Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2016/10/17 - ADMIN - Agenda Packets - City Council - Regular
AGENDA OCTOBER 17, 2016 6:15 p.m. SPECIAL STUDY SESSION – Westwood Room Discussion Items 1. 6:15 p.m. Review of Proposed 2017 CIP, LRFMP and Utility Rates 7:25 p.m. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY -- Council Chambers 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes 3a. Economic Development Authority Meeting Minutes September 6, 2016 4. Approval of Agenda 5. Reports 5a. Approval of EDA Disbursements 6. Old Business -- None 7. New Business 7a. Assignment and Subordination Agreement – ACSLP, LLC (TPI Hospitality/AC Hotel by Marriott) Recommended Action: Motion to Adopt Resolution approving the Assignment and Subordination Agreement with ACSLP, LLC (TPI Hospitality) and Johnson Bank relative to the Amended and Restated Contract for Private Redevelopment with Central Park West, LLC. 8. Communications -- None 9. Adjournment 7:30 p.m. CITY COUNCIL MEETING – Council Chambers 1. Call to Order 1a. Pledge of Allegiance 1b. Roll Call 2. Presentations 2a. Recognition of Donations 3. Approval of Minutes 3a. Special Study Session Meeting Minutes September 6, 2016 3b. City Council Meeting Minutes September 6, 2016 3c. Special Study Session Minutes of September 19, 2016 3d. City Council Meeting Minutes September 19, 2016 Meeting of October 17, 2016 City Council Agenda 4. Approval of Agenda and Items on Consent Calendar NOTE: The Consent Calendar lists those items of business which are considered to be routine and/or which need no discussion. Consent items are acted upon by one motion. If discussion is desired by either a Councilmember or a member of the audience, that item may be moved to an appropriate section of the regular agenda for discussion. The items for the Consent Calendar are listed on the last page of the Agenda. Recommended Action: Motion to approve the Agenda as presented and items listed on the Consent Calendar; and to waive reading of all resolutions and ordinances. (Alternatively: Motion to add or remove items from the agenda, or move items from Consent Calendar to regular agenda for discussion.) 5. Boards and Commissions -- None 6. Public Hearings 6a. Hennepin Distilling, LLC dba Copperwing Distillery - On-Sale Cocktail Room and Off- Sale Microdistillery Liquor Licenses Recommended Action: Mayor to open public hearing, take public testimony, and close public hearing. Motion to approve application from Hennepin Distilling, LLC dba Copperwing Distillery, for On-Sale Cocktail Room and Off-Sale Microdistillery Liquor Licenses for the premises located at 6409 Cambridge Street, with a license term through March 1, 2017. 6b. MSA Rehabilitation Project - Texas Avenue- Project No. 4017-1101 Recommended Action: Mayor to open public hearing, take public testimony, and close public hearing. Motion to Adopt Resolution accepting the project report, establishing improvement project No. 4017-1101 for the MSA Rehabilitation Project- Texas Avenue, approving preliminary layout Concept 2 and ordering development of final plans. 6c. Consolidated Public Hearing (1) 2017 Budget & Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 1 and extension of Special Service District through 2026 Recommended Action: Mayor to close public hearing. Motion to Adopt Resolution setting the 2017 Budget & Property Owner Service Charge and approve 10-year extension for Special Service District No. 1 and directing staff to certify the annual service charges to Hennepin County. (2) 2017 Budget & Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 2 Recommended Action: Mayor to close public hearing. Motion to Adopt Resolution setting the 2017 Budget and Property Owner Service Charge for Special Service District No. 2 and directing staff to certify the annual service charges to Hennepin County. (3) 2017 Budget & Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 3 Recommended Action: Mayor to close public hearing. Motion to Adopt Resolution setting the 2017 Budget and Property Owner Service Charge for Special Service District No. 3 and directing staff to certify the annual service charges to Hennepin County. (4) 2017 Budget & Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 4 Recommended Action: Mayor to close public hearing. Motion to Adopt Resolution setting the 2017 Budget and Property Owner Service Charge for Special Service District No. 4 and directing staff to certify the annual service charges to Hennepin County. Meeting of October 17, 2016 City Council Agenda Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. To make arrangements, please call the Administration Department at 952/924-2525 (TDD 952/924-2518) at least 96 hours in advance of meeting. (5) 2017 Budget & Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 5 Recommended Action: Mayor to close public hearing. Motion to Adopt Resolution setting the 2017 Budget and Property Owner Service Charge for Special Service District No. 5 and directing staff to certify the annual service charges to Hennepin County. (6) 2017 Budget & Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 6 Recommended Action: Mayor to close public hearing. Motion to Adopt Resolution setting the 2017 Budget and Property Owner Service Charge for Special Service District No. 6 and directing staff to certify the annual service charges to Hennepin County. 6d. Public Hearing to Consider First Reading of 2017 Fee Ordinance Recommended Action: Mayor to conduct public hearing. Motion to Approve 1st Reading of Ordinance adopting fees for 2017 and set Second Reading for November 7, 2016. 6e. Assessment of Delinquent Charges Recommended Action: Mayor to open the public hearing, solicit comments, and close the public hearing. Motion to Adopt Resolution to assess delinquent water, sewer, storm water, refuse, abating grass/weed cutting, tree removal/injection, false alarm fees and other miscellaneous charges 7. Requests, Petitions, and Communications from the Public – None 8. Resolutions, Ordinances, Motions and Discussion Items 8a. Consultant Contract for Vision Process Recommended Action: Motion to approve the contract with Rebecca Ryan of NEXT Generation Consulting, Inc. for services related to the City upcoming community visioning process. 8b. Conditional Use Permit/Variance – Communication Tower, City of St. Louis Park Recommended Action: The following motions are recommended by the Planning Commission. One motion could be made for both actions. Motion to Adopt Resolution approving the Conditional Use Permit for a 70-foot tall communication tower, with conditions as recommended by staff. Motion to Adopt Resolution approving a 34-foot variance to the required 140-foot setback for the communication tower with conditions as recommended by staff. 8c. 1st Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Related to Fences Recommended Action: Motion to approve the first reading of an Ordinance amending Chapter 36 of the St. Louis Park Code of Ordinances relating to zoning, and to set the second reading for November 7, 2016. 9. Communications – None St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority and regular City Council meetings are carried live on Civic TV cable channel 17 and replays are frequent; check www.parktv.org for the schedule. The meetings are also streamed live on the internet at www.parktv.org, and saved for Video on Demand replays. The agenda is posted on Fridays on the official city bulletin board in the lobby of City Hall and on the text display on Civic TV cable channel 17. The agenda and full packet are available by noon on Friday on the city’s website. Meeting of October 17, 2016 City Council Agenda CONSENT CALENDAR 4a. Authorize the City Manager to execute a Shared Services Agreement with the City of Golden Valley relating to the Central Park West redevelopment. 4b. Adopt Resolution electing not to waive the statutory tort limits for liability insurance. 4c. Adopt Resolution approving acceptance of a monetary donation from the International Society of Arboriculture in an amount not to exceed $2,000 for all related expenses for Jim Vaughan, Natural Resources Coordinator, to attend the 2016 International Society of Arboriculture Leadership Workshop in Champaign, Illinois. 4d. Adopt Resolution approving acceptance of a monetary donation from Athletic Business in an amount not to exceed $2,000 for all related expenses for Jason Eisold, Rec Center Manager, to attend the Athletic Business Conference in Orlando, Florida. 4e. Adopt Resolution authorizing the special assessment for the repair of the sewer service line at 2605 Xylon Avenue South, St. Louis Park, MN P.I.D.07-117-21-42-0013. 4f. Accept for filing City Disbursement Claims for the period of August 27th through October 7, 2016. 4g. Adopt Resolution approving acceptance of a monetary donation from the Estate of Alice Trainer in the amount of $1,200 for improvements to Lamplighter Park via the Operations and Recreation Department and $1,200 to the Fire Department for use at their discretion. 4h. Adopt Resolution setting the 2017 Utility Rates. 4i. Adopt a Resolution authorizing the execution of a grant agreement with Hennepin County for a Moving the Market grant to be used in the Walker/Lake Street area. 4j. Approve the HealthPartners contract for health insurance for 2017 and 2018. 4k. Adopt Resolution accepting work and authorizing final payment in the amount of $7,590.43 for Project 4016-3000 Sanitary Sewer Lining with Michels Corporation, City Contract No. 42-16. 4l. Award bid for Concrete Replacement– Project No. 4017-0003. 4m. Approve a Temporary On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for Minnesota Cycling Center at Aquila Park, 3110 Xylon Avenue So., for November 5, 2016. 4n. Adopt Resolution to approve the application for an Environmental Response Fund (ERF) Grant from Hennepin County for the Carpenter Park Regional Stormwater Improvement. 4o. Adopt Resolution authorizing the special assessment for the repair of the water service line at 2901 Vernon Avenue South, St. Louis Park, MN P.I.D. 31-029-24-33-0010. 4p. Adopt Resolution approving the Assignment and Subordination Agreement with ACSLP, LLC (TPI Hospitality) and Johnson Bank relative to the Amended and Restated Contract for Private Redevelopment with Central Park West, LLC. 4q. Adopt Resolution authorizing the preparation of a feasibility report for the Gorham Parking Lot Reconstruction Project. 4r. Adopt Resolution calling a public hearing regarding the issuance of revenue bonds for the benefit of Sholom Community Alliance, LLC. 4s. Approve for filing Planning Commission Minutes of August 17, 2016. 4t. Approve for filing Parks & Rec Advisory Commission Minutes of April 20, 2016. Meeting: Special Study Session Meeting Date: October 17, 2016 Discussion Item: 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Review of Proposed 2017 CIP, LRFMP and Utility Rates RECOMMENDED ACTION: No formal action required. This report is to assist with the study session discussion regarding the 2017 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), Long Range Financial Management Plan (LRFMP) and Utility Rates. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the Council have any questions or suggested changes to the attached CIP? Is there other information that Council would like to review in more detail? SUMMARY: Included is information on the process involved for creating the 2017 – 2026 CIP, and how it is used in the LRFMP. Definitions for each LRFMP fund presented are provided as well as some key items that are included and not included in the CIP. Directors or designees who have a key role in the CIP will be present to discuss some significant projects being proposed and answer any questions the Council may have. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The CIP and LRFMP work in conjunction with the City’s annual budgeting process in helping to determine an appropriate property tax, HRA levy and aids in maintaining the City’s AAA bond rating. VISION CONSIDERATION: All Vision areas are taken into consideration. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion Location Map Some 2017 Parks & Pavement Mgmt Projects 2017 – 2026 CIP Funding Source Summary 2017 – 2026 CIP Projects by Dept. and Funding Source SWLRT CIP Summary Long Range Financial Management Plan (LRFMP) 2017 Proposed Utility Rates Impact on a Property Prepared by: Tim Simon, Chief Financial Officer Reviewed by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Special Study Session Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 1) Page 2 Title: Review of Proposed 2017 CIP, LRFMP and Utility Rates DISCUSSION Capital Improvement Plan – (CIP) Each year, starting at the end of March or early April, staff is asked to determine the needs of the City and their respective departments regarding purchases or construction of capital items. Generally speaking, a capital item has a cost greater than $5,000 and a useful life of 3 years or more. The CIP is adopted and updated annually. As departments prepare their respective CIP’s, they are asked to provide specific information which is input into the City’s Capital Improvement software. They are asked to consider the importance of the capital need and classify them as follows: 1) Have to do – meaning required by mandate, to maintain a system or business need. 2) Smart to do – meaning makes sound business sense, anticipates opportunities and takes advantage of them. 3) Would like to do – meaning if resources became available or made available, it would make business sense but not as crucial as the Smart to do items. Items such as name, useful life, staff contact, description, justification, cost, funding source and budget impact are some pieces of information that staff prepare. Staff is asked to work with other departments and especially with Finance on items such as cost and funding source, especially when the proposed project or purchase impacts several departments or needs to be funded by several sources. The first draft of the CIP is due to Finance by the middle of May each year, with additional opportunities for revisions occurring in late July and late September or early October. These revision periods are meant for fine tuning costs or funding sources for projects and any possible additions or deletions of projects based on updated business needs or council direction. Long Range Financial Management Plan – (LRFMP) Upon submission of the CIP in the middle of May, Finance is then able to take the information and input the data into the LRFMP. During this process the projects are reviewed by funding source and year, and then are input by funding source total, not individually, into the LRFMP. Next, each fund is looked at individually to determine if current funding projections are adequate to fund the proposed capital items, maintain long-term sustainability and meet suggested fund or cash balance guidelines. Where there are possible challenges, Finance looks at funds that may have potential available resources to reallocate, possible changes in funding, such as debt issuance or revenue enhancements, or delaying/reducing/eliminating some proposed capital items. The latter occurs through discussions with the City Manager and the affected department(s) to determine the best course of action for the City. Fund Definitions Used in the LRFMP To help facilitate the discussion on the LRFMP, staff thought it would be beneficial to provide definitions of the funds in the LRFMP, in addition to some basic information on each fund. The following definitions are in the order of the attached LRFMP document: Cable Television Fund - Produces and broadcasts all cable television programming for cable channels 14, 15, 16, 17 & 96. Revenues are generated from Comcast franchise fees and a Time Warner Grant specifically for capital. The current franchise agreement is scheduled to end in 2021. Significant expenditures paid by this fund are for personnel and capital. Study Session Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 1) Page 3 Title: Review of Proposed 2017 CIP, LRFMP and Utility Rates Police & Fire Pension Fund – This fund was created from an overfunded portion of the state mandated PERF pension that was refunded back to the City a number of years ago. These funds can only be used for capital needs and certain personnel costs related to police or fire purposes. These one-time proceeds have been and will continue to be used primarily for capital purchases. For example, the fund contributed over $2 million to the Fire Stations, is being utilized for the purchase of the dispatch hardware and software and for the purchase of a ladder truck. A few of the 2017 projects include: Fire-Patient Contact System Police-800 MHZ mobile police radios Police-Communication van upgrades Housing Rehabilitation Fund - Primarily covers costs for programs related to maintaining quality and diverse housing stock within the City. The programs in this Fund are funded through the administration fee the City receives from Private Activity Revenue Bonds and some Park Center TIF dollars. The Housing Improvement Areas (HIA’s) are also shown in this Fund, with the fees from each HIA covering the costs of each project. Starting with the 2017 budget, we are looking at the annual STEP ($45,900) contribution to be possibly funded out of Housing Rehab versus the Community Development general fund budget. Development Fund - Used for general City or EDA projects. The fund was created from excess tax increment revenues from pre-1979 districts when the rules on tax increment were much less restrictive. The current sources of revenue are interest income, parking ramp/lot revenues, interfund loan repayments and special assessments. This fund is used to help finance projects by loaning money to other funds, for land purchases or other short-term EDA projects. The Development Fund is essentially a non-renewable fund that cannot be replenished from excess increment any longer due to more strict rules regarding the use of tax increment. Earlier this year, the Council discussed increasing the annual $20,000 contribution to Friends of the Arts. The amount budgeted for 2017 is $40,000. SWLRT base design costs ($500,000) are also included in the 2017 CIP. HRA Levy - This fund is to be used for infrastructure construction in redevelopment areas and qualifying housing programs. The revenue source for this fund is the HRA Tax Levy. This Fund has financed both the Highway 7 & Wooddale project and the Highway 7 & Louisiana project. Currently, this fund’s full resources are obligated until 2018 or 2019 for paying for the Highway 7 and Louisiana project and repaying the Development Fund for funds advanced to cover that project. A portion of the Wooddale reconstruction project in 2020 is programmed in the HRA levy, but we are examining if we could do an interfund loan from the development fund and repaid with TIF Elmwood dollars. Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund (PIR) – Provides cash flow for project construction and is repaid through reimbursements from Municipal State Aid (MSA), or special assessments. The PIR Fund is also used as a short-term borrowing mechanism to other City funds for year-end accounting purposes. Study Session Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 1) Page 4 Title: Review of Proposed 2017 CIP, LRFMP and Utility Rates Park Improvement Fund - This fund is responsible for financing capital expenditures within City parks and improvement of park facilities. The primary sources of revenue are property taxes and Park Dedication Fees. A few of the 2017 projects include: Bass Lake Park Playground Nelson Park Playground Rainbow Park Playground Shelard Park Community Garden Splash Pad at Oak Hill Park Twin Lakes Park Playground Webster Park Playground Pavement Management Fund - Funds are used for pavement rehabilitation within the City. The revenue sources for this fund are CenterPoint and Xcel franchise fees charged to customers within the City. A few of the 2017 projects include: Local Street Rehab (Area 4) Street Reconstruction (Utica Avenue) Bridge-W37th St @ Minnehaha Creek Sidewalk and Trails Fund (Connect the Park) – This fund accounts for revenues and expenditures related to the enhancement of the City’s sidewalks and trails system. The major source of revenue for this fund is General Obligation Bonds (G.O. Bonds) which are repaid through a property tax levy. The possibility of receiving grants in the future will also be explored for financing some of the projects in the plan. Capital Replacement Fund – Funds technology, buildings, and equipment capital expenditures. The primary funding sources are property taxes and charges to other funds for equipment replacement. The Local Government Aid allocated by the State from 2015 and 2016 and projected through 2019 is also in this Fund. Staff has been working really hard to ensure this fund is well maintained over the next 10 years as it finances various capital expenditures. A few of the 2017 projects include: Electronic plan review software Agenda Management System for Staff, Council, and the Public Oak Hill Park Security- Cameras and locking systems City Hall Council Chamber remodel City Hall Council Chamber AV upgrade Fiber Network Expansion, primarily with Street Projects MSC Service bay sealant and stripping MSC Solar panels Westwood Nature Center Building design fees Annual Equipment Replacement Program Rec Center - Remodel Offices Utility Funds: The Utility Funds were reviewed on the September 6, 2016 Council worksession. A summary of the funds is presented. Study Session Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 1) Page 5 Title: Review of Proposed 2017 CIP, LRFMP and Utility Rates Water: For 2017, the City will be in the seventh year of the ten year plan for increasing the fixed rate charges to reduce volatility in the fund due to seasonality usage fluctuations. Usage rates will also be increased to meet more aggressive demands for infrastructure replacement within the City’s aging system. Water mains within the programmed pavement management areas are evaluated for age, condition and number of breaks. Sections that are more than 70 years old, in poor condition, or have had more than five breaks are considered for replacement. Significant expenses for this fund are capital, staffing, the Reilly Superfund site and debt service. Staff is anticipating to issue bonds in the amount of $5m in 2017 and future bond issues in 2019 and 2023. These bonds will be repaid with utility revenues. The rate change is consistent with last year at seven percent. Staff will further study water conservation, irrigation and rates to prepare for recommendations for 2018. Sewer: Rates are also expected to increase due to the City’s more aggressive infrastructure replacement plan. In conjunction with the Water bond issue we anticipate issuing a bond in the amount of $1.75m in 2017. These bonds will be repaid with utility revenues. Sewer costs are mainly to support the Metropolitan Council of Environmental Services charge (MCES), staffing and capital costs. The rate change has been reduced to seven percent in 2017 as compared to 8 percent last year. Storm Water: With the interest the Council and community has in surface water, staff will continue to develop, modify, connect and communicate programs to both the City Council and the community. With the updated 10-year plan staff has reduced the rate increases down to 2.5 percent for 2017 as compared to 10 percent last year. These increases will help meet the increased capital needs and debt service obligations. Significant expenses for this fund currently are capital and staffing. Solid Waste with Organics program update: Staff is recommending changes to the Organics program in accordance with discussions with Council. The recommendation from staff (operations and recreation) is to offer Organics service to all and incorporate costs into a revised rate structure to continue to increase Organics in 2017. Uninsured Loss Fund - This fund covers self-insured workers comp claims, property and liability claim deductibles that are underwritten by the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust. Revenues are from reimbursement on claims or from transfers from the General Fund. Benefits Administration Fund - This fund covers the cost of insurance, unemployment, flex leave payouts, and tuition reimbursement. Revenue sources are from property tax dollars or transfers from the General Fund. This will be a fund that we will be monitoring closely as we have increased expenditures for separation payments. Other Items In addition, we will review some of the Southwest Light Rail Projects that are included in the CIP. Municipal State Aid dollars are allocated mainly for the Texas Avenue South of Minnetonka project in 2017. If time remains staff will preview the debt model for the City Council and how it works in conjunction with the CIP and LRFMP. GF "!;Î kj kj kj kj kj kj kj kj 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1Miles ¯ Legend Rehab Streets (4.5 miles) MSA Street Rehab (1 mile) Proposed Sidewalks (1 mile) Proposed Additional Sidewalks (2.4 miles) Proposed Bikeways (3.8 miles) Proposed Trails (0.45 miles) Alley Rehab Random Repair Concrete Gravel (1,921 ft.) GF Pedestrian Crossing "!;Î Bass Lake Outlet Bridge Rehab !(Walker Pond !(Oregon Pond ")Carpenter Park !@ Gorham Parking Lot City Limits Park Projects kj 40th St. W. & France Ave. S. kj Bass Lake Park Playground kj Nelson Park Playground kj Rainbow Park Playground kj Shelard Park Community Garden kj Splash Pad at Oak Hill Park kj Twin Lakes Park Playground kj Webster Park Playground 2017 Projects Date: 10/10/2016 Document Path: O:\Pubwks\CIP\Maps\2017 Projects\2017 Projects (11 x 17).mxd Special Study Session Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Review of Proposed 2017 CIP, LRFMP and Utility Rates Page 6 Capital Improvement Program City of St. Louis Park, MN FUNDING SOURCE SUMMARY 2017 2026thru Total20172018201920202021Source20222023202420252026 Cable TV - Time Warner Equipment Grant 451,159103,750 14,100 32,909 75,400 36,500 188,500 Capital Replacement Fund 32,375,4044,317,676 3,435,053 2,940,513 3,705,320 3,217,071 3,799,427 3,086,856 2,390,462 2,354,198 3,128,828 E-911 Funds 745,719113,511 39,687 110,921 42,217 43,578 125,007 46,507 123,082 49,736 51,473 EDA Development Fund 2,724,750750,000 774,750 700,000 500,000 G.O. Bonds 42,196,1994,734,600 7,129,499 19,432,200 1,325,000 2,213,000 6,861,900 100,000 200,000 100,000 100,000 G.O. Tax Increment Bonds 3,263,3072,538,303 725,004 Hockey Association 1,041,668104,166 104,166 104,166 104,166 104,166 104,166 104,166 104,166 104,166 104,174 HRA Levy 1,012,5421,012,542 Met Council Grant 2,700,0002,700,000 Municipal State Aid 21,868,7504,018,250 2,580,000 3,132,500 4,852,500 1,979,500 1,416,000 1,830,000 680,000 1,380,000 Park Improvement Fund 13,699,0001,882,000 1,626,000 1,196,000 1,346,000 1,321,000 1,352,000 1,055,000 1,417,000 1,095,000 1,409,000 Pavement Management Fund 39,990,2445,038,166 3,636,865 3,398,303 4,012,380 4,209,361 3,648,350 4,234,269 4,290,350 3,589,850 3,932,350 Police & Fire Pension 2,144,000261,000 347,500 249,500 165,000 43,000 163,000 139,500 449,500 263,000 63,000 PW Operations Budget 3,896,013362,364 492,605 545,547 445,508 451,989 472,500 353,000 358,500 364,000 50,000 Sanitary Sewer Utility 6,819,442785,983 813,119 925,333 785,001 774,001 768,001 798,001 813,001 178,501 178,501 Solid Waste Utility 96,43636,436 55,000 5,000 Special Assessments 1,019,273312,487 108,749 397,058 129,953 71,026 State of Minnesota 4,246,3502,413,600 180,000 1,652,750 Stormwater Utility 7,887,3562,191,667 972,353 494,667 704,667 436,667 827,667 859,667 843,667 335,667 220,667 Tax Increment - Elmwood 3,026,5093,026,509 U.S. Government 7,653,0541,200,000 1,453,054 5,000,000 Unfunded 8,000,0008,000,000 Water Utility 27,858,9913,118,298 2,302,562 3,085,755 2,434,847 3,789,721 2,533,269 2,729,354 2,687,815 2,640,140 2,537,230 29,293,918 41,518,401 42,525,376 24,537,057 18,749,507 234,716,166GRAND TOTAL 22,510,813 15,336,320 14,362,543 12,454,258 13,427,973 Monday, October 10, 2016Page 12017-2026 Draft Capital Improvement Plan Special Study Session Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Review of Proposed 2017 CIP, LRFMP and Utility Rates Page 7 Capital Improvement Program City of St. Louis Park, MN PROJECTS & FUNDING SOURCES BY DEPARTMENT 2017 2026thru Total20172018201920202021Department20222023202420252026Project # Buildings 30170001 75,000ADA Code Correction 75,000 31150001City Hall Garage Overhead Doors 30,00030,000 31170001 300,000City Hall Council Chambers Remodel 300,000 31170002 30,000City Hall Remodel 2nd and 3rd floor restrooms 30,000 31170003 60,000City Hall Floor 3 Roof Top AC Unit 60,000 31190001City Hall Electric Vehicle Charger 15,00015,000 31200001 60,000City Hall Timber Retaining Walls 60,000 31200002 70,000City Hall Floors 1 & 2 Roof Top AC Unit 70,000 31200004 11,000City Hall Office Light LED Replacement 11,000 31210001 15,000City Hall/Police Campus Landscaping 15,000 31230001City Hall ITE & Gould Elect Panel Replacement 25,00025,000 31250001CH Windows, Wall Coatings and Caulking Replacement 200,000200,000 31250002City Hall Window Blinds 15,00015,000 31260001City Hall First Floor Carpet Replacement 35,00035,000 32160002 20,000Police Station Dispatch Kitchen Remodel 20,000 32170001 60,000Police Station replace boiler system 60,000 32170002 90,000Police Station Parking Lot Gate 90,000 32170006 12,000Police Dept. Booking Counter Replacement 12,000 3217003 12,500Police Station Motion Sensors for Lighting 12,500 32180002 210,000Police Station - Replace office furnishings 210,000 32180006 10,000Police Station Roll Call/Training Room Chairs 10,000 Monday, October 10, 2016Page 12017-2026 Draft Capital Improvement Plan Special Study Session Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Review of Proposed 2017 CIP, LRFMP and Utility Rates Page 8 Total20172018201920202021Department20222023202420252026Project # 32190002 45,000Police StationShooting Range Exhaust 45,000 32200001 7,000Police Station Water Heaters 7,000 32210002 40,000Police- Replace Ceiling Tiles 40,000 32210003 80,000Police Station Replace Light Fixtures 80,000 32220001Police Dispatch Remodel 80,00080,000 32220002Police Report Writing Room Remodel 25,00025,000 32220003Police Station Remodel Restrooms 75,00075,000 32240002Police Station Blind Replacement 25,00025,000 33140002 15,000 15,000MSC & Fire Stations CO Nox Sensor Replacement 60,00015,000 15,000 33170001 20,000MSC Convert Exterior HID to LED 20,000 33170002 75,000MSC Service Bay Sealant and Stripping 75,000 33170003 12,000MSC Manual Wash Replacement 12,000 33170004 12,000MSC 1st Floor Office Additions 12,000 33170005 155,000MSC Solar Panels 155,000 33170006 15,000MSC West Bay Work Area Drainage.15,000 33180002 25,000MSC Fuel Station Pump Controls 25,000 33180003 25,000MSC Library Cabinets 25,000 33190001MSC Air Compressor Replacement 15,00015,000 33190002MSC 3rd Bay Sealant and Stripping 50,00050,000 33190003MSC Car Wash Unit Replace with Automatic 180,000180,000 33190004MSC Office LED Bulb Replacement 5,0005,000 33200003 50,000MSC 2nd Bay-Sealant 50,000 33210001 15,000MSC 2nd Floor Office Carpeting/Floor Covering 15,000 33210002 25,000MSC Paint Booth Maintenance 25,000 33220001MSC Bays 1, 2 & 3 Roofing 400,000400,000 33220002MSC Campus Landscaping 10,00010,000 33230003MSC Hoist Replacement 85,00085,000 33240001MSC Interior Light Fixtures Replacment 100,000100,000 33250001MSC Fuel Station Replacement 50,00050,000 34160002 100,000Fire Stations 1 & 2 Apparatus bay floor coating 100,000 34180001 10,000Fire Station 1 & 2 audio/visual replacements 10,000 34180002 5,000Fire Stations 1&2 Lighting Controls Audit 5,000 34190001Fire Station #1 Training Tower 50,00050,000 Monday, October 10, 2016Page 22017-2026 Draft Capital Improvement Plan Special Study Session Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Review of Proposed 2017 CIP, LRFMP and Utility Rates Page 9 Total20172018201920202021Department20222023202420252026Project # 4,546,5001,328,500 790,000 315,000 388,000 370,000Capital Replacement Fund 635,000 175,000 190,000 260,000 95,000 11,000,00011,000,000G.O. Bonds 15,546,5001,328,500 790,000 11,315,000 388,000 370,000Buildings Total 635,000 175,000 190,000 260,000 95,000 modifications 34230001Fire Station 1&2 Mattress replacement 15,00015,000 3424001FS #1 and #2 Carpet Replacement 35,00035,000 34260001Fire Station #1 light fixture replacements 60,00060,000 35240001Fire Station #1 and #2 Landscaping 15,00015,000 3525001Fire Station #2 Replace light fixtures 45,00045,000 36180001 300,000 700,000Westwood Nature Center Building Design Fees 1,000,000 36190002Westwood Naturce Center new building 11,000,00011,000,000 37170001 95,000Rec Center Remodel Offices 95,000 15,546,5001,328,500 790,000 11,315,000 388,000 370,000Buildings Total 635,000 175,000 190,000 260,000 95,000 Cable TV 11151002 20,000Van Camera Cases 20,000 11151003 13,000Van Camera Cables 13,000 11151007 10,000Tripods for On Location 10,000 11151008 16,500Video Switcher 16,500 11151010 750DVD recorders 750 11151012 900Unit pro light kit 900 11161002 500Shotgun mics 500 11161003 300Hand-held mics 300 11161004 35,000Replacement edit systems 35,000 11171001 1,000Wireless mic systems 1,000 11172006 1,000Announcer intercom,1,000 11181001 2,000300-foot audio snake & reel 2,000 11181003 40050-foot audio snake 400 11181005 7,500Camcorders 7,500 11181006 1,500DVD recorders 1,500 11181007 900Unit pro light kit 900 11191001DVD Recorders 500500 1119100312-channel audio mixer 700700 Monday, October 10, 2016Page 32017-2026 Draft Capital Improvement Plan Special Study Session Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Review of Proposed 2017 CIP, LRFMP and Utility Rates Page 10 Total20172018201920202021Department20222023202420252026Project # 451,159103,750 14,100 32,909 75,400 36,500Cable TV - Time Warner Equipment Grant 188,500 451,159103,750 14,100 32,909 75,400 36,500Cable TV Total 188,500 11191004Shotgun mics 500500 11191005Hand-held mics 300300 11191006NLE stations 9,0009,000 11191007Microphones 900900 11191008 1,500Tripods 1,500 11191009 35,000Replacement edit systems 35,000 11201001Van Cameras 120,000120,000 11201002Van Camera Cases 20,00020,000 11201003Van Camera Cables 13,00013,000 11201004 15,000LCD monitors 15,000 11201005 15,000Studio cameras 15,000 11201006 900Microphones 900 11201008 2,500Hard-Drive Video Recorder 2,500 11201009 6,000Converter for Recorder 6,000 11201010Tripods for On Location 12,00012,000 11201011 4,200SD/HD converter 4,200 11201012Video Switcher 16,50016,500 11201013 1,500DVD recorder 1,500 11201014 28,200Playback systems 28,200 11201015Production switcher 7,0007,000 11201016 1,200Teleprompter 1,200 422,650100,950 10,300 11,900 74,500 36,500Cable TV Total 188,500 Engineering 40144000 1,505,000 191,250Storm Water- Bass Lake Preserve Rehab 1,696,250 40161300Traffic Signal - Repl Control Cabinets 46,50046,500 40170003 279,250Concrete Replacement- SW-C&G-CB 279,250 40171000 5,149,687Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 4)5,149,687 40171001 1,070,798Street - Reconstruction (Utica Avenue)1,070,798 40171100 146,926 1,761,552Street - MSA Street Rehab (Louisiana Ave) 1,908,478 Monday, October 10, 2016Page 42017-2026 Draft Capital Improvement Plan Special Study Session Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Review of Proposed 2017 CIP, LRFMP and Utility Rates Page 11 Total20172018201920202021Department20222023202420252026Project # 40171101 4,019,535Street - MSA Street Rehab (Texas S of Mtka) 4,019,535 40171200 556,200Street Mt Proj - Sealcoat Streets (Area 2 & 3) 556,200 40171500 234,000Alley Construction 234,000 40171600 312,487Parking Lot - Gorham 312,487 40171700 2,250,000Bridge - W 37th St @ Minnehaha Creek 2,250,000 40172000 3,109,600CTP! Sidewalk - Trail - Bikeway Installations 2017 3,109,600 40173000 440,000Sanitary Sewer- Mainline Rehab (Area 6) 440,000 40174000 350,000Storm Water- Walker Pond Expansion 350,000 40175000 275,000Water- Rehab WTP 16 Reservior 275,000 40180003 279,250Concrete Replacement- SW-C&G-CB 279,250 40181000 4,233,285Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 6)4,233,285 40181050 744,039Street - Commercial Street Rehab 744,039 40181051 74,750Street - Park Commons @ Monterey 74,750 40181100 523,268Street - MSA Street Rehab (Aquila)523,268 40181200 381,100Street Mt Proj - Sealcoat Streets (Area 4) 381,100 40181500 394,000Alley Construction 394,000 40181600 110,000Parking Lot - City Hall East 110,000 40181601 70,620Parking Lot - MSC 70,620 40181602 108,749Parking Lot - Lake St & Walker 108,749 40181700 2,839,600Bridge - Louisiana Ave @ Minnehaha Creek 2,839,600 40182000 2,625,300CTP! Sidewalk - Trail - Bikeway Installations 2018 2,625,300 40183000 460,000Sanitary Sewer- Mainline Rehab (Area 7) 460,000 40184000 300,000Storm Water- Oregon Pond Basin Rehab 300,000 40184100 50,000 100,000Storm Water- Local SW Mgmt Plan 150,000 40190003Concrete Replacement- SW-C&G-CB 279,250279,250 40191000Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 7)3,950,0843,950,084 40191050Street - Commercial Street Rehab 764,078764,078 40191100Street - MSA Street Rehab (CLR E of Lou) 2,190,5152,190,515 40191101Street - MSA Street Rehab (Ottawa)323,276323,276 40191102Street - MSA Street Rehab (Beltline Blvd) 1,026,9711,026,971 Monday, October 10, 2016Page 52017-2026 Draft Capital Improvement Plan Special Study Session Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Review of Proposed 2017 CIP, LRFMP and Utility Rates Page 12 Total20172018201920202021Department20222023202420252026Project # 40191200Street Mt Proj - Sealcoat Streets (Area 5) 381,100381,100 40191500Alley Construction 314,000314,000 40191600Parking Lot - Lake and Wooddale (NW corner) 397,058397,058 40192000CTP! Sidewalk - Trail - Bikeway Installations 2019 8,011,2008,011,200 40193000Sanitary Sewer- Mainline Rehab (Area 8) 480,000480,000 40194000Storm Water- Sumter Pond Rehab 90,00090,000 40195000Water - Recoat Reservoir 2 @ WTP #6 935,000935,000 40199000 500,000 2,357,228 500,000SWLRT- Base Design 3,978,228621,000 40199001 746,971SWLRT- LRCI 33 - Trail (Louisiana to Wooddale) 746,971 40199003 925,040SWLRT- LRCI 32 - CSAH 25 @ Beltline Blvd. 925,040 40199004 500,000SWLRT- Regional Trail Bridge Upgrades 500,000 40199005 100,000SWLRT- Whistle Quiet @ Wooddale and Beltline 100,000 40199006 5,766,317SWLRT- Park and Ride Ramp at Beltline Station 11,491,3215,725,004 40199007 1,200,000 1,000,000SWLRT- Wooddale Ave Bridge Widening 2,200,000 40200003 279,250Concrete Replacement- SW-C&G-CB 279,250 40201000 4,942,093Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 8)4,942,093 40201050 750,951Street - Commercial Street Rehab 750,951 40201100 4,957,304Street - MSA Street Rehab (Texas Ave N of Mtka) 4,957,304 40201200 381,100Street Mt Proj - Sealcoat Streets (Area 6) 381,100 40201300 100,000Railroad - Whistle Quiet Zones 100,000 40201500 377,000Alley Construction 377,000 40201600 38,588Parking Lot - City Hall Lower 38,588 40201601 17,850Parking Lot - Fire Stn #1 17,850 40201602 12,600Parking Lot - Fire Stn #2 12,600 40202000 1,025,000CTP! Sidewalk - Trail - Bikeway Installations 2020 1,025,000 40203000 510,000Sanitary Sewer- Mainline Rehab (Area 1) 510,000 40204000 109,000Storm Water- Lamplighter Pond Rehab 109,000 40204001 270,000Storm Water- Browndale Pond Rehab 270,000 40206000 2,039,051Street- W36th Street Reconstruction 2,039,051 Monday, October 10, 2016Page 62017-2026 Draft Capital Improvement Plan Special Study Session Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Review of Proposed 2017 CIP, LRFMP and Utility Rates Page 13 Total20172018201920202021Department20222023202420252026Project # 40206001 2,000,000Street- Wooddale Ave Reconstruction 2,000,000 40210003 279,250Concrete Replacement- SW-C&G-CB 279,250 40211000 4,978,070Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 1)4,978,070 40211050 760,476Street - Commercial Street Rehab 760,476 40211100 2,178,675Street - MSA Street Rehab (CLR W of Lou) 2,178,675 40211200 381,100Street Mt Proj - Sealcoat Streets (Area 7) 381,100 40211500 322,000Alley Construction 322,000 40211600 129,953Parking Lot - Alabama & Excelsior Blvd 129,953 40212000 1,813,000CTP! Sidewalk - Trail - Bikeway Installations 2021 1,813,000 40213000 520,000Sanitary Sewer- Mainline Rehab (Area 2) 520,000 40214000 300,000Storm Water- MCWD Cold Storage Site 300,000 40214001 109,000Storm Water- Otten Pond Rehab 109,000 40215000 1,540,000Water- Recoat Elevated Water Tower #2 1,540,000 40220003Concrete Replacement- SW-C&G-CB 279,250279,250 40221000Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 2)4,401,0004,401,000 40221050Street - Commercial Street Rehab 687,178687,178 40221100Street - MSA Street Rehab (Shelard Pkwy) 1,570,5911,570,591 40221200Street Mt Proj - Sealcoat Streets (Area 8) 381,100381,100 40221500Alley Construction 392,000392,000 40221600Parking Lot - 27th St & Louisiana 71,02571,025 40221700Bridge - 34th Street @ Minnehaha Creek 891,500891,500 40222000CTP! Sidewalk - Trail - Bikeway Installations 2022 6,361,9006,361,900 40223000Sanitary Sewer- Mainline Rehab (Area 3) 540,000540,000 40224000Storm Water- Westdale Sed Basin Rehab 248,000248,000 40230003Concrete Replacement- SW-C&G-CB 279,250279,250 40231000Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 3)5,365,0005,365,000 40231050Street - Commercial Street Rehab 839,350839,350 40231100Street - MSA Street Rehab (Oxford/Edgwd/Cambridge) 2,023,0042,023,004 40231200Street Mt Proj - Sealcoat Streets (Area 1) 381,100381,100 Monday, October 10, 2016Page 72017-2026 Draft Capital Improvement Plan Special Study Session Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Review of Proposed 2017 CIP, LRFMP and Utility Rates Page 14 Total20172018201920202021Department20222023202420252026Project # 2,074,750500,000 574,750 500,000 500,000EDA Development Fund 28,471,1994,309,600 6,729,499 8,132,200 1,125,000 1,813,000G.O. Bonds 6,361,900 3,263,3072,538,303 725,004G.O. Tax Increment Bonds 1,012,5421,012,542HRA Levy 40231500Alley Construction 287,000287,000 40231600Parking Lot - Louisiana Park & Ride (N&S) 105,919105,919 40233000Sanitary Sewer- Mainline Rehab (Area 4) 570,000570,000 40234000Storm Water- Cedar Manor Lake Rehab 528,000528,000 40240003Concrete Replacement- SW-C&G-CB 279,250279,250 40241000Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 4)5,742,0005,742,000 40241050Street - Commercial Street Rehab 777,262777,262 40241100Street - MSA Street Rehab (W28th St)851,553851,553 40241200Street Mt Proj - Sealcoat Streets (Area 2) 381,100381,100 40241500Alley Construction 196,000196,000 40243000Sanitary Sewer- Mainline Rehab (Area 5) 580,000580,000 40244000Storm Water- Louisiana Oaks Pond Rehab 500,000500,000 40250003Concrete Replacement- SW-C&G-CB 279,250279,250 40251000Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 5)5,074,5005,074,500 40251050Street - Commercial Street Rehab 724,640724,640 40251100Street - MSA Street Rehab (TBD)1,380,0001,380,000 40251200Street Mt Proj - Sealcoat Streets (Area 3) 381,100381,100 40251500Alley Construction 197,000197,000 40261000Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 6)5,074,5005,074,500 40261050Street - Commercial Street Rehab 763,730763,730 40261200Street Mt Proj - Sealcoat Streets (Area 4) 381,100381,100 40261500Alley Construction 140,000140,000 40261700Bridge - Meadowbrook @ Minnehaha Creek 2,135,5002,135,500 53175000 35,000Reilly Site - Install Monitor Well (W413)35,000 53185003 5,000,000Water Project - WTP #6 Treatment Upgrade 5,000,000 162,272,80121,483,483 31,492,319 25,535,036 18,409,787 13,311,524Engineering Total 15,823,544 10,378,623 9,307,165 8,036,490 8,494,830 Monday, October 10, 2016Page 82017-2026 Draft Capital Improvement Plan Special Study Session Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Review of Proposed 2017 CIP, LRFMP and Utility Rates Page 15 Total20172018201920202021Department20222023202420252026Project # 2,700,0002,700,000Met Council Grant 21,868,7504,018,250 2,580,000 3,132,500 4,852,500 1,979,500Municipal State Aid 1,416,000 1,830,000 680,000 1,380,000 39,990,2445,038,166 3,636,865 3,398,303 4,012,380 4,209,361Pavement Management Fund 3,648,350 4,234,269 4,290,350 3,589,850 3,932,350 1,438,013187,364 142,105 189,547 144,008 144,989PW Operations Budget 145,000 145,000 145,000 145,000 50,000 6,312,000724,650 715,350 788,000 719,000 729,000Sanitary Sewer Utility 749,000 779,000 789,000 159,500 159,500 1,019,273312,487 108,749 397,058 129,953Special Assessments 71,026 4,246,3502,413,600State of Minnesota 180,000 1,652,750 7,240,2502,125,000 866,250 365,000 654,000 384,000Stormwater Utility 773,000 803,000 775,000 275,000 220,000 3,026,5093,026,509Tax Increment - Elmwood 7,653,0541,200,000 1,453,054 5,000,000U.S. Government 5,000,0005,000,000Unfunded 26,756,5603,067,966 2,133,794 2,907,423 2,363,848 3,621,721Water Utility 2,479,269 2,587,354 2,627,815 2,487,140 2,480,230 162,072,80121,483,483 31,592,319 25,535,035 18,409,787 13,011,524Engineering Total 15,823,545 10,378,623 9,307,165 8,036,490 8,494,830 Fire 977,583197,300 26,000 33,500 32,000 178,000Capital Replacement Fund 14,000 436,283 8,000 52,500 25,00025,000Police & Fire Pension 65170001 79,000SCBA Radio & TIC Integration 79,000 65170002 25,000Knox Box Key Security Improvement 25,000 65180001 10,000UAV 10,000 65990001 8,000 16,000 8,000Thermal Imagers 80,0008,000 8,000 8,000 16,0008,000 65990002 20,000 20,000Outside Warning Sirens 80,00020,000 20,000 65990003SCBA 387,642387,642 65990004 22,000 22,000Hydraulic Rescue Tool 74,00030,000 65990005 35,000 39,000Auto-CPR Device 74,000 65990006 150,000Turnouts 150,000 65990007 30,000Helmets/Boots 65,00035,000 65990008Air Monitors 18,0005,500 6,000 6,500 65990009 35,000AED's 74,00039,000 65990010 20,000Body Armor 20,000 65990011 6,500 7,200RAD 57 21,5007,800 1,158,142211,500 117,000 33,500 39,000 185,200Fire Total 14,000 450,642 54,800 52,500 Monday, October 10, 2016Page 92017-2026 Draft Capital Improvement Plan Special Study Session Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Review of Proposed 2017 CIP, LRFMP and Utility Rates Page 16 Total20172018201920202021Department20222023202420252026Project # 1,002,583222,300 26,000 33,500 32,000 178,000Fire Total 14,000 436,283 8,000 52,500 Operations & Recreation 21155649 25,000Skate Park Equipment Replacement 25,000 21170302 450,000Field Lights & Poles Upgrade-Aquila Park 450,000 21171333 15,000Dog Park Lighting-Cedar Knoll Park 15,000 21172106 17,500Parking Lot Seal Coat - Fern Hill Park 17,500 21174402 20,000Oak Hill Park Additional Shelter near Splash Pad 20,000 21174404 60,000Splash Pad Feature Replacement-Oak Hill Park 60,000 21174422 50,000Park Shelter Replacement (Central)- Oak Hill Park 50,000 21175921 10,000Landscaping-Victoria Lake 10,000 21176424 10,000Wolfe Park Pergola Work 10,000 21176431 15,000Wolfe Park Improvements 15,000 21176501 20,00040th & France Master Plan 20,000 21179919 30,000Trail Sealcoat - Various Trails 30,000 21180301 7,500Court Resurface (BB) Aquila Park 7,500 21180305 35,000Parking Lot Resurface - Aquila Park 35,000 21180321 7,000Repaint Park Building - Aquila Park 7,000 21180622 7,000Repaint Park Building - Birchwood Park 7,000 21181023 7,000Repaint Park Building - Browndale Park 7,000 21181124 6,000Repaint Park Building - Carpenter Park 6,000 21181306 8,000Parking Lot Resurface - Cedar Knoll Park 8,000 21181325 2,000Repaint Park Building - Cedar Knoll Park 2,000 21181707 8,000Parking Lot Resurface - Creekside Park 8,000 21181826 4,000Repaint Park Building - Dakota Park 4,000 21182127 5,000Repaint Park Building - Fern Hill Park 5,000 21182634 7,000Park Sun Shelter Roof - Jackley Park 7,000 21183202 50,00040th & France Fencing & Parking Lot 50,000 21183628 7,000Repaint Park Building - Louisiana Oaks Park 7,000 21184208 8,000Parking Lot Resurface - Nelson Park 8,000 21184229 7,000Repaint Park Building - Nelson Park 7,000 Monday, October 10, 2016Page 102017-2026 Draft Capital Improvement Plan Special Study Session Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Review of Proposed 2017 CIP, LRFMP and Utility Rates Page 17 Total20172018201920202021Department20222023202420252026Project # 21184330 6,000Repaint Park Building - Northside Park 6,000 21184431 9,000Repaint Park Building - Oak Hill Park 9,000 21185102 2,000Court Resurface (BB) Roxbury Park 2,000 21185203 2,000Court Resurface (BB) Shelard Park 2,000 21186210 35,000Parking Lot Resurface - Westwood Hills NC 35,000 21186404 3,000Court Resurface (BB) Wolfe Park 3,000 21189934 7,000Playground Improvements 7,000 21190304Parking Lot Seal Coat - Aquila Park 20,00020,000 21190613Trail Reconstruction - Birchwood Park 10,00010,000 21190714Trail Reconstruction - Jordan Trail 10,00010,000 21191002Light Replacement Hockey Rink- Browndale Park 85,00085,000 21191805Parking Lot Seal Coat - Dakota Park 20,00020,000 21191815Trail Reconstruction - Dakota Park 75,00075,000 21192116Trail Reconstruction - Fern Hill Park 45,00045,000 21199901ADA Connections to Picnic Shelter/Playgrounds 20,00020,000 21199917Trail Sealcoat - Various Trails 30,00030,000 21200419 13,500Trail Sealcoat - Bass Lake 13,500 21200912 15,000Trail Reconstruction - Bronx Park 15,000 21202401 60,000ADA Trail Compliance - Cedar Manor Park Trail 60,000 21203013 20,000Trail Reconstruction - Keystone Park 20,000 21204314 20,000Trail Reconstruction - Northside Park 20,000 21205009 60,000Parking Lot Seal Coat - Rec Center 60,000 21209901 15,000ADA Compliant - Picnic Tables 15,000 21210411 100,000Trail Reconstruction - Bass Lake Park 100,000 21211119 125,000Carpenter Park Tennis Court Renovation 125,000 21213614 65,000Trail Reconstruction - Louisiana Oaks Park 65,000 21214415 75,000Trail Reconstruction - Oak Hill Park 75,000 21216416 85,000Trail Reconstruction - Wolfe Park 85,000 21219912 45,000Trail Reconstruction - Franklin 45,000 21219913 45,000Trail Reconstruction - Jordan 45,000 21224109Trail Reconstruction - Minnehaha Creek 50,00050,000 21234611Trail Reconstruction - Otten Pond 30,00030,000 21235112Trail Reconstruction - Roxbury Park 10,00010,000 Monday, October 10, 2016Page 112017-2026 Draft Capital Improvement Plan Special Study Session Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Review of Proposed 2017 CIP, LRFMP and Utility Rates Page 18 Total20172018201920202021Department20222023202420252026Project # 21235813Trail Reconstruction - Twin Lakes Park 10,00010,000 21240130Repaint Park Building - Cedar Knoll Park 2,0002,000 21240306Repaint Park Building - Aquila Park 7,0007,000 21240317Trail Reconstruction - Aquila Park 75,00075,000 21240607Repaint Park Building - Birchwood Park 7,0007,000 21241008Repaint Park Building - Browndale Park 7,0007,000 21241109Repaint Park Building - Carpenter Park 6,0006,000 21241118Trail Reconstruction - Carpenter Park 50,00050,000 21241811Repaint Park Building - Dakota Park 4,0004,000 21242112Repaint Park Building - Fern Hill Park 5,0005,000 21242719Trail Reconstruction - Jersey Park 30,00030,000 21243613Repaint Park Building - Louisiana Oaks Park 7,0007,000 21244214Repaint Park Building - Nelson Park 7,0007,000 21244315Repaint Park Building - Northside Park 6,0006,000 21244416Repaint Park Building - Oak Hill Park 9,0009,000 21253401Trail Reconstruction - Lamplighter Park 40,00040,000 21254401Light Replacement Hockey Rink-Oak Hill Park 80,00080,000 21254402Lighting Control System System-Oak Hill Park 50,00050,000 21256202Trail Reconstruction - Westwood Hills NC 30,00030,000 21256403Wolfe Park Amphitheater Pavers 100,000100,000 21259903Trail Reconstruction 100,000100,000 21259905Park Shelter Replacement 150,000150,000 21259906Trail Lighting 100,000100,000 21990101Playground Eqpt Repl - Ainsworth Park 65,00065,000 21990301Playground Eqpt Repl - Aquila Park 85,00085,000 21990507 60,000Playground Eqpt Repl - Bass Lake Park 60,000 21990611 62,500Playground Eqpt Repl - Birchwood Park 62,500 21990902 65,000Playground Eqpt Repl - Bronx Park 65,000 21991002Playground Eqpt Repl - Browndale Park 65,00065,000 21991102Playground Eqpt Repl - Carpenter Park 65,00065,000 21991403 65,000Playground Eqpt Repl - Cedar Manor Park 65,000 21991503Playground Eqpt Repl - Cedarhurst Park 65,00065,000 Monday, October 10, 2016Page 122017-2026 Draft Capital Improvement Plan Special Study Session Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Review of Proposed 2017 CIP, LRFMP and Utility Rates Page 19 Total20172018201920202021Department20222023202420252026Project # 21991604 65,000Playground Eqpt Repl - Center Park 65,000 21991712Playground Eqpt Repl - Parkview Park 60,00060,000 21991918Playground Eqpt Repl - Edgebrook Park 65,00065,000 21992110Playground Eqpt Repl - Fern Hill Park 65,00065,000 21992611Playground Eqpt Repl - Jackley Park 65,00065,000 21992801Playground Eqpt Repl - Jorvig Park 65,00065,000 21993217 65,000Playground Eqpt Repl - Knollwood Green 65,000 21993801Playground Eqpt Repl - Meadowbrook Manor Park 65,00065,000 21994002 60,000Playground Eqpt Repl - Minikahda Vista Park 60,000 21994312 62,500Playground Eqpt Repl - Northside Park 62,500 21994401 5,000Oak Hill Park Northern Lights (LED)5,000 21994402Playground Eqpt Repl - Oak Hill Park (Tot) 67,00067,000 21994502 65,000Playground Eqpt Repl - Oregon Park 65,000 21994803Playground Eqpt Repl - Pennsylvania Park 60,00060,000 21994908 50,000Playground Eqpt Repl - Rainbow Park 50,000 21995113 62,500Playground Eqpt Repl - Roxbury Park 62,500 21995214 62,500Playground Eqpt Repl - Shelard Park 62,500 21995403 65,000Playground Eqpt Repl - Sunset Park 65,000 21995406Playground Eqpt Repl - Sunshine Park 65,00065,000 21995607Playground Eqpt Repl - Texa-Tonka Park 65,00065,000 21995809 60,000Playground Eqpt Repl - Twin Lakes Park 60,000 21996110 60,000Playground Eqpt Repl - Webster Park 60,000 21996204 100,000Playground Eqpt Repl - Westwood Hills NC 100,000 21996308Playground Eqpt Repl - Willow Park 65,00065,000 21996402Playground Eqpt Repl - Wolfe Park EVOS 100,000100,000 21996403Playground Eqpt Repl - Wolfe Park (tot)67,00067,000 21999902 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000Playground Woodchips 180,00020,000 20,000 20,000 20,00020,000 21999903 100,000 100,000Trail Repayment - Minnehaha Creek 260,00060,000 21999904Playground Equipment Replacement 200,000200,000 21999905 15,000 15,000ADA accessibility improvements 30,000 22173203 25,000Knollwood Canoe Landing - Dredge and Rebuild 25,000 Monday, October 10, 2016Page 132017-2026 Draft Capital Improvement Plan Special Study Session Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Review of Proposed 2017 CIP, LRFMP and Utility Rates Page 20 Total20172018201920202021Department20222023202420252026Project # 22175228 20,000Community Garden - Shelard Park 20,000 22181035 15,000Community Garden - Browndale 15,000 22193603Louisiana Canoe Landing Trail Access Rebuild 10,00010,000 22206115 15,000Park Community Garden - Webster Park 15,000 22999901 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000Tree Replacement 675,00075,000 75,000 75,000 75,00075,000 23176210ADA Compliant - Westwood Hills NC Brickhouse 50,00050,000 23176222 10,000Westwood Hills NC North Staircase Overlook 10,000 23176223 20,000Westwood Hills NC-Prairie Deck Rebuild 20,000 23186204 15,000Westwood Hills NC Y-Dock Redecking 15,000 23186232 6,000Westwood Hills NC Lower Building Maint 6,000 23196218Westwood Hills NC Boardwalk Deck Repl, Phase 2 50,00050,000 23196219Westwood Hills NC Brick House Furniture Repl 6,0006,000 23196220Westwood Hills NC Interpretive Exhibit Repl 150,000150,000 23206216 40,000Westwood Hills NC Staircase Rebuild 40,000 23216201 40,000Westwood Hills NC Rotary Deck Rebuild 40,000 23216217 10,000Westwood Hills NC Furniture Repl 10,000 23226210Westwood Hills NC Water Garden, Phase 2 75,00075,000 23236214Westwood Hills NC Trail Bench Replacement 25,00025,000 23246220Westwood Hills NC Boardwalk Deck Repl, Phase 3 50,00050,000 23256203Westwood Hills NC Boardwalk Deck Repl, Phase 1 100,000100,000 23256204Westwood Hills NC Waterfall 50,00050,000 23266202Westwood Hills NC Trail Sign Replacement 30,00030,000 23996227 30,500 22,500Westwood Hillls NC Master Revegetation Plan 53,000 24175013 15,000Rec Center Banquet Room/Gallery Furniture Repl 15,000 24175014 200,000Rec Center Pneumatics 200,000 24175016 20,000Rec Center Hot Water Heater Tank Replacement 20,000 24175017 50,000Rec Center Programming Office AC 50,000 Monday, October 10, 2016Page 142017-2026 Draft Capital Improvement Plan Special Study Session Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Review of Proposed 2017 CIP, LRFMP and Utility Rates Page 21 Total20172018201920202021Department20222023202420252026Project # Replacement 24175018 17,000Rec Center Programming Office Carpet 17,000 24175030 15,000Rec Center Rental Skate Additions 15,000 24185015 50,000Rec Center Banquet & Gallery Remodel 50,000 24185016 120,000Rec Center Door Replacement (Front & Arena) 120,000 24185017 15,000Rec Center Landscaping 15,000 24185018 500,000Rec Center Roof Rplc-East Arena/Front Office 500,000 24185019 100,000Rec Center Upstairs Bthrm&Ctrng Kitchn Remodel 100,000 24185020 40,000Rec Center West Arena Window Replacement 40,000 24195010Rec Center Banquet Room & Gallery Chair Repl. 15,00015,000 24195011Rec Center East Arena Locker Room Remodel 50,00050,000 24195012Rec Center Front Office AC Replacement 75,00075,000 24195013Rec Center East Arena Score Boards 30,00030,000 24205005 300,000Rec Center Aquatic Park Amenity Replacement 300,000 24205006 50,000Rec Center Banquet Room PA Upgrade 50,000 24205008 200,000Rec Center Marquee 200,000 24205010 75,000Rec Center Aquatic Park Sun Shelter Repl 75,000 24205011 10,000Rec Center Rental Skate Replacement (Ph 1) 10,000 24205012 32,500Rec Center Scoreboard Replacement 32,500 24215006 15,000Rec Center Arena Compressor Rebuild 15,000 24215007 250,000Rec Center Arena Rubber Floor 250,000 24215008 25,000Rec Center Dasher Board Repair 25,000 24215009 15,000Rec Center Landscaping 15,000 242150110 10,000Rec Center Rental Skate Replacement (Ph 2) 10,000 24215018 50,000Rec Center Lighting Upgrade 50,000 24225006Rec Center East Arena Painting 60,00060,000 24225007Rec Center Arenas Rubber Floor Replacement 250,000250,000 24225010Rec Center Skate Sharpener 25,00025,000 24235007Rec Center Arena Compressor Rebuild 15,00015,000 24235008Rec Center Arena Water Treatment 75,00075,000 Monday, October 10, 2016Page 152017-2026 Draft Capital Improvement Plan Special Study Session Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Review of Proposed 2017 CIP, LRFMP and Utility Rates Page 22 Total20172018201920202021Department20222023202420252026Project # Repl 24235009Rec Center West Arena Painting 75,00075,000 24235010Rec Center West Arena Roof Replacement 500,000500,000 24245003Rec Center East Arena Dehumidification 400,000400,000 24245004Rec Center Generator Replacement 500,000500,000 24245005Rec Center Landscaping 20,00020,000 24265001Recreation Outdoor Complex - Turf Replacement 95,00095,000 24265004Rec Center Boiler Replacement 1,000,0001,000,000 24995003Rec Center Dasher Boards 150,000150,000 25170211 200,000Rec Center Aquatic Park Filter Replacement 200,000 25170212 20,000Rec Center Aquatic Park Pump Rebuild 20,000 25170215 5,000Rec Center Concession Eqpt. Replacement 5,000 25200217 25,000Rec Center Aquatic Park Main Drain Replacement 25,000 25205007 5,000Rec Center Concession Eqpt. Replacement 5,000 25220205Rec Center Aquatic Park Locker Room Remodel 100,000100,000 25230204Rec Center Concession Eqpt. Replacement 5,0005,000 25990212 5,000Rec Center Aquatic Park Deck Furniture 20,0005,000 10,000 50174101 160,000Street Light Annual Replacement (2017)160,000 50174301 15,000Traffic Signal Annual Painting (2017)15,000 50184101 165,000Street Light Annual Replacement (2018)165,000 50184102 170,000Street Light Replacement, SSD1A (2018) 170,000 50184301 15,500Traffic Signal Annual Painting (2018)15,500 50194101Street Light Annual Replacement (2019)170,000170,000 50194102Street Light Replacement, SSD1B (2019) 170,000170,000 50194301Traffic Signal Annual Painting (2019)16,00016,000 50204101 175,000Street Light Annual Replacement (2020)175,000 50204102 110,000Street Light Replacement, SSD2A (2020) 110,000 50204301 16,500Traffic Signal Annual Painting (2020)16,500 50214101 180,000Street Light Annual Replacement (2021)180,000 50214102 110,000Street Light Replacement, SSD2B 110,000 Monday, October 10, 2016Page 162017-2026 Draft Capital Improvement Plan Special Study Session Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Review of Proposed 2017 CIP, LRFMP and Utility Rates Page 23 Total20172018201920202021Department20222023202420252026Project # (2020) 50214301 17,000Traffic Signal Annual Painting (2021)17,000 50224101Street Light Annual Replacement (2022)185,000185,000 50224102Street Light Replacement, SSD3 (2022)125,000125,000 50224301Traffic Signal Annual Painting (2022)17,50017,500 50234101Street Light Annual Replacement (2023)190,000190,000 50234301Traffic Signal Annual Painting (2023)18,00018,000 50244101Street Light Annual Replacement (2024)195,000195,000 50244301Traffic Signal Annual Painting (2024)18,50018,500 50254101Street Light Annual Replacement (2025)200,000200,000 50254301Traffic Signal Annual Painting (2025)19,00019,000 53175003 34,000Water Well Rehab (SLP14)34,000 53175101 30,000Sanitary Sewer LS Maint (LS #13)30,000 53175102 15,000Sanitary Sewer LS Maint (LS #23)15,000 53175301 22,000Storm Sewer LS Maint (LS #7)22,000 53175302 44,000Annual Catch Basin Repairs (2017)44,000 53185001 71,000Water Treatment Plant GAC Replacement (WTP1) 71,000 53185002 35,000Water Well Rehab (SLP6)35,000 53185004 3,000,000Water Project - WTP #4 Treatment Upgrade 3,000,000 53185101 45,000Sanitary Sewer LS Maint (LS #9)45,000 53185301 23,000Storm Sewer LS Maint (LS #8)23,000 53185302 46,000Annual Catch Basin Repairs (2018)46,000 53195001Water Well Rehab (SLP4)35,00035,000 53195002Water Treatment Plant GAC Replacement (WTP4) 71,00071,000 53195101Sanitary Sewer LS Maint (LS #21)45,00045,000 53195102Sanitary Sewer LS Maint (LS #4)15,00015,000 53195301Storm Sewer LS Impr (Add SCADA to Stns 1/5/7/8/9) 25,00025,000 53195302Annual Catch Basin Repairs (2019)48,00048,000 53205002 52,000Water Well Rehab (SLP11)52,000 53205101 47,000Sanitary Sewer LS Maint (LS #22)47,000 53205301 50,000Annual Catch Basin Repairs (2020)50,000 53215001 74,000Water Treatment Plant GAC Replacement (WTP4) 74,000 53215002 75,000Water Treatment Plant GAC Replacement (WTP1) 75,000 Monday, October 10, 2016Page 172017-2026 Draft Capital Improvement Plan Special Study Session Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Review of Proposed 2017 CIP, LRFMP and Utility Rates Page 24 Total20172018201920202021Department20222023202420252026Project # 16,042,0901,416,510 1,721,562 1,610,769 2,198,523 1,402,255Capital Replacement Fund 2,138,454 1,400,502 1,135,947 929,591 2,087,977 1,041,668104,166 104,166 104,166 104,166 104,166Hockey Association 104,166 104,166 104,166 104,166 104,174 13,346,0001,815,000 1,583,000 1,171,000 1,346,000 1,310,000Park Improvement Fund 1,200,000 1,000,000 1,417,000 1,095,000 1,409,000 2,458,000175,000 350,500 356,000 301,500 307,000PW Operations Budget 327,500 208,000 213,500 219,000 259,43645,000 81,436 60,000 47,000 26,000Sanitary Sewer Utility 36,43636,436Solid Waste Utility 574,43666,000 105,436 73,000 50,000 52,000Stormwater Utility 54,000 56,000 58,000 60,000 3,000,0003,000,000Unfunded 839,43634,000 142,436 106,000 52,000 149,000Water Utility 35,000 113,000 36,000 134,000 38,000 37,597,5023,655,676 7,124,972 3,480,935 4,099,189 3,350,421Operations & Recreation Total 3,859,120 2,881,668 2,964,613 2,541,757 3,639,151 53215101 26,000Sanitary Sewer LS Maint (LS #15)26,000 53215301 52,000Annual Catch Basin Repairs (2021)52,000 53225001Water Well Rehab (SLP15)35,00035,000 53225301Annual Catch Basin Repairs (2022)54,00054,000 53235001Water Treatment Plant GAC Replacement (WTP4) 77,00077,000 53235002Water Well Rehab (SLP8)36,00036,000 53235301Annual Catch Basin Repairs (2023)56,00056,000 53245001Water Well Rehab (SLP16)36,00036,000 53245301Annual Catch Basin Repairs (2024)58,00058,000 53255001Water Well Rehab (SLP12)54,00054,000 53255002Water Treatment Plant GAC Replacement (WTP4) 80,00080,000 53255301Annual Catch Basin Repairs (2025)60,00060,000 53265001Water Well Rehab (SLP10)38,00038,000 E - XX01 1,416,510 1,867,306 2,198,523 1,402,255Annual Equipment Replacement Program 16,187,8341,610,769 2,138,454 1,400,502 929,591 2,087,9771,135,947 36,555,8343,551,510 7,020,806 3,376,769 3,995,023 3,246,255Operations & Recreation Total 3,754,954 2,777,502 2,860,447 2,437,591 3,534,977 Police PD - 1 10,700 26,200 5,200 5,200Laser/Radar and Message Board 57,7005,200 5,200 PD - 2911 Server Replacement 145,00070,000 75,000 202,70010,700 26,200 75,200 5,200 5,200Police Total 5,200 75,000 Monday, October 10, 2016Page 182017-2026 Draft Capital Improvement Plan Special Study Session Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Review of Proposed 2017 CIP, LRFMP and Utility Rates Page 25 Total20172018201920202021Department20222023202420252026Project # 57,70010,700 26,200 5,200 5,200 5,200Capital Replacement Fund 5,200 145,00070,000E-911 Funds 75,000 202,70010,700 26,200 75,200 5,200 5,200Police Total 5,200 75,000 Technology 13125001 25,000 25,000IR: PCI Re-Assessment / Training / Security 75,00025,000 13135001 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000IR: Hosted / Managed Services / DR / BC 750,00075,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,00075,000 13135003 10,000OR / Utilities: SCADA Solution 20,00010,000 13135004OR: AVL / GPS 40,00020,000 20,000 13145002 6,000Assessing: Wireless Equipment for Field Work 6,000 13145010Police: New CAD/RMS/Mobile Suite 400,000400,000 13155002 675,000 400,000 200,000 400,000IR: Fiber - Sidewalks / Streets / Citywide 2,975,000300,000 500,000 100,000 100,000 100,000200,000 13155006 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000Admin Serv:Document Mgmt System Maintenance 400,00040,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,00040,000 13155007 17,500 17,500 17,500 17,500IR: MyStLouisPark CRM 175,00017,500 17,500 17,500 17,500 17,50017,500 13155008 100,000IR: City Hall Council Chambers AV Upgrade 100,000 13155010 10,000Insp: Scanner 20,00010,000 13155014 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000Admin Serv / Utilities: Infinity BI Service 20,0002,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,0002,000 13155016Eng: Survey GPS 15,00015,000 13155017 13,000 13,000Police: ZuercherTech FBR Tablet Add- On Module 39,00013,000 13155020 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000Police: ZuercherTech Crime Analysis Add-On Module 130,00013,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,00013,000 13165001OR: RecTrac / WebTrac Replacement 65,00065,000 13165004 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000IR: Website Maintenance 100,00010,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,00010,000 13165007 16,000 4,000Admin Serv: HR Time Management System 40,0004,000 4,000 4,000 4,0004,000 13165008Fire: Zuercher Integration of Fatpot Upgrade 100,000100,000 13165009 58,000 18,000 18,000 18,000Insp: Electronic Plans Review Software 220,00018,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,00018,000 13175001 25,000Eng: GPS Base Station 25,000 13175003 125,000Fire: Station Alerting Upgrade 125,000 13175004 8,000Eng: Trimble R2 GPS Receiver 8,000 13175005 5,000Eng: Cartegraph iPads 5,000 13175006 15,000IR: Wireless Controller Expansion 30,00015,000 Monday, October 10, 2016Page 192017-2026 Draft Capital Improvement Plan Special Study Session Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Review of Proposed 2017 CIP, LRFMP and Utility Rates Page 26 Total20172018201920202021Department20222023202420252026Project # 13175007 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000Admin Serv: Agenda Management System 150,00015,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,00015,000 13175008OR: Nature Center Fiber Relocation 25,00025,000 13175009 50,000Fire: Patient Contact System 50,000 13175010 10,000Police: BCA Encryption MACSEC 10,000 13185001Admin Serv: Financial / HR/Payroll App Replacement 200,000200,000 13185002 150,000Fire: Zuercher Mobile Solution 150,000 13185003Fire: Station Cameras / EOC in 2025 35,00010,000 15,000 10,000 13195001Admin Serv: Utility Billing App Replacement 203,000203,000 13205001 50,000Fire: VHF Paging Digital Upgrade 50,000 13995001 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000IR: On-going Software Licenses, Mtce, Development 2,500,000250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000250,000 13995002 125,000 75,000 90,000 90,000IR: On-going Network Adds & Replacement 920,00090,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,00090,000 13995003 200,000 75,000 50,000 210,000IR: On-going Hardware Adds & Replacement 1,010,00020,000 80,000 25,000 220,000 70,00060,000 13995004 93,000 100,000Police: 800 MHz Mobile Police Radios 293,000100,000 13995006 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000Police: Squad Computers / High Speed Service 550,000125,000 125,000 25,000 125,000 25,00025,000 13995007 75,000Fire / Police: Dispatch Voice Recorders 155,00080,000 13995009 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000IR / Communications: Reverse 911 - ParkAlert 150,00015,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,00015,000 13995010 25,000Eng: Engineering Total Station 25,000 13995011 46,998 46,998 55,001 55,002OR: Asset Mgmt Software 526,00746,998 55,002 55,002 55,002 55,00255,002 13995012 10,000 10,000Fire: Fire Department Mobiles Replacement 30,00010,000 13995013Police: EOC Computer / Phone Equipment Replacement 45,00015,000 15,000 15,000 13995015 205,000 210,125 220,763 226,282IR: Tablet / Smartphone Hardware and Services 2,296,695215,378 231,939 237,737 249,773 256,017243,681 13995016 19,000Facilities: City Hall Cameras 19,000 13995017 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000Admin Serv - Insight Budgeting Annual Maintenance 160,00016,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,00016,000 13995019 25,000OR: Nature Center Surveillance Cameras 25,000 13995021 23,000Police: Jail Cameras 46,00023,000 13995022 12,000Police: Exterior Cameras 24,00012,000 13995023 6,500Police: Booking and Intox Room Cameras (2) 13,0006,500 13995024 55,000Police: Dispatch Camera Viewing Workstations 110,00055,000 Monday, October 10, 2016Page 202017-2026 Draft Capital Improvement Plan Special Study Session Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Review of Proposed 2017 CIP, LRFMP and Utility Rates Page 27 Total20172018201920202021Department20222023202420252026Project # 10,751,5311,364,666 871,291 976,044 1,081,597 1,261,616Capital Replacement Fund 1,006,773 1,075,071 1,056,515 1,112,107 945,851 600,719113,511 39,687 40,921 42,217 43,578E-911 Funds 125,007 46,507 48,082 49,736 51,473 650,000250,000 200,000 200,000EDA Development Fund 2,725,000425,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 400,000G.O. Bonds 500,000 100,000 200,000 100,000 100,000 353,00067,000 43,000 25,000 11,000Park Improvement Fund 152,000 55,000 2,119,000236,000 347,500 249,500 165,000 43,000Police & Fire Pension 163,000 139,500 449,500 263,000 63,000 248,00616,333 16,333 77,333 19,001 19,001Sanitary Sewer Utility 19,001 19,001 24,001 19,001 19,001 13995025 27,000 43,000OR: Rec Center / Outdoor Rink Cameras 175,00062,000 43,000 13995026 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000IR: Surveillance Camera Maintenance 160,00016,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,00016,000 13995027OR: Point of Sale Equipment Replacements 30,00015,000 15,000 13995029 7,500 7,500IR: Plotter Replacements 37,5007,500 7,500 7,500 13995031OR: MSC Cameras 50,00025,000 25,000 13995035 125,000IR: Telephone Handset / Handless Upgrades 250,000125,000 13995036 10,000Eng: Large Scanner / Plotter / Copier 20,00010,000 13995037Fire: Stations A/V and EOC Presentation Equipment 100,000100,000 13995040Police: Interview Room Cameras 13,0006,500 6,500 13995041 10,000 10,000IR: Wireless Hotspot Additions / Replacements 50,00010,000 10,000 10,000 13995042 23,511 24,687 27,217 28,578Police: Zuercher CAD Module Annual Fees 295,71925,921 30,007 31,507 34,736 36,47333,082 13995043 40,000 100,000Police: Comm Van Upgrades / EOC Presentation Equip 260,000120,000 13995050 78,000Fire: 800 MHz Mobile Fire Radios 78,000 13995051 200,000SWLRT: Stations Technology 400,000200,000 13995052 25,000OR: Oak Hill Cameras / Security 50,00025,000 13995053 11,000OR: Park Shelter (Smaller) Camera Replacements 18,0007,000 13995054 15,000OR: Wolfe Park / Amphitheatre / Pool+ Wireless 20,0005,000 13995055 20,000Police: High Speed Cell Squad Modem Replacements 60,00020,000 20,000 13995056 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000Police: Specialized Dictation System 50,0005,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,0005,000 13995057 25,000IR: UHL Camera Servers Replacement 50,00025,000 61990001 22,000Police-LPR replacement 22,000 17,842,9212,489,509 1,944,810 2,052,797 1,527,481 1,797,862Technology Total 1,985,448 1,464,746 1,817,765 1,563,511 1,198,992 Monday, October 10, 2016Page 212017-2026 Draft Capital Improvement Plan Special Study Session Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Review of Proposed 2017 CIP, LRFMP and Utility Rates Page 28 Total20172018201920202021Department20222023202420252026Project # 60,00055,000Solid Waste Utility 5,000 72,67066766756,667 667 667Stormwater Utility 667 667 10,667 667 667 262,99516,332 26,332 72,332 18,999 19,000Water Utility 19,000 29,000 24,000 19,000 19,000 17,842,9212,489,509 1,944,810 2,052,797 1,527,481 1,797,862Technology Total 1,985,448 1,464,746 1,817,765 1,563,511 1,198,992 29,176,152 41,401,435 42,400,202 24,438,991 18,952,541Grand Total 234,001,54822,406,646 15,246,513 14,305,177 12,350,092 13,323,799 Monday, October 10, 2016Page 222017-2026 Draft Capital Improvement Plan Special Study Session Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Review of Proposed 2017 CIP, LRFMP and Utility Rates Page 29 CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARKPROJECT LIST FOR 2015 ‐ 2023AS OF 9‐27‐16Project NumberProject NameStatus CIP 201620172018201920202021 OPENING YEAR20222023 TOTALSGeneral SWLRT Contribution for Project AdvancementCommitted Yes500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 2,000,000$ Louisiana Underpass TrailCommitted Yes78,000 220,000 298,000$ Lynn Ave. Extension - Backage roadway and ROWCommitted Yes72,230 1,591,428 1,663,658$ Wooddale Trail Bridge StairsCommitted Yes43,800 43,800$ Beltline Trail Bridge StairsCommitted Yes165,000 165,000$ LRCI #33 - Trail (Louisiana to Wooddale)Committed Yes101,617 746,971 848,588$ 40199001LRCI #17 - Xenwood UnderpassCommitted Yes 382,607 382,607$ 40199002LRCI #32 - CSAH 25 @ Beltline BlvdCommitted Yes 133,943 925,040 1,058,983$ 40199003Regional Trail Bridge UpgradesCommitted Yes 24,649 500,000 524,649$ 40199004Whistle Quiet Zone @ Wooddale and BeltlineCommitted Yes100,000 100,000$ 40199005Park and Ride Ramp at Beltline BoulevardCommitted Yes 1,613,264 725,004 2,338,268$ 40199006Wooddale Avenue Bridge WideningCommitted Yes 1,200,000 1,000,000 2,200,000$ 40199007Fiber/Technology for SWLRTCommitted Yes 200,000 200,000 400,000$ 793,046$ 1,700,000$ 7,505,503$ 1,425,004$ 600,000$ -$ -$ -$ 12,023,553$ Ottawa Ave. - (CSAH 5 to CSAH 25)1 WLTD750,000 750,000$ CSAH 25 Urban Blvd. - Hwy 100 to France Ave (City Limits) 1 WLTD2,500,000 2,500,000 5,000,000$ Beltline Station. - Opening Day - TSAAP 2 WLTD3,000,000 3,100,000 6,100,000$ Louisiana Station - Opening Day - TSAAP 2 WLTD1,600,000 1,500,000 3,100,000$ Wooddale Station - Opening Day - TSAAP 2 WLTD1,500,000 1,500,000$ Beltline Boulevard/36th St. Intersection Improvement 2 WLTD750,000 750,000$ South Wye Removal 3 WLTD1,500,000 1,500,000 3,000,000$ Pedestrian Walk to Hospital 3 WLTD2,000,000 2,000,000$ Beltline Station -Beyond Opening Day - TSAAP 4 WLTD1,200,000 1,200,000$ Louisiana Station - Beyond Opening Day - TSAAP 4 WLTD2,000,000 2,100,000 2,000,000 6,100,000$ Wooddale Station - Beyond Opening Day - TSAAP 4 WLTD3,200,000 2,000,000 5,200,000$ Extension of Pk. Glen Blvd. to 36th St. 4 WLTD2,500,000 2,500,000$ -$ -$ -$ 9,350,000$ 9,350,000$ 6,700,000$ 7,800,000$ 4,000,000$ 37,200,000$ 793,046$ 1,700,000$ 7,505,503$ 10,775,004$ 9,950,000$ 6,700,000$ 7,800,000$ 4,000,000$ 49,223,553$ Update 9/27/16 to reflect Plan It budgeting40199000TOTAL - ALL PROJECTS:TOTAL - COMMITTED PROJECTS:TOTAL - "WOULD LIKE TO DO" PROJECTS:\\sl‐fs1\data$\CITYWIDE\SHARE\SWLRT\CIP\20160927_SWLRT CIP10/10/20165:37 PMSpecial Study Session Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Review of Proposed 2017 CIP, LRFMP and Utility RatesPage 30 10/10/2016Revenue Inflation3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%Interest Earnings1.75%1.50%1.50%1.50%1.50%1.50%1.50%1.50%1.50%1.50%1.50%1.50%Personal Services2.00%2.50%2.50%2.50%2.50%2.75%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%Non-personnel Inflation3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026Page #Actual Revised Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected ProjectedFranchise Agreement Ends in 20217 Cable TV Fund - Produces and broadcasts all cable tv programming for cable channels 14, 15, 16, 17 & 96Total Revenues717,757.65$ 695,990.04$ 670,950.00$ 688,376.59$ 689,444.42$ 690,410.73$ 21,038.38$ 11,951.01$ 181.67$ (9,210.34)$ (19,025.08)$ (29,277.33)$ Total Expenditures707,920 955,733 720,066 619,145 627,039 650,644 629,001 798,776 628,585 647,442 666,865 686,871 Incr/(Decr) in Fund Balance 9,837.33$ (259,742.96)$ (49,116.04)$ 69,231.59$ 62,405.22$ 39,766.85$ (607,962.82)$ (786,825.22)$ (628,402.85)$ (656,652.40)$ (685,890.39)$ (716,148.61)$ Fund Balance - Ending 1,617,838$ 1,358,095$ 1,308,979$ 1,378,211$ 1,440,616$ 1,480,383$ 872,420$ 85,595$ (542,808)$ (1,199,460)$ (1,885,351)$ (2,601,499)$ Fund Balance Percentage205.18% 188.61% 211.42% 219.80% 221.41% 235.35% 109.22% 13.62% -83.84% -179.87% -274.48% -367.71%8 Police & Fire Pension Fund - The overfunded portion of these pension accounts used for capital needs and certain personnel costs related to police or fire Total Revenues13,308.17$ 42,694.54$ 24,972.52$ 21,265.59$ 16,200.56$ 12,524.41$ 10,055.32$ 9,373.74$ 6,876.30$ 4,688.12$ (2,188.85)$ (6,377.62)$ Total Expenditures356,562 1,224,163 272,101 358,934 261,277 177,130 55,494 175,869 152,755 463,153 277,063 77,484 Incr/(Decr) in Fund Balance(343,253.68)$ (1,181,468.20)$ (247,128.56)$ (337,668.52)$ (245,076.57)$ (164,606.03)$ (45,439.03)$ (166,495.45)$ (145,878.96)$ (458,464.80)$ (279,251.36)$ (83,862.00)$ Fund Balance - Ending2,837,660$ 1,656,192$ 1,409,063$ 1,071,394$ 826,318$ 661,712$ 616,273$ 449,777$ 303,898$ (154,566)$ (433,818)$ (517,680)$ Fund Balance Percentage388.10%608.67%392.57%410.06%466.50%1192.39%350.42%294.44%65.62%-55.79%-559.88%-3469.96%9 Housing Rehabilitation Fund - Primarily covers costs for programs related to maintaining quality and diverse housing stock within the City.Total Revenues2,607,010.00$ 1,507,785.00$ 1,494,500.00$ 1,498,357.31$ 1,478,621.51$ 1,455,886.30$ 1,434,376.07$ 1,411,680.50$ 1,296,878.35$ 1,071,282.21$ 1,045,738.10$ 1,018,837.91$ Total Expenditures961,588 1,404,266 1,522,605 1,530,602 1,537,857 1,545,518 1,563,688 1,571,246 1,528,365 1,245,538 1,251,852 1,262,957 Incr/(Decr) in Cash Balance1,645,421.78$ 103,519.00$ (28,105.00)$ (32,244.85)$ (59,235.94)$ (89,631.70)$ (129,312.05)$ (159,565.92)$ (231,486.39)$ (174,255.90)$ (206,113.82)$ (244,118.83)$ Cash Available at Year End 1,734,309$ 1,910,867$ 1,882,762$ 1,850,518$ 1,791,282$ 1,701,650$ 1,572,338$ 1,412,772$ 1,181,286$ 1,007,030$ 800,916$ 556,797$ Cash Available Percentage123.50% 125.50% 123.01% 120.33% 115.90% 108.82% 100.07% 92.44% 94.84% 80.44% 63.42% 39.00%11 Development Fund - This fund is to be used for general City or EDA projects.Total Revenues6,189,272.81$ 2,383,125.00$ 8,185,285.00$ 1,205,302.14$ 1,211,725.04$ 1,216,310.35$ 1,211,977.88$ 1,212,532.03$ 1,208,285.67$ 1,203,007.28$ 1,195,138.17$ 1,186,756.39$ Total Expenditures3,693,932 2,752,340 5,797,991 2,817,490 2,778,761 2,617,336 2,158,616 2,201,136 2,244,930 2,290,039 2,336,501 2,384,357 Incr/(Decr) in Fund Balance2,495,340.39$ (369,215.00)$ 2,387,294.00$ (1,612,187.39)$ (1,567,035.62)$ (1,401,025.22)$ (946,638.51)$ (988,603.62)$ (1,036,644.80)$ (1,087,031.86)$ (1,141,362.91)$ (1,197,600.49)$ Cash Available at Year End 10,236,497$ 12,249,832$ 16,221,781$ 16,252,639$ 16,149,072$ 15,438,708$ 15,041,472$ 14,311,178$ 13,498,666$ 12,499,620$ 11,452,162$ 11,450,996$ Cash Available Percentage546.25% 211.28% 575.75% 584.89% 617.00% 715.21% 683.35% 637.49% 589.45% 534.97% 480.30% 470.53%Special Study Session Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Review of Proposed 2017 CIP, LRFMP and Utility RatesPage 31 10/10/2016201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026Page #Actual Budgeted Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected12 HRA Levy - This fund is to be used for infrastructure construction in redevelopment areas and qualifying housing programs.Total Revenues941,359.93$ 1,011,427.00$ 1,086,461.00$ 1,086,461.00$ 1,086,461.00$ 1,090,066.69$ 1,090,958.75$ 1,107,044.19$ 1,123,362.55$ 1,139,917.06$ 1,156,711.01$ 1,173,747.73$ Total Expenditures149,391 1,956,373 1,086,461 1,086,461 846,081 1,030,596 18,596 19,154 19,728 20,320 20,930 21,558 Incr/(Decr) in Fund Balance791,968.60$ (944,946.00)$ (0.23)$ 0.10$ 240,379.56$ 59,470.40$ 1,072,362.83$ 1,087,890.40$ 1,103,634.14$ 1,119,596.80$ 1,135,781.14$ 1,152,189.96$ Fund Balance - Ending (3,657,675)$ (2,800,491)$ (1,814,690)$ (799,825)$ 244,975$ 304,445$ 1,376,808$ 2,464,698$ 3,568,333$ 4,687,929$ 5,823,710$ 6,975,900$ Fund Balance Percentage-378.63% -257.76% -167.03% -94.53% 23.77% 1637.16% 7188.17% 12493.14% 17560.47% 22398.28% 27014.45% 31416.61%13 Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund - Provides cash flow for project construction and is repaid through reimbursements from Municipal State Aid (MSA), or special assessments. Total Revenues257,431.88$ 288,825.48$ 130,952.77$ 123,399.84$ 107,028.15$ 95,466.08$ 64,911.41$ 63,122.82$ 56,591.36$ 49,555.38$ 48,475.77$ 39,598.27$ Total Expenditures531,613 100,974 104,003 107,123 110,337 113,647 117,056 120,568 124,185 127,910 131,748 135,700 Incr/(Decr) in Fund Balance(274,180.90)$ 187,851.85$ 26,949.93$ 16,276.92$ (3,308.46)$ (18,180.63)$ (52,144.71)$ (57,444.97)$ (67,593.47)$ (78,354.99)$ (83,271.92)$ (96,101.85)$ Fund Balance - Ending 2,337,942$ 2,525,794$ 2,552,744$ 2,569,021$ 2,565,712$ 2,547,532$ 2,495,387$ 2,437,942$ 2,370,348$ 2,291,994$ 2,208,722$ 2,112,620$ Fund Balance Percentage2315.40% 2428.58% 2383.00% 2328.35% 2257.62% 2176.33% 2069.70% 1963.16% 1853.13% 1739.68% 1627.65% 1511.49%14 Park Improvement Fund - This fund is responsible for financing capital expenditures within City parks and improvement of park facilitiesTotal Revenues1,651,050.99$ 13,018,710.75$ 1,401,805.70$ 1,477,652.72$ 1,668,268.95$ 1,867,979.67$ 1,968,214.84$ 1,970,100.71$ 1,971,315.20$ 1,976,761.19$ 1,976,609.91$ 1,981,037.93$ Total Expenditures1,544,069 15,215,381 2,451,427 2,212,510 1,800,105 1,968,229 1,961,896 2,012,122 1,734,926 2,117,324 1,816,334 2,151,974 Incr/(Decr) in Fund Balance106,982.33$ (2,196,670.18)$ (1,049,621.66)$ (734,857.46)$ (131,836.53)$ (100,248.98)$ 6,319.33$ (42,021.66)$ 236,389.15$ (140,562.64)$ 160,276.37$ (170,935.62)$ Cash Available at Year End 4,253,650$ 2,056,980$ 1,007,358$ 272,501$ 140,664$ 40,415$ 46,735$ 4,713$ 241,102$ 100,539$ 260,816$ 89,880$ Cash Available Percentage56.96% 83.91% 45.53% 15.14% 7.15% 2.06% 2.32% 0.27% 11.39% 5.54% 12.12% 11.75%15 Pavement Management Fund - Funds expenditures are used for pavement rehabilitation within the City.Total Revenues3,003,720.75$ 2,338,288.34$ 3,096,418.38$ 3,126,054.54$ 3,957,146.92$ 4,027,260.84$ 4,090,755.53$ 4,153,826.54$ 4,227,876.77$ 4,295,907.32$ 4,365,816.81$ 4,449,024.53$ Total Expenditures2,050,904 2,311,714 5,076,793 3,676,651 3,439,283 4,054,589 4,252,837 3,693,130 4,280,392 4,337,857 3,638,782 3,982,750 Incr/(Decr) in Fund Balance952,817.01$ 26,573.93$ (1,980,375.10)$ (550,596.77)$ 517,864.02$ (27,328.45)$ (162,081.05)$ 460,696.70$ (52,515.46)$ (41,949.61)$ 727,034.67$ 466,274.43$ Fund Balance - Ending 2,039,178$ 2,065,752$ 85,377$ (465,220)$ 52,644$ 25,316$ (136,765)$ 323,931$ 271,416$ 229,466$ 956,501$ 1,422,775$ Fund Balance Percentage92.69% 40.69% 2.32% -13.53% 1.30% 0.60% -3.70% 7.57% 6.26% 6.31% 24.02% 2740.74%16 Sidewalks and Trails- This fund accounts for revenues and expenditures related to the the enhancement of the City's sidewalks and trails system.Total Revenues1,565,695.38$ 38,573.42$ 6,023,890.67$ 766,098.59$ 8,726,203.93$ 1,424,922.16$ 9,608,413.94$ 2,202,837.88$ 2,107,444.46$ 2,106,048.42$ 2,104,631.20$ 2,103,192.49$ Total Expenditures1,951,889 1,017,423 3,210,029 3,425,742 8,811,656 2,525,470 3,313,485 8,562,399 2,200,514 2,200,530 2,200,545 2,200,562 Incr/(Decr) in Fund Balance(386,193.62)$ (978,849.81)$ 2,813,861.18$ (2,659,643.79)$ (85,451.72)$ (1,100,547.74)$ 6,294,929.36$ (6,359,561.23)$ (93,069.63)$ (94,481.09)$ (95,914.19)$ (97,369.27)$ Fund Balance - Ending 2,581,015$ 1,602,165$ 4,416,026$ 1,756,382$ 1,670,931$ 570,383$ 6,865,312$ 505,751$ 412,681$ 318,200$ 222,286$ 124,917$ Fund Balance Percentage230.69% 49.91% 128.91% 19.93% 66.16% 17.21% 80.18% 22.98% 18.75% 14.46% 10.10% 5.95%Special Study Session Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Review of Proposed 2017 CIP, LRFMP and Utility RatesPage 32 10/10/2016201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026Page #Actual Budgeted Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected17 Capital Replacement Fund - Funds technology, buildings, and equipment capital expenditures. Also combines Fire Station Bond Fund (4040)Total Revenues3,732,592.87$ 4,136,378.11$ 3,781,486.96$ 3,816,585.84$ 14,866,744.81$ 3,380,933.33$ 3,423,209.65$ 3,474,858.11$ 3,520,002.65$ 3,578,013.32$ 3,648,885.46$ 3,722,956.40$ Total Expenditures4,867,973 3,293,363 4,319,099 3,436,519 13,942,023 3,706,875 3,218,673 3,801,077 3,088,555 2,392,212 2,356,001 3,130,685 Incr/(Decr) in Fund Balance(1,135,379.63)$ 843,015.36$ (537,612.24)$ 380,066.95$ 924,721.93$ (325,941.84)$ 204,536.82$ (326,218.77)$ 431,447.27$ 1,185,800.96$ 1,292,884.59$ 592,271.45$ Cash Available at Year End 359,727$ 1,202,742$ 665,130$ 1,045,197$ 1,969,919$ 1,643,977$ 1,848,514$ 1,522,295$ 1,953,743$ 3,139,543$ 4,432,428$ 5,024,700$ Cash Available Percentage10.01% 27.85% 19.35% 7.50% 53.14% 51.08% 48.63% 49.29% 81.67% 133.26% 141.58% 262706.70%18 Water Utility Fund - Accounts for all provisions of water services including administration, billing and collection, Reilly, maintenance, operations and capital.Total Revenues5,803,991.49$ 6,231,669.00$ 11,798,846.14$ 7,278,345.60$ 12,652,595.78$ 8,117,949.59$ 8,539,162.94$ 8,977,523.25$ 13,384,212.06$ 9,872,692.19$ 10,322,653.16$ 10,800,702.90$ Total Expenditures5,770,534 6,885,183 8,630,927 8,746,510 9,630,730 9,717,293 10,774,550 9,662,334 10,004,979 10,519,514 10,627,871 10,533,089 Incr/(Decr) in Fund Balance33,457.15$ (653,514.15)$ 3,167,918.74$ (1,468,164.10)$ 3,021,865.90$ (1,599,343.66)$ (2,235,387.52)$ (684,810.73)$ 3,379,233.40$ (646,821.90)$ (305,218.21)$ 267,614.36$ Fund Balance - Ending 5,146,517$ 4,493,003$ 7,660,922$ 6,192,758$ 9,214,624$ 7,615,280$ 5,379,892$ 4,695,082$ 8,074,315$ 7,427,493$ 7,122,275$ 7,389,889$ Fund Balance Percentage57.70% 52.06% 87.59% 64.30% 94.83% 70.68% 55.68% 46.93% 76.76% 69.89% 67.62% 99.10%Qtrly Fixed Fee Increase (3/4" meter) 2.44$ 2.44$ 2.44$ 2.44$ 2.44$ 2.44$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Percent Usage Fee Increase 4% 7% 7% 7% 6% 6% 6% 6% 5% 5% 5% 5%19 Sewer Utility Fund - This fund is to be used for all provisions of sewer services including administration, billing and collection, maintenance, operations and capital.Total Revenues6,117,307.30$ 6,444,588.00$ 8,690,560.19$ 7,449,945.32$ 7,894,459.10$ 8,210,894.95$ 8,462,224.92$ 8,721,788.98$ 8,903,220.53$ 9,087,151.02$ 9,274,154.73$ 9,473,656.91$ Total Expenditures6,295,163 8,048,118 7,065,303 7,477,134 7,779,470 7,836,449 8,030,267 8,235,192 8,482,900 8,699,500 8,295,595 8,533,108 Incr/(Decr) in Fund Balance(177,855.26)$ (1,603,529.63)$ 1,625,256.98$ (27,189.05)$ 114,989.10$ 374,446.02$ 431,957.85$ 486,596.71$ 420,320.38$ 387,650.88$ 978,559.62$ 940,548.98$ Fund Balance - Ending 6,527,721$ 4,924,191$ 6,549,448$ 6,522,259$ 6,637,248$ 7,011,694$ 7,443,652$ 7,930,249$ 8,350,569$ 8,738,220$ 9,716,780$ 10,657,329$ Fund Balance Percentage87.34% 69.70% 87.59% 83.84% 84.70% 87.32% 90.39% 93.49% 95.99% 105.34% 113.87% 141.91%Percentage Rate Increase 4.50% 8.00% 7.00% 7.00% 6.00% 4.00% 3.00% 3.