The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2015/04/06 - ADMIN - Agenda Packets - City Council - RegularAGENDA APRIL 6, 2015 6:30 p.m. BOARDS & COMMISSIONS INTERVIEWS – Community Room 6:50 p.m. SPECIAL STUDY SESSION – Community Room Discussion Item 1. 30 min. 2015 Water Meter Replacement Report Item 2. Off-Sale Liquor License Application from Thien’s, Inc. for St. Louis Park Liquor 7:20 p.m. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY -- Council Chambers 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes 3a. Economic Development Authority Meeting Minutes March 2, 2015 4. Approval of Agenda 5. Reports 5a. Approval of EDA Disbursements 6. Old Business – None 7. New Business -- None 8. Communications -- None 9. Adjournment 7:30 p.m. CITY COUNCIL MEETING – Council Chambers 1. Call to Order 1a. Pledge of Allegiance 1b. Roll Call 2. Presentations 2a. Recognition of Donation 3. Approval of Minutes 3a. City Council Meeting Minutes March 2, 2015 3b. Special City Council Meeting (Closed Executive Session) March 23, 2015 4. Approval of Agenda and Items on Consent Calendar NOTE: The Consent Calendar lists those items of business which are considered to be routine and/or which need no discussion. Consent items are acted upon by one motion. If discussion is desired by either a Councilmember or a member of the audience, that item may be moved to an appropriate section of the regular agenda for discussion. The items for the Consent Calendar are listed on the last page of the Agenda. Meeting of April 6, 2015 City Council Agenda Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. To make arrangements, please call the Administration Department at 952/924-2525 (TDD 952/924-2518) at least 96 hours in advance of meeting. Recommended Action: Motion to approve the Agenda as presented and items listed on the Consent Calendar; and to waive reading of all resolutions and ordinances. (Alternatively: Motion to add or remove items from the agenda, or move items from Consent Calendar to regular agenda for discussion.) 5. Boards and Commissions – None 6. Public Hearings 6a. Central Park West - Public Hearing and First Reading of Ordinances Vacating Easements and Right-of-Way Recommended Actions: • Mayor to close public hearing • Motion to approve First Reading of an Ordinance Vacating a Public Sewer Easement and Sewer Construction Easements and set the Second Reading of Ordinance for April 20, 2015 • Motion to approve First Reading of an Ordinance vacating right-of-way and set the Second Reading of Ordinance for April 20, 2015 7. Requests, Petitions, and Communications from the Public -- None 8. Resolutions, Ordinances, Motions and Discussion Items 8a. Confirm Appointment of Melissa Kennedy to City Clerk for the City of St. Louis Park Recommended Action: Motion to Adopt Resolution Confirming the Appointment of Melissa Kennedy to the Position of City Clerk of St. Louis Park 8b. Environmentally Preferable Purchasing Policy Recommended Action: Motion to Adopt the Environmentally Preferred Purchasing Policy 8c. Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Recommended Action: • Motion to Adopt Resolution approving a Final Plat for Central Park West, subject to conditions; and • Motion to Adopt Resolution approving Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) for Central Park West, subject to conditions. 9. Communications -- None Meeting of April 6, 2015 City Council Agenda CONSENT CALENDAR 4a. Accept for filing City Disbursement Claims for the period of February 21, 2015 through March 27, 2015. 4b. Adopt a Resolution of Support for Bader Development’s submission of a grant application to the Hennepin County Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Program for its proposed Encore project. 4c. Designate Park Construction Company the lowest responsible bidder and authorize execution of a contract with the firm in the amount of $2,485,387.92 for the 2015 Local Street Rehabilitation Project (Area 3) - Project No. 4015-1003. 4d. Designate Thomas & Sons Construction, Inc., the lowest responsible bidder and authorize execution of a contract with the firm in the amount of $454,916 for the 36th Street W. at Wooddale Avenue and at Xenwood Avenue - Project# 4014-1300. 4e. Designate Insituform Technologies as the lowest responsible bidder and authorize execution of a contract with the firm in the amount of $273,460.80 for the Sanitary Sewer Main Rehab Project #4014-3003. 4f. Appoint City Clerk Melissa Kennedy as responsible authority and data practices compliance official under MN Statutes Chapter 13. 4g. Adopt Resolution Authorizing Revision of Parking Restrictions along Excelsior Boulevard at 4901, 4907, and 4911. 4h. Adopt Resolution approving acceptance of a monetary donation from Donna Hill in the amount of $50 for Westwood Hills Nature Center to be used for program supplies. 4i Approve for filing Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting Minutes of December 3, 2014 4j. Adopt Resolution authorizing final payment in the amount of $5,634.45 and accepting work for Fire Stations No. 1 and No. 2 Work Scope 18 (Painting) for Project Nos. 2008-3001 and 2008-3002, City Contract No. 59-11. 4k. Approve the agreement to allow Fire Department personnel to have access to the electronic patient record system within Park Nicollet. 4l. Approve Resolution of Support for Oppidan’s submission of a grant application to the Hennepin County Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Program for its proposed “Bally’s” redevelopment project. St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority and regular City Council meetings are carried live on Civic TV cable channel 17 and replays are frequent; check www.parktv.org for the schedule. The meetings are also streamed live on the internet at www.parktv.org, and saved for Video on Demand replays. The agenda is posted on Fridays on the official city bulletin board in the lobby of City Hall and on the text display on Civic TV cable channel 17. The agenda and full packet are available by noon on Friday on the city’s website. Meeting: Special Study Session Meeting Date: April 6, 2015 Discussion Item: 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Water Meter Replacement Project Update RECOMMENDED ACTION: The purpose of this discussion is to provide Council with an update on the comprehensive water meter replacement project and receive direction on the policy questions noted below. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Staff desires feedback on the following policy questions: 1. How does Council wish staff to address situations where property owners have not responded to multiple requests to schedule an appointment to replace their meter? 2. How does Council wish to respond to property owners that do not want a radio read meter? SUMMARY: At the February 17, 2015 Council Meeting, Council designated Ferguson Waterworks, Inc. as the lowest responsible life cycle bidder and authorized the execution of a $3.42M contract to replace all the water meters in the City. Due to the nature of the project, Ferguson’s installers will be entering every property in the City; therefore a considerable amount of planning has been done to coordinate the timing, communications and management of the project. Mark Hanson, Public Works Superintendent will be the Project Manager. TKDA, the developer of the bid proposal specifications, has been retained to provide Contract Management support. Project highlights are summarized below: • Approximate replacement of 12,800 residential, 813 commercial and 181 irrigation meters • The meters will be replaced by the contractor’s in-house staff • The project is anticipated to start mid-May and is expected to take 10-14 months • IR has developed a Communications Plan that includes assembling a Public Education package intended to be provided to each resident/business owner after the installation • Residents will have the option to schedule their meter replacement via a call center or a website. Installation times will be offered in two-hour windows, Monday – Saturday, 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Four successive notification letters will be sent out by the contractor requesting property owners to schedule an appointment. Based on the experience of other cities, approximately 80-85% of property owners are expected to respond by the third letter. The most common reason for not responding is refusing to let the contractor or City staff enter the house, or refusing to have a radio-read meter installed due to health concerns. Options for handling non-responsive property owners are provided later in this report. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Total project cost is budgeted at $3.6 million and is being paid via the Water Utility Fund. VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a leader in environmental stewardship and will increase environmental consciousness and responsibility in all areas of city business. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion Installation Notices and Shut-Off Notice Communications Plan Prepared by: Mark Hanson, Public Works Superintendent Reviewed by: Brian Swanson, Controller; Cindy Walsh, Operations and Recreation Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager DISCUSSION Background: At the August 25, 2014 Study Session, staff presented the advantages and disadvantages associated with several options for a city-wide meter replacement effort. Council directed staff to pursue a fixed network collection system. At the February 17, 2015 Council meeting, Council designated Ferguson Waterworks, Inc. as the lowest responsible life cycle bidder and authorized the execution of a $3.42M contract to replace all the water meters in the City. Project highlights are summarized below: • Approximate replacement of 12,800 residential, 813 commercial and 181 irrigation meters • The meters will be replaced by the contractor’s in-house staff • The residential meters will be replaced in six distinct areas per the six billing cycles • The project is anticipated to start mid-May and is expected to take 10-14 months • IR has developed a Communications Plan that includes assembling a Public Education package intended to be provided to each resident/business owner after the installation • Residents will have the option to schedule their meter replacement via a call center or a website. Installation times will be offered in two-hour windows, Monday – Saturday, 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Project Benefits: • Collecting meter readings with hourly data will provide greater customer service because meters showing either a continuous leak or an intermittent leak will be automatically flagged. Utility Billing staff can run a daily report showing the flagged accounts, notify customers of a possible leak, and provide steps that can be taken to identify where the leak is located so it can be repaired. Adopting a proactive approach to leak detection could save over one hundred million gallons of unbilled water each year, along with the staff time needed to work with customers who receive high bills as the result of leaks. • Allows the City the option of moving to monthly utility billing in the future (not recommended at this time, but may be considered in the future). The idea behind monthly billing is that it is easier for customers to plan for and pay a smaller monthly bill than it is a larger quarterly bill. As a reminder, the City also bills for solid waste, making the City’s utility bills larger than many comparable cities. • A fixed network system is the latest proven technology available to collect readings. Cities that have recently installed a fixed network system are receiving an average reading collection rate of greater than 99% per day. The redundancy in the data collectors allows for the majority of the City to be read even if a data collector fails due to a lightning strike or other reasons. Additionally, the fixed network system will allow for any of the meters to be read by drive-by technology if needed. • Some of our current meters are 30+ years old. As meters age, they slow down, leading to artificially low readings. Low readings result in lost revenue. On this point, however, it is important to note that some property owners may experience higher utility bills if their current meter is reading artificially slow/low. Should this happen, the City will not be billing retroactively for consumption, but will be billing the actual usage per the new meter. Utility Billing staff will be able to explain to the property owner why this occurred and will be prepared to address these questions. Special Study Session Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 1) Title: Water Meter Replacement Project Update Page 2 Anticipated Work Flow: The contractor will use the City’s water meter read schedule to plan their installation and notification schedule. We anticipate starting with Cycle 1 in mid-May, which is located in the northeast section of the City. Property owners in the active cycle area will receive the first of potentially four installation notices approximately 2-3 weeks prior to the anticipated start of the cycle. The next cycle will be notified when the current cycle is approximately 75% complete. If property owners outside of the active cycle area request an installation appointment, the contractor will ask the owners to call back after they receive their first notice. Exceptions will be allowed for extended absence customers wanting to complete the installation prior to their departure or for other reasonable situations. The following bullets represent the anticipated “work flow” for a property owner in an active cycle area: • Notice One sent out approximately two weeks prior to the start of an area • Resident schedules an appointment (either by call center or website) for a two-hour window, Monday – Saturday, 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. • When scheduling the appointment, the property owner will be asked to provide optional contact information (phone and e-mail), if Ferguson can adapt its technology, for future City communications. • At the completion of their current job, the installer will call the property owner saying they are in route and confirm an adult will be present during the installation. • Upon arrival, the uniformed installer will present his/her Identification Badge to the property owner and request access to complete the meter/transmitter installation. • The installer will replace the meter, wire/install the transmitter to the outside of the house (at the same location of the existing touchpad reader), and confirm successful installation. • Prior to leaving, the installer will show the resident how to read the meter, what to do should a leak develop, answer any questions, provide Ferguson’s contact information, and leave behind a pamphlet that contains information from a variety of City Departments. • Notices Two-Four will be sent as needed. If the property owner is still non-compliant after the 4th notice, a final notice will be sent with some type of repercussion(s) based on council policy direction at the study session. Data Collectors: The newly installed transmitters will be sending a signal to approximately six data collectors across the City. Final locations of the collectors have not been determined, but the goal is to install them on existing City-owned infrastructure or private property with pre-existing access rights. The antennas are similar to CB antennas and are very unobtrusive. Each antenna will be connected to a control box that will send the data back to City Hall via cellular transmission or the City’s fiber optic network. Options for Non-Responsive or Resistant Property Owners: Unfortunately, some property owners will resist scheduling an appointment. Based on the experience in other cities, the contractor and TKDA have indicated approximately 15 - 20% of Special Study Session Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 1) Title: Water Meter Replacement Project Update Page 3 property owners will resist scheduling an appointment through the third installation notice (see Attachment 1 for all four notices). How many of them respond to the fourth notice depends on the repercussion(s) for failure to respond. Discussions with other cities have identified the most effective methods of compliance (staff’s recommendation is identified in bold print): The contractor has also warned us that regardless of the wording on Notice #4, some property owners will still not respond and/or resist the installations due to health concerns related to the radio-read meters. Neighboring cities have used the following available options: Non-responsive Options: • Shut-off Water Service until the meter is replaced and the property will also incur a fee of $50.00 - $150.00 depending on time of the day. Door will be tagged 7 days prior to shut-off. • Allow them to keep their existing meter but charge a fee to read them each time. This fee would be $150/billing cycle. Health Concern Resistant Options: • Shut-off Water Service until the meter is replaced (Gas & Electric meters are already radio-read meters). Customer will also incur a fee of $50.00 - $150.00 depending on time of the day. Door will be tagged 7 days prior to shut-off. • Charge a fee to mount the transmitter at the farthest point from the home (such as far side of garage) • Allow them to keep their existing meter but charge a fee to read them each time. This amount could be based on a case by case basis. Communications Plan: Information Resources has developed a Communications Plan (attached) that will be used to coordinate the educational messages and information passed to the public. All forms of media will be used to get the word out about the reasons for replacing the meters, the benefits of fixed network collection, how to schedule your appointment, as well as updates on project milestones. IR will utilize the City’s website, social media, Cable TV, the Park Perspective and Sun Sailor as well as postcards and utility billing inserts – even the ParkAlert reverse 911 may be utilized for significant project updates. Anticipated Timeline: Public Education (see Attachment 2): Ongoing – Project Completion Notice #1 sent to Cycle 1 area properties: April – May 2015 Installation of residential meters/transmitters: May 2015 – Summer 2016 Installation of data collectors: May 2015 – June 2015 Implementation of Utility Billing software: May 2015 – June 2015 Installation of Commercial meters/transmitters March 2016 – July 2016 Next Steps: • Finalize data collection network (to include access agreements for private properties). Currently, two sites are anticipated to go on private property. IR is working with the property managers to coordinate access agreements. Expected completion: April 17, 2015 Special Study Session Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 1) Title: Water Meter Replacement Project Update Page 4 • Coordinate final drafts of notice letters with contractor. IR is currently coordinating message content and branding with contractor. Expected completion: April 17, 2015 • Finalize policy for non-responsive/resistant properties. PW will use Council direction received at the April 6, 2015 Study Session to develop written policy for responding to non-responsive/resistant property owners. Expected Completion: April 17, 2015 • Finalize City’s public education handout (to be left behind by installers). IR is currently coordinating handout content with each department. Expected Completion: April 30, 2015 Special Study Session Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 1) Title: Water Meter Replacement Project Update Page 5 WWAATTEERR SSHHUUTT OOFFFF NNOOTTIICCEE Service Address Account Number The water service to this property will be shut off tomorrow, MONTH DATE, YEAR at TIME for FAILURE TO PROVIDE ACCESS TO THE WATER METER a violation of the City of St. Louis Park Code. To avoid this loss of service, you must call Ferguson Waterworks at 1-888-818-8836 to schedule your appointment. Failure to comply will result in your water service being shut off until the meter is replaced and will incur a fee of $50 – $150 depending on the time of day. Again, please schedule your appointment by contacting Ferguson Waterworks at 1-888-818-8836, visit www.fergusonscheduling.com or use your smart phone to scan the QR code below. Evening and weekend appointments are available upon request. Scan me! Special Study Session Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 1) Title: Water Meter Replacement Project Update Page 6 St. Louis Park Water Meter Replacement Project Notice to Schedule Appointment Dear Water Service Customer, The St. Louis Park City Council established a water meter replacement project for the purposes of improving customer service, operational efficiencies and water conservation. The city has contracted with Ferguson Waterworks from Minnetonka, MN to do the improvements, which consist primarily of replacing about 13,800 water meters with new Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) meters. Ferguson Waterworks will need access to the water meter inside your home or business to perform the work, which typically takes about one hour. The water meter area will need to be clear of obstruction and accessible to the installer. The work will be performed by appointment, Monday through Saturday between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. To schedule an appointment, please contact Ferguson Waterworks at 1-888-818-8836, visit www.fergusonscheduling.com or use the QR code below: Scan Me! Ferguson Waterworks is an experienced meter installation contractor and their installers will wear uniforms, have an ID badge and drive clearly marked vehicles. Installers will come to your home or business within two hours of your scheduled appointment time. A person over the age of 18 must be present at the time of installation. The installer will perform only the work authorized by the city project, there are no direct charges to you. Ferguson Waterworks scheduling team will work to schedule a time for the water meter change out that is convenient for you. An appointment must be scheduled by you within two weeks of receiving this letter. The City of St. Louis Park and Ferguson Waterworks thank you for your cooperation in making this a successful program. Special Study Session Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 1) Title: Water Meter Replacement Project Update Page 7 Dear Water Service Customer, Did you forget to schedule your appointment? Ferguson Waterworks must enter your home or business to complete the work authorized by the City of St. Louis Park to replace your water meter. To schedule an appointment, please contact Ferguson Waterworks at 1-888-818- 8836, visit www.fergusonscheduling.com or use your smart phone to scan the QR code below. Evening and weekend appointments are available upon request. Scan me! Our scheduling team will work to schedule the water meter replacement at your convenience. To avoid further notices please schedule an appointment immediately. There is no charge for this service. The City of St. Louis Park and Ferguson Waterworks thank you for your cooperation in making this a successful program. CUSTOMER NOTIFICATION Mandatory Water Meter Replacement – SECOND NOTICE to Schedule Appointment Special Study Session Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 1) Title: Water Meter Replacement Project Update Page 8 CUSTOMER NOTIFICATION Mandatory Water Meter Replacement – THIRD NOTICE to Schedule Appointment Dear Water Service Customer, St. Louis Park is replacing water meters in your service area and has contracted Ferguson Waterworks to complete the installation of these meters. To schedule an appointment, please contact Ferguson Waterworks at 1-888-818-8836, visit www.fergusonscheduling.com or use your smart phone to scan the QR code below. Evening and weekend appointments are available upon request. Scan me! There is no cost to the customer for this meter replacement, but you must have your water meter replaced to be in compliance with the City of St. Louis Park Code. To install the new water meter: • Ferguson Waterworks will need to gain access to the service line area inside your home or business. • The area should be clear and accessible. • An adult 18 years old or older must be present at the time of installation. You will be asked to schedule an appointment spanning a two-hour block of time. The installer will arrive and complete the meter installation work within the two-hour time frame. The installation should take approximately one hour. Ferguson Waterworks is an experienced meter installation contractor. All installers will have ID, wear uniforms, travel in marked vehicles and have completed background checks. The City of St. Louis Park and Ferguson Waterworks thank you for your cooperation in making this a successful program. Special Study Session Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 1) Title: Water Meter Replacement Project Update Page 9 CUSTOMER NOTIFICATION Mandatory Water Meter Replacement – FOURTH AND FINAL Notice to Schedule Appointment Dear Water Service Customer, The City of St. Louis Park is replacing water meters in your service area and has contracted Ferguson Waterworks to complete the installation of these meters. To schedule an appointment, please contact Ferguson Waterworks at 1-888-818-8836, visit www.fergusonscheduling.com or use your smart phone to scan the QR code below. Evening and weekend appointments are available upon request. Scan me! There is no cost to the customer for this meter replacement, but you must have your water meter replaced to be in compliance with the City of St. Louis Park Code. To install the new water meter: • Ferguson Waterworks will need to gain access to the service line area inside your home or business. • The area should be clear and accessible. • An adult 18 years old or older must be present at the time of installation. You will be asked to schedule an appointment spanning a two-hour block of time. The installer will arrive and complete the meter installation work within the two-hour time frame. The installation should take approximately one hour. • Your cooperation is required. Please understand that if you do not respond to this notice and schedule an appointment, your water service will be discontinued in accordance with the City Code. Water Service will be shut off until the meter is replaced and you will incur a fee of $50 – $150 depending on the time of day. Ferguson Waterworks is an experienced meter installation contractor. All installers will have ID, wear uniforms, travel in marked vehicles and have completed background checks. The City of St. Louis Park and Ferguson Waterworks thank you for your cooperation in making this a successful program. Special Study Session Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 1) Title: Water Meter Replacement Project Update Page 10 Water Meter Replacement Project City of St. Louis Park Communications Plan Goals • To ensure homeowners and business owners are informed of the project in a timely manner. • To provide excellent customer service to the residents and business owners of St. Louis Park. • To provide city information (i.e. handout) to each homeowner / business owner. Breakdown of Communication Tools City Website – The website will have a designated article regarding the project and will be updated as new information is provided by city staff project leads and/or the contractor, Ferguson Water Works. It will also be spotlighted on the homepage under the Top Stories and Slider sections as necessary. Social Media – A series of informal messages regarding project updates. • Facebook – www.facebook.com/stlouispark • Twitter – www.twitter.com/stlouispark, @stlouispark • Nextdoor – www.nextdoor.com ParkAlert Citizen Notification System – The city’s reverse 911 system will be utilized for significant project updates as necessary. Neighborhood Outreach • Monthly updates (the same that are compiled for email updates) will be provided to neighborhood leaders for inclusion in their publications and website • Monthly Neighborhood Connections e-newsletter sent out by Community Liaison • Neighborhood Meetings – Present at Police Department neighborhood meetings • National Night Out – Attend nearby neighborhood parties Cable Television – We’ll highlight the progress of the project in several ways: • Monthly updates from staff lead that will be featured on Life in the Park. • Cable TV Billboard announcements (the informal screens that run on the Cable TV system between programming) • Potential special 3-5 minute package regarding the overall project. Park Perspective Newsletter – This city-wide publication will include a project progress report in each publication during the course of the project. Also, we’ll utilize the Parks & Recreation Brochure, published three times a year, as needed. Sun Sailor – Pitch stories to Seth Rowe, include updates in the Community Notes section. Postcards – Send out an initial postcard to all homeowners and business owners regarding the overall project, what to expect from city, contractor, etc. Utility Billing Inserts – Include project information in utility billing inserts, as timing allows. City Information Handout – City staff are creating a handout with city info and resources that Ferguson will hand out to each customer. Special Study Session Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 1) Title: Water Meter Replacement Project Update Page 11 Communication tools to be utilized in plan Communication Tool Description Deadlines City Website www.stlouispark.org Varies, allow 24-hours’ notice to post an article to the website(s); If you need assistance writing the article, please allow 72 hours. Facebook www.facebook.com/stlouispark Allow 24 hours’ notice to post; You’re encouraged to write posts ahead of time; can be scheduled. Twitter www.twitter.com/stlouispark Please allow 24 hours’ notice to post; Tweets must be 140 characters or less. Nextdoor (www.nextdoor.com) Private social network for neighborhoods Allow 24 hours’ notice for posts. ParkAlert Citizen Notification System www.stlouispark.org/parkalert/parkalert- citizen-notification-system.html Allow 12 hours’ notice. Neighborhood Newsletters Many neighborhoods publish several newsletters, Breanna’s e-newsletter Deadlines vary; Breanna Erickson is the contact. TV Billboard Advertisements Informal screens that run on the Cable TV system between programming on the city’s five Cable TV channels Varies, please allow up to one week for creation and scheduling. Life in the Park Weekly city TV news now airing on cable channels 14, 15/96, 16, 17 and YouTube (www.youtube.com/slpcable) Information for script due Fridays at noon. Contact Scott Smith. City Publications Park Perspective Newsletter (PP) Parks & Recreation Brochure (P&R) PP – Arrive in homes Feb. 15, May 15, July 15, Oct. 15 (Content deadline one month prior) P&R – Arrive in homes March 1, Aug. 1, Nov. 1 (Content deadline 1 ½ months prior) Sun Sailor Local media Deadlines vary; Sun Sailor has a 5 p.m. deadline on Wednesdays for publication the following week Postcards Please allow up to 2 weeks for design, review, print & mail. Utility Billing Insert Contact Utility Billing staff to determine dates. Please allow IR staff up to one week to design. City Information Handout Handout with city information and resources that Ferguson will deliver to each customer. City staff are working on this now; will need at least one week to print out of house. St. Louis Park Communications Contact: Nicole Pribbenow | Interim Communications & Marketing Coordinator Office (952) 924-2630 npribbenow@stlouispark.org Special Study Session Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 1) Title: Water Meter Replacement Project Update Page 12 Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 6, 2015 Written Report: 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Off-Sale Liquor License Application from Thien’s, Inc. for St. Louis Park Liquor RECOMMENDED ACTION: No action at this time. The purpose of this item is to provide an update on the Off-Sale Liquor License application from Thien’s, Inc. for the St. Louis Park Liquor location. POLICY CONSIDERATION: None at this time. This information is provided to Council in preparation for the public hearing set for April 20, 2015 regarding the liquor license application for St. Louis Park Liquor. Please contact us with any questions or concerns you might have. SUMMARY: On February 3, 2015 the City received an application from Thien’s Inc. dba St. Louis Park Liquor for an off-sale liquor license for the premises located at 6316 Minnetonka Boulevard, an existing off-sale liquor establishment. The application was submitted to the police department for the requisite background investigation on February 5, 2015. Several concerns were noted in the findings of the investigation, including this applicant’s history of liquor violations related to selling alcohol to a minor including one within the last five (5) years: 2005 Selling to Minor St. Louis Park location 2008 Selling to Minor Brooklyn Park location 2013 Selling to Minor St. Louis Park location Staff recommendation: Due to the nature of the violations, and with 2013 being the most recent incident, staff does not feel that the applicant meets the requirements for approval of a liquor license pursuant to City Code Sec. 3-70 and will recommend denial of the license application at the public hearing scheduled on April 20, 2015. Meeting with applicant: On March 26, 2015, City staff met with the applicant to discuss the findings of the background investigation and to inform him that staff would recommend denial of the license. City staff explained to the applicant that denial of the liquor license application could jeopardize future attempts to obtain a liquor license in the State of Minnesota. On March 27, 2015 the applicant contacted the City Clerk and confirmed his decision to continue the process and submit the application to the City Council for consideration. Next steps: As requested by the applicant, staff scheduled the public hearing for April 20, 2015 at 7:30 pm. Notice of the public hearing was published on April 9, 2015. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: None at this time. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. Prepared by: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Reviewed by: Nancy Deno, HR Director/Deputy City Manager Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Meeting: Economic Development Authority Meeting Date: April 6, 2015 Minutes: 3a UNOFFICIAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA MARCH 2, 2015 1. Call to Order President Mavity called the meeting to order at 7:20 p.m. Commissioners present: President Anne Mavity, Steve Hallfin, Jeff Jacobs, Gregg Lindberg, Susan Sanger, and Jake Spano. Commissioners absent: Tim Brausen. Staff present: Executive Director (Mr. Harmening) and Recording Secretary (Ms. Hughes). 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes 3a. Economic Development Authority Meeting Minutes February 2, 2015 The minutes were approved as presented. 4. Approval of Agenda The agenda was approved as presented. 5. Reports 5a. Approval of EDA Disbursements It was moved by Commissioner Lindberg, seconded by Commissioner Spano, to accept for filing EDA disbursements for the period January 24, 2015, through February 20, 2015. The motion passed 6-0 (Commissioner Brausen absent). 6. Old Business - None 7. New Business - None 8. Communications - None 9. Adjournment President Mavity adjourned the meeting at 7:21 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Secretary President Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 6, 2015 Consent Agenda Item: 5a EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Approval of EDA Disbursements RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to accept for filing EDA Disbursement Claims for the period of February 21, 2015 through March 27, 2015. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the EDA desire to approve EDA disbursements in accordance with Article V – Administration of Finances, of the EDA Bylaws? SUMMARY: The Accounting Division prepares this report on a monthly basis for the EDA to review and approve. The attached reports show both EDA disbursements paid by physical check and those by wire transfer or Automated Clearing House (ACH) when applicable. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Review and approval of the information follows the EDA’s Bylaws and provides another layer of oversight to further ensure fiscal stewardship. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: EDA Disbursements Prepared by: Connie Neubeck, Account Clerk Reviewed by: Brian A. Swanson, Controller 3/30/2015CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:55:12R55CKS2 LOGIS400 1Page -Council Check Summary - 3/27/20152/21/2015 Amount Vendor ObjectBU Description 82.50CAMPBELL KNUTSON PROF ASSOC WEST END TIF DIST G&A LEGAL SERVICES 148.50MILL CITY G&A LEGAL SERVICES 231.00 29,000.00CDW GOVERNMENT INC DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 29,000.00 219,736.67COB LLC HILLCREST (NESTLE REDEV PROJ)OTHER TECHNICAL SERVICES 219,736.67 4,000.75CODAMETRICSDEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A MEETING EXPENSE 4,000.75 15,000.00DMD PROPERTIES LLC MCGARVEY COFFEE SITE LAND HELD FOR RESALE 15,000.00 588.75EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC WEST END TIF DIST G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 588.75ELLIPSE ON EXC TIF DIST G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 105.00VICTORIA PONDS G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 588.75CSM TIF DIST G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 742.50MILL CITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 588.75PARK COMMONS G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 588.75EDGEWOOD TIF DIST G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 588.75ELMWOOD VILLAGE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 588.75WOLFE LAKE COMMERCIAL TIF G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 588.75AQUILA COMMONS G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 588.75HWY 7 BUSINESS CENTER G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 157.50HARD COAT G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6,303.75 5,000.00FRANZEN LAW & POLICY GROUP LLC HRA LEVY G&A LEGAL SERVICES 5,000.00 312.50GALLAGHER RISK MGMT SERVICES INC, ARTHURDEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 312.50 24.05KELLEY, RYAN DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A MEETING EXPENSE 24.05 3,053.00KENNEDY & GRAVEN MCGARVEY COFFEE SITE LEGAL SERVICES 90.00WEST END TIF DIST G&A LEGAL SERVICES Economic Development Authority Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approval of EDA Disbursements Page 2 3/30/2015CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:55:12R55CKS2 LOGIS400 2Page -Council Check Summary - 3/27/20152/21/2015 Amount Vendor ObjectBU Description 153.00DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A LEGAL SERVICES 2,175.00MILL CITY G&A LEGAL SERVICES 65.40WOODDALE POINTE LEGAL SERVICES 5,536.40 1,409.75LHB ENGINEERS & ARCHITECTS ELLIPSE II G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 693.00DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A PLANNING 1,200.00HARD COAT G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,302.75 3,000.00LOCKRIDGE GRINDAL NAUEN PLLP DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A LEGAL SERVICES 3,000.00 11.98OFFICE DEPOT DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A OFFICE SUPPLIES 11.98 15.34QUICKSILVER EXPRESS COURIER MCGARVEY COFFEE SITE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 15.34 46,132.55ST LOUIS PARK CONV & VISITORS BUREAU CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU COST REIMBURSEMENT-CVB 46,132.55 215.00ULI-THE URBRAN LAND INSTITUTE DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 215.00 71.74XCEL ENERGY 4601 HWY 7 PROP ACQUISITION HEATING GAS 71.74 Report Totals 337,894.48 Economic Development Authority Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approval of EDA Disbursements Page 3 Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 6, 2015 Presentation: 2a EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Recognition of Donation RECOMMENDED ACTION: Mayor to announce and give thanks and appreciation for the following donation being accepted at the meeting and listed on the Consent Agenda: From Amount For Donna Hill $50 Program supplies for Westwood Hills Nature Center Prepared by: Kay Midura, Office Assistant Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 6, 2015 Minutes: 3a UNOFFICIAL MINUTES CITY COUNCIL MEETING ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA MARCH 2, 2015 1. Call to Order Mayor Jacobs called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. Councilmembers present: Mayor Jeff Jacobs, Steve Hallfin, Gregg Lindberg, Anne Mavity, Susan Sanger, and Jake Spano. Councilmembers absent: Tim Brausen. Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), City Attorney (Mr. Mattick), Director of Engineering (Ms. Heiser), Senior Engineering Project Manager (Mr. Sullivan), Senior Planner (Mr. Walther), City Clerk (Ms. Stroth), Community Development Intern (Mr. Boyce), and Recording Secretary (Ms. Hughes). 1a. Pledge of Allegiance 1b. Roll Call 2. Presentations 2a. Recognition of Donations Mayor Jacobs expressed the City Council’s thanks to the Minnesota Society of Arboriculture for its donation up to $2,200 to allow Mr. Vaughan to attend the 2015 International Society of Arboriculture Conference in Orlando. He also expressed the City Council’s thanks to Discover St. Louis Park for its donation up to $1,650 to allow Mr. West to attend the 2015 National Association of Sports Commission Sports Event Symposium in Milwaukee. 2b. Recognition of Commissioner Tom Worthington Mayor Jacobs presented a Plaque of Appreciation to Parks and Recreation Advisory Commissioner Tom Worthington. He stated that Mr. Worthington’s commitment to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission has been exemplary and extended the City Council’s thanks to Mr. Worthington for his 14 years of service. 2c. Retirement Recognition Resolution for Inspector Manny Camilon Mayor Jacobs recited the Resolution recognizing the contributions of and expressing appreciation to Inspector Manny Camilon and presented a plaque to Mr. Camilon for his 37 years of service to the City. 3. Approval of Minutes City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 3a) Page 2 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of March 2, 2015 3a. Study Session Minutes February 9, 2015 The minutes were approved as presented. 3b. City Council Meeting Minutes February 17, 2015 The minutes were approved as presented. 3c. Special Study Session Meeting Minutes February 17, 2015 Councilmember Spano requested that the second sentence of the second full paragraph on page 2 be revised to state “He agreed that the data retention and data request issues could become onerous and if that is the case, the Police Department could decide to re-evaluate the use of body cameras based on cost step back from the use of body cameras because it is too expensive.” The minutes were approved as amended. 4. Approval of Agenda and Items on Consent Calendar NOTE: The Consent Calendar lists those items of business which are considered to be routine and/or which need no discussion. Consent items are acted upon by one motion. If discussion is desired by either a Councilmember or a member of the audience, that item may be moved to an appropriate section of the regular agenda for discussion. 4a. Accept for filing City Disbursement Claims for the period of January 24, 2015 through February 20, 2015. 4b. Moved to 8d. 4c. Motion to Adopt Resolution No. 15-026 to recognize Inspector Manny Camilon for his 37 years of service to the City of St. Louis Park. 4d. Adopt Resolution No. 15-027 authorizing the special assessment for the repair of the water service line at 3154 Hillsboro Avenue South, St. Louis Park, MN - P.I.D. 18- 117-21-22-0003. 4e. Adopt Resolution No. 15-028 to approve St. Louis Park Lions Club’s request for placing temporary signs in the public right-of-way. 4f. Adopt Resolution No. 15-029 authorizing final payment in the amount of $35,080.00 and accepting work for Fire Stations No. 1 and No. 2 Work Scope 14 (Tile) for Project Nos. 2008-3001 and 2008-3002, City Contract No. 75-11. 4g. Adopt Resolution No. 15-030 approving acceptance of a monetary donation from the Minnesota Society of Arboriculture in an amount not to exceed $2,200 for all related expenses, for Jim Vaughan, Environmental Coordinator, to attend the 2015 International Society of Arboriculture Conference in Orlando, Florida. City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 3a) Page 3 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of March 2, 2015 4h. Adopt Resolution No. 15-031 approving acceptance of a donation from Discover St. Louis Park for registration, hotel, airfare and cab fare for Jason West, Recreation Superintendent to attend the 2015 National Association of Sports Commission (“NASC”) Sports Event Symposium held April 26-30, 2015, in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, in an approximate amount not to exceed $1,650. 4i. Adopt Resolution No. 15-032 appointing Patrick Noon as Alternate Commissioner, and Erick Francis as the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) member to the Basset Creek Watershed Management Commission (BCWMC) to serve terms expiring on January 31, 2017. 4j. Adopt Resolution No. 15-033 Supporting Dedicated State Funding for City Streets. 4k. Approve for filing Telecommunications Advisory Commission meeting minutes of December 9, 2014. Councilmember Spano requested that Consent Calendar item #4b be removed and placed on the Regular Agenda. It was moved by Councilmember Mavity, seconded by Councilmember Sanger, to approve the Agenda and items listed on the Consent Calendar as amended to move Consent Calendar item #4b to the Regular Agenda as item #8d; and to waive reading of all resolutions and ordinances. The motion passed 6-0 (Councilmember Brausen absent). 