HomeMy WebLinkAbout2026/03/02 - ADMIN - Agenda Packets - City Council - RegularAGENDA
MARCH 2, 2026
6:00 p.m. Economic Development Authority meeting – Council Chambers
Recess (at approximately 6:02 p.m.) – The EDA will take a short recess so that those who observe Ramadan
may break their fast.
1. Call to order.
2. Approve agenda.
3. Minutes.
a.EDA meeting minutes of February 17, 2026
4. Consent items.
a.Approve EDA disbursements
b.Resolution approving preliminary development agreement with Sentinel Management Company
for redevelopment of the Wooddale Station site - Ward 2
c.Resolution approving collateral assignment and subordination agreement related to the Terasa
redevelopment - Ward 4
5. Public hearings – none.
6. Regular business – none.
7. Communications and announcements – none.
8. Adjournment.
6:15 p.m. City council meeting – Council Chambers
1. Call to order.
a.Roll call.
b.Pledge of Allegiance.
2. Approve agenda.
3.Presentations.
a.Proclamation observing National Womens' History Month
b.Proclamation observing World Lymphedema Day
4. Minutes – none.
5. Consent items.
a.Approve city disbursements
b.Adopt ordinance amending St. Louis Park city code chapter 2 regarding boards and commissions
c.Approve Human Rights Commissions and Community Technology Advisory Commission workplan
additions
Agenda EDA, city council meetings and closed executive session of March 2, 2026
d.Approve amendment to 2026 social services award for St. Louis Park Emergency Program (STEP)
e.Resolution approving preliminary development agreement with Sentinel Management Company
for redevelopment of the Wooddale Station site - Ward 2
f.Resolution approving collateral assignment and subordination agreement related to the Terasa
redevelopment - Ward 4
g.Resolution authorizing final payment for the 2025 Pavement Management Project (4025-1000) -
Ward 4
h.Resolution to prioritize federal congressionally directed spending requests
6. Public hearings – none.
7. Regular business – none.
Closed Executive Session – pursuant to M.S. 13D.05, subd. 3 - Westwood Room, City Hall
Discussion item
1. City manager annual performance evaluation
In accordance with Minnesota Open meeting law, this session is not open to the public
City council meeting reconvene – Council Chambers
8. Communications and announcements.
a.Minnetonka Boulevard twin homes project status - Ward 1
9. Adjournment.
Members of the public can attend St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority and city council meetings
in person. At regular city council meetings, members of the public may comment on any item on the agenda
by attending the meeting in-person or by submitting written comments to info@stlouisparkmn.gov by noon
the day of the meeting. Official minutes of meetings are available on the city website once approved.
Watch St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority or regular city council meetings live at
bit.ly/watchslpcouncil or at www.parktv.org, or on local cable (Comcast SD channel 14/HD channel 798).
Recordings of the meetings are available to watch on the city's YouTube channel at
www.youtube.com/@slpcable, usually within 24 hours of the meeting’s end.
City council study sessions are not broadcast.
Generally, it is not council practice to receive public comment during study sessions.
The council chambers are equipped with Hearing Loop equipment and headsets are available to borrow.
If you need special accommodations or have questions about the meeting, please call 952.924.2505.
Meeting: Economic development authority
Meeting date: March 2, 2026
Minutes: 3a
Unofficial meeting minutes
EDA meeting
St. Louis Park, Minnesota
Feb. 17, 2026
1. Call to order
President Farris called the meeting to order at 6:03 p.m.
a. Roll call.
Commissioners present: Daniel Bashore, Jim Engelking, Sue Budd, Paul Baudhuin, President
Yolanda Farris
Commissioners absent: Tim Brausen, Nadia Mohamed
Staff present: administrative services director (Ms. Brodeen), community engagement
coordinator (Mr. Coleman), finance director (Ms. Cruver), engineering director (Ms. Heiser),
City manager (Ms. Keller), police chief (Mr. Kruelle), city attorney (Mr. Mattick), deputy
engineering director (Mr. Sullivan), race, equity and inclusion director (Ms. Yang)
2. Approve agenda.
It was moved by Commissioner Bashore, seconded by Commissioner Baudhuin, to approve the
agenda as presented.
The motion passed 5-0 (Commissioners Brausen and Mohamed absent).
3. Minutes.
a. EDA meeting minutes of February 2, 2026
It was moved by Commissioner Budd, seconded by Commissioner Bashore, to approve the EDA
meeting minutes of Feb. 2, 2026, as presented.
The motion passed 5-0 (Commissioners Brausen and Mohamed absent).
4. Consent items – none.
5. Public hearings – none.
6. Regular business – none.
7. Communications and announcements – none.
8. Adjournment.
Economic development authority meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 3a) Page 2
Title: EDA meeting minutes of February 17, 2026
The EDA meeting adjourned at 6:04 p.m.
______________________________________ ______________________________________
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Yolanda Farris, president
These minutes were created with the assistance of a generative AI transcript service, then edited
and finalized by a city staff person.
Meeting: Economic development authority
Meeting date: March 2, 2026
Consent agenda item: 4a
Executive summary
Title: Approve EDA disbursements
Recommended action: Motion to approve EDA disbursement claims for the period of Jan. 27
through Feb. 23, 2026.
Policy consideration: Does the EDA approve the disbursements listed for the period ending
Feb. 23, 2026?
Summary: The finance division prepares this report monthly for the EDA to review and approve.
The attached report shows both EDA disbursements paid by physical check and those by wire
transfer or Automated Clearing House (ACH) when applicable.
Financial or budget considerations: Review and approval of disbursements by the EDA is
required and provides another layer of oversight to further ensure fiscal stewardship.
Prepared by: Estela Mulugeta, accounting specialist
Reviewed by: Amelia Cruver, finance director
Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager
CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK
Council Check Summary
2/23/20261/27/2026 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
1,060.00APEX ENGINEERING GROUP INC Development - EDA G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
1,060.00
1,362.48CENTERPOINT ENERGY EDA - 4300 36 1/2 G&A Heating Gas Utility
1,362.48
8,693.00KUTAK ROCK LLP EDA - Beltline SWLRT G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
574.00Development - EDA G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
9,267.00
283,750.00PPL UNION PARK FLATS COMMUNITY LIMITED Development - EDA G&A
283,750.00
308.13XCEL ENERGY EDA - 4300 36 1/2 G&A Electric Utility
308.13
Report Totals 295,747.61
Economic Development Authority meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approve EDA disbursements Page 2
Meeting: Economic development authority
Meeting date: March 2, 2026
Consent agenda item: 4b
Executive summary
Title: Resolution approving preliminary development agreement with Sentinel Management
Company for redevelopment of the Wooddale Station site - Ward 2
Recommended action: Motion to adopt Economic Development Authority resolution approving
the preliminary development agreement between the city, EDA and Sentinel Management
Company, LLC for the Wooddale Station redevelopment site.
Policy consideration: Does the EDA support the proposed preliminary development agreement
(PDA) with Sentinel Management Company, LLC, which formalizes the respective parties’
obligations relative to preparing a mixed-use development plan and contracts for the Wooddale
Station redevelopment site?
Summary: At the study session on Jan. 12, 2026, the city council reviewed Sentinel’s proposal
for redevelopment of the Wooddale Station site, including the city-owned 5950 36th West
property and the adjacent private property, and expressed support for a mixed-use, mixed-
income development with a public plaza fronting Wooddale Avenue and the Green Line Light
Rail Transit (LRT) station.
The city council directed staff to prepare a preliminary development agreement (PDA) with
Sentinel Management Company, LLC. The PDA would establish the parties’ intent to work
toward a mutually acceptable mixed-use development plan and a future purchase and
redevelopment contract, authorize site access for due diligence, and outline requirements
related to land use approvals and financing. The current agreement requires development of a
mixed-income project consistent with the approved concept plan, with minimum project
requirements outlined in the attached resolution.
During the term of the PDA, Sentinel Management would have exclusive rights to negotiate the
acquisition of 5950 36th Street West and would reimburse the EDA for reasonable
administrative costs associated with review of the proposed redevelopment.
The PDA would terminate if a purchase and redevelopment contract is not approved by
June 30, 2027, or earlier by mutual agreement or upon a determination that negotiations have
reached an impasse.
Financial or budget considerations: The precise purchase price of the EDA’s property, as well as
the amount of any financial assistance necessary to bring this latest Wooddale Station
redevelopment to fruition have yet to be determined.
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of
housing and neighborhood oriented development.
Supporting documents: EDA Resolution
Prepared by: Dean Porter-Nelson, redevelopment administrator
Reviewed by: Jennifer Monson, economic development manager; Karen Barton, community
development director/EDA executive director; Amelia Cruver, finance director
Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager
Page 2 Economic development authority meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 4b)
Title: Resolution approving preliminary development agreement with Sentinel Management Company for
redevelopment of the Wooddale Station site - Ward 2
EDA Resolution No. 26-________
Approving a preliminary development agreement between the City of St. Louis
Park, the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority and Sentinel
Management Company, LLC, or an affiliate, successor, or assign thereof
Whereas, pursuant to its authority under Minnesota Statutes, sections 469.090 to
469.1081 and Sections 469.001 through 469.047, both as amended, the St. Louis Park Economic
Development Authority (the “authority”) administers its Redevelopment Project No. 1 (the
“project”), for the purpose of facilitating the redevelopment of certain substandard property
within the project; and
Whereas, the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota (the “city”) owns certain property within
the project (the “city parcel”) and Sentinel Management Company, LLC, a Minnesota limited
liability company, or an affiliate, successor, or assign thereof (collectively, the “developer”),
intends to acquire certain other property adjacent to the city parcel within the project (the
“third-party parcel,” and together with the city parcel, the “development property”), all located
on the south side of the proposed Southwest LRT Wooddale Station; and
Whereas, the development property has been the subject of certain preliminary
negotiations between the parties for purposes of constructing a 5- and 6-story mixed-use,
mixed-income building with approximately 250 to 280 residential units of which at least 21% of
units would be restricted to affordable rent and income levels (including at least 10% of total
units at 50% of area median income, 10% of total units at 60% of area median income and 5
units at 30% of area median income) spread evenly throughout the building, and comparable in
size, number of bedrooms, amenities, and features, consistent with the requirements of the
city’s inclusionary housing policy; the project should include at least 4 affordable three-
bedroom units, and the project should also include approximately 7,000 to 10,000 square feet
of ground floor commercial space (which shall include two or more commercial uses including
at least one micro storefront), a public plaza, structured parking, and amenity spaces (the
“development”); and
Whereas, the authority, the city, and the developer have negotiated a preliminary
development agreement (the “agreement”), providing for the performance of certain activities on
the part of the parties in preparation for the negotiation of a definitive purchase and
redevelopment contract in connection with the development property and the development, as
presented for the authority’s consideration; and
Whereas, the board of commissioners of the authority (the “board”) has reviewed the
agreement and finds that the approval and execution of the agreement are in the best interest
of the city and its residents and will spur redevelopment of underutilized and blighted property,
encourage commerce and alternative transportation, and enhance the city’s tax base; and
Now therefore be it resolved by the board of commissioners of the St. Louis Park
Economic Development Authority as follows:
Page 3 Economic development authority meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 4b)
Title: Resolution approving preliminary development agreement with Sentinel Management Company for
redevelopment of the Wooddale Station site - Ward 2
1. The board hereby approves the agreement in substantially the form presented
to the board, together with any related documents necessary in connection therewith,
including without limitation, all documents, exhibits, certifications, or consents referenced in or
attached to the agreement (collectively, the “documents”).
2. The board hereby authorizes the president and executive director, in their
discretion and at such time, if any, as they may deem appropriate, to execute the documents
on behalf of the authority, and to carry out, on behalf of the authority, the authority’s
obligations thereunder when all conditions precedent thereto have been satisfied. The
documents shall be in substantially the form on file with the authority and the approval hereby
given to the documents includes approval of such additional details therein as may be
necessary and appropriate and such modifications thereof, deletions therefrom and additions
thereto as may be necessary and appropriate and approved by legal counsel to the authority
and by the officers authorized herein to execute said documents prior to their execution; and
said officers are hereby authorized to approve said changes on behalf of the authority. The
execution of any instrument by the appropriate officers of the authority herein authorized shall
be conclusive evidence of the approval of such document in accordance with the terms hereof.
This resolution shall not constitute an offer and the documents shall not be effective until the
date of execution thereof as provided herein.
3.In the event of absence or disability of the officers, any of the documents
authorized by this resolution to be executed may be executed without further act or
authorization of the board by any duly designated acting official, or by such other officer or
officers of the board as, in the opinion of the city attorney, may act in their behalf. Upon
execution and delivery of the documents, the officers and employees of the board are hereby
authorized and directed to take or cause to be taken such actions as may be necessary on
behalf of the board to implement the documents.
4.This resolution shall be effective upon approval.
Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the Economic Development
Authority March 2, 2026:
Karen Barton, executive director Yolanda Farris, president
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, secretary
Meeting: Economic development authority
Meeting date: March 2, 2026
Consent agenda item: 4c
Executive summary
Title: Resolution approving collateral assignment and subordination agreement related to the
Terasa redevelopment - Ward 4
Recommended action: Motion to adopt Economic Development Authority (EDA) resolution
approving a collateral assignment and subordination of contract for private development and
Tax Increment Financing (TIF) note, and subordination of city Affordable Housing Trust Fund
(AHTF) note and city AHTF mortgage, related to the Terasa redevelopment.
Policy consideration: Does the EDA approve the collateral assignment and subordination of
AHTF and TIF documents as requested by Terasa, LLC, an affiliate of Hempel, at the request of
its lender First International Bank & Trust?
Summary: On Feb. 18, 2025, the EDA entered a contract for private development for the Terasa
redevelopment which includes 222 housing units, 45 of which are affordable, and
approximately 20,000 square feet of commercial space. The contract includes provision of a TIF
note in the maximum principal amount of $5,500,000 and an AHTF loan associated with the
affordable housing units in the amount of $1,000,000.
The Terasa redevelopment recently received its building permit and is approaching a financial
closing in early March 2026. As a condition of providing financing to the development, its
lender, First International Bank & Trust, requested assignment of certain rights to the lender
and requested that other sources of financing remain subordinate to senior lender financing.
The proposed collateral assignment and subordination of the contract for private development
and TIF note, and subordination of city AHTF note and city AHTF mortgage is provided for in the
contract for private development between the EDA and the redeveloper and is similar to other
such assignments and subordinations that the EDA has previously approved for other
developments. The proposed agreement has been reviewed by the EDA’s legal counsel who
recommends its approval.
Financial or budget considerations: All legal fees associated with the preparation of collateral
assignment and subordination are to be paid by the owner, Terasa, LLC, or the lender. There
are no other budget impacts.
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of
housing and neighborhood oriented development.
Supporting documents: EDA Resolution
Prepared by: Dean Porter-Nelson, redevelopment administrator
Reviewed by: Jennifer Monson, economic development manager
Karen Barton, EDA executive director
Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager
Economic development authority meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 4c) Page 2
Title: Resolution approving collateral assignment and subordination agreement related to the Terasa
redevelopment - Ward 4
EDA Resolution No. 26-______
Approving a collateral assignment and subordination of contract for
private development and TIF note, and subordination of city AHTF
note and city AHTF mortgage
Be it resolved by the board of commissioners (the “board”) of the St. Louis Park Economic
Development Authority (the “authority”) as follows:
Section 1. Recitals; authorization.
1.01. The City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota (the “city”), the authority, and Terasa, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company (the “developer”) entered into a contract for private
Development, dated July 24, 2025 (the “development agreement”), pursuant to which the
developer agreed to construct a 220,580 to 245,099 square foot building including
approximately 222 units of multifamily rental housing and 18,601 to 20,668 square feet of retail
space (the “minimum improvements”).
1.02. To make the minimum improvements financially feasible, the authority and the
city agreed to reimburse the developer for a portion of public development costs (defined and
described in the in the development agreement). The authority agreed to issue to the
developer a taxable tax increment revenue note (Terasa apartments project) (the “TIF note”) in
the maximum principal amount of $5,515,000. The city agreed to make a loan from its
affordable housing trust fund (the “AHTF loan”) in an amount equal to the lesser of $1,000,000
or the amount of public development costs actually incurred less the amount of the TIF note to
the developer. The developer’s obligation to repay the AHTF loan is secured by a combination
mortgage, security agreement, and fixture financing statement (the “AHTF mortgage”) by the
developer in favor of the city, as evidenced by a promissory note (the “AHTF note”) by the
developer in favor of the city.
1.03. First International Bank & Trust, a North Dakota banking corporation (the
“construction lender”), has agreed to provide a construction loan (the “construction loan”) to
the developer in the principal amount of $63,750,000. As a condition to providing the
construction loan, the construction lender requires that the developer assign certain rights
under the development agreement and the TIF note to the construction lender, that certain
rights of the authority and the city under the development agreement be subordinated to the
rights of the construction lender under the loan documents evidencing and securing the
construction loan (the “construction loan documents”), and that certain rights of the city under
the AHTF mortgage and the AHTF note (together, the “AHTF loan documents”) be subordinated
to the rights of the construction lender under the construction loan documents.
1.04. There has been presented to the board a form of collateral assignment and
subordination of contract for private development and TIF note, and subordination of city AHTF
note and city AHTF mortgage (the “collateral assignment and subordination agreement”)
between the authority, the city, the developer, and the construction lender pursuant to which
the developer will assign certain rights under the development agreement and the TIF note to
the construction lender, the authority and the city will subordinate certain of their rights under
Economic development authority meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 4c) Page 3
Title: Resolution approving collateral assignment and subordination agreement related to the Terasa
redevelopment - Ward 4
the development agreement to the rights of the construction lender under the construction
loan documents, and the city will subordinate certain of its rights under the AHTF loan
documents to the rights of the construction lender under the construction loan documents.
Section 2. Approval of documents.
2.01. The board approves the collateral assignment and subordination agreement in
substantially the form presented to the board, together with any related documents necessary
in connection therewith, including without limitation all other documents, exhibits,
certifications, or consents referenced in or attached to the collateral assignment and
subordination agreement (the “documents”).
2.02. The board hereby authorizes the president and executive director, in their
discretion and at such time, if any, as they may deem appropriate, to execute the documents
on behalf of the authority, and to carry out, on behalf of the authority, the authority’s
obligations thereunder when all conditions precedent thereto have been satisfied. The
documents shall be in substantially the form on file with the authority and the approval hereby
given to the documents includes approval of such additional details therein as may be
necessary and appropriate and such modifications thereof, deletions therefrom and additions
thereto as may be necessary and appropriate and approved by legal counsel to the authority
and by the officers authorized herein to execute said documents prior to their execution; and
said officers are hereby authorized to approve said changes on behalf of the authority. The
execution of any instrument by the appropriate officers of the authority herein authorized shall
be conclusive evidence of the approval of such document in accordance with the terms hereof.
This resolution shall not constitute an offer and the documents shall not be effective until the
date of execution thereof as provided herein.
2.03. In the event of absence or disability of the officers, any of the documents
authorized by this resolution to be executed may be executed without further act or
authorization of the board by any duly designated acting official, or by such other officer or
officers of the board as, in the opinion of the city attorney, may act in their behalf. Upon
execution and delivery of the documents, the officers and employees of the board are hereby
authorized and directed to take or cause to be taken such actions as may be necessary on
behalf of the board to implement the documents.
Section 3. Effective date. This resolution shall be effective upon approval.
Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the Economic Development
Authority March 2, 2026:
Karen Barton, executive director Yolanda Farris, president
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, secretary
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: March 2, 2026
Presentation: 3a
Executive summary
Title: Proclamation observing National Women’s History Month
Recommended action: Mayor to read proclamation observing 2025 Women’s History Month.
Policy consideration: None.
Summary: Women’s History Month, celebrated nationally since 1995, recognizes the
contributions women have made in United States history and provides an opportunity to
recommit to ending the continued inequities women face in our society.
Financial or budget considerations: Not applicable.
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to being a leader in racial equity
and inclusion in order to create a more just and inclusive community for all.
Supporting documents: Resource page
Proclamation
Prepared by: Jocelyn I Hernandez Guitron, racial equity and inclusion specialist
Women’s employee resource group
Reviewed by: Pa Dao Yang, racial equity and inclusion director
Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 3a) Page 2
Title: Proclamation observing National Women’s History Month
Resource Page:
In recognition of Women’s History Month, the City of St. Louis Park encourages you to:
• Learn more about women’s history in our country
o Women of the Hall |
o Center for Women's History | The New York Historical
• Create awareness on Women's History Month
o Rightfully Hers: American Women and the Vote | National Archives Museum
o https://www.history.com/articles/womens-history-month
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 3a) Page 3
Title: Proclamation observing National Women’s History Month
Proclamation observing
“2026 Women’s History Month”
Whereas, the City of St. Louis Park recognizes the leadership and contributions of
women in our city, community and state for Women’s History Month, which includes
International Women’s Day on March 8th; and
Whereas, the St. Louis Park community has elected two women as mayor, most recently
making history by electing Nadia Mohamed as the first woman of color to serve as mayor in St.
Louis Park and the first elected Somali American mayor in the United States; and
Whereas, St. Louis Park is the hometown of Lieutenant Governor Peggy Flanagan, the
country’s highest-ranking Native American woman elected to executive office; and
Whereas, the right for all women to vote and lead in elected office was fought for by
countless women across the country, some women running for office even before they
themselves were allowed to vote; and
Whereas, women contribute to our community as leaders, business owners and
educators and at the same time, the unpaid and undervalued labor of mothers, caretakers and
homemakers bolsters our economy; and
Whereas, women continue to face high rates of gender-based violence, intensified by
environmental and socioeconomic factors such as climate change displacement, the housing
crisis and increased poverty rates; and
Whereas, progress for the rights of women has often left out Indigenous women and
women of color, making it even more important for us to stay committed to racial equity and
inclusion; and this month as a time to recognize the inequities women continue to face and find
ways to support the rights of all women in our community,
Now therefore, let it be known that the mayor and city council of the City of St. Louis
Park, Minnesota, hereby observe Women’s History Month in 2026 and encourage all people to
recognize the magnitude of contributions that women make every day.
Wherefore, I set my hand and cause the
Great Seal of the City of St. Louis Park to be
affixed this 2nd day of March 2026.
________________________________
Nadia Mohamed, mayor
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: March 2, 2026
Presentation: 3b
Executive summary
Title: Proclamation observing World Lymphedema Day
Recommended action: Mayor to read proclamation observing “World Lymphedema Day” on
March 6, 2026.
Policy consideration: None.
Summary: World Lymphedema Day was established in 2016 by the United States Senate in
response to a bill written by the Lymphatic Education & Research Network. The intention of the
day is to educate the world on all lymphatic diseases, including primary and secondary
lymphedema (LE), lipedema (LI), lymphatic filariasis (LF), lymphatic malformations (LM) and the
full lymphatic continuum (LC) of diseases impacted by the lymphatic system.
Lymphedema is a disease that affects up to 10 million Americans and 170 million people
worldwide. It can be hereditary or acquired as a result of cancer treatment or physical trauma.
This debilitating disease results in the accumulation of lymph fluid in the limbs when the
lymphatic system is damaged. Melanoma, breast cancer, prostate and ovarian cancer survivors
are all susceptible. US military veterans suffer from LE as a result of battle injury or trauma from
surgery. Each year, children are born with LE and currently, there is no cure. The effects of the
disease are lifelong, drastically affect quality of life and can lead to shortened lifespans.
This proclamation was requested by resident Sharon Guffan and supported by the city council.