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00%20 Solid Waste Utility Fund - Accounts for all provisions of revenues and expenses related to the collection, disposal and recycling of residential solid waste.Total Revenues3,318,776.30$ 3,417,200.00$ 3,500,350.40$ 3,613,539.08$ 3,782,333.84$ 3,960,365.00$ 4,149,236.94$ 4,348,668.10$ 4,559,240.78$ 4,781,568.31$ 5,016,221.70$ 5,264,030.20$ Total Expenditures3,122,560 3,521,869 3,889,441 3,982,209 4,116,223 4,181,561 4,307,008 4,436,219 4,569,305 4,711,384 4,847,576 4,993,003 Incr/(Decr) in Fund Balance196,216.35$ (104,668.82)$ (389,090.93)$ (368,669.67)$ (333,888.99)$ (221,196.42)$ (157,771.32)$ (87,550.40)$ (10,064.28)$ 70,184.09$ 168,645.96$ 271,027.19$ Fund Balance - Ending 2,597,847$ 2,493,178$ 2,104,087$ 1,735,418$ 1,401,529$ 1,180,332$ 1,022,561$ 935,011$ 924,946$ 995,130$ 1,163,776$ 1,434,804$ Fund Balance Percentage73.76% 64.10% 52.84% 42.16% 33.52% 27.40% 23.05% 20.46% 19.63% 20.53% 23.31% 27.98%Percentage Rate Increase 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00%21 Storm Water Utility Fund - This fund is to be used for all provisions of storm water including administration, billing and collection, maintenance, operations and capital.Total Revenues2,488,189.52$ 2,741,638.00$ 2,820,572.88$ 2,871,909.31$ 2,943,341.26$ 2,980,172.15$ 3,013,920.88$ 3,052,994.78$ 3,056,084.85$ 3,057,865.04$ 3,060,496.98$ 3,069,870.97$ Total Expenditures2,197,588 3,057,715 4,040,776 2,868,476 2,439,014 2,700,833 2,399,277 2,846,990 2,937,406 2,882,402 2,435,564 2,383,561 Incr/(Decr) in Fund Balance290,601.78$ (316,077.48)$ (1,220,203.22)$ 3,432.86$ 504,327.03$ 279,338.74$ 614,644.28$ 206,004.35$ 118,679.32$ 175,462.85$ 624,932.74$ 686,309.81$ Fund Balance - Ending 15,067,791$ 14,751,713$ 13,531,510$ 13,534,943$ 14,039,270$ 14,318,609$ 14,933,253$ 15,139,257$ 15,257,937$ 15,433,399$ 16,058,332$ 16,744,642$ Fund Balance Percentage 331.85% 365.07% 471.73% 554.93% 519.81% 596.79% 524.53% 515.40% 529.35% 633.67% 673.71% 679.85%Percentage Rate Increase 10.00% 10.00% 2.50% 2.50% 2.50% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%Rate- residential qtrly 19.36$ 21.30$ 21.83$ 22.37$ 22.93$ 23.16$ 23.39$ 23.63$ 23.63$ 23.63$ 23.63$ 23.63$ 22 Benefits Administration Fund - This fund covers the cost of insurance, unemployment, flex leave payouts, and tuition reimbursement.Total Revenues498,564.18$ 270,000.00$ 268,818.19$ 364,683.00$ 411,708.75$ 459,156.35$ 507,025.41$ 555,315.36$ 604,025.39$ 653,154.47$ 702,701.34$ 752,664.50$ Total Cash Outflows517,656 526,451 544,498 562,966 581,869 601,219 621,029 641,313 662,087 683,363 705,157 727,486 Incr/(Decr) in Fund Balance(19,091.54)$ (256,450.52)$ (275,679.51)$ (198,283.31)$ (170,160.21)$ (142,062.36)$ (114,003.52)$ (85,998.11)$ (58,061.16)$ (30,208.34)$ (2,456.02)$ 25,178.75$ Cash Available at Year End844,330$ 587,879$ 312,200$ 113,917$ (56,244)$ (198,306)$ (312,309)$ (398,308)$ (456,369)$ (486,577)$ (489,033)$ (463,854)$ Cash Available Percentage160.38%107.97%55.46%19.58%-9.35%-31.93%-48.70%-60.16%-66.78%-69.00%-67.22%-61.82%23 Uninsured Loss Fund - This fund covers self-insured workers comp claims, property and liability claim deductibles that are underwritten by the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust.Total Revenues245,408.76$ 182,000.00$ 190,419.90$ 195,908.12$ 201,559.91$ 207,380.21$ 213,372.94$ 219,542.01$ 225,892.67$ 232,430.32$ 239,160.51$ 246,088.97$ Total Expenditures279,897 179,794 185,039 190,437 195,994 201,794 207,847 214,083 220,505 227,120 233,934 240,952 Incr/(Decr) in Fund Balance(34,488.33)$ 2,206.00$ 5,381.05$ 5,470.80$ 5,565.98$ 5,586.68$ 5,525.59$ 5,459.25$ 5,387.43$ 5,309.92$ 5,226.50$ 5,136.94$ Fund Balance - Ending738,674$ 740,880$ 746,261$ 751,731$ 757,297$ 762,884$ 768,410$ 773,869$ 779,256$ 784,566$ 789,793$ 794,930$ Fund Balance Percentage410.84%400.39%391.87%383.55%375.28%367.04%358.93%350.95%343.10%335.38%327.78%320.30%Special Study Session Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Review of Proposed 2017 CIP, LRFMP and Utility RatesPage 33 Financial Management PlanCable TV Fund - Produces and broadcasts all cable tv programming for cable channels 14, 15, 16, 17 & 962015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Actual Revised Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected ProjectedRevenuesCharges for Services679,796 650,000 670,000 670,000 670,000 670,000 - - - - - - Interest Income6,903 14,000 - 17,398 18,437 19,373 19,969 10,850 (953) (10,379) (20,229) (30,517) Miscellaneous/ Other Revenue31,058 31,990 950 979 1,008 1,038 1,069 1,101 1,134 1,168 1,203 1,240 Transfers In- Total Revenues717,758$ 695,990$ 670,950$ 688,377$ 689,444$ 690,411$ 21,038$ 11,951$ 182$ (9,210)$ (19,025)$ (29,277)$ ExpendituresPersonal Services439,069 436,913 445,068 456,195 467,600 480,459 494,872 509,718 525,010 540,760 556,983 573,693 Supplies2,649 2,500 2,500 2,575 2,652 2,732 2,814 2,898 2,985 3,075 3,167 3,262 Non-Capital Equipment105,065 100 100 103 106 109 113 116 119 123 127 130 Services & Other Charges14,469 82,964 84,142 86,666 89,266 91,944 94,703 97,544 100,470 103,484 106,589 109,786 Capital Outlay12,162 323,750 103,750 14,100 32,909 75,400 36,500 188,500 - - - - Transfers Out134,506 109,506 84,506 59,506 34,506 - - - - - - - Total Expenditures707,920$ 955,733$ 720,066$ 619,145$ 627,039$ 650,644$ 629,001$ 798,776$ 628,585$ 647,442$ 666,865$ 686,871$ Incr/(Decr) in Fund Balance9,837$ (259,743)$ (49,116)$ 69,232$ 62,405$ 39,767$ (607,963)$ (786,825)$ (628,403)$ (656,652)$ (685,890)$ (716,149)$ Fund Balance - Beginning1,608,000$ 1,617,838$ 1,358,095$ 1,308,979$ 1,378,211$ 1,440,616$ 1,480,383$ 872,420$ 85,595$ (542,808)$ (1,199,460)$ (1,885,351)$ Fund Balance - Ending1,617,838$ 1,358,095$ 1,308,979$ 1,378,211$ 1,440,616$ 1,480,383$ 872,420$ 85,595$ (542,808)$ (1,199,460)$ (1,885,351)$ (2,601,499)$ Fund Balance Percentage205.18% 188.61% 211.42% 219.80% 221.41% 235.35% 109.22% 13.62% -83.84% -179.87% -274.48% -367.71%Cash Available at Year End1,468,732$ 1,208,989$ 1,159,872$ 1,229,104$ 1,291,509$ 1,331,276$ 723,313$ (63,512)$ (691,915)$ (1,348,567)$ (2,034,458)$ (2,750,606)$ Cash Available Percentage153.68% 167.90% 187.33% 196.02% 198.50% 211.65% 90.55% -10.10% -106.87% -202.22% -296.19% -388.79%Target Cash Balance - Page 7Updated 10/10/2016Special Study Session Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Review of Proposed 2017 CIP, LRFMP and Utility RatesPage 34 Financial Management PlanPolice & Fire Pension Fund - The overfunded portion of these pension accounts used for capital needs and certain personnel costs related to police or fire 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Actual Revised Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected ProjectedRevenuesIntergovernmental- - - - - - - - - - - Interest Income13,308 42,695 24,973 21,266 16,201 12,524 10,055 9,374 6,876 4,688 (2,189) (6,378) Miscellaneous/ Other Revenue- - - - - - - - - - - - Transfers InTotal Revenues13,308$ 42,695$ 24,973$ 21,266$ 16,201$ 12,524$ 10,055$ 9,374$ 6,876$ 4,688$ (2,189)$ (6,378)$ ExpendituresNon-Capital Equipment8,526 8,526 8,782 9,045 9,317 9,596 9,884 10,180 10,486 10,800 11,124 11,458 Services & Other Charges2,252 2,252 2,319 2,389 2,461 2,534 2,610 2,689 2,769 2,852 2,938 3,026 Capital Outlay304,882 713,385 261,000 347,500 249,500 165,000 43,000 163,000 139,500 449,500 263,000 63,000 Transfers Out40,902 500,000 - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenditures356,562$ 1,224,163$ 272,101$ 358,934$ 261,277$ 177,130$ 55,494$ 175,869$ 152,755$ 463,153$ 277,063$ 77,484$ Incr/(Decr) in Fund Balance(343,254)$ (1,181,468)$ (247,129)$ (337,669)$ (245,077)$ (164,606)$ (45,439)$ (166,495)$ (145,879)$ (458,465)$ (279,251)$ (83,862)$ Fund Balance - Beginning3,180,914$ 2,837,660$ 1,656,192$ 1,409,063$ 1,071,394$ 826,318$ 661,712$ 616,273$ 449,777$ 303,898$ (154,566)$ (433,818)$ Fund Balance - Ending2,837,660$ 1,656,192$ 1,409,063$ 1,071,394$ 826,318$ 661,712$ 616,273$ 449,777$ 303,898$ (154,566)$ (433,818)$ (517,680)$ Fund Balance Percentage388.10% 608.67% 392.57% 410.06% 466.50% 1192.39% 350.42% 294.44% 65.62%-55.79% -559.88% -3469.96%Cash Available at Year End2,846,303$ 1,664,834$ 1,417,706$ 1,080,037$ 834,961$ 670,355$ 624,916$ 458,420$ 312,541$ (145,923)$ (425,175)$ (509,037)$ Cash Available Percentage389.28% 611.84% 394.98% 413.37% 471.38% 1207.97% 355.33% 300.10% 67.48% -52.67% -548.72% -3412.02%Target Cash Balance - Page 8Updated 10/10/2016Special Study Session Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Review of Proposed 2017 CIP, LRFMP and Utility RatesPage 35 Financial Management PlanHousing Rehabilitation Fund - Primarily covers costs for programs related to maintaining quality and diverse housing stock within the City.2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Actual Revised Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected ProjectedProgram RevenuesGeneral Property Taxes/HRA Levy100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Charges for Services6,315 3,000 3,000 3,090 3,183 3,278 3,377 3,478 3,582 3,690 3,800 3,914 Interest Income(744) 3,000 2,000 28,241 27,758 26,869 25,525 23,585 21,192 17,719 15,105 12,014 Miscellaneous/ Other Revenue6,902 3,325 4,500 4,635 4,774 4,917 5,065 5,217 5,373 5,534 5,700 5,871 1/8% Bond Fee572,447 567,000 570,000 547,093 527,609 505,524 485,112 464,103 442,433 420,041 396,834 372,740 Transfers In1,000,000 - - - - - - - - - - - TIF Reimbursement125,400 129,162 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 - - - Total Revenues1,810,320$ 805,487$ 804,500$ 808,059$ 788,324$ 765,588$ 744,078$ 721,382$ 697,580$ 546,984$ 521,440$ 494,540$ Program ExpendituresHousing RehabPersonal Services300,300 262,689 276,830 283,751 290,845 298,843 307,808 317,042 326,554 336,350 346,441 356,834 Supplies18 - - - - - - - - - Services & Other Charges84,512 5,965 3,762 3,875 3,991 4,111 4,234 4,361 4,492 4,627 4,766 4,909 Transfers Out8,185 8,185 8,431 8,683 8,944 9,212 9,489 9,773 10,067 10,369 10,680 HIA Admin1,062 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Excess Public Land116 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Move-up Program36,835 41,000 42,000 42,000 42,000 42,000 42,000 42,000 42,000 42,000 42,000 42,000 Live Where You Work Prgm1,600 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 Green Remodeling Program37,610 42,000 43,000 43,000 43,000 43,000 43,000 43,000 43,000 43,000 43,000 43,000 Neighborhood Association Grant27,178 54,000 54,000 54,000 54,000 54,000 54,000 54,000 54,000 54,000 54,000 54,000 Neighborhood Public Art28,200 - - - - - - - - - - Step Contributions45,900 46,818 47,754 48,709 49,684 50,677 51,691 52,725 53,779 54,855 CES Reside Energy Conservation6,210 - - - - - - - - - - Transformation Loan39,318 175,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 Discount Loan Program19,202 40,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 Page 1Updated 10/10/2016Special Study Session Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Review of Proposed 2017 CIP, LRFMP and Utility RatesPage 36 Financial Management PlanLand Trust (WHALT)20,000 50,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 Foreclosure Initiative10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 PPL LA CRT/ Shallow Rent Subsid3,500 10,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 Total Expenditures623,845$ 712,654$ 835,677$ 843,874$ 852,273$ 861,607$ 871,938$ 882,569$ 893,510$ 904,768$ 916,354$ 928,277$ Programs Beginning Cash Balance (146,882) 1,039,593 1,132,426 1,101,249 1,065,434 1,001,484 905,465 777,605 616,418 420,489 62,705 (332,209) Incr/(Decr) in Cash Balance1,186,475$ 92,833$ (31,177)$ (35,815)$ (63,950)$ (96,019)$ (127,860)$ (161,187)$ (195,929)$ (357,784)$ (394,914)$ (433,737)$ Programs Ending Cash Balance 1,039,593 1,132,426 1,101,249 1,065,434 1,001,484 905,465 777,605 616,418 420,489 62,705 (332,209) (765,946) HIA RevenuesSpecial Assessments796,690 702,298 690,000 690,298 690,298 690,298 690,298 690,298 599,298 524,298 524,298 524,298 Interfund Loans (Development Fund)Total Revenues796,690$ 702,298$ 690,000$ 690,298$ 690,298$ 690,298$ 690,298$ 690,298$ 599,298$ 524,298$ 524,298$ 524,298$ HIA ExpendituresGreensboro HIA130 Debt Service337,613 341,612 336,928 336,728 335,584 333,911 341,750 338,677 334,855 340,770 335,498 334,680 Interfund Loans Payments- 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 300,000 - - - Total Expenditures337,743$ 691,612$ 686,928$ 686,728$ 685,584$ 683,911$ 691,750$ 688,677$ 634,855$ 340,770$ 335,498$ 334,680$ Programs Beginning Cash Balance 308,809 767,756 778,442 781,514 785,084 789,798 796,185 794,733 796,354 760,797 944,325 1,133,125 Incr/(Decr) in Cash Balance458,947$ 10,686$ 3,072$ 3,570$ 4,714$ 6,387$ (1,452)$ 1,621$ (35,557)$ 183,528$ 188,800$ 189,618$ Programs Ending Cash Balance 767,756 778,442 781,514 785,084 789,798 796,185 794,733 796,354 760,797 944,325 1,133,125 1,322,743 Fund Balance - Beginning1,095,601$ 2,743,860$ 3,197,379$ 3,519,274$ 3,837,030$ 4,127,794$ 4,388,162$ 4,608,850$ 4,799,284$ 4,867,798$ 4,693,542$ 4,487,428$ Fund Balance - Ending2,743,860$ 3,197,379$ 3,519,274$ 3,837,030$ 4,127,794$ 4,388,162$ 4,608,850$ 4,799,284$ 4,867,798$ 4,693,542$ 4,487,428$ 4,243,309$ Fund Balance Percentage385.02% 382.61% 417.04% 450.21% 479.08% 503.27% 522.21% 537.13% 538.02% 512.20% 483.41% 451.68%Cash Available at Year End1,734,309$ 1,910,867$ 1,882,762$ 1,850,518$ 1,791,282$ 1,701,650$ 1,572,338$ 1,412,772$ 1,181,286$ 1,007,030$ 800,916$ 556,797$ Cash Available Percentage123.50% 125.50% 123.01%120.33% 115.90% 108.82% 100.07% 92.44% 94.84% 80.44% 63.42% 39.00%Target Cash Balance - Page 2Updated 10/10/2016Special Study Session Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Review of Proposed 2017 CIP, LRFMP and Utility RatesPage 37 Financial Management PlanDevelopment Fund - This fund is to be used for general City or EDA projects.2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Actual Revised Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected ProjectedRevenuesGeneral Property Taxes / HRA Levy- - - - - - - - - - - - Intergovernmental1,329,678 1,300,000 - - - - - - - - - - Hennepin County/ Operating Grants200,000 - - - - - - - - - - Charges for Services6,000 6,000 6,000 6,180 6,365 6,556 6,753 6,956 7,164 7,379 7,601 7,829 Special Assessments330 - - - - - - - - - - PILOT - Payment In Lieu of Taxes25,751 22,000 26,104 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 Rent Revenue183,611 187,825 186,881 192,487 198,262 204,210 210,336 216,646 223,146 229,840 236,735 243,837 Interest Income456,607 87,000 400,000 243,327 243,790 242,236 231,581 225,622 214,668 202,480 187,494 171,782 Miscellaneous/ Other Revenue968,550 740,300 741,300 701,308 701,308 701,308 701,308 701,308 701,308 701,308 701,308 701,308 Lodging Tax- City Portion41,498 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 Proceeds from Sale of Land2,200,000 6,785,000 - Transfers In777,248 - - Total Revenues6,189,273$ 2,383,125$ 8,185,285$ 1,205,302$ 1,211,725$ 1,216,310$ 1,211,978$ 1,212,532$ 1,208,286$ 1,203,007$ 1,195,138$ 1,186,756$ ExpendituresPersonal Services479,450 557,956 589,621 604,362 619,471 636,506 655,601 675,269 695,527 716,393 737,885 760,021 Supplies204 100 100 100 103 106 109 113 116 119 123 127 Non-Capital Equipment- - - - - - - - - - Services & Other Charges534,828 571,179 703,570 693,570 714,377 735,808 757,883 780,619 804,038 828,159 853,004 878,594 Disposal Charges3,176 3,400 3,400 3,400 3,502 3,607 3,715 3,827 3,942 4,060 4,182 4,307 Capital Outlay1,315,361 878,397 750,000 774,750 700,000 500,000 - - - - - - McGarvey Site3,010,000 - Debt Service74,102 Payments to CVB786,811 741,308 741,300 741,308 741,308 741,308 741,308 741,308 741,308 741,308 741,308 741,308 Transfers Out500,000 - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenditures3,693,932$ 2,752,340$ 5,797,991$ 2,817,490$ 2,778,761$ 2,617,336$ 2,158,616$ 2,201,136$ 2,244,930$ 2,290,039$ 2,336,501$ 2,384,357$ Incr/(Decr) in Fund Balance2,495,340$ (369,215)$ 2,387,294$ (1,612,187)$ (1,567,036)$ (1,401,025)$ (946,639)$ (988,604)$ (1,036,645)$ (1,087,032)$ (1,141,363)$ (1,197,600)$ Fund Balance - Beginning23,920,938$ 26,416,278$ 26,047,060$ 28,434,351$ 26,822,161$ 25,255,122$ 23,854,094$ 22,907,452$ 21,918,846$ 20,882,198$ 19,795,163$ 18,653,797$ Fund Balance - Ending26,416,278$ 26,047,060$ 28,434,351$ 26,822,161$ 25,255,122$ 23,854,094$ 22,907,452$ 21,918,846$ 20,882,198$ 19,795,163$ 18,653,797$ 17,456,194$ Fund Balance Percentage1409.66% 449.24% 1009.21% 965.26% 964.92% 1105.06% 1040.71% 976.37% 911.87% 847.21% 782.34% 717.28%Cash Available at Year End10,236,497$ 12,249,832$ 16,221,781$ 16,252,639$ 16,149,072$ 15,438,708$ 15,041,472$ 14,311,178$ 13,498,666$ 12,499,620$ 11,452,162$ 11,450,996$ Cash Available Percentage546.25% 211.28% 575.75%584.89% 617.00% 715.21% 683.35% 637.49% 589.45% 534.97% 480.30% 470.53%Target Cash Balance - Page 11Updated 10/10/2016Special Study Session Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Review of Proposed 2017 CIP, LRFMP and Utility RatesPage 38 Financial Management PlanHRA Levy - This fund is to be used for infrastructure construction in redevelopment areas and qualifying housing programs.2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Actual Revised Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected ProjectedRevenuesGeneral Property Taxes / HRA Levy941,360 1,011,208 1,086,461 1,086,461 1,086,461 1,086,461 1,086,461 1,086,461 1,086,461 1,086,461 1,086,461 1,086,461 Interest Income- 219 (0) (0) (0) 3,606 4,498 20,583 36,902 53,456 70,250 87,287 Miscellaneous/ Other Revenue- - - - - - - - - - Transfers In- Total Revenues941,360$ 1,011,427$ 1,086,461$ 1,086,461$ 1,086,461$ 1,090,067$ 1,090,959$ 1,107,044$ 1,123,363$ 1,139,917$ 1,156,711$ 1,173,748$ ExpendituresServices & Other Charges149,391 16,041 16,522 17,018 17,528 18,054 18,596 19,154 19,728 20,320 20,930 21,558 Transfers Out- 1,940,332 1,069,939 1,069,443 828,553 1,012,542 Total Expenditures149,391$ 1,956,373$ 1,086,461$ 1,086,461$ 846,081$ 1,030,596$ 18,596$ 19,154$ 19,728$ 20,320$ 20,930$ 21,558$ Incr/(Decr) in Fund Balance791,969$ (944,946)$ (0)$ 0$ 240,380$ 59,470$ 1,072,363$ 1,087,890$ 1,103,634$ 1,119,597$ 1,135,781$ 1,152,190$ Fund Balance - Beginning(4,449,644)$ (3,657,675)$ (2,800,491)$ (1,814,690)$ (799,825)$ 244,975$ 304,445$ 1,376,808$ 2,464,698$ 3,568,333$ 4,687,929$ 5,823,710$ Fund Balance - Ending(3,657,675)$ (2,800,491)$ (1,814,690)$ (799,825)$ 244,975$ 304,445$ 1,376,808$ 2,464,698$ 3,568,333$ 4,687,929$ 5,823,710$ 6,975,900$ Fund Balance Percentage-378.63% -257.76% -167.03% -94.53% 23.77% 1637.16% 7188.17% 12493.14% 17560.47% 22398.28% 27014.45% 31416.61%Cash Available at Year End944,946$ (0)$ (0)$ (0)$ 240,379$ 299,850$ 1,372,213$ 2,460,103$ 3,563,737$ 4,683,334$ 5,819,115$ 6,971,305$ Cash Available Percentage97.82% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 23.32% 1612.45% 7164.18% 12469.85% 17537.85% 22376.32% 26993.13% 31395.92%Target Cash Balance - Page 12Updated 10/10/2016Special Study Session Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Review of Proposed 2017 CIP, LRFMP and Utility RatesPage 39 Financial Management PlanPermanent Improvement Revolving Fund - Provides cash flow for project construction and is repaid through reimbursements from Municipal State Aid (MSA), or special assessments. 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Actual Revised Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected ProjectedRevenuesSpecial Assessments243,736 251,048 90,282 82,247 65,551 53,956 23,589 22,495 16,735 10,620 10,620 2,893 Park Dedication Fee200 206 212 219 225 232 239 246 253 261 269 277 Interest Income11,251 35,259 38,077 38,481 38,725 38,676 38,403 37,621 36,759 35,745 34,570 33,321 Miscellaneous/ Other Revenue2,245 2,312 2,382 2,453 2,527 2,603 2,681 2,761 2,844 2,929 3,017 3,108 Total Revenues257,432$ 288,825$ 130,953$ 123,400$ 107,028$ 95,466$ 64,911$ 63,123$ 56,591$ 49,555$ 48,476$ 39,598$ ExpendituresServices & Other Charges100,974 100,974 104,003 107,123 110,337 113,647 117,056 120,568 124,185 127,910 131,748 135,700 Transfers Out430,639 Total Expenditures531,613$ 100,974$ 104,003$ 107,123$ 110,337$ 113,647$ 117,056$ 120,568$ 124,185$ 127,910$ 131,748$ 135,700$ Incr/(Decr) in Fund Balance(274,181)$ 187,852$ 26,950$ 16,277$ (3,308)$ (18,181)$ (52,145)$ (57,445)$ (67,593)$ (78,355)$ (83,272)$ (96,102)$ Fund Balance - Beginning2,612,122$ 2,337,942$ 2,525,794$ 2,552,744$ 2,569,021$ 2,565,712$ 2,547,532$ 2,495,387$ 2,437,942$ 2,370,348$ 2,291,994$ 2,208,722$ Fund Balance - Ending2,337,942$ 2,525,794$ 2,552,744$ 2,569,021$ 2,565,712$ 2,547,532$ 2,495,387$ 2,437,942$ 2,370,348$ 2,291,994$ 2,208,722$ 2,112,620$ Fund Balance Percentage2315.40%2428.58% 2383.00% 2328.35% 2257.62% 2176.33% 2069.70% 1963.16% 1853.13% 1739.68% 1627.65% 1511.49%Cash Available at Year End2,350,600$ 2,538,452$ 2,565,402$ 2,581,678$ 2,578,370$ 2,560,189$ 2,508,045$ 2,450,600$ 2,383,006$ 2,304,651$ 2,221,379$ 2,125,277$ Cash Available Percentage2327.93% 2440.75% 2394.82% 2339.82% 2268.76% 2187.15% 2080.19% 1973.35% 1863.03% 1749.29% 1636.98% 1520.54%Target Cash Balance - Page 13Updated 10/10/2016Special Study Session Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Review of Proposed 2017 CIP, LRFMP and Utility RatesPage 40 Financial Management PlanPark Improvement Fund - This fund is responsible for financing capital expenditures within City parks and improvement of park facilities2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Actual Revised Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected ProjectedRevenuesGeneral Property Taxes / HRA Levy810,000 810,000 810,000 900,000 1,100,000 1,300,000 1,400,000 1,400,000 1,400,000 1,400,000 1,400,000 1,400,000 Intergovernmental50,000 51,500 53,045 54,636 56,275 57,964 59,703 61,494 63,339 65,239 67,196 69,212 Hennepin County/ Operating Grant- - - - - - - - - - - - Hockey Association104,666 104,166 104,166 104,166 104,166 104,166 104,166 104,166 104,166 104,166 104,174 School District Contributions44,702 44,702 44,702 44,702 44,702 44,702 44,702 44,702 44,702 44,702 44,702 44,702 Park Dedication Fee659,998 250,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 Rent Revenue9,000 9,038 9,038 9,038 9,038 9,038 9,038 9,038 9,038 9,038 9,038 9,038 Interest Income17,996 63,805 30,855 15,110 4,088 2,110 606 701 71 3,617 1,508 3,912 Miscellaneous/ Other Revenue59,355 1,006,000 - - - - - - - - - - Bond Proceeds10,000,000 Transfers In679,000 Total Revenues1,651,051$ 13,018,711$ 1,401,806$ 1,477,653$ 1,668,269$ 1,867,980$ 1,968,215$ 1,970,101$ 1,971,315$ 1,976,761$ 1,976,610$ 1,981,038$ ExpendituresNon-Capital Equipment815 815 839 865 891 917 945 973 1,002 1,032 1,063 1,095 Services & Other Charges484,066 484,066 498,588 513,546 528,952 544,820 561,165 578,000 595,340 613,200 631,596 650,544 Tree Replacement & Reforestation (Ex70,428 238,178 70,000 72,100 74,263 76,491 78,786 81,149 83,584 86,091 88,674 91,334 Debt ServiceCapital Outlay 988,759 14,492,322 1,882,000 1,626,000 1,196,000 1,346,000 1,321,000 1,352,000 1,055,000 1,417,000 1,095,000 1,409,000 Total Expenditures1,544,069$ 15,215,381$ 2,451,427$ 2,212,510$ 1,800,105$ 1,968,229$ 1,961,896$ 2,012,122$ 1,734,926$ 2,117,324$ 1,816,334$ 2,151,974$ Incr/(Decr) in Fund Balance106,982$ (2,196,670)$ (1,049,622)$ (734,857)$ (131,837)$ (100,249)$ 6,319$ (42,022)$ 236,389$ (140,563)$ 160,276$ (170,936)$ Fund Balance - Beginning3,584,546$ 3,691,530$ 1,494,860$ 445,238$ (289,619)$ (421,456)$ (521,705)$ (515,385)$ (557,407)$ (321,018)$ (461,580)$ (301,304)$ Fund Balance - Ending3,691,530$ 1,494,860$ 445,238$ (289,619)$ (421,456)$ (521,705)$ (515,385)$ (557,407)$ (321,018)$ (461,580)$ (301,304)$ (472,240)$ Fund Balance Percentage49.43% 60.98% 20.12% -16.09% -21.41% -26.59% -25.61% -32.13% -15.16% -25.41% -14.00% -61.71%Cash Available at Year End4,253,650$ 2,056,980$ 1,007,358$ 272,501$ 140,664$ 40,415$ 46,735$ 4,713$ 241,102$ 100,539$ 260,816$ 89,880$ Cash Available Percentage56.96% 83.91% 45.53% 15.14% 7.15% 2.06% 2.32% 0.27% 11.39% 5.54% 12.12% 11.75%Target Cash Balance - Page 14Updated 10/10/2016Special Study Session Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Review of Proposed 2017 CIP, LRFMP and Utility RatesPage 41 Financial Management PlanPavement Management Fund - Funds expenditures are used for pavement rehabilitation within the City.2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Actual Revised Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected ProjectedRevenuesFranchise Fees2,245,935 2,315,777 2,373,671 2,433,013 2,493,839 2,556,185 2,620,089 2,685,591 2,752,731 2,821,549 2,892,088 2,964,390 Additional Franchise Fees699,837 699,837 1,478,363 1,478,363 1,478,363 1,478,363 1,478,363 1,478,363 1,478,363 1,478,363 Interest Income7,785 22,511 22,910 (6,796) (15,055) (7,287) (7,697) (10,128) (3,217) (4,005) (4,634) 6,271 Transfers In750,000 Total Revenues3,003,721$ 2,338,288$ 3,096,418$ 3,126,055$ 3,957,147$ 4,027,261$ 4,090,756$ 4,153,827$ 4,227,877$ 4,295,907$ 4,365,817$ 4,449,025$ ExpendituresServices & Other Charges37,502 37,502 38,627 39,786 40,980 42,209 43,476 44,780 46,123 47,507 48,932 50,400 Capital Outlay (Mod Approach)- 2,274,212 5,038,166 3,636,865 3,398,303 4,012,380 4,209,361 3,648,350 4,234,269 4,290,350 3,589,850 3,932,350 Transfers Out2,013,401 - - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenditures2,050,904$ 2,311,714$ 5,076,793$ 3,676,651$ 3,439,283$ 4,054,589$ 4,252,837$ 3,693,130$ 4,280,392$ 4,337,857$ 3,638,782$ 3,982,750$ Incr/(Decr) in Fund Balance952,817$ 26,574$ (1,980,375)$ (550,597)$ 517,864$ (27,328)$ (162,081)$ 460,697$ (52,515)$ (41,950)$ 727,035$ 466,274$ Fund Balance - Beginning1,086,362$ 2,039,178$ 2,065,752$ 85,377$ (465,220)$ 52,644$ 25,316$ (136,765)$ 323,931$ 271,416$ 229,466$ 956,501$ Fund Balance - Ending2,039,178$ 2,065,752$ 85,377$ (465,220)$ 52,644$ 25,316$ (136,765)$ 323,931$ 271,416$ 229,466$ 956,501$ 1,422,775$ Fund Balance Percentage92.69% 40.69% 2.32% -13.53% 1.30% 0.60% -3.70% 7.57% 6.26% 6.31% 24.02% 2740.74%Page 15Updated 10/10/2016Special Study Session Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Review of Proposed 2017 CIP, LRFMP and Utility RatesPage 42 Financial Management PlanSidewalks and Trails- This fund accounts for revenues and expenditures related to the the enhancement of the City's sidewalks and trails system.2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Actual Revised Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected ProjectedRevenuesGeneral Property Taxes/ HRA Levy645,007 - - - - - - - - - - Tax Levy- - - - - - - - - - Tax Levy (2nd Issue- 10yr)- - 700,000 700,000 700,000 700,000 700,000 700,000 700,000 700,000 Tax Levy (3rd Issue- 15yr)- - - - 700,000 700,000 700,000 700,000 700,000 700,000 Tax Levy (4th Issue- 15yr)- - - - - - 700,000 700,000 700,000 700,000 Interest Income10,246 38,573 23,891 66,099 26,204 24,922 8,414 102,838 7,444 6,048 4,631 Miscellaneous/ Other Revenue- - - - - - - - - - Bond Proceeds6,000,000 8,000,000 8,200,000 Transfers In910,442 Total Revenues1,565,695$ 38,573$ 6,023,891$ 766,099$ 8,726,204$ 1,424,922$ 9,608,414$ 2,202,838$ 2,107,444$ 2,106,048$ 2,104,631$ ExpendituresPersonal Services214 214 221 227 235 242 250 257 265 273 Services & Other Charges209 209 215 222 228 235 242 250 257 265 273 Debt Service- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Debt Service Pymts (2nd Issue- 10yr)- - 700,000 700,000 700,000 700,000 700,000 700,000 700,000 700,000 Debt Service Pymts (3rdIssue- 15yr)- - - - 700,000 700,000 700,000 700,000 700,000 700,000 Debt Service Pymts (4th Issue- 15yr)- - - - - - 700,000 700,000 700,000 700,000 Capital Outlay3,180 1,017,000 3,209,600 2,725,300 8,111,200 1,125,000 1,913,000 6,461,900 100,000 100,000 100,000 Transfers Out1,948,500 Total Expenditures1,951,889$ 1,017,423$ 3,210,029$ 3,425,742$ 8,811,656$ 2,525,470$ 3,313,485$ 8,562,399$ 2,200,514$ 2,200,530$ 2,200,545$ Incr/(Decr) in Fund Balance(386,194)$ (978,850)$ 2,813,861$ (2,659,644)$ (85,452)$ (1,100,548)$ 6,294,929$ (6,359,561)$ (93,070)$ (94,481)$ (95,914)$ Fund Balance - Beginning2,967,208$ 2,581,015$ 1,602,165$ 4,416,026$ 1,756,382$ 1,670,931$ 570,383$ 6,865,312$ 505,751$ 412,681$ 318,200$ Fund Balance - Ending2,581,015$ 1,602,165$ 4,416,026$ 1,756,382$ 1,670,931$ 570,383$ 6,865,312$ 505,751$ 412,681$ 318,200$ 222,286$ Fund Balance Percentage230.69% 49.91% 128.91% 19.93% 66.16% 17.21% 80.18% 22.98% 18.75% 14.46% 10.10%Cash Available at Year End2,571,561$ 1,592,711$ 4,406,573$ 1,746,929$ 1,661,477$ 560,929$ 6,855,859$ 496,297$ 403,228$ 308,747$ 212,833$ Cash Available Percentage229.85% 49.62% 128.63% 19.83% 65.79% 16.93% 80.07% 22.55% 18.32% 14.03% 9.67%Target Cash Balance - Page 16Updated 10/10/2016Special Study Session Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Review of Proposed 2017 CIP, LRFMP and Utility RatesPage 43 Financial Management PlanCapital Replacement Fund - Funds technology, buildings, and equipment capital expenditures. Also combines Fire Station Bond Fund (4040)2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Actual Revised Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected ProjectedRevenuesGeneral Property Taxes / HRA Levy 1,442,700 1,767,700 1,767,700 1,767,700 1,767,700 1,767,700 1,767,700 1,767,700 1,767,700 1,767,700 1,767,700 1,767,700 Intergovernmental - - - - - - - - - - - Hennepin County/ Operating Grants - - - - - - - - - - - Equipment Replacement Charges 1,030,463 1,187,591 1,310,272 1,349,580 1,390,068 1,431,770 1,474,723 1,518,964 1,564,533 1,611,469 1,659,813 1,709,608 Technology Replacement Charges 123,456 127,160 130,974 134,904 138,951 143,119 147,413 151,835 156,390 161,082 165,915 Housing Authority 11,503 11,503 11,503 11,503 11,503 11,503 11,503 11,503 11,503 11,503 11,503 11,503 LGA (Capital Replacement Fund) 512,466 539,434 545,474 545,474 545,474 - - - - - - - Interest Income 9,600 5,396 18,041 9,977 15,678 29,549 24,660 27,728 22,834 29,306 47,093 66,486 Miscellaneous/ Other Revenue1,260 1,298 1,337 1,377 1,419 1,461 1,505 1,550 1,597 1,645 1,694 1,745 Bond Proceeds11,000,000 Transfers In724,601 500,000 Total Revenues3,732,593$ 4,136,378$ 3,781,487$ 3,816,586$ 14,866,745$ 3,380,933$ 3,423,210$ 3,474,858$ 3,520,003$ 3,578,013$ 3,648,885$ 3,722,956$ ExpendituresSupplies1,382 1,382 1,423 1,466 1,510 1,555 1,602 1,650 1,699 1,750 1,803 1,857 Non-Capital Equipment667,963 Services & Other Charges3,161,243 Capital Outlay126,943 Technology1,234,866 1,364,666 871,291 976,044 1,081,597 1,261,616 1,006,773 1,075,071 1,056,515 1,112,107 945,851 Annual Equip. Repl. Program1,417,271 1,416,510 1,721,562 1,610,769 2,198,523 1,402,255 2,138,454 1,400,502 1,135,947 929,591 2,087,977 Buildings315,250 1,328,500 790,000 11,315,000 388,000 370,000 635,000 175,000 190,000 260,000 95,000 Fire/Police324,594 208,000 52,200 38,700 37,200 183,200 19,200 436,283 8,000 52,500 Transfers Out910,442 Total Expenditures4,867,973$ 3,293,363$ 4,319,099$ 3,436,519$ 13,942,023$ 3,706,875$ 3,218,673$ 3,801,077$ 3,088,555$ 2,392,212$ 2,356,001$ 3,130,685$ Incr/(Decr) in Fund Balance(1,135,380)$ 843,015$ (537,612)$ 380,067$ 924,722$ (325,942)$ 204,537$ (326,219)$ 431,447$ 1,185,801$ 1,292,885$ 592,271$ Fund Balance - Beginning19,181,097$ 18,045,711$ 18,888,726$ 18,351,114$ 18,731,181$ 19,655,903$ 19,329,961$ 19,534,498$ 19,208,279$ 19,639,726$ 20,825,527$ 22,118,412$ Fund Balance - Ending18,045,711$ 18,888,726$ 18,351,114$ 18,731,181$ 19,655,903$ 19,329,961$ 19,534,498$ 19,208,279$ 19,639,726$ 20,825,527$ 22,118,412$ 22,710,683$ Fund Balance Percentage502.39% 437.33% 534.00% 134.35% 530.26% 600.56% 513.92% 621.92% 820.99% 883.94% 706.50% 1187384.18%Cash Available at Year End359,727$ 1,202,742$ 665,130$ 1,045,197$ 1,969,919$ 1,643,977$ 1,848,514$ 1,522,295$ 1,953,743$ 3,139,543$ 4,432,428$ 5,024,700$ Cash Available Percentage10.01% 27.85% 19.35% 7.50% 53.14% 51.08% 48.63% 49.29% 81.67% 133.26% 141.58% 262706.70%Target Cash Balance - 35-50%Page 17Updated 10/10/2016Special Study Session Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Review of Proposed 2017 CIP, LRFMP and Utility RatesPage 44 Financial Management PlanWater Utility Fund - Accounts for all provisions of water services including administration, billing and collection, Reilly, maintenance, operations and capital.Qtrly Fixed Fee Increase (3/4" met2.44$ 2.44$ 2.44$ 2.44$ 2.44$ 2.44$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Percent Usage Fee Increase 4% 7% 7% 7% 6% 6% 6% 6% 5% 5% 5% 5%201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026Actual Revised Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected ProjectedRevenuesLicenses & Permits26,405 5,000 25,000 25,750 26,523 27,318 28,138 28,982 29,851 30,747 31,669 32,619 Charges for Services4,858,914 5,757,419 6,160,438 6,591,669 6,987,169 7,406,399 7,850,783 8,321,830 8,737,922 9,174,818 9,633,559 10,115,237 Water Available Charge (WAC)326,250 209,250 260,000 260,000 260,000 260,000 260,000 260,000 260,000 260,000 260,000 260,000 Special Assessments161,923 - - - - - - - - - - - Rent Revenue357,774 260,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 Interest Income27,392 - 3,408 50,927 28,904 74,232 50,242 16,711 6,439 57,127 47,425 42,847 Miscellaneous/ Other Revenue35,334 - - - - - - - - - - - Bond Proceeds- - 5,000,000 - 5,000,000 - - - 4,000,000 - - - Total Revenues5,803,991$ 6,231,669$ 11,798,846$ 7,278,346$ 12,652,596$ 8,117,950$ 8,539,163$ 8,977,523$ 13,384,212$ 9,872,692$ 10,322,653$ 10,800,703$ ExpendituresPersonal Services1,248,869 1,224,361 1,333,133 1,366,461 1,400,623 1,439,140 1,482,314 1,526,784 1,572,587 1,619,765 1,668,358 1,718,408 Supplies225,581 453,000 524,800 540,544 556,760 573,463 590,667 608,387 626,639 645,438 664,801 684,745 Non-Capital Equipment3,014 20,000 20,000 20,600 21,218 21,855 22,510 23,185 23,881 24,597 25,335 26,095 Services & Other Charges2,181,327 1,045,730 949,377 977,858 1,007,194 1,037,410 1,068,532 1,100,588 1,133,606 1,167,614 1,202,642 1,238,722 Debt Service321,878 1,050,115 1,349,847 1,353,373 1,356,377 1,361,272 927,720 931,943 934,289 691,823 694,859 545,400 2017 Debt Service- - - 625,000 625,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 1,900,000 1,900,000 1,900,000 Capital Outlay(61,893) 1,766,194 3,118,298 2,302,562 3,085,755 2,434,847 3,789,721 2,533,269 2,729,354 2,687,815 2,640,140 2,537,230 Estimated Repl. (Main to Curb box- - - 184,575 161,000 140,000 140,000 140,000 140,000 140,000 140,000 140,000 Other expenses - - 12,000 12,360 12,731 13,113 13,506 13,911 14,329 14,758 15,201 15,657 Transfers Out 1,292,652 567,429 584,451 601,985 620,044 638,645 657,805 677,539 697,865 718,801 740,365 762,576 Reilly 517,353 687,854 739,021 761,192 784,027 807,548 831,775 856,728 882,430 908,903 936,170 964,255 Total Expenditures5,770,534$ 6,885,183$ 8,630,927$ 8,746,510$ 9,630,730$ 9,717,293$ 10,774,550$ 9,662,334$ 10,004,979$ 10,519,514$ 10,627,871$ 10,533,089$ Incr/(Decr) in Fund Balance33,457$ (653,514)$ 3,167,919$ (1,468,164)$ 3,021,866$ (1,599,344)$ (2,235,388)$ (684,811)$ 3,379,233$ (646,822)$ (305,218)$ 267,614$ Fund Balance - Beginning5,113,056$ 5,146,517$ 4,493,003$ 7,660,922$ 6,192,758$ 9,214,624$ 7,615,280$ 5,379,892$ 4,695,082$ 8,074,315$ 7,427,493$ 7,122,275$ Fund Balance - Ending5,146,517$ 4,493,003$ 7,660,922$ 6,192,758$ 9,214,624$ 7,615,280$ 5,379,892$ 4,695,082$ 8,074,315$ 7,427,493$ 7,122,275$ 7,389,889$ Fund Balance Percentage57.70% 52.06% 87.59% 64.30% 94.83% 70.68% 55.68% 46.93% 76.76% 69.89% 67.62% 99.10%Cash Available at Year End880,701$ 227,187$ 3,395,106$ 1,926,942$ 4,948,808$ 3,349,464$ 1,114,076$ 429,266$ 3,808,499$ 3,161,677$ 2,856,459$ 3,124,073$ Cash Available Percentage9.87% 2.63% 38.82% 20.01% 50.93% 31.09% 11.53% 4.29% 36.20% 29.75% 27.12% 41.90%Target Cash Balance - 35-50%Page 18Updated 10/10/2016Special Study Session Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Review of Proposed 2017 CIP, LRFMP and Utility RatesPage 45 Financial Management PlanSewer Utility Fund - This fund is to be used for all provisions of sewer services including administration, billing and collection, maintenance, operations and capital.Percentage Rate Increase4.5%8%7%7%6%4%3%3%2%2%2%2%201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026Actual Revised Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected ProjectedRevenuesIntergovernmental1,018 - - - - - - - - - - Charges for Services5,990,801 6,404,588 6,915,804 7,399,910 7,843,905 8,157,661 8,402,391 8,654,463 8,827,552 9,004,103 9,184,185 9,367,869 Special Assessments73,518 30,000 30,000 30,900 31,827 32,782 33,765 34,778 35,822 36,896 38,003 39,143 Interest Income5,283 10,000 (5,244) 19,135 18,727 20,452 26,069 32,548 39,847 46,152 51,967 66,645 Miscellaneous/ Other Revenue46,688 - - - - - - - - - - Bond Proceeds- 1,750,000 Transfers InTotal Revenues6,117,307$ 6,444,588$ 8,690,560$ 7,449,945$ 7,894,459$ 8,210,895$ 8,462,225$ 8,721,789$ 8,903,221$ 9,087,151$ 9,274,155$ 9,473,657$ ExpendituresPersonal Services562,700 571,540 618,546 634,010 649,860 667,731 687,763 708,396 729,648 751,537 774,083 797,306 Supplies15,216 25,050 25,550 26,317 27,106 27,919 28,757 29,619 30,508 31,423 32,366 33,337 Non-Capital Equipment1,736 39,500 39,500 40,685 41,906 43,163 44,458 45,791 47,165 48,580 50,037 51,539 Services & Other Charges671,562 481,807 499,451 514,435 529,868 545,764 562,137 579,001 596,371 614,262 632,690 651,670 Debt Service5,645 21,914 22,016 22,084 22,118 22,093 22,031 21,929 22,279 - - - 2017 debt service- - - 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 Disposal Charges3,693,817 4,177,164 4,263,610 4,391,518 4,523,264 4,658,962 4,798,731 4,942,693 5,090,973 5,243,703 5,401,014 5,563,044 Capital Outlay- 1,954,786 785,983 813,119 925,333 785,001 774,001 768,001 798,001 813,001 178,501 178,501 Other Expenses- - 11,000 11,330 11,670 12,020 12,381 12,752 13,135 13,529 13,934 14,353 Transfers Out1,344,488 776,357 799,648 823,637 848,346 873,797 900,011 927,011 954,821 983,466 1,012,970 1,043,359 Total Expenditures6,295,163$ 8,048,118$ 7,065,303$ 7,477,134$ 7,779,470$ 7,836,449$ 8,030,267$ 8,235,192$ 8,482,900$ 8,699,500$ 8,295,595$ 8,533,108$ Incr/(Decr) in Fund Balance(177,855)$ (1,603,530)$ 1,625,257$ (27,189)$ 114,989$ 374,446$ 431,958$ 486,597$ 420,320$ 387,651$ 978,560$ 940,549$ Fund Balance - Beginning6,705,575$ 6,527,721$ 4,924,191$ 6,549,448$ 6,522,259$ 6,637,248$ 7,011,694$ 7,443,652$ 7,930,249$ 8,350,569$ 8,738,220$ 9,716,780$ Fund Balance - Ending6,527,721$ 4,924,191$ 6,549,448$ 6,522,259$ 6,637,248$ 7,011,694$ 7,443,652$ 7,930,249$ 8,350,569$ 8,738,220$ 9,716,780$ 10,657,329$ Fund Balance Percentage87.34% 69.70% 87.59% 83.84% 84.70% 87.32% 90.39% 93.49% 95.99% 105.34% 113.87% 141.91%Cash Available at Year End1,253,942$ (349,587)$ 1,275,670$ 1,248,481$ 1,363,470$ 1,737,916$ 2,169,873$ 2,656,470$ 3,076,791$ 3,464,441$ 4,443,001$ 5,383,550$ Cash Available Percentage16.78% -4.95% 17.06% 16.05% 17.40% 21.64% 26.35% 31.32% 35.37% 41.76% 52.07% 71.69%Target Cash Balance - 35-50%Page 19Updated 10/10/2016Special Study Session Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Review of Proposed 2017 CIP, LRFMP and Utility RatesPage 46 Financial Management PlanSolid Waste Utility Fund - Accounts for all provisions of revenues and expenses related to the collection, disposal and recycling of residential solid waste.Percentage Rate Increase5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5%201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026Actual Revised Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected ProjectedRevenuesIntergovernmental3,000 - - - - - - - - - - 115,610 101,000 148,000 101,000 101,000 101,000 101,000 101,000 101,000 101,000 101,000 101,000 Charges for Services3,180,256 3,295,700 3,319,001 3,484,951 3,659,199 3,842,159 4,034,266 4,235,980 4,447,779 4,670,168 4,903,676 5,148,860 Interest Income10,601 18,000 30,849 25,013 19,483 14,475 11,157 8,790 7,477 7,326 8,379 10,908 Miscellaneous/ Other Revenue9,309 2,500 2,500 2,575 2,652 2,732 2,814 2,898 2,985 3,075 3,167 3,262 Total Revenues3,318,776$ 3,417,200$ 3,500,350$ 3,613,539$ 3,782,334$ 3,960,365$ 4,149,237$ 4,348,668$ 4,559,241$ 4,781,568$ 5,016,222$ 5,264,030$ ExpendituresPersonal Services387,170 536,896 570,363 584,622 599,238 615,717 634,188 653,214 672,810 692,995 713,784 735,198 Supplies39,453 81,600 95,350 98,211 101,157 104,192 107,317 110,537 113,853 117,268 120,787 124,410 Non-Capital Equipment32,650 49,000 43,000 44,290 45,619 46,987 48,397 49,849 51,344 52,885 54,471 56,105 Services & Other Charges81,129 106,367 119,499 123,084 126,776 130,580 134,497 138,532 142,688 146,969 151,378 155,919 Disposal Charges2,367,972 2,463,000 2,573,000 2,850,190 2,935,696 3,023,767 3,114,480 3,207,914 3,304,151 3,403,276 3,505,374 3,610,535 Capital Outlay- 64,395 250,000 36,436 55,000 - - - - 5,000 - - Other Expenses- - 11,000 11,330 11,670 12,020 12,381 12,752 13,135 13,529 13,934 14,353 Transfers Out214,186 220,611 227,229 234,046 241,068 248,300 255,749 263,421 271,324 279,463 287,847 296,483 Total Expenditures3,122,560$ 3,521,869$ 3,889,441$ 3,982,209$ 4,116,223$ 4,181,561$ 4,307,008$ 4,436,219$ 4,569,305$ 4,711,384$ 4,847,576$ 4,993,003$ Incr/(Decr) in Fund Balance196,216$ (104,669)$ (389,091)$ (368,670)$ (333,889)$ (221,196)$ (157,771)$ (87,550)$ (10,064)$ 70,184$ 168,646$ 271,027$ Fund Balance - Beginning2,401,631$ 2,597,847$ 2,493,178$ 2,104,087$ 1,735,418$ 1,401,529$ 1,180,332$ 1,022,561$ 935,011$ 924,946$ 995,130$ 1,163,776$ Fund Balance - Ending2,597,847$ 2,493,178$ 2,104,087$ 1,735,418$ 1,401,529$ 1,180,332$ 1,022,561$ 935,011$ 924,946$ 995,130$ 1,163,776$ 1,434,804$ Fund Balance Percentage73.76% 64.10% 52.84% 42.16% 33.52% 27.40% 23.05% 20.46% 19.63% 20.53% 23.31% 27.98%Target Cash Balance - 25-40%Cash Available at Year End2,161,295$ 2,056,626$ 1,667,535$ 1,298,866$ 964,977$ 743,780$ 586,009$ 498,459$ 488,394$ 558,578$ 727,224$ 998,252$ Cash Available Percentage61.37% 52.88% 41.87% 31.55% 23.08% 17.27% 13.21% 10.91% 10.37% 11.52% 14.56% 19.47%Target Cash Balance - 25-40%Hennepin County/ Op. Grants /Score GrantPage 20Updated 10/10/2016Special Study Session Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Review of Proposed 2017 CIP, LRFMP and Utility RatesPage 47 Financial Management PlanStorm Water Utility Fund - This fund is to be used for all provisions of storm water including administration, billing and collection, maintenance, operations and capital.Percentage Rate Increase10%10%2.5%2.5%2.5%1%1%1%0%0%0%0%Rate- residential qtrly19.36$ 21.30$ 21.83$ 22.37$ 22.93$ 23.16$ 23.39$ 23.63$ 23.63$ 23.63$ 23.63$ 23.63$ 201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026Actual Revised Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected ProjectedRevenuesCharges for Services2,469,057 2,717,638 2,785,579 2,855,218 2,926,599 2,955,865 2,985,424 3,015,278 3,015,278 3,015,278 3,015,278 3,015,278 Interest Income16,054 24,000 34,994 16,691 16,742 24,307 28,497 37,717 40,807 42,587 45,219 54,593 Miscellaneous/ Other Revenue3,078 - - - - - - - - - - Bond Proceeds- - Total Revenues2,488,190$ 2,741,638$ 2,820,573$ 2,871,909$ 2,943,341$ 2,980,172$ 3,013,921$ 3,052,995$ 3,056,085$ 3,057,865$ 3,060,497$ 3,069,871$ ExpendituresPersonal Services511,933 689,746 713,610 731,450 749,737 770,354 793,465 817,269 841,787 867,041 893,052 919,843 Supplies1,775 27,100 27,800 28,634 29,493 30,378 31,289 32,228 33,195 34,190 35,216 36,273 Non-Capital Equipment1,599 3,000 3,000 3,090 3,183 3,278 3,377 3,478 3,582 3,690 3,800 3,914 Services & Other Charges794,130 600,664 597,828 615,763 634,236 653,263 672,861 693,047 713,838 735,253 757,311 780,030 Debt Service46,627 383,044 182,804 183,397 183,897 184,777 96,878 97,620 98,384 - - - Other Expenses11,000 11,330 11,670 12,020 12,381 12,752 13,135 13,529 13,934 14,353 Capital Outlay- 1,050,212 2,191,667 972,353 494,667 704,667 436,667 827,667 859,667 843,667 335,667 220,667 Transfers Out841,524 303,949 313,067 322,459 332,133 342,097 352,360 362,930 373,818 385,033 396,584 408,481 Total Expenditures2,197,588$ 3,057,715$ 4,040,776$ 2,868,476$ 2,439,014$ 2,700,833$ 2,399,277$ 2,846,990$ 2,937,406$ 2,882,402$ 2,435,564$ 2,383,561$ Incr/(Decr) in Fund Balance290,602$ (316,077)$ (1,220,203)$ 3,433$ 504,327$ 279,339$ 614,644$ 206,004$ 118,679$ 175,463$ 624,933$ 686,310$ Fund Balance - Beginning14,777,186$ 15,067,791$ 14,751,713$ 13,531,510$ 13,534,943$ 14,039,270$ 14,318,609$ 14,933,253$ 15,139,257$ 15,257,937$ 15,433,399$ 16,058,332$ Fund Balance - Ending15,067,791$ 14,751,713$ 13,531,510$ 13,534,943$ 14,039,270$ 14,318,609$ 14,933,253$ 15,139,257$ 15,257,937$ 15,433,399$ 16,058,332$ 16,744,642$ Fund Balance Percentage331.85% 365.07% 471.73% 554.93% 519.81% 596.79% 524.53% 515.40% 529.35% 633.67% 673.71% 679.85%Cash Available at Year End2,649,006$ 2,332,929$ 1,112,725$ 1,116,158$ 1,620,485$ 1,899,824$ 2,514,468$ 2,720,473$ 2,839,152$ 3,014,615$ 3,639,548$ 4,325,857$ Cash Available Percentage58.34% 57.73% 38.79% 45.76% 60.00% 79.18% 88.32% 92.61% 98.50% 123.77% 152.69% 175.63%Target Cash Balance - 25-40%Page 21Updated 10/10/2016Special Study Session Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Review of Proposed 2017 CIP, LRFMP and Utility RatesPage 48 Financial Management PlanUninsured Loss Fund - This fund covers self-insured workers comp claims, property and liability claim deductibles that are underwritten by the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust.2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Revised Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected ProjectedRevenuesRent RevenueInterest Income 7,000 10,170 10,251 10,333 10,416 10,500 10,583 10,665 10,746 10,825 10,904 Miscellaneous/ Other Revenue 175,000 180,250 185,658 191,227 196,964 202,873 208,959 215,228 221,685 228,335 235,185 Transfers In - - - - - - - - - - Total Revenues182,000$ 190,420$ 195,908$ 201,560$ 207,380$ 213,373$ 219,542$ 225,893$ 232,430$ 239,161$ 246,089$ ExpendituresPersonal Services29,794 30,539 31,302 32,085 32,967 33,956 34,975 36,024 37,105 38,218 39,365 Supplies- - - - - - - - - - Services & Other Charges150,000 154,500 159,135 163,909 168,826 173,891 179,108 184,481 190,016 195,716 201,587 Transfers Out- - - - - - - - - - Total Expenditures179,794$ 185,039$ 190,437$ 195,994$ 201,794$ 207,847$ 214,083$ 220,505$ 227,120$ 233,934$ 240,952$ Incr/(Decr) in Fund Balance2,206$ 5,381$ 5,471$ 5,566$ 5,587$ 5,526$ 5,459$ 5,387$ 5,310$ 5,226$ 5,137$ Fund Balance - Beginning738,674$ 740,880$ 746,261$ 751,731$ 757,297$ 762,884$ 768,410$ 773,869$ 779,256$ 784,566$ 789,793$ Fund Balance - Ending740,880$ 746,261$ 751,731$ 757,297$ 762,884$ 768,410$ 773,869$ 779,256$ 784,566$ 789,793$ 794,930$ Fund Balance Percentage400.39% 391.87% 383.55% 375.28% 367.04% 358.93% 350.95% 343.10% 335.38% 327.78% 320.30%Cash Available at Year End677,994$ 683,375$ 688,846$ 694,411$ 699,998$ 705,524$ 710,983$ 716,370$ 721,680$ 726,907$ 732,044$ Cash Available Percentage366.41% 358.84% 351.46% 344.12% 336.78% 329.56% 322.43% 315.41% 308.50% 301.68% 294.96%Target Cash Balance - Page 23Updated 10/10/2016Special Study Session Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Review of Proposed 2017 CIP, LRFMP and Utility RatesPage 49 Financial Management Plan Benefits Administration Fund - This fund covers the cost of insurance, unemployment, flex leave payouts, and tuition reimbursement.2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Actual Revised Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected ProjectedRevenuesGeneral Property Taxes / HRA Levy200,000 200,000 200,000 300,000 350,000 400,000 450,000 500,000 550,000 600,000 650,000 Intergovernmental64,530 - - - - - - - - - Charges for Services- - - - - - - - - - Interest Income9,151 10,000 8,818 4,683 1,709 (844) (2,975) (4,685) (5,975) (6,846) (7,299) Miscellaneous/ Other Revenue224,883 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 Transfers In- Total Revenues498,564$ 270,000$ 268,818$ 364,683$ 411,709$ 459,156$ 507,025$ 555,315$ 604,025$ 653,154$ 702,701$ Cash OutflowsPublic Safety Disabilitant Ins- - - - - - - - - Self Insurance costs - Sedg54,283 60,000 61,800 63,654 65,564 67,531 69,556 71,643 73,792 76,006 78,286 HOM claims26,021 - - - - - - - - - Unemployment15,665 40,000 41,200 42,436 43,709 45,020 46,371 47,762 49,195 50,671 52,191 General Professional Services71,305 55,000 56,650 58,350 60,100 61,903 63,760 65,673 67,643 69,672 71,763 EMPLOYER 457 CONTRIB- - - - - - - - - - Tuition50,307 60,000 61,800 63,654 65,564 67,531 69,556 71,643 73,792 76,006 78,286 Estimated Cash OutflowsFlex Payout to VEBA54,211 58,211 62,211 66,211 70,211 74,211 78,211 82,211 86,211 90,211 94,211 Retiree Payouts163,909 168,826 173,891 179,108 184,481 190,016 195,716 201,587 207,635 213,864 220,280 Other Separations (non-retiree)81,955 84,413 86,946 89,554 92,241 95,008 97,858 100,794 103,818 106,932 110,140 Total Cash Outflows517,656$ 526,451$ 544,498$ 562,966$ 581,869$ 601,219$ 621,029$ 641,313$ 662,087$ 683,363$ 705,157$ Incr/(Decr) in Fund Balance(19,092)$ (256,451)$ (275,680)$ (198,283)$ (170,160)$ (142,062)$ (114,004)$ (85,998)$ (58,061)$ (30,208)$ (2,456)$ Cash Available at Year End 844,330$ 587,879$ 312,200$ 113,917$ (56,244)$ (198,306)$ (312,309)$ (398,308)$ (456,369)$ (486,577)$ (489,033)$ Cash Available Percentage160.38% 107.97% 55.46% 19.58% -9.35% -31.93% -48.70% -60.16% -66.78% -69.00% -67.22%Target Cash Balance - Page 22Updated 10/10/2016Special Study Session Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Review of Proposed 2017 CIP, LRFMP and Utility RatesPage 50 Special Study Session Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Review of Proposed 2017 CIP, LRFMP and Utility Rates Page 51 Meeting: Economic Development Authority Meeting Date: October 17, 2016 Minutes: 3a UNOFFICIAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA SEPTEMBER 6, 2016 1. Call to Order President Mavity called the meeting to order at 7:25 p.m. Commissioners present: President Anne Mavity, Tim Brausen, Steve Hallfin, Gregg Lindberg, and Susan Sanger. Commissioners absent: Thom Miller and Jake Spano. Staff present: Executive Director (Mr. Harmening), Community Development Director (Mr. Locke), City Attorney (Mr. Mattick), Assistant Zoning Administrator (Mr. Morrison), Senior Planner (Mr. Walther), and Recording Secretary (Ms. Pappas). 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes 3a. Economic Development Authority Meeting Minutes August 15, 2016 It was moved by Commissioner Brausen, seconded by Commissioner Lindberg, to approve the EDA minutes as presented. The motion passed 5-0 (Commissioners Miller and Spano absent). 4. Approval of Agenda It was moved by Commissioner Brausen, seconded by Commissioner Lindberg, to approve the EDA agenda as presented. The motion passed 5-0 (Commissioners Miller and Spano absent). 5. Reports 5a. Approval of EDA Disbursements It was moved by Commissioner Brausen, seconded by Commissioner Lindberg, to approve the EDA Disbursements. The motion passed 5-0 (Commissioners Miller and Spano absent). 6. Old Business - None Economic Development Authority Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 3a) Page 2 Title: Economic Development Authority Meeting Minutes of September 6, 2016 7. New Business 7a. 2017 Preliminary HRA Levy Certification and Budget Adoption. Resolution No. 16-19. Mr. Simon presented the staff report. Commissioner Brausen stated the council has had many discussions on this topic and he supports it. Commissioner Lindberg stated this will provide many great opportunities for revenue streams. Commissioner Mavity clarified that the preliminary rate can be decreased, but not increased for final property tax levies. It was noted the next step will be to present the revised 2016 budget, and 2017 budgets, final tax levies (city and HRA), and 2017-2026 CIP to the council at the Dec. 19, 2016 city council meeting. It was moved by Commissioner Hallfin, seconded by Commissioner Brausen, to waive the reading and adopt EDA Resolution No. 16-19, authorizing the proposed levy of special benefit levy pursuant to Minnesota Statues Section 469.033, Subdivision 6, and approval of the 2017 Preliminary HRA Levy and Budget for fiscal year 2017. The motion passed 5-0 (Commissioners Miller and Spano absent). 8. Communications - None 9. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 7:35 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, Secretary Anne Mavity, President Meeting: Economic Development Authority Meeting Date: October 17, 2016 Consent Agenda Item: 5a EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Approval of EDA Disbursements RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to accept for filing EDA Disbursement Claims for the period of August 27 through October 7, 2016. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the EDA desire to approve EDA disbursements in accordance with Article V – Administration of Finances, of the EDA Bylaws? SUMMARY: The Finance Division prepares this report on a monthly basis for the EDA to review and approve. The attached reports show both EDA disbursements paid by physical check and those by wire transfer or Automated Clearing House (ACH) when applicable. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Review and approval of the information follows the EDA’s Bylaws and provides another layer of oversight to further ensure fiscal stewardship. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: EDA Disbursements Prepared by: Kari Mahan, Accounting Clerk Reviewed by: Tim Simon, Chief Financial Officer 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:19:04R55CKS2LOGIS400V 1Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 380.00CITIZENS INDEPENDENT BANK DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A TRAINING 380.00 16,252.82DMD PROPERTIES LLC MCGARVEY COFFEE SITE BOND PRINCIPAL 13,747.18MCGARVEY COFFEE SITE BOND INTEREST 30,000.00 285.62EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC ELIOT PARK TIF DIST G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 285.63WEST END TIF DIST G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 285.63ELLIPSE ON EXC TIF DIST G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 285.63PARK CENTER HOUSING G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 285.63CSM TIF DIST G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 285.63MILL CITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 285.63PARK COMMONS G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 285.63EDGEWOOD TIF DIST G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 285.63ELMWOOD VILLAGE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 285.63WOLFE LAKE COMMERCIAL TIF G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 285.63AQUILA COMMONS G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 285.58HWY 7 BUSINESS CENTER G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,427.50 2,300.00FORECAST PUBLIC ART PUBLIC ART PUBLIC ART DEDICATION 2,300.00 378.00GREEN HORIZONS 7015 WALKER-REYNOLDS WELD PROP LAND MAINTENANCE 408.004601 HWY 7 PROP ACQUISITION LAND MAINTENANCE 256.80MCGARVEY COFFEE SITE LAND MAINTENANCE 860.00HWY 7 & LOUISIANA LAND MAINTENANCE 1,902.80 505.00HUBER UNIVERSAL SERVICES LLC MCGARVEY COFFEE SITE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 505.00 228.35KENNEDY & GRAVEN SWLRT DEVELOPMENT LEGAL SERVICES 95.004900 EXC BLVD TIF DIST G&A LEGAL SERVICES 450.00WEST END TIF DIST G&A LEGAL SERVICES 506.50DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A LEGAL SERVICES 918.00PARK COMMONS G&A LEGAL SERVICES 95.00SHOREHAM TIF DIST G&A LEGAL SERVICES 2,292.85 Economic Development Authority Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approval of EDA Disbursements Page 2 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:19:04R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 2Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 6,000.00LOCKRIDGE GRINDAL NAUEN PLLP DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A LEGAL SERVICES 6,000.00 6,000.00MUSICANT, MAX DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6,000.00 19.91SELLS, NANCY DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A MEETING EXPENSE 19.91 100.00ST LOUIS PARK SUNRISE ROTARY DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 100.00 120.00WRAP CITY GRAPHICS 4601 HWY 7 PROP ACQUISITION LAND MAINTENANCE 120.00MCGARVEY COFFEE SITE LAND MAINTENANCE 240.00 Report Totals 53,168.06 Economic Development Authority Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approval of EDA Disbursements Page 3 Meeting: Economic Development Authority Meeting Date: October 17, 2016 Action Agenda Item: 7a EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Assignment and Subordination Agreement – ACSLP, LLC (TPI Hospitality/AC Hotel by Marriott) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution approving the Assignment and Subordination Agreement with ACSLP, LLC (TPI Hospitality) and Johnson Bank relative to the Amended and Restated Contract for Private Redevelopment with Central Park West, LLC. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the EDA find that the proposed Assignment and Subordination Agreement with TPI Hospitality and its lender, Johnson Bank, is in conformance with the Amended and Restated Contract for Private Redevelopment with Central Park West, LLC and to be in the best interest of the city and its residents? SUMMARY: On April 4, 2016, ACSLP, LLC (TPI Hospitality) received its final zoning approvals for the hotel (AC Hotel by Marriott) required under the Amended and Restated Contract for Private Redevelopment with Central Park West, LLC. As a requirement of the construction financing for the project, TPI Hospitality’s lender, Johnson Bank, has requested that the EDA and City approve an Assignment and Subordination Agreement of Amended and Restated Contract for Private Redevelopment. The proposed Assignment and Subordination is primarily an agreement by the EDA and City to subordinate their rights under the Contract to the rights of Johnson Bank under TPI Hospitality’s construction loan. The developer is also collaterally assigning its rights under the Contract to Johnson Bank. This does not mean that the lender has any of the rights or obligations under the Contract, rather that the lender will have those rights if the hotel developer commits an event of default under the Loan Agreement (see paragraph 3 of the Assignment and Subordination). There are two provisions of particular note within the proposed Agreement: Paragraph 7 provides that although the City and EDA have waived the required date for commencement of construction of the hotel, they reserve the right to require a 4th Amendment to the Contract if construction is delayed past January 1, 2017. Paragraph 9 provides that the rights of the EDA under the Assessment Agreement for the hotel are NOT subordinated to the Mortgage. The proposed Agreement is similar to other subordination agreements the EDA has approved previously. The proposed Agreement has been reviewed by the EDA’s legal counsel who recommends its approval. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: None VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion Resolution of Approval Assignment and Subordination Prepared by: Greg Hunt, Economic Development Coordinator Reviewed by: Michele Schnitker, Housing Supervisor/Deputy Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, EDA Executive Director and City Manager Economic Development Authority Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 7a) Page 2 Title: Assignment and Subordination Agreement – ACSLP, LLC (TPI Hospitality/AC Hotel by Marriott) DISCUSSION BACKGROUND: The hotel required within the Central Park West redevelopment (specifically Phase III of the Third Amendment to the Amended and Restated Contract for Private Redevelopment with Central Park West, LLC and assigned to RISLP, LLC and subsequently renamed ACSLP, LLC (TPI Hospitality) received its final zoning approvals on April 4, 2016. The developer, TPI Hospitality, has subsequently been refining the building’s interior design with the hotel franchise, AC Hotel by Marriott, and securing the project’s construction financing. TPI Hospitality has informed staff that it expects to close on its financing with Johnson Bank by the end of October and commence construction shortly thereafter. The project is expected to be completed by February 2018 which is approximately 6 months later than the required completion date specified in the Redevelopment Contract. Paragraph 7 within the proposed Assignment and Subordination Agreement provides that although the City and EDA have waived the required date for commencement of construction of the hotel, they reserve the right to require a 4th Amendment to the Contract if construction is delayed past January 1, 2017. Economic Development Authority Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 7a) Page 3 Title: Assignment and Subordination Agreement – ACSLP, LLC (TPI Hospitality/AC Hotel by Marriott) ST. LOUIS PARK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY RESOLUTION NO. 16-____ RESOLUTION APPROVING AN ASSIGNMENT AND SUBORDINATION OF AMENDED AND RESTATED CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE REDEVELOPMENT BETWEEN THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK, ACSLP, LLC, AND JOHNSON BANK BE IT RESOLVED By the Board of Commissioners ("Board") of the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority ("Authority") as follows: Section 1. Recitals. 1.01. The Authority currently administers its Redevelopment Project No. 1 ("Project") pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047 ("HRA Act"), and within the Project has established the West End Tax Increment Financing District (“TIF District”). 1.02. The City of St. Louis Park (the “City”), Authority and ACSLP, LLC (the “Redeveloper,” as Assignee pursuant to an Assignment and Assumption of Redevelopment Contract dated May 8, 2015) are parties to that Amended and Restated Contract for Private Redevelopment dated as of May 17, 2010, as amended by a First Amendment to Amended and Restated Contract for Private Redevelopment dated as of November 21, 2011, a Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Contract for Private Redevelopment dated as of May 8, 2015, and a Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Contract for Private Redevelopment dated as of May 2, 2016 (as so amended, the “Contract”). Pursuant to the Contract, the Redeveloper is obligated to construct a hotel (“CPW Phase III”) on certain property within the TIF District (the “Redevelopment Property”). 1.03. The Redeveloper proposes to enter into a loan agreement with Johnson Bank (the “Lender”) for certain mortgage financing related to CPW Phase III to be constructed on the Redevelopment Property, and has requested that the Authority and City approve an Assignment and Subordination of Contract for Private Redevelopment (the “Assignment”) as authorized pursuant to Section 7.2 of the Contract. 1.04. The Board has reviewed the Assignment and finds that the approval and execution of the Assignment are in the best interest of the City and its residents. Section 2. Authority Approval; Other Proceedings. 2.01. The Assignment as presented to the Board is hereby in all respects approved, subject to modifications that do not alter the substance of the transaction and that are approved by the President and Executive Director, provided that execution of the Assignment by such officials shall be conclusive evidence of approval. 2.02. The President and Executive Director are hereby authorized to execute on behalf of the Authority the Assignment and any other documents requiring execution by the Authority in order to carry out the transaction described in the Assignment. Economic Development Authority Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 7a) Page 4 Title: Assignment and Subordination Agreement – ACSLP, LLC (TPI Hospitality/AC Hotel by Marriott) 2.03. Authority staff and consultants are authorized to take any actions necessary to carry out the intent of this resolution. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the Economic Development Authority October 17, 2016 Thomas K. Harmening, Executive Director Anne Mavity, President Attest Melissa Kennedy, Secretary Economic Development Authority Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 7a) Page 5 Title: Assignment and Subordination Agreement – ACSLP, LLC (TPI Hospitality/AC Hotel by Marriott) ASSIGNMENT AND SUBORDINATION OF AMENDED AND RESTATED CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE REDEVELOPMENT THIS ASSIGNMENT AND SUBORDINATION OF AMENDED AND RESTATED CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE REDEVELOPMENT (this “Agreement”), is made and entered into as of the 17th day of October, 2016, by and among the CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the “City”); ST. LOUIS PARK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, a public body corporate and politic organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the “Authority”); ACSLP, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (the “Redeveloper”), and JOHNSON BANK, a Wisconsin banking corporation (the “Lender”). W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, the City, Authority and the Redeveloper (as Assignee pursuant to an Assignment and Assumption of Redevelopment Contract dated May 8, 2015 and recorded in the office of the Registrar of Titles of Hennepin County, Minnesota as Document No. T05254079) are parties to that Amended and Restated Contract for Private Redevelopment dated as of May 17, 2010 and filed as Document No. 4781478, as amended by a First Amendment to Amended and Restated Contract for Private Redevelopment dated as of November 21, 2011 and filed as Document No. 4913709, a Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Contract for Private Redevelopment dated as of May 8, 2015 and filed as Document No. 5254066, and a Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Contract for Private Redevelopment dated as of May 2, 2016 and filed as Document No. 5354383, and as the same may be further amended or modified from time to time (the “Development Contract”); WHEREAS, all capitalized terms used herein, unless otherwise defined herein, shall have the meanings given them in the Development Contract; and WHEREAS, the Development Contract contemplates certain development of the Redevelopment Property which is to include the construction of Central Park West Phase III of certain Minimum Improvements, consisting of a 120-150 room hotel (the “Hotel Phase”) on the real property located in St. Louis Park, Minnesota, legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof (the “Hotel Parcel”); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of that certain Loan Agreement dated __________ ____, 2016 by and between the Lender and Redeveloper (the “Loan Agreement”), the Lender has agreed to make a $19,250,000 construction loan (the “Loan”) to the Redeveloper; and Economic Development Authority Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 7a) Page 6 Title: Assignment and Subordination Agreement – ACSLP, LLC (TPI Hospitality/AC Hotel by Marriott) WHEREAS, the Redeveloper has executed in favor of Lender that certain Promissory Note dated ______________ ____, 2016 in the original principal amount of $19,250,000 (the “Note”), evidencing the original principal amount of the Loan; and WHEREAS, the Note is secured by that certain Construction Mortgage, Security Agreement, Assignment of Rents and Leases and Fixture Financing Statement encumbering the Mixed-Use Project dated _________ ___, 2016 (the “Mortgage”), executed by the Redeveloper in favor of the Lender and filed of record in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota on ______________ as Document No. _____________, and in the office of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota, on ______________ as Document No. _______________; and WHEREAS, the Lender has required, as an express condition to extending the Loan to Redeveloper pursuant to the Loan Agreement, (a) that the Redeveloper assign to the Lender its rights under the Development Contract with regard to the Hotel Phase to secure the obligations of the Redeveloper to the Lender under the Loan, (b) that the Development Contract be subordinated to the Mortgage, and (c) that the Authority agree to certain other matters, all as more fully contained herein. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows: 1. The Redeveloper hereby assigns to the Lender all of its right, title and interest under and pursuant to the Development Contract as to the Hotel Phase only (the “Hotel Rights”) to secure the Redeveloper’s obligations under the Loan. 2. The Redeveloper hereby represents and warrants to the Lender that Redeveloper has made no prior assignments of the Development Contract, that the Development Contract is a valid enforceable agreement and that none of the Redeveloper, the City, nor the Authority is in default thereunder and that all covenants, conditions and agreements have been performed as required therein, except those not to be performed until after the date hereof. The Redeveloper hereby agrees not to sell, assign, pledge, mortgage or otherwise transfer or encumber its interest in the Hotel Phase Rights as long as this Agreement is in effect. The Redeveloper hereby irrevocably constitutes and appoints the Lender as its attorney-in-fact to demand, receive and enforce the Redeveloper’s rights with respect to the Hotel Phase Rights for and on behalf of and in the name of the Redeveloper or, at the option of the Lender, in the name of the Lender, with the same force and effect as the Redeveloper could do if this Agreement had not been made. 3. This Agreement shall constitute a perfected, absolute and present assignment, provided that Lender shall have no right under this Agreement to enforce the provisions of the Development Contract with regard to the Hotel Phase Rights or exercise any rights or remedies under this Agreement until an Event of Default (as that term is defined in the Loan Agreement) shall occur and be continuing. 4. Upon the occurrence of an Event of Default, the Lender may, without affecting any of its rights or remedies against the Redeveloper under any other instrument, document or agreement, exercise its rights under this Agreement as the Redeveloper’s attorney-in-fact in any manner permitted by law and in addition the Lender shall have the right to exercise Economic Development Authority Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 7a) Page 7 Title: Assignment and Subordination Agreement – ACSLP, LLC (TPI Hospitality/AC Hotel by Marriott) and enforce any and all rights and remedies available after a default to a secured party under the Uniform Commercial Code as adopted in the State of Minnesota. If notice to the Redeveloper of any intended disposition of collateral or of any intended action is required by law in any particular instance, such notice shall be commercially reasonable if given in writing at least ten (10) days prior to the intended disposition or other action. 5. The City and Authority hereby consent and agree to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. The City and Authority further represent to the Lender that the Development Contract is a valid agreement enforceable in accordance with its terms and that none of the City, the Authority or the Redeveloper is in default thereunder and that all covenants, conditions and agreements have been performed as required therein, except those not to be performed until after the date hereof. 6. The Authority hereby acknowledges and agrees that the Authority has received from the Redeveloper the Construction Plans for the Hotel Phase and has approved such Construction Plans for all purposes of the Development Contract as required by Section 4.2 of the Development Contract. 7. The City and Authority hereby acknowledge and agree that the requirement in Section 4.3(a) of the Development Contract regarding commencement of construction of the Hotel Phase has been waived by the City and Authority as of the date hereof based on continued good-faith progress by the Redeveloper toward commencement of construction of the Hotel Phase. The City and Authority further agree to work with the Redeveloper in good faith to negotiate and execute an amendment to the Development Contract, providing for extended commencement and completion dates of the Hotel Phase, in the event that commencement of construction of the Hotel Phase is delayed beyond January 1, 2017. 8. The City and Authority hereby acknowledge and agree that the Mortgage and the Loan Agreement have been approved by the City and Authority and that the defined term “Mortgage” as set forth in Section 1.1 of the Development Contract shall hereinafter include the Mortgage and any and all amendments, supplements, modifications, renewals, extensions or replacements thereto, thereof or therefor. 9. The City and Authority hereby expressly agree and acknowledge that the Development Contract, including, without limitation, all terms, conditions, provisions and obligations set forth therein, is subject to and subordinate to the lien of the Mortgage, but solely with respect to the Hotel Phase; provided, however, that pursuant to Section 7.2(a)(iii), the rights of the Authority as to the Assessment Agreement for the Hotel Phase shall not be subordinated. 10. Pursuant to Section 5.2 of the Development Contract, the Authority acknowledges that the rights of the Authority with respect to the receipt and application of any proceeds of insurance awards with respect to the Hotel Phase shall, in all respects, be subject and subordinate to the rights of the Lender under the Mortgage. 11. The Authority hereby agrees to provide the Lender with copies of any notice of default given under the Development Contract, and that the Lender shall have the right, but not the obligation, to cure any such default on behalf of the Redeveloper within the time period specified in the Development Contract. Economic Development Authority Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 7a) Page 8 Title: Assignment and Subordination Agreement – ACSLP, LLC (TPI Hospitality/AC Hotel by Marriott) 12. Pursuant to Section 7.2(a)(ii) of the Development Contract, the Lender hereby agrees to provide the Authority with copies of any notice of default given to the Redeveloper under the Loan Agreement, and that the Authority shall have the right, but not the obligation, to cure any such default on behalf of the Redeveloper within such cure periods as are available to the Redeveloper as provided in the Loan Agreement and Mortgage. 13. The parties hereto hereby agree that no change or amendment having a material adverse effect on the Hotel Phase shall be made to any terms of the Development Contract without the prior written consent of the Lender. 14. This Agreement can be waived, modified, amended, terminated or discharged only explicitly in a writing signed by all parties hereto. A waiver by the Lender shall be effective only in a specific instance and for the specific purpose given. Mere delay or failure to act shall not preclude the exercise or enforcement of any of the Lender’s rights or remedies hereunder. All rights and remedies of the Lender shall be cumulative and shall be exercised singularly or concurrently, at the Lender’s option, and any exercise or enforcement of any one such right or remedy shall neither be a condition to nor bar the exercise or enforcement of any other. 15. No provision of this Agreement shall be deemed or construed to alter, amend or modify, in any way, the rights and obligations of the City or Authority contained in the Development Contract. 16. The City, the Authority and the Redeveloper acknowledge that the Lender is not a party to the Development Contract, and the Lender shall not, by executing this Agreement or by exercising its rights and remedies hereunder or under the Mortgage or the Loan Agreement, incur any obligations of any kind or otherwise be or become liable to the City, Authority or anyone, whether under the Development Contract or otherwise; nor shall the City or Authority, by executing this Agreement, incur any obligations of any kind or otherwise be or become liable to the Redeveloper or the Lender or anyone, whether under the Mortgage, the Loan Agreement or otherwise. 17. The City and Authority hereby represent to the Lender that the making, execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement by the City and Authority have been authorized by all necessary action of the City and Authority, and that this Agreement is the valid and binding obligation of the City and Authority, enforceable against the City and Authority and their successors and assigns in accordance with its terms. 18. Any notices, communications and waivers under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be (a) delivered in person, (b) mailed, postage prepaid, either by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, or (c) by overnight express carrier, addressed in each case as follows: To Lender: Johnson Bank 100 South Fifth Street, Suite 1210 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Attention: Michael Fitzpatrick Economic Development Authority Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 7a) Page 9 Title: Assignment and Subordination Agreement – ACSLP, LLC (TPI Hospitality/AC Hotel by Marriott) To Redeveloper: ACSLP, LLC 103 15th Avenue NW Suite 200 Willmar, Minnesota 56201 Attention: ______________ To City: City of St. Louis Park 5005 Minnetonka Boulevard St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 Attention: City Manager To Authority: St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority 5005 Minnetonka Boulevard St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 Attention: Executive Director or to any other address as to any of the parties hereto, as such party shall designate in a written notice to the other party hereto. All notices sent pursuant to the terms of this Paragraph shall be deemed received (i) if personally delivered, then on the date of delivery, (ii) if sent by overnight, express carrier, then on the next federal banking day immediately following the day sent, or (iii) if sent by registered or certified mail, then on the earlier of the third federal banking day following the day sent or when actually received. 19. This Agreement shall be binding upon the City, the Authority, the Redeveloper and the Lender and their respective successors and assigns and shall inure to the benefit of and may be enforced by the Lender and its successors and assigns, including the purchaser in any foreclosure sale or the transferee in any transfer in lieu of foreclosure of the Hotel Phase. 20. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. 21. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts and by the different parties hereto on separate counterparts and each such counterpart shall be deemed to be an original, but all such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same Agreement. Economic Development Authority Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 7a) Page 10 Title: Assignment and Subordination Agreement – ACSLP, LLC (TPI Hospitality/AC Hotel by Marriott) IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have made and entered into this Agreement as of the day and year first above written. CITY: CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK, a Minnesota municipal corporation By: Its: Mayor By: Its: City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of October, 2016, by Jake Spano and Thomas Harmening, the Mayor and City Manager, respectively, of the CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation. Notary Public Economic Development Authority Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 7a) Page 11 Title: Assignment and Subordination Agreement – ACSLP, LLC (TPI Hospitality/AC Hotel by Marriott) AUTHORITY: ST. LOUIS PARK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, a public body corporate and politic organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota By: Its: President By: Its: Executive Director STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of October, 2016, by Anne Mavity and Thomas Harmening, the President and Executive Director, respectively, of the ST. LOUIS PARK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, a public body corporate and politic organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota, on behalf of the Authority. Notary Public Economic Development Authority Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 7a) Page 12 Title: Assignment and Subordination Agreement – ACSLP, LLC (TPI Hospitality/AC Hotel by Marriott) REDEVELOPER: ACSLP, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company By: Name: Its: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF ___________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ______ day of ____________, 2016, by __________________, the ______________________ of ACSLP, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, for and on behalf of such limited liability company. ______________________________ Notary Public Economic Development Authority Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 7a) Page 13 Title: Assignment and Subordination Agreement – ACSLP, LLC (TPI Hospitality/AC Hotel by Marriott) LENDER: JOHNSON BANK, a Wisconsin banking corporation By: ______________________________ Name: Its: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF ___________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of ___________________, 2016, by ___________________________, the ________________________ of JOHNSON BANK, a Wisconsin bankingcCorporation, for and on behalf of such corporation. ______________________________ Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY: Kennedy & Graven, Chartered (MNI) 200 South Sixth Street, Suite 470 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 (612) 337-9300 Economic Development Authority Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 7a) Page 14 Title: Assignment and Subordination Agreement – ACSLP, LLC (TPI Hospitality/AC Hotel by Marriott) EXHIBIT A Legal Description of Hotel Parcel The real property situated in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described as follows: Lot 3, Block 1, Central Park West P.U.D. No. 121 Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: October 17, 2016 Presentation: 2a EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Recognition of Donations RECOMMENDED ACTION: Mayor to announce and express thanks and appreciation for the following donations being accepted at the meeting and listed on the Consent Agenda: From Amount For International Society of Arboriculture Up to $2,000 Expenses for Jim Vaughan, Natural Resources Coordinator, to attend the 2016 International Society of Arboriculture Leadership Workshop in Champaign, Illinois Athletic Business Up to $2,000 Expenses for Jason Eisold, Rec Center Manager, to attend the Athletic Business Show VIP Hosted Buyer Program in Orlando, Florida Estate of Alice Trainer $1,200 Improvements to Lamplighter Park Estate of Alice Trainer $1,200 The Fire Department to be used at their discretion Prepared by: Debbie Fischer, Administrative Services Office Assistant Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: October 17, 2016 Minutes: 3a UNOFFICIAL MINUTES CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL STUDY SESSION ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA SEPTEMBER 6, 2016 The meeting convened at 5:45 p.m. Councilmembers present: Tim Brausen, Steve Hallfin, Gregg Lindberg, Anne Mavity, Thom Miller, and Susan Sanger. Councilmembers Absent: Mayor Spano. Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), Chief Financial Officer (Mr. Simon), Deputy City Manager/Human Resources Director (Ms. Deno), Director of Community Development (Mr. Locke), Finance Manager (Mr. Ebensteiner), Assistant Zoning Administrator (Mr. Morrison), Housing Supervisor, (Ms. Schnitker), Operations Superintendent (Mr. Hanson), and Recording Secretary (Ms. Pappas). Guest: Brent Wittenberg, Vice President at Marquette Advisors. 1. 2017 Budget Update Mr. Harmening stated the last time the budget was discussed, council directed staff to refine several items. Today the council will be asked to review the preliminary tax levy and the proposed utility rate adjustment plan, along with the solid waste and organics program. Mr. Simon noted that council had discussed a preliminary levy of 6.92%, and since that time staff has made adjustments to the building permit revenues to bring the overall levy down to 6.5%. As in past years, the 2017 preliminary property tax levy adopted by council on September 19, 2016 can be decreased but cannot be increased after that date. Mr. Simon noted that the city was recently awarded a grant in the amount of $380,000 (split over two years) in order to hire two additional firefighters. He added that staff will work on building this into the budget so that in year three, the council doesn’t have the $190,000 increase once the grant funds expire. Some of the capacity will be built into the levy over the next two years. Mr. Simon added that based on current and future infrastructure needs, the HRA Levy is recommended to be set at the maximum allowed 0.0185% of estimated market value for the 2017 budget, which is consistent with previous years. This levy is earmarked to pay back a loan from the Development Fund that helped cash flow the city’s obligation for the Highway 7 and Louisiana interchange project and is expected to be paid off by 2019. By law, these funds could also be used for other housing and redevelopment purposes, but considering the significant infrastructure needs within the city, the proceeds have not been used for housing. Therefore, staff has calculated the maximum HRA Levy for 2017 to be $1,086,461 based on valuation data from Hennepin County. This is an increase of $75,253 or 7.44% from 2016. Staff is recommending the 2017 Preliminary HRA Levy be set at the maximum. This information will be provided on the city’s website, and an email provided for any questions that arise from residents. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 3a) Page 2 Title: Special Study Session Minutes of September 6, 2016 Mayor Pro Tem Hallfin asked if these dollars could go into the SWLT project. Mr. Harmening stated the funds are restricted to only be used for infrastructure projects. Mr. Simon stated that enterprise funds, as related to a water project, could be repaid with utility rates in the 7th year of a 10-year rate plan, in order to increase the base charge and stabilize revenue fluctuations. Mr. Harmening added that the city is pursuing state funding on water projects. Currently this is noted in the capital plan as unfunded. Councilmember Lindberg stated the city should be more aggressive on the water issue. Mr. Simon stated the city can have flexibility with the bond, and there are no bond issues anticipated related to storm water utility. Also, the city can do internal borrowing with funds related to the water issue. Mr. Harmening added this will include the storm water changes at Bass Lake. Mr. Harmening explained the organics program, stating the city is committed to having residents recycle and compost more as part of the waste program. He pointed out that there are one or two residents that utilize the 540 gallon container – the largest container available – for their waste removal. Councilmember Sanger asked if these residents have home-based businesses and happen to generate large amounts of waste. Mr. Harmening stated that is probably the case. Councilmember Mavity stated the city will charge residents for the containers they want for their waste removal. Councilmember Brausen agreed and stated he is in favor of the proposed rate structure. Councilmember Sanger noted that some residents may not have room for the large waste containers, and the city might want to adopt the use of smaller carts to help residents save space, adding this might be a bigger incentive. Mr. Hanson stated staff can look into this, but added that they have done the research and costs would rise dramatically. Mr. Harmening stated this is a great opportunity to look at waste removal contracts and make changes in the future. He added the council seems to be in favor of the organics program where the cost can be built into the rates. He added there is still an opt-in option and if residents need a yard waste cart, the city will provide it to them. Similar to the program Minneapolis uses, rathe r than distributing bags, the city would give bags through 2017. After that, residents would need to purchase organics bags. However, the city would also provide residents with a starter kit and an allotment of bags. Councilmember Miller noted the organics bags that can be purchased at retail stores are not as good as the bags provided by the city. He added we would not want residents to get frustrated with the bags and then quit the program. Mr. Hanson noted the city is looking at a bag voucher system for residents also. Councilmember Brausen added, at some point the city may want to make the organics program obligatory, rather than an opt-in option. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 3a) Page 3 Title: Special Study Session Minutes of September 6, 2016 Councilmember Lindberg added again there is a practical implication as some folks will have an issue with storing three waste containers in their garage, and containers can also block alleys. This will be a practical issue the city will need to be aware of. Councilmember Sanger added that the city may need to change the ordinance that states residents must keep their waste carts in their garage. The council agreed they were comfortable with reducing the levy to 6.5% on Sept. 19, 2016. Councilmember Brausen stated he did not see anything in the budget about affordable housing, adding that now with the grant for firefighters, the city should start to look at housing issues and affordable housing for seniors. Councilmembers Lindberg and Mavity agreed. Councilmember Lindberg also asked about additional funding for the city to take over the removal of diseased boulevard trees. Mr. Harmening noted the city used to pay 100% of this cost, but now pays 50%. He said staff can look into this, but the council decided to lower this amount a few years back, and it is difficult to go back and forth on the issue. Councilmember Lindberg noted that Texas Avenue continues to be an issue. Councilmember Sanger stated further discussions on sidewalk snow removal have been requested by residents, adding this topic may also present cost implications for the budget. Councilmember Miller agreed. Mayor Pro Tem Hallfin added the city may want to look into having volunteer coordinators handle snow removal and offered this idea as a partial solution. Councilmember Miller added it would be interesting to see how many households would ask for this service. Councilmember Sanger added that the number of households would not be small and stated that of the non-profits that do provide this service, many are not available to shovel in St. Louis Park. She added she does not think the volunteer solution is the best, noting another solution may be special service areas within the city, where special districts of the city are plowed by the city along the whole block. Next steps related to the budget will be to have staff prepare information for the September 19 council meeting where preliminary levies will be adopted. The EDA and council will adopt the HRA levy. Again, levies can be decreased, but not increased, for final property tax levies at the September 19 meeting. The revised 2016 budget, 2017 budgets, final tax levies (city and HRA), and 2017-2026 CIP will be adopted at the Dec. 19, 2016 city council meeting. 2. Multi-Family Development Rental/Condo Market and 2016 Semi-Annual Housing Programs Activity Report Mr. Harmening noted that several weeks ago Mayor Spano suggested a discussion on multi-family rental housing and condo market reviews, including historical; program descriptions; affordable housing; current trends; and the outlook for the Twin Cities, as well as St. Louis Park specifically. Ms. Schnitker introduced Brent Wittenberg, Vice President Marquette Advisors, to present a housing report which will inform the council as they consider future development of the city. Marquette Advisors specializes in development feasibility analysis, spanning all property types and serving both private and public sector clients, developers, lenders, and government agencies. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 3a) Page 4 Title: Special Study Session Minutes of September 6, 2016 Mr. Wittenberg stated the Twin Cities has one of the strongest markets in the county currently, with a strong economy, job growth, in-migration, demographics, and lifestyle of renters vs. buyers. He noted the Twin Cities continues to see a steady growth rate in rentals, with 11,000 new units, and is enjoying a healthy market overall, with steady rent growth. He added, however, a slow- down is coming, which will involve market adjustments. Mr. Wittenberg stated that in the last 10 years, over 15,000 rental units have been developed, and people are starting to rent for a variety of reasons. Urban markets led the way initially, but now there are new units in the suburbs, also, with a high concentration in the southwest and south metro, where there are more jobs and connectivity, along with the potential of SWLRT soon. Mr. Wittenberg stated that renting makes more sense for some from an economic standpoint, especially people living a more mobile lifestyle. He added this also depends on the market and varies when people consider renting and buying. Currently, millennials are renting at high rates. Additionally, active baby boomers and empty nesters are noting that while they are interested in renting, the two-bedroom, low square footage units are not large enough for them, so many are opting to stay in their homes as long as possible. Councilmember Brausen stated that 40% will be 65 and over soon, and St. Louis Park does not have a product in place for them at this time. Councilmember Sanger stated, however, do not assume seniors want to live in senior living apartments. Mr. Wittenberg stated apartment demand is tied to job growth, and more young people are taking new jobs in the Twin Cities and renting. This, along with low unemployment, is fueling the rental boom at this time. The millennials continue to have a major impact on the apartment market, while 25-30 year olds are starting to want a quieter lifestyle and will begin to purchase homes. Also, young couples and families are renting larger homes and townhomes rather than apartments. Councilmember Sanger stated the city is not addressing demographic of people with children who may want to live in apartments. Councilmember Mavity added that with the major barrier on condos and the liability issues that sit with builders, developers are not building condos and townhomes. She stated the state law is prohibitive, and it needs to change in order to provide more choices for young families and others who want to rent townhomes and condos vs. apartments. Councilmember Sanger added that if we don’t have families with school age children living here, we won’t be able to keep all of our schools open. And if we don’t have a good school district, this community dies. She asked how the city can make our housing more attractive for families. Mr. Wittenberg added there are property developers and owners purchasing rentals, such as Meadowbrook, and remodeling B and C products, which runs the risk of cities not having affordable housing. This, along with a home ownership market slow down due to young people having college loans, will also warrant the need for more rental housing. Additionally, there is a preference for living in the city or first ring suburbs and a real demand for townhomes for rent and for sale. With the laws inhibiting new construction of condos, there are fewer than 200 new condos in the metro area over the last five years, and these are in high demand. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 3a) Page 5 Title: Special Study Session Minutes of September 6, 2016 Councilmember Mavity stated she hoped for more discussion on this topic, and there is also a group of affordable housing activists who would like an audience with the council. She noted we have asked the City Attorney to follow up with the Housing Justice Center and asked if the city can offer any financial engagement in order to hold rents down for the long term. She reiterated the need for further discussion on affordable housing. Ms. Schnitker added that the SWLRT Housing Committee is discussing affordable housing in the Twin Cities and that this is a regional and national issue. This group includes members from Hennepin County, Met Council, MN Housing, and MN Housing Preservation, and representatives from a number of other cities, all of which are bringing ideas to the table and exploring options. Councilmember Mavity added she is feeling a sense of urgency on this topic and wants the city to stay ahead on this as it is fast moving, especially as it relates to affordable housing at Meadowbrook. Mr. Harmening stated if the council would like housing advocates to come in and speak also, staff can set that up. He noted another conversation related to this topic will be set up in the next month or two. The meeting adjourned at 7:20 p.m. Written Reports provided and documented for recording purposes only: 3. Proposed Charter Amendments Related to Municipal Primary Elections and Candidate Filing Requirements ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Jake Spano, Mayor Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: October 17, 2016 Minutes: 3b UNOFFICIAL MINUTES CITY COUNCIL MEETING ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA SEPTEMBER 6, 2016 1. Call to Order Mayor Pro Tem Hallfin called the meeting to order at 7:40 p.m. Councilmembers present: Tim Brausen, Steve Hallfin, Gregg Lindberg, Anne Mavity, and Susan Sanger. Councilmembers absent: Thom Miller and Mayor Jake Spano. Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), City Attorney (Mr. Mattick), Engineering Director (Ms. Heiser), Director of Community Development (Mr. Locke), Assistant Zoning Administrator (Mr. Morrison), Planning and Zoning Supervisor (Mr. Walthers) and Recording Secretary (Ms. Pappas). 1a. Pledge of Allegiance 1b. Roll Call 2. Presentations 2a. Best Friends Day – Twin Cities Strut Your Mutt Proclamation Mayor Pro Tem Hallfin read a proclamation recognizing Animal Society’s Best Friends Day and the Twin Cities Strut Your Mutt event being held at Wolfe Park on Sept. 11, 2016. Meg McCormick, a 30-year St. Louis Park resident, along with other members of the committee, accepted the award and stated they appreciate the city’s support on this endeavor. 2b. Retirement Recognition Resolution for Police Officer Terry Reuvers Mayor Pro Tem Hallfin read a resolution and presented a plaque to retiring Police Officer Terry Reuvers, who has over 30 years of service with the city. Mayor Pro Tem Hallfin thanked Officer Reuvers for his contributions over the years and noted his appreciation of all he has done for the city. Officer Reuvers stated it has been an honor to work for the city of St. Louis Park, and he will miss the officers he has worked with over the years. Mr. Harmening added that he will miss Officer Reuvers. He stated Officer Reuvers is great with the public, and the city has come to admire him. 3. Approval of Minutes 3a. Study Session Meeting Minutes of July 25, 2016 Councilmember Sanger noted that a change on page 9 should read: “…presented at a study session last July and since then, most recently in March…” City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 3b) Page 2 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of September 6, 2016 3b. City Council Meeting Minutes of August 1, 2016 3c. Study Session Meeting Minutes of August 8, 2016 Councilmember Lindberg noted on page 7, a change should be made in the 5th paragraph down to read:”many comments”…instead of “many positive comments”. 3d. Special Study Session Meeting Minutes of August 15, 2016 Councilmember Sanger noted on page 4, a change should be made to read: “Auto Ave. sidewalks are not plowed by the city, but those on Minnetonka Blvd. are, even though they all lead to the same bus stop.” 3e. City Council Meeting Minutes of August 15, 2016 Councilmember Sanger noted a correction in Section 8b, paragraph 3, which should read: “The 50/50 requirement was so that patrons are likely to eat while they consume alcohol so that they may be less likely to leave the premises and drive drunk.” It was moved by Councilmember Brausen, seconded by Councilmember Sanger, to approve all of the above Meeting Minutes with the changes noted. The motion passed 5-0 (Mayor Spano and Councilmember Miller absent). 4. Approval of Agenda and Items on Consent Calendar 4a. Accept for filing City Disbursement Claims for the period of July 23 through August 26, 2016. 4b. Adopt Resolution No. 16-106 Amending and Restating the Special Use Permit for 5100 Gamble Drive. 4c. Approve Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance No. 2498-16 amending Chapter 36 of the St. Louis Park Code of Ordinances relating to zoning to amend regulations pertaining to accessory buildings and signs, and to approve the ordinance summary for publication. 4d. Approve the Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance No. 2499-16 vacating drainage utility easements, and to approve the Ordinance Summary for Publication. 4e. Approve the Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance No. 2500-16 creating Section 26-268-PUD 7 of the Zoning Code and amending the Zoning Map from C-2 General Commercial to the Planned Unit Development (PUD) 7 for the property located at 4001 and 4025 Highway 7, and approve the Summary Ordinance for publication. 4f. Approve Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance No. 2501-16 creating Section 36- 268-PUD 6 of the Zoning Code and amending the Zoning Map from C-2 to PUD 6 for property located at 1601 Utica Avenue South and approve the Ordinance Summary for Publication. 4g. Approve Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance No. 2502-16 amending Section 36-268-PUD 3 relating to Arlington Row West Planned Unit Development, and to approve the summary ordinance for publication. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 3b) Page 3 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of September 6, 2016 4h. Approve Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance No. 2503-16 amending Section 36-268-PUD 5 relating to Arlington Row East Planned Unit Development, and approve ordinance summary for publication. 4i. Approve the second reading and Adopt Ordinance No. 2504-16 amending St. Louis Park City Code Chapter 3, Section 70 (g)(1) to Exempt Congressionally Chartered Veterans Organizations Holding a Club Liquor License from the 50% Food Ratio Requirement and to approve the summary ordinance for publication. 4j. Adopt Resolution No. 16-107 Authorizing the 2017 Preliminary HRA Levy. 4k. Adopt Resolution No. 16-108 approving a minor amendment to the Park Place Plaza Planned Unit Development to allow additions to the Costco building. 4l. Authorize staff to enter into an agreement with Cities Digital, Inc. to acquire the rights to use a records management software application. 4m. Adopt Resolution No. 16-109 to recognize Police Officer Terry Reuvers for his 30 years of service to the City of St. Louis Park. 4n. Adopt Resolution No. 16-110 authorizing the special assessment for the repair of the sewer service line at 3165 Texas Avenue South, St. Louis Park, MN. P.I.D. 17- 117-21-23-0002 4o. Approve for filing Planning Commission Minutes August 3, 2016. It was moved by Councilmember Brausen, seconded by Councilmember Lindberg, to approve the Agenda as presented and items listed on the Consent Calendar; and to waive reading of all resolutions and ordinances. The motion passed 5-0 (Mayor Spano and Councilmember Miller absent). 5. Boards and Commissions - None 6. Public Hearings 6a. First Reading of Ordinance Imposing a Franchise Fee on Northern States Power Co. (dba Xcel Energy) Ms. Heiser stated that this is the first reading of the franchise ordinance and franchise fee ordinance. She noted that the franchise ordinance is also referred to as the franchise agreement, and the agreement has a term of 20 years. She stated the city has imposed franchise fees on Xcel Energy since 2004, and keeping with council direction of reviewing the fees every other year, the fees were increased to $3.25/month for residential customers in 2015. Staff recommends approving the franchise fee ordinance, which will increase the fees to $4.00/month for a residential customer in 2017. Staff is also proposing to have the same increase for the franchise fee imposed on CenterPoint Energy. She added that the additional revenue from these fees funds the city’s capital improvement plan for city streets and various infrastructure improvements. Ms. Heiser stated staff recommends that council approve the first reading and set the second reading for Sept. 19, 2016. Based on this schedule, the franchise fee increase would be effective Feb. 1, 2017. Mayor Pro Tem Hallfin opened the public hearing. No speakers were present. Mayor Pro Tem Hallfin closed the public hearing. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 3b) Page 4 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of September 6, 2016 It was moved by Councilmember Mavity, seconded by Councilmember Brausen, to approve first reading of an ordinance imposing a franchise fee on Xcel Energy and set second reading for Sept. 19, 2016. The motion passed 5-0 (Mayor Spano and Councilmember Miller absent). 6b. First Reading of Ordinance Imposing a Franchise Fee on CenterPoint Energy Resource Corporation Ms. Heiser presented the staff report and reviewed the terms of the ordinance. Mayor Pro Tem Hallfin opened the public hearing. No speakers were present. Mayor Pro Tem Hallfin closed the public hearing. It was moved by Councilmember Sanger, seconded by Councilmember Lindberg, to approve first reading of an ordinance imposing a franchise fee on CenterPoint Energy Resources Corporation and set second reading for Sept. 19, 2016. The motion passed 5-0 (Mayor Spano and Councilmember Miller absent). 7. Requests, Petitions, and Communications from the Public – None 8. Resolutions, Ordinances, Motions and Discussion Items 8a. Floodplain District Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments Mr. Walther presented the report. He explained that the Federal Emergency Agency (FEMA) issued a Letter of Final Determination on May 4, 2016, notifying the city that revised FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps would become effective on November 4, 2016. Due to these changes, the city’s floodplain ordinance must be amended to comply with the new and updated federal regulations no later than November 4 in order for the community to remain eligible for the National Flood Insurance Program. Mr. Walther presented the zoning map that includes the overlay map of the floodplain for the areas affected. He explained that these changes must be done in a timely manner. Legal notifications were published in the Sun Sailor. He stated the 215 properties that intersected floodplain zoning district boundary changes were notified by U.S. mail. Mr. Walther added that there are also resources for residents on the city website to determine which category their properties may fall into, as well as a frequently asked questions and answers section, and an additional map where residents can search their own property. The new FEMA FIRM shows the 100-year and 500-year floodplain boundaries. Councilmember Brausen asked how the link is identified on the city’s website. Mr. Walther stated residents can go to the city website, type “flood” or “FEMA” in the search section, and the top article includes all of this information. Councilmember Sanger stated she realizes that because of FEMA and DNR requirements, the city does not have a choice on this. She asked Mr. Walther to explain if residents will need to do anything different now if their property is in a flood plain. Mr. Walther stated City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 3b) Page 5 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of September 6, 2016 that the law now puts the onus on mortgage companies to notify owners if their property is one that needs flood insurance. The mortgage company may send a letter to the home owner stating they need flood insurance. He further explained that if a resident does see they are in a floodplain on the materials provided on the city website, they do not need to wait for the letter from their mortgage company. They can go ahead and purchase flood insurance as soon as possible, and at least 30 days before the November 4 deadline, in order to potentially realize substantial savings on the cost of this insurance. Mr. Walther added that if only part of a resident’s lot and not the structure is in the floodplain, the resident can demonstrate to their Mortgage Company and FEMA that they do not need flood insurance. He added that the Planning Commission recommended approval of this ordinance and answered questions at the public hearing. Councilmember Mavity stated that informing residents about this topic over social media would also be a doing them a favor. It was moved by Councilmember Brausen, seconded by Councilmember Mavity, to approve first reading of an ordinance amending Chapter 36, Article IV, Division 10 of the St. Louis Park Code of Ordinances relating to Floodplain Districts and amending the Official Zoning Map. The motion passed 5-0 (Mayor Spano and Councilmember Miller absent). 8b. Rezoning – Office Building Located at 8001 Highway 7 Mr. Morrison presented the report. He explained that the applicant is the owner of the property and has applied to rezone the property to Office for the purpose of increasing the amount of signage the property is allowed. The property is currently zoned R-C High Density Multiple-Family Residence, and as such is allowed only 80 square feet of sign area. If the property is rezoned to Office, it would be allowed 200 square feet of sign area. The owner would like a free-standing sign out front near the frontage road and requests the sign be 60 square feet per side. Mr. Morrison stated the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and recommends approval. Councilmember Mavity asked about the type of communications with residents in the area and the South Oak Hill neighborhood. Mr. Morrison stated communications went to residents within 350 feet of the building. Councilmember Mavity asked if there are any homeowners within that radius. Mr. Morrison answered yes, and stated those properties to the east received notice from the city. Councilmember Mavity stated she will support this; however, she said it would be helpful to notify the South Oak Hill neighborhood and also make sure no one is surprised by this change. Councilmember Sanger asked why the city doesn’t grant a new sign variance rather than go through a rezoning, as it opens things up for a potential development that may be negative to neighbors. Mr. Morrison answered that staff did look at a variance, but decided to go with the rezoning because the property is currently guided office, and zoned High- City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 3b) Page 6 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of September 6, 2016 Density Multiple-Family Residence. Rezoning would make the property consistent with the comprehensive plan. Councilmember Lindberg stated he is uncomfortable with rezoning this property to allow signage, especially when it abuts a residential area. He added at this point he is not going to support the request, as he does not feel it is right, adding he would want to have more conversation with residents beforehand. He added he would also like the council to think more about the city’s signage standards. Councilmember Brausen asked the City Attorney how many votes are required to rezone this area. Mr. Mattick advised that four votes are required for approval. Councilmember Brausen asked if this area is rezoned Office, does the city have issues if it tries to substantiate this later if someone else fulfills all the requirements for a zoning change request, and then the council denies it. Mr. Mattick advised a zoning ordinance request is different than a CUP and variance. A CUP and variance are quasi-judicial actions, and an ordinance amendment is a legislative item. The council is afforded much more discretion in that decision. However, he added the comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance are supposed to be in agreement, so this may feel a bit awkward. The zoning ordinance should be reflective of the comprehensive plan. Councilmember Brausen noted accordingly he would be supporting this proposal. Mayor Pro Tem Hallfin asked if there are any rules on the signs themselves related to type, lighting and such. Mr. Morrison explained that with relation to height and display criteria, the rules for signage remain the same with the zoning ordinance amendment. It was moved by Councilmember Mavity, seconded by Councilmember Brausen, to approve first reading of an ordinance amending the Zoning Map to rezone the subject property from RC High-Density Multiple-Family to O Office, and set a second reading for Sept. 19, 2016. The motion passed 4-1 (Councilmember Lindberg opposed; Mayor Spano and Councilmember Miller absent). 9. Communications – None 10. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Steve Hallfin, Mayor Pro Tem Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: October 17, 2016 Minutes: 3c UNOFFICIAL MINUTES CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL STUDY SESSION ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA SEPTEMBER 19, 2016 The meeting convened at 6:30 p.m. Councilmembers present: Mayor Jake Spano, Tim Brausen, Steve Hallfin, Gregg Lindberg, Anne Mavity, Thom Miller, and Susan Sanger. Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), Engineering Director (Ms. Heiser), Senior Engineering Project Manager (Mr. Shamla), Transportation Engineer (Mr. Iverson), and Recording Secretary (Ms. Pappas). Guest: Dan Coyle, Kimley Horn 1. Texas Avenue Reconstruction Project Ms. Heiser introduced Mr. Shamla who gave an update on the project. Mr. Shamla stated that in 2017, Texas Avenue, between Highway 7 and Minnetonka Boulevard, is proposed to be reconstructed. This street is an important north/south route in the city and is designated as a Municipal State Aid (MSA) road which makes it eligible for state funding. In order to qualify for funding, the road needs to be constructed to state aid standards. The city engaged Kimley Horn to complete the study and design of Texas Avenue. Additionally, Mr. Shamla pointed out that CenterPoint Energy will be replacing their high pressure gas main on this segment of Texas Avenue in 2017. Staff recommends that the city pursue a reconstruction project, in conjunction with the CenterPoint Energy project, in order to achieve a cost savings as well as reduce inconvenience to the property owners and travelling public. Mr. Shamla added that the scope of the project includes street reconstruction; bike lanes; sidewalk reconstruction; streetlight replacement; signal rehabilitation/replacement; and miscellaneous utility rehabilitation. The schedule for this project begins with the preliminary layout completed by October 1, and final design presented in October. A third open house will be held for residents, and then construction will begin in April of 2017. The project will be completed by November, 2017. Mr. Shamla reviewed the feedback received from attendees at the first two open houses, regarding bikeway and parking concerns, along with concerns about backing in and out of their driveways. Councilmember Mavity asked what the anticipated growth on this road is for vehicles per day and if it will change over time. Mr. Shamla stated that the predicted growth is up to 9,011 vehicles per day by the year 2046. Councilmember Lindberg asked if the sanitary sewers and water mains are in good working order and if they will last through the duration of the project. Ms. Heiser replied that the utility division indicated that they are. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 3c) Page 2 Title: Special Study Session Minutes of September 19, 2016 Councilmember Sanger stated she is glad to see there are bike lanes included in the project. She added that the lanes look wider than they need to be and asked if there is any flexibility on this. Mr. Iverson stated the standard for bike lanes is 5 feet, and that is what is proposed here. Councilmember Sanger asked if the electronic speed sign would be permanent at this location. Ms. Heiser stated it will be permanent. Councilmember Sanger asked how the bus routes would be handled on Texas Avenue and if there would be enough room for the buses to turn onto the route. Mr. Shamla stated that the city would work with Metro Transit to coordinate. Councilmember Brausen asked how many bus routes are on Texas Avenue. Staff stated they would check into this and provide that information. Mayor Spano stated Texas Avenue is a state aid road, so the state has some control. He noted what had happened on Excelsior Boulevard with speed limits, after a speed study was conducted, and stated the speed may be increased here, also, if a speed study is conducted. Ms. Heiser recommended that traffic management be included in this project in order to influence vehicle speeds. This includes design elements such as making the street narrower through creating bump-ins. She added there is no stormwater design yet, as the concept will first need to be decided upon. Mr. Harmening added staff will need to understand what the council prefers for this project, and if there should be bike lanes, bump-outs, and speed/traffic calming. Councilmember Mavity noted that the South Oak Hill residents care about designs of bike lanes coming off the trail at Highway 7 and connecting to the crossing at Texas Avenue and Highway 7. She added that at the neighborhood meeting, residents noted they don’t like what is proposed. She asked staff to be sure this connection with bike lanes is seamless in this area. Staff presented the two concepts for Texas Avenue to the council. One concept has parking on one side of the street, while the other concept proposes parking on both sides of the street. Councilmember Hallfin asked with either concept, if any land is being taken away; if the sidewalk is widened; and if there are any issues with right-of-way. Staff noted that at this time there is no right-of-way acquisition for sidewalk construction. Councilmember Hallfin asked if there are any rules related to the boulevard and if they have to be grass, plantings, or cement. Ms. Heiser stated the majority of boulevards are grass, but the city will work with residents who prefer wood chips, or topsoil, or vegetation. However, most want sod on the boulevard. Councilmember Lindberg asked if there are any height limitations for vegetation. Ms. Heiser answered that the limit is 24 inches. Councilmember Mavity asked if there are efficiency issues in terms of traffic flow. Staff noted that bump-outs will likely slow traffic and with shorter distances for crosswalks, there are better pedestrian connections. Additionally, bike lanes can also slow traffic. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 3c) Page 3 Title: Special Study Session Minutes of September 19, 2016 Councilmember Mavity asked which concept plan staff recommends. Mr. Shamla stated staff recommends concept 2, with parking on both sides of the street. He added that they learned from resident feedback that the parking lanes assist residents who back out of their driveways. Councilmember Sanger stated she supports bike lanes and is in favor of concept 2 because of this. Councilmember Lindberg noted staff summarized this project well and stated his job as councilmember is to be a champion for Ward 3 and solicit comments from residents about this project. He stated he has spoken to a number of people; however, there is no one who says that bikeways are appropriate on Texas Avenue. He noted residents have support for bike lanes in general, but not on Texas Avenue. So at this point, he does not support concept 1 or 2, and has to follow the lead of the residents in his ward. Councilmember Lindberg added that many are concerned about how close the infrastructure comes to their homes. They are also concerned about the addition of bikes on an already busy street. He stated he has to be responsible for what residents are saying and try to balance that with what he is hearing from the folks who live on Texas Avenue. Councilmember Brausen stated he respects and accepts this but also believes that the city has to continue to build out a multi-use transportation system. It seems clear that the street can handle it based on traffic flow. He added he supports concept 2, noting it seems like there is adequate parking, while he is also sensitive to those losing some near their driveway. Councilmember Mavity stated it is important to add bike lanes, although she understands the comments from residents in Ward 3. She noted this is important as it follows what is being done across the city. She stated this project may feel more dramatic; however, the city will try to work with residents to address concerns. She stated she is supportive and wants to continue conversations about the intersection at Highway 7. Councilmember Miller stated he generally supports bike lanes through the city but he does question if Texas Avenue is the best place to put bike lanes. He stated when he bikes, he uses a trail and does not use Texas Avenue, adding that at the last meeting related to the Texas Avenue project, no one attended from the Bike and Walk the Park group, which seems to mean that bike lanes are not a priority on Texas Avenue, and it is not as important a thoroughfare for biking. He noted he would totally support bike lanes on Louisiana and Dakota Avenues, but added he doesn’t really understand the need for it on Texas Avenue and will not support the project. Councilmember Sanger stated she has biked Texas Avenue going to Knollwood Mall, adding that there will need to be traffic lights in this vicinity. Ms. Heiser noted the traffic light on 33rd will remain. Councilmember Hallfin stated he believes concept 2 would be fine, but noted in conversations with Councilmember Lindberg and residents of Ward 3, there may be some options the council has not thought through as yet. Mayor Spano stated that he prefers concept 2 and agrees with keeping parking on both sides of the street. However, he is not hearing a consensus, although most councilmembers are leaning towards concept 2. He added there are still questions; however, the city has made a commitment to increase bike and pedestrian access. Because there are not that many north-south connections in the city, it is challenging. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 3c) Page 4 Title: Special Study Session Minutes of September 19, 2016 Councilmember Lindberg stated in hearing the general direction of council, he will have more questions and need more answers for residents. He asked staff what the bike counts are on Texas Avenue today and what the city expects them to be in the future. Ms. Heiser stated staff will provide this information at a future discussion. Staff was also asked for a tree count; how the project may impact homeowners’ trees; and impact information for residents where there will be planned bump-outs. Additionally, it was noted that council should direct any other questions on the project to Ms. Heiser. Mr. Shamla added if bike lanes are not added to Texas Avenue now and are done later, it will be very costly. The meeting adjourned at 7:25 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Jake Spano, Mayor Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: October 17, 2016 Minutes: 3d UNOFFICIAL MINUTES CITY COUNCIL MEETING ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA SEPTEMBER 19, 2016 1. Call to Order Mayor Spano called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. Councilmembers present: Mayor Jake Spano, Tim Brausen, Steve Hallfin, Gregg Lindberg, Anne Mavity, Thom Miller, and Susan Sanger. Councilmembers absent: None. Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), City Attorney (Mr. Mattick), Deputy City Manager/Human Resources Director (Ms. Deno), Controller (Mr. Simon), City Clerk (Ms. Kennedy), Transportation Director (Mr. Iverson), and Recording Secretary (Ms. Pappas). Guests: St. Louis Park residents with shovels, and Evergreen Award winners. 1a. Pledge of Allegiance 1b. Roll Call 2. Presentations 2a. 2016 Evergreen Awards It was noted that since 1990, this award has been given to property owners in St. Louis Park who beautify their yards with uniquely designed and well-maintained landscapes, visible to passersby. This year’s winners are: Jeanette Upton Porter – 44th Street Liesl Kautz – Cedar Manor Neighborhood Patricia and Maurice Young – Louisiana Avenue Mayor Spano thanked all the winners and congratulated them on their achievements. Councilmember Brausen added these award-winning yards have been an inspiration to him and his wife, who have spent the last 15 years planting in their yard and encouraging residents to do the same. He noted this practice will ultimately help address global warming issues. 2b. Recognition of Donation It was noted that Nyra Rustad has donated $2,200 for a park bench at Wolfe Park. Mayor Spano thanked her on behalf of the council and the city. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 3d) Page 2 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of September 19, 2016 3. Approval of Minutes 3a. City Council Study Session Minutes August 22, 2016 It was moved by Councilmember Hallfin, seconded by Councilmember Brausen, to approve the August 22, 2016 Study Session Meeting Minutes as presented. The motion passed 7-0. 4. Approval of Agenda and Items on Consent Calendar 4a. Approve Temporary On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for the Job’s Daughters Foundation of Minnesota for an event to be held on October 22, 2016, at the Paul Revere Masonic Center, 6509 Walker Street. 4b. Approve the Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance No. 2505-16, Granting a franchise to Northern States Power Company, dba Xcel Energy and Approve the Ordinance Summary for publication, and Adopt Ordinance No. 2506-16, Imposing a franchise fee on Xcel Energy and Approve the Ordinance Summary for publication. 4c. Approve the Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance No. 2507-16, Granting a franchise to CenterPoint Energy Resources Corporation and Approve the Ordinance Summary for publication, and Adopt Ordinance No. 2508-16, Imposing a franchise fee on CenterPoint Energy, and Approve the Ordinance Summary for publication. 4d. Approve the Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance No. 2509-16, Amending Chapter 36, Article IV, Division 10 of the St. Louis Park Code of Ordinances relating to Floodplain Districts and amending the Official Zoning Map and approve the Ordinance Summary for publication 4e. Adopt Resolution No. 16-111, Appointing additional Election Judges needed to staff the polls at the General Election November 8, 2016. 4f. Adopt Resolution No. 16-112, Committing to transferring city property and easements to the Metropolitan Council for the SWLRT Project and Approve Three Subordinate Funding Agreements for LRCI design costs. 4g. Approve Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance No. 2510-16, Amending the City of St. Louis Park Zoning Map to rezone property located at 8001 State Highway 7 from RC High-Density Multiple-Family Residence to O Office, and to approve the Summary Ordinance for publication. 4h. Adopt Resolution No. 16-113, Approving acceptance of a $2,200 donation from Nyra Rustad for the purchase and installation of a bench in Wolfe Park. It was moved by Councilmember Hallfin seconded by Councilmember Mavity, to approve the Agenda and items listed on the Consent Calendar and to waive reading of all resolutions and ordinances. The motion passed 7-0. 5. Boards and Commissions - None 6. Public Hearings City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 3d) Page 3 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of September 19, 2016 6a. Punch Bowl Minneapolis, LLC, dba Punch Bowl Social – On-Sale Intoxicating and On-Sale Sunday Liquor License Ms. Kennedy presented the staff report. She stated the city received an application from the applicant for an On-Sale Intoxicating and On-Sale Sunday liquor license for the property located at 1621 West End Boulevard, Suite 2410. She stated Punch Bowl Social is a dining and entertainment destination. It is a franchise business, with 12 locations nationwide, and the St. Louis Park location will be the first in Minnesota. It has indoor seating for 270 guests and outdoor seating for 80 guests. The applicant intends to open for business in November, 2016. She stated the Police Department completed the background investigation on the principals of the application and found no reason to deny the license application. Mayor Spano opened the public hearing. Katherine Becker, 80 S. 8th St., Minneapolis, stated she is the local attorney working on this project. She answered questions from the council. She noted that the company is based out of Colorado and has a southern inspired menu. She added that they plan to be open for brunch on the weekends and for lunch and dinner Monday through Friday. Councilmember Brausen asked where it will be located in the West End. Ms. Becker stated at Gamble and Park Place. Councilmember Miller asked if the liquor license will be valid through March of 2017, and if they will then be required to renew. Ms. Kennedy stated that is correct. Councilmember Sanger asked if there were limits in place for what percentage of the West End can be devoted to places with liquor and how close the city will now be to the cap. Mr. Harmening responded if Toby Keith’s was still open, this venue would bring the development very close to the limit. Mayor Spano closed the public hearing. Councilmember Mavity asked if these limits extend to the new construction located at the West End. Mr. Harmening answered they do not, adding that the reason there are limits is because of the parking demand. Other uses are being handled separately because they have their own dedicated parking. It was moved by Councilmember Brausen, seconded by Councilmember Mavity, to approve application from Punch Bowl Minneapolis, LLC dba Punch Bowl Social, for an On-Sale Intoxicating and On-Sale Sunday Liquor License for the premises located at 1621 West End Boulevard - Suite 2410, with a license term through March 1, 2017. The motion passed 7-0. 6b. Madilin Creative, LLC, dba Board & Brush St. Louis Park On-Sale Wine and 3.2% Malt Liquor License Ms. Kennedy presented the staff report. She noted the applicant is requesting an On-Sale Wine and On-Sale 3.2% malt liquor license for the property at 5810 36th Street West. Board City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 3d) Page 4 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of September 19, 2016 and Brush is a design studio that allows patrons to make their own decorative pieces. It is a franchised business with 28 locations nationwide, and the premises will consist of an art studio and food service area. Andrew and Jennifer Fleury are the sole owners and managers of the business and intend to open for business as soon as possible. Ms. Kennedy added the Police department completed the background check, and no issues were found that would warrant denial of the license. Mayor Spano opened the public hearing. No speakers were present. Mayor Spano closed the public hearing. Councilmember Mavity asked if there were any potential impacts to the proposed use given the location’s proximity to the proposed light rail station. Mr. Harmening stated that given the limited scale of this limited use license, he did not see any potential impact in the area mentioned. It was moved by Councilmember Mavity, seconded by Councilmember Brausen, to approve application from Madilin Creative, LLC, dba Board & Brush St. Louis Park, for an On-Sale Wine and 3.2% Malt Liquor License for the premises located at 5810 West 36th Street, with a license term through March 1, 2017. The motion passed 7-0. 7. Requests, Petitions, and Communications from the Public – None 8. Resolutions, Ordinances, Motions and Discussion Items 8a. Adopt 2017 Preliminary Property Tax Levy Certification and Preliminary General Fund Budget. Resolution No. 16-114 Mr. Simon presented the staff report. He reviewed the information related to the 2017 Preliminary Budget and 2017 Preliminary Property Tax Levy. An additional budget presentation will be made to the public on December 5, and the final budget approval will be December 19, 2016. Mr. Simon explained the overall tax levy is 6.5% over last year, with the majority being in the general fund. He noted that a grant was received by the city for two full-time positions in the Fire Department. Additionally, he pointed out that because the city provides various services, the majority of the budget reflects personnel expenditures. Mayor Spano explained that once the preliminary levy is set this evening, it can be decreased; however, it cannot be increased. Councilmember Lindberg asked where residents may find information on the city’s website about the proposed levy and budget. Mr. Simon stated residents can go to the Finance Department page, link to budget information, and all the detail is located there. He noted a video would also be added soon. Councilmember Lindberg stated the website is easy to get to and includes good information for residents. Councilmember Sanger stated she will support the preliminary tax levy; however, she wanted to note there is an issue that is not reflected in the 2017 budget, and there are a City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 3d) Page 5 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of September 19, 2016 number of residents in the audience currently who would like to address this budget-related topic this evening. She continued, currently the city plows roughly half of the sidewalk miles in town. While this is not a public hearing, this is a budget-related issue, and there is a group here tonight who are hoping to address the council at this time. Mr. Dale Anderson, 2700 Vernon Avenue South, stated that clearing sidewalks in St. Louis Park is a complicated situation. Because the city provides its residents with different levels of service, it creates an unequal burden. He stated that it seems the city prefers to support street clearing for motorists more than sidewalk clearing for pedestrians, and the council seems to be okay with these unequal obligations. Additionally, he pointed out there are severe fines for not shoveling sidewalks within the six-hour timeframe, and some are double taxed for cleaning sidewalks which abut their property. He also noted this is unequal treatment that disconnects residents. He believes it is the city’s responsibility to fund the clearing of snow from sidewalks. Mr. Anderson added that the city has recommended getting a volunteer to shovel; however, this is not easy to do, nor is it always timely to find someone – either volunteer, or hired snow service – to do this within the required timeframe. He noted that this situation makes St. Louis Park a nice place to visit, but people would not want to own property here. Mr. Anderson suggested that one solution is for the city to fund the clearing of everyone’s sidewalks, but he realizes this will cost money. He stated that if the city can find volunteers to do this job in a timely manner, he will wait for it to be tested. He also recommended dropping the fines. Mr. Jerry Engber, 4209 Basswood Road, stated his home was the first on Basswood Road, and he has lived there for 34 years. He added there is no public property adjacent to his house, and he lived at this address before sidewalks were added. He stated he is new to this process and was unaware of the unequal treatment mentioned by Mr. Anderson. Mr. Engber stated that hearing about this situation is disconcerting, and he believes the city needs to find funds to pay for shoveling public sidewalks. Ms. Cheryl Martin, 5826 26th Street West, stated she has been a realtor for 37 years, lived in her house for 34 years, and raised 2 children as a single mom. There has been no sidewalk in front of her house in all the years she has lived there. Ms. Martin stated she has wanted a sidewalk; however, after hearing about this situation, she does not want a sidewalk. She believes the city is pushing people from their homes for not shoveling their sidewalks. She stated that this, along with the lack of affordable housing in St. Louis Park, is going to make it difficult for seniors to remain in their homes. She added that seniors won’t have enough in their budget to pay for this service, and she would hate to see seniors leave the city because of this policy. St. Louis Park wants to be a diversified community. From a real estate standpoint, this is a great place to live. Ms. Martin stated there is a 1.8 months’ supply of houses for sale in St. Louis Park at this time and the normal amount is 5 months, which indicates the desirability of the city. Councilmember Brausen stated he appreciated the residents coming to the meeting to discuss this, adding this is a budget issue that will continue to be addressed. He stated it was addressed at a study session recently, also. He explained there are difficult challenges from a revenue point of view, as the estimated cost of clearing the snow from sidewalks at City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 3d) Page 6 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of September 19, 2016 the standard the city prefers is substantial and approaches $1 million. He stated that there are trade-offs to make with the budget, and the council will continue to talk about this. He stated the council respects the resident’s opinions and thanked the residents for sharing them. Councilmember Lindberg also thanked everyone for their comments and stated that the council will look at all options. He asked staff how many fines have been issued on sidewalk maintenance. Mr. Harmening stated he and Mr. Anderson had talked about this issue over the years, noting tickets had not been given out on a regular basis. Mr. Harmening stated that he will pull together information for the council from the past three years related to warnings or tickets issued, and fines, adding it is a relatively nominal number. Councilmember Sanger thanked residents who came to the meeting and spoke to this issue. She noted that Mr. Anderson’s calculation on the fines is the theoretical maximum that could be imposed if someone repeatedly does not shovel the city sidewalk in front of their home. She stated that the city has not imposed the fines to the theoretical maximum, but what she understands from the residents, it is the fear of getting the fine that is a problem, whether or not they actually get the fine. Councilmember Sanger added that it will cost the city $150,000-$500,000 per year to shovel the sidewalks where it is not currently done. However, it is a question of fairness, and the city needs to treat everyone equally. She added that everyone is taxed, but the city needs to provide services on an equal basis. Councilmember Sanger said the council talks over and over again about walkability in this community, and if the city wants people to walk safely, it needs to make sure that all the sidewalks are clear. For those sidewalks that are not cleared, people are walking in the streets, which creates a potential safety issue. She stated the council needs to keep looking at this issue. While she knows it is not an easy issue, it is not going away, and it needs to be addressed. Councilmember Mavity stated we are throwing out a lot of really dramatic numbers, and she wanted to caution everyone as they are hearing these costs for shoveling sidewalks. She had thought it was more in the million-dollar range, looks forward to further discussion on this, and appreciates folks coming forward to talk about it. Councilmember Mavity noted with regard to the levy amount, as the motion proceeds today, the Council is authorizing the levy at the maximum amount. She added that in her seven years on the council, this number has always gone down, but the Council wants to leave flexibility for staff on this so that the work to be done is accurate. Additionally, she recently spent the day with city council peers from other cities around the state talking about long-range planning to address older infrastructures. They are not taking the long- range view like St. Louis Park is. She noted that St. Louis Park is trying to be mindful and plan accordingly in advance of a crisis situation, and thanked staff for doing that. Mayor Spano stated that the city has heard from bond rating agencies and auditors that our practices have allowed the city to be in a good position. He added this is a hallmark of St. Louis Park’s management that will continue. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 3d) Page 7 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of September 19, 2016 Councilmember Miller agreed with Councilmember Sanger on this issue and stated he would like to take it up again. He added he thinks the amount is relatively small and agrees this should be part of the public infrastructure and taken under consideration. He added that the largest part of the budget is not these projects but is the personnel who take care of city services. Councilmember Brausen added he thinks this is a very fair and judicious budget. Councilmember Lindberg added that 77% of the budget is the investment in staff, adding there are certain high expectations, and this is council’s investment in the people who do the work. He strongly supports these folks, and training and motivating staff to do their jobs well. He added he appreciates the work staff does and is in support of this in the budget. Mayor Spano stated the sidewalk shoveling/plowing discussion takes place every couple of years, and at the study session a couple of months ago, the city manager noted the costs for hiring staff and equipment for this project. Mr. Harmening stated it would cost $1.1 million to shovel all city sidewalks and an annual cost of $400,000 for staff. He agreed that the city’s most important asset is the people who support city services. It was moved by Councilmember Brausen, seconded by Councilmember Hallfin, to adopt Resolution No. 16-114, Approving 2017 Preliminary General Fund Budget, 2017 Preliminary Property Tax Levy, and Setting Budget Public Hearing date for December 5, 2016. The motion passed 7-0. 8b. Traffic Study No. 669: Installation of Permit Parking – 1300 Block of Kentucky Avenue. Resolution No. 16-115 Mr. Iverson presented the staff report. He explained that the city has a program for authorizing permit parking for areas where parking demand is high. The area in question is near the 394 and Louisiana Avenue intersection. The Engineering Department has received a petition from residents on the 1300 block of Kentucky Avenue to install permit parking on their block. Residents have noted a large increase of parking demand on their block since the construction of the Comfort First facility at 7115 Wayzata Boulevard. This situation was discussed at the June Traffic Committee meeting, and since then, staff from Engineering and Community Development have met with a Comfort First representative and held a public meeting for potentially impacted residents to discuss the situation. Councilmember Sanger stated she remembered when approvals were granted for construction of the Comfort First facility, and parking was discussed at that time. She noted underground parking was available to support their employees and visitors at that time, so why is the council considering this now. Mr. Iverson explained that people are being advised to park on the street now, as underground parking spots are secured and have been held for employees. Councilmember Brausen stated he has looked at this parking situation and spoken with management at Comfort First. He noted one reason they would like to reserve parking is City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 3d) Page 8 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of September 19, 2016 for their staff that does visits at the facility. He added there is more space on Kentucky Avenue. He stated he does support permit parking there, and the neighborhood supports it, as well. Mayor Spano noted he lives near Methodist Hospital, and permit parking has been installed on the street there, also, and there have not been any problems with it at all. He added it has worked in his neighborhood, and Methodist Hospital supported it. In light of this, it is important that Comfort First also receives permits. He added he supports it, also. Councilmember Hallfin asked if someone parks there without a permit, how will the city handle this and what is the process. Mr. Iverson answered it would be complaint driven, and a parking ticket would be issued. Councilmember Mavity added this has been a good use of parking in Ward 2, and she very much supports this, as well. It was moved by Councilmember Brausen, seconded by Councilmember Lindberg, to adopt Resolution No. 16-115, authorizing the implementation of permit parking restrictions on the 1300 block of Kentucky Avenue South. The motion passed 7-0. 9. Communications Councilmember Lindberg reported on the Two Wheels on 28th event and conversations on bike lanes. He stated he was very impressed with the event and heard there were 130 surveys completed. He added it was a very impressive crowd. He thanked staff for their work on this and for the encouraging dialogue. Mayor Spano stated that on Sunday, he held a coffee open house, and it was a great opportunity to talk to folks about city issues. He said he had a police officer join him and will do this again, as it was a great opportunity to ask the officer questions, also. He stated he will circulate the date for next month. Mr. Harmening stated this coming Saturday will be the annual fall clean-up day at the municipal service center from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. He noted if residents check the website, they can see what items are accepted at no charge and which items are accepted for a fee. 10. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 8:45 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Jake Spano, Mayor Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: October 17, 2016 Consent Agenda Item: 4a EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Shared Services Agreements with City of Golden Valley for Central Park West RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Authorize the City Manager to execute a Shared Services Agreement with the City of Golden Valley relating to the Central Park West redevelopment. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does City Council support entering into a shared service agreement with the City of Golden Valley for permitting, plan review, and inspections for the “10 West End” building in the Central Park West redevelopment? SUMMARY: The Central Park West development is located southwest of the intersection of I- 394 and Highway 100 and straddles the municipal border of Golden Valley and St. Louis Park. Three of the structures in the development will partially lie in both cities. This results in administrative complications for providing municipal services. The Golden Valley and St. Louis Park city staffs have been working to identify, prepare for, and resolve these issues. In August 2015, St. Louis Park and Golden Valley entered into a shared services agreement for the 199-unit apartment building (“Residential Building”) and the future office parking ramp(s) (“Parking Ramp”). That agreement covers permitting, plan review, and inspections and so far it is working well for both cities. In September 2016, the “10 West End” office final plan was approved by both cities. That plan includes a covered loading dock and skyway connection between the office building and Parking Ramp that also lies in both cities. A new shared services agreement was prepared to handle the office/skyway/loading dock. Under the agreement, St. Louis Park will review and issue permits and conduct inspections on these items, both cities will keep records, and St. Louis Park will share a percentage of the fees collected with Golden Valley. This agreement is designed to be ongoing, unless and until one of the cities chooses to terminate the agreement. This shared services agreement excludes emergency services in the scope, except to note that none of the provisions of the agreement conflict or alter existing mutual aid agreements. Golden Valley City Council similarly authorized the agreement on October 5, 2016. A report summarizing this agreement was included in the City Councils October 10 study session packet. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The agreement includes sharing a modest portion of the permit and plan review revenue with Golden Valley to cover some of Golden Valley’s administrative recordkeeping costs. Staff estimated $650 would be shared with Golden valley for the initial office building construction. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Shared Services Agreement Prepared by: Sean Walther, Planning and Zoning Supervisor Reviewed by: Michele Schnitker, Deputy Community Development Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager SHARED SERVICES AGREEMENT (Central Park West – Office/Skyway/Loading Dock) This Shared Services Agreement (this “Agreement”) is made this ___ day of ____________, 2016, by and between the CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK, a Minnesota municipal corporation, (“St. Louis Park”) and the CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY, a Minnesota municipal corporation, (“Golden Valley”). RECITALS A. Minn. Stat. § 471.59 et seq. authorizes cities to enter into agreements to share services. B. St. Louis Park and Golden Valley each approved a planned unit development, as amended from time to time (collectively, the “PUDs”) with respect the real property legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto (the “Office & Ramp Parcel”). C. The Office & Ramp Parcel is partly within the jurisdiction of St. Louis Park and partly within the jurisdiction of Golden Valley. D. The owner of the Office & Ramp Parcel (the “Owner”) intends to construct an office tower (the “Office Tower”) and multi-level parking structure (the “Parking Ramp”) and related improvements on the Office & Ramp Parcel, in accordance with the PUDs. E. As approved in the PUDs, the portion of the Office & Ramp Parcel on which the Office Tower will be located is entirely within the jurisdiction of St. Louis Park. F. As approved in the PUDs, the portion of the Office & Ramp Parcel on which the Parking Ramp will be located is partly within the jurisdiction of St. Louis Park and partly within the jurisdiction of Golden Valley. G. The parties entered into a Share Services Agreement dated August 19, 2015 (“Existing Shared Services Agreement”), regarding, among other things, the inspection and permitting of construction, maintenance and other certain regulated activities with respect to Parking Ramp. H. Subsequent to the Existing Shared Services Agreement, the PUDs were amended to allow the Owner to construct a loading dock area and skyway facility located between and connecting the Office Tower and the Parking Ramp as shown in the amended plans for the PUDs (collectively, the “Additional Facilities”), with such Additional Facilities located in the area labelled as the “Loading Dock” on the site plan attached as Exhibit B hereto. I. As contemplated in the PUDs, a portion of the Additional Facilities will be located within the jurisdiction of St. Louis Park (the “SLP Part of the Additional Facilities”) and the remaining portion will be located within the jurisdiction of Golden Valley (the “GV Part of the Additional Facilities”). J. The final plans for the Additional Facilities remain subject to the review and approval of St. Louis Park and Golden Valley, in accordance with their respective city codes. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Title: Shared Services Agreements with City of Golden Valley for Central Park West Page 2 2 K. The site plan attached as Exhibit B attached hereto shows the Office & Ramp Parcel, the expected location of the Office Tower, the Parking Ramp and Additional Facilities, and the jurisdictional boundary line between St. Louis Park and Golden Valley. L. St. Louis Park and Golden Valley have the common power to administer and enforce state-wide codes applicable to the construction, demolition, replacement, repair, installation, or maintenance of buildings, structures and related improvements, including without limitation the Minnesota State Building Code and the Minnesota State Fire Code (collectively, the “State Codes”). M. The fee schedules under the parties’ respective city codes impose or require substantially similar fee and charge amounts in connection with the administration and enforcement of the State Codes. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Agreement is to increase the efficiency of the parties’ inspection and permitting of construction, maintenance and other certain regulated activities that Owner will engage in with respect to the Additional Facilities. 2. Additional Facilities. A. Administration and Enforcement of State Codes. (i) With respect to the SLP Part of the Additional Facilities, St. Louis Park shall exercise its powers to administer and enforce the State Codes applicable to the construction and maintenance of the Additional Facilities. (ii) With respect to the GV Part of the Additional Facilities, St. Louis Park shall exercise on behalf of Golden Valley their common powers to administer and enforce the State Codes to the same kind and extent St. Louis Park applies such codes to the SLP Part of the Additional Facilities. (iii) Pursuant to the foregoing, permit(s) and certificate(s) of occupancy that apply to or include the Additional Facilities shall be issued by St. Louis Park, and St. Louis Park shall be responsible for all inspections and enforcement activities related to the State Codes applicable to the Additional Facilities. It being the intent of the parties that the Owner need only coordinate with St. Louis Park for such permits and certificates of occupancy for the Additional Facilities. (iv) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, Golden Valley shall have (a) the right to perform a final walk-through inspection of the Additional Facilities prior to the issuance of any certificate of occupancy therefor; and (b) full access to (and copies of, if requested) all records related to St. Louis Park’s administration and enforcement of the State Codes with respect to the Additional Facilities, including, to the extent applicable, electronic access to such records. B. Fees. Any fees, charges or surcharges (including without limitation building permit fees, building plan review fees, electrical permit fees, mechanical permit City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Title: Shared Services Agreements with City of Golden Valley for Central Park West Page 3 3 fees, plumbing permit fees, and fire permit fees) imposed or required under the parties’ respective city codes with respect to the administration and enforcement of the State Codes for the development and maintenance of the Additional Facilities and the Office Tower (collectively, “Fees”) shall be imposed, collected and allocated as follows: (i) To the extent the St. Louis Park City Code imposes or requires Fees, St. Louis Park shall impose or require therewith Fees for the entire Additional Facilities (i.e., both the SLP Part of the Additional Facilities and the GV Part of the Additional Facilities) in accordance with the fee schedule of the St. Louis Park City Code, and such fees shall be collected by St. Louis Park. (ii) Any Fees collected by St. Louis Park shall be allocated among the parties as follows: a. All collected Fees shall belong to St. Louis Park, except GV’s Share which shall belong to Golden Valley. b. As used herein the term “GV’s Share” shall mean the product of the following formula to the extent such product exceeds $500.00: The amount of Fees received by St. Louis Park, multiplied by 0.7%, multiplied by 25%. c. St. Louis Park shall be responsible for calculating GV’s Share and shall do so for each Business Day it receives one or more payments of Fees. St. Louis Park’s determination of GV’s Share shall be subject to Golden Valley review and approval. For purposes of applying the foregoing formula, the “amount of Fees received by St. Louis Park” shall be determined separately for each Business Day on which Fees are received by St. Louis Park. It being the intent of the parties to avoid the administrative cost of processing the payment of GV’s Share with respect to relatively small amounts of Fees received by St. Louis Park; provided that whether Golden Valley is entitled to any share of Fees shall not impair Golden Valley’s rights under Section 2.A(iv) above. As used herein the term, “Business Day” shall mean any day Monday through Friday on which the governmental offices of the parties are open for normal business. d. Pursuant to the foregoing, if GV’s Share is less than $500.00 on any Business Day, no payment of Fees collected on that Business Day shall be made to Golden Valley. e. If pursuant to the foregoing Golden Valley is to receive any Fees, St. Louis Park shall pay such amount to Golden Valley within thirty (30) days of its receipt of such Fees and shall provide to Golden Valley with such payment documentation evidencing the total amount of Fees received by St. Louis Park on the applicable Business Day and the calculation of GV’s Share with respect to such fees received. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Title: Shared Services Agreements with City of Golden Valley for Central Park West Page 4 4 f. The foregoing 0.7% figure represents the percentage of the Additional Facility and Office Tower Floor Area that will lie within Golden Valley’s jurisdiction, according to the plans approved in the PUDs. As used herein, the term “Additional Facility and Office Tower Floor Area” refers to the total combined gross floor area of the Additional Facilities and the Office Tower, according to the PUDs. (iii) To the extent St. Louis Park’s imposition or requirement of any Fees is based on a valuation of the Office Tower and Additional Facilities set forth in a permit application, prior to approving such application, St. Louis Park shall provide Golden Valley a copy of the application and any documentation it obtains or receives in connection with such valuation. Within ten (10) Business Days of its receipt of the application and such documentation, Golden Valley shall indicate to St. Louis Park whether it agrees or disagrees with the valuation, and if it disagrees the basis for such disagreement. In the event Golden Valley disagrees with the valuation, the parties shall cooperate with the property owner to agree upon an acceptable valuation prior to proceeding with the application. (iv) To the extent a party performs an inspection of the Additional Facilities pursuant to its city code or this Agreement and under that party’s city code a separate fee is imposed for such inspection, the foregoing shall not prevent such party from charging, collecting and retaining such inspection fee in its entirety. (v) Except as provided herein, Golden Valley shall not impose or require the payment of any Fees. 3. Mutual Aid for Public Safety. This Agreement shall not modify or amend any other agreements between the parties, or to which the parties are a party, regarding fire, police and other emergency services. 4. Workers Compensation Claims. It is agreed that any and all employees of St. Louis Park and Golden Valley and all other persons engaged by each respective party in the performance of any work or services required or provided as contemplated by this Agreement shall not be considered employees of the other party, and that any and all claims that may or might arise under worker’s compensation laws or unemployment compensation laws on behalf of said employees while so engaged and any and all claims made by any third parties as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said employees while so engaged on any of the work or services provided as contemplated by this Agreement shall in no way be the obligation or responsibility of the other party. 5. Retained Authority. Except to the extent expressly provided herein, this Agreement shall not otherwise alter the municipal powers of the parties. 6. Term. This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon six (6) months advance written notice to the other party. 7. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended at any time by agreement of the parties. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Title: Shared Services Agreements with City of Golden Valley for Central Park West Page 5 5 8. Saving Provision. If any provision of this Agreement shall be found invalid or unenforceable with respect to any entity or in any jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby, and such provisions found to be unlawful or unenforceable shall not be affected as to their enforcement or lawfulness as to any other entity or in any other jurisdiction, and to such extent the terms and provisions of this Agreement are intended to be severable 9. Notices. Any written notice required hereunder shall be hand delivered or by certified mail at the following addresses unless the other party is given notice of a change of address by certified mail: City of St. Louis Park Attention: City Clerk 5005 Minnetonka Boulevard St. Louis Park, MN 55416 City of Golden Valley Attention: City Clerk 7800 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley, MN 55427 (The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.) City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Title: Shared Services Agreements with City of Golden Valley for Central Park West Page 6 Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: October 17, 2016 Consent Agenda Item: 4b EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Statutory Tort Limits for Liability Insurance RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution electing not to waive the statutory tort limits for liability insurance. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the Council agree with Staff’s recommendation to continue the past decision not to waive the statutory tort limits for liability insurance? SUMMARY: Each year the Council is required to pass a resolution indicating if they wish to waive or not waive the monetary limits on municipal tort liability insurance established by Minnesota Statute 466.04. The statutory liability limits for claims that occur after July 1, 2009 are $500,000 per claimant and $1,500,000 per occurrence. The City Council must review and make an election of one of the following three options: Not to waive the statutory tort limits (Staff recommendation) Waive the limits and not purchase excess liability coverage. Waive the limits and purchase excess liability coverage The three options are explained in more detail in the background section of this report. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The City will continue to maintain liability insurance coverage through the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust in the amount required by State Statute, and the required annual motion will be in place in preparation for the new policy year. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion Resolution Prepared by: Coty Hemann, Accountant Reviewed by: Tim Simon, Chief Financial Officer Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4b) Page 2 Title: Statutory Tort Limits for Liability Insurance DISCUSSION BACKGROUND: The three options the City Council has are detailed below. The City’s practice has been option 1, to not waive the statutory tort limits. Staff recommends the Council continue with this practice. Option 1 (Current) If the city elects not to waive the statutory tort limits, an individual claimant would be able to recover no more than $500,000 on any claim to which the statutory tort limits apply. The total which all claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence would be limited to $1,500,000. Option 2 If the city waives the statutory tort limits and does not purchase excess liability coverage, a single claimant could potentially recover up to $1,500,000 on a single occurrence. The total which all claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would also be limited to $1,500,000, regardless of the number of claimants. Option 3 If the city waives the statutory tort limits and purchases excess liability coverage, a single claimant could potentially recover an amount up to the limit of the coverage purchased. The total which all claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would also be limited to the amount of coverage purchased, regardless of the number of claimants. The City of St. Louis Park in the past has elected to not waive the statutory tort limits and has not purchased excess liability coverage. Staff recommends continuing this practice and not to waive the statutory limits. The following resolution allows the statutory tort limits to remain in place until the Council changes this election. Staff will ask Council to consider this question annually as required by the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4b) Page 3 Title: Statutory Tort Limits for Liability Insurance RESOLUTION NO. 16-____ RESOLUTION ELECTING NOT TO WAIVE THE STATUTORY TORT LIMITS FOR LIABILITY INSURANCE WHEREAS, pursuant to previous action taken, the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust has requested the City to make an election with regard to waiving or not waiving its tort liability established by Minnesota Statute 466.04; and WHEREAS, the choices available are to not waive the statutory limit, to waive the limit but to keep insurance coverage at the statutory limit, or to waive the limit and to add additional insurance coverage; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the St. Louis Park City Council does hereby elect not to waive the statutory tort liability limit established by Minnesota Statute 466.04 and that such election is effective until amended by further resolution of the St. Louis Park City Council. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council October 17, 2016 City Manager Mayor Attest: City Clerk Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: October 17, 2016 Consent Agenda Item: 4c EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Accept Donation from International Society of Arboriculture RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution approving acceptance of a monetary donation from the International Society of Arboriculture in an amount not to exceed $2,000 for all related expenses for Jim Vaughan, Natural Resources Coordinator, to attend the 2016 International Society of Arboriculture Leadership Workshop in Champaign, Illinois. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish to accept the gift with restrictions on its use? SUMMARY: State statute requires City Council’s acceptance of donations. This requirement is necessary in order to make sure the City Council has knowledge of any restrictions placed on the use of each donation prior to it being expended. The City of St. Louis Park’s Natural Resources Coordinator, Jim Vaughan, will represent the Minnesota Society of Arboriculture (MSA) as their International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) Council Representative Executive Committee member at the 2016 Leadership Workshop, October 24 - 27, 2016. This workshop is an annual event for newly elected ISA committee members covering leadership aspects in the areas of problem solving, project management, team building and the internal intricacies of ISA. The International Society of Arboriculture recently elected Mr. Vaughan to their Council Representative Executive Committee. The ISA requires new Council Executive Committee members to attend an annual ISA Leadership Workshop. As a result of Mr. Vaughan’s election/appointment, the International Society of Arboriculture has offered to pay all related conference expenses in an amount not to exceed $2,000. The City Attorney has reviewed this matter. His opinion is that state law permits the payment of such expenses by this organization, regardless of whether the funds come from primary or secondary sources. It is treated as a gift to the city and needs to be a resolution adopted by the City Council determining that attendance at this event serves a public purpose and accepting the gift. The resolution needs to be adopted before attendance at the conference. The City of St. Louis Park will pay for travel, the conference and hotel accommodations up front and submit receipts to MSA for reimbursement. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: This donation will be used toward the expenses incurred by Jim Vaughan’s attendance to the International Society of Arboriculture Leadership Workshop in Campaign, Illinois. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution Prepared by: Jim Vaughan, Natural Resources Coordinator Reviewed by: Cynthia S. Walsh, Director of Operations & Recreation Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4c) Page 2 Title: Accept Donation from International Society of Arboriculture RESOLUTION NO. 16-__ RESOLUTION ACCEPTING DONATION FROM INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ARBORICULTURE FOR EXPENSES FOR JIM VAUGHAN TO ATTEND THE 2016 INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ARBORICULTURE LEADERSHIP WORKSHOP WHEREAS, The City of St. Louis Park is required by State statute to authorize acceptance of any donations; and WHEREAS, the City Council must also ratify any restrictions placed on the donation by the donor; and WHEREAS, the International Society of Arboriculture will compensate all related costs, in an amount not to exceed $2,000, for the City’s Natural Resources Coordinator, Jim Vaughan, to attend the International Society of Arboriculture Leadership Workshop Conference, October 24 - 27, 2016, in Champaign, Illinois; and NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park that the gift is hereby accepted with thanks to the International Society of Arboriculture with the understanding that it must be used for expenses incurred by Jim Vaughan to attend the 2016 International Society of Arboriculture Leadership Workshop held in Champaign, Illinois. Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council October 17, 2016 City Manager Mayor Attest: City Clerk Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: October 17, 2016 Consent Agenda Item: 4d EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Accept Donation from Athletic Business RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution approving acceptance of a monetary donation from Athletic Business in an amount not to exceed $2,000 for all related expenses for Jason Eisold, Rec Center Manager, to attend the Athletic Business Conference in Orlando, Florida. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish to accept the gift with restrictions on its use? SUMMARY: State statute requires City Council’s acceptance of donations. This requirement is necessary in order to make sure the City Council has knowledge of any restrictions placed on the use of each donation prior to it being expended. The City of St. Louis Park’s Rec Center Manager, Jason Eisold, will attend the Athletic Business Conference, November 17 – 19, 2016 in Orlando Florida. This conference showcases many areas within the parks and recreation industry that will provide opportunities for continuing education within the industry. As a result of being selected as a conference attendee, Athletic Business has offered to pay all related conference expenses in an amount not to exceed $2,000. The City Attorney has reviewed this matter. His opinion is that state law permits the payment of such expenses by this organization, regardless of whether the funds come from primary or secondary sources. It is treated as a gift to the city and needs to be a resolution adopted by the City Council determining that attendance at this event serves a public purpose and accepting the gift. The resolution needs to be adopted before attendance at the conference. The City of St. Louis Park will pay for travel, the conference and hotel accommodations up front and submit receipts to Athletic Business for reimbursement. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: This donation will be used toward the expenses incurred by Jason Eisold’s attendance to the Athletic Business Conference in Orlando, Florida. VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged community. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution Prepared by: Stacy Voelker, Senior Office Assistant Jason Eisold, Rec Center Manager Reviewed by: Cynthia S. Walsh, Director of Operations & Recreation Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4d) Page 2 Title: Accept Donation from Athletic Business RESOLUTION NO. 16-____ RESOLUTION ACCEPTING DONATION FROM ATHLETIC BUSINESS FOR JASON EISOLD’S EXPENSES TO ATTEND THE 2016 ATHLETIC BUSINESS CONFERENCE WHEREAS, The City of St. Louis Park is required by State statute to authorize acceptance of any donations; and WHEREAS, the City Council must also ratify any restrictions placed on the donation by the donor; and WHEREAS, Athletic Business will compensate all related costs, in an amount not to exceed $2,000, for the City’s Rec Center Manager, Jason Eisold, to attend the Athletic Business Conference, November 17 - 19, 2016, in Orlando, Florida; and NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park that the gift is hereby accepted with thanks to Athletic Business with the understanding that it must be used for expenses incurred by Jason Eisold to attend the 2016 Athletic Business Conference held in Orlando, Florida. Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council October 17, 2016 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: October 17, 2016 Consent Agenda Item: 4e EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Special Assessment – Sewer Service Line Repair at 2605 Xylon Avenue South RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution authorizing the special assessment for the repair of the sewer service line at 2605 Xylon Avenue South, St. Louis Park, MN P.I.D.07-117-21-42-0013. POLICY CONSIDERATION: The proposed action is consistent with policy previously established by the City Council. SUMMARY: Candace Huzel, owner of the single family residence at 2605 Xylon Avenue South, has requested the City to authorize the repair of the sewer service line for her home and assess the cost against the property in accordance with the City’s special assessment policy. The City requires the repair of service lines to promote the general public health, safety and welfare within the community. The special assessment policy for the repair or replacement of water or sewer service lines for existing homes was adopted by the City Council in 1996. This program was put into place because sometimes property owners face financial hardships when emergency repairs like this are unexpectedly required. Plans and permits for this service line repair work were completed, submitted, and approved by City staff. The property owner hired a contractor and repaired the sewer service line in compliance with current codes and regulations. Based on the completed work, this repair qualifies for the City’s special assessment program. The property owner has petitioned the City to authorize the sewer service line repair and special assess the cost of the repair. The total eligible cost of the repair has been determined to be $5,665.00. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The City has funds in place to finance the cost of this special assessment. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution Prepared by: Jay Hall, Utility Superintendent Reviewed by: Mark Hanson, Public Works Superintendent Patricia A. Sulander, Accountant Tim Simon, Chief Financial Officer Cynthia S. Walsh, Director of Operations and Recreation Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Page 2 Title: Special Assessment – Sewer Service Line Repair at 2605 Xylon Avenue South RESOLUTION NO. 16-____ RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE REPAIR OF THE SEWER SERVICE LINE AT 2605 XYLON AVENUE SOUTH, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN P.I.D. 07-117-21-42-0013 WHEREAS, the Property Owner at 2605 Xylon Avenue South, has petitioned the City of St. Louis Park to authorize a special assessment for the repair of the sewer service line for the single family residence located at 2605 Xylon Avenue South; and WHEREAS, the Property Owner has agreed to waive the right to a public hearing, right of notice and right of appeal pursuant to Minnesota Statute, Chapter 429; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park has received a report from the Utility Superintendent related to the repair of the sewer service line. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, that: 1. The petition from the Property Owner requesting the approval and special assessment for the sewer service line repair is hereby accepted. 2. The sewer service line repair that was done in conformance with the plans and specifications approved by the Public Works Department and Department of Inspections is hereby accepted. 3. The total cost for the repair of the sewer service line is accepted at $5,665.00. 4. The Property Owner has agreed to waive the right to a public hearing, notice and appeal from the special assessment; whether provided by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, or by other statutes, or by ordinance, City Charter, the constitution, or common law. 5. The Property Owner has agreed to pay the City for the total cost of the above improvements through a special assessment over a ten (10) year period at the interest rate of 4.00%. 6. The Property Owner has executed an agreement with the City and all other documents necessary to implement the repair of the sewer service line and the special assessment of all costs associated therewith. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council October 17, 2016 City Manager Mayor Attest: City Clerk Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: October 17, 2016 Consent Agenda Item: 4f EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Approval of City Disbursements RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to accept for filing City Disbursement Claims for the period of August 27th through October 7, 2016. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council desire to approve City disbursements in accordance with Section 6.11 – Disbursements – How Made, of the City’s Charter? SUMMARY: The Finance Division prepares this report on a monthly basis for the City Council to review and approve. The attached reports show both City disbursements paid by physical check and those by wire transfer or Automated Clearing House (ACH) when applicable. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Review and approval of the information follows the City’s Charter and provides another layer of oversight to further ensure fiscal stewardship. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: City Disbursements Prepared by: Kari Mahan, Accounting Clerk Reviewed by: Tim Simon, Chief Financial Officer 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 1Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 641.26ABELSON, SHARON NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 641.26 154.98ABERNATHY, LISA ORGANIZED REC G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 154.98 114.75ABLE HOSE & RUBBER INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 114.75 31.56ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY INC VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 31.56 1,382.42ABRA MN ST LOUIS PARK UNINSURED LOSS G&A UNINSURED LOSS 1,382.42 5,377.05ACTION FLEET INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 5,377.05 41,693.32ADVANCED DISPOSAL SERVICES SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS YARD WASTE SERVICE 14,135.16SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL YARD WASTE SERVICE 55,828.48 2,000.00ALDRICH REAL ESTATE LLC.ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 2,000.00 16.44ALL AMERICAN TITLE CO INC WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 16.44 59.50ALL STAR SPORTS INACTIVE - YOUTH PRGMS GENERAL SUPPLIES 59.50 2,550.00ALLIANCE FOR INNOVATION ADMINISTRATION G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 2,550.00 863.00ALLIANCE MECH SRVCS INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 863.00 881.65ALLIED BLACKTOP PATCHING-PERMANENT OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 881.65 665.00ALVIRA CATHERINE ESCROWS PMC ESCROW City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 2 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 2Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 665.00 4,143.60AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING INC PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT SOIL TESTING SERVICES 4,143.60 246.68AMERICAN TIRE DISTRIBUTORS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 246.68 79.00AMERICAN TRAFFIC SAFETY SERVICES ASSOC PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 79.00 1,810.95ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 50.75POLICE G & A POLICE EQUIPMENT 225.68ERUOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 912.00OPERATIONSRADIO COMMUNICATIONS 2,999.38 24.05ANDERSON LAUREN WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 24.05 26.93ANDERSON, EMILY WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 26.93 138.71ANDERSON, TRACY NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 138.71 208.37ANDREWS, KELLY WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 208.37 50.45ANTONEN JAMIE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 50.45 1,091.84APACHE GROUP OF MINNESOTA REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,091.84 1,325.00ARMSTRONG, NATE ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 1,325.00 4,500.00ASCHE, TODD ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 4,500.00 City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 3 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 3Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 238.94ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 950.00GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 1,188.94 500.00ASPEN LAWN SERVICE/SIPE'S ENTERPRISES IN ROUTINE MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 500.00 85.53ASPEN MILLS OPERATIONS UNIFORMS 982.40OPERATIONSPROTECTIVE CLOTHING 4,528.57OPERATIONSEMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 5,596.50 64,154.02ASTECHPAVEMENT MANAGEMENT B/S RETAINED PERCENTAGE 1,100.00CONSTRUCTION PAYMENTS IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 65,254.02 170.92AT&T MOBILITY CELLPHONES, IPADS, ETC.OFFICE EQUIPMENT 170.92 1,856.10ATIR ELECTRIC CORPORATION FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 1,856.10 900.00ATOMPOLICE G & A TRAINING 900.00 46.00ATOMIC RECYCLING FACILITIES MCTE G & A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 46.00PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 46.00WATER UTILITY G&A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 46.00VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 184.00 99.96AUTO PLUS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 99.96 7,438.35AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 7,438.35 81.95AUTOMOBILE SERVICE GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 81.95 37.73AVEX LLC HUMAN RESOURCES RECOGNITION City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 4 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 4Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 37.73 5,266.65AVI SYSTEMS INC OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 5,266.65 1,300.00BACHMANSPARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE LANDSCAPING SERVICE 1,008.65BEAUTIFICATION / FLOWERS LANDSCAPING MATERIALS 2,308.65 425.00BADHWA, TYRON GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 425.00 250.00BALKO, LINDA J GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 250.00 1,500.00BARANNIKOV, ALESJSEY ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 1,500.00 114.73BARKER HANNA WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 114.73 2,357.82BARNA, GUZY & STEFFEN LTD HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,357.82 340.21BARTMANN, KARI WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 340.21 400.00BARTON SAND & GRAVEL CO PATCHING-PERMANENT OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 175.00WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 225.00PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT MAINTENAN OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 800.00 15.95BATTERIES + BULBS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 94.94WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 110.89 150.00BEALKE INDUSTRIES, ROBERT HOLIDAY PROGRAMS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 150.00 27.36BECK ADAM WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 27.36 City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 5 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 5Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 64,448.49BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 102.02ARENA MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 64,550.51 114.83BECKER, PHIL WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 114.83 66,569.50BERGERSON CASWELL INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 66,569.50 450.00BERGFORD ARCHITECTURE, JOHN GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 450.00 99.82BERKOVITZ, GARY REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 99.82 398.54BERSCHEID, GARY NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 398.54 118.78BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS COMM & MARKETING G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 118.78 93.65BERTHIAUME, BRUCE WATER UTILITY G&A TRAINING 176.04WATER UTILITY G&A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 269.69 1,644.91BIGALKE, SCOTT A.WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 1,644.91 1,200.00BISHOP, BARBARA ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 1,200.00 75.00BLEET JACK GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 75.00 34.29BLODEN JACKIE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 34.29 2,488.30BLOOMINGTON, CITY OF REILLY BUDGET OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,488.30 City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 6 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 6Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 300.00BOBBY & STEVE'S AUTO WORLD ARENA MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 300.00 5.02BOHLINGER, DEBRA WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 5.02 8,672.85BOLTON & MENK INC STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7,567.50STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 16,240.35 8,880.00BORMANN CONSTRUCTION INC RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 980.00PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 1,500.00PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 8,710.00PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT MAINTENAN OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 20,070.00 554.42BOUND TREE MEDICAL, LLC OPERATIONS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 554.42 299.45BOYER TRUCKS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 299.45 3,260.00BRAD'S LANDSCAPING LLC CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,260.00 5,326.50BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5,326.50 56.59BRECOUNT, JOHN WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 56.59 17,899.00BREDEMUS HARDWARE COMPANY INC PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 17,899.00 1,363.15BRIN NORTHWESTERN GLASS CO FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 1,363.15 169.60BRO TEX INC WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 169.60 City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 7 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 7Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 468.56BROOKSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 468.56 58.97BRUMMER, CRYSTAL WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 58.97 233.34BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC ALLEY MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 233.34 20.00BUDGET SIGN & GRAPHICS POLICE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 20.00 10.77BUDISH, ANDREW WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 10.77 3,000.00BUELL CONSULTING INC WATER UTILITY BALANCE SHEET GENERAL 8,645.00WATER UTILITY G&A RENT REVENUE 11,645.00 105.48BURKE, CAROLYN REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 105.48 196.39BURKMAN, ELISHA WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 196.39 207.72BURNET TITLE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 207.72 44.70BURR, SUSAN CLERICAL TRAVEL/MEETINGS 44.70 9,296.00CALGON CARBON CORP REILLY BUDGET CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SUPPLY 9,296.00 741.00CALHOUN TOWERS APTS OPERATIONS RADIO COMMUNICATIONS 741.00 178.70CAL-TEX INSPECTIONS G & A ELECTRICAL 178.70 11,646.73CAMPBELL KNUTSON PROF ASSOC ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL SERVICES City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 8 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 8Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 1,233.91ENGINEERING G & A LEGAL SERVICES 1,326.75CABLE TV G & A LEGAL SERVICES 2,098.47STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A LEGAL SERVICES 16,305.86 17.98CAPITAL ONE COMMERCIAL WESTWOOD G & A CONCESSION SUPPLIES 88.00JUNIOR NATURALISTS CONCESSION SUPPLIES 105.98 80.00CARTNEY, COLBY INSPECTIONS G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 80.00 45.60CASTON, JENNIFER SEASON PASSES PROGRAM REVENUE 45.60 371.43CDW GOVERNMENT INC POLICE G & A COMPUTER SUPPLIES 18,385.36PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 50,298.50TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 69,055.29 2,125.00CEE HOUSING SOLUTIONS LLC MOVE-UP PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 17,864.00TRANSFORMATION LOAN OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 19,989.00 2,125.00CENTER FOR ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT MOVE-UP PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 17,864.00TRANSFORMATION LOAN OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 19,989.00 10,000.00CENTER FOR SOCIAL INCLUSION INC HUMAN RESOURCES ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT 10,000.00 966.15CENTERPOINT ENERGY FACILITY OPERATIONS HEATING GAS 1,165.95WATER UTILITY G&A HEATING GAS 28.69REILLY G & A HEATING GAS 42.45SEWER UTILITY G&A ELECTRIC SERVICE 1,358.52SEWER UTILITY G&A HEATING GAS 251.06PARK MAINTENANCE G & A HEATING GAS 21.78WESTWOOD G & A HEATING GAS 38.16NATURALIST PROGRAMMER HEATING GAS 3,872.76 City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 9 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 9Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 239.55CENTERPOINT ENERGY SERVICES INC FACILITY OPERATIONS HEATING GAS 10,970.13REC CENTER BUILDING HEATING GAS 11,209.68 15,960.00CENTRAL PENSION FUND EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S OTHER RETIREMENT 15,960.00 2,700.00CENTURY COLLEGE OPERATIONS TRAINING 2,700.00 293.55CENTURY FENCE COMPANY CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 293.55 13,723.20CENTURY LINK E-911 PROGRAM EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 261.60CELLPHONES, IPADS, ETC.TELEPHONE 13,984.80 500.00CFS INSPECTIONS OPERATIONS EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 500.00 230.00CHANDLER, STEPHANIE INSPECTIONS G & A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE 230.00 33.97CHRISTIANSEN MARK WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 33.97 387.46CINTAS CORPORATION FACILITIES MCTE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 174.83FACILITIES MCTE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,197.56WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 854.36SEWER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 68.43AQUATIC PARK BUDGET OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 68.43AQUATIC PARK BUDGET CONCESSION SUPPLIES 1,308.79AQUATIC PARK G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 136.86AQUATIC PARK G & A CONCESSION SUPPLIES 635.87VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 4,832.59 1,158.38CITIZENS INDEPENDENT BANK GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 397.01ADMINISTRATION G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 797.27ADMINISTRATION G & A MEETING EXPENSE 89.61HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 10 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 10Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 213.56HUMAN RESOURCES ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT 1,576.30HUMAN RESOURCES RECOGNITION 185.00HUMAN RESOURCES TRAINING 422.14HUMAN RESOURCES MEETING EXPENSE 585.00COMM & MARKETING G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 484.82COMM & MARKETING G & A PRINTING & PUBLISHING 50.00COMM & MARKETING G & A TRAINING 1,277.85COMM & MARKETING G & A TRAVEL/MEETINGS 799.78COMM & MARKETING G & A MEETING EXPENSE 300.00IT G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 4.50IT G & A TRAINING 23.50POSTAL SERVICES POSTAGE 49.97RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES 68.61ASSESSING G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 437.00ASSESSING G & A TRAINING 223.00ASSESSING G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 112.40ASSESSING G & A LICENSES 300.00FINANCE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 720.00FINANCE G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 2,540.62COMM DEV PLANNING G & A TRAINING 981.17FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 659.96FACILITIES MCTE G & A OTHER 21.96POLICE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 976.63POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 141.93POLICE G & A BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 717.00POLICE G & A TRAINING 1,050.00POLICE G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 20.97POLICE G & A MEETING EXPENSE 120.00POLICE G & A LICENSES 33.43NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 55.45OPERATIONSGENERAL SUPPLIES 81.96OPERATIONSFIRE PREVENTION SUPPLIES 696.38OPERATIONSOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 1,138.68OPERATIONSSMALL TOOLS 1,093.49OPERATIONSPROTECTIVE CLOTHING 69.85OPERATIONSRADIO COMMUNICATIONS 156.83OPERATIONSTRAINING 10,585.82OPERATIONSSEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 280.00INSPECTIONS G & A TRAINING 266.26PUBLIC WORKS G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 980.00PUBLIC WORKS G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 11 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 11Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 134.31ENGINEERING G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 377.00ENGINEERING G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 419.85PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 73.95PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A COMPUTER SUPPLIES 1,072.03TV PRODUCTION OFFICE EQUIPMENT 299.00TV PRODUCTION EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 6.23PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT POSTAGE 82.90PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT MEETING EXPENSE 15.99CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 200.00WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 23.58WATER UTILITY G&A SMALL TOOLS 1,580.00WATER UTILITY G&A TRAINING 250.00WATER UTILITY G&A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 1,096.27SEWER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 636.00SEWER UTILITY G&A TRAINING 65.00ENVIRONMENT & SUSTAINABILITY TRAINING 1,409.11TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 461.28CELLPHONES, IPADS, ETC.OFFICE EQUIPMENT 5,198.56ORGANIZED REC G & A TRAINING 28.07ORGANIZED REC G & A INTEREST/FINANCE CHARGES 83.48KICKBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 37.18SOFTBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 531.35HOLIDAY PROGRAMS GENERAL SUPPLIES 260.30PLAYGROUNDSGENERAL SUPPLIES 53.80FABULOUS FRIDAYS GENERAL SUPPLIES 251.88FABULOUS FRIDAYS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 42.90INACTIVE - YOUTH PRGMS GENERAL SUPPLIES 47.00INACTIVE - YOUTH PRGMS POSTAGE 204.82PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 180.00PARK MAINTENANCE G & A TRAINING 25.11NATURAL RESOURCES G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 1,054.67NATURAL RESOURCES G & A TRAINING 260.98BEAUTIFICATION / FLOWERS LANDSCAPING MATERIALS 275.39WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 27.36WESTWOOD G & A CONCESSION SUPPLIES 133.13JUNIOR NATURALISTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 629.33REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES 675.80REC CENTER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 340.00REC CENTER BUILDING TRAINING 274.95ARENA MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 275.00ARENA MAINTENANCE SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 12 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 12Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 26.78AQUATIC PARK BUDGET GENERAL SUPPLIES 116.99AQUATIC PARK G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 27.74AQUATIC PARK G & A CONCESSION SUPPLIES 247.00AQUATIC PARK G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 431.54LIFEGUARDINGGENERAL SUPPLIES 11.28CONCESSIONSCONCESSION SUPPLIES 34.50VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 52,933.48 762.40CLAREY'S SAFETY EQUIPMENT INC OPERATIONS REPAIRS 762.40 4,825.54CLEAN HARBORS ENV SERVICES INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 4,825.54 4.89COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO CONCESSIONS CONCESSION SUPPLIES 4.89 34.90COCCOLUTO JOSHUA WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 34.90 22.59COLEMAN, SCOTT WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 22.59 19,210.76COLICH & ASSOCIATES ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL SERVICES 19,210.76 7,622.22COLLINS ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTION CO SYSTEM REPAIR OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 7,622.22 249.00COLOMBINI, RICHARD WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 249.00 126.92COMCASTOPERATIONSEMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 20.48OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 284.55WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 13.63REC CENTER BUILDING OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 445.58 42,830.26COMMERCIAL ASPHALT COMPANY PATCHING-PERMANENT OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 3,220.37WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 13 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 13Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 2,536.91PARK MAINTENANCE G & A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 48,587.54 19,465.00-COMMERCIAL REFRIGERATION SYSTEMS INC PARK IMPROVE BALANCE SHEET RETAINED PERCENTAGE 389,300.00PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 369,835.00 91.73COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 91.73 4,850.00COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP SUB HENN EMERGENCY REPAIR GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,850.00 539.00COMPAR INC POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 539.00 66,616.00CONCRETE ETC INC PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 66,616.00 100.00CONIARIS FATHER WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 100.00 3,653.32CONTINENTAL CASUALTY CO EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S LONG TERM CARE INSUR 3,653.32 623.63CONTINENTAL RESEARCH CORP REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES 623.63 144.38CORAZZO, JENN WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 144.38 175.26CORNERSTONE TITLE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 175.26 526.40COUGHLIN, JUDY FITNESS PROGRAMS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 526.40 10,530.00COVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES FACILITIES MCTE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 10,530.00 152.36CRAIG, JAY WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 14 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 14Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 152.36 571.35CREATIVE PRODUCT SOURCING INC - DARE DARE PROGRAM OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 571.35 490.51CREEKSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 490.51 90.85CROWN MARKING INC COMM & MARKETING G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 90.85 435.79CUB FOODS POLICE G & A SUBSISTENCE SUPPLIES 32.66POLICE G & A MEETING EXPENSE 468.45 3,342.85CUMMINS NPOWER LLC FACILITIES MCTE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,154.61FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 753.89SEWER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 1,643.88REC CENTER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 904.35REC CENTER BUILDING EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 100.00GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 7,899.58 408.00CURRAN-MOORE, KIM SOFTBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 408.00 36.78CUSTOM PRODUCTS & SERVICES SSD 1 G&A LANDSCAPING MATERIALS 4,401.50SSD 1 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 583.50SSD 1 G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 2,033.00SSD 2 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,625.75SSD 2 G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 996.50SSD 3 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,838.00SSD #4 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,145.00SSD #5 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 699.50SSD #6 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 14,359.53 842.42DALCO ENTERPRISES INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SUPPLY 215.10REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,057.52 City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 15 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 15Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 1,500.00DAVIS, PAIGE ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 1,500.00 78.52DELEGARD TOOL CO VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 78.52 4,704.51DEPT LABOR & INDUSTRY INSPECTIONS G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 4,704.51 164.66DERESKOS AKRIVI WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 164.66 150.00DEX MEDIA EAST LLC ENTERPRISE G & A ADVERTISING 150.00 523.20DILORENZO, KIRK POLICE G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 523.20 521.85DISCOUNT STEEL INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 521.85 25,000.00DJ ELECTRIC SERVICES INC OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 3,000.00-PARK IMPROVE BALANCE SHEET RETAINED PERCENTAGE 67,028.40PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 5,626.89REC CENTER BUILDING BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 94,655.29 3,490.55DO-GOOD.BIZ INC COMM & MARKETING G & A POSTAGE 7,414.75COMM & MARKETING G & A PRINTING & PUBLISHING 10,905.30 123.49DOTSON BARBARA WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 123.49 418.24DRYWALL SUPPLY INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 418.24 1.00DUERST, REBECCA INSPECTIONS G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 50.00INSPECTIONS G & A PLUMBING 51.00 City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 16 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 16Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 318.75-EBERT CONSTRUCTION PARK IMPROVE BALANCE SHEET RETAINED PERCENTAGE 6,375.00PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 6,056.25 644.00ECM PUBLISHERS INC ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL NOTICES 550.00COMM & MARKETING G & A ADVERTISING 1,194.00 38.86EDGEWATER TITLE GROUP WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 38.86 38.36EDINA REALTY TITLE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 38.36 15.21EDWARDS, MARTI WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 15.21 1,435.43EGAN COMPANIES INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 3,428.03SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 4,863.46 731.25EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC ESCROWS ELIOT PARK 187.50ESCROWSENCORE (BADER DEV/ASAP) 1,900.002010D FIRE STAT DEBT SERV G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,900.002014A GO DEBT SERV G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,718.75 54.26EISLAND ROB WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 54.26 684.30ELECTRIC PUMP INC SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 1,141.58STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 1,825.88 343.48ELIOT VIEW NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 343.48 435.08EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 435.08 75.00ENCORE BROKERS IT G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 17 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 17Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 75.00 3,791.96ENTERPRISE FM TRUST EQUIP/VEHICLE REPLACEMENT RENTAL EQUIPMENT 3,791.96 186.41ENTITLEWATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 186.41 11,570.00EPIC SECURITY PROFESSIONALS INC PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 11,570.00 400.00ERICKSON, RICHARD PERFORMING ARTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 400.00 8,540.00ESRITECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 8,540.00 320.00ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC REC CENTER BUILDING BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 320.00 3,200.00EVAN URIBE ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 3,200.00 487.50EVERS, LUANN GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 487.50 19.99EXECUTIVE TITLE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 19.99 1,729.01FACTORY MOTOR PARTS CO GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 322.84FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 2,051.85 47,960.04FARBER SOUND INC PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 47,960.04 69.36FARKAS, TERRY WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 69.36 12.35FASTENAL COMPANY FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 130.77SEWER UTILITY G&A SMALL TOOLS City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 18 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 18Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 25.78REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES 168.90 140.00FAUE, SAE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 140.00 159,996.33-FERGUSON WATERWORKS WATER UTILITY BALANCE SHEET RETAINED PERCENTAGE 522,215.29WATER UTILITY G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 362,218.96 741.29FERGUSON, JANE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 741.29 47.88FERRELLGASREC CENTER BUILDING MOTOR FUELS 47.88 207.00FILTRATION SYSTEMS INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 207.00 4,623.65FIRE CATT LLC OPERATIONS EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 4,623.65 156.00FIRE RESCUE OPERATIONS SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 156.00 10,570.09FIRE SAFETY USA INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 2,810.20TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 1,134.73GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 14,515.02 64.00FIRST ADVANTAGE LNS SCREENING SOLUTIONS HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 64.00 10,808.10FISCHER MINING LLC PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 10,808.10 545.00FISCHLER & ASSOCIATES PA POLICE G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 545.00POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,090.00 179.40FISHER, KALA PUBLIC WORKS G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 19 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 19Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 179.40 60.00FLUGUM, ERIC WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 60.00 1,900.00FORECAST PUBLIC ART ESCROWS GENERAL 1,900.00 12.96FOSTER, ALISON AQUATIC PARK BUDGET MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 12.96 61.46FOWLER ELECTRIC COMPANY GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 61.46 20.88FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 20.88 37.90FRATTALONE'S/SAINT LOUIS PARK WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 11.29PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 45.98GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES 95.17 157.37FREDRICK DE CE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 157.37 2,308.50FRONTIER FIRE PROTECTION INC.PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 2,308.50 14.13GARTNER, KEN WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 14.13 590.00GAS TANK RENU/RADIATOR WEST GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 590.00 11,327.95GEAR WASH LLC OPERATIONS TESTING & CALIBRATION 11,327.95 487.50GEORGE ELIZABETH GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 487.50 203.29GLOCKE, DAWN WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 20 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 20Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 203.29 1,013.85GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 1,013.85 1.00GRAF, MELVIN INSPECTIONS G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 50.00INSPECTIONS G & A PLUMBING 51.00 66.60GRAFIX SHOPPE UNINSURED LOSS G&A UNINSURED LOSS 66.60 398.49GRAGE, ANDREA NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 398.49 246.91GRAGERT, OLIVER WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 246.91 43.92GRAINGER INC, WW GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 32.62SPLASH PAD MAINT - Oak Hill Pk GENERAL SUPPLIES 76.54 1,823.15GRANITE LEDGE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS WIRING REPAIR OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,823.15 34.34GRAY CHRISTINE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 34.34 461.94GREAT NORTHERN LANDSCAPES INC CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 461.94 1,476.68GREEN HORIZONS WEED CONTROL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,476.68 345.59GRES, ADINA WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 345.59 111.50GRIFFIN, DANIEL WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 111.50 477.12GROUP HEALTH INC - WORKSITE EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A HEALTH INSURANCE City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 21 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 21Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 477.12 225.00GUNSTAD, MARK GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 225.00 5,432.03H & R CONST CO DAMAGE REPAIR OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,432.03 600.19HACH CO WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 600.19 27.00HALBERT, JENNIFER WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 27.00 250.00HALVERSON, DANNEKA GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 250.00 816.00HAMILTON, MIKE SOFTBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 816.00 1,275.00HAMLINE UNIVERSITY TRAINING SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 1,275.00 99.82HAMMER, MARTIN WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 99.82 38.28HAMPTON, ROBERT WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 38.28 212.50HANNAFIN MICHELLE GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 212.50 1,038.50HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON INC STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,038.50 10,949.33-HARDRIVES INC STREET CAPITAL PROJ BAL SHEET RETAINED PERCENTAGE 410,273.22CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 399,323.89 16.22HART, MEGHAN WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 16.22 City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 22 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 22Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 80.00HASTINGS, ELIZABETH WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 80.00 12,025.88HAWKINS INC WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 5,142.31AQUATIC PARK G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 17,168.19 3,119.31HCI CHEMTEC INC PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 3,119.31 1,415.10HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER 1,415.10 70.00HEAD JUSTIN OPERATIONS TRAINING 70.00 539.91HEALTHETECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 539.91 324.00HEDBERG SUPPLY STORM WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT PARTS 324.00 180.00HEL-FIRE OPERATIONS PROTECTIVE CLOTHING 180.00 202.00HENDEL PLUMBING CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 202.00 433.50HENDERSON, TRACY SOFTBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 433.50 230.00HENNEPIN COUNTY INSPECTIONS G & A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE 230.00 1,428.00HENNEPIN COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE DWI ENFORCEMENT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,428.00 100.00HENNEPIN COUNTY FIRE CHIEFS ASSOC OPERATIONS SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 100.00 City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 23 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 23Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 550.00HENNEPIN COUNTY INFO TECH IT G & A COMPUTER SERVICES 550.00 2,568.00HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER OPERATIONS TRAINING 2,568.00 85.50HENNEPIN COUNTY RESIDENT & REAL ESTATE ASSESSING G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 85.50 2,378.24HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER POLICE G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 7,685.98POLICE G & A SUBSISTENCE SERVICE 2,694.10OPERATIONSRADIO COMMUNICATIONS 569.92PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE 13,328.24 494.39HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE OPERATIONS TRAINING 494.39 830.88HENRICKSEN PSG FACILITIES MCTE G & A OTHER 9,201.21OPERATIONSGENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 30,748.03MUNICIPAL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 40,780.12 817.95HICKS, MAGGIE EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A TUITION 817.95 5,665.00HIGHVIEW PLUMBING INC SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 5,665.00 605.46HILL CO, ROBERT B GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 605.46 162.57HOANG THO WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 162.57 109.08HOFFMAN, MICHAEL WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 109.08 710.00HOLIDAY INN SUITES ST CLOUD NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH TRAINING 710.00 City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 24 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 24Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 1,134.75HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 5.27PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES PATCHING-PERMANENT EQUIPMENT PARTS 13.95ROUTINE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT PARTS 134.09ROUTINE MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 30.97RELAMPINGOTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 361.15WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 89.76PARK MAINTENANCE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 79.97PARK MAINTENANCE G & A SMALL TOOLS 14.04IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 141.58PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 9.97BEAUTIFICATION / FLOWERS SMALL TOOLS 39.80BEAUTIFICATION / FLOWERS LANDSCAPING MATERIALS 65.97WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,279.41REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES 3,400.68 95.50HOME DEPOT CREDIT SRVCS WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 95.50 101.14HOME TITLE INC WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 101.14 82.85HOPE, BRUCE & ANNE REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 82.85 95.04HOPPE, MARK ASSESSING G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 95.04 357.00HORDYK, EVAN SOFTBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 357.00 200.00HOREJSI DUSTIN WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 200.00 4,236.21-HORWITZ INC PARK IMPROVE BALANCE SHEET RETAINED PERCENTAGE 84,724.05PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 80,487.84 7.69HOWELLS, MALORIE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 7.69 City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 25 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 25Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 50.00HOWES, JEFFREY VOLLEYBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 375.00KICKBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 425.00 50.00HOWES, JENNIFER VOLLEYBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 75.00KICKBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 125.00 150.00HOWES, KRISTINE VOLLEYBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 275.00KICKBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 255.00SOFTBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 680.00 1,592.90I.U.O.E. LOCAL NO 49 EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S UNION DUES 1,592.90 19.00IATNVEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 19.00 29.26IBIZA LLC.WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 29.26 625.00ICCINSPECTIONS G & A TRAINING 625.00 120.00IMBESI, DUSTIN WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 120.00 3,182.51IMPACT PROVEN SOLUTIONS WATER UTILITY G&A POSTAGE 602.99SEWER UTILITY G&A POSTAGE 602.99SOLID WASTE G&A POSTAGE 602.99STORM WATER UTILITY G&A POSTAGE 4,991.48 63.95INDELCOROUTINE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT PARTS 89.00WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 67.55STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 80.95SPLASH PAD MAINT - Oak Hill Pk GENERAL SUPPLIES 301.45 City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 26 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 26Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 4,399.62INTEGRA TELECOM IT G & A TELEPHONE 4,399.62 2,998.17INTELLIGERECOMM & MARKETING G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,998.17 63.43INTERNATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION OPERATIONS FIRE ALARM & SPRINKLER 63.43 22.50INTL SECURITY PRODUCTS OFF-LEASH DOG PARK GENERAL SUPPLIES 22.50 210.00INTOXIMETERS INC POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 210.00 418.49INVER GROVE FORD GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 418.49 40.73INVESTORS CAPITAL LLC WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 40.73 80.00ISENBERG, ALVIN WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 80.00 279.04I-STATE TRUCK CENTER GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 279.04 185.85J & F REDDY RENTS ADMINISTRATION G & A RENTAL EQUIPMENT 59.40WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 245.25 144.77JAMES, LADAWN WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 144.77 145.08JANNETTE, PATRICK WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 145.08 3,000.00JEFFERSON FIRE & SAFETY INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 980.00OPERATIONSOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 411.36OPERATIONSSMALL TOOLS 324.39OPERATIONSPROTECTIVE CLOTHING City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 27 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 27Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 2,097.02EQUIP/VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FIRE EQUIPMENT 7,362.88EQUIP/VEHICLE REPLACEMENT MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENT 14,175.65 25.14JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 7.82DAMAGE REPAIR OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 50.60PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 8.99PARK MAINTENANCE G & A SMALL TOOLS 6.82WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 3.41GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES 102.78 487.50JOAN MEATH & GARY COLACINO GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 487.50 4,500.00JOBSINMINNEAPOLIS.COM HUMAN RESOURCES RECRUITMENT 4,500.00 112.97JOHANSON, DAVID REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 112.97 275.00JOHN NAGENGAST DOORS, LLC.REC CENTER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 275.00 22.43JOHNSON JACOB WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 22.43 1,000.00JOHNSON, HOLLY ANN ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 1,000.00 28.47JOHNSON, LESLIE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 28.47 650.00JOHNSON, SUSAN KICKBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 650.00 54.95JOURNAL OF LIGHT CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONS G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 54.95 115.51JOYCE JOHN WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 115.51 City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 28 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 28Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 29.28KAISER, KEN FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 29.28 55.13KAMPA, MARK POLICE G & A TRAVEL/MEETINGS 55.13 46.39KAPP CHAELENE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 46.39 300.00KASS, SIDNEY WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 300.00 483.03KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 483.03 1,347.00KEEPRS INC POLICE G & A POLICE EQUIPMENT 25.99POLICE G & A POSTAGE 1,372.99 754.62KELLER, JASMINE Z EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S WAGE GARNISHMENTS 754.62 765.90KENNEDY & GRAVEN ESCROWS ELIOT PARK 765.90 2,500.00KENWORTHY MARIA ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 2,500.00 92.50KIDCREATE STUDIO HOLIDAY PROGRAMS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 342.00ARTOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 135.00LITTLE TOT PLAYTIME OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 569.50 1,846.24KIEFER SWIM PRODUCTS AQUATIC PARK G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 1,846.24 1,187.36KILLMER ELECTRIC CO INC WIRING REPAIR OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,187.36 88,235.06KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 29 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 29Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 88,235.06 217.53KLATH, RYAN WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 217.53 311.03KNUDSON, ROBERT & JANET TREE MAINTENANCE TREE MAINTENANCE 311.03 68.50KNUDSON, VICKY REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 68.50 82.89KOERING, STEVE OPERATIONS SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 1,231.20EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A TUITION 1,314.09 841.50KOLLING, JAKE SOFTBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 841.50 12.57KONZ, RACHEL WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 12.57 114.74KRANTZ, JILL WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 114.74 58.74KRAUS- ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION CO. INSPECTIONS G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 910.40INSPECTIONS G & A BUILDING 160.00ENGINEERING G & A PUBLIC WORKS 1,129.14 6,013.06KRECH, O'BRIEN, MUELLER & WASS INC MUNICIPAL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 6,013.06 298.75KRISS PREMIUM PRODUCTS INC REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES 509.50REC CENTER BUILDING BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 808.25 1,418.08KRUGE-AIR INC BLDG/GROUNDS OPS & MAINT BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 1,418.08 310.00KWOCK DER FACILITY ROOM RENTAL RENT REVENUE 310.00 City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 30 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 30Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 51.91LAFFERTY, DUSTIN WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 51.91 49.00LAKES GAS CO PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 49.00 59.23LAMBERT, DENNIS WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 59.23 255.91LARSON JACQELINE COMM & MARKETING G & A TRAVEL/MEETINGS 255.91 84.69LARSON, DAN REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 84.69 26.00LARSON, JACQUELINE COMM & MARKETING G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 41.04COMM & MARKETING G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 67.04 170.32LARSON, JH CO FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 170.32 .25LAUDERDALE PROPERTIES INSPECTIONS G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 55.00INSPECTIONS G & A BUILDING 55.25 2,751.10LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES INC EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S UNION DUES 2,751.10 371.94LAWSON PRODUCTS INC REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES 371.94 116,498.00LEAGUE MN CITIES INS TRUST EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A League of MN Cities dept'l exp 116,498.00 29,467.00LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES ADMINISTRATION G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 29,467.00 8,747.03LEAGUE OF MN CITIES EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A League of MN Cities dept'l exp 8,747.03 City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 31 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 31Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 1,401.43LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INSURANCE TRUST UNINSURED LOSS G&A UNINSURED LOSS 1,401.43 75.00LEANNA, ERICA GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 75.00 44.18LEE GARETT WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 44.18 215.46LEE, KATIE PLAYGROUNDS MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 215.46 3,150.00LEER COMMUNICATION & CONSULTANTS COMM & MARKETING G & A TRAINING 3,150.00 325.00LEGACY CREATIVE IMAGES HOLIDAY PROGRAMS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 325.00 87.19LEITHER JAMES WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 87.19 118.08LEITTEN, PETER WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 118.08 33.14LEONARD, DONNA WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 33.14 139.49LEWIS MELVIN WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 139.49 1,095.16LIBERTY ENVELOPE COMM & MARKETING G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 1,095.16 42.61LIBERTY TITLE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 42.61 22.18LIDDIARD MONICA WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 22.18 3,680.82LINAEMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A LONG TERM DISABILITY City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 32 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 32Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 3,680.82 348.24LINDBLOM, TIM WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 348.24 34.01LINDMARK PATRICK WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 34.01 100.00LINDSAY, JEFFREY WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 100.00 171.69LISA ANN MARIA REVOCABLE TRUST AGREEMENTWATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 171.69 212.06LITTLE FALLS MACHINE INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 212.06 170.45LOCKGUARD INC REC CENTER BUILDING BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 170.45 13,607.69LOCKRIDGE GRINDAL NAUEN PLLP REILLY G & A LEGAL SERVICES 13,607.69 2,779.74LOFFLER COMPANIES IT G & A OFFICE EQUIPMENT 2,779.74 34,651.09LOGISIT G & A COMPUTER SERVICES 15,210.00TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 49,861.09 237.06LOMBARDI, JIM ORGANIZED REC G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 237.06 3,121.28LOOKOUT BAR & GRILL HUMAN RESOURCES RECOGNITION 3,121.28 1,086.40LUSE, JOHN POLICE G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 1,086.40 3,080.00LYNCH CAMPS, INC SAFETY CAMPS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,080.00 City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 33 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 33Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 4,609.80M&P ENGINEERING & SURVEYING ASSOC PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 4,609.80 422.19MACQUEEN EQUIP CO GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 63.22SEWER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT PARTS 485.41 4.86MAGNUSON, ASHLEY AQUATIC PARK BUDGET MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 4.86 37.07MANGAN, MICHAEL WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 37.07 18,067.73MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 18,067.73 50.89MARKOVITS, ALAN WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 50.89 115.00MARPHYLL PROP LLC WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 115.00 1,500.00MARQUETTE ADVISORS COMM DEV PLANNING G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,500.00 90.07MARTENS, AFTON JOINT COMM POLICE PARTNERSHIP MEETING EXPENSE 90.07 1,020.00MASTER TECHNOLOGY GROUP PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 1,020.00 30.06MATHESON TRI-GAS INC VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 30.06 330.25MAY, JOHN WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 330.25 105.48MCCARTY-DAWSON, CYNTHIA REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 105.48 City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 34 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 34Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 25.75MCCONNELL, BECKY WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 41.93SCHOOL GROUPS CONCESSION SUPPLIES 67.68 43.15MCCOY, WILLIAM PETROLEUM FUELS INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 43.15 75.00MCDONELL, TRACIE GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 75.00 230.00MCKENNA, ERIN INSPECTIONS G & A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE 230.00 118.27MELOM, MARVIN WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 118.27 10.85MELVIN, TESSOA WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 10.85 99.88MENARDSSYSTEM REPAIR OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 47.53WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 29.64PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 188.58IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 37.84PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 21.16PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 198.80WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 623.43 58.94MERKLEY, SCOTT PUBLIC WORKS G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 58.94 100.00METCALF, SAMANTHA WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 100.00 12,300.75METROPOLITAN COUNCIL INSPECTIONS G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 9,797.93REILLY BUDGET CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 348,097.01OPERATIONSCLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 370,195.69 74.95MICRO CENTER PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 74.96WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 35 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 35Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 149.91 780.00MID AMERICA BUSINESS SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 780.00 866.91MIDWEST BADGE & NOVELTY CO HUMAN RESOURCES RECOGNITION 866.91 50,146.21MILL CITY HARDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 50,146.21 193.85MINER, DANIEL WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 193.85 1,075.00MINIKAHDA VISTA NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,075.00 476.10MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPT PAWN FEES OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 476.10 75.00MINNESOTA AMBULANCE ASSOCIATION OPERATIONS SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 75.00 153.07MINNESOTA BENEFIT ASSOC EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S ACCRUED OTHER BENEFITS 153.07 495.00MINNESOTA BUREAU CRIMINAL APPREHENSION POLICE G & A TRAINING 495.00 221.49MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PYT CTR EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S WAGE GARNISHMENTS 221.49 21,558.00MINNESOTA DEPT HEALTH WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 21,558.00 40.00MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEALTH WATER UTILITY G&A LICENSES 40.00 110.00MINNESOTA FIRE SVC CERT BD OPERATIONS TRAINING 110.00 City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 36 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 36Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 12,623.31MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 12,623.31 110.00MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY SEWER UTILITY G&A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 110.00 250.00MINNESOTA RURAL WATER ASSOC WATER UTILITY G&A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 250.00 900.00MINNESOTA STATE FIRE CHIEFS ASSOC.OPERATIONS SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 900.00 48,500.00MINNESOTA/WISCONSIN PLAYGROUND PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 48,500.00 23.23MINNETONKA TITLE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 23.23 3,500.00MINTZ, MARSHALL ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 3,500.00 250.00MINUTEMAN PRESS COMM & MARKETING G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 250.00 20.37MINVALCO INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 319.14WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 339.51 625.00MISSION CRITICAL CONCEPTS POLICE G & A TRAINING 625.00 165.00MN FALL MAINTENANCE EXPO PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 165.00 2,016.00MOBOTREXSYSTEM REPAIR OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 2,016.00 35.13MOON, TERRY WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 35.13 174.12MOORE, SANDRA REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 37 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 37Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 174.12 166.85MORK, LLOYD WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 166.85 321.00MORRELL BRANDON SOFTBALL PROGRAM REVENUE 321.00 16.72MORTGAGE & TITLE SERVICES LLC.WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 16.72 5,000.00MOVEFWDPOLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,000.00 95.08MOZEY, WILLIAM REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 95.08 487.50MOZQUEDA EDUARDO GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 487.50 312.50MPCASTREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 312.50 123.12MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 123.12 642.19MTI DISTRIBUTING CO GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 642.19 2,552.00MVTL LABORATORIES REILLY BUDGET OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,552.00 150.90MYERS TIRE SUPPLY CO GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES 150.90 1,707.63NAPA (GENUINE PARTS CO)GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 40.50WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT PARTS 347.11VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 2,095.24 112.86NATHANSON, BRIDGET ASSESSING G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 38 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 38Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 112.86 504.00NATIVE PLANT NURSERY INC BEAUTIFICATION / FLOWERS LANDSCAPING MATERIALS 504.00 775.00NATURAL REFLECTIONS VII LLC SSD 1 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 775.00SSD 2 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 775.00SSD 3 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,325.00 569.10ND CHILD SUPPORT DIVISION EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S WAGE GARNISHMENTS 569.10 1,800.00NDI TECHNOLOGIES INC POLICE G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 1,800.00 29.60NELSON, STEPH INACTIVE - YOUTH PRGMS PROGRAM REVENUE 29.60 11,750.00NEMERFIEGERCOMM & MARKETING G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 11,750.00 274.62NETWORK TITLE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 274.62 1,128.95NORDBY, MATTHEW OPERATIONS SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 1,128.95 41.80NORTH AMERICAN SAFETY INC PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 41.80 243.00NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 243.00 3,950.00-NORTHLAND CONCRETE & MASONRY COMPANY PARK IMPROVE BALANCE SHEET RETAINED PERCENTAGE 79,000.00PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 75,050.00 2,600.69NORTHLAND MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 2,600.69 City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 39 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 39Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 3,000.00NORTHLAND SECURITIES INC FINANCE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,000.00 25.00NORTHSTAR CHAPTER HEALTH IN THE PARK INITIATIVE SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 25.00 165.00NRPAORGANIZED REC G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 165.00 5,074.20NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMM & MARKETING G & A POSTAGE 16,616.31COMM & MARKETING G & A PRINTING & PUBLISHING 21,690.51 598.67OAK KNOLL ANIMAL HOSPITAL POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 598.67 153.87OAKS WHITNEY WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 153.87 36.21OAKWOOD PARTNERS WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 36.21 11.32OBERT, EVE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 11.32 50.43OFFICE DEPOT ADMINISTRATION G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 52.32ADMINISTRATION G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 156.44HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICE SUPPLIES 732.84COMM & MARKETING G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 21.99COMMUNITY OUTREACH G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 342.49FINANCE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 564.39POLICE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 94.07POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 53.88OPERATIONSOFFICE SUPPLIES 655.86INSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 95.41PUBLIC WORKS G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 81.40ORGANIZED REC G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 28.47ORGANIZED REC G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 94.48WESTWOOD G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 47.07VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A OFFICE SUPPLIES 15.97VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 40 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 40Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 3,087.51 1,805.00OFFICE TEAM COMM & MARKETING G & A SALARIES - TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES 1,805.00 74.23OLESEN JAMES WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 74.23 172.73OLOUGHLIN, RORY WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 172.73 9,415.00OLS RESTORATION INC PAINTING OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 9,415.00 51.67OLSEN CHAIN & CABLE CO INC SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 51.67 17.50OLSON PAUL WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 17.50 1,002.00OMAHA PAPER COMPANY INC REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,002.00 1,000.00OMAN, KRISTI ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 1,000.00 525.00OMNI CONTRACTING INC WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 525.00 424.00ON SITE SANITATION NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 53.00CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 104.00SOLID WASTE G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 8,997.13FIELD MAINT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 207.00ICE RENTAL NON-TAXABLE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 9,785.13 141.32OPPORTUNITY PARTNERS INC WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 141.32 86.98ORFIELD, LINDA CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 86.98 City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 41 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 41Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 5,995.00OUVERSON SEWER & WATER INC SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 5,995.00 116.22OXYGEN SERVICE COMPANY INC OPERATIONS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 116.22 1,819.25PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES INC REILLY BUDGET OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,819.25 449,976.03PARK CONSTRUCTION CO CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 449,976.03 138.76PARK TAVERN FABULOUS FRIDAYS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 138.76 14,530.00PARSONS ELECTRIC TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 14,530.00 350.00PATRIOT 2000 INC PATCHING-PERMANENT SMALL TOOLS 350.00WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT PARTS 700.00 487.50PATTERSON ALEXANDER GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 487.50 101.99PEITSO EDWARD WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 101.99 11.18PELTOLA, MAX POLICE G & A TRAVEL/MEETINGS 11.18 1,150.00PERNSTEINER CREATIVE GROUP INC COMM & MARKETING G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 409.00COMM & MARKETING G & A PRINTING & PUBLISHING 1,559.00 20,000.00PERSPECTIVES INC.PERSPECTIVES OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 20,000.00 32.32PETERS, YVETTE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 32.32 City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 42 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 42Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 6.00PETTY CASH POLICE G & A LICENSES 6.00 18.80PETTY CASH - WWNC ASSESSING BUDGET POSTAGE 141.94WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 9.18WESTWOOD G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 7.62SUMMER CAMP GENERAL SUPPLIES 177.54 3,395.32PFM ASSET MANAGEMENT CITY POOLED INVESTMENTS BANK CHARGES/CREDIT CD FEES 3,395.32 3,578.91PHILIP'S TREE CARE INC SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 357.00WEED CONTROL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,935.91 175.00PIERRE MARCIA SAINT GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 175.00 90.38PIERRET, LINDSEY WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 90.38 2,694.56POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 2,694.56 131.15POPP.COM INC PARK MAINTENANCE G & A TELEPHONE 131.15 10,000.00POSTMASTERRESIDENTIAL/BUSINESS COMMUNIC POSTAGE 10,000.00 182.03POTTER APARTMENTS LLC REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 182.03 591.64POWERPLAN OIB TREE MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 591.64 57.50PRACTICAL SYSTEMS INSPECTIONS G & A MECHANICAL 57.50 City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 43 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 43Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 152.00PRAIRIE ELECTRIC INSPECTIONS G & A ELECTRICAL 152.00 700.00PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 468.00INVASIVE PLANT MGMT/RESTORATIO LANDSCAPING MATERIALS 137.50INVASIVE PLANT MGMT/RESTORATIO OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,305.50 63.83PRANGE, DAVID WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 63.83 142.01PRECISE MRM LLC PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENT 142.01WATER UTILITY G&A MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENT 142.01SEWER UTILITY G&A MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENT 142.01STORM WATER UTILITY G&A MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENT 568.04 29.99PREMIUM WATERS INC OPERATIONS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 29.99 577.92PRIBBENOW, NICOLE COMM & MARKETING G & A TRAVEL/MEETINGS 577.92 120.00PRINTERS SERVICE INC ARENA MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 120.00 490.00PRO AUTO DETAILING VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 170.00PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 660.00 385.52PRO TITLE OF MN LLC WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 385.52 660.00PROGRESSIVE CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC WATER UTILITY G&A ENGINEERING SERVICES 660.00 360.00PROMO TECH MARKETING ERU OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 360.00 118.50PUMP & METER SERVICE BLDG/GROUNDS OPS & MAINT BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 591.03BLDG/GROUNDS OPS & MAINT BUILDING MTCE SERVICE City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 44 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 44Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 709.53 1,419.96Q3 CONTRACTING WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 7,066.20STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 8,486.16 4,096.00QUALITY FLOW SYSTEMS INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 4,096.00 119.39QUICKSILVER EXPRESS COURIER HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL SUPPLIES 85.62VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A POSTAGE 205.01 119,775.00R & R SPECIALTIES PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,939.00ARENA MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 625.00ARENA MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT PARTS 122,339.00 6,880.96-RACHEL CONTRACTING INC PARK IMPROVE BALANCE SHEET RETAINED PERCENTAGE 137,619.27PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 130,738.31 32,954.08RAINBOW TREECARE TREE MAINTENANCE CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 425.00BEAUTIFICATION / FLOWERS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 33,379.08 66.58RAJSOMBATH LILIYA WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 66.58 6,649.03RANDY'S SANITATION INC FACILITY OPERATIONS GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE 3,402.36REC CENTER BUILDING GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE 10,051.39 20.78RANTA, DAVID WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 20.78 400.00REACHTECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 400.00 200.00RED WING SHOE STORE WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 200.00 City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 45 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 45Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 448.65REGENCY OFFICE PRODUCTS LLC POLICE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 40.50POLICE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 489.15 13.15REGIS TITLE LLC WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 13.15 2,196.00REINDERS INC PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 2,196.00 176.04RICH, TED WATER UTILITY G&A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 176.04 99.82RICHMOND, JULIE REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 99.82 6,310.13RICOH USA INC IT G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 6,310.13 252.94RIGID HITCH INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 252.94 55.39RIORDAN, ERIN WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 55.39 45,255.04RJM CONSTRUCTION LLC PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 45,255.04 1,404.00RMR SERVICES WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,404.00 76.83ROBERSON, ERICA WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 76.83 142.56ROCKLER, JUDITH WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 142.56 2,881.50ROGERS, KYLE SOFTBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,881.50 City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 46 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 46Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 422.00ROLLER GARDEN FABULOUS FRIDAYS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 422.00 102.23ROSENBERG, SARA WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 102.23 38.98ROSENTHAL BRANDON WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 38.98 90.00ROTARY CLUB OF SLP POLICE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 156.00POLICE G & A TRAVEL/MEETINGS 246.00 25.37RP MANAGEMENT WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 25.37 14,195.27RSP ARCHITECTS LTD PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 14,195.27 1,291.41S & S WORLDWIDE INC PLAYGROUNDS GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,291.41 40.00S R MECHANICAL INSPECTIONS G & A MECHANICAL 40.00 24.92SAM'S CLUB POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 105.58NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 12.98OPERATIONSSEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 335.35PLAYGROUNDSGENERAL SUPPLIES 9.32FABULOUS FRIDAYS GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,986.43CONCESSIONSCONCESSION SUPPLIES 2,474.58 95.00SAURER, MARTI INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 95.00 6,644.00SAVATREETREE DISEASE PRIVATE CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 6,644.00 169.79SCAN AIR FILTER INC REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES 169.79 City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 47 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 47Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 262.10SCHAAKE COMPANY, AJ HUMAN RESOURCES RECOGNITION 262.10 165.55SCHAEFCO LLC WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 165.55 37.44SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO.INSTALLATION OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 67.86PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 11.84PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 67.86PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 185.00 31.66SCHLUETER JOSH WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 31.66 19,195.00SCHMITZ CONSTRUCTION CO LLC, J P WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 19,195.00 2,500.00SCHOCHOW CONSTRUCTION ESCROWS DEMO / BROOKSIDE TRAFFIC 2,500.00 74.52SCHOMER, KELLEY ASSESSING G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 74.52 1,603.87SEHESCROWSGENERAL 27,166.67STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,766.11STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 33,536.65 278.15SELDEN, MATTHEW WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 278.15 439.22SENSOURCEREC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES 439.22 43.41SHANEDLING ESTHER WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 43.41 92.43SHEETS, DAVID WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 92.43 City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 48 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 48Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 359.84SHERWIN WILLIAMS PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 359.84 1,141.60SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO PAINTING OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 1,141.60 658.00SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 658.00 489.17SHOREHAM APARTMENTS LLC WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 489.17 61.03SHRED-IT USA MINNEAPOLIS ADMINISTRATION G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 11.77FINANCE G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 63.26POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 12.65INSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 12.65ORGANIZED REC G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 161.36 80.00SHUE, HEATHER WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 80.00 205.21SIAS, THERESE REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 205.21 9,540.00SIGNATURE MECHANICAL INC PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 1,644.00AQUATIC PARK BUDGET MAINTENANCE 11,184.00 12,858.10SIR LINES-A-LOT PAINTING OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 12,858.10 109.39SKELLY, GABRIEL NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 109.39 8,000.00SLOBODYANYUK, SLAVA ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 2,500.00ESCROWSDEMO / BROOKSIDE TRAFFIC 10,500.00 1,471.04SLP FF ASSOC IAFF LOCAL #993 EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S CHECKING City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 49 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 49Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 1,471.04 102.00SMITH, PERRY SOFTBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 102.00 540.67SNYDER ELECTRIC PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 540.67 195.85SOASH, CHRISTOPHER WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 195.85 18,504.64SPACK CONSULTING ENGINEERING G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 14,065.31TRAFFIC CONTROL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,000.00STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 33,569.95 3,487.58SPRINTIT G & A DATACOMMUNICATIONS 7,167.95CELLPHONES, IPADS, ETC.OFFICE EQUIPMENT 10,655.53 353.16SPS COMPANIES INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 72.40WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 152.22REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES 577.78 5,736.00SQUARERIGGER SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 5,736.00 2,724.10SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC ESCROWS GENERAL 2,724.10 156,589.55ST LOUIS PARK CONV & VISITORS BUREAU CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU COST REIMBURSEMENT-CVB 156,589.55 100.00ST LOUIS PARK SUNRISE ROTARY COMM DEV PLANNING G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 100.00 95.00ST PAUL, CITY OF POLICE G & A TRAINING 95.00 23.91STANBERRY, PAULA WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 50 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 50Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 23.91 28.99STANO, THOMAS WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 28.99 679.44STATE FARM INSURANCE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 679.44 306.00STEARNS, DAVID SOFTBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 306.00 75.00STEEN SABRINA GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 75.00 78.25STEIN, JOLYON WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 78.25 45,000.00STEPCOMM DEV PLANNING G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 45,000.00 233.32STEVE LUCAS PHOTOGRAPHY OPERATIONS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 233.32 9,671.24STEVENS ENGINEERS INC PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 9,671.24 82.85STOLUSKY SHEILA REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 82.85 5,550.00STONE ARCH ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT HUMAN RESOURCES ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT 5,550.00 49.49STORRELL PARTNERSHIP WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 49.49 466.00STRAND MFG CO WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 466.00 57,848.75STREICHER'S GENERAL FUND G&A MISC EXPENSE 57,848.75 City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 51 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 51Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 3,453.75SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 3,453.75 43,598.96SUMMIT ENVIROSOLUTIONS INC REILLY BUDGET GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 43,598.96 57.30SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION OPERATIONS FIRE ALARM & SPRINKLER 57.30 50.59SUNDEEN, TAYLOR WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 50.59 250.00SUSA ONE-DAY SCHOOL WATER UTILITY G&A TRAINING 250.00 2,462.46SWEEN COMPANY, EA CONCESSIONS CONCESSION SUPPLIES 2,462.46 61.87SYMONS, VIRGINIA WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 61.87 541.96SYSCO-MINNESOTA INC REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES 2,256.92CONCESSIONSCONCESSION SUPPLIES 2,798.88 115.81TASKS UNLIMITED INC.WATER UTILITY BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 115.81 225.00TEA2GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 225.00 15.48TELELANGUAGE INC ADMINISTRATION G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 15.48 4,972.55TEMPLE DISPLAY LTD PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 4,972.55 184.64TENNANT SALES AND SERVICE CO.REC CENTER BUILDING EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 1,604.25GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 1,788.89 City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 52 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 52Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 390.24TERMINAL SUPPLY CO GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES 390.24 116.93TERMINIX INT REC CENTER BUILDING BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 116.93 22.38TERZICH, ADAM WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 22.38 60.00TEXA TONKA TAILORING OPERATIONS GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 60.00 11,633.57THE MUSICANT GROUP CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 11,633.57 142.11THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO PAINTING OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 142.11 548.00THE SIGN PRODUCERS FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,250.00PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,798.00 10,575.12-THELEN HEATING & ROOFING INC PARK IMPROVE BALANCE SHEET RETAINED PERCENTAGE 211,502.37PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 200,927.25 5.97THISTLE HOLDINGS, LLC.WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 5.97 765.00THOMPSON, JAMES SOFTBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 765.00 284.27THOMPSON, LINDSEY NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 284.27 99.82THOMS, SARA REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 99.82 263.25THOMSON REUTERS WEST PAYMENT CENTER POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 263.25 City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 53 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 53Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 500.00TIGER OAK PUBLICATIONS COMM & MARKETING G & A ADVERTISING 500.00 4,560.00-TIMBER SYSTEMS PARK IMPROVE BALANCE SHEET RETAINED PERCENTAGE 45,600.00PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 41,040.00 1,396.50TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL ADMINISTRATION G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,396.50 200.00TIMIAN GERALD WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 200.00 177.96TITLE NEXUS LLC WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 177.96 6,588.18TKDAWATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6,588.18 49.99TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY PATCHING-PERMANENT EQUIPMENT PARTS 271.50WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 106.51PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 428.00 1,600.00TOWERLIGHTSSD #6 G&A LANDSCAPING MATERIALS 1,600.00 24,500.00TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE INC PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 5,990.00MUNICIPAL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 1,100.00SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 31,590.00 97.30TRADEMARK TITLE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 97.30 215.00TRAFFIC CONTROL CORP RELAMPING OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 215.00 3,124.16TRANSPORT GRAPHICS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 3,124.16 City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 54 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 54Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 2,922.50TREE TRUST TREE DISEASE PRIVATE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 80.30WESTWOOD G & A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 2,500.00WESTWOOD G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,502.80 40.00TRI COUNTY WATER CONDITIONING INSPECTIONS G & A PLUMBING 40.00 218.62TRI STATE BOBCAT GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 218.62 75.00TRI-COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSOCIATION POLICE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 75.00 1.00TWEETEN, JOEL INSPECTIONS G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 50.00INSPECTIONS G & A ELECTRICAL 73.53REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 124.53 20.38TWIN CITIES HOME RENTAL WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 20.38 1,700.00TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 1,700.00 29.44TWIN CITY HARDWARE PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 29.44 350.00TWIN CITY SCALE CO INC SOLID WASTE G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 350.00 950.00TWIN CITY SIGN INSTALLATIONS SSD #6 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 950.00 6,501.35U + B ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN MUNICIPAL BLDG OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6,501.35 11,736.75UHL CO INC MUNICIPAL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 11,736.75 1,270.65ULINEREC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 55 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 55Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 2,675.75ARENA MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 349.18VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 4,295.58 101.05ULLMANN, JOHN REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 101.05 1,135.30UNIFORMS UNLIMITED (PD)POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 1,057.39SUPPORT SERVICES OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 1,006.83SUPERVISORYOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 6,109.61PATROLOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 51.50RESERVESOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 337.04COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 9,697.67 474.00UNITED WAY OF MINNEAPOLIS AREA EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S UNITED WAY 474.00 337.50UNO DOS TRES COMMUNICATIONS POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 337.50 35.17UPS STORE WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 21.79VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A POSTAGE 56.96 165.92USA BLUE BOOK WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER 165.92 69.50USI EDUCATION & GOVERNMENT SALES ORGANIZED REC G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 69.50 33.34VAN DEN EINDE, ANTHONY WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 33.34 80.87VAN DIEST, ANN REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 80.87 3.35VANDEREYK CLAIR WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 3.35 44.05VANHOY, LAURA WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 56 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 56Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 44.05 100.44VAUGHAN, JIM NATURAL RESOURCES G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 100.44 347.00-VEIT & CO PARK IMPROVE BALANCE SHEET RETAINED PERCENTAGE 6,940.00PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 6,593.00 598.93VEKER, DR S WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 598.93 60.00VERIFIED CREDENTIALS HUMAN RESOURCES RECRUITMENT 60.00 100.08VERIZON WIRELESS SEWER UTILITY G&A TELEPHONE 24,732.60CELLPHONES, IPADS, ETC.OFFICE EQUIPMENT 140.44CELLPHONES, IPADS, ETC.TELEPHONE 24,973.12 140.89VICE, JANICE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 140.89 789.50VOICE AND DATA NETWORKS TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 789.50 86.34VSM REALESTATE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 86.34 57.09WALTHER, SEAN GENERAL INFORMATION MEETING EXPENSE 57.09 40.00WARNER'S STELLIAN CO INSPECTIONS G & A MECHANICAL 40.00 1,430.75WARNING LITES OF MN INC FABRICATION OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 350.00CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 250.00UNINSURED LOSS G&A UNINSURED LOSS 2,030.75 1,849.76WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 57 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 57Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 4,562.24-SOLID WASTE G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 66,586.59SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE 33,084.31SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS RECYCLING SERVICE 37,854.85SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE 134,813.27 271.60WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE INC SSD #4 G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 266.20WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 537.80 44.64WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 44.64 153.21WAYTEKVEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 153.21 42.26WELLSWOOD GROUP LLC WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 42.26 136.08WEST, JASON ORGANIZED REC G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 136.08 904.00WESTMAN PLUMBING WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 904.00 293.76WESTWOOD HILLS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 293.76 167.34WHEELER HARDWARE FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 167.34 49.03WHIPPS, PHILLIP WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 49.03 30.41WHITE, PERRY WATER UTILITY G&A TRAINING 179.28WATER UTILITY G&A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 209.69 2,235.00WILLMAR WOOD PRODUCTS INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 2,235.00 City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 58 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2LOGIS400V 58Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 25.00WILS-ZETA ORGANIZED REC G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 25.00 2,318.17WINSUPPLY OF EDEN PRAIRIE DAMAGE REPAIR OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 2,318.17 24.66WIPF, BRIAN WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 24.66 50.58WITMER PUBLIC SAFETY GROUP INC OPERATIONS PROTECTIVE CLOTHING 50.58 1,803.04WOLFF, JOHN OPERATIONS SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 1,803.04 98.91WOLGEMUTH, KARLA & CRAIG REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 98.91 228.00WRAP CITY GRAPHICS NATURAL RESOURCES G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 228.00 53,272.39WSB ASSOC INC STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,460.50TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 54,732.89 165.72WW GRAINGER INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 463.05ROUTINE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT PARTS 501.26WATER UTILITY G&A SMALL TOOLS 1,130.03 17,700.00XCEL ENERGY FACILITIES MCTE G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE 24.30OPERATIONSEMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 23,438.03PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE 35,714.82WATER UTILITY G&A ELECTRIC SERVICE 1,840.86REILLY BUDGET ELECTRIC SERVICE 5,592.97STORM WATER UTILITY G&A ELECTRIC SERVICE 5,499.26PARK MAINTENANCE G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE 25.20BRICK HOUSE (1324)ELECTRIC SERVICE 94.15WW RENTAL HOUSE (1322)ELECTRIC SERVICE 701.34WESTWOOD G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE 17,941.82REC CENTER BUILDING ELECTRIC SERVICE City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 59 10/7/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:28R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 59Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/7/20168/27/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 108,572.75 29.16YAEGER, JOE AQUATIC PARK BUDGET MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 29.16 6,680.00YTS COMPANIES LLC PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT MAINTENAN OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 8,760.00TREE DISEASE PRIVATE CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 9,405.00TREE DISEASE PUBLIC CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 24,845.00 129.28ZANDER, LOIS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 129.28 916.00ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC SWEEPING EQUIPMENT PARTS 916.00 140,367.45ZIEGLER INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 140,367.45 133.97ZIP PRINTING WATER UTILITY G&A OFFICE SUPPLIES 133.97PARK MAINTENANCE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 267.94 32.44ZUMWALT, KRISTEN WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 32.44 Report Totals 5,792,620.81 City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 60 Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: October 17, 2016 Consent Agenda Item: 4g EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Accept Monetary Donation from the Estate of Alice Trainer RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution approving acceptance of a monetary donation from the Estate of Alice Trainer in the amount of $1,200 for improvements to Lamplighter Park via the Operations and Recreation Department and $1,200 to the Fire Department for use at their discretion. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish to accept the gift with restrictions on its use? SUMMARY: State statute requires City Council’s acceptance of donations. This requirement is necessary in order to make sure the City Council has knowledge of any restrictions placed on the use of each donation prior to it being expended. St. Louis Park resident Alice Trainer passed away and designated $1,200 for improvements to Lamplighter Park along with $1,200 to be used at the discretion of the Fire Department. These donations were given with the restriction that they be used for park improvements at Lamplighter Park ($1,200) and at the discretion of the Fire Department ($1,200). FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: These donations will be used for improvements at Lamplighter Park and at the discretion of the Fire Department. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution Prepared by: Stacy M. Voelker, Senior Office Assistant Sue Rasmussen, Office Assistant Reviewed by: Cynthia S. Walsh, Director of Operations & Recreation Steve Koering, Fire Chief Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4g) Page 2 Title: Accept Monetary Donation from the Estate of Alice Trainer RESOLUTION NO. 16-____ RESOLUTION APPROVING ACCEPTANCE OF DONATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,400 FOR THE OPERATIONS & RECREATION DEPARMENT AND THE FIRE DEPARTMENT WHEREAS, The City of St. Louis Park is required by State statute to authorize acceptance of any donations; and WHEREAS, the City Council must also ratify any restrictions placed on the donation by the donor; and WHEREAS, the estate of Alice Trainer donated $1,200 for improvements to Lamplighter Park along with $1,200 to be used at the discretion of the Fire Department; and NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park that the gift is hereby accepted with thanks to Alice Trainer with the understanding that $1,200 must be used for park improvements at Lamplighter Park and $1,200 to be used at the discretion of the Fire Department. Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council October 17, 2016 City Manager Mayor Attest: City Clerk Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: October 17, 2016 Consent Agenda Item: 4h EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Adoption of 2017 Utility Rates RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution setting the 2017 Utility Rates. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council desire to set the 2017 Utility Rates as proposed and previously discussed? SUMMARY: At the September 6, 2016 study session, staff presented the proposed utility rates to Council along with the Long-Range Financial Management Plan on these funds. City staff, in conjunction with consultants, analyzed the City’s utility operations and capital plans over the next 10 years to determine if rate adjustments are needed to maintain long-term sustainability in each of the four utility funds. Based on analyses from information in the CIP and the plan approved by Council, which is the continued phased-in increase to the fixed fee for the Water Fund as a means to reduce seasonal volatility, changes in utility rates are being recommended. The changes are consistent with information Council received in the past and are in line with the goals of achieving long-term sustainability in the funds and promoting a decrease in refuse. As previously reviewed, the 2017 residential solid waste rate structure includes the cost of organics and eliminating the $10 quarterly charge. Operations and Recreation staff will be communicating the changes to residents in the upcoming months. For 2017, the approximate cumulative effect on a typical residential property for all the utility rate adjustments would be an increase of $15.47, or 5.72% for the quarter, or approximately $5.16 per month. The calculation is based on a family of four using 30 units of water per quarter (22,500 gallons), and 60 gallon solid waste service. The recommended rates will be in place for consumption or services provided beginning on January 1, 2017. The attached resolution provides specific information on the recommended rate adjustments for each fund. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The utility rates will support necessary city services to be provided during 2017. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: 2017 Proposed Utility Rates - Impact on a Residential Property Resolution Prepared by: Patricia Sulander, Accountant Reviewed by: Tim Simon, Chief Financial Officer, Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4h) Page 2 Title: Adoption of 2017 Utility Rates CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK ESTIMATED QUARTERLY UTILITY BILL ACTUAL 2016 AND PROPOSED 2017 Household Size 4 Units per quarter 30 Solid Waste Service 60-gallon Meter size 3/4 inch Actual Proposed Dollar Percent Service Type 2016 2017 Change Change Water Per unit rate - Tier 1 $ 1.66 $ 1.78 $ 0.12 7.23% Service charge $ 22.35 $ 24.79 $ 2.44 10.92% State testing fee $ 1.59 $ 1.59 $ - 0.00% Consumption $ 49.80 $ 53.40 $ 3.60 7.23% Sewer Service charge $ 15.68 $ 16.78 $ 1.10 7.02% Per unit $ 3.07 $ 3.28 $ 0.21 6.84% Consumption $ 92.10 $ 98.40 $ 6.30 6.84% Storm Drainage Service charge $ 21.30 $ 21.83 $ 0.53 2.49% Bassett Creek Fee* $ 1.93 $ 1.93 $ - 0.00% Solid Waste (includes tax)** $ 67.50 $ 69.00 $ 1.50 2.22% Total Bill without Bassett* $ 270.32 $ 285.79 $ 15.47 5.72% Increase per quarter (dollars) $ 15.47 Increase per month (dollars) $ 5.16 * Since not all property owners would be charged this fee, it is not included in the dollar or percentage change in total bill. **In 2017, the solid waste charge for residential includes organics. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4h) Page 3 Title: Adoption of 2017 Utility Rates RESOLUTION NO. 16-____ RESOLUTION SETTING UTILITY RATES WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota has received a report through the Chief Financial Officer related to proposed utility rates; and WHEREAS, it is necessary for the city to maintain charges in an amount necessary to cover the cost of providing service to users; and WHEREAS, maintaining rates through regular adjustment is a recommended practice rather than large intermittent increases; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, MN, that: 1. The water rates as recommended are hereby adopted. Description Units of Usage* Adopted Rate Tier1 0 - 40 units (0-30,000 gallons) 1.78 Tier 2 41-80 units (30,001 – 60,000 gallons) 2.21 Tier 3 >80 units (>60,000 gallons) 3.31 Commercial All units 1.78 Irrigation All units 3.31 *1 unit equals 100 cubic feet or 750 gallons 2. The water meter charges recommended are hereby adopted. Residential/Multi-family Quarterly Fee Commercial Monthly Fee Meter Size 2017 2017 5/8" $ 24.79 $ 8.26 3/4" $ 24.79 $ 8.26 1" $ 34.71 $ 11.57 1.5" $ 44.62 $ 14.87 2" $ 71.89 $ 23.96 3" $ 272.69 $ 90.90 4" $ 347.06 $ 115.69 6" $ 520.59 $ 173.53 2" compound $ 71.89 n/a 3" compound $ 272.69 n/a 3. The Minnesota Department of Health state testing for water quality will continue to be imposed at a rate of $1.59 per quarter for residential and multi-family and $0.53 per month for commercial accounts. 4. The sanitary sewer usage rate recommended is hereby adopted at $3.28 per unit. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4h) Page 4 Title: Adoption of 2017 Utility Rates 5. The sanitary sewer base charge recommended is hereby adopted at $16.78 per quarter for residential and multi-family accounts and $5.60 per month for commercial accounts. 6. The storm sewer rate recommended is hereby adopted at $21.83 per quarter per residential equivalent unit or $36.38 per month per residential equivalent unit for commercial accounts. 7. The Bassett Creek Watershed Management Charge pass through for properties located within the Bassett Creek Watershed Management District will be $1.93 per quarter per residential equivalent unit or $0.64 per month per residential equivalent unit. 8. The solid waste service charges per quarter recommended are hereby adopted. Service Level In Gallons Rates – without tax 20 $ 26.64 30 $ 44.23 60 $ 65.64 90 $ 100.59 120 $ 159.81 150 $ 199.76 180 $ 239.72 270 $ 359.57 360 $ 479.43 450 $ 599.29 540 $ 719.15 Note: For those that subscribe to the Organics program it is included in the rate structure above. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council October 17, 2016 City Manager Mayor Attest: City Clerk Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: October 17, 2016 Consent Agenda Item: 4i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Walker/Lake Street Hennepin County-Moving the Market Grant Award RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to adopt a Resolution authorizing the execution of a grant agreement with Hennepin County for a Moving the Market grant to be used in the Walker/Lake Street area. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the Council support the use of grant funds to be used to reactivate the Walker-Lake Street business area? SUMMARY: In October 2015, the city applied for a Business District Initiative (BDI) grant from Hennepin County with the intent of using the funds to make improvements to the Walker-Lake Street business area. The city did not receive the grant, however, since that time staff has had continual discussions with Hennepin County regarding other potential funding sources to be used at Walker/Lake given its location near both the Louisiana Ave and Wooddale Ave LRT stations. This past summer, Hennepin Count y offered to provide the city a Moving the Market grant, in the amount of $35,000. Hennepin County received these grant funds from the McKnight Foundation. The Moving the Market program was designed to support and enhance employment and business development in and around the Southwest Light Rail Transit station areas. Once formally awarded, these funds will be used on measures to reactivate the Walker/Lake business area. Specifically, funds will be allocated to create an activation plan, develop branding, and install wayfinding. The Hennepin County Board is scheduled to formally approve this grant on November 15, 2016. The city has been asked to provide an executed grant agreement before that date; the agreement is attached. At the October 24th City Council Study Session, staff will present a report outlining the various Walker-Lake initiatives currently in progress, including a summary of the Walk & Talk open street event and more details on this grant. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: There are no matching requirements for the Moving the Market Grant. Hennepin County’s grant goals of improving opportunities for local business growth will be met through the city funded open streets event, the city’s planned area wide future capital improvements including upgrades to Walker Street, and access improvements to the nearby station areas. VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged community. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion Resolution Authorizing Execution of Grant Agreement Moving the Market Grant Participation Agreement Prepared by: Julie Grove, Economic Development Specialist Reviewed by: Greg Hunt, Economic Development Coordinator Michele Schnitker, Housing Supervisor/Deputy Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4i) Page 2 Title: Walker/Lake Street Hennepin County-Moving the Market Grant Award DISCUSSION BACKGROUND: Last fall, the city unsuccessfully applied for a Hennepin County Business District Initiative/BDI Grant for the Walker/Lake street area. While there were insufficient grant funds to award to all applicants, Hennepin County did like the city’s proposed project. To that end, city and county staff met on several occasions to determine if there were other funding mechanisms that could be used for the Walker/Lake Street area. Late this summer Hennepin County offered the city a Moving the Market Grant of $35,000. This grant program was awarded to Hennepin County in 2014 from the McKnight Foundation and is designed to support and enhance employment and business development near the Southwest Light Rail Transit station areas. Specifically, the grant activities include the following: Activation Plan: The city will contract with The Musicant Group to write an activation plan that will provide the city and business area with easy to implement steps designed to generate more activity in the Walker Lake business area. The activation plan will provide a place-based analysis of the area, make strategic recommendations on enhancing the area, and provide a prioritized list of actionable improvements, systems and activities that would enliven the area. Brand development: In order to promote the business area, the city will hire a consultant to work with the city and local businesses to develop a brand platform or style guide for the area. This branding will be used in wayfinding and placemaking elements such as signs, lighting, benches, bike racks, etc., and marketing. Implementation: The city will install permanent placemaking/wayfinding elements to spur reinvestment, attract new businesses and broaden the customer base for local businesses. The intent is to direct people to this less visible, underutilized commercial destination. Some of the placemaking and wayfinding elements could include directional signage, identification signs, banners, benches, or lights. With each of the grant activities staff will continue to collaborate with the businesses, property owners, school and community members in the Walker Lake Street area to ensure that their needs, wants and ideas are incorporated into each component. As an older business center, the Walker/Lake Street area has transitioned through a wide variety of commercial uses, and is now poised to raise its profile and become a more dynamic and important center of activity. The intent is not to entirely change the area, rather to further enhance its visibility, activity and value so as to raise its profile in the community. NEXT STEPS: During the Study Session on October 24th staff will present an update on all of the activities taking place or planned for the Walker Lake Business Area. This will include a summary of the Open Street Event-Walk & Talk that was held on October 8th, more details on the Moving the Market Grant activities, and plans for continued engagement with the area stakeholders. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4i) Page 3 Title: Walker/Lake Street Hennepin County-Moving the Market Grant Award RESOLUTION NO. 16-___ RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A GRANT AGREEMENT WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY FOR A MOVING THE MARKET GRANT WHEREAS, Hennepin County has offered the City of St. Louis Park grant funds through the Moving the Market Grant Program established by the McKnight Foundation to be used along the Walker Lake Street business area; WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park intends to utilize the grant funds to reactivate the Walker Lake Street business area; WHEREAS, the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners is scheduled to approve the City of St. Louis Park’s grant funds on November 1, 2016; WHEREAS, it is necessary for the City of St. Louis Park to enter into a grant agreement with the Hennepin County as a part of receiving said grant funds; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, that the Mayor and City Manager are authorized to execute the grant agreement with Hennepin County. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council October 17, 2016 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Hennepin County Contract No. A 166331 COST PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT FOR ST. LOUIS PARK MOVING THE MARKET WALKER LAKE BUSINESS AREA PROGRAM This Agreement made and entered into by and between the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, a public body corporate and politic (“COUNTY”), A-2300 Government Center, Minneapolis, MN 55487, and the City of St. Louis Park, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“CITY”), 5005 Minnetonka Boulevard, St. Louis Park, MN 55416. WHEREAS, the COUNTY established the Southwest LRT Community Works program in December 2009 (Resolution 09-0596) to maximize the benefits and opportunities that will come along with the investment being made in the Southwest Light Rail Transit (LRT) Project; and WHEREAS the CITY has been a member of Southwest LRT Community Works since its beginning, participating on the Steering Committee, in numerous staff committees and workgroups, and has contributed staff time and funding to support Southwest LRT Community Works goals; and WHEREAS, in March 2014, the COUNTY approved Agreement # A132405 accepting grant funding from the McKnight Foundation for a Moving the Market program, in collaboration with Neighborhood Development Center (NDC) and Metropolitan Economic Development Association (MEDA), designed to support and enhance employment and business development in and around Southwest LRT station areas; and WHEREAS, McKnight Foundation’s Moving the Market also seeks to expand minority-owned mid-market businesses, promoting sustainable business growth and development along the Southwest LRT line, increasing transit ridership and increasing efficient and sustainable regional metropolitan development, creating livable communities and expanding development; and WHEREAS, through the Moving the Market program, the CITY has identified an opportunity to enhance a local business area in the Walker Street and West Lake Street area, near the planned Wooddale and Louisiana Southwest LRT stations; and WHEREAS, the CITY is proposing to reenergize business area in the Walker/Lake area, an existing business node of historic significance as a part of St. Louis Park’s original main street; and WHEREAS, the CITY aims to preserve affordable commercial space in close proximity to schools, the St. Louis Park High School stadium, a community center and residential homes, in an area at risk of potential gentrification, and to improve area identification, wayfinding, bike and pedestrian facilities in the area; and WHEREAS, the CITY and the St. Louis Park School District plan to make additional investments in the Walker Street and West Lake Street area, including facility upgrades, new bike lanes or trails, and lighting, wayfinding signage, public art and bike parking improvements; and City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4i) Title: Walker/Lake Street Hennepin County-Moving the Market Grant Award Page 4 WHEREAS, the CITY will also provide branding and logo development services to the business area, as a means to support the growth and expansion of existing businesses and attract new businesses to the area; and WHEREAS, the COUNTY’s specific investment would provide funding for the creation of an activation plan, creating a branding and marketing plan and wayfinding improvements, including lighting, signage, and public art as components of the CITY’S business area renewal project; and WHEREAS, the COUNTY has funding available through its Moving the Market grant allocation to support the Project; and WHEREAS, these activities meet the goals of the Moving the Market grant and Southwest LRT Community Works by partnering with cities and the private sector to support existing businesses, help them to prepare for Southwest LRT by improving the pedestrian realm in and around station areas, and create additional opportunities for business growth and expansion near transit lines; and WHEREAS, the COUNTY has the authority to contribute to the Project pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §§ 383B.79 and 471.64; and WHEREAS, the parties are authorized to enter into this Agreement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §§ 383B.79 and 471.59. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: 1. Amount and Eligible Activities. The COUNTY will provide $35,000 to the CITY to fund an activation plan, branding and wayfinding capital improvements to promote the Walker Lake Business Area in accordance with the Eligible Activities attached as Attachment A and incorporated by this reference. This funding will be provided from the COUNTY’s Moving the Market grant funds. 2. Term. The term of this Agreement is from November 15, 2016 through December 31, 2017. 3. Reporting. The CITY agrees to provide quarterly reports to the COUNTY on the expenditure of grant funds, progress of capital improvements and any other information the COUNTY requests to satisfy grant reporting requirements to McKnight Foundation or the COUNTY. Quarterly reports shall include the following deliverables: a. Summary of technical assistance provided including businesses served, specific services provided and measurable outcomes. b. Copy of the Activation Plan and Branding Platform further described in Attachment A. c. Summary of placemaking and wayfinding elements installed, ordered or planned, including photos of previous conditions and completed work as well as itemized costs. d. Summary of additional capital improvements to the business district, including those planned, underway and completed. e. Other business district program reporting requirements as requested by Hennepin County or the McKnight Foundation. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4i) Title: Walker/Lake Street Hennepin County-Moving the Market Grant Award Page 5 4. Payment for Eligible Activities. Payment for costs incurred on Eligible Activities shall be made directly to the CITY upon the presentation of a claim in the manner provided by law governing the COUNTY’S payment of claims and/or invoices. The CITY shall submit invoices for services on forms which may be furnished by the COUNTY. Payment shall be made within forty-five (45) days from receipt of the invoice. 5. Unexpended funds. Any unexpended funds at the end of the term of this Agreement shall be returned to the COUNTY, unless an extension to the term has been approved by both parties. 6. Independent Contractor. The CITY will be responsible for management of the Project in its entirety. The CITY shall select the means, method, and manner of performing the services herein. Nothing is intended or should be construed in any manner as creating or establishing the relationship of a partnership or joint venture between the parties hereto or as constituting the CITY as the agent, representative, or employee of the COUNTY for any purpose or in any manner whatsoever. The CITY is to be and shall remain an independent contractor with respect to all services performed under this Agreement. The CITY represents that it has or will secure at its own expense all personnel required in performing services under this Agreement. Any and all personnel of the CITY or other persons while engaged in the performance of any work or services required by the CITY under this Agreement shall have no contractual relationship with the COUNTY, and shall not be considered employees of the COUNTY. Any and all claims that may or might arise under the Minnesota Unemployment Insurance Law or the Workers’ Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of said personnel, arising out of employment or alleged employment, including, without limitation, claims of discrimination against the CITY, its officers, agents, contractors, or employees shall in no way be the responsibility of the COUNTY. The CITY shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the COUNTY, its officials, officers, agents, volunteers, and employees from any and all such claims irrespective of any determination of any pertinent tribunal, agency, board, commission, or court. Such personnel or other persons shall neither require nor be entitled to any compensation, rights, or benefits of any kind whatsoever from the COUNTY, including, without limitation, tenure rights, medical and hospital care, sick and vacation leave, Workers’ Compensation, Unemployment Insurance, disability, severance pay, and retirement benefits. 7. Data Privacy. The CITY, its officers, agents, owners, partners, employees, volunteers and subcontractors agree to abide by the provisions of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, and all other applicable state and federal laws, rules, regulations and orders relating to data privacy or confidentiality, and as any of the same may be amended. 8. Records – Availability/Access. Subject to the requirements of Minnesota Statutes Section 16C.05, Subd. 5 (as may be amended), the CITY agrees that the County, the State Auditor, the Legislative Auditor or any of their duly authorized representatives, at any time during normal business hours, and as often as they may reasonably deem necessary, shall have access to and City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4i) Title: Walker/Lake Street Hennepin County-Moving the Market Grant Award Page 6 the right to examine, audit, excerpt, and transcribe any books, documents, papers, records, etc., which are pertinent to the accounting practices and procedures of the CITY and involve transactions relating to this Agreement. Such materials shall be maintained and such access and rights shall be in force and effect during the period of the contract and for six (6) years after its termination or cancellation. 9. Merger and Modification. a. It is understood and agreed that the entire Agreement between the parties is contained herein and that this Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. All items referred to in this Agreement are incorporated or attached and are deemed to be part of this Agreement. b. Any alterations, variations, modifications, or waivers of provisions of this Agreement shall only be valid when they have been reduced to writing as an amendment to this Agreement signed by the parties hereto. 10. Default and Cancellation. a. If the CITY fails to perform any of the provisions of this Agreement or so fails to administer the work as to endanger the performance of the Agreement, this shall constitute a default. Unless the CITY’s default is excused by the COUNTY, the COUNTY may upon written notice immediately cancel this Agreement in its entirety. Additionally, failure to comply with the terms of this Agreement shall be just cause for the COUNTY for delaying payment until the CITY’s compliance. b. The COUNTY’s failure to insist upon strict performance of any provision or to exercise any right under this Agreement shall not be deemed a relinquishment or waiver of the same, unless consented to in writing. Such consent shall not constitute a general waiver or relinquishment throughout the entire term of the Agreement. 11. Contract Administration. Kerri Pearce Ruch, Principal Planning Analyst, or her successor, shall manage this Agreement on behalf of the COUNTY. Julie Grove, Economic Development Specialist, or her successor, shall manage this Agreement on behalf of the CITY 12. Notices. Any notice or demand which must be given or made by a part hereto under the terms of this Agreement or any statute or ordinance shall be in writing and shall be sent registered or certified mail. Notices to the COUNTY shall be sent to the County Administrator at the address given in the opening paragraph of the Agreement. Notices to the CITY shall be sent to the address stated in the opening paragraph of this Agreement. REMAINDER OF PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4i) Title: Walker/Lake Street Hennepin County-Moving the Market Grant Award Page 7 COUNTY BOARD APPROVAL CITY, having signed this Agreement, and the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners having duly approved this Agreement on the ____ day of ___________, 2016 and pursuant to such approval, the proper County officials having signed this Agreement, the parties hereto agree to be bound by the provisions herein set forth. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ATTEST: By:________________________________ By: ________________________________ Deputy/Clerk of the County Board Chair of its County Board Date: ________________________ Date: ________________________ APPROVED AS TO FORM: And: ________________________________ County Administrator By:________________________________ Date: ________________________ Assistant County Attorney Date: ________________________ And: ________________________________ Assistant County Administrator, Public Works Date: ________________________ City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4i) Title: Walker/Lake Street Hennepin County-Moving the Market Grant Award Page 8 APPROVED AS TO EXECUTION: RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL By:________________________________ By: ________________________________ Assistant County Attorney Director, Department of Date: ________________________ Community Works Date: ________________________ CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK By: ________________________________ Its: Mayor Date: ______________________________ By: ________________________________ Its: City Manager Date: _______________________________ City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4i) Title: Walker/Lake Street Hennepin County-Moving the Market Grant Award Page 9 1 Attachment A St. Louis Park Walker Lake Business Area Program ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES 1. Activation Plan The City will contract with The Musicant Group to write an activation plan that will provide the City and business area with easy to implement steps designed to generate more activity in the Walker Lake business area. The activation plan will provide a place-based analysis of the area, make strategic recommendations on enhancing the area, and provide a prioritized list of actionable improvements, systems and activities that would enliven the area. Costs associated with the Activation Plan are further described in The Musicant Group Activation Plan Proposal (Attachment B). Eligible expenses for this activity shall not exceed $10,000. 2. Brand development In order to promote the business area, the City will hire a consultant to work with the City and local businesses to develop a brand platform or style guide for the business area. This branding will be used in wayfinding and placemaking elements such as signs, lighting, benches, bike racks, etc., and marketing for the area. Eligible expenses for this activity shall not exceed $15,000. 3. Implementation The City will install permanent placemaking/wayfinding elements to spur reinvestment, attract new businesses and broaden the customer base for local businesses. The intent is to direct people to this hidden, underutilized commercial destination. Some of the placemaking and wayfinding elements would include directional signage, identification signs, banners, benches, lights, etc. Eligible expenses for this activity shall not exceed $10,000 The COUNTY may approved modifications to the not-to-exceed amounts for the Eligible Activities listed above in its sole discretion, provided the total amount of the Eligible Activities shall not exceed the total contract amount of $35,000. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4i) Title: Walker/Lake Street Hennepin County-Moving the Market Grant Award Page 10 The Musicant Group – Creating Places Where People Want to Be – www.musicantgroup.com Optional Service: Activation Plan that Leverages the Successful Event(s) The Musicant Group has created a number of Activation Plans that provide communities with easy to implement steps to generate more positive activity in a given district. These plans often correspond with demonstration and/or pilot events – with the events informing and giving momentum to the plan and the draft plan guiding what goes into the event. The Musicant Group crafts activation plans for commercial and residential districts in order to enhance their commercial and community vitalities. The activation plans use a placemaking approach to enliven each district via: ¥ An enhanced user and visitor experience that increases visitation and the length of stay of visitors ¥ Enhances the social environment of each district ¥ The creation and/or enhancement of existing destination experiences that lure visitors to the district Leveraging The Musicant Group’s placemaking and operational expertise, the activations plans: ¥ Provide a place-‐based analysis of each district ¥ Make strategic recommendations on enhancing strengths and fixing weaknesses ¥ Provide a prioritized list of actionable improvements, systems, and activities that each main street community could implement relatively quickly The activation plans are rooted in The Musicant Group’s holistic and interdisciplinary approach that combines design, stewardship, activities and events informed by user engagement, communications, and data driven evaluation. As such, the plan will include analysis, budget estimates and prioritized recommendations for: ¥ Permanent physical and design elements ¥ Movable installations ¥ Furniture and fixtures ¥ Communications, branding and marketing ¥ Wayfinding ¥ Management procedures and systems ¥ Events and programming ¥ Landscaping ¥ Lighting ¥ Merchandising ¥ Pedestrian and car pathways ¥ Rules and regulations Fee $10,000 per district City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4i) Title: Walker/Lake Street Hennepin County-Moving the Market Grant Award Page 11 Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: October 17, 2016 Consent Agenda Item: 4j EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Contract with HealthPartners for Health Insurance for 2017 and 2018 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Approve the HealthPartners contract for health insurance for 2017 and 2018. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish to approve the two year contract with HealthPartners to provide health insurance for benefit-earning city employees for 2017-2018? SUMMARY: The City has offered health insurance benefits to our employees via HealthPartners (HP) since 2012. Overall, we are pleased with the programs, products, and services provided by HealthPartners. The City requested a renewal quote from HP, including a request for a multi-year agreement, and HP has responded with a favorable two year proposal. For 2017, HP has proposed an aggregate increase to premiums of 4.82%. For 2018, HP has proposed a 9% increase to premiums. Human Resources staff and our benefits consultant have reviewed the proposal and are very pleased. The rate increases are lower than anticipated. Because the two-year agreement has a value over $100,000, Council must approve the contract with HealthPartners. Upon Council approval, staff will begin preparation for annual benefits open enrollment, including a recommendation for the employer contribution, which will be presented to Council for approval on November 7, 2016. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Increased employer contribution for 2017 has been included in budget planning. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Not applicable. Prepared by: Ali Timpone, HR Coordinator Reviewed by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: October 17, 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Final Payment Resolution - Sanitary Sewer Lining – Project No. 4016-3000 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution accepting work and authorizing final payment in the amount of $7,590.43 for Project 4016-3000 Sanitary Sewer Lining with Michels Corporation, City Contract No. 42-16. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Not applicable SUMMARY: On March 21, 2016, the City Council awarded a contract to Michels Corporation, Inc. This contract consisted of relining 900 feet of the sanitary sewer forcemain on Park Center Boulevard. The work for this contract was finished this summer, and the contractor has requested final payment. The Contractor completed this work according to approved plans and specifications. The final contract cost, $151,808.60, is 12.5% more than the final contract amount of $134,891.00. The contract increase was due to the discovery of a joint in the pipe, not accounted for in the original plans that had to be excavated and removed. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The final contract cost for the work performed under Contract No. 49-14 has been calculated as follows: Original Contract Price (based on estimated quantities) $134,891.00 Additional Work +$19,325.00 Final Contract Amount $154,216.00 Actual Amount Due (based on actual quantities) $151,808.60 Previous Payments -$144,218.17 Balance Due $7,590.43 This project was included in the City’s adopted 2016 capital budget. The work was funded by Sanitary Sewer funds. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution Prepared by: Phillip Elkin, Sr. Engineering Project Manager Reviewed by: Debra Heiser, Engineering Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Consent Agenda Item: 4k City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Page 2 Title: Final Payment Resolution - Sanitary Sewer Lining – Project No. 4016-3000 RESOLUTION NO. 16-____ RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING FINAL PAYMENT AND ACCEPTING THE WORK ON 2016 SANITARY SEWER LINING CITY PROJECT NO. 4016-3000 CONTRACT NO. 42-16 NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Pursuant to a written contract with the City dated March 21, 2016, Michels Corporation, Inc. has satisfactorily completed Project 4016-3000 Sanitary Sewer Lining. 2. The Engineering Director has filed her recommendations for final acceptance of the work. 3. The work completed under this contract is accepted and approved. The final contract cost is $151,808.60. 4. The City Manager is directed to make final payment in the amount of $7,590.43 on the contract, taking the contractor's receipt in full. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council October 17, 2016 City Manager Mayor Attest: City Clerk Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: October 17, 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Bid Tabulation: Award Bid for Concrete Replacement – Project No. 4017-0003 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to award bid for Concrete Replacement– Project No. 4017-0003. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish to continue the City’s practice of repairing or replacing existing sidewalk, curb and gutter, and catch basins? SUMMARY: Bids were received on October 10, 2016 for miscellaneous concrete repair, including sidewalk, curb and gutter, and storm sewer catch basins at various locations in the city. This annual construction contract addresses needed concrete repairs in the pavement management area scheduled for sealcoat the following year as well as sidewalk trip hazards throughout the City. This contract was a consolidation of work identified in Pavement Management Areas, 2, 3 and 5 (Project Nos. 4016-0003 and 4017-0003). Only one (1) bid was received for this project. A summary of the bid results is as follows: CONTRACTOR BID AMOUNT Concrete Idea, Inc. $367,950.00 Engineer’s Estimate $411,800.00 A review of the bid indicates Concrete Idea, Inc. submitted the lowest responsible bid. Concrete Idea, Inc. is a reputable contractor that has worked for the City before. Staff recommends that a contract be awarded to the firm in the amount of $367,950.00. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: This project was planned for and included in the City’s adopted Capital Improvement Program as project number 4016-0003 and 4017-0003, with an estimated budget of $502,750.00 for construction and engineering. Based on the low bid received the total construction cost for the project including engineering is $393,706.50 which is well within the budget identified for this project. This project is funded by the Public Works Operations budget, Stormwater Utility, and Pavement Management funds. Funding details are provided in the discussion section. VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged community. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion Prepared by: Phillip Elkin, Senior Engineering Project Manager Reviewed by: Debra Heiser, Engineering Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Consent Agenda Item: 4l City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4l) Page 2 Title: Bid Tabulation: Award Bid for Concrete Replacement– Project No. 4017-0003 DISCUSSION BACKGROUND: On June 6, 2016, the City Council rejected the bids for Concrete Replacement- Project No. 4016-0003. This was recommended because the bid received was $100,000 over the engineer’s estimate. The majority of the work identified as a part of the 4016-0003 contract was rolled into this contract for the 4017-0003 project. However there were a number of safety repairs (tripping hazards) on sidewalks that were addressed this year. This work was contracted through direct quotes since it was under $100,000. Cost of the work completed this year was $72,500 and funded through the Public Works Operations budget. Bids were received on October 10, 2016 for miscellaneous concrete repair, including sidewalk, curb and gutter, and storm sewer catch basins at various locations in the city. This annual construction contract addresses needed concrete repairs in the pavement management area scheduled for sealcoat the following year as well as sidewalk trip hazards throughout the City. Staff annually surveys the condition of sidewalks to identify hazards for repair. Panels of sidewalk that are cracked or have been lifted by tree roots to create trip hazards that need to be removed and replaced are included in this contract. Curb and gutter with similar defects that create drainage or safety problems are also repaired. Deteriorating catch basins that are within the work area wil l also be repaired or rebuilt. An advertisement for bids was published in the St. Louis Park Sun-Sailor on September 15, 2016. In addition, plans and specifications are noticed on the City Website and are made available electronically via the internet by our vendor Quest CDN.com. Thirteen contractors/vendors purchased plan sets including one Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE) and one Veterans Preferred business. Funding Details Based on the low bid received, cost and funding details are revised as follows: Expenditures Construction Cost (proposed contract) $ 367,950.00 Engineering & Administration (7%) $ 25,756.50 Total $ 393,706.50 Revenues PW Operations Funds $ 95,000.00 Pavement Management Funds (4016-0003 & 4017-0003) $ 255,478.50 Stormwater Utility Funds $ 43,228.00 Total $ 393,706.50 Construction Timeline: Work held over from Project No. 4016-0003 in Pavement Management Areas 2 & 3, will be completed by Friday, June 30, 2017. The work in Pavement Management Area 5, except maintenance work, will be completed by Friday, October 27, 2017. Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: October 17, 2016 Consent Agenda Item: 4m EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Temporary On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License – Minnesota Cycling Center RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Approve a Temporary On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for Minnesota Cycling Center at Aquila Park, 3110 Xylon Avenue So., for November 5, 2016. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the applicant meet the requirements for the issuance of a temporary liquor license? BACKGROUND: Minnesota Cycling Center has made application for a Temporary On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for Fulton Star Cross 2016, which is a 2-day bicycle racing event at Aquila Park, with Saturday night and Sunday races. Saturday’s race is free for spectators and will include a beer garden, featuring Fulton Beer served from 5:30-8:30 p.m. The applicant worked with Ops & Rec regarding the details of the event, including obtaining the necessary approvals from the city Fire and Police Departments. The Minnesota Cycling Center is a learning, racing and entertainment destination for cyclists and fans of all ages. It is a multi-purpose entity providing community cycling programs, after-school STEM education curriculum, and a home for events of all types. Minnesota Cycling Center has been using Aquila Park for cycling events in the past. This is the first event for which they have requested a temporary liquor license. The Police Department has completed the background investigation on the principals of the Minnesota Cycling Center and has found no reason to deny the temporary license. The applicant has met all requirements for issuance of the license, and staff is recommending approval. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The fee for a temporary liquor license is $100 per day of the event. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not Applicable. Attachments: None Prepared by: Kay Midura, Office Assistant – City Clerk’s Office Reviewed by: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: October 17, 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Environmental Response Fund Grant Application for Carpenter Park Regional Stormwater Improvement RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution to approve the application for an Environmental Response Fund (ERF) Grant from Hennepin County for the Carpenter Park Regional Stormwater Improvement. POLICY CONSIDERATION: None SUMMARY: At the September 26, 2016 study session, staff presented the results of a feasibility study on a regional stormwater treatment facility to be located in Carpenter Park. The proposed project was found to be feasible; it will provide stormwater treatment to 42 acres and remove 30 pounds of phosphorus loading in the Bass Lake Preserve watershed. In addition, this project would benefit both the redevelopment of the Beltline Station Area and the new skateboard park proposed at Carpenter Park. Council indicated that staff should continue to proceed with this project. A limited phase II environmental study was conducted which found that there are contaminated materials buried in the park which would need to be removed to construct this project. While this material is not hazardous, it will need to be disposed of in a landfill. To address these costs, staff recommends applying for an ERF grant to pay for the removal costs. The ERF program provides funds for the assessment and cleanup of contaminated sites. ERF grants provide funding for a variety of activities at contaminated sites where the added environmental costs hinder site improvements or redevelopment. Staff is requesting that Council approve the attached resolution of support to apply for and receive the ERF Grant. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The engineer’s estimate for this project is $1,164,700. The project is proposed to be paid using Storm Water Utility Funds. Passing this resolution will enable the City to apply for ERF grant funds to fund $170,000 of contaminated material removal. If received these dollars will offset the overall cost of this project. VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a leader in environmental stewardship. We will increase environmental consciousness and responsibility in all areas of city business. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution Prepared by: Phillip Elkin, Senior Engineering Project Manager Reviewed by: Debra Heiser, Engineering Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Consent Agenda Item: 4n City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4n) Page 2 Title: Environmental Response Fund Grant Application for Carpenter Park Regional Stormwater Improvement RESOLUTION NO. 16-____ RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE APPLICATION AND TO RECEIVE ERF FUNDING FROM HENNEPIN COUNTY FOR THE REMOVAL OF CONTAMINATED SOILS IN THE CARPENTER PARK REGIONAL STORMWATER TREATMENT PROJECT BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Saint Louis Park approves the application for funding for the Carpenter Park Regional Stormwater Treatment Project, for which an Environmental Response Fund grant application is being submitted to the Hennepin County Department of Environmental Services on November 1st of 2016, by the City of Saint Louis Park. I certify that the above resolution was adopted by the City Council on ______________. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council October 17, 2016 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: October 17, 2016 Consent Agenda Item: 4o EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Special Assessment – Water Service Line Repair at 2901 Vernon Avenue South RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution authorizing the special assessment for the repair of the water service line at 2901 Vernon Avenue South, St. Louis Park, MN P.I.D. 31-029-24-33-0010. POLICY CONSIDERATION: The proposed action is consistent with policy previously established by the City Council. SUMMARY: Daniel Gladen, owner of the single family residence at 2901 Vernon Avenue South, has requested the City to authorize the repair of the water service line for his home and assess the cost against the property in accordance with the City’s special assessment policy. This is a repair that was made between the home and the curb box and is not impacted by the City’s new waterline ownership policy. Homeowners are still responsible for water lines repairs that occur between their home and the curb box located in the right of way. The City requires the repair of service lines to promote the general public health, safety and welfare within the community. The special assessment policy for the repair or replacement of water or sewer service lines for existing homes was adopted by the City Council in 1996. This program was put into place because sometimes property owners face financial hardships when emergency repairs like this are unexpectedly required. Plans and permits for this service line repair work were completed, submitted, and approved by City staff. The property owner hired a contractor and repaired the water service line in compliance with current codes and regulations. Based on the completed work, this repair qualifies for the City’s special assessment program. The property owner has petitioned the City to authorize the water service line repair and special assess the cost of the repair. The total eligible cost of the repair has been determined to be $4,950.00. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The City has funds in place to finance the cost of this special assessment. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution Prepared by: Jay Hall, Utility Superintendent Reviewed by: Mark Hanson, Public Works Superintendent Patricia A. Sulander, Accountant Tim Simon, Chief Financial Officer Cindy Walsh, Director of Operations and Recreation Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4o) Page 2 Title: Special Assessment – Water Service Line Repair at 2901 Vernon Avenue South RESOLUTION NO. 16-____ RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE REPAIR OF THE WATER SERVICE LINE AT 2901 VERNON AVENUE SOUTH, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN P.I.D. 31-029-24-33-0010 WHEREAS, the Property Owner at 2901 Vernon Avenue South, has petitioned the City of St. Louis Park to authorize a special assessment for the repair of the water service line for the single family residence located at 2901 Vernon Avenue South; and WHEREAS, the Property Owner has agreed to waive the right to a public hearing, right of notice and right of appeal pursuant to Minnesota Statute, Chapter 429; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park has received a report from the Utility Superintendent related to the repair of the water service line. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, that: 1. The petition from the Property Owner requesting the approval and special assessment for the water service line repair is hereby accepted. 2. The water service line repair that was done in conformance with the plans and specifications approved by the Public Works Department and Department of Inspections is hereby accepted. 3. The total cost for the repair of the water service line is accepted at $4,950.00. 4. The Property Owner has agreed to waive the right to a public hearing, notice and appeal from the special assessment; whether provided by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, or by other statutes, or by ordinance, City Charter, the constitution, or common law. 5. The Property Owner has agreed to pay the City for the total cost of the above improvements through a special assessment over a ten (10) year period at the interest rate of 4.00%. 6. The Property Owner has executed an agreement with the City and all other documents necessary to implement the repair of the water service line and the special assessment of all costs associated therewith. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council October 17, 2016 City Manager Mayor Attest: City Clerk Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: October 17, 2016 Consent Agenda Item: 4p EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Assignment and Subordination Agreement – ACSLP, LLC (TPI Hospitality/AC Hotel by Marriott) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution approving the Assignment and Subordination Agreement with ACSLP, LLC (TPI Hospitality) and Johnson Bank relative to the Amended and Restated Contract for Private Redevelopment with Central Park West, LLC. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the EDA find that the proposed Assignment and Subordination Agreement with TPI Hospitality and its lender, Johnson Bank, is in conformance with the Amended and Restated Contract for Private Redevelopment with Central Park West, LLC and to be in the best interest of the city and its residents? SUMMARY: On April 4, 2016, ACSLP, LLC (TPI Hospitality) received its final zoning approvals for the hotel (AC Hotel by Marriott) required under the Amended and Restated Contract for Private Redevelopment with Central Park West, LLC. As a requirement of the construction financing for the project, TPI Hospitality’s lender, Johnson Bank, has requested that the EDA and City approve an Assignment and Subordination Agreement of Amended and Restated Contract for Private Redevelopment. The proposed Assignment and Subordination is primarily an agreement by the EDA and City to subordinate their rights under the Contract to the rights of Johnson Bank under TPI Hospitality’s construction loan. The developer is also collaterally assigning its rights under the Contract to Johnson Bank. This does not mean that the lender has any of the rights or obligations under the Contract, rather that the lender will have those rights if the hotel developer commits an event of default under the Loan Agreement (see paragraph 3 of the Assignment and Subordination). There are two provisions of particular note within the proposed Agreement: Paragraph 7 provides that although the City and EDA have waived the required date for commencement of construction of the hotel, they reserve the right to require a 4th Amendment to the Contract if construction is delayed past January 1, 2017. Paragraph 9 provides that the rights of the EDA under the Assessment Agreement for the hotel are NOT subordinated to the Mortgage. The proposed Agreement is similar to other subordination agreements the EDA has approved previously. The proposed Agreement has been reviewed by the EDA’s legal counsel who recommends its approval. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: None VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion Resolution of Approval Assignment and Subordination Prepared by: Greg Hunt, Economic Development Coordinator Reviewed by: Michele Schnitker, Housing Supervisor/Deputy Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, EDA Executive Director and City Manager City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4p) Page 2 Title: Assignment and Subordination Agreement – ACSLP, LLC (TPI Hospitality/AC Hotel by Marriott) DISCUSSION BACKGROUND: The hotel required within the Central Park West redevelopment (specifically Phase III of the Third Amendment to the Amended and Restated Contract for Private Redevelopment with Central Park West, LLC and assigned to RISLP, LLC and subsequently renamed ACSLP, LLC (TPI Hospitality) received its final zoning approvals on April 4, 2016. The developer, TPI Hospitality, has subsequently been refining the building’s interior design with the hotel franchise, AC Hotel by Marriott, and securing the project’s construction financing. TPI Hospitality has informed staff that it expects to close on its financing with Johnson Bank by the end of October and commence construction shortly thereafter. The project is expected to be completed by February 2018 which is approximately 6 months later than the required completion date specified in the Redevelopment Contract. Paragraph 7 within the proposed Assignment and Subordination Agreement provides that although the City and EDA have waived the required date for commencement of construction of the hotel, they reserve the right to require a 4th Amendment to the Contract if construction is delayed past January 1, 2017. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4p) Page 3 Title: Assignment and Subordination Agreement – ACSLP, LLC (TPI Hospitality/AC Hotel by Marriott) CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK RESOLUTION NO. 16-____ RESOLUTION APPROVING AN ASSIGNMENT AND SUBORDINATION OF AMENDED AND RESTATED CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE REDEVELOPMENT BETWEEN THE CITY, THE ST. LOUIS PARK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, ACSLP, LLC, AND JOHNSON BANK BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council ("Council") of the City of St. Louis Park ("City") as follows: Section 1. Recitals. 1.01. The St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority (the “Authority”) currently administers Redevelopment Project No. 1 ("Project") within the City, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047 ("HRA Act"), and within the Project has established the West End Tax Increment Financing District (“TIF District”). 1.02. The City, Authority and ACSLP, LLC (the “Redeveloper,” as Assignee pursuant to an Assignment and Assumption of Redevelopment Contract dated May 8, 2015) are parties to that Amended and Restated Contract for Private Redevelopment dated as of May 17, 2010, as amended by a First Amendment to Amended and Restated Contract for Private Redevelopment dated as of November 21, 2011, a Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Contract for Private Redevelopment dated as of May 8, 2015, and a Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Contract for Private Redevelopment dated as of May 2, 2016 (as so amended, the “Contract”). Pursuant to the Contract, the Redeveloper is obligated to construct a hotel (“CPW Phase III”) on certain property within the TIF District (the “Redevelopment Property”). 1.03. The Redeveloper proposes to enter into a loan agreement with Johnson Bank (the “Lender”) for certain mortgage financing related to CPW Phase III to be constructed on the Redevelopment Property, and has requested that the City and Authority approve an Assignment and Subordination of Contract for Private Redevelopment (the “Assignment”) as authorized pursuant to Section 7.2 of the Contract. 1.04. The Council has reviewed the Assignment and finds that the approval and execution of the Assignment are in the best interest of the City and its residents. Section 2. City Approval; Other Proceedings. 2.01. The Assignment as presented to the Council is hereby in all respects approved, subject to modifications that do not alter the substance of the transaction and that are approved by the Mayor and City Manager, provided that execution of the Assignment by such officials shall be conclusive evidence of approval. 2.02. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute on behalf of the City the Assignment and any other documents requiring execution by the City in order to carry out the transaction described in the Assignment. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4p) Page 4 Title: Assignment and Subordination Agreement – ACSLP, LLC (TPI Hospitality/AC Hotel by Marriott) 2.03. City staff and consultants are authorized to take any actions necessary to carry out the intent of this resolution. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council October 17, 2016 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4p) Page 5 Title: Assignment and Subordination Agreement – ACSLP, LLC (TPI Hospitality/AC Hotel by Marriott) ASSIGNMENT AND SUBORDINATION OF AMENDED AND RESTATED CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE REDEVELOPMENT THIS ASSIGNMENT AND SUBORDINATION OF AMENDED AND RESTATED CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE REDEVELOPMENT (this “Agreement”), is made and entered into as of the 17th day of October, 2016, by and among the CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the “City”); ST. LOUIS PARK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, a public body corporate and politic organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the “Authority”); ACSLP, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (the “Redeveloper”), and JOHNSON BANK, a Wisconsin banking corporation (the “Lender”). W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, the City, Authority and the Redeveloper (as Assignee pursuant to an Assignment and Assumption of Redevelopment Contract dated May 8, 2015 and recorded in the office of the Registrar of Titles of Hennepin County, Minnesota as Document No. T05254079) are parties to that Amended and Restated Contract for Private Redevelopment dated as of May 17, 2010 and filed as Document No. 4781478, as amended by a First Amendment to Amended and Restated Contract for Private Redevelopment dated as of November 21, 2011 and filed as Document No. 4913709, a Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Contract for Private Redevelopment dated as of May 8, 2015 and filed as Document No. 5254066, and a Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Contract for Private Redevelopment dated as of May 2, 2016 and filed as Document No. 5354383, and as the same may be further amended or modified from time to time (the “Development Contract”); WHEREAS, all capitalized terms used herein, unless otherwise defined herein, shall have the meanings given them in the Development Contract; and WHEREAS, the Development Contract contemplates certain development of the Redevelopment Property which is to include the construction of Central Park West Phase III of certain Minimum Improvements, consisting of a 120-150 room hotel (the “Hotel Phase”) on the real property located in St. Louis Park, Minnesota, legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof (the “Hotel Parcel”); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of that certain Loan Agreement dated __________ ____, 2016 by and between the Lender and Redeveloper (the “Loan Agreement”), the Lender has agreed to make a $19,250,000 construction loan (the “Loan”) to the Redeveloper; and City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4p) Page 6 Title: Assignment and Subordination Agreement – ACSLP, LLC (TPI Hospitality/AC Hotel by Marriott) WHEREAS, the Redeveloper has executed in favor of Lender that certain Promissory Note dated ______________ ____, 2016 in the original principal amount of $19,250,000 (the “Note”), evidencing the original principal amount of the Loan; and WHEREAS, the Note is secured by that certain Construction Mortgage, Security Agreement, Assignment of Rents and Leases and Fixture Financing Statement encumbering the Mixed-Use Project dated _________ ___, 2016 (the “Mortgage”), executed by the Redeveloper in favor of the Lender and filed of record in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota on ______________ as Document No. _____________, and in the office of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota, on ______________ as Document No. _______________; and WHEREAS, the Lender has required, as an express condition to extending the Loan to Redeveloper pursuant to the Loan Agreement, (a) that the Redeveloper assign to the Lender its rights under the Development Contract with regard to the Hotel Phase to secure the obligations of the Redeveloper to the Lender under the Loan, (b) that the Development Contract be subordinated to the Mortgage, and (c) that the Authority agree to certain other matters, all as more fully contained herein. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows: 1. The Redeveloper hereby assigns to the Lender all of its right, title and interest under and pursuant to the Development Contract as to the Hotel Phase only (the “Hotel Rights”) to secure the Redeveloper’s obligations under the Loan. 2. The Redeveloper hereby represents and warrants to the Lender that Redeveloper has made no prior assignments of the Development Contract, that the Development Contract is a valid enforceable agreement and that none of the Redeveloper, the City, nor the Authority is in default thereunder and that all covenants, conditions and agreements have been performed as required therein, except those not to be performed until after the date hereof. The Redeveloper hereby agrees not to sell, assign, pledge, mortgage or otherwise transfer or encumber its interest in the Hotel Phase Rights as long as this Agreement is in effect. The Redeveloper hereby irrevocably constitutes and appoints the Lender as its attorney-in-fact to demand, receive and enforce the Redeveloper’s rights with respect to the Hotel Phase Rights for and on behalf of and in the name of the Redeveloper or, at the option of the Lender, in the name of the Lender, with the same force and effect as the Redeveloper could do if this Agreement had not been made. 3. This Agreement shall constitute a perfected, absolute and present assignment, provided that Lender shall have no right under this Agreement to enforce the provisions of the Development Contract with regard to the Hotel Phase Rights or exercise any rights or remedies under this Agreement until an Event of Default (as that term is defined in the Loan Agreement) shall occur and be continuing. 4. Upon the occurrence of an Event of Default, the Lender may, without affecting any of its rights or remedies against the Redeveloper under any other instrument, document or agreement, exercise its rights under this Agreement as the Redeveloper’s attorney-in-fact in any manner permitted by law and in addition the Lender shall have the right to exercise City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4p) Page 7 Title: Assignment and Subordination Agreement – ACSLP, LLC (TPI Hospitality/AC Hotel by Marriott) and enforce any and all rights and remedies available after a default to a secured party under the Uniform Commercial Code as adopted in the State of Minnesota. If notice to the Redeveloper of any intended disposition of collateral or of any intended action is required by law in any particular instance, such notice shall be commercially reasonable if given in writing at least ten (10) days prior to the intended disposition or other action. 5. The City and Authority hereby consent and agree to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. The City and Authority further represent to the Lender that the Development Contract is a valid agreement enforceable in accordance with its terms and that none of the City, the Authority or the Redeveloper is in default thereunder and that all covenants, conditions and agreements have been performed as required therein, except those not to be performed until after the date hereof. 6. The Authority hereby acknowledges and agrees that the Authority has received from the Redeveloper the Construction Plans for the Hotel Phase and has approved such Construction Plans for all purposes of the Development Contract as required by Section 4.2 of the Development Contract. 7. The City and Authority hereby acknowledge and agree that the requirement in Section 4.3(a) of the Development Contract regarding commencement of construction of the Hotel Phase has been waived by the City and Authority as of the date hereof based on continued good-faith progress by the Redeveloper toward commencement of construction of the Hotel Phase. The City and Authority further agree to work with the Redeveloper in good faith to negotiate and execute an amendment to the Development Contract, providing for extended commencement and completion dates of the Hotel Phase, in the event that commencement of construction of the Hotel Phase is delayed beyond January 1, 2017. 8. The City and Authority hereby acknowledge and agree that the Mortgage and the Loan Agreement have been approved by the City and Authority and that the defined term “Mortgage” as set forth in Section 1.1 of the Development Contract shall hereinafter include the Mortgage and any and all amendments, supplements, modifications, renewals, extensions or replacements thereto, thereof or therefor. 9. The City and Authority hereby expressly agree and acknowledge that the Development Contract, including, without limitation, all terms, conditions, provisions and obligations set forth therein, is subject to and subordinate to the lien of the Mortgage, but solely with respect to the Hotel Phase; provided, however, that pursuant to Section 7.2(a)(iii), the rights of the Authority as to the Assessment Agreement for the Hotel Phase shall not be subordinated. 10. Pursuant to Section 5.2 of the Development Contract, the Authority acknowledges that the rights of the Authority with respect to the receipt and application of any proceeds of insurance awards with respect to the Hotel Phase shall, in all respects, be subject and subordinate to the rights of the Lender under the Mortgage. 11. The Authority hereby agrees to provide the Lender with copies of any notice of default given under the Development Contract, and that the Lender shall have the right, but not the obligation, to cure any such default on behalf of the Redeveloper within the time period specified in the Development Contract. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4p) Page 8 Title: Assignment and Subordination Agreement – ACSLP, LLC (TPI Hospitality/AC Hotel by Marriott) 12. Pursuant to Section 7.2(a)(ii) of the Development Contract, the Lender hereby agrees to provide the Authority with copies of any notice of default given to the Redeveloper under the Loan Agreement, and that the Authority shall have the right, but not the obligation, to cure any such default on behalf of the Redeveloper within such cure periods as are available to the Redeveloper as provided in the Loan Agreement and Mortgage. 13. The parties hereto hereby agree that no change or amendment having a material adverse effect on the Hotel Phase shall be made to any terms of the Development Contract without the prior written consent of the Lender. 14. This Agreement can be waived, modified, amended, terminated or discharged only explicitly in a writing signed by all parties hereto. A waiver by the Lender shall be effective only in a specific instance and for the specific purpose given. Mere delay or failure to act shall not preclude the exercise or enforcement of any of the Lender’s rights or remedies hereunder. All rights and remedies of the Lender shall be cumulative and shall be exercised singularly or concurrently, at the Lender’s option, and any exercise or enforcement of any one such right or remedy shall neither be a condition to nor bar the exercise or enforcement of any other. 15. No provision of this Agreement shall be deemed or construed to alter, amend or modify, in any way, the rights and obligations of the City or Authority contained in the Development Contract. 16. The City, the Authority and the Redeveloper acknowledge that the Lender is not a party to the Development Contract, and the Lender shall not, by executing this Agreement or by exercising its rights and remedies hereunder or under the Mortgage or the Loan Agreement, incur any obligations of any kind or otherwise be or become liable to the City, Authority or anyone, whether under the Development Contract or otherwise; nor shall the City or Authority, by executing this Agreement, incur any obligations of any kind or otherwise be or become liable to the Redeveloper or the Lender or anyone, whether under the Mortgage, the Loan Agreement or otherwise. 17. The City and Authority hereby represent to the Lender that the making, execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement by the City and Authority have been authorized by all necessary action of the City and Authority, and that this Agreement is the valid and binding obligation of the City and Authority, enforceable against the City and Authority and their successors and assigns in accordance with its terms. 18. Any notices, communications and waivers under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be (a) delivered in person, (b) mailed, postage prepaid, either by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, or (c) by overnight express carrier, addressed in each case as follows: To Lender: Johnson Bank 100 South Fifth Street, Suite 1210 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Attention: Michael Fitzpatrick City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4p) Page 9 Title: Assignment and Subordination Agreement – ACSLP, LLC (TPI Hospitality/AC Hotel by Marriott) To Redeveloper: ACSLP, LLC 103 15th Avenue NW Suite 200 Willmar, Minnesota 56201 Attention: ______________ To City: City of St. Louis Park 5005 Minnetonka Boulevard St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 Attention: City Manager To Authority: St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority 5005 Minnetonka Boulevard St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 Attention: Executive Director or to any other address as to any of the parties hereto, as such party shall designate in a written notice to the other party hereto. All notices sent pursuant to the terms of this Paragraph shall be deemed received (i) if personally delivered, then on the date of delivery, (ii) if sent by overnight, express carrier, then on the next federal banking day immediately following the day sent, or (iii) if sent by registered or certified mail, then on the earlier of the third federal banking day following the day sent or when actually received. 19. This Agreement shall be binding upon the City, the Authority, the Redeveloper and the Lender and their respective successors and assigns and shall inure to the benefit of and may be enforced by the Lender and its successors and assigns, including the purchaser in any foreclosure sale or the transferee in any transfer in lieu of foreclosure of the Hotel Phase. 20. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. 21. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts and by the different parties hereto on separate counterparts and each such counterpart shall be deemed to be an original, but all such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same Agreement. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4p) Page 10 Title: Assignment and Subordination Agreement – ACSLP, LLC (TPI Hospitality/AC Hotel by Marriott) IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have made and entered into this Agreement as of the day and year first above written. CITY: CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK, a Minnesota municipal corporation By: Its: Mayor By: Its: City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of October, 2016, by Jake Spano and Thomas Harmening, the Mayor and City Manager, respectively, of the CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation. Notary Public City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4p) Page 11 Title: Assignment and Subordination Agreement – ACSLP, LLC (TPI Hospitality/AC Hotel by Marriott) AUTHORITY: ST. LOUIS PARK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, a public body corporate and politic organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota By: Its: President By: Its: Executive Director STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of October, 2016, by Anne Mavity and Thomas Harmening, the President and Executive Director, respectively, of the ST. LOUIS PARK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, a public body corporate and politic organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota, on behalf of the Authority. Notary Public City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4p) Page 12 Title: Assignment and Subordination Agreement – ACSLP, LLC (TPI Hospitality/AC Hotel by Marriott) REDEVELOPER: ACSLP, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company By: Name: Its: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF ___________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ______ day of ____________, 2016, by __________________, the ______________________ of ACSLP, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, for and on behalf of such limited liability company. ______________________________ Notary Public City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4p) Page 13 Title: Assignment and Subordination Agreement – ACSLP, LLC (TPI Hospitality/AC Hotel by Marriott) LENDER: JOHNSON BANK, a Wisconsin banking corporation By: ______________________________ Name: Its: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF ___________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of ___________________, 2016, by ___________________________, the ________________________ of JOHNSON BANK, a Wisconsin bankingcCorporation, for and on behalf of such corporation. ______________________________ Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY: Kennedy & Graven, Chartered (MNI) 200 South Sixth Street, Suite 470 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 (612) 337-9300 City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4p) Page 14 Title: Assignment and Subordination Agreement – ACSLP, LLC (TPI Hospitality/AC Hotel by Marriott) EXHIBIT A Legal Description of Hotel Parcel The real property situated in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described as follows: Lot 3, Block 1, Central Park West P.U.D. No. 121 Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: October 17, 2016 Consent Agenda Item: 4q EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Order Feasibility Report for Gorham Parking Lot Reconstruction - Project No. 4017- 1600 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution authorizing the preparation of a feasibility report for the Gorham Parking Lot Reconstruction Project. POLICY CONSIDERARTION: This action is consistent with the Council’s recently updated assessment policy for parking lots owned by the city and used by private property owners. SUMMARY: Staff is requesting that the Council order the preparation of a feasibility report for the reconstruction of the Gorham parking lot located at 3301 Gorham Avenue. This parking lot was originally constructed by the City in 1964. The primary use of this lot is private property parking. Annual and seasonal maintenance are performed by Operations. Since this project is proposed to be specially assessed to benefitting property owners, we need to follow the State Statute 429 process. The first step in this process is to have the City Council order the preparation of a Feasibility Report. To develop this project, staff will work with surrounding property owners. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The total estimated cost for this project, including engineering and administration, is $315,000. It is proposed that the cost of this project be financed using special assessments. In addition the City Council has requested that staff explore potential annual assessment of operation and maintenance costs VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged community. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion Resolution Location Map Prepared by: Phillip Elkin, Sr. Engineering Project Manager Reviewed by: Debra Heiser, Engineering Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4q) Page 2 Title: Order Feasibility Report for Gorham Parking Lot Reconstruction - Project No. 4017-1600 DISCUSSION BACKGROUND: The city owns and operates 10 municipal parking lots. These lots are located throughout the City and are not adjacent to City buildings. All of these parking lots are in need of reconstruction. Staff has added these lots to the 10 year Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The first lot proposed for reconstruction is the Gorham parking lot located at 3301 Gorham Avenue. The City’s policy for reconstruction of these lots is to assess 100% of the cost to the benefitting property owners. Some additional background: 1. The Gorham parking lot was constructed in 1964. 2. The cost to construct this lot was paid for through assessments to adjacent property owners as shown on the attached location map. This is for reference only, the feasibility report will establish an updated list of benefiting properties and assessment rates. 3. There is no formal agreement between the property owners and the City for the use of this lot to meet code parking requirements. However, when there is a change in tenant or land use at one of the properties that were originally assessed for lot construction, zoning staff will credit that property the number of stalls for which they paid an assessment. 4. The pavement condition for this lot is poor and in need of reconstruction. The Feasibility Report will include the following: 1. Discussion of the need for the parking lot Perform a parking study to determine which of the surrounding properties have customers or employees that are using the lot. Determine if the surrounding properties have adequate private parking. This will be done through a land use review and associated City Code parking ratios requirements. Assign parking stalls to properties to meet the City Code parking requirements. This information will be used to establish the number of parking stalls needed in a reconstructed parking lot. 2. Preliminary design for the parking lot that meets City code and watershed district requirements. 3. A cost estimate for the project. 