Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015/02/09 - ADMIN - Agenda Packets - City Council - Study SessionAGENDA FEBRUARY 9, 2015 (Councilmember Hallfin Out) 6:30 p.m. CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION – Community Room Discussion Items 1. 6:30 p.m. Future Study Session Agenda Planning – February 23, 2015 2. 6:35 p.m. Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) Noise Report 3. 7:05 p.m. Fiber and Broadband Update 4. 7:50 p.m. Small Cell Antenna Applications 5. 8:20 p.m. Check-in on Results of City Council Workshop 8:50 p.m. Communications/Meeting Check-In (Verbal) 8:55 p.m. Adjourn Written Reports 6. Proposed Allocation of 2015 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds 7. 2015 Traffic Signal Installation Update-Elmwood Neighborhood 8. Comprehensive Plan Amendments Related to Planned Unit Developments 9. Annual Open to Business Program Update Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. To make arrangements, please call the Administration Department at 952/924-2525 (TDD 952/924-2518) at least 96 hours in advance of meeting. Meeting: Study Session Meeting Date: February 9, 2015 Discussion Item: 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Future Study Session Agenda Planning – February 17 and 23, 2015 RECOMMENDED ACTION: The City Council and the City Manager to set the agenda for a Special Study Session on February 17 and the regularly scheduled Study Session on February 23, 2015. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the Council agree with the agendas as proposed? SUMMARY: At each study session approximately five minutes are set aside to discuss the next study session agenda. For this purpose, attached please find the proposed discussion items for the Special Study Session on February 17 and the regularly scheduled Study Session on February 23, 2015. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Future Study Session Agenda Planning February 17 and 23, 2015 Prepared by: Debbie Fischer, Office Assistant Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Study Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 1) Page 2 Title: Future Study Session Agenda Planning – February 17 and 23, 2015 Special Study Session, February 17, 2015 – 7:00 p.m. Tentative Discussion Items 1. Pilot Program – Body Cameras – Police Department (45 minutes) Chief Luse and City Attorney Tom Scott will be in attendance to discuss the implementation of body cameras on a pilot basis and related policy issues. Study Session, February 23, 2015 – 6:30 p.m. Tentative Discussion Items 1. Future Study Session Agenda Planning – Administrative Services (5 minutes) 2. Reilly Update – Operations & Recreation (45 minutes) Staff will be providing a brief historical overview of the Reilly site followed by a status report on current efforts to reduce the City’s obligations under the Consent Decree. 3. Emergency Operations Plan – Fire (45 minutes) Staff desires to review with Council the updated Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) and a refresher on the duties and responsibilities of elected officials in the event of a significant community disaster or major incident. This is the first update of the EOP since 2005. 4. Update on Park Nicollet Pilot Program – Fire (30 minutes) The Fire Chief will share the latest data being gleaned by the home visits being conducted in partnership with Park Nicollet under this Pilot Program. In addition, staff will discuss the current status of the pilot and next steps including current legislative actions. 5. 2015 Connect the Park! Projects – Engineering (30 minutes) Staff will provide Council with an overview of the sidewalks and trails proposed for construction in 2015. 6. Recycling Efforts and Goals – Operations & Recreation (30 minutes) Staff will review current efforts and possible strategies to increase recycling and discuss other program goals. Communications/Meeting Check-In – Administrative Services (5 minutes) Time for communications between staff and Council will be set aside on every study session agenda for the purposes of information sharing. End of Meeting: 9:40 p.m. Reports 7. Housing Activity Report 8. Aquila/Blake Road Corridor Study Meeting: Study Session Meeting Date: February 9, 2015 Discussion Item: 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) Noise Report RECOMMENDED ACTION: None requested - informational presentation only. POLICY CONSIDERATION: None at this time. SUMMARY: The MAC’s Noise Oversight Committee (NOC) consists of six representatives from the airline industry, five representatives from cities bordering the airport, and one representative selected from the at-large cities. St. Louis Park is part of the seven city at-large group and has been involved since the NOC was formed in 2002. The committee works closely with MAC staff in cooperative efforts to reduce aircraft noise impacts associated with MSP and offers recommendations to the MAC Commissioners. During 2013, FAA discussion of possible future changes in runway management with implementation of RNAV began raising questions of how aircraft noise would impact certain areas, primarily in cities located northwest of the airport. A draft piece of legislation during the 2014 session for added noise monitoring resulted in MAC developing a Noise Monitoring Study. Temporary noise monitoring equipment was placed in Edina and St. Louis Park during August/September to establish a baseline for aircraft noise. A series of thirty-nine fixed noise monitoring stations are positioned around MSP. The nearest location to St. Louis Park is in Minneapolis near the south side of Lake Calhoun. Aircraft arriving MSP on the parallel runways 12R and 12L align for approach near the center of St. Louis Park. As a result, the southeast quadrant of the city receives the highest frequency of direct overhead flights in a narrow area. The Rec Center was selected as a secure site to place the data collection equipment and represents the surrounding residential area. Lisa Peilen, MAC Representative, Chad Leqve, Director of Environment, and Dana Nelson, Assistant Manager – Noise, Environment and Planning, will be presenting the results of the Noise Monitoring Study and be available for discussion. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not Applicable SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: MAC Edina and St. Louis Park Noise Monitoring Study Prepared by: Brian Hoffman, Director of Inspections Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Study Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 2) Title: Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) Noise ReportPage 2 Study Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 2) Title: Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) Noise ReportPage 3 Study Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 2) Title: Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) Noise ReportPage 4 Study Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 2) Title: Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) Noise ReportPage 5 Study Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 2) Title: Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) Noise ReportPage 6 Study Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 2) Title: Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) Noise ReportPage 7 Study Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 2) Title: Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) Noise ReportPage 8 Study Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 2) Title: Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) Noise ReportPage 9 Study Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 2) Title: Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) Noise ReportPage 10 Study Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 2) Title: Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) Noise ReportPage 11 Study Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 2) Title: Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) Noise ReportPage 12 Study Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 2) Title: Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) Noise ReportPage 13 Study Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 2) Title: Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) Noise ReportPage 14 Study Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 2) Title: Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) Noise ReportPage 15 Study Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 2) Title: Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) Noise ReportPage 16 Study Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 2) Title: Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) Noise ReportPage 17 Study Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 2) Title: Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) Noise ReportPage 18 Study Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 2) Title: Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) Noise ReportPage 19 Study Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 