HomeMy WebLinkAbout2026/02/17 - ADMIN - Agenda Packets - City Council - Regular
AGENDA
FEBRUARY 17, 2026
6:00 p.m. Economic Development Authority meeting – Council Chambers
1. Call to order.
2. Approve agenda.
3. Minutes.
a. EDA meeting minutes of February 2, 2026
4. Consent items – none.
5. Public hearings – none.
6. Regular business – none.
7. Communications and announcements – none.
8. Adjournment.
6:15 p.m. City council meeting – Council Chambers
1. Call to order.
a. Roll call.
b. Pledge of Allegiance.
2. Approve agenda.
3. Presentations.
a. Proclamation observing Ramadan
b. Recognition of donations
4. Minutes.
a. City council meeting minutes of February 2, 2026
5. Consent items.
a. Resolution approving funding for community education programs
b. Resolution accepting donations to the city to support Westwood Hills Nature Center programs
c. Approve city council travel for National League of Cities Congressional Cities Conference 2026
d. Resolution authorizing final payment for 2024 Cedar Lake Road Improvement project (4023-1100) -
Ward 4
e. Resolution authorizing agreement with MnDOT for TH 169 and Cedar Lake Road Project - Ward 4
f. Resolution authorizing participation in Hennepin County Auto Theft Task Force
g. Approve replacement of Vactor sewer cleaner with freightliner chassis (unit 1629)
6. Public hearings - none.
Agenda EDA, city council and special study session meetings of February 17, 2026
7. Regular business.
a. First reading of ordinance amending Chapter 2 of the city code related to boards and commissions
b. Resolutions authorizing agreements for Greenway-Cedar Trail Connection and Streambank
Restoration project (4025-2000) - Ward 2
8. Communications and announcements – none.
9. Adjournment.
Following city council meeting – Special study session – Community Room
Discussion items
1. Consider study session topic proposal
2. Title VI and Language Access Plan update
3. Neighborhood grant program discussion
Written reports
4. Development update - Q1
5. Advisory commissions communications to city council - workplan updates
Members of the public can attend St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority and city council meetings
in person. At regular city council meetings, members of the public may comment on any item on the agenda
by attending the meeting in-person or by submitting written comments to info@stlouisparkmn.gov by noon
the day of the meeting. Official minutes of meetings are available on the city website once approved.
Watch St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority or regular city council meetings live at
bit.ly/watchslpcouncil or at www.parktv.org, or on local cable (Comcast SD channel 14/HD channel 798).
Recordings of the meetings are available to watch on the city's YouTube channel at
www.youtube.com/@slpcable, usually within 24 hours of the meeting’s end.
City council study sessions are not broadcast.
Generally, it is not council practice to receive public comment during study sessions.
The council chambers are equipped with Hearing Loop equipment and headsets are available to borrow.
If you need special accommodations or have questions about the meeting, please call 952.924.2505.
Meeting: Economic development authority
Meeting date: February 17, 2026
Minutes: 3a
Unofficial minutes
EDA meeting
St. Louis Park, Minnesota
Feb. 2, 2026
1. Call to order
President Farris called the meeting to order at 6:03 p.m.
a. Roll call.
Commissioners present: Daniel Bashore, Sue Budd, Nadia Mohamed, Tim Brausen, Yolanda
Farris
Commissioners absent: Jim Engelking, Paul Baudhuin
Staff present: senior planner (Ms. Chamberlain), associate planner (Ms. Champoux), public
works director (Mr. Hall), engineering director (Ms. Heiser), City manager (Ms. Keller), city
attorney (Mr. Mattick), economic development manager (Ms. Monson), deputy city clerk (Ms.
Scott-Lerdal), deputy engineering director (Mr. Sullivan), parks and recreation director (Mr.
West), engineering project manager (Mr. Wiesen)
2. Approve agenda.
It was moved by Commissioner Mohamed, seconded by Commissioner Budd, to approve the
agenda as presented.
The motion passed 5-0 (Commissioners Engelking and Baudhuin absent).
3. Minutes.
a. EDA meeting minutes of January 20, 2026
It was moved by Commissioner Budd, seconded by Commissioner Mohamed, to approve the EDA
meeting minutes of Jan. 20, 2026, as presented.
The motion passed 5-0 (Commissioners Engelking and Baudhuin absent).
4. Consent items.
a. Approve EDA disbursements
b. EDA Resolution No. 26-05 supporting Sentinel Management’s application for the
Hennepin County Transit Oriented Communities grant to support the Wooddale Station
redevelopment project – Ward 2
Commissioner Brausen noted that the EDA disbursements included approximately $43,000,
which he described as funds well-spent.
Economic development authority meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 3a) Page 2
Title: Meeting minutes of February 2, 2026
It was moved by Commissioner Mohamed, seconded by Commissioner Bashore, to approve the
consent item as listed and to waive reading of all resolutions.
The motion passed 5-0 (Commissioners Engelking and Baudhuin absent).
5. Public hearings – none.
6. Regular business – none.
7. Communications and announcements – none.
8. Adjournment.
The EDA meeting adjourned at 6:05 p.m.
______________________________________ ______________________________________
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Yolanda Farris, president
These minutes were created with the assistance of a generative AI transcript service, then edited
and finalized by a city staff person.
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: February 17, 2026
Presentation: 3a
Executive summary
Title: Proclamation observing Ramadan
Recommended action: Mayor to read proclamation observing Ramadan.
Policy consideration: None.
Summary: Ramadan is a time where Muslim Americans across the country come together to
fast from sunrise to sunset, pray and reflect. Ramadan is the ninth month in the Islamic lunar
calendar. For Muslims who are able, fasting in Ramadan is expected and fulfills one of the
important five pillars of the Islamic faith. Muslims in all walks of life fast during the day for
Ramadan; through sports events, college exams, and job responsibilities. The end of the month
of Ramadan is called Eid-Al-Fitr and is celebrated with family and the sharing of food and gifts.
Financial or budget considerations: Not applicable
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to being a leader in racial equity
and inclusion in order to create a more just and inclusive community for all.
Supporting documents: Resource Page
Proclamation
Prepared by: Jocelyn Hernandez Guitron, racial equity and inclusion specialist
Reviewed by: Pa Dao Yang, racial equity and inclusion director
Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 3a) Page 2
Title: Proclamation observing Ramadan
Resource Page:
In recognition of the importance of Ramadan, the City of St. Louis Park encourages you to:
• Learn about history of Islam in our country
o Ramadan 2026: The Muslim Holy Month’s Dates, Meaning & Rules
o Muslims in Minnesota · History of Muslims in the US and Minnesota · Religions in
Minnesota
o People in the Minneapolis-St. Paul metro area | Religious Landscape Study (RLS)
| Pew Research Center
• Consider participating in Ramadan community events
o An Employer's Guide to Fasting at Work
o Your Guide to Ramadan in Minneapolis | Meet Minneapolis | Meet Minneapolis
• Learn about Islamic MN non-profits
o Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR-MN)
o Muslim American Society of Minnesota (MAS MN)
o Reviving the Islamic Sisterhood for Empowerment
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 3a) Page 3
Title: Proclamation observing Ramadan
Proclamation observing Ramadan
Whereas, the Muslim community is an integral part of the diversity that makes St. Louis
Park a great place to experience life; and
Whereas, Islam has been present in our country for over 400 years; where Minnesota is
home to an estimated of 114,000 – 150,000 Muslims and have made significant contributions in
the areas of education, health, science, politics, arts, the protection of civil rights and civic
engagement; and
Whereas, the observance of the Islamic holy month of Ramadan begins with the sighting
of the crescent moon on February 17 and continues for one lunar month from sunrise to sunset
each day – this year ending on March 19, 2026; and
Whereas, St. Louis Park homes have been the location of many iftars, the meal breaking
the fast each day after sunset during Ramadan; and
Whereas, building awareness and learning about Ramadan helps us support our Muslim
neighbors as they fast from sunrise to sunset and helps break negative stereotypes or
assumptions about the Islamic faith, furthering the city’s commitment to being a leader in race,
equity and inclusion,
Now therefore let it be known that the mayor and city council of the City of St. Louis
Park, Minnesota, hereby observe the beginning of Ramadan 2026 and encourage all people to
learn more about your Muslim neighbors in St. Louis Park and across the world.
Wherefore, I set my hand and cause the
Great Seal of the City of St. Louis Park to be
affixed this 17th of February 2026.
________________________________
Nadia Mohamed, mayor
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: February 17, 2026
Presentation: 3b
Executive summary
Title: Recognition of donations
Recommended action: Mayor announce and express appreciation for the following donations
to the city and listed on the consent agenda.
From Donation For
Carl Lundstrom $20
Donation for park enhancements
or program needs at Westwood
Hills Nature Center
Bob Fields Two prints
Donation of two prints by wildlife
artist Jim Hautman to display at
Westwood Hills Nature Center
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to creating opportunities to build
social capital through community engagement.
Supporting documents: None.
Prepared by: Amanda Scott-Lerdal, deputy city clerk
Reviewed by: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk
Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: February 17, 2026
Minutes: 4a
Unofficial minutes
City council meeting
St. Louis Park, Minnesota
Feb. 2, 2026
1. Call to order.
Mayor Mohamed called the meeting to order at 6:15 p.m.
a. Pledge of allegiance
b. Roll call
Council members present: Daniel Bashore, Sue Budd, Tim Brausen, Yolanda Farris, Mayor Nadia
Mohamed
Council members absent: Jim Engelking, Paul Baudhuin
Staff present: senior planner (Ms. Chamberlain), associate planner (Ms. Champoux), public
works director (Mr. Hall), engineering director (Ms. Heiser), city manager (Ms. Keller), city
attorney (Mr. Mattick), economic development manager (Ms. Monson), deputy city clerk (Ms.
Scott-Lerdal), deputy engineering director (Mr. Sullivan), parks and recreation director (Mr.
West), engineering project manager (Mr. Wiesen)
2. Approve agenda.
It was moved by Council Member Farris, seconded by Council Member Brausen, to approve the
agenda as presented.
The motion passed 5-0 (Council Members Engelking and Baudhuin absent).
3. Presentations.
a. Proclamation observing Black History Month
Mayor Mohamed read a proclamation recognizing February 2026 as Black History Month. The
proclamation acknowledged the significant contributions Black Americans have made to the
nation's culture, politics, workplace, medicine, science, economics, business, education, arts
and legacy. It also highlighted their courageous work for civil rights despite consequences and
noted that St. Louis Park celebrates Juneteenth annually.
Mayor Mohamed reflected on how Black Americans have taught valuable lessons about
resistance and challenging racist ideologies that don't work for the entirety of America.
Council Member Farris expressed that the month should inspire people not only to remember
history, but also to learn from it and act with purpose. She shared a personal experience of still
encountering prejudice in everyday situations and encouraged everyone to try to be better.
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 4a) Page 2
Title: City council meeting minutes of February 2, 2026
Mayor Mohamed acknowledged with sadness that respect can end when council members step
away from the dais.
Council Member Budd highlighted the rich resource section compiled by staff related to Black
History Month, available in the agenda packet for all to access.
b. Recognition of donations.
Mayor Mohamed acknowledged a donation of $4,000 from the American Legion Post 282
through the Community Charities of Minnesota to support the police department's K9 program.
4. Minutes.
a. Study session meeting minutes of January 12, 2026
b. City council meeting minutes of January 20, 2026
c. Special study session meeting minutes of January 20, 2026
It was moved by Council Member Budd, seconded by Council Member Bashore to approve the
Jan. 12, 2026, special study session meeting minutes, the Jan. 20, 2026, city council meeting
minutes and the Jan. 20, 2026 special study session meeting minutes as presented.
The motion passed 5-0 (Council Members Engelking and Baudhuin absent).
5. Consent items.
a. Approve city disbursements
b. Resolution No. 26-015 accepting a donation to the city to support the police
department's K9 program
c. Resolution No. 26-016 accepting a donation to the city for Rita Vorpahl to attend the
2026 Minnesota Public Employer Labor Relations Association winter conference
d. Resolution No. 26-017 approving annual liquor license renewals
e. Resolution No. 26-018 approving Hennepin County Residential Waste Reduction and
Recycling Grant agreement
f. Approve 2025 Pay Equity Report
Council Member Brausen noted a resolution accepting a donation for Rita Vorpahl, Human
Resources Director, to attend the 2026 Minnesota Public Employer Labor Relations Association
Winter Conference and thanked the benefactor for their generosity. He also pointed out that
the city council was approving annual liquor license renewals for 63 different establishments in
St. Louis Park. He congratulated these establishments for successful legal compliance and
encouraged residents to support local restaurants during difficult economic times.
Mayor Mohamed echoed the sentiment about supporting small businesses.
It was moved by Council Member Brausen, seconded by Council Member Farris, to approve the
consent items as listed; and to waive reading of all resolutions and ordinances.
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 4a) Page 3
Title: City council meeting minutes of February 2, 2026
The motion passed 5-0 (Council Members Engelking and Baudhuin absent).
6. Public hearing.
a. Public hearing for Greenway-Cedar Trail Connection and Streambank Restoration
project (4025-2000) - Ward 2
Mr. Sullivan presented the staff report. He introduced Mr. Michael Haymen from the
Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, with whom the city is partnering for the project.
Mr. Haymen provided background on the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District's work in the
community, explaining they are a special purpose unit of government tasked with protecting
natural resources in their 178 square mile watershed spanning 29 communities. He described
past projects in the area including work with Methodist Hospital, Japs-Olson Company,
Minnehaha Creek Preserve and Cottageville Park. Mr. Haymen highlighted how these projects
have improved water quality, increased flood storage, addressed contamination and provided
better access to green space.
Mr. Sullivan stated this project would create a quarter-mile multi-use paved trail to fill the gap
between Methodist Hospital and the Cedar Lake Regional Trail. The trail would be maintained
year-round, includes bank stabilization and restoration where appropriate, and would cost
approximately $415,000 for the city's share after a $200,000 grant from Hennepin County. The
cost exceeded the $300,000 identified in the Capital Improvements Projects fund, but the
finance department confirmed sufficient capacity within the 2026 capital improvement budget.
Council Member Bashore asked where the trail would connect on the eastern side. Mr. Sullivan
explained it would be north of the Japs Olson company property near Powell Road.
Council Member Brausen asked for clarity regarding tree and buckthorn removal. Mr. Sullivan
confirmed this work would occur on the south side of the creek, with buckthorn removal on the
easterly end and select removal of box elder and cottonwood trees further west.
Council Member Brausen confirmed that the watershed district is supportive of the city's
pending bonding request for the Louisiana-Oxford project.
Council Member Budd asked where the trail crossing at Oxford Street was planned. Mr. Sullivan
explained it would be an at-grade crossing with future improvements planned as part of a
larger project.
Mayor Mohamed opened the public hearing.
Mr. Andy Willette, 2541 Rhode Island Avenue South, spoke briefly in support of the project. As
a bike commuter, he felt the proposed trail was a critical connection that would benefit the city
and people who do not use cars.
Ms. Janet Kimmerle, a new resident of St. Louis Park, expressed concerns about pedestrian
safety. She shared that prior to having been struck by a vehicle, she had been an avid walker.
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 4a) Page 4
Title: City council meeting minutes of February 2, 2026
Her safety concerns included whether bikes or e-bikes and pedestrians would be sharing space
on the boardwalk. She also raised questions about the boardwalk's condition and how
buckthorn would be removed.
Mayor Mohamed closed the public hearing, noting that staff was available in the lobby to
address any questions from residents.
Mayor Mohamed reiterated that the city council will vote on this project at the meeting on
Tuesday, Feb. 17, 2026.
7. Regular business.
a. Resolutions No. 26-019 and 26-020 establishing the 2026 Pavement Management
Project (4026-1000) - Ward 1
Mr. Wiesen presented the staff report. Following the public hearing on Jan. 20, 2026, staff had
revised their recommendations after further consultation with fire, police and public works
departments.
The revised staff recommendation was to maintain existing street widths on all north-south
streets (Kentucky, Jersey, Idaho, Colorado and Brunswick Avenues) and reduce 29th Street from
30 feet to 26 feet only if a sidewalk is approved for the north side of the street. The
recommendation included prohibiting parking on the north side of 29th Street to address
seasonal emergency access and operational needs.
Mr. Wiesen addressed questions raised during the previous public hearing. Regarding snow
removal operations, he explained that neither 28th nor 29th Street is exempt from parking
restrictions during snow emergencies and the city does not have designated public parking
areas available during these events. He also detailed the proposed five-foot sidewalk on the
north side of 29th Street, explaining that it would include a four-foot boulevard in most areas to
minimize impacts to trees and private property.
The updated cost estimate for the entire project was $8.7 million, including an additional
$150,000-$200,000 for the revised plans.
Council Member Bashore asked for clarification regarding the recommended boulevard width.
Mr. Wiesen explained that while a boulevard width of five to six feet is typical, staff
recommends four feet to minimize impacts to trees and property. In some locations, it would
be reduced to three feet or even to zero at the back of the curb to preserve mature trees or
maintain adequate driveway lengths.
Council Member Bashore thanked staff and residents for their engagement in the process. He
expressed support for applying the Living Streets policy while acknowledging the unique
parking challenges in the neighborhood. He proposed an amendment to the resolution to
reduce the boulevard width from zero to four feet to zero to three feet to provide more room
for properties closer to 29th Street. He also recognized that snow removal on sidewalks would
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 4a) Page 5
Title: City council meeting minutes of February 2, 2026
create an additional burden for property owners and committed to addressing this issue in the
future.
Mayor Mohamed asked if the smaller street width would result in more snow being pushed
onto sidewalks. Mr. Wiesen noted that narrowing the street would result in less street snow
being pushed onto the boulevard. However, having only three feet of boulevard would provide
less space there to pile up snow.
Council Member Brausen supported the amended proposal, acknowledging that changes to
infrastructure can be difficult for residents but noting that staff does an excellent job balancing
safety concerns with neighborhood input. When possible, he prefers narrowing streets to
reduce pollution and runoff while increasing green spaces.
Mayor Mohamed stated she would not support the amendment to narrow the boulevard; her
intention is to remain aligned with how policies are applied in other neighborhoods.
It was moved by Council Member Bashore, seconded by Council Member Farris, to approve
Resolution No. 26-019 establishing the 2026 pavement management project, approving the
plans and specifications, and authorizing advertisement for bids, with the modification that the
sidewalk design along 29th Street shall use a zero to three-foot boulevard as amended, and
Resolution No. 26-020 to install no parking signage on the north side of 29th Street between
Louisiana Avenue and Brunswick Avenue as presented.
The motion passed 4-1 (Mayor Mohamed opposed, Council Members Engelking and Baudhuin
absent).
b. Resolution No. 26-021 authorizing a conditional use permit for a religious institution at
6805 Minnetonka Boulevard - Ward 3
Ms. Champoux presented the staff report.
The church at 6805 Minnetonka Boulevard plans to renovate the interior of the sanctuary and
community spaces, expand the sanctuary by approximately 500 square feet, and replace
pavement on the north and west sides of the building with green space. The project would
reduce hardcover on the site from 75% to 59%, add 30 trees and 172 shrubs, and bring the site
into compliance with electric vehicle charging and bicycle parking requirements.
The church requested a parking reduction from 98 to 85 spaces, which would be met through
60 off-street spaces, with potential for 12 proof-of-parking spaces and 13 on-street spaces. Ms.
Champoux noted that the church has an ongoing shared parking agreement with the Lenox
Community Center, though it does not meet the city's standards for a permanent easement.
Council Member Budd asked if church patrons parking at the Lenox Community Center would
be ticketed. Pastor Andrew Peterson explained they have a mutual shared parking agreement
where the church uses the Lenox lot on Sundays while the community center uses the church
lot during the week when needed.
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 4a) Page 6
Title: City council meeting minutes of February 2, 2026
Council Member Bashore noted that he lives near the property and can personally attest to the
smooth parking situation on Sundays.
It was moved by Council Member Budd, seconded by Mayor Mohamed, to approve Resolution
No. 26-021 for a conditional use permit to allow a religious institution and a parking
requirement reduction at 6805 Minnetonka Boulevard.
The motion passed 5-0 (Council Members Engelking and Baudhuin absent).
c. Resolutions No. 26-022, 26-023 and 26-024 rescinding previous approvals, approving
preliminary and final plat and approving variance for 5430 Minnetonka Boulevard –
Ward 1
Ms. Champoux presented the staff report. The property at 5430 Minnetonka Boulevard, a
vacant 1.1-acre site, was previously used as a gas station and later acquired by MnDOT for
reconstruction of the southbound Highway 100 off-ramp.
The proposal is to redevelop the site with a three-story, 33-unit apartment building with
underground and surface parking. The project would include a public trail to the east of the
property connecting Minnetonka Boulevard and Utica Avenue South. The applicant, SELA
Investments, requested a variance to allow an 11-foot minimum front yard setback instead of
the required 25 feet, though this would only apply to the underground portion of the building.
Ms. Champoux explained that the variance was justified due to the ten-foot elevation change
across the site and the need to meet shadow ordinance requirements by shifting the building
south. The project would exceed landscaping requirements by planting 57 trees and 365
shrubs.
Council Member Bashore asked if the development would be affected by potential changes to
the intersection as part of the Minnetonka Boulevard redevelopment. Ms. Champoux
confirmed that staff and Hennepin County had no concerns about impacts.
Council Member Budd asked about soil contamination from the former gas station. Ms.
Champoux confirmed there are contaminated soils that will need to be properly removed and
disposed of during construction.
Ms. Barb Patterson, Browndale neighborhood, commented that she was disappointed the
development did not include affordable housing and that the plantings were not specifically
described as native plantings, which would promote wildlife diversity.
Council Member Bashore expressed support for the project, noting that SELA has a history of
good property management in St. Louis Park. He addressed a resident concern about traffic
impacts, suggesting that the apartment would likely generate less traffic than the former gas
station.
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 4a) Page 7
Title: City council meeting minutes of February 2, 2026
Council Member Brausen shared his disappointment about the lack of affordable housing but
acknowledged the applicant had followed all ordinance requirements and the proposal would
add needed market-rate housing to the community.
Mayor Mohamed also supported the project despite preferences for affordable housing, noting
the housing crisis and the benefit of developing a long-empty lot.
Council Member Farris expressed similar sentiments, noting her disappointment about the lack
of affordable housing. She acknowledged the busy corner might not be ideal for families with
children.
It was moved by Council Member Bashore, seconded by Council Member Brausen, to rescind
previous special permit, conditional use permit and variance approvals for property located at
5430 Minnetonka Boulevard, approve the preliminary and final plat of Parkway on 5, and
approve a variance to allow a minimum front yard setback of 11 feet instead of the minimum
setback of 25 feet in the N2 zoning district.
The motion passed 5-0 (Council Members Engelking and Baudhuin absent).
8. Communications and announcements.
Mayor Mohamed noted that the previous day was World Hijab Day, which recognizes the
choices Muslim women make to wear hijabs.
Mayor Mohamed announced that the City of St. Louis Park has formed a coalition with 13
regional mayors to address concerns related to Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s
"Operation Metro Surge." The coalition is focusing on public safety, local control and economic
stability. The coalition has been working with city managers and police chiefs to develop
solutions at state and federal levels.
Council Member Budd mentioned attending the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District's launch
of their ten-year plan, where St. Louis Park was featured as one of three cities with successful
partnerships.
Council Member Bashore announced an upcoming winter fun event hosted by the Bronx Park
Neighborhood Association on Feb. 22, 2026, at Dakota Park.
9. Adjournment.
The meeting adjourned at 8:09 p.m.
______________________________________ ______________________________________
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Nadia Mohamed, mayor
These minutes were created with the assistance of a generative AI transcript service, then edited
and finalized by a city staff person.
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: February 17, 2026
Consent agenda item: 5a
Executive summary
Title: Resolution approving funding for community education programs
Recommended action: Motion to approve payment to the St. Louis Park school district for
community education programming services.
Policy consideration: Does the city council wish to continue this agreement with the school
district?
Summary: On Jan. 25, 1971, the city and school district established an agreement to jointly
operate community education programs. This agreement was revised in 1973, 1979 and 1992.
The agreement states the city and school district shall work cooperatively to operate
community education programs. This is a unique agreement that has the city and school district
paying each other for program delivery.
Community education funding allocation: Since 1992, the city’s annual payment to the St.
Louis Park School District community education has supported Community Schools, Adult
Enrichment, Youth Enrichment and Senior Programs at the following amounts:
Category
Community Schools $37,752
Adult Enrichment $14,800
Youth Enrichment $22,948
Senior Programs $111,900
Total $187,400
The school district, in turn, provides $89,404 to the Parks and Recreation Department for field
use, parks, etc. Of the $89,404 total, $44,702 is allocated to the Park Improvement Fund, with
the remaining $44,702 deposited in the general fund. In total, the city pays the school district
$187,400 annually and the school district pays the city $89,404. State statutes and city financial
policies require that all payments over $175,000 must be approved by the city council.
Financial or budget considerations: The $187,400 payment is a part of the Parks and
Recreation’s organized recreation budget.
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to creating opportunities to build
social capital through community engagement.
Supporting documents: Resolution
Prepared by: Stacy M. Voelker, administrative coordinator
Reviewed by: Jason T. West, director of parks and recreation; Amelia Cruver, finance director
Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5a) Page 2
Title: Resolution approving funding for community education programs
Resolution No. 26-___
Authorizing payment to Independent School District 283
for Community Education services
Whereas, the City of St. Louis Park City Council approved an agreement between the
City of St. Louis Park and Independent School District 283 in 1992 relating to governance of
community education programing; and
Whereas, the school district is organized for the purpose of providing public school
education, including, at its discretion, public evening schools, as well as adult and continuing
education programs and associated recreation programs; and
Whereas, the city is authorized and does provide recreation and civic programs within
its geographical boundaries; and
Whereas, the school district and city, within their respective powers, cooperate in the
operation of a community education program within the total area encompassed by the
boundaries of the city and school district; and
Whereas, at this time, the city pays the school district $187,400 and the school district
pays the city $ 89,404; and
Whereas, all personnel hired to establish and operate the community education
program are paid and supervised by the school district,
Now therefore be it resolved that the City of St. Louis Park authorizes a total of
$187,400 payment to Independent School District 283 for community education programming
services.
Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council February 17, 2026:
Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: February 17, 2026
Consent agenda item: 5b
Executive summary
Title: Resolution accepting donations to the city to support Westwood Hills Nature Center
programs
Recommended action: Motion to adopt a resolution accepting a donation of $20 to the city to
support Westwood Hills Nature Center programs or park enhancements and two Jim Hautman
prints to the city for display at Westwood Hills Nature Center.
Policy consideration: Does the city council wish to accept the donations with restrictions on
their use?
Summary: State statute requires city council’s acceptance of donations. This requirement is
necessary in order to make sure the city council has knowledge of any restrictions placed on the
use of each donation prior to it being expensed.
• Donation for park enhancements or program needs at Westwood Hills Nature Center
o Carl Lundstrom, $20
• Donation of prints to display at Westwood Hills Nature Center
o Bob Fields, two Jim Hautman prints
Financial or budget considerations: The monetary donation will be used for park
enhancements or program needs at Westwood Hills Nature Center. The prints are to display at
Westwood Hills Nature Center.
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to creating opportunities to build
social capital through community engagement.
Supporting documents: Resolution
Prepared by: Carrie Mandler, secretary program aide
Reviewed by: Stacy M. Voelker, administrative coordinator
Mark Oestreich, Westwood Hills Nature Center manager
Jason T. West, parks and recreation director
Amelia Cruver, finance director
Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5b) Page 2
Title: Resolution accepting donations to the city to support Westwood Hills Nature Center programs
Resolution No. 26 - ___
Approving acceptance of donations in the amount of $20
and two Jim Hautman prints to the
City of St. Louis Park for Westwood Hills Nature Center
Be it resolved by the city council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota as follows:
Whereas, the City of St. Louis Park is required by state statute to authorize acceptance
of any donations; and
Whereas, the city council must also ratify any restrictions placed on the donation by the
donor; and
Whereas, the donation from Carl Lundstrom is given to the city in the total amount
of $20 to support Westwood Hills Nature Center programs or park enhancements and the
donation of two Jim Hautman prints from Bob Fields is given to the city to display at
Westwood Hills Nature Center,
Now therefore be it resolved, by the city council of the City of St. Louis Park that the
gifts are hereby accepted with thanks and appreciation.
Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council February 17, 2026:
Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: February 17, 2026
Consent agenda item: 5c
Executive summary
Title: Approve city council travel for National League of Cities Congressional Cities Conference
2026
Recommended action: Motion to approve city council’s travel to the National League of Cities
conference in Washington, DC on March 16 - March 18, 2026, for the purposes of strategic
networking, professional development and meetings with state elected officials.
Policy consideration: None.
Summary: The administrative services department coordinates travel and costs associated with
attending out-of-state organizational conferences for council members. Conference attendance
and associated costs are budgeted annually, and travel by elected officials is approved by the
city council prior to travel when possible and appropriate as per Resolution No. 06-007.
The National League of Cities Congressional Cities conference will be attended by Council
Members Bashore, Brausen, Baudhuin, Farris and Mayor Mohamed. The conference offers a
full schedule of daily sessions where council members learn from qualified presenters and
network with more than 2,000 fellow attendees. The conference features two full days of
learning while connecting with fellow elected leaders and city staff. Topics are focused on city
government leadership education. The conference concludes with a full day of meetings
facilitated by Momentum Advocacy between council members and elected representatives. In
these meetings, city council members will discuss St. Louis Park’s priorities and infrastructure
investment needs.
The total estimated cost for attendance at the 2026 NLC Congressional Cities Conference is
$10,899.56.
Financial or budget considerations: Costs are included in the 2026 budget. Review and
approval of the information by council is required and provides another layer of oversight to
further ensure good fiscal stewardship.
Strategic priority consideration: All strategic priorities apply.
Supporting documents: None.
Prepared by: Amanda Scott-Lerdal, deputy city clerk
Reviewed by: Amelia Cruver, finance director
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk
Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: February 17, 2026
Consent agenda item: 5d
Executive summary
Title: Resolution authorizing final payment for 2024 Cedar Lake Road project (4023-1100) -
Ward 4
Recommended action: Motion to adopt resolution accepting work and authorizing final
payment in the amount of $91,004.29 for the 2024 Cedar Lake Road project with Eureka
Construction – City Contract No. 108-24.
Policy consideration: Not applicable
Summary: On May 20, 2024, the city council awarded a contract in the amount of
$7,377,584.50 to Eureka Construction for the 2024 Cedar Lake Road project (Cedar Lake Road
from Jordan Avenue to Rhode Island Avenue). This project reconstructed and narrowed the
roadway, constructed a new sidewalk on the south side of the road, built a one-way cycle track
on both sides of the road, installed rectangular rapid flashing beacons (RRFBs) at Flag Avenue
and Virginia Avenue, replaced approximately 50% of the watermain, and completed other
miscellaneous utility repairs.
The final contract amount, $7,816,396.51, is $438,812.01 (5.9%) more than the contract
amount awarded. Details on the contract changes are included in the discussion section of this
report.
Financial or budget considerations: The final cost of the work performed by the contractor
under contract no. 108-24 has been calculated as follows:
Original contract (based on estimated quantities) $ 7,377,584.50
Change orders/ extra work + $ 119,881.95
Quantity overruns + $ 318,930.06
Final contract cost $ 7,816,396.51
Previous payments - $ 7,725,392.22
Balance due $ 91,004.29
This project is included in the city’s Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for 2024. Funding will be
provided by the following sources: Municipal state aid (MSA), federal aid, state appropriation-
local road improvement program (LRIP) and utility funds.
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a variety of options for
people to make their way around the city comfortably, safely and reliably.