4. A preliminary assessment roll Using the parking studies and cost estimate, calculate the per stall assessment rate. Discussion of potential annual assessment of operation and maintenance costs. Throughout the process, staff will meet with surrounding property owners, both commercial and residential, to discuss the project and need for the parking lot. This information will be incorporated into the Feasibility Report and inform the design of the parking lot. Staff has identified the following schedule to proceed with this proposed lot reconstruction: Council orders Feasibility Report. October 17, 2016 Hold public meetings to discuss the project and assessments. Winter 2016/ 2017 Council accepts Feasibility Report and schedules Public Hearing February 2017 Public Hearing March 2017 City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4q) Page 3 Title: Order Feasibility Report for Gorham Parking Lot Reconstruction - Project No. 4017-1600 RESOLUTION NO. 16-____ RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR GORHAM PARKING LOT RECONSTRUCTION CITY PROJECT NO. 4017-1600 WHEREAS, the Council has reviewed the condition of the Gorham Parking lot located at 3301 Gorham Ave; and WHEREAS, it is proposed to improve the parking lot and to assess the benefited properties for all of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, as follows: That the proposed improvement, called Project No. 4017-1600 Gorham Parking Lot Reconstruction for study and that the Engineering Director is instructed to report to the council with all convenient speed, advising the council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible; whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement; the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended; and a description of the methodology used to calculate individual assessments for affected parcels Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council October 17, 2016 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk O A K L E A F D R WALKER ST WALKER ST ID A H O A V E SR E P U B L I C A V E 1ST ST NWLI B R A R Y L N GORHAMAVEB R O W N L O W A V ELOUISIANAAVESLOUISIANAAVES LOUISIANAAVES2ND ST NW 3260 3261 6714 3384 3381 3356 3355 7020 67267008 3361 3374 3330 3378 3370 3366 3362 3375 3340 33873363 3451 3370 33583325 6425 6425 3313 3340 3355 3305 3312 3328 3339 3337 33613357 3362 3333 33293320 3371 3361 3351 3358 3354 3280 3300 3401 3334 3343 3324 3300 3350 3320 3316 3340 3301 3312 3313 3337 3333 3312 3351 3500 3304 3338 3325 3321 3345 33303317 3341 3308 3304 3317 3337 3340 3326 3383 3379 3354 3343 3350 3309 3305 3286 3318 3301 3329 33053278 3336 3321 33323300 3313 3326 3346 3366 3297 3328 3338 3347 3346 3333 3308 3309 33163282 3322 3325 3324 3320 3501 7201 0 75 150 225 300Feet Municipal Parking Lots Legend Municipal Parking Lots Assessed Parcels Parcels City Limits ± Gorham Lot 3340 Gorham Ave. (17) 3360 Gorham Ave. (5) 3359 Gorham Ave. (2) 3304 Gorham Ave. (9) Assessed Parcels(Including Number of Spaces) 3316 Gorham Ave. (18) 3336 Gorham Ave. (24) 3359-61 Republic Ave. (6) 3305-25 Republic Ave. (6) City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4q) Title: Order Feasibility Report for Gorham Parking Lot Reconstruction - Project No. 4017-1600 Page 4 Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: October 17, 2016 Consent Agenda Item: 4r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Roitenberg Family Assisted Living Residence Private Activity Revenue Bond Refinancing RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution calling a public hearing regarding the issuance of revenue bonds for the benefit of Sholom Community Alliance, LLC. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Is the City Council willing to refinance Roitenberg Family Assisted Living Residence Revenue Bonds, Series 2006 for Sholom Community Alliance, LLC in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $12,500,000? SUMMARY: The City issued prior bonds (Series 2006) to refinance the acquisition, development, construction, and equipping of a seventy-six (76) unit multifamily housing development for the benefit of Sholom Community Alliance (the “Company”), located at 3610 Phillips Parkway. This development is operated as an assisted living and memory care facility for seniors (the “Project”). The Project is owned and operated by the Company and was designed and is used for rental occupancy, primarily by elderly persons. Nursing, medical, personal care, and other health-related assisted living services are available on a twenty-four (24) hour basis to residents of the Project. The Company has proposed to refinance the Project through the redemption and prepayment of the Prior Bonds and is requesting that the City issue its revenue bonds, in one or more series, as taxable or tax-exempt obligations (the “Bonds”), in an estimated aggregate principal amount not to exceed $12,500,000, in order to (i) refinance the Project through the redemption and prepayment of the outstanding Prior Bonds; (ii) fund any required reserves; and (iii) pay costs of issuance of the Bonds. NEXT STEPS: The public hearing and final approval is scheduled for November 21st, 2016. The bonds would close later this year. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Per the City’s private activity revenue bond policy Sholom Community Alliance, LLC will pay an annual administration fee in the amount of 1/8th of 1% (.125%) of the outstanding principal of the bonds. The City has no liability regarding repayment of these bonds. The estimate for admin fee remaining to be paid on the 2006 Bonds is just over $200,000, and the refinanced bonds will pay approximately $302,000 to the housing rehab fund. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution Kennedy & Graven Summary Letter Issuer Fee Comparison Prepared by: Coty Hemann, Accountant I Reviewed by: Tim Simon, Chief Financial Officer Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4r) Page 2 Title: Roitenberg Family Assisted Living Residence Private Activity Revenue Bond Refinancing CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 16-____ RESOLUTION CALLING A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THE ISSUANCE OF REVENUE BONDS FOR THE BENEFIT OF SHOLOM COMMUNITY ALLIANCE, LLC BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the “City Council”) of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota (the “City”), as follows: Section 1. Recitals. 1.01. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, as amended (the “Act”), the City is authorized to carry out the public purposes described in the Act by providing for the issuance of revenue bonds to provide funds to finance or refinance multifamily housing developments (including nursing and assisted living facilities). 1.02. On August 10, 2006, the City issued its Revenue Refunding Bonds (Roitenberg Family Assisted Living Residence Project), Series 2006 (the “Prior Bonds”), pursuant to the Act, in the original aggregate principal amount of $12,300,000, and loaned the proceeds thereof to Sholom Community Alliance, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Company”), whose sole member is Sholom Community Alliance, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation, for the purpose of refunding the following obligations of the City: (i) the Revenue Bonds (Roitenberg Family Assisted Living Residence Project), Series 2001A (the “Series 2001A Bonds”), issued in the original aggregate principal amount of $10,000,000; (ii) the Revenue Bonds (Roitenberg Family Assisted Living Residence Project), Series 2001B, Extendable Rate Adjustable Securities (EXTRAS) (the “Series 2001B Bonds”), issued in the original aggregate principal amount of $1,800,000; and (iii) the Revenue Bonds (Roitenberg Family Assisted Living Residence Project), Series 2001C, Extendable Rate Adjustable Securities (EXTRAS) (the “Series 2001C Bonds,” and collectively with the Series 2001A Bonds and the Series 2001B Bonds, the “Series 2001 Bonds”), issued in the original aggregate principal amount of $3,200,000. 1.03. The Company applied the proceeds of the Series 2001 Bonds to finance the acquisition, development, construction, and equipping of a seventy-six (76) unit multifamily housing development located at 3610 Phillips Parkway in the City, operated as an assisted living and memory care facility for seniors (the “Project”). The Project is owned and operated by the Company and was designed and is used for rental occupancy, primarily by elderly persons. Nursing, medical, personal care, and other health-related assisted living services are available on a twenty-four (24) hour basis to residents of the Project. 1.04. The Company has proposed to refinance the Project through the redemption and prepayment of the Prior Bonds and is requesting that the City issue its revenue bonds, in one or more series, as taxable or tax-exempt obligations (the “Bonds”), in an estimated aggregate principal amount not to exceed $12,500,000, in order to (i) refinance the Project through the redemption and prepayment of the outstanding Prior Bonds; (ii) fund any required reserves; and (iii) pay costs of issuance of the Bonds. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4r) Page 3 Title: Roitenberg Family Assisted Living Residence Private Activity Revenue Bond Refinancing 1.05. The Company has requested that the City Council conduct a public hearing on Monday, November 21, 2016, to provide approval of the issuance of the Bonds pursuant to the requirements of the Act and Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and the regulations promulgated thereunder. Section 2. Preliminary Findings. Based on representations made by the Company to the City to date, the City Council hereby makes the following preliminary findings, determinations, and declarations: (a) The Project, which will be refinanced with proceeds of the Bonds, consists of a multifamily housing development designed and intended to be used for rental occupancy primarily by seniors. (b) The proceeds of the Bonds will be loaned to the Company and the proceeds thereof, along with other available funds, will be used to refinance the Project, fund required reserve funds, and pay costs of issuance of the Bonds. The City will enter into a loan agreement (or other revenue agreement) with the Company requiring loan repayments from the Company in amounts sufficient to repay the loan of the proceeds of the Bonds when due and requiring the Company to pay all costs of maintaining and insuring the Project, including taxes thereon. (c) In preliminarily authorizing the issuance of the Bonds, the City’s purpose is to further the policies of the Act. (d) The Bonds will be special, limited obligations of the City payable solely from the revenues pledged to the payment thereof, will not be a general or moral obligation of the City, and will not be secured by or payable from revenues derived from any exercise of the taxing powers of the City. Section 3. Public Hearing. The City Council shall meet at 7:30 p.m. on Monday, November 21, 2016, to conduct a public hearing on the issuance of the Bonds by the City. Notice of such hearing (the “Public Notice”) will be published as required by Section 462C.04, subdivision 2 of the Act, and Section 147(f) of the Code. The City Clerk of the City is hereby authorized and directed to publish the Public Notice, in substantially the form attached hereto as EXHIBIT A, in the Sun- Sailor, the official newspaper of and a newspaper of general circulation in the City, at least fifteen (15) days before the meeting of the City Council at which the public hearing will take place. At the public hearing reasonable opportunity will be provided for interested individuals to express their views, both orally and in writing, on the proposed issuance of the Bonds. Section 4. Preliminary Approval. The City Council hereby provides preliminary approval to the issuance of the Bonds in the estimated principal amount not to exceed $12,500,000, subject to: (i) a public hearing as required by the Act and Section 147(f) of the Code; (ii) final approval following the preparation of bond documents; and (iii) final determination by the City Council that the refinancing of the Project and the issuance of the Bonds are in the best interests of the City. Section 5. Costs. The Company will pay the administrative fees of the City and pay, or, upon demand, reimburse the City for payment of, any and all costs incurred by the City in connection with the issuance of the Bonds, whether or not the Bonds are issued. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4r) Page 4 Title: Roitenberg Family Assisted Living Residence Private Activity Revenue Bond Refinancing Section 6. Commitment Conditional. The adoption of this resolution does not constitute a guaranty or firm commitment that the City will issue the Bonds as requested by the Company. The City retains the right in its sole discretion to withdraw from participation and accordingly not to issue the Bonds, or issue the Bonds in an amount less than the amount referred to herein, should the City at any time prior to issuance thereof determine that it is in the best interest of the City not to issue the Bonds, or to issue the Bonds in an amount less than the amount referred to in Section 4 hereof, or should the parties to the transaction be unable to reach agreement as to the terms and conditions of any of the documents required for the transaction. Section 7. Effective Date. This resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council October 17, 2016 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4r) Page 5 Title: Roitenberg Family Assisted Living Residence Private Activity Revenue Bond Refinancing EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO BE CONDUCTED BY THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA TO CONSIDER THE ISSUANCE OF REVENUE BONDS FOR THE BENEFIT OF SHOLOM COMMUNITY ALLIANCE, LLC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota (the “City”), will hold a public hearing on Monday, November 21, 2016, at or after 7:30 p.m. at City Hall, located at 5005 Minnetonka Boulevard in the City, to consider a proposal that the City approve and authorize the issuance of its revenue bonds, in one or more series, as taxable or tax-exempt obligations (the “Bonds”), pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, as amended (the “Act”), for the benefit of Sholom Community Alliance, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Company”), whose sole member is Sholom Community Alliance, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation. Proceeds of the Bonds are proposed to be applied to (i) the refunding the City’s Revenue Refunding Bonds (Roitenberg Family Assisted Living Residence Project), Series 2006 (the “Prior Bonds”), the proceeds of which refinanced the acquisition, development, construction, and equipping of a seventy- six (76) unit multifamily housing development located at 3610 Phillips Parkway in the City, operated as an assisted living and memory care facility for seniors (the “Project”), which is owned and operated by the Company; (ii) the funding of required reserves, if any; and (iii) the payment of costs of issuance of the Bonds. The aggregate principal amount of the proposed Bonds is estimated not to exceed $12,500,000. Following the public hearing, the City Council will consider a resolution approving the issuance of the Bonds. The Bonds will be special, limited obligations of the City, and the Bonds and interest thereon will be payable solely from the revenues and assets pledged to the payment thereof. No holder of any Bond will have the right to compel any exercise of the taxing power of the City to pay the Bonds or the interest thereon, nor to enforce payment against any property of the City except money payable by the Company to the City and pledged to the payment of the Bonds. Before issuing the Bonds, the City will enter into an agreement with the Company, whereby the Company will be obligated to make payments at least sufficient at all times to pay the principal of and interest on the Bonds when due. At the time and place fixed for the public hearing, the City Council will give all persons who appear at the hearing an opportunity to express their views with respect to the proposal. In addition, interested persons may direct any questions or file written comments respecting the proposal with the City Clerk, at or prior to said public hearing. Dated: [Date of Publication] BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA /s/ Melissa Kennedy City Clerk City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota 487835v1 JAE SA140-122 Offices in Minneapolis Saint Paul St. Cloud 470 U.S. Bank Plaza 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 337-9300 telephone (612) 337-9310 fax www.kennedy-graven.com Affirmative Action, Equal Opportunity Employer JULIE A. EDDINGTON Attorney at Law Direct Dial (612) 337-9213 Email: jeddington@kennedy-graven.com October 11, 2016 Tim Simon, Chief Financial Officer City of St. Louis Park 5005 Minnetonka Boulevard St. Louis Park, MN 55416-2216 Re: Resolution calling a public hearing on the issuance of revenue bonds proposed to be issued by the City of St. Louis Park for the benefit of Sholom Community Alliance, LLC Dear Tim, In 2006 the City of St. Louis Park (the “City”) issued its Revenue Refunding Bonds (Roitenberg Family Assisted Living Residence Project), Series 2006 (the “Prior Bonds”), for the benefit of Sholom Community Alliance, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Company”), whose sole member is Sholom Community Alliance, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation. The Company applied the proceeds of the Prior Bonds to refinance the acquisition, development, construction, and equipping of a seventy-six (76) unit multifamily housing development located at 3610 Phillips Parkway in the City, operated as an assisted living and memory care facility for seniors (the “Project”). The Project is owned and operated by the Company and was designed and is used for rental occupancy, primarily by elderly persons. Nursing, medical, personal care, and other health-related assisted living services are available on a twenty-four (24) hour basis to residents of the Project. The Company is requesting that the City issue revenue bonds, in one or more series, as taxable or tax-exempt obligations (the “Bonds”), in the estimated maximum principal amount of $12,500,000, to refinance the Project. Proceeds of the Bonds would also be used to finance required reserves and pay costs of issuance of the Bonds. The Bonds, if issued, will be considered “housing bonds” issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, as amended (the “Act”). Pursuant to Section 462C.04, subdivision 2 of the Act and Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, the City Council is required to conduct a public hearing on the issuance of the Bonds. Enclosed is a resolution to be considered by the City Council on October 17, 2016, calling a public hearing on the issuance of the Bonds. If the City Council adopts the enclosed resolution, the City will be asked to conduct the public hearing on November 21, 2016. Following the public hearing, the City Council will be asked to consider a resolution providing final approval of the issuance of the Bonds and authorizing the execution of documents in connection therewith. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4r) Title: Roitenberg Family Assisted Living Residence Private Activity Revenue Bond Refinancing Page 6 487835v1 JAE SA140-122 The Borrower will agree to pay the out-of-pocket expenses of the City with respect to this transaction as well as the City’s administrative fee. I will be attending the City Council meeting on October 17, 2016 and can answer any questions that may arise during the meeting. Please contact me with any questions you may have prior to the City Council meeting. Sincerely, Julie A. Eddington City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4r) Title: Roitenberg Family Assisted Living Residence Private Activity Revenue Bond Refinancing Page 7 City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2016 (Roitenberg Family Assisted Living Residence Project) Issuer Fee Comparison Series 2006 Bonds Series 2016 Bonds Date Outstanding Balance Issuer Fee Outstanding Balance Issuer Fee 02/01/2017 10,660,000.00 6,662.50 10,945,000.00 6,840.63 08/15/2017 10,560,000.00 6,600.00 10,820,000.00 6,762.50 02/15/2018 10,455,000.00 6,534.38 10,820,000.00 6,762.50 08/15/2018 10,350,000.00 6,468.75 10,665,000.00 6,665.63 02/15/2019 10,240,000.00 6,400.00 10,665,000.00 6,665.63 08/15/2019 10,130,000.00 6,331.25 10,510,000.00 6,568.75 02/15/2020 10,015,000.00 6,259.38 10,510,000.00 6,568.75 08/15/2020 9,900,000.00 6,187.50 10,350,000.00 6,468.75 02/15/2021 9,780,000.00 6,112.50 10,350,000.00 6,468.75 08/15/2021 9,650,000.00 6,031.25 10,185,000.00 6,365.63 02/15/2022 9,520,000.00 5,950.00 10,185,000.00 6,365.63 08/15/2022 9,385,000.00 5,865.63 10,015,000.00 6,259.38 02/15/2023 9,250,000.00 5,781.25 10,015,000.00 6,259.38 08/15/2023 9,110,000.00 5,693.75 9,840,000.00 6,150.00 02/15/2024 8,965,000.00 5,603.13 9,840,000.00 6,150.00 08/15/2024 8,820,000.00 5,512.50 9,660,000.00 6,037.50 02/15/2025 8,670,000.00 5,418.75 9,660,000.00 6,037.50 08/15/2025 8,515,000.00 5,321.88 9,475,000.00 5,921.88 02/15/2026 8,355,000.00 5,221.88 9,475,000.00 5,921.88 08/15/2026 8,190,000.00 5,118.75 9,280,000.00 5,800.00 02/15/2027 8,020,000.00 5,012.50 9,280,000.00 5,800.00 08/15/2027 7,845,000.00 4,903.13 9,080,000.00 5,675.00 02/15/2028 7,665,000.00 4,790.63 9,080,000.00 5,675.00 08/15/2028 7,485,000.00 4,678.13 8,870,000.00 5,543.75 02/15/2029 7,300,000.00 4,562.50 8,870,000.00 5,543.75 08/15/2029 7,110,000.00 4,443.75 8,655,000.00 5,409.38 02/15/2030 6,910,000.00 4,318.75 8,655,000.00 5,409.38 08/15/2030 6,705,000.00 4,190.63 8,430,000.00 5,268.75 02/15/2031 6,495,000.00 4,059.38 8,430,000.00 5,268.75 08/15/2031 6,280,000.00 3,925.00 8,195,000.00 5,121.88 02/15/2032 6,060,000.00 3,787.50 8,195,000.00 5,121.88 08/15/2032 5,835,000.00 3,646.88 7,950,000.00 4,968.75 02/15/2033 5,600,000.00 3,500.00 7,950,000.00 4,968.75 08/15/2033 5,355,000.00 3,346.88 7,695,000.00 4,809.38 02/15/2034 5,105,000.00 3,190.63 7,695,000.00 4,809.38 08/15/2034 4,850,000.00 3,031.25 7,425,000.00 4,640.63 02/15/2035 4,590,000.00 2,868.75 7,425,000.00 4,640.63 08/15/2035 4,320,000.00 2,700.00 7,145,000.00 4,465.63 02/15/2036 4,040,000.00 2,525.00 7,145,000.00 4,465.63 08/15/2036 3,755,000.00 2,346.88 6,850,000.00 4,281.25 02/15/2037 3,460,000.00 2,162.50 6,850,000.00 4,281.25 08/15/2037 3,155,000.00 1,971.88 6,540,000.00 4,087.50 02/15/2038 2,845,000.00 1,778.13 6,540,000.00 4,087.50 08/15/2038 2,525,000.00 1,578.13 6,220,000.00 3,887.50 02/15/2039 2,195,000.00 1,371.88 6,220,000.00 3,887.50 08/15/2039 1,855,000.00 1,159.38 5,880,000.00 3,675.00 02/15/2040 1,505,000.00 940.63 5,880,000.00 3,675.00 08/15/2040 1,145,000.00 715.63 5,525,000.00 3,453.13 02/15/2041 780,000.00 487.50 5,525,000.00 3,453.13 08/15/2041 --5,155,000.00 3,221.88 02/15/2042 5,155,000.00 3,221.88 08/15/2042 4,765,000.00 2,978.13 02/15/2043 4,765,000.00 2,978.13 08/15/2043 4,360,000.00 2,725.00 02/15/2044 4,360,000.00 2,725.00 08/15/2044 3,935,000.00 2,459.38 02/15/2045 3,935,000.00 2,459.38 08/15/2045 3,490,000.00 2,181.25 02/15/2046 3,490,000.00 2,181.25 08/15/2046 3,020,000.00 1,887.50 02/15/2047 3,020,000.00 1,887.50 08/15/2047 2,530,000.00 1,581.25 02/15/2048 2,530,000.00 1,581.25 08/15/2048 2,015,000.00 1,259.38 02/15/2049 2,015,000.00 1,259.38 08/15/2049 1,475,000.00 921.88 02/15/2050 1,475,000.00 921.88 08/15/2050 910,000.00 568.75 02/15/2051 910,000.00 568.75 08/15/2051 -- Total $207,068.75 $302,984.38 Roitenberg 161010 | Issue Summary | 10/11/2016 | 2:51 PM Dougherty & Company LLC Public Finance City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4r) Title: Roitenberg Family Assisted Living Residence Private Activity Revenue Bond Refinancing Page 8 Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: October 17, 2016 Consent Agenda Item: 4s OFFICIAL MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA AUGUST 17, 2016 – 6:00 p.m. COUNCIL CHAMBERS MEMBERS PRESENT: Lynne Carper, Claudia Johnston-Madison, Torrey Kanne, Lisa Peilen, Richard Person, Joe Tatalovich, Ethan Rickert (youth member) MEMBERS ABSENT: Carl Robertson STAFF PRESENT: Sean Walther, Phillip Elkin 1. Call to Order – Roll Call 2. Approval of Minutes of August 3, 2016 Commissioner Carper asked that corrections be made to the minutes as follows: 2A. Approval of July 20, 2016 minutes should indicate that Commissioner Robertson seconded the motion of approval; 3B. Arlington Row Apts. West public hearing should indicate that Commissioner Kanne seconded the motion recommending approval. Commissioner Carper made a motion to approve the minutes of August 3, 2016 as amended. Commissioner Person seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 3-0-3 (Johnston-Madison, Peilen and Tatalovich abstained). 3. Hearings A. Floodplain District Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments Applicant: City of St. Louis Park Case No.: 16-34-ZA Sean Walther, Planning and Zoning Supervisor, presented the staff report. He explained that the amendments pertain to Floodplain Districts in order to remain in compliance with Federal and State regulations and to maintain the City’s eligibility to participate in the National Flood Insurance Program. He explained further that the city needs to update its floodplain ordinance and floodplain district boundaries to adhere to new federal and state requirements no later than November 4, 2016. Mr. Walther stated that 215 property owners whose land intersects changes to the floodplain district boundary were notified of the public hearing. Mr. Walther presented and discussed the floodplain district boundary changes map. He noted that three hand-outs with FAQs, detailed maps and topography data are provided for residents in attendance. He said questions about individual properties can be answered after the Planning Commission meeting adjourns. Commissioner Peilen asked how frequently the map is revised by the federal government. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4s) Page 2 Title: Planning Commission Meeting Minutes August 17, 2016 Mr. Walther said he believed the last map revision occurred in 2004. Mr. Walther spoke about online tools which the city proposes to provide to property owners with resources for more information regarding Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps. Chair Johnston-Madison opened the public hearing. Sandra Ewing, 3148 Hillsboro Ave S., spoke about flooding at her property two years ago. At that time fire staff said they didn’t need to sandbag because of the structure elevation. She asked if FEMA bases flood zones on topographic data. She commented that some neighboring properties flooded, some did not. She spoke about having to hire a surveyor in 1996. Mr. Walther responded that the 100-year flood plain does have an elevation associated with it. It varies throughout the Minnehaha Creek area in St. Louis Park. He spoke about the letter of amendment process as well as proposed mapping tools to assist residents. He noted that FEMA maps are not perfect but they are an assessment of risk. He said topographical data and rainfall data is much improved since the last map revision in 2004. Katherine Heyerdahl, 3171 Hillsboro Ave. S., said she has done a lot of research on her own. She said she has not been able to file a request for map amendment as there has been a hold on all changes during the last three years. She said the FEMA website has the ability for property owners to attach digital documents to support an amendment request rather than having to hire a surveyor. She commented that Anoka now has high quality website maps which can be submitted to FEMA. Mr. Walther responded that Anoka County is about one year ahead of the city in this process. St. Louis Park hopes to replicate the tools that Anoka County now has. He said the city’s goal is to be able to provide resources to residents around Labor Day. As no one else was present wishing to speak, the Chair closed the public hearing. Commissioner Peilen made a motion recommending approval of the Zoning Ordinance Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment pertaining to Floodplain Districts. Commissioner Carper seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 6-0. 4. Other Business: None 5. Communications: None 6. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 6:40 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Nancy Sells Recording Secretary Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: October 17, 2016 Consent Agenda Item: 4t OFFICIAL MINUTES Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission April 20, 2016, 6:30 p.m. Meeting Westwood Hills Nature Center 1. Call to Order Ms. Foulkes, Chair, called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. Commission members present: Sarah Foulkes, George Foulkes, George Hagemann, Tiffany Hoffmann and Peter May Commission members absent: Elizabeth Griffin, Edward Halvorson and Kirk Hawkinson Staff present: Kala Fisher, Solid Waste Program Coordinator, Nicole Mardell, Planner, Mark Oestreich, Westwood Hills Nature Center Manager, Jim Vaughan, Natural Resources Coordinator, Cindy Walsh, Director of Operations and Recreation, Jason West, Recreation Superintendent and Carrie Mandler, Recording Secretary. 2. Approval of Minutes a. March 16, 2016 Commission member May requested a revision to page six, sixth paragraph, first sentence in paragraph. The minutes should state, “The nine Wolfe Park neighbors that attended the meeting voted for a Little Tikes structure in primary colors.” It was moved by Commission member May, seconded by Commission member Hagemann to approve the March 16, 2016 meeting minutes as amended. The motion passed 5 – 0. 3. New Business a. “Parkway 25” Redevelopment (Nicole Mardell) Nicole Mardell, Associate Planner, reviewed the “Parkway 25” Redevelopment proposal. The site is the former Vescio’s and ValuStay Inn location, 4001 and 4025 Highway 7. The two parcels total 1.58 acres. She discussed the City of St. Louis Park Subdivision Ordinance background, the proposed “Parkway 25” Redevelopment, and city staff proposal to the Sela Group developers to provide cash-in-lieu of land payment per the ordinance. A short discussion followed. In response to questions from Commission members, Ms. Walsh advised the nearest parks are Bass Lake and Fern Hill. The proposed units are rental units. Ms. Walsh advised the funds would be paid in a lump sum and added to the Capital Improvement Program fund. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4t) Page 2 Title: Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting Minutes of April 20, 2016 Based on the proposed 105 units the estimated fees are as follows: Park Dedication: $157,500 Trail Dedication: $23,625 It was moved by Commission member Hagemann, to approve accepting cash-in-lieu of land for the “Parkway 25” Redevelopment proposal; seconded unanimously. Motion passed 5 – 0. b. Zero Waste Ordinance (Kala Fisher) Kala Fisher, solid Waste Program Coordinator, discussed the Zero Waste Ordinance adopted by council in December of 2015. The goal of the ordinance is to reduce the amount of waste created from food and beverage sales. Licensed food establishments will be required to use packaging that is either reusable, returnable, recyclable, or compostable when serving food that is ready-to-eat. It will also require food establishments to provide on–site recycling and organics recycling receptacles for food and beverage packaging that is discarded by customers who dine on-site. The Ordinance will be effective January 1, 2017. Any food service establishment that prepares food on-site including restaurants convenience stores, movie theaters, hospital and clinic areas, city facilities and food trucks will have to comply. Number six plastics are no longer allowed under the new ordinance. Pre-packaged food that is shipped in is exempt from the ordinance. The city has hired a new staff, Emily Barker, who will be the main contact for ordinance compliance. She will assist with contacting and educating businesses, as well as coordinating vendors. In order to help businesses prepare for the new requirements, the city is holding a Packaging Fair on Tuesday, May 17 from 9 a.m. – noon at Beth El Synagogue. Exhibitors will include vendors who sell packaging products that comply with the ordinance along with other professionals in the recycling/composting industry. Ms. Barker will be available to discuss the ordinance and assist businesses through the transition. Ms. Walsh commented the city is hopeful a majority of businesses will attend the fair to have their questions answered and find suppliers for the products they need. A discussion followed. In response to a question from Mr. Hagemann, Ms. Fisher defined a recyclable product, in terms of the ordinance, as one that contains recyclable material for which there is a robust market. In response to a question from Ms. Walsh, Ms. Fisher advised fast food wrappers will be given a one year exemption. Ms. Walsh advised the city anticipates many requests for exemptions. Mr. Foulkes inquired as to who will enforce the ordinance. Ms. Fisher advised it will be carried out by the solid waste staff. The Hennepin County Department of Health will also be involved. Ms. Hoffmann asked how receptive to the changes establishments have been to date. Ms. Fisher stated some have already started compliance and some still have questions. Mr. Foulkes asked how the national food chains are affected. Ms. Fisher advised some will take a little more time to incorporate the changes, however, there are similar ordinances in other large cities across the country. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4t) Page 3 Title: Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting Minutes of April 20, 2016 Ms. Fisher advised paper cups may be more stringent due to an issue with paper cup linings recently brought to light. Paper cups will need to be certified compostable cups. Mr. West advised the Rec Center began using compostable materials last year. In response to a question from Mr. Vaughan regarding the amount of energy used in making the new products, Ms. Fisher advised the ordinance emphasis is on waste reduction rather than on the life cycle of products. Mr. Oestreich inquired if the compostable waste is taken to Hennepin County. Ms. Fisher advised the compost is taken to the Empire Site in Rosemount. In response to a question from Ms. Walsh regarding an increased cost to businesses, Ms. Fisher advised when weighing out higher zero waste costs, all facts should be considered including potential reduced garbage removal costs. In addition, there are grants available through Hennepin County. The grants will be discussed at the fair on May 17. Mr. Hagemann inquired if caterers will need to comply. Ms. Fisher advised they will be given a one year exemption. In response to a question from Mr. Foulkes, Ms. Fisher advised caterers do not need to register for events in St. Louis Park. Larger venues will be asked to notify vendors of the ordinance. Ms. Walsh summarized the process will take some time. The initial focus will be on education. There will be extensive public contact. c. West End Festival Site (Jason West) Mr. West presented a map of the new location for the West End Festival Site on Gamble Drive. In order to streamline the special use process for event organizers, Mr. West and Nate Rosa, Recreation Supervisor, compiled packets containing all of the permits required for rental of the site. There is a half day or whole day rental option. In response to a question from Ms. Hoffman, Mr. West advised the fees are $800 for half day and $1,600 for full day. The first event of the season is the City Pages Beer Festival scheduled for May 21 from 5 – 9 p.m. Multiple departments including police, zoning and inspections are involved. Mr. West and Mr. Rosa will attend as city staff. There is also a wine festival that is potentially scheduling an event in August. The city prefers to limit festival activity on the West End Festival Site to one event per month. 4. Old Business a. Minnehaha Creek Clean Up (May 7) Logistics (Jim Vaughan) Mr. Vaughan reviewed the Minnehaha Creek Clean Up scheduled for May 7. Check-in will be at the southeast corner of the Bremer Bank building (across from Target). Ms. Foulkes advised the boys lacrosse team is invited. Ms. Walsh added that Commission member Hawkinson confirmed he is attending along with a Girl Scout troop. Commission members and staff were asked to e-mail Mr. Vaughan with work preferences. In response to a recommendation from Ms. Walsh to create a contact procedure in the event of rain, Mr. Vaughan passed around the map and each Commission member wrote contact information on the back of the map. The event is posted on the City of St. Louis Park website. Mr. Hagemann mentioned the event has been posted on the “Meet Up” website in City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4t) Page 4 Title: Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting Minutes of April 20, 2016 the past. Mr. Vaughan noted there has been favorable participation in the past. In response to a question from Mr. Foulkes, Mr. Vaughan advised the creek clean-up area will be surveyed in advance. There will be maintenance staff present for the event. There are 100 trees to plant at the Arbor Day event to be held on May 14 at Bass Lake from 9 – noon. There will be music, Woodsy the owl and the Westwood Hills Nature Center staff will attend with a live raptor. The Organic Living Workshop was April 16 with approximately 30 exhibitors, including Kala Fisher, Solid Waste Coordinator, and Mark Zembryki, Naturalist, Westwood Hills Nature Center with a volunteer and the hawk and owl. Turnout was low perhaps due to beautiful weather and the Highway 100 closure. Next year the new outside complex might be available for the event. The tree sale is still in progress. A total of 275 out of 350 trees are already ordered. Tree pick-up dates are May 7 and 9. The limit is three per resident. This is the ninth year for the tree sale. Emerald ash borer has not been found in St. Louis Park at this time, however, Mr. Vaughan advised it will be here soon. There are some injections available to protect the trees. (Sarah Foulkes dismissed herself at 7:40 p.m.) b. Westwood Hills Nature Center Master Plan Update (Mark Oestreich / Jason West) Mr. Oestreich advised staff met with the architect on April 20 to edit a draft of the Westwood Hills Nature Center Master Plan. They will create a final draft and present it to the City Council on May 23. In response to a question by Mr. Hagemann, Mr. Oestreich advised there are no significant changes from the previous plan. The plan still supports an interpretive center building closer to the parking lot. There are a few minor changes and clarifications. 6. Staff Communication Mr. Oestreich updated the Commission members on the current boardwalk project. During routine maintenance it was discovered the boardwalk anchoring system had rotted from wind and ice damage. The League of Minnesota Cities, who insure the City of St. Louis Park, advised closure of the boardwalk. Further information will be taken into consideration before the League will make a recommendation. The 2016 Capital Improvement Program includes funding for a new trail bridge at Westwood Hills Nature Center. Mr. Oestreich is gathering estimates for the bridge. Mr. Foulkes requested the boardwalk be completed first. Earth Day is Friday, April 22. A volunteer group from General Mills is coming to Westwood and partnering with Great River Greening to work on a land restoration project. There is an Earth Day public clean up event at Westwood Hills Nature Center on Saturday, April 23 from 1 – 3:30 p.m. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 4t) Page 5 Title: Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting Minutes of April 20, 2016 An Eagle Scout and his troop built an osprey tower at Westwood Hills Nature Center this winter. An osprey was recently seen at a nearby location. The lower park building locks will be changed to a fob key system this spring. There was a rare wildlife sighting this winter at Westwood Hills Nature Center. A fisher was spotted in the park, photographed and officially identified by the DNR. It was still in the park as of early March when staff spotted it carrying a muskrat. Great horned owls nested at Westwood this winter and last Saturday the baby fledged the nest. In response to a question from Mr. Foulkes, Mr. Oestreich estimated two or three coyotes are living in the park area. Last spring a neighbor observed four pups in her yard. Mr. Vaughan advised deer numbers are low this year. Mr. Oestreich mentioned the water garden was turned on yesterday. This is the fourth season. Mr. May inquired if there will be a water feature going down to the proposed new building area. Mr. Oestreich advised possibly yes, but it will be separate from the current water garden. Mr. West advised the Rec Center rinks are converting to single ammonia cooling systems. The project has started and will take approximately three months per rink beginning with the West rink. Mr. West advised the new outdoor recreation complex ground breaking has started. Staff is investigating new sites for the skate park. 7. Member Communication No member communications. 8. Other / Future Agenda Items The next regular meeting will be held on Wednesday, May 18. 9. Adjournment It was moved by Commission member May and seconded by Commission member G. Foulkes to adjourn at 7:50 p.m. The motion passed 4 - 0. Respectfully submitted, Carrie Mandler Recording Secretary Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: October 17, 2016 Public Hearing Agenda Item: 6a EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Hennepin Distilling, LLC dba Copperwing Distillery - On-Sale Cocktail Room and Off-Sale Microdistillery Liquor Licenses RECOMMENDED ACTION: Mayor to open public hearing, take public testimony, and close public hearing. Motion to approve application from Hennepin Distilling, LLC dba Copperwing Distillery, for On-Sale Cocktail Room and Off-Sale Microdistillery Liquor Licenses for the premises located at 6409 Cambridge Street, with a license term through March 1, 2017. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the application meet the requirements of city code? SUMMARY: The City received an application from Hennepin Distilling, LLC dba Copperwing Distillery, for an on-sale cocktail room and off-sale microdistillery liquor license for the property located at 6409 Cambridge Street. Hennepin Distilling is a microdistillery licensed by the State of Minnesota to produce less than 40,000 proof gallons of alcohol per year. The cocktail room will be approximately 600 square feet in size with seating for 40 guests. The applicant intends to open for business in December, 2016. The main principals listed on the application are Brian Idelkope, Chris Palmisano, and Kyle Kettering. All three individuals will be responsible for overseeing business operations, however Mr. Kettering will be largely responsible for the day-to- day operation of the cocktail room. A cocktail room license authorizes the on-sale of distilled liquor produced by the distiller for consumption on the premises of or adjacent to one distillery location owned by the distiller. City Code regulations do not allow a restaurant at a cocktail room. Additionally, a microdistillery may be issued a license for the off-sale of distilled spirits. The license allows the sale of one 375 milliliter bottle per customer per day of product manufactured on-site. Minnesota Statute § 340A.504 regulates the hours and days of sale. In this case, on-sale of spirits would not be allowed on Sundays as they can only be made in conjunction with the sale of food. State law currently prohibits off-sale on Sundays. The Police Department conducted a full background investigation, and nothing was discovered during the course of the investigation that would warrant denial of the license. The application and police report are on file in the City Clerk’s office. The required notice of the public hearing was published on September 29, 2016. Should Council approve the liquor license, no actual license will be issued until all requirements have been fulfilled with the City Inspections Department, Hennepin County, and the State Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Fees for this applicant include $500 for the police background investigation and $600 for the On-Sale Cocktail Room license and $200 for the Off-Sale Microdistillery license. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: None Prepared by: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: October 17, 2016 Public Hearing Agenda Item: 6b EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: MSA Rehabilitation Project - Texas Avenue- Project No. 4017-1101 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Mayor to open public hearing, take public testimony, and close public hearing. Motion to Adopt Resolution accepting the project report, establishing improvement project No. 4017-1101 for the MSA Rehabilitation Project- Texas Avenue, approving preliminary layout Concept 2 and ordering development of final plans. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish to continue to pursue the proposed street rehabilitation project scope identified in this report? SUMMARY: In 2017, Texas Avenue between Highway 7 and Minnetonka Boulevard is proposed to be reconstructed. This street is an important north/south route in the City and is designated as a Municipal State Aid (MSA) road which makes it eligible for state funding (gas tax dollars). In order to qualify for funding, the road needs to be constructed to state aid standards. Given work load demands, the City engaged the consulting firm, Kimley Horn, to complete the study and design of Texas Avenue. CenterPoint Energy (CPE) will be replacing their 24 inch high pressure gas main on this segment of Texas Avenue in 2017. After reviewing the condition of the road, staff recommends that the City pursue a reconstruction project. Coordinating the City project with the CPE project will result in cost savings as well as reduce inconvenience to the property owners and the travelling public. The scope of the city’s project includes: Street reconstruction Bike lanes Sidewalk reconstruction Streetlight replacement Signal rehabilitation/ replacement (33rd Street and 36th Street) Miscellaneous utility rehabilitation FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The engineer’s estimate for this project is $4,019,535. Construction - $3,500,715, Engineering and Administration - $518,820. This project is included in the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for 2017. Funding will be provided by a combination of MSA, Utility Funds, and General Obligation Bonds (Connect the Park). VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged community. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion Resolution Location Map Renderings Concepts Resident Comments Prepared by: Joseph Shamla, Senior Engineering Project Manager Reviewed by: Debra M. Heiser, Engineering Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6b) Page 2 Title: MSA Rehabilitation Project - Texas Ave. - Project No. 4017-1101 DISCUSSION BACKGROUND: In 2017, Texas Avenue between Highway 7 and Minnetonka Boulevard is proposed to be reconstructed. This road serves many residents and is one of only 4 continuous north/ south routes in the City. This road is a major collector, carrying 8,200 vehicles a day. It is designated as a Municipal State Aid (MSA) road which makes it eligible for state gas tax funds. In order to qualify for funding, the road needs to be constructed to state aid standards. Texas Avenue was last reconstructed in 1960. In order to ensure that the reconstructed Texas Avenue will meet the needs of the City for another 50 years, staff is taking a look at existing and future transportation needs in the corridor for the recommended design. What follows is a summary for this project. Private Utility Replacement CenterPoint Energy (CPE) will be replacing their 24 inch high pressure gas main on this segment of Texas Avenue in 2017. This work will be quite intrusive and will disrupt traffic and/ or parking on Texas Avenue. This is part of a larger regional project which extends into Hopkins. Staff has noticed an increase in the number of leaks on this line. CPE has plans to continue the replacement of their pipeline on Texas Ave north of Minnetonka Boulevard in 2020. Pavement Rehabilitation A team of staff members from Streets, Utilities, and Engineering worked together to determine the pavement preservation technique recommended for Texas Avenue. After reviewing the condition of the road, staff recommends that the city pursue a reconstruction project. Coordinating the city project with the CPE project will result in cost savings as well as reduce inconvenience to the property owners and the traveling public. A full reconstruct consists of the removal of the curb and gutter, pavement, and sidewalk. In addition to the reconstruct, staff is anticipating the need to upgrade the curb ramps to meet the American with Disabilities Act (ADA), and the reconstruction of some of the existing retaining walls. City Utility Construction As a part of all of our street rehabilitation projects, the City evaluates the condition of the existing sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and water main. Only minor replacement of this infrastructure is necessary on Texas Avenue. Tree Impact At this time it is difficult to determine the actual impact to trees. There are 14 trees located within the right of way. Staff will be working with the City Forester to ensure as many trees are saved as possible. He has completed a tree survey to determine the health, species and size of the trees. The first option we use when it comes to trees is to avoid the conflict. In areas where there is a potential conflict, the sidewalk could shift towards the back of the curb to allow less impact to the tree or roots. Once a preliminary layout is approved, staff will be able to identify the conflicts and work on how the final plan could be modified. If a tree needs to be removed it will be replaced on a caliper inch basis. Therefore a 10 caliper inch tree would be replaced by 4 trees which are 2.5 caliper inch per tree. These replacement trees would be located within the Texas Avenue right- of- way as space allows or planted in other locations in the City. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6b) Page 3 Title: MSA Rehabilitation Project - Texas Ave. - Project No. 4017-1101 Stormwater Management The current design options under consideration are at a 30% level. At this time staff has not identified the stormwater treatment strategy for the corridor because each concept provides different stormwater management opportunities. When a preliminary layout is chosen to move forward with final design, staff will meet with Kimley Horn to match the best treatment techniques to the corridor. Design of Texas Avenue A corridor study has been completed to help guide the design of Texas Avenue. Using existing and forecasted future traffic data and input from residents, we have developed 2 recommended typical street sections for the City Council’s consideration. Initially there were three typical sections. The Comprehensive Plan designated Texas Avenue as a 3-lane road section. The corridor study indicates that the 3-lane typical section is not necessary for safety or traffic flow. The Comprehensive Plan also shows a bikeway on this segment of Texas Avenue. The Connect the Park implementation plan identified this bikeway connection as a “Priority 1” bike corridor, and recommended it be implemented in the first 5 years of the Connect the Park CIP. This bikeway segment is a part of the connected city wide network of 32 miles of bikeways that are proposed for implementation as a part of the CIP. In 2017, there are also proposed bikeways to the north and south of this project on Texas Avenue. If all segments of bikeway on Texas are implemented it will provide residents with a safe connection to both the north and south regional trails, as well as Texa-Tonka and Knollwood Mall. Working with our consultant we have looked at many different options for Texas Avenue. Based on the vehicle volumes, speeds, existing right- of- way, and number of driveways, the recommended bikeway design for this segment of road is dedicated on street bike lanes. A parking study has been completed to help better understand the extent and frequency of on- street parking in the corridor. Based on this information, it is recommended that the typical section of Texas Ave. include the following components: Two vehicle travel lanes Bike lanes On-street parking bays The overall corridor design also includes: Additional lanes, as needed, at the intersections for turning movements Pedestrian safety improvements Bump outs at intersections for speed management Digital speed display signs for speed management ADA improvements at intersections and at signals Stormwater management There are two typical sections which are provided with this report and the main difference between the two options is the amount of on-street parking provided in the corridor. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6b) Page 4 Title: MSA Rehabilitation Project - Texas Ave. - Project No. 4017-1101 Public Process Engineering hosted a public meeting on July 20 to gather input prior to starting the preliminary design. Another open house was held on September 14 to inform the public about the two options being considered for this project. We have received the following feedback from residents on the proposed design. Parking - Texas Avenue is lined by single family homes on both sides for the majority of the corridor. Residents have indicated that on-street parking is important to them. Traffic Management - Residents have provided staff feedback that they are concerned with the speed of traffic on the corridor. Bike lanes - feedback from the meetings and correspondence indicates that the property owners in the corridor are concerned about the inclusion of bike lanes in the project scope. Comments from the residents regarding this project are attached to this report. Recommendation Engineering is recommending that the City Council approve Concept 2 as the preliminary layout to move forward with final design. This concept: Includes parking on both sides of the street so that property owners can park near the front of their homes and not have to cross Texas Avenue at mid-block locations. Provides dedicated space for bicycles, making the corridor safer for all users. The addition of bicycle lanes on this section of Texas Avenue along with the additional bikeway projects proposed in 2017 will connect two regional bike trails and multiple businesses along the road. Completing an important north/ south route in the city’s active transportation network. Incorporates proven traffic management techniques to reduce speeds by narrowing the feel of the corridor. This includes constructing bump outs at intersections, providing green boulevards to plant trees in order to introduce a vertical element close to the road, and adding speed boards. Improves pedestrian safety by moving the sidewalks away from the road, narrows the crossing distance at intersections through bump outs, and adding countdown timers at signals. Proposed Schedule: In order to ensure there is enough time to construct the improvements in 2017, staff needs direction on which of the two options to proceed with for final design. To achieve this, we are asking the City Council to approve a preliminary layout to move forward into final design. The following is the proposed schedule: Public Hearing - Approve Preliminary Layout October 17, 2016 60 percent plans November 2016 Public meeting to review final plans January 2017 Approve Plans/ Authorization to Bid by City Council February 2017 Construction April – Nov 2017 City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6b) Page 5 Title: MSA Rehabilitation Project - Texas Ave. - Project No. 4017-1101 RESOLUTION NO. 16-____ RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE PROJECT REPORT, ESTABLISHING IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 4017-1101, APPROVING CONCEPT 2 AND AUTHORIZING DESIGN OF FINAL PLANS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park has received a report from the Project Engineer related to the Municipal State Aid Project- Texas Avenue – Project No. 4017- 1101: NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, that: 1. The Project Report regarding Project No. 4017-1101 is hereby accepted. 2. Such improvements as proposed are necessary, cost effective, and feasible as detailed in the Project Report. 3. The proposed preliminary layout Concept 2 is hereby approved. 4. Final plan development is authorized following the typical section approved by the City Council. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council October 17, 2016 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk ")5 ")20 ¬«7 MINNETONKA TEXAS32ND 31STAQUILA 34TH 35TH RHODEISLANDAQUILA34THWYOMING WALKER 33RD 36TH LAKEWYOMING31STSUMTER32ND 32 1/2 S E R V I C E D R H I G H W A Y 7 31ST 37TH 33RD 30 1/2 YUKONSUMTERUTAH34 1/2XYLON SUMTERMARYLANDNEVADAOREGONPENNSYLVANIAQUEBECQUEBECVIRGINIAPENNSYLVANIA31ST QUEBECQUEBECOREGONZINRANXYLONYUKONVIRGINIAXYLONVIRGINIAWYOMINGUTAH37TH 29TH VIRGINIAAQUILAAQUILAPRIVATEVIRGINIAUTAH0 0.15 0.3 0.45 0.6Miles ¯ Legend 2017 MSA Street Rehabilitation City Limits 2017 MSA Street Rehabilitation (Texas Ave. S.) City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6b) Title: MSA Rehabilitation Project - Texas Ave. - Project No. 4017-1101 Page 6 Texas Avenue HWY 7 TO MINNETONKA BLVD Existing Conditions Photo of Texas Avenue at 31st Street City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6b) Title: MSA Rehabilitation Project - Texas Ave. - Project No. 4017-1101 Page 7 Texas Avenue HWY 7 TO MINNETONKA BLVD Concept No. 1 Rendering of Texas Avenue at 31st Street City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6b) Title: MSA Rehabilitation Project - Texas Ave. - Project No. 4017-1101 Page 8 Texas Avenue HWY 7 TO MINNETONKA BLVD Concept No. 2 Rendering of Texas Avenue at 31st Street City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6b) Title: MSA Rehabilitation Project - Texas Ave. - Project No. 4017-1101 Page 9 Texas Avenue HWY 7 TO MINNETONKA BLVD Existing Typical Section City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6b) Title: MSA Rehabilitation Project - Texas Ave. - Project No. 4017-1101 Page 10 Texas Avenue HWY 7 TO MINNETONKA BLVD Concept No. 1 City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6b) Title: MSA Rehabilitation Project - Texas Ave. - Project No. 4017-1101 Page 11 Texas Avenue HWY 7 TO MINNETONKA BLVD Concept No. 2 City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6b) Title: MSA Rehabilitation Project - Texas Ave. - Project No. 4017-1101 Page 12 2017 Municipal State Aid ProjectTexas AvenueC.P. 4017‐1101Open House #1 Comments10/12/2016SourceDateCommenty CategoryCommentOpen House9/14/16 Bike LanesNo bike lanes on Texas. By your own traffic count (8,200 veh per day). You are creating an unsafe situation in both concepts. Move bike lanes to Sumter Avenue.Open House9/14/16 Bike LanesI support bike lanes on Texas Avenue. I currently bike on this road. Swerving around parked cars can be a nuisance. A bike lane would allow bicyclists to get on and off the Cedar Lake Trail and connect to the I‐394 Frontage Road.Open House9/14/16 General CommentsI'd like to discuss tall retaining wall and the difficulty that be created with mowing the boulevard.Open House9/14/2016 Concept PreferenceI'm more in favor of Concept No. 1, but want safety for everyone.Open House9/14/16 TrafficMaintain traffic signal at Texas Avenue and 33rd Street.Open House9/14/2016 TrafficProvide more information about backing in and out of driveways with bike lanes and bus routes.Open House9/14/2016 Pedestrian FacilitiesMaintain access for wheelchairs (several power chair users currently in street)Open House9/14/2016 TrafficWhat is the current bike count for Texas Avenue?Open House9/14/16 Concept PreferencePlease keep parking on both sides of the street.Open House9/14/16 General CommentsPlease don't put the bus stop in front of my house. I was getting used to this whole Texas Avenue reconstruction thing and then I find out that the bus stop is in front of my house. This gives me nightmares and makes me want to move yesterday. I am very upset about this and I never would have bought this house if I would have known a bus stop would be in front of my house.Open House9/14/16 Bike LanesStill don't want bike lanes on Texas Avenue ‐ too many driveways ‐ too riskyOpen House9/14/16 General CommentsConcept 2 has 12 ft boulevard ‐ not necessary ‐ takes too muchof the right‐of‐way ‐ too much of our yard is taken.Open House9/14/16 General CommentsI would suggest having more handouts and more information availabile for residents so the information can sink in and can think about your proposals instead of asking for instant feedback.Open House9/14/16 Concept PreferenceEither concept 1 or 2 works. Bike lanes are very important as a viable north‐south bike route with connections to other bikeways and trails.Open House9/14/16 General CommentsPlease don't construct boulevards for privacy and easier for residents to work with a continuous piece of property ‐ let the residents work with thatOpen House9/14/16 General CommentsMy wife is legally blind. She catches the bus everyday for work. It is vital that she is able to catch the bus near our house on Texas Avenue. Thank you.Open House9/14/16 Concept PreferenceWant concept 1. Per perception would like more land between the sidewalk and road.Page 1 of 1City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6b) Title: MSA Rehabilitation Project - Texas Ave. - Project No. 4017-1101Page 13 On Sep 18, 2016, at 9:17 PM, wrote: I'm sending this email to provide my input on the September 19th, upcoming special study session the Council will be meeting on, regarding the street work on Texas Ave. As a long time resident of St. Louis Park, who lives on Texas Ave, and a bike commuter, I have some serious concerns about the proposals for the Texas Ave changes. I'm going to keep my concerns short and would like you to consider the following: One of the new proposal is for a drive lane, bike lane, parking lane- now try to get out of your driveway. It’s challenging enough with parked cars, but with bikers hidden by the parked cars, I have concerns about safety. It's not really an issue right now, because there are so few bikers and the parked cars are scattered here and there. With the reconfiguration it will be far less safe for everyone. the other proposal is to concentrate the parked cars to one side of the street and alternate by blocks. This will actually be more difficult for a biker. Cars will be bunched together in a more concentrated area, on the side with the parked cars, resulting in limited sight lines for the bikers and it will be more difficult to see the cars coming out of their driveways and more difficult for drivers to see the bikers. Parked cars limit our ability to see bikers. We heard over and over again that the Connect the Park initiative requires Engineering to add the bike lane into their proposals. Making it sound that it was a done deal to have bike lanes. Really, that is not true. Connect the Park initiative needs to be considered, but doesn’t have to be done. As you all know when they complete the street work on 33rd, a decision was made not to add sidewalks to the stretch between Texas and Sumter. Apparently the Connect the Park initiative was considered and determined that is was not in the best interest to add sidewalks, despite the fact that this segment feeds directly to a park. I also want to mention that I really have no confidence in the engineering departments statements and opinions about the safety of adding bike lanes to Texas Ave. The reason I have lost confidence is because of the safety issues related to the sigh lines when you exit on Hwy 7 exit at Wooddale. In addition, the three consecutive roundabouts on Louisiana, is a safety nightmare for bikers and pedestrians. I drive that route daily, and I am so busy watching for vehicles that I don't have the ability to watch for someone in the crosswalk. The first time I encountered a pedestrian waiting to cross, I was thankful they saw me because I did not see them. Where was the Connect the Park initiative for that project? Finally, a comment about the project that recommends a 12 foot boulevard. If you lived on Texas Ave, you would know that you cannot grow grass on the boulevard. We were told at the meeting that the larger the boulevard, such as 12 feet, the grass would grow. Just take a look on Minnetonka Blvd and examine what is actually growing on the larger boulevards on that street. It's not grass. I cannot support either of the two proposals provided to us at the last meeting. We need the ability to park on the street, our garages and driveways were not designed for multiple cars. It's unrealistic to think that if we have concentrated parking altering from one block to another that people who need to park across the street will walk to the corner to safely cross the street. Instead they will cross in the middle of the street and that can only increase pedestrian car collisions. I don't see the need to create a 12 foot boulevard and for me, to take 18 inches of my front yard-yes I understand it's right of way, but there is no need to take that additional yard when there are other options available. Thank you for your thoughtful consideration of the issues address in this email. Texas Ave. Resident City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6b) Title: MSA Rehabilitation Project - Texas Ave. - Project No. 4017-1101 Page 14 Hello, Unfortunately I was not able to attend the previous meeting regarding the Texas Ave reconstruction project to provide feedback on the two concepts. After reviewing the presentation online I’m pleased to see that Concept Number 2 is still on the table however I’m concerned that Concept Number 1 is also on the table. Simply put we need parking on both sides of the street. Having parking on one side will result in multiple issues/concerns: 1. Safety: Roughly 50% of everyone parking will be required to cross the street increasing the likelihood of vehicle and pedestrian accidents. After all this is a high traffic road as your study verified (8,200 cars per day). 2. Congested Parking: With only 60 stalls available in Concept 1 (assuming everyone parks perfectly and doesn’t take up excess space) the street will often be filled to capacity. This also means some people will not be able to park in front of their house and may have to park blocks away. 3. My previous concerns listed in the below email. On another note I’m still struggling to understand why the bike lanes would be placed on such a busy street. Why not move them one block over to a street that is less traveled? I feel this would provide a greater level of safety for cyclists using the bike lanes. An example of this is 1st Ave South in the Uptown area of Minneapolis. Instead of placing the bike lanes on busy Nicollet Ave the city of Minneapolis moved the bike lanes one block over to 1st Ave South. They also did this on Bryant Ave South. Instead of placing the bike lanes on busy Lyndale Ave they moved it to a street with less traffic, Bryant Ave South. Minneapolis has lots of bike lanes. Is there something we can learn from them? I think it’s fair to say they have more experience with bike lanes than St Louis Park does. Can we solicit feedback or recommendations from them or another 3rd party on placement of bike lanes? I strongly urge you to take this into consideration for the safety of cyclists. In closing I’m not against bike lanes rather I think there may be a more ideal place to locate them. I do own a bike and use the trails and bike lanes in the St Louis Park/Minneapolis area. Resident From: Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2016 3:11 PM To: Jake Spano; Steve Hallfin; Thom Miller; Sue Sanger; Anne Mavity; Gregg Lindberg; tpbrausen@gmil.com Subject: Texas Ave. construction Dear council member I live @ Texas Ave. I think redoing the street and utilities Centerpoint has it dug up is a great idea.Adding bike lanes and taking away lawn space is just stupid. There aren't City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6b) Title: MSA Rehabilitation Project - Texas Ave. - Project No. 4017-1101 Page 15 twenty bikes that go by here on any given day.Adding bike lanes and narrowing traffic lanes will be less safe than it is now. We have steady traffic of buses and fast moving emergency vehicles every day. Besides, where is all of this bike traffic comming from and where is it going? If they're going south they hit Hwy.7. That' it. If they're going north where did they come from and how did they get there? There are other streets with very little traffic that would be safer and easy for bikers. Just because the city council ten years ago said this should be done doesn't mean it should. One of the engineers favorite cop out lines was " studies show". I think a study would show that none of the property owners on Texas Ave. think this is a good idea. VOTE NO!!!!!!!! From: Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2016 2:57 PM To: Gregg Lindberg Subject: Texas Ave Reconstruction (Support) Councilman Greg Lindberg, I'm writing to support Concept 2 of the Texas Avenue Reconstruction plan. I know that some of my neighbors have different feelings on the matter, but I thought I'd share my take. I live at Texas Ave. Currently, while Texas is used by drivers trying to create their own bypass around the Hwy 7 bridge that's not yet open, it feels like we live on a 40mph road, not a 30mph one. The reconfiguration plan, which slightly decreases lane size, will help by making drivers feel less comfortable roaring through the neighborhood at high speeds. Both my girlfriend and I enjoy biking, and would make use of a Texas Ave bike lane. Currently, just going from our house to 32nd St to reach the N Cedar Trail feels like a risky move, but we'd feel much safer with a dedicated bike lane. Finally, a letter we received from a concerned neighbor claims that the reconstruction will make it "much more difficult to back out of our driveways." I have to wonder what they're even talking about - it's difficult to back out now. Having to look through a line of parked cars to judge whether the oncoming traffic is speeding or not isn't ideal. It's the reason why I park on the street in the first place. Narrower lanes and calmer traffic would make me feel more comfortable backing out onto the street, and for this reason alone I think Concept 2 is a great idea. Texas Ave is busy right now because of Hwy 7's closure. It doesn't need to stay that way once we're not an impromptu detour. This homeowner fully supports Concept 2 of the reconstruction plan. From: Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2016 7:31 PM To: Steve Hallfin; Thom Miller; Sue Sanger; Anne Mavity; Gregg Lindberg; Tim Brausen Subject: Texas Avenue re construction I am a homeowner on Texas Avenue and I have been actively following the planning process and collecting information so that I know what to expect from the reconstruction. In understand the project proposals but remain concerned about the long term impact of what is City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6b) Title: MSA Rehabilitation Project - Texas Ave. - Project No. 4017-1101 Page 16 being proposed, specifically the addition of bike lanes. Due to the numerous narrow driveways on both sides of my block residents are often either backing in or out of their drives as they do not have space to turn around. This process is already difficult, particularly during heavy traffic times. I fear that the adjustments to parking and adding bike lanes will create a high risk of accidents when people enter or exit their drives. After the last community meeting I took the opportunity to drive down the section of Cleveland Avenue in St. Paul that was reported to be similar to the completed project on my block. I observed the flow of traffic, including the city buses and how the design and parking worked. I also noted that the area in St. Paul appeared to have more of a commercial feel with fewer homes on the block, and more significantly, there were very few driveways emptying on to Cleveland. It appears that much of the area has alleys which allow for residents to pull into the flow of traffic rather than backing in or out. I have not yet been able to identify a situation anywhere in the area that has similar features, including driveways. I believe this reflects that fact that narrow driveways and bike lanes are not a safe or successful combination. I understand the connect the park initiative and the goal of promoting active transportation and the importance of this concept to the community, however, I do not feel that Texas Ave. is the safest location for bike lanes. I urge you to consider the challenges that will be created for home owners trying to enter and exit driveways on the street that will be created by promotion of bike traffic on the street. Accidents between cars and bikers obviously have the potential to be devastating. I feel strongly that safer options exist to provide connections than placement of bike lanes that intersect with many narrow driveways. Please look at other options that can better assure the safety of bike riders and Texas Avenue residents. Texas Avenue Resident From: Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2016 11:20 PM To: Gregg Lindberg Subject: Texas Avenue.. Hi Greg: I am Writing to you about the Texas Avenue Project. I have lived at 3036 Texas Avenue for 55 Years !!! I feel the need to voice my opinion and concern on this issue. Putting a bike path on Texas Avenue has got to be the "DUMBEST" Thing i have ever heard of... First off , Not 1 person living on Texas Avenue wants a bike path on our street. I have talked to Neighbors, friends and Others. (Not 1 person is in favor of a Bike Path). Second, it is a Safety Hazard. Why would you put a bike path on a road that gets over 8,500 cars a day on it ??? That is the Craziest thing i have ever heard of. The margin of error for kids and other bikers is only inches. If 1 kid or teenager or adult gets killed or injured because of this bike path How are you going to feel if you vote City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6b) Title: MSA Rehabilitation Project - Texas Ave. - Project No. 4017-1101 Page 17 for it ?? They wouldn' t even need to get killed, what about just injured badly?? Lastly the maintenance of it. With our cold Winter's and Heat of Summer the bike path will crack and need maintenance in just a few years. Who' s going to pay for that?? I'm NOT paying for some biker's that no one cares about. Why are you guys cramming this bike path down our throats ??? We don't want it !! The few bikers that will use it, don 't even live on Texas Avenue and maybe not even in St. Louis Park!! ..Already people are moving and are thinking about moving because of this construction. Put yourself in my position and the position of us who live here on Texas Avenue. Backing out of our driveways is hard enough already and a safety hazard. We need to look for cars, pediatricians, and now biker's too ?? A biker could get hit by a car, a bus or run into someone opening a car door.. The residents are going to have to endure enough construction in the next few years, with the Minnetonka Blvd. project and the Highway 7 project. Don't add to it by putting in bike path's that we don't want or need. (You are asking way to much of us). I'm in favor of fixing what you need to and putting in new lighting and fixing the Boulevards. But NO to taking any of our land and No to the bike path. Being on the City Council You are suppose to be the VOICE of the people. I believe we have spoken loud and clear. Feel Free to e mail me with thoughts or questions ... Texas Avenue Resident From: Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2016 1:42 PM To: Jake Spano; Steve Hallfin; Thom Miller; Sue Sanger; Anne Mavity; Gregg Lindberg; Tim Brausen Subject: proposed Texas Avenue Reconstruction Dear Mayor Spano and Councilmembers Hallfin, Miller, Sanger, Mavity, Lindberg and Brausen: I realize that we need to have gas lines need to be updated, as well as the cement/asphalt roads, but I am not in favor of the 2 plans being discussed and voted on in my neighborhood for Texas Avenue, and I ask that you vote against them. I have the following reasons against the bike lanes: I am a bicyclist and ride often, but I am not in favor of having a bike lane on Texas Avenue. When I need to connect with a safe bike path, I ride about 2‐3 blocks west of me and get on the Cedar Trail. If there's ongoing construction or I want to bike in a different direction, I ride on the sidewalk to 33rd street and connect with the Cedar Trail. I believe that the existing Cedar Trail makes a bike trail on Texas Avenue redundant and a waste of money. I rarely seeing people biking on Texas Avenue ‐ and purely from a safety standpoint, see no reason why they would want to. Cars, SUVs, trucks, etc. are consistently traveling at a minimum of 40 miles per hour. As a taxpayer and member of the City Louis Park community, I believe that you represent me, and that my concerns should come before those of others. I feel that my home ownership and pride in my city is City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6b) Title: MSA Rehabilitation Project - Texas Ave. - Project No. 4017-1101 Page 18 being greatly diminished by the fact that the city would take my lawn to make consider complete strangers happy. I feel as if I don't count. I feel that the people who live on Texas ‐ and their needs and opinions should be taken into consideration before others who don't live on Texas Ave. I do not want to give up my front lawn/green space and am angry that so many healthy, mature bushes and trees would be cut down. These bushes and trees give us privacy, along with being noise and safety barriers from the traffic on Texas. I am worried about speeding vehicles driving closer to my house. This is a huge safety issue, and also a noise issue. In good weather people can drive carelessly (distracted drivers) and in the winter, accidents happen in spite of people's best driving efforts. One of the people presenting at the initial meeting at the elementary school mentioned that it was prudent to do this project (and again, I realize the pipes and asphalt need to be redone) because X amount of money had been earmarked to do it. And to me it seems like a waste of money as my sidewalks had just been put in within the last few years, along with some very nice retaining walls for others ‐‐ and clearly these don't need to be redone at this time. I ask that you take this email into consideration and vote AGAINST the bike lanes. Thank you. Texas Avenue Resident From: Date: October 9, 2016 at 4:53:49 PM CDT To: <glindberg@stlouispark.org> Subject: Reconstruction of Texas Avenue South October 9, 2016 RE: Reconstruction of Texas Avenue South Dear Councilman Lindberg: We live at Texas Avenue South and are writing to let you know my husband and I are NOT in favor of either of the proposed concepts for reconstruction to our street and are asking that you vote to leave this street as it is. Under “Concept 2” that the City is likely to adopt in less than two week, we will be losing mature trees, lawn space and retaining walls that were installed just a few years ago. Also, the city will be replacing intersections at 33rd and 34th streets that are just now being built. Additionally, it will much more difficult to back out of our driveways with the proposed bike lane. Having Bike Lanes on a City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6b) Title: MSA Rehabilitation Project - Texas Ave. - Project No. 4017-1101 Page 19 street that, according to the City Engineer, has 9200 vehicles per day is simply inviting an accident! We understand there is a biking community that is lobbying for the bike lane. Truth be told, they do not ride on Texas Avenue in the first place! “Concept 2” also indicates that there will be “pockets” of parking rather than parking also both sides of the street. We prefer leaving parking on both sides of the street so guests do not have to park a distance from our home, or have to cross this busy street because they need to park on the opposite side. Therefore, we ask again that you please cast your vote to leave Texas Avenue as it is. Thank you, Texas Avenue Resident From: Date: October 9, 2016 at 4:29:30 PM CDT To: <glindberg@stlouispark.org> Subject: Texas Ave Concept 1 & Concept 2 Concerns Dear Councilman Lindberg, I’m emailing you today to express my concern with both the “Concept 1” and “Concept 2” projects. Although I support the addition of bike lanes throughout St. Louis Park, the proposal of widening Texas Avenue to accommodate this is a very very bad use of city resources. From the September 14th Information Meeting, comparing Texas Avenue to Cleveland Avenue is extremely concerning and “Concept 2” would make this a reality. In no way are these two roads categorically the same. Additionally, the existing roadway appears to support the width required with “Concept 1”, yet the proposal for “Concept 1” calls for areas of bump-outs to be installed. For instance, the road is 42’ wide in front of my house, easily able to support “Concept 1” width requirements of 39', but with both concepts I would lose 10’ of property. This doesn’t add up. I highly encourage you to support alternative options that can achieve a bike lane without expansion of the existing road. If you would like to speak to me personally, please don’t hesitate to call. Regards, City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6b) Title: MSA Rehabilitation Project - Texas Ave. - Project No. 4017-1101 Page 20 From: Sent: Monday, October 10, 2016 7:54 AM To: Jake Spano; Thom Miller; Sue Sanger; Anne Mavity; Gregg Lindberg; Tim Brausen; Steve Hallfin Subject: Vote Against current plan To: Mayor and City Council of St. Louis Park Texas Ave Project My name is at Texas Ave. S. St. Louis Park, Mn 55426. I would like to see the board vote on not adding bike lanes to Texas Ave. Texas Ave is a very busy road and by adding bike lanes would be very dangerous for the bikers and make it more difficult on getting out of our driveways. I have lived in St. Louis Park for 50 years and would not like to see my street turn into the mess that Richfield now has on Portland Ave. I have talked to homeowners that live on Portland Ave. and they did not realize how this project would affect their right to enjoy their property and their property values. I am NOT in favor of present plan. I believe we can come up with a better option than removing trees, taking lawns, tearing down walls and taking driveways needed for parking our vehicles. Just widen out Texas a little to add some turn lanes. By removing the blvd grass area would be plenty of extra area to complete this project. We do not want or need more congestion on Texas. Please vote AGAINST adoption of current plan. Thank You, Texas Avenue Resident City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6b) Title: MSA Rehabilitation Project - Texas Ave. - Project No. 4017-1101 Page 21 1 September 29, 2016 Via Email Only The Honorable Mayor Jake Spano & St. Louis Park City Council St. Louis Park City Hall 5005 Minnetonka Blvd. St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Re: Bikes Lanes for Texas Avenue between Highway 7 and Minnetonka Blvd. Dear Mayor Spano and Council Members, I am writing to strongly encourage you to accept the city engineers’ plan to install striped bike lanes on Texas Avenue between Highway 7 and Minnetonka Boulevard in connection with the implementation of the Year 2017 Municipal State Aid (MSA) Project. As each of you are undoubtedly aware, St. Louis Park is a difficult city to get around by bike. This is particularly true if you want to ride somewhere other than off-road trails or low-volume residential streets. The 2017 MSA Project presents a rare opportunity to improve our network by installing bike lanes on Texas Avenue, as CenterPoint Energy will be carrying out major utility work on this segment, and the project will presents the opportunity to move forward with planned street improvements. I understand that on September 14, 2016, city staff hosted a public meeting in which a plan (identified as “Concept No. 2”) was presented that would accommodate bike lanes, slightly narrowed vehicle traffic lanes, and car parking on both sides of the road. Although I was not able to attend the City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6b) Title: MSA Rehabilitation Project - Texas Ave. - Project No. 4017-1101 Page 22 2 meeting, I have reviewed the presentation and believe that Concept No. 2 would be fair to cyclists, pedestrians, motorists, and residents, and should be implemented. I encourage Council to approve bikes lanes on Texas Avenue under Concept No. 2 for the following reasons: § Since Texas Avenue is a major north-south route through the western half of the city, a bike lane on this particular segment will logically connect cyclists to some of the lower-volume cross-streets, as well as the other segments of Texas Avenue that lead to other parts of the city, to the Cedar Lake Trail, and to adjacent cities. § This segment of Texas Avenue is one the city’s most important retail corridors, with Texa-Tonka on the north end, and Knollwood Mall/Cub Foods on the south end. The roads leading to these businesses should be designed to encourage people to use their bikes for shopping trips. In fact, one of the long-term tenants at Texa-Tonka is a local branch of the largest bicycle retailer in the Midwest (Erik’s), and Knollwood’s recent renovation added dozens of new bike racks. Bike lanes on Texas will certainly be put to good use. § Studies have shown that the presence of bike lanes and narrowed vehicle lanes will have a traffic-calming effect on driver behavior, thereby making the street safer for residents, vehicles, cyclists, and pedestrians. By adding the bike lanes depicted in Concept No. 2, the vehicle lanes will be reduced to no more than 11 feet in width, which is still safe for the posted speed limit of 30 mph, but will discourage speeding. § Concept No. 2, as depicted, represents the fairest compromise possible between adding bike lanes and reducing a portion of the available on-street parking. According to the September 14th staff presentation, this segment of Texas Avenue currently has on-street parking for 158 cars. Under Concept No. 2, the number of parking spots on this segment will be reduced to 96. However, staff observed that at most 54 cars were parked on this segment during peak hours. This means that even if the current allowance for on-street parking is reduced by roughly one-third (from 158 to 96), there is still almost TWICE as much space for on-street car parking as is realistically City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6b) Title: MSA Rehabilitation Project - Texas Ave. - Project No. 4017-1101 Page 23 3 needed at any given time (almost 100 spaces for approximately 50 cars). Again, Concept No. 2 is a plan that can satisfactorily accommodate car traffic, car parking, and bikes. § The fact that this segment of Texas Avenue has relatively high traffic volume should be considered a positive insofar as it would demonstrate the city’s commitment to improving the bike lane network. Everyone who sees these lanes, whether driving or biking, will know that the city leadership is serious about implementing the bikeway plan. Every member of this council understands that there are sound policy reasons for encouraging more people to use bikes for ordinary transportation purposes. Cities all over the country – including several of our immediate neighbors – have made real efforts towards becoming bike- friendly communities, largely out of recognition of the need to reverse the negative effects that a car-centric built environment has on the environment, the economy, public health, and the quality of life. Studies have shown that the majority of the population falls into the so-called “interested but concerned” category of persons who would like to bike more often, but don’t because they feel that the streets available to them aren’t safe to ride. Bike lanes on Texas Avenue will help us to move towards a viable, city-wide network of bikeable streets, and thereby advance the policy of encouraging people to see cycling as a realistic and attractive transportation choice. As leaders, you are aware that any proposed change to the established way of doing things – including the way we pave, stripe, and configure streets – can be expected to meet with some resistance, at least initially. In making your decision, please remain mindful of the fact that advocating for, and ultimately approving, the addition of striped bike lanes on any street where they do not currently exist, requires seeing the “big picture” and the greater public good. While you may not have heard from hundreds of residents demanding more bike lanes, you should recognize that transforming the streetscape to meet the latent demand for a more bikeable city is the right thing to do. If we are serious about improving connectivity with complete and livable streets; if we are serious about encouraging residents to make healthier and more environmentally-friendly transportation choices; and if we are serious about one day being named a “bike-friendly community,” we should start with the simple step of bike lanes City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6b) Title: MSA Rehabilitation Project - Texas Ave. - Project No. 4017-1101 Page 24 4 on Texas. This should be an easy decision, and I hope to see it implemented. I understand that this topic will be discussed at the October 17th council meeting, which I plan to attend. Best regards, City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6b) Title: MSA Rehabilitation Project - Texas Ave. - Project No. 4017-1101 Page 25 From Resident: Sent: Monday, October 03, 2016 6:05 PM To: Jake Spano <mayorjakespano@gmail.com>; Steve Hallfin <hallfinslp@gmail.com>; Thom Miller <slp.thommiller@gmail.com>; Sue Sanger <suesanger@comcast.net>; Anne Mavity <Anne@annemavity.org>; Gregg Lindberg <glindberg@stlouispark.org>; Tim Brausen <tpbrausen@gmail.com> Cc: Tom Harmening <THARMENING@stlouispark.org>; Debra Heiser <dheiser@stlouispark.org>; Joseph Shamla <jshamla@stlouispark.org>; Chris Iverson <civerson@stlouispark.org> Subject: Texas Ave changes - support Mayor and Council Members, please support either of the two staff concepts for a newly striped Texas Ave with bike lanes. Neighbors are rightly concerned about changes in front of their houses but glancing at the street shows how there's plenty of space to safely narrow both the parking and vehicle lanes. The proposed designs have no loss in utility for either neighbors or drivers and they create utility to the City on a key North/South connection by adding another transportation choice. Design the street for community goals. Narrower lanes slow traffic, helping to achieve the posted speed limit without police enforcement and they feel safer for local users. I've never biked to Knollwood on Texas because it doesn't feel safe but I would with a bike lane, especially if I could get to it via a bike lane on 28th. Thanks for your willingness to explore these ideas. Change isn't easy but if a new design on Texas Ave limits speeding and safely adds a new use to the streetscape, that's a great outcome! Texas Avenue Resident: Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 8:29 PM To: Gregg Lindberg Subject: Texas Ave Hi, I am writing to let you know that I live on Texas Ave and have concerns about the proposed changes you will be voting on in the near future. Having lived on Texas Ave since 1991, I feel qualified to put my input in re: the designs. Like you, I want to feel safe. I want to feel safe in my neighborhood. I like coming home to my house each day and want to feel safe coming and going, like you and everyone else wants. Putting bike lanes on my busy street where I have no alley, makes it a recipe for disaster. I worry about a biker getting hit and injured or even God forbid, killed by someone backing out of their driveway because there is no alley or the biker being hit by a bus. I know bikers, especially families, that avoid biking on Texas Ave now and instead bike on Rhode Island Ave which is next to parks, which is a destination for many of these bikers. Could the bike lane be put there instead as that is where most are biking anyway? Also, coming home means being able to invite family and friends over. This means they need a place to park. Please keep the parking on our street. If not, it makes for isolating and cutting people off from their social support. Please keep the speed down by putting in stop signs to slow traffic. Thank you so much for voting as if it were you that lived here with your family. Sincerely, City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6b) Title: MSA Rehabilitation Project - Texas Ave. - Project No. 4017-1101 Page 26 Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: October 17, 2016 Public Hearing Agenda Item: 6c(1) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: 2017 Budget & Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 1 and Extension of Special Service District through 2026 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Mayor to open the public hearing, take testimony, and close the public hearing. Motion to Adopt Resolution setting the 2017 Budget & Property Owner Service Charges and approve 10-year extension for Special Service District No. 1, and directing staff to certify the annual service charges to Hennepin County. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish to approve SSD No.1 budget and property owner service charges? Does the Council wish to approve a 10 year extension for SSD No. 1? SUMMARY: The 2017 proposed budgets and service charges are similar to that of past years. Staff have received the required number of signed petitions from property owners supporting extension of the District through 2026. Staff has recently held meetings with the property owners from each of the six districts and received their support for approving the 2017 budgets and service charges. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The Parks Maintenance budget will incur a service charge for the City-owned property located within this district at 3700 Monterey Drive (Recreation Center/Wolfe Park). The proposed service charge for 2017 is $23,066. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion Resolution Approving 2017 Budget and Service Charges Proposed 2017 Budget Proposed 2017 Service Charges Map Prepared by: Scott Merkley, Public Works Services Manager Reviewed by: Mark Hanson, Public Works Superintendent Cindy Walsh, Operations and Recreation Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6c(1)) Page 2 Title: 2017 Budget & Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 1 DISCUSSION BACKGROUND: History On November 6, 2006, the City Council approved a resolution imposing a multi-year service charge for Special Service District No. 1 (this district is located along Excelsior Boulevard from Quentin Avenue to Highway 100 and along Park Center Boulevard and Monterey Drive). Annually, the City Council must set a service charge for the District following a public hearing on the proposed charge. The Special Service District Property Owners Board approved the proposed 2017 budget and service charges. The notice of public hearing was published in the Sun Sailor on September 22 and October 6, 2016. The public hearing notice was sent to all property owners within the District. Special Service District No. 1 Extension The District’s 2006 multi-year service charge was for ten years expiring in 2016. Service District members have shown interest in extending the District beyond 2016. Staff sent a petition to each property owner to approve service charges commencing 2017 through and including 2026. As required by law, the City has received signed petitions from the owners of at least twenty-five percent (25%) or more of the land area of property and at least twenty-five percent (25%) of the individuals or business organizations subject to the proposed service charge. Special Service District No. 1 Financial Position Special Service District No. 1 has an anticipated 2016 year-end fund balance of approximately $74,656. Proposed 2017 Budget and Service Charges The Property Owners recommended approval of the following: 2017 budget amount of $116,663; no change from 2016. 2017 service charge amount of $86,672; no change from 2016. Generally, expenses typically do not reach 100% of budget. The expected unused budget amount along with the service charges is anticipated to allow the district to achieve the goal of a 50% fund balance which staff and board agreed should be maintained. The proposed resolution was reviewed by City Attorney, Soren Mattick. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6c(1)) Page 3 Title: 2017 Budget & Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 16 - ___ RESOLUTION APPROVING 2017 BUDGET AND SERVICE CHARGES FOR SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT NO. 1 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. Recitals: Findings. 1.01 In 1996, pursuant to Ordinance No. 2067-96, the City created a special service district for certain property located with an area approximately bounded on the south by Excelsior Boulevard, on the north by 36th Street, on the west by Highway 100 and on the east by Natchez Avenue South. The specific properties included within this area are identified on Exhibit “A” attached hereto and generally depicted on Exhibit “B” hereto and the right-of-way adjacent thereto (the “District”). The City by Resolution 96-87 also adopted a multi-year service charge through and including the year 2006. 1.02 The City has received a petition to impose a new multi-year service charge for 2007 and through and including the year 2016 from the owners of property within the District (the "Petition"). The City by Resolution 06-167 also adopted a multi-year service charge through and including the year 2016. 1.03 The City has received a petition to impose a new multi-year service charge for 2017 and through and including the year 2026 from the owners of property within the District (the "Petition"). 1.04 The City Council has determined each of the following: (a) the owners of at least twenty-five percent (25%) or more of the land area within the District have signed the Petition; (b) at least twenty-five percent (25%) of the individuals or business organizations subject to the proposed service charge have signed the Petition; (c) only owners of property located within the District have signed the Petition; (d) only owners of property classified under Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.13 as commercial, industrial, or public utility purposes, or that is vacant land zoned or designated on a land use plan for commercial, industrial, or public utility purposes, have signed the Petition; and (e) notice of a public hearing has been given and a public hearing has been held. Section 2. Adoption of 2017 Budget 2.01 2017 Budget. The 2007 Budget for Special Service District No. 1 of $116,663 is hereby approved as recommended by the Special Service District No. 1 Property Owners. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6c(1)) Page 4 Title: 2017 Budget & Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 1 2.02 Authorized 2017 Service Charge. The authorized 2017 Service Charge for Special Service District No. 1 is $116,663 is hereby approved as recommended by the Special Service District No. 1 Property Owners and attached to this Resolution. A portion of the service charge will be paid from the District’s reserves. Section 3. Imposition of Service Charge. 3.01 Amount of Service Charge. There is hereby imposed a service charge in the amounts and against the properties specified on the Exhibit attached hereto (the "Service Charge"). 3.02 Multi-year Service Charge. The Service Charge imposed by this resolution is a charge for more than one year. The Service Charge will remain in effect through and including the year 2026 for taxes payable in said year. Exhibit "A" specifies the maximum cost of any improvement to be paid for in whole or in part by the Service Charge, if any; the maximum cost of operating and maintaining the improvements during the first year and upon completion of the improvements; the proposed method and source of financing the improvements; and the maximum cost of operating and maintaining the improvements. The maximum service charge imposed in any year will be adjusted as provided in Section 3.04. 3.03 Calculation of Service Charge. The Service Charge for services related to the removal of snow and ice shall be distributed based upon the front feet of sidewalk for each parcel in the District. The Service Charge for all other costs shall be distributed based upon the area (square feet) of each parcel within the District and subject to the Service Charge. 3.04 Inflation Adjuster. The maximum service charge to be imposed in any year (the "Current Year") will increase from the maximum authorized budgeted amount for the year immediately preceding the Current Year (the "Prior Year") based upon the following: The Consumer Price Index (All Items) for the Minneapolis/St. Paul Metropolitan Area, published by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics ("Index"), which is published for the date nearest the commencement of the Current Year (the "Current Year Index"), shall be compared with the Index published for the date nearest the commencement of the Prior Year (the "Prior Year Index"). If the Current Year Index has increased over the Prior Year Index, the Service Charge shall be increased by multiplying the Service Charge by a fraction, the numerator of which is the Current Year Index and the denominator of which is the Prior Year Index. If the Index is discontinued or revised, such other government index or computation with which it is replaced shall be used in order to obtain substantially the same result as would be obtained if the Index had not been discontinued or revised. Notwithstanding increases in the Index of greater than five percent (5%), the Service Charge shall not increase from any Prior Year to any Current Year by an amount greater than five percent (5%) of the Prior Years’ Service Charge. 3.05 Distribution of Total Service Charge. The distribution of the total Service Charge among properties within the District and subject to the Service Charge may vary and shall be recalculated pursuant to the formula specified in Section 3.03 if and to the extent that: (i) the front footage of sidewalks constructed on such properties increases or decreases; or (ii) a parcel increases or decreases in size by acquisition or sale. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6c(1)) Page 5 Title: 2017 Budget & Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 1 Section 4. Collection of Service Charges. 4.01 Collection. The Services Charges shall be payable and collected at the same time and in the same manner as provided for payment and collection of ad valorem taxes. For purposes of determining the appropriate tax rate, taxable property or net tax capacity shall be determined without regard to captured or original net tax capacity under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177 or to the distribution or contribution value under Minnesota Statutes, Section 473F.08. 4.02 Penalty and Interest. Service Charges made payable in the same manner as provided for payment and collection of ad valorem taxes, if not paid on or before the applicable due date, shall be subject to the same penalty and interest as in the case of ad valorem tax amounts not paid by the respective date. 4.03 Due Date. The due date for the Service Charge payable in the same manner as ad valorem taxes is the due date given in law for the real or personal property tax for the property on which the service charge is imposed. Service Charges imposed on net tax capacity which are to become payable in the following year must be certified to the County Auditor by the date provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.061, Subd. 3 for annual certification of special assessment installments. Section 5. Revenue Surplus. To the extent that the total of Service Charges collected exceed the cost of services rendered within the District, at the election of the City, either: (i) such excess amount shall be held as a reserve to pay the cost of future services provided under this resolution; or (ii) the next year's levy of taxes and service charges shall be decreased by a corresponding amount. Section 6. Recording. The City may record this Resolution against parcels located within the District and subject to the Service Charge for the purpose of providing notice of the Service Charge to prospective purchasers of such parcels. Section 7. Effective Date. This Resolution shall be effective on the forty-fifth (45th) day following adoption, which effective date shall be December 1, 2016. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council October 17, 2016 City Manager Mayor Attest: City Clerk Object Account 2016 Final Budget 2017 Proposed Budget EXPENDITURES SUPPLIES 6212 - General Supplies 1,064 713 6224 - Landscaping Materials 10,000 9,000 6210 - SUPPLIES 11,064 9,713 NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 6303 - Other 2,500 2,500 6303 - SSD -Banner replacements 300 300 2,800 2,800 SERVICES & OTHER CHARGES 6550 - SSD Civil 0 150 6410 - SSD Mgmt Services 4,500 4,500 6630 - SSD - snow removal 49,000 47,000 6630 - SSD - Banner install/removal 1,500 1,500 6630 - SSD - Irrigation services 5,000 5,000 6630 - SSD decorative install/maint 10,000 10,000 6630 - SSD - Landscape services 26,000 27,000 POSTAGE 6950 - Legal Notices 150 150 BUSINESS INSURANCE 7106 - Public Liability Insurance 149 150 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 7207 - SSD infrastructure repair 4,500 6,500 UTILITIES 7301 - Electric Services 2,000 2,200 6350 - SERVICES & OTHER CHARGES 102,799 104,150 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 116,663 116,663 SSD #1 Budget City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6c(1)) Title: 2017 Budget & Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 1 Page 6 CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK Attachment A Special Service District #1 Estimated Annual Cost Per Parcel Proposed 2017 Service Charge PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL 2017 2016 2015 PID No.Address Business SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE CHARGE CHARGE CHARGE 06-028-24-33-0019 3601 Park Center Boulevard E.J. Plesko & Assoc., Inc.$4,268 $4,322 $4,317 06-028-24-33-0015 3601 State Hwy No 100 South Target Corporation t‐0260 $9,281 $9,355 $9,348 06-028-24-34-0022 3700 Monterey Drive City of St. Louis Park $23,066 $22,775 $22,802 06-028-24-33-0014 3777 Park Center Boulevard Lund Food Holdings $9,794 $9,822 $9,820 07-028-24-22-0031 3800 Park Nicollet Boulevard Park Nicollet Health Services $5,137 $4,990 $5,003 07-028-24-22-0031 3800 Park Nicollet Boulevard Park Nicollet Health Services $1,140 $1,108 $1,111 07-028-24-22-0035 3900 Park Nicollet Boulevard Park Nicollet Health Services $3,625 $3,694 $3,687 07-028-24-21-0004 4916 Excelsior Boulevard Park Nicollet Health Services $599 $603 $602 07-028-24-21-0005 4920 Excelsior Boulevard Park Nicollet Health Services $405 $407 $407 07-028-24-21-0006 4950 Excelsior Boulevard Zip Printing $484 $493 $492 07-028-24-21-0512 4951 Excelsior Boulevard Park Nicollet Health Services $2,689 $2,772 $3,904 07-028-24-21-0513 4959 Excelsior Boulevard Frauenshuh Companies $1,145 $1,139 $1,139 07-028-24-22-0023 4961 Excelsior Boulevard Intercity Investments, Inc.$555 $556 $556 07-028-24-22-0024 4995 Excelsior Boulevard Intercity Investments, Inc.$750 $747 $748 07-028-24-22-0032 5000 Excelsior Boulevard Park Nicollet Health Services $671 $675 $675 07-028-24-22-0025 5001 Excelsior Boulevard Intercity Investments, Inc.$516 $517 $517 07-028-24-22-0033 5050 Excelsior Boulevard Park Nicollet Health Services $3,003 $3,005 $3,004 07-028-24-22-0034 5100 Excelsior Boulevard Park Nicollet Health Services $1,702 $1,688 $1,690 07-028-24-22-0037 5200 Excelsior Boulevard McDonald's $1,186 $1,213 $1,210 07-028-24-22-0026 5201 Excelsior Boulevard Intercity Investments, Inc.$6,689 $6,712 $6,710 07-028-24-22-0036 5300 Excelsior Boulevard Tower Pl. c/o Frauenshuh Companies $5,256 $5,320 $5,314 07-028-24-22-0004 5400 Auto Club Way AAA Minneapolis $4,711 $4,759 $4,755 TOTALS: $86,672 $86,672 $86,672 Notes: 1) 2) 3)The 2017 proposed service charge includes a transfer of approximately $30,000 from reserves to lower the service charge and maintain a proper fund balance. The proposed 2017 service charge calculations are based upon the same methodology / formulas used for the initial service charge collection. a) Commercial sidewalk snow removal charges are on a front footage basis. b) All other services charges are based on the parcel's square foot area basis. The 2017 proposed budget is $116,663, the same as in 2016. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6c(1)) Title: 2017 Budget & Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 1 Page 7 ZARTHANAVESSERVICERDGRANDWAY KIPLINGAVESRALEIGHAVESPA R K C E N T E R B L V D NATCHEZAVES40TH L N WWEBSTER AVE SWEBSTERAVESOTTAWAAVESRAL E I GHAV E S MONTEREYAVESAUTO CLUB WAYWEBSTER AVE S35TH ST W 39 T H S TW LYNNAVES361/2 STW V A L LA C H E R A V E PRI NCET ONAVESMERI DI ANL NPARKNICOLL ET BLVD36TH ST W 36TH ST W WO O D D A L E A V E SYOSEMITE AVE S W O O D D A L E A V E S XENWOODAVESPA R K C O MM O N S D R JOPPAAVESW O L F E PKWYPARKCENTERBLVDYOSEMITE AVE SPARKCENTERBLVDQUENTI NAVESM O N TE R E Y D R 36TH ST W LYNNAVES40TH ST WPRINCE T ONL NHU N T INGTONAVESXENWOODAVESE X C E LS IO R B LV D 3700 3800 3777 3601 5201 3900 5300 5400 5050 4951 3601 3633 5100 5200 3800 4995 4916 4961 5001 4920 50004950 Special Service District No. 1 West 36th Street, Park Center Boulevard, and Excelsior Boulevard Legend Sidewalk Snow Removal SSD 1 Parcels ± 8/13/2013 pcw City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6c(1)) Title: 2017 Budget & Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 1 Page 8 Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: October 17, 2016 Public Hearing Agenda Item: 6c(2) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: 2017 Budget & Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 2 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Mayor to open the public hearing, take testimony, and then close the public hearing. Motion to Adopt Resolution setting the 2017 Budget and Property Owner Service Charge for Special Service District No. 2 and directing staff to certify the annual service charges to Hennepin County. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish to approve SSD No.2 budget and property owner service charges? SUMMARY: The 2017 proposed budgets and service charges are very similar to that of past years. Staff has recently held meetings with the property owners from each of the six districts and received their support for approving the 2017 budget and service charges. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The Public Works Operations Division budget will incur a service charge for the City-owned property located within this district at 3929 Excelsior Boulevard (bus shelter). The proposed service charge for 2016 is $49. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion Resolution Approving 2017 Budget and Service Charges Proposed 2017 Budget Proposed 2017 Service Charges Map Prepared by: Scott Merkley, Public Works Services Manager Reviewed by: Mark Hanson, Public Works Superintendent Cindy Walsh, Operations and Recreation Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6c(2)) Page 2 Title: 2017 Budget & Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 2 DISCUSSION BACKGROUND: History On October 20, 2008, the City Council approved a resolution imposing a multi-year service charge for Special Service District No. 2 (this district is located along Excelsior Boulevard from Monterey Drive/38th Street to France Avenue). Annually, the City Council must set a service charge for the District following a public hearing on the proposed charge. The Special Service District Property Owners approved the proposed 2017 budget and service charges. The notice of public hearing was published in the Sun Sailor on September 22 and October 6, 2016. The public hearing notice was sent to all property owners within the District. Special Service District No. 2 Financial Position Special Service District No. 2 has an anticipated year-end fund balance of approximately $29,969. Proposed 2017 Budget and Service Charges The Property Owners recommended approval of the following: 2017 budget amount of $47,464; no change from 2016. 2017 service charge amount of $36,464; no change from 2016. Generally, expenses typically do not reach 100% of budget. The expected unused budget amount along with the service charges is anticipated to allow the district to achieve the goal of a 50% fund balance which staff and board agreed should be maintained. The proposed resolution was reviewed by City Attorney, Soren Mattick. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6c(2)) Page 3 Title: 2017 Budget & Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 2 RESOLUTION NO. 16 - ___ RESOLUTION APPROVING 2017 BUDGET AND SERVICE CHARGES FOR SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT NO. 2 WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance No. 2093-97, the City Council created Special Service District No. 2 (the “District”). The specific properties located within the District are identified on Attachment “A” attached hereto; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 08-133, the City Council is authorized to impose service charges within the District on a multi-year basis through and including the year 2018 for taxes payable in said year; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 2.04 of Resolution No. 08-133, the maximum budget to be imposed in any year will be subject to adjustment calculations based on Consumer Price Index (CPI) data for the Minneapolis/St. Paul Metropolitan Area; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 3 of Resolution No. 08-133, the Service Charges shall be payable and collected at the same time and in the same manner as provided for payment and collection of ad valorem taxes; and WHEREAS, the City is required by Statute to certify assessments to the County by December 1, 2016. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park as follows: 1. The 2017 Budget for Special Service District No. 2 of $47,464 is hereby approved as recommended by the Special Service District No. 2 Property Owners. 2. The authorized 2017 Service Charge for Special Service District No. 2 is $36,464 in the amounts and against the properties specified on Attachment “A” attached to this Resolution. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council October 17, 2016 City Manager Mayor Attest: City Clerk Object Account 2016 Final Budget 2017 Proposed Budget EXPENDITURES SUPPLIES 6212 - General Supplies 252 257 6224 - Landscaping Materials 5,500 4,500 6210 - SUPPLIES 5,752 4,757 NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 6303 - Other 1,500 1,500 6303 - SSD -Banner replacements 0 0 1,500 1,500 SERVICES & OTHER CHARGES 6410 - SSD Mgmt Services 2,000 2,000 6630 - SSD - Banner install/removal 1,000 800 6630 - SSD - Irrigation services 3,000 4,000 6630 - SSD decorative install/maint 8,000 8,000 6630 - SSD - Landscape services 17,500 18,500 POSTAGE 6950 - Legal Notices 154 150 BUSINESS INSURANCE 7106 - Public Liability Insurance 58 57 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 7207 - SSD infrastructure repair 6,500 5,500 UTILITIES 7301 - Electric Services 2,000 2,200 6350 - SERVICES & OTHER CHARGES 40,212 41,207 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 47,464 47,464 SSD #2 Budget City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6c(2)) Title: 2017 Budget & Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 2 Page 4 CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK Attachment A Special Service District #2 Estimated Annual Cost Per Parcel Proposed 2017 Service Charge PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL 2017 2016 2015 SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE PID No.Business CHARGE CHARGE CHARGE 06-028-24-41-0075 3900 Excelsior Blvd Ellipse on Excelsior LLC $3,756 $3,756 $4,890 06-028-24-41-0077 3901 Excelsior Blvd Alberto Properties LLP $1,901 $1,901 $2,474 06-028-24-41-0076 3924 Excelsior Blvd Ellipse on Excelsior LLC $2,107 $2,107 $2,742 06-028-24-41-0068 3925 Excelsior Blvd A & A Agency Inc. $773 $773 $1,006 06-028-24-41-0067 3929 Excelsior Blvd City of St. Louis Park $49 $49 $63 06-028-24-41-0014 3939 Excelsior Blvd Sara Son LLC $1,048 $1,048 $1,364 06-028-24-41-0070 3947 Excelsior Blvd KMS Management $1,735 $1,735 $2,258 06-028-24-41-0008 4100 Excelsior Blvd Sela Roofing & Remodeling $1,223 $1,223 $1,592 06-028-24-41-0009 4120 Excelsior Blvd Baldwin & Matteson Prop. LLC $1,252 $1,252 $1,630 06-028-24-44-0001 4140 Excelsior Blvd Larson Enterprises $2,165 $2,165 $2,819 06-028-24-44-0176 4170 Excelsior Blvd 4150 Excelsior Blvd. Partnership $1,739 $1,739 $2,264 06-028-24-44-0175 4200 Excelsior Blvd Stranik Six LLC $1,428 $1,428 $1,859 06-028-24-44-0173 4201 Excelsior Blvd Life Medical $2,107 $2,107 $2,742 06-028-24-44-0088 4221 Excelsior Blvd Prima Investments LLC $359 $359 $467 06-028-24-43-0017 4300 Excelsior Blvd Lyndly F Opitz & Assoc $561 $561 $730 06-028-24-43-0020 4301 Excelsior Blvd S & S Investments $1,253 $1,253 $1,632 06-028-24-43-0018 4306 Excelsior Blvd Lyndly F Opitz & Assoc $480 $480 $625 06-028-24-43-0019 4308 Excelsior Blvd Lyndly F Opitz & Assoc $662 $662 $861 06-028-24-43-0021 4317 Excelsior Blvd Habitation Furnishing & Design $744 $744 $968 06-028-24-43-0186 4320 Excelsior Blvd Lyndly F Opitz & Assoc $1,855 $1,855 $2,415 06-028-24-43-0091 4331 Excelsior Blvd Bell Nelson Furniture $1,085 $1,085 $1,412 06-028-24-43-0187 4400 Excelsior Blvd Bridgewater Bancshares, Inc. $4,474 $4,474 $5,824 06-028-24-43-0040 4409 Excelsior Blvd Samfar Real Estate Inc $656 $656 $854 06-028-24-43-0041 4415 Excelsior Blvd Automotive Accessories LLC $583 $583 $758 06-028-24-43-0042 4419 Excelsior Blvd Celine Properties LLC $1,349 $1,349 $1,757 06-028-24-43-0064 4424 Excelsior Blvd Bridgewater Bank $1,120 $1,120 $1,458 TOTALS: $36,464 $36,464 $47,464 Notes: 1) 2) 3) Address The proposed 2017 service charge calculations are based upon the same methodology / formulas used for the initial service charge collection. a) All services charges are based on the parcel's square foot area basis. The 2017 proposed budget is $47,464, the same as in 2016. The 2017 proposed service charge includes a transfer of approximately $11,000 from reserves to lower the service charge and maintain a proper fund balance. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6c(2)) Title: 2017 Budget & Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 2 Page 5 GRANDWAY GLENHURSTAVEHUNTINGTONAVESINGLEWOODAVESLYNNAVES36 1/2ST W 37TH ST W MERI DI ANL N34TH S T W 36TH ST W PA R K C O MMO N S D R JOPPAAVESW O L F E PKWYBELTLINEBLVDM O N T E R E Y D R 38TH ST W HU N T INGTONAVES3900 4400 3924 4140 4201 4320 3901 3947 4170 4419 4301 4100 3939 4200 4120 4424 4331 4321 4409 3925 4308 4300 4415 4306 4221 3929 Special Service District No. 2 Excelsior Boulevard Legend SSD 2 Parcels± 9/23/2016 tw City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6c(2)) Title: 2017 Budget & Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 2 Page 6 Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: October 17, 2016 Public Hearing Agenda Item: 6c(3) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: 2017 Budget & Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 3 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Mayor to open the public hearing, take testimony, and then close the public hearing. Motion to Adopt Resolution setting the 2017 Budget and Property Owner Service Charge for Special Service District No. 3 and directing staff to certify the annual service charges to Hennepin County. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish to approve SSD No. 3 budget and property owner service charges? SUMMARY: The 2017 proposed budgets and service charges are similar to that of past years. Staff has recently held meetings with the property owners from each of the six districts and received their support for approving the 2017 budgets and service charges. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The TIF / Admin budget will incur a service charge for the City-owned property located within this district at 4790 Excelsior Boulevard (undeveloped property next to the old Bally’s Fitness). The proposed service charge for 2017 is $623. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion Resolution Approving 2017 Budget and Service Charges Proposed 2017 Budget Proposed 2017 Service Charges Map Prepared by: Scott Merkley, Public Works Services Manager Reviewed by: Mark Hanson, Public Works Superintendent Cindy Walsh, Operations and Recreation Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6c(3)) Page 2 Title: 2017 Budget & Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 3 DISCUSSION BACKGROUND: History On October 15, 2012, the City Council approved a resolution imposing a service charge for Special Service District No. 3 (located along Excelsior Boulevard from Quentin Avenue to Monterey Drive/W. 38th Street). Annually, the City Council must set a service charge for the District following a public hearing on the proposed charge. The Special Service District Property Owners approved the proposed 2017 budget and service charges. The notice of public hearing was published in the Sun Sailor on September 22 and October 6, 2016. The public hearing notice was sent to all property owners within the District. Special Service District No. 3 Financial Position Special Service District No. 3 has an anticipated year-end fund balance of approximately $39,698. Proposed 2017 Budget and Service Charges The Property Owners recommended approval of the following: 2017 budget amount of $53,597; no change from 2016 2017 service charge amount of $28,600; no change from 2016 Generally, expenses typically do not reach 100% of budget. The expected unused budget amount along with the service charges is anticipated to allow the district to achieve the goal of a 50% fund balance which staff and board agreed should be maintained. The proposed resolution was reviewed by City Attorney, Soren Mattick. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6c(3)) Page 3 Title: 2017 Budget & Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 3 RESOLUTION NO. 16 - ____ RESOLUTION APPROVING 2017 BUDGET AND SERVICE CHARGES FOR SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT NO. 3 WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance No. 2224-02, the City Council created Special Service District No. 3 (the “District”). The specific properties located within the District are identified on Attachment “A” attached hereto; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 12-149, the City Council is authorized to impose service charges within the District on a multi-year basis through and including the year 2022 for taxes payable in said year; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 2.04 of Resolution No. 12-149, the maximum budget to be imposed in any year will be subject to adjustment calculations based on Consumer Price Index (CPI) data for the Minneapolis/St. Paul Metropolitan Area; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 3 of Resolution No. 12-149, the Service Charges shall be payable and collected at the same time and in the same manner as provided for payment and collection of ad valorem taxes; and WHEREAS, the City is required by Statute to certify assessments to the County by December 1, 2016. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park as follows: 1. The 2017 Budget for Special Service District No. 3 of $53,597 is hereby approved as recommended by the Special Service District No. 3 Advisory Board. 2. The authorized 2017 Service Charge for Special Service District No. 3 is $28,600 in the amounts and against the properties specified on Attachment “A” attached to this Resolution. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council October 17, 2016 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Object Account 2016 Final Budget 2017 Proposed Budget EXPENDITURES SUPPLIES 6212 - General Supplies 500 301 6224 - Landscaping Materials 5,500 5,500 6210 - SUPPLIES 6,000 5,801 NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 6303 - Other 2,000 2,000 6303 - SSD -Banner replacements 300 300 2,300 2,300 SERVICES & OTHER CHARGES 6410 - SSD Mgmt Services 2,500 2,500 6630 - SSD - snow removal 18,000 18,000 6630 - SSD - Banner install/removal 1,000 800 6630 - SSD - Irrigation services 2,200 2,200 6630 - SSD decorative install/maint 4,500 5,000 6630 - SSD - Landscape services 12,400 12,400 POSTAGE 6950 - Legal Notices 121 120 BUSINESS INSURANCE 7106 - Public Liability Insurance 75 76 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 7207 - SSD infrastructure repair 3,001 3,000 UTILITIES 7301 - Electric Services 1,500 1,400 6350 - SERVICES & OTHER CHARGES 45,297 45,496 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 53,597 53,597 SSD #3 Budget City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6c(3)) Title: 2017 Budget & Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 3 Page 4 CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK Attachment A Special Service District #3 Estimated Annual Cost Per Parcel Proposed 2017 Service Charge Proposed Actual Actual 2017 2016 2015 PID No.Address Business Service Charge Service Charge Service Charge 06‐028‐24‐43‐0191 4500 Exc Blvd Blakely Prop & Chalen LP $2,896 $2,896 $4,555 07‐028‐24‐12‐0047 4501 Exc Blvd Honey & Rye Bakehouse $603 $603 $910 07‐028‐24‐12‐0048 4509 Exc Blvd Lang Nelson Office $1,243 $1,243 $1,871 07‐028‐24‐12‐0049 4601 Exc Blvd Park Blvd Office Bldg $1,701 $1,701 $2,592 07‐028‐24‐12‐0050 4611 Exc Blvd Core Power Yoga $846 $846 $1,290 07‐028‐24‐12‐0051 4615 Exc Blvd Judith McGrann & Friends $677 $677 $1,032 07‐028‐24‐12‐0052 4617 Exc Blvd Josephine's Taylors $907 $907 $1,382 07‐028‐24‐12‐0175 4630 Exc Blvd Excelsior & Grand, LLC $4,131 $4,131 $6,262 07‐028‐24‐21‐0009 4637 Exc Blvd Jennings Liquor $931 $931 $1,423 07‐028‐24‐21‐0011 4701 Exc Blvd Excelsior & Grand, LLC $1,272 $1,272 $1,887 07‐028‐24‐21‐0012 4725 Exc Blvd Excelsior Office Bldg.$1,962 $1,962 $2,965 07‐028‐24‐21‐0256 4730 Exc Blvd Excelsior & Grand, LLC $4,787 $4,787 $7,265 07‐028‐24‐21‐0258 4760 Exc Blvd City of St. Louis Park EDA $623 $623 $949 07‐028‐24‐21‐0252 4801 Exc Blvd Loffhagen & Son Insurance $897 $897 $1,367 07‐028‐24‐21‐0015 4811 Exc Blvd Latitudes/Laundromat/TC Gold & Silver $834 $834 $1,256 07‐028‐24‐21‐0016 4821 Exc Blvd Eastwood Properties $434 $434 $661 07‐028‐24‐21‐0017 4825 Exc Blvd Eastwood Properties $446 $446 $679 07‐028‐24‐21‐0002 4900 Exc Blvd International Fitness LLC $2,174 $2,174 $3,390 07‐028‐24‐21‐0031 4901 Exc Blvd DMM Holdings $419 $419 $631 07‐028‐24‐21‐0032 4907 Exc Blvd Tique, Inc.$406 $406 $609 07‐028‐24‐21‐0033 4911 Exc Blvd MKT Property LLC $411 $411 $624 Totals: $28,600 $28,600 $43,600 Notes: 1) a) Commercial sidewalk snow removal charges are based on the square foot of sidewalk in front of the property. 2) 3) The proposed 2017 service charge calculations are based upon the same methodology / formulas used for the initial service charge collection. b) All other services charges are based on the property's front footage. The 2017 proposed budget is $53,597, the same as in 2016. The 2017 proposed service charge includes a transfer of approximately $25,000 from reserves to lower the service charge and maintain a proper fund balance. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6c(3)) Title: 2017 Budget & Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 3 Page 5 GRANDWAYNATCHEZAVESOTTAWAAVESMONTEREYAVES39T H STWVALLACHERAVEPRI NCET ONAVESMERI DI ANL NP A R K C OM M ON S D R W O L F E PKWYM O N T E R E Y D R LYNNAVESPRI NCET ONL NE X CE LS IO R B LV D 0 4730 4630 4900 4725 4601 4509 4701 4811 4611 4501 4801 4617 4637 4615 4911 4760 3825 48214825 4907 4901 Special Service District No.3 Excelsior Boulevard Legend Sidewalk Snow Removal SSD 3 Parcels± 8/13/2013 pcw City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6c(3)) Title: 2017 Budget & Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 3 Page 6 Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: October 17, 2016 Public Hearing Agenda Item: 6c(4) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: 2017 Budget & Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 4 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Mayor to open the public hearing, take testimony, and then close the public hearing. Motion to Adopt Resolution setting the 2017 Budget and Property Owner Service Charge for Special Service District No. 4 and directing staff to certify the annual service charges to Hennepin County. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish to approve SSD No.4 budget and property owner service charges? SUMMARY: The 2017 proposed budgets and service charges are similar to that of past years. Staff has recently held meetings with the property owners from each of the six districts and received their support for approving the 2017 budgets and service charges. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The Public Works Operations budget will incur a service charge for the City-owned municipal parking lot located within this district. The proposed service charge for 2017 is $224. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion Resolution Approving 2017 Budget and Service Charges Proposed 2017 Budget Proposed 2017 Service Charges Map Prepared by: Scott Merkley, Public Works Services Manager Reviewed by: Mark Hanson, Public Works Superintendent Cindy Walsh, Operations and Recreation Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6c(4)) Page 2 Title: 2015 Budget & Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 4 DISCUSSION BACKGROUND: History On July 18, 2005, the City Council approved a resolution imposing a service charge for Special Service District No. 4 (located along Excelsior Boulevard west of Highway 100 to Louisiana Avenue). Annually, the City Council must set a service charge for the District following a public hearing on the proposed charge. The Special Service District Property Owners approved the proposed 2017 budget and service charges. The notice of public hearing was published in the Sun Sailor on September 22 and October 6, 2016. The public hearing notice was sent to all property owners within the District. Special Service District No. 4 Financial Position Special Service District No. 4 has an anticipated year-end fund balance of approximately $29,928. Proposed 2017 Budget and Service Charges The Property Owners recommended approval of the following: 2017 budget amount of $25,652; a $1,000 increase from 2016 after undertaking a detailed review of past expenditures history and expected future expenditures. 2017 service charge amount of $7,664; a $2,000 decrease from 2016 to keep the fund reserve at the desired amount. Generally, expenses typically do not reach 100% of budget. The expected unused budget amount along with the service charges is anticipated to allow the district to achieve the goal of a 50% fund balance which staff and board agreed should be maintained. The proposed resolution was reviewed by City Attorney, Soren Mattick. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6c(4)) Page 3 Title: 2015 Budget & Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 4 RESOLUTION NO. 16 - ___ RESOLUTION APPROVING 2017 BUDGET AND SERVICE CHARGES FOR SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT NO. 4 WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance No. 2298-05, the City Council created Special Service District No. 4 (the “District”). The specific properties located within the District are identified on Attachment “A” attached hereto; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 15-148, the City Council is authorized to impose service charges within the District on a multi-year basis through and including the year 2025 for taxes payable in said year; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 2.04 of Resolution No. 05-100, the maximum budget to be imposed in any year will be subject to adjustment calculations based on Consumer Price Index (CPI) data for the Minneapolis/St. Paul Metropolitan Area; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 3 of Resolution No. 15-148, the Service Charges shall be payable and collected at the same time and in the same manner as provided for payment and collection of ad valorem taxes; and WHEREAS, the City is required by Statute to certify assessments to the County by December 1, 2016. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park as follows: 1. The 2017 Budget for Special Service District No. 4 of $25,652 is hereby approved as recommended by the Special Service District No. 4 Advisory Board. 2. The authorized 2017 Service Charge for Special Service District No. 4 is $7,664 in the amounts and against the properties specified on Attachment “A” attached to this Resolution. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council October 17, 2016 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Object Account 2016 Final Budget 2017 Proposed Budget EXPENDITURES SUPPLIES 6212 - General Supplies 500 116 6224 - Landscaping Materials 2,500 2,500 6210 - SUPPLIES 3,000 2,616 NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 6303 - Other 700 1 6303 - SSD -Banner replacements 300 300 1,000 301 SERVICES & OTHER CHARGES 6410 - SSD Mgmt Services 2,500 2,500 6630 - SSD - Banner install/removal 1,000 800 6630 - SSD - Irrigation services 2,000 2,500 6630 - SSD decorative install/maint 2,500 2,500 6630 - SSD - Landscape services 9,500 10,500 POSTAGE 6950 - Legal Notices 116 100 BUSINESS INSURANCE 7106 - Public Liability Insurance 35 35 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 7207 - SSD infrastructure repair 2,001 1,500 UTILITIES 7301 - Electric Services 1,000 2,300 6350 - SERVICES & OTHER CHARGES 20,652 22,735 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 24,652 25,652 SSD #4 Budget City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6c(4)) Title: 2017 Budget & Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 4 Page 4 CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK Attachment A Special Service District #4 Estimated Annual Cost Per Parcel Proposed 2017 Service Charge Proposed Actual Actual 2017 2016 2015 PID No.Address Business Service Service Service Charge Charge Charge 21-117-21-24-0019 5600 Excelsior Blvd Finished Basement Company $280 $353 $535 21-117-21-24-0202 5608 Excelsior Blvd Helmut Mauer $192 $242 $367 21-117-21-24-0141 5707 Excelsior Blvd New Concepts Mgt Group $248 $313 $475 21-117-21-24-0193 5717 Excelsior Blvd LMC, Inc $326 $411 $624 21-117-21-24-0040 5720 Excelsior Blvd Holiday Stationstores Inc. $312 $393 $597 21-117-21-24-0161 5801 Excelsior Blvd MGV Holdings LLC $144 $182 $276 21-117-21-24-0066 5804 Excelsior Blvd 5804 Excelsior Blvd., LLC $176 $222 $338 21-117-21-24-0208 5809 Excelsior Blvd C.B.S. Real Est Prtnr II LLP $125 $157 $239 21-117-21-24-0067 5810 Excelsior Blvd 5812 Excelsior Blvd. Co $207 $261 $396 21-117-21-24-0209 5813 Excelsior Blvd Universal Outdoor, Inc. $18 $23 $35 21-117-21-24-0185 5825 Excelsior Blvd Kil-Ben Excelsior, LLC $368 $464 $704 21-117-21-24-0083 5900 Excelsior Blvd Realty Income Props 3 LLC $245 $309 $469 21-117-21-23-0156 5916 Excelsior Blvd Rackner & Rackner $271 $341 $518 21-117-21-23-0010 5922 Excelsior Blvd Muriel B. Frederick $52 $65 $99 21-117-21-24-0195 5925 Excelsior Blvd Suntide Commercial Realty $384 $484 $734 21-117-21-23-0011 5930 Excelsior Blvd Leonard C Riley $110 $139 $210 21-117-21-23-0097 6001 Excelsior Blvd Sew What Corporation $140 $177 $268 21-117-21-23-0127 6002 Excelsior Blvd Fitrz, Inc $155 $195 $296 21-117-21-23-0128 6006 Excelsior Blvd RRK LLC $80 $101 $154 21-117-21-23-0100 6011 Excelsior Blvd Ward Properties $290 $365 $554 21-117-21-23-0155 6100 Excelsior Blvd Laurence I Meger $112 $141 $213 21-117-21-32-0006 6111 Excelsior Blvd Full Circle Equities LLC $293 $370 $562 21-117-21-23-0130 6112 Excelsior Blvd Snyder Electric Co. $160 $202 $306 21-117-21-32-0021 6121 Excelsior Blvd Hung LLC $180 $227 $345 21-117-21-32-0022 6127 Excelsior Blvd Gregory White $146 $184 $279 6200/50 Excelsior Blvd 6200 & 6250 Excelsior Blvd $805 $1,016 $1,541 20-117-21-14-0026 6500 Excelsior Blvd Methodist Hospital $561 $708 $1,074 20-117-21-41-0009 6600 Excelsior Blvd Methodist Hospital $1,060 $1,337 $2,028 City Municipal Parking Lot City of St. Louis Park $224 $282 $428 $7,664 $9,664 $14,664 **6200 & 6250 Excelsior Blvd Charges 2017 2016 2015 21-117-21-32-0133 6200 Excelsior Blvd 101 Mark S Bloomberg $47 $59 $90 21-117-21-32-0134 6200 Excelsior Blvd 102 Charles and Janice Woodson $49 $62 $94 21-117-21-32-0135 6200 Excelsior Blvd 103 Laurie G Holasek $47 $60 $91 21-117-21-32-0136 6200 Excelsior Blvd 104 Laurie G Holasek $53 $67 $102 21-117-21-32-0137 6200 Excelsior Blvd 201 Dennis and Lois Schlutter $45 $57 $87 21-117-21-32-0138 6200 Excelsior Blvd 202 Dennis and Lois Schlutter $48 $60 $91 21-117-21-32-0139 6200 Excelsior Blvd 203 Unite Rope Holland Dist $62 $79 $119 21-117-21-32-0140 6200 Excelsior Blvd 204 Dennis and Lois Schlutter $55 $69 $105 21-117-21-32-0141 6250 Excelsior Blvd 101 Nemer Fieger & Assoc Inc $50 $64 $96 21-117-21-32-0142 6250 Excelsior Blvd 102 Lgh Properties LLC $47 $59 $89 21-117-21-32-0143 6250 Excelsior Blvd 103 Donald J & Joyce E Borgen $51 $64 $98 21-117-21-32-0144 6250 Excelsior Blvd 104 Nemer Fieger & Assoc Inc $46 $58 $88 21-117-21-32-0145 6250 Excelsior Blvd 201 James V and June M Fieger $49 $62 $94 21-117-21-32-0146 6250 Excelsior Blvd 202 Skads Travel Service Inc $44 $56 $85 21-117-21-32-0147 6250 Excelsior Blvd 203 James V and June M Fieger $65 $82 $124 21-117-21-32-0148 6250 Excelsior Blvd 204 Joseph Urista $46 $58 $88 $804 $1,541 $1,541 Notes: * 1) 2) 3) Denotes properties with a single street address but have sub-units that are independently owned. The proposed 2017 service charge calculations are based upon the same methodology / formulas used for the initial service charge collection. a) All services charges are based on the property's front footage. The 2017 proposed budget is $25,652, an increase of $1,000 from 2016. The 2017 proposed service charge includes a transfer of approximately $18,000 from reserves to lower the service charge and maintain a proper fund balance. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6c(4)) Title: 2017 Budget & Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 4 Page 5 COLORADOAVESZARTHANAVESZARTHANAVESBROOKSIDEAVEZARTHANAVESWEBSTERAVESWEBSTER AVE SALABAMAAVESWEBSTERAVESCOLORADOAVESL OUI SIA NA CIR DAKOTAAVES39TH ST W BROOKVIEW LN 39TH ST W 41ST ST W 41ST ST WEDGEWOODAVES BRUNSWICK AVE SWO O D D A L E A V E SBRUNSWICKAVES YOSEMITEAVESXENWOODAVESXENWOODAVESCAMBRIDGE ST YOSEMITE AVE SALABAMAAVES6200 - 6250 6500 06600 5825 5916 5925 6011 6111 5720 5707 5717 5600 5900 5608 5804 6121 5801 5810 5809 6002 6112 6127 5930 6100 6001 6006 5922 6100 5813 Special Service District No.4 Excelsior Boulevard Legend SSD 4 Parcels± 9/3/2015 pcw City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6c(4)) Title: 2017 Budget & Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 4 Page 6 Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: October 17, 2016 Public Hearing Agenda Item: 6c(5) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: 2017 Budget & Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 5 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Mayor to open the public hearing, take testimony, and then close the public hearing. Motion to Adopt Resolution setting the 2017 Budget and Property Owner Service Charge for Special Service District No. 5 and directing staff to certify the annual service charges to Hennepin County. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish to approve SSD No. 5 budget and property owner service charges? SUMMARY: The 2017 proposed budgets and service charges are very similar to that of past years. Staff has recently held meetings with the property owners from each of the six districts and received their support for approving the 2017 budgets and service charges. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: None. There are no City owned properties within this district. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion Resolution Approving 2017 Budget and Service Charges Proposed 2017 Budget Proposed 2017 Service Charges Map Prepared by: Scott Merkley, Public Works Services Manager Reviewed by: Mark Hanson, Public Works Superintendent Cindy Walsh, Operations and Recreation Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6c(5)) Page 2 Title: 2017 Budget & Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 5 DISCUSSION BACKGROUND: History On February 2, 2009, the City Council approved a resolution imposing a service charge for Special Service District No. 5 (located along Park Place Boulevard between I-394 and Cedar Lake Road). Annually, the City Council must set a service charge for the District following a public hearing on the proposed charge. The Special Service District Property Owners approved the proposed 2016 budget and service charges. The notice of public hearing was published in the Sun Sailor on September 22 and October 6, 2016. The public hearing notice was sent to all property owners within the District. Special Service District No. 5 Financial Position Special Service District No. 5 has an anticipated year-end fund balance of approximately $7,724. Proposed 2017 Budget and Service Charges The Property Owners recommended approval of the following: 2017 budget amount of $28,498; an increase of $1,300 from 2016 after a detailed review of past expenditures and anticipated future expenditures. 2017 service charge amount of $22,198; a $3,500 increase from 2016 to keep the fund reserve at the desired amount. Generally, expenses typically do not reach 100% of budget. The expected unused budget amount along with the service charges is anticipated to allow the district to achieve the goal of a 50% fund balance which staff and board agreed should be maintained. The proposed resolution was reviewed by City Attorney, Soren Mattick. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6c(5)) Page 3 Title: 2017 Budget & Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 5 RESOLUTION NO. 16-____ RESOLUTION APPROVING 2017 BUDGET AND SERVICE CHARGES FOR SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT NO. 5 WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance No. 2371-09, the City Council created Special Service District No. 5 (the “District”). The specific properties located within the District are identified on Attachment “A” attached hereto; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 09-021, the City Council is authorized to impose service charges within the District on a multi-year basis through and including the year 2019 for taxes payable in said year; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 2.04 of Resolution No. 09-021, the maximum budget to be imposed in any year will be subject to adjustment calculations based on Consumer Price Index (CPI) data for the Minneapolis/St. Paul Metropolitan Area; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 3 of Resolution No. 09-021, the Service Charges shall be payable and collected at the same time and in the same manner as provided for payment and collection of ad valorem taxes; and WHEREAS, the City is required by Statute to certify assessments to the County by December 1, 2016. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park as follows: 1. The 2017 Budget for Special Service District No. 5 of $28,498 is hereby approved as recommended by the Special Service District No. 5 Property Owners. 2. The authorized 2017 Service Charge for Special Service District No. 5 is $22,198 in the amounts and against the properties specified on Attachment “A” attached to this Resolution. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council October 17, 2016 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Object Account 2016 Final Budget 2017 Proposed Budget EXPENDITURES SUPPLIES 6212 - General Supplies 500 113 6224 - Landscaping Materials 4,000 3,000 6210 - SUPPLIES 4,500 3,113 NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 6303 - Other 1,000 900 6303 - SSD -Banner replacements 100 1 1,100 901 SERVICES & OTHER CHARGES 6410 - SSD Mgmt Services 3,250 3,250 6630 - SSD - Banner install/removal 1,000 2,000 6630 - SSD - Irrigation services 1,500 2,500 6630 - SSD decorative install/maint 3,200 3,200 6630 - SSD - Landscape services 11,000 11,000 POSTAGE 6950 - Legal Notices 114 100 BUSINESS INSURANCE 7106 - Public Liability Insurance 32 32 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 7207 - SSD infrastructure repair 302 902 UTILITIES 7301 - Electric Services 1,200 1,500 6350 - SERVICES & OTHER CHARGES 21,598 24,484 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 27,198 28,498 SSD #5 Budget City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6c(5)) Title: 2017 Budget & Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 5 Page 4 CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK Attachment A Special Service District #5 Estimated Annual Cost Per Parcel Proposed 2017 Service Charge Proposed Actual Actual PID No.Address Business 2017 2016 2015 Service Charge Service Charge Service Charge 04‐117‐21‐31‐0019 1500 Park Place Blvd Doubletree Hotel $5,026 $4,234 $4,234 30‐029‐24‐33‐0031 1600 West End Blvd Shops at West End $2,715 $2,287 $2,287 04‐117‐21‐34‐0046 1620 Park Place Blvd Inland Real Estate Corp $882 $743 $743 04‐117‐21‐34‐0045 1650 Park Place Blvd Inland Real Estate Corp $973 $820 $820 04‐117‐21‐34‐0044 1690 Park Place Blvd James & Patricia Oslund $792 $667 $667 04‐117‐21‐34‐0049 1700 Park Place Blvd Costco Wholesale $694 $584 $584 30‐029‐24‐32‐0022 5320 16th St. W.Cub Foods $792 $667 $667 30‐029‐24‐32‐0026 5353 Wayzata Blvd Bellwether Enterprise RE Cap $1,753 $1,477 $1,477 30‐029‐24‐33‐0011 5401 Gamble Dr The Excelsior Group $1,550 $1,305 $1,305 30‐029‐24‐33‐0015 5402 Parkdale Dr The Excelsior Group $2,801 $2,360 $2,360 04‐117‐21‐34‐0043 5600 Cedar Lake Rd Inland Real Estate Corp $1,799 $1,515 $1,515 04‐117‐21‐34‐0050 5601 16th St W Inland Ryan LLC $679 $572 $572 04‐117‐21‐31‐0018 5657 Wayzata Blvd KK Corporation $856 $721 $721 04‐117‐21‐34‐0047 5699 16th St W Inland Real Estate Corp $886 $746 $746 $22,198 $18,698 $18,698 Notes: 1) 2) 3) The proposed 2017 service charge calculations are based upon the same methodology / formulas used for the initial service charge collection. a) All services charges are based on the property's front footage. The 2017 proposed budget is $28,498, an increase of $1,300 from 2016. The 2017 proposed service charge includes a transfer of approximately $6,000 from reserves to lower the service charge and maintain a proper fund balance. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6c(5)) Title: 2017 Budget & Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 5 Page 5 RIDGEDRPARKPLACEBLVDSPRINCETONAVESALABAMAAVESRIDGEDR16TH ST W OLD CEDAR L A K E R D P A R K D A L E D RPARKPLACEBLVDSCEDARLAKERDS CEDARLAKERDSCEDARLAKERDSZARTHANAVES QUENTINAVESGA MBLE DR WAYZ ATA B LVD 16TH ST W WESTENDBLVDDUKEDRUTICAAVES1600 5600 1500 5320 5353 5401 5402 5601 1700 1650 5657 1690 5699 1620 Special Service District No.5 Park Place Boulevard Legend SSD 5 Parcels± 8/13/2013 pcw City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6c(5)) Title: 2017 Budget & Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 5 Page 6 Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: October 17, 2016 Public Hearing Agenda Item: 6c(6) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: 2017 Budget & Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 6 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Mayor to open the public hearing, take testimony, and then close the public hearing. Motion to Adopt Resolution setting the 2017 Budget and Property Owner Service Charge for Special Service District No. 6 and directing staff to certify the annual service charges to Hennepin County. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish to approve SSD No. 6 budget and property owner service charges? SUMMARY: The 2017 proposed budgets and service charges are similar to that of past years. Staff has recently held meetings with the property owners from each of the six districts and received their support for approving the 2017 budgets and service charges. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The TIF / Admin budget will incur a service charge for the three city-owned undeveloped properties located within this district. The proposed service charge for 2017 is $1,755. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion Resolution Approving 2017 Budget and Service Charges Proposed 2017 Budget Proposed 2017 Service Charges Map Prepared by: Scott Merkley, Public Works Services Manager Reviewed by: Mark Hanson, Public Works Superintendent Cindy Walsh, Operations and Recreation Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6c(6)) Page 2 Title: 2017 Budget & Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 6 DISCUSSION BACKGROUND: History On June 15, 2009, the City Council approved a resolution imposing a service charge for Special Service District No. 6 (located along 36th Street W. from Wooddale Avenue to Highway 100). Annually, the City Council must set a service charge for the District following a public hearing on the proposed charge. The Special Service District Property Owners approved the proposed 2017 budget and service charges. The notice of public hearing was published in the Sun Sailor on September 22 and October 6, 2016. The public hearing notice was sent to all property owners within the District. Special Service District No. 6 Financial Position Special Service District No. 6 has an anticipated year-end fund balance of approximately $10,161. Proposed 2017 Budget and Service Charges The Property Owners recommended approval of the following: 2017 budget amount of $25,155; no change from 2016. 2017 service charge amount of $19,155; an increase of $2,000 from 2016 to address landscape replacement, irrigation costs and to increase the fund balance reserve. Generally, expenses typically do not reach 100% of budget. The expected unused budget amount along with the service charges is anticipated to allow the district to achieve the goal of a 50% fund balance which staff and board agreed should be maintained. The proposed resolution was reviewed by City Attorney, Soren Mattick. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6c(6)) Page 3 Title: 2017 Budget & Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 6 RESOLUTION NO. 16 - ____ RESOLUTION APPROVING 2017 BUDGET AND SERVICE CHARGES FOR SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT NO. 6 WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance No. 2374-09, the City Council created Special Service District No. 6 (the “District”). The specific properties located within the District are identified on Attachment “A” attached hereto; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 09-078, the City Council is authorized to impose service charges within the District on a multi-year basis through and including the year 2019 for taxes payable in said year; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 2.04 of Resolution No. 09-078, the maximum budget to be imposed in any year will be subject to adjustment calculations based on Consumer Price Index (CPI) data for the Minneapolis/St. Paul Metropolitan Area; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 3 of Resolution No. 09-078, the Service Charges shall be payable and collected at the same time and in the same manner as provided for payment and collection of ad valorem taxes; and WHEREAS, the City is required by Statute to certify assessments to the County by December 1, 2016. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park as follows: 1. The 2017 Budget for Special Service District No. 6 of $25,155 is hereby approved as recommended by the Special Service District No. 6 Property Owners. 2. The authorized 2017 Service Charge for Special Service District No. 6 is $19,155 in the amounts and against the properties specified on Attachment “A” attached to this Resolution. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council October 17, 2016 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Object Account 2016 Existing Budget 2017 Proposed Budget EXPENDITURES SUPPLIES 6212 - General Supplies 150 149 6224 - Landscaping Materials 5,500 5,500 6210 - SUPPLIES 5,650 5,649 NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 6303 - Other 2,000 500 2,000 500 SERVICES & OTHER CHARGES 6410 - SSD Mgmt Services 2,500 2,500 6630 - SSD - Site Maintenance 1,000 1,000 6630 - SSD - Irrigation services 2,000 2,500 6630 - SSD decorative install/maint 9,700 9,700 6630 - SSD - Landscape services POSTAGE 6950 - Legal Notices 74 75 BUSINESS INSURANCE 7106 - Public Liability Insurance 30 30 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 7207 - SSD infrastructure repair 2,201 2,201 UTILITIES 7301 - Electric Services 1,000 6350 - SERVICES & OTHER CHARGES 17,505 19,006 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 25,155 25,155 SSD #6 Budget City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6c(6)) Title: 2017 Budget & Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 6 Page 4 CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK Attachment A Special Service District #6 Estimated Annual Cost Per Parcel Proposed 2017 Service Charge Proposed Actual Actual PID No.Address Business 2017 2016 2015 Service Charge Service Charge Service Charge 16‐117‐21‐34‐0024 3575 Wooddale Ave City of St. Louis Park $585 $524 $402 16‐117‐21‐34‐0607 3601 Wooddale Ave TowerLight Senior Living $3,315 $2,969 $2,277 16‐117‐21‐34‐0015 5500 36th St. W.SLMB LLC $425 $381 $292 16‐117‐21‐34‐0355 5600 36th St W Tammy Medina c/o KAMI Inc $3,103 $2,778 $2,130 16‐117‐21‐34‐0073 5605 36th St W 36th Street LLC $2,952 $2,644 $2,027 16‐117‐21‐34‐0072 5701 36th St W M A Lerner & S O Lerner $1,108 $992 $761 16‐117‐21‐34‐0040 5708 36th St W Standal Properties Inc $1,755 $1,572 $1,205 16‐117‐21‐34‐0071 5718 36th St W M A Lerner & S O Lerner $585 $524 $402 16‐117‐21‐34‐0077 5721 36th St W Thermetic Products $1,232 $1,103 $846 16‐117‐21‐34‐0038 5724 36th St W LRJ of Minnesota Ltd Partnership $585 $524 $402 16‐117‐21‐34‐0046 5727 36th St W R & SA Investment LLC $585 $524 $402 16‐117‐21‐34‐0068 5802 36th St W Standal Properties Inc $1,755 $1,572 $1,205 16‐117‐21‐34‐0042 5814 36th St W City of St. Louis Park $585 $524 $402 16‐117‐21‐34‐0041 5816 36th St W City of St. Louis Park $585 $524 $402 $19,155 $17,155 $13,155 Notes: 1) 2) 3) The proposed 2017 service charge calculations are based upon the same methodology / formulas used for the initial service charge collection. a) All services charges are based on the property's front footage. The 2017 proposed budget is $25,155, the same as in 2016. The 2017 proposed service charge includes a transfer of approximately $6,000 from reserves to lower the service charge and maintain a proper fund balance. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6c(6)) Title: 2017 Budget & Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 6 Page 5 WEBSTER AVE S35TH ST W 36TH ST W YOSEMITEAVESW O O D D A L E A V E S XENWOODAVES3601 5802 5650 5605 5650 5708 5721 5701 3575 5816 5814 5718 5724 5727 5825 5500 Special Service District No.6 West 36th Street Legend SSD 6 Parcels ± 9/23/2016 tw City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6c(6)) Title: 2017 Budget & Property Owner Service Charges for Special Service District No. 6 Page 6 Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: October 17, 2016 Public Hearing Agenda Item: 6d EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Public Hearing to Consider First Reading of 2017 Fee Ordinance RECOMMENDED ACTION: Mayor to conduct public hearing. Motion to Approve 1st Reading of Ordinance adopting fees for 2017 and set Second Reading for November 7, 2016. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the Council agree with the proposed revisions to the fee schedule to reflect fee adjustments for programs and services called for by ordinance? SUMMARY: Each year our fees are reviewed by departments prior to renewal and as part of our budget process. Some fees must be set and adjusted in accordance with our ordinance; other fees are allowed to be set administratively. All fees are reviewed each year based on comparison to other cities in the metro area, changes in regulations and to make sure our business costs are covered for such service. At the October 10, 2016 Study Session, Council received a written report which included all proposed citywide fees for 2017. No objections were raised by the Council. Fees called for within individual provisions of the St. Louis Park City Code are to be set by ordinance and listed as Appendix A. A public hearing notice was published October 6, 2016 informing interested persons of the City’s intent to consider fees in accordance with our city code ordinance Appendix A. Next Steps: The second reading of this ordinance is scheduled for November 7, 2016. If approved, the fee increases will be effective January 1, 2017. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The proposed fee increases have been incorporated into the preliminary 2017 budget. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion Proposed Ordinance and Summary Prepared by: Mark Ebensteiner, Finance Manager Reviewed by: Tim Simon, Chief Financial Officer Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6d) Page 2 Title: Public Hearing to Consider First Reading of 2017 Fee Ordinance DISCUSSION BACKGROUND: Each Department Director has reviewed fees listed in Appendix A of the City Code. The Administrative Services Department has worked with individual departments and their recommendations are included in the attached ordinance. The Fire and Police Departments are recommending no increases in Appendix A fees for 2017. The Administrative Services, Community Development, Engineering, Inspections and Operations & Recreation Departments have each proposed fee increases, and/or additions, or removals that are the shown in Appendix A (attached). Unless otherwise noted, proposed fee increases reflect the increased administrative costs of providing services and were comparable to other cities. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ORDINANCE FEE CHANGES: Administrative Services: The administrative penalty for household trash & recycling containers blocking public way increased. The administrative penalty for snow, ice and rubbish a public nuisance on sidewalks; removal by owner was modified to clarify subsequent violations (Commercial Only). The administrative penalty for violation of sprinkling ban was increased and was modified to clarify subsequent violations. Community Development: Fees were reviewed and adjusted to cover increased costs to conduct business. Engineering: The fees for temporary no parking signs (for right-of-way permit work) and temporary use of public property increased. An additional fee is proposed related to dewatering, which commonly occurs during the construction process. The fee includes an administrative portion as well as a charge based on duration/volume of the discharge. Also, the erosion control permit was modified to increase the permit related to non-single family applicants as well as establish a deposit for both single family and other applicants. Inspections: Fees were reviewed and adjusted based on the cost to conduct business. An additional fee was added related to building mounted photovoltaic panels (i.e. solar panels). Also, an additional change established partial collection of the Building Permit plan review fee at the time of permit application as presented in the written report on October 10, 2016. Operations & Recreation: The permit related to exceeding vehicle weight limitations increased. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6d) Page 3 Title: Public Hearing to Consider First Reading of 2017 Fee Ordinance ORDINANCE NO. ____-16 ORDINANCE ADOPTING FEES FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2017 THE CITY COUNCIL OF ST. LOUIS PARK ORDAINS: Section 1. Fees called for within individual provisions of the City Code are hereby set by this ordinance for calendar year 2017. Section 2. The Fee Schedule as listed below shall be included as Appendix A of the City Code and shall replace those fees adopted October 19, 2015 by Ordinance No. 2479-15 for the calendar year 2016 which is hereby rescinded. ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTIES Chapter 4 – Animal Regulations $50 Chapter 6 – Buildings & Building Regulations Chapter 6, Article V – Property Maintenance Code $100 Chapter 8 – Business and Business Licenses $100 Chapter 12 – Environment $50 Chapter 12, Section 1 – Environment & Public Health Regulations Adopted by Reference $100 Chapter 12, Section 157 – Illicit Discharge and Connection $100 Chapter 12, Section 159 – Wetland Protection $100 Chapter 14 – Fire and Fire Prevention $50 Chapter 14, Section 75 – Open burning without permit $100 Chapter 20 – Parks and Recreation $50 Chapter 22 – Solid Waste Management $50 Chapter 22, Section 35b – Contagious Disease Refuse $200 Chapter 24 – Streets, Sidewalks & Public Places $50 Chapter 24, Section 24-43 – Household Trash & Recycling Containers blocking public way $25 $50 Chapter 24, Section 50 – Public Property: Defacing or injuring $150 Chapter 24, Section 51 – Sweeping leaves or snow into street prohibited $100 Chapter 24, Section 151 – Work in public right-of-way without a permit $100 Chapter 24-342 – Snow, ice and rubbish a public nuisance on sidewalks; removal by owner Residential $25 first time, plus $10 each subsequent offense Commercial $25 first time, Fee shall double for each subsequent violation, with a maximum fee of $200 for SFR and $400 for all others. Doesn't reset annually. Does reset for new owners. Chapter 26 – Subdivision $100 Violation of a condition associated with a Subdivision approval. $750 Chapter 32 – Utilities $50 Violation of sprinkling ban. $25 $50 first time, Fee shall double for each subsequent violation, with a maximum fee of $200 for SFR and $400 for all others. Doesn't reset annually. Does reset for new owners City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6d) Page 4 Title: Public Hearing to Consider First Reading of 2017 Fee Ordinance Chapter 36 – Zoning $50 Chapter 36, Section 37 – Conducting a Land Use not permitted in the zoning district $100 Violation of a condition associated with a Conditional Use Permit, Planned Unit Development, or Special Permit approval $750 Repeat Violations within 24 Months up to a maximum of $2,000 Double the amount of the fine imposed for the previous violation, up to a maximum of $2,000. For example, if there were four occurrences of a violation that carried a $50 fine, the fine for the fourth occurrence would be $400 (first: $50; second: $100; third: $200; fourth: $400). Fines in addition to abatement and licensing inspections Fines listed above may be in addition to fees associated with abatement and licensing inspections. CITY CLERK’S OFFICE Domestic Partnership Registration Application Fee $50 Amendment to Application Fee $25 Termination of Registration Fee $25 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Comprehensive Plan Amendments $2,050 $2,100 Conditional Use Permit $2,050 $2,100 Major Amendment $2,050 $2,100 Minor Amendment $1,050 $1,100 Fence Permit Installation $15 Numbering of Buildings (New Addresses) $50 Official Map Amendment $525 $550 Parking Lot Permit Installation/Reconstruction $75 Driveway Permit $25 Planned Unit Development Preliminary PUD $2,050 $2,100 Final PUD $2,050 $2,100 Prelim/Final PUD Combined $2,400 $3,000 PUD - Major Amendment $2,050 $2,100 PUD - Minor Amendment $1,050 $1,100 Recording Filing Fee Single Family $50 Other Uses $120 Registration of Land Use $50 Sign Permit Erection of Temporary Sign $30 Erection of Real Estate, Construction Sign 40+ ft $75 Installation of Permanent Sign without footings $75 Installation of Permanent Sign with footings $100 Special Permits Major Amendment $2,050 $2,100 Minor Amendment $1,050 $1,100 Street, Alley, Utility Vacations $800 $850 City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6d) Page 5 Title: Public Hearing to Consider First Reading of 2017 Fee Ordinance Subdivision Dedication Park Dedication (in lieu of land) Commercial/Industrial Properties 5% of current market value of the unimproved land as determined by city assessor Multi-family Dwelling Units $1,500 per dwelling unit Single-family Dwelling Units $1,500 per dwelling unit Trails $225 per residential dwelling unit Subdivisions/Replats Preliminary Plat $850 $900 plus $90 $100 per lot Final Plat $525 $550 Combined Process and Replats $950 $1,100 plus $90 $100 per lot Exempt and Administrative Subdivisions $300 $350 Temporary Use Carnival & Festival over 14 days $1,500 Mobile Use Vehicle Zoning Permit (Food or Medical) $50 Time Extension $150 Traffic Management Plan Administrative Fee $0.10 per sq ft of gross floor Tree Replacement Cash in lieu of replacement trees $135 per caliper inch Variances Commercial $500 Residential $300 Zoning Appeal $300 Zoning Letter $50 Zoning Map Amendments $2,050 $2,100 Zoning Permit Accessory Structures, 120 ft or less $25 Zoning Text Amendments $2,050 $2,100 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Installation/repair of Sidewalk, Curb Cut or Curb and Gutter Permit $12 per 10 linear feet Administrative Fee (all permits) $60 Work in Public Right-of-Way Permit Administrative Fee (all permits) $60 Hole in Roadway/Blvd (larger than 10" diameter) $60 per hole Trenching in Boulevard $200 per 100 linear feet (minimum $200) Trenching in Roadway $400 per 100 linear feet (minimum $400) Temporary No Parking Signs (for ROW permit work) $60 per hour per project Deposit of $25/sign (minimum $60 $100 per permit) Temporary Private Use of Public Property $150 $350 Dewatering Permit Administrative Fee (all permits) $250 Discharge to Sanitary Sewer Charge based on duration/volume of discharge Erosion Control Permit Application and Review – single family $200 Application and Review – other applicants $450 Deposit – single family $1,500 Deposit – other applicants $3,000 per acre (min. $1,500) City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6d) Page 6 Title: Public Hearing to Consider First Reading of 2017 Fee Ordinance False Fire Alarm Residential Commercial 1st offense $0 $0 2nd offense in same year $100 $100 3rd offense in same year $150 $200 4th offense in same year $200 $300 5th offense in same year $200 $400 Each subsequent in same year $200 $100 increase Fireworks Display Permit Actual costs incurred Service Fees Service Fee for fully-equipped & staffed vehicles $500 per hour for a ladder truck $325 per hour for a full-size fire truck $255 per hour for a rescue unit Service Fee of a Chief Officer $100 per hour After Hours Inspections $65 per hour (minimum 2 hrs.) Tent Permit Tent over 200 sq. ft. $75 Canopy over 400 sq. ft. $75 INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT Building Demolition Deposit 1 & 2 Family Residential & Accessory Structures $2,500 All Other Buildings $5,000 Building Demolition Permit 1 & 2 Family Residential & Accessory Structures $160 $170 All Other Buildings $250 $280 Building Moving Permit $500 Business Licenses Billboards $155 $160 per billboard Commercial Entertainment $285 Courtesy Bench $55 $57 Dog Kennel $155 $160 Environmental Emissions $320 Massage Therapy Establishment $350 $360 Massage Therapy License $115 Therapists holding a Massage Therapy Establishment License $35 Pawnbroker License Fee $2,000 Per Transaction Fee $2 Investigation Fee $1,000 Penalty $50 per day Sexually Oriented Business Investigation Fee (High Impact) $500 High Impact $4,500 Limited Impact $125 Tobacco Products & Related Device Sales $565 $575 Vehicle Parking Facilities Enclosed Parking $230 $235 Parking Ramp $180 $185 City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6d) Page 7 Title: Public Hearing to Consider First Reading of 2017 Fee Ordinance Certificate of Occupancy For each condominium unit completed after building occupancy $100 Change of Use (does not apply to 1 & 2 family dwellings) Up to 5,000 sq ft $450 5,001 to 25,000 sq ft $750 25,001 to 75,000 sq ft $950 $1,000 75,001 to 100,000 sq ft $1,250 $1,400 100,000 to 200,000 sq ft $1,550 $1,700 above 200,000 sq ft $1,950 $2,200 Temporary Certificate of Occupancy $80 $85 Certificate of Property Maintenance Certificate of Property Maintenance Extension $60 Change in Ownership Condominium Unit $150 Duplex (2 Family dwellings) $320 $325 Multi-Family (apartment) Buildings $255 per building + $13 $15 per unit Single Family Dwellings $230 $235 All Other Buildings: Up to 5,000 sq ft $450 5,001 to 25,000 sq ft $750 25,001 to 75,000 sq ft $950 $1,000 75,001 to 100,000 sq ft $1,250 $1,400 100,000 to 200,000 sq. ft $1,550 $1,700 above 200,000 sq. ft $1,950 $2,200 Temporary Certificate of Property Maintenance Residential $80 $85 All others $200 Construction Permits (building, electrical, fire protection, mechanical, plumbing, pools, utilities) Building and Fire Protection Permits Valuation Up to $500 Base Fee $55 $500.01 to $2,000.00 Base Fee $55 + $2 for each additional (or fraction thereof) $100 over $500.01 $2,000.01 to $25,000.00 Base Fee $85 + $15 for each additional (or fraction thereof) $1,000 over $2,000.01 $25,000.01 to $50,000.00 Base Fee $430 + $10 for each additional (or fraction thereof) $1,000 over $25,000.01 $50,000.01 to $100,000.00 Base Fee $680 + $7 for each additional (or fraction thereof) $1,000 over $50,000.01 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 Base Fee $1,030 + $6 for each additional (or fraction thereof) $1,000 over $100.000.01 $500,000.01 to $1,000,000.00 Base Fee $3,430 + $5 for each Additional (or fraction thereof) $1,000 over $500,000.01 $1,000,000.01 and up Base Fee $5,930 + $4.50 for each additional (or fraction thereof) $1,000 over $1,000,000.01 City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6d) Page 8 Title: Public Hearing to Consider First Reading of 2017 Fee Ordinance Construction Permits (cont.) Single Family Residential Exceptions: Reroofing – asphalt shingled, sloped roofs only House or House and Garage $140 Garage Only $70 Residing House or House and Garage $140 Garage Only $70 Building Mounted Photovoltaic Panels $250 Electrical Permit Installation, Replacement, Repair $50 + 1.75% of job valuation Installation of traffic signals per location $150 Single family, one appliance $50 ISTS Permit (sewage treatment system install or repair) $125 Mechanical Permit Installation, Replacement, Repair $50 $55 + 1.75% of job valuation Single Family Exceptions: Replace furnace, boiler or furnace/AC $65 Install single fuel burning appliance with piping $65 Install, replace or repair single mechanical appliance $50 $55 Plumbing Permit Installation, Replacement, Repair $50 $55 + 1.75% of job valuation Single Family Exceptions: Repair/replace single plumbing fixture $50 $55 Private Swimming Pool Permit Building permit fees apply Public Swimming Pool Permit Building permit fees apply Sewer & Water Permit (all underground private utilities) Installation, Replacement, Repair $45 $55 + 1.75% of job valuation Single Family Exceptions: Replace/repair sewer or water service $80 $90 Water Access Charge $750 Competency Exams Fees Mechanical per test $30 Renewal - 3 year Mechanical $30 Contractor Licenses Mechanical $100 Solid Waste $200 Tree Maintenance $95 Dog Licenses 1 year $25 2 year $40 3 year $50 Potentially Dangerous Dog License – 1 year $100 Dangerous Dog License – 1 year $250 Interim License $15 Off-Leash Dog Area Permit (non-resident) $55 Penalty for no license $40 City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6d) Page 9 Title: Public Hearing to Consider First Reading of 2017 Fee Ordinance Inspections After Hours Inspections $75 per hour (minimum 2 hrs.) Installation of permanent sign w/footing inspection Based on valuation using building permit table Re-Inspection Fee (after correction notice issued and has not been corrected within 2 subsequent inspections) $130 Insurance Requirements A minimum of: Circus $1,000,000 General Liability Commercial Entertainment $1,000,000 General Liability Mechanical Contractors $1,000,000 General Liability Solid Waste $1,000,000 General Liability Tree Maintenance & Removal $1,000,000 General Liability Vehicle Parking Facility $1,000,000 General Liability ISTS Permit Sewage treatment system install or repair $125 License Fees - Other Investigation Fee $300 per establishment requiring a business license Late Fee 25% of license fee (minimum $50) License Reinstatement Fee $250 Transfer of License (new ownership) $75 Plan Review - 50% of amount due at time of application. Exception: Single Family Residential additions, accessory structures and remodels. Building Permits 65% of Permit Fee Repetitive Building 25% of Permit Fee for Duplicate Structure Electrical Permits 35% of Permit Fee Mechanical Permits 35% of Permit Fee Plumbing Permits 35% of Permit Fee Sewer & Water Permits 35% of Permit Fee Single Family Interior Remodel Permits 35% of Permit Fee Rental Housing License Condominium/Townhouse/Cooperative $90 per unit Duplex both sides non-owner occupied $170 $175 per duplex Housing Authority owned single family dwelling units $15 per unit Multiple Family Per Building $220 $230 Per Unit $15 Single Family Unit $120 $125 per dwelling unit Temporary Noise Permit $65 $70 Temporary Use Permits Amusement Rides, Carnivals & Circuses $260 Commercial Film Production Application $100 Petting Zoos $60 Temporary Outdoor Retail Sales $110 Vehicle Decals Solid Waste $25 Tree Maintenance & Removal $10 City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6d) Page 10 Title: Public Hearing to Consider First Reading of 2017 Fee Ordinance OPERATIONS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT Permit to Exceed Vehicle Weight Limitations (MSC) $30 $50 each Winter Parking Permit Caregiver parking $25 No off-street parking available No Charge Off-street parking available $125 POLICE DEPARTMENT Animals Animal Impound Initial impoundment $35 2nd offense w/in year $60 3rd offense w/in year $85 4th offense w/in year $110 Boarding Per Day $25 Dangerous Dog Annual Review Hearing $250 Potentially Dangerous Dog Annual Review Hearing $100 Criminal Background Investigation Volunteers & Employees $5 False Alarm (Police) Residential Commercial 1st offense $0 $0 2nd offense in same year $100 $100 3rd offense in same year $100 $125 4th offense in same year $100 $150 5th offense in same year $100 $175 Each subsequent in same year $100 $25 increase Late payment fee 10% Solicitor/Peddler Registration $150 Lost ID Replacement Fee $25 Vehicle Forfeiture Administrative fee in certain vehicle forfeiture cases $250 City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6d) Page 11 Title: Public Hearing to Consider First Reading of 2017 Fee Ordinance Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect January 1, 2017. Public Hearing October 17, 2016 Second Reading November 7, 2016 Date of Publication November 17, 2016 Date Ordinance takes effect January 1, 2017 Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council November 7, 2016 City Manager Mayor Attest: Approved as to form and execution: City Clerk City Attorney City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6d) Page 12 Title: Public Hearing to Consider First Reading of 2017 Fee Ordinance SUMMARY ORDINANCE NO. _____-16 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FEES CALLED FOR BY ORDINANCE FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2017 This ordinance sets 2017 fees as outlined in Appendix A of the City Code of Ordinances. The fee ordinance is modified to reflect the cost of providing services and is completed each year to determine what, if any, fees require adjustment. This ordinance shall take effect January 1, 2017. Adopted by the City Council November 7, 2016 Jake Spano /s/ Mayor A copy of the full text of this ordinance is available for inspection with the City Clerk. Published in St. Louis Park Sailor: November 17, 2016 Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: October 17, 2016 Public Hearing Agenda Item: 6e EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Assessment of Delinquent Charges RECOMMENDED ACTION: Mayor to open the public hearing, solicit comments, and close the public hearing. Motion to Adopt Resolution to assess delinquent water, sewer, storm water, refuse, abating grass/weed cutting, tree removal/injection, false alarm fees and other miscellaneous charges. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council desire to collect outstanding fees and charges through the special assessment process? SUMMARY: The City certifies delinquent charges to Hennepin County as a means to collect on these accounts. The certification is done via the special assessment process, and becomes a lien on the individual properties that is due over the next year or several years, depending upon the type of charge. Information on the 2016 certification process is provided below. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Collection of these charges is vital to the financial stability of the City’s utility systems and to reimburse the City for expenses incurred in providing services. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion Sample Certification Letter Resolution Levying Assessment Prepared by: Patricia Sulander, Accountant Reviewed by: Mark Ebensteiner, Finance Manager, Tim Simon, Chief Financial Officer Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6e) Page 2 Title: Assessment of Delinquent Charges DISCUSSION BACKGROUND: Each of the customers involved in this special assessment process received a City service. Subsequently, the customers were then billed through our regular billing process. The invoice(s) is/are now past due, and the recommended method of collecting the past due amounts is through certification as a special assessment to the property for the next year or years taxes depending on the delinquency. In advance of the public hearing date, individual letters were mailed to property owners and tenants, if applicable, advising them of the assessment and their right to be heard before the City Council. Per discussion with Council and the resolution passed on September 15, 2014, all delinquent utility accounts have been assessed a $15 administrative fee. This fee is not included in the 2016 amount below so as to provide consistent comparative data. The table below shows comparison data from 2011 - 2016 in relation to number of letters mailed and value of delinquent amounts. Year Number of Letters Delinquent Amounts Final Certification Amounts 2016 1866 $964,642 N/A 2015 1768 $900,558 $507,410 2014 1810 $929,886 $516,290 2013 1811 $872,661 $475,977 2012 1803 $816,357 $504,937 2011 1631 $834,605 $583,642 Each year there are a number of residents who pay their delinquent amount(s) before the certification deadline, thereby reducing the final amount certified and sent to Hennepin County. In addition, during the month of October, there are several hundred property owners who contact the City with questions about their outstanding balance(s) and the certification process. The 2016 delinquent balance was $788,358 as of the close of business on October 7, 2016. Staff will provide the delinquent amount balance as of the close of business on October 17, 2016 at the Council meeting. Customers have until October 28, 2016 at 4:30 p.m. to pay the delinquent amount. The amounts shown above also do not include interest, the $30.00 per account administrative fee, or the $75 penalty for utility accounts that are being certified for the second consecutive year. Of the 711 accounts certified in 2015, 422 received this additional penalty of $75 for being certified in consecutive years; 2014 was the first year this was in place. A copy of the assessment roll is on file with the City Clerk’s office for review. NEXT STEPS: After conducting a public hearing, the City Council is asked to direct the assessment of delinquent water, sewer, storm water, refuse, abating grass/weed cutting, tree removal/injection, false alarm fees and other miscellaneous charges against the benefiting property. Staff will continue to collect payments related to the delinquent accounts and work with residents to resolve issues related to their delinquent accounts. All delinquent accounts outstanding as of October 28, 2016 at 4:30 p.m. will be certified to Hennepin County for collection as part of the owner’s property tax bill. Upon certification, the delinquent amounts will become a lien on the individual properties. At this time, the Finance Division has not received notice of anyone wanting to speak at the Public Hearing. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6e) Page 3 Title: Assessment of Delinquent Charges 5005 Minnetonka Blvd St. Louis Park, MN 55416-2216 Date of Notice: October 1, 2016 Mailing Address Line 1 Mailing Address Line 2 Mailing Address Line 3 Mailing Address Line 4 RE: Charges Owed: For Delinquent Utility Account: Service Address: Service Address Delinquent Amount: Current WO Balance Account Number: Account Number Customer Number: Customer Number Property I.D. Number: Tax Roll Numeric Dear: Property Owner, The City of St. Louis Park encourages its customers to remain current in the payment of their bills. When accounts become delinquent, according to Minnesota law, they may be certified to Hennepin County to be collected with property taxes payable in the next year. City of St. Louis Park records show this account was delinquent as of September 19, 2016. By receiving this letter, this account has been moved into certification, and has received an administrative fee of $15. In an effort to avoid the account from being certified to the property taxes, the City is requesting that payment in full be received at City Hall by Friday, October 28, 2016 at 4:30 p.m. If payment in full is not received by that date and time, the outstanding delinquent amount, plus an additional administrative fee of $30, and interest at a rate of 4.00% for 13 months will be sent to Hennepin County for collection with the property taxes in 2017 (total administrative fee is $45). If this account was certified in the prior year, a $75 administrative penalty fee will also be assessed to the account (total administrative fee is $120). The City Council will consider final action on all delinquent accounts at a public hearing during the regular Council meeting on Monday, October 17, 2016 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers. A written appeal may be presented to the Council at that time or appeals may be made to Mark Ebensteiner – Finance Manager, 5005 Minnetonka Blvd., St. Louis Park, MN 55416. The City would like to avoid the certification process, as it adds additional costs to all parties. Please feel free to contact our office at (952) 924-2111 if you have questions regarding this notice. Payments may be made via cash, check, or credit card in person at City Hall, by mailing a check to City Hall, or paying by credit card at https://eub.stlouispark.org. Payments cannot be accepted over the phone due to payment card industry guidelines protecting customer’s financial information. For those customers who use eBill, please check your “junk” email folder if that address is not on your safe senders list. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Mark Ebensteiner Finance Manager City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 6e) Page 4 Title: Assessment of Delinquent Charges RESOLUTION NO. 16-____ LEVYING ASSESSMENT FOR DELINQUENT UTILITY ACCOUNTS, TREE REMOVAL/INJECTION, FALSE ALARM FEES AND OTHER MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES WHEREAS, the City Council has heretofore determined by ordinance the rates and charges for water, sewer, storm water and refuse services of the city and has provided for the abatement of tree removal/injection, grass/weed cutting and other miscellaneous charges to a home or business shall be at the expense of the owners of the premises involved; and WHEREAS, all such sums become delinquent and assessable against the property served under Section 6-158, Section 6-206, Section 9-103, Section 9-110, Section 11-2004 of the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code and Minnesota Statutes 18.023, 18.271, 443 and 429; and WHEREAS, Accounting has prepared an assessment roll setting forth an assessment against each tract or parcel of land served by water, sewer, storm water and refuse services of the City or charged for the costs of abating grass/weed cutting, tree removal/injection, false alarm fees and other miscellaneous charges which remain unpaid at the close of business on October 28, 2016; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park that said assessment roll is hereby adopted and approved, and there is hereby levied and assessed against each and every tract of land described therein an assessment in the amounts respectively therein abating water, sewer, storm water, refuse, grass/weed cutting, tree removal/injection, false alarm fees and other miscellaneous charges which remain unpaid at the close of business on October 28, 2016; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chief Financial Officer is hereby authorized to deliver said assessment roll to the Auditor of Hennepin County for collection of the assessment in the same manner as other municipal taxes are collected and payment thereof enforced with interest from the date of this resolution at the rate of four percent (4 %) per annum. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council October 17, 2016 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: October 17, 2016 Action Agenda Item: 8a EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Consultant Contract for Vision Process RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to approve the contract with Rebecca Ryan of NEXT Generation Consulting, Inc. for services related to the City upcoming community visioning process. POLICY CONSIDERATION: None SUMMARY: At the October 10th City Council meeting, the City Council met with Rebecca Ryan of NEXT Generation Consulting to discuss the process and the methods for community engagement. The work plan is outlined in the Scope of Services attached to the contract. Following approval of the contract, a detailed work plan will be prepared to determine specific dates for meeting and community engagement opportunities. Extensive outreach efforts are central to the process of updating the Community Vision and four core strategies that will be employed are Town Hall style meetings, training facilitators for neighbor-to-neighbor conversations, special efforts to engage the under-represented, and highly visible, creative community activities and events. A Steering Committee of nine members from the community will work with NEXT Generation Consulting and act as liaisons between the community and the Council for the process. Committee members will be selected to represent a broad cross-section of the community, geographically and demographically, including representing a variety of sectors within the city. In addition to the Steering Committee, a Staff committee led by the City’s Communication and Marketing Manager, Jacque Larson, has been established to provide input and review the outreach process. The first item for this committee is to provide recommendations for the Steering Committee members who would be appointed by the City Council (tentatively Nov. 7th). NEXT STEPS: A detailed work plan and schedule will be created for the process. Recommendations for the Steering Committee will be brought to the City Council in November. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The Vision update contract amount is $120,000 and the source of funding is the Development Fund. VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged community. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Professional Services Agreement for Vision Update Process Prepared by: Meg J. McMonigal, Principal Planner Reviewed by: Kevin Locke, Community Development Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Page 2 Title: Consultant Contract for Vision Process AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES This Agreement is made on the 10th day of October, 2016, between the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota (“City”), whose business address is 5005 Minnetonka Boulevard, St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416-2290, and NEXT Generation Consulting, Inc. (“Contractor”) whose business address is 4533 Rigney Lane, Madison, WI 53704. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT The City has adopted a policy regarding the selection and hiring of consultants to provide a variety of professional services for City projects. That policy requires that person, firms, or corporations providing such services enter into written contracts with the City. The purpose of this contract is to set forth terms and conditions for community engagement and foresight services for the City’s Vision St. Louis Park project. The City and Contractor agree as follows: 1. Contractor’s Services. The Contractor agrees to provide professional services as described in Exhibit A, attached and made a part of this Agreement. 2. Time for Performance of Services. The Contractor shall perform the services outlined in Exhibit A according to the schedule in Exhibit C. 3. Compensation for Services. City agrees to pay the Contractor for services as described in Exhibit A. Compensation shall be in accordance with Exhibit B, attached and made a part of this Agreement. 4. The Contractor, upon direction of the City, agrees to perform the following Engineering Services for Project: A. See Exhibits A (Work Scope), B (Budget), and C (Schedule). B. Special Contractors may be utilized by the Contractor when required by the complex or specialized nature of the Project and when authorized in writing by the City. C. Extra Services: City agrees to pay Contractor for extra services by the Contractor or Special Contractors when authorized in writing by the City. 5. The City agrees to provide the Contractor with the complete information concerning the scope of the Project and to perform the following services: A. Access to the Area: The City shall obtain access to and make all provisions for the Contractor to enter upon public and private lands as required for the Contractor to perform such work as surveys and inspections in the development of the Project. B. Consideration of the Contractor’s Work: The City shall give thorough consideration to all reports, sketches, estimates, drawings, and other documents presented by the City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Page 3 Title: Consultant Contract for Vision Process Contractor, and shall inform the Contractor of all decisions within a reasonable time so as not to delay the work of the Contractor. C. Standards: The City shall furnish the Contractor with a copy of any design and construction standards they may require in the preparation of the report for the Project. D. Owner’s Representative: A person shall be appointed to act as the City’s representative with respect to the work to be performed under this Agreement. He or she shall have complete authority to transmit instructions, receive information, interpret, and define the City’s policy and decisions, with respect to the materials, equipment, elements, and systems pertinent to the work covered by this Agreement. 6. Method of Payment: The Contractor shall submit to the City, on a monthly basis, itemized bills for professional services performed under Section 4 of this Agreement. Bills submitted shall be paid in the same manner as other claims made to the City. A. Progress Payment. For work reimbursed on an hourly basis, the Contractor shall indicate for each employee, his or her name, job title, the number of hours worked, rate of pay for each employee, a computation of amounts due for each employee, and the total amount due for each project task. Contractor shall verify all statements submitted for payment in compliance with Minnesota Statutes Sections 471.38 and 471.391. For reimbursable expenses, if permitted in Exhibit A, the Contractor shall provide such documentation as reasonably required by the City. B. Abandoned or Suspended Work. If any work performed by the Contractor is abandoned or suspended in whole or in part by the City, the Contractor shall be paid for any services performed on account of it prior to receipt of written notice from the City of such abandonment or suspension, all as shown on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. C. Compensation for Services of the Contractor. The City shall pay the Contractor for the services described in Exhibit A of this Agreement. The fee that the City will pay under this Agreement shall not exceed the amount shown on Exhibit B for this project. D. Payments for the Contractor’s Reimbursable Costs. The Contractor shall be reimbursed for the work of special consultants, as described in Section 4.B, and for other items when authorized in writing by the City. Such items shall include: Transportation of principals and employees on special trips to the Project or to other locations, materials and supplies, and AutoCADD as required to expedite the work, and reproduction of reports. 7. Accuracy of Work. Contractor shall be responsible for the accuracy of the work and the utilization of all determinant data, and shall promptly make necessary revisions or corrections resulting from errors and omissions on the part of Contractor without additional compensation. If the date or materials furnished by the City, and used in the conduct of this work are found to be in error, incorrect, or inappropriate, the City shall direct Contractor to modify, update, City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Page 4 Title: Consultant Contract for Vision Process and/or correct the affected work product. All such corrective work performed by Contractor shall be considered to be additional services for which additional compensation shall be paid to Contractor on the basis of Contractor’s standard fees or actual costs incurred. 8. Project Manager and Staffing. The Contractor has designated Stephanie Ricketts and Rebecca Ryan to serve on the Project. They shall be assisted by other staff members as necessary to facilitate the completion of the Project in accordance with the terms established herein. Contractor may not remove or replace Stephanie Ricketts or Rebecca Ryan from the Project without the approval of the City. 9. Audit Disclosure. The Contractor shall allow the City or its duly authorized agents reasonable access to such of the Contractor’s books and records as are pertinent to all services provided under this Agreement. Any reports, information, data, etc. given to, or prepared or assembled by, the Contractor under this Agreement which the client requests to be kept confidential shall not be made available to any individual or organization without the City’s prior written approval. All finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs, and reports prepared by the Contractor shall become the property of the City upon termination of this Agreement, but Contractor may retain copies of such documents as records of the services provided. 10. Term. The term of this Agreement shall be from October 2016 through July, 2017, the date of signature by the parties notwithstanding. This Agreement may be extended upon the written mutual consent of the parties for such additional period as they deem appropriate, and upon the terms and conditions as herein stated. 11. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by either party by seven (7) days’ written notice delivered to the other party at the address written above. Upon termination under this provision if there is no fault of the Contractor, the Contractor shall be paid for services rendered and reimbursable expenses until the effective date of termination. If however, the City terminates the Agreement because the Contractor has failed to perform in accordance with this Agreement, no further payment shall be made to the Contractor, and the City may retain another contractor to undertake or complete the work identified in Paragraph 1. If as a result, the City incurs total costs for the work (including payments to both the present contractor and a future contractor) which exceed a maximum Agreement amount, if any, specified under Paragraph 3, then the Contractor shall be responsible for the difference between the cost actually incurred and the Agreement amount. 12. Subcontractor. The Contractor shall not enter into subcontracts for services provided under this Agreement except as noted in the scope of services, without the express written consent of the City. The Contractor shall pay any subcontractor involved in the performance of this Agreement within ten (10) days of the Contractor’s receipt of payment by the City for undisputed services provided by the subcontractor. If the Contractor fails within that time to pay the subcontractor any undisputed amount for which the Contractor has received payment by the City, the Contractor shall pay interest to the subcontractor on the unpaid amount at the rate of 1-1/2 percent per month or any part of a month. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of $100 or more is $10. For an unpaid balance of less than $100, the Contractor shall pay the actual interest penalty due to the subcontractor. A subcontractor who prevails in a civil action to collect interest City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Page 5 Title: Consultant Contract for Vision Process penalties from the Contractor shall be awarded its costs and disbursements, including attorney’s fees, incurred in bringing the action. 13. Independent Contractor. At all times and for all purposes herein, the Contractor is an independent contractor and not an employee of the City. No statement herein shall be construed so as to find the Contractor an employee of the City. 14. Non-Discrimination. During the performance of this contract, the Contractor shall not discriminate against any employee or applicants for employment because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, disability, or age. The Contractor shall post in places available to employees and applicants for employment, notices setting forth the provisions of this non-discrimination clause and stating that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment. The Contractor shall incorporate the foregoing requirements of this paragraph in all of its subcontracts for program work, and will require all of its subcontractors for such work to incorporate such requirements in all subcontracts for program work. 15. Assignment. Neither party shall assign this Agreement, nor any interest arising herein, without the written consent of the other party. 16. Services Not Provided For. No claim for services furnished by the Contractor not specifically provided for herein shall be honored by the City. 17. Severability. The provisions of this Agreement are severable. If any portion hereof is, for any reason, held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be contrary to law, such decision shall not affect the remaining provisions of the Agreement. 18. Entire Agreement. The entire agreement of the parties is contained herein. This Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof as well as any previous agreements presently in effect between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. Any alterations, amendments, deletions, or waivers of the provisions of this Agreement shall be valid only when expressed in writing and duly signed by the parties, unless otherwise provided herein. 19. Compliance with Laws and Regulations. In providing services hereunder, the Contractor shall abide by all statutes, ordinances, rules, and regulations pertaining to the provisions of services to be provided. Any violation shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement and entitle the City to immediately terminate this Agreement. 20. Waiver. Any waiver by either party of a breach of any provisions of this Agreement shall not affect, in any respect, the validity of the remainder of this Agreement. 21. Indemnification. Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers, and employees harmless from any liability, claims, damages, costs, judgments, or expenses, including reasonable attorney’s fees, resulting directly or indirectly from an act or omission (including without limitation professional errors or omissions) of the Contractor, its agents, employees, or subcontractors in the performance of the services provided by this Agreement and against all losses by reason of the failure of said Contractor fully to perform, in any respect, all obligations under this Agreement. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Page 6 Title: Consultant Contract for Vision Process 22. Insurance. A. General Liability. During the term of this Agreement, Contractor shall maintain a general liability insurance policy with limits of at least $600,000 for each person, and each occurrence, for both personal injury and property damage. This policy shall name the City as an additional insured for the services provided under this Agreement and shall provide that the Contractor’s coverage shall be the primary coverage in the event of a loss. The policy shall also insure the indemnification obligation contained in Paragraph No. 21. A certificate of insurance on the City’s approved form which verifies the existence of this insurance coverage must be provided to the City before work under this Agreement is begun. B. Worker’s Compensation. The Contractor shall secure and maintain such insurance as will protect Contractor from claims under the Worker’s Compensation Acts and from claims for bodily injury, death, or property damage which may arise from the performance of Contractor’s services under this Agreement. C. Professional Liability Insurance: The Contractor agrees to provide to the City a certificate evidencing that they have in effect, with an insurance company in good standing and authorized to do business in Minnesota, a professional liability insurance policy. Said policy shall insure payment of damage for legal liability arising out of the performance of professional services for the City, in the insured’s capacity as the Contractor, if such legal liability is caused by an error, omission, or negligent act of the insured or any person or organization for whom the insured is legally liable. Said policy shall provide an aggregate limit of $1,000,000. 23. Records Access. The Contractor shall provide the City access to any books, documents, papers, and record which are directly pertinent to the specific contract, for the purpose of making audit, examination, excerpts, and transcriptions, for three years after final payments and all other pending matters related to this contract are closed. 24. Ownership of Documents. All plans, diagrams, analyses, reports, and information generated in connection with performance of the agreement shall become the property of the City. The City may use the information for it purposes. Such use by the City shall not relieve any liability on the part of the Contractor. 25. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be controlled by the laws of the State of Minnesota. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Page 7 Title: Consultant Contract for Vision Process Executed as of the day and year first written above. CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK ______________________________ Attest: Mayor ___________________________________ ______________________________ City Clerk City Manager NEXT Generation Consulting, Inc. OWNER(S)/CORPORATION By Rebecca Ryan Its President and CEO City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Page 8 Title: Consultant Contract for Vision Process EXHIBIT A – WORK SCOPE NEXT Generation Consulting, Inc. (“NGC” or “we”) will complete the following in support of the Vision St. Louis Park process. The project goals are: 1. Engage the broadest possible cross-section of St. Louis Park residents — especially those who are traditionally underrepresented — in a dialogue about the future of their community; 2. Develop a dynamic and ambitious vision — supported by core focus areas — that will build on St. Louis Park's character and strengths and make it an even more robust place to live, work, and play now and in the future; 3. Align the results of Vision St. Louis Park with the City's next comprehensive plan To meet these goals we will complete the following seven-stage work plan: Stage 0: Prepare for Success ~ “Measure twice, cut once.” Before Vision St. Louis Park publicly launches, we will plan for success. In this stage, we will: 1. Assign a project manager, Stephanie Ricketts (sr@nextgenerationconsulting.com), who’ll serve as NGC’s official representative on day-to-day matters related to Vision St. Louis Park. Stephanie will be supported by Lisa Loniello (ll@nextgenerationconsulting.com) and Rebecca Ryan (rr@nextgenerationconsulting.com); 2. Advise the City and Council on how to choose a group of community representatives to serve on the Vision St. Louis Park steering committee. Ideally, this committee would be generationally diverse, ethnically diverse, and diverse according to sector, i.e. entrepreneurs, nonprofit, business, civic, etc. They should have an entrepreneurial mindset and have reach or connections into segments of the community that aren’t normally engaged in community outreach or public processes; 3. Create a detailed work plan with the City Staff, led by Meg McMonigal for the City of St. Louis Park and Stephanie Ricketts of NGC. The work plan will include: o Dates for critical events/meetings, e.g. kick off meeting with Steering Committee; dates for all four community engagement strategies (See Stage 1); reports to City Directors, City Council and other key constituencies; Dates for Town Hall Meetings; etc. o Identifying key deliverables and their timing, e.g. signed contract; logo presentation; review periods; final plan, etc. o Identifying key constituencies and how we will communicate with them to elicit feedback and keep them apprised of progress, e.g. City of St. Louis Park Directors; Community residents; Steering Committee; City’s internal communications committee; City’s internal technical committee; City Council; City Boards and Commissions 4. Work with the City’s communication team, led by Jacqueline Larsen, to design the project’s logo/brand and communication plan. NGC’s designer, Dave Taylor, will create a customized logo for Vision St. Louis Park. The communication plan will includes deadlines for the Park Perspective; an engagement plan for Facebook, Twitter, Park Alert City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Page 9 Title: Consultant Contract for Vision Process and other online outlets, and media plans for the Sun-Sailor, Star Tribune, and Pioneer Press as appropriate. 5. Meet with the Vision St. Louis Park Steering Committee after the have been appointed by the City Council to discuss the project’s key milestones and how they can assist with two project goals: engaging a broad base of community input, and identifying the key trends the city will face in the next decade. Stage 1: Community Engagement We will use the following four strategies to reach as broad a cross-section of St. Louis Park residents as possible: Strategy 1: They come to us This strategy is effective to engage those who are already connected to the City of St. Louis Park. Our activities will include: 1. Surveying fans of the City’s Facebook page, followers on Twitter and those who’ve subscribed to the City’s email and text notification service with short surveys or provocative questions about the future of St. Louis Park. 2. Using the City’s website and Facebook page to publish updates and details about Vision St. Louis Park. 3. Hosting three public Town Hall Meetings to discuss ideas citizens have for the future of St. Louis Park. Strategy 2: Neighbor-to-neighbor This strategy is designed to leverage the City’s connections with neighborhoods and other community members, and invite community leaders to host conversations about the future of St. Louis Park. Our activities will include: 1. Train the Facilitator – in this public meeting, we will teach neighborhood leaders and block captains how to host and facilitate a neighborhood meeting about the future of St. Louis Park. Our emphasis will be on hosting productive, future- focused conversations in a consistent way, and reporting all insights back to the consultants and project teams. 2. Design and provide “meeting in a box” materials to all facilitator trainees. These kits will include all materials needed to host and facilitate a neighborhood meeting, e.g. scripts for facilitators, meeting guidelines, agendas for participants, a sign for the window, home or office where the meeting is taking place, markers and flipchart paper, self-addressed return instructions, and more. Strategy 3: Engage the under-represented To ensure the broadest possible cross section of representation in Vision St. Louis Park, the Steering Committee, City staff and consultants will work hard to determine: 1. Which communities are we at risk of missing in a public processes like Vision St. Louis Park? Examples from past clients include: Children, e.g. middle and/or high school students Members of specific faith communities, e.g. Jewish, Muslim, etc. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Page 10 Title: Consultant Contract for Vision Process Members of the specific ethnic communities, e.g. Russian, Latino, Somali, etc. Residents who live in affordable housing and aren’t “single family resident” homeowners Young professionals who live or work in St. Louis Park but are unlikely to attend meetings Parents of school-aged children who are too busy to attend meetings, e.g. hockey moms Senior citizens who no longer drive or do limited driving 2. How can we reach these residents on their terms, e.g. through their churches, grocery stores, community centers, festivals, etc? Strategy 4: Highly visible/creative input This is a passive strategy (no facilitator/no script) to elicit community members’ ideas about the future of St. Louis Park. The City staff and steering committee will make a final determination of where and what to use, but we would like to see some public, highly visual displays of people sharing their ideas for the future. Options are limited to our imagination, but some ideas include: o Install mobile chalkboards and chalk at public, citywide events. The chalkboards will have a single question or statement stenciled on them, e.g. “My future St. Louis Park is…” Citizens will naturally take chalk and record their answers. When the boards are filled, someone on the City staff will snap a photo and email it to the consultants, and wipe the chalkboard clean to collect more feedback. The chalkboards can rotate around the City or around neighborhoods. o In the evenings, project a live twitter feed onto an outdoor wall of highly visible building. The feed can be citizen responses to a question with a single hashtag, e.g. #VisionSLP; o Before demolition of city property, one wall could be made into a chalkboard or graffiti wall and residents could be encouraged to share their creative ideas for the city in that temporary space. Stage 2: Forecast In this stage, Rebecca Ryan and a team of futurists from NGC will facilitate and/or execute the following foresight activities: 1. Identify trends in four areas (Resources, Technology, Demographics, and Governance) likely to impact the future of St. Louis Park. 2. Design a deck of trend cards and facilitate a “Trends Game” with the City Council, department directors, and steering committee. The purpose of the Trends Game is to identify high impact, high certainty trends for the future of St. Louis Park. 3. Design “an official future” (sometimes called a “baseline future”) for the City of St. Louis Park, based on the City’s current trajectory and historical response to change. 4. Design three additional futures for St. Louis Park based on community input from the previous stage and the most important trends identified in the Trends Game above. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Page 11 Title: Consultant Contract for Vision Process Stage 3: Synthesize In this phase, we’re bringing all the previous stages together and elicit feedback on our first draft of findings. We will: 1. Create a draft 8-page PDF summary of charts, tables, infographics, visualizations and pull-quotes that will summarize the community’s feedback, and bring it to life; 2. Create a draft of four stories about St. Louis Park’s possible futures, based on the trends identified during the forecasting stage, plus community input. Possible questions for the Steering Committee: o How do these insights align with what you heard during the community engagement process? o Where is further clarification needed? o What’s missing? o Which ideas or recommendations have the most potential to transform St. Louis Park? o Which ideas or recommendations do you want to prioritize for presentation to the City Council and Staff? Possible additional questions for the City Council and Staff: o Which ideas have unanimous support from Council and Staff? o Which ideas or recommendations require Council support? Staff support? Community support? o What is the natural timeline for implementing ideas and recommendations, e.g. next 12 months, next 36 months, etc.? o In light of these results, how should St. Louis Park’s current Vision and Priorities be updated, if at all? Stage 4: Refine and Recommend Using the “two meetings” and “no surprises” rules, we will incorporate the feedback from the previous stage, refine our recommendations, and make another presentation to stakeholders, i.e. Steering Committee, City Council, and department directors. Stage 5: From Vision to Action In this stage, we will move the vision and recommendations into deliverables that will help with the comprehensive plan, department plans, and vision for the broader community: 1. Janice Fadden and NGC staff will facilitate a daylong workshop with the City of St. Louis Park staff and partners to process the outcomes from Stage 4 into departmental plans using the Strategic Doing process. (https://www.pcrd.purdue.edu/signature- programs/strategic-doing.php) 2. Shai Roos and Brian Guenzel of the NGC team will make recommendations for the City’s next comprehensive plan, culminating in a presentation and meeting with City staff and comprehensive plan consultants. 3. We will design materials (a summary PDF, a small booklet, and a PowerPoint presentation) to share the key insights, stories, and next actions with the public at large. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Page 12 Title: Consultant Contract for Vision Process Stage 6: Community Celebration and Sharing This is a critical step to thank everyone who worked hard for Vision St. Louis Park, and to publicly share the outcomes of the project. We will: o Work with the steering committee and City staff to find a highly creative way to thank the community volunteers who hosted neighborhood meetings or went out of their way to ensure we reached a broad cross-section of people o Offer Rebecca Ryan to give a public presentation on the results and recommendations o Promote the project on our Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and social media platforms City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Page 13 Title: Consultant Contract for Vision Process EXHIBIT B – BUDGET The costs for all steps in Exhibit A – Work Scope are $120,000 plus travel, which we estimate will not exceed $8,000. The budget breakdown is outlined below: Stage Major Deliverables & Work Time (estimates prep, actual meeting time, and all follow-up) Budget 0 – Prepare for Success Meetings with Meg McMonigal and team to identify timelines, milestones and deliverables (24 hours) Produce final contract for City Council approval (5 hours) Create a GANT chart and schedule of major deliverables for internal reference and client communication Design a Vision St. Louis Park logo and brand identity system (40 hours) Design prototypes for all materials for “Meeting in a box” and Train the Facilitator (65 hours) Meet with department directors, City Council, communications team and others to solicit input and respond to questions or ideas about the project (8 hours) Meet with the Steering Committee to kick off the project (8 hours) Design the project’s communication plan, e.g. online, social media, etc. (8 hours) $17,250 1 – Community Engagement Design and host three Town Hall Meetings (12 hours) Design and execute two Train-the-Facilitator sessions for up to 60 facilitators (32 hours) Post and analyze online feedback via City’s SMS and email notifications, website, and social media (16 hours) Host up to ten additional meetings to reach traditionally under-represented communities (60 hours) Design and execute high visibility opportunities for citizen feedback (12 hours) $41,000 2 – Forecast Complete a trends analysis of resources, technology, demographics and governance (35 hours) Design the Trends Game including the deck of trends cards (30 hours) Facilitate the Trends Game at three meetings: City Council, Steering Committee, and department directors (9 hours) Write “the official future” plus three additional stories about the future of St. Louis Park based on the results of the trends game (22 hours) $22,750 3 – Synthesize Synthesize all community engagement results (80 hours) Create data visualizations for community response frequency, importance, etc. (30 hours) Design PDF to summarize community input and forecasting stories (80 hours) Presentations/discussion of draft results with City Council, steering committee, and staff (12 hours) $18,000 City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Page 14 Title: Consultant Contract for Vision Process 4 – Refine and Recommend Update the summary PDF based on feedback (30 hours) Included 5 – Ideas to Action Shai Roos and Brian Guenzel review the current comprehensive plan and make recommendations based on the recommendations from Vision St. Louis Park (15 hours) Staff and partners complete Strategic Doing workshop, and update work plans (15 hours) Final deliverables (summary PDF, booklet, PowerPoint) are completed (30 hours) $16,000 6 –Community Celebration and Sharing Rebecca Ryan of NGC speaks at community wide event $5,000 We estimate that the project will begin in mid-September 2016 and be complete by June 2017. We will bill monthly for work completed the previous month, e.g. we will bill in early November for work completed in October. Please note that phases are not all linear, e.g. some of Stage 2 (gathering trends) will occur during Stages 0 and 1. Travel expenses will be billed as accrued. All payments should be made to: NEXT Generation Consulting, Inc. 1882 East Main Street Madison, WI 53704 City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Page 15 Title: Consultant Contract for Vision Process EXHIBIT C – SCHEDULE We estimate that the project will begin in mid-September 2016 and run through mid-April 2017. The following table lists a tentative schedule for each stage and key meetings in the work scope. This schedule will be changed and updated throughout the project. Stage Key dates/deliverables 0 – Prepare for Success Sept. (ongoing) – Meetings between NGC and City staff to plan for all aspects of the project Sept. 30: City’s communication team identifies potential slate of steering committee candidates Oct. 10: Rebecca Ryan meets with City department heads to share project overview and elicit their hopes for the project and other feedback Oct. 11: Rebecca Ryan presents at City Council Study Session Oct. 17: City Council votes on Vision St. Louis Park contract Nov. 7: Council appoints Vision St. Louis Park steering committee members Nov. 30: Steering Committee Kickoff meeting Dec. 5: Public announcements and communications re: Vision St. Louis Park project, dates for Town Halls, Train-the-Facilitators, and how to be involved. Dec. 5 (ongoing): Recruit Facilitators to attend Train the Facilitator, and facilitate neighborhood meetings 1 – Community Engagement Jan., 2017 TBD: Town Hall meeting #1 Jan.-March, 2017: Weekly social media and online engagement Jan.-March: High visibility engagement, e.g. chalkboards, other rotating throughout the community Jan. 20: Identify all points of contact and confirm schedule to reach special populations who might not otherwise be engaged, e.g. students, renters, etc. Jan. 26, 27, or 28: Train-the-Facilitator Jan. 26, 27 or 28: Second Steering Committee meeting – Play Trends Game Jan. 26 or 27: Trends Game with City Council Feb. TBD: Town Hall meeting #2 Feb. TBD: Meetings #1-4 with special populations Feb. TBD: Third Steering Committee Meeting Feb. TBD: Trends Game with City staff and directors March TBD: Town Hall meeting #3 March TBD: Meetings #5-10 with special populations March TBD: Results of all neighborhood meetings due, debrief meeting with facilitators 2 – Forecast By Jan. 26: Trends identified and Trends Deck designed Feb. 10: “The Official Future” completed April 14: All four “future” stories of St. Louis Park are completed City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Page 16 Title: Consultant Contract for Vision Process 3 – Synthesize May 5: First draft of data visualizations and stories submitted to steering committee, City staff, City Council, and other stakeholders for review May 8/9/10: Meet with City staff, City Council and steering committee to discuss draft and solicit feedback and responses 4 – Refine and Recommend June 2: Second draft of data visualization and future stories completed and sent to City staff, City Council and steering committee June 12/13/14: Meet with City Council for final presentation and (any necessary) approval 5 – Ideas to Action June 12/13/14: Strategic Doing Workshop for City staff and partners: present Vision results and develop plans of action By June 30: Shai Roos and Brian Guenzel meet with City Staff and comprehensive plan consultants to share their recommendations for actualizing the Vision 6 – Report Back to Community June TBD: Community Celebration Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: October 17, 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Conditional Use Permit/Variance – Communication Tower, City of St. Louis Park RECOMMENDED ACTION: The following motions are recommended by the Planning Commission. One motion could be made for both actions. Motion to Adopt Resolution approving the Conditional Use Permit for a 70-foot tall communication tower, with conditions as recommended by staff. Motion to Adopt Resolution approving a 34-foot variance to the required 140-foot setback for the communication tower with conditions as recommended by staff. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the proposal meet the conditions of the Zoning Ordinance? SUMMARY: Requested is a Conditional Use Permit to allow a communication tower that is 70 feet in height, and a variance to allow the communication tower to be 106 feet from the property line instead of the required 140 foot minimum setback. The communication tower is needed to mount an antenna that will collect data from water meters the city recently installed in homes located in the northeast portion of the city. The city is having difficulty receiving signals from many homes this area, and the antenna will resolve this issue. The City of St. Louis Park is the applicant, however, the subject property is the Benilde-St. Margaret’s High School (BSM). BSM supports the applications provided the antenna locates on the existing light pole shown in the application. BSM would not support other locations because of disruptions to their athletic fields. The existing light pole is 60 feet tall, and the antenna would mount to the pole and extend 10 feet taller for an overall height of 70 feet. The maximum height allowed for communication towers in this district is 70 feet. A neighborhood meeting was conducted on September 6, 2016. Neighbors that attended had their questions answered, and a summary is provided in the attached discussion. The application was presented to the Planning Commission on October 5, 2016. A letter in opposition was entered into the public hearing. The Planning Commission recommended approval. The Planning Commission meeting minutes and resident’s letter are attached. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion Aerial Photo Draft Resolutions Excerpt of Planning Commission Minutes Applicant Letter/Development Plans Prepared by: Gary Morrison, Assistant Zoning Administrator Reviewed by: Sean Walther, Planning & Zoning Supervisor Michele Schnitker, Housing Supervisor/Deputy CD Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Action Agenda Item: 8b City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Page 2 Title: Conditional Use Permit/Variance – Communication Tower, City of St. Louis Park DISCUSSION Case No.: 16-37-CUP and 16-38-VAR Location: 2501 State Highway 100 Applicant: City of St. Louis Park REQUEST: Requested is a Conditional Use Permit to allow a communication tower that is 70 feet in height, and a variance to allow the communication tower to be 106 feet from the property line instead of the required 140 foot minimum setback. LOCATION: Comprehensive Plan: Civic Zoning: R-1 Single-Family Residence Neighborhood: Lake Forest City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Page 3 Title: Conditional Use Permit/Variance – Communication Tower, City of St. Louis Park Background: The city is requesting a CUP to allow a communication tower that is 70 feet in height. While the city is the applicant, the tower is located on the Benilde-St. Margaret’s high school property. The tower consists of an existing 60-foot tall light pole and a proposed ten-foot extension for the antenna. The lights on the existing pole are used to illuminate the running track and multi-purpose athletic field. The ten-foot extension consists of a two-inch diameter antenna which is mounted on top of a two-inch diameter galvanized steel pipe. The city is also requesting a 34-foot variance to the required setback to allow the communication tower to be located 106 feet from the side property line instead of the minimum required 140 feet. The city recently installed water meters in all homes in the city that broadcast the readings to a central collection point. The city, however, is having difficulty receiving a signal from homes in the northeast portion of the city. The purpose of this antenna is to fill the void by collecting those signals and relaying them to the collection point. Zoning Analysis: The following is an analysis of the zoning requirements for the CUP and variance request. Conditional Use Permit: The subject property is zoned R-1 Single-Family Residential. The R-1 district requires a CUP for communication towers with a height between 45 and 70 feet. The following is a review of the conditions applied to the communication towers: 1. All communication towers shall be located a minimum distance of twice their height from any parcel zoned or used for residential purposes, or zoned mixed-use. The communication tower is located adjacent to a residential property. The proposed communication tower is 70 feet in height, therefore, a 140 foot minimum setback is required. The communication tower is proposed to be located 106 feet from the property line. The city is requesting a variance to this provision. An analysis of the variance request is provided later in the report. 2. No more than one communication tower is allowed per parcel. There are no other communication towers located on the property. 3. Communication towers up to 120 feet in height shall be of a monopole type. The communication tower is a monopole type. There are no guy wires or other structural supports beyond the existing light pole and the two-inch diameter pipe proposed to extend from the top of the pole. 4. Antenna designs and mounts shall be designed to minimize visual impact. The tower consists of a 60-foot tall light pole which is used to illuminate the school’s running track and multi-purpose athletic field. The pole will remain the same with the exception of a narrow, two-inch wide galvanized pipe that will extend from the top of the pole. Staff believes this design minimizes the visual impact by utilizing an existing pole and a narrow extension. 5. Communication Tower Lighting. Communication towers shall not be illuminated by artificial means and shall not display strobe lights unless such lighting is specifically required by the Federal Aviation Administration or other federal or state law or regulation that preempts local regulations. The communication tower will not be illuminated with the exception of the existing field lights. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Page 4 Title: Conditional Use Permit/Variance – Communication Tower, City of St. Louis Park 6. Signs, Advertising and Display. The use of any portion of a communication tower for displaying flags, signs other than warning or equipment information signs is prohibited. There will be no signs, advertisements or other type of display on the pole. 7. Associated Equipment. Ground equipment associated with a communication tower or antenna shall be housed in a building. The building shall meet the architectural design standards of the Zoning Ordinance, and shall meet the minimum communication tower setback requirements of the underlying zoning district. There will be no ground equipment. All equipment associated with the antenna will be mounted to the pole, and will be located 10 feet from the ground. Variance: The city is requesting a 34-foot variance to the required 140-foot setback to allow the communication tower to be located 106 feet from the property line. The City may grant variances upon consideration of the following: a. The effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community. The 140 foot setback from residential properties is twice the tower height, and is required to address potential aesthetic impacts. The 140-foot setback is not required to protect adjacent properties in the event the tower collapses. The typical collapse radius is less than the tower height (70 feet). The structural integrity of the antenna and its low profile atop a much larger existing structure creates no known health, safety, or welfare concerns to occupants of surrounding lands. b. The request is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance and, The antenna is co-locating on an existing light pole, thereby minimizing the impact on the school property and adjacent residential properties. c. The request is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The request is to assist the city in providing efficient and cost-effective services. d. The applicant for the variance establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. “Practical difficulties,” as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that: 1. The property owner proposes to use the property for a land use permitted in the zoning district in which the land is located. A variance can be requested for dimensional items required in the zoning ordinance, including but not limited to setbacks and height limitations; The subject property is zoned R-1 Single-Family Residence. The communication tower is allowed by conditional use permit in the R-1 district. The variance is for a setback, which is a dimensional standard. 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; and, The city is having difficulty receiving signals from several water meters in the northeast section of the city. The antenna is required to address this difficulty. The location of the antenna is important because consideration must be given to a location that can collect data from all the meters in this area, and does not disrupt the property on which it is located. BSM granted permission to the city to locate the antenna on their property with the City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Page 5 Title: Conditional Use Permit/Variance – Communication Tower, City of St. Louis Park condition that the installation of the antenna does not disrupt their fields. The best location to meet these conditions is the requested pole, which is located on the northern edge of the athletic complex. 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. The antenna is a low profile, two-inch diameter, antenna to be mounted to the top of an existing light pole. It will extend 10 feet above the existing pole. The improvement will have minimal impact on the locality. 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. The location is not the result of economic considerations. The location is determined by a need to provide services to all homes in the area, and reduce the impact on the school athletic fields. 5. Practical difficulties include inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. The antenna and tower extension is two-inches in diameter, and does not impact sunlight for solar energy systems. e. There are circumstances unique to the property include the shape, topography, water conditions, or other physical conditions unique to the property; and, The unique circumstances that apply include the location requirements to pick-up the signals of all meters in the area, and minimize the impact on the existing athletic fields. f. The granting of the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant; and, The granting of the variance enables the city to provide a more efficient service to the residents in the area. This location is also at the request of the property owner. It is the only site available that provides the needed service without disrupting the school’s athletic fields. g. The granting of the variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to the adjacent property, unreasonably increase the congestion in the public streets, increase the danger of fire, or endanger public safety; and, The antenna and tower extension is two-inches in diameter, and does not impact the light and air to the adjacent properties. h. The granting of the variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant but is necessary to alleviate a practical difficulty. That practical difficulty is two-fold: (1) siting the antenna to best service properties in the northeast part of the city where sites are few, and (2) installing it in the most practical of ways by using an existing pole that minimizes the impact to existing facilities and neighborhood. The city pursued the pole located to the southeast of the track. BSM, however, would not grant access to this pole due to concerns that it would disrupt the athletic fields. Locations off-site were also pursued, specifically the office buildings located in the West End area. They, however, would not grant permission. Neighborhood Meeting: A neighborhood meeting was conducted on Tuesday, September 6, 2016. People in attendance asked the following questions, and staff was able to provide answers. 1. Will the tower be lit? No City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Page 6 Title: Conditional Use Permit/Variance – Communication Tower, City of St. Louis Park 2. What is the visibility and scale? (Will residents be able to see it? What’s the actual size?) The antenna is 2 inches in width. The pole it is mounted on is two inches in diameter. The pole and antenna combined length is 10 feet, and it will be mounted on top of an existing light pole. 3. Is there any health impacts from signal/wave transmission? No. This is the same technology used by Xcel and Centerpoint Energy when collecting their meter readings. This has been in place for many years, and there are no cases of documented harmful effects. 4. Will the antenna interfere with cellphone, telephone, other signals? No. The antenna uses a low frequency band that does not conflict with other commercial carriers. The same is true of Xcel and Centerpoint. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Page 7 Title: Conditional Use Permit/Variance – Communication Tower, City of St. Louis Park AERIAL PHOTO City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Page 8 Title: Conditional Use Permit/Variance – Communication Tower, City of St. Louis Park RESOLUTION NO. 16-____ A RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT UNDER SECTION 36-163(d)(5) OF THE ST. LOUIS PARK ORDINANCE CODE RELATING TO ZONING TO PERMIT A 70-FOOT TALL COMMUNICATION TOWER FOR PROPERTY ZONED R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT LOCATED AT 2501 STATE HIGHWAY 100 SOUTH BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park: Findings 1. The City of St. Louis Park has made application to the City Council for a Conditional Use Permit under Section 36-163(d)(5) of the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code for the purpose of allowing a 70-foot tall communication tower within a R-1 Single-Family Residential District located at 2501 State Highway 100 South for the legal description as follows, to-wit: That part of the South ½ of the Northwest ¼ of Section 31, Township 29, Range 24 lying east of State Highway No. 100, north of the south 330.00 feet thereof, and west of the east 450.00 feet thereof; also the west 233.58 feet of the east 450.00 of the north 500 feet of said South ½ of the Northwest ¼. Subject to roads. 2. The City Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission (Case No. 16-37-CUP) and the effect of the proposed communication tower on the health, safety and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area, the effect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan, and compliance with the intent of the Zoning Ordinance. 3. The Council has determined that the communication tower will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community nor will it cause serious traffic congestion nor hazards, nor will it seriously depreciate surrounding property values, and the proposed communication tower is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. 4. The contents of Planning Case File 16-37-CUP are hereby entered into and made part of the public hearing record and the record of decision for this case. Conclusion The Conditional Use Permit to permit a communication tower at the location described is granted based on the findings set forth above and subject to the following conditions: 1. The communication tower shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with Exhibits incorporated by reference herein. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Page 9 Title: Conditional Use Permit/Variance – Communication Tower, City of St. Louis Park 2. All necessary permits must be obtained. 3. In addition to any other remedies, the developer or owner shall pay an administrative fee of $750 per violation of any condition of this approval. 4. Under the Zoning Ordinance Code, this permit shall be revoked and cancelled if the building or structure for which the conditional use permit is granted is removed. 5. Assent form and official exhibits must be signed by applicant (or applicant and owner if applicant is different from owner) prior to issuance of a building permit. 6. Approval of a Building Permit, which may impose additional requirements. The City Clerk is instructed to record certified copies of this resolution in the Office of the Hennepin County Register of Deeds or Registrar of Titles as the case may be. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Page 10 Title: Conditional Use Permit/Variance – Communication Tower, City of St. Louis Park RESOLUTION NO. 16-____ A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCE FROM SECTION 36-368(d)(2) OF THE ORDINANCE CODE RELATING TO ZONING TO PERMIT A 34-FOOT VARIANCE TO THE REQUIRED 140-FOOT SETBACK FOR A COMMUNICATION TOWER LOCATED IN THE R-1 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONING DISTRICT AT 2501 STATE HIGHWAY 100 BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of St. Louis Park, Minnesota: Findings 1. The City of St. Louis Park has applied for a variance from Section 36-368(d)(2) of the Ordinance Code relating to zoning to allow a 106-foot setback for a 140-foot tall communication tower for property located in the R-1 Single Family Residential Zoning District at the following location, to-wit: That part of the South ½ of the Northwest ¼ of Section 31, Township 29, Range 24 lying east of State Highway No. 100, north of the south 330.00 feet thereof, and west of the east 450.00 feet thereof; also the west 233.58 feet of the east 450.00 of the north 500 feet of said South ½ of the Northwest ¼. Subject to roads. 2. On October 5, 2016, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, received testimony from the public, discussed the application and moved approval of a 34-foot variance to allow a 106-foot setback instead of the required 140-feet. 3. The Planning Commission considered the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, the effect on values of property in the surrounding area, and the effect of the proposed variance upon the Comprehensive Plan. The structural integrity of the antenna and its low profile atop a much larger existing structure creates no known health, safety, or welfare concerns to occupants of surrounding lands. Additionally, the antenna is co-locating on an existing light pole, thereby minimizing the impact on the school property and adjacent residential properties. 4. Because of conditions on the subject property and surrounding property, it is possible to use the property in such a way that the proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to the adjacent property, unreasonably increase the congestion in the public streets, increase the danger of fire, endanger the public safety, unreasonably diminish or impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. 5. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property and do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which such land is located. The city is having difficulty receiving signals from several water meters in the northeast section of the city. The antenna is required to address this difficulty. The location of the antenna is important because City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Page 11 Title: Conditional Use Permit/Variance – Communication Tower, City of St. Louis Park consideration must be given to a location that can collect data from all the meters in this area, and does not disrupt the property on which it is located. Benilde-St. Margaret’s granted permission to the city to locate the antenna on their property with the condition that the installation of the antenna does not disrupt their fields. The best location to meet these conditions is the requested pole, which is located on the northern edge of the athletic complex. 6. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. It will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty. The location is not the result of economic considerations. The location is determined by need to provide services to all homes in the area, and reduce the impact on the school athletic fields. 7. The contents of Planning Case File 16-38-VAR are hereby entered into and made part of the public hearing record and the record of decision of this case. 8. Under the Zoning Ordinance, this variance shall be deemed to be abandoned, revoked, or canceled if the holder shall fail to complete the work on or before one year after the variance is granted. 9. Under the Zoning Ordinance, this variance shall be revoked and cancelled if the building or structure for which the variance is granted is removed. CONCLUSION The application for a 34-foot variance to allow a 106-foot setback instead of the required 140-feet is granted based upon the findings set forth above, with the following condition: 1. The communication tower and antenna shall be constructed as shown on the official exhibits. The City Clerk is instructed to record certified copies of this resolution in the Office of the Hennepin County Register of Deeds or Registrar of Titles as the case may be. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council October 17, 2016 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Page 12 Title: Conditional Use Permit/Variance – Communication Tower, City of St. Louis Park EXCERPT OF UNOFFICIAL MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA OCTOBER 5, 2016 – 6:00 p.m. COUNCIL CHAMBERS MEMBERS PRESENT: Claudia Johnston-Madison, Torrey Kanne, Richard Person, Carl Robertson, Joe Tatalovich, Ethan Rickert (youth member) MEMBERS ABSENT: Lynne Carper, Lisa Peilen STAFF PRESENT: Sean Walther, Gary Morrison, Clint Pires, Cindy Walsh 1. Call to Order – Roll Call 2. Approval of Minutes of August 17, 2016 Commissioner Tatalovich made a motion to approve the minutes of August 17, 2016. Commissioner Kanne seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 4-0-1 (Robertson abstained). 3. Public Hearings A. Conditional Use Permit and Variance for Communication Tower Location: 2501 State Highway 100 S. Applicant: City of St. Louis Park Case No.: 16-37-CUP and 16-38-VAR Gary Morrison, Assistant Zoning Administrator, presented the staff report. He explained that the City of St. Louis Park is the applicant, however the property is Benilde-St. Margaret’s High School (BSM). The City is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to allow a communication tower that is 70 feet in height, and a variance to allow the communication tower to be 106 feet from the property line instead of the required 140 foot minimum setback. The purpose of the antenna is to relay signals transmitted from water meters installed in the northeast portion of the city. Mr. Morrison reviewed conditions applied to communication towers. Mr. Morrison reviewed findings for the variance request. Mr. Morrison discussed the neighborhood meeting held on September 6, 2016. Mr. Morrison noted that city staff Clint Pires, Chief Information Officer, and Cindy Walsh, Operations and Recreation Director, were present to answer questions. Commissioner Tatalovich asked about the selection of that particular light tower for the antenna. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Page 13 Title: Conditional Use Permit/Variance – Communication Tower, City of St. Louis Park Mr. Pires responded that the selection was based on BSM’s preference to minimize damage to the ground of the athletic field itself, due to equipment needed for installation of the antenna. Commissioner Kanne asked the location of current antenna which is not able to receive a signal. She asked if the new location had been tested. Mr. Pires said a propagation study was conducted for the meter reading program. Engineers looked at topography and came up with specific areas that they thought would best support the reading from the meters. The three elevated water towers were chosen. But, problems occurred with readings located at the periphery of the city. Commissioner Robertson asked Mr. Morrison to discuss the code requirement for setback being twice the distance of the height of the tower. Mr. Morrison said the criteria relates to collapse radius and aesthetic impacts. In this case there is an existing pole with several light fixtures on top of it and the antenna itself is only 10 feet above that with a diameter of 2 inches. Mr. Pires showed the Commission the antenna pole which would be used. Chair Johnston-Madison opened the public hearing. The Chair read a letter into the record from Conlan Law Group on behalf of client Joan Solomon, 2317 West Ridge Lane, opposing the requests and stating that practical difficulties do not exist which would necessitate a variance from existing city setbacks. As no one was present wishing to speak the Chair closed the public hearing. Commissioner Person asked if Ms. Solomon’s property is the closest residence to the pole. Mr. Morrison responded that is correct. Commissioner Robertson made a motion recommending approval of the Conditional Use Permit and variance, subject to conditions recommended by staff. Commissioner Tatalovich seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 5-0. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Title: Conditional Use Permit/Variance – Communication Tower, City of St. Louis ParkPage 14 City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Title: Conditional Use Permit/Variance – Communication Tower, City of St. Louis ParkPage 15 City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Title: Conditional Use Permit/Variance – Communication Tower, City of St. Louis Park Page 16 City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Title: Conditional Use Permit/Variance – Communication Tower, City of St. Louis ParkPage 17 City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Title: Conditional Use Permit/Variance – Communication Tower, City of St. Louis ParkPage 18 City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Title: Conditional Use Permit/Variance – Communication Tower, City of St. Louis ParkPage 19 City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Title: Conditional Use Permit/Variance – Communication Tower, City of St. Louis ParkPage 20 City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Title: Conditional Use Permit/Variance – Communication Tower, City of St. Louis ParkPage 21 City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Title: Conditional Use Permit/Variance – Communication Tower, City of St. Louis ParkPage 22 City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Title: Conditional Use Permit/Variance – Communication Tower, City of St. Louis ParkPage 23 MINNETONKA BOULEVARDWEST 26TH STREETVERNON AVENUE SOUTH ST A T E T R U N K H W Y . N O . 1 0 0 CITYOFST. LOUISPARKOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHEHYDWSSTOHEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGE876876875875875876876 878876878880880880 880880878878878880880878876874872870870872874876870872874876878880874PID= 31-029-24-24-0002ARCHDIOCESE ST. PAULAND MINNEAPOLISSEE DETAIL875UGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGE875875LEGEND= DENOTES A FOUND SECTION CORNERMONUMENTORIENTATION OF THIS BEARING SYSTEM ISBASED ON THE HENNEPIN COUNTYCOORDINATE SYSTEM NAD83 (1986)RIGHT OF WAY LINEBENILDE ST. MARGARETHennepin County, MN No. DateREVISIONSBy CHK APP'DSMKJMBFIELD WORK: 9/7/16 CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:SITE NAME: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISIONAND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYORUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.SITE SURVEYDESIGN0SCALE ( IN FEET )4080BOUNDARY LINE0494A2069.000© 2016 WIDSETH SMITH NOLTINGHALF SCALE ON 11"x17"FULL SCALE ON 22"x34"WIDSETH SMITH NOLTINGEngineering | Architecture | Surveying | EnvironmentalVICINITY MAP1"=600'QUARTER LINESECTION LINETREE DECIDUOUSBUILDING WALL HATCHUGEUNDERGROUND ELECTRICCONCRETE SURFACESURVEYOR NOTES:LOT LINENORTH NORTH SITECHAIN LINK FENCEGATE POSTDETAILNORTH OHEOVERHEAD ELECTRICEDGE OF WOODSELEC POLE0SCALE ( IN FEET )1020GRAVEL SURFACESIXTEENTH LINEGRIDNORTHGEODETICNORTHMAGNETICNORTHPROPERTY LINEELEC LIGHT POLESTSHYD WSTORM MANHOLECATCH BASINSANITARY MANHOLEHYDRANTWATER VALVESCHOOL METERDATA COLLECTOR SITECity Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Title: Conditional Use Permit/Variance – Communication Tower, City of St. Louis ParkPage 24 Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: October 17, 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: 1st Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Related to Fences RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to approve the first reading of an Ordinance amending Chapter 36 of the St. Louis Park Code of Ordinances relating to zoning, and to set the second reading for November 7, 2016. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the Council support the proposed changes to the fence regulations? SUMMARY: Staff is requesting amendments to the zoning ordinance for the following purpose: 1. Establish a list of materials that can be used to construct a fence. 2. Establish a list of materials that cannot be used to construct a fence. 3. Provide for exceptions to the design criteria. 4. Various clarifications. Planning Commission Review: The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on July 20, 2016. At that meeting, the Planning Commission directed staff to discuss the fence regulations at a study session. The study session was conducted on August 3, 2016 where the Planning Commission discussed the approved and prohibited materials list. The Planning Commission completed its review on October 5, 2016, and recommended approval. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion Proposed Ordinance Excerpt of Planning Commission Minutes Prepared by: Gary Morrison, Assistant Zoning Administrator Reviewed by: Sean Walther, Planning & Zoning Supervisor Michele Schnitker, Housing Supervisor Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Discussion Item: 8c City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 8c) Page 2 Title: 1st Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Related to Fences DISCUSSION REQUEST: Staff is requesting an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance that proposes to establish and clarify materials that can be used to construct a fence. BACKGROUND: At the July 20, 2016 planning commission meeting, staff presented a zoning ordinance amendment that proposed the following: 1. Establish and clarify materials that can be used to construct a fence. 2. Update the maximum size accessory building that can be constructed without a building permit. 3. Increase the size maximum allowed for signs in the R-4 Multiple-Family Residence district. 4. Decrease the minimum setback required for signs at schools, community centers, libraries, religious institutions, and other similar uses. The planning commission closed the public hearing, and forwarded a recommendation to the city council for each item, except those amendments pertaining to fences. The planning commission asked staff to bring that amendment back to them at a future study session. The planning commission discussed fences at the August 3, 2016 study session. The commission discussed the material requirements, and directed staff to bring the amendment back to the planning commission for formal recommendation. On October 5, 2016, the commission recommended the city council approve the proposed fence amendments. PROPOSED ORDINANCE: From time-to-time, staff receives a call expressing concern over the type of material a neighbor used to build their fence. Staff has been taking note of the concerns and has drafted the proposed amendment to address the concerns. Staff believes the amendment provides a balance between a variety of acceptable materials, aesthetics, and safety. In summary, the ordinance allows fences to be constructed of wood, metal, bricks, masonry, rigid plastic or other materials designed for permanent outdoor fencing. It also states that wood fences must be constructed of cedar, redwood, or other naturally or pressure treated decay resistant wood. The intent is to avoid using wood that is not designed to withstand the effects of weather. The ordinance prohibits fences from being constructed of hazardous materials such as razor or barbed wire. It prohibits electrical fences, and materials that are not intended for outdoor use. Chain link or metal wire fencing is limited to 11-gauge in diameter or larger. Exceptions to the materials are listed in certain circumstances. For example, snow fences are permitted between November 1 and April 15 by certain uses, such as public buildings, schools, golf courses, etc. Chicken wire is allowed when used to enclose a garden or chicken coop and run. Revisions: As a result of the planning commission’s discussion, staff made changes to the exceptions section of the design standards. The exceptions address specific circumstances where temporary fencing is required that won’t meet the standards, such as construction sites. An exception was also added to provide opportunities for residents to use materials that do not meet the design requirements. The exception proposes to allow materials to be used in a patio or landscaping setting intended to provide minimal screening or for decorative purposes. Staff is recommending this exception apply only in the side and rear yards, and that a three foot setback be applied. The three foot setback is consistent with the setback required for ornamental structures. City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 8c) Page 3 Title: 1st Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Related to Fences ORDINANCE NO. ____-16 CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 36 OF THE ST. LOUIS PARK CITY CODE RELATING TO SECTION 74-FENCE REGULATIONS WHEREAS, The City Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission (Case No. 16-28-ZA). WHEREAS, The St. Louis Park Ordinance Code, Sections 36-74 are hereby amended by adding underscored language and removing the stricken language. Section breaks are represented by ***. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK DOES ORDAIN: SECTION 1. St. Louis Park City Code Chapter 36 is amended to add the following section: Sec. 36-74. Fences. *** (b) Fence location. (1) All fences shall be located entirely upon the private property of the party requiring or requesting the construction of the fence. It shall be the responsibility of the party installing the fence to ensure that it is constructed on their private property. *** (c) Fence design. (1) Fences shall be constructed so the finished side of the fence is facing towards the neighboring properties, exposing the structural side to the party requesting the fence. Alternating board fences which have the structural elements equally visible on both sides shall be considered as complying with this section. (2) Permitted materials. Fences shall be constructed of materials designed for permanent outdoor fencing, including, but not limited to, wood, metal, bricks, masonry, and rigid plastic or vinyl. Wood fences must be constructed of naturally decay resistant wood such as cedar or redwood, or wood treated by the manufacturer to be decay resistant. (3) Prohibited materials. Fences shall not be constructed from razor wire, wood not manufactured for exterior use, or materials originally intended for other purposes. Above ground electric fence is not permitted. Barbed wire is permitted for health and safety purposes, only on top of fences in Industrial and public service uses, a minimum of six City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 8c) Page 4 Title: 1st Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Related to Fences feet above the natural grade. Chain link or metal wire fencing finer than 11-gauge in diameter is prohibited. (4) Exceptions. The following fences are exempt from the design requirements: a. Snow fences when used by institutional and public land uses exclusively for control of snow between November 1 and April 15. b. Chicken wire fencing when used to enclose a garden. c. Fences used to secure a construction site. d. Fences used to protect vegetation during construction. e. Fences used to control erosion. f. Fences used to provide screening of a patio or placed in landscaping for decorative purposes subject to the following conditions: i. The fence shall be located in the side or rear yard. ii. The fence shall be located at least three feet from the property line. g. Chain link and metal wire fences utilizing wood for the support structure shall install the chain link and metal wire on the fence owner’s side of support structure. (c) Prohibited fences. (1) Electrical fences. (2) Barbed wire fences, unless permitted by an exception. (3) Any fence, wall, hedge, or other visual obstruction of any kind which is not in compliance with section 36-76. (d) Height. The height shall be measured from the side of the fence with the lower ground level to the top of the fence or wall section. When there is a grade change between posts, then In the case where a fence has variable heights or where the ground slopes, the height of the fence shall be the average of the height measurements taken where the fence panel meets each post, but in no case shall the height of any one point exceed six inches above the maximum allowed by this section. Fence posts may exceed eight inches above the maximum allowed by this section. *** (3) Where a fence is attached to a retaining wall structure, the retaining wall shall be included in the fence height measurement. (e) Exceptions. *** (2) A fence or wall may be up to eight feet in height if placed in any side or rear yard in an R district which abuts property in the C, O, BP or I districts, or abuts a railroad right-of- way, school, church, or other public building. *** (5) Barbed wire may be used by certain industrial and public service users for health and safety purposes. However, the barbed wire cannot be used at a height lower than six feet City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 8c) Page 5 Title: 1st Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Related to Fences six inches, and the overall height of the fence including the barbed wire cannot exceed eight feet. (f) Construction and maintenance. (1) Every fence shall be constructed so the finished side of the fence is facing towards the neighboring properties, exposing the structural side to the party requiring or requesting the fence. Alternating board fences which are finished on both sides shall be considered as complying with this section. (12) Both sides of the fence shall be maintained in a condition of good repair. (23) Any fence that is potentially dangerous to the public safety or health by reason of construction or sharp projections or protrusions shall be removed or repaired. (4) Any fence over six feet in height shall be constructed of a nonmetallic material and shall be 90 percent opaque, unless the fence is used for security purposes in the I districts. (5) Any fence or wall constructed over six feet in height shall be considered a structure, require a building permit, and meet all uniform building code requirements for a structure. SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall take effect fifteen days after its publication. Public Hearing July 20, 2016 First Reading October 17, 2016 Second Reading November 7, 2016 Date of Publication November 17, 2016 Date Ordinance takes effect December 2, 2016 Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council November 7, 2016 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Approved as to Form and Execution: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Soren Mattick, City Attorney City Council Meeting of October 17, 2016 (Item No. 8c) Page 6 Title: 1st Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Related to Fences EXCERPT OF UNOFFICIAL MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA OCTOBER 5, 2016 – 6:00 p.m. COUNCIL CHAMBERS MEMBERS PRESENT: Claudia Johnston-Madison, Torrey Kanne, Richard Person, Carl Robertson, Joe Tatalovich, Ethan Rickert (youth member) MEMBERS ABSENT: Lynne Carper, Lisa Peilen STAFF PRESENT: Sean Walther, Gary Morrison, Clint Pires, Cindy Walsh 1. Call to Order – Roll Call 2. Approval of Minutes of August 17, 2016 Commissioner Tatalovich made a motion to approve the minutes of August 17, 2016. Commissioner Kanne seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 4-0-1 (Robertson abstained). 4. Other Business A. Zoning Ordinance Amendment pertaining to Fences (tabled on July 20, 2016) Applicant: City of St. Louis Park Case No.: 16-28-Z Gary Morrison, Assistant Zoning Administrator, presented the staff report. The amendment proposes to establish and clarify materials that can be used to construct a fence. He discussed the Commission’s earlier review and study session discussion of the proposed amendments. Chair Johnston-Madison asked for more detail about decorative fencing. Mr. Morrison said the rationale is to capture materials that aren’t typically used for boundary fencing. Commissioner Robertson made a motion recommending approval of the Zoning Ordinance Amendment pertaining to fences as recommended by staff. Commissioner Kanne seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 5-0.