Financial or budget considerations: Not applicable
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to creating opportunities to build
social capital through community engagement.
Supporting documents: Proclamation
Prepared by: Amanda Scott-Lerdal, deputy city clerk
Reviewed by: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk
Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 3b) Page 2
Title: Proclamation observing World Lymphedema Day
Proclamation
Observing “World Lymphedema Day” on March 6, 2026
Whereas, lymphatic diseases affect the lives of 10 million Americans and 170 million
people worldwide; and
Whereas, survivors of cancers, surgeries and traumas are susceptible to acquiring
lymphatic disease while children may be born with lymphatic disease through heredity; and
Whereas, there is no cure for the range of lymphatic disease and care for patients
includes treatment to focus on reduced swelling and preventing complications; and
Whereas, the medical providers who assist patients suffering from lymphedema with a
variety of expert and caring treatments within our city, state and nation are deeply appreciated
for their work; and
Whereas, March 6 is recognized as “World Lymphedema Day”, a day dedicated to
raising awareness and understanding about this disease,
Now therefore let it be known that the mayor and city council of the City of St. Louis
Park, Minnesota, hereby honor March 6, 2026, as “World Lymphedema Day” in our community.
Wherefore, I set my hand and cause the
Great Seal of the City of St. Louis Park to be
affixed this 2nd day of March 2026.
_________________________________
Nadia Mohamed, mayor
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: March 2, 2026
Consent agenda item: 5a
Executive summary
Title: Approve city disbursements
Recommended action: Motion to approve city disbursement claims for the period of Jan. 27
through Feb. 23, 2026.
Policy consideration: Does the city council approve city disbursements for the period ending
Feb. 23, 2026?
Summary: The finance department prepares this report monthly for the city council to review
and approve. The attached report shows both city disbursements paid by physical check and
those by wire transfer or Automated Clearing House (ACH) when applicable.
Financial or budget considerations: Review and approval of the information by council is
required by the city charter and provides another layer of oversight to further ensure fiscal
stewardship.
Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable.
Supporting documents: Disbursement summary
Prepared by: Estela Mulugeta, accounting specialist
Reviewed by: Amelia Cruver, finance director
Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager
CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK
Council Check Summary
2/23/20261/27/2026 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
357.003RD LAIR Organized Rec G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
357.00
435.00ADVANCED GRAPHIX INC Fire Department G&A Repairs and Maintenance
435.00
505.22ALI JAMILO Water G&A
505.22
14,617.00ALLIANCE MECH SRVCS INC Facilties Maintenance G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
14,617.00
4,731.20ALLSTREAMIT G&A Telephone Communications
4,731.20
584.68AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES Police G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
64.46Technology G&A Technology Supplies
15.76Organized Rec G&A Admin/Office Supplies & Mat
664.90
.21AMELSE MICHELLE Water G&A
.21
472.50AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING INC Facilties Maintenance G&A Repairs and Maintenance
472.50
250.00AMERICAN PRESSURE, INC.Vehicle Maintenance G&A Repairs and Maintenance
250.00
2,475.45ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS Fire Department G&A Repairs, Maint, Serv on Tech
2,475.45
525.40ANDERSON LUKE Water G&A
525.40
175.00ANDERSON SHARON Building and Energy G&A
175.00
1,060.00APEX ENGINEERING GROUP INC Development - EDA G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
1,060.00
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5a)
Title: Approve city disbursements Page 2
CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK
Council Check Summary
2/23/20261/27/2026 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
805.35APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES Vehicle Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
805.35
291.75ARNOLD CHUCK Water G&A
291.75
452.00ARROW LIFT ACCESSIBILITY Park Maintenance G&A Dues, Memberships, Licenses
452.00
1,358.03ASPEN MILLS Fire Department G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
1,358.03
9,000.00ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA BUILDING Building and Energy G&A Other Travel, Conv & Conf
9,000.00
350.00ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA COUNTIES Facilties Maintenance G&A Dues, Memberships, Licenses
350.00
268.00AUTO ELECTRIC SERVICE Vehicle Maintenance G&A Repairs and Maintenance
268.00
275.48AUTOWASH SYSTEMS INC Vehicle Maintenance G&A Repairs and Maintenance
275.48
46.92AUTOZONE STORES LLC General Fund BS Inventory
46.92
199,970.30AXON ENTERPRISE, INC.Technology G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
199,970.30
32.50B&D PLUMBING, HEATING & AC Building and Energy G&A
32.50
77.76BALCOS OPHELIA Water G&A
77.76
3,000.00BASIA DRILLING Climate Investment G&A
3,000.00
299.66BAXTER BRIAN Water G&A
299.66
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5a)
Title: Approve city disbursements Page 3
CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK
Council Check Summary
2/23/20261/27/2026 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
196.43BECKER JONATHAN G Water G&A
196.43
395,298.66BELTLINE RESIDENCES LLC Beltline Residences TIF G&A
395,298.66
86.56BERG KELLIE Climate Investment G&A
37.10Park Improvement G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
123.66
1,044.00BERNATELLO'S FOODS Rec Center Gen Division G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
1,044.00
813.43BERRY COFFEE COMPANY Rec Center Gen Division G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
813.43
6,423.71BETH EL SYNAGOGUE Climate Investment G&A
6,423.71
156,907.11BIGOS-VIA SOL LLC Wooddale Station TIF G&A
156,907.11
3,600.00BLACK & VEATCH CORPORATION Water G&A
3,600.00
47,837.41BOF II MN WEST END OFFICE PARK LLC Climate Investment G&A
47,837.41
145.99BOLTON & MENK INC Street Capital G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
291.98Franchise Fees G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
539.04Water G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
581.15Sewer G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
824.84Storm Water Utility G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
2,383.00
175,000.00BOND TRUST SERVICES CORP 2024A GO Bonds G&A Bond Principal
72,350.002024A GO Bonds G&A Bond Interest
180,000.002022B G&A Bond Principal
93,513.752022B G&A Bond Interest
905,000.002021A G&A Bond Principal
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5a)
Title: Approve city disbursements Page 4
CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK
Council Check Summary
2/23/20261/27/2026 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
91,883.752021A G&A Bond Interest
575,000.002020A G&A Bond Principal
123,975.002020A G&A Bond Interest
920,000.002019A G&A Bond Principal
300,319.382019A G&A Bond Interest
210,000.002018A G&A Bond Principal
14,550.002018A G&A Bond Interest
280,000.002019C G&A Bond Principal
7,167.502019C G&A Bond Interest
615,000.002019B G&A Bond Principal
100,425.002019B G&A Bond Interest
370,000.002017A GO DEBT SERV G&A Bond Principal
13,918.762017A GO DEBT SERV G&A Bond Interest
555,000.002014A GO DEBT SERV G&A Bond Principal
5,550.002014A GO DEBT SERV G&A Bond Interest
1,140,000.002016A GO DEBT SERV G&A Bond Principal
17,934.382016A GO DEBT SERV G&A Bond Interest
75,000.00LA CRT 2022A Refund 2010C G&A Bond Principal
22,270.63LA CRT 2022A Refund 2010C G&A Bond Interest
2,305,000.00Water BS BONDS PAYABLE-CURRENT PORTION
115,000.002024B GO Bonds Water G&A Bond Interest
5,400.002014A Revenue Bonds Bond Interest
31,459.382017A Revenue Bonds Bond Interest
51,875.002018A Revenue Bonds Bond Interest
78,075.002019B Revenue Bonds Bond Interest
57,875.002020A Revenue Bonds Bond Interest
75,000.00Sewer BS BONDS PAYABLE-CURRENT PORTION
65,000.00Sewer BS BONDS PAYABLE
7,578.122017A Revenue Bonds Bond Interest
10,575.002018A Revenue Bonds Bond Interest
145,000.00Storm Water Utility BS BONDS PAYABLE-CURRENT PORTION
18,125.002019B Revenue Bonds Bond Interest
9,829,820.65
475.37BOUND TREE MEDICAL, LLC Fire Department G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
475.37
580.00BREDEMUS HARDWARE COMPANY INC Facilties Maintenance G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
580.00
163,005.89BRIDGEWATER BANK Parkway Residual TIF G&A
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5a)
Title: Approve city disbursements Page 5
CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK
Council Check Summary
2/23/20261/27/2026 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
163,005.89
900,000.00BROADWAY STREET DEVELOPMENT LLC Development - EDA G&A
900,000.00
2,150.00BROWN DAVID ROBERT Climate Investment G&A
2,150.00
1,822.80-BUCKINGHAM TRUCKING LLC Solid Waste G&A Refunds/Reimbursements
383,936.38Solid Waste G&A Solid Waste Utility
231,101.93Solid Waste G&A Recycling Utility
613,215.51
93.24BUSINESS ESSENTIALS Comm & Marketing G&A Admin/Office Supplies & Mat
93.24
100.00BWS PLUMBING HEATING & AC Building and Energy G&A
100.00
13,200.00CALYPTUS CONSULTING GROUP INC REI G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
13,200.00
3,848.00CANON FINANCIAL Technology G&A Short Term Lease/Rentals Pay
3,848.00
537.60CAR WASH PARTNERS, INC.Vehicle Maintenance G&A Repairs and Maintenance
537.60
1,303.25CATANZANITE MATTHEW Water G&A
1,303.25
1,221.62CBIZ INVESTMENT ADVISORY SERVICES, LLC. Employee Benefits G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
1,221.62
11,926.33CDW GOVERNMENT INC Water G&A
39.08Technology G&A Technology Supplies
9,362.33Technology G&A Capitalized Tech Hardware
21,327.74
975.00CENTER FOR COACHING EXCELLENCE Police G&A Other Travel, Conv & Conf
975.00
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5a)
Title: Approve city disbursements Page 6
CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK
Council Check Summary
2/23/20261/27/2026 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
30,852.70CENTER FOR ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT Affordable H Trust G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
705.00Housing Rehab G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
31,557.70
24,307.82CENTERPOINT ENERGY Facilties Maintenance G&A Heating Gas Utility
1,362.48EDA - 4300 36 1/2 G&A Heating Gas Utility
9,406.13Water G&A Heating Gas Utility
619.25Water Reilly G&A Heating Gas Utility
798.92Sewer G&A Heating Gas Utility
13,399.83Park Maintenance G&A Heating Gas Utility
49,894.43
21.00CENTRAL MCGOWAN INC Rec Center Gen Division G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
21.00
15,702.83CENTRAL PENSION FUND Employee Benefits BS OTHER RETIREMENT
15,702.83
71.91CENTURY LINK IT G&A Telephone Communications
256.00Technology G&A Other Communications
327.91
3.55CHAMBERLAIN LAURA Community Development G&A Employee Mileage Reimbursement
3.55
4,140.00CHAMPLIN ATHLETIC Organized Rec G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
4,140.00
3,000.00CHILTON JR. DALE PATRICK Climate Investment G&A
3,000.00
1,014.00CHUXWestwood G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
1,014.00
270.56CINTAS CORPORATION Facilties Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
15.06Public Works G&A Admin/Office Supplies & Mat
148.31Water G&A Admin/Office Supplies & Mat
30.12Park Maintenance G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
72.87Park Maintenance G&A Admin/Office Supplies & Mat
483.44Park Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5a)
Title: Approve city disbursements Page 7
CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK
Council Check Summary
2/23/20261/27/2026 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
255.00Rec Center Gen Division G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
45.18Rec Center Gen Division G&A Admin/Office Supplies & Mat
109.99Rec Center Gen Division G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
32.04Vehicle Maintenance G&A Admin/Office Supplies & Mat
1,462.57
7,802.27CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY DMV Vehicles & Equipment G&A Vehicles/Machinery Purch
7,802.27
21,612.00CITY OF SLP HA-KIDS IN THE PARK Affordable H Trust G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
21,612.00
4,950.00-CJC CONSTRUCTION, LLC.Property Casualty BS RETAINAGE PAYABLE
99,000.00Property Casualty G&A Property Insurance
94,050.00
50.00CLIFFORD EMMA Organized Rec G&A Refunds/Reimbursements
50.00
421.04COLE PAPERS Facilties Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
421.04
21,241.49COLICH & ASSOCIATES Adminstrative Operations G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
21,241.49
1,690.00COLLINS ELECTRICAL Property Casualty G&A Property Insurance
1,690.00
136.78COMCASTFire Department G&A Electric Utility
195.78Cable TV G&A Other Communications
30.03Rec Center Gen Division G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
362.59
245.00CONLIFFE LEROY REI G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
245.00
107.75COOPERMAN RODNEY & JUDITH Water G&A
107.75
161.82CORE & MAIN LP Water G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
161.82
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5a)
Title: Approve city disbursements Page 8
CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK
Council Check Summary
2/23/20261/27/2026 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
17,250.00CORNERHOUSEPolice G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
17,250.00
12,500.00CORNERSTONE ADVOCACY SERVICE Police G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
12,500.00
16,730.00CORPORATE MECHANICAL Rec Center Gen Division G&A Repairs and Maintenance
16,730.00
6,707.28COSTAR REALTY INFORMATION, INC.Assessing G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
6,707.28
3,354.40COUGHLIN, JUDY Organized Rec G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
3,354.40
1,994.60CREATIVE RESOURCES Organized Rec G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
1,994.60
74.36CROWN MARKING INC.Comm & Marketing G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
74.36
119.00CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER Facilties Maintenance G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
119.00
1,988.43CUSHMAN MOTOR CO INC General Fund BS Inventory
1,988.43
7,511.00DAVID RIVERA Organized Rec G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
7,511.00
426.31DELEGARD TOOL CO Vehicle Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
426.31
22.40DEM-CON DUMPSTERS LLC Vehicle Maintenance G&A Recycling Utility
22.40
310.10DEMPSEY KERRWIN Engineering G&A Other Travel, Conv & Conf
310.10
25.00DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY Facilties Maintenance G&A Dues, Memberships, Licenses
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5a)
Title: Approve city disbursements Page 9
CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK
Council Check Summary
2/23/20261/27/2026 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
8,627.38Building and Energy G&A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS
8,652.38
371.05DETECTACHEM, INC.Police G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
371.05
37.43DICKMAN JANICE Water G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
37.43
262.58DILLON CHRISTINE Water G&A
262.58
13,457.58DLT SOLUTIONS INC Technology G&A Capitalized Tech Software
13,457.58
423.16DO-GOOD.BIZ INC Street Capital G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
423.16
460.82DTN, LLC.Public Works G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
460.82
2,043,601.63DUKE REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Duke West End TIF G&A
2,043,601.63
141.10E WEINBERG SUPPLY & EQUIPMENT Facilties Maintenance G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
141.10
847.36ECM PUBLISHERS INC City Clerk's Office G&A Postage & Delivery
847.36
6,062.50EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC General Fund BS GENERAL
3,750.002020A G&A Other Debt Serv Expend
773.29Mera Wayzata Project TIF G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
773.29 Beltline Residences TIF G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
773.29Wooddale Ave Ap TIF G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
773.29Texa Tonka TIF G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
773.29Parkway Residual TIF G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
773.29Bridgewater Bank TIF G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
773.29Wooddale Station TIF G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
773.29Duke West End TIF G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
773.29Park Commons TIF G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5a)
Title: Approve city disbursements Page 10
CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK
Council Check Summary
2/23/20261/27/2026 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
773.29Rise on 7 TIF G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
773.35Hwy 7 Business Center TIF G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
18,318.75
600.00ELEVATE COACHING INC Public Works G&A Other Travel, Conv & Conf
600.00
2,725.25ENTERPRISE FM TRUST Vehicle Maintenance G&A Short Term Lease/Rentals Pay
2,725.25
4,017.00ENVIROTECH SERVICES INC Public Works G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
4,017.00
225.00ERIC J. HANSEN, AIA Housing Rehab G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
225.00
121.95ERIKSON ROY Water G&A
121.95
86.55ETHICAL HOMEBUYERS LLC Water G&A
86.55
18,578.63EVERBRIDGE INC Technology G&A Capitalized Tech Software
18,578.63
103.39FACTORY MOTOR PARTS CO General Fund BS Inventory
103.39
419.37FASTENAL COMPANY Fire Department G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
419.37
73.31FAUST LANCE Water G&A
73.31
224.38FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC Water G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
224.38
8,364.07FERGUSON WATERWORKS Water G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
8,364.07
300.00FIDELIS SAFETY SOLUTIONS Fire Department G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5a)
Title: Approve city disbursements Page 11
CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK
Council Check Summary
2/23/20261/27/2026 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
300.00
6.31FILEK KATRINA A Cable TV G&A Employee Mileage Reimbursement
6.31
316.32FINANCE & COMMERCE, INC.Franchise Fees G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
170.32Storm Water Utility G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
486.64
36.71FIRST ADVANTAGE Human Resources G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
36.71
3,597.79FIRST ARRIVING LLC Technology G&A Capitalized Tech Software
3,597.79
3,510.00FIRST RESPONSE MENTAL HEALTH INC Police G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
3,510.00
297.21FORCE AMERICA, INC.Park Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
297.21
1,602.80FORECAST PUBLIC ART Adminstrative Operations G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
1,602.80
132.14FOREMAN BENJAMIN Water G&A
132.14
525.00FOREST LAKE CONTRACTING INC Facilties Maintenance G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
525.00
123.10FRANCIS, ERICK Storm Water Utility G&A Other Travel, Conv & Conf
123.10
55.92FRATTALLONESPark Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
55.92
76.13FRIEDERICH NIKKI Organized Rec G&A Employee Mileage Reimbursement
76.13
349.89FRIEMEL MARK Water G&A
349.89
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5a)
Title: Approve city disbursements Page 12
CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK
Council Check Summary
2/23/20261/27/2026 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
58.08GIBBER CHAIM Water G&A
58.08
412.06GJERDE JON Water G&A
412.06
119.60GLEASON PRINTING Comm & Marketing G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
119.60
6,997.86GMH ASPHALT CORPORATION Street Capital BS RETAINAGE PAYABLE
100,192.95Franchise Fees BS RETAINAGE PAYABLE
99,585.47Franchise Fees G&A
52,117.84Water BS RETAINAGE PAYABLE
22,147.92Water G&A
10,418.80Sewer BS RETAINAGE PAYABLE
13,684.31Storm Water Utility BS RETAINAGE PAYABLE
3,294.00Storm Water Utility G&A
308,439.15
1,432,800.92GOTTMAR LLC Park Commons TIF G&A
1,432,800.92
449.62GRAINGER INC.Water G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
375.47Park Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
23.54Vehicle Maintenance G&A Repairs and Maintenance
161.13Vehicle Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
1,009.76
109.61GRUIDL BRIAN Water G&A
109.61
65,341.10GUARDIAN FLEET SAFETY Vehicles & Equipment G&A Vehicles/Machinery Purch
65,341.10
1,732.00H & L MESABI General Fund BS Inventory
1,732.00
82.00HACH CO Water G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
82.00
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5a)
Title: Approve city disbursements Page 13
CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK
Council Check Summary
2/23/20261/27/2026 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
1,163.82HAND JACKSON Water G&A
1,163.82
32,561.19HAWKINS INC Water G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
32,561.19
528.00HEALTHPARTNERS OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE Human Resources G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
528.00
3,100.00HENDRICKSON JEANNIE Street Capital G&A
3,100.00
1,006.88HENNEPIN COUNTY Police G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
1,006.88
30.00HENNEPIN COUNTY ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE Police G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
4,736.84Police G&A Radio Communications
2,398.40Fire Department G&A Radio Communications
269.82Public Works G&A Radio Communications
269.82Water G&A Radio Communications
269.82Sewer G&A Radio Communications
269.82Storm Water Utility G&A Radio Communications
629.83Park Maintenance G&A Solid Waste Utility
8,874.35
22,107.75HENNEPIN COUNTY ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE-ACHPolice G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
22,107.75
25.00HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY TAX Finance G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
3,368.33Mera Wayzata Project TIF G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
3,829.52 Beltline Residences TIF G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
2,424.19Wooddale Ave Ap TIF G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
2,878.52Texa Tonka TIF G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
2,966.43Parkway Residual TIF G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
5,934.90Bridgewater Bank TIF G&A TAX INCREMENTS
2,863.81Bridgewater Bank TIF G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
2,983.87Wooddale Station TIF G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
119,461.82Duke West End TIF G&A TAX INCREMENTS
11,064.72Duke West End TIF G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
14,122.49Park Commons TIF G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
2,412.37Rise on 7 TIF G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5a)
Title: Approve city disbursements Page 14
CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK
Council Check Summary
2/23/20261/27/2026 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
2,676.65Hwy 7 Business Center TIF G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
177,012.62
152.65HEPPELMANN ROBYN Water G&A
152.65
78,729.50HIGHWAY 7 BUSINESS CENTER LLC Hwy 7 Business Center TIF G&A
78,729.50
184.90HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MFG INC Park Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
184.90
1,900.00HOLDEN JOSEPH T Climate Investment G&A
1,900.00
147.00HOLMES KARI REI G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
147.00
3,000.00HOLT BRIANA Climate Investment G&A
3,000.00
627.41HORNER KEVIN Water G&A
627.41
41.05HORNER MURIEL Water G&A
41.05
94.92HU YUQIN Water G&A
94.92
1,474.00HUMERA TECH INC Rec Center Gen Division G&A Repairs, Maint, Serv on Tech
1,474.00
400.00HUNTER & BRIANNA TUVERSON General Fund BS UNION PARK APTS
400.00
209.33HUSSAIN KELSEY LEIGH Water G&A
209.33
1,715.00I.U.O.E. LOCAL NO 49 Employee Benefits BS UNION DUES
1,715.00
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5a)
Title: Approve city disbursements Page 15
CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK
Council Check Summary
2/23/20261/27/2026 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
940.53IMPACT POWER TO CONNECT Water G&A Postage & Delivery
940.53Sewer G&A Postage & Delivery
940.53Solid Waste G&A Postage & Delivery
940.53Storm Water Utility G&A Postage & Delivery
3,762.12
76.84INDELCOPublic Works G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
55.55Water G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
58.34Sewer G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
1,386.00Park Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
1,576.73
8,588.00INDUSTRIAL NETWORKING SOLUTIONS Police G&A Software Licensing Less 12 Mo
8,588.00
250.00INGCO INTERNATIONAL Comm & Marketing G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
250.00
7,200.00INMAPZ INC Facilties Maintenance G&A Dues, Memberships, Licenses
7,200.00
1,319.87INVER GROVE FORD Vehicle Maintenance G&A Repairs and Maintenance
1,319.87
14,578.95INVOICE CLOUD INC Water G&A Misc Expenditures
14,578.95
95.28IRON BUILT REAL ESTATE LLC Water G&A
95.28
10,800.00IRON MALTESE ATHLETICS Fire Department G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
10,800.00
1,221.90J & B HOLDINGS LLC Water G&A
1,221.90
170.44J & F REDDY RENTS Water G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
24.00Park Maintenance G&A Short Term Lease/Rentals Pay
194.44
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5a)
Title: Approve city disbursements Page 16
CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK
Council Check Summary
2/23/20261/27/2026 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
1,650.00JACKIE ADELMANN PHOTOGRAPHY Comm & Marketing G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
1,650.00
3,000.00JANSSEN MATTHEW Storm Water Utility G&A
3,000.00
1,300.33JAYTECH, INC.Rec Center Gen Division G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
1,300.33
220.00JEFFERSON FIRE & SAFETY INC Fire Department G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
220.00
30.00JENKINS ELISIA Building and Energy G&A
30.00
1,733.26JOHNSON PAPER & SUPPLY CO.Rec Center Gen Division G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
1,733.26
207.58JONES DAN Water G&A
207.58
400.00JONES LEVY Organized Rec G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
400.00
62.76JPS HOMES, LLC.Water G&A
62.76
145.00JULIAR JAY Building and Energy G&A
145.00
1,500.00JUSTINIANO GABRIELLA E Climate Investment G&A
1,500.00
1,300.00KELLY SCHUG SHANNON Climate Investment G&A
1,300.00
4,875.00KEYSTONE COMPENSATION GROUP LLC Human Resources G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
4,875.00