Supporting documents: Discussion, Resolution
Prepared by: Aaron Wiesen, engineering project manager
Reviewed by: Debra Heiser, engineering director; Amelia Cruver, finance director
Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Page 2
Title: Resolution authorizing final payment for 2024 Cedar Lake Road project (4023-1100) - Ward 4
Discussion
Background: The 2024 Cedar Lake Road project (Cedar Lake Road from Jordan Avenue to Rhode
Island Avenue) is complete, and staff is recommending closing out the contract. The project
reconstructed and narrowed the roadway, constructed a new sidewalk on the south side of the
road, built a one-way cycle track on both sides of the road, installed rectangular rapid flashing
beacons (RRFBs) at Flag Avenue and Virginia Avenue, replaced approximately 50% of the
watermain, and completed other miscellaneous utility repairs.
On May 20, 2024, the city council awarded the contract in the amount of $7,377,584.50 to
Eureka Construction for the 2024 Cedar Lake Road project. The final contract amount
($7,816,396.51) was 5.9% more than the contract amount. The additional costs are the result of
additional work and contract quantity overruns, which occurred when on-site conditions
required more materials and work than anticipated during project development. These added
$438,812.01 to the contract.
The contract changes and overruns were attributed to:
• Sanitary sewer modifications: During construction of the sanitary sewer, unforeseen
modifications to the structures and pipes were identified after excavation. These
changes were necessary and approved as extra work. Cost = $8,676.71. This work
was paid for local sanitary utility funds.
• Storm sewer modifications: During construction of the storm sewer, unforeseen
modifications to the structures and pipes were identified after excavation. These
changes were necessary and approved as extra work. Cost = $26,286.51. This work
was paid for using federal and/or MSA funds.
• Watermain modifications: During construction of the watermain, unforeseen
modifications to the hydrants, valves and pipes were identified after excavation.
These changes were necessary and approved as extra work. Cost = $7,169.78. This
work was paid for using local water utility funds.
• Traffic control modifications: Modifications were made to the traffic control and
permanent markings plan to address safety concerns, detour changes and ensure
quality permanent pavement markings. Cost = $37,146.42. This work was paid for
using federal and/or MSA funds.
• Landscaping and fences: Additional landscaping and fence repairs were identified
during construction and added to the project. Cost = $27,822.69. This work was paid
for using federal and/or state funds.
• Sidewalk: Additional removals were necessary to ensure the new sidewalk were ADA
complaint and tied into the existing grade properly. Cost = $9,793.34. This work was
paid for using federal and/or state funds.
• Signal system: Additional traffic signal work was necessary at the Texas Avenue/
Cedar Lake Road intersection. Cost = $2,986.50. This work was paid for using federal
and/or MSA funds.
Due to the nature of construction projects, unexpected costs do come up. These costs were
necessary to ensure quality street, sidewalk and utility infrastructure for years to come. The
additional contract costs have been reviewed with Finance.
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Page 3
Title: Resolution authorizing final payment for 2024 Cedar Lake Road project (4023-1100) - Ward 4
Financial or budget considerations:
Based on the final payment for phase 1 (project #4023-1100) and the low bid received for
phase 2 (project #4024-1100), cost and funding details are as follows for the Cedar Lake Road
and Louisiana Avenue project.
Cedar Lake Road/ Louisiana Avenue Improvement project overall project cost (2024-2026)
Project Nos: 4023-1100 and 4024-1100
Description 4023-1100 and
4024-1100
Overall CIP
Budget
4023-1100
Phase 1
(Final)
2024
Construction
4024-1100
Phase 2
(Low bid)
2025-2026
Construction
Overall
Phase 1 & 2
(Final + Low
bid)
Construction
$19,998,470.00
$7,816,396.51
$12,741,022.85
$20,557,419.36
Engineering and
administration
$5,734,500.00
$2,237,972.49
$3,470,537.59
$5,708,510.08
Land acquisition
$2,520,000.00
$434,965.45
$1,768,291.80
$2,203,257.25
Total:
$28,252,970.00
$10,489,334.45
$17,979,852.24
$28,469,186.69
Federal aid
$7,000,000.00
$2,264,000.00
$4,736,000.00
$7,000,000.00
Congressionally
directed spending
$2,000,000.00
$2,000,000.00
$0
$2,000,000.00
State
appropriation
(LRIP)
$5,000,000.00
$1,687,361.95
$3,312,638.05
$5,000,000.00
Municipal state
aid
$6,537,823.00
$2,469,426.01
$4,068,396.99
$6,537,823.00
General obligation
bonds
$3,120,207.00
$0.00
$3,217,480.74
$3,217,480.74
Local funds
$0.00
$0.00
$84,742.20
$84,742.20
Sanitary sewer fee
revenue
$50,000.00
$23,880.71
$325,098.00
$348,978.71
Watermain
revenue bond
proceeds
$3,403,470.00 $1,239,188.34
$1,899,503.70
$3,138,692.04
Stormwater fee
revenue
$1,141,470.00
$805,477.44
$335,992.56
$1,141,470.00
Total:
$28,252,970.00
$10,489,334.45
$17,979,852.24
$28,469,186.69
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Page 4
Title: Resolution authorizing final payment for 2024 Cedar Lake Road project (4023-1100) - Ward 4
The final cost of the work performed by the contractor on phase 1 (project #4023-1100) under
Contract No. 108-24 has been calculated as follows:
Original contract (based on estimated quantities) $ 7,377,584.50
Change orders/ extra work + $ 119,881.95
Quantity overruns + $ 318,930.06
Final contract cost $ 7,816,396.51
Previous payments - $ 7,725,392.22
Balance due $ 91,004.29
This project was included in the city’s Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Funding will be provided
by the following sources: municipal state aid, federal aid, state appropriation (local road
improvement program), general obligation bonds and utility funds.
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5d) Page 5
Title: Resolution authorizing final payment for 2024 Cedar Lake Road project (4023-1100) - Ward 4
Resolution No. 26-____
Authorizing final payment
and accepting work for the
2024 Cedar Lake Road Project
City Project No. 4023-1100
Contract No. 108-24
Be it resolved by the city council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, as follows:
1. Pursuant to a written contract with the city dated May 20, 2024, Eureka
Construction has satisfactorily completed the 2024 Cedar Lake Road project, as per
Contract No. 108-24.
2. The engineering director has filed her recommendations for final acceptance of the
work.
3. The work completed under this contract is accepted and approved. The final
contract cost is $7,816,396.51.
4. The city manager is directed to make final payment in the amount of $91,004.29 on
this contract, taking the contractor's receipt in full.
Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council February 17, 2026:
Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: February 17, 2026
Consent agenda item: 5e
Executive summary
Title: Resolution authorizing agreement with MnDOT for TH 169 and Cedar Lake Road Project -
Ward 4
Recommended action: Motion to adopt a resolution authorizing the city to enter into a
cooperative construction agreement with the Minnesota Department of Transportation
(MnDOT) for the TH 169 and Cedar Lake Road project (City Project No. 4026-8000).
Policy consideration: None.
Summary: In 2026, MnDOT will be performing construction on Cedar Lake Road and Jordan
Avenue at TH 169, including:
• The replacement of the traffic signal at Jordan Avenue and Cedar Lake Road.
• The replacement of the pavement on Jordan Avenue between the TH 169 ramp and
Cedar Lake Road.
• The storm sewer that outlets under Jordan Avenue and into Hannon Lake will be
removed and replaced.
• The replacement of a section of city watermain is necessary for the storm sewer work.
• The construction of a new sidewalk along the east side of Jordan Avenue between the
TH 169 ramps and Cedar Lake Road.
On Sept. 2, 2025, the council passed a resolution approving a permanent drainage easement for
this project.
The city and state share responsibilities for the construction and maintenance of the roadway,
utilities, sidewalks and signals. MnDOT Agreement 1060462 provides detailed assignments and
descriptions of the respective responsibilities. The agreement is consistent with other
agreements currently in place for signals in St. Louis Park.
Financial or budget considerations: This project is included in the city's 2026 capital
improvement plan (CIP) for $360,000. After further refinement and updates from MnDOT, the
city’s share of the project cost is $561,134.22, which will be paid for using municipal state aid
funds, water utility fund and general obligation bonds (sidewalk).
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a variety of options for
people to make their way around the city comfortably, safely and reliably.
Supporting documents: Discussion
Resolution
MnDOT Agreement No. 1060462
Prepared by: Aaron Wiesen, engineering project manager
Reviewed by: Debra Heiser, engineering director; Amelia Cruver, finance director
Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5e) Page 2
Title: Resolution authorizing agreement with MnDOT for TH 169 and Cedar Lake Road Project - Ward 4
Discussion
Background: In 2026, MnDOT will be performing construction on Cedar Lake Road and Jordan
Avenue at TH 169. The project includes the replacement of signals, street pavement, and
underground utilities. The project also includes the construction of a new sidewalk along the
east side of Jordan Avenue between the TH 169 ramps and Cedar Lake Road.
The city and state share responsibilities for the construction and maintenance of the roadway,
utilities, sidewalks and signals. Operation, maintenance and replacement of this signal, utilities
and sidewalks are covered by an agreement between the City of St. Louis Park and MnDOT. As
laid out in the agreement, the city will participate in signal replacement costs based on the
number of legs of the signal under our jurisdiction. Due to this, the city is obligated to pay for
three-fourths of the cost to replace this signal system as part of this project. In addition, the city
is obligated to pay for the cost of watermain replacement and sidewalk installation.
Below is a breakdown of the cost and funding sources:
Funding source Cost
Signal replacement Municipal State Aid $463,186.04
Watermain replacement Water utility funds $61,319.74
Sidewalk General obligation bonds $36,628.44
Total $561,134.22
The agreement is consistent with other agreements currently in place for signals in St. Louis
Park.
Next steps: The schedule for MnDOT’s project is for construction to occur from June to
September 2026.
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5e) Page 3
Title: Resolution authorizing agreement with MnDOT for TH 169 and Cedar Lake Road Project - Ward 4
Resolution No. 26 -__
Authorizing the city to enter into a
cooperative construction agreement with the
Minnesota Department of Transportation
for the TH 169 and Cedar Lake Road Project
(MnDOT agreement no. 1060462)
Whereas, the Minnesota Department of Transportation will be performing grading,
bituminous paving, ADA improvements, signals, lighting, TMS and drainage construction and
other associated construction upon, along, and adjacent to Trunk Highway 169 at Cedar Lake
Road from Cedar Crest Road to Jordan Avenue according to State-prepared plans,
specifications, and special provisions designated by the State as State Project No. 2772-134;
and
Whereas, MnDOT has requested that the city enter into an agreement for the payment
and maintenance of the signal systems, utility replacement and sidewalk at the Cedar Lake
Road and Trunk Highway 169 ramps (MnDOT agreement no. 1060462),
Now therefore be it resolved by the city council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota,
that:
The city enters into MnDOT agreement no. 1060462 with the State of Minnesota,
Department of Transportation for the following purposes:
To provide for payment by the city to the state of the city’s share of the costs of the
signal systems, utility and sidewalk construction and other associated construction to be
performed upon, along, and adjacent to Trunk Highway 169 at Cedar Lake Road from
Cedar Crest Road to Jordan Avenue within the corporate city limits under State Project
No. 2772-134.
It is further resolved that the mayor and city manager are authorized to execute the
agreement and any amendments to the agreement.
Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council February 17, 2026:
Kim Keller, city manager
Nadia Mohamed, mayor
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk
MnDOT Contract: 1060462
-1-
Three-Party Receivable Standard with Signal
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
AND
CITY OF MINNETONKA
AND
CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK
COOPERATIVE CONSTRUCTION
AGREEMENT
State Project Number: 2772-134
State Project Number: 2772-134 (EP)
Trunk Highway Number: 169=383
State Aid Project Number: 142-155-004
State Aid Project Number: 163-010-040
Federal Project Number: NHPP 0169(363)
Signal System IDs: 21966058, 21966059
Minnetonka Estimated Amount Receivable
$446,444.40
St. Louis Park Estimated Amount
Receivable
$561,134.22
This Agreement is between the State of Minnesota, acting through its Commissioner of Transportation ("State"), the
City of Minnetonka, acting through its City Council ("Minnetonka"), and the City of St. Louis Park, acting through its
City Council ("St. Louis Park").
Recitals
1.The State will perform grading, bituminous mill and overlay, ADA improvements, signals, lighting, TMS, and
drainage construction and other associated construction upon, along, and adjacent to Trunk Highway
(TH) 169 at Cedar Lake Road and from Cedar Crest Road East to Jordan Avenue South according to
State-prepared plans, specifications, and special provisions designated by Minnetonka as State Aid Project
(SAP) 142-155-004, by St. Louis Park as SAP 163-010-040, and by the State as State Project (SP) 2772-134
(TH 169=383) ("Project"); and
2.Minnetonka will participate in the costs of the signal construction at the TH 169 and Cedar Lake Road west
ramp and associated construction engineering; and
3.St. Louis Park has requested the State include in its Project sidewalk construction, and
4.St. Louis Park requests that it perform certain aspects of the construction engineering in connection with the
watermain construction and the State concurs in that request; and
5.St. Louis Park will participate in the costs of the sidewalk, watermain, and signal construction and associated
State-performed construction engineering at the TH 169 and Cedar Lake Road east ramp; and
6.Minnesota Statutes § 161.45, subdivision 2, allows for City-owned utility relocation to be included in a State
construction contract, and payment by the City for such relocation according to applicable statutes and rules
for utilities on trunk highways; and
7.Minnesota Statutes § 161.20, subdivision 2 authorizes the Commissioner of Transportation to make
arrangements with and cooperate with any governmental authority for the purposes of constructing,
maintaining, and improving the trunk highway system.
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5e)
Title: Resolution authorizing agreement with MnDOT for TH 169 and Cedar Lake Road Project - Ward 4 Page 4
MnDOT Contract: 1060462
-2-
Three-Party Receivable Standard with Signal
Agreement
1. Term of Agreement; Survival of Terms; Plans; Incorporation of Exhibits
1.1. Effective Date. This Agreement will be effective on the date the State obtains all signatures required by
Minnesota Statutes § 16C.05, subdivision 2.
1.2. Expiration Date. This Agreement will expire when all obligations have been satisfactorily fulfilled.
1.3. Survival of Terms. All clauses which impose obligations continuing in their nature and which must survive
in order to give effect to their meaning will survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement,
including, without limitation, the following clauses: 3. Maintenance by Minnetonka; 4. Maintenance by
St. Louis Park; 13. Liability; Worker Compensation Claims; 15. State Audits; 16. Government Data Practices;
17. Governing Law; Jurisdiction; Venue; and 19. Force Majeure. The terms and conditions set forth in
Article 5. Signal System and EVP System Operation and Maintenance in Minnetonka and Article 6. Signal
System and EVP System Operation and Maintenance in St. Louis Park will survive the expiration of this
Agreement, but may be terminated by another Agreement between the parties.
1.4. Plans, Specifications, and Special Provisions. Plans, specifications, and special provisions designated by
the State as SP 2772-134 (TH 169=383) are on file in the office of the Commissioner of Transportation at
Saint Paul, Minnesota, and incorporated into this Agreement by reference ("Project Plans").
1.5. Exhibits. The Preliminary Schedule "I" is on file in the office of the Minnetonka City Engineer, in the office
of the St. Louis Park Engineering Director, and attached and incorporated into this Agreement.
2. Construction by the State
2.1. Contract Award. The State will advertise for bids and award a construction contract to the lowest
responsible bidder according to the Project Plans.
2.2. Direction, Supervision, and Inspection of Construction
A. Supervision and Inspection by the State. The State will direct and supervise all construction activities
performed under the construction contract and, except as provided below, perform all construction
engineering and inspection functions in connection with the contract construction. All contract
construction will be performed according to the Project Plans.
B. Construction Engineering and Inspection by St. Louis Park. St. Louis Park will assign its City Engineer or
other registered professional engineer to perform construction engineering in connection with the
watermain construction. The engineer so assigned will act under the supervision and direction of the
State and be responsible for construction inspection and associated documentation for said
construction. The construction will be performed according to the Project Plans and recognized and
accepted practices and procedures as set forth in various State manuals, including Specifications
No. 1601 through and including No. 1609 in the State's current Standard Specifications for
Construction. St. Louis Park will furnish other personnel, services, supplies, and equipment needed to
properly carry on the construction.
i. Documentation of Construction Costs. At regular intervals after the State's contractor has started
the watermain construction, St. Louis Park will prepare partial estimates of the construction costs
according to the terms of the construction contract and immediately submit the partial estimates
to the State. St. Louis Park will also prepare the final estimate data for said construction and submit
the final estimate to the State. Quantities listed on the partial and final estimates will be
documented according to guidelines in the applicable documentation manual.
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5e)
Title: Resolution authorizing agreement with MnDOT for TH 169 and Cedar Lake Road Project - Ward 4 Page 5
MnDOT Contract: 1060462
-3-
Three-Party Receivable Standard with Signal
ii. Final Inspection of Construction. Upon completion of the watermain construction, St. Louis Park
will advise the State whether or not said construction should be accepted by the State as being
performed in a satisfactory manner. If St. Louis Park recommends that the State not accept the
construction, then St. Louis Park will, as part of their recommendation, identify the specific defects
in the construction and the reasons why it should not be accepted. Any recommendations made by
St. Louis Park are not binding on the State. The State will determine, after considering the St. Louis
Park 's recommendations, whether or not the construction has been properly performed and
whether to accept or reject it.
i. Inspection of Other St. Louis Park Participation Construction. The remainder of the St. Louis Park
participation construction covered under this Agreement will be open to inspection by the
St. Louis Park. If St. Louis Park believes the St. Louis Park participation construction covered under
this Agreement has not been properly performed or that the construction is defective,
St. Louis Park will inform the State District Engineer's authorized representative in writing of those
defects. Any recommendations made by St. Louis Park are not binding on the State. The State will
have the exclusive right to determine whether the State's contractor has satisfactorily performed
the St. Louis Park participation construction covered under this Agreement.
C. Inspection by Minnetonka. The Minnetonka participation construction covered under this Agreement
will be open to inspection by Minnetonka. If Minnetonka believes the Minnetonka participation
construction covered under this Agreement has not been properly performed or that the construction
is defective, Minnetonka will inform the State District Engineer's authorized representative in writing of
those defects. Any recommendations made by Minnetonka are not binding on the State. The State will
have the exclusive right to determine whether the State's contractor has satisfactorily performed the
Minnetonka participation construction covered under this Agreement.
2.3. Plan Changes, Additional Construction, Etc.
A. The State will make changes in the Project Plans and contract construction, which may include the
Minnetonka and St. Louis Park participation construction covered under this Agreement, and will enter
into any necessary addenda and change orders with the State's contractor that are necessary to cause
the contract construction to be performed and completed in a satisfactory manner. The State District
Engineer's authorized representative will inform the appropriate Minnetonka and St. Louis Park officials
of any proposed addenda and change orders to the construction contract that will affect the
Minnetonka and St. Louis Park participation construction covered under this Agreement.
B. Minnetonka or St. Louis Park may request additional work or changes to the work in the plans as part of
the construction contract. Such request will be made by an exchange of letter(s) with the State. If the
State determines that the requested additional work or plan changes are necessary or desirable and
can be accommodated without undue disruption to the Project, the State will cause the additional
work or plan changes to be made.
2.4. Satisfactory Completion of Contract. The State will perform all other acts and functions necessary to cause
the construction contract to be completed in a satisfactory manner.
2.5. Permits. St. Louis Park will submit to the State's Utility Engineer an original permit application for all
utilities owned by St. Louis Park to be constructed hereunder that are upon and within the Trunk Highway
Right-of-Way. Applications for permits will be made on State form "Application For Utility Permit On Trunk
Highway Right-of-Way" (Form 2525).
2.6. Utility Adjustments. Adjustments to certain Minnetonka or St. Louis Park-owned facilities, including but
not limited to, valve boxes and frame and ring castings, may be performed by the State's contractor under
the construction contract. Minnetonka and St. Louis Park will furnish the contractor with new units and/or
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5e)
Title: Resolution authorizing agreement with MnDOT for TH 169 and Cedar Lake Road Project - Ward 4 Page 6
MnDOT Contract: 1060462
-4-
Three-Party Receivable Standard with Signal
parts for those in place Minnetonka or St. Louis Park-owned facilities when replacements are required and
not covered by a contract pay item, without cost or expense to the State or the contractor, except for
replacement of units and/or parts broken or damaged by the contractor.
3. Maintenance by Minnetonka
Upon completion of the Project, Minnetonka will provide the following without cost or expense to the State:
3.1. Municipal Utilities. Maintenance of any municipal-owned utilities construction within the Minnetonka city
limits, without cost or expense to the State.
3.2. Sidewalks. Maintenance of any sidewalk construction within the Minnetonka city limits, including stamped
and colored concrete sidewalk (if any) and pedestrian ramps. Maintenance includes, but is not limited to,
snow, ice and debris removal, patching, crack repair, panel replacement, cross-street pedestrian crosswalk
markings, vegetation control of boulevards (if any), and any other maintenance activities necessary to
perpetuate the sidewalks in a safe, useable, and aesthetically acceptable condition.
The State will maintain crosswalk markings, if any, on the Trunk Highway at ramps which intersect with
Minnetonka roads.
3.3. Additional Drainage. No party to this Agreement will drain any additional drainage volume into the storm
sewer facilities constructed under the construction contract that was not included in the drainage for
which the storm sewer facilities were designed, without first obtaining written permission to do so from
the owner of the storm sewer facilities.
4. Maintenance by St. Louis Park
Upon completion of the Project, St. Louis Park will provide the following without cost or expense to the State:
4.1. Storm Sewers. Routine maintenance of any storm sewer facilities construction within the St. Louis Park city
limits. Routine maintenance includes, but is not limited to, removal of sediment, debris, vegetation, and
ice from grates and catch basins, and any other maintenance activities necessary to preserve the facilities
and to prevent conditions such as flooding, erosion, or sedimentation; this also includes informing the
District Maintenance Engineer of any needed repairs.
4.2. Municipal Utilities. Maintenance of any municipal-owned utilities construction within the St. Louis Park
city limits, without cost or expense to the State.
4.3. Sidewalks. Maintenance of any sidewalk construction within the St. Louis Park city limits, including
stamped and colored concrete sidewalk (if any) and pedestrian ramps. Maintenance includes, but is not
limited to, snow, ice and debris removal, patching, crack repair, panel replacement, cross-street pedestrian
crosswalk markings, vegetation control of boulevards (if any), and any other maintenance activities
necessary to perpetuate the sidewalks in a safe, useable, and aesthetically acceptable condition.
The State will maintain crosswalk markings, if any, on the Trunk Highway at ramps which intersect with
St. Louis Park roads.
4.4. Retaining Wall. Ownership and maintenance of the retaining wall construction in the southeast quadrant
of the Jordan Avenue South and Cedar Lake Road intersection. Maintenance includes graffiti removal and
any other maintenance activities necessary to perpetuate the wall in a safe, usable, and aesthetically
acceptable condition.
4.5. Additional Drainage. No party to this Agreement will drain any additional drainage volume into the storm
sewer facilities constructed under the construction contract that was not included in the drainage for
which the storm sewer facilities were designed, without first obtaining written permission to do so from
the owner of the storm sewer facilities.
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5e)
Title: Resolution authorizing agreement with MnDOT for TH 169 and Cedar Lake Road Project - Ward 4 Page 7
MnDOT Contract: 1060462
-5-
Three-Party Receivable Standard with Signal
5. Signal System and EVP System Operation and Maintenance in Minnetonka
Operation and maintenance responsibilities will be as follows for the Signal System and EVP System at Jordan
Avenue South/TH 169 West Ramp and Cedar Lake Road and for the Interconnect into the State's fiber network.
5.1. Minnetonka Responsibilities
A. Power. Minnetonka will be responsible for the hook-up cost and application to secure an adequate
power supply to the service pads or poles and will pay all monthly electrical service expenses necessary
to operate the Signal System, EVP System, and Interconnect.
B. Minor Signal System Maintenance. Minnetonka will provide for the following, without cost to the
State.
i. Maintain the signal pole mounted LED luminaires, including replacing the luminaires when
necessary. The LED luminaire must be replaced when it fails or when light levels drop below
recommended AASHTO levels for the installation.
ii. Replace the Signal System LED indications. Replacing LED indications consists of replacing each LED
indication when it reaches end of life per the MnDOT Traffic Engineering Manual or fails or no
longer meets Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) standards for light output.
iii. Replace the LED lamps in enforcement lights.
iv. Clean the Signal System controller cabinet and service cabinet exteriors.
v. Clean and paint the Signal System and luminaire mast arm extensions. The painted equipment will
undergo visual inspection over its lifespan by the State. In the event the State determines the
equipment requires repainting, the City will be responsible for performing repainting in a timely
manner. Painting will be in accordance with MnDOT Standard Specification 2565.3U, unless
approved by the State's District Traffic Engineer. If the City does not comply with the maintenance
terms as stated, the State may include a “Paint Signal System(s)” pay item in the next project at the
subject location(s) at 100 percent City cost.
vi. Paint and maintain the cross-street pedestrian crosswalk markings.
5.2. State Responsibilities
A. Interconnect; Timing; Other Maintenance. The State will maintain the Interconnect and signing, and
perform all other Signal System, APS, and signal pole luminaire circuit maintenance without cost to
Minnetonka. All Signal System timing will be determined by the State, and no changes will be made
without the State's approval.
B. EVP System Operation. The EVP System will be installed, operated, maintained, and removed according
to the following conditions and requirements:
i. All maintenance of the EVP System must be done by State forces.
ii. Emitter units may be installed only on authorized emergency vehicles, as defined in Minnesota
Statutes § 169.011, Subdivision 3. Authorized emergency vehicles may use emitter units only when
responding to an emergency. Minnetonka will provide the State's District Engineer or their
designated representative a list of all vehicles with emitter units, if requested by the State.
iii. Malfunction of the EVP System must be reported to the State immediately.
iv. In the event the EVP System or its components are, in the opinion of the State, being misused or
the conditions set forth in Paragraph ii. above are violated, and such misuse or violation continues
after Minnetonka receives written notice from the State, the State may remove the EVP System.
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5e)
Title: Resolution authorizing agreement with MnDOT for TH 169 and Cedar Lake Road Project - Ward 4 Page 8
MnDOT Contract: 1060462
-6-
Three-Party Receivable Standard with Signal
Upon removal of the EVP System pursuant to this Paragraph, all of its parts and components
become the property of the State.
v. All timing of the EVP System will be determined by the State.
5.3. Right-of-Way Access. Each party authorizes the other party to enter upon their respective public
right-of-way to perform the maintenance activities described in this Agreement.
5.4. Related Agreements. This Agreement will supersede and terminate the operation and maintenance terms
of any prior agreements between the parties for the intersection of Jordan Avenue South/TH 169 West
Ramp and Cedar Lake Road.
6. Signal System and EVP System Operation and Maintenance in St. Louis Park
Operation and maintenance responsibilities will be as follows for the Signal System and EVP System at Jordan
Avenue South/TH 169 East Ramp and Cedar Lake Road and for the Interconnect into the State's fiber network.
6.1. St. Louis Park Responsibilities
A. Power. St. Louis Park will be responsible for the hook-up cost and application to secure an adequate
power supply to the service pads or poles and will pay all monthly electrical service expenses necessary
to operate the Signal System, EVP System, and Interconnect.
B. Minor Signal System Maintenance. St. Louis Park will provide for the following, without cost to the
State.
i. Maintain the signal pole mounted LED luminaires, including replacing the luminaires when
necessary. The LED luminaire must be replaced when it fails or when light levels drop below
recommended AASHTO levels for the installation.
ii. Replace the Signal System LED indications. Replacing LED indications consists of replacing each LED
indication when it reaches end of life per the MnDOT Traffic Engineering Manual or fails or no
longer meets Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) standards for light output.
iii. Replace the LED lamps in enforcement lights.
iv. Clean the Signal System controller cabinet and service cabinet exteriors.
v. Clean and paint the Signal System and luminaire mast arm extensions. The painted equipment will
undergo visual inspection over its lifespan by the State. In the event the State determines the
equipment requires repainting, the City will be responsible for performing repainting in a timely
manner. Painting will be in accordance with MnDOT Standard Specification 2565.3U, unless
approved by the State's District Traffic Engineer. If the City does not comply with the maintenance
terms as stated, the State may include a “Paint Signal System(s)” pay item in the next project at the
subject location(s) at 100 percent City cost.
vi. Paint and maintain the cross-street pedestrian crosswalk markings.
6.2. State Responsibilities
A. Interconnect; Timing; Other Maintenance. The State will maintain the Interconnect and signing, and
perform all other Signal System, APS, and signal pole luminaire circuit maintenance without cost to
St. Louis Park. All Signal System timing will be determined by the State, and no changes will be made
without the State's approval.
B. EVP System Operation. The EVP System will be installed, operated, maintained, and removed according
to the following conditions and requirements:
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5e)
Title: Resolution authorizing agreement with MnDOT for TH 169 and Cedar Lake Road Project - Ward 4 Page 9
MnDOT Contract: 1060462
-7-
Three-Party Receivable Standard with Signal
i. All maintenance of the EVP System must be done by State forces.
ii. Emitter units may be installed only on authorized emergency vehicles, as defined in Minnesota
Statutes § 169.011, Subdivision 3. Authorized emergency vehicles may use emitter units only when
responding to an emergency. St. Louis Park will provide the State's District Engineer or their
designated representative a list of all vehicles with emitter units, if requested by the State.
iii. Malfunction of the EVP System must be reported to the State immediately.
iv. In the event the EVP System or its components are, in the opinion of the State, being misused or
the conditions set forth in Paragraph ii. above are violated, and such misuse or violation continues
after St. Louis Park receives written notice from the State, the State may remove the EVP System.
Upon removal of the EVP System pursuant to this Paragraph, all of its parts and components
become the property of the State.
v. All timing of the EVP System will be determined by the State.
6.3. Right-of-Way Access. Each party authorizes the other party to enter upon their respective public
right-of-way to perform the maintenance activities described in this Agreement.
6.4. Related Agreements. This Agreement will supersede and terminate the operation and maintenance terms
of any prior agreements between the parties for the intersection of Jordan Avenue South/TH 169 East
Ramp and Cedar Lake Road.
7. Basis of Minnetonka Cost
7.1. Schedule "I". The Preliminary Schedule "I" includes anticipated Minnetonka participation construction
items, State Furnished Materials lump sum amounts, Early Procurement Signal Pole Steel lump sum
amounts, and the construction engineering cost share covered under this Agreement, and is based on
engineer's estimated unit prices.
7.2. Minnetonka Participation Construction. Minnetonka will participate in the following at the percentages
indicated. The construction includes Minnetonka's proportionate share of item costs for Mobilization, Field
Office, and Traffic Control.
A. 100 Percent will be Minnetonka's rate of cost participation in all of the signal construction as shown on
Sheet 2 of the Preliminary Schedule "I."
7.3. Early Procurement Signal Pole Steel. The State will procure and furnish signal pole steel under State
Project 2772-134 (EP) ("Early Procurement Signal Pole Steel") to operate the traffic control signal system in
Minnetonka covered under this Agreement. Minnetonka's lump sum cost share for Early Procurement
Signal Pole Steel is $87,966.00, as shown in the Preliminary Schedule "I". The lump sum amount will be
revised based on contract bid prices.
7.4. Signal System Painting. Minnetonka will pay for painting of the Early Procurement Signal Pole Steel
furnished under State Project 2772-134 (EP) to operate the traffic control signal system in Minnetonka
covered under this Agreement. Minnetonka's lump sum cost share for signal pole painting is $12,337.00 as
shown in the Preliminary Schedule "I". The lump sum amount will be revised based on contract bid prices.
7.5. State Furnished Materials. The State will furnish the materials listed on Sheet 4 of the Preliminary
Schedule "I" ("State Furnished Materials"), according to the Project Plans, to operate the traffic control
signal system covered under this Agreement. Minnetonka's lump sum share for State Furnished Materials
is $72,914.79. Minnetonka's cost share for State Furnished Materials will be added to Minnetonka's total
construction cost share as shown in the Schedule "I."
