HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015/03/16 - ADMIN - Agenda Packets - City Council - RegularAGENDA
MARCH 16, 2015
(Mayor Jacobs Out)
6:45 p.m. SPECIAL STUDY SESSION – Community Room
Discussion Items
1. 45 min. Update on 2015 Minnesota Department of Transportation Construction Projects
7:30 p.m. CITY COUNCIL MEETING – Council Chambers
1. Call to Order
1a. Pledge of Allegiance
1b. Roll Call
2. Presentations
2a. Recognition for City Clerk Nancy Stroth’s Retirement After 15 Years of Service
3. Approval of Minutes
3a. Study Session Minutes February 23, 2015
4. Approval of Agenda and Items on Consent Calendar
NOTE: The Consent Calendar lists those items of business which are considered to be routine and/or which
need no discussion. Consent items are acted upon by one motion. If discussion is desired by either a
Councilmember or a member of the audience, that item may be moved to an appropriate section of the regular
agenda for discussion. The items for the Consent Calendar are listed on the last page of the Agenda.
Recommended Action: Motion to approve the Agenda as presented and items listed on the Consent Calendar; and to waive
reading of all resolutions and ordinances. (Alternatively: Motion to add or remove items from the agenda,
or move items from Consent Calendar to regular agenda for discussion.)
5. Boards and Commissions – None
6. Public Hearings – None
7. Requests, Petitions, and Communications from the Public -- None
8. Resolutions, Ordinances, Motions and Discussion Items
8a. 2015 Connect the Park! Projects
Recommended Action: Motion to Adopt the following Resolutions:
• Resolution accepting the project report for Project No. 4015-2000, approving plans
and specifications and authorizing advertisement for bids for segments A-E
(Pavement Management project segments).
• Resolution accepting the project report for Project No. 4015-2000, approving plans
and specifications and authorizing advertisement for bids for segments F-I (MSA
segments).
• Resolution accepting the project report for Project No. 4015-2000, approving plans
and specifications and authorizing advertisement for bids for segments J-R (Connect
the Park project segments).
Meeting of March 16, 2015
City Council Agenda
Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. To make arrangements, please call
the Administration Department at 952/924-2525 (TDD 952/924-2518) at least 96 hours in advance of meeting.
8b. Project Report: Municipal State Aid Project - Walker/36th Street - Project No. 4015-1100
Recommended Action: Motion to Adopt Resolution accepting the project report,
establishing Improvement Project No. 4015-1100, approving plans and specifications,
and authorizing advertisement for bids.
8c. Traffic Study No. 651: Authorize Parking Restrictions on Ottawa Avenue (28th Street &
Highway 25)
Recommended Action: Motion to Adopt Resolution authorizing installation of Ottawa
Avenue Parking Restrictions.
8d. Conditional Use Permit for Excavation at 4106 Forest Lane
Recommended Action: Motion to Adopt Resolution approving a Conditional Use
Permit (CUP) to export approximately 816 cubic yards of fill, subject to conditions
recommended by staff.
8e. Bee-Safe Community Resolution
Recommended Action: Motion to Adopt Resolution endorsing “Bee-Safe” policies and
procedures.
9. Communications -- None
Meeting of March 16, 2015
City Council Agenda
CONSENT CALENDAR
4a. Adopt Resolution authorizing installation of “No Parking” restrictions west on Toledo
Avenue on 26th Street.
4b. Approve the Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance rezoning Meadowbrook Golf
Course from R-1 Single Family Residential District to Park and Open Space District
and authorize summary publication.
4c. Adopt Resolution approving acceptance of a Metropolitan Livable Communities Act
Grant from the Metropolitan Council in the amount of $50,000 for the exploration of
soils in Wolfe Park/The Rec Center.
4d. Approve an Agreement between the City and Hennepin County to agree to work
together to further the goals of the Southwest Corridor Investment Framework.
4e. Adopt Resolution in Support of Legislation Establishing an Early Voting Process for
voters in Minnesota.
4f. Approve for filing Planning Commission meeting minutes of February 4, 2015.
4g. Approve for filing Environment & Sustainability Commission: Sustainable SLP
meeting minutes of February 4, 2015.
St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority and regular City Council meetings are carried live on Civic TV cable channel
17 and replays are frequent; check www.parktv.org for the schedule. The meetings are also streamed live on the internet at
www.parktv.org, and saved for Video on Demand replays. The agenda is posted on Fridays on the official city bulletin board in
the lobby of City Hall and on the text display on Civic TV cable channel 17. The agenda and full packet are available by noon
on Friday on the city’s website.
Meeting: Special Study Session
Meeting Date: March 16, 2015
Discussion Item: 1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Update on 2015 Minnesota Department of Transportation Construction Projects
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff would like to provide the Council with information
regarding MnDOT construction projects in the west metro. Staff has also provided background
information regarding the traffic concerns on or adjacent to the bridge at Hwy 7 and Wooddale.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: None at this time.
SUMMARY: MnDOT has a number of projects in the west metro this year. The one the City
has been closely involved with is the Highway 100 reconstruction project. MnDOT has provided
staff with details regarding two other projects which will have impacts to traffic in and around
the City of St. Louis Park. These projects are on Highway 394 and on Highway 494 and more
information can be found at the links below.
• I-394: http://www.dot.state.mn.us/metro/projects/i394minneapolis/
• I-494: http://www.dot.state.mn.us/metro/projects/i494plymouth/
Information regarding Highway 100 can be found at the link below.
• TH100 Reconstruction: http://www.dot.state.mn.us/metro/projects/hwy100slp/
Additional information is in the Discussion section of this report.
VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged
community.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion
Hwy 100 Communication Plan
MnDOT Hennepin County Project Map
I-394 Handout
I-494 Handout
Prepared by: Debra M. Heiser, Engineering Director
Reviewed by: Joe Shamla, Sr. Engineering Project Engineer
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
Special Study Session Meeting of March 9, 2015 (Item No. 1) Page 2
Title: Update on 2015 Minnesota Department of Transportation Construction Projects
DISCUSSION
Background:
The following MnDOT roads are under construction in and around the City of St. Louis Park in 2015:
• TH100 Reconstruction: http://www.dot.state.mn.us/metro/projects/hwy100slp/
This project is underway. Engineering and Communications staff are attending weekly
meetings to monitor the progress, provide feedback, and coordinate communication. We do
not have a definitive date for the closure of the Minnetonka Blvd Bridge, but will
communicate that information when it is available. Project completion is in late 2016.
• I-394: http://www.dot.state.mn.us/metro/projects/i394minneapolis/
A resurfacing project on I-394 between Highway 100 and I-94 in Minneapolis will require
reducing the road to two lanes (work on eastbound and westbound I-394 will happen
independently) for 14 days and closing some ramps and the Lyndale Avenue Bridge over
Dunwoody Boulevard. Expected project duration is 28 days.
• I-494: http://www.dot.state.mn.us/metro/projects/i494plymouth/
The two-year project on I-494 will result in a third lane between Highway 55 and the I-
94/694 interchanges, and safer, longer-lasting roads, ramps and bridges. The construction
will require full, weekend closures of the interstate, short and long term ramp closures, and
reducing the road to three lanes on one side of the interstate (two lanes one direction, one
lane in the opposite direction). This project will be completed in fall 2016.
Public Involvement
MnDOT hosted a public meeting on Highway 100 construction at AAA in February. In addition
to an in-depth discussion on the impacts and schedule for the Highway 100 project, they
provided the public with information on these additional projects.
Since then, MnDOT has held three different public open houses on the I-494 project. The
meeting included an overview of the eight mile construction project on I-494 between I-394 in
Minnetonka and the I-94/694 Interchange in Plymouth and Maple Grove. Open house attendees
also learned about other construction projects on neighboring roads: Highways 12 and 610 and I-
394.
MnDOT has also indicated that they will be holding a public meeting on the I-394 work in the
coming months.
Staff has been attending these public meetings to ensure that we are aware of the details
presented, and available to the attendees.
Communication Plan
These are MnDOT projects, so they will be taking the lead on communication. However, City
staff will be supplementing their communication efforts with additional neighborhood outreach.
Attached is the City’s Communication Plan for the Hwy 100 project.
Traffic
Our experience with traffic detours and shifts in traffic control for the Highway 7/ Louisiana is
that immediately following the change implementation, traffic takes about one week to establish
patterns and fall into a routine. During that first week, staff will observe where the pressure
points appear and backups occur. If, after the first week and a half, there are areas that
consistently have safety or backup issues. We would evaluate and implement potential
mitigation measures.
Special Study Session Meeting of March 9, 2015 (Item No. 1) Page 3
Title: Update on 2015 Minnesota Department of Transportation Construction Projects
Citizen Response: The City’s Traffic Committee has developed a process for staff to respond to
traffic concerns as they arise. This is a group made up of staff from the police department,
engineering, zoning, and operations. We meet monthly to review questions and concerns that are
brought to us by property owners about traffic and parking throughout the City. However, staff
felt it was important to be more responsive for construction traffic related concerns. Our goal is
to provide a response to traffic concerns associated with MnDOT projects within 3 business
days. If the concern comes up during the first week after the traffic shift, this response may take
up to 10 business days.
Joe Shamla, Sr. Engineering Project Manager, will be the main point of contact for all questions
regarding traffic associated with MnDOT projects. When a request is received, he will forward
it to the traffic committee. The Police will go out and monitor the situation to see what, if
anything, can be done to mitigate the concern. Mitigation can include the following temporary
measures:
Low Cost
• Speed signs
• No Parking signs
• Road closure- using temporary traffic barriers
• Stop signs
• Traffic circles- using traffic barrels
• Police enforcement
• Centerline pedestrian crosswalk signs
High Cost
• Temporary traffic signals
• Flagger directing traffic during peak hours
The type of measure recommended will depend on the behavior observed in the field. Low cost
measures could be implemented by the City. High cost measures could be coordinated with
MnDOT for implementation.
Wooddale and Highway 7
MnDOT completed a warrant analysis for the permanent traffic signals at the ramp approaches at
Wooddale Ave. Their warrant analysis concluded that the intersections did not meet warrants.
As a result, they will not agree to reimburse us for the cost to install these signals. Staff
continues to push MnDOT on this issue. Note that as part of the SWLRT project signals will be
installed and paid via the project budget. However, the installation of these permanent signals
could be a few years out.
Additional modeling has been completed for these ramp terminals to ease traffic and safety
concerns until the permanent signals are installed. Staff has been discussing the following
measures with MnDOT:
1. Stop Signs-
• The City and MnDOT staff discussed traffic control options to improve the safety and
operations of these ramp intersections during peak hour conditions. Based on our
discussion, SRF has completed an analysis of all-way stop control at the Highway 7
and Wooddale Avenue ramp intersections.
• The operations analysis was conducted based on the 2014 p.m. peak hour traffic
volumes and does not account for traffic diversion from the Highway 100
construction project.
Special Study Session Meeting of March 9, 2015 (Item No. 1) Page 4
Title: Update on 2015 Minnesota Department of Transportation Construction Projects
• The results indicate that the 2014 operations with all-way stop control and current
lane geometry (one lane in each direction with turn lanes) will be congested
(borderline acceptable/unacceptable for the north ramp), but safer for on-/off-ramp
access. Northbound queues on Wooddale Avenue will extend back into the signalized
intersection at 36th Avenue during the p.m. peak hour causing unacceptable levels of
service.
• The results indicate that the 2014 operations with all-way stop control and Wooddale
Avenue restriped to a four-lane roadway will still be congested but operate at an
acceptable level of service, safer for on-/off-ramp access, and northbound queues on
Wooddale Avenue will reach but not extend into the signalized intersection at 36th
Avenue.
Estimated Cost: $2,500
Additional items to consider for this measure:
• With all way stop control at the ramps, it will require more time for traffic to recover
and clear after a freight rail event.
• The road was restriped to improve safety at the regional trail crossing. Changing the
road to 4 lanes will mean that trail users will have to go back to crossing four lanes of
vehicular traffic. Centerline crosswalks signs or a flashing pedestrian crossing
beacon could be installed to assist with compliance at this crossing.
• Stop signs will increase side street delays at the south frontage road. It is
recommended that these intersections should be posted no left turns during the
morning and evening peak hours for motorists leaving the frontage road.
• Overall the system will experience more delay, but the exit ramp approaches will
have reduced delay.
• With all way stop control at the ramps, it will require more time for traffic to recover
and clear after a freight rail event.
• Congestion in this area may encourage motorists to use alternative routes during peak
hour conditions.
2. Traffic Signals-
• Permanent installation: If the City wanted to move ahead with installing the signals
now we would need to obtain MnDOT approval, coordinate with the railroad on a
signal preemption agreement, and allow for SWLRT project office (SPO) review. It
is anticipated that it would take around 6 months to develop plans and obtain the
required approvals.
Estimated Cost: $750,000
• Temporary installation: Staff has been discussing the installation of temporary signals
at this location. MnDOT indicated that it would take up to 3 weeks to design, with a
cost of $150,000. Initial conversations indicate that it would require railroad signal
preemption, with a cost of $150,000 to $400,000. We are waiting to hear how long
this would take to coordinate.
Estimated Cost: $300,000 to $550,000.
Staff continues to push MnDOT on these concerns and is evaluating other solutions. We will
have additional information for the Council meeting on Monday.
Highway 100 Reconstruction
City of St. Louis Park Communications Plan
Goals
• To continually educate community members about the impacts of construction
• To educate residents about the ease of getting to businesses
• To encourage residents to support local businesses during construction
• To focus on areas of concern not handled by MnDOT
Strategies
Three main timing components to the communications:
1. Weekly – Most web-based updates (website, social media, Nextdoor), MnDOT emails
2. Monthly – Life in the Park segment
3. Bi-Monthly/Quarterly – Park Perspective Newsletter, Parks & Recreation Brochure. (Postcards
and letters as necessary)
Website – The city’s website has a Hwy 100 project page that will include links to the MnDOT website,
project contacts, timeline, etc. The homepage of the city website will also have a spot dedicated to a
quick link to this page.
Social Media – A series of informal messages regarding traffic impacts and project updates will be
linked to the city’s web article and/or MnDOT’s website on Facebook, Twitter and Nextdoor.
ParkAlert Citizen Notification System – Utilize for major closures, detours, impacts. We will set up a
Hwy 100 construction sign-up list and draw shape boundaries.
Neighborhood Outreach
• Monthly updates (the same that are compiled for email updates) will be provided to
neighborhood leaders for inclusion in their publications and website
• Monthly Neighborhood Connections e-newsletter sent out by Community Liaison
• Neighborhood Meetings – Present at Police Department neighborhood meetings
• National Night Out – Attend nearby neighborhood parties
Cable Television – We’ll highlight the construction progress in several ways:
• Monthly updates from project engineer that will be featured on Life in the Park.
• Cable TV Billboard announcements (the informal screens that run on the Cable TV system
between programming)
Park Perspective Newsletter – This city-wide publication will include a progress report/project update
in each publication during the course of the project. Also, we’ll utilize the Parks & Recreation Brochure,
published three times a year, as needed.
Sun Sailor – Paid advertising, pitch stories to Seth Rowe, Community Notes section.
Maps – Print project maps and display in various city facilities and public buildings; directional maps.
Special Study Session Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 1)
Title: Update on 2015 Minnesota Department of Transportation Construction Projects Page 5
Communication tools to be utilized in plan
Communication Tool Description Deadlines
City Website
www.stlouispark.org Varies, allow 24-hours’ notice to
post an article to the website(s);
If you need assistance writing the
article, please allow 72 hours.
Facebook www.facebook.com/stlouispark
potential MnDOT Facebook page
Allow 24 hours’ notice to post;
You’re encouraged to write posts
ahead of time; can be scheduled.
Twitter www.twitter.com/stlouispark
potential MnDOT twitter account
Please allow 24 hours’ notice to
post; Tweets must be 140
characters or less.
Nextdoor (www.nextdoor.com) Private social network for
neighborhoods
Allow 24 hours’ notice for posts.
