Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2016/09/06 - ADMIN - Agenda Packets - City Council - Regular
AGENDA SEPTEMBER 6, 2016 5:45 p.m. SPECIAL STUDY SESSION – Community Room Discussion Items 1. 5:45 p.m. 2017 Budget Update 2. 6:45 p.m. Multi-Family Development Rental/Condo Market and 2016 Semi-Annual Housing Programs Activity Report Written Reports 3. Proposed Charter Amendments Related to Municipal Primary Elections and Candidate Filing Requirements 7:25 p.m. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY -- Council Chambers 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes 3a. Economic Development Authority Meeting Minutes August 15, 2016 4. Approval of Agenda 5. Reports 5a. Approval of City Disbursements 6. Old Business -- None 7. New Business 7a. 2017 Preliminary HRA Levy Certification and Budget Adoption Recommended Action: Motion to Adopt EDA Resolution authorizing the proposed levy of a special benefit levy pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 469.033, Subdivision 6, and approval of the 2017 Preliminary HRA Levy and Budget for fiscal year 2017. 8. Communications -- None 9. Adjournment 7:30 p.m. CITY COUNCIL MEETING – Council Chambers 1. Call to Order 1a. Pledge of Allegiance 1b. Roll Call 2. Presentations 2a. Best Friends Day - Twin Cities Strut Your Mutt Proclamation 2b. Retirement Recognition Resolution for Police Officer Terry Reuvers Meeting of September 6, 2016 City Council Agenda Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. To make arrangements, please call the Administration Department at 952/924-2525 (TDD 952/924-2518) at least 96 hours in advance of meeting. 3. Approval of Minutes 3a. Study Session Meeting Minutes July 25, 2016 3b. City Council Meeting Minutes August 1, 2016 3c. Study Session Minutes of August 8, 2016 3d. Special Study Session Meeting Minutes August 15, 2016 3e. City Council Meeting Minutes of August 15, 2016 4. Approval of Agenda and Items on Consent Calendar NOTE: The Consent Calendar lists those items of business which are considered to be routine and/or which need no discussion. Consent items are acted upon by one motion. If discussion is desired by either a Councilmember or a member of the audience, that item may be moved to an appropriate section of the regular agenda for discussion. The items for the Consent Calendar are listed on the last page of the Agenda. Recommended Action: Motion to approve the Agenda as presented and items listed on the Consent Calendar; and to waive reading of all resolutions and ordinances. (Alternatively: Motion to add or remove items from the agenda, or move items from Consent Calendar to regular agenda for discussion.) 5. Boards and Commissions -- None 6. Public Hearings 6a. First Reading of Ordinance Imposing a Franchise Fee on Northern States Power Co. (dba Xcel Energy) Recommended Action: Mayor to open the public hearing, solicit comments, and to close the public hearing. Motion to approve first reading of an ordinance imposing a franchise fee on Xcel Energy and set second reading for September 19, 2016. 6b. First Reading of Ordinance Imposing a Franchise Fee on CenterPoint Energy Resource Corporation Recommended Action: Mayor to open the public hearing, solicit comments, and to close the public hearing. Motion to approve first reading of an ordinance imposing a franchise fee on CenterPoint Energy Resources Corporation and set second reading for September 19, 2016. 7. Requests, Petitions, and Communications from the Public – None 8. Resolutions, Ordinances, Motions and Discussion Items 8a. Floodplain District Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments Recommended Action: Motion to approve First Reading of Ordinance amending Chapter 36, Article IV, Division 10 of the St. Louis Park Code of Ordinances relating to Floodplain Districts and amending the Official Zoning Map. 8b. Rezoning – Office Building Located at 8001 Highway 7 Recommended Action: Motion to approve First Reading of an Ordinance amending the Zoning Map to rezone the subject property from RC High-Density Multiple-Family to O Office, and set a second reading for September 19, 2016. 9. Communications – None Meeting of September 6, 2016 City Council Agenda CONSENT CALENDAR 4a. Accept for filing City Disbursement Claims for the period of July 23 through August 26, 2016. 4b. Adopt Resolution Amending and Restating the Special Use Permit for 5100 Gamble Drive. 4c. Approve Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance amending Chapter 36 of the St. Louis Park Code of Ordinances relating to zoning to amend regulations pertaining to accessory buildings and signs, and to approve the ordinance summary for publication. 4d. Approve the Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance vacating drainage utility easements, and to approve the Ordinance Summary for Publication. 4e. Approve the Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance creating Section 26-268-PUD 7 of the Zoning Code and amending the Zoning Map from C-2 General Commercial to the Planned Unit Development (PUD) 7 for the property located at 4001 and 4025 Highway 7, and approve the Summary Ordinance for publication. 4f. Approve Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance creating Section 36-268-PUD 6 of the Zoning Code and amending the Zoning Map from C-2 to PUD 6 for property located at 1601 Utica Avenue South and approve the Ordinance Summary for Publication. 4g. Approve Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance amending Section 36-268-PUD 3 relating to Arlington Row West Planned Unit Development, and to approve the summary ordinance for publication. 4h. Approve Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance amending Section 36-268-PUD 5 relating to Arlington Row East Planned Unit Development, and approve ordinance summary for publication. 4i. Approve the second reading and Adopt Ordinance amending St. Louis Park City Code Chapter 3 , Section 70 (g)(1) to Exempt Congressionally Chartered Veterans Organizations Holding a Club Liquor License from the 50% Food Ratio Requirement and to approve the summary ordinance for publication. 4j. Adopt Resolution Authorizing the 2017 Preliminary HRA Levy. 4k. Adopt Resolution approving a minor amendment to the Park Place Plaza Planned Unit Development to allow additions to the Costco building. 4l. Authorize staff to enter into an agreement with Cities Digital, Inc. to acquire the rights to use a records management software application. 4m. Adopt Resolution to recognize Police Officer Terry Reuvers for his 30 years of service to the City of St. Louis Park. 4n. Adopt Resolution authorizing the special assessment for the repair of the sewer service line at 3165 Texas Avenue South, St. Louis Park, MN. P.I.D. 17-117-21-23-0002 4o. Approve for filing Planning Commission Minutes August 3, 2016. St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority and regular City Council meetings are carried live on Civic TV cable channel 17 and replays are frequent; check www.parktv.org for the schedule. The meetings are also streamed live on the internet at www.parktv.org, and saved for Video on Demand replays. The agenda is posted on Fridays on the official city bulletin board in the lobby of City Hall and on the text display on Civic TV cable channel 17. The agenda and full packet are available by noon on Friday on the city’s website. Meeting: Special Study Session Meeting Date: September 6, 2016 Discussion Item: 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: 2017 Budget Update RECOMMENDED ACTION: No formal action required. This report and discussion is to provide an additional check in with Council prior to setting the 2017 preliminary levy. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Is the Council in support with setting a 2017 preliminary tax levy increase of 6.5% on September 19, 2016? Is the Council in support of the proposed utility rate adjustment plans? Does Council support the new information regarding solid waste program and organics? SUMMARY: At the study session on August 15, Council discussed a preliminary levy of 6.92% over last year, since that time staff has made adjustments to the building permit revenues to bring the overall levy down to 6.5%. As in past years, the 2017 preliminary property tax levy adopted by the Council on September 19, 2016, can be decreased, but cannot be increased after that date. This special study session is to provide time for discussion and a check in prior to setting the preliminary levy. During this meeting we will also review the long range financial management plan (LRFMP) for the utility funds. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Information regarding the budget, tax levies, and utility rates are provided in this report. VISION CONSIDERATION: All Vision areas are taken into consideration and are an important part of the budgeting process. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion August 15, 2016 Council Study Session Report 2017 Estimated Tax Impacts LRFMP & Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for Utility Funds Prepared by: Tim Simon, Chief Financial Officer Approved by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director Special Study Session Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 1) Page 2 Title: 2017 Budget Update DISCUSSION BACKGROUND: On August 15, 2016 Council reviewed the preliminary tax levy which at the time was 6.92%. Since that time staff has reviewed the projected building permit revenues and the timing of those revenues. We made an adjustment to increase building permit revenues $119,251. This amount ties to the estimated additional staff resources to do the required inspections that was already built into the budget. This adjustment has brought down the preliminary levy to 6.50%. We are still tracking a few items such as the health insurance renewal (preliminary numbers are coming in at a lower rate of increase than originally projected) and working on cost considerations if we receive a grant to offset the two firefighter positions. Those adjustments most likely would be made in the final levy due to the timing. 2016 City Final Levy and 2017 City Preliminary Levy A synopsis of prior year levy information and the 2017 Proposed Preliminary Levy Range is shown below: 1. The 2016 Preliminary levy was $28,738,974, which was 6.50% more than 2015. 2. The 2016 Final levy was $28,604,474, which was 6.0% more than 2015. 3. At this point in time, the budgets which have been submitted and debt service needs would require a 2017 Preliminary Property Tax Levy increase of approximately of 6.50%. 2016 2017 $ Change % Change Final Levy Proposed Levy 2016 to 2017 2016 to 2017 TAX CAPACITY BASED TAX LEVY General Fund 23,597,282$ 25,013,119$ 1,415,837$ 6.00% Park Improvement Fund 810,000 810,000 - 0.00% Capital Replacement Fund 1,767,700 1,767,700 - 0.00% Debt Service-current 1,517,667 2,139,937 622,270 41.00% Debt Service-future 477,825 300,000 (177,825) -37.22% Employee Benefit Fund 200,000 200,000 - 0.00% Housing Rehabilitation Fund 100,000 100,000 - 0.00% Council Programs (1)134,000 134,000 - 0.00% TAX CAPACITY BASED TAX LEVIES 28,604,474$ 30,464,756$ 1,860,282$ 6.50% *=levy will be adjusted as we continue the budget review. 1= Council programs line item was anticipated to be used for Council programs/initiatives like the climate action plan for 2016. For 2017, these funds may want to be considered for race and equity or community outreach type programs. HRA Levy Based on current and future infrastructure needs, the HRA Levy is recommended to be set at the maximum allowed of 0.0185% of estimated market value for the 2017 Budget, which is consistent with previous years. This levy is committed to pay back a loan from the Development Fund that helped cash flow the City’s obligation for Highway 7 and Louisiana interchange project and is expected to be paid off by 2019. By law these funds could also be used for other housing and redevelopment purposes but considering the significant infrastructure needs within the City, the proceeds have not been used for housing. Therefore, staff has calculated the maximum HRA Levy for 2017 to be $1,086,461 based on valuation data from Hennepin County. This is an increase of $75,253 or 7.44% from 2016. Staff is recommending the 2017 Preliminary HRA Levy be set at the maximum. Special Study Session Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 1) Page 3 Title: 2017 Budget Update Budget Webpage and E-mail: As Council is aware, in an effort to provide a more transparent budget process, staff has created a webpage on the City’s website and an e-mail address for any questions that arise. The link is: http://www.stlouispark.org/finance/city-budget.html and the e-mail address is: budget@stlouispark.org. Trends in Valuations and Possible Property Tax Implications: For the 2016 assessment, St. Louis Park’s taxable market value increased by 8.1% with all of the dominant property types increasing in value. Composition of the change is summarized as +5.3% for single-family homes, +10.6 for condos, +6.7 for townhomes, +17.8% for apartments, and the commercial-industrial sectors at +9.6%. As can be surmised by the above figures, there will be a shift of the property tax burden to commercial, condos, and apartment properties for the Payable 2017 tax period. This shift will be mitigated somewhat when considering all taxing jurisdictions that make up the typical property tax bill (in the aggregate, other County jurisdictions increased at higher rates for single-family homes but at lower rates for apartments and commercial properties). Utility Funds: All utility funds will be presented during the budget process as in previous years with a review of rates in accordance with the City’s Long Range Financial Management Plan (LRFMP). As in previous years, all utility rates are analyzed and adjusted as needed to meet operational and capital needs, while also working to meet appropriate cash position guidelines. Water: For 2017, the City will be in the seventh year of the ten year plan for increasing the fixed rate charges to reduce volatility in the fund due to seasonality usage fluctuations. Usage rates will also be increased to meet more aggressive demands for infrastructure replacement within the City’s aging system. Water mains within the programmed pavement management areas are evaluated for age, condition and number of breaks. Sections that are more than 70 years old, in poor condition, or have had more than five breaks are considered for replacement. Significant expenses for this fund are capital, staffing, the Reilly Superfund site and debt service. Staff is anticipating to issue bonds in the amount of $5m in 2017 and future bond issues in 2019 and 2023. These bonds will be repaid with utility revenues. The rate change is consistent with last year at seven percent. Staff will further study water conservation, irrigation and rates to prepare for recommendations for 2018. Sewer: Rates are also expected to increase due to the City’s more aggressive infrastructure replacement plan. In conjunction with the Water bond issue we anticipate issuing a bond in the amount of $1.75m in 2017. These bonds will be repaid with utility revenues. Sewer costs are mainly to support the Metropolitan Council of Environmental Services charge (MCES), staffing and capital costs. The rate change has been reduced to seven percent in 2017 as compared to 8 percent last year. Storm Water: With the interest the Council and community has in surface water, staff will continue to develop, modify, connect and communicate programs to both the City Council and the community. With the updated 10-year plan staff has reduced the rate increases down to 2.5 percent for 2017 as compared to 10 percent last year. These increases will help meet the increased capital needs and debt service obligations. Significant expenses for this fund currently are capital and staffing. Special Study Session Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 1) Page 4 Title: 2017 Budget Update New information - Solid Waste with Organics program update: Staff is recommending changes to the Organics program in accordance with discussions with Council. The recommendation from staff (operations and recreation) is to offer Organics service to all and incorporate costs into a revised rate structure to continue to increase Organics in 2017. As discussed with Council, despite numerous attempts to increase participation by conducting ongoing education at community events, through direct mail and social media, a temporary incentive offering a half year of free service, and compostable bag pick-up at two city buildings, the number of households participating as of August 2016 had an increase of only 4% over the previous year. With the following recommendations for changes to the solid waste rate model (shown below) it is anticipated that we may double the current participation rate from 15% to 30% in 2017. Changes to Solid Waste Basic Service – include organics option for all in the standard rate Staff recommends including organics recycling service as part of the standard rate for solid waste services (garbage, recycling and yard waste) for all residential customers in 2017. This would allow residents to just opt-in for the service, at no extra charge. The City of Minneapolis uses this model, charging all households for organics, and has approximately 38% of households opting-in. St. Louis Park’s current rate model only includes garbage, recycling, and yard waste, and charges a separate fee ($10 per quarter) for organics recycling. The participation rate for the city’s organics recycling program is currently 15%. Organics carts would still only be delivered once the resident opts-in, to ensure that those who receive carts are provided the education and are willing to do it right, reducing the likelihood of contamination. Also, residents would still select their cart size upon sign-up. Staff would create a comprehensive public outreach campaign to explain program changes and promote sign-ups throughout the city, starting in spring 2017. The fee schedule below is the example of how rates will look when organics are included. This rate structure also continues to support a “pay as you throw” model to increase waste reduction while encouraging use of the recycling and organics programs. 2016 Rate (Qtrly) New Rate (2017/2018 Level) Change 20 gallon 30.00$ 28.00$ (2.00)$ 30 gallon 49.50$ 46.50$ (3.00)$ 60 gallon 67.50$ 69.00$ 1.50$ 90 gallon 99.00$ 105.75$ 6.75$ 120 gallon 144.00$ 168.00$ 24.00$ 150 gallon 180.00$ 210.00$ 30.00$ 180 gallon 216.00$ 252.00$ 36.00$ 270 gallon 324.00$ 378.00$ 54.00$ 360 gallon 432.00$ 504.00$ 72.00$ 450 gallon 540.00$ 630.00$ 90.00$ 540 gallon 648.00$ 756.00$ 108.00$ Special Study Session Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 1) Page 5 Title: 2017 Budget Update Changes to Compostable Bag Distribution Another change staff recommends after 2017, is to switch to a one-time starter kit that includes a small number of compostable bags, educational information, and coupons to subsidize the cost of purchasing bags at local stores. The proposed solid waste rate model does not include the ongoing distribution of bags to existing customers after 2017. Moving away from providing an annual supply of compostable bags follows a model used by City of Minneapolis, and is more sustainable given the projected participation increases expected with the new rate model. NEXT STEPS: As the 2017 budget process continues, the following preliminary schedule snapshot has been developed for Council: September 6 (Tues) 2017 Preliminary HRA Levy to be considered at both the EDA & City Council meetings. September 19 Council sets 2017 preliminary property tax levy. October 10 Review and discussion of 2017 budget, CIP, fees, utility rates and LRFMP. Directors or their designees in attendance as needed. October 17 Public Hearing - 1st Reading of Fees and adoption of 2017 Utility Rates. November 7 Budget and continued CIP discussions prior to Truth in Taxation Public Hearing and Budget Presentation. 2nd Reading of Fee on Consent. December 5 Truth in Taxation Public Hearing and Budget Presentation. December 12 Continuation of Public Hearing and any budget discussion. (If necessary.) December 19 Council adopts 2016 Revised Budget, 2017 Budgets, final tax levies (City and HRA), and 2017 - 2026 CIP. Meeting: Special Study Session Meeting Date: August 15, 2016 Discussion Item: 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: 2017 Budget Update RECOMMENDED ACTION: No formal action required. This report is to assist with the Study Session discussion regarding the 2017 Budget and to receive direction for further conversation at the September 6th Special Study Session, in preparation for setting the 2017 Preliminary Property Tax Levy on September 19, 2016. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Is the levy range at this time within target levels for Council based on services levels provided? Does the Council want to certify the maximum HRA levy amount for the 2017 levy? Is the Council in support of the proposed utility rate adjustment plans? Is there other information that Council would like to review in more detail? Are there any other service delivery changes Council would like to have considered? SUMMARY: Included is information pertaining to the 2017 Budget and 2017 Preliminary General Property Tax and HRA levies. The City Manager and staff are currently analyzing submitted budgets for 2017. Also included in the report are some items of significance that are being considered. In addition, staff would like direction on any other major changes, programs, or policies that should be evaluated during the preparation of the 2017 Budget. Finally, there is a brief discussion on utility rates. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Information regarding the budget, tax levies, and utility rates are provided in this report. VISION CONSIDERATION: All Vision areas are taken into consideration and are an important part of the budgeting process. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion Follow-up Questions from June 20th Budget Study Session Prepared by: Tim Simon, Chief Financial Officer Reviewed by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Special Study Session Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: 2017 Budget Update Page 6 DISCUSSION BACKGROUND: On June 20, 2016, staff met with the City Council to discuss the 2017 Budget Process. Council agreed that staff should follow recommendations from the “2017 Budget Production Guidelines” when preparing the 2017 Budget. Assumptions for the 2017 Budget included a pattern similar to past years; a levy increase, modest increase in other fees and charges where appropriate to fit with business costs, maintain high quality and responsive service delivery, hold expenditures flat where possible with adjustments for some modest growth based on essential business needs, funding for a wage and benefit contribution increase, utility rate adjustments, and continued long range financial planning. In addition, Council discussed business needs and operations as it related to preparing the 2017 budget. Staff has provided follow up information as an attachment to this report. Discussion Topics – Monday, August 15th: The purpose of the Study Session discussion is to make sure service delivery and business needs are congruent with Council expectations in preparing the 2017 Budget. For 2017, staff used the budget guiding principles, as well as Vision, and the new key organizational cultural behaviors of Collaboration, Quality and Responsiveness for preparing budget recommendations. The Study Session discussion is intended to be at the higher level to allow Council, if possible, to provide levy direction to staff as well as identify other initiatives they would like staff to add or explore. Based upon this discussion, staff can then prepare more information to bring back to the City Council as needed at a later date. Below is the outline of the budget presentation and discussion for this Study Session: 1. Discussion on overall budget, department requests, and council requested items for staff to explore. 2. 2017 Preliminary Property Tax Levy range discussion. 3. 2017 Preliminary HRA Levy discussion. 4. Council questions, comments, expectations, and data requests for upcoming meetings, including the budget calendar. Budget Webpage and E-mail: As Council is aware, in an effort to provide a more transparent budget process, staff has created a webpage on the City’s website and an e-mail address for any questions that arise. The link is: http://www.stlouispark.org/finance/city-budget.html and the e-mail address is: budget@stlouispark.org. The 2017 Preliminary Budget Items of Significance: Legislative directives: There are no levy limits in place for 2017. Local Government Aid for 2017 has been certified, St. Louis Park will receive $545,470 which is $6,036 more than the $539,434 certified for 2016. These dollars go into the Capital Replacement Fund. Staffing Costs wages: Funds for staffing are the largest expenditure of the City’s operating budget. In building the 2017 budget recommendations, a wage adjustment of 2.75% is being used as an assumption. As a reminder, Dispatch and Local 49 Maintenance contracts are settled for two years 2016 & 2017, Patrol and Sergeants are still in active negotiations for 2016, Fire settled for one year and is open in 2017. Special Study Session Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: 2017 Budget Update Page 7 PERA Coordinated Plan: Employee contribution of 6.50% of salary and employer contribution of 7.50% of salary in 2016 will remain the same at this point in 2017. PERA Police and Fire: Employee contribution of 10.8% and employer contribution of 16.2% in 2016 will remain the same at this point in 2017. Benefits: For 2017, staff is working on renewal with our current carrier Health Partners on renewal rates. We have 2 years (2017 & 2018) before we have to go out for formal bids and have asked for rates for both one and two years. Based on our experience and trend we estimated and recommended an overall increase of 12% for 2017 (built into the 2017 budget at this time). The good news is based on preliminary information, it appears that rates will come in lower than 12%. We will have more information on rates in the near future. Staff continues to work with the City’s benefits consultant and internal benefits committee on cost containment on claims. The wellness benefit for 2016 was set at $40 per employee per month and is recommended to remain the same in 2017. Operational Costs: Staff is being asked to look at how operational costs have been changing with the ever changing market conditions, as well as planning ahead for operational needs with focus areas relating to the environment, trails and sidewalks, transportation, ongoing development, continued strength in public safety, fire prevention, neighborhoods and housing. Energy costs will continue to be monitored closely given the potential for volatility in this sector of the economy. Summary of Significant 2017 Budget Personnel Requests: The most significant requests received from departments in the 2017 budget relate to staffing. All requests are in the process of being reviewed by the City Manager with each applicable Department Director. In order to determine the final recommendations staff will continue to review business needs and funding and also look at alternatives for service delivery with some requests and moving some requests to future year(s) for consideration. Below is the summary of staffing requests and funding recommendations. Note – these are the staffing requests made by Department Directors and do not constitute at this time a recommendation from the City Manager. What staffing additions or changes are requested at this time for 2017? Administrative Services - Election Judges - $45,000 (decrease) – Cyclical for Presidential election and municipal primary elections. General Fund is the funding source. Administrative Services – Appraiser I – $90,119 – FT benefit earning – Increase in assessing volume and workload, would replace part-time position of $32,068 (decrease) if approved. General Fund is the funding source. Fire Department - Overtime - $56,250 – Increase suggested based on call volume, new family leave policy, staff development, and staff engagement. General Fund is the funding source. Fire Department - Paid on Call (POC) - $8,000 – Increase in wage adjustment. General Fund is the funding source. Fire Department – Supplemental pay - $12,350 – Increase in fire prevention assignments with two more in 2017. General Fund is the funding source. Fire Department - 2 Firefighters - FT benefit earning - $191,252 - Increase in call volume and demand for service. The fire department has applied for an AFG SAFER grant which would cover the cost of the positions for the first two years. More information on the grant Special Study Session Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: 2017 Budget Update Page 8 should be coming in the next few weeks. Funding source if the grant is not approved would be General Fund. Note that the Fire Department requested three new fire fighter positions last year. One firefighter position was recommended by the City Manager and approved by the Council with a start date of July 1, 2016. If the grant is not approved the City Manager will likely recommend a similar approach for 2017 (add one firefighter) Inspections – Temporary Construction Codes Inspector - $92,251- PT benefit earning – To allow for increased inspection services over the next 18 months assuming construction continues or grows from the current pace and a number of significant building permits come in later this year. General Fund is the funding source with potential additional building permit revenue offset. Inspections- Overtime adjustment- $11,569- Increased inspections due to the number of inspections activity. General Fund is the funding source. Police – Intern - $22,728 – To provide support and assistance to staff working on programs and initiatives that provide a high level of service to the community. General Fund is the funding source. Police-temporary employees - $12,000 – Increase CSO/Cadet positions pay range. General fund is the funding source. Operations and Recreation – Rec., Rec. Center, Pool & Outdoor facility – Temporary salaries- $46,950 – Minimum wage increases and temporary employees for new outdoor facility. General Fund is the funding source. Operations and Recreation – Park Maintenance – Temporary salaries – $12,000 –Minimum wage increases and market adjustment for pay range. General Fund is the funding source. Operations and Recreation- Westwood – Temporary salaries - $6,200 – Minimum wage increases and market adjustment for pay range. General Fund is the funding source. Operations and Recreation – Solid Waste – Recycling Intern - $22,729 – To assist with delivery of solid waste council initiatives including work on GIS data for the program. Solid Waste enterprise fund is the funding source. Summary of Significant 2017 Budget Non-personnel Requests That Are Included: Administrative Services – Increased expenditure projections came in for estimated property, liability and casualty insurance - $10,586. Recodify the city and zoning code and implement online hosting feature - $18,300. Adjust legal fees to historical actuals - $22,000. Implement a healthy living grants program - $15,000. In addition, decrease in revenues and expenditures for Health in the Park program that ends in 2016. Engineering – Increase of $20,000 for right of way permit revenues to reflect prior actuals. Fire – The cumulative increase in expenditures is approximately $35,000 for supplies, small tools, repairs, ARMOR leasing & HC radio costs, increased compliance testing or equipment, CERT member training, professional development and wellness. Information Resources – Increase of $7,500 for environmentally preferable purchasing policy and $10,000 other contractual services in communications/marketing. Inspections – Proposed increase of permit revenues of approximately $125,000 based on historical and projected projects in 2017. Facility Maintenance utility costs are estimated Special Study Session Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: 2017 Budget Update Page 9 to increase $17,000 to purchase wind power credits, which would only be for the buildings overseen by facilities maintenance. Operations and Recreation – Revenues are projected to increase by $330,000 due to rink renovations being complete and back to normalized ice rental, program fee changes and new outdoor facility. On the expenditure side, proposed increase for Public Works Operations of $40,000 for additional concrete alley, sidewalks, curb and gutter repairs. Additional funds for the outdoor facility have been planned including concessions, advertising, and contractual services. Police - The budget requests funds to replace the 23 year old “throw phone” for the crisis negotiation team - $22,000. In addition, funds are requested to replace 20 year old squad car rifles - $58,000. Since these are one-time expenses and the contingency has not been used YTD, staff is recommending that these items are purchased using the 2016 contingency line item and removed from the 2017 budget. Contingency – We are currently working with a consultant to review and recommend updates to our compensation plan. Our current plan has been in place since 1997. Part of the study is to review our current compensation program, paygrades and ranges and pay equity compliance. The compensation plan review will also look closely at how we compare to market with all of our employee groups. The market we have used and recommend that we continue to use for comparison is metro cities population greater than 25,000 but less than 90,000 (up to and including Bloomington, MN). Under our current program, the compensation plan requires a difference in salary comparison when looking at the exempt and non-exempt market. When reviewing salaries in the market, our current program requires comparison at the 75th percentile level for exempt (non-overtime eligible), and for non-exempt to compare at market average or 50th percentile. As part of this study, we are looking at moving the non-exempt market comparison up to 75th percentile, allowing the same level of market comparison for all positions exempt and non- exempt. The same type of formula used for salary comparison provides a more equitable comparison (same standards/metrics used) regardless if eligible for overtime or not. This standardized approach is more commonly found in the public sector market rather than a split when comparing market. Salary ranges and management practices would be used to manage overall compensation. This type of change in market comparison for non-exempt positions will also help with recruitment. To implement this type of plan, funds will need to be set aside to allow for possible additional movement in the pay ranges. The General Fund contingency budget is recommended to have $386,295 set aside for this change for 2017, which includes 1% of personal expenses for possible compensation plan adjustment (movement if there is a change in grade level). In addition setting aside funds if we implement phasing in and using a market comparison of 75th percentile for non-exempt (overtime eligible) staff. Staff plans to bring this information regarding updating the compensation plan to Council at an upcoming study session. Cable TV Fund – Staff recommends continuing with the plan to reduce the transfer from the Cable TV Fund to the General Fund by $25,000 per year. Reducing the annual transfer by $25,000 each year through 2019 and by $34,506 in 2020 will improve sustainability in the fund until the franchise fee agreement expires in 2021. At that point, if no new agreement is available, the fund could operate through 2022 and into early 2023 before running out of resources as currently budgeted. Special Study Session Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: 2017 Budget Update Page 10 Fees, Charges and Other Revenues - Staff will continue to review current fee data based on cost analyses and other communities before making recommendations for the 2017 Fee Schedules for the Council to consider later this year. CIP (Capital Improvement Plan) - Staff has completed the first and second round work on the CIP, and a draft will be provided on September 6th. This information has been programmed into the LRFMP, and Finance is analyzing the results in an effort to create long-term sustainability in funds and is also looking at where changes in funding or expenditures/expenses need to occur for the City Council and City Manager to consider. LRFMP (Long Range Financial Management Plan): This document will be presented at future meetings with Council to assist in setting property tax levies, debt management, fees, utility rates and budgets. Trends in Valuations and Possible Property Tax Implications: For the 2016 assessment, St. Louis Park’s taxable market value increased by 8.1% with all of the dominant property types increasing in value. Composition of the change is summarized as +5.3% for single-family homes, +10.6 for condos, +6.7 for townhomes, +17.8% for apartments, and the commercial-industrial sectors at +9.6%. As can be surmised by the above figures, there will be a shift of the property tax burden to commercial, condos, and apartment properties for the Payable 2017 tax period. This shift will be mitigated somewhat when considering all taxing jurisdictions that make up the typical property tax bill (in the aggregate, other County jurisdictions increased at higher rates for single-family homes but at lower rates for apartments and commercial properties). Fiscal Disparities: The City’s proposed net tax capacity contribution increased by $1,086,206 or approximately 34% for 2017. In 2016, the net tax capacity contribution decreased by $710,663 or approximately 18.3%. 2016 City Final Levy and 2017 City Preliminary Levy Range A synopsis of prior year levy information and the 2017 Proposed Preliminary Levy Range is shown below: 1. The 2016 Preliminary levy was $28,738,974, which was 6.50% more than 2015. 2. The 2016 Final levy was $28,604,474, which was 6.0% more than 2015. 3. At this point in time, the budgets which have been submitted and debt service needs would require a 2017 Preliminary Property Tax Levy range increase of approximately 6.50% - 7.00% more than the 2016 Final Levy. The levy will be discussed in further detail at the September 6th budget work session. Special Study Session Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: 2017 Budget Update Page 11 2016 2017 $ Change % Change Final Levy Proposed Levy 2016 to 2017 2016 to 2017 TAX CAPACITY BASED TAX LEVY General Fund 23,597,282$ 25,131,105$ 1,533,823$ 6.50% Park Improvement Fund 810,000 810,000 - 0.00% Capital Replacement Fund 1,767,700 1,767,700 - 0.00% Debt Service-current 1,517,667 2,139,937 622,270 41.00% Debt Service-future 477,825 300,000 (177,825) -37.22% Employee Benefit Fund 200,000 200,000 - 0.00% Housing Rehabilitation Fund 100,000 100,000 - 0.00% Council Programs (1)134,000 134,000 - 0.00% TAX CAPACITY BASED TAX LEVIES 28,604,474$ 30,582,742$ 1,978,268$ 6.92% *=levy will be adjusted as we continue the budget review. 1= Council programs line item was anticipated to be used for Council programs/initiatives like the climate action plan for 2016. For 2017, these funds may want to be considered for race and equity or community outreach type programs. HRA Levy Based on current and future infrastructure needs, the HRA Levy is recommended to be set at the maximum allowed of 0.0185% of estimated market value for the 2017 Budget, which is consistent with previous years. This levy is committed to pay back a loan from the Development Fund that helped cash flow the City’s obligation for Highway 7 and Louisiana and is expected to be paid off by 2019. By law these funds could also be used for other housing and redevelopment purposes but considering the significant infrastructure needs within the City, the proceeds have not been used for housing. Therefore, staff has calculated the maximum HRA Levy for 2017 to be $1,086,460 based on valuation data from Hennepin County. This is an increase of $75,253 or 7.44% from 2016. Staff is recommending the 2017 Preliminary HRA Levy be set at the maximum. Utility Funds: All utility funds will be presented during the budget process as in previous years with a review of rates in accordance with the City’s Long Range Financial Management Plan (LRFMP). As in previous years, all utility rates are analyzed and adjusted as needed to meet operational and capital needs, while also working to meet appropriate cash position guidelines. Water: For 2017, the City will be in the seventh year of the ten year plan for increasing the fixed rate charges to reduce volatility in the fund due to seasonality usage fluctuations. Usage rates will also be increased to meet more aggressive demands for infrastructure replacement within the City’s aging system. Significant expenses for this fund are capital, staffing, the Reilly Superfund site and debt service. Staff will further study water conservation, irrigation and rates to prepare for recommendations for 2018. Sewer: Rates are also expected to increase due to the City’s more aggressive infrastructure replacement plan. Sewer costs are mainly to support the Metropolitan Council of Environmental Services charge (MCES), staffing and capital costs. Solid Waste: Rates for this fund are expected to increase slightly to continue to support more of a pay as you throw type rate structure. Rates may also increase depending on any enhanced or new initiatives the Council would like to pursue with single family organics and multi-family recycling and organics. The major expenses for this fund are the contract charges and staffing. Special Study Session Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: 2017 Budget Update Page 12 Storm Water: With the interest the Council and community has in surface water, staff will continue to develop, modify, connect and communicate programs to both the City Council and the community. Based on Council direction to place more emphasis on storm water management, along with increasing regulations, rates will need to continue to be adjusted over the next three to four years. These increases will help meet the increased capital needs and debt service obligations. Significant expenses for this fund currently are capital and staffing. NEXT STEPS: As the 2017 budget process continues, the following preliminary schedule snapshot has been developed for Council: September 6 (Tues) High level 2017 Budget, CIP (first draft), and utility rates discussion. Department Directors or their designees will also be in attendance as needed. This meeting will be more of a proposed preliminary levy discussion with direction provided to staff to prepare information for the September 19th meeting adopting preliminary levies. In addition, the EDA and City Council will adopt the HRA levy. September 19 Council sets 2017 preliminary property tax levy. (Levies can be decreased, but not increased for final property tax levies.) October 10 Review and discussion of 2017 budget, CIP, fees, utility rates and LRFMP. Directors or their designees in attendance as needed. October 17 Public Hearing - 1st Reading of Fees, and adoption of 2017 Utility Rates November 7 (If necessary) Final budget or CIP discussion prior to Truth in Taxation Public Hearing and budget presentation. 2nd Reading of Fee on Consent. December 5 Truth in Taxation Public Hearing and budget presentation December 12 (If necessary) Continuation of Public Hearing and any budget discussion. December 19 Council adopts 2016 Revised Budget, 2017 Budgets, final tax levies (City and HRA), and 2017 - 2026 CIP. Special Study Session Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: 2017 Budget Update Page 13 Follow-up Questions from June 20th Budget Study Session At the Study Session on June 20th, 2016, Council discussed business needs and operations as it related to preparing the 2017 budget. As part of the discussion, there were requests for information and follow-up on a number of areas. Listed below are the questions from the study sessions and department responses. More information can be provided if needed. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Council Meeting Facilitation QUESTION: High School uses an equity coach for the Board in some discussions; what would it cost for us? ANSWER: We bring in a facilitator to the annual Council workshop and to other public meetings as needed. Funds are available in our general fund under professional services if Council would like to do something similar. If Council is interested in doing this on a more regular basis, we should have a discussion to help define what type of facilitation is desired. Facilities Study QUESTION: When will Council have a conversation on the Facilities Study: Funding for Civic Center, Teen Center etc. planning, consultant, and analysis? Will we work with the school or independently? ANSWER: Thus far a sub group of the City Council and School Board have been meeting to discuss facilities. More information should be available this fall. As for the Teen Center, CEAC has become engaged in this initiative and will be presented more info in September. Future study session time will need to be set with Council for this conversation and to further define community need, scope, timeframe, possible partnerships and funding. Race and Equity Funding QUESTION: What funding is needed to continue working on this initiative? ANSWER: For 2016, funding is in place to provide training for staff. For 2017, funding will be set aside to assist as we continue to move ahead with our Race and Equity initiatives and communication. Benefits QUESTION: Where are we compared to other cities with benefits, i.e. are we competitive? ANSWER: Comparing benefit plans can be complex since the specific plan designs and details of each plan can vary drastically. However, in plans similar to our most utilized plan, St. Louis Park employees appear to receive a significantly better benefit if they choose employee only health insurance, and very near the market average benefit for family health insurance. St. Louis Park employees receive a higher contribution than any other city to a health savings account or reimbursement arrangement for a high deductible health plan. See more detail on following page. Special Study Session Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: 2017 Budget Update Page 14 Human Resources has surveyed other metro suburban cities with populations between 25,000 and 90,000 (our standard market comparable cities) and compared employee cost for benefits most similar to St. Louis Park’s $2500/$5000 high deductible plan with VEBA. The table below shows how St. Louis Park’s out of pocket benefit costs compare to others in our market: Market Average Employee Monthly Cost St. Louis Park Employee Monthly Cost Comments Employee Only Coverage ($70.62) This reflects an average amount the employee receives in cash back to purchase other benefits. ($166.00) SLP employees can use these funds to purchase dental insurance, supplemental life insurance, or make a deferred compensation contribution. Individual responses from cities ranged from employees receiving as much as ($448.50) back each month, to employees being required to contribute up to $165.55 for employee only coverage. St. Louis Park employees receive significantly more than average benefit for employee only coverage. Family Coverage $542.51 $551.00 Individual responses ranged from a low employee cost of $230.16 to a high of $1,077.32. St. Louis Park employees pay slightly higher than average for family coverage. Annual City Contribution to Family Health Savings Account or Health Reimbursement Arrangement (HSA or HRA/VEBA) $1,785.64 $3,500.00 Individual responses ranged from cities not even offering an HSA/HRA to contributing as much as $3,460.00 per year. St. Louis Park had the highest contribution. Special Study Session Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: 2017 Budget Update Page 15 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STEP Funding QUESTION: What is the current level of funding contribution for STEP and should the city promote a private matching program? What is our current rental assistance funding and should more funds go to STEP for this program? ANSWER: The annual City contribution to STEP was $45,000 this year. In 2017 we are proposing a 2% increase. It is further recommended that the contribution to STEP be automatically increased for subsequent years by 2% In addition we have provided a $15,000 onetime contribution for STEP’s Emergency Assistance fund which almost exclusively provides rent assistance to families experiencing a temporary financial crises. This money is leveraging a contribution from the Park Nicollet Foundation. Walker/Lake Street Area QUESTION: Are there funds for future planning, consulting, and analysis for the Walker/Lake Street area? What is the timeframe for this analysis in this specific area? ANSWER: Ideally we will have an Activation Plan done this winter and start implementing improvements in the area in the summer 2017. An “Activation Plan” is a term used by the consultant to refer to the next steps/implementation plan for bringing vitality to the area. Housing QUESTION: What do we need to do to keep, invest in and maintain naturally occurring affordable housing? ANSWER: Recently, staff participated in a meeting of the SWLRT Housing Committee which includes representatives from all the cities along the corridor as well as Hennepin County, Met Council, MN Housing, Family Housing Fund and Twin Cities LISC. One of the agenda topics was the preservation of naturally occurring affordable housing. A follow‐up meeting to explore this topic in greater detail has been scheduled for August 11. Also note that ULI has indicated that this is a topic that has come up with the Regional Council of Mayors (of which Michele Schnitker is a member) and that ULI would like to propose working with the SWLRT Housing Group on regional/local initiatives related to this issue. We’ve asked our city attorney to review the recommendations made by the Housing Justice Center to help cities preserve affordable housing. Given that some of the recommendations involve the city implementing official controls/ordinances to preserve housing, we want to know if any of the measures would require legislative action to authorize cities to do so. Staff will also be meeting in the near future with Jeremy Schroeder of the Minnesota Housing Partnership to discuss this issue and the recent initiatives undertaken by MHP to establish the Homegrown Fund, a metropolitan‐wide funding source to assist in the preservation of affordable housing units. QUESTION: How do we make sure we continue funding and communication of programs such as Blackstone assistance with rehab? Communication on our programs? ANSWER: We use a variety of methods to get the word out on housing assistance programs offered by the City. Articles related to the programs are included in the Park Perspective, information is included on the City’s web page and we have utilized the utility billing mailings to distribute information in the past. Information is also distributed at the Annual Remodeling Fair and Home Remodeling Tour and various City functions like the Fire Open House. Special Study Session Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: 2017 Budget Update Page 16 ENGINEERING Connect the Park QUESTION: Is there funding for additional areas if requested and to connect the disconnected portions that just end without connecting to system. ANSWER: Yes for specific disconnected portions. As a part of the CIP process last spring, we added the cost to construct “additional areas if requested to connect the disconnected portions” i.e. gaps. We have not included a cost to construct sidewalks on streets where no sidewalks exist today or where there is sidewalk on one side of the street and not on the other. If new segments are requested/added we would need to plan for this type of addition and determine cost and funding source. Our gaps analysis strictly looked at segments where the sidewalk ends and does not connect to the network. INSPECTIONS/FACILITIES Energy Efficiency Improvements for Facilities QUESTION: Can you provide information on how the Climate Action Plan results and recommendations will be incorporated into the budget? ANSWER: The initial energy conserving improvements started in 2009 that were identified during the McKinstry energy audit are being completed in 2016. Also, through regular facilities evaluation and the process of planning for building and equipment maintenance, the proposed CIP continues to include many items for enhancing energy conservation. With the lowering cost and improvements in panel efficiency, installation of a roof mounted photo‐voltaic system on the MSC is included to begin city generation of renewable energy. In addition to reducing the carbon footprint, payback on investment is now available in 10‐15 year range depending on various Xcel programs and development options. Other opportunities will be evaluated through the Climate Action Plan consultants work and integrated into future CIP proposals for consideration. Once we have the information from the Climate Action Plan we will incorporate them into our plans. OPERATIONS AND RECREATION Outdoor Rec Facilities Maintenance QUESTION: With all the expansion on facilities in Recreation do we need more maintenance? ANSWER: The current plan is to operate the new outdoor recreation facility with part‐ time/seasonal staff. We have the ability to have more time scheduled at the Rec Center during March‐May and September‐October, when the shared position is normally working out of the MSC in Parks/Public Works/Utilities; this would reduce the staff level at the MSC during the aforementioned time period. Staff will plan to review the first year of operation and present Council with any additional staffing requests for the 2018 budget. Rec Center Maintenance QUESTION: Rec Center maintenance and facelift needed, cleaning, rusty window sills and bathrooms. It’s very important that this facility be cleaned and upgraded. What is the maintenance plan? ANSWER: To assist with maintenance needs we contract cleaning service of the Rec Center and increased service level hours in 2015. We currently have contracted cleaning 5 out of 7 days/week in the evening, the other 2 days are covered by our Rec Center maintenance staff. In the fall of 2016 the mirrors and fixtures in the main bathroom will be replaced. There is $175,000 Special Study Session Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: 2017 Budget Update Page 17 for exterior building repair in the 2016 CIP and we plan to address this area once all of the current construction is complete. If there are other specific needs staff would like more detailed information. Below is a schedule of upcoming improvements: 2017 Upgrade banquet room furniture $15,000 Update building pneumatics $200,000 Replace hot water heater/tank $20,000 Replace office carpeting $17,000 Replace pool filters $200,000 Upgrade pool pumps $20,000 Upgrade concession stand equipment $20,000 2018 Remodel/paint Gallery & Banquet Room $50,000 Upgrade front entrance $120,000 Replace landscaping $15,000 Replace east arena roof $500,000 Replace west area upper windows $40,000 2019 Upgrade banquet room furniture $15,000 Replace front office AC unit $75,000 East rink locker room remodel $50,000 East rink scoreboard replacement $30,000 Replace pool deck furniture $5,000 2020 Aquatic park amenity replacement $300,000 Banquet room PA upgrade $50,000 Add marquee $200,000 Replace sun shelters $60,000 Replace skate rentals $10,000 Parking lot seal $10,000 Replace aquatic park main drains $25,000 Concession stand equipment upgrade $5,000 2021 Replace pool deck furniture $5,000 Arena compressor rebuild $15,000 Replace rubber flooring $250,000 Dasherboard maintenance/upkeep/replace $25,000 Replace landscaping $15,000 Replace skate rentals $10,000 Special Study Session Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: 2017 Budget Update Page 18 The list below shows improvements made at the Rec Center since 2010 Replaced skate tile in west locker rooms ($45,000) Upgraded pool showers ($104,000) Relocated Skate Shop ($20,000) Upgraded East Rink dehumidification ($300,000) Upgraded rink lights (2011, $51,000) Upgraded West Rink Locker Rooms ($100,000) Upgraded parking lot medians ($10,000) Drain replacement in Aquatic Park ($30,000) Addressed ADA access to Pool/Rec Center ($30,000) Updated banquet room and gallery ($40,000) Added concession stand AC ($50,000) New skate rentals ($12,000) Upgraded fire alarm ($80,000) Replaced banquet room furniture ($12,000) Painted East Arena ($40,000) Replaced program office windows ($20,000) Resurfaced pool ($260,000) Resurfaced water slides ($90,000) Painted West Arena ($50,000) Upgraded pool amenities ($75,000) Re‐keyed building ($15,000) Re‐landscaped Aquatic Park ($80,000) Replace banquet room carpet ($35,000); to be completed in Fall 2016 Pool Lifespan QUESTION: What is the lifespan of the pool and are we planning for upkeep/upgrades if needed? ANSWER: We have schedule to replace/significantly upgrade the aquatic park in 2023 ($10,000,000). Boulevard Trees QUESTION: Can you provide information on what it would cost if the city shifted to 100% cost coverage for boulevard trees? ANSWER: Currently we split the boulevard tree removal 50/50 with the homeowner. The City spends $65,000 to remove boulevard trees. If a policy change was made to cover 100% of removal, an additional $65,000 would be needed for a total of $130,000. We need to keep in mind that this amount will increase when Emerald Ash Borer arrives in St. Louis Park. When it does, the cost of removal could go from $130,000 to $400,000 using a 100% funding model. Special Study Session Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: 2017 Budget Update Page 19 Reilly QUESTION: Is additional funding needed for Reilly and/or what can be done to mitigate and come to resolution? ANSWER: At this time, no additional funds are expected in the near future for administrative efforts (beyond what’s already been requested in the budget). Once WTP4 & WTP6 are upgraded (approximately 2018‐2020 timeframe), annual O&M costs are expected to rise $50‐$80K for each plant due to the additional treatment technologies. In addition, staff has been working with Lockridge Grindall on amendments to the Consent Decree to mitigate the expense of unnecessary but required testing. Organics QUESTION: How are we going to move ahead with Organics to incent or provide for all residents? ANSWER: Staff will present options for moving forward to encourage and increase organics participation this fall of as part of our 2017 budget discussions. This will include how to incent to gain more participation with organics, and communication and education plans. Sidewalk Snowplowing QUESTION: What would it cost to plow all city sidewalks using seasonal staff, contracting, use of overtime and what is our current cost for sidewalk plowing? ANSWER: What is the cost using part‐time/seasonal staff? - Five additional sidewalk routes would be required to clear the “residential” sidewalk segments. - We anticipate each route would require approximately 500 labor hours for a total of 2500 labor hours. - An average seasonal employee rate is estimated at $25/hour, but may need to be higher to attract competent operators willing to remain on standby. At $25/hour, the estimated annual labor cost would be $62,500. - Similarly, five new sidewalk machines would need to be purchased at an estimated up front cost of $750,000 ($150k each), or an eight‐year annualized cost of $93,750/year. - Therefore, estimated labor and equipment costs to clear the additional mileage via seasonal/part‐time staff would be $62,500 + $93,750 or $156,250 per year. - It is important to note that if worked over 30 hours on a regular basis, cost for healthcare would need to be added to the wage rate. Additionally, the Local 49er Union Contract has language that limits us in use of equipment by seasonal/part‐ time staff and restrictions on time worked. Discussions would need to occur with the union. What is the cost for service (contractor) to do work? Approximately $1.2M cost to cover the resident‐maintained portion of the system only. The estimate was received directly from a contractor already working within SLP two years ago. Staff reached out to three snow removal contractors already performing work for the city: One responded with the above estimate and two others declined submitting an estimate stating they were not interested in the work. The large upfront investment likely drove the contractor’s costs Special Study Session Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: 2017 Budget Update Page 20 and the immediate availability of the contractor to perform the work with the unpredictability of the snow events. Staff would need to do a request for proposal if an option like this is chosen. This cost will increase in direct relation to the additional segments built via the Connect the Park construction effort. What is the cost for the city to plow all sidewalks assuming this would be done on overtime? Given the fact that when a snow event happens all maintenance staff are involved and typically work 10‐12 hour shifts (including overtime), the current staff would not be able to add the additional hours if the snow must be removed within 2 days. An option would be to add 5 public service workers @ $80k = $400k plus the additional 5 sidewalk machines @ $150k each. The staffing estimate is based on the 60 miles maintained by residents and the average length of our routes are 12 miles. What is the current cost for what we do now for sidewalk snow removal? For our current routes, the cost is approximately $90‐$120K/year (staff and equipment) depending on the year and the frequency/amount of responses requiring work on overtime. Costs for snow removal are only recorded as the time spent actually operating the snow removal equipment and do not include any administrative or overhead costs. How much would we save if we discontinued this for our sidewalks? The cost estimate to do the current sidewalk removal is $90k‐120k/year depending on the season. If we discontinued plowing current sidewalks, the recommendation would be to maintain the current level of staffing to cover other related maintenance activities. Therefore the savings would be in overtime related to sidewalk activities of $2k‐$10k (estimate depending on snowfall amounts for the season). The equipment savings would come from the elimination of three out of the four sidewalk machines (approximately $60K/year in annualized savings). Staff would still anticipate keeping one machine in the fleet inventory. Here are some basic facts about our sidewalk system: Current miles plowed by city staff: 48 miles Number of current routes: 4 Average route length: 48/4 = 12 miles Current miles cleared by residents: 60 miles Other items to consider: What is the problem or opportunity to be addressed? Ability to attract/retain competent and reliable part‐time staff who would be expected to work with an unpredictable schedule. Physical width and condition of certain sidewalks in the community will make snow removal difficult. The city’s approach for removal on a mass basis will not provide for a bare pavement result. Concerns about meeting expectations given the above and other considerations. Special Study Session Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: 2017 Budget Update Page 21 CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARKRESIDENTIAL ESTIMATED CITY SHARE OF PROPERTY TAXES2017 PRELIMINARY PROPERTY TAX LEVY6.50% INCREASEAs of 8-24-16* These are estimated figures at particular price points. Homes at the price points will not experience these exact changes.Val. Taxable Taxable Estimated City Tax Dollar Percent2015 For 2016 For % Market Market 2016 2017 Change ChangePay 2016 Pay 2017 ChangeValue 2016Value 2017175,000 171,300 -2.1%153,510 149,477 709.14 694.25-14.89 -2.1%200,000 199,000 -0.5%180,760 179,670 835.02 834.48-0.54 -0.1%225,000 230,200 2.3%208,010 213,678 960.90 992.4331.53 3.3%227,500 240,100 5.5%210,735 224,469 973.49 1,042.5569.06 7.1%250,000 262,200 4.9%235,260 248,558 1,086.78 1,154.4367.64 6.2%300,000 313,500 4.5%289,760 304,475 1,338.55 1,414.1375.59 5.6%400,000 416,400 4.1%398,760 416,400 1,842.07 1,933.9791.90 5.0%500,000 516,000 3.2%500,000 516,000 2,309.75 2,415.14105.39 4.6%Assumptions:2016 and 2017 tax capacity rate based on Hennepin County information. Tax capacity rates increase from 1% to 1.25% for values over $500,000.= Median Value Home in St. Louis ParkAssessed Market Val.Special Study Session Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: 2017 Budget UpdatePage 22 Financial Management PlanWater Utility Fund - Accounts for all provisions of water services including administration, billing and collection, Reilly, maintenance, operations and capital.Qtrly Fixed Fee Increase (3/4" met2.44$ 2.44$ 2.44$ 2.44$ 2.44$ 2.44$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Percent Usage Fee Increase4%7%7%7%6%6%6%6%5%5%5%5%201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026Actual Revised Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected ProjectedRevenuesLicenses & Permits26,405 5,000 25,000 25,750 26,523 27,318 28,138 28,982 29,851 30,747 31,669 32,619 Charges for Services4,858,914 5,757,419 6,160,438 6,591,669 6,987,169 7,406,399 7,850,783 8,321,830 8,737,922 9,174,818 9,633,559 10,115,237 Water Available Charge (WAC)326,250 209,250 260,000 260,000 260,000 260,000 260,000 260,000 260,000 260,000 260,000 260,000 Special Assessments161,923 - - - - - - - - - - - Rent Revenue357,774 260,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 Interest Income27,392 - 3,408 50,927 28,904 74,232 50,242 16,711 6,439 57,127 47,425 42,847 Miscellaneous/ Other Revenue35,334 - - - - - - - - - - - Bond Proceeds- - 5,000,000 - 5,000,000 - - - 4,000,000 - - - Total Revenues5,803,991$ 6,231,669$ 11,798,846$ 7,278,346$ 12,652,596$ 8,117,950$ 8,539,163$ 8,977,523$ 13,384,212$ 9,872,692$ 10,322,653$ 10,800,703$ ExpendituresPersonal Services1,248,869 1,224,361 1,333,133 1,366,461 1,400,623 1,439,140 1,482,314 1,526,784 1,572,587 1,619,765 1,668,358 1,718,408 Supplies225,581 453,000 524,800 540,544 556,760 573,463 590,667 608,387 626,639 645,438 664,801 684,745 Non-Capital Equipment3,014 20,000 20,000 20,600 21,218 21,855 22,510 23,185 23,881 24,597 25,335 26,095 Services & Other Charges2,181,327 1,045,730 949,377 977,858 1,007,194 1,037,410 1,068,532 1,100,588 1,133,606 1,167,614 1,202,642 1,238,722 Debt Service321,878 1,050,115 1,349,847 1,353,373 1,356,377 1,361,272 927,720 931,943 934,289 691,823 694,859 545,400 2017 Debt Service- - - 625,000 625,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 1,900,000 1,900,000 1,900,000 Capital Outlay(61,893) 1,766,194 3,118,298 2,302,562 3,085,755 2,434,847 3,789,721 2,533,269 2,729,354 2,687,815 2,640,140 2,537,230 Estimated Repl. (Main to Curb box- - - 184,575 161,000 140,000 140,000 140,000 140,000 140,000 140,000 140,000 Other expenses- - 12,000 12,360 12,731 13,113 13,506 13,911 14,329 14,758 15,201 15,657 Transfers Out1,292,652 567,429 584,451 601,985 620,044 638,645 657,805 677,539 697,865 718,801 740,365 762,576 Reilly517,353 687,854 739,021 761,192 784,027 807,548 831,775 856,728 882,430 908,903 936,170 964,255 Total Expenditures5,770,534$ 6,885,183$ 8,630,927$ 8,746,510$ 9,630,730$ 9,717,293$ 10,774,550$ 9,662,334$ 10,004,979$ 10,519,514$ 10,627,871$ 10,533,089$ Incr/(Decr) in Fund Balance33,457$ (653,514)$ 3,167,919$ (1,468,164)$ 3,021,866$ (1,599,344)$ (2,235,388)$ (684,811)$ 3,379,233$ (646,822)$ (305,218)$ 267,614$ Fund Balance - Beginning5,113,056$ 5,146,517$ 4,493,003$ 7,660,922$ 6,192,758$ 9,214,624$ 7,615,280$ 5,379,892$ 4,695,082$ 8,074,315$ 7,427,493$ 7,122,275$ Fund Balance - Ending5,146,517$ 4,493,003$ 7,660,922$ 6,192,758$ 9,214,624$ 7,615,280$ 5,379,892$ 4,695,082$ 8,074,315$ 7,427,493$ 7,122,275$ 7,389,889$ Fund Balance Percentage57.70% 52.06% 87.59% 64.30% 94.83% 70.68% 55.68% 46.93% 76.76% 69.89% 67.62% 99.10%Cash Available at Year End880,701$ 227,187$ 3,395,106$ 1,926,942$ 4,948,808$ 3,349,464$ 1,114,076$ 429,266$ 3,808,499$ 3,161,677$ 2,856,459$ 3,124,073$ Cash Available Percentage9.87% 2.63% 38.82% 20.01% 50.93% 31.09% 11.53% 4.29% 36.20% 29.75% 27.12% 41.90%Target Cash Balance - 35-50%Special Study Session Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: 2017 Budget UpdatePage 23 Capital Improvement Program City of St. Louis Park, MN PROJECTS BY FUNDING SOURCE 2017 2026thru Total20172018201920202021Source20222023202420252026 #Priority Water Utility 20,00010,000 10,000OR / Utilities: SCADA Solution 13135003 3 6,660666666666666666666666666666666Admin Serv / Utilities: Infinity BI Service 13155014 3 51,00051,000Admin Serv: Utility Billing App Replacement 13195001 1 175,33515,666 15,666 15,666 18,333 18,334 18,334 18,334 18,334 18,334 18,334OR: Asset Mgmt Software 13995011 3 10,0005,000 5,000OR: MSC Cameras 13995031 3 2,207,6872,207,687Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 4)40171000 1 404,718404,718Street - Reconstruction (Utica Avenue) 40171001 1 106,4786,776 99,702Street - MSA Street Rehab (Louisiana Ave) 40171100 1 88,78588,785Street - MSA Street Rehab (Texas S of Mtka) 40171101 1 50,00050,000Bridge - W 37th St @ Minnehaha Creek 40171700 1 275,000275,000Water- Rehab WTP 16 Reservior 40175000 1 1,923,7851,923,785Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 6)40181000 1 75,03975,039Street - Commercial Street Rehab 40181050 1 35,26835,268Street - MSA Street Rehab (Aquila)40181100 1 1,640,5841,640,584Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 7)40191000 1 72,07772,077Street - Commercial Street Rehab 40191050 1 137,015137,015Street - MSA Street Rehab (CLR E of Lou) 40191100 1 20,77620,776Street - MSA Street Rehab (Ottawa)40191101 1 101,971101,971Street - MSA Street Rehab (Beltline Blvd) 40191102 1 935,000935,000Water - Recoat Reservoir 2 @ WTP #6 40195000 1 2,126,5932,126,593Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 8)40201000 1 Saturday, August 27, 2016Page 12017-2026 Draft Capital Improvement Plan Special Study Session Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: 2017 Budget Update Page 24 Total20172018201920202021Source20222023202420252026 #Priority 81,95181,951Street - Commercial Street Rehab 40201050 1 155,304155,304Street - MSA Street Rehab (Texas Ave N of Mtka) 40201100 3 1,852,0701,852,070Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 1)40211000 1 79,97679,976Street - Commercial Street Rehab 40211050 1 149,675149,675Street - MSA Street Rehab (CLR W of Lou) 40211100 1 1,540,0001,540,000Water- Recoat Elevated Water Tower #2 40215000 1 2,310,0002,310,000Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 2)40221000 1 64,17864,178Street - Commercial Street Rehab 40221050 1 105,091105,091Street - MSA Street Rehab (Shelard Pkwy) 40221100 1 2,354,0002,354,000Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 3)40231000 1 89,85089,850Street - Commercial Street Rehab 40231050 1 143,504143,504Street - MSA Street Rehab (Oxford/Edgwd/Cambridge) 40231100 1 2,409,0002,409,000Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 4)40241000 1 96,76296,762Street - Commercial Street Rehab 40241050 1 122,053122,053Street - MSA Street Rehab (W28th St) 40241100 1 2,420,0002,420,000Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 5)40251000 1 67,14067,140Street - Commercial Street Rehab 40251050 1 2,420,0002,420,000Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 6)40261000 1 60,23060,230Street - Commercial Street Rehab 40261050 1 35,00035,000Reilly Site - Install Monitor Well (W413) 53175000 5 34,00034,000Water Well Rehab (SLP14)53175003 1 71,00071,000Water Treatment Plant GAC Replacement (WTP1) 53185001 1 35,00035,000Water Well Rehab (SLP6)53185002 1 35,00035,000Water Well Rehab (SLP4)53195001 1 71,00071,000Water Treatment Plant GAC Replacement (WTP4) 53195002 1 52,00052,000Water Well Rehab (SLP11)53205002 1 74,00074,000Water Treatment Plant GAC Replacement (WTP4) 53215001 1 75,00075,000Water Treatment Plant GAC Replacement (WTP1) 53215002 1 35,00035,000Water Well Rehab (SLP15)53225001 1 Saturday, August 27, 2016Page 22017-2026 Draft Capital Improvement Plan Special Study Session Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: 2017 Budget Update Page 25 Total20172018201920202021Source20222023202420252026 #Priority 77,00077,000Water Treatment Plant GAC Replacement (WTP4) 53235001 1 36,00036,000Water Well Rehab (SLP8)53235002 1 36,00036,000Water Well Rehab (SLP16)53245001 1 54,00054,000Water Well Rehab (SLP12)53255001 1 80,00080,000Water Treatment Plant GAC Replacement (WTP4) 53255002 1 38,00038,000Water Well Rehab (SLP10)53265001 1 36,43636,436Annual Equipment Replacement Program E - XX01 1 Water Utility Total 27,858,9913,118,298 2,302,562 3,085,755 2,434,847 3,789,721 2,533,269 2,729,354 2,687,815 2,640,140 2,537,230 3,118,298 2,302,562 3,085,755 2,434,847 3,789,721 27,858,991GRAND TOTAL 2,533,269 2,729,354 2,687,815 2,640,140 2,537,230 Report criteria: Active Projects All Address data All Categories All Departments All Contacts All From Street data All Priority Levels All Projects All Street Name data All To Street data Saturday, August 27, 2016Page 32017-2026 Draft Capital Improvement Plan Special Study Session Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: 2017 Budget Update Page 26 Financial Management PlanSewer Utility Fund - This fund is to be used for all provisions of sewer services including administration, billing and collection, maintenance, operations and capital.Percentage Rate Increase4.5%8%7%7%6%4%3%3%2%2%2%2%201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026Actual Revised Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected ProjectedRevenuesIntergovernmental1,018 - - - - - - - - - - Charges for Services5,990,801 6,404,588 6,915,804 7,399,910 7,843,905 8,157,661 8,402,391 8,654,463 8,827,552 9,004,103 9,184,185 9,367,869 Special Assessments73,518 30,000 30,000 30,900 31,827 32,782 33,765 34,778 35,822 36,896 38,003 39,143 Interest Income5,283 10,000 (5,244) 19,135 18,727 20,452 26,069 32,548 39,847 46,152 51,967 66,645 Miscellaneous/ Other Revenue46,688 - - - - - - - - - - Bond Proceeds- 1,750,000 Transfers InTotal Revenues6,117,307$ 6,444,588$ 8,690,560$ 7,449,945$ 7,894,459$ 8,210,895$ 8,462,225$ 8,721,789$ 8,903,221$ 9,087,151$ 9,274,155$ 9,473,657$ ExpendituresPersonal Services562,700 571,540 618,546 634,010 649,860 667,731 687,763 708,396 729,648 751,537 774,083 797,306 Supplies15,216 25,050 25,550 26,317 27,106 27,919 28,757 29,619 30,508 31,423 32,366 33,337 Non-Capital Equipment1,736 39,500 39,500 40,685 41,906 43,163 44,458 45,791 47,165 48,580 50,037 51,539 Services & Other Charges671,562 481,807 499,451 514,435 529,868 545,764 562,137 579,001 596,371 614,262 632,690 651,670 Debt Service5,645 21,914 22,016 22,084 22,118 22,093 22,031 21,929 22,279 - - - 2017 debt service- - - 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 Disposal Charges3,693,817 4,177,164 4,263,610 4,391,518 4,523,264 4,658,962 4,798,731 4,942,693 5,090,973 5,243,703 5,401,014 5,563,044 Capital Outlay- 1,954,786 785,983 813,119 925,333 785,001 774,001 768,001 798,001 813,001 178,501 178,501 Other Expenses- - 11,000 11,330 11,670 12,020 12,381 12,752 13,135 13,529 13,934 14,353 Transfers Out1,344,488 776,357 799,648 823,637 848,346 873,797 900,011 927,011 954,821 983,466 1,012,970 1,043,359 Total Expenditures6,295,163$ 8,048,118$ 7,065,303$ 7,477,134$ 7,779,470$ 7,836,449$ 8,030,267$ 8,235,192$ 8,482,900$ 8,699,500$ 8,295,595$ 8,533,108$ Incr/(Decr) in Fund Balance(177,855)$ (1,603,530)$ 1,625,257$ (27,189)$ 114,989$ 374,446$ 431,958$ 486,597$ 420,320$ 387,651$ 978,560$ 940,549$ Fund Balance - Beginning6,705,575$ 6,527,721$ 4,924,191$ 6,549,448$ 6,522,259$ 6,637,248$ 7,011,694$ 7,443,652$ 7,930,249$ 8,350,569$ 8,738,220$ 9,716,780$ Fund Balance - Ending6,527,721$ 4,924,191$ 6,549,448$ 6,522,259$ 6,637,248$ 7,011,694$ 7,443,652$ 7,930,249$ 8,350,569$ 8,738,220$ 9,716,780$ 10,657,329$ Fund Balance Percentage87.34% 69.70% 87.59% 83.84% 84.70% 87.32% 90.39% 93.49% 95.99% 105.34% 113.87% 141.91%Cash Available at Year End1,253,942$ (349,587)$ 1,275,670$ 1,248,481$ 1,363,470$ 1,737,916$ 2,169,873$ 2,656,470$ 3,076,791$ 3,464,441$ 4,443,001$ 5,383,550$ Cash Available Percentage16.78% -4.95% 17.06% 16.05% 17.40% 21.64% 26.35% 31.32% 35.37% 41.76% 52.07% 71.69%Target Cash Balance - 35-50%Special Study Session Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: 2017 Budget UpdatePage 27 Capital Improvement ProgramCity of St. Louis Park, MNPROJECTS BY FUNDING SOURCE2017 2026thruTotal2017 2018 2019 2020 2021Source2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 # PrioritySanitary Sewer Utility6,670667 667 667 667 667 667 667 667 667667Admin Serv / Utilities: Infinity BI Service13155014351,00051,000Admin Serv: Utility Billing App Replacement131950011175,33615,666 15,666 15,666 18,334 18,334 18,334 18,334 18,334 18,33418,334OR: Asset Mgmt Software13995011315,00010,0005,000OR: MSC Cameras139950313132,000132,000Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 4)40171000149,5003,150 46,350Street - MSA Street Rehab (Louisiana Ave)40171100149,50049,500Street - MSA Street Rehab (Texas S of Mtka)401711011100,000100,000Bridge - W 37th St @ Minnehaha Creek401717001440,000440,000Sanitary Sewer- Mainline Rehab (Area 6)401730001132,000132,000Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 6)40181000127,50027,500Street - Commercial Street Rehab40181050149,50049,500Street - MSA Street Rehab (Aquila)401811001460,000460,000Sanitary Sewer- Mainline Rehab (Area 7)401830001132,000132,000Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 7)40191000127,50027,500Street - Commercial Street Rehab40191050149,50049,500Street - MSA Street Rehab (CLR E of Lou)40191100149,50049,500Street - MSA Street Rehab (Ottawa)40191101149,50049,500Street - MSA Street Rehab (Beltline Blvd)401911021480,000480,000Sanitary Sewer- Mainline Rehab (Area 8)401930001132,000132,000Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 8)402010001Saturday, August 27, 2016Page 12017-2026 Draft Capital Improvement PlanSpecial Study Session Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: 2017 Budget UpdatePage 28 Total2017 2018 2019 2020 2021Source2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 # Priority27,50027,500Street - Commercial Street Rehab40201050149,50049,500Street - MSA Street Rehab (Texas Ave N of Mtka)402011003510,000510,000Sanitary Sewer- Mainline Rehab (Area 1)402030001132,000132,000Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 1)40211000127,50027,500Street - Commercial Street Rehab40211050149,50049,500Street - MSA Street Rehab (CLR W of Lou)402111001520,000520,000Sanitary Sewer- Mainline Rehab (Area 2)402130001132,000132,000Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 2)40221000127,50027,500Street - Commercial Street Rehab40221050149,50049,500Street - MSA Street Rehab (Shelard Pkwy)402211001540,000540,000Sanitary Sewer- Mainline Rehab (Area 3)402230001132,000132,000Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 3)40231000127,50027,500Street - Commercial Street Rehab40231050149,50049,500Street - MSA Street Rehab (Oxford/Edgwd/Cambridge)402311001570,000570,000Sanitary Sewer- Mainline Rehab (Area 4)402330001132,000132,000Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 4)40241000127,50027,500Street - Commercial Street Rehab40241050149,50049,500Street - MSA Street Rehab (W28th St)402411001580,000580,000Sanitary Sewer- Mainline Rehab (Area 5)402430001132,000132,000Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 5)40251000127,50027,500Street - Commercial Street Rehab402510501132,000132,000Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 6)40261000127,50027,500Street - Commercial Street Rehab40261050130,00030,000Sanitary Sewer LS Maint (LS #13)53175101115,00015,000Sanitary Sewer LS Maint (LS #23)53175102145,00045,000Sanitary Sewer LS Maint (LS #9)53185101145,00045,000Sanitary Sewer LS Maint (LS #21)53195101115,00015,000Sanitary Sewer LS Maint (LS #4)53195102147,00047,000Sanitary Sewer LS Maint (LS #22)53205101126,00026,000Sanitary Sewer LS Maint (LS #15)532151011Saturday, August 27, 2016Page 22017-2026 Draft Capital Improvement PlanSpecial Study Session Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: 2017 Budget UpdatePage 29 Total2017 2018 2019 2020 2021Source2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 # Priority36,43636,436Annual Equipment Replacement ProgramE - XX011Sanitary Sewer Utility Total6,819,442785,983 813,119 925,333 785,001 774,001 768,001 798,001 813,001 178,501 178,501785,983 813,119 925,333 785,001 774,0016,819,442GRAND TOTAL768,001 798,001 813,001 178,501 178,501Report criteria:All Address data All CategoriesAll ContactsAll From Street data All DepartmentsAll Priority LevelsAll ProjectsAll Street Name data All To Street data Source Type: Sanitary Sewer UtilitySaturday, August 27, 2016Page 32017-2026 Draft Capital Improvement PlanSpecial Study Session Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: 2017 Budget UpdatePage 30 Financial Management PlanStorm Water Utility Fund - This fund is to be used for all provisions of storm water including administration, billing and collection, maintenance, operations and capital.Percentage Rate Increase10%10%2.5%2.5%2.5%1%1%1%0%0%0%0%Rate- residential qtrly19.36$ 21.30$ 21.83$ 22.37$ 22.93$ 23.16$ 23.39$ 23.63$ 23.63$ 23.63$ 23.63$ 23.63$ 201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026Actual Revised Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected ProjectedRevenuesCharges for Services2,469,057 2,717,638 2,785,579 2,855,218 2,926,599 2,955,865 2,985,424 3,015,278 3,015,278 3,015,278 3,015,278 3,015,278 Interest Income16,054 24,000 34,994 16,691 16,742 24,307 28,497 37,717 40,807 42,587 45,219 54,593 Miscellaneous/ Other Revenue3,078 - - - - - - - - - - Bond Proceeds- - Total Revenues2,488,190$ 2,741,638$ 2,820,573$ 2,871,909$ 2,943,341$ 2,980,172$ 3,013,921$ 3,052,995$ 3,056,085$ 3,057,865$ 3,060,497$ 3,069,871$ ExpendituresPersonal Services511,933 689,746 713,610 731,450 749,737 770,354 793,465 817,269 841,787 867,041 893,052 919,843 Supplies1,775 27,100 27,800 28,634 29,493 30,378 31,289 32,228 33,195 34,190 35,216 36,273 Non-Capital Equipment1,599 3,000 3,000 3,090 3,183 3,278 3,377 3,478 3,582 3,690 3,800 3,914 Services & Other Charges794,130 600,664 597,828 615,763 634,236 653,263 672,861 693,047 713,838 735,253 757,311 780,030 Debt Service46,627 383,044 182,804 183,397 183,897 184,777 96,878 97,620 98,384 - - - Other Expenses11,000 11,330 11,670 12,020 12,381 12,752 13,135 13,529 13,934 14,353 Capital Outlay- 1,050,212 2,191,667 972,353 494,667 704,667 436,667 827,667 859,667 843,667 335,667 220,667 Transfers Out841,524 303,949 313,067 322,459 332,133 342,097 352,360 362,930 373,818 385,033 396,584 408,481 Total Expenditures2,197,588$ 3,057,715$ 4,040,776$ 2,868,476$ 2,439,014$ 2,700,833$ 2,399,277$ 2,846,990$ 2,937,406$ 2,882,402$ 2,435,564$ 2,383,561$ Incr/(Decr) in Fund Balance290,602$ (316,077)$ (1,220,203)$ 3,433$ 504,327$ 279,339$ 614,644$ 206,004$ 118,679$ 175,463$ 624,933$ 686,310$ Fund Balance - Beginning14,777,186$ 15,067,791$ 14,751,713$ 13,531,510$ 13,534,943$ 14,039,270$ 14,318,609$ 14,933,253$ 15,139,257$ 15,257,937$ 15,433,399$ 16,058,332$ Fund Balance - Ending15,067,791$ 14,751,713$ 13,531,510$ 13,534,943$ 14,039,270$ 14,318,609$ 14,933,253$ 15,139,257$ 15,257,937$ 15,433,399$ 16,058,332$ 16,744,642$ Fund Balance Percentage331.85% 365.07% 471.73% 554.93% 519.81% 596.79% 524.53% 515.40% 529.35% 633.67% 673.71% 679.85%Cash Available at Year End2,649,006$ 2,332,929$ 1,112,725$ 1,116,158$ 1,620,485$ 1,899,824$ 2,514,468$ 2,720,473$ 2,839,152$ 3,014,615$ 3,639,548$ 4,325,857$ Cash Available Percentage58.34% 57.73% 38.79% 45.76% 60.00% 79.18% 88.32% 92.61% 98.50% 123.77% 152.69% 175.63%Target Cash Balance - 25-40%Special Study Session Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: 2017 Budget UpdatePage 31 Capital Improvement Program City of St. Louis Park, MN PROJECTS BY FUNDING SOURCE 2017 2026thru Total20172018201920202021Source20222023202420252026 #Priority Stormwater Utility 6,670667667667667667667667667667667Admin Serv / Utilities: Infinity BI Service 13155014 3 51,00051,000Admin Serv: Utility Billing App Replacement 13195001 1 15,0005,000 10,000OR: MSC Cameras 13995031 3 1,696,2501,505,000 191,250Storm Water- Bass Lake Preserve Rehab 40144000 1 55,00055,000Concrete Replacement- SW-C&G- CB 40170003 1 165,000165,000Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 4)40171000 1 350,000350,000Storm Water- Walker Pond Expansion 40174000 1 55,00055,000Concrete Replacement- SW-C&G- CB 40180003 1 165,000165,000Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 6)40181000 1 55,00055,000Street - Commercial Street Rehab 40181050 1 300,000300,000Storm Water- Oregon Pond Basin Rehab 40184000 1 150,00050,000 100,000Storm Water- Local SW Mgmt Plan 40184100 1 55,00055,000Concrete Replacement- SW-C&G- CB 40190003 1 165,000165,000Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 7)40191000 1 55,00055,000Street - Commercial Street Rehab 40191050 1 90,00090,000Storm Water- Sumter Pond Rehab 40194000 1 55,00055,000Concrete Replacement- SW-C&G- CB 40200003 1 165,000165,000Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 8)40201000 1 55,00055,000Street - Commercial Street Rehab 40201050 1 109,000109,000Storm Water- Lamplighter Pond Rehab 40204000 1 Saturday, August 27, 2016Page 12017-2026 Draft Capital Improvement Plan Special Study Session Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: 2017 Budget Update Page 32 Total20172018201920202021Source20222023202420252026 #Priority 270,000270,000Storm Water- Browndale Pond Rehab 40204001 1 55,00055,000Concrete Replacement- SW-C&G- CB 40210003 1 165,000165,000Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 1)40211000 1 55,00055,000Street - Commercial Street Rehab 40211050 1 109,000109,000Storm Water- Otten Pond Rehab 40214001 1 55,00055,000Concrete Replacement- SW-C&G- CB 40220003 1 165,000165,000Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 2)40221000 1 55,00055,000Street - Commercial Street Rehab 40221050 1 250,000250,000Bridge - 34th Street @ Minnehaha Creek 40221700 1 248,000248,000Storm Water- Westdale Sed Basin Rehab 40224000 1 55,00055,000Concrete Replacement- SW-C&G- CB 40230003 1 165,000165,000Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 3)40231000 1 55,00055,000Street - Commercial Street Rehab 40231050 1 528,000528,000Storm Water- Cedar Manor Lake Rehab 40234000 1 55,00055,000Concrete Replacement- SW-C&G- CB 40240003 1 165,000165,000Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 4)40241000 1 55,00055,000Street - Commercial Street Rehab 40241050 1 500,000500,000Storm Water- Louisiana Oaks Pond Rehab 40244000 1 55,00055,000Concrete Replacement- SW-C&G- CB 40250003 1 165,000165,000Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 5)40251000 1 55,00055,000Street - Commercial Street Rehab 40251050 1 165,000165,000Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 6)40261000 1 55,00055,000Street - Commercial Street Rehab 40261050 1 22,00022,000Storm Sewer LS Maint (LS #7)53175301 1 44,00044,000Annual Catch Basin Repairs (2017)53175302 1 23,00023,000Storm Sewer LS Maint (LS #8)53185301 1 46,00046,000Annual Catch Basin Repairs (2018)53185302 1 25,00025,000Storm Sewer LS Impr (Add SCADA to Stns 1/5/7/8/9) 53195301 3 48,00048,000Annual Catch Basin Repairs (2019)53195302 1 50,00050,000Annual Catch Basin Repairs (2020)53205301 1 Saturday, August 27, 2016Page 22017-2026 Draft Capital Improvement Plan Special Study Session Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: 2017 Budget Update Page 33 Total20172018201920202021Source20222023202420252026 #Priority 52,00052,000Annual Catch Basin Repairs (2021)53215301 1 54,00054,000Annual Catch Basin Repairs (2022)53225301 1 56,00056,000Annual Catch Basin Repairs (2023)53235301 1 58,00058,000Annual Catch Basin Repairs (2024)53245301 1 60,00060,000Annual Catch Basin Repairs (2025)53255301 1 36,43636,436Annual Equipment Replacement Program E - XX01 1 Stormwater Utility Total 7,887,3562,191,667 972,353 494,667 704,667 436,667 827,667 859,667 843,667 335,667 220,667 2,191,667 972,353 494,667 704,667 436,667 7,887,356GRAND TOTAL 827,667 859,667 843,667 335,667 220,667 Report criteria: Active Projects All Address data All Categories All Departments All Contacts All From Street data All Priority Levels All Projects All Street Name data All To Street data Saturday, August 27, 2016Page 32017-2026 Draft Capital Improvement Plan Special Study Session Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: 2017 Budget Update Page 34 Meeting: Special Study Session Meeting Date: September 6, 2016 Discussion Item: 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Multi-Family Development Rental/Condo Market and 2016 Semi-Annual Housing Programs Activity Report RECOMMENDED ACTION: No formal action requested. A presentation will be given on the multi-family development rental and condo markets providing a review of historical and current trends and the outlook for the Twin Cities metro area as a whole and the City of St. Louis Park specifically. The 2016 Semi-Annual Housing Programs Activity Report provides an update to council on housing programs and activity administered in St. Louis Park through June 30, 2016. POLICY CONSIDERATION: None at this time. The information provided in the presentation and housing report will inform the Council as they consider future development in the City. SUMMARY: Brent Wittenberg, CRE, Vice President at Marquette Advisors, will provide a presentation on the apartment and condo markets providing a review of historical and current trends, and the outlook for the Twin Cities metro area as a whole, and the City of St. Louis Park specifically. Marquette specializes in development feasibility analysis spanning all property types serving both private and public sector clients. Mr. Wittenberg was the primary author of the SWLRT Housing Gaps Analysis prepared on behalf of the Southwest Corridor Community Works. The Semi-Annual Housing Programs Activity Report including the Housing Matrix has been presented to Council since 2005. The attached report provides data on housing activity through June 30, 2016. The Executive Summary provides a quick review of the detailed report and the report provides historical trends, program descriptions, affordable housing and additional information on housing programs administered in St. Louis Park. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a well-maintained and diverse housing stock. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: 2016 Semi-Annual Housing Activity Programs Report Prepared by: Marney Olson, Assistant Housing Supervisor Reviewed by: Michele Schnitker, Housing Supervisor/CD Deputy Director Approved by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director 2016 Semi-Annual Housing Programs Activity Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this report is to apprise city policy makers of housing program activity during the first half of 2016. The report provides historical trends, program descriptions, and additional information. Below are the key points with details following this summary. 1. Remodeling Activity a. Housing rehab projects (general remodeling) are strong in the first half of 2016. Most projects were financed without using city loans. b. The city’s Architect Design Services and Remodeling Advisor Services continue to be great tools for residents and is on pace with 2015. c. 114 home energy visits were conducted through the Home Energy Squad (HES) program, the most in any six month period since the program started. This is the 4th highest usage of the participating HES cities behind Minneapolis, Bloomington, and Brooklyn Park. d. Major remodeling projects and home additions are slightly behind 2015; however, 2015 was at an eleven year high in major remodeling permits. e. Discount Loan use in 2016 is similar to 2014 and 2015. This is consistent with other communities that CEE works with. Many residents are taking advantage of the energy loan for furnaces, windows and insulation that does not have an income limit or the 5.99% no income limit loan for general home improvements. f. The Construction Management Plan program has been in place since November 2014. In the first half of 2016 the following neighborhood notification letters were sent for Construction Management (CMP) plan projects: 19 major additions, 6 demo/rebuilds, 1 new construction for the single family site at Eliot School. A map is included in the report showing the location of these projects. 2. Affordable Home Ownership and Public Housing Update a. Effective in 2016 Citizens Independent Bank is offering $500 to qualified borrowers eligible for the Live Where You Work. b. The SLP Housing Authority affordable rental housing and rental assistance programs continue to have high occupancy and long waiting lists. The three bedroom waiting list opened in June and the four bedroom in August. Approximately 500 households received rental assistance in the first half of 2016. c. The SLP Housing Authority has continued administering the new Stable HOME rental assistance program for Suburban Hennepin County which provides housing assistance to homeless or previously homeless individuals and families in Suburban Hennepin County. 20 households were served in the first half of 2016. 3. Housing Matrix a. Owner occupied (homestead) properties now comprise 53% of the housing market with rental (non-homestead) at 47%. This is consistent with 2015 and the single family home ownership rate continues to be high at 90%. b. NEW: The Housing Development Project List is included in the report showing residential projects since 2006 including projects under construction. 4. Foreclosures a. The foreclosure rate is extremely low with only 18 residential foreclosures in the first half of 2016. Special Study Session Meeting of September 6 (Item No. 2) Title: Multi-Family Development Rental/Condo Mkt & 2016 Semi-Annual Housing Prgs Activity Report Page 2 1. REMODELING ACTIVITY Residential permitted activity measures remodeling and maintenance activity; this section shows historical trends of remodeling activity. Permit Trends “Alteration Residential” or General Remodeling The chart below shows the trend line of general remodeling activity over time. This work includes projects with permit valuations less than $37,500 (the average value per job in the first half of 2016 is approximately $8,600) and includes such items as: o remodeling of bathrooms and kitchens; o finishing of basement and attic spaces; o conversion of existing spaces; o window and door replacements, insulation; and o drain tile, step, and foundation work. The trend line below reflects residents’ willingness to preserve and update housing, the impact of the city’s proactive housing improvement assistance, and the ongoing needs of older housing stock. Chart 1: Trend of Maintenance & Minor Remodeling Permits Since 2005 Roofing and Siding Activity Reroofing and residing permits are tracked separately. This chart illustrates the impact of storm damage in 2008-9 and again in 2011. Almost 60% of the homes in the city had roofs replaced between 2008 and 2011. It is likely the number of reroofs will remain relatively low for the next decade or so. 41 houses were resided and 52 roof replacements were permitted in the first half of 2016. 517 785 797 971 869 1129 1011 1091 1084 1074 639 0 500 1000 1500 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 1st half 2016Number of Permits IssuedYear Maintenance & Minor Remodeling Permits Alteration Residential (Minor) Special Study Session Meeting of September 6 (Item No. 2) Title: Multi-Family Development Rental/Condo Mkt & 2016 Semi-Annual Housing Prgs Activity Report Page 3 Chart 2: Reroofing and Residing Permits Since 2005 *Spike in reroofing due to 2008 storms. Additions and Major Remodeling The number of major remodeling permits (valued at more than $37,500) and additions continues to be strong in the first half of 2016 and are on pace with the first six months of 2015. The increase in additions beginning in 2012 shows that homeowners are once again willing to make significant investments into their homes. The average permit valuation for additions during the first half of 2016 is $108,360 and the average for major remodels is $62,185. There were 27 major remodels and 30 additions during 2015. Chart 3: Number of Addition and Major Remodeling Permits Since 2005 Permit Valuation The valuation for single family remodeling activity in the first half of 2016 was relatively consistent with previous years. The following chart shows historical remodeling permit valuation for additions, major remodels, remodeling and maintenance, garages/decks, reroofs, and siding. Additional permits with additional valuations were issued for plumbing, heating, 216 355 845 201 761 140 161 131 104 52 85 66 84 573 332 117 117 73 83 70 470 500 1000 1500 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 1st half 2016Number of Permits IssuedYear Reroofing and Residing Permits Reroof Reside 86 102 89 55 40 48 71 67 67 70 3050 50 46 50 53 46 44 53 53 70 27 0 40 80 120 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 1st half 2016Number of Permits IssuedYear Addition and Major Remodel Permit Activity Addition Residential Major Remodels *4828 Special Study Session Meeting of September 6 (Item No. 2) Title: Multi-Family Development Rental/Condo Mkt & 2016 Semi-Annual Housing Prgs Activity Report Page 4 and electrical work (not shown here). As the chart illustrates, permit valuation varies significantly from year to year; however, with the exception of the “year of the hail damage repairs” (2008), valuation has ranged between $14 and $27 million. The valuation of permits in the first half of 2016 was $12 million with over 800 permits pulled. Chart 4: Permitted Residential Remodeling Since 2005 City Housing Improvement Services, Loans Trends and Program Descriptions Home Improvement Services. The city’s architectural design service and remodeling continue to be great programs for residents. The numbers of visits are on pace with last year and the feedback we’ve received from residents indicates it is a valuable service. The home energy visits (Home Energy Squad Enhanced) are on pace to be the highest since we started the program in 2012. There were 36 remodeling advisor visits and 13 architectural design consultations during the first half of 2016. Chart 5: Technical, Design and Home Energy Visits $13.9 $15.2 $22.5 $68.5$26.6 $17 $26 $16.8 $21 $25 12.00 20 40 60 80 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 1st half 2016Permit Valuation ‐Million $Year Residential Remodeling Permit Valuation 102 62 48 32 30 29 29 37 41 22 13 157 179 130 126 89 82 69 69 95 69 36 122 153 173 125 114 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 1st half 2016Number of VisitsYear Technical Home Improvement Services Architect Services Remodeling Advisor Home Energy Visits Special Study Session Meeting of September 6 (Item No. 2) Title: Multi-Family Development Rental/Condo Mkt & 2016 Semi-Annual Housing Prgs Activity Report Page 5 Construction Management Plan Major additions (second story additions or additions of 500 square feet or more), demolitions and new construction need to comply with a Construction Management Plan (CMP). In the first half of 2016 the following neighborhood notifications were sent: 19 major additions, 6 demo/rebuilds, 1 new construction (on a parcel that did not previously have a home). Map 1: Special Study Session Meeting of September 6 (Item No. 2) Title: Multi-Family Development Rental/Condo Mkt & 2016 Semi-Annual Housing Prgs Activity Report Page 6 Home Remodeling Fair and Tour Trend Both the Home Remodeling Fair and Tour continue to be popular events with residents. 325- 460 residents visited each of the six tour homes in May and the attendance at the Annual Remodeling Fair in February was approximately 800. City Loan and Rebate Trends The following chart shows the number of Move Up Loans, Discount Loans and Energy Rebates issued in recent years. The number of Discount Loans, 8, is relatively low; however, CEE notes that discount home improvement loan use is slow in their service area and there are other loan options that do not have an income limit. Four Move Up loans is an increased pace over the previous four years. The energy rebate program has slowed down over the past few years but residents continue to say how much they appreciate this program. Chart 6: Use of City Financial Incentives Summary of Move-Up Activity Loan and Service Costs The ratio of public to private investment in the first half of 2016 was 1:4.3 – for every dollar the city invested, residents invested roughly four dollars and thirty cents. The city invested approximately $140,300 in 2016 which leveraged $621,200 worth of private investments. Move-Up in the Park loans are deferred until the sale of the home or forgiven after thirty years. The following loans have been paid off during the last few years: 2012, three loans were paid off in the amount of $59,360 2013, three loans paid off in the amount of $52,249 2014, two loans paid off in the amount of $23,957 2015, four loans paid off in the amount of $78,246 First half 2016, no Move-Up loans have been paid off in the first half of 2016. 28 20 17 17 8 10 6 66 7 4 88 50 55 52 64 22 26 22 17 13 8 22 42 83 73 113 166 143 53 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 1st half 2016Number Loans ‐RebatesYear Loans and Rebates Move up loans Discount loans Energy Rebates Special Study Session Meeting of September 6 (Item No. 2) Title: Multi-Family Development Rental/Condo Mkt & 2016 Semi-Annual Housing Prgs Activity Report Page 7 Table 1: Move-Up Participation and Costs Since 2005 Move-Up Participation and City Costs YEAR Move-Up Loans Discount Loans Architectural Design Services Remodeling Advisor Services Remodeling Tour & Fair Green Rebates Home Energy Squad Enhanced Visits Total City Cost 2005 7 $182,806 76 $45,636 68 $15,300 221 $28,730 $272,472 2006 27 $591,264 88 $186,205 102 $22,950 157 $20,410 1 $5,000 $825,829 2007 27 $620,000 50 $74,000 62 $12,400 179 $23,270 1 $5,000 $734,670 2008 18 $330,937 55 $114,129 49 $11,025 130 $16,900 1 $5,000 $477,991 2009 17 $329,650 52 $106,000 12 $7,200 126 $16,380 1 $5,000 22 $4,092 $468,322 2010 9 $209,769 64 $86,263 30 $6,750 89 $11,510 1 $5,000 42 $7,820 $327,112 2011 10 $226,877 22 $29,213 29 $6,525 82 $10,250 1 $5,000 83 $15,465 $293,330 2012* 6 $106,232 26 $31,276 29 $6,525 69 $8,970 1 $5,505 73 $13,748 122 $7,320 $179,576 2013 6 $145,071 22 $33,063 37 $8,325 69 $8,970 1 $8,271 113 $26,000 153 $10,650 $240,350 2014 6 $138,740 17 $26,079 41 $9,225 95 $12,350 1 $12,350 166 $37,575 173 $11390 $243,573 2015 7 $173,000 13 $17,577 22 $4,950 69 $15,525 1 $10,084 143 $37,610 125 $6,250 $264,996 1st half 2016 4 $84,808 8 $17,609 13 $2,925 36 $8,100 1 $7,585 53 $13,621 114 $5,670 $140,318 *The Remodeling Advisor fee paid by the city increased from $130 to $225 in 2015. This fee had not increased since the program started. The fee is for a two hour in home consultation. Special Study Session Meeting of September 6 (Item No. 2) Title: Multi-Family Development Rental/Condo Mkt & 2016 Semi-Annual Housing Prgs Activity ReportPage 8 2. AFFORDABLE HOME OWNERSHIP, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS AND PUBLIC HOUSING UPDATE Live Where You Work The Live Where You Work Homebuyer Assistance Program began in spring 2009. The goal is to promote home ownership within the city among employees of St. Louis Park businesses. The city provides a deferred loan of $2,500 to an eligible employee and an additional $1,000 is provided to employees purchasing vacant lender-owned foreclosed properties. Employers are invited to contribute a matching or lesser amount to the city’s contribution. The deferred loan will be forgiven after 3 years if the employee continues to work for the employer and meets other qualification requirements. The city contracts with CEE for loan administration. The program has not been used in the first half of 2016. Total participation to date is 21. In 2016 Citizens Independent Bank met with city staff and now offer qualified borrowers $500 off the origination fee. Housing Improvement Area (HIA) The HIA is a finance tool to assist with the preservation of the city’s existing townhome and condominium housing stock. An HIA is a defined area within a city where housing improvements are made and the cost of the improvements are paid in whole or in part from fees imposed on the properties within the area. The Association borrows low interest money from the city, improvements are completed and unit owners repay the loan through fees imposed on their properties and collected with property tax payments. To date, seven HIA’s have been established and over twelve million dollars of improvements has been made to 1100 units. There are no HIA’s currently in process. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Activity completed in the first half of 2016 was funded with FY2015 CDBG funds. $179,231 funded the following projects: the single family low-income homeowner’s emergency repair and loan programs, Homes Within Reach home acquisition/rehab/sale, Perspectives for patio door and deck replacement and repair at Louisiana Court, bathroom rehabs at Wayside Supportive Housing and Park & Rec Summer Youth Programming. West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust, aka Homes Within Reach (HWR). Homes Within Reach is a program of West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust that purchases properties, rehabilitates and then sells the home to qualified low to moderate income households. Buyers pay for the cost of the home only and lease the land for 99 years. City funds are leveraged with CDBG, Hennepin County Affordable Housing Incentive Fund (AHIF), HOME Partnership, Metropolitan Council, Minnesota Housing and other funds. Homes Within Reach creates and preserves affordable homeownership opportunities for working households in the western suburbs of Hennepin County by using the Community Land Trust practice, which takes the cost of the land out of the real estate transaction, making the home more affordable. This means that families can more easily purchase a home where they work or live, retain it for generations, and not over burden their incomes in becoming homeowners. As a result, both the families and communities can rely on affordable homeownership option, which expands homeownership, sustains community resources, supports residential stability, preserves affordability housing and supports a stronger local workforce. One home was purchased in the first half of 2016. Since the program began in 2007 fourteen homes have been purchased and sold to low to moderate income families. Special Study Session Meeting of September 6 (Item No. 2) Title: Multi-Family Development Rental/Condo Mkt & 2016 Semi-Annual Housing Prgs Activity Report Page 9 Twin Cities Habitat for Humanity The city has partnered with Habitat over the years to acquire nine blighted properties for rehab or tear-down for new construction. The city last assisted Habitat with the purchase of one property in 2011, construction was completed in the fall 2012 and the home was sold to a low income family. 3. HOUSING MATRIX The housing matrix shows at a glance the numbers and percentages of housing types, tenure (owner or non-homesteaded), affordable units, senior designated units and large single family homes. The matrix is a guide to evaluate future housing development proposals. The percentage of owner occupied (homesteaded) units is consistent with the last several years. The citywide ratio of homestead to non-homestead property currently stands at 53/47. The overall ratio of homestead to non-homestead property has decreased due to the increase in new multi-family rental properties. The chart shows percentages of homesteaded residential units over time and the ownership rate is consistent with the last several years. 90% of single family detached homes were owner occupied and 67% of condos/townhomes were owner occupied in the first half of 2016. Chart 7: Percentage of Owner Occupied Units since 2006 Large Single Family Homes One of the city’s housing goals is to increase the number of larger homes available in the city. “Large single family homes” are being defined as exceeding 1,500 square feet of living space, having 3 or more bedrooms, 2 or more baths, and at minimum a 2 car garage. According to the Assessing Department, 2,216 – or 19% – of SLP single family homes meet this threshold. This is an increase of 41 homes since 2015 (due to additions and demo/rebuilds). Although this size home is not considered large when compared to newly constructed housing, it is when compared to all SLP homes where 75% of single family homes have a foundation size less than 1,200 square feet. 47% of single family homes have less than 1,200 square feet above ground. 97 97 96 93 93 93 91 89 89 90 9091928989 80 75 70 67 66 67 69 0 50 100 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 1st half 2016PercentageYEAR % Owner Occupied (Homesteaded) Units Single Family Detached Homes Condos & Townhomes Special Study Session Meeting of September 6 (Item No. 2) Title: Multi-Family Development Rental/Condo Mkt & 2016 Semi-Annual Housing Prgs Activity Report Page 10 Affordable Housing 2016 affordability limits for ownership and rental housing is now set at 80% of the area median income for both rental and ownership housing. In 2016, the metro area median income (AMI) for a household of four is $85,800. Under these limits, a family of four can earn up to $65,700 to qualify for affordable housing. Below is a chart showing the number of market rate affordable rental units in St. Louis Park with affordable levels at 60% and 80% AMI based on the St. Louis Park Housing Authority (SLPHA) Rental Survey. Chart 8: Market Rate Affordable Rental Units in St. Louis Park # of bedrooms Rent at 60% # of units affordable at 60% Rent at 80% # of units affordable at 80% Efficiency $901 76 $1,201 178 1 bedroom $966 2173 $1,288 2538 2 bedroom $1,159 1829 $1,545 2434 3 bedroom $1,338 168 $1,784 148 4 bedroom $1,494 10 $1,992 Total 4,256 at 60% AMI 5,933 at 80% AMI *Rental rates based on Met Council data and units reported in the SLPHA Rental Survey The (SLPHA) Rental Survey had a response rate of 87% of rental units. Although the response rate was high this does not represent all rentals in the city. Total non-homestead units = 11,483 Rental units responding to the rental survey = 8417 Rental Survey reported affordable units at 60% AMI = 4256 units o 4256 units is 51% of the reported rental units o 4256 units is 37% of total non-homestead units Rental Survey reported affordable units at 80% AMI = 5933 units o 5933 units is 70% of the reported rental units o 5933 affordable units is 52% of all non-homestead units. All of the reported affordable apartment units at 60% were built prior to 1987. Owner Occupied The 2016 affordable ownership purchase price is $235,500 or less. The housing matrix also shows the data for home ownership at the 60% AMI rate and that purchase price is $180,500. In 2016, 6671 owner occupied homes are considered affordable based on valuation data from assessing. This is 51% of the owner occupied housing stock and 27% of the total housing units. This is a decrease of nearly 400 units because of the decrease in AMI and the subsequent decrease of $5,000 to the purchase price that is considered affordable. Special Study Session Meeting of September 6 (Item No. 2) Title: Multi-Family Development Rental/Condo Mkt & 2016 Semi-Annual Housing Prgs Activity Report Page 11 St. Louis Park Housing Matrix June 30, 2016 Housing Units by Type Large Single Family Homes, Affordable, and Senior Housing Housing Type Housing Units Net Units added in 2016 Owner Occupied (Homestead) Non Homesteaded and/or Rental Large Single Family Homes 2016 Affordable Market Rate Owner Occupied Units 60% | 80% 2016 Reported Affordable Market Rate Rental Units* 60% | 80% Public Subsidized Affordable Units, Includes Section 8 Housing Units Senior Designated Single Family Detached 11,603 47% 0 10,466 1,137 2216 885 4766 83 237 37 Duplex 432 2% 0 152 280 99 147 Condos and townhomes 3543 14% 18** 2431 1112 1602 1905 137 252 60 Apartments 8848 36% 0 8848 3937 5298 879 958 COOPs 106 <1% 0 106 106 Totals 24,532 18 13,049 53% 11,483 47% 2216 19% 2487 19% 6671 51% 4256 37% 5932 52% 916 8% 1124 5% % of SF Homes % of Homestead % of Non-Homestead % of Non-Homestead % of Total Housing Units The percentage of owner occupied (homesteaded) units to rental or non-owner occupied (non-homesteaded) units has shifted from the 60 homesteaded/40 non-homesteaded ratio of the early 2000's to 53% homesteaded/47% non-homesteaded. This is due in part to a change in homestead status of approximately 1,200 condominium and townhouse units since the early 2000s and the addition of new multi-family rental units. Met Council revised the affordable housing income standards and now considers both rental and owner occupied housing units affordable at 80% AMI. This chart shows both owner occupied and rental units affordable at 60% AMI and 80% AMI. More data is on the following page related to affordable rents based on the number of bedrooms in a unit. * Reported Affordable Market Rate Rental Units based on SLPHA Rental Study. 87% of rental units completed the survey. The matrix above shows 37% of rental units are affordable as a percentage of non-homestead properties, 51% of the reported rental units are affordable. Data source: SLP Community Development, Development Activity in St. Louis Park, SLP Inspections and Assessing. **Added condo units are new parcels at Wooddale Flats. The developer amended their prior CIC to add three buildings and their units. It will be amended again in the future to add the last two buildings which won’t officially exist in assessing data until next year. Special Study Session Meeting of September 6 (Item No. 2) Title: Multi-Family Development Rental/Condo Mkt & 2016 Semi-Annual Housing Prgs Activity ReportPage 12 Project Developer Planning Approval Type Total Units Status/ Completion McGurgan (owner) 4525 W 4th St Cornerstone Custom Const. (Builder)2006 Single ‐Family 1 Completed 2007 Hoigaard Village Harmony Vista & Camerata 5650 W 36th St Frank Dunbar 2006 Apartment 78 Unit Apt / 220 Unit Apt Completed 2008 Inglewood Condos 3125 Inglewood Ave Andrew Brenner 2006 Condo 6 Completed 2008 Park Place II Apartments "The Gables" 1361 Hampshire Ave S Bigos 2006 Apartment 49 Constructed 2008 Anna & Joel Thompson(owner) 4515 W 42nd St C.B. Hadley (Builder) 2007 Single‐Family 1 Completed 2008 Richard & Adrienne Harrison (Owner) 2600 Natchez Creek Hill Custom Homes (Builder)2008 Single ‐Family 1 Completed 2009 Ellipse 3920 Excelsior Blvd Bader 2008 Condo 132 Complete 2011 TowerLight 3601 Wooddale Ave S Greco 2008 Senior Apartment 115 Completed 2013 The Flats at West End 5310 16th St West The Excelsior Groups 2010 Apartment 119 Completed 2013 Shaun Smith (Owner) 2005 Louisiana Andrew Hewey Const. (Builder) 2010 Single ‐Family 1 Completed 2011 Hoigaard Village Medley Row & The Adaigo 5650 W 36th St Frank Dunbar 2011 Apartment & Rowhomes 22 Rental Rowhomes / 100 unit Apt Completed 2013 36 Park (Park Summit) 3601 Park Center Blvd EJ Plesko 2011 Apartment 192 Unit Apt Completed 2012 Eldridge 1st Addition Rob Eldridge 2011 Single‐Family 4 new SF lot (5 SF lots total) Constructed 2012 Fretham 12th Add Curt Fretham 2011 Single‐Family 5 new SF lots (6 SF lots total)Constructed 2013 Gateway Assisted Living 7115 Wayzata Blvd Viren Gori 2012 Assisted Living 22 Complete 2014 Calhoun Apt Homes Cty Rd 25 & Inglewood Ave Andrew Brenner 2012 Apartment 7 Completed 2014 E2 3920 Excelsior Blvd Bader 2012 Apartment 58 Completed 2013 Kaiser Subdivision Rob Eldridge 2012 Single‐Family 2 Constructed 2013 Eliot 6800 Cedar Lake Rd Dan Hunt 2013 Apartment & Single‐ Family 138 Apt units / 2 SF Apartments Completed 2015 SF to be completed 2016 Wooddale Flats 3998 Wooddale Ave S Gatehouse Prop Ltd 2013 Condos 33 Under Construction Fretham 14th Addition Curt Fretham 2013 Single‐Family 1 new lot created (2 SF lots total) Completed 2014 Millenium at West End 1621 West End Blvd DLC Residential 2014 Apartment 158 Completed 2015 Eldridge 5th Addition 7701 Edgebrook Rob Eldridge 2014 Single‐Family 1 Constructed 2015 5609 Wood Ln Gavin May 2014 Single ‐Family 1 Constructed 2015 4101 31st St Apts 4101 31st St Josh Brandsted 2014 Apartment 13 Completed 2015 4106 Forest Lane ALTUS Architect/Sunny & Tiffiny Han 2015 Single ‐Family 1 Under Construction 4300 Brookside JP Brooks 2015 Single‐Family 1 Under Construction Central Park West Phase 1 Apartment Building DLC Residential 2015 Apartment 199 Under Construction The Shoreham mixed‐use building Bader Development 2015 Apartment/comm. 148 (30 units are affordable) Under Construction 4800 Excelsior Weidner 2015 Apartment 164 (18 affordable) Under Constructino Total Units Added since 2006 Single Family 22 Condo 171 Townhome Ownership 0 Townhome Rental 22 Apartments 1543 Senior Apartments 115 Senior Assisted Living 22 Senior Condos 0 Total Units Added since 2003 1895 Housing Development Project List Special Study Session Meeting of September 6 (Item No. 2) Title: Multi-Family Development Rental/Condo Mkt & 2016 Semi-Annual Housing Prgs Activity Report Page 13 4. RELATED ISSUES Foreclosures Foreclosures are measured by the number of sheriff sales. The number of residential foreclosures in St. Louis Park and throughout Hennepin County has been declining since 2010. The chart below shows foreclosures since 2006. Foreclosures continue to decline and are at the lowest level since we began tracking the data. Chart 9: St. Louis Park Residential Foreclosures by Year since 2006 The trend chart below shows foreclosure by housing type over time. Chart 10: Residential Foreclosures by Housing Type *Townhome & DB = Townhome and Double Bungalow/Duplex 76 87 133 92 191 163 122 59 54 47 18 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 1st half 2016Number of Sherrif Sales Year Residential Foreclosures by Year 56 78 93 63 106 109 82 45 39 28 10209 30 27 54 40 30 9 14 15 6 0 0 10 2 31 8 10 5 1 4 20 40 80 120 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 1st half 2016Number Sherrif SalesYear Residential Foreclosures by Housing Type Single Family Detached Condos Townhome & DB Special Study Session Meeting of September 6 (Item No. 2) Title: Multi-Family Development Rental/Condo Mkt & 2016 Semi-Annual Housing Prgs Activity Report Page 14 5. ST. LOUIS PARK HUD FEDERALLY FUNDED HOUSING PROGRAMS: UPDATE The St. Louis Park Housing Authority (HA) administers programs that ensure the availability of safe and desirable housing options in the St. Louis Park community. These programs include the Public Housing program, Housing Choice Voucher rental assistance program, Continuum of Care rental assistance program, and TRAILS family self-sufficiency program. The HA currently serves over 500 eligible, low-income households through their housing programs. Public Housing The HA owns a low-rise apartment building (108 one-bedroom units and 2 two-bedroom caretaker units) built in 1975, and 37 scattered site single-family units (3 to 5 bedrooms) acquired and constructed between 1974 and 1996. Although the low-rise building is designated for general occupancy, priority is given to elderly and disabled. The single-family scattered units house families with children. The HA also holds the HUD Annual Contributions Contract (ACC) and maintains a waiting list for 12 two-bedroom Public Housing apartment units located at Louisiana Court. These units are owned and managed by Project for Pride in Living. The units and occupancy rates for the Public Housing units are noted in the table. Public Housing Total Units 1-BR 2-BR 3-BR 4-BR 5-BR Occupancy June 30, 2016 Hamilton House 108 108 100% Scattered Site Single Family 37 0 0 17 17 3 100% Louisiana Court, Metropolitan Housing Opportunity (MHOP) Units 12 12 100% Total (bedroom size) 108 12 17 17 3 Total 157 100% Continuum of Care (Permanent Rental Assistance) The Continuum of Care Program (CoC) is designed to link rental assistance with supportive services for hard-to-reach homeless persons with disabilities (primarily those who are seriously mentally ill or have chronic problems with alcohol, drugs or both) and their families. Grants are provided to be used for permanent housing which must be matched with supportive services that are equal in value to the amount of rental assistance and appropriate to the needs of population to be served. St. Louis Park is the grant recipient and we partner with two sponsor organizations that administer supportive housing programs. The Housing Authority administered 21 units of Continuum of Care assistance in the first half of 2016. Continuum of Care Rental Assistance Units Continuum of Care Rental units in SLP Perspectives Inc. 11 **Wayside Supportive Housing 2 Total in St. Louis Park 13 CoC units administered by SLP HA but located outside of St. Louis Park Project for Pride In Living (PPL)/Camden 8 TOTAL CoC Units Administered by HA 21 ** Perspective grant provides funding for two units of Continuum of Care Rental Assistance at Wayside House. Special Study Session Meeting of September 6 (Item No. 2) Title: Multi-Family Development Rental/Condo Mkt & 2016 Semi-Annual Housing Prgs Activity Report Page 15 Housing Choice Voucher Program (HCV) The HA is allocated 268 Housing Choice Vouchers. The HA typically administers less than the allocated vouchers based on HUD funding levels; however, we are in the process of issuing 10 vouchers. This rent assistance program provides rent subsidies for low-income individuals and families in privately owned, existing market rate housing units. The rent subsidy is paid directly to the owner of the rental property by the HA with funds provided by HUD. The HA offers both tenant-based and project-based vouchers. Forty vouchers of the HA’s allocation are designated for use in three privately owned developments (Excelsior & Grand, Vail Place, and Wayside) and are referred to as project-based vouchers. Housing Choice Voucher – Lease Up Report June 30, 2016 Units HUD Allocated Vouchers 268 Vouchers Issued (Executed, Pending, Outstanding and Leased Project Based) 239 Unleased Project-Based (PB) 2 Vouchers Outstanding 3 Executed St. Louis Park Contracts: Housing Choice Vouchers 194 Excelsior & Grand 16 Vail Place 6 Wayside Supportive Housing 15 231 Port-Ins 38 Port-Outs 47 Pending Port-Outs 3 Executed and Pending 234 Total Administered 225 Summary: % of Vouchers Utilized % Utilized, Pending, Outstanding & Unleased PB 86% 89% Waiting Lists Assisted Housing Waiting List as of June 30, 2016 1-BR 2-BR 3-BR 4-BR 5-BR Total Public Housing 386 132 434 25 30 1007 Section 8 213 Excelsior & Grand 55 3-BR list opened in June, 4-BR applications are being processed and will be reflected in the 2016 Annual Report 1275 Stable HOME Rental Assistance Program The Stable HOME program provides rent assistance throughout suburban Hennepin County to low income singles and families who were homeless or would otherwise be at risk of homelessness. This program is funded with federal HOME funds allocated to the county. Single participants are also participants in the county’s Employment Pays program and families are also in the Stable Families Initiative program. For both groups the rent assistance participation is limited to 2 years, during which time they establish good rental histories and relationships and work with direct assistance from service providers to improve their earnings to the point where they do not need rent assistance. The program is administered by the St. Louis Park Housing Authority, but participants are free to choose a rental unit anywhere in suburban Hennepin County. 