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5e)
Title: Resolution authorizing agreement with MnDOT for TH 169 and Cedar Lake Road Project - Ward 4 Page 10
MnDOT Contract: 1060462
-8-
Three-Party Receivable Standard with Signal
7.6. Construction Engineering Costs. Minnetonka will pay a construction engineering charge equal to 8 percent
of the total Minnetonka participation construction covered under this Agreement.
7.7. Plan Changes, Additional Construction, Etc. Minnetonka will share in the costs of construction contract
addenda and change orders that are necessary to complete Minnetonka participation construction
covered under this Agreement, including any Minnetonka requested additional work and plan changes.
The State reserves the right to invoice Minnetonka for the cost of any additional Minnetonka requested
work and plan changes, construction contract addenda, change orders, and associated construction
engineering before the completion of the contract construction.
7.8. Liquidated Damages. All liquidated damages assessed the State's contractor in connection with the
construction contract will result in a credit shared by each party in the same proportion as their total
construction cost share covered under this Agreement is to the total contract construction cost before any
deduction for liquidated damages.
8. Minnetonka Cost and Payment by Minnetonka
8.1. Minnetonka Cost. $446,444.40 is Minnetonka's estimated share of the costs of the contract construction,
State Furnished Materials, Early Procurement Signal Pole Steel, and the construction engineering cost
share as shown in the Preliminary Schedule "I." The Preliminary Schedule "I" was prepared using
anticipated construction items and estimated quantities and unit prices and may include any credits or
lump sum costs. Upon award of the construction contract, the State will prepare a Revised Schedule "I"
based on construction contract construction items, quantities, and unit prices, which will replace and
supersede the Preliminary Schedule "I" as part of this Agreement.
8.2. Conditions of Payment. Minnetonka will pay the State Minnetonka's total estimated construction and
construction engineering cost share, as shown in the Revised Schedule "I," after the following conditions
have been met:
A. Execution of this Agreement and transmittal to Minnetonka, including a copy of the Revised
Schedule "I."
B. Minnetonka's receipt of a written request from the State for the advancement of funds.
8.3. Acceptance of Minnetonka's Cost and Completed Construction. The computation by the State of the
amount due from Minnetonka will be final, binding and conclusive. Acceptance by the State of the
completed contract construction will be final, binding, and conclusive upon Minnetonka as to the
satisfactory completion of the contract construction.
8.4. Final Payment by Minnetonka. Upon completion of all contract construction and upon computation of the
final amount due the State's contractor, the State will prepare a Final Schedule "I" and submit a copy to
Minnetonka. The Final Schedule "I" will be based on final quantities, and include all Minnetonka
participation construction items and the construction engineering cost share covered under this
Agreement. If the final cost of Minnetonka participation construction exceeds the amount of funds
advanced by Minnetonka, Minnetonka will pay the difference to the State without interest. If the final cost
of Minnetonka participation construction is less than the amount of funds advanced by Minnetonka, the
State will refund the difference to Minnetonka without interest.
The State and Minnetonka waive claims for any payments or refunds less than $5.00 according to
Minnesota Statutes § 15.415.
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5e)
Title: Resolution authorizing agreement with MnDOT for TH 169 and Cedar Lake Road Project - Ward 4 Page 11
MnDOT Contract: 1060462
-9-
Three-Party Receivable Standard with Signal
9. Basis of St. Louis Park Cost
9.1. Schedule "I". The Preliminary Schedule "I" includes anticipated St. Louis Park participation construction
items, State Furnished Materials lump sum amounts, Early Procurement Signal Pole Steel lump sum
amounts, and the construction engineering cost share covered under this Agreement, and is based on
engineer's estimated unit prices.
9.2. St. Louis Park Participation Construction. St. Louis Park will participate in the following at the percentages
indicated. The construction includes St. Louis Park's proportionate share of item costs for Mobilization,
Field Office, and Traffic Control.
A. 100 Percent will be St. Louis Park's rate of cost participation in all of the sidewalk, watermain, and
signal construction as shown on Sheet 3 of the Preliminary Schedule "I."
9.3. Early Procurement Signal Pole Steel. The State will procure and furnish signal pole steel under State
Project 2772-134 (EP) ("Early Procurement Signal Pole Steel") to operate the traffic control signal system in
St. Louis Park covered under this Agreement. St. Louis Park 's lump sum cost share for Early Procurement
Signal Pole Steel is $98,317.50, as shown in the Preliminary Schedule "I". The lump sum amount will be
revised based on contract bid prices.
9.4. Signal System Painting. St. Louis Park will pay for painting of the Early Procurement Signal Pole Steel
furnished under State Project 2772-134 (EP) to operate the traffic control signal system in St. Louis Park
covered under this Agreement. St. Louis Park's lump sum cost share for signal pole painting is $13,608.00
as shown in the Preliminary Schedule "I". The lump sum amount will be revised based on contract bid
prices.
9.5. State Furnished Materials. The State will furnish the materials listed on Sheet 4 of the Preliminary
Schedule "I" ("State Furnished Materials"), according to the Project Plans, to operate the traffic control
signal system covered under this Agreement. St. Louis Park's lump sum share for State Furnished Materials
is $72,914.79. St. Louis Park's cost share for State Furnished Materials will be added to St. Louis Park's total
construction cost share as shown in the Schedule "I."
9.6. Construction Engineering Costs. St. Louis Park will pay a construction engineering charge equal to
6 percent of the total watermain St. Louis Park participation construction covered under Article 9.2.
St. Louis Park will pay a construction engineering charge equal to 8 percent of the remainder of the
St. Louis Park participation construction covered under this Agreement.
9.7. Plan Changes, Additional Construction, Etc. St. Louis Park will share in the costs of construction contract
addenda and change orders that are necessary to complete St. Louis Park participation construction
covered under this Agreement, including any St. Louis Park requested additional work and plan changes.
The State reserves the right to invoice St. Louis Park for the cost of any additional St. Louis Park requested
work and plan changes, construction contract addenda, change orders, and associated construction
engineering before the completion of the contract construction.
9.8. Liquidated Damages. All liquidated damages assessed the State's contractor in connection with the
construction contract will result in a credit shared by each party in the same proportion as their total
construction cost share covered under this Agreement is to the total contract construction cost before any
deduction for liquidated damages.
10. St. Louis Park Cost and Payment by St. Louis Park
10.1. St. Louis Park Cost. $561,134.22 is St. Louis Park's estimated share of the costs of the contract
construction, State Furnished Materials, Early Procurement Signal Pole Steel, and the construction
engineering cost share as shown in the Preliminary Schedule "I." The Preliminary Schedule "I" was
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5e)
Title: Resolution authorizing agreement with MnDOT for TH 169 and Cedar Lake Road Project - Ward 4 Page 12
MnDOT Contract: 1060462
-10-
Three-Party Receivable Standard with Signal
prepared using anticipated construction items and estimated quantities and unit prices and may include
any credits or lump sum costs. Upon award of the construction contract, the State will prepare a Revised
Schedule "I" based on construction contract construction items, quantities, and unit prices, which will
replace and supersede the Preliminary Schedule "I" as part of this Agreement.
10.2. Conditions of Payment. St. Louis Park will pay the State St. Louis Park's total estimated construction and
construction engineering cost share, as shown in the Revised Schedule "I," after the following conditions
have been met:
A. Execution of this Agreement and transmittal to St. Louis Park, including a copy of the Revised
Schedule "I."
B. St. Louis Park's receipt of a written request from the State for the advancement of funds.
10.3. Acceptance of St. Louis Park's Cost and Completed Construction. The computation by the State of the
amount due from St. Louis Park will be final, binding and conclusive. Acceptance by the State of the
completed contract construction will be final, binding, and conclusive upon St. Louis Park as to the
satisfactory completion of the contract construction.
10.4. Final Payment by St. Louis Park. Upon completion of all contract construction and upon computation of
the final amount due the State's contractor, the State will prepare a Final Schedule "I" and submit a copy
to St. Louis Park. The Final Schedule "I" will be based on final quantities, and include all St. Louis Park
participation construction items and the construction engineering cost share covered under this
Agreement. If the final cost of St. Louis Park participation construction exceeds the amount of funds
advanced by St. Louis Park, St. Louis Park will pay the difference to the State without interest. If the final
cost of St. Louis Park participation construction is less than the amount of funds advanced by St. Louis
Park, the State will refund the difference to St. Louis Park without interest.
The State and St. Louis Park waive claims for any payments or refunds less than $5.00 according to
Minnesota Statutes § 15.415.
11. Authorized Representatives
Each party's Authorized Representative is responsible for administering this Agreement and is authorized to give
and receive any notice or demand required or permitted by this Agreement.
11.1. The State's Authorized Representative will be:
Name, Title: Malaki Ruranika, Cooperative Agreements Engineer (or successor)
Address: 395 John Ireland Boulevard, Mailstop 682, Saint Paul, MN 55155
Telephone: (651) 366-4634
Email: malaki.ruranika@state.mn.us
11.2. The Minnetonka's Authorized Representative will be:
Name, Title: Phil Olson, City Engineer (or successor)
Address: 14600 Minnetonka Boulevard, Minnetonka, MN 55345
Telephone: (952) 939-8239
Email: polson@minnetonkamn.gov
11.3. St. Louis Park's Authorized Representative will be:
Name, Title: Debra Heiser, Engineering Director (or successor)
Address: 5005 Minnetonka Boulevard, St. Louis Park, MN 55416
Telephone: (952) 924-2551
Email: dheiser@stlouisparkmn.gov
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5e)
Title: Resolution authorizing agreement with MnDOT for TH 169 and Cedar Lake Road Project - Ward 4 Page 13
MnDOT Contract: 1060462
-11-
Three-Party Receivable Standard with Signal
12. Assignment; Amendments; Waiver; Contract Complete
12.1. Assignment. No party may assign or transfer any rights or obligations under this Agreement without the
prior consent of the other party and a written assignment agreement, executed and approved by the same
parties who executed and approved this Agreement, or their successors in office. The foregoing does not
prohibit Minnetonka or St. Louis Park from contracting with a third-party to perform Minnetonka or
St. Louis Park maintenance responsibilities covered under this Agreement.
12.2. Amendments. Any amendment to this Agreement must be in writing and will not be effective until it has
been executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved the original Agreement, or
their successors in office.
12.3. Waiver. If a party fails to enforce any provision of this Agreement, that failure does not waive the
provision or the party's right to subsequently enforce it.
12.4. Contract Complete. This Agreement contains all prior negotiations and agreements between the State,
Minnetonka, and St. Louis Park. No other understanding regarding this Agreement, whether written or
oral, may be used to bind any party.
13. Liability; Worker Compensation Claims
13.1. Each party is responsible for its own acts, omissions and the results thereof to the extent authorized by law
and will not be responsible for the acts and omissions of others and the results thereof. Minnesota
Statutes § 3.736 and other applicable law govern liability of the State. Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466 and
other applicable law govern liability of Minnetonka and St. Louis Park.
13.2. Each party is responsible for its own employees for any claims arising under the Workers Compensation
Act.
14. Nondiscrimination
Provisions of Minnesota Statutes § 181.59 and of any applicable law relating to civil rights and discrimination are
considered part of this Agreement.
15. State Audits
Under Minnesota Statutes § 16C.05, subdivision 5, Minnetonka's and St. Louis Park 's books, records,
documents, and accounting procedures and practices relevant to this Agreement are subject to examination by
the State and the State Auditor or Legislative Auditor, as appropriate, for a minimum of six years from the end of
this Agreement.
16. Government Data Practices
Minnetonka, St. Louis Park, and the State must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act,
Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, as it applies to all data provided under this Agreement, and as it applies to all
data created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by Minnetonka and St. Louis Park
under this Agreement. The civil remedies of Minnesota Statutes §13.08 apply to the release of the data referred
to in this clause by either the Minnetonka, St. Louis Park, or the State.
17. Governing Law; Jurisdiction; Venue
Minnesota law governs the validity, interpretation, and enforcement of this Agreement. Venue for all legal
proceedings arising out of this Agreement, or its breach, must be in the appropriate state or federal court with
competent jurisdiction in Ramsey County, Minnesota.
18. Termination; Suspension
18.1. By Mutual Agreement. This Agreement may be terminated by mutual agreement of the parties.
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5e)
Title: Resolution authorizing agreement with MnDOT for TH 169 and Cedar Lake Road Project - Ward 4 Page 14
MnDOT Contract: 1060462
-12-
Three-Party Receivable Standard with Signal
18.2. Termination for Insufficient Funding. The State may immediately terminate this Agreement if it does not
obtain funding from the Minnesota Legislature, or other funding source; or if funding cannot be continued
at a level sufficient to allow for the performance of contract construction under the Project. Termination
must be by written or fax notice to Minnetonka and St. Louis Park.
18.3. Suspension. In the event of a total or partial government shutdown, the State may suspend this
Agreement and all work, activities, and performance of work authorized through this Agreement.
19. Force Majeure
No party will be responsible to the other for a failure to perform under this Agreement (or a delay in
performance) if such failure or delay is due to a force majeure event. A force majeure event is an event beyond a
party's reasonable control, including but not limited to, unusually severe weather, fire, floods, other acts of God,
labor disputes, acts of war or terrorism, or public health emergencies.
(The remainder of this page has been intentionally left blank.)
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5e)
Title: Resolution authorizing agreement with MnDOT for TH 169 and Cedar Lake Road Project - Ward 4 Page 15
MnDOT Contract: 1060462
-13-
Three-Party Receivable Standard with Signal
CITY OF MINNETONKA
The undersigned certify that they have lawfully
executed this contract on behalf of the Governmental
Unit as required by applicable charter provisions,
resolutions, or ordinances.
By:
Title:
Date:
By:
Title:
Date:
INCLUDE COPY OF RESOLUTION APPROVING THE AGREEMENT AND AUTHORIZING ITS EXECUTION.
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5e)
Title: Resolution authorizing agreement with MnDOT for TH 169 and Cedar Lake Road Project - Ward 4 Page 16
MnDOT Contract: 1060462
-14-
Three-Party Receivable Standard with Signal
CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK
The undersigned certify that they have lawfully
executed this contract on behalf of the Governmental
Unit as required by applicable charter provisions,
resolutions, or ordinances.
By:
Title:
Date:
By:
Title:
Date:
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Recommended for Approval:
By:
(District Engineer)
Date:
Approved:
By:
(State Design Engineer)
Date:
COMMISSIONER OF ADMINISTRATION
By:
(With Delegated Authority)
Date:
INCLUDE COPY OF RESOLUTION APPROVING THE AGREEMENT AND AUTHORIZING ITS EXECUTION.
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5e)
Title: Resolution authorizing agreement with MnDOT for TH 169 and Cedar Lake Road Project - Ward 4 Page 17
PRELIMINARY SCHEDULE "I"
Agreement 1060462
Cities of Minnetonka and St. Louis Park
SP 2772-134 (TH 169=383)Preliminary: December 9, 2025
SP 2772-134 (EP) (TH 169=383)
SAP 142-155-004, SAP 163-010-040
Federal Project NHPP 0169(363)
Grading, bituminous mill and overlay, ADA improvements, signals, lighting, TMS, and drainage construction located on TH 169 at Cedar Lake Road
and from Cedar Crest Road East to Jordan Avenue South, to start approximately March 2025 under State Contract ____ with ____
MINNETONKA COST PARTICIPATION
SAP 142-155-004 Work Items From Sheet 2 240,156.66
State Furnished Materials From Sheet 4 72,914.79
Early Procurement Signal Pole Steel Work Items From Sheet 5 87,966.00
Signal Painting Work Items From Sheet 5 12,337.00
Subtotal $413,374.45
Construction Engineering (8%)33,069.96
(1)Total Minnetonka Cost $446,444.40
(1) Amount of advance payment as described in Article 8 of the Agreement (estimated amount)
ST. LOUIS PARK COST PARTICIPATION
SAP 163-010-040 Work Items From Sheet 3 - 6% Construction Engineering 54,131.86
Construction Engineering (6%)3,247.91
Subtotal $57,379.78
SAP 163-010-040 Work Items From Sheet 3 - 8% Construction Engineering 281,599.01
State Furnished Materials From Sheet 4 72,914.79
Early Procurement Signal Pole Steel Work Items From Sheet 5 98,317.50
Signal Painting Work Items From Sheet 5 13,608.00
Subtotal 466,439.30
Construction Engineering (8%)37,315.14
Subtotal $503,754.44
(2)Total St. Louis Park Cost $561,134.22
(2) Amount of advance payment as described in Article 10 of the Agreement (estimated amount)
Data is considered Non-public prior to project award under the
Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13.- 1 -
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5e)
Title: Resolution authorizing agreement with MnDOT for TH 169 and Cedar Lake Road Project - Ward 4 Page 18
1060462(1) 100% CITY OF MINNETONKA FUNDS
ITEM SAP 142-155-004 UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COST
NUMBER WORK ITEM (1)
2021.501 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 0.08 275,934.56 22,074.76
2031.502 FIELD OFFICE EACH 0.08 52,394.69 4,191.57
2504.602 ADJUST GATE VALVE AND BOX EACH 1.00 1,285.78 1,285.78
2506.502 ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING EACH 2.00 1,442.74 2,885.48
2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 0.08 192,277.81 15,382.22
2565.501 EMERGENCY VEHICLE PREEMPTION SYSTEM A LUMP SUM 0.75 10,111.72 7,583.79
2565.516 TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEM A SYSTEM 0.75 249,004.07 186,753.05
TOTAL 240,156.66
(1)100% MINNETONKA $240,156.66
Data is considered Non-public prior to project award under the
Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13.- 2 -
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5e)
Title: Resolution authorizing agreement with MnDOT for TH 169 and Cedar Lake Road Project - Ward 4 Page 19
1060462(2) 100% CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK FUNDS
(P) PLAN QUANTITY
ITEM SAP 163-010-040 UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COST
NUMBER WORK ITEM (2)
2021.501 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 0.11 275,934.56 30,352.80
2031.502 FIELD OFFICE EACH 0.11 52,394.69 5,763.42
2104.502 REMOVE GATE VALVE AND BOX EACH 1.00 534.32 534.32
2104.502 REMOVE HYDRANT EACH 1.00 1,000.57 1,000.57
2104.503 REMOVE WATER MAIN LIN FT 110.00 19.21 2,113.23
2211.507 AGGREGATE BASE (CV) CLASS 6 (P)CU YD 173.00 32.58 5,636.72
2504.602 *CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER MAIN EACH 2.00 2,991.67 5,983.33
2504.602 *HYDRANT EACH 1.00 9,081.77 9,081.77
2504.602 *6" GATE VALVE AND BOX EACH 1.00 3,721.90 3,721.90
2504.603 *6" WATERMAIN DUCTILE IRON CL 52 LIN FT 10.00 213.87 2,138.70
2504.603 *12" WATERMAIN DUCTILE IRON CL 52 LIN FT 100.00 177.78 17,778.38
2504.604 *WATERMAIN INSULATION SQ YD 20.00 22.25 444.96
2504.608 *DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS POUND 500.00 24.19 12,097.35
2506.502 *ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING EACH 2.00 1,442.74 2,885.48
2521.518 6" CONCRETE WALK SQ FT 2,406.00 10.91 26,255.82
2521.602 DRILL AND GROUT REINF BAR (EPOXY COATED)EACH 16.00 3.36 53.75
2521.618 CONCRETE CURB RAMP WALK SQ FT 61.00 17.60 1,073.49
2531.618 TRUNCATED DOMES SQ FT 12.00 74.62 895.44
2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 0.11 192,277.81 21,150.56
2565.501 EMERGENCY VEHICLE PREEMPTION SYSTEM B LUMP SUM 0.75 11,166.27 8,374.70
2565.516 TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEM B SYSTEM 0.75 237,858.93 178,394.20
TOTAL 335,730.87
(2)100% ST. LOUIS PARK*54,131.86
100% ST. LOUIS PARK 281,599.01
*6% CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING
Data is considered Non-public prior to project award under the
Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13.- 3 -
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5e)
Title: Resolution authorizing agreement with MnDOT for TH 169 and Cedar Lake Road Project - Ward 4 Page 20
1060462(3) 25% STATE, 75% MINNETONKA FUNDS
ITEM SP 2772-134, SAP 142-155-004 UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COST
NUMBER STATE FURNISHED MATERIALS (3)
ATC CABINET 350 EACH 1.00 58,841.46 58,841.46
GRIDSMART VIDEO DETECTION (INCLUDES 1 CAMERA)EACH 1.00 25,354.12 25,354.12
ADDITIONAL GRIDSMART CAMERA EACH 1.00 6,539.50 6,539.50
PTZ CAMERA EACH 1.00 5,207.36 5,207.36
FIBER EACH 1.00 1,277.28 1,277.28
TOTAL 97,219.72
(3)25% STATE 24,304.93
75% MINNETONKA 72,914.79
(4) 25% STATE, 75% ST. LOUIS PARK FUNDS
ITEM SP 2772-134, SAP 163-010-040 UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COST
NUMBER STATE FURNISHED MATERIALS (4)
ATC CABINET 350 EACH 1.00 58,841.46 58,841.46
GRIDSMART VIDEO DETECTION (INCLUDES 1 CAMERA)EACH 1.00 25,354.12 25,354.12
ADDITIONAL GRIDSMART CAMERA EACH 1.00 6,539.50 6,539.50
PTZ CAMERA EACH 1.00 5,207.36 5,207.36
FIBER EACH 1.00 1,277.28 1,277.28
TOTAL 97,219.72
(4)25% STATE 24,304.93
75% ST. LOUIS PARK 72,914.79
*** LUMP SUM AMOUNT ***
*** LUMP SUM AMOUNT ***
Data is considered Non-public prior to project award under the
Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13.- 4 -
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5e)
Title: Resolution authorizing agreement with MnDOT for TH 169 and Cedar Lake Road Project - Ward 4 Page 21
1060462(5) 81.42% FEDERAL, 18.58% STATE FUNDS (CAPPED), REMAINDER 20.36% FEDERAL, 4.64% STATE, 75% MINNETONKA FUNDS
ITEM SP 2772-134, SAP 142-155-004 UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COST
NUMBER EARLY PROCUREMENT SIGNAL POLE STEEL WORK ITEM (5)
2565.601 FURNISH TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEM A MATERIAL LUMP SUM 1.00 157,613.00
TOTAL 157,613.00
(5)FEDERAL FUNDS 40,325.00
81.42% FEDERAL 32,832.62 CAPPED
18.58% STATE 7,492.39 CAPPED
REMAINDER FEDERAL FUNDS 117,288.00
20.36% FEDERAL 23,879.84
4.64% STATE 5,442.16
75% MINNETONKA 87,966.00
(6) 81.42% FEDERAL, 18.58% STATE FUNDS (CAPPED), REMAINDER 20.36% FEDERAL, 4.64% STATE, 75% ST. LOUIS PARK FUNDS
ITEM SP 2772-134, SAP 163-010-040 UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COST
NUMBER EARLY PROCUREMENT SIGNAL POLE STEEL WORK ITEM (6)
2565.601 FURNISH TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEM B MATERIAL LUMP SUM 1.00 170,024.00
TOTAL 170,024.00
(6)FEDERAL FUNDS 38,934.00
81.42% FEDERAL 31,700.06 CAPPED
18.58% STATE 7,233.94 CAPPED
REMAINDER FEDERAL FUNDS 131,090.00
20.36% FEDERAL 26,689.92
4.64% STATE 6,082.58
75% ST. LOUIS PARK 98,317.50
*** LUMP SUM AMOUNT ***
*** LUMP SUM AMOUNT ***
Data is considered Non-public prior to project award under the
Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13.- 5 -
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5e)
Title: Resolution authorizing agreement with MnDOT for TH 169 and Cedar Lake Road Project - Ward 4 Page 22
1060462(7) 100% MINNETONKA FUNDS
ITEM SP 2772-134, SAP 142-155-004 UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COST
NUMBER SIGNAL PAINTING WORK ITEM (7)
2565.602 PAINT SIGNAL SYSTEM A EACH 1.00 12,337.00
TOTAL 12,337.00
(7)100% MINNETONKA FUNDS 12,337.00
(8) 100% ST. LOUIS PARK FUNDS
ITEM SP 2772-134, SAP 163-010-040 UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COST
NUMBER SIGNAL PAINTING WORK ITEM (8)
2565.602 PAINT SIGNAL SYSTEM B EACH 1.00 13,608.00
TOTAL 13,608.00
(8)100% ST. LOUIS PARK FUNDS 13,608.00
*** LUMP SUM AMOUNT ***
*** LUMP SUM AMOUNT ***
Data is considered Non-public prior to project award under the
Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13.- 6 -
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5e)
Title: Resolution authorizing agreement with MnDOT for TH 169 and Cedar Lake Road Project - Ward 4 Page 23
CITY OF MINNETONKA
RESOLUTION
IT IS RESOLVED that the City of Minnetonka enter into MnDOT Agreement 1060462 with the State of Minnesota,
Department of Transportation for the following purposes:
To provide for payment by the City to the State of the City's share of the costs of the signal construction and other
associated construction to be performed upon, along, and adjacent to Trunk Highway 169 at Cedar Lake Road and
from Cedar Crest Road East to Jordan Avenue South under State Project 2772-134 (TH 169=383).
IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and the
(Title)
are authorized to execute the Agreement and any amendments to the Agreement.
CERTIFICATION
I certify that the above Resolution is an accurate copy of the Resolution adopted by the Council of the City of
Minnetonka at an authorized meeting held on the day of
, 2025, as shown by the minutes of the meeting in my possession.
Subscribed and sworn to me this
day of , 2025
Notary Public
My Commission Expires
(Signature)
(Type or Print Name)
(Title)
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5e)
Title: Resolution authorizing agreement with MnDOT for TH 169 and Cedar Lake Road Project - Ward 4 Page 24
CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK
RESOLUTION
IT IS RESOLVED that the City of St. Louis Park enter into MnDOT Agreement 1060462 with the State of Minnesota,
Department of Transportation for the following purposes:
To provide for payment by the City to the State of the City's share of the costs of the sidewalk, watermain, and signal
construction and other associated construction to be performed upon, along, and adjacent to Trunk Highway 169 at
Cedar Lake Road and from Cedar Crest Road East to Jordan Avenue South under State Project 2772-134
(TH 169=383).
IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and the
(Title)
are authorized to execute the Agreement and any amendments to the Agreement.
CERTIFICATION
I certify that the above Resolution is an accurate copy of the Resolution adopted by the Council of the City of
St. Louis Park at an authorized meeting held on the day of
, 2025, as shown by the minutes of the meeting in my possession.
Subscribed and sworn to me this
day of , 2025
Notary Public
My Commission Expires
(Signature)
(Type or Print Name)
(Title)
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5e)
Title: Resolution authorizing agreement with MnDOT for TH 169 and Cedar Lake Road Project - Ward 4 Page 25
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: February 17, 2026
Consent agenda item: 5f
Executive summary
Title: Resolution authorizing participation in Hennepin County Auto Theft Task Force
Recommended action: Motion to adopt a resolution approving St. Louis Park police
department participation in Hennepin County Auto Theft Task Force.
Policy consideration: Does the city council wish to authorize the St. Louis Park police
department's participation in the Hennepin County Auto Theft Task Force?
Summary: Beginning on July 1, 2026, the Hennepin County Sheriff’s Office (HCSO) will begin
oversight of an interagency collaborative unit, the Hennepin County Auto Theft Task Force
(HCATTF), whose mission will be to prevent, investigate and assist in the prosecution of crimes
related to and adjacent to auto theft.
The HCATTF will be comprised of local law enforcement agencies from Hennepin County and
the HCSO. Membership of the unit includes funding of $100,000 annually beginning in July 2026
to offset the salary and benefits of one current investigator and $3,000 annually for related
training for each participating officer. The HCATTF provides the City of St. Louis Park and its
police department with a unique opportunity to partner with the other Hennepin County law
enforcement agencies and the HCSO. The partnership will provide benefits of collaboration,
knowledge transfer and information exchange in areas such as technology and training, all of
which serve to be a force multiplier to our organization. This opportunity will underwrite part of
the cost of an existing officer for two years, with the possibility of extension.
Financial or budget considerations: The city will receive up to an additional $50,000 in 2026
and $50,000 in 2027 by participating in HCATTF. One current employee will work on tasks
related to the HCATTF and will not require additional spending over what is budgeted in 2026
for overtime or personnel costs.
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a variety of options for
people to make their way around the city comfortably, safely and reliably.
Supporting documents: Resolution
Hennepin County Auto Theft Collaboration Cooperative Agreement
Prepared by: Dennis Hagen, lieutenant
Reviewed by: Bryan Kruelle, police chief
Amelia Cruver, finance director
Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5f) Page 2
Title: Resolution authorizing participation in Hennepin County Auto Theft Task Force
Discussion
The Hennepin County Auto Theft Task Force (HCATTF) is the first-of-its-kind in the state of
Minnesota and will include the Cities of St. Louis Park, Minnetonka, Edina and the HCSO.
Participation provides us with collaboration, knowledge transfer and information exchange in
areas such as technology and training. Participating cities will also receive funds to support the
work. The HCATTF is funded for two years with the possibility of extension.
Due to needs within St. Louis Park around auto theft, we already have an investigator assigned
to the work and this position can be leveraged to participate in the HCATTF. In 2024, 51% of this
investigator’s daily work was directly related to auto theft and the adjacent crimes associated.
Between Jan. 1 and June 30, 2025, 77% of their daily work was directly related to auto theft and
the adjacent crimes associated. Our officer will continue to be housed out of the St. Louis Park
Police Department and respond as needed to accomplish the mission of the task force. Since
the funds the city receives from HCATTF participation will not fully cover the costs of the
existing position, the expectation is that the investigator will continue to be accountable to the
needs of our agency while working collaboratively with other task force members.
To achieve the mission to prevent, investigate, and assist in the prosecution of crimes related to
and adjacent to auto theft, the HCATTF will gather information necessary to identify crime
patterns and develop strategies for the prevention and enforcement of crimes of auto theft,
carjacking (robbery) and the adjacent criminalities to include retail crimes and vehicle chopping.
An important component of this work will include conducting outreach and education with the
community to facilitate the creation and implementation of solutions that help to deter and
prevent auto theft – an approach that proactively seeks to safeguard all communities.
Like the work and mission of the other task forces that the St Louis Park police department
participates in, the work simultaneously benefits our city, the broader metro community and
the state. As our community policing model recognizes, the nature of policing requires a
collaborative approach to uplift public safety in general. In addition, the nature of auto theft
and the subsequent crimes committed with the stolen vehicle often involve violent crime. This
relationship will afford access to the Hennepin County Violent Offenders Task Force, which will
provide aid in the adjacent crimes to include robbery, violent assaults, carjacking, violent drug
crimes and human trafficking.
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5f) Page 3
Title: Resolution authorizing participation in Hennepin County Auto Theft Task Force
Resolution No. 26 - ___
Approving St. Louis Park Police Department’s participation
in the Hennepin County Auto Theft Task Force
Whereas, the City of St. Louis Park on behalf of its police department desires to enter
into a cooperative agreement with the Hennepin County Sherriff’s Office (HCSO). The resolution
approving a cooperative agreement with the HCSO would assign one sworn police officer from
the St. Louis Park police department to the HCSO’s Auto Theft Task Force, with funding for the
position provided by the HCSO in the amount of $100,000 dollars for salary, and $3,000 dollars
for training annually,
Now therefore be it resolved by the city council of St. Louis Park as follows:
1. That the city of St. Louis Park on behalf of its police department approves the updated
HCSO cooperative agreement.
2. Nadia Mohamed, the mayor for the city of St. Louis Park, and Kim Keller, the city
manager, or successors, are hereby authorized to execute such agreements and amendments
as are necessary to join membership with the Hennepin County Auto Theft Task Force, on
behalf of the city of St. Louis Park.
Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council February 17, 2026:
Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5f) Page 4
Title: Resolution authorizing participation in Hennepin County Auto Theft Task Force
HENNEPIN COUNTY AUTO THEFT COLLABORATION COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
This Agreement is between the COUNTY OF HENNEPIN, STATE OF MINNESOTA ("COUNTY"), on behalf of the Hennepin
County Sheriff's Office (the "Sheriff's Office") and the City of Minnetonka, on behalf of the Minnetonka Police Department, the
City of St. Louis Park, on behalf of the St. Louis Park Police Department, and the City of Edina, on behalf of the Edina
Police Department.
PURPOSE
The purpose of the Hennepin County Auto Theft Collaboration Agreement ("Agreement") is to set forth the guidelines under
which the Sheriff's Office and the below referenced Law Enforcement Agencies (the "Agencies") will operate when working
collaboratively as the Multi- Jurisdictional Collaborative Unit. The intent of this agreement is to coordinate and maximize
cooperation between the Agencies, the communities they represent, and the Hennepin County Sheriff’s Office.
MISSION
The mission of the Hennepin County Auto Theft Collaboration (“Collaboration”) is to respond in real time to active vehicle
thefts including vehicle tampers, car jackings and other vehicle related crimes. The Hennepin County Auto Theft
Collaboration will take a proactive, intelligence-based approach to responding to vehicle thefts and other felonies associated
with vehicle thefts in Hennepin County. This approach includes a proactive response to city and county needs through the
utilization of multiple analysts and analytical data. Leveraging these resources will enable the Collaboration to identify and
focus on specific suspects actively engaged in such crimes through surveillance, GPS tracking, phone pings, and other
lawful investigative techniques.
The undersigned governmental units, in the co-operative and mutual exercise of their powers, agree as follows:
1) ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
A) Organizational Control. Responsibility for the overall policy and direction of the Hennepin County Auto Theft
Collaboration shall rest with. the Hennepin County Sheriff's Office. The Sheriff of Hennepin County has directed the
Captain/Lieutenant of the Sheriff's Major Crimes Division to coordinate the policies, procedures and the activities of this
Collaboration. The Sheriff’s Office agrees to write and submit the Dedicated Auto Theft Grant to include ONE FULL-
TIME (Full Funded) Detective from the Cities of Minnetonka, St. Louis Park, and Edina. Along with additional fully
funded positions within the Sheriff’s Office. In return, each Members Chief or designee will provide a letter of
commitment from their prospective city committing to collaboration within the Hennepin County Auto Theft
Collaboration.
B) Supervision. The overall supervision of the Hennepin County Auto Theft Collaboration shall be the responsibility of the
Lieutenant of the Hennepin County Sheriff's Major Crimes Special Assignments Unit. The chain of command will be
as follows: Sheriff’s Office Sergeant, Sheri ff’ s Office Lieutena nt, and Sherif f’s
Office C aptain . The Collaboration will have a command element to oversee the grant writing, operations,
planning and training of the Hennepin County Auto Theft Collaboration. The Sheriff's Office command element will
be responsible for incident decision making and on scene management per Sheriff’s Office policies and procedures.
C) Members. Initially, and subject to Section VIII (below), the Collaboration is comprised of members from the following
Agencies (collectively, the "Members" or "Member Agencies"):
i. Hennepin County Sheriff's Office
ii. Minnetonka Police Department
iii. St. Louis Park Police Department
iv. Edina Police Department.
2) TEAM MEMBERSHIP/MOBILIZATION
Each Member shall put forth a pre-agreed upon number of sworn peace officers(s) to participate on the Hennepin
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5f) Page 5
Title: Resolution authorizing participation in Hennepin County Auto Theft Task Force
County Auto Theft Collaboration (the "Member Officers"). These members, being grant funded under the Dedicated
Auto Theft Grant, will be mobilized via text/phone call during active incidents involving auto theft or a related crime.
In the event of an emergency requiring the services of the Collaboration, the Sheriff's Office or its designee will
authorize a callout for Member Officers using the above-mentioned text group/phone call. Any team member can
activate the Collaboration and direct the Member Officers to report to active incidents. Members should instruct their
Member Officers to respond quickly while either off duty or on duty. Member Officers shall notify their respective
Agencies of Hennepin County Auto Theft Collaboration activation/mobilization. Member Officers shall be responsible
for notifying their respective Agency of their involvement in a Hennepin County Auto Theft Collaboration activity.
3) PHYSICAL LOCATION
The Hennepin County Auto Theft Collaboration will NOT be co-located. Each Member Officers will be housed in
their current location with their respective city/home agency unless a proactive or emergency event occurs where
they need to assist other members of the Collaboration. Unless the parties otherwise agree, Collaboration vehicles
and equipment owned by the Sheriff's Office shall be housed at PSF garage in Minneapolis and all vehicles and
equipment owned and contributed by the Agencies shall be housed at each Agency's place of business. The
Sheriff's Office shall issue Member Officers electronic access cards to allow for limited entry into the Division
headquarters.
4) TEAM EQUIPMENT
The cost of equipment, training, operations and resources for each Member Agency officer assigned to the
Hennepin County Auto Theft Collaboration shall be the responsibility of that officer's Agency. The Sheriff's Office
may use federal grants to purchase necessary equipment for the Collaboration and its Members to safely execute its
mission. All equipment purchased using grant funds for the exclusive use of the Collaboration remains the property
of the Sheriff's Office. Members shall be responsible for all the equipment issued to them and shall report any lost
or damaged equipment to the Collaboration supervisors as soon as possible. Upon withdrawal from the
Collaboration, or termination of this Agreement, Members shall promptly return all issued equipment owned by the
Sheriff's Office to the Sherriff's Office in good working condition.
5) SALARIES AND COMPENSATION/SEIZURES
Each Member shall pay the salaries of its own officers, including any overtime. The Sheriff's Office may, in its sole
discretion, elect to use existing grants or apply for Federal or State grants to pay for overtime or backfill costs for
Member Officers to attend training or respond to incidents. The Sheriff’s Office, with the cooperation of the other
Members, will apply for agreed upon State of Minnesota grants. Upon award of any State of Minnesota grant, the
Members will review the grant terms and then-applicable law. The parties must unanimously agree to accept the
grant.
If the parties do not unanimously agree to accept the grant, the Members may: 1) permit any Member that do not
accept the grant to immediately withdraw and cancel its participation in the Collaboration; 2) immediately terminate
the Collaboration and this Agreement in entirety; or 3) such other resolution as a majority of Members agree upon.
If the parties unanimously agree to accept the grant, the Sheriff’s Office will exercise reasonable efforts to act as
the fiduciary responsible for administration and management of the grant , which may include performing the
following:
• Administer financial and administrative grant requirements
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5f) Page 6
Title: Resolution authorizing participation in Hennepin County Auto Theft Task Force
• Subject to applicable law, submit financial, programmatic and similar reports required under the grant
• Work with the grantor regarding administrative issues
• Comply with grant conditions regarding financial administration of the grant including but not limited to,
in accordance with applicable law, reporting, data collection and evaluation requirements prescribe d
by the grant
• Coordinate compliance with audit requirements attached to the grant
• Manage grant funds
• Pursuant to applicable accounting standards and procedures, maintain financial and accounting books
and records as shall be necessary, appropriate and convenient for the proper administration of the
grant.
.
Each member agency will receive an equal share of the actual amount of the accepted grant, which may include
an initial up-front payment and fiscal year distributions for training or other grant specified purposes. The above-
mentioned funding sources and amounts are pending full grant awards and could be subject to change due to
potential changes in future grant awards.
Any assets, money, or property seized as a result of the Hennepin County Au to Theft Collaboration's work will
remain with the agency that originated the case. The originating agency will be responsible for all related forms,
distributions, and claims.
6) LIABILITY
A) Liability for Acts. Except as otherwise provided herein, each Member shall be responsible for its own acts
and the acts of its officers and employees and any liability resulting therefrom to the extent authorized by
law and no Member shall be responsible for the acts of any other Member or any liability resulting therefrom.
Each Member acknowledges and agrees that it is insured or self-insured consistent with the limits established
in Minnesota state statute. Each Member agrees to promptly notify all other Members if it becomes aware
of any potential Hennepin County Auto Theft Collaboration related claims or facts that have or could give rise
to such claims.
B) Liability for Injuries or Death. Each Member shall be responsible for injuries to or death of its own personnel.
Each Member shall maintain workers' compensation insurance or self-insurance coverage, covering its own
personnel while they are assigned to the Hennepin County Auto Theft Collaboration or are otherwise
participating in or assisting with Collaboration operations or activities. Each Member waives the right to, and
agrees that it will not, bring any claim or suit against the Collaboration or any other Member for any workers'
compensation benefits paid to its own employees, or their dependents, that arise out of participation in or
assistance with Collaboration operations or activities, even if the injuries were caused wholly or partially by the
negligence of any other Member or its officers, employees, or volunteers.
C) Liability for Damage to Equipment. Each Member shall be responsible for damages to or loss of its own
equipment. Each Member waives the right to, and agrees that it will not, bring any claim or suit against the
D) Hennepin County Auto Theft Collaboration or any other Member for damages to or loss of its equipment arising
out of participation in or assistance with Collaboration operations or activities, even if the damages or losses
were caused wholly or partially by the negligence of any other Members or its officers, employees, or
volunteers.
E) Limitation of Liability. As applicable, under no circumstances shall a party be required to pay any amount in
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5f) Page 7
Title: Resolution authorizing participation in Hennepin County Auto Theft Task Force
excess of the limits on liability established in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466 applicable to any one party.
The statutory limits of liability for some or all of the parties may not be added together or stacked to increase
the maximum amount of liability for any party.
7) TERM
The term of this Agreement shall be for 3 years, commencing on July 1st, 2027, and terminating on July 1, 2029,
unless terminated earlier pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. This Agreement may be extended by mutual
written agreement of all the Members for one successive 3-year term upon the same terms, conditions, and
covenants, unless the Collaboration is dissolved prior to expiration of the initial or successive term.
8) ADDITIONAL MEMBERS AND CHANGE IN MEMBERSHIP
A governmental unit may join the Hennepin County Auto Theft Collaboration and become a Member upon approval
by the Hennepin County Sheriff’s Office , Member Cities and execution of this Agreement. The parties
acknowledge and agree that the Hennepin County Sheriff, or his/her designee, is authorized on behalf of COUNTY
to approve/deny potential new governmental units and to terminate existing Members pursuant to the foregoing.
A Member may, upon 60 days' written notice to the Hennepin County Sheriff’s Office, withdraw and cancel its
participation in the Collaboration with or without cause.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned governmental units caused this Agreement to be executed.
Remainder of page intentionally left blank
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5f) Page 8
Title: Resolution authorizing participation in Hennepin County Auto Theft Task Force
COUNTY BOARD AUTHORIZATION
Reviewed for COUNTY by
the County Attorney's Office:
{{Sig_es_:signer3:signature}}
{{userstamp3_es_:signer3:stamp}}
Reviewed for COUNTY by:
{{Sig_es_:signer4:signature}}
{{userstamp4_es_:signer4:stamp}}
Board Resolution No:
{{*BoardResolution_es_:signer4:brs}}
Document Assembled by:
{{Sig_es_:signer1:signature}}
{{userstamp1_es_:signer1:stamp}}
{{Exh_es_:signer1:attachment:label("Attachments")}}
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
STATE OF MINNESOTA
By:
{{Sig_es_:signer6:signature}}
{{userstamp6_es_:signer6:stamp}}
ATTEST:
{{Sig_es_:signer7:signature}}
{{userstamp7_es_:signer7:stamp}}
By:
{{Sig_es_:signer5:signature}}
{{userstamp5_es_:signer5:stamp}}
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5f) Page 9
Title: Resolution authorizing participation in Hennepin County Auto Theft Task Force
City of Edina
By: _______________________________
Name
Its: City Mayor
Date: ______________________________
By: _______________________________
Name
Its: City Manager
Date: ______________________________
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5f) Page 10
Title: Resolution authorizing participation in Hennepin County Auto Theft Task Force
City of St. Louis Park
By: _______________________________
Name
Its: City Mayor
Date: ______________________________
By: _______________________________
Name
Its: City Manager
Date: ______________________________
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5f) Page 11
Title: Resolution authorizing participation in Hennepin County Auto Theft Task Force
City of Minnetonka
By: _______________________________
Name
Its: City Mayor
Date: ______________________________
By: _______________________________
Name
Its: City Manager
Date: ______________________________
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: February 17, 2026
Consent agenda item: 5g
Executive summary
Title: Approve replacement of Vactor sewer cleaner with freightliner chassis (unit 1629)
Recommended action: Recommend approve replacement of unit 1629, Vactor sewer cleaner
with freightliner chassis.
Policy consideration: Does the city council approve replacing the Vactor sewer cleaner with
freightliner chassis (unit 1629)?
Summary: The city’s 2016 Vactor sewer cleaner is 10 years old and scheduled to be replaced in
the 2026 capital improvement plan. This vehicle performs maintenance duties including
proactive maintenance, emergency response and cleaning of underground infrastructure,
including sanitary sewers, storm drains and catch basins. These trucks use high-pressure water
jetting to break up debris, grease and roots, while a powerful vacuum removes it to prevent
blockages, flooding and environmental hazards. Staff has reviewed the replacement and based
on age, condition and salvage value, recommend this vehicle should be replaced now as
planned in the CIP. The replacement will be similar in type and use as our current vehicle. In
current market conditions, receipt of the unit is expected in 18-24 months from date of order.
A quote for a Vactor sewer cleaner with freightliner chassis was received in the amount of
$657,797.48, $120,000 trade in value for the 2016 Vactor, the total replacement cost would be
$537,797.48. The replacement will be purchased via the State of Minnesota cooperative
purchasing venture with MacQueen Equipment.
The city council’s approval is required because the purchase is over the statutory limit of
$175,000.
Financial or budget considerations: The replaced unit will be traded in for $120,000, and
proceeds will be deducted from replacement cost. The budgeted cost of the new Vactor with
freightliner chassis was $800,000.00 and the estimated replacement cost is $657,797.48.
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to continue to lead in
environmental stewardship.
Supporting documents: None.
Prepared by: Tom O’Donnell, fleet manager
Reviewed by: Stacy M. Voelker, administrative coordinator
Jason T. West, parks and recreation director
Amelia Cruver, finance director
Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: February 17, 2026
Action agenda item: 7a
Executive summary
Title: First reading of ordinance amending city code chapter 2 related to boards and
commissions
Recommended action: Motion to approve the first reading of an ordinance amending various
sections of chapter 2 of the city code related to boards and commissions and to set the second
reading for March 2, 2026.
Policy consideration: Does the city council wish to proceed with the ordinance amendments
proposed to the city code chapter 2 regarding boards and commissions?
Summary: Throughout 2025, several amendments to chapter 2 of the St. Louis Park City Code
were brought forward for city council consideration. This prompted staff to conduct a
comprehensive review of the chapter to ensure consistent language and alignment across all
sections. While most updates are grammatical or structural in nature and intended to improve
readability or provide clarity, a few notable changes include:
•Removal of purpose sections for the Human Rights Commission and the Environment
and Sustainability Commission. These two commissions were the only ones with
standalone purpose statements, and their powers and duties already sufficiently
describe their purpose. Removing these sections creates consistency across all
commissions.
•Removal of “qualified voter” as a requirement for service on boards and commissions.
This language created an inequitable barrier for residents who are active community
members but not eligible voters. Eliminating this requirement ensures broader and
more inclusive access to civic participation.
Financial or budget considerations: None
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to creating opportunities to build
social capital through community engagement.
Supporting documents: Proposed ordinance
Prepared by: Pat Coleman, community engagement coordinator
Reviewed by: Cheyenne Brodeen, administrative services director
Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 7a) Page 2
Title: First reading of ordinance amending city code chapter 2 related to boards and commissions
Ordinance No.________ - 26
Amending St. Louis Park City Code Chapter 2, Article IV to ensure consistent and
standardized language related to boards and commissions
The City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota does ordain:
Section 1. St. Louis Park City Code Chapter 2, Article IV, is hereby amended as follows to delete
the struck-out language and to add the underlined text:
Article IV. Boards, Commissions and Committees
Division 1. Generally
Secs. 2-161--2-180. Reserved.
Division 2. Community Technology Advisory Commission
Sec. 2-181. Membership; terms.
(a) Advisory function; composition. The community technology advisory commission shall be an
advisory commission to the city council. It shall consist of seven (7) regular members and two
(2) youth members and one ex-officio member, all appointed as set forth in this section.
(b) Regular members. All regular members of the commission shall be appointed by the city
council to three-year terms. The terms of regular members shall run until May 31 of the year in
which their terms expire and until a qualified successor is appointed. In the event of a vacancy,
the city council shall may appoint a person to complete the unexpired term. Subsequent
appointments shall be for three-year terms. A member of the commission may be removed
with or without cause by the city council.
(c) Youth members. Youth members shall be appointed by the city council to one-year terms.
Youth members shall have the same voting powers as regular members.
(d) Ex-officio member. One ex-officio member shall be appointed by the cable company which
is granted a franchise by the city. The ex-officio member shall not vote or be counted as part of
the quorum, but shall be present at all meetings.
(d) (e) Qualifications. All Regular members of the commission shall be qualified voters and
residents of the city. Youth members shall be high school students. A vacancy shall be deemed
to exist if a member ceases to meet the residency requirements qualifications set forth in this
section. Youth members shall be high school students of a private or public school located in
the city. All members will be appointed through the application and appointment process
established by the city council.
(e) (f) Term limits. Regular members may serve up to two, three-year consecutive terms on any
board or commission. Members must sit out one full term before re-applying to the community
technology advisory commission.
(Code 1976, § 1-320; Ord. No. 2572-19, 10-7-19; Ord. No. 2603-21, 1-19-21; Ord. No. 2689-25,
3-325; Ord. No. 2695-25, 7-21-25)
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 7a) Page 3
Title: First reading of ordinance amending city code chapter 2 related to boards and commissions
Sec. 2-182. Organization.
(a) A staff liaison to the community technology advisory commission shall be appointed by the
city manager and shall be subject to the administrative rules and regulations of the city.
(b) The commission shall elect its own chair and vice-chair. Subject to such limitations as may
be imposed by the city council at any time. The community technology advisory commission
shall provide its own rules and procedures, determine the date and time of meetings, and,
upon proper notice, it shall call public hearings when necessary and desirable and in accordance
with all requirements of local, state, and federal laws. The bylaws of the commission and any
amendments of such bylaws shall be submitted to the city council upon their adoption. Such
bylaws and any amendments shall be deemed to be approved by the city council unless the city
council takes action to modify such bylaws or amendments within 30 days after submission. No
member of the commission shall consider or vote upon any question in which the member is
directly or indirectly interested.
(c) The community technology advisory commission shall keep proper records of its
proceedings. Such records shall be maintained by the staff liaison or the liaison's designee.
(Code 1976, § 1-321; Ord. No. 2572-19, 10-7-19)
Sec. 2-183. Stipends and expenses of members.
(a) Stipends. Each of the regular and youth members of the community technology
advisory commission shall receive a stipend of $49/per month.
(b) Expenses of members. The members of the community technology advisory
commission may be reimbursed for actual expenses to the extent that funds therefore are
provided in the annual city budget adopted by the city council. The commission shall properly
account for its receipts and expenditures of monies in accordance with established city
procedures.
(Code 1976, § 1-322; Ord. No. 2572-19, 10-7-19; Ord. No. 2689-25, 3-3-25; Ord. No. 2695-25, 7-
2125)
Sec. 2-184. Powers and duties.
The community technology advisory commission shall have the following powers and duties to:
(1) (a) Advise and collaborate with the city council and boards and commissions on the
application and use of technology for the purpose of improving city services and quality of life
for St. Louis Park’s citizens, businesses and visitors; and
(2) (b) Submit to the city council an annual report of the activities of the commission during the
previous year; and
(3) (c) Perform other functions as needed to carry out these duties and responsibilities as
directed by the city council and to act in an advisory capacity to the city council.
(Code 1976, § 1-323; Ord. No. 2572-19, 10-7-19, Ord. 2603-21, 1-19-21; Ord. No. 2689-25, 3-3-
25; Ord. No. 2695-25, 7-21-25)
Secs. 2-185--2-210. Reserved.
Division 3. Human Rights Commission
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 7a) Page 4
Title: First reading of ordinance amending city code chapter 2 related to boards and commissions
Sec. 2-211. Purpose.
The purpose of the human rights commission shall be to advise the city council in its
efforts to ensure all citizens protection of their human rights and full and equal opportunity for
participation in the affairs of this community. The city declares, as a matter of public policy, that
it is interested in securing for all of its citizens equal opportunity in housing, employment, public
services, public accommodations and education, and that it is the public policy of the city to assist
the state department of human rights in implementing the Minnesota Human Rights Act (M.S.A.
§ 363.13) by the human rights commission's investigation of complaints, development and
implementation of a program of education and compliance review, and through advising the city
council on long range programs to improve human relations and expand the protection of human
rights in the city.
(Code 1976, § 1-340)
Sec. 2-212 211. Membership; terms.
(a) Advisory function; composition. The human rights commission shall be an advisory
commission to the city council. It shall consist of eight (8) regular members and two (2) youth
members all appointed as set forth in this section.
(b) Regular members. All regular members of the commission, at least one of whom shall be an
attorney, shall be appointed by the city council to three-year terms. The terms of regular
members shall run until May 31 of the year in which their terms expire and until a qualified
successor is appointed. In the event of a vacancy, the city council shall may appoint a person to
complete the unexpired term. Subsequent appointments shall be for three-year terms. A
member of the commission may be removed with or without cause by the city council.
(c) Youth members. Youth members shall be appointed by the city council to one-year terms.
Youth members shall have the same voting power as regular members.
(d) Qualifications. All regular members of the commission shall be qualified voters and
residents of the city. Youth members shall be high school students. A vacancy shall be deemed
to exist if a member ceases to meet the residency requirements qualifications set forth in this
section. Youth members shall be high school students of a private or public school located in
the city. All members will be appointed through the application and appointment process
established by the city council.
(e) Term limits. Regular members may serve up to two, three-year consecutive terms on any
board or commission. Members must sit out one full term before re-applying to the human
rights commission.
(Code 1976, § 1-341; Ord. No. 2403-11, 9-30-2011; Ord. 2603-21, 1-19-21; Ord. No. 2689-25, 3-
325; Ord. No. 2695-25, 7-21-25)
Sec. 2-213 212. Organization.
(a) A staff liaison to the human rights commission shall be appointed by the city manager. The
liaison shall be subject to the administrative rules and regulations of the city.
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 7a) Page 5
Title: First reading of ordinance amending city code chapter 2 related to boards and commissions
(b) The commission shall elect its own chair and vice-chair. Subject to the limitations as may be
imposed by the city council at any time, the commission shall provide its own rules and
procedure, shall determine the date and time of its meetings, and, upon proper notice, shall call
public hearings when necessary or desirable and in accordance with all requirements of local
and state laws. The bylaws of the commission and any amendments of such bylaws shall be
submitted to the city council upon their adoption. Such bylaws and any amendments shall be
deemed to be approved by the city council unless the city council takes action to modify such
bylaws or amendments within 30 days after submission. No member of the commission shall
consider or vote upon any question in which the member is directly or indirectly interested.
(c) The human rights commission shall keep proper records of its proceedings, and such
records shall be maintained by the staff liaison or the liaison's designee.
(Code 1976, § 1-342)
Sec. 2-214 213. Stipends and expenses of members.
(a) Stipends. Each of the regular and youth members of the human rights commission
shall receive a stipend of $49/per month.
(b) Expenses of members. The members of the human rights commission may be
reimbursed for actual expenses to the extent that funds therefore are provided in the annual
city budget adopted by the city council. The commission shall properly account for its receipts
and expenditures of monies in accordance with established city procedures.
(Code 1976, § 1-343; Ord. No. 2689-25, 3-3-25; Ord. No. 2695-25, 7-21-25)
Sec. 2-215 214. Powers and duties.
The human rights commission shall have the following powers and duties to:
(1) (a) Study and review programs and policies and advise and aid the city council in enlisting
the cooperation of agencies, organizations, and individuals in the city in an active program
directed to create equal opportunity and eliminate discrimination.
(2) Advise and aid the city council in developing and implementing programs of cooperation
with the state department of human rights to fulfill the purposes set out in section 2-211.
(3) (b) Make recommendations to the city council regarding formulation and implementation
of human rights programs for the city. The programs shall be directed toward increasing the
effectiveness and direction of all individuals and agencies of the city through planning,
policymaking and education in the area of human rights.
(4) (c) Advise the city council with respect to human rights issues arising out of or in
connection with the plans or operations of any city department or agency and recommend the
adoption of such specific policies or actions as may be needed to protect human rights in the
city.
(5) (d) Advise and recommend to the city council programs or legislation to eliminate
inequalities of opportunity in the area of human rights.
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 7a) Page 6
Title: First reading of ordinance amending city code chapter 2 related to boards and commissions
(6) (e) Publish and distribute to the public at large any materials necessary or advisable to carry
out its functions, subject to requirements of the city council.
(7) (f) Make studies, surveys, and investigations necessary or advisable to carry out its
functions.
(8) (g) Sponsor such meetings, institutes, forums and other educational activities as will lead to
clearer understanding of local human rights issues and contribute to their proper resolution.
(9) (h) Submit to the city council an annual report of the activities of the commission during the
previous year.
(b) (i) Perform other functions as needed to carry out these duties and responsibilities as
directed by the city council and to act in an advisory capacity to the city council.The commission
shall have such additional powers and duties as the city council shall from time to time
determine.
(Code 1976, § 1-344; Ord. No. 2689-25, 3-3-25; Ord. No. 2695-25, 7-21-25)
Secs. 2-216 215--2-240. Reserved.
Division 4. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission
Sec. 2-241. Membership; terms.
(a) Advisory function; composition. The parks and recreation advisory commission shall be an
advisory commission to the city council. It shall consist of seven (7) regular members and two
(2) youth members, all appointed as set forth in this section.
(b) Regular members. All regular members of the commission shall be appointed by the city
council to three-year terms. The terms of regular members shall run until May 31 of the year in
which their terms expire and until a qualified successor is duly appointed. In the event of a
vacancy, the city council shall may appoint a person to complete the unexpired term.
Subsequent appointments shall be for three-year terms. A member of the commission may be
removed with or without cause by the city council.
(c) Youth members. Youth members shall be appointed by the city council to one-year terms.
Youth members shall have the same voting power as regular members.
(d) Qualifications. Regular members of the commission shall be qualified voters and residents
of the city. Youth members shall be high school students. A vacancy shall be deemed to exist if
a member ceases to meet the residency requirements qualifications set forth in this section.
Youth members shall be high school students of a private or public school located in the city. All
members will be appointed through the application and appointment process established by
the city council.
(e) Term limits. Regular members may serve up to two, three-year consecutive terms on any
board or commission. Members must sit out one full term before re-applying to the parks and
recreation advisory commission.
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 7a) Page 7
Title: First reading of ordinance amending city code chapter 2 related to boards and commissions
(Code 1976, § 1-310; Ord. 2603-21, 1-19-21; Ord. No. 2689-25, 3-3-25; Ord. No. 2695-25, 7-21-
25)
Sec. 2-242. Organization.
(a) A staff liaison to the parks and recreation advisory commission shall be appointed by the
city manager and shall be subject to the administrative rules and regulations of the city.
(b) The commission shall elect its own chair and vice-chair. Subject to such limitations as may
be imposed by the city council at any time, the commission shall provide its own rules and
procedure, determine the date and time of meetings and, upon proper notice, shall call public
hearings when necessary and desirable and in accordance with all requirements of local and state
laws. The bylaws of the commission and amendments shall be submitted to the city council upon
their adoption. Such bylaws and any amendments shall be deemed to be approved by the city
council unless the city council takes action to modify such bylaws or amendments within 30 days
after submission. No member of the commission shall consider or vote upon any question in
which the member is directly or indirectly interested.
(c) The commission shall keep proper records of its proceedings, and such records shall be
maintained by the staff liaison or the liaison's designee.
(Code 1976, § 1-311)
Sec. 2-243. Stipends and expense of members.
(a) Stipends. Each of the regular and youth members of the parks and recreation
commission shall receive a stipend of $49/per month.
(b) Expenses of members. The members of the parks and recreation advisory commission
may be reimbursed for actual expenses to the extent that funds therefore are provided in the
annual city budget adopted by the city council. The commission shall properly account for its
receipts and expenditures of monies in accordance with established city procedures.
(Code 1976, § 1-312; Ord. No. 2689-25, 3-3-25; Ord. No. 2695-25, 7-21-25)
Sec. 2-244. Powers and duties.
The parks and recreation advisory commission shall have the following powers and duties to:
(1) (a) Consider matters pertaining to public recreation programs in the city.
(2) (b) Evaluate the city's current parks and recreation programs and desires of citizens for such
services.
(3) (c) Keep acquainted with the current state, regional and national parks and recreation
standards for communities.
(4) (d) Recommend programs and a budget of programs and expenditures for operations of the
parks and recreation department.
(5) (e) Study and recommend long range parks and recreation plans for the city.
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 7a) Page 8
Title: First reading of ordinance amending city code chapter 2 related to boards and commissions
(6) (f) Submit to the city council an annual report of the activities of the commission during the
previous year.
(7) (g) Act in an advisory capacity to the city council in all matters which are requested by the
city council. Perform other functions as needed to carry out these duties and
responsibilities as directed by the city council and to act in an advisory capacity to the city
council.
Secs. 2-245--2-270. Reserved.
Division 5. Planning Commission
Sec. 2-271. Membership; terms.
(a) Advisory function; composition. The planning commission shall be an advisory commission
to the city council. It shall consist of seven (7) regular members and one (1) youth member, all
appointed as set forth in this section.
(b) Regular members. All regular members of the commission shall be appointed by the city
council to three-year terms. The terms of regular members shall run until May 31 of the year in
which their terms expire and until a qualified successor is duly appointed. In the event of a
vacancy, the city council shall may appoint a person to complete the unexpired term.
Subsequent appointments shall be for three-year terms. A member of the commission may be
removed with or without cause by the city council.
(c) Youth member. A youth member shall be appointed by the city council to a one-year term.
The youth member shall not have voting power.
(d) Qualifications. Regular members of the commission shall be qualified voters and residents
of the city. The youth member shall be a high school student. A vacancy shall be deemed to
exist if a member ceases to meet the residency requirements qualifications set forth in this
section. The youth member shall be a high school student of a private or public school located
in the city. All members will be appointed through the application and appointment process
established by the city council.
(e) Term limits. Regular members may serve up to two, three-year consecutive terms on any
board or commission. Members must sit out one full term before re-applying to the planning
commission.
(Code 1976, § 1-301; Ord. No. 2689-25, 3-3-25; Ord. No. 2695-25, 7-21-25)
Sec. 2-272. Organization.
(a) A staff liaison to the planning commission shall be appointed by the city manager and shall
be subject to the administrative rules and regulations of the city.
(b) The commission shall elect its own chair, vice-chair and secretary. Subject to such
limitations as may be imposed by the city council at any time, the commission shall provide its
own rules and procedure. The date and time of meetings, and, upon proper notice, shall call
public hearings when necessary and desirable and in accordance with all requirements of local
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 7a) Page 9
Title: First reading of ordinance amending city code chapter 2 related to boards and commissions
and state laws. The bylaws of the commission and any amendments shall be submitted to the
city council upon their adoption. Such bylaws and any amendments shall be deemed to be
approved by the city council unless the city council takes action to modify such bylaws or
amendments within 30 days after submission. No member of the commission shall consider or
vote on any question in which the member is directly or indirectly interested.
(c) The planning commission shall keep proper records of its proceedings, and such records
shall be maintained by the staff liaison or the liaison's designee.
(Code 1976, § 1-302)
Sec. 2-273. Stipends and expenses of members.
(a) Stipends. Each of the regular and youth members of the planning commission shall
receive a stipend of $49/per month.