7,071.00KFI ENGINEERS Municipal Building & Infra G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
7,071.00
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5a)
Title: Approve city disbursements Page 17
CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK
Council Check Summary
2/23/20261/27/2026 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
304.00KIDCREATE STUDIO Organized Rec G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
304.00
23.40KILLMER ELECTRIC CO INC Building and Energy G&A
23.40
7,036.71KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC Street Capital G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
70,551.67MSA Capital G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
798.39Water G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
308.87Sewer G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
1,215.84Storm Water Utility G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
79,911.48
167.42KINGS III EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS LLC Facilties Maintenance G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
167.42
2,000.00KINNEY MATTHEW Climate Investment G&A
2,000.00
5,484.35KLEIN UNDERGROUND LLC Water G&A Repairs and Maintenance
5,484.35
191.39KLEVE MONICA Water G&A
191.39
93.22KNG HOMES LLC Water G&A
93.22
145.00KOEHLER KATARINA Rec Center Gen Division G&A Refunds/Reimbursements
145.00
97.12KOSOBAYASHI KEVAN Water G&A
97.12
52.06KRIVOSHA TERRI Water G&A
52.06
8,693.00KUTAK ROCK LLP EDA - Beltline SWLRT G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
574.00Development - EDA G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
9,267.00
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5a)
Title: Approve city disbursements Page 18
CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK
Council Check Summary
2/23/20261/27/2026 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
202.08LABATT KATHRYN Water G&A
202.08
206.96LAKE AREA HOMES RENEWED LLC Water G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
206.96
177.00LARSON LAURA Water G&A
177.00
4,613.62LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES INC Employee Benefits BS UNION DUES
4,613.62
176.49LAWSON PRODUCTS INC Vehicle Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
176.49
37,693.00LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INSURANCE TRUST City Clerk's Office G&A Dues, Memberships, Licenses
179,849.00Human Resources G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
1,000.00Property Casualty G&A Property Insurance
218,542.00
1,000.00LEE MENG TING Climate Investment G&A
1,000.00
3,136.13LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS LLC IT G&A Telephone Communications
3,136.13
666.67LEXISNEXIS RISK SOLUTIONS Police G&A Software Licensing Less 12 Mo
666.67
228.05LIBERTY TIRE Vehicle Maintenance G&A Recycling Utility
228.05
161.21LINDBERG SHIRLEY Water G&A
161.21
2,050.00LINKEDIN CORPORATION Human Resources G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
2,050.00
128.93LIVE WIRE ELECTRICAL SERVICES Building and Energy G&A
128.93
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5a)
Title: Approve city disbursements Page 19
CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK
Council Check Summary
2/23/20261/27/2026 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
4,081.50LOCKGUARD LOCKSMITHS Facilties Maintenance G&A Repairs and Maintenance
1,154.00Rec Center Gen Division G&A Repairs and Maintenance
5,235.50
1,884.25LOFFLERTechnology G&A Short Term Lease/Rentals Pay
1,884.25
313.02LOFFLER COMPANIES INC Technology G&A Short Term Lease/Rentals Pay
313.02
166,815.00LOGISTechnology G&A Repairs, Maint, Serv on Tech
12,750.79Technology G&A Computers/Tech Services
150.00Technology G&A Technology Devices
29,750.00Technology G&A Capitalized Tech Software
209,465.79
15.95LOMBARDI, JIM Organized Rec G&A Employee Mileage Reimbursement
15.95
206.84M G INCENTIVES Human Resources G&A Admin/Office Supplies & Mat
206.84
54.01MACQUEEN EQUIP CO Fire Department G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
54.01
18,788.98MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY OF GAINSVILLE, INC General Fund BS Inventory
18,788.98
779.21MAP PARTNERSHIP LLP Water G&A
779.21
1,159.12MARIA ARACELI PATROCINIO ENDRES Water G&A
1,159.12
2,620.00MARIE RIDGEWAY LICSW LLC Police G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
2,620.00
335.86MARTINSON MELVIN Water G&A
335.86
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5a)
Title: Approve city disbursements Page 20
CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK
Council Check Summary
2/23/20261/27/2026 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
493.85MASTER TECHNOLOGY GROUP Technology G&A Repairs, Maint, Serv on Tech
493.85
49.63MATHESON TRI-GAS, INC.Vehicle Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
49.63
800.00MAURER CARRIE General Fund BS UNION PARK APTS
800.00
100.00MCMAHON ELISE Rec Center Gen Division G&A Refunds/Reimbursements
100.00
157.63METRO POLITAN DEVELOPMENT Building and Energy G&A
157.63
666.00METRO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS ASSOC. Organized Rec G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
666.00
599.42METROPOLITAN COMPOUNDS INC Fire Department G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
599.42
516,631.50METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Building and Energy G&A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS
474,319.79Sewer G&A Water Utility
1,140.00Storm Water Utility G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
992,091.29
1,569.24MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PYT CTR Employee Benefits BS WAGE GARNISHMENTS
1,569.24
55.00MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROLAGENCY Sewer G&A Other Travel, Conv & Conf
55.00
50.00MINNESOTA RECREATION & PARK ASSOC Human Resources G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
1,310.00Park Maintenance G&A Other Travel, Conv & Conf
1,360.00
75.00MINNESOTA STATE FIRE CHIEFS ASSOC. Fire Department G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
75.00
30,490.40MN DNR ECO-WATER-RES Water G&A Dues, Memberships, Licenses
840.00Water Reilly G&A Dues, Memberships, Licenses
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5a)
Title: Approve city disbursements Page 21
CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK
Council Check Summary
2/23/20261/27/2026 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
31,330.40
72.00MN PLUMBING AND HOME SERVICES Building and Energy G&A Construction Permits
72.00
8,240.00MOMENTUM ADVOCACY LLP Adminstrative Operations G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
8,240.00
55.09MONTERO ESTUARDO Water G&A
55.09
18,780.90MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS Police E-911 Restriction G&A Software Licensing Less 12 Mo
18,780.90
364.00MR CUTTING EDGE Rec Center Gen Division G&A Repairs and Maintenance
364.00
15.42MROSZAK MELISSA Water G&A
15.42
14,097.00MWP RECREATION Facilties Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
14,097.00
1,630.87NAPA (GENUINE PARTS CO)General Fund BS Inventory
22.56Public Works G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
237.60Water G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
62.89Vehicle Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
1,953.92
100.00NATOACable TV G&A Dues, Memberships, Licenses
100.00
4,759.75NETOFF THEODEN Climate Investment G&A
4,759.75
1,160.00NEWPUBLICASustainability G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
1,160.00
352.53NICHOLS IRENE Water G&A
352.53
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5a)
Title: Approve city disbursements Page 22
CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK
Council Check Summary
2/23/20261/27/2026 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
2.07NKP LLC Water G&A
2.07
250.00NOKOMIS SHOE SHOP Park Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
250.00
151.68NORTH AMERICAN SAFETY INC Park Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
151.68
733.38NORTHLAND MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS INC Facilties Maintenance G&A Repairs, Maint, Serv on Tech
733.38
310.07NORTHSTAR MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT INC Facilties Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
310.07
185.00NOVACARE REHABILITATION Human Resources G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
185.00
80.00O'DONNELL TOM Vehicle Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
80.00
230.08ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LLC Human Resources G&A Admin/Office Supplies & Mat
58.53Comm & Marketing G&A Admin/Office Supplies & Mat
52.20Community Development G&A Admin/Office Supplies & Mat
312.69Police G&A Admin/Office Supplies & Mat
53.99Building and Energy G&A Admin/Office Supplies & Mat
5.56Public Works G&A Admin/Office Supplies & Mat
111.45Water G&A Admin/Office Supplies & Mat
224.86Organized Rec G&A Admin/Office Supplies & Mat
132.06Westwood G&A Admin/Office Supplies & Mat
76.45Vehicle Maintenance G&A Admin/Office Supplies & Mat
1,257.87
13.05OELRICH JETHRO Assessing G&A Employee Mileage Reimbursement
13.05
732.50OESTREICH, MARK A Climate Investment G&A
732.50
2,383.29OFFICE OF MNIT SERVICES Technology G&A Capitalized Tech Software
2,383.29
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5a)
Title: Approve city disbursements Page 23
CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK
Council Check Summary
2/23/20261/27/2026 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
271,174.17OLD NATIONAL BANK Mera Wayzata Project TIF G&A
271,174.17
67.00ON SITE SANITATION Organized Rec G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
134.00Park Maintenance G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
201.00
368.93O'REILLY FIRST CALL General Fund BS Inventory
368.93
177.87OSTER PAUL Water G&A
177.87
4,505.43OVERHEAD DOOR COMPANY OF THE NORTHLANDFacilties Maintenance G&A Repairs, Maint, Serv on Tech
4,505.43
1,193.53OXYGEN SERVICE COMPANY INC Fire Department G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
1,193.53
3,745.00PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES INC Water G&A
368.00Water Reilly G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
4,113.00
68.00PALEY DANIEL Building and Energy G&A
68.00
189.95PALMQUIST, DANA Park Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
189.95
400.00PARKTACULAR FESTIVAL Organized Rec G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
400.00
5,551.25PARSONS ELECTRIC Municipal Building & Infra G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
5,551.25
21,913.80PEPPER BALL Police G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
21,913.80
138.97PEROT EMILY Water G&A
138.97
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5a)
Title: Approve city disbursements Page 24
CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK
Council Check Summary
2/23/20261/27/2026 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
4,118.19PMA ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC CITY POOLED INVESTMENTS Misc Expenditures
4,118.19
300.00POLLARD ESTHER Westwood G&A Refunds/Reimbursements
300.00
405.68POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC General Fund BS Inventory
405.68
283,750.00PPL UNION PARK FLATS COMMUNITY LIMITED Development - EDA G&A
283,750.00
1,242.00PRECISE MRM, LLC.Park Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
1,242.00
633.06PREMIUM WATERS Fire Department G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
633.06
1,377.30PRO-TREE OUTDOOR SERVICES Natural Resources G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
1,377.30
100.00PURPOSE DRIVEN RESTAURANTS LLC Police G&A FALSE ALARM
100.00
3,194.92QUALITY FLOW SYSTEMS INC Water G&A Repairs and Maintenance
3,194.92
61.96QUICKSILVER EXPRESS COURIER Vehicle Maintenance G&A Postage & Delivery
61.96
1,854.95R & R SPECIALTIES OF WISCONSIN, INC. Rec Center Gen Division G&A Admin/Office Supplies & Mat
3,196.35Rec Center Gen Division G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
5,051.30
350.85RAASCH KRISTINE Water G&A
350.85
715.08RALKE THOMAS Water G&A
715.08
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5a)
Title: Approve city disbursements Page 25
CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK
Council Check Summary
2/23/20261/27/2026 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
515.04REACH FOR RESOURCES INC Organized Rec G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
515.04
17,067.36REAL ESTATE EQUITIES Wooddale Ave Ap TIF G&A
17,067.36
515.97REALTY PROS LLC Water G&A
515.97
12,797.70REDPATH & COMPANY LLC Finance G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
12,797.70
14,250.08REHRIG PACIFIC COMPANY Solid Waste G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
14,250.08
10,678.04REPUBLIC SERVICES Facilties Maintenance G&A Solid Waste Utility
81,748.76Solid Waste G&A Organics Utility Expense
9,246.46Rec Center Gen Division G&A Solid Waste Utility
101,673.26
225.89RICKE STEPHANIE Water G&A
225.89
1,000.00RIDDLE JUSTIN Climate Investment G&A
1,000.00
1,734.67RIEDELL SHOES, INC.Rec Center Gen Division G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
1,734.67
1,504.44ROBERT B HILL CO Facilties Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
1,504.44
2,000.00ROOD RANDI Climate Investment G&A
2,000.00
103.75ROSALIA LLC Building and Energy G&A
103.75
3,000.00ROSE DIANE KAY Climate Investment G&A
3,000.00
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5a)
Title: Approve city disbursements Page 26
CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK
Council Check Summary
2/23/20261/27/2026 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
546.63ROSEVILLE MIDWAY FORD General Fund BS Inventory
222.75Vehicles & Equipment G&A Vehicles/Machinery Purch
2,185.70Vehicle Maintenance G&A Repairs and Maintenance
2,955.08
2,500.00RUBINS JEFFREY General Fund BS UNION PARK APTS
2,500.00
650.00RUUD KATHERINE Climate Investment G&A
650.00
900.00Sabes Jewish Community Center Police G&A Other Travel, Conv & Conf
900.00
2,536.99SAFTEY VEHICLE SOLUTIONS Vehicles & Equipment G&A Vehicles/Machinery Purch
2,536.99
2,287.50SALZER MICHAEL Climate Investment G&A
2,287.50
125.00SAR SHALOM KEHILAT Police G&A
125.00
25,000.00SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES Affordable H Trust G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
25,000.00
320.00SETS DESIGN INC.Police G&A Admin/Office Supplies & Mat
40.00Police G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
360.00
140.00SEVERSON CHRISTOPHER Building and Energy G&A
140.00
1,500.00SEVOLD JUSTIN Climate Investment G&A
1,500.00
4,120.00SHADYWOOD TREE EXPERTS & LANDSCAPING Natural Resources G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
4,120.00
1,316.06SHAPCO PRINTING INC Comm & Marketing G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
395.00Sustainability G&A Other Supplies & Materials
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5a)
Title: Approve city disbursements Page 27
CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK
Council Check Summary
2/23/20261/27/2026 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
1,711.06
188,946.79SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP Technology G&A Capitalized Tech Software
188,946.79
3,209.99SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON, INC.Street Capital G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
1,487.46MSA Capital G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
4,122.91Franchise Fees G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
5,384.24Water G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
838.45Sewer G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
4,192.51Storm Water Utility G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
19,235.56
233.23SHRADER HANNAH Rec Center Gen Division G&A Refunds/Reimbursements
233.23
104.64SHROYER TAMI Water G&A
104.64
220.80SHUBEEBuilding and Energy G&A Admin/Office Supplies & Mat
220.80
96.00SIGNATURE ELECTRIC CO Building and Energy G&A
96.00
550.13SIGNATURE MECHANICAL INC Park Maintenance G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
550.13
63.00SINAR LLC Water G&A
63.00
3,223.07SLP FF ASSOC IAFF LOCAL #993 Employee Benefits BS UNION DUES
3,223.07
65.89SPS COMPANIES INC Water G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
65.89
2,444.91SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC Engineering G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
2,395.50Sewer G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
4,840.41
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5a)
Title: Approve city disbursements Page 28
CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK
Council Check Summary
2/23/20261/27/2026 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
236.00STATE CHEMICAL SOLUTIONS Rec Center Gen Division G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
236.00
25.03STERICYCLE, INC.Adminstrative Operations G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
28.60Finance G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
88.39Community Development G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
173.39Police G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
25.03Building and Energy G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
25.03Public Works G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
365.47
9,500.00STERTIL KONI Municipal Building & Infra G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
165,251.46Municipal Building & Infra G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
174,751.46
90.56STIELOW MICHAEL Water G&A
90.56
5,450.00STRATUS BUILDING SOLUTIONS OF ST. PAUL Facilties Maintenance G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
2,850.00Rec Center Gen Division G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
8,300.00
37,870.97STREICHER'S Police G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
37,870.97
37,391.16STRYKER SALES LLC Municipal Building & Infra G&A Capitalized Tech Hardware
37,391.16
356.75SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION Rec Center Gen Division G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
356.75
5,750.00SUSTAINABLE RESOURCES CENTER Affordable H Trust G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
5,750.00
1,660.00SWANK MOTION PICTURES, INC.Organized Rec G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
1,660.00
23.50SWANSON MITCHELL Police G&A In-State Travel
23.50
7,234.21SYSCO-MINNESOTA INC Rec Center Gen Division G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5a)
Title: Approve city disbursements Page 29
CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK
Council Check Summary
2/23/20261/27/2026 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
7,234.21
2,796.35TACTICAL ADVANTAGE Police G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
2,796.35
400.80TALKPOINT TECHNOLOGIES INC Police E-911 Restriction G&A Technology Supplies
400.80
10,316.28TARGETSOLUTIONS LEARNING, LLC Police G&A Other Travel, Conv & Conf
5,431.20Police G&A Software Licensing Less 12 Mo
15,747.48
66.90TENNANT SALES AND SERVICE CO.General Fund BS Inventory
66.90
133.15TERMINAL SUPPLY CO Vehicle Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
133.15
914.65TERMINIX COMMERCIAL Facilties Maintenance G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
92.90Park Maintenance G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
146.72Rec Center Gen Division G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
1,154.27
139,345.35TEXA TONKA APARTMENTS Texa Tonka TIF G&A
139,345.35
83,400.00THE AXTELL GROUP Public Saftey Aid G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
83,400.00
243.83THE ESTATE OF DUSTIN WILLIS CHAPMAN Water G&A
243.83
2,100.00THE INSTITUTE OF CULTURAL AFFAIRS-USA REI G&A Other Travel, Conv & Conf
2,100.00
981.00THE MN TRANSPORTATION ALLIANCE, INC. Engineering G&A Dues, Memberships, Licenses
981.00
239.32THE MPX GROUP Comm & Marketing G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
239.32
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5a)
Title: Approve city disbursements Page 30
CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK
Council Check Summary
2/23/20261/27/2026 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
2,700.00THE PARK THEATER COMPANY Adminstrative Operations G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
2,700.00
587.44THE SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO Water G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
587.44
804.00THE SIGN PRODUCERS INC Facilties Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
804.00
450.00THE STEPPING STONE GROUP Water G&A
450.00
800.00THE ZARAH Organized Rec G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
800.00
301.50TK ELEVATOR CORPORATION Rec Center Gen Division G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
301.50
480.00T-MOBILE USA INC Police G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
480.00
13.64TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY Water G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
13.64
4,887.43TOTAL MECHANICAL SERVICES, INC.Rec Center Gen Division G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
5,224.11Rec Center Gen Division G&A Repairs and Maintenance
10,111.54
62,426.00TOWMASTERVehicles & Equipment G&A Vehicles/Machinery Purch
62,426.00
12,720.00TRACKER PRODUCTS LLC Police G&A Software Licensing Less 12 Mo
12,720.00
114,274.84TRANSWEST TRUCKS SUPERIOR Vehicles & Equipment G&A Other Cap Equip Purchased
114,274.84
85,308.30TRASH CONTRACORS LLC Solid Waste G&A Yard Waste Utility
85,308.30
18,765.00TREE TRUST Natural Resources G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5a)
Title: Approve city disbursements Page 31
CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK
Council Check Summary
2/23/20261/27/2026 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
18,765.00
341.21TRI-STATE BOBCAT General Fund BS Inventory
341.21
6,129.00TRI-TECH FORENSICS INC Police G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
6,129.00
31,570.00TWIN CITY OUTDOOR SERVICES INC SSD 1 G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
11,185.00SSD 3 G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
42,755.00
300.00TYSLEY TAYLOR Adminstrative Operations G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
300.00
540.00UHL CO INC Park Maintenance G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
540.00
323.88ULINEWater G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
404.08Rec Center Gen Division G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
727.96
850.00ULTIMATE SAFETY CONCEPTS INC Fire Department G&A Repairs and Maintenance
954.78Fire Department G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
1,804.78
252.91UNGS MARK Water G&A
252.91
687.51URBAN WORK City Clerk's Office G&A Refunds/Reimbursements
687.51
7.06VANG FONG Water G&A
7.06
10,000.00VEHICLE RESPONSE TRAINING LLC Fire Department G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
10,000.00
15,303.94VERIZONIT G&A Telephone Communications
15,303.94
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5a)
Title: Approve city disbursements Page 32
CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK
Council Check Summary
2/23/20261/27/2026 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
59,042.57VERTOSOFT LLC IT G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
59,042.57
480.00VETERAN ELECTRIC Facilties Maintenance G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
31,286.61Park Improvement G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
1,600.00Park Maintenance G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
1,740.00Rec Center Gen Division G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
35,106.61
925.12VISTAR-PERFORMANCE FOOD SERVICE Rec Center Gen Division G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
925.12
24.65WARD ANDRA Park Maintenance G&A Employee Mileage Reimbursement
24.65
132.00WARNER'S STELLIAN CO Building and Energy G&A
132.00
593.40WARNING LITES OF MN INC Park Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat
593.40
1,454.24WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE INC Water G&A Repairs and Maintenance
1,454.24
4,355.30WEBB ERICK Climate Investment G&A
4,355.30
56.93WESTPFAHL TYLER Water G&A
56.93
47,163.15WM CORPORATE SERVICES INC Solid Waste G&A Yard Waste Utility
198.27Park Maintenance G&A Solid Waste Utility
47,361.42
7,533.53WOLD ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS Municipal Building & Infra G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
7,533.53
1,727.82WORLD FUEL SERVICES, INC.General Fund BS Inventory
1,727.82
9,027.00WSB ASSOC INC Engineering G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5a)
Title: Approve city disbursements Page 33
CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK
Council Check Summary
2/23/20261/27/2026 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
4,880.25Storm Water Utility G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
13,907.25
21,285.48XCEL ENERGY Facilties Maintenance G&A Electric Utility
14,811.25Public Works G&A Electric Utility
308.13EDA - 4300 36 1/2 G&A Electric Utility
32,109.86Water G&A Electric Utility
1,822.39Water Reilly G&A Electric Utility
6,045.65Sewer G&A Electric Utility
1,947.48Storm Water Utility G&A Electric Utility
289.27Park Maintenance G&A Electric Utility
24,789.97Rec Center Gen Division G&A Electric Utility
103,409.48
2,595.00YOUNG ENV. CONSULTING GROUP, LLC. Storm Water Utility G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv
2,595.00
1,058.64ZIEGLER INC General Fund BS Inventory
1,058.64
Report Totals 20,958,107.75
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5a)
Title: Approve city disbursements Page 34
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: March 2, 2026
Consent agenda item: 5b
Executive summary
Title: Adopt ordinance amending St. Louis Park city code chapter 2 regarding boards and
commissions
Recommended action: Motion to approve the second reading of an ordinance amending
various sections of chapter 2 of the city code related to boards and commissions.
Policy consideration: Does the city council wish to proceed with the ordinance amendments
proposed to the city code chapter 2 regarding boards and commissions?
Summary: Throughout 2025, several amendments to chapter 2 of the St. Louis Park City Code
were brought forward for city council’s consideration. This prompted staff to conduct a
comprehensive review of the chapter to ensure consistent language and alignment across all
sections. While most updates are grammatical or structural in nature and intended to improve
readability or provide clarity, a few notable changes include:
• Removal of purpose sections for the Human Rights Commission and the Environment
and Sustainability Commission. These two commissions were the only advisory bodies
with standalone purpose statements and their powers and duties already sufficiently
describe their purpose. Removing these sections creates consistency across all
commissions.
• Removal of “qualified voter” as a requirement for service on boards and commissions.
This language created an inequitable barrier for residents who are active community
members but not eligible voters. Eliminating this requirement ensures broader and
more inclusive access to civic participation.
The first reading of the ordinance was approved Feb. 17, 2026. If the second reading is
approved an effective date proposed for proposed changes will be March 27, 2026.
