Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2026/07/06 - ADMIN - Agenda Packets - City Council - RegularAGENDA JULY 6, 2026 6:00 p.m. Economic Development Authority meeting – Council Chambers 1. Call to order. 2. Approve agenda. 3. Minutes. a.EDA meeting minutes of June 15, 2026 4. Consent item. a.Approve EDA disbursements 5. Public hearings – none. 6. Regular business – none. 7. Communications and announcements – none. 8. Adjournment. 6:15 p.m. City council meeting – Council Chambers 1.Call to order. a.Roll call. b.Pledge of Allegiance. 2.Approve agenda. 3.Presentations. a.Proclamation observing National Disability Independence Day b.Recognition of donations 4.Minutes. a.Study session meeting minutes of June 8, 2026 b.City council meeting minutes of June 15, 2026 c.Closed executive session meeting minutes of June 15, 2026 5.Consent items. a.Approve city disbursements b.Resolution accepting donations to the city for the parks and recreation department c.Resolution accepting donations to the city for the fire department d.Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A e.Resolution amending change order policy f.Second reading and adoption of ordinance amending Chapter 3 of the city code related to temporary liquor licenses g.Approve temporary on-sale intoxicating liquor license - Church of the Holy Family h.Resolution authorizing final payment for the 2025 Sanitary Sewer Mainline Rehabilitation project (4025-3000) Agenda EDA, city council and special study session meetings of July 6, 2026 i.Resolution approving grant agreement with MnDOT for Cedar Lake Road and Louisiana Avenue Improvements project - Ward 4 j.Resolution authorizing special assessment for sewer service line repair at 3340 Rhode Island Avenue South - Ward 3 k.Resolution approving special assessment for sewer service line repair at 3920 Lynn Avenue South - Ward 2 l.Resolutions supporting DEED redevelopment grant application for Creekline Flats - Ward 3 m.Resolution supporting Sentinel Management company's application for Hennepin County ERF grant for the Wooddale Station - Ward 2 n.Approve quote to supply lighting materials for a replacement project at Keller Baseball Field in Dakota Park - Ward 1 6. Public hearing. a.Public hearing for new liquor license - Best of India Inc dba Best of India 7. Regular business - none. 8. Communications and announcements – none. 9. Adjournment. Following city council meeting – Special study session – Council Chambers Discussion Items 1. St. Louis Park school district community engagement regarding referendum 2. 2026 Legislative Session wrap-up Written Reports 3. Good Governance system kick-off 4. Disposition of public land adjacent to 2754 Xenwood Avenue South - Ward 1 Members of the public can attend St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority and city council meetings in person. At regular city council meetings, members of the public may comment on any item on the agenda by attending the meeting in-person or by submitting written comments to info@stlouisparkmn.gov by noon the day of the meeting. Official minutes of meetings are available on the city website once approved. Watch St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority or regular city council meetings live at bit.ly/watchslpcouncil or at www.parktv.org, or on local cable (Comcast SD channel 14/HD channel 798). Recordings of the meetings are available to watch on the city's YouTube channel at www.youtube.com/@slpcable, usually within 24 hours of the meeting’s end. City council study sessions are not broadcast. Generally, it is not council practice to receive public comment during study sessions. The council chambers are equipped with Hearing Loop equipment and headsets are available to borrow. If you need special accommodations or have questions about the meeting, please call 952.924.2505. Meeting: Economic development authority Meeting date: July 6, 2026 Minutes: 3a Unofficial minutes EDA meeting St. Louis Park, Minnesota June 15, 2026 1.Call to order. President Farris called the meeting to order at 6:03 p.m. a.Roll call Commissioners present: Daniel Bashore, Jim Engelking, Sue Budd, Tim Brausen, President Yolanda Farris Commissioners absent: Commissioners Nadia Mohamed and Paul Baudhuin Staff present: city manager (Ms. Keller), city attorney (Mr. Mattick), communications and technology director (Ms. Smith), deputy city clerk (Ms. Scott-Lerdal) 2.Approve agenda. It was moved by Commissioner Brausen, seconded by Commissioner Budd, to approve the agenda as presented. The motion passed 5 – 0 (Commissioners Mohamed and Baudhuin absent). a.EDA meeting minutes of June 1, 2026 It was moved by Commissioner Engelking, seconded by Commissioner Brausen, to approve the EDA meeting minutes of June 1, 2026, as presented. The motion passed 5 – 0 (Commissioners Mohamed and Baudhuin absent). 4.Consent item. a.EDA Resolution No. 26-16 approving subgrant agreement for Hennepin County cleanup funds for Beltline Station – Ward 1 It was moved by Commissioner Bashore, seconded by Commissioner Budd, to approve the consent item as listed and to waive reading of all resolutions. The motion passed 5 – 0 (Commissioners Mohamed and Baudhuin absent). 5.Public hearings – none. 6.Regular business – none. Economic development authority meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 3a) Page 2 Title: Meeting minutes of June 15, 2026 7. Communications and announcements – none. 8. Adjournment. The EDA meeting adjourned at 6:05 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Yolanda Farris, president These minutes were created with the assistance of a generative AI transcript service, then edited and finalized by a city staff person. Meeting: Economic development authority Meeting date: July 6, 2026 Consent agenda item: 4a Executive summary Title: Approve EDA disbursements Recommended action: Motion to approve EDA disbursement claims for the period of May 27 through June 29, 2026. Policy consideration: Does the EDA approve the disbursements listed for the period ending June 29, 2026? Summary: The finance division prepares this report monthly for the EDA to review and approve. The attached report shows both EDA disbursements paid by physical check and those by wire transfer or Automated Clearing House (ACH) when applicable. Financial or budget considerations: Review and approval of disbursements by the EDA is required and provides another layer of oversight to further ensure fiscal stewardship. Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: EDA disbursement summary Prepared by: Estela Mulugeta, accounting specialist Reviewed by: Joe Olson, deputy finance director Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 6/29/20265/27/2026 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 414.46CENTERPOINT ENERGY EDA - 4300 36 1/2 G&A Heating Gas Utility 414.46 2,600.00EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC General Fund BS GENERAL 2,600.00 52.00KUTAK ROCK LLP Development - EDA G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 52.00 21.32MONSON JENNIFER Development - EDA G&A Employee Mileage Reimbursement 21.32 55.83PATER JASE Development - EDA G&A Employee Mileage Reimbursement 26.00Development - EDA G&A Other Travel, Conv & Conf 81.83 839.40WHIPPER SNAPPER LAWN SERVICE Development - EDA G&A Repairs and Maintenance 839.40 Report Totals 4,185.62 XCEL ENERGY EDA - 4300 36 1/2 G&A 176.612 Economic Development Authority meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approve EDA disbursements Page 2 Meeting: City council Meeting date: July 6, 2026 Presentation: 3a Executive summary Title: Proclamation observing National Disability Independence Day Recommended action: Mayor to read the proclamation. Policy consideration: None. Summary: National Disability Independence Day marks the importance of the signing of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in 1990. The ADA came from decades of activism and advocacy by people with disabilities with the goal of legally requiring access and protection from discrimination based on ability. The ADA is foundational to full participation in society, including access to employment, transportation, housing and dignity for people with disabilities. By celebrating this day as a significant point in history for disability independence, our city continues to support our vision of being an inclusive, equitable and vibrant city for all regardless of ability. The City of St. Louis Park invites our community to learn more about disabilities and explore ways to incorporate accessibility in our daily lives. Financial or budget considerations: None. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to being an inclusive, equitable and vibrant city where everyone feels safe and experiences a strong sense of belonging. Supporting documents: Resource Page, proclamation Prepared by: Jocelyn I Hernandez Guitron, racial equity and inclusion specialist Reviewed by: Cheyenne Brodeen, administrative services director Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manger City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 3a) Page 2 Title: Proclamation observing National Disability Independence Day Resource page In recognition of National Disability Independence Day, the City of St. Louis Park invites you to:  • Understand what life is like for people with disabilities: • Disability Impacts All of Us Infographic | Disability and Health | CDC • The Needs Of People With Disabilities - National Disability Institute • People with Disabilities | NAMI • What to Know and Do about Ongoing Changes to U.S. Disability Law and Policy — HPOD • Find ways to increase accessibility in your everyday life • Everyday accessibility tips for the workplace | Campus Accessibility | University of Waterloo • How to Help Employees With Disabilities Thrive | The Way We Work, a TED series • 5 ‘Accessibility Features’ You Use Every Day (Without Realizing It) | by Adriana | Medium City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 3a) Page 3 Title: Proclamation observing National Disability Independence Day Proclamation Observing “National Disability Independence Day” Whereas, this month marks the anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the 1990 law that codified civil rights and access for disabled Americans; and Whereas, the acknowledgement of disability and access requirements has allowed increased independence for those with disabilities because the ADA enforces their rights to full participation in society; and Whereas, approximately 27% of the United States population and 52% of the population who are 65 years of age and older have a disability as defined by law; and Whereas, ADA requirements improve daily life for all people through accessible sidewalks, buildings, workplaces and public spaces; and Whereas, despite the ADA, barriers in healthcare, employment, transportation and social attitudes continue to limit full access and recent federal actions threaten essential supports; and Whereas, disabilities impact the lives of individuals and families in complex ways, often involving navigation through stigma, legal challenges, benefit systems and continued advocacy for accommodations; and Whereas, National Disability Independence Day celebrates the significance of the ADA, encourages all residents to see disability and work to ensure every person can access and enjoy life in the Park, regardless of ability; and Now therefore, let it be known that the mayor and city council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, hereby honor July 26, 2026 as National Disability Independence Day in our community. Wherefore, I set my hand and cause the Great Seal of the City of St. Louis Park to be affixed this 6th day of July, 2026. _________________________________ Nadia Mohamed, mayor Meeting: City council Meeting date: July 6, 2026 Presentation: 3b Executive summary Title: Recognition of donations Recommended action: Mayor announce and express appreciation for the following donations to the city and listed on the consent agenda. From Donation For Lighthouse Management Group, Inc. $2,800 Donation for a memorial bench in Westwood Hills Nature Center honoring Monique Yenamandra. Joe and Jill Bollettieri $2,800 Donation for a memorial bench in Westwood Hills Nature Center honoring 30 years of marriage. Premium Waters $130 Donation of water and dispensers for the annual fire department open house Jonny Pops $750 Donation of popsicles for the annual fire department open house Lindstrom Restoration N/A Donation of used furniture for burn room demonstrations at the annual fire department open house Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to being a city that delivers reliable services, uses city resources responsibly, operates transparently and builds strong relationships with residents. Supporting documents: None. Prepared by: Amanda Scott-Lerdal, deputy city clerk Reviewed by: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager Meeting: City council Meeting date: July 6, 2026 Minutes: 4a Unofficial minutes Study session St. Louis Park, Minnesota June 8, 2026 The meeting convened at 6:03 p.m. Council Members present: Daniel Bashore, Jim Engelking, Sue Budd, Tim Brausen, Yolanda Farris, Paul Baudhuin, Mayor Nadia Mohamed Council Members absent: none Staff present: city manager (Ms. Keller), community engagement coordinator (Mr. Coleman), sustainability manager (Ms. Ziring) Environment & Sustainability Commissioners: Jessie Hendrix, chair; Bennett Myhran, vice-chair; Avital Krebs, youth member; Sasha Shahidi; Natalie Wagner Discussion Items 1. Environment and Sustainability Commission annual meeting with council Mr. Coleman introduced Ms. Hendrix and the commission members in attendance. Ms. Hendrix presented the Environment & Sustainability Commission (ESC) 2025 work plan accomplishments. The commission supported the Climate Action Plan update by reviewing three sections in collaboration with Ms. Ziring. The ESC supported the Electric Vehicle Petting Zoo event, which allowed residents to interact with EV owners and learn about ownership experiences. The commission met several times with the solid waste division to discuss barriers to participation in the curbside organics program and contributed to developing a mailer targeting non- participating households. Youth commissioners tabled at elementary school open houses alongside city staff, running eco-friendly craft activities for children while parents engaged with staff on topics such as home electrification. The commission also supported promotion of the “MVTree” contest and commission members volunteered to serve on the scoring committee. One member conducted research into alternative options for wood waste disposal, though no cost-effective solution had been identified. All commission members participated in the Vision 4.0 process. Council Member Budd asked for participation numbers from the “MVTree” contest. Ms. Ziring confirmed the contest received many submissions and that a commission member served on the review committee; she would retrieve specific participation figures. City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 4a) Page 2 Title: Study session meeting minutes of June 8, 2026 Council Member Bashore asked whether the campaign would be annual. Ms. Ziring indicated the intent was to hold it approximately every five years, given the slow rate at which tree canopy changes. Ms. Hendrix presented the ESC’s commission approved 2026 work plan. The Climate Action Plan update would continue with the commission's most intensive review occurring through the remainder of 2026. Ms. Ziring clarified that a consultant would be engaged in 2027 to assist with calculations and authoring, with the goal of bringing the updated Climate Action Plan to council in 2027 or 2028. The commission identified two work plan items for which it sought council direction: a project or policy on which the council desired broader ESC input, and a research topic the commission could investigate independently and report on to inform future council decisions. Ms. Hendrix requested that council provide direction by the end of summer to allow adequate time for the commission to produce substantive work. Additional 2026 activities included co-hosting the “Walk the Park” event at Louisiana Oaks Park on July 11, 2026. Natural resources staff plan to participate to highlight sustainability efforts at the park. The ESC also launched a list of youth volunteer opportunities tied to sustainability efforts, designed to help students fulfill school or honor society service hour requirements. Finally, the commission would assist with stewardship of the food forest at Ainsworth Park, where approximately a dozen fruit trees were planted in 2024. The commission received a tree pruning lesson in April 2026. They also planned a volunteer event for July 11, 2026, following the “Walk the Park” event, to begin buckthorn removal near the fence line in preparation for further planting. Council Member Farris asked to be notified of the Ainsworth Park volunteer event date so that she could help engage nearby residents and youth. Ms. Ziring confirmed that postcards would be sent to surrounding apartment buildings approximately two weeks prior to the event. Council Member Budd noted that a new neighborhood group has formed in the Oak Park neighborhood and committed to sharing event information with them. Council Member Baudhuin expressed appreciation for the ESC's approach to engaging youth commissioners. He asked whether council direction needed to take place in a study session or could be shared informally. Ms. Keller indicated that the appropriate process depended on scope — straightforward items could proceed with informal consensus, while larger cross- departmental efforts would warrant additional staff involvement. Council Member Baudhuin requested that staff send a reminder to council members in late July 2026 to prompt ideas for commission direction. Council Member Brausen emphasized the importance of the Climate Action Plan update and noted that the city was not on track to meet its 2030 goals. He expressed interest in identifying where the greatest carbon reduction opportunities exist and how funding set aside in the prior year's budget for environmental programs was being deployed. He also raised school composting as a topic of continued interest. City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 4a) Page 3 Title: Study session meeting minutes of June 8, 2026 Council Member Bashore expressed support for continuing work on the Climate Action Plan. He suggested the ESC conduct an assessment of existing city sustainability programs — including the curbside organics program, Rainwater Rewards, tree sales and energy incentive programs — to evaluate utilization levels and identify opportunities for improvement, expansion or more targeted outreach. Council Member Budd noted that a summary of programs funded through the Climate Investment Fund was presented at the study session on May 18, 2026. Ms. Ziring confirmed that report did not cover every sustainability program; it focused specifically on city cost sharing incentive program expenditures paid from the climate investment fund. Ms. Ziring added that she provides the ESC quarterly updates on program participation numbers. Council Member Budd suggested the ESC could add value by recommending strategies to grow underutilized programs. Council Member Bashore agreed emphasizing outreach for programs such as organics recycling. Council Member Engelking thanked the commission for its work. He suggested exploring a "project in a box" concept through which neighborhood associations could use city-provided equipment to undertake self-contained sustainability projects such as buckthorn removal. Ms. Hendrix noted that the city's new adopt-a-plot program, which allows groups to take responsibility for smaller naturalized spaces, could serve as a vehicle for that type of engagement. Council Member Engelking also suggested that underutilized space at passive parks, such as Jackley Park in the Brookside neighborhood, could be considered for community gardens or native pollinator plantings, potentially connected to neighborhood food shelf donation efforts. He further suggested the ESC explore ways to promote and generate excitement around the upcoming light rail opening to encourage first-time ridership. Council Member Baudhuin asked whether the Climate Action Plan update would include an analysis of why the 2030 goals would not be met and what barriers existed. Ms. Ziring confirmed that the updated plan would include a staff narrative addressing current status and modifications to strategies. She noted that progress had been limited primarily by voluntary participation from property owners, as the city has little regulatory authority over private decisions. She added that greenhouse gas emissions have decreased by approximately 25% since 2017. Council Member Baudhuin expressed interest in identifying whether any council-level actions could remove barriers or strengthen incentives. Council Member Budd noted that the Rainwater Rewards program was oversubscribed — with a lottery due to high demand — and suggested that model of engagement could inform other programs. City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 4a) Page 4 Title: Study session meeting minutes of June 8, 2026 Council Member Budd asked whether the ESC could take on a research project examining the waste implications of incinerator closure discussions, given concerns that reducing incineration without increasing composting or recycling would simply result in more waste being transported elsewhere. Ms. Ziring indicated she would defer to solid waste colleagues and Hennepin County staff, who had likely already conducted relevant research, and committed to following up with public works staff. Mayor Mohamed reflected that the ESC's alignment with the city's climate leadership strategic priority made it a natural and efficient resource for council direction. She supported allowing council members to formulate ideas until the end of summer. She asked staff to vet submitted ideas before passing them to the commission, out of respect for volunteer time. Ms. Keller committed to taking the ideas discussed, sorting them by complexity and cross- departmental scope, and developing an appropriate path forward for each. Ms. Hendrix closed by reiterating the commission's willingness to serve as an ongoing resource to council beyond the formal annual work plan cycle. 2. Consider study session topic proposal: council ambassador program for advisory boards and commissions Mr. Coleman gave the staff presentation. He noted the council ambassador program originated approximately one year prior as a council liaison concept, was set aside, and was subsequently revisited by a small work group consisting of Council Members Brausen, Budd and Bashore along with staff liaisons. Council Member Budd summarized the program's purpose: to strengthen communication and support between the council and advisory boards in both directions. She described the core commitment as attending up to two commission meetings per year and serving as a communication channel. Ms. Keller framed three questions for council: whether to implement the program, whether to implement it as described in the report, and how to assign council members to commissions. Council Member Bashore noted that commissions had consistently expressed a desire for more council-driven ideas and direction, and that existing communication mechanisms — annual check-ins and ad hoc contact forms — had not fully addressed that need. He described the ambassador program as an effort to keep communication more active and to better utilize commissions in their advisory capacity. Council Member Baudhuin asked for clarification on the program structure. Council Member Brausen explained that one council member would be associated with each of the five advisory boards or commissions and would attend one to two meetings per year for that assigned body. Mayor Mohamed expressed support for the concept but raised concerns about the potential for workload imbalance among council members, particularly if some members had greater scheduling constraints. She noted that the prior discussion had contemplated exempting the City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 4a) Page 5 Title: Study session meeting minutes of June 8, 2026 mayor from participation given existing responsibilities. She also raised the question of what precedent the program would set for future councils. Council Member Brausen confirmed the intent was to evaluate the program after one year and that it was not intended to be permanent without review. Council Member Budd acknowledged the legal limitations on requiring council member participation and suggested the program be framed as a norm or expectation included in onboarding materials for future council members. Ms. Keller noted that the city had limited ability to mandate attendance but that onboarding guidance and norms could set clear expectations. Council Member Baudhuin expressed full support for the program, citing his longstanding interest in more direct communication between council and commissions. He compared the concept to committee assignments common on school boards and suggested the council approach it as a team, covering for one another when scheduling conflicts arose. Council Member Farris agreed the concept was strong but noted her own current capacity constraints, expressing openness to participating in a future cycle. Council Member Bashore suggested that if a council member was unable to cover their assigned commission in a given instance, another council member could fill in voluntarily. The council discussed the communication reporting structure. Council Member Bashore had proposed a standing agenda item at study sessions for ambassadors to briefly report back to the full council. Mayor Mohamed suggested that updates could instead flow through staff or be included in before-the-weekend communications. Council Member Brausen noted that a standing agenda item would be redundant with existing commission minutes and would add staff workload. Ms. Keller suggested that any standing agenda item be coordinated with the staff liaison in advance and that a time cap of approximately ten minutes per report be considered to manage meeting length. The council also discussed the exit survey component of the program. It was agreed that a survey — rather than a formal exit interview — would be the appropriate tool for gathering feedback from departing commission members. Ms. Keller asked council to confirm their preference for the survey approach, and consensus was reached. The council agreed to proceed with the program. Mr. Coleman noted that the initial assignment process would be interest-based and that staff would send a before-the-weekend communication asking council members to submit ranked preferences. Ms. Keller confirmed the communication would go out shortly. Relevant scheduling information was noted: the Police Advisory Commission, the Racial Equity and Inclusion Commission, the Environment and Sustainability Commission and the Community Technology Advisory Commission all meet on Wednesdays; the Human Rights Commission meets on Tuesdays. City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 4a) Page 6 Title: Study session meeting minutes of June 8, 2026 Written Reports 3. Rainwater Rewards Program overview 4. Environmental impacts of drive-throughs Council Member Brausen noted appreciation for the report. Council Member Budd expressed surprise at the volume of drive-through facilities in the city. Council Member Baudhuin expressed interest in exploring a future requirement for businesses with drive-throughs to post signage encouraging customers to turn off their engines while waiting, noting the potential benefit for both air quality and employee health. He suggested the concept could be connected to the city's existing idle-free policy framework. 5. Emerald Ash Borer update 6. Annual Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program Council Member Budd asked about outcomes and participation data from the citizens monitoring program (CAMP) component of the Annual Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program, noting the existence of a promotional video for the program. Ms. Keller committed to obtaining that information and providing it to Council Member Budd. The meeting adjourned at 7:13 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Nadia Mohamed, mayor These minutes were created with the assistance of a generative AI transcript service, then edited and finalized by a city staff person. Meeting: City council Meeting date: July 6, 2026 Minutes: 4b Unofficial minutes City council meeting St. Louis Park, Minnesota June 15, 2026 1. Call to order. Mayor Mohamed called the meeting to order at 6:15 p.m. a. Pledge of Allegiance. b. Roll call. Council members present: Daniel Bashore, Jim Engelking, Sue Budd, Tim Brausen, Paul Baudhuin, Yolanda Farris, Mayor Nadia Mohamed Council members absent: none Staff present: city manager (Ms. Keller), city attorney (Mr. Mattick), communications and technology director (Ms. Smith), deputy city clerk (Ms. Scott-Lerdal) 2. Approve agenda. It was moved by Council Member Farris, seconded by Council Member Budd, to approve the agenda as presented. The motion passed 6-0 (Council Member Brausen abstained). 3. Presentations. a. Proclamation observing World Refugee Day Council Member Budd read the proclamation designating June 20, 2026 as World Refugee Day in St. Louis Park. The proclamation recognized Minnesota's history of refugee resettlement, averaging approximately 2,000 refugees per year over 45 years, and acknowledged the contributions of refugees to the state and city. Council Member Budd encouraged residents to review the agenda packet resources, including a report from the International Rescue Committee on the impact of current federal administration policies on refugees. Council Member Baudhuin noted that the proclamation could not enumerate all refugee contributions but emphasized that refugees have served as community leaders at the highest levels, including as mayor of St. Louis Park, and expressed pride in that representation. Mayor Mohamed affirmed the importance of highlighting refugee contributions given current federal scrutiny and thanked Council Member Budd for reading the proclamation. City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 4b) Page 2 Title: City council meeting minutes of June 15, 2026 b. Proclamation observing Juneteenth Council Member Farris read the proclamation observing Juneteenth 2026, which recognizes June 19, 1865 as the date that news of the Emancipation Proclamation reached Galveston, Texas. The proclamation further acknowledged the ongoing contributions of Black Americans to Minnesota and noted that St. Louis Park has observed Juneteenth since 2022. The city’s 2026 celebration series will be held in partnership with St. Louis Park Community Education. Council Member Farris remarked that the persistence of racism in 2026 is disheartening and that a proclamation carries no weight without the work to back it up. c. Proclamation observing National Language Access Week Council Member Engelking read the proclamation observing National Language Access Week, noting that 49 distinct languages are spoken within the city. The top non-English languages in St. Louis Park public schools include Spanish, Somali, Tibetan, French and Oromo. The proclamation recognized Minnesota's multilingual heritage beginning with Anishinaabe and Dakota languages. Council Member Engelking observed that immigration and multilingualism have always defined the nation and contribute to the strength of the community. Mayor Mohamed shared a personal account of serving as a childhood interpreter for her parents at medical appointments, emphasizing why language access matters for families and why the burden should not fall on children. Council Member Baudhuin highlighted the proclamation’s acknowledgment of indigenous languages and the connection between language and culture, noting historical efforts to erase indigenous languages through forced assimilation. d. Recognition of donations Mayor Mohamed recognized a $4,000 donation from American Legion Post 282 through Community Charities of Minnesota to the Police Department's K9 program. Dick Brammer, Post 282 Commander, addressed the council. He noted that Post 282 donated approximately $200,000 through gambling proceeds to the city and veterans the prior year and that the post donates to the K9 program on a recurring basis. He noted these donations currently go to support for K9 Officers Maverick and Rollo. 4. Minutes. a. City council meeting minutes of June 1, 2026 b. Special study session meeting minutes of June 1, 2026 It was moved by Council Member Budd, seconded by Council Member Baudhuin, to approve the city council and special study session meeting minutes of June 1, 2026, as presented. City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 4b) Page 3 Title: City council meeting minutes of June 15, 2026 The motion passed 7-0. 5. Consent items. a. Resolution No. 26-086 accepting donations to the city to support police department K9 program b. Resolution No. 26-087 appointing election workers for the August 11, 2026 State Primary election c. Approve boards and commissions appointments d. Resolution No. 26-088 authorizing application for fiscal year 2026 Assistance to Firefighters grant e. Resolution No. 26-089 supporting the City of St. Louis Park as a 2026-2027 Minnesota GreenCorps member host site f. Resolution No. 26-090 authorizing parking restrictions on south side of Oxford Street east of Louisiana Avenue - Ward 2 g. Approve first amendment to shared parking agreement at Inglewood Avenue South - Ward 1 h. Resolution No. 26-091 authorizing application to the Metropolitan Council Regional Solicitation for Transportation Projects Council Member Budd commented on item 5b, noting the significant number of election workers who have committed to staffing the state primary election on Aug. 11, 2026. Each election worker completes two to six hours of training in preparation. Council Member Engelking observed that item 5f implements parking restrictions on Oxford Street near the new Louisiana transit station in anticipation of increased traffic when light rail service begins in 2027. The parking restrictions improve sight lines for large commercial vehicles entering and exiting the adjacent industrial area. It was moved by Council Member Brausen, seconded by Council Member Baudhuin, to move consent item 5c to regular business as item 7b; to approve the consent items as amended, and to waive reading of all resolutions and ordinances. The motion passed 7-0. 6. Public hearing. a. Public hearing for new liquor license - Create Restaurants MN LLC dba Hazelwood Food and Drink Ms. Scott-Lerdal presented the staff report on the new liquor license application. Mayor Mohamed opened the public hearing. No members of the public offered testimony. Mayor Mohamed closed the public hearing. City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 4b) Page 4 Title: City council meeting minutes of June 15, 2026 It was moved by Council Member Brausen, seconded by Council Member Farris, to approve the on-sale intoxicating liquor license with Sunday sales for Create Restaurants Minnesota LLC dba Hazelwood Food and Drink. The motion passed 7-0. 7. Regular business. a. First reading of ordinance amending Chapter 3 of the city code related to temporary liquor licenses Ms. Scott-Lerdal presented the staff report. The proposed ordinance amendment to Chapter 3 of the city code would align with Minnesota State Statute 340A.404, subdivision 10c, which allows temporary liquor licenses to be issued to brewers and microdistillers. City code currently limits the issuance of temporary on-sale intoxicating liquor licenses to clubs, charitable, religious or nonprofit organizations. Three breweries and two microdistilleries operate in St. Louis Park; an owner representing all five establishments requested the amendment. Council Member Brausen asked whether the amendment would allow a brewery to bring in spirits in addition to other beers. Ms. Scott-Lerdal confirmed that an on-sale intoxicating temporary liquor license covers the full range from 3.2 alcohol through hard liquor. Council Member Brausen expressed support, noting it aligns city code with state law and removes an unnecessary restriction on local businesses. Council Member Baudhuin expressed support, stating there is no reason for city ordinances to differ from state statutes unless specific local values require it. He noted that regulations around distilleries and breweries are still evolving and credited the business owners for proactively bringing the issue forward. Council Member Engelking noted that four of the five establishments are located in Ward 2 and credited the owners of The Dampfwerk Distillery, who were present, for organizing all five establishments to bring the request forward. He highlighted the economic benefit of allowing these businesses to host events such as small wedding receptions that draw visitors from outside the city. It was moved by Council Member Engelking, seconded by Council Member Baudhuin, to approve the first reading of the ordinance amending Chapter 3 of the city code related to temporary liquor licenses and to schedule the second reading for July 6, 2026. The motion passed 7-0. b. Approve boards and commissions appointments Council Member Brausen stated he wanted to recognize the appointments to the city’s boards and commissions with additional context and read all appointments into the record. He described how 71 residents had applied for 38 available seats across multiple boards and City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 4b) Page 5 Title: City council meeting minutes of June 15, 2026 commissions. Four nights of interviews were conducted by council members and existing commission members. Council Member Brausen thanked his colleagues, particularly Council Member Budd, for participating in four nights of interviews, and read the appointments into the record as follows: Benjamin Straus, Edward Bulliner, Lindsay Keogh, Asha Murugesan and Elsa Anderson were appointed to the Community Technology Advisory Commission. Jose Nieves Soto was appointed to the Housing Authority. Derek Reise, Natalie Wagner, Rebecca Asheim Keller, Rebecca Evan, Avery Kuehl and Addison Martin were appointed to the Environment and Sustainability Commission. Bruce Cantor, David Yakes, Jay Jaffee, Nouk Yang, Rachel Snee, Stella Schlegelmilch and Adrienne Krill were appointed to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission. Thomas Weber, Christopher Caton and Avi Nieves were appointed to the Planning Commission/Board of zoning appeals. Robert Tift was appointed to the Fire Civil Service. Jackie Kay, Lee Conliffe, Isabel Anderson, Katie Story, Brenda C. Morales, Akilah Anderson and Tess Culp were appointed to the Human Rights Commission. Anthony Del Percio, Tommy Hines, Mike Rydberg, Derek Fradenburgh, Rachel Nieves and Ranae Brusch were appointed to the Police Advisory Commission. Council Member Baudhuin thanked Council Member Brausen for his decision to recognize the appointees publicly. He noted the difficulty of the selection process given the high quality of all applicants and highlighted the growing number of youth applicants as an encouraging trend. Council Member Engelking congratulated the new board and commission members present in the audience. Council Member Bashore thanked all 71 applicants, acknowledged the importance of advisory roles, noted that many current council members began their public service on boards and commissions and encouraged those not appointed to reapply in future cycles or pursue other volunteer opportunities with the city. Mayor Mohamed thanked the appointees for continuing to engage with the city during a particularly difficult period and expressed that their commitment carried special meaning. It was moved by Council Member Brausen, seconded by Council Member Budd, to approve the boards and commissions appointments as presented. The motion passed 7-0. City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 4b) Page 6 Title: City council meeting minutes of June 15, 2026 8. Communications and announcements. a. Potential LAWCON property transfer and purchase of Webster Park - Ward 1 Mayor Mohamed noted that staff sought direction from the council on whether to schedule a study session or allow staff to continue pursuing the opportunity and return at a later date. The city council expressed confidence in staff's judgment to proceed without a study session. b. Climate Leadership and Natural Spaces system wrap-up Council Member Budd acknowledged the breadth of the Climate Leadership and Natural Spaces System wrap-up materials and recognized staff for their work. She noted that the absence of council questions or comments on many items reflects trust in and appreciation for the work, not inattention. Several announcements were shared: The Fire Department open house is scheduled for Tuesday, June 16, 2026, at 4:30 p.m. at Fire Station 1. Basketball in the Park begins Thursday, June 18, 2026, at Ainsworth Park from 6:00 to 8:00 p.m. featuring youth play alongside St. Louis Park Police and Hennepin County Sheriffs. Parktacular, the city's annual summer festival, takes place the weekend of June 20, 2026. The Grand Day parade is Saturday at noon along 40th Street and ending at the Recreation Outdoor Center (ROC). STEP is holding a ribbon cutting for its new facility expansion on Thursday, June 19, 2026 at 4:30 p.m. followed by a community block party at 5:00 p.m. STEP, in collaboration with St. Louis Park School District, is distributing food to youth throughout the summer every Monday midday at Ainsworth Park and every Friday with a weekend food pack. Mayor Mohamed asked how families could access the program. Council Member Engelking confirmed that families simply need to show up at the park. Mayor Mohamed highlighted several Juneteenth Celebration events: • A family movie night screening of “Soul” at Lenox Community Center on June 15, 2026, from 6:00 to 7:30 p.m. • A Black Storyteller Alliance event at St. Louis Park Library on June 16, 2026, from 6:30 to 7:30 p.m. • A summer concert series kickoff featuring Soul Flower at the amphitheater on June 17, 2026, from 7:00 to 8:30 p.m. • A Juneteenth skate at the ROC on June 18, 2026, from 5:30 to 8:00 p.m. Ms. Keller noted that the council will recess for two weeks and reconvene after the July 4th holiday on July 6, 2026. City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 4b) Page 7 Title: City council meeting minutes of June 15, 2026 9. Adjournment. The meeting adjourned at 7:05 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Nadia Mohamed, mayor These minutes were created with the assistance of a generative AI transcript service, then edited and finalized by a city staff person. Meeting: City council Meeting date: July 6, 2026 Minutes: 4c Unofficial minutes Closed executive session St. Louis Park, Minnesota June 15, 2026 Mayor Mohamed called the closed executive session to order at 7:10 p.m. Council members present: Mayor Nadia Mohamed, Daniel Bashore, Jim Engelking, Sue Budd, Tim Brausen, Yolanda Farris, Paul Baudhuin Council members absent: none. Staff present: City manager (Ms. Keller), fire chief (Mr. Hanlin), police chief (Mr. Kruelle), administrative services director (Ms. Brodeen), communications and technology director (Ms. Smith), city attorney (Mr. Mattick) Guests: Bob McNaney, the McNaney Group; Greg Hayes, Hayes Consulting LLC The city council met in closed executive session to participate in a table-top exercise related to emergency management. The meeting was closed pursuant to Minnesota Statute 13D.05, subd. 3(d) to participate in a facilitated emergency management exercise led by Mr. McNaney and Mr. Hayes. The exercise addressed roles in an emergency; procedures and plans to protect public buildings and infrastructure, emergency response procedures, and recommendations regarding public services, infrastructure and facilities. Disclosure of the information discussed would pose a danger to public safety or compromise security procedures or responses. The city council exited the closed session at 9:05 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Nadia Mohamed, mayor Meeting: City council Meeting date: July 6, 2026 Consent agenda item: 5a Executive summary Title: Approve city disbursements Recommended action: Motion to approve city disbursement claims for the period of May 27 through June 29, 2026. Policy consideration: Does the city council approve city disbursements for the period ending June 29, 2026? Summary: The finance department prepares this report monthly for the city council to review and approve. The attached report shows both city disbursements paid by physical check and those by wire transfer or Automated Clearing House (ACH) when applicable. Financial or budget considerations: Review and approval of the information by council is required by the city charter and provides another layer of oversight to further ensure fiscal stewardship. Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: Disbursement summary Prepared by: Estela Mulugeta, accounting specialist Reviewed by: Joe Olson, deputy finance director Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 6/29/20265/27/2026 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 1,160.003CMAComm & Marketing G&A Dues, Memberships, Licenses 1,160.00 257.90A-1 OUTDOOR POWER INC General Fund BS Inventory 222.31Water G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 480.21 84.35ABDELALL KHALED Water G&A 84.35 23.85ABERNATHY, LISA Organized Rec G&A Employee Mileage Reimbursement 23.85 28,930.02ACCELA INC Software G&A Software Licensing Less 12 Mo 28,930.02 13,086.00ADVANCED ENG & ENVIRONMENTAL SRVCS Water G&A 426.00Sewer G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 13,512.00 556.26AFFELDT ZACH Water G&A 556.26 300.00ALBERTSSON HANSEN ARCHITECTURE LTD Housing Rehab G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 300.00 311.50ALCANTARA STANIKKA Police G&A In-State Travel 311.50 9,230.00ALLIANCE MECH SRVCS INC Facilties Maintenance G&A Repairs and Maintenance 9,230.00 925.55ALLIED BLACKTOP Public Works G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 925.55 3,500.00ALOUL KHAL General Fund BS UNION PARK APTS 3,500.00 1,273.83ALTEC INDUSTRIES INC Vehicle Maintenance G&A Repairs and Maintenance 1,273.83 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 2 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 6/29/20265/27/2026 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 8.53AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES Organized Rec G&A Admin/Office Supplies & Mat 8.53 200.00AMERICAN CITY BUSINESS JOURNALS Assessing G&A Dues, Memberships, Licenses 200.00 17.95ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS Fire Department G&A Repairs and Maintenance 17.95 120.00ANDERSON LUKE Police G&A In-State Travel 120.00 501.00APOLLO MEDICAL TRAINING Police G&A Other Travel, Conv & Conf 501.00 2,751.25AQUA LOGIC INC Aquatic Division G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 2,751.25 339.92ARC DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS, LLC Technology G&A Short Term Lease/Rentals Pay 339.92 1,083.89ASCENTEK INC General Fund BS Inventory 505.24Vehicle Maintenance G&A Vehicle Fuels 1,589.13 138.00ASL INTERPRETING SERVICES INC Engineering G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 138.00 1,673.41ASPEN MILLS Fire Department G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 1,673.41 530.00AT&T Police G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 530.00 407.30AUTOZONE STORES LLC General Fund BS Inventory 407.30 95.96BAHE EVERETTE Water G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 95.96 123.00BALVIN, AARON Police G&A In-State Travel City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 3 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 6/29/20265/27/2026 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 123.00 5,160.13BANG ELECTRIC Facilties Maintenance G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 5,160.13 333.77BANKEN CHRISTOPHER Water G&A 333.77 200.00BARGHINI CORY General Fund BS UNION PARK APTS 200.00 120.00BARNES, PAUL Police G&A In-State Travel 120.00 150.14BAUMAN STEPHEN Water G&A 150.14 100.00BEAL JILL Organized Rec G&A 100.00 900.00BEITO BOE General Fund BS UNION PARK APTS 900.00 222.34BERRY COFFEE COMPANY Aquatic Division G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 222.34 1,500.00BIEL REUBEN Climate Investment G&A 1,500.00 237.90BINDER HEATING AND AIR, INC.Building and Energy G&A 237.90 85.00BLUE WATER PLUMBING AND HEATING Building and Energy G&A 85.00 4,405.50BOLTON & MENK INC Storm Water Utility G&A 4,405.50 1,500.00BONGAARTS JOANNE Climate Investment G&A 1,500.00 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 4 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 6/29/20265/27/2026 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 1,047.67BOUND TREE MEDICAL, LLC Fire Department G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 1,047.67 270.00BRISSON MILAENA Aquatic Division G&A Refunds/Reimbursements 270.00 13,360.00BROTHERS UNDERGROUND Sewer G&A Repairs and Maintenance 13,360.00 30.44BUILDING CONTROLS & SOLUTIONS Facilties Maintenance G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 6.15Facilties Maintenance G&A Repairs, Maint, Serv on Tech 610.40Water G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 646.99 1,620.00BUOL JUSTIN Climate Investment G&A 1,620.00 69.75BURGMEIER ANDREW Water G&A 69.75 993.54BUSINESS ESSENTIALS Comm & Marketing G&A Admin/Office Supplies & Mat 993.54 13,380.00CALYPTUS CONSULTING GROUP INC REI G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 13,380.00 874.62CANADAY KYLE Water G&A 874.62 3,848.00CANON FINANCIAL Technology G&A Short Term Lease/Rentals Pay 3,848.00 1,187.20CAR WASH PARTNERS, INC.Vehicle Maintenance G&A Repairs and Maintenance 1,187.20 19.00CATHERS BRANDON Public Works G&A Dues, Memberships, Licenses 19.00 344.80CDW GOVERNMENT INC Technology G&A Technology Supplies 4,666.33Technology G&A Capitalized Tech Hardware 5,011.13 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 5 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 6/29/20265/27/2026 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 114,012.50CENTER FOR ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT Affordable H Trust G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 825.00Housing Rehab G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 114,837.50 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 13,571.87 3,845.39 3,522.91 228.953 22.765,2 37.40 Heating Gas Utility Heating Gas Utility Heating Gas Utility Heating Gas Utility Heating Gas Utility Facilties Maintenance G&A Water G&A Water Reilly G&A Sewer G&A Park Maintenance G&A 16,142.50CENTRAL PENSION FUND Employee Benefits BS OTHER RETIREMENT 16,142.50 161.61CENTRALSQUARE TECHNOLOGIES Police G&A Software Licensing Less 12 Mo 161.61 326.78CENTURY LINK Technology G&A Other Communications 326.78 12.54CHAMBERLAIN LAURA Community Development G&A Employee Mileage Reimbursement 12.54 26.10CHAMPOUX KATELYN Community Development G&A Employee Mileage Reimbursement 26.10 3,000.00CHRISTY TERRI Climate Investment G&A 3,000.00 78.54CIARDELLI GERALD Water G&A 78.54 8.71CINTAS CORPORATION Facilties Maintenance G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 233.40Facilties Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 90.79Public Works G&A Admin/Office Supplies & Mat 42.03Public Works G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 243.42Water G&A Admin/Office Supplies & Mat 169.27Water G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 62.24Park Maintenance G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 6 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 6/29/20265/27/2026 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 364.02Park Maintenance G&A Admin/Office Supplies & Mat 578.05Park Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 231.70Rec Center Gen Division G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 63.00Aquatic Division G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 21.00Aquatic Division G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 124.35Vehicle Maintenance G&A Admin/Office Supplies & Mat 158.97Vehicle Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 2,390.95 20.00CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Human Resources G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 20.00 6,921.20CITY OF BLOOMINGTON Water G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 6,921.20 1,335.99CITY OF SAINT PAUL Public Works G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 1,335.99 21,475.00CITY OF SLP HA-KIDS IN THE PARK Affordable H Trust G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 21,475.00 50.03CLARKE LISA Assessing G&A Employee Mileage Reimbursement 50.03 124.70CLOONAN LESLIE Water G&A 124.70 381.36COLE PAPERS Facilties Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 381.36 23,543.49COLICH & ASSOCIATES City Clerk's Office G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 23,543.49 121.93COMCASTFire Department G&A Electric Utility 195.78Technology G&A Other Communications 30.03Rec Center Gen Division G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 347.74 31,123.54COMPASS MINERALS AMERICA Public Works G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 31,123.54 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 7 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 6/29/20265/27/2026 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 577.50CONWAY SHIELD Fire Department G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 577.50 464.07CORDES DELORES Water G&A 464.07 7,168.89CORE & MAIN LP Water G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 7,168.89 13,330.00CORPORATE MECHANICAL Rec Center Gen Division G&A Repairs and Maintenance 13,330.00 40.32COUGHLIN ALEXANDRA Water G&A 40.32 734.52CREEKSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION REI G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 734.52 227.56CROWN MARKING INC.Comm & Marketing G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 227.56 119.00CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER Facilties Maintenance G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 119.00 993.57CUMMINS SALES AND SERVICE Water G&A Repairs and Maintenance 1,611.58Rec Center Gen Division G&A Repairs and Maintenance 2,605.15 47.15CUSHMAN MOTOR CO INC General Fund BS Inventory 47.15 599.00DE WOLFE MUSIC Cable TV G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 599.00 199.54DELORME BRYAN Water G&A 199.54 4,117.86DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY Building and Energy G&A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 4,117.86 423.55DEUTSCH LAURIE Water G&A City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 8 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 6/29/20265/27/2026 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 423.55 7.87DEVORE BRADY Water G&A 7.87 50.00DILLON JENNIFER Storm Water Utility G&A 50.00 889.13DO-GOOD.BIZ INC Comm & Marketing G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 22,300.40Comm & Marketing G&A Postage & Delivery 780.21Sustainability G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 54.652026 GO Capital 247.89Franchise Fees G&A 34.33Water G&A 13.28Sewer G&A 4,115.78Solid Waste G&A Postage & Delivery 52.27Storm Water Utility G&A 28,487.94 198.65DOLBY JOSHUA Water G&A 198.65 500.00DONNELLY MARY Water G&A 500.00 384.49DURAND CARLA Water G&A 384.49 777.54ECM PUBLISHERS INC City Clerk's Office G&A Postage & Delivery 777.54 175.63EDEN PRAIRIE POLICE DEPARTMENT Police G&A Other Travel, Conv & Conf 450.00Police G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 625.63 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 464.66 464.66 464.66 464.66 3,750.00 Other Debt Serv Expend Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 2021A G&A Mera Wayzata Project TIF G&A Beltline Residences TIF G&A Wooddale Ave Ap TIF G&A Texa Tonka TIF G&A City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 9 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 6/29/20265/27/2026 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 464.66Parkway Residual TIF G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 464.66Bridgewater Bank TIF G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 464.66Wooddale Station TIF G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 464.66Duke West End TIF G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 464.66Park Commons TIF G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 464.66Rise on 7 TIF G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 464.65Hwy 7 Business Center TIF G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 11,461.25 2,766.76ENTERPRISE FM TRUST Vehicle Maintenance G&A Short Term Lease/Rentals Pay 2,766.76 120.00ERICKSON JAKE Police G&A In-State Travel 120.00 1,465.00ERICKSON MEGAN Climate Investment G&A 1,465.00 68.98ERICKSON ROBERT Water G&A 68.98 46,700.00ESRISoftware G&A Software Licensing Less 12 Mo 46,700.00 2,398.00ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC Sewer G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 21,729.00Storm Water Utility G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 24,127.00 82.23ESTATE OF JANICE KELLY Water G&A 82.23 37.46EWEN SEAN Water G&A 37.46 2,000.00EZEKIEL COWAN Organized Rec G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 2,000.00 2,077.94FACTORY MOTOR PARTS CO General Fund BS Inventory 15.50Vehicle Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 2,093.44 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 10 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 6/29/20265/27/2026 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 4,670.00FARBER SOUND LLC Rec Center Gen Division G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 4,670.00 1,316.20FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC Water G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 1,316.20 13,558.25FERGUSON WATERWORKS Water G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 13,558.25 12.00FERRELLGASRec Center Gen Division G&A Vehicle Fuels 12.00 225.00FIDELIS SAFETY SOLUTIONS Fire Department G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 225.00 4,390.00FINEPOINT TECHNOLOGY LLC Cable TV G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 4,390.00 104.64FINNEGAN PLAYGROUND ADVENTURES Park Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 104.64 7,538.75FIRE CATT LLC Fire Department G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 7,538.75 78.60FIRST ADVANTAGE Human Resources G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 78.60 311.50FITZHENRY KATIE Police G&A In-State Travel 311.50 100.00FLECK APRIL Westwood G&A 100.00 417.96FREEWHEEL BIKE MINNETONKA Fire Department G&A Repairs and Maintenance 417.96 33.35FRIEDERICH NIKKI Organized Rec G&A Employee Mileage Reimbursement 33.35 89.40GALLAGHER MARIA Water G&A 89.40 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 11 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 6/29/20265/27/2026 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 5,250.00GAMMELL WADE Employee Benefits G&A 5,250.00 57.94GARTH JOHNSON REALTY HOUSE Water G&A 57.94 1,732.06GFL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES USA LLC Park Maintenance G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 1,732.06 853.00GLACIAL RIDGE, INC.Park Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 938.44Natural Resources G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 1,791.44 2,964.00GOERS LAND SURVEYING LLC Franchise Fees G&A 1,596.00Storm Water Utility G&A 4,560.00 3,163.20GOLDEN VALLEY, CITY OF Organized Rec G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 3,163.20 16,085.00GOLIATH HYDRO-VAC INC Sewer G&A Repairs and Maintenance 17,985.00Storm Water Utility G&A 34,070.00 1,336.50GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC Water G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 1,336.50 19,950.00GOVERNMENTJOBS.COM INC Software G&A Software Licensing Less 12 Mo 19,950.00 169.53GRAINGER INC.General Fund BS Inventory 177.87Facilties Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 1,808.58Water G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 2,155.98 48,952.75GRANICUS LLC Software G&A Software Licensing Less 12 Mo 48,952.75 100.00GRAY FRANK AND CYNTHIA Storm Water Utility G&A 100.00 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 12 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 6/29/20265/27/2026 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 203.90GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO Public Works G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 31,075.00Municipal Building & Infra G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 31,278.90 3,539.43GREAT LAKES COCA-COLA DISTRIBUTION Aquatic Division G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 3,539.43 140.77GREENE MARCUS REI G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 140.77 35.00GREENLIGHT FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGY Police G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 35.00 224.03GREGERSON DALE Water G&A 224.03 292.26HACH CO Water G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 292.26 32.50HAGE CONCRETE WORKS Building and Energy G&A 32.50 104.30HAGON JESSE Organized Rec G&A Refunds/Reimbursements 104.30 95.00HALL, JAY Water G&A Other Travel, Conv & Conf 95.00 425.53HALLEEN TONI Water G&A 425.53 2,960.00HAMMEL GREEN & ABRAHAMSON INC Aquatic Division G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 2,960.00 105.41HANCOCK LANCE Water G&A 105.41 50,964.57HAWKINS INC Water G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 5,197.40Aquatic Division G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 56,161.97 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 13 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 6/29/20265/27/2026 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 2,330.00HEALTHPARTNERS OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE Human Resources G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 2,330.00 667.56HEDBERG HOME Storm Water Utility G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 667.56 120.00HEFFERNAN SAM Police G&A In-State Travel 120.00 120.00HELLERUD, JORDAN Police G&A In-State Travel 120.00 52.50HENNEPIN COUNTY General Fund G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 6.00Sunset Ridge HIA G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 50.00SSD 1 G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 62.50SSD 2 G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 105.00SSD 4 G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 37.50SSD 5 G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 27.50SSD 6 G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 216.00SA (Cost Recovery) G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 1,185.00Water G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 300.00Sewer G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 2,042.00 9,055.00HENNEPIN COUNTY ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE Police G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 4,796.80Police G&A Radio Communications 941.79Park Maintenance G&A Solid Waste Utility 14,793.59 2,488.34HENNEPIN COUNTY ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE-ACHFire Department G&A Radio Communications 269.82Public Works G&A Radio Communications 269.82Water G&A Radio Communications 269.82Sewer G&A Radio Communications 269.82Storm Water Utility G&A Radio Communications 3,567.62 118.00HERNANDEZ JOCELYN REI G&A Out-of-State Travel 118.00 9,540.00HIGHVIEW PLUMBING INC Sewer G&A Repairs and Maintenance City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 14 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 6/29/20265/27/2026 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 9,540.00 3,000.00HIRASUNA DONALD Climate Investment G&A 3,000.00 2,065.73HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MFG INC Park Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 2,065.73 288.32HOGAN BRIAN Water G&A 288.32 4,324.53HOLT JOSHUA Climate Investment G&A 4,324.53 537.79HOME LEASING & MANAGEMENT Water G&A 537.79 358.85HOME LINE Housing Rehab G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 358.85 692.94HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY Aquatic Division G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 692.94 478.86HPX GROUP LLC Water G&A 478.86 1,680.00I.U.O.E. LOCAL NO 49 Employee Benefits BS UNION DUES 1,680.00 569.21IDEAL SERVICE INC Water G&A Repairs and Maintenance 569.21 896.07IMPACT POWER TO CONNECT Water G&A Postage & Delivery 896.06Sewer G&A Postage & Delivery 896.07Solid Waste G&A Postage & Delivery 896.06Storm Water Utility G&A Postage & Delivery 3,584.26 4,497.65IMPERIAL DADE Facilties Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 4,497.65 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 15 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 6/29/20265/27/2026 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 120.00IMSANDE DEREK Police G&A In-State Travel 120.00 977.79INDELCOWater G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 196.85Park Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 1,174.64 508.29INGCO INTERNATIONAL Comm & Marketing G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 508.29 105.06INGER-LISE LUDVIGSEN $ MICHAEL SANCHEZ Water G&A 105.06 3,975.00INNOVATIVE WOODWORKING SOLUTIONS Fire Department G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 3,975.00 17,175.98-INSITUFORM TECHNOLOGIES USA, LLC Sewer BS RETAINAGE PAYABLE 343,519.56Sewer G&A 326,343.58 6,207.58INSOURCE SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS INC Water G&A Software Licensing Less 12 Mo 6,207.59Sewer G&A Software Licensing Less 12 Mo 12,415.17 683.79INVER GROVE FORD Vehicle Maintenance G&A Repairs and Maintenance 683.79 2,000.00INVOICE CLOUD INC Water G&A Computers/Tech Services 1,417.20Water G&A Misc Expenditures 3,417.20 90.00ISI SPORTS INDUSTRY Rec Center Gen Division G&A Dues, Memberships, Licenses 90.00 85.08ISRAEL ROGER Water G&A 85.08 1,531.27I-STATE TRUCK CENTER General Fund BS Inventory 1,531.27 881.94J. H. LARSON CO.Water G&A Operations Supplies & Mat City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 16 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 6/29/20265/27/2026 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 881.94 1,300.33JAYTECH, INC.Aquatic Division G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 1,300.33 15,998.51JEFFERSON FIRE & SAFETY INC Fire Department G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 15,998.51 311.34JOHNSON PAPER & SUPPLY CO.Facilties Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 4,038.05Rec Center Gen Division G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 4,349.39 131.67JOHNSON SCOTT Water G&A 131.67 36.98JUREK JESSIE Assessing G&A Employee Mileage Reimbursement 36.98 110.02KAISER BERBARD J Water G&A 110.02 225.00KARSTEN SHIRLEY Water G&A 225.00 5,066.48KELLY DANIEL Climate Investment G&A 5,066.48 78.40KEYPRIME INC Building and Energy G&A 78.40 1,325.00KEYSTONE COMPENSATION GROUP LLC Human Resources G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 1,325.00 2,627.00KFI ENGINEERS Municipal Building & Infra G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 2,627.00 790.31KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC Street Capital G&A 46,173.86MSA Capital G&A 1,480.052026 GO Capital 10,150.00Franchise Fees G&A 4,961.36Water G&A City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 17 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 6/29/20265/27/2026 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 772.02Sewer G&A 2,485.90Storm Water Utility G&A 66,813.50 167.42KINGS III EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS LLC Facilties Maintenance G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 167.42 1,484.50KLEIN UNDERGROUND LLC Water G&A Repairs and Maintenance 5,737.50Storm Water Utility G&A Repairs and Maintenance 7,222.00 72.49KNAUS BRITTNI Water G&A 72.49 40.01KOWALCZYK DELMAR Water G&A 40.01 1,843.03KRAEMER MINING & MATERIALS INC Water G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 1,843.03 16,800.00KRAUS-ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION CO Municipal Building & Infra G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 16,800.00 225.09KUCHERA SAMUEL Water G&A 225.09 426.17KUZMINA IRINA Water G&A 426.17 100.00KUZNETSOV BRITTANY Westwood G&A Refunds/Reimbursements 100.00 110.42LADEN'S BUSINESS SOLUTIONS INC General Fund BS Prepaid Expenditures/Expenses 154.58Finance G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 265.00 1,421.53LAKE STATES EVERGREEN COMPANY LLC Natural Resources G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 1,421.53 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 18 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 6/29/20265/27/2026 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 1,428.32LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES INC Police G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 1,428.32 1,000.00LARSEN PHILIP GRANT Climate Investment G&A 1,000.00 4,386.28LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES INC Employee Benefits BS UNION DUES 4,386.28 1,404.74LAWNAGAIN OUTDOOR LLC Park Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 1,404.74 209.26LAWRENCE JOSEPH Fire Department G&A In-State Travel 209.26 2,000.00LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INSURANCE TRUST Property Casualty G&A Property Insurance 2,000.00 350.00LEEPER KEVIN Water G&A 350.00 885.00LEGEND TECHNICAL SERVICES Water Reilly G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 885.00 174.82-LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS LLC IT G&A Telephone Communications 2,112.24Technology G&A Short Term Lease/Rentals Pay 1,937.42 292.50LEWIS, DONALD Police G&A In-State Travel 292.50 666.67LEXISNEXIS RISK SOLUTIONS Police G&A Software Licensing Less 12 Mo 666.67 236.60LIBERTY TIRE Vehicle Maintenance G&A Recycling Utility 236.60 1,501.00LIFE SAFETY SYSTEMS Property Casualty G&A Property Insurance 1,501.00 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 19 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 6/29/20265/27/2026 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 93.60LINDILIEN JANE Water G&A 93.60 1,258.75LOCKGUARD LOCKSMITHS Facilties Maintenance G&A Repairs and Maintenance 1,258.75 1,954.94LOFFLERTechnology G&A Short Term Lease/Rentals Pay 1,954.94 313.02LOFFLER COMPANIES INC Technology G&A Short Term Lease/Rentals Pay 313.02 6,139.59LOGISTechnology G&A Computers/Tech Services 15.00Technology G&A Technology Devices 11,867.00Software G&A Computers/Tech Services 18,021.59 120.00LONDON BRUCE Police G&A In-State Travel 120.00 100.00LOSOYA ALEX Water G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 100.00 50.00LOVELAND JAMES Storm Water Utility G&A 50.00 2,194.00LVC COMPANIES INC Facilties Maintenance G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 6,898.00Rec Center Gen Division G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 9,092.00 206.84M G INCENTIVES Human Resources G&A Admin/Office Supplies & Mat 206.84 60.00MACIAPolice G&A Dues, Memberships, Licenses 60.00 2,492.92MAGNACHARGE BATTERY USA, LLC.General Fund BS Inventory 2,492.92 20,451.99MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY OF GAINSVILLE, INC General Fund BS Inventory 20,451.99 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 20 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 6/29/20265/27/2026 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 1,020.00MARIE RIDGEWAY LICSW LLC Police G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 1,020.00 460.00MARTENS STEVE Building and Energy G&A 460.00 214.14MARTIN JORDI Water G&A 214.14 1,205.57MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS Water G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 6,490.54Water G&A 7,696.11 5.08MCCONNELL, BECKY Westwood G&A Employee Mileage Reimbursement 5.08 483.98MCLAUGHLIN JOANN Water G&A 483.98 180.00MENENDEZ RODRIGO Rec Center Gen Division G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 180.00 13.75METRO 7 PROPERTIES LLC Water G&A 13.75 4,920.30METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Building and Energy G&A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 474,319.79Sewer G&A Water Utility 479,240.09 795.00MID AMERICA BUSINESS SYSTEMS Technology G&A Short Term Lease/Rentals Pay 795.00 21,450.00MIDWEST GROUNDCOVER Park Improvement G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 21,450.00 526.54MIDWEST OVERHEAD CRANE, CORP.Vehicle Maintenance G&A Repairs and Maintenance 526.54 119.58MILLER HANNAH Water G&A 119.58 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 21 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 6/29/20265/27/2026 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 3,244.74MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PYT CTR Employee Benefits BS WAGE GARNISHMENTS 3,244.74 55,033.00MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Water G&A Water Utility 55,033.00 50.00MINNESOTA DEPT. OF HEALTH Facilties Maintenance G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 50.00Rec Center Gen Division G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 100.00 167.81MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT General Fund BS Inventory 167.81 1,445.00MINNESOTA NATIVE LANDSCAPES Natural Resources G&A Repairs and Maintenance 1,445.00 410.85MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY Facilties Maintenance G&A Dues, Memberships, Licenses 410.85 50.00MISKOWIEC MATT Storm Water Utility G&A 50.00 142.00MN FIRE SERVICE CERTIFICATION BOARD Fire Department G&A Other Travel, Conv & Conf 142.00 4,550.00MN TACTICAL OFFICERS ASSOCIATION Police G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 4,550.00 480.00MOBILE PRO SYSTEMS Police G&A Repairs and Maintenance 480.00 440.00MODERN HEATING AND AIR Rec Center Gen Division G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 3,500.00Rec Center Gen Division G&A Repairs and Maintenance 3,940.00 8,240.00MOMENTUM ADVOCACY LLP Adminstrative Operations G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 8,240.00 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 22 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 6/29/20265/27/2026 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 123.00MOORE ISAIAH Police G&A In-State Travel 123.00 170.28MORRIS MICHAEL Water G&A 170.28 44.00MR CUTTING EDGE Rec Center Gen Division G&A Repairs and Maintenance 44.00 88.00MR. ROOTER PLUMBING OF THE TWIN CITIES Building and Energy G&A 88.00 900.00MRUFF STRATEGIES LLC Finance G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 900.00 256.39MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO.General Fund BS Inventory 24.49Water G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 58.76Vehicle Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 339.64 7,614.75MTI DISTRIBUTING CO General Fund BS Inventory 7,614.75 6,410.00MUSIC TOGETHER IN THE VALLEY LLC Organized Rec G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 6,410.00 259.00MVTL LABORATORIES Sewer G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 259.00 8.40NAPA (GENUINE PARTS CO)Vehicle Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 8.40 95.00NELSON JOSHUA Public Works G&A Other Travel, Conv & Conf 95.00 2,875.00NEWPUBLICASustainability G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 2,875.00 706.21NIEBLER BRIAN Water G&A 706.21 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 23 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 6/29/20265/27/2026 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 123.00NORDRUM ERIN Police G&A In-State Travel 123.00 477.60NORTH AMERICAN SAFETY INC Park Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 477.60 40,480.90NORTH COUNTRY CHEVROLET GMC Vehicles & Equipment G&A Vehicles/Machinery Purch 40,480.90 44.20NORTHERN MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS Building and Energy G&A 44.20 182.53NORTHSTAR MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT INC Facilties Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 182.53 14,200.00NORTHWESTERN DOOR CO Water G&A Repairs and Maintenance 14,200.00 185.00NOVACARE REHABILITATION Human Resources G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 185.00 735.00NRPAOrganized Rec G&A Dues, Memberships, Licenses 735.00 6,285.61NYSTROM PUBLISHING Comm & Marketing G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 6,285.61 473.20OAKWOOD PARTNERS Water G&A 473.20 25.38OELRICH JETHRO Assessing G&A Employee Mileage Reimbursement 25.38 1,069.35OFFICE OF MNIT SERVICES Technology G&A Capitalized Tech Software 1,069.35 1,184.09OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE Employee Benefits G&A Misc Expenditures 1,184.09 95.00OKEY MIKE Public Works G&A Other Travel, Conv & Conf City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 24 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 6/29/20265/27/2026 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 95.00 104.80OLD WORK NEW WORLD THEATRE Organized Rec G&A 104.80 80.77OLDENBORG JESSIE Water G&A 80.77 588.94OLEISKY RAYMOND Water G&A 588.94 825.92OLSON-EHLERT KRISTOPHER Fire Department G&A Out-of-State Travel 825.92 764.00ON SITE SANITATION Fire Department G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 75.00Solid Waste G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 8,625.88Organized Rec G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 134.00Park Maintenance G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 338.00Westwood G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 9,936.88 533.80O'REILLY FIRST CALL General Fund BS Inventory 533.80 5.67OSIEMO ALLAN Water G&A 5.67 4,456.00OVERHEAD DOOR COMPANY OF THE NORTHLANDFacilties Maintenance G&A Repairs, Maint, Serv on Tech 7,325.30Property Casualty G&A Property Insurance 11,781.30 438.34OXYGEN SERVICE COMPANY INC Fire Department G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 438.34 15,016.00PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES INC Water Reilly G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 15,016.00 22.68PALEY DANIEL Water G&A 22.68 4,397.43-PARK CONSTRUCTION CO Street Capital BS RETAINAGE PAYABLE City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 25 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 6/29/20265/27/2026 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 87,948.53Street Capital G&A 5,411.49-MSA Capital BS RETAINAGE PAYABLE 108,229.77MSA Capital G&A 9.78-Franchise Fees BS RETAINAGE PAYABLE 195.60Franchise Fees G&A 4,479.37-Water BS RETAINAGE PAYABLE 89,587.402025A GO Utility Revenue G&A 3,078.18-Sewer BS RETAINAGE PAYABLE 61,563.62Sewer G&A 79.31-Storm Water Utility BS RETAINAGE PAYABLE 1,586.20Storm Water Utility G&A 331,655.56 348.00PARRIS MITCHELL Westwood G&A Refunds/Reimbursements 348.00 930.00PATRIOT DIAMOND Public Works G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 930.00 1,547.84PER MAR SECURITY SERVICES Rec Center Gen Division G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 1,547.84 632.00PERFORMANCE PLUS LLC Human Resources G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 27,105.00Fire Department G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 27,737.00 90.00PERSON BARB Organized Rec G&A 90.00 10,050.00PETERSON COMPANIES Storm Water Utility BS GENERAL 10,050.00 5,909.41PHILIP'S TREE CARE LLC Park Maintenance G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 5,909.41 2,475.00PHOMPHAKDY ALAN Employee Benefits G&A 2,475.00 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 26 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 6/29/20265/27/2026 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 2,000.00PIONEER SECURESHRED Solid Waste G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 2,000.00 3,049.08PLAISTED COMPANIES INC Park Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 3,049.08 3,997.00PLANTRA INC Park Improvement G&A Other Fees 3,997.00 706.04PLAYPOWER LT FARMINGTON INC Vehicle Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 706.04 4,141.73PMA ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC CITY POOLED INVESTMENTS Misc Expenditures 4,141.73 11,040.00POLYBEST, INC.Solid Waste G&A Organics Utility Expense 11,040.00 25,000.00POSTMASTERComm & Marketing G&A Postage & Delivery 25,000.00 1,440.00PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC Natural Resources G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 1,440.00 2,484.00PRECISE MRM, LLC.Park Maintenance G&A Repairs, Maint, Serv on Tech 2,484.00 655.00PRECISION DRIVING CENTER Police G&A Other Travel, Conv & Conf 655.00 321.94PREMIUM WATERS Fire Department G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 321.94 9,615.00PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING LA CRT 2022A Refund 2010C G&A Misc Expenditures 9,615.00 85.00PRONSCHINSKE JILLIAN Building and Energy G&A 85.00 1,125.00PROOPS CHARLES A Climate Investment G&A City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 27 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 6/29/20265/27/2026 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 1,125.00 2,063.58PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSN Employee Benefits G&A Misc Expenditures 2,063.58 801.87PUMP & METER SERVICE Vehicle Maintenance G&A Repairs and Maintenance 358.93Vehicle Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 1,160.80 2,046.04QUALITY FLOW SYSTEMS INC Sewer G&A Repairs and Maintenance 2,046.04 175.42QUILES SYLVIA Water G&A 175.42 593.60RAINBOW TREECARE Natural Resources G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 593.60 1,500.00RAPPAPORT FRED Storm Water Utility BS GENERAL 1,500.00 4,618.49REACH FOR RESOURCES INC Organized Rec G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 4,618.49 27,600.00REDPATH & COMPANY LLC Finance G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 27,600.00 339.60REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Westwood G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 339.60 108.01REIMRINGER ZACHARY Water G&A 108.01 86.34REPUBLIC PARTNERS LLC Water G&A 86.34 12,120.52REPUBLIC SERVICES Facilties Maintenance G&A Solid Waste Utility 81,806.78Solid Waste G&A Organics Utility Expense 10,728.88Rec Center Gen Division G&A Solid Waste Utility 104,656.18 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 28 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 6/29/20265/27/2026 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 2,366.70REVOLUTIONARY SPORTS LLC Organized Rec G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 2,366.70 350.00REYELTS WILLIAM Water G&A 350.00 300.00RHOADS ANDRA Westwood G&A Refunds/Reimbursements 300.00 120.00RIEGERT JONATHAN Police G&A In-State Travel 120.00 95.00RIX JESSE Public Works G&A Other Travel, Conv & Conf 95.00 7,324.98ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY Comm & Marketing G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 7,324.98 120.00ROBINSON LOGAN Fire Department G&A In-State Travel 120.00 121.87ROSEN RUDY Water G&A 121.87 943.10ROSEVILLE MIDWAY FORD General Fund BS Inventory 943.10 88.00ROTO-ROOTER Building and Energy G&A 88.00 134.85RUTT ROBERT Water G&A 134.85 918.00SAFE-FAST INC Water G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 918.00 453.76SAFELITE FULFILLMENT INC Vehicle Maintenance G&A Repairs and Maintenance 453.76 250.00SCAPSAPolice G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 250.00 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 29 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 6/29/20265/27/2026 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 4,450.26SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP Facilties Maintenance G&A Repairs and Maintenance 4,450.26 150.00SCHMIDT DANIELLE Storm Water Utility G&A 150.00 2,250.00SCOTT NELSON COACHING INC Fire Department G&A Other Travel, Conv & Conf 2,250.00 425.00SETS DESIGN INC.Police G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 425.00 823.00SHADYWOOD TREE EXPERTS & LANDSCAPING Natural Resources G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 823.00 970.00SHAPCO PRINTING INC Fire Department G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 625.00Organized Rec G&A Postage & Delivery 552.76Natural Resources G&A Admin/Office Supplies & Mat 998.00Rec Center Gen Division G&A Postage & Delivery 998.00Aquatic Division G&A Postage & Delivery 4,143.76 987.45SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON, INC.Engineering G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 2,459.55Street Capital G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 50,194.12Franchise Fees G&A 61,777.38Water G&A 6,435.15Sewer G&A 10,296.23Storm Water Utility G&A 132,149.88 81.52SHULTZ DANIEL Water G&A 81.52 70.43SIMPSON NELS Water G&A 70.43 3,489.65SITEIMPROVE INC Comm & Marketing G&A Software Licensing Less 12 Mo 3,489.65 1,487.41SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC Park Maintenance G&A Admin/Office Supplies & Mat City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 30 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 6/29/20265/27/2026 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 1,487.41 1,500.00SJN INC General Fund BS UNION PARK APTS 1,500.00 50.00SLAIS DIANE Storm Water Utility G&A 50.00 71.00SLOBODYANYUK SLAVA Water G&A 71.00 3,119.10SLP FF ASSOC IAFF LOCAL #993 Employee Benefits BS UNION DUES 3,119.10 311.50SMITH MAURICE JR Police G&A In-State Travel 311.50 214.14SMITH TODD M Water G&A 214.14 6,540.00SOCCER SHOTS Organized Rec G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 6,540.00 225.82SPS COMPANIES INC Water G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 225.82 72.00STANDARD HEATING & A/C Building and Energy G&A 72.00 98.96STANOCH JOSEPH Water G&A 98.96 318.96STATE CHEMICAL SOLUTIONS Park Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 120.00Rec Center Gen Division G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 438.96 113.96STERICYCLE, INC.Human Resources G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 60.56Finance G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 97.68Community Development G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 158.62Facilties Maintenance G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 189.36Police G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 31 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 6/29/20265/27/2026 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 29.67Building and Energy G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 31.27Public Works G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 681.12 2,080.21STERN MICHAEL Water G&A 2,080.21 5,450.00STRATUS BUILDING SOLUTIONS OF ST. PAUL Facilties Maintenance G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 4,200.00Park Maintenance G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 2,850.00Rec Center Gen Division G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 12,500.00 38,661.69STREICHER'S Police G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 209.99Water G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 38,871.68 138.00SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE General Fund BS Inventory 138.00 24,569.33SUMMIT ENVIROSOLUTIONS INC Water Reilly G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 24,569.33 1,276.25SUNBELT RENTALS INC Rec Center Gen Division G&A Repairs and Maintenance 1,276.25 87.35SUNDBERG AMERICA Facilties Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 87.35 1,611.80SUPER SEER Police G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 1,611.80 54.45SVEUM KRISTOPHER Water G&A 54.45 256.00SWANSON MITCHELL Police G&A In-State Travel 256.00 19,570.83SYSCO-MINNESOTA INC Aquatic Division G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 19,570.83 179.25SYSKO KENNETH Police G&A Out-of-State Travel City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 32 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 6/29/20265/27/2026 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 179.25 1,064.00TACTICAL SOLUTIONS Police G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 1,064.00 77.50TAMMINEN BLAKE Water G&A 77.50 2,300.00TAZA FANNY ZHICAY General Fund BS UNION PARK APTS 2,300.00 197.76TEGG MASON Water G&A 197.76 275.69TENNANT SALES AND SERVICE CO.Facilties Maintenance G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 275.69 564.15TERMINIX COMMERCIAL Facilties Maintenance G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 146.72Rec Center Gen Division G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 710.87 15,696.25THE DAVEY TREE EXPERT COMPANY Natural Resources G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 15,696.25 56.89THE ESTATE OF MARGUERITE PATRICIA MILLER Water G&A 56.89 1,250.00THE MCNANEY GROUP, INC.Comm & Marketing G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 1,250.00 1,001.81THE MPX GROUP Comm & Marketing G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 1,001.81 5,125.00THE RESET Adminstrative Operations G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 5,125.00 873.02THE RETROFIT COMPANIES INC Facilties Maintenance G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 873.02 2,206.00THE SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO Public Works G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 2,206.00 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 33 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 6/29/20265/27/2026 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 73.00THE SIGN PRODUCERS INC Facilties Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 218.00Police G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 291.00 830.00TNC INDUSTRIES INC Facilties Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 830.00 13.64TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY Water G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 13.64 1,000.00TRAFFIC CONTROL CORP Public Works G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 1,000.00 451.00TRANSWEST TRUCKS SAVAGE Vehicle Maintenance G&A Repairs and Maintenance 451.00 85,564.71TRASH CONTRACTORS LLC Solid Waste G&A Yard Waste Utility 85,564.71 4,669.20TREE TRUST Natural Resources G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 4,669.20 111.91TRI-STATE BOBCAT General Fund BS Inventory 1,215.00Public Works G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 1,326.91 700.00TRUNORTH SOLAR Property Casualty G&A Property Insurance 700.00 112.20TWIN CITIES HOME RENTAL Water G&A 112.20 150.00TWIN CITIES SKATERS Organized Rec G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 150.00 97.94TYLER PROPERTIES LLC Water G&A 97.94 101.75ULINEPolice G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 652.86Water G&A Operations Supplies & Mat City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 34 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 6/29/20265/27/2026 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 2,586.96Rec Center Gen Division G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 3,341.57 2,784.87ULTIMATE EVENTS Fire Department G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 2,784.87 1,264.52ULTIMATE SAFETY CONCEPTS INC Fire Department G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 225.00Fire Department G&A Repairs and Maintenance 1,489.52 250.00UNO DOS TRES COMMUNICATIONS Police G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 250.00 100.00URCH ADAM Water G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 100.00 555.00US COMPOSTING COUNCIL Solid Waste G&A Dues, Memberships, Licenses 555.00 797.56USA BLUE BOOK Sewer G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 797.56 1,539.18VALPAK FRANCHISE OPERATIONS INC Aquatic Division G&A Postage & Delivery 1,539.18 921.49VAN PAPER COMPANY Rec Center Gen Division G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 921.49 1,500.00VANESSA LARSON Climate Investment G&A 1,500.00 116.00VERIFIED CREDENTIALS LLC.Human Resources G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 116.00 21,461.18VERIZONIT G&A Telephone Communications 21,461.18 2,170.00VETERAN ELECTRIC Facilties Maintenance G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 1,050.00Park Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 1,952.00Rec Center Gen Division G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 785.00Aquatic Division G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 35 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 6/29/20265/27/2026 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 5,957.00 2,200.00VINELAND TREE CARE Natural Resources G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 2,200.00 12,669.70VISION BANCSHARES INC Climate Investment G&A 12,669.70 2,389.08VISTAR-PERFORMANCE FOOD SERVICE Aquatic Division G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 2,389.08 153.47VORPAHL KRISTINA Water G&A 153.47 250.00WAGNER JAKE Water G&A 250.00 100.00WAHLSTROM LISA Storm Water Utility G&A 100.00 409.50WARNING LITES OF MN INC Park Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 409.50 2,460.00WESSBERG GRAHAM Employee Benefits G&A 2,460.00 45.00WILLIAMS MARK Building and Energy G&A 45.00 39.56WILLIAMS MICHAEL BACCUS-Water G&A 39.56 175.00WILLIAMS, DALLAS J Police G&A Other Travel, Conv & Conf 175.00 311.00WILSONS NURSERY INC Park Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 311.00 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 36 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 6/29/20265/27/2026 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 727.18WITMER PUBLIC SAFETY GROUP INC Fire Department G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 727.18 2,958.18WM CORPORATE SERVICES INC Solid Waste G&A Yard Waste Utility 580.59Park Maintenance G&A Solid Waste Utility 3,538.77 1,443.26WM MUELLER & SONS INC Public Works G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 1,443.26 36,452.41WOLD ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS Municipal Building & Infra G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 36,452.41 2,493.08WORLD FUEL SERVICES, INC.General Fund BS Inventory 2,493.08 8,169.44WSB ASSOC INC MSA Capital G&A 9,038.59Franchise Fees G&A 9,887.29Water G&A 1,949.45Sewer G&A 5,110.98Storm Water Utility G&A 2,500.00Technology G&A Capitalized Tech Software 36,655.75 1,650.00WW GOETSCH ASSOCIATES INC Aquatic Division G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 1,650.00 121.87WYATT, LISA REI G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 121.87 21,213.58XCEL ENERGY 14,230.40 103,984.71 Electric Utility Electric Utility Electric Utility Electric Utility Electric Utility Electric Utility Electric Utility Electric Utility Facilties Maintenance G&A Public Works G&A Water G&A Water Reilly G&A Sewer G&A Storm Water Utility G&A Park Maintenance G&A Rec Center Gen Division G&A 41,741.04 1,432.894, 463.972,6 65.981,02 0.7017,21 6.15 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 37 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 6/29/20265/27/2026 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 59.80XTREME ELECTRICAL SERVICES Building and Energy G&A 59.80 2,382.50YOUNG ENV. CONSULTING GROUP, LLC. Storm Water Utility G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 2,382.50 88.04YULIYA NAVASIALETSKAYA Water G&A 88.04 2,614.44ZIEGLER INC General Fund BS Inventory 2,614.44 Report Totals 3,330,499.41 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 38 Meeting: City council Meeting date: July 6, 2026 Consent agenda item: 5b Executive summary Title: Resolution accepting donations to the city for the parks and recreation department Recommended action: Motion to adopt a resolution accepting bench donations from Lighthouse Management Group, Inc. honoring Monique Yenamandra and from Joe and Jill Bollettieri honoring their wedding anniversary. Policy consideration: Does the city council want to accept the donations with restrictions on their use? Summary: State statute requires city council’s acceptance of donations. This requirement is necessary in order to make sure the city council has knowledge of any restrictions placed on the use of each donation prior to it being expended. o Donation for a memorial bench in Westwood Hills Nature Center honoring Monique Yenamandra from Lighthouse Management Group, Inc., $2,800. o Donation for a memorial bench in Westwood Hills Nature Center honoring 30 years of marriage from Joe and Jill Bollettieri, $2,800. Financial or budget considerations: The monetary donations will be used for memorial benches to be installed at Westwood Hills Nature Center. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to being an inclusive, equitable and vibrant city where everyone feels safe and experiences a strong sense of belonging. Supporting documents: Resolution Prepared by: Stacy M. Voelker, administrative coordinator Reviewed by: Larry Umphrey, parks superintendent Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5b) Page 2 Title: Resolution accepting donations to the city for the parks and recreation department Resolution No. 26-___ Approving acceptance of donations to the city in the amount of $5,600 for two memorial benches to be installed in Westwood Hills Nature Center Be it resolved by the city council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota as follows: Whereas, the City of St. Louis Park is required by state statute to authorize acceptance of any donations; and Whereas, the city council must also ratify any restrictions placed on the donation by the donor; and Whereas, the donation from Lighthouse Management Group, Inc. is given to the city in the amount of $2,800 for a memorial bench honoring Monique Yenamandra to be installed at Westwood Hills Nature Center and the donation from Joe and Jill Bollettieri is given to the city in the amount of $2,800 for a bench honoring their wedding anniversary to be installed at Westwood Hills Nature Center. Now therefore be it resolved, by the city council of the City of St. Louis Park that the gifts are hereby accepted with thanks and appreciation. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council July 6, 2026: Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Meeting: City council Meeting date: July 6, 2026 Consent agenda item: 5c Executive summary Title: Resolution accepting donations to the city for the fire department Recommended action: Motion to adopt resolution accepting donations to the St. Louis Park fire department from Premium Waters, JonnyPops and Lindstrom Restoration for the annual fire department open house. Policy consideration: Does the city council want to accept these donations without restrictions on the use? Summary: State statute requires city council’s acceptance of donations. This requirement is necessary in order to make sure the city council has knowledge of any restrictions placed on the use of each donation prior to it being expended. Premium Waters donated water jugs and water dispensers at an estimated value of $130.00, JonnyPops donated popsicles at an estimated value of $750.00. Lindstrom Restoration donated discarded furniture for the burn room demonstrations. The donations are used for the annual fire department open house. Financial or budget considerations: These donations are used for the annual fire department open house. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to being a city that delivers reliable services, uses city resources responsibly, operates transparently and builds strong relationships with residents. Supporting documents: Resolution Prepared by: Sue Rasmussen, office assistant Reviewed by: Peter Hanlin, fire chief Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5c) Page 2 Title: Resolution accepting donations to the city for the fire department Resolution No. 26-__ Approving acceptance of donations to the city for the fire department Be it resolved by the city council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, as follows: Whereas, the City of St. Louis Park is required by state statute to authorize acceptance of any donation; and Whereas, the city council must ratify any restrictions placed on donations by the donors; and Whereas, the donations from Premium Waters, JonnyPops and Lindstrom Restoration are directed toward the annual fire department open house, Now therefore be it resolved by the city council of St. Louis Park that these donations are hereby accepted with thanks and appreciation. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council July 6, 2026: Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Meeting: City council Meeting date: July 6, 2026 Consent agenda item: 5d Executive summary Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Recommended action: Motion to adopt a resolution awarding the sale of 2026 General Obligation Bonds of $9,930,000, of which $7,365,000 is funded through future levied property tax dollars and $2,565,000 is funded with future water utility revenue. Policy consideration: Does the city council award the sale of General Obligation Bonds in the amount of $9,930,000 for construction, water utility costs and police department facility updates associated with capital improvement projects? Summary: On June 1, 2026, the city council approved a resolution to proceed with issuance and sale process of General Obligation (GO) Bonds, Series 2026A, in the approximate aggregate principal amount of $9,930,000. The sale of GO bond series 2026A will occur on July 6, 2026. With the sale occurring on July 6, 2026, a council resolution is needed to award the results of the sale. Information related to interest rate from the sale and total cost of the sale will be available on July 6, 2026. The bond issuance includes funding for Pavement Management projects for 2026 and 2027, Cedar Lake Road and Louisiana Avenue Phase II street construction work, Connect the Park construction work, and police department facility improvements. Financial or budget considerations: The bonds will be paid back using both levied property tax dollars and utility fee revenue, the actual dollar impact will be finalized on sale date July 6, 2026. The resolution is to award the sale results. Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: Resolution; Preliminary Official Statement dated June 29, 2026; 2025 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report Prepared by: Joe Olson, deputy finance director Reviewed by: Cheyenne Brodeen, administrative services director Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager Resolution No. 26-_______ Awarding the sale of General Obligation Bonds, Series 2026A, in the original aggregate principal amount of $9,930,000; fixing their form and specifications; directing their execution and delivery; and providing for their payment Be it resolved by the city council (the “city council”) of the City of St. Louis Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the “city”) as follows: Section 1. Sale of bonds. 1.01. Authorization. Pursuant to a resolution adopted by the city council on June 1, 2026 (the “authorizing resolution”), the city authorized the sale of its General Obligation Bonds, Series 2026A (the “bonds”), pursuant to section 6.15 of the charter of the city (the “charter”) and Minnesota Statutes, chapters 444 and 475, as amended (the “act”). The authorizing resolution was approved by a vote of at least six (6) members of the city council. (a)The city has determined to undertake various capital projects, including the improvement and reconstruction of Cedar Lake Road and Louisiana Avenue (Phase 2), improvements to sidewalks, bike trails and trails relating to the city’s Connect the Park project (4025), road improvement and reconstruction in connection with the city’s pavement management programs (4026 and 4027), and improvements, renovations and upgrades to the city’s police department facility (collectively, the “capital projects”) pursuant to the charter. (b)The city engineer has recommended the construction of various improvements to the City’s water system, including not limited to watermain and utility improvements associated with the Cedar Lake Road and Louisiana Avenue (Phase 2) project and the city’s pavement management programs (4026 and 4027) (the “utility improvements”), pursuant to the act. 1.02. Award to the purchaser and interest rates. A tabulation of proposals received is attached hereto as Exhibit A. The proposal of Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, as syndicate manager (the “purchaser”), to purchase the bonds is hereby found and determined to be a reasonable offer and is hereby accepted, the proposal being to purchase the bonds at a price of $10,788,578.15 (par amount of $9,930,000.00, plus original issue premium of $942,549.15, less underwriter’s discount of $83,971.00), plus accrued interest, if any, to the date of delivery for bonds bearing interest as follows: City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 2 Year of maturity Interest rate Year of maturity Interest rate 2028 5.000% 2036 5.000% 2029 5.000 2037 5.000 2030 5.000 2038 4.000 2031 5.000 2039 4.000 2032 5.000 2040 4.000 2033 5.000 2041 4.000 2034 5.000 2042 4.000 2035 5.000 True interest cost: 3.3611688% 1.03. Purchase contract. The amount proposed by the purchaser in excess of the minimum bid shall be credited to the accounts of the debt service fund hereinafter created or deposited in the accounts of the construction fund hereinafter created, as determined by the finance director of the city (or any person performing the duties of the finance director, including but not limited to the deputy finance director or the interim finance director (collectively, the “finance director”)) in consultation with the city’s municipal advisor. The good faith deposit of the purchaser shall be retained and deposited until the bonds have been delivered and shall be deducted from the purchase price paid at settlement. The mayor and city manager are directed to execute a contract with the purchaser on behalf of the city if requested by the purchaser. 1.04. Terms and principal amounts of the bonds. The city will forthwith issue and sell the bonds pursuant to the act, in the total principal amount of $9,930,000, originally dated the date of delivery (which is expected to be July 28, 2026), in fully registered form, in the denomination of $5,000 each or any integral multiple thereof, numbered no. R-1, upward, bearing interest as above set forth, and maturing serially on February 1 in the years and amounts as follows: Year of maturity Amount Year of maturity Amount 2028 $350,000 2036 $850,000 2029 600,000 2037 895,000 2030 635,000 2038 540,000 2031 660,000 2039 560,000 2032 700,000 2040 585,000 2033 735,000 2041 605,000 2034 775,000 2042 630,000 2035 810,000 (a) $7,365,000 in principal amount of the bonds (the “charter bonds”), maturing on February 1 in the years and in the amounts set forth below, will be used to finance the construction of the capital projects: City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 3 Year of maturity Amount Year of maturity Amount 2028 $205,000 2036 $540,000 2029 380,000 2037 570,000 2030 405,000 2038 540,000 2031 420,000 2039 560,000 2032 445,000 2040 585,000 2033 470,000 2041 605,000 2034 495,000 2042 630,000 2035 515,000 (b) The remainder of the bonds in the principal amount of $2,565,000 (the “utility revenue bonds”), maturing on February 1 in the years and in the amounts set forth below, will be used to finance the construction of the utility improvements: Year of maturity Amount Year of maturity Amount 2028 $145,000 2033 $265,000 2029 220,000 2034 280,000 2030 230,000 2035 295,000 2031 240,000 2036 310,000 2032 255,000 2037 325,000 1.05. Optional redemption. The city may elect on February 1, 2035, and on any day thereafter to prepay bonds due on or after February 1, 2036. Redemption may be in whole or in part and if in part, at the option of the city and in such manner as the city will determine. If less than all bonds of a maturity are called for redemption, the city will notify DTC (as defined in section 7 hereof) of the particular amount of such maturity to be prepaid. DTC will determine by lot the amount of each participant’s interest in such maturity to be redeemed and each participant will then select by lot the beneficial ownership interests in such maturity to be redeemed. Prepayments will be at a price of par plus accrued interest. Section 2. Registration and payment. 2.01. Registered form. The bonds will be issued only in fully registered form. The interest thereon and, upon surrender of each bond, the principal amount thereof, is payable by check or draft issued by the registrar described herein. 2.02. Dates; interest payment dates. Each bond will be dated as of the last interest payment date preceding the date of authentication to which interest on the bond has been paid or made available for payment, unless (i) the date of authentication is an interest payment date to which interest has been paid or made available for payment, in which case the bond will be dated as of the date of authentication, or (ii) the date of authentication is prior to the first interest payment date, in which case the bond will be dated as of the date of original issue. The interest on the bonds is payable on February 1 and August 1 of each year, commencing August 1, 2027, to the registered owners of record thereof as of the close of business on the fifteenth day of the immediately preceding month, whether or not such day is a business day. City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 4 2.03. Registration. The city will appoint a bond registrar, transfer agent, authenticating agent and paying agent (the “registrar” and “paying agent”). The effect of registration and the rights and duties of the city and the registrar with respect thereto are as follows: (a) Register. The registrar must keep at its principal corporate trust office a bond register in which the registrar provides for the registration of ownership of bonds and the registration of transfers and exchanges of bonds entitled to be registered, transferred or exchanged. (b) Transfer of bonds. Upon surrender for transfer of a bond duly endorsed by the registered owner thereof or accompanied by a written instrument of transfer, in form satisfactory to the registrar, duly executed by the registered owner thereof or by an attorney duly authorized by the registered owner in writing, the registrar will authenticate and deliver, in the name of the designated transferee or transferees, one or more new bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as requested by the transferor. The registrar may, however, close the books for registration of any transfer after the fifteenth day of the month preceding each interest payment date and until that interest payment date. (c) Exchange of bonds. When bonds are surrendered by the registered owner for exchange the registrar will authenticate and deliver one or more new bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity as requested by the registered owner or the owner’s attorney in writing. (d) Cancellation. Bonds surrendered upon transfer or exchange will be promptly cancelled by the registrar and thereafter disposed of as directed by the city. (e) Improper or unauthorized transfer. When a bond is presented to the registrar for transfer, the registrar may refuse to transfer the bond until the registrar is satisfied that the endorsement on the bond or separate instrument of transfer is valid and genuine and that the requested transfer is legally authorized. The registrar will incur no liability for the refusal, in good faith, to make transfers which it, in its judgment, deems improper or unauthorized. (f) Persons deemed owners. The city and the registrar may treat the person in whose name a bond is registered in the bond register as the absolute owner of the bond, whether the bond is overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment of, or on account of, the principal of and interest on the bond and for all other purposes, and payments so made to a registered owner or upon the owner’s order will be valid and effectual to satisfy and discharge the liability upon the bond to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. (g) Taxes, fees and charges. The registrar may impose a charge upon the owner thereof for a transfer or exchange of bonds sufficient to reimburse the registrar for any tax, fee or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to the transfer or exchange. City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 5 (h) Mutilated, lost, stolen or destroyed bonds. If a bond becomes mutilated or is destroyed, stolen or lost, the registrar will deliver a new bond of like amount, number, maturity date and tenor in exchange and substitution for and upon cancellation of the mutilated bond or in lieu of and in substitution for any bond destroyed, stolen or lost, upon the payment of the reasonable expenses and charges of the registrar in connection therewith; and, in the case of a bond destroyed, stolen or lost, upon filing with the registrar of evidence satisfactory to it that the bond was destroyed, stolen or lost, and of the ownership thereof, and upon furnishing to the registrar an appropriate bond or indemnity in form, substance and amount satisfactory to it and as provided by law, in which both the city and the registrar must be named as obligees. Bonds so surrendered to the registrar will be cancelled by the registrar and evidence of such cancellation must be given to the city. If the mutilated, destroyed, stolen or lost bond has already matured or been called for redemption in accordance with its terms it is not necessary to issue a new bond prior to payment. (i) Redemption. In the event any of the bonds are called for redemption, notice thereof identifying the bonds to be redeemed will be given by the registrar by mailing a copy of the redemption notice by first-class mail (postage prepaid) at least 30 and not more than 60 days prior to the redemption date to the registered owner of each bond to be redeemed at the address shown on the registration books kept by the registrar and by publishing the notice if required by law. Failure to give notice by publication or by mail to any registered owner, or any defect therein, will not affect the validity of the proceedings for the redemption of bonds. Bonds so called for redemption will cease to bear interest after the specified redemption date, provided that the funds for the redemption are on deposit with the place of payment at that time. 2.04. Appointment of initial registrar. The city appoints Bond Trust Services Corporation, Minneapolis, Minnesota, as the initial registrar. The mayor and the city manager are authorized to execute and deliver, on behalf of the city, a contract with the registrar. Upon merger or consolidation of the registrar with another corporation, if the resulting corporation is a bank or trust company authorized by law to conduct such business, the resulting corporation is authorized to act as successor registrar. The city agrees to pay the reasonable and customary charges of the registrar for the services performed. The city reserves the right to remove the registrar upon thirty (30) days’ notice and upon the appointment of a successor registrar, in which event the predecessor registrar must deliver all cash and bonds in its possession to the successor registrar and must deliver the bond register to the successor registrar. On or before each principal or interest due date, without further order of the city council, the finance director must transmit to the registrar moneys sufficient for the payment of all principal and interest then due. 2.05. Execution, authentication and delivery. The bonds will be prepared under the direction of the city manager and executed on behalf of the city by the signatures of the mayor and the city manager, provided that those signatures may be printed, engraved or lithographed facsimiles of the originals. If an officer whose signature or a facsimile of whose signature appears on the bonds ceases to be such officer before the delivery of a bond, that signature or facsimile will nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes, the same as if the officer had remained in office until delivery. Notwithstanding such execution, a bond will not be valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to any security or benefit under this resolution unless and until a certificate of authentication on the bond has been duly executed by the manual City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 6 signature of an authorized representative of the registrar. Certificates of authentication on different bonds need not be signed by the same representative. The executed certificate of authentication on a bond is conclusive evidence that it has been authenticated and delivered under this resolution. When the bonds have been so prepared, executed and authenticated, the city manager will deliver the same to the purchaser upon payment of the purchase price in accordance with the contract of sale heretofore made and executed, and the purchaser is not obligated to see to the application of the purchase price. Section 3. Form of bond. 3.01. Execution of the bonds. The bonds will be printed or typewritten in substantially the form set forth in Exhibit B. 3.02. Approving legal opinion. The city manager is authorized and directed to obtain a copy of the proposed approving legal opinion of Kutak Rock LLP, Minneapolis, Minnesota, and cause the opinion to be printed on or accompany each bond. Section 4. Payment; security; pledges and covenants. 4.01. Debt service fund. The bonds will be payable from the General Obligation Bonds, Series 2026A Debt Service Fund (the “debt service fund”) hereby created. The debt service fund shall be administered and maintained by the finance director as a bookkeeping account separate and apart from all other funds maintained in the official financial records of the city. The city will maintain the following accounts in the debt service fund: the “capital projects account” and the “utility improvements account.” Amounts in the capital projects account are irrevocably pledged to the charter bonds, and amounts in the utility improvements account are irrevocably pledged to the utility revenue bonds. (a) Capital projects account. The finance director shall timely deposit in the capital projects account of the debt service fund the ad valorem taxes hereinafter levied (the “taxes”) for the payment of the charter bonds, which taxes are pledged to the capital projects account of the debt service fund. There is also appropriated to the capital projects account of the debt service fund a pro rata portion of (i) amounts over the minimum purchase price paid by the purchaser, to the extent designated for deposit in the debt service fund in accordance with section 1.03 hereof; (ii) all investment earnings on amounts in the capital projects account of the debt service fund; and (iii) any other funds appropriated for the payment of principal or interest on the charter bonds. (b) Utility improvements account. The city will continue to maintain and operate its Water Fund (the “water fund”), to which will be credited all gross revenues of the water system, and out of which will be paid all normal and reasonable expenses of current operations of such system. Any balances therein are deemed net revenues (the “net revenues”) and will be transferred, from time to time, to the utility improvements account of the debt service fund, which utility improvements account of the debt service fund will be used only to pay principal of and interest on the utility revenue bonds, and any other bonds similarly authorized. There will always be retained in the utility improvements account of the debt service fund a sufficient amount to pay principal of and interest on the utility revenue bonds, and the finance director must report any current or anticipated deficiency in the utility improvements account of the debt service fund to the city council. There is also appropriated to the utility improvements City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 7 account of the debt service fund a pro rata portion of (i) amounts over the minimum purchase price of the bonds paid by the purchaser, to the extent designated for deposit in the debt service fund in accordance with section 1.03 hereof; (ii) all investment earnings on amounts in the debt service fund; and (iii) any other funds appropriated for the payment of principal or interest on the bonds. 4.02. Construction fund. The city hereby creates the General Obligation Bonds, Series 2026A Construction Fund (the “construction fund”). The construction fund shall be administered and maintained by the finance director as a bookkeeping account separate and apart from all other funds maintained in the official financial records of the city. The city will maintain the following accounts in the construction fund: the “capital projects account” and the “utility improvements account.” Amounts in the capital projects account are irrevocably pledged to the charter bonds, and amounts in the utility improvements account are irrevocably pledged to the utility revenue bonds. (a) Capital projects account. Proceeds of the charter bonds, less the appropriations made in section 4.01(a) hereof, together with taxes and any other funds appropriated for the capital projects collected during the construction of the capital projects, will be deposited in the capital projects account of the construction fund to be used solely to defray expenses of the capital projects and the payment of principal and interest on the charter bonds prior to the completion and payment of all costs of the capital projects. When the capital projects are completed and the cost thereof paid, the capital projects account of the construction fund is to be closed and any funds remaining may be deposited in the capital projects account of the debt service fund or may be used as provided in section 475.65 of the act, under the direction of the city council. (b) Utility improvements account. Proceeds of the utility revenue bonds, less the appropriations made in section 4.01(b) hereof, together with any other funds appropriated for the utility improvements collected during the construction of the utility improvements, will be deposited in the utility improvements account of the construction fund to be used solely to defray expenses of the utility improvements and the payment of principal and interest on the utility revenue bonds prior to the completion and payment of all costs of the utility improvements. When the utility improvements are completed and the cost thereof paid, the utility improvements account of the construction fund is to be closed and any funds remaining may be deposited in the utility improvements account of the debt service fund or may be used as provided in section 475.65 of the act, under the direction of the city council. 4.03. City covenants with respect to the utility revenue bonds. The city covenants and agrees with the holders of the bonds that so long as any of the bonds remain outstanding and unpaid, it will keep and enforce the following covenants and agreements: (a) The city will continue to maintain and efficiently operate the water system as a public utility and convenience free from competition of other like municipal utilities and will cause all revenues therefrom to be deposited in bank accounts and credited to the water fund, as hereinabove provided, and will make no expenditures from the water fund except for a duly authorized purpose and in accordance with this resolution. City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 8 (b) The city will also maintain the utility improvements account of the debt service fund as a separate account and will cause money to be credited thereto from time to time, out of net revenues from the water system in sums sufficient to pay principal of and interest on the utility revenue bonds when due. (c) The city will keep and maintain proper and adequate books of records and accounts separate from all other records of the city in which will be complete and correct entries as to all transactions relating to the water system and which will be open to inspection and copying by any bondholder, or the bondholder’s agent or attorney, at any reasonable time, and it will furnish certified transcripts therefrom upon request and upon payment of a reasonable fee therefor, and said account will be audited at least annually by a qualified public accountant and statements of such audit and report will be furnished to all bondholders upon request. (d) The city council will cause persons handling revenues of the water system to be bonded in reasonable amounts for the protection of the city and the bondholders and will cause the funds collected on account of the operations of such system to be deposited in a bank whose deposits are guaranteed under the federal deposit insurance law. (e) The city council will keep the water system insured at all times against loss by fire, tornado and other risks customarily insured against, with an insurer or insurers in good standing, in such amounts as are customary for like plants, to protect the holders, from time to time, of the bonds and the city from any loss due to any such casualty and will apply the proceeds of such insurance to make good any such loss. (f) The city and each and all of its officers will punctually perform all duties with reference to the water system as required by law. (g) The city will impose and collect charges of the nature authorized by section 444.075 of the act at the times and in the amounts required to produce net revenues adequate to pay all principal and interest when due on the utility revenue bonds and to create and maintain such reserves securing said payments as may be provided herein. (h) The city council will levy general ad valorem taxes on all taxable property in the city when required to meet any deficiency in pledged net revenues. (i) The city hereby determines that the estimated collection of net revenues herein pledged for the payment of principal and interest on the utility revenue bonds will produce at least 5% in excess of the amount needed to meet, when due, the principal and interest payments on the utility revenue bonds. 4.04. General obligation pledge. For the prompt and full payment of the principal of and interest on the bonds, as the same respectively become due, the full faith, credit and taxing powers of the city will be and are hereby irrevocably pledged. If the balance in the debt service fund is ever insufficient to pay all principal and interest then due on the bonds and any other bonds payable therefrom, the deficiency will be promptly paid out of monies in the general fund of the city which are available for such purpose, and such general fund may be reimbursed City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 9 with or without interest from the debt service fund when a sufficient balance is available therein. 4.05. Pledge of tax levy. For the purpose of paying the principal of and interest on the charter bonds, there is levied a direct annual irrepealable ad valorem tax upon all of the taxable property in the city, which will be spread upon the tax rolls and collected with and as part of other general taxes of the city. The taxes will be credited to the capital projects account of the debt service fund above provided and will be in the years and amounts as attached hereto as Exhibit C. 4.06. Debt service coverage. It is hereby determined that (i) the estimated collection of the foregoing taxes will produce at least five percent (5%) in excess of the amount needed to pay when due the principal and interest payments on the charter bonds; and (ii) the net revenues herein pledged will produce at least five percent (5%) in excess of the amount needed to pay when due the principal and interest payments on the utility revenue bonds. The tax levy herein provided is irrepealable until all of the bonds are paid, provided that at the time the city makes its annual tax levies the finance director may certify to the Auditor/Treasurer of Hennepin County, Minnesota (the “county auditor/treasurer”) the amount available in the debt service fund to pay principal and interest due during the ensuing year, and the county auditor/treasurer will thereupon reduce the levy collectible during such year by the amount so certified. 4.07. Registration of resolution. The city manager is authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this resolution with the county auditor/treasurer and to obtain the certificate required by section 475.63 of the act. Section 5. Authentication of transcript. 5.01. City proceedings and records. The officers of the city are authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to the purchaser and to the attorneys approving the bonds certified copies of proceedings and records of the city relating to the bonds and to the financial condition and affairs of the city, and such other certificates, affidavits and transcripts as may be required to show the facts within their knowledge or as shown by the books and records in their custody and under their control, relating to the validity and marketability of the bonds, and such instruments, including any heretofore furnished, will be deemed representations of the city as to the facts stated therein. 5.02. Certification as to official statement. The mayor, the city manager, and/or the finance director are authorized and directed to certify that they have examined the official statement prepared and circulated in connection with the issuance and sale of the bonds and that to the best of their knowledge and belief the official statement is a complete and accurate representation of the facts and representations made therein as of the date of the official statement. 5.03. Other certificates. The mayor, the city manager, and/or the finance director are hereby authorized and directed to furnish to the purchaser at the closing such certificates as are required as a condition of sale. Unless litigation shall have been commenced and be pending questioning the bonds or the organization of the city or incumbency of its officers, at the closing the mayor, the city manager, and the finance director shall also execute and deliver City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 10 to the purchaser a suitable certificate as to absence of material litigation, and the finance director shall also execute and deliver a certificate as to payment for and delivery of the bonds. If an officer whose signature or a facsimile of whose signature appears on any aforementioned certificate or other similar document ceases to be such officer before the delivery of such document, that signature or facsimile will nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes, the same as if the officer had remained in office until delivery. 5.04. Electronic signatures. The electronic signature of the mayor, the city manager, the finance director, and/or the city clerk to this resolution and any certificate authorized to be executed hereunder shall be as valid as an original signature of such party and shall be effective to bind the city thereto. For purposes hereof, (i) “electronic signature” means a manually signed original signature that is then transmitted by electronic means; and (ii) “transmitted by electronic means” means sent in the form of a facsimile or sent via the internet as a portable document format (“pdf”) or other replicating image attached to an electronic mail or internet message. 5.05. Payment of costs of issuance. The city authorizes the purchaser to forward the amount of bond proceeds allocable to the payment of issuance expenses in accordance with the closing memorandum to be prepared and distributed by Ehlers and Associates, Inc., the municipal advisor to the city, on the date of closing. Section 6. Tax covenants. 6.01. Tax-exempt bonds. The city covenants and agrees with the holders from time to time of the bonds that it will not take or permit to be taken by any of its officers, employees or agents any action which would cause the interest on the bonds to become subject to taxation under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “code”), and the treasury regulations promulgated thereunder, in effect at the time of such actions, and that it will take or cause its officers, employees or agents to take, all affirmative action within its power that may be necessary to ensure that such interest will not become subject to taxation under the code and applicable treasury regulations, as presently existing or as hereafter amended and made applicable to the bonds. as presently existing or as hereafter amended and made applicable to the bonds. To that end, the city will comply with all requirements necessary under the code to establish and maintain the exclusion from gross income of the interest on the bonds under section 103 of the code, including without limitation requirements relating to temporary periods for investments, and limitations on amounts invested at a yield greater than the yield on the bonds. 6.02. Rebate. The city will comply with requirements necessary under the code to establish and maintain the exclusion from gross income of the interest on the bonds under section 103 of the code, including without limitation requirements relating to temporary periods for investments, limitations on amounts invested at a yield greater than the yield on the bonds, and the rebate of excess investment earnings to the United States (unless the city qualifies for any exception from the rebate requirements based on timely expenditure of proceeds of the bonds, in accordance with the code and applicable treasury regulations). 6.03. Not private activity bonds. The city further covenants not to use the proceeds of the bonds or the facilities thereby or to cause or permit them or any of them to be used, in such City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 11 a manner as to cause the bonds to be “private activity bonds” within the meaning of sections 103 and 141 through 150 of the code. 6.04. Qualified tax-exempt obligations. In order to qualify the bonds as “qualified tax- exempt obligations” within the meaning of section 265(b)(3) of the code, the city makes the following factual statements and representations: (a) the bonds are not “private activity bonds” as defined in Section 141 of the code; (b) the city designates the bonds as “qualified tax-exempt obligations” for purposes of Section 265(b)(3) of the code; (c) the reasonably anticipated amount of tax-exempt obligations (other than private activity bonds that are not qualified 501(c)(3) bonds) which will be issued by the city (and all subordinate entities of the city) during calendar year 2026 will not exceed $10,000,000; and (d) not more than $10,000,000 of obligations issued by the city during calendar year 2026 have been designated for purposes of Section 265(b)(3) of the code. 6.05. Procedural requirements. The city will use its best efforts to comply with any federal procedural requirements which may apply in order to effectuate the designations made by this section. Section 7. Book-entry system; limited obligation of city. 7.01. DTC. The bonds will be initially issued in the form of a separate single typewritten or printed fully registered bond for each of the maturities set forth in section 1.04 hereof. Upon initial issuance, the ownership of each bond will be registered in the registration books kept by the registrar in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee for The Depository Trust Company, New York, New York, and its successors and assigns (“DTC”). Except as provided in this section, all of the outstanding bonds will be registered in the registration books kept by the registrar in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC. 7.02. Participants. With respect to bonds registered in the registration books kept by the registrar in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC, the city, the registrar and the paying agent will have no responsibility or obligation to any broker dealers, banks and other financial institutions from time to time for which DTC holds bonds as securities depository (the “participants”) or to any other person on behalf of which a participant holds an interest in the bonds, including but not limited to any responsibility or obligation with respect to (i) the accuracy of the records of DTC, Cede & Co. or any participant with respect to any ownership interest in the bonds, (ii) the delivery to any participant or any other person (other than a registered owner of bonds, as shown by the registration books kept by the registrar), of any notice with respect to the bonds, including any notice of redemption, or (iii) the payment to any participant or any other person, other than a registered owner of bonds, of any amount with respect to principal of, premium, if any, or interest on the bonds. The city, the registrar and the paying agent may treat and consider the person in whose name each bond is registered in the registration books kept by the registrar as the holder and absolute owner of such bond for the City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 12 purpose of payment of principal, premium and interest with respect to such bond, for the purpose of registering transfers with respect to such bonds, and for all other purposes. The paying agent will pay all principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the bonds only to or on the order of the respective registered owners, as shown in the registration books kept by the registrar, and all such payments will be valid and effectual to fully satisfy and discharge the city’s obligations with respect to payment of principal of, premium, if any, or interest on the bonds to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. No person other than a registered owner of bonds, as shown in the registration books kept by the registrar, will receive a certificated bond evidencing the obligation of this resolution. Upon delivery by DTC to the city manager of a written notice to the effect that DTC has determined to substitute a new nominee in place of Cede & Co., the words “Cede & Co.” will refer to such new nominee of DTC; and upon receipt of such a notice, the city manager will promptly deliver a copy of the same to the registrar and paying agent. 7.03. Representation letter. The city has heretofore executed and delivered to DTC a blanket issuer letter of representations (the “representation letter”) which will govern payment of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the bonds and notices with respect to the bonds. Any paying agent or registrar subsequently appointed by the city with respect to the bonds will agree to take all action necessary for all representations of the city in the representation letter with respect to the registrar and paying agent, respectively, to be complied with at all times. 7.04. Transfers outside book-entry system. In the event the city, by resolution of the city council, determines that it is in the best interests of the persons having beneficial interests in the bonds that they be able to obtain bond certificates, the city will notify DTC, whereupon DTC will notify the participants, of the availability through DTC of bond certificates. In such event the city will issue, transfer and exchange bond certificates as requested by DTC and any other registered owners in accordance with the provisions of this resolution. DTC may determine to discontinue providing its services with respect to the bonds at any time by giving notice to the city and discharging its responsibilities with respect thereto under applicable law. In such event, if no successor securities depository is appointed, the city will issue and the registrar will authenticate bond certificates in accordance with this resolution and the provisions hereof will apply to the transfer, exchange and method of payment thereof. 7.05. Payments to Cede & Co. Notwithstanding any other provision of this resolution to the contrary, so long as a bond is registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC, payments with respect to principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the bond and all notices with respect to the bond will be made and given, respectively in the manner provided in DTC’s operational arrangements, as set forth in the representation letter. Section 8. Continuing disclosure. 8.01. Execution of continuing disclosure certificate. “Continuing disclosure certificate” means that certain continuing disclosure certificate executed by the mayor and city manager and dated the date of issuance and delivery of the bonds, as originally executed and as it may be amended from time to time in accordance with the terms thereof. 8.02. City compliance with provisions of continuing disclosure certificate. The city hereby covenants and agrees that it will comply with and carry out all of the provisions of the City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 13 continuing disclosure certificate. Notwithstanding any other provision of this resolution, failure of the city to comply with the continuing disclosure certificate is not to be considered an event of default with respect to the bonds; however, any bondholder may take such actions as may be necessary and appropriate, including seeking mandate or specific performance by court order, to cause the city to comply with its obligations under this section. Section 9. Defeasance. When all bonds and all interest thereon have been discharged as provided in this section, all pledges, covenants and other rights granted by this resolution to the holders of the bonds will cease, except that the pledge of the full faith and credit of the city for the prompt and full payment of the principal of and interest on the bonds will remain in full force and effect. The city may discharge all bonds which are due on any date by depositing with the registrar on or before that date a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full. If any bond should not be paid when due, it may nevertheless be discharged by depositing with the registrar a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full with interest accrued to the date of such deposit. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council July 6, 2026 Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 14 Exhibit A Proposals City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 15 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 16 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 17 Exhibit B Form of bond No. R-_____ United States of America $_________ State of Minnesota County of Hennepin City of St. Louis Park General Obligation Bond Series 2026A Rate Maturity Date of original issue CUSIP February 1, 20__ July 28, 2026 Registered owner: Cede & Co. The City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, a duly organized and existing home rule charter city and municipal corporation in Hennepin County, Minnesota (the “city”), acknowledges itself to be indebted and for value received hereby promises to pay to the registered owner specified above or registered assigns, the principal sum of $___________ on the maturity date specified above, with interest thereon from the date hereof at the annual rate specified above (calculated on the basis of a 360 day year of twelve 30 day months), payable February 1 and August 1 in each year, commencing August 1, 2027, to the person in whose name this bond is registered at the close of business on the fifteenth day (whether or not a business day) of the immediately preceding month. The interest hereon and, upon presentation and surrender hereof, the principal hereof are payable in lawful money of the United States of America by check or draft by Bond Trust Services Corporation, Minneapolis, Minnesota, as bond registrar, paying agent, transfer agent and authenticating agent, or its designated successor under the resolution described herein. For the prompt and full payment of such principal and interest as the same respectively become due, the full faith and credit and taxing powers of the city have been and are hereby irrevocably pledged. The city may elect on February 1, 2035, and on any day thereafter to prepay bonds due on or after February 1, 2036. Redemption may be in whole or in part and if in part, at the option of the city and in such manner as the city will determine. If less than all bonds of a maturity are called for redemption, the city will notify The Depository Trust Company (“DTC”) of the particular amount of such maturity to be prepaid. DTC will determine by lot the amount of each participant’s interest in such maturity to be redeemed and each participant will then select by lot the beneficial ownership interests in such maturity to be redeemed. Prepayments will be at a price of par plus accrued interest. This bond is one of an issue in the aggregate principal amount of $9,930,000 all of like original issue date and tenor, except as to number, maturity date, redemption privilege, and interest rate, all issued pursuant to a resolution adopted by the city council on July 6, 2026 (the “resolution”), for the purpose of providing money to aid in financing certain capital projects and City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 18 certain improvements to the municipal water system, pursuant to and in full conformity with the home rule charter of the city and the constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota, including Minnesota Statutes, chapters 444 and 475, as amended, and the principal hereof and interest hereon are payable in part from net revenues of the municipal water system and in part from ad valorem taxes, as set forth in the resolution to which reference is made for a full statement of rights and powers thereby conferred. The full faith and credit of the city are irrevocably pledged for payment of this bond and the city council has obligated itself to levy additional ad valorem taxes on all taxable property in the city in the event of any deficiency in net revenues and ad valorem taxes pledged, which additional taxes may be levied without limitation as to rate or amount. The bonds of this series are issued only as fully registered bonds in denominations of $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof of single maturities. The city council has designated this issue of bonds as “qualified tax-exempt obligations” within the meaning of section 265(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “code”), relating to disallowance of interest expense for financial institutions and within the $10 million limit allowed by the code for the calendar year of issue. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED AND RECITED that in and by the resolution, the city has covenanted and agreed that the city will continue to own and operate the water system free from competition by other like municipal utilities; that adequate insurance on said system and suitable fidelity bonds on employees will be carried; that proper and adequate books of account will be kept showing all receipts and disbursements relating to the water fund, into which the city will pay all of the gross revenues from the water system; that it will also create and maintain the utility improvements account of the General Obligation Bonds, Series 2026A Debt Service Fund, into which the city will pay, out of the net revenues from the water system a sum sufficient to pay principal of the utility revenue bonds (as defined in the resolution) and interest on the utility revenue bonds when due; and that the city will provide, by ad valorem tax levies, for any deficiency in required net revenues of the water system. As provided in the resolution and subject to certain limitations set forth therein, this bond is transferable upon the books of the city at the principal office of the bond registrar, by the registered owner hereof in person or by the owner’s attorney duly authorized in writing upon surrender hereof together with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the bond registrar, duly executed by the registered owner or the owner’s attorney; and may also be surrendered in exchange for bonds of other authorized denominations. Upon such transfer or exchange the city will cause a new bond or bonds to be issued in the name of the transferee or registered owner, of the same aggregate principal amount, bearing interest at the same rate and maturing on the same date, subject to reimbursement for any tax, fee or governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. The city and the bond registrar may deem and treat the person in whose name this bond is registered as the absolute owner hereof, whether this bond is overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment and for all other purposes, and neither the city nor the bond registrar will be affected by any notice to the contrary. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED, RECITED, COVENANTED AND AGREED that all acts, conditions and things required by the home rule charter of the city and the constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed preliminary to and in the issuance of this bond in order to make it a valid and binding general obligation of the city in City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 19 accordance with its terms, have been done, do exist, have happened and have been performed as so required, and that the issuance of this bond does not cause the indebtedness of the city to exceed any constitutional, charter, or statutory limitation of indebtedness. This bond is not valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to any security or benefit under the resolution until the certificate of authentication hereon has been executed by the bond registrar by manual signature of one of its authorized representatives. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of St. Louis Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota, by its city council, has caused this bond to be executed on its behalf by the facsimile or manual signatures of the mayor and city manager and has caused this bond to be dated as of the date set forth below. Dated: July 28, 2026 City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota (Facsimile) (Facsimile) Mayor City Manager ________________________________________ Certificate of authentication This is one of the bonds delivered pursuant to the resolution mentioned within. Bond Trust Services Corporation By Authorized Representative ________________________________________ Abbreviations The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this bond, will be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 20 TEN COM – as tenants in common UNIF GIFT MIN ACT _________ Custodian _________ (Cust) (Minor) TEN ENT – as tenants by entireties under Uniform Gifts or Transfers to Minors Act, State of _______________ JT TEN – as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. ________________________________________ Assignment For value received, the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto ________________________________________ the within bond and all rights thereunder, and does hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint _________________________ attorney to transfer the said bond on the books kept for registration of the within bond, with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated: Notice: The assignor’s signature to this assignment must correspond with the name as it appears upon the face of the within bond in every particular, without alteration or any change whatever. Signature Guaranteed: NOTICE: Signature(s) must be guaranteed by a financial institution that is a member of the Securities Transfer Agent Medallion Program (“STAMP”), the Stock Exchange Medallion Program (“SEMP”), the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. Medallion Signatures Program (“MSP”) or other such “signature guarantee program” as may be determined by the Registrar in addition to, or in substitution for, STAMP, SEMP or MSP, all in accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The registrar will not effect transfer of this bond unless the information concerning the assignee requested below is provided. Name and Address: (Include information for all joint owners if this bond is held by joint account.) City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 21 Please insert social security or other identifying number of assignee ________________________________________ Provisions as to registration The ownership of the principal of and interest on the within bond has been registered on the books of the registrar in the name of the person last noted below. Date of registration Registered owner Signature of officer of registrar Cede & Co. Federal ID #13-2555119 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 22 Exhibit C Tax levy schedule City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 23 Th i s P r e l i m i n a r y O f f i c i a l S t a t e m e n t a n d t h e i n f o r m a t i o n c o n t a i n e d h e r e i n a r e s u b j e c t t o c o m p l e t i o n a n d a m e n d m e n t . T h e s e s e c u r i ti e s m a y n o t b e s o l d n o r m a y o f f e r s t o b u y b e a c c e p t e d p r i o r t o t h e t i m e t h e O f f i c i a l S t a t e m e n t i s d e l i v e r e d i n f i n a l f o r m . U n de r no c i r c u m s t a n c e s s h a l l t h i s P r e l i m i n a r y O f f i c i a l S t a t e m e n t c o n s t i t u t e a n o f f e r t o s e l l o r t h e s o l i c i t a t i o n o f a n o f f e r t o b u y t he s e s e c u r i t i e s n o r s h a l l t h e r e b e a n y s a l e o f t h e s e s e c u r i t i e s i n a n y j u r i s d i c t i o n i n w h i c h s u c h o f f e r , s o l i c i t a t i o n o r s a l e w o u l d b e u n l a w f u l pr i o r t o r e g i s t r a t i o n o r q u a l i f i c a t i o n u n d e r t h e s e c u r i t i e s l a w s o f a n y s u c h j u r i s d i c t i o n . T h i s P r e l i m i n a r y O f f i c i a l S t a t e m e n t i s i n a f o r m d e e m e d f i n a l a s o f i t s d a t e f o r p u r p o s e s o f S E C R u l e 1 5 c 2 - 1 2 ( b ) ( 1 ) , b u t i s s u b j e c t t o r e v i s i o n , a m e n d m e n t a n d c o mp l e t i o n in a F i n a l O f f i c i a l S t a t e m e n t . PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED JUNE 29, 2026 In the opinion of Kutak Rock LLP, Bond Counsel to the Issuer, under existing laws, regulations, rulings and judicial decisions and assuming the accuracy of certain representations and continuing compliance with certain covenants, interest on the Bonds [(including any original issue discount properly allocable to the owner of a Bond)]is excludable from gross income for federal income tax purposes and is not a specific preference item for purposes of the federal alternative minimum tax imposed on individuals. Further, and to the extent of the aforementioned federal income tax exclusion, interest on the Bonds is excludable from taxable net income of individuals, trusts and estates for Minnesota income tax purposes, and is not a preference item for purposes of the computation of the Minnesota alternative minimum tax imposed on individuals, trusts and estates. Interest on the Bonds (a) may affect the federal alternative minimum tax imposed on certain corporations, and (b) is subject to Minnesota franchise taxes on certain corporations (including financial institutions) measured by income. For a more detailed description of such opinions of Bond Counsel, see "Tax Matters" herein and "Appendix B – Form of Legal Opinion." The City will designate the Bonds as "qualified tax-exempt obligations" for purposes of Section 265(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, relating to the ability of financial institutions to deduct from income for federal income tax purposes, interest expense that is allocable to carrying and acquiring tax-exempt obligations. New Issue Rating Application Made: S&P Global Ratings CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA (Hennepin County) $9,930,000* GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2026A PROPOSAL OPENING: July 6, 2026, 10:30 A.M., C.T.CONSIDERATION: July 6, 2026, 6:15 P.M., C.T. PURPOSE/AUTHORITY/SECURITY: The $9,930,000* General Obligation Bonds, Series 2026A (the "Bonds") are being issued pursuant to Section 6.15 of the City Charter of the City of St. Louis Park (the "City"), and Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 444 and 475, as amended, by the City, for the purposes of financing capital projects in the City and water utility improvements, including Phase II of the Cedar Lake and Louisiana road and utility reconstruction, the 2026 pavement management projects and Connect the Park projects and improvements to the Police Department Facility. The Bonds will be general obligations of the City for which its full faith and credit and taxing powers are pledged. Delivery is subject to receipt of an approving legal opinion of Kutak Rock LLP, Minneapolis, Minnesota. DATE OF BONDS: July 28, 2026 MATURITY: February 1 as follows: Year Amount* Year Amount* Year Amount* 2028 $460,000 2033 $745,000 2038 $510,000 2029 650,000 2034 765,000 2039 535,000 2030 675,000 2035 795,000 2040 550,000 2031 695,000 2036 820,000 2041 575,000 2032 715,000 2037 845,000 2042 595,000 *MATURITY ADJUSTMENTS: The City reserves the right to increase or decrease the principal amount of the Bonds on the day of sale, in increments of $5,000 each. Increases or decreases may be made in any maturity. If any principal amounts are adjusted, the purchase price proposed will be adjusted to maintain the same gross spread per $1,000. TERM BONDS: See "Term Bond Option" herein. INTEREST: August 1, 2027 and semiannually thereafter. OPTIONAL REDEMPTION: Bonds maturing on February 1, 2036 and thereafter are subject to call for prior optional redemption on February 1, 2035 or any date thereafter, at a price of par plus accrued interest to the date of optional redemption. MINIMUM PROPOSAL: $9,810,840. GOOD FAITH DEPOSIT: A good faith deposit in the amount of $198,600 shall be made by the winning bidder by wire transfer of funds. PAYING AGENT: Bond Trust Services Corporation. BOND COUNSEL: Kutak Rock LLP. MUNICIPAL ADVISOR: Ehlers and Associates, Inc. BOOK-ENTRY-ONLY:See "Book-Entry-Only System" herein (unless otherwise specified by the purchaser). Page 24 REPRESENTATIONS No dealer, broker, salesperson or other person has been authorized by the City to give any information or to make any representation other than those contained in this Preliminary Official Statement and, if given or made, such other information or representations must not be relied upon as having been authorized by the City. This Preliminary Official Statement does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any of the Bonds in any jurisdiction to any person to whom it is unlawful to make such an offer or solicitation in such jurisdiction. This Preliminary Official Statement is not to be construed as a contract with the Underwriter (Syndicate Manager). Statements contained herein which involve estimates or matters of opinion are intended solely as such and are not to be construed as representations of fact. Ehlers and Associates, Inc. prepared this Preliminary Official Statement and any addenda thereto relying on information of the City and other sources for which there is reasonable basis for believing the information is accurate and complete. Bond Counsel has not participated in the preparation of this Preliminary Official Statement and is not expressing any opinion as to the completeness or accuracy of the information contained therein. Compensation of Ehlers and Associates, Inc., payable entirely by the City, is contingent upon the delivery of the Bonds. COMPLIANCE WITH S.E.C. RULE 15c2-12 Certain municipal obligations (issued in an aggregate amount over $1,000,000) are subject to Rule 15c2-12 promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Rule"). Preliminary Official Statement: This Preliminary Official Statement was prepared for the City for dissemination to potential investors. Its primary purpose is to disclose information regarding the Bonds to prospective underwriters in the interest of receiving competitive proposals in accordance with the sale notice contained herein. Unless an addendum is posted prior to the sale, this Preliminary Official Statement shall be deemed nearly final for purposes of the Rule subject to completion, revision and amendment in a Final Official Statement as defined below. Review Period: This Preliminary Official Statement has been distributed to prospective bidders for review. Comments or requests for the correction of omissions or inaccuracies must be submitted to Ehlers and Associates, Inc. at least two business days prior to the sale. Requests for additional information or corrections in the Preliminary Official Statement received on or before this date will not be considered a qualification of a proposal received from an underwriter. If there are any changes, corrections or additions to the Preliminary Official Statement, interested bidders will be informed by an addendum prior to the sale. Final Official Statement: Copies of the Final Official Statement will be delivered to the Underwriter (Syndicate Manager) within seven business days following the proposal acceptance. Continuing Disclosure: Subject to certain exemptions, issues in an aggregate amount over $1,000,000 may be required to comply with provisions of the Rule which require that underwriters obtain from the issuers of municipal securities (or other obligated party) an agreement for the benefit of the owners of the securities to provide continuing disclosure with respect to those securities. This Preliminary Official Statement describes the conditions under which the City is required to comply with the Rule. CLOSING CERTIFICATES Upon delivery of the Bonds, the Underwriter (Syndicate Manager) will be furnished with the following items: (1) a certificate of the appropriate officials to the effect that at the time of the sale of the Bonds and all times subsequent thereto up to and including the time of the delivery of the Bonds, this Preliminary Official Statement did not and does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; (2) a receipt signed by the appropriate officer evidencing payment for the Bonds; (3) a certificate evidencing the due execution of the Bonds, including statements that (a) no litigation of any nature is pending, or to the knowledge of signers, threatened, restraining or enjoining the issuance and delivery of the Bonds, (b) neither the corporate existence or boundaries of the City nor the title of the signers to their respective offices is being contested, and (c) no authority or proceedings for the issuance of the Bonds have been repealed, revoked or rescinded; and (4) a certificate setting forth facts and expectations of the City which indicates that the City does not expect to use the proceeds of the Bonds in a manner that would cause them to be arbitrage bonds within the meaning of Section 148 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or within the meaning of applicable Treasury Regulations. ii City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 25 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTORY STATEMENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 THE BONDS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 GENERAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 OPTIONAL REDEMPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 AUTHORITY; PURPOSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 ESTIMATED SOURCES AND USES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 SECURITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 RATING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 CONTINUING DISCLOSURE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 LEGAL OPINION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 TAX MATTERS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 QUALIFIED TAX-EXEMPT OBLIGATIONS . . . . . . . . . . 7 MUNICIPAL ADVISOR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 MUNICIPAL ADVISOR AFFILIATED COMPANIES. . . . 8 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 RISK FACTORS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 VALUATIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 OVERVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 CURRENT PROPERTY VALUATIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 2025/26 NET TAX CAPACITY BY CLASSIFICATION . 13 TREND OF VALUATIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 LARGEST TAXPAYING PARCELS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 DEBT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 DIRECT DEBT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 DEBT PAYMENT HISTORY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 FUTURE FINANCING. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 DEBT LIMIT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 SCHEDULES OF BONDED INDEBTEDNESS . . . . . . . . 17 OVERLAPPING DEBT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 DEBT RATIOS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 TAX LEVIES, COLLECTIONS AND RATES . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 TAX LEVIES AND COLLECTIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 TAX CAPACITY RATES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 THE ISSUER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 CITY GOVERNMENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 EMPLOYEES; PENSIONS; UNIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 POST EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 LITIGATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 MUNICIPAL BANKRUPTCY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 FUNDS ON HAND. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 ENTERPRISE FUNDS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 SUMMARY GENERAL FUND INFORMATION. . . . . . . . . 31 GENERAL FUND BUDGET SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 GENERAL INFORMATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 LOCATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 LARGER EMPLOYERS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 BUILDING PERMITS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 U.S. CENSUS DATA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 EMPLOYMENT/UNEMPLOYMENT DATA. . . . . . . . . . . . 35 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-1 FORM OF LEGAL OPINION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-1 BOOK-ENTRY-ONLY SYSTEM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C-1 FORM OF CONTINUING DISCLOSURE CERTIFICATE . . . . D-1 TERMS OF PROPOSAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E-1 PROPOSAL FORM iii City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 26 CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK CITY COUNCIL Term Expires Nadia Mohamed Mayor January 2028 Daniel Bashore Council Member January 2030 Paul Baudhuin Council Member January 2028 Tim Brausen Council Member January 2030 Sue Budd Council Member January 2030 Jim Engelking Council Member January 2030 Yolanda Farris Council Member January 2028 ADMINISTRATION Kim Keller, City Manager Joe Olson, Deputy Finance Director Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Campbell Knutson, P.A., City Attorney, Eagan, Minnesota Kutak Rock LLP, Bond Counsel, Minneapolis, Minnesota Ehlers and Associates, Inc., Municipal Advisors, Minneapolis, Minnesota (Other office located in Waukesha, Wisconsin) iv City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 27 INTRODUCTORY STATEMENT This Preliminary Official Statement contains certain information regarding the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota (the "City") and the issuance of its $9,930,000* General Obligation Bonds, Series 2026A (the "Bonds"). Any descriptions or summaries of the Bonds, statutes, or documents included herein are not intended to be complete and are qualified in their entirety by reference to such statutes and documents and the form of the Bonds to be included in the resolution authorizing the issuance and sale of the Bonds ("Award Resolution") to be adopted by the City Council on July 6, 2026. Inquiries may be directed to Ehlers and Associates, Inc. ("Ehlers" or the "Municipal Advisor"), Minneapolis, Minnesota, (651) 697-8500, the City's municipal advisor. A copy of this Preliminary Official Statement may be downloaded from Ehlers' web site at www.ehlers-inc.com by connecting to the Bond Sales link and following the directions at the top of the site. THE BONDS GENERAL The Bonds will be issued in fully registered form as to both principal and interest in denominations of $5,000 each or any integral multiple thereof, and will be dated, as originally issued, as of July 28, 2026. The Bonds will mature on February 1 in the years and amounts set forth on the cover of this Preliminary Official Statement. Interest will be payable on February 1 and August 1 of each year, commencing August 1, 2027, to the registered owners of the Bonds appearing of record in the bond register as of the close of business on the 15th day (whether or not a business day) of the immediately preceding month. Interest will be computed upon the basis of a 360-day year of twelve 30-day months and will be rounded pursuant to rules of the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board ("MSRB"). The rate for any maturity may not be more than 2.00% less than the rate for any preceding maturity. (For example, if a rate of 4.50% is proposed for the 2028 maturity, then the lowest rate that may be proposed for any later maturity is 2.50%.) All Bonds of the same maturity must bear interest from the date of issue until paid at a single, uniform rate. Each rate must be expressed in an integral multiple of 5/100 or 1/8 of 1%. Unless otherwise specified by the purchaser, the Bonds will be registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee for The Depository Trust Company, New York, New York ("DTC"). (See "Book-Entry-Only System" herein.) As long as the Bonds are held under the book-entry system, beneficial ownership interests in the Bonds may be acquired in book-entry form only, and all payments of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds shall be made through the facilities of DTC and its participants. If the book-entry system is terminated, principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds shall be payable as provided in the Award Resolution. The City has selected Bond Trust Services Corporation, Minneapolis, Minnesota ("BTSC"), to act as paying agent (the "Paying Agent"). BTSC and Ehlers are affiliate companies. The City will pay the charges for Paying Agent services. The City reserves the right to remove the Paying Agent and to appoint a successor. *Preliminary, subject to change. OPTIONAL REDEMPTION At the option of the City, the Bonds maturing on or after February 1, 2036 shall be subject to optional redemption prior to maturity on February 1, 2035 or any date thereafter, at a price of par plus accrued interest to the date of optional redemption. 1 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 28 Redemption may be in whole or in part of the Bonds subject to prepayment. If redemption is in part, the selection of the amounts and maturities of the Bonds to be redeemed shall be at the discretion of the City. If only part of the Bonds having a common maturity date are called for redemption, then the City or Paying Agent, if any, will notify DTC of the particular amount of such maturity to be redeemed. DTC will determine by lot the amount of each participant's interest in such maturity to be redeemed and each participant will then select by lot the beneficial ownership interest in such maturity to be redeemed. Notice of redemption shall be sent by mail not more than 60 days and not less than 30 days prior to the date fixed for redemption to the registered owner of each Bond to be redeemed at the address shown on the registration books. AUTHORITY; PURPOSE The Bonds are being issued pursuant to Section 6.15 of the City Charter of the City, and Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 444 and 475, as amended, by the City, for the purposes of financing capital projects in the City and water utility improvements, including Phase II of the Cedar Lake and Louisiana road and utility reconstruction, the 2026 pavement management projects and Connect the Park projects and improvements to the Police Department Facility (further breakout of portions listed below). ESTIMATED SOURCES AND USES* Sources City Project Portion Utility Revenue Portion Total Bond Issue Par Amount of Bonds $7,365,000 $2,565,000 $9,930,000 Total Sources $7,365,000 $2,565,000 $9,930,000 Uses Total Underwriter's Discount (1.200%) $88,380 $30,780 $119,160 Costs of Issuance 91,228 31,772 123,000 Deposit to Construction Fund 7,185,000 2,500,000 9,685,000 Rounding Amount 392 2,448 2,840 Total Uses $7,365,000 $2,565,000 $9,930,000 *Preliminary, subject to change. 2 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 29 Breakdown of Principal Payments*: Payment Date City Project Portion Utility Revenue Portion Total Bond Issue 2/01/2028 $275,000 $185,000 $460,000 2/01/2029 420,000 230,000 650,000 2/01/2030 435,000 240,000 675,000 2/01/2031 450,000 245,000 695,000 2/01/2032 460,000 255,000 715,000 2/01/2033 480,000 265,000 745,000 2/01/2034 490,000 275,000 765,000 2/01/2035 515,000 280,000 795,000 2/01/2036 530,000 290,000 820,000 2/01/2037 545,000 300,000 845,000 2/01/2038 510,000 - 510,000 2/01/2039 535,000 - 535,000 2/01/2040 550,000 - 550,000 2/01/2041 575,000 - 575,000 2/01/2042 595,000 - 595,000 Total $7,365,000 $2,565,000 $9,930,000 *Preliminary, subject to change. SECURITY The Bonds will be general obligations of the City for which its full faith and credit and taxing powers are pledged without limitation as to rate or amount. The City anticipates that the debt service on the City Project Portion of the Bonds will be paid from ad valorem property taxes. In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, the City will levy each year an amount not less than 105% of the debt service requirements on the City Project Portion of the Bonds. In the event funds on hand for payment of principal and interest are at any time insufficient, the City is required to levy an additional ad valorem tax upon all taxable properties within its boundaries without limit as to rate or amount to make up any deficiency. The City anticipates that the debt service on the Utility Revenue Portion of the Bonds will be paid entirely from net revenues of the water system ("utility revenues") which is owned and operated by the City. In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, receipt of utility revenues will be sufficient to provide not less than 105% of principal and interest on the Utility Revenue Portion of the Bonds. Should the utility revenues and/or ad valorem property taxes pledged for payment of the Bonds be insufficient to pay the principal and interest as the same shall become due, the City is required to pay maturing principal and interest from moneys on hand in any other fund of the City not pledged for another purpose and/or to levy a tax for this purpose upon all the taxable property in the City, without limitation as to rate or amount. 3 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 30 RATING General obligation debt of the City, with the exception of any outstanding credit enhanced issues, is currently rated "AAA"/Stable outlook by S&P Global Ratings ("S&P"). The City has requested a rating on the Bonds from S&P, and bidders will be notified as to the assigned rating prior to the sale. Such rating reflects only the views of such organization and explanations of the significance of such rating may be obtained from S&P. Generally, a rating agency bases its rating on the information and materials furnished to it and on investigations, studies and assumptions of its own. There is no assurance that such rating will continue for any given period of time or that it will not be revised downward or withdrawn entirely by such rating agency, if in the judgment of such rating agency circumstances so warrant. Any such downward revision or withdrawal of such rating may have an adverse effect on the market price of the Bonds. Such rating is not to be construed as a recommendation of the rating agency to buy, sell or hold the Bonds, and the rating assigned by the rating agency should be evaluated independently. Except as may be required by the Disclosure Undertaking described under the heading "CONTINUING DISCLOSURE" neither the City nor the underwriter undertake responsibility to bring to the attention of the owner of the Bonds any proposed changes in or withdrawal of such rating or to oppose any such revision or withdrawal. CONTINUING DISCLOSURE In order to assist brokers, dealers, and municipal securities dealers, in connection with their participation in the offering of the Bonds, to comply with Rule 15c2-12 promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Rule"), the City shall agree to provide certain information to the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board ("MSRB") through its Electronic Municipal Market Access ("EMMA") system, or any system that may be prescribed in the future. The Rule was last amended, effective February 27, 2019, to include an expanded list of material events. On the date of issue and delivery, the City shall execute and deliver a Continuing Disclosure Certificate, under which the City will covenant for the benefit of holders including beneficial holders, to provide electronically, or in a manner otherwise prescribed, certain financial information annually and to provide notices of the occurrence of certain events enumerated in the Rule (the "Disclosure Undertaking"). The details and terms of the Disclosure Undertaking for the City are set forth in Appendix D. Such Disclosure Undertaking will be in substantially the form attached hereto. A failure by the City to comply with any Disclosure Undertaking will not constitute an event of default on the Bonds. However, such a failure may adversely affect the transferability and liquidity of the Bonds and their market price. In the previous five years, the City believes it has not failed to comply in all material respects with its prior undertakings under the Rule. The City has reviewed its continuing disclosure responsibilities along with any changes to the Rule, to ensure compliance. Ehlers is currently engaged as dissemination agent for the City. 4 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 31 LEGAL OPINION An opinion as to the validity of the Bonds and the exemption from taxation of the interest thereon will be furnished by Kutak Rock LLP, Minneapolis, Minnesota, Bond Counsel to the City ("Bond Counsel"), and will be available at the time of delivery of the Bonds. The legal opinion will state that the Bonds are valid and binding general obligations of the City; provided that the rights of the owners of the Bonds and the enforceability of the Bonds may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium, and other similar laws affecting creditors' rights and by equitable principles (which may be applied in either a legal or equitable proceeding). See "FORM OF LEGAL OPINION" found in Appendix B. Bond Counsel has not participated in the preparation of this Official Statement and is not passing upon its accuracy, completeness, or sufficiency. Bond Counsel has not examined or verified, nor attempted to examine or verify, any of the financial or statistical statements or data contained in this Official Statement and will express no opinion with respect thereto. TAX MATTERS General Matters. In the opinion of Kutak Rock LLP, Bond Counsel, under existing laws, regulations, rulings and judicial decisions, interest on the Bonds [(including any original issue discount properly allocable to the owner of a Bond)] is excludable from gross income for federal income tax purposes and is not a specific preference item for purposes of the federal alternative minimum tax imposed on individuals. Further, and to the extent of the aforementioned federal income tax exclusion, interest on the Bonds is excludable from taxable net income of individuals, trusts, and estates for Minnesota income tax purposes, and is not a preference item for purposes of the computation of the Minnesota alternative minimum tax imposed on individuals, trusts, and estates. The opinions described above assume the accuracy of certain representations and compliance by the City with covenants designed to satisfy the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), that must be met subsequent to the issuance of the Bonds. Failure to comply with such requirements could cause interest on the Bonds to be included in gross income for federal income tax purposes and in taxable net income for Minnesota income tax purposes, retroactive to the date of issuance of the Bonds. The City has covenanted to comply with such requirements. Interest on the Bonds (a) may affect the federal alternative minimum tax imposed on certain corporations, and (b) is subject to Minnesota franchise taxes on certain corporations (including financial institutions) measured by income. Bond Counsel has expressed no opinion regarding other federal tax consequences arising with respect to the Bonds. The accrual or receipt of interest on the Bonds may otherwise affect the federal income tax liability of the owners of the Bonds. The extent of these other tax consequences will depend on such owners' particular tax status and other items of income or deduction. Bond Counsel has expressed no opinion regarding any such consequences. Purchasers of the Bonds, particularly purchasers that are corporations (including S corporations, foreign corporations operating branches in the United States of America, and certain corporations subject to the alternative minimum tax imposed on corporations), property or casualty insurance companies, banks, thrifts or other financial institutions, certain recipients of social security or railroad retirement benefits, taxpayers entitled to claim the earned income credit, taxpayers entitled to claim the refundable credit in Section 36B of the Code for coverage under a qualified health plan or taxpayers who may be deemed to have incurred or continued indebtedness to purchase or carry tax-exempt obligations, should consult their tax advisors as to the tax consequences of purchasing or owning the Bonds. A copy of the form of opinion of Bond Counsel is attached hereto as Appendix B. 5 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 32 Original Issue Discount. The Bonds that have an original yield above their respective interest rates, if any, as shown on the inside cover of this Official Statement (collectively, the "Discount Bonds"), are being sold at an original issue discount. The difference between the initial public offering prices of such Discount Bonds and their stated amounts to be paid at maturity (excluding "qualified stated interest" within the meaning of Section 1.1273-1 of the Treasury Regulations) constitutes original issue discount treated in the same manner for federal income tax purposes as interest, as described above. The amount of original issue discount that is treated as having accrued with respect to a Discount Bond is added to the cost basis of the owner of the bond in determining, for federal income tax purposes, gain or loss upon disposition of such Discount Bond (including its sale, redemption or payment at maturity). Amounts received on disposition of such Discount Bond that are attributable to accrued or otherwise recognized original issue discount will be treated as tax-exempt interest, rather than as taxable gain, for federal income tax purposes. Original issue discount is treated as compounding semiannually, at a rate determined by reference to the yield to maturity of each individual Discount Bond, on days that are determined by reference to the maturity date of such Discount Bond. The amount treated as original issue discount on such Discount Bond for a particular semiannual accrual period is equal to (a) the product of (i) the yield to maturity for such Discount Bond (determined by compounding at the close of each accrual period) and (ii) the amount that would have been the tax basis of such Discount Bond at the beginning of the particular accrual period if held by the original purchaser, less (b) the amount of any interest payable for such Discount Bond during the accrual period. The tax basis for purposes of the preceding sentence is determined by adding to the initial public offering price on such Discount Bond the sum of the amounts that have been treated as original issue discount for such purposes during all prior periods. If such Discount Bond is sold between semiannual compounding dates, original issue discount that would have been accrued for that semiannual compounding period for federal income tax purposes is to be apportioned in equal amounts among the days in such compounding period. Owners of Discount Bonds should consult their tax advisors with respect to the determination and treatment of original issue discount accrued as of any date and with respect to the state and local tax consequences of owning a Discount Bond. Subsequent purchasers of Discount Bonds that purchase such bonds for a price that is higher or lower than the "adjusted issue price" of the bonds at the time of purchase should consult their tax advisors as to the effect on the accrual of original issue discount. Original Issue Premium. The Bonds that have an original yield below their respective interest rates, if any, as shown on the inside cover of this Official Statement (collectively, the "Premium Bonds"), are being sold at a premium. An amount equal to the excess of the issue price of a Premium Bond over its stated redemption price at maturity constitutes premium on such Premium Bond. A purchaser of a Premium Bond must amortize any premium over such Premium Bond's term using constant yield principles, based on the purchaser's yield to maturity (or, in the case of Premium Bonds callable prior to their maturity, generally by amortizing the premium to the call date, based on the purchaser's yield to the call date and giving effect to any call premium). As premium is amortized, the amount of the amortization offsets a corresponding amount of interest for the period, and the purchaser's basis in such Premium Bond is reduced by a corresponding amount resulting in an increase in the gain (or decrease in the loss) to be recognized for federal income tax purposes upon a sale or disposition of such Premium Bond prior to its maturity. Even though the purchaser's basis may be reduced, no federal income tax deduction is allowed. Purchasers of the Premium Bonds should consult their tax advisors with respect to the determination and treatment of premium for federal income tax purposes and with respect to the state and local tax consequences of owning a Premium Bond. 6 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 33 Bank Qualified. The City has represented that it does not reasonably anticipate issuing greater than $10,000,000 of tax-exempt obligations in calendar year 2026 (excluding certain private activity and refunding bonds) and that it has designated the Bonds as "qualified tax-exempt obligations" within the meaning of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code. Accordingly, assuming the accuracy of such representations, in the case of certain banks, thrift institutions or other financial institutions owning the Bonds, a deduction is allowed for 80 percent of that portion of such institutions' interest expense allocable to interest on such bonds. Bond Counsel has expressed no opinion with respect to any deduction for federal tax law purposes of interest on indebtedness incurred or continued by an owner of the Bonds or a related person to purchase or carry such bonds. Backup Withholding An owner of a Bond may be subject to backup withholding at the applicable rate determined by statute with respect to interest paid with respect to the Bonds if such owner fails to provide to any person required to collect such information pursuant to Section 6049 of the Code with such owner's taxpayer identification number, furnishes an incorrect taxpayer identification number, fails to report interest, dividends or other "reportable payments" (as defined in the Code) properly, or, under certain circumstances, fails to provide such persons with a certified statement, under penalty of perjury, that such owner is not subject to backup withholding. Changes in Federal and State Tax Law From time to time, there are legislative proposals in the Congress and in the states that, if enacted, could alter or amend the federal and state tax matters referred to under this heading "TAX MATTERS" or adversely affect the market value of the Bonds. It cannot be predicted whether or in what form any such proposal might be enacted or whether if enacted it would apply to bonds issued prior to enactment. In addition, regulatory actions are from time to time announced or proposed and litigation is threatened or commenced which, if implemented or concluded in a particular manner, could adversely affect the market value of the Bonds. It cannot be predicted whether any such regulatory action will be implemented, how any particular litigation or judicial action will be resolved, or whether the Bonds or the market value thereof would be impacted thereby. Purchasers of the Bonds should consult their tax advisors regarding any pending or proposed legislation, regulatory initiatives or litigation. The opinions expressed by Bond Counsel are based on existing legislation and regulations as interpreted by relevant judicial and regulatory authorities as of the date of issuance and delivery of the Bonds, and Bond Counsel has expressed no opinion as of any date subsequent thereto or with respect to any pending legislation, regulatory initiatives or litigation. PROSPECTIVE PURCHASERS OF THE BONDS ARE ADVISED TO CONSULT WITH THEIR OWN TAX ADVISORS PRIOR TO ANY PURCHASE OF THE BONDS AS TO THE IMPACT OF THE CODE UPON THEIR ACQUISITION, HOLDING OR DISPOSITION OF THE BONDS. QUALIFIED TAX-EXEMPT OBLIGATIONS The City will designate the Bonds as "qualified tax-exempt obligations" for purposes of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code relating to the ability of financial institutions to deduct from income for federal income tax purposes, interest expense that is allocable to carrying and acquiring tax-exempt obligations. 7 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 34 MUNICIPAL ADVISOR Ehlers has served as municipal advisor to the City in connection with the issuance of the Bonds. The Municipal Advisor cannot participate in the underwriting of the Bonds. The financial information included in this Preliminary Official Statement has been compiled by the Municipal Advisor. Such information does not purport to be a review, audit or certified forecast of future events and may not conform with accounting principles applicable to compilations of financial information. Ehlers is not a firm of certified public accountants. Ehlers is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the MSRB as a municipal advisor. Ehlers makes no representation, warranty or guarantee regarding the accuracy or completeness of the information in this Preliminary Official Statement, and its assistance in preparing this Preliminary Official Statement should not be construed as a representation that it has independently verified such information. MUNICIPAL ADVISOR AFFILIATED COMPANIES BTSC and Ehlers Investment Partners, LLC ("EIP") are affiliate companies of Ehlers. BTSC is chartered by the State of Minnesota and authorized in Minnesota, Wisconsin, Colorado, and Illinois to transact the business of a limited purpose trust company. BTSC provides paying agent services to debt issuers. EIP is a Registered Investment Advisor with the Securities and Exchange Commission. EIP assists issuers with the investment of bond proceeds or investing other issuer funds. This includes escrow bidding agent services. Issuers, such as the City, have retained or may retain BTSC and/or EIP to provide these services. If hired, BTSC and/or EIP would be retained by the City under an agreement separate from Ehlers. INDEPENDENT AUDITORS The basic financial statements of the City for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025 have been audited by Redpath and Company, LLC, St. Paul, Minnesota, independent auditors (the "Auditor"). The report of the Auditor, together with the basic financial statements, component units financial statements, and notes to the financial statements are attached hereto as "APPENDIX A – FINANCIAL STATEMENTS". The Auditor has not been engaged to perform and has not performed, since the date of its report included herein, any procedures on the financial statements addressed in that report. The Auditor also has not performed any procedures relating to this Preliminary Official Statement. RISK FACTORS The following is a description of possible risks to holders of the Bonds without weighting as to probability. This description of risks is not intended to be all-inclusive, and there may be other risks not now perceived or listed here. Taxes: The Bonds are general obligations of the City, the ultimate payment of which rests in the City's ability to levy and collect sufficient taxes to pay debt service should other revenue (utility revenues) be insufficient. In the event of delayed billing, collection or distribution of property taxes, sufficient funds may not be available to the City in time to pay debt service when due. State Actions: Many elements of local government finance, including the issuance of debt and the levy of property taxes, are controlled by state government. Future actions of the State of Minnesota (the "State") may affect the overall financial condition of the City, the taxable value of property within the City, and the ability of the City to levy and collect property taxes. 8 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 35 Future Changes in Law: Various State and federal laws, regulations and constitutional provisions apply to the City and to the Bonds. The City can give no assurance that there will not be a change in or interpretation of any such applicable laws, regulations and provisions which would have a material effect on the City or the taxing authority of the City. Ratings; Interest Rates: In the future, the City's credit rating may be reduced or withdrawn, or interest rates for this type of obligation may rise generally, either possibility resulting in a reduction in the value of the Bonds for resale prior to maturity. Tax Exemption: If the federal government or the State of Minnesota taxes all or a portion of the interest on municipal obligations, directly or indirectly, or if there is a change in federal or state tax policy, the value of the Bonds may fall for purposes of resale. Noncompliance following the issuance of the Bonds with certain requirements of the Code and covenants of the Award Resolution may result in the inclusion of interest on the Bonds in gross income of the recipient for United States income tax purposes or in taxable net income of individuals, estates or trusts for State of Minnesota income tax purposes. No provision has been made for redemption of the Bonds, or for an increase in the interest rate on the Bonds, in the event that interest on the Bonds becomes subject to federal or State of Minnesota income taxation, retroactive to the date of issuance. Continuing Disclosure: A failure by the City to comply with the Disclosure Undertaking for continuing disclosure (see "CONTINUING DISCLOSURE") will not constitute an event of default on the Bonds. Any such failure must be reported in accordance with the Rule and must be considered by any broker, dealer, or municipal securities dealer before recommending the purchase or sale of the Bonds in the secondary market. Such a failure may adversely affect the transferability and liquidity of the Bonds and their market price. Levy Limits: The State Legislature has periodically imposed limitations on the ability of municipalities to levy property taxes. While these limitations have expired, the potential exists for future legislation to limit the ability of local governments to levy property taxes. All previous limitations have not limited the ability to levy for the payment of debt service on bonded indebtedness. For more detailed information about Minnesota levy limits, contact the Minnesota Department of Revenue or Ehlers and Associates. State Economy; State Aids: State of Minnesota cash flow problems could affect local governments and possibly increase property taxes. Book-Entry-Only System: The timely credit of payments for principal and interest on the Bonds to the accounts of the Beneficial Owners of the Bonds may be delayed due to the customary practices, standing instructions or for other unknown reasons by DTC participants or indirect participants. Since the notice of redemption or other notices to holders of these obligations will be delivered by the City to DTC only, there may be a delay or failure by DTC, DTC participants or indirect participants to notify the Beneficial Owners of the Bonds. Economy: A combination of economic, climatic, political or civil disruptions or terrorist actions outside of the control of the City, including loss of major taxpayers or major employers, could affect the local economy and result in reduced tax collections and/or increased demands upon local government. Real or perceived threats to the financial stability of the City may have an adverse effect on the value of the Bonds in the secondary market. Secondary Market for the Bonds: No assurance can be given that a secondary market will develop for the purchase and sale of the Bonds or, if a secondary market exists, that such Bonds can be sold for any particular price. The underwriters are not obligated to engage in secondary market trading or to repurchase any of the Bonds at the request of the owners thereof. Prices of the Bonds as traded in the secondary market are subject to adjustment upward and downward in response to changes in the credit markets and other prevailing circumstances. No guarantee exists as to the future market value of the Bonds. Such market value could be substantially different from the original purchase price. 