5. Boards and Commissions - None 6. Public Hearings 6a. Public Hearing/Project Report: 2015 Connect the Park! Mr. Sullivan presented the staff report and proposed 2015 Connect the Park! projects consisting of seventeen sidewalk and trail segments at a total cost of approximately $1.85 million. He described the proposed sidewalk segments near Flag Avenue, 18th Street, Hillsboro Avenue, and 14th Street and noted that this area is also scheduled for construction as part of this year’s Pavement Management project. He also discussed the proposed sidewalk segments around Louisiana Oaks Park and the proposed 32nd Street trail improvements. He then described the proposed additions to the plan based on discussions with Council intended to fill gaps and create continuous connections. Mayor Jacobs stated that Council would not be taking action this evening and is deferring action on this item until March 16, 2015. He then opened the public hearing. Mr. Marc Friedman, 9321 West 18th Street, expressed concern about the number of large trees that would be removed and stated these trees create a canopy and is a big reason why they came to the Crestview neighborhood, adding he felt that home values would be negatively affected. He was also concerned about the poor timing of this project given the Highway 100 reconstruction project and additional traffic on 169 causing drivers to cut through onto Flag Avenue and asked Council to consider deferring construction until 2017 if it is decided to move forward with this project. City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 3a) Page 4 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of March 2, 2015 Ms. Nancy Gores, 3929 Kipling Avenue South, stated she has been a resident for 29 years and on the School Board for 11 years and wished to speak as a resident and as one member of the School Board. She thanked the City Council for doing its best to add sidewalks, to listen to its neighbors, and to mitigate impacts and believed that sidewalks serve the greater good. Mr. Alaric Poseley-Hatton, 2030 Texas Avenue South, stated he would like to see a sidewalk along his side of the street and was not concerned about how much of his yard would be sacrificed. He stated that the closest crosswalk is at Cedar Lake Road or Wayzata Boulevard and he has seen many close calls from people jaywalking and encouraged the City to put in the sidewalk for the safety of the kids. Ms. Darlene Olson, 1309 Westwood Hills Road, stated her opposition to the sidewalk on the west side of Texas and felt the proposed sidewalk was redundant and destructive to the landscape. She expressed concern about the amount of mature trees that would be removed and greatly change the appearance of Texas Avenue. She stated there are several areas with 3-4’ changes in elevation that would result in substantial excavation and retaining walls, adding this is an expensive project that is not needed. Mr. Gerald Neuman, 1426 Flag Avenue South, agreed with the earlier comments and stated he was not in favor of the proposed sidewalk. Mr. James Poulter, 1631 Fairway Lane, stated he appreciated all the work done by staff and for working tirelessly with residents. He stated the proposed sidewalk would cut through his neighborhood and then dead end. He stated the construction would be an added disruption due to the congestion from the Highway 100 reconstruction and asked Council to consider that this is an area where new sound barriers were installed to mitigate noise from Highway 169 and now the City would be cutting down mature trees that represent a natural sound barrier for the area. Ms. Judy Voigt, 1603 Utah Drive South, stated she understood the desire to get kids off of the busy street but the trees create oxygen and clean the air and she knows the City wants to be a leader in sustainability. She requested that Council consider the “Living Streets” program in Maplewood that incorporates trees, rain gardens, sidewalks, and bike lanes, especially on Texas Avenue and felt this could be a model for the City. Mr. Terry Gips, 9000 West 28th Street, stated he appreciated the work done by Council and staff to support Connect the Park! and Health in the Park. He stated he walks his kids to Cedar Manor School and it is dangerous because of distracted drivers or drivers swerving out of the way, adding this has been an issue in their neighborhood for a long time. He felt it would be difficult and expensive to put in a sidewalk because of the steep embankment and all of the snow being removed from 169 would end up on the sidewalk, making it useless. He suggested that the roadway be narrowed to create a 4’ bike/pedestrian path, adding they feel this would be inexpensive and would like to include it in the 2015 plan. Mr. Brad Bream, 3836 Glenhurst Avenue, stated the proposed sidewalk on the 3800 block covers three homes on Glenhurst at a cost of approximately $75,000 or $330 per foot, which is approximately six times the normal cost of a sidewalk and he found this City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 3a) Page 5 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of March 2, 2015 cost to be excessive and part of Council’s job is to use funds appropriately. He stated his strong opposition to the sidewalk on Glenhurst and indicated the other two homes are also strongly opposed due to the destructive impact to their front yards. He stated the City proposes to construct a 3’ retaining wall starting in the middle of his yard and he has an existing retaining wall that runs perpendicular to the street and the City is recommending that the end of that wall be cut off and turned at 90 degrees to run parallel to the street and then extend directly into his neighbor’s yard. He stated all three homes have limestone facing and the retaining wall proposed by the City does not match the limestone. He was concerned that the replacement driveway would not match his existing concrete driveway and was also concerned that the tree in his front yard would be at risk. He stated the proposed sidewalk would run downhill at a significant slope that faces south and he was concerned about icy conditions from snow melting and freezing on the sidewalk thus creating an unsafe sidewalk. He stated it was his understanding that all three homeowners are legally liable for anyone who slips and falls on that sidewalk. He stated that Councilmember Mavity indicated the reason for the proposed sidewalk is because Susan Lindgren School wants to see more sidewalks, but the fact is that all the children on Glenhurst are bused to Susan Lindgren School. He stated the City is proposing to fill a small gap that is going to be destructive and expensive and all three homes are strongly opposed. He also requested that Councilmember Mavity not participate in the vote because she lives on the block and is not objective on this matter. Councilmember Hallfin requested comment from the City Attorney about the liability question raised by Mr. Bream. Mr. Mattick advised that generally speaking, this is the City’s sidewalk and the City’s liability related to maintenance and repair. Councilmember Mavity asked if any Councilmembers needed to recuse themselves from voting. Mr. Mattick replied that in his opinion, none of the Councilmembers needed to recuse themselves from voting. Mr. Tom Stutsman, 3830 Glenhurst, felt it was absurd to pay $75,000 for this sidewalk. He stated the canopy in the City is disappearing and the City wants to take out more trees, adding that the maple tree in his yard will likely die. He suggested installing a sidewalk on the other side of the street that is built up to the curb. Mr. Sean Barrett, 3543 Rhode Island Avenue South, presented several pictures to Council and stated the planned sidewalk is going to cut off a good portion of his yard, adding he was not totally against it but would like to see something that benefits them and suggested moving the sidewalk to the other side of the utility pole and reducing the width to reduce damage to his yard. Ms. Lauren Grouws, 2340 Sumter Avenue, questioned the need for sidewalks on both sides of Texas Avenue and asked if user counts were done. She was concerned about tree removal and referenced City Code language about tree replacement. She was concerned about spacing of trees and protection of trees and referenced City Code language about placement of drip lines on significant trees, adding it did not appear there was any way City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 3a) Page 6 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of March 2, 2015 the City could construct the sidewalk because the drip line would cover the construction area. She asked that the City defer this sidewalk on the west side of Texas Avenue because the City cannot meet its ordinance standards for protecting and replacing trees. Mr. George Gianoulis, 1600 Hillsboro Avenue South, recited his letter to Councilmember Brausen and stated they were attracted to the Crestview neighborhood because of the mature trees and putting in a sidewalk will change the character of their neighborhood. He stated he did not want to take on the added responsibility for snow removal on the sidewalk. He stated the proposed sidewalk would remove the silver maple tree that shades their house in the summer and he wondered about the environmental soundness of removing a tree and the runoff caused by concrete being added. He stated it was his understanding that the Westmoreland sidewalk was removed from the plan and he felt they should be able to opt out of the plan as well. Mr. Brian Kelly, 1811 Hillsboro Avenue, agreed with the previous comments and stated the sidewalk is not needed. Mr. Laxmana Godishels, 9435 West 14th Street, stated most residents in his neighborhood are not interested in a sidewalk and are concerned about losing mature trees. Mr. Jeff Gust, 1426 Hillsboro Avenue, stated he was against the proposed sidewalk and was concerned about losing his tree. He stated the only safety thing their neighborhood needs is the addition of a speed bump because nobody stops at either of the stop signs. Mr. Robert McChane, 8000 Westwood Hills Drive, stated they are in favor of the sidewalk. He stated Texas Avenue is quite busy and people do not adhere to the speed limit and they are concerned about safety and while losing trees would be less than ideal, they feel that City staff are doing everything they can to prevent loss of trees. Ms. Sara Bergen, 2939 Princeton Avenue South, thanked staff and Council for all their work and stated they support the Connect the Park! initiative. She pointed out that the land that the sidewalks go on is land owned by the City and offered by easement to homeowners and it is up to the residents to decide what type of city they want and the connections they want for their families to safely transport themselves. Ms. Jena Bjorgen, 4281 Ottawa Avenue South, thanked staff and Council for its work in putting the Connect the Park! plan in place. She referenced a petition and letter of support from the principal at Susan Lindgren along with a letter of support from the Susan Lindgren PTSO supporting implementation of sidewalks in the Minnekahda Vista neighborhood. She stated the PTSO is actively encouraging kids to walk and bike to school whether they take the bus or not and they have implemented the Safe Routes to Schools program to enable and encourage children to walk and bike to school. Ms. Jodi Lindskog, 2336 Sumter Avenue South, stated they are active users of the sidewalk system and already use the sidewalk on Texas and would like to see some of this money put into fixing the existing sidewalk and putting in usable crosswalks. She stated this would make the area safer and would save the tree cover. City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 3a) Page 7 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of March 2, 2015 Mr. John Hiner, 4000 Quentin, questioned the need for the sidewalk on 40th and stated he will lose six trees and the sidewalk will be very close to his house. Ms. Martha Takata, 3601 Quebec, stated that sidewalks are great but was concerned about the impact to her yard and how close it would be to her dining room window. She stated she did not understand the need for a sidewalk on the south side and felt that people could walk on the north side of Walker. Mayor Jacobs closed the public hearing. He thanked all the residents for attending and providing comments this evening. He encouraged residents to call if they have further questions or would like to provide comments. Mayor Jacobs recessed the City Council meeting at 8:54 p.m. and reconvened the City Council meeting at 8:56 p.m. 7. Requests, Petitions, and Communications from the Public – None 8. Resolutions, Ordinances, Motions and Discussion Items 8a. Project Report: Pavement Management Project – Area 3 – Project #4015- 1003. Resolution No. 15-034. Mr. Sullivan presented the staff report and explained the proposed 2015 project in Area 3 totaling approximately $3.2 million. He noted that Area A includes sidewalk construction and if the project report is accepted, the sidewalk construction is proposed to be included as a bid alternate so that staff may continue to develop the plans and specifications and get the project out for bid without making a final decision on the sidewalk component at this time. Councilmember Mavity asked about the access from Highway 169 and Mn/DOT’s requested closure of 16th Street. Mr. Sullivan explained that Mn/DOT’s current proposal is to leave open the 16th Street exit for the northbound lanes of Hwy. 169, however it is expected that closure of 16th Street will be re-evaluated in the future. Councilmember Mavity stated that this is one of the areas where traffic will end up due to the Highway 100 reconstruction project and questioned the timing of this particular pavement management project at a time when there will be additional traffic in the area. Mr. Sullivan indicated that the pavement in this area needs improvement and the water main needs to be addressed. He stated this area will not be traversable when construction begins and this will stem the cut-through traffic in the area. It was moved by Councilmember Hallfin, seconded by Councilmember Lindberg, to adopt Resolution No. 15-034 Accepting the Project Report, Establishing Improvement Project No. 4015-1003 Approving Plans and Specifications, and Authorizing Advertisement for Bids for Improvement Project No. 4015-1003. The motion passed 6-0 (Councilmember Brausen absent). City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 3a) Page 8 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of March 2, 2015 8b. Methodist Hospital Expansion – Major Amendment to PUD. Resolution No. 15-035. Mr. Walther presented the staff report and explained that Park Nicollet has proposed a 58,869 square foot addition to Methodist Hospital. The plan would add two floors to the east side of the building, a one story addition on the west side of the campus for surgery center improvements, and a 200 square foot addition on the third floor connecting the Meadowbrook Building to the Cancer Center. He noted that a portion of the stair tower and storage on the first floor of the surgery center improvements will be located within the floodplain with 77 cubic yards of fill and excavation that will add 122 cubic yards, so the compensatory flood storage requirements are met or exceeded. He presented several renderings of the project that is intended for patient room modernization and noted the addition does not add any additional beds to the hospital. He stated the applicant has requested a height modification for the east side expansion and explained the maximum height allowed is 45’ within 100’ of a residential district and the eight-story tower of the hospital has already been granted approval to exceed the height limit of the RC zoning district. He stated the portion within 100’ of the residential area would be higher than normally allowed and the neighborhood met with the hospital and there was some discussion about whether the building could be stepped back but there are some structural limitations to doing so; in addition, there were some practical difficulties creating ongoing staffing efficiency issues. He stated that staff also reviewed potential shadow impacts and found no violations of the Ordinance. Mr. Robert Riesselman, Park Nicollet Director of Engineering, thanked the City for supporting their projects. He stated the proposed addition is intended to modernize and create private rooms to assist with infection control, promote healing, and provide more space for families and care teams. He stated they have the support of the neighbors and have worked hard to be a good neighbor. Councilmember Spano stated that Mr. Riesselman and his team have been very good about listening to resident concerns and have always been willing to address those concerns. He requested further information about the curtain wall material on the east tower vertical expansion and expressed concern about glass material reflecting into the bedrooms of the residential district and asked how the light impact would be mitigated. Mr. Matt Sanders, consulting architect, stated they tried to model the sun angles as best they could and shared this with the neighborhood. He stated that the location where the glass starts is about 45’ up in the air and the houses are not more than 18’ tall. He indicated they are in the process of selecting the glass material and intend to include non- reflective glass and they are also looking at technology that exists to reduce impacts. It was moved by Councilmember Mavity, seconded by Councilmember Spano, to adopt Resolution No. 15-035 Amending and Restating Nos. 03-174, 07-083, 07-165, 08-077 and 14-169 and Approving a Major Amendment to a Final Planned Unit Development under Section 36-367 of the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code Relating to Zoning for Building Additions on Property Zoned R-C Multi-Family Residential located at 6500 Excelsior Boulevard – Methodist Hospital. The motion passed 6-0 (Councilmember Brausen absent). City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 3a) Page 9 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of March 2, 2015 8c. Meadowbrook Golf Course Rezoning Mr. Walther introduced Mr. Alex Boyce, Community Development Intern. Mr. Boyce presented the staff report and background information regarding the site location and stated the majority of the site is located within the FEMA floodplain and owned by the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board. He stated the site is proposed to be rezoned to Parks and Open Space (POS) because this more closely aligns with the current use of the property and rezoning the site would maintain consistency with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan which guides the site as POS. It was moved by Councilmember Hallfin, seconded by Councilmember Mavity, to approve First Reading of Ordinance Amending the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code Changing Boundaries of Zoning Districts – Meadowbrook Golf Course. The motion passed 6-0 (Councilmember Brausen absent). 8d. Approve Premises Amendment to the On-Sale Brewer’s Taproom and Off- Sale Brewer Malt Liquor Licenses for Steel Toe Brewing, LLC, located at 4848 35th Street West Councilmember Spano requested further information about the timing of Steel Toe Brewing’s planned expansion. Ms. Stroth stated that Steel Toe Brewing has entered into a lease for the additional building space and is waiting for Council approval before beginning construction. It was moved by Councilmember Mavity, seconded by Councilmember Spano, to approve premises amendment to the on-sale brewer’s taproom and off-sale brewer malt liquor licenses for Steel Toe Brewing, LLC, located at 4848 35th Street West. The motion passed 6-0 (Councilmember Brausen absent). 9. Communications Mayor Jacobs extended condolences to Julie Sweitzer and her family on the sudden passing of her husband. He reminded residents about the “Writers Riot” event on Thursday, March 5, at 7:30 p.m. at Granite City. He reminded residents about the March Foodshare Campaign and encouraged residents to donate to STEP. He stated the Police Department is in the process of setting up neighborhood meetings and residents may contact their neighborhood leader or Brianna Erickson at City Hall with any questions. Councilmember Hallfin reminded residents about the Children First fundraiser breakfast on Thursday, March 5, at 7:00 a.m. at the Doubletree Hotel. He stated seats are still available and further information is available on the website. Mr. Harmening advised that the City has declared a snow emergency at 4:00 a.m. on Tuesday, March 3rd, and encouraged residents to move their vehicles off the street. 10. Adjournment Mayor Jacobs adjourned the meeting at 9:38 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Nancy Stroth, City Clerk Jeff Jacobs, Mayor Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 6, 2015 Minutes: 3b UNOFFICIAL MINUTES SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING CLOSED EXECUTIVE SESSION ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA MARCH 23, 2015 1. Call to Order Mayor Jacobs called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. Councilmembers present: Mayor Jeff Jacobs, Tim Brausen, Steve Hallfin, Gregg Lindberg, Anne Mavity, Susan Sanger, and Jake Spano. Councilmembers absent: None. Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), City Attorney (Mr. Scott), and Director of Operations and Recreation (Ms. Walsh). 1a. Roll Call 2. Closed Executive Session 2a. Closed Session to Discuss Potential Offer to Purchase Real Property Located at 40th Street and France Ave. currently owned by the City of Minneapolis The City Council met in closed executive session to discuss a potential offer to purchase real property located at 40th Street and France Avenue currently owned by the City of Minneapolis. Mayor Jacobs adjourned the meeting at 7:06 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Nancy Stroth, City Clerk Jeff Jacobs, Mayor Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 6, 2015 Consent Agenda Item: 4a EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Approval of City Disbursements RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to accept for filing City Disbursement Claims for the period of Febuary 21, 2015 through March 27, 2015. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council desire to approve City disbursements in accordance with Section 6.11 – Disbursements – How Made, of the City’s Charter? SUMMARY: The Accounting Division prepares this report on a monthly basis for the City Council to review and approve. The attached reports show both City disbursements paid by physical check and those by wire transfer or Automated Clearing House (ACH) when applicable. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Review and approval of the information follows the City’s Charter and provides another layer of oversight to further ensure fiscal stewardship. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: City Disbursements Prepared by: Connie Neubeck, Account Clerk Reviewed by: Brian A. Swanson, Controller 3/30/2015CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:52:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400 1Page -Council Check Summary - 3/27/20152/21/2015 Amount Vendor ObjectBU Description 17.47A-1 OUTDOOR POWER INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 186.71TREE MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 204.18 152.38ABERNATHY, LISA ORGANIZED REC G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 152.38 223.56ABLE HOSE & RUBBER INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 223.56 2,104.92ABRA MN ST LOUIS PARK UNINSURED LOSS G&A UNINSURED LOSS 2,104.92 225.00ACACIA ARCHITECTS LLC MOVE-UP PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 225.00 112.75ACCUITY INC WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 112.75SEWER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 112.75SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES 112.75STORM WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 451.00 80,407.80ADVANCED DISPOSAL SERVICES SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS YARD WASTE SERVICE 4,366.96SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL YARD WASTE SERVICE 84,774.76 285.00ADVANTAGE AUTO GLASS INC GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 285.00 4,437.00AIRWATCH LLC TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 4,437.00 225.00ALBERTSSON HANSEN ARCHITECTURE LTD MOVE-UP PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 225.00 1,190.00ALEX AIR APPARATUS INC OPERATIONS REPAIRS 1,190.00 450.00ALLIANCE FOR INNOVATION ADMINISTRATION G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 1,350.00HEALTH IN THE PARK INITIATIVE TRAINING 1,800.00 City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 2 3/30/2015CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:52:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400 2Page -Council Check Summary - 3/27/20152/21/2015 Amount Vendor ObjectBU Description 1,612.00ALLIANCE MECH SRVCS INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 1,492.00PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,104.00 195.00AMEMOPERATIONSSUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 195.00 79.48AMERICAN MESSAGING CELLPHONES, IPADS, ETC.TELEPHONE 79.48 541.00AMERICAN TIRE DISTRIBUTORS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 541.00 3,540.00ANDERSEN INC, EARL INSTALLATION OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 3,540.00 63.55ANDERSEN, JENS OPERATIONS SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 63.55 120.00AOL LEGAL DEPT POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 120.00 571.60APACHE GROUP OF MINNESOTA REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES 571.60 9,135.00APPLE INC TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 9,135.00 4,400.00AQUATIC RECREATION CO SPLASH PAD MAINT - Oak Hill Pk OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,400.00 154.65ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES FACILITIES MCTE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 86.92GENERAL CUSTODIAL DUTIES OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 53.51REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES 295.08 168.61ARCPRINTING/REPRO SERVICES EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 38.70WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 38.72SEWER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 38.72SOLID WASTE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 3 3/30/2015CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:52:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400 3Page -Council Check Summary - 3/27/20152/21/2015 Amount Vendor ObjectBU Description 284.75 355.12ASET SUPPLY AND PAPER INC REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES 355.12 13,009.50ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 593.31ROUTINE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT PARTS 13,602.81 18,807.72ASPEN MILLS OPERATIONS UNIFORMS 18,807.72 272.32AT&T MOBILITY CELLPHONES, IPADS, ETC.OFFICE EQUIPMENT 272.32 1,219.02ATIR ELECTRIC CORPORATION FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 1,161.72MUNICIPAL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 2,380.74 61.84ATOMIC RECYCLING PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 61.83WATER UTILITY G&A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 272.33VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 396.00 743.04AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS INC WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 743.04 65.79AUTOMOBILE SERVICE GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 65.79 644.00AVEX LLC HEALTH IN THE PARK INITIATIVE GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 644.00 270.00AVI SYSTEMS INC CABLE TV G & A OFFICE EQUIPMENT 270.00 7,500.00B CUBED LLC ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 7,500.00 212.50BAILEY, CHRIS GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 212.50 City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 4 3/30/2015CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:52:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400 4Page -Council Check Summary - 3/27/20152/21/2015 Amount Vendor ObjectBU Description 65.30BALVIN, AARON DARE PROGRAM TRAVEL/MEETINGS 65.30 18.98BARNA, GUZY & STEFFEN LTD HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 18.98 261.16BARRETT, TIM POLICE G & A TRAVEL/MEETINGS 261.16 1,609.00BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 519.63ARENA MAINTENANCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 2,128.63 2,991.38BEDFORD TECHNOLOGY LLC PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 2,991.38 262.50BENUS, SUSAN GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 262.50 225.00BERGFORD ARCHITECTURE, JOHN MOVE-UP PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 225.00 212.50BERTHIAUME, BRUCE GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 212.50 6,269.47BLOOMINGTON, CITY OF REILLY BUDGET OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6,269.47 850.00BLUE CARD-HENNEPIN CTY FIRE CHIEFS ASSN OPERATIONS TRAINING 850.00 89.30BLUE TARP FINANCIAL INC GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 67.98SWEEPINGEQUIPMENT PARTS 157.28 864.00BOHN WELDING INC PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 20.00PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 80.00ARENA MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 964.00 City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 5 3/30/2015CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:52:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400 5Page -Council Check Summary - 3/27/20152/21/2015 Amount Vendor ObjectBU Description 5,000.00BOLLIG, BLAIR ESCROWS DEMO / BROOKSIDE TRAFFIC 5,000.00 3,418.50BOLTON & MENK INC ENGINEERING G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 33,378.85STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 59,777.00STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 96,574.35 54.76BOUND TREE MEDICAL, LLC OPERATIONS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 54.76 241.79BOYER TRUCK PARTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 1,849.04GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 2,090.83 2,177.70BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,177.70 516.00BRIDGEWALK CONDO ASSOCIATION GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET CLEARING ACCOUNT 516.00 197.00BRO TEX INC ROUTINE MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 384.00SEWER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 581.00 75.00BROOKSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING REHAB BALANCE SHEET CONTRACTS PAYABLE 75.00 408.00BROWN TRAFFIC PRODUCTS SYSTEM REPAIR OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 408.00 100.00BROWNDALE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION HOUSING REHAB BALANCE SHEET CONTRACTS PAYABLE 100.00 553.84BURRELL TRUSTEE, GREGORY A EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S WAGE GARNISHMENTS 553.84 250.00BUTLER, LAURENCE GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 250.00 186.30CAIN, DAVE SEWER UTILITY G&A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 6 3/30/2015CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:52:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400 6Page -Council Check Summary - 3/27/20152/21/2015 Amount Vendor ObjectBU Description 186.30 3,770.00CALHOUN PLAZA INC SPEC ASSMT CONSTRUCTION CURRENT 3,770.00 741.00CALHOUN TOWERS APTS OPERATIONS RADIO COMMUNICATIONS 741.00 17,998.46CAMPBELL KNUTSON PROF ASSOC ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL SERVICES 660.00STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A LEGAL SERVICES 990.00WATER UTILITY G&A LEGAL SERVICES 99.00REILLY G & A LEGAL SERVICES 19,747.46 145.26CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY WATER UTILITY G&A LICENSES 145.26 9.99CAPITAL ONE COMMERCIAL WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 9.99 410.61CARDIAC SCIENCE INC OPERATIONS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 410.61 13,859.81CARGILL INC SANDING/SALTING OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 13,859.81 500.00CARTEGRAPH SYSTEMS INC IT G & A OFFICE EQUIPMENT 13,335.57WATER UTILITY G&A OFFICE EQUIPMENT 13,335.56SEWER UTILITY G&A OFFICE EQUIPMENT 13,335.57TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 40,506.70 53,279.93CDW GOVERNMENT INC TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 53,279.93 2,500.00CEL PUBLIC RELATIONS INC ENVIRONMENTAL G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,500.00 1,325.08CENTER ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT DISCOUNT LOAN PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6,405.00MOVE-UP PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 50,000.00TRANSFORMATION LOAN OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 7 3/30/2015CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:52:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400 7Page -Council Check Summary - 3/27/20152/21/2015 Amount Vendor ObjectBU Description 57,730.08 6,261.33CENTERPOINT ENERGY FACILITY OPERATIONS HEATING GAS 5,839.64WATER UTILITY G&A HEATING GAS 407.18REILLY G & A HEATING GAS 173.47SEWER UTILITY G&A ELECTRIC SERVICE 257.24SEWER UTILITY G&A HEATING GAS 1,419.28PARK MAINTENANCE G & A HEATING GAS 205.27WESTWOOD G & A HEATING GAS 269.24NATURALIST PROGRAMMER HEATING GAS 14,832.65 9,718.67CENTERPOINT ENERGY SERVICES INC FACILITY OPERATIONS HEATING GAS 18,122.35REC CENTER BUILDING HEATING GAS 27,841.02 10,160.00CENTRAL PENSION FUND EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S OTHER RETIREMENT 10,160.00 261.60CENTURY LINK CELLPHONES, IPADS, ETC.TELEPHONE 261.60 380.00CHET'S SHOES INC PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 1,089.99WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 200.00SEWER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 123.99SOLID WASTE G&A OTHER 494.00PARK MAINTENANCE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 412.00REC CENTER/AQUATIC PARK SAL OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 871.00VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 3,570.98 28.32CINTAS CORPORATION FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 232.35FACILITIES MCTE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 283.29WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 452.65VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 996.61 144.89CITIZENS INDEPENDENT BANK GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 465.00ADMINISTRATION G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 175.00ADMINISTRATION G & A TRAINING 1,347.21ADMINISTRATION G & A MEETING EXPENSE City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 8 3/30/2015CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:52:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400 8Page -Council Check Summary - 3/27/20152/21/2015 Amount Vendor ObjectBU Description 19.06HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL SUPPLIES 110.00HUMAN RESOURCES ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT 447.95HUMAN RESOURCES RECOGNITION 254.00HUMAN RESOURCES SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 233.55HUMAN RESOURCES MEETING EXPENSE 6.37COMM & MARKETING G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 433.20COMM & MARKETING G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 787.97COMM & MARKETING G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 247.00IT G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 367.31IT G & A OFFICE EQUIPMENT 50.00IT G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,074.58IT G & A TRAINING 4.00IT G & A TRAVEL/MEETINGS 1,239.00ASSESSING G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 602.00ASSESSING G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 505.00FINANCE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 579.00FINANCE G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 340.03COMM DEV PLANNING G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 794.57FACILITIES MCTE G & A BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 80.60POLICE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 37.12POLICE G & A OFFICE EQUIPMENT 182.74POLICE G & A POLICE EQUIPMENT 27.26POLICE G & A POSTAGE 1,222.64POLICE G & A TRAINING 232.34POLICE G & A MEETING EXPENSE 131.83DARE PROGRAM OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 266.34DARE PROGRAM TRAINING 1,213.44TRAFFIC CONTROL TRAINING 150.00SUPERVISORYSUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 276.70RANGEOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 761.13OPERATIONSGENERAL SUPPLIES 560.00OPERATIONSFIRE PREVENTION SUPPLIES 1,348.84OPERATIONSOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 149.95OPERATIONSSUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 2,346.33OPERATIONSTRAINING 652.38OPERATIONSSEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 37.12INSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,546.25ENGINEERING G & A TRAINING 48.27PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 140.73PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 47.14TV PRODUCTION GENERAL SUPPLIES City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 9 3/30/2015CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:52:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400 9Page -Council Check Summary - 3/27/20152/21/2015 Amount Vendor ObjectBU Description 350.00TV PRODUCTION SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 215.00WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 350.00WATER UTILITY G&A TRAINING 140.74SEWER UTILITY G&A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SUPPLY 1,725.00SEWER UTILITY G&A TRAINING 609.81STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 351.98TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 160.00ORGANIZED REC G & A TRAINING 125.86HOLIDAY PROGRAMS GENERAL SUPPLIES 71.53WARMING HOUSES GENERAL SUPPLIES 154.48PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 140.74PARK MAINTENANCE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 219.57PARK MAINTENANCE G & A TRAINING 117.39ENVIRONMENTAL G & A TRAINING 552.58WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 165.00REC CENTER BUILDING SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 60.00REC CENTER BUILDING LICENSES 436.20ARENA MAINTENANCE SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 10.53VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 140.73VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 264.00VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A TRAINING 28,046.98 386.00CLAREY'S SAFETY EQUIPMENT INC OPERATIONS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 386.00 16,982.32COLICH & ASSOCIATES ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL SERVICES 16,982.32 92.12COMCASTOPERATIONSEMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 15.85OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 268.55WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 9.02REC CENTER BUILDING EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 385.54 7,266.51COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP SUB HENN EMERGENCY REPAIR GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 7,266.51 22,144.21COMPASS MINERALS AMERICA SANDING/SALTING OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 22,144.21 City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 10 3/30/2015CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:52:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400 10Page -Council Check Summary - 3/27/20152/21/2015 Amount Vendor ObjectBU Description 110.00COSTCO WHOLESALE MEMBERSHIP ORGANIZED REC G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 110.00WESTWOOD G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 220.00 219.00COUNSELING CARE POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 219.00 20,306.00COVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 20,306.00 95.00COVERT TRACK GROUP INC POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 95.00 132.15CROWN MARKING INC COMM & MARKETING G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 59.20IT G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 191.35 109.63CUB FOODS POLICE G & A SUBSISTENCE SUPPLIES 109.63 577.80CULVER COMPANY WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 577.80 1,035.50CUMMINS NPOWER LLC FACILITIES MCTE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 812.87REC CENTER BUILDING EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 1,848.37 198.00D&T APPLIANCE SERVICE CO FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 198.00 4,128.39DALCO ENTERPRISES INC GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SUPPLY 4,128.39 7,085.00DALE TILE COMPANY GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS BAL S RETAINED PERCENTAGE 27,995.00GO BONDS-FIRE STATIONS G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 35,080.00 44.28DELEGARD TOOL CO GENERAL REPAIR SMALL TOOLS 44.28 879.64DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 11 3/30/2015CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:52:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400 11Page -Council Check Summary - 3/27/20152/21/2015 Amount Vendor ObjectBU Description 879.64 3,974.92DEPT LABOR & INDUSTRY INSPECTIONS G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 3,974.92 293.25DEX MEDIA EAST LLC ENTERPRISE G & A ADVERTISING 293.25 38.00DISCOUNT STEEL INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 178.00TREE MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 216.00 1,275.00DJ ELECTRIC SERVICES INC REC CENTER BUILDING BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 488.85ARENA MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 2,000.00AQUATIC PARK BUDGET BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 2,500.00AQUATIC PARK BUDGET EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 6,263.85 2,500.00DLO EXCAVATING ESCROWS INGLEWOOD AVE - WOLSON 2,500.00 15,098.38DLT SOLUTIONS INC ENGINEERING G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 15,098.38 6,829.25DO-GOOD.BIZ INC COMM & MARKETING G & A POSTAGE 608.16NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH POSTAGE 7,437.41 30.00DUBE, JIM INSPECTIONS G & A TRAINING 30.00 234.58ECM PUBLISHERS INC ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL NOTICES 665.00HEALTH IN THE PARK INITIATIVE PRINTING & PUBLISHING 262.82STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A LEGAL NOTICES 240.38STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 1,402.78 332.06EDEN PRAIRIE WINLECTRIC DAMAGE REPAIR OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 332.06 499.00EDUCATION & TRAINING SERVICES WATER UTILITY G&A TRAINING City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 12 3/30/2015CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:52:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400 12Page -Council Check Summary - 3/27/20152/21/2015 Amount Vendor ObjectBU Description 499.00 576.25EGAN COMPANIES INC SYSTEM REPAIR OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 456.00WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 1,032.25 666.25EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC ADMINISTRATION G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,500.00PPL LA CRT/SHALLOW RENT SUBSID OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 666.25PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,832.50 3,777.40ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIR UNINSURED LOSS G&A UNINSURED LOSS 3,777.40 332.22EMERGENCY APPARATUS MTNCE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 332.22 23,891.25EMPLOYEE STRATEGIES INC ADMINISTRATION G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 900.00ADMINISTRATION G & A TRAINING 24,791.25 225.00ENCORE BROKERS IT G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 225.00 2,350.24ENVIROTECH SERVICES INC SANDING/SALTING OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 2,350.24 562.15EVIDENT CRIME SCENE PRODUCTS POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 49.00POLICE G & A POSTAGE 611.15 3,564.07EXACTBYTE INC COMM & MARKETING G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,564.07 960.92FACTORY MOTOR PARTS CO GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 17.82GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES 978.74 15.29FASTENAL COMPANY PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 15.29 City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 13 3/30/2015CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:52:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400 13Page -Council Check Summary - 3/27/20152/21/2015 Amount Vendor ObjectBU Description 82.22FEINBERG, GREG WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 82.22 2,683.66FERGUSON WATERWORKS WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 2,683.66 524.20FERRELLGASICE RESURFACER MOTOR FUELS 524.20 249.00FINANCE & COMMERCE ADMINISTRATION G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 249.00 5,859.50FINE PROPERTIES OF MN LLP WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 5,859.50 302.25FIRESIDE HEARTH & HOME PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 302.25 525.00FISCHLER & ASSOCIATES PA COMMUNICATIONS/GV REIMBURSEABL GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 525.00 600.00FLEX COMPENSATION INC EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 600.00 26.97FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 39.36PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 66.33 145.85G S DIRECT ENGINEERING G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 145.85 6,000.00GALA HOMES ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 6,000.00 937.50GALLAGHER RISK MGMT SERVICES INC, ARTHURFINANCE G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 312.50CABLE TV G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 312.50HOUSING REHAB G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 312.50WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 312.50SEWER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 312.50SOLID WASTE G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 312.50STORM WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 14 3/30/2015CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:52:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400 14Page -Council Check Summary - 3/27/20152/21/2015 Amount Vendor ObjectBU Description 2,812.50 250.00GAS TANK RENU/RADIATOR WEST GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 250.00 3,973.14GLTC PREMIUM PAYMENTS EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S LONG TERM CARE INSUR 3,973.14 232.00GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 232.00 84.86GRAINGER INC, WW GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 226.50GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 816.80WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 334.09WATER UTILITY G&A SMALL TOOLS 118.28REC CENTER BUILDING EQUIPMENT PARTS 101.46VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,681.99 622.71GRANITE LEDGE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS WIRING REPAIR OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 622.71 463.68GROUP HEALTH INC - WORKSITE EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A HEALTH INSURANCE 463.68 142.28GUEST SERVICES OPERATIONS EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 142.28 2,750.46HALL, JAY WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 2,750.46 2,000.00HALLQUIST, WILLIAM PERFORMING ARTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,000.00 412.50HAMILTON, MIKE BROOMBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 412.50 975.00HANUS, BRENT BROOMBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 975.00 79.75HARCEY, MICHAEL POLICE G & A TRAINING City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 15 3/30/2015CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:52:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400 15Page -Council Check Summary - 3/27/20152/21/2015 Amount Vendor ObjectBU Description 79.75 34.84HAVLIK, MATTHEW DARE PROGRAM TRAVEL/MEETINGS 42.84DARE PROGRAM MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 77.68 8,677.36HAWKINS INC WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 8,677.36 120.00HEALTHPARTNERSHUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 560.00HUMAN RESOURCES RECRUITMENT 680.00 50.00HECKLER & KOCH DEFENSE INC POLICE G & A POLICE EQUIPMENT 50.00 88.98HEINTZ, STEVEN FINANCE G & A MEETING EXPENSE 88.98 100.00HENNEPIN COUNTY FIRE CHIEFS ASSOC OPERATIONS SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 100.00 82.00HENNEPIN COUNTY RESIDENT & REAL ESTATE ASSESSING G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 82.00 465.62HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER IT G & A COMPUTER SERVICES 231.00GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,925.11POLICE G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 6,822.74POLICE G & A SUBSISTENCE SERVICE 64.80OPERATIONSRADIO COMMUNICATIONS 1,367.10OPERATIONSEMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 239.05PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE 347.00VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 11,462.42 200.00HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE OPERATIONS TRAINING 200.00 1,537.50HIGHVIEW PLUMBING INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 1,537.50 City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 16 3/30/2015CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:52:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400 16Page -Council Check Summary - 3/27/20152/21/2015 Amount Vendor ObjectBU Description 109.78HIPSHER, BRENT WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 109.78 422.82HIRSHFIELDSMUNICIPAL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 422.82 278.13HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 129.79ROUTINE MAINTENANCE SMALL TOOLS 11.92ROUTINE MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 7.90SNOW PLOWING GENERAL SUPPLIES 80.54INSTALLATIONOTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 220.99WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 309.21PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,038.48 630.00HOWES, JEFFREY VOLLEYBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 630.00 600.00HRGREENTECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 600.00 243.75HYDRA POWER HYDRAULICS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 243.75 1,546.00I.U.O.E. LOCAL NO 49 EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S UNION DUES 1,546.00 19.00IATNVEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 19.00 36.00IGNATFEVA, ANNA YOUTH PROGRAMS PROGRAM REVENUE 36.00 1,252.78IMPACT PROVEN SOLUTIONS WATER UTILITY G&A POSTAGE 1,252.78SEWER UTILITY G&A POSTAGE 1,252.79SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS POSTAGE 1,252.79STORM WATER UTILITY G&A POSTAGE 5,011.14 3.89INDELCOPARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 3.89 City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 17 3/30/2015CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:52:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400 17Page -Council Check Summary - 3/27/20152/21/2015 Amount Vendor ObjectBU Description 4,555.49INTEGRA TELECOM IT G & A TELEPHONE 4,555.49 804.23INVER GROVE FORD GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 887.78GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 1,692.01 25.00IPMA-HR MINNESOTA HUMAN RESOURCES SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 75.00HUMAN RESOURCES TRAINING 100.00 761.13I-STATE TRUCK CENTER GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 761.13 100.29J & F REDDY RENTS GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 100.29 236.51JEFFERSON FIRE & SAFETY INC OPERATIONS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 236.51 16.17JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 47.24GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 283.08OPERATIONSOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 1,267.71OPERATIONSSMALL TOOLS 3.64ROUTINE MAINTENANCE SMALL TOOLS 7.72ROUTINE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT PARTS 87.36WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT PARTS 180.28PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 10.57PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 43.57GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,947.34 25.00JIRIK, MICHELLE YOUTH PROGRAMS PROGRAM REVENUE 25.00 300.00JM CONSULTING LTD WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 300.00 203.27KARCHER-RAMOS, AMBER INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 203.27 City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 18 3/30/2015CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:52:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400 18Page -Council Check Summary - 3/27/20152/21/2015 Amount Vendor ObjectBU Description 1,500.00KAYAK REMODELING & REDEVELOPMENT ESCROWS INGLEWOOD AVE - WOLSON 1,500.00 1,375.55KEITH'S TARPS INC PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,375.55 250.00KELLER, DR MICHAEL POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 250.00 503.08KELLER, JASMINE Z EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S WAGE GARNISHMENTS 503.08 380.00KILLMER ELECTRIC CO INC SYSTEM REPAIR OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 380.00 110.00KIMMEL, ELKA INSPECTIONS G & A 1&2 SINGLE FAM. RENTAL 110.00 405.75KOERING, STEVE OPERATIONS SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 405.75 25.00KOTTKE, KATHRYN YOUTH PROGRAMS PROGRAM REVENUE 25.00 4,000.00KRALICK, KENNETH ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 4,000.00 529.19KRISS PREMIUM PRODUCTS INC REC CENTER BUILDING OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 529.19 2,337.57LARSCO INC WATER UTILITY G&A TRAINING 2,337.57 2,566.05LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES INC EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S UNION DUES 2,566.05 1,240.00LEAGUE OF MN CITIES STORM WATER UTILITY G&A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 1,240.00 11,743.75LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INSURANCE TRUST UNINSURED LOSS G&A BLDG & CONTENTS INSURANCE City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 19 3/30/2015CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:52:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400 19Page -Council Check Summary - 3/27/20152/21/2015 Amount Vendor ObjectBU Description 777.00UNINSURED LOSS G&A PUBLIC LIABILITY INSURANCE 26,268.02UNINSURED LOSS G&A UNINSURED LOSS 38,788.77 431.94LEAP MANUFACTURING LLC PATCHING-PERMANENT OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 345.10WORK FOR OTHERS (DPT)OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 777.04 75.00LEHRMAN, SHARON HEALTH IN THE PARK INITIATIVE TRAINING 75.00 10,084.00LEICA GEOSYSTEMS INC TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 10,084.00 27,730.00LEOTEK ELECTRONICS USA LLC SYSTEM REPAIR OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 