20 families throughout suburban Hennepin County were served by this program in the first half of 2016. Special Study Session Meeting of September 6 (Item No. 2) Title: Multi-Family Development Rental/Condo Mkt & 2016 Semi-Annual Housing Prgs Activity Report Page 16 6. PROGRAM DESCRIPTIONS Technical, Design, and Conservation Services Architectural Design Service This service provides an architectural consultation for residents to assist with brainstorming remodeling possibilities and to raise the awareness of design possibilities for expansions. Residents select an approved architect from a pool developed in conjunction with the MN Chapter of the American Institute of Architects. All homeowners considering renovations are eligible for this service regardless of income; however, to ensure committed participants, residents make a $25 co- pay. Remodeling/Rehab Advisor The intention of this service is to help residents improve their homes (either maintenance or value added improvements) by providing technical help before and during the construction process. All homeowners are eligible for this service regardless of income. Resident surveys indicated that homeowners valued the service and would recommend it to others. The city contracts with the Center for Energy and Environment (CEE) for this free service to homeowners. Home Energy Squad Enhanced Visit Home Energy Squad Enhanced program is a comprehensive residential energy program designed to help residents save money and energy and stay comfortable in their homes. The program which began in March, 2012, is administered by the Center for Energy and Environment (CEE). The city pays $50 per resident visit which is leveraged with funds from Xcel Energy, Center Point Energy and CEE. The cost per resident is $50 per enhanced visit. The home energy squad consultant evaluates energy saving opportunities and installs the energy- efficiency materials the homeowner choses including: door weather stripping, water heater blanket, programmable thermostat, compact fluorescent light bulbs, high efficiency shower heads and faucet aerators. They will also perform diagnostic tests including a blower door test to measure the home for air leaks, complete an insulation inspection, safety check the home’s heating system and water heater and help with next steps such as finding insulation contractors. All single family and duplex homeowners are eligible. Renters qualify for the installed visit ($30) without diagnostic tests. The Home Energy Squad Enhanced visits qualified residents for CEE’s low interest financing and utility rebates and they also notify residents of the city loan and rebate opportunities. Annual Home Remodeling Fair The cities and school district community education departments of St. Louis Park, Hopkins, Minnetonka, and Golden Valley co-sponsor the annual home remodeling fair. The fair provides residents an opportunity to attend seminars, talk with vendors and city staff about permits, zoning, home improvement loans, and environmental issues related to remodeling. The fair is a self- sustaining event and vendor registration fees cover the costs. Home Remodeling Tour The annual tour is designed to meet the housing goal to remodel and expand single family owner occupied homes. The self-guided tour of six homes provides a showcase of a variety of home remodeling projects to provide ideas, information, and inspiration to other residents considering remodeling. Special Study Session Meeting of September 6 (Item No. 2) Title: Multi-Family Development Rental/Condo Mkt & 2016 Semi-Annual Housing Prgs Activity Report Page 17 Construction Management Plan The city recognizes that many households are looking for larger homes. As a result, significant additions and/or tearing down of existing homes and rebuilding larger homes is becoming more common. Because St. Louis Park is a fully built community, these major additions and construction of new homes impacts the surrounding neighbors. Effective November 15, 2014, major additions (second story additions or additions of 500 square feet or more), demolitions and new construction need to comply with a Construction Management Plan (CMP) per City Code 6-71. Major additions, tear downs and new construction are required to send a written neighborhood notification to neighbors within 200 feet of the property. Demolitions and/or new construction will also require a neighborhood meeting and signage. Financial Programs Discount Loan Program This program encourages residents to improve their homes by “discounting” the interest rate on the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MN Housing) home improvement loans. Residents with incomes of $67,200 or less qualify for a greater discount than those with incomes of $99,500 or less. Eligible improvements include most home improvement projects with the exception of luxury items such as pools and spas. The city contracts with CEE for loan administration. Implementation of discounting of MHFA loans began in late 1999 as a pilot project. Move – Up Transformation Loan The purpose of this loan is to encourage residents with incomes at or below 120% of median area income ($102,950 for a family of four) to expand their homes. The program provides deferred loans for 25% of the applicant’s home expansion project cost, with a maximum loan of $25,000. The revolving loan pool will continue to fund future expansions. This loan requires significant upfront work by the residents, from deciding on the scope of the project to selecting contractors. Loan guidelines are: Only residents making significant expansions are eligible. The minimum project cost must exceed $35,000. The maximum loan amount is $25,000. The loan has 0% interest with a carrying cost fee of 3% paid by the borrower which covers the lender’s administrative fee. Green Remodeling Program & Energy Rebates The Green Remodeling Program includes the Home Energy Squad Enhanced home visit program, use of energy rebates, and access to CEE’s Home Energy Loan. The city provides a match of 50% of gas and electric utility rebates for energy efficient furnaces, water heaters, air conditioners and qualifying air sealing and insulation. The average rebate in the first half of 2016 was approximately $260. CEE also provided low interest loans to residents making qualifying energy improvements and St. Louis Park residents can take advantage of this loan. This energy improvement loan has no income restrictions and there is no cost to the city. Special Study Session Meeting of September 6 (Item No. 2) Title: Multi-Family Development Rental/Condo Mkt & 2016 Semi-Annual Housing Prgs Activity Report Page 18 Meeting: Special Study Session Meeting Date: September 6, 2016 Written Report: 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Proposed Charter Amendments Related to Municipal Primary Elections and Candidate Filing Requirements RECOMMENDED ACTION: No formal action required at this time. This item was prepared at the request of the Council. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council want to ask the Charter Commission to consider a proposal to amend the City Charter to eliminate the option for a municipal primary election and to change the filing requirements for candidates for municipal offices? SUMMARY: At the study session on May 9, 2016 the City Council discussed several topics related to elections including the ranked choice voting method and the filing requirements for candidates for municipal offices. At that time the consensus of the Council was that a switch to the ranked choice voting method was not warranted and that the more practical course of action was to direct staff to prepare a proposal for the Charter Commission that would achieve the following objectives: - Eliminate the need to hold a municipal primary election when 3 or more candidates file for any city office. All candidates filing for municipal offices would automatically be placed on the General Election ballot. - Amend the filing requirements for candidates for municipal office to either increase the filing fee, increase the number of signatures, or some combination of both options. The intent of the proposed amendments is to address the immediate concerns of the Council including: cost of holding primary elections, staff resources related administration of primary elections, low voter turnout at primary elections, lack of serious candidates filing for municipal office, and the undue burdens placed on candidates to run campaigns for potentially both a primary and general election. The proposed recommendation to the Charter Commission is to eliminate Section 4.03 of the City Charter related to Primary Elections and to amend Section 4.06 to increase the number of signatures required on a nomination petition from 15 to 30 and to increase the corresponding filing fee from $20 to $50. Staff feels that this recommendation would sufficiently address the concerns raised by the Council, but would not be overly burdensome requirements that would preclude an individual from filing for a municipal office. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The 2017 elections budget was prepared based on previous Council direction to move forward with a proposal to the Charter Commission to eliminate the option for a municipal primary election. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion Exhibit A – Minnesota Statute 410.12, Subd. 7, Exhibit B – Minnesota Statute 205.13, Subd. 3, Filing Fees Prepared by: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Approved by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director Special Study Session Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 3) Page 2 Title: Proposed Charter Amendments Related to Municipal Primary Elections and Candidate Filing Requirements DISCUSSION What is the process to amend the City Charter? Amendments to the City Charter are governed by Minnesota Statute 410.12 (attached Exhibit A). In the past, amendments to the City Charter have been enacted by ordinance in accordance with the procedure outlined in M.S. 410.12, Subd. 7. The City Attorney’s office will provide direction and guidance to both the Council and the Charter Commission throughout this process to ensure that all procedural requirements and deadlines are met. Is the City required to hold Municipal Primary Elections? Minnesota Election Law states municipal primary elections may be held in any city. As a home rule charter city, St. Louis Park has chosen to hold a Municipal Primary Election whenever three (3) or more candidates file for any elective City office. Primary Elections are held in accordance with the provisions contained in Section 4.03 of the City Charter. Does the school district hold primary elections? Minnesota Election Law also affords school districts the option to choose whether or not to hold primary elections. The St. Louis Park School District has chosen not to hold primary elections for School Board offices. This means that all candidates filing for a School Board office appear on the General Election ballot. How many other cities in Hennepin County hold Municipal Primary Elections? Of the 45 cities in Hennepin County, only 11 cities have the option to hold municipal primary elections (Bloomington, Brooklyn Center, Brooklyn Park, Crystal, Dayton, Independence, Minnetonka, Richfield, Robbinsdale, Rogers, and St. Louis Park). The remaining 34 cities do not hold municipal primaries. How many Municipal Primary Elections have been held in St. Louis Park? 9 Municipal Primary Elections have been required in St. Louis Park since 1975. 7 primaries involved only 1 or 2 wards 2 primaries were citywide Municipal Primary Elections cost approximately $1,000 per precinct. How many candidates have filed for City offices in the previous 3 municipal elections? 2015: 4 candidates for Mayor, 1 candidate for Councilmember At-Large A, 2 candidates for Councilmember At-Large B 2013: 1 candidate for Ward 1 Councilmember, 1 candidate for Ward 2 Councilmember, 3 candidates for Ward 3 Councilmember, 2 candidates for Ward 4 Councilmember 2011: 1 candidate for Mayor, 2 candidates for Councilmember At-Large A, 3 candidates for Councilmember At-Large B What are the current requirements for candidates filing for office in St. Louis Park? Candidates are required to pay a $20 filing fee in addition to submitting a nomination petition signed by at least 15 currently registered electors qualified to vote for the office specified on the petition. Is there a limit to what the City can charge candidates filing for a municipal office? Candidate filing fees are governed by Minnesota Statute 205.13, Subd. 3 (attached Exhibit B). A home rule charter city that sets filing fees by authority provided in city charter is not subject to the fee limits imposed by statute. Special Study Session Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 3) Page 3 Title: Proposed Charter Amendments Related to Municipal Primary Elections and Candidate Filing Requirements What are the candidate filing requirements in neighboring cities? City Filing Fee Nominating Petition? Primary Election Option? Even/Odd Year Elections St. Louis Park $20 Yes Yes Odd Edina $5 No No Even Hopkins $25 No No Odd Minnetonka $5 No Yes Odd Golden Valley $5 No No Odd Richfield $25 Yes Yes Even Eden Prairie $5 No No Even Plymouth $5 No No Even Bloomington $50 No Yes Odd Minneapolis Mayor = $500; Council = $250 No No Odd NEXT STEPS: If no additional comments or feedback is received from the Council, this information will be presented to the Charter Commission for review and consideration of the proposed amendments to the City Charter. Special Study Session Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 3) Page 4 Title: Proposed Charter Amendments Related to Municipal Primary Elections and Candidate Filing Requirements EXHIBIT A 410.12 AMENDMENTS. Subdivision 1. Proposals. The charter commission may propose amendments to such charter and shall do so upon the petition of voters equal in number to five percent of the total votes cast at the last previous state general election in the city. Proposed charter amendments must be submitted at least 17 weeks before the general election. Only registered voters are eligible to sign the petition. All petitions circulated with respect to a charter amendment shall be uniform in character and shall have attached thereto the text of the proposed amendment in full; except that in the case of a proposed amendment containing more than 1,000 words, a true and correct copy of the same may be filed with the city clerk, and the petition shall then contain a summary of not less than 50 nor more than 300 words setting forth in substance the nature of the proposed amendment. Such summary shall contain a statement of the objects and purposes of the amendment proposed and an outline of any proposed new scheme or frame work of government and shall be sufficient to inform the signers of the petition as to what change in government is sought to be accomplished by the amendment. The summary, together with a copy of the proposed amendment, shall first be submitted to the charter commission for its approval as to form and substance. The commission shall within ten days after such submission to it, return the same to the proposers of the amendment with such modifications in statement as it may deem necessary in order that the summary may fairly comply with the requirements above set forth. Subd. 1a. Alternative methods of charter amendment. A home rule charter may be amended only by following one of the alternative methods of amendment provided in subdivisions 1 to 7. Subd. 2. Petitions. The signatures to such petition need not all be appended to one paper, but to each separate petition there shall be attached an affidavit of the circulator thereof as provided by this section. A petition must contain each petitioner's signature in ink or indelible pencil and must indicate after the signature the place of residence by street and number, or other description sufficient to identify the place. There shall appear on each petition the names and addresses of five electors of the city, and on each paper the names and addresses of the same five electors, who, as a committee of the petitioners, shall be regarded as responsible for the circulation and filing of the petition. Subd. 3. May be assembled as one petition. All petition papers for a proposed amendment shall be assembled and filed with the charter commission as one instrument. Within ten days after such petition is transmitted to the city council, the city clerk shall determine whether each paper of the petition is properly attested and whether the petition is signed by a sufficient number of voters. The city clerk shall declare any petition paper entirely invalid which is not attested by the circulator thereof as required in this section. Upon completing an examination of the petition, the city clerk shall certify the result of the examination to the council. If the city clerk shall certify that the petition is insufficient the city clerk shall set forth in a certificate the particulars in which it is defective and shall at once notify the committee of the petitioners of the findings. A petition may be amended at any time within ten days after the making of a certificate of insufficiency by the city clerk, by filing a supplementary petition upon additional papers signed and filed as provided in case of an original petition. The city clerk shall within five days after such amendment is filed, make examination of the amended petition, and if the certificate shall show the petition still to be insufficient, the city clerk shall file it in the city clerk's office and notify the committee of the petitioners of the findings and no further action shall be had on such insufficient petition. The finding of the insufficiency of a petition shall not prejudice the filing of a new petition for the same purpose. Subd. 4. Election. Amendments shall be submitted to the qualified voters at a general or special election and published as in the case of the original charter. The form of the ballot shall be fixed by the governing body. The statement of the question on the ballot shall be sufficient to Special Study Session Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 3) Page 5 Title: Proposed Charter Amendments Related to Municipal Primary Elections and Candidate Filing Requirements identify the amendment clearly and to distinguish the question from every other question on the ballot at the same time. If 51 percent of the votes cast on any amendment are in favor of its adoption, copies of the amendment and certificates shall be filed, as in the case of the original charter and the amendment shall take effect in 30 days from the date of the election or at such other time as is fixed in the amendment. Subd. 5. Amendments proposed by council. The council of any city having a home rule charter may propose charter amendments to the voters by ordinance. Any ordinance proposing such an amendment shall be submitted to the charter commission. Within 60 days thereafter, the charter commission shall review the proposed amendment but before the expiration of such period the commission may extend the time for review for an additional 90 days by filing with the city clerk its resolution determining that an additional time for review is needed. After reviewing the proposed amendment, the charter commission shall approve or reject the proposed amendment or suggest a substitute amendment. The commission shall promptly notify the council of the action taken. On notification of the charter commission's action, the council may submit to the people, in the same manner as provided in subdivision 4, the amendment originally proposed by it or the substitute amendment proposed by the charter commission. The amendment shall become effective only when approved by the voters as provided in subdivision 4. If so approved it shall be filed in the same manner as other amendments. Nothing in this subdivision precludes the charter commission from proposing charter amendments in the manner provided by subdivision 1. Subd. 6. Amendments, cities of the fourth class. The council of a city of the fourth class having a home rule charter may propose charter amendments by ordinance without submission to the charter commission. Such ordinance, if enacted, shall be adopted by at least a four-fifths vote of all its members after a public hearing upon two weeks' published notice containing the text of the proposed amendment and shall be approved by the mayor and published as in the case of other ordinances. The council shall submit the proposed amendment to the people in the manner provided in subdivision 4, but not sooner than three months after the passage of the ordinance. The amendment becomes effective only when approved by the voters as provided in subdivision 4. If so approved, it shall be filed in the same manner as other amendments. Subd. 7. Amendment by ordinance. Upon recommendation of the charter commission the city council may enact a charter amendment by ordinance. Within one month of receiving a recommendation to amend the charter by ordinance, the city must publish notice of a public hearing on the proposal and the notice must contain the text of the proposed amendment. The city council must hold the public hearing on the proposed charter amendment at least two weeks but not more than one month after the notice is published. Within one month of the public hearing, the city council must vote on the proposed charter amendment ordinance. The ordinance is enacted if it receives an affirmative vote of all members of the city council and is approved by the mayor and published as in the case of other ordinances. An ordinance amending a city charter shall not become effective until 90 days after passage and publication or at such later date as is fixed in the ordinance. Within 60 days after passage and publication of such an ordinance, a petition requesting a referendum on the ordinance may be filed with the city clerk. The petition must be signed by registered voters equal in number to at least five percent of the registered voters in the city or 2,000, whichever is less. If the requisite petition is filed within the prescribed period, the ordinance shall not become effective until it is approved by the voters as in the case of charter amendments submitted by the charter commission, the council, or by petition of the voters, except that the council may submit the ordinance at any general or special election held at least 60 days after submission of the petition, or it may reconsider its action in adopting the ordinance. As far as practicable the requirements of subdivisions 1 to 3 apply to petitions submitted under this section, to an ordinance amending a charter, and to the filing of such ordinance when approved by the voter Special Study Session Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 3) Page 6 Title: Proposed Charter Amendments Related to Municipal Primary Elections and Candidate Filing Requirements EXHIBIT B 205.13 CANDIDATES, FILING Subd. 3. Filing fees. (a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, the filing fee for a municipal office is as follows: (1) in first class cities, $20; (2) in second and third class cities, $5; and (3) in fourth class cities and towns, $2. (b) A home rule charter or statutory city may adopt, by ordinance, a filing fee of a different amount not to exceed the following: (1) in first class cities, $80; (2) in second and third class cities, $40; and (3) in fourth class cities, $15. (c) A home rule charter city that sets filing fees by authority provided in city charter is not subject to the fee limits in this section. Meeting: Economic Development Authority Meeting Date: September 6, 2016 Minutes: 3a UNOFFICIAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA AUGUST 15, 2016 1. Call to Order President Mavity called the meeting to order at 7:25 p.m. Commissioners present: President Anne Mavity, Tim Brausen, Gregg Lindberg, Susan Sanger, and Jake Spano. Commissioners absent: Steve Hallfin and Thom Miller. Staff present: Executive Director (Mr. Harmening), and Recording Secretary (Ms. Pappas). 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes 3a. Economic Development Authority Meeting Minutes July 18, 2016 It was moved by Commissioner Sanger, seconded by Commissioner Lindberg, to approve the EDA minutes as presented. The motion passed 5-0 (Commissioners Hallfin and Miller absent). 3b. Economic Development Authority Meeting Minutes August 1, 2016 It was moved by Commissioner Brausen, seconded by Commissioner Sanger, to approve the EDA minutes as presented. The motion passed 5-0 (Commissioners Hallfin and Miller absent). 4. Approval of Agenda The EDA agenda was approved as presented. 5. Reports - None 6. Old Business - None Economic Development Authority Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 3a) Page 2 Title: Economic Development Authority Meeting Minutes of August 15, 2016 7. New Business 7a. Subordination Agreement with PNC Bank – Cedar Lake Rd Apartments LLC. Resolution No. 16-18 Mr. Locke presented the report. He noted that the EDA and city entered into a contract for private redevelopment with Cedar Lake Road Apartments, LLC on July 1, 2014, related to the redevelopment of 6800 and 6720 Cedar Lake Road (former Eliot School property) and construction of the Eliot Park Apartments (now the Siena Apartments). Under the contract, the redeveloper agreed to construct two apartment buildings with a total of 138 market rate units, as well as two single family homes. In order to make the project financially feasible, the EDA agreed to reimburse the redeveloper up to $1,100,000 from Tax Increment Financing, generated by the project for qualified public redevelopment costs associated with the redevelopment of the former school property. On July 18, the EDA approved the issuance of a TIF revenue note up to $1.1 million to Cedar Lake Road Apartments LLC. Soon thereafter the redeveloper closed on its permanent financing for the project with PNC Bank, National Association. It was noted the proposed agreement has been reviewed by the EDA’s legal counsel, who recommends its approval. It was moved by Commissioner Brausen, seconded by Commissioner Spano, to waive the reading and adopt EDA Resolution No. 16-18, approving the Subordination Agreement with PNC Bank, National Association relative to the Redevelopment Contract with Cedar Lake Road Apartments LLC. The motion passed 5-0 (Commissioners Hallfin and Miller absent). 8. Communications - None 9. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 7:29 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, Secretary AnneMavity, President Meeting: Economic Development Authority Meeting Date: September 6, 2016 Consent Agenda Item: 5a EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Approval of EDA Disbursements RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to accept for filing EDA Disbursement Claims for the period of July 23 through August 26, 2016. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the EDA desire to approve EDA disbursements in accordance with Article V – Administration of Finances, of the EDA Bylaws? SUMMARY: The Finance Division prepares this report on a monthly basis for the EDA to review and approve. The attached reports show both EDA disbursements paid by physical check and those by wire transfer or Automated Clearing House (ACH) when applicable. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Review and approval of the information follows the EDA’s Bylaws and provides another layer of oversight to further ensure fiscal stewardship. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: EDA Disbursements Prepared by: Patricia A. Sulander, Accountant Reviewed by: Tim Simon, Chief Financial Officer Approved by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director 8/26/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:39:45R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 1Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/26/20167/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 100,670.85ADAGIO LLC HOIGAARD VILLAGE DEVELOPER TAX INCREMNT PYMT 100,670.85 79,419.00AQUILA SENIOR LLC AQUILA COMMONS G & A DEVELOPER TAX INCREMNT PYMT 79,419.00 63,370.32BELT LINE PROPERTIES INC WOLFE LAKE COMMERCIAL TIF G&A DEVELOPER TAX INCREMNT PYMT 63,370.32 30,424.20CEDAR LAKE ROAD APARTMENTS LLC ELIOT PARK TIF DIST G&A DEVELOPER TAX INCREMNT PYMT 30,424.20 36,900.00CI UTILITIES WEST END TIF DIST G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 36,900.00 94,259.04COB LLC HILLCREST (NESTLE REDEV PROJ)OTHER TECHNICAL SERVICES 94,259.04 8,085.94DMD PROPERTIES LLC MCGARVEY COFFEE SITE BOND PRINCIPAL 6,914.06MCGARVEY COFFEE SITE BOND INTEREST 15,000.00 627,201.14DUKE REALTY WEST END TIF DIST G&A DEVELOPER TAX INCREMNT PYMT 627,201.14 19,462.03EDGEWOOD INVESTORS LLC EDGEWOOD TIF DIST G & A DEVELOPER TAX INCREMNT PYMT 19,462.03 1,026.75EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC ELIOT PARK TIF DIST G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,027.00WEST END TIF DIST G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,027.00ELLIPSE ON EXC TIF DIST G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,027.00PARK CENTER HOUSING G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,027.00CSM TIF DIST G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,027.00MILL CITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,027.00PARK COMMONS G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,027.00EDGEWOOD TIF DIST G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,027.00ELMWOOD VILLAGE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 500.00HOIGAARD VILLAGE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,027.00WOLFE LAKE COMMERCIAL TIF G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,027.00AQUILA COMMONS G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,027.00HWY 7 BUSINESS CENTER G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES Economic Development Authority Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approval of EDA Disbursements Page 2 8/26/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:39:45R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 2Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/26/20167/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 12,823.75 62,759.84ELLIPSE II LLC ELLIPSE II G&A DEVELOPER TAX INCREMNT PYMT 62,759.84 147,473.34ELLIPSE ON EXCELSIOR LLC ELLIPSE ON EXC TIF DIST G&A DEVELOPER TAX INCREMNT PYMT 147,473.34 7,100.00FORECAST PUBLIC ART PUBLIC ART PUBLIC ART DEDICATION 7,100.00 398,936.76GOTTMAR II LLC PARK COMMONS G&A DEVELOPER TAX INCREMNT PYMT 398,936.76 634,485.48GOTTMAR LLC PARK COMMONS G&A DEVELOPER TAX INCREMNT PYMT 634,485.48 252.00GREEN HORIZONS 7015 WALKER-REYNOLDS WELD PROP LAND MAINTENANCE 102.004601 HWY 7 PROP ACQUISITION LAND MAINTENANCE 64.20MCGARVEY COFFEE SITE LAND MAINTENANCE 240.00HWY 7 & LOUISIANA LAND MAINTENANCE 658.20 59,694.11HIGHWAY 7 BUSINESS CENTER LLC HWY 7 BUSINESS CENTER G & A DEVELOPER TAX INCREMNT PYMT 59,694.11 3,622.50HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP INC DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A PLANNING 3,622.50 247.00KENNEDY & GRAVEN MCGARVEY COFFEE SITE LEGAL SERVICES 247.00 3,000.00LOCKRIDGE GRINDAL NAUEN PLLP DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A LEGAL SERVICES 3,000.00 21,883.72MEDLEY ROW LLC HOIGAARD VILLAGE DEVELOPER TAX INCREMNT PYMT 21,883.72 117,543.10METRO TRANSIT COMMISSION DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 117,543.10 Economic Development Authority Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approval of EDA Disbursements Page 3 8/26/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:39:45R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 3Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/26/20167/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 167,884.84MMP HS OPCO CSM TIF DIST G&A DEVELOPER TAX INCREMNT PYMT 167,884.84 45,381.54MMP PT OPCO CSM TIF DIST G&A DEVELOPER TAX INCREMNT PYMT 45,381.54 302,325.00MONEYGRAM PAYMENT SYSTEMS INC DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 302,325.00 1,924.00REDPATH & COMPANY DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A AUDITING AND ACCOUNTING SERVIC 1,924.00 219,882.40SIDAL REALTY CO LTD PARTNERSHIP LLLP MILL CITY G&A DEVELOPER TAX INCREMNT PYMT 219,882.40 83,308.86ST LOUIS PARK CONV & VISITORS BUREAU CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU COST REIMBURSEMENT-CVB 83,308.86 126,182.24WOODDALE CATERED LIVING OWNER LP WOODDALE POINTE DEVELOPER TAX INCREMNT PYMT 126,182.24 1,439.00XCELIGENT INC DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 1,439.00 Report Totals 3,485,262.26 Economic Development Authority Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approval of EDA Disbursements Page 4 Meeting: Economic Development Authority Meeting Date: September 6, 2016 Action Agenda Item: 7a EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: 2017 Preliminary HRA Levy Certification and Budget Adoption RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt EDA Resolution authorizing the proposed levy of a special benefit levy pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 469.033, Subdivision 6, and approval of the 2017 Preliminary HRA Levy and Budget for fiscal year 2017. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the EDA desire to continue to levy the full 0.0185% of estimated market value allowable for HRA purposes of $1,086,461. SUMMARY: The HRA levy was originally implemented in St. Louis Park due to legislative changes in 2001 which significantly reduced future tax increment revenues. The City Council elected at that time to use the levy proceeds for future infrastructure improvements in redevelopment areas. By law, these funds could also be used for other housing and redevelopment purposes. However they are committed to repaying the Development Fund via an interfund loan for the Highway 7 and Louisiana Ave project until 2018 or 2019 based on the current Long Range Financial Management Plan. Given this obligation, staff recommends the HRA Levy continue at the maximum allowed by law for the 2017 budget year. The HRA Levy cannot exceed 0.0185% of the estimated market value of the City. Therefore, staff has calculated the maximum HRA Levy for 2017 to be $1,086,461 based on valuation data from Hennepin County which is an increase of $75,253 or 7.44% from 2016. The EDA is allowed to authorize the HRA levy and then forward this recommendation to the City Council. Council action is required before certification, which is also scheduled to occur on September 6, 2016. All special taxing districts levies must be certified to the County auditor by September 15th. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The proposed levy will help support infrastructure in redevelopment areas. VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged community. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution 2017 HRA Levy Preliminary Budget Prepared by: Patricia A. Sulander, Accountant Reviewed by: Tim Simon, Chief Financial Officer Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Economic Development Authority Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 7a) Page 2 Title: 2017 Preliminary HRA Levy Certification and Budget Adoption EDA RESOLUTION NO. 16 - ____ AUTHORIZING THE PROPOSED LEVY OF A SPECIAL BENEFIT LEVY PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES, SECTION 469.033, SUBDIVISION 6 AND APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017 WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.090 to 469.108 (the “EDA Act”), the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park created the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority (the "Authority"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the EDA Act, the City Council granted to the Authority all of the powers and duties of a housing and redevelopment authority under the provisions of the Minnesota Statutes, sections 469.001 to 469.047 (the "HRA Act"); and WHEREAS, Section 469.033, Subdivision 6, of the HRA Act permits the Authority to levy and collect a special benefit levy of up to 0.0185 percent of estimated market value in the City upon all taxable real property within the City; and WHEREAS, the Authority desires to levy a special benefit levy in the amount of up to 0.0185 percent of estimated market value in the City for taxes payable in 2017; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 275.065, the Authority is required to adopt a proposed budget and a proposed tax levy and submit the same to the County Auditor by September 15; and WHEREAS, the Authority has before it for its consideration a copy of a proposed budget for its operations for the fiscal year 2017 and the amount of the proposed levy for collection in 2017 shall be based on this budget and the long range financial management plan, subject to any adjustments in the budget as finally approved prior to certification of the final special benefit levy. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Commissioners of the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority: 1. The proposed budget of $1,086,461 for the operations of the Authority in fiscal year 2017, as presented for consideration by the City Council, is hereby in all respects approved, subject to final approval by the Authority before certification of the tax levy under Minnesota Statutes, Section 275.07. 2. Staff of the Authority are hereby authorized and directed to file the proposed budget with the City in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.033, Subdivision 6. 3. The proposed special benefit levy pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.033, Subdivision 6, is hereby approved in a maximum amount equal to 0.0185 percent of estimated market value in City of St. Louis Park, currently estimated to be $5,872,761,000, with respect to taxes payable in calendar year 2017, subject to final approval by the Authority before certification of the special benefit levy pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 275.07. Economic Development Authority Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 7a) Page 3 Title: 2017 Preliminary HRA Levy Certification and Budget Adoption 4. Staff of the Authority are hereby authorized and directed to seek the approval by resolution of the City Council of the levy of special benefit taxes payable in 2017 and to take such other actions as are necessary to bring before the Board the final budget and levy to be sent to the county auditor on or before five working days after December 20, 2016. Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the Economic Development Authority September 6, 2016 Thomas K. Harmening, Executive Director Anne Mavity, President Attest: Melissa Kennedy, Secretary Economic Development Authority Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 7a) Page 4 Title: 2017 Preliminary HRA Levy Certification and Budget Adoption HRA Levy 2017 Preliminary Budget September 6, 2016 2015 2016 2017 Actual Revised Budget Proposed Budget Revenues: Property Tax Levy 930,539$ 1,011,208$ 1,086,461$ Interest Income 6,910 - - Total Revenue 937,449$ 1,011,208$ 1,086,461$ Expenditures: Services and Other Charges 15,830$ 16,041$ 15,000$ Transfer Out to Development Fund - 1,936,527 1,071,461 Total Expenditures 15,830$ 1,952,568$ 1,086,461$ Beginning Cash Balance 19,741$ 941,360$ -$ Net Change 921,619$ (941,360)$ -$ Ending Cash Balance 941,360$ -$ -$ Loan balance 4,606,721$ 2,670,194$ 1,598,733$ Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: September 6, 2016 Presentation: 2a EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Best Friends Day / Twin Cities Strut Your Mutt Proclamation RECOMMENDED ACTION: The Mayor is asked to read the attached Proclamation recognizing Animal Society’s Best Friends Day and the Twin Cities Strut Your Mutt Event being held at Wolfe Park on September 11, 2016. Meg McCormick (St. Louis Park Resident) and additional members of the Twin Cities Strut Your Mutt Volunteer Event Committee will be in attendance to accept the award. POLICY CONSIDERATION: None at this time. SUMMARY: The City of St. Louis Park appreciates the efforts of Best Friends Animal Society and its commitment to Save Them All. St. Louis Park is a dog-friendly community that is happy to welcome the Best Friends’ Twin Cities Strut Your Mutt event to Wolfe Park on September 11, 2016. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged community. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Proclamation Prepared by: Debbie Fischer, Administrative Services Office Assistant Approved by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 2a) Page 2 Title: Best Friends Day / Twin Cities Strut Your Mutt Proclamation PROCLAMATION Best Friends Day WHEREAS, millions of pets end up in shelters each year due to divorce, breakup, foreclosure, death in the family, economic problems, lack of proper ID, minor behavioral problems; and WHEREAS, every day, more than 9,000 healthy and adoptable dogs and cats are killed in America's shelters; and WHEREAS, an estimated 90 percent of the animals that enter shelters are adoptable, or could be with care and treatment; and WHEREAS, spaying and neutering five pets of low-income residents per 1000 residents would equal a reduction in shelter intake of 30% in five years; and WHEREAS, fostering adds to rescue efforts and socializes pets, making them more adoptable, with adoption getting animals out of shelters and into homes; and WHEREAS, Best Friends Animal Society is a national animal welfare organization focused on ending the killing of dogs and cats in America’s shelters; and WHEREAS, Best Friends Animal Society offers refuge to animals, provides national outreach programs, partners with local animal rescue organizations, and cares for approximately 1,700 animals daily at their sanctuary; and WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park recognizes the efforts of Best Friends Animal Society and its commitment to Save Them All; and WHEREAS, St. Louis Park is a dog-friendly community that is happy to welcome the Best Friends’ Twin Cities Strut Your Mutt event to Wolfe Park; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota do hereby proclaim September 11, 2016 as Best Friends Day and call upon citizens in our community to participate in the Twin Cities Strut Your Mutt event. WHEREFORE, I set my hand and cause the Great Seal of the City of St. Louis Park to be affixed this 6th Day of September, 2016. ________________________________ Jake Spano, Mayor Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: September 6, 2016 Presentation: 2b EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Retirement Recognition Resolution for Police Officer Terry Reuvers RECOMMENDED ACTION: Read resolution and present plaque to Terry Reuvers for 30 years of service to the City of St. Louis Park. POLICY CONSIDERATION: None at this time. SUMMARY: City policy states that employees who retire or resign in good standing with over 20 years of service will be presented with a resolution from the Mayor, City Manager and City Council. Police Officer Terry Reuvers (last name pronounced “REE-verz”) will be in attendance for the presentation at the beginning of the meeting. The Mayor is asked to read the resolution and present Terry with a plaque in recognition of his years of service to the City. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution Prepared by: Ali Timpone, HR Coordinator Approved by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 2b) Page 2 Title: Retirement Recognition Resolution for Police Officer Terry Reuvers RESOLUTION NO. 16-___ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA, RECOGNIZING THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF AND EXPRESSING APPRECIATION TO POLICE OFFICER TERRY REUVERS WHEREAS, Terry Reuvers began his employment with the City of St. Louis Park over 30 years ago on April 28, 1986; and WHEREAS, Terry has served in the positions of Patrol Officer, Field Training Officer, School Liaison Officer, Drug Task Force Officer, and SWAT Officer; and WHEREAS, Terry has furthered his personal growth and education by recently receiving a Master’s Degree in Kinesiology; and WHEREAS, Terry has future plans to assist the policing profession by participating in an upcoming cardiovascular health study for police officers; and WHEREAS, Terry will continue in retirement to follow his passion for physical fitness through coaching and teaching and will continue to remain active in competitive triathlon events as well as enjoy the love of outdoors, fishing and camping with his family; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, by this resolution and public record, would like to thank Terry Reuvers for his great contributions and 30 years of dedicated service to the City of St. Louis Park and wish him the best in his retirement. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council September 6, 2016 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: September 6, 2016 Minutes: 3a UNOFFICIAL MINUTES CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA JULY 25, 2016 The meeting convened at 6:32 p.m. Councilmembers present: Mayor Jake Spano, Tim Brausen, Steve Hallfin, Gregg Lindberg, Anne Mavity, Thom Miller, and Susan Sanger. Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), Deputy City Manager/Human Resources Director (Ms. Deno), Engineering Director (Ms. Heiser), Community Development Director (Mr. Locke), Principal Planner (Ms. McMonigal), Public Works Superintendent (Mr. Hanson), Operations and Recreation Director (Ms. Walsh), Communications and Marketing Manager (Ms. Larson), Public Works Services Manager (Mr. Merkley), Solid Waste Program Coordinator (Ms. Fischer), Solid Waste Program Specialist (Ms. Barker), Administrative Intern (Ms. Adade) and Recording Secretary (Ms. Pappas). Guest: David Buerle, Heather Branigin, Future IQ Partners 1. Future Study Session Agenda Planning – August 8 & 22, 2016 Mr. Harmening presented the proposed Study Session agenda for August 8 and 22, 2016. He noted that tonight’s meeting will consist of a presentation from the first of two consultants regarding the city’s visioning process. The second consultant will present on August 1, 2016. The Bridgewater item is tentative for the August 8 meeting. There will be a possible add-on of a meeting with representatives from Metro Transit regarding changes they are considering to Route 9, the West End, Cedar Lake Road, and Cedar Trails area. If added, they will present these proposed changes to the council prior to the community meeting in early to mid-September. Councilmember Sanger asked when the council will discuss the question regarding sidewalks and expenses related to this. Mr. Harmening said this is planned for the August 15 meeting, with a possible study session before or after. Councilmember Mavity asked that the discussion related to the Pledge of Allegiance on August 8 be taken off the agenda for now. Mayor the Spano noted an email received from the Lutheran Church, asking for time at a Study Session to discuss zoning of their property 2. Consulting Services for Vision/Comprehensive Plan David Buerle and Heather Branigin from Future IQ Partners, prospective consultants for the Vision/Comprehensive Plan, were present to meet with the council to discuss their approach for undertaking the community visioning process for St. Louis Park. Ms. McMonigal stated this is the first of two presentations to the council. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 3a) Page 2 Title: Study Session Minutes of July 25, 2016 Mr. Buerle, the Founder and CEO of Future IQ Partners, led the presentation and discussion. He gave a brief overview on the company, its background, and projects they have been involved in, including work on the Edina visioning process. He noted the firm has an international presence, and has been involved in projects in Australia, Europe and North America. Mr. Buerle stated he is aware the council has objectives about going deep and wide in this process. He stated he would be the lead on this project and introduced his staff, including Ms. Branigin, who would also be involved in the project. Mr. Buerle presented samples of his work with Edina of the Future, the Department of Defense, Mediterranean Sea Ports Project, St. George’s House, Small Business Strategy of Alberta, and Griffith Foods. Mr. Buerle is from Australia, but resides in Ireland and works from a virtual office with no headquarters. Mr. Buerle discussed his methods as being educational and transformative, with deep and wide engagement. He stated that the vision and process will be smart, deep thinking and strategic, with implications for 2040. He stated that the process will work to reach the whole of the community of St. Louis Park. Mr. Buerle added that he uses data-driven analysis and will offer an intense platform that will apply network science and logic to reach people across the community. The work will be customized and personalized to St. Louis Park, targeting 1000-1500 high quality citizen surveys, conducted at 2-hour workshops. An additional 1500-2500 lower intensity citizen surveys will also be conducted, with a goal of reaching 2500-5000 individuals. He added his work involved scenario-based planning and the development of a long-term vision and strategy, informed by internal and external trends and environment, and building plausible futures and alignment on a 20-25-year vision. There will be a structured stratification approach, with think tank sessions; open public sessions; neighborhood association meeting sessions; interest groups; and sector organizations. Additionally, city staff, council, boards, commissions, cultural groups and networks will participate in sessions. Mr. Buerle stated that the timeline will be to start the process in August/September 2016, with broad community engagement through February 2017, incorporating the visioning into the comprehensive plan process. He added that this work helps look at emergent trends, not fads, and helps to see what a city of the future might look like, including trends around infrastructure, environment and sustainability, and what implications there may be for St. Louis Park. Mr. Buerle stated ultimately the goal will be to reach a point of consensus on where the community wants St. Louis Park to be in 20 years. He added this information can also be filtered by age, gender and years living in the city. Mr. Buerle stated the data that is collected will not only help with the visioning and the comprehensive plan, but also on other issues the city faces over time. He noted the data will help produce a strategic vision and framework, with actions and recommendations. Mr. Buerle stated the discussion will focus on expectations, the very key role of council members in this process, points of involvement, and data review. Councilmember Miller stated this process will be key to developing better equity within St. Louis Park, adding it will be important to involve minority and ethnic populations in the process, and get folks to be involved who are not normally represented. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 3a) Page 3 Title: Study Session Minutes of July 25, 2016 Mr. Buerle stated looking at how people are connected is the best way to reach all folks. He added it will be important to look at patterns and ask who certain people know, where are they, and how do we reach them. He added that building relationships will assist in the end result being more powerful. The role of the council will be to help guide this connection process and help identify these people. Mr. Harmening mentioned an example of a key contact would be members of the city’s multi- cultural advisory group. Mayor Spano added that engaging youth will also be important, as the city’s youth will live this future vision. Mr. Buerle stated it will be important for his firm to have access to the city’s schools, also, and to be able to partner with the social studies and government classes, in order to work with students. He added it will be important to have people who represent all groups within the city. Councilmember Mavity liked the data driven approach presented, but added she has questions around engaging with various cultural groups. She asked if Mr. Buerle could address how to engage people of color in this process and work through language barriers in the process. Mr. Buerle noted there are 50-60 different languages spoken in St. Louis Park, adding their firm has worked with many groups using translators. He added it will be important to build this plan early on and then come back to the council to ask if there are any holes in the groups of people being approached. Councilmember Mavity asked how this firm is engaging beyond the typical voices and the regular neighborhood groups, and also how they use social media and other technology to engage people. How has this changed over the years? Mr. Buerle stated they do online surveys towards the end of the process but hold discussions the first three months, so there is context before the survey is provided. These study groups help provide more engagement at the beginning of the process. He added that using the latest technology allows for data sets at granular levels, organizational levels, and cultural group levels. Councilmember Sanger added it has been difficult getting engagement from some groups, stating if people are told they have to sit through a long presentation, it will skew who shows up to the meetings in the first place. Mr. Buerle assured Councilmember Sanger the presentations are engaging and formatted as discussions, not lectures. Councilmember Sanger asked where in the process the council would identify the critical questions they want people to answer in this process. For example, she noted questions such as, “What can we do to best attract and retain families in this city?” and “What are the major goals we want to address?” She asked Mr. Buerle where this fits into their process. Mr. Buerle stated this begins in the think tank process, at the first part of the workshop. He added this also happens after prior research is completed. Then scenario development begins, and they can develop plausible scenarios, where they can actually see these things happening along with the implications of the scenarios. Councilmember Sanger stated that much of this is theoretical, and she does not understand where the process begins. She asked if and how the council shapes what gets addressed in the workshops. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 3a) Page 4 Title: Study Session Minutes of July 25, 2016 Mr. Bruele stated this occurs in the scenario development stage, where all of the discussion happens related to hot button issues and key topics that need to be discussed in the community. Councilmember Brausen added these groups need to include a wide variety of racial groups and communities of color, and the process needs to be racially inclusive. Councilmember Lindberg added it will be a big miss in any process the city undertakes if it is not strategic in partnership with the schools to provide access around culture and race equity. He noted that however this fits together will be very important. Councilmember Mavity pointed out access to families will also be important. She asked what Mr. Buerle’ s firm would consider success in terms of outreach and responses in St. Louis Park, and getting a community vision from groups that are not always reached. Mr. Buerle stated one such indicator would be the total number of responses. He added that St. Louis Park is double the size of Edina and noted his firm has identified where they succeeded and did not succeed in Edina. He stated that learning from this project, communication in St. Louis Park will be very important at the outset, as will creating engagement and a powerful context. That is why the two-hour sessions will be very important. Councilmember Mavity stressed the importance of going to these groups that are not engaged, and reaching out to them, rather than only holding meetings and public hearings. Mr. Buerle pointed out that in Edina, they did meetings in people’s homes. Councilmember Miller agreed the focus groups will need to be representative of the community, but added he has faith in staff and the consultant to handle this process and to make it the best it can be. Ms. McMonigal stated staff is also researching the best ways to reach all groups in the community. After Mr. Buerle and Ms. Branigin left the meeting, Mayor Spano asked about the price of this consultant firm. Mr. Harmening stated staff did not provide the costs, so the council could focus on the presentation. Councilmember Lindberg stated this proposal had strength in the data approach and was robust around the community engagement process. He added the more we can do around community engagement, the better. Councilmember Sanger added she liked the scenario approach; however, she did not understand how to begin. She stated the council will need to have a discussion about what needs to be accomplished during this process and what the outcomes should be. She added the council will need to take a step back and help shape the process, and they have not figured it out as yet. Mayor Spano stated Mr. Buerle asked if the council wants to influence this process. Councilmember Lindberg stated he wants to be cautious about how much framing the council does, and wants to ask the community for their input on this process. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 3a) Page 5 Title: Study Session Minutes of July 25, 2016 Mr. Harmening stated this firm is a futurist firm, and the next one that will present is also a futurist firm. He added they will help the council and staff understand where we are as a community and what the future holds. Ms. McMonigal added staff will also look at the past visioning process and past comprehensive plans as a starting point. She noted St. Louis Park has a strong background to aid in this process and a good starting point to come back to the council with. Mayor Spano added he spoke with the Mayor of Edina about their experience and stated he would share that information with any councilmember who was interested. The second consultant firm will present at the August 1 City Council meeting. 3. Advancing Racial Equity: Moving Forward Together as a City Ms. Deno introduced and welcomed Jane Adade, a student intern from Ghana, who is working with the city this summer. Ms. Adade is studying at Mankato State. Ms. Deno presented a video showing a conference recently held in Woodbury, MN, where local government officials and staff discussed racial equity and diversity issues at a workshop and training sessions. Ms. Deno explained beginning in 2016 a team from St. Louis Park began a year-long participation in the Advancing Racial Equity and Transforming Government Program with the Center for Social Inclusion (CSI) and the League of Minnesota Cities (LMC). This program helps develop understanding and awareness of racial equity; explores roles, challenges, responsibilities and opportunities for advancement in the metro area; and facilitates the development and use of racial equity tools; and creates partnerships region-wide. Mr. Harmening stated that in some cities, city managers and human resource directors are working with their councils to emphasize the importance of this topic. In St. Louis Park, the council is completely on board and wants to move forward on these initiatives. He added that staff is looking to the council to help develop a racial equity plan and to continue these important conversations. Mayor Spano stated one of the early exercises worked on explored the question of what racial equity means in St. Louis Park. He added this was a challenging exercise. The group worked to include everything in a draft brochure, which was distributed to the council for review. Ms. Adade gave a brief overview specific to St. Louis Park and presented baseline data to see where the city is; where it is going and why; and to measure progress. She presented data related to city businesses; population growth; white vs. non-white population forecasts; how people self- identify; education and the correlation between education level and race; unemployment rates; income, poverty level, and housing statistics. Councilmember Brausen stated this is essential work, especially when discussing the creation of a safe environment in cities for people of all races. He added it is important to discuss these topics in the workplace and to have these intentional, courageous and sometimes uncomfortable conversations. He added that over time, staff and council members will need to change in order to reflect the population of St. Louis Park. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 3a) Page 6 Title: Study Session Minutes of July 25, 2016 Councilmember Sanger stated she also is glad the city is addressing race and equity. She noted that in the last week, two residents had contacted her asking what credibility the city staff had going into discussions on racial diversity. Ms. Deno stated it is good to start these conversations and be open about these issues in order to build awareness. She added it will be helpful for residents to know what the city is doing in order to try to change processes. She added staff does not presume to know all the answers. Mr. Harmening added the credibility question noted by Councilmember Sanger reinforces the need for staff and the council to take this topic on, adding nothing will ever change if we do not begin to have these conversations. Councilmember Lindberg added it is ok to have these conversations and to admit we don’t know everything. He added our culture can be changed, but the worst thing we could do is to focus on hiring goals only and not to create a culture that can change and thrive. He asked what staff needs from the council and what council can do to support this initiative. Mayor Spano added changes in the city’s hiring practices won’t happen overnight, but added that hiring is only a portion of this. It is about service delivery and folks having a better voice in that discussion. At this point, we are just trying to get the discussion started. Councilmember Mavity noted that while there is a staff issue here, in some ways this is the council’s responsibility, encouraging new people to run for council and get involved on commissions and in neighborhood groups. She added the council needs to play a bigger role in this area. Ms. Deno pointed out the council clearly understands the goals and that this is a journey. Discussions will continue, and staff is going through an internal awareness process, noting there will be more to come on this topic related to the visioning process and the comprehensive plan. Councilmember Lindberg stated this is a good time for the council to have a talk with the Human Rights Commission. Ms. Deno agreed and stated both the Human Rights Commission and the Multicultural Advisory Group would be good to speak with and to gather feedback from. She added this can be done at the staff level or with the council. Mayor Spano noted that two important points came forward at the session with elected officials: Everyone, no matter their race, stated they do not know what to do to fix this situation. The facilitator stated the conversations around race and work need to start but not to focus on the outcome. The point is to start to have these conversations. He added it is important for all of the council members to attend one of these sessions. Councilmember Miller added staff did a great job with the brochure, and he agreed that this has to start somewhere. He applauds staff for digging in on this issue. He added that the council would welcome suggestions from staff on how to dig in on this further, and noted the council and commissions should spend more time on this. Mr. Harmening stated there is an organization of women that works toward having more city officials that are women and asked if anyone is aware of any similar organization for people of color. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 3a) Page 7 Title: Study Session Minutes of July 25, 2016 Councilmember Mavity pointed out the Wellstone Action is intentionally focused on this issue, and has training; however, there is a political bent. 4. Bring Your Own Bag Draft Ordinance Ms. Fisher stated if the council decides to move forward with the ordinance, the next step is to have a public hearing in March, 2017, and an ordinance effective date of July 1, 2018. The process would include addressing more areas that need research and receiving additional council input, along with business and resident notification. Mr. Harmening stated another question related to this issue is if bags from pharmacy retail stores should be included in the ordinance. Mayor Spano asked if there is momentum to continue to pursue this discussion. Councilmember Hallfin stated he read the report, but his mind has not changed on this. He is interested to see what the other council members are thinking. Councilmember Miller agreed, as did Mayor Spano and Councilmember Mavity. Councilmember Mavity stated she was disappointed with the Environmental and Sustainability Commission because in their report they discussed the negative impact of banning plastic bags. She added this seemed like a disconnect. What the council is trying to do is incent reuse and include a 10 cent fee, as many other cities do. She added this is to raise awareness and to encourage reuse of everything. She stated she felt this is a different proposal than last time. Councilmember Sanger stated she had been a firm supporter of the fee but no longer is. She has come to a different understanding. She added she had a conversation with one of the commissioners regarding this issue and doesn’t know if initiating the fee does anything positive for the environment itself. She added she would like to focus on reusing the reusable bags and on litter issues, and to find ways to have more recycling drop off containers. Mayor Spano stated his position has not changed on this. He has met with Environment and Sustainability Coordinator Shannon Pinc and Mr. Harmening on this, adding that the ordinance is actually not of the highest priority now. At this point the priority is the climate action plan. Councilmember Hallfin added he would prefer the use of reminders to residents that say don’t forget to bring your reusable bag. Councilmember Lindberg added he is not interested in talking about a fee and is more interested in the climate action plan. Councilmember Brausen stated he is in favor of the fee, saying it will address the litter problem; deter the use of multiple bags; and help change behavioral patterns. He added that it will be positive by cutting the numbers of bags down, along with the single-use throwaway mentality, while also generating 10 cents for the merchant. Councilmember Miller stated he is interested in the life cycle analysis and in using city resources for this project. He added he has had conversations with residents who use paper bags for collecting recycling and noted he is in favor of fees for plastic bags but not for paper bags. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 3a) Page 8 Title: Study Session Minutes of July 25, 2016 5. Updates on Water Treatment Plant #4 Mr. Hanson stated that at the end of the February 8, 2016, Study Session, staff updated the council on the status of our water capacity vs. projected demand. As a part of that discussion, council was advised of concerns associated with the presence of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in the water at Water Treatment Plant #4. Certain VOCs were approaching the allowable maximum contaminant levels as set by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Since the February discussion, staff has made progress with the various agencies on a plan for making interim improvements to address the situation, while plans are developed and finalized for permanent upgrades to this plant. Mr. Hanson stated this issue is not related to the Reilly site and noted that whether naturally occurring or manmade, it can still be a health concern. He also stated the VOC levels have not had any Department of Health violations, but they are trending toward higher levels. He explained there are two solutions, an interim fix and a permanent upgrade, with the permanent upgrades currently included in the city’s capital improvement program as an unfunded expense. The MPCA is also working to identify potential funding sources for reconstruction. Mr. Hanson explained the treatment process which injects air to help lower the VOC levels. Also, he noted that the carbon treatment filters out the bad PAH levels, which have dropped and now meet consent decree levels. Since the PAH levels are now significantly below advisory levels, the carbon filters are no longer necessary at WTP4. Mr. Hanson stated an additional concern associated with the carbon filters at WTP4 is they appear to be adding to the VOC levels. Councilmember Miller asked why the issue of increasing VOC levels is not occurring at Water Treatment Plant #1. Mr. Hanson said he is not sure why, other than the VOC levels in the raw water at WTP1 are already very low. He added the city is proposing to EPA and MPCA to put additional air injections at Water Treatment Plant #4, as an interim solution. He added that Public Works is still in negotiations on this but was given conditional approval at this point. He added the hope with this plan is to use the carbon vessels to bleed off the additional air injected into the water so additional VOCs are removed before the water exits Water Treatment Plant #4. Councilmember Mavity asked if the VOCs have a fingerprint to indicate they are not coming from the Reilly site. Mr. Hanson stated yes, and this is not the contaminant that resulted from the Reilly site. Councilmember Sanger asked if these VOCs have any relationship to VOC contamination from the past vapor intrusion concerns. Mr. Hanson stated he did not know if they were the same VOCs as in the past, but believed they might be, noting the VOCs want to go toward air. This is why the air treatment works in this situation. Councilmember Sanger asked if there are VOCs elsewhere. Mr. Hanson stated they should not be found elsewhere in our current system. Councilmember Miller asked if the air actually goes somewhere. Mr. Hanson stated the air goes into the water during the treatment process but is removed prior to sending out to the distribution system. The treatment process will capture the air and take it through a filter as needed to remove City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 3a) Page 9 Title: Study Session Minutes of July 25, 2016 contaminants. He reiterated that this is an interim solution. The permanent solution will remove the VOCs using a different technology known as air stripping. Mayor Spano stated public works will continue to test this, and if anything changes, they can go back to the former process. Councilmember Brausen asked the costs associated with the long-term fix. Mr. Hanson stated it is $2.5 to $3 million for the full upgrade. Councilmember Mavity asked what the timeline is for installation. Mr. Hanson stated that the interim solution will be installed by the end of September, but reiterated it is not a permanent fix. Communications/Meeting Check-In (Verbal) The Reilly issue will be discussed on July 27 at 6 p.m. at the Municipal Service Center. Mr. Harmening stated a meeting with Representative Ellison has been set for Friday, August 19 at 8:30 a.m. The council discussed an email received from Eric Hoffer and leaders in the St. Louis Park Lutheran community asking for a meeting regarding the church on Highway 100. Mr. Hoffer asked the council for an opportunity to meet and discuss rezoning of the church site on Vernon Avenue for single-family residential. Councilmember Sanger had addressed this issue in the past with the church leaders, and they had also presented to the council at a study session in March. Councilmember Sanger indicated they said they would get back to her at a later date, but they never did. Mr. Harmening stated there is a formal process they can go through, whereby they submit an application for new zoning and go through the Planning Commission for approvals. Councilmember Sanger indicated she will contact the church leaders, respond to their email, and report back to the council on this issue. The meeting adjourned at 9:45 p.m. Written Reports provided and documented for recording purposes only: 6. June 2016 Monthly Financial Report 7. Second Quarter Investment Report (April – June 2016) 8. Central Park West & 4800 Excelsior Public Art Update 9. Utility Box Wrap Neighborhood Program 10. Update on City Hall Lobby Art Display 11. Bicycle Friendly Community Application ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Jake Spano, Mayor Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: September 6, 2016 Minutes: 3b UNOFFICIAL MINUTES CITY COUNCIL MEETING ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA AUGUST 1, 2016 1. Call to Order Mayor Spano called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. Councilmembers present: Mayor Jake Spano, Tim Brausen, Steve Hallfin, Gregg Lindberg, Anne Mavity, Thom Miller, and Susan Sanger. Councilmembers absent: None. Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), City Attorney (Mr. Mattick), Planning/Zoning Supervisor (Ms. McMonigal), Communications Specialist (Ms. Pribbenow), and Recording Secretary (Ms. Pappas). 1a. Pledge of Allegiance 1b. Roll Call 2. Presentations - None 3. Approval of Minutes 3a. City Council Study Session Minutes June 27, 2016 It was moved by Councilmember Brausen, seconded by Councilmember Mavity, to approve the June 27, 2016 City Council Study Session Meeting Minutes as presented. The motion passed 7-0. 3b. City Council Study Session Minutes July 11, 2016 It was moved by Councilmember Miller, seconded by Councilmember Sanger, to approve the July 11, 2016 City Council Study Session Meeting Minutes as presented. The motion passed 7-0. 4. Approval of Agenda and Items on Consent Calendar 4a. Accept for filing City Disbursement Claims for the period of July 9 through July 22, 2016. 4b. Approve entering in to a two-year lease agreement between the City and Meadowbrook Manor apartment complex relating to allowing public park equipment and activities within the Meadowbrook Manor apartment complex. The current lease expires on August 31, 2016. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 3b) Page 2 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of August 1, 2016 4c. Approve Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance No. 2496-16 amending Division 10. Floodplain Districts Section 36-292(f) of the City Code to allow compensatory flood storage be provided using accepted engineering practices to achieve the goal of eliminating any increase in flood stage as a result of a project, and authorize publication of summary ordinance. 4d. Approve a Temporary On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for Church of the Holy Family at 5900 West Lake Street for their event to be held September 10, 2016. 4e. Adopt Resolution No. 16-090 authorizing the installation of stop signs on 29th Street at Blackstone Avenue. 4f. Adopt Resolution No. 16-091 authorizing the installation of stop signs on Alabama Avenue at 34th Street. 4g. Adopt Resolution No. 16-092 accepting work and authorizing final payment in the amount of $30,022.06 for Project 2013-1000 Pavement Management Project (Area 2) with Valley Paving, Inc., Contract No. 48-14. 4h. Adopt Resolution No. 16-093 accepting donations to the Fire Department. 4i. Approve for filing Environment & Sustainability Commission Meeting Minutes of March 2, 2016 4j. Approve for filing Environment & Sustainability Commission Meeting Minutes of April 6, 2016 4k. Approve for filing Environment & Sustainability Commission Meeting Minutes of May 4, 2016 4l. Approve for filing Environment & Sustainability Commission Meeting Minutes of June 1, 2016 4m. Approve for filing Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of June 15, 2016 It was moved by Councilmember Lindberg, seconded by Councilmember Brausen, to approve the Agenda as presented and the Consent Calendar; and to waive reading of all resolutions and ordinances. The motion passed 7-0. 5. Boards and Commissions – None 6. Public Hearings – None 7. Requests, Petitions, and Communications from the Public – None 8. Resolutions, Ordinances, Motions and Discussion Items 8a. 1st Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Related to Temporary Health Care Dwellings Mr. Harmening and Mr. Walther provided background information. On May 12, 2016, Governor Dayton signed into law the creation and regulation of temporary family health care dwellings. The law defines Temporary Health Care dwellings, establishes regulations for them, and requires municipalities to permit them in accordance with the regulations established by the statute. The same statute also gives cities the option to opt-out of the statute, without needing to provide a reason for opting out or providing an alternative or similar option. It simply has to pass an ordinance stating that the city is opting out. On July 20, 2016, the Planning Commission held a public hearing for the proposed zoning City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 3b) Page 3 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of August 1, 2016 ordinance amendment. No one was present to speak, and the Planning Commission recommended approval of the ordinance to opt-out of the statute on a 5-0 vote. Councilmember Sanger stated that in addition to being in conflict with the zoning laws of the city and the building code requirements, the statute is not practical. Councilmember Mavity stated she supports opting out. She added the intention of this statute is that not everyone’s home is suited to have a mother-in-law suite to accommodate the care of family members in an affordable or accessible way. While the statute is not appropriate in St. Louis Park at this time, it is a creative option for the future and a good idea. It was moved by Councilmember Sanger, seconded by Councilmember Hallfin, to approve the first reading of an Ordinance amending the zoning ordinance to opt-out of Minnesota Statutes Section 462.3593 which defines and regulates Temporary Family Health Care Dwellings, and to set the second reading for August 15, 2016. The motion passed 7-0. 8b. Assessment Policy. Resolution No. 16-094. Ms. Heiser referred the council to the final draft of the assessment policy that staff has been working on since November, 2015. It was last updated in 2000, and changes and updates have been discussed over the last few months at several study sessions. Since the last update in 2000, council direction, improvement costs, and infrastructure needs have changed in a number of the areas covered by this policy. Additionally, public improvements not included in this policy and will be paid using franchise fees, municipal state aid, general obligation bonds, and utility funds. Mr. Harmening thanked the council and Ms. Heiser for work done on this policy, and added that staff is ready to keep moving forward. Councilmember Brausen thanked staff and stated he is confident the policy will spread the burden of street, alley, and infrastructure improvements throughout the community. He added the cost to construct parking lots will still be assessed to business land owners, who are the primary beneficiary of the improvement. However, in the vast majority of cases, all citizens will benefit from the improvements provided to public transportation and municipal infrastructure, and all should share in these costs. Councilmember Brausen stated he does want to specifically note there have been some questions as far as public benefit to city residents in improving the less than six miles of alleyways in St. Louis Park; however, there is a distinct public benefit. Improving the alleyways will make it easier for the city to plow, which will save money, and will provide access for emergency equipment. The costs will be spread over 10 years and will be paid from franchise fees. He added everyone is benefitting, and everyone will share in these costs. He stated he will support this policy. Councilmember Lindberg also thanked staff, noting the city is now in a good place. He added the discussions on unimproved alleys, as well as infrastructure improvements and use of franchise fees for improvements, has been beneficial. He stated this will make it easier to budget for improvements vs. imposing large special assessments, and will provide City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 3b) Page 4 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of August 1, 2016 a good way to move forward on projects. Councilmember Lindberg stated he is looking forward to seeing these improvements. Councilmember Sanger agreed with the comments of Councilmembers Brausen and Lindberg. Additionally, she noted in her tenure on the council, she has repeatedly been asked by residents that the city not nickel and dime the public with fees, and that the fees for any projects that benefit the general public should be built into property taxes, noting this policy meets that goal. Now the public will pay for street and alleyway improvements on a shared basis, and this is important. She added it was unfair to put costs on property owners who are adjacent to where infrastructure improvements are needed because they are not necessarily users of that infrastructure. This is a good step in the right direction. Councilmember Sanger stated there are still some unimproved alleys in the Sorenson Neighborhood, so she is glad to now have a plan in place to bring them up to meet standards. Councilmember Hallfin stated he is very happy and proud to be on the council when items such as this come forward and are passed. He added he has had questions from the public as to why he likes being a council member, and approving this policy is one of the reasons. He stated this is one of the proudest things the council has completed, and he is looking forward to its implementation. Mayor Spano agreed and stated the large bill a resident had to pay in the past for a break in their water service was unfair. This policy is the result of the discussion of fairness in the city’s infrastructure; helps make funding more predictable from an operational standpoint; and addresses the fairness and equity standpoint. It was moved by Councilmember Brausen, seconded by Councilmember Lindberg, to waive the reading and adopt Resolution No. 16-094, rescinding Resolution 00-078 and approving updated City Assessment Policy. The motion passed 7-0. 9. Communications Mayor Spano noted that National Night Out is Tuesday, Aug. 2 and is an opportunity for neighborhoods to gather together. He added there are 140 known parties that will occur in the city on Tuesday evening. Councilmember Brausen added that not every neighborhood party is organized with the city, so residents should check with their neighbors. Also, if any of the parties are interested in having a visitor from the city, local authorities, fire trucks, or city trucks, they can contact the city offices to organize a visit. He commended staff for their work on this. Councilmember Lindberg invited Ward 3 to attend a conversation he is conducting on Wednesday, August 3, at 6 p.m., at the Oak Hill Park shelter. Councilmember Mavity asked to wish her son Henry a Happy 21st Birthday. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 3b) Page 5 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of August 1, 2016 Mayor Spano stated he will have his next open house on August 13 at 9 a.m. and invited the public to visit with him while walking around Bass Lake. He noted folks can meet him just north of the Melrose parking lot to walk and chat. Mayor Spano added that last month the League of Minnesota Cities chose members of distinction from the state legislature, and Senator Latz and Representative Youakim, both representing St. Louis Park, were chosen for this distinction. He congratulated them both for being recognized. 10. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 7:55 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Jake Spano, Mayor Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: September 6, 2016 Minutes: 3c UNOFFICIAL MINUTES CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA AUGUST 8, 2016 The meeting convened at 6:30 p.m. Councilmembers present: Mayor Jake Spano, Tim Brausen, Steve Hallfin, Gregg Lindberg, Anne Mavity, and Susan Sanger. Councilmembers absent: Thom Miller. Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), Engineering Director (Ms. Heiser), Assistant Zoning Administrator (Mr. Morrison), Chief Information Officer, (Mr. Pires), Communications and Marketing Officer (Ms. Larson), and Recording Secretary (Ms. Pappas). Guests: Steve Mahowald and C. Terrence Anderson, Metro Transit. 1. Future Study Session Agenda Planning –Month August 15 & 22, 2016 Mr. Harmening presented the proposed Study Session agenda for August 15 and 22, 2016. He noted there will be a special study session on Monday, August 15, to discuss the 2017 budget. On August 22, there will be a study session to review the Environmental and Sustainability Commission and Youth Advisory topic. The Youth Center Building will be discussed at a later date, when all council members are present. 2. West End and Route 9 Transit Study Concept Plan Mr. Mahowald and Mr. Anderson presented the concept plan which focused on changing travel patterns in parts of north Minneapolis, Golden Valley, St. Louis Park, and Minnetonka. Based on the results of this study, Metro Transit proposes modifications to the transit network to address this new demand. Mr. Mahowald added this is only a concept plan at this time, and public input will be needed before the final plan is developed and implemented. Mr. Mahowald explained that the goals of the study included simplifying the route structure; providing better connectivity between the West End and downtown Minneapolis; improving the performance and productivity of service in the study area; and ensuring that under-represented communities that rely on transit share in the benefits of service improvements. Mr. Mahowald presented a summary and maps describing the study, proposed route, and service changes. He noted there will be an official public comment period in September, 2016, to allow riders and other stakeholders the opportunity to provide feedback. Community meetings will be held by Metro Transit on September 8 and 10. Information will also be available online, and Metro Transit staff will board buses to notify customers and reach out to other community-based organizations to help spread the word about proposed changes. The public will be invited to submit comments via phone, fax, email, and the Metropolitan Council website. Mr. Mahowald noted areas in Glenwood, Cedar Lake Road, and Park Place with low ridership. He stated Metro Transit proposes to eliminate the 649 express route and replace it with a better route. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 3c) Page 2 Title: Study Session Minutes of August 8, 2016 Currently there are only 25 riders on this route. Additionally, the Wayzata Boulevard and Zarthan Avenue routes will be adjusted in order to grow ridership and better serve the West End. Councilmember Brausen stated he has recently heard that residents would like more bus shelters at the routes along Cedar Lake Road and Louisiana Avenue. He asked if there are any plans to link light rail stations with bus routes. Mr. Mahowald stated Metro Transit has developed concepts for this, and if funding is provided, this will come up for public review. Mr. Mahowald noted there is much excitement around the increase in routes at West End, especially with all of the density and pedestrian use at that location. Councilmember Sanger stated she represents the Lake Forest and Fern Hill neighborhoods. She noted these areas will be out of service if this Metro Transit plan is implemented, adding she does not think this is a good idea. She stated her constituents have cars, but are very environmentally conscious and want to ride the bus. She said this is not a good idea for St. Louis Park, and it is more beneficial for persons living downtown, who travel to the West End to shop. Mr. Mahowald stated Metro Transit does not want to eliminate routes, but added that they have limited resources. While he acknowledged the folks in these neighborhoods may have purchased their homes there because of bus service in that area, he noted these changes affect only 15 people who typically ride the bus from this area. Metro Transit wants to establish an all-day, 7-days-a-week, express connection between downtown Minneapolis and the West End. West End has 12,000+ jobs, and many of them pay less than $40,000/year, which is a segment Metro Transit should serve. It make sense to provide an 8-minute trip from the West End to downtown Minneapolis and its 129 routes and 4,700 bus trips per weekday coming from/going to all points of compass. Councilmember Sanger reiterated that when we are looking at the losers and winners, St. Louis Park loses in this case. Councilmember Hallfin added if one doesn’t ride the bus often, the routes can be very confusing. Councilmember Brausen said it will be fascinating to see what the public comment is after the Metro Transit public hearings. He added he likes the proposed ridership changes along Highway 394 and understands why Metro Transit is proposing this. Councilmember Sanger pointed out Metro Transit will need to look at alternatives. 3. Public Process and Community Engagement (Continued Discussion) Ms. Larson and Mr. Pires presented an update to the public process and community engagement. Recently, the council provided direction to staff regarding a public participation/community engagement model for city projects, action, and planning. This discussion is a continuation from June 27 and staff is hoping the process implemented meets council’s expectations. Based on results from recent meetings such as Texas Avenue and Connect the Park that piloted the previously discussed public participation process, staff is asking council if these preliminary efforts are acceptable. Additionally, since the June 27 discussion, the engineering department has implemented a pilot public participation program to host initial meetings on bikeways, sidewalk, Connect the Park, and pavement management projects for 2017. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 3c) Page 3 Title: Study Session Minutes of August 8, 2016 Councilmember Lindberg stated there was a great turnout at the Texas Avenue meeting. He noted there were many comments and he did see great progress since the discussion on sidewalks last year. He liked the fact that more and different groups of people were in attendance and also liked the consistent framework used by staff in the process. Mayor Spano added although he does not get as much feedback as ward members, he did not receive any negative comments. Councilmember Brausen noted about 15 people showed up at the bike meeting, after 1500 letters were sent out. He added that he did hear positive comments about the helpful signs along Texas Avenue, related to the meeting. He agreed with Councilmember Lindberg that staff did a good job on that. Councilmember Lindberg added he also received feedback about the signs related to the Texas Avenue meeting, noting there were between 80-100 people in attendance there. Mr. Harmening asked the council members about when staff schedules meetings such as the Texas Avenue and bike meetings, and if staff should schedule in order to make certain council members are in attendance. Councilmember Sanger stated yes, she does want to be contacted for these important meetings, so she can attend. She added if the location changes, she would like staff to notify her. Councilmember Mavity stated she does have a busy schedule; however, it is always appreciated when staff notifies her about meetings and, depending on her schedule, she will try to be there as often as possible and especially when needed. Councilmember Lindberg added he does not want his schedule to stand in the way of a good public process and he make a valiant effort to be at ward meetings, as he feels a responsibility to be there. Councilmember Brausen stated he appreciates staff checking with him before the meeting date is set, and if he can’t be there, it’s typically fine, but if it’s an important topic, he will be there. Councilmember Hallfin noted to the other councilmembers, that if they cannot attend a meeting, please notify him and he and/or Councilmember Miller will always make every effort to step in. Mayor Spano added he too would step forward in place of council members who cannot attend a meeting. He asked staff and the council members to please let him know the dates of the meetings as well. Mr. Harmening added that when meeting dates are provided, staff prefers to hear back by a certain date from the councilmembers if they are able to attend or not. Then the meeting date can be established. Ms. Heiser discussed the Texas Avenue meeting and noted that approximately 80-100 people were in attendance. She stated the room was small and they could have held it in a bigger facility. She added that going forward, staff will have a facilitator at these meetings, along with staff members. She added that feedback and involvement is part of this process and feedback on design is encouraged; however, scope is not discussed at these meetings. She added staff will continue to work on messaging this to the public. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 3c) Page 4 Title: Study Session Minutes of August 8, 2016 Councilmember Brausen stated it would be helpful to have a general agenda prior to the meeting, in case he was to arrive late at a meeting. Councilmember Lindberg agreed and added some expectations he had related to meetings. He noted it would be helpful to have information in advance, especially on items where residents will be providing feedback, to allow him to best frame responses at the meeting. Councilmember Sanger stated she appreciates the staff report, but thought it was incomplete. She stated staff needs to provide current information and updates as they become available. She added there are other approaches that can be used in the public process, and it sounds like the signs on the roadways are a good example. Councilmember Sanger noted part of this public process is on the council’s shoulders, and not just staff. She added in the past, the council has presented comments that are confusing or conflicting, and this needs to be addressed. She noted that it is helpful to staff when public meetings are structured so groups are subdivided into smaller groups. However, sometimes the small groups don’t hear what their neighbors are saying and they want to see if others have the same viewpoint. She added we need to be careful about how we structure our meetings. Mr. Harmening commented there are dozens of ways to do meetings and staff has done training on how to do these types of meetings. He added one of the reasons the city has open houses or small groups is that not everyone is willing to speak in front of 80 people, especially if a conflicting topic is being discussed. That is the reason for doing small groups and then having report outs. Bigger groups can be negative and people can get intimidated. In order to get input from all, and not just from the loudest people, meetings need to be structured. Councilmember Sanger stated these are not the only ways of doing meeting, and some folks just want to say something one time. This can be a helpful way in having others hear and learn from each other. Mayor Spano added he’s been to meetings where some people won’t speak and one person speaks for the whole group, so he agrees that smaller groups help more people to give input. He added it’s an intimidating process. He stated we also need to ask what the role is of the council members at meetings, and it is important for the council to be careful and mindful of the input they provide. Councilmember Mavity stated when looking at the public engagement process, staff and council do a great job, but we need to use the tools that are available. She noted we need to make sure to use technology to reach the young families in Browndale and Minnekahda Vista, who have good opinions and moved to St. Louis Park for a reason. She added we are not getting representation in a balanced way and there are so many amazing ways technology can be used to get input. She stated she feels staff and council should be doing more of this. Councilmember Lindberg stated he views his role as a councilmember as a listening role. He added some people, from his perspective, can get out of hand, adding we don’t want to see this happen or see people turning negative against staff. That is why a structured meeting is the best process. Councilmember Hallfin added the city does a good job of managing the public process and at a high level. He noted staff reaches out to all citizens, but if some people are not getting information, then citizens need to do some of the work of getting the information. He stated sometimes he hears from a resident after a meeting that it’s a done deal so the meeting didn’t even matter. He said he City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 3c) Page 5 Title: Study Session Minutes of August 8, 2016 tells residents that’s not the case and that council is still discussing the issues with the neighborhood, or the developer, and it won’t be finalized until there is a vote. He stated this needs to be clarified by staff at the meetings. Councilmember Sanger added this is a perfect example of it being the council’s responsibility to be clear with no confusion or mixed messages. She added the council and staff need to do a better job of this. She added when a person gets disruptive or unruly at a meeting, staff should not take the role of police officer, and it should be a councilmember who takes over and keeps the person in line. Councilmember Lindberg agreed and stated it is the council’s responsibility to do this; however, it is also the council’s responsibility to structure the meetings in the best way possible. Councilmember Mavity added staff has to have a plan. Mayor Spano added the facilitator will be helpful in these types of situations. Mr. Harmening stated staff will need to do a better job to ensure the meeting and conversation is framed correctly before going out into the community. Councilmember Lindberg agreed and noted he has a responsibility to the people he represents to be clear and have the “why and if” conversations. He added if he is unclear in some areas, or things were decided before he was on the council, it can make these conversations difficult. Councilmember Mavity agreed and stated the most painful times for her on the council have been when there is lack of clarity. Mr. Harmening stated that staff will always be developing more tools to assist with this process. He noted that it is his hope to see a community engagement manual developed in the near future. This manual would be useful, especially for new staff. Councilmember Mavity asked about the engagement process, stating she still hasn’t seen anything in the spectrum about engagement and innovative ideas. Ms. Heiser stated staff is working on a demo project on bikeways and how they can happen in St. Louis Park. She stated the idea is to engage and get feedback, and it is the first time the city has done this type of engagement process. She stated on September 18, from 1-4 p.m., this demo project will be held and staff will discuss “the how” and how biking can happen in the city. Ms. Heiser stated it was her understanding that when a project is approved by council, it will proceed, but that residents can give their input at meetings about how the project moves forward. Councilmember Sanger questioned what was actually approved several years ago when council approved the Connect the Park! Project. It was her understanding that the council only approved concepts and not that actual segments would be constructed. Ms. Heiser had a different understanding. From this, the council recognized that it is important that staff and council are on the same page in terms of what is actually being approved and what forward action will be taken as a result of the approval, so that residents receive a consistent message. Councilmember Sanger asked staff to distribute handouts about the September 18 event at neighborhood meetings. She added she has had questions about how this will affect parking on the streets. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 3c) Page 6 Title: Study Session Minutes of August 8, 2016 4. Meeting with Congressman Ellison Mr. Harmening asked the council for input on the upcoming meeting with Congressman Ellison. Mr. Harmening along with Councilmembers Brausen, Miller, and Mayor Spano will meet with the Congressman for one hour next week. The following topics were noted: Housing– Ask the Congressman to talk to others about affordable housing in other cities and keep the pressure on others, also. SWLRT and transportation funding in general. Assuming Democrats gain some seats in the election, pursue eliminating Citizens United. How to help advance the environmental cause through federal opportunities. Share issues on Reilly consent agreement and water quality issues in general. Also, note that St. Louis Park is working on a racial equity cohort. Aircraft noise. What we can do to help Congressman Ellison. Councilmember Mavity had a question on Written Report #6 – Building Readiness Ordinance – related to the portion about surveillance camera readiness. She asked if this was really needed, noting everyone has a job to keep their own property safe, and the city should not care how they do it. Mr. Harmening thanked her for the feedback and stated this is for large parking decks and underground parking structures. Councilmember Mavity stated this portion of the ordinance needs more clarity, and she felt it is a bit of an overreach, especially for secure parking areas for residents of a building. Mr. Harmening stated staff will need to be more specific and precise on where this would be required and why. Communications/Meeting Check-In (Verbal) Mr. Harmening noted that there will be some personnel changes coming soon in the police department. Both the Chief and Deputy Chief will be retiring as of September 30, 2016. He informed Council that he is considering using an executive search firm and making the search open to both internal and external candidates. The Council was supportive of using a search firm and an internal and external recruitment process. The council agreed they are content with Mr. Harmening’s handling of the recruitment process and will act as advisors if Mr. Harmening is in need of advice, related to the process. Mr. Harmening will begin the process immediately. Mayor Spano reported that Rachel Harris, Chairperson of the Environment and Sustainability Commission, has resigned her position, effective immediately. Mayor Spano led a discussion about the commission and its work over the last few years. The council noted the commission was developed by the council, and it was formed to advise the council on issues of interest and priority to the council. It was the consensus of the council that the most important work of the commission now will be to help develop and implement a climate action plan. Other areas that the commission would be asked to work on include participating in the upcoming visioning and comp plan process, Green Step Cities, and finishing up the development of a living streets policy. The Council directed that Mr. Harmening work with the commission to modify their work plan in light of the direction above. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 3c) Page 7 Title: Study Session Minutes of August 8, 2016 Councilmember Brausen asked for feedback on National Night Out from the council members. He noted feedback he received included positive comments on sidewalks, infrastructure, and bike lanes. Mayor Spano stated he spent most of the evening at Meadowbrook, noting there were a lot of nice folks there and lots of good energy. He added he heard feedback from four residents who had moved to St. Louis Park from other areas in the metro and that they love the energy and sense of community here in St. Louis Park. They added they loved to walk and had heard great things about the city, prompting them to move here. Councilmember Mavity went to the Excelsior and Grand event, but noted there was bad sound, and it was hard to have a group conversation there. She added she went to seven events, and overall there was great energy and positive comments. She also got questions about the progress of light rail. Councilmember Sanger stated she heard a variety of comments. Some had to do with Twin Lakes and the fact that folks can no longer canoe there. She stated these folks want to put pressure on the DNR and watershed to clean up the lake. She added she was also impressed by how many people were so positive about city police officers. Councilmember Lindberg stated he stayed on his block, and the police officers who came were terrific. He noted there were many positive comments and also comments about the Texa-Tonka and 28th Street bike lanes. Commissioner Brausen thanked staff for their response at all the different locations, especially with the fire engine, police squad car, and log grabber truck visits. Councilmember Hallfin stated he visited an event in Birchwood, and talked with a nice couple who had moved into the neighborhood and remodeled their home. He noted they love the neighborhood and the city. Councilmember Sanger stated she had a question from a resident who was educated and very environmentally aware about the “bad drinking water” in St. Louis Park. She stated she told him the water is safe for drinking but also noted that staff and the council need to do a better job of communicating that our drinking water is safe. The meeting adjourned at 9:30 p.m. Written Reports provided and documented for recording purposes only: 5. Floodplain Ordinance and Floodplain District Map Amendments 6. Building Readiness Ordinance 7. Arlington Row Plat Revision and PUD Amendments 8. Update on Redevelopment contract with Cedar Lake Rd Apartments LLC 9. West End Center Renovations (aka Parkdale Center) ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Jake Spano, Mayor Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: September 6, 2016 Minutes: 3d UNOFFICIAL MINUTES CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL STUDY SESSION ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA AUGUST 15, 2016 The meeting convened at 6:00 p.m. Councilmembers present: Mayor Jake Spano, Tim Brausen, Gregg Lindberg, Anne Mavity, and Susan Sanger. Councilmembers absent: Steve Hallfin and Thom Miller. Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), Director of Operations and Recreation (Ms. Walsh), Director of Engineering (Ms. Heiser), Deputy City Manager/Human Resources Director (Ms. Deno), Director of Community Development (Mr. Locke), City Housing Supervisor (Ms. Schnitker), Fire Chief (Mr. Koering), Deputy Fire Chief (Mr. Wolff), Chief Information Officer (Mr. Pires), Communications and Marketing Manager(Ms. Larson), Inspection Services Manager (Ms. Boettcher), Public Works Superintendent (Mr. Hansen), Chief Financial Officer (Mr. Simon), Police Chief (Mr. Luse), and Recording Secretary (Ms. Pappas). Guest: Citizens group representing sidewalk concerns. 1. 2017 Budget Update Mr. Harmening presented a brief overview of the 2017 budget, which the council had discussed on a high level at the June 20 meeting. Tonight’s discussion will focus on the general fund budget in order to understand the preliminary general property tax and HRA levies, leading up to the final property tax levy, which will be presented in December to the council for final approval. Staff is seeking direction on any other major changes, programs, or policies that should be evaluated during the preparation of the 2017 budget. Additionally, staff will ask the council for direction on utility rates. Mr. Simon explained that based on the preliminary budget for 2017, the levy would need to be increased by 6.5–7% He added that property taxes provide the largest portion of the general fund, and these funds tie into capital improvement plans. Mr. Harmening added that staff is currently doing a comprehensive compensation review, which includes funding for salary adjustments. The council will hear more about this in the coming weeks. He added there is $17,000 set aside in the budget to purchase wind credits from Xcel Energy and asked the council for feedback on whether staff should pursue this. He noted that wind credits cost more than regular electricity, but given the city’s commitment to the environment and moving toward a zero carbon footprint, he thought this would be a good place to start. Ms. Deno noted that the climate action plan would be developed first with a consultant and then a final decision would be made on use of funds based on the finalized plan. Councilmember Mavity asked if the city is in conversations related to solar gardens, as well. Ms. Deno stated it is being looked at for City Hall and the Fire Station. Councilmember Sanger stated the council had discussed solar panels on the roof and also talked about getting rebates for this. Ms. Deno stated this plan is still under consideration. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 3d) Page 2 Title: Special Study Session Minutes of August 15, 2016 Mayor Spano asked about the $22,000 throw phone included in the capital budget request and requested more detail on this phone. Chief Luse stated this phone is used by negotiators and the emergency response team, and the current one is now 23 years old and obsolete. Because it is a critical piece of equipment, a new updated version is needed. Chief Luse added the new phone will last 25 years, but it cannot be leased and must be purchased. Mr. Harmening asked what drives the cost of the throw phone. Chief Luse stated the durability and technology. Mr. Simon stated funds for the purchase of this phone could come from the council reserve in 2016 and will plan to move ahead with it and remove it from 2017 budget. Councilmember Brausen asked about the costs related to the race and equity initiative, noting it is a critically important topic that council has been engaged in, along with staff. Councilmember Brausen asked for the 2016 amount that was spent in this area and what the anticipated cost is for 2017. Ms. Deno stated for 2016, $30,000 is budgeted in the organizational development area of the budget for additional programs and continued training. Mr. Harmening added that given the council’s commitment to this issue, there is funding set aside for continued work and programs in 2017. For 2017 there is contingency set aside for work on race and equity and also outreach. Councilmember Sanger noted there was a proposal for an addition of two fire fighters. She is concerned about paying for this, presuming the city will be getting a grant. She asked if the two fire fighters would remain in the department after the grant is completed. She also asked if the Fire Department is collecting fees to cover the costs related to the Park Nicollet program where fire fighters visit residents. Ms. Deno stated the addition of fire fighters could be phased in over two years if the grant is not received. If the grant is received, staff would start to set aside funding for each of the next two years so these positions could be retained after the grant funding expires. Fire Chief Koering noted the Park Nicollet post discharge visit pilot program has existed for 2.5 years and is not a driver on demand for staffing. He stated the Fire Department has conducted 150 visits in this time frame, but there is no revenue from the program. The department continues to have discussions with Park Nicollet and HealthPartners about healthcare and how to make changes within the community. Chief Koering added that fire prevention programs and code compliance is driving costs. In 2015, more than 1,200 times, they had more than two calls going at once. Councilmember Sanger thanked the Fire Chief for his explanation but added she is not entirely comfortable with this arrangement, especially when noting that a large number of calls are for medical assistance. She asked if the city needs another model for this or possibly needs different medical professionals for these medical calls. Mayor Spano confirmed if fire staff is responding to a home health call and a fire breaks out, the city has mutual aid agreements with other area communities to take care of the fire call. Fire Chief Koering responded this is correct. Councilmember Mavity asked Fire Chief Koering to clarify St. Louis Park’s relationship with other cities and reliability on fire calls. Chief Koering stated if the Fire Department is out on another call, Edina, Golden Valley and Minnetonka provide backup for St. Louis Park, and are very reliable. Councilmember Mavity asked about the housing report and city policies related to changing ownership. She stated the city has worked to be proactive on these policies, but with Meadowbrook changing ownership and this being a private transaction, the city should consider having tools in place for any similar future transactions. She asked if there are any updates on strategies or any City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 3d) Page 3 Title: Special Study Session Minutes of August 15, 2016 budget impact when being proactive on this issue. Ms. Schnitker stated there is a group that grew out of the Southwest Housing Group, which deals with affordable housing issues. She stated these issues pose a large problem nationwide and locally. She noted the city is seeing investors coming in, making improvements to rental complexes, and increasing rents. Ms. Schnitker added there are many people working on this issue from the county and neighboring cities. The Urban Land Institute also explores what cities can do. The city will work with others on this project, focusing on the regional impact. Mr. Harmening stated that if the city provided rental assistance it would be a very large budget impact. Councilmember Mavity stated the more the city can do to work with housing partners, the better. Councilmember Brausen added he would like to see this issue be controlled by the city’s affordable housing programs, noting that areas around the light rail will be in high demand and need to be affordable. He added the council will need to insist that developers provide affordable housing. Mr. Harmening asked if the council has any feedback on the estimated levy increase needed for 2017, and if so, staff will need to know this, especially if the council wants to reduce the percentage significantly. Mayor Spano noted that last year construction permit costs were at an all-time record and asked if this is expected again in 2017. Mr. Harmening stated that it is expected that construction permits will exceed the $250 million range, assuming major projects that are expected to be approved by Council will start construction this fall. Mayor Spano asked where the civic center/community center project might fit into the budget discussion, and if any funds were allocated for this. Mr. Harmening stated this is being worked on with Councilmembers Lindberg and Hallfin and the school district sub-group, but at this time no funds have been set aside. Mr. Simon also noted that in October, an interactive debt model for potential projects will be reviewed by the council. Mayor Spano asked how to get the city over the 14% threshold in the composting program and how much will be allocated to push forward on solid waste education. Ms. Deno stated programs and education in this area are in the solid waste fund and do not affect the general fund. Mr. Harmening stated staff will discuss this further with the council in the fall. Councilmember Mavity asked who will feel the most impact with the upcoming levy - homeowners or the commercial sector - and how is the balance at this point. Mr. Simon stated single family values went up 5.3% vs. the commercial increase of 9.6%, so there may be a shift to the commercial sector He noted staff will be able to project this better in the next few weeks when more data is received from Hennepin County. Councilmember Lindberg asked how it is going with benefits and the recent change when the city increased the employer contribution for family coverage. Ms. Deno stated the city is looking at benefits renewal now for 2017 and 2018, and things are moving in the right direction. Ms. Deno stated the change was made the city increased employer contribution for family coverage in two steps starting at 65% and now at 70%. She noted this may be looked at further. City employees were very appreciative of this coverage, and it was not brought up in contract negotiations by th e unions. Councilmember Brausen stated if the 6.9% increase in the levy anticipates all the staff additions listed here, he is supportive. Mr. Harmening stated this is not yet final, but staff wants the council to be aware in advance. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 3d) Page 4 Title: Special Study Session Minutes of August 15, 2016 Mayor Spano opened the discussion on sidewalks, recognizing the number of citizens present at the meeting carrying snow shovels. Mayor Spano noted this was an issue that has been discussed and reviewed in the past. Mr. Harmening added that the council has asked staff to look at snow removal for all sidewalks in the community. He stated staff looked at using seasonal employees, contractors, and adding staff members. He noted that if it is contracted out, the cost is over $1 million per year. Seasonal staffing would cost about $750,000 per year. Councilmember Sanger stated she brought up this question again and thinks it is past due the time when the city should be shoveling everyone’s sidewalks. She stated the following points: Sidewalks are publicly owned, provide for the safety of the public, and are not of specific benefit to the property owner. They are for everyone to use, so like roads, alleys, and streetlights, they are a public benefit. She added that sidewalks are public infrastructure, and by not plowing certain sidewalks and plowing others, the city is putting an assessment on those who have to shovel their own sidewalks. She added it is not equitable if those folks shovel or pay to have it shoveled. Almost 60 miles are cleared by the property owner, and 48 miles are cleared by the city. There is a tax assessment on the 48 miles, and this is against the principles of equity for our residents. The current system of classifying sidewalks is arbitrary, and it is difficult for residents to identify a neighborhood sidewalk vs. a community sidewalk. Community sidewalks help people get to schools, parks, and bus stops. However, this has been applied in an arbitrary manner, and for example on the Ottawa sidewalk that leads to the bus stop, one side is plowed by city, and the other side is not plowed by city. She added that this is an artificial distinction. St. Louis Park has an aging population. In order for people to stay in their homes, the city will need to shovel their sidewalks. The city has committed to active living and walking more, so the city needs to take care of shoveling, especially since sidewalks are being added. Likewise, if the city wants to promote Connect the Park, shoveling city sidewalks must be part of the program. Councilmember Sanger stated she liked the report, noting the cost of shoveling by part time staff, and she would like to see it added to this year’s budget. She added that if the council does not agree with her on this topic, then the city should not shovel anyone’s sidewalk, in order to be equitable. Councilmember Lindberg stated there is an important distinction here, and the city should have policy conversations about the why and where of shoveling and also be clear about what we are doing with the Connect the Park project. He added he has concerns about using seasonal employees; and having to deal with this in labor negotiations. Councilmember Brausen stated he does not have a sidewalk or alley, but he does understand the importance of this issue. When he did have a sidewalk, he cleared the snow himself. However, he does have some discomfort with this issue and the idea of civic obligation versus homeowner obligation. He noted with diseased trees, the city has split the cost with residents. He stated he would like more information before discussing this further and noted the city’s first obligation is to clean the streets. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 3d) Page 5 Title: Special Study Session Minutes of August 15, 2016 Councilmember Mavity added she understands where this is coming from, but it should not be framed as an equity issue. She noted the city needs to focus on the problem and look at the aging population. If an elderly person is having a problem keeping sidewalks clean, then the city needs to address this problem. She added she still needs more information on this and stated it is not an issue of equity. It is an issue of what the problem is and how to get folks help for this problem. Mayor Spano added this is not just an issue for seniors. He agreed with Councilmember Mavity, stating the critical issue is about the problem and how to solve it, rather than just throwing money at it. He noted an example where he and his family helped an older next door neighbor with his snow removal, pointing out there are services, neighbors, and programs to help those in need. Mayor Spano stated these opportunities need to be explored further. Councilmember Sanger reiterated this is an issue of equitable use of tax dollars and doing for some and not doing for others. She added this needs to be consistent for all across the board. Councilmember Mavity stated there is confusion between equity and equality. Mr. Harmening stated that hiring seasonal or part-time people to clear sidewalks sounds like an easy, inexpensive fix; however, the biggest concern would be in not meeting expectations. He added there could be issues with not being able to hire a sufficient number of part-time people who are willing and able to work with an unknown schedule, and people not showing up for work when called upon. He is not confident the city could deliver, so he would not recommend it as a viable option. Councilmember Mavity added the city should be asking who cannot shovel their sidewalk, and then addressing their needs. Mayor Spano added the practicality of going door to door and asking folks does not make this an arbitrary distinction. He added the city plows the sidewalks that are most used for getting to schools and bus stops, noting he pays taxes to have sidewalks cleared in other areas of the city. He stated that at some point, there may be folks who come to the city and say “I don’t have sidewalks, so I don’t want to pay for shoveling,” or “I don’t have kids in school, so I don’t want to pay for schools in the city.” The consensus of the Council was to not move forward with this initiative as this time. The meeting adjourned at 7:20 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Jake Spano, Mayor Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: September 6, 2016 Minutes: 3e UNOFFICIAL MINUTES CITY COUNCIL MEETING ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA AUGUST 15, 2016 1. Call to Order Mayor Spano called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. Councilmembers present: Mayor Jake Spano, Tim Brausen, Steve Hallfin, Gregg Lindberg, Anne Mavity, Thom Miller, and Susan Sanger. Councilmembers absent: Steve Hallfin and Thom Miller. Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), City Attorney (Mr. Mattick), Housing Programs Coordinator (Ms. Olson), Principal Planner (Ms. McMonigal), Assistant Zoning Administrator (Mr. Morrison), Planning & Zoning Supervisor (Mr. Walther), and Recording Secretary (Ms. Pappas). Guests: Volunteer Students of the Westwood Hills Nature Center Jr. Naturalist Program; Becky Bakken and Doug McIntyre of Discover St. Louis Park; Dean Dovolis, DJA Architects; Tony Bronco, Ryan Companies; David Keiner, Meadowbrook; and Bob Cunningham, Melrose. 1a. Pledge of Allegiance 1b. Roll Call 2. Presentations 2a. Westwood Hills Nature Center Junior Naturalists Recognition Mayor Spano issued recognition certificates to the 2016 Westwood Hills Nature Center Junior Naturalists. The volunteers were from St. Louis Park, Golden Valley, Hopkins, Minneapolis, Rockford, and Robbinsdale. He noted how far these students come to volunteer their time at the Westwood Hills Nature Center and added that they are an asset to the community, and the city appreciates them. With energy and commitment, the Junior Naturalists work with animals, lead hikes, and staff summer day camps. Together, the group has donated over 1,600 hours this season. The Junior Naturalists thanked the Mayor and the city for continued support of their activities. Councilmember Brausen stated he lives near Westwood, and this program is indicative of the spirit of St. Louis Park. The spirit of volunteerism permeates the whole community, and he is proud of them. He added that he hopes they will be engaged in the upcoming visioning process. 