9 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 36 Bankruptcy: The rights and remedies of the holders may be limited by and are subject to the provisions of federal bankruptcy laws, to other laws, or equitable principles that may affect the enforcement of creditors' rights, to the exercise of judicial discretion in appropriate cases and to limitations on legal remedies against local governments. The opinion of Bond Counsel to be delivered with respect to the Bonds will be similarly qualified. Cybersecurity: The City is dependent on electronic information technology systems to deliver services. These systems may contain sensitive information or support critical operational functions which may have value for unauthorized purposes. As a result, the electronic systems and networks may be targets of cyberattack. There can be no assurance that the City will not experience an information technology breach or attack with financial consequences that could have a material adverse impact. The foregoing is intended only as a summary of certain risk factors attendant to an investment in the Bonds. In order for potential investors to identify risk factors and make an informed investment decision, potential investors should be thoroughly familiar with this entire Preliminary Official Statement and the Appendices hereto. 10 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 37 VALUATIONS OVERVIEW All non-exempt property is subject to taxation by local taxing districts. Exempt real property includes Indian lands, public property, and educational, religious and charitable institutions. Most personal property is exempt from taxation (except investor-owned utility mains, generating plants, etc.). The valuation of property in Minnesota consists of three elements. (1) The estimated market value is set by city or county assessors. Not less than 20% of all real properties are to be appraised by local assessors each year. (2) The taxable market value is the estimated market value adjusted by all legislative exclusions. (3) The tax capacity (taxable) value of property is determined by class rates set by the State Legislature. The tax capacity rate varies according to the classification of the property. Tax capacity represents a percent of taxable market value. The property tax rate for a local taxing jurisdiction is determined by dividing the total tax capacity or market value of property within the jurisdiction into the dollars to be raised from the levy. State law determines whether a levy is spread on tax capacity or market value. Major classifications and the percentages by which tax capacity is determined are: Type of Property 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 Residential homestead1 First $500,000 - 1.00% Over $500,000 - 1.25% First $500,000 - 1.00% Over $500,000 - 1.25% First $500,000 - 1.00% Over $500,000 - 1.25% Agricultural homestead1 First $500,000 HGA - 1.00% Over $500,000 HGA - 1.25% First $2,150,000 - 0.50% 2 Over $2,150,000 - 1.00% 2 First $500,000 HGA - 1.00% Over $500,000 HGA - 1.25% First $3,500,000 - 0.50% 2 Over $3,500,000 - 1.00% 2 First $500,000 HGA - 1.00% Over $500,000 HGA - 1.25% First $3,500,000 - 0.50% 2 Over $3,500,000 - 1.00% 2 Agricultural non-homestead Land - 1.00% 2 Land - 1.00% 2 Land - 1.00% 2 Seasonal recreational residential First $500,000 - 1.00% 3 Over $500,000 - 1.25% 3 First $500,000 - 1.00% 3 Over $500,000 - 1.25% 3 First $500,000 - 1.00% 3 Over $500,000 - 1.25% 3 Residential non-homestead: 1 unit - 1st $500,000 - 1.00% Over $500,000 - 1.25% 2-3 units - 1.25% 4 or more - 1.25% Small City4 - 1.25% Affordable Rental: First $174,000 - 0.75% Over $174,000 - 0.25% 1 unit - 1st $500,000 - 1.00% Over $500,000 - 1.25% 2-3 units - 1.25% 4 or more - 1.25% Small City 4 - 1.25% Affordable Rental: – 0.25% 1 unit - 1st $500,000 - 1.00% Over $500,000 - 1.25% 2-3 units - 1.25% 4 or more - 1.25% Small City 4 - 1.25% Affordable Rental – 0.25% Industrial/Commercial/Utility5 First $150,000 - 1.50% Over $150,000 - 2.00% First $150,000 - 1.50% Over $150,000 - 2.00% First $150,000 - 1.50% Over $150,000 - 2.00% 1 A residential property qualifies as "homestead" if it is occupied by the owner or a relative of the owner on the assessment date. 2 Applies to land and buildings. Exempt from referendum market value tax. 3 Exempt from referendum market value tax. 4 Cities of 5,000 population or less and located entirely outside the seven-county metropolitan area and the adjacent nine-county area and whose boundaries are 15 miles or more from the boundaries of a Minnesota city with a population of over 5,000. 5 The estimated market value of utility property is determined by the Minnesota Department of Revenue. 11 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 38 CURRENT PROPERTY VALUATIONS 2025/26 Economic Market Value $10,457,953,994 1 2025/26 Assessor's Estimated Market Value Real Estate $9,958,327,800 Personal Property 22,100,400 Total Valuation $9,980,428,200 2025/26 Net Tax Capacity Real Estate $120,310,848 Personal Property 434,466 Net Tax Capacity $120,745,314 Less: Captured Tax Increment Tax Capacity2 (10,973,667) Fiscal Disparities Contribution 3 (13,167,503) Taxable Net Tax Capacity $96,604,144 Plus: Fiscal Disparities Distribution3 7,466,166 Adjusted Taxable Net Tax Capacity $104,070,310 1 According to the Minnesota Department of Revenue, the Assessor's Estimated Market Value (the "AEMV") for the City was about 95.97% of the actual selling prices of property sold in the City. The sales ratio was calculated by comparing the selling prices with the AEMV. Dividing the AEMV of real estate by the sales ratio and adding the AEMV of personal property and utility, railroads and minerals, if any, results in an Economic Market Value ("EMV") for the City of $10,457,953,994. 2 The captured tax increment value shown above represents the captured net tax capacity of tax increment financing districts in the City. 3 Each community in the seven-county metropolitan area contributes 40% of the growth in its commercial- industrial property tax base to an area pool which is then distributed among the municipalities on the basis of population, special needs, etc. Each governmental unit makes a contribution and receives a distribution-- sometimes gaining and sometimes contributing net tax capacity for tax purposes. 12 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 39 2025/26 NET TAX CAPACITY BY CLASSIFICATION 2025/26 Net Tax Capacity Percent of Total Net Tax Capacity Residential homestead $60,927,868 50.46% Commercial/industrial 36,326,209 30.09% Public utility 248,308 0.21% Railroad operating property 571,222 0.47% Non-homestead residential 22,028,532 18.24% Commercial & residential seasonal/rec.12,296 0.01% Other 196,413 0.16% Personal property 434,466 0.36% Total $120,745,314 100.00% TREND OF VALUATIONS Levy Year Assessor's Estimated Market Value Assessor's Taxable Market Value Net Tax Capacity1 Adjusted Taxable Net Tax Capacity2 Percent Increase/Decrease in Estimated Market Value 2021/22 $8,555,110,800 $8,428,814,718 $106,119,396 $87,256,766 4.28% 2022/23 9,427,743,400 9,329,350,550 116,626,650 96,682,406 10.20% 2023/24 9,748,879,700 9,650,904,194 120,912,490 101,064,612 3.41% 2024/25 9,926,673,200 9,738,161,288 121,168,959 100,607,002 1.82% 2025/26 9,980,428,200 9,799,012,607 120,745,314 104,070,310 0.54% 1 Net Tax Capacity is before fiscal disparities adjustments and includes tax increment values. 2 Adjusted Taxable Net Tax Capacity is after fiscal disparities adjustments and does not include tax increment values. 13 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 40 LARGEST TAXPAYING PARCELS1 Taxpayer Type of Property 2025/26 Net Tax Capacity Percent of City's Total Net Tax Capacity BOF III Minnesota 10 West End LLC Commercial $1,791,950 1.48% ACCESO Acquisitions LLC Commercial 1,499,250 1.24% BOF II Minnesota W End Off Pk LLC Commercial 1,467,720 1.22% Excelsior & Grand Apts LLC Apartment 1,409,340 1.17% MSP West End LLC Commercial 1,251,930 1.04% Park Nicollet Real Estate Commercial 1,232,124 1.02% Knollwood MZL LLC Commercial 1,056,250 0.87% Beltline Residences LLC Apartment 809,048 0.67% 4800 Excelsior Apartments Apartment 714,920 0.59% Bel Verge LLC Apartment 651,375 0.54% Total $11,883,907 9.84% City's Total 2025/26 Net Tax Capacity $120,745,314 Source:Current Property Valuations, Net Tax Capacity by Classification, Trend of Valuations and Largest Taxpaying Parcels have been furnished by Hennepin County. 1 Hennepin County has provided the largest taxpaying parcels which appear on the tax rolls of Hennepin County, and therefore the information stated above may not be reflective of the entire valuation of all parcels and may not include all classifications of property. 14 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 41 DEBT DIRECT DEBT1 General Obligation Debt (see schedules following) Total G.O. debt secured by housing improvement area fees $5,405,000 Total G.O. debt secured by housing revenues 1,045,000 Total G.O. debt secured by tax abatement revenues 12,460,000 Total G.O. debt secured by taxes (includes the City Project Portion of the Bonds)* 40,705,000 Total G.O. debt secured by utility revenues (includes the Utility Revenue Portion of the Bonds)*22,295,000 Total General Obligation Debt*$81,910,000 *Preliminary, subject to change. DEBT PAYMENT HISTORY The City has no record of default in the payment of principal and interest on its debt. FUTURE FINANCING The City anticipates issuing general obligation bonds for capital projects in the next 12 months. The City also anticipates issuing conduit debt for development projects, and the timing of this issuance and project is estimated for 2027; however, the size and scope of these projects is not yet known. 1 Outstanding debt is as of the dated date of the Bonds. 15 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 42 DEBT LIMIT The statutory limit on net debt of Minnesota municipalities other than school districts or cities of the first class (Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.53, subd. 1) is 3% of the Assessor's Estimated Market Value of all taxable property within its boundaries. "Net debt" means the amount remaining after deducting from gross debt the amount of current revenues which are applicable within the current fiscal year to the payment of any debt and the aggregate principal of certain obligations enumerated under Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.51, subd. 4, including the following: (1) obligations issued for improvements payable wholly or partly from special assessments levied against benefitted property; (2) warrants or orders having no definite or fixed maturity; (3) obligations payable wholly from the income of revenue producing conveniences (includes the Utility Revenue Portion of the Bonds); (4) obligations issued to create or maintain a permanent improvement revolving fund; (5) obligations issued to finance any revenue producing public convenience; (6) funds held as sinking funds for payment of principal and interest on debt other than those deductible under Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.51, subd. 4; (7) obligations to repay energy conservation investment loans under Minnesota Statutes, Section 216C.37; (8) obligations issued to pay certain postemployment benefit liabilities; (9) obligations issued to pay certain judgments against the City; and (10) all other obligations which are not to be included in computing the net debt of a municipality under the provisions of the law authorizing their issuance. 2025/26 Assessor's Estimated Market Value $9,980,428,200 Multiply by 3%0.03 Statutory Debt Limit $299,412,846 Less: Long-Term Debt Outstanding Being Paid Solely from Taxes (includes the City Project Portion of the Bonds)*(40,705,000) Unused Debt Limit*$258,707,846 *Preliminary, subject to change. 16 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 43 City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota Schedule of Bonded Indebtedness General Obligation Debt Secured by Housing Improvement Area Fees (As of 07/28/2026) Dated Amount Maturity Calendar Year Ending Principal Interest Principal Interest Principal Interest Total Principal Total Interest Total P & I Principal Outstanding % Paid Calendar Year Ending 2026 0 9,771 0 4,368 0 89,464 0 103,603 103,603 5,405,000 .00%2026 2027 70,000 18,458 285,000 5,743 190,000 174,653 545,000 198,853 743,853 4,860,000 10.08%2027 2028 70,000 16,183 125,000 1,375 200,000 165,878 395,000 183,435 578,435 4,465,000 17.39%2028 2029 75,000 13,718 205,000 157,790 280,000 171,508 451,508 4,185,000 22.57%2029 2030 75,000 11,036 215,000 150,440 290,000 161,476 451,476 3,895,000 27.94%2030 2031 80,000 8,130 220,000 142,773 300,000 150,903 450,903 3,595,000 33.49%2031 2032 85,000 4,973 230,000 134,728 315,000 139,700 454,700 3,280,000 39.32%2032 2033 85,000 1,658 235,000 126,123 320,000 127,780 447,780 2,960,000 45.24%2033 2034 245,000 117,003 245,000 117,003 362,003 2,715,000 49.77%2034 2035 255,000 107,248 255,000 107,248 362,248 2,460,000 54.49%2035 2036 265,000 96,848 265,000 96,848 361,848 2,195,000 59.39%2036 2037 275,000 85,979 275,000 85,979 360,979 1,920,000 64.48%2037 2038 290,000 74,538 290,000 74,538 364,538 1,630,000 69.84%2038 2039 300,000 62,440 300,000 62,440 362,440 1,330,000 75.39%2039 2040 310,000 49,783 310,000 49,783 359,783 1,020,000 81.13%2040 2041 325,000 36,444 325,000 36,444 361,444 695,000 87.14%2041 2042 340,000 22,313 340,000 22,313 362,313 355,000 93.43%2042 2043 355,000 7,544 355,000 7,544 362,544 0 100.00%2043 540,000 83,925 410,000 11,485 4,455,000 1,801,983 5,405,000 1,897,393 7,302,393 Taxable Housing Improvement Area Bonds Series 2022B 09/07/2022 $4,900,000 02/01 Taxable Housing Imp. Area Ref. Bonds Series 2019C 11/26/2019 $2,200,000 02/01 Taxable Housing Improvement Area Bonds Series 2012A 10/17/2012 $1,290,000 02/01 17 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 44 City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota Schedule of Bonded Indebtedness General Obligation Debt Secured by Housing Revenues (As of 07/28/2026) Dated Amount Maturity Calendar Year Ending Principal Interest Total Principal Total Interest Total P & I Principal Outstanding % Paid Calendar Year Ending 2026 0 20,771 0 20,771 20,771 1,045,000 .00%2026 2027 80,000 39,941 80,000 39,941 119,941 965,000 7.66%2027 2028 80,000 36,741 80,000 36,741 116,741 885,000 15.31%2028 2029 85,000 33,441 85,000 33,441 118,441 800,000 23.44%2029 2030 85,000 30,126 85,000 30,126 115,126 715,000 31.58%2030 2031 90,000 26,801 90,000 26,801 116,801 625,000 40.19%2031 2032 95,000 23,286 95,000 23,286 118,286 530,000 49.28%2032 2033 100,000 19,481 100,000 19,481 119,481 430,000 58.85%2033 2034 100,000 15,481 100,000 15,481 115,481 330,000 68.42%2034 2035 105,000 11,381 105,000 11,381 116,381 225,000 78.47%2035 2036 110,000 7,013 110,000 7,013 117,013 115,000 89.00%2036 2037 115,000 2,372 115,000 2,372 117,372 0 100.00%2037 1,045,000 266,836 1,045,000 266,836 1,311,836 Refunding Bonds Series 2022A 06/21/2022 $1,345,000 02/01 18 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 45 City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota Schedule of Bonded Indebtedness General Obligation Debt Secured by Tax Abatement Revenues (As of 07/28/2026) Dated Amount Maturity Calendar Year Ending Principal Interest Total Principal Total Interest Total P & I Principal Outstanding % Paid Calendar Year Ending 2026 0 189,866 0 189,866 189,866 12,460,000 .00%2026 2027 190,000 375,931 190,000 375,931 565,931 12,270,000 1.52%2027 2028 1,370,000 344,731 1,370,000 344,731 1,714,731 10,900,000 12.52%2028 2029 1,425,000 295,956 1,425,000 295,956 1,720,956 9,475,000 23.96%2029 2030 1,470,000 252,531 1,470,000 252,531 1,722,531 8,005,000 35.75%2030 2031 1,515,000 209,650 1,515,000 209,650 1,724,650 6,490,000 47.91%2031 2032 1,555,000 167,438 1,555,000 167,438 1,722,438 4,935,000 60.39%2032 2033 1,595,000 123,128 1,595,000 123,128 1,718,128 3,340,000 73.19%2033 2034 1,645,000 75,525 1,645,000 75,525 1,720,525 1,695,000 86.40%2034 2035 1,695,000 25,425 1,695,000 25,425 1,720,425 0 100.00%2035 12,460,000 2,060,181 12,460,000 2,060,181 14,520,181 1) This represents the $12,460,000 Tax Abatement portion of the $22,220,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2019A. Tax Abatement Bonds 1) Series 2019A 04/10/2019 $12,460,000 02/01 19 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 46 City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota Schedule of Bonded Indebtedness General Obligation Debt Secured by Taxes (As of 07/28/2026) Dated Amount Maturity Calendar Year Ending Principal Interest Principal Interest Principal Interest Principal Interest Principal Interest 2026 0 9,384 0 8,369 0 10,350 0 91,125 0 85,050 2027 1,155,000 9,384 380,000 12,700 225,000 17,325 865,000 164,950 645,000 153,975 2028 385,000 4,331 230,000 10,500 895,000 129,750 675,000 120,975 2029 235,000 3,525 935,000 97,825 705,000 86,475 2030 965,000 69,325 745,000 57,675 2031 360,000 49,900 765,000 35,025 2032 370,000 39,863 785,000 11,775 2033 380,000 29,313 2034 390,000 18,000 2035 405,000 6,075 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 1,155,000 18,769 765,000 25,400 690,000 41,700 5,565,000 696,125 4,320,000 550,950 1) This represents the $3,430,000 City Charter portion of the $9,900,000 General Obligation Bonds Series 2017A. 2) This represents the $2,020,000 City Charter portion of the $8,800,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2018A. 3) This represents the $9,760,000 City Charter portion of the $22,220,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2019A. 4) This represents the $7,585,000 Refunding portion of the $15,105,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2019B. --Continued on next page Refunding Bonds 4) Series 2019B 11/26/2019 $7,585,000 02/01 G.O. Bonds 3) Series 2019A 04/10/2019 $9,760,000 02/01 G.O. Bonds 2) Series 2018A 06/14/2018 $2,020,000 02/01 G.O. Bonds 1) Series 2017A 07/13/2017 $3,430,000 02/01 G.O. Bonds Series 2016A 07/14/2016 $10,000,000 02/01 20 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 47 City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota Schedule of Bonded Indebtedness continued General Obligation Debt Secured by Taxes (As of 07/28/2026) Dated Amount Maturity Calendar Year Ending Principal Interest Principal Interest Principal Interest Principal Estimated Interest Total Principal Total Interest Total P & I Principal Outstanding % Paid Calendar Year Ending 2026 0 112,475 0 82,834 0 67,975 0 0 0 467,562 467,562 40,705,000 .00% 2026 2027 590,000 213,150 915,000 156,518 265,000 129,325 0 262,406 5,040,000 1,119,733 6,159,733 35,665,000 12.38% 2027 2028 615,000 189,050 935,000 138,018 285,000 115,575 275,000 255,975 4,295,000 964,174 5,259,174 31,370,000 22.93% 2028 2029 645,000 163,850 955,000 119,118 300,000 100,950 420,000 245,098 4,195,000 816,840 5,011,840 27,175,000 33.24% 2029 2030 670,000 137,550 975,000 99,818 315,000 85,575 435,000 231,631 4,105,000 681,574 4,786,574 23,070,000 43.32% 2030 2031 695,000 113,725 995,000 84,346 135,000 74,325 450,000 217,468 3,400,000 574,789 3,974,789 19,670,000 51.68% 2031 2032 715,000 96,150 1,005,000 72,344 145,000 67,325 460,000 202,565 3,480,000 490,021 3,970,021 16,190,000 60.23% 2032 2033 405,000 84,950 875,000 60,156 150,000 59,950 480,000 186,935 2,290,000 421,304 2,711,304 13,900,000 65.85% 2033 2034 410,000 76,800 575,000 49,938 160,000 52,200 490,000 170,565 2,025,000 367,503 2,392,503 11,875,000 70.83% 2034 2035 420,000 68,500 580,000 40,913 165,000 44,075 515,000 153,351 2,085,000 312,914 2,397,914 9,790,000 75.95% 2035 2036 430,000 60,000 590,000 30,300 175,000 35,575 530,000 135,060 1,725,000 260,935 1,985,935 8,065,000 80.19% 2036 2037 435,000 51,350 605,000 18,350 185,000 27,500 545,000 115,706 1,770,000 212,906 1,982,906 6,295,000 84.54% 2037 2038 445,000 42,550 615,000 6,150 190,000 20,000 510,000 96,325 1,760,000 165,025 1,925,025 4,535,000 88.86% 2038 2039 455,000 33,550 200,000 12,200 535,000 76,859 1,190,000 122,609 1,312,609 3,345,000 91.78% 2039 2040 465,000 24,350 205,000 4,100 550,000 56,378 1,220,000 84,828 1,304,828 2,125,000 94.78% 2040 2041 475,000 14,950 575,000 34,715 1,050,000 49,665 1,099,665 1,075,000 97.36% 2041 2042 480,000 5,100 595,000 11,751 1,075,000 16,851 1,091,851 0 100.00% 2042 8,350,000 1,488,050 9,620,000 958,800 2,875,000 896,650 7,365,000 2,452,787 40,705,000 7,129,231 47,834,231 * Preliminary, subject to change. 5) This represents the $10,505,000 Levy portion of the $15,540,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2020A. 6) This represents the $7,365,000 City Projects Portion of the $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2026A. G.O. Bonds 6) Series 2026A 07/28/2026 $7,365,000* 02/01 G.O. Bonds Series 2024A 06/25/2024 $3,050,000 02/01 G.O. Bonds Series 2021A 04/15/2021 $12,385,000 02/01 G.O. Bonds 5) Series 2020A 11/10/2020 $10,505,000 02/01 21 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 48 City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota Schedule of Bonded Indebtedness General Obligation Debt Secured by Utility Revenues (As of 07/28/2026) Dated Amount Maturity Calendar Year Ending Principal Interest Principal Interest Principal Interest Principal Interest Principal Interest 2026 0 34,013 0 53,550 0 77,075 0 51,875 0 110,900 2027 340,000 64,413 465,000 100,125 800,000 134,150 315,000 97,450 305,000 215,700 2028 350,000 56,863 475,000 86,025 845,000 93,025 325,000 84,650 315,000 203,300 2029 360,000 48,425 500,000 71,400 880,000 49,900 340,000 71,350 325,000 190,500 2030 365,000 39,363 510,000 56,250 930,000 13,950 355,000 57,450 340,000 177,200 2031 375,000 29,175 525,000 40,725 365,000 44,875 355,000 163,300 2032 390,000 17,700 540,000 24,750 380,000 35,600 370,000 148,800 2033 395,000 5,925 555,000 8,325 385,000 27,950 385,000 133,700 2034 395,000 20,150 400,000 118,000 2035 400,000 12,200 415,000 101,700 2036 410,000 4,100 430,000 84,800 2037 450,000 67,200 2038 465,000 48,900 2039 485,000 29,900 2040 505,000 10,100 2,575,000 295,875 3,570,000 441,150 3,455,000 368,100 3,670,000 507,650 5,545,000 1,804,000 1) This represents the $6,470,000 Utility & Refunding portions of the $9,900,000 General Obligation Bonds Series 2017A. 2) This represents the $6,780,000 Utility Revenue portion of the $8,800,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2018A. 3) This represents the $7,520,000 Utility Revenue portion of the $15,105,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2019B. 4) This represents the $5,035,000 Utility Revenue portion of the $15,540,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2020A. --Continued on next page Utility Revenue Bonds Series 2024B 09/12/2024 $5,750,000 02/01 Utility Revenue Bonds 4) Series 2020A 11/10/2020 $5,035,000 02/01 Utility Revenue Bonds 3) Series 2019B 11/26/2019 $7,520,000 02/01 Utility Revenue Bonds 2) Series 2018A 06/14/2018 $6,780,000 02/01 Utility & Refunding Bonds 1) Series 2017A 07/13/2017 $6,470,000 02/01 22 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 49 City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota Schedule of Bonded Indebtedness continued General Obligation Debt Secured by Utility Revenues (As of 07/28/2026) Dated Amount Maturity Calendar Year Ending Principal Interest Principal Estimated Interest Total Principal Total Interest Total P & I Principal Outstanding % Paid Calendar Year Ending 2026 0 41,503 0 0 0 368,915 368,915 22,295,000 .00% 2026 2027 55,000 43,225 0 86,767 2,280,000 741,830 3,021,830 20,015,000 10.23% 2027 2028 80,000 39,850 185,000 83,183 2,575,000 646,895 3,221,895 17,440,000 21.78% 2028 2029 80,000 35,850 230,000 76,693 2,715,000 544,118 3,259,118 14,725,000 33.95% 2029 2030 85,000 31,725 240,000 69,290 2,825,000 445,228 3,270,228 11,900,000 46.62% 2030 2031 90,000 27,350 245,000 61,529 1,955,000 366,954 2,321,954 9,945,000 55.39% 2031 2032 95,000 22,725 255,000 53,340 2,030,000 302,915 2,332,915 7,915,000 64.50% 2032 2033 100,000 17,850 265,000 44,694 2,085,000 238,444 2,323,444 5,830,000 73.85% 2033 2034 105,000 12,725 275,000 35,580 1,175,000 186,455 1,361,455 4,655,000 79.12% 2034 2035 110,000 7,350 280,000 26,075 1,205,000 147,325 1,352,325 3,450,000 84.53% 2035 2036 115,000 2,300 290,000 16,098 1,245,000 107,298 1,352,298 2,205,000 90.11% 2036 2037 300,000 5,475 750,000 72,675 822,675 1,455,000 93.47% 2037 2038 465,000 48,900 513,900 990,000 95.56% 2038 2039 485,000 29,900 514,900 505,000 97.73% 2039 2040 505,000 10,100 515,100 0 100.00% 2040 915,000 282,453 2,565,000 558,722 22,295,000 4,257,950 26,552,950 * Preliminary, subject to change. 5) This represents the $2,565,000 Utility Revenue Portion of the $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2026A. Utility Revenue Bonds 5) Series 2026A 07/28/2026 $2,565,000* 02/01 Utility Revenue Bonds Series 2025A 08/26/2025 $915,000 02/01 23 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 50 OVERLAPPING DEBT1 Taxing District 2025/26 Adjusted Taxable Net Tax Capacity % In City Total G.O. Debt2 City's Proportionate Share Hennepin County $2,885,601,120 3.6065% $1,222,750,000 3 $44,098,479 I.S.D. No. 270 (Hopkins Public Schools)178,327,306 2.5568% 202,225,000 4 5,170,489 I.S.D. No. 273 (Edina Public Schools)163,033,280 0.0605% 155,870,000 4 94,301 I.S.D. No. 283 (St. Louis Park Public Schools)100,014,144 99.3981% 223,545,000 4 222,199,483 Metropolitan Council 6,503,726,905 1.6002% 261,560,000 5 4,185,483 Three Rivers Park District 2,121,317,192 4.9059% 53,165,000 2,608,222 City's Share of Total Overlapping Debt $278,356,456 1 Overlapping debt is as of the dated date of the Bonds. Only those taxing jurisdictions with general obligation debt outstanding are included in this section. It does not include non-general obligation debt, self-supporting general obligation revenue debt, short-term general obligation debt, or general obligation tax/aid anticipation certificates of indebtedness. 2 Outstanding debt is based on information in Official Statements obtained on EMMA and the Municipal Advisor's records. 3 Hennepin County also has General Obligation Sales Tax Revenue Bonds (Ballpark Project) outstanding which are payable entirely from the proceeds of a dedicated 0.15% county-wide sales tax; and General Obligation Sales Tax Revenue Bonds (Transportation Sales Tax) which are expected to be paid from a 0.50% sales and use tax and a $20 per vehicle excise taxes. These issues have not been included in the overlapping debt or debt ratios. 4 Minnesota School Districts may qualify for aid from the State of Minnesota through the Debt Service Equalization Formula, School Building Bond Agricultural Credit and Long Term Facilities Maintenance Revenue programs. While some of the districts listed may receive these aids, Ehlers has not attempted to estimate the portion of debt service payments that would be financed by State aids for the purposes of the Bonds. 5 The above debt includes all outstanding general obligation debt supported by taxes of the Metropolitan Council. The Council also has general obligation wastewater revenue, grant anticipation notes and certificates of participation outstanding all of which are supported entirely by revenues and have not been included in the overlapping debt or debt ratios sections. 24 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 51 DEBT RATIOS G.O. Debt Debt/Economic Market Value $10,457,953,994 Debt/ Per Capita 50,3511 Direct G.O. Debt Secured By: Housing Improvement Area Fees $5,405,000 Housing Revenues 1,045,000 Tax Abatement Revenues 12,460,000 Taxes*40,705,000 Utility Revenues*22,295,000 Total General Obligation Debt*$81,910,000 Less: G.O. Debt Paid Entirely from Revenues2 (28,745,000) Tax Supported General Obligation Debt*$53,165,000 0.51% $1,055.89 City's Share of Total Overlapping Debt $278,356,456 2.66% $5,528.32 Total*$331,521,456 3.17% $6,584.21 *Preliminary, subject to change. 1 Preliminary estimated 2025 population. 2 Debt service on the City's general obligation revenue debt is being paid entirely from revenues and therefore is considered self-supporting debt. 25 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 52 TAX LEVIES, COLLECTIONS AND RATES TAX LEVIES AND COLLECTIONS Tax Year Net Tax Levy1 Total Collected Following Year Collected to Date % Collected 2021/22 $40,234,506 $39,908,823 $40,195,469 99.90% 2022/23 42,922,848 42,662,701 42,868,913 99.87% 2023/24 45,609,226 45,372,194 45,530,765 99.83% 2024/25 48,869,493 48,692,722 48,692,722 99.64% 2025/26 53,725,895 In process of collection Property taxes are collected in two installments in Minnesota--the first by May 15 and the second by October 15.2 Mobile home taxes are collectible in full by August 31. Minnesota Statutes require that levies (taxes and special assessments) for debt service be at least 105% of the actual debt service requirements to allow for delinquencies. 1 This reflects the Final Levy Certification of the City after all adjustments have been made. 2 Second half tax payments on agricultural property are due on November 15 of each year. 26 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 53 TAX CAPACITY RATES1 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 Hennepin County 38.535% 34.542% 34.681% 37.081% 39.242% City of St. Louis Park 46.424% 44.491% 45.915% 49.989% 51.751% I.S.D. No. 270 (Hopkins Public Schools)26.783% 25.006% 26.913% 25.439% 26.775% I.S.D. No. 273 (Edina Public Schools)29.975% 28.093% 28.248% 29.110% 30.273% I.S.D. No. 283 (St. Louis Park Public Schools) 24.913% 30.545% 29.269% 30.744% 30.309% Hennepin County HRA 0.771% 0.663% 0.624% 0.797% 0.768% Hennepin County RRA 1.329% 1.188% 1.153% 1.205% 1.177% Metropolitan Council 0.659% 0.576% 0.614% 0.567% 0.598% Metropolitan Mosquito 0.377% 0.331% 0.312% 0.328% 0.333% Metropolitan Transit 1.204% 1.066% 0.927% 1.134% 0.987% Park Museum 0.722% 0.647% 0.694% 0.744% 0.731% Three Rivers Park District 2.787% 2.473% 2.399% 2.471% 2.529% Referendum Market Value Rates: I.S.D. No. 270 (Hopkins Public Schools)0.14030% 0.14957% 0.13812% 0.14125% 0.15088% I.S.D. No. 273 (Edina Public Schools)0.21895% 0.22168% 0.20533% 0.20146% 0.20252% I.S.D. No. 283 (St. Louis Park Public Schools) 0.14838% 0.15920% 0.15544% 0.14148% 0.13964% Source: Tax Levies and Collections and Tax Capacity Rates have been furnished by Hennepin County. THE ISSUER CITY GOVERNMENT The City was organized as a municipality in 1886. The City operates under a home rule charter form of government consisting of a seven-member City Council of which the Mayor is a voting member. The City Manager, Finance Director and City Clerk are responsible for administrative details and financial records. 1 After reduction for State aids. Does not include the statewide general property tax against commercial/industrial, non-homestead resorts and seasonal recreational residential property. 27 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 54 EMPLOYEES; PENSIONS; UNIONS The City currently has 299 full-time, 64 part-time, and 40 seasonal employees. All full-time and certain part-time employees of the City are covered by defined benefit pension plans administered by the Public Employee Retirement Association of Minnesota (PERA). PERA administers the General Employees Retirement Fund (GERF) and the Public Employees Police and Fire Fund (PEPFF) which are cost-sharing multiple-employer retirement plans. PERA members belong to either the Coordinated Plan or the Basic Plan. Coordinated members are covered by Social Security. See the Notes to Financial Statements in Appendix A for a detailed description of the Plans. Recognized and Certified Bargaining Units Bargaining Unit Expiration Date of Current Contract IUOE Local 49 December 31, 2028 LELS Local 206 - Police December 31, 2028 LELS Local 2018 - Police Sergeants December 31, 2027 LELS Local 220 - Public Safety Dispatchers December 31, 2026 IAFF Local 993 - Fire December 31, 2028 LELS Local 482 - Police Lieutenants December 31, 2028 POST EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS The City has obligations for some post-employment benefits for its employees. Accounting for these obligations is dictated by Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 75 (GASB 75). The City's most recent Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (Audit) shows a total OPEB liability of $7,507,643 as of December 31, 2025. The City has been funding these obligations on a pay-as-you-go basis. Source: The City's most recent Audit. LITIGATION There is no litigation threatened or pending questioning the organization or boundaries of the City or the right of any of its officers to their respective offices or in any manner questioning their rights and power to execute and deliver the Bonds or otherwise questioning the validity of the Bonds. MUNICIPAL BANKRUPTCY Municipalities are prohibited from filing for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 (reorganization) or Chapter 7 (liquidation) of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (11 U.S.C. §§ 101-1532) (the "Bankruptcy Code"). Instead, the Bankruptcy Code permits municipalities to file a petition under Chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code, but only if certain requirements are met. These requirements include that the municipality must be "specifically authorized" under State law to file for relief under Chapter 9. For these purposes, "State law" may include, without limitation, statutes of general applicability enacted by the State legislature, special legislation applicable to a particular municipality, and/or executive orders issued by an appropriate officer of the State's executive branch. 28 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 55 As of the date hereof, Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.831, as amended, authorizes municipalities to file for bankruptcy relief under Chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code. A municipality is defined in United States Code, title 11, section 101, as amended through December 31, 1996, but limited to a county, statutory or home rule charter city, or town; or a housing and redevelopment authority, economic development authority, or rural development financing authority established under Chapter 469, a home rule charter or special law. FUNDS ON HAND (as of December 31, 2025) Fund Total Cash and Investments General $33,457,705 Special Revenue 18,246,296 Debt Service 9,288,526 EDA/Redevelopment District 24,065,036 Capital Projects 4,487,422 Enterprise Funds 19,907,759 Internal Service 5,987,569 Total Funds on Hand $115,440,313 29 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 56 ENTERPRISE FUNDS Revenues available for debt service on the City's enterprise funds have been as follows as of December 31 each year: 2023 Audited 2024 Audited 2025 Audited Water Total Operating Revenues $9,045,322 $8,709,379 $9,581,479 Less: Operating Expenses (6,354,959)(5,570,879) (5,946,837) Operating Income $2,690,363 $3,138,500 $3,634,642 Plus: Depreciation 1,010,059 1,121,101 1,183,402 Revenues Available for Debt Service $3,700,422 $4,259,601 $4,818,044 Sewer Total Operating Revenues $8,957,027 $9,308,774 $10,316,945 Less: Operating Expenses (6,277,740)(7,602,169) (7,529,390) Operating Income $2,679,287 $1,706,605 $2,787,555 Plus: Depreciation 211,130 242,460 253,593 Revenues Available for Debt Service $2,890,417 $1,949,065 $3,041,148 Storm Water Total Operating Revenues $3,710,665 $3,817,281 $4,121,198 Less: Operating Expenses (1,995,619)(2,290,598) (2,369,113) Operating Income $1,715,046 $1,526,683 $1,752,085 Plus: Depreciation 760,737 823,519 855,165 Revenues Available for Debt Service $2,475,783 $2,350,202 $2,607,250 Solid Waste1 Total Operating Revenues $4,420,169 $6,205,281 $6,799,987 Less: Operating Expenses (4,440,629)(6,537,988) (6,914,329) Operating Income ($20,460)($332,707)($114,342) Plus: Depreciation 0 0 0 Revenues Available for Debt Service ($20,460)($332,707)($114,342) 1 Beginning in Fiscal Year 2019, the Solid Waste fund was reclassified as a non-major enterprise fund. 30 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 57 SUMMARY GENERAL FUND INFORMATION COMBINED STATEMENT 2021 Audited 2022 Audited 2023 Audited 2024 Audited 2025 Audited Revenues Property taxes $29,469,243 $31,150,197 $32,037,360 $33,978,736 $38,476,376 Abatement of property taxes (44,200)0000 Licenses and permits 4,997,981 7,282,483 5,164,020 4,662,869 5,960,760 Intergovernmental 1,773,951 1,934,379 4,811,448 4,885,116 4,810,091 Charges for services 3,729,289 4,524,857 4,308,479 3,154,002 3,330,269 Fine and forfeits 150,964 175,090 179,508 14,261 24,561 Interest income (loss) (314,346) (234,741) 725,857 999,944 1,276,248 Miscellaneous 645,531 1,228,904 700,963 758,788 1,137,130 Total Revenues $40,408,413 $46,061,169 $47,927,635 $48,453,716 $55,015,435 Expenditures General government $9,458,536 $9,365,669 $10,427,128 $11,230,640 $13,169,820 Public safety 18,907,816 20,245,105 21,642,315 23,270,033 24,408,209 Operations 5,112,302 5,906,754 6,043,095 5,486,786 5,884,942 Non-department internal charges 0 0 0 1,021,337 1,021,337 Parks and recreation 6,636,383 7,982,218 8,656,422 9,196,252 8,933,616 Miscellaneous 482,494 585,774 831,287 618,487 820,775 Capital outlay 0 48,679 55,604 949,453 1,825,139 Total Expenditures $40,597,531 $44,134,199 $47,655,851 $51,772,988 $56,063,838 Excess of revenues over (under) expenditures ($189,118) $1,926,970 $271,784 ($3,319,272) ($1,048,403) Other Financing Sources (Uses) Proceeds from sale of capital assets $4,401 $0 $0 $0 $0 Transfers in 2,054,819 2,207,338 2,865,766 6,509,854 6,188,023 Transfers (out) (4,878,845) (2,288,000) (800,000) (2,562,114) (3,900,209) Total Other Financing Sources (Uses)($2,819,625) ($80,662) $2,065,766 $3,947,740 $2,287,814 ($3,008,743) $1,846,308 $2,337,550 $628,468 $1,239,411 General Fund Balance January 1 $26,824,099 $23,815,356 $25,661,664 $27,999,214 $28,627,682 Prior Period Adjustment 00000 General Fund Balance December 31 $23,815,356 $25,661,664 $27,999,214 $28,627,682 $29,867,093 DETAILS OF DECEMBER 31 FUND BALANCE Nonspendable $517,589 $324,139 $445,964 $650,292 319,229 Restricted 94,311 87,357 2,409,288 1,525,482 156,689 Assigned 1,275,140 1,304,322 700,000 1,714,823 896,547 Unassigned 21,928,316 23,945,846 24,443,962 24,737,085 28,494,628 Total $23,815,356 $25,661,664 $27,999,214 $28,627,682 $29,867,093 Net changes in Fund Balances FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31 The following are summaries of the revenues, expenditures and fund balances for the City's General Fund. These summaries are not purported to be the complete audited financial statements of the City, and potential purchasers should read the included financial statements in their entirety for more complete information concerning the City. Copies of the complete statements are available upon request. Appendix A includes the 2025 audited financial statements. 31 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 58 GENERAL FUND BUDGET SUMMARY COMBINED STATEMENT 2026 Adopted Budget1 Revenues Property taxes $46,962,146 Licenses and permits 4,783,658 Intergovernmental 3,871,954 Charges for services 3,542,943 Fine and forfeits 300 Interest income 500,000 Miscellaneous 623,155 Total Revenues $60,284,156 Expenditures General government $13,203,450 Public safety 25,489,352 Operations 6,172,385 Non-department internal charges 7,526,219 Parks and recreation 9,302,549 Miscellaneous 1,472,441 Total Expenditures $63,166,396 Excess of revenues over (under) expenditures ($2,882,240) Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers in $2,737,240 Transfers (out)(155,000) Total Other Financing Sources (Uses)$2,582,240 ($300,000) General Fund Balance January 1 $28,030,625 Prior Period Adjustment 0 General Fund Balance December 31 $27,730,625 1 The 2026 budget was adopted on December 15, 2025. Net changes in Fund Balances FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31 32 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 59 GENERAL INFORMATION LOCATION The City, with a 2020 U.S. Census population of 50,010 and a 2025 population estimate of 50,351, and comprising an area of 10.7 square miles, is located immediately west of Minneapolis, Minnesota. LARGER EMPLOYERS1 Larger employers in the City include the following: Firm Type of Business/Product Estimated No. of Employees Park Nicollet/Health Partners-Methodist Hospital Hospital and clinics 4,650 Wells Fargo Mortgage Financial services 1,100 I.S.D. No. 283 (St. Louis Park Public Schools) Elementary and secondary education 731 2 Japs-Olson Company Commercial printing and direct mail services 600 Target Retail and grocery store 405 The City Municipal government and services 403 Costco Wholesale Wholesale-general merchandise-retail 340 Sholom Home West Nursing home 301 Cub Foods Grocery 300 Life-Time Health Club 300 Source:Data Axle Reference Solutions, written and telephone survey, and the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development. 1 This does not purport to be a comprehensive list and is based on available data obtained through a survey of individual employers, as well as the sources identified above. 2 Reflects employees of entire district, including those outside City limits. 33 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 60 BUILDING PERMITS (as of May 31, 2026) 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 New Single Family Homes No. of building permits 7 5 1 8 3 Valuation $3,843,500 $3,285,000 $452,886 $4,995,000 $1,834,072 New Multiple Family Buildings No. of building permits 1 1 0 2 2 Valuation $54,505,485 $0 $0 $70,800,000 $78,826,525 New Commercial/Industrial No. of building permits 7 7 0 3 0 Valuation $168,146,801 $24,482,837 $0 $27,295,491 $0 All Building Permits (including additions and remodelings) No. of building permits 2,937 2,384 3,061 2,215 727 Valuation $418,121,984 $209,415,153 $113,690,987 $107,597,309 $105,750,088 Source:The City. U.S. CENSUS DATA Population Trend: The City 2010 U.S. Census population 45,250 2020 U.S. Census population 50,010 Percent of Change 2010 - 2020 10.52% 2025 Metropolitan Council Preliminary Population Estimate 50,351 34 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 61 Income and Age Statistics The City Hennepin County State of Minnesota United States 2024 per capita income $64,370 $59,401 $48,237 $44,673 2024 median household income $101,648 $97,653 $89,062 $80,734 2024 median family income $154,163 $134,878 $113,993 $99,999 2024 median gross rent $1,644 $1,487 $1,280 $1,413 2024 median value owner occupied units $386,800 $392,900 $329,300 $332,700 2024 median age 36.1 yrs. 37.6 yrs. 38.8 yrs. 38.9 yrs. State of Minnesota United States City % of 2024 per capita income 133.45%144.09% City % of 2024 median family income 135.24%154.16% Housing Statistics The City 2020 2025 Percent of Change All Housing Units 23,830 25,403 6.60% Source:2010 and 2020 Census of Population and Housing, and 2024 American Community Survey (Based on a five-year estimate), U.S. Census Bureau (https://data.census.gov), and 2025 Preliminary Population Estimates, Metropolitan Council (https://metrocouncil.org/). EMPLOYMENT/UNEMPLOYMENT DATA Rates are not compiled for individual communities within counties. Average Employment Average Unemployment Year Hennepin County Hennepin County State of Minnesota 2022 692,966 2.2%2.5% 2023 696,639 2.5%2.8% 2024 696,890 2.9%3.1% 2025 699,971 3.6%3.9% 2026, May 690,492 4.0%4.0% Source: Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development. 35 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 62 APPENDIX A FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Potential purchasers should read the included financial statements in their entirety for more complete information concerning the City's financial position. Such financial statements have been audited by the Auditor, to the extent and for the periods indicated thereon. The City has not requested or engaged the Auditor to perform, and the Auditor has not performed, any additional examination, assessments, procedures or evaluation with respect to such financial statements since the date thereof or with respect to this Preliminary Official Statement, nor has the City requested that the Auditor consent to the use of such financial statements in this Preliminary Official Statement. Although the inclusion of the financial statements in this Preliminary Official Statement is not intended to demonstrate the fiscal condition of the City since the date of the financial statements, in connection with the issuance of the Bonds, the City represents that there have been no material adverse change in the financial position or results of operations of the City, nor has the City incurred any material liabilities, which would make such financial statements misleading. Copies of the complete audited financial statements for the past three years and the current budget are available upon request from Ehlers. A-1 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 63 APPENDIX B FORM OF LEGAL OPINION (See following pages) B-1 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 64 4901-5554-2455.1 Kutak Rock LLP 60 South Sixth Street, Suite 3400, Minneapolis, MN 55402-4018 office 612.334.5000 $__________ City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota General Obligation Bonds Series 2026A We have acted as bond counsel to the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota (the “Issuer”) in connection with the issuance by the Issuer of its General Obligation Bonds, Series 2026A (the “Bonds”), originally dated July 28, 2026, and issued in the original aggregate principal amount of $__________. In such capacity and for the purpose of rendering this opinion we have examined certified copies of certain proceedings, certifications and other documents, and applicable laws as we have deemed necessary. Regarding questions of fact material to this opinion, we have relied on certified proceedings and other certifications of public officials and other documents furnished to us without undertaking to verify the same by independent investigation. Under existing laws, regulations, rulings and decisions in effect on the date hereof, and based on the foregoing we are of the opinion that: 1.The Bonds have been duly authorized and executed, and are valid and binding general obligations of the Issuer, enforceable in accordance with their terms. 2.The principal of and interest on the Bonds are payable in part from net revenues of the water system of the Issuer and in part from ad valorem taxes, but if necessary for the payment thereof additional ad valorem taxes are required by law to be levied on all taxable property of the Issuer, which taxes are not subject to any limitation as to rate or amount. 