2) Title: Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) Noise ReportPage 20 Study Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 2) Title: Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) Noise ReportPage 21 Study Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 2) Title: Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) Noise ReportPage 22 Study Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 2) Title: Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) Noise ReportPage 23 Study Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 2) Title: Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) Noise ReportPage 24 Study Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 2) Title: Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) Noise ReportPage 25 Study Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 2) Title: Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) Noise ReportPage 26 Study Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 2) Title: Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) Noise ReportPage 27 Study Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 2) Title: Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) Noise ReportPage 28 Study Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 2) Title: Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) Noise ReportPage 29 Meeting: Study Session Meeting Date: February 9, 2015 Discussion Item: 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Fiber and Broadband Update RECOMMENDED ACTION: The purpose of this report is to provide the City Council with an update on recent and projected efforts in the area of fiber optic network build-outs and broadband initiatives in general. This report will reference several sections from an October 2012 fiber study and its recommendations, and some other related developments since then. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Are the activities described in this report and at the study session in alignment with Council expectations? Does the Council wish to provide further policy direction with respect to the planned activities described? SUMMARY: The City of St. Louis Park commissioned a study of its fiber optic network in late 2012. The goals of that study were to explore potential additional ways to leverage the existing or an expanded fiber network, and review options to require or incentivize developers to include fiber optic facilities in new construction or during significant remodeling. Much progress has been made relative to the report’s recommendations and there are now over 36 miles of publically-owned fiber facilities in St. Louis Park. An update on study recommendations is included. In addition, there have been a number of developments and potential opportunities in the field of broadband. These are also summarized below, and can be discussed in more detail at the study session. City staff will be in attendance to answer questions. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: City projects described herein have been included in the 2015 Capital Improvement Program. Hennepin County may be a funding source for some projects as part of its fiber initiative. Others would be financed by private sector entities. Some may result in revenues and valued services returned to the City. VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged community. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion Prepared by: Clint Pires, Chief Information Officer Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Study Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 3) Page 2 Title: Fiber and Broadband Update DISCUSSION FIBER STUDY UPDATES CTC Consulting completed a fiber study in late 2012. Overall, there has been much progress made and planned to realize Fiber Study Recommendations. Cooperation with the School District in these efforts continues to be strong. Each major recommendation in the Fiber Study is listed below followed by some recent accomplishments and near-term plans. Lease Access to Existing Fiber and Conduit to Enable Private Investment Meetings have been held with a number of private companies, though an actual lease is yet to materialize. The City is currently in serious discussions with a provider interested in leasing fiber assets by the Rec Center. The City has had positive previous experience with this provider. Incrementally Expand City Fiber A number of fiber assets were completed in 2013 and 2014, including: • France Avenue, as part of the reconstruction between 22nd and 26th streets. • The COP Shop at Texa-Tonka Shopping Center • Highway 7 / Louisiana Avenue during construction of the interchange • New conduit under Highway 100 north of Minnetonka Boulevard • A segment of fiber and conduit along Gorham Avenue near the St. Louis Park Library was acquired (also see St. Louis Park Library below) Build Fiber Between Park Nicollet’s Facilities Mr. Pires has invited Park Nicollet to discuss this. No interest has been expressed as of this time. However, it is expected interest might be generated by a 2015 fiber project along Excelsior Boulevard. Build Fiber to Parks & Recreation and Public Works Facilities 2014 saw fiber connected to buildings at Fern Hill, Nelson, and Browndale Parks. This enabled security systems and wi-fi internet access to these sites. Fiber and wi-fi are planned for installation at Louisiana Oaks and Birchwood park buildings, and the Wolfe Park Pavilion in 2015. The Brick House fiber connection is also planned for 2015. The Aquila Park connection is in the 2016 CIP. These are in addition to the many city buildings and West End atrium, where wi-fi public access is available. It is possible that fiber extensions to certain facilities may occur as part of the water meter replacement program to support the automatic meter reading data collection technology. Build Fiber to the City’s Third Water Tower The City has acquired the fiber to the Park Glen water tower. Also, conduit has been installed from existing fiber hand holds near the water towers at 34th & Wyoming and on Cedar Lake Road to the tower building, so these sites are ready for quick completion if a commercial leasing or other opportunity arises. The Park Glen water tower is currently being fully connected to support 800 MHz radio redundancy for the City’s dispatch center. Study Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 3) Page 3 Title: Fiber and Broadband Update Build Fiber to the St. Louis Park Library Hennepin County has approached the City about a significant investment in expanding City fiber assets in exchange for use of City fiber to the Library and throughout St. Louis Park. It is expected that this construction will be completed in 2015. Build Fiber Over Time to Key Economic Development Targets Fiber conduit along Utica Avenue and parts of Gamble Drive and the I-394 South Frontage Road is expected to be installed as part of the Central Park West project. Continue Installing Conduit During Capital Improvement Projects Examples of projects related to this recommendation include segments of France Avenue in 2013, Highway 7 / Louisiana Avenue in 2014, and Lake Street and Louisiana Avenue in 2015. At least as significant is the construction of fiber conduit in conjunction with Connect the Park! That occurred in 2014 and will continue in 2015. Complete Fiber Rings Where Possible During the Course of Routine Fiber and Conduit Installation The best examples of this scheduled for 2015 include Meadowbrook Boulevard, Excelsior Boulevard, and Wooddale Ave. This will be completed in conjunction with Hennepin County as part of its project to connect county buildings. Another link near Fire Station 1 creates a redundant fiber ring for it and other city buildings. Fiber Ordinance to Require or Incentivize Fiber Asset Installation for New Construction Among other strategies, the consultants evaluated one that has caught the eye of St. Louis Park: The prospect of reducing the costs at individual locations for future advanced broadband deployment by requiring or incentivizing some combination of cable pathways, fiber connections and internal fiber wiring to be built by developers and owners according to industry standards during construction, reconstruction, and rehabilitation projects. Until there is a clearer fiber strategy, this approach is likely to yield a less immediate benefit. That said, it is worth pursuing because it represents a small burden for developers, and a potentially noteworthy incremental longer-term benefit to the City. With the potential construction of the light rail system, the livability of St. Louis Park, and its proximity to Minneapolis, rehabilitation of existing residential units over time is likely to be an important phenomenon. That said, the City has been able to negotiate language in two recent agreements to incorporate requirements similar to those above – one with buildings and parks scheduled to be constructed at Central Park West and the Bader Development at France and 31st Street. At both sites, the developer will include fiber pathways