2b. Recognition of Donations City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 3e) Page 2 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of August 15, 2016 Mayor Spano thanked Jeanne and Steve Prawer for their very generous $2,200 donation for a bench at Westwood Hills Nature Center. 3. Approval of Minutes 3a. City Council Special Study Session Minutes July 18, 2016 It was moved by Councilmember Brausen, seconded by Councilmember Lindberg, to approve the July 28, 2016 Special Study Session Meeting Minutes as presented. The motion passed 5-0 (Councilmembers Hallfin and Miller absent). 3b. City Council Minutes July 18, 2016 It was moved by Councilmember Brausen, seconded by Councilmember Lindberg, to approve the July 18, 2016 City Council Meeting Minutes as presented. The motion passed 5-0 (Councilmembers Hallfin and Miller absent). 3c. City Council Special Study Session Minutes August 1, 2016 It was moved by Councilmember Sanger, seconded by Councilmember Brausen, to approve the August 1, 2016 Special Study Session Meeting Minutes as presented. The motion passed 5-0 (Councilmembers Hallfin and Miller absent). 4. Approval of Agenda and Items on Consent Calendar 4a. Approve Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance No. 2497-16 amending Chapter 36 of the St. Louis Park Code of Ordinances relating to zoning to opt-out of Minnesota Statutes Section 462.3593 which defines and regulates Temporary Family Health Care Dwellings, and to approve the Summary Ordinance for Publication. 4b. Approve right-of-way purchase in the total amount of $130,500 for Parcel 12 (R & N Real Estate, LLC for 3501 Louisiana Ave) and authorize the City Attorney to execute stipulation of settlement. 4c. Adopt Resolution No. 16-095 approving acceptance of a monetary donation from Jeanne and Steve Prawer in the amount of $2,200 for Westwood Hills Nature Center. 4d. Adopt Resolution No. 16-096 acknowledging the issuance of a substitute confirming letter of credit to secure the City’s variable rate demand multifamily housing refunding revenue bonds (Urban Park Apartments Project), series 2010B, and approving and authorizing the execution of documents related thereto. 4e. Adopt Resolution No. 16-097 authorizing the special assessment for the repair of the sewer service line at 2731 Salem Avenue South, St. Louis Park, Minnesota. P.I.D. 31-029-24-32-0140 4f. Adopt Resolution No. 16-098 authorizing the elimination of permit parking restrictions in front of 3125 Idaho Ave. S. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 3e) Page 3 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of August 15, 2016 4g. Adopt Resolution No. 16-099 supporting the partnership between Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) and Park Nicollet to protect, restore, enhance, and maintain Minnehaha Creek. 4h. Adopt Resolution No. 16-100 accepting work and authorizing final payment in the amount of $65,254.02 for Project 2012-1000 Local Street Rehabilitation Project (Area 1) with ASTECH Corporation, Contract No. 35-13. 4i. Approve for filing Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of July 20, 2016. It was moved by Councilmember Mavity, seconded by Councilmember Lindberg, to approve the Agenda and items listed on the Consent Calendar and to waive reading of all resolutions and ordinances. The motion passed 5-0 (Councilmembers Hallfin and Miller absent). 5. Boards and Commissions - None 6. Public Hearings 6a. St. Louis Park Liquor – Off Sale Intoxicating Liquor License (Ownership Change) Ms. Kennedy presented the staff report and application received from Kevin Tran for an off-sale intoxicating liquor license for the premises at 6316 Minnetonka Blvd. Mr. Tran will be the new sole owner and store manager of St. Louis Park Liquor, an existing off-sale liquor store. The licensed premises is not proposed to change and will continue to be approximately 1,200 square feet in size. The applicant provided proof of liquor liability insurance with his license application. Ms. Kennedy noted the police department completed a background investigation on the applicant and found nothing that warranted denial of the license application at this time. Mayor Spano opened the public hearing. No speakers were present. Mayor Spano closed the public hearing. It was moved by Councilmember Sanger, seconded by Councilmember Brausen, to approve application from Kevin Tran dba St. Louis Park Liquor for an Off-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for the premises located at 6316 Minnetonka Blvd., for the license term ending March 1, 2017. The motion passed 5-0 (Councilmembers Hallfin and Miller absent). 6b. Parkway 25 - Public Hearing and First Reading of Ordinance Vacating Drainage and Utility Easements Ms. Mardell presented the staff report regarding The Parkway 25 redevelopment site located at 4001 and 4025 Highway 7. The redevelopment proposal includes a preliminary and final plat that will combine two parcels into one parcel, and a preliminary and final planned unit development (PUD) for a mixed use development, including 111 residential units and approximately 8,500 square feet of commercial space. The proposed site design includes several encroachments into existing drainage utility easements. In order for the proposed development to proceed, these easements need to be vacated. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 3e) Page 4 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of August 15, 2016 Ms. Mardell stated the applicant is requesting the city vacate drainage utility easements for the properties noted in the staff report, and the development plan proposes using this easement area for an underground storm water management system, underground parking, and building improvements. The developer is proposing two new drainage utility easements that better suit the site and development, and that maintain the city’s interests for ongoing easements. Mayor Spano opened the public hearing. No speakers were present. Mayor Spano closed the public hearing. It was moved by Councilmember Sanger, seconded by Councilmember Mavity, to approve first reading of an Ordinance vacating drainage utility easements and set the second reading of Ordinance for September 6, 2016. The motion passed 5-0 (Councilmembers Hallfin and Miller absent). 7. Requests, Petitions, and Communications from the Public – None 8. Resolutions, Ordinances, Motions and Discussion Items 8a. Master Marketing Agreement – Discover St. Louis Park and City of Golden Valley Becky Bakken, Discover St. Louis Park, presented the report and asked for approval and ratification of the agreement of the Master Marketing Agreement between Discover St. Louis Park and the City of Golden Valley. Councilmember Mavity stated Discover St. Louis Park has been a smashing success, and the city understands why folks want to be part of it. She added that St. Louis Park branding has been helpful in this, and one of the keys to this success is the city’s tight community identity. Councilmember Lindberg agreed with Councilmember Mavity, noting this has been a wild success. The branding has been great, and it will be great to partner with Golden Valley. Ms. Bakken noted the agreement also provides an easy out for both parties, while both cities will evaluate on a yearly basis. Mr. Harmening added this has been an incredible success, and in June, 2016, St. Louis Park hotels and Discover SLP had the best month ever in the program’s five years. He recognized Doug McIntyre from Discover St. Louis Park, who drafted the agreement. Mayor Spano added this is a winning situation for all. It was moved by Councilmember Brausen, seconded by Councilmember Mavity, to approve and ratify the Master Marketing Agreement between Discover St. Louis Park (DSLP) and the City of Golden Valley. The motion passed 5-0 (Councilmembers Hallfin and Miller absent). City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 3e) Page 5 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of August 15, 2016 8b. Ordinance Amending St. Louis Park City Code Chapter 3, Section 70 (g) (1) Ms. Kennedy presented the staff report regarding the first reading of an ordinance to amend St. Louis Park City Code Chapter 3, Section 70 (g) (l) to exempt congressionally chartered veterans organizations holding a club liquor license from the minimum 50% food-liquor ratio requirement and to schedule the second reading of the ordinance on September 6, 2016. Ms. Kennedy noted this item was discussed by the council at two separate study sessions in response to a request received from the Frank Lundberg American Legion Post #282. The proposed ordinance was drafted based on the direction received from the council. It was moved by Councilmember Mavity, seconded by Councilmember Brausen, to approve the first reading of an ordinance amending St. Louis Park City Code Chapter 3, Section 70 (g) (1) to Exempt Congressionally Chartered Veterans Organizations Holding a Club Liquor License from the Minimum 50% Food-Liquor Ratio Requirement and to schedule the second reading of the ordinance on September 6, 2016. Councilmember Sanger stated she would not support this motion, but added this had nothing to do with any veterans’ organizations or the American Legion. She explained her objection relates to the underlying rationale for the existing 50-50 requirement. She stated that she has no objection except for public safety reasons. The Legion should be held to the same standards as every other entity in town, so she will not support this. Mayor Spano noted this ordinance is not written in stone and can be changed at any time again if needed. The motion passed 4-1 (Councilmember Sanger opposed; Councilmembers Hallfin and Miller absent). 8c. Consulting Services for Community Visioning Initiative Ms. McMonigal summarized that the council met with two consultant groups to discuss the process for updating the city’s vision and comprehensive plan. At the August 1 study session, Council directed staff to work with Next Generation Consulting Group to create a work scope and contract. It is expected the consultant will begin work in September. Councilmember Mavity stated she is very excited about this consultant’s proposal and the prospect of all residents having the opportunity to weigh in on the visioning process. Councilmember Lindberg agreed and noted this is a great start to the visioning process. He added the consultant understands what the city is looking for, and he is excited to see the results of the visioning process. He encouraged everyone to participate in the process in order to set the stage for the future of St. Louis Park. Councilmember Sanger also agreed, noting it will be important that all members of the community participate and give their opinions. She encouraged citizens to participate in meetings or take surveys and get involved so the city can get their feedback. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 3e) Page 6 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of August 15, 2016 Councilmember Brausen asked everyone to please come forward and share their thoughts and vision for St. Louis Park. He added that the city is hoping to have links on the website to do this. Mayor Spano stated the council viewed two good proposals, but this one really focused on who is at the table to participate in the visioning process. He added, as the city goes through the race equity initiative, it will be important to have everyone involved, noting it is important folks weigh in on this. It was moved by Councilmember Lindberg, seconded by Councilmember Mavity, to direct staff to negotiate a final contract and scope of work with Next Generation Consulting for St. Louis Park’s Community Visioning process and authorize execution of the contract by the City Manager and Mayor. The motion passed 5-0 (Councilmembers Hallfin and Miller absent). 8d. Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Ms. Mardell explained the Sela Group is requesting a Preliminary and Final PUD and Preliminary and Final Plat for redevelopment of the former Vescio’s Restaurant and ValueStay Inn site. The sites are proposed to be combined and developed into a 5-story, mixed use building, with 111 residential units, approximately 8,500 square feet of commercial space, and parking located in two surface lots and in an underground parking ramp. The applicant is not seeking assistance from the City of St. Louis Park. Ms. Mardell explained that various design views of the planned development were presented, including front and rear views. She noted there will be 110 new trees, 338 shrubs, and 1,146 perennials. Ms. Mardell stated the Planning Commission recommended approval of this plan on July 20. Councilmember Sanger stated she is pleased to move for approval on this project, noting it is a well-designed plan with good-sized units. She added no one has called to complain to her about it, and it will be a huge improvement aesthetically in the area. She added her only concern is that the developer has provided for a lot of bicycle storage; however, there is no access to bike trails. She hopes this is something that can be worked on in the future. Mr. Dovolis, developer with DJR Architecture, stated the rent will be in the $2 per square foot range. He added that studio units are 30% larger than typical, and there will be only 2 studios in the complex. He added the building is meant to be a legacy building with long- term residents. Councilmember Brausen raised the issue of affordable housing, especially in this area near the proposed light rail. He noted while this development will not include affordable housing, he hopes the council will discuss this type of policy in the future. He added he will support this project but wants to put affordable housing on the radar. Councilmember Mavity agreed on the applicability of inclusionary housing but added she does not want to change the rules midstream. She noted the council will need to revisit this issue, and soon. She also asked staff if the frontage road would be retained, as it relates to City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 3e) Page 7 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of August 15, 2016 the light rail project and this area of development. Mr. Walther stated there are some opportunities for flexibility with this plan, as well as opportunities for shared parking in case the frontage road is eliminated. Councilmember Sanger asked for a project timeline. Mr. Dovolis stated they would begin the project in the spring, and it usually takes about one year for occupancy. Councilmember Sanger asked about the potential changing of the name of CSAH 25 and where the city is on this discussion. Mr. Walther pointed out the city has looked at this; however, there are no efforts at this point. Mayor Spano stated it is a county road. Mr. Harmening stated the county has said cities can name county roads whatever they like, but it will still remain a county road. Councilmember Lindberg stated there is a density issue, and he looks forward to a conversation exploring ways to expand affordable housing, however, this project should not be changed in the middle of development. He added market saturation data will also be good to have. It was moved by Councilmember Sanger, seconded by Councilmember Mavity, to adopt Resolution No. 16-104, approving the Preliminary and Final Plat and to approve the Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) subject to conditions as recommended by staff and set the second reading of the PUD ordinance for September 6, 2016. The motion passed 5-0 (Councilmembers Hallfin and Miller absent). 8e. 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Ms. Mardell explained that Ryan Companies and the Excelsior Group are requesting a Preliminary and Final PUD and Preliminary and Final Plat to allow construction of an 11 story, 335,710 square foot, Class A office tower and a 7-level, 1,214 stall parking structure. This development is the 4th phase of the Central Park West PUD and features a 3,200 square foot ground floor coffee shop/deli; outdoor meeting space; fitness facility; 114 space indoor bike storage room; and locker rooms. The PUD is a rezoning of the property and zoning text amendment under the city’s PUD ordinance. The applicant is also requesting a Preliminary and Final Plat to subdivide the existing Outlot A into two new additions - one for the proposed North Tower and one for a future South Tower, still in concept. Ms. Mardell stated that on May 11 the applicant held a neighborhood meeting, which had three attendees. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 20 and voted unanimously to recommend approval of the application. Councilmember Brausen asked if the green space and underground watering would be included in the development. Ms. Mardell said it would be included. Councilmember Sanger stated she likes the space for bicycles but added it is difficult for residents to bike to the West End. She asked staff if St. Louis Park and Golden Valley are working together to develop a bike lane from the trail to the West End. Staff stated that a plan is being developed for trail access on the east side of Highway 100 and the underpass of Highway 100. It is a proposal for an off-road trail on the Golden Valley side and on the east side of Quentin Avenue to the JCC area, with a trail on the south side, as well. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 3e) Page 8 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of August 15, 2016 Mayor Spano asked the developer when they would be breaking ground on the project. Mr. Barranco stated they are actively marketing the site and having a great response right now. He added there is no ground breaking date set as yet, but they do plan to start in the spring or summer of 2017. It was moved by Councilmember Brausen, seconded by Councilmember Lindberg, to adopt Resolution No. 16-105, approving the Preliminary and Final Plat and to approve the Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) subject to conditions as recommended by staff and set the second reading of the PUD ordinance for September 6, 2016. The motion passed 5-0 (Councilmembers Hallfin and Miller absent). 8f. Meadowbrook Manor – Conditional Use Permit. Resolution No. 16-101 Mr. Walther stated the applicant, Sambatek, Inc., on behalf of the owner of Meadowbrook Manor Apartments, LLC, is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to construct a clubhouse, swimming pool, maintenance shed, and associated grading work at the apartment complex, within a multi-family residential development in the R-4 Multiple Family Residence Zoning District. The Planning Commission reviewed this on July 20 and recommended approval. Councilmember Mavity stated the drawings and renditions of this project are well done; however, she and some residents have concerns about the increased pressure on rents in this complex. She noted the Meadowbrook ownership changed a few months back. There are 551 units of affordable housing at Meadowbrook, and it did come to the council’s attention that some residents were evicted. While the city has an interest in these buildings being well-managed, there is also a concern about how to retain this naturally occurring affordable housing. She added that while the council appreciates these improvements, many residents have asked the council to look at this issue and also asked if the city has policies in place to maintain the affordability of Meadowbrook. She stated she hopes this topic will be on a council agenda for discussion soon. Councilmember Brausen asked if there is a fence around the pool area. Mr. Walther said yes. Councilmember Brausen asked if there are lifeguards at the pool. David Keinert, Portfolio Director at Meadowbrook, stated there are no plans for lifeguards at the pool; however, there is 24-hour security, and staff is trained in CPR and first aid. Councilmember Sanger asked if this planned improvement is part of a larger plan for more common areas. Mr. Keinert stated that it is the only area planned for improvement and the only location where these services can be provided to residents. Councilmember Brausen asked what will happen to the current tenants in the building that will be taken down. Mr. Keinert stated the building is empty now, and the residents have moved into other units in the complex or into other apartment communities. Mayor Spano stated he visited Meadowbrook on National Night Out, and there were a lot of folks asking questions about the changes. He added he had several questions from residents about the basketball court and if it would be added back to the complex. He stated he hoped it could be worked out, especially for the older kids living there. Mr. Keinert City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 3e) Page 9 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of August 15, 2016 stated the basketball court has been out of commission for a while, and they have only had one person ask about it at their office, so he was surprised at the concern. He stated it may be brought back in the future, but at this time they are focusing on their new amenities. Councilmember Mavity asked if the Meadowbrook Collaborative continues to be part of this plan. Mr. Keinert answered that it will continue to be an important part of Meadowbrook. Councilmember Mavity thanked Mr. Keinert for that commitment. Councilmember Mavity asked if they will be doing pro formas and estimated costs over the next years, and if improvements are made if they will be factored in. She also asked if they are anticipating any larger improvements in the complex. Mr. Keinert stated they like to keep the apartments full, so they are working to keep costs down and develop relationships with residents to ensure people will stay at Meadowbrook. At this time, they have no amenities, so the pools and community spaces will encourage book clubs and ESL clubs. He added they are a market rate community and he does not see this as a reason to increase their rates. It was moved by Councilmember Mavity, seconded by Councilmember Brausen, to adopt Resolution No. 16-101, granting a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for Meadowbrook Manor and allowing construction of a Clubhouse, Swimming Pool and Maintenance Shed, and associated grading work at 6922-6932 Meadowbrook Blvd., subject to conditions recommended by staff. The motion passed 5-0 (Councilmembers Hallfin and Miller absent). 8g. Arlington Row West Plat Revision and First Reading Major PUD Amendment. Resolution No. 16-102 8h. Arlington Row East Planned Unit Development (PUD) Major Amendment It was noted the developer, Melrose Company, submitted an application for a revision to the plat for Arlington Row West to correct a surveyor error in the previously approved plat. In addition, applications have been submitted for major amendments to the PUD’s for both Arlington Row East and Arlington Row West to add solar installations designed to be located above carports in the parking lots of both sites. Councilmember Brausen asked how wide the solar panels will be. Mr. Cunningham from Melrose stated that the three panels will be 15 feet total. Councilmember Brausen also asked if there would be any drainage issues. Mr. Cunningham stated no. Councilmember Sanger stated she is glad to see they will be installing solar panels and asked why a major amendment needed to be included. Mr. Walther stated this is because the PUD approvals were specific to the site plan documents submitted with the application and because the panels are on car port structures that were not included in the original plan. Councilmember Mavity agreed that the solar panel addition is great. Mr. Cunningham stated he is still working to get funding for this project, and he will keep the council posted on this. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 3e) Page 10 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of August 15, 2016 Councilmember Brausen stated he is very supportive of this project. It is in his ward, and folks have been asking when the project will start. He added this will be a wonderful addition to the area. Mayor Spano agreed the solar panels made the project better and stated he was very happy to see this. It was moved by Councilmember Brausen, seconded by Councilmember Mavity, to adopt Resolution No. 16-102, approving the major amendment to the Final Plat of Arlington Row West, to approve the First Reading of Ordinance amending Chapter 36 of the City Code relating to Arlington Row West Planned Unit Development, and to schedule the Second Reading for September 6, 2016, and to approve the First Reading of an Ordinance amending Chapter 36 of the City Code relating to Arlington Row East Planned Unit Development and set the Second Reading for September 6, 2016. The motion passed 5-0 (Councilmembers Hallfin and Miller absent). 8i. First Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Pertaining to Accessory Buildings and Signs Mr. Walther noted that staff is requesting an amendment to the zoning code that proposes to: 1. Update the maximum size accessory building that can be constructed without a building permit and require a zoning permit for those buildings. 2. Correct conflicting setbacks required for accessory buildings. 3. Increase the size maximum allowed for signs in the R-4 Multiple Family Residence district and the R-C High-Density Multiple Family Residence district. 4. Decrease the minimum setback required for signs at schools, community centers, libraries, religious institutions, and other similar uses. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the ordinance amendment on July 20, 2016. It was moved by Councilmember Mavity, seconded by Councilmember Brausen, to approve the First Reading of an Ordinance amending the Zoning Code pertaining to accessory buildings and signs, and to set the Second Reading for September 6, 2016. The motion passed 5-0 (Councilmembers Hallfin and Miller absent). 9. Communications Councilmember Brausen thanked citizens for their hospitality on National Night Out. 10. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 9:50 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Jake Spano, Mayor Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: September 6, 2016 Consent Agenda Item: 4a EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Approval of City Disbursements RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to accept for filing City Disbursement Claims for the period of July 23 through August 26, 2016. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council desire to approve City disbursements in accordance with Section 6.11 – Disbursements – How Made, of the City’s Charter? SUMMARY: The Finance Division prepares this report on a monthly basis for the City Council to review and approve. The attached reports show both City disbursements paid by physical check and those by wire transfer or Automated Clearing House (ACH) when applicable. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Review and approval of the information follows the City’s Charter and provides another layer of oversight to further ensure fiscal stewardship. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: City Disbursements Prepared by: Patricia A. Sulander, Accountant Reviewed by: Tim Simon, Chief Financial Officer Approved by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director 8/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 14:35:45R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 1Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/26/20167/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 28,125.004101 MANHATTAN PARK LLC ESCROWS GENERAL 28,125.00 239.29A-1 OUTDOOR POWER INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 2.00PARK MAINTENANCE G & A SMALL TOOLS 241.29 67.50AAA LAMBERTS LANDSCAPE PRODUCT SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 67.50 110.22AARSVOLD, JOEL REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 110.22 650.00ABDULLAHI, HINDA JOINT COMM POLICE PARTNERSHIP MEETING EXPENSE 650.00 449.54ABELSON, SHARON NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 449.54 199.80ABERNATHY, LISA ORGANIZED REC G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 199.80 289.56ABLE HOSE & RUBBER INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 289.56 280.00ACEVEDO, ERIKA FACILITY ROOM RENTAL REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 280.00 346.50ACROSS THE STREET PRODUCTIONS OPERATIONS TRAINING 346.50 50.54ACT ASPHALT SPECIALTIES INSPECTIONS G & A BUILDING 50.54 6,283.59ACTION FLEET INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 6,283.59 83,339.76ADVANCED DISPOSAL SERVICES SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS YARD WASTE SERVICE 38,035.92SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL YARD WASTE SERVICE 121,375.68 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 2 8/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 14:35:45R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 2Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/26/20167/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 8,450.00AIM ELECTRONICS PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 8,450.00 100.00ALDERSGATE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH ADMINISTRATION G & A RENTAL BUILDINGS 100.00 1,109.00ALLIANCE MECH SRVCS INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 13,491.00MUNICIPAL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 14,600.00 13,536.49-ALLIED BLACKTOP STREET CAPITAL PROJ BAL SHEET RETAINED PERCENTAGE 270,729.86CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 257,193.37 12,770.47AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING INC PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT SOIL TESTING SERVICES 12,770.47 495.87AMERICAN TIRE DISTRIBUTORS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 495.87 3,122.45ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 3,122.45 3,570.70ANDERSEN INC, EARL INSTALLATION OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 3,570.70 487.50ANDERSON, EVAN GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 487.50 174.64ANDERSON, JOSH PLAYGROUNDS MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 174.64 31.51ANDVIK, MOLLY WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 31.51 853.48ANIXER INC TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 853.48 801.10APACHE GROUP OF MINNESOTA REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES 801.10 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 3 8/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 14:35:45R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 3Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/26/20167/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 384.00APPLE INC TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 384.00 385.00APWAENGINEERING G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 385.00 1,500.00AQULIA PROPERTIES ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 1,500.00 3,266.00AR500 ARMOR POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 3,266.00 100.00ARAIZA, YVONNE PICNIC SHELTERS RENT REVENUE 100.00 1,173.88ARCPRINTING/REPRO SERVICES EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 116.70ORGANIZED REC G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 1,290.58 188.00ARNTSON, JACOB INSPECTIONS G & A BUILDING 188.00 762.16ASET SUPPLY AND PAPER INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SUPPLY 762.16 3,985.73ASPEN MILLS OPERATIONS UNIFORMS 583.64OPERATIONSPROTECTIVE CLOTHING 24.56OPERATIONSEMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 4,593.93 170.92AT&T MOBILITY CELLPHONES, IPADS, ETC.OFFICE EQUIPMENT 170.92 219.04ATIR ELECTRIC CORPORATION OPERATIONS REPAIRS 219.04 5,311.50AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 5,311.50 1,812.88AVOLVE SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 1,812.88 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 4 8/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 14:35:45R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 4Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/26/20167/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 3,470.00AWWAWATER UTILITY G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 3,470.00 231.25BACHMANSBEAUTIFICATION / FLOWERS OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 231.25 352.60BARKER, BOB COMPANY POLICE G & A SUBSISTENCE SUPPLIES 352.60 1,622.82BARNA, GUZY & STEFFEN LTD HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,622.82 92.89BATTERIES + BULBS WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 92.89 504.00BECKER, SHEILA FITNESS PROGRAMS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 504.00 66.74BELLOTTI, RACHEL WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 66.74 182.28BENJAMIN, NATALIE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 182.28 73.53BENSON, JANET REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 73.53 405.88BERSCHEID, GARY NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 405.88 64.88BERTHIAUME, BRUCE WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 64.88 512.00BIFFS INC CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 512.00 61,365.00BIRDAIR INC.PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 61,365.00 200.00BIRRU, YESHAREG JOINT COMM POLICE PARTNERSHIP MEETING EXPENSE City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 5 8/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 14:35:45R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 5Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/26/20167/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 200.00 110.00BLIZZARD SKI & SNOWBOARD SCHOOL FACILITY ROOM RENTAL RENT REVENUE 110.00 147.41BLOMSNESS, MATT GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 332.52POLICE G & A TRAVEL/MEETINGS 984.00EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A TUITION 1,463.93 40.05BOBLETT, PAUL WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 40.05 192.18BOHN WELDING INC SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 192.18 6,369.50BOLTON & MENK INC STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 47,571.50STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 53,941.00 2,170.00BORMANN CONSTRUCTION INC PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,450.00PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 7,275.00PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT MAINTENAN OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 10,895.00 649.50BOUND TREE MEDICAL, LLC POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 435.12OPERATIONSOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 1,084.62 2,130.00BRAD'S LANDSCAPING LLC CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,130.00 3,829.00BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,829.00 244.40BRO TEX INC PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 244.40 229.92BROCK WHITE CO LLC PATCHING-PERMANENT EQUIPMENT PARTS 229.92 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 6 8/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 14:35:45R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 6Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/26/20167/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 1,000.00BROOKSIDE MOBILE PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 1,000.00 520.87BROWNDALE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 520.87 345.91BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC ALLEY MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 345.91 487.50BURGESON, ERIC GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 487.50 200.00BURNET TITLE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 200.00 500.00BYRD, SRIYANI ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 500.00 254.65CALGON CARBON CORP REILLY BUDGET CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SUPPLY 254.65 19,250.23CAMPBELL KNUTSON PROF ASSOC ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL SERVICES 57.75PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT LEGAL SERVICES 189.75STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A LEGAL SERVICES 412.50WATER UTILITY G&A LEGAL SERVICES 19,910.23 112.05CANTOR, SUSAN REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 112.05 1,126.29CARLSON, AURTHUR J EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A TUITION 1,126.29 248.16CBIZ BENEFITS & INSURANCE SERVICES INC EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 248.16 2,797.40CDW GOVERNMENT INC POLICE & FIRE PENSION G&A MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENT 19,655.80TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 22,453.20 4,150.00CENTER ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT MOVE-UP PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 7 8/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 14:35:45R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 7Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/26/20167/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 24,162.00TRANSFORMATION LOAN OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,890.00CES RESID ENERGY CONSERVATION OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 31,202.00 779.51CENTERPOINT ENERGY FACILITY OPERATIONS HEATING GAS 1,313.01WATER UTILITY G&A HEATING GAS 29.21REILLY G & A HEATING GAS 134.47SEWER UTILITY G&A HEATING GAS 309.82PARK MAINTENANCE G & A HEATING GAS 22.74WESTWOOD G & A HEATING GAS 39.04NATURALIST PROGRAMMER HEATING GAS 2,627.80 489.70CENTERPOINT ENERGY SERVICES INC FACILITY OPERATIONS HEATING GAS 6,514.53REC CENTER BUILDING HEATING GAS 7,004.23 10,600.00CENTRAL PENSION FUND EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S OTHER RETIREMENT 10,600.00 523.20CENTURY LINK CELLPHONES, IPADS, ETC.TELEPHONE 523.20 19,500.00CI UTILITIES PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 19,500.00 327.95CINTAS CORPORATION FACILITIES MCTE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 95.43FACILITIES MCTE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 273.72AQUATIC PARK G & A CONCESSION SUPPLIES 569.75VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 1,266.85 232.42CITIZENS INDEPENDENT BANK GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 563.09ADMINISTRATION G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 40.00ADMINISTRATION G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 420.88ADMINISTRATION G & A MEETING EXPENSE 81.89HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 173.28HUMAN RESOURCES ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT 155.40HUMAN RESOURCES RECOGNITION 249.00HUMAN RESOURCES TRAINING 110.80HUMAN RESOURCES MEETING EXPENSE City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 8 8/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 14:35:45R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 8Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/26/20167/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 478.01HEALTH IN THE PARK INITIATIVE TRAVEL/MEETINGS 334.27COMM & MARKETING G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 126.83COMM & MARKETING G & A PRINTING & PUBLISHING 30.00COMM & MARKETING G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 14.31COMM & MARKETING G & A MEETING EXPENSE 8.37RESIDENTIAL/BUSINESS COMMUNIC GENERAL SUPPLIES 96.50IT G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 33.34IT G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 30.00IT G & A TRAINING 100.00ASSESSING G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 505.00FINANCE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 50.00FINANCE G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 150.00COMM DEV PLANNING G & A TRAINING 19.66COMM DEV PLANNING G & A BANK CHARGES/CREDIT CD FEES 960.65FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 281.88FACILITIES MCTE G & A OTHER 149.82POLICE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 133.32POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 50.00POLICE G & A TRAINING 5.85POLICE G & A TRAVEL/MEETINGS 274.28POLICE G & A MEETING EXPENSE 534.15OPERATIONSGENERAL SUPPLIES 458.74OPERATIONSFIRE PREVENTION SUPPLIES 150.14OPERATIONSOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 267.93OPERATIONSSMALL TOOLS 215.99OPERATIONSPROTECTIVE CLOTHING 836.67OPERATIONSGENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 599.88OPERATIONSTRAINING 1,783.04OPERATIONSSEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 130.00INSPECTIONS G & A TRAINING 19.30ENGINEERING G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 125.00ENGINEERING G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 366.00ENGINEERING G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 3,945.00ENGINEERING G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 153.86TV PRODUCTION GENERAL SUPPLIES 48.26TV PRODUCTION OFFICE EQUIPMENT 815.72PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 470.99CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 530.00WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 660.58WATER UTILITY G&A TRAINING 10.68ENVIRONMENT & SUSTAINABILITY GENERAL SUPPLIES City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 9 8/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 14:35:45R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 9Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/26/20167/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 10.00ENVIRONMENT & SUSTAINABILITY TRAINING 1,886.53TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 5.05ORGANIZED REC G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 40.00HOLIDAY PROGRAMS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 679.84PERFORMING ARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 356.76PLAYGROUNDSGENERAL SUPPLIES 1,023.19FABULOUS FRIDAYS GENERAL SUPPLIES 232.57FABULOUS FRIDAYS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 291.14INACTIVE - YOUTH PRGMS GENERAL SUPPLIES 123.28PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 5.00PARK MAINTENANCE G & A INTEREST/FINANCE CHARGES 53.53OFF-LEASH DOG PARK GENERAL SUPPLIES 71.83WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 40.35SUMMER CAMP GENERAL SUPPLIES 343.43ARENA MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 219.83ARENA MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT PARTS 825.00AQUATIC PARK G & A CONCESSION SUPPLIES 1,008.56CONCESSIONSCONCESSION SUPPLIES 21.45VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A OFFICE SUPPLIES 180.00VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A TRAINING 25,398.12 300.00CLARK, PEGGY ADULT PROGRAMS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 300.00 300.00CLARK, SCOTT ADULT PROGRAMS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 300.00 15,679.71COLICH & ASSOCIATES ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL SERVICES 15,679.71 7,727.10COLLINS ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTION CO UNINSURED LOSS G&A UNINSURED LOSS 7,727.10 63.46COMCASTOPERATIONSEMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 20.48OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 284.55WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 13.63REC CENTER BUILDING OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 382.12 5,334.25COMCAST CABLE TV PRODUCTION IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 10 8/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 14:35:45R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 10Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/26/20167/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 5,334.25 5,896.56COMMERCIAL ASPHALT COMPANY PATCHING-PERMANENT OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 7,033.97WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 441.82PARK MAINTENANCE G & A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 1,511.60PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 14,883.95 13,585.00-COMMERCIAL REFRIGERATION SYSTEMS INC PARK IMPROVE BALANCE SHEET RETAINED PERCENTAGE 271,700.00PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 258,115.00 8,475.50COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP SUB HENN EMERGENCY REPAIR GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 8,475.50 465.00COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT FUND MOVE-UP PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 465.00 441.00COMPAR INC POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 441.00 450.30CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS INSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 450.30 47.31CONRAD, KEVIN NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 47.31 46.65CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS GRAFFITI CONTROL OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 46.65 7,372.98CONTINENTAL CASUALTY CO EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S LONG TERM CARE INSUR 7,372.98 222.36CONTINENTAL RESEARCH CORP REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES 222.36 8,750.00CORNERSTONE ADVOCACY SERVICE POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 8,750.00 2,939.84CORPORATE MECHANICAL REC CENTER BUILDING BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 2,939.84 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 11 8/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 14:35:45R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 11Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/26/20167/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 487.50CORVER, JOHN GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 487.50 10,530.00COVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES FACILITIES MCTE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 10,530.00 2,100.00CROSLEY, PREMA CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,100.00 172.95CROWN MARKING INC COMM & MARKETING G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 172.95 316.08CUB FOODS POLICE G & A SUBSISTENCE SUPPLIES 316.08 45.00CUKROWSKI, JACQUELINE RENTAL RENT REVENUE 45.00 1,842.56CUMMINS NPOWER LLC FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 1,842.56 765.00CURRAN-MOORE, KIM SOFTBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 765.00 2,242.00CUSTOM PRODUCTS & SERVICES SSD 1 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,917.50SSD 1 G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 2,054.00SSD 2 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,917.50SSD 2 G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 692.00SSD 3 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,042.00SSD #4 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,751.75SSD #5 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,141.00SSD #6 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 14,757.75 50.00CUSTOMIZED FIRE RESCUE TRAINING INC OPERATIONS TRAINING 50.00 4,503.50DALCO ENTERPRISES INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SUPPLY 408.27REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES 4,911.77 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 12 8/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 14:35:45R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 12Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/26/20167/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 109.95DEALER AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 109.95 66.00DEANS PROFESSIONAL PLUMBING INSPECTIONS G & A MECHANICAL 66.00 90.50DEKO FACTORY SERVICE INC VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 90.50 413.95DELEGARD TOOL CO ROUTINE MAINTENANCE SMALL TOOLS 39.86WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 6.19VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A SMALL TOOLS 460.00 6,188.22DEPT LABOR & INDUSTRY INSPECTIONS G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 6,188.22 150.00DEX MEDIA EAST LLC ENTERPRISE G & A ADVERTISING 150.00 150.00DIGITAL PICTURES INC TV PRODUCTION EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 150.00 5,400.00-DJ ELECTRIC SERVICES INC PARK IMPROVE BALANCE SHEET RETAINED PERCENTAGE 136,540.00PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 1,338.58ARENA MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 132,478.58 21,495.95DO-GOOD.BIZ INC COMM & MARKETING G & A POSTAGE 2,530.62COMM & MARKETING G & A PRINTING & PUBLISHING 24,026.57 40.00DOMASK, BENJAMIN INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 40.00 267.50DON'S RODENTS WESTWOOD G & A OTHER 267.50 79.95DOUGHTY, ANNIE REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 79.95 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 13 8/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 14:35:45R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 13Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/26/20167/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 300.15DUBE, JIM INSPECTIONS G & A TRAINING 300.15 81.12DYBEVIK, SARAH NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 81.12 47.21EASTMAN, DYLAN WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 47.21 1,028.11-EBERT CONSTRUCTION PARK IMPROVE BALANCE SHEET RETAINED PERCENTAGE 20,562.25PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 19,534.14 891.25ECM PUBLISHERS INC ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL NOTICES 891.25 40.73EDINA REALTY WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 40.73 60.00EDINA REALTY TITLE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 60.00 300.00-EGAN COMPANIES INC PARK IMPROVE BALANCE SHEET RETAINED PERCENTAGE 6,000.00PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,670.46WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 107.72PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 7,478.18 1,125.00EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC ESCROWS ELIOT PARK 1,125.00 139.44EIDEM, ANNA WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 139.44 143.52EILERS, MARK REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 143.52 514.89EISOLD, JASON REC CENTER BUILDING EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 514.89 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 14 8/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 14:35:45R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 14Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/26/20167/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 7,901.91ELECTRIC PUMP INC SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 200.00PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 8,101.91 122.00ELKIN, PHILLIP ENGINEERING G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 122.00 168.12ELLANSON, LUKE POLICE G & A MOTOR FUELS 16.27POLICE G & A TRAVEL/MEETINGS 184.39 321.18EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 321.18 450.00EMPLOYEE STRATEGIES INC ADMINISTRATION G & A TRAINING 450.00 250.00ENGASSER, HOLLY WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 250.00 6,347.31ENTERPRISE FM TRUST EQUIP/VEHICLE REPLACEMENT RENTAL EQUIPMENT 6,347.31 11,570.00EPIC SECURITY PROFESSIONALS INC PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,714.00PARK MAINTENANCE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 13,284.00 245.00ERICKSON, RICHARD PERFORMING ARTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 245.00 505.00ESCAPE FIRE PROTECTION LLC FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 505.00 906.00ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 906.00 370.00ETTEL & FRANZ ROOFING CO GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 370.00 3,614.00EXTENDOBEDGENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 3,614.00 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 15 8/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 14:35:45R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 15Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/26/20167/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 909.64FACTORY MOTOR PARTS CO GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 34.02GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES 943.66 94.00FAIRMONT FIRE SYSTEMS INC REC CENTER BUILDING OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 94.00 67.18FARNAM, LAURA WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 67.18 165.82FASHINGBAUER, CLAUDIA REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 165.82 198.34FASTENAL COMPANY FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 408.88POLICE G & A POLICE EQUIPMENT 76.95OPERATIONSPROTECTIVE CLOTHING 27.67SEWER UTILITY G&A SMALL TOOLS 2.96REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES 714.80 127.44FECHNER, MARTY ASSESSING G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 127.44 50.92FEDEXHUMAN RESOURCES RECRUITMENT 50.92 17.00FEINBERG, GREG WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 30.00SUMMER CAMP GENERAL SUPPLIES 47.00 129.67FERGUSON WATERWORKS WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 129.67 176.14FERRELLGASREC CENTER BUILDING MOTOR FUELS 176.14 7,554.50FIRE SAFETY USA INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 877.00OPERATIONSSMALL TOOLS 1,953.00TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 10,384.50 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 16 8/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 14:35:45R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 16Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/26/20167/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 160.00FIRST ADVANTAGE LNS SCREENING SOLUTIONS HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 160.00 7,638.76FISCHER MINING LLC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 7,638.76 2,190.00FLAGSHIP RECREATION LLC PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 2,190.00 254.63FLEETPRIDEGENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 254.63 435.00FLEX COMPENSATION INC EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 435.00 12,650.00FORECAST PUBLIC ART ESCROWS GENERAL 12,650.00 127.97FORKLIFTS OF MN INC.VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 110.00TRAININGTRAINING 237.97 2,500.00FOX CREEK PROPERTIES ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 2,500.00 6.79FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 6.79 22.91FREEDMAN, BREANNA HUMAN RIGHTS MEETING EXPENSE 22.91 1,000.00FRIEMAN FAMILY TRUST ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 1,000.00 11.18FRIEMAN, STEVE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 11.18 78.98FRIEMANN, BRIAN WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 78.98 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 17 8/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 14:35:45R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 17Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/26/20167/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 45.84FRONTIER AG & TURF GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 45.84 331.15FRONTIER PRECISION INC PUBLIC WORKS G & A OTHER 4,960.15ENGINEERING G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,291.30 5.29FRYKLUND, ERIK WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 5.29 6,726.75GARTNER REFRIG & MFG INC UNINSURED LOSS G&A UNINSURED LOSS 2,107.25REC CENTER BUILDING BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 979.38ARENA MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 9,813.38 97.99GAUGHAN, KEVIN REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 97.99 250.00GERVAIS, JACOB GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 250.00 1,220.00GHIZONI, DAVE SOFTBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,220.00 5,437.50GIGA BAUER CONSULTING LLC STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5,437.50 1,057.05GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 1,057.05 555.00GRAFIX SHOPPE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 555.00 49.50GRAINGER INC, WW GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 49.50 350.84GREAT NORTHERN LANDSCAPES INC CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 350.84 141.90GREEN ACRES SPRINKLER CO IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 141.90 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 18 8/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 14:35:45R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 18Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/26/20167/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 154.48GREEN HORIZONS WEED CONTROL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 154.48 102.34GREENLIFE SUPPLY LLC ROUTINE MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 102.34 22,500.00-GRESSER COMPANIES INC PARK IMPROVE BALANCE SHEET RETAINED PERCENTAGE 450,000.00PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 427,500.00 483.84GROUP HEALTH INC - WORKSITE EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A HEALTH INSURANCE 483.84 600.00HAGE CONCRETE WORKS CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 600.00 1,402.50HAMILTON, MIKE SOFTBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,402.50 230.00HAMRE, DANIEL INSPECTIONS G & A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE 230.00 7,607.00HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON INC STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7,607.00 30.00HANSEN, CALEB INSPECTIONS G & A TRAINING 30.00 12,095.01-HARDRIVES INC STREET CAPITAL PROJ BAL SHEET RETAINED PERCENTAGE 241,900.20CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 229,805.19 1,000.00HARRIS, MAYA PLAYGROUNDS GENERAL SUPPLIES 500.00PLAYGROUNDSOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,000.00BEAUTIFICATION / FLOWERS OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 3,500.00 11,060.31HAWKINS INC WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 5,488.45AQUATIC PARK G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 16,548.76 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 19 8/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 14:35:45R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 19Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/26/20167/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 2,034.00HCI CHEMTEC INC PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 2,034.00 1,144.72HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER 1,144.72 45.00HEALTHPARTNERSHUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 157.00HUMAN RESOURCES RECRUITMENT 202.00 1.00HEARTH & HOME TECHNOLOGIES INSPECTIONS G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 65.00INSPECTIONS G & A MECHANICAL 66.00 324.00HEDBERG SUPPLY STORM WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT PARTS 324.00 878.51HELLERUD, JORDAN EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A TUITION 878.51 205.50HENDEL PLUMBING WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 205.50 688.50HENDERSON, TRACY SOFTBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 688.50 756.00HENNEPIN COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE DWI ENFORCEMENT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 756.00 550.00HENNEPIN COUNTY INFO TECH IT G & A COMPUTER SERVICES 550.00 71.50HENNEPIN COUNTY RESIDENT & REAL ESTATE ASSESSING G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 71.50 3,362.98HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER POLICE G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 3,421.43POLICE G & A SUBSISTENCE SERVICE 2,694.10OPERATIONSRADIO COMMUNICATIONS 4,633.40WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,633.40SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 20 8/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 14:35:45R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 20Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/26/20167/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 9,266.80STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 18,533.60PARK MAINTENANCE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 527.97PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE 47,073.68 85.00HINZ, EMILY INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 85.00 5.19HIRSHFIELDSFACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 5.19 468.92HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 16.19ROUTINE MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 26.82GRAFFITI CONTROL OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 46.53DAMAGE REPAIR SMALL TOOLS 400.76WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 361.01PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 335.37BEAUTIFICATION / FLOWERS OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 832.74REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES 255.15AQUATIC PARK G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 2,743.49 14.98HOME DEPOT CREDIT SRVCS WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 401.26WESTWOOD G & A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 416.24 18.68HOMQUIST, JILL WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 18.68 71.24HONDA TOWN GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 71.24 101.52HOPPE, MARK ASSESSING G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 101.52 357.00HORDYK, EVAN SOFTBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 357.00 6,292.08HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI AQUATIC PARK G & A OTHER 6,292.08 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 21 8/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 14:35:45R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 21Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/26/20167/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 100.74HORK & T GOODMAN, BETSY REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.74 3,597.69-HORWITZ INC PARK IMPROVE BALANCE SHEET RETAINED PERCENTAGE 71,953.75PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 68,356.06 400.00HOWES, JENNIFER SOFTBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 400.00 150.00HOWES, JESSICA VOLLEYBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 150.00KICKBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 300.00 50.00HOWES, KRISTINE KICKBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 204.00SOFTBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 254.00 225.00HUBER, JOHN M.GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 225.00 104.56HUNTER, MARY REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 104.56 1,496.00I.U.O.E. LOCAL NO 49 EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S UNION DUES 1,496.00 505.00I/O SOLUTIONS INC HUMAN RESOURCES RECRUITMENT 505.00 19.00IATNVEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 19.00 200.00IBRAHIM, MARYAN JOINT COMM POLICE PARTNERSHIP MEETING EXPENSE 200.00 395.00ICE SKATING INST AMERICA INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 395.00 306.25IDEAL SERVICE INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 22 8/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 14:35:45R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 22Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/26/20167/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 306.25 115.00IDENTISYSPOLICE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 115.00 773.95IMPACT PROVEN SOLUTIONS WATER UTILITY G&A POSTAGE 773.95SEWER UTILITY G&A POSTAGE 773.95SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS POSTAGE 773.96STORM WATER UTILITY G&A POSTAGE 3,095.81 2,449.41INDELCOWATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 371.57PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 2,820.98 380.00INGINA LLC ART OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 380.00 2,216.65INTEGRA TELECOM IT G & A TELEPHONE 2,216.65 1,190.81INVER GROVE FORD GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 549.29UNINSURED LOSS G&A UNINSURED LOSS 490.22GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 2,230.32 40.73INVESTORS CAPITAL WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 40.73 393.00IPMA-HR HUMAN RESOURCES SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 393.00 312.85I-STATE TRUCK CENTER GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 312.85 645.00IVERSON, CHRIS ENGINEERING G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 645.00 64.80J & F REDDY RENTS WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 64.80 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 23 8/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 14:35:45R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 23Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/26/20167/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 192.70JEFFERSON FIRE & SAFETY INC OPERATIONS PROTECTIVE CLOTHING 16,776.16OPERATIONSOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 16,968.86 14.72JERRY'S HARDWARE POLICE G & A BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 43.65WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT PARTS 6.44SEWER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT PARTS 66.24PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 61.83PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 192.88 879.00JESSEN PRESS INC COMM & MARKETING G & A PRINTING & PUBLISHING 879.00 200.00JIBUNOR, ANN JOINT COMM POLICE PARTNERSHIP MEETING EXPENSE 200.00 40.13JMW INVESTMENTS LLC WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 40.13 1,122.00JOHANSEN, MICHAEL SOFTBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,122.00 11.46JOHNSON, BLAKE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 11.46 200.00JOHNSON, DEREK GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 200.00 101.66JOHNSON, JERRY REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 101.66 250.00JOHNSON, SUSAN KICKBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 250.00 210.00JONAS, BLAIR WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 210.00 29.91JUSTIN, ADAM WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 29.91 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 24 8/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 14:35:45R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 24Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/26/20167/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 1.00JZ ELECTRIC INSPECTIONS G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 90.00INSPECTIONS G & A ELECTRICAL 91.00 503.08KELLER, JASMINE Z EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S WAGE GARNISHMENTS 503.08 89.43KELLOGG, JIM REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 89.43 228.00KENNEDY & GRAVEN ESCROWS ELIOT PARK 228.00 76.28KENNEDY, BEVERLY REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 76.28 1,104.00KIDCREATE STUDIO ART OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,104.00 1,160.00KIDS TEAM TENNIS LLC TENNIS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,160.00 128.85KIEFER SWIM PRODUCTS AQUATIC PARK G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 128.85 2,131.52KILLMER ELECTRIC CO INC PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 383.64REFORESTATIONOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,515.16 21,311.26KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 21,311.26 100.00KOCH, NICHOLAS WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 100.00 377.75KOSALKO, JONNA NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 377.75 3,703.65KRECH, O'BRIEN, MUELLER & WASS INC MUNICIPAL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 3,703.65 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 25 8/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 14:35:45R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 25Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/26/20167/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 619.75KRISS PREMIUM PRODUCTS INC REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES 619.75 143.76KRUGE-AIR INC BLDG/GROUNDS OPS & MAINT BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 143.76 153.00KUBES, JON SOFTBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 153.00 1,506.00KUSTOM SIGNALS INC POLICE G & A POLICE EQUIPMENT 1,506.00 260.64LAKES GAS CO PATCHING-PERMANENT OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 45.70PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 306.34 22.88LARSON, DAVID WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 22.88 653.45LARSON, JH CO FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 30.50WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 683.95 2,751.10LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES INC EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S UNION DUES 2,751.10 124.78LAW ENFORCEMENT TARGETS INC POLICE G & A POLICE EQUIPMENT 124.78 53.20LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES ADMINISTRATION G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 53.20 30.00LEAGUE OF MN CITIES CLERICAL TRAINING 30.00 3,187.88LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INSURANCE TRUST UNINSURED LOSS G&A UNINSURED LOSS 3,187.88 685.95LEAP MANUFACTURING LLC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 685.95 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 26 8/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 14:35:45R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 26Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/26/20167/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 74.29LEE, JON REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 74.29 325.00LEGACY CREATIVE IMAGES FABULOUS FRIDAYS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 325.00 5,900.00LEOTEK ELECTRONICS USA LLC PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 5,900.00 548.80LIBERTY ENVELOPE COMM & MARKETING G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 548.80 3,955.00LIFESAVER FIRE PROTECTION PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 3,955.00 3,669.28LINAEMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A LONG TERM DISABILITY 3,669.28 487.50LINDSTROM, BRENT GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 487.50 81.94LIPSCHULTZ, ELLEN REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 81.94 124.80LITIN PAPER, PACKAGING & CONVERTING POLICE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 332.32SOLID WASTE G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 457.12 740.65LOCKGUARD INC REC CENTER BUILDING BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 740.65 2,104.96LOCKRIDGE GRINDAL NAUEN PLLP REILLY G & A LEGAL SERVICES 2,104.96 2,092.60LOFFLER COMPANIES IT G & A OFFICE EQUIPMENT 2,092.60 35,481.66LOGISIT G & A COMPUTER SERVICES 11,667.50TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 47,149.16 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 27 8/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 14:35:45R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 27Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/26/20167/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 2,533.50LUBE-TECH & PARTNERS LLC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 2,533.50 2,558.51LUCAS PHOTOGRAPHY, STEVE OPERATIONS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 2,558.51 71.82LYNCH, DEBRA ASSESSING G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 71.82 85.00MACGREGOR-HANNAH, MARON INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 85.00 113.50MACQUEEN EQUIP CO GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 4,825.00SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 171.30GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES 5,109.80 16,955.31MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 16,955.31 30.68MAPLE BANK WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 30.68 350.00MARSHALL, ADAM PERFORMING ARTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 350.00 50.40MARTENS, AFTON JOINT COMM POLICE PARTNERSHIP OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 50.40 140.00MASTER TECHNOLOGY GROUP TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 140.00 91.41MCCASHIN, BRENDAN REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 91.41 34.93MCGITY, CHARLES WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 34.93 49.03MCHUGH, JOHN T CABLE TV G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 367.89CABLE TV G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 416.92 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 28 8/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 14:35:45R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 28Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/26/20167/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 69.65MCMONIGAL, MEG COMM DEV PLANNING G & A MEETING EXPENSE 69.65 76.28MCQUILLAN, BARB REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 76.28 6,060.00MEDORA CORP WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 6,060.00 1.00MENARDSDAMAGE REPAIR SMALL TOOLS 24.99DAMAGE REPAIR OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 26.01SYSTEM REPAIR OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 26.98INSTALLATIONSMALL TOOLS 89.90FABRICATIONOTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 121.25PAINTINGOTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 161.87WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 89.90PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 337.35WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 45.25SUMMER CAMP GENERAL SUPPLIES 924.50 16,103.84METHODIST HOSPITAL SEWER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 16,103.84 561.23METRO, MICHAEL OPERATIONS GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 561.23 154,989.45METROPOLITAN COUNCIL INSPECTIONS G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 348,097.01OPERATIONSCLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 503,086.46 105.32MEYER, RODNEY REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 105.32 938.00MHSRC/RANGE POLICE G & A TRAINING 938.00 265.89MICRO CENTER PUBLIC WORKS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 179.97WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 445.86 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 29 8/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 14:35:45R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 29Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/26/20167/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 950.70MIDWEST BADGE & NOVELTY CO SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS PRINTING & PUBLISHING 950.70 4,870.22MILLER DUNWIDDIE ARCHITECTURE PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,870.22 42,593.28MINGER CONSTRUCTION INC CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 42,593.28 150.00MINIKAHDA OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 150.00 1,076.40MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPT PAWN FEES OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,076.40 39.00MINNEAPOLIS WINDOW SHADE CO FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 39.00 153.07MINNESOTA BENEFIT ASSOC EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S ACCRUED OTHER BENEFITS 153.07 415.00MINNESOTA BUREAU CRIMINAL APPREHENSION POLICE G & A TRAINING 415.00 147.66MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PYT CTR EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S WAGE GARNISHMENTS 147.66 40.00MINNESOTA DEPT HEALTH WATER UTILITY G&A LICENSES 50.00REILLY BUDGET LICENSES 90.00 15,860.38MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 15,860.38 500.00MINNESOTA RURAL WATER ASSOC WATER UTILITY G&A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 500.00 615.95MINNESOTA SAFETY COUNCIL OPERATIONS EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 615.95 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 30 8/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 14:35:45R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 30Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/26/20167/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 445.00MINNESOTA TWINS HUMAN RESOURCES CITE 445.00 100.00MINUTEMAN PRESS COMM & MARKETING G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 100.00 28.52MINVALCO INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 28.52 2,840.05MIRACLE RECREATION EQUIPMENT INC PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT MAINTENAN OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 2,840.05 275.00MOHR, MARVIN GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 275.00 340.00MRA-THE MANAGEMENT ASSOC HUMAN RESOURCES SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 340.00 20.00MRPAORGANIZED REC G & A TRAINING 2,728.00SOFTBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,748.00 1,155.62MTI DISTRIBUTING CO GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 1,155.62 901.75MYKLEBUST, JOHN CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 901.75 779.85NAPA (GENUINE PARTS CO)GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 97.02ROUTINE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT PARTS 8.64WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT PARTS 46.40ORGANIZED REC G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 369.71VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 31.54GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,333.16 37.64NATHAN, CHRISTOPHER WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 37.64 379.40ND CHILD SUPPORT DIVISION EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S WAGE GARNISHMENTS 379.40 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 31 8/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 14:35:45R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 31Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/26/20167/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 101.77NEP CORP GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES 101.77 1,275.00NEUMANN, NEAL SOFTBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,275.00 10.00NEW HORIZON ACADEMY COON RAPIDS OAK HILL SPLASH PAD PROGRAM REVENUE 10.00 104.95NOKOMIS SHOE SHOP INSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 104.95 27.09NORBERG, BRANDON WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 27.09 2,500.00NOR-SON INC.ESCROWS DEMO / BROOKSIDE TRAFFIC 2,500.00 757.20NORTH AMERICAN SAFETY INC PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 757.20 1,837.40NORTHERN AIRE SWIMMING POOLS SPLASH PAD MAINT - Oak Hill Pk GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,837.40 994.70NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 994.70 4,719.00-NORTHLAND CONCRETE & MASONRY COMPANY PARK IMPROVE BALANCE SHEET RETAINED PERCENTAGE 94,380.00PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 89,661.00 3,930.52NORTHLAND MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 3,930.52 25.00NORTHSTAR CHAPTER APA HEALTH IN THE PARK INITIATIVE SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 25.00 500.00OAK KNOLL ANIMAL HOSPITAL POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 500.00 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 32 8/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 14:35:45R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 32Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/26/20167/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 225.00OBERT, WILLIAM GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 225.00 102.20OFFICE DEPOT ADMINISTRATION G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 247.52ADMINISTRATION G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 36.78HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICE SUPPLIES 787.26COMM & MARKETING G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 150.00COMM & MARKETING G & A PRINTING & PUBLISHING 129.99FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 270.06POLICE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 22.62POLICE G & A OFFICE EQUIPMENT 206.99OPERATIONSOFFICE SUPPLIES 333.95INSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 156.20PUBLIC WORKS G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 465.70POLICE & FIRE PENSION G&A MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENT 69.93SOLID WASTE G&A OFFICE SUPPLIES 211.99ORGANIZED REC G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 66.52WESTWOOD G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 3,257.71 294.51OLSEN CHAIN & CABLE CO INC PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 294.51 1,201.60OMAHA PAPER COMPANY INC PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,201.60 1,500.00O'MALLY, KAITLYN ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 1,500.00 212.00ON SITE SANITATION NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,293.50FIELD MAINT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 103.50ICE RENTAL NON-TAXABLE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,609.00 204.00OPOKU, MICHAEL SOFTBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 204.00 285.66OXYGEN SERVICE COMPANY INC OPERATIONS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 285.66 592.25PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES INC REILLY BUDGET OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 33 8/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 14:35:45R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 33Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/26/20167/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 592.25 1,250.00PAN-HANDLERS STEEL DRUM BAND PERFORMING ARTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,250.00 20.52PARK CHRYSLER JEEP UNINSURED LOSS G&A UNINSURED LOSS 20.52 30,729.84-PARK CONSTRUCTION CO STREET CAPITAL PROJ BAL SHEET RETAINED PERCENTAGE 645,087.09CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 614,357.25 24.00PARK NICOLLET CLINIC HSM HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 24.00 843.24PARK TAVERN PLAYGROUNDS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 843.24 400.00PARK THEATER COMPANY PERFORMING ARTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 400.00 65.99PARKER, JON POLICE G & A POLICE EQUIPMENT 65.99 205.18PATRICK, MICHEAL WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 205.18 98,134.92PATROL PC POLICE & FIRE PENSION G&A MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENT 98,134.92 160.07PATTERSON, ALEXANDER WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 160.07 91.41PEILEN, BRUCE REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 91.41 5,750.00PERNSTEINER CREATIVE GROUP INC COMM & MARKETING G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 518.75WATER UTILITY G&A ADVERTISING 518.75SOLID WASTE G&A ADVERTISING 1,037.50STORM WATER UTILITY G&A ADVERTISING 7,825.00 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 34 8/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 14:35:45R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 34Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/26/20167/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 5,000.00PERSPECTIVES INC.ESCROWS DEMO / BROOKSIDE TRAFFIC 5,000.00 6.98PETTY CASH HUMAN RESOURCES CITE 1.76COMM & MARKETING G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 20.00FINANCE G & A TRAVEL/MEETINGS 25.15FINANCE G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 8.00POLICE G & A TRAVEL/MEETINGS 30.00INSPECTIONS G & A MEETING EXPENSE 6.84PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 5.00PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A EQUIPMENT PARTS 23.00PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 12.00PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 10.00PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A LICENSES 24.25WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 25.95WATER UTILITY G&A POSTAGE 19.00WATER UTILITY G&A LICENSES 14.13SOLID WASTE G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 151.50VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A LICENSES 383.56 3,283.03PFM ASSET MANAGEMENT CITY POOLED INVESTMENTS BANK CHARGES/CREDIT CD FEES 3,283.03 320.11PHILIP'S TREE CARE INC SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 320.11 1,304.52PLASTIC BAGMART REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,304.52 1,561.02POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 1,561.02 131.00POPP.COM INC PARK MAINTENANCE G & A TELEPHONE 131.00 90.00POST BOARD POLICE G & A LICENSES 90.00 389.80POWERPLAN OIB PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 35 8/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 14:35:45R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 35Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/26/20167/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 389.80 1,837.50PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 1,837.50 218.43PRECISE MRM LLC PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENT 153.19WATER UTILITY G&A MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENT 153.19SEWER UTILITY G&A MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENT 153.19STORM WATER UTILITY G&A MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENT 678.00 95.24PREMIUM WATERS INC OPERATIONS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 95.24 200.00PRO AUTO DETAILING GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 660.00PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 860.00 13,377.86PUMP & METER SERVICE BLDG/GROUNDS OPS & MAINT BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 13,377.86 440.00Q3 CONTRACTING WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 4,734.50STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 5,174.50 2,168.75QUARVE-PETERSON INC, JULEE ENGINEERING G & A ENGINEERING SERVICES 2,168.75 21.19QUICKSILVER EXPRESS COURIER HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL SUPPLIES 53.98VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A POSTAGE 75.17 14,043.75-RACHEL CONTRACTING INC PARK IMPROVE BALANCE SHEET RETAINED PERCENTAGE 280,875.00PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 266,831.25 1,964.70RAINBOW TREECARE BEAUTIFICATION / FLOWERS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,964.70 392.25-RAM CONSTRUCTION SERVICES OF MINNESOTA PARK IMPROVE BALANCE SHEET RETAINED PERCENTAGE 7,845.00PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 36 8/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 14:35:45R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 36Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/26/20167/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 7,452.75 3,066.04RANDY'S SANITATION INC FACILITY OPERATIONS GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE 1,690.81REC CENTER BUILDING GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE 4,756.85 42.33RECREATION SUPPLY CO AQUATIC PARK G & A MAINTENANCE 42.33 42.53RECREONICS ETAL AQUATIC PARK G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 42.53 200.00RED WING SHOE STORE WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 200.00 28,860.00REDPATH & COMPANY FINANCE G & A AUDITING AND ACCOUNTING SERVIC 481.00CABLE TV G & A AUDITING AND ACCOUNTING SERVIC 1,443.00HOUSING REHAB G & A AUDITING AND ACCOUNTING SERVIC 4,810.00WATER UTILITY G&A AUDITING AND ACCOUNTING SERVIC 5,772.00SEWER UTILITY G&A AUDITING AND ACCOUNTING SERVIC 2,886.00SOLID WASTE G&A AUDITING AND ACCOUNTING SERVIC 1,924.00STORM WATER UTILITY G&A AUDITING AND ACCOUNTING SERVIC 46,176.00 13.04REGENCY OFFICE PRODUCTS LLC COMMUNITY OUTREACH G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 164.35POLICE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 177.39 15,830.50REHRIG PACIFIC CO SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS OTHER 15,830.50 18.03REINDERS INC TREE MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 18.03 90.00RIBEIRO, ANA C B FREIRE INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 90.00 5,632.11RICOH USA INC IT G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 5,632.11 487.50RIDER, JAMES & ELAINE GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 37 8/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 14:35:45R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 37Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/26/20167/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 487.50 6,265.00RIGHTMARK ROOTER LLC SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 6,265.00 98,280.67RJM CONSTRUCTION LLC PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 98,280.67 231.40RMR SERVICES WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 231.40 140.60ROAD MACHINERY & SUPPLIES CO GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 140.60 252.00ROLLER GARDEN PLAYGROUNDS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 252.00 7,037.00RSP ARCHITECTS LTD PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 7,037.00 1.00RYAN PLUMBING & HEATING, GENZ INSPECTIONS G & A STATE SURCHARGE PAYABLE 50.00INSPECTIONS G & A MECHANICAL 51.00 32.25SALATA, RONALD WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 32.25 422.99SAM'S CLUB POLICE G & A TRAINING 81.15POLICE G & A MEETING EXPENSE 265.81NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 61.16OPERATIONSGENERAL SUPPLIES 148.28PLAYGROUNDSGENERAL SUPPLIES 1,335.51FABULOUS FRIDAYS GENERAL SUPPLIES 2,749.95CONCESSIONSCONCESSION SUPPLIES 5,064.85 1,050.00SARAH GRACE PHOTOGRAPHY COMM & MARKETING G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,050.00 149.70SCHAAKE COMPANY, AJ HUMAN RESOURCES RECOGNITION 149.70 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 38 8/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 14:35:45R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 38Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/26/20167/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 230.00SCHMICKLE, JASON INSPECTIONS G & A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE 230.00 74.52SCHOMER, KELLEY ASSESSING G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 74.52 180.00SCHUMACHER, TIM WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 180.00 399.00SEARLE, HUGO OPERATIONS TRAINING 399.00 13,379.12SEHESCROWSGENERAL 10,513.35STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 23,892.47 66.04SENEVIRATNE, SHEREEN LEONTIA WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 66.04 61.03SHRED-IT USA MINNEAPOLIS ADMINISTRATION G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 11.77FINANCE G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 63.26POLICE G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 12.65WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 148.71 649.37SIMPLEXGRINNELL LP FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 649.37 79.95SINKULA, STEVEN REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 79.95 90.43SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 90.43 200.00SIYAD, FAHMO JOINT COMM POLICE PARTNERSHIP MEETING EXPENSE 200.00 51.12SKALLET, DAVID INSPECTIONS G & A TRAINING 51.12 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 39 8/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 14:35:45R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 39Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/26/20167/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 1,066.66SKELLY, GABRIEL NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,066.66 1,287.16SLP FF ASSOC IAFF LOCAL #993 EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S UNION DUES 1,287.16 1,006.22SMITH, LAURA EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A TUITION 1,006.22 212.50SMITH, PHILLIP GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 212.50 242.42SNOOK, TOM & ANDREA REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 242.42 95.00SORENSEN, PATRICIA WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 95.00 1,743.77SPRINTIT G & A DATACOMMUNICATIONS 3,559.82CELLPHONES, IPADS, ETC.OFFICE EQUIPMENT 5,303.59 305.57SPS COMPANIES INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 305.57 1,664.51SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC ESCROWS GENERAL 1,664.51 1,211.00ST CROIX REC CO FACILITIES MCTE G & A OTHER 1,211.00 229.00ST PAUL, CITY OF SUPPORT SERVICES TRAINING 229.00 194.48STAR TRIBUNE ADMINISTRATION G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 37.90SOLID WASTE G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 232.38 2,399.29STEVENS ENGINEERS INC PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,399.29 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 40 8/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 14:35:45R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 40Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/26/20167/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 1,800.00STONEBROOK FENCE INC CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,800.00 681.00STONEBROOKE EQUIPMENT INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 681.00 463.92STREICHER'S POLICE G & A POLICE EQUIPMENT 75.98OPERATIONSUNIFORMS 6,980.99POLICE & FIRE PENSION G&A MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENT 199.98SEWER UTILITY G&A SMALL TOOLS 7,720.87 17.51SUBURBAN GM PARTS UNINSURED LOSS G&A UNINSURED LOSS 17.51 708.33SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY WATER UTILITY G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 708.34SEWER UTILITY G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 708.33STORM WATER UTILITY G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 2,125.00 108.00SUMMIT COMPANIES FACILITIES MCTE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 314.00VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 422.00 807.50SUMMIT ENVIROSOLUTIONS INC STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50,407.75REILLY BUDGET GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 51,215.25 816.25SUNBELT RENTALS INC REC CENTER BUILDING BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 666.25REC CENTER BUILDING BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 1,482.50 137.67SUNDBERG AMERICA FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 137.67 5,672.23SUNNYSIDE GARDENS CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,672.23 8,465.84-SUNRAM CONSTRUCTION INC STREET CAPITAL PROJ BAL SHEET RETAINED PERCENTAGE 169,316.74CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 160,850.90 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 41 8/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 14:35:45R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 41Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/26/20167/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 5,001.04SWEEN COMPANY, EA CONCESSIONS CONCESSION SUPPLIES 5,001.04 97.99SWENSON JR, GEORGE REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 97.99 11,442.72SYSCO-MINNESOTA INC CONCESSIONS CONCESSION SUPPLIES 11,442.72 25.80TELELANGUAGE INC ADMINISTRATION G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 25.80 114.95TEMPLE, ALENA NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 114.95 247.10TENNANT SALES AND SERVICE CO.VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 280.56GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 527.66 23.50TERMINIX INT REC CENTER BUILDING BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 23.50 620.00TERRAMAX INC PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 620.00 46.70TERRY, MATT PLAYGROUNDS GENERAL SUPPLIES 388.80PLAYGROUNDSMILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 435.50 393.50THE SAFARILAND GROUP ERU OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 393.50 9.65THOMSON REUTERS WEST PAYMENT CENTER HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL SUPPLIES 230.16POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 239.81 500.00TIGER OAK PUBLICATIONS COMM & MARKETING G & A ADVERTISING 500.00 950.00TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL ADMINISTRATION G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 42 8/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 14:35:45R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 42Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/26/20167/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 950.00 47,523.64TNC INDUSTRIES INC MUNICIPAL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 47,523.64 85.17TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 85.17 4,520.65TOPPERS AND MORE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 4,520.65 922.39TOWMASTERGENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 922.39 995.00TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE INC UNINSURED LOSS G&A UNINSURED LOSS 995.00 750.00TRAFFIC DATA INC ENGINEERING G & A ENGINEERING SERVICES 750.00 306.00TRAUTMANN, JOHN SOFTBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 306.00 18,259.62TREE TRUST REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 15,278.47CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 33,538.09 1,155.91TRI STATE BOBCAT GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 1,155.91 1,300.00TUBE PRO INC AQUATIC PARK G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,300.00 1,475.00TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 1,475.00 770.46TWIN CITY HARDWARE PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 770.46 1,744.00U.S. CONFERENCE OF MAYORS ADMINISTRATION G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 1,744.00 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 43 8/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 14:35:45R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 43Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/26/20167/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 859.00UHL CO INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 621.00FACILITIES MCTE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 899.10POLICE G & A REPAIRS 8,557.00PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 6,757.25PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 6,893.00TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 24,586.35 43.31ULINEGENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 43.31 520.15UNIFORMS UNLIMITED (PD)POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 857.84SUPPORT SERVICES OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 2,034.51SUPERVISORYOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 2,598.45PATROLOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 289.50EXPLORERSOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 20.89COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 6,321.34 316.00UNITED WAY OF MINNEAPOLIS AREA EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S UNITED WAY 316.00 500.00UNIVERSAL CLEANING SERVICES INC SPEC ASSMT CONSTRUCTION OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 500.00 550.00UPENS, IVARS GUNARS VOLLEYBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 550.00 89.29UPS STORE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A POSTAGE 89.29 453.95VAIL, LORI HUMAN RESOURCES RECOGNITION 453.95 30,022.06VALLEY PAVING INC STREET CAPITAL PROJ BAL SHEET RETAINED PERCENTAGE 30,022.06 89.10VAUGHAN, JIM NATURAL RESOURCES G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 89.10 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 44 8/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 14:35:45R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 44Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/26/20167/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 948.50-VEIT & CO PARK IMPROVE BALANCE SHEET RETAINED PERCENTAGE 18,970.00PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 18,021.50 20.00VERIFIED CREDENTIALS HUMAN RESOURCES RECRUITMENT 20.00 50.04VERIZON WIRELESS SEWER UTILITY G&A TELEPHONE 11,973.94CELLPHONES, IPADS, ETC.OFFICE EQUIPMENT 70.22CELLPHONES, IPADS, ETC.TELEPHONE 12,094.20 363.21VIKING INDUSTRIAL CTR ENGINEERING G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 121.07WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 484.28 51.00VINCO INC INSPECTIONS G & A ELECTRICAL 51.00 7,613.47VISUAL IMPACT LLC SSD #5 G&A OTHER 7,613.47 11,552.54-VISU-SEWER INC STREET CAPITAL PROJ BAL SHEET RETAINED PERCENTAGE 231,050.75CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 219,498.21 3,901.48VOICE AND DATA NETWORKS TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 3,901.48 296.00VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS' BENEFIT ASSN MN OPERATIONS SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 296.00 820.00WARNING LITES OF MN INC CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 820.00 4,430.04-WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN SOLID WASTE G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 133,037.29SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE 66,090.61SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS RECYCLING SERVICE 68,968.35SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE 263,666.21 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 45 8/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 14:35:45R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 45Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/26/20167/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 271.60WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 271.60 305.00WEBBER RECREATIONAL DESIGN PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT MAINTENAN GENERAL SUPPLIES 305.00 506.75WEIGAND, KATHRYN TREE MAINTENANCE TREE MAINTENANCE 506.75 203.67WEILAND ELIZABETH WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 203.67 274.62WENTZEL CHRISTOPHER WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 274.62 86.68WESTWOOD HILLS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 86.68 240.55WEXLER HAROLD WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 240.55 175.00WEXLER, RACHEL GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 175.00 440.43WITMER PUBLIC SAFETY GROUP INC OPERATIONS SMALL TOOLS 137.76OPERATIONSPROTECTIVE CLOTHING 578.19 50.38WOLFE PARK NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 50.38 517.77WP & RS MARS COMPANY PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 517.77 57.00WRAP CITY GRAPHICS FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 320.00CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 169.00NATURAL RESOURCES G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 546.00 68,558.75WSB ASSOC INC STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 250.00TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 46 8/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 14:35:45R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 46Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/26/20167/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 68,808.75 117.77WUOLLET, DEAN WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 117.77 1,219.79WYATT, LISA NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,219.79 34,907.05XCEL ENERGY FACILITIES MCTE G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE 24.24OPERATIONSEMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 21,908.29PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE 36,569.82WATER UTILITY G&A ELECTRIC SERVICE 1,840.36REILLY BUDGET ELECTRIC SERVICE 6,973.90SEWER UTILITY G&A ELECTRIC SERVICE 1,941.09STORM WATER UTILITY G&A ELECTRIC SERVICE 12,589.77PARK MAINTENANCE G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE 24.67BRICK HOUSE (1324)ELECTRIC SERVICE 116.04WW RENTAL HOUSE (1322)ELECTRIC SERVICE 704.15WESTWOOD G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE 18,762.68REC CENTER BUILDING ELECTRIC SERVICE 136,362.06 7,200.00XEROX BUSINESS SERVICES LLC TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 7,200.00 20.49YOUNG, ROBERT WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 20.49 6,010.00YTS COMPANIES LLC PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT MAINTENAN OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 3,842.00TREE DISEASE PRIVATE CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 3,150.00TREE DISEASE PUBLIC CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 13,002.00 31.85ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 17.60WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 19.15PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 255.35REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES 92.10VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 416.05 28.08ZEMBRYKI, MARK WESTWOOD G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 47 8/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 14:35:45R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 47Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/26/20167/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 28.08 828.17ZIEGLER INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 920.84GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 1,749.01 450.00ZINGHOPPERS GROUP LLC PERFORMING ARTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 450.00 124.66ZIP PRINTING COMM & MARKETING G & A PRINTING & PUBLISHING 124.66 57,162.00ZUERCHER TECHNOLOGIES LLC IT G & A COMPUTER SERVICES 24,292.80E-911 PROGRAM COMPUTER SERVICES 81,454.80 Report Totals 5,667,794.29 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 48 Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: September 6, 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Minor Amendment to Parkdale Center RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution Amending and Restating the Special Use Permit for 5100 Gamble Drive. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does City Council support the minor amendment to the 5100 Gamble Drive special permit? SUMMARY: Excelsior Group has submitted an application for a Minor Amendment to a Special Permit for the property located at 5100 Gamble Drive. The building is one of four included in the Parkdale office development and is referred to as Parkdale Center. Parkdale Center is a 7-story, multi-tenant office building with a large HealthPartners clinic and two office tenants. These tenants occupy only 30% of the building and the rest remains vacant. The applicant has described this vacancy as a result of its outdated appearance, lack of renovation to the interior of the building, and floor plans that are oddly subdivided and configured. The applicant proposes to renovate both the interior and exterior of the building to become more energy efficient and reduce vacancy. The applicant is also rebranding the building to “West End Center”. The scope of redevelopment work includes replacement of all windows and frames, replacement of sections of brick cladding with a glass curtainwall system, removal of a two-story pedestrian staircase at the west entrance of the building, creation of a plaza seating space near the west entrance of the building, installation of a new electronic management system, and renovations to the interior layout of the building. The proposed request is being processed as a Minor Amendment to a Special Use Permit because the changes are not anticipated to have any negative off-site impacts and the proposed changes meet all City Code requirements. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion Resolution Development Plans Prepared by: Nicole Mardell, Associate Planner Reviewed by: Sean Walther, Planning and Zoning Supervisor Approved by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director Consent Agenda Item: 4b City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4b) Page 2 Title: Minor Amendment to Parkdale Center DISCUSSION BACKGROUND: In 1992, a resolution by City Council granted a special (conditional use) permit to allow for an increase in the net floor area by 15,000 square feet and increase in parking for 5100 Gamble Drive. As a condition of approval the site must be developed in accordance with the official exhibits provided with the original construction. The work to be done will adjust these official exhibits but will not add additional square footage. As such, the changes are considered to be a minor amendment and does not require a public hearing. Below is a list and more detailed description of the changes requested by the applicant compared to the previously approved plan. Removal of West Entrance Staircase: Parkdale Center currently has a two-story pedestrian staircase on the west side of the building. This staircase provides entry to the building’s second floor, and cuts off all access to the ground level. The staircase is not ADA accessible and is not needed based on the grade of the west side of the building. The applicant is proposing to remove this staircase in order to allow better access to the building through the ground floor level. Addition of West Entrance Patio: In place of the staircase, the applicant is proposing to construct a paved patio with seating and landscaping planters. This patio will activate the front entrance and allow for seating for tenant employees and guests. Additional on-site parking: The removal of the west pedestrian staircase will allow for more space in the west surface parking lot. The applicant is proposing to reconfigure the 12 existing parking spaces and provide an additional 11 parking spaces. These additional spaces will be closer to the building’s entrance and provide greater ADA accessibility. Façade Improvement and Interior Work: The building’s current façade is almost exclusively stucco with some glass elements. The applicant is proposing replacement of all windows and frames, and replacement of sections of brick cladding with a glass curtainwall system. The interior of the building will be reconfigured to from defined tenant spaces to an open floor plan. The building will also install a new electronic management system for better energy use. CONCLUSION: The plan revisions proposed in the minor amendment to the special use permit meet all City Code requirements. The revisions provide modest improvements to the site and no negative off-site impacts are anticipated from these changes. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4b) Page 3 Title: Minor Amendment to Parkdale Center RESOLUTION NO. 16-____ RESOLUTION AMENDING AND RESTATING RESOLUTION NO. 92-46 RELATED TO A SPECIAL (CONDITIONAL USE) PERMIT FOR THE PARKDALE CENTER OFFICE BUILDING LOCATED AT 5100 GAMBLE DRIVE WHEREAS, West End Office LLC, owner of the land, has submitted an application for approval of a Minor Amendment to a Special Permit for the property located at 5100 Gamble Drive and legally described as: Registered Land Survey No.1647 Hennepin County, Minnesota Tract A, RLS No. 1647 Also SLY 49 Ft of Tract C RLS No.1599. WHEREAS, the city council considered the effect of the proposed amendment on the health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect of the use of the Comprehensive Plan; and compliance with the intent of the Zoning Ordinance. WHEREAS, the Special Permit approved regarding the subject property pursuant to Resolution No. 92- 46 of the City of St. Louis Park City Council dated April 20, 1992 contained conditions applicable to said property in this resolution; and WHEREAS, due to changed circumstances, amendments to those conditions are now necessary requiring the amendment of the Special Permit. WHEREAS, it is the intent of this resolution to continue and restate the conditions of the Special Permit granted by Resolution No. 92-46, to add the amendments now required, and to consolidate all conditions applicable to the subject property in this resolution; and WHEREAS, the contents of Planning Case File 16-20-SP are hereby entered into and made part of the public hearing and the record of decision for this case. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT 1) The minor amendment of Resolution No. 92-46 is hereby restated and amended by the City of St. Louis Park City Council as being in accord and conformity with all ordinances, city plans and regulations of the City of St. Louis Park, and the law of the State of Minnesota, provided, however, that this approval is made subject to the opinion of the city attorney and certification by the city clerk subject to the following conditions; a. The uses on the subject property are limited to office. b. The total gross floor area of the building shall be limited to 192,000 gross square feet. c. The applicant shall amend the Official Exhibits. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4b) Page 4 Title: Minor Amendment to Parkdale Center d. The applicant shall be responsible to obtain all permits from the City and other agencies. e. Sign permits are required for new building signage. 2) The Special Use Permit shall be amended (Case No. 16-30-SP on September 6, 2016 to incorporate all of the preceding conditions and add the following conditions: a. The Official Exhibits be amended to include the minor changes proposed in regard to landscaping, façade materials, and number of parking stalls for 5100 Gamble Drive. b. The Official Exhibits be signed prior to issuance of the building permit. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council September 6, 2016 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk WEST ENTRYFFE = 901.50Utica Ave SEXISTING CONDITIONSProject No.Revisions1220 Marshall Street NEMinneapolisMinnesota 55413-1036612.677.7100612.677.7499 faxwww.rsparch.comRSP ArchitectsCertificationProjectForI hereby certify that this plan, specification or report wasprepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I ama duly licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.DateRegistration NumberSignatureDrawn ByChecked ByDateConsultants2016-062.1K. BIVERJ. LARSON07/30/2016No. Date Description1 08/31/2015STORMWATER BMPs2 09/15/2015CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS08/04/201644628NOTICE: The designs shown and described hereinincluding all technical drawings, graphics, and modelsthereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicatedor commercially exploited, in whole or in part, withoutexpress written permission of RSP Architects. These areavailable for limited review and evaluation by clients,consultants, contractors, government agencies, vendorsand office personnel only in accordance with this Notice.© Copyright RSP Architects 2015. All rights reserved.West End Office Park:West End CenterCONSTRUCTIONDOCUMENTS8/4/1610025 Valley View RoadSuite 140, Eden PrairieMinnesota 55344952.646.0236952.646.0290 faxwww.evs-eng.comEVS, Inc.SCALEIN FEET010 20EXISTING CONDITIONS NOTESLEGEND1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION TAKEN FROM BOUNDARY ANDTOPOGRAPHY SURVEY PERFORMED BY EVS, INC., SAINT LOUIS PARK,MINNESOTA, EXPRESSLY FOR THIS PROJECT.2. UTILITY LOCATIONS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED PRIOR TO EXCAVATION /CONSTRUCTION. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE NOTED, THE ENGINEERSHOULD BE IMMEDIATELY NOTIFIED FOR RESOLUTION.3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HIRE THE SERVICES OF A UTILITY LOCATORCOMPANY TO LOCATE ALL PRIVATELY OWNED UTILITIES THAT MAY BEDISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS.CONSTRUCTION LIMITSMAJOR CONTOURMINOR CONTOURCURB AND GUTTERGAS LINESTORMWATERHYDRANTTELEPHONE VAULTBOLLARDLIGHT POSTSTORMWATER MANHOLESTORMWATER CATCH BASINSTORMWATER CURB INLETSIGNGAS METERSHRUBSTREESCONCRETE SIDEWALKLANDSCAPINGC110City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4b) Title: Minor Amendment to Parkdale CenterPage 5 WEST ENTRYFFE = 901.50Utica Ave SREMOVE BUILDING ENTRANCECONSTRUCTION LIMITSREMOVE AREA DRAINSRELOCATE LIGHT POLEREMOVE LIGHT POLE ANDHANDICAP PARKING SIGNFIELD VERIFY ROOFDRAIN. VERIFY LOCATIONAND ELEVATION.APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF4" PVC STORM LINETO BE FIELD VERIFIEDREMOVE AREA DRAINREMOVESTORMWATERMANHOLEREMOVE 12" RCPSTORMWATER LINEREMOVE 4" PVCSTORMWATER LINEREMOVE STRIPINGREMOVEPATIO TABLESAND SEATINGREMOVEPATIO TABLESAND SEATINGREMOVE ISLANDREMOVE BOLLARDPROTECT LIGHT POLEREMOVE STAIRSAND RAILINGSREMOVE STAIRSAND RAILINGSPROTECT EXISTINGPLANTINGSPROTECT TREESPROTECT TREESREMOVEROCK WALLDEMOLITION PLANProject No.Revisions1220 Marshall Street NEMinneapolisMinnesota 55413-1036612.677.7100612.677.7499 faxwww.rsparch.comRSP ArchitectsCertificationProjectForI hereby certify that this plan, specification or report wasprepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I ama duly licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.DateRegistration NumberSignatureDrawn ByChecked ByDateConsultants2016-062.1K. BIVERJ. LARSON07/30/2016No. Date Description1 08/31/2015STORMWATER BMPs2 09/15/2015CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS08/04/201644628NOTICE: The designs shown and described hereinincluding all technical drawings, graphics, and modelsthereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicatedor commercially exploited, in whole or in part, withoutexpress written permission of RSP Architects. These areavailable for limited review and evaluation by clients,consultants, contractors, government agencies, vendorsand office personnel only in accordance with this Notice.© Copyright RSP Architects 2015. All rights reserved.West End Office Park:West End CenterCONSTRUCTIONDOCUMENTS8/4/1610025 Valley View RoadSuite 140, Eden PrairieMinnesota 55344952.646.0236952.646.0290 faxwww.evs-eng.comEVS, Inc.SCALE IN FEET010 20PAVEMENT SAWCUTHAND RAILING REMOVALCURB & GUTTER REMOVALSTORM DRAIN PIPE REMOVALTREE REMOVALSTAIRS/STRUCTURE REMOVALCONCRETE SIDEWALK REMOVALPAVEMENT REMOVALLANDSCAPING REMOVALCONSTRUCTION LIMITSDEMOLITION NOTES1. VISIT THE SITE PRIOR TO BIDDING; BE FAMILIAR WITH ACTUAL.CONDITIONS IN THE FIELD. EXTRA COMPENSATION WILL NOT BEALLOWED FOR CONDITIONS WHICH COULD HAVE BEEN DETERMINED ORANTICIPATED BY EXAMINATION OF THE SITE, THE CONTRACT DRAWINGSAND THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE PERTAINING TO EXISTING SOILS.UTILITIES AND OTHER SITE CHARACTERISTICS.2. INSTALL ALL SILT FENCE, TREE PROTECTION FENCE, INLET PROTECTION,AND ROCK ENTRANCES PRIOR TO BEGINNING REMOVALS.3. MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE TO SITE AND PROTECT EXISTING VEGETATIONAND SITE FEATURES (CURBS, WALKS, PAVEMENTS, OVERHEAD ANDUNDERGROUND UTILITIES, SIGNAGE, FENCING, ROADWAYS, ETC.) WHICHARE TO REMAIN.4. UTILITY LOCATIONS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED PRIOR TO EXCAVATION /CONSTRUCTION. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE NOTED, THE ENGINEERSHOULD BE IMMEDIATELY NOTIFIED FOR RESOLUTION.5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HIRE THE SERVICES OF A UTILITY LOCATORCOMPANY TO LOCATE ALL PRIVATELY OWNED UTILITIES THAT MAY BEDISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS.6. PROVIDE STUMP REMOVAL FOR ALL TREES AND STUMPS TO BEREMOVED.7. PROVIDE FULL DEPTH CONCRETE SAWCUT AT LOCATIONS SHOWN ONTHE PLAN WHERE EXISTING PAVEMENT IS TO REMAIN IN PLACE.8. FOR ALL PRIVATE UTILITIES REQUIRING ABANDONMENT, REMOVAL, ORRELOCATION, CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WORK AND ANY OUTAGESWITH THE UTILITY PROVIDER.9. PAVEMENT MAY BE RECYCLED AND USED AS MnDOT CLASS 7STRUCTURAL FILL ON-SITE.10. ANY WELLS FOUND ON-SITE ARE TO BE CAPPED ACCORDING TO LOCAL,STATE, AND FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS.11. UTILITIES TO BE REMOVED AS NOTED.12. DEMOLISH & DISPOSE OF ALL BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, MATERIALS, &EQUIPMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERALREQUIREMENTS.13. SEE ELECTRICAL PLAN FOR SITE ELECTRICAL REMOVALS.14. REPAIR OR REPLACE EXISTING PROPERTY AND SITE FEATURES,INCLUDING GRASS AND VEGETATION, WHICH IS TO REMAIN THAT ISDAMAGED BY THE WORK. TO OWNER'S SATISFACTION AND AT NOADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER.15. LANDSCAPING REMOVALS INCLUDE MULCH, PLANTINGS, LANDSCAPINGROCK, SMALL BOULDERS, ETC.REMOVALS LEGENDC120City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4b) Title: Minor Amendment to Parkdale CenterPage 6 Utica Ave SPROPOSEDFFE=888.5018'9'42.5'24'5'7'21.9'9'24'CONSTRUCTION LIMITS1'10" TALL CONCRETEPLANTERSB618 C&GCONCRETE STAIRSPEDESTRIAN RAMPS180180150539086PEDESTRIAN RAMPPEDESTRIAN RAMP4" TALL CONCRETEPLANTERS3' TALL CONCRETEPLANTERCLEAN OUTR25' R49' R10' R2.5' R2.5'R10'R25'R49' R15' R2.5' R2.5'R9.5'R2'HANDICAP SIGNSADA PATH FROMRIGHT OF WAYProject No.Revisions1220 Marshall Street NEMinneapolisMinnesota 55413-1036612.677.7100612.677.7499 faxwww.rsparch.comRSP ArchitectsCertificationProjectForI hereby certify that this plan, specification or report wasprepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I ama duly licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.DateRegistration NumberSignatureDrawn ByChecked ByDateConsultants2016-062.1K. BIVERJ. LARSON07/30/2016No. Date Description1 08/31/2015STORMWATER BMPs2 09/15/2015CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS08/04/201644628NOTICE: The designs shown and described hereinincluding all technical drawings, graphics, and modelsthereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicatedor commercially exploited, in whole or in part, withoutexpress written permission of RSP Architects. These areavailable for limited review and evaluation by clients,consultants, contractors, government agencies, vendorsand office personnel only in accordance with this Notice.© Copyright RSP Architects 2015. All rights reserved.West End Office Park:West End CenterCONSTRUCTIONDOCUMENTS8/4/1610025 Valley View RoadSuite 140, Eden PrairieMinnesota 55344952.646.0236952.646.0290 faxwww.evs-eng.comEVS, Inc.SCALE IN FEET010 20LEGENDSITE PLAN NOTES1. DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CURB AND EXTERIOR FACE OF BUILDINGUNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.2. CONTRACTOR TO MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT SECTION FOR LOADINGAREA ALONG EXCELSIOR BOULEVARD.3. CONCRETE SUPPLIERS ARE REQUIRED TO HAUL CONCRETE WASTE ANDWASH OFF-SITE.SITE PLANC200GRADING LIMITSCURB & GUTTERSTRIPINGHANDICAP PARKING SIGNLIGHT POSTSTORMWATER BASINADA PATHCity Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4b) Title: Minor Amendment to Parkdale CenterPage 7 0+00 1+00 2+003+004+005+005+31 BP: 0+00.00PC: 1+48.07PT: 2+06.13 PC: 3+27.52PT: 3+85.70EP: 5+30.7487.91G.B.H.P.90.93H.P.90.7187.01L.P.0.50%0.50%5.00%5.00%5.00%5.00%2.93%PROPOSEDFFE=888.50Utica Ave S0.4%888889892890888 8888898918908908898918918928928908908918 9 1 8918918959008928938948968978988999011.0%1.0%2.0%2.0%890890 890890887887888888888888889889 88988 9891891891 891 892892890890889891891892892PROTECTTREESPROTECTTREES887.89891.69887.76889.81889.29891.45886.81890.67891.03890.85890.16890.06890.39890.83888.45888.50888.44888.30888.30888.30887.93888.14888.34888.30888.24888.13888.49888.28888.00C300Project No.Revisions1220 Marshall Street NEMinneapolisMinnesota 55413-1036612.677.7100612.677.7499 faxwww.rsparch.comRSP ArchitectsCertificationProjectForI hereby certify that this plan, specification or report wasprepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I ama duly licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.DateRegistration NumberSignatureDrawn ByChecked ByDateConsultants2016-062.1K. BIVERJ. LARSON07/30/2016No. Date Description1 08/31/2015STORMWATER BMPs2 09/15/2015CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS08/04/201644628NOTICE: The designs shown and described hereinincluding all technical drawings, graphics, and modelsthereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicatedor commercially exploited, in whole or in part, withoutexpress written permission of RSP Architects. These areavailable for limited review and evaluation by clients,consultants, contractors, government agencies, vendorsand office personnel only in accordance with this Notice.© Copyright RSP Architects 2015. All rights reserved.West End Office Park:West End CenterCONSTRUCTIONDOCUMENTS8/4/1610025 Valley View RoadSuite 140, Eden PrairieMinnesota 55344952.646.0236952.646.0290 faxwww.evs-eng.comEVS, Inc.SCALE IN FEET010 20GRADING AND EROSIONCONTROL PLANGRADING & PAVING NOTES1.SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS2. PROTECT ALL SURFACE SITE FEATURES NOT NOTED FOR REMOVAL.3. UTILITY LOCATIONS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED PRIOR TO EXCAVATION / CONSTRUCTION. IFANY DISCREPANCIES ARE NOTED, THE ENGINEER SHOULD BE IMMEDIATELY NOTIFIEDFOR RESOLUTION.4. EXISTING TREES NOTED FOR REMOVAL SHALL BE REMOVED IN THEIR ENTIRETY FROMTHE SITE, INCLUDING ROOT STRUCTURES. NO CLEARING EFFORTS SHALL BE STARTEDWITHOUT THE CAREFUL COORDINATION WITH THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE TOIDENTIFY TREES TO BE SAVED OR REMOVED.5. EXISTING ORGANIC MATERIAL (TOPSOIL) TO BE REMOVED PER GEOTECHNICALRECOMMENDATIONS FROM BUILDING AND PAVEMENT AREAS. SUITABLE EXISTINGMATERIALS MAY BE MINED FROM LANDSCAPE AREAS AND REPLACED WITH ORGANICMATERIAL.6. 