3.Interest on the Bonds is excludable from gross income for federal income tax purposes and is not an item of tax preference for purposes of the federal alternative minimum tax imposed on individuals. Further, and to the extent of the aforementioned federal income tax exclusion, interest on the Bonds is excludable from taxable net income of individuals, trusts, and estates for Minnesota income tax purposes, and is not a preference item for purposes of the computation of the Minnesota alternative minimum tax imposed on individuals, trusts, and estates. The opinions set forth in the preceding sentences are subject to the condition that the Issuer comply with all requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 that must be satisfied subsequent to the issuance of the Bonds in order that the interest thereon be, and continue to be, excludable from gross income for federal income tax purposes and from taxable net income for Minnesota income tax purposes. The Issuer has covenanted to comply with all such requirements. Failure to comply with certain of such requirements may cause interest on the Bonds to be included in gross income for federal income tax purposes and in taxable net income for Minnesota income tax purposes, retroactively to the date of issuance of the Bonds. Interest on the Bonds may affect the federal alternative minimum tax imposed on certain corporations and such interest is subject to Minnesota franchise taxes on certain corporations (including financial institutions) measured by income. We express no opinion regarding tax consequences arising with respect to the Bonds other than as expressly set forth herein. 4.The rights of the owners of the Bonds and the enforceability of the Bonds may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium, and other similar laws affecting creditors’ rights generally and by equitable principles, whether considered at law or in equity. B-2 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 65 4901-5554-2455.1 We have not been asked and have not undertaken to review the accuracy, completeness or sufficiency of the Official Statement or other offering material relating to the Bonds, and accordingly we express no opinion with respect thereto. This opinion is given as of the date hereof and we assume no obligation to update, revise, or supplement this opinion to reflect any facts or circumstances that may hereafter come to our attention or any changes in law that may hereafter occur. Dated July ___, 2026 at Minneapolis, Minnesota. B-3 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 66 APPENDIX C BOOK-ENTRY-ONLY SYSTEM 1. The Depository Trust Company ("DTC"), New York, New York, will act as securities depository for the securities (the "Securities"). The Securities will be issued as fully-registered securities registered in the name of Cede & Co. (DTC's partnership nominee) or such other name as may be requested by an authorized representative of DTC. One fully-registered Security certificate will be issued for [each issue of] the Securities, [each] in the aggregate principal amount of such issue, and will be deposited with DTC. [If, however, the aggregate principal amount of [any] issue exceeds $500 million, one certificate will be issued with respect to each $500 million of principal amount, and an additional certificate will be issued with respect to any remaining principal amount of such issue.] 2. DTC, the world's largest securities depository, is a limited-purpose trust company organized under the New York Banking Law, a "banking organization" within the meaning of the New York Banking Law, a member of the Federal Reserve System, a "clearing corporation" within the meaning of the New York Uniform Commercial Code, and a "clearing agency" registered pursuant to the provisions of Section 17A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. DTC holds and provides asset servicing for over 3.5 million issues of U.S. and non-U.S. equity issues, corporate and municipal debt issues, and money market instruments (from over 100 countries) that DTC's participants ("Direct Participants") deposit with DTC. DTC also facilitates the post-trade settlement among Direct Participants of sales and other securities transactions in deposited securities, through electronic computerized book-entry transfers and pledges between Direct Participants' accounts. This eliminates the need for physical movement of securities certificates. Direct Participants include both U.S. and non-U.S. securities brokers and dealers, banks, trust companies, clearing corporations, and certain other organizations. DTC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation ("DTCC"). DTCC is the holding company for DTC, National Securities Clearing Corporation and Fixed Income Clearing Corporation, all of which are registered clearing agencies. DTCC is owned by the users of its regulated subsidiaries. Access to the DTC system is also available to others such as both U.S. and non-U.S. securities brokers and dealers, banks, trust companies, and clearing corporations that clear through or maintain a custodial relationship with a Direct Participant, either directly or indirectly ("Indirect Participants"). DTC has a Standard & Poor's rating of AA+. The DTC Rules applicable to its Participants are on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission. More information about DTC can be found at www.dtcc.com. 3. Purchases of Securities under the DTC system must be made by or through Direct Participants, which will receive a credit for the Securities on DTC's records. The ownership interest of each actual purchaser of each Security ("Beneficial Owner") is in turn to be recorded on the Direct and Indirect Participants' records. Beneficial Owners will not receive written confirmation from DTC of their purchase. Beneficial Owners are, however, expected to receive written confirmations providing details of the transaction, as well as periodic statements of their holdings, from the Direct or Indirect Participant through which the Beneficial Owner entered into the transaction. Transfers of ownership interests in the Securities are to be accomplished by entries made on the books of Direct and Indirect Participants acting on behalf of Beneficial Owners. Beneficial Owners will not receive certificates representing their ownership interests in Securities, except in the event that use of the book-entry system for the Securities is discontinued. 4. To facilitate subsequent transfers, all Securities deposited by Direct Participants with DTC are registered in the name of DTC's partnership nominee, Cede & Co., or such other name as may be requested by an authorized representative of DTC. The deposit of Securities with DTC and their registration in the name of Cede & Co. or such other DTC nominee do not effect any change in beneficial ownership. DTC has no knowledge of the actual Beneficial Owners of the Securities; DTC's records reflect only the identity of the Direct Participants to whose accounts such Securities are credited, which may or may not be the Beneficial Owners. The Direct and Indirect Participants will remain responsible for keeping account of their holdings on behalf of their customers. C-1 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 67 5. Conveyance of notices and other communications by DTC to Direct Participants, by Direct Participants to Indirect Participants, and by Direct Participants and Indirect Participants to Beneficial Owners will be governed by arrangements among them, subject to any statutory or regulatory requirements as may be in effect from time to time. [Beneficial Owners of Securities may wish to take certain steps to augment the transmission to them of notices of significant events with respect to the Securities, such as redemptions, tenders, defaults, and proposed amendments to the Security documents. For example, Beneficial Owners of Securities may wish to ascertain that the nominee holding the Securities for their benefit has agreed to obtain and transmit notices to Beneficial Owners. In the alternative, Beneficial Owners may wish to provide their names and addresses to the registrar and request that copies of notices be provided directly to them.] 6. Redemption notices shall be sent to DTC. If less than all of the Securities within an issue are being redeemed, DTC's practice is to determine by lot the amount of the interest of each Direct Participant in such issue to be redeemed. 7. Neither DTC nor Cede & Co. (nor any other DTC nominee) will consent or vote with respect to Securities unless authorized by a Direct Participant in accordance with DTC's MMI Procedures. Under its usual procedures, DTC mails an Omnibus Proxy to City as soon as possible after the record date. The Omnibus Proxy assigns Cede & Co.'s consenting or voting rights to those Direct Participants to whose accounts Securities are credited on the record date (identified in a listing attached to the Omnibus Proxy). 8. Redemption proceeds, distributions, and dividend payments on the Securities will be made to Cede & Co., or such other nominee as may be requested by an authorized representative of DTC. DTC's practice is to credit Direct Participants' accounts upon DTC's receipt of funds and corresponding detail information from the City or Agent, on payable date in accordance with their respective holdings shown on DTC's records. Payments by Participants to Beneficial Owners will be governed by standing instructions and customary practices, as is the case with securities held for the accounts of customers in bearer form or registered in "street name," and will be the responsibility of such Participant and not of DTC, Agent, or the City, subject to any statutory or regulatory requirements as may be in effect from time to time. Payment of redemption proceeds, distributions, and dividend payments to Cede & Co. (or such other nominee as may be requested by an authorized representative of DTC) is the responsibility of the City or Agent, disbursement of such payments to Direct Participants will be the responsibility of DTC, and disbursement of such payments to the Beneficial Owners will be the responsibility of Direct and Indirect Participants. 9. A Beneficial Owner shall give notice to elect to have its Securities purchased or tendered, through its Participant, to [Tender/Remarketing] Agent, and shall effect delivery of such Securities by causing the Direct Participant to transfer the Participant's interest in the Securities, on DTC's records, to [Tender/Remarketing] Agent. The requirement for physical delivery of Securities in connection with an optional tender or a mandatory purchase will be deemed satisfied when the ownership rights in the Securities are transferred by Direct Participants on DTC's records and followed by a book-entry credit of tendered Securities to [Tender/Remarketing] Agent's DTC account. 10. DTC may discontinue providing its services as depository with respect to the Securities at any time by giving reasonable notice to the City or Agent. Under such circumstances, in the event that a successor depository is not obtained, Security certificates are required to be printed and delivered. 11. The City may decide to discontinue use of the system of book-entry-only transfers through DTC (or a successor securities depository). In that event, Security certificates will be printed and delivered to DTC. 12. The information in this section concerning DTC and DTC's book-entry system has been obtained from sources that the City believes to be reliable, but the City takes no responsibility for the accuracy thereof. C-2 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 68 APPENDIX D FORM OF CONTINUING DISCLOSURE CERTIFICATE (See following pages) D-1 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 69 4926-7205-9319.1 $__________ City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota General Obligation Bonds Series 2026A CONTINUING DISCLOSURE CERTIFICATE July ___, 2026 This Continuing Disclosure Certificate (the “Disclosure Certificate”) is executed and delivered by the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota (the “Issuer”) in connection with the issuance of its General Obligation Bonds, Series 2026A (the “Bonds”), in the original aggregate principal amount of $___________. The Bonds are being issued pursuant to resolutions adopted by the City Council of the Issuer (the “Resolutions”). The Bonds are being delivered to _____________________________ (the “Purchaser”) on the date hereof. Pursuant to the Resolutions, the Issuer has covenanted and agreed to provide continuing disclosure of certain financial information and operating data and timely notices of the occurrence of certain events. The Issuer hereby covenants and agrees as follows: Section 1. Purpose of the Disclosure Certificate. This Disclosure Certificate is being executed and delivered by the Issuer for the benefit of the Holders (as defined herein) of the Bonds in order to provide for the public availability of such information and assist the Participating Underwriter(s) (as defined herein) in complying with the Rule (as defined herein). This Disclosure Certificate, together with the Resolutions, constitutes the written agreement or contract for the benefit of the Holders of the Bonds that is required by the Rule. Section 2. Definitions. In addition to the defined terms set forth in the Resolutions, which apply to any capitalized term used in this Disclosure Certificate unless otherwise defined in this Section, the following capitalized terms shall have the following meanings: “Annual Report” means any annual report provided by the Issuer pursuant to, and as described in, Sections 3 and 4 of this Disclosure Certificate. “Audited Financial Statements” means annual financial statements of the Issuer, prepared in accordance with GAAP as prescribed by GASB. “Bonds” means the General Obligation Bonds, Series 2026A, issued by the Issuer in the original aggregate principal amount of $____________. “Disclosure Certificate” means this Continuing Disclosure Certificate. “EMMA” means the Electronic Municipal Market Access system operated by the MSRB and designated as a nationally recognized municipal securities information repository and the exclusive portal for complying with the continuing disclosure requirements of the Rule. “Final Official Statement” means the deemed Final Official Statement, dated July ___, 2026, which constitutes the final official statement delivered in connection with the Bonds, which is available from the MSRB. “Financial Obligation” means a (a) debt obligation; (b) derivative instrument entered into in connection with, or pledged as security or a source of payment for, an existing or planned debt obligation; D-2 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 70 4926-7205-9319.1 or (c) guarantee of a Financial Obligation as described in clause (a) or (b). The term “Financial Obligation” shall not include municipal securities as to which a final official statement has been provided to the MSRB consistent with the Rule. “Fiscal Year” means the fiscal year of the Issuer. “GAAP” means generally accepted accounting principles for governmental units as prescribed by GASB. “GASB” means the Governmental Accounting Standards Board. “Holder” means the person in whose name a Bond is registered or a beneficial owner of such a Bond. “Issuer” means the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, which is the obligated person with respect to the Bonds. “Material Event” means any of the events listed in Section 5(a) of this Disclosure Certificate. “MSRB” means the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board located at 1300 I Street NW, Suite 1000, Washington, DC 20005. “Participating Underwriter” means any of the original underwriter(s) of the Bonds (including the Purchaser) required to comply with the Rule in connection with the offering of the Bonds. “Purchaser” means _______________. “Repository” means EMMA, or any successor thereto designated by the SEC. “Rule” means SEC Rule 15c2-12(b)(5) promulgated by the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as the same may be amended from time to time, and including written interpretations thereof by the SEC. “SEC” means Securities and Exchange Commission, and any successor thereto. Section 3. Provision of Annual Financial Information and Audited Financial Statements. (a)The Issuer shall provide to the Repository not later than twelve (12) months after the end of the Fiscal Year commencing with the year that ends December 31, 2026, an Annual Report which is consistent with the requirements of Section 4 of this Disclosure Certificate. The Annual Report may be submitted as a single document or as separate documents comprising a package, and may cross-reference other information as provided in Section 4 of this Disclosure Certificate; provided that the Audited Financial Statements of the Issuer may be submitted separately from the balance of the Annual Report. (b)If the Issuer is unable or fails to provide to the Repository an Annual Report by the date required in subsection (a), the Issuer shall send a notice of that fact to the Repository and the MSRB. (c)The Issuer shall determine each year prior to the date for providing the Annual Report the name and address of each Repository. Section 4. Content of Annual Reports. The Issuer’s Annual Report shall contain or incorporate by reference the following sections of the Final Official Statement: D-3 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 71 4926-7205-9319.1 1.Current Property Valuations 2.Direct Debt 3.Tax Levies and Collections 4.U.S. Census Data/Population Trend 5. Employment/Unemployment Data In addition to the items listed above, the Annual Report shall include Audited Financial Statements submitted in accordance with Section 3 of this Disclosure Certificate. Any or all of the items listed above may be incorporated by reference from other documents, including official statements of debt issues of the Issuer or related public entities, which have been submitted to the Repository or the SEC. If the document incorporated by reference is a final official statement, it must also be available from the MSRB. The Issuer shall clearly identify each such other document so incorporated by reference. Section 5. Reporting of Material Events. (a)This Section 5 shall govern the giving of notice of the occurrence of any of the following events (“Material Events”) with respect to the Bonds: 1.Principal and interest payment delinquencies; 2.Non-payment related defaults, if material; 3.Unscheduled draws on debt service reserves reflecting financial difficulties; 4.Unscheduled draws on credit enhancements reflecting financial difficulties; 5.Substitution of credit or liquidity providers, or their failure to perform; 6.Adverse tax opinions, the issuance by the Internal Revenue Service of proposed or final determinations of taxability, Notices of Proposed Issue (IRS Form 5701–TEB), or other material notices or determinations with respect to the tax status of the security, or other material events affecting the tax status of the security; 7.Modifications to rights of security holders, if material; 8.Bond calls, if material, and tender offers; 9.Defeasances; 10.Release, substitution, or sale of property securing repayment of the securities, if material; 11.Rating changes; 12.Bankruptcy, insolvency, receivership or similar event of the obligated person; 13.The consummation of a merger, consolidation, or acquisition involving an obligated person or the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the obligated person, other than in the ordinary course of business, the entry into a definitive agreement to undertake D-4 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 72 4926-7205-9319.1 such an action or the termination of a definitive agreement relating to any such actions, other than pursuant to its terms, if material; 14.Appointment of a successor or additional trustee or the change of name of a trustee, if material; 15.Incurrence of a Financial Obligation of the obligated person, if material, or agreement to covenants, events of default, remedies, priority rights, or other similar terms of a Financial Obligation of the obligated person, any of which affect security holders, if material; and 16.Default, event of acceleration, termination event, modification of terms, or other similar events under the terms of a Financial Obligation of the obligated person, any of which reflect financial difficulties. (b)The Issuer shall file a notice of such occurrence with the Repository or with the MSRB within ten (10) business days of the occurrence of the Material Event. (c)Unless otherwise required by law and subject to technical and economic feasibility, the Issuer shall employ such methods of information transmission as shall be requested or recommended by the designated recipients of the Issuer’s information. Section 6. EMMA. The SEC has designated EMMA as a nationally recognized municipal securities information repository and the exclusive portal for complying with the continuing disclosure requirements of the Rule. Until the EMMA system is amended or altered by the MSRB and the SEC, the Issuer shall make all filings required under this Disclosure Certificate solely with EMMA. Section 7. Termination of Reporting Obligation. The Issuer’s obligations under the Resolutions and this Disclosure Certificate shall terminate upon the redemption in full of all Bonds or payment in full of all Bonds. Section 8. Agent. The Issuer may, from time to time, appoint or engage a dissemination agent to assist it in carrying out its obligations under the Resolutions and this Disclosure Certificate, and may discharge any such agent, with or without appointing a successor dissemination agent. Section 9. Amendment; Waiver. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Resolutions or this Disclosure Certificate, the Issuer may amend this Disclosure Certificate, and any provision of this Disclosure Certificate may be waived, if such amendment or waiver is supported by an opinion of nationally recognized bond counsel to the effect that such amendment or waiver would not, in and of itself, cause a violation of the Rule. The provisions of the Resolutions requiring continuing disclosure pursuant to the Rule and this Disclosure Certificate, or any provision hereof, shall be null and void in the event that the Issuer delivers to the Repository an opinion of nationally recognized bond counsel to the effect that those portions of the Rule which impose the continuing disclosure requirements of the Resolutions and the execution and delivery of this Disclosure Certificate are invalid, have been repealed retroactively or otherwise do not apply to the Bonds. The provisions of the Resolutions requiring continuing disclosure pursuant to the Rule and this Disclosure Certificate may be amended without the consent of the Holders of the Bonds, but only upon the delivery by the Issuer to the Repository of the proposed amendment and an opinion of nationally recognized bond counsel to the effect that such amendment, and giving effect thereto, will not adversely affect the compliance with the Rule. D-5 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 73 4926-7205-9319.1 Section 10. Additional Information. Nothing in this Disclosure Certificate shall be deemed to prevent the Issuer from disseminating any other information, using the means of dissemination set forth in this Disclosure Certificate or any other means of communication, or including any other information in any Annual Report or notice of occurrence of a Material Event, in addition to that which is required by this Disclosure Certificate. If the Issuer chooses to include any information in any Annual Report or notice of occurrence of a Material Event in addition to that which is specifically required by this Disclosure Certificate, the Issuer shall have no obligation under this Disclosure Certificate to update such information or include it in any future Annual Report or notice of occurrence of a Material Event. Section 11. Default. In the event of a failure of the Issuer to comply with any provision of this Disclosure Certificate any Holder of the Bonds may take such actions as may be necessary and appropriate, including seeking mandamus or specific performance by court order, to cause the Issuer to comply with its obligations under the Resolutions and this Disclosure Certificate. A default under this Disclosure Certificate shall not be deemed an event of default with respect to the Bonds and the sole remedy under this Disclosure Certificate in the event of any failure of the Issuer to comply with this Disclosure Certificate shall be an action to compel performance. Section 12. Beneficiaries. This Disclosure Certificate shall inure solely to the benefit of the Issuer, the Participating Underwriters, and the Holders from time to time of the Bonds, and shall create no rights in any other person or entity. (The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.) D-6 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 74 4926-7205-9319.1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have executed this Disclosure Certificate in our official capacities effective as of the date and year first written above. CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA Mayor City Manager D-7 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 75 APPENDIX E TERMS OF PROPOSAL $9,930,000* GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2026A CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA Proposals for the purchase of $9,930,000* General Obligation Bonds, Series 2026A (the "Bonds") of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota (the "City") will be received at the offices of Ehlers and Associates, Inc. ("Ehlers"), 3001 Broadway Street, Suite 320, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55413, municipal advisors to the City, until 10:30 A.M., Central Time, and ELECTRONIC PROPOSALS will be received via PARITY, in the manner described below, until 10:30 A.M., Central Time, on July 6, 2026, at which time they will be opened, read and tabulated. The proposals will be presented to the City Council for consideration for award by resolution at a meeting to be held at 6:15 P.M., Central Time, on the same date. The proposal offering to purchase the Bonds upon the terms specified herein and most favorable to the City will be accepted unless all proposals are rejected. AUTHORITY; PURPOSE; SECURITY The Bonds are being issued pursuant to Section 6.15 of the City Charter of the City, and Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 444 and 475, as amended, by the City, for the purposes of financing capital projects in the City and water utility improvements, including Phase II of the Cedar Lake and Louisiana road and utility reconstruction, the 2026 pavement management projects and Connect the Park projects and improvements to the Police Department Facility. The Bonds will be general obligations of the City for which its full faith and credit and taxing powers are pledged. DATES AND MATURITIES The Bonds will be dated July 28, 2026, will be issued as fully registered Bonds in the denomination of $5,000 each, or any integral multiple thereof, and will mature on February 1 as follows: Year Amount* Year Amount* Year Amount* 2028 $460,000 2033 $745,000 2038 $510,000 2029 650,000 2034 765,000 2039 535,000 2030 675,000 2035 795,000 2040 550,000 2031 695,000 2036 820,000 2041 575,000 2032 715,000 2037 845,000 2042 595,000 ADJUSTMENT OPTION The City reserves the right to increase or decrease the principal amount of the Bonds on the day of sale, in increments of $5,000 each. Increases or decreases may be made in any maturity. If any principal amounts are adjusted, the purchase price proposed will be adjusted to maintain the same gross spread per $1,000. TERM BOND OPTION Proposals for the Bonds may contain a maturity schedule providing for any combination of serial bonds and term bonds, subject to mandatory redemption, so long as the amount of principal maturing or subject to mandatory redemption in each year conforms to the maturity schedule set forth above. All dates are inclusive. E-1 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 76 INTEREST PAYMENT DATES AND RATES Interest will be payable on February 1 and August 1 of each year, commencing August 1, 2027, to the registered owners of the Bonds appearing of record in the bond register as of the close of business on the 15th day (whether or not a business day) of the immediately preceding month. Interest will be computed upon the basis of a 360-day year of twelve 30-day months and will be rounded pursuant to rules of the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. The rate for any maturity may not be more than 2.00% less than the rate for any preceding maturity. (For example, if a rate of 4.50% is proposed for the 2028 maturity, then the lowest rate that may be proposed for any later maturity is 2.50%.) All Bonds of the same maturity must bear interest from date of issue until paid at a single, uniform rate. Each rate must be expressed in an integral multiple of 5/100 or 1/8 of 1%. BOOK-ENTRY-ONLY FORMAT Unless otherwise specified by the purchaser, the Bonds will be designated in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee for The Depository Trust Company, New York, New York ("DTC"). DTC will act as securities depository for the Bonds, and will be responsible for maintaining a book-entry system for recording the interests of its participants and the transfers of interests between its participants. The participants will be responsible for maintaining records regarding the beneficial interests of the individual purchasers of the Bonds. So long as Cede & Co. is the registered owner of the Bonds, all payments of principal and interest will be made to the depository which, in turn, will be obligated to remit such payments to its participants for subsequent disbursement to the beneficial owners of the Bonds. PAYING AGENT The City has selected Bond Trust Services Corporation, Minneapolis, Minnesota ("BTSC"), to act as paying agent (the "Paying Agent"). BTSC and Ehlers are affiliate companies. The City will pay the charges for Paying Agent services. The City reserves the right to remove the Paying Agent and to appoint a successor. OPTIONAL REDEMPTION At the option of the City, the Bonds maturing on or after February 1, 2036 shall be subject to optional redemption prior to maturity on February 1, 2035 or any date thereafter, at a price of par plus accrued interest to the date of optional redemption. Redemption may be in whole or in part of the Bonds subject to prepayment. If redemption is in part, the selection of the amounts and maturities of the Bonds to be redeemed shall be at the discretion of the City. If only part of the Bonds having a common maturity date are called for redemption, then the City or Paying Agent, if any, will notify DTC of the particular amount of such maturity to be redeemed. DTC will determine by lot the amount of each participant's interest in such maturity to be redeemed and each participant will then select by lot the beneficial ownership interest in such maturity to be redeemed. Notice of redemption shall be sent by mail not more than 60 days and not less than 30 days prior to the date fixed for redemption to the registered owner of each Bond to be redeemed at the address shown on the registration books. DELIVERY On or about July 28, 2026, the Bonds will be delivered without cost to the winning bidder at DTC. On the day of closing, the City will furnish to the winning bidder the opinion of bond counsel hereinafter described, an arbitrage certification, and certificates verifying that no litigation in any manner questioning the validity of the Bonds is then pending or, to the best knowledge of officers of the City, threatened. Payment for the Bonds must be received by the City at its designated depository on the date of closing in immediately available funds. E-2 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 77 LEGAL MATTERS An opinion as to the validity of the Bonds and the exemption from taxation of the interest thereon will be furnished by Kutak Rock LLP, Minneapolis, Minnesota, Bond Counsel to the City ("Bond Counsel"), and will be available at the time of delivery of the Bonds. The legal opinion will state that the Bonds are valid and binding general obligations of the City; provided that the rights of the owners of the Bonds and the enforceability of the Bonds may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium, and other similar laws affecting creditors' rights and by equitable principles (which may be applied in either a legal or equitable proceeding). See "FORM OF LEGAL OPINION" found in Appendix B. Bond Counsel has not participated in the preparation of this Official Statement and is not passing upon its accuracy, completeness, or sufficiency. Bond Counsel has not examined or verified, nor attempted to examine or verify, any of the financial or statistical statements or data contained in this Official Statement and will express no opinion with respect thereto. SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS Proposals must not be for less than $9,810,840 plus accrued interest on the principal sum of $9,930,000 from date of original issue of the Bonds to date of delivery. Prior to the time established above for the opening of proposals, interested parties may submit a proposal as follows: 1) Electronically to bondsale@ehlers-inc.com; or 2) Electronically via PARITY in accordance with this Terms of Proposal until 10:30 A.M., Central Time, but no proposal will be received after the time for receiving proposals specified above. To the extent any instructions or directions set forth in PARITY conflict with this Terms of Proposal, the terms of this Terms of Proposal shall control. For further information about PARITY, potential bidders may contact IHS Markit (now part of S&P Global) at https://ihsmarkit.com/products/municipal-issuance.html or via telephone (844) 301-7334. Proposals must be submitted to Ehlers via one of the methods described above and must be received prior to the time established above for the opening of proposals. Each proposal must be unconditional except as to legality. Neither the City nor Ehlers shall be responsible for any failure to receive a facsimile submission. A good faith deposit ("Deposit") in the amount of $198,600 shall be made by the winning bidder by wire transfer of funds. Such Deposit shall be received by Ehlers no later than two hours after the proposal opening time. Wire transfer instructions will be provided to the winning bidder by Ehlers after the tabulation of proposals. The City reserves the right to award the Bonds to a winning bidder whose wire transfer is initiated but not received by such time provided that such winning bidder's federal wire reference number has been received by such time. In the event the Deposit is not received as provided above, the City may award the Bonds to the bidder submitting the next best proposal provided such bidder agrees to such award. The Deposit will be retained by the City as liquidated damages if the proposal is accepted and the Purchaser fails to comply therewith. The City and the winning bidder who chooses to so wire the Deposit hereby agree irrevocably that Ehlers shall be the escrow holder of the Deposit wired to such account subject only to these conditions and duties: 1) All income earned thereon shall be retained by the escrow holder as payment for its expenses; 2) If the proposal is not accepted, Ehlers shall, at its expense, promptly return the Deposit amount to the winning bidder; 3) If the proposal is accepted, the Deposit shall be returned to the winning bidder at the closing; 4) Ehlers shall bear all costs of maintaining the escrow account and returning the funds to the winning bidder; 5) Ehlers shall not be an insurer of the Deposit amount and shall have no liability hereunder except if it willfully fails to perform or recklessly disregards, its duties specified herein; and 6) FDIC insurance on deposits within the escrow account shall be limited to $250,000 per bidder. E-3 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 78 No proposal can be withdrawn after the time set for receiving proposals unless the meeting of the City scheduled for award of the Bonds is adjourned, recessed, or continued to another date without award of the Bonds having been made. AWARD The Bonds will be awarded to the bidder offering the lowest interest rate to be determined on a True Interest Cost (TIC) basis. The City's computation of the interest rate of each proposal, in accordance with customary practice, will be controlling. In the event of a tie, the sale of the Bonds will be awarded by lot. The City reserves the right to reject any and all proposals and to waive any informality in any proposal. BOND INSURANCE If the Bonds are qualified for any bond insurance policy, the purchase of such policy shall be at the sole option and expense of the winning bidder. Any cost for such insurance policy is to be paid by the winning bidder, except that, if the City requested and received a rating on the Bonds from a rating agency, the City will pay that rating fee. Any rating agency fees not requested by the City are the responsibility of the winning bidder. Failure of the municipal bond insurer to issue the policy after the Bonds are awarded to the winning bidder shall not constitute cause for failure or refusal by the winning bidder to accept delivery of the Bonds. CUSIP NUMBERS The City will assume no obligation for the assignment or printing of CUSIP numbers on the Bonds or for the correctness of any numbers printed thereon, but will permit such numbers to be printed at the expense of the winning bidder, if the winning bidder waives any delay in delivery occasioned thereby. QUALIFIED TAX-EXEMPT OBLIGATIONS The City will designate the Bonds as "qualified tax-exempt obligations" for purposes of Section 265(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. CONTINUING DISCLOSURE In order to assist the Underwriter (Syndicate Manager) in complying with the provisions of Rule 15c2-12 promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 the City will enter into an undertaking for the benefit of the holders of the Bonds. A description of the details and terms of the undertaking is set forth in Appendix D of the Preliminary Official Statement. NEW ISSUE PRICING The winning bidder will be required to provide, in a timely manner, certain information necessary to compute the yield on the Bonds pursuant to the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and to provide a certificate which will be provided by Bond Counsel upon request. (a) The winning bidder shall assist the City in establishing the issue price of the Bonds and shall execute and deliver to the City at closing an "issue price" or similar certificate satisfactory to Bond Counsel setting forth the reasonably expected initial offering price to the public or the sales price or prices of the Bonds, together with the supporting pricing wires or equivalent communications. All actions to be taken by the City under this Terms of Proposal to establish the issue price of the Bonds may be taken on behalf of the City by the City's municipal advisor identified herein and any notice or report to be provided to the City may be provided to the City's municipal advisor. E-4 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 79 (b) The City intends that the provisions of Treasury Regulation Section 1.148-1(f)(3)(i) (defining "competitive sale" for purposes of establishing the issue price of the Bonds) will apply to the initial sale of the Bonds (the "competitive sale requirements") because: (1) The City shall disseminate this Terms of Proposal to potential underwriters in a manner that is reasonably designed to reach potential investors; (2) all bidders shall have an equal opportunity to bid; (3) the City may receive proposals from at least three underwriters of municipal bonds who have established industry reputations for underwriting new issuances of municipal bonds; and (4) the City anticipates awarding the sale of the Bonds to the bidder who submits a firm offer to purchase the Bonds at the highest price (or lowest interest cost), as set forth in this Terms of Proposal. Any proposal submitted pursuant to this Terms of Proposal shall be considered a firm offer for the purchase of the Bonds, as specified in this proposal. (c) If all of the requirements of a "competitive sale" are not satisfied, the City shall advise the winning bidder of such fact prior to the time of award of the sale of the Bonds to the winning bidder. In such event, any proposal submitted will not be subject to cancellation or withdrawal and the City agrees to use the rule selected by the winning bidder on its proposal form to determine the issue price for the Bonds. On its proposal form, each bidder must select one of the following two rules for determining the issue price of the Bonds: (1) the first price at which 10% of a maturity of the Bonds (the "10% test") is sold to the public as the issue price of that maturity or (2) the initial offering price to the public as of the sale date as the issue price of each maturity of the Bonds (the "hold-the-offering-price rule"). (d) If all of the requirements of a "competitive sale" are not satisfied and the winning bidder selects the hold-the- offering-price rule, the winning bidder shall (i) confirm that the underwriters have offered or will offer the Bonds to the public on or before the date of award at the offering price or prices (the "initial offering price"), or at the corresponding yield or yields, set forth in the proposal submitted by the winning bidder and (ii) agree, on behalf of the underwriters participating in the purchase of the Bonds, that the underwriters will neither offer nor sell unsold Bonds of any maturity to which the hold-the-offering-price rule shall apply to any person at a price that is higher than the initial offering price to the public during the period starting on the sale date and ending on the earlier of the following: (1) the close of the fifth (5th) business day after the sale date; or (2) the date on which the underwriters have sold at least 10% of that maturity of the Bonds to the public at a price that is no higher than the initial offering price to the public. The winning bidder will advise the City promptly after the close of the fifth (5th) business day after the sale whether it has sold 10% of that maturity of the Bonds to the public at a price that is no higher than the initial offering price to the public. The City acknowledges that in making the representation set forth above, the winning bidder will rely on: (i) the agreement of each underwriter to comply with requirements for establishing issue price of the Bonds, including, but not limited to, its agreement to comply with the hold-the-price rule, if applicable to the Bonds, as set forth in an agreement among underwriters and the related pricing wires, E-5 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 80 (ii)in the event a selling group has been created in connection with the initial sale of the Bonds to the public, the agreement of each dealer who is a member of the selling group to comply with the requirements for establishing issue price of the Bonds, including, but not limited to, its agreement to comply with the hold-the-offering-price rule, if applicable to the Bonds, as set forth in a selling group agreement and the related pricing wires, and (iii) in the event that an underwriter or dealer who is a member of the selling group is a party to a third-party distribution agreement that was employed in connection with the initial sale of the Bonds to the public, the agreement of each broker-dealer that is party to such agreement to comply with the requirements for establishing issue price of the Bonds, including, but not limited to, its agreement to comply with the hold-the-offering-price rule, if applicable to the Bonds, as set forth in the third-party distribution agreement and the related pricing wires. The City further acknowledges that each underwriter shall be solely liable for its failure to comply with its agreement regarding the requirements for establishing issue price rule of the Bonds, including, but not limited to, its agreement to comply with the hold-the-offering-price rule, if applicable to the Bonds, and that no underwriter shall be liable for the failure of any other underwriter, or of any dealer who is a member of a selling group, or of any broker-dealer that is a party to a third-party distribution agreement to comply with its corresponding agreement to comply with the requirements for establishing issue price of the Bonds, including, but not limited to, its agreement to comply with the hold-the-offering- price rule as applicable to the Bonds. (e) If all of the requirements of a "competitive sale" are not satisfied and the winning bidder selects the 10% test, the winning bidder agrees to promptly report to the City, Bond Counsel and Ehlers the prices at which the Bonds have been sold to the public. That reporting obligation shall continue, whether or not the closing date has occurred, until either (i) all Bonds of that maturity have been sold or (ii) the 10% test has been satisfied as to each maturity of the Bonds, provided that, the winning bidder's reporting obligation after the Closing Date may be at reasonable periodic intervals or otherwise upon request of the City or bond counsel. (f) By submitting a proposal, each bidder confirms that: (i) any agreement among underwriters, any selling group agreement and each third-party distribution agreement (to which the bidder is a party) relating to the initial sale of the Bonds to the public, together with the related pricing wires, contains or will contain language obligating each underwriter, each dealer who is a member of the selling group, and each broker-dealer that is party to such third-party distribution agreement, as applicable, to: (A) report the prices at which it sells to the public the unsold Bonds of each maturity allocated to it, whether or not the Closing Date has occurred until either all securities of that maturity allocated to it have been sold or it is notified by the winning bidder that either the 10% test has been satisfied as to the Bonds of that maturity, provided that, the reporting obligation after the Closing Date may be at reasonable periodic intervals or otherwise upon request of the City or bond counsel. (B) comply with the hold-the-offering-price rule, if applicable, in each case if and for so long as directed by the winning bidder and as set forth in the related pricing wires, and (ii) any agreement among underwriters or selling group agreement relating to the initial sale of the Bonds to the public, together with the related pricing wires, contains or will contain language obligating each underwriter, each dealer who is a member of the selling group and each broker dealer that is a party to a third-party distribution agreement to be employed in connection with the initial sale of the Bonds to the public to require each broker-dealer that is a party to such third-party distribution agreement to: (A) to promptly notify the winning bidder of any sales of Bonds that, to its knowledge, are made to a purchaser who is a related party to an underwriter participating in the initial sale of the Bonds to the public (each such term being used as defined below), and (B) to acknowledge that, unless otherwise advised by the underwriter, dealer or broker-dealer, the winning bidder shall assume that each order submitted by the underwriter, dealer or broker-dealer is a sale to the public. E-6 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 81 (g) Sales of any Bonds to any person that is a related party to an underwriter participating in the initial sale of the Bonds to the public (each term being used as defined below) shall not constitute sales to the public for purposes of this Terms of Proposal. Further, for purposes of this Terms of Proposal: (i) "public" means any person other than an underwriter or a related party, (ii) "underwriter" means (A) any person that agrees pursuant to a written contract with the City (or with the lead underwriter to form an underwriting syndicate) to participate in the initial sale of the Bonds to the public and (B) any person that agrees pursuant to a written contract directly or indirectly with a person described in clause (A) to participate in the initial sale of the Bonds to the public (including a member of a selling group or a party to a third-party distribution agreement participating in the initial sale of the Bonds to the public), (iii) a purchaser of any of the Bonds is a "related party" to an underwriter if the underwriter and the purchaser are subject, directly or indirectly, to (A) more than 50% common ownership of the voting power or the total value of their stock, if both entities are corporations (including direct ownership by one corporation of another), (B) more than 50% common ownership of their capital interests or profits interests, if both entities are partnerships (including direct ownership by one partnership of another), or (C) more than 50% common ownership of the value of the outstanding stock of the corporation or the capital interests or profit interests of the partnership, as applicable, if one entity is a corporation and the other entity is a partnership (including direct ownership of the applicable stock or interests by one entity of the other), and (iv) "sale date" means the date that the Bonds are awarded by the City to the winning bidder. PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT Bidders may obtain a copy of the Preliminary Official Statement relating to the Bonds prior to the proposal opening by request from Ehlers at www.ehlers-inc.com by connecting to the Bond Sales link. The Underwriter (Syndicate Manager) will be provided with an electronic copy of the Final Official Statement within seven business days of the proposal acceptance. Up to 10 printed copies of the Final Official Statement will