Financial or budget considerations: None
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to creating opportunities to build
social capital through community engagement.
Supporting documents: Proposed city code chapter 2 amendments
Prepared by: Pat Coleman, community engagement coordinator
Reviewed by: Cheyenne Brodeen, administrative services director
Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5b) Page 2
Title: Adopt ordinance amending St. Louis Park city code chapter 2 regarding boards and commissions
Discussion
Present considerations:
Several city council members expressed interest in developing clearer purpose statements for
all commissions, noting that the phrase “advisory to council” does not fully describe the unique
role or focus of each body.
Moving forward, staff will continue exploring how clearer, individual board and commission
specific purpose statements could be developed and where they should live outside of the city
code. This process will include:
• The evaluation of current purpose statements and where they currently live (most
recently amended city code language, bylaws and commissions webpages)
• Considering how each board/commission can help shape or refine descriptions that best
reflect their roles and contributions and
• Identifying practical locations for these statements, such as commissions webpages,
orientation materials, and outreach or engagement documents.
Next steps: If the second reading of the ordinance is approved, an effective date proposed for
proposed changes will be March 27, 2026.
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5b) Page 3
Title: Adopt ordinance amending St. Louis Park city code chapter 2 regarding boards and commissions
Ordinance No.____ - 26
Amending St. Louis Park City Code Chapter 2, Article IV to ensure consistent and
standardized language related to boards and commissions
The City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota does ordain:
Section 1. St. Louis Park City Code Chapter 2, Article IV, is hereby amended as follows to delete
the struck-out language and to add the underlined text:
Article IV. Boards, Commissions and Committees
Division 1. Generally
Secs. 2-161--2-180. Reserved.
Division 2. Community Technology Advisory Commission
Sec. 2-181. Membership; terms.
(a) Advisory function; composition. The community technology advisory commission shall be an
advisory commission to the city council. It shall consist of seven (7) regular members and two
(2) youth members and one ex-officio member, all appointed as set forth in this section.
(b) Regular members. All regular members of the commission shall be appointed by the city
council to three-year terms. The terms of regular members shall run until May 31 of the year in
which their terms expire and until a qualified successor is appointed. In the event of a vacancy,
the city council shall may appoint a person to complete the unexpired term. Subsequent
appointments shall be for three-year terms. A member of the commission may be removed
with or without cause by the city council.
(c) Youth members. Youth members shall be appointed by the city council to one-year terms.
Youth members shall have the same voting powers as regular members.
(d) Ex-officio member. One ex-officio member shall be appointed by the cable company which
is granted a franchise by the city. The ex-officio member shall not vote or be counted as part of
the quorum, but shall be present at all meetings.
(d) (e) Qualifications. All Regular members of the commission shall be qualified voters and
residents of the city. Youth members shall be high school students. A vacancy shall be deemed
to exist if a member ceases to meet the residency requirements qualifications set forth in this
section. Youth members shall be high school students of a private or public school located in
the city. All members will be appointed through the application and appointment process
established by the city council.
(e) (f) Term limits. Regular members may serve up to two, three-year consecutive terms on any
board or commission. Members must sit out one full term before re-applying to the community
technology advisory commission.
(Code 1976, § 1-320; Ord. No. 2572-19, 10-7-19; Ord. No. 2603-21, 1-19-21; Ord. No. 2689-25,
3-325; Ord. No. 2695-25, 7-21-25)
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5b) Page 4
Title: Adopt ordinance amending St. Louis Park city code chapter 2 regarding boards and commissions
Sec. 2-182. Organization.
(a) A staff liaison to the community technology advisory commission shall be appointed by the
city manager and shall be subject to the administrative rules and regulations of the city.
(b) The commission shall elect its own chair and vice-chair. Subject to such limitations as may
be imposed by the city council at any time. The community technology advisory commission
shall provide its own rules and procedures, determine the date and time of meetings, and,
upon proper notice, it shall call public hearings when necessary and desirable and in accordance
with all requirements of local, state, and federal laws. The bylaws of the commission and any
amendments of such bylaws shall be submitted to the city council upon their adoption. Such
bylaws and any amendments shall be deemed to be approved by the city council unless the city
council takes action to modify such bylaws or amendments within 30 days after submission. No
member of the commission shall consider or vote upon any question in which the member is
directly or indirectly interested.
(c) The community technology advisory commission shall keep proper records of its
proceedings. Such records shall be maintained by the staff liaison or the liaison's designee.
(Code 1976, § 1-321; Ord. No. 2572-19, 10-7-19)
Sec. 2-183. Stipends and expenses of members.
(a) Stipends. Each of the regular and youth members of the community technology
advisory commission shall receive a stipend of $49/per month.
(b) Expenses of members. The members of the community technology advisory
commission may be reimbursed for actual expenses to the extent that funds therefore are
provided in the annual city budget adopted by the city council. The commission shall properly
account for its receipts and expenditures of monies in accordance with established city
procedures.
(Code 1976, § 1-322; Ord. No. 2572-19, 10-7-19; Ord. No. 2689-25, 3-3-25; Ord. No. 2695-25, 7-
2125)
Sec. 2-184. Powers and duties.
The community technology advisory commission shall have the following powers and duties to:
(1) (a) Advise and collaborate with the city council and boards and commissions on the
application and use of technology for the purpose of improving city services and quality of life
for St. Louis Park’s citizens, businesses and visitors; and
(2) (b) Submit to the city council an annual report of the activities of the commission during the
previous year; and
(3) (c) Perform other functions as needed to carry out these duties and responsibilities as
directed by the city council and to act in an advisory capacity to the city council.
(Code 1976, § 1-323; Ord. No. 2572-19, 10-7-19, Ord. 2603-21, 1-19-21; Ord. No. 2689-25, 3-3-
25; Ord. No. 2695-25, 7-21-25)
Secs. 2-185--2-210. Reserved.
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5b) Page 5
Title: Adopt ordinance amending St. Louis Park city code chapter 2 regarding boards and commissions
Division 3. Human Rights Commission
Sec. 2-211. Purpose.
The purpose of the human rights commission shall be to advise the city council in its
efforts to ensure all citizens protection of their human rights and full and equal opportunity for
participation in the affairs of this community. The city declares, as a matter of public policy, that
it is interested in securing for all of its citizens equal opportunity in housing, employment, public
services, public accommodations and education, and that it is the public policy of the city to assist
the state department of human rights in implementing the Minnesota Human Rights Act (M.S.A.
§ 363.13) by the human rights commission's investigation of complaints, development and
implementation of a program of education and compliance review, and through advising the city
council on long range programs to improve human relations and expand the protection of human
rights in the city.
(Code 1976, § 1-340)
Sec. 2-212 211. Membership; terms.
(a) Advisory function; composition. The human rights commission shall be an advisory
commission to the city council. It shall consist of eight (8) regular members and two (2) youth
members all appointed as set forth in this section.
(b) Regular members. All regular members of the commission, at least one of whom shall be an
attorney, shall be appointed by the city council to three-year terms. The terms of regular
members shall run until May 31 of the year in which their terms expire and until a qualified
successor is appointed. In the event of a vacancy, the city council shall may appoint a person to
complete the unexpired term. Subsequent appointments shall be for three-year terms. A
member of the commission may be removed with or without cause by the city council.
(c) Youth members. Youth members shall be appointed by the city council to one-year terms.
Youth members shall have the same voting power as regular members.
(d) Qualifications. All regular members of the commission shall be qualified voters and
residents of the city. Youth members shall be high school students. A vacancy shall be deemed
to exist if a member ceases to meet the residency requirements qualifications set forth in this
section. Youth members shall be high school students of a private or public school located in
the city. All members will be appointed through the application and appointment process
established by the city council.
(e) Term limits. Regular members may serve up to two, three-year consecutive terms on any
board or commission. Members must sit out one full term before re-applying to the human
rights commission.
(Code 1976, § 1-341; Ord. No. 2403-11, 9-30-2011; Ord. 2603-21, 1-19-21; Ord. No. 2689-25, 3-
325; Ord. No. 2695-25, 7-21-25)
Sec. 2-213 212. Organization.
(a) A staff liaison to the human rights commission shall be appointed by the city manager. The
liaison shall be subject to the administrative rules and regulations of the city.
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5b) Page 6
Title: Adopt ordinance amending St. Louis Park city code chapter 2 regarding boards and commissions
(b) The commission shall elect its own chair and vice-chair. Subject to the limitations as may be
imposed by the city council at any time, the commission shall provide its own rules and
procedure, shall determine the date and time of its meetings, and, upon proper notice, shall call
public hearings when necessary or desirable and in accordance with all requirements of local
and state laws. The bylaws of the commission and any amendments of such bylaws shall be
submitted to the city council upon their adoption. Such bylaws and any amendments shall be
deemed to be approved by the city council unless the city council takes action to modify such
bylaws or amendments within 30 days after submission. No member of the commission shall
consider or vote upon any question in which the member is directly or indirectly interested.
(c) The human rights commission shall keep proper records of its proceedings, and such
records shall be maintained by the staff liaison or the liaison's designee.
(Code 1976, § 1-342)
Sec. 2-214 213. Stipends and expenses of members.
(a) Stipends. Each of the regular and youth members of the human rights commission
shall receive a stipend of $49/per month.
(b) Expenses of members. The members of the human rights commission may be
reimbursed for actual expenses to the extent that funds therefore are provided in the annual
city budget adopted by the city council. The commission shall properly account for its receipts
and expenditures of monies in accordance with established city procedures.
(Code 1976, § 1-343; Ord. No. 2689-25, 3-3-25; Ord. No. 2695-25, 7-21-25)
Sec. 2-215 214. Powers and duties.
The human rights commission shall have the following powers and duties to:
(1) (a) Study and review programs and policies and advise and aid the city council in enlisting
the cooperation of agencies, organizations, and individuals in the city in an active program
directed to create equal opportunity and eliminate discrimination.
(2) Advise and aid the city council in developing and implementing programs of cooperation
with the state department of human rights to fulfill the purposes set out in section 2-211.
(3) (b) Make recommendations to the city council regarding formulation and implementation
of human rights programs for the city. The programs shall be directed toward increasing the
effectiveness and direction of all individuals and agencies of the city through planning,
policymaking and education in the area of human rights.
(4) (c) Advise the city council with respect to human rights issues arising out of or in
connection with the plans or operations of any city department or agency and recommend the
adoption of such specific policies or actions as may be needed to protect human rights in the
city.
(5) (d) Advise and recommend to the city council programs or legislation to eliminate
inequalities of opportunity in the area of human rights.
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5b) Page 7
Title: Adopt ordinance amending St. Louis Park city code chapter 2 regarding boards and commissions
(6) (e) Publish and distribute to the public at large any materials necessary or advisable to carry
out its functions, subject to requirements of the city council.
(7) (f) Make studies, surveys, and investigations necessary or advisable to carry out its
functions.
(8) (g) Sponsor such meetings, institutes, forums and other educational activities as will lead to
clearer understanding of local human rights issues and contribute to their proper resolution.
(9) (h) Submit to the city council an annual report of the activities of the commission during the
previous year.
(b) (i) Perform other functions as needed to carry out these duties and responsibilities as
directed by the city council and to act in an advisory capacity to the city council.The commission
shall have such additional powers and duties as the city council shall from time to time
determine.
(Code 1976, § 1-344; Ord. No. 2689-25, 3-3-25; Ord. No. 2695-25, 7-21-25)
Secs. 2-216 215--2-240. Reserved.
Division 4. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission
Sec. 2-241. Membership; terms.
(a) Advisory function; composition. The parks and recreation advisory commission shall be an
advisory commission to the city council. It shall consist of seven (7) regular members and two
(2) youth members, all appointed as set forth in this section.
(b) Regular members. All regular members of the commission shall be appointed by the city
council to three-year terms. The terms of regular members shall run until May 31 of the year in
which their terms expire and until a qualified successor is duly appointed. In the event of a
vacancy, the city council shall may appoint a person to complete the unexpired term.
Subsequent appointments shall be for three-year terms. A member of the commission may be
removed with or without cause by the city council.
(c) Youth members. Youth members shall be appointed by the city council to one-year terms.
Youth members shall have the same voting power as regular members.
(d) Qualifications. Regular members of the commission shall be qualified voters and residents
of the city. Youth members shall be high school students. A vacancy shall be deemed to exist if
a member ceases to meet the residency requirements qualifications set forth in this section.
Youth members shall be high school students of a private or public school located in the city. All
members will be appointed through the application and appointment process established by
the city council.
(e) Term limits. Regular members may serve up to two, three-year consecutive terms on any
board or commission. Members must sit out one full term before re-applying to the parks and
recreation advisory commission.
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5b) Page 8
Title: Adopt ordinance amending St. Louis Park city code chapter 2 regarding boards and commissions
(Code 1976, § 1-310; Ord. 2603-21, 1-19-21; Ord. No. 2689-25, 3-3-25; Ord. No. 2695-25, 7-21-
25)
Sec. 2-242. Organization.
(a) A staff liaison to the parks and recreation advisory commission shall be appointed by the
city manager and shall be subject to the administrative rules and regulations of the city.
(b) The commission shall elect its own chair and vice-chair. Subject to such limitations as may
be imposed by the city council at any time, the commission shall provide its own rules and
procedure, determine the date and time of meetings and, upon proper notice, shall call public
hearings when necessary and desirable and in accordance with all requirements of local and state
laws. The bylaws of the commission and amendments shall be submitted to the city council upon
their adoption. Such bylaws and any amendments shall be deemed to be approved by the city
council unless the city council takes action to modify such bylaws or amendments within 30 days
after submission. No member of the commission shall consider or vote upon any question in
which the member is directly or indirectly interested.
(c) The commission shall keep proper records of its proceedings, and such records shall be
maintained by the staff liaison or the liaison's designee.
(Code 1976, § 1-311)
Sec. 2-243. Stipends and expense of members.
(a) Stipends. Each of the regular and youth members of the parks and recreation
commission shall receive a stipend of $49/per month.
(b) Expenses of members. The members of the parks and recreation advisory commission
may be reimbursed for actual expenses to the extent that funds therefore are provided in the
annual city budget adopted by the city council. The commission shall properly account for its
receipts and expenditures of monies in accordance with established city procedures.
(Code 1976, § 1-312; Ord. No. 2689-25, 3-3-25; Ord. No. 2695-25, 7-21-25)
Sec. 2-244. Powers and duties.
The parks and recreation advisory commission shall have the following powers and duties to:
(1) (a) Consider matters pertaining to public recreation programs in the city.
(2) (b) Evaluate the city's current parks and recreation programs and desires of citizens for such
services.
(3) (c) Keep acquainted with the current state, regional and national parks and recreation
standards for communities.
(4) (d) Recommend programs and a budget of programs and expenditures for operations of the
parks and recreation department.
(5) (e) Study and recommend long range parks and recreation plans for the city.
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5b) Page 9
Title: Adopt ordinance amending St. Louis Park city code chapter 2 regarding boards and commissions
(6) (f) Submit to the city council an annual report of the activities of the commission during the
previous year.
(7) (g) Act in an advisory capacity to the city council in all matters which are requested by the
city council. Perform other functions as needed to carry out these duties and
responsibilities as directed by the city council and to act in an advisory capacity to the city
council.
Secs. 2-245--2-270. Reserved.
Division 5. Planning Commission
Sec. 2-271. Membership; terms.
(a) Advisory function; composition. The planning commission shall be an advisory commission
to the city council. It shall consist of seven (7) regular members and one (1) youth member, all
appointed as set forth in this section.
(b) Regular members. All regular members of the commission shall be appointed by the city
council to three-year terms. The terms of regular members shall run until May 31 of the year in
which their terms expire and until a qualified successor is duly appointed. In the event of a
vacancy, the city council shall may appoint a person to complete the unexpired term.
Subsequent appointments shall be for three-year terms. A member of the commission may be
removed with or without cause by the city council.
(c) Youth member. A youth member shall be appointed by the city council to a one-year term.
The youth member shall not have voting power.
(d) Qualifications. Regular members of the commission shall be qualified voters and residents
of the city. The youth member shall be a high school student. A vacancy shall be deemed to
exist if a member ceases to meet the residency requirements qualifications set forth in this
section. The youth member shall be a high school student of a private or public school located
in the city. All members will be appointed through the application and appointment process
established by the city council.
(e) Term limits. Regular members may serve up to two, three-year consecutive terms on any
board or commission. Members must sit out one full term before re-applying to the planning
commission.
(Code 1976, § 1-301; Ord. No. 2689-25, 3-3-25; Ord. No. 2695-25, 7-21-25)
Sec. 2-272. Organization.
(a) A staff liaison to the planning commission shall be appointed by the city manager and shall
be subject to the administrative rules and regulations of the city.
(b) The commission shall elect its own chair, vice-chair and secretary. Subject to such
limitations as may be imposed by the city council at any time, the commission shall provide its
own rules and procedure. The date and time of meetings, and, upon proper notice, shall call
public hearings when necessary and desirable and in accordance with all requirements of local
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5b) Page 10
Title: Adopt ordinance amending St. Louis Park city code chapter 2 regarding boards and commissions
and state laws. The bylaws of the commission and any amendments shall be submitted to the
city council upon their adoption. Such bylaws and any amendments shall be deemed to be
approved by the city council unless the city council takes action to modify such bylaws or
amendments within 30 days after submission. No member of the commission shall consider or
vote on any question in which the member is directly or indirectly interested.
(c) The planning commission shall keep proper records of its proceedings, and such records
shall be maintained by the staff liaison or the liaison's designee.
(Code 1976, § 1-302)
Sec. 2-273. Stipends and expenses of members.
(a) Stipends. Each of the regular and youth members of the planning commission shall
receive a stipend of $49/per month.
(b) Expenses of members. The members of the planning commission may be reimbursed for
actual expenses to the extent that funds therefore are provided in the annual city budget
adopted by the city council. The commission shall properly account for its receipts and
expenditures of monies in accordance with established city procedures.
(Code 1976, § 1-303; Ord. No. 2689-25, 3-3-25; Ord. No. 2695-25, 7-21-25)
Sec. 2-274. Powers and duties.
The planning commission shall have the following powers and duties to:
(1) (a) Prepare a comprehensive plan for the future development of the city to be submitted to
the city council for implementation and to maintain such plan and recommend its amendment
to the city council as may become necessary.
(2) (b) Initiate, direct and review, from time to time, a study of the provisions of the zoning
chapter and the subdivision regulations and to report to the city council its advice and
recommendations accordingly.
(3) (c) Study applications and proposals for amendments to the zoning chapter and
applications for special permits and to advise the city council of its recommendations.
(4) (d) Study preliminary and final plats and to advise the city council of its recommendations.
(5) (e) Submit to the city council an annual report of the activities of the commission during the
previous year.
(6) (f) Act in an advisory capacity to the city council in all matters wherein powers are assigned
to the city council by state law or city charter concerning land use, comprehensive planning,
zoning, platting, changes in streets and other matters of a general planning nature.
(Code 1976, § 1-304)
Secs. 2-275--2-300. Reserved.
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5b) Page 11
Title: Adopt ordinance amending St. Louis Park city code chapter 2 regarding boards and commissions
Division 6. Board of Zoning Appeals
Sec. 2-301. Membership; terms.
(a) Composition. The board of zoning appeals shall consist of all individuals appointed to and
serving on the planning commission pursuant to the requirements set forth in Article IV, Division
5, section 2-271 of this chapter. Only regular members of the planning commission shall serve as
voting members of the board of zoning appeals. (Ord. No. 2559-19, 5-6-19)
(b) Regular members. The five (5) regular members of the board shall be appointed by the
city council for three-year terms. The terms of regular members shall expire on May 31 of the
third year of such term and until a successor is duly appointed and qualified. Subsequent
appointments shall be for three- year terms. In the event of a vacancy, the council shall appoint
a person to complete the unexpired term. A member of the board may be removed with or
without cause by the city council.
(c) Qualifications. Members of the board shall be qualified voters and residents of the
city. A vacancy shall be deemed to exist in case a member ceases to meet the residency
requirements. The regular members of the board shall be appointed from persons who have
demonstrated an interest in the board of zoning appeals by submission of appropriate city
forms.
(d) Term limits. Regular members of the board may serve up to two, three-year
consecutive terms on any board or commission. Members must sit out one full term before re-
applying to the zoning board of appeals.
(Code 1976, § 1-401; Ord. No. 2689-25, 3-3-25)
Sec. 2-302. Organization.
(a) A staff liaison to the board of zoning appeals shall be appointed by the city manager and
shall be subject to the administrative rules and regulations of the city.
(b) The board shall elect its own chair and vice-chair. Subject to such limitations as may be
imposed by the city council at any time, the board shall provide its own rules and procedure,
determine the date and time of meetings and, upon proper notice, shall conduct all public
hearings when necessary and desirable and in accordance with all requirements of local and
state laws. The bylaws of the board and any amendments shall be submitted to the city council
upon their adoption. Such bylaws and any amendments shall be deemed to be approved by the
city council unless the city council takes action to modify such bylaws or amendments within 30
days after submission. No member of the board shall consider or vote upon any question in
which the member is directly or indirectly interested.
(c) The board of zoning appeals shall keep proper records of its proceedings, and such records
shall be maintained by the staff liaison or the liaison's designee.
(Code 1976, § 1-402)
Sec. 2-303. Stipends and expenses of members.
(a) Stipends. Each of the five regular members of the board of zoning appeals shall receive
a stipend of $49/per month. Members of the board of zoning appeals shall receive the stipend
as provided by Sec. 2-273 of this chapter.
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5b) Page 12
Title: Adopt ordinance amending St. Louis Park city code chapter 2 regarding boards and commissions
(b) Expenses of members. The members of the board of zoning appeals may be reimbursed
for actual expenses to the extent that funds therefore are provided in the annual city budget
adopted by the city council. The board shall properly account for its receipts and expenditures
of monies in accordance with established city procedures.
(Code 1976, § 1-403; Ord. No. 2689-25, 3-3-25)
Sec. 2-304. Powers and duties.
The board of zoning appeals shall have the following powers and duties to:
(1) (a) Hear and decide on appeals from any order, requirement, permit decision or refusal or
determination made by the zoning administrator under the zoning chapter and from any
interpretation of the text of the zoning chapter, or any location of the boundary of a zoning
district as shown on the official zoning map made by the zoning administrator, in accordance
with all requirements of local and state laws.
(2) (b) Hear and decide on requests for variances from the terms of the zoning chapter in the
manner and subject to the standards and requirements set forth in the zoning chapter and
applicable state laws.
(3) (c) Communicate with the city council its recommendations, records of proceedings and
any other method of reporting as may be deemed appropriate by the city council.
(4) (d) Act in an advisory capacity to the city council and hear and make recommendations to
the city council on all matters referred to the board or upon which it is required to act under
the zoning chapter.
(5) (e) Submit to the city council an annual report of the activities of the commission
during the previous year.
(Code 1976, § 1-404; Ord. No. 2689-25, 3-3-25)
Sec. 2-305. Decision subject to appeal to the city council.
Any party aggrieved by a decision of the board of zoning appeals may appeal the decision to the
city council in accordance with the procedures set forth in the zoning chapter of this Code. An
appeal shall be filed with the planning department within ten days of issuance of the board of
zoning appeals' decision.
(Code 1976, § 1-405)
Secs. 2-306--2-320. Reserved.
Division 7. Police Advisory Commission
Sec. 2-321. Membership; terms.
(a) Advisory function; composition. The police advisory commission shall be an advisory
commission to the city council. It shall consist of eleven (11) regular members and two (2)
youth members, all appointed as set forth in this section.