ParkAlert Citizen Notification
System
www.stlouispark.org/parkalert/parkalert-
citizen-notification-system.html
Allow 12 hours’ notice.
Neighborhood Newsletters Many neighborhoods publish several
newsletters, Breanna’s e-newsletter
Deadlines vary; Breanna
Erickson is the contact.
TV Billboard Advertisements Informal screens that run on the Cable
TV system between programming on
the city’s five Cable TV channels
Varies, please allow up to one
week for creation and
scheduling.
Life in the Park Weekly city TV news how airing on
cable channels 14, 15/96, 16, 17 and
YouTube (www.youtube.com/slpcable)
Information for script due Fridays
at noon. Contact Scott Smith.
Public Service
Announcements/Special
Programming
Custom Hwy 100 project updates –
quarterly?
Allow one week for production.
Constant Contact Email newsletters/blasts Deadlines vary; allow one week
for content development.
Sun Sailor Local media Deadlines vary; Sun Sailor has a
5 p.m. deadline on Wednesdays
for publication the following week
City Publications Park Perspective Newsletter (PP)
Parks & Recreation Brochure (P&R)
PP – Arrive in homes Feb. 15,
May 15, July 15, Oct. 15
(Content deadline one month
prior)
P&R – Arrive in homes March 1,
Aug. 1, Nov. 1 (Content deadline
1 ½ months prior)
St. Louis Park Communications Contact:
Nicole Pribbenow | Interim Communications & Marketing Coordinator
Office (952) 924-2630
npribbenow@stlouispark.org
Special Study Session Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 1)
Title: Update on 2015 Minnesota Department of Transportation Construction Projects Page 6
B
C
D
A
Updated: January 27, 2015
Special Study Session Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 1)
Title: Update on 2015 Minnesota Department of Transportation Construction Projects Page 7
Special Study Session Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on 2015 Minnesota Department of Transportation Construction ProjectsPage 8
Special Study Session Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on 2015 Minnesota Department of Transportation Construction ProjectsPage 9
Special Study Session Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on 2015 Minnesota Department of Transportation Construction ProjectsPage 10
Special Study Session Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on 2015 Minnesota Department of Transportation Construction ProjectsPage 11
Special Study Session Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on 2015 Minnesota Department of Transportation Construction ProjectsPage 12
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: March 16, 2015
Presentation: 2a
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Recognition for City Clerk Nancy Stroth’s Retirement After 15 Years of Service
RECOMMENDED ACTION: The Mayor is asked to read the certificate and recognize City
Clerk Nancy Stroth for her 15 years of service to the City of St. Louis Park.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: None at this time.
SUMMARY: City policy states that employees who retire or resign in good standing with over
10 years of service will be presented with a framed certificate from the Mayor, City Manager and
City Council.
Nancy Stroth is retiring from public service after more than 15 years of service to the City. She
will focus her newfound time on caring for her parents and spending more time on her arts and
crafts. Nancy will be in attendance at this meeting. The Mayor is asked to read the certificate
and present it to her in recognition of her years of service.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Not applicable.
Prepared by: Ali Timpone, HR Coordinator
Reviewed by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: March 16, 2015
Minutes: 3a
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
FEBRUARY 23, 2015
The meeting convened at 6:30 p.m.
Councilmembers present: Mayor Jeff Jacobs, Tim Brausen, Steve Hallfin, Gregg Lindberg,
Anne Mavity, Susan Sanger, and Jake Spano.
Councilmembers absent: None.
Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), Director of Operations & Recreation (Ms.
Walsh), Director of Engineering (Ms. Heiser), Senior Engineering Project Manager (Mr.
Sullivan), Public Works Superintendent (Mr. Hanson), Utilities Superintendent (Mr. Hall),
Public Works Services Manager (Mr. Merkley), Solid Waste Program Coordinator (Ms. Fisher),
and Recording Secretary (Ms. Hughes).
Guests: Mr. Charles Nauen and Mr. David Zoll (Lockridge Grindal Nauen PLLP).
1. Future Study Session Agenda Planning – March 9, 2015
Mr. Harmening presented the proposed study session agenda for March 9th.
Councilmember Brausen advised that he was recently contacted by someone interested in the
5205 Parkdale property which is zoned Industrial Park and there was a question about whether
Council would consider changing the zoning and whether Council would consider placing a
moratorium on the zoning. He requested that Council place this matter on a future study session
agenda for further discussion.
2. Update on Reilly Site
Ms. Walsh presented the staff report and introduced Mr. Charles Nauen and Mr. David Zoll.
Mr. Hanson provided brief historical background regarding the Reilly site and explained how the
ground water contamination occurred on the site and the resulting 1986 Consent Decree. He
presented several maps of the site and advised there is some concern that contaminants are
traveling in a southerly direction towards Edina and Hopkins. He stated that the 1986 Consent
Decree indicates that Reilly is responsible for all capital costs and the City is responsible for all
operational, maintenance and monitoring costs to make sure the system is functioning properly.
He also discussed the City’s annual costs and described the functions of source control and
gradient control.
Councilmember Sanger asked if there was any way to completely remove the contaminants.
Mr. Hanson replied there was no monetarily feasible way to remove all contaminants and stated
there is no new technology that would change the overall process for treating and removing the
contaminants from the site.
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 3a) Page 2
Title: Study Session Minutes of February 23, 2015
Mr. Nauen explained that they were retained to assist with reducing the City’s ongoing costs
associated with monitoring and pumping by having modernized parameters in place for testing
and by reducing the pumping in the shallow aquifers. He discussed the actions taken by the EPA
in August 2013 whereby the EPA began to process a referral to the Department of Justice for
enforcement action against the City for not complying with the Consent Decree and advised that
since that time, they have worked to reestablish a relationship with the EPA, MPCA and
Department of Health.
Mr. Zoll discussed the testing required under the Consent Decree and stated that 31 compounds
are required to be tested while typical testing that would be required today would test for 16 of
those compounds instead of 31, adding there are very few labs that can test for these 31 items.
He stated currently those items are compared against the drinking water standards established in
the Consent Decree from 30 years ago and a lot of research has been done since that time with
the general consensus being that these chemicals are less risky than assumed 30 years ago.
Mr. Nauen advised that the City has proposed a gradient control plan that includes pumping at
wells W23 and SLP 10/15 with the idea of mitigating movement of substances south and east
toward Edina. He stated the EPA initially rejected this plan and the EPA wanted pumping done
at the Methodist Hospital well but this well has been shut down by the hospital so this will
require reanalysis by the EPA. He advised that they anticipate receiving a response from the
EPA regarding the City’s request to update the testing parameters by mid-year; in the meantime,
the City has drafted proposed changes to the Consent Decree. He stated they have established a
good relationship with the Region 5 EPA administrative lawyer who is referring this matter to
the Department of Justice so that the Department of Justice can approve the changes to the
Consent Decree, however, that referral has not yet been made. He also discussed the rationale
for reducing or eliminating pumping in the aquifers and the associated costs.
Councilmember Mavity acknowledged that one of the goals is cost reduction related to the
testing required under the Consent Decree but it was important to remember that the #1 priority
has been and continues to be environmental safety and purity of the drinking water.
Councilmember Sanger stated it appears that the status quo is not serving the City’s needs or the
needs of the EPA and questioned why the EPA appears to be dragging its feet on updating the
Consent Decree and agreeing to modernize the testing standards.
Mr. Zoll explained that there are some professional differences between the agencies and the
EPA has authority under the Consent Decree to require additional actions and to modify the
status quo. He stated they have been having discussions with the EPA about making sure the
best science is being utilized and then figuring out what makes the most sense in terms of the
updated standards.
Councilmember Spano noted that the City’s current annual cost of $700,000 is about 2.2% of the
City’s annual budget and asked about the annual cost when the Consent Decree was negotiated
and the corresponding percentage of the budget. He also asked if the City has ever quantified the
amount of money it would take to completely remove the contaminants.
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 3a) Page 3
Title: Study Session Minutes of February 23, 2015
Mr. Hanson indicated that every aquifer has a different geological structure and there is no way
to attach a dollar figure to eliminating the contamination, adding that containment and natural
attenuation of contaminants is the best process along with continued technological progress and
updating of standards. He stated that the City is spending a lot of money to mitigate or control
contamination to a nominal unit level of one (as required by the Consent Decree) when the
standard would be closer to a unit level of 1,000 if more modern science were used.
It was the consensus of the City Council to direct staff to continue efforts to amend the Consent
Decree related to the Reilly site to lower the City’s annual cost while continuing to be
environmentally responsible.
3. 2015 Connect the Park! Update
Mr. Sullivan presented the staff report and proposed 2015 Connect the Park! projects and
segment amendments.
Mayor Jacobs supported the proposed 2015 Connect the Park! projects.
Councilmember Hallfin also supported the proposed 2015 Connect the Park! projects.
Councilmember Sanger supported the proposed 2015 Connect the Park! projects and stated she
felt the proposal to add a sidewalk through the Lake Forest neighborhood was a good idea but
this sidewalk has not yet been through a public process and there are a number of people who
will be upset about the proposed sidewalk. She stated she was okay with discussing this
sidewalk on March 2nd but it needs to have a neighborhood meeting soon. She thanked staff for
their willingness to move up the construction of the Barry Street segment and stated that the
adjacent townhome association has asked that the sidewalk be moved to the east side of Barry
and she supported that change.
Councilmember Lindberg reiterated his concern about the incremental creep cost of continuing
to add segments to the Connect the Park! plan and wanted to make sure the City is making the
wisest big picture policy decisions and not rubber stamping requests for additional segments.
Councilmember Mavity supported the proposed 2015 Connect the Park! projects. She requested
that Council be provided with an overview of planned projects in the outer years of the CIP and
discuss whether there is any room for moving projects around.
Councilmember Brausen stated he has attended the public meetings regarding the sidewalk on
16th and Flag and also Texas Avenue where some of the neighbors have opposed the plan. He
stated he would not be present at the March 2nd Council meeting and requested that Council
postpone action on that segment and the Texas Avenue segment until his return.
It was the consensus of the City Council to receive public comment on March 2, 2015, including
the public opposition referenced by Councilmember Brausen related to the Flag Avenue and
Texas Avenue segments and to direct staff to prepare a resolution authorizing advertisement for
bids on the 2015 Connect the Park! projects with the Flag Avenue and Texas Avenue segments
done as a bid alternate.
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 3a) Page 4
Title: Study Session Minutes of February 23, 2015
4. Recycling Efforts and Goals
Ms. Walsh presented the staff report and introduced Ms. Kala Fisher, the City’s new Solid Waste
Program Coordinator.
Ms. Fisher discussed the three proposed goals and supporting objectives and explained that only
an estimated 2% of residential and business waste is comprised of polystyrene food containers
and an estimated 3% is single use plastic bags. She explained the rationale for not focusing on
only these two materials and for making sure the City provides assistance to businesses to
provide better recycling options and making sure resources are aimed at reducing the solid waste
stream, adding that those focuses have helped staff shift away from a materials ban and instead
suggesting that a targeted education campaign be pursued. She stated a large portion of the
business community is not ready to comply with the State’s recycling mandate effective on
January 1, 2016, and the City is ready to leverage County resources to begin this education
process related to recycling and organics, including incentives to recognize St. Louis Park
businesses for their recycling efforts.
Councilmember Sanger agreed with the suggested approach regarding organics but did not
support the approach regarding single use plastic bags or polystyrene. She stated there has been
decades of public awareness about the problems caused by plastic bags and Styrofoam and did
not think their use would be eliminated unless it was mandated. She suggested the City conduct
a year of education and then implement a total ban on polystyrene and plastic bags, either by
banning them or charging extra for these items and requiring businesses to remit the fee back to
the City to use for environmental improvement programs. She stated that Byerly’s keeps track of
customers who bring in reusable bags and donates 5¢ for each reusable bag to Second Harvest
and she felt this represented a good promotional opportunity for companies and would allow
them to take credit for their recycling efforts.
Councilmember Brausen agreed with Councilmember Sanger and stated that evidence confirms
that polystyrene is a dirty process that fills up the landfills and he continued to strongly favor
banning these products, adding he was happy to devote the necessary staff resources and money
to promote business recycling and organics recycling.
Councilmember Mavity stated she supported the targeted education on recycling and organics.
She agreed with Councilmembers Sanger and Brausen about banning these products and
requested further information about staff capacity. She suggested that Council support the
proposed targeted education and have further discussion about what it would take to impose a
ban at some point in the future.
Councilmember Lindberg supported the proposal laid out in the staff report. He felt that a
materials ban was the right thing to do but questioned how such a ban would be enforced and
also questioned the City’s role.
Councilmember Hallfin felt that the City needed to put pressure on the State and County to take
action on banning these materials, adding he agreed with Councilmembers Sanger and Brausen
that the City needs to move forward with pursuing a ban on these products.
Councilmember Spano spoke in favor of Councilmember Sanger’s suggested approach.
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 3a) Page 5
Title: Study Session Minutes of February 23, 2015
Mayor Jacobs stated the goal is to get rid of single use plastic bags and Styrofoam but there
needed to be a more robust public process on this matter. He also agreed with the targeted
education approach suggested in the staff report.
Mr. Harmening stated the overall goal of solid waste and organics recycling is to reduce the
volume of material going into the burner or landfill and when staff developed its
recommendations, it considered what impact a materials ban would have in terms of reducing the
material going into the landfill and determined the impact would be very small and the City
could have a greater impact by growing its organics and recycling programs. He suggested that
Council implement the targeted education campaign and voluntary effort to ban plastic bags and
polystyrene and later decide whether to implement a materials ban.
Councilmember Sanger felt that banning plastic bags and polystyrene were equally important as
organics recycling. She stated she has repeatedly questioned why the City cannot have curbside
pickup of plastic bags and have been told there is no place to recycle them but there are retailers
who take plastic bags for recycling so there is some means of getting rid of these bags.
Ms. Fisher stated that plastic bags create havoc for Materials Recovery Facilities (MRF) when
these items go through the system so Waste Management’s MRF does not collect plastic bags for
recycling. She stated the City could encourage businesses to offer plastic bag recycling through
the education campaign.
Councilmember Mavity supported staff’s proposal and stated it will be important for the City to
be strategic in its direction and figure out who will help the City and be a champion for this
cause.
Councilmember Brausen felt it was a moral imperative to ban this unhealthy substance in the
community and stated he did not believe that enforcement would be a significant issue.
Councilmember Lindberg stated if a materials ban is going to be implemented, it would be
important to consider the staff resources required and how a ban would impact the average St.
Louis Park resident and small business owner.
Council continued its discussion about targeted education and a public process toward
implementing a materials ban.
Mr. Harmening suggested that the City’s message to various stakeholders indicate that the City
Council is considering a ban on polystyrene and single use plastic bags and articulate the reasons
why Council is considering the ban, followed by a robust public process including
communication with residents and businesses. He suggested that the City also talk to County
and State officials encouraging them to get on board with a materials ban and to have a public
hearing where Council receives public testimony on the issue. He suggested that staff prepare a
document outlining next steps and a timeline for review with Council at a future study session.
It was the consensus of the City Council to support staff’s proposal regarding organics and
recycling. It was also the consensus of the City Council to support Mr. Harmening’s suggested
approach regarding next steps.
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 3a) Page 6
Title: Study Session Minutes of February 23, 2015
Communications/Meeting Check-In (Verbal)
Mr. Harmening advised that the League of Minnesota Cities has drafted a resolution and is
encouraging municipalities to adopt a resolution supporting a comprehensive transportation
funding package.
It was the consensus of the City Council to place the resolution supporting a comprehensive
transportation funding package on the March 9th City Council agenda for adoption.
Mr. Harmening stated that Council recently received an email from an organization asking
Council to adopt a resolution supporting a day without violence and asked if Council was
interested in adopting this resolution.
Councilmember Sanger pointed out that in the past, Council adopted resolutions only if it was
directly related to the community.
It was the consensus of the City Council to not take action on the resolution supporting a day
without violence.
Mr. Harmening stated the Home Remodeling Fair was held yesterday and approximately 1,000
people attended the event.