7,670.00PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 35,400.00 277.00LIBERTY TIRE RECYCLING LLC VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 277.00 1,886.00LIFESAVER FIRE PROTECTION PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,886.00 7,054.11LINAEMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A LONG TERM DISABILITY 7,054.11 112.00LINDUS CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONS G & A BUILDING 112.00 1,176.92LITTLE FALLS MACHINE INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 1,176.92 10,348.90LOCKRIDGE GRINDAL NAUEN PLLP REILLY G & A LEGAL SERVICES 10,348.90 600.54LOFFLER COMPANIES POLICE G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 600.54 77,862.73LOGISIT G & A COMPUTER SERVICES 34,377.93TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 20 3/30/2015CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:52:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400 20Page -Council Check Summary - 3/27/20152/21/2015 Amount Vendor ObjectBU Description 112,240.66 1,083.10LUBRICATION TECHNOLOGIES INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 726.18OPERATIONSOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 1,809.28 1,000.00LYNCH, STACIA ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 1,000.00 550.99MACQUEEN EQUIP CO GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 336.96SEWER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT PARTS 887.95 457.44MALONE, DANIEL ATHLETIC CAMPS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 457.44 45.00MAMAADMINISTRATION G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 45.00 21,361.55MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 21,361.55 1,983.60-MCCROSSAN INC, C S STREET CAPITAL PROJ BAL SHEET RETAINED PERCENTAGE 66,120.00CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 64,136.40 450.00MCPAPOLICE G & A TRAINING 450.00 4.98MENARDSROUTINE MAINTENANCE SMALL TOOLS 7.79ROUTINE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT PARTS 110.29WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 15.99PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 136.20WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 275.25 461.81METERING & TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 461.81 865.00METRO BLOOMS STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 865.00 City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 21 3/30/2015CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:52:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400 21Page -Council Check Summary - 3/27/20152/21/2015 Amount Vendor ObjectBU Description 1,340.00METRO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS VOLLEYBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,340.00 15,071.05METROPOLITAN COUNCIL REILLY BUDGET CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 307,654.25SEWER UTILITY BALANCE SHEET PREPAID EXPENSES 322,725.30 54.08MICKELSON, TODD WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 54.08 126.00MIDDLE ENGLISH INTERPRETING NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH MEETING EXPENSE 126.00 63.25MIDURA, KAY ADMINISTRATION G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 63.25 730.89MIDWEST BADGE & NOVELTY CO OPERATIONS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 730.89 1,146.64MILLER ELECTRIC INSPECTIONS G & A ELECTRICAL 1,146.64 584.10MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPT PAWN FEES OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 584.10 139.00MINNESOTA BENEFIT ASSOC EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S ACCRUED OTHER BENEFITS 139.00 4,975.00MINNESOTA BUREAU CRIMINAL APPREHENSION POLICE G & A TRAINING 4,975.00 147.66MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PYT CTR EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S WAGE GARNISHMENTS 147.66 150.00MINNESOTA DEPT HEALTH STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 21,558.00WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 21,708.00 16.00MINNESOTA NCPERS LIFE INS EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S ACCRUED OTHER BENEFITS 16.00 City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 22 3/30/2015CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:52:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400 22Page -Council Check Summary - 3/27/20152/21/2015 Amount Vendor ObjectBU Description 12.24MINNESOTA WANNER COMPANY SNOW PLOWING EQUIPMENT PARTS 12.24 82.00MINUTEMAN PRESS COMM & MARKETING G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 38.00IT G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 120.00 36.35MINVALCO INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 36.35 625.44M-K GRAPHICS FINANCE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 625.44 10.00MN DEPT LABOR & INDUSTRY WATER UTILITY G&A LICENSES 10.00 230.00MNFIAM BOOK SALES OPERATIONS TRAINING 230.00 2,500.00MOBIUS INC HEALTH IN THE PARK INITIATIVE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,500.00 12,009.63MOSS & BARNETT FRANCHISE ADMINISTRATION OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 12,009.63 1,635.12MOTOROLACOMMUNICATIONS/GV REIMBURSEABL EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 1,635.12 258.00MPCAGENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 345.00WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,230.00REILLY BUDGET LICENSES 258.00VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 2,091.00 20.00MPSTMAPARK MAINTENANCE G & A TRAINING 120.00PARK MAINTENANCE G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 140.00 760.00MRPABASKETBALLSUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 760.00 City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 23 3/30/2015CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:52:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400 23Page -Council Check Summary - 3/27/20152/21/2015 Amount Vendor ObjectBU Description 110.20MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO.GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 18.61GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES 128.81 109.00MTI DISTRIBUTING CO GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 109.00 2,600.00MTOAERUTRAINING 2,600.00 180.00MUNICI-PALS INSPECTIONS G & A TRAINING 180.00 4,000.00MUSICANT, MAX HEALTH IN THE PARK INITIATIVE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,000.00 1,601.50MVTL LABORATORIES REILLY BUDGET OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,601.50 335.00NAC MECHANICAL & ELECTRICAL SERVICES FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 335.00 842.79NAPA (GENUINE PARTS CO)GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 18.37ROUTINE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT PARTS 62.94WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT PARTS 19.47PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 259.93GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,203.50 1,069.86NARTEC INC POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 9.86POLICE G & A POSTAGE 1,079.72 395.00NATIONAL ASSOC SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICERSPOLICE G & A TRAINING 395.00 341.00NATURAL REFLECTIONS VII LLC SSD 1 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 341.00 1,000.00NEUMANN, NEAL BROOMBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 24 3/30/2015CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:52:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400 24Page -Council Check Summary - 3/27/20152/21/2015 Amount Vendor ObjectBU Description 1,000.00 198.85NOKOMIS SHOE SHOP WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 198.85 150.00NORTH STAR CHAPTER APPRAISAL INSTITUTE ASSESSING G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 150.00 13,359.38NORTHEAST TREE INC TREE MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 13,359.38 316.44NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 276.08VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 592.52 9,500.00NORTHERN STAR JUVENILE DIVERSION POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 9,500.00 2,963.12NORTHLAND MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 2,963.12 31,884.88NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMM & MARKETING G & A PRINTING & PUBLISHING 31,884.88 536.70OAK KNOLL ANIMAL HOSPITAL POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 536.70 20.46OFFICE DEPOT ADMINISTRATION G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 94.53ADMINISTRATION G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 131.07HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICE SUPPLIES 96.07GENERAL INFORMATION OFFICE SUPPLIES 100.06GENERAL INFORMATION OFFICE EQUIPMENT 221.40POLICE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 225.75NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH GENERAL SUPPLIES 112.38INSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 158.70PUBLIC WORKS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 9.43HOUSING REHAB G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 88.69ORGANIZED REC G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 41.80VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,300.34 City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 25 3/30/2015CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:52:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400 25Page -Council Check Summary - 3/27/20152/21/2015 Amount Vendor ObjectBU Description 74.66OLSEN CHAIN & CABLE CO INC TREE MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 74.66 310.00OLSON, JEAN HEALTH IN THE PARK INITIATIVE GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 114.06HEALTH IN THE PARK INITIATIVE MEETING EXPENSE 424.06 517.46OMAHA PAPER COMPANY INC REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES 517.46 2,378.00ON DECK SPORTS PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 2,378.00 51.00ON SITE SANITATION NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 843.00PORTABLE TOILETS/FIELD MAINT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 99.50OFF-LEASH DOG PARK OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 127.00WESTWOOD G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,120.50 18,750.00OPPIDAN INC ESCROWS GENERAL 18,750.00 50.67O'REILLY AUTO PARTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 50.67 257.04OXYGEN SERVICE COMPANY INC OPERATIONS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 257.04 248.00PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 10.00WATER UTILITY G&A BANK CHARGES/CREDIT CD FEES 258.00 208.00PARSONS ELECTRIC TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 208.00 102.91PASSOLT, ROBERT WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 102.91 500.00PATRIOT BUSINESS GROUP ESCROWS DEMO / BROOKSIDE TRAFFIC 500.00 City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 26 3/30/2015CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:52:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400 26Page -Council Check Summary - 3/27/20152/21/2015 Amount Vendor ObjectBU Description 2,100.00PCCS INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 2,100.00 225.00PERNSTEINER CREATIVE GROUP INC HEALTH IN THE PARK INITIATIVE PRINTING & PUBLISHING 2,122.00COMM & MARKETING G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,347.00 545.00PERRA, SUSAN FACILITY ROOM RENTAL RENT REVENUE 545.00 19.52PETTY CASH POLICE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 10.00POLICE G & A TRAVEL/MEETINGS 21.50DWI ENFORCEMENT LICENSES 51.02 36.44PETTY CASH - WWNC WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 24.70FAMILY PROGRAMS GENERAL SUPPLIES 24.35HALLOWEEN PARTY GENERAL SUPPLIES 85.49 4,077.40POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 4,077.40 257.64POPP.COM INC PARK MAINTENANCE G & A TELEPHONE 257.64 220.00POSTMASTERCOMM & MARKETING G & A POSTAGE 220.00 196.04PRECISE MRM LLC PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A TELEPHONE 196.05WATER UTILITY G&A MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENT 196.05SEWER UTILITY G&A MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENT 196.05STORM WATER UTILITY G&A MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENT 784.19 198.00PRECISION LANDSCAPE & TREE TREE DISEASE PUBLIC CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 198.00 68.99PREMIUM WATERS INC OPERATIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES 68.99 City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 27 3/30/2015CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:52:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400 27Page -Council Check Summary - 3/27/20152/21/2015 Amount Vendor ObjectBU Description 190.00PRINTERS SERVICE INC ARENA MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 190.00 324.00PUBLIC SAFETY SOFTWARE GROUP POLICE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 324.00 600.55PUMP & METER SERVICE PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 600.55 29.95RAGAN COMMUNICATIONS INC OPERATIONS SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 29.95 579.63RAILROAD MANAGEMENT COMPANY III LLC WATER UTILITY G&A LICENSES 579.63 2,426.76RANDY'S SANITATION INC FACILITY OPERATIONS GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE 1,383.00REC CENTER BUILDING GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE 3,809.76 69.02RDO EQUIPMENT CO GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 69.02 294.53REGENCY OFFICE PRODUCTS LLC POLICE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 294.53 2,766.01RICOH USA INC IT G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 675.00TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 3,441.01 469.21RIEDELL SHOES INC ARENA MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 469.21 136.97RIGID HITCH INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 136.97 250.00RINCON, GUSTAVO ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 250.00 1,790.00ROBARGE ENTERPRISES INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 1,790.00 City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 28 3/30/2015CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:52:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400 28Page -Council Check Summary - 3/27/20152/21/2015 Amount Vendor ObjectBU Description 2,000.00ROGERS, KYLE BROOMBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,000.00 255.00ROOT-O-MATIC SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 255.00 259.00ROTO-ROOTER FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 259.00 140.00ROWEHL, KAREN HEALTH IN THE PARK INITIATIVE TRAINING 140.00 37.12SAM'S CLUB OPERATIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES 135.00OPERATIONSSUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 103.40OPERATIONSSEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 180.00PUBLIC WORKS G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 405.00ORGANIZED REC G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 68.17ORGANIZED REC G & A INTEREST/FINANCE CHARGES 220.96WARMING HOUSES GENERAL SUPPLIES 90.00PARK MAINTENANCE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 45.00WESTWOOD G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 1,284.65 229.00SANDLER IMPORTS ADMINISTRATION G & A LOCAL GAMBLING 229.00 188.00SANFORD HEALTH OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE HUMAN RESOURCES RECRUITMENT 188.00 1,215.00SAVATREETREE DISEASE PRIVATE CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 1,215.00 90.70SCHAAKE COMPANY, AJ ADMINISTRATION G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 135.40HUMAN RESOURCES RECOGNITION 226.10 6,910.00SCHMITZ CONSTRUCTION CO LLC, J P WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 6,910.00 668.00SCHRAMM, HOLLY FITNESS PROGRAMS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 668.00 City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 29 3/30/2015CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:52:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400 29Page -Council Check Summary - 3/27/20152/21/2015 Amount Vendor ObjectBU Description 2,038.49SCHWAB VOLLHABER LUBRATT SERVICE CORP GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 2,038.49 6,742.73SEHSTREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,498.02STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 8,240.75 12,432.00SHAWN, JACK BASKETBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 12,432.00 98.48SHERWIN WILLIAMS GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 98.48 175.05SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 175.05 177.00SHRED-IT USA MINNEAPOLIS ADMINISTRATION G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 10.00FINANCE G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 53.50POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 240.50 190.00SHRMHUMAN RESOURCES SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 190.00 145.00SIEGEL, WAYNE INSPECTIONS G & A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE 145.00 2,288.00SIGNATURE MECHANICAL INC PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,288.00 43.50SIRCHIE FINGER PRINT LABS INC POLICE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 43.50 30.00SKALLET, DAVID INSPECTIONS G & A TRAINING 30.00 1,524.90SLP FF ASSOC IAFF LOCAL #993 EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S UNION DUES 1,524.90 2,660.00SNEEZING COW INC OPERATIONS SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 30 3/30/2015CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:52:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400 30Page -Council Check Summary - 3/27/20152/21/2015 Amount Vendor ObjectBU Description 2,660.00 2,835.09SOURCE WATER SOLUTIONS LLC WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,835.09 225.00SPIKER, MADELYN INSPECTIONS G & A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE 225.00 15,497.59SPRINTIT G & A DATACOMMUNICATIONS 5,400.00POLICE G & A TELEPHONE 20,897.59 702.98SPS COMPANIES INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 702.98 2,361.98SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC ESCROWS GENERAL 762.26STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,124.24 440.00ST LOUIS PARK COMMUNITY EDUCATION HEALTH IN THE PARK INITIATIVE RENTAL BUILDINGS 22.50YOUTH PROGRAMS PROGRAM REVENUE 462.50 916.00STANDARD SPRING GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 916.00 183.30STAR TRIBUNE ADMINISTRATION G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 299.00POLICE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 482.30 287.50STATE OF MINNESOTA REC CENTER BUILDING OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 287.50 1,250.00STEDMAN, JOHN ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 1,250.00 94.04STEPP MANUFACTURING CO INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 94.04 7,390.04STONEBROOKE EQUIPMENT INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 7,390.04 City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 31 3/30/2015CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:52:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400 31Page -Council Check Summary - 3/27/20152/21/2015 Amount Vendor ObjectBU Description 595.00STREICHER'S GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES 595.00 44.58STRINGER, BETSY HEALTH IN THE PARK INITIATIVE MEETING EXPENSE 44.58 38.56SUBURBAN GM PARTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 38.56 2,131.28SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 2,131.28 440.95SULANDER, PAT FINANCE G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 440.95 23,318.25SUMMIT ENVIROSOLUTIONS INC REILLY BUDGET GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 23,318.25 245.04SWANASOLID WASTE G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 245.04 614.30SWANSON FLO-SYSTEMS CO WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 614.30 1,000.00TAHEY, BRIAN & MELISSA ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 1,000.00 1,060.23TALKPOINT TECHNOLOGIES INC E-911 PROGRAM TELEPHONE 1,060.23 20.64TELELANGUAGE INC ADMINISTRATION G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 20.64 1,317.84TERMINIX INT GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 101.00REC CENTER BUILDING BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 1,418.84 555.84THOMAS TOOL & SUPPLY INC PARK MAINTENANCE G & A SMALL TOOLS 555.84 City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 32 3/30/2015CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:52:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400 32Page -Council Check Summary - 3/27/20152/21/2015 Amount Vendor ObjectBU Description 277.84THOMSON REUTERS WEST PAYMENT CENTER POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 277.84 128.65THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT SUMMER GRADE 6-8 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 128.65 700.00TIGER OAK PUBLICATIONS COMM & MARKETING G & A PRINTING & PUBLISHING 700.00 1,359.00TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL ADMINISTRATION G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,359.00 379.38TITAN MACHINERY GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 379.38 4,200.69TKDAWATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,200.69 175.00TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 175.00 1,123.00TOWMASTERGENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 1,123.00 266.49TROIDL, ERIC WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 266.49 1,304.56TRUCK UTILITIES MFG CO UNINSURED LOSS G&A UNINSURED LOSS 1,304.56 1,780.50TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO UNINSURED LOSS G&A UNINSURED LOSS 1,780.50 2,422.26TWIN CITY OUTDOOR SERVICES INC SNOW PLOWING OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,470.00SSD 1 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 524.00SSD 3 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,416.26 956.34U + B ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN MUNICIPAL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 956.34 City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 33 3/30/2015CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:52:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400 33Page -Council Check Summary - 3/27/20152/21/2015 Amount Vendor ObjectBU Description 3,229.50UHL CO INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 1,605.00TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT 6,710.76MUNICIPAL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 11,545.26 177.40UNIFORMS UNLIMITED (FIRE)OPERATIONS UNIFORMS 177.40 3,278.10UNIFORMS UNLIMITED (PD)POLICE G & A POLICE EQUIPMENT 3,278.10 316.00UNITED WAY OF MINNEAPOLIS AREA EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S UNITED WAY 316.00 297.50UNO DOS TRES COMMUNICATIONS POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 297.50 25.51UPS STORE WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 25.51 74.44USI EDUCATION & GOVERNMENT SALES ORGANIZED REC G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 74.44 357.90VAIL, LORI HUMAN RESOURCES RECOGNITION 357.90 7,330.78-VALLEY PAVING INC STREET CAPITAL PROJ BAL SHEET RETAINED PERCENTAGE 146,615.67CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 139,284.89 6,405.34VALLEY-RICH CO INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 5,889.22SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 12,294.56 196.65VAUGHAN, JIM ENVIRONMENTAL G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 196.65 20.00VERIFIED CREDENTIALS HUMAN RESOURCES RECRUITMENT 20.00 50.04VERIZON WIRELESS SEWER UTILITY G&A TELEPHONE City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 34 3/30/2015CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:52:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400 34Page -Council Check Summary - 3/27/20152/21/2015 Amount Vendor ObjectBU Description 8,518.57CELLPHONES, IPADS, ETC.OFFICE EQUIPMENT 74.48CELLPHONES, IPADS, ETC.TELEPHONE 8,643.09 2,000.00VIGNE, KENNETH & EMILY ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 2,000.00 418.46VIKING INDUSTRIAL CTR ROUTINE MAINTENANCE OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 418.46 5,446.00VOICE AND DATA NETWORKS TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 5,446.00 39.95WARNING LITES OF MN INC TRAINING TRAINING 39.95 3,801.74WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 3,801.74 35.00WEDEKIND, TODD GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 35.00 161.75WEINBERG SUPPLY CO OPERATIONS REPAIRS 161.75 2,500.00WESTAR HOME INC ESCROWS DEMO / BROOKSIDE TRAFFIC 2,500.00 1,200.00WESTLUND, TOM & EMILY ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 1,200.00 100.00WESTWOOD LUTHERN CHURCH POLICE G & A MEETING EXPENSE 100.00 2,622.50WIBIT SPORTS GMBH AQUATIC PARK BUDGET BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 2,622.50 67.33WODTKE, RON SUMMER THEATER ARTS CAMP GENERAL SUPPLIES 67.33 1,710.00WRAP CITY GRAPHICS FABRICATION OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 35 3/30/2015CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:52:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400 35Page -Council Check Summary - 3/27/20152/21/2015 Amount Vendor ObjectBU Description 1,710.00 1,971.00WSB ASSOC INC STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,971.00 30,941.68XCEL ENERGY GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE ELECTRIC SERVICE 22.47OPERATIONSEMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 25,826.33PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE 56,921.62WATER UTILITY G&A ELECTRIC SERVICE 4,368.41REILLY BUDGET ELECTRIC SERVICE 7,729.63SEWER UTILITY G&A ELECTRIC SERVICE 1,863.79STORM WATER UTILITY G&A ELECTRIC SERVICE 10,423.75PARK MAINTENANCE G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE 109.03BRICK HOUSE (1324)ELECTRIC SERVICE 56.15WW RENTAL HOUSE (1322)ELECTRIC SERVICE 662.78WESTWOOD G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE 14,832.85REC CENTER BUILDING ELECTRIC SERVICE 153,758.49 40.00YAHOO ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 40.00 521.99ZACKS INC WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 262.47VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 784.46 77.10ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 77.10 20.00ZIP PRINTING HEALTH IN THE PARK INITIATIVE PRINTING & PUBLISHING 20.00 6,175.00ZUERCHER TECHNOLOGIES LLC POLICE G & A TRAINING 6,175.00 Report Totals 2,143,307.11 City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 36 Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 6, 2015 Consent Agenda Item: 4b EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Resolution Supporting Bader Development’s Submission of a Grant Application to the Hennepin County Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Program for Its Proposed Encore Project RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt a Resolution of Support for Bader Development’s submission of a grant application to the Hennepin County Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Program for its proposed Encore project. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council support Bader Development’s application for a $499,000 TOD grant to facilitate its proposed mixed-use redevelopment at CSAH 25 and France Ave? SUMMARY: Bader Development has purchase agreements to acquire 3907 & 3915 Highway 7, 3031 Glenhurst Ave., and 3914 & 3918 31st St W. The developer proposes to remove the current buildings and residences and replace them with a mixed-use development consisting of 147 apartment units (including 20% affordable units), and 20,000 square feet of ground-floor office space along with underground and surface parking. In February, a Comprehensive Plan Amendment was approved changing the land use on these properties to Mixed Use to allow for the proposed redevelopment. The developer has since applied for a preliminary and final plat and a preliminary and final PUD which is expected to be scheduled at the City Council in late May. To help offset some of the public improvement costs Bader has applied for a $499,000 Hennepin County TOD grant for pedestrian and bike improvements including sidewalks, bike parking and bike racks, a bike repair station, showers for commuters, landscape improvements at pedestrian connections, site lighting for the pedestrian way, pedestrian plaza, and pedestrian amenities. Hennepin County requires an authorizing resolution from the governing body of the city where the project site is located indicating that the city supports the grant application. Grant awards are typically announced by June. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: This grant program does not require any financial match from the City. Bader Development is the grant applicant, and should funds be awarded, Bader will work directly with Hennepin County to administer the grant. VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a well-maintained and diverse housing stock. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Grant Application Resolution of Support Prepared by: Julie Grove, Planning and Economic Development Assistant Reviewed by: Greg Hunt, Economic Development Coordinator Michele Schnitker, Housing Supervisor Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager and EDA Executive Director City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4b) Page 2 Title: Resolution Supporting Bader Development Application for Hennepin Cnty. TOD Grant for ENCORE Project RESOLUTION NO. 15-___ RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT OF AN APPLICATION FOR A HENNEPIN COUNTY TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) GRANT SUBMITTED BY BADER DEVELOPMENT FOR “ENCORE” AT CSAH 25 AND FRANCE AVE WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park acknowledges the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners has authorized approximately $2 million in the 2015 budget for transit oriented development (TOD) projects; and WHEREAS, Bader Development wishes to submit an application requesting grant funds from the Hennepin County Transit Oriented Development Program; and WHEREAS, the grant funds will be used for certain Public Improvement Costs associated with the proposed Encore redevelopment project at the southwest corner of CSAH 25 and France Ave in the City of St. Louis Park; and WHEREAS, the Hennepin County Transit Oriented Development Program Guidelines require support by the governing body of the City Council for submission of a grant application to the Hennepin County Transit Oriented Development Program; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of St. Louis Park, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 383B.77, subd. 3., supports the submission of a Transit Oriented Development Program grant application to the Hennepin County Housing and Redevelopment Authority by Bader Development for the proposed Encore project. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council April 6, 2015 City Manager Mayor Attest City Clerk Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 6, 2015 Consent Agenda Item: 4c EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Bid Tabulation: Pavement Management Project - Area 3 - Project No. 4015-1003 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to designate Park Construction Company the lowest responsible bidder and authorize execution of a contract with the firm in the amount of $2,485,387.92 for the 2015 Local Street Rehabilitation Project (Area 3) - Project No. 4015-1003. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish to continue to implement our pavement management program? SUMMARY: A total of two (2) bids were received for this project. A summary of the bid results is as follows: CONTRACTOR BID AMOUNT Park Construction Co.** $2,485,387.92 Bituminous Roadways Inc. $3,093,843.86 Engineer’s Estimate $2,928,100.44 **Park Construction Company original bid, after review, $2,485,387.92 is the accepted bid $2,760,387.92 A review of the bids indicates Park Construction Company submitted the lowest bid. Park Construction is a reputable contractor. Staff recommends that a contract be awarded to the firm in the amount of $2,485,387.92. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: This project was planned for and included in the City’s adopted Capital Improvement Program with an original estimated budget of $2,642,250. The Engineers Estimate noted above includes additional work not originally identified when the project was incorporated into the CIP. This project will be funded by the Pavement Management Fund, Sanitary Sewer Fund, Stormwater Utility Fund, Water Utility Fund and by Connect the Park! funding sources. Additional funding details are provided in the Discussion section of the report. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion Prepared by: Jack Sullivan, Senior Engineering Project Manager Reviewed by: Deb Heiser, Engineering Director, Brian Swanson, City Controller Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4c) Page 2 Title: Bid Tab: Local Street Rehab Project - Pavement Management Area 3 - Project No. 4015-1003 DISCUSSION BACKGROUND: Bids were received on March 27, 2015 for the 2015 Local Street Rehabilitation Project – Area 3. The 2015 construction season will be the eleventh year of implementing the City’s Pavement Management Program. This year’s work, Project No. 4015- 1003, will be performed in Area 3 of the City’s eight pavement management areas. It includes work in the Cedar Manor, Crestview, Westdale and Westwood Hills Neighborhoods. Selection was based on street condition surveys and field evaluations to determine current conditions of the pavement, curb and gutter, and the city’s underground utilities. City staff worked together to select streets and to recommend appropriate rehabilitation techniques for inclusion in this year’s Pavement Management Projects. An advertisement for bids was published in the St. Louis Park Sun-Sailor on March 5, 2015. In addition, plans and specifications are noticed on the City Website and are made available electronically via the internet by our vendor QuestCDN.com. Email notification was provided to five minority associations and final printed plans were available for viewing at iSqFt, The Blue Book Building & Construction Network Planrooms and at City Hall. Forty one contractors/vendors purchased plan sets with six Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE) identifying themselves as subcontractors. Funding Details Staff has analyzed the bids and determined that Park Construction Company is a qualified contractor that can complete this work during the 2015 construction season. The original project scope was increased to include the following additional work in the pavement management area: • expand the City owned fiber optic network • construction of the 14th Street Sidewalk segments associated with the Connect the Park! plan Based on the low bid received, cost and funding details are revised as follows: Revenues Pavement Management Fund $1,513,133.46 Sanitary Sewer Fund $ 63,124.57 Storm Sewer Fund $ 98,127.34 Watermain Fund $ 783,863.44 Connect the Park! (Sidewalks) $ 27,139.11 Total $2,485,387.92 Construction Timeline: Construction is tentatively planned to begin in early May and should be completed by late September 2015. Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 6, 2015 Consent Agenda Item: 4d EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Bid Tabulation: Traffic Signal Project – 36th Street W. at Wooddale Avenue and at Xenwood Avenue - Project No. 4014-1300 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to designate Thomas & Sons Construction, Inc. the lowest responsible bidder and authorize execution of a contract with the firm in the amount of $454,916 for traffic signal work at 36th Street and Wooddale Avenue and 36th Street at Xenwood Avenue - Project# 4014-1300. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish to accept the low bid and allow this project to move forward? SUMMARY: A total of three (5) bids were received for this project. A summary of the bid results is as follows: CONTRACTOR BID AMOUNT Thomas & Sons Construction, Inc. $454,916.00 New Look Contracting, Inc. $457,960.00 Eagan Company $519,893.10 Granite Ledge Electrical Contractor, Inc. $527,221.90 Concrete Idea, Inc. $573,350.00 Engineer’s Estimate $353,098.10 A review of the bids indicates Thomas & Sons Construction, Inc. submitted the lowest bid Thomas & Sons Construction, Inc. is a reputable contractor that has successfully completed worked for the City before. Staff recommends that a contract be awarded to the firm in the amount of $454,916. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: This project was planned for and included in the City’s adopted Capital Improvement Program with an original estimated budget of $755,000. This budget includes construction and engineering costs as well as contingency costs. The funding for this project has been budgeted with funds provided by the Elmwood TIF District. VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged community. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion Prepared by: Phillip Elkin, Senior Engineering Project Manager Reviewed by: Debra Heiser, Engineering Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4d) Page 2 Title: Bid Tabulation: Traffic Signal Project 36th St. W. at Wooddale Ave. & at Xenwood Ave.-Project 4014-1300 DISCUSSION BACKGROUND: Signal / Intersection Improvements at Wooddale and 36th Street were included in the 2014 Capital Improvement Program in anticipation of future traffic being re- directed to this intersection as part of the MnDOT Highway 100 improvement project. The signal at Xenwood, originally planned for 2018 was added to this project to address the anticipated re- development and traffic modifications which will accompany the construction of SWLRT. The need for the improvements is made more immediate by the TH100 project where this section of Wooddale Avenue will be a detour route during the closure of the Hwy 7 Bridge in 2016. Bids were received on March 16, 2015 for the Traffic Signal Project – W. 36th Street at Wooddale Avenue and at Xenwood Avenue. An advertisement for bids was published in the St. Louis Park Sun-Sailor on February 19, and 26, 2015. In addition, plans and specifications are posted on the City Website and are made available electronically via the internet by our vendor QuestCDN.com. Email notification was provided to five minority associations and final printed plans were available for viewing at iSqFt and The Blue Book Building & Construction Network Planrooms and at City Hall. Twenty contractors/vendors purchased plan sets and bids were received from five contractors on March 16, 2015. This project includes the following improvements: 36th Street and Wooddale Avenue • Remove and replace signals. • Install pedestrian countdown and accessible pedestrian signals on all approaches. • Remove the west approach median, modify northwest pork-chop island, and restripe to include a dedicated left, though, and right-turn lanes • Restripe the south approach to include a dedicated left-turn lane and modify southeast pork-chop island to allow the northbound to eastbound movement to travel in its own lane • The right-turn movement should have yield control to assist pedestrian crossings • Revise/ optimize signal timing (new controller and cabinet) • Install protective-permitted phasing on all approaches (i.e. flashing yellow arrow) • Modify the northwest curb line to accommodate southbound to westbound truck movements • Modify the southwest curb line to accommodate westbound to southbound movement 36th Street and Xenwood Avenue • Install signals. • Install protective-permitted phasing on west bound 36th Street and southbound Xenwood approaches (i.e. flashing yellow arrow) • Install pedestrian countdown and accessible pedestrian signals on all approaches. Construction Timeline Construction is tentatively planned to begin in late April and should be completed by late June. Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 6, 2015 Consent Agenda Item: 4e EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Bid Tabulation: Sanitary Sewer Main Rehab Project No. 4014-3003 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to designate Insituform Technologies as the lowest responsible bidder and authorize execution of a contract with the firm in the amount of $273,460.80 for the Sanitary Sewer Main Rehab Project #4014-3003. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish to accept the low bid and allow this project to move forward? SUMMARY: A total of three (6) bids were received for this project. A summary of the bid results is as follows: CONTRACTOR BID AMOUNT Insituform Technologies $273,460.80 Visu-Sewer, Inc. $291,665.20 Michels Corp. $379,647.00 Veit & Co. $383,926.00 SAK Construction $393,000.00 Lametti & Sons Engineer’s Estimate $399,188.00 $286,204.00 A review of the bids indicates Insituform Technologies submitted the lowest bid. Insituform is a reputable contractor that has successfully completed worked for the City before. Staff recommends that a contract be awarded to the firm in the amount of $273,460.80. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: This project has been programmed in the Capital Improvement Program (C.I.P.) for construction in 2015 using Sanitary Sewer Utility Funds. The C.I.P. originally estimated this project to cost $385,000. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not Applicable SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion Prepared by: Phillip Elkin, Senior Engineering Project Manager Reviewed by: Debra Heiser, Engineering Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4e) Page 2 Title: Bid Tabulation: Sanitary Sewer Main Rehab Project #4014-3003 DISCUSSION BACKGROUND: The City has a program to routinely video inspect the sewer system. Video inspection has revealed structural defects in various lines. Due to structural defects, infiltration, sewer blockages (backups), or line collapse may occur. To address these structural defects, before they lead to the problems described above, the city’s Capital Improvement Plan includes annual funding for a sanitary sewer main lining program. Lining can extend the life of our sanitary sewers by 50 years or more. This technology, called cured-in-place pipe (CIPP) renewal, installs a new resin pipe inside the old clay tile sewer main without digging up city streets, which results in minimal disruption to residents during construction. The liner pipe is inserted into the main through existing manholes and cured in place with a heat or steam process. Any given segment is usually completed in one working day. Service line connections are reopened using a robotic cutter and remote cameras. During the process, existing flows are bypassed using pumps. Project 4014-3003 includes lining of the sanitary sewer mains at in the following neighborhoods; Browndale, Aquila, Cedar Manor, Westwood Hills, Westdale and Crestview Neighborhoods. An advertisement for bids was published in the St. Louis Park Sun-Sailor on February 19, and 26, 2015. In addition, plans and specifications are noticed on the City Website and are made available electronically via the internet by our vendor Quest CDN.com. Email notification was provided to five minority associations and final printed plans were available for viewing at iSqFt and The Blue Book Building & Construction Network Planrooms and at City Hall. Nine contractors/vendors purchased plan sets and bids were received from six contractors on March 16, 2015. Construction Timeline Construction is tentatively planned to begin late April and should be completed by late June. Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 6, 2015 Consent Agenda Item: 4f EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Appointment of City Clerk Melissa Kennedy as Responsible Authority and Data Practices Compliance Official in Accordance with MN Statutes Chapter 13. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to appoint City Clerk Melissa Kennedy as responsible authority and data practices compliance official under MN Statutes Chapter 13. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the Council wish to appoint City Clerk Melissa Kennedy as responsible authority and data practices compliance official in accordance with MN Statutes Chapter 13? SUMMARY: Chapter 13 of Minnesota State Statute requires the City to formally appoint: • Responsible Authority – M.S. 13.02, Subd 16: "Responsible authority" in any political subdivision means the individual designated by the governing body of that political subdivision as the individual responsible for the collection, use, and dissemination of any set of data on individuals, government data, or summary data, unless otherwise provided by state law. • Data Practices Compliance Official – M.S. 13.05, Subd 13: Each responsible authority or other appropriate authority in every government entity shall appoint or designate an employee of the government entity to act as the entity's data practices compliance official. The data practices compliance official is the designated employee of the government entity to whom persons may direct questions or concerns regarding problems in obtaining access to data or other data practices problems. The responsible authority may be the data practices compliance official. City Clerk Nancy Stroth was appointed to this role and has now retired. Minnesota Statute Chapter 13 requires formal appointment of a responsible authority and compliance official for data practices and we recommend City Clerk Melissa Kennedy. As in our current practice, our City Clerk works with our City Attorney, Department Directors and other staff on data practices as needed. Acceptance of this consent item is the formal action to appoint City Clerk Melissa Kennedy as Responsible Authority – M.S. 13.02, Subd 16 and Data Practices Compliance Official – M.S. 13.05, Subd 13. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: None Prepared by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 6, 2015 Consent Agenda Item: 4g EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Traffic Study No. 652: Authorize Revision of Parking Restrictions Along Excelsior Boulevard at 4901, 4907, and 4911 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution Authorize Revision of Parking Restrictions along Excelsior Boulevard at 4901, 4907, and 4911. POLICY CONSIDERATION: The restriction is allowed per the City’s established regulatory authority. SUMMARY: This report considers the proposed revision of parking restrictions along the south side of the 4900 block of Excelsior Boulevard and recommends the City Council authorize the parking restrictions revision (see attached map) Recently the City received a request for a parking restriction revision from the owner of the business located at 4907 Excelsior Boulevard. The three businesses on this block rely on these parking spots for their customers due to limited off-street parking. Discussions with the business owners indicate a 1 hour parking restriction is adequate for their customers. Given the conditions identified, staff is of the opinion that a revision of the parking restriction appears to be an appropriate means of improving parking availability in the area. PUBLIC INPUT: A letter was mailed to adjacent property owners in February requesting comments on the proposed revision of parking restrictions. The owners of 4901 and 4907 Excelsior Boulevard are in favor of the parking restriction revisions. No comment was received from 4911 Excelsior Boulevard. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The cost of enacting these controls is minimal and will come out of the general operating budget. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution Map Resolution 92-082 Prepared by: Aaron Wiesen, Civil Engineer Reviewed by: Debra Heiser, Engineering Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4g) Page 2 Title: TS No. 652: Authorize Revision of Parking Restrictions Along Excelsior Blvd. at 4901, 4907, and 4911 RESOLUTION NO. 15-____ RESOLUTION REVISING PARKING RESTRICTION ALONG EXCELSIOR BOULEVARD AT 4901, 4907, AND 4911 TRAFFIC STUDY NO. 652 WHEREAS, the Engineering Director has reported to the City Council of St. Louis Park, Minnesota regarding the feasibility of revising existing 15 minute parking restrictions along 4901, 4907, and 4911 Excelsior Boulevard to 1 hour parking. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, that Resolution No 92-82 is rescinded and the Engineering Director is hereby authorized to install 1 hour parking restrictions along 4901, 4907, and 4911 Excelsior Boulevard. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council April 6, 2015 City Manager Mayor Attest: City Clerk City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4g) Page 3 Title: TS No. 652: Authorize Revision of Parking Restrictions Along Excelsior Blvd. at 4901, 4907, and 4911 TRAFFIC STUDY NO. 652 4901, 4907, 4911 Excelsior Boulevard (1 HOUR PARKING) N CURRENT: 15 MIN PARKING PROPOSED: 1 HR PARKING City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4g) Page 4 Title: TS No. 652: Authorize Revision of Parking Restrictions Along Excelsior Blvd. at 4901, 4907, and 4911 Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 6, 2015 Consent Agenda Item: 4h EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Accept Monetary Donation from Donna Hill to Westwood Hills Nature Center ($50) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to adopt resolution approving acceptance of a monetary donation from Donna Hill in the amount of $50 for Westwood Hills Nature Center to be used for program supplies. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish to accept the gift with restrictions on its use? SUMMARY: State statute requires City Council’s acceptance of donations. This requirement is necessary in order to make sure the City Council has knowledge of any restrictions placed on the use of each donation prior to it being expended. Donna Hill is graciously donating $50 to Westwood Hills Nature Center to be used for program supplies in memory of her grandson Oliver Hill. The donation is given with the restriction that it be used at Westwood Hills Nature Center. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: This donation will be used at Westwood Hills Nature Center. VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a leader in environmental stewardship. We will increase environmental consciousness and responsibility in all areas of city business. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution Prepared by: Stacy M. Voelker, Administrative Secretary Mark Oestreich, Westwood Hills Nature Center Manager Reviewed by: Cynthia S. Walsh, Director of Operations & Recreation Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4h) Page 2 Title: Accept Monetary Donation from Donna Hill to Westwood Hills Nature Center ($50) RESOLUTION NO. 15-____ RESOLUTION APPROVING ACCEPTANCE OF DONATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $50 TO BE USED AT WESTWOOD HILLS NATURE CENTER WHEREAS, The City of St. Louis Park is required by State statute to authorize acceptance of any donations; and WHEREAS, the City Council must also ratify any restrictions placed on the donation by the donor; and WHEREAS, Donna Hill donated $50 to Westwood Hills Nature Center to be used for program supplies in memory of Oliver Hill. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park that the gift is hereby accepted with thanks to Donna Hill with the understanding that it must be used at Westwood Hills Nature Center for program supplies. Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council April 6, 2015 City Manager Mayor Attest: City Clerk Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 6, 2015 Consent Agenda Item: 4i OFFICIAL MINUTES Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission December 3, 2014, 6:30 p.m. Meeting The Rec Center Programming Office 1. Call to Order Commission Member Worthington called the meeting to order at 6:29 p.m. Commission members present: George Foulkes, Elizabeth Griffin, George Hagemann, Edward Halvorson, Kirk Hawkinson and Tom Worthington. Commission members absent: Jim Beneke and Sarah Foulkes. Staff present: Rick Beane, Park Superintendent, Cindy Walsh, Director of Operations and Recreation, Sean Walther, Senior Planner, Jason West, Recreation Superintendent, and Stacy Voelker, Recording Secretary. Guests present: Anne Casey, Health in the Park, Sara Maaske, Health in the Park, and Bridget Gothberg, Organizational Development Coordinator. 2. Presentations a. Health in the Park (Anne Casey, Sara Maaske and Bridget Gothberg) Ms. Maaske provided the Commission her background and indicated she’s worked in health care most of her career. She wanted to be more involved in the City so Health in the Park was a great fit. Health in the Park (HIP) recently had kickoff event and received good feedback. HIP, along with the city, chose four parks and had interactive displays of those parks at the Park the Street event. Approximately 100 people added to the interactive displays at the event when asked what residents wanted to see in the parks. Ms. Maaske distributed facts and information on the feedback received. Ms. Maaske indicated HIP and PRAC can partnership on surveys (such as the interactive display), support for upcoming projects, etc. An example of a successful partnership is Yoga in the Park. It was requested by residents and will be offered through Community Education. Ms. Casey advised one of HIP’s key goals is to form partnerships with key groups in the community. Mr. Foulkes inquired if Community Education has reviewed other items on the survey list to which Ms. Maaske advised they have not. HIP is trying to get groups in the community working together as many of their goals overlap. Mr. Hawkinson suggested s snowman building contest or something to get people out in the winter. Ms. Maaske advised HIP has talked about winter activities that could utilize trails and warming houses in the winter. Ms. Casey indicated one of their goals is to ensure safe walking and biking on the trails in the winter. HIP feels pulling neighborhoods together to get their suggestions for improvements. City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4i) Page 2 Title: Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting Minutes of December 3, 2014 Ms. Gothberg advised HIP is about people being responsible for their own health. The community will do for itself; not have the city do by itself. Basically HIP wants collaboration, not competition. Ms. Maaske welcomes ideas on how HIP can move forward and get more in-depth. Mr. Worthington inquired if there are regular meetings; Ms. Maaske advised there are small action groups and the large group. HIP is connected to the Connect the Park group also. Ms. Gothberg asked the Commission and staff for details and/or pictures when residents participate in outdoor activities as they would like more action pictures. Ms. Maaske inquired what HIP can do to make it super easy to get people active. Members discussed and feel the neighborhood associations would be a great connection. Ms. Gothberg requested all members to tell at least five people about HIP; to spread the word and share their goals. All contact information can be found on HIP’s website at www.stlouispark.org/health-in-the-park-hip-slp. Mr. Walther inquired on the number of volunteers working on HIP, excluding employees. There are six volunteers and each subgroup has many, Ms. Gothberg advised. There are approximately 100 people total between all groups for HIP, including emigrants and diversity sub groups. Commission members and Health in the Park representatives thanked each other. b. Inclusive Playgrounds (Stephanie Lund) No show. 3. Approval of Minutes a. September 17, 2014 It was moved by Commission member Foulkes to approve the minutes as presented. The motion passed 6 – 0. 4. Old Business a. Outdoor Refrigerated Ice Update (Jason West) Ms. Walsh recapped the project and indicated city staff will be working with the Hockey Association as per City Council’s approval on October 27, 2014. The skate park will be relocated, potentially across the road on the Bass Lake Preserve site. Mr. West showed potential concepts of the outdoor refrigerated ice rink provided by RSP Architects which the City Council viewed on October 27, 2014. The concepts included cooling coils in the concrete floor, a canopy over ice which would also stretch over the fence into the Aquatic Park to increase the shade areas of the park, turf for spring activities, a storage area, lighting, and 38 parking spots. The canopy is stretched Teflon, similar to what MnDOT uses over their salt storage areas. Mr. Hawkinson inquired how the turf is installed; Mr. West advised Velcro holds it down and it is seamless. Mr. City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4i) Page 3 Title: Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting Minutes of December 3, 2014 Worthington inquired about restrooms; Mr. West advised there will be access to restrooms that are on the first and second levels. Another concept viewed included a plaza area as a gathering place. The outdoor arena would seat approximately 150-200 people. The area would mostly be used for practices. It would host games, as it will have a scoreboard, and open skating. The arena could also host the Ice Cream Social and other events, Mr. West advised. The St. Louis Park Hockey Association committed $1.5 million for this facility Ms. Walsh indicated. The arena will be a City-run facility and staff will schedule. b. Community Center Update (Jason West) Ms. Walsh indicated the schematic design piece was presented to the City Council on October 27, 2014. The City Council and staff walked the area of the proposal. The City Council is interested in going forward but have other large projects with huge costs that are on the forefront such as the Southwest Light Rail and other betterments for the City. The City Council directed the project be put on hold until the cost of the Southwest Light Rail project is known. Mr. West presented a potential schematic design of the project, of which the cost is estimated at $48 million. The area design includes a four-level parking ramp (which is approximately $10 million of the budget). The parking is three times the current allotment. The Community Center would include an indoor walking/running track, gymnasium, party rooms, common areas, fitness area, indoor pool, indoor lap lanes, climbing wall, basketball courts, and play area. Five times around the track would equal one mile. Another expensive item of the project are the contaminated soils, Mr. West advised. Soil borings have been cone but want more investigative work on the soils. The potential location of the indoor pool is where the worst soils exist. The plan allows for the indoor pool to be added at a later date. City staff has applied for grants to assist in the additional site assessment and a Response Action Plan (RAP) from the Hennepin County Environmental Response Fund, Met Council Tax Based Revitalization Account and Minnesota Employment of Economic Development (DEED) grant. Mr. Worthington inquired on the type of heating that would be utilized in the building. Mr. West advised staff and the consultant have reviewed how the city can capture heat lost in the refrigerated ice. Various sustainability items are being discussed. Mr. Worthington commented the appearance is a lot of rock will be used to build and decorate the building; not the warm, lodge feeling initially discussed. Mr. Hagemann would be interested in having a wall designed to place temporary art displays or other public activities. The Commission members thanked staff for the update. City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4i) Page 4 Title: Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting Minutes of December 3, 2014 5. New Business a. Discuss Calendar and Goals for 2015 Members discussed goals for 2015. Most items will remain the same except will add “Environmental and Stewardship” as a goal. Final will be approved at their January meeting. b. West End – Central Park West Development (Sean Walther) Mr. Walther, Senior Planner, advised the Commission of a preliminary plat application from DLC Residential for Central Park West. This is an amendment to a proposal the Commission has seen in the past. The land in discussion is located between Utica Avenue and Highway 100 which is currently a vacant parcel. Duke Realty was the developer at West End but their company has been divesting. LC Residential is now interested in acquiring the land east of the West End. The Olive Garden has four years left on their lease. It is assumed when their lease expires, other opportunities for them will arise. Staff is asking the Commission to review the park dedication. In this case, staff recommends cash in lieu of park land dedication. Mr. Walther indicated that overall, West End paid park dedication but the City waived a portion of the park dedication fee. Initially, Duke Realty proposed four, nine-story office towers plus a parking structure in that area. DLC Residential now proposes six-story apartments which would open up more green space. The design is conceptual at this time but some public areas will be included. The proposal would create 363 residential units. Mr. Walther indicated the current park dedication fees would be $291,552 and $64,575 in trail dedication fees. Members discussed and are in favor of accepting the fees. It was moved by Commission member Hageman to approve acceptance of park dedication fees in the amount of $291,552 and $64,575 in trail dedication fees from DLC Residential for the Central Park West development; Commission member Worthington seconded. The motion passed 6 – 0. c. Membership Reappointment (Stacy Voelker) Ms. Voelker congratulated Commission members Ms. Foulkes and Mr. Foulkes for their reappointment to the Commission for another three year term. Commission member Worthington advised of his resignation from the Commission. Mr. Worthington provided and overview of this time on the Commission and indicated he will be dedicating his time to coach tennis. Members wished him farewell. d. Elect Officials for 2015 Commission members discussed election of officials for 2015. Commission member Worthington moved that Ms. Griffin be elected chair and Ms. Foulkes serve as vice chair for 2015; Commission member Hagemann seconded. The motion passed 6 – 0. City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4i) Page 5 Title: Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting Minutes of December 3, 2014 6. Staff Communication Mr. West advised the city received a grant from MRPF (Minnesota Recreation Professional Foundation) to add signage on adult fitness to the playground equipment in the parks. Staff teamed up with Ramsey County by using their components and our communication department. Signage will be added to playground equipment showing how adults can utilize the equipment for their fitness needs. Ms. Walsh indicated a local resident completed a workout on the playground equipment then used open space to do additional training. There is also a Mom’s on the Run group and Boot Camp where adults utilize the playground equipment for exercise advised Mr. West. Mr. West updated members that Turkey Bingo had approximately 40 participants. The U.G.L.Y. Sweater Dash will be held this Sunday and registration is good. Mr. Beane updated the Commission that two crews are flooding the ice rinks day and night for the past two weeks. The rinks are looking good and the buildings are ready for the season. The city received a request from a resident near Center Park to add a shelter at that park. As Center Park is a busy neighborhood park, staff repurposed soccer goals, with $400 in materials, to create a wind shelter for participants. Minnehaha Creek now has a paved trail from Japs Olson to the Municipal Service Center, Mr. Beane advised. A lot of soil corrections were needed on site prior to a hard freeze. The boardwalk is 95% complete and the trail will be completed in the spring so it will not flood. The Bass Lake Preserve Restoration project is underway by the Engineering Department, Mr. Beane indicated. A public meeting is scheduled for December 17. The Engineering Department will visit with the Commission at an upcoming meeting to present the large project. The holiday lights at Oak Hill Park, Mr. Beane announced, were turned on the evening prior to Thanksgiving. Residents provided numerous compliments on the lights. Mr. West will work with Channel 9 to prepare a newscast at Oak Hill Park. Mr. West advised staff and the Communications Department are currently working on rebranding of publications. The new brand will be shown in the Spring/Summer brochure and future publications. 7. Member Communication Mr. Hagemann updated the Commission on Friends of the Arts. The Arts and Culture Committee met and provided recommendations which will go to the City Council December 15. Jim Brimeyer and John Basil are also on the committee. Friends of the Arts finished “Our Town” for 2014 which was an arts and nature theme. Ninety-nine mosaics were created through FOTA sponsored workshops and are on display at West End by the theater. The mosaic workshops filled quickly with a waiting list of over 200 families. The art show had a total of 250 total pieces submitted with approximately 70 of the pieces were submitted by St. Louis Park artists. Mr. Hawkinson inquired if the Pitch-A-Pumpkin collection was successful. Mr. West indicated it was a success! Mr. Hawkinson recommended adding a collection site at West End or another part of the city in the future. Staff noted recommendation. City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4i) Page 6 Title: Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting Minutes of December 3, 2014 8. Other / Future Agenda Items In January, the Commission will review and approve the 2015 goals. At a future meeting, staff will invite Phil Elkin from Engineering for an overview of the Bass Lake Preserve project. 9. Adjournment It was moved by Commission member Foulkes and seconded by Commission member Hagemann to adjourn at 8:23 p.m. The motion passed 6 – 0. Respectfully submitted, Stacy Voelker Stacy Voelker Recording Secretary Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: March 2, 2015 Consent Agenda Item: 4j EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Final Payment Resolution - Contract 59-11 – Fransen Decorating - Project Nos. 2008- 3001 & 2008-3002 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution authorizing final payment in the amount of $5,634.45 and accepting work for Fire Stations No. 1 and No. 2 Work Scope 18 (Painting) for Project Nos. 2008-3001 and 2008-3002, City Contract No. 59-11. POLICY CONSIDERATION: None. SUMMARY: Bids were received on March 31, 2011 for Two New Fire Stations – Project Nos. 2008-3001 and 2008-3002. The projects included construction of Fire Station No. 1 at 3750 Wooddale Avenue and Fire Station No. 2 at 2262 Louisiana Avenue. The City used an agency construction manager (CM) delivery method for both fire stations, rather than a general contractor (GM). With this approach, the City is the owner and general contractor for the project. The construction manager acts as the city’s advisor and representative throughout planning, design and construction of the stations. There were 31 contracts related to the construction of the two stations. Of the 31 contracts, 30 have previously been closed. This is the last open construction contract remaining. City Council awarded the contract for Work Scope 18 (Painting) for Fire Stations No. 1 and No. 2 to Fransen Decorating Inc. on April 11, 2011, in the amount of $88,689.00. The contractor completed this work at a final contract cost of $89,889.00. The $1,200.00 difference was due to owner authorized additional work at both stations. NEXT STEPS: Staff will prepare a closeout report regarding the Fire Station Project along with the final project costs. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The Fire Stations Project was programmed in the Capital Improvement Program for construction in 2011/12 at a total projected cost of $15,500,000. The final project costs will be less than the $15,100,000 estimated after construction bids were received. $12.5 million of the project costs will be paid from bond proceeds issued in December 2010. The remaining portion will be paid from the Fire portion of the Police and Fire Pension Fund. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution Prepared by: Sean Walther, Senior Planner Reviewed by: Steve Koering, Fire Chief Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4j) Page 2 Title: Final Payment Resolution – Contract 59-11 – Fransen Decorating – Projs 2008-3001 & 2008-3002 RESOLUTION NO. 15 -____ RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING FINAL PAYMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,634.45 AND ACCEPTING THE PAINTING WORK FOR FIRE STATIONS NO. 1 AND NO. 2 WITH FRANSEN DECORATING INC. CITY PROJECT NO. 2008-3001 & 2008-3002 CONTRACT NO. 59-11 NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Pursuant to a written contract with the City dated April 12, 2011, Fransen Decorating, Inc. satisfactorily completed Work Scope 18 (Painting) for Fire Stations No. 1 and No. 2, as per Contract No. 59-11. 2. The Construction Manager Kraus-Anderson Construction Company recommends final acceptance of the work. 3. The work completed under this contract is accepted and approved. The City Manager is directed to make final payment on the contract, taking the contractor's receipt in full. Original Contract Price $88,689.00 Change Order #1 $1,200.00 Final Contract Amount $89,889.00 Previous Payments ($84,254.55) Balance Due $5,634.45 Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council April 6, 2015 City Manager Mayor Attest: City Clerk Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 6, 2015 Consent Agenda Item: 4k EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Park Nicollet EpicCare Link Access for Post Discharge Visit Program RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to approve an agreement with Park Nicollet to allow Fire Department personnel to have access to the electronic patient record system within Park Nicollet. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Is the proposed agreement consistent with continuing the pilot Post Discharge Visit Program? SUMMARY: Due to the continued growth of the Park Nicollet Post Discharge Visit Program, it has been determined that in order to enhance security of patient information, increase efficiencies and to facilitate better tracking of patient information, that the Fire Department should have access to the electronic patient record through a controlled portal, and within an area specifically designed for the program. This access will be limited to specific approved personnel. The City Attorney has reviewed the documents and has approved them. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: None at this time VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: EpicCare Link System Access Agreement Prepared by: Steve Koering, Fire Chief Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4k) Page 2 Title: Park Nicollet EpicCare Link Access for Post Discharge Visit Program EPICCARE LINK SYSTEM ACCESS AGREEMENT FOR EXTERNAL CARE PROVIDER THIS AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is made effective as of April 6, 2015 (“Effective Date”), by and between Park Nicollet Health Services, a Minnesota non-profit corporation, with its principal place of business at 6500 Excelsior Blvd, St. Louis Park, MN 55426 (“Park Nicollet Health Services”), and City of St Louis Park, with its principal place of business at 5005 Minnetonka Blvd St Louis Park MN 55416 (“Provider”) (collectively, the “Parties” or separately, a “Party”). BACKGROUND A. Park Nicollet Health Services’ Epic electronic health record system (the “EHR”) is used to create and maintain certain records of Park Nicollet Health Services health care services and other patient information (the “EHR Records”). B. The Parties serve patients in the same community, and many patients are patients of both Parties. With the goal of improving the coordination and continuity of care for these shared patients, Park Nicollet Health Services will make available to Provider limited access to the EHR, subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. In consideration of the above and the following mutual covenants, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows: AGREEMENT Section 1. EHR Access 1.1 Grant and Scope of Access. Subject to the terms of and as limited by this Agreement, Park Nicollet Health Services hereby grants Provider non-transferable and non- exclusive access to the EHR to permit Authorized Users (as defined in Section 1.6) to electronically access and use the EHR solely for viewing EHR Records necessary for the purposes described in Schedule 1.1. Such purposes are limited to the current treatment of Provider’s patients and related payment and healthcare operations purposes (as those terms are defined in HIPAA, at 45 C.F.R. Pts. 160 – 164), as more specifically described in Schedule 1.1. Access, use or disclosure for any other purposes (including but not limited to research, fundraising, and marketing) are expressly prohibited. The scope of an Authorized User’s access to the EHR is limited to “read only” access (i.e., an Authorized User will be able to view and print, but not modify, EHR Records). Provider will ensure that its Authorized Users do not access the EHR for any purpose or in any manner not specifically authorized by this Agreement. 1.1.1 Revocation of Prior Agreements. Except as expressly provided in this Agreement, as of the Effective Date, this Agreement supersedes and replaces any existing agreements (whether oral or written) related to Provider’s access to, or the terms and conditions of Provider’s access to, the EHR. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Section 1.1.1 does not apply to EHR access by persons who have such access because they hold clinical privileges as members of the medical staff of a hospital in the Park Nicollet Health Services system. City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4k) Page 3 Title: Park Nicollet EpicCare Link Access for Post Discharge Visit Program 1.2 No License Granted. Park Nicollet Health Services licenses certain software products from Epic to maintain and operate the EHR. The grant of EHR access to Provider under this Agreement is limited by Park Nicollet Health Services’ underlying licensing agreement with Epic and does not grant and will not be construed as granting to Provider a license for the use of any software products. This Agreement does not transfer to Provider any title or ownership rights to EHR, EHR Records, or any rights in patents, copyrights, trademarks, or trade secrets encompassed in the EHR or any other Park Nicollet Health Services system, software or data. Provider agrees that it will not and will not attempt to reverse engineer or otherwise obtain copies of the software programs contained in the EHR or other Park Nicollet Health Services systems. 1.3 EpicCare Link; Manner of Access. Park Nicollet Health Services, in its sole discretion, will determine the tools it will provide to Provider for Provider to access EHR Records, and will determine what EHR Record data is made available to Provider. 1.4 System Requirements for Access. Provider acknowledges and agrees that any hardware, software, network access or other system components necessary for Provider to access and use the EHR will be procured, installed and maintained by Provider at its sole expense. 1.5 Security Obligations. Provider will implement safeguards that are reasonable and appropriate to prohibit and prevent Authorized Users from accessing, using, or disclosing EHR Records not specifically permitted by this Agreement. Provider will also implement reasonable and appropriate administrative, physical and technical safeguards that protect the confidentiality, integrity and availability of the EHR Records. Park Nicollet Health Services assumes no obligation to, but reserves the right to, audit Provider’s security practices relevant to this Agreement. Provider agrees to cooperate with Park Nicollet Health Services’ conduct of such audits and to promptly address any concerns reasonably identified by Park Nicollet Health Services. 1.6 Authorized Users. It is the responsibility of Provider to select and qualify one or more persons that Provider wishes to be granted access to the EHR System and to use the EHR System on behalf of Provider (once approved, the “Authorized Users”). Except as expressly provided for in this Agreement, Authorized Users are limited to (a) licensed, registered or certified medical and clinical personnel (e.g., MD, RN, LPN, NA, CMA, PA) and (b) administrative personnel. All Authorized Users must be members of the Workforce of Provider. “Workforce,” as used herein, shall have the meaning set forth at 45 C.F.R. 106.103. Provider’s request that an individual be authorized as an Authorized User constitutes Provider’s representation that the individual is (a) a member of Provider’s Workforce (and not a business associate) who (b) needs EHR access to perform assigned job functions for Provider. 1.7 Security Request Process. Provider will designate a Site Administrator. The Site Administrator will submit the requests to add Authorized Users to Park Nicollet Health Services in writing on a form or by a process provided by Park Nicollet Health Services. The Authorized Requester must promptly deactivate Authorized Users in the event of any change of circumstances requiring termination of an Authorized User’s EHR access (for example, termination of employment, disqualification as an Authorized User, or change in job function). Furthermore, Park Nicollet Health Services reserves the right to suspend or terminate the EHR access of any Authorized User at any time for any reason. Site Administrator will ensure that only appropriate persons are granted access to the EHR, will periodically audit the roster of City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4k) Page 4 Title: Park Nicollet EpicCare Link Access for Post Discharge Visit Program Authorized Users to ensure that the terms of this Agreement are being met, and will promptly respond to all reasonable inquiries from Park Nicollet Health Services. 1.8 Authentication. Provider and each Authorized User are jointly responsible for keeping and maintaining the security of the passwords or other assigned authentication mechanisms. An Authorized User may not share an assigned password with any other person, or use the assigned password of any other person, whether for one-time access or ongoing access. All Authorized Users will be required to execute a User Agreement. 1.9 Training. Park Nicollet Health Services will provide one-time training in EHR functionality to Site Administrator (or other person mutually agreed by the Parties) who will then be responsible for training all other Authorized Users. Provider will ensure that, prior to accessing the EHR, each Authorized User is trained, consistent with the Park Nicollet Health Services training and with this Agreement, regarding Provider’s and Authorized User’s obligations under this Agreement and applicable laws. Provider will further ensure that ongoing training of Authorized Users is conducted, as needed. Park Nicollet Health Services reserves the right to require Provider to provide additional training that Park Nicollet Health Services deems reasonably necessary and appropriate. 1.10 Policies and Procedures. Provider will comply with all applicable provisions of Park Nicollet Health Services’ Information Services policies governing EHR access and use, including but not limited to policies governing password controls. Park Nicollet Health Services will provide copies of these Information Services policies to Provider. 1.11 Auditing and Monitoring by Provider. Provider must audit and monitor access to and usage of the EHR to the full extent required to satisfy its legal responsibilities (as a HIPAA covered entity and otherwise), comply with this Agreement, and ensure that Authorized Users access, use, and disclose EHR Records only as authorized by this Agreement. Park Nicollet Health Services assumes no obligation to audit or monitor Provider behavior with respect to the EHR, but may require Provider to follow a reasonable auditing and/or monitoring protocol if Park Nicollet Health Services determines that it would be appropriate to address its obligations as a covered entity. In addition, Park Nicollet Health Services reserves the right to independently monitor and audit Authorized Users’ behavior and usage of the EHR and to immediately suspend an Authorized User’s access to the EHR, if Park Nicollet Health Services reasonably suspects or believes that Provider or Authorized User has violated the terms of this Agreement or is otherwise the cause of harm or interference with Park Nicollet Health Services’ rights or property related to the EHR or the rights or property of others related to the EHR. Provider will cooperate with Park Nicollet Health Services in any additional monitoring or auditing deemed necessary by Park Nicollet Health Services and conducted by Park Nicollet Health Services or Provider. Provider will fully and promptly cooperate with Park Nicollet Health Services in resolving any privacy or security issues identified by such monitoring or auditing. 1.12 Unauthorized Use or Disclosure; Complaints. Provider will immediately notify Park Nicollet Health Services in writing when it becomes aware of any of the following: (a) any Security Incident (as defined by HIPAA at 45 CFR Pts 160 - 164); (b) any actual or suspected unauthorized access, use or disclosure of EHR Records; or (c) any complaint from a patient or other person involving alleged inappropriate use, access or disclosure of EHR Records or other confidential information of Park Nicollet Health Services. Each Party will cooperate with each other, as necessary and appropriate, to investigate any complaints, any actual or suspected City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4k) Page 5 Title: Park Nicollet EpicCare Link Access for Post Discharge Visit Program unauthorized access, use or disclosure of the EHR Records, any Security Incident, or any actual or suspected violation of this Agreement. Provider, in consultation with Park Nicollet Health Services, will take prompt corrective action at Provider’s own expense to mitigate and cure any harmful effect that is known to Provider of any unauthorized access, use, disclosure of EHR Records or any Security Incident related to the EHR that is caused by or attributable to Provider or Authorized Users. Provider shall reimburse Park Nicollet Health Services for all reasonable costs incurred by Park Nicollet Health Services in investigating an unauthorized use or disclosure or a complaint, and all reasonable costs incurred by Park Nicollet Health Services to provide breach notifications or to mitigate or cure any harmful effects resulting from an unauthorized use or disclosure or a Security Incident. Provider further agrees to reimburse Park Nicollet Health Services for any and all fines and/or administrative penalties imposed for such unauthorized access, use or disclosure, Security Incident, or for delayed reporting. The provisions of this Section 1.12 will survive the termination of this Agreement. City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4k) Page 6 Title: Park Nicollet EpicCare Link Access for Post Discharge Visit Program Section 2. Additional Terms and Conditions 2.1 Disclaimer of Warranty; Limitation of Liability. PARK NICOLLET HEALTH SERVICES NEITHER MAKES, NOR WILL BE DEEMED TO HAVE MADE, ANY WARRANTY OR REPRESENTATION OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, AS TO THE DESIGN, CONDITION, QUALITY, CAPACITY, OR OTHER ASPECT OF ANY OF THE SERVICES PROVIDED HEREUNDER OR ANY COMPONENT THEREOF, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY DATA, SYSTEM, SOFTWARE, PERSONNEL, PROGRAMMING ASSISTANCE, OR CONSULTATION PROVIDED AS A PART OF SUCH SERVICES, OR WARRANTIES ARISING FROM STATUTE, COURSE OF DEALING, COURSE OF PERFORMANCE OR USAGE OF TRADE. ALL SUCH WARRANTIES ARE HEREBY EXCLUDED. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES WILL PARK NICOLLET HEALTH SERVICESBE LIABLE TO PROVIDER FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, EXEMPLARY, PUNITIVE OR SPECIAL DAMAGES OF ANY NATURE OR KIND WHATSOEVER (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, LOST PROFITS OR SAVINGS, LOST DATA, LOST BUSINESS, LOSS OF USE, OR LOST REVENUES) EVEN IF PARK NICOLLET HEALTH SERVICES HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES OR KNEW OF OR SHOULD HAVE KNOWN OF THE LIKELIHOOD OF SUCH DAMAGES, AND NOT WITHSTANDING THE FORM (E.G., CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY, OR OTHERWISE) IN WHICH ANY LEGAL OR EQUITABLE ACTION MAY BE BROUGHT AGAINST IT. 2.2 Clinical Practice. Provider assumes sole responsibility for all clinical decision- making and services provided by Provider and Authorized Users arising from, related to or in connection with the access, use, or disclosure of EHR Records. Provider agrees to use the EHR only in accordance with applicable standards of good clinical practice. 2.3 Assumption of Liability. Provider will ensure that Authorized User access to the EHR Records is only for legitimate business purposes and as permitted this Agreement and applicable law. Provider is responsible and liable for each Authorized User fully complying with this Agreement and applicable law. Provider assumes full responsibility and liability for actions or omissions related to the access to and use of the EHR by Provider’s Authorized Users or any other person Provider permits (intentionally or unintentionally) to have access to the EHR, including but not limited to unauthorized access to, use of or disclosure of EHR Records that results from Provider’s or an Authorized User’s failure to keep the assigned passwords secure. 2.4 Indemnification. Provider agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Park Nicollet Health Services and its affiliates and their respective officers, directors, employees, agents, successors and assigns from any and all claims, liabilities, judgments, fines, assessments, penalties, awards or other expenses, of any kind or nature whatsoever, including, without limitation, attorneys’ fees, expert witness fees, and costs of investigation, litigation or dispute resolution, relating to or arising out of Provider’s use of the EHR, or Provider’s acts or omissions or willful misconduct under this Agreement, including but not limited to Provider’s impermissible access to, use or disclosure of EHR Records or other Park Nicollet Health Services data, or the introduction of viruses or other harmful contaminant into the EHR or other Park Nicollet Health Services system by virtue of Provider’s access. 2.5 Representations and Warranties of Provider. Provider represents and warrants that it will, at all times during the term of the Agreement ensure that each Authorized User City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4k) Page 7 Title: Park Nicollet EpicCare Link Access for Post Discharge Visit Program complies with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, applicable law, and applicable Park Nicollet Health Services and Provider policies and procedures as may be amended from time to time, and to ensure that no Authorized User takes any action that adversely affects or damages the EHR, EHR data or any other system or data file of Park Nicollet Health Services. Provider further represents and warrants that it has in place and will appropriately implement disciplinary measures and sanctions against Authorized Users known to have violated the terms of this Agreement, applicable law or applicable Park Nicollet Health Services or Provider policies or procedures, or to have taken any action adversely affecting or damaging the EHR, EHR data or any other system or data file of Park Nicollet Health Services. Provider further represents and warrants that it will at all times during the term of this Agreement have in place a qualified Privacy Officer and Security Officer, as required by HIPAA. Provider will promptly notify Park Nicollet Health Services of any change to the persons appointed to these positions. 2.6 Survival. This Section 2 will survive termination of this Agreement. Section 3. Confidentiality. 3.1 Confidentiality of Patient Records; Consent. The Parties will protect the confidentiality and security of the EHR Records to the full extent required by applicable law. If Park Nicollet Health Services determines it to be necessary, the Parties will cooperate to obtain the patient’s consent, which may include, for example, Provider obtaining the patient’s written consent. If Provider represents to Park Nicollet Health Services that it has obtained a legally valid consent from the patient (or patient’s authorized representative), the Parties agree that Park Nicollet Health Services may rely on that representation but may also request a copy from Provider. 3.2 Requests for EHR Records. If Provider receives any request for copies of or access to EHR Records from any third party, including requests from patients, Provider will not provide such copies or access but will promptly direct the requester to Park Nicollet Health Services. 3.3 Other Confidential Information. During the course of the performance of this Agreement, the Parties may have access to or become acquainted with confidential information relating to each other’s business, including, without limitation, patient lists, proprietary information, trade secrets and other intellectual property, non-public information, clinical, marketing, personnel and administrative policies, procedures, manuals and reports, and written agreements, including this Agreement. The Parties acknowledge and understand the importance of keeping such information, including the terms of this Agreement, confidential and agree never to use, except in performing their respective duties under this Agreement, or to disclose such information to any third party except as may be required by a court or administrative order or except, with respect to Park Nicollet Health Services, to an entity that controls, is controlled by or is under common control with, directly or indirectly, Park Nicollet Health Services. If disclosure is ordered by a court or administrative order, the Party subject to the order will immediately notify the other Party. Upon termination of this Agreement, each Party will immediately return to the other Party all records or other tangible documents that contain, embody or disclose, in whole or in part any confidential information. 3.4 Survival. This Section 3 will survive termination of this Agreement. Section 4. Term and Termination. City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4k) Page 8 Title: Park Nicollet EpicCare Link Access for Post Discharge Visit Program 4.1 Term. This Agreement will commence on the Effective Date and continue until terminated as provided below. 4.2 Termination. This Agreement may be terminated for any reason or no reason at any time by a Party, upon written notice to the other Party. Notwithstanding the termination of this Agreement, the Parties will be required to perform under those provisions hereof which contemplate performance subsequent to termination. Termination of this Agreement will not affect any liabilities or obligations that exist prior to or occur by reason of such termination, including but not limited to liability for damages for breach of this Agreement. Section 5. Miscellaneous. 5.1 Contact Persons. The Parties will use their best efforts to support an effective working relationship with each other as it relates to the terms and conditions of this Agreement and any other concerns that may arise between the Parties. Each Party will designate a primary contact person and certain additional contact persons for specific communications, as listed in Schedule 5.1 of this Agreement. The “Primary Contacts” listed in Schedule 5.1 will serve as the primary administrative contacts that either Party will go through to address issues of concern that may arise between the Parties relating to matters addressed in this Agreement and will also serve as the backup contact to any of the other contacts listed in Schedule 5.1. 5.2 Assignment. Provider may not assign, delegate, or otherwise transfer any right or obligation under this Agreement without the prior written consent of Park Nicollet Health Services. Any attempted assignment or transfer without Park Nicollet Health Services’ consent is ineffective. 5.3 Amendment. The Agreement may be amended only by a writing signed by the Parties. 5.4 Governing Law, Jurisdiction and Venue. The Agreement will be governed by and interpreted under Minnesota law without regard to choice of law principles. Any lawsuit arising directly or indirectly out of the Agreement will be brought in a court of competent jurisdiction located in the State of Minnesota. 5.5 Non-Waiver. The rights and remedies of the Parties are cumulative and not alternative. Neither the failure nor any delay by any Party in exercising any right under this Agreement or the documents referred to in this Agreement will operate as a waiver of such right, and no single or partial exercise of any such right will preclude any other or further exercise of such right or the exercise of any other right. 5.6 Entire Agreement; Severability. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties with respect to the matters contemplated herein and supersedes all previous and contemporaneous oral and written negotiations, commitments, and understandings relating thereto. The Agreement will be interpreted in a way that if any provision is held invalid, the rest of the Agreement will remain in full affect unless the invalid provision would materially alter a Party’s interests or materially affect its ability to perform under the Agreement. 5.7 Legal Notices. Except as otherwise provided, any notice or other communication provided for by this Agreement must be in writing and will be deemed given or delivered when personally delivered or when deposited in the United States mail, certified or registered, return receipt requested, postage prepaid and properly addressed, or by recognized overnight courier, City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4k) Page 9 Title: Park Nicollet EpicCare Link Access for Post Discharge Visit Program next day delivery, charges prepaid, or if given by facsimile, upon evidence of transmission of facsimile, followed by registered or certified mail, addressed to the intended recipients as identified in the Legal Notices section of Schedule 5.1, or to such other person or address as may be designated by written notice by one Party to the other Party given from time to time during the term of this Agreement. 5.8 Construction. Unless otherwise expressly provided, the word “including” does not limit the proceeding words or terms. Any reference to a statute or regulation means that statute or regulation as amended or supplemented from time to time and any corresponding provisions of successor statutes or regulations unless context requires otherwise. The section headings contained in the Agreement are for reference purposes only and will not in any way affect the meaning or interpretation of the Agreement. The Agreement will be construed in accordance with the plain meaning of its terms, and no presumption or inference will be made against a Party responsible for drafting any provision. 5.9 Signatures and Counterparts. The Agreement may be executed by any form of signature authorized by law. Each counterpart will be deemed an original copy of the Agreement and, when taken together, will be deemed to constitute one and the same agreement. 5.10 Exhibits; Schedules. All exhibits, schedules and attachments, attached hereto, and Park Nicollet Health Services Information Services policies, as each may be amended from time to time, shall be and hereby are incorporated into this Agreement by this reference. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Park Nicollet Health Services and Provider have each caused this Agreement to be executed in their respective names by their duly authorized representatives, as of the day and year first above written. PARK NICOLLET HEALTH SERVICES [PROVIDER] _________________________________ ____ ____________________________________ __ Signature Signature _________________________________ ____ ____________________________________ __ Printed name Tom Harmening _________________________________ ____ ____________________________________ __ Title City Manager _________________________________ ____ ____________________________________ ___ Date Date City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4k) Page 10 Title: Park Nicollet EpicCare Link Access for Post Discharge Visit Program Schedule 1.1 Description of Permitted Purposes DRAFTER’S NOTES: Describe the specific purposes for which Provider will be accessing the EHR. E.g., explain which categories of users at Provider get access, what types of records will they access, which patients’ records will they access, and why? All of these purposes must fall within the general categories of treatment, payment or healthcare operations, AND must be either (1) permitted by state & federal law without patient consent; or (2) within the scope of Park Nicollet Health Services standard patient consent form. City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4k) Page 11 Title: Park Nicollet EpicCare Link Access for Post Discharge Visit Program Schedule 5.1 Contact Persons As of the Effective Date, the contact persons for each Party are as follows: PROVIDER PARK NICOLLET HEALTH SERVICES Primary Contact: Name/Title Address Phone Email For all contacts except as noted below. Benjamin Anderson, Manager Care Coordinator & Care Integration Care Integration Heart and Vascular Center Methodist Hospital G-655 3800 Park Nicollet Blvd. St. Louis Park, MN 55416 952-993-3157 benjamin.anderson@parknicollet.com For all contacts except as noted below Security Administration: Site Administrator: Name/Title Address Phone Email Privacy Officer: Name/Title Address Phone Email Tobi Tanzer, VP Integrity and Compliance PNHS MS 21110X PO Box 1309 Minneapolis, MN 55440-1309 Phone: 952.883.5195 Email: Tobi.X.Tanzer@HealthPartners.com Notify of any privacy incidents or complaints Security Officer: Name/Title Address Phone Email Alan Abramson SVP and CIO HealthPartners MS 21110A PO Box 1309 Minneapolis, MN 55440-1309 Phone: 952.883.7883 Email: Alan.V.Abramson@HealthPartners.com Notify of any security incidents Legal Notices Name/Title Address Phone Email Julie Flaschenriem VP and CIO Park Nicollet Health Services 3800 Park Nicollet Blvd. St. Louis Park, MN 55416 952-993-9864 Julie.Flaschenriem@ParkNicollet.com With a copy to: HealthPartners, Inc. Attn: General Counsel 8170 33rd Avenue South Bloomington, MN 55425 Each Party will promptly communicate any changes to this contact information to the other Party. Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 6, 2015 Consent Agenda Item: 4l EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Resolution Supporting: Oppidan, Inc.’s Submission of a Grant Application to the Hennepin County Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Program for its proposed redevelopment project at 4760 and 4900 Excelsior Boulevard (Former Bally’s Site and EDA property). RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Approve a Resolution of Support for Oppidan’s submission of a grant application to the Hennepin County Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Program for its proposed “Bally’s” redevelopment project. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council support Oppidan’s application for a $1,000,000 TOD grant to facilitate its proposed mixed-use redevelopment at 4760 and 4900 Excelsior Blvd? SUMMARY: Oppidan Inc. plans to acquire both the Bally’s site at 4900 Excelsior Blvd and EDA’s property at 4760 Excelsior Blvd. The developer proposes to demolish and replace the vacant, former Bally’s building with a new mixed use development consisting of a 28,000 square foot grocery retail space and 189 apartment units (including 20 affordable units). This redevelopment concept was last presented to Council at the Study Session on October 27, 2104. The developer is now in the process of applying for tax increment financing, a preliminary plat and a preliminary PUD which is tentatively scheduled for City Council consideration in May. Oppidan has applied for a $1,000,000 TOD grant for the project to assist with costs related to acquisition of property, demolition, and public improvements including sidewalks. Hennepin County requires an authorizing resolution from the governing body of the city where the project site is located indicating that the city supports the grant application. Grant awards are typically announced by June. A letter of support for this application does not commit the City Council to any of the plat or zoning approvals requested from the City for the development. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: This grant program does not require any financial match from the city. Oppidan Inc. is the grant applicant and should funds be awarded, Oppidan will work directly with Hennepin County to administer the grant. VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a well-maintained and diverse housing stock. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Grant Application Resolution of Support Prepared by: Julie Grove, Planning and Economic Development Assistant Reviewed by: Greg Hunt, Economic Development Coordinator Michele Schnitker, Housing Supervisor Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager and EDA Executive Director City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 4l) Page 2 Title: Resolution Supporting Oppidan Inc. Application for Hennepin Cnty. TOD Grant-4760 & 4900 Excelsior Blvd. RESOLUTION NO. 15-___ RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT OF AN APPLICATION FOR A HENNEPIN COUNTY TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) GRANT SUBMITTED BY OPPIDAN INC. FOR REDEVELOMENT AT 4760 AND 4900 EXCELSIOR BOULEVARD WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park acknowledges the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners has authorized approximately $2 million in the 2015 budget for transit oriented development (TOD) projects; and WHEREAS, Oppidan wishes to submit an application requesting grant funds from the Hennepin County Transit Oriented Development Program; and WHEREAS, the grant funds will be used for certain Public Improvement Costs associated with the proposed redevelopment project at 4760 and 4900 Excelsior Boulevard in the City of St. Louis Park; and WHEREAS, the Hennepin County Transit Oriented Development Program Guidelines require support by the governing body of the City of St. Louis Park for submission of a grant application to the Hennepin County Transit Oriented Development Program; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of St. Louis Park, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 383B.77, subd. 3., supports the submission of a Transit Oriented Development Program grant application to the Hennepin County Housing and Redevelopment Authority by Oppidan Inc. for the proposed development. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council April 6, 2015 City Manager Mayor Attest City Clerk Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 6, 2015 Public Hearing Agenda Item: 6a EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Central Park West - Public Hearing and First Reading of Ordinances Vacating Easements and Right-of-Way RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: • Mayor to close public hearing. • Motion to approve First Reading of an Ordinance Vacating a Public Sewer Easement and Sewer Construction Easements and set the Second Reading of Ordinance for April 20, 2015. • Motion to approve First Reading of an Ordinance vacating right-of-way and set the Second Reading of Ordinance for April 20, 2015. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Are the easements or right-of-way needed for public purposes? SUMMARY: The Central Park West redevelopment site is located at 1511 Utica Ave South. City Council approved a preliminary plat that will subdivide the parcel into 3 lots and one outlot, and a preliminary planned unit development (PUD) for two multiple-family residential buildings, a future hotel, and two future office towers. Final plat and final PUD actions are also on this same meeting agenda. In order for building permits to be issued, certain easements and right-of- way on the property need to be vacated. The applicant requests the City vacate a Public Sewer Easement and Sewer Construction Easements on the property. The existing public sewer line will be relocated to Utica Avenue South as part of the first phase of the redevelopment. Staff supports the proposed vacations. A condition of approval will be that the ordinance shall not be effective until the relocated public sewer is installed and accepted by the City. The applicant also requests the City vacate road right-of-way along Utica Avenue South. The application applies to an 82-foot long area on the east side of the road that was previously planned for an on-street parking bay. The plan changed and the parking bay is not needed. Legal descriptions and depictions of the subject areas are included in the attached ordinances. A public hearing is required and a second reading of the ordinances will be scheduled for April 20, 2015. Five councilmembers must support the ordinances in order to vacate right-of-way or easements. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Draft Ordinances Prepared by: Sean Walther, Senior Planner Reviewed by: Michele Schnitker, Housing Supervisor Approved by: Tom Harmening , City Manager ORDINANCE NO._____-15 ORDINANCE VACATING A PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENT AND SEWER CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS AT 1511 UTICA AVENUE SOUTH THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK DOES ORDAIN: Section 1. A petition in writing signed by a majority of all of the owners of all property abutting upon both sides of the easements proposed to be vacated has been duly filed. The notice of said petition has been published in the St. Louis Park Sailor on March 26, 2015 and the City Council has conducted a public hearing upon said petition and has determined that the easements are not needed for public purposes, and that it is for the best interest of the public that said easements be vacated. Section 2. The easements described on attached Exhibit “A” and depicted on Exhibit “B” as now dedicated and laid out within the corporate limits of the City of St. Louis Park are vacated. Section 3. The City Clerk is instructed to record certified copies of this ordinance in the Office of the Hennepin County Register of Deeds or Registrar of Titles as the case may be. Section 4. This Ordinance shall take effect upon relocation of the sewer and acceptance of the sewer by the City of St. Louis Park, but not less than fifteen days after its publication. First Reading April 6, 2015 Second Reading April 20, 2015 Date of Publication April 30, 2015 Date Ordinance may take effect May 15, 2015 Adopted by the City Council April 20, 2015 Reviewed for Administration City Manager Mayor Attest: Approved as to Form and Execution: City Clerk City Attorney City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 6a) Title: Central Park West - Public Hearing and First Reading of Ordinances Vacating Easements and Right-of-Way Page 2 EXHIBIT “A” LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS That part of the following described sewer easement, recorded in Doc. No. 765858: A sewer easement in and across a strip of land 25 feet in width consisting of the East 25 feet of all that part of the E ½ of the NW ¼ of the SW ¼, Section 30, Township 29, Range 24, and an extension of the south half of Douglas Avenue west from State Highway No. 100 to a point 25 feet west of the east line of the SW ¼ of the SW ¼, said Section 30. Lying within Outlot A, THE SHOPS AT WEST END, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. That part of the following described sewer construction easement, recorded in Doc. No. 765858: A construction easement in and across a strip of land 50 feet in width consisting of the East 50 feet of all that part of the E ½ of the NW ¼ of the SW ¼, Section 30, Township 29, Range 24, and an extension of the south half of Douglas Avenue west from State Highway No. 100 to a point 50 feet west of the east line of the SW ¼ of the SW ¼, said Section 30. Lying within Outlot A, THE SHOPS AT WEST END, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 6a) Title: Central Park West - Public Hearing and First Reading of Ordinances Vacating Easements and Right-of-Way Page 3 EXHIBIT B DENOTESEASEMENTAREATOBEVACATED 0 200 SCALEINFEET DLCRESIDENTIAL CENTRALPARKWEST ST.LOUISPARK Designed: Drawn: DL Approved: MFH Issued: 01282015 Rev.: Date: ExhibitNumber ProjectNo. City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 6a) Title: Central Park West - Public Hearing and First Reading of Ordinances Vacating Easements and Right-of-Way Page 4 ORDINANCE NO._____-15 ORDINANCE VACATING RIGHT-OF-WAY ADJACENT TO 1511 UTICA AVENUE SOUTH THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK DOES ORDAIN: Section 1. A petition in writing signed by a majority of all of the owners of all property abutting upon both sides of the right-of-way proposed to be vacated has been duly filed. The notice of said petition has been published in the St. Louis Park Sailor on March 26, 2015 and the City Council has conducted a public hearing upon said petition and has determined that the right-of-way is not needed for public purposes, and that it is for the best interest of the public that said right-of-way be vacated. Section 2. The easements described on attached Exhibit “A” and depicted on Exhibit “B” as now dedicated and laid out within the corporate limits of the City of St. Louis Park is vacated. Section 3. The City Clerk is instructed to record certified copies of this ordinance in the Office of the Hennepin County Register of Deeds or Registrar of Titles as the case may be. Section 4. This Ordinance shall take effect fifteen days after its publication. First Reading April 6, 2015 Second Reading April 20, 2015 Date of Publication April 30, 2015 Date Ordinance takes effect May 15, 2015 Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council April 20, 2015 City Manager Mayor Attest: Approved as to Form and Execution: City Clerk City Attorney City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 6a) Title: Central Park West - Public Hearing and First Reading of Ordinances Vacating Easements and Right-of-Way Page 5 EXHIBIT “A” LEGAL DESCRIPTION That part of Utica Avenue South, as dedicated on the plat of THE SHOPS AT WEST END, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the northwest corner of Outlot A, said plat; thence on an assumed bearing of South, along the west line of said Outlot A, a distance of 95.16 feet to a southwesterly corner of said Outlot A and the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence, continuing on a bearing of South, a distance of 81.53 feet to a northwesterly corner of said Outlot A, and said line there terminating. City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 6a) Title: Central Park West - Public Hearing and First Reading of Ordinances Vacating Easements and Right-of-Way Page 6 EXHIBIT B DESCRIPTION OF VACATED UTICA AVENUE SOUTH That part of Utica Avenue South, as dedicated on the plat of THE SHOPS AT WEST END, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the northwest corner of Outlot A, said plat; thence on an assumed bearing of South, along the west line of said Outlot A, a distance of 95.16 feet to a southwesterly corner of said Outlot A and the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence, continuing on a bearing of South, a distance of 81.53 feet to a northwesterly corner of said Outlot A, and said line there terminating. 0 30 SCALEINFEET DLCRESIDENTIAL CENTRALPARKWEST ST.LOUISPARK,MN RIGHTOFWAYVACATIONEXHIBIT Designed: Drawn: DL Approved: MFH Issued: 01292015 Rev.: Date: ExhibitNumber ProjectNo. City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 6a) Title: Central Park West - Public Hearing and First Reading of Ordinances Vacating Easements and Right-of-Way Page 7 Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 6, 2015 Action Agenda Item: 8a EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Confirm Appointment of Melissa Kennedy as City Clerk for the City of St. Louis Park RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution Confirming the Appointment of Melissa Kennedy to the Position of City Clerk POLICY CONSIDERATION: None at this time. SUMMARY: As Council is aware, City Clerk Nancy Stroth recently retired. After review of a high number of qualified applicants, we are pleased to inform you that Melissa Kennedy has accepted the position of City Clerk for the City of St. Louis Park. We are fortunate to have Melissa Kennedy accept our offer for the position of City Clerk. She brings to us extensive experience in her work with Inver Grove Heights as Deputy City Clerk. (Inver Grove Heights is a City Administrator form of government where the Administrator technically holds the title of City Clerk.) In her previous capacity as Deputy City Clerk, Melissa handled all the City Clerk duties including, and not limited to, city licensure programs in a number of areas and also liquor and gambling. She has a high level of experience with elections where she administered and supervised all election activities from training and recruitment of election judges to supervision of staff through all aspects of the election processes. Her work experience includes working with Council, Boards and Commissions, records management, ordinances, resolutions, bids, contracts and all other functions of a City Clerk. She also brings to us extensive experience in records management with maintenance of a city-wide electronic archival storage database, as well as handling data practices requests. Melissa is a Certified Municipal Clerk of Minnesota. City Charter Section 5.04 states “there shall be a City Clerk…” Section 5.02(b) under Powers and Duties of the City Manager, states, “with consent of the Council, the City Manager may appoint all department heads and other officers of the City”. The City Clerk designation is that of an “officer of the city” and requires Council consent. At this time, we seek confirmation from the Council of the appointment of Melissa Kennedy as City Clerk. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution Prepared by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8a) Page 2 Title: Confirm Appointment of Melissa Kennedy as City Clerk for the City of St. Louis Park RESOLUTION NO. 15-____ CONFIRMING THE APPOINTMENT OF MELISSA KENNEDY TO THE POSITION OF CITY CLERK WHEREAS, St. Louis Park City Charter Section 5.04 states there shall be a City Clerk and under 5.02(b) of the Charter it states that the City Manager may appoint the City Clerk, with the consent of the City Council, WHEREAS, the City Manager has reviewed the experience, service, education and professional development of Melissa Kennedy and as a result, wishes to appoint Melissa Kennedy to the position of City Clerk. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park that the decision of the City Manager to appoint Melissa Kennedy to the position of City Clerk is hereby confirmed. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council April 6, 2015 City Manager Mayor Attest: City Clerk Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 6, 2015 Action Agenda Item: 8b EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Environmentally Preferred Purchasing Policy RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt the Environmentally Preferred Purchasing Policy POLICY CONSIDERATION: Is the Environmentally Preferred Purchasing Policy consistent with the City Council’s adopted Strategic Direction related to being a leader in environmental stewardship? SUMMARY: The Environmentally Preferred Purchasing Policy is the outcome of the Environmentally Preferred Purchasing (EPP) workgroup of the Environment and Sustainability Commission (ESC) to meet the sustainability goals of the commission. The EPP workgroup was formed with the goal of looking at key areas in the City’s purchasing practices to determine if the City is making the most sustainable choices and develop ways to improve those practices. The group developed a draft policy and has spent the last six months meeting with City Staff on purchasing policies to tailor the document to be an effective tool towards meeting the City’s sustainability goals. The attached policy is the result of this effort. Rachel Harris, Mark Eilers, and Ryan Griffin, members of the workgroup will be at the Council meeting to discuss the proposed policy. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The proposed policy is anticipated to have minimal financial impacts. VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a leader in environmental stewardship. We will increase environmental consciousness and responsibility in all areas of city business. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Environmentally Preferred Purchasing Policy Prepared by: Phillip Elkin, Sr. Project Manager Reviewed by: Debra Heiser, Engineering Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8b) Page 2 Title: Environmentally Preferred Purchasing Policy City of St. Louis Park Environmentally Preferable Purchasing Policy I. PURPOSE AND SCOPE A. The goal of this policy is to encourage purchasing that reflects the City’s commitment to being an environmental and sustainability leader. This policy may be amended or superseded in the future to also include broader aspects of sustainability. These aspects may include, but are not limited to: local sourcing, ethical business practices, responsible treatment of workers, child labor prevention, human rights, safety and wellness, fair trade, transparency, economic equality and social justice. This policy for purchasing is adopted in order to: Promote environmental factors such as: • Conserving natural resources • Conserving energy • Minimizing environmental impacts such as pollution • Minimizing use of water • Reducing or eliminating toxins or toxic materials that create hazards to workers and our community • Supporting strong recycling markets • Reducing materials that are landfilled and incinerated • Creating a model for successfully purchasing environmentally preferable products that encourages other purchasers in our community to adopt similar goals Promote fiscal factors such as: • Decreasing lifecycle costs by acknowledging and incorporating full cost accounting (purchase, maintenance, disposal, staff time, and labor) • Minimizing waste and its associated costs B. This policy applies to all City departments and employees, vendors, contractors and grantees for all products and services provided to the City. C. This policy is subject to the requirements and preferences in the Municipal Contracting Law (MN. Statue 471.345), the St. Louis Park Purchasing Policy and all other applicable laws and ordinances. D. This policy adheres to or exceeds the Admin Minnesota Materials Management Division Environmentally Responsible Purchasing Policy: http://www.mmd.admin.state.mn.us/envir.htm. All Minnesota Legislative and Executive Order Requirements in the State policy shall be followed by the City of St. Louis Park unless superseded by this city policy. II. EFFECTIVE DATE This policy will take effect on June 1, 2015. City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8b) Page 3 Title: Environmentally Preferred Purchasing Policy III. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES A. Implementation All City departments are responsible for implementation of this policy and to ensure their respective employees and contractors are fully aware and supportive of the City’s policy to purchase environmentally preferable goods and services. All departments are suggested to: • Evaluate environmentally preferable products, whenever practical, to determine the extent to which they may be used by the department and its contractors. • Facilitate data collection, if requested, on purchases of designated environmentally preferable products by the department in order to assist the City Sustainability Coordinator. B. Responsible Parties The Sustainability Coordinator will administer this policy. Each department head will have the responsibility of ensuring adoption within his or her department and report any issues to the above party. C. Accountability Measures The City Sustainability Coordinator will work with all city departments to deliver a brief summary annually to Sustainable SLP, covering: • Status of this policy’s implementation • Informal data on purchases of environmentally preferable products • Financial implications of the policy, if any • Overall accomplishment and challenges • Recommendations for the future IV. GENERAL CONDITIONS A. Purchased Energy A.1. Conservation – It is recommended that lifecycle costs are considered in every new building or infrastructure project, retrofit or remodel requiring city capital. Lifecycle thinking should be employed when evaluating energy conserving purchases. For example, longer life and lower end of life impacts of LED lighting can offset initial price premium over fluorescent lighting. A ten- year payback for efficiency upgrades is a recommended standard, but could be amended based on future needs. Sample energy-saving purchases include, but are not limited to: • Energy performance contracting for existing buildings • More efficient technologies such as LED lighting for buildings and grounds • Daylight or motion sensor lighting • HVAC control systems • Passive solar heating / shading City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8b) Page 4 Title: Environmentally Preferred Purchasing Policy A.2. Renewable Electricity – It is recommended that the City will make every effort to purchase renewably generated electricity in all of its accounts, when economically feasible. Renewable power can often be purchased for less than 10% incremental cost, or could even yield a payback over time. The city should seek to understand the cost of fully eliminating its electricity-derived carbon footprint and establish goals to reach net zero. Current means of becoming carbon-neutral include but are not limited to: • Participation in Xcel Energy’s Windsource program • Large-scale solar energy purchasing agreements • Small-scale ‘community solar’ projects • The purchase of carbon offsets A.3. Purchased Fossil Fuels – It is recommended that the City will make every effort to offset the environmental impacts of its purchased fossil fuels when economically feasible. The city should understand the cost of offsetting its carbon emissions originating from: 1) natural gas, 2) gasoline, 3) diesel / fuel oil. Current means of becoming carbon neutral with respect to fossil fuels include but are not limited to: • Natural gas performance contracting for existing buildings • Participation in CenterPoint Energy’s Green Balance Program • The planned purchase of higher efficiency or plug-in electric vehicle fleets • Fuel switching from natural gas to renewables for buildings and infrastructure • The purchase of carbon offsets B. Source Reduction B.1. Products that are durable, long lasting, reusable or refillable are preferred. B.2. Vendors will be encouraged whenever practicable to take back and reuse pallets and packaging materials such as plastic bags, cardboard and similar materials. B.3. City will implement the goals of the new Protocol related to the Zero Waste Meetings out of the City’s Public Works Department as they relate to purchasing whenever practicable. C. Recycled Content Products C.1. It is recommended that printing paper, office paper and paper products will minimally meet the minimum recycled content standards established by the US EPA that meets the minimum recycled content standards established by the US EPA Comprehensive Procurement Guidelines. 100% post-consumer recycled content is strongly preferred if fiscally possible (within a 10% lifecycle cost increase over the aforementioned product, for example). Any non-recycled paper content should be certified by the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) or the Sustainable Forestry Initiative (SFI). C.2. It is recommended that janitorial paper products will minimally meet the minimum recycled content standards established by the US EPA and that meets the minimum recycled content standards established by the US EPA City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8b) Page 5 Title: Environmentally Preferred Purchasing Policy Comprehensive Procurement Guidelines. 100% post-consumer recycled content is strongly preferred if fiscally possible (within a 10% lifecycle cost increase over the aforementioned product, for example). Any non-recycled paper content should be certified by the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) or the Sustainable Forestry Initiative (SFI). D. Electronics D.1. The responsibility for this policy will be those City of St. Louis Park employees whose job functions include the operations management for city owned facilities (i.e., offices, garages, buildings) or purchasing of energy consuming equipment (i.e. Information Technology). These individuals are responsible for ensuring that this policy is executed and updated over time. D.2. Where applicable, energy-efficient Information Technology equipment will be purchased with the most up-to-date energy efficiency functions. When necessary, suppliers or manufacturers will train equipment operators and maintenance personnel in the proper enabling and use of energy efficient and sleep mode functions on their equipment. D.3. All appliances and products purchased by the City and for which the US EPA Energy Star certification is available will meet Energy Star certification. Typically, this would include lighting, heating, exhaust fans, water heaters, computers, exit signs, and appliances such as refrigerators, dishwashers and microwave ovens. Purchased electronic products meeting EPA Energy Star standards are highly encouraged. D.4. When Energy Star labels are not available, use energy efficient products that are in the upper 25% of energy efficiency as designated by the Federal Energy Management Program. D.5. The city will consider rechargeable battery systems for common household sizes: AA, AAA, etc. Disposable batteries will only be purchased in the event that no rechargeable option exists or if there are significant reasons why a rechargeable battery system is suboptimal. E. Water Conservation E.1. The City should purchase water-saving products whenever practicable. This includes, but is not limited to, high-performance fixtures like toilets, waterless urinals, low-flow faucets and aerators, and upgraded irrigation systems. F. Green Cleaning The Green Cleaning concept has been employed by cleaning companies for many years. These techniques have now become mainstream in many cases. The cleaning policy below contains recommendations for the future, but expectations can be made if these are not currently practical or would require significant investment of resources. Some chemicals such as those associated with the rec center pool may be exempted from this policy. It is recommended, however, that we consider lower-toxicity alternatives to chlorine should they become available in the future and economically feasible. City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8b) Page 6 Title: Environmentally Preferred Purchasing Policy F.1. Green Cleaning Roles & Responsibilities The responsible party for this policy is the St. Louis Park Facilities Maintenance Supervisor. It is recommended that he or she evaluate the green cleaning policy on a quarterly basis to evaluate progress towards the implementation goals and assess whether the building (all city facilities except the Rec Center) is being sufficiently cleaned with these procedures. As necessary, the responsible party will revise the green cleaning policy to include additional cleaning strategies or modify existing cleaning strategies. F.2. Cleaning Products and Materials Cleaning products should meet one or more of the following standards: • Green Seal GS-37, Green Seal GS-40 • EPA Design for the Environment Program’s Standard for Safer Cleaning Products. • Hand soaps and hand sanitizers contain no antimicrobial agents except where required by health codes and other regulations (food service and health care requirements) and meet Green Seal GS-41. • Hand sanitizers meet UL 2783 standard for Instant Hand Antiseptics. F.3. Cleaning Contracts & Services Strategies for reducing toxicity in contracted cleaning activities: • Cleaning staff and building occupants are supplied with safe cleaning chemicals that meet the sustainability criteria described in the purchasing guidelines above. • Hard floors, including tile, concrete, and wood surfaces, are cleaned with only sustainable cleaning products. • Microfiber cloth and other sustainable high performance cleaning techniques replacing traditional cleaning activities. • Ionized water-only surface cleaning devices used as much as possible. • Cleaning chemicals must be labeled and stored in locked, demarcated areas. • Material safety data sheets (MSDS) for the cleaning chemicals are displayed in storage areas. Strategies for conserving energy, water, and chemicals used for cleaning: • Manual-powered equipment and cleaning strategies used whenever practicable to reduce the energy and water used by powered equipment and typical cleaning strategies. • Cold water used when possible to reduce energy used to heat hot water. • Vacuum filters and other applicable equipment changed frequently to enable air flow and reduce the energy consumption of the equipment. • When cleaning chemicals are necessary, the operating procedures for chemical dilution are followed to ensure that the minimum amount of cleaning chemical is used. City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8b) Page 7 Title: Environmentally Preferred Purchasing Policy Training plan and tracking plan for water, energy, and toxic chemical usage: • A training plan is developed to ensure all new staff understands this policy. • Every time a toxic chemical is used at most City buildings managed by Facilities Maintenance Division, it should be reported to the St. Louis Park Facilities Maintenance Supervisor with a record of which chemical was used, where it was applied, and the reason for its use (exceptions may be granted by the City Sustainability Coordinator). At the present time, the Rec Center and Park Buildings will be exempt from this requirement. G. Waste Minimization G.1. St. Louis Park requires vendors to eliminate packaging or use the minimum amount necessary for product protection, to the greatest extent practicable. G.2. Packaging that is reusable, recyclable or compostable is preferred, when suitable uses and programs exist. G.3. Vendors are being encouraged to take back and reuse pallets and packaging materials. G.4. Suppliers of electronic equipment, including but not limited to computers, monitors, printers, and copiers, will be asked to take back equipment for reuse or environmentally safe recycling when St. Louis Park discards or replaces such equipment, whenever practicable. H. Landscape Maintenance and Materials H.1. Maintenance Contracts The City of St. Louis Park will ask our vendors and suppliers, in contract terms, to use environmentally preferable equipment, materials and techniques in all forms of landscaping and grounds maintenance when practicable. H.2. Landscape Materials The City of St. Louis Park will strive to make sustainable and environmentally preferable decisions in all forms of landscaping and grounds maintenance whenever practicable. This includes, but is not limited to: • Design for sustainability • Design for low maintenance • Design for walkability / bike-ability • Substitute organics for chemicals • Reduce transport of landscape debris whenever possible • Continue to purchase native / locally grown / organic plants and materials I. Producer Responsibility I.1. The City of St. Louis Park will, whenever practicable, favor products that are manufactured by companies that take financial and/or physical responsibility for collecting, recycling, reusing, or otherwise safely disposing of their products and packaging at the end of their useful life. While this may not be common practice currently, the Sustainability Coordinator could possibly assist with identifying companies that do adhere to these practices. City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8b) Page 8 Title: Environmentally Preferred Purchasing Policy J. Sustainability of Investments J.1. Whenever practicable, the City of St. Louis Park will avoid making investments in which the city and its employees stand to profit from the extraction, sale, transportation or consumption of fossil fuels or other known environmental hazards. The city will seek out a plan to divest current financial assets held in fossil fuels and reinvest these assets in more sustainable investment areas, such as clean energy when practicable. K. Future Focus K.1. This policy is intended to be a living document that will serve the City for years to come even while sustainability standards evolve. Future policy topics may include, but are not limited to: guidelines on fleet vehicles, purchased landscape materials and services, city building retrofits, city infrastructure service and material procurement, and purchased energy. Rec Center and Park Facilities will put in place regular reviews on their use of toxic chemicals and ways to reduce or eliminate their use. Rec Center will put in place regular reviews on the use of green cleaning products. V. DEFINITIONS Environmentally preferable products and services as defined by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) means products and services that have a lesser or reduced effect on human health and the environment when compared to competing products and services that serve the same purpose. This applies to raw material acquisition, as well as product manufacturing, distribution, use, maintenance, and disposal. The following attributes should be considered when determining whether a product or service is environmentally preferable: • Available locally • Bio-based • Carcinogen-free • Chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) free • Compostable • Durable, reusable or refillable • Energy and water efficient • Heavy metal free (i.e. no lead, mercury, cadmium) • Low toxicity • Low volatile organic compound (VOC) content • Made from renewable products • Persistent, Bioaccumulative Toxic (PBT) free • Recycled Content/recyclable • Reduced packaging • Reduced landfill and incineration of materials • Reduce greenhouse gas emissions • Refurbished/refurbishable ASTM – American Society for Testing and Materials. City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8b) Page 9 Title: Environmentally Preferred Purchasing Policy ASTM D6400-04 – the standard specifications for compostable plastic in the US. Available locally – that one or more businesses within the county/city or immediate surrounding areas are able to provide goods and services in a timely manner, and in sufficient quantity and quality to meet a specific department/agency need at a competitive cost. Bio-Based Product – commercial or industrial products (other than food or feed) that utilize plant based contents and residuals but does not include products made from forestry materials. Biodegradable – the ability of a substance, material, or product ingredient to readily decompose by the action of microbes. Being biodegradable does not mean that it is also compostable, however. While a biodegradable item may break down into smaller bits, these components may not be able to provide any nutrients when used as compost. For that reason, ‘compostable’ is preferred. Buyer – anyone authorized to purchase on behalf of this jurisdiction or its subdivisions. Chlorofluorocarbon, (CFC) – the family of compounds of chlorine, fluorine, and carbon. CFC’s contribute to the depletion of the stratospheric ozone layer, and have been used as an ingredient for refrigerants, solvents, and for blowing plastic-foam insulation and packaging. The Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer calls for complete elimination of CFC production. Contractor – any person, group of persons, business, consultant, designing architect, association, partnership, corporation, supplier, vendor or other entity that has a contract with the City of St. Louis Park, serves in a subcontracting capacity with an entity having a contract, or is otherwise hired by the City of St. Louis Park for the provision of goods or services. Dioxins and furans – a group of chemical compounds that are classified as persistent, bio-accumulative, and toxic by the Environmental Protection Agency. Energy Efficient Product – a product that is in the upper 25% of energy efficiency for all similar products, or that is at least 10% more efficient than the minimum level that meets Federal standards. Electronic Product Environmental Assessment Tool (EPEAT) – an easy-to-use, on- line tool helping institutional purchasers select and compare computer desktops, laptops and monitors based on their environmental attributes. Energy Star – the US EPA’s energy efficiency product labeling program: http://www.energystar.gov Information Technology – shall include, but shall not be limited to, the following devices: Laptops, Tablets, Desktops, Smart Phones, Servers, Networking devices, Telecom devices, Televisions, Projectors, Audio and Photocopiers. City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8b) Page 10 Title: Environmentally Preferred Purchasing Policy Green building – the incorporation of environmental, health, and waste prevention criteria in building design, site-planning and preparation, materials acquisition, construction or remodeling, deconstruction, and waste disposal. Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) – a non-profit organization that promotes social, economic and environmental sustainability. It produces one of the world's most prevalent standards for sustainability reporting which can be used by organizations to report and research sustainability practices. Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) – the self-assessing system developed by the U.S. Green Building Council designed for rating new and existing commercial, institutional, and high-rise residential buildings. Credits are earned for satisfying defined criteria and standards. Different levels of green building certification are awarded based on the total credits earned. Light Emitting Diode (LED) – a highly efficient and long lasting form of interior & exterior illumination. Postconsumer Material – a finished material which would normally be disposed of as a solid waste, having reached its intended end-use and completed its life cycle as a consumer item, and does not include manufacturing or converting wastes. Practicable – whenever possible and compatible with state and federal law, without reducing safety, quality, or effectiveness. Pre-consumer Material – material or by-products generated after manufacture of a product is completed but before the product reaches the end-use consumer. Post-consumer recycled material – material that has been discarded for disposal or recovery, having completed its life as a consumer item, and is used as a raw material for new products. Recovered Material – fragments of products or finished products of a manufacturing process, which has converted a resource into a commodity of real economic value, and includes pre-consumer and postconsumer material but does not include excess resources of the manufacturing process. Recyclable – a material or product that can be reprocessed, remanufactured, or reused. Recycled Content – the percentage of recovered material, including pre-consumer and postconsumer materials, in a product. Recycled Content Standard – the minimum level of recovered material and/or postconsumer material necessary for products to qualify as recycled products. Recycled Product – a product that meets the City’s recycled content policy objectives for postconsumer and recovered material. City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8b) Page 11 Title: Environmentally Preferred Purchasing Policy Remanufactured Product – any product diverted from the supply of discarded materials by refurbishing and marketing said product without substantial change to its original form. Reused Product – any product designed to be used many times for the same or other purposes. Source Reduction – the net reduction in generation of waste and toxic constituents. US EPA Comprehensive Procurement Guidelines – the most current policies established by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for federal agency purchases. Water-Saving Products – products in the upper 25% of water conservation for all similar products, or at least 10% more water-conserving than the minimum level that meets the Federal standards. Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 6, 2015 Action Agenda Item: 8c EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development RECOMMENDED ACTION: Planning Commission and City staff recommend: • Motion to Adopt Resolution approving a Final Plat for Central Park West, subject to conditions; and • Motion to Adopt Resolution approving Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) for Central Park West, subject to conditions. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does City Council support the proposed plat and PUD for Central Park West and does it meet the requirements for plat and PUD approvals? SUMMARY: The Final PUD proposes to construct five buildings in phases. The development includes two 6-story multiple-family residential buildings, a 6-story limited service hotel, two 11-story office buildings, a 2,534-stall parking ramp, and a privately maintained gathering space. At full build-out, the development proposes 363 residential units, up to 706,706 square feet of office, and a hotel with up to 150 rooms. Eleven residential units will be affordable to households with incomes at 60% of the area median income. The plans also include reconstruction of Utica Avenue adjacent to the development site. The development includes property in both St. Louis Park and Golden Valley. The Final Plat creates three lots and one outlot. There have been various opportunities for public comment throughout the review process, including a neighborhood meeting, Planning Commission public hearings in both cities on the preliminary plans, a second neighborhood meeting in Golden Valley to respond to traffic concerns along Wayzata Boulevard, Park and Recreation Advisory Commission review of the park and trail dedication fees, and preliminary approvals by both City Councils. In March, the St. Louis Park and Golden Valley Planning Commissions each reviewed and recommended approval of the Final Plat and Final PUD. NEXT STEPS: Golden Valley City Council will review the applications on April 7, 2015. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a well-maintained and diverse housing stock. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: • Discussion • Resolutions • Unofficial Planning Commission Minutes • Title Sheet & Project Metrics • Narrative Summary Sheet • Color Site Plan • Architectural Renderings & Plans • Final Plat • Site Civil Plans (selected sheets) • Utica Avenue Civil Plans (selected sheets) • AUAR Update Summary • Travel Demand Management (TDM) Plan Prepared by: Sean Walther, Senior Planner Reviewed by: Michele Schnitker, Housing Supervisor Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager DISCUSSION PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLANS: The requested Final Planned Unit Development proposes to construct five buildings in phases. The proposed land use would include two 6-story multiple-family residential buildings, a 6-story limited service hotel, two 11-story office buildings, a 2,534-stall parking ramp, and a privately-owned and maintained and publically accessible civic space. At full build-out, the development proposes 363 residential units, up to 706,706 square feet of office, and up to a 150-room hotel. The plans also include reconstruction of Utica Avenue adjacent to the development site. The development includes property in both St. Louis Park and Golden Valley. BACKGROUND: The proposed development site is part of the larger West End Redevelopment area. The West End includes 49 acres of land at the southwest corner of I-394 and Highway 100. Of the 49 acres, six acres are in Golden Valley. The developments within the West End include The Shops at West End shopping center, The Flats at West End apartments, Millennium at West End apartments (currently under construction), the Moneygram and 1600 office towers, and the Olive Garden restaurant, all of which are located west of Utica Avenue between Gamble Drive and Wayzata Boulevard. The proposed development site is located east of Utica Avenue and was originally planned to include four new office towers totaling 1.1 million square feet with a shared 7-level parking ramp having 4,400 parking spaces. This site is mostly vacant land with some surface parking lots. It is 13.48 acres in size, and the eastern 6 acres of the site are in the City of Golden Valley. In 2008, Duke Realty received Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD approvals from St. Louis Park and Golden Valley for the first of the office buildings. The development was called The Towers at West End. However, Duke Realty has not applied for final approvals due to market conditions. The cities have granted several extensions to allow Duke Realty more time to submit the Final Plat and Final PUD. The current applicant, DLC Residential, intends to purchase the land from Duke Realty for the proposed development. The Central Park West preliminary plans have received preliminary approvals from both cities. The Final Plat and Final PUD provides the details required for the two apartment buildings, civic space, and Utica Avenue reconstruction. The future office and hotel phases will require a major amendment of the Final PUD as a condition of approval. The office portion of the property will need to be re-platted into lot and block description. Environmental Review: Five scenarios for development were analyzed in 2006 and 2007 for the environmental review, called an Alternative Urban Area-wide Review (AUAR). The analysis covered a wide variety of environmental impacts as required by state statutes, including traffic generation and transportation improvements, provision of utilities to the site, and impact to any natural systems. The AUAR was adopted in 2007 and updated in 2013. The 2007 AUAR identified several mitigation items. Most of those recommended improvements were implemented as part of the first phase of the West End Redevelopment. There were also certain limits established in the AUAR, which the City continues to monitor as each phase develops, relating to traffic generation, water use, and sanitary sewer uses. City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Page 2 To analyze this most recent application from DLC Residential for Central Park West, the City hired Kimley-Horn to review the AUAR and compare the impacts of the proposed land use changes to the scenario(s) previously studied. The study found: • Traffic generated by the revised scenario is beneath the limits established in the original AUAR with the exception of morning peak (outbound) volumes. No additional mitigation measures or adjustments are needed at this time because the morning peak can be accommodated in the existing capacity of the transportation system, which was designed to accommodate the higher afternoon peak traffic volumes. • Sanitary sewer usage generated by the revised scenario will be accommodated within the limits established in the original AUAR. No additional mitigation is needed. • Water use is anticipated to be under the AUAR thresholds for the revised scenario. However, the City’s preferred 90 percent total system use would be exceeded. Additional mitigation measures or adjustments may be required. A condition of approval is included in the resolution. A memorandum that provides more details about the study findings is attached for your review. Coordination with Golden Valley: Golden Valley and St. Louis Park agree that cooperation or agreements between the cities will be needed in order to address issues that will arise from having buildings and structures that cross the municipal boundary. Staff will continue to work toward an agreement to provide services in an efficient manner. Travel Demand Management: St. Louis Park and Golden Valley have a joint powers agreement that requires developers to “prepare and effectuate traffic management plans which will serve to reduce the traffic congestion.” The Travel Demand Management Ordinance (TDM) in St. Louis Park requires that “the owner shall submit the traffic management plan to the joint task force which shall review and approve all traffic management plans before they may be implemented.” The joint task force is made up of two council members from each city, each city manager and one staff member from each city. A TDM plan was approved for the overall West End Redevelopment and the approved strategies are still valid. DLC Residential updated the TDM Plan to reflect the new site plan. Golden Valley and St. Louis Park staff recommend the changes be accepted without further action by the joint task force. The amended TDM plan is attached for your review and will be included as an official exhibit in the development agreement. Civic Space: A privately owned and privately maintained gathering space that will be accessible to the public is proposed at the terminus of 16th Street and extends almost to Wayzata Boulevard. This “civic space” will include a large green, pedestrian and bicycle pathways, a water feature, play structures, landscaping, lighting, and seating allowing for both active and passive recreation. Public Art: The civic space seems a natural location for public art. The city will lead a process with the developer to identify potential opportunities, and to select an artist and artwork(s). The developer will fund $180,000 toward public art. Sustainable Elements: The plans propose innovative use of the stormwater for irrigation and possible incorporation into a water feature on the site. The developer has provided a list of City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Page 3 strategies that will be incorporated into the development. Each phase must follow the Green Building Policy, and the developer will build the future office buildings to Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) core and shell standards, in accordance with the Redevelopment Agreement for the site. SITE INFORMATION: Site Location Map: Site Area: 13.48 acres (7.53 acres in St. Louis Park) Zoning: O – Office (in St. Louis Park) Comprehensive Plan: Office Current Use: Surface parking and vacant land Proposed Use: Multiple Family Residential, Hotel, Office Surrounding Land Uses: North: Wayzata Boulevard, I-394 East: Lilac Drive (private drive), Highway 100 South: Health Partners office building, Gamble Drive West: Utica Avenue, office towers, Olive Garden restaurant City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Page 4 FINAL PLAT ANALYSIS: Description: The developer requests a final plat for 13.48 acres known as “Central Park West.” The final plat consists of three lots and one outlot. The plat also includes reconstruction of Utica Avenue adjacent to the development. The City approved a final plat in 2008 that laid out the basic framework of road right-of-ways and parcels for the overall West End Redevelopment. Most of the