42 INCH FENCE RAILING IS REQUIRED AT THE TOP OF ALL WALLS OVER 48 INCHES HIGH.7. THE FILL SOILS SHOULD BE PLACED AND COMPACTED USING LIFT THICKNESSES WHICHARE COMPARABLY MATCHED TO THE TYPE OF FILL AND THE COMPACTOR BEING USED.THE COMPACTOR SHOULD BE CAPABLE OF OBTAINING THE RECOMMENDEDCOMPACTION LEVELS THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE THICKNESS OF THE FILL LIFT.13. PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN AT CURBLINES ARE FLOWLINE ELEVATIONSUNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE.14. SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN AT CATCH BASINS ON THIS GRADING PLAN DOES NOTREFLECT 2 INCH CASTING SUMP AND ACTUAL RIM ELEVATIONS.LEGENDMAJOR CONTOURMINOR CONTOURGRADING EXTENTSCURB AND GUTTERSTORMWATER CATCH BASINSTORMWATER MANHOLEEROSION CONTROL BLANKETROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCETREE PROTECTIONINLET PROTECTIONCity Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4b) Title: Minor Amendment to Parkdale CenterPage 8 Utica Ave SCBMH-102RIM=886.62INV (S)=883.12CBMH-101RIM=887.36SUMP=877.51INV (N)=882.51INV (SE)=882.51INV (W)=881.51INV (SW)=882.51122'-12" RCP @ 0.50%EX-STRM-MHRIM=890.01SUMP=874.21INV (NE)=881.8764'-15" RCP @ 1.00%CBMH-103RIM=887.76INV (NW)=884.2644'-12 " RCP @ 4 .05%CO-104RIM=888.38INV (S)=881.5190° Bend60'-12" PERF. HDPE @ 0.00%6'-12" HDPE @ 0.00%INSTALL ADS ENVIROHOODOR APPROVED EQUALOVER HDPE PIPE INVERT.PERFORATED UNDERGROUNDSTORAGE PIPEPROPOSEDFFE=888.50LOCATION OF EXISTING STORM ISUNCLEAR. LOCATE EXISTINGSTORM LEADER FROM BUILDING.CONNECT TO CB-1026" PERFORATEDPVC DRAINTILELIGHTING BY OTHERS(SEE ARCH)CONNECT TOEXISTING.VERIFY LOCATION ANDELEVATION.Project No.Revisions1220 Marshall Street NEMinneapolisMinnesota 55413-1036612.677.7100612.677.7499 faxwww.rsparch.comRSP ArchitectsCertificationProjectForI hereby certify that this plan, specification or report wasprepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I ama duly licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.DateRegistration NumberSignatureDrawn ByChecked ByDateConsultants2016-062.1K. BIVERJ. LARSON07/30/2016No. Date Description1 08/31/2015STORMWATER BMPs2 09/15/2015CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS08/04/201644628NOTICE: The designs shown and described hereinincluding all technical drawings, graphics, and modelsthereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicatedor commercially exploited, in whole or in part, withoutexpress written permission of RSP Architects. These areavailable for limited review and evaluation by clients,consultants, contractors, government agencies, vendorsand office personnel only in accordance with this Notice.© Copyright RSP Architects 2015. All rights reserved.West End Office Park:West End CenterCONSTRUCTIONDOCUMENTS8/4/1610025 Valley View RoadSuite 140, Eden PrairieMinnesota 55344952.646.0236952.646.0290 faxwww.evs-eng.comEVS, Inc.SCALE IN FEET010 20UTILITY PLANSTORMWATER CATCH BASINSTORMWATER MANHOLESTORMWATER PIPEGRADING LIMITSDRAINTILELIGHTING BY OTHERSUTILITY NOTES1. LOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES; VERIFY LOCATION, SIZE, AND INVERTELEVATIONS. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE NOTED, THE ENGINEERSHOULD BE IMMEDIATELY NOTIFIED FOR RESOLUTION.2. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF PROPOSED BUILDING UTILITY SERVICES,VERIFY ALL PROPOSED BUILDING UTILITY SERVICE PIPE SIZES,LOCATIONS, AND ELEVATIONS WITH MECHANICAL PLANS. COORDINATECONSTRUCTION AND CONNECTIONS WITH MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR.3. ALL CONNECTIONS TO CITY UTILITIES TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THECITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK STANDARDS.4. VERIFY ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITY SERVICES PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION.5. CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL FOR EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS 48HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEENLOCATED UTILITIES AND THE EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN SHOULD BENOTED AND FORWARDED TO THE ENGINEER.6. COORDINATE WITH IRRIGATION AND LIGHTING CONTRACTORS FORCONDUIT CROSSINGS NEEDED.7. RECORD AS-BUILT DRAWINGS SHALL BE SUBMITTED BY THECONTRACTOR UPON COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT.8. ALL MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY.9. PVC SOLVENT WELD JOINTS MUST INCLUDE A PRIMER OF CONTRASTINGCOLOR TO THE PIPE AND CEMENT (MINNESOTA RULES, PART 4715.0810,SUBPART 2).10. ANY EXISTING SITE PARKING LIGHTING WITHIN CONSTRUCTION AREA TOBE SALVAGED AND STORED. UPON COMPLETION OF SITE WORK,SALVAGED LIGHTING TO BE REINSTALLED AND LOCATIONS TO BECOORDINATED WITH ARCHITECT.STORM SEWER NOTES1. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE RCP, CLASS III (MIN.), WITH FLEXIBLEWATERTIGHT JOINTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C-361 OR PVC PIPE(ASTM D3034, SDR 35) INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2321,UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.2. FLEXIBLE JOINTS AT STORM SEWER PIPE CONNECTIONS TOSTRUCTURES:2.1. IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINNESOTA RULES 4715.0700 AND 4715.0750,PROVIDE FLEXIBLE JOINTS AT ALL PIPE CONNECTIONS TO ALL STORMSEWER STRUCTURES.2.2. ACCEPTABLE MANUFACTURERS / PRODUCTS:2.2.1. FERNCO, "CONCRETE MANHOLE ADAPTORS" OR "LARGEDIAMETER WATERSTOPS"2.2.2. PRESS-SEAL, WATERSTOP GROUTING RINGS2.2.3. OR APPROVED EQUALLEGENDSTRUCTURE TABLEC400City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4b) Title: Minor Amendment to Parkdale CenterPage 9 Utica Ave S0+00 1+00 2+003+004+005+005+31 BP: 0+00.00PC: 1+48.07PT: 2+06.13 PC: 3+27.52PT: 3+85.70EP: 5+30.74INSTALL ADS ENVIROHOODOR APPROVED EQUALOVER HDPE PIPE INVERT.PERFORATED UNDERGROUNDSTORAGE PIPE87.91G.B.H.P.90.93H.P.90.7187.01L.P.0.50%0.50%5.00%5.00%5.00%5.00%2.93%PROPOSEDFFE=888.50CONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONCRETE SIDEWALKUNIT PAVERSCONCRETE PLANTERSB612 C&GCONCRETE STAIRSPEDESTRIAN RAMPCONCRETE SIDEWALKSTONE(SEE SHEET L200)18'9'24'5'7'9'24'PEDESTRIAN RAMP12'12'18'9'890.67891.03B:888.14B:887.93B:887.94B:888.17B:888.00888.28B:888.26B:888.24B:888.24B:888.19B:888.20B:888.26B:888.30B:888.28B:888.28B:888.30888.30888.39B:888.30B:888.30B:888.29B:888.29B:888.41B:888.33B:888.37B:888.43???889.29888.38890.16890.06890.39890.83890.16890.85890.23890.22888.19888.12888.44888.46888.47888.50888.50888.4810'10'T:890.13T:890.13B:889.35B:889.16B:888.13B:888.40B:888.45T:888.80T:888.80T:888.80T:888.80T:890.13T:890.13T:890.13T:890.13T:890.13T:890.13T:890.13T:890.13T:890.13T:890.13T:890.13T:890.13T:891.30T:891.30T:891.30T:891.28T:890.13887.89887.62887.31887.25889.16888.71889.23890.82891.30891.45891.69891.39891.11890.27889.99887.53886.79887.74887.69887.98889.28889.73889.81887.25887.32891.86891.91889.30889.82890.17890.30890.30892.05887.27887.73888.41887.80887.11887.92Project No.Revisions1220 Marshall Street NEMinneapolisMinnesota 55413-1036612.677.7100612.677.7499 faxwww.rsparch.comRSP ArchitectsCertificationProjectForI hereby certify that this plan, specification or report wasprepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I ama duly licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.DateRegistration NumberSignatureDrawn ByChecked ByDateConsultants2016-062.1K. BIVERJ. LARSON07/30/2016No. Date Description1 08/31/2015STORMWATER BMPs2 09/15/2015CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS08/04/201644628NOTICE: The designs shown and described hereinincluding all technical drawings, graphics, and modelsthereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicatedor commercially exploited, in whole or in part, withoutexpress written permission of RSP Architects. These areavailable for limited review and evaluation by clients,consultants, contractors, government agencies, vendorsand office personnel only in accordance with this Notice.© Copyright RSP Architects 2015. All rights reserved.West End Office Park:West End CenterCONSTRUCTIONDOCUMENTS8/4/1610025 Valley View RoadSuite 140, Eden PrairieMinnesota 55344952.646.0236952.646.0290 faxwww.evs-eng.comEVS, Inc.SCALE IN FEET010 20PAVING PLANGRADING LIMITSBITUMINOUS PAVEMENTCONCRETE SIDEWALKPATIO PAVERS 2' x 2'STONE (SEE SHEET L200)PROPOSED PARKING STRIPESSPOT ELEVATIONTOP OF WALL ELEVATIONBOTTOM OF WALL ELEVATIONCURB ELEVATION (GUTTER LINE)PAVING NOTES1. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS2. PAVING SECTIONS (SEE DETAIL 5 & 6, SHEET C602):a. LIGHT-DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVINGb. CONCRETE SIDEWALKS3. CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO BETWEEN DAWN AND DUSK, ORTHE HOURS ESTABLISHED BY CLIENT.LEGENDC500T:900.00B:900.00900.00891.69900.00City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4b) Title: Minor Amendment to Parkdale CenterPage 10 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4b) Title: Minor Amendment to Parkdale Center Page 11 Project No.Revisions1220 Marshall Street NEMinneapolisMinnesota 55413-1036612.677.7100612.677.7499 faxwww.rsparch.comRSP ArchitectsCertificationProjectForI hereby certify that this plan, specification or report wasprepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I ama duly licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of theState of Minnesota.DateRegistration NumberSignatureDrawn ByChecked ByDateConsultants2016-062.1M.GRINAT.KREUN07/30/2016No. Date Description1 08/31/2015STORMWATER BMPs2 09/15/2015CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS09/15/201546607NOTICE: The designs shown and described hereinincluding all technical drawings, graphics, and modelsthereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicatedor commercially exploited, in whole or in part, withoutexpress written permission of RSP Architects. These areavailable for limited review and evaluation by clients,consultants, contractors, government agencies, vendorsand office personnel only in accordance with this Notice.&RS\ULJKW563$UFKLWHFWV$OOULJKWVUHVHUYHGWest End Office Park- West End CenterCONSTRUCTIONDOCUMENTS8/04/1610025 Valley View RoadSuite 140, Eden PrairieMinnesota 55344952.646.0236952.646.0290 faxwww.evs-eng.comEVS, Inc.SUITE 200115 WASHINGTON AVE NENVIRONMENTAL DESIGNMASTER PLANNINGLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREMINNEAPOLIS MN 55401TEL 612.359.9144www.oaala.com2486204 AUGUST 2016PLANT MATERIAL SCHEDULENOTESPLANTING PLAN &PLANTING PLANSCALE: 1"=10'TREE PLANTING DETAILSCALE: 1/2"=1'-0"TYP. CURB SEC.SCALE: 3/4"=1'-0"ROCK MULCH SECTIONSCALE: 3/4"=1'-0"TYP. PLANTER WALL SECTIONSCALE: 3/4"=1'-0"SITE DETAILS18/26/161111CCD NO. 2City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4b) Title: Minor Amendment to Parkdale CenterPage 12 Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: September 6, 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Related to Accessory Buildings and Signs RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to approve Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance amending Chapter 36 of the St. Louis Park Code of Ordinances relating to zoning to amend regulations pertaining to accessory buildings and signs, and to approve the ordinance summary for publication. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the council wish to amend the ordinance pertaining to accessory buildings and signs? SUMMARY: Staff is requesting an amendment to the Zoning Code that proposes to: 1. Update the maximum size accessory building that can be constructed without a building permit, and require a zoning permit for those buildings. 2. Correct conflicting setbacks required for accessory buildings. 3. Increase the size maximum allowed for signs in the R-4 Multiple-Family Residence district and the R-C High-Density Multiple-Family Residence district. 4. Decrease the minimum setback required for signs at schools, community centers, libraries, religious institutions, and other similar uses. Planning Commission Review: On July 20, 2016, the Planning Commission held a public hearing for the requested zoning amendment. No one was present to speak, and the Planning Commission recommended approval of the ordinance. Council First Reading: The council approved the First Reading of the ordinance on August 15, 2016. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion Proposed Ordinance Proposed Ordinance Summary for Publication Prepared by: Gary Morrison, Assistant Zoning Administrator Reviewed by: Sean Walther, Planning & Zoning Supervisor Michele Schnitker, Housing Supervisor Approved by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director Consent Agenda Item: 4c City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4c) Page 2 Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Related to Accessory Buildings and Signs DISCUSSION REQUEST: Staff is requesting an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance that proposes to: 1. Update the maximum size accessory building that can be constructed without a building permit, and require a zoning permit for those buildings. 2. Correct conflicting setbacks required for accessory buildings. 3. Increase the size maximum allowed for signs in the R-4 Multiple-Family Residence district and the R-C High-Density Multiple-Family Residence district. 4. Decrease the minimum setback required for signs at schools, community centers, libraries, religious institutions, and other similar uses. BACKGROUND: Staff is requesting the amendments for various reasons, and each amendment is discussed below. Accessory Buildings: There are two changes proposed that effect accessory buildings. 1. The minimum setback allowed for accessory buildings is two feet, measured from side and rear property lines to the edge of the eave or similar overhang. There is an old provision in the code that contradicts this setback. The encroachment section of the code allows the eave of an accessory building to be located 16 inches from the property line. Staff is recommending this provision be removed. 2. In 2015, the state increased the minimum size of accessory building to be constructed without a building permit from 120 to 200 square feet. As a result of this change, the city needs to increase the maximum size that an accessory building needs a zoning permit from 120 to 200 square feet. The zoning permit is a permit submitted to construct a shed or similar building. It gives the city the opportunity to review buildings that are too small to trigger a building permit in order to ensure that they meet the required setbacks and other zoning regulations. Signs: The proposed changes to the sign ordinance include: 1. Creating two categories for signs in the R-4 district. The first category establishes criteria for properties less than 30,000 square feet in area, the second category establishes criteria for properties greater than 30,000 square feet in area. 2. Increasing the amount of signage allowed for properties in the R-C High-Density Multiple- Family Residence district from 40 to 60 square feet for properties less than 30,000 square feet, and from 80 to 100 square feet for properties greater than 30,000 square feet. The purpose of the sign area amendments for the R-4 and R-C districts is twofold. First, it is to provide more signage for the larger projects. The larger projects tend to have more street frontages, and therefore, a need for additional signage. Large developments with very little signage make it difficult to identify the development. Second, and somewhat related to the first, is to provide signage that is in scale with the size and scope of the development. 3. Decreasing the minimum required setback for signs located at schools, religious institutions and similar uses from 25 to 10 feet. The setback for signs throughout the city is 10 feet from property line. There are some exceptions, such as signs in the C-1, C-2, City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4c) Page 3 Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Related to Accessory Buildings and Signs BP, and M-X districts have a five-foot minimum setback. The request is to allow institutions to utilize the standard 10-foot setback. There are many institutions in the city that have a sign approximately 10 feet from the front property line. These signs are legally non-conforming, and below are examples of three such signs. These signs would become legally conforming if they are 10 or more feet from the property line. Additionally, the minimum front yard setback for buildings in the single-family zoning districts is 30 feet in the R-1 district, and 25 feet in the R-2 district. A 10-foot setback for signs would better accommodate the sign between the building and the street. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4c) Page 4 Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Related to Accessory Buildings and Signs The school district currently has a request to install a sign at Central Community Center. The required 25-foot setback places the sign in the drive aisle of the parking lot, while a 10-foot setback allows the sign to be appropriately installed in the area that has been striped for no parking (see aerial photo below). The proposed location of the sign is important as it is visible, and directs people to the appropriate section of the building for specific services. Proposed sign location Property line 25-foot setback City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4c) Page 5 Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Related to Accessory Buildings and Signs ORDINANCE NO. ____-16 CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 36 OF THE ST. LOUIS PARK CITY CODE RELATING TO SECTION 73-YARD ENCROACHMENTS, SECTION 162-RESTRICTIONS AND PERFORMANCE STANDARDS, AND SECTION 362- SIGN REGULATIONS WHEREAS, The City Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission (Case No. 16-28-ZA). WHEREAS, The St. Louis Park Ordinance Code, Sections 36-4, 36-233, 36-243, and 36-244 are hereby amended by adding underscored language. Section breaks are represented by ***. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK DOES ORDAIN: SECTION 1. St. Louis Park City Code Chapter 36 is amended to add the following section: Sec. 36-73. Yard encroachments. *** (c) Accessory buildings rear or side yard. The following shall not be encroachments on rear and side yard requirements for accessory buildings: cornices, eaves and gutters; provided they do not extend more than eight inches into a required yard; and provided such encroachment is no closer than 16 inches from all lot lines. Building overhangs shall also comply with the state building code. *** Sec. 36-162. Restrictions and performance standards. *** (d) Accessory structures. Accessory structures shall comply with the following regulations: *** (7) Permit required. All accessory buildings (including accessory storage buildings 120 200 square feet or less in area) shall obtain a zoning or building permit prior to installation and must be anchored in a manner approved by the city. *** Sec. 36-362. Sign regulations. *** City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4c) Page 6 Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Related to Accessory Buildings and Signs TABLE 36-362A SIGN AREA AND HEIGHT Use District &Lot Size (sq ft) Maximum Sign Height (feet) PERMANENT SIGNAGE TEMPORARY SIGNAGE REAL ESTATE SIGNAGE Maximum Total Area (sq ft) Maximum Size of Sign Face (sq ft) Maximum Total Area (sq ft) Maximum Total Area (sq ft) R-4 R-4 0 – 30,000 610 40 40 25 80 Over 30,000 10 60 60 25 80 R-C 0 - 230,000 15 40 60 40 25 80 Over 230,000 15 8100 60 25 80 *** (g) Adjustments to table 36-362A. Signs which qualify for any adjustment permitted under this section shall conform to all other sections of this chapter. (1) In an R district, identification signs may be permitted for religious institutions, libraries, museums, art galleries, schools, golf courses, country clubs, community centers, colleges, universities, hospitals and sanitariums in excess of the size allowed in table 36-362A based on the following criteria: *** e. Location. A freestanding sign shall not be less than 25 feet from any property line. fe. Sign purpose. The principal purpose of any sign permitted under this section shall be to identify the public or institutional use made of the property. SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall take effect fifteen days after its publication. Public Hearing July 20, 2016 First Reading August 15, 2016 Second Reading September 6, 2016 Date of Publication September 15, 2016 Date Ordinance takes effect September 30, 2016 Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council September 6, 2016 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Approved as to Form and Execution: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Soren Mattick, City Attorney City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4c) Page 7 Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Related to Accessory Buildings and Signs SUMMARY FOR PUBLICATION ORDINANCE NO.____-16 AN ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO ACCESSORY BUILDINGS AND SIGNS This ordinance amends the Zoning Code relating to yard encroachments, restrictions and performance standards for accessory buildings, and setback and area limits for signs. This ordinance shall take effect 15 days after publication. Adopted by the City Council September 6, 2016 Jake Spano /s/ Mayor A copy of the full text of this ordinance is available for inspection with the City Clerk. Published in St. Louis Park Sailor: September 15, 2016 Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: September 6, 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Second Reading of Ordinance Vacating Drainage Utility Easements for Parkway 25 Redevelopment RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to approve the Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance vacating drainage utility easements, and to approve the Ordinance Summary for Publication. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Are the drainage and utility easements needed for public purposes? SUMMARY: The Parkway 25 redevelopment site is located at 4001 and 4025 Highway 7. The redevelopment proposal includes a preliminary and final plat to combine two parcels into one parcel, and a preliminary and final planned unit development (PUD) to allow construction of a mixed use development including 111 residential units and approximately 8,850 square feet of commercial space. The proposed site design includes several encroachments into existing drainage utility easements. In order for the proposed development to proceed, these easements need to be vacated. The applicant requests the City vacate drainage utility easements for the properties legally described as Lot 2, Block 1, Thomas O. Heggen’s Addition and Lot 3, Block 1, Thomas O. Heggen’s Addition. The development plan proposes using this easement area for an underground storm water management system, underground parking, and building improvements. St. Louis Park City Council approved the preliminary and final plat on August 15, 2016 which includes two new drainage utility easements that better suit the site and development, and maintain the City’s interests for ongoing easements. Legal description and depictions of the easements to be vacated are included in the attached ordinance. The City Council held a public hearing on August 15, 2016 and approved the First Reading of the Ordinance. Five councilmembers must support the ordinance in order to vacate the easements. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance Ordinance Summary Prepared by: Nicole Mardell, Associate Planner Reviewed by: Sean Walther, Planning & Zoning Supervisor Approved by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director Consent Agenda Item: 4d City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4d) Page 2 Title: Second Reading of Ordinance Vacating Drainage Utility Easements for Parkway 25 Redevelopment ORDINANCE NO.____-16 AN ORDINANCE VACATING DRAINAGE UTILITY EASEMENTS ON THE PROPERTIES AT 4001 AND 4025 HIGHWAY 7 THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK DOES ORDAIN: Section 1. A petition in writing signed by a majority of all of the owners of all property abutting the easements proposed to be vacated has been duly filed. The notice of said petition has been published in the St. Louis Park Sailor on August 4, 2016 and the City Council has conducted a public hearing upon said petition and has determined that the drainage utility easements are not needed for public purposes, and that it is for the best interest of the public that said drainage and utility easements be vacated. Section 2. The easements described in Exhibit “A”, and depicted on Exhibits “B” and “C”, as now dedicated and laid out within the corporate limits of the City of St. Louis Park are vacated. Section 3. The City Clerk is instructed to record certified copies of this ordinance in the Office of the Hennepin County Register of Deeds or Registrar of Titles as the case may be. Section_4. This Ordinance shall take effect upon recording of the Parkway 25 final plat, and not less than fifteen days after its publication. Public Hearing August 15, 2016 First Reading August 15, 2016 Second Reading September 6, 2016 Date of Publication September 16, 2016 Date Ordinance may take effect October 3, 2016 Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council September 6, 2016 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Approved as to Form and Execution: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Soren Mattick, City Attorney City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4d) Page 3 Title: Second Reading of Ordinance Vacating Drainage Utility Easements for Parkway 25 Redevelopment EXHIBIT “A” LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS The following are the legal descriptions of the easements to be vacated: All of the Drainage and Utility Easement as dedicated in Lot 3, Block 1, Thomas O. Heggen’s Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. All of the Drainage and Utility Easement as dedicated in Lot 2, Block 1, Thomas O. Heggen’s Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4d) Page 4 Title: Second Reading of Ordinance Vacating Drainage Utility Easements for Parkway 25 Redevelopment EXHIBIT “B” City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4d) Page 5 Title: Second Reading of Ordinance Vacating Drainage Utility Easements for Parkway 25 Redevelopment EXHIBIT “C” City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4d) Page 6 Title: Second Reading of Ordinance Vacating Drainage Utility Easements for Parkway 25 Redevelopment SUMMARY FOR PUBLICATION ORDINANCE NO.____-16 AN ORDINANCE VACATING UTILITY EASEMENTS This ordinance states that drainage utility easements will be vacated for a portion of the properties located at 4001 and 4025 State Highway 7. This ordinance shall take effect 15 days after publication. Adopted by the City Council September 6, 2016 Jake Spano /s/ Mayor A copy of the full text of this ordinance is available for inspection with the City Clerk. Published in St. Louis Park Sailor: September 15, 2016 Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: September 6, 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance and Map Amendments for the Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUD RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to approve the Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance creating Section 26-268-PUD 7 of the Zoning Code and amending the Zoning Map from C-2 General Commercial to the Planned Unit Development (PUD) 7 for the property located at 4001 and 4025 Highway 7, and approve the Summary Ordinance for publication. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council support the proposed PUD to allow the Parkway 25 project? SUMMARY: Sela Group is requesting a Preliminary and Final PUD for redevelopment of the former Vescio’s restaurant (4001 Highway 7) and ValuStay Inn site (4025 Highway 7). Approval would allow for the construction of a five story, mixed-use building with 111 residential units, approximately 8,850 square feet of commercial space, and parking located in two surface lots and in an underground parking ramp. The rezoning is consistent with the commercial designation in the Comprehensive Plan and the proposed use of the property. The applicant is not seeking financial assistance from the City of St. Louis Park. The Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended approval on July 20, 2016. The City Council approved the first reading of the Ordinance on August 15, 2016. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis park is committed to providing a well-maintained and diverse housing stock. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion Ordinance Ordinance Summary Official Exhibits Prepared by: Nicole Mardell, Associate Planner Reviewed by: Sean Walther, Planning & Zoning Supervisor Approved by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director Consent Agenda Item: 4e City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Page 2 Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance and Map Amendments for the Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUD DISCUSSION REQUEST: Sela Group is requesting a Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development and vacation of drainage utility easements to construct a five story, mixed-use building. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The proposed redevelopment site lies south of County State Aid Highway 25 and west of Glenhurst Avenue. The property located at 4001 Highway 7 contains the former Vescio’s restaurant space. The restaurant closed in December of 2015 and currently sits vacant. The property located at 4025 Highway 7 contains the ValuStay Inn hotel built in 1951. SITE INFORMATION: Site Area: 1.574 acres Zoning: C-2 General Commercial Comprehensive Plan: Commercial Neighborhood: Triangle Current Use: Vacant restaurant, hotel Proposed Use: Apartments, commercial space Proposed Zoning: PUD – Planned Unit Development SITE LOCATION MAP: SURROUNDING LAND USES: North: County State Aid Highway 25 (CSAH 25) East: Glenhurst Avenue, 5-Story Mixed Use Building (Under Construction) South: 3-Story Multi-Family Residential, Single Family Home, City of St. Louis Park Lift Station West: Retail Strip Mall City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Page 3 Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance and Map Amendments for the Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUD BACKGROUND: Parkway 25 is the redevelopment of the former Vescio’s restaurant and ValuStay Inn located at the southwest corner of CSAH 25 and Glenhurst Avenue. The former Vescio’s restaurant and ValuStay Inn are deteriorating buildings. On August 15, 2016 the applicant received city council approval for a preliminary and final plat to combine the two properties into a 1.574 acre site. The applicant proposes a 5-story, mixed use development. The east wing of the building contains 3,930 gross square feet of commercial space planned to be a restaurant with outdoor patio seating. The west wing of the building contains 4,910 gross square feet of commercial space planned to be a fitness facility. In between the two commercial spaces are resident amenities and access to an open lobby. Ground floor residential units are located behind the commercial space with direct entrances to maintain an active “front door” presence. The development promotes biking through a large indoor bike storage area in the underground ramp and access to a bike repair station. The development includes a fenced outdoor dog run and dog washing station for pet owners. PUD ANALYSIS: Description The developer requests approval of a preliminary and final Planned Unit Development (PUD). A PUD is a rezoning and zoning text amendment that establishes the regulations for a specific property. Uses The proposed uses on site include 111 residential units, 3,930 gross square feet of restaurant space, and 4,910 gross square feet of fitness/yoga facility. Comprehensive Plan The Comprehensive Plan designates the site for commercial use. This category would allow for multifamily uses, provided commercial uses are also included. The proposed PUD would create a new zoning district and zoning regulations for uses and dimensional standards that are unique to this site and the proposed site and building plans. Staff finds that this site is suitable for the proposed mixed use development and meets many of the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. The site provides a mixture of market rate apartments while also providing ground floor commercial space promoting an active street frontage. The development provides ample bike parking and is situated near the Cedar Lake Trail, Route 17 bus line, and is in between the future West Lake and Beltline Southwest LRT stations. The outdoor amenity areas provide outdoor recreation space for residents. Traffic SRF Consulting Group completed a traffic study for the Parkway 25 development. The final report dated August 5, 2016 determined the access, circulation, and parking on site to be adequate. The study recommended a review of truck turning movements to ensure garbage trucks have adequate accommodations to negotiate internal parking lot aisles. Staff has reviewed these turning movements and finds they are adequate. Building and Site Design Analysis Parkway 25 meets the PUD ordinance goals for building and site design. The ordinance requires the City to find that the quality of building and site design proposed will substantially enhance aesthetics of the site and implement relevant goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. In addition, the following criteria shall be satisfied: City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Page 4 Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance and Map Amendments for the Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUD (1) The design shall consider the project as a whole, and shall create a unified environment within project boundaries by ensuring architectural compatibility of all structures, efficient vehicular and pedestrian circulation, aesthetically pleasing landscape and site features, and design and efficient use of utilities. Staff finds the plan meets this requirement. (2) The design of a PUD shall achieve compatibility of the project with surrounding land uses, both existing and proposed, and shall minimize the potential adverse impacts of the PUD on surrounding land uses and the potential adverse effects of the surrounding land uses on the PUD. Staff finds this criteria will be met. (3) A PUD shall comply with the City’s Green Building Policy. This is a condition of approval. The architect is working with Xcel Energy, Centerpoint Energy, and the City of St. Louis Park to comply. (4) The use of green roofs or white roofs and on-site renewable energy is encouraged. Staff is working with the applicant on the addition of a white roof. ZONING ANALYSIS: The following table provides the development metrics. The property will be rezoned to a Planned Unit Development (PUD). The proposed performance and development standards, as indicated in the development plans, establish the development requirements for this property if approved. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Page 5 Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance and Map Amendments for the Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUD Zoning Compliance Table: Factor Required Proposed Met? Use Commercial Mixed Use-Commercial and Residential Yes Lot Area 2.0 acres, or less with City Council approval 1.574 acres Yes Height No maximum with PUD 67 feet Yes Building Materials Minimum of 60% Class I materials A: 69.4% Class I, 30.6% Class II B: 62.8% Class I, 37.2% Class II C: 73.4% Class I, 26.6% Class II D: 70.7% Class I, 29.3% Class II E: 71.0% Class I, 29.0% Class II F: 70.5% Class I, 29.5 % Class II G: 85.8% Class I, 14.2 % Class II H: 68.4% Class I, 31.6% Class II Yes Density 50 units/acre, or more with PUD 66.7 units/acre Yes Floor Area Ratio None with PUD 2.09 Yes Ground Floor Area Ratio N/A 0.2 Yes Off-Street Parking Residential: 153 spaces 1 space/bedroom Commercial: 77 spaces 1 space/60 square feet for restaurant (63 spaces) 1 space/200 square feet for fitness (23 spaces) -10% parking reduction (-9 spaces) Total: 230 spaces 159 underground spaces 55 off-street surface spaces 16 on-street spaces Total: 230 parking spaces Yes Bicycle Parking Residential: 122 1 space/unit (111 spaces) 1 space/10 automobile spaces (11 spaces) Commercial: 8 10% of required vehicle parking Total: 130 spaces 132 interior bike spaces in underground ramp 14 exterior bike spaces Total: 146 bike spaces Yes DORA 12% total lot area 12,187 square feet, 17.7% Yes Landscaping See Landscaping section Yes Setbacks None with PUD Front (North): 0’ Side (East): 14’ Rear (South): varies, 17’- 70’ Side (West): varies 47’- 73’ Yes Mechanical Equipment Full screening required Rooftop equipment screened by parapet so as not visible from off-site. Yes Sidewalks Required along all streets and building frontages Provided along all streets and building frontages Yes Refuse handling Full screening required Full screening provided by trash enclosure Yes Transit service None required Served by route 17 Yes Stormwater Management Required Provided underground and includes other best management practices Yes City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Page 6 Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance and Map Amendments for the Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUD Uses The proposal includes a mix of commercial and residential space on the ground floor and residential above. The current commercial tenants are expected to be a 3,930 gross square foot restaurant on the northeast corner of the building and a 4,910 gross square foot fitness space on the northwest corner of the building. The ground level will also include a private fitness space for residents, community room, business conference room, and outdoor amenity space with a pool. The 1.574 acres of the proposed site is smaller than the required 2 acres for a Planned Unit Development although the zoning code allows for PUDs on smaller sites with City Council approval. Staff believes that a PUD will allow for conditions and requirements that fit the context and character of the individual site and the proposed development. A draft of the ordinance outlining these conditions is attached to this report. It should also be noted that the neighboring commercial property is owned by the applicant, and has the potential to be incorporated into the development in the future. The neighboring commercial property is not part of this application. Architectural Design The proposal requests to combine the site to allow for a 5-story, 111-unit mixed use building. The building massing is sited toward the north side of the property and east and west sides. The 5th floor steps back in the middle of the north façade and along the two wings toward the lower density housing to the south. Commercial and amenity functions are located exclusively on the ground floor providing active uses along the CSAH 25 Frontage Road. The primary building materials are stone, glass, and prefinished metal panel. Stone and storefront glazing form the base and corner of the building with a visual bridge of metal panel on the residential part of the building over a deep overhang sheltering pedestrians along the north façade and pedestrian plaza. The south side of the building is a continuation of these materials with a stucco area in the courtyard over the amenity deck and pool area. Height The current height limit for a multifamily building in the C-2 district is 3 stories while the PUD district has no restriction on height. Parkway 25 is proposed to be 5 stories or 67 feet in height which suits the context of the neighboring 5-story Shoreham mixed use development. Also, the higher elevation of 31st Street to the south, mitigates the height and scale of the proposed 5-story structure. Lighting The current photometric plan meets the recommended level of 0.5-1 fc past the property line. The LED lighting features chosen are consistent with the aesthetic features of the building and are not anticipated to present a nuisance to neighboring properties. Parking Parking will total 230 stalls with 159 stalls in the underground parking ramp, 55 stalls in surface parking lots and 16 on-street spaces along Glenhurst Avenue and the Frontage Road. In order to ensure adequate parking on site, the applicant is providing a Parking Management Plan to the City. This property is located between the future West Lake and Beltline Southwest LRT stations and is currently served by Metro Transit Bus Route 17. The applicant has also provided 146 bicycle parking stalls in both an indoor secure bike room and through exterior racks, and is providing a repair station. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Page 7 Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance and Map Amendments for the Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUD Access Vehicular access to the building occurs through two separate entrances. The first is located on the Frontage Road on the west side of the building near the proposed fitness tenant. Cars have two- way access to a 25 stall visitor surface parking lot with sidewalk access into the building. The second entrance is on Glenhurst Avenue to the South of the building. Cars have two-way access to a 31 stall visitor surface parking ramp with convenient sidewalk access to the restaurant tenant and ground level residential units. The south surface parking lot also has access to the underground residential parking. As an added convenience and to improve circulation, the applicant has proposed an exit only drive aisle to a currently unimproved alley which would allow cars to exit the surface lot via the alley onto Glenhurst. The applicant must improve the alley to City standards if approved. Loading/Service Areas The site plan shows an enclosed trash area on the west side for use by the commercial fitness tenant. The restaurant on the east side will also have access to a fully enclosed and heated trash room to the south of the building. The remaining residential trash will be collected in a fully enclosed trash room located in the underground ramp. Access to this room from other floors will be provided through separate trash and recycling chutes on each floor of the building. The trash room includes adequate space designated for future organics recycling. Trash pickup access will occur in the south parking lot. Delivery access is proposed on the frontage road during off-peak hours to reduce potential nuisance to residential properties and to prevent truck traffic through the neighborhood. Landscaping The landscape plan indicates 110 new trees, 338 new shrubs, and 1,146 new perennials. The project does not meet the City’s planting counts and tree replacement requirements but has provided a variety of alternative landscaping measures in order to meet the intent of the landscaping ordinance. These alternative measures include: a fenced dog run area, outdoor fireplaces, pergola structure, wood sun deck, and swimming pool. Designed Outdoor Recreation Area (DORA) The proposed development plans illustrate DORA through the inclusion of the outdoor amenity space. The plan exceeds the City’s minimum 12% DORA requirement by providing 17.7% DORA. The front plaza is located in Hennepin County right of way and is not included in the DORA percentage. Signs A sign plan was not submitted for review. Signs will require permits and must comply with the MX Mixed Use District signage code requirements. Utilities All small utilities will be placed underground. Utility service structures, such as a generator and transformer, will be screened completely from off-site with materials consistent with main building facade. Per the development agreement, buildings will provide the necessary infrastructure to take advantage of fiber-optic service lines in the vicinity of the development. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Page 8 Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance and Map Amendments for the Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUD Public Input A neighborhood meeting regarding the project was held on February 18, 2016. Approximately six people attended, excluding city and developer representatives. Attendees included owners and managers of nearby apartment and condo buildings and resident property owners. One of the primary concerns was parking, and a desire to avoid additional on-street parking demand on 31st Street. The neighboring property owner to the south inquired about access proposed to the alley, which was not included at the time. Staff and the applicant met with the neighboring property owner to discuss concerns about the proposed alley access included in the current plan. The property owner requested the applicant extend the improvements being made to the alley to his property to allow for a future connection. The applicant has not included this request in the current plan, and staff has not included this as a requirements. The design of the alley, however, has been reviewed by staff and it will not preclude a future extension to serve the neighbor’s property. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Page 9 Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance and Map Amendments for the Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUD ORDINANCE NO. ____-16 ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ST. LOUIS PARK CITY CODE RELATING TO ZONING BY CREATING SECTION 36-268-PUD 7 AS A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4001 AND 4025 HIGHWAY 7 THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK DOES ORDAIN: Findings Sec. 1. The City Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission (Case No. 16-13-S, 16-14-PUD and 16-18-VAC) for amending the Zoning Ordinance to create a new Planned Unit Development (PUD) Zoning District. Sec. 2. The Comprehensive Plan designates this property as Commercial. Sec. 3. The Zoning Map shall be amended by reclassifying the following described lands from C-2 General Commercial to PUD 7: Lot 3, Block 1, Thomas O. Heggen’s Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota Sec. 4. The St. Louis Park Ordinance Code, Section 36-268 is hereby amended to add the following Planned Unit Development Zoning District: Section 36-268-PUD 7. (a) Development Plan The site shall be developed, used and maintained in conformance with the following Final PUD signed Official Exhibits: 1. C0.0– Cover Sheet 2. C0.1 – Site Survey 3. C1.0 – Removals Plan 4. C2.0 – Site Plan 5. C2.1 – Alley Plan and Profile 6. C3.0 – Grading Plan 7. C3.1 – Grading Plan Interim 8. C4.0 – Utility Plan 9. C5.0 – Civil Details 10. C5.1 – Civil Details 11. C5.2 – Civil Details 12. SW1.0 – SWPPP – Existing Conditions 13. SW1.1 – SWPPP – Proposed Conditions 14. SW1.2 – SWPPP – Narrative and Details 15. SW1.3 – SWPPP – Attachments 16. SW1.4 – SWPPP- Attachments 17. L100 – Tree Preservation Plan City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Page 10 Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance and Map Amendments for the Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUD 18. L200 – Preliminary Landscape Plan 19. L500 – Planting Details 20. G000 – Cover Sheet 21. A100P – Floor Plan – Level -1 22. A110P – Floor Plan – Level 1 23. A120P – Floor Plan – Level 2-4 24. A150P – Floor Plan – Level 5 25. A160P – Roof Plan 26. A200 – Exterior Elevations 27. A201 – Exterior Elevations 28. AS100 – Architectural Site Plan 29. Site Lighting Photometric Plan 30. Zoning Map Amendment Exhibit 31. Preliminary Plat 32. Final Plat 33. Traffic Study 34. Parking Management Plan 35. Parking Agreement The site shall also conform to the following requirements: 1) The property shall be developed with 111 residential units and 8,850 square feet of ground floor commercial space. 2) At least 214 off-street parking spaces shall be provided. At least 16 on-street parallel parking and loading spaces shall be installed adjacent to the site. An off- street parking management plan shall be approved by the city and managed by the property owner, with the goal of avoiding spill over parking into surrounding streets in the neighborhood and maximizing the benefits of mixed use development and shared parking. 3) The maximum building height shall not exceed 67 feet and five stories. 4) The development site shall include a minimum of 17.7% percent designed outdoor recreation area based on private developable land area. (b) Permitted Uses (1) Multiple-family dwellings. Uses associated with the multiple-family dwellings, including, but not limited to, the residential office, fitness facility, mail room, assembly rooms or general amenity space are limited to a maximum of 40% of the building first floor. (2) Commercial uses. Commercial uses are only permitted on the first floor, and are limited to the following: restaurant, office, private entertainment (indoor), retail shops, service, showrooms and studios. a. All parking requirements must be met for each use. b. Hours of operation for commercial uses shall be limited to 6 a.m. to 12 a.m. c. No more than 3,950 square feet of gross building floor area shall be used for restaurant. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Page 11 Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance and Map Amendments for the Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUD d. Each commercial tenant space on the first floor shall have a direct and primary access to the outside of the building on the north building elevation that is open during business hours. e. In vehicle sales is prohibited. (3) Civic and institutional uses. Civic and institutional uses are limited to the following: education/academic, library, museums/art galleries, indoor public parks/open space, police service substations, post office customer service facilities, public studios and performance theaters. (c) Accessory Uses Accessory uses are as follows: (1) Incidental repair or processing which is necessary to conduct a permitted use and not to exceed ten percent of the gross floor area of the associated permitted use. (2) Home occupations complying with all of the conditions for home occupations located in the R-C district. (3) Catering, if accessory to food service, delicatessen or retail bakery. (4) Gardens. (5) Parking lots. (6) Public transit stops/shelters. (7) Outdoor seating, public address (PA) systems are prohibited. (8) Outdoor uses and outdoor storage are prohibited. (d) Special Performance Standards (1) All general zoning requirements not specifically addressed in this ordinance shall be met, including but not limited to: outdoor lighting, architectural design, landscaping, parking and screening requirements. (2) All trash, garbage, waste materials, trash containers, and recycling containers shall be kept in the manner required by this Code. All trash handling and loading areas shall be screened from view within a waste enclosure. (3) Signage shall be allowed in conformance with the MX- Mixed Use District requirements found in the sign code. (4) Façade. The following façade design guidelines shall be applicable to all ground floor non-residential facades: a. For street-facing facades, no more than 10% of total window and door area shall be glass block, mirrored, spandrel, frosted or other opaque glass, finishes or material including window painting and signage. The remaining 90% of City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Page 12 Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance and Map Amendments for the Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUD window and door area shall be clear or slightly tinted glass, allowing views into and out of the interior. b. Visibility into the space shall be maintained for a minimum depth of three feet. This requirement shall not prohibit the display of merchandise. (5) Awnings. a. Awnings must be constructed of heavy canvas fabric, metal and/or glass. Plastic and vinyl awnings are prohibited. b. Backlit awnings are prohibited. Sec. 5. The contents of Planning Case File 16-13-S, 16-14-PUD and 16-18-VAC are hereby entered into and made part of the public hearing record and the record of decision for this case. Sec. 6. This Ordinance shall take effect fifteen days after its publication. Public Hearing July 20, 2016 First Reading August 15, 2016 Second Reading September 6, 2016 Date of Publication September 16, 2016 Date Ordinance takes effect October 1, 2016 Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council September 6, 2016 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Approved as to Form and Execution: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Soren Mattick, City Attorney City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Page 13 Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance and Map Amendments for the Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUD SUMMARY FOR PUBLICATION ORDINANCE NO.____-16 AN ORDINANCE CREATING A NEW PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICT 4001 AND 4025 HIGHWAY 7 This ordinance states that the Zoning Map shall be amended from C-2 General Commercial to PUD 7; and the Zoning Ordinance Code, Section-268 will be amended to add Section 36-268- PUD 7. This ordinance shall take effect 15 days after publication. Adopted by the City Council September 6, 2016 Jake Spano /s/ Mayor A copy of the full text of this ordinance is available for inspection with the City Clerk. Published in St. Louis Park Sailor: September 15, 2016 96*5657+6'56.17+52#4-/0CivilSiteGroup.comMatt Pavek Pat Sarver763-213-3944 952-250-2003COPYRIGHT 2015 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATE DESCRIPTION PARKWAY APARTMENTS 4001 & 4025 HIGHWAY 7, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 4915 W. 35TH STREET, SUITE #102, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 SELA GROUP, LLC PROJECT 8/2/16 CITY RESUBMITTAL8/30/16 CITY RESUBMITTAL. .. .. .. .. .. .PROJECT NUMBER: 151623/11/16 CITY SUBMITTAL7/11/16 PUD RESUBMITTAL7/29/16 HUD SUBMITTAL4/18/16 PUD RESUBMITTAL6/14/16 PUD RESUBMITTAL44263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.8/30/16REVISION SUMMARYDATE DESCRIPTIONC0.0TITLE SHEET. .. .. .. .. .. .PARKWAY APARTMENTSST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTASHEET INDEXSHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLEC0.0 TITLE SHEETSITE LOCATIONSITE LOCATION MAPNSITE SURVEYC0.1UTILITY PLANC4.0ISSUED FOR: CITY SUBMITTALMASTER LEGEND:932.0932.0BC / 932.0TC932.0TW932.0BWEXISTING LIGHTEXISTING GAS METEREXISTING MANHOLEEXISTING CATCH BASINEXISTING GATE VALVEEXISTING HYDRANTEXISTING GAS VALVEEXISTING ELECTRIC BOXEXISTING UNDERGROUND CABLEEXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRICEXISTING STOPBOXEXISTING GAS MAINEXISTING WATER MAINEXISTING STORM SEWEREXISTING SANITARY SEWERDYH DEVELOPER / PROPERTY OWNER:SELA GROUP LLC4915 W 35TH STREETSUITE 102ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416ENGINEER / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:CIVIL SITE GROUP4931 W 35TH STREETSUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416612-615-0060SURVEYOR:GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER:STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN - EXISTING CONDITIONSSW1.0GRADING PLANC3.0C5.0C5.1DETAILSSTORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN - PROPOSED CONDITIONSSW1.1SW1.2C2.0 SITE PLANPROPOSED LIGHTSTORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN - NARRATIVE AND DETAILSSW1.3DETAILSC1.0 REMOVALS PLANHARRY S. JOHNSON CO., INC.9063 LYNDALE AVENUE SOUTHBLOOMINGTON, MN 55420952-884-5341GOPHER STATE ONE CALLWWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG(800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE(651) 454-0002 LOCALSTORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN - NOTESSW1.4STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN - NOTESTERRACON3535 HOFFMAN ROAD EASTWHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110651-770-1500TRUCK TURNING MAPPRELIMINARY PLATC0.2C5.2 DETAILSC2.1 ALLEY PLAN AND PROFILEGRADING PLAN - INTERIMC3.1City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance & Map Amendments for Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUDPage 14 REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC0.1SITE SURVEY. .. .. .. .. .. .City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance & Map Amendments for Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUDPage 15 REMOVAL NOTES:CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK REMOVAL NOTES:REMOVALS LEGEND:EROSION CONTROL NOTES:96*5657+6'56.17+52#4-/0CivilSiteGroup.comMatt Pavek Pat Sarver763-213-3944 952-250-2003COPYRIGHT 2015 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATE DESCRIPTION PARKWAY APARTMENTS 4001 & 4025 HIGHWAY 7, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 4915 W. 35TH STREET, SUITE #102, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 SELA GROUP, LLC PROJECT 8/2/16 CITY RESUBMITTAL8/30/16 CITY RESUBMITTAL. .. .. .. .. .. .PROJECT NUMBER: 151623/11/16 CITY SUBMITTAL7/11/16 PUD RESUBMITTAL7/29/16 HUD SUBMITTAL4/18/16 PUD RESUBMITTAL6/14/16 PUD RESUBMITTALNREVISION SUMMARYDATE DESCRIPTIONC1.0REMOVALS PLAN. .. .. .. .. .. .GOPHER STATE ONE CALLWWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG(800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE(651) 454-0002 LOCAL44263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.8/30/16City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance & Map Amendments for Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUDPage 16 SITE LAYOUT NOTES:SITE PLAN LEGEND:CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK SITE SPECIFIC NOTES:96*5657+6'56.17+52#4-/0CivilSiteGroup.comMatt Pavek Pat Sarver763-213-3944 952-250-2003COPYRIGHT 2015 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATE DESCRIPTION PARKWAY APARTMENTS 4001 & 4025 HIGHWAY 7, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 4915 W. 35TH STREET, SUITE #102, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 SELA GROUP, LLC PROJECT 8/2/16 CITY RESUBMITTAL8/30/16 CITY RESUBMITTAL. .. .. .. .. .. .PROJECT NUMBER: 151623/11/16 CITY SUBMITTAL7/11/16 PUD RESUBMITTAL7/29/16 HUD SUBMITTAL4/18/16 PUD RESUBMITTAL6/14/16 PUD RESUBMITTALNREVISION SUMMARYDATE DESCRIPTIONC2.0SITE PLAN. .. .. .. .. .. .SITE AREA TABLE:GOPHER STATE ONE CALLWWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG(800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE(651) 454-0002 LOCAL44263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.8/30/16City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance & Map Amendments for Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUDPage 17 SITE PLAN LEGEND:96*5657+6'56.17+52#4-/0CivilSiteGroup.comMatt Pavek Pat Sarver763-213-3944 952-250-2003COPYRIGHT 2015 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATE DESCRIPTION PARKWAY APARTMENTS 4001 & 4025 HIGHWAY 7, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 4915 W. 35TH STREET, SUITE #102, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 SELA GROUP, LLC PROJECT 8/2/16 CITY RESUBMITTAL8/30/16 CITY RESUBMITTAL. .. .. .. .. .. .PROJECT NUMBER: 151623/11/16 CITY SUBMITTAL7/11/16 PUD RESUBMITTAL7/29/16 HUD SUBMITTAL4/18/16 PUD RESUBMITTAL6/14/16 PUD RESUBMITTALNREVISION SUMMARYDATE DESCRIPTIONC2.1ALLEY PLAN ANDPROFILE. .. .. .. .. .. .GOPHER STATE ONE CALLWWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG(800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE(651) 454-0002 LOCAL44263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.8/30/16TYPICAL ALLEY DETAIL:ALLEY PROFILE:8"ALLEY CROSS SECTIONS:City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance & Map Amendments for Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUDPage 18 GENERAL GRADING NOTES:GRADING PLAN LEGEND:891.0 G891.0 BC891.0 BS/TSGROUNDWATER INFORMATION:CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK GRADING NOTES:EROSION CONTROL NOTES:96*5657+6'56.17+52#4-/0CivilSiteGroup.comMatt Pavek Pat Sarver763-213-3944 952-250-2003COPYRIGHT 2015 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATE DESCRIPTION PARKWAY APARTMENTS 4001 & 4025 HIGHWAY 7, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 4915 W. 35TH STREET, SUITE #102, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 SELA GROUP, LLC PROJECT 8/2/16 CITY RESUBMITTAL8/30/16 CITY RESUBMITTAL. .. .. .. .. .. .PROJECT NUMBER: 151623/11/16 CITY SUBMITTAL7/11/16 PUD RESUBMITTAL7/29/16 HUD SUBMITTAL4/18/16 PUD RESUBMITTAL6/14/16 PUD RESUBMITTALNREVISION SUMMARYDATE DESCRIPTIONC3.0GRADING PLAN. .. .. .. .. .. .GOPHER STATE ONE CALLWWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG(800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE(651) 454-0002 LOCAL44263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.8/30/16City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance & Map Amendments for Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUDPage 19 GENERAL GRADING NOTES:GRADING PLAN LEGEND:891.0 G891.0 BC891.0 BS/TSCITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK GRADING NOTES:EROSION CONTROL NOTES:96*5657+6'56.17+52#4-/0CivilSiteGroup.comMatt Pavek Pat Sarver763-213-3944 952-250-2003COPYRIGHT 2015 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATE DESCRIPTION PARKWAY APARTMENTS 4001 & 4025 HIGHWAY 7, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 4915 W. 35TH STREET, SUITE #102, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 SELA GROUP, LLC PROJECT 8/2/16 CITY RESUBMITTAL8/30/16 CITY RESUBMITTAL. .. .. .. .. .. .PROJECT NUMBER: 151623/11/16 CITY SUBMITTAL7/11/16 PUD RESUBMITTAL7/29/16 HUD SUBMITTAL4/18/16 PUD RESUBMITTAL6/14/16 PUD RESUBMITTALNREVISION SUMMARYDATE DESCRIPTIONC3.1GRADING PLAN -INTERIM. .. .. .. .. .. .GOPHER STATE ONE CALLWWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG(800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE(651) 454-0002 LOCAL44263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.8/30/16NOTE: INTERIM GRADING PLAN SHOWSASSUMED GRADES AFTER SITE DEMOLITIONFOR BIDDING PURPOSES ASSUMING 8550 CY OFREMOVALS FOR CONTAMINATED SOILS,BUILDING PADS, AND PAVEMENT AND BASEMATERIAL.BUILDING CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE EXISTINGCATCH BASIN AND STORM SEWER PIPE.City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance & Map Amendments for Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUDPage 20 EX. MHRIM=880.00EX IE(N)=875.60EX IE (W)=873.40EX IE (E)=873.20PROP IE (S)=873.60CORE DRILL AND USE BOOT FOR NEWCONNECTION TO EXISTING MH17 LF 18" RCPSTORM @ 0.50%177 LF 18" RCPSTORM @ 0.50%30 LF 15" RCPSTORM @ 0.53%MH 1RIM=880.42IE=873.69MH 2RIM=882.04IE=874.588 LF 12" CMPSTORM @ 2.00%MH 3RIM=883.64IE (S-6"DT)=874.74IE (S-12")=879.98IE (N)=874.7412" OUTLETIE=880.14UNDERGROUND FILTRATIONSYSTEM 1A272 LF (4 ROWS @ 68 LF) 60"PERF. CMP12" SIDE & END STONE, 30"STONE SEPARATION, 6" STONECOVER AND 24" SAND BASE.BAFFLE WALLS BETWEEN PERF.AND NON-PERF. PIPE; TOPBAFFLE WALLS=878.74IE 60" CMP=876.74OE 12" ORIFICE=880.14TOP 60" CMP=881.746" DT IE=874.74100-YR HWL=881.28CB/ACCESS RISER 11RIM=883.24CB/ACCESS RISER 12RIM=883.24ACCESS RISER,TYP.6" DIP FIRE SERVICE ANDVALVE, STUB TO WITHIN5' FROM BUILDING,COORD. W/MECH'LPROPOSED GATEVALVE AND VALVE BOXMAKE WET TAPCONNECTION TOEXISTING WATERMAIN, COORD.WITH CITYMAKE CONNECTION TOEXISTING 15" RCPSANITARY SEWEREX IE 15" (N/S)=866.33(FIELD VERIFY)PROP IE (W)=866.63COORDINATE WITH CITY47 LF 12" RCPSTORM @ 0.64%25 LF 12" CMPSTORM @ 1.00%MH 21RIM=880.35IE (S-6"DT)=872.80IE (S-12")=877.55IE (N)=872.8012" OUTLETIE=877.80EX. MHRIM=880.83EX IE(W/E)=872.00PROP IE (S)=872.50CORE DRILL AND USE BOOTFOR NEW CONNECTION TOEXISTING MHUNDERGROUND FILTRATIONSYSTEM 2152 LF (1 ROW @ 152 LF) 54"PERF. CMP12" SIDE & END STONE, 6"STONE COVER AND 24" SANDBASE.IE 48" CMP=874.80OE 12" ORIFICE=877.80TOP 48" CMP=878.806" DT IE=872.80100-YR HWL=878.33ACCESS RISER,TYP.STUB STORM TO 5'FROM BUILDINGIE @ STUB = 878.78COORD. W/ MECH'L12" INLETIE=878.742 LF 12" PVCSDR 26 @ 2.00%BAFFLE WALL, TYP.TOP=878.84STUB STORM TO 5'FROM BUILDINGIE @ STUB = 876.84COORD. W/ MECH'L12" INLETIE=876.802 LF 12" PVCSDR 26 @ 2.00%RIM=884.78SEE ARCH'L ANDMECH'L PLAN FOR LOWPOINTS OVER BUILDINGRECONSTRUCT ALLEXISTING CASTINGS TOREMAIN TO BE FLUSHWITH PROPOSED GRADERECONSTRUCT EXISTING CASTING,UTILIZE A VALLEY GUTTER CASTINGPER CITY STANDARDSCLEANOUTDT IE=874.748" INLETIE=877.98COORD. WITH ARCH'L,MECH'L ANDLANDSCAPE FORPLANS FOR LOWPOINTS OVER BUILDINGGENERAL UTILITY NOTES:UTILITY LEGEND:CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK UTILITY NOTES:96*5657+6'56.17+52#4-/0CivilSiteGroup.comMatt Pavek Pat Sarver763-213-3944 952-250-2003COPYRIGHT 2015 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATE DESCRIPTION PARKWAY APARTMENTS 4001 & 4025 HIGHWAY 7, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 4915 W. 35TH STREET, SUITE #102, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 SELA GROUP, LLC PROJECT 8/2/16 CITY RESUBMITTAL8/30/16 CITY RESUBMITTAL. .. .. .. .. .. .PROJECT NUMBER: 151623/11/16 CITY SUBMITTAL7/11/16 PUD RESUBMITTAL7/29/16 HUD SUBMITTAL4/18/16 PUD RESUBMITTAL6/14/16 PUD RESUBMITTALNREVISION SUMMARYDATE DESCRIPTIONC4.0UTILITY PLAN. .. .. .. .. .. .GOPHER STATE ONE CALLWWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG(800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE(651) 454-0002 LOCAL44263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.8/30/16City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance & Map Amendments for Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUDPage 21 96*5657+6'56.17+52#4-/0CivilSiteGroup.comMatt Pavek Pat Sarver763-213-3944 952-250-2003COPYRIGHT 2015 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATE DESCRIPTION PARKWAY APARTMENTS 4001 & 4025 HIGHWAY 7, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 4915 W. 35TH STREET, SUITE #102, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 SELA GROUP, LLC PROJECT 8/2/16 CITY RESUBMITTAL8/30/16 CITY RESUBMITTAL. .. .. .. .. .. .PROJECT NUMBER: 151623/11/16 CITY SUBMITTAL7/11/16 PUD RESUBMITTAL7/29/16 HUD SUBMITTAL4/18/16 PUD RESUBMITTAL6/14/16 PUD RESUBMITTALREVISION SUMMARYDATE DESCRIPTIONC5.0CIVIL DETAILS. .. .. .. .. .. .HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTN T S1FINISHED GRADEFINISHED GRADEN T SB-612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER2ACCESSIBLE PARKING PAVEMENT MARKINGN T S3ACCESSIBLE SIGN AND POSTN T SCL4CATCH BASIN/MANHOLE/RISERREMARKSCASTING SCHEDULECASTING SCHEDULEN T SSTORM CURB INLETR-3067-V11-122154" 6" MIN. 18" MIN.KEY1. TOPSOIL2. FREE DRAINING ANGULAR WASHED STONE 3/4" - 2" PARTICLE SIZE. INSTALL TO MIN. 95% STANDARD DENSITY PER AASHTO T99.TYP. SECTION DETAILNTSCONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING12"(TYP)27"12"(TYP)UNDERGROUND FILTRATION SYSTEMN T SSTORM MANHOLER-17331-3, 21, 31-325744263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.8/30/16TRENCH DRAINN T S6City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance & Map Amendments for Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUDPage 22 96*5657+6'56.17+52#4-/0CivilSiteGroup.comMatt Pavek Pat Sarver763-213-3944 952-250-2003COPYRIGHT 2015 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATE DESCRIPTION PARKWAY APARTMENTS 4001 & 4025 HIGHWAY 7, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 4915 W. 35TH STREET, SUITE #102, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 SELA GROUP, LLC PROJECT 8/2/16 CITY RESUBMITTAL8/30/16 CITY RESUBMITTAL. .. .. .. .. .. .PROJECT NUMBER: 151623/11/16 CITY SUBMITTAL7/11/16 PUD RESUBMITTAL7/29/16 HUD SUBMITTAL4/18/16 PUD RESUBMITTAL6/14/16 PUD RESUBMITTALREVISION SUMMARYDATE DESCRIPTIONC5.1CIVIL DETAILS. .. .. .. .. .. .44263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.8/30/16City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance & Map Amendments for Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUDPage 23 96*5657+6'56.17+52#4-/0CivilSiteGroup.comMatt Pavek Pat Sarver763-213-3944 952-250-2003COPYRIGHT 2015 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATE DESCRIPTION PARKWAY APARTMENTS 4001 & 4025 HIGHWAY 7, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 4915 W. 35TH STREET, SUITE #102, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 SELA GROUP, LLC PROJECT 8/2/16 CITY RESUBMITTAL8/30/16 CITY RESUBMITTAL. .. .. .. .. .. .PROJECT NUMBER: 151623/11/16 CITY SUBMITTAL7/11/16 PUD RESUBMITTAL7/29/16 HUD SUBMITTAL4/18/16 PUD RESUBMITTAL6/14/16 PUD RESUBMITTALREVISION SUMMARYDATE DESCRIPTIONC5.2CIVIL DETAILS. .. .. .. .. .. .44263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.8/30/16City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance & Map Amendments for Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUDPage 24 CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDEINLET PROTECTION AT ALLDOWNSTREAM CATCHBASINS.PERIMETER EROSIONCONTROL ATCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.INLET PROTECTION ATCATCH BASINS, TYP.96*5657+6'56.17+52#4-/0CivilSiteGroup.comMatt Pavek Pat Sarver763-213-3944 952-250-2003COPYRIGHT 2015 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATE DESCRIPTION PARKWAY APARTMENTS 4001 & 4025 HIGHWAY 7, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 4915 W. 35TH STREET, SUITE #102, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 SELA GROUP, LLC PROJECT 8/2/16 CITY RESUBMITTAL8/30/16 CITY RESUBMITTAL. .. .. .. .. .. .PROJECT NUMBER: 151623/11/16 CITY SUBMITTAL7/11/16 PUD RESUBMITTAL7/29/16 HUD SUBMITTAL4/18/16 PUD RESUBMITTAL6/14/16 PUD RESUBMITTALNREVISION SUMMARYDATE DESCRIPTIONSW1.0SWPPP - EXISTINGCONDITIONS. .. .. .. .. .. .LEGEND:EXISTING LIGHTEXISTING GAS METEREXISTING MANHOLEEXISTING CATCH BASINEXISTING GATE VALVEEXISTING HYDRANTEXISTING GAS VALVEEXISTING ELECTRIC BOXEXISTING UNDERGROUND CABLEEXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRICEXISTING STOPBOXEXISTING GAS MAINEXISTING WATER MAINEXISTING STORM SEWERCITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK EROSION CONTROL NOTES:1. THIS PROJECT IS GREATER THAN ONE ACRE AND WILL REQUIRE ANMPCA NPDES PERMIT. AN EROSION CONTROL PERMIT IS ALSOREQUIRED FROM THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK.2. SEE SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.4 FOR ALL EROSION CONTROL NOTES,DESCRIPTIONS, AND PRACTICES.3. SEE GRADING PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL GRADING AND EROSIONCONTROL NOTES.4. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION,INSPECTIONS, AND COMPLIANCE WITH NPDES PERMIT.SWPPP NOTES:GOPHER STATE ONE CALLWWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG(800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE(651) 454-0002 LOCAL44263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.8/30/16City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance & Map Amendments for Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUDPage 25 CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDEINLET PROTECTION AT ALLDOWNSTREAM CATCHBASINS.PERIMETER EROSIONCONTROL ATCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.INLET PROTECTION ATCATCH BASINS, TYP.INLET PROTECTION ATCATCH BASINS, TYP.96*5657+6'56.17+52#4-/0CivilSiteGroup.comMatt Pavek Pat Sarver763-213-3944 952-250-2003COPYRIGHT 2015 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATE DESCRIPTION PARKWAY APARTMENTS 4001 & 4025 HIGHWAY 7, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 4915 W. 35TH STREET, SUITE #102, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 SELA GROUP, LLC PROJECT 8/2/16 CITY RESUBMITTAL8/30/16 CITY RESUBMITTAL. .. .. .. .. .. .PROJECT NUMBER: 151623/11/16 CITY SUBMITTAL7/11/16 PUD RESUBMITTAL7/29/16 HUD SUBMITTAL4/18/16 PUD RESUBMITTAL6/14/16 PUD RESUBMITTALNREVISION SUMMARYDATE DESCRIPTIONSW1.1SWPPP - PROPOSEDCONDITIONS. .. .. .. .. .. .GOPHER STATE ONE CALLWWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG(800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE(651) 454-0002 LOCALCITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK EROSION CONTROL NOTES:1. THIS PROJECT IS GREATER THAN ONE ACRE AND WILL REQUIRE ANMPCA NPDES PERMIT. AN EROSION CONTROL PERMIT IS ALSOREQUIRED FROM THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK.2. SEE SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.4 FOR ALL EROSION CONTROL NOTES,DESCRIPTIONS, AND PRACTICES.3. SEE GRADING PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL GRADING AND EROSIONCONTROL NOTES.4. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION,INSPECTIONS, AND COMPLIANCE WITH NPDES PERMIT.SWPPP NOTES:44263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.8/30/16LEGEND:EXISTING LIGHTEXISTING GAS METEREXISTING MANHOLEEXISTING CATCH BASINEXISTING GATE VALVEEXISTING HYDRANTEXISTING GAS VALVEEXISTING ELECTRIC BOXEXISTING UNDERGROUND CABLEEXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRICEXISTING STOPBOXEXISTING GAS MAINEXISTING WATER MAINEXISTING STORM SEWERCity Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance & Map Amendments for Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUDPage 26 96*5657+6'56.17+52#4-/0CivilSiteGroup.comMatt Pavek Pat Sarver763-213-3944 952-250-2003COPYRIGHT 2015 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATE DESCRIPTION PARKWAY APARTMENTS 4001 & 4025 HIGHWAY 7, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 4915 W. 35TH STREET, SUITE #102, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 SELA GROUP, LLC PROJECT 8/2/16 CITY RESUBMITTAL8/30/16 CITY RESUBMITTAL. .. .. .. .. .. .PROJECT NUMBER: 151623/11/16 CITY SUBMITTAL7/11/16 PUD RESUBMITTAL7/29/16 HUD SUBMITTAL4/18/16 PUD RESUBMITTAL6/14/16 PUD RESUBMITTALREVISION SUMMARYDATE DESCRIPTIONSW1.2SWPPP - NARRATIVEAND DETAILS. .. .. .. .. .. .SELA GROUP LLC4915 W 35TH STREET, SUITE 102ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416SUPPLEMENTARY SITE SPECIFIC EROSION CONTROL NOTES:44263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.8/30/16City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance & Map Amendments for Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUDPage 27 96*5657+6'56.17+52#4-/0CivilSiteGroup.comMatt Pavek Pat Sarver763-213-3944 952-250-2003COPYRIGHT 2015 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATE DESCRIPTION PARKWAY APARTMENTS 4001 & 4025 HIGHWAY 7, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 4915 W. 35TH STREET, SUITE #102, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 SELA GROUP, LLC PROJECT 8/2/16 CITY RESUBMITTAL8/30/16 CITY RESUBMITTAL. .. .. .. .. .. .PROJECT NUMBER: 151623/11/16 CITY SUBMITTAL7/11/16 PUD RESUBMITTAL7/29/16 HUD SUBMITTAL4/18/16 PUD RESUBMITTAL6/14/16 PUD RESUBMITTALREVISION SUMMARYDATE DESCRIPTIONSW1.3SWPPP -ATTACHMENTS. .. .. .. .. .. .ATTACHMENT A: SITE SPECIFIC SWPPP DOCUMENT44263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.8/30/16City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance & Map Amendments for Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUDPage 28 96*5657+6'56.17+52#4-/0CivilSiteGroup.comMatt Pavek Pat Sarver763-213-3944 952-250-2003COPYRIGHT 2015 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATE DESCRIPTION PARKWAY APARTMENTS 4001 & 4025 HIGHWAY 7, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 4915 W. 35TH STREET, SUITE #102, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 SELA GROUP, LLC PROJECT 8/2/16 CITY RESUBMITTAL8/30/16 CITY RESUBMITTAL. .. .. .. .. .. .PROJECT NUMBER: 151623/11/16 CITY SUBMITTAL7/11/16 PUD RESUBMITTAL7/29/16 HUD SUBMITTAL4/18/16 PUD RESUBMITTAL6/14/16 PUD RESUBMITTALREVISION SUMMARYDATE DESCRIPTIONSW1.4SWPPP -ATTACHMENTS. .. .. .. .. .. .ATTACHMENT B: SWPPP INSPECTION FORMATTACHMENT C: MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR PERMANENT STORM WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM44263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.8/30/16City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance & Map Amendments for Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUDPage 29 DJRARCHITECTURE, INCCopyright 2015 DJR Architecture, IncB 8 333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.comPRINT NAMESIGNATUREREGISTRATION NUMBERDATECLIENTSELA GROUP4915 W 35th St, #102Saint Louis Park, MN 55416952.925.3878Issue:Date:Project #:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:CONTRACTORTBDSTRUCTURALTBDCIVILCIVIL SITE GROUP4931 W 35th St. Suite 200Saint Louis Park, MN 55416612-615-0060I hereby certify that this plan, specification,or report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Architect under the laws of theState of Minnesota.PRELIMINARY; NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONACDEFGH 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 LANDSCAPECONFLUENCE530 N 3RD St #120Minneapolis, MN 55401612 333-3702L1004001 & 4025 Highway 25 Saint Louis Park, MNApprover4/18/201615-06607/11/2016AuthorCheckerPARKWAY APARTMENTSDesignerPUD Resubmittal7/11/2016TREE PRESERVATION AND REPLACEMENT PLANTREE REPLACEMENT CALCULATIONS: ·A = Total diameter inches of significant trees lost as a result of land alteration or removal. ·B = Total diameter inches of significant trees situated on the land. ·C = Tree replacement constant (1.5). ·D = Replacement trees (number of caliper inches). ·((A/B)-0.20) x C x A = D SURVEY AND TREE REMOVAL NOTES: 1. BOUNDARY AND EXISTING TREE INFORMATION TAKEN FROM SURVEY ARE PREPARED BY HARRY S. JOHNSON CO. INC., BLOOMINGTON, MN AND CIVIL SITE GROUP FOR SPECIES IDENTIFICATION. 2. ST. LOUIS PARK NATURAL RESOURCE COORDINATOR PERFORMED A SITE VISIT AND VERIFICATION WITH CIVIL DESIGN GROUP FOR ALL SURVEYED TREES. TREE SPECIES AND CONDITION NOTES ON THIS PLAN. 3. ALL ONSITE TREES ANTICIPATED TO BE REMOVED. 4. SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR LOCATIONS OF REPLACEMENT TREES. 5. CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK DEFINES *SIGNIFICANT TREE: ANY TREE, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF SALIX (WILLOW), BOXELDER, SIBERIAN ELM AND BLACK LOCUST IS CONSIDERED TO BE SIGNIFICANT UNDER THE LANDSCAPING SECTION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE IF IT IS AT LEAST FIVE CALIPER INCHES FOR DECIDUOUS TREES AND SIX CALIPER INCHES FOR CONIFERS. ASPEN, COTTONWOOD OR SILVER MAPLE IS CONSIDERED SIGNIFICANT IF IT IS AT LEAST 12 INCHES IN DIAMETER AT BREAST HEIGHT-DBH. EXISTING TREE REMOVAL - ON SITE TREE REMOVAL LEGEND: ((250/250)-0.20) x 1.5 x 250 = 300 A = 250 B = 250 C = Tree replacement constant (1.5). D = 300 ·REPLACEMENT REQUIRED = 300 DIA. INCHES ·REPLACEMENT PROVIDED IN PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN (SEE L200) = 290.0 DIA. INCHES ·CAL. INCHES BELOW REPLACEMENT REQUIREMENT = 10 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance & Map Amendments for Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUD Page 30 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance & Map Amendments for Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUDPage 31 COMPACTED SUBGRADE CURB AND GUTTER, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS 1'-6" 3" SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH (SEE SPECIFICATIONS) 3 16" METAL EDGER W/ STAKE, PER SPEC.3-6" LIMESTONE ROCK MULCH EDGER 1' MINPLANTING SOIL 1 1 3 x A MIN. 30" RADIUS MIN.4"A EACH TREE SHALL BE PLANTED SUCH THAT THE ROOT FLARE IS VISIBLE AT THE TOP OF THE ROOT BALL. IF THE ROOT FLARE IS NOT VISIBLE, THE SOIL SHALL BE REMOVED IN A LEVEL MANNER FROM THE ROOT BALL TO WHERE THE FIRST MAIN ORDER ROOT (1 2" DIA. OR LARGER) EMERGES FROM THE TRUNK. SET MAIN ORDER ROOT 1" HIGHER THAN ADJACENT GRADE. DO NOT COVER TOP OF ROOT BALL WITH SOIL. SCARIFY SIDES OF TREE PIT WITH SPADE BY HAND TO BIND WITH PREPARED SOIL. PLANTING PIT TO BE TWO TO FIVE TIMES THE DIAMETER OF ROOT BALL, SLOPED TAMP SOIL AROUND ROOT BALL BASE FIRMLY WITH FOOT PRESSURE SO THAT ROOT BALL DOES NOT SHIFT. DRAINAGE TRENCH AS REQUIRED PER PERCOLATION TEST IN SPEC. AUGER A 4" DIA. HOLE & FILL W/ 3 4" GRAVEL. PLACE ROOT BALL ON UNDISTURBED OR COMPACTED SOIL. DIG PLANTING PIT 4-6" DEEPER THAN ROOTBALL. UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE. REMOVE BURLAP, WINE, ROPE AND WIRE FROM TOP HALF OF ROOT BALL. COMPACT PLANTING SOIL TO 85% OF MAXIMUM DRY UNIT WEIGHT PER ASTM D 698. EDGE CONDITION VARIES, SEE PLAN. 4" BUILT-UP EARTH SAUCER BEYOND EDGE OF ROOT BALL. 3" SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. DO NOT PLACE MULCH IN CONTACT WITH ROOT FLARE. RODENT TRUNK PROTECTION: 1 2" HARDWIRE-CLOTH MESH CYLINDER. DIMENSIONS: 8" DIAMETER (OR GREATER) X 36" HEIGHT. STAKE IN PLACE, AVOIDING ROOTS. SEE SPEC. NOTE: CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING TREES IN A PLUMB POSITION THROUGHOUT THE WARRANTY PERIOD. STAKING AND GUYING IS MANDATORY FOR TREES 4" CAL OR GREATER, AND ALL BARE ROOT TREES. WRAP TREE TRUNKS ONLY UPON APPROVAL BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. SEE SPECIFICATION SECTION 32 93 00. 5' DIAMETER MULCH RING, TYP. 3" SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH (SEE SPECIFICATIONS) FINISHED GRADE AND EDGE CONDITION VARIES - SEE PLAN FOR CONDITION. 3 16" METAL EDGER W/ STAKE, PER SPEC. SEE PLAN 12" MIN. PREPARE SOIL FOR THE ENTIRE BED 4"3" SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. DO NOT PLACE MULCH IN CONTACT WITH SHRUB STEM. NOTE: SEE SPECIFICATION SECTION RELATED TO EXTERIOR PLANTING. CONTAINER GROWN MATERIAL SHALL HAVE ROOTS HAND LOOSENED. MIN.4" DEEPER THAN ROOT BALL. SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF ENTIRE BED WITH SPADE BY HAND TO BIND WITH PLANTING SOIL. UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE.4"2"SOD SOIL FROM SOD CUTTING TOPSOIL DISCED SUBGRADE SUBGRADE SCALE FACTOR: 3"=1' STREET NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC INSITU SOILS SIDEWALK 1'-11"3 8" WASHED CRUSHED AGGREGATE. COMPACT IN LIFTS. 4'-6" TYP. SOIL MEDIUM 3" SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH (SEE SPECIFICATIONS) TYPICAL COMPRESSION FITTING AIR RELIEF VALVE AT HIGH POINT, AS INDICATED FLUSH VALVE OR CAP AT LOW END, AS NOTED. TYPICAL DRIP LINE WITH EMITTER SPACING AS NOTED. TIE DOWN STAKE AT ALL TEES, ELLS, AND AT 4' O.C. AT CLAY, 3' O.C. AT LOAM, OR 2' O.C. AT SAND. DRIPLINE SPACING AS NOTED. EMITTERS OFFSET FOR TRIANGULAR SPACING. POLYETHYLENE OR PVC HEADER MANIFOLD, SIZE AS PER "MAXIMUM FLOW PER ZONE" CHART 12" SPACING 0.6 0.9 273 155 318 169 360 230 395 255 417 285 460 290 INLET PSI 15 20 30 40 50 60 18" SPACING 0.6 0.9 314 250 353 294 413 350 465 402 528 420 596 455 24" SPACING 0.6 0.9 424 322 508 368 586 414 652 474 720 488 780 514 EMITTER FLOW RATE (GPH) MAXIMUM LATERAL LENGTH (FEET) EMITTER FLOW 0.6 GPH 0.9 GPH 12" SPACING 1.0 GPM 1.5 GPM 18" SPACING 0.67 GPM 1.0 GPM 24" SPACING 0.50 GPM 0.75 GPM FLOW PER 100 FT (GPM) MAXIMUM FLOW PER ZONE SCH. 40 PVC HEADER PIPE SIZE 1/2" 3/4" 1" 1-1/2" 2" MAX GPM* 4.7 GPM 8.3 GPM 13.5 GPM 33.9 GPM 52.4 GPM PSI LOSS** 7.7 PSI 5.6 PSI 4.2 PSI 2.9 PSI 1.9 PSI *GPM @ 5 FPS VELOCITY **LOSS PER 100 FT POLY HEADER PIPE SIZE 1/2" 3/4" 1" 1-1/2" 2" MAX GPM* 4.7 GPM 8.3 GPM 13.5 GPM 33.9 GPM 52.4 GPM PSI LOSS** 8.8 PSI 6.3 PSI 4.8 PSI 2.9 PSI 2.2 PSI GRID PRECIPITATION RATES (IN/HR) EMITTER SPACING 12 18 24 LATERAL SPACING 12 18 24 EMITTER FLOW RATE 0.6 0.9 0.96 0.69 0.28 1.44 1.03 0.41 SLOPED CONDITION NOTE: 1. DRIPLINE LATERALS SHOULD FOLLOW THE CONTOURS OF THE SLOPE WHEREVER POSSIBLE. 2. INSTALL AIR RELIEF VALVE PERPENDICULAR TO THE DRIPLINE AT ITS HIGHEST POINT. 3. SPACE ROWS NORMALLY AT THE TOP TWO-THIRDS OF THE SLOPE AND GRADUALLY INCREASE THE SPACING UP TO 25 PERCENT AS APPROACHING THE BOTTOM THIRD. 4. WHEN ELEVATION CHANGE IS 10 FEET OR MORE, ZONE THE BOTTOM OF THE SLOPE ON A SEPARATE VALVE. TYPICAL OFFSET 2" FROM HARDSCAPE, 4" FROM PLANTED AREA-TYP. PVC MAINLINE DRIP ASSEMBLY (VALVE/ FILTER/REGULATOR) TYPICAL FPT ADAPTER AND COMPRESSION COUPLER PVC LATERAL PIPE SIZED PER PLAN MAX. LENGTH OF SINGLE LATERALSEE CHARTMAX. LENGTH OF SINGLE LATERALSEE CHARTEND FEED EXAMPLE CENTER FEED EXAMPLE SEE PLANSEE PLAN SEE PLAN PVC SCH 40 TEE OR ELL PVC MANIFOLD LINE COMPRESSION ADAPTER COMPRESSION COUPLING LANDSCAPE DRIPLINE TUBING WATER SOURCE: DRIP VALVE OR LATERAL FROM VALVE LANDSCAPE DRIP TUBING PVC MANIFOLD LINE WITH PVC TEE FLUSH CAP: RAINBIRD MDCFCOUP W/ MDCFCAP AIR RELIEF VALVE: RAINBIRD AR VALVE KIT, INSTALL AT HIGH POINT OF ZONE KEY DOGBONE SHAPED CORNER SHAPED CURVED POLYGON HOURGLASS SHAPED ODD SHAPED"C" SHAPEDPOLYGON SHAPED 3" SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH (SEE SPECIFICATIONS) 1' MINIMUM DEPTH OF PLANTING SOIL CONCRETE WALKWAY CONCRETE SEAT WALL TO CONNECT TO CONCRETE DECK1'-6"1'-3" 6" TYP NOTE: SEE PLAN FOR LOCATION AND LAYOUT COORDINATE VENEER WITH ARCHITECTURE. STONE COUNTERTOP, FINISH TBD. CONCRETE SLAB BASE 3'-6"CONTROLLER WIRE WITH 30 INCH LINEAR LENGTH OF COIL, WITH PLASTIC I.D. TAG AND WATERPROOF CONNECTORS 10"x15"x12" DEPTH RECTANGULAR VALVE BOX 10"x15"x12" DEPTH RECTANGULAR VALVE BOX PVC TRUE UNION BALL VALVE 2" ABOVE FINISH GRADE AT PLANTING BEDS 3 4" ABOVE FINISH GRADE AT LAWN AREAS 2"-4"REMOTE CONTROL VALVE AS SPECIFIED PRESSURE REGULATING FILTER AS SPECIFIED PVC UNION SCH 80 RISER SxT TEE W/ 2" NIPPLE AT MAINLINE CONCRETE BRICK SUPPORT 4 TOTAL (2 ON EACH SIDE) 6" THICK LAYER OF PEA GRAVEL, INSTALLED PRIOR TO SETTING BRICK AND VALVE BOX4"12"OUTLET PIPE SAME SIZE AS VALVE, 24" MIN. LENGTH TO FIRST FITTING 45° DOWN AS REQUIRED TO LATERAL DEPTH N.T.S L500 TURF EDGING04 N.T.S L500 SOD PLANTING PLAN03 N.T.S L500 TREE PLANTING CROSS SECTION - TYPICAL07 N.T.S L500 ROCK MAINTENANCE EDGE STRIP01 N.T.S L500 TYPICAL SHRUB PLANTING05 N.T.S L500 EXTENDED TREE PLANTING ROOTING AREA02 DJRARCHITECTURE, INCCopyright 2015 DJR Architecture, IncB 8 333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.comPRINT NAMESIGNATUREREGISTRATION NUMBERDATECLIENTSELA GROUP4915 W 35th St, #102Saint Louis Park, MN 55416952.925.3878Issue:Date:Project #:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:CONTRACTORTBDSTRUCTURALTBDCIVILCIVIL SITE GROUP4931 W 35th St. Suite 200Saint Louis Park, MN 55416612-615-0060I hereby certify that this plan, specification,or report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Architect under the laws of theState of Minnesota.PRELIMINARY; NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONACDEFGH 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 LANDSCAPECONFLUENCE530 N 3RD St #120Minneapolis, MN 55401612 333-3702L5004001 & 4025 Highway 25 Saint Louis Park, MNApprover4/18/201615-0667/11/2016AuthorCheckerPARKWAY APARTMENTSDesignerPUD ReSubmittal7/11/2016LANDSCAPE DETAILSN.T.S L500 DRIP IRRIGATION06 A N.T.S L500 DOG PARK FENCE - OMEGA ARCH. PANELS W/ SQUARE POSTS10 N.T.S L500 DOG PARK - OMEGA ARCHITECTURAL SINGLE SWING GATE11 N.T.S L500 TYPICAL CONCRETE GREEN ROOF ON AMENITY DECK08 N.T.S L500 TYPICAL HIGHTOP BAR09 N.T.S L500 DRIP IRRIGATION06 A DRIP IRRIGATION NOTE: ALL DRIP TUBING SHALL BE RAINBIRD XF DRIPLINE WITH SELF-FLUSHING EMITTERS TO PREVENT CALCIUM BUILDUP. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance & Map Amendments for Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUD Page 32 OWNERCONTRACTORDORAN COMPANIES7803 GLENROY RD #200,MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55439952.288.2000ARCHITECTDJR ARCHITECTURE, INC.333 WASHINGTON AVENUE N #210MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401CONTACT: Sheldon Berg(612) 676-2719(612) 676-2796 (fax)sberg@djr-inc.comPARKWAY 25, LLC4915 W 35TH ST, #102SAINT LOUIS PARK, MN 55416952.925.3878PROJECT PARTICIPANTSSTRUCTURALMECHANICAL/ELECTRICALLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTERICKSEN ROED ANDASSOCIATES2550 UNIVERSITY AVE WST PAUL, MN 55114651.251.7570CONFLUENCE530 N 3RD ST #120MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401(612) 333-3702EMMANUELSON-PODAS, INC.7705 BUSH LAKE ROAD,EDINA, MN 55439952.930.0050PROJECT PARTICIPANTSCIVILCIVIL SITE GROUP4931 W 35TH ST SUITE 200ST LOUIS PARK, MN 55416612.615.0060UNIT SUMMARYTYPE LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 LEVEL 5 TOTALALCOVE1 000011 BEDROOM 5 12 12 12 11 521+ BEDROOM04444162 BEDROOM 0 11 11 11 9 42TOTALS6 27272724111PROJECT NOTES1. All work shall comply with all applicablestate and local codes and ordinances.2. Work is to be completed in accordancewith all documents including drawings,specifications, and conditions ofcontract for work.3. Refer to complete set of issuedcontract documents including drawingsand specifications of all disciplines forapplicable notes, abbreviations, andsymbols. Contractor is responsible forcoordination of work. Notify Architectof any discrepancies beforeproceeding with work.4. Food service for coordination only.Food service equipment and installationnot in contract.UNIT TYPE SUMMARYTYPE NET SF GROSS SF LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2-4 LEVEL 5 TOTALALCOVEV1 545 SF 609 GSF10011 BEDROOMA1 640 SF 699 GSF0103A2 658 SF 712 GSF03312A3a 679 SF 746 GSF1001A3b 659 SF 733 GSF1001A4 739 SF 807 GSF05015A5 814 SF 880 GSF03312A5a 845 SF 945 GSF1001A5b 819 SF 906 GSF1001A6 873 SF 944 GSF0022A7 880 SF 950 GSF0022A10 925 SF 1014 GSF0011A11 745 SF 792 GSF10011+ BEDROOMA3 767 SF 834 GSF0228A8 901 SF 968 GSF0114A9 890 SF 967 GSF01142 BEDROOMB1 1008 SF 1082 GSF0114B2 995 SF 1090 GSF0103B3 1056 SF 1153 GSF0114B4 1314 SF 1411 GSF0022B5 1108 SF 1210 GSF0206B6 1185 SF 1264 GSF0114B7 1183 SF 1266 GSF0206B8 1209 SF 1301 GSF0011B9 1196 SF 1275 GSF0228B10 1295 SF 1409 GSF0114TOTALS 6 27 24 111FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) CALCULATIONSNAMEAREASITE1.57 ACRES (68,565.28 SF)GROSS BUILDING142,821 SFGROSS FOOTPRINT23,329 SFFAR2.08GFAR0.34UNITS/ACRE (111/1.57)71 UNITS/ACREBUILDING AREA SUMMARYLEVEL GSFLEVEL -1 56,099 SFLEVEL 1 23,329 SFLEVEL 2 30,337 SFLEVEL 3 30,337 SFLEVEL 4 30,337 SFLEVEL 5 28,481 SFTOTALS198,920 SFPARKING 56,099 SFRESIDENTIAL134,321 SFCOMMERCIAL 8,421 SFPARKING AND BIKE RACK CALCULATIONSUNITCOUNTBR/UNIT BEDROOMSTOTAL PARKINGALCOVE11111 BEDROOM68168682 BEDROOM4228484TOTAL111153153TOTAL RESIDENTIAL PARKING REQUIRED153TOTAL RESIDENTIAL PARKING PROVIDED (IN UNDERGROUND GARAGE) 153TOTAL RESIDENTIAL GARAGE = 159 SPACES - (6 SPACES FOR COMM. PARKING)FITNESS AREA= 4,910 GSFPARKING REQ= 1 STALL/200 GSFTOTAL FITNESS PKG REQUIRED 4,669 SF/200 (SF AS DEFINED BY SLP CODE)23RESTAURANT=3,930 GSFPARKING REQ= 1 STALL/ 60 GSFTOTAL RESTAURANT PKG REQUIRED 3,783/60 (SF AS DEFINED BY SLP CODE)63REDUCTION IN PARKING FOR TRANSIT (10% OF REQUIRED SPACES) -9TOTAL COMMERCIAL PARKING REQUIRED77TOTAL COMMERCIAL PARKING PROVIDED77ON GRADE PARKING - 55 SPACESSTREET PARKING - 16 SPACESBELOW GRADE PARKING - 6 SPACESGRAND TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED230GRAND TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED230RESIDENTIAL BIKE RACKS REQUIRED= 1 PER UNIT + 1/10 PARKING STALLS 111 + (153/10)127COMMERCIAL BIKE RACKS REQUIRED= 1/10 PARKING STALLS(77/10)8TOTAL BIKE RACKS REQUIRED135TOTAL BIKE RACKS PROVIDED (132 AT LEVEL -1, 14 AT LEVEL 1) 146TRASH/ RECYCLING AREAMN BUILDING CODE 1303.1500GROSS PARKING: 56,099 x .001 = 56GROSS RESIDENTIAL: 134,321 x .0025 = 336GROSS COMMERCIAL: 8,840 x .001 = 9AREA REQUIRED: 401 SFAREA PROVIDED: 1037 SFhttps://www.revisor.mn.gov/rules/?id=1303.1500LOCATION MAPSITE LOCATIONPROJECT INFOARCHITECTHUD PROJECT NUMBER092-35812NAMEDJR ARCHITECTURE, INC.DATESIGNATURE LICENSE #XXXOWNERNAMEPARKWAY 25, LLCDATESIGNATUREXXCONTRACTORNAMEDORAN COMPANIESDATESIGNATUREXXBONDING COMPANYNAMEXDATESIGNATUREXXLICENSE #XLICENSE #XLICENSE #XARCHITECTURE, INCCopyright 2015 DJR Architecture, IncB8333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.comPRINT NAMESIGNATUREREGISTRATION NUMBER DATECLIENTPARKWAY 25, LLC4915 W 35th St, #102Saint Louis Park, MN 55416952.925.3878Issue:Date:Project #:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:CONTRACTORDORAN COMPANIES7803 Glenroy Rd #200,Minneapolis, MN 55439952.288.2000STRUCTURALERICKSEN ROED AND ASSOCIATES2550 University Avenue WSt Paul, MN 55114651-251-7570CIVILCIVIL SITE GROUP4931 W 35th St. Suite 200Saint Louis Park, MN 55416612-615-0060I hereby certify that this plan, specification,or report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Architect under the laws of theState of Minnesota.HUD REVIEW SET ONLYACDEFGH7654321LANDSCAPECONFLUENCE530 N 3RD St #120Minneapolis, MN 55401612 333-3702MECHANICAL/ ELECTRICALEMMANUELSON- PODAS, INC.7705 Bush Lake Rd,Edina, MN 55439952 930-0050G000COVER SHEET4001 & 4025 Highway 25 Saint Louis Park, MNSHELDON BERG08/30/201615-06608/30/2016APSBPARKWAY 25Designer PARKWAY 2515-066.00SAINT LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTASHEET INDEX#SHEET NAMEHUD REVIEWS200 SCHEDULES AND DETAILSS300 ENLARGED PLANSS401 FOUNDATION SECTIONS AND DETAILSS450 POST TENSIONED SECTIONS AND DETAILSS451 POST TENSIONED SECTIONS AND DETAILSS452 POST TENSIONED SECTIONS AND DETAILSS500 WOOD FRAMING SECTIONS AND DETAILSS501 WOOD FRAMING SECTIONS AND DETAILSELECTRICALE000 ELECTRICAL TITLE SHEETE001 ELECTRICAL SITE PLANE100 LIGHTING PLAN- LEVEL -1E110 LIGHTING PLAN- LEVEL 1E120 LIGHTING PLAN- LEVEL 2E130 LIGHTING PLAN- LEVEL 3E140 LIGHTING PLAN- LEVEL 4E150 LIGHTING PLAN- LEVEL 5E200 ELECTRICAL PLAN- LEVEL -1E210 ELECTRICAL PLAN- LEVEL 1E220 ELECTRICAL PLAN- LEVEL 2E230 ELECTRICAL PLAN- LEVEL 3E240 ELECTRICAL PLAN- LEVEL 4E250 ELECTRICAL PLAN- LEVEL 5E260 ELECTRICAL PLAN- ROOF LEVELE301 UNIT LARGE SCALE ELECTRICAL PLANE302 UNIT LARGE SCALE ELECTRICAL PLANE303 UNIT LARGE SCALE ELECTRICAL PLANE304 UNIT LARGE SCALE ELECTRICAL PLANE305 UNIT LARGE SCALE ELECTRICAL PLANE306 UNIT LARGE SCALE ELECTRICAL PLANE307 UNIT LARGE SCALE ELECTRICAL PLANE308 UNIT LARGE SCALE ELECTRICAL PLANE401 ENLARGED AMENITY ELECTRICAL PLANSE402 ENLARGED AMENITY ELECTRICAL PLANSE403 ENLARGED AMENITY ELECTRICAL PLANSE404 ENLARGED AMENITY ELECTRICAL PLANSE501 ELECTRICAL RISER DIAGRAME502 ELECTRICAL GROUNDING RISERE601 ELECTRICAL DETAILSE602 ELECTRICAL DETAILSE701 ELECTRICAL SCHEDULESE702 ELECTRICAL SCHEDULESE703 ELECTRICAL SCHEDULESE704 ELECTRICAL SCHEDULESE705 ELECTRICAL SCHEDULESSITE LIGHTINGSL100 SITE LIGHTINGMECHANICALM000 MECHANICAL TITLE SHEETM100 HVAC PLAN- LEVEL -1M110 HVAC PLAN- LEVEL 1M120 HVAC PLAN- LEVEL 2M130 HVAC PLAN- LEVEL 3M140 HVAC PLAN- LEVEL 4M150 HVAC PLAN- LEVEL 5M160 HVAC PLAN- ROOF LEVELM201 UNIT LARGE SCALE MECHANICAL PLANM202 UNIT LARGE SCALE MECHANICAL PLANM203 UNIT LARGE SCALE MECHANICAL PLANM204 UNIT LARGE SCALE MECHANICAL PLANM205 UNIT LARGE SCALE MECHANICAL PLANM300 PLUMBING PLAN- LEVEL -1M310 PLUMBING PLAN- LEVEL 1M320 PLUMBING PLAN- LEVEL 2M330 PLUMBING PLAN- LEVEL 3M340 PLUMBING PLAN- LEVEL 4M350 PLUMBING PLAN- LEVEL 5M360 PLUMBING PLAN- ROOF LEVELM401 PLUMBING RISER DIAGRAMSM402 PLUMBING RISER DIAGRAMSM403 PLUMBING RISER DIAGRAMSM404 PLUMBING RISER DIAGRAMSM405 PLUMBING RISER DIAGRAMSM406 PLUMBING RISER DIAGRAMSM501 MECHANICAL DETAILSM502 MECHANICAL DETAILSM503 MECHANICAL DETAILSM504 MECHANICAL DETAILSM505 MECHANICAL DETAILSM601 MECHANICAL SCHEDULESM602 MECHANICAL SCHEDULESINTERIORI111 FINISH PLAN- LEVEL 1 COMMON AREAI112 FINISH PLAN- LEVEL 2 TYPICAL CORRIDOR AREA AI113 FINISH PLAN- LEVEL 2 TYPICAL CORRIDOR AREA BI230 ENLARED FINISH PLAN- LEVEL 1 COMMON AREA 1I231 ENLARGED FINISH PLAN- LEVEL 1 COMMON AREA 2I311 LEVEL 1 REFLECTED CEILING PLAN COMMON AREA 1I312 LEVEL 1 REFLECTED CEILING PLAN COMMON AREA 2I313 LEVEL 2 REFLECTED CEILING PLAN TYP. CORRIDORI460 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS- PUBLIC SPACESI461 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS- PUBLIC SPACESI462 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS- PUBLIC SPACESI500 INTERIOR SPACE DETAILSI501 INTERIOR SPACE DETAILSI502 INTERIOR SPACE DETAILSI503 MILLWORK SECTIONSI600 MATERIAL ID AND FINISH SCHEDULEI601 MATERIAL ID AND FINISH SCHEDULEI711 FURNITURE PLANSHEET INDEX#SHEET NAMEHUD REVIEWGENERALG000 COVER SHEETG100 LIFE SAFETY- LEVEL P1G110 LIFE SAFETY- LEVEL 1G120 LIFE SAFETY- LEVEL 2-4 & 5CIVILC0.0 TITLE SHEETC0.1 SITE SURVEYC0.2 PRELIMINARY PLATC1.0 REMOVALS PLANC2.0 SITE PLANC2.1 ALLEY PLAN AND PROFILEC3.0 GRADING PLANC4.0 UTILITY PLANC5.0 DETAILSC5.1 DETAILSC5.2 DETAILSSW1.0 SWPPP - EXISTING CONDITIONSSW1.1 SWPPP - PROPOSED CONDITIONSSW1.2 SWPPP - NARRATIVE AND DETAILSSW1.4 SWPPP- NOTESSW 1.3 SWPPP- NOTESLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREL100 TREE PRESERVATION AND REPLACEMENT PLANL200 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLANL400 AMENITY DECK ENLARGEMENTL500 LANDSCAPE DETAILSL501 AMENITY DECK DETAILARCHITECTUREA000 NOTES, ABBREVIATIONS, AND SYMBOLSA100 FLOOR PLAN -1A110 FLOOR PLAN- LEVEL 1A111 SLAB DIAGRAMA120 FLOOR PLAN LEVEL 2-4A150 FLOOR PLAN LEVEL 5A160 ROOF PLANA200 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSA201 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSA202 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSA300 WALL SECTIONSA310 WALL SECTIONSA311 WALL SECTIONSA312 WALL SECTIONSA313 WALL SECTIONSA314 SECTIONSA315 SECTIONSA350 WEST STAIR PLANS & SECTIONSA351 EAST STAIR PLANS & SECTIONSA352 ELEVATOR SECTIONS & PLANSA353 TRASH CHUTE SECTION AND DETAILSA400 ENLARGED PLANS- 1ST FLOOR AMENITYA401 ENLARGED PLANSA402 ENLARGED PLANSA403 ENLARGED PLANSA404 ENLARGED PLANS AND SECTIONS - POOLA410 TYPICAL UNIT PLANSA411 TYPICAL UNIT PLANSA412 TYPICAL UNIT PLANSA413 TYPICAL UNIT PLANSA414 TYPICAL UNIT PLANSA450 INTERIOR ELEVATIONSA451 INTERIOR ELEVATIONSA500 EXTERIOR DETAILSA501 EXTERIOR DETAILSA502 EXTERIOR DETAILSA503 EXTERIOR DETAILSA504 EXTERIOR DETAILSA505 EXTERIOR DETAILSA507 EXTERIOR DETAILSA508 EXTERIOR DETAILSA510 INTERIOR DETAILSA511 INTERIOR DETAILSA550 BALCONY DETAILSA551 BALCONY DETAILSA552 BALCONY DETAILSA600 INTERIOR CONSTRUCTION ASSEMBLIESA601 EXTERIOR CONSTRUCTION ASSEMBLIESA610 DOOR, WINDOW SCHEDULE AND TYPESA620 STOREFRONT TYPESA700 RCP - LEVEL -1A710 RCP - LEVEL 1A720 RCP - LEVEL 2-4A750 RCP - LEVEL 5STRUCTURALS000 GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES AND INFORMATIONS001 TYPICAL DETAILSS002 TYPICAL DETAILSS003 TYPICAL DETAILSS004 TYPICAL DETAILSS005 TYPICAL DETAILSS006 TYPICAL DETAILSS007 TYPICAL DETAILSS101 PARKING LEVEL FOUNDATION PLANS111 LEVEL 1 FRAMING PLANS111R LEVEL 1 REINFORCING PLANS121 LEVEL 2 FRAMING PLANS121R LEVEL 2 REINFORCING PLANS131 LEVEL 3 FRAMING PLANS141 LEVEL 4 FRAMING PLANS151 LEVEL 5 FRAMING PLANS161 LEVEL 6 ROOF FRAMING PLANHUD Submittal07/28/2016City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance & Map Amendments for Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUDPage 33 FDFDFDFDFDFDFDFDFDFDFDFDFDFDFDFDFDFDFDUP1AACCEEF21063GHKLMNZAZBZCZDZEZF97Z3Z4ZZZ54DDZ2BB18' - 0"24' - 0"91' - 0"18' - 0"42' - 0"18' - 0"24' - 0"10' - 0"F3A300PB1A300P190' - 7 1/2"62' - 5 1/2"45' - 8"298' - 9"8J1PARKING159 SPACES104' - 6"194' - 3"298' - 9"12' - 6"11' - 0"27' - 6"162' - 0"QUICKCHARGEELECTRICCARSTATIONBIKE REPAIRELECTRICAL& MAKE UPAIRFIRST FLOORABOVELEVEL 2-5ABOVEWATER/SPRINKLERTWALL MOUNTEDBIKE RACK, TYP.WALL MOUNTEDSTORAGE AT THEHEAD OF EACHSTALL, TYP.RGARAGE ACCESS RAMPPROPERTYLINESTORAGE,TYPRAMP UPAREAWELLELEVLOBBYZ6Z7Z85H1A300POWNERSTORAGEBIKERACKSTENANT STORAGEZ1TENANT STORAGE31' - 1"FIRST FLOORABOVELEVEL 2-5ABOVESTORAGEFIRST FLOORABOVEPOOL ABOVEHOT TUBABOVEBEAMABOVE8.75.1ZG2' - 0"DOGWASHA202E1A202D3QUICKCHARGEELECTRICCARSTATION1A404F1A3144.71A3142A314G1A314D5A300E1A314BOLLARDSBOLLARDS1.4A.1E3A202A202G6A50262 3 4 56 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1617C18C19C2021222324252627282930313233343536C37C38C39404142434445C46C47C4849505152535455565758596061626364C6665797877767574737271706968678182838084858687899091929394959697989988100C101102103104105106107108109110111112115114113116117C129128127126125124123122121120119130118131132 133134135136137C138C139140141142143144147148149150151152145146153154155156157158159ARCHITECTURE, INCCopyright 2015 DJR Architecture, IncB8333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.comPRINT NAMESIGNATUREREGISTRATION NUMBER DATECLIENTPARKWAY 25, LLC4915 W 35th St, #102Saint Louis Park, MN 55416952.925.3878Issue:Date:Project #:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:CONTRACTORDORAN COMPANIES7803 Glenroy Rd #200,Minneapolis, MN 55439952.288.2000STRUCTURALERICKSEN ROED AND ASSOCIATES2550 University Avenue WSt Paul, MN 55114651-251-7570CIVILCIVIL SITE GROUP4931 W 35th St. Suite 200Saint Louis Park, MN 55416612-615-0060I hereby certify that this plan, specification,or report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Architect under the laws of theState of Minnesota.HUD REVIEW SET ONLYACDEFGH7654321LANDSCAPECONFLUENCE530 N 3RD St #120Minneapolis, MN 55401612 333-3702MECHANICAL/ ELECTRICALEMMANUELSON- PODAS, INC.7705 Bush Lake Rd,Edina, MN 55439952 930-0050A100PFLOOR PLAN - LEVEL -1 (PLANNING)4001 & 4025 Highway 25 Saint Louis Park, MNApprover08/30/201615-06608/30/2016AuthorCheckerPARKWAY 25Designer 3/32" = 1'-0"B1FLOOR PLAN- LEVEL -1NHUD Preliminary Submittal03/4/2016PUD Submittal03/14/2016PUD Resubmittal04/18/2016PUD Second Resubmittal05/12/2016PUD Third Resubmittal6/15/2016PUD Fourth Resubmittal07/11/2016City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance & Map Amendments for Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUDPage 34 FDFDA200E1A200H1A201H5A200E5Fitness1,245 SFCommunity1,814 SFM125 SFW156 SFOffice228 SFBusinessConference207 SFLobby2,959 SFA201D3A201H3A201E1A200F4COMMERCIALTENANT1POOLHOT TUBMail159 SF30 PARKING SPACES24' - 8"41' - 0 1/2"222' - 0 1/2"SETBACK14' - 1 1/32"AREAWELL105' - 4"PROPERTYLINELEVEL 2ABOVELEVEL 2ABOVE1 3 ' - 6 " 4 6 ' - 5 1 /4" 5 ' - 0 "GARAGEACCESS RAMP25 PARKINGSPACES263' - 1"EAST STAIRWEST STAIR137' - 4"TRANSFORMERTRASH CHUTESSETBACK72' - 11 3/4"EXTERIOR PATIOCOMMERCIALTENANT21BR740 SFCONC. PATIOW/ METAL FENCE10(4) INVERTEDU STYLEBIKE PARKINGCVEHICLE SHARESERVICE101BR658 SF1BR841 SF1BR867 SFEXTENT OFUNDERGROUNDPARKING GARAGECC CPool Storage199 SF(3) INVERTED U STYLEBIKE PARKINGCCACCESS ALLEYLINE OF PARKINGGARAGE BELOWRAILINGMTL RAILING5'-0" FENCE4,910 GSF3,930 GSFMETAL TRELLISSEE LANDSCAPEDWGSLEVEL 2ABOVETRASH56 SFBARHENNEPIN COUNTYSIGNAL BOX TO BERELOCATEDArea WellTRENCHDRAINTRANSFORMERDOG PARK5.0%4.8%4.2%4.2%NANAWALLSRESTRICTED ACCESSGATEDOGRUNA201F1A202G61BR659 SFALCOVE546 SF11116114ARCHITECTURE, INCCopyright 2015 DJR Architecture, IncB8333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.comPRINT NAMESIGNATUREREGISTRATION NUMBER DATECLIENTPARKWAY 25, LLC4915 W 35th St, #102Saint Louis Park, MN 55416952.925.3878Issue:Date:Project #:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:CONTRACTORDORAN COMPANIES7803 Glenroy Rd #200,Minneapolis, MN 55439952.288.2000STRUCTURALERICKSEN ROED AND ASSOCIATES2550 University Avenue WSt Paul, MN 55114651-251-7570CIVILCIVIL SITE GROUP4931 W 35th St. Suite 200Saint Louis Park, MN 55416612-615-0060I hereby certify that this plan, specification,or report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Architect under the laws of theState of Minnesota.HUD REVIEW SET ONLYACDEFGH7654321LANDSCAPECONFLUENCE530 N 3RD St #120Minneapolis, MN 55401612 333-3702MECHANICAL/ ELECTRICALEMMANUELSON- PODAS, INC.7705 Bush Lake Rd,Edina, MN 55439952 930-0050A110PFLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 1 (PLANNING)4001 & 4025 Highway 25 Saint Louis Park, MNApprover08/30/201615-06608/30/2016AuthorCheckerPARKWAY 25Designer 3/32" = 1'-0"B1FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 1NHUD Preliminary Submittal03/4/2016PUD Submittal03/14/2016PUD Resubmittal04/18/2016PUD Second Resubmittal05/12/2016PUD Third Resubmittal6/15/2016PUD Fourth Resubmittal07/11/2016City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance & Map Amendments for Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUDPage 35 LEVEL 1100' - 0"LEVEL 2116' - 0"LEVEL 3126' - 7 7/8"LEVEL 4137' - 3 3/4"LEVEL 5147' - 11 5/8"ACET.O. PARAPET161' - 7"DBPREFINISHED METALPARAPETMETAL PANEL 1METAL PANEL 2ALUMINUM BALCONIESWITH GLASS RAILINGSSTONE VENEERPREFINISHED METALWRAPPED COLUMNCONCRETE COLUMNALUMINIUM STOREFRONTA1A313PREFINISHED METAL CANOPYC1A313T.O. OVERHANGINGROOF163' - 1 3/4"B2A313T.O SLAB @ EASTTENANT97' - 8"26' - 7 7/8"B1A313NANA WALLSYSTEMA.1ABCDEFGHLEVEL 1100' - 0"LEVEL 2116' - 0"LEVEL -188' - 8"LEVEL 3126' - 7 7/8"LEVEL 4137' - 3 3/4"TRUSS BEARING158' - 0 3/4"LEVEL 5147' - 11 5/8"6397T.O. PARAPET161' - 7"STONE VENEERMETAL PANEL 1METAL PANEL 2ALUMINUM BALCONIESWITH GLASS RAILINGSPREFINISHED METALPARAPETPREFINISHED METALPARAPET CAPCONCRETE COLUMNS85A1A300C1A312T.O. OVERHANGINGROOF163' - 1 3/4"BRICK VENEERSTUCCOT.O SLAB @ EASTTENANT97' - 8"4.7LEVEL 1100' - 0"LEVEL 2116' - 0"LEVEL 3126' - 7 7/8"LEVEL 4137' - 3 3/4"TRUSS BEARING158' - 0 3/4"LEVEL 5147' - 11 5/8"12637T.O. PARAPET161' - 7"4PREFINISHED METALPARAPETMETAL PANEL 1PREFINISHED METALPARAPET CAPALUMINUM BALCONIESWITH GLASS RAILINGSSTONE VENEERFIBERGLASS WINDOW@ RESIDENTIAL UNITSMETAL PANEL 285D1A310B1A310C1A310T.O. OVERHANGINGROOF163' - 1 3/4"STUCCOSTONE VENEERT.O SLAB @ EASTTENANT97' - 8"ALUMINUM RAILINGALUMINUM RAILWITH GLASSINFILLBIKE PARKINGSTONE CAP2A3141.4ALUM STOREFRONTLEVEL 1100' - 0"LEVEL 2116' - 0"LEVEL 3126' - 7 7/8"LEVEL 4137' - 3 3/4"TRUSS BEARING158' - 0 3/4"LEVEL 5147' - 11 5/8"ZAZBZCZDZEZFT.O. PARAPET161' - 7"PREFINISHED METALPARAPETPREFINISHED METALWRAPPED COLUMNSMETAL PANEL 1METAL PANEL 2ALUMINUM BALCONIESWITH GLASS RAILINGSSTONE VENEERALUMINIUM STOREFRONTCONCRETE COLUMND1A313T.O. OVERHANGINGROOF163' - 1 3/4"10' - 1 1/8"10' - 7 7/8"10' - 7 7/8"10' - 7 7/8"16' - 0"A1A311T.O SLAB @ EASTTENANT97' - 8"ZGA1A31212' - 0"LEVEL 1100' - 0"LEVEL 2116' - 0"LEVEL 3126' - 7 7/8"LEVEL 4137' - 3 3/4"LEVEL 5147' - 11 5/8"T.O. PARAPET161' - 7"T.O. OVERHANGINGROOF163' - 1 3/4"T.O SLAB @ EASTTENANT97' - 8"18' - 4"10' - 7 7/8"10' - 7 7/8"10' - 7 7/8"13' - 7 3/8"4"9 @ 16" EACH12' - 0"1' - 0"13 @ 12" EACH13' - 0"7 7/8"10 @ 12" EACH10' - 0"7 7/8"10 @ 12" EACH10' - 0"7 7/8"10 @ 12" EACH10' - 0"7 7/8"5 @ 12" EACH4' - 11 1/2"TRUSS BEARING158' - 0 3/4"LEVEL 5147' - 11 5/8"ZAZBZCZDZET.O. PARAPET161' - 7"T.O. OVERHANGINGROOF163' - 1 3/4"3' - 0"3' - 0"EQEQEQEQEQNOTE: METAL PANEL SPACING TO ALIGN WITH EDGE OF WINDOWS AND CENTER OVERMULLION, EXCEPT AT PATIO DOOR TYPE 2, SPACE EQUALLY BETWEEN MAX 3'-8"EQEQEQPD2PD1PD2METAL PANEL 1PAVERS OVER SHIM SPACERWITH SLOPED INSULATIONTO ROOF DRAINFIBERGLASS PATIO DOOR ANDSIDELITESFIBERGLASS FIXED WINDOWEQEQA505B3EDMETAL PANEL 1PREFINISHED METALWRAPPED COLUMNEQEQPD2ARCHITECTURE, INCCopyright 2015 DJR Architecture, IncB8333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.comPRINT NAMESIGNATUREREGISTRATION NUMBER DATECLIENTPARKWAY 25, LLC4915 W 35th St, #102Saint Louis Park, MN 55416952.925.3878Issue:Date:Project #:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:CONTRACTORDORAN COMPANIES7803 Glenroy Rd #200,Minneapolis, MN 55439952.288.2000STRUCTURALERICKSEN ROED AND ASSOCIATES2550 University Avenue WSt Paul, MN 55114651-251-7570CIVILCIVIL SITE GROUP4931 W 35th St. Suite 200Saint Louis Park, MN 55416612-615-0060I hereby certify that this plan, specification,or report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Architect under the laws of theState of Minnesota.HUD REVIEW SET ONLYACDEFGH7654321LANDSCAPECONFLUENCE530 N 3RD St #120Minneapolis, MN 55401612 333-3702MECHANICAL/ ELECTRICALEMMANUELSON- PODAS, INC.7705 Bush Lake Rd,Edina, MN 55439952 930-0050A200EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS4001 & 4025 Highway 25 Saint Louis Park, MNSHELDON BERG08/30/201615-06608/30/2016APSBPARKWAY 25Designer 3/32" = 1'-0"H1NORTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION C- CSAH 25 3/32" = 1'-0"E5WEST EXTERIOR ELEVATION A 3/32" = 1'-0"E1EAST EXTERIOR ELEVATION D- GLENHURST AVE 3/32" = 1'-0"F4NORTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION- B 1/4" = 1'-0"H3ELEVATION - STONE PATTERNHUD Submittal07/28/2016 3/32" = 1'-0"1NORTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION B - 5TH FLOOR 3/32" = 1'-0"H2NORTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION C - 5TH FLOORCity Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance & Map Amendments for Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUDPage 36 LEVEL 1100' - 0"LEVEL 2116' - 0"LEVEL 3126' - 7 7/8"LEVEL 4137' - 3 3/4"TRUSS BEARING158' - 0 3/4"LEVEL 5147' - 11 5/8"12637T.O. PARAPET161' - 7"4PREFINISHED METALPARAPETBRICK VENEERMETAL PANEL 2METAL PANEL 1ALUMINIUM BALCONIESWITH ALUMINUM RAILINGSALUMINIUM STOREFRONT85STUCCO 1T.O. OVERHANGINGROOF163' - 1 3/4"SOLDIER COURSE1.4LEVEL 1100' - 0"LEVEL 2116' - 0"LEVEL 3126' - 7 7/8"LEVEL 4137' - 3 3/4"TRUSS BEARING158' - 0 3/4"LEVEL 5147' - 11 5/8"6397T.O. PARAPET161' - 7"C1A350PREFINISHED METALPARAPETMETAL PANEL 1STUCCO 1ALUMINIUM BALCONIESWITH ALUMINUM RAILINGSBRICK VENEERCONCRETE COLUMN85METAL PANEL 2A1A300T.O. OVERHANGINGROOF163' - 1 3/4"92' - 7"101' - 7"13' - 0"102' - 0"SOLDIER COURSELEVEL 1100' - 0"LEVEL 2116' - 0"LEVEL 3126' - 7 7/8"LEVEL 4137' - 3 3/4"TRUSS BEARING158' - 0 3/4"LEVEL 5147' - 11 5/8"ACEFGHKLMT.O. PARAPET161' - 7"DBPREFINISHED METALPARAPETMETAL PANEL 1ALUMINIUM BALCONIESWITH GLASS RAILINGSSTUCCOMETAL PANEL 2STUCCO 1ALUMINIUM STOREFRONTNANAWALLCONCRETE COLUMNJB1A311D1A311T.O. OVERHANGINGROOF163' - 1 3/4"STUCCOBRICK VENEERALUMINIUM BALCONIESWITH ALUMINUM RAILINGSA5A300G5A300A1A310F1A314LEVEL 1100' - 0"LEVEL 2116' - 0"LEVEL 3126' - 7 7/8"LEVEL 4137' - 3 3/4"TRUSS BEARING158' - 0 3/4"LEVEL 5147' - 11 5/8"ZAZBZCZDZET.O. PARAPET161' - 7"METAL PANEL 1PREFINISHED METALPARAPETSTUCCO 1ALUMINIUM BALCONIESWITH ALUMINUMRAILINGSALUMINIUMSTOREFRONTNANAWALLT.O. OVERHANGINGROOF163' - 1 3/4"A1A311D1A3121A40412' - 0"LEVEL 1100' - 0"LEVEL 2116' - 0"LEVEL 3126' - 7 7/8"LEVEL 4137' - 3 3/4"LEVEL 5147' - 11 5/8"T.O. PARAPET161' - 7"T.O. OVERHANGINGROOF163' - 1 3/4"ARCHITECTURE, INCCopyright 2015 DJR Architecture, IncB8333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.comPRINT NAMESIGNATUREREGISTRATION NUMBER DATECLIENTPARKWAY 25, LLC4915 W 35th St, #102Saint Louis Park, MN 55416952.925.3878Issue:Date:Project #:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:CONTRACTORDORAN COMPANIES7803 Glenroy Rd #200,Minneapolis, MN 55439952.288.2000STRUCTURALERICKSEN ROED AND ASSOCIATES2550 University Avenue WSt Paul, MN 55114651-251-7570CIVILCIVIL SITE GROUP4931 W 35th St. Suite 200Saint Louis Park, MN 55416612-615-0060I hereby certify that this plan, specification,or report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Architect under the laws of theState of Minnesota.HUD REVIEW SET ONLYACDEFGH7654321LANDSCAPECONFLUENCE530 N 3RD St #120Minneapolis, MN 55401612 333-3702MECHANICAL/ ELECTRICALEMMANUELSON- PODAS, INC.7705 Bush Lake Rd,Edina, MN 55439952 930-0050A201EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS4001 & 4025 Highway 25 Saint Louis Park, MNSHELDON BERG08/30/201615-06608/30/2016APSBPARKWAY 25Designer 3/32" = 1'-0"H3EXTERIOR ELEVATION F 3/32" = 1'-0"E1EXTERIOR ELEVATION H 3/32" = 1'-0"H5EXTERIOR ELEVATION E 3/32" = 1'-0"D3EXTERIOR ELEVATION GHUD Submittal07/28/2016 3/32" = 1'-0"F1ELEVATOR LOBBY ELEVATIONCity Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance & Map Amendments for Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUDPage 37 RAMP DOWNPOOLMN 7 SERVICE ROADGLENHURST AVENUE SCOMMERCIAL PARKING 30 SPACESPROPERTYLINEPROPERTYLINE6 ON STREETPARKING STALLSSETBACK LEVEL 247' - 7 3/4"DOG PARKAIR EXHAUSTWELLAIR INTAKEWELLPLAZA/SEATINGTRANSFORMERTRANSFORMERLINE OFBUILDINGABOVE18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"5'-0" FENCETYP9' - 0"AMENITYHOT TUBCOMMERCIAL 14000 GSFLOBBY/ AMMENITY1811 GSFINGLEWOOD AVENUE SPHASE IIPHASE IPHASE IIPHASE I4,000 SF COMMERCIAL45 UNITSSHARED COMMERCIAL LOT56 SPACES1BR8840 GSF COMMERCIAL111 UNITSVEHICLE SHARESERVICEPROPERTY LINE3 ON STREET PARKING SPACES1101125263233434456PHASE IIGREEN SPACEBIKEPARKINGSTORAGEALLEYPARKING PHASE ICOMMERCIAL SPACES REQ'D PHASE 1 -86 SPACES (63 RESTAURANT + 23 FITNESS) - 10% TRANSIT REDUCTION = 77 SPACES REQ'DUNDERGROUND PARKINGRESIDENTIAL- 153 SPACESCOMMERCIAL- 6 SPACESON GRADEEAST LOT - 30 SPACESWEST LOT - 25 SPACESSHARED PARKING AGREEMENT- 15 SPACESSTREET PARKINGGLENHURST - 6 SPACESMN 7 SERVICE ROAD- 10 SPACESCOMMERCIAL TOTALPROVIDED - 92 SPACESREQUIRED - 77 SPACESPARKING PHASE IICOMMERCIAL SPACES REQ'D PHASE 1 -85 SPACES (63 RESTAURANT + 23 FITNESS) - 10% TRANSIT REDUCTION = 77 SPACES REQ'DCOMMERCIAL SPACES REQ'D PHASE 2 -16 SPACES (16 COMMERCIAL) - 10% TRANSIT REDUCTION = 15 SPACES REQ'DTOTAL COMMERCIAL SPACES REQ'D= 92 SPACES REQ'DUNDERGROUND PARKINGCOMMERCIAL- 6 SPACESON GRADEEAST LOT- 30 SPACESWEST LOT- 56 SPACESSTREET PARKINGGLENHURST - 6 SPACESMN 7 SERVICE ROAD- 19 SPACESINGLEHART- 3 SPACESCOMMERCIAL TOTALPROVIDED - 120 SPACESREQUIRED - 92 SPACES10 ON STREETPARKING STALLSRESTAURANT3,930 GSF63 SPACES REQ'D(AS DEFINED BY SLP CODE)FITNESS4,910 GSF23 PARKINGSPACED REQ'D(AS DEFINED BY SLP CODE)9 ON STREETPARKING STALLS2BR1292GSF2BR1202GSF1BR829GSF1BR829GSF1BR821GSFSTUDIO593GSF2BR1115SF1BR744GSF1BR744GSFGREEN ROOFRAMP DOWNPOOLMN 7 SERVICE ROADGLENHURST AVENUE SCOMMERCIAL PARKING30 SPACESPROPERTYLINE6 ON STREETPARKING STALLSSETBACK LEVEL 247' - 7 3/4"DOG PARKAIR EXHAUSTWELLAIR INTAKEWELLPLAZA/SEATINGTRANSFORMERTRANSFORMERLINE OFBUILDINGABOVE18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"5'-0" FENCETYP9' - 0"RESTAURANT3,930 GSF63 SPACES REQ'D(AS DEFINED BY SLP CODE)AMENITYHOT TUBINGLEWOOD AVENUE SEXISTINGPHASE IEXISTINGPHASE I1BR8840 GSF COMMERCIAL111 UNITSVEHICLE SHARESERVICEPROPERTY LINEFITNESS4,910 GSF23 PARKINGSPACED REQ'D(AS DEFINED BY SLP CODE)11012BIKEPARKINGSTORAGE1325EXISTING BUILDINGCOMMERCIAL PARKING18 SPACES*20 WITH RESTRIPPINGAND ADDT'L PARKINGCOMMERCIAL PARKING10 SPACESALLEY18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"COMMERCIAL PARKING25 SPACESTYP8' - 6"COMMERCIAL PARKING25 SPACES10 ON STREETPARKING STALLSARCHITECTURE, INCCopyright 2015 DJR Architecture, IncB8333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.comPRINT NAMESIGNATUREREGISTRATION NUMBERDATECLIENTPARKWAY 25, LLC4915 W 35th St, #102Saint Louis Park, MN 55416952.925.3878Issue:Date:Project #:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:CONTRACTORDORAN COMPANIES7803 Glenroy Rd #200,Minneapolis, MN 55439952.288.2000STRUCTURALERICKSEN ROED AND ASSOCIATES2550 University Avenue WSt Paul, MN 55114651-251-7570CIVILCIVIL SITE GROUP4931 W 35th St. Suite 200Saint Louis Park, MN 55416612-615-0060I hereby certify that this plan, specification,or report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Architect under the laws of theState of Minnesota.HUD REVIEW SET ONLYACDEFGH7654321LANDSCAPECONFLUENCE530 N 3RD St #120Minneapolis, MN 55401612 333-3702MECHANICAL/ ELECTRICALEMMANUELSON- PODAS, INC.7705 Bush Lake Rd,Edina, MN 55439952 930-0050AS100ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN4001 & 4025 Highway 25 Saint Louis Park, MNApprover08/30/201615-06608/30/2016AuthorCheckerPARKWAY 25Designer 1" = 30'-0"B1ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLANN 1" = 30'-0"F6Phase II- Level 2-5 1" = 30'-0"B4ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLANPUD Second Resubmittal05/12/2016Design Development/ Pricing5/18/2016PUD Third Resubmittal6/15/2016PUD Fourth Resubmittal07/11/2016City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance & Map Amendments for Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUDPage 38 # Date CommentsRevisionsThese drawings are for conceptual use onlyand are not intended for construction. Valuesrepresented are an approximation generated frommanufacturers photometric inhouse or independentlab tests with data supplied by lamp manufacturers.Date:7/11/201624x36Scale: 1" = 20'Parkway 25Site LightingLS952-2064Drawn By: Joe FreySales Agent: Steve HahnScale: 1 inch= 20 Ft.RAMP DOWNPOOLMN 7 SERVICE ROADGLENHURST AVENUE SCOMMERCIAL PARKING 26 SPACESPROPERTYLINEPROPERTYLINE6 ON STREETPARKING STALLSCOMMERCIALPARKING 26SPACESSETBACK LEVEL 248' - 0"URBAN PLAZA/DROP-OFFBIKEPARKINGCOMMERCIALTRASHDOG PARKSETBACK53' - 0"AIR EXHAUSTWELLAIR INTAKEWELL5' - 0"10' - 0"PLAZA/SEATINGTRANSFORMERTRANSFORMERLINE OFBUILDINGABOVE18' - 0"25' - 0"18' - 0"5'-0" FENCEMWPOOLEQUIPTYP9' - 0"COMMERCIALTRASHOFFICEOFFICECOFFEEAMENITY9 ON STREETPARKING SPACESTRANSFORMERBARBIKEPARKINGHOTTUBCMH: 10MH: 10CCMH: 10MH: 10CCMH: 10CMH: 10CMH: 10DMH: 3.5DMH: 3.5DMH: 3.5DMH: 3.5MH: 3.5DMH: 10BBMH: 10MH: 10CCMH: 10MH: 10CDMH: 3.5MH: 3.5DEMH: 13MH: 13EEMH: 13MH: 13EMH: 13EEMH: 13MH: 13EAAAMH: 18MH: 18AAAMH: 18AAABMH: 10MH: 18AAA0.24 0.23 0.17 0.20 0.23 0.25 0.24 0.30 0.44 0.33 0.29 0.20 0.13 0.05 0.05 0.10 0.23 0.42 0.59 1.00 1.47 1.48 1.03 0.67 0.51 0.50 0.54 0.71 1.14 1.54 1.38 0.91 0.53 0.36 0.18 0.07 0.030.59 0.73 0.57 0.51 0.61 0.77 0.77 1.14 3.74 5.21 5.13 3.67 0.73 0.13 0.08 0.14 0.38 1.00 1.53 1.73 2.03 1.99 1.75 1.54 1.20 0.91 1.31 1.60 2.07 2.10 1.88 1.57 1.43 0.87 0.32 0.11 0.050.92 1.67 1.62 0.84 1.15 1.76 1.92 1.665.81 6.17 4.87 4.80 0.55 0.12 0.09 0.18 0.84 1.98 2.03 1.95 1.97 2.00 2.09 1.06 0.48 1.21 2.16 1.99 1.99 1.90 2.00 1.84 0.74 0.15 0.07 0.041.20 1.88 2.04 1.18 1.35 3.40 4.89 2.706.31 0.95 0.16 0.13 0.17 0.50 0.90 1.31 1.48 1.50 1.43 1.07 0.65 0.35 0.63 0.97 1.37 1.49 1.45 1.30 0.90 0.42 0.11 0.07 0.061.70 2.17 1.96 1.50 1.47 3.63 5.16 2.866.73 3.67 3.92 2.56 0.91 0.18 0.20 0.30 0.33 0.41 0.54 0.58 0.46 0.20 0.14 0.22 0.31 0.30 0.32 0.30 0.19 0.11 0.10 0.21 0.222.11 2.44 1.92 1.75 1.73 2.66 2.85 2.509.63 6.47 7.11 6.28 2.51 0.30 0.10 0.07 0.08 0.18 0.63 1.51 1.76 0.18 0.07 0.05 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.02 0.19 1.04 1.012.13 2.93 2.29 1.76 1.79 2.52 2.67 2.391.410.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.07 0.61 4.31 7.85 0.75 0.120.39 4.61 3.331.95 3.39 3.23 1.56 1.59 3.64 5.09 2.940.76 2.36 2.08 1.38 0.28 0.13 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.37 6.57 22.48 2.23 0.151.27 18.84 7.171.98 3.34 3.26 1.56 1.60 3.73 5.25 2.961.27 4.93 18.98 17.29 8.54 0.52 0.06 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.33 6.70 29.78 3.18 0.231.37 21.12 5.772.02 2.84 2.34 1.77 1.77 2.69 2.87 2.520.88 2.24 6.38 13.96 12.56 3.20 0.65 0.11 0.03 0.03 0.41 4.80 11.71 1.57 0.701.19 17.40 7.032.11 2.40 1.92 1.77 1.75 2.41 2.55 2.290.15 0.14 0.36 1.27 2.96 1.72 0.48 0.10 0.04 0.10 0.56 1.93 2.76 1.63 3.040.37 4.16 3.171.82 2.21 1.93 1.52 1.47 3.51 4.91 2.870.01 0.02 0.01 0.07 0.46 0.57 0.22 0.07 0.04 0.11 0.29 0.55 0.70 2.93 11.100.27 1.79 1.821.24 1.99 2.01 1.14 1.35 3.55 5.09 2.810.00 0.01 0.02 0.09 0.15 0.09 0.04 0.03 0.05 0.10 0.14 0.30 7.36 21.710.35 4.15 3.580.98 1.77 1.63 0.82 1.19 2.14 2.40 2.000.02 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.20 5.75 18.490.97 17.53 8.690.63 0.74 0.59 0.54 0.680.