be provided upon request. Additional copies of the Final Official Statement will be available at a cost of $10.00 per copy. Information for bidders and proposal forms may be obtained from Ehlers at 3001 Broadway Street, Suite 320, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55413, Telephone (651) 697-8500. By Order of the City Council City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota E-7 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 82 PROPOSAL FORM The City Council July 6, 2026 City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota (the "City") RE: $9,930,000* General Obligation Bonds, Series 2026A (the "Bonds") DATED: July 28, 2026 For all or none of the above Bonds, in accordance with the Terms of Proposal and terms of the Global Book-Entry System (unless otherwise specified by the Purchaser) as stated in this Official Statement, we will pay you $__________________ (not less than $9,810,840) plus accrued interest to date of delivery for fully registered Bonds bearing interest rates and maturing in the stated years as follows: % due 2028 % due 2033 % due 2038 % due 2029 % due 2034 % due 2039 % due 2030 % due 2035 % due 2040 % due 2031 % due 2036 % due 2041 % due 2032 % due 2037 % due 2042 The City reserves the right to increase or decrease the principal amount of the Bonds on the day of sale, in increments of $5,000 each. Increases or decreases may be made in any maturity. If any principal amounts are adjusted, the purchase price proposed will be adjusted to maintain the same gross spread per $1,000. The rate for any maturity may not be more than 2.00% less than the rate for any preceding maturity. (For example, if a rate of 4.50% is proposed for the 2028 maturity, then the lowest rate that may be proposed for any later maturity is 2.50%.)All Bonds of the same maturity must bear interest from date of issue until paid at a single, uniform rate. Each rate must be expressed in an integral multiple of 5/100 or 1/8 of 1%. A good faith deposit ("Deposit") in the amount of $198,600 shall be made by the winning bidder by wire transfer of funds. Such Deposit shall be received by Ehlers no later than two hours after the proposal opening time. Wire transfer instructions will be provided to the winning bidder by Ehlers after the tabulation of proposals. The City reserves the right to award the Bonds to a winning bidder whose wire transfer is initiated but not received by such time provided that such winning bidder's federal wire reference number has been received by such time. In the event the Deposit is not received as provided above, the City may award the Bonds to the bidder submitting the next best proposal provided such bidder agrees to such award. The Deposit will be retained by the City as liquidated damages if the proposal is accepted and the Purchaser fails to comply therewith. We agree to the conditions and duties of Ehlers and Associates, Inc., as escrow holder of the Deposit, pursuant to the Terms of Proposal. This proposal is for prompt acceptance and is conditional upon delivery of said Bonds to The Depository Trust Company, New York, New York, in accordance with the Terms of Proposal. Delivery is anticipated to be on or about July 28, 2026. This proposal is subject to the City's agreement to enter into a written undertaking to provide continuing disclosure under Rule 15c2-12 promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as described in the Preliminary Official Statement for the Bonds. We have received and reviewed the Official Statement, and any addenda thereto, and have submitted our requests for additional information or corrections to the Final Official Statement. As Underwriter (Syndicate Manager), we agree to provide the City with the reoffering price of the Bonds within 24 hours of the proposal acceptance. This proposal is a firm offer for the purchase of the Bonds identified in the Terms of Proposal, on the terms set forth in this proposal form and the Terms of Proposal, and is not subject to any conditions, except as permitted by the Terms of Proposal. By submitting this proposal, we confirm that we are an underwriter and have an established industry reputation for underwriting new issuances of municipal bonds. YES: ____ NO: ____. If the competitive sale requirements are not met, we elect to use either the: _____10% test, or the _____hold-the-offering-price rule to determine the issue price of the Bonds. Account Manager:By: Account Members: Award will be on a true interest cost basis. According to our computations (the correct computation being controlling in the award), the total dollar interest cost (including any discount or less any premium) computed from July 28, 2026 of the above proposal is $_______________and the true interest cost (TIC) is __________%. The foregoing offer is hereby accepted by and on behalf of the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, on July 6, 2026. By:By: Title:Title: City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 83 July 6, 2026 SALE DAY REPORT FOR: City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2026A Prepared by: Ehlers 3001 Broadway Street, Suite 320 Minneapolis, MN 55413 Stacie Kvilvang, Senior Municipal Advisor Jason Aarsvold, Senior Municipal Advisor Keith Dahl, Senior Municipal Advisor BUILDING COMMUNITIES. IT’S WHAT WE DO. City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 84 Sale Day Report for City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota 1 Competitive Sale Results PURPOSE: For the purposes of financing capital projects in the City including Phase II of the Cedar Lake and Louisiana road and utility reconstruction, the 2026 water utility projects, Connect the Park and improvements to the Police Department Facility. RATING: S&P Global Ratings "AAA" / Stable NUMBER OF BIDS: 12 LOW BIDDER: Baird, Milwaukee, Wisconsin COMPARISON FROM LOWEST TO HIGHEST BID: (TIC as bid) LOW BID:* 3.3478% HIGH BID: 3.5635% Summary of Sale Results: Principal Amount*: $9,930,000 Underwriter’s Discount: $83,971 Reoffering Premium: $942,549 True Interest Cost: 3.3611% Costs of Issuance: $92,630 Yield:2.39%-3.60% Total Net P&I $13,820,444 NOTES: The Bonds maturing February 1, 2036 and thereafter are callable February 1, 2035 or any date thereafter. CLOSING DATE: July 28, 2026 CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Adopt a resolution awarding the sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2026A. SUPPLEMENTARY ATTACHMENTS •Bid Tabulation •Sources and Uses of Funds & Updated Debt Service Schedules •Rating Report (Provided to City by S & P via email) •Bond Resolution (Distributed in City Council Packets) City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 85 BID TABULATION $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2026A City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota SALE: July 6, 2026 AWARD: BAIRD Rating: S&P Global Ratings "AAA" / Stable Tax Exempt - Bank Qualified NAME OF INSTITUTION MATURITY (February 1) COUPON RATE REOFFERING YIELD PRICE TRUE INTEREST RATE BAIRD $10,784,913.10 3.3478% Milwaukee, Wisconsin 2028 5.000% 2.390% C.L. King & Associates Colliers Securities LLC Edward Jones Fidelity Capital Markets Crews & Associates, Inc. SouthState Securities Bernardi Securities, Inc. Oppenheimer & Co. The Baker Group Middlegate Securities Alliance Global Partners CADZ Securities Inc Celadon Financial Group, LLC Isaak Bond Investments, Inc Carty, Harding & Hearn, Inc. United Bankers Bank FMS Bonds Inc. First Kentucky Securities Corp. Midland Securities Multi Bank Securities Inc. First Southern LLC Dinosaur Financial Group First Bankers' Banc Securities, Inc Mountainside Securities LLC Blaylock Van, LLC Valdes and Moreno Commerce Brokerage Services Inc Falcon Square Capital Caldwell Sutter Capital, Inc. ZIONS BANK, division of ZB, N.A. Institutional Bond Network LLC 2029 5.000% 2.480% 2030 5.000% 2.540% 2031 5.000% 2.620% 2032 5.000% 2.680% 2033 5.000% 2.780% 2034 5.000% 2.850% 2035 5.000% 2.930% 2036 5.000% 3.000% 2037 5.000% 3.120% 2038 4.000% 3.400% 2039 4.000% 3.450% 2040 4.000% 3.500% 2041 4.000% 3.550% 2042 4.000% 3.600% *Subsequent to bid opening the individual maturity amounts were adjusted. Adjusted Price: $10,788,578.15 Adjusted Net Interest Cost: $3,031,866.01 Adjusted TIC: 3.3611% City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 86 NAME OF INSTITUTION TRUE INTEREST RATE Bid Tabulation July 6, 2026 City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2026A Page 2 NORTHLAND SECURITIES, INC. 3.3604% Minneapolis, Minnesota BOK FINANCIAL SECURITIES, INC. 3.3802% Milwaukee, Wisconsin PIPER SANDLER & CO. 3.3895% Minneapolis, Minnesota TD FINANCIAL PRODUCTS LLC 3.3898% New York, New York RAYMOND JAMES & ASSOCIATES, INC. 3.4004% St. Petersburg, Florida STIFEL, NICOLAUS & COMPANY, INCORPORATED 3.4068% Birmingham, Alabama BROWNSTONE INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC 3.4196% New York, New York STONEX FINANCIAL INC 3.4241% Atlanta, Georgia HILLTOPSECURITIES 3.4387% Dallas, Texas HUNTINGTON SECURITIES, INC 3.4399% Chicago, Illinois LOOP CAPITAL MARKETS LLC 3.5635% New York, New York City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 87 City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2026A Issue Summary Total Issue Sources And Uses Dated 07/28/2026 | Delivered 07/28/2026 Street Reconstruction Connect the Park Police Station Water Revenue Issue Summary Sources Of Funds Par Amount of Bonds $5,985,000.00 $440,000.00 $940,000.00 $2,565,000.00 $9,930,000.00 Reoffering Premium 505,725.70 52,465.75 79,738.70 304,619.00 942,549.15 Total Sources $6,490,725.70 $492,465.75 $1,019,738.70 $2,869,619.00 $10,872,549.15 Uses Of Funds Total Underwriter's Discount (0.846%)50,610.92 3,720.77 7,948.92 21,690.39 83,971.00 Costs of Issuance 55,829.87 4,104.46 8,768.59 23,927.08 92,630.00 Deposit to Project Construction Fund 6,384,284.91 484,640.52 1,003,021.19 2,824,001.53 10,695,948.15 Total Uses $6,490,725.70 $492,465.75 $1,019,738.70 $2,869,619.00 $10,872,549.15 Series 2026A GO Bonds - F | Issue Summary | 7/ 6/2026 | 11:04 AM City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 88 City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2026A Issue Summary Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Fiscal Total 07/28/2026 ----- 08/01/2027 --471,194.16 471,194.16 - 02/01/2028 350,000.00 5.000%233,650.00 583,650.00 1,054,844.16 08/01/2028 --224,900.00 224,900.00 - 02/01/2029 600,000.00 5.000%224,900.00 824,900.00 1,049,800.00 08/01/2029 --209,900.00 209,900.00 - 02/01/2030 635,000.00 5.000%209,900.00 844,900.00 1,054,800.00 08/01/2030 --194,025.00 194,025.00 - 02/01/2031 660,000.00 5.000%194,025.00 854,025.00 1,048,050.00 08/01/2031 --177,525.00 177,525.00 - 02/01/2032 700,000.00 5.000%177,525.00 877,525.00 1,055,050.00 08/01/2032 --160,025.00 160,025.00 - 02/01/2033 735,000.00 5.000%160,025.00 895,025.00 1,055,050.00 08/01/2033 --141,650.00 141,650.00 - 02/01/2034 775,000.00 5.000%141,650.00 916,650.00 1,058,300.00 08/01/2034 --122,275.00 122,275.00 - 02/01/2035 810,000.00 5.000%122,275.00 932,275.00 1,054,550.00 08/01/2035 --102,025.00 102,025.00 - 02/01/2036 850,000.00 5.000%102,025.00 952,025.00 1,054,050.00 08/01/2036 --80,775.00 80,775.00 - 02/01/2037 895,000.00 5.000%80,775.00 975,775.00 1,056,550.00 08/01/2037 --58,400.00 58,400.00 - 02/01/2038 540,000.00 4.000%58,400.00 598,400.00 656,800.00 08/01/2038 --47,600.00 47,600.00 - 02/01/2039 560,000.00 4.000%47,600.00 607,600.00 655,200.00 08/01/2039 --36,400.00 36,400.00 - 02/01/2040 585,000.00 4.000%36,400.00 621,400.00 657,800.00 08/01/2040 --24,700.00 24,700.00 - 02/01/2041 605,000.00 4.000%24,700.00 629,700.00 654,400.00 08/01/2041 --12,600.00 12,600.00 - 02/01/2042 630,000.00 4.000%12,600.00 642,600.00 655,200.00 Total $9,930,000.00 -$3,890,444.16 $13,820,444.16 - Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars $85,742.75 Average Life 8.635 Years Average Coupon 4.5373447% Net Interest Cost (NIC)3.5360028% True Interest Cost (TIC)3.3611688% Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 3.0773716% All Inclusive Cost (AIC)3.4840441% IRS Form 8038 Net Interest Cost 3.1608779% Weighted Average Maturity 8.578 Years Series 2026A GO Bonds - F | Issue Summary | 7/ 6/2026 | 11:04 AM City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 89 City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2026A Issue Summary Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I 105% of Total Water Revenue Levy/(Surplus) 02/01/2027 ------- 02/01/2028 350,000.00 5.000%704,844.16 1,054,844.16 1,107,586.37 355,365.94 752,220.43 02/01/2029 600,000.00 5.000%449,800.00 1,049,800.00 1,102,290.00 358,050.00 744,240.00 02/01/2030 635,000.00 5.000%419,800.00 1,054,800.00 1,107,540.00 357,000.00 750,540.00 02/01/2031 660,000.00 5.000%388,050.00 1,048,050.00 1,100,452.50 355,425.00 745,027.50 02/01/2032 700,000.00 5.000%355,050.00 1,055,050.00 1,107,802.50 358,575.00 749,227.50 02/01/2033 735,000.00 5.000%320,050.00 1,055,050.00 1,107,802.50 355,687.50 752,115.00 02/01/2034 775,000.00 5.000%283,300.00 1,058,300.00 1,111,215.00 357,525.00 753,690.00 02/01/2035 810,000.00 5.000%244,550.00 1,054,550.00 1,107,277.50 358,575.00 748,702.50 02/01/2036 850,000.00 5.000%204,050.00 1,054,050.00 1,106,752.50 358,837.50 747,915.00 02/01/2037 895,000.00 5.000%161,550.00 1,056,550.00 1,109,377.50 358,312.50 751,065.00 02/01/2038 540,000.00 4.000%116,800.00 656,800.00 689,640.00 -689,640.00 02/01/2039 560,000.00 4.000%95,200.00 655,200.00 687,960.00 -687,960.00 02/01/2040 585,000.00 4.000%72,800.00 657,800.00 690,690.00 -690,690.00 02/01/2041 605,000.00 4.000%49,400.00 654,400.00 687,120.00 -687,120.00 02/01/2042 630,000.00 4.000%25,200.00 655,200.00 687,960.00 -687,960.00 Total $9,930,000.00 -$3,890,444.16 $13,820,444.16 $14,511,466.37 $3,573,353.44 $10,938,112.93 Significant Dates Dated 7/28/2026 First Coupon Date 8/01/2027 Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars $85,742.75 Average Life 8.635 Years Average Coupon 4.5373447% Net Interest Cost (NIC)3.5360028% True Interest Cost (TIC)3.3611688% Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 3.0773716% All Inclusive Cost (AIC)3.4840441% Series 2026A GO Bonds - F | Issue Summary | 7/ 6/2026 | 11:04 AM City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution approving sale of $9,930,000 General Obligation Bonds, series 2026A Page 90 Meeting: City council Meeting date: July 6, 2026 Consent agenda item: 5e Executive summary Title: Resolution amending change order policy Recommended action: Motion to adopt a resolution rescinding Resolution No. 09-116 and authorizing the city manager authority to administratively approve change orders for amounts under the amount at which competitive bids are required by state law Policy consideration: Does the city council want to rescind Resolution No. 09-116 and adopt a resolution amending the change order policy to grant the city manager authority pursuant to the city charter? Summary: Staff recommends the city council update the change order authority to match the authorization established in the city charter. In 1987, the city council granted the limited authority to administratively approve change orders to the city manager to reduce duplication of effort and to maximize organization efficiency. This authority was last updated in 2009 by Resolution No. 09-116. The city charter designates the city manager is the chief purchasing agent of the city, authorizing them (or their designee) to make all purchases and execute all contracts on behalf of the city. The city council’s approval is required only when a purchase or contract amount exceeds the amount at which competitive bids are required by law. All other contracts, bonds and instruments must be signed by the mayor and city manager on behalf of the city. Financial or budget considerations: Relevant projects are included in the city’s operating or CIP budgets. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to being a city that delivers reliable services, uses city resources responsibly, operates transparently and builds strong relationships with residents. Supporting documents: Discussion, change order policy update draft, resolution Prepared by: Marina Lee, engineering office assistant Reviewed by: Cheyenne Brodeen, administrative services director Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5e) Page 2 Title: Resolution amending change order policy Discussion Background: In 2009, the city council adopted a change order policy to update the process by which change orders were made to construction and public improvement contracts. Under the current policy, change orders require the following approval: • Upon verification that appropriate and prudent funding is available and/or appropriate reductions in the contract are in the best interest of the city, the city manager or designee may approve change order under $100,000. • The city manager may not approve change orders for a contract that cumulatively exceed $100,000. The city manager may not approve supplemental agreements and: • May not issue change orders which materially change the scope of the contract, including additional project costs, and; • City manager or designee shall report time extension to the city council, and; • City council approval is required for all other change orders and for all supplemental agreements. Present considerations: Pursuant to St. Louis Park City Charter Section 5.05 “Purchases and contracts”, the city manager is designated as the chief purchasing agent of the city. In 2009, $100,000 matched the state law threshold for competitive bidding. State law has since increased this threshold to $175,000. To prevent the need for repetitive housekeeping amendments in the future, staff recommends tying the city manager’s administrative authority directly to the state-mandated competitive bidding threshold rather than a fixed dollar amount. This change will ensure the city’s policy automatically adjusts to future state law updates. City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5e) Page 3 Title: Resolution amending change order policy Change Order Policy Update 1. Purpose The purpose of this policy is to update the procedure to process change orders to construction and public improvement contracts. 2. Definitions • Change order – a written amendment to a construction or public improvement contract that is within the scope of the original contract. • Supplemental agreement – a written amendment to a construction or public improvement contract changing the scope of the original contract. 3. Background Change orders in construction contracts are commonplace. The design process cannot economically provide sufficient detail to completely identify all items of construction work. There is no “typical” change order amount, however, there are generally accepted percentages (as compared to the total construction contract amount). Change orders are the result of the following conditions: • Owner requested: Work desired that was not clearly called for in the original contract documents and could result in adding to or removing from a project or contract. • Changed condition – foreseen conditions: Work involving existing conditions or construction that was not clearly shown or identified in the original contract documents that directly affect construction work methods, Material/ labor costs or time. • Changed condition – unforeseen conditions: work that could not have been reasonably identified by the designer in the initial design phase. • Code change: construction codes have changed since the design was completed. • Design deficiency – added value: work that would have resulted in a higher bid price had the design detail or drawing been correct in the contract documents. • Design deficiency – no added value: work clearly results from a design deficiency, error, or omission, but would not have resulted in an increased bid price if the contract documents were correct. 4. Procedure Change orders require the following approval: • Upon verification that appropriate and prudent funding is available and/ or appropriate reductions in the contract are in the best interest of the city, the city manager or designee may approve change orders under their statutory spending authority. The city manager may not approve change orders for a contract that cumulatively exceeds the competitive bid threshold. • The city manager or designee may not approve supplemental agreements or issue change orders which materially change the scope of the contract, including additional projects. • The city manager or designee shall report time extensions to the city council. • City council approval is required for all other change orders and for all supplemental agreements. City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5e) Page 4 Title: Resolution amending change order policy Resolution No. 26-___ Adopting change order policy Whereas, to expedite the approval of change orders that are within the city manager’s purchasing authority, it is in the best interest of the city to update the change order policy; and Whereas, the city council approved Resolution No. 09-116 on Sept. 9, 2009, adopting a change order policy to update the procedure to process change orders to construction and public improvement contracts; and Whereas, in accordance with city charter, the city manager is the chief purchasing agent of the city. The charter also states that city contracts must be made in compliance with state law; and Whereas, state law has increased the level of purchasing limits and the city council in interested in increasing the level allowed for the city manager to administratively approve change orders with limitations, Now therefore be it resolved by the city council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, that Resolution No. 09-116 is hereby rescinded and the change order policy is amended to grant the city manager change order authority in accordance with the city charter and state law. Reviewed for administration:  Adopted by the city council July 6, 2026: Kim Keller, city manager  Nadia Mohamed, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk    Meeting: City council Meeting date: July 6, 2026 Consent agenda item: 5f Executive summary Title: Adopt ordinance amending chapter 3 of the city code related to temporary liquor licenses Recommended action: Motion to approve second reading and adopt ordinance amending city code chapter 3 related to temporary liquor licenses and to approve summary ordinance for publication. Policy consideration: Does the city council want to amend the city code to allow temporary liquor licenses to be issued to brewers and microdistillers as allowed by M.S. 340A.404 subdivision 10(c)? Summary: Minnesota statute 340A.404 subdivision 10(c) allows the governing body of a municipality to issue temporary on-sale intoxicating liquor licenses to brewers who manufacture fewer than 3,500 barrels of malt liquor in a year or to a microdistillery for social events sponsored by the brewer or microdistiller within the community. City code regulations related to liquor licensing can be more restrictive, but not less restrictive, than state law. Chapter 3 of St. Louis Park's city code currently allows temporary intoxicating liquor licenses to be issued to specific types of organizations; microdistillers and/or brewers are currently not eligible to apply for a temporary license. There are three breweries and two microdistilleries located in St. Louis Park. Their current liquor license allows them to serve and sell the alcohol they manufacture. Representatives of all five establishments requested that the city consider amending chapter 3 of the city code regarding temporary liquor licenses to align with state statute. The amendment will allow these businesses to obtain temporary liquor licenses, subject to the requirements in state law, to host social events on their licensed premises and serve/sell alcohol during the event that is not manufactured by the brewery or microdistillery. Existing temporary on-sale intoxicating liquor license limitations, fees and processes would apply. The first reading of the ordinance was approved June 15, 2026. If the second reading is approved, the effective date for the proposed amendment is July 31, 2026. Financial or budget considerations: Applicants are subject to fees set annually in Appendix A. The fee for each day of a temporary on-sale intoxicating liquor license is $100, payable to the city to offset administrative costs. Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: Discussion, draft ordinance, summary for publication Prepared by: Amanda Scott-Lerdal, deputy city clerk Reviewed by: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5f) Page 2 Title: Adopt ordinance amending chapter 3 of the city code related to temporary liquor licenses Discussion Background: Minnesota statute 340A.404 subdivision 10(c) allows the governing body of a municipality to issue temporary on-sale intoxicating liquor licenses to brewers who manufacture fewer than 3,500 barrels of malt liquor in a year or to a microdistillery for social events sponsored by the brewer or microdistiller within the community. City code regarding liquor licensing can be more restrictive, but not less restrictive, than state statute. Chapter 3 of St. Louis Park's city code currently allows temporary intoxicating liquor licenses to be issued to clubs, charitable, religious or nonprofit organizations. Microdistillers and/or brewers are not currently eligible to apply for temporary licenses and are limited to serving and selling the alcohol manufactured onsite unless they contract with a licensed caterer to serve other types of alcohol at events hosted on their premises. Present considerations: The city clerk’s office consulted with the city attorney. Their opinion is that the city may amend its code regarding temporary on-sale intoxicating liquor licenses to allow brewers and microdistillers to apply for and obtain this license type, subject to the requirements of state law. Should the council consider such a code amendment, the city attorney noted that the state's restrictions for this license type would also apply: • License may authorize on-sale of intoxicating liquor for not more than four consecutive days and the city may issue no more than 12 days’ worth of temporary licenses to any one entity; • License may authorize on-sales on premises other than premises the licensee owns or permanently occupies; • License may allow licensee to contract for intoxicating liquor catering services with the holder of a full-year city on-sale intoxicating liquor license; • License is subject to additional terms and license fee imposed by the city; • All other laws/ordinances governing sale of intoxicating liquor apply; • License must first be approved by the commissioner of public safety. Future and legal considerations include staff’s responsibility to be aware of any future updates to applicable state laws related to temporary liquor licenses. The city clerk’s office will continue the current practice of collaboration with related departments to monitor alcohol compliance, event safety and planning. Applicants are subject to fees as annually set in Appendix A. The fee for each day for a temporary on-sale intoxicating liquor license is $100, payable to the city to offset administrative costs. Next steps: If council approves second reading, the effective date of change is July 31, 2026. City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5f) Page 3 Title: Adopt ordinance amending chapter 3 of the city code related to temporary liquor licenses Ordinance No. ___-26 Amending St. Louis Park City Code chapter 3, section 57(h) related to temporary on-sale intoxicating liquor licenses The city council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota does ordain: Section 1. St. Louis Park City Code chapter 3, section 3-57(h) is amended as follows by deleting strikethrough language and adding underlined language: St. Louis Park City Code Section 3-57. Types of licenses. The following types of licenses shall be issued under this division: h. Temporary on-sale intoxicating liquor license. Temporary on-sale intoxicating liquor licenses, with the approval of the Commissioner of Public Safety, may be issued to organizations, political committees, microdistillers and brewers authorized under Minnesota State Statute 340A.404 subdivision 10(a) and (c)clubs, charitable, religious, or other nonprofit organizations which have been in existence for at least three years, or to a state-registered political committee, in connection with a social event within the city sponsored by the licensee. No license shall be for longer than four consecutive days, and the city shall issue no more than 12 days’ worth of temporary licenses to any one organization, political committee, microdistiller or brewer in one calendar year. The license may provide that the licensee may contract for intoxicating liquor catering services with the holder of a full year on-sale intoxicating liquor license issued by any municipality. The license may authorize on-sales on premises other than premises the licensee owns or permanently occupies. Licenses issued under this subsection are subject to all laws and ordinances governing the sale of intoxicating liquor, except that mandatory liability provisions in M.S. § 340A.409 do not apply, and those other laws and ordinances which, by their nature, are not applicable. Brewers and microdistillers are subject to M.S. § 340A.409, subdivisions 1 through 3a. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect fifteen days after its passage and publication. First Reading June 15, 2026 Second Reading July 6, 2026 Publication July 16, 2026 Effective date July 31, 2026 Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council July 6, 2026. By: __________________________________ By: __________________________________ Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor Attest: Approved as to form and execution: ____________________________________ _____________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Soren M. Mattick, city attorney City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5f) Page 4 Title: Adopt ordinance amending chapter 3 of the city code related to temporary liquor licenses SUMMARY FOR PUBLICATION Ordinance No.____-26 Ordinance amending St. Louis Park City Code chapter 3, section 57(h) related to temporary on-sale intoxicating liquor licenses This ordinance amends St. Louis Park City Code chapter 3, section 57(h) related to temporary on-sale intoxicating liquor licenses to authorize issuance of temporary licenses to brewers and microdistillers to align with what is authorized under M.S. 340A.04, subd. 10 (a) and (c). The ordinance shall take effect July 31, 2026 Adopted by the city council July 6, 2026 Nadia Mohamed /s/ Mayor A copy of the full text of this ordinance is available for inspection with the city clerk. Published in St. Louis Park Sun Sailor: July 16, 2026 Meeting: City council Meeting date: July 6, 2026 Consent agenda item: 5g Executive summary Title: Approve temporary on-sale intoxicating liquor license - Church of the Holy Family Recommended action: Motion to approve a temporary on-sale intoxicating liquor license for Church of the Holy Family at 5900 West Lake Street on Sept. 12, 2026. Policy consideration: Does the applicant meet the requirements for issuance of a temporary on-sale intoxicating liquor license? Summary: Church of the Holy Family applied for a temporary on-sale intoxicating liquor license for a fundraising event taking place on Sept. 12, 2026. The fundraiser will be held at 5900 West Lake Street in the parking lot area, which will be closed off, and liquor will be served between 11:00 a.m. and 11:30 p.m. State law and city code permit the issuance of temporary on-sale intoxicating liquor licenses to charitable, religious or non-profit organizations. The license may authorize the on-sale of intoxicating liquor for not more than four consecutive days. The licenses are subject to the terms, including a license fee, imposed by the issuing municipality. Licenses issued under this subdivision are subject to all laws and ordinances governing the sale of intoxicating liquor except M.S. 340A.409 and M.S. 340A.504, subdivision 3, paragraph (d), and those laws and ordinances which by their nature are not applicable. The police department completed a background investigation and found no reason to deny the temporary license. The applicant meets all requirements for the issuance of the license and staff recommends approval. Financial or budget considerations: The fee for a temporary liquor license is $100 per day of the event. Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: None. Prepared by: Amanda Scott-Lerdal, deputy city clerk Reviewed by: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager Meeting: City council Meeting date: July 6, 2026 Consent agenda item: 5h Executive summary Title: Resolution authorizing final payment for the 2025 Sanitary Sewer Mainline Rehabilitation project (4025-3000) Recommended action: Motion to adopt resolution accepting work and authorizing final payment in the amount of $98,304.18 for the 2025 Sanitary Sewer Mainline Rehabilitation project with Insituform Technologies USA, LLC – City Contract No. 140-25. Policy consideration: Not applicable. Summary: On Aug. 4, 2025, the city council awarded the bid for the sanitary sewer mainline rehabilitation project. The project was advertised, bid and awarded to Insituform Technologies USA, LLC in the amount of $618,823.00. This project consists of trenchless repair of sanitary sewer throughout the city. This work allows the city to address structural defects in sanitary sewer pipes before they lead to severe problems like infiltration, sewer blockages (backups) or pipe collapse. The contractor completed this work within the contract time allowed and the final contract amount is $18,704.54 (2.7%) less than the bid resulting in a final construction cost of $600,118.46. Financial or budget considerations: The cost of the work performed by the contractor under contract no. 140-25 has been calculated as follows: Original contract (based on estimated quantities) $618,823.00 Quantity underruns -$18,704.54 Final contract cost $600,118.46 Previous payments -$501,814.28 Balance due $98,304.18 Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to being a city that delivers reliable services, uses city resources responsibly, operates transparently and builds strong relationships with residents. Supporting documents: Resolution Prepared by: Sarah Schweiger, engineering services manager Reviewed by: Debra Heiser, engineering director Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager Page 2 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5h) Title: Resolution authorizing final payment for the 2025 Sanitary Sewer Mainline Rehabilitation project (4025- 3000) Resolution No. 26-___ Authorizing final payment and accepting work for 2025 Sanitary Sewer Mainline Rehabilitation project City Project No. 4025-3000 Contract No. 140-25 Be it resolved by the city council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, as follows: 1.Pursuant to a written contract with the city dated August 4, 2025, Insituform Technologies USA, LCC has satisfactorily completed the 2025 Sanitary Sewer Mainline Rehabilitation project, as per Contract No. 140-25. 2.The engineering director has filed her recommendations for final acceptance of the work. 3.The work completed under this contract is accepted and approved. The final contract cost is $600,118.46 4.The city manager is directed to make final payment in the amount of $98,304.18 on this contract, taking the contractor's receipt in full. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council July 6, 2026: Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Meeting: City council Meeting date: July 6, 2026 Consent agenda item: 5i Executive summary Title: Resolution approving grant agreement with MnDOT for Cedar Lake Road and Louisiana Avenue Improvement project - Ward 4 Recommended action: Adopt resolution approving grant agreement with MnDOT for Cedar Lake Road and Louisiana Avenue Improvement project - Phase 2 (project no. 4024-1100). Policy consideration: None Summary: As part of the 2023 state legislative session, the State of Minnesota appropriated $5,000,000 to the city to complete the Cedar Lake Road and Louisiana Avenue Improvement projects. In 2024, city council authorized three separate grant agreements with the state. To date, the city has been reimbursed $4,105,052.89 and anticipates receiving an additional $254,900.42 in engineering and administration cost reimbursements this year. Amount Total State appropriation (Local Road Improvement Fund) amount $5,000,000.00 Tree removal agreement 163-296-008 – complete $19,455.00 Right of way acquisition (Phase 1: 4023-1100) agreement 163-296-009 – complete $434,365.45 Engineering and administration agreement 163-296-010 – reimbursed to date $3,651,232.44 Engineering and administration agreement 163-296-010 – expected funds $254,900.42 Remaining amount $640,046.69 The remaining amount of $640,046.69 will be used to fund a portion of the right of way acquisition costs for phase 2 of the project (4024-1100). To receive the funds, a new grant agreement with the state needs to be approved. Financial or budget considerations: This project is included in the city's capital improvement plan (CIP). The total project cost for Phase 1 and 2of the Cedar Lake Road and Louisiana Avenue is estimated at $28,614,956.15. A summary of the funding for this project follow: Funding source Municipal state aid $6,293,252.68 General obligation bonds $3,344,955.03 Local funds (franchise fees) $84,742.20 Stormwater fee revenue $1,142,207.51 Sanitary sewer fee revenue $348,978.31 Watermain revenue bond proceeds $3,400,820.42 State appropriation (Local Road Improvement Fund) $5,000,000.00 Congressionally directed spending (federal) $2,000,000.00 Federal aid $7,000,000.00 Total $28,614,956.15 Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing safe, reliable and well- maintained infrastructure and neighborhoods that connect people and places with an emphasis on walking, biking and transit. Supporting documents: Resolution Prepared by: Aaron Wiesen, engineering project manager Reviewed by: Debra Heiser, engineering director Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5i) Page 2 Title: Resolution approving grant agreement with MnDOT for Cedar Lake Road and Louisiana Avenue Improvement project - Ward 4 Resolution No. 26-___ Local Road Improvement Grant Agreement Grant Terms and Conditions SAP 163-296-007 Whereas, the City of St. Louis Park has applied to the Commissioner of Transportation for a grant from the Local Road Improvement Fund; and Whereas, the Commissioner of Transportation has given notice that funding for this project is available; and Whereas, the amount of the grant has been determined to be $ 640,046.69 by reason of the lowest responsible bid, Now therefore be it resolved that the City of St. Louis Park does hereby agree to the terms and conditions of the grant consistent with Minnesota Statutes, section 174.52, and will pay any additional amount by which the cost exceeds the estimate and will return to the Local Road Improvement Fund any amount appropriated for the project but not required. The mayor, the city manager and the engineering director are authorized to execute a grant agreement and any amendments thereto with the Commissioner of Transportation concerning the above-referenced grant. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council July 6, 2026: Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Meeting: City council Meeting date: July 6, 2026 Consent agenda item: 5j Executive summary Title: Resolution authorizing special assessment for sewer service line repair at 3340 Rhode Island Avenue South – Ward 3 Recommended action: Motion to adopt a resolution authorizing the special assessment for the repair of the sewer service line at 3340 Rhode Island Avenue South, St. Louis Park, Minnesota. P.I.D. 17-117-21-23-0046 Policy consideration: The proposed action is consistent with policy previously established by the city council. Summary: Thomas Jacobson and Linda Reeve, owners of the single-family residence at 3340 Rhode Island Avenue South have requested the city authorize the repair of the sewer service line for their home and assess the cost against the property in accordance with the city’s special assessment policy. The city requires the repair of service lines to promote the general public health, safety and welfare within the community. The special assessment policy for the repair or replacement of water and/or sewer service lines for existing homes was adopted by the city council in 1996. This program was put into place because sometimes property owners face financial hardships when emergency repairs like this are unexpectedly required. Plans and permits for this service line repair work were completed, submitted and approved by city staff. The property owners hired a contractor and repaired the sewer service line in compliance with current codes and regulations. Based on the completed work, this repair qualifies for the city’s special assessment program. The property owners have petitioned the city to authorize the sewer service line repair and special assess the cost of the repair. The total eligible cost of the repair has been determined to be $13,360. Financial or budget considerations: The city has funds in place to finance the cost of this special assessment. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to being a city that delivers reliable services, uses city resources responsibly, operates transparently and builds strong relationships with residents. Supporting documents: Resolution Prepared by: Beth Holida, office assistant Reviewed by: Emily Carr, assessing technician Stacy M. Voelker, administrative coordinator Austin Holm, utilities superintendent Jay Hall, public works director Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5j) Page 2 Title: Resolution authorizing special assessment for sewer service line repair at 3340 Rhode Island Avenue South – Ward 3 Resolution No. 26-___ Authorizing the special assessment for the repair of the sewer service line at 3340 Rhode Island Avenue South, St. Louis Park, MN P.I.D. 17-117-21-23-0046 Whereas, the property owners at 3340 Rhode Island Avenue South have petitioned the City of St. Louis Park to authorize a special assessment for the repair of the sewer service line for the single-family residence located at 3340 Rhode Island Avenue South; and Whereas, the property owners have agreed to waive the right to a public hearing, right of notice and right of appeal pursuant to Minnesota Statute, Chapter 429; and Whereas, the city council of the City of St. Louis Park has received a report from the Utility Superintendent related to the repair of the sewer service line, Now therefore be it resolved by the city council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, that: 1.The petition from the property owners requesting approval and special assessment for the sewer service line repair is hereby accepted. 2.The sewer service line repair that was done in conformance with the plans and specifications approved by the Public Works Department and Department of Inspections is hereby accepted. 3.The total cost for the repair of the sewer service line is accepted at $13,360. 4.The property owners have agreed to waive the right to a public hearing, notice and appeal from the special assessment, whether provided by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, or by other statutes, or by ordinance, City Charter, the constitution or common law. 5.The property owners have agreed to pay the city for the total cost of the above improvements through a special assessment over a ten (10) year period at the interest rate of 5.75%. 6.The property owners have executed an agreement with the city and all other documents necessary to implement the repair of the sewer service line and the special assessment of all costs associated therewith. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council July 6, 2026: Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Meeting: City council Meeting date: July 6, 2026 Consent agenda item: 5k Executive summary Title: Resolution approving special assessment for sewer service line repair at 3920 Lynn Avenue South - Ward 2 Recommended action: Motion to adopt a resolution authorizing the special assessment for the repair of the sewer service line at 3920 Lynn Avenue South, St. Louis Park, Minnesota. P.I.D. 07-028-24-12-0107 Policy consideration: The proposed action is consistent with policy previously established by the city council. Summary: Jeffery Olson and Kelly Peterson, owners of the single-family residence at 3920 Lynn Avenue South, have requested the city authorize the repair of the sewer service line for their home and assess the cost against the property in accordance with the city’s special assessment policy. The city requires the repair of service lines to promote the general public health, safety and welfare within the community. The special assessment policy for the repair or replacement of water and/or sewer service lines for existing homes was adopted by the city council in 1996. This program was put into place because sometimes property owners face financial hardships when emergency repairs like this are unexpectedly required. Plans and permits for this service line repair work were completed, submitted and approved by city staff. The property owners hired a contractor and repaired the sewer service line in compliance with current codes and regulations. Based on the completed work, this repair qualifies for the city’s special assessment program. The property owners have petitioned the city to authorize the sewer service line repair and special assess the cost of the repair. The total eligible cost of the repair has been determined to be $9,540. Financial or budget considerations: The city has funds in place to finance the cost of this special assessment. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to being a city that delivers reliable services, uses city resources responsibly, operates transparently and builds strong relationships with residents. Supporting documents: Resolution Prepared by: Beth Holida, office assistant Reviewed by: Stacy M. Voelker, administrative coordinator Emily Carr, assessing technician Austin Holm, utilities superintendent Jay Hall, public works director Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5k) Page 2 Title: Resolution approving special assessment for sewer service line repair at 3920 Lynn Avenue South - Ward 2 Resolution No. 26-___ Authorizing the special assessment for the repair of the sewer service line at 3920 Lynn Avenue South, St. Louis Park, MN P.I.D. 07-028-24-12-0107 Whereas, the property owners at 3920 Lynn Avenue South, have petitioned the City of St. Louis Park to authorize a special assessment for the repair of the sewer service line for the single-family residence located at 3920 Lynn Avenue South; and Whereas, the property owners have agreed to waive the right to a public hearing, right of notice and right of appeal pursuant to Minnesota Statute, Chapter 429; and Whereas, the city council of the City of St. Louis Park has received a report from the utility superintendent related to the repair of the sewer service line, Now therefore be it resolved by the city council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, that: 1.The petition from the property owners requesting the approval and special assessment for the sewer service line repair is hereby accepted. 2.The sewer service line repair that was done in conformance with the plans and specifications approved by the public works department and department of inspections is hereby accepted. 3.The total cost for the repair of the sewer service line is accepted at $9,540.00. 4.The property owners have agreed to waive the right to a public hearing, notice and appeal from the special assessment, whether provided by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, or by other statutes, or by ordinance, City Charter, the constitution or common law. 5.The property owners have agreed to pay the city for the total cost of the above improvements through a special assessment over a ten (10) year period at the interest rate of 5.75%. 6.The property owners have executed an agreement with the city and all other documents necessary to implement the repair of the sewer service line and the special assessment of all costs associated therewith. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council July 6, 2026: Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Meeting: City council Meeting date: July 6, 2026 Consent agenda item: 5l Executive summary Title: Resolutions supporting DEED redevelopment grant application for Creekline Flats - Ward 3 Recommended action: •Motion to adopt a resolution authorizing the application for a Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) redevelopment grant to support the Creekline Flats development. •Motion to adopt resolution accepting a Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) redevelopment grant to support the Creekline Flats development, upon award. Policy consideration: Does city council want to authorize an application for, and upon award, acceptance of the grant award to support the Creekline Flats development? Summary: If awarded, grant funds from DEED will be used to support eligible expenses associated with the Creekline Flats development located at the current address of 8800 Highway 7, a 208-unit affordable housing development proposed by Broadway Street Development. Staff will apply for approximately $1 million in grant funds. This request is before the council because if awarded, the dollar amount accepted may be above the statutory authority of the city manager. Broadway Street Development, a local affordable housing developer based in St. Paul, Minnesota, has a purchase agreement for the former Bremer Bank office building at 8800 State Highway 7. The redeveloper proposes to demolish the existing building and parking lot and construct a seven-story, 208-unit all-affordable apartment building. The developer has submitted a financial assistance application to the city, which is currently under review. The developer is seeking tax exempt bonds and low-income housing tax credits (LIHTC) from the state and is working to finalize the unit mix and site plan. The developer’s financial assistance application will be considered at a future Economic Development Authority meeting. Financial or budget considerations: Any grant funding received will assist with the project financial feasibility and may offset the amount of city financial assistance requested for the project. A 50% match is required, which will be provided by the developer and not by the city. Finance staff have reviewed this flow-through grant request and have no concerns. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a range of quality, affordable and attainable housing options. Supporting documents: Resolutions Prepared by: Dean Porter-Nelson, redevelopment administrator Reviewed by: Jennifer Monson, economic development manager Karen Barton, community development director & EDA executive director; Tiffany Stephens, interim deputy financial director/financial analyst Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager Page 2 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5l) Title: Resolutions supporting DEED redevelopment grant application for Creekline Flats - Ward 3 Resolution No. 26-__ Authorizing a grant application for Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development redevelopment grant for the Creekline Flats development Be it resolved that the City of St. Louis Park approved the redevelopment grant application submitted by the City of St. Louis Park to the Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) on or before July 31, 2026, for the Creekline Flats development site. Reviewed for administration:      Adopted by the city council July 6, 2026:                              Kim Keller, city manager      Nadia Mohamed, mayor             Attest:                                     Melissa Kennedy, city clerk         Page 3 City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5l) Title: Resolutions supporting DEED redevelopment grant application for Creekline Flats - Ward 3 Resolution No. 26-__ Committing local match provided by the developer and authorizing contract signature for the grant application for the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development Redevelopment grant for the Creekline Flats development project Whereas, the City of St. Louis Park desires to apply for, and upon grant application acceptance, enter into an agreement with DEED to support the Creekline Flats development project located at 8800 Hwy 7, St. Louis Park; and Whereas, the City of St. Louis Park acts as the legal sponsor for project(s) contained in the Redevelopment Grant Program application to be submitted by July 31, 2026, and the city manager is hereby authorized to apply to the Department of Employment and Economic Development for funding of this project on behalf of the City of St. Louis Park; and Whereas, the City of St. Louis Park has the legal authority to apply for financial assistance, and the institutional, managerial and financial capability to ensure adequate project administration; and Whereas, the sources and amounts of the local match identified in the application are committed to the project identified; and Whereas, if the project identified in the application fails to substantially provide the public benefits listed in the application within five years from the date of the grant award, the City of St. Louis Park may be required to repay 100 percent of the awarded grant per Minn. Stat. § 116J.575, Subd. 4; and Whereas, the City of St. Louis Park has not violated any federal, state, or local laws pertaining to fraud, bribery, graft, kickbacks, collusion, conflict of interest or other unlawful or corrupt practice; and Whereas, upon approval of its application by the state, the City of St. Louis Park may enter into an agreement with the State of Minnesota for the above-referenced project(s), and that the City of St. Louis Park certifies it will comply with all applicable laws and regulation as stated in all contract agreements, Now therefore be it resolved that the mayor, city manager, or successors, are hereby authorized to execute such agreements and amendments as are necessary to implement the project on behalf of the City of St. Louis Park. Reviewed for administration:      Adopted by the city council July 6, 2026:                     Kim Keller, city manager      Nadia Mohamed, mayor             Attest:                   Melissa Kennedy, city clerk         Meeting: City council Meeting date: July 6, 2026 Consent agenda item: 5m Executive summary Title: Resolution of support for Sentinel Management Company’s application for a Hennepin County ERF grant for the Wooddale Station redevelopment project – Ward 2 Recommended action: Motion to adopt a resolution supporting Sentinel Management Company in their application for a grant from the Hennepin County Environmental Response Fund (ERF) to support the Wooddale Station Redevelopment project. Policy consideration: Does the city council support Sentinel Management Company’s application for a Hennepin County ERF cleanup grant for the Wooddale Station redevelopment? Summary: The St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority (EDA) entered into a preliminary development agreement with Sentinel Management Company on March 2, 2026, to redevelop the Wooddale Station redevelopment site, which includes a city-owned parcel at 5950 36th Street West. The proposed redevelopment includes a new mixed-use building with approximately 265 apartments, including approximately 58 affordable units and approximately 7,000 square feet of commercial space. If awarded, the ERF grant will support environmental cleanup and construction costs at the Wooddale Station redevelopment site. The EDA previously authorized an application by the EDA to the ERF on April 6, 2026. Sentinel Management Company opted to directly apply to the ERF program at their discretion. This resolution supports their direct application for, and potential acceptance, of the funds at the request of the developer. Financial or budget considerations: Any grant funding received will assist with the project financial feasibility and may offset the amount of city financial assistance needed for the project. Adopting the resolution does not obligate the EDA or city to enter into a development agreement with or provide financial assistance to the developer. Finance staff have reviewed this flow through grant request and do not have concerns. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of housing and neighborhood oriented development. Supporting documents: Resolution Prepared by: Dean Porter-Nelson, redevelopment administrator Reviewed by: Jennifer Monson, planning and economic development manager Karen Barton, community development director/EDA executive director Tiffany Stephens, interim deputy finance director/financial analyst Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager City council meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 5m) Page 2 Title: Resolution of support for Sentinel Management Company’s application for a Hennepin County ERF grant for the Wooddale Station redevelopment project – Ward 2 Resolution No. 26-___ Authorizing application for the Hennepin County ERF grant on behalf of the Wooddale Station redevelopment project Whereas, Sentinel Management Company (“developer”) is eligible to make application for grant funds from the Hennepin County Environmental Response Fund (ERF); and Whereas, the grant funds will be used for the Wooddale Station redevelopment project in the City of St. Louis Park; and Whereas, the developer has the institutional, managerial, and financial capability to ensure adequate project administration; and Whereas, upon approval of its application, the developer may enter into an agreement with Hennepin County for the above referenced project, Now therefore be it resolved that the mayor and city manager hereby support and approve Sentinel Management Company’s prior application for a Hennepin County Environmental Response Fund grant as submitted to the Hennepin County Environment and Energy Department on May 1, 2026, by Sentinel Management Company, to support the Wooddale Station redevelopment in St. Louis Park, and authorize Sentinel Management Company to accept grant funds if awarded. Reviewed for administration: ____________________________________ Kim Keller, city manager Attest: ____________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Adopted by the city council July 6, 2026: ____________________________________ Nadia Mohamed, mayor Meeting: City council Meeting date: July 6, 2026 Consent agenda item: 5n Executive summary Title: Approve quote to supply lighting materials for a replacement project at Keller Baseball Field in Dakota Park - Ward 1 Recommended action: Motion to authorize execution of a contract with Musco Lighting in the amount of $185,000 for the purchase of lighting materials to be replaced at Keller Baseball Field in Dakota Park, Project No. 21261801. Policy consideration: Does the city council want to proceed with the purchase of lighting materials for replacement at Keller Baseball Field in Dakota Park? Summary: The lights at Keller Baseball Field in Dakota Park are 32 years old and scheduled to be replaced in the 2026 capital improvement plan. A quote for replacement lighting materials was received in the amount of $185,000. The replacement will be purchased via the State of Minnesota cooperative purchasing venture with Musco Lighting. Musco Lighting is a reputable contractor that has completed similar projects in the past. Staff recommend that a contract be awarded to the firm in the amount of $185,000. Keller Field is the home field for St. Louis Park High School’s baseball team, the St. Louis Park Legion and VFW teams. Financial or budget considerations: This project is included in the Park Improvement Fund Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for 2026. The budgeted cost of replacement lights was $345,000 and the bid received was $185,000. There will be additional costs incurred for installation. This project is expected to come in under budget. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing safe, reliable and well- maintained infrastructure and neighborhoods that connect people and places with an emphasis on walking, biking and transit. Supporting documents: None. Prepared by: Stacy M. Voelker, administrative coordinator Reviewed by: Larry Umphrey, parks superintendent Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager Meeting: City council Meeting date: July 6, 2026 Public hearing: 6a Executive summary Title: Public hearing for new liquor license - Best of India Inc dba Best of India Recommended action: •Mayor to open public hearing, take public testimony, and close public hearing. •Motion to approve application from Best of India Inc dba Best of India for on-sale 3.2% and on-sale wine liquor licenses. Policy consideration: Does the applicant meet the requirements for issuance of on-sale 3.2% and on-sale wine liquor licenses? Summary: The city received an application from Best of India Inc dba Best of India for on-sale 3.2% and on-sale wine liquor licenses for the premises located at 8120 Minnetonka Boulevard. The premises consists of approximately 1,726 square feet of indoor-only seating with a capacity of 45. The owners are Ramesh Sheregar and Autul Mondal; Mr. Mondal will serve as the designated store manager. The application meets the requirements of the zoning and building divisions. The police department conducted a background investigation, and nothing was discovered that would warrant denial of the license. The application and police report are on file in the city clerk’s office. The required notice of the public hearing was published June 25, 2026. If approved, the license will not be issued until all requirements have been met with the city, Hennepin County and the State Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division. Financial or budget considerations: Fees for this applicant are $500 for the police background check and $1,833.34 for the prorated on-sale 3.2% and wine license effective July 2026. Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: None. Prepared by: Amanda Scott-Lerdal, deputy city clerk Reviewed by: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager Meeting: Special study session Meeting date: July 6, 2026 Discussion item: 1 Executive summary Title: St. Louis Park school district community engagement regarding referendum Recommended action: None at this time. Leadership from the school district will be in attendance to share information with the council regarding the St. Louis Park Public School District referendum. Policy consideration: None at this time. Summary: This discussion provides a comprehensive overview of the school district referendum. Voters will be asked to consider one question for the school district. If the referendum passes, the funds would replace boilers and related systems at St. Louis Park Middle School and St. Louis Park High School and provide ongoing funding for building systems, technology and safety needs. The proposal combines a one-time bond for building improvements with a capital projects levy that provides ongoing funding. Financial or budget considerations: None at this time. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to being an inclusive, equitable and vibrant city where everyone feels safe and experiences a strong sense of belonging. Supporting documents: Referendum Handout, Example Ballot, Ehlers Public Finance Advisors Tax Calculator for ISD No. 283 St. Louis Park School District, St. Louis Park Public Schools Referendum Website Prepared by: Amanda Scott-Lerdal, deputy city clerk Reviewed by: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager PROUD PAST PREPARED FUTURE WHAT YOU’LL LEARN LEARN MORE ABOUT THE 2026 REFERENDUM COMMUNITY INFORMATION SESSIONS • • • • • • At each session, community members can learn about: What is included in the ballot question Why the proposal is being considered now Estimated tax impact How funding would be used How to ask questions and find more information Learn more: slpschools.org/referendum On AuJ. 11, 2026, YoWers Ln SW. LouLs ParN PuEOLF SFhooOs ZLOO FonsLder one EaOOoW TuesWLon WhaW LnFOudes WZo parWs: s A proposed 50 mLOOLon Eond Ior building improvements • A proposed capital projects levy to support ongoing technology, safety and building system needs If approved, the proposal would support the replacement of aging systems at St. Louis Park Middle School and St. Louis Park High School and provide ongoing funding for systems used in day-to-day school operations across the District. Thursday, May 14 | 5–6 p.m. St. Louis Park High School Cafeteria Monday, May 18 | 7–8 p.m. Aquila Elementary Cafeteria Thursday, May 21 |6–7 p.m. Peter Hobart Elementary Cafeteria Monday, June 1 | 4–5 p.m. Susan Lindgren Elementary Cafeteria Thursday, June 4 | 7:30–8:30 a.m. Park Spanish Immersion Media Center Wednesday, June 10 | 12–1 p.m. Lenox Community Center Thursday, June 18 | 8–9 a.m. St. Louis Park Middle School Performing Arts Center SƉĞĐŝĂů Ɛtudy session meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 1) Title: St. Louis Park school district community engagement regarding referendum Page 2 and support WHAT’S ON THE BALLOT? Voters will consider one ballot question that includes two parts: Learn more: slpschools.org/referendum ONE QUESTION. TWO PARTS. WHY NOW? The boiler and related building systems at the middle school and high school are original to the buildings and require significant ongoing maintenance and repairs. Projects such as boiler and system replacement would still need to be completed over time, regardless of the outcome of the referendum. If the proposal is not approved, these costs would need to be paid from the District’s general fund, which supports day-to-day school operations. This may require adjustments to other budget priorities over time. ESTIMATED TAX IMPACT For a home valued at approximately $400,000 Use the tax impact calculator on the District website for additional property value estimates. By voting “Yes” on this ballot question, you are voting for a property tax increase. PART 1 The proposal includes a $50 million bond to replace aging boiler infrastructure and related building systems at St. Louis Park Middle School and St. Louis Park High School. These systems are original to the buildings and are approximately 70 years old. They require significant ongoing maintenance and repairs and are beyond a typical lifespan. Funding would support deferred maintenance projects and related capital improvements connected to heating and building operations. Building Improvements (Bond) PART 2 The proposal also includes a 1year capital projects levy expected to raise approximately . million annually. Proposed uses include: Cameras, alarms and security systems ReNeying doors districtZide Updated door hardZare to support secure locNing Updates to phone and communication systems Enhanced visitor management tools Technology systems, equipment and support School Operations, Technology, and Safety (Capital Projects Levy) SƉĞĐŝĂů Ɛtudy session meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 1) Title: St. Louis Park school district community engagement regarding referendum Page 3 Special Election Ballot School District Ballot Independent School District No. 283 (St. Louis Park Public Schools), Minnesota August 11, 2026 ___________________________________________________________________________ Instructions to Voters To vote, completely fill in the oval(s) next to your choice(s) like this: To vote for a question, fill in the oval next to the word "Yes" for that question. To vote against a question, fill in the oval next to the word "No" for that question. School District Question School Building Bonds; Technology Capital Project Levy Revoke and Replace The board of Independent School District No. 283 (St. Louis Park Public Schools), Minnesota has proposed to issue general obligation school building bonds in an amount not to exceed $50,000,000 to provide funds for the acquisition and betterment of school sites and facilities including, but not limited to, deferred capital maintenance projects and related capital improvements at various District facilities. The board of Independent School District No. 283 (St. Louis Park Public Schools), Minnesota has also proposed to revoke its existing capital project levy authorization of 4.287% times the net tax capacity of the school district and to replace that authorization with a new authorization in the maximum amount of 10.127% times the net tax capacity of the school district. The proposed new authorization will raise approximately $9,860,228 for taxes first levied in 2026, payable in 2027, and will be authorized for ten (10) years. The estimated total cost of the projects to be funded over that time period is approximately $98,602,280. The proposed authorization will provide funds for security equipment, technology related personnel and training, and acquisition, installation, support and maintenance of software, technology, technology systems and infrastructure. YES NO Shall the issuance of the general obligation school building bonds, revocation of the existing capital project levy authorization, and the new capital project levy authorization to proposed by the board of Independent School District No. 283 (St. Louis Park Public Schools), Minnesota be approved? BY VOTING “YES” ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE Special study session meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 1) Title: St. Louis Park school district community engagement regarding referendum Page 4 (Reverse side of ballot) OFFICIAL BALLOT August 11, 2026 _________________________________ Judge _________________________________ Judge (The ballot is to be initialed by two judges) Special study session meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 1) Title: St. Louis Park school district community engagement regarding referendum Page 5 Meeting: Special study session Meeting date: July 6, 2026 Discussion item: 2 Executive summary Title: 2026 Legislative Session Wrap Up Recommended action: None. Policy consideration: None. This is an opportunity for the city council to hear from Momentum Advocacy. Summary: May 18, 2026 the 94th legislative session officially adjourned. St. Louis Park was included in the bonding bill for $5.1 million for the Oxford and Louisiana Area Infrastructure Investments project. During the 2026 session the city worked with Momentum Advocacy to represent city interests at both state and federal levels. Members of Momentum Advocacy are here this evening to speak about the impacts on the city resulting from new legislation. Financial or budget considerations: N/A Strategic priority consideration: The legislative positions directly align with all five of the strategic priorities by design. Supporting documents: 2026 legislative positions and priorities 2026 end of session summary Prepared by: Clancy Ferris, legislative & grants analyst Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager Page 2 Special study session meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 2) Title: 2026 Legislative Session Wrap Up Discussion Background: State Legislative overview: The 94th Minnesota Legislature (2025-2026) adjourned sine die (concluded indefinitely, without setting a date to reconvene) on May 18, 2026. The 2024 elections resulted in a tied Minnesota House (67-67) and a one-seat Democratic-Farmer-Labor (DFL) majority (34-33) in the Minnesota Senate. These historically thin margins, coupled with 2026 being an election year, led to many priorities not advancing. The legislature will look very different in 2027. All 134 seats in the House, all 67 seats in the Senate and the five statewide constitutional offices: Governor, Lieutenant Governor, Auditor, Secretary of State and Attorney General, are all on the ballot. As of today, there are 42 announced retirements, seven House members running for a Senate seat, and ten current members running for other higher offices. Federal overview: 117th Congress: The 2024 election results gave Republicans a narrow majority in both the US House and Senate. With control of the White House, this means that the Republican party has a trifecta across the US Executive and Legislative branch. The narrow majority in both chambers are as follows: the House has 217 Republicans and 212 Democrats, while the Senate has 53 Republicans and 47 Democrats. In 2025, during the start of the 117th Congress, Republican members passed a major reconciliation bill: The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (HR1). HR1 was passed with a simple majority and established funding for Department of Homeland Security, cuts to Medicaid and increased tax credits. In 2026, we are beginning to see the implementation of this bill trickle down to state and local governments. Funding Opportunities: St. Louis Park has continued to take advantage of federal funding opportunities and has been a leader in advocacy efforts around immigration enforcement in Minnesota. This legislative session began with a 75-day shutdown of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) from February to April 2026. The shutdown mainly impacted Transportation Security Administration (TSA) employees and airport operations but had no significant direct impacts to cities. During the fiscal year 2026 appropriations season, St. Louis Park applied for the Congressionally Directed Spending (CDS) program with US Representative Omar’s office for the Oxford and Louisiana Area Infrastructure Investments project and received $250,000, which was confirmed this year when Congress passed continuing resolution funding for the fiscal year budget. This year, for fiscal year 2027, the city applied for additional funding for the Oxford and Louisiana Area Infrastructure Investments project and funding for the Minnetonka Boulevard project through the CDS process. The Minnetonka Boulevard project was advanced by US Representative Omar and US Senator Klobuchar’s offices for funding consideration. The results of this application are still pending. Page 3 Special study session meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 2) Title: 2026 Legislative Session Wrap Up St. Louis Park also applied for a BUILD grant through the Department of Transportation to support the Oxford and Louisiana Area Infrastructure Investments project. All of the Congressional offices submitted letters of support for this application. Advocacy & Operation Metro Surge: Although Mayor Mohamed, council members and city staff were not able to visit Washington, D.C. this year, the team met with Minnesota staff from the offices of US Representative Omar, US Senator Smith and US Senator Klobuchar to discuss their CDS projects and the impacts of Operation Metro Surge on the city. The conversation with each office focused on the direct impacts to the City of St. Louis Park’s operations and staff, as well as impacts on local businesses, employee challenges and resident housing security concerns. There were a handful of laws passed this session that will impact the City of St. Louis Park and that were identified as city legislative priorities and positions. These include changes to group home licensing and registration, one-time property tax rebates and state funding of essential resident services. These changes, as well as bills of interest to the city that did not become law, are highlighted in the table below. Note that this table is not meant to provide a full view of all the laws passed this year but rather feature those that have been recognized as high priority for both staff and council. The city’s state bonding priorities included: 1.Oxford & Louisiana area infrastructure investment: this project will repair existing infrastructure, remove barriers to active transportation and transit, and promote environmental sustainability and climate preparedness. a.Awarded $5.1 million in state bonding b.Awaiting decision on Metropolitan Council regional solicitation grant application 2.Wayzata-Zarthan-16th corridor project: this project will repair existing infrastructure, remove barriers to access active transportation, transit, affordable housing, commercial and job centers. The city’s federal bonding priorities included: 1.Oxford & Louisiana area infrastructure investment: this project will repair existing infrastructure, remove barriers to active transportation and transit, and promote environmental sustainability and climate preparedness. a.Awarded $250,000 through fiscal year 2026 Congressionally Directed Spending (CDS) b.Awaiting decision on Federal BUILD grant application 2.Minnetonka Blvd Reconstruction phase 2: a.Recommended to receive $2 million through fiscal year 2027 Congressionally Directed Spending (CDS) 2026 city legislative priorities 2026 passed legislation Next steps Assessing services Support a legislative proposal that provides cities which offer their own assessing services the ability to either 1) recoup assessment costs from the county, for the work performed by those cities or 2) not be levied by the county for those specific services None. Continue to support and seek opportunities to collaborate with impacted cities. Emergency medical services Support a solution for EMS services that balances the needs of residents and providers statewide. Support allowing local units of government to designate which licensed provider may serve their communities and to determine the appropriate level of service. Current regulations do not require ambulance services to disclose important data points that would ensure a community is receiving quality services. None. Continue to support. Group home licensing and registration Support a repeal of the legislation passed in 2024 that prohibited all cities from subjecting state licensed group assisted living facilities licensed under Minn. Stat. § 144G and Minn. Stat. § 245D.02 with six or fewer residents from any city-imposed life safety rental licensing requirements. The Legislature should recognize the importance of city rental licensing requirements that ensure minimum life safety standards and hold providers accountable and protect residents. Chapter 121 Human Services Finance & Policy Bill has several new requirements for the Department regarding these licensed facilities: 1) Notification to affected municipality 2) allowing the Commissioner to delegate inspection responsibilities to the local unit government 3) Prohibiting the Commissioner to approve the colocation (adjoining property) of certain home and community-based residential settings 4) Interagency agreements with Department of Health and Human Services. Commissioners must execute an interagency agreement that requires the commissioner of human services to Need more information of how these new requirements are to be implemented and when. (i.e., need to find out how we can get the Commissioner to delegate the inspection responsibility to St. Louis Park for group homes in our city.) Page 4 Special study session meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 2) Title: 2026 Legislative Session Wrap Up Page 5 2026 city legislative priorities 2026 passed legislation Next steps determine on behalf of the commissioner of health whether the proposed location of an assisted living facility meets the heighted HCBS setting standards of 245A.042 Housing policy Support legislation that expands housing opportunities (“missing middle” housing) across the state that helps to ensure all communities are planning for and able to accommodate a variety of housing types by supporting policies that allow local leadership on zoning and land use changes that are sensitive to individual community needs and housing goals including incentive-based approaches and options that can be tailored to each individual community and oppose policies that seek to impose one-size-fits-all rigid zoning and land use framework on cities. None. Continue to support. Housing TIF district modifications Support expanding authority for all cities to transfer unobligated pooled increment from a housing or redevelopment TIF district to support a local housing trust fund for any eligible expenditure under Minn. Stat. § 462C.16 and modify the housing district income qualification level requirements to allow the levels to vary according to individual communities to support deeply affordable units. None. Continue to collaborate with other impacted cities. Light rail and public safety Support legislation allocating funding to local jurisdictions for staffing and equipment to support public safety measures related to the light rail. None. Continue to support while working to find alternative funding models. Minnesota Paid Leave Support legislation that would: None. Continue to support. Special study session meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 2) Title: 2026 Legislative Session Wrap Up Page 6 2026 city legislative priorities 2026 passed legislation Next steps a) With respect to ESST, amend Minn. Stat. § 181.9445, subd. 5 to incorporate a well-defined “public employee” definition, not to include unique positions in which there is not a formal employer- employee relationship such as paid appointed advisory, committee, or commission members, election judges or other nontraditional positions. b) Minimize legal mandates to incentivize employers to establish and/or continue to provide more generous paid leave benefits to employees. Specifically, eliminate the expansion of mandated benefits to paid leave previously negotiated in good faith and/or adopted in personnel policies in excess of what is legally required. c) Provide funding that pays the full costs of any mandated employment-related expenditures. d) Avoid and eliminate expensive and time-consuming duplicative legal protections and processes for public employees, including those that preclude promotional probationary periods. e) Eliminate contradictory existing laws regarding public employment. Special study session meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 2) Title: 2026 Legislative Session Wrap Up Page 7 Special study session meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 2) Title: 2026 Legislative Session Wrap Up 2026 city legislative positions 2026 passed legislation Next steps Adult Use Cannabis Support a regulatory framework that maintains or expands local control and removing the fee-cap for local service. Also support solutions to protecting the Minnesota hemp-derived cannabinoid industry after federal changes implemented a cap on THC levels. Restrictions must be set by ordinance. City authority over time, place, and manner rules (including buffers like 1,000 ft from a school) is unchanged, it just has to be by ordinance now. Zoning sign-off is now a 30-day deadline. The city can certify an applicant fails local zoning or state codes, forcing denial, but miss the 30-day window and the state can license anyway. Retail cap math changed slightly. The one-per- 12,500-residents cap now includes the new "macrobusiness" license and rounds up after each increment. For St. Louis Park at about 50,000 residents, this could nudge the floor from four to five. Update the registration-cap language to reference macrobusinesses-with-retail- endorsement and the round- up rule and tighten internal workflow so the 30-day zoning certification deadline never lapses by accident. Property tax rebate program revisions Support providing additional direct property tax relief through an expansion of the Homestead Credit Refund program, the renter’s income tax credit, the targeting program or other programs that provide property tax relief directly from the state to taxpayers. One-time 12% increase to homestead property tax refunds. None. State funding of essential resident services Support state funding of essential residential services to lessen or mitigate the impacts of federal policies $4.9 million one-time appropriation to Regional Food Bank grants; $5 million one-time appropriation to MN Food Shelf Program. $40M for Family Homelessness Prevent and Assistance Program (FHPAP), can be used for rental or mortgage assistance. Continue to support and seek funding through both city lobbying and participation in the Cities for Safe and Stable Communities coalition. Present considerations: Not applicable. Next steps: Staff continue to research additional positions and priorities as they emerge throughout the year. Priorities that were identified last year will be analyzed and considered for inclusion in the city’s 2027 legislative priorities. Tentative 2027 legislative session timeline: •Nov. 16, 2026 – staff presents draft 2027 legislative positions to council along with recommended priorities. City council confirms final 2027 positions and priorities. •Dec. 7, 2026 – council hosts delegation members to share 2027 legislative positions •Jan. 12, 2027 – legislative session begins •May 17, 2027 – legislative session ends Page 8 Special study session meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 2) Title: 2026 Legislative Session Wrap Up Meeting: Special study session Meeting date: July 6, 2026 Written report: 3 Executive summary Title: Good Governance system kick-off Recommended action: None at this time. Policy consideration: None at this time. Each item will include necessary information for council to consider. Summary: This report will outline the framework for the good governance system. While staff has consistently advanced this work, Good Governance is a new strategic priority for the city and, therefore, is an official “study session system.” It is part of the Vision 4.0 strategic priority guiding St. Louis park’s identity as “a city that delivers reliable services, uses city resources responsibly, operates transparently and builds strong relationships with residents.” This annual system begins in July and concludes in December. Because it concludes the end of the budget cycle, this system will run congruent with multiple additional systems. The topics included in this system are: a resolution amending change order policy, 2026 legislative session wrap-up, a memorandum of understanding for union contract changes, Hennepin County Library land transfer, an elections update, an emergency management table top exercise, transfer of a LAWCON grant restrictions, a report on the 2027 grants the city has applied for, an update on the 2026 school district referendum, a review of the 2025 annual comprehensive financial report (audit), adopting 2027 fees, 2027 base and operating discussions, utility fee discussion, capital improvement projects (CIP) discussions, 2027 preliminary levy approval, the Truth in Taxation public hearing, and ending in the final 2027 budget and levy adoption. Financial or budget considerations: None at this time. All reports will include information about how decisions will affect the levy. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to being a city that delivers reliable services, uses city resources responsibly, operates transparently and builds strong relationships with residents. Supporting documents: Discussion Prepared by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager Reviewed by: Cheyenne Brodeen, administrative services director Approved by: Kim Keller, city manger Special study session meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 3) Page 2 Title: Good Governance system kick-off Discussion Background: Following a year of deep engagement and community input through the Vision 4.0 initiative, the council officially adopted a new set of strategic priorities in April 2026. These new priorities were directly shaped by feedback from approximately 1,600 residents. Good Governance is a new addition to the city’s slate of strategic priorities. During the planning process to determine updated strategic priorities from the Vision 4.0 initiative, the council deliberately chose to elevate good governance as a standalone priority. By formalizing Good Governance as a part of the Vision 4.0 in the strategic priority guiding St. Louis park’s identity as “a city that delivers reliable services, uses city resources responsibly, operates transparently, and builds strong relationships with residents,” the city is establishing clear expectations of ensuring that city operations remain accountable, fiscally sound and that both staff and the community are supported and engaged. Present considerations: This series of written reports, consent items and study session discussions will focus on providing information to council regarding our new strategic priority of good governance. Emergency management tabletop exercise: June 15, 2026 Consultants Bob McNaney and Greg Hayes facilitated a discussion with the city council, staff and attorney regarding elected officials’ role in citywide or local emergencies. Staff from the departments of police, fire, communications and administrative services assisted as the exercise concerned city facilities, systems, procedures, services and infrastructure related to the management of emergencies. Transfer of LAWCON grant restrictions: June 15, 2026 Staff sought council direction on an opportunity to transfer a portion of the federal LAWCON restrictions currently associated with property on the far eastern corner of Westwood Hills Nature Center to land the city intends to acquire from MnDOT for the future expansion of Webster Park. Administrative housekeeping items: • Resolution amending change order This resolution will establish the authority for the city manager to administratively approve change orders for amounts under the threshold at which competitive bids are required by state law. • Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for union contract changes This resolution will allow staff to update language in union contracts by way of an MOU during the life of the contract. 2026 Legislative wrap up In July 2026, Momentum Advocacy will present a summary of the 2026 legislative session. The summary will include background on the state of the legislature, an update on how the city’s 2026 legislative priorities and positions were impacted by legislative actions, and next steps for Special study session meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 3) Page 3 Title: Good Governance system kick-off the city to complete in response to passed legislation. In November 2026, Momentum Advocacy will return to the council to assist in prioritizing the 2027 legislative priorities. Finally, in December 2026, council will meet with the St. Louis Park delegation to share legislative priorities; Momentum Advocacy will be available to support. Hennepin County Library land transfer Staff will present at a study session to provide an overview and seek policy guidance regarding the ownership of the Hennepin County Library in St. Louis Park. While the city originally acquired the land in 1941, records from the 1960’s indicate an agreement to sell the property to Hennepin County for $190,405.17. However, recent reviews confirm that the city still holds the legal title, and additional research by both city and county staff has concluded with no records of downpayments or additional payment transactions. Given this background and history, staff will be seeking policy guidance on how to proceed. Elections update This report provides an overview of information for the upcoming election cycle. It outlines plans for strategic voter outreach and planned services and priorities for the 2026 election cycle. Annual report on grants the city has applied for Staff will provide a report to council on grants the city has applied for between July 2025 and June 2026. The update will include the status of grants applied for, projects supported and a brief overview of grant projects. This is a new item and will be provided to the council on an annual basis during the good governance system. Update on school district referendum School district representatives will be present at a study session to provide information about the upcoming school district referendum. 2027 Operating budget, CIP, utility rates, preliminary levy approval, Truth in Taxation public hearing and final levy adoption Staff will present the 2027 budget through a series of study session discussions and reports. The city council will be provided with information to prepare for decision-making regarding annual city fees and levy. Meeting: Special study session Meeting date: July 6, 2026 Written report: 4 Executive summary Title: Disposition of public land adjacent to 2754 Xenwood Avenue South - Ward 1 Recommended action: Council is asked to review the proposed disposition, ask any questions and alert staff to any concerns with the staff recommendation to sell the property. Policy consideration: Does the city council support the sale of a parcel to the adjacent property owner of 2754 Xenwood Avenue South? Summary: The new owner of 2754 Xenwood Avenue South, Christine Glazer (buyer), approached the city about acquiring the city land that their driveway is built upon, which provides access to the garage at the back of their house. The driveway has been on city land since the house was built in 1956. The parcel is approximately 20 feet wide, 126 feet deep and 2,525 square feet in area. City staff have reviewed the city’s disposition of public land policy and find that the request meets all eligibility requirements for the city to permanently dispose of the parcel through a land sale. It is recommended the city retain a drainage and utility easement over the parcel. Financial or budget considerations: The land sale proceeds of $15,000 would be directed to the general fund for public purpose. The buyer has agreed to cover the city’s expenses ($2,000 - $2,500) related to preparing for and closing on the property in addition to the purchase price. The property would also return to the tax rolls and the new owner would maintain the parcel instead of the city. Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: Discussion Prepared by: Sean Walther, deputy community development director Reviewed by: Karen Barton, community development director; Tiffany Stephens, interim deputy finance director/financial analyst Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager Special study session meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 4) Page 2 Title: Disposition of public land adjacent to 2754 Xenwood Avenue South - Ward 1 Discussion Background: The new owner of 2754 Xenwood Avenue South, Christine Glazer, approached the city about acquiring the city land that their driveway is built upon, which provides access to the garage at the back of their house. The driveway has been on city land since the house was built in 1956. At the time, the land was public right-of-way with no road built on it. Site location map History: • The city acquired the parcel for $1 in 1954 to widen the West 28th Street right-of-way. • The city vacated 20 feet of right-of-way between Xenwood Avenue South and Yosemite Avenue South in 1962. • Soon after the vacation, the 20-foot wide parcel adjacent to the property at 2754 Xenwood Avenue South and containing the neighbor’s driveway went tax forfeit. • In 1965, the state conveyed the land to the City of St. Louis Park for road and utility purposes. • In 1995, the restrictions of that state transfer lapsed and the city has fee title to the parcel without use restrictions. The new owner of 2754 Xenwood Avenue South would like to obtain the parcel from the city. They are concerned that not owning the land under their driveway will cloud the title of their property when seeking to refinance or sell the property in the future. The city has storm sewer on and near the parcel, and a public trail and underground fiber optic in the remaining right-of-way south of the parcel. The city has a disposition of public land policy adopted by city council Resolution No. 097-30. The policy provides guidance to city staff for evaluating such requests. Special study session meeting of July 6, 2026 (Item No. 4) Page 3 Title: Disposition of public land adjacent to 2754 Xenwood Avenue South - Ward 1 The Home Rule Charter of the City of St. Louis Park, Section 11.01. Sale of real property, states: “No real property of the city shall be sold or disposed of except by ordinance or resolution. The proceeds of any such sale shall be used as far as possible to retire any outstanding indebtedness incurred by the city in the purchase, construction or improvement of this or other property used for the same public purpose. If there is no such outstanding indebtedness, the council may, by a resolution adopted by an affirmative vote of at least five (5) members of the council, designate some other public use for such proceeds.” There is no debt service related to the city’s real property. The city is in contact with Hennepin County to determine if there are any outstanding obligations to the county that would need to be settled. Any remaining land sale proceeds would be directed to the general fund for another public purpose as part of the annual budgeting process. Present considerations: City staff reviewed the city’s disposition of public land policy and found that the request meets all eligibility requirements for the city to permanently dispose of the parcel through a land sale. Staff recommends recording a drainage and utility easement over the entire parcel and selling the land to the neighboring property owner. Because the land will be fully encumbered with an easement, we worked with the city assessor to arrive at a negotiated and recommended sale price of $15,000 for the land. The buyer has agreed to pay for all the city’s incurred legal fees and closing costs (estimated to range between $2,000 and $2,500). Upon closing, the buyer would go through Hennepin County’s administrative process to combine the parcel with their property at 2754 Xenwood Avenue South into one tax parcel. This should reduce the risk of another tax forfeiture in the future as well as being more convenient for the buyer. Next steps: After resolving the question of any outstanding financial obligations to Hennepin County if the land is sold, staff intend to bring this to the city council as early as July 20, 2026, for authorization via resolution to sell the property to the neighboring owner.