(b) Expenses of members. The members of the planning commission may be reimbursed for
actual expenses to the extent that funds therefore are provided in the annual city budget
adopted by the city council. The commission shall properly account for its receipts and
expenditures of monies in accordance with established city procedures.
(Code 1976, § 1-303; Ord. No. 2689-25, 3-3-25; Ord. No. 2695-25, 7-21-25)
Sec. 2-274. Powers and duties.
The planning commission shall have the following powers and duties to:
(1) (a) Prepare a comprehensive plan for the future development of the city to be submitted to
the city council for implementation and to maintain such plan and recommend its amendment
to the city council as may become necessary.
(2) (b) Initiate, direct and review, from time to time, a study of the provisions of the zoning
chapter and the subdivision regulations and to report to the city council its advice and
recommendations accordingly.
(3) (c) Study applications and proposals for amendments to the zoning chapter and
applications for special permits and to advise the city council of its recommendations.
(4) (d) Study preliminary and final plats and to advise the city council of its recommendations.
(5) (e) Submit to the city council an annual report of the activities of the commission during the
previous year.
(6) (f) Act in an advisory capacity to the city council in all matters wherein powers are assigned
to the city council by state law or city charter concerning land use, comprehensive planning,
zoning, platting, changes in streets and other matters of a general planning nature.
(Code 1976, § 1-304)
Secs. 2-275--2-300. Reserved.
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 7a) Page 10
Title: First reading of ordinance amending city code chapter 2 related to boards and commissions
Division 6. Board of Zoning Appeals
Sec. 2-301. Membership; terms.
(a) Composition. The board of zoning appeals shall consist of all individuals appointed to and
serving on the planning commission pursuant to the requirements set forth in Article IV, Division
5, section 2-271 of this chapter. Only regular members of the planning commission shall serve as
voting members of the board of zoning appeals. (Ord. No. 2559-19, 5-6-19)
(b) Regular members. The five (5) regular members of the board shall be appointed by the
city council for three-year terms. The terms of regular members shall expire on May 31 of the
third year of such term and until a successor is duly appointed and qualified. Subsequent
appointments shall be for three- year terms. In the event of a vacancy, the council shall appoint
a person to complete the unexpired term. A member of the board may be removed with or
without cause by the city council.
(c) Qualifications. Members of the board shall be qualified voters and residents of the
city. A vacancy shall be deemed to exist in case a member ceases to meet the residency
requirements. The regular members of the board shall be appointed from persons who have
demonstrated an interest in the board of zoning appeals by submission of appropriate city
forms.
(d) Term limits. Regular members of the board may serve up to two, three-year
consecutive terms on any board or commission. Members must sit out one full term before re-
applying to the zoning board of appeals.
(Code 1976, § 1-401; Ord. No. 2689-25, 3-3-25)
Sec. 2-302. Organization.
(a) A staff liaison to the board of zoning appeals shall be appointed by the city manager and
shall be subject to the administrative rules and regulations of the city.
(b) The board shall elect its own chair and vice-chair. Subject to such limitations as may be
imposed by the city council at any time, the board shall provide its own rules and procedure,
determine the date and time of meetings and, upon proper notice, shall conduct all public
hearings when necessary and desirable and in accordance with all requirements of local and
state laws. The bylaws of the board and any amendments shall be submitted to the city council
upon their adoption. Such bylaws and any amendments shall be deemed to be approved by the
city council unless the city council takes action to modify such bylaws or amendments within 30
days after submission. No member of the board shall consider or vote upon any question in
which the member is directly or indirectly interested.
(c) The board of zoning appeals shall keep proper records of its proceedings, and such records
shall be maintained by the staff liaison or the liaison's designee.
(Code 1976, § 1-402)
Sec. 2-303. Stipends and expenses of members.
(a) Stipends. Each of the five regular members of the board of zoning appeals shall receive
a stipend of $49/per month. Members of the board of zoning appeals shall receive the stipend
as provided by Sec. 2-273 of this chapter.
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 7a) Page 11
Title: First reading of ordinance amending city code chapter 2 related to boards and commissions
(b) Expenses of members. The members of the board of zoning appeals may be reimbursed
for actual expenses to the extent that funds therefore are provided in the annual city budget
adopted by the city council. The board shall properly account for its receipts and expenditures
of monies in accordance with established city procedures.
(Code 1976, § 1-403; Ord. No. 2689-25, 3-3-25)
Sec. 2-304. Powers and duties.
The board of zoning appeals shall have the following powers and duties to:
(1) (a) Hear and decide on appeals from any order, requirement, permit decision or refusal or
determination made by the zoning administrator under the zoning chapter and from any
interpretation of the text of the zoning chapter, or any location of the boundary of a zoning
district as shown on the official zoning map made by the zoning administrator, in accordance
with all requirements of local and state laws.
(2) (b) Hear and decide on requests for variances from the terms of the zoning chapter in the
manner and subject to the standards and requirements set forth in the zoning chapter and
applicable state laws.
(3) (c) Communicate with the city council its recommendations, records of proceedings and
any other method of reporting as may be deemed appropriate by the city council.
(4) (d) Act in an advisory capacity to the city council and hear and make recommendations to
the city council on all matters referred to the board or upon which it is required to act under
the zoning chapter.
(5) (e) Submit to the city council an annual report of the activities of the commission
during the previous year.
(Code 1976, § 1-404; Ord. No. 2689-25, 3-3-25)
Sec. 2-305. Decision subject to appeal to the city council.
Any party aggrieved by a decision of the board of zoning appeals may appeal the decision to the
city council in accordance with the procedures set forth in the zoning chapter of this Code. An
appeal shall be filed with the planning department within ten days of issuance of the board of
zoning appeals' decision.
(Code 1976, § 1-405)
Secs. 2-306--2-320. Reserved.
Division 7. Police Advisory Commission
Sec. 2-321. Membership; terms.
(a) Advisory function; composition. The police advisory commission shall be an advisory
commission to the city council. It shall consist of eleven (11) regular members and two (2)
youth members, all appointed as set forth in this section.
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 7a) Page 12
Title: First reading of ordinance amending city code chapter 2 related to boards and commissions
(b) Regular members. Eleven Regular members shall be appointed by the city council for to
three-year terms. The terms of regular members which shall expire on run until May 31 of the
third year of such term year in which their terms expire and until a qualified successor is duly
appointed and qualified. In the event of a vacancy, the city council shall may appoint a person
to complete the unexpired term. Subsequent appointments shall be fore three-year terms. A
member of the commission may be removed with or without cause by the city council.
(c) Youth members. Youth members shall be appointed by the city council to one-year terms.
Youth members shall have the same voting power as regular members. Two voting youth
members, who shall be high school students of a private or public school located in the city,
may be appointed by the city council and serve a term of one year.
(d) Qualifications. Regular members of the police advisory commission shall be qualified voters
and residents of the city. Youth members shall be high school students. A vacancy shall be
deemed to exist if a member ceases to meet the residency requirements qualifications set forth
in this section. All members of the commission shall will be appointed from persons who have
demonstrated an interest in the police advisory commission by submission of appropriate city
forms through the application and appointment process established by the city council.
(e) Term limits. Regular members of the police advisory commission may serve up to two,
three-year consecutive terms on any board or commission. Members must sit out one full term
before re-applying to the police advisory commission.
(Ord. 2603-21, 1-19-21; Ord. No. 2689-25, 3-3-25)
Sec. 2-322. Organization.
(a) A staff liaison to the police advisory commission shall be appointed by the city manager and
shall be subject to the administrative rules and regulations of the city.
(b) The commission shall elect its own chair and vice-chair. Subject to such limitations as may
be imposed by the city council at any time, the commission shall provide its own rules and
procedure, determine the date and time of meetings and, upon proper notice, shall call public
hearings when necessary and desirable and in accordance with all requirements of local and
state laws. The bylaws of the commission and amendments shall be submitted to the city
council upon their adoption. Such bylaws and any amendments shall be deemed to be
approved by the city council unless the city council takes action to modify such bylaws or
amendments within 30 days after submission. No member of the commission shall consider or
vote upon any question in which the member is directly or indirectly interested.
(c) The commission shall keep proper records of its proceedings, and such records shall be
maintained by the staff liaison or the liaison's designee.
Sec. 2-323. Stipends and expense of members.
(a) Stipends. Each of the eleven regular and the two youth members of the police advisory
commission shall receive a stipend of $49/per month.
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 7a) Page 13
Title: First reading of ordinance amending city code chapter 2 related to boards and commissions
(b) Expenses of members. The members of the police advisory commission may be
reimbursed for actual expenses to the extent that funds therefore are provided in the annual
city budget adopted by the city council. The board shall properly account for its receipts and
expenditures of monies in accordance with established city procedures.
(Ord. No. 2689-25, 3-3-25)
Sec. 2-324. Powers and duties.
Under the direction of the city council, The police advisory commission shall have the following
powers perform those functions and duties necessary to:
(a) Carry out their stated mission to enhance the awareness of police department capabilities
and services; provide an opportunity for citizen involvement in police services and to encourage
exchange between the police department and the community.
(b) Submit to the city council an annual report of the activities of the commission during the
previous year; and
(c) Perform other functions as needed to carry out these duties and responsibilities as directed
by the city council and to act in an advisory capacity to the city council.
(Ordinance No. 2242-03, 7-21-03; Ord. No. 2689-25, 3-3-25)
Sec. 2-325—2-330. Reserved.
Division 8. Environment and Sustainability Commission
Sec. 2-331. Purpose.
The purpose of the Environment and Sustainability Commission shall be to:
(a) Provide recommendations to advance city goals, policies, and programs.
(b) Provide advice and assistance to staff and council through collaboration.
(c) Provide leadership in engaging the community, encouraging relationships and
partnerships with neighborhoods, special interest groups, religious institutions, business
leaders, and other commissions.
(d) Serve as a conduit for environmental and sustainable information, topics, and direction
to and from residents and the public.
(Ord. No. 2689-25, 3-3-25)
Sec. 2-332 331. Membership; terms.
(a) The environment and sustainability commission shall be an advisory commission to the
city council. It shall consist of eleven (11) regular members and two (2) youth members, all
appointed as set forth in this section.
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 7a) Page 14
Title: First reading of ordinance amending city code chapter 2 related to boards and commissions
(b) Regular members. Eleven Regular members shall be appointed by the city council for
three-year terms that shall expire on May 31 of the third year in which their terms expire of
such term and until a qualified successor is duly appointed and qualified. The city council should
ensure representation from each city ward, as outlined in Chapter 10 of this code. The city
council will also give preference to applicants representing the business and rental communities
in order to ensure fair representation on the commission. In the event of a vacancy, the city
council shall may appoint a person to complete the unexpired term. Subsequent appointments
shall be for three-year terms. A member of the commission may be removed with or without
cause by the city council.
(c) Youth members. Youth members shall be appointed by the city council to one-year
terms. Youth members shall have the same voting power as regular members. Two voting
youth members, who shall be high school students of a private or public school located in the
city, may be appointed by the city council and serve a term of one year.
(d) Qualifications. Regular members of the Environment and Sustainability commission
shall be qualified voters and residents of the city. Youth members shall be high school students.
except in the case of a business owner or representative. A business owner or representative
need not be a resident of the city. A vacancy shall be deemed to exist if a member ceases to
meet the residency requirements set forth in this section. All members of the commission shall
will be appointed through the application and appointment process established by the city
council. from persons who have demonstrated an interest in the commission by submission of
appropriate city forms and exhibit high energy, leadership, and a commitment to the
environment and sustainability.
(e) Term limits. Regular members of the environment and sustainability commission may
serve up to two, three-year consecutive terms on any board or commission. Members must sit
out one full term before re-applying to the environment and sustainability commission.
(Ord. No. 2537-18, 6-4-18; Ord. 2603-21, 1-19-21; Ord. No. 2689-25, 3-3-25)
Sec. 2-333 332. Organization.
(a) A staff liaison to the environment and sustainability commission shall be appointed by
the city manager and shall be subject to the administrative rules and regulations of the city.
(b) The commission shall elect its own chair and vice-chair. Subject to such limitations as
may be imposed by the city council at any time, the commission shall provide its own rules and
procedure, determine the date and time of meetings and, upon proper notice, shall call public
hearings when necessary and desirable and in accordance with all requirements of local and
state laws. The bylaws of the commission and amendments shall be submitted to the city
council upon their adoption. Such laws and any amendments shall be deemed to be approved
by the city council unless the city council takes action to modify such bylaws or amendments
within 30 days after submission. No member of the commission shall consider or vote upon any
question in which the member is directly or indirectly interested.
(c) The commission shall include any number of working groups focused on identified
special topics or projects and be led by at least one commissioner.
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 7a) Page 15
Title: First reading of ordinance amending city code chapter 2 related to boards and commissions
(d) (c) The commission shall keep proper records of its proceedings, and such records shall be
maintained by the staff liaison or the liaison’s designees.
Sec. 2-334 333. Stipends and expenses of members.
(a) Stipends. Each of the eleven regular and the two youth members of the environment
and sustainability commission shall receive a stipend of $49/per month.
(b) Expenses of members. The members of the environment and sustainability commission
may be reimbursed for actual expenses to the extent that funds therefore are provided in the
annual city budget adopted by the city council. The board shall properly account for its receipts
and expenditures of monies in accordance with established city procedures.
(Ord. No. 2689-25, 3-3-25)
Sec. 2-335 334. Powers and duties.
The environment and sustainability commission shall have the following powers and duties to:
(1) (a) Advise the city council with respect to environment and sustainability issues
arising out of or in connection with the plans or operations of any city department or agency
and recommend the adoption of such specific policies or actions as may be needed to enhance
the city’s environmental stewardship.
(2) (b) Elicit community feedback and direction, including direct engagement, social
media, annual events and fairs, etc.
(3) (c) Reach out to the full community as well as to special populations with
communication and educational efforts related to the environment and sustainability.
(4) (d) Establish work groups to focus on specific areas of interest, special projects, and
ongoing concerns. Work group representation should be broadened to emphasize greater
diversity, inclusiveness, and specific issue expertise with non-commission members from the
general community.
(5) (e) Submit to the city council an annual report of the activities of the commission
during the previous year.
(f) The commission shall have such additional powers and duties as the city council shall
from time to time determine. Perform other functions as needed to carry out these duties and
responsibilities as directed by the city council and to act in an advisory capacity to the city
council.
(Ordinance No. 2438-13, 4-1-13; Ord. No. 26825, 3-3-25)
Sec. 2-336 335 --2-349. Reserved.
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 7a) Page 16
Title: First reading of ordinance amending city code chapter 2 related to boards and commissions
Section 2. Effective date and term. This ordinance shall take effect 15 days after publication
according to law.
Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council [insert date]:
___________________________________ _________________________________
Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor
Attest: Approved as to form and execution:
____________________________________ _____________________________________
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Soren M. Mattick, city attorney
First Reading February 17, 2026
Second Reading March 2, 2026
Date of publication March 12, 2026
Date ordinance takes effect March 27, 2026
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: February 17, 2026
Action agenda item: 7b
Executive summary
Title: Resolutions authorizing agreements for Greenway-Cedar Trail Connection and
Streambank Restoration project (4025-2000) - Ward 2
Recommended action: Motion to adopt resolutions authorizing the city to enter into a
cooperative construction agreement with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for
Greenway-Cedar Trail Connection and Streambank Restoration project (4025-2000).
Policy consideration: Does the city support partnering with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed
District (MCWD) to construct the Minnehaha Creek Greenway–Cedar Trail connection?
Summary: In 2026, MCWD will construct a 1,000-foot asphalt trail connecting Meadowbrook
Road/Powell Road to the Cedar Lake Regional Trail. The new segment will run alongside
Minnehaha Creek and pass under the regional trail, freight rail and light rail bridges. The project
also includes buckthorn removal, selective streambank restoration, and limited tree removal
necessary to safely construct the trail.
MCWD is serving as the lead agency for this joint project. Construction is anticipated to occur
during the summer of 2026, led and managed by MCWD. Once complete, the new trail segment
will be owned and maintained by the City of St. Louis Park.
A public hearing was held at the Feb. 2, 2026, council meeting. The attached discussion
provides information addressing questions that were presented during the public hearing or
thereafter.
To move the project toward construction, MCWD is requesting that the city enter into three
agreements that will define the partnership related to construction, funding, ownership and
long-term maintenance of the trail.
Financial or budget considerations: This project is included in the city’s 2026 capital
improvement plan (CIP) at a cost of $300,000. After refinements in the project plan, the city’s
share of the project is $415,00 and will be paid for using general obligation bonds.
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a variety of options for
people to make their way around the city comfortably, safely and reliably.
Supporting documents: Discussion
Resolutions
Draft cooperative agreements with Minnehaha Creek Watershed
District and Metropolitan Council
Prepared by: Jack Sullivan, assistant city engineer
Reviewed by: Debra Heiser, engineering director; Amelia Cruver, finance director
Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 7b) Page 2
Title: Resolutions authorizing agreements for Greenway-Cedar Trail Connection and Streambank Restoration
project (4025-2000) - Ward 2
Discussion
Background: The Greenway–Cedar Trail Connection and Streambank Restoration project will
build a 1,000-foot trail from Meadowbrook Road/Powell Road to the Cedar Lake Regional Trail,
running alongside Minnehaha Creek and passing under the Regional trail, freight rail and light
rail bridges. The work also includes buckthorn removal, streambank restoration in select
locations and limited tree removal, which is necessary to safely construct the trail.
Information regarding this project was shared with the city council in a written report at the
Jan. 20 study session. The study session report includes recommendations for the elements to
include in this project. A summary of the information in the report:
• History of planning and partnership between MCWD and the city
• Description of the project scope
• Overview of project agreements
An overview of the recommended design for this project was presented at the city council
meeting on Feb. 2, 2026. The mayor opened the public hearing, inviting members of the public
to speak regarding the recommended design. Two residents spoke during the public hearing.
The following is a summary and staff responses to the questions from the public hearing and
from council members:
1) How wide is the trail and will it be paved or a boardwalk?
The trail will be a ten‑foot‑wide asphalt paved trail designed for multi‑use, accommodating
both pedestrians and bicyclists.
2) Will e-bikes be allowed?
E‑bikes will be permitted on the trail, consistent with the rules applied to all other trails in
the community and aligned with the practices of the Three Rivers Park District’s Cedar Lake
Trail that connects to this new trail.
3) How will buckthorn removal be accomplished? Where is the tree removal occurring?
Tree removal will occur on both sides of the trail alignment to provide the necessary space
for construction and long‑term maintenance of the trail. Buckthorn removal will also be
completed to support native vegetation and improve views of the creek. Ongoing buckthorn
management will continue as funding allows, consistent with established city and
watershed practices.
4) How is the trail planned to connect into the existing Greenway trail system east of Oxford
Street/Meadowbrook Avenue?
The trail will cross at the Oxford Street, Meadowbrook Avenue and Powell Road intersection
at grade. The city is planning a reconstruction project for Oxford Street and Meadowbrook
Avenue in 2028 and 2029, and staff will evaluate opportunities at this intersection to
enhance safety for the trail crossing.
Project agreements: On Sept. 9, 2024, the city council adopted a resolution expressing the
city’s intent to partner on the project, utilize city‑owned parcels for portions of the trail, and
provide half of the trail construction cost.
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 7b) Page 3
Title: Resolutions authorizing agreements for Greenway-Cedar Trail Connection and Streambank Restoration
project (4025-2000) - Ward 2
The resolution did not approve a final project nor commit the city to funding. However, it
established the basis for project agreements among the watershed district, Creekwest LLC and
the Metropolitan Council.
Attached is draft language for Cooperative Agreements with the MCWD and the license
agreement with Metropolitan Council/ Hennepin County Regional Rail Authority (HCRRA).
Staff is recommending that the city council authorize the mayor and city manager to execute
the following two agreements, supporting agreements and any amendments to the final
agreements:
1. Cooperative Agreement between MCWD and the city.
Under this agreement, MCWD will construct a trail on both city-owned property and a
portion of land currently owned by Creekwest LLC that will be deeded to the city. The
agreement also includes the city’s commitment to fund fifty percent of the construction
costs. After construction is complete, MCWD will transfer the trail to the city, which will
then assume full ownership and long-term maintenance responsibilities.
This Cooperative Agreement includes four supporting agreements:
a. Easement Agreement (between MCWD and the City)
Grants MCWD access to city-owned property for trail construction, buckthorn
management, and long-term creek maintenance.
b. Temporary Construction Easement (between MCWD and the City)
Provides MCWD access to four city-owned parcels needed for trail construction.
c. Temporary Construction Easement (between MCWD and the City)
Allows MCWD access to construct the trail on land being conveyed to the city
from Creek West LLC.
d. Project Agreement (between Creekwest LLC, the MCWD and the City)
Conveys approximately 1,100 square feet of private property from Creekwest
LLC to the city to support trail construction along Minnehaha Creek.
2. A license agreement between the Metropolitan Council, Hennepin County Regional Rail
Authority (HCRRA) and the city.
This agreement provides the city with the authority to use, operate, and maintain the
new trail segment located on HCRRA property adjacent to the Cedar Lake Regional Trail.
The license establishes the city’s long-term responsibilities for ongoing trail operations
and maintenance within the HCRRA corridor.
Financial or budget considerations: The city’s share of the project was presented at the Feb. 2,
2026, public hearing as $415,000. For a detailed breakdown of the funding structure, refer to
the public hearing staff report from Feb. 2, 2026.
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 7b) Page 4
Title: Resolutions authorizing agreements for Greenway-Cedar Trail Connection and Streambank Restoration
project (4025-2000) - Ward 2
The city’s contribution of $415,000 exceeds the original budget; however, finance staff have
confirmed that the 2026 general obligation bonds can accommodate this increase. The project
remains a 50/50 cost‑share with the MCWD. Actual cost
Next steps: To meet the MCWD’s construction schedule, the following timeline is required. This
timing allows the watershed to hire a contractor to complete buckthorn management and
necessary tree removal prior to March 31, 2026 with construction of the trail to occur later in
2026.
City council approval of agreements Feb. 17, 2026
Early tree and buckthorn removal Complete by March 31, 2026
Construction timeline Summer/fall 2026
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 7b) Page 5
Title: Resolutions authorizing agreements for Greenway-Cedar Trail Connection and Streambank Restoration
project (4025-2000) - Ward 2
Resolution No. 26 -__
Authorizing the city to enter into a cooperative agreement
with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for the Greenway to
Cedar Trail Connection & Streambank Restoration Project
City project no. 4025-2000
Whereas, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District in its 2017 Watershed Management
Plan, identified the Greenway to Cedar Trail Connection and Streambank Restoration as a key
bicycle and pedestrian connection from the Minnehaha Creek Preserve to the Cedar Lake LRT
Regional Trail and future Greenline Extension light rail stations, and an opportunity to stabilize
the stream channel and enhance the ecology of Minnehaha Creek; and
Whereas, the City of St. Louis Park finds the project to be consistent with its
Comprehensive Plan goals and has identified this connection as a priority trail connection; and
Whereas, on Sept. 9, 2024, the council approved a resolution of support indicating the
city's intent to partner on the project, utilize city-owned parcels for portions of the trail and
provide half the cost of the trail construction; and
Whereas, the MCWD has completed the final design for this multi-use trail,
Now therefore be it resolved by the city council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota,
that:
The city enters into Cooperative Agreement with Minnehaha Creek Watershed District,
for the following purposes:
To govern the design, easement and property use rights, construction, maintenance and
cost share for the Greenway to Cedar Trail Connection and Streambank Restoration
Project, and
It is further resolved that the mayor and city manager are authorized to execute this
agreement, any amendments to the agreement and supporting agreements.
Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council February 17, 2026:
Kim Keller, city manager
Nadia Mohamed, mayor
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 7b) Page 6
Title: Resolutions authorizing agreements for Greenway-Cedar Trail Connection and Streambank Restoration
project (4025-2000) - Ward 2
Resolution No. 26 -__
Authorizing the city to enter into a license agreement
with the Metropolitan Council and the Hennepin County Regional Rail Authority
for the Greenway to Cedar Trail Connection & Streambank Restoration Project
City project no. 4025-2000
Whereas, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District in its 2017 Watershed Management
Plan, identified the Greenway to Cedar Trail Connection and Streambank Restoration as a key
bicycle and pedestrian connection from the Minnehaha Creek Preserve to the Cedar Lake LRT
Regional Trail and future Greenline Extension light rail stations, and an opportunity to stabilize
the stream channel and enhance the ecology of Minnehaha Creek; and
Whereas, this project is consistent with the City of St. Louis Park’s Comprehensive Plan
goals and has identified this as a priority trail connection; and
Whereas, on Sept. 9, 2024, the council approved a resolution of support indicating the
city's intent to partner on the project, utilize city-owned parcels for portions of the trail and
provide half the cost of the trail construction; and
Whereas, the MCWD has completed the final design for this project; and
Whereas, a portion of this project lies within Hennepin County Regional Rail Authority
(HCRRA) property, due to this, a license agreement with HCRRA is needed,
Now therefore be it resolved by the city council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota,
that the city enters into License Agreement with the Metropolitan Council and the HCRRA, for
the following purposes:
To provide the city with the authority to use, operate, and maintain the trail segment
located on HCRRA property adjacent to the Cedar Lake Regional Trail, and
It is further resolved that the mayor and city manager are authorized to execute this
agreement, any amendments to the agreement and supporting agreements.
Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council February 17, 2026:
Kim Keller, city manager
Nadia Mohamed, mayor
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk
1
Cooperative Agreement
Greenway to Cedar Trail Connection & Streambank Restoration Project
City of St. Louis Park & Minnehaha Creek Watershed District
This Cooperative Agreement (“Agreement”) is made between the Minnehaha Creek Watershed
District (MCWD), a watershed district and political subdivision with powers at Minnesota Statutes
Chapters 103B and 103D, and the City of St. Louis Park (“City”), a home rule charter city of the State of
Minnesota (together, the “parties”).
Recitals
A. MCWD intends to construct a bituminous bicycle/pedestrian trail connecting the Minnehaha Creek
Preserve trail system to the Cedar Lake LRT Regional Trail. The connection will depart from the regional
trail; pass under the METRO Green Line Extension light rail , freight rail, and Cedar Lake LRT Regional
Trail bridges; and run along Powell Road to Meadowbrook Road (“Trail Element”). In addition, MCWD
intends to restore streambank and implement other ecological improvements with respect to the
riparian edge of Minnehaha Creek (“Ecological Element”; together with Trail Element, the “Project”).
B. MCWD and the City coordinated on a feasibility study completed by the MCWD consultant in 2023.
MCWD, in consultation with the City, has selected a trail configuration. The configuration causes the trail
to pass over five parcels of land owned by the City, as well as the Powell Road and Meadowbrook Road
rights-of-way. Also, the City will be deeded in fee a portion of a land parcel owned by Creekwest LLC
("Creekwest") over which the trail will pass and, as necessary, will facilitate MCWD's negotiation of
construction-phase use of that the Creekwood parcel. One of the City parcels, riparian to Minnehaha
Creek, may be a suitable site for floodplain expansion that may be required by the Project.
C. MCWD and the City concur that the Project as conceived will provide water resource and other public
benefits, including new non-motorized transportation options, and wish to coordinate to implement the
Project.
THEREFORE, the parties enter into this Agreement, intending to be legally bound.
Terms
A. Design
1. MCWD has retained Stantec as project designer. The design contract specifies that all duties of care,
warranties and indemnifications will run not only to MCWD, but also to the City with respect to any
improvement of which the City takes ownership or that is on City land.
2. The Trail Element design will extend to the trail terminus at Meadowbrook Road and a curb cut on the
eastern side of Meadowbrook Road. The design will include facilities, signage and markings for the
crossing of Meadowbrook Road. As the City may propose for MCWD concurrence, which would be
withheld only for unreasonable cost, it may include facilities such as benches, picnic tables, trash
receptacles, and bike racks.
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 7b)
Title: Resolutions authorizing agreements for Greenway-Cedar Trail Connection and Streambank Restoration project (4025-2000) - Ward 2
Page 7
2
3.During design, the City will timely specify all city requirements for Project design standards, permits
and approvals. The City will coordinate with MCWD with respect to any permits or approvals that it
requires and timely process MCWD applications without permit review costs, fee or financial assurance.
The City will timely communicate any local requirements regarding traffic; disturbance or occupation of
public ways; subsurface utilities or structures on City real property and right-of-way; and any other
matters within City authority that bear on construction management. The City, in its capacity as property
owner, will cooperate with respect to any permits or approvals required by other units of government,
however MCWD will bear all associated fees.
4.The City has concurred in the 60 percent design for the Trail Element. MCWD will share the 90 percent
design with the City, with respect to which the City will have a right of concurrence. The designer will
prepare final plans consistent with the City-approved 90 percent plans.
B. Easements and Property Use Rights
1. Exhibit A to this Agreement depicts the trail alignment for the Project (“Alignment”). The
Alignment will result in locating the Trail Element on five City parcels:
3892 Texas Avenue South (PID 20-117-21-23-0014)
7853 Edgebrook Drive (PID 20-117-21-23-0015) 7845
Edgebrook Drive (PID 20-117-21-23-0016) 3960
Meadowbrook Road (PID 20-117-21-23-0003) 7750
Powell Road (PID 20-117-21-23-0004)
MCWD and the City concur that MCWD may occupy and alter City real property as necessary or
convenient to implement the Alignment, and will consult during the design process with respect to any
further alignment adjustments or enhancements.
2. During design, MCWD will be consulting with Creekwest, the owner of the Professional Instruments
Corp. (PIC) property at 7800 Powell Road (PID 20-117-21-23-0022), regarding temporary staging and
access use during construction work. The ability of Creekwest to adjust temporary or permanent parking
and traffic movement on its property may allow for construction efficiency or cost savings. This ability
may depend on how City authority applies to PIC’s use of its property or adjacent public right-of-way for
parking and traffic movement.
3. The City has determined that it may allow PIC-related parking to occur on Powell Road during
construction, in order to accommodate District use of the PIC property for construction staging. During
design, on MCWD request, the City will engage with MCWD and Creekwest as to its requirements, so
that MCWD and Creekwest may timely determine the details of MCWD use and occupation of the
Creekwest property during construction. The City, within the bounds of its legal authority and relevant
public considerations, will use its discretion to facilitate the preferred conditions for the MCWD to
construct the Project.
4. During design, the City and MCWD will consult to determine construction access and staging on City
property for Project construction. By the date that the bid solicitation is published, the City will convey
easements to MCWD encumbering the five City parcels referenced in paragraph B.1,
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 7b)
Title: Resolutions authorizing agreements for Greenway-Cedar Trail Connection and Streambank Restoration project (4025-2000) - Ward 2
Page 8
3
above, and affected right-of-way, as follows: (a) a temporary easement conveying access, staging and
construction rights; and (b) a perpetual easement allowing MCWD to enter City property, maintain the
Ecological Element of the Project, and exercise its rights under this Agreement with respect to the Trail
Element. MCWD will bear the cost of engineering or survey work necessary to delineate the burdened
area or areas. The easements will conform materially to Exhibits B and C attached hereto.
C. Construction
1. MCWD may solicit bids for construction and select a contractor in accordance with applicable law.
MCWD will share the bid tabulation with the City and the parties will consult before MCWD selects
alternates, if any, and before it awards a contract. MCWD will structure the bid form to distinguish Trail
and Ecological Element bid prices. If the bid price for the Trail Element exceeds the designer’s opinion of
probable cost by 20 percent, after timely consultation a party may decline to participate in its
construction or funding. On the basis of excessive bids or other circumstances contrary to price or
schedule expectations, MCWD Board of Managers, in its discretion and after the parties’ consultation,
may delete or revise the Ecological Element, or take any other lawful action with respect to it.
2. The construction contract will include the following provisions:
a. Contractor’s warranty, hold harmless, and indemnification terms will run to the benefit of
both MCWD and the City.
b. Contractor must name the City as an additional insured for commercial general liability
(ongoing and completed operations) and any associated umbrella or excess policy up to $2
million per event/annual aggregate, with such coverage being primary and non-contributory.
c. Contractor must obtain and conform to all applicable City approvals and requirements.