Mayor Jacobs adjourned the meeting at 9:01 p.m.
Written reports provided and documented for recording purposes only:
5. SWLRT Updates
6. January 2015 Monthly Financial Report
______________________________________ ______________________________________
Nancy Stroth, City Clerk Jeff Jacobs, Mayor
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: March 16, 2015
Consent Agenda Item: 4a
TITLE: Traffic Study No. 650: Authorize Installation of “No Parking” Restrictions West of
Toledo Avenue on 26th Street
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution authorizing installation of “No
Parking” restrictions west on Toledo Avenue on 26th Street.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: The restriction is allowed per the City’s established regulatory
authority.
SUMMARY: The Minnesota Department of Transportation is working on the Highway 100
reconstruction project. During this project, the storm water run-off on TH100 must be monitored
throughout construction. The monitoring site for this will be located at the end of 26th Street,
west of Toledo Avenue. It is vital that the monitoring site can be accessed at all times. Because
of this the staff is proposing to prohibit parking on 26th Street west of Toledo Avenue.
Prohibiting parking at this location also provides a benefit to Operations staff. Vehicles
currently parking in the area often make it difficult to remove and store snow. A light pole for
the pedestrian bridge is also located in the general vicinity. Prohibiting parking at this location
provides better access for snow removal and storage as well as work required to the lighting
system. The proposed parking restrictions are shown on the attached figure.
The Traffic Committee discussed the issue and recommends parking restrictions at this location
to provide access for MnDOT staff as well as City of St. Louis Park Operations staff.
PUBLIC INPUT: A letter was mailed to adjacent property owners in November requesting
comments on the proposed installation of parking restrictions. There were zero (0) responses to
that inquiry.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The cost of enacting these controls is
minimal and will come out of the general operating budget.
VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution
Map
Prepared by: Aaron Wiesen, Civil Engineer
Reviewed by: Debra Heiser, Engineering Director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 4a) Page 2
Title: TS No. 650: Authorize Installation of “No Parking” Restrictions West of Toledo Ave on 26th St
RESOLUTION NO. 15-____
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING INSTALLATION OF
“NO PARKING” - RESTRICTIONS WEST OF TOLEDO
AVENUE ON 26TH STREET
TRAFFIC STUDY NO. 650
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation will be monitoring storm
water levels during the Highway 100 reconstruction project. The installation of ‘No Parking”
restrictions will also allow improved mobility of public works staff vehicles for snow removal
and storage as well as maintenance of City lighting systems, and;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis
Park, Minnesota, that:
1. The Engineering Director is hereby authorized to install ‘No Parking” restrictions west of
Toledo Avenue on 26th Street.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council March 16, 2015
City Manager
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 4a) Page 3
Title: TS No. 650: Authorize Installation of “No Parking” Restrictions West of Toledo Ave on 26th St
TRAFFIC STUDY NO. 650
TOLEDO AVE FIGURE
(NO PARKING)
Proposed
NO PARKING
Area
N
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: March 16, 2015
Consent Agenda Item: 4b
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Second Reading – Ordinance to Rezone Meadowbrook Golf Course
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to approve the Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance
rezoning Meadowbrook Golf Course from R-1 Single Family Residential District to Park and
Open Space District and authorize summary publication.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council support the rezoning of Meadowbrook
Golf Course to be consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan land use designation?
SUMMARY: This Ordinance is prompted by the City’s desire to be consistent with the 2030
Comprehensive Plan, preserve recreational amenities for residents, and preserve areas of
valuable environmental quality. The City’s 2030 Comprehensive Plan guides both parcels as a
Park and Open Space Land Use; therefore rezoning the two parcels of Meadowbrook Golf
Course in St. Louis Park, maintains consistency with the Comprehensive Plan.
In 2006, the Park and Open Space District was implemented. The purpose of this district is to
preserve recreational amenities and areas with environmentally valuable qualities. At that time,
city-owned properties were rezoned to POS District. Currently, the City has reviewed several
publically-owned properties and has identified Meadowbrook Golf Course to move forward with
the rezoning process.
On February 4, 2015, the Planning Commission held a Public Hearing for the rezoning of
Meadowbrook Golf Course. At the meeting, there was no one in attendance for the hearing and
the Planning Commission voted 6-0 to recommend the rezoning to the City Council. On March
2, 2015, the City Council passed the First Reading of the Ordinance for the rezoning.
Next Step: The Ordinance will be effective on April 10th, 2015.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a leader in environmental
stewardship. We will increase environmental consciousness and responsibility in all areas of city
business.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance
Summary Ordinance for Publication
Prepared by: Alex Boyce, Community Development Intern
Reviewed by: Meg McMonigal, Planning and Zoning Supervisor
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 4b) Page 2
Title: Second Reading – Ordinance to Rezone Meadowbrook Golf Course
ORDINANCE NO.____-15
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ST. LOUIS PARK ORDINANCE CODE
CHANGING BOUNDARIES OF ZONING DISTRICTS
MEADOWBROOK GOLF COURSE
THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK DOES ORDAIN:
Section 1. The City Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the
Planning Commission (Case No. 15-01-Z).
Section 2. The St. Louis Park Zoning Ordinance adopted December 28, 1959,
Ordinance No. 730; amended December 31, 1992, Ordinance No. 1902-93, amended December
17, 2001, Ordinance No. 2216-01, as heretofore amended, is hereby further amended by
changing the zoning district boundaries by reclassifying the following described lands from their
existing land use district classification to the new land use district classification as indicated for
the tract as hereinafter set forth, to wit:
That part of Meadowbrook Golf Course embraced within that part of the North 1/2 of the
Southeast 1/4 of Section 20, Township 117, Range 21 lying southerly of the centerline of
Excelsior Road and that part of the South 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 20,
Township 117, Range 21, Hennepin County, Minnesota shall be rezoned from R-1
Single-Family Residential District to Park and Open Space District (POS).
Section 3. The contents of Planning Case File 15-01-Z are hereby entered into and
made part of the public hearing record and the record of decision for this case.
Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect fifteen days after its publication.
Public Hearing February 4, 2015
First Reading March 2, 2015
Second Reading March 16, 2015
Date of Publication March 26, 2015
Date Ordinance takes effect April 10, 2015
Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council March 16, 2015
City Manager Mayor
Attest: Approved as to Form and Execution:
City Clerk City Attorney
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 4b) Page 3
Title: Second Reading – Ordinance to Rezone Meadowbrook Golf Course
SUMMARY
ORDINANCE NO.____-15
AN ORDINANCE REZONING
MEADOWBROOK GOLF COURSE
This ordinance states that Meadowbrook Golf Course shall be rezoned from R-1 Single-Family
Residential District to Park and Open Space District (POS).
This ordinance shall take effect 15 days after publication.
Adopted by the City Council March 16, 2015
Jeffrey W. Jacobs /s/
Mayor
A copy of the full text of this ordinance is available for inspection with the City Clerk.
Published in St. Louis Park Sailor: March 26, 2015
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: March 16, 2015
Consent Agenda Item: 4c
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Accept Grant from Metropolitan Council for Wolfe Park/The Rec Center Soils
Exploration
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution approving acceptance of a
Metropolitan Livable Communities Act Grant from the Metropolitan Council in the amount of
$50,000 for the exploration of soils in Wolfe Park/The Rec Center.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish to accept the grant with restrictions
on its use?
SUMMARY: The Metropolitan Council has awarded to the City of St. Louis Park/Operations
and Recreation Department a grant in the amount of $50,000. The grant is given for an
environmental assessment update (additional soils testing) and development of a Response
Action Plan (RAP) in Wolfe Park/The Rec Center located at 3700 Monterey Drive.
The City will be using the funds to further explore the soils on the west and south side of The
Rec Center. Even though the city is not building the Community Center at this time, we will be
doing soils exploration. This information can be used in the future if or when discussions
continue regarding the Community Center. An emphasis will be placed on soil testing on the
west side of The Rec Center, in the area where the outdoor sheet of ice/multi-use complex is
proposed to be placed. Testing will include additional borings, test pits, and vapor testing.
Soil testing is expected to be completed by early June 2015.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: This grant will be used for consulting
services and testing of soils in Wolfe Park/The Rec Center, along with develop a Response
Action Plan (RAP).
VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution
Prepared by: Stacy M. Voelker, Administrative Secretary
Jason T. West, Recreation Superintendent
Reviewed by: Cindy Walsh, Director of Operations & Recreation
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 4c) Page 2
Title: Accept Grant from Metropolitan Council for Wolfe Park/The Rec Center Soils Exploration
RESOLUTION NO. 15-____
RESOLUTION IDENTIFYING THE NEED FOR TAX BASE REVITALIZATION
ACCOUNT FUNDING AND AUTHORIZING AN APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS
IN THE AMOUNT OF $50,000 FOR THE EXPLORATION OF SOILS
IN WOLFE PARK / THE REC CENTER
WHEREAS the City of St. Louis Park is a participant in the Livable Communities Act’s
Housing Incentives Program for 2014 as determined by the Metropolitan Council, and is
therefore eligible to apply for Tax Base Revitalization Account (TBRA) funds; and
WHEREAS the City has identified a proposed project within the City that meets the
purposes and criteria of the TBRA and is consistent with and promotes the purposes of the
Metropolitan Livable Communities Act and the policies of the Metropolitan Council’s adopted
metropolitan development guide; and
WHEREAS the City has the institutional, managerial and financial capability to ensure
adequate project administration; and
WHEREAS the City certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws and regulations
as stated in the grant agreement; and
WHEREAS the City agrees to act as legal sponsor for the project contained in the grant
application submitted on November 1, 2014; and
WHEREAS only a limited amount of grant funding is available through the Metropolitan
Council’s TBRA during each funding cycle and the Metropolitan Council has determined it is
appropriate to allocate those scarce grant funds only to eligible projects that would not occur
without the availability of TBRA grant funding.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that, after appropriate examination and due
consideration, the governing body of the City:
1. Finds that it is in the best interests of the City’s development goals and priorities for the
proposed project to occur at this particular site and at this particular time.
2. Finds that the project component(s) for which TBRA funding is sought:
(a) will not occur solely through private or other public investment within the
reasonably foreseeable future; and
(b) will occur within three years after a grant award only if Livable Communities
Demonstration Account funding is made available for this project at this time.
3. Represents that the City has undertaken reasonable and good faith efforts to procure
funding for the project component for which TBRA funding is sought but was not able to
find or secure from other sources funding that is necessary for project component
completion within three years.
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 4c) Page 3
Title: Accept Grant from Metropolitan Council for Wolfe Park/The Rec Center Soils Exploration
4. Authorizes Jason T. West, its Recreation Superintendent, to submit on behalf of the City
an agreement for Metropolitan Council TBRA grant funds for the project component(s)
identified in the application, and to execute such agreements as may be necessary to
implement the project on behalf of the City.
Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council March 16, 2015
Tom Harmening, City Manager Jeff Jacobs, Mayor
Attest:
Nancy Stroth, City Clerk
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: March 16, 2015
Consent Agenda Item: 4d
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Cooperative Agreement with Hennepin County for Furthering Goals of the SWLRT
Community Works Program
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to approve an Agreement between the City and
Hennepin County to agree to work together to further the goals of the Southwest Corridor
Investment Framework.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish to put in place a formal agreement
with Hennepin County to work together to accomplish the goals and future projects identified in
the in the Community Works planning process and in the Southwest Corridor Investment
Framework (originally titled Transitional Station Area Action Plans – TSAAP)?
SUMMARY: An Agreement to work with Hennepin County is attached for consideration. The
intent of the agreement is to provide a cooperative arrangement with the County to work together
in the future on a wide variety of Community Works projects. The agreement has been reviewed
by the City Attorney. The agreement can be terminated by either party on 30 days notice.
In 2012-2014 the Hennepin County’s Community Works program for SWLRT created
Southwest Corridor Investment Framework (originally titled Transitional Station Area Action
Plans – TSAAP. This planning process identified a number of improvements for the corridor,
both for opening day and for the longer term. Community Works partners have also worked
together on a number of other initiatives including housing, employment and marketing.
This agreement sets up the opportunity for the County and City to work together toward
accomplishing improvements and projects in the corridor that have been and will continue to be
identified. At this time, no particular projects are a part of this agreement; any future projects
would be specified in an amendment to the agreement and would be brought back to the City
Council for approval.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: None at this time. This agreement
provides a framework for cooperation for funding in the future as specific projects are brought
forth.
VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged
community.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Cooperative Agreement
Prepared by: Meg McMonigal, Planning and Zoning Supervisor
Reviewed by: Michele Schnitker, Interim Community Development Director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 4d) Page 2
Title: Cooperative Agreement w/ Hennepin Co. for Furthering Goals of SWLRT Community Works Program
Hennepin County Contract No. A140646
City of St. Louis Park _____________
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE HENNEPIN COUNTY HOUSING
AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK
This Agreement is between the County of Hennepin Housing and Redevelopment
Authority, State of Minnesota (“HCHRA”), 701 Fourth Avenue South, Suite 400, Minneapolis,
MN 55415, and the City of St. Louis Park (“CITY”), 5005 Minnetonka Blvd, St. Louis Park, MN
55416.
WHEREAS, the HCHRA and the CITY have each approved the Southwest Corridor
Investment Framework (“Framework”) dated December 2013 through respective resolutions
Hennepin County Resolution 14-0490, and City of St. Louis Park Resolution 14- 060 dated April
21, 2014; and
WHEREAS, the HCHRA and the CITY agree that there are financial and strategic
benefits of working together to further the goals of the Framework (“Goals”) and wish to
document that understanding in a cooperative agreement; and
WHEREAS, the HCHRA and the CITY plan to develop one or more projects (“Project
or Projects”) to further the Goals; and
WHEREAS, a cooperative agreement and future Projects fit within the criteria of a
multijurisdictional reinvestment program authorized under Minnesota Statutes §383B.79; and
WHEREAS, the HCHRA and CITY have the authority to participate in a cooperative
agreement and Project pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §§383B.79 and 469.001 to 469.047 and
other applicable law; and
WHEREAS, the COUNTY and the CITY have the authority to contribute to a Project
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §§383B.79 and 469.041 and other applicable law, and
THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:
1. Furtherance of Goals. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 383B.79, the HCHRA and
CITY enter into this cooperative agreement, and agree to work with each other to further
the goals of the Framework by attempting to develop one or more Projects subject to the
following requirements:
a. That the CITY retains its jurisdiction over all issues of local concern relating to
zoning, land usage, building code requirements and compliance with all
applicable city codes and ordinances.
b. That the full faith and credit of the CITY will not be pledged as a source of
payment or repayment of said Project financial obligations owed by Hennepin
County and/or the HCHRA.
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 4d) Page 3
Title: Cooperative Agreement w/ Hennepin Co. for Furthering Goals of SWLRT Community Works Program
This agreement shall commence on March 16, 2015 and expire on December 31, 2020.
2. Future Projects. The details of any Project or Projects developed pursuant to this
Agreement shall be described in an amendment to this Agreement and approved by each
of the parties.
3. Funds from Hennepin County to the HCHRA. Hennepin County may contribute funds to
the HCHRA to be disbursed by the HCHRA for any Project.
4. Merger and Modification.
a. The entire Agreement between the parties is contained in this Agreement and
supersedes all oral agreements between the parties relating to the subject matter.
All items that are referenced or that are attached are incorporated and made a part
of this Agreement. If there is any conflict between the terms of this Agreement
and referenced or attached items, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail.
b. Any alterations, variations, modifications, or waivers of provisions of this
Agreement shall only be valid when they have been reduced to writing as an
amendment to this Agreement and signed by the parties.
5. Contract Administration. In order to coordinate the services of the City [and Other
Entity] with the activities of the HCHRA so as to accomplish the purposes of this
Agreement, Catherine Walker, or [his/her] successor, shall manage this Agreement on
behalf of the HCHRA and serve as liaison between the HCHRA and the City. Kevin
Locke or his designee shall manage this Agreement on behalf of the City.