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.05 0.14 2.43 7.601.01 19.59 6.670.26 0.24 0.18 0.24 0.030.01 0.03 0.04 0.83 1.911.01 17.70 9.020.11 0.10 0.08 0.03 0.020.39 5.79 5.160.05 0.05 0.04 0.09 0.19 0.10 0.203.57 5.16 4.180.64 9.38 6.820.06 0.22 0.95 3.41 4.53 2.54 2.19 2.63 6.27 6.17 1.86 1.50 2.361.51 21.41 9.615.76 17.73 27.41 24.80 2.50 1.85 2.28 10.60 3.41 3.39 5.62 4.53 1.731.53 22.31 9.659.52 3.20 1.12 0.90 1.13 1.40 2.22 9.99 3.22 2.02 2.01 2.82 4.380.59 9.07 6.530.42 0.51 0.62 0.84 1.22 1.43 3.37 4.50 3.54 6.61 4.50 1.80 1.68 3.62 5.050.17 2.79 4.330.27 0.45 0.66 0.93 1.19 1.69 8.78 2.95 1.58 1.51 3.00 3.65 3.30 0.110.24 2.32 10.310.40 0.52 0.78 1.57 3.63 2.23 1.65 1.40 1.26 1.21 1.11 0.90 0.95 0.59 0.04 0.05 0.21 5.95 21.751.77 8.64 18.87 10.89 4.01 0.73 0.50 0.61 1.63 3.53 2.73 0.12 0.07 0.19 5.30 20.4916.97 13.61 2.98 0.73 0.28 1.76 12.04 12.86 0.43 0.11 0.16 1.71 9.050.55 0.17 1.44 13.29 18.16 0.49 0.08 0.06 0.79 2.2316.00 15.82 0.40 0.07 0.03 0.22 0.430.06 0.02 0.06Luminaire ScheduleSymbolQtyLabelArrangementLumensLLFDescriptionLum. WattsTotal Watts3BSINGLEN.A.0.850MaxLite - QM2AU7T350WPB 10'MH56.521169.563Calculation SummaryLabelCalcTypeUnitsAvgMaxMinAvg/MinMax/MinSiteIlluminanceFc2.6429.78LPD Area SummaryLabelAreaTotal WattsLPD0.00N.A.N.A.ParkingIlluminanceFcSite856762631.4460.0311.577.850.01157.00785.0010CSINGLEN.A.0.850LSi - XDLMB-3-LED-SS-CW-UE-BRZ-SA4-S-12'MH136.513657DSINGLEN.A.0.850LSi - XBVR-ID-LED-24-400-CW-UE-BRZ 42in MH382667ESINGLEN.A.0.850LSi - XSL2-5A-LED-50-HO-CW-120-WHT-CMT-13'MH86.4604.84AAASINGLEN.A.0.850MaxLite - QM2AU7T350PMB 18'MH56.521226.084City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance & Map Amendments for Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUDPage 39 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance & Map Amendments for Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUD Page 40 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance & Map Amendments for Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUDPage 41 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance & Map Amendments for Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUDPage 42 0HPRUDQGXP 21(&$5/6213$5.:$<68,7(_0,11($32/,601__:::65)&2168/7,1*&20 65)1R 7R 6HDQ:DOWKHU3ODQQLQJ =RQLQJ6XSHUYLVRU &LW\RI6W/RXLV3DUN )URP 0DWWKHZ3DF\QD3(6HQLRU$VVRFLDWH %UHQW&ODUN(,7(QJLQHHU 'DWH $XJXVW 6XEMHFW 5HYLVHG3DUNZD\7UDIILF6WXG\ ,QWURGXFWLRQ 65)KDVFRPSOHWHGDUHYLVHGWUDIILFVWXG\IRUWKHSURSRVHG3DUNZD\PL[HGXVHGHYHORSPHQW ORFDWHGQHDUWKH&6$+0LQQHWRQND%RXOHYDUGLQWHUVHFWLRQLQ6W/RXLV3DUN01 VHH)LJXUH 3URMHFW/RFDWLRQ 7KHPDLQREMHFWLYHVRIWKLVVWXG\DUHWRUHYLHZH[LVWLQJRSHUDWLRQVZLWKLQWKHVWXG\ DUHD HYDOXDWH WUDIILF LPSDFWV WR WKH DGMDFHQW URDGZD\ QHWZRUN DQG UHFRPPHQG DQ\ QHFHVVDU\ LPSURYHPHQWV WR DFFRPPRGDWH WKH SURSRVHG GHYHORSPHQW 7KH IROORZLQJVHFWLRQVSURYLGHWKH DVVXPSWLRQVDQDO\VLVDQGVWXG\FRQFOXVLRQVRIIHUHGIRUFRQVLGHUDWLRQ ([LVWLQJ&RQGLWLRQV 7KHH[LVWLQJFRQGLWLRQVZHUHUHYLHZHGWRHVWDEOLVKDEDVHOLQHLQRUGHUWRLGHQWLI\DQ\IXWXUHLPSDFWV DVVRFLDWHGZLWKWKHSURSRVHGGHYHORSPHQW'XHWRRQJRLQJFRQVWUXFWLRQDWWKH01+LJKZD\ 01+LJKZD\LQWHUFKDQJHWUDIILFGDWDFROOHFWHGIRUWKH+LJKZD\DQG*OHQKXUVW0L[HG8VH7UDIILF6WXG\ GDWHG0D\ ZDVXWLOL]HGWRHVWDEOLVKH[LVWLQJFRQGLWLRQVZLWKLQWKHVWXG\DUHD+RZHYHUSHDN SHULRGWXUQLQJPRYHPHQWSHGHVWULDQFRXQWVZHUHFROOHFWHGE\65)WKHZHHNRI0DUFKDW WKH&6$+)URQWDJH5RDG,QJOHZRRG$YHQXHLQWHUVHFWLRQWRHVWDEOLVKJHQHUDOWUDYHOSDWWHUQVDQG PDJQLWXGHV QHDU WKH SURSRVHG GHYHORSPHQW 7KLV GDWD ZDV PRGLILHG DFFRUGLQJO\ WR UHIOHFW QRQFRQVWUXFWLRQFRQGLWLRQV+LVWRULFDODQQXDODYHUDJHGDLO\WUDIILF $$'7 YROXPHVLQWKHVWXG\DUHD ZHUHSURYLGHGE\WKH0LQQHVRWD'HSDUWPHQWRI7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ 0Q'27 ,QDGGLWLRQREVHUYDWLRQVZHUHFRPSOHWHGWRLGHQWLI\URDGZD\FKDUDFWHULVWLFVZLWKLQWKHVWXG\DUHD LH URDGZD\ JHRPHWU\ SRVWHG VSHHG OLPLWV DQG WUDIILF FRQWUROV &XUUHQWO\ &6$+ DQG 0LQQHWRQND%RXOHYDUGDUHIRXUODQHGLYLGHGURDGZD\VZLWKDSRVWHGVSHHGOLPLWRIPLOHVSHUKRXU PSK LQWKHLPPHGLDWHVWXG\DUHD2WKHUVWXG\DUHDURDGZD\VDUHUHODWLYHO\ORZVSHHGWZRODQH VWUHHWV,WVKRXOGEHQRWHGWKDW&6$+DQG0LQQHWRQND%RXOHYDUGDUHIXQFWLRQDOO\FODVVLILHGDV PLQRUDUWHULDOVZKLOH)UDQFH$YHQXH QRUWKRI&6$+ LVIXQFW LRQDOO\FODVVLILHGDVDFROOHFWRU2WKHU VWXG\URDGZD\VDUHIXQFWLRQDOO\FODVVLILHGDVORFDOVWUHHWV([LVWLQJJHRPHWULFVWUDIILFFRQWUROVDQG YROXPHVZLWKLQWKHVWXG\DUHDDUHVKRZQLQ)LJXUH City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance & Map Amendments for Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUD Page 43 $SULO3URMHFW/RFDWLRQ)LJXUH+ ?3URMHFWV? ? ?76?)LJXUHV?)LJB3URMHFW/RFDWLRQFGU3DUNZD\7UDIILF6WXG\6W/RXLV3DUN013URMHFW/RFDWLRQ1257+1RUWK/DNH6W0LQQHWRQND%OYG&6$+3URSRVHG6RXWKZHVW/573URSRVHG:/DNH6W6WDWLRQ)UDQFH$YHVW6W*OHQKXUVW$YH,QJOHZRRG$YH0LQQHDSROLV6W/RXLV3DUN&6$+)URQWDJH5G$GMDFHQW'HYHORSPHQW 7KH6KRUHKDPCity Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance & Map Amendments for Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUDPage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ity Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance & Map Amendments for Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUDPage 45 6HDQ:DOWKHU3ODQQLQJ =RQLQJ6XSHUYLVRU$XJXVW &LW\RI6W/RXLV3DUN5HYLVHG3DUNZD\7UDIILF6WXG\ 3DJH 7KHIROORZLQJWUDIILFFRQWUROLVFXUUHQWO\LQSODFHDWVWXG\LQWHUVHFWLRQV &6$+)UDQFH$YHQXH 7UDIILFVLJQDO &6$+)URQWDJH5RDG)UDQFH$YHQXH 6LGHVWUHHWVWRSFRQWURO o)UDQFH$YHQXHDSSURDFKHVDUHXQFRQWUROOHG &6$+)URQWDJH5RDG*OHQKXUVW$YHQXH 8QFRQWUROOHG o7KH+LJKZD\DQG*OHQKXUVW0L[HG8VH7UDIILF6WXG\UHFRPPHQGHGWKHLPSOHPHQWDWLRQRI VWRSFRQWURORQWKHQRUWKERXQGLQWHUVHFWLRQDSSURDFK *OHQKXUVW$YHQXH &6$+)URQWDJH5RDG,QJOHZRRG$YHQXH 7KUHHZD\VWRSFRQWURO o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ity Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance & Map Amendments for Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUD Page 46 6HDQ:DOWKHU3ODQQLQJ =RQLQJ6XSHUYLVRU$XJXVW &LW\RI6W/RXLV3DUN5HYLVHG3DUNZD\7UDIILF6WXG\ 3DJH 5HVXOWV RI WKH H[LVWLQJ LQWHUVHFWLRQ FDSDFLW\ DQDO\VLV VKRZQ LQ 7DEOH LQGLFDWH WKDW DOO VWXG\ LQWHUVHFWLRQVFXUUHQWO\RSHUDWHDWDQDFFHSWDEOHRYHUDOO/26&RUEHWWHUGXULQJWKHDPDQGSPSHDN KRXUV+RZHYHUVHYHUDOTXHXLQJLVVXHVZHUHREVHUYHGDWWKH&6$+)UDQFH$YHQXHVLJQDOL]HG LQWHUVHFWLRQ:HVWERXQGTXHXHVDORQJ&6$+ZHUHRFFDVLRQDOO\REVHUYHGWRH[WHQGWKURXJKWKH DGMDFHQWVLJQDOL]HGLQWHUVHFWLRQDW'UHZ$YHQXHGXULQJWKHDPSHDNKRXU6LPLODUO\HDVWERXQG TXHXHV DORQJ &6$+ ZHUH RFFDVLRQDOO\ REVHUYHG WR H[WHQG WKURXJKWKHDGMDFHQWVLJQDOL]HG LQWHUVHFWLRQDW0LQQHWRQND%RXOHYDUGGXULQJWKHSPSHDNKRXU 7DEOH([LVWLQJ,QWHUVHFWLRQ&DSDFLW\$QDO\VLV ,QWHUVHFWLRQ$03HDN+RXU 303HDN+RXU /26 'HOD\ /26 'HOD\ &6$+DQG)UDQFH$YHQXH& VHF & VHF &6$+)URQWDJH5RDGDQG)UDQFH$YHQXH $$ VHF $$ VHF &6$+)URQWDJH5RDGDQG*OHQKXUVW$YHQXH $$ VHF $$ VHF &6$+)URQWDJH5RDGDQG,QJOHZRRG$YHQXH $$ VHF $$ VHF ,QGLFDWHVDQXQVLJQDOL]HGLQWHUVHFWLRQZLWKVLGHVWUHHWVWRSFRQWUROZKHUHWKHRYHUDOO/26LVVKRZQIROORZHGE\WKHZRUVWDSSURDFK /267KHGHOD\VKRZQUHSUHVHQWVWKHZRUVWVLGHVWUHHWDSSURDFKGHOD\ 8QFRQWUROOHGLQWHUVHFWLRQWUHDWHGDVDVLGHVWUHHW\LHOGFRQWUROLQWHUVHFWLRQIRUWKHSXUSRVHRIWKHFDSDFLW\DQDO\VLV 4XHXHVRQWKHQRUWKERXQGDSSURDFKRIWKH&6$+)UDQFH$YHQXHLQWHUVHFWLRQUHJXODUO\H[WHQGHG WRWKH&6$+)URQWDJH5RDGGXULQJERWKSHDNKRXUV7KHVHQRUWKERXQGTXHXHVDUHDUHVXOWRI OLPLWHGYHKLFXODUVWRUDJHGXHWRWKHFORVHO\VSDFHG&6$+)URQWDJH5RDGUDWKHUWKDQDQLQWHUVHFWLRQ FDSDFLW\LVVXH1RRWKHUVLJQLILFDQWGHOD\RUTXHXLQJLVVXHVZHUHREVHUYHGLQWKHILHOGRUWUDIILF VLPXODWLRQ DW WKH VWXG\ LQWHUVHFWLRQV ,W VKRXOG EH QRWHG WKDWTXHXLQJLVVXHVLGHQWLILHGDWWKH &6$+ )UDQFH $YHQXH LQWHUVHFWLRQ DUH H[LVWLQJ LVVXHV DQG QRWUHODWHG WR WKH SURSRVHG GHYHORSPHQW $UHD'HYHORSPHQW ,QDGGLWLRQWRWKHSURSRVHGGHYHORSPHQWDQDGMDFHQWPL[HGXVHGHYHORSPHQWORFDWHGLPPHGLDWHO\WR WKHHDVWDFURVV*OHQKXUVW$YHQXHLVXQGHUFRQVWUXFWLRQLQWKH\HDU7KHVHWZRGHYHORSPHQWV FRPELQHGKDYHWKHSRWHQWLDOWRLPSDFWIXWXUHWUDIILFRSHUDWLRQVZLWKLQWKHVWXG\DUHD $GMDFHQW'HYHORSPHQW 7KHDGMDFHQWPL[HGXVHGHYHORSPHQWKHUHLQUHIHUUHGWRDVWKH´6KRUHKDPµDQGVKRZQSUHYLRXVO\LQ )LJXUHVDQGLVORFDWHGLQWKHVRXWKHDVWTXDGUDQWRIWKH&6$+ )URQWDJH 5RDG *OHQKXUVW$YHQXH LQWHUVHFWLRQ LQ6W/RXLV3DUN7KH6KRUHKDPLV H[SHFWHG WR FRQVLVW RI DSSUR[LPDWHO\DSDUWPHQWXQLWVDQGVTXDUHIHHWRIJHQHUDOPHGLFDORIILFHVSDFHZLWK FRPSOHWLRQDQWLFLSDWHGLQODWHRUHDUO\,PSDFWVDVVRFLDWHGZLWKWKLVGHYHORSPHQWZHUH SUHYLRXVO\LGHQWLILHGDVSDUWRIWKH+LJKZD\DQG*OHQKXUVW0L[HG8VH7UDIILF6WXG\ City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance & Map Amendments for Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUD Page 47 6HDQ:DOWKHU3ODQQLQJ =RQLQJ6XSHUYLVRU$XJXVW &LW\RI6W/RXLV3DUN5HYLVHG3DUNZD\7UDIILF6WXG\ 3DJH 3URSRVHG'HYHORSPHQW 7KH3DUNZD\GHYHORSPHQWLVORFDWHGLQWKHVRXWKZHVWTXDGUDQWRIWKH&6$+)URQWDJH5RDG *OHQKXUVW$YHQXHLQWHUVHFWLRQLQ6W/RXLV3DUN7KHGHYHORSPHQWVLWHLVFXUUHQWO\RFFXSLHGE\WZR ODQGXVHVWKH9DOX6WD\,QQPRWHODQG9HVFLR·V&XFLQD UHVWDXUDQWFORVHGDWWKHWLPHRIWKLVVWXG\ 7KHVHODQGXVHVDUHSODQQHGWREHHOLPLQDWHGE\WKHSURSRVHGGHYHORSPHQWVKRZQLQ)LJXUHZKLFK FRQVLVWVRIDSSUR[LPDWHO\DSDUWPHQWXQLWVVTXDUHIHHWRIILWQHVV\RJDVWXGLRVSDFHDQG VTXDUHIHHWRIUHVWDXUDQWVSDFH7KHUHVWDXUDQWZLOOKDYHDIRFXVRQEUHDNIDVWDQGEUXQFKEXW ZLOOEHRSHQGXULQJWKHHYHQLQJVIRUGLQQHU&RQVWUXFWLRQRIWKHSURSRVHGGHYHORSPHQWZDVDVVXPHG WREHFRPSOHWHE\WKHHQGRIWKH\HDU $FFHVVWRWKHGHYHORSPHQWLVSURSRVHGDWWKHIROORZLQJORFDWLRQV •&6$+)URQWDJH5RDG aIHHWZHVWRI*OHQKXUVW$YHQXH :HVW$FFHVV •*OHQKXUVW$YHQXH aIHHWVRXWKRI&6$+)URQWDJH5RDG (DVW$FFHVV 7KUHHVLWHDFFHVVHVFXUUHQWO\H[LVWDORQJWKH&6$+)URQWDJH5RDGDQGWZRVLWHDFFHVVHVFXUUHQWO\ H[LVWDORQJ*OHQKXUVW$YHQXH8SRQFRPSOHWLRQRIWKHSURSRVHGGHYHORSPHQWRQO\RQHDFFHVVZLOO UHPDLQDORQJERWKWKH&6$+)URQWDJH5RDGDQG*OHQKXUVW$YHQXH7KHUHIRUHWKHSURSRVHG GHYHORSPHQWUHSUHVHQWVDQHWGHFUHDVHRIWKUHHDFFHVVHV%RWKRQDQGRIIVWUHHWSDUNLQJLVDOVR SURSRVHG)XUWKHUGLVFXVVLRQUHJDUGLQJVLWHDFFHVVDQGSDUNLQJLVGRFXPHQWHGODWHULQWKLVVWXG\ <HDU&RQGLWLRQV 7RKHOSGHWHUPLQHLPSDFWVDVVRFLDWHGZLWKWKH6KRUHKDPDQG3DUNZD\GHYHORSPHQWVWUDIILF IRUHFDVWV ZHUH GHYHORSHG IRU \HDU FRQGLWLRQV LH RQH \HDU DIWHU DQWLFLSDWHG FRPSOHWLRQ <HDUFRQGLWLRQVWDNHLQWRDFFRXQWJHQHUDODUHDEDFNJURXQGJURZWKDQGWUDIILFJHQHUDWHGE\WKH 6KRUHKDPDQG3DUNZD\GHYHORSPHQWV7KHHYDOXDWLRQRI\HDUFRQGLWLRQVLQFOXGHVGHWDLOVRQ WKHWUDIILFIRUHFDVWVDQGDQLQWHUVHFWLRQFDSDFLW\DQDO\VLV 7UDIILF)RUHFDVWV 7RDFFRXQWIRUJHQHUDOEDFNJURXQGJURZWKLQWKHDUHDDQDQQXDOJURZWKUDWHRIRQHKDOISHUFHQWZDV DSSOLHGWRWKHH[LVWLQJSHDNKRXUWUDIILFYROXPHVWRGHYHORS\HDUEDFNJURXQGIRUHFDVWV7KLV JURZWKUDWHLVFRQVLVWHQWZLWKKLVWRULFDOJURZWKLQWKHVWXG\DUHD EDVHGRQ0Q'27$$'7YROXPHV 7RDFFRXQWIRUWUDIILFLPSDFWVDVVRFLDWHGZLWKWKH6KRUHKDPDQG3DUNZD\GHYHORSPHQWVWULS JHQHUDWLRQHVWLPDWHVIRUERWKWKHH[LVWLQJDQGSURSRVHGODQGXVHVZHUHGHYHORSHGIRUWKHDPDQG SPSHDNKRXUVDQGDGDLO\EDVLV7KHVHHVWLPDWHVVKRZQLQ7DEOHZHUHGHYHORSHGXVLQJILHOG REVHUYDWLRQVDQGWKH,7(7ULS*HQHUDWLRQ0DQXDO1LQWK(GLWLRQ7KHH[LVWLQJWULSJHQHUDWLRQHVWLPDWHV ZHUHGHYHORSHGWRSURYLGHDFRPSDULVRQEHWZHHQH[LVWLQJDQGSURSRVHGODQGXVHVDQGWRGHWHUPLQH WKHDSSUR[LPDWHQXPEHURIQHWQHZURDGZD\V\VWHPWULSV City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance & Map Amendments for Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUD Page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ity Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance & Map Amendments for Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUDPage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·V&XFLQDZDVRSHQGXULQJ\HDUWUDIILFGDWDFROOHFWLRQIRUWKH+LJKZD\DQG*OHQKXUVW0L[HG8VH7UDIILF6WXG\ 7KHDSSURYHG3ODQQHG8QLW'HYHORSPHQW 38' LQFOXGHVGZHOOLQJXQLWVDQLQFUHDVHIURPWKHGZHOOLQJXQLWVDVVXPHGIRUWKH +LJKZD\DQG*OHQKXUVW0L[HG8VH7UDIILF6WXG\ $VVXPHVSHUFHQWRIWKHOLYHZRUNXQLWVDUHVSHFLDOW\UHWDLOXVHV7KHDPSHDNKRXUUHSUHVHQWVSHUFHQWRIWKHSPSHDNKRXU City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance & Map Amendments for Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUD Page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ity Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance & Map Amendments for Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUD Page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ity Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance & Map Amendments for Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUDPage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ity Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance & Map Amendments for Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUDPage 53 6HDQ:DOWKHU3ODQQLQJ =RQLQJ6XSHUYLVRU$XJXVW &LW\RI6W/RXLV3DUN5HYLVHG3DUNZD\7UDIILF6WXG\ 3DJH 1RRWKHUVLJQLILFDQWGHOD\RUTXHXLQJLVVXHVZHUHREVHUYHGLQWKHWUDIILFVLPXODWLRQDWWKHVWXG\ LQWHUVHFWLRQV,WVKRXOGEHQRWHGWKDWQRFDSDFLW\LVVXHVZHUHLGHQWLILHGLQDTXDOLWDWLYHUHYLHZRIWKH SURSRVHG DFFHVV ORFDWLRQV *LYHQ WKH PLQLPDO DQWLFLSDWHG LPSDFW FDXVHG E\ WKH 6KRUHKDP DQG 3DUNZD\GHYHORSPHQWVRQVWXG\DUHDWUDIILFRSHUDWLRQVQRURDGZD\LPSURYHPHQWVDUHQHHGHG IURPDWUDIILFRSHUDWLRQVSHUVSHFWLYH 6LWH3ODQ$FFHVV5HYLHZ $UHYLHZRIWKHSURSRVHGVLWHSODQZDVFRPSOHWHGWRLGHQWLI\DQ\LVVXHVDQGUHFRPPHQGSRWHQWLDO LPSURYHPHQWVZLWKUHJDUGWRVLWHDFFHVVWUDIILFFLUFXODWLRQSDUNLQJDQGSHGHVWULDQFRQQHFWLYLW\7KH IROORZLQJLQIRUPDWLRQVXPPDUL]HVWKHILQGLQJV 6LWH$FFHVV 6LQFHWKHSURSRVHGDFFHVVORFDWLRQVDUHH[SHFWHGWRRSHUDWHDGHTXDWHO\ZLWKRXWDQ\DSSDUHQWVDIHW\ LVVXHVDQGUHSUHVHQWDQHWGHFUHDVHLQDFFHVVWKHSURSRVHGDFFHVVORFDWLRQVDUHFRQVLGHUHGDSSURSULDWH 7UDIILF&LUFXODWLRQ 7UXFNWXUQLQJPRYHPHQWVVKRXOGEHUHYLHZHGWRHQVXUHWKDWJDUEDJHGHOLYHU\WUXFNVKDYHDGHTXDWH DFFRPPRGDWLRQVWRQHJRWLDWHLQWHUQDOSDUNLQJORWDLVOHV7KHPRYHPHQWRIJHQHUDOSDVVHQJHUYHKLFOHV ZLWKLQWKHSDUNLQJORWVLVQRWH[SHFWHGWREHDQLVVXH 3DUNLQJ 3DUNLQJJHQHUDWLRQHVWLPDWHVVKRZQLQ7DEOHZHUHFRPSOHWHGIRUWKHSURSRVHGGHYHORSPHQWXVLQJ WKH,7(3DUNLQJ*HQHUDWLRQ0DQXDO)RXUWK(GLWLRQ%DVHGRQWKH,7(DYHUDJHDQGWKSHUFHQWLOHSHDN SDUNLQJ UDWHV WKH SURSRVHG GHYHORSPHQW LV H[SHFWHG WR JHQHUDWHDSHDNSDUNLQJGHPDQGRI DSSUR[LPDWHO\WRYHKLFOHV7KHFXUUHQWVLWHSODQSURSRVDOVKRZVSDUNLQJVSDFHVLQDQ XQGHUJURXQGUDPS UHVLGHQWSDUNLQJ DQGVXUIDFHSDUNLQJORWVSDFHV FRPPHUFLDOSDUNLQJ IRUD WRWDORIRIIVWUHHWSDUNLQJVSDFHV*LYHQWKHSHUFHQWPXOWLXVHDQGSHUFHQWPRGDOUHGXFWLRQV DQWLFLSDWHGIRUVLWHJHQHUDWHGWULSVWKHSHDNSDUNLQJGHPDQGRQVLWHLVH[SHFWHGWREHQHDUWKH ,7(DYHUDJH7KHUHIRUHWKHSURSRVHGSDUNLQJFDSDFLW\RIVSDFHVLVH[SHFWHGWREHDGHTXDWH 7DEOH3DUNLQJ*HQHUDWLRQ(VWLPDWHV /DQG8VH7\SH ,7(&RGH 6L]H,7($YHUDJH 3HDN3DUNLQJ'HPDQG ,7(WK3HUFHQWLOH 3HDN3DUNLQJ'HPDQG /RZ0LG5LVH$SDUWPHQW 'ZHOOLQJ8QLWV )LWQHVV&HQWHU 6TXDUH)HHW 5HVWDXUDQW 6TXDUH)HHW 77RWDO3HDN3DUNLQJ'HPDQG 1R,7(SHDNSDUNLQJUDWHVDYDLODEOHIRU$SDUWPHQW ODQGXVH/RZ0LG5LVH$SDUWPHQW UDWHVVXEVWLWXWHG City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance & Map Amendments for Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUD Page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ity Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance & Map Amendments for Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUD Page 55 6HDQ:DOWKHU3ODQQLQJ =RQLQJ6XSHUYLVRU$XJXVW &LW\RI6W/RXLV3DUN5HYLVHG3DUNZD\7UDIILF6WXG\ 3DJH 6XPPDU\DQG&RQFOXVLRQV 7KHIROORZLQJVWXG\VXPPDU\DQGFRQFOXVLRQVDUHRIIHUHGIRU\RXUFRQVLGHUDWLRQ 5HVXOWVRIWKHH[LVWLQJLQWHUVHFWLRQFDSDFLW\DQDO\VLVLQGLFDWHWKDWDOOVWXG\LQWHUVHFWLRQVFXUUHQWO\ RSHUDWHDWDQDFFHSWDEOHRYHUDOO/26&RUEHWWHUGXULQJWKHDPDQGSPSHDNKRXUV+RZHYHU VHYHUDOTXHXLQJLVVXHVZHUHREVHUYHGDWWKH&6$+)UDQFH$YHQXHVLJQDOL]HGLQWHUVHFWLRQ D :HVWERXQGTXHXHVDORQJ&6$+RFFDVLRQDOO\H[WHQGHGWKURXJKWKHDGMDFHQWVLJQDOL]HG LQWHUVHFWLRQDW'UHZ$YHQXHGXULQJWKHDPSHDNKRXU E (DVWERXQGTXHXHVDORQJ&6$+RFFDVLRQDOO\H[WHQGHGWKURXJKWKHDGMDFHQWVLJQDOL]HG LQWHUVHFWLRQDW0LQQHWRQND%RXOHYDUGGXULQJWKHSPSHDNKRXU F 1RUWKERXQG)UDQFH$YHQXHTXHXHVUHJXODUO\H[WHQGHGWRWKH&6$+)URQWDJH5RDGGXULQJ ERWKSHDNKRXUV7KHVHQRUWKERXQGTXHXHVDUHDUHVXOWRIOLPLWHGYHKLFXODUVWRUDJHGXHWRWKH FORVHO\VSDFHG&6$+)URQWDJH5RDGUDWKHUWKDQDQLQWHUVHFWLRQFDSDFLW\LVVXH 7KH 3DUNZD\ PL[HGXVH GHYHORSPHQW LV SURSRVHG LQ WKH VRXWKZHVW TXDGUDQW RI WKH &6$+)URQWDJH5RDG*OHQKXUVW$YHQXHLQWHUVHFWLRQLQ6W/RXLV3DUNZKLFKLVFXUUHQWO\ RFFXSLHGE\WZRODQGXVHVWKDWDUHSODQQHGWREHHOLPLQDWHG7KHFXUUHQWVLWHSODQFRQVLVWVRI DSSUR[LPDWHO\DSDUWPHQWXQLWVVTXDUHIHHWRIILWQHVV\RJDVWXGLRVSDFHDQG VTXDUHIHHWRIUHVWDXUDQWVSDFH&RQVWUXFWLRQRIWKHSURSRVHGGHYHORSPHQWZDVDVVXPHGWREH FRPSOHWHE\WKHHQGRIWKH\HDU$FFHVVWRWKHGHYHORSPHQWLVSURSRVHGDWWKHIROORZLQJ ORFDWLRQV D &6$+)URQWDJH5RDG aIHHWZHVWRI*OHQKXUVW$YHQXH :HVW$FFHVV E *OHQKXUVW$YHQXH a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ity Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance & Map Amendments for Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUD Page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ity Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance & Map Amendments for Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUD Page 57 August 31, 2016 Parkway 25 Re: Parking Management Plan Description Parking for the project is divided into two different uses – Residential and Commercial with four different types of parking to provide parking to those uses. Residential Parking Methodology: All resident parking will be provided in the underground garage. Resident parking will be via assigned parking spaces in the garage with opportunities for bike parking either at the parking space or in bike racks in the building. All residential vehicles will be registered with on-site management. No inoperable or vehicular storage will be allowed on site or in the neighborhood. Visitor parking spaces will be signed in the surface lot for temporary parking and prospective tenants. Commercial Parking Methodology: There is a combination of off-street parking, underground parking, on street parking (immediately adjacent to the property) and a signed parking agreement with the adjacent parcel to the west that can provide an additional 15 parking spaces (or more on the weekends) above the required parking space that are accommodated at the property. Commercial Parking Standards: Commercial staff will utilize the (6) parking spaces in the underground garage. Designated restaurant parking will be signed in the south parking lot. No overnight employee parking will be allowed Restaurant intends to use valet to maximize parking potential and utilize adjacent lot parking. On site manager available to assist commercial tenants, residents, and neighbors with parking needs/questions and monitor the 6 underground parking spaces General Parking Plan: Onsite management will enforce parking requirements for commercial and residential parking Signage will help guide patrons and visitors to appropriate parking spaces No overnight commercial parking will be allowed. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance & Map Amendments for Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUD Page 58 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance & Map Amendments for Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUDPage 59 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance & Map Amendments for Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUDPage 60 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance & Map Amendments for Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUDPage 61 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance & Map Amendments for Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUDPage 62 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance & Map Amendments for Parkway 25 Preliminary & Final PUDPage 63 Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: September 6, 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Second Reading of 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development Applications RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to approve Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance creating Section 36-268-PUD 6 of the Zoning Code and amending the Zoning Map from C-2 to PUD 6 for property located at 1601 Utica Avenue South and approve the Ordinance Summary for Publication. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Is the rezoning consistent with the Comprehensive Plan? SUMMARY: Approval would allow construction of an 11-story, 335,710 square foot Class A office tower and a 7-level, 1,214 stall parking structure. This development is the fourth phase of the Central Park West PUD and features a 3,200 square foot ground floor coffee shop/deli, outdoor meeting space, a fitness facility, 114 space indoor bike storage room and locker rooms. The developer is not requesting city assistance. The Planned Unit Development (PUD) is a rezoning of the property and zoning text amendment under the City’s PUD ordinance. Staff has determined the rezoning to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the proposed use of the property. The Planning Commission recommended approval on July 20, 2016. The St. Louis Park City Council approved the first reading of the Ordinance on August 15, 2016. Golden Valley City Council approved the first reading of the Ordinance on August 16, 2016 and the second reading is scheduled for September 6, 2016. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion Ordinance Ordinance Summary Official Exhibits Prepared by: Nicole Mardell, Associate Planner Reviewed by: Sean Walther, Planning & Zoning Supervisor Approved by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director Consent Agenda Item: 4f City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Page 2 Title: Second Reading of 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development Applications DISCUSSION REQUEST: Ryan Companies and Excelsior Group are requesting a Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development and administrative amendment to a PUD to construct an 11-story, Class A office tower. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The proposed redevelopment site lies southwest of Highway 100 and Interstate 394. The site is designated as Phase IV of the Central Park West PUD and lies within the cities of St. Louis Park and Golden Valley. The office tower is within the City of St. Louis Park boundary, and the parking lot is primarily in Golden Valley. SITE INFORMATION: Site Area: 3.54 acres Zoning: O - Office Comprehensive Plan: O - Office Neighborhood: Blackstone Current Use: Parking Lot/Vacant Land Proposed Use: Office Proposed Zoning: PUD – Planned Unit Development SITE LOCATION MAP: SURROUNDING LAND USES: North: Six-story apartment building (under construction), future hotel, and future apartments. East: Lilac Drive, Highway 100 South: Parking, HealthPartners building West: Utica Avenue South, 1550 and 1600 Office Towers City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Page 3 Title: Second Reading of 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development Applications BACKGROUND: This site is designated as Phase IV of the larger Central Park West PUD approved in 2015 and already has a variety of agreements in place to control access, parking, and civic space. The 10 West End development as proposed by the applicant includes an 11-story office tower with a 1,214 space, 7-level parking structure. The parking structure is primarily located in Golden Valley. A small section of a skyway and covered loading dock straddles the municipal border. The building will connect to the Central Park West shared linear park and will provide additional bike access to the building’s bike room, fitness space, and employee locker rooms. Phase V of Central Park West is planned to expand on the proposed parking structure and include a similar office tower. The ramp is planned to be expanded to approximately 2,500 spaces with the addition of the Phase V office building. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: An Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) was conducted for the West End area in 2007 and was updated in 2013. The purpose of the AUAR was to analyze five scenarios for development in the West End and determine the impact of the development on a wide variety of environmental impacts as required by state statute. Among the environmental impacts analyzed were traffic generation and transportation improvements, impact to natural systems, and provision of utilities to the site including sewer and water. The 2007 AUAR Report identified several mitigation strategies, and most were implemented as part of the first phase of the West End Redevelopment. At that time, certain thresholds were also established in the AUAR for traffic generation, water use, and sanitary sewer use, which the City continues to monitor as each phase develops. To analyze the 10 West End application, the City hired Kimley Horn and Associates to review the AUAR and compare the impacts of the proposed land use changes to the scenario(s) previously studied. The final report from Kimley Horn and Associates dated July 7, 2016 determined that the proposed 10 West End development met the thresholds for sewer, water, and traffic and no mitigation is necessary at this time. The report did recommend traffic counts after the construction of 10 West End and prior to construction of the planned south tower and parking structure addition. A memorandum of the study findings is attached for your review. PUD ANALYSIS: Description The developer requests approval of the preliminary and final Planned Unit Development. Uses The proposed uses on site are 315,280 square feet of leasable office space including 3,200 square feet of some combination of retail, food service, coffee shop, or restaurant use, which will be allowed through the Planned Unit Development (PUD) rezoning. Comprehensive Plan The Comprehensive Plan and the current Zoning Map designate the site for Office. The proposed PUD would create a new zoning district and zoning regulations for uses and dimensional standards that are unique to this site and the proposed development plans. Staff finds that this site is suitable for the proposed office tower and meets many of the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. The site provides ample recreation space for employees through shared linear civic space to the north of the site, as well as a fitness space, indoor bike room, and employee locker rooms. The office use provides a service complementary to the planned City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Page 4 Title: Second Reading of 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development Applications improvements for the overall Central Park West Planned Unit Development and the existing commercial land use in the area. The development is consistent with previously approved redevelopment plans for the area and within the parameters of the environmental analysis for this area. Building and Site Design Analysis Ryan Companies plans to pursue LEED Certification for this building which aligns well with the PUD ordinance goals for building and site design. The ordinance requires the City to find that the quality of building and site design proposed will substantially enhance aesthetics of the site and implement relevant goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. In addition, the following criteria shall be satisfied: (1) The design shall consider the project as a whole, and shall create a unified environment within project boundaries by ensuring architectural compatibility of all structures, efficient vehicular and pedestrian circulation, aesthetically pleasing landscape and site features, and design and efficient use of utilities. Staff finds the plan meets this requirement. (2) The design of a PUD shall achieve compatibility of the project with surrounding land uses, both existing and proposed, and shall minimize the potential adverse impacts of the PUD on surrounding land uses and the potential adverse effects of the surrounding land uses on the PUD. Staff finds this criteria will be met. (3) A PUD shall comply with the City’s Green Building Policy. This is a condition of approval. The architect is working with Xcel Energy, Centerpoint Energy, and the City of St. Louis Park to comply. (4) The use of green roofs or white roofs and on-site renewable energy is encouraged. The plan currently features a thermoplastic polyolefin (TPO) white roof and partial green roof, planters, and patio pavers on the rooftop gathering space located above the loading dock and adjacent to the second floor conference rooms. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Page 5 Title: Second Reading of 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development Applications ZONING ANALYSIS: The following table provides the development metrics. Lot 2, Block 1 and Outlot A will be rezoned to a Planned Unit Development (PUD). The proposed performance and development standards in the draft ordinance and proposed development plans will establish the development requirements for this property if approved. Zoning Compliance Table: Factor Required Proposed Met? Use Office Office and up to 3,200 sq. ft. of commercial Yes Lot Area 2.0 acres, or less with City Council approval 3.54 acres Yes Height No maximum with PUD 173 feet Yes Building Materials Minimum of 60% Class I materials Each Elevation: 94.6% Class I, 5.4% Class II Yes Floor Area Ratio None with PUD 2.15 Yes Ground Floor Area Ratio N/A 0.2 Yes Off-Street Parking Office between 200,000 square feet and 400,000 square feet: 1 space/300 square feet Total: 1,119 spaces 1,214 spaces in parking structure 5 parallel parking spaces Total: 1,219 spaces Yes Bicycle Parking Office: 10% of total required vehicle parking Total: 112 spaces 114 interior bike spaces in secure bike room 10 exterior bike spaces Total: 124 bike spaces Yes Open Area/DORA 12% total lot area Total: 40,705 square feet 9,975 square feet on-site 72,254 square feet off-site civic space Total: 82,229 square feet (24.5%) Yes Landscaping See Landscaping section Yes Setbacks None with PUD Front (west): Varies between 8.0’ and 10.9’ Side (south): Varies between 24.7’ to 53.4’ along the private drive Side (north): Varies between 8’ to 19.6’ along the linear civic space Rear (east): 76’ Yes Mechanical Equipment Full screening required Rooftop equipment screened by mechanical penthouse so as not visible from off-site. Yes Sidewalks Required along all streets and building frontages Provided along all streets and building frontages Yes Refuse handling Full screening required Full screening provided by loading dock Yes Transit service None required Served by routes 9, 649, 675 Yes Stormwater Management Water quality treatment and storage/rate control Provided underground and includes other best management practices Yes City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Page 6 Title: Second Reading of 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development Applications Uses The site will be used as a multi-tenant Class A office building and meets the office land use guidance designated by the Comprehensive Plan. The affected property is currently zoned O- Office and is included in the existing Central Park West Planned Unit Development. The rezoning of this property to its own PUD will allow for conditions and requirements that fit the context and character of the individual site and the proposed development. A draft of the ordinance establishing these conditions is attached to this report. Architectural Design The plans submitted are consistent with the overall vision of the West End, former Towers at West End, and Central Park West master plans. The building is oriented along the east/west axis along the northern edge of the property. The building exteriors for 10 West End exceed the City’s minimum requirement of Class I materials, with over 60% used on each façade. The materials used are primarily brick and glass, with architectural precast spandrel panels linking glass elements on every other floor. A vertical glass element is located off-center of the building to allow for an open lobby and ground floor access to the linear civic space. Balconies are included on each level, alternating between the east and west ends of the floor plan. The building features a wood soffit on the underside of the balconies and the buildings hat. Staff asked the applicant to provide a maintenance plan to ensure the appearance of the wood over time. Height The current height limit for the Office district is 20 stories or 240 feet. The building meets this criteria at 11 stories and 173 feet and was preliminarily approved as part of the Central Park West Overall PUD. Lighting The current photometric plan meets the recommended level of 0.5-1 fc at the property line. The lighting features chosen are consistent with the architectural design of the building and are not anticipated to present a nuisance to neighboring properties. The applicant is proposing energy efficient LED lighting similar in style to the lighting in Central Park West. The building will feature architectural uplighting for aesthetic impact and to highlight the wood soffit on the underside of balconies and the building cap. Parking Parking will total 1,219 stalls with 1,214 stalls located in the attached parking structure and 5 parallel parking stalls located along an internal drive on site. An agreement has been approved and designates 110 stalls in the parking structure for use by the AC Hotel by Marriott, Phase III of Central Park West overall PUD. The applicant is also providing 114 bike parking spaces in a secure interior bike room and as well as ten exterior bike parking spaces for visitors. Access Vehicular access to the office tower occurs through two separate entrances to the parking structure. The main entrance is a private drive from Utica Avenue South and the other on Lilac Drive. The private drive becomes a one-way street after the entrance of the parking structure to limit traffic exiting the parking structure onto Lilac Drive. This change was recommended by Golden Valley staff. Pedestrian access to the site is located on Utica Avenue South, through the shared linear park and facing the private drive. Utica Avenue has recently been improved and widened. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Page 7 Title: Second Reading of 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development Applications Loading/Service Areas The site plan shows a fully screened loading dock placed in between the office building and the parking structure. This loading dock will also house organics, trash, and recycling. Landscaping The landscape plan indicates 72 new trees and 256 shrubs. The project does not meet the City’s planting requirements but has provided a variety of alternative landscaping measures in order to meet the intent of the landscaping ordinance. These alternative measures include: a rain garden, outdoor plazas, an outdoor retail patio, rooftop landscaping, public bike racks, and artwork on the parking structure. Designed Outdoor Recreation Area (DORA) The proposed development plans illustrate DORA through the inclusion of a balcony on each level of the building, a partial green roof and amenity space located above the loading dock, and through access to the shared Central Park West linear civic space. The plan exceeds the City’s minimum 12% DORA requirements. Signage A sign plan was not submitted for review. Signs will require permits and must comply with the O- Office District standards. Utilities All small utilities will be placed underground. Utility service structures, such as a generator and transformer, will be screened completely from off-site with materials consistent with the main building facade. Per the development agreement, buildings will provide the necessary infrastructure to take advantage of existing or future fiber-optic service lines in the vicinity of the development. Public Input A joint neighborhood meeting between St. Louis Park and Golden Valley regarding the project was held on May 11, 2016. There was one St. Louis Park resident and one Golden Valley resident in attendance. The residents voiced concerns regarding traffic and the applicant described the Travel Demand Management (TDM) measures that they are taking to reduce congestion. Representatives from iHeartMedia Corporation attended and voiced concerns over the height of the building disrupting radio signal transmission from their office in the West End. The applicant is working with iHeartMedia to accommodate this concern. The City of St. Louis Park Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 20, 2016. There were no attendees and the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the application. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Page 8 Title: Second Reading of 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development Applications ORDINANCE NO. ____-16 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ST. LOUIS PARK CITY CODE RELATING TO ZONING BY CREATING SECTION 36-268-PUD 6 AS A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1601 UTICA AVENUE SOUTH THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK DOES ORDAIN: Findings Sec. 1. The City Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission (Case No. 16-25-S, 16-26-PUD) for amending the Zoning Ordinance to create a new Planned Unit Development (PUD) Zoning District. Sec. 2. The Comprehensive Plan designates this property as Office. Sec. 3. The Zoning Map shall be amended by reclassifying the following described lands from O-Office to PUD 6: Lot 2, Block 1, Central Park West P.U.D. 121, Second Addition Outlot A, Central Park West P.U.D No.121, Second Addition Sec. 4. The St. Louis Park Ordinance Code, Section 36-268 is hereby amended to add the following Planned Unit Development Zoning District: Section 36-268-PUD 6. (a) Development Plan The site shall be developed, used and maintained in conformance with the following Final PUD signed Official Exhibits: 1. C100-C102 – Survey 2. C101 – Proposed Site Plan 3. C200 – Erosion Control Plan 4. C300 – Site Plan 5. C301 – Final Phasing Plan 6. C400 – Grading Plan 7. C500 – Utility Plan 8. E100 – Photometric Plan 9. L100 – Landscape Site Plan 10. L101 – DORA Requirements 11. L200 – Layout Plan 12. L400 – Planting Plan 13. L500 – Planting Detail Sheet 14. A050 – Architectural Site Plan 15. A100 – Floor Plan – Level 1 16. A101 – Floor Plan – Level 2 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Page 9 Title: Second Reading of 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development Applications 17. A102 – Floor Plan – Level 3 & 4 (Typ. Multi) 18. A103 – Floor Plan – Level 5-10 (Typ. Single) 19. A104 – Floor Plan – Level 11 20. A105 – Floor Plan – Level 12 (Penthouse) 21. A120 – Roof Plan 22. A150 – Floor Plan - Loading Dock 23. A300 – Exterior Elevation - South 24. A301 – Exterior Elevation - West 25. A302 – Exterior Elevation - North 26. A303 – Exterior Elevation – East 27. Preliminary Plat 28. Final Plat 29. 10 West End AUAR Memorandum 30. Travel Demand Management Plan 31. Zoning Map Amendment Exhibit 32. Parking Easement for Phase III Hotel The site shall also conform to the following requirements: (1) The property shall be developed with 332,600 square feet of building space. (2) Parking shall be provided on-site. The parking structure located on Lot 2, Block 1, Central Park West P.U.D. 121 Second Addition will provide at least 1,214 parking stalls. One-hundred-ten of these stalls shall be shared with Phase III of Central Park West (PUD-4). (3) The maximum building height shall not exceed 175 feet and eleven stories, excluding mechanical penthouse. (4) The development site shall provide Designated Outdoor Recreation Area (DORA) through access to the outdoor amenity decks located on each floor, and through shared outdoor space on site. (b) Permitted Uses (1) Office. The conditions are as follows: Building heights shall be limited to eleven stories or 173 feet. (2) Retail. The conditions are as follows: a. No single use retail establishment over 20,000 square feet is permitted. The retail facility shall be permitted only as a part of a larger development on a single parcel which contains at least one other permitted principal use or as a part of a mixed use PUD. b. Access shall be to a roadway identified in the comprehensive plan as a collector or arterial or shall be otherwise located so that access can be provided without generating significant traffic on local residential streets. c. All refuse shall meet the requirements of chapter 22 regulating refuse. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Page 10 Title: Second Reading of 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development Applications (3) Restaurants without intoxicating liquor license. The conditions are as follows: a. This use shall be permitted as part of a larger development which contains at least one other principal use or as part of a PUD. b. These uses shall not result in any exterior building modifications, including truck docks or freestanding signage, overnight truck parking or similar features. c. Retail uses shall be integrated with other principal land uses which are within the O district and shall not exceed ten percent of the gross floor area of the building. d. If there is a wine and/or beer license, the following additional conditions shall apply: 1. There shall be no separate bar area within the restaurant. 2. If the conditions in subsections (c)(15)a.--(c)(15)e. of this section are not met, a restaurant with a wine and/or beer license may apply for a major amendment to a Planned Unit Development under section 36-194(d)(4), provided that the parking requirements for a restaurant with intoxicating liquor license are met. (c) Accessory Uses Permitted accessory uses are as follows: (1) Parking lots. (2) Parking structures. Facades that are visible from off-site shall display and integration of building materials, building form, textures, architectural motifs, and building colors with principal building. (3) Public transit stops/shelters. (4) Outdoor seating, public address (PA) systems are prohibited. (5) No outdoor storage allowed. (d) Special Performance Standards (1) All general zoning requirements not specifically addressed in this ordinance shall be met, including but not limited to: outdoor lighting, architectural design, landscaping, parking and screening requirements. (2) All trash, garbage, waste materials, trash containers, and recycling containers shall be kept in the manner required by this Code. City strongly encourages all new developments to have on-site organic recycling, Garbage/recycling rooms should be sized to allow for organics recycling. All trash handling and loading areas shall be screened from view within a waste enclosure. (3) Signage shall be allowed in conformance with the approved redevelopment plan or final PUD site plan and development agreement in accordance with the following conditions: a. Pylon signs are not permitted; City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Page 11 Title: Second Reading of 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development Applications b. Freestanding monument signs shall utilize the same exterior materials as the principal buildings and shall not interfere with pedestrian/bicycle or automobile circulation and visibility; c. Maximum allowable number, sizes and heights of signs shall be regulated by section 36-362, O-Office requirements. (4) Façade. The following façade design guidelines shall be applicable to ground floor north, south, and west side facades. a. For street-facing facades, no more than 10% of total window and door area shall be glass block, mirrored, spandrel, frosted or other opaque glass, finishes or material including window painting and signage. The remaining 90% of window and door area shall be clear or slightly tinted glass, allowing views into and out of the interior. b. Visibility into the space shall be maintained for a minimum depth of three feet. This requirement shall not prohibit the display of merchandise. (5) Awnings. a. Awnings must be constructed of heavy canvas fabric, metal and/or glass. Plastic and vinyl awnings are prohibited. b. Backlit awnings are prohibited. Sec. 5. The contents of Planning Case File 16-25-S and 16-26-PUD are hereby entered into and made part of the public hearing record and the record of decision for this case. Sec. 6. This Ordinance shall take effect fifteen days after its publication. Public Hearing July 20, 2016 First Reading August 15, 2016 Second Reading September 6, 2016 Date of Publication September 16, 2016 Date Ordinance takes effect October 1, 2016 Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council September 6, 2016 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Approved as to Form and Execution: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Soren Mattick, City Attorney City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Page 12 Title: Second Reading of 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development Applications SUMMARY FOR PUBLICATION ORDINANCE NO.____-16 AN ORDINANCE CREATING A NEW PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICT 1601 UTICA AVENUE SOUTH This ordinance states that the Zoning Map shall be amended from O-Office to PUD 6; and the Zoning Ordinance Code, Section-268 will be amended to add Section 36-268-PUD 6. The Planned Unit Development allows for the construction of an 11-story, 335,710 square foot Class A office tower and a 7-level, 1,214 stall parking structure. This ordinance shall take effect 15 days after publication. Adopted by the City Council September 6, 2016 Jake Spano /s/ Mayor A copy of the full text of this ordinance is available for inspection with the City Clerk. Published in St. Louis Park Sailor: September 15, 2016 OFFICES AT WEST END CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN UTICA AVENUE SLILAC DRIVE SGOLDEN VALLEYST. LOUIS PARKCity Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Second Reading of 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development Applications Page 13 R:\Projects\700\200\700-270 West End Office Development\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\SURVEY - West End Office.dwg C100City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Second Reading of 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development ApplicationsPage 14 R:\Projects\700\200\700-270 West End Office Development\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\SURVEY - West End Office.dwg C101City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Second Reading of 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development ApplicationsPage 15 R:\Projects\700\200\700-270 West End Office Development\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\SURVEY - West End Office.dwg C102City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Second Reading of 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development ApplicationsPage 16 STATE H W Y . N O . 1 0 0 UTICA AVENUE S ABCCCLILAC D R I V E S ( E X I S T I N G P R I V A T E R O A D )VAN30,800± SFPROPOSED 11-STORY OFFICE54,880± SFPROPOSED 7-LEVEL RAMP332,530± TOTAL SF373,200± TOTAL SF1,214 TOTAL PARKING STALLSTJR905-586SHEET TITLEDRAWN BYCHECKED BYJOB NO.DATESHEET NO.CREGISTRATIONNO.DATE7/8/20167/11/2016 7:48:46 AMC300R:\Projects\700\200\700-270 West End Office Development\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\SITE PLAN - West End Office.dwg JBOI hereby certify that this plan, specification,or report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer under thelaws of the State of Minnesota.SITE PLAN7002707/8/2016SITE NOTES:LEGEND:2016 RYAN A+E, INC.42340JARED OLSONISSUE RECORDISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION16/20/2016CITY SUBMITTAL27/8/2016SD SET------------------------------------------------------------------------------------PRELIM INARYNOT FORCONSTRUCTION ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------PROJECT NAMELOCATIONRYAN COMPANIES US, INC.50 South Tenth Street, Suite 300Minneapolis, MN 55403-2012612-492-4000 tel612-492-3000 faxPROJECT NAMELOCATIONRYAN A+E, INC.50 South Tenth Street, Suite 300Minneapolis, MN 55403-2012612-492-4000 tel612-492-3000 fax1601 UTICA AVENUE S,ST. LOUIS PARK, MN5541610 WEST ENDWWW.RYANCOMPANIES.COMSD SETCity Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Second Reading of 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development ApplicationsPage 17 STATE HWY. NO. 100WAYZATABOULEVARDUTICA AVENUE SABCCCLILAC DRIVE S (EXISTING PRIVATE ROAD)VAN TJR905-586SHEET TITLEDRAWN BYCHECKED BYJOB NO.DATESHEET NO.CREGISTRATIONNO.DATE7/8/20167/8/2016 5:33:40 PMC301R:\Projects\700\200\700-270 West End Office Development\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\SITE PLAN PHASING PLAN - West End Office.dwg JBOI hereby certify that this plan, specification,or report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer under thelaws of the State of Minnesota.SITE PLAN -FINAL PHASINGPLAN7002707/8/2016SITE NOTES:LEGEND:2016 RYAN A+E, INC.42340JARED OLSONISSUE RECORDISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION16/20/2016CITY SUBMITTAL27/8/2016SD SET------------------------------------------------------------------------------------PRELIM INARYNOT FORCONSTRUCTION ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------PROJECT NAMELOCATIONRYAN COMPANIES US, INC.50 South Tenth Street, Suite 300Minneapolis, MN 55403-2012612-492-4000 tel612-492-3000 faxPROJECT NAMELOCATIONRYAN A+E, INC.50 South Tenth Street, Suite 300Minneapolis, MN 55403-2012612-492-4000 tel612-492-3000 fax1601 UTICA AVENUE S,ST. LOUIS PARK, MN5541610 WEST ENDWWW.RYANCOMPANIES.COMSD SETCity Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Second Reading of 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development ApplicationsPage 18 12630877.31UKNWNSTATE H W Y . N O . 1 0 0 UTICA AVENUE S ABCCCLILAC D R I V E S ( E X I S T I N G P R I V A T E R O A D )VAN30,800± SFPROPOSED 11-STORY OFFICE54,880± SFPROPOSED 7-LEVEL RAMPTJR905-586SHEET TITLEDRAWN BYCHECKED BYJOB NO.DATESHEET NO.CREGISTRATIONNO.DATE7/8/20167/8/2016 5:37:30 PMC400R:\Projects\700\200\700-270 West End Office Development\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\GRADING PLAN - West End Office.dwg JBOGRADING PLAN7002707/8/2016GRADING NOTES:LEGEND:2016 RYAN A+E, INC.42340JARED OLSONI hereby certify that this plan, specification,or report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer under thelaws of the State of Minnesota.ISSUE RECORDISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION16/20/2016CITY SUBMITTAL27/8/2016SD SET------------------------------------------------------------------------------------PRELIM INARYNOT FORCONSTRUCTION ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BUILDING LASTING RELATIONSHIPSBUILDING LASTING RELATIONSHIPSPROJECT NAMELOCATIONRYAN COMPANIES US, INC.50 South Tenth Street, Suite 300Minneapolis, MN 55403-2012612-492-4000 tel612-492-3000 faxPROJECT NAMELOCATIONRYAN A+E, INC.50 South Tenth Street, Suite 300Minneapolis, MN 55403-2012612-492-4000 tel612-492-3000 fax1601 UTICA AVENUE S,ST. LOUIS PARK, MN5541610 WEST ENDWWW.RYANCOMPANIES.COMSD SETCity Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Second Reading of 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development ApplicationsPage 19 12630877.31UKNWNSTATE H W Y . N O . 1 0 0 UTICA AVENUE S ABCCCLILAC D R I V E S ( E X I S T I N G P R I V A T E R O A D )VAN30,800± SFPROPOSED 11-STORY OFFICE54,880± SFPROPOSED 7-LEVEL RAMPTJR905-586SHEET TITLEDRAWN BYCHECKED BYJOB NO.DATESHEET NO.CREGISTRATIONNO.DATE7/8/20167/11/2016 8:19:24 AMC500R:\Projects\700\200\700-270 West End Office Development\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\UTILITY PLAN - West End Office.dwg JBOUTILITY PLAN7002707/8/2016UTILITY NOTES:LEGEND:I hereby certify that this plan, specification,or report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer under thelaws of the State of Minnesota.2016 RYAN A+E, INC.42340JARED OLSONISSUE RECORDISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION16/20/2016CITY SUBMITTAL27/8/2016SD SET------------------------------------------------------------------------------------PRELIM INARYNOT FORCONSTRUCTION ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BUILDING LASTING RELATIONSHIPSBUILDING LASTING RELATIONSHIPSPROJECT NAMELOCATIONRYAN COMPANIES US, INC.50 South Tenth Street, Suite 300Minneapolis, MN 55403-2012612-492-4000 tel612-492-3000 faxPROJECT NAMELOCATIONRYAN A+E, INC.50 South Tenth Street, Suite 300Minneapolis, MN 55403-2012612-492-4000 tel612-492-3000 fax1601 UTICA AVENUE S,ST. LOUIS PARK, MN5541610 WEST ENDWWW.RYANCOMPANIES.COMSD SETCity Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Second Reading of 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development ApplicationsPage 20 E0017/8/2016R:\Projects\700\200\700-270 West End Office Development\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\PHOTOMETRIC PLAN - West End Office.dwg City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Second Reading of 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development ApplicationsPage 21 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Second Reading of 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development Applications Page 22 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Second Reading of 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development Applications Page 23 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Second Reading of 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development Applications Page 24 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Second Reading of 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development Applications Page 25 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Second Reading of 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development Applications Page 26 A B C C C NNNNNNNNNNNNDN UP UP UP A150 1 GENERATOR LILAC DRIVEUTICA AVENUEPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE HIGHWAY 100TRASH ROOM LOADING DOCK EXISTING PARK EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDING BUILDING ENTRY BUILDING ENTRY BUILDING ACCESS BUILDING ACCESS LOADING DOCK ENTRY PARKING RAMP ACCESS PARKING RAMP ACCESS UTILITY ACCESS 16' - 0"35' - 4 1/2"7' - 4"CITY OF ST LOUIS PARKCITY OF GOLDEN VALLEYR RYAN A+E, INC. 50 South Tenth Street, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55403-2012 612-492-4000 tel 612-492-3000 fax PROJECT NAME LOCATION SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY JOB NO.DATE SHEET NO. WWW.RYANCOMPANIES.COM © 2014 RYAN A+E, INC.PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 7.8.2016 SD SET 7/11/2016 8:46:13 AM Author Checker 700270 7.8.2016 A050 10 WEST END ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN 1601 Utica Avenue South St Louis Park, MN 55416 1" = 20'-0"A050 1 SITE PLAN N ISSUE RECORD ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Second Reading of 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development Applications Page 27 DN UP UP GENERAL NOTES A REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR SLAB ON GRADE CONSTRUCTION, CONTROL AND ISOLATION JOINTS. B COORDINATE UNDERGROUND AND UNDER SLAB UTILITIES WITH RELEVANT TRADES PRIOR TO SLAB POUR. COORDINATE ALL SLEEVES THROUGH/UNDER FOOTING AND FOUNDATION WITH STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. C PROVIDE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS OF SIZE, TYPE, AND LOCATION AS REQUIRED BY THE FIRE MARSHAL. D DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF MASONRY OR FACE OF GYP. BD. U.N.O. E SEE SHEET A600 FOR WALL TYPE INFORMATION F SEE SHEET A601 FOR PARTITION TYPE INFORMATION G ALL WALLS TO ROOF DECK TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO ACCOMMODATE DEFLECTION OF ROOF STRUCTURE. H REFER TO STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO STRUCTURAL COMPONENT SIZES, LOCATIONS, CONFIGURATIONS, AND CAPACITIES. J ALL THRESHOLDS TO BE 1/2" HIGH MAX. K PROVIDE MOISTURE RESISTANT GYP BD. ON TOILET ROOM WET WALL AND ADJACENT TO JANITOR SINK. L PROVIDE CONTROL JOINTS IN GYP. BD. AS RECOMMENDED BY MANUFACTURER. M STAIR SUPPLIER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CODE COMPLIANCE AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY FOR ALL MATERIALS FURNISHED. N NEW PARTITIONS TO BE NOTED AND DESCRIBED AS W ALL PARTITION TYPES. O SUBCONTRACTOR TO VERIFY DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS. ANY OMISSIONS, DISCREPANCIES, OR CONFLICTS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE DESIGN-BUILDER IMMEDIATELY. P DIMENSIONS ARE 4'-0" ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR AND FROM FACE OF FINISHED PARTITION. Q DRAWINGS SHOULD NOT BE SCALED - DIMENSIONS GOVERN. LARGE SCALE DRAWINGS GOVERN OVER SMALL SCALE DRAWINGS. R THE TYPICAL DIMENSION FROM THE HINGE SIDE OF A DOOR OPENING IS TO THE FACE OF ADJACENT PERPENDICULAR WALL IS 3" U.N.O. S W HEREVER A PENETRATION OCCURS IN A FIRE-RATED ENCLOSURE SUCH AS WALLS OR SLABS, THE SPACE AROUND THE PENETRATION SHALL NOT EXCEED 1/2", SHALL BE PACKED WITH SOLID MINERAL WOOL (OR EQUAL), AND SHALL BE CLOSED OFF WITH A TIGHT FITTING ESCUTCHEON PLATE (OR EQUAL) ON BOTH SIDES OF THE FIRE-RATED ENCLOSURE TO ENSURE A FULL FIRE-RATING IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODE. T ANY DOOR CLOSER SHALL BE MOUNTED ON THE TENANT SIDE OF ENTRY DOORS. 1 A303 1 A300 1 A301 1 A302 1 A 2 B C D 3 4 6 7 8 1 A401 34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"46' - 6"32' - 0"46' - 6"2170 SF FITNESS 108 1120 SF BIKE ROOM 110 1134 SF LOADING / STAGING 111 307 SF MEN'S LOCKER 105B 307 SF WOMEN'S LOCKER 104B 255 SF MEN'S RESTROOM 105A 255 SF WOMEN'S RESTROOM 104A 711 SF MECH. / BUILDING SERVICES 113 4774 SF OFFICE 115 298 SF UTILITIES 116 3183 SF RETAIL 117 BUILDING DIRECTORY PLAZA ENTRY PARK ENTRY 2374 SF OFFICE 118 4692 SF OFFICE 114 630 SF TRASH / RECYCLING 112 5 3' - 0"22' - 0"9' - 0" 1 A450 3 A450 1 A400 2 A450 30' - 0"1' - 0"1' - 0" 7' - 0"1' - 0"1' - 3 3/4" 1' - 7 1/4" 4' - 2 1/4"8' - 0"11' - 2 1/2"8' - 0"10' - 4"STAIR 1 101 200 SF FIRE COMMAND 106 101102A108110B109B 110C112A112B111B 111A 113110AB6 2 A3 A3 A3 A3A3 G 8 A3 A3 B6 2 A 4 1 A3 1' - 3 1/2"30' - 8 1/2"13' - 9 1/4"4' - 8 1/2" 1' - 0" 9' - 4 3/4"56' - 2 3/4"4' - 8 1/2"34' - 0"1' - 0" 10' - 2 1/2"12' - 0"10' - 4 3/4" 4 3/4"16' - 8 3/16"40' - 10 3/4"10 7/8"34' - 0"9' - 10 5/8" 10 7/8"26' - 9 5/8"7' - 2 3/8"1' - 2"1' - 2" 6' - 10" 3' - 0" 2' - 2"14' - 8"2' - 2" 8' - 6 7/8" 2' - 2"1' - 2"1' - 0"7' - 0"6' - 11 3/4"10' - 0 5/8"14' - 11 5/8" 6 3/4" 5' - 2" 68' - 0"136' - 0" PC-2 1 1' - 10 1/2"A700 3 A701 3 A703 1 885' - 9" 882' - 5"6' - 0"2' - 11" 2' - 6"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"5' - 0"8' - 6" 1' - 6" 3' - 3"25' - 6"3' - 3" 1' - 6" 8' - 6"5' - 0"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"2' - 6" 2' - 11" 2' - 11" 2' - 6"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"2' - 6" 2' - 3"29' - 6"2' - 3" 2' - 6"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"2' - 6" 2' - 11"2' - 11"2' - 11"2' - 11" 2' - 5 1/2"2' - 11"3775 SF LOBBY 100 A151 1 SEE SHEET A150SEE SHEET A1502' - 0"4' - 9"29' - 6"4' - 9" 1' - 0" 2' - 8 1/2" 4' - 10 1/2" 10 3/4" 4' - 0" 4' - 0" 6' - 6" 2' - 0" 5' - 0" 1539 SF CIRCULATION 103 180 SF SERVICE ELEV 107 173 SF STAIR 2 102100D100F 100C100ABUILDING DIRECTORY 5' - 0 3/16"1' - 0"4' - 0" 5 A450 4 A450 2' - 2"2' - 2"2' - 6" A3A3 A3 102B107106 A3A3 116 115114117A118117B103105A 104A 105C 104C 111C4' - 8 1/2"10' - 4 3/4" 109A 253 SF CIRCULATION 109 10' - 6"16' - 0" 4 3/4" 5' - 7 1/4" 7' - 0 3/4" 2' - 11 1/4"BIKE REPAIR STATIONS55" WEATHER MONITOR BIKE PARTS VENDING MACHINE CAPACITY: 114 BIKES13' - 5"10' - 8 1/2"9' - 10 1/2"ALIGNALIGNALIGNALIGN13' - 0 7/16"B6 2 B6 2 B6 2 C2 TYP. PFB 2 A3A3 A3 C2 A 4 1 A 4 1 A3A3 E6 2 E6 2 A3 2"7 5/8" CATWALK EDGES ABOVE SECURITY DESK3' - 0"9' - 9 5/16" ALIGN ALIGN ALIGN ALIGN 4 3/4" 4' - 11" F11 F4 A6 A3 A6 A3A3 A3A3 F4 5' - 6 7/8"7' - 3 1/4"11' - 6 1/4"14' - 6 7/8"5' - 1 1/4"B6 2 8' - 1 1/2" 4 3/4" B6 2 A3B6 2 B6 2 B6 2 5' - 6 3/4" 5' - 6 7/8"11' - 3 7/8"5' - 6 7/8" A3 1' - 0 1/8"10 7/8"15' - 0"3' - 4"2' - 4 3/4"E6 2 E6 2 C2 C2 A6.1 1 A6 E6 2 E6 2 C2 C2 E6 2 E6 2 B6 2 FSG 4 B6 2 E 3 2 E4 2 B6 2 A 4 1 A3 C2 G 8G 8 PC-1A 1 PLAN KEYNOTES 1 6" CONCRETE FILLED EXTERIOR BOLLARD - SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS 2 HOSE BIB 3 CONCRETE STOOP WITH FROST FOOTING - SEE STRUCT. 4 SPRINKLER RISER 5 GAS METER 6 FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION 7 ELECTRICAL PANELS - SEE ELEC. PLANS 8 NOT USED 9 NOT USED 10 ACCESS PANEL - SEE MECH. R RYAN A+E, INC. 50 South Tenth Street, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55403-2012 612-492-4000 tel 612-492-3000 fax PROJECT NAME LOCATION SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY JOB NO.DATE SHEET NO. WWW.RYANCOMPANIES.COM © 2014 RYAN A+E, INC.PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 7.8.2016 SD SET 7/8/2016 1:38:19 PM Author Checker 700270 7.8.2016 A100 10 WEST END FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 1 1601 Utica Avenue South St Louis Park, MN 55416 N 1/8" = 1'-0"A100 1 LEVEL 1 ISSUE RECORD ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Second Reading of 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development Applications Page 28 DN DNUP UP GENERAL NOTES A REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR SLAB ON GRADE CONSTRUCTION, CONTROL AND ISOLATION JOINTS. B COORDINATE UNDERGROUND AND UNDER SLAB UTILITIES WITH RELEVANT TRADES PRIOR TO SLAB POUR. COORDINATE ALL SLEEVES THROUGH/UNDER FOOTING AND FOUNDATION WITH STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. C PROVIDE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS OF SIZE, TYPE, AND LOCATION AS REQUIRED BY THE FIRE MARSHAL. D DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF MASONRY OR FACE OF GYP. BD. U.N.O. E SEE SHEET A600 FOR WALL TYPE INFORMATION F SEE SHEET A601 FOR PARTITION TYPE INFORMATION G ALL WALLS TO ROOF DECK TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO ACCOMMODATE DEFLECTION OF ROOF STRUCTURE. H REFER TO STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO STRUCTURAL COMPONENT SIZES, LOCATIONS, CONFIGURATIONS, AND CAPACITIES. J ALL THRESHOLDS TO BE 1/2" HIGH MAX. K PROVIDE MOISTURE RESISTANT GYP BD. ON TOILET ROOM WET WALL AND ADJACENT TO JANITOR SINK. L PROVIDE CONTROL JOINTS IN GYP. BD. AS RECOMMENDED BY MANUFACTURER. M STAIR SUPPLIER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CODE COMPLIANCE AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY FOR ALL MATERIALS FURNISHED. N NEW PARTITIONS TO BE NOTED AND DESCRIBED AS W ALL PARTITION TYPES. O SUBCONTRACTOR TO VERIFY DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS. ANY OMISSIONS, DISCREPANCIES, OR CONFLICTS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE DESIGN-BUILDER IMMEDIATELY. P DIMENSIONS ARE 4'-0" ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR AND FROM FACE OF FINISHED PARTITION. Q DRAWINGS SHOULD NOT BE SCALED - DIMENSIONS GOVERN. LARGE SCALE DRAWINGS GOVERN OVER SMALL SCALE DRAWINGS. R THE TYPICAL DIMENSION FROM THE HINGE SIDE OF A DOOR OPENING IS TO THE FACE OF ADJACENT PERPENDICULAR WALL IS 3" U.N.O. S W HEREVER A PENETRATION OCCURS IN A FIRE-RATED ENCLOSURE SUCH AS WALLS OR SLABS, THE SPACE AROUND THE PENETRATION SHALL NOT EXCEED 1/2", SHALL BE PACKED WITH SOLID MINERAL WOOL (OR EQUAL), AND SHALL BE CLOSED OFF WITH A TIGHT FITTING ESCUTCHEON PLATE (OR EQUAL) ON BOTH SIDES OF THE FIRE-RATED ENCLOSURE TO ENSURE A FULL FIRE-RATING IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODE. T ANY DOOR CLOSER SHALL BE MOUNTED ON THE TENANT SIDE OF ENTRY DOORS. U PROVIDE ROD AND SHELF AT COAT CLOSETS. 1 A303 1 A300 1 A301 1 A302 1 A 2 B C D 3 4 6 7 8 1 A401 34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"68' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"46' - 6"32' - 0"46' - 6"4130 SF OFFICE 210 1890 SF LARGE CONFERENCE 211 5360 SF OFFICE 214 8320 SF OFFICE 209 360 SF WOMEN'S RESTROOM 177 340 SF MEN'S RESTROOM 205 630 SF MEDIUM CONFERENCE 213 720 SF PRE-FUNCTION SPACE 212 5 1 A400 180 SF SERVICE ELEV 207 GRAND STAIR 200 STAIR 1 201 BOH 208 3330 SF CIRCULATION 203 STAIR 2 202 382345357358318 227 16414' - 9"14' - 11 7/16"15' - 10 3/16"34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"46' - 6"32' - 0"46' - 6"68' - 0"136' - 0"45' - 0"1' - 6"44' - 0"2' - 6"A3A3 A3 A3A3 A3 A3 A3 F11 B6 2 6 A3 A3 38' - 6"8' - 0" 9 5/8" 26' - 7 1/4"4' - 7 1/8" 7' - 0 1/16"39' - 5 15/16"7' - 6 1/8"8' - 3 3/8"8' - 7 1/16"25' - 4 15/16" 8' - 7 1/4"10' - 7 1/4"9' - 0"10' - 2 1/4"8' - 8 1/2"15' - 1 1/4"10' - 9 5/8"7' - 0" 18' - 5 7/8"15' - 6 1/8"10' - 4 3/4"30' - 5 3/8"9 5/8"19' - 8"12' - 4"12' - 0"8' - 0"11' - 7 1/4"4 3/4"4 3/4"5' - 2"9' - 5"22' - 7"5' - 8 1/2"8' - 0" 8 1/2"5 1/2" 1' - 3 3/4" 10 7/8"34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"1' - 0" 1' - 3 3/4"34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"33' - 10 3/8"5' - 7 9/16"A700 4 A701 4 A703 2 OPEN TO BELOW OPEN TO BELOW SEE SHEET A150SEE SHEET A150A151 2 A304 1 5' - 1 1/4" 8' - 5 3/4"5' - 0"7' - 4 13/16"6' - 0"7' - 0"8' - 4 3/4"11' - 0"20' - 4"5' - 2" 5' - 2" 3' - 1" 3' - 0" 3' - 0" 3' - 0" 3' - 1" 40 SF BOH 206 PLAN KEYNOTES 1 6" CONCRETE FILLED EXTERIOR BOLLARD - SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS 2 HOSE BIB 3 CONCRETE STOOP WITH FROST FOOTING - SEE STRUCT. 4 SPRINKLER RISER 5 GAS METER 6 FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION 7 ELECTRICAL PANELS - SEE ELEC. PLANS 8 NOT USED 9 NOT USED 10 ACCESS PANEL - SEE MECH. R RYAN A+E, INC. 50 South Tenth Street, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55403-2012 612-492-4000 tel 612-492-3000 fax PROJECT NAME LOCATION SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY JOB NO.DATE SHEET NO. WWW.RYANCOMPANIES.COM © 2014 RYAN A+E, INC.PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 6.20.2016 CITY SUBMITTAL 6/17/2016 3:10:25 PM Author Checker 700270 6.20.2016 A101 10 WEST END FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 2 St. Louis Park & Golden Valley, MN N 1/8" = 1'-0"A101 1 LEVEL 2 ISSUE RECORD ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Second Reading of 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development Applications Page 29 UP DNUP GENERAL NOTES A REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR SLAB ON GRADE CONSTRUCTION, CONTROL AND ISOLATION JOINTS. B COORDINATE UNDERGROUND AND UNDER SLAB UTILITIES WITH RELEVANT TRADES PRIOR TO SLAB POUR. COORDINATE ALL SLEEVES THROUGH/UNDER FOOTING AND FOUNDATION WITH STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. C PROVIDE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS OF SIZE, TYPE, AND LOCATION AS REQUIRED BY THE FIRE MARSHAL. D DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF MASONRY OR FACE OF GYP. BD. U.N.O. E SEE SHEET A600 FOR WALL TYPE INFORMATION F SEE SHEET A601 FOR PARTITION TYPE INFORMATION G ALL WALLS TO ROOF DECK TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO ACCOMMODATE DEFLECTION OF ROOF STRUCTURE. H REFER TO STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO STRUCTURAL COMPONENT SIZES, LOCATIONS, CONFIGURATIONS, AND CAPACITIES. J ALL THRESHOLDS TO BE 1/2" HIGH MAX. K PROVIDE MOISTURE RESISTANT GYP BD. ON TOILET ROOM WET WALL AND ADJACENT TO JANITOR SINK. L PROVIDE CONTROL JOINTS IN GYP. BD. AS RECOMMENDED BY MANUFACTURER. M STAIR SUPPLIER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CODE COMPLIANCE AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY FOR ALL MATERIALS FURNISHED. N NEW PARTITIONS TO BE NOTED AND DESCRIBED AS W ALL PARTITION TYPES. O SUBCONTRACTOR TO VERIFY DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS. ANY OMISSIONS, DISCREPANCIES, OR CONFLICTS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE DESIGN-BUILDER IMMEDIATELY. P DIMENSIONS ARE 4'-0" ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR AND FROM FACE OF FINISHED PARTITION. Q DRAWINGS SHOULD NOT BE SCALED - DIMENSIONS GOVERN. LARGE SCALE DRAWINGS GOVERN OVER SMALL SCALE DRAWINGS. R THE TYPICAL DIMENSION FROM THE HINGE SIDE OF A DOOR OPENING IS TO THE FACE OF ADJACENT PERPENDICULAR WALL IS 3" U.N.O. S W HEREVER A PENETRATION OCCURS IN A FIRE-RATED ENCLOSURE SUCH AS WALLS OR SLABS, THE SPACE AROUND THE PENETRATION SHALL NOT EXCEED 1/2", SHALL BE PACKED WITH SOLID MINERAL WOOL (OR EQUAL), AND SHALL BE CLOSED OFF WITH A TIGHT FITTING ESCUTCHEON PLATE (OR EQUAL) ON BOTH SIDES OF THE FIRE-RATED ENCLOSURE TO ENSURE A FULL FIRE-RATING IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODE. T ANY DOOR CLOSER SHALL BE MOUNTED ON THE TENANT SIDE OF ENTRY DOORS. U PROVIDE ROD AND SHELF AT COAT CLOSETS. 1 A303 1 A300 1 A301 1 A302 1 A 2 B C D 3 4 6 7 8 1 A401 5 1 A400 CIRCULATION 303 250 SF MENS 305 260 SF WOMENS 304 Room 306 STAIR 1 301 SERVICE ELEV 307 90 SF Room 308 50 SF Room 309 STAIR 2 302 34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"46' - 6"32' - 0"46' - 6"7330 SF OFFICE 310 4780 SF OFFICE 312 12580 SF OFFICE 311 386 308303383312311317 305 302307322385304310 38470' - 3"29' - 6"140' - 0" 2' - 6"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"2' - 6" 2' - 3"29' - 6"2' - 3" 2' - 6"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"2' - 6" 1' - 9"77' - 6"52' - 0"2' - 3"2' - 6"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"13' - 6"1' - 6"3' - 3"25' - 6"3' - 3"46' - 6"2' - 3"52' - 0"25' - 6"12' - 0"60' - 9"2 1 2 1 2 1 40' - 1 1/8"6' - 4 7/8"32' - 0"6' - 0 1/16"40' - 5 15/16"4 3/4"30' - 6"1' - 1 1/4"6' - 9 5/8"26' - 4 7/8"7' - 7 1/8"1' - 0" 6' - 4 7/8"20' - 4"12' - 0 5/8"19' - 2 1/2"9' - 0"18' - 10 3/4"9' - 1 1/4"6' - 0"4 3/4"14' - 4 1/4"2' - 1 3/4"15' - 1 1/4"22' - 7"2' - 8 3/4"6' - 8 1/4"26' - 0"8' - 0" A3A3 A3A3 A3 A3 E6 2 B6 2 C2 A3A3 A3A3 E6 2 E6 2 E6 2 E6 2 E6 2 E6 2 E6 2 E6 2 E6 2 E6 2 E6 2 B6 2 A3 B6 2 B6 2 B6 2 B6 2 B6 2A700 5 A701 5 A703 3 6' - 4 3/4"6' - 0"6' - 0" 5' - 0" 8' - 0"5' - 0"5' - 0"6' - 0"5' - 0"6' - 0" PLAN KEYNOTES 1 6" CONCRETE FILLED EXTERIOR BOLLARD - SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS 2 HOSE BIB 3 CONCRETE STOOP WITH FROST FOOTING - SEE STRUCT. 4 SPRINKLER RISER 5 GAS METER 6 FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION 7 ELECTRICAL PANELS - SEE ELEC. PLANS 8 NOT USED 9 NOT USED 10 ACCESS PANEL - SEE MECH. R RYAN A+E, INC. 50 South Tenth Street, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55403-2012 612-492-4000 tel 612-492-3000 fax PROJECT NAME LOCATION SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY JOB NO.DATE SHEET NO. WWW.RYANCOMPANIES.COM © 2014 RYAN A+E, INC.PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 6.20.2016 CITY SUBMITTAL 6/17/2016 3:10:28 PM Author Checker 700270 6.20.2016 A102 10 WEST END FLOOR PLAN - LEVELS 3 & 4 (TYP. MULTI) St. Louis Park & Golden Valley, MN N 1/8" = 1'-0"A102 1 LEVELS 3 & 4 - MULTI-TENANT FLOOR ISSUE RECORD ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Second Reading of 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development Applications Page 30 DNUP GENERAL NOTES A REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR SLAB ON GRADE CONSTRUCTION, CONTROL AND ISOLATION JOINTS. B COORDINATE UNDERGROUND AND UNDER SLAB UTILITIES WITH RELEVANT TRADES PRIOR TO SLAB POUR. COORDINATE ALL SLEEVES THROUGH/UNDER FOOTING AND FOUNDATION WITH STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. C PROVIDE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS OF SIZE, TYPE, AND LOCATION AS REQUIRED BY THE FIRE MARSHAL. D DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF MASONRY OR FACE OF GYP. BD. U.N.O. E SEE SHEET A600 FOR WALL TYPE INFORMATION F SEE SHEET A601 FOR PARTITION TYPE INFORMATION G ALL WALLS TO ROOF DECK TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO ACCOMMODATE DEFLECTION OF ROOF STRUCTURE. H REFER TO STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO STRUCTURAL COMPONENT SIZES, LOCATIONS, CONFIGURATIONS, AND CAPACITIES. J ALL THRESHOLDS TO BE 1/2" HIGH MAX. K PROVIDE MOISTURE RESISTANT GYP BD. ON TOILET ROOM WET WALL AND ADJACENT TO JANITOR SINK. L PROVIDE CONTROL JOINTS IN GYP. BD. AS RECOMMENDED BY MANUFACTURER. M STAIR SUPPLIER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CODE COMPLIANCE AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY FOR ALL MATERIALS FURNISHED. N NEW PARTITIONS TO BE NOTED AND DESCRIBED AS W ALL PARTITION TYPES. O SUBCONTRACTOR TO VERIFY DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS. ANY OMISSIONS, DISCREPANCIES, OR CONFLICTS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE DESIGN-BUILDER IMMEDIATELY. P DIMENSIONS ARE 4'-0" ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR AND FROM FACE OF FINISHED PARTITION. Q DRAWINGS SHOULD NOT BE SCALED - DIMENSIONS GOVERN. LARGE SCALE DRAWINGS GOVERN OVER SMALL SCALE DRAWINGS. R THE TYPICAL DIMENSION FROM THE HINGE SIDE OF A DOOR OPENING IS TO THE FACE OF ADJACENT PERPENDICULAR WALL IS 3" U.N.O. S W HEREVER A PENETRATION OCCURS IN A FIRE-RATED ENCLOSURE SUCH AS WALLS OR SLABS, THE SPACE AROUND THE PENETRATION SHALL NOT EXCEED 1/2", SHALL BE PACKED WITH SOLID MINERAL WOOL (OR EQUAL), AND SHALL BE CLOSED OFF WITH A TIGHT FITTING ESCUTCHEON PLATE (OR EQUAL) ON BOTH SIDES OF THE FIRE-RATED ENCLOSURE TO ENSURE A FULL FIRE-RATING IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODE. T ANY DOOR CLOSER SHALL BE MOUNTED ON THE TENANT SIDE OF ENTRY DOORS. U PROVIDE ROD AND SHELF AT COAT CLOSETS. 1 A303 1 A300 1 A301 1 A302 1 A 2 B C D 3 4 6 7 8 1 A401 34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"68' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"46' - 6"32' - 0"46' - 6"5 1 A400 180 SF SERVICE ELEV 707 170 SF STAIR 1 701 286168 29' - 6"140' - 6" 12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"4' - 9"29' - 6"4' - 9"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"4' - 3"52' - 0"25' - 6"52' - 0"33' - 9"18' - 3"25' - 6"52' - 0"52' - 0"25' - 6"4' - 9"12' - 0"17' - 0"4' - 6"13' - 9"25' - 6"4' - 9"8' - 8 1/8"4' - 9 7/8"17' - 4 7/8"11' - 7 1/8"32' - 0"46' - 6"32' - 0"19' - 2 1/2"9' - 0"10' - 2 1/4"8' - 8 1/2"15' - 1 1/4"32' - 0"25' - 3 3/4"6' - 8 1/4"2 1 2 1 2 1 B6 2 A4A4 E6 2 E6 2 E6 2 E6 2 E6 2 E6 2 E6 2 A4A4 E6 2 E6 2 B6 2 A703 3 Sim A700 5 Sim A701 5 Sim A151 3 260 SF WOMENS 704 250 SF MENS 705 170 SF BOH 710 170 SF STAIR 2 702 OFFICE 700 100 SF BOH 706 90 SF BOH 708 50 SF BOH 709 PLAN KEYNOTES 1 6" CONCRETE FILLED EXTERIOR BOLLARD - SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS 2 HOSE BIB 3 CONCRETE STOOP WITH FROST FOOTING - SEE STRUCT. 4 SPRINKLER RISER 5 GAS METER 6 FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION 7 ELECTRICAL PANELS - SEE ELEC. PLANS 8 NOT USED 9 NOT USED 10 ACCESS PANEL - SEE MECH. R RYAN A+E, INC. 50 South Tenth Street, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55403-2012 612-492-4000 tel 612-492-3000 fax PROJECT NAME LOCATION SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY JOB NO.DATE SHEET NO. WWW.RYANCOMPANIES.COM © 2014 RYAN A+E, INC.PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 6.20.2016 CITY SUBMITTAL 6/17/2016 3:10:31 PM Author Checker 700270 6.20.2016 A103 10 WEST END FLOOR PLAN - LEVELS 5-10 (TYP. SINGLE) St. Louis Park & Golden Valley, MN N 1/8" = 1'-0"A103 1 LEVELS 5-10 - SINGLE TENANT FLOOR ISSUE RECORD ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Second Reading of 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development Applications Page 31 DN GENERAL NOTES A REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR SLAB ON GRADE CONSTRUCTION, CONTROL AND ISOLATION JOINTS. B COORDINATE UNDERGROUND AND UNDER SLAB UTILITIES WITH RELEVANT TRADES PRIOR TO SLAB POUR. COORDINATE ALL SLEEVES THROUGH/UNDER FOOTING AND FOUNDATION WITH STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. C PROVIDE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS OF SIZE, TYPE, AND LOCATION AS REQUIRED BY THE FIRE MARSHAL. D DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF MASONRY OR FACE OF GYP. BD. U.N.O. E SEE SHEET A600 FOR WALL TYPE INFORMATION F SEE SHEET A601 FOR PARTITION TYPE INFORMATION G ALL WALLS TO ROOF DECK TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO ACCOMMODATE DEFLECTION OF ROOF STRUCTURE. H REFER TO STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO STRUCTURAL COMPONENT SIZES, LOCATIONS, CONFIGURATIONS, AND CAPACITIES. J ALL THRESHOLDS TO BE 1/2" HIGH MAX. K PROVIDE MOISTURE RESISTANT GYP BD. ON TOILET ROOM WET WALL AND ADJACENT TO JANITOR SINK. L PROVIDE CONTROL JOINTS IN GYP. BD. AS RECOMMENDED BY MANUFACTURER. M STAIR SUPPLIER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CODE COMPLIANCE AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY FOR ALL MATERIALS FURNISHED. N NEW PARTITIONS TO BE NOTED AND DESCRIBED AS W ALL PARTITION TYPES. O SUBCONTRACTOR TO VERIFY DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS. ANY OMISSIONS, DISCREPANCIES, OR CONFLICTS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE DESIGN-BUILDER IMMEDIATELY. P DIMENSIONS ARE 4'-0" ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR AND FROM FACE OF FINISHED PARTITION. Q DRAWINGS SHOULD NOT BE SCALED - DIMENSIONS GOVERN. LARGE SCALE DRAWINGS GOVERN OVER SMALL SCALE DRAWINGS. R THE TYPICAL DIMENSION FROM THE HINGE SIDE OF A DOOR OPENING IS TO THE FACE OF ADJACENT PERPENDICULAR WALL IS 3" U.N.O. S W HEREVER A PENETRATION OCCURS IN A FIRE-RATED ENCLOSURE SUCH AS WALLS OR SLABS, THE SPACE AROUND THE PENETRATION SHALL NOT EXCEED 1/2", SHALL BE PACKED WITH SOLID MINERAL WOOL (OR EQUAL), AND SHALL BE CLOSED OFF WITH A TIGHT FITTING ESCUTCHEON PLATE (OR EQUAL) ON BOTH SIDES OF THE FIRE-RATED ENCLOSURE TO ENSURE A FULL FIRE-RATING IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODE. T ANY DOOR CLOSER SHALL BE MOUNTED ON THE TENANT SIDE OF ENTRY DOORS. U PROVIDE ROD AND SHELF AT COAT CLOSETS. 1 A303 1 A300 1 A301 1 A302 1 A 2 B C D 3 4 6 7 8 1 A401 5 34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"46' - 6"32' - 0"46' - 6"1 A400 170 SF STAIR 1 1101 170 SF STAIR 2 1102354 2773' - 0"99' - 0"3' - 0"31' - 0"3' - 0"31' - 0"3' - 0"16' - 5 1/4"3' - 0"43' - 9"1' - 3"2' - 6"27' - 0"2' - 6"1' - 3"43' - 9"1' - 6"1' - 6"3' - 0"17' - 6"87' - 0"17' - 6"3' - 0"46' - 6"32' - 0"46' - 6"32' - 0"39' - 9 1/2"29' - 2 1/2"17' - 10 3/4"15' - 1 1/4"32' - 0"B6 2 A700 6 A701 6 A703 4 A151 3 Sim A3043 A051 2 100 SF BOH 1106 260 SF WOMENS 1104 250 SF MENS 1105 23560 SF OFFICE 1100 170 SF SERVICE ELEV 1107 170 SF BOH 1110 50 SF BOH 1109 90 SF BOH 1108 PLAN KEYNOTES 1 6" CONCRETE FILLED EXTERIOR BOLLARD - SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS 2 HOSE BIB 3 CONCRETE STOOP WITH FROST FOOTING - SEE STRUCT. 4 SPRINKLER RISER 5 GAS METER 6 FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION 7 ELECTRICAL PANELS - SEE ELEC. PLANS 8 NOT USED 9 NOT USED 10 ACCESS PANEL - SEE MECH. R RYAN A+E, INC. 50 South Tenth Street, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55403-2012 612-492-4000 tel 612-492-3000 fax PROJECT NAME LOCATION SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY JOB NO.DATE SHEET NO. WWW.RYANCOMPANIES.COM © 2014 RYAN A+E, INC.PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 6.20.2016 CITY SUBMITTAL 6/17/2016 3:10:34 PM Author Checker 700270 6.20.2016 A104 10 WEST END FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 11 St. Louis Park & Golden Valley, MN N 1/8" = 1'-0"A104 1 LEVEL 11 ISSUE RECORD ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Second Reading of 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development Applications Page 32 GENERAL NOTES A REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR SLAB ON GRADE CONSTRUCTION, CONTROL AND ISOLATION JOINTS. B COORDINATE UNDERGROUND AND UNDER SLAB UTILITIES WITH RELEVANT TRADES PRIOR TO SLAB POUR. COORDINATE ALL SLEEVES THROUGH/UNDER FOOTING AND FOUNDATION WITH STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. C PROVIDE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS OF SIZE, TYPE, AND LOCATION AS REQUIRED BY THE FIRE MARSHAL. D DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF MASONRY OR FACE OF GYP. BD. U.N.O. E SEE SHEET A600 FOR WALL TYPE INFORMATION F SEE SHEET A601 FOR PARTITION TYPE INFORMATION G ALL WALLS TO ROOF DECK TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO ACCOMMODATE DEFLECTION OF ROOF STRUCTURE. H REFER TO STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO STRUCTURAL COMPONENT SIZES, LOCATIONS, CONFIGURATIONS, AND CAPACITIES. J ALL THRESHOLDS TO BE 1/2" HIGH MAX. K PROVIDE MOISTURE RESISTANT GYP BD. ON TOILET ROOM WET WALL AND ADJACENT TO JANITOR SINK. L PROVIDE CONTROL JOINTS IN GYP. BD. AS RECOMMENDED BY MANUFACTURER. M STAIR SUPPLIER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CODE COMPLIANCE AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY FOR ALL MATERIALS FURNISHED. N NEW PARTITIONS TO BE NOTED AND DESCRIBED AS W ALL PARTITION TYPES. O SUBCONTRACTOR TO VERIFY DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS. ANY OMISSIONS, DISCREPANCIES, OR CONFLICTS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE DESIGN-BUILDER IMMEDIATELY. P DIMENSIONS ARE 4'-0" ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR AND FROM FACE OF FINISHED PARTITION. Q DRAWINGS SHOULD NOT BE SCALED - DIMENSIONS GOVERN. LARGE SCALE DRAWINGS GOVERN OVER SMALL SCALE DRAWINGS. R THE TYPICAL DIMENSION FROM THE HINGE SIDE OF A DOOR OPENING IS TO THE FACE OF ADJACENT PERPENDICULAR WALL IS 3" U.N.O. S W HEREVER A PENETRATION OCCURS IN A FIRE-RATED ENCLOSURE SUCH AS WALLS OR SLABS, THE SPACE AROUND THE PENETRATION SHALL NOT EXCEED 1/2", SHALL BE PACKED WITH SOLID MINERAL WOOL (OR EQUAL), AND SHALL BE CLOSED OFF WITH A TIGHT FITTING ESCUTCHEON PLATE (OR EQUAL) ON BOTH SIDES OF THE FIRE-RATED ENCLOSURE TO ENSURE A FULL FIRE-RATING IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODE. T ANY DOOR CLOSER SHALL BE MOUNTED ON THE TENANT SIDE OF ENTRY DOORS. U PROVIDE ROD AND SHELF AT COAT CLOSETS. 1 A 2 B C D 3 4 6 7 85 6' - 0"46' - 6"32' - 0"46' - 6"6' - 0"6' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"6' - 0" 1 A400 1080 SF BOILER 1200 170 SF STAIR 2 1202 143 A701 7 A3043 A051 2 PLAN KEYNOTES 1 6" CONCRETE FILLED EXTERIOR BOLLARD - SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS 2 HOSE BIB 3 CONCRETE STOOP WITH FROST FOOTING - SEE STRUCT. 4 SPRINKLER RISER 5 GAS METER 6 FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION 7 ELECTRICAL PANELS - SEE ELEC. PLANS 8 NOT USED 9 NOT USED 10 ACCESS PANEL - SEE MECH. R RYAN A+E, INC. 50 South Tenth Street, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55403-2012 612-492-4000 tel 612-492-3000 fax PROJECT NAME LOCATION SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY JOB NO.DATE SHEET NO. WWW.RYANCOMPANIES.COM © 2014 RYAN A+E, INC.PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 6.20.2016 CITY SUBMITTAL 6/17/2016 3:10:36 PM Author Checker 700270 6.20.2016 A105 10 WEST END FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 12 (PENTHOUSE) St. Louis Park & Golden Valley, MN N 1/8" = 1'-0"A105 1 LEVEL 12 - PENTHOUSE ISSUE RECORD ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Second Reading of 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development Applications Page 33 R R R RRR R DN DN 1 A303 1 A300 1 A301 1 A302 1 A 2 B C D 3 4 6 7 8 1 A401 5 1 A400 1 A701 2 A701 2 A700 1 A700 1 A702 2 A702 A3043 A304 1 A051 2 R RYAN A+E, INC. 50 South Tenth Street, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55403-2012 612-492-4000 tel 612-492-3000 fax PROJECT NAME LOCATION SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY JOB NO.DATE SHEET NO. WWW.RYANCOMPANIES.COM © 2014 RYAN A+E, INC.PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 6.20.2016 CITY SUBMITTAL 6/17/2016 3:10:42 PM Author Checker 700270 6.20.2016 A120 10 WEST END ROOF PLAN St. Louis Park & Golden Valley, MN 1/8" = 1'-0"A120 1 ROOF N ISSUE RECORD ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Second Reading of 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development Applications Page 34 DN 1 A303 A B C D 8 1 A400 21' - 0 1/2" 23' - 10 1/2"13' - 10 3/8"310 SF GENERATOR 541 FULL LOUVERED W ALL 3' - 0" 20' - 0" 10' - 3"15' - 0"11' - 6" A304 2 A B C D 8 2 X201 1 A400 46' - 6"32' - 0"46' - 6"78' - 6"AA BB CC DD 8 8 A304 2 GENERAL NOTES A REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR SLAB ON GRADE CONSTRUCTION, CONTROL AND ISOLATION JOINTS. B COORDINATE UNDERGROUND AND UNDER SLAB UTILITIES WITH RELEVANT TRADES PRIOR TO SLAB POUR. COORDINATE ALL SLEEVES THROUGH/UNDER FOOTING AND FOUNDATION WITH STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. C PROVIDE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS OF SIZE, TYPE, AND LOCATION AS REQUIRED BY THE FIRE MARSHAL. D DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF MASONRY OR FACE OF GYP. BD. U.N.O. E SEE SHEET A600 FOR WALL TYPE INFORMATION F SEE SHEET A601 FOR PARTITION TYPE INFORMATION G ALL WALLS TO ROOF DECK TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO ACCOMMODATE DEFLECTION OF ROOF STRUCTURE. H REFER TO STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO STRUCTURAL COMPONENT SIZES, LOCATIONS, CONFIGURATIONS, AND CAPACITIES. J ALL THRESHOLDS TO BE 1/2" HIGH MAX. K PROVIDE MOISTURE RESISTANT GYP BD. ON TOILET ROOM WET WALL AND ADJACENT TO JANITOR SINK. L PROVIDE CONTROL JOINTS IN GYP. BD. AS RECOMMENDED BY MANUFACTURER. M STAIR SUPPLIER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CODE COMPLIANCE AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY FOR ALL MATERIALS FURNISHED. N NEW PARTITIONS TO BE NOTED AND DESCRIBED AS W ALL PARTITION TYPES. O SUBCONTRACTOR TO VERIFY DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS. ANY OMISSIONS, DISCREPANCIES, OR CONFLICTS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE DESIGN-BUILDER IMMEDIATELY. P DIMENSIONS ARE 4'-0" ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR AND FROM FACE OF FINISHED PARTITION. Q DRAWINGS SHOULD NOT BE SCALED - DIMENSIONS GOVERN. LARGE SCALE DRAWINGS GOVERN OVER SMALL SCALE DRAWINGS. R THE TYPICAL DIMENSION FROM THE HINGE SIDE OF A DOOR OPENING IS TO THE FACE OF ADJACENT PERPENDICULAR WALL IS 3" U.N.O. S W HEREVER A PENETRATION OCCURS IN A FIRE-RATED ENCLOSURE SUCH AS WALLS OR SLABS, THE SPACE AROUND THE PENETRATION SHALL NOT EXCEED 1/2", SHALL BE PACKED WITH SOLID MINERAL WOOL (OR EQUAL), AND SHALL BE CLOSED OFF WITH A TIGHT FITTING ESCUTCHEON PLATE (OR EQUAL) ON BOTH SIDES OF THE FIRE-RATED ENCLOSURE TO ENSURE A FULL FIRE-RATING IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODE. T ANY DOOR CLOSER SHALL BE MOUNTED ON THE TENANT SIDE OF ENTRY DOORS. U PROVIDE ROD AND SHELF AT COAT CLOSETS. R RYAN A+E, INC. 50 South Tenth Street, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55403-2012 612-492-4000 tel 612-492-3000 fax PROJECT NAME LOCATION SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY JOB NO.DATE SHEET NO. WWW.RYANCOMPANIES.COM © 2014 RYAN A+E, INC.PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 6.20.2016 CITY SUBMITTAL 6/17/2016 3:10:46 PM Author Checker 700270 6.20.2016 A150 10 WEST END FLOOR PLAN - LOADING DOCK St. Louis Park & Golden Valley, MN 1/8" = 1'-0"A150 1 LOADING DOCK - LEVEL 1 PLAN 1/8" = 1'-0"A150 2 LOADING DOCK - SKYWAY PLAN N ISSUE RECORD ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Second Reading of 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development Applications Page 35 LEVEL 1 885' - 9" LEVEL 2 900' - 9" 1 LEVEL 3 915' - 9" LEVEL 4 929' - 9" LEVEL 5 943' - 9" LEVEL 6 957' - 9" LEVEL 7 971' - 9" LEVEL 8 985' - 9" LEVEL 9 999' - 9" LEVEL 10 1013' - 9" LEVEL 11 1027' - 9" MECH PENTHOUSE 1043' - 9" 2 3 4 6 7 8 1 A401 5 APC-1S MP-5 GL-21T MP-5 MP-5 MP-5 MP-5MP-5 MP-5 APC-1S GL-21 GL-21 MP-5 MP-5 FB-1 MP-5 FB-1 LOADING DOCK 882' - 5" W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 W2 W1W3 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W21 W21 W21 W21 W21 W21 W21 W21 W22W23W23 W23 W23 W23 W25 MP-5 MP-5 GL-21T W OOD SOFFIT W OOD SOFFIT EXTERIOR MATERIALS % GLASS 50.00%= BRICK 30.75%= PREFINISHED METAL 13.11%= ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST 5.39%= STONE 0.75%= R RYAN A+E, INC. 50 South Tenth Street, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55403-2012 612-492-4000 tel 612-492-3000 fax PROJECT NAME LOCATION SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY JOB NO.DATE SHEET NO. WWW.RYANCOMPANIES.COM © 2014 RYAN A+E, INC.PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 7.8.2016 SD SET 7/8/2016 1:38:52 PM Author Checker 700270 7.8.2016 A300 10 WEST END EXTERIOR ELEVATION - SOUTH 1601 Utica Avenue South St Louis Park, MN 55416 1/8" = 1'-0"A300 1 SOUTH ELEVATION ISSUE RECORD ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Second Reading of 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development Applications Page 36 LEVEL 1 885' - 9" LEVEL 2 900' - 9" A LEVEL 3 915' - 9" LEVEL 4 929' - 9" LEVEL 5 943' - 9" LEVEL 6 957' - 9" LEVEL 7 971' - 9" LEVEL 8 985' - 9" LEVEL 9 999' - 9" LEVEL 10 1013' - 9" LEVEL 11 1027' - 9" MECH PENTHOUSE 1043' - 9" BCD 1 A400 LOADING DOCK 882' - 5" W1 W1 W4 W5A W4 W1 W1 W15 W16 W16 W16 W20 W18 W18 W18 W18 W18 W18 W18 W18 W18 W18 W18 W18 W18 W18 W18 W18 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W29 W28W28 W15 W15 W15 W5B FB-1 MP-5MP-5 MP-5 MP-5 APC-1S MP-5MP-5 FB-1 STN-12 W OOD SOFFIT W OOD SOFFIT W OOD SOFFIT W OOD SOFFIT GL-21 GL-42 GL-21 EXTERIOR MATERIALS % GLASS 50.00%= BRICK 30.75%= PREFINISHED METAL 13.11%= ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST 5.39%= STONE 0.75%= R RYAN A+E, INC. 50 South Tenth Street, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55403-2012 612-492-4000 tel 612-492-3000 fax PROJECT NAME LOCATION SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY JOB NO.DATE SHEET NO. WWW.RYANCOMPANIES.COM © 2014 RYAN A+E, INC.PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 7.8.2016 SD SET 7/8/2016 1:38:58 PM Author Checker 700270 7.8.2016 A301 10 WEST END EXTERIOR ELEVATION - WEST 1601 Utica Avenue South St Louis Park, MN 55416 1/8" = 1'-0"A301 1 W EST ELEVATION MATERIAL ID MATERIAL ID DESCRIPTION UNIFORMAT CODE SPEC SECTION ACT-1 ACT-1_Acoustic Ceiling Tile - (24x24, 5/8", tegular edge, 15/16 grid)C3030.231 095123 AIR AIR - Air Space APC-1 APC-1 - Architectural Precast Concrete Wall Panel @ Tower APC-1S APC-1S - Architectural Precast Concrete Wall Panel @ Tower(SPANDREL) CMU-1 CMU-1_CMU - Normal (or medium) weight units C1020.120 042000 CONC-1 CONC-1_Concrete, Core/Foundation Walls 033000 CONC-2 CONC-2_Normal Weight Concrete Slab, Floors 033000 FB-1 FB-1_Face Brick - (3-5/8" wide x 2-5/16" high x 7-5/8" long)1 74213 GL-21 GL-21_Glass, Insulated - Low-E, clear unit 088100 GL-21T GL-21T_Glass, Insulated - Low-E, clear, tempered 088100 GL-42 GL-42_Glass, Spandrel - Tinted, insulated unit with ceramic frit 088100 GYP BD-1 GYP BD-1_Gypsum Board - 5/8" fire-rated type "X" gypsum board C1010.870 092900 GYP BD-21 GYP BD-21_Gypsum Board - 1" shaft liner C1010.480 092900 INSUL-2 INSUL-2_Insulation, Extruded Polystyrene - Wall insulation B2010.860 072100 INSUL-4 INSUL-4_Insulation, Extruded Polystyrene - High density horizontal rigid insulation (40 PSI)B3010.240 072100 INSUL-21 INSUL-21_Insulation, Fiberglass/Mineral Wool - Interior, Foil-faced fiberglass batt insulation with integral vapor barrier C1010.305 072100 LVR-1 LVR-1_Louver - Prefinished aluminum B2011.170 089100 MET STUD-1 MET STUD-1_Metal Stud Framing, Interior - Non-load bearing, 20 ga, size as indicated C1010.880 092216 MP-1 MP-1_Metal Panels - Composite aluminum panel with return (4mm, wet sealed)B2010.730 074243 MP-5 MP-5_Metal Panels - Formed solid metal panels (1/8" thick)B2010.765 074213 MTL DK-1 Metal Deck 053100 PLAM-1 PLAM-1_(manufacturer, series number, name)E2010.120 064100/123530 SC-2 SC-2_Sealed Concrete - Accent Color STL STUD-1 STL STUD-1_Steel Stud Framing, Exterior - Structural steel studs, 16 ga. Galvanized B2011.100 054100 STN-12 STN-12_Stone - (Granite)C3010.355 044200/049010 WIN AFS-1 WIN AFS-2_Aluminum Framing Systems - Exterior storefront - Clear Wall (2 1/2" x 5")B2020.140 084113 WLAM-1 WLAM-1_Wood Laminate - (manufacturer, series number, name)C3020.480 064116 ISSUE RECORD ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Second Reading of 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development Applications Page 37 LEVEL 1 885' - 9" LEVEL 2 900' - 9" 1 LEVEL 3 915' - 9" LEVEL 4 929' - 9" LEVEL 5 943' - 9" LEVEL 6 957' - 9" LEVEL 7 971' - 9" LEVEL 8 985' - 9" LEVEL 9 999' - 9" LEVEL 10 1013' - 9" LEVEL 11 1027' - 9" MECH PENTHOUSE 1043' - 9" 234678 1 A401 5 LOADING DOCK 882' - 5" W7 W2 W1 W1 W6 W1 W1 W1 W3 W8 W8 W8 W8 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W21 W21 W21 W21 W21 W21 W21 W21 W22 W23 W23W23W23W23W26 W OOD SOFFIT MP-5 MP-5 FB-1 MP-1 STN-12 GL-21T MP-5 MP-5 GL-21T MP-5MP-5 MP-5 MP-5 APC-1S FB-1 GL-21T FB-1 MP-5 MP-5 GL-21 APC-1S GL-21T MP-5 LVR-1 MP-5 EXTERIOR MATERIALS % GLASS 50.00%= BRICK 30.75%= PREFINISHED METAL 13.11%= ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST 5.39%= STONE 0.75%= R RYAN A+E, INC. 50 South Tenth Street, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55403-2012 612-492-4000 tel 612-492-3000 fax PROJECT NAME LOCATION SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY JOB NO.DATE SHEET NO. WWW.RYANCOMPANIES.COM © 2014 RYAN A+E, INC.PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 7.8.2016 SD SET 7/8/2016 1:39:05 PM Author Checker 700270 7.8.2016 A302 10 WEST END EXTERIOR ELEVATION - NORTH 1601 Utica Avenue South St Louis Park, MN 55416 1/8" = 1'-0"A302 1 NORTH ELEVATION ISSUE RECORD ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Second Reading of 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development Applications Page 38 LEVEL 1 885' - 9" LEVEL 2 900' - 9" A LEVEL 3 915' - 9" LEVEL 4 929' - 9" LEVEL 5 943' - 9" LEVEL 6 957' - 9" LEVEL 7 971' - 9" LEVEL 8 985' - 9" LEVEL 9 999' - 9" LEVEL 10 1013' - 9" LEVEL 11 1027' - 9" MECH PENTHOUSE 1043' - 9" B C D 1 A400 MP-5 MP-5 GL-21 MP-5MP-5 GL-21 APC-1S MP-5 GL-21 LOADING DOCK 882' - 5" W11 W10 W9 W9 W17 W17 W18 W15 W17 W17 W18 W17W17W18 W17W17W18 W17 W17 W18 W17 W17 W18 W17W17W18 W17W17W18 W17 W17 W18 W17 W17 W18 W17W17W18 W17W17W18 W17 W17 W18 W17 W17 W18 W17W17W18 W17W17W18W19 W24 W27W26 W26 W24 W15 W16 W15 W16 W15 W16 FB-1 STN-12 GL-21 APC-1S MP-5 FB-1 STN-12 APC-1S GL-21 MP-5MP-5 GL-21 MP-5 MP-5 W OOD SOFFIT EXTERIOR MATERIALS % GLASS 50.00%= BRICK 30.75%= PREFINISHED METAL 13.11%= ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST 5.39%= STONE 0.75%= R RYAN A+E, INC. 50 South Tenth Street, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55403-2012 612-492-4000 tel 612-492-3000 fax PROJECT NAME LOCATION SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY JOB NO.DATE SHEET NO. WWW.RYANCOMPANIES.COM © 2014 RYAN A+E, INC.PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 7.8.2016 SD SET 7/8/2016 1:39:10 PM Author Checker 700270 7.8.2016 A303 10 WEST END EXTERIOR ELEVATION - EAST 1601 Utica Avenue South St Louis Park, MN 55416 1/8" = 1'-0"A303 1 EAST ELEVATION MATERIAL ID MATERIAL ID DESCRIPTION UNIFORMAT CODE SPEC SECTION ACT-1 ACT-1_Acoustic Ceiling Tile - (24x24, 5/8", tegular edge, 15/16 grid)C3030.231 095123 AIR AIR - Air Space APC-1 APC-1 - Architectural Precast Concrete Wall Panel @ Tower APC-1S APC-1S - Architectural Precast Concrete Wall Panel @ Tower(SPANDREL) CMU-1 CMU-1_CMU - Normal (or medium) weight units C1020.120 042000 CONC-1 CONC-1_Concrete, Core/Foundation Walls 033000 CONC-2 CONC-2_Normal Weight Concrete Slab, Floors 033000 FB-1 FB-1_Face Brick - (3-5/8" wide x 2-5/16" high x 7-5/8" long)1 74213 GL-21 GL-21_Glass, Insulated - Low-E, clear unit 088100 GL-21T GL-21T_Glass, Insulated - Low-E, clear, tempered 088100 GL-42 GL-42_Glass, Spandrel - Tinted, insulated unit with ceramic frit 088100 GYP BD-1 GYP BD-1_Gypsum Board - 5/8" fire-rated type "X" gypsum board C1010.870 092900 GYP BD-21 GYP BD-21_Gypsum Board - 1" shaft liner C1010.480 092900 INSUL-2 INSUL-2_Insulation, Extruded Polystyrene - Wall insulation B2010.860 072100 INSUL-4 INSUL-4_Insulation, Extruded Polystyrene - High density horizontal rigid insulation (40 PSI)B3010.240 072100 INSUL-21 INSUL-21_Insulation, Fiberglass/Mineral Wool - Interior, Foil-faced fiberglass batt insulation with integral vapor barrier C1010.305 072100 LVR-1 LVR-1_Louver - Prefinished aluminum B2011.170 089100 MET STUD-1 MET STUD-1_Metal Stud Framing, Interior - Non-load bearing, 20 ga, size as indicated C1010.880 092216 MP-1 MP-1_Metal Panels - Composite aluminum panel with return (4mm, wet sealed)B2010.730 074243 MP-5 MP-5_Metal Panels - Formed solid metal panels (1/8" thick)B2010.765 074213 MTL DK-1 Metal Deck 053100 PLAM-1 PLAM-1_(manufacturer, series number, name)E2010.120 064100/123530 SC-2 SC-2_Sealed Concrete - Accent Color STL STUD-1 STL STUD-1_Steel Stud Framing, Exterior - Structural steel studs, 16 ga. Galvanized B2011.100 054100 STN-12 STN-12_Stone - (Granite)C3010.355 044200/049010 WIN AFS-1 WIN AFS-2_Aluminum Framing Systems - Exterior storefront - Clear Wall (2 1/2" x 5")B2020.140 084113 WLAM-1 WLAM-1_Wood Laminate - (manufacturer, series number, name)C3020.480 064116 ISSUE RECORD ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Second Reading of 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development Applications Page 39 Phone (320) 253-9495 3701 12th Street North, Suite 206 Fax (320) 253-8737 St. Cloud, MN 56303 Toll Free (800) 270-9495 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Second Reading of 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development Applications Page 40 R:\Projects\700\200\700-270 West End Office Development\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\FINAL PLAT - West End Office.dwg City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Second Reading of 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development ApplicationsPage 41 kimley-horn.com 2550 University Avenue West, Suite 238N, St. Paul, MN 55114 651-645-4197 MEMORANDUM To: Sean Walther, City of St. Louis Park Nicole Mardell, City of St. Louis Park From: Jessica Laabs, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Date: July 5, 2016 Subject: Ten West Update Purpose of Memo This memo summarizes the results of sanitary sewer, water use, and traffic analyses for development proposals as part of the West End Development at Highway 100/I-394. Phases I and II of the overall development have been implemented, and current proposals include a Phase III hotel development and a Phase IV office tower. In addition, the city has had recent changes in water infrastructure capacity and its guidelines for determining peak water usage. Results of the analyses were compared to the thresholds established in the 2007 Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) and 2013 AUAR Update to evaluate if the proposed development is in conformance with the AUAR and would not incur additional impacts or require additional mitigation measures. Assumptions The pending proposed developments include: A six-story, limited service hotel with 126 rooms and 68 seats in the hotel bar/breakfast area An 11-story office building with a total of 335,710 gross square feet (GSF) of space The changes in water capacity infrastructure and guidelines include: Loss of one water well included in previous AUAR documentation and GAC improvements at other wells, resulting in a reduction in total firm system capacity from 13.32 million gallons per day (MGD) to 12.24 MGD Shift in city policy to base peak water usage calculations on a five-year average instead of a 10-year average to better reflect actual conditions, resulting in a peak usage of 9.83 MGD instead of 11.88 MGD The analyses were done for two scenarios, called Phase 1 Office and Full Office. The Phase 1 Office Scenario includes the following: 335,710 SF of proposed office space Proposed 126-room hotel and 68 seat hotel bar/breakfast area 853 planned apartment units City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Second Reading of 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development Applications Page 42 Page 2 kimley-horn.com 2550 University Avenue West, Suite 238N, St. Paul, MN 55114 651-645-4197 143,316 SF of existing retail 3,566 seats of existing full service restaurant 375 seats of existing casual restaurant 55,288 SF of existing grocery Existing 2,643 seat movie theater Demolition of 360 seats of full service restaurant (for the Chili’s and Olive Garden) The Full Office Scenario has one difference from the Phase 1 Office Scenario – it includes 706,706 SF of office based on the Revised Scenario 1A analyzed in October 2014. The other development assumptions remained the same. Sanitary Sewer Analysis Sanitary sewer use is not anticipated to be a limiting factor to development. The baseline condition has been adjusted to reflect removal of the Novartis/Nestle facility and the addition of recent planned redevelopment for that site. The baseline does not incorporate the already constructed portions of the West End Development. All development at the West End, existing and planned, is captured within the analysis below. Sanitary use under both the Phase 1 Office and Full Office Scenarios falls beneath the thresholds identified in the AUAR and within the available capacity of the current MCES interceptor (7.4 MGD), as shown in Table 1. Table 1: Net Sanitary Peak Flow Phase 1 Office (MGD) Full Office (MGD) Existing Average Daily Flow1 2.6 2.6 Average Daily Flow Increase – Already Constructed 0.169 0.169 Average Daily Flow Increase – Planned 0.279 0.322 Average Daily Flow Decrease 0.506 0.506 Net Average Daily Flow Adjustment -0.058 -0.015 Total Average Daily Flow (Existing + Net Flow Adjustment) 2.542 2.585 Peak Hourly Flow (2.7 Peak Factor) 6.865 6.979 Peak Hourly flow (2.37 Peak Factor) 6.026 6.126 1 The same Existing Average Daily Flow number has been used since the original AUAR in 2006; it has not been updated by the City. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Second Reading of 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development Applications Page 43 Page 3 kimley-horn.com 2550 University Avenue West, Suite 238N, St. Paul, MN 55114 651-645-4197 Water Use Analysis Water capacity is not anticipated to be a limiting factor to development. With the changes in water capacity infrastructure and guidelines, baseline information has been updated. This City of St. Louis Park updated baseline water use numbers in winter 2015, and this updated baseline includes the already constructed portions of the West End Development. Under the Phase 1 Office Scenario and Full Office Scenario, 86.78 and 87.76 percent of the total system would be utilized, respectively, which is under the city’s preferred 90 percent threshold (see Table 2). Table 2: Water Use Summary Phase 1 Office Full Office Total Firm System Capacity (MGD) 12.24 12.24 City Firm Peak Usage (MGD) 9.83 9.83 Capacity Available (MGD) 2.41 2.41 Proposed Project Usage (MGD) 0.792 0.912 Total City Usage (MGD) 10.622 10.742 Capacity Available (Post-Construction) (MGD) 1.618 1.498 Percent of Total System Utilized 86.78 87.76 Traffic Analysis With the Phase 1 Office Scenario, peak hour trips are within the AUAR thresholds, but under the Full Office Scenario the AUAR thresholds are exceeded in the AM peak hour (outbound movement)2 by 20 trips (see Tables 3 and 4). Table 3: Estimated Phase 1 Office Scenario Traffic Compared to AUAR Thresholds AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour In Out In Out Estimated Trips 629 500 956 1,102 AUAR Trip Generation Limit 1,320 528 1,167 1,883 Table 4: Estimated Full Office Scenario Traffic Compared to AUAR Thresholds AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour In Out In Out Estimated Trips 984 548 1,024 1,435 AUAR Trip Generation Limit 1,320 528 1,167 1,883 2 Vehicles exiting the site City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Second Reading of 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development Applications Page 44 Page 4 kimley-horn.com 2550 University Avenue West, Suite 238N, St. Paul, MN 55114 651-645-4197 Mitigation measures identified in the AUAR were designed to accommodate the heaviest traffic period, which is the PM peak outbound. The traffic mitigation that has already been implemented for the West End Development accommodates the PM peak. As illustrated in Tables 3 and 4, the AM peak outbound movement is much lower than the PM peak. Therefore, it is unlikely that this exceedance in the AM peak hour will present a capacity issue or require additional mitigation. The mitigation measures implemented in previous phases of development already provide the capacity needed. Traffic is not anticipated to be a limiting factor to the proposed development. A more detailed summary of traffic is provided in Tables 5 and 6. Table 5: Phase 1 Office Scenario Traffic Summary3 Land Use Size Daily Trips AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour In Out In Out Office 335,710 SF 2,536 357 49 68 334 Retail (Two Restaurants Removed) 346,674 SF 14,863 218 139 624 676 Apartments 853 units 5,672 85 341 331 178 Hotel 126 rooms 1,029 39 27 39 37 Trip Generation Subtotal 24,101 699 556 1,062 1,225 Multi-Use Reduction (-10%) -2,410 -70 -56 -106 -123 TOTAL 21,691 629 500 956 1,102 AUAR Trip Generation Limits 1,320 528 1,167 1,883 Table 6: Full Office Scenario Traffic Summary3 Land Use Size Daily Trips AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour In Out In Out Office 706,706 SF 5,339 751 102 144 703 Retail (Two Restaurants Removed) 346,674 SF 14,863 218 139 624 676 Apartments 853 units 5,672 85 341 331 178 Hotel 126 rooms 1,029 39 27 39 37 Trip Generation Subtotal 26,904 1,093 609 1,138 1,594 Multi-Use Reduction (-10%) -2,690 -109 -61 -114 -159 TOTAL 24,214 984 548 1,024 1,435 AUAR Trip Generation Limits 1,320 528 1,167 1,883 3 Trip generation calculations as documented in the 2007 West End AUAR were based on ITE Trip Generation, 7th Edition (2003). Current trip generation calculations are based on the most recent version, ITE Trip Generation, 9th Edition (2012). City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Second Reading of 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development Applications Page 45 Page 5 kimley-horn.com 2550 University Avenue West, Suite 238N, St. Paul, MN 55114 651-645-4197 Trip generation rates for retail uses are generalized for purposes of this analysis and to remain consistent with methodology employed throughout various AUAR scenarios and development reviews. However, the diversity of actual retail uses may result in differing trip rates per use. For instance, a grocery store has a much higher daily trip rate than a restaurant. Depending on specific access points and flows of traffic, this may create delay at certain intersections. While the daily trip rate used for this analysis attempts to average out the uses, traffic monitoring or a more detailed traffic study is recommended following construction of the first office building. Summary SANITARY SEWER Sanitary sewer usage generated by the Phase 1 Office and Full Office Scenarios can be accommodated within the limits established in the original AUAR. No additional mitigation is needed. WATER USE Water use is anticipated to be under the AUAR thresholds and the City’s preferred 90 percent total system usage for both the Phase 1 Office and Full Office Scenarios. No additional mitigation is needed. TRAFFIC Traffic generated by the Phase 1 Office Scenario is beneath the limits established in the AUAR, but the AM peak hour outbound movement exceeds the AUAR threshold by 20 trips for the Full Office Scenario. No additional mitigation measures or adjustments are anticipated at this time because the AM peak is accommodated in the capacity of the transportation system, which was designed to accommodate the higher PM peak volumes. Following construction of the first office building, traffic monitoring or a more detailed traffic study is recommended. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Second Reading of 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development Applications Page 46 TRAVEL DEMAND MANAGEMENT PLAN 10 West End Redevelopment Central Park West St. Louis Park, MN Golden Valley, MN Prepared for: Ryan Companies and Excelsior Group Prepared by: August 2016 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Second Reading of 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development Applications Page 47 INTRODUCTION This document serves as the Travel Demand Management (TDM) Plan for the 10 West End Site within the West End Redevelopment located in the southwest quadrant of I-394 and TH 100. As expressed in this document, The Excelsior Group is committed to applying this TDM Plan to the proposed office buildings that will be Phase 4 of the overall project. The cities of St. Louis Park and Golden Valley have established an overlay zoning district and a joint task force to address congestion mitigation strategies. The Task Force reviews Travel Demand Management (TDM) Plans for development in the established I-394 overlay zoning district. The 10 West End site lies within Zone A of the overlay district (City of St. Louis Park Code, Article IV, Sections 36-321 through 36-330). PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed development site is located east of Utica Avenue and is known as Central Park West. It is 13.48 acres in size, and the eastern 6 acres of the site are in the City of Golden Valley. Central Park West, LLC owns the north half and is currently constructing two 6 -story multi-family residential buildings and a 6-story limited service hotel. The Excelsior Group has acquired the south 7.30 +/- acres of Central Park West, which is Phase 4 and 5 of the overall development. This site is mostly vacant land with some surfac e parking lots. Phase 4 (1st phase of office) of the development will be the 11-story office building proposed in this PUD application. Phase 5 (2nd phase of office) will include a second office tower with an expansion to the Phase 4 parking ramp in the future. There have been several planning and infrastructure studies for the development. This proposed project, “10 West End” is very consistent with the previous planning efforts. The office building and parking ramp are slightly smaller than the development p lans and therefore are within the utility demands and traffic study assumptions. 10 West End will provide enough office space to house at least 1,500 workers. This addition to the workforce will add to the already vibrant population of the West End neig hborhood. Limited ground floor retail has been planned to open up to the building lobby as well as the adjacent park, providing active ground floor use that will benefit the building tenants, neighbors, and the general public. Bike and pedestrian activity will be encouraged with extensive landscaping, outdoor patios and bike parking both inside and out. 10 West End is a next generation office development, threading a creative workplace into a vibrant community through thoughtful architecture and site design. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND ALTERNATIVE TRANSIT OPPORTUNITIES Pedestrian and Bicycle The Central Park West development Site currently contains some sidewalk infrastructure along the south side of Wayzata Boulevard and the west side of Utica Avenue. The land on the proposed development is currently vacant and contains informal gravel lots off of unofficial curb cuts, old bituminous parking lots for the razed office buildings, and other vacant land. Utica Avenue and Wayzata City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Second Reading of 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development Applications Page 48 Boulevard currently contain no dedicated bicycle infrastructure. However, the site is located a short distance from the Cedar Lake Trail, a bicycle and pedestrian pathway that runs from downtown Minneapolis to Chanhassen and other southwestern suburban communities. The Cedar Lake Trail carries a significant amount of commuter and recreational bicyclists. The Phase 1 and 2 (DLC residential components) area of the West End Development contains various pedestrian and bicycle amenities. Sidewalks were constructed along both sides of West 16th Street and West End Boulevard, as well as adjoining sidewalks to the grocer tenant and the main passageway from West End Boulevard to Park Place Boulevard. Some sidewalks are separated from the street by pervious green space, and others contain various urban design elements like potters, benches, street lighting, waste receptacles, and artistic bollards. Crosswalks are designated by various brick and stone material that differs from the bituminous roadway. Sidewalk space is lacking on Duke Drive east of the main shopping street. Although there is no designated bike lane infrastructure on the roadways, bike racks are located in front of the grocery tenant and near other retail tenants throughout the development. Bike racks and shower facilities are available at the Moneygram building and the 1600 Towers south of the development for tenants who bike to work. Transit The area is currently served by several bus routes operated by Metro Transit. The routes that serve the area are listed below: Route 9: The route 9 bus serves the site along Park Place Boulevard and Wayzata Boulevard, and also has limited service along Highway 100. This local bus service connects to Cedar Lake Road and travels west to County Road 73. It also provides service into Golden Valley to the north and east of the TMP area, and moves into downtown Minneapolis. It continues through downtown and terminates in south Minneapolis at the 46th Street Blue Line LRT Station. Service is offered seven days a week all year. Buses on this route run from approximately 5:00 AM to 1:00 AM during the week. The route contains 15 to 20 minute headways during rush hour, 30 minute headways midday and evenings, and 30 to 60 minute headways on the weekend. Route 604: The route 604 bus runs west from the Park Place/I-394 Park & Ride lot near the Xenia-Park Place interchange down Wayzata Boulevard to the Louisiana Avenue Transit Center. It then continues south on Louisiana Avenue through St. Louis Park to Excelsior Boulevard, where it moves to and terminates at the Excelsior & Grand shopping district. Service is offered Monday through Friday during rush hour and midday periods, and runs from 7:30 AM to 4:30 PM. The route operates approximately once per hour during the service time. Route 649: The route 649 bus loops along Wayzata Boulevard, Park Place Boulevard, Cedar Lake Road and Louisiana Avenue and provides limited-stop service along I-394 into downtown Minneapolis. Service is offered Monday through Friday during rush hour periods. It operates from approximately 6:15 AM to 8:30 AM, and from 4:00 PM to 6:30PM. The route operates every 30 minutes during the service time. To encourage residents and visitors to utilize transit, expansion of existing routes – such as offering the 649 route every day during the week – should occur to serve the site. Adding new City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Second Reading of 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development Applications Page 49 routes that run directly from the West End into downtown Minneapolis would also help facilitate higher transit ridership to and from the development. Surrounding Amenities The Central Park West development Site is across the street from The Shops at West End, which contain various types of restaurants, a movie theater, a Cub Foods grocery store, and other retail outlets. The site is also within walking distance to several other stores and restaurants across Park Place Boulevard, as well as an Olive Garden restaurant at the corner of Wayzata Boulevard and Utica Avenue. In addition, the existing Moneygram building has a fitness center facility complete with showers and locker rooms that is available to employees in the Moneygram and 1600 Tower buildings. The site is also near newly finished and currently under construction apartment buildings north of 16th Street, as well as a Hilton-based Homewood Suites hotel. Also nearby is the DLC Residential development, which will consist of apartments and a hotel. IMPLEMENTATION OF REQUIRED ROAD IMPROVEMENTS A number of roadway improvements were required by the AUAR and traffic study completed for the Central Park West development. The approved project site plan resulted in a refinement of the improvements needed and these are outlined in the developer’s agreement between the City of St. Louis Park, the City of Golden Valley, and DLC Residential. The majority of the required improvements will be constructed between 2015 and 2020. As a result of these improvements being implemented, the intersections in and around the project are expected to operate at acceptable (LOS D or better) levels of service with the redevelopment. Planned Road Improvements Utica Avenue: Reconstruct existing section of Utica Avenue between Wayzata Boulevard and the Moneygram building entrance. Build four total vehicular lanes with a center grassy median separating northbound and southbound traffic. Construct a privately owned but publically accessible linear park past 16th Street that will assist pedestrians and bicyclists to access the various buildings. These road and park improvements have been designed by, and will be constructed by DLC Residential. Planned Trail and Sidewalk Improvements In addition to road improvements a number of sidewalks will be added for pedestrian and bicycle mobility. The developer has agreed to: Construct improvements to the sidewalk on the south side of Wayzata Boulevard. Construct the linear park and fund all urban design elements within its grounds, including decorative lighting, benches, trash receptacles, and general open space that will be accessible to the public. GOAL AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES The overall goal of this plan is to reduce potential traffic congestion that will come with the proposed development. This will occur by maintaining or improving acceptable levels of service on the roadways within and adjacent to the project site, minimizing the projected number of trips through adjacent City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Second Reading of 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development Applications Page 50 intersections during the PM peak hour, and continuously encouraging alternative transportation use within each component in the development. The general road improvements mixed with pedestrian amenities, bicycle infrastructure, and better transit service will all assist in achieving the goal. PROPOSED TMP STRATEGIES The Excelsior Group in coordination with building managers will pursue the following objectives and strategies to achieve its Traffic Management Plan. Objectives and Strategies – Overall Development TDM Friendly Design Mixed Use Development: A hotel and residential component have been proposed for the subjected site in phases 1-3, and the proposed office space will be constructed in Phases 4 and 5. The hotel and residential uses will help overall traffic flow because the two uses have traditionally different traffic flow peak times during the day. The Shops at West End will also encourage residents and hotel guests alike to stay nearby for shopping, entertainment, and grocery needs. This will reduce the number of vehicular trips that leave the site in the PM peak hour. Commuters to the office buildings in the future will counter traffic flows from residents, thus decreasing the likelihood of concentrated roadway congestion. Residential Component: In the I-394 Overlay Zoning District language for both St. Louis Park and Golden Valley, it is encouraged to develop residential uses within the corridor to reduce PM peak traffic volumes in one direction. This development includes two separate 6-story apartment buildings containing 363 dwelling units. Residents in these units will likely either be reverse commuting from areas other than the West End vicinity in the afternoon, or will be working in the nearby office buildings, thus helping reduce PM traffic congestion. Shared Parking: A mixed-use development of this type provides opportunities for shared parking among different uses, reducing the overall number of parking spaces needed on-site. The fully built out pedestrian infrastructure within the site will help site users access shops, hotels, and residences by walking instead of driving. A parking structure in the east side of the property will help alleviate office parking concerns and spillover, and will improve direct traffic flow into the development. Designated Hotel Guest Parking: Hotel employees will be enticed to park in areas that won’t create parking lot bottlenecks, and will be encouraged to seek alternative commuting methods like biking, walking, or taking transit. This will allow the hotel to hold sufficient parking spaces for its guests, thus reducing internal vehicular trips (guests driving around to find a more convenient parking space). The hotel lot will also have specific signage that will discourage non- guests from parking in that area. Underground Residential Parking: The development plan calls for underground parking for residents in the apartment buildings, thus reducing parking conflicts in surrounding hotel and office parking areas. Delivery Truck Reductions: Deliveries via truck will be minimized due to the general lack of need for shipments to the residential buildings. Delivery Trucks will be discouraged to deliver between 10 pm and 9 am to minimize the disturbance to neighboring residential properties and to prevent conflict with the AM peak hour with office workers entering the parking structure. Trucks needed for any use on the site will enter at the curb cut near the corner of Wayzata City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Second Reading of 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development Applications Page 51 Boulevard and Lilac Lane. Garbage collection will be carefully scheduled during the day to minimize impacts on residents and public. Pedestrian Access: Bike and pedestrian activity will be encouraged with extensive landscaping, outdoor patios and bike parking both inside and out. 10 West End is a next generation office development, threading a creative workplace into a vibrant community through thoughtful architecture and site design. An emphasis will be placed on pedestrian connections within the development. This will promote a walkable, bike-friendly development that will activate the street fronts. Bicycle Access: Wayfinding signs will direct bicycle riders to ride south to the Cedar Lake Trail. Bicycles will also be allowed within the “woonerf” and linear park space. The office building will have facilities dedicated to bike commuters. Bicycle parking inside the building will provide space for about 114 bikes. There will also be shower facilities for 0.5% of the FTE (Full Time Equivalent) employees. For bike commuters there are several off site bike ways including the North Cedar Lake Regional Trail that runs from West End to Downtown Minneapolis. Once on site there are clear bike lanes that pass through the park and connect to the proposed bike racks. 18 total racks are provided split between the front and back of the building. Objectives and Strategies – Phase IV Office Participate with Regional TDM Organizations to Provide Information on Transportation Alternatives The property manager will serve as the office Commuter Benefits Coordinator (CBC) position to coordinate with Metro Transit and officials from trail network entities. Display transit and trail maps in locations within the office building. Support and Promote Bicycling and Walking as Alternatives Build and maintain pedestrian-friendly space within and alongside development site. Prioritize pedestrian movements over automobile movements at intersections by designating crosswalks with different paving material. Actively display updated biking information, such as commuting tips and trail maps, in the lobbies of each building. Include indoor and outdoor bike storage facilities to employees. Add a fitness center and showers into one of the office building. These amenities will be accessible to employees who wish to walk or bike to work. After the construction of the bikeway along Wayzata Boulevard to the east of the development, a bikeshare station for NiceRide bicycles will be considered at the development. Support and Promote Transit as an Alternative Encourage Metro Transit to increase frequency of existing service or add new direct service into downtown Minneapolis from turnaround area. Managers of each office suite will be encouraged by property management to facilitate the sale of bus passes to employees, and will provide detailed transit information to office visitors. The CBC (property manager) will encourage office tenants to use alternative commuting methods, and will sell bus passes to employees in addition to the managers of each office suite. Support and Promote Carpooling and Vanpooling Promote carpool and vanpool by providing dedicated preferred parking stalls for carpools. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Second Reading of 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development Applications Page 52 Parking for rideshare services such as ZipCar or HourCar will be provided. Rideshare parking spaces may be either added or designated. Monitoring Once offices are 75% occupied, send survey to employees to gather interest and supply information about alternative transportation. After 6 months of occupancy, property manager to survey tenant on transportation usage. Property manager will evaluate effectiveness of strategies and modify the plan accordingly. TDM IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Developer(s) will be responsible to implement this plan upon completion of the Central Park West development. These obligations will run with the land in the event that portions of the project are sold to third parties. The steps to plan implementation are outlined below: 1) Property manager will be trained to serve as transportation coordinators and to follow plan implementation. These persons will coordinate with each other and with the Commuter Benefits Coordinator (CBC) in the future office buildings. 2) Once the office buildings are 75% occupied, the property manager will conduct a commuter survey to estimate participation in alternative modes of transportation. 3) The property manager will work with Metro Transit to inform all tenants regarding all alternative transportation options available to them for commuting. 4) The City of St. Louis Park will be completing an updated traffic study of the area with the implemented road improvements following the completion of Phase 4. The City of Golden Valley has not committed to completing this study at this time. CBC staff will coordinate with both municipalities post construction of 10 West End to determine if traffic is operating at acceptable levels. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Second Reading of 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development Applications Page 53 TRAVEL MANAGEMENT MEASURE STATUS TARGET DATE TDM Friendly Design – Overall Design Mixed Use Development – establish uses with separate peak traffic flows 2020 Residential Component – Build residential use in corridor to increase reverse commuting 2018 Designated Hotel Guest Parking – ease of access 2018 Underground Apartment Parking – ease of access for residents 2018 Delivery Truck Restrictions – restrict delivery times 2018 Shared Parking – reduce overall parking spaces on-site 2018 Pedestrian Access – establish good sidewalk connections 2018 Bicycle Access – establish good biking infrastructure 2018 TDM Organization Collaboration Create CBC position for office buildings 2020 Display non-vehicular transportation information 2018 Incentivize tenants to commute using alternative transportation 2018 Promote Walking & Biking Build and maintain good pedestrian spaces 2018 Create designated biking infrastructure 2018 Include indoor and outdoor bicycle storage facilities 2018 Actively update walking & biking information within building lobbies 2018 Add a fitness center with shower facilities to the office building 2018 Consider installation of NiceRide bikeshare station 2020 Promote Transit Use Encourage Metro Transit to extend service or add new service to area 2018 Have office managers sell bus passes to employees. 2018 Promote Car/Vanpooling City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Second Reading of 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development Applications Page 54 TRAVEL MANAGEMENT MEASURE STATUS TARGET DATE Have office managers match employees for potential carpool arrangements 2018 Distribute carpool & vanpool information to employees 2018 Look into viability for rideshare service implementation 2018 Look into improving rideshare parking spaces 2018 Monitoring Send commuting survey to tenants once office is 75% occupied and office is open 2018 Evaluate effectiveness of strategies and modify plan in coordination with concierges, CBC, and officials from the Cities of St. Louis Park and Golden Valley 2020 Property manager to survey tenant on transportation usage 2020 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Second Reading of 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development Applications Page 55 Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: September 6, 2016 Consent Agenda Item: 4g EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Second Reading Arlington Row West Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to approve Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance amending Section 36-268-PUD 3 relating to Arlington Row West Planned Unit Development, and to approve the summary ordinance for publication. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council support the requested amendments resulting from Plat changes and allow solar panel installation above a carport for Arlington Row West. SUMMARY: Approval would correct the legal description used in Ordinance 2481-15 and approve changes to setbacks, density, lot area, designed outdoor recreation area, floor and ground floor area ratios resulting from a lot line amendment to the plat. In addition, approval would allow for the incorporation of a 40kw solar powered electrical installation that will be constructed above carport structures located in the western portion of the parking lot. Arlington Row West is located at 7905 Wayzata Blvd. The Council approved the First Reading of the Ordinance August 15, 2016. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: None VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a leader in environmental stewardship. We will increase environmental consciousness and responsibility in all areas of city business. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance Ordinance Summary Official Exhibits Prepared by: Julie Grove, Economic Development Specialist Reviewed by: Sean Walther, Planning and Zoning Supervisor Michele Schnitker, Deputy Community Development Director Approved by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4g) Page 2 Title: Second Reading Arlington Row West Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment ORDINANCE NO. ____-16 ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 36-268-PUD 3 RELATING TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7905 WAYZATA BLVD THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK DOES ORDAIN: Findings Sec. 1. The City Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission (Case No. 15-29-CP, 15-30-S and 15-31-PUD). Sec. 2. The Comprehensive Plan designates this property as RM – Medium Density Residential. Sec. 3. The City Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission (Case No. 16-33-PUD) for amending Ordinance 2481-15 to revise the legal description and modify the plat north boundary line. Sec. 4. The St. Louis Park Ordinance Code, Sections 36-268-PUD 3 are hereby amended by adding underscored language. Section breaks are represented by ***. *** (a) Development Plan *** 26. Solar Canopy Schematics 27. Solar Study *** (c) Accessory Uses *** (6) Solar panels as regulated by this Chapter. a. Rooftop or building mounted systems 1. Roof or building mounted solar systems shall not exceed the maximum allowed height in the PUD zoning district. b. Ground or accessory structure mounted solar systems 1. The height of a ground or accessory structure mounted solar system, measured when oriented at maximum design tilt, shall not exceed 15 feet. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4g) Page 3 Title: Second Reading Arlington Row West Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment 2. Ground or accessory structure mounted solar systems shall have a minimum setback of 7 feet from the south property line, 46 feet from the west property line and shall be subject to the principal building setbacks along the north and east property lines. Sec. 5. The contents of Planning Case File 16-31-S and 16-33-PUD are hereby entered into and made part of the public hearing record and the record of decision for this case. Sec. 6. This Ordinance shall take effect fifteen days after its publication. Public Hearing August 3, 2016 First Reading August 15, 2016 Second Reading September 6, 2016 Date of Publication September 15, 2016 Date Ordinance takes effect September 30, 2016 Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council September 6, 2016 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4g) Page 4 Title: Second Reading Arlington Row West Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment SUMMARY FOR PUBLICATION ORDINANCE NO.____-16 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICT 7905 WAYZATA BOULEVARD This ordinance states that Section 36-268-PUD 3 shall be amended to revise the legal description and modify the plat north boundary line and allow solar panel installations above carports in the parking lot for property located at 7905 Wayzata Boulevard. This ordinance shall take effect 15 days after publication. Adopted by the City Council September 6, 2016 Jake Spano /s/ Mayor A copy of the full text of this ordinance is available for inspection with the City Clerk. Published in St. Louis Park Sailor: September 15, 2016 1A 1/A8.2 A - 1 - 01 1A 1/A8.2 (TYPE B) A - 1 - 03 -A - 1 - 102EXISING TREE LINE 107' - 2"TRUENORTHRETAINING WALL REF CIVIL FOR LAYOUT CIVIL 920.7 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 A9 A10 A12A13A14A15A16A17A18A19A20A21A22A23A24A25A26A27A28 A45A42A43A40A41A38A39A36A37A34A35A32A33 14' - 7"15' - 0"24' - 3 3/4"29' - 1 1/4" 917.27TC 919.4 A31 TYPE A UNIT - REF BUILDING PLANS FOR INTERIOR LAYOUT **ONE "TYPE A" IS REQUIRED & ONE "TYPE A" IS PROVIDED BLDG 2 BLDG 1 TRASH / RECYCLE 2 AS1.2 920.8 A1 TEXAS AVENUE SOUTH WAYZATA BOULEVARD24' - 0" A44 A52 A51 A50 A49 A48 A47 A46 A29A30 10' - 0"5' - 0"5' - 0"CURB 10' SET BACK 5' - 0"CURB TO BUILDING29' - 3"6' - 0"6' - 0" SIDEWALK8' - 6"18' - 0"BIKE STORAGE BIKE RACKS TREES / LANDSCAPING SHOWN FOR REF SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS TO LAYOUT AND SPECIES TREES / LANDSCAPING SHOWN FOR REF SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS TO LAYOUT AND SPECIES RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY GARDER PLOTS AND LANDSCAPING - SEE LANDSCAPE DESIGN MASONRY WALL SCREEN / ACCESS GATE ACCESS GATE VISITORVISITORVISITOR VISITORVISITORAS1.4 1 AS1.4 6 FOR ALL RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS CONTAINING SLAB ON GRADE DWELLING UNITS - PROVIDE A RADON MITIGATION UNDERSLAB SYSTEM SYSTEM TO BE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED TO COMPLY WITH SECTION 1303.2400 OF MSBC 2105 FOR ALL RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS CONTAINING SLABON GRADE DWELLING UNITS - PROVIDE A RADONMITIGATION UNDERSLAB SYSTEMSYSTEM TO BE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED TO COMPLYWITH SECTION 1303.2400 OF MSBC 21051A (ALT) 1B/A8.2 A - 1 - 11 1A 1A/A8.2 A - 1 - 12-ACCESSIBLEA - 1 - 102-A - 1 - 10BIKE STORAGE COMMUNITY ROOM ACCESSIBLE ROUTE PROVIDE MAX SLOPE OF 1/20 & MAX CROSS SLOPE OF 1.5% AS1.5 A1 2 130 PANEL SOLAR ARRAY CANOPY 8' - 0"elness swenson graham architects 500 washington avenue south m inneapolis m innesota 55415 p. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 5 0 8 f. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 3 8 2 w w w . e s g a r c h . c o m I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or r e p ort was prepared by m e or under m y direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of M innesota Signature Typed or Printed Nam e License # D ate PROJECT NUM BER D RAW N BY CHECKED BY O RIGINAL ISSUE: R EVISIO NS KEY PLAN N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T IO N **D R A F T ** H UD PRO JECT NUM BER 6/29/2016 2:14:34 PMA S1.2 A RCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN - SITE A - "TEXAS" 2 15515 M E E SG 0 1/29/16 A RLINGTON ROW A RLINGTON ROW S T. LO UIS PARK, M N 5 /27/2016 - 100% C D's A 0 92-35807 PARKING COUNT - TEXAS SITE Texas Site A ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL 3 C2 COMPACT 8'0" X 18'0"2 S1 STANDARD 8'6" X 18'0"26 S2 STANDARD 8'9" X 18'0"21 52 TOTAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS - 34 BUILDING FOOTPRINT(S) - 5,578 (X2) BUILDING GROSS SF - 15,831 (X2) SITE AREA - 1.397 ACRE DENSITY - 24.3 UNITS / ACREPLANNORTH 0 1 68 3 2 1/16" = 1'-0"AS1.2 2 TEXAS SITE ELEVATION SEE CIVIL SITE PLAN FOR UTILITY AND EXISTING LOCATIONS AND COORDINATION WITH BUILDING FOOTPRINT INDOOR BIKE PARKING IS CENTRALIZED IN THE NORTH BUILDING AND IS TO BE ACCESSIBLE TO ALL RESIDENCE 1/16" = 1'-0"AS1.2 1 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN UNIT MATRIX - SITE A - TEXAS Count Unit Type Name SF Unit (Paint to Paint) "HUD Net Rentable" Gross Unit Rentable (Per Unit) Total Gross Unit Rentable (=Rentable * Count) Bed rooms Total Beds 1 LEVEL 1 1 1A 2 BED 786 SF 863 SF 863 SF 2 2 1 1A (ALT) 1 BED 558 SF 631 SF 631 SF 1 1 2 1B 2 BED (2 STORY) 956 SF 1,088 SF 2,176 SF 2 4 2 1C 1 BED 492 SF 535 SF 1,070 SF 1 2 2 1C 1 BED 492 SF 535 SF 1,070 SF 1 2 8 5,810 SF 11 LEVEL 2 3 2A 2 BED (2 STORY) 1,000 SF 1,123 SF 3,369 SF 2 6 2 2B 2 BED (2 STORY) 1,029 SF 1,168 SF 2,336 SF 2 4 4 2C 1 BED (2 STORY) 672 SF 753 SF 3,012 SF 1 4 9 8,717 SF 14 17 14,527 SF 25 2 LEVEL 1 2 1A 2 BED 786 SF 863 SF 1,726 SF 2 4 2 1B 2 BED (2 STORY) 956 SF 1,088 SF 2,176 SF 2 4 2 1C 1 BED 492 SF 535 SF 1,070 SF 1 2 2 1C 1 BED 492 SF 535 SF 1,070 SF 1 2 8 6,042 SF 12 LEVEL 2 3 2A 2 BED (2 STORY) 1,000 SF 1,123 SF 3,369 SF 2 6 2 2B 2 BED (2 STORY) 1,029 SF 1,168 SF 2,336 SF 2 4 4 2C 1 BED (2 STORY) 672 SF 753 SF 3,012 SF 1 4 9 8,717 SF 14 17 14,759 SF 26 34 29,286 SF 51 ONE ACCESSSIBLE UNIT IS REQUIRED AND ONE IS PROVIDED SEE CODE SHEET FOR COMPLETE CODE REQUIREMENTS N o .Description Date A 1/2 9/2016 - 100% DD D OCUM ENTS SITE A 1/29/2016 C 4/27/2016 - 85% CD / HUD Subm ittal - Response 4/27/2016 1 5/27/2016 - HUD Review Response Item s 5/27/2016 2 7/6/2016 - City PUD Am endm ent 7/6/2016 FOR CONSTRUCTION / BUILDING PERM IT REVIEW COM M ENTS TBD City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016(Item No. 4g) Title: Second Reading Arlington Row West Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment Page 5 Sheet No.: Project No.: Sheet Title: Quality Control: Checked By: Project Lead:Drawn By: Review Date: Professional Signature: by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing or for completion of this project by others without written approval shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files are instruments of the Consultant professional services CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project CADD Qualification: Professional Services: Project Name: Owner/Developer:W:\2015\15186\CADD DATA\SURVEYPlotted: 06 /30 / 2016 10:53 AMVicinity Map: Revisions: Landscape Architecture Environmental Planning Civil Engineering Land Surveying 2016 7200 Hemlock Lane - Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 Telephone: (763) 424-5505 www.LoucksAssociates.com St. Louis Park, Minnesota 22375 Murray Street Excelsior, Minnesota 55331 Sheet 1 of 1 (Texas Avenue South Site) --MJA RLL Paul J. McGinley - PLS 16099 License No.Date I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Vicinity Map: DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED (Parcel 8 described in Schedule A of the herein referenced Title Commitment) Parcel 8: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (NW1/4SW1/4) of Section 5, Township 117 North, Range 21 West, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the north line of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 5, distant 12 rods east of the northwest corner thereof; thence south for 20 rods; thence deflect to the left at an angle of 90 degrees 00 minutes and run easterly to the public road (known as Texas Avenue) running south from Wayzata Boulevard (as located and established prior to November 15, 1961); thence north along said public road to the south line of said Wayzata Boulevard; thence west to the point of beginning. Abstract property PROPOSED DESCRIPTION (June 28, 2016) That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 5, Township 117 North, Range 21 West, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence South 89 degrees 57 minutes 27 seconds East (assumed bearing), along the north line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, a distance of 198.00 feet; thence South 2 degrees 29 minutes 51 seconds West a distance of 4.15 feet to the intersection with a line drawn 50.00 feet southerly of and parallel with the following described ³/LQH $´ said point of intersection being the point of beginning of the parcel to be described, which point is marked by a Judicial Landmark set pursuant to Torrens Case No. 16472; thence South 2 degrees 46 minutes 47 seconds East a distance of 325.86 feet, to a point marked by a Judicial Landmark set pursuant to Torrens Case No. 16472; thence easterly, parallel with the north line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, a distance of 155.84 feet, to a point marked by a Judicial Landmark set pursuant to Torrens Case No. 16964; thence continue easterly, parallel with the north line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, a distance of 63.60 feet, to the west line of that portion of Texas Avenue as dedicated in JOHNSON'S AND BRANT'S ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, said Hennepin County; thence North 0 degrees 57 minutes 27 seconds West, along said west line of that portion of Texas Avenue and its northerly extension, a distance of 280.80 feet, to the intersection with a line drawn 50.00 feet southerly of and parallel with the following described ³/LQH $´ thence northwesterly 235.64 feet, along said parallel line, being an 843.94 foot radius non-tangential curve, concave to the northeast, having a central angle of 15 degrees 59 minutes 52 seconds, the chord of said curve is 234.88 feet in length and bears North 78 degrees 59 minutes 01 seconds West, to the point of beginning and there terminating. ³/LQH $´ is described as beginning at the northeast corner of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 5; thence westerly, along the north line of said Southwest Quarter, a distance of 2421.40 feet; thence northwesterly a distance of 484.58 feet along a tangential curve, concave to the north, having a radius of 793.94 feet DQGDFHQWUDODQJOHRIGHJUHHVPLQXWHVVHFRQGVDQGVDLG³/LQH$´WKHUHWHUPLQDWLQJ TITLE COMMITMENT EXCEPTIONS (Per Schedule B, Part II of the herein referenced Title Commitment) The property depicted on this survey and the easements of record shown hereon are the same as Parcel 8 and the easements described in the Commitment for Title Insurance issued by Old Republic National Title Insurance Company, File No. ORTE743057, dated March 16, 2016. The numbers below correspond to those in the title commitment. 1 - 7 do not require comment. 8. Application to Register Title per Doc. No. A10261173. Due to inadequacies in the legal description of Parcel 8 hereon this action to Register the Title to this property is proceeding using the Proposed Description dated June 28, 2016 shown hereon. 9. This Resolution, per Doc. No. A10273647, reflects the approval by the City Council of St. Louis Park, Minnesota of the Final Plat of this site titled ARLINGTON ROW APARTMENTS WEST. This plat has not been recorded yet. ALTA/NSPS OPTIONAL TABLE A NOTES (The following items refer to Table A optional survey responsibilities and specifications) 1. Monuments placed (or a reference monument or witness to the corner) at all major corners of the boundary of the property, unless already marked or referenced by existing monuments or witnesses to the corner are shown hereon. 2. The address, if disclosed in documents provided to or obtained by the surveyor, or observed while conducting the fieldwork is unassigned. 3. This property is contained in Zone X (areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain) per Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel No. 270184 0332 E, effective date of September 2, 2004. 4. The Gross land area is 66,682 +/- square feet or 1.53 +/- acres. 6. (a) The current Zoning for the subject property is PUD (Planned unit Development) per the City of St. Louis Park's zoning map dated February 2, 2015. (b) We have not received the current zoning classification and building setback requirements from the client. 7. (a) There are no visible buildings on this site. 8. Substantial features observed in the process of conducting fieldwork, are shown hereon. 9. There are no striped parking stalls on this site. 10 (a)&(b) There are no observable buildings on this site therefore these items do not apply. 11. We have shown underground utilities on and/or serving the surveyed property per Gopher State One-Call Ticket No's 151250775 and 151250778. The following utilities and municipalities were notified: CENTER POINT ENERGY (800) 778-9140 CENTER POINT ENERGY (406) 541-9571 CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY (763) 593-8030 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK (952) 924-2562 COMCAST (612) 522-8141 DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION (951) 366-5750 SPRINT/LONG DISTANCE (800) 521-0579 WINDSTREAM COMMUNICATIONS (763) 682-3514 XCEL ENERGY (800) 848-7558 CENTURYLINK (855) 742-6062 i. Utility operators do not consistently respond to locate requests through the Gopher State One Call service for surveying purposes such as this. Those utility operators that do respond, often will not locate utilities from their main line to the customer's structure or facility. They consider those utilities ßSULYDWHà installations that are outside their jurisdiction. These ßSULYDWHà utilities on the surveyed property or adjoining properties, may not be located since most operators will not mark such "private" utilities. A private utility locator may be contacted to investigate these utilities further, if requested by the client. ii. The locations of underground utility lines shown hereon is an approximation based on available maps, unless otherwise noted on the survey. iii. Maps provided by those notified above, either along with a field location or in lieu of such a location, are very often inaccurate or inconclusive. EXTREME CAUTION MUST BE EXERCISED BEFORE AN EXCAVATION TAKES PLACE ON OR NEAR THIS SITE. BEFORE DIGGING, YOU ARE REQUIRED BY LAW TO NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE AT 811 or (651) 454-0002. 12. Governmental Agency survey-related requirements as specified by the client: HUD Surveyor's Report attached. 13. The names of the adjoining owners, as shown hereon, are based on information obtained from current tax records. 16. We are not aware of any evidence of recent earth moving work, building construction or building additions observed in the process of conducting our field work. 17. We are not aware of any proposed changes in street right of way lines or evidence of recent street or sidewalk construction or repairs observed in the process of conducting our field work, except: It is anticipated that the east 33.00 feet of the site will be dedicated as public street on the proposed plat of ARLINGTON ROW APARTMENTS WEST. 18. We have not been provided with any information on wetland delineation markers, as determined by a qualified specialist. 19. We are not aware of any plottable offsite (i.e., appurtenant) easements or servitudes for this site. SCALE IN FEET 0 30 N Revisions: S15186-MASTER.DWG/WEST 06-09-15 07-17-15 04-12-16 05-09-16 06-15-16 06-28-16 DRAWING ISSUED PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION ADDED JLM NEAR NW CORNER UPDATE TO 2016 AND HUD REPORT NEW N. LINE & PROPOSED DESC. PROP. DESCRIPTION/HUD REPORT 06-09-15 SURVEY REPORT 1. The Surveyor was not provided utility easement documents for the subject property except for those shown on the Survey. 2. Note that the westerly line of the subject property is described as ³WKHQFH VRXWK´ The call of ³VRXWK´ is non-surveyable in that there are multiple choices, such as due south, parallel with another line, based on a coordinate system or assumed. We have surveyed the location of this line based upon Judicial Landmarks set pursuant to Torrens Case No. 16472 for the land to the west. The client's counsel may wish to pursue this matter further, so as to clear any title issues that the legal description of this line may cause. 3. Note that the southerly line of the subject property is described in Parcel 8, as deflecting ³WR the left at an angle of 90 degrees 00 PLQXWHV´ This deflection of 90 degrees creates a gap, with the plat to the south, by 0 feet on the westerly end and approximately 10 feet on the easterly end of this southerly line. We have surveyed the location of this line as being parallel with the north line of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and per Judicial Landmarks set pursuant to Torrens Case No.'s 16472 and 16964. Our survey was performed based upon the Proposed Description dated 6/28/16 hereon. 4. Note that we have shown the right-of-way of Texas Avenue South, across the easterly side of the site, as being a right-of-way that extends 33 feet west from the center line of the road. This is per the historic practice of providing 66 feet of right-of-way on roads that develop via prescriptive rights. Based upon contemporary case law this right-of-way could be construed to be of more or less width based upon a determination of what area is actually being utilized for highway purposes including drainage and possibly slopes. 5. Snow and ice conditions during winter months may obscure otherwise visible evidence of on site improvements and/or utilities. 6. The bearings for this survey are based on the Hennepin County Coordinate System NAD 83 (1986 Adjust). CERTIFICATION To Department of Housing and Urban Development; Dougherty Mortgage, LLC; Arlington Row LLC; Melrose Company, LLC; and Old Republic National Title Insurance Company: This is to certify that this map or plat and the survey on which it is based were made in accordance with the 2016 Minimum Standard Detail Requirements for ALTA/NSPS Land Title Surveys, jointly established and adopted by ALTA and NSPS, and includes Items 1 - 4, 6(a), 6(b), 7(a), 8, 9, 10(a), 10(b), 11, 12, 13, 16, 17, 18 and 19 of Table A thereof. The field work was completed on April 7, 2016. Date of Plat or Map: June 28, 2016 ________________________________________ Paul J. McGinley, PLS Minnesota License No. 16099 pmcginley@loucksinc.com SITE A City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016(Item No. 4g) Title: Second Reading Arlington Row West Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment Page 6 07/15/16 100% CD's - JPS REVIEW 07/15/16 - 100% CD'S LOUCKS W:\2015\15186.0A\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\C1-1 EXISTINGPlotted: 07 /15 / 2016 8:58 AM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. CADD QUALIFICATION SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL Arlington Row Apartments West Texas Ave Site A St. Louis Park, MN Melrose Company 22375 Murray Street Excelsior, MN 55331 07/10/15 CITY SUBMITTAL 08/10/15 CITY RE-SUBMITTAL 08/19/15 CITY RE-SUBMITTAL 09/08/15 CITY RE-SUBMITTAL 09/25/15 CITY RE-SUBMITTAL 10/09/15 CITY COMMENTS 12/18/15 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 01/29/16 100% DD Documents Site A 04/27/16 100% DD Documents Site A 05/27/16 HUD Review Response Items 05/27/16 100% CD's C1.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C2.1 SITE PLAN C3.1 GRADING PLAN C3.2 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C3.3 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C3.4 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C4.1 SANITARY & WATERMAIN C4.2 STORM SEWER C8.1 DETAILS C8.2 CITY DETAILS L1.1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2.1 TREE INVENTORY PLAN HUD Project # 092-35807 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. PJ Disch - PE 49933 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. 07/15/2016 15186A PJD PJD PJD N WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. EXISTING CONDITIONS C1.1 SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 SITE A City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016(Item No. 4g) Title: Second Reading Arlington Row West Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment Page 7 SCALE IN FEET 0 30 N LOUCKS KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Arlington Row, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, fee owner of the following described property situated in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, to wit: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 5, Township 117 North, Range 21 West, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence South 89 degrees 57 minutes 27 seconds East (assumed bearing), along the north line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, a distance of 198.00 feet; thence South 2 degrees 29 minutes 51 seconds West a distance of 4.15 feet to the intersection with a line drawn 50.00 feet southerly of and parallel with the following described ³/LQH $´ said point of intersection being the point of beginning of the parcel to be described, which point is marked by a Judicial Landmark set pursuant to Torrens Case No. 16472; thence South 2 degrees 46 minutes 47 seconds East a distance of 325.86 feet, to a point marked by a Judicial Landmark set pursuant to Torrens Case No. 16472; thence easterly, parallel with the north line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, a distance of 155.84 feet, to a point marked by a Judicial Landmark set pursuant to Torrens Case No. 16964; thence continue easterly, parallel with the north line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, a distance of 63.60 feet, to the west line of that portion of Texas Avenue as dedicated in JOHNSON'S AND BRANT'S ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, said Hennepin County; thence North 0 degrees 57 minutes 27 seconds West, along said west line of that portion of Texas Avenue and its northerly extension, a distance of 280.80 feet, to the intersection with a line drawn 50.00 feet southerly of and parallel with the following described ³/LQH $´ thence northwesterly 235.64 feet, along said parallel line, being an 843.94 foot radius non-tangential curve, concave to the northeast, having a central angle of 15 degrees 59 minutes 52 seconds, the chord of said curve is 234.88 feet in length and bears North 78 degrees 59 minutes 01 seconds West, to the point of beginning and there terminating. ³/LQH $´ is described as beginning at the northeast corner of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 5; thence westerly, along the north line of said Southwest Quarter, a distance of 2421.40 feet; thence northwesterly a distance of 484.58 feet along a tangential curve, concave to the north, having a radius of 793.94 feet and a central angle of 34 degrees 58 minutes 15 VHFRQGVDQGVDLG³/LQH$´WKHUHWHUPLQDWLQJ Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as ARLINGTON ROW APARTMENTS WEST, and does hereby dedicate to the public for public use forever the public ways and the easements for drainage and utility purposes as shown on this plat. In witness whereof said Arlington Row, LLC has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this ______ day of ____________________, 201_____. ARLINGTON ROW, LLC ____________________________________ (Signature) ____________________________________ (Title) State of ______________ County of ______________ This instrument was acknowledged before me this _________ day of ________________________, 201_____ by _________________________________, ________________________________ of Arlington Row, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. _________________________________________ (Signature) _________________________________________ (Printed Name) Notary Public ____________________ County, _______________ My Commission Expires January 31, 20_____ SURVEYORS CERTIFICATION I, Paul J. McGinley, do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. Dated this ______ day of __________________, 201____ __________________________________ Paul J. McGinley, Licensed Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 26724 State of Minnesota County of Hennepin This instrument was acknowledged before me this ______ day of __________________, 201_____ by Paul J. McGinley, a Licensed Land Surveyor. _________________________________________ (Signature) _________________________________________ (Printed Name) Notary Public Hennepin County, Minnesota My Commission Expires January 31, 2020 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA This plat of ARLINGTON ROW APARTMENTS WEST was approved and accepted by the City Council of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, at a regular meeting thereof held this ______ day of _________________, 201_____. If applicable, the written comments and recommendations of the Commissioner of Transportation and the County Highway Engineer have been received by the City or the prescribed 30 day period has elapsed without receipt of such comments and recommendations, as provided by Minn. Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. CITY COUNCIL OF ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA By: __________________________________, Mayor By: __________________________________, Manager RESIDENT AND REAL ESTATE SERVICES, Hennepin County, Minnesota I hereby certify that taxes payable in 201____ and prior years have been paid for land described on this plat, dated this ____________ day of _________________________, 201_____. Mark V. Chapin, Hennepin County Auditor By: ___________________________________, Deputy SURVEY DIVISION, Hennepin County, Minnesota Pursuant to MN. STAT. Sec. 383B.565 (1969) this plat has been approved this ________ day of __________________________, 201_____. Chris F. Mavis, Hennepin County Surveyor By: ____________________________________ REGISTRAR OF TITLES, Hennepin County, Minnesota I hereby certify that the within plat of PLAT NAME was filed in this office this _______ day of _________________, 20___, at ______ o'clock ____ .M. Martin McCormick, Registrar of Titles By: ____________________________________, Deputy City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016(Item No. 4g) Title: Second Reading Arlington Row West Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment Page 8 18.025.018.0 8.0 8.5 MODULAR RETAINING WALL MODULAR RETAINING WALL WITH RAILING WHERE WALL IS 30" OR TALLER BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK TYP. (5) CONCRETE PATIOS WITH SCREEN WALL. SEE ARCHITECTURAL (5) CONCRETE PATIOS WITH SCREEN WALL. SEE ARCHITECTURAL CONCRETE SIDEWALK TYP. CONCRETE SIDEWALK TYP. CONCRETE PAVEMENT TRASH & RECYCLE ENCLOSURE W/CONCRETE PAVEMENT WITH MASONRY WALLS TO MATCH BUILDING. SEE ARCHITECTURAL 3 STAIRS 2 STAIRS 2 STAIRS SEE ARCHITECTURAL 2 STAIRS SEE ARCHITECTURAL 2 STAIRS SEE ARCHITECTURAL 2 STAIRS SEE ARCHITECTURAL PEDESTRIAN RAMP PEDESTRIAN RAMP BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 8.5 18.0 24.0 18.0 8.5 8.0 (7) BIKE STALLS (25) INTERIOR BIKE STORAGE (8) BIKE STALLS CONNECT SIDEWALK TO EXISTING PEDESTRIAN RAMP PEDESTRIAN RAMP 9.7 14.6 12.6 17.8 19.0 38.4 6.0 6.0 6' TALL CEDAR FENCE 1' BEHIND RETAINING WALL 6.0 5.0 5.0 6.8 11.1 4.0 11.8 13.2 R3.0 R3.0 R12.0 R3.0 R3.0 R3.0 R3.0 R8.0 R8.0 13.3 45.6 200.0 5.7 25.6 23.4 10.8 5.0 5.0 9.6 17.2 17.9 6.8 6.8 9.1 4.9 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN SOLAR CANOPY COLUMN. COORDINATE FOOTING LOCATION WITH CURB & GUTTER. 28.1 13.7 46.5 7.2 55.0 07/15/16 100% CD's - JPS REVIEW 07/15/16 - 100% CD'S LOUCKS W:\2015\15186.0A\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\C2-1 SITE PLANPlotted: 07 /15 / 2016 8:59 AM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. CADD QUALIFICATION SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL Arlington Row Apartments West Texas Ave Site A St. Louis Park, MN Melrose Company 22375 Murray Street Excelsior, MN 55331 07/10/15 CITY SUBMITTAL 08/10/15 CITY RE-SUBMITTAL 08/19/15 CITY RE-SUBMITTAL 09/08/15 CITY RE-SUBMITTAL 09/25/15 CITY RE-SUBMITTAL 10/09/15 CITY COMMENTS 12/18/15 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 01/29/16 100% DD Documents Site A 04/27/16 100% DD Documents Site A 05/27/16 HUD Review Response Items 05/27/16 100% CD's C1.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C2.1 SITE PLAN C3.1 GRADING PLAN C3.2 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C3.3 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C3.4 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C4.1 SANITARY & WATERMAIN C4.2 STORM SEWER C8.1 DETAILS C8.2 CITY DETAILS L1.1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2.1 TREE INVENTORY PLAN HUD Project # 092-35807 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. PJ Disch - PE 49933 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. 07/15/2016 15186A PJD PJD PJD N WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. SITE PLAN GENERAL NOTES 1.MINIMUM SETBACKS: FRONT BUILDING SETBACK = 13 FT. SIDE BUILDING SETBACK = 10 FT. REAR BUILDING SETBACK = 9 FT. 2.ZONING EXISTING ZONING =R-1 PROPOSED ZONING = PUD 3. PARKING SUMMARY BIKE COUNT SUMMARY SURFACE REGULAR STALLS = 49 1 PER DWELLING = 34 SURFACE HANDICAPPED STALLS = 3 1 PER 10 PARKING STALLS = 6 TOTAL SURFACE STALLS = 52 TOTAL REQUIRED = 40 BIKE STALLS INSIDE = 25 BIKE STALLS OUTSIDE = 15 TOTAL PROPOSED = 40 4. AREA/DENSITY TOTAL AREA = 57,339 SQ.FT. OR 1.316 AC. IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA = 34,647 SQ.FT. OR 0.795 AC. = 60.4% PERVIOUS SURFACE AREA = 22,692 SQ.FT. OR 0.521 AC. = 39.6% 5. ALL PAVING, CONCRETE CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DETAILS SHOWN PER SHEET C8-1 AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. SEE LANDSCAPE AND ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR ANY ADDITIONAL HARDSCAPE APPLICATIONS. 6. THE CITY AND THE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY WORK WITHIN THE STREET RIGHT OF WAY (SIDEWALK, STREET OR DRIVEWAYS) 7. MINNESOTA STATE STATUTE REQUIRES NOTIFICATION PER "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY GRADING, EXCAVATION OR UNDERGROUND WORK. 8. SEE CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS FOR ANY REMOVAL DETAILS. 9. ANY SIGN OR FIXTURES REMOVED WITH IN THE RIGHT OF WAY OR AS PART OF THE SITE WORK SHALL BE REPLACED BY THE CONTRACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY REQUIREMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PRESERVE AND MAINTAIN ANY EXISTING STREET LIGHTS AND TRAFFIC SIGNS PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. 10. CLEAR AND GRUB AND REMOVE ALL TREES, VEGETATION AND SITE DEBRIS PRIOR TO GRADING. ALL REMOVED MATERIAL SHALL BE HAULED FROM THE SITE DAILY. ALL CLEARING AND GRUBBING AND REMOVALS SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY ESTABLISHED UPON REMOVAL. (SEE SHEET C3-1) 11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO OBTAIN ALL PERMITS FROM THE CITY AS REQUIRED FOR ALL WORK WITH THE STREET AND PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. 12. A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF SITE IMPROVEMENTS NOT SHOWN ON THIS SHEET ARE DESCRIBED AND PROVIDED IN FURTHER DETAIL ON THE ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPE PLANS. THIS INCLUDES LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND OTHER FIXTURES. 13. B612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE EDGE OF ALL COMMON DRIVES AND PARKING LOTS. 14. CONSTRUCTION NOTES: A. PEDESTRIAN RAMPS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE LOCATIONS SHOWN AND AS SHOWN PER THE LANDSCAPE SITE PLANS. B. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SAW-CUT BITUMINOUS AND CONCRETE PAVEMENTS AS REQUIRED PER THE SPECIFICATIONS. REMOVE EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER AND INSTALL B618 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER. 15. SEE SHEETS C3-1 AND C4-1 FOR GRADING AND UTILITIES. 16. ALL CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER B612, CITY'S STANDARD PLATES. (SEE DETAIL SHEET). 17. THE INTENT OF THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION IS TO PRESERVE AS MUCH OF THE EXISTING STREET PAVEMENT AS POSSIBLE, AND TO MILL AND OVERLAY. REMOVED PAVEMENT AREAS AND PATCHING SHALL BE INSTALLED PER PAVEMENT SECTION PROVIDED PER DETAIL SHEET. PAVEMENT LEGEND: CONCRETE PAVEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK SITE PLAN C2.1 SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 SITE A City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016(Item No. 4g) Title: Second Reading Arlington Row West Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment Page 9 RAIN GARDEN BOTTOM ELEV=918.5 RAIN GARDEN BOTTOM ELEV=918.5 RAIN GARDEN BOTTOM ELEV=918.5 RAIN GARDEN BOTTOM ELEV=918.5 RAIN GARDEN BOTTOM ELEV=918.5 TW=920.00 GW=920.00 TW=926.00 GW=920.00 TW=925.50 GW=920.00 TW=920.00 GW=920.00 TW=920.00 GW=920.00 TW=927.50 GW=921.00 TW=926.50 GW=920.00 TW=923.00 GW=920.00 TW=920.00 GW=920.00 918.20 TW=923.00 GW=920.00 07/15/16 100% CD's - JPS REVIEW 07/15/16 - 100% CD'S LOUCKS W:\2015\15186.0A\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\C3-1 GRADINGPlotted: 07 /15 / 2016 8:59 AM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. CADD QUALIFICATION SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL Arlington Row Apartments West Texas Ave Site A St. Louis Park, MN Melrose Company 22375 Murray Street Excelsior, MN 55331 07/10/15 CITY SUBMITTAL 08/10/15 CITY RE-SUBMITTAL 08/19/15 CITY RE-SUBMITTAL 09/08/15 CITY RE-SUBMITTAL 09/25/15 CITY RE-SUBMITTAL 10/09/15 CITY COMMENTS 12/18/15 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 01/29/16 100% DD Documents Site A 04/27/16 100% DD Documents Site A 05/27/16 HUD Review Response Items 05/27/16 100% CD's C1.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C2.1 SITE PLAN C3.1 GRADING PLAN C3.2 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C3.3 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C3.4 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C4.1 SANITARY & WATERMAIN C4.2 STORM SEWER C8.1 DETAILS C8.2 CITY DETAILS L1.1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2.1 TREE INVENTORY PLAN HUD Project # 092-35807 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. PJ Disch - PE 49933 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. 07/15/2016 15186A PJD PJD PJD WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF BUILDINGS, VESTIBULES, SLOPED PAVING, EXIT PORCHES, RAMPS, TRUCK DOCKS, ENTRY LOCATIONS AND LOCATIONS OF DOWNSPOUTS. 2. ALL DISTURBED UNPAVED AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE MINIMUM OF 6 INCHES OF TOP SOIL AND SOD OR SEED. THESE AREAS SHALL BE WATERED BY THE CONTRACTOR UNTIL THE SOD OR SEED IS GROWING IN A HEALTHY MANNER. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF THIS PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES OCCURRING DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF THIS PROJECT. 4. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGMEN AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. PLACEMENT OF THESE DEVICES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO THE APPROPRIATE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARDS. 5. IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERALLY ACCEPTED CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES, THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE SOLELY AND COMPLETELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE, INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY DURING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. THIS REQUIREMENT WILL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS. 6. THE DUTY OF THE ENGINEER OR THE DEVELOPER TO CONDUCT CONSTRUCTION REVIEW OF THE CONTRACTORS PERFORMANCE IS NOT INTENDED TO INCLUDE REVIEW OF THE ADEQUACY OF THE CONTRACTORS SAFETY MEASURES IN, OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 7. BEFORE BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL A TEMPORARY ROCK ENTRANCE PAD AT ALL POINTS OF VEHICLE EXIT FROM THE PROJECT SITE. SAID ROCK ENTRANCE PAD SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT. SEE DETAILS SHOWN ON SHEET C8-1 OF THE PROJECT PLANS. 8. EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE ESTABLISHED AROUND THE ENTIRE SITE PERIMETER AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH NPDES PERMIT REQUIREMENTS, BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES, CITY REQUIREMENTS AND THE DETAILS SHOWN ON SHEET C8-1 OF THE PROJECT PLANS. 9. ALL ENTRANCES AND CONNECTIONS TO CITY STREETS SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL PERMITS AND NOTIFICATIONS AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY. 10. SEE UTILITY PLAN AND STORM SEWER PROFILES FOR FURTHER DETAIL REGARDING THE STORM SEWER. GRADING PLAN C3.1SITE A City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016(Item No. 4g) Title: Second Reading Arlington Row West Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment Page 10 ROCK ENTRANCE PAD INLET PROTECTION TYP INLET PROTECTION TYP 918.20CONCRETE WASHOUT 07/15/16 100% CD's - JPS REVIEW 07/15/16 - 100% CD'S LOUCKS W:\2015\15186.0A\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\C3-2 SWPPPPlotted: 07 /15 / 2016 9:0 AM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. CADD QUALIFICATION SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL Arlington Row Apartments West Texas Ave Site A St. Louis Park, MN Melrose Company 22375 Murray Street Excelsior, MN 55331 07/10/15 CITY SUBMITTAL 08/10/15 CITY RE-SUBMITTAL 08/19/15 CITY RE-SUBMITTAL 09/08/15 CITY RE-SUBMITTAL 09/25/15 CITY RE-SUBMITTAL 10/09/15 CITY COMMENTS 12/18/15 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 01/29/16 100% DD Documents Site A 04/27/16 100% DD Documents Site A 05/27/16 HUD Review Response Items 05/27/16 100% CD's C1.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C2.1 SITE PLAN C3.1 GRADING PLAN C3.2 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C3.3 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C3.4 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C4.1 SANITARY & WATERMAIN C4.2 STORM SEWER C8.1 DETAILS C8.2 CITY DETAILS L1.1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2.1 TREE INVENTORY PLAN HUD Project # 092-35807 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. PJ Disch - PE 49933 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. 07/15/2016 15186A PJD PJD PJD N WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C3.2 SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 SITE VICINITY MAP CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER SPECIAL WATERS SEARCH MAP PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT INFILTRATION STORMWATER HARVEST AND REUSE FILTRATION WET SEDIMENTATION BASIN REGIONAL PONDING X ESTIMATED QUANTITIES DESCRIPTION UNIT TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EA PREFABRICATED CONCRETE WASHOUT EA SILT FENCE (STANDARD)LF EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SY INLET PROTECTION EA QUANTITY 1 1 510 600 8 SEEDING/SOD AC 0.50 INLET PROTECTION SWPPP LEGEND SILT FENCE EXISTING DRAINAGE PATTERN PROPOSED DRAINAGE PATTERN PROJECT LOCATION SITE A City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016(Item No. 4g) Title: Second Reading Arlington Row West Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment Page 11 SAN INV= 911.00 6" FIRE SERVICE 2" DOMESTIC SERVICE WITH 2" COMPOUND METER W/STRAINER & BY-PASS CITY OWNED LOCK 6" FIRE SERVICE 2" DOMESTIC SERVICE WITH 2" COMPOUND METER W/STRAINER & BY-PASS CITY OWNED LOCK SAN INV= 911.00 8x6x8 TEE WITH 6" GATE VALVE & 6" DIP CONNECT TO EXISTING 12" WATER MAIN WITH 8" SERVICE AND GATE VALVE PER CITY STANDARDS CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY STUB. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY THE SIZE OF EXISTING STUB. PRIOR TO CONNECTING TO THE SANITARY STUBS THE CONTRACTOR SHOULD INSPECT AND TELEVISE THE SANITARY LINES 15 LF 6" PVC @ X.XX% CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY STUB. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY THE SIZE OF EXISTING STUB. PRIOR TO CONNECTING TO THE SANITARY STUBS THE CONTRACTOR SHOULD INSPECT AND TELEVISE THE SANITARY LINES 26 LF 6" PVC @ X.XX% INSTALL INSULATION OF DOMESTIC AN FIRE SERVICE. SEE DETAIL ON C8-1 07/15/16 100% CD's - JPS REVIEW 07/15/16 - 100% CD'S LOUCKS W:\2015\15186.0A\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\C4-1 SANITARY & WATERPlotted: 07 /15 / 2016 9:1 AM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. CADD QUALIFICATION SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL Arlington Row Apartments West Texas Ave Site A St. Louis Park, MN Melrose Company 22375 Murray Street Excelsior, MN 55331 07/10/15 CITY SUBMITTAL 08/10/15 CITY RE-SUBMITTAL 08/19/15 CITY RE-SUBMITTAL 09/08/15 CITY RE-SUBMITTAL 09/25/15 CITY RE-SUBMITTAL 10/09/15 CITY COMMENTS 12/18/15 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 01/29/16 100% DD Documents Site A 04/27/16 100% DD Documents Site A 05/27/16 HUD Review Response Items 05/27/16 100% CD's C1.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C2.1 SITE PLAN C3.1 GRADING PLAN C3.2 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C3.3 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C3.4 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C4.1 SANITARY & WATERMAIN C4.2 STORM SEWER C8.1 DETAILS C8.2 CITY DETAILS L1.1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2.1 TREE INVENTORY PLAN HUD Project # 092-35807 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. PJ Disch - PE 49933 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. 07/15/2016 15186A PJD PJD PJD N WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. SANITARY & WATERMAIN C4.1 UTILITY PLAN GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND WATERMAIN UTILITIES SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPECIFICATIONS, THE CITY AND THE STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATION OF THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM), 1999 EDITION. ALL HDPE CONNECTIONS TO CONCRETE MANHOLES SHALL BE CONNECTED WITH AN INTERNAL RUBBER GASKET OR BY USING ADS WATERSTOP GASKET. ALL SANITARY SEWER MAIN LINE SHALL BE SDR 35. ALL SANITARY SEWER SERVICES SHALL BE SDR 26. 2. SEE SHEET C8-1 AND THE CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS FOR SPECIFIC UTILITY DETAILS AND UTILITY SERVICE DETAILS. 3. ALL UTILITY PIPE BEDDING SHALL BE COMPACTED SAND OR FINE GRANULAR MATERIAL PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. ALL COMPACTION SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CEAM SPECIFICATION. 4. ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. THE CITY DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING AND BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT AND THE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER MUST BE NOTIFIED AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY WORK WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, OR WORK IMPACTING PUBLIC UTILITIES. 5. ALL SANITARY SEWER AND WATER SERVICES SHALL TERMINATE AT THE PROPERTY LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO PERFORMING ANY EXCAVATION OR UNDERGROUND WORK. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD ADJUST WATERMAIN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER, AND SERVICES AS REQUIRED. INSULATION OF WATER AND SANITARY SEWER LINES SHALL BE PROVIDED WHERE 7.5 FEET MINIMUM DEPTH CAN NOT BE ATTAINED. 8. ALL STREET REPAIRS AND PATCHING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE ALL SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED AUTHORITY OF OF THE CITY. 9. ALL NEW WATERMAIN MUST HAVE A MINIMUM OF 7.5 FEET OF COVER. 10. ADJUST ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES, BOTH PUBLIC AND PRIVATE TO THE PROPOSED GRADES WHERE DISTURBED AND COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE UTILITY OWNERS. STRUCTURES BEING RESET TO PAVED AREAS MUST MEET OWNERS REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC LOADING. 11. PROPOSED PIPE MATERIALS: WATERMAIN DIP CLASS 52 NO LESS THAN 7.5' DEEP. SANITARY SEWER PVC SDR 35 NO MORE THAN 20' DEEP. SANITARY SEWER PVC SDR26 20' - 25' DEEP. STORM SEWER RCP CLASS 5 12" TO 18" DIAMETER. DRAINTILE POLYETHYLENE SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 SITE A City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016(Item No. 4g) Title: Second Reading Arlington Row West Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment Page 12 CLEAN OUT RIM=919.00 INV=916.50 4" PERFORATED PVC @ 0.00% CBMH 1 RIM=918.00 INV=915.00 SUMP=912.00 CBMH 2 RIM=918.00 INV=914.86 S INV=914.66 N INV=915.00 E SUMP=911.66 CBMH 3 RIM=918.40 INV=914.54 S INV=914.54 N SUMP=911.54 72 LF - 15" STORM @ 0.20% 58 LF - 15" STORM @ 0.20% CLEAN OUT RIM=919.00 INV=916.50 41 LF - 6" PVC @ 3.66% CBMH 4 RIM=917.80 INV=914.24 S INV=914.04 N SUMP=911.04 46 LF - 6" PVC @ 4.91% 5 LF - 15" STORM @ 0.80% 5 LF - 15" STORM @ 0.80% CLEAN OUT RIM=919.00 INV=916.50 4" PERFORATED PVC @ 0.00% CLEAN OUT RIM=919.00 INV=916.50 8 LF" - 8" PVC @ 2.00% 15" INV 914.50 15" INV 914.00 6" INV 914.75 8" INV 914.30 STMH 5 RIM=918.00 INV=914.14 W (8") INV=911.00 W (4") INV=911.00 E 46 LF - 12" RCP @ 0.25% STMH 6 RIM=918.20 INV=910.88 W 9>F-)! &N 9>F-)! &C BUILD OVER EXISTING 15" STORM SEWER 95 LF - 6" PVC @ 0.75% 64 LF - 6" PVC @ 1.40% 13 LF - 6" PVC @10.94% 36" STORM VAULT (6) 89' - 36" PERFORATED CMP @ 0.00% WITH HEADERS INV=912.50 ROCK INV=912.00 SAND INV=911.00 4" DRAINTILE INV=911.00 SEE DETAIL ON C8-1 6" INV 914.75 9 LF - 6" PVC @ 1.55% CLEAN OUT RIM=918.15 INV=915.79 CLEAN OUT RIM=918.80 INV=914.89 ALL PIPES LOCATED OUTSIDE THE RIGHT-OF-WAY ARE PRIVATE UTILITIES ACCESS MH RIM=919.12 ACCESS MH RIM=918.60 ACCESS MH RIM=918.34 ACCESS MH RIM=918.00 07/15/16 100% CD's - JPS REVIEW 07/15/16 - 100% CD'S LOUCKS W:\2015\15186.0A\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\C4-2 STORMPlotted: 07 /15 / 2016 9:1 AM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. CADD QUALIFICATION SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL Arlington Row Apartments West Texas Ave Site A St. Louis Park, MN Melrose Company 22375 Murray Street Excelsior, MN 55331 07/10/15 CITY SUBMITTAL 08/10/15 CITY RE-SUBMITTAL 08/19/15 CITY RE-SUBMITTAL 09/08/15 CITY RE-SUBMITTAL 09/25/15 CITY RE-SUBMITTAL 10/09/15 CITY COMMENTS 12/18/15 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 01/29/16 100% DD Documents Site A 04/27/16 100% DD Documents Site A 05/27/16 HUD Review Response Items 05/27/16 100% CD's C1.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C2.1 SITE PLAN C3.1 GRADING PLAN C3.2 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C3.3 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C3.4 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C4.1 SANITARY & WATERMAIN C4.2 STORM SEWER C8.1 DETAILS C8.2 CITY DETAILS L1.1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2.1 TREE INVENTORY PLAN HUD Project # 092-35807 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. PJ Disch - PE 49933 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. 07/15/2016 15186A PJD PJD PJD N WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. STORM SEWER C4.2 UTILITY PLAN GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND WATERMAIN UTILITIES SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPECIFICATIONS, THE CITY AND THE STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATION OF THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM), 1999 EDITION. ALL HDPE CONNECTIONS TO CONCRETE MANHOLES SHALL BE CONNECTED WITH AN INTERNAL RUBBER GASKET OR BY USING ADS WATERSTOP GASKET. ALL SANITARY SEWER MAIN LINE SHALL BE SDR 35. ALL SANITARY SEWER SERVICES SHALL BE SDR 26. 2. SEE SHEET C8-1 AND THE CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS FOR SPECIFIC UTILITY DETAILS AND UTILITY SERVICE DETAILS. 3. ALL UTILITY PIPE BEDDING SHALL BE COMPACTED SAND OR FINE GRANULAR MATERIAL PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. ALL COMPACTION SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CEAM SPECIFICATION. 4. ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. THE CITY DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING AND BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT AND THE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER MUST BE NOTIFIED AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY WORK WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, OR WORK IMPACTING PUBLIC UTILITIES. 5. ALL SANITARY SEWER AND WATER SERVICES SHALL TERMINATE AT THE PROPERTY LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO PERFORMING ANY EXCAVATION OR UNDERGROUND WORK. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD ADJUST WATERMAIN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER, AND SERVICES AS REQUIRED. INSULATION OF WATER AND SANITARY SEWER LINES SHALL BE PROVIDED WHERE 7.5 FEET MINIMUM DEPTH CAN NOT BE ATTAINED. 8. ALL STREET REPAIRS AND PATCHING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE ALL SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED AUTHORITY OF OF THE CITY. 9. ALL NEW WATERMAIN MUST HAVE A MINIMUM OF 7.5 FEET OF COVER. 10. ADJUST ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES, BOTH PUBLIC AND PRIVATE TO THE PROPOSED GRADES WHERE DISTURBED AND COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE UTILITY OWNERS. STRUCTURES BEING RESET TO PAVED AREAS MUST MEET OWNERS REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC LOADING. 11. PROPOSED PIPE MATERIALS: WATERMAIN DIP CLASS 52 NO LESS THAN 7.5' DEEP. SANITARY SEWER PVC SDR 35 NO MORE THAN 20' DEEP. SANITARY SEWER PVC SDR26 20' - 25' DEEP. STORM SEWER RCP CLASS 5 12" TO 18" DIAMETER. DRAINTILE POLYETHYLENE STORM SEWER SCHEDULE STRUCTURE NO.CASTING MANHOLE SIZE CBMH 1 48" PRECAST CBMH 2 48" PRECAST CBMH 3 48" PRECAST CBMH 4 48" PRECAST STMH 5 STMH 6 48" PRECASTR-1648 R-2556-A R-2556-A R-2556-A R-2556-A 48" PRECASTR-1648 SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 SITE A City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016(Item No. 4g) Title: Second Reading Arlington Row West Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment Page 13 07/15/16 100% CD's - JPS REVIEW 07/15/16 - 100% CD'S LOUCKS W:\2015\15186.0A\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\C8-1 DETAILPlotted: 07 /15 / 2016 9:1 AM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. CADD QUALIFICATION SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL Arlington Row Apartments West Texas Ave Site A St. Louis Park, MN Melrose Company 22375 Murray Street Excelsior, MN 55331 07/10/15 CITY SUBMITTAL 08/10/15 CITY RE-SUBMITTAL 08/19/15 CITY RE-SUBMITTAL 09/08/15 CITY RE-SUBMITTAL 09/25/15 CITY RE-SUBMITTAL 10/09/15 CITY COMMENTS 12/18/15 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 01/29/16 100% DD Documents Site A 04/27/16 100% DD Documents Site A 05/27/16 HUD Review Response Items 05/27/16 100% CD's C1.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C2.1 SITE PLAN C3.1 GRADING PLAN C3.2 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C3.3 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C3.4 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C4.1 SANITARY & WATERMAIN C4.2 STORM SEWER C8.1 DETAILS C8.2 CITY DETAILS L1.1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2.1 TREE INVENTORY PLAN HUD Project # 092-35807 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. PJ Disch - PE 49933 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. 07/15/2016 15186A PJD PJD PJD DETAILS C8.1 STANDARD GUTTER 8"A 6" 13.5" 1 2" RAD. 24"B624 B618 18" B612 12" CURB TYPE "A" MIN. OF 4" AGG. BASE UNDER CURB (IF TOTAL THICKNESS OF SECTION ALLOWS) 3/8 " LIP 3" RAD. 1 3 3" RAD. AGG. BASE VARIES PAVEMENT SECTION VARIES SEE PAVEMENT SECTION DETAIL SLOPE GUTTER TO MATCH PARKING LOT DRAINAGE (3/4" PER FT. TYP.) TIP GUTTER OUT DRAWN 1/2014 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 2009B6 STYLE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER MINIMUM 1' BEHIND BACK OF CURB 7" SPECIFICATION NOTES: 1. UPON COMPLETION, CURBING SHOULD BE SPRAYED WITH A MEMBRANE CURING COMPOUND PER MNDOT 3754. 2. EXPANSION JOINTS AT MAX. SPACING OF 200'. 3. CONSTRUCT IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT 2531. 2" BIT. WEAR COURSE, MN/DOT 2360 SPWEA240B TACK COAT, MN/DOT 2357 2" BIT. NON-WEAR COURSE, MN/DOT 2360 SPNWB230B 6" AGG. BASE, CLASS 5 OR 2 MN/DOT 3138 SURFACE COMPACTION FINISHED GRADE DRAWN 1/2014 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 2030BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION NOTES: 1. CONCRETE SHOULD BE REINFORCED WITH WELDED WIRE FABRIC OR REINFORCING BARS TO ASSIST IN CONTROLLING CRACKING FROM DRYING SHRINKAGE AND THERMAL CHANGES. 2. SAWED OR FORMED CONTROL JOINTS SHOULD BE INCLUDED FOR EACH 225 SQUARE FEET OF AREA OR LESS (15 FEET BY 15 FEET). 3. SAW CUTS SHOULD NOT CUT THROUGH THE WELDED WIRE FABRIC OR REINFORCING STEEL AND DOWELS SHOULD BE UTILIZED AT FORMED AND/OR COLD JOINTS. 6" COMPACTED AGGREGATE BASE CL. 5 OR 2 MN/DOT 3138 FINISHED GRADE 8" CONCRETE MN/DOT SPEC. 2301 DRAWN 1/2014 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 2033CONCRETE PAVEMENT SECTION DRAWN 1/2014 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 2034CONCRETE SIDEWALK SECTION 4" CONCRETE WALK MN/DOT 2521 4" GRANULAR MATERIAL MN/DOT 3149 WIRE MESH WIRE MESH DRAWN 12/2013 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 3001HEAVY DUTY SILT FENCE 6" 6" GEOTEXTILE FABRIC PER MNDOT 3886 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC PER MNDOT 3886 NOTES: 1. PLACE BOTTOM EDGE OF WIRE FENCE INTO 6 IN DEEP TRENCH. 2. POSTS SHALL BE: •6 FT MAX. SPACING. •STANDARD STEEL T-TYPE POSTS. •5' MIN. LENGTH POSTS, DRIVEN 2 FT INTO THE GROUND. 3. ATTACH WIRE FENCE TO STEEL POSTS WITH NO. 9 GA. ALUMINUM WIRE OR NO. 9 GALVANIZED STEEL PRE-FORMED CLIPS. 4. ATTACH FABRIC TO WIRE FENCING WITH WIRE OR ZIP TIES. A MIN. OF 3 ZIP TIES PER POST. EXTEND BOTTOM OF FABRIC INTO TRENCH. 5. BACKFILL TRENCH & COMPACT. DRAWN 12/2013 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 3010INLET PROTECTION - EXISTING STORM STRUCTURES HIGH-FLOW FABRIC CURB DEFLECTOR PLATE OVERFLOW 1-CENTER OF FILTER ASSEMBLY OVERFLOW 2 - TOP OF CURB BOX POLYESTER SLEEVE MANHOLE COVER ASSEMBLY FILTER ASSEMBLY 27" 27" SEDIMENT CONTROL BARRIER 2'X3' SEDIMENT CONTROL BARRIER ROAD DRAIN HIGH-FLOW INLET PROTECTION CURB AND GUTTER MODEL WIMCO ROAD DRAIN HARD SURFACE PUBLIC ROAD 2' MINIMUM 1" TO 2" WASHED ROCK 6" MINIMUM DRAWN 12/2013 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 3003ROCK ENTRANCE TO CONSTRUCTION SITE NOTES: 1. ROCK SIZE SHOULD BE 1" TO 2" IN SIZE SUCH AS MN/DOT CA-1 OR CA-2 COURSE AGGREGATE. (WASHED) 2. A GEOTEXTILE FABRIC MAY BE USED UNDER THE ROCK TO PREVENT MIGRATION OF THE UNDERLYING SOIL INTO THE STONE. 15' (MIN) SIGN 24"X36"X3/4" PLYWOOD PAINT PLYWOOD FACE WHITE WITH 4"MIN. STENCILED LETTERS PAINTED BLACK 8'TREATED 4"X4" POST CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA WASHOUT AREA MUST BE IMPERMEABLE. CONTRACTOR TO CONSTRUCT APPROPRIATE IMPERMEABLE CONTAINMENT SYSTEM & REMOVE/PUMP LIQUID ONCE THE LEVEL EXCEEDS TWO-THIRDS OF THE SURROUNDING BARRIER CONTRACTOR TO PLACE THE CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE MIN. 8" DIA BIO LOGS MIN. 2FT HIGH SOIL BERM DRAWN 12/2013 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 3005CONCRETE WASHOUT NOTE: GRANULAR MATERIALS FURNISHED FOR USE IN FOUNDATION, BEDDING, ENCASEMENT, OR BACKFILL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS: •FOUNDATION MATERIALS SHALL HAVE 100% PASSING THE 1 1/2" SIEVE AND A MAXIMUM OF 10% PASSING THE No. 4 SIEVE. NOT LESS THAN 50% OF THE MATERIAL RETAINED BY THE No. 4 SIEVE SHALL HAVE ONE (1) OR MORE CRUSHED FACES. HARD, DURABLE CRUSHED CARBONATE QUARRY ROCK MAY BE USED FOR FOUNDATION MATERIALS. •BEDDING AND ENCASEMENT MATERIALS FOR FLEXIBLE PIPE SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF MNDOT SPECIFICATION 3149.2B1, GRANULAR BORROW, EXCEPT THAT 100% SHALL PASS THE ONE INCH (1") SIEVE. •BACKFILL MATERIALS SHALL CONSIST OF SUITABLE EXISTING TRENCH MATERIALS, EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. SUITABLE MATERIAL SHALL BE DEFINED AS A MINERAL SOIL FREE OF FOREIGN MATERIALS (RUBBISH, ORGANICS & DEBRIS), FROZEN CLUMPS, OVERSIZE STONE, ROCK, CONCRETE OR BITUMINOUS CHUNKS, AND OTHER UNSUITABLE MATERIALS THAT MAY DAMAGE PIPE, PREVENT THOROUGH COMPACTION, OR INCREASE THE RISKS OF SETTLEMENT. DRAWN 12/2013 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 4008PLASTIC PIPE BEDDING PLASTIC PIPE 18"18"PIPE WIDTH ENCASEMENT BEDDING FOUNDATION (MAY NOT BE REQUIRED) 12" 6" BACKFILL COMPACTED AS SPECIFIED EXCAVATED TRENCH WIDTH DRAWN 12/2013 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 4310CONCRETE PIPE BEDDING RCP PIPE 18"18"PIPE WIDTH COMPACTED SAND OR 3 4" TO 1-1 2" CLEAR ROCK (AS DIRECTED) COMPACTED SUBGRADE 6" RCP PIPE 18"18"PIPE WIDTH SHAPE BOTTOM OF EXISTING TRENCH MATERIAL TO FIT PIPE BARREL. COMPACTED BACKFILL EXCAVATED TRENCH WIDTH CLASS C BEDDING CLASS B BEDDING COMPACTED BACKFILL EXCAVATED TRENCH WIDTH PAVEMENT SECTION BASED ON GEOTECHNICAL REPORT BY BRAUN INTERTEC, DATED MAY 28,2015 NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL REQUIRED CMP, PIPE BENDS AND TEES TO CONNECT PIPES AT THE LIMITS OF THE UNDERGROUND PIPE SYSTEM FOOTPRINT. (SEE UTILITY PLAN) 2. 4" PVC DRAINTILE SHALL FOLLOW 48" CMP PIPES AS SHOW ABOVE AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE PIPE SYSTEM. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL TEES AS NECESSARY TO CONNECT DRAINTILE OUTLET MANHOLE. 36" CMP 36" CMP 4" SLOTTED SINGLE WALL HDPE PIPING WITH CIRCULAR KNIT POLYMERIC FILAMENT FILTER SOCK PER ASTM D6707-01 FREE DRAINING ANGULAR WASHED STONE 2" TO 3" MAX. PARTICLE SIZE NO CARBONATE 12" FREE DRAINING GRAVEL SAND (GW, GP, GM 0R SW) PARTICLE SIZE - 0.02-0.04 INCHES 12" 36" FILTER FABRIC SEPARATOR 12"18"36" CMP 18" FILTER FABRIC SEPARATOR 6" 6" IE= 912.5 IE= 912.0 IE= 911.0 IE= 915.5 IE= 916.0 (6) 89 LF OF 36" PERFORATED CMP SEE SHEET C4-2 FOR LAYOUT18" 36" PERFORATED PIPE SYSTEM LOUCKS PLATE NO. DRAWN 12/2013 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 4608TYPICAL WATERMAIN INSULATION 2" W.M. 36" PERFORATED PIPE 2 ' 6" MIN. 12" MAX. 4" 4" FLAT SHEET EXTRUDED POLYSTYRENE FOAM INSULATION, DOW HIGHLOAD 40 RIGID BOARD. OVERLAP INSULATION AT JOINTS. 8' NOTES: 6" HUB WITH THREADED PVC PLUG - DO NOT GLUE CASTING MAY BE REQUIRED SEE SPECIFICATIONS END OF LINE CLEANOUT IN LINE CLEANOUT PVC LONG SWEEP BEND SCH. 40 VARIES VARIES ONE PIECE 6" PVC SCH. 40 CLEANOUT RISER DRAWN 01/2015 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 4314ADRAINTILE CLEAN-OUT STRUCTURE 4.0' 3H:1 V M A X. 3H : 1 V M A X . 1' GRANULAR MATERIAL 1.0' PLANTING MEDIUM (70% SEMI-COARSE WASHED SAND & 30% MnDOT GRADE 2 COMPOST BY VOLUME INSITU SOILS SHOULD BE SCARIFIED OR RIPPED TO AT LEAST 12" DEEP BEFORE PLACING THE GRAVEL LAYER. NOTE: 1. BIOFILTRATION AREA MAY ONLY BE EXCAVATED TO ITS BASE AFTER THE CONTRIBUTING WATERSHED IS STABLE. 2. THE FINAL GRADING OF THE BIOFILTRATION BASIN SHOULD FOLLOW THIS DETAIL WITH UNDULATIONS IN THE BOTTOM OF THE BASIN. IT SHOULD NOT BE GRADED FLAT. THIS WILL INCREASE THE CHANCES OF ADEQUATE VEGETATION TAKING HOLD IN WET CONDITIONS. 4" PERFORATED PIPE PLACED IN THE BOTTOM OF THE 1' GRANULAR MATERIAL WITH GEOTEXTILE FABRIC WRAP MN/DOT 3733-TYPE I. RAIN GARDEN 2oz NONWOVEN FILTER FABRIC SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR PLANTINGS 4" DRAIN TILE 6" W.M. 8' SITE A TYPICAL ADA WHEELCHAIR SYMBOL & PARKING SIGN "PARKING BY DISABLED PERMIT ONLY" ATTACH SIGN TO POST WITH APPROPRIATE STAINLESS STEEL BOLTS, WASHERS & NUTS. (TYP. AT TOP & BOTTOM OF SIGN) "VAN ACCESSIBLE" SIGN GRADE NOTES: 1. PROVIDE (1) SIGN PER STALL 2. SIGN MUST MEET LOCAL STANDARDS PROVIDE PAINTED WHEELCHAIR SYMBOL AT EACH DESIGNATED HANDICAP PARKING STALL. CENTER SYMBOL IN STALL. ALL LINES 5" WIDE 10" DIAMETER WHEELCHAIR SYMBOL NOT TO SCALE HANDICAP PARKING SIGN NOT TO SCALE 67.5 5 "HANDICAP DROP-OFF ZONE NO PARKING" ATTACH SIGN TO POST WITH APPROPRIATE STAINLESS STEEL BOLTS, WASHERS & NUTS. (TYP. AT TOP & BOTTOM OF SIGN) GRADE NOTES: 1. PROVIDE (1) SIGN PER ACCESS AISLE 2. SIGN MUST MEET LOCAL STANDARDS HANDICAP ACCESS ISLE NO PARKING SIGN NOT TO SCALE DRAWN 2/2016 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 2038LOUCKS City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016(Item No. 4g) Title: Second Reading Arlington Row West Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment Page 14 07/15/16 100% CD's - JPS REVIEW 07/15/16 - 100% CD'S LOUCKS W:\2015\15186.0A\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\C8-2 CITY DETAILPlotted: 07 /15 / 2016 9:2 AM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. CADD QUALIFICATION SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL Arlington Row Apartments West Texas Ave Site A St. Louis Park, MN Melrose Company 22375 Murray Street Excelsior, MN 55331 07/10/15 CITY SUBMITTAL 08/10/15 CITY RE-SUBMITTAL 08/19/15 CITY RE-SUBMITTAL 09/08/15 CITY RE-SUBMITTAL 09/25/15 CITY RE-SUBMITTAL 10/09/15 CITY COMMENTS 12/18/15 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 01/29/16 100% DD Documents Site A 04/27/16 100% DD Documents Site A 05/27/16 HUD Review Response Items 05/27/16 100% CD's C1.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C2.1 SITE PLAN C3.1 GRADING PLAN C3.2 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C3.3 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C3.4 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C4.1 SANITARY & WATERMAIN C4.2 STORM SEWER C8.1 DETAILS C8.2 CITY DETAILS L1.1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2.1 TREE INVENTORY PLAN HUD Project # 092-35807 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. PJ Disch - PE 49933 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. 07/15/2016 15186A PJD PJD PJD WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. CITY DETAILS C8.2SITE A City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016(Item No. 4g) Title: Second Reading Arlington Row West Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment Page 15 2 AH 4 FD 4 DW 4 DH 4 FD 3 GF 6 SD 6 FD 6 DH 6 DW 6 FD 3 TY 6 KG 5 LL 4 AH 5 KG 7 AH 8 KG 9 AH 6 KG 2 SH 3 AH 4 AP 2 IL 1 BO 3 BS 15 SJ 1 BO7 GS 3 SH 4 GS 7 SD 9 FD 1 IL 1 BO 3 BS 3 TH 3 PC 3 AH 5 AP 1 VE 5 GF 8 KG 3 GF 12 SD 4 GS 1 BO 8 SD 10 DW 9 AH 17 SD 3 AH 10 GF 11 SD 9 BH 4 DH 2 GS 3 GS 7 DH 8 BH 3 GS 6 DH 3 BH 1 VE 07/15/16 100% CD's - JPS REVIEW 07/15/16 - 100% CD'S LOUCKS W:\2015\15186.0A\CADD DATA\LANDSCAPE\_dwg Sheet Files\L1-1Plotted: 07 /15 / 2016 9:7 AM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. CADD QUALIFICATION SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL Arlington Row Apartments West Texas Ave Site A St. Louis Park, MN Melrose Company 22375 Murray Street Excelsior, MN 55331 07/10/15 CITY SUBMITTAL 08/10/15 CITY RE-SUBMITTAL 08/19/15 CITY RE-SUBMITTAL 09/08/15 CITY RE-SUBMITTAL 09/25/15 CITY RE-SUBMITTAL 10/09/15 CITY COMMENTS 12/18/15 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 01/29/16 100% DD Documents Site A 04/27/16 100% DD Documents Site A 05/27/16 HUD Review Response Items 05/27/16 100% CD's C1.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C2.1 SITE PLAN C3.1 GRADING PLAN C3.2 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C3.3 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C3.4 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C4.1 SANITARY & WATERMAIN C4.2 STORM SEWER C8.1 DETAILS C8.2 CITY DETAILS L1.1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2.1 TREE INVENTORY PLAN HUD Project # 092-35807 GENERAL NOTES CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT SITE PRIOR TO SUBMITTING BID. HE SHALL INSPECT SITE AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS RELATING TO THE NATURE AND SCOPE OF WORK. VERIFY LAYOUT AND ANY DIMENSIONS SHOWN AND BRING TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ANY DISCREPANCIES WHICH MAY COMPROMISE THE DESIGN AND/OR INTENT OF THE PROJECT'S LAYOUT. ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE WORK OR MATERIALS SUPPLIED. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL EXISTING ROADS, CURBS/GUTTERS, TRAILS, TREES, LAWNS AND SITE ELEMENTS DURING PLANTING OPERATIONS. ANY DAMAGE TO SAME SHALL BE REPAIRED AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALIGNMENT AND LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND AND ABOVE GRADE UTILITIES AND PROVIDE THE NECESSARY PROTECTION FOR SAME BEFORE CONSTRUCTION / MATERIAL INSTALLATION BEGINS (MINIMUM 10' - 0" CLEARANCE). ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHALL BE LAID SO THAT TRENCHES DO NOT CUT THROUGH ROOT SYSTEMS OF ANY EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN. EXISTING CONTOURS, TRAILS, VEGETATION, CURB/GUTTER AND OTHER EXISTING ELEMENTS BASED UPON INFORMATION SUPPLIED TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BY OTHERS. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ANY AND ALL DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF SAME. THE ALIGNMENT AND GRADES OF THE PROPOSED WALKS, TRAILS AND/OR ROADWAYS ARE SUBJECT TO FIELD ADJUSTMENT REQUIRED TO CONFORM TO LOCALIZED TOPOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS AND TO MINIMIZE TREE REMOVAL AND GRADING. ANY CHANGE IN ALIGNMENT MUST BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION: COORDINATE THE PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION AND PLANTING INSTALLATION WITH OTHER CONTRACTORS WORKING ON SITE. NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL COMPLETE GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. WHERE SOD/SEED ABUTS PAVED SURFACES, FINISHED GRADE OF SOD/SEED SHALL BE HELD 1" BELOW SURFACE ELEVATION OF TRAIL, SLAB, CURB, ETC. SEED ALL AREAS DISTURBED DUE TO GRADING OTHER THAN THOSE AREAS NOTED TO RECEIVE SOD. SEED SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MULCHED AS PER MNDOT SPECS. SOD ALL DESIGNATED AREAS DISTURBED DUE TO GRADING. SOD SHALL BE LAID PARALLEL TO THE CONTOURS AND SHALL HAVE STAGGERED JOINTS. ON SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 OR IN DRAINAGE SWALES, THE SOD SHALL BE STAKED TO THE GROUND. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, ALL SHRUBS SHALL HAVE AT LEAST 5 CANES AT THE SPECIFIED MINIMUM SHRUB HEIGHT OR WIDTH. ORNAMENTAL TREES SHALL HAVE NO V CROTCHES AND SHALL BEGIN BRANCHING NO LOWER THAN 3' ABOVE ROOT BALL. STREET AND BOULEVARD TREES SHALL BEGIN BRANCHING NO LOWER THAN 5' ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. ANY CONIFEROUS TREE PREVIOUSLY PRUNED FOR CHRISTMAS TREE SALES SHALL NOT BE USED. ALL CONIFEROUS TREES SHALL BE FULL FORM, NATURAL TO THE SPECIES, WITHOUT PRUNING. PLAN TAKES PRECEDENCE OVER PLANT SCHEDULE IF DISCREPANCIES IN QUANTITIES EXIST. SPECIFICATIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER NOTES. NO PLANT MATERIAL SUBSTITUTIONS WILL BE ACCEPTED UNLESS APPROVAL IS REQUESTED OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF A BID AND/OR QUOTATION. ALL PROPOSED PLANTS SHALL BE LOCATED AND STAKED AS SHOWN ON PLAN. ADJUSTMENTS IN LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLANT MATERIALS MAY BE NEEDED IN FIELD. SHOULD AN ADJUSTMENT BE ADVISED, THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST BE NOTIFIED. ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE FERTILIZED UPON INSTALLATION WITH A 27-3-3 SLOW RELEASE FERTILIZER MIXED IN WITH THE PLANTING SOIL PER THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. PLANTS MAY BE TREATED FOR SUMMER AND FALL INSTALLATION WITH AN APPLICATION OF GRANULAR 27-3-3 AT 6 OZ PER 2.5" CALIPER PER TREE AND 3 OZ PER SHRUB WITH AN ADDITIONAL APPLICATION OF 27-3-3 THE FOLLOWING SPRING IN THE TREE SAUCER. ALL PLANTING AREAS RECEIVING GROUND COVER, PERENNIALS, ANNUALS, AND/OR VINES SHALL RECEIVE A MINIMUM OF 12" DEPTH OF PLANTING SOIL CONSISTING OF AT LEAST 45 PARTS TOPSOIL, 45 PARTS PEAT OR MANURE AND 10 PARTS SAND. ALL PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER PLANTING DETAILS. REMOVE ALL FLAGGING AND LABELS FROM PLANTS. WRAPPING MATERIAL SHALL BE CORRUGATED PVC PIPING 1" GREATER IN CALIPER THAN THE TREE BEING PROTECTED OR QUALITY, HEAVY, WATERPROOF CREPE PAPER MANUFACTURED FOR THIS PURPOSE. WRAP ALL DECIDUOUS TREES PLANTED IN THE FALL PRIOR TO 12-1 AND REMOVE ALL WRAPPING AFTER 5-1. BLACK METAL EDGER TO BE USED TO CONTAIN SHRUBS, PERENNIALS, AND ANNUALS WHERE BED MEETS SOD/SEED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. ALL ANNUAL AND PERENNIAL PLANTING BEDS TO RECEIVE 3" DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH WITH NO WEED BARRIER. ALL SHRUB BED MASSINGS TO RECEIVE 3" DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH AND FIBER MAT WEED BARRIER. ALL TREES TO RECEIVE 4" DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH WITH NO MULCH IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH TREE TRUNK. SPREAD GRANULAR PRE EMERGENT HERBICIDE (PREEN OR EQUAL) PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS UNDER ALL MULCHED AREAS. MAINTENANCE STRIPS TO HAVE EDGER AND MULCH AS SPECIFIED/INDICATED ON DRAWING OR IN SPECIFICATION. IF THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS CONCERNED OR PERCEIVES ANY DEFICIENCIES IN THE PLANT SELECTIONS, SOIL CONDITIONS OR ANY OTHER SITE CONDITION WHICH MIGHT NEGATIVELY AFFECT PLANT ESTABLISHMENT, SURVIVAL OR GUARANTEE, HE MUST BRING THESE DEFICIENCIES TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO PROCUREMENT AND/OR INSTALLATION. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A WRITTEN REQUEST FOR THE OWNER ACCEPTANCE INSPECTION OF ALL LANDSCAPE AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ON-GOING MAINTENANCE OF ALL NEWLY INSTALLED MATERIALS UNTIL TIME OF OWNER ACCEPTANCE. ANY ACTS OF VANDALISM OR DAMAGE WHICH MAY OCCUR PRIOR TO OWNER ACCEPTANCE SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH A MAINTENANCE PROGRAM INCLUDING, BUT NOT NECESSARILY LIMITED TO, PRUNING, FERTILIZATION AND DISEASE/PEST CONTROL. CONTRACTOR SHALL GUARANTEE NEW PLANT MATERIAL THROUGH ONE CALENDAR YEAR FROM THE DATE OF OWNER ACCEPTANCE. WARRANTY (ONE FULL GROWING SEASON) FOR LANDSCAPE MATERIALS SHALL BEGIN ON THE DATE OF ACCEPTANCE BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AFTER THE COMPLETION OF PLANTING OF ALL LANDSCAPE MATERIALS. NO PARTIAL ACCEPTANCE WILL BE CONSIDERED. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE THE APPROPRIATE DATES FOR SPRING PLANT MATERIAL INSTALLATION AND SEED/SOD PLACEMENT IS FROM THE TIME GROUND HAS THAWED TO JUNE 15. FALL SODDING IS GENERALLY ACCEPTABLE FROM AUGUST 15 - NOVEMBER 1. FALL SEEDING FROM AUGUST 15 - SEPTEMBER 15; DORMANT SEEDING IN THE FALL SHALL NOT OCCUR PRIOR TO NOVEMBER 1. FALL CONIFEROUS PLANTING MAY OCCUR FROM AUGUST 15 - OCTOBER 1 AND DECIDUOUS PLANTING FROM THE FIRST FROST UNTIL NOVEMBER 15. PLANTING OUTSIDE THESE DATES IS NOT RECOMMENDED. ANY ADJUSTMENT MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. PROTECT ALL EXISTING OAKS ON SITE SCHEDULED TO REMAIN. IF EXISTING OAKS ARE DAMAGED IN ANY MANNER, ABOVE OR BELOW GROUND IN THE ROOT SYSTEM, AN ASPHALTIC TREE PRUNING PAINT SHOULD BE APPLIED IMMEDIATELY AFTER WOUNDING. OAKS ARE NOT TO BE PRUNED, REMOVED OR TRANSPLANTED BETWEEN APRIL 15 AND JULY 1. NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IF THESE DATES ARE UNAVOIDABLE. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL ESTABLISH TO HIS SATISFACTION THAT SOIL AND COMPACTION CONDITIONS ARE ADEQUATE TO ALLOW FOR PROPER DRAINAGE AT AND AROUND THE BUILDING SITE. IRRIGATION NOTES: VERIFY EXISTING/PROPOSED IRRIGATION SYSTEM LAYOUT AND CONFIRM COMPLETE LIMITS OF IRRIGATION PRIOR TO SUPPLYING SHOP DRAWINGS. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AN IRRIGATION LAYOUT PLAN AND SPECIFICATION AS A PART OF THE SCOPE OF WORK WHEN BIDDING. THESE SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO ORDER AND/OR INSTALLATION. IT SHALL BE THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO INSURE THAT ALL SODDED/SEEDED AND PLANTED AREAS ARE IRRIGATED PROPERLY, INCLUDING THOSE AREAS DIRECTLY AROUND AND ABUTTING BUILDING FOUNDATION. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH AN IRRIGATION SCHEDULE APPROPRIATE TO THE PROJECT SITE CONDITIONS AND TO PLANT MATERIAL GROWTH REQUIREMENTS. IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS NOT TO SPRINKLE ACROSS PAVEMENT. THE SYSTEM SHALL INCORPORATE A RAIN SENSOR INTO IRRIGATION SYSTEM. PLANTINGS OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF IRRIGATION ARE TO BE WATERED REGULARLY UNTIL PLANTING/SOD/SEED HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. N Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Timothy J. Fedie - LA 48303 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. 07/15/16 15186A MJS TJF TJF LANDSCAPE PLAN L1.1 PLANT SCHEDULE: LANDSCAPE PLAN: LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS: 1 TREE PER UNIT (25% MUST BE DECIDUOUS AND 25% MUST BE CONIFEROUS) 6 SHRUBS PER 1,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA PROPOSED UNITS = 34 GROSS FLOOR AREA = 29,600 SF TREES REQUIRED = 34 TREES PROPOSED = 16 OVERSTORY, 15 CONIFEROUS, 9 ORNAMENTAL EXISTING TREES = 15 TOTAL TREES ON-SITE IN AFTER CONDITION= 54 SHRUBS REQUIRED = 178 SHRUBS PROPOSED = 178 TREE MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS = 129 CALIPER INCHES DECIDUOUS TREES PROPOSED = 81.5 CALIPER INCHES CONIFEROUS TREES PROPOSED = 49.5 CALIPER INCHES (8'x.415) TOTAL PROPOSED = 131 CALIPER INCHES DORA CALCULATIONS: SITE AREA = 57,339 SQ.FT. DORA REQUIRED (12% OF SITE AREA) = 6,881 SQ.FT. DORA PROPOSED = 7,015 SQ.FT. OR 12% (MARKED ON PLAN WITH HATCH) PLANTING DETAILS: SITE A City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016(Item No. 4g) Title: Second Reading Arlington Row West Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment Page 16 07/15/16 100% CD's - JPS REVIEW 07/15/16 - 100% CD'S LOUCKS W:\2015\15186.0A\CADD DATA\LANDSCAPE\_dwg Sheet Files\L2-1Plotted: 07 /15 / 2016 9:8 AM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. CADD QUALIFICATION SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL Arlington Row Apartments West Texas Ave Site A St. Louis Park, MN Melrose Company 22375 Murray Street Excelsior, MN 55331 07/10/15 CITY SUBMITTAL 08/10/15 CITY RE-SUBMITTAL 08/19/15 CITY RE-SUBMITTAL 09/08/15 CITY RE-SUBMITTAL 09/25/15 CITY RE-SUBMITTAL 10/09/15 CITY COMMENTS 12/18/15 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 01/29/16 100% DD Documents Site A 04/27/16 100% DD Documents Site A 05/27/16 HUD Review Response Items 05/27/16 100% CD's C1.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C2.1 SITE PLAN C3.1 GRADING PLAN C3.2 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C3.3 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C3.4 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C4.1 SANITARY & WATERMAIN C4.2 STORM SEWER C8.1 DETAILS C8.2 CITY DETAILS L1.1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2.1 TREE INVENTORY PLAN HUD Project # 092-35807 N Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Timothy J. Fedie - LA 48303 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. 07/15/16 15186A MJS TJF TJF TREE INVENTORY PLAN: TREE MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS: TOTAL CALIPER INCHES = 502 CALIPER INCHES TO BE REMOVED = 264 CALIPER INCHES TO BE SAVED = 238 ((264/502)-0.2) x 1.5 x 264 = 129 129 CALIPER INCHES REQUIRED FOR MITIGATION REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR QUANTITY AND LOCATION OF PROPOSED TREES. TREE INVENTORY PLAN L2.1SITE A City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016(Item No. 4g) Title: Second Reading Arlington Row West Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment Page 17 HSS STEEL TUBE GALV & PAINTED, BY SOLAR CONTRACTOR 16" CAST IN PLACE PIER WITH RUBBED FINISH AND SLOPED TOP 24" CAST IN PLACE PIER HOLD 6' BELOW FINISH GRADE CAST IN PLACE FOOTING STEEL COLUMN BOLTED TO PIER AND ENCASED IN CONCRETE 18' - 0" PARKING STALL DEPTH SEE MANUF DRAWINGSMIN 8' - 6" CLEARFROM PARKING STALL OPEN END MIN 2' - 0" SEE MANUF DRAWINGS NOTE: •ALL DIMENSION AND MEMBER SIZE SHOWN FOR DESIGN INTENT •SOLAR CANOPY INSTALLER TO PROVIDE ENGINEERED DRAWINGS •ALL EXTERIOR STEEL TO BE GALVANIZED AND PAINTED 6"FINISH GRADE - SEE CIVIL FINISH GRADE3' - 0" ABOVE TOP OF PIER SLOPE DIRECTION SHOWN TYPICAL - INSTALLER TO VERIFY AND COORDINATE FACING TO OPTIMIZE PRODUCTION EFFICIENCY 10°BOLTED CONNECTION CAR "BASH BAR" ICE / SNOW GUARD 8' - 6"1' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"1' - 6"8' - 6"0"8' - 6"8' - 6"1' - 6"8' - 6"0"8' - 6"8' - 6"1' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"1' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"1' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"9" 1 AS1.5 27' - 0"27' - 0"27' - 0"27' - 0"27' - 0"27' - 0"12' - 0"12' - 0"162' - 0" 27' - 0"27' - 0"27' - 0" 9"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"1' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"1' - 6"8' - 0"8' - 0"8' - 6" 27' - 0"27' - 0"27' - 0" 81' - 0"12' - 0"12' - 0"27' - 0"27' - 0"27' - 0"0"9"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"1' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"1' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"9" 27' - 0"27' - 0"27' - 0" 81' - 0"12' - 0"12' - 0"elness swenson graham architects 500 washington avenue south m inneapolis m innesota 55415 p. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 5 0 8 f. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 3 8 2 w w w . e s g a r c h . c o m I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or r e p ort was prepared by m e or under m y direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of M innesota Signature Typed or Printed Nam e License # D ate PROJECT NUM BER D RAW N BY CHECKED BY O RIGINAL ISSUE: R EVISIO NS KEY PLAN N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T IO N **D R A F T ** H UD PRO JECT NUM BER 6/29/2016 2:14:45 PMA S1.5 S OLAR CANOPY 2 15515 M E C hecker 7 /6/2016 A RLINGTON ROW A RLINGTON ROW S T. LO UIS PARK, M N 5 /27/2016 - 100% C D's 0 92-35807 No.Description Date 2 7/6/2016 - City PUD Am endm ent 7/6/2016 1/4" = 1'-0"AS1.5 1 Solar Canopy 1/8" = 1'-0"AS1.5 A1 Solar Canopy A - 1 1/8" = 1'-0"AS1.5 B2 Solar Canopy B - 2 1/8" = 1'-0"AS1.5 B1 Solar Canopy B - 1 2 Solar Arrays B1 3 Bays @ 27' OC (60 Panels) 5 x 13 B2 3 Bays @ 27' OC (60 Panels) 5 x 13 A1 6 Bays @ 27' OC (135 Panels) 5 x 27 12" = 1'-0"AS1.5 2 Solar Canopy City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016(Item No. 4g) Title: Second Reading Arlington Row West Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment Page 18 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016(Item No. 4g) Title: Second Reading Arlington Row West Planned Unit Development (PUD) AmendmentPage 19 Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: September 6, 2016 Consent Agenda Item: 4h EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Second Reading Arlington Row East Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to approve Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance amending Section 36-268-PUD 5 relating to Arlington Row East Planned Unit Development, and approve ordinance summary for publication. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council support the requested amendment to allow solar panel installations above carports for Arlington Row East. SUMMARY: Approval would allow for the incorporation of a 40kw solar powered electrical installation that will be constructed above carport structures located in the eastern portion of the parking lot. Arlington Row East is located at 7705 Wayzata Blvd (North of 13th Lane). The solar carport structures will add the amenity of covered parking for residents and the solar installations: Promote higher standards of site and building design. More creative and efficient use of land. Promote environmental sustainability in the development of land and building operations. Encourage the use of on-site renewable energy. The Council approved the First Reading of the Ordinance August 15, 2016. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: None VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a leader in environmental stewardship. We will increase environmental consciousness and responsibility in all areas of city business. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance Ordinance Summary Official Exhibits Prepared by: Julie Grove, Economic Development Specialist Reviewed by: Sean Walther, Planning and Zoning Supervisor Michele Schnitker, Deputy Community Development Director Approved by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4h) Page 2 Title: Second Reading Arlington Row East Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment ORDINANCE NO. ____ - 16 ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 36-268-PUD 5 RELATING TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7705 WAYZATA BOULEVARD THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK DOES ORDAIN: Findings Sec. 1. The City Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission (Case No. 16-02-S and 16-03-PUD). Sec. 2. The Comprehensive Plan designates this property as RM-Medium Density Residential. Sec. 3. The City Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission (Case No. 16-32-PUD) for amending Ordinance Section 36-268-PUD 5 to allow solar panel installations above carports in the parking lot. Sec. 4. The St. Louis Park Ordinance Code, Section 36-268-PUD 5 is hereby amended by adding underscored language. Section breaks are represented by ***. *** (a) Development Plan *** 23. Solar Canopy Details 24. Solar Study *** (c) Accessory Uses *** (6) Solar panels as regulated by this Chapter. a. Rooftop or building mounted systems 1. Roof or building mounted solar systems shall not exceed the maximum allowed height in the PUD zoning district. b. Ground or accessory structure mounted solar systems City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4h) Page 3 Title: Second Reading Arlington Row East Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment 1. The height of a ground or accessory structure mounted solar system, measured when oriented at maximum design tilt, shall not exceed 15 feet. 2. Ground or accessory structure mounted solar systems shall have a minimum setback of 8 feet from the north property line, 5 feet from the east property line, 46 feet from the south property line and shall be subject to the principal building setbacks along west property line. Sec. 5. The contents of Planning Case File 16-32-PUD are hereby entered into and made part of the public hearing record and the record of decision for this case. Sec. 6. This Ordinance shall take effect fifteen days after its publication. Public Hearing August 3, 2016 First Reading August 15, 2016 Second Reading September 6, 2016 Date of Publication September 15, 2016 Date Ordinance takes effect September 30, 2016 Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council September 6, 2016 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4h) Page 4 Title: Second Reading Arlington Row East Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment SUMMARY FOR PUBLICATION ORDINANCE NO.____-16 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICT 7705 WAYZATA BOULEVARD This ordinance states that Section 36-268-PUD 5 shall be amended to allow solar panel installations above carports in the parking lot for property located at 7705 Wayzata Boulevard. This ordinance shall take effect 15 days after publication. Adopted by the City Council September 6, 2016 Jake Spano /s/ Mayor A copy of the full text of this ordinance is available for inspection with the City Clerk. 112' - 6 1/4"349' - 7 1/4" TRUE NORTH PARKING COUNT REQUIRED 1/BEDROOM 0 STREET 2 ACCESSIBLE 41 STANDARD/COMPACT TOTAL 43 STALLS 116' - 1 1/2"18' - 6"87' - 5 1/2"17' - 0"122' - 0 1/2" 2 BED 1A 1/A8.2 COMMON - ACCESIBLE BIKE STOR. / SERVICEBIKESTORAGEACCESIBLELOBBY - LOBBY BIKE RACKS TREES / LANDSCAPING SHOWN FOR REF SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS TO LAYOUT AND SPECIES RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY GARDEN PLOTS AND LANDSCAPING - SEE LANDSCAPE DESIGN TRASH / RECYCLE BIKE RACKS (4) MASONRY WALLS RESIDENTE ACCESS GATE BIKE RACKS (6)BACK OF CURB6' - 0" FROM6' - 0" SIDEWALKENTRY VESTIBULEMAIL ADJACENT PROPERTIES FENCE TO REMAIN TIE NEW SIDE WALK INTO EXISTING SIDEWALKS AS CURRENTLY LOCATED AT SITE BOUNDRY OUTDOOR RECREATION AREA 'FRONT PORCH' WITH OPEN TRELLIS ABOVE 'BACK PORCH' WITH CANOPY ABOVE ENTRY ENTRY ADJACENT PROPERTY CURB CUT w/ ACCESSIBLE ACCESS RAMP MODIFY EXISTING CURB CUT w/ ACCESSIBLE ACCESS RAMP CURB CUT w/ ACCESSIBLE ACCESS RAMP EXISTING UTILITY LINE - VERIFY ADJACENT PROPERTIES FENCE TO REMAIN ADJACENT PROPERTY RETAINING WALL ALONG NORTH BOUNDARY ILLUMINATED PROPERTY SIGNAGE TBD MOUNTED TO TOP AND/OR FACE OF RETAININGS WALL INFILL ALL EXISTING CURB CUTS NOT USED LINK STORM WATER RETENTION BELOW GRADE SEE CIVIL BIKESTORAGE(25)10' - 0" BLDG SETBACK5' - 0"5' - 0"5' - 0" +/- 23' - 9 1/2"50' - 0" ROW - SEE CIVILSERVICE ACCESS BIKE RACKS (6) BIKE RACKS (4) BIKE PARKING COUNT REQURIED 1/DWELLING UNIT - 27 1/10 PARKING STALLS - 4 Total Required - 31 PROVIDED 25 INTERIOR 26 EXTERIOR / SITE TOTAL 51 STALLS 8' - 6" 0" B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 B13 B14 B19 B21 B22 B24 B40 B39 B38 B37 B36 B35 B15 B16 B17 B18 B41B42B43 B28 B29 B30 B31 B32 B33 B34B27B26B25 RETAINING WALL ALONG EAST BOUNDARY SEE CIVIL GRADING FOR EXTENT AND HEIGHTS 59' - 6"24' - 0"99' - 0" B23 PROPERTY LINE(S) COLLECTION TRUCK STOP PLANTER WITH BUILDING ADDRESS / SIGN SLOPESLOPECOMMUNITY ROOM18' - 0"SIDEWALK 10' - 0" EASEMENT25' - 0 1/2"10' - 0"4' - 0"12' - 8"B4 AS1.4 B3 AS1.4 B1 AS1.4 TYPE A UNIT - REF BUILDING PLANS FOR INTERIOR LAYOUT **ONE "TYPE A" IS REQUIRED & ONE "TYPE A" IS PROVIDED AS1.5 B2 AS1.5 B1 2 GENERAL NOTES: •SEE CIVIL SITE PLAN FOR UTILITY EXISTING LOCATION •INDOOR BIKE PARKING IS LOCATED IN EASTERN BUILDING WING AND WILL BE ACCESSIBLE TO ALL RESIDENTS •5 SPACES (10% OF REQUIRED) TO BE SIGNED FOR VISITOR PARKING •12% (4,796 SF) OF SITE TO BE 'DESIGNED OUTDOOR RECREATION AREA' DORA - SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR CALCULATION - 5690SF PROPOSED elness swenson graham architects 500 washington avenue south m inneapolis m innesota 55415 p. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 5 0 8 f. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 3 8 2 w w w . e s g a r c h . c o m I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or r e p ort was prepared by m e or under m y direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of M innesota Signature Typed or Printed Nam e License # D ate PROJECT NUM BER D RAW N BY CHECKED BY O RIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIO NS KE Y PLAN N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T IO N **D R A F T ** H UD PRO JECT NUM BER 6/29/2016 2:14:44 PMAS1.3 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN - SITE B - "13TH LANE" 215515 M E ESG 2/25/2016 ARLINGTON ROW ARLINGTON ROW ST. LO UIS PARK, M N 5/27/2016 - 100% CD's B 092-35807 1/16" = 1'-0"AS1.3 1 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN PARKING COUNT - 13TH SITE 13TH Site A ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL 2 C1 COMPACT 8'6" X 16'0"4 C2 COMPACT 8'0" X 18'0"5 S1 STANDARD 8'6" X 18'0" 32 43 UNIT MATRIX - SITE B - 13TH LANE Count Unit Type Name SF Unit (Paint to Paint) "HUD Net Rentabl e" Gross Unit Rentable (Per Unit) Total Gross Unit Rentable (=Rentable * Count) Bed rooms Total Beds 3 LEVEL 1 1 1A 2 BED 797 SF 882 SF 882 SF 2 2 1 1A 2 BED 786 SF 863 SF 863 SF 2 2 2 1B 2 BED (2 STORY) 956 SF 1,098 SF 2,196 SF 2 4 2 1C 1 BED 545 SF 545 SF 1,091 SF 1 2 1 1C 1 BED 545 SF 545 SF 545 SF 1 1 2 1D 2 BED (2 STORY) 950 SF 1,091 SF 2,182 SF 2 4 1 1E 2 BED 910 SF 979 SF 979 SF 2 2 1 1E 2 BED 910 SF 979 SF 979 SF 2 2 1 1F 2 BED 744 SF 811 SF 811 SF 2 2 12 10,528 SF 21 LEVEL 2 3 2A 2 BED (2 STORY) 1,000 SF 1,123 SF 3,369 SF 2 6 2 2B 2 BED (2 STORY) 1,029 SF 1,168 SF 2,336 SF 2 4 6 2C 1 BED (2 STORY) 672 SF 753 SF 4,518 SF 1 6 2 2D 2 BED (2 STORY) 1,029 SF 1,168 SF 2,336 SF 2 4 2 2E 1 BED (2 STORY) 763 SF 851 SF 1,702 SF 1 2 15 14,261 SF 22 27 24,789 SF 43 27 24,789 SF 43 TOTAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS - 27 BUILDING FOOTPRINT(S) - 10,150 SF BUILDING GROSS SF - 28,088 SF SITE AREA - .92 ACRE (39967SF) DENSITY - 29.3 UNITS / ACRE PLAN NORTH 0 168 32 No .Description Date B 4/22/2016 - 100% DD D OCUM ENTS SITE B 4/22/2016 C 4/27/2016 - 85% CD / HUD Subm ittal - Response 4/27/2016 1 5/27/2016 - HUD Review Response Item s 5/27/2016 2 7/6/2016 - City PUD Am endm ent 7/6/2016 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4h) Title: Second Reading Arlington Row East Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment Page 5 Sheet No.: Project No.: Sheet Title: Quality Control: Checked By: Project Lead:Drawn By: Review Date: Professional Signature: by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing or for completion of this project by others without written approval shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files are instruments of the Consultant professional services CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project CADD Qualification: Professional Services: Project Name: Owner/Developer:W:\2015\15186\CADD DATA\SURVEYPlotted: 05 /10 / 2016 7:51 AMVicinity Map: Revisions: Landscape Architecture Environmental Planning Civil Engineering Land Surveying 2016 7200 Hemlock Lane - Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 Telephone: (763) 424-5505 www.LoucksAssociates.com St. Louis Park, Minnesota 22375 Murray Street Excelsior, Minnesota 55331 Sheet 1 of 1 (13th Lane Site) --MJA RLL Revisions: S15186-MASTER.DWG/EAST 05-29-15 05-09-16 Drawing Submitted UPDATE TO 2016 AND HUD REPORT Paul J. McGinley - PLS 16099 License No.Date I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Vicinity Map: DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED (Parcels 1 - 7 described in Schedule A of the herein referenced Title Commitment) Parcel 1 That part of Lot 2, Block 1, Penn-Zayta, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, the title thereto being registered; lying southerly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the west line of said Lot 2, distant 112.56 feet northerly of the southwest corner thereof; thence easterly to a point on the east line of said Lot 2, distant 113.07 feet northerly of the southeast corner thereof and there terminating; Parcel 2 That part of Lot 3, Block 1, Penn-Zayta, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, the title thereto being registered; lying southerly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the west line of said Lot 3, distant 113.07 feet northerly of the southwest corner thereof; thence easterly to a point on the east line of said Lot 3, distant 113.58 feet northerly of the southeast corner thereof and there terminating; Parcel 3 That part of Lot 4, Block 1, Penn-Zayta , according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, the title thereto being registered; lying southerly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the west line of said Lot 4, distant 113.58 feet northerly of the southwest corner thereof; thence easterly to a point on the east line of said Lot 4, distant 114.09 feet northerly of the southeast corner thereof and there terminating; Parcel 4 That part of Lot 5, Block 1, Penn-Zayta, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, the title thereto being registered ; lying southerly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the west line of said Lot 5, distant 114.09 feet northerly of the southwest corner thereof ; thence easterly to a point on the east line of said Lot 5, distant 114.60 feet northerly of the southeast corner thereof and there terminating; Parcel 5 That part of Lot 6, Block 1, Penn-Zayta, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County , Minnesota, the title thereto being registered; lying southerly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the west line of said Lot 6, distant 114.60 feet northerly of the southwest corner thereof; thence easterly to a point on the east line of said Lot 6, distant 115.11 feet northerly of the southeast corner thereof and there terminating; Parcel 6 That part of Lot 7, Block 1, Penn-Zayta , according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County , Minnesota , the title  thereto being registered; lying southerly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the west line of said Lot 7, distant 115.11 feet northerly of the southwest corner thereof ; thence easterly to a point on the east line of said Lot 7, distant 115.62 feet northerly of the southeast corner thereof and there terminating; Parcel 7 That part of Lot 8, Block 1, Penn-Zayta, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, the title thereto being registered ; lying southerly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the west line of said Lot 8, distant 115.62 feet northerly of the southwest corner thereof; thence easterly to a point on the east line of said Lot 8, distant 116.13 feet northerly of the southeast corner thereof and there terminating. Torrens Property - Certificate of Title No. 1407232 TITLE COMMITMENT EXCEPTIONS (Per Schedule B, Part II of the herein referenced Title Commitment) The property depicted on this survey and the easements of record shown hereon are Parcels 1 - 7 and the easements described in the Commitment for Title Insurance issued by Old Republic National Title Insurance Company, File No. ORTE743057, dated March 16, 2016. 1 - 7 do not require comment. ALTA/NSPS OPTIONAL TABLE A NOTES (The following items refer to Table A optional survey responsibilities and specifications) 1. Monuments placed (or a reference monument or witness to the corner) at all major corners of the boundary of the property, unless already marked or referenced by existing monuments or witnesses to the corner are shown hereon. 2. The address, if disclosed in documents provided to or obtained by the surveyor, or observed while conducting the fieldwork, is unassigned. 3. This property is contained in Zone X (areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain) per Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel No. 27053C0332E, effective date of September 2, 2004. 4. The Gross land area is 39,977 +/- square feet or 0.92 +/- acres. 6. (a) The current Zoning for the subject property is R-3 (Two-Family residence) per the City of St. Louis Park's zoning map dated February 2, 2015. The setback, height, and floor space area restrictions for said zoning designation were obtained from a table laid out in section 11.60 Sub 14 of the Zoning Ordinance found on their web site or in their published ordinance on the aforementioned date and are as follows: SETBACKS (single) - Front 25 feet, Side 7 and 5 feet, Rear 25 feet; SETBACKS (duplex) - Front 25 feet, Side 9 and 6 feet, Rear 25 feet; HEIGHT - three (3) stories or thirty-five (350) feet, whichever is lesser; FLOOR AREA RATIO - Lot coverage shall not exceed twenty-five (25) percent of lot area. (b) We have not received the current zoning classification and building setback requirements from the client. 7. (a) There are no visible buildings on this site. 8. Substantial features observed in the process of conducting fieldwork, are shown hereon. 9. There are no striped parking stalls on this site. 10. (a)&(b) There are no observable buildings on this site, therefore these items do not apply. 11. We have shown underground utilities on and/or serving the surveyed property per Gopher State One-Call Ticket No's 151250543 & 151250534. The following utilities and municipalities were notified: CENTER POINT ENERGY (800) 778-9140 CENTER POINT ENERGY (406) 541-9571 CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY (763) 593-8030 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK (952) 924-2562 COMCAST (612) 522-8141 DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION (951) 366-5750 SPRINT/LONG DISTANCE (800) 521-0579 WINDSTREAM COMM.(763) 682-3514 XCEL ENERGY (800) 848-7558 CENTURYLINK (855) 742-6062 i. Utility operators do not consistently respond to locate requests through the Gopher State One Call service for surveying purposes such as this. Those utility operators that do respond, often will not locate utilities from their main line to the customer's structure or facility. They consider those utilities ßSULYDWHà installations that are outside their jurisdiction. These ßSULYDWHà utilities on the surveyed property or adjoining properties, may not be located since most operators will not mark such "private" utilities. A private utility locator may be contacted to investigate these utilities further, if requested by the client. ii. The locations of underground utility lines shown hereon is an approximation based on available maps, unless otherwise noted on the survey. iii. Maps provided by those notified above, either along with a field location or in lieu of such a location, are very often inaccurate or inconclusive. EXTREME CAUTION MUST BE EXERCISED BEFORE AN EXCAVATION TAKES PLACE ON OR NEAR THIS SITE. BEFORE DIGGING, YOU ARE REQUIRED BY LAW TO NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE AT 811 or (651) 454-0002. 12. Governmental Agency survey-related requirements as specified by the client: HUD Surveyor's Report attached. 13. The names of the adjoining owners, as shown hereon, are based on information obtained from current tax records. 16. We are not aware of any evidence of recent earth moving work, building construction or building additions observed in the process of conducting our field work. 17. We are not aware of any proposed changes in street right of way lines or evidence of recent street or sidewalk construction or repairs observed in the process of conducting our field work. 18. We have not been provided with any information on wetland delineation markers, as determined by a qualified specialist. 19. We are not aware of any plottable offsite (i.e., appurtenant) easements or servitudes for this site. SURVEY REPORT 1) The Surveyor was not provided utility easement documents for the subject property except for those shown on the Survey. 2) Along the West side of the site, the neighboring fence lies partially on the subject property as shown hereon. 3) The bearings for this survey are based on the Hennepin County Coordinate System NAD 83 (1986 Adjust). 4) Snow and ice conditions during winter months may obscure otherwise visible evidence of on site improvements and/or utilities. CERTIFICATION To Department of Housing and Urban Development; Dougherty Mortgage, LLC; Arlington Row LLC; Melrose Company, LLC; and Old Republic National Title Insurance Company: This is to certify that this map or plat and the survey on which it is based were made in accordance with the 2016 Minimum Standard Detail Requirements for ALTA/NSPS Land Title Surveys, jointly established and adopted by ALTA and NSPS, and includes Items 1 - 4, 6(a), 6(b), 7(a), 8, 9, 10(a), 10(b), 11, 12, 13, 16, 17, 18 and 19 of Table A thereof. The field work was completed on April 7, 2016. Date of Plat or Map: May 9, 2016 ______________________________________________ Paul J. McGinley, PLS Minnesota License No. 16099 pmcginley@loucksinc.com SCALE IN FEET 0 30 N SITE B 4-8-15 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4h) Title: Second Reading Arlington Row East Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment Page 6 07/15/16 - 100% CD'S LOUCKS W:\2015\15186.0A\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\EAST SITE\C1-1 EXISTINGPlotted: 07 /15 / 2016 9:22 AM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. CADD QUALIFICATION SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL Arlington Row Apartments East St. Louis Park, MN Melrose Company 22375 Murray Street Excelsior, MN 55331 12/03/15 CITY SUBMITTAL 03/18/16 Watershed Resubmittal 04/27/16 85%CD / HUD Submittal 05/27/16 HUD Review Response Items 05/27/16 100% CD's 07/06/16 City PUD Amendment 07/15/16 100 % CD'S - JPS REVIEW C1.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C2.1 SITE PLAN C3.1 GRADING PLAN C3.2 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C3.3 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C3.4 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C4.1 SANITARY & WATERMAIN C4.2 STORM SEWER C8.1 DETAILS C8.2 CITY DETAILS L1.1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2.1 TREE INVENTORY PLAN HUD Project # 092-35807 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. PJ Disch - PE 49933 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. 07/15/2016 15186A PJD PJD PJD N WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. EXISTING CONDITIONS C1.1 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. PJ Disch - PE 49933 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. 07/10/2015 15186A PJD PJD PJD SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 SITE B City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4h) Title: Second Reading Arlington Row East Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment Page 7 (25) INTERIOR BIKE STORAGE (4) BIKE STALLS (6) BIKE STALLS (6) BIKE STALLS (4) BIKE STALLS (6) BIKE STALLS TRASH & RECYCLE ENCLOSURE W/CONCRETE PAVEMENT WITH MASONRY WALLS TO MATCH BUILDING. SEE ARCHITECTURAL MODULAR RETAINING WALL WITH 36" FENCE FOR SCREENING 2 STAIRS SEE ARCHITECTURAL CONCRETE SIDEWALK TYP. 2 STAIRS SEE ARCHITECTURAL (8) CONCRETE PATIOS WITH SCREEN WALL. SEE ARCHITECTURAL BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT 18.0 24.0 8.5 8.0 8.0 8.0 22.0 18.0 24.0 16.0 8.5 8.5 8.5 6.0 6.0 8.0 (3) COMPACT STALLS 8'x16' REMOVE (7) EXISTING CONCRETE APRONS. REPLACE WITH CONCRETE CURB TO MATCH CURB IN 13TH LANE CONCRETE SIDEWALK TYP. OUTDOOR RECREATIONAL AREA RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY GARDEN SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN1 STAIR 2 STAIRS 2 STAIRS (1) COMPACT STALL 8.5'x16' COMPACT STALL SIGN COMPACT STALL SIGN ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL SIGN 3.7 1 STAIRS ADA COMPLIANT SIDEWALK AT 5% OR LESS WITH MODULAR WALL ON WEST SIDE AND BACK OF CURB EXPOSED ON EAST SIDE. PEDESTRIAN RAMP PEDESTRIAN RAMP PEDESTRIAN RAMP PEDESTRIAN RAMP PEDESTRIAN RAMP 59.557.2 3.3 1.3 3.3 13.3 BUILDING SETBACK 6' TALL CEDAR FENCE ON TOP OF RETAINING WALL 6' TALL CEDAR FENCE NO PARKING STRIPING FOR LOADING ZONE NO PARKING LOADING ZONE SIGN NO PARKING LOADING ZONE SIGN 18.5 10.0 STOP SIGN CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY EXACT LOCATION OF VAULT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION RETAINING WALL 5.7 3.3 5.7 3.3 10.0 10.0 5.0 4.0 5.5 8.6 9.5 11.9 3.0 R312.8 R3.0R3.0 R4.0 R4.0 R2.5 R2.0 R8.0 R8.0 (2) COMPACT STALLS 8'x18' COMPACT STALL SIGN SOLAR CANOPY COLUMN. COORDINATE FOOTING LOCATION WITH CURB & GUTTER. 18.0 (3) COMPACT STALLS 8'x18' 5.0 10.0 07/15/16 - 100% CD'S LOUCKS W:\2015\15186.0A\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\EAST SITE\C2-1 SITE PLANPlotted: 07 /15 / 2016 9:22 AM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. CADD QUALIFICATION SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL Arlington Row Apartments East St. Louis Park, MN Melrose Company 22375 Murray Street Excelsior, MN 55331 12/03/15 CITY SUBMITTAL 03/18/16 Watershed Resubmittal 04/27/16 85%CD / HUD Submittal 05/27/16 HUD Review Response Items 05/27/16 100% CD's 07/06/16 City PUD Amendment 07/15/16 100 % CD'S - JPS REVIEW C1.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C2.1 SITE PLAN C3.1 GRADING PLAN C3.2 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C3.3 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C3.4 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C4.1 SANITARY & WATERMAIN C4.2 STORM SEWER C8.1 DETAILS C8.2 CITY DETAILS L1.1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2.1 TREE INVENTORY PLAN HUD Project # 092-35807 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. PJ Disch - PE 49933 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. 07/15/2016 15186A PJD PJD PJD N WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. SITE PLAN GENERAL NOTES 1.MINIMUM SETBACKS: FRONT BUILDING SETBACK = 25 FT SIDE BUILDING SETBACK = 10 FT. REAR BUILDING SETBACK = 0 FT. 2.ZONING EXISTING ZONING =R-3 PROPOSED ZONING = PUD 3. PARKING SUMMARY BIKE COUNT SUMMARY SURFACE REGULAR STALLS = 41 1 PER DWELLING = 27 SURFACE HANDICAPPED STALLS = 2 1 PER 10 PARKING STALLS = 5 TOTAL SURFACE STALLS = 43 TOTAL REQUIRED = 32 BIKE STALLS INSIDE = 25 BIKE STALLS OUTSIDE = 26 TOTAL PROPOSED = 51 4. AREA/DENSITY TOTAL AREA = 39,977 SQ.FT. OR 0.918 AC. IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA = 30,795 SQ.FT. OR 0.707 AC. = 77.0% PERVIOUS SURFACE AREA = 9,182 SQ.FT. OR 0.211 AC. =23.0% 5. ALL PAVING, CONCRETE CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DETAILS SHOWN PER SHEET C8-1 AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. SEE LANDSCAPE AND ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR ANY ADDITIONAL HARDSCAPE APPLICATIONS. 6. THE CITY AND THE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY WORK WITHIN THE STREET RIGHT OF WAY (SIDEWALK, STREET OR DRIVEWAYS) 7. MINNESOTA STATE STATUTE REQUIRES NOTIFICATION PER "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY GRADING, EXCAVATION OR UNDERGROUND WORK. 8. SEE CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS FOR ANY REMOVAL DETAILS. 9. ANY SIGN OR FIXTURES REMOVED WITH IN THE RIGHT OF WAY OR AS PART OF THE SITE WORK SHALL BE REPLACED BY THE CONTRACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY REQUIREMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PRESERVE AND MAINTAIN ANY EXISTING STREET LIGHTS AND TRAFFIC SIGNS PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. 10. CLEAR AND GRUB AND REMOVE ALL TREES, VEGETATION AND SITE DEBRIS PRIOR TO GRADING. ALL REMOVED MATERIAL SHALL BE HAULED FROM THE SITE DAILY. ALL CLEARING AND GRUBBING AND REMOVALS SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY ESTABLISHED UPON REMOVAL. (SEE SHEET C3-1) 11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO OBTAIN ALL PERMITS FROM THE CITY AS REQUIRED FOR ALL WORK WITH THE STREET AND PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. 12. A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF SITE IMPROVEMENTS NOT SHOWN ON THIS SHEET ARE DESCRIBED AND PROVIDED IN FURTHER DETAIL ON THE ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPE PLANS. THIS INCLUDES LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND OTHER FIXTURES. 13. B612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE EDGE OF ALL COMMON DRIVES AND PARKING LOTS. 14. CONSTRUCTION NOTES: A. PEDESTRIAN RAMPS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE LOCATIONS SHOWN AND AS SHOWN PER THE LANDSCAPE SITE PLANS. B. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SAW-CUT BITUMINOUS AND CONCRETE PAVEMENTS AS REQUIRED PER THE SPECIFICATIONS. REMOVE EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER AND INSTALL B618 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER. 15. SEE SHEETS C3-1 AND C4-1 FOR GRADING AND UTILITIES. 16. ALL CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER B612, CITY'S STANDARD PLATES. (SEE DETAIL SHEET). 17. THE INTENT OF THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION IS TO PRESERVE AS MUCH OF THE EXISTING STREET PAVEMENT AS POSSIBLE, AND TO MILL AND OVERLAY. REMOVED PAVEMENT AREAS AND PATCHING SHALL BE INSTALLED PER PAVEMENT SECTION PROVIDED PER DETAIL SHEET. PAVEMENT LEGEND: CONCRETE PAVEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK SITE PLAN C2.1 SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 SITE B City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4h) Title: Second Reading Arlington Row East Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment Page 8 TW=915.00 BW=915.00 TW=914.60 BW=909.00 TW=914.60 BW=904.50 TW=915.00 BW=905.80 TW=915.00 BW=906.20 TW=913.00 BW=913.00 TW=915.00 BW=907.00 TW=915.00 BW=907.00 TC=914.00 TSW=913.00 TC=914.90 TSW=913.90 TC=912.00 TSW=912.00 TW=912.00 BW=912.00 TW=915.50 BW=913.00 TW=916.20 BW=914.00 TW=916.20 BW=915.00 TW=915.90 BW=915.90 07/15/16 - 100% CD'S LOUCKS W:\2015\15186.0A\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\EAST SITE\C3-1 GRADINGPlotted: 07 /15 / 2016 9:23 AM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. CADD QUALIFICATION SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL Arlington Row Apartments East St. Louis Park, MN Melrose Company 22375 Murray Street Excelsior, MN 55331 12/03/15 CITY SUBMITTAL 03/18/16 Watershed Resubmittal 04/27/16 85%CD / HUD Submittal 05/27/16 HUD Review Response Items 05/27/16 100% CD's 07/06/16 City PUD Amendment 07/15/16 100 % CD'S - JPS REVIEW C1.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C2.1 SITE PLAN C3.1 GRADING PLAN C3.2 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C3.3 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C3.4 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C4.1 SANITARY & WATERMAIN C4.2 STORM SEWER C8.1 DETAILS C8.2 CITY DETAILS L1.1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2.1 TREE INVENTORY PLAN HUD Project # 092-35807 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. PJ Disch - PE 49933 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. 07/15/2016 15186A PJD PJD PJD N WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. GRADING PLAN C3.1 SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1. SPOT ELEVATIONS REPRESENT FINISHED SURFACE GRADES, GUTTER/FLOW LINE, FACE OF BUILDING, OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2. CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.16 FEET. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON PLANS DO NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS. 3. GRADING OF THE INFILTRATION AREAS SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED USING LOW-IMPACT EARTH-MOVING EQUIPMENT TO PREVENT COMPACTION OF THE UNDERLYING SOILS. SMALL TRACKED DOZERS AND BOBCATS WITH RUNNER TRACKS ARE RECOMMENDED. 4. ALL DISTURBED UNPAVED AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE MINIMUM OF 6 INCHES OF TOP SOIL AND SEED/MULCH OR SOD. THESE AREAS SHALL BE WATERED/MAINTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR UNTIL VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED. 5. FOR SITE RETAINING WALLS "TW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT TOP FACE OF WALL (NOT TOP OF WALL), "TC" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT TOP OF CURB, "TSW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT TOP OF SIDEWALK AND "BW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT BOTTOM FACE OF WALL (NOT BOTTOM OF BURIED WALL COURSES). 6. REFER TO THE REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION AND REVIEW (REPORT NO. ________), DATED ____________ AS PREPARED BY ________________FOR AN EXISTING SUBSURFACE SITE CONDITION ANALYSIS AND CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATIONS. 7. STREETS MUST BE CLEANED AND SWEPT WHENEVER TRACKING OF SEDIMENTS OCCURS AND BEFORE SITES ARE LEFT IDLE FOR WEEKENDS AND HOLIDAYS. A REGULAR SWEEPING SCHEDULE MUST BE ESTABLISHED. 8. DUST MUST BE ADEQUATELY CONTROLLED. 9. SEE SWPPP FOR ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL NOTES AND REQUIREMENTS. 10. SEE UTILITY PLAN FOR WATER, STORM AND SANITARY SEWER INFORMATION. 11. SEE SITE PLAN FOR CURB AND BITUMINOUS TAPER LOCATIONS. 12. TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT MULCH MUST BE UNIFORMLY APPLIED BY MECHANICAL OR HYDRAULIC MEANS AND STABILIZED BY DISC-ANCHORING OR USE OF HYDRAULIC SOIL STABILIZERS. 13. TEMPORARY VEGETATIVE COVER MUST BE PROVIDED CONSISTING OF A SUITABLE, FAST-GROWING, DENSE GRASS SEED MIX SPREAD AT A MINIMUM AT THE MNDOT SPECIFIED RATE PER ACRE. IF TEMPORARY COVER IS TO REMAIN IN PLACE BEYOND THE PRESENT GROWING SEASON, TWO-THIRDS OF THE SEED MIX SHALL BE COMPOSED OF PERENNIAL GRASSES. SITE B City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4h) Title: Second Reading Arlington Row East Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment Page 9 CONCRETE WASHOUT ROCK ENTRANCE PAD INLET PROTECTION TYP 07/15/16 - 100% CD'S LOUCKS W:\2015\15186.0A\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\EAST SITE\C3-2 SWPPPPlotted: 07 /15 / 2016 9:25 AM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. CADD QUALIFICATION SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL Arlington Row Apartments East St. Louis Park, MN Melrose Company 22375 Murray Street Excelsior, MN 55331 12/03/15 CITY SUBMITTAL 03/18/16 Watershed Resubmittal 04/27/16 85%CD / HUD Submittal 05/27/16 HUD Review Response Items 05/27/16 100% CD's 07/06/16 City PUD Amendment 07/15/16 100 % CD'S - JPS REVIEW C1.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C2.1 SITE PLAN C3.1 GRADING PLAN C3.2 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C3.3 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C3.4 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C4.1 SANITARY & WATERMAIN C4.2 STORM SEWER C8.1 DETAILS C8.2 CITY DETAILS L1.1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2.1 TREE INVENTORY PLAN HUD Project # 092-35807 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. PJ Disch - PE 49933 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. 07/15/2016 15186A PJD PJD PJD NWARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C3.2 SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT INFILTRATION STORMWATER HARVEST AND REUSE FILTRATION WET SEDIMENTATION BASIN REGIONAL PONDING X ESTIMATED QUANTITIES DESCRIPTION UNIT TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EA PREFABRICATED CONCRETE WASHOUT EA SILT FENCE (STANDARD)LF INLET PROTECTION EA QUANTITY 1 1 920 1 SEEDING/SOD AC 0.25 INLET PROTECTION SWPPP LEGEND SILT FENCE EXISTING DRAINAGE PATTERN PROPOSED DRAINAGE PATTERN CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER SPECIAL WATERS SEARCH MAP SITE VICINITY MAP PROJECT LOCATION SITE B City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4h) Title: Second Reading Arlington Row East Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment Page 10 SAN INV= 907.00 CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY MAIN WITH SAN MH 1 B9=-)!% " INV=905.87 W INV=905.87 E INV=906.00 N 30 LF 6" PVC @ 3.33% 2" DOMESTIC SERVICE WITH 2" COMPOUND METER W/STRAINER & BY-PASS CITY OWNED LOCK CONNECT TO EXISTING 12" WATER MAIN WITH 6" FIRE SERVICE, 2" DOMESTIC SERVICE AND GATE VALVES PER CITY STANDARDS 6" DIP 6" FIRE SERVICE 6x6x6 TEE WITH 6" GATE VALVE & 6" DIP 2" DOMESTIC DISCONNECT (7) EXISTING SEWER STUBS AT MAIN PER CITY STANDARD. COORDINATE WITH CITY FOR EXACT LOCATION. DISCONNECT (1) EXISTING WATER STUB AT MAIN PER CITY STANDARD. COORDINATE WITH CITY FOR EXACT LOCATION. 07/15/16 - 100% CD'S LOUCKS W:\2015\15186.0A\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\EAST SITE\C4-1 SANITARY & WATERPlotted: 07 /15 / 2016 9:27 AM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. CADD QUALIFICATION SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL Arlington Row Apartments East St. Louis Park, MN Melrose Company 22375 Murray Street Excelsior, MN 55331 12/03/15 CITY SUBMITTAL 03/18/16 Watershed Resubmittal 04/27/16 85%CD / HUD Submittal 05/27/16 HUD Review Response Items 05/27/16 100% CD's 07/06/16 City PUD Amendment 07/15/16 100 % CD'S - JPS REVIEW C1.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C2.1 SITE PLAN C3.1 GRADING PLAN C3.2 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C3.3 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C3.4 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C4.1 SANITARY & WATERMAIN C4.2 STORM SEWER C8.1 DETAILS C8.2 CITY DETAILS L1.1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2.1 TREE INVENTORY PLAN HUD Project # 092-35807 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. PJ Disch - PE 49933 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. 07/15/2016 15186A PJD PJD PJD N WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. SANITARY & WATERMAIN C4.1 UTILITY PLAN GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND WATERMAIN UTILITIES SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPECIFICATIONS, THE CITY AND THE STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATION OF THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM), 1999 EDITION. ALL HDPE CONNECTIONS TO CONCRETE MANHOLES SHALL BE CONNECTED WITH AN INTERNAL RUBBER GASKET OR BY USING ADS WATERSTOP GASKET. ALL SANITARY SEWER MAIN LINE SHALL BE SDR 35. ALL SANITARY SEWER SERVICES SHALL BE SDR 26. 2. SEE SHEET C8-1 AND THE CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS FOR SPECIFIC UTILITY DETAILS AND UTILITY SERVICE DETAILS. 3. ALL UTILITY PIPE BEDDING SHALL BE COMPACTED SAND OR FINE GRANULAR MATERIAL PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. ALL COMPACTION SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CEAM SPECIFICATION. 4. ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. THE CITY DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING AND BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT AND THE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER MUST BE NOTIFIED AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY WORK WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, OR WORK IMPACTING PUBLIC UTILITIES. 5. ALL SANITARY SEWER AND WATER SERVICES SHALL TERMINATE AT THE PROPERTY LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO PERFORMING ANY EXCAVATION OR UNDERGROUND WORK. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD ADJUST WATERMAIN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER, AND SERVICES AS REQUIRED. INSULATION OF WATER AND SANITARY SEWER LINES SHALL BE PROVIDED WHERE 7.5 FEET MINIMUM DEPTH CAN NOT BE ATTAINED. 8. ALL STREET REPAIRS AND PATCHING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE ALL SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED AUTHORITY OF OF THE CITY. 9. ALL NEW WATERMAIN MUST HAVE A MINIMUM OF 7.5 FEET OF COVER. 10. ADJUST ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES, BOTH PUBLIC AND PRIVATE TO THE PROPOSED GRADES WHERE DISTURBED AND COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE UTILITY OWNERS. STRUCTURES BEING RESET TO PAVED AREAS MUST MEET OWNERS REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC LOADING. 11. PROPOSED PIPE MATERIALS: WATERMAIN DIP CLASS 52 NO LESS THAN 7.5' DEEP. SANITARY SEWER PVC SDR 35 NO MORE THAN 20' DEEP. SANITARY SEWER PVC SDR26 20' - 25' DEEP. STORM SEWER RCP CLASS 5 12" TO 18" DIAMETER. DRAINTILE POLYETHYLENE SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 SITE B City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4h) Title: Second Reading Arlington Row East Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment Page 11 CBMH 1 RIM=913.50 INV=909.50 SUMP=906.50 109 LF - 15" STORM @ 1.00% CBMH 2 RIM=914.10 INV=908.41 SUMP=905.41 59 LF - 15" STORM @ 2.39% 72" STORM VAULT 110' - 72" PERFORATED CMP @ 0.00% INV=902.50 ROCK INV=902.00 SAND INV=900.00 4" DRAINTILE INV=900.00 SEE DETAIL ON C8-1 42" ACCESS MH 13 RIM=914.30 SEE DETAIL ON C8-1 CBMH 3 RIM=913.40 INV=908.00 SUMP=905.00 15" INV 907.00 32 LF - 15" STORM @ 3.13% CBMH 4 RIM=915.30 INV=911.30 CBMH 5 RIM=915.20 INV=910.91 CBMH 6 RIM=915.20 INV=910.30 CBMH 7 RIM=914.80 INV=909.99 CBMH 8 RIM=915.20 INV=909.52 W INV=909.32 E CBMH 9 RIM=913.50 INV=909.50 STMH 10 RIM=914.60 INV=908.89 W INV=909.09 E INV=908.89 N 39 LF - 12" PVC @ 1.00% 61 LF - 12" PVC @ 1.00%31 LF - 12" PVC @ 1.00% 47 LF - 12" PVC @ 1.00% 43 LF - 15" PVC @ 1.00% 81 LF - 15" STORM @ 2.33% 44 LF - 12" PVC @ 0.93% 10 LF - 8" PVC @ 2.00% STMH 11 RIM=914.45 INV=906.90 S (8") INV=900.00 S (4") INV=900.00 N (12") 28 LF - 12" STORM @ 2.00% CORE DRILL 12" STORM PIPE INTO EXISTING CB AT INV=899.44. VERIFY DEPTH OF 6" STEEL GAS LINE BEFORE CORE DRILL. LOWER INVERT AS NEEDED IF GAS LINE IS IN COONFLICT 07/15/16 - 100% CD'S LOUCKS W:\2015\15186.0A\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\EAST SITE\C4-2 STORMPlotted: 07 /15 / 2016 9:27 AM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. CADD QUALIFICATION SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL Arlington Row Apartments East St. Louis Park, MN Melrose Company 22375 Murray Street Excelsior, MN 55331 12/03/15 CITY SUBMITTAL 03/18/16 Watershed Resubmittal 04/27/16 85%CD / HUD Submittal 05/27/16 HUD Review Response Items 05/27/16 100% CD's 07/06/16 City PUD Amendment 07/15/16 100 % CD'S - JPS REVIEW C1.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C2.1 SITE PLAN C3.1 GRADING PLAN C3.2 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C3.3 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C3.4 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C4.1 SANITARY & WATERMAIN C4.2 STORM SEWER C8.1 DETAILS C8.2 CITY DETAILS L1.1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2.1 TREE INVENTORY PLAN HUD Project # 092-35807 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. PJ Disch - PE 49933 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. 07/15/2016 15186A PJD PJD PJD N WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. STORM SEWER C4.2 UTILITY PLAN GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND WATERMAIN UTILITIES SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPECIFICATIONS, THE CITY AND THE STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATION OF THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM), 1999 EDITION. ALL HDPE CONNECTIONS TO CONCRETE MANHOLES SHALL BE CONNECTED WITH AN INTERNAL RUBBER GASKET OR BY USING ADS WATERSTOP GASKET. ALL SANITARY SEWER MAIN LINE SHALL BE SDR 35. ALL SANITARY SEWER SERVICES SHALL BE SDR 26. 2. SEE SHEET C8-1 AND THE CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS FOR SPECIFIC UTILITY DETAILS AND UTILITY SERVICE DETAILS. 3. ALL UTILITY PIPE BEDDING SHALL BE COMPACTED SAND OR FINE GRANULAR MATERIAL PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. ALL COMPACTION SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CEAM SPECIFICATION. 4. ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. THE CITY DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING AND BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT AND THE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER MUST BE NOTIFIED AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY WORK WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, OR WORK IMPACTING PUBLIC UTILITIES. 5. ALL SANITARY SEWER AND WATER SERVICES SHALL TERMINATE AT THE PROPERTY LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO PERFORMING ANY EXCAVATION OR UNDERGROUND WORK. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD ADJUST WATERMAIN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER, AND SERVICES AS REQUIRED. INSULATION OF WATER AND SANITARY SEWER LINES SHALL BE PROVIDED WHERE 7.5 FEET MINIMUM DEPTH CAN NOT BE ATTAINED. 8. ALL STREET REPAIRS AND PATCHING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE ALL SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED AUTHORITY OF OF THE CITY. 9. ALL NEW WATERMAIN MUST HAVE A MINIMUM OF 7.5 FEET OF COVER. 