to, as well as points of presence within, the buildings. Through an easement, these locations will be available to the City. Within each building, pathways will be to each living / working unit and be able to accommodate high speed connections. This was accomplished without an ordinance in place, and language in these two agreements is expected to be incorporated in an eventual ordinance. Since the 2012 study, CTC has very recently been re-engaged in part to assist in development of this ordinance. Study Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 3) Page 4 Title: Fiber and Broadband Update BROADBAND UPDATES CenturyLink CenturyLink recently announced that it is planning to both expand and enhance its broadband offerings to provide higher speed (1 gigabit service) in some of its Minnesota service areas. It is understood that CentruyLink will continue to leverage its copper wire infrastructure, while adding fiber facilities and electronics as needed or warranted. It is important to note that CenturyLink has indicated it does not currently promise to provide faster or fastest gigabit speeds to every premise in every service area. While CenturyLink announced this new offering in August 2014, it appears the higher speed service is currently available to a very limited number of its customers metro-wide. It is expected that more information will be forthcoming as CenturyLink also pursues video franchise agreements in Minnesota. Comcast While not directly related to broadband service, one recent development of Comcast’s business operations should be noted. An XFINITY Experience Center (Comcast customer service center) is opening in St. Louis Park on Monday, February 16th. It will be located at 4620 Excelsior Boulevard and store hours will be Monday through Saturday, 9 a.m. to 7 p.m.; Sunday 11 a.m. to 5 p.m. SWLRT One of the most important projects likely to occur in St. Louis Park in the future is the light rail project. Understandably, Council is concerned that the City is prepared technologically for this project, and especially at the stations. Two points are currently important here. First, city fiber facilities essentially parallel the SWLRT corridor on both its north and south sides from Beltline Boulevard to the western bounder. Of particular note, our fiber conduit is already extremely close to the three planned LRT stations. This leads to the second point: City staff has met to develop a list of potential technology enhancements for consideration at and around the stations and related parking areas. City staff is currently waiting for an audience with the Southwest Project Office to discuss the feasibility of incorporating these enhancements, understanding it would likely be at City cost. Overall Fiber Strategy One item Council has requested is further investigation of fiber futures for St. Louis Park. This was reinforced at the Council’s recent workshop as technology emerged as a top priority. While most city and school institutional fiber needs have been met for some time, and public wi-fi access points continue to be added, one question is: What might be a way to see high-speed, broadband access provided to every home, apartment, business, and other institution in St. Louis Park? Quality of life, economic development, medical and high-tech industry opportunities, home-based businesses, and environmental sustainability are just some key success factors to ensure St. Louis Park remains attractive and competitive. To fulfill this strategic objective, and help form a broader community broadband strategy, City staff has been in discussions with US Internet, a Minnetonka-based Internet Service Provider (ISP). USI implemented the Minneapolis wi-fi project, and has more recently begun to install and offer fiber-to-the-premise (FTTP) high-speed, broadband service in that city. Staff have started field research and engaged CTC Consulting to advise the city on potential opportunities for USI to offer similar FTTP services in St. Louis Park. As USI continues to build out FTTP in Minneapolis over time, its officials have indicated a strong interest in building fiber to each premise in St. Louis Park over the next 3 – 4 years. While many factors can affect these plans Study Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 3) Page 5 Title: Fiber and Broadband Update and timelines, this private sector initiative presents a rare and significant opportunity to see Council’s vision of a technology-enabled community - attractive to businesses, residents, and visitors – more fully realized. While the City has met with other major Internet Service Providers in the past to encourage such build outs and potential partnerships, USI is the only firm to step forward thus far. Of course, the City would continue to offer similar arrangements to any ISP interested in enhancing high-speed, fiber based Internet choices in St. Louis Park. The goal is to foster a technology-enabled community. One way to accomplish that is encourage increased private sector broadband choices for all St. Louis Park stakeholders. Meeting: Study Session Meeting Date: February 9, 2015 Discussion Item: 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Small Cell Antenna Applications RECOMMENDED ACTION: No action required at this time. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Is the City Council willing to consider allowing the installation of small cells antenna in the right-of-way and, if so, under what circumstances? SUMMARY: The increased use in wireless devices has prompted the need for technology changes in how coverage for cellular data is distributed by cell phone providers. Unlike cell towers we have seen in the past, or large antenna attached to tall buildings or towers, the new technology is smaller antenna closer to the ground on traditional utility poles. Based on recent requests from wireless carriers, it has become clear that existing ordinances do not accommodate this new technology. In addition, each wireless carrier is providing their own solution to meet the increased demand and shared sites do not fit into these solutions. The City has received requests from two wireless carriers to install small cell antenna on existing utility poles in the City. Staff is looking for direction in how to balance the need for wireless service with the location and size of these proposed antennas. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: None at this time. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion AT&T Proposal Exhibits Verizon Proposal Exhibits Prepared by: Phillip Elkin, Sr. Engineering Project Manager Reviewed by: Debra M. Heiser, Engineering Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Study Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 4) Page 2 Title: Small Cell Antenna Applications DISCUSSION Background: Small cell sites are antenna installations consisting of small wireless antenna and radios mounted to existing structures, typically located in a Right-of-Way. A small cell is a mini cell antenna measuring approximately 18 inches in height and is located on existing utility poles closer to the ground than traditional cell antenna. While they can be located on buildings, the proposals submitted to the City are for Xcel poles and existing street lights. Each carrier is experiencing different coverage issues, so the proposals for small cells vary in location and installation. AT&T Proposal AT & T has proposed coverage in the Browndale neighborhood by installing small cell antennas on 14 existing Xcel power poles. In addition to mounting an antenna on the existing poles, the proposal also includes installing a control box on the ground adjacent to the poles (see exhibits) with a concrete base. These control boxes are proposed to be on a concrete slab in the right-of way. City Staff has not acted on this proposal based on the following concerns: • The proposed antennas do not meet the current ordinance. Our ordinance requires equipment to be housed on a pole or in a structure-structures are not allowed in right-of- way • The antenna places an additional structure in the boulevards of homes. • Co-location is not provided. Only one provider per pole • The number of structures in a concentrated area In reviewing the submitted materials, Staff has asked AT&T for more information on the technology in hopes of finding a conforming, less intrusive design. Verizon Request The submittal from Verizon is for two small cell locations in the West End area. In this case Verizon would remove an existing light pole, and replace it with a custom built structure (from the same manufacturer) that maintains the look and appearance of the original structure, but includes mounting locations for small cell equipment. This installation does not require any ground equipment. Attached are example photos of Verizon’s small cell installations located in Saint Paul. In this case the location and installation meet the intent of the City ordinance, but there may be a discussion on the aesthetics of the attachment. Small Cell Xcel pole location map2Study Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 