6. Notices. Any notice or demand which must be given or made by a party under this
Agreement or any statute or ordinance shall be in writing, and shall be sent registered or
certified mail. Notices to the HCHRA shall be sent to the Deputy Executive Director at
the address stated in the opening paragraph of the Agreement. Notice to the City [and
Other Entity] shall be sent to the address stated in the opening paragraph of the
Agreement.
7. Audits. The books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices of the
each party relevant to this agreement are subject to examination by the any party and
either Legislative Auditor or the State Auditor for a period of six years after the effective
date of this Agreement.
8. Termination. Any party may withdraw from this Agreement upon 30 days’ notice given
in writing pursuant to Section 6 hereof, provided however if a party has entered into an
amendment relating to future projects under Section 2 hereof, the right to withdraw shall
be subject to the terms of said amendment.
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 4d) Page 4
Title: Cooperative Agreement w/ Hennepin Co. for Furthering Goals of SWLRT Community Works Program
HCHRA BOARD APPROVAL
HENNEPIN COUNTY HOUSING AND
REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Reviewed by the County
Attorney's Office By:_______________________________
Chair of its Board
By:___________________________
Date: _______________________ _ Date: ____ _________________________
And: ______________________________
Executive Director
Date: ______________________________
CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK
By: ________________________________
Its: Mayor
Date: ______________________________
By: ________________________________
Its: City Manager
Date: ______________________________
Attest:
____________________________________
City Clerk
(seal)
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: March 16, 2015
Consent Agenda Item: 4e
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Resolution Supporting Early Voting Legislation
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution in Support of Legislation
Establishing an Early Voting Process for voters in Minnesota.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish to adopt the attached resolution in
support of an early voting process in the State of Minnesota?
BACKGROUND: Minnesota currently allows no-excuse absentee voting by mail and in person.
Under this system, voters may cast ballots as early as 46 days before Election Day by visiting
City Hall. Those ballots are then set aside in sealed envelopes, stored, and left unprocessed until
seven days prior to Election Day. During the 2014 mid-term election, shortly after this no-
excuse absentee voting system was put into place, cities incurred significant administrative costs
by having to operate city halls as a polling place for six-plus weeks prior to Election Day. The
absentee voting paperwork and administrative procedures required by absentee voting did not
change despite the increased volume of in person absentee voters.
Amending the statute to authorize an early voting system would provide an improved and more
efficient process for voters, election judges, and election staff. Implementation of an actual early
voting system for in person voters to cast ballots would eliminate many administrative costs
associated with the current no-excuse absentee system. The legislation will make the voter’s
early voting experience almost identical to voting on Election Day in the precinct. The integrity
of the election process is assured by allowing the voter to know immediately if their ballot has
been accepted by the ballot counting machine, which provides the opportunity for voters to
correct any ballot errors.
This legislation would improve the voting process for absentee voters by making it easier to
understand. Voter confidence would be increased since procedures are similar to Election Day
voting, and the process would be streamlined by reducing paperwork.
The League of Minnesota Cities is in support of establishing a true early voting system, and the
League’s Board of Directors adopted this issue as one of its 2015 legislative priorities. The bill
(SF 414) would establish early voting 15 days prior to Election Day through 5 p.m. on the third
day before the election. Pending certification of statewide systems and voting equipment to
administer early voting by the Secretary of State, the law would be effective for elections held on
or after August 1, 2015.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Early voting is a cost-effective process that
makes good fiscal sense for city governments and local property tax payers.
VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution
Prepared by: Nancy Stroth, City Clerk
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 4e ) Page 2
Title: Resolution Supporting Early Voting Legislation
CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK
RESOLUTION NO. 15-____
A RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION ESTABLISHING
AN EARLY VOTING PROCESS FOR VOTERS IN MINNESOTA
WHEREAS, Minnesota law currently provides for no-excuse absentee voting by mail
and in-person; and
WHEREAS, with in-person absentee voting, the voter must place their voted ballot in a
series of envelopes that is processed at a later date by election officials; and
WHEREAS, early voting would allow a voter to place their voted ballot directly into the
ballot tabulator, thereby reducing the risk of voter errors and reducing the administrative costs
involved with in-person absentee voting; and
WHEREAS, a process will still be provided for voters to request and submit an absentee
ballot by mail;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of St.
Louis Park hereby supports legislation establishing an early voting process for the voters in the
State of Minnesota;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that by establishing an early voting process, taxpayer
dollars will be saved and a better service will be provided to Minnesota voters.
Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council March 16, 2015
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: March 16, 2015
Minutes: 4f
OFFICIAL MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
FEBRUARY 4, 2015 – 6:00 p.m.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MEMBERS PRESENT: Claudia Johnston-Madison, Robert Kramer, Lisa Peilen, Richard
Person, Carl Robertson, Joe Tatalovich
MEMBERS ABSENT: Lynne C arper
STAFF PRESENT: Sean Walther, Alex Boyce, Nancy Sells
1. Call to Order – Roll Call
2. Approval of Minutes of January 21, 2015
Commissioner Robertson moved approval of the minutes. Commissioner Johnston-
Madison seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 4-0-2 (Kramer and
Person abstained).
3. Public Hearings
A. Major amendment to Planned Unit Development – Methodist Hospital
Location: 6500 Excelsior Boulevard
Applicant: Park Nicollet Methodist Hospital
Case No.: 14-31-PUD
Sean Walther, Senior Planner, presented the staff report. Additions to the east and west
towers of the hospital are proposed for patient room modernization, surgery
expansion/renovation, and a small link addition above the Cancer Center.
Mr. Walther spoke about Park Nicollet’s 2003 Master Plan for future expansions of the
hospital campus. That plan included an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW)
worksheet. The proposed major amendment is a portion of Phase II improvements.
Mr. Walther discussed building height variables for the west and east additions. He
explained the proposed PUD modification necessary for a portion of the east addition.
Commissioner Robertson asked about neighborhood concerns.
Mr. Walther spoke about the list of issues and resolutions, included in the staff report,
that have been laid out in two neighborhood meetings. He noted there have not been any
strong concerns about the proposal. There have been some requests for additional views
of the property. He said most of the remaining concerns are on-going regarding
construction.
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 4f) Page 2
Title: Planning Commission Meeting Minutes February 4, 2015
Commissioner Kramer asked about any effects on light rail with any of the hospital
construction.
Bob Riesselman, Engineering Director, Park Nicollet Health Services, responded that
future light rail will be several blocks north of the hospital and is independent of the
proposed hospital construction.
Chair Person opened the public hearing. As no one was present wishing to speak, he
closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Robertson said it is an exciting project. The only concerns are with the
neighbors and over the years the hospital has shown great resolve in working with issues.
Commissioner Johnston-Madison made a motion recommending approval of a Major
Amendment to the PUD for the Methodist Hospital Campus. Commissioner Robertson
seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 6-0.
B. Rezoning to POS Park and Open Space
Location: Meadowbrook Golf Course
Applicant: City of St. Louis Park
Case No.: 15-01-Z
Alex Boyce, Community Development Intern, presented the staff report. The rezoning of
the golf course from R-1 Single Family Residential to Park and Open Space (POS) would
be consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan and the current use of the property.
Mr. Boyce stated the owner of the golf course, Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board
(MPRB), supports the rezoning as long as the current use is not in violation of the POS
District, and if the property ceases to be used as a golf course other open space and
recreational uses can be continued on the site.
Commissioner Peilen spoke about recent closings of several golf courses in the metro
area. She asked if there are any plans if the Meadowbrook site was no longer viable as a
golf course.
Mr. Boyce responded that he doesn’t believe there are any plans if that were to happen,
but the site would remain as recreational or open space use under the POS district.
Commissioner Johnston-Madison asked if only the St. Louis Park portion of the golf
course is located in the FEMA Floodplain, making it undevelopable.
Mr. Boyce stated the floodplain extends somewhat beyond the city boundary.
Chair Person opened the public hearing. As no one was present wishing to speak he
closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Robertson made a motion recommending approval of the rezoning of
Meadowbrook Golf Course from R-1 Single-Family Residential District to Park and
Open Space District (POS). Commissioner Peilen seconded the motion, and the motion
passed on a vote of 6-0.
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 4f) Page 3
Title: Planning Commission Meeting Minutes February 4, 2015
C. Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments - Planned Unit Developments
Applicant: City of St. Louis Park
Case No.: 14-32-CP
Sean Walther, Senior Planner, presented the staff report. He noted that recently the City
revised the planned unit development (PUD) section of the Zoning Code. Similar
amendments are now needed in the Comprehensive Plan to fully accomplish the policies
intended with that PUD ordinance. Mr. Walther stated that the Comprehensive Plan text
amendments specifically remove density limitations associated with the PUD process in
the Land Use Plan and Plan Implementation chapters.
Commissioner Johnston-Madison remarked that the table in Plan Implementation, which
is proposed to be removed, has been useful. She asked if there are any plans to replace
the table to reflect the new PUD policies.
Mr. Walther said it’s a little odd to be providing zoning code information in the
Comprehensive Plan. He said in general the Comprehensive Plan sets policy goals and
the Zoning Code controls more specifically. Mr. Walther said staff could look into
placing a table elsewhere in the plan that would summarize the Comprehensive Plan
categories which would lay out density restrictions.
Chair Person opened the public hearing. No one was present wishing to speak and the
Chair closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Johnston-Madison made a motion to recommend approval of the
Comprehensive Plan amendments relating to Planned Unit Developments. Commissioner
Robertson seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 6-0.
4. Other Business
5. Communications
6. Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 6:40 p.m.
Submitted by,
Nancy Sells
Administrative Secretary
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: March 16, 2015
Minutes: 4g
MINUTES
ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY COMMISSION: SUSTAINABLE SLP
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
February 4, 2015
Community Room, City Hall
MEMBERS PRESENT: Terry Gips, Rachel Harris, Tom Hillstrom, Cindy Larson O’Neil, Alex
Sundvall, Judy Voigt, Chris Anderson, Nancy Rose and Rene McGarvey
EXCUSED ABSENCE: Karen Laumb and Mark Eilers
STAFF PRESENT: Phillip Elkin and Tom Harmening
1. The meeting was called to order at 6:31 p.m.
2. The minutes of the January 7, 2015 meeting were approved as amended.
3. Guest Presenter – Tom Harmening, City Manager for St. Louis Park, was a guest
speaker to address the commissioners about the City’s desire to hire a Sustainability
Coordinator as a new full time position. After a brief introduction, he described the
history of the sustainability effort from an administrative viewpoint and the City
Council’s goals for the commission and position. Concluding his presentation Tom
agreed to send each of the commissioners a copy of the job description for comments.
4. Election of Officers – Rachel Harris began the discussion thanking each of the
commissioners for the opportunity to be the chairperson in the past year and what an
honor it had been. After discussion, Terry Gips was nominated by Chris Anderson
(seconded by Ryan Griffin) and unanimously elected. Judy Voigt nominated Rachel
Harris to the position of Vice Chairperson (Chris Anderson seconded) and also was voted
to the position unanimously.
5. 2015 Goals and Commission Vision Statement Each of the workgroups had submitted
their 2015 goals for inclusion in the annual report to council. Since each report was
developed independently, the format and length varied significantly. The focus of
discussion was the need to create uniformity in the report and consolidate some of the
content. The discussion ended with the agreement to format the submittal as a memo with
a short description of 2015 goals and the individual workgroup reports attached as an
appendix to the report.
6. Annual Report to Council According to the ESC (Environment and Sustainability
Commission) by-laws, the commission is required to submit an annual report of the
previous year’s activities by April 1. Commissioner Gips asked if there would be time for
individual commission members to address the council as part of this report. He added
that he would like time set aside for all the commissioners who were interested to address
the Council. Last year a representative from each workgroup was given a few minutes to
discuss their progress. Commissioner O’Neil suggested setting up a Google.doc site so
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 4g) Page 2
Title: Environment and Sustainability Commission: Sustainable SLP Meeting Minutes of February 4, 2015
that a working document could be started that all commissioners could add comments. It
was agreed that this document should add goals to, complete the vision statement and
engage the community at large. Specifically, get more community members involved in
work groups. 2015 Workgroups are: GreenStep Cities, Environmentally Preferred
Purchasing Policy, Communications, Water, Land and Wildlife and Education and
Action.
7. Work Group Updates
a. Green Step Cities- No update
b. Environmental Preferred Purchasing Policy- Discussions with Staff led to
amendments to the language which should be completed in February.
c. Communications- Commissioner Voigt volunteered to take over leadership of the
group.
d. Water, Land and Wildlife- Two meetings to date, with guest speakers from
engineering and operations. Continuing to narrow in on goals.
e. Education and Action- Continued work on writing/editing community survey.
8. The meeting adjourned at 8:07
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: March 16, 2015
Action Agenda Item: 8a
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: 2015 Connect the Park! Projects
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt the following Resolutions:
• Resolution accepting the project report for Project No. 4015-2000, approving plans and
specifications and authorizing advertisement for bids for segments A-E (Pavement
Management project segments).
• Resolution accepting the project report for Project No. 4015-2000, approving plans and
specifications and authorizing advertisement for bids for segments F-I (MSA segments).
• Resolution accepting the project report for Project No. 4015-2000, approving plans and
specifications and authorizing advertisement for bids for segments J-R (Connect the Park
project segments).
POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish staff to continue to pursue the
installation of the proposed 2015 sidewalk, trail, and bikeway segments?
SUMMARY: Public comment was accepted at the March 2, 2015 Council meeting. At that
meeting twenty two individuals commented on the Connect the Park! 2015 proposal.
Connect the Park! is the city's 10-year Capital Improvement Plan to add additional sidewalks,
trails, and bikeways throughout the community. This initiative proposes to build 10 miles of
sidewalk, 3 miles of trail, 3 bridges, and 32 miles of bikeways. As part of Vision St. Louis Park
in 2007, the city worked with community members to create an Active Living Sidewalks and
Trails plan. The Connect the Park! initiative will work toward implementing many of the
elements of the plan between now and 2023.
The primary goal of Connect the Park! is to develop a comprehensive, city-wide system of
sidewalks, trails, and bikeways that provides local and regional connectivity, improves safety
and accessibility, and enhances overall community livability. This is achieved by creating a
system plan that provides sidewalks approximately every ¼-mile and bikeways every ½-mile in
order to improve pedestrian and bicycle connectivity throughout the community.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The construction cost estimate for the 2015
projects is estimated at $1,852,500. The original estimated cost for implementing the entire 10
year plan was $17 - 24 million dollars. These improvements will be funded using General
Obligation bonds.
VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged
community.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion
Resolution for Pavement Management Segments
Resolution for MSA Segments
Resolution for Connect the Park! Segments
Prepared by: Jack Sullivan, Senior Engineering Project Manager
Reviewed by: Debra Heiser, Engineering Director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 8a) Page 2
Title: 2015 Connect the Park! Projects
DISCUSSION
BACKGROUND: The Connect the Park! Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) was approved by
Council in June of 2013. In 2014, the CIP was modified in order to take advantage of some of
the other projects already identified in the City’s CIP and minimize construction scheduling
impacts from other transportation projects proposed by Hennepin County, MnDOT and
Southwest LRT. The proposed segments and associated build year for this plan can be found in
the attached graphics.
PROPOSED 2015 CONNECT THE PARK! SEGMENTS
In total, seventeen sidewalk and trail segments are recommended for construction in 2015. This
equates to over 11,750 feet (2.2 miles) of new sidewalks and 4250 feet (0.8 miles) of trails.
This is the second construction season for the plan. Staff has utilized the last nine months to
engage the public in the design process.
A Connect the Park! communication plan was created with the help of the City’s
communications department that included a website “connectthepark.org”, an action plan for
resident engagement that includes open houses, social media, and the use of email to share
information about the project as well as receive feedback.
Open houses were held in late November and early December, 2014 as an opportunity for
residents to learn more about the proposed 2015 sidewalk segments and to gain insight on the
right of way directly in front of their house. The initial round of open houses lumped
geographically similar segments together for a general discussion about sidewalk along their
roadway. The preliminary plan showed a 6 foot wide sidewalk with a 5 to 7 foot wide grass
boulevard behind the curb. This cross section was consistent with the sidewalk design included
in the Connect the Park! plan.