required right-of-way for Utica Avenue, which is adjacent to this development, was dedicated as part of The Shops at West End plat. Uses: The proposed multiple family use is allowed by PUD as part of an office development. The plans include significant future office development, and this site has been planned as part of the overall West End Redevelopment area which includes the two existing office towers across the street. Lot 1 is located northeast of the intersection of 16th Street and Utica Avenue. The lot area is 3.46 acres. This lot is expected to be developed in the first phase with a 199-unit multiple-family residential building with parking under the building and some surface parking stalls. The lot has parallel frontage onto both Utica Avenue and Wayzata Blvd. This lot also includes the privately- owned and maintained but publicly accessible gathering space. Lot 2 is a corner lot abutting both Utica Avenue and Wayzata Boulevard. The lot area is 1.53 acres. Lot 2 would contain a 164-unit multiple-family residential building with parking under the building and some surface parking stalls. Lot 3 is located on the northeast corner of the site along Wayzata Boulevard. The lot area is 1.61 acres. Lot 3 would contain a future hotel with 120 to 150 rooms, underground parking and some surface parking. Outlot A is 6.9 acres proposed for future office development. The preliminary plans show two class “A” office towers totaling 706,000 square feet with a shared parking structure holding approximately 2,500 parking spaces. Outlot A must be re-platted in order to build the future office phases. Surface parking will be allowed to continue in the interim. The three lots in the proposed plat meet all subdivision requirements for minimum lot size, shape, and dimension. Right-of-way Dedication: While the majority of the right-of-way needed for this development has previously been provided, there are areas where proposed public sidewalks fall outside the right-of-way. The plat dedicates additional right-of-way to cover those areas. Easement Dedications: The plat provides 10-foot wide drainage and utility easements adjacent to all public streets. Subdivision variances were approved with the preliminary plat to allow no easements along interior lot lines. A 45-foot wide drainage and utility easement is provided on the south side of Outlot A, where utilities will be relocated to connect to Utica Avenue. A drainage and utility easement is provided over the underground storm water system on Lot 1 (phase I residential). A similar easement is needed for the storm water system proposed on Lot 3 (hotel site). The developer agreed to indicate this easement on the plat before the application goes to the City Council. A similar easement dedication will also be needed when Outlot A is re-platted into lot and block descriptions. City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Page 5 Easement Vacations: A 25-foot wide sewer easement runs along the St. Louis Park side of the municipal boundary. This easement is for existing utilities that are proposed to be relocated to Utica Avenue. DLC Residential applied for an easement vacation, which would be effective upon City acceptance of the relocated utility services. The City Council will consider that application and hold a public hearing prior to action on this item. Building construction cannot proceed until this easement is vacated. There are private utility easements (communication and gas line) that will need to be vacated as part of the development. The developer will work with the utility providers to relocate the services to this site and vacate any unnecessary easements. There are a number of existing temporary construction easements through the site relating to Metropolitan Council Environmental Services’s lift station and sanitary sewer force main construction, which is underway and will be completed in 2015. This improved infrastructure will add 5 million gallons per day capacity to this area. Park & Trail Dedication: Park dedication fees that will be due for the proposed Central Park West subdivision will be $291,552. Trail dedication fees will be $64,575. The City will collect these fees prior to signing the final plat. The Park and Recreation Advisory Commission recommended approval of accepting cash-in-lieu of land at its December 3, 2014 meeting. Tree Preservation: Nearly all the existing trees on the site will be removed. The plan meets the tree replacement requirements. Final Plat Consistency: Planning Commission and staff find the final plat is consistent with the approved preliminary plat with subdivision variances. ZONING ANALYSIS: The property is in the Office zoning district. The proposed development includes several modifications to the Office district regulations. The City can approve these modifications through the PUD process. More site plan and building details are provided for the phase I and II residential buildings. The future hotel and office sites will need to provide additional design details when they move forward. Staff includes a condition of approval that the hotel and office phases be processed as major amendments to the PUD. This application was received and is being processed under the former PUD ordinance and procedures. Future phases will be processed under the new PUD ordinance, and this PUD will likely be converted to the new format at that time. A summary of the PUD compliance with zoning regulations is provided in the table on the following page. Items that need a PUD modification are shown in bold. City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Page 6 Zoning Compliance Table: Factor Required Proposed Met? Use Office (with CUP); Multiple-Family Dwelling (with PUD); and Hotel (with conditions) Office (with CUP/PUD); Multiple-Family Dwelling (with PUD); and Hotel (with conditions) Yes Lot Area 2.0 acres 7.53 acres Yes Height 240 feet; 45 feet for hotels within 100 feet of residential; None with PUD Outlot A office: 176 ft. Outlot A ramp: 71 ft. Lot 1-2 residential: 68 ft. Lot 3 hotel: 66 ft. Yes Building Materials 60% Class I materials 63% or more Class I materials Yes Residential Density 50 units per acre; more with a PUD Lot 1 – 57.5 units/acre Lot 2 – 98.8 units/acre Yes Floor Area Ratio 1.5, None with PUD Lot 1 – 1.21 Lot 2 – 2.39 Lot 3 – 1.21 Outlot A – 2.31 Yes Ground Floor Area Ratio N/A Lot 1 – 0.35 Lot 2 – 0.66 Lot 3 – 0.20 Outlot A – 0.36 Yes Off-Street Parking Lot 1 – 294 spaces Lot 2 – 232 spaces Lot 3 – 203 spaces* Outlot A – 2,227 spaces* Lot 1 – 294 spaces Lot 2 – 236 spaces Lot 3 – 85 spaces on-site, and 118 - 150 spaces off-site Outlot A – 2,634 spaces Yes Bicycle Parking Lot 1 – 229 spaces Lot 2 – 188 spaces Lot 3 – 20 spaces Outlot A – 222 spaces Lot 1 – 229 spaces Lot 2 – 188 spaces Lot 3 – TBD Outlot A – TBD Yes Open Area/DORA 141,180 sq. ft. (12% of gross floor area) 151,977 sq. ft. (12.9% of gross floor area) Yes Landscaping See Landscaping section Yes Setbacks None with PUD Varies; at least 10 feet is provided from public right-of-way lines Yes Mechanical Equipment Full screening required Rooftop equipment is screened Yes Sidewalks Required along all streets and building frontages Provided along all streets and building frontages Yes Refuse handling Full screening required Within buildings, pickup location is not visible from off-site Yes Transit service None required Served by routes 9, 604, 649 Yes Stormwater Management Required Provided underground and includes other best management practices Yes *Includes the 10% parking reduction for transit City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Page 7 Uses: Offices exceeding intensity classification 6 are permitted with a conditional use permit (CUP). The PUD process incorporates and replaces the CUP review process and approvals. The plan will meet all the Office district conditions listed below. 1. The materials used in and placement of all signs shall be integrated with the building design and architecture. A sign plan was not submitted with the application. This is included as a condition of final approval. 2. Landscape berms shall be used to reduce noise, improve views, and to produce other environmental benefits. Berms shall also be used for wildlife refuge, wind and snow breaks, dust reduction and to separate incompatible uses and control drainage. Landscape berms are not proposed, needed, or desired on this site. 3. Buildings shall be designed with proper provision and orientation for the pedestrianway/skyway system to serve and link development. The plan provides pedestrian access through the middle of the site. The future office phases could provide skyway connections between the office building and parking ramp(s), but are not shown in the current plan. 4. Buildings shall be oriented and designed so as not to detract from one another or to unduly restrict views to open space, malls and vistas. The plan was developed in a coordinated fashion to preserve views of the Minneapolis skyline from the new office buildings to the extent possible and the north office building will have views onto the civic space. 5. All new buildings shall be compatible and complementary with existing buildings. Elements of compatibility include, but are not limited to building form and mass, exterior materials and their appearance and durability, landscaping, exterior lighting and site improvements. The buildings will be compatible with the existing office towers west of Utica Avenue. 6. Loading areas, access, parking, signing, and building equipment shall be prohibited or minimized next to residential areas to the extent appropriate in order to ensure compatible development. The site is not adjacent to residential properties outside the PUD, and service areas for the offices will be screened from view of the residential uses. The parking structure is shown in the concept elevations to incorporate elements into the design to soften the views from residential buildings and the civic space. 7. Open space and pedestrian links shall be established to provide access to buildings, parking and transit; provide space for active and passive recreation; ponding, and for preserving wetlands; and a suitable setting for buildings. In phase I the development will provide a civic space in the center of the development that has an area of 0.8 acres. Sidewalks and pathways will be provided surrounding site and through the site. The plan provides for creative active and passive recreation opportunities for people living, working, and visiting the site. Additional details regarding additional outdoor recreation areas serving the office sites will be developed in future phases of office development. 8. The use is in conformance with the comprehensive plan including any provisions of the redevelopment chapter and the plan by neighborhood policies for the neighborhood in which it is located and conditions of approval may be added as a means of satisfying this requirement. The plan is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, The West End PUD concept plan, and the approved Central Park West Preliminary PUD. City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Page 8 A condition of approval requires that the office phases of development be evaluated and approved through the PUD major amendment process. That amendment will follow the City’s new PUD ordinance procedures and likely require conversion of this PUD. Multiple-Family Dwellings are allowed in the Office district by PUD. The plan will meet all the conditions listed below. 1. The housing is part of a larger development permitted within the district. Future offices are proposed as part of the Central Park West Development and it is part of the larger West End Redevelopment Area which includes two large office towers across the street. 2. The building design and placement provide a desirable residential environment. The proposed plan provides buildings that address the sidewalks at street level, limit the exposure to the nearby freeways to the extent possible, provides access to civic green space and private outdoor recreational amenities, and it is located within a pedestrian-friendly urban environment with a number of grocery, retail and entertainment businesses and employment opportunities within walking distance of the residential buildings. 3. Access to off-site parks and open space, plazas and pedestrianways is provided. The development includes a civic gathering space at the center of the development, amenities within the buildings, and a well-connect sidewalk network within and on the edges of the site. 4. The minimum spacing between buildings in a multi-building project is at least equal to the average heights of the buildings except where dwellings share a common wall. The site plan does not meet this requirement in all locations. The PUD allows modifications to any required setback and height requirements. With a PUD modification, the multiple-family dwellings are allowed. 5. The density does not exceed 50 units per acre. The maximum density may be increased at the sole discretion of the city council if two or more of the features below are provided. The proposed residential densities of Lot 1 and Lot 2 are 57.5 units/acre and 98.8 units/acre respectively. The proposal meets all the provisions listed below. a. At least 80 percent of the required parking is provided in underground or aboveground structures, including all levels of parking ramps. This condition is met. b Buildings are placed at or near the street right-of-way and off-street parking is screened from the public right-of-way by buildings. This condition is met. c. At least 35 percent of the building ground coverage contains structures of six or more stories in height, thereby conserving open space within the development site. This condition is met. The residential buildings are six stories tall and Central Park West provides a civic space nearly an acre in size in the center of the development. d. The buildings are located in an area that is appropriate for urban development, and has supportive services and amenities including transit, a high-quality pedestrian environment, restaurants, retail shops, community gathering spaces and entertainment and recreation opportunities. This site is located in an area that provides all the features listed above. City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Page 9 e. The lots are located a minimum of 500 feet from any R-1, R-2 or R-3 zoned property. The site is not located within 500 feet of low density residential zoning districts. f. Traffic analysis shows that the adequate levels of service standards can be met as defined by the City Zoning Administrator. The AUAR completed for the overall West End Redevelopment and the study of the AUAR review of the proposed uses demonstrates that the traffic generated from this development can be accommodated by the transportation system and provide an acceptable level of service. The updated TDM plan complies with the TDM ordinance. 6. The use is in conformance with the comprehensive plan including any provisions of the redevelopment chapter and the plan by neighborhood policies for the neighborhood in which it is located and conditions of approval may be added as a means of satisfying this requirement. The plan is consistent with the environmental studies of this area, the goals of the overall West End Redevelopment Plan, and the approved Central Park West Preliminary PUD. Hotels are permitted with conditions in the Office zoning district. Hotel heights are limited to four stories or 45 feet within 100 feet of any parcel that is zoned and used or subdivided for residential, or has an occupied institutional building, including but not limited to schools, religious institutions and community centers. The hotel is not located within 100 feet of any institutional buildings or any residential properties outside the PUD. However, it is within 100 feet of the two apartment buildings within the PUD. The PUD allows modifications to any required setback and height requirements. Staff finds that with a PUD, the hotel use is allowed. Staff recommends a condition of approval that the hotel phase of development be evaluated and approved through the PUD major amendment process. Architectural Design: The preliminary office and hotel building plans, and the final multiple- family dwelling building plans, all demonstrate a high quality image that will be compatible with the surroundings. The building exteriors include generous use of glass and other quality materials. Glass, stucco and brick are counted as Class I materials on the residential buildings. The minimum Class I material coverage on Phase I is 63%, and the minimum on Phase II is 68%. The residential buildings exceed City Code architectural standards, and the future hotel and office buildings will be required to meet City Code architectural standards as well. Parking: Residential: Parking is provided under the multiple-family residential buildings with some limited surface parking. Both phases meets the required parking counts. Office: The plan provides a surplus of parking for the proposed office towers in a 7-level ramp as well as underground parking under the office buildings. Hotel: The hotel site plan provides 85 spaces on-site. The minimum requirement, after a 10% parking reduction for transit, is 203 spaces. This is a shortage of 118 parking spaces. Off-site parking for the remaining hotel parking will be provided on Outlot A and in the future office ramp. Off-site parking is allowed with a conditional use permit (CUP), and in this case the PUD process incorporates and replaces the CUP process. The future ramps, at the size proposed, will accommodate the hotel’s parking needs, and overnight hotel guest parking will not conflict with the office parking demand. Off-site parking is required to be protected by a permanent easement agreement. City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Page 10 A condition of approval requires the permanent parking agreement be recorded against Outlot A in favor of the hotel property upon recording the Final Plat. Depending on the phasing of development, an interim surface parking lot may be needed on the office site (Outlot A) for the hotel use. A parking agreement has been submitted to the City for administrative review and approval. Access: The plan provides three driveways onto Utica Avenue and two driveways onto Wayzata Boulevard, plus the existing Lilac Drive (private) access. On Utica, a uniquely landscaped entrance is provided between the residential buildings. The plans refer to it as a “woonorf.’ It is designed to be an attractive and pedestrian-friendly space that accommodates slow vehicle traffic. This area would provide access to both of the parking garages and main entrances for the residential buildings. The main driveway to the future office parking ramp is between the two office buildings. Another third entrance/exit is provided on the south side of the office ramp and has connections to both Utica Avenue and Lilac Drive. There is one more entrance to the office parking ramp on the northeast corner of the site. It connects to a surface parking lot and then follows the drive aisle to the hotel parking lot. There are two driveways proposed onto Wayzata Blvd from the hotel site. These two driveways serve the proposed hotel parking lot. The southern driveway also provides a connection, through a drive aisle and additional surface parking, to a secondary entrance to the parking ramp. Loading/Service Areas: The plan proposes to have a shared service court for the hotel and residential buildings. It is screened from view from the streets and central gathering space. Service vehicles would enter at this location to access the shared service area for the hotel and residential buildings (service vehicles would exit through the hotel driveway to Wayzata Boulevard). Auto-turn maps submitted with the application demonstrate that garbage trucks, panel trucks and fire apparatus can maneuver into the court. There is also enough room for two service vehicles to be parked side by side in the truck court. The number and size of loading areas for the office meet City Code requirements. The loading/service areas would be screened from view of public streets by the office buildings, parking ramps, and site landscaping. The loading areas are located between the buildings and the parking ramps. Landscaping: As calculated by the zoning code, 177.5 new trees will be provided on-site. Also over 10,000 square feet of shrub and perennial beds and native prairie plantings are shown. In addition, 77 deciduous trees will be planted in the boulevards and landscaped median of the reconstructed Utica Avenue. The project exceeds the City’s minimum tree replacement calculations by providing 598 caliper inches of trees when 382 caliper inches are required. The landscaping ordinance would require an unrealistic 1,183 trees to be planted based on the development density. The plan provides 90 over-story trees and 155 ornamental trees, and relies upon the alternative landscaping provisions of the zoning code. The plan provides a number of alternative landscaping elements. Most significantly, the 0.8 acre gathering space on Lot 1 provides a large lawn area, paths for people to walk or bike along, child City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Page 11 play structures (climbing boulders), outdoor seating, landscape water feature, and native prairie planting area. This area will also host public artwork funded by the developer per the redevelopment agreement. The phase I and II residential buildings include rooftop patios with a number of amenities including pools, outdoor seating, outdoor fireplace, etc. Also, a private at- grade dog run will be provided east of the phase II residential. Additional landscaping details must be provided for the future hotel and office sites when those phases proceed through a PUD major amendment process. Signage: A sign plan was not submitted for review. Entry monuments of some kind are anticipated on the east and west ends of the central gathering space. Signs will require permits and must comply with the office zoning district standards. Utilities: All small utilities will be placed underground. This includes utilities service structures, such as electrical boxes. There must be close coordination with small utility companies on the placement, screening and burying of these structures to maintain the high aesthetic quality of the streetscape and development. Per the redevelopment agreement, buildings will also provide the necessary infrastructure to take advantage of fiber-optic service lines in the vicinity of the development. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) OBJECTIVES: The Central Park West plan includes certain modifications from the Office zoning district standards. The zoning code requires that applicants for a Planned Unit Development demonstrate how the proposal will “enhance, support, and further the following objectives”: 1. Provide for integrated pedestrian facilities to and within the project: The overall West End Redevelopment extended the existing street grid, incorporating the layout of 16th Street and Utica Avenue and augmenting the grid with additional private roads and pedestrian corridors. Sidewalks are provided along all streets. To further improve pedestrian connections, Central Park West proposes a public pedestrian and bike connection through the site. 2. Enhance linkages to mass transit facilities: At the current time, the development site is served by three Metro Transit routes: the 9, 604 and 649. Route 9 is a “frequently operating transit line” under the existing Zoning Code and Metro Transit may increase the frequency and modify the routes following the construction of the first few phases of development. 3. Incorporate implementation of travel demand management strategies as part of the PUD. The St. Louis Park-Golden Valley joint task force approved a traffic demand management plan for the development in 2008. The purpose of a travel demand management plan is to spread the number of automobile trips throughout the day and encourage alternative modes to the single occupancy vehicle trips, reducing the negative impacts that occur during peak travel times. An updated TDM plan has been submitted that reflects the changes to the site plan and will be included as an Official Exhibit to the PUD. 4. Provide public plazas and designed outdoor recreation area which exceeds minimum chapter requirements: Central Park West provides 12.9% of the gross building area for designed outdoor recreation area (DORA). The majority of the DORA is provided in Outlot A, but the individual Lots will also include DORA. For example, the residential buildings include rooftop pool decks on the second floor, similar to the Flats at West End and Millennium at West End developments. City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Page 12 5. Provide a high degree of aesthetics through overall design and display of public art: The site landscaping and features will include enhanced gathering spaces, streetscape elements, upscale buildings, and will incorporate public art. The specifics of the public art elements will be explored with some level of public involvement and a process led by the City. PUD MODIFICATIONS: The PUD incorporates and replaces the conditional use permits required for the office towers which exceed intensity classification 6. The developer requests the following PUD modifications: Setbacks: Buildings do not have to be set back from the property line in a PUD. All the buildings in The West End Redevelopment are located near the road right-of-way to achieve an urban image. Generally, the Central Park West buildings are at least ten feet from the property lines. In some cases the foundations of the buildings and underground parking will abut side and rear property lines. Also, there are setbacks required between residential buildings and between the hotel and residential buildings in the Office zoning district. A blanket waiver from the Office district building setback requirements is necessary for the development to proceed. Height: Lot 3 – A modification from the Office district height restriction for hotels near residential uses from 45 feet to 66 feet tall. Residential Density: Lot 1 -A modification from 50 dwelling units per acre to 57.5 units per acre. Lot 2 – A modification from 50 dwelling units per acre to 98.8 units per acre. Floor Area Ratio: Lot 2 – A floor area ratio modification from 1.5 to 2.39. Outlot A – A floor area ratio modification from 1.5 to 2.31. The Final PUD plans and above modifications are consistent with the approved Preliminary PUD. NEXT STEPS: The Golden Valley City Council will consider the Final Plat and Final PUD at its meeting on Tuesday, April 7. DLC intends to record the Final Plat promptly and close on the purchase of the property by the end of April. Staff will continue to work with Golden Valley on coordination and potential agreements related to providing services to the buildings and structures that cross the municipal boundary. City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Page 13 City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Page 14 Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development RESOLUTION NO. 15-___ RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT WITH SUBDIVISION VARIANCES FOR PERIMETER DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS CENTRAL PARK WEST P.U.D. NO. 121 BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of St. Louis Park: Findings 1. The owner, Duke Realty L.P., and DLC Residential LLC, subdivider of the land proposed to be platted as CENTRAL PARK WEST P.U.D. NO. 121, have submitted an application (14-23-S) for approval of a preliminary plat of said subdivision with variances from the subdivision ordinance for perimeter drainage and utility easements (Section 26-154a) in the manner required for platting of land under the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code, and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder. 2. The proposed plat has been found to be in all respects consistent with the approved preliminary plat, Comprehensive Plan, and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and the ordinances of the City of St. Louis Park. 3. The proposed plat is situated, in part, upon the following described lands in Hennepin County, Minnesota, to-wit: Outlot A, THE SHOPS AT WEST END, Hennepin County, Minnesota 4. There are special circumstances affecting the property such that the strict application of the provisions of the subdivision ordinance would deprive the applicant/owner of the reasonable use of the land. Such circumstances arise due to relocation of public sanitary sewer mains and urban design objectives for the site. The proposed construction plans include buildings and parking structures that will be constructed up to the interior property lines. 5. Granting the variances will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare or injurious to other property in the territory in which the property is situated. Granting variances to allow no perimeter drainage and utility easements along interior property lines of Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 1 and Outlot A, on the Plat will not impair the ability to accommodate needed utilities to serve the development. The present road right-of-way and proposed drainage and utility easements will accommodate existing and relocated utilities. 6. The variances correct inequities resulting from an extreme physical hardship. The development requires relocation of public sanitary sewer mains and soil correction. 7. The variances are not contrary to the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan calls for such lands to be redeveloped and to include certain elements, such as stormwater management, structured parking, sidewalks, and buildings located close to the street. Such redevelopment on this site could not occur without the requested subdivision variances. Conclusion 1. The proposed plat of Central Park West P.U.D. No. 121 with subdivision variances is hereby approved and accepted by the City as being in accord and conformity with all ordinances, City plans and regulations of the City of St. Louis Park and the laws of the State of Minnesota, subject to the following conditions: City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Page 15 Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development a. City of Golden Valley approval of that portion of the plat within its jurisdiction is required. b. The site shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with the conditions of this resolution, approved Official Exhibits, and City Code. c. Outlot A, Central Park West P.U.D. No. 121 shall be re-platted into lot(s) and block(s) prior to City issuance of building permits for that property, except that surface parking lot structures may be allowed with proper City permits. Building permits for other improvements shall not be issued on Outlot A. d. The on-site underground stormwater management systems shall be a privately- owned and privately maintained. Public drainage and utility easements over said systems shall be provided, and said easements shall connect to a public right-of- way. The public easements are needed for public inspection and emergency access. e. All utility service structures shall be buried. If any utility service structure cannot be buried (i.e. electric transformer), it shall be integrated into the building design and 100% screened from off-site. f. Prior to the City signing and releasing the final plat to the developer for filing with Hennepin County: 1) Park dedication fees totaling $291,552 and trail dedication fees totaling $64,575 shall be paid to the City of St. Louis Park. 2) A financial security in the form of a cash escrow or letter of credit in the amount of $1,000 shall be submitted to the City to insure that a signed Mylar copy of the final plat is provided to the City. 3) A Planning Development Contract shall be executed between the City and Developer that addresses, at a minimum: a) Granting public ingress and egress access and use of the civic space on Lot 1, Block 1, Central Park West P.U.D. No. 121, Hennepin County, Minnesota in a form approved by the City Attorney, which the Developer shall file with Hennepin County when the final plat is recorded. b) A performance guarantee for the installation of all public improvements, placement of iron monuments at property corners, and the private site stormwater management system and landscaping. c) The release of the subject property from the previous development contract and amended and restated planning development contract recorded respectively as Documents No. 4790583 and 4790584 and replacing those agreements with the Planning Development Contract for Central Park West. d) The release of the subject property that certain Reciprocal Easement and Maintenance Agreement for the West End Public Improvements dated July 12, 2010, recorded August 30, 2010, with the Hennepin Country, Minnesota Registrar of Titles as Document No. T4783828 (the “REMA”) and replacing the REMA with similar agreements specific to the public improvements and civic space improvements relating to Central Park West. City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Page 16 Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development e) The applicant shall reimburse City attorney’s fees in drafting and reviewing such documents as required in the final plat approval. The Mayor and City Manager are authorized to execute the Planning Development Contract and any other necessary documents relating to this resolution. g. Prior to starting any land disturbing activities, the following conditions shall be met: 1) Proof of recording the final plat shall be submitted to the City. 2) Assent Form and Official Exhibits must be signed by Central Park West. LLC, the assignee of the applicant and the property owner. 3) Final construction plans for all public improvements shall be signed by a registered engineer and submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval. 4) A preconstruction meeting shall be held with the appropriate development, construction, private utility, and City representatives. 5) All necessary permits must be obtained. 6) A performance guarantee in the form of cash escrow or irrevocable letter of credit shall be provided to the City of St. Louis Park for all public improvements (street, sidewalks, utility, street lights, landscaping, etc.) and the private site underground stormwater management system and landscaping. h. A permanent parking agreement for the future hotel on Lot 3 to use Outlot A and the future office parking ramps for the hotel’s deficit of required parking spaces shall be recorded upon the filing of the final plat and prior to issuance of building permits for any phase of the Central Park West development. Said agreement shall be in a form approved by the City Attorney. 2. The developer or owner shall pay an administrative fee of $750 per violation of any condition of this approval. 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to supply two certified copies of this Resolution to Central Park West, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, the assignee of the above- named subdivider and the property owner, who are the applicants herein. 4. The City Clerk is instructed to record certified copies of this resolution in the Office of the Hennepin County Register of Deeds or Registrar of Titles as the case may be. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council April 6, 2015 City Manager Mayor Attest: City Clerk City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Page 17 Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development RESOLUTION NO. 15-___ RESOLUTION APPROVING A FINAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) AND RESCINDING CERTAIN PREVIOUS RESOLUTIONS APPROVING SPECIAL (CONDITIONAL) USE PERMIT AND PRELIMINARY PLAT CENTRAL PARK WEST 1511 UTICA AVENUE SOUTH WHEREAS, DLC Residential LLC and Duke Realty LP submitted an application for approval of a Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) under Section 36-367 of the zoning code; and WHEREAS, a special (conditional) use permit was granted to allow a daycare facility on the subject property by the City of St. Louis Park by City Council Resolution No. 92-197 dated December 21, 1992, recorded January 7, 1993, as Document No. 2332823, and said use has since ceased; and WHEREAS, a subdivision variance and preliminary plat of The Towers At West End for the subject property was approved by the City of St. Louis Park by City Council Resolution No. 09-045, dated March 3, 2009, recorded, March 18, 2009, as Document No. 4622891, and the final plat of The Towers At West End will not be pursued; and WHEREAS, the subject property is located within the O – Office zoning district; and WHEREAS, two proposed future office buildings that will exceed intensity class 6 under Zoning Code Section 36-115, Table 36-115C and are permitted by conditional use permit. The proposal meets, or is able to meet, all the Office district conditions and said conditional use permit(s) shall be deemed granted upon Final PUD approval of the future office uses; and WHEREAS, the proposed hotel use relies upon off-site parking. Off-site parking is allowed with a conditional use permit. Said conditional use permit for off-site parking shall be deemed granted upon Final PUD approval; and WHEREAS, the proposed multiple-family residential buildings are allowed with a PUD and the proposal meets all the Office district conditions; and WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing on the PUD was mailed to all owners of property within 350 feet of the subject property; and WHEREAS, notice of public hearing on the PUD was published in the St. Louis Park Sailor on November 6, 2014; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held the public hearing at the meeting of November 19, 2014; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Final PUD with all members present voting in the affirmative; and City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Page 18 Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the staff report, Planning Commission minutes and testimony of those appearing at the public hearing or otherwise including comments in the record of decision. BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park: Findings 1. DLC Residential LLC and Duke Realty LP have made application to the City Council for a final Planned Unit Development under Section 36-367 of the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code within the O - Office District located at 1511 Utica Avenue South for the legal description as follows, to-wit: Outlot A, THE SHOPS AT WEST END, Hennepin County, Minnesota 2. The City Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission (Case No. 14-24-PUD) and the effect of the proposed PUD on the health, safety and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area, the effect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan, and compliance with the intent of the Zoning Ordinance. 3. The City Council has determined that the PUD will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community nor with certain contemplated traffic improvements will it cause serious traffic congestion or hazards, nor will it seriously depreciate surrounding property values. The Council has also determined that the proposed PUD is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan and that the requested modifications comply with the requirements of Section 36-367(b)(5). The specific modifications include: a. Reduction in all yard (setback) requirements. b. Increase the height limit from 45 feet to 66 feet for the proposed hotel building on Lot 3, Block 1, of the proposed Central Park West Addition. c. Increase the residential density from 50 dwelling units per acre to 57.5 units per acre on Lot 1, Block 1, of the proposed Central Park West Addition. d. Increase the residential density from 50 dwelling units per acre to 98.8 units per acre on Lot 2, Block 1, of the proposed Central Park West Addition. e. Increase the floor area ratio from 1.5 to 2.39 on Lot 2, Block 1, of the proposed Central Park West Addition. f. Increase the floor area ratio for the future office from 1.5 to 2.31 on Outlot A of the proposed Central Park West Addition. 4. The contents of Planning Case File 14-24-PUD are hereby entered into and made part of the public hearing record and the record of decision for this case. Conclusion The City Council hereby rescinds Resolution No. 92-197 by the City of St. Louis Park granting a special (conditional) use for a daycare facility dated December 21, 1992, recorded January 7, 1993, as Document No. 2332823; and City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Page 19 Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development The City Council hereby rescinds Resolution No. 09-045 granted by the City of St. Louis Park approving a subdivision variance and approving the preliminary plat of The Towers and West End, dated March 3, 2009, recorded, March 18, 2009, as Document No. 4622891; and The City Council hereby approves the Final Planned Unit Development and modifications at the location described based on the findings set forth above and subject to the following conditions: 1. City of Golden Valley approval of that portion of the final planned unit development within its jurisdiction is required. 2. Development of Lot 3, Block 1, Central Park West P.U.D. No. 121 (future hotel site) and Outlot A, Central Park West P.U.D. No. 121 (future office site) shall require a major amendment to the Final PUD. 3. Prior to starting any land disturbing activities, the following conditions shall be met: a. Proof of recording the final plat shall be submitted to the City. b. Assent Form and Official Exhibits must be signed by Central Park West, LLC, the assignee of the applicant and the property owner. c. A preconstruction meeting shall be held with the appropriate development, construction, private utility, and City representatives. d. All necessary permits must be obtained. 4. Prior to issuance of building permits, the following conditions shall be met: a. The owner shall sign the City's Assent Form and the Official Exhibits. b. The City shall collect the remaining 50% of the Traffic Management Fee for that particular building for which the permits are being issued. c. A Planning Development Contract shall be executed between the Developer and City that addresses, at a minimum: 1. The conditions of PUD approval as applicable or appropriate. 2. Public use and ingress/egress across the privately-owned and privately-maintained gathering space on Lot 1 of the development. 3. Maintenance agreement for private maintenance of the streetscaping improvements in the median of Utica Avenue South, public boulevard adjacent to the site, and the civic space improvements. 4. A performance guarantee in the form of cash escrow or irrevocable letter of credit shall be provided to the City of St. Louis Park in the amount of 125% of the costs of all public improvements (street, sidewalks, utility, street lights, landscaping, etc.), placement of iron monuments at the property corners, and the private site stormwater management system and landscaping. 5. PUD plan revisions that may be approved administratively by the City may be set forth in the Planning Development Contract. 6. The developer shall reimburse City attorney’s fees in drafting/reviewing such documents as required in the final PUD approval. 7. Agreement for the Developer to contribute $180,000.00 for public art and to cooperate with the City on a public process to select public art locations, artist(s), and artwork for the site. The Mayor and City Manager are authorized to execute said Planning Development Contract and other necessary documents related to this resolution. d. Final construction plans for all public improvements shall be signed by a registered engineer and submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval. City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Page 20 Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development e. Vacation of any public and private easements conflicting with the work is required. f. Evidence of recording a permanent parking agreement for the future hotel on Lot 3, Central Park West P.U.D. No. 121 to use Outlot A, Central Park West P.U.D. No. 121 and the future office parking ramps for the hotel’s deficit of required parking spaces shall be submitted to the City of St. Louis Park. Said agreement shall be in a form approved by the City Attorney. g. Building material samples and colors must be submitted to the City for review. 5. The developer shall comply with the following conditions during construction: a. All City noise ordinances shall be complied with, including that there be no construction activity between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. Monday through Friday, and between 10 p.m. and 9 a.m. on weekends. b. The site shall be kept free of dust and debris that could blow onto neighborhood properties. c. Public streets shall be maintained free of dirt and shall be cleaned as necessary. d. The City shall be contacted a minimum of 72 hours prior to any work in a public street. e. Work in a public street shall take place only upon the determination by the Director of Engineering (or designee) that appropriate safety measures have been taken to ensure motorist and pedestrian safety. 6. Prior to the issuance of any permanent certificate of occupancy permit the following shall be completed: a. Public improvements and private site landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with the Official Exhibits. 7. All utilities shall be buried underground. 8. The property owner of any parcel in Central Park West PUD shall follow and effectuate the travel demand management plans which will serve to reduce traffic congestion. 9. The Developer shall abide by the City’s water use restrictions and follow state requirements for low-flow structures. After Phases 1 and 2 of the redevelopment, water usage shall be monitored. If capacity is exceeding 90% peak capacity, the City and the Developer shall cooperate to identify city-wide and project-specific measures to first and foremost reduce consumption and if needed to increase capacity. 10. All mechanical equipment shall be fully screened. 11. The materials used in and placement of all signs shall be integrated with the building design and architecture. In addition to any other remedies, the developer or owner shall pay an administrative fee of $750 per violation of any condition of this approval. Pursuant to Section 36-367(e)(6) of the Zoning Ordinance, the City will require execution of a development agreement as a condition of approval of the final PUD. The development agreement shall address those issues which the City Council deems appropriate and necessary. The Mayor and City Manager are authorized to execute the development agreement upon final PUD approval. City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Page 21 Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council April 6, 2015 City Manager Mayor Attest: City Clerk UNOFFICIAL MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA March 4, 2015 – 6:00 p.m. COUNCIL CHAMBERS MEMBERS PRESENT: Claudia Johnston-Madison, Lisa Peilen, Richard Person, Carl Robertson, Joe Tatalovich MEMBERS ABSENT: Lynne Carper, Robert Kramer STAFF PRESENT: Sean Walther, Ryan Kelley, Nancy Sells 1. Call to Order – Roll Call 2. Approval of Minutes: None 3. Public Hearings: None 4. Other Business A. Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development Location: West End – 1511 Utica Ave. S. Applicant: DLC Residential Case Nos.: 14-23-S and 14-24-PUD Sean Walther, Senior Planner, presented the staff report. He explained that the proposed development is part of the larger West End redevelopment area. Five buildings are proposed for construction. Mr. Walther spoke about the findings of the updated Alternative Urban Area-wide Review (AUAR). Mr. Walther discussed the proposed reconstruction of Utica Ave., which would accommodate future traffic generated, especially from the office development. Mr. Walther provided an analysis of the Final Plat and Final PUD. David Graham, ESG Architects, presented highlights of the development. Commissioner Peilen asked about amenities planned for the residential units. Mr. Graham responded that interior finishes will be high end. Commissioner Peilen asked about guest parking. City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Page 22 Mr. Graham said there will be some short-term parking and guest parking which is secured and accessible. Commissioner Tatalovich asked about sustainability features of the buildings. Mr. Graham responded that ESG Architects’ spec is a full green spec. He said he is LEED certified and as a company policy all of their buildings use low VOC paints, finishes and carpeting. There will be extra insulation on the perimeter of the building with the new energy code. They will harvest the stormwater, treat it and use it for irrigation. Mr. Graham said they will definitely hit the checklist to make the development as energy efficient as possible. Commissioner Johnston-Madison stated that she likes the project very much. Commissioner Robertson said the developer continues to bring excellent work to the city. Chair Person asked about the tree requirement and the caliper inch requirement. Mr. Walther said the caliper inch requirement falls within the tree replacement requirement. The developer is required to replace trees removed at a certain formula designated in the ordinance. The number of trees planted will meet that tree replacement. He added that the landscaping requirement varies on the type of development, either based on the number of units in a residential project or the square footage of a particular building or the perimeter of the site. He said the ordinance anticipates that there are alternative landscaping opportunities with denser developments. Commissioner Robertson asked about phasing for the linear park and the developments to the south. Mr. Graham responded that Phase I will be a residential building, the central park and the Utica reconstruction. He said there will be a build-to line on the south edge of the park which will allow the office building to be built and the façade will be back about 20 feet. The barrier will minimally, or not at all, affect the park. Chair Person asked about bus stops. Mr. Walther explained that the area is served by three different bus routes: the 9, 649 and 604. The 9 and the 649 will probably be rerouted down 16th St. to Utica and then up to Wayzata Blvd. in order to better serve residents and employees in the area. He said the 604 is a circulator bus. This area would be the end of the line for the 604 before it turns around. Discussions were held with Metro Transit City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Page 23 about doing a turnaround at 16th St. but that turned out to be impactful to green space and traffic. The 604 will follow Utica to Gamble or Utica to Wayzata Blvd. and make an efficient loop through the area instead of a U-turn at the 16th and Utica intersection. Chair Person asked if there would be any bus layovers. Mr. Walther stated that there is a layover location provided on 16th St. Shops at West End provided two shelters and layover for two buses. Chair Person asked about how the new state energy code would impact the proposed development. Mr. Graham replied that new code for the exterior envelope of the buildings requires insulation on the outside of the sheeting. The thermal break is on the outside that covers metal or wood studs so the cold isn’t conducted through the structural elements. Mr. Graham said code for windows has already been at a higher standard. He added that there are no new requirements for lighting but lamps and fixtures used now are very efficient. Commissioner Robertson made a motion to recommend approval of the Final Plat subject to the conditions recommended by staff. He made a second motion to recommend approval of the Central Park West Final Planned Unit Development and requested modifications subject to the conditions recommended by staff. Commissioner Johnston-Madison made a motion seconding the two motions, and the motions passed on a vote of 5-0. 