4) Title: Small Cell Antenna Applications Page 3 3LatitudeLongitudeNameAddress44.919210‐93.344733Xcel4600 Browndale Avenue44.922410‐93.340423Xcel4326 Wooddale Ave. S.44.925331‐93.346688Xcel4161 Toledo Avenue South44.919694‐93.342011Xcel4405 W 44th St.44.920255‐93.339172Xcel4225 W. 44th St.44.925360‐93.339916Xcel4251 West 42 1/2 Street44.926905‐93.340338Xcel4151  West 42nd Street44.928420‐93.342514Xcel4841 West 41st Street44.928714‐93.337933Xcel4093 Monterey Avenue44.926337‐93.344167Xcel 4201 Wooddale Avenue South44.921370‐93.344030Xcel4351 Browndale Avenue44.925340‐93.342200Xcel 4242 Wooddale Avenue South44.920456‐93.345985Xcel4362 Coolidge Avenue44.923411‐93.341202Xcel4280 MorningsideSmall Cell Xcel pole location dataStudy Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 4) Title: Small Cell Antenna Applications Page 4 Study Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 4) Title: Small Cell Antenna Applications Page 5 Study Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 4) Title: Small Cell Antenna Applications Page 6 Study Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 4) Title: Small Cell Antenna Applications Page 7 Study Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 4) Title: Small Cell Antenna Applications Page 8 Study Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 4) Title: Small Cell Antenna Applications Page 9 Meeting: Study Session Meeting Date: February 9, 2015 Discussion Item: 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Check-in on Results of City Council Workshop RECOMMENDED ACTION: No action required. The Council is asked to provide feedback on staffs’ effort to articulate the five priorities/goals that were developed at the Workshop. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Is the summary of the five priorities/goals attached to this report consistent with the City Councils intentions from the Workshop? SUMMARY: On January 15/16 the City Council held its annual workshop with a primary goal of reaching consensus on “Big Bowl” priorities for the next ten years. A great deal was accomplished and the Council came to agreement on five goals/priorities along with examples of 2025 Sun Sailor Headlines to illustrate what success could look like. Attached is a draft document titled “City Council Priorities/Goals – 2015 to 2025”. Staff desires feedback on whether the Council’s intentions from the Workshop are illustrated accurately. Staff also provides a paragraph under each of the priorities/goals which is intended to articulate staffs impressions of why the Council felt a particular priority was important. This will be very helpful as staff begins to work on specific strategies and actions steps for each of the five areas. In addition, being able to explain why the Council selected these five areas will be helpful when this is presented to the community in the future. After receiving feedback from the Council staff will then take about the next 90 days to develop specific strategies and a two year action plan for making progress on each of the five priorities/goals. This will be brought back for the Councils review as well. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable at this time VISION CONSIDERATION: All areas of the City Councils five original Strategic Directions are impacted by the priorities/goals developed at the Council Workshop. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: City Council Priorities/Goals – 2015 to 2025 Prepared by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Priorities/Goals – 2015 to 2025 Priority/Goal - Redevelopment around the three SWLRT Stations is maximized to the fullest extent possible. Why is this important? – The SWLRT project presents an incredible opportunity not afforded to most other cities. If implemented correctly, St. Louis Park will experience significant economic growth and vitality while providing additional transportation options to those that live or work here. It is imperative that we take advantage of this unique opportunity through a thoughtful and collaborative planning and implementation process. Strategies to Achieve Goal – (to be developed by staff) Two Year Action Plan – (to be developed by staff) Priority/Goal – St. Louis Park is a leader in environmental stewardship, sustainability and resiliency. Why is this important? – Because it’s the right thing and smart thing to do. Being stewards of the environment is the responsibility of everybody. Preventing or limiting the impact of climate change, the depletion of natural resources and the degradation of our water and air require constant attention and a commitment to change. The City is uniquely positioned to effect positive change at the local level through programs, initiatives and community education. Strategies to Achieve Goal – (to be developed by staff) Two Year Action Plan – (to be developed by staff) Priority/Goal – St. Louis Park is a technology connected community Why is this important? – Broadband speed and capacity requirements continue to grow as technology and the Internet continue to evolve. A community that is connected by a very robust and comprehensive Broadband system will set itself apart and be better able to promote economic growth, innovation and community development. High speed Broadband enables the exchange of information in many different forms and is vital to high-tech and medical industry growth, and to the delivery of services in education, health, government, public safety, and for overall quality of life. Given the significant amount of fiber infrastructure in place that is owned by the City, we are uniquely situated to take advantage of the digital economy. Study Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 5) Title: Check-in on Results of City Council Workshop Page 2 Strategies to Achieve Goal – (to be developed by staff) Two Year Action Plan – (to be developed by staff) Priority/Goal – St. Louis Park has top ranked schools, a well maintained and diverse housing stock, and strong, vibrant neighborhoods. Why is this important? – These items are critical ingredients for insuring that St. Louis Park continues to be a highly desirable place for people to live and invest themselves in the community. Strategies to Achieve Goal – (to be developed by staff) Two Year Action Plan – (to be developed by staff) Priority/Goal – St. Louis Park has high quality community amenities and facilities Why is this important? – High quality parks, open space and other community facilities and amenities are building blocks for insuring a high quality of life and making St. Louis Park competitive in the marketplace as a great place to live. Strategies to Achieve Goal – (to be developed by staff) Two Year Action Plan – (to be developed by staff) Important Note - The five priorities and goals noted above are intended to articulate and provide direction to staff on those things the Council feels will have the most powerful/positive impact on the St. Louis Park community by 2025. This will allow staff to orient work plans and resources accordingly. These five priorities/goals will be reviewed annually to make sure they are still relevant, and course corrections will be made by the Council as necessary. Finally – Staff should recognize that above all else it must continue to provide collaborative, high quality and responsive services to insure that St. Louis Park is the most desirable place to live, work and do business. Study Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 5) Title: Check-in on Results of City Council Workshop Page 3 Meeting: Study Session Meeting Date: February 9, 2015 Written Report: 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Proposed Allocation of 2015 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds RECOMMENDED ACTION: No action required at this time. This report is being provided to inform the Council of the proposed allocation of 2015 CDBG funds. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council concur with the recommendations made for the allocation of $199,308 in 2014 CDBG funds? SUMMARY: Each year the City must decide how to use its annual allocation of CDBG Funds. CDBG funds are US Housing and Urban Development (HUD) funds distributed through Hennepin County. The allocation amount for cities within the county is based on a calculation of 2010 census poverty data. The City must submit its proposed use of the allocation to Hennepin County by February 26th. Prior to submittal, the City must hold a public hearing. The hearing and official City Council action is scheduled for February 17th. This year’s proposed use of CDBG funds reflects the City’s priorities to preserve existing housing and increase affordable ownership opportunities. Ninety-six percent of the allocation, or $191,808 of the $199,308 focuses on assisting low-income residents with emergency repairs, rehab loans, improvement projects and affordable ownership opportunities. The remaining amount is proposed for youth park programming at Meadowbrook Manor Park. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: CDBG funds allow cities discretion (within the HUD guidelines) to fund projects that meet the national low income objectives and the needs of cities. CDBG funding is expected to remain close to the fiscal year 2014 funding level; however, the federal budget has yet to be finalized. 2014 funding levels will be used for planning purposes until the 2015 allocation is finalized. St. Louis Park will receive an estimated $199,308 in 2015. The 2015 CDBG year runs from July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2016. Staff anticipates the proposed projects can expend the funds in a timely manner as has been our historical practice of fully expending CDBG funds. Final funding amount may vary slightly from the estimate. Staff will keep Council apprised of actual funding amounts. VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a well-maintained and diverse housing stock. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion Proposed Program Descriptions Draft Resolution Prepared by: Marney Olson, Housing Programs Coordinator Reviewed by: Michele Schnitker, Housing Supervisor Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Study Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 6) Page 2 Title: Proposed Allocation of 2015 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds DISCUSSION BACKGROUND: The national objectives of the CDBG program are to benefit low and moderate-income persons, prevention or elimination of slum or blight and/or to meet a particular urgent community development need. From a policy perspective, the City Council has typically focused CDBG funds on “sticks and bricks” improvements to the housing stock for low-income families, for both single-family (SF) owners and multifamily housing residents. A small portion of funds have also been allocated to support public services for St. Louis Park Housing Authority (SLPHA) residents and park programming for low-income youth. PRESENT CONSIDERATIONS: The proposed use of CDBG funds reflects the City’s priorities to preserve existing housing and increase affordable ownership opportunities. This year’s proposed allocation is summarized in Table 1 below. Ninety-six percent of the allocation focuses on assisting low-income residents with emergency repairs, rehab loans, home renovations and affordable ownership opportunities. The remaining amount is proposed for youth park programming at Meadowbrook Manor Park. Historically, the City has allocated CDBG funds to non-profit affordable housing providers to assist with their building renovations. Perspectives is requesting funds for patio door and deck replacement and Wayside is requesting funds for both interior and exterior rehab. Table 1: Proposed 2014 CDBG Allocation Project Activity Proposed Ongoing Activity Allocation Low Income Single Family Emergency Repair Program $50,000 yes Low Income Single Family Home Rehab Loan $60,000 yes Affordable Housing Land Trust – Homes within Reach $20,000 yes St. Louis Park Housing Authority – Rehab for scattered site home $10,808 yes Perspectives, Inc. – Patio Doors and Decks $30,000 no Wayside – Rehab at Wayside Supportive Housing $21,000 no Public Service – Youth Park Programming at Meadowbrook Park $7,500 yes Total $199,308 NEXT STEPS: The St. Louis Park Housing Authority (SLPHA) will review and discuss the proposed allocation at its February 11, 2015 meeting. The Commissioners’ comments will be shared at the Public Hearing on February 17, 2015. The following actions are required to receive 2015 CDBG funds: February 5, 2015 Publication of Public Hearing Notice February 17, 2015 Public Hearing and Approval of Resolution Outlining Proposed Activities February 26, 2015 Deadline for Submission of CDBG Application to Hennepin County Study Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 6) Page 3 Title: Proposed Allocation of 2015 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds Proposed Program Descriptions Emergency Repair Program – Single Family $50,000 This program is consistent with the Council’s focus on stick and bricks and has proven its responsiveness to low income seniors and vulnerable residents with annual incomes of 50% or less of the median area income, or $29,050 for a single person household, and assets less than $25,000. It provides grants of up to $4,000 for emergencies such as leaking roofs, plumbing repairs, water heaters or code violations. Community Action Partners for Suburban Hennepin County (CAPSH) currently administers this program for the City. This is an ongoing CDBG activity. Low Income Single Family Deferred Loan Program- $60,000 This is the primary ongoing CDBG rehab loan program targeted for homeowners with annual income of 50% or less of the median area income based on family size ($29,050 for a household of one, $41,450 for a household of 4) and assets less than $25,000. The rehab focuses on improvements to bring homes into code compliance and provide long-term maintenance free housing. The maximum loan amount is $30,000 and is forgiven after 15 years. Repayment is required if homeowners sell the property before the 15-year period expires. This program is administered by Hennepin County Housing staff. There is no longer a waiting list for the low income single family deferred loan program; however, there is still a need for this program in our community. Continued funding, along with the program income realized from repayment of previous CDBG deferred loans, should make it possible to serve two to five residents depending on project scope. Three residents received a deferred loan in 2014. Affordable Housing Land Trust – Homes Within Reach $20,000 Homes within Reach is a program of West Hennepin Housing Land Trust that purchases homes and sells them to low income homeowners. Buyers pay for the cost of the building only and lease the land for 99 years. St. Louis Park funds are leveraged with Met Council and Hennepin County HOME funds, and Homes within Reach administers this activity. Homes within Reach has purchased twelve homes in the city that have been sold to low income families. St. Louis Park Housing Authority – Cabinet renovations at scattered site homes - $10,808 The SLP Housing Authority provides housing to low income residents that are typically below 50% median income. The HA owns and manages 37 scattered site homes throughout the city. The HA has requested $10,808 to assist with replaing cabinets at scattered site homes. Each cabinet replacement project is expected to cost $8,000. CDBG funds will be utilized to assist in cabinet replacement at two scattered site homes identified in the CFP. Wayside House, Inc. –Rehab - $21,000 Wayside is requesting $21,000 in CDBG funds for upgrades and improvements to their Supportive Housing apartment building. This rehab project will include re-carpeting the community office area (staff offices and community meeting area), installing new security cameras, resurfacing and restriping the parking lot, and rehabbing two resident bathrooms. Wayside Supportive Housing provides permanent supportive housing for 20 families with children ages 0-18. Wayside House’s mission is to provide treatment, housing and social services to women who want to get sober from drugs and alcohol and live a life of recovery. About 95% of families who enter program meet the federal guidelines of poverty with incomes of 5K to 10k per year. Study Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 6) Page 4 Title: Proposed Allocation of 2015 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds Perspectives Louisiana Court Patio Door and deck replacement project - $30,000 The project replaces 12 deteriorating patio doors with 8 new energy efficient patio doors and 4 new energy efficient windows. It also repairs 8 decks and removes 4 Juliet balconies. The stucco will also be re-dashed on both buildings since water penetration from the patio doors has caused chipping/cracking. Perspectives ' supportive housing program is located in five apartment buildings at Louisiana Court. This project will be for two of the buildings (2759 & 2765 Louisiana Court) utilized for their Permanent Housing program. Perspectives provides comprehensive supportive housing for homeless women and children. Women and children are the fastest growing homeless population in Hennepin County and in the Nation. CDBG funds will assist in financing this project. Public Service – SLP Park and Rec. Programming at Meadowbrook Manor Parks - $7,500 The Park and Recreation Department provides park programming to children at the Meadowbrook Manor Apartment Community. The $7,500 would provide an enhanced level of programming and ensure affordable registration fees. The youth park programming has been funded with CDBG funds since 2007. Meadowbrook Manor Park is CDBG eligible based on the poverty levels in this neighborhood. Study Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 6) Page 5 Title: Proposed Allocation of 2015 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds DRAFT RESOLUTION NO. 15 - ____ RESOLUTION APPROVING PROPOSED USE OF 2015 URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM FUNDS AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENT WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY AND ANY THIRD PARTY AGREEMENTS WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park, through execution of a Joint Cooperation Agreement with Hennepin County, is cooperating in the Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program; and WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park has developed a proposal for the use of 2015 Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant funds made available to it; and WHEREAS, the City held a public hearing on February 17, 2015 to obtain the views of citizens on housing and community development needs and priorities and the City's proposed use of $199,308 from the 2015 Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant. BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of St. Louis Park approves the following projects for funding from the 2015 Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program and authorizes submittal of the proposal to Hennepin County. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby authorizes and directs the Mayor and its City Manager to execute the Subrecipient Agreement and any required Third Party Agreement on behalf of the City to implement the 2015 Community Development Block Grant Program. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that should the final amount of FY2015 CDBG available to the city be different from the preliminary amount provided to the city, the City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to adjust project budget(s) to reflect an increase or decrease in funding. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council February 17, 2015 City Manager Mayor Attest: City Clerk Project Activity Allocation Low Income Single Family Emergency Repair Program $50,000 Low Income Single Family Home Rehab Loan $60,000 Affordable Housing Land Trust – Homes within Reach $20,000 St. Louis Park Housing Authority – Rehab for scattered sites $10,808 Wayside House, Inc. – Rehab at Wayside Supportive Housing $21,000 Perspectives – Patio Door and Deck Replacement $30,000 Public Service – Youth Park Programming at Meadowbrook Park $7,500 Total $199,308 Meeting: Study Session Meeting Date: February 9, 2015 Written Report: 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: 2015 Traffic Signal Installation Update-Elmwood Neighborhood RECOMMENDED ACTION: No action required at this time. Please inform staff of any questions you might have POLICY CONSIDERATION: Are there any reasons the Council does not wish to pursue these projects? SUMMARY: The Engineering staff has been working on signalization plans for the intersection of Wooddale Avenue and 36th Street (Project No. 4014-1300). After a public meeting in July, City staff began investigating additional improvements which could be implemented as part of this project. Since that time, an additional traffic signal at the Xenwood and 36th Street, which was originally planned for 2018 construction, was added to the project. Conflicts with a MnDOT project on the 36th Street Bridge prevented this project from being constructed in 2014. An additional meeting was held with the Elmwood Neighborhood in November and at this time City Staff is prepared to advertise the project for bids. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The Engineer’s Estimate for the proposed traffic signal project is $388,669. Both signals are included in the City’s CIP and funded using Elmwood TIF. Once bids have been received, the project will be brought to council for award. VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged community. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion Exhibit 1: Wooddale and 36th Intersection Exhibit 2: Xenwood and 36th Intersection Prepared by: Phillip Elkin, Sr. Engineering Project Manager Reviewed by: Debra M. Heiser, Engineering Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Study Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 7) Page 2 Title: 2015 Traffic Signal Installation Update-Elmwood Neighborhood DISCUSSION Background: After presenting the project update to the City Council at the September 22, 2014 Study Session, the signal at 36th and Xenwood was added to the 2015 CIP. The neighborhood was updated regarding this project at the Elmwood Neighborhood Association meeting on November 13th at Aldersgate United Methodist Church. The signal project was well received by those present. The plans and specifications for the intersection improvements as well as traffic signals on 36th at the Wooddale and Xenwood intersections have been completed. The project includes the following improvements: Traffic Signal: Wooddale and 36th Street (Project No. 4014-1300) • Remove the west approach median to provide a left turn lane. • Restripe the south approach to include a dedicated left turn lane. • Reconstruct the Wooddale Ave. right turn lane islands to accommodate bigger vehicles. • Modify the southwest corner edge of pavement to accommodate westbound to southbound vehicles. • Install pedestrian crosswalks on the all approaches • APS/ countdown timers for all legs of the intersection • Install new traffic signals to optimize signal timing and pedestrian crossing times. • Install signals with flashing yellow arrows on all left turn movements for off-peak times Traffic Signal: Xenwood Ave. and 36th Street (Project No. 4018-1300) • Install traffic signals. • Restripe the north and south approaches to include left and right turn lanes. • Install pedestrian crosswalks on all approaches • APS/ countdown timers for all legs of the intersection • Flashing yellow on left turn movement off of west bound 36th Street • Pole arm will be extended on east bound 36th street for future dedicated left turn lane The projects will be bid together and construction is expected to start in May 2015. Oxford Street The November meeting also included a continued discussion regarding the potential one-way to two-way conversion for Oxford Street west of Wooddale Avenue. This proposal was received with a mixed response. City staff is still looking to implement two-way traffic on Oxford on a trial basis. Additional traffic analysis is planned for 2015 with the understanding that any changes, temporary or permanent, will be discussed with the neighborhood first and then brought to City Council for approval. HWY 7 and Wooddale Signal MnDOT has completed their intersection analysis for the TH 7/ Wooddale Ramps. According to MnDOT, the intersections do not meet any of the signal warrants. However, since Wooddale is a City street that is grade separated from the TH 7 mainline, MnDOT will approve signalized control at the ramp terminals due to the expected SWLRT project. Consistent with the MnDOT cost participation policy, since the signal does not meet warrants, the City would be responsible for the full cost of the signal installation. The expected cost for theses signal improvements would be $500,000 to $750,000. Study Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 7) Page 3 Title: 2015 Traffic Signal Installation Update-Elmwood Neighborhood If the City wanted to move ahead with installing the signals now we would need to obtain MnDOT approval, coordinate with the railroad on a signal preemption agreement, and allow for SWLRT project office (SPO) review. It is anticipated that it would take around 6 months to develop plans and obtain the required approvals. These signals are included as a part of the Southwest LRT base project. We have requested that the signals be installed early in the phasing of the project. SPO indicated that they could work with us, but would not know phasing until later this year. Staff has also asked if it would be possible for the SPO to enter into an agreement with the City so that we could install the signals earlier and have the SPO reimburse us. The SPO has indicated that this could occur, but only after the SWLRT Record of Decision (ROD). The ROD is scheduled for first quarter 2016. We will continue to work on moving this improvement forward with MnDOT and the SPO. Study Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 7) Title: 2015 Traffic Signal Installation Update-Elmwood NeighborhoodPage 4 Study Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 7) Title: 2015 Traffic Signal Installation Update-Elmwood NeighborhoodPage 5 Meeting: Study Session Meeting Date: February 9, 2015 Written Report: 8 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Comprehensive Plan Amendments Related to Planned Unit Developments RECOMMENDED ACTION: No action required at this time. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the Council have any questions or concerns regarding the proposed Comprehensive Plan text amendments related to the recently approved planned unit development (PUD) zoning ordinance? SUMMARY: The City recently revised the PUD section of the Zoning Code, including the approval process, as well as other procedural, text and policy revisions. The changes allow the City Council more discretion and flexibility to approve PUDs. One of the policy changes included removing limitations on modifying district regulations. Similar amendments are needed in the Comprehensive Plan to accomplish the flexibility intended in the recent zoning ordinance amendments. Therefore, staff proposes text amendments to the Comprehensive Plan to be consistent with the recently approved new PUD ordinance. The changes remove specific density limitations associated with the PUD process in the “Land Use Plan” and “Plan Implementation” chapters of the Comprehensive Plan. These changes apply to the RH – High Density Residential, C – Commercial, O – Office and MX – Mixed Use land use categories of the Comprehensive Plan. Detail of the revisions is attached to this report. The public hearing is scheduled for the February 4, 2015 Planning Commission meeting, and the Council is tentatively scheduled to take action on this item February 17, 2015. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: None. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Draft Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments The complete Comprehensive Plan can be found at: http://www.stlouispark.org/comprehensive-plan.html Prepared by: Ryan Kelley, Associate Planner Reviewed by: Sean Walther, Senior Planner Michele Schnitker, Housing Supervisor Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Excerpt of Land Use Plan Chapter Where We Are Headed This section of the Land Use chapter establishes the City’s official land use categories and the 2030 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map, which is intended to guide current and future land use planning and development through the year 2030. The land use plan categories are fully defined below. The 2030 map is the official land use designation map for the City. The land use designations are intended to shape the character, type and density of future development according to sound planning principles. Any new development, redevelopment, change in land use, or change in zoning is required to be consistent with the land use guiding for each parcel. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Categories There are 12 land use categories that guide the City’s 2030 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map, which are described below. In general, the categories reflect a movement towards greater mixing of uses. I. RL - Low Density Residential The Low Density Residential category is intended primarily for single-family detached housing. This category allows net residential densities from three (3) to seven (7) units per acre. II. RM - Medium Density Residential The Medium Density Residential category allows net residential densities from six (6) to 30 units per acre. This category allows for a variety of housing types including single family detached, duplexes, townhomes, and small two- and three-story apartment buildings. III. RH - High Density Residential The High Density Residential land use category is intended for higher density, compact urban residential development, including high-rise apartment buildings. This category allows for a net residential density range of 20 to 75 50 units per acre;. however zoning will allow only up to 50 units per acre except hHigher densities may be achieved by utilizing the PUD process and addressing Livable Communities Principles and other goals of the Comprehensive Plan such as including structured parking, affordable housing, or incorporating sustainable site and building design elements. Under a PUD, 75 units per acre may be developed if within 1,000 feet of a park. The appropriate building height will vary by development and depend upon the characteristics of the development and its surroundings. Pedestrian-scale, three- to four-story buildings will be appropriate in some areas, while six- to eight-story buildings and even taller high-rises will be acceptable in others. In addition to residential development, a small proportion of supportive retail and service is also appropriate. Retail, service and office beyond those supporting the residential development would only be permitted as part of a mixed-use PUD. IV. C - Commercial The Commercial land use category is intended to accommodate a wide range and scale of commercial uses, such as retail, service, entertainment, and office. Commercial uses can range from small neighborhood convenience nodes, to community retail areas along major roadways, to large shopping centers, to auto-related commercial uses along freeways. Residential uses are also appropriate as part of a mixed-use commercial development, with a net residential density Study Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 8) Title: Comprehensive Plan Amendments Related to Planned Unit Developments Page 2 range of 20 to 50 units per acre allowed. Higher densities may be achieved by utilizing the PUD process and addressing Livable Communities Principles and other goals of the Comprehensive Plan such as including structured parking, affordable housing, or incorporating sustainable site and building design elements. V. MX – Mixed-Use In the Mixed Use land use category, a mixing of uses including commercial is required for every development parcel. The goal of this category is to create pedestrian-scale mixed-use buildings, typically with a portion of retail, service or other commercial uses on the ground floor and residential or office uses on upper floors. Mixed use buildings typically have approximately 75 to 85 percent of the building for residential use and 20 to 25 percent for commercial or office uses. Taller buildings may be appropriate in some areas and net residential densities between 20 and 75 50 units per acre are allowed. Higher densities may be achieved by utilizing the PUD process and addressing Livable Communities Principles and other goals of the Comprehensive Plan such as including structured parking, affordable housing, or incorporating sustainable site and building design elements. The MX designation is intended to facilitate an integrated town center atmosphere in Park Commons and a diversity of uses in certain other areas of the community. VI. I - Industrial The Industrial land use category covers all industrial uses from manufacturing, assembly, processing, warehousing, storage, laboratory, distribution, and related offices. Industrial areas consist of both lighter industrial uses, which tend to have higher appearance standards and fewer impacts on surrounding properties, and general industrial uses which are typically set off from other uses. Current industrial uses tend to be concentrated around the City’s railroads, where industrial uses first developed in the community. Future industrial uses should primarily be located in close proximity to either a railroad line or regional roadway system with limited traffic circulation through residential and pedestrian oriented areas. VII. O - Office The Office land use category is primarily intended for employment centers of fairly intensive office and mixed use development with high floor area ratios (FARs) and building heights. Business, professional, administrative, scientific, technical, research, and development services are typical uses appropriate for the Office land use category. The Office category also allows other limited uses such as hotels, parking ramps, residential, day care, retail and restaurants when part of a larger development. VII. CIV-Civic The Civic land use category is intended for public buildings and uses as well as similar private uses, such as schools, government buildings, places of assembly, community centers, libraries, and non-profit institutions. Study Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 8) Title: Comprehensive Plan Amendments Related to Planned Unit Developments Page 3 I X. Plan Implement at ion Plan Implementation IX-A2 ComprehensivePlan Plan Implementat ion C omprehensive pla nning is a living process, as the community is continually changing and adapting. The Plan is continually used and updated to provide clear direction to city leaders. Implementation of the Plan is achieved in many ways and of ten in an incremental way. The Plan is intended as a guide for decisions to enable community growth and development over time. Comprehensive Plans are developed so that opportunities are recognized when they are consistent with physical conditions, economic opportunities, and the financia l capability of the city and the private sector. Implementation of specific items will be undertaken as an outcome of the current planning process. The Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances, the Capital Improvement Plan, and the Storm Water Management Plan are some of the method s to implement policies, plans, and programs contained in the Comprehensive Pla n. Changes to these documents are to be consistent with the provisions of the C omprehensive Pla n. Following is a list and explanation of identified changes the city will pursue as a result of this Pla n. Official Controls Zoning Code The Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 36 of City Code, establishe s regulations including land use, yard area, height, parking, tree