Staff presented to the residents the following design criteria that we would use to evaluate the
feasibility of constructing sidewalk.
• Minimize impacts to city boulevards
• Minimize tree impacts
• Driveway grades
• Driveway lengths
• Maintain a minimum of one side on street parking
• Distance from proposed sidewalk to homes
• Location of private utilities that occupy the boulevards (electric, gas, communications)
Other items discussed
• Staff discussed the Right of Way policy for addressing private amenities in the public
right of way.
• Snow removal
• Sidewalk replacement
• Funding
The goal of the first meeting was to educate the residents on the process and gain feedback on
their concerns and issues related to the proposed sidewalk. Many residents asked questions,
wrote post it notes on the layouts and provided suggestions for modifications to this base design.
Staff tried to incorporate these comments into a refined design
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 8a) Page 3
Title: 2015 Connect the Park! Projects
The following are the key issues staff heard in this initial round of open houses:
• Concern about impacts to trees and other vegetation in the boulevard
• Close proximity of the sidewalk to the house
• Shortening driveway lengths
• Sidewalks were not needed
If property owners were unable to attend the meetings, or if they had specific concerns that they
wanted to walk through, staff met with them on site. Using the information gathered from the
first round of open houses, individual site visits, phone calls and emails, staff revised the
sidewalk design to try to minimize the number of impacts within the boulevards. When impacts
could not be avoided, staff proposed mitigation of the impacts.
Engineering staff worked closely with Operations and Recreation staff to ensure the network of
sidewalk being built would meet the objectives for tree preservation/ replanting and acceptable
widths and design features for snow removal on community sidewalk segments.
Staff also worked closely with Operations and Recreation, Police and Fire to understand
appropriate street widths for efficient snow removal and safe travel for emergency response
vehicles.
The following pages of the summary discuss the design modifications staff used to minimize the
impacts to the property owners along these sidewalk segments.
The proposed final design plans were presented to residents at a second round of open house
meetings in January and February 2015. These meetings were held in a similar format to the first
round were residents were able to ask questions and staff asked for their feedback. Staff shared
with the residents the next steps in the process and informed them of opportunities to contact
staff and Council members, the upcoming study session and future Council reports prior to start
of construction.
ADDITIONAL COMMUNICATION: Staff has received a limited amount of communication
from residents, neighborhood groups and businesses expressing their feedback on the proposed
sidewalk segments during our public process and
Staff has included correspondence from residents with this Council report.
SIDEWALK SEGMENTS
Flag Avenue, 18th Street, Hillsboro Avenue and 14th Street
Segments “a”, “b”, “c”, “d” and “e” in the attached resolution
Segment Overview: Approximately half of this sidewalk (north of 16th Street) is planned
to be constructed in conjunction with the 2015 Pavement Management project. The
remainder of the sidewalk south of 16th street is adjacent to streets the City will not be
reconstructing this year.
Community Significance: This area of town is currently underserved by pedestrian
facilities. The installation of sidewalk on these streets will connect the sidewalk along
Flag Avenue to Wayzata Boulevard.
Public Process: Staff has held two public open houses and on-site meetings with
residents to discuss issues and concerns.
Design: The construction of a five foot wide concrete sidewalk with a variable width
boulevard (4-6 feet) along the east side of Flag Avenue north of the Minneapolis Golf
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 8a) Page 4
Title: 2015 Connect the Park! Projects
Club and the north side of 18th Street. At the intersection of Hillsboro Avenue and 18th
Street the sidewalk switches to the west side of the roadway as it heads north to 14th
street. The sidewalk continues on the south side of 14th Street from Flag Avenue to the
Frontage Road of TH 169. The walk continues north along the west side of the Frontage
Road to Wayzata Boulevard. There are a number of trees that will need to be removed
along Hillsboro Avenue between 18th Street and 14th Street. The City is proposing to
narrow the street from 30 feet to 28 feet to minimize tree impacts and driveway grades
where feasible.
Walk Type: This is proposed to be a community sidewalk and would be maintained by
the City for snow removal.
Cost: The engineering cost estimate for the 3,600 feet of sidewalk is $241,500.
Construction Schedule: This sidewalk segment is planned to be built in conjunction
with the Pavement Management street reconstruction project scheduled to be completed
in the summer of 2015
Segments Around Louisiana Oaks Park
There are three segments of sidewalk and/or trail that “ring” Louisiana Oaks Park and the former
Reilly Tar & Chemical Site. The City is required to complete additional permitting in order to
complete any excavation near the site. The timing of the permitting necessitated postponing
these segments until the 2015 construction season. This aligns well with the 2015 Municipal
State Aid road project proposed for Walker St, the completion of the Highway 7/ Louisiana
interchange project and the improvements programmed for Louisiana Oaks Park. These
segments are discussed in more detail in the following pages of the report:
1. Louisiana Avenue Trail (From Walker Street to 32nd Street)
2. 32nd Street Trail (Pennsylvania Ave to Oregon Ave)
3. Walker Street Sidewalk (Texas Ave to 37th St) and Walker Street Trail (Adjacent to
Louisiana Oaks Park)
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 8a) Page 5
Title: 2015 Connect the Park! Projects
1. Louisiana Avenue Trail (From Walker Street to 32nd Street)
Segment “f” in the attached resolution
Segment Overview: This segment is currently has a 5 foot wide concrete sidewalk on the
west side of the roadway. The sidewalk will be replaced by an 8 or 10 foot wide asphalt
trail. This will continue the wider multi-use trail that was built in 2014 from Oxford
Street up to Walker Street.
Community Significance: This trail creates a direct connection to the Three Rivers
Regional trail and future SWLRT station.
Public Process: Staff held a public meeting in 2013 and two more public open houses in
late 2014/early 2015 with residents to discuss issues and concerns.
Design: The construction of a 10 foot wide asphalt trail with a variable width boulevard
(4-6 feet) along the west side of Louisiana Avenue from 36th Street to the pedestrian
bridge over Louisiana Avenue. North of the pedestrian bridge the trail will narrow to 8
foot wide to minimize tree impacts. Staff is proposing to reconstruct the approach to the
pedestrian bridge and the trail entrance in to Louisiana Oaks Park.
Walk Type: This is proposed to be a community trail and would be maintained by the
City for snow removal.
Cost: The engineering cost estimate for the 2,900 feet of trail is $550,000.
Construction Schedule: This trail segment is planned to be built in conjunction with the
Walker/ 36th Street 2015 Municipal State Aid reconstruction project scheduled to be
completed in the summer of 2015.
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 8a) Page 6
Title: 2015 Connect the Park! Projects
2. 32nd Street Trail (Between Pennsylvania Avenue and Oregon Avenue)
Segment “g” in the attached resolution
Segment Overview: This segment is a gap in the trail network that wraps around
Louisiana Oaks Park. Currently there is a dirt path within the City’s 32nd Street right of
way.
Community Significance: This trail completes a gap in the Louisiana Oaks Park trail
system that will create a continuous walking and biking loop around the park.
Public Process: Staff has held a public meeting in 2013 and two more public open
houses in late 2014/early 2015 with residents to discuss issues and concerns.
Design: The construction of a 10 foot wide asphalt trail that connects the trail network
currently in place around Louisiana Oaks Park. This area is currently heavily wooded.
Staff has worked with the City Forester to minimize tree impacts.
Walk Type: This is proposed to be a community trail and would be maintained by the
City for snow removal.
Cost: The engineering cost estimate for the 350 feet of trail is $55,000.
Construction Schedule: This trail segment is planned to be built in conjunction with the
Walker/ 36th Street 2015 Municipal State Aid reconstruction project scheduled to be
completed in the summer of 2015.
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 8a) Page 7
Title: 2015 Connect the Park! Projects
3. Walker Street Sidewalk (Texas Ave to 37th St) and Walker Street Trail (Adjacent to
Louisiana Oaks Park)
Segments “h” and “i” in the attached resolution
Segment Overview: Although Walker Street has a substantial amount of sidewalk and
trails, many of the segments are not connected. This creates gaps that pedestrians and
trail users need to manage. Since Walker Street is scheduled for reconstruction in 2015
staff believes this is the right time to create these connections.
Community Significance: The construction of these sidewalk and trail segments fills
gaps in the current pedestrian network between Louisiana Avenue and Texas Avenue.
Both Texas and Louisiana are major north- south routes connecting destinations and the
regional trail system.
Public Process: Staff held a public meeting in 2013 and additional public open houses in
late 2014 with residents to discuss issues and concerns.
Design: Along the north side of Walker Street from the west edge of Louisiana Oaks
Park to Louisiana Avenue an 8 foot wide bituminous trail would be built with a
boulevard that ranges from 6 to 20 feet. A 6 foot wide concrete sidewalk is proposed
along the south side of Walker Avenue from Quebec Avenue to 37th Street and then along
the north side between Texas Avenue and Quebec Avenue. These sidewalks fill in the
gap segments that exist today. As discussed at a recent study session, at the direction of
the City Council the sidewalk width could be reduced to 5 feet.
Walk Type: These are proposed to be a community sidewalk and trail that would be
maintained by the City for snow removal.
Cost: The engineering cost estimate for the 2000 feet of sidewalk and 1000 feet of
asphalt trail is $130,000. Final estimates will be available with the MSA Roadway
Improvement project report on March 16, 2015.
Construction Schedule: This sidewalk and trail segment is planned to be built as part of
the Walker/ 36th Street 2015 Municipal State Aid reconstruction project scheduled to be
completed in the summer of 2015.
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 8a) Page 8
Title: 2015 Connect the Park! Projects
Morningside Road (Wooddale Avenue to Oakdale Avenue (Edina))
Segment “j” in the attached resolution
Segment Overview: This is a short section of roadway between Wooddale Avenue and
the City of Edina that does not have sidewalk on either side.
Community Significance: Connections to Susan Lindgren Elementary School,
Browndale Park, and City of Edina.
Public Process: Staff has held two public open houses and additional on-site meetings
with residents to discuss issues and concerns.
Design: The construction of a five foot wide concrete sidewalk with a variable width
boulevard (4-6 feet) along north side of Morningside Road from Wooddale to Ottawa
Avenue. The segment east of Ottawa Avenue has some steep road and boulevard grades
that will require a retaining wall. This segment of sidewalk is placed at the back of the
curb in order to minimize the wall height.
Walk Type: This is proposed to be a community sidewalk and would be maintained by
the City for snow removal.
Cost: The engineering cost estimate for the 425 feet of sidewalk is $120,000.
Construction Schedule: This is planned to be independent sidewalk construction work
that can be completed in the summer of 2015.
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 8a) Page 9
Title: 2015 Connect the Park! Projects
Quentin Avenue (40th Street to Excelsior Boulevard)
Segment “k” in the attached resolution
Segment Overview: The proposed sidewalk is along the west side of Quentin Avenue
from 40th Street to Excelsior Boulevard. Staff required sidewalk along this section of
property during the recent re-platting of the Park Nicollet/Wells Fargo property on the
southwest corner of Excelsior Boulevard and Quentin Avenue. At the time of platting the
property owners agreed to the sidewalk construction and placed money in escrow to pay
for this segment. The west side of Quentin Avenue will be narrowed from 36 feet to 30
feet from just south of the first drive entrance to Vallacher Street.
Community Significance: Connections to Susan Lindgren Elementary School, Excelsior
& Grand, and the neighborhoods to the south.
Public Process: Staff has held two public open houses and on-site meetings with
residents to discuss issues and concerns.
Design: The construction of a six foot wide concrete sidewalk with a variable width
boulevard (4-6 feet) along the west side of Quentin Avenue.
Walk Type: This is proposed to be a community sidewalk and would be maintained by
the City for snow removal.
Cost: The engineering cost estimate for the 520 feet of sidewalk is $70,000.
Construction Schedule: This is planned to be independent sidewalk construction work
that can be completed in the summer of 2015.
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 8a) Page 10
Title: 2015 Connect the Park! Projects
Texas Avenue (Cedar Lake Road to Franklin Avenue)
Segment “l” in the attached resolution
Segment Overview: A new sidewalk is proposed on the west side of Texas Avenue from
Cedar Lake Road to Franklin Avenue.
Community Significance: Connections to St. Louis Park Middle School, Westwood
Hills Nature Center and the neighborhoods to the west of Texas Avenue.
Public Process: Staff has held two public open houses and numerous on-site meetings
with residents to discuss issues and concerns.
Design: The construction of a six foot wide concrete sidewalk with a variable width
boulevard (4-6 feet) along the west side of Texas Avenue from Cedar Lake Road to
Franklin Avenue. In addition, a pedestrian push button activated crossing light is
proposed at the intersection of Texas Avenue and 22nd Street.
Walk Type: This is proposed to be a community sidewalk and would be maintained by
the City for snow removal.
Cost: The engineering cost estimate for the 2,600 feet of sidewalk is $425,000.
Construction Schedule: This is planned to be independent sidewalk construction work
that can be completed in the summer of 2015.
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 8a) Page 11
Title: 2015 Connect the Park! Projects
ADDITIONAL SIDEWALK SEGMENTS: Council has directed staff to identify gap segments
near a 2015 Connect the Park! sidewalk segment that if completed would create continuous
connections. The following gap sidewalk segments have been investigated by staff and are
feasible for construction.
22nd Street (Texas Avenue to Quebec Drive)
Segment “m” in the attached resolution
Segment Overview: There is an existing user activated pedestrian crossing at the
intersection of Texas and 22nd Street. Currently, 22nd Street does not have a sidewalk in
this segment. With the proposed installation of sidewalk on the west side of Texas the
construction of a 22nd Street sidewalk creates a natural location for pedestrians to cross
Texas Avenue to gain access to the school and the various ball fields east of the school.
Staff is proposing a sidewalk along the north side of 22nd Street to the soccer fields that
will allow pedestrians to safely access the school amenities.
Community Significance: This segment creates a connection to the Middle School and
allows students walking and biking to school to be separated from vehicle traffic.
Public Process: Staff has held two public open houses and met with the School District
to discuss issues and concerns.
Design: The construction of a six foot wide concrete sidewalk with a variable width
boulevard (4-6 feet) along the north side of 22nd Street. The sidewalk would end at the
drive entrance to the school (at Quebec Drive). A future sidewalk could be built along
with the street reconstruction proposed for 2019 that would connect this segment to
Oregon Court/22nd Street.
Walk Type: This is proposed to be a community sidewalk and would be maintained by
the City for snow removal.
Cost: The engineering cost estimate for the 950 feet of sidewalk is $60,000.
Construction Schedule: This is planned to be independent sidewalk construction work
that can be completed in the summer of 2015.
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 8a) Page 12
Title: 2015 Connect the Park! Projects
Glenhurst Avenue (39th Street to 3830 Glenhurst Avenue)
Segment “n” in the attached resolution
Segment Overview: A sidewalk on the west side of Glenhurst Avenue that connects the
existing sidewalk along Glenhurst Avenue to the sidewalk along 39th Street.
Community Significance: Connections to Susan Lindgren Elementary School, Excelsior
and Grand, Minnekahda Vista Park, and the Minneapolis chain of lakes pathway system.
Public Process: Staff has held one public open house and on-site meetings with residents
to discuss issues and concerns.
Design: The construction of a five foot wide concrete sidewalk with a variable width
boulevard (4-6 feet) along the west side of Glenhurst Avenue from 39th Street to 3830
Glenhurst Avenue. This sidewalk will connect in to the 39th Street sidewalk built in
2014. This design requires a number of retaining walls in order to make the grades work
through the front yards of the three homes.
Walk Type: This is proposed to be a neighborhood walk and would be maintained by the
residents for snow removal.
Cost: The engineering cost estimate for the 225 feet of sidewalk is $75,000.
Construction Schedule: This is planned to be independent sidewalk construction work
that can be completed in the summer of 2015.