3. MCWD, by its consulting designer, will manage construction. The City may attend construction
meetings, and will have a right of concurrence in any work change materially changing, for the Trail
Element, the contract price, design, materials or maintenance requirements. For such a change, MCWD
will notify the City Engineer and provide the City Engineer at least five full business days to review and
respond. If a proposed change order or work change directive requires MCWD Board of Managers
approval, MCWD will notify the City Engineer at least three business days before board consideration.
The City may have additional time, if its concurrence requires specific engineering review. In such a case,
the City Engineer will exercise good faith and diligence to respond as quickly as possible in recognition of
the need to avoid contract delay. The City Manager is authorized to exercise change order and work
change directive concurrence on behalf of the City. The City Manager may delegate all or any part of this
authority to the City Engineer. Any contract delay cost resulting from the City’s contract change review
will be shared equally by the parties.
4. MCWD will give the City notice of substantial completion, and notice of completion. Within 15 days of
each receipt of notice, the City Engineer will concur, or will advise MCWD specifically of its concern
regarding the work or its deviation from the approved design. If the work deviates from the
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 7b)
Title: Resolutions authorizing agreements for Greenway-Cedar Trail Connection and Streambank Restoration project (4025-2000) - Ward 2
Page 9
4
contract or approved design, the parties will consult promptly and in good faith to resolve the matter.
5. Before the Trail Element is opened to public use, MCWD will deliver the designer’s certification of
completion and record drawings to the City Engineer. On delivery of the certification and record
drawings: (a) ownership of the Trail Element will vest in the City; and (b) notwithstanding paragraph F.2,
below, the City will hold harmless and release MCWD from all claims with respect to the design and
construction of the Trail Elements, and assume the obligation to defend and indemnify MCWD with
respect to all liabilities, damages and costs resulting from any third-party claim arising from the design,
construction or use of the Trail Element.
D. Maintenance
1. Exhibit D hereto is a fully executed License Agreement among the Metropolitan Council, the Hennepin
County Regional Railroad Authority, and the City. This License Agreement provides authority for the City
to maintain the Trail Element for a period of at least 20 years, subject to terms therein. Without written
MCWD concurrence, the City will not amend the License Agreement in any respect that renders it
unable to perform its obligations under this section D.
2. The City will maintain, repair and replace the trail facilities and other features and appurtenances of
the Trail Element for 20 years from the date that completion is certified
(“Maintenance Period”). Any alteration over the Maintenance Period that would deviate materially from
the design must be by agreement of the parties. During the Maintenance Period, the City, with MCWD
assistance, will take steps necessary to protect the right to maintain the Trail Element on the real
property of third parties. If within the Maintenance Period a third party advises of an intent lawfully to
withdraw the right for any part of the Trail Element to remain on its real property, the City and MCWD
will consult immediately and cooperate to preserve that right.
3. MCWD will maintain, repair and replace the Ecological Element in its discretion. The Ecological
Element will include initial buckthorn management. The City and MCWD together will identify the need
and responsibility for buckthorn management beyond the initial Project component.
4. As between MCWD and the City, the City will be responsible for day-to-day inspection and
maintenance of the Trail Element, including but not limited to sanitation, inspection for and addressing
hazards resulting from events such as severe weather, and public safety.
5. City and MCWD maintenance, repair and replacement activities will conform to the terms of the
conservation easement conveyed by the City to MCWD and filed on the title as Document No. A9489642
(March 12, 2010).
E. Allocation of Costs
1. MCWD and the City will split evenly the cost of the designer contract. MCWD will pay designer
invoices and invoice the City for its share when the final design has been accepted by the MCWD
Board of Managers, with a further accounting when the MCWD has accepted the project. If the design
contract is terminated before either or both of these milestones is reached, MCWD will invoice the
City at that time. The City will make payment within 30 days of a request.
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 7b)
Title: Resolutions authorizing agreements for Greenway-Cedar Trail Connection and Streambank Restoration project (4025-2000) - Ward 2
Page 10
5
2. MCWD will be responsible for timely payments to the construction contractor. MCWD and the City
will split evenly that part of the construction contract price associated with the Trail Element, except that
MCWD will bear the payment to Creekwest for the fee conveyance referenced in Recital B, above, and
any associated survey cost. MCWD will bear the entire construction contract price associated with the
Ecological Element. MCWD will transmit documentation of partial and final payments to the City. The
City will reimburse MCWD for its share of costs in accordance with the following schedule:
•51% within 60 days of award of contract to contractor
•49% 60 days after substantial completion of project
3. MCWD has secured a Southwest Community Works grant in the amount of $200,000, applicable to the
Trail Element cost. Each party’s cost will be defrayed by half of the amount of grant funds received.
4. The parties, individually or together, may seek other sources of funding for the Project, provided they
do not impose obligations on the Project in conflict with the terms of this Agreement. External funding
for the Trail Element will be applied to the parties’ funding shares equally. External funding for the
Ecological Element will defray the MCWD cost for that work.
5. Except as explicitly stated otherwise in this Agreement, each party will bear the costs it incurs after
Project completion to fulfill its inspection, maintenance, repair, replacement and other obligations under
this Agreement.
6. Except as explicitly stated in this Agreement, each party will bear its own administrative and other
internal costs to implement the Agreement.
F. Additional Terms
1. This Agreement coordinates the independent activities of the parties to achieve a combined set of
municipal and watershed goals. The Agreement is not a joint powers agreement. Each party retains its
authority to direct the activities for which it is responsible. Neither party is responsible for the acts or
omissions of the other within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes §471.59, subdivision 1a(a).
2. MCWD will hold the City, its council members and employees, harmless, and indemnify them, from
any and all actions, costs (including reasonable attorney fees), damages and liabilities to the degree
they are the result of any action or inaction by MCWD that is the basis for the liability of MCWD in law
or equity, including but not limited to ordinary negligence. The City will hold the MCWD, its board
members and employees harmless, and indemnify them, from any and all actions, costs (including
reasonable attorney fees), damages and liabilities to the degree they are the result of any action or
inaction by the City that is the basis for the liability of the City in law or equity, including but not limited
to ordinary negligence. Notwithstanding the foregoing or any other term of this Agreement, neither
MCWD nor the City waives immunity in tort. This Agreement creates no right in, and waives no
immunity, defense or liability limit with respect to, any third party.
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 7b)
Title: Resolutions authorizing agreements for Greenway-Cedar Trail Connection and Streambank Restoration project (4025-2000) - Ward 2
Page 11
6
3. Only contractual remedies are available for the failure of a party to fulfill the terms of this Agreement.
The parties waive objection to specific performance, injunction and other applicable forms of equitable
relief.
4. Any public materials, including but not limited to Project physical signage, will acknowledge the
collaboration of the parties in the Project and meet any grant requirements for grantor
acknowledgement. MCWD, or the City when the City is the Grantee, is responsible for noticing those
grant requirements to the other party.
5. Each party will comply with all terms of grant agreements applicable to the Project, and cooperate
with the other to that end. Each party will conform to all applicable federal, state, and local provisions of
law applicable to the Project.
6. The parties will administer data provided, produced or obtained under this Agreement in accordance
with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13.
7. A notice permitted or required by this Agreement may be given by delivery, mail or electronic mail
transmission to the following project representatives, or their successors as either party may notify the
other in accordance with this provision:
MCWD:
Gabriel Sherman
Planner-Project Manager
15320 Minnetonka Blvd, Minnetonka, MN 55345
gsherman@minnehahacreek.org
St. Louis Park:
Jack Sullivan
Engineering Project Manager
5005 Minnetonka Blvd.
St. Louis Park, MN 55416
jsullivan@stlouisparkmn.gov
8. A party may not assign this Agreement, in whole or part, without the written consent of the other
party.
9. A waiver by either party of a breach of any term of this Agreement is not a waiver of another breach
of that term or any other term of the Agreement.
10. The provisions of this Agreement are severable. If any term of the Agreement is held by a court of
competent jurisdiction to be contrary to law, the decision will not affect the remaining terms of the
Agreement.
11. This Agreement is to be governed by and construed in accordance with Minnesota law. Any claim
under this Project Agreement will have venue in Hennepin County.
CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 7b)
Title: Resolutions authorizing agreements for Greenway-Cedar Trail Connection and Streambank Restoration project (4025-2000) - Ward 2
Page 12
Metropolitan Council Contract #25I117_________
Metropolitan Council
390 Robert Street
St. Paul, MN 55101
_____________________
_____________________
____________________
____________________
LICENSE AGREEMENT
THIS LICENSE AGREEMENT (“License Agreement”) by and between the
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL (“Council”) and the HENNEPIN COUNTY REGIONAL
RAILROAD AUTHORITY (“HCRRA”), and the City of St. Louis Park, MN (“Licensee”).
The Council, HCRRA, and Licensee are collectively referred to as the “Parties” and
individually as a “Party”.
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Council is authorized pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 473.129
subdivision 7 to lease real property; and
WHEREAS, HCRRA is authorized pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §398A.04 to lease
real property; and
WHEREAS, Council is the owner of property located at approximately 3830 Georgia
Ave S, St. Louis Park, MN 55426 (PID 2011721120001) (“HCRRA Parcel”) and 3900
Pennsylvania Ave S, St. Louis Park, MN 55416 (PID 2011721210002) (“LRT Parcel”) as
described on attached Exhibit A, the (collectively the HCRRA Parcel and the LRT Parcel are
the “Property”); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Property Transfer Agreement between the Council and
the HCRRA”) (Council contract number 16I030; HCRRA contract number A165479), the
Council acquired the HCRRA Parcel and has reconstructed the portion of Cedar Lake LRT
Regional Trail and Minnesota River Bluffs LRT Regional Trail (together, the “Regional
Trail”) adjacent to the METRO Green Line Extension on the HCRRA Parcel. The HCRRA
Parcel is being used temporarily by the Council during construction and will be re-conveyed
in an improved condition to HCRRA upon commencement of METRO Green Line Extension
service; and
WHEREAS, the Council's delegated authority for this License Agreement is its
Director of Engineering and Facilities; and
WHEREAS, HCRRA’s delegated authority for this License Agreement is its Assistant
County Administrator – Public Works; and
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 7b)
Title: Resolutions authorizing agreements for Greenway-Cedar Trail Connection and Streambank Restoration project (4025-2000) - Ward 2
Page 13
Metropolitan Council Contract #25I117_________
WHEREAS, Licensee is interested in using the Property for the operation and
maintenance of the Greenway to Cedar Trail connection (“Trail Connection”); and
WHEREAS, the Council and HCRRA are willing to allow Licensee to use the Property
under the terms and conditions of this License Agreement.
NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration the receipt of which is
hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. Premises. The Council and HCRRA agree to allow Licensee to use the portions of the
Property on which the Trail Connection has been constructed as depicted on the attached
Exhibit B.
2. Use. The Property may be used by the Licensee and its agents, employees and invitees
for the operation and maintenance of the Trail Connection. The Licensee’s use of the
Property is non-exclusive and is subject to the rights of others.
3. Term. This License will have a term of 20 years from the Effective Date and
automatically renews for successive term of 20 years unless terminated by either party
as provided herein. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Council may terminate this
License Agreement at any time upon written notice to the Licensee if the Council
determines, in its sole discretion, that the Trail Connection or related improvements, or
Trail-users interfere with or adversely impact the safe or efficient operation of the LRT
system or freight rail operations on the “LRT Parcel”; and HCRRA may terminate this
License Agreement at any time upon written notice to the Licensee if HCRRA
determines, in its sole discretion, that the Trail Connection or related improvements, or
Trail-users interfere with or adversely impact the safe or efficient operation of the Cedar
Lake Regional LRT Trail located on the HCRRA Parcel.
4. Rent. Licensee will not pay any rent for the term of this License Agreement.
5. Maintenance.
5.1 The Licensee is solely responsible for establishing maintenance standards for the
Trail Connection. The Licensee will maintain the Trail Connection in good
condition, including vegetation control, trash removal, and general upkeep; use
reasonable precaution to prevent waste, damage, or injury; and not create or permit
any nuisance on the Property.
5.2 The use of burning, disking operations, or chemicals to control vegetation is
prohibited without prior approval from the Council.
5.3 The Licensee is responsible for the removal of graffiti from the Trail Connection
infrastructure.
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 7b)
Title: Resolutions authorizing agreements for Greenway-Cedar Trail Connection and Streambank Restoration project (4025-2000) - Ward 2
Page 14
Metropolitan Council Contract #25I117_________
5.4 Every two years following the Effective Date of this License Agreement, the
Licensee shall inspect Trail Connection and provide a copy of each inspection
upon request by the Council or HCRRA.
6. Standard Notice of Work Procedures. If the Licensee or its contractors intend to work within
50 feet of the centerline of the LRT track or freight rail track, or within 50 feet of Metro
Transit rail facilities or structures, the Licensee will be required to obtain a Metro Transit
Work Permit and will follow the Metro Transit Work Permit Procedure available at
https://www.metrotransit.org/light-rail-permitting. Additional requirements for work
Fouling the LRT Work Zone or the Freight Rail Work Zone include additional requirements,
such as flagging and training, further detailed in the Metro Transit Work Permit Procedure
and Freight Rail Right-of-Entry available at https://www.metrotransit.org/light-rail-
permitting. The Council will not disallow work, encroachment, or other activities within the
LRT Work Zone or Freight Rail Work Zone unless the Council can demonstrate that such
activities are in direct conflict with the safe and efficient operation of the LRT or freight rail
systems.
6.1 “LRT Work Zone” means as any area where work may result in Fouling of the LRT
track.
6.2 “Freight Rail Work Zone” means as any area where work may result in Fouling of
the freight rail track.
6.3 “Foul” or “Fouling” means the placement of an individual or equipment will be within
12 feet of the centerline of a light rail track or within 20 feet of the overhead catenary
system (the “LRT Work Zone”) or in such proximity to a track that the individual or
equipment could be struck by a moving train, or in any case may come within 25 feet
of the centerline of freight tracks (the “Freight Rail Work Zone”).
6.4 Work performed beneath a bridge does not require a Metro Transit Work Permit and
is not considered Fouling if it is limited to routine maintenance activities, such as snow
plowing or graffiti removal, and does not occur on the bridge deck, embankment, or
involve equipment (e.g., cranes, excavators) capable of contacting the track, a train,
or on-track equipment in the event of a tip-over, collapse, or other failure. Construction
or structural maintenance activities that could affect the bridge’s structural integrity
or train operations require a Metro Transit Work Permit and compliance with Flagging
and Right-of-Entry (Freight Rail ROE) procedures, as outlined in the Metro Transit
Work Permit Procedure.
7. Liability. Licensee agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the Council and HCRRA
from and against any and all losses, claims, actions, lawsuits, damages, liabilities, and
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 7b)
Title: Resolutions authorizing agreements for Greenway-Cedar Trail Connection and Streambank Restoration project (4025-2000) - Ward 2
Page 15
Metropolitan Council Contract #25I117_________
expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees) arising out of or resulting from the acts,
omissions, or failure to perform any obligations under this License Agreement by the
Licensee
8. General Provisions.
7.1 Entire Agreement. This License Agreement (including any and all exhibits and
amendments hereto, which are hereby incorporated herein by reference)
constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties and supersedes all oral or
written proposals, prior agreements and any other prior communications between
the Parties concerning the subject matter of this License Agreement. Any
modifications or changes to this License Agreement shall be effective only where
mutually agreed upon in writing by both Parties. This License Agreement shall be
fully binding upon, inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by the Parties hereto
and their successors and/or assigns.
7.2 Effective Date and Termination. The effective date of this License will be the date
this License is signed by the last party to sign it (as indicated by the date associated
with that Party’s signature), the “Effective Date”.
7.3 Notices. A party will send all notices or demands required under the terms of this
License Agreement or any statute or ordinance either by:
(a) certified mail;
(b) email, as long as the recipient acknowledges receipt by email or otherwise in
writing; or
(c) delivered in person to the other party addressed to the following authorized
representatives:
City of St. Louis Park
[TITLE]
[ADDRESS]
Metro Transit
Director, Engineering and Facilities
560 Sixth Avenue North
Minneapolis, MN 55411
With copy to:
Metropolitan Council
Director, Real Estate
390 Robert Street North
St. Paul, MN 55101
7.4 No Agency or Joint Venture. The parties agree and acknowledge that the
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 7b)
Title: Resolutions authorizing agreements for Greenway-Cedar Trail Connection and Streambank Restoration project (4025-2000) - Ward 2
Page 16
Metropolitan Council Contract #25I117_________
relationship of the parties is in the nature of an independent contractor. This
License Agreement will not be deemed to create a partnership, franchise or joint
venture and neither party is the other party's agent, partner, franchisee, employee
or representative.
7.5 Severability. Should any provision of this License Agreement be held to be void,
invalid or unenforceable, such provision will be enforced to the maximum extent
permissible, and the remaining provisions of this Agreement will remain in full
force and effect.
7.6 Authority to Execute. The Parties mutually represent and warrant that (i) each has
the legal power and authority to execute and perform this License Agreement and
to grant the rights and assume its obligations herein and (ii) that the person(s)
executing this License Agreement below on each party's behalf is/are duly
authorized to do so and that the signatures of such person(s) is/are legally
sufficient to bind the parties hereunder.
7.7 Successor and Assigns. This License Agreement shall be binding on the Parties
and their successors and/or assigns.
7.8 No Third-Party Beneficiaries. Except as expressly provided in this License
Agreement, no person not a party to this License Agreement shall have any rights
or entitlement of any nature under it.
7.9 Assignment. Licensee agrees to use the property for the purpose stated in this
License Agreement and shall not assign, subcontract, sublet, or transfer this lease
without receiving express written consent from the Council and HCRRA.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have, by the undersigned individual so
authorized, executed and delivered this License Agreement as of the Effective Date.
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
By: _____________________
Marilyn Porter
Its: Director of Engineering & Facilities
Date: ____________________
HENNEPIN COUNTY REGIONAL RAILROAD AUTHORITY
By: ______________________
Name: ___________________
Its: ______________________
Date: ____________________
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 7b)
Title: Resolutions authorizing agreements for Greenway-Cedar Trail Connection and Streambank Restoration project (4025-2000) - Ward 2
Page 17
Metropolitan Council Contract #25I117_________
CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK
By: ______________________
Name: ___________________
Its: ______________________
Date: ____________________
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 7b)
Title: Resolutions authorizing agreements for Greenway-Cedar Trail Connection and Streambank Restoration project (4025-2000) - Ward 2
Page 18
Metropolitan Council Contract #25I117_________
EXHIBIT A
Description of the HCRRA Parcel
(PID 2011721120001)
General Location: East end of Louisiana Ave. to St. Louis Park/Hopkins Border
Property Identification No(s): 20-117-21-12-0001
Tract Index (Abstract): Part of the Northeast ¼ of the Northeast ¼
Part of the Northwest ¼ of the Northeast ¼
Part of the Northeast ¼ of the Northwest ¼
Part of the Northwest ¼ of the Northwest ¼
Part of the Southwest ¼ of the Northwest ¼
Section 20, Township 117, Range 21
HCRRA Property Map No: Map No. 3
Description:
A strip of land 100 feet in width extending over and across the North Half of the Northeast Quarter,
and the Northwest Quarter, of Section 20, Township 117 North, Range 21 West of the Fifth
Principal Meridian, said strip of land being 50 feet in width on each side of the center line of the
main track of the Minneapolis and St. Louis Railway Company (now the Chicago and North
Western Transportation Company), as said main track center line was originally located and
established over and across said Section 20.
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 7b)
Title: Resolutions authorizing agreements for Greenway-Cedar Trail Connection and Streambank Restoration project (4025-2000) - Ward 2
Page 19
Metropolitan Council Contract #25I117_________
EXHIBIT A
Description of the LRT Parcel
(PID 2011721210002)
General Location: From a point on the North line of the NE1/4 of the NE1/4 of Section 20,
Township 117 N., Range 21 W. (East of Louisiana Avenue South), traversing Southwesterly to the
St. Louis Park/Hopkins Border
Property Identification No(s): 20-117-21-21-0002
Description:
That part of Section 20, Township 117 N., Range 21 W., more particularly described as follows:
A strip of land approximately 60 feet in width extending over and across the W 3/4 of the N 1/2 of
said Section 20, and a strip of land approximately 66 feet in width extending over the NE1/4 of
the NE1/4 of said Section 20, all in Township 117 N., Range 21 W., all lying Northerly of the
following described line;
Commencing at the Southeast corner of the SE1/4 of Section 17, Township 117, Range 21;
thence on an assumed bearing of North 00 degrees 40 minutes 40 seconds East along the East line
of said SE1/4 of Section 17 for 555.09 feet;
thence return South 00 degrees 40 minutes 40 seconds West along said SE1/4 of Section 17 for
89.00 feet;
thence South 61 degrees 51 minutes 33 seconds West for 347.37 feet;
thence South 87 degrees 31 minutes 22 seconds West for 26.00 feet;
thence Southwesterly for 452.92 feet along a non-tangential curve, concave to the Southeast, radius
991.49 feet and central angle 26 degrees 10 minutes 24 seconds, the chord of said curve bears
South 44 degrees 45 minutes 41 seconds West;
thence South 88 degrees 25 minutes 22 seconds West not tangent to last described curve for 88.37
feet;
thence Northeasterly for 278.65 feet along a non-tangential curve, concave to the Southeast, radius
1066.49 feet and central angle 14 degrees 58 minutes 11 seconds, the chord of said curve bears
North 36 degrees 33 minutes 20 seconds East;
thence South 64 degrees 23 minutes 29 seconds West not tangent to last described curve for 536.68
feet to the North line of said Section 20;
thence South 88 degrees 25 minutes 22 seconds West along said North line of Section 20 for 9.82
feet to the actual point of beginning of the line herein described;
thence South 64 degrees 23 minutes 29 seconds West for 284.91 feet;
thence North 00 degrees 21 minutes 29 seconds East for 6.67 feet;
thence South 64 degrees 23 minutes 29 seconds West for 1468.34 feet;
thence South 64 degrees 23 minutes 29 seconds West for 913 feet, more or less;
thence South 64 degrees 23 minutes 29 seconds West for 2006.15 feet to the West line of the
NW1/4 of said Section 20;
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 7b)
Title: Resolutions authorizing agreements for Greenway-Cedar Trail Connection and Streambank Restoration project (4025-2000) - Ward 2
Page 20
Metropolitan Council Contract #25I117_________
EXHIBIT B
Trail Connection
City council meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 7b)
Title: Resolutions authorizing agreements for Greenway-Cedar Trail Connection and Streambank Restoration project (4025-2000) - Ward 2
Page 21
Meeting: Special study session
Meeting date: February 17, 2026
Discussion item: 1
Executive summary
Title: Consider proposed study session topic: St. Louis Park separation ordinance
Recommended action: City council and city manager review the proposed agenda topic and
determine next steps.
Policy consideration: Does the city council want to move forward with additional discussion of
a separation ordinance?
Summary: Council Members Bashore, Baudhuin and Engelking submitted a study session topic
proposal related to a separation ordinance. City staff reviewed the proposal in consultation
with the city attorney and provided a high-level analysis of the request. The next step is for the
council to decide, as a group, if they want to schedule a future study session discussion on the
proposed topic.
Financial or budget considerations: None at this time.
Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable.
Supporting documents: Study session topic proposal and staff analysis
Prepared by: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk
Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager
Special study session of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 1)
Title: Consider proposed study session topic: St. Louis Park separation ordinance
Page 2
City Council
Study Session Topic Proposal
Staff Analysis
Date:2/11/26
Prepared by:Bryan Kruelle, police chief
Proposed agenda topic:Examine the practical, tactical, and legal avenues and
consequences of passing a formal separation ordinance from federal immigration
enforcement in three areas: (1) Formally limiting St. Louis Park police from cooperating
with or employing crowd control in coordination with immigration enforcement; (2)
Establishing a formal reporting protocol for city employees who interact with federal
immigration enforcement; (3) Limiting the usage of city resources and property by
federal immigration authorities.
Staff analysis of request: (Please provide a high-level review of the proposed topic.
Focus on key points, facts, impact, legal and/or future considerations.)
Multiple cities in the Twin Cities metro area have considered adopting some form of a
separation ordinance and some have done so, including Minneapolis, St. Paul, Richfield,
and Burnsville. These ordinances are in addition to what are largely uniform policies and
procedures for cities in Hennepin County that have recognized local police agencies do
not enforce federal immigration law or ask about immigration status unless required by
law. In addition, the City of Minneapolis bans the use of city property, including parking
lots, ramps, and garages, for use in civil immigration enforcement. Clear signage is
required to be in place at these locations, noting the restrictions. The Cities of Richfield
and Burnsville have a similar ordinance in place prohibiting federal immigration laws
from being enforced on city properties. It is staff’s understanding that the cities of St.
Paul and Golden Valley are currently working on proposed updates with similar changes.
(1) Formally limiting St. Louis Park police from cooperating with or employing crowd
control in coordination with immigration enforcement
The St. Louis Park Police Department’s mission is to provide a safe community through
quality service, community partnerships, and professionalism. The mission is grounded
in and guided by a commitment to community-oriented policing. Two critical core values
are at the center of this commitment: a belief that ethics and integrity are the
foundation of public trust and confidence, and all meaningful relationships are built on
these values. To achieve the mission, the department is driven by a widely held belief
that the prevention of crime and disorder is the best solution to protect our community.
Special study session of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 1)
Title: Consider proposed study session topic: St. Louis Park separation ordinance
Page 3
These beliefs and approaches are what lead us to confront the many challenges that
routinely confront us. Today, as our mission and trust in the community are tested
through the federal enforcement of immigration, now more than ever, it is vital that we
continue to consistently lean into the very elements that have defined our core values
and police-response systems that have proven the test of time to be effective in St.
Louis Park.
Trust and effectiveness in the St. Louis Park Police-Community relationship emanate
from a comprehensive and detailed training model, an expansive oversight system, and
a passion for service. These structures, guided by sound policy and execution, drive our
police responses to all calls-for-service, including those that may be attached to
immigration in some form or another. While it is clear that the St. Louis Park Police
Department does not enforce federal immigration law, request documentation of
immigration status, or maintain that data in its records, we may respond to federal
requests for assistance to provide available support services, such as traffic control.
Additionally, police officers have a sworn oath to uphold the Constitution and protect
everyone in our community. In doing so, we have a demonstrated history of effectively
honoring individual First Amendment rights and their placement within the delivery
system of public safety. This has not always been easy or straightforward, but our
training and delivery have consistently demonstrated how much we value our police-
community relationship.
We feel strongly that not responding when requested would be an abandonment of our
commitment to the community in this moment that has divided so many around us. It
would also relinquish control and influence on a scene to any other agency, whether or
not the agency shares our values. Our goal in responding to any scene where emotions
are high is to lower the temperature and keep everyone safe by leveraging the skills that
local police officers use every day and are specialists in. Our officers are highly trained in
de-escalation, relationship building, use-of-force decision making, and application of the
law. These are the very things that keep our community members and infrastructure
safe, and why we are proud to call our police officers our own. This is the moment we
should trust them the most, to do the very things they do on every other day, on every
other call, consistently, and effectively. They are best suited to navigate this
environment and represent St. Louis Park.
Additionally, federal immigration enforcement and local policing do not always fit neatly
into separate containers. Should we seek to limit our police officers from cooperating or
coordinating with immigration enforcement in any manner, the inherent subjectivity of
these terms, and sobering realities of our job that all too often place our men and
women in unpredictable and dangerous situations, are the very reasons we may also
put them in legal jeopardy if and when these realities come into conflict with one
another. Our community expects our police officers to protect and serve them and our
city’s greater interests. Ceding this responsibility to anyone else would be abandoning
this truth.
Special study session of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 1)
Title: Consider proposed study session topic: St. Louis Park separation ordinance
Page 4
(2) Establishing a formal reporting protocol for city employees who interact with federal
immigration enforcement
Existing city protocols cover this, where any formal interactions with federal
immigration enforcement require department head notification by the employee.
Employees are further instructed that they are not authorized representatives of the
city in this realm and that assistance from PD should be requested. Initial protocols were
distributed in December 2025 with updates provided in January 2026 and supervisor
training in early February 2026. Additionally, protocols are in place within the police
department for any request for assistance involving a federal law enforcement action. In
those situations, a duty sergeant should respond to the scene to assess the operation
and need for support. The duty sergeant should then contact the police department’s
watch commander to ensure a member of the command staff is also aware.
The City of Minneapolis separation ordinance requires all city employees to notify their
department director of any violations, as well as report the incident via email to a
centralized source within the city.
(3) Limiting the usage of city resources and property by federal immigration authorities
The city should be cognizant that, regardless of any policy or laws, federal agents may,
in fact, ignore the ordinance and proceed with entry or staging operations on city
property.1 Irrespective of the ordinance, city employees and officials should not
physically obstruct such efforts, which could result in personal injury, property damage,
criminal charges for obstruction of justice, and a civil lawsuit against the city.2 To that
end, it should be understood that enforcement of this ordinance be akin to nuisance
and property maintenance violations; the police department may make contact with the
goal of stopping the behavior (i.e., the federal immigration officials moving from the
area), and/or the city may issue a cease and desist letter similar to that issued by St.
Paul, not immediate criminal punishment through issuance of a misdemeanor citation.
Additionally, legal review raises questions about the enforceability of the ordinance.
Most, if not all, MN cities that have passed an ordinance have openly stated that
enforcement should not be expected. Even when cities and elected officials clearly state
to community members that the ordinance is intended to be a deterrent and not
enforceable, there can be significant confusion leading to additional loss of trust by
residents in their local governments. As an example, please see this social media string
1 St. Paul issued a cease and desist letter to federal official for use of city property for staging
despite city charter limitations on such use: https://www.stpaul.gov/sites/default/files/city-
attorney/cease-and-desist-federal-immigration-enforcement-use-park-parking-lots.pdf. DHS has
not responded to the letter and continues to engage in staging operations on city property, both
in St. Paul and in Minneapolis (which has an anti-staging ordinance provision), as outlined in the
recent lawsuit filed by Minnesota and the Twin Cities:
https://www.ag.state.mn.us/Office/Communications/2026/docs/00190_DHS_Complaint.pdf.
2 https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71492219/1/united-states-v-state-of-minnesota/.
Special study session of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 1)
Title: Consider proposed study session topic: St. Louis Park separation ordinance
Page 5
from the days following a neighboring city passing an ordinance restricting the use of
city-owned and controlled property. Some of this confusion was also reflected in the St.
Louis Park public comment from Feb. 10, where some members of the public speaking
in support of an ordinance acknowledged that it would be symbolic while others lauded
it because then we could restrict ICE from public spaces.
Resources required: (Include relevant information such as cost, staffing, capacity)
Assuming that there is not an expectation that police officers would enforce violations
on city property by immigration enforcement personnel beyond simple advisement and
documentation, we should expect additional support needed from communications,
police, administrative and elected leaders to address questions and concerns. This
would be needed in addition to the routine call-for-service handling of officers in the
field.
Should an ordinance be challenged in court, the way in which the suit is filed would
impact whether we have insurance coverage for legal defense or whether the city would
be responsible for that cost.
Other dependencies: (Include relevant information that could impact this proposal,
such as: other agencies/jurisdictions, a pending policy discussion or action by council on
related item, additional research that may be required to answer pending questions)
N/A
Projected timeline:
The specific policy objectives to be addressed in an ordinance would guide the policy
development process and the amount of time that is needed for legal review and
drafting of language. Once that is completed, typical city process would include a study
session discussion to review the draft language with council, followed by consideration
of the ordinance at two separate regular city council meetings. The first and second
readings of the ordinance would each require approval by at least (4) council members
and would be subject to community comment as action items on the agenda. If
approved by council at the second reading, the ordinance would take effect 15 days
after publication. There are ways to expedite the process should they be desired.