(b) Regular members. Eleven Regular members shall be appointed by the city council for to
three-year terms. The terms of regular members which shall expire on run until May 31 of the
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5b) Page 13
Title: Adopt ordinance amending St. Louis Park city code chapter 2 regarding boards and commissions
third year of such term year in which their terms expire and until a qualified successor is duly
appointed and qualified. In the event of a vacancy, the city council shall may appoint a person
to complete the unexpired term. Subsequent appointments shall be fore three-year terms. A
member of the commission may be removed with or without cause by the city council.
(c) Youth members. Youth members shall be appointed by the city council to one-year terms.
Youth members shall have the same voting power as regular members. Two voting youth
members, who shall be high school students of a private or public school located in the city,
may be appointed by the city council and serve a term of one year.
(d) Qualifications. Regular members of the police advisory commission shall be qualified voters
and residents of the city. Youth members shall be high school students. A vacancy shall be
deemed to exist if a member ceases to meet the residency requirements qualifications set forth
in this section. All members of the commission shall will be appointed from persons who have
demonstrated an interest in the police advisory commission by submission of appropriate city
forms through the application and appointment process established by the city council.
(e) Term limits. Regular members of the police advisory commission may serve up to two,
three-year consecutive terms on any board or commission. Members must sit out one full term
before re-applying to the police advisory commission.
(Ord. 2603-21, 1-19-21; Ord. No. 2689-25, 3-3-25)
Sec. 2-322. Organization.
(a) A staff liaison to the police advisory commission shall be appointed by the city
manager and shall be subject to the administrative rules and regulations of the city.
(b) The commission shall elect its own chair and vice-chair. Subject to such limitations as may
be imposed by the city council at any time, the commission shall provide its own rules and
procedure, determine the date and time of meetings and, upon proper notice, shall call public
hearings when necessary and desirable and in accordance with all requirements of local and
state laws. The bylaws of the commission and amendments shall be submitted to the city
council upon their adoption. Such bylaws and any amendments shall be deemed to be
approved by the city council unless the city council takes action to modify such bylaws or
amendments within 30 days after submission. No member of the commission shall consider or
vote upon any question in which the member is directly or indirectly interested.
(c) The commission shall keep proper records of its proceedings, and such records shall be
maintained by the staff liaison or the liaison's designee.
Sec. 2-323. Stipends and expense of members.
(a) Stipends. Each of the eleven regular and the two youth members of the police advisory
commission shall receive a stipend of $49/per month.
(b) Expenses of members. The members of the police advisory commission may be
reimbursed for actual expenses to the extent that funds therefore are provided in the annual
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5b) Page 14
Title: Adopt ordinance amending St. Louis Park city code chapter 2 regarding boards and commissions
city budget adopted by the city council. The board shall properly account for its receipts and
expenditures of monies in accordance with established city procedures.
(Ord. No. 2689-25, 3-3-25)
Sec. 2-324. Powers and duties.
Under the direction of the city council, The police advisory commission shall have the following
powers perform those functions and duties necessary to:
(a) Carry out their stated mission to enhance the awareness of police department capabilities
and services; provide an opportunity for citizen involvement in police services and to encourage
exchange between the police department and the community.
(b) Submit to the city council an annual report of the activities of the commission during the
previous year; and
(c) Perform other functions as needed to carry out these duties and responsibilities as directed
by the city council and to act in an advisory capacity to the city council.
(Ordinance No. 2242-03, 7-21-03; Ord. No. 2689-25, 3-3-25)
Sec. 2-325—2-330. Reserved.
Division 8. Environment and Sustainability Commission
Sec. 2-331. Purpose.
The purpose of the Environment and Sustainability Commission shall be to:
(a) Provide recommendations to advance city goals, policies, and programs.
(b) Provide advice and assistance to staff and council through collaboration.
(c) Provide leadership in engaging the community, encouraging relationships and
partnerships with neighborhoods, special interest groups, religious institutions, business
leaders, and other commissions.
(d) Serve as a conduit for environmental and sustainable information, topics, and direction
to and from residents and the public.
(Ord. No. 2689-25, 3-3-25)
Sec. 2-332 331. Membership; terms.
(a) The environment and sustainability commission shall be an advisory commission to the
city council. It shall consist of eleven (11) regular members and two (2) youth members, all
appointed as set forth in this section.
(b) Regular members. Eleven Regular members shall be appointed by the city council for
three-year terms that shall expire on May 31 of the third year in which their terms expire of
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5b) Page 15
Title: Adopt ordinance amending St. Louis Park city code chapter 2 regarding boards and commissions
such term and until a qualified successor is duly appointed and qualified. The city council should
ensure representation from each city ward, as outlined in Chapter 10 of this code. The city
council will also give preference to applicants representing the business and rental communities
in order to ensure fair representation on the commission. In the event of a vacancy, the city
council shall may appoint a person to complete the unexpired term. Subsequent appointments
shall be for three-year terms. A member of the commission may be removed with or without
cause by the city council.
(c) Youth members. Youth members shall be appointed by the city council to one-year
terms. Youth members shall have the same voting power as regular members. Two voting
youth members, who shall be high school students of a private or public school located in the
city, may be appointed by the city council and serve a term of one year.
(d) Qualifications. Regular members of the Environment and Sustainability commission
shall be qualified voters and residents of the city. Youth members shall be high school students.
except in the case of a business owner or representative. A business owner or representative
need not be a resident of the city. A vacancy shall be deemed to exist if a member ceases to
meet the residency requirements set forth in this section. All members of the commission shall
will be appointed through the application and appointment process established by the city
council. from persons who have demonstrated an interest in the commission by submission of
appropriate city forms and exhibit high energy, leadership, and a commitment to the
environment and sustainability.
(e) Term limits. Regular members of the environment and sustainability commission may
serve up to two, three-year consecutive terms on any board or commission. Members must sit
out one full term before re-applying to the environment and sustainability commission.
(Ord. No. 2537-18, 6-4-18; Ord. 2603-21, 1-19-21; Ord. No. 2689-25, 3-3-25)
Sec. 2-333 332. Organization.
(a) A staff liaison to the environment and sustainability commission shall be appointed by
the city manager and shall be subject to the administrative rules and regulations of the city.
(b) The commission shall elect its own chair and vice-chair. Subject to such limitations as
may be imposed by the city council at any time, the commission shall provide its own rules and
procedure, determine the date and time of meetings and, upon proper notice, shall call public
hearings when necessary and desirable and in accordance with all requirements of local and
state laws. The bylaws of the commission and amendments shall be submitted to the city
council upon their adoption. Such laws and any amendments shall be deemed to be approved
by the city council unless the city council takes action to modify such bylaws or amendments
within 30 days after submission. No member of the commission shall consider or vote upon any
question in which the member is directly or indirectly interested.
(c) The commission shall include any number of working groups focused on identified
special topics or projects and be led by at least one commissioner.
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5b) Page 16
Title: Adopt ordinance amending St. Louis Park city code chapter 2 regarding boards and commissions
(d) (c) The commission shall keep proper records of its proceedings, and such records shall be
maintained by the staff liaison or the liaison’s designees.
Sec. 2-334 333. Stipends and expenses of members.
(a) Stipends. Each of the eleven regular and the two youth members of the environment
and sustainability commission shall receive a stipend of $49/per month.
(b) Expenses of members. The members of the environment and sustainability commission
may be reimbursed for actual expenses to the extent that funds therefore are provided in the
annual city budget adopted by the city council. The board shall properly account for its receipts
and expenditures of monies in accordance with established city procedures.
(Ord. No. 2689-25, 3-3-25)
Sec. 2-335 334. Powers and duties.
The environment and sustainability commission shall have the following powers and duties to:
(1) (a) Advise the city council with respect to environment and sustainability issues
arising out of or in connection with the plans or operations of any city department or agency
and recommend the adoption of such specific policies or actions as may be needed to enhance
the city’s environmental stewardship.
(2) (b) Elicit community feedback and direction, including direct engagement, social
media, annual events and fairs, etc.
(3) (c) Reach out to the full community as well as to special populations with
communication and educational efforts related to the environment and sustainability.
(4) (d) Establish work groups to focus on specific areas of interest, special projects, and
ongoing concerns. Work group representation should be broadened to emphasize greater
diversity, inclusiveness, and specific issue expertise with non-commission members from the
general community.
(5) (e) Submit to the city council an annual report of the activities of the commission
during the previous year.
(f) The commission shall have such additional powers and duties as the city council shall
from time to time determine. Perform other functions as needed to carry out these duties and
responsibilities as directed by the city council and to act in an advisory capacity to the city
council.
(Ordinance No. 2438-13, 4-1-13; Ord. No. 26825, 3-3-25)
Sec. 2-336 335 --2-349. Reserved.
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5b) Page 17
Title: Adopt ordinance amending St. Louis Park city code chapter 2 regarding boards and commissions
Section 2. Effective date and term. This ordinance shall take effect 15 days after publication
according to law.
Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council March 2, 2026:
___________________________________ _________________________________
Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor
Attest: Approved as to form and execution:
____________________________________ _____________________________________
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Soren M. Mattick, city attorney
First Reading February 17, 2026
Second Reading March 2, 2026
Date of publication March 12, 2026
Date ordinance takes effect March 27, 2026
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5b) Page 18
Title: Adopt ordinance amending St. Louis Park city code chapter 2 regarding boards and commissions
SUMMARY FOR PUBLICATION
Ordinance No. ___-26
Amending Various Sections of Chapter 2 and Article IV to ensure
standardizing language related to boards and commissions
This ordinance amends various sections of Chapter 2 and Article IV of the St. Louis Park City
Code related to boards and commissions. Most of the amendments include changes that are
grammatical or structural and intended to improve readability or provide clarity. More notable
changes to the code include the removal of purpose sections for the Human Rights
Commission and the Environment and Sustainability commission, the removal of “qualified
voter” as a requirement for service on boards and commissions, and lastly changes that
streamlines the Board of Zoning Appeals membership section by removing language that
duplicated Planning commission requirements, as the members of this board function as an
extension of the Planning Commission.
The ordinance shall take effect March 27, 2026.
Adopted by the city council March 2, 2026
Nadia Mohamed /s/
Mayor
A copy of the full text of this ordinance is available for inspection with the city clerk.
Published in the St. Louis Park Sun Sailor: March 12, 2026
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: March 2, 2026
Consent agenda item: 5c
Executive summary
Title: Approve Human Rights Commissions and Community Technology Advisory Commission
workplan additions
Recommended action: Motion to approve board and commissions workplan item additions.
Policy consideration: Not at this time.
Summary: In the winter of 2025, the city council approved a communication tool that allows
boards and commissions to communicate directly with the council. One use of this tool is to
submit requests for adding new items to existing workplans.
Following the study session on Feb. 17, 2026, the proposed workplan additions from the
Community Technology Advisory Commission and the Human Rights Commission have been
advanced to the consent agenda for the council’s consideration.
Financial or budget considerations: Not applicable.
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to creating opportunities to build
social capital through community engagement.
Supporting documents:
Human rights commission advisory communication form and workplan draft
Community technology advisory commission advisory communication form and workplan draft
Prepared by: Pat Coleman, community engagement coordinator
Reviewed by: Cheyenne Brodeen, administrative services director
Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5c) Page 2
Title: Approve Human Rights Commissions and Community Technology Advisory Commission workplan additions
Discussion
Background:
In recent years, it became clear that the city needed a more consistent and intentional
approach to developing board and commission workplans. Workplans were traditionally
created once a year, often with limited city council involvement, and there were few
opportunities for mid-year adjustments. This contributed to uncertainty among some
commissions about their purpose, priorities and connection to council direction.
To strengthen alignment and improve communication, the council committed to taking a more
active role in how workplans are shaped and updated. A council–staff workgroup met in early
2025 to review current practices, identify gaps and establish clearer expectations for how
boards and commissions interact with the council throughout the year. These discussions
informed the recommendations presented at the study session on Feb, 3, 2025.
As a result, the council adopted a new workplan process for 2025 and beyond. Under this
updated approach, workplans are treated as living documents that can be amended at any time
rather than created only once at the start or end of the year. To support this flexibility, an
advisory communication tool was created to allow boards and commissions to submit proposed
workplan changes directly to the council, through their staff liaison. This enables ongoing
communication and ensures the council can actively shape and approve workplan updates
throughout the year.
Following this adoption, boards and commissions prepared workplans that were approved on
Feb. 18, 2025. Following that approval, each commission participated in a scheduled check-in
with the council to review progress, discuss any completed or ongoing items and identify areas
where updates might be needed. These check-ins created space for commissions to revisit their
approved workplans and consider whether new items should be added.
Present considerations:
Today’s consent item to approve workplan additions is an opportunity to utilize this new
process adjustment as both the Community Technology Advisory Commission and the Human
Rights Commission have developed new workplan items they are now bringing forward for
council approval. Each commission’s workplan can include up to five items in total, which may
be a mix of completed items, ongoing annual work and new proposals requiring council
approval.
For the Community Technology Advisory Commission, items #1, #2 and #3 are existing
workplan items that have seen significant progress since their February 2025 approval and their
April 2025 check-in with council. Updates on these items are included in the liaison comments
section of their workplan. The new items the commission is requesting approval for - items #4
and #5 - would be added to the workplan once approved.
The Human Rights Commission followed a similar process but reached a different point in their
work. By the time of their September 2025 check-in with council, they had completed most of
their previously approved workplan items. As they developed new items for 2026, the
completed items rolled off the workplan. The commission is now seeking approval for items #2,
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5c) Page 3
Title: Approve Human Rights Commissions and Community Technology Advisory Commission workplan additions
#3 and #4. Item #1 represents an ongoing annual responsibility that will continue unless
otherwise directed.
Next steps:
The human rights commission and the community technology advisory commission will take
approved additional workplan items and begin to carry out those initiatives in 2026. These
workplans will be revisited during scheduled boards and commission check-in meetings
throughout 2026.
Board and Commission
Annual work plan
Presented to council: March 2, 2026
Approved by council:
1
2026 Human Rights Commission Workplan
1
Initiative name: Human Rights Award
Initiative type:
☒Staff support (review project,
policy or program and provide
feedback)
☐Independent research project
☒Gather community feedback
☐Lead community event
Initiative origin:
☐Applicant-initiated
☐Staff-initiated
☐Commission-initiated
☒Council-initiated
Legally required (e.g. response to
Legislative changes or Judicial decisions)?
☐Yes
☒No
Commissioner lead(s) name(s):
All members will participate.
If joint commission initiative, list other board or commission:
Is this an established work group?
☐Yes
☒No
Initiative description:
Together with city staff, the HRC will lead the Human Rights Award by setting guidelines, sharing information, reviewing entries, and presenting the
award.
Strategic Priority: ☐ 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☒ 5 ☐ N/A
Deliverable: ☐ Research report ☒ Summary of community input ☐ Other ☒ N/A
Target completion date: Ongoing, yearly initiative
This section to be completed by staff:
Council request (if applicable): ☐ Review and comment or reply ☐ Review and decide ☒ Informational only – no response needed
Budget required: Funding for award purchase
Staff support required: Staff liaison, communications department
Liaison comments: Nominations for the 2025 Human Rights Awards opened January 5, 2026 and close February 28, 2026. The
commission will review applications in March of 2026, and present the award to it’s winner in April of 2026.
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5c)
Title: Approve Human Rights Commissions and Community Technology Advisory Commission workplan additions Page 3
2
2
Initiative name: Support REI related projects and initiatives
Initiative type:
☒Staff support (review project,
policy or program and provide
feedback)
☐Independent research project
☐Gather community feedback
☐Lead community event
Initiative origin:
☐Applicant-initiated
☒Staff-initiated
☐Commission-initiated
☐Council-initiated
Legally required (e.g. response to
Legislative changes or Judicial decisions)?
☐Yes
☒No
Commissioner lead(s) name(s):
All members will participate.
If joint commission initiative, list other board or commission:
Is this an established work group?
☐Yes
☐No
Initiative description:
The HRC will support city staff as needed by reviewing projects and policies and offering feedback to ensure successful outcomes.
Strategic Priority: ☐ 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☒ 5 ☐ N/A
Deliverable: ☐ Research report ☒ Summary of community input ☐ Other ☒ N/A
Target completion date: Ongoing
This section to be completed by staff:
Council request (if applicable): ☐ Review and comment or reply ☐ Review and decide ☒ Informational only – no response needed
Budget required: None
Staff support required: Communication from staff liaison about opportunities for involvement in various projects and initiatives
Liaison comments: Commissioners have been made aware that there are multiple projects on the horizon where their involvement will be
necessary.
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5c)
Title: Approve Human Rights Commissions and Community Technology Advisory Commission workplan additions Page 4
3
3
Initiative name: Golden Valley Pride Festival Partnership
Initiative type:
☒Staff support (review project,
policy or program and provide
feedback)
☐Independent research project
☐Gather community feedback
☐Lead community event
Initiative origin:
☐Applicant-initiated
☐Staff-initiated
☒Commission-initiated
☐Council-initiated
Legally required (e.g. response to
Legislative changes or Judicial decisions)?
☐Yes
☒No
Commissioner lead(s) name(s):
All members will participate.
If joint commission initiative, list other board or commission:
Is this an established work group?
☐Yes
☒No
Initiative description:
In partnership with Golden Valley and the REI division, the HRC will continue to support their ongoing efforts to a successful Pride Event.
Strategic Priority: ☐ 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☒ 5 ☐ N/A
Deliverable: ☐ Research report ☒ Summary of community input ☐ Other ☒ N/A
Target completion date:
This section to be completed by staff:
Council request (if applicable): ☐ Review and comment or reply ☐ Review and decide ☒ Informational only – no response needed
Budget required: None
Staff support required: Communication from staff liaison on what is needed to help execute the event.
Liaison comments: With the REI division as the lead of the partnership, there has been conversation as the planning of the Golden Valley
Pride Festival is on the horizon that will be communicated with HRC members as it moves forward.
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5c)
Title: Approve Human Rights Commissions and Community Technology Advisory Commission workplan additions Page 5
4
4
Initiative name: HRC Awareness
Initiative type:
☐Staff support (review project,
policy or program and provide
feedback)
☐Independent research project
☒Gather community feedback
☐Lead community event
Initiative origin:
☐Applicant-initiated
☐Staff-initiated
☒Commission-initiated
☐Council-initiated
Legally required (e.g. response to
Legislative changes or Judicial decisions)?
☐Yes
☐No
Commissioner lead(s) name(s):
All members will participate
If joint commission initiative, list other board or commission:
Is this an established work group?
☐Yes
☒No
Initiative description:
This initiative focuses on strengthening the commission’s visibility and building deeper connections within the community.
Strategic Priority: ☐ 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☒ 5 ☐ N/A
Deliverable: ☐ Research report ☒ Summary of community input ☐ Other ☒ N/A
Target completion date:
This section to be completed by staff:
Council request (if applicable): ☐ Review and comment or reply ☐ Review and decide ☒ Informational only – no response needed
Budget required: None
Staff support required: Communication from staff liaison to share opportunities to spread awareness of the commission.
Liaison comments: Commissioners have been exploring opportunities to spread more awareness about commissions, specifically their
own. There has been discussion around old opportunities to spread awareness and how to transition those into 2026.
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5c)
Title: Approve Human Rights Commissions and Community Technology Advisory Commission workplan additions Page 6
5
Initiative Origin Definitions
Applicant-initiated – Project initiated by 3rd party (statutory boards)
Staff-initiated – Project initiated by staff liaison or other city staff
Commission-initiated – Project initiated by the board or commission
Council-initiated – Project tasked to a board or commission by the city council
Strategic Priorities
1.St. Louis Park is committed to being a leader in racial equity and inclusion in order to create a more just and inclusive community for all.
2.St. Louis Park is committed to continue to lead in environmental stewardship.
3.St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of housing and neighborhood oriented development.
4.St. Louis Park is committed to providing a variety of options for people to make their way around the city comfortably, safely and
reliably.
5.St. Louis Park is committed to creating opportunities to build social capital through community engagement
Modifications
Work plans may be modified, to add or delete items, in one of three ways:
Work plans can be modified by mutual agreement during a joint work session.
If immediate approval is important, the board or commission can work with their staff liaison to present a modified work plan for city
council approval at a council meeting.
The city council can direct a change to the work plan at their discretion.
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5c)
Title: Approve Human Rights Commissions and Community Technology Advisory Commission workplan additions Page ϳ
Board and Commission
Annual work plan
Presented to council: March 2, 2026
Approved by council:
1
2025-2026 work plan │ Community Technology Advisory Commission
1
Initiative name: Support citywide Vision 4.0 process
Initiative type:
☒Staff support (review project,
policy or program and provide
feedback)
☐Independent research project
☐Gather community feedback
☐Lead community event
Initiative origin:
☐Applicant-initiated
☒Staff-initiated
☐Commission-initiated
☐Council-initiated
Legally required (e.g. response to
Legislative changes or Judicial decisions)?
☐Yes
☒No
Commissioner lead(s) name(s):
None, all will be involved.
If joint commission initiative, list other board or commission:
Is this an established work group?
☐Yes
☒No
Initiative description: Support the citywide Vision 4.0 process by participating directly and/or encouraging others to participate, and by
sharing information with other community members about the process.
Strategic Priority: ☐ 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☒ 5 ☐ N/A
Deliverable: ☐ Research report ☐ Summary of community input ☒ Other ☐ N/A
Target completion date: 3Q 2025
This section to be completed by staff:
Council request (if applicable): ☐ Review and comment or reply ☐ Review and decide ☒ Informational only – no response needed
Budget required: None
Staff support required: Communication from staff liaison about opportunities with Vision 4.0
Liaison comments: Plan to keep the commission informed about opportunities to assist with the citywide Vision 4.0 process.
Commission members received information from the community engagement coordinator throughout the Vision 4.0 process,
including invites to participate in surveys and to host community meetings.
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5c)
Title: Approve Human Rights Commissions and Community Technology Advisory Commission workplan additions Page ϴ
2
Commission member Benjamin Straus hosted a community meeting at his apartment complex.
Commission members reviewed the Dec. 8, 2025, Vision 4.0 council report presented to the city council, to inform CTAC
additional workplan goals for 2026.
2
Initiative name: Participate in city website redesign review process
Initiative type:
☒Staff support (review project,
policy or program and provide
feedback)
☐Independent research project
☐Gather community feedback
☐Lead community event
Initiative origin:
☐Applicant-initiated
☒Staff-initiated
☐Commission-initiated
☐Council-initiated
Legally required (e.g. response to
Legislative changes or Judicial decisions)?
☐Yes
☒No
Commissioner lead(s) name(s):
None, all members or a small group will be involved.
If joint commission initiative, list other board or commission:
Is this an established work group?
☐Yes
☒No
Initiative description: While the exact process for the redesign has yet to be determined, we plan to draw on the expertise of the CTAC by
involving members, or a small group of members, in potential user group testing or other review of a draft redesign of the city website.
Strategic Priority: ☒ 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☒ 5 ☐ N/A
Deliverable: ☐ Research report ☐ Summary of community input ☒ Other ☐ N/A
Target completion date: 3Q 2025
This section to be completed by staff:
Council request (if applicable): ☐ Review and comment or reply ☐ Review and decide ☒ Informational only – no response needed
Budget required: None
Staff support required: Staff liaison
Liaison comments: The primary goals of the redesign are to ensure compliance with upcoming ADA requirements, ensure mobile
accessibility and improve search function. CTAC will be asked to focus on these items in its review.