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 8a) Page 13
Title: 2015 Connect the Park! Projects
Oregon Avenue (32nd Street to 3149 Oregon Avenue)
Segment “o” in the attached resolution
Segment Overview: The current sidewalk along Oregon Avenue stops three lots short of
the Louisiana Oaks Park trail network. This sidewalk segment would complete this gap
and provide a connection to the 32nd Street Trail and other trails to the south.
Community Significance: Connections to the Louisiana Oaks Park complex.
Public Process: Staff has held one public open house with residents to discuss issues and
concerns.
Design: The construction of a five foot wide concrete sidewalk with a variable width
boulevard (4-6 feet) along the east side of Oregon.
Walk Type: This is proposed to be a neighborhood walk and would be maintained by the
residents for snow removal.
Cost: The engineering cost estimate for the 180 feet of sidewalk is $10,000.
Construction Schedule: This sidewalk and trail segment is planned to be built as part of
the Walker/ 36th Street 2015 Municipal State Aid reconstruction project scheduled to be
completed in the summer of 2015.
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 8a) Page 14
Title: 2015 Connect the Park! Projects
Vallacher Avenue (Quentin Avenue to 4915 Vallacher Avenue)
Segment “p” in the attached resolution
Segment Overview: This segment fills a three lot gap in the sidewalk between Quentin
Avenue and Princeton Avenue.
Community Significance: Connections to Susan Lindgren Elementary School, Excelsior
and Grand and the surrounding neighborhoods.
Public Process: Staff has held one public open house with residents to discuss issues and
concerns.
Design: The construction of a five foot wide concrete sidewalk with a variable width
boulevard (4-6 feet) along the south side of Vallacher Avenue from Quentin Avenue to
4915 Vallacher Avenue.
Walk Type: This is proposed to be a neighborhood walk and would be maintained by the
residents for snow removal.
Cost: The engineering cost estimate for the 120 feet of sidewalk is $13,500.
Construction Schedule: This is planned to be independent sidewalk construction work
that can be completed in the summer of 2015.
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 8a) Page 15
Title: 2015 Connect the Park! Projects
40th Street (East of Quentin Avenue to 4001 Quentin Avenue)
Segment “q” in the attached resolution
Segment Overview: This segment fills a one lot gap in the sidewalk between Quentin
Avenue and Princeton Avenue.
Community Significance: Connections to Susan Lindgren Elementary School, Excelsior
and Grand and the surrounding neighborhoods.
Public Process: Staff has held one public open house with residents to discuss issues and
concerns.
Design: The construction of a five foot wide concrete sidewalk with a variable width
boulevard (4-6 feet) along the south side of 40th Street from Quentin Avenue to 4001
Quentin Avenue.
Walk Type: This is proposed to be a neighborhood walk and would be maintained by the
residents for snow removal.
Cost: The engineering cost estimate for the 130 feet of sidewalk is $12,500.
Construction Schedule: This is planned to be independent sidewalk construction work
that can be completed in the summer of 2015.
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 8a) Page 16
Title: 2015 Connect the Park! Projects
40th Street (West of Quentin Avenue to Wooddale Avenue)
Segment “r” in the attached resolution
Segment Overview: Currently there is sidewalk along the south side of 40th Street east of
Wooddale Avenue to the east end of the Wooddale Evangelical Lutheran Church. This
proposed segment fills a nine lot gap in the sidewalk between Wooddale Avenue and
Quentin Avenue.
Community Significance: Connections to Susan Lindgren Elementary School, Excelsior
and Grand and the surrounding neighborhoods.
Public Process: Staff has held one public open house with residents to discuss issues and
concerns.
Design: The construction of a five foot wide concrete sidewalk with a variable width
boulevard (4-6 feet) along the south side of 40th Street from Quentin Avenue to the
Church. The existing 4 foot wide sidewalk at the church would be removed and a 5 foot
sidewalk would be installed to Wooddale Avenue.
Walk Type: This is proposed to be a neighborhood walk and would be maintained by the
residents for snow removal.
Cost: The engineering cost estimate for the 1,000 feet of sidewalk is $90,000.
Construction Schedule: This is planned to be independent sidewalk construction work
that can be completed in the summer of 2015.
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 8a) Page 17
Title: 2015 Connect the Park! Projects
IMPACTS, EASEMENTS AND RIGHT OF ENTRY: All the proposed sidewalks for 2015
are challenging to build in a fully development community such St. Louis Park. The design and
implementation of these segments require flexibility in design standards and creativity in design
alternatives. Each sidewalk segment is unique and requires its own set of design solutions to
minimize and mitigate impacts to the community.
The designs presented to the residents and in this report acknowledge that tree loss and
temporary impacts to private property are two very sensitive issues. The proposed design
endeavors to balance the need for increased pedestrian facilities within the City with the impacts
to residents who live along these proposed sidewalks, trails and bikeways.
If these projects are approved, staff will work with residents to obtain the easements and right of
entry documents necessary to construct the various sidewalk and trails.
NEXT STEPS: The proposed schedule for the segments recommended by staff to facilitate
construction in 2015 is as follows:
Council Study Session February 23, 2015
Submit Project Report and Public Discussion March 2, 2015
Council Study Session March 9, 2015
Council Approval of Project Report March 16, 2015
Council Awards Construction Bids April 6, 2015
Construction May through October 2015
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Each sidewalk segment is unique and
requires its own set of design solutions to minimize and mitigate impacts in the right- of- way.
Often this requires more expensive solutions then is typically considered for standard sidewalk
construction. The increase in costs to construct these segments was acknowledged in the original
estimates during the Connect the Park! planning. Staff is confident that the estimates shown
above are within the budget approved by Council in June 2013.
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 8a) Page 18
Title: 2015 Connect the Park! Projects
RESOLUTION NO. 15-____
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE PROJECT REPORT FOR
PROJECT NO. 4015-2000, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS,
AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR SEGMENTS A-E
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park has received a report from the
Project Manager related to the 2015 Connect the Park! project.
WHEREAS, to take advantage of contract pricing and minimize construction disruption,
these segments will be bid with Project no. 4015-1003: Pavement Management Project (Area
3);
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis
Park, Minnesota, that:
1. The Project Report regarding Project No. 4015-2000 is hereby accepted.
2. Such improvements as proposed are necessary, cost effective, and feasible as detailed in the
Project Report.
3. The following segments are hereby established and ordered:
a) Flag Avenue (North of Franklin Avenue)
b) 18th Street (Hillsboro Avenue to Flag Avenue)
c) Hillsboro Avenue (18th Street to 14th Street)
d) 14th Street (Independence Avenue to Flag Avenue)
e) 14th Street (Wayzata Boulevard to Independence Avenue)
4. The plans and specifications for the making of these improvements, as prepared under the
direction of the Project Manager, or designee, are approved. The Project Manager is allowed
to make adjustments to these plans and specifications, such as narrowing the width of
boulevards or sidewalks, in cases where special circumstances exist in the field, such as the
location of trees, provided that these adjustments will make a material difference in
addressing any special circumstances that may exist.
5. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted at least two weeks in the official City
newspaper and in relevant industry publications an advertisement for bids for the making of
said improvements under said-approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall
appear not less than ten (10) days prior to the date and time bids will be received by the City
Clerk, and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the City Clerk and
accompanied by a bid bond payable to the City for five (5) percent of the amount of the bid.
6. The Project Manager, or designee, shall report the receipt of bids to the City Council shortly
after the letting date. The report shall include a tabulation of the bid results and a
recommendation to the City Council.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council March 16, 2015
City Manager
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 8a) Page 19
Title: 2015 Connect the Park! Projects
RESOLUTION NO. 15-____
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE PROJECT REPORT FOR
PROJECT NO. 4015-2000, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS,
AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR SEGMENTS F-I
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park has received a report from the
Project Manager related to the 2015 Connect the Park! segments;
WHEREAS, to take advantage of contract pricing and minimize construction disruption,
these segments will be bid with Project No. 4015-1100: 2015 Municipal State Aid
Reconstruction Project.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park,
Minnesota, that:
1. The Project Report regarding Project No. 4015-2000 is hereby accepted.
2. Such improvements as proposed are necessary, cost effective, and feasible as detailed in the
Project Report.
3. The following segments are hereby established and ordered:
f) Louisiana Avenue Trail (From Walker Street to 32nd Street)
g) 32nd Street Trail (Between Pennsylvania Avenue and Oregon Avenue)
h) Walker Street Sidewalk (Texas Ave to 37th St)
i) Walker Street Trail (Adjacent to Louisiana Oaks Park)
4. The plans and specifications for the making of these improvements, as prepared under the
direction of the Project Manager, or designee, are approved. The Project Manager is allowed
to make adjustments to these plans and specifications, such as narrowing the width of
boulevards or sidewalks, in cases where special circumstances exist in the field, such as the
location of trees, provided that these adjustments will make a material difference in
addressing any special circumstances that may exist.
5. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted at least two weeks in the official City
newspaper and in relevant industry publications an advertisement for bids for the making of
said improvements under said-approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall
appear not less than ten (10) days prior to the date and time bids will be received by the City
Clerk, and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the City Clerk and
accompanied by a bid bond payable to the City for five (5) percent of the amount of the bid.
6. The Project Manager, or designee, shall report the receipt of bids to the City Council shortly
after the letting date. The report shall include a tabulation of the bid results and a
recommendation to the City Council.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council March 16, 2014
City Manager
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 8a) Page 20
Title: 2015 Connect the Park! Projects
RESOLUTION NO. 15-____
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE PROJECT REPORT FOR
PROJECT NO. 4015-2000, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AND
AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR SEGMENTS J-R
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park has received a report from
the Project Manager related to the 2015 Connect the Park! segments;.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis
Park, Minnesota, that:
1. The Project Report regarding Project No. 4015-2000 is hereby accepted.
2. Such improvements as proposed are necessary, cost effective, and feasible as detailed in the
Project Report.
3. The proposed project, designated as Project No. 4015-2000, is hereby established and
ordered. The project includes the following segments:
j) Morningside Road (Wooddale Avenue to Oakdale Avenue (Edina))
k) Quentin Avenue (40th Street to Excelsior Boulevard)
l) Texas Avenue (Cedar Lake Road to Franklin Avenue)
m) 22nd Street (Texas Avenue to Quebec Drive)
n) Glenhurst Avenue (39th Street to 3830 Glenhurst Avenue)
o) Oregon Avenue (32nd Street to 3149 Oregon Avenue)
p) Vallacher Avenue (Quentin Avenue to 4915 Vallacher Avenue)
q) 40th Street (East of Quentin Avenue to 4001 Quentin Avenue)
r) 40th Street (West of Quentin Avenue to Wooddale Avenue)
4. The plans and specifications for the making of these improvements, as prepared under the
direction of the Project Manager, or designee, are approved. The Project Manager is allowed
to make adjustments to these plans and specifications, such as narrowing the width of
boulevards or sidewalks, in cases where special circumstances exist in the field, such as the
location of trees, provided that these adjustments will make a material difference in
addressing any special circumstances that may exist.
5. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted at least two weeks in the official City
newspaper and in relevant industry publications an advertisement for bids for the making of
said improvements under said-approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall
appear not less than ten (10) days prior to the date and time bids will be received by the City
Clerk, and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the City Clerk and
accompanied by a bid bond payable to the City for five (5) percent of the amount of the bid.
6. The Project Manager, or designee, shall report the receipt of bids to the City Council shortly
after the letting date. The report shall include a tabulation of the bid results and a
recommendation to the City Council.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council March 16, 2015
City Manager
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: March 16, 2015
Action Agenda Item: 8b
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Project Report: Municipal State Aid Project - Walker/36th Street - Project No. 4015-1100
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution accepting the project report,
establishing Improvement Project No. 4015-1100, approving plans and specifications, and
authorizing advertisement for bids.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish to continue implementation of the
City’s Pavement Management Program?
SUMMARY: Each year the City rehabilitates several miles of City streets. This particular
street is a Municipal State Aid (MSA) street. The proposed project generally consists of mill and
overlay or full depth pavement replacement, concrete curb and gutter, sidewalk, trail, signal
upgrades, bridge reconditioning, and miscellaneous utility replacement. Access to properties is
typically maintained throughout construction.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: This project was included in the City’s
Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) with an estimated budget of $2,262,750. The costs for
construction of this project have increased by approximately $430,000. This is due to the
pavement condition. The rehabilitation techniques assumed in the CIP were not sufficient for the
existing pavement condition. We have also added cost to reflect an industry cost escalator of
10% on construction materials and labor that is expected in 2015. Project funding will be
provided by Municipal State Aid Funds, Pavement Management Funds, and Utility Funds.
There are sufficient MSA funds available for this cost increase. Cost and funding details are as
follows:
Estimated Costs
Construction Cost $ 2,155,531
Contingencies (15%) $ 323,330
Engineering & Administration (10%) $ 215,553
Total $ 2,694,414
Funding Sources
Municipal State Aid $ 2,466,635
Pavement Management Fund $ 127,280
Water Utility Fund $ 53,599
Sanitary Utility Fund $ 46,900
Total $ 2,694,414
VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged
community.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion
Resolution
Project Map
Prepared by: Joseph Shamla, Senior Engineering Project Manager
Reviewed by: Debra Heiser, Engineering Director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 8b) Page 2
Title: Project Report: Municipal State Aid Project – Walker/36th Street – Project No. 4015-1100
DISCUSSION
BACKGROUND: The 2015 MSA Street Project is located on Walker Street/ 36th Street from
Highway 169 to Lake Street. The project includes pavement rehabilitation, 36th Street
Minnehaha Creek Bridge redecking, upgrade of 3 signal systems, storm sewer, sanitary sewer,
and watermain, replacement, sidewalk replacement, and the construction of new sidewalk and
trail. Walker / 36th Street is an MSA road and must meet MSA standards to qualify for funding.
The selection of Walker / 36th Street was based on condition surveys and field evaluations to
determine current conditions of the pavement, curb and gutter, and the city’s underground
utilities. Staff members from Operations and Engineering worked together to recommend
appropriate rehabilitation techniques for inclusion for this year’s project.
Two different techniques will be used rehabilitate Walker/ 36th Street. A map is attached for
your reference. Between Highway 169 and Texas Avenue, the road will be mill and overlaid.
This technique is used when full depth pavement replacement is not necessary since the base still
has structural integrity. Full depth replacement will occur between Texas Avenue and Lake Street.
The pavement base in these areas would not structurally support a mill and overlay technique.
As a part of the pavement replacement project the intersection of Walker and 37th Street will be
realigned. The predominant vehicle movement through this intersection is east west. Most
vehicles tend to stay on Walker Street. Upon completion of construction, Walker Street will be
the through street with a new stop sign installed for northbound lane 37th Street. The existing
stop sign on Walker Street is proposed to be removed.
There are three signal systems on 36th Street that will be upgraded as part of this project. The
signals are located at the intersections with Boone Avenue, Aquila Avenue, and Texas Avenue.
Flashing yellow arrows (FYA) will be added to improve the flow of traffic trying to make left
hand turns. New curb ramps with Audible Pedestrian Signals (APS) will also be installed to
make the intersections more pedestrian friendly.
This project is located within the Reilly Tar and Chemical Superfund Site. Summit
Environmental has completed the Response Action Plan (RAP) with the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA).
As a part of Connect the Park! initiative, bikeways and sidewalk will be added to Walker / 36th
Street. In areas where the street is wide enough, a 5 ft bike lane will be provided. In areas where
a 5 ft bike lane is not feasible, wide outside lanes will be provided to accommodate bikers. New
sidewalk will be added on the north side of Walker Street between Texas Avenue and Quebec.
Sidewalk will also be added on the south side of Walker Street between Quebec Avenue and 37th
Street. A new trail will be constructed on the north side of Walker Street adjacent to Louisiana
Oak Park. A map is attached for your reference. Note that specific approval of the sidewalk
segments along Walker Street will be done under Agenda Item 8d relating to the overall Connect
the Park project.