5. Communications Mr. Walther said the March 18th meeting will probably be cancelled. A meeting will be held on April 1st. 6. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 6:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Nancy Sells Administrative Secretary City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Page 24 UTICA RECONSTRUCTION - PHASE 1CENTRAL PARK - PHASE 1PHASE 1 - RESIDENTIALWOONERFPHASE 2 - RESIDENTIALPHASE 3 - HOTELPHASE 4-5 - OFFICEPARKING STRUCTUREPHASE 4 - OFFICEPHASE 5 - OFFICE*Hatched regionrepresents areasincluded in Final PUD.Areas outside hatch willrequire a majoramendment to the FinalPUD at a later date.NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONPROJECT TEAMPROJECT LOCATIONSHEET INDEXCENTRAL PARK WEST FINAL PUD*Owner/Developer:DLC RESIDENTIAL, LLC21500 Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 402Aventura, FL 33180Ph: 612-325-9767Architect:Elness Swenson Graham Architects Inc.500 Washington Ave. South, Suite 1080Minneapolis, MN 55415Ph: 612-339-5508Fx: 612-339-5382Civil & Landscape: Kimley-Horn and Associates2550 University Ave West, Suite 238NSt. Paul, MN 55114Ph: 651-645-4197Contractor:DLC RESIDENTIAL, LLC21500 Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 402Aventura, FL 33180Ph: 612-325-9767Structural Engineer:Meyer Borgman Johnson510 Marquette Avenue South, Suite 900Minneapolis, MN 55402Ph: 612-338-0713Fx: 612-337-5325Hwy 100 & I-394 - Golden Valley/St. Louis Park - MNVicinitySite LocationSHEETNUMBERSHEET NAMEFINAL PUD 2-2-2015GENERAL INFORMATIONT1.1 TITLE SHEEToFINAL PUDA 0.1 NARRATIVEoA 0.2 CONCEPTUAL RENDERINGS - EXISTING & PROPOSEDoA 0.3 CONCEPTUAL RENDERINGS + PRECEDENT - CENTRAL PARKoA 0.4 CONCEPTUAL RENDERINGS + PRECEDENT - UTICA ENHANCEMENT oA 0.5 CONCEPTUAL RENDERINGS + PRECEDENT - WOONERFoA 0.6 CONCEPTUAL RENDERINGS + PRECEDENT - PARKING RAMPoA 0.7 CONCEPTUAL RENDERINGS + PRECEDENT - LOBBYoA 0.8 CONCEPTUAL RENDERINGS + PRECEDENT - AMENITY TERRACE oA 0.9 PHASE 1 - RESIDENTIAL RENDERINGS + CODE PLANoA 0.10 PHASE 2 - RESIDENTIAL RENDERINGS + CODE PLANoPH1 A1.0 PH1 - LEVEL P1 PLANoPH1 A1.1 PH1 - LEVEL 1 PLANoPH1 A1.2 PH1 - LEVEL 2 PLANoPH1 A1.3 PH1 - LEVEL 3-5 PLANoPH1 A1.4 PH1 - LEVEL 6 PLANoPH1 A3.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSoPH1 A3.2 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSoPH1 A3.3 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSoPH2 A1.0 PH2 - LEVEL P1 PLANoPH2 A1.1 PH2 - LEVEL 1 PLANoPH2 A1.2 PH2 - LEVEL 2 PLANoPH2 A1.3 PH2 LEVEL 3-5 PLANoPH2 A1.4 PH2 - LEVEL 6 PLANoPH2 A3.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSoPH2 A3.2 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSoPH2 A3.3 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSoUNIT MIX & SQUARE FOOTAGES 1/64" = 1'-0"SITE DIAGRAMCity Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit DevelopmentPage 25 NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONPhase 1 - ResidentialPhase 2 - ResidentialFuturePhase 4 - OfficeFuturePhase 5 - OfficeFuturePhase 4-5 - OfficeParking StructureFuturePhase 3 - Hotel(Located behind Phase 2 in this view)City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit DevelopmentPage 26 LILAC DRIVELILAC DRIVESTATE HIGHWAY 100STATE HIGHWAY 100WOONERFWAYZATA BLVDWAYZATA BLVDRESIDENTIALUTICA AVENORTHOFFICELINEARPARKProperty LineGateway to Golden Valley KioskPUBLIC ART/WATER FEATUREPark GatewayMonumentOpen Recreation“Green”DECIDUOUS TREESORNAMENTAL TREESEVERGREEN TREESSHRUB BEDSSOUTHOFFICEPARKING STRUCTURERESIDENTIALHOTELLEGENDEXISTINGEXISTING HEALTH HEALTH PARTNERS PARTNERS ///////////yyyttttttttWEST END DEVELOPMENTSt. Louis Park, MN / Golden Valley, MNFebruary 201525’050’DOG RUNCity Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit DevelopmentPage 27 NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONEXISTING SITEDEVELOPED SITECity Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit DevelopmentPage 28 NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONPRECEDENT IMAGESPARK DESIGN PERSPECTIVESCENTRAL PARKCity Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit DevelopmentPage 29 NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONPRECEDENT IMAGESUTICA STREETSCAPE DESIGN PERSPECTIVESUTICA RECONSTRUCTIONCity Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit DevelopmentPage 30 NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONPRECEDENT IMAGESWOONERF DESIGN PERSPECTIVESWOONERF AUTO-PEDESTRIAN COURTCity Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit DevelopmentPage 31 NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONGOLDEN VALLEY PARKING RAMP PRECEDENTSGREEN WALL PRECEDENT IMAGESLilac DriveBuffer new development from the visual and acoustic blight caused by the massive (+/- 30’ highand +/- 400’ wide) Highway 100 concrete freeway through careful placement of the proposedparking facility and heavily landscaped tree buffer along Lilac Drive, on the east edge south of theGatewayFINAL PARKING STRUCTURE DESIGN WILL BE APPROVED THROUGH A MAJOR AMENDMENT TO THE FINAL PUD AT A FUTURE DATECONCEPTUAL DESIGN PERSPECTIVESPARKING STRUCTURE/ GOLDEN VALLEY PED/BIKE LINKColonnade RampAllianz RampCity Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit DevelopmentPage 32 NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONPRECEDENT IMAGES DESIGN PERSPECTIVESPHASE 1 & 2 - RESIDENTIAL LOBBY SPACESCity Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit DevelopmentPage 33 NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONPRECEDENT IMAGES PHASE 2 AMENITY TERRACE PERSPECTIVEPHASE 1 & 2 - RESIDENTIAL AMENITY TERRACES PHASE 1 AMENITY TERRACE PERSPECTIVECity Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit DevelopmentPage 34 L123456M789101112131415161718NOPQR16' - 0"29' - 0"29' - 6"28' - 0"28' - 0"28' - 0"9' - 6"202 Standard Spaces and 16 Tandem Spaces P116' - 6"30' - 0"30' - 6"29' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"29' - 0"29' - 0"29' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"16' - 0"71,605 SFPARKINGMechWaterRamp UpMUA23' - 0"2PH2 A3.1449' - 0"168' - 0"BUILDING FOOTPRINTAT LEVEL 2-6BUILDING FOOTPRINT ABOVEGolden ValleySt. Louis ParkPhase 2 ResidentialPhase 1 Residential8' - 6"18' - 0"8' - 6"16' - 0"8' - 6"16' - 0"8' - 6"16' - 0"18' - 0"24' - 0"36' - 0"24' - 0"36' - 0"24' - 0"36' - 0"24' - 0"64' - 0"24' - 0"36' - 0"23' - 0"36' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"L27' - 6"10' - 2"6' - 2"e l n e ss sw e n s o n g r a h a m a r ch i t e ct s5 0 0 w a s h i n g t o n a v e n u e s o u t hm i n n e a p o l i s m i n n e s o t a 5 5 4 1 5p . 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 5 0 8f . 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 3 8 2w w w . e s g a r c h . c o mI hereby certify that this do cum ent wasprepared by m e o r under m y direct supervisionand that I am a duly licens ed ar chitectunder the laws o f the State o f Minneso taSignatureTyped or Pr inted NameLicense # DatePRO JECT NUMBERDRAWN BYCHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REV ISIO NSKEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTION2/23/2015 11:51:16 AMPH1 A1.0PH1 A1.0PH1 A1.0PH1 A1.0PH 1 - LEVEL P1 PLA N214521ESGESG02/02/15C entral Park W est Phase 1&2Central Park WestPhase 1&2DLC Reside ntialFIN AL PUDFebruary 2, 2015 1/16" = 1'-0"PH1 A1.01PH1 LEVEL P1No. Desc riptionDateCity Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit DevelopmentPage 35 123456M789101112131415161718NOPQR76 ParkingSpaces32,247 SFPARKING1,132 SFC92B R1,132 SFC92B R1,132 SFC92B R1,132 SFC92B R586 SFAA3Alcove3,732 SFLobbyAmenityTrash1,085 SFC32B R821 SFB41B R994 SFBB31BR+D en730 SFB21B R730 SFB21B RPoolAboveRampDownMechService5PH1 A3.34PH1 A3.3487 SFA1Studio1,375 SFD13B R36Bikes1,244 SFFitne ssAmenity130 BikesLeasing2PH1 A3.11PH1 A3.12PH1 A3.21PH1 A3.2Golden ValleySt. Louis Park35' - 6"9' - 0"37' - 4"37' - 4"37' - 4"37' - 4"44' - 7"33' - 9"40' - 10"30' - 0"30' - 0"20' - 0"56' - 0"65' - 0"148' - 0"L224' - 0"24' - 0"72Bikese l n e ss sw e n s o n g r a h a m a r ch i t e ct s5 0 0 w a s h i n g t o n a v e n u e s o u t hm i n n e a p o l i s m i n n e s o t a 5 5 4 1 5p . 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 5 0 8f . 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 3 8 2w w w . e s g a r c h . c o mI hereby certify that this do cum ent wasprepared by m e o r under m y direct supervisionand that I am a duly licens ed ar chitectunder the laws o f the State o f Minneso taSignatureTyped or Pr inted NameLicense # DatePRO JECT NUMBERDRAWN BYCHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REV ISIO NSKEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTION2/23/2015 11:51:21 AMPH1 A1.1PH1 A1.1PH1 A1.1PH1 A1.1PH 1 - LEVEL 1 PLA N214521ESGESG02/02/15C entral Park W est Phase 1&2Central Park WestPhase 1&2DLC Reside ntialFIN AL PUDFebruary 2, 2015 1/16" = 1'-0"PH1 A1.11PH1 LEVEL 1No. Desc riptionDateCity Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit DevelopmentPage 36 W/DW/D123456M789101112131415161718NOPQRTrash5PH1 A3.34PH1 A3.32PH1 A3.11PH1 A3.12PH1 A3.21PH1 A3.2Golden ValleySt. Louis ParkNOT FORCONSTRUCTION 1/16" = 1'-0"PH1 A1.21PH1 LEVEL 2City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit DevelopmentPage 37 W/DW/D123456M789101112131415161718NOPQR5PH1 A3.34PH1 A3.33PH1 A3.32PH1 A3.31PH1 A3.335' - 6"9' - 0"37' - 4"24' - 6"24' - 6"24' - 0"24' - 6"19' - 4"48' - 4"35' - 6"19' - 4"19' - 4"37' - 4"24' - 0"24' - 0"19' - 4"2PH1 A3.11PH1 A3.12PH1 A3.21PH1 A3.242' - 0"24' - 0"24' - 6"24' - 6"36' - 0"36' - 0"24' - 0"24' - 6"31' - 6"Golden ValleySt. Louis Park35' - 4"8' - 10"24' - 0"35' - 0"34' - 10"32' - 6"32' - 6"32' - 6"32' - 6"65' - 0"65' - 0"180' - 0"267' - 0"138' - 0"25' - 3"18' - 0"35' - 0"35' - 0"23' - 10"247' - 0"137' - 0"TrashNOT FORCONSTRUCTION 1/16" = 1'-0"PH1 A1.31PH1 LEVEL 3 (4-5 SIM)City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit DevelopmentPage 38 W/DW/D123456M789101112131415161718NOPQR5PH1 A3.34PH1 A3.33PH1 A3.32PH1 A3.31PH1 A3.32PH1 A3.11PH1 A3.12PH1 A3.21PH1 A3.2Golden ValleySt. Louis ParkTrashNOT FORCONSTRUCTION 1/16" = 1'-0"PH1 A1.41PH1 LEVEL 6City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit DevelopmentPage 39 SEE COURTYARD SOUTH ELEVATIONGolden Valley11' - 4"11' - 4"11' - 4"11' - 4"11' - 4"16' - 0"11' - 0"6A-11A-18A-15B-19A-110A-111A-11A-17A-11B-11B-11B-16A-1St Louis ParkNOT FORCONSTRUCTION 3/32" = 1'-0"PH1 A3.11PH1 - E2 - SOUTH ELEVATION - East 3/32" = 1'-0"PH1 A3.12PH1 - E2 - SOUTH ELEVATION - WestE1E2E3E4E5E6E7EXTERIOR MATERIAL KEYNOTES - PHASE I1A-1 BRICK - COLOR #11B-1 BRICK BANDING - COLOR #24A-1 BURNISHED BLOCK - COLOR #15A-1 PREFINISHED MICRORIBBED METAL PANEL - DARK BRONZE COLOR5B-1 PREFINISHED RIBBED METAL PANEL - COPPER PENNY COLOR5C-1 PREFINISHED METAL PANEL - OLIVE COLOR6A-1 ABET LAMINATI7A-1 STUCCO COLOR #18A-1 COMPOSITE WINDOWS9A-1 DECORATIVE MECHANICAL GRILLE10A-1 ALUMINUM AND GLASS BALCONY11A-1 PREFINISHED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM W/ FRITTED PATTERNINGGolden ValleySt Louis ParkTOTAL SURFACE AREAPHASE 1Class I Material Coverage*Class II Material CoverageClass III Material CoverageE2 - SOUTH ELEVATION35,807 Sq. Ft.67%33%0%(*Includes 1% coverage by Abet Laminati Paneling)City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit DevelopmentPage 40 Golden Valley11' - 0"16' - 0"11' - 4"11' - 4"11' - 4"11' - 4"11' - 4"5B-19A-18A-15C-15A-15A-16A-11A-111A-11B-11B-11B-11B-14A-16A-11A-1St Louis ParkNOT FORCONSTRUCTION 3/32" = 1'-0"PH1 A3.22PH1 - E4 - NORTH ELEVATION - East 3/32" = 1'-0"PH1 A3.21PH1 - E4 - NORTH ELEVATION - WestE1E2E3E4E5E6E7Golden ValleySt Louis ParkEXTERIOR MATERIAL KEYNOTES - PHASE I1A-1 BRICK - COLOR #11B-1 BRICK BANDING - COLOR #24A-1 BURNISHED BLOCK - COLOR #15A-1 PREFINISHED MICRORIBBED METAL PANEL - DARK BRONZE COLOR5B-1 PREFINISHED RIBBED METAL PANEL - COPPER PENNY COLOR5C-1 PREFINISHED METAL PANEL - OLIVE COLOR6A-1 ABET LAMINATI7A-1 STUCCO COLOR #18A-1 COMPOSITE WINDOWS9A-1 DECORATIVE MECHANICAL GRILLE10A-1 ALUMINUM AND GLASS BALCONY11A-1 PREFINISHED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM W/ FRITTED PATTERNINGTOTAL SURFACE AREAPHASE 1Class I Material Coverage*Class II Material CoverageClass III Material CoverageE4 - NORTH ELEVATION35,987 Sq. Ft.66%34%0%(*Includes 2% coverage by Abet Laminati Paneling)City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit DevelopmentPage 41 11' - 4"11' - 4"11' - 4"11' - 4"11' - 4"16' - 0"11' - 0"5B-16A-18A-19A-15A-15A-111A-11A-16A-14A-11B-11B-111' - 4"11' - 4"11' - 4"11' - 4"11' - 4"16' - 0"11' - 0"5C-19A-15A-15A-17A-18A-15C-15B-110A-14A-11A-14A-14A-1NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 3/32" = 1'-0"PH1 A3.33PH1 - E5 - COURTYARD EAST ELEVATION 3/32" = 1'-0"PH1 A3.32PH1 - E6 - COURTYARD SOUTH ELEVATION 3/32" = 1'-0"PH1 A3.31PH1 - E7 - COURTYARD WEST ELEVATIONE1E2E3E4E5E6E7 3/32" = 1'-0"PH1 A3.35PH1 - E1 - WEST ELEVATION 3/32" = 1'-0"PH1 A3.34PH1 - E3 - EAST ELEVATIONEXTERIOR MATERIAL KEYNOTES - PHASE I1A-1 BRICK - COLOR #11B-1BRICK BANDING - COLOR #24A-1 BURNISHED BLOCK - COLOR #15A-1 PREFINISHED MICRORIBBED METAL PANEL - DARK BRONZE COLOR5B-1 PREFINISHED RIBBED METAL PANEL - COPPER PENNY COLOR5C-1 PREFINISHED METAL PANEL - OLIVE COLOR6A-1 ABET LAMINATI7A-1 STUCCO COLOR #18A-1 COMPOSITE WINDOWS9A-1 DECORATIVE MECHANICAL GRILLE10A-1 ALUMINUM AND GLASS BALCONY11A-1 PREFINISHED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM W/ FRITTED PATTERNINGGolden ValleySt Louis ParkTOTAL SURFACE AREAPHASE 1Class I Material Coverage*Class II Material CoverageClass III Material CoverageE3 - EAST ELEVATION11,199 Sq. Ft.65%35%0%(*Includes 0% coverage by Abet Laminati Paneling)TOTAL SURFACE AREAPHASE 1Class I Material Coverage*Class II Material CoverageClass III Material CoverageE1 - WEST ELEVATION11,701 Sq. Ft.63%37%0%(*Includes 3% coverage by Abet Laminati Paneling)City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit DevelopmentPage 42 ABCDEFGHIJKL123456789SRAMPUP TOLEVEL 1156 SPACESLEVEL P1MECHANICAL/STORAGE18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"6"18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"24' - 0"RAMP24' - 0"1PH2 A3.11PH2 A3.22PH2 A3.28' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"9' - 1"8' - 6"3' - 7"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"2' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"4' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"3' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"3' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"3' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"24' - 0"56,310 SFPARKINGL2118 Bikes272324252333e l n e ss sw e n s o n g r a h a m a r ch i t e ct s5 0 0 w a s h i n g t o n a v e n u e s o u t hm i n n e a p o l i s m i n n e s o t a 5 5 4 1 5p . 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 5 0 8f . 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 3 8 2w w w . e s g a r c h . c o mI hereby certify that this do cum ent wasprepared by m e o r under m y direct supervisionand that I am a duly licens ed ar chitectunder the laws o f the State o f Minneso taSignatureTyped or Pr inted NameLicense # DatePRO JECT NUMBERDRAWN BYCHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REV ISIO NSKEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTION2/23/2015 11:53:59 AMPH2 A1.0PH2 A1.0PH2 A1.0PH2 A1.0PH 2 - LEVEL P1 PLA N214521ESGESG02/02/15C entral Park W est Phase 1&2Central Park WestPhase 1&2DLC Reside ntialFIN AL PUDFebruary 2, 2015 1/16" = 1'-0"PH2 A1.01PH2 LEVEL P1No. Desc riptionDateCity Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit DevelopmentPage 43 UPABCDEFGHIJKL123456789S27' - 8"18' - 4"28' - 0"30' - 0"29' - 0"29' - 0"29' - 0"29' - 0"29' - 0"29' - 0"30' - 0"16' - 6"30' - 0"30' - 6"29' - 0"30' - 0"80 SPACESLEVEL 1RAMPDOWNTOLEVEL P1DOGRUNSERVICERAMP24' - 0"66' - 0"LEASINGTRASH36Bikes1,455 SFD1- 23B R1,052 SFC5- 22B R740 SFB4a-21B R718 SFB3- 21B R1,062 SFC1b-22B R1,062 SFC1a-22B R718 SFB3a-21B R718 SFB3b -21B R740 SFB4- 21B R1PH2 A3.11PH2 A3.22PH2 A3.218' - 0"22' - 0"16' - 0"16' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 2"6"152' - 0"25' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"OUTLINE OFPOOL ABOVEDASHED LINEINDICATES EDGEOF BUILDINGABOVE321' - 0 7/8"152' - 0"299' - 8 9/16"11' - 4"10' - 0 1/32"2PH2 A3.131,626 SFPARKING3,917 SFLobbyL234 Bikes2519161924' - 0"e l n e ss sw e n s o n g r a h a m a r ch i t e ct s5 0 0 w a s h i n g t o n a v e n u e s o u t hm i n n e a p o l i s m i n n e s o t a 5 5 4 1 5p . 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 5 0 8f . 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 3 8 2w w w . e s g a r c h . c o mI hereby certify that this do cum ent wasprepared by m e o r under m y direct supervisionand that I am a duly licens ed ar chitectunder the laws o f the State o f Minneso taSignatureTyped or Pr inted NameLicense # DatePRO JECT NUMBERDRAWN BYCHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REV ISIO NSKEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTION2/23/2015 11:51:25 AMPH2 A1.1PH2 A1.1PH2 A1.1PH2 A1.1PH 2 - LEVEL 1 PLA N214521ESGESG02/02/15C entral Park W est Phase 1&2Central Park WestPhase 1&2DLC Reside ntialFIN AL PUDFebruary 2, 2015 1/16" = 1'-0"PH2 A1.11PH2 LEVEL 1No. Desc riptionDateCity Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit DevelopmentPage 44 DNABCDEFGHIJKL123456789STRASHSTORAGEELEC/DATAPOOL1PH2 A3.11PH2 A3.22PH2 A3.2AMENITY TERRACE16' - 6"30' - 0"30' - 6"29' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"2PH2 A3.1152' - 0"321' - 0 29/32"152' - 0"66' - 0"167' - 0 25/32"66' - 7 25/32"299' - 8 9/16"3PH2 A3.32PH2 A3.31PH2 A3.3NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 1/16" = 1'-0"PH2 A1.21LEVEL 2City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit DevelopmentPage 45 ABCDEFGHIJKL123456789STRASHELEC/DATASTOR.1PH2 A3.11PH2 A3.22PH2 A3.22PH2 A3.129' - 4"7' - 4"29' - 4"66' - 0"152' - 0"8' - 0"16' - 0"3' - 4"8"86' - 0"16' - 0"8' - 0"3' - 4"7' - 4"9' - 6 1/4"39' - 4"97' - 4"33' - 8"7' - 4"5' - 0"321' - 0 29/32"63' - 11"9' - 0"17' - 0"8' - 0"17' - 0"8' - 0"71' - 4"8' - 0"17' - 0"9' - 0"92' - 9 29/32"5' - 0"5' - 0"19' - 4"8' - 0"153' - 5 15/16"152' - 0"8' - 0"15' - 9 15/16"8' - 0"15' - 3 31/32"3' - 4"3' - 4"3' - 4"66' - 7 25/32"66' - 0"29' - 7 15/32"29' - 7 15/32"7' - 4 7/8"91' - 0"91' - 10 23/32"3PH2 A3.32PH2 A3.31PH2 A3.3NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 1/16" = 1'-0"PH2 A1.31LEVEL 3 (4-5 SIM)City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit DevelopmentPage 46 ABCDEFGHIJKL123456789STRASHELEC/DATASTOR.TERRACE1PH2 A3.11PH2 A3.22PH2 A3.22PH2 A3.1321' - 0 29/32"63' - 11"9' - 0"17' - 0"8' - 0"17' - 0"8' - 0"71' - 4"8' - 0"17' - 0"9' - 0"92' - 9 29/32"152' - 0"16' - 0"8' - 0"40' - 4"29' - 4"7' - 8"3' - 4"16' - 8"25' - 8"3' - 4"62' - 0"9' - 0"15' - 0"86' - 0"3PH2 A3.32PH2 A3.31PH2 A3.3NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 1/16" = 1'-0"PH2 A1.41LEVEL 6City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit DevelopmentPage 47 ABCDEFGHIJKL5C-25A-25B-28A-22A-22A-22B-211A-25D-29A-25D-21A-25A-25C-28A-22A-210A-25B-212345675A-210A-211A-22A-22B-211A-21B-210A-25D-25C-25D-212A-22A-2NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 3/32" = 1'-0"PH2 A3.11PH2 - WEST ELEVATION 3/32" = 1'-0"PH2 A3.12PH2 - SOUTH ELEVATIONKEY PLANKEY PLANEXTERIOR MATERIAL KEYNOTES - PHASE II1A-2 BRICK - COLOR #11B-2 BRICK - COLOR #22A-2 STONE COLOR #12B-2 STONE OR CAST STONE BASE5A-2 PREFINISHED METAL PANEL - COLOR #15B-2 PREFINISHED METAL PANEL - COLOR #25C-2 PREFINISHED METAL CORNICE - COLOR #25D-2 PREFINISHED METAL CANOPY - COLOR #35E-2 PREFINISHED METAL SPANDREL/TRANSOM PANEL - COLOR #18A-2 COMPOSITE WINDOWS9A-2 DECORATIVE MECHANICAL GRILLE10A-2 ALUMINUM AND GLASS BALCONY11A-2 PREFINISHED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM12A-2 METAL RAILING SYSTEMCity Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit DevelopmentPage 48 ABCDEFGHIJKL1B-22B-210A-28A-25A-212A-21A-21A-25E-21B-22B-21A-28A-25A-22A-22A-25B-210A-212A-21A-22B-22A-25E-29A-28A-25A-21B-25A-25C-25C-210A-22A-2NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 3/32" = 1'-0"PH2 A3.21PH2 - EAST ELEVATION 3/32" = 1'-0"PH2 A3.22PH2 - NORTH ELEVATIONKEY PLANKEY PLANEXTERIOR MATERIAL KEYNOTES - PHASE II1A-2 BRICK - COLOR #11B-2 BRICK - COLOR #22A-2 STONE COLOR #12B-2 STONE OR CAST STONE BASE5A-2 PREFINISHED METAL PANEL - COLOR #15B-2 PREFINISHED METAL PANEL - COLOR #25C-2 PREFINISHED METAL CORNICE - COLOR #25D-2 PREFINISHED METAL CANOPY - COLOR #35E-2 PREFINISHED METAL SPANDREL/TRANSOM PANEL - COLOR #18A-2 COMPOSITE WINDOWS9A-2 DECORATIVE MECHANICAL GRILLE10A-2 ALUMINUM AND GLASS BALCONY11A-2 PREFINISHED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM12A-2 METAL RAILING SYSTEMCity Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit DevelopmentPage 49 ABCDEFGHIJKL9A-28A-25A-28A-25B-210A-25A-21A-25A-212345675A-28A-212A-21A-21A-25E-25A-28A-29A-25E-212A-28A-2NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 3/32" = 1'-0"PH2 A3.31PH2 - COURTYARD WEST ELEVATION 3/32" = 1'-0"PH2 A3.32PH2 - COURTYARD SOUTH ELEVATION 3/32" = 1'-0"PH2 A3.33PH2 - COURTYARD NORTH ELEVATIONEXTERIOR MATERIAL KEYNOTES - PHASE II1A-2 BRICK - COLOR #11B-2BRICK - COLOR #22A-2 STONE COLOR #12B-2 STONE OR CAST STONE BASE5A-2 PREFINISHED METAL PANEL - COLOR #15B-2 PREFINISHED METAL PANEL - COLOR #25C-2 PREFINISHED METAL CORNICE - COLOR #25D-2 PREFINISHED METAL CANOPY - COLOR #35E-2 PREFINISHED METAL SPANDREL/TRANSOM PANEL - COLOR #18A-2 COMPOSITE WINDOWS9A-2 DECORATIVE MECHANICAL GRILLE10A-2 ALUMINUM AND GLASS BALCONY11A-2 PREFINISHED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM12A-2 METAL RAILING SYSTEMCity Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit DevelopmentPage 50 DRAFT SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS ENGINEERING, PLANNING AND LAND SURVEYING KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That DLC Residential LLC, a Florida limited liability company, owner of the following described property: Outlot A, THE SHOPS AT WEST END. Registered Property Certificate of Title No. 1222619 Lots 2, 3, 4 and 6, Block 4, except that portion of said Lots taken for Belt Line Highway; Lots 7 to 12 inclusive, Block 4, and that part of Raleigh Avenue vacated lying between the Westerly extension of the South line of said Lot 7 and the North line of said Lot 12 and that part of the vacated alley in said Block 4 lying between the Easterly extensions of the North and South lines of said Lot 7 and between the South line of said Lot 9 and the North line of said Lot 11 and that part of the West 1/2 of the vacated alley in said Block 4 lying between the extensions of the North and South lines of said Lot 8 and between the North and South lines of said Lot 12; All in "Kavlis Cedardale". That part of the following described property: That part of vacated Raleigh and Douglas Avenues as shown on the plat of "Kavlis Cedardale" lying between the extensions across said Avenues of the South and West lines of Lot 7, Block 4 and that part of said vacated Douglas Avenue adjoining Lots 6 and 7, Block 4 of said plat lying between the Westerly line of Belt Line Highway and the extension across said Avenue of the West line of said Lot 7, Block 4, "Kavlis Cedardale"; Which lies Northerly of a straight line extending between the Southwest corner of Tract E, Registered Land Survey No. 864, Hennepin County, Minnesota and the Westerly right-of-way of State Trunk Highway 100 passing through a point on the East line of said Tract E distant 18.18 feet North of the Southeast corner of said Tract E as measured along said East line. Registered Property Certificate of Title No. 1012678 Lot 1, Block 4, "Kavlis Cedardale" and that part of the vacated alley in said Block 4, lying East of the center line thereof and between the extensions across it of the North and South lines of said Lot 1. And That part of the North 693.61 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 30, Township 29, Range 24 lying Westerly and Southerly of State Trunk Highway No. 100, also known as the Belt Line Highway. Registered Property Certificate of Title No. 1012734 That part of the South 60 feet of the North 753.61 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 30, Township 29, Range 24, lying West of the Belt Line Highway. Registered Property Certificate of Title No. 1012680 That part of vacated Raleigh Avenue and of vacated Douglas Avenue, all according to the plat of "Kavlis Cedardale" lying Westerly of the Westerly right of way line of State Trunk Highway No. 100 as described in the Final Certificate recorded in Book 412 of Miscellaneous Records, page 148 in the office of the County Recorder and lying Southerly of a line drawn from the Southwest corner of Tract E, Registered Land Survey No. 864 and passing through a point on the East line of said Tract E distant 18.18 feet North of the Southeast corner of said Tract E. Registered Property Certificate of Title No. 1012686 That part of vacated Utica Avenue South, as dedicated on the plat of THE SHOPS AT WEST END, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the northwest corner of Outlot A, said plat; thence on an assumed bearing of South, along the west line of said Outlot A, a distance of 95.16 feet to a corner of said Outlot A and the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence, continuing on a bearing of South, a distance of 81.53 feet to a corner of said Outlot A, and said line there terminating. Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as CENTRAL PARK WEST P.U.D. and does hereby dedicate to the public for public use the public way and drainage and utility easements as created by this plat. In witness whereof said DLC Residential LLC, a Florida limited liability company, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this _______ day of _________________, 20___. SIGNED: DLC RESIDENTIAL LLC By as STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF This instrument was acknowledged before me this _______ day of _________________, 20___, by , as of DLC Residential LLC, a Florida limited liability company, on behalf of the company. Notary Public, County, Minnesota Notary Printed Name My Commission Expires I Marcus F. Hampton do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. Dated this day of , 20 . Marcus F. Hampton, Licensed Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 47481 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _______ day of _________________, 20___, by Marcus F. Hampton, a Licensed Land Surveyor. Notary Public, County, Minnesota Notary Printed Name My Commission Expires CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SAINT LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA This plat of CENTRAL PARK WEST P.U.D. was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, at a regular meeting thereof held this ______ day of _______________, 20___and said plat is in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. City Council, City of Saint Louis Park, Minnesota By: Mayor By Clerk CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY, MINNESOTA This plat of CENTRAL PARK WEST P.U.D. was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota, at a regular meeting thereof held this ______ day of _______________, 20___and said plat is in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. City Council, City of Golden Valley, Minnesota By: Mayor By Clerk RESIDENT AND REAL ESTATE SERVICES, Hennepin County, Minnesota I hereby certify that taxes payable in 20___ and prior years have been paid for land described on this plat, dated this _______ day of _________________, 20___. Mark V. Chapin, County Auditor By Deputy SURVEY DIVISION, Hennepin County, Minnesota Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 383B.565 (1969), this plat has been approved this _______ day of _________________, 20___. Chris F. Mavis, County Surveyor By REGISTRAR OF TITLES, Hennepin County, Minnesota I hereby certify that the within plat of CENTRAL PARK WEST P.U.D. was filed in this office this _______ day of _________________, 20___, at ______ o'clock ____ .M. Martin McCormick, Registrar of Titles By Deputy R.T.. DOC. NO. CENTRAL PARK WEST P.U.D. SAMBATEK, INC. City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Page 51 DRAFT SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS ENGINEERING, PLANNING AND LAND SURVEYING DENOTES 1/2 INCH BY 14 INCH IRON MONUMENT SET AND MARKED BY LICENSE NO. 47481. DENOTES 1/2 INCH IRON MONUMENT FOUND UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN. DENOTES SECTION CORNER MONUMENT THE SOUTH LINE OF OUTLOT A, THE SHOPS AT WEST END, IS ASSUMED TO HAVE A BEARING OF SOUTH 89 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 44 SECONDS WEST. R.T.. DOC. NO. CENTRAL PARK WEST P.U.D. SAMBATEK, INC. 0 SCALE IN FEET 50 100 City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Page 52 6010TITLE SHEETCENTRAL PARK WESTST. LOUIS PARK/GOLDEN VALLEY, MNDLC RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR CENTRAL PARK WEST ST LOUIS PARK/GOLDEN VALLEY, MINNESOTA PREPARED FOR: DLC RESIDENTIAL ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: 1. THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR THIS ISSUE. WHEN PERFORMING GRADING OPERATIONS DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER, PROVIDE ADEQUATE DEWATERING, DRAINAGE AND GROUND WATER MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS. REFER TO MASTER SITE SPECIFICATIONS. 2. ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS. OUTLOT AREA TO BE KEPT FREE OF JOB TRAILERS AND STORAGE AFTER THE CONTRACT MILESTONE DATE FOR THE OUTLOT. GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE CLEAR ACCESS FOR OUTLOT CONTRACTOR TO THE SPECIFIC PARCEL AT ALL TIMES AFTER MILESTONE DATE. PURCHASER OF OUTLOT TO PROVIDE PERMIT DOCUMENTS AND SWPPP REQUIRED BY STATE/LOCAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SPECIFIC OUTLOT. GOPHER STATE CALL ONE NOTE: SEE OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR UTICA AVENUE FOR EROSION CONTROL PLANS City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Page 53 CENTRAL PARK WESTST. LOUIS PARK/GOLDEN VALLEY, MNDLC RESIDENTIAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A B C D E F G H I K DESIGNED OUTDOOR RECREATION AREA (DORA) LEGENDWEST END SITE DATA TABLE OUTLOT A - OFFICE BUILDINGS 6.90 ACRES LOT 1 - PHASE 1 RESIDENTIAL 3.46 ACRES LOT 2 - PHASE 2 RESIDENTIAL 1.53 ACRES LOT 3 - HOTEL 1.61 ACRES TOTAL 13.49 ACRES EX.1DORA AREACALCULATIONEXHIBITPROPOSED DORA AREAS BUILDINGS OUTLOT A - OFFICE BUILDINGS 706,706 SF LOT 1 - PHASE 1 RESIDENTIAL 212,396 SF LOT 2 - PHASE 2 RESIDENTIAL 172,586 SF LOT 3 - HOTEL 84,816 SF TOTAL PROPOSED 1,176,504 SF DORA CALCULATION TOTAL REQUIRED *117,940 SF = 2.71 AC. TOTAL PROVIDED (12.9%)151,977 SF = 3.49 AC. * TOTAL REQUIRED = 141,180 - 23,240 (12% GFA - 20% PUBLIC ART REDUCTION) City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Page 54 CENTRAL PARK WESTST. LOUIS PARK/GOLDEN VALLEY, MNDLC RESIDENTIAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A B C D E F G H I K LEGEND CITY PROPERTY LINE / ROW LOT LINE PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER EXISTING BUILDING LIMITS OF UNDERGROUND PARKING STOP BAR DIRECTIONAL ARROW ROW DEDICATION ROW VACATION 6040OVERALL SITEPLAN1. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTION OF ALL PROPERTY CORNERS. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL MATCH PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER, CONCRETE AND PAVEMENT TO EXISTING IN GRADE AND ALIGNMENT. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT AND CONCRETE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFICATIONS. 4. THE EARTHWORK FOR ALL BUILDING FOUNDATIONS AND SLABS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFICATIONS. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR ACTUAL BUILDING AND SIDEWALK DIMENSIONS, PORCH AND RAMP LOCATIONS. 6. GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS TO COORDINATE WITH APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, ADJUSTMENT OR RELOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS DESIGNATED ON PLANS. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PIPE BOLLARDS FOR PROTECTION OF ALL ABOVE GROUND UTILITIES AND APPURTENANCES IN DRIVE AREAS. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ACTUAL LOCATION OF ALL UTILITY ENTRANCES, TO INCLUDE, SANITARY SEWER LATERALS, DOMESTIC AND FIRE PROTECTION WATER SERVICE, ELECTRICAL, NATURAL GAS AND TELEPHONE SERVICE. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO AVOID CONFLICTS AND ASSURE PROPER DEPTHS ARE ACHIEVED, AS WELL AS COORDINATE WITH ANY UTILITY COMPANIES FOR APPROVED LOCATIONS AND SCHEDULING OF TIE-INS/CONNECTIONS TO THEIR FACILITIES. 9. CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL GOVERNING CODES AND BE CONSTRUCTED TO SAME. 10. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REPAIRING THE DAMAGE DONE TO ANY EXISTING ITEM DURING CONSTRUCTION, SUCH AS, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DRAINAGE, UTILITIES, PAVEMENT, STRIPING, CURB, ETC. REPAIRS SHALL BE EQUAL TO, OR BETTER THAN, EXISTING CONDITIONS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO DOCUMENT ALL EXISTING DAMAGE AND NOTIFY CONSTRUCTION MANAGER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION START. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL TOUCH-UP PAINT ON ALL LIGHT POLE BASES, FIRE HYDRANTS AND CURBS WHICH ARE CURRENTLY PAINTED. COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE BASE BID. 12. CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE OR RELOCATE, WHEN APPLICABLE, ALL EXISTING BUILDINGS, FOUNDATIONS, BASEMENTS, CONNECTING IMPROVEMENTS, DRAIN PIPES, SANITARY SEWER PIPES, POWER POLES, AND GUY WIRES, WATER METERS AND WATER LINES, WELLS, SIDEWALKS, SIGN POLES, UNDERGROUND GAS, SEPTIC TANKS AND ASPHALT, SHOWN AND NOT SHOWN, WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS AND WHERE NEEDED,TO ALLOW FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION AS SHOWN. 13. CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS IN DISPOSING OF DEMOLISHED MATERIALS REMOVED FROM THIS SITE. 14. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 15. CONTRACTOR TO REFER TO LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION PLAN FOR RELOCATIONS AND ADDITIONS. 16. PLANS SUBMITTED FOR PERMITTING SHALL MEET THE CITY'S CODES AND ALL APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES IN EFFECT AT THE TIME. SITE NOTES CENTRAL PARK WEST SITE DATA TABLE LOT TOTAL AREA PERVIOUS AREA IMPERVIOUS AREA OUTLOT A - FUTURE OFFICE 6.90 ACRES 1.20 ACRES 5.70 ACRES LOT 1 - PHASE 1 RESIDENTIAL 3.46 ACRES 0.88 ACRES 2.57 ACRES LOT 2 - PHASE 2 RESIDENTIAL 1.53 ACRES 0.35 ACRES 1.18 ACRES LOT 3 - FUTURE HOTEL 1.61 ACRES 0.39 ACRES 1.22 ACRES TOTAL 13.49 ACRES 2.82 ACRES 10.67 ACRES CENTRAL PARK WEST PARKING DATA TABLE LOT USE SIZE REQUIRED PARKING (PER SLP CODE) REQUIRED PARKING (PER GOLDEN VALLEY CODE) STANDARD PARKING COMPACT PARKING ADA PARKING TOTAL PARKING BICYCLE PARKING OUTLOT A FUTURE OFFICE*706,706 SF 2,474 SPACES (3.5 SPACES/1,000 SF) 2,827 SPACES (4 SPACES/1,000 SF)2,446 SPACES 0 SPACES 48 SPACES 2,494 SPACES (3.53 SPACES/1,000 SF)265 SPACES (10% OF TOTAL PARKING) LOT 1 PHASE 1 RESIDENTIAL 199 UNITS / 294 ROOMS 294 SPACES (1 SPACE/BEDROOM) 299 SPACES (1.5 SPACES/DWELLING)262 SPACES 70 SPACES 7 SPACES 339 SPACES (1.15 SPACES/BEDROOM)230 SPACES (68% OF TOTAL PARKING) LOT 2 PHASE 2 RESIDENTIAL 164 UNITS / 232 ROOMS 232 SPACES (1 SPACE/BEDROOM) 246 SPACES (1.5 SPACES/DWELLING)175 SPACES 50 SPACES 7 SPACES 236 SPACES (1.02 SPACES/BEDROOM)188 SPACES (80% OF TOTAL PARKING) LOT 3 FUTURE HOTEL*150 ROOMS 225 (1.5 SPACES/ROOM)225 SPACES (1.5 SPACES/UNIT)219 SPACES 0 SPACES 6 SPACES 225* SPACES (1.50 SPACES/ROOM)0 SPACES (0% OF TOTAL PARKING) TOTAL 3,225 SPACES 3,597 SPACES 3,102 SPACES 120 SPACES 68 SPACES 3,294 SPACES 683 SPACES (21% OF TOTAL PKG) * TO MEET THE PARKING RATIO FOR THE FUTURE HOTEL, 140 SHARED PARKING SPACES IN ADDITION TO THE APPROVED 3.5/1,000 ARE PROVIDED IN THE RAMP BASED ON A 150-KEY HOTEL. ACTUAL SHARED SPACES IN THE RAMP WILL BE ADJUSTED BASED ON FINAL HOTEL PLANS AND ROOM COUNT. ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: 1. THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR THIS ISSUE. WHEN PERFORMING GRADING OPERATIONS DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER, PROVIDE ADEQUATE DEWATERING, DRAINAGE AND GROUND WATER MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS. REFER TO MASTER SITE SPECIFICATIONS. 2. ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS. OUTLOT AREA TO BE KEPT FREE OF JOB TRAILERS AND STORAGE AFTER THE CONTRACT MILESTONE DATE FOR THE OUTLOT. GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE CLEAR ACCESS FOR OUTLOT CONTRACTOR TO THE SPECIFIC PARCEL AT ALL TIMES AFTER MILESTONE DATE. PURCHASER OF OUTLOT TO PROVIDE PERMIT DOCUMENTS AND SWPPP REQUIRED BY STATE/LOCAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SPECIFIC OUTLOT. GOPHER STATE CALL ONE City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Page 55 W W W W W W W W W WWWWAYZATABOULEVARDSTATEHWY.NO.100 SD-8 SD-9 SD-10 SD-5 2.96%2.46%1 .7 1 %1.84%1.97%1 .4 7% 3.5 2%2.09%1 . 8 6 %2.50%1.14%1.20%14.47% 1.47% 2 .8 6 %2.69%SD-11 19.71% EXISTING H EALTH PARTN ERS L OT 2 -R ES ID EN TI AL P H A SE 2 F FE =8 82 .00 LOT 1 - RESIDEN TIAL PHASE 1 FFE =882.00 LOT 3 -HOTEL FFE =882.00 LINEA R PA R K - PR IVA TELY OWNED PUBLIC OPEN SPACE R EFER TO OFF-SITE PLA NS CIT Y OF S T.LOU IS P AR K CIT Y OF G OLDE N VALLEY OUTL OT A -OFFICE PHASE 2 FFE =888.50 OUTLOT A -OFFICE PHASE 1 FFE =885.50 W OONE RF LEGEND PROPERTY LINE EXISTING CONTOUR EXISTING STORM SEWER PIPE PROPOSED STORM SEWER PIPE PROPOSED CONTOUR CB-1 PROPOSED STORM SEWER STRUCTURE NAME D PROPOSED MANHOLE PROPOSED CURB/AREA INLET FUTURE UNDERGROUND STORMWATER TREATMENT RESERVE AREA X.XX%PROPOSED SLOPE EOF EMERGENCY OVERFLOW ELEVATIONXXXX FFE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION PROPOSED SIPHONIC MANHOLE CITY LIMIT LINE EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER 6050OVERALLGRADING &DRAINAGE PLAN GRADING NOTES 1.ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY AND ST. LOUIS PARK SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. WORK WITHIN WAYZATA BOULEVARD WILL REQUIRE A MNDOT ROW/UTILITY PERMIT. 2.CONTRACTOR TO CALL "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. TWIN CITIES METRO AREA: 651-454-0002 OR TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 3.CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OR EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS. 4.SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TO HELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES. WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT, THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF EXISTING PAVEMENT. 5.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL. 6.CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM SEWER ALIGNMENTS. 7.GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE TO SUBGRADE ELEVATION, LEAVE STREET READY FOR SUBBASE. 8.ALL EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ANY ABANDONED UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 9.REFER TO THE UTILITY PLAN FOR SANITARY SEWER MAIN, WATER MAIN SERVICE LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS AND CASTING / STRUCTURE SCHEDULE. 10. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS AND CURB AND GUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES WITH PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE. 11. INSTALL A MINIMUM OF 4" MNDOT CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE UNDER CURB AND GUTTER. 12. HAUL ROUTE SHALL BE WAYZAYTA BOULEVARD AND GAMBLE DRIVE TO PARK PLACE BOULEVARD TO HIGHWAY 394. 13. UPON COMPLETION OF EXCAVATION AND FILLING, CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL STREETS AND DISTURBED AREAS ON SITE. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RE-VEGETATED WITH CITY APPROVED GROUND COVER. 14. CONTRACTOR IS TO PLACE ALL MANHOLES OUTSIDE OF DRIVING LANES.REVISIONSNo.DATECENTRAL PARK WESTST. LOUIS PARK/GOLDEN VALLEY, MNDLC RESIDENTIAL ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: 1.THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT.CONTRACTOR'S BIDSHALLINCLUDECONSIDERATIONFORTHISISSUE.WHEN PERFORMING GRADING OPERATIONSDURINGPERIODSOFWETWEATHER,PROVIDE ADEQUATE DEWATERING,DRAINAGE AND GROUNDWATERMANAGEMENTTOCONTROLMOISTUREOFSOILS.REFER TO MASTER SITE SPECIFICATIONS. 2.ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK,FINAL UTILITIES,AND FINALGRADING)BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS.OUTLOT AREA TO BE KEPT FREE OF JOB TRAILERS AND STORAGE AFTER THE CONTRACT MILESTONE DATE FOR THE OUTLOT.GENERALCONTRACTORTOPROVIDECLEARACCESSFOROUTLOTCONTRACTORTOTHESPECIFICPARCELATALLTIMESAFTERMILESTONEDATE.PURCHASER OF OUTLOT TO PROVIDE PERMIT DOCUMENTS ANDSWPPPREQUIREDBYSTATE/LOCAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SPECIFIC OUTLOT. GOPHER STATE CALL ONE City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Page 56 W W W WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWCITY OF ST.LOUIS PARK CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY LOT 2 -RESIDENTIAL PHASE 2 FFE=882.00 LOT 1 -RESIDENTIAL PHASE 1 FFE=882.00 UTICA AVENUE SEXISTING MCES SANITARY SEWER LIFT STATION EXISTING ACCESS EASEMENT EXISTING ACCESS EASEMENT 10'DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT 10'DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT 10'DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT 20'WATERMAIN EASEMENT 45'DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT 10'DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT 10'DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT STORMWATER TREATMENT EASEMENT PROPOSED UNDERGROUND DETENTION PROPOSED UNDERGROUND CISTERN LOT 3 -HOTEL FFE=882.00 OUTLOT A - OFF ICE PHASE 2 FFE=888.50 OUTLOT A -OFFICE PHASE 1 FFE=885.50 SEESHEET6061EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT WAYZATABOULEVARDEXISTING FIRE HYDRANT 6060OVERALLUTILITY PLAN LEGEND PROPERTY LINE / ROW CITY LIMIT LINE PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER MH/CB EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING STORM SEWER MH/CB PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER EXISTING SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED 10" WATERMAIN PROPOSED 8" WATERMAIN PROPOSED 3" WATERMAIN PROPOSED 2" WATERMAIN EXISTING WATERMAIN EXISTING GAS MAIN EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER EXISTING BUILDING FUTURE UNDERGROUND STORAGE AREA 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS. TWIN CITIES METRO AREA: 612-454-0002 OR TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 2. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS AND INVERTS, SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN. ANY DISCREPANCY BETWEEN PLANS AND FIELD CONDITIONS SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE PROJECT ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF THE BUILDING PIPE SYSTEM PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION SERVICE CONNECTIONS. 4. ALL STORM SEWER AND APPURTENANCES MUST BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK AND MOST RECENT REVISION OF THE "CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA" (CEAM) STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR UTILITY CONSTRUCTION. 5. WATERMAIN SHALL BE CLASS 52 DIP CONFORMING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI/AWWA CL51/A21.51 AND C104/A21.4. FITTINGS SHALL BE CLASS 250 CONFORMING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI/AWWA C110/A21.10 OR ANSI/AWWA C153/A21.53. HYDRANTS SHALL BE PER CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK / GOLDEN VALLEY REQUIREMENTS. GATE VALVES SHALL BE SINGLE DISC TYPE WITH RESILIENT SEAL MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF AWWA C509. ALL PLUGS, TEES, BENDS AND OTHER THRUST POINTS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKING. ALL WATERMAIN SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A MINIMUM OF 7.5' COVER AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWWA C600 AND CONDUCTIVITY PROVISIONS CONFORMING TO ANSI/AWWA C111/A21.11. BEFORE BEING PLACED IN SERVICE, THE COMPLETED WATERMAIN SHALL BE DISINFECTED AND FLUSHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWWA C651 AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. 6. SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE PVC SDR35 UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. SANITARY MANHOLES SHALL BE 48" DIAMETER PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C478. CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R-1642 WITH TYPE "B" COVER. MANHOLES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF TWO AND MAXIMUM OF FOUR ADJUSTMENT RINGS. 7. ALL PIPE CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITY STRUCTURES SHALL BE "KOR-N-SEAL" OR CITY APPROVED EQUAL. FOR CONCRETE BLOCK OR BRICK STRUCTURES, CONSTRUCT AN OPENING EQUAL TO THE PIPE SIZE, GROUT AROUND PIPE TO CLOSE OPENING, AND REPAIR STRUCTURE TO CITY REQUIREMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE TYPE OF CONNECTION WITH CITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND COORDINATE ANY INSPECTIONS NEEDED FOR CITY ACCEPTANCE. 8. UPON ANY GRADING, SURFACING, OR OTHER WORK, ALL UTILITY CASTINGS (INCLUDING VALVES, MANHOLES, AND DRAINAGE CASTINGS) MUST BE RAISED TO AT-GRADE OR ABOVE-GRADE (AS APPROPRIATE) WITHIN 48 HOURS OF BEING COVERED. THIS INCLUDES ALL CASTINGS, OLD OR NEW. 9. CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING THE APPROPRIATE SEWER, WATER, AND PLUMBING PERMITS FROM THE CITY BUILDING DEPARTMENT. 10. UTILITY TRENCHES SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY (ASTM D698.78 OR AASHTO T-99) FROM THE PIPE ZONE TO WITHIN 3 FEET OF THE GROUND SURFACE AND 100% STANDARD PROCTOR IN THE UPPER THREE FEET. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO WORKING WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL, INSPECT, MAINTAIN AND REMOVE THE NECESSARY SIGNAGE FOR LANE CLOSURES. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES AND SIGNING SHALL CONFORM TO THE MMUTCD, INCLUDING FIELD MANUAL FOR TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL ZONE LAYOUTS, DECEMBER 2001. ONE ELEVEN FOOT MINIMUM WITH LANE IN EACH DIRECTION SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL TIMES. 13. REFER TO UTICA AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL DESIGN DETAIL FOR UTILITIES IN UTICA AVENUE. 14. CONTRACTOR IS TO LOCATE ALL MANHOLES OUTSIDE OF DRIVING LANES. UTILITY NOTES CENTRAL PARK WESTST. LOUIS PARK/GOLDEN VALLEY, MNDLC RESIDENTIAL ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: 1.THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT.CONTRACTOR'S BIDSHALLINCLUDECONSIDERATIONFORTHISISSUE.WHEN PERFORMING GRADING OPERATIONSDURINGPERIODSOFWETWEATHER,PROVIDE ADEQUATE DEWATERING,DRAINAGE AND GROUNDWATERMANAGEMENTTOCONTROLMOISTUREOFSOILS.REFER TO MASTER SITE SPECIFICATIONS. 2.ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK,FINAL UTILITIES,AND FINALGRADING)BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS.OUTLOT AREA TO BE KEPT FREE OFJOBTRAILERSANDSTORAGEAFTERTHECONTRACTMILESTONEDATEFORTHEOUTLOT.GENERALCONTRACTORTOPROVIDECLEARACCESSFOROUTLOTCONTRACTORTOTHESPECIFICPARCELATALLTIMESAFTERMILESTONEDATE.PURCHASER OF OUTLOT TO PROVIDE PERMIT DOCUMENTS AND SWPPP REQUIRED BY STATE/LOCAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SPECIFIC OUTLOT. GOPHER STATE CALL ONE City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Page 57 CENTRAL PARK WESTST. LOUIS PARK/GOLDEN VALLEY, MNDLC RESIDENTIAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A B C D E F G H I K LIGHTING LEGEND CITY BOUNDARY LINE PROPERTY / ROW LINE 6080OVERALL LIGHTINGPLANALERT TO CONTRACTOR: 1. THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR THIS ISSUE. WHEN PERFORMING GRADING OPERATIONS DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER, PROVIDE ADEQUATE DEWATERING, DRAINAGE AND GROUND WATER MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS. REFER TO MASTER SITE SPECIFICATIONS. 2. ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS. OUTLOT AREA TO BE KEPT FREE OF JOB TRAILERS AND STORAGE AFTER THE CONTRACT MILESTONE DATE FOR THE OUTLOT. GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE CLEAR ACCESS FOR OUTLOT CONTRACTOR TO THE SPECIFIC PARCEL AT ALL TIMES AFTER MILESTONE DATE. PURCHASER OF OUTLOT TO PROVIDE PERMIT DOCUMENTS AND SWPPP REQUIRED BY STATE/LOCAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SPECIFIC OUTLOT. GOPHER STATE CALL ONE 38 City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Page 58 CENTRAL PARK WESTST. LOUIS PARK/GOLDEN VALLEY, MNDLC RESIDENTIAL GOPHER STATE CALL ONE ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: 1. THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR THIS ISSUE. WHEN PERFORMING GRADING OPERATIONS DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER, PROVIDE ADEQUATE DEWATERING, DRAINAGE AND GROUND WATER MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS. REFER TO MASTER SITE SPECIFICATIONS. 