CTAC members Konnor Slaats and Kayla Stautz each participated in one of two user experience workshops Sept. 9 and 11, both
two hours each. Both were provided with recordings of the workshop they didn’t attend, and provided comments on user
feedback, as well as suggested wireframe and design elements.
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5c)
Title: Approve Human Rights Commissions and Community Technology Advisory Commission workplan additions Page ϵ
3
3
Initiative name: Stay informed about pending legislation affecting cable and technology
Initiative type:
☒Staff support (review project,
policy or program and provide
feedback)
☐Independent research project
☐Gather community feedback
☐Lead community event
Initiative origin:
☐Applicant-initiated
☒Staff-initiated
☐Commission-initiated
☐Council-initiated
Legally required (e.g. response to
Legislative changes or Judicial decisions)?
☐Yes
☒No
Commissioner lead(s) name(s):
None, all will be involved
If joint commission initiative, list other board or commission:
Is this an established work group?
☐Yes
☒No
Initiative description: CTAC is asked to stay informed about pending legislation that may affect the city’s cable franchise, or other
technologies vital to the community such as broadband.
Strategic Priority: ☐ 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☒ 5 ☐ N/A
Deliverable: ☐ Research report ☒ Summary of community input ☐ Other ☒ N/A
Target completion date: Ongoing
This section to be completed by staff:
Council request (if applicable): ☐ Review and comment or reply ☐ Review and decide ☒ Informational only – no response needed
Budget required: None
Staff support required: Information and updates from staff liaison
Liaison comments: Staff liaison will stay informed of pending legislation through contact with state and national advocacy organizations,
as well as through the city’s legislative staff and lobbyists. Information affecting cable and technology will be shared with CTAC members.
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5c)
Title: Approve Human Rights Commissions and Community Technology Advisory Commission workplan additions Page 1Ϭ
4
4
Initiative name: Whitepaper – Future of Generative AI for Cities
Initiative type:
☐Staff support (review project,
policy or program and provide
feedback)
☒Independent research project
☐Gather community feedback
☐Lead community event
Initiative origin:
☐Applicant-initiated
☐Staff-initiated
☒Commission-initiated
☐Council-initiated
Legally required (e.g. response to
Legislative changes or Judicial decisions)?
☐Yes
☒No
Commissioner lead(s) name(s):
Konnor Slaats, Kayla Stautz, Benjamin Straus
If joint commission initiative, list other board or commission:
Is this an established work group?
☐Yes
☒No
Initiative description: This is a proposed whitepaper seeking to explore the question: how might cities need to adapt to be generative
artificial intelligence (AI)-compatible in the future? The whitepaper will explore policy adaptations cities, including St. Louis Park, may
need to make in a generative AI-enabled future. Peer cities and use cases for generative AI tech will be explored in areas such as
public works, public-facing chatbots, planning and zoning, external resources and coalitions, and public engagement.
Strategic Priority: ☐ 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ 5 ☐ N/A
Deliverable: ☒ Research report ☐ Summary of community input ☐ Other ☒ N/A
Target completion date: Q3 2026
This section to be completed by staff:
Council request (if applicable): ☐ Review and comment or reply ☐ Review and decide ☒ Informational only – no response needed
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5c)
Title: Approve Human Rights Commissions and Community Technology Advisory Commission workplan additions Page 1ϭ
5
Budget required:
Staff support required:
Liaison comments: CTAC has reviewed the generative AI guidelines generated in November 2024 for city staff, and is aware of the data
assessment project conducted in 2025 to move the city toward the goal of having reliable, organized data to “feed” any future
generative AI project. Data cleanup will continue in 2026.
5
Initiative name: mystlouispark (city customer response management system) assessment
Initiative type:
☐Staff support (review project,
policy or program and provide
feedback)
☒Independent research project
☐Gather community feedback
☐Lead community event
Initiative origin:
☐Applicant-initiated
☐Staff-initiated
☒Commission-initiated
☐Council-initiated
Legally required (e.g. response to
Legislative changes or Judicial decisions)?
☐Yes
☒No
Commissioner lead(s) name(s):
Rudyard Dyer, Shane Leverenz, Tom Marble (school district staff
liaison)
If joint commission initiative, list other board or commission:
Is this an established work group?
☐Yes
☒No
Initiative description: The commission team members will conduct an assessment and review of the current MySLP app. We will
document the current feature set, capabilities, accessibility (language options), and integrations. Research will be conducted on
industry best practices and peer municipality apps to determine if there are any opportunities to expand, further integrate, or modify
the existing MySLP app in any way to provide more or better benefits to residents. We will also examine whether the MySLP app is
even necessary. The end deliverable will be a report outlining the current condition and capabilities of MySLP with recommendations
for any changes, enhancements, or modifications to the platform.
Strategic Priority: ☐ 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☒ 5 ☐ N/A
Deliverable: ☒ Research report ☐ Summary of community input ☐ Other ☒ N/A
Target completion date:
This section to be completed by staff:
Council request (if applicable): ☐ Review and comment or reply ☐ Review and decide ☒ Informational only – no response needed
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5c)
Title: Approve Human Rights Commissions and Community Technology Advisory Commission workplan additions Page ϭϮ
6
Budget required:
Staff support required:
Liaison comments: City staff are currently evaluating this product for compatibility with other software being used in the city for
tracking work requests internally, in an attempt to eliminate duplicate efforts.
Initiative Origin Definitions
Applicant-initiated – Project initiated by 3rd party (statutory boards)
Staff-initiated – Project initiated by staff liaison or other city staff
Commission-initiated – Project initiated by the board or commission
Council-initiated – Project tasked to a board or commission by the city council
Strategic Priorities
1.St. Louis Park is committed to being a leader in racial equity and inclusion in order to create a more just and inclusive community for all.
2.St. Louis Park is committed to continue to lead in environmental stewardship.
3.St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of housing and neighborhood oriented development.
4.St. Louis Park is committed to providing a variety of options for people to make their way around the city comfortably, safely and
reliably.
5.St. Louis Park is committed to creating opportunities to build social capital through community engagement
Modifications
Work plans may be modified, to add or delete items, in one of three ways:
Work plans can be modified by mutual agreement during a joint work session.
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5c)
Title: Approve Human Rights Commissions and Community Technology Advisory Commission workplan additions Page 1ϯ
7
If immediate approval is important, the board or commission can work with their staff liaison to present a modified work plan for city
council approval at a council meeting.
The city council can direct a change to the work plan at their discretion.
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5c)
Title: Approve Human Rights Commissions and Community Technology Advisory Commission workplan additions Page 1ϰ
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: March 2, 2026
Consent agenda item: 5d
Executive summary
Title: Approve amendment to 2026 social services award for St. Louis Park Emergency Program
(STEP)
Recommended action: Approval of the proposed amendment to STEP’s 2026 social services
contract as presented.
Policy consideration: Does the city council support amending STEP’s social services contract to
increase funding for food support by $50,000?
Summary: The city budgeted $250,000 in 2026 for contractual services with non-profit agencies
serving residents in St. Louis Park that offer basic needs services that the city could provide and
that address program goals. Following a competitive request for proposals (RFP) process, the
council approved the 2026 social services RFP selections at the Dec. 15, 2025 city council
meeting. Following council approval, the city entered into a contract with STEP for $175,000 in
emergency housing assistance and $50,000 to address food insecurity.
STEP has seen a significant increase in need for food assistance due to current federal actions
and is requesting an additional $50,000 to more effectively respond to community need. STEP
has made several changes to operations to ensure residents have food and other essentials. In
January 2026, STEP saw a 25% increase in the number of families seeking food assistance. In
addition, STEP has seen a substantial increase of people shifting from in-person shopping to
receiving deliveries at their home, increasing from an average of 70 home deliveries prior to
December 2025 to 135 in January 2026. STEP expects this increased need for food and home
delivery to continue through the end of the year. STEP is limited by its current facilities and is
entering into a 12-month lease at a temporary facility for staging outgoing deliveries to address
this critical community need. The attached request outlines the need and budget for food
delivery expansion.
This amendment request aligns with the city’s strategic priorities and the values shared by
community through the visioning process. Upon approval by the city council, staff will prepare
an amendment to the contract and work with STEP on funding and reporting requirements.
Financial or budget considerations: $250,000 was budgeted and fully allocated through the
2026 social services RFP. This emergency $50,000 request is in addition to the $250,000 and will
be budgeted from the city manager’s discretionary fund.
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of
housing and neighborhood oriented development.
Supporting documents: STEP supplemental request and contract amendment
Prepared by: Marney Olson, housing manager
Reviewed by: Karen Barton, community development director
Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager
STEP Supplemental to the Social Services Contract: 2026 Crisis Response
February 10, 2026
STEP is requesting an amendment to the 2026 Social Services Contract to supplement
$50,000 to more effectively respond to the current crisis. In response to the disruption of
federal agents in St. Louis Park, STEP has made significant changes to operations to ensure
that residents have food and other essentials. While there has been an increase in the
number of families seeking assistance, the main challenge has been shifting people from
in-person shopping to receive deliveries to their homes. In response to families’ loss of
income, STEP has started a “Crisis Rent Assistance” program. STEP is directing the majority
of its private donations to fund this need; therefore it is not included in this request.
Deliveries
Previous to December, STEP made about 70 deliveries each month. In December, there
were 81 deliveries. In January, there were 135 deliveries. New families are calling daily to
request deliveries. Overall in January, STEP served 655 families with food, comprised of
1,861 individuals. This is a 25% increase from December.
STEP is limited by its current facilities. Deliveries must be scheduled at times when STEP is
not conducting in-person shopping. The demand for deliveries now exceeds STEP’s
capacity. Incoming food donations and purchases are crowding out space in STEP’s
warehouse to stage outgoing deliveries. In order to meet the sustained request, STEP is
entering into a 12 month lease arrangement with a local church. The church will lease
about 1,000 SF of space to STEP for staging outgoing deliveries.
To support the second site operations, STEP will be hiring a “Food Logistics Coordinator”
and recruiting additional community volunteers. The site will require the purchase of
additional equipment. Deliveries will be made by vetted and trained volunteers using their
personal vehicles.
Security
STEP has developed practices to lawfully protect visitors and clients. It includes monitoring
spaces outside and inside the facilities, and protocols if law enforcement comes on site.
STEP will hire a paid receptionist at its primary location. Previously, STEP has relied on
community volunteers to fulfill this role. To be able to effectively respond to the increase in
calls for assistance to STEP and to better manage security needs at the front entrance,
STEP will hire a temporary receptionist. STEP is also investigating adding internal and
external security cameras, but those costs are not part of this request.
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5d)
Title: Approve amendment to 2026 social services award for St. Louis Park Emergency Program (STEP)Page 2
Timeframe and Request
STEP anticipates these enhanced operations will be necessary for many months. Even if
the community experiences a significant pull-back of federal enforcement, it will take a
long time for vulnerable community members to feel safe leaving their homes. It is
imperative we work to find ways to ensure they continue to have food and other essentials.
The accompanying budget breaks down the anticipated crisis response costs through the
end of 2026. STEP requests funding for $50,000. STEP believes it can secure the remainder
of the funding through private donations. Food purchasing is a smaller portion of the
budget because STEP continues to experience a high level of community food donations.
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5d)
Title: Approve amendment to 2026 social services award for St. Louis Park Emergency Program (STEP)Page 3
STEP 2026 CRISIS RESPONSE
SUPPLEMENTAL PROPOSAL
For food delivery expansion and safety requirements
Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec 2026
REVENUE
City of St. Louis Park Social Service Assistance Contract Amended $25,000 $25,000 $50,000
Private donations $14,000 $10,700 $22,500 $22,500 $69,700
TOTAL $39,000 $35,500 $22,500 $22,500 $119,500
EXPENSES
Staffing
Food Logistics Coordinator (New Position) (1.0 FTE)$7,800 $15,600 $15,600 $15,600 $54,600
Receptionist (New Position) (1.0 FTE)$4,200 $13,000 $0 $0 $17,200
New Leased Facility
Rent & Utilities $3,000 $4,500 $4,500 $4,500 $16,500
Pest Control $100 $300 $300 $300 $1,000
Internet/Phones/Security $200 $200 $200 $200 $800
Equipment: Racks/Shelving/Tables $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,000
Equipment: Carts/Expandable Conveyor $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,000
Equipment: Refrigerator $3,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,000
Equipment: Freezer $4,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,000
Equipment: Workstation and Set-Up $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,000
Equipment: Printer/Copier $800 $0 $0 $0 $800
Equipment: Floor Scale $1,800 $0 $0 $0 $1,800
Other
Volunteer background checks $300 $100 $100 $100 $600
Insurance $800 $800 $800 $800 $3,200
Food
Additional food purchasing $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $4,000
TOTAL $39,000 $35,500 $22,500 $22,500 $119,500
NET $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5d)
Title: Approve amendment to 2026 social services award for St. Louis Park Emergency Program (STEP)Page 4
1
First amendment to
agreement for services
STEP
This first amendment to agreement for services (“first amendment” is made and
entered into as of __ day of __________________, 2026 by and between the City of St. Louis
Park, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“city”) and STEP (“contractor”).
WHEREAS, city and contractor entered into an agreement for services dated January 1,
2026; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the agreement city agreed to pay contractor $175,000 for
emergency housing assistance and $50,000 to address food insecurity by May 15, 2026; and
WHEREAS, contractor has requested an additional $50,000 to address emergency need
food insecurity; and
WHEREAS, city wishes to pay contractor an additional $50,000 to address emergency
need food insecurity.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions contained
herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:
1.Additional payment. Paragraph 4. A. of the agreement is hereby amended by adding
the following language after the first sentence:
City shall make an additional one- time only payment to Contractor in the amount
of $50,000 to address an emergency need food insecurity, which shall be paid in
one lump sum by _________________ __, 2026. Staffing and facility lease are
eligible expenses for the emergency need food insecurity payment.
Agreement terms. All other terms, covenants and conditions of the agreement remain in
full force and effect except as modified by this first amendment. The recitals set forth above are
incorporated herein and made a part hereof as if they were set forth in the body hereof.
[Remainder of page intentionally left blank. Signatures follow
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5d)
Title: Approve amendment to 2026 social services award for St. Louis Park Emergency Program (STEP)Page 5
2
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this first amendment the day and
year first above written.
City of St. Louis Park
By:
Kim Keller, city manager
STEP
By:
Derek Reise, executive director
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5d)
Title: Approve amendment to 2026 social services award for St. Louis Park Emergency Program (STEP)Page 6
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: March 2, 2026
Consent agenda item: 5e
Executive summary
Title: Resolution approving a preliminary development agreement with Sentinel Management
Company for redevelopment of the Wooddale Station site - Ward 2
Recommended action: Motion to adopt city resolution approving the preliminary development
agreement between the city, EDA and Sentinel Management Company, LLC for the Wooddale
Station redevelopment site.
Policy consideration: Does the city council support the proposed preliminary development
agreement (PDA) with Sentinel Management Company, LLC, which formalizes the respective
parties’ obligations relative to preparing a mixed-use development plan and contracts for the
Wooddale Station redevelopment site?
Summary: At the study session on Jan. 12, 2026, the city council reviewed Sentinel’s proposal
for redevelopment of the Wooddale Station site, including the city-owned 5950 36th W
property and the adjacent private property, and expressed support for a mixed-use, mixed-
income development with a public plaza fronting Wooddale Avenue and the Green Line LRT
station.
The city council directed staff to prepare a preliminary development agreement (PDA) with
Sentinel Management Company, LLC. The PDA would establish the parties’ intent to work
toward a mutually acceptable mixed-use development plan and a future purchase and
redevelopment contract, authorize site access for due diligence, and outline requirements
related to land use approvals and financing. The current agreement requires development of a
mixed-income project consistent with the approved concept plan, with minimum project
requirements outlined in the attached resolution.
During the term of the PDA, Sentinel Management would have exclusive rights to negotiate the
acquisition of 5950 36th Street W and would reimburse the EDA for reasonable administrative
costs associated with review of the proposed redevelopment.
The PDA would terminate if a purchase and redevelopment contract is not approved by
June 30, 2027, or earlier or upon a determination that negotiations have reached an impasse.
Financial or budget considerations: The precise purchase price of the city’s property, as well as
the amount of any financial assistance necessary to bring this latest Wooddale Station
redevelopment to fruition have yet to be determined.
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of
housing and neighborhood oriented development.
Supporting documents: Resolution
Prepared by: Dean Porter-Nelson, redevelopment administrator
Reviewed by: Jennifer Monson, economic development manager
Karen Barton, community development director/EDA executive director
Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5e) Page 2
Title: Resolution approving a preliminary development agreement with Sentinel Management Company for
redevelopment of the Wooddale Station site - Ward 2
Resolution No. 26-______
Approving a preliminary development agreement between the City of St. Louis
Park, the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority and Sentinel
Management Company, LLC, or an affiliate, successor, or assign thereof
Whereas, pursuant to its authority under Minnesota Statutes, sections 469.090 to
469.1081 and Sections 469.001 through 469.047, both as amended, the St. Louis Park Economic
Development Authority (the “authority”) administers its Redevelopment Project No. 1 (the
“project”), for the purpose of facilitating the redevelopment of certain substandard property
within the project; and
Whereas, the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota (the “city”) owns certain property within
the project (the “city parcel”) and Sentinel Management Company, LLC, a Minnesota limited
liability company, or an affiliate, successor, or assign thereof (collectively, the “developer”),
intends to acquire certain other property adjacent to the city parcel within the project (the
“third-party parcel,” and together with the city parcel, the “development property”), all located
on the south side of the proposed Southwest LRT Wooddale Station; and
Whereas, the development property has been the subject of certain preliminary
negotiations between the parties for purposes of constructing a 5- and 6-story mixed-use,
mixed-income building with approximately 250 to 280 residential units of which at least 21% of
units would be restricted to affordable rent and income levels (including at least 10% of total
units at 50% of area median income, 10% of total units at 60% of area median income and 5
units at 30% of area median income) spread evenly throughout the building, and comparable in
size, number of bedrooms, amenities, and features, consistent with the requirements of the
city’s inclusionary housing policy; the project should include at least 4 affordable three-
bedroom units, and the project should also include approximately 7,000 to 10,000 square feet
of ground floor commercial space (which shall include two or more commercial uses including
at least one micro storefront), a public plaza, structured parking, and amenity spaces (the
“development”); and
Whereas, the authority, the city, and the developer have negotiated a preliminary
development agreement (the “agreement”), providing for the performance of certain activities on
the part of the parties in preparation for the negotiation of a definitive purchase and
redevelopment contract in connection with the development property and the development, as
presented for the city’s consideration; and
Whereas, the city council of the city (the “city council”) has reviewed the agreement and
finds that the approval and execution of the agreement are in the best interest of the city and
its residents and will spur redevelopment of underutilized and blighted property, encourage
commerce and alternative transportation, and enhance the city’s tax base; and
Now therefore be it resolved by the city council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota
as follows:
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5e) Page 3
Title: Resolution approving a preliminary development agreement with Sentinel Management Company for
redevelopment of the Wooddale Station site - Ward 2
1. The city council hereby approves the agreement in substantially the form
presented to the city council, together with any related documents necessary in connection
therewith, including without limitation, all documents, exhibits, certifications, or consents
referenced in or attached to the agreement (collectively, the “documents”).
2. The city council hereby authorizes the mayor and city manager, in their
discretion and at such time, if any, as they may deem appropriate, to execute the documents
on behalf of the city, and to carry out, on behalf of the city, the city’s obligations thereunder
when all conditions precedent thereto have been satisfied. The documents shall be in
substantially the form on file with the city and the approval hereby given to the documents
includes approval of such additional details therein as may be necessary and appropriate and
such modifications thereof, deletions therefrom and additions thereto as may be necessary and
appropriate and approved by legal counsel to the city and by the officers authorized herein to
execute said documents prior to their execution; and said officers are hereby authorized to
approve said changes on behalf of the city. The execution of any instrument by the appropriate
officers of the city herein authorized shall be conclusive evidence of the approval of such
document in accordance with the terms hereof. This resolution shall not constitute an offer
and the documents shall not be effective until the date of execution thereof as provided herein.
3. In the event of absence or disability of the officers, any of the documents
authorized by this resolution to be executed may be executed without further act or
authorization of the city council by any duly designated acting official, or by such other officer
or officers of the city council as, in the opinion of the city attorney, may act in their behalf.
Upon execution and delivery of the documents, the officers and employees of the city council
are hereby authorized and directed to take or cause to be taken such actions as may be
necessary on behalf of the city council to implement the documents.
4. This resolution shall be effective upon approval.
Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council March 2, 2026:
Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: March 2, 2026
Consent agenda item: 5f
Executive summary
Title: Resolution approving collateral assignment and subordination agreement related to the
Terasa redevelopment - Ward 4
Recommended action: Motion to adopt a resolution approving a collateral assignment and
subordination of contract for private development and Tax Increment Financing (TIF) note, and
subordination of city Affordable Housing Trust Fund (AHTF) note and city AHTF mortgage,
related to the Terasa redevelopment.
Policy consideration: Does the city council approve the collateral assignment and
subordination of AHTF and TIF documents as requested by Terasa, LLC, an affiliate of Hempel,
at the request of its lender First International Bank & Trust?
Summary: On Feb. 18, 2025, the EDA entered a contract for private development for the Terasa
redevelopment which includes 222 housing units, 45 of which are affordable, and
approximately 20,000 square feet of commercial space. The contract includes provision of a TIF
note in the maximum principal amount of $5,500,000 and an AHTF loan associated with the
affordable housing units in the amount of $1,000,000.
The Terasa redevelopment recently received its building permit and is approaching a financial
closing in early March 2026. As a condition of providing financing to the development, its lender
First International Bank & Trust requested assignment of certain rights to the lender and
requested that other sources of financing remain subordinate to senior lender financing.
The proposed collateral assignment and subordination of the contract for private development
and TIF note, and subordination of city AHTF note and city AHTF mortgage is provided for in the
contract for development between the EDA and the redeveloper and is similar to other such
assignments and subordinations that the EDA has previously approved for other developments.
The proposed agreement has been reviewed by the EDA’s legal counsel who recommends its
approval.
Financial or budget considerations: All legal fees associated with the preparation of collateral
assignment and subordination are to be paid by the owner, Terasa, LLC, or the lender. There
are no other budget impacts.
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of
housing and neighborhood oriented development.
Supporting documents: Resolution
Prepared by: Dean Porter-Nelson, redevelopment administrator
Reviewed by: Jennifer Monson, economic development manager
Karen Barton, community development director
Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5f) Page 2
Title: Resolution approving amended subordination and assignment of redevelopment contract for the Shoreham -
Ward 1
Resolution No. 26-______
Approving a collateral assignment and subordination of contract for
private development and TIF note, and subordination of city AHTF
note and city AHTF mortgage
Be it resolved by the city council (the “city council”) of the City of St. Louis Park,
Minnesota (the “city”) as follows:
Section 1. Recitals; authorization.
1.01. The city, the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority (the “authority”),
and Terasa, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “developer”) entered into a contract
for private development, dated July 24, 2025 (the “development agreement”), pursuant to
which the developer agreed to construct a 220,580 to 245,099 square foot building including
approximately 222 units of multifamily rental housing and 18,601 to 20,668 square feet of retail
space (the “minimum improvements”).