preservation and architectural design. Associated with the Zoning Ordinance is the official zoning map. This map shows the different districts and their boundaries. St. Louis Park has eleven different zoning districts. The zoning district associated with a property can be found on the map; the standards for each district are located in the Zoning Ordinance. The table below identifies the City’s current zoning districts and allowable densities and lot sizes. It is expected the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map will be amended to carry out the intent of the new Business Park categories In the Land Use section to reflect the new categories and policies adopted as part of this Comprehensive Pla n. Zoning District Densit y (m a x) FA R Lot siz e minimum (sf ) Residential Res-PUD Non-residential R1 Single-family Residential 4.84 u/ac 9,000 R 2 Single-family Residential 6.05 u/ac 7,200 R 3 Two-family Residential 11 u/ac 7,200 R4 Multiple-family residential 30 u/ac 33 u/ac 8,000 RC High-density Residential 50 u/ac 55 u/ac 15,000 M X Mixed Use 75 u/ac 1.5 NA C1 Neighborhood Business 30 u/ac 33 u/ac 1.2 NA C1 General Commercial 50 u/ac 55 u/ac 2.0 NA O Office 75 u/ac 1.5 15,000 IP Industrial Park 0.5 15,000 IG General Industrial 1.0 5,000 Study Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 8) Title: Comprehensive Plan Amendments Related to Planned Unit Developments Page 4 Meeting: Study Session Meeting Date: February 9, 2015 Written Report: 9 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Annual Open to Business Program Update RECOMMENDED ACTION: None. Please inform staff of any questions you might have. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Are the results of this program in keeping with the Council’s expectations? SUMMARY: Under its contract with the EDA, the Metropolitan Consortium of Community Developers (MCCD) is required to provide regular updates detailing the small business technical services provided in St. Louis Park under its Open to Business program. This update covers activities during calendar year 2014. During the past year, MCCD staff met with 68 clients and provided 345 hours of service in the city. This is a significant increase over the 29 clients served and 120 hours of service provided in 2013. The majority of businesses served were in the service industry. The clients were nearly evenly split between start-up businesses and existing businesses. Services provided in 2014 included business entity advice, business plan development, loan packaging, feasibility analysis, lease review/negotiations, strategic planning, business purchase evaluation, operations and logistic planning, cash flow analysis, network referrals, record keeping, marketing, personal financial planning, real estate analysis, registration, licensing and regulatory. Approximately half of the clients heard about the program through the City’s publications. Last year a total of 17 jobs were retained or created in St. Louis Park as a result of the Open to Business program. In 2014, MCCD provided a second loan to a St. Louis Park guitar shop for $10,000 to increase inventory. MCCD also provided loans totaling more than $115,000 to four St. Louis Park residents to assist with their businesses outside the city. Counseling sessions occur the fourth Monday of each month from 9 a.m. to 11 a.m. at City Hall or by appointment at the place of business. There is no charge to those receiving these services. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The annual fee for the Open to Business propram is $10,000; half of which may be covered by a grant from Hennepin County. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Annual Open to Business Report from MCCD Prepared by: Julie Grove, Planning & Economic Development Assistant Greg Hunt, Economic Development Coordinator Reviewed by: Michele Schnitker, Housing Supervisor Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager and EDA Executive Director Study Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 9) Page 2 Title: Annual Open to Business Program Update City/County: Time Frame: Clients Served: Client Inquiries 13 New Entrepreneur/Start-up 27 Existing Business 28 Total 68 How did client hear about OTB: • Municipality (newsletter) 25 • Friends/Family 9 • Entrepreneur 2 • Bank Referral 5 • Internet 9 • Other 8 Direct & Facilitated Financing closed: # of loans 5 Amount $125,240 Capital Leveraged: $923,900 Jobs retained or created from OTB closed loan clients: 17 Program related hours TA/Admin: 345 Types of Services Provided: Business feasibility Business plan development Business Purchase evaluation Lease review/ negotiation Loan packaging Strategic planning Operations and logistic planning Record keeping Network/referrals Regulatory assistance Real estate analysis Cash flow analysis/ projections Personal Financial planning Marketing Business registration/ licensing St. Louis Park 1/1/14-12/31/14 Industry Segment: Service 30 Retail-general merchandise 10 Retail-food related 7 Manufacturing-other 3 Manufacturing – food 2 Construction/Real Estate 3 Types of Businesses: Sports products Group Home - Memory Care Guitar and accessories Hair accessories that style Micro Brewer - Tap Room On line sympathy gifts Computer repair/ recycle Packaging Micro Brewery Glass and glazing Car wash Safety Wear manufacturer Yoga, cycling, fitness Restaurant Fine men's salon Dental group Packaging Micro Brewery Fitness club Chiropractic practice Liquor Store- Convenience Escape from the Room operation Commercial cleaning Manage vending in an office building Pet sitting/dog walking Barber Shop Record store Yoga studio Investment club Printing Study Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 9) Page 3 Title: Annual Open to Business Program Update Client Highlights: Deportes Azteca, LLC Business Type: Retail store Location: Mercado Central Referred by: Non Profit organization MCCD Financing: $5,000 Other Financing/Equity: Jobs created/retained: 2 Rosalba Herrera and her partner Alfonso Zenedejas, St. Louis Park residents, started Deportes Azteca, LLC at the Minneapolis Mercado Central in 1998. The business, which sells clothing, shoes, and other products all related to soccer, has been an MCCD borrower since 1999. The business carries most of the famous Latino soccer teams’ uniforms and it is the main source of uniforms for Latino soccer teams in the Twin Cities. MCCD’s loan of $5,000 helped the business purchase spring inventory. The North Beach Deli, Inc Business Type: Restaurant Location: Minneapolis Referred by: Bank MCCD Financing: $10,000 Other Financing/Equity: Owned by Steven Hyde, a St. Louis Park resident and Richard Hurley, a Hopkins resident, The North Beach Deli opened in September 2011 in the Lake Calhoun Executive Center. The business is a cafeteria style restaurant serving tenants and customers of the executive center. MCCD’s loan of $10,000 helped the owners purchase an outdoor grill and furniture, which will allow customers to enjoy lunch on the shores of Lake Calhoun during the summer months. Badger Hill Brewing, LLC Business Type: Micro brewery Location: Shakopee Referred by: Bank OTB Financing: $100,000 Other Financing/Equity: $924,000 Jobs created/retained: 14 Badger Hill Brewing launched its craft beer sales in the summer of 2012. As a result of the company’s initial success, Badger Hill’s owners (two are St. Louis Park and Minnetonka residents) decided to relocate to a new location in Shakopee where the company will have its own brewing equipment and will be able to operate its own tap room. MCCD participated with Northeast bank in the $1.02 million project with financing of $100,000. El Diablo Inc. Business Type: Amps & guitar store Location: 6415 Walker St Referred by: Entrepreneur OTB Financing: $10,000 Jobs created/retained: 1 In 2012, owner Alan Estevez moved El Diablo, Inc., a high-end retailer of “boutique” music gear, from his home to a small showroom in St. Louis Park. A year ago, MCCD made a small inventory loan to the company. The result of that financing was a 40 percent increase of sales. MCCD closed on a second inventory loan of $10,000 in 2014 to help the company grow even more. . Credit Builder Loans: In 2014, MCCD provided one credit builder loan to a St. Louis Park resident. MCCD works in partnership with several nonprofit organizations to offer the credit building program. Our partners provide financial counseling in conjunction with small personal loans from MCCD. This combination of counseling with loans is helping program participants improve their credit scores, thus allowing for better interest rates for various types of lending. Study Session Meeting of February 9, 2015 (Item No. 9) Page 4 Title: Annual Open to Business Program Update Testimonials from St. Louis Park clients: ““I like how interested you are in the whole picture. I can see why you've been called the ‘Business Therapist’. -- Email from SLP client – 5/9/14 "Meeting with my Open to Business advisor is always refreshing! He’s been such a great mentor and teammate with all of this!” -- SLP Client - 7/9/14