To accommodate the bikeway, parking is proposed to be restricted. Parking will need to be
prohibited on 36th Street from Highway 169 to Texas Avenue and on Walker Street from Texas
Avenue to 300 ft west of Republic Avenue. Walker Street from 300 ft west of Republic Avenue
and Lake Street is wide enough to accommodate parking, bike lanes, and drive lanes. No
parking resolutions will be brought to council on the April 20th agenda.
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 8b) Page 3
Title: Project Report: Municipal State Aid Project – Walker/36th Street – Project No. 4015-1100
The MSA project contract will include two other projects. The Connect the Park! segments
located along Walker Street, 32nd Street Sidewalk, and Louisiana Trail. Also, the Louisiana
Oaks Parking Lot will be reconstructed under this contract. The location of these projects in
relation to the Reilly Superfund Site require all of these projects to have a RAP and remove
contaminated materials. Staff feels that grouping these projects together will provide an overall
cost savings to the City. More information regarding the cost of the sidewalk and trail projects
are included with the Connect the Park! report.
Project Timeline:
Should the City Council approve this Project, the following schedule is proposed:
• Advertise for bids March 19, 2015
• Bid Opening April 8, 2015
• Bid Tab Report to City Council; Award contract April 20, 2015
• Begin Construction Late May, 2015
The project is anticipated to be completed this fall. During this work, residents will nearly
always have access to their driveways. However, driveways will not be accessible for 7 days
where concrete aprons are replaced.
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 8b) Page 4
Title: Project Report: Municipal State Aid Project – Walker/36th Street – Project No. 4015-1100
RESOLUTION NO. 15-___
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE PROJECT REPORT,
ESTABLISHING IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 4015-1100
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AND AUTHORIZING
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park has received a report from the
Project Engineer related to the Municipal State Aid Project- Walker / 36th Street- Project No.
4015-1100;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis
Park, Minnesota, that:
1. The Project Report regarding Project No. 4015-1100 is hereby accepted.
2. Such improvements as proposed are necessary, cost effective, and feasible as detailed in
the Project Report.
3. The proposed project is hereby established and ordered.
4. The plans and specifications for the making of these improvements, as prepared under the
direction of the Project Engineer, or designee, are approved.
5. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted at least two weeks in the official
City newspaper and in relevant industry publications an advertisement for bids for the
making of said improvements under said-approved plans and specifications. The
advertisement shall appear not less than ten (10) days prior to the date and time bids will
be received by the City Clerk, and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed
with the City Clerk and accompanied by a bid bond payable to the City for five (5)
percent of the amount of the bid.
6. The Project Engineer, or designee, shall report the receipt of bids to the City Council
shortly after the letting date. The report shall include a tabulation of the bid results and a
recommendation to the City Council.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council March 16, 2015
City Manager
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
¬«7 1STLI
B
R
A
R
Y
LOUIS
IANA GORHAMLAKE
WALKER
O
A
K
L
E
A
F
R
E
P
U
B
L
I
C
M
O
N
I
T
O
R
B
R
O
W
N
L
O
W
SERVICE DR HIGHWAY 72ND 0 75 150 225 300Feet
2015 MSAStreet CIP(East Section)
²
Legend
2" Mill and Overlay
Full Depth
Rehabilitation
Street Alignment
Sidewalk
TrailLAKECity Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 8b)
Title: Project Report: Municipal State Aid Project – Walker/36th Street – Project No. 4015-1100 Page 5
Ê
Louisiana Oaks
Park
¬«7PENNSYLVANIA JERSEYGORHAM1STLOUISIANA33RD
WALKER
34TH
RHODE ISLAND32 1/2
32ND
35TH
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
B
R
O
W
N
L
O
W
37THQUEBECR
E
P
U
B
L
I
C
O A K P A R K V I L L A G E
KENTUCKY2NDPRIVATE0 125 250 375 500Feet
2015 MSAStreet CIP(Middle Section)
²
Legend
2" Mill and Overlay
Full Depth
Rehabilitation
Street Alignment
Sidewalk
Trail
Ê Louisiana Oaks
parking lot
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 8b)
Title: Project Report: Municipal State Aid Project – Walker/36th Street – Project No. 4015-1100 Page 6
£¤169
¬«7 PENNSYLVANIATEXASBLAKELAKE
32ND
EDGEB
R
O
O
K
34TH
S E R V I C E
D
R
H
I
G HW A Y 7
WALKER
37THAQUILA35TH
33RD
36TH WYOMINGDIVISION
32 1/2
SUNSETRIDGERHODE ISLANDSUMTERYUKON34 1/2
WOODLANDQUEBECZINRANCAVELLXYLONVIRGINIAUTAHNORTHPHILLIPSCAMBRIDGE
A Q U IL A A V E S T O W B HW Y7KNOLLWOODMALLACCES
MINNEHAHA
FLAGBOONEDECATURHWY7TONBHWY169SPRIVATE0 225 450 675 900Feet
2015 MSAStreet CIP(West Section)
²
Legend
2" Mill and Overlay
Full Depth
Rehabilitation
Street Alignment
Sidewalk
Trail
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 8b)
Title: Project Report: Municipal State Aid Project – Walker/36th Street – Project No. 4015-1100 Page 7
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: March 16, 2015
Action Agenda Item: 8c
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Traffic Study No. 651: Authorize Parking Restrictions on Ottawa Avenue (28th Street
& Highway 25)
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution authorizing installation of Ottawa
Avenue Parking Restrictions.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: The restriction is allowed per the City’s established regulatory
authority.
SUMMARY: The Engineering staff has been working on parking restrictions on Ottawa
Avenue between 28th Street and Highway 25. The proposed change in parking is in response to
neighborhood concerns and a request from Metro Transit. The Highway 100 project will
increase traffic and make traveling on Ottawa Ave difficult with cars parked on both sides of the
street. The City held public meetings and mailed informational letters to residents to get
comments on the parking changes. The City has received support of the change from the
neighborhood residents. Staff also met with the apartment managers to ensure that they were
aware of the proposed restrictions; they did not raise objections to the proposal.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The cost of enacting these controls is
minimal and will come out of the general operating budget.
VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged
community.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion
Resolution
Ottawa Parking Restrictions Map
Prepared by: Aaron Wiesen, Civil Engineer
Reviewed by: Debra M. Heiser, Engineering Director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Page 2
Title: Traffic Study No. 651: Authorize Parking Restrictions on Ottawa Avenue (28th Street & Highway 25)
DISCUSSION
Background: As a part of MnDOT’s Highway 100 reconstruction project, there will be a
number of closures that will impact traffic in St. Louis Park. These include various weekend
closures of Highway 100, and the Minnetonka Boulevard Bridge over Highway 100 will be
closed from approximately April to August 2015. These closures will increase traffic on Ottawa
Avenue.
In addition to these closures, Ottawa Avenue between Highway 25 and Minnetonka Boulevard is
being used as a detour route for Metro Transit when the Minnetonka Blvd bridge is closed. With
current traffic volumes, on street parking along both sides of Ottawa Avenue between W. 28th
Street and Highway 25 can narrow the travel lanes on the road making it difficult for vehicles to
pass by each other. Traffic on Ottawa Avenue is expected to increase as a result of the Highway
100 construction and additional future development in the area. In order to ensure that this street
is safe for vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians, and that it has adequate traffic capacity, the City
proposed additional on street parking restrictions.
Staff understands that these restrictions may have impacts on the neighborhood surrounding
Ottawa Avenue. The city held a public meeting on January 14 to discuss proposed parking
restrictions, and made some modifications based on feedback at that meeting. Staff proposes the
following parking restrictions to maximize available parking along Ottawa Avenue. These
restrictions are shown on the attached map:
Ottawa Avenue (between W. 28th St and Minnetonka Boulevard)
• Prohibit parking on the west side at all times.
Ottawa Avenue (between Minnetonka Boulevard and Hwy 25)
• Prohibit parking on the east side at all times. (between Minnetonka Blvd. and Hwy 25)
• Prohibit parking on the west side at all times (from Minnetonka Blvd. to the first
driveway to the south)
• Restrict parking on the west side during weekday morning and evening rush hour (6-9 am
and 4-6pm M-F). (between the first driveway south of Minnetonka Blvd and the
Frontage Road)
• Prohibit parking on the west side at all times (from Frontage Road to Highway 25)
Existing Conditions On street parking spaces
Ottawa Avenue West side East side Total
W. 28th St to Minnetonka Blvd. 44 45 89
Minnetonka Blvd. to Hwy 25 28 18- Restricted 6-9
am and 4-6pm M-F
28
18 restricted
Proposed Conditions On street parking spaces
Ottawa Avenue West side East side Total
W. 28th St to Minnetonka Blvd. 0 45 45
Minnetonka Blvd. to Hwy 25 28- Restricted 6-9
am and 4-6pm M-F
0 28 restricted
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 8c) Page 3
Title: Traffic Study No. 651: Authorize Parking Restrictions on Ottawa Avenue (28th Street & Highway 25)
RESOLUTION NO. 15-___
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING INSTALLATION OF
“NO PARKING” - RESTRICTIONS ON OTTAWA STREET
BETWEEN 28TH STREET AND CSAH 25
TRAFFIC STUDY NO. 651
WHEREAS, with current traffic volumes, on street parking along both sides of Ottawa
Avenue between W. 28th Street and Highway 25 can narrow the travel lanes on the road making
it difficult for vehicles to pass by each other, and;
WHEREAS, traffic on Ottawa Avenue is expected to increase as a result of the Highway
100 construction and additional future development in the area; and
WHEREAS, it is important to that this street is safe for vehicles, bicycles, and
pedestrians, and that it has adequate traffic capacity;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis
Park, Minnesota, that the Engineering Director is hereby authorized to install the following ‘No
Parking” restrictions:
1. Ottawa Avenue (between W. 28th St and Minnetonka Boulevard)
• Prohibit parking on the west side at all times.
2. Ottawa Avenue (between Minnetonka Boulevard and Hwy 25)
• Prohibit parking on the east side at all times. (between Minnetonka Blvd. and
Hwy 25)
• Prohibit parking on the west side at all times (from Minnetonka Blvd. to the first
driveway)
• Restrict parking on the west side during weekday morning and evening peak
hours (6-9 am and 4-6pm M-F). (between the first driveway and the Frontage Rd)
• Prohibit parking on the west side at all times (from Frontage Rd to Highway 25)
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council March 16, 2015
City Manager
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
")25
")5
")25
28TH
29TH
OTTAWANATCHEZ31ST
MINNETONKAQUENTIN
RALEIGHLYNNPRINCETONMONTE
RE
Y
SERVIC
E
D
R
HI
G
H
W
A
Y
7MONTEREY
LYNNMONTEREYRALEIGHSERVI
C
E
D
R
HI
G
H
W
A
Y
7
5005
4810
4725
4925
4500
2927
4521
4400
30303115 294045504550
45504550
45504550
45504550
4550
4550
4550
4550
2800
4835
4625
4625
4625
4625
46014701 301630003000300030003000300030003000300047114509 44212831 44234800
3030
4516451645162837
2855
2825
460048202848 284048014815460446143046
2840
4700471647242950
2920
50242825
30062939
2821
451728393100
2843
4605
2835
2815
2844
29112905
2830
2821461546252820
48153014
311547002810 450345012809
2925 45112810
2928
3052 45014525
2847
2841
50203020
2920
2926
3036
2835
2930
2837 28302921
3042
3200
2900
2909
2848
47082948
2944
48012947
2945
3108
2820
292547174723481150332853
2829
3020
3024
29005025
2908
2815
2809
2829
2901
2931
2800
28214901
2936
2811
2915
28162817
2847
503250242841
2817
2823
2901
290729064907491349192801
3050
2856 2859
462446003045
3041
3037
3033
3017
3029
3025
3021
3044
2900
2916
2856
2850
2844
2838
2832
2826
2820
2816
2810
2912
2804
2846
2834
2850
28302831
2820
2837
2840
2827
2821
2826
46204614461046042937
29302933
29242929
2925
2919
2912
2934
2905
2934
29282925
2917
2904
2924
2931
2921
2914
2909
2913
2910
2920
29402937
3013
3040
2912
2908
2940
2
9
0
0
2909
2913
2917
2921
2925
2929
2935
2937
3017
3025
3033
3041 3034
3100
3104
2905
30483049
2901
3021
3029
3037 3028
3045 3044
3101
3105
3109
2936
2933
2929
2925 2924
29202921
2917 2916
2913
2909
2905
2901
3028
3044
3041
3049
3053
3032
3036
3040
3024
3009290029042914291829082924Proposed Ottawa Avenue Parking Restrictions
(28th St. to Hwy. 25)
Legend
No Parking Anytime
No Parking M-F (6-9 am and 4-6 pm)
Parcels
0 270 540 810 1,080
Feet
Ë
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 8c)
Title: Traffic Study No. 651: Authorize Parking Restrictions on Ottawa Avenue (28th Street & Highway 25)Page 4
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: March 16, 2015
Action Agenda Item: 8d
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Conditional Use Permit for Excavation at 4106 Forest Lane
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution approving a Conditional Use
Permit (CUP) to export approximately 816 cubic yards of fill, subject to conditions
recommended by staff.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the proposed CUP meet the conditions of the Zoning
Ordinance?
SUMMARY: The applicant was hired by Sunny and Tiffany Han to design a house for their
property at 4106 Forest Ln. The property is a vacant parcel with a significant grade change. It
increases 31 feet from the street curb to the rear property line. The grade change will require
excavating a building pad into the hill.
A CUP is required by the zoning ordinance when more than 400 cubic yards is removed from a
property. Typically a CUP would not be required to excavate a basement for a single family
home, however, in this case, more than 400 cubic yards will be excavated because of the
significant grade change.
The CUP was presented to the Planning Commission where a public hearing was conducted.
Nobody spoke at the public hearing, and the Planning Commission recommended approval.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion
Aerial Photo
Draft Resolution
Excerpt of Planning Commission Minutes
Letter from Applicant
Haul Route
Development Plans
Prepared by: Gary Morrison, Assistant Zoning Administrator
Reviewed by: Sean Walther, Senior Planner
Michele Schnitker, Housing Supervisor
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 8d) Page 2
Title: Conditional Use Permit for Excavation at 4106 Forest Lane
DISCUSSION
Zoning: R-1 Single Family Residential
Comprehensive Plan: Low Density Residential
Applicant: Timothy Alt, ALTUS Architecture & Design
Description of Request:
Requested is a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to export approximately 816 cubic yards of fill
which is required for the construction of a new house.
Background:
The applicant was hired by Sunny and
Tiffany Han to design a house for this
property. The property is a vacant parcel
with a significant grade change, 31 feet
from the rear property line to the street
curb. The CUP is required to excavate
enough soil from the hillside to construct
the house.
Location:
The subject property is located in the
Lake Forest Neighborhood. It is on the
north side of Forest Lane, just west of
the Forest Road/Forest Lane
intersection.
Analysis:
Excavation:
The details of the excavation are as follows:
Truck loads: 68
Trucks per day: 14
Number of days of hauling: 5 days
Hours of operation: 8am to 5pm
Date hauling begins: The start date is dependent upon when the road weight restrictions
are removed, which is typically mid-April.
Haul Route: The trucks will utilize County 25 - France Ave - Forest Road –
Forest Lane. A map showing the haul route is attached.
Erosion Control:
An erosion control plan was reviewed and preliminarily approved by the City Engineering
Department. An erosion control permit is required from the City and the Minnehaha Creek
Watershed District. The required erosion control measures must be in place prior to commencing
the project.
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 8d) Page 3
Title: Conditional Use Permit for Excavation at 4106 Forest Lane
The erosion control review is focusing on the steep grades and erosion potential for this site. The
applicant intends to limit the amount of grading within 10 feet from the side property lines and
keep the bulk of the excavation in the center of the property. Additionally, erosion control
double net blankets will be utilized along the slopes. Silt fence will be installed around the
perimeter of the site, and a mulch berm will be installed across the construction driveway.
Stormwater:
The site will be graded so that runoff water will not go onto neighboring properties. The water
will be directed to the street by swales along the side property lines.