10. ADJUST ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES, BOTH PUBLIC AND PRIVATE TO THE PROPOSED GRADES WHERE DISTURBED AND COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE UTILITY OWNERS. STRUCTURES BEING RESET TO PAVED AREAS MUST MEET OWNERS REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC LOADING. 11. PROPOSED PIPE MATERIALS: WATERMAIN DIP CLASS 52 NO LESS THAN 7.5' DEEP. SANITARY SEWER PVC SDR 35 NO MORE THAN 20' DEEP. SANITARY SEWER PVC SDR26 20' - 25' DEEP. STORM SEWER RCP CLASS 5 12" TO 18" DIAMETER. DRAINTILE POLYETHYLENE STORM SEWER SCHEDULE STRUCTURE NO.CASTING MANHOLE SIZE CBMH 1 2'x3' PRECAST CBMH 2 48" PRECAST CBMH 3 48" PRECAST CBMH 4 NYLOPLAST CB CBMH 5 CBMH 6 R-3067 24" DOME SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 CBMH 7 CBMH 8 CBMH 9 STMH 10 STMH 11 48" PRECASTR-1648 48" PRECASTR-1648 R-3067 R-3067 NYLOPLAST CB24" DOME NYLOPLAST CB24" DOME NYLOPLAST CB24" DOME NYLOPLAST CB24" DOME NYLOPLAST CB24" DOME STMH 12 STMH 13 R-1648 42" ACCESS RISERR-1648 42" ACCESS RISER SITE B City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4h) Title: Second Reading Arlington Row East Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment Page 12 07/15/16 - 100% CD'S LOUCKS W:\2015\15186.0A\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\EAST SITE\C8-1 DETAILPlotted: 07 /15 / 2016 9:28 AM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. CADD QUALIFICATION SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL Arlington Row Apartments East St. Louis Park, MN Melrose Company 22375 Murray Street Excelsior, MN 55331 12/03/15 CITY SUBMITTAL 03/18/16 Watershed Resubmittal 04/27/16 85%CD / HUD Submittal 05/27/16 HUD Review Response Items 05/27/16 100% CD's 07/06/16 City PUD Amendment 07/15/16 100 % CD'S - JPS REVIEW C1.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C2.1 SITE PLAN C3.1 GRADING PLAN C3.2 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C3.3 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C3.4 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C4.1 SANITARY & WATERMAIN C4.2 STORM SEWER C8.1 DETAILS C8.2 CITY DETAILS L1.1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2.1 TREE INVENTORY PLAN HUD Project # 092-35807 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. PJ Disch - PE 49933 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. 07/15/2016 15186A PJD PJD PJD DETAILS C8.1 STANDARD GUTTER 8"A 6" 13.5" 1 2" RAD. 24"B624 B618 18" B612 12" CURB TYPE "A" MIN. OF 4" AGG. BASE UNDER CURB (IF TOTAL THICKNESS OF SECTION ALLOWS) 3/8 " LIP 3" RAD. 1 3 3" RAD. AGG. BASE VARIES PAVEMENT SECTION VARIES SEE PAVEMENT SECTION DETAIL SLOPE GUTTER TO MATCH PARKING LOT DRAINAGE (3/4" PER FT. TYP.) TIP GUTTER OUT DRAWN 1/2014 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 2009B6 STYLE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER MINIMUM 1' BEHIND BACK OF CURB 7" SPECIFICATION NOTES: 1. UPON COMPLETION, CURBING SHOULD BE SPRAYED WITH A MEMBRANE CURING COMPOUND PER MNDOT 3754. 2. EXPANSION JOINTS AT MAX. SPACING OF 200'. 3. CONSTRUCT IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT 2531. 2" BIT. WEAR COURSE, MN/DOT 2360 SPWEA240B TACK COAT, MN/DOT 2357 2" BIT. NON-WEAR COURSE, MN/DOT 2360 SPNWB230B 6" AGG. BASE, CLASS 5 OR 2 MN/DOT 3138 SURFACE COMPACTION FINISHED GRADE DRAWN 1/2014 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 2030BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION NOTES: 1. CONCRETE SHOULD BE REINFORCED WITH WELDED WIRE FABRIC OR REINFORCING BARS TO ASSIST IN CONTROLLING CRACKING FROM DRYING SHRINKAGE AND THERMAL CHANGES. 2. SAWED OR FORMED CONTROL JOINTS SHOULD BE INCLUDED FOR EACH 225 SQUARE FEET OF AREA OR LESS (15 FEET BY 15 FEET). 3. SAW CUTS SHOULD NOT CUT THROUGH THE WELDED WIRE FABRIC OR REINFORCING STEEL AND DOWELS SHOULD BE UTILIZED AT FORMED AND/OR COLD JOINTS. 6" COMPACTED AGGREGATE BASE CL. 5 OR 2 MN/DOT 3138 FINISHED GRADE 8" CONCRETE MN/DOT SPEC. 2301 DRAWN 1/2014 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 2033CONCRETE PAVEMENT SECTION DRAWN 1/2014 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 2034CONCRETE SIDEWALK SECTION 4" CONCRETE WALK MN/DOT 2521 4" GRANULAR MATERIAL MN/DOT 3149 WIRE MESH WIRE MESH DRAWN 12/2013 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 3001HEAVY DUTY SILT FENCE 6" 6" GEOTEXTILE FABRIC PER MNDOT 3886 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC PER MNDOT 3886 NOTES: 1. PLACE BOTTOM EDGE OF WIRE FENCE INTO 6 IN DEEP TRENCH. 2. POSTS SHALL BE: •6 FT MAX. SPACING. •STANDARD STEEL T-TYPE POSTS. •5' MIN. LENGTH POSTS, DRIVEN 2 FT INTO THE GROUND. 3. ATTACH WIRE FENCE TO STEEL POSTS WITH NO. 9 GA. ALUMINUM WIRE OR NO. 9 GALVANIZED STEEL PRE-FORMED CLIPS. 4. ATTACH FABRIC TO WIRE FENCING WITH WIRE OR ZIP TIES. A MIN. OF 3 ZIP TIES PER POST. EXTEND BOTTOM OF FABRIC INTO TRENCH. 5. BACKFILL TRENCH & COMPACT. DRAWN 12/2013 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 3010INLET PROTECTION - EXISTING STORM STRUCTURES HIGH-FLOW FABRIC CURB DEFLECTOR PLATE OVERFLOW 1-CENTER OF FILTER ASSEMBLY OVERFLOW 2 - TOP OF CURB BOX POLYESTER SLEEVE MANHOLE COVER ASSEMBLY FILTER ASSEMBLY 27" 27" SEDIMENT CONTROL BARRIER 2'X3' SEDIMENT CONTROL BARRIER ROAD DRAIN HIGH-FLOW INLET PROTECTION CURB AND GUTTER MODEL WIMCO ROAD DRAIN HARD SURFACE PUBLIC ROAD 2' MINIMUM 1" TO 2" WASHED ROCK 6" MINIMUM DRAWN 12/2013 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 3003ROCK ENTRANCE TO CONSTRUCTION SITE NOTES: 1. ROCK SIZE SHOULD BE 1" TO 2" IN SIZE SUCH AS MN/DOT CA-1 OR CA-2 COURSE AGGREGATE. (WASHED) 2. A GEOTEXTILE FABRIC MAY BE USED UNDER THE ROCK TO PREVENT MIGRATION OF THE UNDERLYING SOIL INTO THE STONE. 15' (MIN) SIGN 24"X36"X3/4" PLYWOOD PAINT PLYWOOD FACE WHITE WITH 4"MIN. STENCILED LETTERS PAINTED BLACK 8'TREATED 4"X4" POST CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA WASHOUT AREA MUST BE IMPERMEABLE. CONTRACTOR TO CONSTRUCT APPROPRIATE IMPERMEABLE CONTAINMENT SYSTEM & REMOVE/PUMP LIQUID ONCE THE LEVEL EXCEEDS TWO-THIRDS OF THE SURROUNDING BARRIER CONTRACTOR TO PLACE THE CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE MIN. 8" DIA BIO LOGS MIN. 2FT HIGH SOIL BERM DRAWN 12/2013 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 3005CONCRETE WASHOUT NOTE: GRANULAR MATERIALS FURNISHED FOR USE IN FOUNDATION, BEDDING, ENCASEMENT, OR BACKFILL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS: •FOUNDATION MATERIALS SHALL HAVE 100% PASSING THE 1 1/2" SIEVE AND A MAXIMUM OF 10% PASSING THE No. 4 SIEVE. NOT LESS THAN 50% OF THE MATERIAL RETAINED BY THE No. 4 SIEVE SHALL HAVE ONE (1) OR MORE CRUSHED FACES. HARD, DURABLE CRUSHED CARBONATE QUARRY ROCK MAY BE USED FOR FOUNDATION MATERIALS. •BEDDING AND ENCASEMENT MATERIALS FOR FLEXIBLE PIPE SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF MNDOT SPECIFICATION 3149.2B1, GRANULAR BORROW, EXCEPT THAT 100% SHALL PASS THE ONE INCH (1") SIEVE. •BACKFILL MATERIALS SHALL CONSIST OF SUITABLE EXISTING TRENCH MATERIALS, EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. SUITABLE MATERIAL SHALL BE DEFINED AS A MINERAL SOIL FREE OF FOREIGN MATERIALS (RUBBISH, ORGANICS & DEBRIS), FROZEN CLUMPS, OVERSIZE STONE, ROCK, CONCRETE OR BITUMINOUS CHUNKS, AND OTHER UNSUITABLE MATERIALS THAT MAY DAMAGE PIPE, PREVENT THOROUGH COMPACTION, OR INCREASE THE RISKS OF SETTLEMENT. DRAWN 12/2013 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 4008PLASTIC PIPE BEDDING PLASTIC PIPE 18"18"PIPE WIDTH ENCASEMENT BEDDING FOUNDATION (MAY NOT BE REQUIRED) 12" 6" BACKFILL COMPACTED AS SPECIFIED EXCAVATED TRENCH WIDTH DRAWN 12/2013 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 4310CONCRETE PIPE BEDDING RCP PIPE 18"18"PIPE WIDTH COMPACTED SAND OR 3 4" TO 1-1 2" CLEAR ROCK (AS DIRECTED) COMPACTED SUBGRADE 6" RCP PIPE 18"18"PIPE WIDTH SHAPE BOTTOM OF EXISTING TRENCH MATERIAL TO FIT PIPE BARREL. COMPACTED BACKFILL EXCAVATED TRENCH WIDTH CLASS C BEDDING CLASS B BEDDING COMPACTED BACKFILL EXCAVATED TRENCH WIDTH PAVEMENT SECTION BASED ON GEOTECHNICAL REPORT BY BRAUN INTERTEC, DATED MAY 28,2015 NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL REQUIRED CMP, PIPE BENDS AND TEES TO CONNECT PIPES AT THE LIMITS OF THE UNDERGROUND PIPE SYSTEM FOOTPRINT. (SEE UTILITY PLAN) 2. 4" PVC DRAINTILE SHALL FOLLOW 48" CMP PIPES AS SHOW ABOVE AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE PIPE SYSTEM. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL TEES AS NECESSARY TO CONNECT DRAINTILE OUTLET MANHOLE. 72" PERFORATED PIPE SYSTEM LOUCKS PLATE NO. 72" CMP 4" SLOTTED SINGLE WALL HDPE PIPING WITH CIRCULAR KNIT POLYMERIC FILAMENT FILTER SOCK PER ASTM D6707-01 FREE DRAINING ANGULAR WASHED STONE 2" TO 3" MAX. PARTICLE SIZE NO CARBONATE 24" FREE DRAINING GRAVEL SAND (GW, GP, GM 0R SW) PARTICLE SIZE - 0.02-0.04 INCHES 24" 72" FILTER FABRIC SEPARATOR 12"12" FILTER FABRIC SEPARATOR 6" 6" IE= 902.5 IE= 902.0 IE= 900.0 IE= 908.5 IE= 909.0 (1) 110 LF OF 72" PERFORATED CMP SEE SHEET C4-2 FOR LAYOUT LOUCKS PLATE NO. ADA SIDEWALK FROM WAYZATA BOULEVARD 20" 4" CONCRETE WALK MN/DOT 2521 4" GRANULAR MATERIAL MN/DOT 3149 MIN. OF 4" AGG. BASE UNDER CURB (IF TOTAL THICKNESS OF SECTION ALLOWS) MODULAR WALL EXTRA DEPTH CONCRETE B612 CURB AND GUTTER CRUSHED GRAVEL NOTES: 1. SEE GRADING PLAN FOR WALL AND CUR HEIGHTS ADJUST CASTING TO 14" - 12" BELOW FINISHED GRADE, TYPICAL FOR ALL CASTINGS IN PAVEMENT / *INSTALL WHEN M.H. IS PLACED OUTSIDE OF THE ROADWAY. DRAWN 12/2013 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 4300 STANDARD STORM SEWER MANHOLE WITH CONE SECTION FLOW 2" 0"-8" 2" 27" 48" CONCRETE ADJUSTING RINGS, MIN. 4" - MAX. 10" MANHOLE CASTING FRAME AND COVER-NEENAH R-1733 OR APPROVED EQUAL. INCLUDES SOLID LID & "STORM SEWER" LETTERING. RUBBER GASKETS BETWEEN EACH JOINT IN MANHOLE SECTIONS. 1. WHERE WATER MAY STAND, TOP OF MH SHALL BE 2 FEET ABOVE GROUND, AND/OR 2 FEET ABOVE THE 100 YEAR STORM WATER LEVEL. 2. ON MANHOLES 8' DEEP AND GREATER A ONE FOOT FOUR INCH (1'-4") PRECAST SECTION SHALL BE PLACED IMMEDIATELY BELOW CONE SECTION. 3. WHEN MANHOLE DEPTH IS LESS THAN 8', A TOP SLAB SHALL BE USED IN PLACE OF THE CONE. TOP SLAB SHALL BE SUITABLE FOR AASHTO HS20 HIGHWAY LOADINGS. THE SLAB SHALL BE SET ON A MORTAR BED. 4. ALL JOINTS BETWEEN SECTIONS SHALL HAVE RUBBER O-RING GASKETS. 5. MINIMUM BASE SLAB THICKNESS, 6" TO 14' DEPTH. INCREASE THICKNESS 1" FOR EACH 4' OF DEPTH GREATER THAN 14'. NOTES: STEPS 16" O.C. ON DOWNSTREAM SIDE. EXTRUDED ALUMINUM OR STEEL REINFORCED COPOLYMER PLASTIC. FLOW SECTION A-A SECTION B-B NOTES: VARIABLE THICKNESS HDPE ADJUSTING RINGS AS REQUIRED. MIN. OF 4" ADJUSTMENT AND MAX. OF 12" ADJUSTMENT. USE LARGER ADJUSTMENT RINGS TO MINIMIZE THE NUMBER OF JOINTS. INCLUDE ONE 2" RING IMMEDIATELY UNDER THE CASTING. USE TAPERED RINGS TO MATCH CASTING TO STREET GRADE. APPLY BUTYL SEALANT BETWEEN ALL THE JOINTS. CONCRETE RINGS SET IN A MORTAR BED ARE ACCEPTABLE. ADJUST CASTING TO 14" - 12" BELOW FINISHED GRADE, TYPICAL FOR ALL CASTINGS IN PAVEMENT NOTE: ALL CONNECTIONS THROUGH MH SHALL HAVE A RUBBER BOOT. ANY FIELD ADDED OPENING FOR PIPE SHALL BE CORE DRILLED AND AN ELASTOMERIC RUBBER BOOT INSTALLED. / * INSTALL WHEN M.H. IS PLACED OUTSIDE OF THE ROADWAY. BENCH SLOPE DRAWN 12/2013 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 4001 STANDARD SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE WITH JOINT SEALS MANHOLE CASTING AND COVER, NEENAH R-1642 OR APPROVED EQUAL WITH TWO (2) CONCEALED PICK HOLES. 1. WHERE WATER MAY STAND, TOP OF MH SHALL BE 2 FEET ABOVE GROUND, AND/OR 2 FEET ABOVE THE 100 YEAR STORM WATER LEVEL. 2. ON MANHOLES 8' DEEP AND GREATER A ONE FOOT FOUR INCH (1'-4") PRECAST SECTION SHALL BE PLACED IMMEDIATELY BELOW CONE SECTION. 3. WHEN MANHOLE DEPTH IS LESS THAN 8', A TOP SLAB SHALL BE USED IN PLACE OF THE CONE. TOP SLAB SHALL BE SUITABLE FOR AASHTO HS20 HIGHWAY LOADINGS. THE SLAB SHALL BE SET ON A MORTAR BED. 4. ALL JOINTS BETWEEN SECTIONS SHALL HAVE RUBBER O-RING GASKETS. 5. MINIMUM BASE SLAB THICKNESS, 6" TO 14' DEPTH. INCREASE THICKNESS 1" FOR EACH 4' OF DEPTH GREATER THAN 14'. STEPS 16" O.C. ON DOWNSTREAM SIDE. EXTRUDED ALUMINUM OR STEEL REINFORCED COPOLYMER PLASTIC. 20" TO SPRING LINE (MAX.) SLOPE 2"/FOOT 7" 27" 48" A B B A 6" INFI-SHIELD EXTERNAL GATOR WRAP OR APPROVED EQUAL TYPICAL ALL BARREL JOINTS INSTALL POLYMER I/I BARRIER BY STRIKE PRODUCTS OR APPROVED EQUAL FOR ALL NEW & EXISTING STRUCTURES. ADAPTOR INC'S INTERNAL/EXTERNAL ADAPTOR SEAL OR IT'S E3 CHIMNEY SEAL PRODUCTS OR APPROVED EQUAL MAY BE USED WHEN RECONSTRUCTING EXISTING MANHOLES (WITH ENGINEERS APPROVAL).8"11" TYP.2"1" GAP (TYP. ALLSIDES)NOTES: 1. DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE WITH AASHTO, 17th EDITION. 2. DESIGN LOAD HS25. 3. EARTH COVER = 1' MAX. 4. CONCRETE STRENGTH = 3,500 psi 5. REINFORCING STEEL = ASTM A615, GRADE 60. 6. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL REINFORCING AROUND OPENINGS EQUAL TO THE BARS INTERRUPTED, HALF EACH SIDE. ADDITIONAL BARS TO BE IN THE SAME PLANE. A A2" COVER (TYP) SECTION VIEW ROUND OPTION PLAN VIEW SQUARE OPTION PLAN VIEW &035,6(5 INTERRUPTED BAR REPLACEMENT, SEE NOTE 6. STANDARD REINFORCING, SEE TABLE OPENING IN PROTECTION SLAB FOR CASTING #4 DIAGONAL TRIM BAR (TYP. 4 PLACES), SEE NOTE 7. $ INTERRUPTED BAR REPLACEMENT, SEE NOTE 6. % OPENING IN PROTECTION SLAB FOR CASTING #4 DIAGONAL TRIM BAR (TYP. 4 PLACES), SEE NOTE 7. STANDARD REINFORCING, SEE TABLE GASKET MATERIAL SUFFICIENT TO PREVENT SLAB FROM BEARING ON RISER TO BE PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR. 2 " COVER (TYP . ) % ACCESS CASTING TO BE PROVIDED AND INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR. REINFORCING TABLE &03 RISER A %REINFORCING **BEARING PRESSURE (PSF) 24" 4'X4'26"#5 @ 12" OCEW #5 @ 12" OCEW 2,410 1,780 30" 4'-6" X 4'-6"32"#5 @ 12" OCEW #5 @ 12" OCEW 2,120 1,530 36" 5' X 5'38"#5 @ 10" OCEW #5 @ 10" OCEW 1,890 1,350 42" 5'-6" X 5'-6"44"#5 @ 10" OCEW #5 @ 9" OCEW 1,720 1,210 48" 6' X 6'50"#5 @ 9" OCEW #5 @ 8" OCEW 1,600 1,100 ** ASSUMED SOIL BEARING CAPACITY1'-0"A 2" COV E R (TYP.)2" C O V E R (TYP) 7. TRIM OPENING WITH DIAGONAL #4 BARS, EXTEND BARS A MINIMUM OF 12" BEYOND OPENING, BEND BARS AS REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN BAR COVER. 8. PROTECTION SLAB AND ALL MATERIALS TO BE PROVIDED AND INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR. 9. DETAIL DESIGN BY DELTA ENGINEERING, BINGHAMTON, NY. % TYPICAL CMP ACCESS MANHOLE TYPICAL ADA WHEELCHAIR SYMBOL & PARKING SIGN "PARKING BY DISABLED PERMIT ONLY" ATTACH SIGN TO POST WITH APPROPRIATE STAINLESS STEEL BOLTS, WASHERS & NUTS. (TYP. AT TOP & BOTTOM OF SIGN) "VAN ACCESSIBLE" SIGN GRADE NOTES: 1. PROVIDE (1) SIGN PER STALL 2. SIGN MUST MEET LOCAL STANDARDS PROVIDE PAINTED WHEELCHAIR SYMBOL AT EACH DESIGNATED HANDICAP PARKING STALL. CENTER SYMBOL IN STALL. ALL LINES 5" WIDE 10" DIAMETER WHEELCHAIR SYMBOL NOT TO SCALE HANDICAP PARKING SIGN NOT TO SCALE 67.5 5 "HANDICAP DROP-OFF ZONE NO PARKING" ATTACH SIGN TO POST WITH APPROPRIATE STAINLESS STEEL BOLTS, WASHERS & NUTS. (TYP. AT TOP & BOTTOM OF SIGN) GRADE NOTES: 1. PROVIDE (1) SIGN PER ACCESS AISLE 2. SIGN MUST MEET LOCAL STANDARDS HANDICAP ACCESS ISLE NO PARKING SIGN NOT TO SCALE DRAWN 2/2016 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 2038LOUCKS SITE B City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4h) Title: Second Reading Arlington Row East Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment Page 13 07/15/16 - 100% CD'S LOUCKS W:\2015\15186.0A\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\EAST SITE\C8-2 CITY DETAILPlotted: 07 /15 / 2016 9:28 AM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. CADD QUALIFICATION SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL Arlington Row Apartments East St. Louis Park, MN Melrose Company 22375 Murray Street Excelsior, MN 55331 12/03/15 CITY SUBMITTAL 03/18/16 Watershed Resubmittal 04/27/16 85%CD / HUD Submittal 05/27/16 HUD Review Response Items 05/27/16 100% CD's 07/06/16 City PUD Amendment 07/15/16 100 % CD'S - JPS REVIEW C1.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C2.1 SITE PLAN C3.1 GRADING PLAN C3.2 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C3.3 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C3.4 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C4.1 SANITARY & WATERMAIN C4.2 STORM SEWER C8.1 DETAILS C8.2 CITY DETAILS L1.1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2.1 TREE INVENTORY PLAN HUD Project # 092-35807 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. PJ Disch - PE 49933 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. 07/15/2016 15186A PJD PJD PJD CITY DETAILS C8.2SITE B City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4h) Title: Second Reading Arlington Row East Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment Page 14 1 BO 4 HC 3 SH 19 FD 4 SJ 6 MS 3 DH 3 BH 3 BH 3 DH 3 DH 7 CE 2 BH2 BH 8 MS 6 DH 8 CE 8 LS 10 LS 6 SJ 7 EH 6 EH 5 BJ 4 FG 6 PS 9 SD 4 FG 3 EH 3 BJ 7 SG 3 BJ 6 EH 6 SG 6 FG 7 EH 4 BJ 8 FG 8 SG 4 BJ 7 SG 2 GS 1 PE 2 HC 3 BS 4 AG 4 BL 3 GS 25 SJ 7 AP 1 BO DECIDUOUS TREES QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME CONT SIZE AG 4 AUTUMN GOLD GINKGO Ginkgo biloba `Autumn Gold`B & B 2.5"Cal BO 2 BICOLOR OAK Quercus bicolor B & B 2.5"Cal BL 4 BOULEVARD LINDEN Tilia americana `Boulevard`B & B 2.5"Cal PE 1 PRINCETON ELM Ulmus americana `Princeton`B & B 2.5"Cal SH 3 SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST Gleditsia triacanthos `Skycole`B & B 2.5"Cal EVERGREEN TREES QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME CONT SIZE AP 7 AUSTRIAN PINE Pinus nigra B & B 6` HGT BS 3 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE Picea glauca `Densata`B & B 6` HGT ORNAMENTAL TREES QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME CONT SIZE HC 6 HARVEST GOLD CRABAPPLE Malus x `Harvest Gold`B & B 1.5"Cal SHRUBS QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME MIN CONT MIN SIZE SPACING DH 15 DWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLE Diervilla lonicera 5 gal 18" HGT 42" o.c. EH 29 ENDLESS SUMMER HYDRANGEA Hydrangea macrophylla `Endless Summer` TM 5 gal 24" HGT 48" o.c. FD 19 FIREDANCE DOGWOOD Cornus sericea `Bailadeline`5 gal 24" HGT 60" o.c. GS 5 GRO-LOW FRAGRANT SUMAC Rhus aromatica `Gro-Low`5 gal 24" SPRD 72" o.c. LS 18 LITTLE PRINCESS SPIREA Spirea japonica `Little Princess`5 gal 24" HGT 36" o.c. MS 14 MARLEEN SNOWBERRY Symphoricarpos x doorenbosii `Marleen` 5 gal 24" HGT 42" o.c. CONIFEROUS SHRUBS QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME MIN CONT MIN SIZE SPACING BJ 19 BLUE RUG JUNIPER Juniperus horizontalis `Wiltonii`5 gal 24" SPRD 60" o.c. CE 15 CANADALE GOLD EUONYMUS Euonymus fortunei `Canadale Gold`5 gal 24" SPRD 42" o.c. SJ 35 SEA GREEN JUNIPER Juniperus chinensis `Sea Green`5 gal 24" HGT 60" o.c. PERENNIALS QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME MIN CONT MIN SIZE SPACING BH 10 BLUE ANGEL HOSTA Hosta `Blue Angel`1 gal 36" o.c. FG 22 FEATHER REED GRASS Calamagrostis x acutiflora `Karl Foerster`1 gal 30" o.c. PS 6 PURPLE EMPEROR SEDUM Sedum `Purple Emperor`1 gal 24" o.c. SG 28 SHENANDOAH SWITCH GRASS Panicum virgatum `Shenendoah`1 gal 30" o.c. SD 9 STELLA D` ORO DAYLILY Hemerocallis x `Stella de Oro`1 gal 24" o.c. PLANT SCHEDULE 07/15/16 - 100% CD's LOUCKS W:\2015\15186.0A\CADD DATA\LANDSCAPE\_dwg Sheet Files\East\L1-1Plotted: 07 /15 / 2016 9:32 AM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. CADD QUALIFICATION SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL Arlington Row Apartments East St. Louis Park, MN Melrose Company 22375 Murray Street Excelsior, MN 55331 12/03/15 CITY SUBMITTAL 03/18/16 Watershed Resubmittal 04/27/16 85%CD / HUD Submittal 05/27/16 HUD Review Response Items 05/27/16 100% CD's 07/06/16 City PUD Amendment 07/15/16 100% CD'S - JPS REVIEW C1.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C2.1 SITE PLAN C3.1 GRADING PLAN C3.2 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C3.3 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C3.4 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C4.1 SANITARY & WATERMAIN C4.2 STORM SEWER C8.1 DETAILS C8.2 CITY DETAILS L1.1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2.1 TREE INVENTORY PLAN HUD Project # 092-35807 LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION: COORDINATE THE PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION AND PLANTING INSTALLATION WITH OTHER CONTRACTORS WORKING ON SITE. NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL COMPLETE GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. WHERE SOD/SEED ABUTS PAVED SURFACES, FINISHED GRADE OF SOD/SEED SHALL BE HELD 1" BELOW SURFACE ELEVATION OF TRAIL, SLAB, CURB, ETC. SEED ALL AREAS DISTURBED DUE TO GRADING OTHER THAN THOSE AREAS NOTED TO RECEIVE SOD. SEED SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MULCHED AS PER MNDOT SPECS. SOD ALL DESIGNATED AREAS DISTURBED DUE TO GRADING. SOD SHALL BE LAID PARALLEL TO THE CONTOURS AND SHALL HAVE STAGGERED JOINTS. ON SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 OR IN DRAINAGE SWALES, THE SOD SHALL BE STAKED TO THE GROUND. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, ALL SHRUBS SHALL HAVE AT LEAST 5 CANES AT THE SPECIFIED MINIMUM SHRUB HEIGHT OR WIDTH. ORNAMENTAL TREES SHALL HAVE NO V CROTCHES AND SHALL BEGIN BRANCHING NO LOWER THAN 3' ABOVE ROOT BALL. STREET AND BOULEVARD TREES SHALL BEGIN BRANCHING NO LOWER THAN 5' ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. ANY CONIFEROUS TREE PREVIOUSLY PRUNED FOR CHRISTMAS TREE SALES SHALL NOT BE USED. ALL CONIFEROUS TREES SHALL BE FULL FORM, NATURAL TO THE SPECIES, WITHOUT PRUNING. PLAN TAKES PRECEDENCE OVER PLANT SCHEDULE IF DISCREPANCIES IN QUANTITIES EXIST. SPECIFICATIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER NOTES. NO PLANT MATERIAL SUBSTITUTIONS WILL BE ACCEPTED UNLESS APPROVAL IS REQUESTED OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF A BID AND/OR QUOTATION. ALL PROPOSED PLANTS SHALL BE LOCATED AND STAKED AS SHOWN ON PLAN. ADJUSTMENTS IN LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLANT MATERIALS MAY BE NEEDED IN FIELD. SHOULD AN ADJUSTMENT BE ADVISED, THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST BE NOTIFIED. ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE FERTILIZED UPON INSTALLATION WITH A 27-3-3 SLOW RELEASE FERTILIZER MIXED IN WITH THE PLANTING SOIL PER THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. PLANTS MAY BE TREATED FOR SUMMER AND FALL INSTALLATION WITH AN APPLICATION OF GRANULAR 27-3-3 AT 6 OZ PER 2.5" CALIPER PER TREE AND 3 OZ PER SHRUB WITH AN ADDITIONAL APPLICATION OF 27-3-3 THE FOLLOWING SPRING IN THE TREE SAUCER. ALL PLANTING AREAS RECEIVING GROUND COVER, PERENNIALS, ANNUALS, AND/OR VINES SHALL RECEIVE A MINIMUM OF 12" DEPTH OF PLANTING SOIL CONSISTING OF AT LEAST 45 PARTS TOPSOIL, 45 PARTS PEAT OR MANURE AND 10 PARTS SAND. ALL PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER PLANTING DETAILS. REMOVE ALL FLAGGING AND LABELS FROM PLANTS. WRAPPING MATERIAL SHALL BE CORRUGATED PVC PIPING 1" GREATER IN CALIPER THAN THE TREE BEING PROTECTED OR QUALITY, HEAVY, WATERPROOF CREPE PAPER MANUFACTURED FOR THIS PURPOSE. WRAP ALL DECIDUOUS TREES PLANTED IN THE FALL PRIOR TO 12-1 AND REMOVE ALL WRAPPING AFTER 5-1. BLACK METAL EDGER TO BE USED TO CONTAIN SHRUBS, PERENNIALS, AND ANNUALS WHERE BED MEETS SOD/SEED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. ALL ANNUAL AND PERENNIAL PLANTING BEDS TO RECEIVE 3" DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH WITH NO WEED BARRIER. ALL SHRUB BED MASSINGS TO RECEIVE 3" DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH AND FIBER MAT WEED BARRIER. ALL TREES TO RECEIVE 4" DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH WITH NO MULCH IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH TREE TRUNK. SPREAD GRANULAR PRE EMERGENT HERBICIDE (PREEN OR EQUAL) PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS UNDER ALL MULCHED AREAS. MAINTENANCE STRIPS TO HAVE EDGER AND MULCH AS SPECIFIED/INDICATED ON DRAWING OR IN SPECIFICATION. IF THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS CONCERNED OR PERCEIVES ANY DEFICIENCIES IN THE PLANT SELECTIONS, SOIL CONDITIONS OR ANY OTHER SITE CONDITION WHICH MIGHT NEGATIVELY AFFECT PLANT ESTABLISHMENT, SURVIVAL OR GUARANTEE, HE MUST BRING THESE DEFICIENCIES TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO PROCUREMENT AND/OR INSTALLATION. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A WRITTEN REQUEST FOR THE OWNER ACCEPTANCE INSPECTION OF ALL LANDSCAPE AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ON-GOING MAINTENANCE OF ALL NEWLY INSTALLED MATERIALS UNTIL TIME OF OWNER ACCEPTANCE. ANY ACTS OF VANDALISM OR DAMAGE WHICH MAY OCCUR PRIOR TO OWNER ACCEPTANCE SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH A MAINTENANCE PROGRAM INCLUDING, BUT NOT NECESSARILY LIMITED TO, PRUNING, FERTILIZATION AND DISEASE/PEST CONTROL. CONTRACTOR SHALL GUARANTEE NEW PLANT MATERIAL THROUGH ONE CALENDAR YEAR FROM THE DATE OF OWNER ACCEPTANCE. WARRANTY (ONE FULL GROWING SEASON) FOR LANDSCAPE MATERIALS SHALL BEGIN ON THE DATE OF ACCEPTANCE BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AFTER THE COMPLETION OF PLANTING OF ALL LANDSCAPE MATERIALS. NO PARTIAL ACCEPTANCE WILL BE CONSIDERED. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE THE APPROPRIATE DATES FOR SPRING PLANT MATERIAL INSTALLATION AND SEED/SOD PLACEMENT IS FROM THE TIME GROUND HAS THAWED TO JUNE 15. FALL SODDING IS GENERALLY ACCEPTABLE FROM AUGUST 15 - NOVEMBER 1. FALL SEEDING FROM AUGUST 15 - SEPTEMBER 15; DORMANT SEEDING IN THE FALL SHALL NOT OCCUR PRIOR TO NOVEMBER 1. FALL CONIFEROUS PLANTING MAY OCCUR FROM AUGUST 15 - OCTOBER 1 AND DECIDUOUS PLANTING FROM THE FIRST FROST UNTIL NOVEMBER 15. PLANTING OUTSIDE THESE DATES IS NOT RECOMMENDED. ANY ADJUSTMENT MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. PROTECT ALL EXISTING OAKS ON SITE SCHEDULED TO REMAIN. IF EXISTING OAKS ARE DAMAGED IN ANY MANNER, ABOVE OR BELOW GROUND IN THE ROOT SYSTEM, AN ASPHALTIC TREE PRUNING PAINT SHOULD BE APPLIED IMMEDIATELY AFTER WOUNDING. OAKS ARE NOT TO BE PRUNED, REMOVED OR TRANSPLANTED BETWEEN APRIL 15 AND JULY 1. NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IF THESE DATES ARE UNAVOIDABLE. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL ESTABLISH TO HIS SATISFACTION THAT SOIL AND COMPACTION CONDITIONS ARE ADEQUATE TO ALLOW FOR PROPER DRAINAGE AT AND AROUND THE BUILDING SITE. IRRIGATION NOTES: VERIFY EXISTING/PROPOSED IRRIGATION SYSTEM LAYOUT AND CONFIRM COMPLETE LIMITS OF IRRIGATION PRIOR TO SUPPLYING SHOP DRAWINGS. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AN IRRIGATION LAYOUT PLAN AND SPECIFICATION AS A PART OF THE SCOPE OF WORK WHEN BIDDING. THESE SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO ORDER AND/OR INSTALLATION. IT SHALL BE THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO INSURE THAT ALL SODDED/SEEDED AND PLANTED AREAS ARE IRRIGATED PROPERLY, INCLUDING THOSE AREAS DIRECTLY AROUND AND ABUTTING BUILDING FOUNDATION. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH AN IRRIGATION SCHEDULE APPROPRIATE TO THE PROJECT SITE CONDITIONS AND TO PLANT MATERIAL GROWTH REQUIREMENTS. IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS NOT TO SPRINKLE ACROSS PAVEMENT. THE SYSTEM SHALL INCORPORATE A RAIN SENSOR INTO IRRIGATION SYSTEM. PLANTINGS OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF IRRIGATION ARE TO BE WATERED REGULARLY UNTIL PLANTING/SOD/SEED HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. N Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Timothy J. Fedie - LA 48303 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. 07/15/16 15186A MJS TJF TJF LANDSCAPE PLAN: DORA CALCULATIONS: SITE AREA = 39,967 SQ.FT. DORA REQUIRED (12% OF SITE AREA) = 4,796 SQ.FT. DORA PROPOSED = 5,651 SQ.FT. OR 14% (MARKED ON PLAN WITH HATCH) PLANTING DETAILS: LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS: 1 TREE PER UNIT (ORNAMENTALS AT 2:1 RATIO) 6 SHRUBS PER 1,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA PROPOSED UNITS = 27 GROSS FLOOR AREA = 28,088 SF TREES REQUIRED = 27 TREES PROPOSED = 14 OVERSTORY, 10 CONIFEROUS, 6 ORNAMENTAL SHRUBS REQUIRED = 169 SHRUBS PROPOSED = 169 TREE MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS = 48 CALIPER INCHES TOTAL PROPOSED = 69 CALIPER INCHES LANDSCAPE PLAN L1.1SITE B City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4h) Title: Second Reading Arlington Row East Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment Page 15 07/15/16 - 100% CD's LOUCKS W:\2015\15186.0A\CADD DATA\LANDSCAPE\_dwg Sheet Files\East\L2-1Plotted: 07 /15 / 2016 9:32 AM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. CADD QUALIFICATION SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL Arlington Row Apartments East St. Louis Park, MN Melrose Company 22375 Murray Street Excelsior, MN 55331 12/03/15 CITY SUBMITTAL 03/18/16 Watershed Resubmittal 04/27/16 85%CD / HUD Submittal 05/27/16 HUD Review Response Items 05/27/16 100% CD's 07/06/16 City PUD Amendment 07/15/16 100% CD'S - JPS REVIEW C1.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C2.1 SITE PLAN C3.1 GRADING PLAN C3.2 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C3.3 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C3.4 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C4.1 SANITARY & WATERMAIN C4.2 STORM SEWER C8.1 DETAILS C8.2 CITY DETAILS L1.1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2.1 TREE INVENTORY PLAN HUD Project # 092-35807 N Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Timothy J. Fedie - LA 48303 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.15186A MJS TJF TJF TREE INVENTORY PLAN: TREE MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS: TOTAL CALIPER INCHES = 40 CALIPER INCHES TO BE REMOVED = 40 CALIPER INCHES TO BE SAVED = 0 ((40/40)-0.2) x 1.5 x 40 = 48 48 CALIPER INCHES REQUIRED FOR MITIGATION REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR QUANTITY AND LOCATION OF PROPOSED TREES. TREE INVENTORY PLAN L2.1SITE B City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4h) Title: Second Reading Arlington Row East Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment Page 16 HSS STEEL TUBE GALV & PAINTED, BY SOLAR CONTRACTOR 16" CAST IN PLACE PIER WITH RUBBED FINISH AND SLOPED TOP 24" CAST IN PLACE PIER HOLD 6' BELOW FINISH GRADE CAST IN PLACE FOOTING STEEL COLUMN BOLTED TO PIER AND ENCASED IN CONCRETE 18' - 0" PARKING STALL DEPTH SEE MANUF DRAWINGSMIN 8' - 6" CLEARFROM PARKING STALL OPEN END MIN 2' - 0" SEE MANUF DRAWINGS NOTE: •ALL DIMENSION AND MEMBER SIZE SHOWN FOR DESIGN INTENT •SOLAR CANOPY INSTALLER TO PROVIDE ENGINEERED DRAWINGS •ALL EXTERIOR STEEL TO BE GALVANIZED AND PAINTED 6"FINISH GRADE - SEE CIVIL FINISH GRADE3' - 0" ABOVE TOP OF PIER SLOPE DIRECTION SHOWN TYPICAL - INSTALLER TO VERIFY AND COORDINATE FACING TO OPTIMIZE PRODUCTION EFFICIENCY 10°BOLTED CONNECTION CAR "BASH BAR" ICE / SNOW GUARD 8' - 6"1' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"1' - 6"8' - 6"0"8' - 6"8' - 6"1' - 6"8' - 6"0"8' - 6"8' - 6"1' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"1' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"1' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"9" 1 AS1.5 27' - 0"27' - 0"27' - 0"27' - 0"27' - 0"27' - 0"12' - 0"12' - 0"162' - 0" 27' - 0"27' - 0"27' - 0" 9"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"1' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"1' - 6"8' - 0"8' - 0"8' - 6" 27' - 0"27' - 0"27' - 0" 81' - 0"12' - 0"12' - 0"27' - 0"27' - 0"27' - 0"0"9"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"1' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"1' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"9" 27' - 0"27' - 0"27' - 0" 81' - 0"12' - 0"12' - 0"elness swenson graham architects 500 washington avenue south m inneapolis m innesota 55415 p. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 5 0 8 f. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 3 8 2 w w w . e s g a r c h . c o m I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or r e p ort was prepared by m e or under m y direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of M innesota Signature Typed or Printed Nam e License # D ate PROJECT NUM BER D RAW N BY CHECKED BY O RIGINAL ISSUE: R EVISIO NS KEY PLAN N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T IO N **D R A F T ** H UD PRO JECT NUM BER 6/29/2016 2:14:45 PMA S1.5 S OLAR CANOPY 2 15515 M E C hecker 7 /6/2016 A RLINGTON ROW A RLINGTON ROW S T. LO UIS PARK, M N 5 /27/2016 - 100% C D's 0 92-35807 No.Description Date 2 7/6/2016 - City PUD Am endm ent 7/6/2016 1/4" = 1'-0"AS1.5 1 Solar Canopy 1/8" = 1'-0"AS1.5 A1 Solar Canopy A - 1 1/8" = 1'-0"AS1.5 B2 Solar Canopy B - 2 1/8" = 1'-0"AS1.5 B1 Solar Canopy B - 1 2 Solar Arrays B1 3 Bays @ 27' OC (60 Panels) 5 x 13 B2 3 Bays @ 27' OC (60 Panels) 5 x 13 A1 6 Bays @ 27' OC (135 Panels) 5 x 27 12" = 1'-0"AS1.5 2 Solar Canopy City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4h) Title: Second Reading Arlington Row East Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment Page 17 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4h) Title: Second Reading Arlington Row East Planned Unit Development (PUD) AmendmentPage 18 Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: September 6, 2016 Action Agenda Item: 4i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Second Reading of Ordinance Amending St. Louis Park City Code Chapter 3, Section 70 (g)(1) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to approve the second reading and Adopt Ordinance amending St. Louis Park City Code Chapter 3 , Section 70 (g)(1) to Exempt Congressionally Chartered Veterans Organizations Holding a Club Liquor License from the 50% Food Ratio Requirement and to approve the summary ordinance for publication. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Should Congressionally Chartered Veterans Organizations holding a Club On-Sale liquor license be exempt from the requirement to have at least 50% of the establishment’s gross receipts attributable to the sale of food? SUMMARY: On May 9 and July 11, 2016 the City Council reviewed a request from Frank Lundberg American Legion Post 282 for consideration of an ordinance amendment that would formally exempt the holders of a Club On-Sale Intoxicating liquor license from the requirement that at least 50% of the gross receipts of the establishment be attributable to the sale of food. At that time the Council directed staff to draft an ordinance amendment that would specifically exempt Congressionally Chartered Veterans Organizations holding a Club liquor license from the food ratio requirement because their establishments are meant to serve as places for members of the organization to congregate socially. Patrons of these establishments are required to be either members of the organization or guests of members, and food and alcohol sales are incidental to the overall purpose of the organization. The American Legion is not proposing to eliminate the sale of food at their establishment. The City Council approved the first reading of the ordinance amendment at their regular meeting on August 15, 2016. The American Legion was chartered and incorporated by Congress in 1919 as a patriotic veterans organization devoted to mutual helpfulness. It is a nonpartisan, not-for-profit organization whose success depends entirely on active membership, participation and volunteerism. The American Legion currently holds Club On-Sale and On-Sale Sunday liquor licenses. Minnesota Statute 340A.404, Subd. 1(a)(4) allows cities to issue an on-sale intoxicating liquor license to “clubs or congressionally chartered veterans organizations with the approval of the commissioner, provided that the organization has been in existence for at least three years and liquor sales will only be to members and bona fide guests”. NEXT STEPS: September 15, 2016 – Publication of Summary Ordinance September 30, 2016 – Ordinance Effective Date FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: None. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance Summary Ordinance M.S. 340A.101 – Definition of “Club” Letter from Frank Lundberg American Legion Post 282 Prepared by: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Approved by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4i) Page 2 Title: Second Reading of Ordinance Amending St. Louis Park City Code Chapter 3, Section 70 (g)(1) ORDINANCE NO.____-16 ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 3, SECTION 70 (g) TO EXEMPT CONGRESSIONALLY CHARTERED VETERANS’ ORGANIZATIONS HOLDING A CLUB LIQUOR LICENSE FROM THE 50% FOOD RATIO REQUIREMENT THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK DOES ORDAIN: SECTION 1. Chapter 3 is amended as follows: ARTICLE II. SALE, CONSUMPTION AND DISPLAY *** Sec. 3-70 Ineligibility. *** (g) No on-sale intoxicating liquor license, except a club license for a congressionally chartered veterans’ organization, shall be issued unless at 50 percent of the gross receipts of the establishment will be attributable to the sale of food. This requirement shall be regulated as follows: (1) Each on-sale intoxicating liquor licensee, except a congressionally chartered veterans’ organization holding a club license, shall have the continuing obligation to have at least 50 percent of gross receipts from the establishment during the preceding business year attributable to the sale of food. SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall take effect fifteen days after its passage and publication. First Reading August 15, 2016 Second Reading September 6, 2016 Date of Publication September 15, 2016 Date Ordinance takes effect September 30, 2016 ADOPTED this 6th day of September, 2016 by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park. Reviewed for Administration: ____________________________________ Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Adopted by the City Council September 6, 2016 ______________________________________ Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: ____________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Approved as to form and execution: ______________________________________ Soren Mattick, City Attorney City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4i) Page 3 Title: Second Reading of Ordinance Amending St. Louis Park City Code Chapter 3, Section 70 (g)(1) SUMMARY FOR PUBLICATION ORDINANCE NO. ____-16 ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 3, SECTION 70(g) TO EXEMPT CONGRESSIONALLY CHARTERED VETERANS’ ORGANIZATIONS HOLDING A CLUB LIQUOR LICENSE FROM THE 50% FOOD RATIO REQUIREMENT This ordinance amends Chapter 3, Section 70(g) of the City Code to exempt congressionally chartered veterans’ organizations holding a club liquor license from the minimum 50% food to liquor ratio requirement. Adopted by the City Council September 6, 2016 Jake Spano /s/ Mayor A copy of the full text of this ordinance is available for inspection with the City Clerk. Published in the St. Louis Park Sailor: September 15, 2016 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4i) Page 4 Title: Second Reading of Ordinance Amending St. Louis Park City Code Chapter 3, Section 70 (g)(1) 2015 Minnesota Statutes 340A.101 DEFINITIONS. Subd. 7. Club. "Club" is an incorporated organization organized under the laws of the state for civic, fraternal, social, or business purposes, for intellectual improvement, or for the promotion of sports, or a congressionally chartered veterans' organization, which: (1) has more than 30 members; (2) has owned or rented a building or space in a building for more than one year that is suitable and adequate for the accommodation of its members; (3) is directed by a board of directors, executive committee, or other similar body chosen by the members at a meeting held for that purpose. No member, officer, agent, or employee shall receive any profit from the distribution or sale of beverages to the members of the club, or their guests, beyond a reasonable salary or wages fixed and voted each year by the governing body. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4i) Title: Second Reading of Ordinance Amending St. Louis Park City Code Chapter 3, Section 70 (g)(1)Page 5 Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: September 6, 2016 Action Agenda Item: 4j EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: 2017 Preliminary HRA Levy Certification RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution Authorizing the 2017 Preliminary HRA Levy. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council desire to continue to levy the full 0.0185% of estimated market value allowable for HRA purposes of $1,086,461. SUMMARY: The HRA levy was originally implemented in St. Louis Park due to legislative changes in 2001 which significantly reduced future tax increment revenues. The City Council elected at that time to use the levy proceeds for future infrastructure improvements in redevelopment areas. By law, these funds could also be used for other housing and redevelopment purposes. However, they are committed to repaying the Development Fund via an interfund loan for the Highway 7 and Louisiana Ave. project until 2018 or 2019 based on the current Long Range Financial Management Plan. Given this obligation, staff recommends the HRA Levy continue at the maximum allowed by law for the 2017 budget year. The HRA Levy cannot exceed 0.0185% of the estimated market value of the City. Therefore, staff has calculated the maximum HRA Levy for 2017 to be $1,086,461 based on valuation data from Hennepin County which is an increase of $75,253 or 7.44% from 2016. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The proposed levy will help support infrastructure in redevelopment areas. VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged community. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution Prepared by: Tim Simon, Chief Financial Officer Reviewed by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4j) Page 2 Title: 2017 Preliminary HRA Levy Certification RESOLUTION NO. 16-____ RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PRELIMINARY HRA LEVY FOR 2017 WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.090 to 469.108 (the “EDA Act”), the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park created the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority (the "Authority"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the EDA Act, the City Council granted to the Authority all of the powers and duties of a housing and redevelopment authority under the provisions of the Minnesota Statutes, sections 469.001 to 469.047 (the "HRA Act"); and WHEREAS, Section 469.033, subdivision 6 of the Act authorizes the Authority to levy a tax upon all taxable property within the City to be expended for the purposes authorized by the HRA Act; and WHEREAS, such levy may be in an amount not to exceed 0.0185 percent of estimated market value of the City; and WHEREAS, the Authority has filed its budget for the special benefit levy in accordance with the budget procedures of the City in the amount of $1,086,461; and WHEREAS, based upon such budgets the Authority will levy all or such portion of the authorized levy as it deems necessary and proper; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the St. Louis Park City Council: 1. That approval is hereby given for the Authority to levy, for taxes payable in 2017, such tax upon the taxable property of the City as the Authority may determine, subject to the limitations contained in the HRA Act. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council September 6, 2016 City Manager Mayor Attest: City Clerk Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: September 6, 2016 Consent Agenda Item: 4k EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Park Place Plaza Planned Unit Development Minor Amendment - Costco Expansion RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution approving a minor amendment to the Park Place Plaza Planned Unit Development to allow additions to the Costco building. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the proposed expansion meet the requirements of the zoning ordinance and Park Place Plaza Planned Unit Development (PUD)? SUMMARY: Costco is part of the Park Place Plaza PUD. The PUD includes several properties, including Costco, Home Depot, the Office Max building, and retail buildings along Park Place Boulevard. Costco submitted an application to amend the PUD to construct a 754 square foot addition to its tire center, and a 2,738 square foot addition to its liquor store. The additions would increase the tire center from 5,200 to 5,954 square feet, and the liquor store from 3,884 to 6,622 square feet. The Costco facility is currently 140,920 square feet, and will be increased to 144,412 square feet. The application was reviewed by city departments, and no comments or revisions were requested. The plans meet city regulations. Planning Commission: The application is for a minor amendment to the PUD. As such, minor amendments do not require a public hearing or review by the Planning Commission. The application is sent directly to the city council for action. Neighborhood meeting: The proposed additions are minor in scope with no perceived impacts anticipated. Therefore, staff did not ask Costco to conduct a neighborhood meeting. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion Aerial Photo Resolution Development Plans Prepared by: Gary Morrison, Assistant Zoning Administrator Reviewed by: Sean Walther, Planning & Zoning Supervisor Approved by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Page 2 Title: Park Place Plaza Planned Unit Development Minor Amendment - Costco Expansion DISCUSSION Location: Zoning: C-2 General Commercial Comprehensive Plan: General Commercial Neighborhood: Blackstone Analysis: The proposed additions were reviewed by staff, and found to meet city code requirements. The following is an analysis of the proposal. Setbacks: The proposed additions meet the minimum setbacks required for the C-2 General Commercial district, which is the underlying zoning district for this PUD. The minimum setbacks required are five feet from the north property line, which is adjacent to 16th Street and there is no minimum setback required from the interior property lines. The tire center addition will be in the front of the building (east side), and will be located approximately 200 feet from the south interior property line and approximately 285 feet from the north property line, adjacent to 16th Street. The liquor store addition will be to the north side of the building. The existing building is 37 feet from the north property line, and the addition is proposed to be 23 feet from the north property line. Architectural: The proposed addition to the tire center and liquor store comply with the architectural standards required of the zoning ordinance. The architecture and building materials for both additions will be consistent with the existing building. The existing liquor store is 23 feet in height. This is seven feet less than the 30 foot height of the main Costco building. The addition will continue the 23-foot height of the existing liquor store. Traffic: The additions have no impact on existing truck routes through the property and city streets. The tire center addition will require some minor modifications to the parking lot and sidewalks in front of the store. Landscaping: The liquor store expansion requires minor modification to the landscaping and the private sidewalk leading from the emergency exit to the public sidewalk. The modifications in the proposed plans maintain the required and existing sidewalk routes, and are acceptable. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Page 3 Title: Park Place Plaza Planned Unit Development Minor Amendment - Costco Expansion Aerial Photo: City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Page 4 Title: Park Place Plaza Planned Unit Development Minor Amendment - Costco Expansion RESOLUTION NO. 16-____ Amends and Restates Resolutions 96-89, 96-158, 97-3, 97-39, 98-23, 00-037, 00-133, 01-080, 02-072, 05-036, 13-095, 13-107 A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 13-107 APPROVED ON July 15, 2013, AMENDING A FINAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) UNDER SECTION 14:6-7 OF THE ST. LOUIS PARK ORDINANCE CODE RELATING TO ZONING FOR PROPERTY ZONED C-2, GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED AT 5600, 5640, 5680, 5700, 5800 and 5900 CEDAR LAKE ROAD; AND 1620, 1650, 1690 AND 1700 PARK PLACE BOULEVARD; AND 5601, 5699 AND 5799 WEST 16TH STREET AND1625 ZARTHAN AVENUE (TOTAL SITE FORMERLY KNOWN AS 1625 ZARTHAN AVENUE) PARK PLACE PLAZA WHEREAS, the St. Louis Park City Zoning Ordinance permits shopping centers in excess of 200,000 square feet by Planned Unit Development (PUD) under certain conditions in the C-2 Commercial Zoning District, and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 96-38 approving the Preliminary PUD on March 18, 1996, and WHEREAS, the City staff were informed on April 12, 1996 that certain environmental remediation would be necessary and such remediation would affect the timing process of demolition of the existing building and resulted in the need to amend the conditions of preliminary approval, and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 96-71 rescinding Resolution No. 96-38 and approving the Preliminary PUD subject to certain revised conditions on May 6, 1996, and WHEREAS, a complete application for a Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) was received on April 26, 1996, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the Final PUD application at the meeting of May 1, 1996, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Final PUD subject to 17 conditions of approval on a 3-1 vote with three members present voting in the affirmative and one member voting against, and WHEREAS, the City Council received an overview from City staff and the City Attorney of the necessary agreements related to the PUD at its May 13, 1996 Study Session, and WHEREAS, the applicant and current and prospective property owners have entered into a development agreement, supplemental development agreements, sidewalk easements agreement, reciprocal easement and operation agreement, and a reversion agreement, which agreement City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Page 5 Title: Park Place Plaza Planned Unit Development Minor Amendment - Costco Expansion nullifies and voids without any further action required on the part of the City Council the preliminary and final approval if certain conditions are not met, and WHEREAS, on March 3, 1997 Franchise Associates, Inc. (current owner of 1690 Park Place Boulevard) and Ryan Construction Company of Minnesota, Inc. as developer and with the consent of Honeywell, Inc. (fee owner of 1625 Zarthan Avenue) submitted an application for a minor amendment to the approved Final PUD to allow the use of neon on the building at 1690 Park Place Boulevard and to revise the Landscape Plan for 1625 Zarthan Avenue and 5600, 5640 and 5680 Cedar Lake Road, and WHEREAS, certain amendments to the approved Final PUD have been approved by the City Council on 10/22/96 (Res. 96-158) and 1/6/97 (Res 97-3), and 3/17/97 (Res 97-39), and WHEREAS, on December 11, 1997 Office Max (current owner of 5600 Cedar Lake Road) and Ryan Construction Company of Minnesota, Inc. as developer and with the consent of Honeywell, Inc. (fee owner of 1625 Zarthan Avenue) submitted an application for a minor amendment to the approved Final PUD to allow the placement of a new 12.8 s.f. flat wall identification sign on the east face of the building at 5600 Cedar Lake Road. WHEREAS, on February 22, 2000 Costco Wholesale and Ryan Companies US, Inc as developer with the consent of Honeywell, Inc. submitted an application for a major amendment to the approved Final PUD to allow the construction of a 139,444 square foot wholesale, retail and tire service facility at 5801 West 16th Street. WHEREAS, on October 23, 2000 Costco Wholesale and Ryan Companies US, Inc. as developer with the consent of Honeywell, Inc. submitted a minor amendment to the approved Final PUD to allow changes to the traffic improvements at 16th Street and the main access into the site. WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 01-133 on November 6, 2000 approving a minor amendment to the approved Final PUD to allow changes to the traffic improvements at 16th Street and the main access into the site, and WHEREAS, on April 16, 2001, Costco Wholesale filed an application seeking a major amendment to the approved Planned Unit Development for Park Place Plaza to construct a fueling facility on Lot 9, and WHEREAS, on June 20, 2001, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, received testimony from the public, reviewed the application, and on a vote of 4-0 moved that the Planning Commission deny the proposed major amendment to the PUD, and WHEREAS, on July 16, 2001, the City Council considered the request for a major amendment, and on a vote of 7-0 moved to continue to the request, and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 01-080 on August 20, 2001 approving a major amendment to the approved Planned Unit Development for Park Place Plaza to construct a fueling facility on Lot 9, and WHEREAS, on June 7, 2002, Costco Wholesale filed an application seeking a minor amendment to the approved Planned Unit Development for Park Place Plaza to construct a wholesale liquor addition on Lot 1, and City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Page 6 Title: Park Place Plaza Planned Unit Development Minor Amendment - Costco Expansion WHEREAS, on December 2, 2004, Home Depot USA, Inc. filed an application seeking a minor amendment to the approved Planned Unit Development for Park Place Plaza to construct an addition of 5,764 square feet to the existing garden center on Lot 2, Block 1, Park Place Plaza, and WHEREAS, on May 9, 2013, Costco Wholesale filed an application seeking a minor amendment to the approved Planned Unit Development for Park Place Plaza to transfer land and parking spaces from Home Depot USA, Inc. (Lot 2, Block 1, Park Place Plaza) to Costco Wholesale (Lot 1, Block 1, Park Place Plaza), and WHEREAS, on June 7, 2013, Costco Wholesale filed an application seeking a minor amendment to the approved Planned Unit Development for Park Place Plaza to expand the fueling facility on Lot 9, and WHEREAS, on July 15, 2016, Costco Wholesale filed an application seeking a minor amendment to the approved Planned Unit Development for Park Place Plaza to expand their liquor store and tire center. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park: A. Recitals The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein and made part of this resolution. B. Findings 1. Ryan Construction Company of Minnesota, Inc., as developer with the consent of the property owner Honeywell, Inc., has made application to the City Council for approval of a Final Planned Unit Development (“Final PUD”) within the C-2 General Commercial Zoning District under Section 14:6-7 of the St. Louis Park Ordinance for property formerly known as 1625 Zarthan Avenue for the legal description as follows, to-wit: Lots 1-9 and Outlots A, B and C; Block 1, Park Place Plaza (Torrens) 2. The City Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission (Case No. 95-51-PUD) and the effect of the proposed Final PUD and amendments thereto on the health, safety and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area, the effect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan, with specific consideration given to the Plan By Neighborhood Section of the Comprehensive Plan, and compliance with the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. 3. The City Council has determined that approval of a Final PUD and the proposed amendments thereto will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community nor with certain contemplated traffic improvements will it cause serious traffic congestion or hazards, nor will it seriously depreciate surrounding property values. The Council has also determined that the proposed Final PUD and amendments thereto are in harmony with the general provisions, purpose and intent of the City’s Zoning Ordinance and its Comprehensive Plan and that the requested modifications comply with the requirements of Section 14:6-7.2(E). City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Page 7 Title: Park Place Plaza Planned Unit Development Minor Amendment - Costco Expansion 4. The contents of Planning Case Files 95-51-PUD, 02-38-PUD, and 04-70-PUD are hereby entered into and made part of the public hearing record and the record of decision for this case. C. Conditions and Approval A Final PUD at the location described in paragraph 1 of the above findings is approved based on the recitals and the findings set forth above, the Approved Final Plans, and subject to the following conditions: 1. Issuance of demolition and erosion control permits shall be subject to the following conditions as required in the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) Resolution and subsequently modified on March 18, 1996 and May 6, 1996 as follows: a. Demolition, hauling and construction activities shall be limited to the hours between 7:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. on weekdays and 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. on weekends and holidays. b. Trucks and construction equipment shall be prohibited from using Zarthan Avenue between Cedar Lake Road and 16th Street and shall enter and exit the site from 16th Street and Park Place Boulevard only. c. During demolition of the existing building, the western wall of the building shall be left intact as a sound barrier for as long as practicable. d. Use of explosives shall be prohibited. e. All demolition and construction equipment shall utilize state of the art muffler systems. f. On-site crushing and recycling operations shall be located as far from existing residential land uses as practicable. 2. Approval of the Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development and Plat shall be subject to the following conditions as required in the EAW Resolution and subsequently modified on March 18, 1996 and by this resolution as follows: a. Installation of all roadway improvements associated with anticipated traffic from the proposed use and dedication of public right-of-way to accommodate public infrastructure. b. Adjustments to existing traffic lights, street lights and other utilities. c. Installation of sidewalks along the length of Cedar Lake Road, Park Place Boulevard, 16th Street, and Zarthan Avenue adjacent to the project and connecting to public plaza areas within the site. d. Dedication of drainage and utility easements to a depth of 10 feet back from planned right- of-way and execution of a sidewalks easement agreement. Such sidewalk easements shall extend 1 foot beyond required perimeter sidewalks. e. Installation of on-site directional signs to I-394 and Highway 100 to prevent unnecessary traffic in residential neighborhoods. f. Delivery and garbage service trucks shall be prohibited from using Zarthan Avenue between Cedar Lake Road and 16th Street and shall be limited to servicing the uses between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. on weekdays and 9:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. on weekends and holidays. Unoccupied delivery and garbage trucks shall be prohibited from idling on site during nighttime hours as defined by Section 11-507(3)(a). g. Overnight parking of vehicles, semi-trailers, refrigeration units and the like shall be prohibited unless parked wholly within any of the enclosed loading dock bays. h. Openings of rooftop fans and air circulation equipment shall be required to face away from residential neighborhoods and all exhaust openings except bathroom fans shall be prohibited on exterior walls facing residential neighborhoods. In the event bathroom fan exhausts exceed the maximum nighttime allowable noise limits, operation of these fans City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Page 8 Title: Park Place Plaza Planned Unit Development Minor Amendment - Costco Expansion shall be terminated until compliance with the City of St. Louis Park Noise Ordinance is achieved. i Compliance with ordinance provisions relating to exterior lighting and prevention of unnecessary nighttime site lighting. j. Compliance with all applicable City ordinance provisions shall be required unless modifications are specifically authorized by this Final Planned Unit Development approval or by more stringent requirements of the development agreement or supplemental development agreements. 3. The following modifications to ordinance requirements are authorized as part of this Final PUD approval: a. Bufferyards are not required between drive through facilities and adjacent properties that are part of the Final PUD. b. The temporary hoop structures associated with Home Depot’s “Garden Center” outdoor sales area are not required to be architecturally integrated with the principal building (utilize same building materials) provided masonry walls surrounding the outdoor sales area are provided as shown on the Approved Final Plans. c. A Bufferyard “D” may be substituted for the required Bufferyard “F” between the truck circulation and loading areas for the Retail/Service/Restaurant building on Lot 5 and Park Place Boulevard. d. Buildings are not required to utilize at least 60% brick or other natural stone on each building face but are approved with percentages of brick and other materials as shown on the Approved Final Plans. e. Buildings on Lots 2 and 3 may have more than 5% bright, pure accent colors on each facade and are approved with the percentages of accent colors shown on colored elevations “stamped” as received by the City on March 15, 1996 and on April 19, 1996 (Exhibits B2 and B3 of the Approved Final Plans). f. The area of all wall signs may exceed 7% of the building wall area but may not exceed the wall sign area shown on the Approved Final Plans. Exhibit A7 of the Approved Final Plans shall be revised to reduce cumulative wall signage by at least 37 square feet in accordance with the Preliminary PUD approval. g. Individual wall signs may exceed 150 square feet but may not exceed the individual wall sign areas shown on the Approved Final Plans. h. Two free standing “off-premise signs”, advertising uses on properties within the PUD only, are allowed as shown on the Approved Final Plans. Such signs are denoted on the Approved Final Plans as “Center Pylon Signs” and also as “Monument Signs”. Such signs may also be referenced as “Project Identification Signs” or “Tenant Identification Signs”. i. The maximum size of the “Center Pylon Sign” faces may exceed 300 square feet and may be 320 square feet each as shown on the Approved Final Plans. j. The maximum total sign area of the “Center Pylon Signs” may exceed 400 square feet and may be 1,280 square feet as shown on the Approved Final Plans. k. One Monument Sign measuring no more than 4 feet 4 inches in height and 16 feet in width and identifying only the name of the Shopping Center may be placed in Outlot A as shown on the Approved Final Plans. Such sign shall include seating on one side, shall be faced primarily with brick, and shall not be counted toward the total approved sign areas. l. Exterior lighting spillover may exceed 1.0 footcandle at property lines that abut other properties within the Final PUD but may not exceed ordinance restrictions at property lines that abut properties that are not within the PUD. m. The Bufferyard “D”s separating the in-vehicle sales and service uses (drive-throughs) on Lots 4,5,6,7 and 8 of the Plat from 16th Street and Park Place Boulevard are not required City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Page 9 Title: Park Place Plaza Planned Unit Development Minor Amendment - Costco Expansion to include a minimum of 95 plant units per 100 linear feet and may include a total of 225 fewer plant units than required as shown on the Approved Final Plans. n. Certain canopy trees may be installed at sizes less than 2-1/2” caliper as shown on the Approved Final Plans and such trees shall be given full plant unit credits. o. Certain evergreen trees may be installed at sizes less than 6 feet (height) as shown on the Approved Final Plans and such trees shall be given full plant unit credits. 4. The site shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with the Approved Final Plans, which are incorporated herein as Exhibits P1, P2, S1, S2, C1, C2, C3, L1, L2, L3, L4, L5, A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A7 as revised by condition 3f of this resolution, A8, A9, F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6 (“Park Place Plaza” Monument Sign Detail), B1, B2 and B3, and the following conditions: a. MPCA approval of the remediation plan relating to environmental contamination on the site and conformance with the conditions of the approved remediation plan. b. Final PUD approval is contingent upon the developer and current/prospective property owners, including Home Depot, signing the required agreements and conforming with all provisions of the executed special assessment agreements for construction of required off- site improvements, executed development agreement and executed supplemental development agreements that cover all on-site improvements within the PUD in accordance with Section 14:6-7.5(F), executed sidewalk easements agreement, executed reciprocal easements and operation agreement, and the executed reversion agreement. Wherever there is a conflict between the requirements of any of said documents, City Code, and/or this resolution, the more stringent requirements shall apply. c. The type and colors of all exterior building materials (including building facades, canopies, screen walls, fences, trash enclosures, and permanent exterior signage) throughout the Final PUD must match those adopted as part of the Approved Final Plans, and no exterior building materials other than doors may be surface painted (this requirement does not prohibit the use of standing seam metal with a baked enamel finish, as approved). Said doors shall be painted to match the approved brick or rock face block color. All exterior building materials must be maintained in an aesthetic manner as determined in the sole discretion of the City. d. Wherever brick is denoted on the Approved Final Plans, a full 4” thick face brick must be applied in a masonry technique except that an alternative brick application, face brick cast in structural panels, is specifically approved for the Home Depot building on Lot 2. The alternative brick application for Lot 2 must match the color, texture and visual aesthetics of the brick used throughout the remainder of the PUD. e. Permanent exterior signage is limited to that shown on the Approved Final Plans. Additional window signage, temporary banners and the like are restricted in accordance with the terms of the “Maintenance and Operational Restrictions” Exhibit of the development agreement and supplemental development agreements. f. All light poles must be included within curbed areas. g. All rooftop equipment must be screened from ground level view using parapet walls and all rooftop equipment must be painted to match the color of the rooftop to ensure that it is minimally visible from nearby office towers. h. Prior to issuance of any building permits, the developer must reimburse the City for all costs incurred by the City in connection with processing the applicant’s PUD, and preparation and implementation of the development agreements and associated agreements. i. In lieu of meeting certain bufferyard requirements as waived in Paragraph 3l above, the developer shall donate 225 plant units to the City in the form of twenty 2-1/2” canopy trees by June 1, 1997 for use on nearby lands to provide screening of the project. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Page 10 Title: Park Place Plaza Planned Unit Development Minor Amendment - Costco Expansion j. The subsequent phase of the PUD is approved in concept only as including 110,000 square feet of gross retail building area, 495 parking spaces and 55 proof of parking spaces on Lot 1. The details of the subsequent phase shall be reviewed as a minor amendment to the approved Final PUD, unless additional off-site impacts or modifications to Code or PUD requirements are anticipated, in which case, the details of the subsequent phase shall be reviewed as a major amendment. In either case, the City Council reserves the right to hold a public hearing regarding the subsequent phase. The subsequent phase shall require amendment to the development agreement and/or supplemental development agreement for Lot 1. k. No administrative subdivision of any property within the PUD shall be granted due to the interrelatedness of the PUD, plat, and Approved Final Plans. l. The developer and/or property owner shall dedicate, at no expense to the City, any right- of-way which may be necessary and required in the future to facilitate improvements at the intersection of 16th Street and Zarthan Avenue and/or to provide access from Cedar Lake Road into the PUD. Developer and/or property owner shall be responsible for the costs associated with these potential future improvements based upon the benefit to the project and/or the demands the project has placed on the roadway system. Any such improvements would require a major amendment to the Approved Final Plans for the PUD m. The developer and/or owner shall obtain all necessary permits to complete any further required environmental remediation of the site and undertake said remediation pursuant to local, state and federal regulations, as applicable. n. The developer shall receive all other necessary permits and approvals from the City including, but not limited to sanitary sewer, water tapping permit, demolition permit, building permits, and erosion control permit. o. The developer shall obtain approval by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District as well as any other approvals required by state and federal agencies, including the required Indirect Source Permit, and the developer shall comply with all conditions of said approvals and permits. p. The Final Plat shall be submitted to the County for recording prior to initiating any site work relating to construction of the PUD project; evidence of filing of the final plat or other assurances pertaining to required easements shall be presented to the City prior to issuance of any permits other than demolition and associated temporary noise permits. q. The Preliminary and Final Plat are inherent components of the Preliminary and Final PUD approvals and are subject to the conditions of Preliminary and Final PUD approval and the Approved Final Plans. Access to the platted properties shall be limited to the means provided in the Approved Final Plans. r. No certificate of occupancy for any building in the PUD shall be issued until all the circulation drives and internal sidewalks throughout the PUD and all the improvements, other than landscaping and wear coat of asphalt, for that building’s lot, have been installed and accepted by the City. All landscaping on the lot shall be completed within one (1) year from the date the certificate of occupancy is issued. s. The general public shall have the right to utilize the internal sidewalks for pedestrian access, including walking bicycles, through the PUD property and for access to the outdoor seating plaza, which shall remain available to the general public in perpetuity for passive recreational use that is not disruptive to the operation of the shopping center. No provision of the reciprocal easement and operations agreement shall be interpreted as overriding this requirement. t. The Approved Final Plan Exhibits may be revised to include a 4,450 square feet Arby’s restaurant on Lot 4 in accordance with the plans reviewed by the Planning Commission on May 1, 1996, and further revised as follows: to clarify building materials; to ensure that City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Page 11 Title: Park Place Plaza Planned Unit Development Minor Amendment - Costco Expansion building materials match materials used throughout the remainder of the development; and to reduce the width of the metal door on the rear elevation to a maximum of 8 feet. u. The obligations and conditions herein imposed on the developer by this Final PUD shall also apply to any property owner, successor or assign. v. The City may enforce any provision of this resolution in the same manner as provided for a violation of the City’s Zoning Ordinance and/or as provided in the development agreement or supplemental development agreements. 5. The Final PUD shall be amended on October 22, 1996 to incorporate all of the preceding conditions and add the following condition: a. The height of the future Retail 1 tenant space at 5680 Cedar Lake Road may be reduced from 30’8” to not less than 20’0”. 6. The Final PUD shall be amended on January 6, 1997 to incorporate all of the preceding conditions and add the following condition: a. The rear door configuration in the tenant space on the south end of the 1650 Park Place Boulevard building (Bruegger’s Bagels) is revised in accordance with Exhibit A5.1 - Exterior Elevations dated 12-23-96 7. The Final PUD shall be amended on March 17, 1997 to incorporate all of the preceding conditions and add the following conditions: a. The building at 1690 Park Place Boulevard (Arby’s) may utilize neon lighting in accordance with Exhibits A4.1, A4.2 and A4.3, Arby’s Exterior Elevations provided said exhibit and assent form are signed by Franchise Associates, Inc. b. The Landscape Plan may be revised in accordance with Exhibit L.1, Landscape Plan revised 2/28/97 and stamped received 3/3/97 provided the following conditions are met. i) A revised Grading Plan that accurately reflects the proposed retention of existing berms shall be submitted and approved by the City Engineer and Zoning Administrator. The Zoning Administrator shall ensure that the plan meets requirements relating to minimum berm heights adjacent to truck circulation areas. ii) Prior to implementing the changes, Ryan Construction Company, Inc. and the current fee owner of 1625 Zarthan Avenue must sign the Assent form and revised exhibits. 8. The Final PUD shall be amended on January 5, 1998 to incorporate all of the preceding conditions and add the following conditions: a. An Office-Max sign may be installed on the east facade of the building located at 5600 Cedar Lake Road (Office-Max) in the location shown on the Exhibit A3.1 Elevation. b. Prior to issuance of a sign permit, Ryan Construction Company, Inc. and Office Max must sign the Assent Form and revised exhibit. 9. The Final PUD shall be amended on April 3, 2000 to incorporate all of the preceding conditions, find no need for a new EAW, and add the following conditions: a. The Costco site (Lots 1 and 8) shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with the official exhibits, which shall be amended to address the following conditions: (Amended on July 15, 2002 by Condition 12.a.) i) The plans shall be amended as determined necessary by the Director of Public Works to show dedication of right-of-way near 16th/Zarthan as anticipated in the original development agreement sketch. Landscape plans shall be amended as necessary and approved by the Zoning Administrator to accommodate future improvements to this intersection while preserving existing berming/screening to the extent feasible. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Page 12 Title: Park Place Plaza Planned Unit Development Minor Amendment - Costco Expansion ii) The plans shall be amended to include proof of parking in excess of minimum requirements as approved by the Zoning Administrator. If excess proof of parking is shown, details of the proposed curb cuts and effects on existing landscaping shall be submitted and approved by the Zoning Administrator. iii) Elevation drawings shall be amended to show screen wall heights of 12 feet as measured from the main service drive elevation unless evidence is approved by the Zoning Administrator that the proposed heights will adequately screen service vehicles. iv) Elevation drawings and sign details shall be amended to comply with ordinance requirements unless a variance for proposed signage has been approved. b. Prior to beginning any site work, the following conditions shall be met: i) A copy of the required Watershed District permit shall be submitted to the City. ii) An erosion and sediment control plan shall be submitted and approved by Public Works. iii) A letter from the MPCA shall confirm no need for a new ISP based upon the final traffic study by SRF. iv) The official exhibits and assent form shall be signed by the applicant, owner, and City. c. Costco shall adhere to the restrictions on construction times and routes as included in the final PUD approval for Park Place Plaza except that additional restrictions may be imposed as necessary to prevent conflicts with customers during peak restaurant times. d. Costco shall adhere to restrictions on temporary signage as included in the Final PUD approval for Park Place Plaza. e. Prior to issuance of a building permit, which may impose additional restrictions, the following conditions shall be met: i) The development agreement shall be amended and executed and shall address, at a minimum, land dedication, design, construction, financial sureties for on- and off- site improvements, and maintenance. ii) A revised light distribution plan, landscape irrigation plan, and all building material samples and colors shall be submitted and approved by the Zoning Administrator. f. Prior to issuance of an Occupancy Permit, the following conditions shall be met: i) The required traffic improvements at 16th Street and the main access drive, including installation of a traffic signal paid for by the applicant, shall be complete and operational; the applicant shall also pay its share of a traffic signal at 16th and Zarthan, which may be installed at a later date. ii) The entire PUD site shall be found to be in compliance with the conditions of final PUD approval, or a Letter of Credit shall be submitted in the amount of 125% of the cost of any outstanding improvements, including but not limited to completion of improvements near the intersection of Park Place Boulevard and 16th Street, public transit improvements on 16th Street as approved by Metro Transit, and all conditions of the final PUD resolution and executed development agreement. g. Costco shall adhere to restrictions on delivery and garbage service hours and routes as included in the final PUD approval for Park Place Plaza except that additional restrictions on garbage service may be imposed on Costco as necessary to prevent conflicts with customers during peak restaurant hours. h. All sidewalks throughout the PUD site shall be maintained in a clear, walkable condition at all times during which one or more buildings within the PUD are open to the public. 10. The Final PUD shall be amended on November 6, 2000 to incorporate all of the preceding conditions and add the following condition: City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Page 13 Title: Park Place Plaza Planned Unit Development Minor Amendment - Costco Expansion a. Temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be issued prior to the signal at 16th and the main access drive being operational provided Costco installs a stop sign at the exit to 16th Street and employs off-duty police officers to direct traffic from the date of opening until such time as the traffic signal is operational or the City agrees it is no longer necessary. 11. The final PUD shall be amended on August 20, 2001 to incorporate all of the preceding conditions and add the following conditions: a. The Costco fueling facility site (Lot 9) shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with the official exhibits which shall be amended to address condition 11.f.iv. Previously approved official exhibits for Lots 1, 2 and 8 shall be amended to include traffic improvements noted in condition 11.g. b. Costco shall adhere to the Fire Department’s requirements for the fueling facility including: i) An employee must be available on-site while the fueling station is open. ii) A key-actuated manual reset switch shall be installed inside the attendant building. iii) A fire department access key box shall be installed on the exterior of the attendant building. iv) Instructions shall be provided in English and Spanish. v) Spill control equipment and supplies to contain and dispose of a 30-gallon (150% of customer limit) fuel spill. Include storm drain covers, absorbent materials, containers and tools. Protective clothing and equipment to be provided for trained attendants. vi) Dispensing nozzles shall be UL 842 listed. vii) One 40-B:C fire extinguisher shall be located outside the attendant building with a cabinet tamper switch to automatically activate emergency shut-off controls. c. Prior to beginning any site work, the following conditions shall be met: i) A copy of the required Watershed District permit or letter from the Watershed District indicating no need for a permit shall be submitted to the City. ii) An erosion and sediment control plan shall be submitted and approved by Public Works. iii) The MPCA shall confirm that an ISP amendment is not necessary. d. Costco shall adhere to the restrictions on construction times and routes as included in the final PUD approval for Park Place Plaza except that additional restrictions may be imposed as necessary to prevent conflicts with customers during peak restaurant times. e. Costco shall adhere to restrictions on temporary signage as included in the Final PUD approval for Park Place Plaza. f. Prior to issuance of a building permit, which may impose additional restrictions, the following conditions shall be met: i) The development agreement shall be amended and executed and shall address, at a minimum, design, construction, financial sureties for on-site improvements, including a letter of credit for 125% of the required internal traffic improvements, and maintenance. ii) A dimensional signage plan, landscape irrigation plan, and all building material samples and colors shall be submitted and approved by the Zoning Administrator. iii) All lights shall be completely recessed in the canopy. iv) Revised site and landscaping plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Zoning Supervisor showing the curb locations around the gasoline storage tanks and the reduced landscaping island. g. Prior to issuance of a permanent Occupancy Permit for the Costco warehouse facility or temporary Occupancy permit for the fueling facility, the entire PUD site shall be found to be in compliance with the conditions of final PUD approval, the applicant shall implement City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Page 14 Title: Park Place Plaza Planned Unit Development Minor Amendment - Costco Expansion traffic improvements recommended by SRF for the internal Costco warehouse intersection and eliminate three internal access points to Home Depot as shown on TD & A Layout 3, and shall change the sign at the 16th Street customer entrance to direct service vehicles to the 16th Street service drive. h. Service trucks shall use the service entrance on 16th Street and shall be prohibited from using Zarthan Avenue between Cedar Lake Road and 16th Street and shall be limited to servicing the fueling facility between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. on weekdays and 9:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. on weekends and holidays and as recommended by the traffic study. i. Violation of any condition of PUD approval, including these amendments, shall result in a fine of $750 per day. 12. The final PUD shall be amended (Case No. 02-38-PUD) on July 15, 2002 to incorporate all of the preceding conditions and add the following conditions: a. The Costco warehouse building site (Lot 1) shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with the official exhibits, which shall be amended as approved by the Zoning Administrator to provide an accessible sidewalk and convenient stair location. (Amends Condition 9.a.). b. Prior to issuance of a building permit, which may impose additional conditions, the following conditions shall be met: i) The official exhibits and assent form shall be signed by the applicant/owners. ii) The development agreement shall be amended if necessary, as determined by the City Attorney. iii) An additional letter of credit shall be submitted for 125% of the cost of the site improvements. iv) Building material samples and colors shall be submitted and approved by the Zoning Administrator. c. Costco shall adhere to the restrictions on construction times and routes as included in the final PUD approval for Park Place Plaza except that additional restrictions may be imposed as necessary to prevent conflicts with customers during peak restaurant times. d. Prior to issuance of an occupancy permit for the liquor store addition, the applicant shall submit an electronic file and print and reproducible copy of the plat and as-built drawings for the PUD site. In the event that any signal arms are found to be on private property, appropriate easements shall be recorded against the private property. e. Violation of any condition of PUD approval, including these amendments, shall result in a fine of $750 per day. 13. The final PUD shall be amended (Case No. 04-70-PUD) on March 7, 2005 to incorporate all of the preceding conditions and add the following conditions: a. The Home Depot garden center 5,764 square foot addition shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with the official exhibits. b. The following traffic improvements are shown on official exhibits and implemented: i) The 3-way stop intersection on the main drive aisle at the entrance of Costco is changed to a 4-way stop intersection. All stop signs at this intersection are changed to standard sized signs. ii) A new right-turn lane from the main drive aisle into Costco is constructed, and a new right turn lane (directing traffic north) is also constructed. iii) Stop signs at the eastern 4-way stop of the main drive aisle are changed to standard sized sign for better driver recognition. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Page 15 Title: Park Place Plaza Planned Unit Development Minor Amendment - Costco Expansion c. Landscaping shall be installed according to the submitted landscape plan, with additional tall grass plantings along the banks of storm pond #1. All materials must be approved by the City’s Environmental Coordinator. d. Bike racks in the area must be moved and/or replaced in another location on the Home Depot site. e. No outdoor storage is allowed; outdoor merchandise is allowed on sidewalk areas only, in accordance with the City’s Zoning Ordinance. f. Home Depot must repair or replace the sidewalk if damage occurs during construction of the garden center addition. g. All requirements of the City Engineer must be met. h. Prior to issuance of a building permit, which may impose additional conditions, the following conditions shall be met: i) The official exhibits and assent form shall be signed by the applicant/owners. ii) The development agreement shall be amended if necessary, as determined by the City Attorney. iii) An additional letter of credit shall be submitted for 125% of the cost of the site improvements. 14. The final PUD shall be amended (Case No. 13-21-PUD) on June 17, 2013, to incorporate all of the preceding conditions and add the following conditions: a. Prior to the beginning of work, the following conditions shall be met: i) The official exhibits and assent form shall be signed by the applicant/owners. ii) The development agreement shall be amended if necessary, as determined by the City Attorney. iii) An additional letter of credit shall be submitted for 125% of the cost of the site improvements. iv) An agreement assigning responsibility for maintenance of the sidewalk, including snow removal, to Costco shall be submitted to the City for review and approval by the City Attorney. v) An agreement that guarantees parking access for Lot 2, Block 1, Park Place Plaza (Home Depot) to 59 parking spaces on Lot 1, Block 1, Park Place Plaza (Costco) shall be submitted to the City for review and approval by the City Attorney. The agreement shall be recorded with Hennepin County and proof of the recording submitted to the City. b. The Costco Warehouse and Home Depot parking lots shall be developed, used, and maintained in accordance with the official exhibits. 15. The final PUD shall be amended (Case No. 13-26-PUD) on July 15, 2013, to incorporate all of the preceding conditions and add the following conditions: a. Prior to the beginning of work, the following conditions shall be met: i) The official exhibits and assent form shall be signed by the applicant/owner. ii) An additional letter of credit shall be submitted for 125% of the cost of the site improvements. iii) All necessary permits, including but not limited to building, sign, and erosion and sediment control, shall be obtained. b. The Costco Warehouse fueling facility (Lot 9) shall be developed, used, and maintained in accordance with the official exhibits. c. The City Clerk is instructed to record certified copies of this resolution in the Office of the Hennepin County Register of Deeds or Registrar of Titles as the case may be. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Page 16 Title: Park Place Plaza Planned Unit Development Minor Amendment - Costco Expansion 16. The final PUD shall be amended (Case No. 16-35-PUD) on September 6, 2016, to incorporate all of the preceding conditions and add the following conditions: a. The Official Exhibits for Costco be amended to include the site plan and landscaping plan approved under this PUD amendment. b. The Official Exhibits be signed prior to issuance of a building permit. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council September 6, 2016 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Park Place Plaza Planned Unit Development Minor Amendment - Costco Expansion Page 17 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Park Place Plaza Planned Unit Development Minor Amendment - Costco Expansion Page 18 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Park Place Plaza Planned Unit Development Minor Amendment - Costco Expansion Page 19 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Park Place Plaza Planned Unit Development Minor Amendment - Costco Expansion Page 20 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Park Place Plaza Planned Unit Development Minor Amendment - Costco Expansion Page 21 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Park Place Plaza Planned Unit Development Minor Amendment - Costco Expansion Page 22 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Park Place Plaza Planned Unit Development Minor Amendment - Costco ExpansionPage 23 Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: September 6, 2016 Action Agenda Item: 4l EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Authorize Execution of an Agreement for a Records Management System RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to authorize staff to enter into an agreement with Cities Digital, Inc. to acquire the rights to use a records management software application. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Is moving to a new records management system supportive of Council goals for easier and public access to city records, their long-term archival storage, and streamlined workflows? SUMMARY: The City of St. Louis Park acquired its current electronic records management (RM) system in 1995. It was acquired at that time primarily to replace the microfilm process used to store archival records being used since 1978. Due to capabilities in newer RM systems, a staff RM Task Force was brought together to develop specifications for the city’s next records management system. City staff issued an RFP earlier this year and received five proposals for a replacement records management system. As a result of vetting the proposals and review of finalists by the same staff task force, the unanimous preference was to pursue an agreement with Cities Digital, Inc. for use of its recommended Laserfiche Rio records management system. Some highlights of Laserfiche Rio functionality include: Full system use for up to 100 staff with unlimited records retrieval capability for all staff. Public access to records (public records made available over time) stored on Laserfiche Rio. This includes unlimited simultaneous access. Full user security to allow both staff and public access to only appropriate records. Electronic signature capability for official documents (e.g., resolutions, ordinances, contracts), eliminating the need for in-person signature. Integration with other software applications to facilitate workflow (e.g., Accounts Payable, mapping systems, Permits and Property Records Systems, and Electronic Plan Review). Records search capability, and integration of search capability with new web site search. The City Attorney has reviewed and approved both the RFP process and agreement. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The 2016 Capital Improvement Program includes $215,000 for this project. The amount of the recommended purchases from Cities Digital is $201,480 ($174,800 for system and maintenance components, plus $26,680 for digital conversion of City Clerk microfilm records). Official City Council documents are Phase 1 of this project so they can be more easily searched and retrieved by the public, Council, and staff. VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged community. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: None. Prepared by: Clint Pires, Chief Information Officer Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Approved by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: September 6, 2016 Consent Agenda Item: 4m EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Retirement Recognition Resolution for Police Officer Terry Reuvers RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution to recognize Police Officer Terry Reuvers for his 30 years of service to the City of St. Louis Park. POLICY CONSIDERATION: None at this time. SUMMARY: City policy states that employees who retire or resign in good standing with over 20 years of service will be presented with a resolution from the Mayor, City Manager and City Council. This consent item will officially adopt the resolution that honors Terry for his years of service. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution Prepared by: Ali Timpone, HR Coordinator Approved by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4m) Page 2 Title: Retirement Recognition Resolution for Police Officer Terry Reuvers RESOLUTION NO. 16-____ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA, RECOGNIZING THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF AND EXPRESSING APPRECIATION TO POLICE OFFICER TERRY REUVERS WHEREAS, Terry Reuvers began his employment with the City of St. Louis Park over 30 years ago on April 28, 1986; and WHEREAS, Terry has served in the positions of Patrol Officer, Field Training Officer, School Liaison Officer, Drug Task Force Officer, and SWAT Officer; and WHEREAS, Terry has furthered his personal growth and education by recently receiving a Master’s Degree in Kinesiology; and WHEREAS, Terry has future plans to assist the policing profession by participating in an upcoming cardiovascular health study for police officers; and WHEREAS, Terry will continue in retirement to follow his passion for physical fitness through coaching and teaching and will continue to remain active in competitive triathlon events as well as enjoy the love of outdoors, fishing and camping with his family; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, by this resolution and public record, would like to thank Terry Reuvers for his great contributions and 30 years of dedicated service to the City of St. Louis Park and wish him the best in his retirement. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council September 6, 2016 City Manager Mayor Attest: City Clerk Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: September 6, 2016 Consent Agenda Item: 4n EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Special Assessment – Sewer Service Line Repair at 3165 Texas Avenue South RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution authorizing the special assessment for the repair of the sewer service line at 3165 Texas Avenue South, St. Louis Park, MN P.I.D. 17-117-21-23-0002. POLICY CONSIDERATION: The proposed action is consistent with policy previously established by the City Council. SUMMARY: Ryan Koller, owner of the single family residence at 3165 Texas Avenue South, has requested the City to authorize the repair of the sewer service line for his/her home and assess the cost against the property in accordance with the City’s special assessment policy. The City requires the repair of service lines to promote the general public health, safety and welfare within the community. The special assessment policy for the repair or replacement of water or sewer service lines for existing homes was adopted by the City Council in 1996. This program was put into place because sometimes property owners face financial hardships when emergency repairs like this are unexpectedly required. Plans and permits for this service line repair work were completed, submitted, and approved by City staff. The property owner hired a contractor and repaired the sewer service line in compliance with current codes and regulations. Based on the completed work, this repair qualifies for the City’s special assessment program. The property owner has petitioned the City to authorize the sewer service line repair and special assess the cost of the repair. The total eligible cost of the repair has been determined to be $5,995. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The City has funds in place to finance the cost of this special assessment. VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged community. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution Prepared by: Jay Hall, Utility Superintendent Reviewed by: Mark Hanson, Public Works Superintendent Patricia A. Sulander, Accountant Cynthia S. Walsh, Director of Operations and Recreation Approved by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4n) Page 2 Title: Special Assessment – Sewer Service Line Repair at 3165 Texas Avenue South RESOLUTION NO. 16-____ RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE REPAIR OF THE SEWER SERVICE LINE AT 3165 TEXAS AVENUE SOUTH, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN P.I.D. 17-117-21-23-0002 WHEREAS, the Property Owner at 3165 Texas Avenue South, has petitioned the City of St. Louis Park to authorize a special assessment for the repair of the sewer service line for the single family residence located at 3165 Texas Avenue South, and WHEREAS, the Property Owner has agreed to waive the right to a public hearing, right of notice and right of appeal pursuant to Minnesota Statute, Chapter 429; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park has received a report from the Utility Superintendent related to the repair of the sewer service line. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, that: 1. The petition from the Property Owner requesting the approval and special assessment for the sewer service line repair is hereby accepted. 2. The sewer service line repair that was done in conformance with the plans and specifications approved by the Public Works Department and Department of Inspections is hereby accepted. 3. The total cost for the repair of the sewer service line is accepted at $5,995. 4. The Property Owner has agreed to waive the right to a public hearing, notice and appeal from the special assessment; whether provided by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, or by other statutes, or by ordinance, City Charter, the constitution, or common law. 5. The Property Owner has agreed to pay the City for the total cost of the above improvements through a special assessment over a ten (10) year period at the interest rate of 4.00%. 6. The Property Owner has executed an agreement with the City and all other documents necessary to implement the repair of the sewer service line and the special assessment of all costs associated therewith. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council September 6, 2016 City Manager Mayor Attest: City Clerk Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: September 6, 2016 Consent Agenda Item: 4o OFFICIAL MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA AUGUST 3, 2016 – 6:00 p.m. COUNCIL CHAMBERS MEMBERS PRESENT: Lynne Carper, Torrey Kanne, Richard Person, Carl Robertson MEMBERS ABSENT: Claudia Johnston-Madison, Lisa Peilen, Joe Tatalovich Ethan Rickert (youth member) STAFF PRESENT: 1. Call to Order – Roll Call 2. Approval of Minutes of July 20, 2016 Commissioner Carper made a motion approving the minutes of July 20, 2016. Commissioner Robertson seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 4-0. 3. Public Hearings A. Rezoning from High Density Multifamily Residence to Office Location: 8001 State Highway 7 Applicant: 8001 Highway Seven, LLC (Steven Thiel) Case No.: 16-29-Z Gary Morrison, Assistant Zoning Administrator, presented the staff report. The application has been made to rezone the property to Office for the purpose of increasing the amount of signage the property is allowed. The applicant would like to construct a monument sign that will increase the tenants’ visibility and exposure to traffic on Highway 7. Mr. Morrison provided background on the site and explained how the site is suitable for office development. Commissioner Kanne asked if the proposed sign would have lighting. Mr. Morrison stated that the sign very likely would be back lit. The standard signage ordinance conditions would apply to it and it could be back lit or electronic. Commissioner Person opened the public hearing. As no one was present wishing to speak he closed the public hearing. Commissioner Robertson made a motion recommending approval to rezone the property from R-C High-Density Multiple-Family Residential to O Office. Commissioner Carper seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 4-0. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4o) Page 2 Title: Planning Commission Meeting Minutes August 3, 2016 B. Plat Revision and Major Amendment to Planned Unit Development Location: 7905 Wayzata Blvd. - Arlington Row Apartments West Applicant: Melrose Company Case No.: 16-31-S, 16-33-PUD Julie Grove, Economic Development Specialist, presented the staff report. Ms. Grove explained that a major amendment to the PUD is being requested to add solar installations above carports at the site. A revision for the plat for Arlington Row Apartments West is also requested to correct a surveyor error in the previously approved plat. Commissioner Carper spoke about the PUD no longer being greater than 2 acres at one particular site. The sites are not contiguous and are separated by a block. He asked if this was unusual. Sean Walther, Planning and Zoning Supervisor, said the City Council previously approved the PUD West with less than two acres. Due to the adjustment to north property line it becomes smaller yet. The Arlington project is actually two separate PUDs and each of these are less than two acres. But they have informally been viewed, and progressed through the review process, as Phases I and Phase II of the overall Arlington Row Apartments development. Commissioner Carper said facing west from the carports there seems to be a large vegetated area. He asked for details about that area. Ms. Grove said several existing trees will be preserved and several more trees will be planted in that area. She spoke about the hillside and said the area will remain vegetated. Commissioner Carper asked if this would be maintained as green space or prairie development or if it would grow wild. Robert Cunningham, Melrose Company, applicant, said due to the significant grade change at the area it will be left natural and untouched. Commissioner Carper said unmaintained areas in the city are frequently overrun by noxious types of weeds and bushes such as buckthorn and wild garlic. He asked if that material would be removed. Mr. Cunningham stated his understanding of buckthorn is that it grows along the edges of wooded areas. They would be diligent in removing buckthorn along the edge of the woods facing the solar area. He said he has seen garlic mustard on the site but only in grassy areas, not on the slope. He said he wouldn’t spray any herbicides on the slope as he wouldn’t want to kill off any native vegetation. Removing garlic mustard on the slope would be very difficult. Commissioner Robertson asked about the efficiency of flat solar panels. Mr. Cunningham responded that the carport runs north-south on the Arlington West site. The options for the panels were flat or saw-tooth design. They chose not to do the saw- City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4o) Page 3 Title: Planning Commission Meeting Minutes August 3, 2016 tooth design as that would expose the cars under the carport to the weather from the north. He added that the panels have some translucency as solar panels let light through as well as capture light. Commissioner Person asked if they expect to ever generate excess power. Mr. Cunningham said according to the engineers, the 40 kilowatt solar installation would generate 40-45% of the electrical needs of the project. That means the project would never generate excess power in the course of a year. Commissioner Person opened the public hearing. Illson Johnson, 1319 Texas Ave. S., a 30-year resident, said the Texas/Wayzata traffic corner has been changed. She remarked that traffic and parking on Texas Ave. has already been difficult and even more so now with bike lanes. She remarked that the area is a residential area without apartments. She said she would rather see townhomes at that location. She said she is concerned about apartment resident parking. She said she hates that the development will be apartments. Commissioner Person clarified that the development has previously been approved and the current request is for an amendment regarding solar and a correction to the plat. Mr. Walther discussed the recent pavement management project along Texas Ave bike lanes were added, on-street parking was limited, and where a short right turn lane was striped to improve the overall traffic flow at the Wayzata Blvd intersection. Commissioner Robertson commented that the development is visually one of the most modest apartment developments that has come before the Commission. The apartments have a townhome look with very low density. All 52 required parking spaces will be on site. He said he doesn’t think the development will have much more impact than townhomes would have. He said he understands Ms. Johnson’s concerns but he believes the development will prove to be a respectful addition to the neighborhood. Ms. Johnson said homeowners take care of their homes and that is different from apartments and renters. She said she has concerns about parking and traffic due to apartment residents and visitors. As no one else was present wishing to speak, Commissioner Person closed the public hearing. Commissioner Carper said the requests are straightforward. He made a motion recommending approval of the revision to the Arlington Row West Plat Major Amendment and approval of the Major Amendment to the Arlington Row West PUD. Commissioner Kanne seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 4-0. C. Major Amendment to Planned Unit Development Location: 7705 Wayzata Blvd. – Arlington Row Apartments East Applicant: Melrose Company Case No.: 16-32-PUD City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4o) Page 4 Title: Planning Commission Meeting Minutes August 3, 2016 Julie Grove, Economic Development Specialist, presented the staff report. She explained that the request is for solar panel installations above carports, designed in the same way as carports for Arlington Row Apartments West. Carports of Phase II, East site, are split in two locations on the east side of the parking lot. She reviewed the setbacks and height of the carport structure. She said due to installation of carports two of the stalls will be compact stalls. She reviewed landscaping changes. Commissioner Carper asked about lack of screening to obscure the concrete pillars of the parking structure from residents across the street. He asked about the exposed row of parking on the north side. He asked why carports wouldn’t appear on that side. Ms. Grove responded that the east side of the property will be screened with evergreens. On the south, solar panels will be visible especially in the winter. Additional trees along 13th Lane will provide screening in the summer. The north side of the building wasn’t proposed for solar because of shading from the building itself. Robert Cunningham, Melrose Company, said deliberate placement of solar panels was considered to try to get as much solar power as possible during winter months. Some of the structure will be visible to residents to the south. There is a good distance between the Arlington property line and the residential front yards. There will be substantial shrubbery and trees lining the 13th Lane elevation. Commissioner Robertson asked about the location of accessible parking spaces. Mr. Cunningham said the accessible spaces were not moved to the solar carport areas. They remain closest to the main entrance of the building and accessible building units. He said he could look at moving those spaces to the carport area. Commissioner Robertson also asked if the applicant would consider expanding the north solar array further west so that more solar power could be generated. Mr. Cunningham stated the building may provide too much shading but that he would have his architect analyze it and work with staff if it is feasible. Commissioner Person opened the public hearing. As no one was present wishing to speak, he closed the public hearing. Commissioner Robertson made a motion to recommending approval of the Major Amendment to the Arlington Row East PUD. Commissioner Carper seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 4-0. 4. Other Business: None 5. Communications: None 6. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 7:00 p.m. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 4o) Page 5 Title: Planning Commission Meeting Minutes August 3, 2016 STUDY SESSION The study session began at 7:05 p.m. 1. Floodplain District Zoning Map and Floodplain Ordinance Amendments Sean Walther, Planning and Zoning Supervisor, reviewed the proposed amendments which are required to comply with new and updated Federal regulations with regards to the National Flood Insurance Program. 2. Proposed Zoning Text Amendments for Fences Gary Morrison, Assistant Zoning Administrator, reviewed the proposed amendments regarding fence materials that will be allowed and prohibited. He shared photographs of several fence material types that Commissioners Carper and Robertson suggested the Commission should consider. Based on the discussion, staff will present the changes to Commissioners at an upcoming regular meeting for a formal recommendation to City Council. 3. Gardens Discussion Commissioners discussed the possibilities of either requiring edible gardens or community gardens to be included in designed outdoor recreation areas (DORA) of new developments, or providing reductions in the amount of DORA required if these are provided. The commissioners concluded that no change was needed to the city’s regulations in regard to gardens and DORA requirements. Such gardens will still be welcomed and encouraged as part of an overall landscaping and DORA plan in new developments. The study session was adjourned at 8:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Nancy Sells Recording Secretary Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: September 6, 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: First Reading of Ordinance Imposing a Franchise Fee on Northern States Power Co. (dba Xcel Energy) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Mayor to open the public hearing, solicit comments, and to close the public hearing. Motion to approve first reading of an ordinance imposing a franchise fee on Xcel Energy and set second reading for September 19, 2016. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish to increase the franchise fees for Xcel Energy to assist in funding the City’s Pavement Management Program? SUMMARY: The City has imposed franchise fees on Xcel Energy since 2004. Keeping with Council direction of reviewing the fees every other year, the fees were increased to $3.25/month for a residential customer in 2015. Staff recommends the fees are increased to $4.00/ month for a residential customer in 2017. Staff is proposing, and Xcel supports, that their franchise fee is consistent with the franchise fee imposed on CenterPoint Energy. Staff recommends Council approve the 1st Reading this evening and set the 2nd reading for September 19, 2016. Based on this schedule, the franchise fee increase would be effective February 1, 2017. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The City’s Pavement Management Program is currently funded by franchise fee revenues, collected by both Xcel and CenterPoint. Based on the current fees, total franchise fees generate approximately $2.3 million annually (CenterPoint - $889,524; Xcel - $1,420,116). The proposed increase in the Xcel franchise fee would add approximately $433,791 in additional annual revenue to the Pavement Management Program, and provide greater sustainability into the future. By implementing this proposed franchise fee increase for 2017, St. Louis Park would still be competitive with other cities in the area. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion Franchise Ordinance Franchise Fee Ordinance Prepared by: Debra Heiser, Engineering Director Reviewed by: Tim Simon, Chief Financial Officer Approved by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director Public Hearing Agenda Item: 6a City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 6a) Page 2 Title: First Reading of Ordinance Imposing a Franchise Fee on Northern States Power Co. (dba Xcel Energy) DISCUSSION BACKGROUND: In 1993 the City adopted an ordinance granting Northern States Power Company (D/B/A Xcel Energy) an electrical services utility franchise in the city. That ordinance allowed the City to impose a franchise fee on Xcel. The Franchise ordinance expires at the end of this year. The City has been working with Xcel Energy on a new ordinance since 2013. The new ordinance has been reviewed by the City and Xcel and is attached. The franchise ordinance has a 20 year term. Franchise fees in St. Louis Park are used in their entirety to assist in funding the cost the City experiences to maintain, reconstruct and repair the street system via the City’s Pavement Management Program. On July 18, 2016, the City Council approved an updated assessment policy that shifted funding of the majority of public improvement to franchise fees. In general, the City Council’s direction for the public improvements discussed as a part of this policy was “If there is a public purpose for the infrastructure, the City should fund construction.” The proposed fee increase will fund all local street and alley construction projects. The Council has historically considered franchise fee adjustments every other year and based on that schedule 2017 and 2019 would be the years to consider adjusting the fees. In the long range financial plan the current estimates reflect a $0.75 increase per utility/per month for single family home in 2017 and $0.75 again in 2019 to fully fund the pavement management program. Beyond 2019, we have not programmed any changes but will review annually as part of the CIP process. This plan reflects the 10 year CIP assuming no assessments for all local street and alley construction projects. The franchise fee is essentially a user fee collected from customers on their utility bill and paid to Xcel. The utility then functions essentially as a pass through entity with the franchise fee revenue being remitted to the City of St. Louis Park. PRESENT CONSIDERATIONS: As discussed with the Council most recently on July 18, 2016, staff is proposing a $0.75/month fee increase to residential customers for 2017 to continue funding the Pavement Management Program. Based on customer class, customers would see increases ranging from $0.75/month per utility for residential customers to $40.00/month per utility for large commercial/industrial customers (please see attachment - Franchise Fee Estimate). Residential customers make up approximately 90% of the total customers. It was desired by the City to adopt an ordinance that would allow for automatic annual or alternating year fee increases, but that is not allowed by the Public Utilities Commission. The City also imposes an equivalent franchise fee on CenterPoint Energy. Staff is also proposing (under separate action) to increase CenterPoint’s current basic franchise fee by $0.75/month per utility for residential customers. Per the City’s Long Range Financial Management Plan, by increasing franchise fees in 2017, it is projected that the Pavement Management Program could be funded entirely by franchise fees making the fund sustainable in the long-term based on projected expenditures and no significant changes to the program. Based on recent discussions with Xcel staff, they do not oppose this proposed increase in the franchise fee. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 6a) Page 3 Title: First Reading of Ordinance Imposing a Franchise Fee on Northern States Power Co. (dba Xcel Energy) NEXT STEPS: The following steps outline the adoption process to be followed: 1. Ordinances must contain all the terms and conditions of the franchise 2. Franchise ordinances require a public hearing 3. At least seven days must pass between first reading (public hearing) and 2nd reading 4. At second reading motion will be “Motion to adopt the ordinance, approve the summary and authorize summary publication” 5. Ordinance becomes effective 90 days following adoption Based on the above process, staff has developed the following steps and schedule for adopting the franchise ordinance and franchise fee ordinance: First Reading of Ordinances 09/06/2016 Second Reading of Ordinance 09/19/2016 60 days after notifying utilities Ordinance takes effect 02/01/2017 90 days after 2nd reading Utilities begin collection 02/01/2017 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 6a) Page 4 Title: First Reading of Ordinance Imposing a Franchise Fee on Northern States Power Co. (dba Xcel Energy) City of St Louis Park, Minnesota Franchise Fee Estimate Variable Increases Proposed for 2017 Xcel - Electric CUSTOMER CLASS AVERAGE MONTHLY CUSTOMER COUNT ESTIMATED ANNUAL FRANCHISE FEE REVENUES 2017 New Revenue Estimate Current MONTHLY FLAT FEE 2017 New Fee Proposal Residential 22,242 $867,438 $1,067,616 $3.25 $4.00 Small C&I – Non-Demand 1,350 $105,300 $137,700 $6.50 $8.50 Small C&I – Demand 699 $251,640 $377,460 $30.00 $45.00 Large C&I 149 $187,740 $259,260 $105.00 $145.00 Public Street Lighting 75 $0 $0 Municipal Pumping – Non-Demand 21 $1,518 $2,151 $6.00 $8.50 Municipal Pumping – Demand 18 $6,480 $9,720 $30.00 $45.00 Total 24,554 $1,420,116 $1,853,907 Net Increase $433,791 CenterPoint - Heating Gas CUSTOMER CLASS AVERAGE MONTHLY CUSTOMER COUNT ESTIMATED ANNUAL FRANCHISE FEE REVENUES 2017 New Revenue Estimate Current MONTHLY FLAT FEE 2017 New Fee Proposal Residential 16,382 $638,898 $786,336 $3.25 $4.00 Commercial B 407 $31,746 $41,514 $6.50 $8.50 Commercial C 519 $186,840 $280,260 $30.00 $45.00 SVDF A & B 75 $27,000 $40,500 $30.00 $45.00 LVDF 4 $5,040 $6,960 $105.00 $145.00 Total 17,387 $889,524 $1,155,570 Net Increase $266,046 Total $699,837 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 6a) Page 5 Title: First Reading of Ordinance Imposing a Franchise Fee on Northern States Power Co. (dba Xcel Energy) ORDINANCE NO. ____-16 CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A FRANCHISE TO NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY, A MINNESOTA CORPORATION, D/B/A XCEL ENERGY, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, PERMISSION TO CONSTRUCT, OPERATE, REPAIR AND MAINTAIN IN THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA, AN ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AND TRANSMISSION LINES, INCLUDING NECESSARY POLES, LINES, FIXTURES AND APPURTENANCES, FOR THE FURNISHING OF ELECTRIC ENERGY TO THE CITY, ITS INHABITANTS, AND OTHERS, AND TO USE THE PUBLIC GROUNDS AND PUBLIC WAYS OF THE CITY FOR SUCH PURPOSES. THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK DOES ORDAIN: SECTION 1. DEFINITIONS. For purposes of this Ordinance, the following capitalized terms listed in alphabetical order shall have the following meanings: 1.1 City. The City of St. Louis Park, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota. 1.2 City Utility System. Facilities used for providing public utility service owned or operated by City or agency thereof, including sanitary sewer, storm sewer, street lighting and traffic signals, and water service, but excluding facilities for providing heating, lighting or other forms of energy. 1.3 Commission. The Minnesota Public Utilities Commission, or any successor agency or agencies, including an agency of the federal government, which preempts all, or part of the authority to regulate electric retail rates now vested in the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission. 1.4 Company. Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation, d/b/a Xcel Energy, its successors and assigns. 1.5 Electric Facilities. Electric transmission and distribution towers, poles, lines, guys, anchors, conduits, fixtures, and necessary appurtenances owned or operated by Company for the purpose of providing electric energy for public use. 1.6 Notice. A written notice served by one party on the other party referencing one or more provisions of this Ordinance. Notice to Company shall be mailed to the General Counsel, 414 Nicollet Mall, 5th Floor, Minneapolis, MN 55401. Notice to the City shall be mailed to the City Administrator, City Hall, 5005 Minnetonka Boulevard, St. Louis Park, MN 55416. Either party may change its respective address for the purpose of this Ordinance by written notice to the other party. 1.7 Public Ground. Land owned by the City for park, open space or similar purpose, which is held for use in common by the public. 1.8 Public Way. Any street, alley, walkway or other public right-of-way within the City. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 6a) Page 6 Title: First Reading of Ordinance Imposing a Franchise Fee on Northern States Power Co. (dba Xcel Energy) SECTION 2. ADOPTION OF FRANCHISE. 2.1 Grant of Franchise. City hereby grants Company, for a period of 20 years from the date passed and approved by the City, the right to transmit and furnish electric energy for light, heat, power and other purposes for public and private use within and through the limits of the City as its boundaries now exist or as they may be extended in the future. For these purposes, Company may construct, operate, repair and maintain Electric Facilities in, on, over, under and across the Public Grounds and Public Ways of City, subject to the provisions of this franchise. Company may do all reasonable things necessary or customary to accomplish these purposes, subject, however, to such reasonable regulations as may be imposed by the City pursuant to ordinance and to the further provisions of this franchise. 2.2 Effective Date; Written Acceptance. This franchise agreement shall be in force and effect from and after passage of this Ordinance, its acceptance by Company, and its publication as required by law. The City, by Council resolution, may revoke this franchise agreement if Company does not file a written acceptance with the City within 90 days after publication. 2.3 Service and Rates. The service to be provided and the rates to be charged by Company for electric service in City are subject to the jurisdiction of the Commission. The area within the City in which Company may provide electric service is subject to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 216B.40. 