Recommended disposition:(select one)
Study session discussion
Council action at regular meeting
Written report
Include with another item already planned/scheduled
Meeting with requesting councilmember(s)
Handle offline
Special study session of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 1)
Title: Consider proposed study session topic: St. Louis Park separation ordinance
Page 6
Meeting: Special study session
Meeting date: February 17, 2026
Discussion item: 2
Executive summary
Title: Title VI and Language Access Plan update
Recommended action: There is no action being requested for this item.
Policy consideration: There is no policy consideration for this item. It is being shared with
council for informational purposes.
Summary: In September 2025, the REI division presented the council with plans to update the
Title VI Plan approved in 2022 to be reflective across the city, including a Language Access Plan
(LAP). In November 2025, the city announced a Request for Proposal (RFP) regarding Title VI.
Calyptus Consulting Inc. was hired to conduct a citywide Title VI and language access analysis
including federal nondiscrimination authorities (such as Americans with Disabilities Act, age,
gender, sexual orientation, etc.) in the analysis. The outcome of the analysis will be presented
as a final report recommendation at the end of March 2026. The purpose of the discussion on
Feb. 17, 2026, is to provide the council with an update of the analysis findings thus far.
Financial or budget considerations: None
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to being a leader in racial equity
and inclusion in order to create a more just and inclusive community for all.
Supporting documents: Sept. 15, 2025 Study Session Title VI Program report; Sept. 8, 2025
Study Session Language access plan overview; Dec. 19, 2022 Study Session Approve Title VI Plan
Prepared by: Pa Dao Yang, racial equity and inclusion director
Reviewed by: Cheyenne Brodeen, administrative services director
Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager
Special study session meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 2) Page 2
Title: Title VI and Language Access Plan update
Discussion
Background: In December 2022, the city council approved and adopted the Title VI plan with a
focus on meeting basic transit requirements of Metropolitan Council and Minnesota
Department of Transportation (MnDOT). This work was done in partnership between the racial
equity and inclusion (REI) division and engineering department. For 2025, the focus is to create
a Title VI Plan addressing citywide nondiscrimination authorities in addition to Metropolitan
Council and MnDOT. In April 2025, a group of staff and key leaders met to discuss the city’s
current efforts and future opportunities related to Title VI. Following this meeting, the REI
division presented to council in September 2025 about the purpose of expanding the Title VI
Plan citywide. To support the expansion of a Title VI program, the REI division hired a Title VI
consultant to conduct an analysis and report in November 2025. Since hiring Calyptus, they
have conducted department staff interviews, benchmarking across comparable cities and
across the nation, review and build upon the current Title VI Plan and Language Access Plan,
and create a sustainable approach to Title VI management.
Present considerations: While the council is not making a policy decision or taking action on
this item during this discussion, this information is meant to inform the council on the internal
policy staff is working on to embed a Title VI Plan and Language Access Plan throughout city
programs, projects, services and activities to educate staff and the public on nondiscrimination
laws, how to address discrimination when it occurs, and ensure everyone has the right to access
city services no matter their language ability to build a welcoming and inclusive community.
Calyptus’ analysis consists of conducting a robust review of Title VI elements that affect all
federal fund recipients. These elements include:
• Assurances
• Organization and staff
• Title VI notices and postings
• Complaint procedures; complaint form
• Four Factor Analysis; Language Access/Assistance Plan
• Staff training
• Public Participation
• Data collection and reporting
• Subrecipient and contractor monitoring
• Inclusion of MBE/WBE program
• Compliance/enforcement
• Program review procedures
The mid-progress presentation from Calyptus will share recommended changes to the existing
Title VI Plan:
• List of federal statues, executive orders, and state authorities: Streamline core Title VI
statutory and regulatory authorities with flexibility to adapt to federal changes
• Title VI notice and postings: Have one notice for all programs and identify postings in all
buildings/offices offering services
• Complaint procedures: Develop updated procedure for all complaints
• Language Access Plan: Provided input to the draft city Language Access Plan
Special study session meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 2) Page 3
Title: Title VI and Language Access Plan update
• Assurance requirements: Expand section citing U.S. DOT order 1050.2A, include sample
assurance clause and clarification of executed assurances
• Performance measures: New section establishing qualitative and quantitative measures
to evaluate Title VI effectiveness
• Staff training: Training requirements expanded and formalized to specific onboarding
and periodic refresher training, targeted training based on employee roles and
responsibilities
• Public Participation: Incorporate Community Engagement Guide
• Data collection and reporting: Add data collection and outcome for capital planning,
right of way, contracting, planning, public engagement and citywide services
• Program review: Include periodic reviews for evaluation of policies, language assistance,
complaints, procedures and public participation
The expansion of a Title VI and Language Access Plan aligns directly with the city’s strategic
priority and is a key tool that puts our strategic priority of being a racial equity and inclusion
leader into practice. It allows our city to be intentional and proactive to remove barriers, create
access and build trust internally and externally. When a city is proactive in creating a Title VI
and Language Access Plan, it looks at policies, budget and projects through an equity lens to
prevent discrimination from happening in the first place. Without such a program,
discrimination on race, color, national origin and additional nondiscrimination authorities may
only be addressed after a complaint or go unnoticed.
Next steps: The Title VI staff work group, and human rights commission will review the Title VI
Plan and Language Access Plan recommendations by the consultant to provide input before it is
finalized. A final report of the Title VI Plan and Language Access Plan conducted by the
consultant will be completed and brought back to the council for review and approval.
Meeting: Special study session
Meeting date: February 17, 2026
Discussion item: 3
Executive summary
Title: Neighborhood funding discussion
Recommended action: There is no action being requested, this item is for discussion purposes.
Policy consideration:
1. Does the council support the strategies laid out in this report aimed at:
a. Increasing the number of active neighborhood groups in the city; and
b. Increasing overall program spending so that appropriated funds are fully utilized
2. Are there other changes to the neighborhood program that council would like to see?
Summary: In February 2025, the city implemented updates to the Neighborhood Revitalization
Grant Program, clarifying spending restrictions that prohibit the use of public funds for social
events, entertainment and nonessential meals. These changes were recommended by staff to
align the program with public purpose requirements on public dollars and ensure appropriate
stewardship of city resources after the city received an audit finding for a similar expenditure in
the year prior. In addition, the funding for neighborhoods was also changed to a needs-based
formula to better align the program with city priorities.
One year into implementation, city council members have expressed interest in revisiting these
restrictions. This discussion coincides with the need for a one-year update on program
performance, including participation trends, administrative impacts on neighborhood groups,
and any challenges that have emerged under the revised policy.
In a December 2025 study session, the council indicated a wish to further discuss this program
in early 2026. This report will provide an overview of the program’s first year under the 2025
framework and present potential options for the council’s consideration.
Financial or budget considerations: None at this time.
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to creating opportunities to build
social capital through community engagement.
Supporting documents: Neighborhood Grant Funds Update
Prepared by: Pat Coleman, community engagement coordinator
Reviewed by: Cheyenne Brodeen, administrative services director
Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager
Study session meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 3) Page 2
Title: Neighborhood funding discussion
Discussion
Background: In February 2025, staff presented a comprehensive report to the city council
outlining the structure, utilization and legal framework of the Neighborhood Revitalization
Grant Program. This review was prompted by questions raised about the program’s alignment
with public purpose, its legal authority and its overall effectiveness. The analysis included:
• A history of the program and participation trends: Since the Neighborhood Revitalization
Grant Program began, 32 of the city’s 35 recognized neighborhood organizations have
participated. Most typically, neighborhoods utilized funds for projects/events such as
cleanups, beautification, National Night Out, annual meetings, social gatherings and
communication efforts. Historical participation data also shows that program funds were
used more frequently by neighborhoods with greater socioeconomic stability, indicating
uneven utilization across the city.
• A legal review conducted with the city attorney: Staff worked with the city attorney and city
finance staff in consultation with our external auditor to ensure the Neighborhood
Revitalization Grant Program complies with Minnesota’s public purpose doctrine, which
requires all public spending to clearly benefit the community as a whole, rather than an
individual, and relate to legitimate government functions. Staff also requested guidance
from the State Attorney General and were directed back to work with our attorney. Because
state law does not explicitly authorize funding neighborhood groups, each expense must be
evaluated to confirm it serves a public purpose and does not primarily benefit private
individuals. During the 2024 grant cycle, this review resulted in tightening the list of eligible
expenses, and neighborhoods adjusted their requests accordingly. The city attorney and
finance director agree that the revised 2024 eligibility criteria remain appropriate going
forward, though some gray areas will continue to require case-by-case review with staff
support.
• An evaluation of the program through an inclusion and equity lens: Staff conducted a racial
equity and inclusion (REI) analysis, working with the Human Rights Commission and staff
connected to the neighborhood program, to evaluate how the grant program impacts
different communities. Using historical program data and citywide demographics, the
review found that higher income neighborhoods had been benefiting more from available
funds.
o The analysis led to three key recommendations to strengthen equity in the program:
Continue collecting and reviewing data to guide improvements
Identify changes to make the grant process more inclusive and accessible
Explore more equitable methods for distributing funds across neighborhoods
Following this review, staff and the city attorney recommended that the council formally
authorize the Neighborhood Revitalization Grant Program to ensure its continued operation.
Staff also prepared three potential funding structures for council consideration, which
ultimately led to the council authorizing the Neighborhood Revitalization Grant Program and
directed staff to implement a needs-based funding model rather than a competitive grant
structure.
Study session meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 3) Page 3
Title: Neighborhood funding discussion
Under this council-approved approach:
• Funding is allocated using a formula based on neighborhood population, median income
and median property values.
• Neighborhoods are placed into one of three tiers, receiving approximately $1,900 (Tier
1), $1,400 (Tier 2), or $1,000 (Tier 3) annually.
• Every organized neighborhood is guaranteed a minimum of $1,000 in annual support.
Staff also implemented several operational improvements to strengthen the program. These
include establishing annual neighborhood registration, reducing upfront costs for volunteers,
simplifying the application process, allowing year‑round funding requests, and focusing more
intentionally on building a connected, collaborative neighborhood network.
With these changes in place and one full grant cycle completed, staff are prepared to update
the council on the program’s current status.
Present considerations:
The 2025 program year has concluded, and the following provides a snapshot of program
activity. It is important to note that the 2025 cycle operated on a shortened nine-month
timeline due to the timing of the council’s discussion on the neighborhood funding program.
Staff understood the council’s goals for this program to be:
• Increasing participation in parts of the city that have not historically engaged, and
• Increasing overall program spending so that appropriated funds are fully utilized
Funding structure performance
The first year of the needs-based funding model offered a clearer picture of how
neighborhoods are engaging with the program. Of the 12 officially organized neighborhoods,
participation varied across tiers, with all of the activity occurring in Tier 2 and Tier 3 areas.
While overall spending was modest, the rate of funds approved vs. spent reflects long-standing
participation patterns. We refer to this rate as program utilization in the discussion below.
Program totals
• Total funds spent: $6,349.49
• Overall utilization rate of funds: 43%
• Event/project submissions received: 30
• Events/project submissions approved: 18
• Reimbursements processed: 18
• Estimated residents engaged: ~1,000
Context for utilization (funds approved for expenditure vs. funds expended)
Although total program participation and spending was lower than anticipated, the 43%
utilization rate is well within the program’s historical range. Over the past several years,
utilization has averaged about 45%, with annual rates fluctuating between 36% and 54%. This
consistency suggests that the 2025 cycle aligns with long-term patterns rather than indicating a
decline in program effectiveness. In comparison to prior years, a snapshot follows to show the
program utilization rates over the last several program years:
Study session meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 3) Page 4
Title: Neighborhood funding discussion
How funds were spent
Eligible events and projects funded through the program in 2025 fell into the following
categories:
• Annual neighborhood meetings: 22.2%
• National Night Out events: 27.8%
• Community cleanups and beautification: 16.7%
• History and equity events: 0%
• Health and wellness activities: 0%
• Annual neighborhood-wide events with a city/government connection: 16.7%
• Communication and outreach materials: 22.2%
Food related spending
Neighborhood organizations raised concerns about food restrictions and how they affect event
planning. In response, staff clarified that food remains an eligible expense as long as it aligns
with reimbursement practices and public purpose requirements. Neighborhood-wide events
with a city/government connection, community cleanups and beautification, National Night Out
events, and annual neighborhood meetings are all examples of situations where food can be
considered as an eligible expense.
All event/project submissions that included a request to fund food were able to be
accommodated. Approximately 44% of all reimbursed events in 2025 included purchases of
food. Eligible food expenses were primarily associated with:
• Annual meetings
• Cleanup events
• National Night Out activities
City-sponsored food for events or activities that are primarily social in nature fall outside of
legal and audit recommendations; when requests like these came in staff worked with
neighborhood representatives to adapt the request to fit within guidelines.
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2019
Neighborood Grant Program Utilization %
Study session meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 3) Page 5
Title: Neighborhood funding discussion
Operational program components
Staff will provide updates on each operational component introduced in 2025:
Annual neighborhood registration and project/event application process
Changes made to simplify the registration and application process significantly improved the
resident experience with the program.
• Average time to complete a project/event submission: ~11 minutes
• Average time to complete the neighborhood registration form: ~21 minutes
• Estimated time to complete the previous (2024) application: ~450 minutes
These estimates reflect the total time applicants reported spending on the full process—
including gathering required documents, completing eligibility steps, drafting project
descriptions and submitting the application—highlighting the administrative burden that many
neighborhood volunteers experienced under the prior system prior to 2025.
These improvements not only reduced the burden on residents but also allowed staff to
support neighborhoods more effectively. With applications spread throughout the year rather
than concentrated at the beginning, staff were able to work with neighborhoods on an
event-by-event basis, ensuring each project received appropriate attention and guidance.
Simplifying the application process
The streamlined application process resulted in several positive outcomes:
• Reduced application length and complexity
• Increased neighborhood satisfaction with the revised process
• More manageable administrative workload for staff
• Fewer—but still present—barriers for applicants, particularly around understanding
eligibility and reimbursement requirements
Reducing up-front costs for volunteers
Throughout the 2025 program year, staff were able to directly pay vendors on behalf of
neighborhood organizations in several instances, reducing the financial burden on volunteers.
Examples included:
• Direct payment to performers for neighborhood events
• Direct payment to vendors producing neighborhood signage
While this approach is not feasible in all situations, staff continue to explore opportunities to
minimize up-front costs to residents whenever possible.
Strengthening the neighborhood network
Two Neighborhood Network meetings—held in summer and winter—brought together block
captains, neighborhood leaders, and city council members for structured discussion,
collaborative activities, and open dialogue aimed at strengthening relationships and improving
neighborhood-level work.
Meetings included:
• Welcomes and introductions
• A review of the purpose and goals of the Neighborhood Network
Study session meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 3) Page 6
Title: Neighborhood funding discussion
• Relevant city updates
• A “Community Conversations” session with the Police Advisory Commission focused on
safety, trust, and partnership
• Interactive reflection activities where participants shared successes, challenges and
goals
A substantial portion of both meetings focused on the changes made to the Neighborhood
Revitalization Grant Program. Participants discussed what is working well, where barriers
remain, and how the program can better support neighborhood-led engagement.
Conversations were rooted in a shared desire to strengthen the program’s accessibility and
impact.
One activity in the most recent meeting invited attendees to reflect on the past year and
identify priorities for the year ahead. Themes included:
Challenges
• Limited volunteer capacity and difficulty finding co-organizers
• Event logistics and rising costs
• Difficulty reaching all households with event information
• Confusion around reimbursement rules and timelines
• Limited ability to host annual gatherings due to funding restrictions
• Desire to better engage multifamily buildings and re-energize participation
Successes
• Strong engagement at National Night Out
• Launching or re-establishing neighborhood associations
• First-time events with strong attendance
• Long-time volunteers providing continuity
• Creative engagement strategies such as interest-based groups
• Use of city-provided history and equity programming materials
Goals for Next Year
• Strengthening leadership and creating volunteer succession plans
• Expanding outreach and communication tools
• Hosting more events, including four or more in 2026
• Increasing engagement in multifamily buildings
• Supporting non-organized neighborhoods in becoming active
• Functioning more fully as neighborhood associations
This feedback is essential for understanding how to best support neighborhood leaders and
refine the program moving forward as staff work to achieve the understood goals set by city
council.
Study session meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 3) Page 7
Title: Neighborhood funding discussion
Future program priorities
Staff will continue to assess and refine the Neighborhood Revitalization Grant Program to
ensure it remains equitable, accessible, and responsive to community needs. Several areas of
focus have emerged for the upcoming year.
Increasing engagement in historically unengaged neighborhoods
Although a few new neighborhoods registered in 2025—such as Bronx Park and Sorenson (both
Tier 2)—no Tier 1 neighborhoods participated in the program. Increasing engagement among
historically unengaged neighborhoods remains a priority.
To support this goal, staff plan to:
• Partner internally with city departments and externally with community organizations to
identify potential neighborhood leaders who might have a stronger interest to organize
currently unorganized areas, such as block captains.
• Leverage the networks of city council members and their connections with residents.
This approach has been effective—last year, two warm handoffs from council members
directly led to two neighborhoods reengaging with the program.
• Leverage existing city events and volunteer opportunities to raise awareness about the
program.
• Introduce a mentorship model that pairs established neighborhood leaders with
emerging or re-forming neighborhood groups (a suggestion raised at one of the
neighborhood network meetings).
• Provide additional support to neighborhoods that express interest but need more
guidance to organize effectively.
Increasing overall program spending so that appropriated funds are fully utilized
Staff have also explored additional opportunities to ensure that unclaimed program funds are
fully utilized. These funds could be allocated to support activities such as:
• Supporting neighborhoods to better understand and respond to the local impacts of
federal enforcement actions. This may include trainings on residents’ rights, workshops
on community preparedness and communication strategies, and outreach efforts that
help neighborhood leaders share accurate information and connect residents with
trusted resources. These activities would strengthen neighborhood capacity to support
residents during periods of heightened federal enforcement activity.
• Additional training and capacity-building for neighborhood leaders, including workshops
and development opportunities that equip volunteers with skills they can bring back to
their communities that they seek out on their own.
• Interpretation and translation support to help neighborhoods reach multilingual
residents and expand inclusive participation.
These strategies aim to build leadership capacity, reduce barriers to participation, and ensure
all neighborhoods—especially those with higher needs—have opportunities to engage.
Strengthening the neighborhood network
Staff also plan to continue strengthening the neighborhood network as an inclusive, welcoming
space for both new and experienced leaders. While the network has been valuable for
Study session meeting of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 3) Page 8
Title: Neighborhood funding discussion
connection and collaboration, misunderstandings about program rules can create tension or
discourage participation.
A key focus will be addressing misconceptions, including:
• The belief that food is not an allowable expense, despite 44% of reimbursed events
including food
• The perception that the updated funding structure limits neighborhood engagement or
prevents community building activities
• Concerns that the city is unwilling to support neighborhood-led events
Clarifying these issues is essential. Staff remain committed to supporting neighborhood
engagement while ensuring the program aligns with public purpose and responsible
stewardship of taxpayer dollars. Strengthening communication within the network will help
rebuild trust, reduce confusion and create a more inclusive environment where all participants
feel welcome.
Next steps:
Staff will incorporate the direction provided by the council and implement the necessary
program adjustments, ensuring updated information and guidance are available when the 2026
Neighborhood Revitalization Grant Program launches at the annual training on March 5, 2026.
Requested 2025 Awarded 2025 Spent 2025 Utilization Rate Requested 2024 Awarded 2024 Spent 2024 Utlization Rate
$ 1,418.05 $ 1,400.00 $ 511.40 37%$ 3,000.00 $ 2,998.00 $ 1,249.94 42%
$ 750.00 $ 750.00 $ 375.75 50%
$ 670.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 379.63 27%
$ 1,500.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 1,400.00 100%$ 1,650.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 1,242.77 83%
$ 1,060.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 822.94 59%$ 2,700.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 732.05 37%
$ 1,150.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 500.00 50%
$ 850.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 972.58 97%$ 2,805.00 $ 2,280.00 $ 815.54 36%
$ 150.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 150.00 11%$ 3,000.00 $ 2,800.00 $ 14.00 1%
$ 300.00 $ 1,000.00 0%$ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 676.88 23%
$ 1,950.00 $ 1,450.00 $ 618.56 43%
$ 200.00 $ 200.00 $ -0%
$ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 210.54 21%$ 3,000.00 $ 2,900.00 $ 1,855.27 64%
$ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 100%$ 2,900.00 $ 2,400.00 $ 1,502.42 63%
$ 2,165.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 1,398.28 93%
$ 700.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 351.40 25%$ 1,560.00 $ 1,560.00 $ 1,093.00 70%
$ 51.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 51.00 4%
$ 3,000.00 $ 2,500.00 0%
Amhurst
Aquila
Birchwood
Blackstone
Bronx Park
Brooklawns
Brookside
Browndale
Cedar Manor
Cedarhurst
Cobblecrest
Creekside
Crestview
Eliot
Eliot View
Elmwood
Fern Hill
Kilmer Pond
Lake Forest
Lenox
Meadowbrook
Minikahda Oaks
Minikahda Vista
Minnehaha
Pennsylvania Park
Oak Hill
Shelard Park
Sorenson
South Oak Hill
Texa Tonka
Triangle
Westdale
Westwood Hills
Willow Park
Wolfe Park
Grand Total $ 9,849.05 $ 14,800.00 $ 6,349.49 43%$ 31,680.00 $ 27,838.00 $ 11,574.46 42%
Special study session of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 3)
Title: Neighborhood funding discussion
Page 9
Amhurst
Aquila
Birchwood
Blackstone
Bronx Park
Brooklawns
Brookside
Browndale
Cedar Manor
Cedarhurst
Cobblecrest
Creekside
Crestview
Eliot
Eliot View
Elmwood
Fern Hill
Kilmer Pond
Lake Forest
Lenox
Meadowbrook
Minikahda Oaks
Minikahda Vista
Minnehaha
Pennsylvania Park
Oak Hill
Shelard Park
Sorenson
South Oak Hill
Texa Tonka
Triangle
Westdale
Westwood Hills
Willow Park
Wolfe Park
Grand Total
Requested 2023 Awarded 2023 Spent 2023 Utilization Rate Requested 2022 Awarded 2022 Spent 2022 Utilization Rate
$ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 2,239.11 75%$ 2,900.00 $ 2,900.00 $ 2,193.66 76%
$ 1,620.00 $ 1,620.00 $ 412.00 25%$ 2,350.00 $ 2,350.00 $ 407.00 17%
$ 1,700.00
$ 1,500.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 1,122.43 80%$ 1,510.00 $ 1,700.00 $ 606.00 36%
$ 1,975.00 $ 1,975.00 $ 345.00 17%$ 1,925.00 $ 1,510.00 $ 407.00 27%
$ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 1,591.00 53%$ 2,900.00 $ 2,162.00
$ 3,000.00 $ 2,525.00 $ 300.00 12%$ 2,950.00 $ 660.00
$ 1,900.00 $ 1,900.00 $ 76.00 4%
$ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 171.28 6%$ 2,900.00 $ 2,900.00 $ 1,210.46 42%
$ 1,205.00 $ 1,205.00 $ -0%
$ 1,650.00 $ 1,650.00 $ 254.00 15%
$ 737.00 $ 2,900.00 $ 2,900.00 $ 1,892.00 65%
$ 1,487.62 $ 1,487.62 $ 978.00 66%$ 181.00
$ 3,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 1,254.48 63%$ 1,100.00 $ 1,100.00 $ 97.00 9%
$ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 2,079.00 83%$ 2,950.00 $ 2,950.00 $ 637.00 22%
$ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 2,604.05 87%$ 2,225.00 $ 2,225.00 $ 787.00 35%
$ 2,800.00 $ 2,800.00 $ 743.00 27%$ 2,400.00 $ 2,400.00 $ 1,176.00 49%
$ 412.00 $ 2,400.00 $ 2,400.00 $ 407.00 17%
$ 2,900.00 $ 2,900.00 $ 365.00 13%
$ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 1,872.00 62%$ 2,400.00 $ 2,400.00 $ 2,202.00 92%
$ 2,694.26 $ 2,695.00 $ 587.00 22%$ 1,700.00 $ 1,700.00 0%
$ 35,576.88 $ 34,002.62 $ 17,447.35 51%$ 44,865.00 $ 37,090.00 $ 15,720.12 42%
Special study session of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 3)
Title: Neighborhood funding discussion
Page 10
Amhurst
Aquila
Birchwood
Blackstone
Bronx Park
Brooklawns
Brookside
Browndale
Cedar Manor
Cedarhurst
Cobblecrest
Creekside
Crestview
Eliot
Eliot View
Elmwood
Fern Hill
Kilmer Pond
Lake Forest
Lenox
Meadowbrook
Minikahda Oaks
Minikahda Vista
Minnehaha
Pennsylvania Park
Oak Hill
Shelard Park
Sorenson
South Oak Hill
Texa Tonka
Triangle
Westdale
Westwood Hills
Willow Park
Wolfe Park
Grand Total
Requested 2021 Awarded 2021 Spent 2021 Utilization Rate Requested 2019 Awarded 2019 Spent 2019 Utilization Rate
$ 1,650.00 $ 1,650.00 0%$ 1,100.00 $ 1,100.00 $ 1,886.69 172%
$ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 1,630.00 54%$ 2,950.00 $ 2,950.00 $ 2,759.82 94%
$ 2,010.00 $ 2,010.00 $ 364.00 18%$ 2,580.00 $ 2,580.00 $ 1,619.35 63%
$ 1,600.00 $ 1,600.00 0%$ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 953.23 38%
$ 1,580.00 $ 1,580.00 $ 1,210.00 77%$ 1,020.00 $ 1,020.00 $ 596.03 58%
$ 2,225.00 $ 2,225.00 $ 1,173.00 53%$ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 674.06 27%
$ 2,950.00 $ 2,950.00 $ 912.00 31%$ 2,950.00 $ 2,950.00 $ 3,175.20 108%
$ 2,750.00 $ 2,750.00 $ 1,268.00 46%$ 2,950.00 $ 2,950.00 $ 1,028.02 35%
$ 1,750.00 $ 1,750.00 $ 166.00 9%$ 1,750.00 $ 1,750.00 $ 79.12 5%
$ 2,700.00 $ 2,700.00 $ 1,449.00 54%$ 2,035.00 $ 2,035.00 $ 391.21 19%
$ 1,025.00 $ 1,025.00 $ 149.00 15%$ 1,025.00 $ 1,025.00 $ 627.34 61%
$ 1,650.00 $ 1,650.00 $ 112.00 7%$ 1,400.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 505.00 36%
$ 2,950.00 $ 2,950.00 $ 1,260.00 43%$ 2,950.00 $ 2,950.00 $ 1,199.16 41%
$ 1,040.00 $ 1,040.00 0%$ 935.00 $ 935.00 $ 909.00 97%
$ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 354.00 35%$ 1,390.00 $ 1,390.00 $ 822.92 59%
$ 2,200.00 $ 2,200.00 $ 334.00 15%$ 2,300.00 $ 2,300.00 $ 211.73 9%
$ 2,225.00 $ 2,225.00 $ 133.00 6%$ 1,725.00 $ 1,725.00 $ 1,484.73 86%
$ 2,450.00 $ 2,450.00 $ 2,219.00 91%$ 2,450.00 $ 2,450.00 $ 1,669.45 68%
$ 2,450.00 $ 2,450.00 $ 639.00 26%$ 2,450.00 $ 2,450.00 $ 1,031.42 42%
$ 525.00 $ 525.00 0%$ 1,275.00 $ 1,275.00 $ 310.00 24%
$ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 0%$ 2,450.00 $ 2,450.00 $ 878.98 36%
$ 2,250.00 $ 2,250.00 $ 2,548.00 113%$ 2,030.00 $ 2,030.00 $ 1,869.31 92%
$ 1,850.00 $ 1,850.00 $ 533.00 29%$ 2,450.00 $ 2,450.00 $ 902.58 37%
$ 46,330.00 $ 46,330.00 $ 16,453.00 36%$ 47,165.00 $ 47,165.00 $ 25,584.35 54%
Special study session of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 3)
Title: Neighborhood funding discussion
Page 11
Meeting: Special study session
Meeting date: February 17, 2026
Written report: 4
Executive summary
Title: Development update Q1 2026
Recommended action: None. The attached report summarizes the status of major
development projects occurring in St. Louis Park.
Policy consideration: Not applicable. Contact staff with any questions.
Summary: The attached report is meant to keep the EDA/city council informed on a quarterly
basis as to the metrics, construction status, and tentative schedule of major development
projects in the city. For clarity:
• Proposed developments: are those that are working through the planning entitlement
process such as platting, PUDs, variances, and have not yet been approved.
• Approved developments: are those whose planning applications have been approved
by the city council and have not yet commenced construction (but whose financial
assistance agreements may or may not yet have been approved).
• Under construction: are those that just started or are actively being constructed.
• Completed developments: are those that have received their final certificates of
occupancy.
More detailed information can be found on the interactive development dashboard on the
city’s website. The dashboard provides project metrics for all major developments or additions
that have been approved, under construction, or completed within the city since 2010. The
dashboard includes website links, market rate and affordable unit counts by bedroom size,
parking information, bike facilities, electric vehicle charging stations and more.
Additionally, developments receiving financial assistance from the EDA/city are required to
track Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) goals related to business enterprises and workforce
hiring goals. The current goal status for projects under construction and for recently completed
developments is also included in the update.
Financial or budget considerations: Development activity affects the city’s total tax capacity as
reflected in the city’s annual budget and long-range financial plan. It also plays a significant role
in the retention of the city’s AAA bond rating.
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of
housing and neighborhood oriented development.
Supporting documents: Major developments in St. Louis Park, DEI report, Development
gameboard graphic
Prepared by: Dean Porter-Nelson, redevelopment administrator
Reviewed by: Jennifer Monson, economic development manager
Karen Barton, community development director
Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager
Special study session of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 4) Page 2
Title: Development update Q1 2026
Major Developments in St. Louis Park
1st Quarter 2026
Multifamily housing development summary Total Market rate Affordable
Proposed units 265 207 58
Approved units 207 199 8
Units under construction 602 475 127
Recently completed units (last two years) 624 316 308
All units* 1,698 1,197 501
Total Development Costs (TDC)** $492.3 million
*Cumulative unit totals include projects for the last two years only (early 2024 – early 2026).
2023 completions were removed from this report, resulting in lower overall totals for this report.
**Total estimated TDC of all projects. Projects with unknown TDC excluded; actual totals are higher.
For additional information please see Development Projects on the city’s web site.
Proposed developments
Project, location &
developer Project Description Tentative
Schedule
Wooddale Station
Redevelopment
5802 - 5950
36th Street W
Sentinel Management
Company
Sentinel Management Company proposes to purchase and
redevelop the EDA-owned lot located at 5950 36th St. W., as
well as the neighboring Standal property, into a mixed-use,
mixed-income transit-oriented development. Sentinel
proposes a five and six-story building with approximately 265
residential units (of which 21%, or 58 units, would be
restricted to affordable rent levels), 8,000-10,500 square feet
of ground floor commercial space and a public plaza. The
project would meet the city’s green building policy, exceed
the inclusionary housing policy, and adhere to the city’s
diversity, equity and inclusion policy.
Estimated total development cost: TBD.
EDA staff are
working with
Sentinel
Management on a
preliminary
development
agreement for EDA
consideration on
or before March 2,
2026.
Construction
commencement
TBD.
Special study session of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 4) Page 3
Title: Development update Q1 2026
Proposed developments
Project, location &
developer Project Description Tentative
Schedule
Shops at West End
Office Development
The owner of the Shops at West End, Hempel Real Estate, is
exploring the possibility of redeveloping a vacant corner of
the Shops to have ground floor commercial, with four to six
stories of office space above.
Estimated total development cost: TBD.
An AUAR update
was approved by
the city council on
Oct. 6, 2025.
Construction
commencement is
TBD.