Proposed House:
While the purpose of the CUP application is the removal of 816 cubic yards of soil, a copy of the
plans for the proposed home was submitted with the application for information purposes only.
The plans show that the proposed home is well within the scale of other homes in the area. It is a
two-story with a tuck-under garage. A copy of the home plans are attached to the report.
Neighborhood Meeting:
A neighborhood meeting was conducted on Saturday, February 14th. The neighbors were in
attendance and asked several questions about the home and construction. They appeared to be
satisfied with the answers and process, and welcomed the future homeowners.
Planning Commission Review:
The Planning Commission conducted the public hearing and no comments from the public were
received. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the CUP. A copy of the
unofficial meeting minutes is attached.
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 8d) Page 4
Title: Conditional Use Permit for Excavation at 4106 Forest Lane
AERIAL PHOTO
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 8d) Page 5
Title: Conditional Use Permit for Excavation at 4106 Forest Lane
RESOLUTION NO. 15-____
A RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT UNDER
SECTION 36-79(b) OF THE ST. LOUIS PARK ORDINANCE CODE
RELATING TO ZONING TO PERMIT EXCAVATION OF
APPROXIMATELY 816 CUBIC YARDS OF SOIL FROM PROPERTY
ZONED R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT LOCATED AT
4106 FOREST LANE
BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park:
Findings
1. Timothy Alt, Altus Architecture & Design has made application to the City Council for a
Conditional Use Permit under Section 36-79(b) of the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code for the
purpose of excavating 816 cubic yards of soil within a R-1 Single Family District located at
4106 Forest Lane for the legal description as follows, to-wit:
LOT 8, EXCEPT THAT PART THEREOF WHICH LIES WESTERLY OF A LINE
DRAWN FROM THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 8 TO A POINT
OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 8 DISTANT 17 FEET EASTERLY FROM THE
MOST NORTHERLY CORNER THEREOF, BLOCK 4, “FOREST TRACT, LAKE
FOREST ADDITION”
2. The City Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning
Commission (Case No. 15-02-CUP) and the effect of the proposed excavation on the health,
safety and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic
conditions, the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area, the effect of the use on
the Comprehensive Plan, and compliance with the intent of the Zoning Ordinance.
3. The Council has determined that the excavation will not be detrimental to the health,
safety, or general welfare of the community nor will it cause serious traffic congestion nor
hazards, nor will it seriously depreciate surrounding property values, and the proposed
excavation is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the
Comprehensive Plan.
4. The contents of Planning Case File 15-02-CUP are hereby entered into and made part of
the public hearing record and the record of decision for this case.
Conclusion
The Conditional Use Permit to permit excavation of approximately 816 cubic yards of soil at
the location described is granted based on the findings set forth above and subject to the
following conditions:
Prior to commencing land disturbing activities:
1. All conditions for stormwater management shall be met.
2. All necessary permits must be obtained.
3. Prior to issuance of permits, the following conditions shall be met:
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 8d) Page 6
Title: Conditional Use Permit for Excavation at 4106 Forest Lane
a. Applicant shall submit financial security in the form of a cash escrow or letter of
credit in the amount of $5,000 to ensure the streets will be kept clean and to repair
damage to City, streets, stormwater lines or other public infrastructure that may result
from the construction activity.
b. Assent form and official exhibits must be signed by the applicant and owner.
4. The applicant shall comply with the following conditions during grading and stormwater
facility construction:
a. All City noise ordinances shall be complied with, including that there be no
construction activity between the hours of 7:00 PM and 7:00 AM, Monday through
Friday, and 7:00 PM and 9:00 AM, Saturday, Sunday and Holidays.
b. Loud equipment shall be kept as far as possible from residences at all times.
c. Public streets shall be maintained free of dirt and shall be cleaned as necessary.
d. The Zoning Administrator may impose additional conditions if it becomes necessary
in order to mitigate the impact of excavation on surrounding properties.
5. Trucks shall utilize County Road 25, France Ave, Forest Road and Forest Lane.
6. The site shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with Exhibits
incorporated by reference herein.
7. In addition to any other remedies, the developer or owner shall pay an administrative fee
of $750 per violation of any condition of this approval.
8. Under the Zoning Ordinance Code, this permit shall be revoked and cancelled if the
building or structure for which the conditional use permit is granted is removed.
9. Approval of permits, which may impose additional requirements.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council March 16, 2015
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 8d) Page 7
Title: Conditional Use Permit for Excavation at 4106 Forest Lane
EXCERPT OF UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
FEBRUARY 25, 2015 – 6:10 p.m.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MEMBERS PRESENT: Lynne Carper, Claudia Johnston-Madison,
Richard Person, Carl Robertson, Joe Tatalovich
MEMBERS ABSENT: Robert Kramer, Lisa Peilen
STAFF PRESENT: Ryan Kelley, Meg McMonigal, Gary Morrison,
Nancy Sells
3. Public Hearings
A. Conditional Use Permit – Excavation for new home
Location: 4106 Forest Lane
Applicant: Timothy Alt, ALTUS Architecture & Design
Case No.: 15-02-CUP
Gary Morrison, Assistant Zoning Administrator, presented the staff report. He stated the
Conditional Use Permit (CUP) is requested to export approximately 816 cubic yards of
fill which is required for the construction of a new house. He explained that the property
is a vacant parcel with a significant grade change and the CUP is required to excavate
enough soil from the hillside to construct the house. Mr. Morrison noted that an erosion
control plan was reviewed by the Engineering Dept. That plan is also under review by the
Minnehaha Creek Watershed District.
Mr. Morrison reviewed the trucking haul route. Hauling will take approximately 5 days.
Mr. Morrison stated that a neighborhood meeting was held on February 14th. No
concerns were raised at the meeting.
Commissioner Carper spoke about Condition No. 4.c. regarding street maintenance
during grading and stormwater construction. He discussed the importance of compliance
with this condition.
Chair Person opened the hearing. As no one was present wishing to speak he closed the
public hearing.
Commissioner Robertson stated that applicant did a good job of removing a minimal
amount of soil to achieve a very good design. He said it will be an attractive addition to
the neighborhood.
Commissioner Carper said he likes the design of the home. He said he is pleased to see
that trees will be kept on the lot.
Commissioner Robertson made a motion recommending approval of the Conditional Use
Permit to export approximately 816 cubic yards of fill. Commissioner Johnston-Madison
seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 5-0.
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 8d) Page 8
Title: Conditional Use Permit for Excavation at 4106 Forest Lane
Letter from Applicant
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 8d) Page 9
Title: Conditional Use Permit for Excavation at 4106 Forest Lane
Letter from Applicant
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 8d)
Title: Conditional Use Permit for Excavation at 4106 Forest Lane Page 10
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 8d) Title: Conditional Use Permit for Excavation at 4106 Forest LanePage 11
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 8d) Title: Conditional Use Permit for Excavation at 4106 Forest LanePage 12
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 8d) Title: Conditional Use Permit for Excavation at 4106 Forest LanePage 13
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 8d) Title: Conditional Use Permit for Excavation at 4106 Forest LanePage 14
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 8d) Title: Conditional Use Permit for Excavation at 4106 Forest LanePage 15
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 8d) Title: Conditional Use Permit for Excavation at 4106 Forest LanePage 16
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 8d) Title: Conditional Use Permit for Excavation at 4106 Forest LanePage 17
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: March 16, 2015
Action Agenda Item: 8e
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Bee-Safe Community Resolution
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution endorsing “Bee-Safe” policies and
procedures.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: Is the City Council supportive of declaring the City of St. Louis
Park as a Bee-Safe community by providing pollinator areas, educating the public on the benefits
of such areas, and passing a resolution in support of these efforts?
SUMMARY: At the request of the Council, staff provided a report on declaring the City of St.
Louis Park as a Bee-Safe Community at the Council’s November 10, 2014 Study Session.
Recent research has found that native and non-native bee (i.e. honeybees) populations, and other
pollinator populations, have been declining. This is due to a number of factors, including
pervasive insecticide use, habitat loss, pathogens, and diseases. The City of St. Louis Park has
been using Integrated Pest Management (IPM) practices for over 15 years related to grass and
turf and only chemically treats selected park turf areas, such as ball fields and high use parks, to
reduce the wear and tear on the turf. A majority of mowed areas in the City park system are left
untreated and provide large areas of dandelion and white clover growths which are ideal early
spring plants for pollinators (considered “pollinator areas”). Specific parks can be deemed Bee-
Safe by not spraying chemicals and providing a diversity of plants for pollinators. Since we are
already consciously using few chemicals, this can be done without any changes to current
maintenance policies, procedures and protocol.
By declaring the City of St. Louis Park as Bee-Safe, the City would be actively supporting and
providing pollinator areas and opportunities throughout our park system and City-owned
properties (open space and random lots) and educating the public on the benefits of providing
such areas. After this initial report was presented, the Bee-Safe resolution was reviewed and
commented upon by interested local parties, including the local citizen group Humming for
Bees. With input from this group, the earlier proposed resolution has been modified.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Any costs associated with declaring the
City Bee Friendly are negligible.
VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a leader in environmental
stewardship. We will increase environmental consciousness and responsibility in all areas of city
business.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion
Proposed Bee-Safe Parks
Resolution
Prepared by: Jim Vaughan, Environmental Coordinator
Reviewed by: Cindy Walsh, Director of Operations and Recreation
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
DISCUSSION
BACKGROUND: Pesticides, namely insecticides, have traditionally been applied onto plants
and crops. This has allowed for the insecticides to weather and wash away. Neonicotinoid
pesticides are a new class of systemic insecticides chemically related to nicotine. The name
literally means “new nicotine-like insecticides”. Neonicotinoids are also used in turf to help
control a number of insect pests, most importantly grubs. They work by "dissolving" into the
irrigation water or rain, which is then taken up by the plant and becomes part of the leaf and root
tissue. This ensures that any insect munching on the tissues of the grass gets a lethal dose, and
the lawn stays green.
Bee advocates argue that Neonicotinoids are responsible for honey bee (and other bees) Colony
Collapse Disorder. CCD is an event where large populations of the bee colony, particularly the
worker bees, disappear or die off. Without the worker bees, the queen and brood will eventually
exhaust the honey reserve and kill off the remaining bees.
Experts in this area believe the decline in bees is due to a number of interacting factors, including
reduction in stable food sources, introduction of bee diseases and parasites, and the rampant use
of systemic (system-wide) insecticides. We can make efforts to change some of these factors in
hope of increasing bee populations.
PRESENT CONSIDERATIONS: Currently the City of St. Louis Park contracts with Phillip's
Tree Care, LLC. for any herbicide (pesticide) treatments. Philip’s Tree Care, LLC uses
Glyphosate and Millennium herbicides, not neonicotinoids. The chemicals used by Phillip’s are
not insecticides and have been determined safe for public use by the EPA.
The City’s Park Maintenance division has been using Integrated Pest Management (IPM)
practices for over 15 years related to grass and turf, only chemically treating (currently via
Phillip’s Tree Care, LLC) selected high-use park turf areas, such as ball fields and high use parks
(i.e. Oak Hill) to reduce the wear and tear on the turf. A majority of mowed areas in City park
system are left untreated and retain and provide large areas of dandelion and white clover
growths which are ideal early spring plants for pollinators (considered “pollinator areas”).
Specific (and many if so desired) parks can easily be deemed Bee-Friendly (no spraying of
chemicals and providing a diversity of plants for pollinators) without any changes to current
maintenance policies, procedures and protocol.
The City currently has and continues to create numerous raingardens, prairie areas, wildflower
buffer strips (along lakes and wooded areas), perennial gardens and many residential native
landscapes. The City has also been successful in purchasing plants and trees that have not been
treated with Neonicotinoids for landscape needs. These purchased plants and trees are put into
perennial gardens, wildflower areas, buffer strips, raingardens, boulevards and other landscapes.
NEXT STEPS: Adopt a Bee-Safe City Resolution, similar to one recently adopted in
Shorewood, Minnesota. The Bee-Safe City Resolution contains the following:
1. Turn public spaces into featured Bee-Safe areas (proposed parks are Browndale, Fern
Hill, Lamplighter, Minikahda Vista, Shelard, Twin Lakes, Westwood Hills Nature
Center, and Bass Lake Preserve).
2. Plant neonicotinoid-free (and other systemic insecticides-free as feasible) seeds, shrubs,
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 8e)
Title: Bee-Safe Community Resolution Page 2
flowers and trees.
3. No insecticide spraying of the Bee Food (pollinator plants) -not on it, not near it.
4. Continue pursuing Integrated Pest Management (IPM) practices in all City parks.
5. Educate all citizens of St. Louis Park about bees: their gifts and needs.
6. Begin to implement this resolution in spring of 2015.
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 8e)
Title: Bee-Safe Community Resolution Page 3
QR3
§¨¦394
§¨¦394
³±100
³±7 ³±100
³±7
³±100³±7
£¤169
£¤169
QR3
QR25
QR5
QR20
QR5
k
k
k
k
k
k
k
k
A
A
B
B
C
C
D
D
E
E
F
F
G
G
H
H
8 8
7 7
6 6
5 5
4 4
3 3
2 2
1 1
/0 1 20.5
Miles
we
Proposed Bee-Safe Parks
k Bee-Safe Park
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 8e)
Title: Bee-Safe Community Resolution Page 4
RESOLUTION NO. 15-_____
RESOLUTION ENDORSING "BEE-SAFE"
POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
WHEREAS, bees and other pollinators are integral to a wide diversity of essential foods
including fruit, nuts, and vegetables; and
WHEREAS bees and other pollinators are threatened due to habitat loss and pesticide
use; and native bees and honey bees are also threatened due to pathogens and parasites; and
WHEREAS pollinators need to eat throughout the growing season, early spring through
fall; and
WHEREAS, recent research suggests that there is a link between pesticides that contain
neonicotinoids and the die-off of plant pollinators, including honeybees, native bees, butterflies,
moths, and other insects; and
WHEREAS, neonicotinoids are synthetic chemical insecticides that are similar in
structure and action to nicotine, a naturally occurring plant compound; and
WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park is committed to Hennepin County's Integrated
Pest Management (IPM) program, which considers the use of pesticides as a last resort, while the
potential for the use of biological controls such as parasitoids and microbes could be a safer
option; and
WHEREAS, the Precautionary Principle states that in environmental matters, the theory
that if the effects of a product or action are unknown, then the product should not be used and the
action should not be taken.
WHEREAS, although Americans' annual expenditures on lawn and garden products
ranks third highest in how we spend our money, most Americans lack knowledge of the toxic
consequences of their purchases; and
WHEREAS, citizens need current, science-based information regarding environmentally
sound garden and pest practices so that they can make informed decisions, and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds it is in the public interest and consistent with
the City’s Vision of Environmental Stewardship for the City to demonstrate its commitment to a
safe and healthy community environment through the implementation of best management
practices in the maintenance of the city parks, open spaces and city property.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
St. Louis Park, Minnesota, that:
1. The City shall undertake its best efforts to become a Bee-Safe City based upon the
Precautionary Principle.
2. The City shall adhere to Hennepin County’s Integrated Pest Management (IPM)
program parameters, emphasizing biological controls over pesticides.
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 8e)
Title: Bee-Safe Community Resolution Page 5
3. The City shall refrain from the use of systemic neonicotinoid pesticides on St. Louis
Park City property.
4. The City shall undertake its best efforts to prescribe and use systemic neonicotinoid-
free plants, seeds, and products favorable to bees and other pollinators in the City's public
spaces.
5. The City shall designate Bee-Safe areas (Browndale, Fern Hill, Lamplighter,
Minikahda Vista, Shelard, Twin Lakes Parks, Westwood Hills Nature Center, and Bass Lake
Preserve) which feature City plantings that are free from systemic pesticides including
neonicotinoids.
6. The City shall undertake best efforts to communicate to St. Louis Park residents the
importance of creating and maintaining a pollinator-friendly habitat.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council March 16, 2015
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
City Council Meeting of March 16, 2015 (Item No. 8e)
Title: Bee-Safe Community Resolution Page 6