive director, Jamie Meyer, which is a paid position. It was suggested to invite Mr. Meyer to a future meeting, perhaps in May. Mr. Hagemann complimented the staff that plows for doing a great job clearing the trails. Mr. Beane will pass along the compliment to staff. City Council Meeting of April 21, 2014 (Item No. 4f) Page 7 Title: Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission Minutes of February 19, 2014 Mr. Beane advised the city worked with Three Rivers Park District last year and monitored trails and usage. Three Rivers provided some funding to St. Louis Park for maintaining the trails. Mr. Worthington inquired on an update for the France and 40th area. Mr. Beane advised Ms. Walsh is overseeing that topic and can update at a future meeting. 8. Other / Future Agenda Items None. 9. Adjournment It was moved by Commission member Worthington to adjourn at 7:58 p.m. The motion passed 5 – 0. Respectfully submitted, Stacy Voelker Stacy Voelker Administrative Secretary