Approved developments
Project, location &
developer Project Description Tentative
Schedule
Parkway on 5
5430 Minnetonka
Blvd.
Sela Group &
Affiliates
Development of a 33-unit, three-story apartment building with
a mix of underground and surface parking at the northwest
corner of Minnetonka Blvd. and Highway 100. The project
includes a public trail to the east of the site within the
Minnesota Department of Transportation's right-of-way.
Estimated total development cost: TBD
The city council
approved the
requested
application on
Feb. 2, 2026.
Construction
commencement is
TBD.
Minnetonka Blvd
redevelopment
5707 – 5639
Minnetonka Blvd.
GMHC & Homes
Within Reach
Affordable Housing
Land Trust
Construction of four twin homes (eight-units), providing eight
permanently affordable homeownership opportunities on four
vacant EDA-owned lots.
Estimated total development cost: $8 million
Construction
commencement
anticipated Q2
2026. Developer’s
financial
assistance
application will be
discussed at a
March 9, 2026
study session.
Special study session of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 4) Page 4
Title: Development update Q1 2026
Approved developments
Project, location &
developer Project Description Tentative
Schedule
Knollwood Chipotle
Lindsay Knollwood 2,
LLC
Construction of a Chipotle restaurant at the northwest corner
of Highway 7 and Aquila Avenue South, with a drive-thru lane
for pick up orders only.
Estimated total development cost: TBD
The project
required a
conditional use
permit which was
approved on Oct.
6, 2025.
Construction
commencement is
TBD.
Park Place East
5775 Wayzata Blvd.
GW Properties
Proposed is the construction of two retail buildings in the
southeast corner of the parking lot at 5775 Wayzata Blvd. The
new buildings will contain four fast-casual restaurants.
Estimated total development cost: TBD
Planning
entitlements
approved in
December 2023
and June 2024.
Building permits
are submitted and
construction
commencement is
TBD.
Special study session of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 4) Page 5
Title: Development update Q1 2026
Approved developments
Project, location &
developer Project Description Tentative
Schedule
2625 Louisiana
Avenue South
2625 Louisiana Ave. S.
Web Development
LLC
Largely vacant parcel adjacent to North Cedar Lake Regional
Trail to be redeveloped with a 57-unit, four-story, mixed-use
market-rate building with approximately 4,000 square feet of
ground floor commercial space along with underground and
surface parking. Project includes a public path connecting
Louisiana Avenue to the Regional Trail.
Estimated total development cost: TBD.
Planning
entitlements
approved 2022
and reapproved
2024.
Construction
commencement
TBD.
Achromatic 6013
6013 and 6019 Cedar
Lake Rd.
Joshua Aaron
Proposed is the redevelopment of two single-family homes and
the construction of a 36 unit, three-story building with one
level of below grade parking.
Estimated total construction costs: TBD.
Planning
entitlements
approved
March 2024
Construction
commencement
TBD.
Special study session of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 4) Page 6
Title: Development update Q1 2026
Approved developments
Project, location &
developer Project Description Tentative
Schedule
Parkway Residences
W 31st St. between
Inglewood Ave. &
Glenhurst Ave.
Sela Group &
Affiliates
Multi-phase redevelopment includes four, multi-family
buildings with 211 units. The affordable housing includes 24
rehabilitated units made available to households earning up to
50% of area median income (AMI), and six new units made
available to households earning up to 60% AMI.
Phase III: Eleven-story, 73-unit apartment building.
Estimated development cost: $36.2 million.
Estimated total development cost (all phases): $91.4 million.
EDA approved an
extension to the
development
contract in
February 2024,
allowing for
additional time to
commence on
Phase III.
Phase III
commencement is
TBD.
Special study session of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 4) Page 7
Title: Development update Q1 2026
Under construction
Project, location &
developer Project Description Tentative
Schedule
Terasă
5401 Gamble Drive
Hempel Real Estate
Redevelopment of the northwest office tower within the
West End Office Towers complex, and construction of up to a
six story, 222-unit mixed-use building with approximately
20,000 square feet of commercial space, potentially including
a grocer, restaurant, and coffee shop. Development will
include affordable housing units (20% of total), made
available to households earning up to 50% of area median
income (AMI).
Estimated total development cost: $93.7 million.
EDA approved a
redevelopment
contract on Feb. 18,
2025. The developer
needed additional
time to raise debt
and equity to start
the project.
The developer
picked up the
building permit for
the project on Jan.
31, 2026 and will
begin construction
soon; construction
completion
anticipated Q3
2028.
Beltline Blvd Station
Site
SE quadrant of CSAH
25 & Beltline Blvd.
Sherman Associates
Major mixed-use, mixed income, transit-oriented,
multi-phase development adjacent to
SWLRT Beltline Blvd. Station.
Building 1 includes:
• Seven-story mixed-use building with six levels of
market rate housing (152 units) and 20,000 square
feet of neighborhood commercial space.
• A 592-stall parking ramp, which will include 268 park
& ride stalls, 326 residential stalls and approximately
1,850 square feet of commercial space.
• Estimated development cost: $55.7 million.
Planning
applications
approved April 18,
2022.
Financial assistance
agreements
approved June 20,
2022 and amended
in 2023 & 2025.
Anticipated
construction
schedule:
Dewatering,
underground
utilities, and grading
are complete
Special study session of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 4) Page 8
Title: Development update Q1 2026
• Estimated development cost of public ramp: $11.1
million.
Building 2 includes:
• Four-story all affordable apartment building with 82
units, 39 units will be available to households earning
up to 60% of Area Median Income (AMI), 23 units will
be available to households earning up to 50% AMI,
and 20 units will be available to households earning
up to 30% AMI. The project includes twenty-two three
bedroom units, and 44 units two bedrooms units
• Estimated development cost: $28.4 million.
Building 3 includes:
• Five-story market rate apartment building with 146
units.
• Estimated development cost: $53.5 million.
• Altogether, the multi-phase redevelopment will have
380 apartment units of which 82 (21%) would be
affordable.
Estimated total development cost: $148.7 million.
Footings and
foundations for
Building 1, Building
3 and ramp – in
progress
Building 2 permit is
ready for pickup;
developer will
commence
construction
imminently.
Construction
completion
anticipated by Q1
2027.
Special study session of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 4) Page 9
Title: Development update Q1 2026
Recently completed developments
Project, location &
developer Project Description Tentative
Schedule
Union Park Flats
3700 Alabama Ave. &
6027 37th St. W.
PPL (Project for Pride in
Living)
Redevelopment of the north portion of the Union
Congregational Church property with a three story, 60-unit
affordable apartment building on the north half of the
property. All unit rents have limits ranging between 30%-60%
of area median income (AMI). Union Congregational Church
plans to remain on the south portion of the property.
Estimated total development cost: $28.6 million.
Completed
December 2024.
Mera
(formerly 9920
Wayzata)
9808 & 9920 Wayzata
Blvd.
Bigos Management
Redevelopment of former Santorini’s restaurant property at
northwest quadrant of I-394 & US 169.
Six-story, 233-unit, mixed income apartment building with
20% (47) of the units available to households earning up to
50% of area median income (AMI).
Estimated total development cost: $68.6 million.
Completed
August 2024.
Special study session of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 4) Page 10
Title: Development update Q1 2026
Recently completed developments
Project, location &
developer Project Description Tentative
Schedule
Zelia on Seven
(formerly Via Sol)
SE quadrant Hwy. 7 &
Wooddale Ave.
5855 Hwy. 7
Originally developed by
PLACE
now owned by Bigos
Management
Mixed-income, transit-oriented development including a five-
story, 217-unit apartment building (130 market rate units,
22 units affordable to households earning up to 50% of area
median income (AMI) and 65 units affordable to households
earning up to 60% AMI, solar panels installed spring 2025
(producing 220AC kW, 275 DC kW and 300,000 KwH total
generation) and one-acre urban forest.
Estimated total development cost: $88.4 million.
Completed
May 2024.
Arbor Court
3755 Wooddale Ave. S.
Real Estate Equities LLC
Redevelopment of former Aldersgate Church property
adjacent to Burlington Coat/Micro Center and Highway 100.
All affordable housing development includes 114-units, with
205 parking stalls, of which 117 stalls are underground.
• 5 units affordable to households earning up to 30% AMI
• 5 units affordable to households earning up to 50% AMI
• 104 units affordable to households earning up to 60%
AMI
Estimated total development cost $30.1 million.
Completed
March 2024.
Special study session of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 4) Page 11
Title: Development update Q1 2026
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Hiring Goals
Report – January 1, 2026
Beltline Station Building #1 – Mixed Use Building
Beltline Station #1
QUARTERLY COMPLIANCE SUMMARY ACTUAL GOALS
Total number of business enterprises contracted
in development 30
Percentage of women-owned business enterprises
in development 13.3% 6%
Percentage of BIPOC/AAPI owned business
enterprises in development 0% 13%
Percentage of total development dollars paid to
women-owned business enterprises in
development
4.8% 6%
Percentage of total development dollars paid to
BIPOC/AAPI owned business enterprises in
development
0.0% 13%
Total number of construction workers contracted
in development 73
Percentage of women workforce in development 8.2% 20%
Percentage of BIPOC/AAPI workforce in
development 8.2% 32%
Percentage of total construction hours for women
workforce in development 12.0% 20%
Percentage of total construction hours for
BIPOC/AAPI workforce in development 3.7% 32%
Total number of employees at business
organization 530
Percentage of women employed by business
organization 30.9% 10%
Percentage of BIPOC/AAPI persons employed by
business organization 31.5% 13%
*The BIPOC/AAPI workforce demographic data is self-reported and likely does
not fully capture Hispanic/Latinx individuals.
Special study session of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 4) Page 12
Title: Development update Q1 2026
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Hiring Goals
Report – January 1, 2026
Beltline Station Building #3 – Market Rate Housing
Beltline Station #3
QUARTERLY COMPLIANCE SUMMARY ACTUAL GOALS
Total number of business enterprises contracted
in development 40
Percentage of women-owned business
enterprises in development 10% 6%
Percentage of BIPOC/AAPI owned business
enterprises in development 2.5% 13%
Percentage of total development dollars paid to
women-owned business enterprises in
development
4.8% 6%
Percentage of total development dollars paid to
BIPOC/AAPI owned business enterprises in
development
0.4% 13%
Total number of construction workers
contracted in development 182
Percentage of women workforce in development 2.7% 20%
Percentage of BIPOC/AAPI workforce in
development 8.8% 32%
Percentage of total construction hours for women
workforce in development 3.4% 20%
Percentage of total construction hours for
BIPOC/AAPI workforce in development 9.6% 32%
Total number of employees at business
organization 530
Percentage of women employed by business
organization 30.9% 10%
Percentage of BIPOC/AAPI persons employed by
business organization 31.5% 13%
*The BIPOC/AAPI workforce demographic data is self-reported and likely does
not fully capture Hispanic/Latinx individuals.
Special study session of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 4) Page 13
Title: Development update Q1 2026
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Hiring Goals
Report – January 1, 2026
Beltline Station Sitework – for all buildings and the parking ramp
Beltline Station
Sitework
QUARTERLY COMPLIANCE SUMMARY ACTUAL GOALS
Total number of business enterprises contracted
in development 6
Percentage of women-owned business enterprises
in development 0% 6%
Percentage of BIPOC/AAPI owned business
enterprises in development 0% 13%
Percentage of total development dollars paid to
women-owned business enterprises in
development
0.00% 6%
Percentage of total development dollars paid to
BIPOC/AAPI owned business enterprises in
development
0.00% 13%
Total number of construction workers contracted
in development 152
Percentage of women workforce in development 0.7% 20%
Percentage of BIPOC/AAPI workforce in
development 15.1% 32%
Percentage of total construction hours for women
workforce in development 0.2% 20%
Percentage of total construction hours for
BIPOC/AAPI workforce in development 14.5% 32%
Total number of employees at business
organization 530
Percentage of women employed by business
organization 30.9% 10%
Percentage of BIPOC/AAPI persons employed by
business organization 31.5% 13%
*The BIPOC/AAPI workforce demographic data is self-reported and likely does
not fully capture Hispanic/Latinx individuals.
Beltline Station – all
phases (B1, B2, B3, ramp)
Wooddale Station
Redevelopment
Minnetonka Blvd.
Twin homes
Terasa Development
2625 Louisiana Ave.
Achromatic 6013
Parkway
Residences Phase III
Parkway on 5
Special study session of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 4)
Title: Development update Q1 2026
Page 14
Meeting: Special study session
Meeting date: February 17, 2026
Written report: 5
Executive summary
Title: Advisory commissions communications to city council - workplan updates
Recommended action: Does the city council wish to place the proposed workplan item
additions for the human rights commission and the community technology advisory
commission on an upcoming consent agenda for approval?
Policy consideration: None at this time.
Summary: In winter 2025, the city council approved a communication tool that allows boards
and commissions to communicate directly with the council. This tool can be used for a variety
of purposes, including submitting requests to add new items to existing workplans.
Attached are advisory communication documents from the community technology advisory
commission and the human rights commission. Each commission is notifying the city council of
newly approved workplan items they wish to add to their current workplans as part of their
ongoing efforts.
Financial or budget considerations: Not applicable.
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to creating opportunities to build
social capital through community engagement.
Supporting documents:
Human rights commission advisory communication form and workplan draft
Community technology advisory commission advisory communication form and workplan draft
Prepared by: Pat Coleman, community engagement coordinator
Reviewed by: Cheyenne Brodeen, administrative services director
Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager
1
Advisory communication to council
City Council has provided direction that the primary purpose of advisory boards and commissions is to
assist/advise city council in the policy decision-making process on behalf of the public. Boards and
commissions may also be asked to provide community advice and feedback in a systematic manner.
Please use this form to submit a board or commission-related topic for city council consideration. Note that
use of this advisory communication to council requires a majority vote of a city board or commission prior to
submission.
Decisions on whether to take up an issue will be made by council.
Use the sections below as a guide and omit sections that may be extraneous.
Date:
To:
From:
Subject:
Strategic priority (if applicable):
Approved work plan item? Yes
No
Council request: Review and comment or reply
Review and decide (e.g., new work plan item)
Informational only – no response needed
Action requested:
What is the commission asking Council to do? For non-work plan items, no action will be taken unless Council
chooses to provide direction or otherwise discuss at a future meeting. If requesting a new work plan item, make
explicit.
Special study session of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5)
Title: Advisory commissions communications to city council - workplan updates
Page 2
2
Background:
Explain the exact circumstances of the situation and provide general information about the topic/issue.
Assessment:
Explanation of the Commission's stance on a particular topic/issue, how it supports existing strategic priorities
and how it advances the purpose of boards and commissions. Include information about whether cross-
collaboration with other boards or commissions is recommended. If action from the council is requested,
provide the justification.
Recommendation:
Recommendations should be included for “review and decide” initiatives. Include clear explanation of
recommendation(s). This section can include a bulleted list of each individual recommendation, etc. Staff will
provide their recommendations on the staff report.
Special study session of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5)
Title: Advisory commissions communications to city council - workplan updates
Page 3
Board and Commission
Annual work plan
c ouncil: February 17, 2025
1
Human Rights Commission Workplan
1
Initiative name: Human Rights Award
Initiative type:
Staff support (review project,
policy or program and provide
feedback)
Independent research project
Gather community feedback
Lead community event
Initiative origin:
Applicant-initiated
Staff-initiated
Commission-initiated
Council-initiated
Legally required (e.g. response to
Legislative changes or Judicial decisions)?
Yes
No
Commissioner lead(s) name(s):
All members will participate.
If joint commission initiative, list other board or commission:
Is this an established work group?
Yes
No
Initiative description:
Together with city staff, the HRC will lead the Human Rights Award by setting guidelines, sharing information, reviewing entries, and presenting the
award.
Strategic Priority: 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
Deliverable: Research report Summary of community input Other N/A
Target completion date: Ongoing, yearly initiative
This section to be completed by staff:
Council request (if applicable): Review and comment or reply Review and decide Informational only – no response needed
Budget required: Funding for award purchase
Staff support required: Staff liaison, communications department
Liaison comments: Nominations for the 2025 Human Rights Awards opened January 5, 2026 and close February 28, 2026. The
commission will review applications in March of 2026, and present the award to it’s winner in April of 2026.
Special study session of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5)
Title: Advisory commissions communications to city council - workplan updates
Page 4
2
2
Initiative name: Support REI related projects and initiatives
Initiative type:
Staff support (review project,
policy or program and provide
feedback)
Independent research project
Gather community feedback
Lead community event
Initiative origin:
Applicant-initiated
Staff-initiated
Commission-initiated
Council-initiated
Legally required (e.g. response to
Legislative changes or Judicial decisions)?
Yes
No
Commissioner lead(s) name(s):
All members will participate.
If joint commission initiative, list other board or commission:
Is this an established work group?
Yes
No
Initiative description:
The HRC will support city staff as needed by reviewing projects and policies and offering feedback to ensure successful outcomes.
Strategic Priority: 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
Deliverable: Research report Summary of community input Other N/A
Target completion date: Ongoing
This section to be completed by staff:
Council request (if applicable): Review and comment or reply Review and decide Informational only – no response needed
Budget required: None
Staff support required: Communication from staff liaison about opportunities for involvement in various projects and initiatives
Liaison comments: Commissioners have been made aware that there are multiple projects on the horizon where their involvement will be
necessary.
Special study session of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5)
Title: Advisory commissions communications to city council - workplan updates
Page 5
3
3
Initiative name: Golden Valley Pride Festival Partnership
Initiative type:
Staff support (review project,
policy or program and provide
feedback)
Independent research project
Gather community feedback
Lead community event
Initiative origin:
Applicant-initiated
Staff-initiated
Commission-initiated
Council-initiated
Legally required (e.g. response to
Legislative changes or Judicial decisions)?
Yes
No
Commissioner lead(s) name(s):
All members will participate.
If joint commission initiative, list other board or commission:
Is this an established work group?
Yes
No
Initiative description:
In partnership with Golden Valley and the REI division, the HRC will continue to support their ongoing efforts to a successful Pride Event.
Strategic Priority: 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
Deliverable: Research report Summary of community input Other N/A
Target completion date:
This section to be completed by staff:
Council request (if applicable): Review and comment or reply Review and decide Informational only – no response needed
Budget required: None
Staff support required: Communication from staff liaison on what is needed to help execute the event.
Liaison comments: With the REI division as the lead of the partnership, there has been conversation as the planning of the Golden Valley
Pride Festival is on the horizon that will be communicated with HRC members as it moves forward.
Special study session of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5)
Title: Advisory commissions communications to city council - workplan updates
Page 6
4
4
Initiative name: HRC Awareness
Initiative type:
Staff support (review project,
policy or program and provide
feedback)
Independent research project
Gather community feedback
Lead community event
Initiative origin:
Applicant-initiated
Staff-initiated
Commission-initiated
Council-initiated
Legally required (e.g. response to
Legislative changes or Judicial decisions)?
Yes
No
Commissioner lead(s) name(s):
All members will participate
If joint commission initiative, list other board or commission:
Is this an established work group?
Yes
No
Initiative description:
This initiative focuses on strengthening the commission’s visibility and building deeper connections within the community.
Strategic Priority: 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
Deliverable: Research report Summary of community input Other N/A
Target completion date:
This section to be completed by staff:
Council request (if applicable): Review and comment or reply Review and decide Informational only – no response needed
Budget required: None
Staff support required: Communication from staff liaison to share opportunities to spread awareness of the commission.
Liaison comments: Commissioners have been exploring opportunities to spread more awareness about commissions, specifically their
own. There has been discussion around old opportunities to spread awareness and how to transition those into 2026.
Special study session of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5)
Title: Advisory commissions communications to city council - workplan updates
Page 7
5
5
Initiative name:
Initiative type:
Staff support (review project,
policy or program and provide
feedback)
Independent research project
Gather community feedback
Lead community event
Initiative origin:
Applicant-initiated
Staff-initiated
Commission-initiated
Council-initiated
Legally required (e.g. response to
Legislative changes or Judicial decisions)?
Yes
No
Commissioner lead(s) name(s):
If joint commission initiative, list other board or commission:
Is this an established work group?
Yes
No
Initiative description:
Strategic Priority: 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
Deliverable: Research report Summary of community input Other N/A
Target completion date:
This section to be completed by staff:
Council request (if applicable): Review and comment or reply Review and decide Informational only – no response needed
Budget required:
Staff support required:
Liaison comments:
Special study session of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5)
Title: Advisory commissions communications to city council - workplan updates
Page 8
6
Initiative Origin Definitions
Applicant-initiated – Project initiated by 3rd party (statutory boards)
Staff-initiated – Project initiated by staff liaison or other city staff
Commission-initiated – Project initiated by the board or commission
Council-initiated – Project tasked to a board or commission by the city council
Strategic Priorities
1. St. Louis Park is committed to being a leader in racial equity and inclusion in order to create a more just and inclusive community for all.
2. St. Louis Park is committed to continue to lead in environmental stewardship.
3. St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of housing and neighborhood oriented development.
4. St. Louis Park is committed to providing a variety of options for people to make their way around the city comfortably, safely and
reliably.
5. St. Louis Park is committed to creating opportunities to build social capital through community engagement
Modifications
Work plans may be modified, to add or delete items, in one of three ways:
Work plans can be modified by mutual agreement during a joint work session.
If immediate approval is important, the board or commission can work with their staff liaison to present a modified work plan for city
council approval at a council meeting.
The city council can direct a change to the work plan at their discretion.
Special study session of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5)
Title: Advisory commissions communications to city council - workplan updates
Page 9
7
Future ideas
Initiatives that are being considered by the board or commission but not proposed in the annual work plan. Council approval is needed if the
board or commission decides they would like to amend a work plan.
Initiative Comments
Special study session of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5)
Title: Advisory commissions communications to city council - workplan updates
Page 10
1
Advisory communication to council
City Council has provided direction that the primary purpose of advisory boards and commissions is to
assist/advise city council in the policy decision-making process on behalf of the public. Boards and
commissions may also be asked to provide community advice and feedback in a systematic manner.
Please use this form to submit a board or commission-related topic for city council consideration. Note that
use of this advisory communication to council requires a majority vote of a city board or commission prior to
submission.
Decisions on whether to take up an issue will be made by council.
Use the sections below as a guide and omit sections that may be extraneous.
Date:
To:
From:
Subject:
Strategic priority (if applicable):
Approved work plan item? Yes
No
Council request: Review and comment or reply
Review and decide (e.g., new work plan item)
Informational only – no response needed
Action requested:
What is the commission asking Council to do? For non-work plan items, no action will be taken unless Council
chooses to provide direction or otherwise discuss at a future meeting. If requesting a new work plan item, make
explicit.
Special study session of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5)
Title: Advisory commissions communications to city council - workplan updates
Page 11
2
Background:
Explain the exact circumstances of the situation and provide general information about the topic/issue.
Assessment:
Explanation of the Commission's stance on a particular topic/issue, how it supports existing strategic priorities
and how it advances the purpose of boards and commissions. Include information about whether cross-
collaboration with other boards or commissions is recommended. If action from the council is requested,
provide the justification.
Recommendation:
Recommendations should be included for “review and decide” initiatives. Include clear explanation of
recommendation(s). This section can include a bulleted list of each individual recommendation, etc. Staff will
provide their recommendations on the staff report.
Special study session of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5)
Title: Advisory commissions communications to city council - workplan updates
Page 12
Board and Commission
Annual work plan
council: February 17, 2026
1
Communications and Technology Commission Work Plan
1
Initiative name: Support citywide Vision 4.0 process
Initiative type:
Staff support (review project,
policy or program and provide
feedback)
Independent research project
Gather community feedback
Lead community event
Initiative origin:
Applicant-initiated
Staff-initiated
Commission-initiated
Council-initiated
Legally required (e.g. response to
Legislative changes or Judicial decisions)?
Yes
No
Commissioner lead(s) name(s):
None, all will be involved.
If joint commission initiative, list other board or commission:
Is this an established work group?
Yes
No
Initiative description: Support the citywide Vision 4.0 process by participating directly and/or encouraging others to participate, and by
sharing information with other community members about the process.
Strategic Priority: 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
Deliverable: Research report Summary of community input Other N/A
Target completion date: 3Q 2025
This section to be completed by staff:
Council request (if applicable): Review and comment or reply Review and decide Informational only – no response needed
Budget required: None
Staff support required: Communication from staff liaison about opportunities with Vision 4.0
Liaison comments: Plan to keep the commission informed about opportunities to assist with the citywide Vision 4.0 process.
Commission members received information from the community engagement coordinator throughout the Vision 4.0 process,
including invites to participate in surveys and to host community meetings.
Special study session of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5)
Title: Advisory commissions communications to city council - workplan updates
Page 13
2
Commission member Benjamin Straus hosted a community meeting at his apartment complex.
Commission members reviewed the Dec. 8, 2025, Vision 4.0 council report presented to the city council, to inform CTAC
additional workplan goals for 2026.
2
Initiative name: Participate in city website redesign review process
Initiative type:
Staff support (review project,
policy or program and provide
feedback)
Independent research project
Gather community feedback
Lead community event
Initiative origin:
Applicant-initiated
Staff-initiated
Commission-initiated
Council-initiated
Legally required (e.g. response to
Legislative changes or Judicial decisions)?
Yes
No
Commissioner lead(s) name(s):
None, all members or a small group will be involved.
If joint commission initiative, list other board or commission:
Is this an established work group?
Yes
No
Initiative description: While the exact process for the redesign has yet to be determined, we plan to draw on the expertise of the CTAC by
involving members, or a small group of members, in potential user group testing or other review of a draft redesign of the city website.
Strategic Priority: 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
Deliverable: Research report Summary of community input Other N/A
Target completion date: 3Q 2025
This section to be completed by staff:
Council request (if applicable): Review and comment or reply Review and decide Informational only – no response needed
Budget required: None
Staff support required: Staff liaison
Liaison comments: The primary goals of the redesign are to ensure compliance with upcoming ADA requirements, ensure mobile
accessibility and improve search function. CTAC will be asked to focus on these items in its review.
CTAC members Konnor Slaats and Kayla Stautz each participated in one of two user experience workshops Sept. 9 and 11, both
two hours each. Both were provided with recordings of the workshop they didn’t attend, and provided comments on user
feedback, as well as suggested wireframe and design elements.
Special study session of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5)
Title: Advisory commissions communications to city council - workplan updates
Page 14
3
3
Initiative name: Stay informed about pending legislation affecting cable and technology
Initiative type:
Staff support (review project,
policy or program and provide
feedback)
Independent research project
Gather community feedback
Lead community event
Initiative origin:
Applicant-initiated
Staff-initiated
Commission-initiated
Council-initiated
Legally required (e.g. response to
Legislative changes or Judicial decisions)?
Yes
No
Commissioner lead(s) name(s):
None, all will be involved
If joint commission initiative, list other board or commission:
Is this an established work group?
Yes
No
Initiative description: CTAC is asked to stay informed about pending legislation that may affect the city’s cable franchise, or other
technologies vital to the community such as broadband.
Strategic Priority: 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
Deliverable: Research report Summary of community input Other N/A
Target completion date: Ongoing
This section to be completed by staff:
Council request (if applicable): Review and comment or reply Review and decide Informational only – no response needed
Budget required: None
Staff support required: Information and updates from staff liaison
Liaison comments: Staff liaison will stay informed of pending legislation through contact with state and national advocacy organizations,
as well as through the city’s legislative staff and lobbyists. Information affecting cable and technology will be shared with CTAC members.
Special study session of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5)
Title: Advisory commissions communications to city council - workplan updates
Page 15
4
4
Initiative name: Whitepaper – Future of Generative AI for Cities
Initiative type:
Staff support (review project,
policy or program and provide
feedback)
Independent research project
Gather community feedback
Lead community event
Initiative origin:
Applicant-initiated
Staff-initiated
Commission-initiated
Council-initiated
Legally required (e.g. response to
Legislative changes or Judicial decisions)?
Yes
No
Commissioner lead(s) name(s):
Konnor Slaats, Kayla Stautz, Benjamin Straus
If joint commission initiative, list other board or commission:
Is this an established work group?
Yes
No
Initiative description: This is a proposed whitepaper seeking to explore the question: how might cities need to adapt to be generative
artificial intelligence (AI)-compatible in the future? The whitepaper will explore policy adaptations cities, including St. Louis Park, may
need to make in a generative AI-enabled future. Peer cities and use cases for generative AI tech will be explored in areas such as
public works, public-facing chatbots, planning and zoning, external resources and coalitions, and public engagement.
Strategic Priority: 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
Deliverable: Research report Summary of community input Other N/A
Target completion date: Q3 2026
This section to be completed by staff:
Council request (if applicable): Review and comment or reply Review and decide Informational only – no response needed
Special study session of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5)
Title: Advisory commissions communications to city council - workplan updates
Page 16
5
Budget required:
Staff support required:
Liaison comments: CTAC has reviewed the generative AI guidelines generated in November 2024 for city staff, and is aware of the data
assessment project conducted in 2025 to move the city toward the goal of having reliable, organized data to “feed” any future
generative AI project. Data cleanup will continue in 2026.
5
Initiative name: mystlouispark (city customer response management system) assessment
Initiative type:
Staff support (review project,
policy or program and provide
feedback)
Independent research project
Gather community feedback
Lead community event
Initiative origin:
Applicant-initiated
Staff-initiated
Commission-initiated
Council-initiated
Legally required (e.g. response to
Legislative changes or Judicial decisions)?
Yes
No
Commissioner lead(s) name(s):
Rudyard Dyer, Shane Leverenz, Tom Marble (school district staff
liaison)
If joint commission initiative, list other board or commission:
Is this an established work group?
Yes
No
Initiative description: The commission team members will conduct an assessment and review of the current MySLP app. We will
document the current feature set, capabilities, accessibility (language options), and integrations. Research will be conducted on
industry best practices and peer municipality apps to determine if there are any opportunities to expand, further integrate, or modify
the existing MySLP app in any way to provide more or better benefits to residents. We will also examine whether the MySLP app is
even necessary. The end deliverable will be a report outlining the current condition and capabilities of MySLP with recommendations
for any changes, enhancements, or modifications to the platform.
Strategic Priority: 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
Deliverable: Research report Summary of community input Other N/A
Target completion date:
This section to be completed by staff:
Council request (if applicable): Review and comment or reply Review and decide Informational only – no response needed
Special study session of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5)
Title: Advisory commissions communications to city council - workplan updates
Page 17
6
Budget required:
Staff support required:
Liaison comments: City staff are currently evaluating this product for compatibility with other software being used in the city for
tracking work requests internally, in an attempt to eliminate duplicate efforts.
Initiative Origin Definitions
Applicant-initiated – Project initiated by 3rd party (statutory boards)
Staff-initiated – Project initiated by staff liaison or other city staff
Commission-initiated – Project initiated by the board or commission
Council-initiated – Project tasked to a board or commission by the city council
Strategic Priorities
1. St. Louis Park is committed to being a leader in racial equity and inclusion in order to create a more just and inclusive community for all.
2. St. Louis Park is committed to continue to lead in environmental stewardship.
3. St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of housing and neighborhood oriented development.
4. St. Louis Park is committed to providing a variety of options for people to make their way around the city comfortably, safely and
reliably.
5. St. Louis Park is committed to creating opportunities to build social capital through community engagement
Modifications
Work plans may be modified, to add or delete items, in one of three ways:
Work plans can be modified by mutual agreement during a joint work session.
Special study session of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5)
Title: Advisory commissions communications to city council - workplan updates
Page 18
7
If immediate approval is important, the board or commission can work with their staff liaison to present a modified work plan for city
council approval at a council meeting.
The city council can direct a change to the work plan at their discretion.
Future ideas
Initiatives that are being considered by the board or commission but not proposed in the annual work plan. Council approval is needed if the
board or commission decides they would like to amend a work plan.
Initiative Comments
Special study session of February 17, 2026 (Item No. 5)
Title: Advisory commissions communications to city council - workplan updates
Page 19