2. ALL WM GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS. OUTLOT AREA TO BE KEPT FREE OF JOB TRAILERS AND STORAGE AFTER THE CONTRACT MILESTONE DATE FOR THE OUTLOT. WM GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE CLEAR ACCESS FOR OUTLOT CONTRACTOR TO THE SPECIFIC PARCEL AT ALL TIMES AFTER MILESTONE DATE. PURCHASER OF OUTLOT TO PROVIDE PERMIT DOCUMENTS AND SWPPP REQUIRED BY STATE/LOCAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SPECIFIC OUTLOT.NORTHOVERALLLANDSCAPEPLAN6100 NOTES 1. VERIFY ALL LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS WITH REMOVALS AND SITEWORK. 2. ALL DISTURBED LANDSCAPED AREAS, NOT INDICATED AS PLANTING BEDS, ARE TO BE SODDED. SOD IS TO BE PRIMARILY KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS, FREE OF LAWN GRASS AND WEEDS, REPLACE DAMAGED LAWN GRASS WITH SOD AS DIRECTED BY ON-SITE REPRESENTATIVE. MATCH ALL PROPOSED LANDSCAPED AREAS INTO EXISTING. 3. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY PLANTS REQUIRED AS REFLECTED ON PLAN. 4. ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL HAVE TOPSOIL PLACED AT MINIMUM DEPTH OF 4" FOR SOD AREAS, 12" FOR SHRUB/PERENNIAL/ANNUAL BEDS, AND 24" FOR TREE AREAS. 5. ALL PLANTING BEDS TO BE EDGED WITH STEEL EDGER, ANCHORED 4'-0" O.C. WITH METAL SPIKES, COLOR BLACK. 6. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 4" IN DEPTH, FREE OF ALL DELETERIOUS MATERIAL AND LOCATED IN ALL LANDSCAPE BEDS. 7. EXISTING TREES AND SHRUBS TO REMAIN THROUGHOUT THE PROPERTY SHALL BE PRUNED TO REMOVE DEAD OR UNDESIRABLE LIMBS AND TO SHAPE PLANT FOR DESIRABLE APPEARANCE PROTECT EXISTING TREES. 8. CONTRACTOR TO DISPOSE OF ALL REMOVALS OFF-SITE. SEE EXISTING CONDITIONS & REMOVALS PLAN FOR MORE INFORMATION. 9. CONTRACTOR TO WARRANTY NEW SOD FOR 60 DAYS AND NEW PLANTINGS FOR ONE YEAR UPON PROJECT COMPLETION. 10. IRRIGATE WITH AUTOMATIC UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION SYSTEM AT ALL PLANTED AREAS. SYSTEM SHALL BE COMPLETE. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS FOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS APPROVAL. 11. REFER TO "THREE STEPS FOR PLANTING TREES AND SHRUBS" PUBLICATION BY THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF FOREST RESOURCES DATED DECEMBER 10, 2013 FOR PROPER PLANTING METHODS. City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Page 59 CENTRAL PARK WESTST. LOUIS PARK/GOLDEN VALLEY, MNDLC RESIDENTIAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A B C D E F G H I K 6106WOONERF PLAN ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: 1. THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR THIS ISSUE. WHEN PERFORMING GRADING OPERATIONS DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER, PROVIDE ADEQUATE DEWATERING, DRAINAGE AND GROUND WATER MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS. REFER TO MASTER SITE SPECIFICATIONS. 2. ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS. OUTLOT AREA TO BE KEPT FREE OF JOB TRAILERS AND STORAGE AFTER THE CONTRACT MILESTONE DATE FOR THE OUTLOT. GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE CLEAR ACCESS FOR OUTLOT CONTRACTOR TO THE SPECIFIC PARCEL AT ALL TIMES AFTER MILESTONE DATE. PURCHASER OF OUTLOT TO PROVIDE PERMIT DOCUMENTS AND SWPPP REQUIRED BY STATE/LOCAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SPECIFIC OUTLOT. GOPHER STATE CALL ONE City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Page 60 6310TITLE SHEETREVISIONSNo.DATECONSTRUCTION PLANS FORCENTRAL PARK WEST - UTICA AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS ST. LOUIS PARK / GOLDEN VALLEY, MINNESOTA PREPARED FOR: DLC RESIDENTIAL ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: 1. THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR THIS ISSUE. WHEN PERFORMING GRADING OPERATIONS DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER, PROVIDE ADEQUATE DEWATERING, DRAINAGE AND GROUND WATER MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS. REFER TO MASTER SITE SPECIFICATIONS. 2. ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS. GOPHER STATE CALL ONE ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: 1. CONTRACTOR IS TO COORDINATE UTICA AVENUE PLANS WITH CENTRAL PARK WEST PLANS. UTICA AVENUE AND CENTRAL PARK WEST TO BE CONSTRUCTED UNDER ONE NPDES PERMIT. City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Page 61 REVISIONSNo.DATE1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A B C D E F G H I K 6340STREET PROFILE& PAVEMENTLAYOUT PLAN NOTES UTICA AVENUE ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: 1. THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR THIS ISSUE. WHEN PERFORMING GRADING OPERATIONS DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER, PROVIDE ADEQUATE DEWATERING, DRAINAGE AND GROUND WATER MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS. REFER TO MASTER SITE SPECIFICATIONS. 2. ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS. GOPHER STATE CALL ONE City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Page 62 REVISIONSNo.DATE1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A B C D E F G H I K 6341STREET PROFILE& PAVEMENTLAYOUT PLAN UTICA AVENUEW 16TH STREET NOTESALERT TO CONTRACTOR: 1. THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR THIS ISSUE. WHEN PERFORMING GRADING OPERATIONS DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER, PROVIDE ADEQUATE DEWATERING, DRAINAGE AND GROUND WATER MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS. REFER TO MASTER SITE SPECIFICATIONS. 2. ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS. GOPHER STATE CALL ONE City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Page 63 REVISIONSNo.DATE1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A B C D E F G H I K 6342STREET PROFILE& PAVEMENTLAYOUT PLAN UTICA AVENUE WAYZATA BOULEVARD NOTES ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: 1. THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR THIS ISSUE. WHEN PERFORMING GRADING OPERATIONS DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER, PROVIDE ADEQUATE DEWATERING, DRAINAGE AND GROUND WATER MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS. REFER TO MASTER SITE SPECIFICATIONS. 2. ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS GOPHER STATE CALL ONE City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Page 64 6343TYPICALSECTIONS REVISIONSNo.DATECity Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Page 65 6350STORM SEWERPLAN & PROFILE LEGEND PROPERTY LINE / ROW CITY LIMIT LINE PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER MH/CB EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING STORM CATCH BASIN / MANHOLE REVISIONSNo.DATEUTICA AVENUEW 16TH STREETWAYZATA BOULEVARD ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: 1. THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR THIS ISSUE. WHEN PERFORMING GRADING OPERATIONS DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER, PROVIDE ADEQUATE DEWATERING, DRAINAGE AND GROUND WATER MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS. REFER TO MASTER SITE SPECIFICATIONS. 2. ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS. GOPHER STATE CALL ONE City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Page 66 SEE CENTRAL PARK WEST PLANS ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: ALL MANHOLES ARE TO BE LOCATED OUTSIDE OF VEHICLE DRIVING LANES ON UTICA SEE CENTRAL PARK WEST PLANS 6360UTILITY PLAN &PROFILELEGEND REVISIONSNo.DATEALERT TO CONTRACTOR: 1. THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR THIS ISSUE. WHEN PERFORMING GRADING OPERATIONS DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER, PROVIDE ADEQUATE DEWATERING, DRAINAGE AND GROUND WATER MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS. REFER TO MASTER SITE SPECIFICATIONS. 2. ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS. GOPHER STATE CALL ONE City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Page 67 ALERTTOCONTRACTOR:ALLMANHOLESARETOBELOCATEDOUTSIDEOFVEHICLEDRIVINGLANESONUTICA6361UTILITY PLAN &PROFILELEGEND REVISIONSNo.DATEALERT TO CONTRACTOR: 1. THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR THIS ISSUE. WHEN PERFORMING GRADING OPERATIONS DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER, PROVIDE ADEQUATE DEWATERING, DRAINAGE AND GROUND WATER MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS. REFER TO MASTER SITE SPECIFICATIONS. 2. ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS. GOPHER STATE CALL ONE City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Page 68 REVISIONSNo.DATE1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A B C D E F G H I K 6370SIGNAGE &STRIPING PLAN NOTES UTICA AVENUE LEGEND GOPHER STATE CALL ONE ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: 1. THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR THIS ISSUE. WHEN PERFORMING GRADING OPERATIONS DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER, PROVIDE ADEQUATE DEWATERING, DRAINAGE AND GROUND WATER MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS. REFER TO MASTER SITE SPECIFICATIONS. 2. ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS. City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Page 69 REVISIONSNo.DATE1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A B C D E F G H I K 6371SIGNAGE &STRIPING PLANALL WAY NOTES UTICA AVENUEW 16TH STREET LEGEND ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: 1. THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR THIS ISSUE. WHEN PERFORMING GRADING OPERATIONS DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER, PROVIDE ADEQUATE DEWATERING, DRAINAGE AND GROUND WATER MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS. REFER TO MASTER SITE SPECIFICATIONS. 2. ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS. GOPHER STATE CALL ONE City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Page 70 REVISIONSNo.DATE1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A B C D E F G H I K 6372SIGNAGE &STRIPING PLAN NOTES LEGEND UTICA AVENUE WAYZATA BOULEVARD GOPHER STATE CALL ONE ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: 1. THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR THIS ISSUE. WHEN PERFORMING GRADING OPERATIONS DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER, PROVIDE ADEQUATE DEWATERING, DRAINAGE AND GROUND WATER MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS. REFER TO MASTER SITE SPECIFICATIONS. 2. ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS. City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Page 71 LOT 2 -RES IDENTIAL PHA SE 2 6 STORIES -164 UNITS UTICA AVENUE WAYZAYTABOULEVARD0.40.40.30.60.60.90.80.30.70.92.31.10.40.82.02.51.10.40.82.11.71.00.40.81.70.60.60.40.80.90.40.40.30.91.20.50.50.30.92.20.90.90.50.82.22.31.40.60.50.81.42.01.40.60.50.50.51.81.20.60.40.40.40.80.70.60.50.40.40.90.90.60.50.60.82.21.40.60.50.81.91.91.40.60.40.82.12.01.30.50.81.70.70.70.40.60.70.40.40.30.40.40.40.30.30.30.30.60.60.30.50.61.61.10.40.81.52.11.30.50.40.82.22.31.30.50.50.82.00.90.90.80.50.40.70.90.40.40.40.40.40.40.40.30.40.30.40.40.30.30.50.50.40.40.50.51.41.10.50.30.81.22.01.40.50.92.32.41.40.40.82.21.10.90.40.71.20.40.40.30.40.40.20.20.20.30.30.20.20.20.20.20.30.30.20.30.30.70.60.30.50.62.01.30.40.81.71.91.40.50.82.22.11.30.40.81.90.70.70.40.60.70.30.30.20.30.30.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.30.30.20.30.30.80.70.70.30.60.72.01.10.40.71.92.21.20.40.72.11.81.10.40.71.60.60.50.30.50.60.20.20.20.20.30.20.20.20.20.30.40.50.50.40.20.61.40.80.30.61.61.00.40.51.22.02.41.20.50.40.70.80.70.40.30.30.30.30.30.30.30.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.30.30.30.30.30.40.50.50.40.20.30.71.31.30.70.30.72.02.31.00.40.61.71.20.40.51.01.00.80.50.40.50.50.40.30.40.50.60.30.30.40.81.30.40.30.40.92.20.70.40.30.82.01.30.50.30.61.01.80.60.20.40.41.50.70.20.30.30.60.50.20.30.30.30.30.40.60.60.20.20.51.31.60.20.20.61.62.50.30.30.30.61.50.70.50.30.81.31.60.80.31.01.92.20.90.30.30.92.32.00.90.30.82.00.80.60.30.70.90.40.30.30.40.40.30.30.30.40.40.40.30.50.60.80.60.30.81.62.00.90.30.82.12.31.00.40.30.81.81.81.00.50.40.60.90.70.60.50.40.40.50.50.50.50.40.40.50.80.50.40.60.80.81.30.60.40.61.62.22.41.40.60.50.61.61.91.30.50.30.61.30.80.70.60.80.50.50.30.60.60.80.70.40.91.32.01.00.31.02.42.21.00.31.02.21.91.00.30.81.20.70.60.20.40.50.30.30.20.30.30.30.30.20.30.30.40.40.20.40.51.00.80.30.81.12.21.10.41.12.32.01.10.41.02.31.61.00.30.91.40.60.50.30.60.70.30.30.30.30.60.6AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AA AAAA AA AA AA EXISTING LIGHTING Luminaire Schedule Symbol Qty Label Arrangement Total Lamp Lumens LLF Description 33 AA SINGLE 4777 0.810 Cyclone #CY11T4-VS3AR-5L-67W-4K on Hapco #Y7C-14F6-SFO-BA-GFI pole Calculation Summary Label CalcType Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min Center Crossing_Top Illuminance Fc 0.55 2.6 0.1 5.50 26.00 Roadway Section 2_Planar Illuminance Fc 0.78 2.5 0.2 3.90 12.50 Roadway Segment 1_Planar Illuminance Fc 0.74 2.5 0.2 3.70 12.50 REVISIONSNo.DATE6380PHOTOMETRICPLANLEGEND: ROW / PROPERTY LINE GOPHER STATE CALL ONE 1. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE CONNECTION AND LAYOUT OF LIGHTING AND DECORATIVE LIGHTING OUTLET CONDUITS WITH LIGHTING CONTRACTOR. 2. EACH TREE WITHIN THE MEDIAN SHALL HAVE AN ADJACENT POWER PEDESTAL INSTALLED APPROXIMATELY 30" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. PAD-LOCKABLE WEATHERPROOF OUTLET BOX WITH IN-USE COVER SHALL BE PROVIDED. RECEPTACLE ENCLOSURE SHALL BE RAISED AND A JUNCTION BOX PROVIDED BELOW IF NEEDED AND AS REQUIRED FOR REQUIRED WIRING SPACE. NOTES: ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: 1. THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR THIS ISSUE. WHEN PERFORMING GRADING OPERATIONS DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER, PROVIDE ADEQUATE DEWATERING, DRAINAGE AND GROUND WATER MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS. REFER TO MASTER SITE SPECIFICATIONS. 2. ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS. City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Page 72 LOT 2 -RES IDENTIAL PHA SE 2 6 STORIES -164 UNITS UTICA AVENUE WAYZAYTABOULEVARDLIMITS OF IRRIGATION W16THSTREETREVISIONSNo.DATE6400LANDSCAPEPLANLEGEND: ROW / PROPERTY LINE LIMITS OF IRRIGATION EXISTING TREES 1.ALL BRANCHES LOWER THAN 8' ON PROPOSED TREES SHALL BE PRUNED 2.ALL MEDIAN PLANTINGS SHALL BE A MAXIMUM 2' HEIGHT 3.VERIFY ALL LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS WITH REMOVALS AND SITEWORK. 4.ALL DISTURBED LANDSCAPED AREAS, NOT INDICATED AS PLANTING BEDS, ARE TO BE SODDED. SOD IS TO BE PRIMARILY KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS, FREE OF LAWN GRASS AND WEEDS. REPLACE DAMAGED LAWN GRASS WITH SOD AS DIRECTED BY ON-SITE REPRESENTATIVE. MATCH ALL PROPOSED LANDSCAPED AREAS INTO EXISTING. 5.CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY PLANTS REQUIRED AS REFLECTED ON PLAN. 6.ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL HAVE TOPSOIL PLACED AT MINIMUM DEPTH OF 4" FOR SOD AREAS, 12" FOR SHRUB/PERENNIAL/ANNUAL BEDS, AND 24" FOR TREE AREAS. 7.SINGLE TREE AND SHRUB PLANTINGS SHALL HAVE A 4" DEPTH SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH RING AROUND EACH BASE. TREES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 3' DIAMETER RING. 8.SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 4" IN DEPTH, FREE OF ALL DELETERIOUS MATERIAL AND LOCATED IN ALL LANDSCAPE BEDS. 9.EXISTING TREES AND SHRUBS TO REMAIN, THROUGHOUT THE PROPERTY, SHALL BE PRUNED TO REMOVE DEAD OR UNDESIRABLE LIMBS AND TO SHAPE PLANT FOR DESIRABLE APPEARANCE. PROTECT EXISTING TREES. 10. CONTRACTOR TO DISPOSE OF ALL REMOVALS OFF-SITE. SEE EXISTING CONDITIONS & REMOVALS PLAN FOR MORE INFORMATION. 11. CONTRACTOR TO WATER PLANT MATERIAL DURING INSTALLATION AND FOR A 60 DAY ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD. VOLUME OF WATER TO BE PER PLANT REQUIREMENT FOR ESTABLISHMENT AND NORMAL GROWTH. 12. CONTRACTOR TO WARRANTY NEW SOD FOR 60 DAYS AND NEW PLANTINGS FOR ONE YEAR UPON PROJECT COMPLETION. 13. IRRIGATE WITH AUTOMATIC UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION SYSTEM AT ALL PLANTED AREAS WITHIN LIMITS AS SHOWN. SYSTEM SHALL BE COMPLETE. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS FOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS APPROVAL. 14. DECORATIVE LIGHTING SHALL HAVE OUTLETS APPROXIMATELY 30" ABOVE THE GROUND. 15. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE CONNECTION AND LAYOUT OF LIGHTING AND DECORATIVE LIGHTING OUTLET. 16. DECORATIVE LIGHTING FOR TREES WITHIN MEDIAN SHALL HAVE OUTLETS INSTALLED APPROXIMATELY 30" ABOVE THE GROUND. GOPHER STATE CALL ONE ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: 1. THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR THIS ISSUE. WHEN PERFORMING GRADING OPERATIONS DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER, PROVIDE ADEQUATE DEWATERING, DRAINAGE AND GROUND WATER MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS. REFER TO MASTER SITE SPECIFICATIONS. 2. ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS. City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Page 73 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A B C D E F G H I K 6901LINEAR PARKSITE & PAVINGPLANALERT TO CONTRACTOR: 1. THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR THIS ISSUE. WHEN PERFORMING GRADING OPERATIONS DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER, PROVIDE ADEQUATE DEWATERING, DRAINAGE AND GROUND WATER MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS. REFER TO MASTER SITE SPECIFICATIONS. 2. ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS. GOPHER STATE CALL ONE REVISIONSNo.DATECity Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Page 74 LEGEND PROPERTY LINE EXISTING CONTOUR EXISTING STORM SEWER PIPE PROPOSED STORM SEWER PIPE PROPOSED CONTOUR CB-1 PROPOSED STORM SEWER STRUCTURE LABEL D PROPOSED MANHOLE PROPOSED CURB/AREA INLET PROPOSED SPOT GRADE X.XX%PROPOSED SLOPE EOF EMERGENCY OVERFLOW ELEVATIONXXXX FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION TOP OF CURB CURB FLOW LINE PROPOSED SIPHONIC MANHOLE CITY LIMIT LINE EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER PROPOSED GRADING RIDGELINE / SWALE HIGH POINT LOW POINT DRAINAGE SCHEDULE STRUCTURE NO. SD-1 SD-1A SD-2 SD-2A SD-3 SD-4 SD-6 SD-7 SD-12 SD-18 STRUCTURE/ CASTING TYPE OCS MH MH MH MH MH MH CB MH MH RIM/GRATE ELEVATION 882.20 882.18 881.78 881.85 881.64 882.03 881.45 880.50 882.94 882.02 INVERT ELEVATION IN S 872.00 E 873.33 NE 872.94 E 871.23 N 868.00 W 873.00 E 873.00 N 873.59 E 872.23 W 876.64 NE 871.14 PIPE SIZE IN 21" 18" 24" 18" 24" 18" 18" 18" 18" 24" 24" PIPE SLOPE IN 1.99% 1.00% 0.50% 0.50% 1.50% 0.50% 0.89% 0.50% 0.50% 1.51% 0.50% INVERT ELEVATION OUT W 872.00 W 873.57 SW 871.23 S 868.22 SW 873.00 E 873.59 W 876.00 W 872.23 PIPE SIZE OUT 21" 18" 24" 24" 24" 18" 18" 18" PIPE SLOPE OUT 4.29% 1.00% 0.50% 1.50% 0.50% 0.50% 0.89% 0.50% PIPE OUT (PUBLIC/PRIVATE)PIPE MATERIAL RCP RCP RCP RCP RCP RCP RCP RCP PUBLIC PUBLIC PUBLIC PUBLIC PUBLIC PUBLIC PUBLIC * * * * * REFER TO LINEAR PARK GRADING DETAIL SHEETS FOR INFORMATION ON CONNECTIONS TO AND FROM UNDERGROUND DETENTION AND CISTERN SYSTEMS. 6902LINEAR PARKGRADING &DRAINAGE PLAN GRADING NOTES 1.ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY AND ST. LOUIS PARK SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. WORK WITHIN WAYZATA BOULEVARD WILL REQUIRE A MNDOT ROW/UTILITY PERMIT. 2.CONTRACTOR TO CALL "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. TWIN CITIES METRO AREA: 651-454-0002 OR TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 3.CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OR EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS. 4.SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TO HELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES. WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT, THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF EXISTING PAVEMENT. 5.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL. 6.CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM SEWER ALIGNMENTS. 7.GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE TO SUBGRADE ELEVATION, LEAVE STREET READY FOR SUBBASE. 8.ALL EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ANY ABANDONED UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 9.REFER TO THE UTILITY PLAN FOR SANITARY SEWER MAIN, WATER MAIN SERVICE LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS AND CASTING / STRUCTURE SCHEDULE. 10. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS AND CURB AND GUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES WITH PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE. 11. INSTALL A MINIMUM OF 4" MNDOT CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE UNDER CURB AND GUTTER. 12. HAUL ROUTE SHALL BE WAYZAYTA BOULEVARD AND GAMBLE DRIVE TO PARK PLACE BOULEVARD TO HIGHWAY 394. 13. UPON COMPLETION OF EXCAVATION AND FILLING, CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL STREETS AND DISTURBED AREAS ON SITE. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RE-VEGETATED WITH CITY APPROVED GROUND COVER. 14. CONTRACTOR IS TO PLACE ALL MANHOLES OUTSIDE OF DRIVING LANES. GOPHER STATE CALL ONE REVISIONSNo.DATEALERT TO CONTRACTOR: 1. THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR THIS ISSUE. WHEN PERFORMING GRADING OPERATIONS DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER, PROVIDE ADEQUATE DEWATERING, DRAINAGE AND GROUND WATER MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS. REFER TO MASTER SITE SPECIFICATIONS. 2. ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS. City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Page 75 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A B C D E F G H I K 6905LINEAR PARKPHOTOMETRIC PLAN LIGHTING LEGEND CITY BOUNDARY LINE PROPERTY / ROW LINE GOPHER STATE CALL ONE REVISIONSNo.DATEALERT TO CONTRACTOR: 1. THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR THIS ISSUE. WHEN PERFORMING GRADING OPERATIONS DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER, PROVIDE ADEQUATE DEWATERING, DRAINAGE AND GROUND WATER MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS. REFER TO MASTER SITE SPECIFICATIONS. 2. ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS. City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Page 76 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A B C D E F G H I K 6906LINEAR PARKLANDSCAPEPLANALERT TO CONTRACTOR: 1. THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR THIS ISSUE. WHEN PERFORMING GRADING OPERATIONS DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER, PROVIDE ADEQUATE DEWATERING, DRAINAGE AND GROUND WATER MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS. REFER TO MASTER SITE SPECIFICATIONS. 2. ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS. GOPHER STATE CALL ONE REVISIONSNo.DATECity Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Page 77 Date: October 30, 2014 To: Sean Walther, City of St. Louis Park From: Jessica Laabs, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (651-643-0437) Subject: West End AUAR Analysis Update – DLC Residential proposal PURPOSE OF MEMO This memo summarizes results of sanitary sewer, water use, and traffic analyses for the purposes of evaluating a development proposal from DLC Residential as part of the overall West End Development. This proposal would change the land use from what was included in the Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) completed under state environmental regulations for the West End development. Results of the analyses were compared to the thresholds established in the 2007 AUAR and 2013 AUAR Update to ensure the proposed development is in conformance with the AUAR and would not incur additional impacts or require additional mitigation measures. ASSUMPTIONS Analyses were compared to the 2007 AUAR and the 2013 AUAR Update, specifically: 2007 AUAR/2013 AUAR Update Scenario 1  1.0 million square feet (SF) of office space  400,000 SF of retail space  250 condo units The AUAR studied multiple scenarios with varying levels and types of development, but Scenario 1 most closely represents the actual plans for the site and has been consistently used as a comparison in other analyses. Since 2007, and even since 2013, some of the planned development has changed. Most notably, planned condos were replaced with apartment units (The Flats at West End), and additional apartments are under construction or planned for construction on the former Chili’s and Olive Garden sites. Therefore, the existing condition or baseline includes current restaurant, retail, grocery, theater, 2nd story office, and apartments (453 total: 119 apartment units for the Flats at West End and 334 apartment units under construction or planned for the Chili’s and Olive Garden sites). The total capacity of the City of St. Louis Park’s water system is also used as a baseline for estimating utility impact. The baseline condition incorporates removal of the Novartis/Nestle facility in April 2013 and adds in recently planned reuse of the facility. With these existing conditions incorporated, an updated analysis was completed for the following scenario (as confirmed by the City of St. Louis Park and DLC Residential). City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Page 78 Revised Scenario 1A The bullets highlighted in gray represent changes in land use and densities and were incorporated into the analysis. For the purpose of this analysis, the high end of any range of development was used (i.e., 706,706 SF of office, 400 apartment units, and 200 hotel rooms).  Existing uses (restaurant, retail, grocery, theater, 2nd story office, apartments)  Two 9- to 11-story office buildings with a combined total of approximately 578,000 to 706,706 SF of Class A office space  Two 6-story residential apartment buildings totaling up to 400 units  A 6-story, limited service hotel with 150 to 200 rooms  A structured parking ramp tucked alongside the southbound ramp from I-394 to Hwy 100  A linear green space providing pedestrian and bicycle connections from 16th Street through the middle of the site to Golden Valley (publicly accessible but privately owned)  A circular transit bus turnaround at 16th Street and Utica Ave  Rebuild of the northern portion of Utica Avenue with a boulevard in the middle to match the current boulevard south of 16th Street SANITARY SEWER ANALYSIS Sanitary sewer use is not anticipated to be a limiting factor to development. As noted, the baseline condition has been adjusted to reflect removal of the Novartis/Nestle facility and the addition of recent planned redevelopment for that site. Sanitary use generated by the full buildout of the development falls beneath the thresholds identified in the AUAR and within the available capacity of the current MCES interceptor (7.4 million gallons per day (MGD)). See Table 1. The Metropolitan Council is also in the process of designing improvements to the current sanitary sewer system that are anticipated to increase the system capacity by 5 MGD (to 12.4 MGD total capacity). Construction of the sewer improvements are anticipated to be complete in 2015. Table 1. Net Sanitary Peak Flow AUAR Scenario 1 (2007/2013) Revised Scenario 1A (2014) Existing Average Daily Flow (MGD) 2.6 2.6 Average Daily Flow Increase (MGD) 0.269 0.503 Average Daily Flow Decrease (MGD) 0.044 0.506 Net Average Daily Flow Adjustment (MGD) 0.225 -0.003 Total Average Daily Flow (Existing + Net Flow Adjustment) (MGD) 2.825 2.597 Peak Hourly Flow (2.7 Peak Factor) (MGD) 7.628 7.01 Peak Hourly Flow (2.37 Peak Factor) (MGD) 6.695 6.154 City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Page 79 WATER USE ANALYSIS Water use could remain a limiting factor for the revised scenario. At 92.68 percent use of the system, the proposed development would result in less water use than what was identified in the original AUAR. However, as stated in the original AUAR, it is the City’s desire to remain under a 90 percent threshold. To remain within 90 percent capacity, additional mitigation measures or adjustments to development would be necessary. Table 2. Water Use Summary AUAR Scenario 1 (2007/2013) Revised Scenario 1A (2014) Total Firm System Capacity (MGD) 13.32 13.32 City Firm Peak Usage (MGD) 11.880 10.920 Capacity Available (MGD) 1.436 2.400 Proposed Project Usage (MGD) 0.638 1.425 Total City Usage (MGD) 12.518 12.345 Capacity Available (post-construction) (MGD) 0.802 0.975 Percent Total System Utilized 93.98% 92.68% TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Under the revised scenario, AUAR thresholds are exceeded in the AM peak hour (outbound movement)1 by 40 trips (Table 3). This translates to approximately one vehicle every 90 seconds. Table 3. Estimated Scenario 1A Traffic Compared to AUAR Thresholds AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour In Out In Out Estimated Trips Under Current Scenario 1,039 568 1,050 1,486 AUAR Trip Generation Limits 1,320 528 1,167 1,883 Mitigation measures identified in the AUAR were designed to accommodate the heaviest traffic period, which is the PM peak outbound as illustrated in Table 3. The traffic mitigation that has already been implemented for the West End development accommodates the PM peak. As illustrated in the table, the AM peak outbound movement is much lower than the PM peak. Therefore, it is unlikely that this exceedance in the AM peak hour will present a capacity issue or require additional mitigation. The mitigation measures implemented in previous phases of development already provide the capacity needed. Traffic is not anticipated to be a limiting factor to the proposed development. A more detailed summary of traffic is provided in Table 4. 1 Vehicles exiting the site City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Page 80 Table 4. Traffic Summary1 Revised Scenario 1A Land Use Land Use Size Daily Trips AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour In Out In Out Office 742,102 square feet 5,606 788 108 151 738 Retail (2 Restaurants Removed) 346,674 square feet 14,863 218 139 624 676 Condos 0 units 0 0 0 0 0 Apartments 853 units 5,672 85 341 331 178 Hotels 200 rooms 1,634 63 43 61 59 Trip Generation Subtotal 27,775 1,154 631 1,167 1,651 Multi-Use Reduction (-10%) -2,778 -115 -63 -117 -165 TOTAL 24,997 1,039 568 1,050 1,486 Percent Increase 5% -12% 61% 16% -9% AUAR Trip Generation Limits 1,320 528 1,167 1,883 1Trip generation calculations as documented in the West End AUAR, based on ITE Trip Generation, 7th Edition (2003). Current trip generation calculations based on the most recent version of ITE Trip Generation, 9th Edition (2012). SUMMARY Sanitary sewer usage generated by the revised scenario can be accommodated within the limits established in the original AUAR. No additional mitigation is needed. Water use is anticipated to be under the AUAR thresholds for the revised scenario. However, the City’s preferred 90 percent total system use would be exceeded. Additional mitigation measures or adjustments may be required. Traffic generated by the revised scenario is beneath the limits established in the original AUAR with the exception of AM peak (outbound) volumes. No additional mitigation measures or adjustments are anticipated at this time because the AM peak is accommodated in the capacity of the transportation system , which was designed to accommodate the higher PM peak volumes. City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Page 81 TRAVEL DEMAND MANAGEMENT PLAN The West End Redevelopment Central Park West St. Louis Park, MN Golden Valley, MN Prepared for: DLC Residential, LLC Central Park West, LLC Prepared by: March 2015 City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Page 82 INTRODUCTION This document serves as the Travel Demand Management (TDM) Plan for the Central Park West Site within the West End Redevelopment located in the southwest quadrant of I-394 and TH 100 (Figure 1). As expressed in this document, DLC Residential is committed to applying this TDM Plan to the proposed residential, hotel, and office buildings. The cities of St. Louis Park and Golden Valley have established an overlay zoning district and a joint task force to address congestion mitigation strategies. The Task Force reviews Travel Demand Management (TDM) Plans for development in the established I-394 overlay zoning district. The Central Park West West End Redevelopment site lies within Zone A of the overlay district (City of St. Louis Park Code, Article IV, Sections 36-321 through 36-330). PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Central Park West project consists of approximately 13.5 acres of new development on the site of previously razed office buildings. The Cities of Golden Valley and St. Louis Park each have jurisdiction within the site. The Central Park West Development will consist of a 199 unit apartment building, a 164 unit apartment building, an up to 150 room hotel, and up to 706,706 square feet of office space in two new office buildings. Construction of the first apartment building is anticipated to begin in spring 2015. Construction of the remaining residential, hotel, and office buildings will be phased with all construction anticipated to be completed by 2020. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND ALTERNATIVE TRANSIT OPPORTUNITIES Pedestrian and Bicycle The Central Park West development Site currently contains some sidewalk infrastructure along the south side of Wayzata Boulevard and the west side of Utica Avenue. The land on the proposed development is currently vacant and contains informal gravel lots off of unofficial curb cuts, old bituminous parking lots for the razed office buildings, and other vacant land. Utica Avenue and Wayzata Boulevard currently contain no dedicated bicycle infrastructure. However, the site is located a short distance from the Cedar Lake Trail, a bicycle and pedestrian pathway that runs from downtown Minneapolis to Chanhassen and other southwestern suburban communities. The Cedar Lake Trail carries a significant amount of commuter and recreational bicyclists. The Phase I area of the West End Development contains various pedestrian and bicycle amenities. Sidewalks were constructed along both sides of West 16 th Street and West End Boulevard, as well as adjoining sidewalks to the grocer tenant and the main passageway from West End Boulevard to Park Place Boulevard. Some sidewalks are separated from the street by pervious green space, and others contain various urban design elements like potters, benches, street lighting, waste receptacles, and artistic bollards. Crosswalks are designated by various brick and stone material that differs from the bituminous roadway. Sidewalk space is lacking on Duke Drive east of the main shopping street. Although there is no designated bike lane infrastructure on the roadways, bike racks are located in front of the grocery tenant and near other retail tenants throughout the development. Bike racks and shower facilities are available at the Moneygram building and the 1600 Towers south of the development for tenants who bike to work. City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Page 83 Transit The area is currently served by several bus routes operated by Metro Transit. The routes that serve the area are listed below: ·Route 9:The route 9 bus serves the site along Park Place Boulevard and Wayzata Boulevard, and also has limited service along Highway 100. This local bus service connects to Cedar Lake Road and travels west to County Road 73. It also provides service into Golden Valley to the north and east of the TMP area, and moves into downtown Minneapolis. It continues through downtown and terminates in south Minneapolis at the 46 th Street Blue Line LRT Station. Service is offered seven days a week all year. Buses on this route run from approximately 5:00 AM to 1:00 AM during the week. The route contains 15 to 20 minute headways during rush hour, 30 minute headways midday and evenings, and 30 to 60 minute headways on the weekend. ·Route 604:The route 604 bus runs west from the Park Place/I-394 Park & Ride lot near the Xenia-Park Place interchange down Wayzata Boulevard to the Louisiana Avenue Transit Center. It then continues south on Louisiana Avenue through St. Louis Park to Excelsior Boulevard, where it moves to and terminates at the Excelsior & Grand shopping district. Service is offered Monday through Friday during rush hour and midday periods, and runs from 7:30 AM to 4:30 PM. The route operates approximately once per hour during the service time. ·Route 649:The route 649 bus loops along Wayzata Boulevard, Park Place Boulevard, Cedar Lake Road and Louisiana Avenue and provides limited-stop service along I-394 into downtown Minneapolis. Service is offered Monday through Friday during rush hour periods. It operates from approximately 6:15 AM to 8:30 AM, and from 3:30 PM to 6:30PM. The route operates every 30 minutes during the service time. To encourage residents and visitors to utilize transit, expansion of existing routes – such as offering the 649 route every day during the week – should occur to serve the site. Adding new routes that run directly from the West End into downtown Minneapolis would also help facilitate higher transit ridership to and from the development. Surrounding Amenities The Central Park West development Site is across the street from The Shops at West End, which contain various types of restaurants, a movie theater, a Cub Foods grocery store, and other retail outlets. The site is also within walking distance to several other stores and restaurants across Park Place Boulevard, as well as an Olive Garden restaurant at the corner of Wayzata Boulevard and Utica Avenue. In addition, the existing Moneygram building has a fitness center facility complete with showers and locker rooms that is available to employees in the Moneygram and 1600 Tower buildings. The site is also near newly finished and currently under construction apartment buildings north of 16 th Street, as well as a Hilton-based Homewood Suites hotel. IMPLEMENTATION OF REQUIRED ROAD IMPROVEMENTS A number of roadway improvements were required by the AUAR and traffic study completed for the Central Park West development. The approved project site plan resulted in a refinement of the City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Page 84 improvements needed and these are outlined in the developer’s agreement between the City of St. Louis Park, the City of Golden Valley, and DLC Residential. The majority of the required improvements will be constructed between 2015 and 2020. As a result of these improvements being implemented, the intersections in and around the project are expected to operate at acceptable (LOS D or better) levels of service with the redevelopment. Planned Road Improvements Utica Avenue: ·Reconstruct existing section of Utica Avenue between Wayzata Boulevard and the Moneygram building entrance. Build four total vehicular lanes with a center grassy median separating northbound and southbound traffic. ·Construct a privately owned but publically accessible linear park past 16 th Street that will assist pedestrians and bicyclists to access the various buildings. These road and park improvements will be designed and constructed by DLC Residential. Planned Trail and Sidewalk Improvements In addition to road improvements a number of sidewalks will be added for pedestrian and bicycle mobility. The developer has agreed to: ·Construct improvements to the sidewalk on the south side of Wayzata Boulevard. ·Construct the linear park and fund all urban design elements within its grounds, including decorative lighting, benches, trash receptacles, and general open space that will be accessible to the public. GOAL AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES The overall goal of this plan is to reduce potential traffic congestion that will come with the proposed development. This will occur by maintaining or improving acceptable levels of service on the roadways within and adjacent to the project site, minimizing the projected number of trips through adjacent intersections during the PM peak hour, and continuously encouraging alternative transportation use within each component in the development. The general road improvements mixed with pedestrian amenities, bicycle infrastructure, and better transit service will all assist in achieving the goal. PROPOSED TMP STRATEGIES DLC Residential in coordination with building managers will pursue the following objectives and strategies to achieve its Traffic Management Plan. Objectives and Strategies TDM Friendly Design ·Mixed Use Development: A hotel and residential component have been proposed for the subjected site in phase one, and the proposed office space will be constructed in a future phase. The hotel and residential uses will help overall traffic flow because the two uses have traditionally different traffic flow peak times during the day. The Shops at West End will also encourage residents and hotel guests alike to stay nearby for shopping, entertainment, and grocery needs. This will reduce the number of vehicular trips that leave the site in the PM peak City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Page 85 hour. Commuters to the office buildings in the future will counter traffic flows from residents, thus decreasing the likelihood of concentrated roadway congestion. ·Residential Component: In the I-394 Overlay Zoning District language for both St. Louis Park and Golden Valley, it is encouraged to develop residential uses within the corridor to reduce PM peak traffic volumes in one direction. This development includes two separate 6-story apartment buildings containing 363 dwelling units. Residents in these units will likely either be reverse commuting from areas other than the West End vicinity in the afternoon, or will be working in the nearby office buildings, thus helping reduce PM traffic congestion. ·Shared Parking: A mixed-use development of this type provides opportunities for shared parking among different uses, reducing the overall number of parking spaces needed on-site. The fully built out pedestrian infrastructure within the site will help site users access shops, hotels, and residences by walking instead of driving. A parking structure in the east side of the property will help alleviate office parking concerns and spillover, and will improve direct traffic flow into the development. ·Designated Hotel Guest Parking: Hotel employees will be incited to park in areas that won’t create parking lot bottlenecks, and will be encouraged to seek alternative commuting methods like biking, walking, or taking transit. This will allow the hotel to hold sufficient parking spaces for its guests, thus reducing internal vehicular trips (guests driving around to find a more convenient parking space). The hotel lot will also have specific signage that will discourage non- guests from parking in that area. ·Underground Residential Parking: The development plan calls for underground parking for residents in the apartment buildings, thus reducing parking conflicts in surrounding hotel and office parking areas. ·Delivery Truck Reductions: Deliveries via truck will be minimized due to the general lack of need for shipments to the residential buildings. Delivery Trucks will be restricted to deliver between 10 pm and 8 am. Trucks needed for any use on the site will enter at the curb cut near the corner of Wayzata Boulevard and Lilac Lane. Garbage collection will be carefully scheduled during the day to minimize impacts on residents and public. ·Pedestrian Access: Sidewalks will be provided on both sides of Utica Avenue and on the south side of Wayzata Boulevard. Sidewalks within the site include the multi-use “woonerf” space and paved areas in the linear park. All sidewalks will have safe crossings at Utica Avenue so residents, hotel guests, and hotel workers can walk to nearby shops and restaurants instead of drive. ·Bicycle Access: Wayfinding signs will direct bicycle riders to ride south to the Cedar Lake Trail. Bicycles will also be allowed within the “woonerf” and linear park space. Bicycle parking will be included within Central Park West near both residential buildings and the hotel building. St. Louis Park requires that bicycle parking spaces equal 10% of total vehicle parking spaces. Approximately 477 bicycle spaces are planned to be placed within the site. Approximately 212 bicycle spaces will be installed the Phase 1 and 2 Residential Buildings, with the remaining 265 spaces installed for the Office. Additional required spaces can be provided if a need is identified. Participate with Regional TDM Organizations to Provide Information on Transportation Alternatives ·Create an office Commuter Benefits Coordinator (CBC) position to coordinate with Metro Transit and officials from trail network entities. City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Page 86 ·Inform residential concierge workers about transportation alternatives, who will then be able to notify residents about transit, biking, and walking options. Have concierge set up special commuter challenges at certain times of the year to encourage residents to try non-vehicular commutes. ·Inform hotel concierge workers about surrounding transportation amenities, who will then be able to advise guests to walk – instead of drive – to entertainment. ·Display transit and trail maps in locations within both residential buildings, the hotel, and future office buildings. Support and Promote Bicycling and Walking as Alternatives ·Build and maintain pedestrian-friendly space within and alongside development site. ·Prioritize pedestrian movements over automobile movements at intersections by designating crosswalks with different paving material and building pedestrian warning lights. ·Place bike wayfinding signs along Utica Avenue and within the linear park that direct bicyclists to the Cedar Lake Trail. ·Actively display updated biking information, such as commuting tips and trail maps, in the lobbies of each building. ·Add a fitness center and showers into one of the office buildings during the next development phase. These amenities will be accessible to employees who wish to walk or bike to work. Support and Promote Transit as an Alternative ·Encourage Metro Transit to increase frequency of existing service or add new direct service into downtown Minneapolis from turnaround area. ·Concierges in the apartment buildings and the hotel will facilitate the sale of bus passes to residents, and will provide detailed transit information to guests. The CBC will encourage office tenants to use alternative commuting methods, and will sell bus passes to employees. Support and Promote Carpooling and Vanpooling ·Have apartment concierge send surveys to residents to see if a potential carpool pairing would be possible. ·Distribute carpool and vanpool service information to residents. ·Look into viability to add parking spaces for rideshare services, such as ZipCar or HourCar. ·Rideshare parking spaces may be either added or designated. Monitoring ·Once apartment units are 75% occupied, send survey to residents to gather interest and supply information about alternative transportation. ·Have apartment concierge send periodic, bi-annual surveys to residents to discover transportation usage data. ·Evaluate effectiveness of strategies and modify the plan accordingly. City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Page 87 TDM IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Developer(s) will be responsible to implement this plan upon completion of the Central Park West development. These obligations will run with the land in the event that portions of the project are sold to third parties. The steps to plan implementation are outlined below: 1)Apartment and hotel concierge employees will be trained to serve as transportation coordinators and to follow plan implementation. These persons will coordinate with each other and with the Commuter Benefits Coordinator (CBC) in the future office buildings. 2)Once the hotel is operational and the apartment buildings are 75% occupied, the concierges will conduct a commuter survey to estimate participation in alternative modes of transportation. 3)The concierges will work with Metro Transit to inform all tenants regarding all alternative transportation options available to them for commuting. 4)The concierges will continuously encourage guests and residents to utilize and walk to the nearby entertainment, shopping, dining, and grocery tenants instead of drive to others. 5) The City of St. Louis Park is completing an updated traffic study of the area with the implemented road improvements. The City of Golden Valley has not committed to completing this study at this time. Once the St. Louis Park updated traffic study is completed, DLC Residential, building concierges, and the CBC will meet with staff from the City of St. Louis Park and the City of Golden Valley to determine if traffic is operating at acceptable levels. City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Page 88 TRAVEL MANAGEMENT MEASURE STATUS TARGET DATE TDM Friendly Design Mixed Use Development –establish uses with separate peak traffic flows 2020 Residential Component –build apartments nearby to lessen PM traffic 2018 Shared parking –between hotel and residential uses 2018 Hotel guest parking –ease of access for guests 2018 Underground apartment parking –ease of access for residents 2018 Delivery truck restrictions –innate lack of need for delivery services & restricted delivery times 2017 Pedestrian Access –establish good sidewalk connections 2017 Bicycle Access –establish good biking infrastructure 2017 TDM Organization Collaboration Create CBC position for office buildings 2020 Train residential concierges 2017 Train hotel concierges 2018 Display non-vehicular transportation information 2017 Incentivize residents to commute using alternative transportation 2017 Promote Walking & Biking Build and maintain good pedestrian spaces 2017 Create designated biking infrastructure 2017 Place wayfinding signs for bicyclists 2017 Actively update walking & biking information within building lobbies 2017 Promote Transit Use Encourage Metro Transit to extend service or add new service to area 2017 Have concierges facilitate selling bus passes to residents, and providing information to hotel guests. 2017 Promote Car/Vanpooling Have concierges pair residents for potential carpool arrangements 2017 City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Page 89 TRAVEL MANAGEMENT MEASURE STATUS TARGET DATE Distribute carpool & vanpool information to residents 2017 Look into viability for rideshare service implementation 2017 Look into adding or designating rideshare parking spaces 2017 Monitoring Send commuting survey to residents once apartment is 75% occupied and hotel is open 2018 Send occasional commuting surveys (twice a year) to residents to gather commuting trends 2017 Evaluate effectiveness of strategies and modify plan in coordination with concierges, CBC, and officials from the Cities of St. Louis Park and Golden Valley 2020 City Council Meeting of April 6, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Title: Central Park West Final Plat & Final Planned Unit Development Page 90