1.02. To make the minimum improvements financially feasible, the authority and the
city agreed to reimburse the developer for a portion of public development costs (defined and
described in the in the development agreement). The authority agreed to issue to the
developer a taxable tax increment revenue note (Terasa apartments project) (the “TIF note”) in
the maximum principal amount of $5,515,000. The city agreed to make a loan from its
affordable housing trust fund (the “AHTF loan”) in an amount equal to the lesser of $1,000,000
or the amount of public development costs actually incurred less the amount of the TIF note to
the developer. The developer’s obligation to repay the AHTF loan is secured by a combination
mortgage, security agreement, and fixture financing statement (the “AHTF mortgage”) by the
developer in favor of the city, as evidenced by a promissory note (the “AHTF note”) by the
developer in favor of the city.
1.03. First International Bank & Trust, a North Dakota banking corporation (the
“construction lender”), has agreed to provide a construction loan (the “construction loan”) to
the developer in the approximate principal amount of $63,750,000. As a condition to providing
the construction loan, the construction lender requires that the developer assign certain rights
under the development agreement and the TIF note to the construction lender, that certain
rights of the authority and the city under the development agreement be subordinated to the
rights of the construction lender under the loan documents evidencing and securing the
construction loan (the “construction loan documents”), and that certain rights of the city under
the AHTF mortgage and the AHTF note (together, the “AHTF loan documents”) be subordinated
to the rights of the construction lender under the construction loan documents.
1.04. There has been presented to the city council a form of collateral assignment and
subordination of contract for private development and TIF note, and subordination of city AHTF
note and city AHTF mortgage (the “collateral assignment and subordination agreement”)
between the authority, the city, the developer, and the construction lender pursuant to which
the developer will assign certain rights under the development agreement and the TIF note to
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5f) Page 3
Title: Resolution approving amended subordination and assignment of redevelopment contract for the Shoreham -
Ward 1
the construction lender, the authority and the city will subordinate certain of their rights under
the development agreement to the rights of the construction lender under the construction
loan documents, and the city will subordinate certain of its rights under the AHTF loan
documents to the rights of the construction lender under the construction loan documents.
Section 2. Approval of documents.
2.01. The city council approves the collateral assignment and subordination
agreement in substantially the form presented to the city council, together with any related
documents necessary in connection therewith, including without limitation all other
documents, exhibits, certifications, or consents referenced in or attached to the collateral
assignment and subordination agreement (the “documents”).
2.02. The city council hereby authorizes the mayor and city manager, in their
discretion and at such time, if any, as they may deem appropriate, to execute the documents
on behalf of the city, and to carry out, on behalf of the city, the city’s obligations thereunder
when all conditions precedent thereto have been satisfied. The documents shall be in
substantially the form on file with the city and the approval hereby given to the documents
includes approval of such additional details therein as may be necessary and appropriate and
such modifications thereof, deletions therefrom and additions thereto as may be necessary and
appropriate and approved by legal counsel to the city and by the officers authorized herein to
execute said documents prior to their execution; and said officers are hereby authorized to
approve said changes on behalf of the city. The execution of any instrument by the appropriate
officers of the city herein authorized shall be conclusive evidence of the approval of such
document in accordance with the terms hereof. This resolution shall not constitute an offer
and the documents shall not be effective until the date of execution thereof as provided herein.
2.03. In the event of absence or disability of the officers, any of the documents
authorized by this resolution to be executed may be executed without further act or
authorization of the city council by any duly designated acting official, or by such other officer
or officers of the city council as, in the opinion of the city attorney, may act in their behalf.
Upon execution and delivery of the documents, the officers and employees of the city council
are hereby authorized and directed to take or cause to be taken such actions as may be
necessary on behalf of the city council to implement the documents.
Section 3. Effective date. This resolution shall be effective upon approval.
Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council March 2, 2026:
Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: March 2, 2026
Consent agenda item: 5g
Executive summary
Title: Resolution authorizing final payment for the 2025 Pavement Management project (4025-
1000) - Ward 4
Recommended action: Motion to adopt resolution accepting work and authorizing final
payment in the amount of $160,776.27 for the 2025 Pavement Management project with
Northwest Asphalt – city Contract No. 67-25.
Policy consideration: Not applicable
Summary: On April 7, 2025, the city council awarded a contract in the amount of $2,767,163.99
to Northwest Asphalt for the 2025 Pavement Management project (4025-1000). The project
included roadway, utility and sidewalk construction in the Cedar Manor, Westwood Hills and
Kimer Pond neighborhoods, Ward 4.
The final contract amount, $2,914,503.06, is $147,339.07 (5.3%) more than the contract
amount awarded. Details on the contract changes are included in the discussion section of this
report.
Financial or budget considerations: The final cost of the work performed by the contractor
under Contract No. 67-25 has been calculated as follows:
Original contract (based on estimated quantities) $ 2,767,163.99
Change orders/ extra work + $ 132,960.85
Quantity overruns + $ 14,378.22
Final contract cost $ 2,914,503.06
Previous payments - $ 2,753,726.79
Balance due $ 160,776.27
This project was included in the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Funding was provided by the
following sources: franchise fees, utility funds and general obligation bonds (sidewalk). The
costs above and beyond the original budget will be covered with sewer and franchise fee
revenues.
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a variety of options for
people to make their way around the city comfortably, safely and reliably.
Supporting documents: Discussion
Resolution
Prepared by: Aaron Wiesen, engineering project manager
Reviewed by: Debra Heiser, engineering director; Amelia Cruver, finance director
Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5g) Page 2
Title: Resolution authorizing final payment for the 2025 Pavement Management project (4025-1000) - Ward 4
Discussion
Background: Annually, the city rehabilitates several miles of local residential streets as part of
the pavement management program. The work included street rehabilitation, which consisted
of removing and replacing the existing bituminous pavement and replacing portions of concrete
curb and gutter where needed. Other work included sidewalk repairs, sewer repairs and select
watermain replacement. In addition to the street rehabilitation activities, the construction of
new sidewalk segments was integrated into the project for cost savings, reduction in customer
inconvenience and contractor coordination.
On April 7, 2025, the city council awarded a contract in the amount of $2,767,163.99 to
Northwest Asphalt for the 2025 Pavement Management project. The final contract amount
($2,914,503.06) was 5.3% more than the contract amount. There were change orders approved
and quantity overruns on the project during construction that led to the increased costs.
During construction, some unexpected items came up. This additional work and quantity
overruns added $147,339.07 to the contract. The contract changes and overruns are attributed
to:
• During construction of the sanitary sewer lift station and force main on Gettysburg
Avenue (west of Flag Avenue), the contractor encountered high groundwater conditions
that were not anticipated. Excavation for the sanitary sewer gravity line, force main and
structures was halted when groundwater levels could not be adequately lowered
through pumping alone. It was determined that groundwater from a nearby lake was
contributing to the issue. To safely complete the work, additional measures were
required, including installation of excavation sheeting, placement of rock to stabilize the
subbase and increased pumping and bypassing. These efforts allowed construction to
proceed and were approved as extra work due to unforeseen conditions outside the
original contract. The cost was $68,208.99. This work was paid for using sanitary sewer
funds.
• During construction of storm and sanitary sewer manholes, modifications to the
structures were identified after excavation. These changes were necessary and
approved as extra work. The storm cost was $42,694.06 and sanitary cost was
$7,642.80. This work was paid for using storm and sanitary sewer funds.
• Additional landscaping and street lighting repairs were identified during construction
and added to the project. The cost was $14,415. This work was paid for using franchise
fees.
• There was a quantity overrun that can be attributed to a small adjustment to the project
limits, resulting in additional street pavement replacement. The cost was $14,378.22.
This work was paid for using franchise fees.
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5g) Page 3
Title: Resolution authorizing final payment for the 2025 Pavement Management project (4025-1000) - Ward 4
Financial or budget considerations: Due to these contract changes and quantity overruns, the
following are the increases/decreases to each funding source based on contract costs:
Constructions Costs Low bid Final
Franchise fees (street) $2,147,808.58 $2,246,603.38
Water utility $0 $0
Stormwater utility $288,884.50 $ 336,726.13
Sanitary sewer utility $280,134.47 $ 284,897.35
Franchise fees (sidewalks)* $50,336.44 $ 46,276.20
Bid total $2,767,163.99 $2,914,503.06
* While new sidewalk construction is typically funded through general obligation bonds, for
this project, it was paid for using franchise fees. This was the only project in 2025 that had
bonding as a funding source, and the amount was too small to warrant issuing bonds.
The final cost of the work performed by the contractor under contract no. 67-25 has been
calculated as follows:
Original contract (based on estimated quantities) $ 2,767,163.99
Change orders/ extra work + $ 132,960.85
Quantity overruns + $ 14,378.22
Final contract cost $ 2,914,503.06
Previous payments - $ 2,753,726.79
Balance due $ 160,776.27
This project was included in the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Funding was provided by the
following sources: franchise fees, utility funds and general obligation bonds (sidewalk).
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5g) Page 4
Title: Resolution authorizing final payment for the 2025 Pavement Management project (4025-1000) - Ward 4
Resolution No. 26-____
Authorizing final payment
and accepting work for the
2025 Pavement Management Project
City Project No. 4025-1000
Contract No. 67-25
Be it resolved by the city council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, as follows:
1. Pursuant to a written contract with the city dated April 7, 2025, Northwest Asphalt has
satisfactorily completed the 2025 Pavement Management project, as per Contract No.
67-25.
2. The engineering director has filed her recommendations for final acceptance of the
work.
3. The work completed under this contract is accepted and approved. The final contract
cost is $2,914,503.06.
4. The city manager is directed to make final payment in the amount of $160,776.27 on
this contract, taking the contractor's receipt in full.
Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council March 2, 2026:
Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: March 2, 2026
Consent agenda item: 5h
Executive summary
Title: Resolution to prioritize federal congressionally directed spending requests
Recommended action: Motion to adopt resolution declaring the official intent of the City of St.
Louis Park to prioritize federal congressionally directed spending requests.
Policy consideration: Does the city council agree with the prioritization of the federal
congressionally directed spending requests?
Summary: As part of the federal congressionally directed spending (CDS) application, applicants
must prioritize all the submitted projects. Staff will be submitting the following projects, in the
following prioritization:
1.Oxford and Louisiana Area Improvements, Project No. 4028-1100
2.Minnetonka Boulevard Reconstruction phase 2, Project No. 4028-7000
These projects were prioritized based on need, financial impact and other contextual factors,
including the CDS application process itself.
Financial or budget considerations: If CDS funding is received, it provides an opportunity to
revise project budgets and reallocate funds if necessary.
Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable.
Supporting documents: Resolution
Oxford and Louisiana Improvements background
Hennepin County Minnetonka Boulevard Open House boards
Prepared by: Clancy Ferris, legislative & grants analyst
Reviewed by: Debra Heiser, engineering director
Amelia Cruver, finance director
Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5h) Page 2
Title: Resolution to prioritize federal congressionally directed spending requests
Resolution No. 26 - ____
Declaring the official intent of the City of St. Louis Park to prioritize
congressional directed spending (CDS) requests
Be it resolved by the city council (the “City Council”) of the City of St. Louis Park, Hennepin
County, Minnesota (the “city”) as follows:
1. The City of St. Louis Park intends to submit congressional directed spending (CDS)
request
2. The submission requires prioritization of congressional directed spending requests
3. The city council must approve prioritization of congressional directed spending requests
4. The congressional directed spending projects are prioritized as follows:
1. Oxford and Louisiana Area Improvements,
2. Minnetonka Boulevard Reconstruction, phase 2
Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council March 2, 2026:
Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk
This project is needed to repair existing infrastructure, remove
barriers to active transportation and transit, and promote
environmental sustainability and climate preparedness. This
project will:
1.Increase transportation access to under-served populations
a.The area is home to over 1,000 affordable housing units
b.27 percent of residents in area identified as people of
color in the 2020 census. This is high when compared to
22.8 percent citywide
c. Sidewalk construction will fill in gaps in the network
creating connections where none exist today
d. Sidewalk construction will connect over 12,000
employees in the area to transit, both transit route 612
and the future Metro Green Line Extension stop making
it easier and more attractive to use transit
2.Improve neighborhood livability and community connection
a.Creates connections to homes, Cedar Lake regional trail,
local businesses and parks.
b.New roundabout at the intersection estimated to reduce
vehicle emissions by 25%.
c.Air quality will be improved by safer access to walking,
biking, and transit
3. Reduce downstream pollution and promote climate resiliency
a.Minnehaha Creek discharges into the Mississippi River,
which provides nearly 20 million people with drinking water
and supports a diversity of wildlife
b.Currently, the area drains directly into Minnehaha Creek,
untreated
c.New infrastructure would remove pollutants prior to
discharge into the creek, creating safer drinking water and
habitat for those downstream
d.Building regional flood protection to remove critical
infrastructure out of the flood zone, including Methodist
Hospital and public roadways
These roadways were last constructed in 1973 and have far
exceeded their design life. Reconstruction is necessary because
routine maintenance activities such as bituminous overlays and
crack seals are no longer cost-effective.
The total project cost is $15.74 million. The city is requesting 50%
of the project cost in state funds and will match the remainder
with local funds. This project is included in the city’s capital
improvement plan.
Prepared by:
•Repairs and modernizes roadways with
regional and local significance.
•Enhances transit and pedestrian
accessibility to Methodist Hospital, a
major hospital serving the Minneapolis-
St. Paul area located two blocks south
of this project.
•New stormwater infrastructure
•Provides flood storage, removing
critical infrastructure out of the
flood zone
•Removes barriers for sustainable,
non-motorized transportation
will remove pollutants from
stormwater.
•Supports equitable and affordable
transportation alternatives
•Advances the city’s goal of carbon
neutrality by 2040
•Improves air quality for
Project
benefits:
APPLICANT:
City of St. Louis Park
AREA:
Southwest St. Louis Park
CITY WHERE PROJECT IS LOCATED:
St. Louis Park
COUNTY WHERE PROJECT IS LOCATED:
Hennepin
REQUESTED AWARD AMOUNT:
$7,870,000
TOTAL PROJECT COST:
$15,740,000
OXFORD AND LOUISIANA AREA
INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT
Encouraging community connection, replacing aging infrastructure,
preventing pollution and promoting climate resiliency
These roadways provide regional movement of goods and connections to commerce. They’re currently used by almost
4,500 vehicles daily, with 83% of that traffic coming from outside of St. Louis Park. Providing local and regional
connections to Highway 7 and Excelsior Boulevard. The project infrastructure reconstruction and improvements will
significantly contribute to a state of good repair, reduce travel delays, create connections, and protect the
environment.
Public
purpose:
Video: Experience
driving this route
surrounding neighborhoods
•Replacing at risk watermain
and sanitary sewer
Prepared by:
?A@
Kxfordͬ Louisiana area infrastructure investment
•Replacement of 1.67 miles of roadway pavement
•Construction of 0.75 miles of new sidewalk
•Building a roundabout at the intersection of OdžĨord St and
Louisiana Avenue
•Regional stormwater treatment and flood storage
•Crosswalk enhancements for people walking and rolling, with
shorter crossing distances, and userͲactuated flashing beacons
•Replacement of 0.ϱ miles of watermain, ensuring continuity of
service for Dethodist Hospital
•Modification of existing sidewalks and intersections to meet
ADA reƋuirements, improve safety and operation needs
•Replacement of existing street lighting with new LED systems
•Public utility repair and replacement
•Oxford Street from Minnehaha Creek Bridge to Edgewood
Avenue
Meadowbrook bridge
•Redecking of the Meadowbrook bridge over Minnehaha Creek
•Edgewood Avenue from Oxford Street to Cambridge Street
•Cambridge Street from Edgewood Avenue to Alabama Avenue
•Louisiana Avenue from 100 ft north of the intersection with
Oxford Street to 300 ft south of the intersection
Project improvements:
Roadway segments included:
•Meadowbrook Road from Excelsior Boulevard to the
OXFORD AND LOUISIANA AREA
INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT
of the city is primarily zoned industrial, and planning for the redevelopment in preparation
for light rail has been underway for the last ten years. Redevelopment of the private buildings will
provide an economic benefit to area taxpayers along with a variety of housing options for people who
would like to live in St. Louis Park. The new buildings will be more efficient, thus helping with the city’s
climate action goals. The road reconstruction and new sidewalk construction will help residents,
employees, and visitors make their way around the city safely.
Page ϰ
The public engagement vision is to connect with community and stakeholders to share information about the
project and facilitate a high level of community participation in understanding and shaping the project. We
plan to realize this by using the following goals-based approach to public engagement.
Project schedule
Engagement goals
2024-2025 2027
Planning Private utilityrelocations Construction
2028-2029
Timeline is subject to change
2025 - 2026
Phase 1 Phase 2
Conceptual design
Phase 3
2025
Preliminaryengagement
Throughout the project, engagement will be tailored to a diverse audience through a mix of in-person and
online opportunities. Art-focused approaches will be used to make engagement more dynamic and to foster a
deeper connection between the project and the feedback provided by community members.
Project background
Hennepin County, in partnership with the City of St. Louis Park, is planning to reconstruct Minnetonka
Boulevard between Vernon and Xylon avenues. The project will involve a full reconstruction of the roadway,
including sidewalks, boulevards, curb, gutter and streets. The county seeks to replace aging infrastructure and
improve safety and comfort for people of all ages and abilities walking, biking, rolling and driving along the
corridor.
Construction is planned to begin in 2027. This project is a continuation of reconstruction done on the eastern
portion of Minnetonka Boulevard, between Highway 100 and France Avenue.
Inclusive
engagement
Project area
Arts-based
engagement
Prioritize community
relationships
Minnetonka Boulevard reconstruction project
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5h)
Title: Resolution to prioritize federal congressionally directed spending requests Page 5
From May to July 2025, the project team went out into the community and used the following methods to
gather input on project goals and future visioning, and understand how residents and local businesses use
Minnetonka Boulevard.
Our community engagement
Community input from listening sessions and online feedback during preliminary engagement helped shape
the vision statements, which reect the wants and needs expressed by community members. During Phase 1,
community members shared how each vision aligned with project goals through an interactive activity and
online survey.
Community goals and visions
What have we heard so far?
Community members engage with project sta at the Phase 1 open house (top left, top
middle). Community members and project sta participate in a Juneteenth celebration
(bottom photo). A yard sign with project information placed along the boulevard (right).
Businesses
engaged45
Business survey
responses20
Community events
attended6
Event attendees130
Community
survey responses100
Vision #1:
Prioritizing safety and access for
people biking and walking
Vision #2:
Prioritizing transit and public
spaces
Vision #3:
Prioritizing business needs
Many community
members agree that
Vision #1 best meets
project goals
Yard signs placed20
Community members provide feedback on one
of the artistic street renderings at the open house.
MOST AGREEMENT
LEAST AGREEMENT
Some community
members agreed the
that Vision #2 met the
project goals
Few community
members agreed
Vision #3 met the
project goals
Minnetonka Boulevard reconstruction project
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5h)
Title: Resolution to prioritize federal congressionally directed spending requests Page 6
Phase 2 feedback will be posted online and used to help narrow down concept alternatives. Phase 3 will begin in early 2026 with more opportunities to share your
feedback and engage with the project. This includes pop-up engagement at local community events, surveys, and a public open house. There will also be
opportunities to provide feedback online. Your feedback, along with technical data and city and county plans, will be used to create a recommended design for the
boulevard.
Scan the QR code or visit
beheardhennepin.org/minnetonka-boulevard
to sign up for project updates.
Contact
Nick Turner
Design Lead
Oce: (612) 767-9350
Jason Staebell
Project Manager
Oce: (612) 596-0371
We will host one open house during Phase 3 to gather
feedback on the recommended design concept for
Minnetonka Boulevard.
Open house
An online survey will be available on the BeHeard project
website, it will provide an online method to gather input
about the recommended design concept.
Phase 3 survey
The project team will attend several pop-up events. These
events are designed to raise community awareness about
the project and gather input.
Pop-up
events
Ways you can continue to be involved
Minnetonka Boulevard reconstruction project
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5h)
Title: Resolution to prioritize federal congressionally directed spending requests Page 7
Roundabouts
To what extent do you agree with using roundabouts on Minnetonka Boulevard?
Strongly AgreeStrongly Disagree
FEEDBACK QUESTION
N
• Fewer severe crashes
• Less o-peak delays
• Slower vehicle speeds
• Improved walkability
• Lower emissions
BENEFITS
• More space needed
• May require property impacts
• Higher upfront costs
• Less familiar for some drivers
• Can be challenging for larger vehicles
TRADEOFFS
Roundabouts are circular intersections that slow trac, improve safety, and provide continuous ow for all roadway users. Roundabouts are being considered at certain
intersections along the boulevard. Using your stickers, please tell us whether you agree with its use along Minnetonka Boulevard in the proposed locations (and add
comments or questions below if you have them!).
Example of compact roundabout in
Shakopee, MN
Minnetonka Boulevard reconstruction project
N
Example of a roundabout at the
intersection of Minnetonka
Boulevard and Vernon Avenue S.
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5h)
Title: Resolution to prioritize federal congressionally directed spending requests Page 8
Pedestrian refuges
To what extent do you agree with using pedestrian refuges on Minnetonka Boulevard?
• Enhanced crossing visibility
• Landscaping opportunity
• Provides shorter crossing
distances for pedestrians
• Slower vehicle speeds
• Wider roadway footprint
• Increased maintenance (if planted)
BENEFITS
TRADEOFFS
Strongly AgreeStrongly Disagree
FEEDBACK QUESTION
Pedestrian refuges are concrete “islands” in the middle of the road designed to provide people crossing the road with a place to stop for trac. Pedestrian refuges are
being considered in some locations along the boulevard. Using your stickers, please tell us whether you agree with its use along Minnetonka Boulevard in the
proposed locations (and add comments or questions below if you have them!).
Minnetonka Boulevard reconstruction project
Example of a pedestrian refuge at the
intersection of Minnetonka Boulevard
and Hampshire Avenue S.N
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 5h)
Title: Resolution to prioritize federal congressionally directed spending requests Page 9
Meeting: Closed Executive Session
Meeting date: March 2, 2026
Discussion item: 1
Executive summary
Title: City manager annual performance evaluation
Recommended action: Consultant Georgine Madden will facilitate a discussion with the city
manager and council regarding feedback collected from an annual performance evaluation
process. City council and Kim Keller, city manager, will review the information together with the
consultant and set a course for next steps.
Policy consideration: Not applicable.
Summary: The city council and city manager will discuss the city manager’s performance
evaluation in a closed executive session. The information will be sent to the city council under
separate cover.
Once completed, final documents will be presented for formal approval at the next regular
council meeting. In accordance with Minnesota open meeting law, this meeting will be audio-
recorded. The law states: “All closed meetings, except those as permitted by the attorney-client
privilege, must be electronically recorded at the expense of the public body. Unless otherwise
provided by law, the recordings must be preserved for at least three years after the date of the
meeting.” The city council is not voting on this item on March 2, 2026. The city council will vote
on the city manager’s performance review at the regular meeting on March 23, 2026.
Financial or budget considerations: None at this time.
Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable.
Supporting documents: None
Prepared by: Rita Vorpahl, HR director
Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: March 2, 2026
Communications and announcements: 8a
Executive summary
Title: Application for financial assistance – Minnetonka Boulevard Twin Homes - Ward 1
Recommended action: None at this time. This report is for informational purposes only and will
be discussed during the study session on March 9, 2026.
Policy consideration: Is the EDA/city council willing to consider entering into a purchase and
redevelopment contract with GMHC to sell city owned land, enter into subgrant agreements for
existing federal funds and cleanup grants, and provide financing of up to $400,000 from the
Affordable Housing Trust Fund (AHTF) to enable the project to achieve financial feasibility?
Summary: GMHC has a preliminary development agreement with the EDA to acquire four
vacant and contaminated city-owned parcels located at 5639, 5643, 5647 and 5707 Minnetonka
Boulevard. GMHC plans to construct four twin homes, providing a total of eight affordable
homes suitable for long term family ownership, to be kept in a community land trust (CLT) by
Homes Within Reach, maintaining permanent affordability of the homes upon resale.
The proposed project has an anticipated total development cost of $7.86 million. The
development has extraordinary project costs associated with contamination cleanup and
extensive site improvements, among other factors. All units would be affordable to households
with incomes below 80% of the area median income (AMI), with a goal of at least two
homebuyers with incomes between 50% AMI - 60% AMI, exceeding the city's Inclusionary
Housing Policy requirements. This report includes analysis of GMHC’s financial request based
on the anticipated gap between proposed sources of funds and uses of funds for project costs.
Financial or budget considerations: Redeveloper GMHC has identified approximately
$7,868,000 in sources of funds, including $4,127,904 in grant funds secured by the EDA and city
on the project’s behalf, among other grants and private sources. GMHC is currently completing
a bid package to obtain updated contractor estimates and has expressed concern that
construction costs may exceed the contingency. As a result, GMHC is requesting up to $400,000
from the AHTF to ensure the project can commence before year-end. Without this funding, the
project risks forfeiting over $1 million from Hennepin County’s Accelerator Program, as the
county’s funding expires at the end of 2026 and is unable to be extended. Staff and Ehlers, the
EDA’s financial consultant, are reviewing the request for $400,000 in financial assistance from
the AHTF, pending receipt of final bids with the expectation of minimizing city assistance. The
proposed redevelopment would include GMHC purchasing the city’s land for $1 million,
utilization of secured city and EDA grants of $4,127,904, and the creation of permanent
affordable homeownership opportunities.
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of
housing and neighborhood oriented development.
Supporting documents: Discussion, 2025 site plan and renderings
Prepared by: Dean Porter-Nelson, redevelopment administrator
Keith Dahl, municipal advisor, Ehlers
Reviewed by: Jennifer Monson, economic development manager; Karen Barton, community
development director and EDA executive director
Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 8a) Page 2
Title: Application for financial assistance – Minnetonka Boulevard Twin Homes - Ward 1
Discussion
Site information: The proposed redevelopment site consists of four city-owned parcels located
at 5639, 5643, 5647 and 5707 Minnetonka Boulevard in the Sorenson neighborhood. The
parcels, which were previously occupied by substandard single-family homes with significant
deferred maintenance, were purchased by the City of St. Louis Park between 2018 and 2020.
The city sought to redevelop the site and demolished the homes in 2022.
The 0.6-acre redevelopment site was an unpermitted dump prior to the construction of the
four original homes on the site, requiring extensive contamination clean-up. A response action
plan (RAP) prepared by Condition Services and Javelin Group describes the removal of
contaminated soils that include VOCs, heavy metals and dump debris containing asbestos. Soils
will be replaced with clean fill, allowing for safe and healthy use of the site for owner occupied
residences.
The site borders the Colonial Terrace Apartments and the Spirit of Christ Community Lutheran
Church. It is also walking distance to nearby amenities such as Caribou Coffee, the Kenwood
Gymnastics Center and several local parks (Keystone, Sunshine and Roxbury Parks). Minnetonka
Boulevard was recently reconstructed east of Highway 100, including a shared use bike and
pedestrian path. The section of Minnetonka Boulevard in front of redevelopment site is slated
for reconstruction starting in 2027.
Proposed redevelopment location:
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 8a) Page 3
Title: Application for financial assistance – Minnetonka Boulevard Twin Homes - Ward 1
Site area (acres): 0.6 acre
Current use: vacant land/city-owned Surrounding land uses:
Neighborhood: Sorenson North: Single family residential
East: Multi-family residential
South: Multi-family residential,
recreational facilities
West: Religious institution
Narrative summary of past actions: The Minnetonka Boulevard Twin Homes project is many
years in the making. The project began when the EDA purchased four older, substandard homes
between 2018 and 2020 and entered into a preliminary development agreement with GMHC in
2021. In early 2022, the EDA secured Local Housing Incentive Account (LHIA) funds from the
Metropolitan Council and the EDA demolished the homes that spring to prepare the site. Later
in 2022, the city applied for congressionally directed spending and obtained $3 million through
Congresswoman Omar’s office. The funds were awarded to support a multifamily community
land trust.
Before funds could be spent, the city worked with Hennepin County to complete a U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) environmental review process that
began in late 2024 and concluded in late March 2025. In conjunction with the environmental
review, the project then advanced through planning commission review and city council
approvals in early 2025. The city council then approved a grant agreement between HUD and
the City of St. Louis Park specifically allocating the grant funds to the Minnetonka Boulevard
Twin Homes project on July 21, 2025, by Resolution No. 25-079.
In spring 2025, GMHC began due diligence and environmental testing on the site, discovered
significant environmental cleanup needs, and prepared a Response Action Plan. The plan was
approved by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) in time to apply for cleanup
grants in the Fall of 2025. In October 2025, the EDA applied for environmental cleanup funds
from the Metropolitan Council (TBRA) and Hennepin County (ERF), with awards totaling
$870,000 received in late 2025 and early 2026, sufficient to cover the full cleanup costs
associated with the project. Most recently, Ehlers, the EDA’s financial consultant, reviewed
GMHC’s request for Affordable Housing Trust Fund assistance to address what GMHC
characterizes as a remaining financing gap driven by concerns over potential construction cost
increases and the risk of losing more than $1 million in committed funding if the project does
not commence before year-end. Based on the current pro forma, the project has secured
sufficient funding to proceed without AHTF assistance at a total development cost of
approximately $7.8 million. However, if rebid construction costs are higher, this will create a
financial gap in the pro forma that will need to be addressed.
Present considerations: Nonprofit redeveloper Greater Metropolitan Housing Corporation
(“redeveloper”) has a preliminary development agreement with the EDA and has secured
$7,868,000 in funds to build four Twin Homes, resulting in eight individual ownership units.
The new twin homes will be constructed as zero lot line structures with one shared wall. Each
side of the structure will be located on its own lot and garages will be provided for each unit.
GMHC is partnering with Homes Within Reach, who will establish a land trust on the properties
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 8a) Page 4
Title: Application for financial assistance – Minnetonka Boulevard Twin Homes - Ward 1
prior to selling the homes to low-income qualified home buyers, meaning that all future buyers
will be able to purchase the homes at affordable prices. Minnetonka Boulevard Twin Homes will
be a single-phase owner-occupied development.
Rendering of proposed Minnetonka Blvd. Twin Homes
Proposed unit mix: All of the units will be affordable to households at or below 80% of Area
Median Income. Four of the homes will have three bedrooms, and four will have four bedrooms
to accommodate families of varying sizes. The homes will range from 1,750-1,900 square feet of
finished indoor living space and will include front porches and attached garages.
Unit Type 60-80% AMI
3-bedroom 4
4-bedroom 4
Total 8
Upon closing on its financing, the development team plans to commence site cleanup and
construction in May or June 2026. The homes will be sold in late 2026 or early 2027. Marketing
will be conducted by Homes Within Reach land trust, targeting buyers with incomes up to 80%
AMI with preference given to buyers with incomes closer to 60% AMI. The maximum income
for all buyers will be 80% of Area Median Income (AMI). The homes will be sold for
approximately $250,000, (depending on buyer’s annual income). Homes Within Reach will
retain the land in trust through a 99-year ground lease on the land underlying all eight twin
homes, allowing for the homes to remain affordable across future resales. This means that
future buyers will continue to be able to purchase homes for an affordable price, as future price
appreciation of the land will be shared between the seller, and the community land trust.
The developer: Founded in 1970 by the Minneapolis business community in response to social
unrest in North Minneapolis, Greater Metropolitan Housing Corporation (GMHC) was created
to expand and improve affordable housing for low- and moderate-income households. It
launched a single-family homeownership program and a predevelopment revolving loan fund
and has built or renovated 1,971 homes totaling more than $282.5 million in development
costs. In the past five years, 79% of buyers were people of color and 79% were first-time
homebuyers, with most households earning low to moderate incomes. GMHC has led
innovative and energy-efficient projects across Minneapolis and the broader metro area, often
in partnership with cities, counties and Minnesota Housing. With decades of experience, GMHC
continues to focus on stabilizing neighborhoods, expanding homeownership and advancing
affordable housing development. GMHC will partner with Homes Within Reach community land
trust on the sale of the homes to income-qualified buyers, and Homes Within Reach will
maintain the land in trust.
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 8a) Page 5
Title: Application for financial assistance – Minnetonka Boulevard Twin Homes - Ward 1
Homes Within Reach and community land trust background: Homes Within Reach (HWR), also
known as West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust, is a nonprofit community-based
organization that creates and preserves affordable homeownership opportunities for working
families in suburban Hennepin County. Since 2001, it has helped more than 276 households
earning below 80% of Area Median Income become homeowners by using the Community Land
Trust (CLT) model. Through this approach, the organization acquires and renovates homes, then
sells the house to qualified buyers while retaining ownership of the land, making
homeownership more affordable and accessible. HWR will participate in the sale and future
resale of new construction homes for the Minnetonka Boulevard Twin Home project.
Under the CLT model, buyers purchase only the home and enter into a renewable 99-year
Ground Lease for the land at a nominal fee. By removing land costs from the mortgage, families
benefit from lower purchase prices, reduced down payments and lower closing costs.
Homeowners build equity, receive tax benefits and can pass the home to heirs, while resale is
guided by a formula that preserves long-term affordability for future low- to moderate-income
buyers. This structure promotes stability for families and strengthens the local workforce and
community.
St. Louis Park has historically provided $120,000 - $300,000 in funding annually to HWR since
2020. This funding has created 14 affordable home ownership opportunities in the city. HWR
received $300,000 annually in both 2024 (supporting three homebuyer purchases) and 2025
(supporting four homebuyer purchases). The proposed gap funding for the Twin Homes project
is anticipated to be the city’s 2026 funding for HWR. Given the size of the Twin Homes project
and the involvement of HWR in the project, the partnership between HWR and GMHC has
requested up to $400,000 in AHTF to support the overall project.
Inclusionary housing and AHTF policy alignment: The Minnetonka Boulevard Twin Homes
project will create eight permanently affordable three- and four-bedroom ownership homes for
families earning up to 80 percent of Area Median Income (AMI), exceeding the city’s
Inclusionary Housing Policy requirements. In addition, targeted outreach will include
households earning approximately 60 percent AMI, expanding access to new construction
homeownership opportunities for moderate-income buyers who would otherwise be unable to
afford them.
The homes will be held in a Community Land Trust (CLT), ensuring long-term affordability
through a resale price formula that maintains affordability for future buyers earning between
60 and 80 percent AMI. This structure preserves affordability in perpetuity, rather than relying
on one-time subsidies. By providing 100 percent of the units at or below 80 percent AMI, the
project meets and exceeds the city’s Inclusionary Housing Policy standards.
The project also fully aligns with the city’s Affordable Housing Trust Fund (AHTF) Policy. The
AHTF supports the creation of permanently affordable ownership housing for low- and
moderate-income households and requires that for-sale homes assisted by the fund be made
available to households earning at or below 80 percent AMI. Through the CLT model, the
project ensures lasting affordability, supports sustainable homeownership and preserves public
investment for future generations, thereby meeting all applicable AHTF policy objectives and
requirements.
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 8a) Page 6
Title: Application for financial assistance – Minnetonka Boulevard Twin Homes - Ward 1
Green building policy alignment: The development team has been working with city staff to
incorporate the city’s Green Building Policy into the design and specifications of the project.
The policies are incorporated into the construction process, including construction waste
management, the management of the soil onsite and the stormwater management. The
buildings are designed to meet the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Zero Energy Ready Home
(ZERH) program, which are high performance homes that are net zero ready, will be Energy Star
New Home certified and adhere to the Minnesota Green Communities criteria to construct
properties beneficial to the health of the environment and the future occupants.
All of the homes will be built with sustainable features including electric appliances, low flow
fixtures, LED lighting, high quality building materials and insulation, and will meet the city’s
green building policy requirements for single-family homes through adherence to Enterprise
Green Communities criteria.
Additional community design attributes: The redevelopment advances transit and pedestrian
oriented design by creating compact, zero-lot-line twin homes that increase density on infill
parcels while maintaining a walkable streetscape. Each unit includes direct sidewalk access and
modest garages, encouraging less car-dependence. A pedestrian and bike trail was recently
incorporated into the reconstruction of Minnetonka Boulevard east of Highway 100, and the
remaining portion of Minnetonka Boulevard fronted by the redevelopment will undergo
reconstruction in 2027. The site is within walking distance of parks, schools, retail and services
along Minnetonka Boulevard, making daily trips convenient without driving. Homes will be
solar-ready and EV-ready, aligning with regional goals for sustainable, multimodal living.
Together, these features encourage homeowners to walk, bike and use transit as practical,
everyday options.
Racial equity and inclusion: The project will meet the city’s Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
policy and will set goals for participation of women and BIPOC-owned contractors in the
development. In addition, both GMHC and HWR strongly emphasize racial equity throughout
their work.
Greater Metropolitan Housing Corporation (GMHC) partners with housing counselors and
culturally specific organizations to connect first-generation and BIPOC homebuyers with
affordable ownership opportunities. It offers flexible homebuyer education workshops,
provides multilingual information and support, and works with seniors and persons with
disabilities through housing rehab and repair programs that help residents safely remain in
their homes.
Homes Within Reach (HWR), through its Community Land Trust, has successfully marketed and
sold permanently affordable homes to communities of color and first-time buyers. HWR
partners with nonprofits, schools, and faith-based organizations to reach renters and lower-
income households, hosts neighborhood-based information sessions, and uses translated
materials and targeted outreach networks to engage underrepresented groups. Together,
GMHC and HWR bring a strong track record of inclusive engagement to ensure affordable
housing opportunities reach those most impacted by racial and economic disparities.
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 8a) Page 7
Title: Application for financial assistance – Minnetonka Boulevard Twin Homes - Ward 1
Analysis of the AHTF request and project’s financial need
Financial need: The $7.86 million project is primarily funded through secured grants ($4.35
million, 52.6%), supplemented by a $2 million construction loan (24.2%), a $1.04 million
Hennepin County deferred loan (12.6%) and $475,000 in MN Housing interim financing (5.7%).
As a non-profit organization, GMHC has invested substantial resources in this project to date.
Due to the unique circumstances of constructing affordable owner-occupied homes sold below
market rate, the developer is not providing cash equity into the project because these homes
will not generate any profits. Instead, GMHC will be reimbursed for past and future work by a
set developers fees.
Funds will be used for land acquisition ($1 million), construction of eight twin homes (about
$4.75 million), approximately $880,599 for grading, site improvements, utilities and
landscaping; $872,760 for soil cleanup and environmental costs; and $746,836 for soft costs
including architecture, engineering and consultants, totaling $7,868,628.
Sources of Financing Estimated
Amount
Percentage Per unit
Developer Equity $0 0.0% $0
Developer Financing A
MN Housing Interim Financing
$475,000 6.0% $59,375
Developer Financing B
Lender
$2,000,000 25.4% $250,000
Grants $4,348,964 54.8% $543,620
Other Sources
Hennepin County Deferred Loan
$1,044,664 13.8% $130,583
TOTAL SOURCES $7,868,628 100% $983,579
Uses of Financing Estimated
Amount
Percentage Per unit
Land acquisition including $14,400 closing costs $1,014,400 12.9% $126,800
Construction (including construction of the 8
homes, permits, general contractor fees,
contingency, certifications & warranties)
$4,419,156 56.2% $552,395
Grading/excavation, alley/site improvements,
landscaping, stormwater management, utilities
$703,236 8.9% $87,905
Soil cleanup & other environmental costs $872,760 11.1% $109,095
Soft costs (architecture, engineering,
environmental, construction interest, legal fees,
land trust admin, developer fee, etc.)
$859,076 10.9% $107,385
Total uses $7,868,628 100% $983,579
Extraordinary development costs: At $983,579 per home, the total development cost reflects
both the desirable location and the unique challenges of building in a fully developed
community like St. Louis Park. According to a 2024 appraisal of the properties, commissioned by
the EDA, the land cost of $126,800 per new unit (12.9% of uses) is consistent with assessed
market values of residential properties in St. Louis Park, and is similar to what the EDA paid
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 8a) Page 8
Title: Application for financial assistance – Minnetonka Boulevard Twin Homes - Ward 1
when then properties were originally acquired. The construction cost of $552,395 per home
(56.2% of uses), equal to about $276 per square foot for construction costs only, not including
other costs, is comparable to the costs of building a new construction home with quality
finishes in the Twin Cities. In St. Louis Park, new construction for-sale homes are extremely
rare; Redfin currently lists only two new homes, one at $647,000 and another at $1,400,000.
Above and beyond the construction cost of the homes, higher costs per unit are driven by site-
specific needs, including grading & excavation of a site with varied topography, site
improvements, utilities, stormwater management, and landscaping ($87,905 per unit) and soil
cleanup ($109,095 per unit). Soft costs of $107,385 per home (10.9% of total development cost)
are significant but are not extraordinary in considering the complexity of the project. These
costs can rise when project timelines are long or when multiple funding sources require
updates to construction drawings, new studies, or additional environmental work. The
cumulative total of these costs brings the total development cost per unit to $983,579.
In addition, when considering the ability of the development to recover construction costs,
these homes will be sold under a Community Land Trust (CLT) model, which limits the sale
prices of homes so that they are affordable to buyers earning between 60% AMI – 80% AMI
(with the possibility of some buyers in the 50% AMI – 60% AMI range), ensuring they remain
permanently affordable for future low- to moderate-income families. This means that
approximately $2 million can be recovered through sales (which will be used to pay back the $2
million construction loan). The community land trust structure provides long-term stability for
both families and the community. It allows households to build equity and wealth, access
federal tax benefits of homeownership, and remain in a walkable suburban neighborhood in St.
Louis Park with access to high quality community facilities and amenities.
Ehlers analysis of development costs and requested assistance: Based upon Ehlers’ review of
the development financials and current market conditions, the project may require additional
assistance from the AHTF depending on final construction costs and actual sales performance of
the twin homes. The development reflects a relatively high per-unit cost of approximately
$984,000, driven in large part by site-specific conditions requiring significant excavation,
grading, soil correction, and environmental cleanup totaling approximately $1,575,996, or
roughly 20% of the total development budget. While the pro forma currently balances without
AHTF participation, the construction budget is based on bids received at the end of 2024.
Additionally, the capital stack is heavily reliant on competitive public grant sources, including
more than $1 million from Hennepin County’s Accelerator Program that is subject to timing
requirements. As a result, the project’s financial feasibility remains highly sensitive to
construction pricing outcomes and adherence to the proposed development schedule.
Proposed level of assistance: The recommended level of assistance for the project was
determined by analyzing private sources of financing, the project’s extraordinary site
development costs, construction costs, required energy and sustainability improvements, and
comparison to other owner-occupied home projects that require compliance with federal
requirements. Ehlers concluded that AHTF assistance in the amount of up to $400,000 may be
necessary to enable the proposed development to become financially feasible, pending final
cost estimates and additional justification of development costs per unit, which will be provided
by the redeveloper prior to approval of a redevelopment agreement. This level of assistance
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 8a) Page 9
Title: Application for financial assistance – Minnetonka Boulevard Twin Homes - Ward 1
would sufficiently close the remaining financial gap to allow the proposed development to
proceed.
Consistent with previous EDA redevelopment agreements, a "lookback" provision will be
incorporated into the redevelopment agreement with the developer. The lookback provision
ensures that the developer is not unduly enriched due to the public financial assistance in the
project.
Summary and recommendations: Based upon its analysis of the developer’s proforma for
Minnetonka Boulevard Twin Homes, Ehlers and city staff determined that the proposed
development has uncertain final cost figures and may not be financially feasible but for the
provision of city financial assistance through the AHTF. However, the project has already
secured significant resources exceeding $7.8 million, including $4,127,000 in City of St. Louis
Park and EDA grant funds associated with the project. The project has received construction
estimates but is still subject to final bids.
If city staff and Ehlers determine there is a remaining financial gap, it is proposed that the city
consider utilizing up to a $400,000 grant from the AHTF. The final amount of city assistance will
be determined after the project has solidified construction estimates and finalized the sale
prices of the homes. The project will be required to demonstrate need for up to the full amount
of subsidy, and city funds will be the last funds allocated to the project after all other sources
have been exhausted. Prior to sending the project out for bid, GMHC is also working closely
with staff on analysis of plans and construction specifications to further reduce construction
costs.
Next steps: The EDA/city council are scheduled to discuss the Minnetonka Boulevard Twin
Home redevelopment during a study session on March 9, 2026. Representatives from GMHC,
Homes Within Reach, and staff will be available to answer any questions.
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 8a) Page 10
Title: Application for financial assistance – Minnetonka Boulevard Twin Homes - Ward 1
Previous actions Governing body Date
EDA purchased 4 older, substandard homes for future
redevelopment (transferred to the city in December
2025).
EDA 2018-2020
EDA enters into a preliminary development agreement
with GMHC for the 5639-5707 Minnetonka Boulevard
site.
MHFA July 6, 2021
EDA receives Local Housing Incentive Account (LHIA)
grant funds from the Metropolitan Council and enters
into a grant agreement.
EDA, Met Council February 2022
Homes are demolished by the EDA, setting the stage for
redevelopment.
EDA Spring 2022
City applies for and receives $3,000,000 in
congressionally directed spending funds for a
multifamily land trust project and allocates those funds
to the proposed redevelopment.
City Council 2022-2023
Written report shared with the city council on the
project’s status.
EDA/City Council June 10, 2024
HUD environmental review is completed for the project.
Hennepin County began the review process in fall 2024,
and HUD signed off on the review on 3/26/2025.
Hennepin County,
HUD
Fall 2024 – March
26, 2025
The planning commission held a public hearing, and
recommended approval of the preliminary and final plat
and preliminary and final Planned Unit Development
(PUD).
Planning
Commission
Feb. 5, 2025
The city council adopted the PUD for the project,
following earlier approval of the plat.
City Council March 17, 2025
City council approves grant agreement HUD for
$3,000,000 in congressionally directed spending, and
agreement is executed.
EDA July 21, 2025
The city council received a written report on the status
of the project.
City Council Nov. 10, 2025
GMHC submits RAP to MPCA, and the EDA authorized
applications to the Met Council and Hennepin County
for $870,000 in environmental cleanup funds for the
project.
EDA Oct. 20, 2025
MPCA approves the Response Action Plan (RAP), the
environmental cleanup plan, for the project.
MPCA, GMHC December 2025
Project received notification of awards for Hennepin
County ERF and Metropolitan Council TBRA cleanup
funds.
EDA, Metropolitan
Council, Hennepin
County
December 2025 –
February 2026
Ehlers, the EDA’s financial consultant, examines GMHC’s
request for AHTF financial assistance.
Ehlers/EDA January-February
2026
City council meeting of March 2, 2026 (Item No. 8a) Page 11
Title: Application for financial assistance – Minnetonka Boulevard Twin Homes - Ward 1
Future actions Governing body Anticipated date
The EDA and city council will discuss the Minnetonka
Boulevard Twin Home development during a study
session with the redeveloper.
EDA, City Council March 9, 2026
EDA will receive a report outlining the business terms of
the Purchase and Redevelopment Contract.
EDA April 2026
The EDA and city council will be asked to consider
approval of a Purchase and Redevelopment Contract.
EDA, City Council May 2026