2.4 Publication Expense. The expense of publication of this Ordinance will be paid by City and reimbursed to City by Company. 2.5 Dispute Resolution. If either party asserts that the other party is in default in the performance of any obligation hereunder, the complaining party shall notify the other party of the default and the desired remedy. The notification shall be written. Representatives of the parties must promptly meet and attempt in good faith to negotiate a resolution of the dispute. If the dispute is not resolved within 30 days of the written notice, the parties may jointly select a mediator to facilitate further discussion. The parties will equally share the fees and expenses of this mediator. If a mediator is not used, or if the parties are unable to resolve the dispute within 30 days after first meeting with the selected mediator, either party may commence an action in District Court to interpret and enforce this franchise or for such other relief as may be permitted by law or equity for breach of contract, or either party may take any other action permitted by law. SECTION 3. LOCATION, OTHER REGULATIONS. 3.1 Location of Facilities. Electric Facilities shall be located, constructed and maintained so as not to interfere with the safety and convenience of ordinary travel along and over Public Ways and so as not to disrupt normal operation of any City Utility System previously installed therein. Electric Facilities shall be located on Public Grounds as determined by the City. Company's construction, reconstruction, operation, repair, maintenance and location of Electric Facilities shall be subject to permits if required by separate ordinance and to other reasonable regulations of the City to the extent not inconsistent with the terms of this franchise agreement. Company may abandon underground Electric Facilities in place, provided at the City’s request, Company will remove abandoned metal or concrete encased conduit interfering with a City improvement project, but only to the extent such conduit is uncovered by excavation as part of the City improvement project. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 6a) Page 7 Title: First Reading of Ordinance Imposing a Franchise Fee on Northern States Power Co. (dba Xcel Energy) 3.2 Field Locations and Mapping Information. Company shall provide field locations for its underground Electric Facilities within the City consistent with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 216D. Company shall provide current mapping information for any of its Electric Facilities in accordance with Minnesota Rules Parts 7819.4000 and 7819.4100 and other applicable state and federal laws. 3.3 Street Openings. Company shall not open or disturb any Public Ground or Public Way for any purpose without first having obtained a permit from the City, if required by a separate ordinance, for which the City may impose a reasonable fee. Permit conditions imposed on Company shall not be more burdensome than those imposed on other utilities for similar facilities or work. Company may, however, open and disturb any Public Ground or Public Way without permission from the City where an emergency exists requiring the immediate repair of Electric Facilities. In such event Company shall notify the City by telephone to the office designated by the City as soon as practicable. Not later than the second working day thereafter, Company shall obtain any required permits and pay any required fees. 3.4 Restoration. After undertaking any work requiring the opening of any Public Ground or Public Way, Company shall restore the same, including paving and its foundation, in accordance with Minnesota Rules Part 7819.1100, to as good a condition as formerly existed, and shall maintain any paved surface in good condition for two years thereafter. The work shall be completed as promptly as weather permits, and if Company shall not promptly perform and complete the work, remove all dirt, rubbish, equipment and material, and put the Public Ground or Public Way in the said condition, the City shall have, after demand to Company to cure and the passage of a reasonable period of time following the demand, but not to exceed five days, the right to make the restoration at the expense of Company. Company shall pay to the City the cost of such work done for or performed by the City. This remedy shall be in addition to any other remedy available to the City for noncompliance with this Section 3.4, but the City hereby waives any requirement for Company to post a construction performance bond, certificate of insurance, letter of credit or any other form of security or assurance that may be required, under a separate existing or future ordinance of the City, of a person or entity obtaining the City’s permission to install, replace or maintain facilities in a Public Way. 3.5 Avoid Damage to Electric Facilities. Nothing in this Ordinance relieves any person from liability arising out of the failure to exercise reasonable care to avoid damaging Electric Facilities while performing any activity. 3.6 Notice of Improvements. The City must give Company reasonable notice of plans for improvements to Public Grounds or Public Ways where the City has reason to believe that Electric Facilities may affect or be affected by the improvement. The notice must contain: (i) the nature and character of the improvements, (ii) the Public Grounds and Public Ways upon which the improvements are to be made, (iii) the extent of the improvements, (iv) the time when the City will start the work, and (v) if more than one Public Ground or Public Way is involved, the order in which the work is to proceed. The notice must be given to Company a sufficient length of time in advance of the actual commencement of the work to permit Company to make any necessary additions, alterations or repairs to its Electric Facilities. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 6a) Page 8 Title: First Reading of Ordinance Imposing a Franchise Fee on Northern States Power Co. (dba Xcel Energy) 3.7 Shared Use of Poles. Company shall make space available on its poles or towers for City fire, water utility, police or other City facilities upon terms and conditions acceptable to Company whenever such use will not interfere with the use of such poles or towers by Company, by another electric utility, by a telephone utility, or by any cable television company or other form of communication company. In addition, the City shall pay for any added cost incurred by Company because of such use by City. SECTION 4. RELOCATIONS. 4.1 Relocation of Electric Facilities in Public Ways. Company shall comply with the requirements of Minnesota Rules, Part 7819.3100 and applicable law relating to relocation of Electric Facilities in Public Ways. If a relocation is ordered within five (5) years of a prior relocation of the same Electric Facilities, which was made at Company expense, the City shall reimburse Company for non-betterment expenses on a time and material basis, provided that if a subsequent relocation is required because of the extension of a City Utility System to a previously unserved area, Company may be required to make the subsequent relocation at its expense. Nothing in this Ordinance requires Company to relocate, remove, replace or reconstruct at its own expense its Electric Facilities where such relocation, removal, replacement or reconstruction is solely for the convenience of the City and is not reasonably necessary for the construction or reconstruction of a Public Way or City Utility System or other City improvement. 4.2 Relocation of Electric Facilities in Public Ground. City may require Company, at Company’s expense, to relocate or remove its Electric Facilities from Public Ground upon a finding by City that the Electric Facilities have become or will become a substantial impairment to the existing or proposed public use of the Public Ground. 4.3 Projects with Federal Funding. Relocation, removal or rearrangement of any Company Electric Facilities made necessary because of the extension into or through City of a federally-aided highway project shall be governed by the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 161.46, as supplemented or amended. City shall not order Company to remove or relocate its Electric Facilities when a Public Way is vacated, improved or realigned for a right-of-way project or any other project which is financially subsidized in whole or in part by the Federal Government or any agency thereof, unless the reasonable non-betterment costs of such relocation are first paid to Company. But the City need not pay those portions of such for which reimbursement to it is not available. 4.4 No Waiver. The provisions of this franchise apply only to facilities constructed in reliance on a franchise from the City and shall not be construed to waive or modify any rights obtained by Company for installations within a Company right-of-way acquired by easement or prescriptive right before the applicable Public Ground or Public Way was established, or Company's rights under state or county permit. SECTION 5. TREE TRIMMING. Company may trim all trees and shrubs in the Public Grounds and Public Ways of City to the extent Company finds necessary to avoid interference with the proper construction, operation, repair and maintenance of any Electric Facilities installed hereunder, provided that Company shall save the City harmless from any liability arising therefrom, and subject to permit or other reasonable regulation by the City. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 6a) Page 9 Title: First Reading of Ordinance Imposing a Franchise Fee on Northern States Power Co. (dba Xcel Energy) SECTION 6. INDEMNIFICATION. 6.1 Indemnity of City. Company shall indemnify, keep and hold the City free and harmless from any and all liability on account of injury to persons or damage to property occasioned by the construction, maintenance, repair, inspection, the issuance of permits, or the operation of the Electric Facilities located in the Public Grounds and Public Ways. The City shall not be indemnified for losses or claims occasioned through its own negligence except for losses or claims arising out of or alleging the City's negligence as to the issuance of permits for, or inspection of, Company's plans or work. The City shall not be indemnified if the injury or damage results from the performance in a proper manner, of acts reasonably deemed hazardous by Company, and such performance is nevertheless ordered or directed by City after notice of Company's determination. 6.2 Defense of City. In the event a suit is brought against the City under circumstances where this franchise agreement to indemnify applies, Company at its sole cost and expense shall defend the City in such suit if written notice thereof is promptly given to Company within a period wherein Company is not prejudiced by lack of such notice. If Company is required to indemnify and defend, it will thereafter have control of such litigation, but Company may not settle such litigation without the consent of the City, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. This section is not, as to third parties, a waiver of any defense or immunity otherwise available to the City and Company, in defending any action on behalf of the City, shall be entitled to assert in any action every defense or immunity that the City could assert in its own behalf. This franchise shall not be interpreted to constitute a waiver by the City of any of its defenses of immunity or limitations under Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466. SECTION 7. VACATION OF PUBLIC WAYS. The City shall give Company at least two weeks prior written notice of a proposed vacation of a Public Way. Except where required for a City improvement project, the vacation of any Public Way, after the installation of Electric Facilities, shall not operate to deprive Company of its rights to operate and maintain such Electric Facilities, until the reasonable cost of relocating the same and the loss and expense resulting from such relocation is first paid to Company. In no case, however, shall City be liable to Company for failure to specifically preserve a right-of-way under Minnesota Statutes, Section 160.29. SECTION 8. CHANGE IN FORM OF GOVERNMENT. Any change in the form of government of the City shall not affect the validity of this Ordinance. Any governmental unit succeeding the City shall, without the consent of Company, succeed to all of the rights and obligations of the City provided in this Ordinance. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 6a) Page 10 Title: First Reading of Ordinance Imposing a Franchise Fee on Northern States Power Co. (dba Xcel Energy) SECTION 9. FRANCHISE FEE. 9.1 Fee Schedule. During the term of the franchise hereby granted, the City may impose on Company a franchise fee by collecting the amounts indicated in a Fee Schedule set forth in a separate ordinance from each customer in the designated Company Customer Class. The parties have agreed that the franchise fee collected by the Company and paid to the City in accordance with this Section 9 shall not exceed the following amounts. Class Fee Per Premise Per Month Residential $ 4.00 Sm C & I – Non-Dem $ 8.50 Sm C & I – Demand $ 45.00 Large C & I $ 145.00 Public Street Ltg $ 0 Muni Pumping –N/D $ 8.50 Muni Pumping – Dem $ 45.00 9.2 Separate Ordinance. The franchise fee shall be imposed by a separate ordinance duly adopted by the City Council, which ordinance shall not be adopted until at least 90 days after written notice enclosing such proposed ordinance has been served upon Company by certified mail. The fee shall not become effective until the beginning of a Company billing month at least 90 days after written notice enclosing such adopted ordinance has been served upon Company by certified mail. Section 2.5 shall constitute the sole remedy for solving disputes between Company and the City in regard to the interpretation of, or enforcement of, the separate ordinance. No action by the City to implement a separate ordinance will commence until this Ordinance is effective. A separate ordinance which imposes a lesser franchise fee on the residential class of customers than the maximum amount set forth in Section 9.1 above shall not be effective against Company unless the fee imposed on each other customer classification is reduced proportionately in the same or greater amount per class as the reduction represented by the lesser fee on the residential class. 9.3 Terms Defined. For the purpose of this Section 9, the following definitions apply: 9.3.1 “Customer Class” shall refer to the classes listed on the Fee Schedule and as defined or determined in Company’s electric tariffs on file with the Commission. 9.3.2 “Fee Schedule” refers to the schedule in Section 9.1 setting forth the various customer classes from which a franchise fee would be collected if a separate ordinance were implemented immediately after the effective date of this franchise agreement. The Fee Schedule in the separate ordinance may include new Customer Class added by Company to its electric tariffs after the effective date of this franchise agreement. 9.4 Collection of the Fee. The franchise fee shall be payable quarterly and shall be based on the amount collected by Company during complete billing months during the period for which payment is to be made by imposing a surcharge equal to the designated franchise fee for the applicable customer classification in all customer billings for electric service in each class. The payment shall be due the last business day of the month following the period for which the payment is made. The franchise fee may be changed by ordinance from time to time; however, each change shall meet the same notice requirements and not occur more often than annually and no change shall require a collection from any customer for electric service in excess of the amounts specifically permitted by City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 6a) Page 11 Title: First Reading of Ordinance Imposing a Franchise Fee on Northern States Power Co. (dba Xcel Energy) this Section 9. The time and manner of collecting the franchise fee is subject to the approval of the Commission. No franchise fee shall be payable by Company if Company is legally unable to first collect an amount equal to the franchise fee from its customers in each applicable class of customers by imposing a surcharge in Company’s applicable rates for electric service. Company may pay the City the fee based upon the surcharge billed subject to subsequent reductions to account for uncollectibles, refunds and correction of erroneous billings. Company agrees to make its records available for inspection by the City at reasonable times provided that the City and its designated representative agree in writing not to disclose any information which would indicate the amount paid by any identifiable customer or customers or any other information regarding identified customers. 9.5 Equivalent Fee Requirement. The separate ordinance imposing the fee shall not be effective against Company unless it lawfully imposes and the City monthly or more often collects a fee or tax of the same or greater equivalent amount on the receipts from sales of energy within the City by any other energy supplier, provided that, as to such a supplier, the City has the authority to require a franchise fee or to impose a tax. The “same or greater equivalent amount” shall be measured, if practicable, by comparing amounts collected as a franchise fee from each similar customer, or by comparing, as to similar customers the percentage of the annual bill represented by the amount collected for franchise fee purposes. The franchise fee or tax shall be applicable to energy sales for any energy use related to heating, cooling or lighting, or to run machinery and appliances, but shall not apply to energy sales for the purpose of providing fuel for vehicles. If the Company specifically consents in writing to a franchise or separate ordinance collecting or failing to collect a fee from another energy supplier in contravention of this Section 9.5, the foregoing conditions will be waived to the extent of such written consent. 9.6 City Fees. Company shall be responsible for all permit or other fees imposed by the City for work conducted pursuant to this franchise. SECTION 10. SERVICE RELIABILITY, INFRASTRUCTURE REPORTING. The Company and the City shall meet annually at a mutually convenient time to discuss items of concern or interest relating to this Franchise, including not limited to, reliability, performance, infrastructure plans for the coming year and other matters raised by the City or the Company. Annually upon request by City, the Company shall provide to City reporting information on service reliability, including System Average Interruption Duration Index (SAIDI), Customers Experiencing Multiple Interruptions (CEMI) and municipal pumping station and general customer outage date for the previous year, the exact format and content of which shall be mutually agreed to by City and Company.” SECTION 11. PROVISIONS OF ORDINANCE. 11.1 Severability. Every section, provision, or part of this Ordinance is declared separate from every other section, provision, or part and if any section, provision, or part shall be held invalid, it shall not affect any other section, provision, or part. Where a provision of any other City ordinance conflicts with the provisions of this Ordinance, the provisions of this Ordinance shall prevail. 11.2 Limitation on Applicability. This Ordinance constitutes a franchise agreement between the City and Company as the only parties, and no provision of this franchise shall in any way inure to the benefit of any third person (including the public at large) so as to constitute any City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 6a) Page 12 Title: First Reading of Ordinance Imposing a Franchise Fee on Northern States Power Co. (dba Xcel Energy) such person as a third party beneficiary of the agreement or of any one or more of the terms hereof, or otherwise give rise to any cause of action in any person not a party hereto. SECTION 12. AMENDMENT PROCEDURE. Either party to this franchise agreement may at any time propose that the agreement be amended to address a subject of concern and the other party will consider whether it agrees that the amendment is mutually appropriate. If an amendment is agreed upon, this Ordinance may be amended at any time by the City passing a subsequent ordinance declaring the provisions of the amendment, which amendatory ordinance shall become effective upon the filing of Company’s written consent thereto with the City Clerk within 90 days after the date of final passage by the City of the amendatory ordinance. SECTION 13. PREVIOUS FRANCHISES SUPERSEDED. This franchise supersedes any previous electric franchise granted to Company or its predecessor. SECTION 14. EFFECTIVE DATE; WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE. This franchise shall be in force and effect from and after passage of this Ordinance, its acceptance by Company, and its publication as required by law. The City Council may revoke this franchise if Company does not file a written acceptance with the City within 90 days after publication. Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council September 19, 2016 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Approved as to Form and Execution: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Soren Mattick, City Attorney Northern States Power Company, A Minnesota Corporation, d/b/a Xcel Energy By: ____________________________________ Subscribed and sworn to before me this ____ day of __________, 20__. _______________________________ Notary Public City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 6a) Page 13 Title: First Reading of Ordinance Imposing a Franchise Fee on Northern States Power Co. (dba Xcel Energy) ORDINANCE NO. ____-16 AN ORDINANCE IMPLEMENTING AN ELECTRIC SERVICE FRANCHISE FEE ON NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY, A MINNESOTA CORPORATION, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, FOR PROVIDING ELECTRIC SERVICE WITHIN THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK DOES ORDAIN: SECTION 1. The City of St. Louis Park Municipal Code is hereby amended to include reference to the following Special Ordinance. Subd. 1. Purpose. The St. Louis Park City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to impose a franchise fee on those public utility companies that provide electric services within the City of St. Louis Park. (a) Pursuant to City Ordinance ______, a Franchise Agreement between the City of St Louis Park and Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation, its successors and assigns, the City has the right to impose a franchise fee on Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation, its successors and assigns, in an amount and fee design as set forth in Section 9 of the Northern States Power Company Franchise and in the fee schedule attached hereto as Schedule A. Subd. 2. Franchise Fee Statement. A franchise fee is hereby imposed on Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota Corporation, its successors and assigns, under its electric franchise in accordance with the schedule attached here to and made a part of this Ordinance, commencing with the NSPM February, 2017 billing month. This fee is an account-based fee on each premise and not a meter-based fee. In the event that an entity covered by this ordinance has more than one meter at a single premise, but only one account, only one fee shall be assessed to that account. If a premise has two or more meters being billed at different rates, the Company may have an account for each rate classification, which will result in more than one franchise fee assessment for electric service to that premise. If the Company combines the rate classifications into a single account, the franchise fee assessed to the account will be the largest franchise fee applicable to a single rate classification for energy delivered to that premise. In the event any entities covered by this ordinance have more than one premise, each premise (address) shall be subject to the appropriate fee. In the event a question arises as to the proper fee amount for any premise, the Company’s manner of billing for energy used at all similar premises in the city will control. Subd. 3. Payment. The said franchise fee shall be payable to the City in accordance with the terms set forth in Section 9 of the Franchise. Subd. 4. Surcharge. The City recognizes that the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission may allow Company to add a surcharge to customer rates of city residents to reimburse Company for the cost of the fee. Subd. 5. Enforcement. Any dispute, including enforcement of a default regarding this ordinance will be resolved in accordance with Section 2.5 of the Franchise Agreement. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 6a) Page 14 Title: First Reading of Ordinance Imposing a Franchise Fee on Northern States Power Co. (dba Xcel Energy) Subd. 6. Effective Date of Franchise Fee. The effective date of this Ordinance shall be after its publication and ninety (90) days after the sending of written notice enclosing a copy of this adopted Ordinance to NSPM by certified mail. Collection of the fee shall commence as provided above. First Reading of Ordinance 09/06/2016 Second Reading of Ordinance 09/19/2016 Date of Publication 09/29/2016 Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council September 19, 2016 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Approved as to Form and Execution: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Soren Mattick, City Attorney City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 6a) Page 15 Title: First Reading of Ordinance Imposing a Franchise Fee on Northern States Power Co. (dba Xcel Energy) SCHEDULE A Franchise Fee Rates: Electric Utility The franchise fee shall be in an amount determined by applying the following schedule per customer premise/per month based on metered service to retail customers within the City: Class Amount per month Residential $ 4.00 Sm C & I – Non-Dem $ 8.50 Sm C & I – Demand $ 45.00 Large C & I $ 145.00 Public Street Ltg $ 0 Muni Pumping –N/D $ 8.50 Muni Pumping – Dem $ 45.00 Franchise fees are submitted to the City on a quarterly basis as follows: January – March collections due by April 30. April – June collections due by July 31. July – September collections due by October 31. October – December collections due by January 31. Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: September 6, 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: First Reading of Ordinance Imposing a Franchise Fee on CenterPoint Energy Resources Corporation RECOMMENDED ACTION: Mayor to open the public hearing, solicit comments, and to close the public hearing. Motion to approve first reading of an ordinance imposing a franchise fee on CenterPoint Energy Resources Corporation and set second reading for September 19, 2016. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish to increase the franchise fees for CenterPoint Energy to assist in funding the City’s Pavement Management Program? SUMMARY: The City has imposed franchise fees on CenterPoint Energy (CPE) since 2004. Keeping with Council direction of reviewing the fees every other year, the fees were increased to $3.25/month for a residential customer in 2015. Staff recommends the fees are increased to $4.00/ month for a residential customer in 2017. Staff is proposing, and CPE supports, that their franchise fee is consistent with the franchise fee imposed on Xcel Energy. Staff recommends Council approve the 1st Reading this evening and set the 2nd reading for September 19, 2016. Based on this schedule, the franchise fee increase would be effective February 1, 2017. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The City’s Pavement Management Program is currently funded by franchise fee revenues, collected by both Xcel and CPE. Based on the current fees, total franchise fees generate approximately $2.3 million annually (CenterPoint - $889,524; Xcel - $1,420,116). The proposed increase in the CPE franchise fee would add approximately $266,046 in additional annual revenue to the Pavement Management Program, and provide greater sustainability into the future. By implementing this proposed franchise fee increase for 2017, St. Louis Park would still be competitive with other cities in the area. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion Franchise Ordinance Franchise Fee Ordinance Prepared by: Debra Heiser, Engineering Director Reviewed by: Tim Simon, Chief Financial Officer Approved by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director Public Hearing Agenda Item: 6b City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 6b) Page 2 Title: First Reading of Ordinance Imposing a Franchise Fee on CenterPoint Energy Resources Corporation DISCUSSION BACKGROUND: In early 2003 the City adopted an ordinance granting CenterPoint Energy (CPE) a natural gas utility franchise in the city. That ordinance allowed the City to impose a franchise fee on CPE. That ordinance allowed the City to impose a franchise fee on CPE. The Franchise ordinance expires at the end of this year. The City has been working with CPE on a new ordinance since 2013. The new ordinance has been reviewed by the City and CPE and is attached. The franchise ordinance has a 20 year term. Franchise fees in St. Louis Park are used in their entirety to assist in funding the cost the City experiences to maintain, reconstruct and repair the street system via the City’s Pavement Management Program. On July 18, 2016, the City Council approved an updated assessment policy that shifted funding of the majority of public improvement to franchise fees. In general, the City Council’s direction for the public improvements discussed as a part of this policy was “If there is a public purpose for the infrastructure, the City should fund construction.” The proposed fee increase will fund all local street and alley construction projects. The Council has historically considered franchise fee adjustments every other year and based on that schedule 2017 and 2019 would be the years to consider adjusting the fees. In the long range financial plan the current estimates reflect a $0.75 increase per utility/per month for single family home in 2017 and $0.75 again in 2019 to fully fund the pavement management program. Beyond 2019, we have not programmed any changes but will review annually as part of the CIP process. This plan reflects the 10 year CIP assuming no assessments for all local street and alley construction projects. The franchise fee is essentially a user fee collected from customers on their utility bill and paid to Xcel. The utility then functions essentially as a pass through entity with the franchise fee revenue being remitted to the City of St. Louis Park. PRESENT CONSIDERATIONS: As discussed with the Council most recently on July 18, 2016, staff is proposing a $0.75/month fee increase to residential customers for 2017 to continue funding the Pavement Management Program. Based on customer class, customers would see increases ranging from $0.75/month per utility for residential customers to $45.00/month per utility for large commercial/industrial customers (please see attachment - Franchise Fee Estimate). Residential customers make up approximately 90% of the total customers. It was desired by the City to adopt an ordinance that would allow for automatic annual or alternating year fee increases, but that is not allowed by the Public Utilities Commission. The City also imposes an equivalent franchise fee on Xcel Energy. Staff is also proposing (under separate action) to increase Xcel’s current basic Franchise Fee by $0.75/month per utility for residential customers. Per the City’s Long Range Financial Management Plan, by increasing franchise fees in 2017, it is projected that the Pavement Management Program could be funded entirely by franchise fees making the fund sustainable in the long-term based on projected expenditures and no significant changes to the program. Based on recent discussions with CPE staff, they do not oppose this proposed increase in the franchise fee. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 6b) Page 3 Title: First Reading of Ordinance Imposing a Franchise Fee on CenterPoint Energy Resources Corporation NEXT STEPS: The following steps outline the adoption process to be followed: 1. Ordinances must contain all the terms and conditions of the franchise 2. Franchise ordinances require a public hearing 3. At least seven days must pass between first reading (public hearing) and 2nd reading 4. At second reading motion will be “Motion to adopt the ordinance, approve the summary and authorize summary publication” 5. Ordinance becomes effective 90 days following adoption Based on the above process, staff has developed the following steps and schedule for adopting the franchise ordinance and franchise fee ordinance: First Reading of Ordinances 09/06/2016 Second Reading of Ordinance 09/19/2016 60 days after notifying utilities Ordinance takes effect 02/01/2017 90 days after 2nd reading Utilities begin collection 02/01/2017 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 6b) Page 4 Title: First Reading of Ordinance Imposing a Franchise Fee on CenterPoint Energy Resources Corporation City of St Louis Park, Minnesota Franchise Fee Estimate Variable Increases Proposed for 2017 Xcel - Electric CUSTOMER CLASS AVERAGE MONTHLY CUSTOMER COUNT ESTIMATED ANNUAL FRANCHISE FEE REVENUES 2017 New Revenue Estimate Current MONTHLY FLAT FEE 2017 New Fee Proposal Residential 22,242 $867,438 $1,067,616 $3.25 $4.00 Small C&I – Non-Demand 1,350 $105,300 $137,700 $6.50 $8.50 Small C&I – Demand 699 $251,640 $377,460 $30.00 $45.00 Large C&I 149 $187,740 $259,260 $105.00 $145.00 Public Street Lighting 75 $0 $0 Municipal Pumping – Non-Demand 21 $1,518 $2,151 $6.00 $8.50 Municipal Pumping – Demand 18 $6,480 $9,720 $30.00 $45.00 Total 24,554 $1,420,116 $1,853,907 Net Increase $433,791 CenterPoint - Heating Gas CUSTOMER CLASS AVERAGE MONTHLY CUSTOMER COUNT ESTIMATED ANNUAL FRANCHISE FEE REVENUES 2017 New Revenue Estimate Current MONTHLY FLAT FEE 2017 New Fee Proposal Residential 16,382 $638,898 $786,336 $3.25 $4.00 Commercial B 407 $31,746 $41,514 $6.50 $8.50 Commercial C 519 $186,840 $280,260 $30.00 $45.00 SVDF A & B 75 $27,000 $40,500 $30.00 $45.00 LVDF 4 $5,040 $6,960 $105.00 $145.00 Total 17,387 $889,524 $1,155,570 Net Increase $266,046 Total $699,837 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 6b) Page 5 Title: First Reading of Ordinance Imposing a Franchise Fee on CenterPoint Energy Resources Corporation ORDINANCE NO. ____-16 CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE GRANTING CENTERPOINT ENERGY RESOURCES CORP., D/B/A CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNESOTA GAS (“CENTERPOINT ENERGY”),, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, A NONEXCLUSIVE FRANCHISE TO CONSTRUCT, OPERATE, REPAIR AND MAINTAIN FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FOR THE TRANSPORTATION, DISTRIBUTION, MANUFACTURE AND SALE OF GAS ENERGY FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE USE AND TO USE PUBLIC WAYS AND PUBLIC GROUNDS OF THE CITY FOR SUCH PURPOSES; AND PRESCRIBING CERTAIN TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK DOES ORDAIN: SECTION 1. DEFINITIONS. For purposes of this Ordinance, the following capitalized terms listed in alphabetical order shall have the following meanings: 1.1 City. The City of St. Louis Park, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota. 1.2 City Utility System. Facilities used for providing public utility service owned or operated by City or agency thereof, including sanitary sewer, storm sewer, street lighting, traffic signals, and water service, but excluding facilities for providing heating, lighting or other forms of energy. 1.3 Commission. The Minnesota Public Utilities Commission, or any successor agency or agencies, including an agency of the federal government, which preempts all, or part of the authority to regulate gas retail rates now vested in the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission. 1.4 Company. CenterPoint Energy Resources Corp., d/b/a CenterPoint Energy Minnesota Gas (“CenterPoint Energy”), its successors and assigns, including all successors or assigns that own or operate any part or parts of the Gas Facilities subject to this Franchise. 1.5 Gas. Natural gas, manufactured gas, mixture of natural gas and manufactured gas or other forms of gas energy. 1.6 Gas Facilities. Gas transmission and distribution pipes, mains, lines, ducts, fixtures, and all necessary facilities, equipment and appurtenances owned, operated or otherwise used by the Company for the purpose of providing gas energy for public use. 1.7 Notice. A written notice served by one party on the other party referencing one or more provisions of this Ordinance. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 6b) Page 6 Title: First Reading of Ordinance Imposing a Franchise Fee on CenterPoint Energy Resources Corporation Notice to Company shall be mailed to: CenterPoint Energy, Minnesota Division Vice President, 505 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402. Notice to the City shall be mailed to: City Manager, City Hall, 5005 Minnetonka Boulevard, St. Louis Park, MN 55416. Either party may change its respective address for the purpose of this Ordinance by written notice to the other party. 1.7 Ordinance. This gas franchise ordinance, also referred to as the Franchise. 1.8 Public Ground. Land owned or otherwise controlled by the City for park, open space or similar purpose, which is held for use in common by the public. 1.8 Public Way. Any street, alley, walkway or other public right-of-way located within the City. SECTION 2. ADOPTION OF FRANCHISE. 2.1 Grant of Franchise. City hereby grants Company, for a period of 20 years from the date passed and approved by the City, the right to transmit and furnish gas energy for light, heat, power and other purposes for public and private use within and through the limits of the City as its boundaries now exist or as they may be extended in the future. For these purposes, Company may construct, operate, repair and maintain Gas Facilities in, on, over, under and across the Public Grounds and Public Ways of City, subject to the provisions of this franchise. Company may do all reasonable things necessary or customary to accomplish these purposes, subject, however, to such reasonable regulations as may be imposed by the City pursuant to a public right-of-way ordinance or permit requirements adopted consistent with state law. 2.2 Effective Date; Written Acceptance. This franchise agreement shall be in force and effect from and after passage of this Ordinance, its acceptance by Company, and its publication as required by law. The City, by Council resolution, may revoke this franchise agreement if Company does not file a written acceptance with the City within 90 days after publication. 2.3 Service and Rates. The service to be provided and the rates to be charged by Company for gas service in City are subject to the jurisdiction of the Commission. 2.4 Publication Expense. The expense of publication of this Ordinance will be paid by City and reimbursed to City by Company. 2.5 Dispute Resolution. If either party asserts that the other party is in default in the performance of any obligation hereunder, the complaining party shall notify the other party of the City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 6b) Page 7 Title: First Reading of Ordinance Imposing a Franchise Fee on CenterPoint Energy Resources Corporation default and the desired remedy. The notification shall be written. Representatives of the parties must promptly meet and attempt in good faith to negotiate a resolution of the dispute. If the dispute is not resolved within 30 days of the written notice, the parties may jointly select a mediator to facilitate further discussion. The parties will equally share the fees and expenses of this mediator. If a mediator is not used, or if the parties are unable to resolve the dispute within 30 days after first meeting with the selected mediator, either party may commence an action in District Court to interpret and enforce this franchise or for such other relief as may be permitted by law or equity for breach of contract, or either party may take any other action permitted by law. 2.6. Continuation of Franchise. If the City and the Company are unable to agree on the terms of a new franchise by the time this Franchise expires, this Franchise will remain in effect until a new franchise is agreed upon, or until 90 days after the City or the Company serves written Notice to the other party of its intention to allow Franchise to expire. However, in no event shall this Franchise continue for more than one year after expiration of the 20-year term set forth in Section 2.1. SECTION 3. LOCATION, OTHER REGULATIONS. 3.1 Location of Facilities. Gas Facilities shall be located, constructed and maintained so as not to interfere with the safety and convenience of ordinary travel along and over Public Ways and so as not to disrupt normal operation of any City Utility System previously installed therein. Gas Facilities shall be located on Public Grounds as determined by the City. Company's construction, reconstruction, operation, repair, maintenance and location of Gas Facilities shall be subject to permits if required by separate ordinance and to other reasonable regulations of the City to the extent not inconsistent with the terms of this franchise agreement. Company may abandon underground Gas Facilities in place, provided at the City’s request, Company will remove abandoned metal or concrete encased conduit interfering with a City improvement project, but only to the extent such conduit is uncovered by excavation as part of the City improvement project. The Company shall maintain records describing the exact location of all abandoned and retired Gas Facilities within the Public Ways and Public Grounds, produce such records at the City’s request and comply with the location requirements of Section 216D.04 with respect to all Gas Facilities, including abandoned and retired Gas Facilities not located in Public Ways and Public Grounds. 3.2 Field Locations and Mapping Information. Company shall provide field locations for its underground Gas Facilities within the City consistent with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 216D. Company shall provide current mapping information for any of its Gas Facilities in accordance with Minnesota Rules Parts 7819.4000 and 7819.4100 and other applicable state and federal laws. 3.3 Street Openings. Company shall not open or disturb any Public Ground or Public Way for any purpose without first having obtained a permit from the City, if required by a separate ordinance, for which the City may impose a reasonable fee. Permit conditions imposed on Company shall not be more burdensome than those imposed on other utilities for similar facilities or work. Company may, however, open and disturb any Public Ground or Public Way without permission from the City where an emergency exists requiring the immediate repair of Gas Facilities. In such event Company shall notify the City by telephone to the office designated by the City as soon as practicable. Not later than the second working day thereafter, Company shall obtain any required permits and pay any required fees. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 6b) Page 8 Title: First Reading of Ordinance Imposing a Franchise Fee on CenterPoint Energy Resources Corporation 3.4 Restoration. After undertaking any work requiring the opening of any Public Ground or Public Way, Company shall restore the same, including paving and its foundation, in accordance with Minnesota Rules Part 7819.1100, to as good a condition as formerly existed, and shall maintain any paved surface in good condition for two years thereafter. The work shall be completed as promptly as weather permits, and if Company shall not promptly perform and complete the work, remove all dirt, rubbish, equipment and material, and put the Public Ground or Public Way in the said condition, the City shall have, after demand to Company to cure and the passage of a reasonable period of time following the demand, but not to exceed five days, the right to make the restoration at the expense of Company. Company shall pay to the City the cost of such work done for or performed by the City. This remedy shall be in addition to any other remedy available to the City for noncompliance with this Section 3.4, but the City hereby waives any requirement for Company to post a construction performance bond, certificate of insurance, letter of credit or any other form of security or assurance that may be required, under a separate existing or future ordinance of the City, of a person or entity obtaining the City’s permission to install, replace or maintain facilities in a Public Way. 3.5 Avoid Damage to Gas Facilities. Nothing in this Ordinance relieves any person from liability arising out of the failure to exercise reasonable care to avoid damaging Gas Facilities while performing any activity. 3.6 Notice of Improvements. The City must give Company reasonable notice of plans for improvements to Public Grounds or Public Ways where the City has reason to believe that Gas Facilities may affect or be affected by the improvement. The notice must contain: (i) the nature and character of the improvements, (ii) the Public Grounds and Public Ways upon which the improvements are to be made, (iii) the extent of the improvements, (iv) the time when the City will start the work, and (v) if more than one Public Ground or Public Way is involved, the order in which the work is to proceed. The notice must be given to Company a sufficient length of time in advance of the actual commencement of the work to permit Company to make any necessary additions, alterations or repairs to its Gas Facilities. SECTION 4. RELOCATIONS. 4.1 Relocation of Gas Facilities in Public Ways. Company shall comply with the requirements of Minnesota Rules, Part 7819.3100 and applicable law relating to relocation of Gas Facilities in Public Ways. If a relocation is ordered within five (5) years of a prior relocation of the same Gas Facilities, which was made at Company expense, the City shall reimburse Company for non-betterment expenses on a time and material basis, provided that if a subsequent relocation is required because of the extension of a City Utility System to a previously unserved area, Company may be required to make the subsequent relocation at its expense. Nothing in this Ordinance requires Company to relocate, remove, replace or reconstruct at its own expense its Gas Facilities where such relocation, removal, replacement or reconstruction is solely for the convenience of the City and is not reasonably necessary for the construction or reconstruction of a Public Way or City Utility System or other City improvement. 4.2 Relocation of Gas Facilities in Public Ground. City may require Company, at Company’s expense, to relocate or remove its Gas Facilities from Public Ground upon a finding by City that the Gas Facilities have become or will become a substantial impairment to the existing or proposed public use of the Public Ground. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 6b) Page 9 Title: First Reading of Ordinance Imposing a Franchise Fee on CenterPoint Energy Resources Corporation 4.3 Projects with Federal Funding. Relocation, removal or rearrangement of any Company Gas Facilities made necessary because of the extension into or through City of a federally-aided highway project shall be governed by the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 161.46, as supplemented or amended. 4.4 No Waiver. The provisions of this franchise apply only to facilities constructed in reliance on a franchise from the City and shall not be construed to waive or modify any rights obtained by Company for installations within a Company right-of-way acquired by easement or prescriptive right before the applicable Public Ground or Public Way was established, or Company's rights under state or county permit. SECTION 5. INDEMNIFICATION. 5.1 Indemnity of City. Company shall indemnify, keep and hold the City free and harmless from any and all liability on account of injury to persons or damage to property occasioned by the construction, maintenance, repair, inspection, the issuance of permits, or the operation of the Gas Facilities located in the Public Grounds and Public Ways. The City shall not be indemnified for losses or claims occasioned through its own negligence except for losses or claims arising out of or alleging the City's negligence as to the issuance of permits for, or inspection of, Company's plans or work. The City shall not be indemnified if the injury or damage results from the performance in a proper manner, of acts reasonably deemed hazardous by Company, and such performance is nevertheless ordered or directed by City after notice of Company's determination. 5.2 Defense of City. In the event a suit is brought against the City under circumstances where this franchise agreement to indemnify applies, Company at its sole cost and expense shall defend the City in such suit if written notice thereof is promptly given to Company within a period wherein Company is not prejudiced by lack of such notice. If Company is required to indemnify and defend, it will thereafter have control of such litigation, but Company may not settle such litigation without the consent of the City, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. This section is not, as to third parties, a waiver of any defense or immunity otherwise available to the City and Company, in defending any action on behalf of the City, shall be entitled to assert in any action every defense or immunity that the City could assert in its own behalf. This franchise shall not be interpreted to constitute a waiver by the City of any of its defenses of immunity or limitations under Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466. SECTION 6. VACATION OF PUBLIC WAYS. The City shall give Company at least two weeks prior written notice of a proposed vacation of a Public Way. Except where required for a City improvement project, the vacation of any Public Way, after the installation of Gas Facilities, shall not operate to deprive Company of its rights to operate and maintain such Gas Facilities, until the reasonable cost of relocating the same and the loss and expense resulting from such relocation is first paid to Company. In no case, however, shall City be liable to Company for failure to specifically preserve a right-of-way under Minnesota Statutes, Section 160.29. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 6b) Page 10 Title: First Reading of Ordinance Imposing a Franchise Fee on CenterPoint Energy Resources Corporation SECTION 7. CHANGE IN FORM OF GOVERNMENT. Any change in the form of government of the City shall not affect the validity of this Ordinance. Any governmental unit succeeding the City shall, without the consent of Company, succeed to all of the rights and obligations of the City provided in this Ordinance. SECTION 8. FRANCHISE FEE. 8.1 Fee Schedule. During the term of the franchise hereby granted, the City may impose on Company a franchise fee by collecting the amounts indicated in a Fee Schedule set forth in a separate ordinance from each customer in the designated Company Customer Class. Such fee shall not exceed any amount that the Company may legally charge to its customers. 8.2 Separate Ordinance. The franchise fee shall be imposed by a separate ordinance duly adopted by the City Council, which ordinance shall not be adopted until at least 90 days after written notice enclosing such proposed ordinance has been served upon Company by certified mail. The fee shall not become effective until the beginning of a Company billing month at least 90 days after written notice enclosing such adopted ordinance has been served upon Company by certified mail. Section 2.5 shall constitute the sole remedy for solving disputes between Company and the City in regard to the interpretation of, or enforcement of, the separate ordinance. No action by the City to implement a separate ordinance will commence until this Ordinance is effective. 8.3 Terms Defined. For the purpose of this Section 8, the following definitions apply: 8.3.1 “Customer Class” shall refer to the classes listed on the Fee Schedule and as defined or determined in Company’s gas tariffs on file with the Commission. 8.3.2 “Fee Schedule” refers to the schedule in the fee ordinance setting forth the various customer classes from which a franchise fee would be collected if a separate ordinance were implemented immediately after the effective date of this franchise agreement. The Fee Schedule in the separate ordinance may include new Customer Class added by Company to its gas tariffs after the effective date of this franchise agreement. 8.4 Collection of the Fee. The franchise fee shall be payable quarterly and shall be based on the amount collected by Company during complete billing months during the period for which payment is to be made by imposing a surcharge equal to the designated franchise fee for the applicable customer classification in all customer billings for gas service in each class. The payment shall be due the last business day of the month following the period for which the payment is made. The franchise fee may be changed by ordinance from time to time; however, each change shall meet the same notice requirements and not occur more often than annually and no change shall require a collection from any customer for gas service in excess of the amounts specifically permitted by this Section 8. No franchise fee shall be payable by Company if Company is legally unable to first collect an amount equal to the franchise fee from its customers in each applicable class of customers by imposing a surcharge in Company’s applicable rates for service. Company may pay the City the fee based upon the surcharge billed subject to subsequent reductions to account for uncollectibles, refunds and correction of erroneous billings. Company agrees to make its records available for inspection by the City at reasonable times provided that the City and its designated representative agree in writing not to disclose any information which would indicate the amount paid by any identifiable customer or customers or any other information regarding identified customers. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 6b) Page 11 Title: First Reading of Ordinance Imposing a Franchise Fee on CenterPoint Energy Resources Corporation 8.5 Equivalent Fee Requirement. The separate ordinance imposing the fee shall not be effective against Company unless it lawfully imposes and the City monthly or more often collects a fee or tax of the same or greater equivalent amount on the receipts from sales of energy within the City by any other energy supplier, provided that, as to such a supplier, the City has the authority to require a franchise fee or to impose a tax. The “same or greater equivalent amount” shall be measured, if practicable, by comparing amounts collected as a franchise fee from each similar customer, or by comparing, as to similar customers the percentage of the annual bill represented by the amount collected for franchise fee purposes. The franchise fee or tax shall be applicable to energy sales for any energy use related to heating, cooling or lighting, or to run machinery and appliances, but shall not apply to energy sales for the purpose of providing fuel for vehicles. If the Company specifically consents in writing to a franchise or separate ordinance collecting or failing to collect a fee from another energy supplier in contravention of this Section 8.5, the foregoing conditions will be waived to the extent of such written consent. 8.6 City Fees. Company shall be responsible for all permit or other fees imposed by the City for work conducted pursuant to this franchise. SECTION 9. PROVISIONS OF ORDINANCE. 9.1 Severability. Every section, provision, or part of this Ordinance is declared separate from every other section, provision, or part and if any section, provision, or part shall be held invalid, it shall not affect any other section, provision, or part. Where a provision of any other City ordinance conflicts with the provisions of this Ordinance, the provisions of this Ordinance shall prevail. 9.2 Limitation on Applicability. This Ordinance constitutes a franchise agreement between the City and Company as the only parties, and no provision of this franchise shall in any way inure to the benefit of any third person (including the public at large) so as to constitute any such person as a third party beneficiary of the agreement or of any one or more of the terms hereof, or otherwise give rise to any cause of action in any person not a party hereto. SECTION 10. AMENDMENT PROCEDURE. Either party to this franchise agreement may at any time propose that the agreement be amended to address a subject of concern and the other party will consider whether it agrees that the amendment is mutually appropriate. If an amendment is agreed upon, this Ordinance may be amended at any time by the City passing a subsequent ordinance declaring the provisions of the amendment, which amendatory ordinance shall become effective upon the filing of Company’s written consent thereto with the City Clerk within 90 days after the date of final passage by the City of the amendatory ordinance. SECTION 11. PREVIOUS FRANCHISES SUPERSEDED. This franchise supersedes any previous gas franchise granted to Company or its predecessor. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 6b) Page 12 Title: First Reading of Ordinance Imposing a Franchise Fee on CenterPoint Energy Resources Corporation SECTION 12. EFFECTIVE DATE; WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE. This franchise shall be in force and effect from and after passage of this Ordinance, its acceptance by Company, and its publication as required by law. The City Council may revoke this franchise if Company does not file a written acceptance with the City within 90 days after publication. Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council September 19, 2016 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Approved as to Form and Execution: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Soren Mattick, City Attorney CenterPoint Energy Resources Corp., d/b/a CenterPoint Energy Minnesota Gas By: ____________________________________ Subscribed and sworn to before me this ____ day of __________, 20__. _______________________________ Notary Public City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 6b) Page 13 Title: First Reading of Ordinance Imposing a Franchise Fee on CenterPoint Energy Resources Corporation ORDINANCE NO. ____-16 AN ORDINANCE IMPLEMENTING A NATURAL GAS FRANCHISE FEE ON CENTERPOINT ENERGY RESOURCES CORPORATION d/b/a CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNESOTA GAS (“CENTERPOINT ENERGY”), ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, FOR PROVIDING GAS SERVICE WITHIN THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK DOES ORDAIN: SECTION 1. The City of St. Louis Park Municipal Code is hereby amended to include reference to the following Special Ordinance. Subd. 1. Purpose. The St. Louis Park City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to impose a franchise fee on those public utility companies that provide gas services within the City of St. Louis Park. (a) Pursuant to City Ordinance ______, a Franchise Agreement between the City of St. Louis Park and CenterPoint Energy Resources Corporation d/b/a CenterPoint Energy Minnesota Gas, its successors and assigns, the City has the right to impose a franchise fee on CenterPoint Energy in an amount and fee design as set forth in Section 8 of the CenterPoint Energy Resources Franchise and in the fee schedule attached hereto as Schedule A. Subd. 2. Franchise Fee Statement. A franchise fee is hereby imposed on CenterPoint Energy, its successors and assigns, under its natural gas franchise in accordance with the schedule attached here to and made a part of this Ordinance, commencing with the CenterPoint Energy February, 2017 billing month. This fee is an account-based fee on each premise and not a meter-based fee. In the event that an entity covered by this ordinance has more than one meter at a single premise, but only one account, only one fee shall be assessed to that account. If a premise has two or more meters being billed at different rates, the Company may have an account for each rate classification, which will result in more than one franchise fee assessment for natural gas service to that premise. If the Company combines the rate classifications into a single account, the franchise fee assessed to the account will be the largest franchise fee applicable to a single rate classification for energy delivered to that premise. In the event any entities covered by this ordinance have more than one premise, each premise (address) shall be subject to the appropriate fee. In the event a question arises as to the proper fee amount for any premise, the Company’s manner of billing for energy used at all similar premises in the city will control. Subd. 3. Payment. The said franchise fee shall be payable to the City in accordance with the terms set forth in Section 9 of the Franchise. Subd. 4. Surcharge. The City recognizes that the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission may allow Company to add a surcharge to customer rates of city residents to reimburse Company for the cost of the fee, consistent with the Minnesota Public Utility Commission’s March 23, 2011 Order establishing franchise fee filing requirements in Docket No. E,G999/CI-09-970. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 6b) Page 14 Title: First Reading of Ordinance Imposing a Franchise Fee on CenterPoint Energy Resources Corporation Subd. 5. Enforcement. Any dispute, including enforcement of a default regarding this ordinance will be resolved in accordance with Section 2.5 of the Franchise Agreement. Subd. 6. Effective Date of Franchise Fee. The effective date of this Ordinance shall be after its publication and ninety (90) days after the sending of written notice enclosing a copy of this adopted Ordinance to CenterPoint Energy by certified mail. Collection of the fee shall commence as provided above. First Reading of Ordinance 09/06/2016 Second Reading of Ordinance 09/19/2016 Date of Publication 09/29/2016 Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council September 19, 2016 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Approved as to Form and Execution: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Soren Mattick, City Attorney City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 6b) Page 15 Title: First Reading of Ordinance Imposing a Franchise Fee on CenterPoint Energy Resources Corporation SCHEDULE A Franchise Fee Rates: Gas Utility The franchise fee shall be in an amount determined by applying the following schedule per customer premise/per month based on metered service to retail customers within the City: Class Amount per month Residential $ 4.00 Commercial B $ 8.50 Commercial C $ 45.00 SVDF A& B $ 45.00 LVDF $ 145.00 Franchise fees are submitted to the City on a quarterly basis as follows: January – March collections due by April 30. April – June collections due by July 31. July – September collections due by October 31. October – December collections due by January 31. Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: September 6, 2016 Action Agenda Item: 8a EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Floodplain District Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to approve First Reading of Ordinance amending Chapter 36, Article IV, Division 10 of the St. Louis Park Code of Ordinances relating to Floodplain Districts and amending the Official Zoning Map. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does City Council support the proposed amendments to the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map pertaining to Floodplain Districts in order to remain in compliance with the Federal and State regulations and to maintain the City’s eligibility to participate in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)? SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) on May 4, 2016 issued a Letter of Final Determination notifying the City that revised FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) would become effective on November 4, 2016. Due to these changes, the city’s Floodplain Ordinance must be amended to comply with new and updated Federal regulations by no later than November 4, 2016 to order for the community to remain eligible for the NFIP. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) NFIP Coordinator informed the city on May 12, 2016 that St. Louis Park’s current floodplain ordinance will not comply with the new Federal regulations and provided an updated model floodplain ordinance. Staff prepared the attached Floodplain Ordinance which modifies the DNR model ordinance to reflect the floodplain regulations St. Louis Park has historically enforced, while at the same time incorporating the language required by FEMA and DNR. No floodplain district policy changes are suggested at this time. The Official Zoning Map will also be amended to reflect the new FIRM. The Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended approval of the amendments on August 17, 2016. Approximately 12 people attended the meeting. Those that spoke at the hearing asked questions about how the changes impacted their properties and about the process to obtain flood insurance or to document that they are not required to have flood insurance. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a leader in environmental stewardship. We will increase environmental consciousness and responsibility in all areas of city business. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion Proposed Floodplain Ordinance Proposed Official Zoning Map Floodplain District Boundary Changes Exhibit Planning Commission Meeting Minutes FEMA Letter of Final Determination dated May 4, 2016 DNR Letter dated May 12, 2016 DNR Letter of Conditional State Approval Prepared by: Sean Walther, Planning and Zoning Supervisor Reviewed by: Michele Schnitker, Deputy Community Development Director Approved by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Page 2 Title: Floodplain District Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments DISCUSSION BACKGROUND: The City of St. Louis Park has had a Floodplain District Ordinance in effect since 1976 to enforce strict standards for construction and uses within city floodplains. Historically, the City of St. Louis Park floodplain district ordinance has gone above and beyond what is required by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR), and the watershed districts. As per FEMA and MNDNR, the City of St. Louis Park needs to update the city’s floodplain ordinance and floodplain district boundaries to adhere to new federal and state requirements no later than November 4, 2016. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) contacted the City of St. Louis Park on May 4, 2016 with a Letter of Final Determination to inform the Mayor and City Council that revised FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) would become effective on November 4, 2016. The notice states that the city’s Floodplain Ordinance must be amended to comply with new and updated Federal regulations with regards to the NFIP no later than November 4, 2016. The regulations also require the city’s Floodplain District boundaries on the Zoning Map to match the boundaries shown on the new FIRM. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) NFIP Coordinator contacted the city on May 12, 2016 and informed the city that its current floodplain ordinance will not comply with the new Federal regulations. PRESENT CONSIDERATIONS: The DNR prepared a model ordinance for cities across Minnesota to use as a guide to rewrite local floodplain ordinances. City staff adapted the DNR model ordinance to retain the high standards for land use activities occurring in floodplains that St. Louis Park has historically required and to comply with the underlying zoning land use districts, while also including the new FEMA and DNR requirements. No floodplain district policy changes are suggested at this time. The current Floodplain District code will be replaced in its entirety. The Floodplain District Ordinance draft was submitted to the DNR on July 19, 2016 for review. The DNR contacted Mayor Spano and city staff on July 25, 2016 stating that the ordinance was conditionally approved with two minor additions including a definition and standards for recreational vehicles. Staff amended the ordinance to incorporate these two items. In addition to the DNR model ordinance update, there is an update to the FEMA FIRM. In general, the changes to the floodplain boundaries occur along Minnehaha Creek. As part of the process of updating the zoning map, a public hearing notice was published in the Sun Sailor and city staff mailed public hearing notices on August 3, 2016 to the 215 property owners whose land intersects changes to the boundary. Where there was no change to the boundary, city staff did not mail notices to those property owners. Although not required by FEMA or DNR, city staff is developing a webpage to provide St. Louis Park property owners with helpful links to FEMA and DNR resources. City staff is also preparing an online mapping tool to assist property owners in generating some of the information they may need to provide to FEMA and their mortgage companies. This information will be available before the new FIRM maps are effective. NEXT STEPS: September 19, 2016 – City Council will hold a 2nd reading of the ordinance. September 29, 2016 – The ordinance summary will be published in the Sun Sailor. November 4, 2016 – The ordinance will become effective. ORDINANCE NO. 16-_____ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ST. LOUIS PARK CODE OF ORDINANCES CHAPTER 36, ARTICLE IV, DIVISION 10 RELATING TO FLOODPLAIN DISTRICTS THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK DOES ORDAIN: SECTION 1. The City Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission (Case No. 16-34-ZA). SECTION 2. Division 10 of the St. Louis Park Code of Ordinances is hereby repealed and replaced in its entirety to read as follows: DIVISION 10. FLOODPLAIN DISTRICTS Sec. 36-291. Statutory Authorization. The legislature of the State of Minnesota has, in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 103F and Chapter 462 delegated the responsibility to local government units to adopt regulations designed to minimize flood losses. Therefore, the City Council of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, does ordain as follows. Sec. 36-292. Purpose. (a) This ordinance regulates development in the flood hazard areas of St. Louis Park. These flood hazard areas are subject to periodic inundation, which may result in loss of life and property, health and safety hazards, disruption of commerce and governmental services, extraordinary public expenditures for flood protection and relief, and impairment of the tax base. It is the purpose of this ordinance to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare by minimizing these losses and disruptions. (b) National Flood Insurance Program Compliance. This ordinance is adopted to comply with the rules and regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program codified as 44 Code of Federal Regulations Parts 59 -78, as amended, so as to maintain the community’s eligibility in the National Flood Insurance Program. Sec. 36-293. General Provisions. (a) How to Use This Ordinance. This ordinance adopts the floodplain maps applicable to the City of St. Louis Park includes three floodplain districts: Floodway, Flood Fringe, and General Floodplain. (1) Where Floodway and Flood Fringe districts are delineated on the floodplain maps, the standards in Sections 4 or 5 will apply, depending on the location of a property. (2) Locations where Floodway and Flood Fringe districts are not delineated on the floodplain maps are considered to fall within the General Floodplain district. Within the General Floodplain district, the Floodway District standards in Section 4 apply unless the floodway boundary is determined, according to the process outlined in Section 6. Once the floodway boundary is determined, the Flood Fringe District standards in Section 5 may apply outside the floodway. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Title: Floodplain District Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments Page 3 (b) Lands to Which Ordinance Applies. This ordinance applies to all lands within the jurisdiction of St. Louis Park shown on the Official Zoning Map and/or the attachments to the map as being located within the boundaries of the Floodway, Flood Fringe, or General Floodplain Districts. (1) The Floodway, Flood Fringe and General Floodplain Districts are overlay districts that are superimposed on all existing zoning districts. The standards imposed in the overlay districts are in addition to any other requirements in this ordinance. In case of a conflict, the more restrictive standards will apply. (c) Incorporation of Maps by Reference. The following maps together with all attached material are hereby adopted by reference and declared to be a part of the Official Zoning Map and this ordinance. The attached material includes the Flood Insurance Study for Hennepin County, Minnesota, and Incorporated Areas, dated November 4, 2016 and the Flood Insurance Rate Map panels enumerated below, dated November 4, 2016, all prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. These materials are on file in the office of the Zoning Administrator. Effective Flood Insurance Rate Map panels: 27053C0331F 27053C0332F 27053C0334F 27053C0342F 27053C0351F 27053C0352F 27053C0353F 27053C0354F 27053C0361F 27053C0362F (d) Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation. The regulatory flood protection elevation (RFPE) is an elevation no lower than two feet above the elevation of the regional flood plus any increases in flood elevation caused by encroachments on the floodplain that result from designation of a floodway. (e) Interpretation. The boundaries of the zoning districts are determined by scaling distances on the Flood Insurance Rate Map. (1) Where a conflict exists between the floodplain limits illustrated on the official zoning map and actual field conditions, the flood elevations shall be the governing factor. The Zoning Administrator must interpret the boundary location based on the ground elevations that existed on the site on the date of the first National Flood Insurance Program map showing the area within the regulatory floodplain, and other available technical data. (2) Persons contesting the location of the district boundaries will be given a reasonable opportunity to present their case to the Board of Zoning Appeals and City Council and to submit technical evidence. (f) Abrogation and Greater Restrictions. It is not intended by this ordinance to repeal, abrogate, or impair any existing easements, covenants, or other private agreements. However, where this ordinance imposes greater restrictions, the provisions of this ordinance prevail. All other ordinances inconsistent with this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of the inconsistency only. (g) Warning and Disclaimer of Liability. This ordinance does not imply that areas outside the floodplain districts or land uses permitted within such districts will be free from flooding or flood damages. This ordinance does not create liability on the part of the City of St. Louis Park or its officers or employees for any flood damages that result from reliance on this ordinance or any administrative decision lawfully made hereunder. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Title: Floodplain District Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments Page 4 (h) No stage increase permitted. No structure, fill, deposit, obstruction or storage of materials or equipment shall be allowed in any floodway, or general floodplain district which will cause any increase in the stage of the 100-year flood or will cause an increase in flood damages in the reaches affected. (i) Compensating storage. The city may approve such structure, fill, deposit, obstruction or storage of materials or equipment if it otherwise complies with the provisions of this chapter and provision is made for compensating storage of floodwaters displaced by the activity listed in this subsection (f). Such compensating storage shall be located where it will achieve the goal of eliminating a stage increase. Sec. 36-294. Definitions. Unless specifically defined below, words or phrases used in this ordinance must be interpreted according to common usage and so as to give this ordinance its most reasonable application. If any of the words defined are used elsewhere in this chapter, their meaning shall be those assigned by section 36-4. Base Flood Elevation means the elevation of the “regional flood.” The term “base flood elevation” is used in the flood insurance survey. Basement means any area of a structure, including crawl spaces, having its floor or base subgrade (below ground level) on all four sides, regardless of the depth of excavation below ground level. Equal Degree of Encroachment means a method of determining the location of floodway boundaries so that floodplain lands on both sides of a stream are capable of conveying a proportionate share of flood flows. Flood means a temporary increase in the flow or stage of a stream or in the stage of a wetland or lake that results in the inundation of normally dry areas. Flood Frequency means the frequency for which it is expected that a specific flood stage or discharge may be equaled or exceeded. Flood Fringe means the portion of the Special Flood Hazard Area (one percent annual chance flood) located outside of the floodway. Flood fringe is synonymous with the term “floodway fringe” used in the Flood Insurance Study for Hennepin County, Minnesota. Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) means an official map of a community, on which the Administrator has delineated both the special hazard areas and the risk premium zones applicable to the community. Flood Prone Area means any land susceptible to being inundated by water from any source (see “Flood”). Floodplain means the beds proper and the areas adjoining a wetland, lake or watercourse which have been or hereafter may be covered by the regional flood. Floodproofing means a combination of structural provisions, changes, or adjustments to properties and structures subject to flooding, primarily for the reduction or elimination of flood damages. Floodway means the bed of a wetland or lake and the channel of a watercourse and those portions of the adjoining floodplain which are reasonably required to carry or store the regional flood discharge. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Title: Floodplain District Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments Page 5 Lowest Floor means the lowest floor of the lowest enclosed area (including basement). An unfinished or flood resistant enclosure, used solely for parking of vehicles, building access, or storage in an area other than a basement area, is not considered a building’s lowest floor; provided, that such enclosure is not built so as to render the structure in violation of the applicable non-elevation design requirements of 44 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 60.3. New Construction means structures, including additions and improvements, and placement of manufactured homes, for which the start of construction commenced on or after the effective date of this ordinance. Obstruction means any dam, wall, wharf, embankment, levee, dike, pile, abutment, projection, excavation, channel modification, culvert, building, wire, fence, stockpile, refuse, fill, structure, or matter in, along, across, or projecting into any channel, watercourse, or regulatory floodplain which may impede, retard, or change the direction of the flow of water, either in itself or by catching or collecting debris carried by such water. One Hundred Year Floodplain means lands inundated by the “Regional Flood” (see definition). Reach means a hydraulic engineering term to describe a longitudinal segment of a stream or river influenced by a natural or man-made obstruction. In an urban area, the segment of a stream or river between two consecutive bridge crossings would most typically constitute a reach. Regional Flood means a flood which is representative of large floods known to have occurred generally in Minnesota and reasonably characteristic of what can be expected to occur on an average frequency in the magnitude of the 1% chance or 100-year recurrence interval. Regional flood is synonymous with the term "base flood" used in a flood insurance study. Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation (RFPE) means an elevation not less than two feet above the elevation of the regional flood plus any increases in flood elevation caused by encroachments on the floodplain that result from designation of a floodway. Repetitive Loss means flood related damages sustained by a structure on two separate occasions during a ten year period for which the cost of repairs at the time of each such flood event on the average equals or exceeds 25% of the market value of the structure before the damage occurred. Special Flood Hazard Area means a term used for flood insurance purposes synonymous with “One Hundred Year Floodplain.” Start of Construction means includes substantial improvement, and means the actual start of construction, repair, reconstruction, rehabilitation, addition, placement or other improvement that occurred before the permit’s expiration date. The actual start is either the first placement of permanent construction of a structure on a site, such as the pouring of slab or footings, the installation of piles, the construction of columns, or any work beyond the stage of excavation; or the placement of a manufactured home on a foundation. Permanent construction does not include land preparation, such as clearing, grading and filling; nor does it include the installation of streets and/or walkways; nor does it include excavation for a basement, footings, piers, foundations, or the erection of temporary forms; nor does it include the installation on the property of accessory buildings, such as garages or sheds not occupied as dwelling units or not part of the main structure. For a substantial improvement, the actual start of construction means the first alteration of any wall, ceiling, floor, or other structural part of a building, whether or not that alteration affects the external dimensions of the building. Structure means anything constructed or erected on the ground or attached to the ground or on-site utilities, including, but not limited to, buildings, factories, sheds, detached garages, cabins, City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Title: Floodplain District Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments Page 6 manufactured homes, recreational vehicles not meeting the exemption criteria specified in Section 36- 294(b)(1) of this ordinance and other similar items. Substantial Damage means damage of any origin sustained by a structure where the cost of restoring the structure to its before damaged condition would equal or exceed 50 percent of the market value of the structure before the damage occurred. Substantial Improvement means within any consecutive 365-day period, any reconstruction, rehabilitation (including normal maintenance and repair), repair after damage, addition, or other improvement of a structure, the cost of which equals or exceeds 50 percent of the market value of the structure before the “start of construction” of the improvement. This term includes structures that have incurred “substantial damage,” regardless of the actual repair work performed. The term does not, however, include either: (1) Any project for improvement of a structure to correct existing violations of state or local health, sanitary, or safety code specifications which have been identified by the local code enforcement official and which are the minimum necessary to assure safe living conditions. (2) Any alteration of a “historic structure,” provided that the alteration will not preclude the structure’s continued designation as a “historic structure.” For the purpose of this ordinance, “historic structure” is as defined in 44 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 59.1. Sec. 36-295. Establishment of zoning districts. (a) Districts. (1) Floodway District (FW). The Floodway District includes those areas within Zones AE that have a floodway delineated as shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Map adopted in Section 36-292(c). For lakes, wetlands and other basins within Zones AE that do not have a floodway delineated, the Floodway District also includes those areas that are at or below the ordinary high water level as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 103G.005, subdivision 14. (2) Flood Fringe District (FF). The Flood Fringe District includes areas within Zones AE that have a floodway delineated on the Flood Insurance Rate Map adopted in Section 36-292(c), but are located outside of the floodway. For lakes, wetlands and other basins within Zones AE that do not have a floodway delineated, the Flood Fringe District also includes those areas below the 1% annual chance (100-year) flood elevation but above the ordinary high water level as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 103G.005, subdivision 14. (3) General Floodplain District (GF). The General Floodplain District includes those areas within Zones A and AH that do not have a delineated floodway as shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Map adopted in Section 36-292(c). (b) Applicability. Within the floodplain districts established in this ordinance, the use, size, type and location of development must comply with the terms of this ordinance and other applicable regulations. In no cases shall floodplain development adversely affect the efficiency or unduly restrict the capacity of the channels or floodways of any tributaries to the main stream, drainage ditches, or any other drainage facilities or systems. (c) Compliance. Provisions for compliance are as follows: City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Title: Floodplain District Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments Page 7 (1) Recreational vehicles that do not meet the exemption criteria specified in Section 36- 294(b)(1)a below shall be subject to the provisions of this Ordinance and as specifically spelled out in Sections 36-294(b)(1)c below. a. Exemption - Recreational vehicles are exempt from the provisions of this Ordinance if they are placed in any of the areas listed in Section 36-294(b)(1)b below and further they meet the following criteria: 1. Have current licenses required for highway use. 2. Are highway ready meaning on wheels or the internal jacking system, are attached to the site only by quick disconnect type utilities commonly used in campgrounds and recreational vehicle parks and the recreational vehicle has no permanent structural type additions attached to it. 3. The recreational vehicle and associated use must be permissible in any preexisting, underlying zoning use district. b. Areas Exempted For Placement of Recreational Vehicles: 1. Individual lots or parcels of record. 2. Existing commercial recreational vehicle parks or campgrounds. 3. Existing condominium type associations. c. Recreational vehicles exempted in Section 36-294(b)(1)a lose this exemption when development occurs on the parcel exceeding $500 for a structural addition to the recreational vehicle or exceeding $500 for an accessory structure such as a garage or storage building. The recreational vehicle and all additions and accessory structures will then be treated as a new structure and shall be subject to the elevation/flood proofing requirements and the use of land restrictions specified in Section 36-294(c) & Section 36-294(d) of this Ordinance. There shall be no development or improvement on the parcel or attachment to the recreational vehicle that hinders the removal of the recreational vehicle to a flood free location should flooding occur. (2) Modifications, additions, structural alterations normal maintenance and repair, or repair after damage to existing nonconforming structures and nonconforming uses of structures or land are regulated by the general provisions of this chapter. (d) Annexations. The Flood Insurance Rate Map panels adopted by reference into Section 36-292(c) above may include floodplain areas that lie outside of the corporate boundaries of the City of St. Louis Park at the time of adoption of this ordinance. If any of these floodplain land areas are annexed into the City of St. Louis Park after the date of adoption of this ordinance, the newly annexed floodplain lands will be subject to the provisions of this ordinance immediately upon the date of annexation. Sec. 36-296 Floodway district (FW). Within the floodway district, all uses not listed as permitted uses or conditional uses shall be prohibited. No new structure or land shall hereafter be used and no structure shall be located, extended, converted or structurally altered without full compliance with the terms of this chapter and other applicable regulations which apply to uses within the jurisdiction of this chapter. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Title: Floodplain District Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments Page 8 (a) Permitted Uses. The following uses, subject to the standards set forth in Section 36-295(b), are permitted uses if otherwise allowed in the underlying zoning district or any applicable overlay district: (1) Outdoor plant nurseries, horticulture, forestry, sod farming, and wild crop harvesting. (2) Industrial-commercial loading areas, and parking areas. (3) Open space uses and public golf courses, tennis courts, driving ranges, archery ranges, picnic grounds, boat launching ramps, swimming areas, parks, wildlife and nature preserves, fish hatcheries, fishing areas, and single or multiple purpose recreational trails. (4) Residential lawns, gardens, parking areas, and play areas. (5) Railroads, streets, bridges, utility transmission lines and pipelines, provided that the Department of Natural Resources’ Area Hydrologist is notified at least ten days prior to issuance of any permit. (b) Standards for Floodway Permitted Uses. (1) The use must have a low flood damage potential. (2) The use shall be permissible in the underlying zoning district. (3) The use must not obstruct flood flows or cause any increase in flood elevations and must not involve structures, obstructions, or storage of materials or equipment. (4) Any facility that will be used by employees or the general public must be designed with a flood warning system that provides adequate time for evacuation if the area is inundated to a depth and velocity such that the depth (in feet) multiplied by the velocity (in feet per second) would exceed a product of four upon occurrence of the regional (1% chance) flood. (c) Conditional Uses. The following uses shall require a conditional use permit following the standards and procedures set forth in Section 36-300(c) of this ordinance and further subject to the standards set forth in Section 36-295(d), if otherwise allowed in the underlying zoning district or any applicable overlay district. (1) Structures and parking lots accessory to the uses listed in Section 36-295(a)(1) - Section 36- 295(a)(3), above and the uses listed in Section 36-295(c)(2) - Section 36-295(c)(3) below. (2) Docks, piers, wharves, and water control structures. (3) Placement of fill or construction of fences that obstruct flood flows. (4) Structural works for flood control such as levees, dikes and floodwalls, constructed to any height where the intent is to protect individual structures for a frequency flood event equal to or less than the 10-year frequency flood event. (d) Standards for Floodway Conditional Uses. The standards for floodway conditional uses are as follows (1) All Uses. A conditional use must not cause any increase in the stage of the 1% chance or regional flood or cause an increase in flood damages in the reach or reaches affected. (2) The conditional use shall be permissible in the underlying zoning district. (3) Fill; Storage of Materials and Equipment: City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Title: Floodplain District Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments Page 9 a. The storage or processing of materials that are, in time of flooding, flammable, explosive, or potentially injurious to human, animal, or plant life is prohibited. b. Fill, dredge spoil, and other similar materials deposited or stored in the floodplain must be protected from erosion by vegetative cover, mulching, riprap or other acceptable method. Permanent sand and gravel operations and similar uses must be covered by a long-term site development plan. c. Temporary placement of fill, other materials, or equipment which would cause an increase to the stage of the 1% percent chance or regional flood may only be allowed if the City Council has approved a plan that assures removal of the materials from the floodway based upon the flood warning time available. (4) Accessory Structures. Accessory structures, as identified in Section 36-295(c)(1), may be permitted, provided that: a. Structures are not intended for human habitation; b. Structures will have a low flood damage potential; c. Structures will be constructed an placed so as to offer a minimal obstruction to the flow of flood waters; d. Service utilities, such as electrical and heating equipment, within these structures must be elevated to or above the regulatory flood protection elevation or properly floodproofed; e. Structures must be elevated on fill or structurally dry floodproofed in accordance with the FP1 or FP2 floodproofing classifications in the State Building Code. All floodproofed structures must be adequately anchored to prevent flotation, collapse or lateral movement and designed to equalize hydrostatic flood forces on exterior walls. f. As an alternative, an accessory structure may be internally/wet floodproofed to the FP3 or FP4 floodproofing classifications in the State Building Code, provided the accessory structure constitutes a minimal investment and does not exceed 576 square feet in size. Designs for meeting this requirement must either be certified by a registered professional engineer or meet or exceed the following criteria: 1. To allow for the equalization of hydrostatic pressure, there must be a minimum of two “automatic” openings in the outside walls of the structure, with a total net area of not less than one square inch for every square foot of enclosed area subject to flooding; and 2. There must be openings on at least two sides of the structure and the bottom of all openings must be no higher than one foot above the lowest adjacent grade to the structure. Using human intervention to open a garage door prior to flooding will not satisfy this requirement for automatic openings.4.44. Structural works for flood control that will change the course, current or cross section of protected wetlands or public waters are subject to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 103G.245. (5) A levee, dike or floodwall constructed in the floodway must not cause an increase to the 1% chance or regional flood. The technical analysis must assume equal conveyance or storage loss on both sides of a stream. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Title: Floodplain District Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments Page 10 (6) Floodway developments must not adversely affect the hydraulic capacity of the channel and adjoining floodplain of any tributary watercourse or drainage system. Sec. 36-297 Flood fringe district (FF). (a) Permitted Uses. Permitted uses are those uses of land or structures allowed in the underlying zoning district(s) that comply with the standards in Section 36-296(b). (b) Standards for Flood Fringe Permitted Uses. (1) All structures, including accessory structures, must be elevated on fill so that the lowest floor including basement floor, is at or above the regulatory flood protection elevation. The finished fill elevation for structures shall be no lower than the regulatory flood protection elevation and the fill shall extend at such elevation at least 15 feet beyond the outside limits of the structure erected thereon. (2) For all structures constructed after June 15, 1998, the lowest floor elevations shall be no lower than the regulatory flood protection elevation. For all structures existing on June 15, 1998, and additions to structures existing on June 15, 1998, the lowest floor shall be no lower than one foot below the regulatory flood protection elevation. (3) Accessory Structures. As an alternative to the fill requirements of Section 36-296(b)(1), structures accessory to the uses identified in Section 36-296(a). may be permitted to be internally/wet floodproofed to the FP3 or FP4 floodproofing classifications in the State Building Code, provided that: a. The accessory structure constitutes a minimal investment, does not exceed 576 square feet in size, and is only used for parking and storage. b. All portions of floodproofed accessory structures below the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation must be: 1. Adequately anchored to prevent flotation, collapse or lateral movement and designed to equalize hydrostatic flood forces on exterior walls, 2. Constructed with materials resistant to flood damage, and 3. Must have all service utilities be water-tight or elevated to above the regulatory flood protection elevation c. Designs for meeting this requirement must either be certified by a registered professional engineer or meet or exceed the following criteria: 1. To allow for the equalization of hydrostatic pressure, there must be a minimum of two “automatic” openings in the outside walls of the structure, with a total net area of not less than one square inch for every square foot of enclosed area subject to flooding; and 2. There must be openings on at least two sides of the structure and the bottom of all openings must be no higher than one foot above the lowest adjacent grade to the structure. Using human intervention to open a garage door prior to flooding will not satisfy this requirement for automatic openings. (4) The cumulative placement of fill or similar material on a parcel must not exceed 400 cubic yards, unless the fill is specifically intended to elevate a structure in accordance with Section City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Title: Floodplain District Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments Page 11 36-296(b)(1) of this ordinance, or if allowed as a conditional use under Section 36-296(c)(3) below. (5) The storage of any materials or equipment must be elevated on fill to the regulatory flood protection elevation. (6) All service utilities, including ductwork, must be elevated or water-tight to prevent infiltration of floodwaters. (7) The storage or processing of materials that are, in time of flooding, flammable, explosive, or potentially injurious to human, animal, or plant life is prohibited. (8) Compacted fill; protected slopes. Fill shall be properly compacted and the slopes shall be properly protected by the use of rip rap, vegetative cover or other acceptable methods. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has established criteria for removing the special flood hazard area designation for certain structures properly elevated on fill above the 100-year flood elevation. FEMA's requirements incorporate specific fill compaction and side slope protection standards for multistructure or multilot developments. These standards should be investigated prior to the initiation of site preparation if a change of special flood hazard area designation will be requested. (9) Vehicular access. All new principal structures must have vehicular access at or above an elevation not more than two feet below the regulatory flood protection elevation. (10) Commercial uses. Accessory uses such as yards, railroad tracks, and parking lots may be at an elevation lower than the regulatory flood protection elevation. However, any facilities used by employees or the general public must be designed with a flood warning system that provides adequate time for evacuation if the area is inundated to a depth and velocity such that the depth (in feet) multiplied by the velocity (in feet per second) would exceed a product of four upon occurrence of the regional (1% chance) flood. (11) Hydraulic capacity. Floodplain developments shall not adversely affect the hydraulic capacity of the channel and adjoining floodplain of any tributary watercourse or drainage system where a floodway or other encroachment limit has not been specified on the official zoning map. (12) Manufacturing and industrial uses. Certain accessory land uses such as yards and parking lots may be at lower elevations subject to requirements set out in subsection (b)(10) of this section. In considering permit applications, consideration shall be given to needs of an industry whose business requires that it be located in floodplain areas. (13) Anchoring. All manufactured homes must be securely anchored to an adequately anchored foundation system that resists flotation, collapse and lateral movement. Methods of anchoring may include, but are not limited to, use of over-the-top or frame ties to ground anchors. This requirement is in addition to applicable state or local anchoring requirements for resisting wind forces. (c) Conditional Uses. The following uses and activities may be allowed as conditional uses, if allowed in the underlying zoning district(s) or any applicable overlay district, following the procedures in Section 36-300(c) of this ordinance. (1) Any structure that is not elevated on fill or floodproofed in accordance with Section 36- 296(b)(1) and Section 36-296(b)(3) of this ordinance. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Title: Floodplain District Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments Page 12 (2) Storage of any material or equipment below the regulatory flood protection elevation. (3) The cumulative placement of more than 400 cubic yards of fill when the fill is not being used to elevate a structure in accordance with Section 36-296(b)(1) of this ordinance. (4) The use of methods to elevate structures above the regulatory flood protection elevation, including stilts, pilings, parallel walls, or above-grade, enclosed areas such as crawl spaces or tuck under garages, shall meet the standards in Section 36-296(d)(6). (d) Standards for Flood Fringe Conditional Uses. (1) The standards listed in Section 36-296(b)(5) through Section 36-296(b)(13) apply to all conditional uses. (2) Basements, as defined by Section 36-296 of this ordinance, are subject to the following: a. Residential basement construction is not allowed below the regulatory flood protection elevation. b. Non-residential basements may be allowed below the regulatory flood protection elevation provided the basement is structurally dry floodproofed in accordance with Section 36-296(d)(3) of this ordinance. (3) All areas of nonresidential structures, including basements, to be placed below the regulatory flood protection elevation must be floodproofed in accordance with the structurally dry floodproofing classifications in the State Building Code. Structurally dry floodproofing must meet the FP1 or FP2 floodproofing classification in the State Building Code, which requires making the structure watertight with the walls substantially impermeable to the passage of water and with structural components capable of resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and the effects of buoyancy. (4) The placement of more than 400 cubic yards of fill or other similar material on a parcel (other than for the purpose of elevating a structure to the regulatory flood protection elevation) must comply with an approved erosion/sedimentation control plan. a. The plan must clearly specify methods to be used to stabilize the fill on site for a flood event at a minimum of the regional (1% chance) flood event. b. The plan must be prepared and certified by a registered professional engineer or other qualified individual acceptable to the City Council. c. The plan may incorporate alternative procedures for removal of the material from the floodplain if adequate flood warning time exists. (5) Storage of materials and equipment. a. The storage or processing of materials that are, in time of flooding, flammable, explosive or potentially injurious to human, animal or plant life is prohibited. b. Storage of other materials or equipment may be allowed if readily removable from the area within the time available after a flood warning and in a manner required by a plan approved by the city. (6) Alternative elevation methods other than the use of fill may be utilized to elevate a structure's lowest floor above the regulatory flood protection elevation. The base or floor of an enclosed area shall be considered above-grade and not a structure’s basement or lowest City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Title: Floodplain District Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments Page 13 floor if: 1) the enclosed area is above-grade on at least one side of the structure; 2) it is designed to internally flood and is constructed with flood resistant materials; and 3) it is used solely for parking of vehicles, building access or storage. The above-noted alternative elevation methods are subject to the following additional standards: a. Design and Certification - The structure’s design and as-built condition must be certified by a registered professional engineer as being in compliance with the general design standards of the State Building Code and, specifically, that all electrical, heating, ventilation, plumbing and air conditioning equipment and other service facilities must be at or above the regulatory flood protection elevation or be designed to prevent flood water from entering or accumulating within these components during times of flooding. b. Specific Standards for Above-grade, Enclosed Areas - Above-grade, fully enclosed areas such as crawl spaces or tuck under garages must be designed to internally flood and the design plans must stipulate: 1. The minimum area of openings in the walls where internal flooding is to be used as a floodproofing technique. There shall be a minimum of two openings on at least two sides of the structure and the bottom of all openings shall be no higher than one foot above grade. The automatic openings shall have a minimum net area of not less than one square inch for every square foot of enclosed area subject to flooding unless a registered professional engineer or architect certifies that a smaller net area would suffice. The automatic openings may be equipped with screens, louvers, valves, or other coverings or devices provided that they permit the automatic entry and exit of flood waters without any form of human intervention; and 2. That the enclosed area will be designed of flood resistant materials in accordance with the FP3 or FP4 classifications in the State Building Code and shall be used solely for building access, parking of vehicles or storage. Sec. 36-298 General floodplain district (GF) (a) Permitted Uses. (1) The uses listed in Section 36-295(a) of this ordinance, Floodway District Permitted Uses, are permitted uses. (2) All other uses are subject to the floodway/flood fringe evaluation criteria specified in Section 36-297(b) below. Section 36-295 applies if the proposed use is determined to be in the Floodway District. Section 36-296 applies if the proposed use is determined to be in the Flood Fringe District. (b) Procedures for Floodway and Flood Fringe Determinations. (1) Upon receipt of an application for a permit or other approval within the General Floodplain District, the applicant shall be required to furnish such information deemed necessary by the Zoning Administrator for the determination of the regulatory flood protection elevation and whether the proposed use is within the floodway or flood fringe district. This information may include the following: a. A plan (surface view) showing elevations or contours of the ground; pertinent structure, fill or storage elevations; size, location and spatial arrangement of all proposed and existing structures on the site; and the location and elevations of streets. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Title: Floodplain District Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments Page 14 b. The drainage area contributing to the waterbody and existing type and level of development in the drainage area. c. A typical valley cross-section(s) showing the channel of the stream, elevation of land areas adjoining each side of the channel, cross-sectional areas to be occupied by the proposed development, and high water information. d. Photographs showing existing land uses, vegetation upstream and downstream, and soil types. e. Profile showing the slope of the bottom of the channel or flow line of the stream for at least 500 feet in either direction from the proposed development. (2) If regional flood elevation and floodway data are not readily available, the applicant must furnish additional information, as needed, to determine the regulatory flood protection elevation and whether the proposed use would fall within the Floodway or Flood Fringe District. Information must be consistent with accepted hydrological and hydraulic engineering standards and the standards in Section 36-297(b)(3) below. (3) The determination of floodway and flood fringe must include the following components, as applicable: a. Estimate the peak discharge of the regional (1% chance) flood. b. Calculate the water surface profile of the regional flood based upon a hydraulic analysis of the stream channel and overbank areas. c. Compute the floodway necessary to convey or store the regional flood without increasing flood stages more than one-half (0.5) foot. A lesser stage increase than 0.5 foot is required if, as a result of the stage increase, increased flood damages would result. An equal degree of encroachment on both sides of the stream within the reach must be assumed in computing floodway boundaries. (4) The Zoning Administrator will review the submitted information and assess the technical evaluation and the recommended Floodway and/or Flood Fringe District boundary. The assessment must include the cumulative effects of previous floodway encroachments. The Zoning Administrator may seek technical assistance from a designated engineer or other expert person or agency, including the Department of Natural Resources. Based on this assessment, the Zoning Administrator may approve or deny the application. (5) Once the Floodway and Flood Fringe District boundaries have been determined, the Zoning Administrator must process the permit application consistent with the applicable provisions of Section 36-295 and Section 36-296 of this ordinance. Sec. 36-299 Land development standards. (a) In General. Recognizing that flood prone areas may exist outside of the designated floodplain districts, the requirements of this section apply to all land within the City of St. Louis Park. (b) Subdivisions. No land may be subdivided which is unsuitable for reasons of flooding or inadequate drainage, water supply or sewage treatment facilities. (1) All lots within the floodplain districts must be able to contain a building site outside of the Floodway District at or above the regulatory flood protection elevation. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Title: Floodplain District Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments Page 15 (2) All subdivisions must have road access both to the subdivision and to the individual building sites no lower than two feet below the regulatory flood protection elevation. (3) For all subdivisions in the floodplain, the Floodway and Flood Fringe District boundaries, the regulatory flood protection elevation and the required elevation of all access roads must be clearly labeled on all required subdivision drawings and platting documents. (4) In the General Floodplain District, applicants must provide the information required in Section 36-295 of this ordinance to determine the regional flood elevation, the Floodway and Flood Fringe District boundaries and the regulatory flood protection elevation for the subdivision site. (5) If a subdivision proposal or other proposed new development is in a flood prone area, any such proposal must be reviewed to assure that: a. All such proposals are consistent with the need to minimize flood damage within the flood prone area, b. All public utilities and facilities, such as sewer, gas, electrical, and water systems are located and constructed to minimize or eliminate flood damage, and c. Adequate drainage is provided to reduce exposure of flood hazard. (c) Building Sites. If a proposed building site is in a flood prone area, all new construction and substantial improvements (including the placement of manufactured homes) must be: (1) Designed (or modified) and adequately anchored to prevent floatation, collapse, or lateral movement of the structure resulting from hydrodynamic and hydrostatic loads, including the effects of buoyancy; (2) Constructed with materials and utility equipment resistant to flood damage; (3) Constructed by methods and practices that minimize flood damage; and (4) Constructed with electrical, heating, ventilation, plumbing, and air conditioning equipment and other service facilities that are designed and/or located so as to prevent water from entering or accumulating within the components during conditions of flooding. Sec. 36-300 Public utilities, railroads, roads, and bridges. (a) Public Utilities. All public utilities and facilities such as gas, electrical, sewer, and water supply systems to be located in the floodplain must be floodproofed in accordance with the State Building Code or elevated to the regulatory flood protection elevation. (b) Public Transportation Facilities. Railroad tracks, roads, and bridges to be located within the floodplain must comply with Section 36-295 and Section 36-296 of this ordinance. These transportation facilities must be elevated to the regulatory flood protection elevation where failure or interruption of these facilities would result in danger to the public health or safety or where such facilities are essential to the orderly functioning of the area. Minor or auxiliary roads or railroads may be constructed at a lower elevation where failure or interruption of transportation services would not endanger the public health or safety. (c) On-site Water Supply and Sewage Treatment Systems. Where public utilities are not provided: City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Title: Floodplain District Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments Page 16 1) On-site water supply systems must be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the systems and are subject to the provisions in Minnesota Rules Chapter 4725.4350, as amended; and 2) New or replacement on-site sewage treatment systems must be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the systems and discharges from the systems into flood waters, they must not be subject to impairment or contamination during times of flooding, and are subject to the provisions in Minnesota Rules Chapter 7080.2270, as amended. Sec. 36-301 Administration. (a) Zoning Administrator. A Zoning Administrator or other official designated by the City Council must administer and enforce this ordinance. (b) Permit Requirements. (1) Permit Required. A permit must be obtained from the Zoning Administrator prior to conducting the following activities: a. The erection, addition, modification, rehabilitation, or alteration of any building, structure, or portion thereof. b. The use or change of use of a building, structure, or land. c. The construction of a dam, fence, or on-site septic system. d. The change or extension of a nonconforming use. e. The repair of a structure that has been damaged by flood, fire, tornado, or any other source. f. The placement of fill, excavation of materials, or the storage of materials or equipment within the floodplain. g. Relocation or alteration of a watercourse (including new or replacement culverts and bridges), unless a public waters work permit has been applied for. (2) Application for Permit. Permit applications must be submitted to the Zoning Administrator on forms provided by the Zoning Administrator. The permit application must include the following as applicable: a. A site plan showing all pertinent dimensions, existing or proposed buildings, structures, and significant natural features having an influence on the permit. b. Location of fill or storage of materials in relation to the stream channel. c. Copies of any required municipal, county, state or federal permits or approvals. d. Other relevant information requested by the Zoning Administrator as necessary to properly evaluate the permit application. (3) Certificate of Zoning Compliance for a New, Altered, or Nonconforming Use. No building, land or structure may be occupied or used in any manner until a certificate of zoning compliance has been issued by the Zoning Administrator stating that the use of the building or land conforms to the requirements of this ordinance. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Title: Floodplain District Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments Page 17 (4) Certification. The applicant is required to submit certification by a registered professional engineer, registered architect, or registered land surveyor that the finished fill and building elevations were accomplished in compliance with the provisions of this ordinance. Floodproofing measures must be certified by a registered professional engineer or registered architect. (5) Record of First Floor Elevation. The Zoning Administrator must maintain a record of the elevation of the lowest floor (including basement) of all new structures and alterations or additions to existing structures in the floodplain. The Zoning Administrator must also maintain a record of the elevation to which structures and alterations or additions to structures are floodproofed. (6) Notifications for Watercourse Alterations. Before authorizing any alteration or relocation of a river or stream, the Zoning Administrator must notify adjacent communities. If the applicant has applied for a permit to work in public waters pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 103G.245, this will suffice as adequate notice. A copy of the notification must also be submitted to the Chicago Regional Office of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (7) Notification to FEMA When Physical Changes Increase or Decrease Base Flood Elevations. As soon as is practicable, but not later than six months after the date such supporting information becomes available, the Zoning Administrator must notify the Chicago Regional Office of FEMA of the changes by submitting a copy of the relevant technical or scientific data. (c) Factors for Conditional Use Approval. (1) Administrative Review. An application for a conditional use permit under the provisions of this ordinance will be processed and reviewed in accordance with Section(s) 36-33 Conditional Use Permits (CUP) of the zoning ordinance. (2) The factors upon which the decision of the city council shall be based when considering conditional use applications are as follows: a. All relevant factors specified in other sections of this chapter. b. The danger to life and property due to increased flood heights or velocities caused by encroachments. c. The danger that materials may be swept onto other lands or downstream to the injury of others or they may block bridges, culverts or other hydraulic structures. d. The proposed water supply and sanitation systems and the ability of these systems to prevent disease, contamination and unsanitary conditions. e. The susceptibility of the proposed facility and its contents to flood damage and the effect of such damage on the individual owner. f. The importance of the services provided by the proposed facility to the community. g. The requirements of the facility for a waterfront location. h. The availability of alternative locations not subject to flooding for the proposed use. i. The compatibility of the proposed use with existing development and the development anticipated in the foreseeable future. j. The relationship of the proposed use to the comprehensive plan and floodplain management program for the area. k. The safety of access to the property in times of flood for ordinary and emergency vehicles. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Title: Floodplain District Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments Page 18 l. The expected heights, velocity, duration, rate of rise, and sediment transport of the floodwaters expected at the site. m. Such other factors which are relevant to the purposes of this division. (3) Conditions Attached to Conditional Use Permits. Upon consideration of the factors listed above and the purpose of this Ordinance, the city council shall attach such conditions to the granting of conditional use permits as it deems necessary to fulfill the purposes of this Ordinance. Such conditions may include, but are not limited to, the following: a. Modification of waste treatment and water supply facilities. b. Limitations on period of use, occupancy, and operation. c. Imposition of operational controls, sureties, and deed restrictions. d. Requirements for construction of channel modifications, compensatory storage, dikes, levees, and other protective measures. e. Flood proofing measures, in accordance with the State Building Code and this Ordinance. The applicant shall submit a plan or document certified by a registered professional engineer or architect that the flood proofing measures are consistent with the regulatory flood protection elevation and associated flood factors for the particular area. (4) Submittal of Hearing Notices to the Department of Natural Resources (DNR). The Zoning Administrator must submit hearing notices for proposed conditional uses to the DNR sufficiently in advance to provide at least ten days’ notice of the hearing. The notice may be sent by electronic mail or U.S. Mail to the respective DNR area hydrologist. (5) Submittal of Final Decisions to the DNR. A copy of all decisions granting conditional uses must be forwarded to the DNR within ten days of such action. The notice may be sent by electronic mail or U.S. Mail to the respective DNR area hydrologist. Sec. 36-302 Nonconformities. (a) Continuance of Nonconformities. A use, structure, or occupancy of land which was lawful before the passage or amendment of this ordinance but which is not in conformity with the provisions of this ordinance may be continued subject to the following conditions. Historic structures, as defined in Section 36-293 of this ordinance, are subject to the provisions of Section 36-301(1) through Section 36-301(6) of this ordinance. (1) A nonconforming use, structure, or occupancy must not be expanded, changed, enlarged, or altered in a way that increases its nonconformity, its flood damage potential or degree of obstruction to flood flows except as provided in Section 36-301(2) below. Expansion or enlargement of uses, structures or occupancies within the Floodway District is prohibited. (2) Any addition or structural alteration to a nonconforming structure or nonconforming use that would result in increasing its flood damage potential must be protected to the regulatory flood protection elevation in accordance with any of the elevation on fill or floodproofing techniques (i.e., FP1 thru FP4 floodproofing classifications) allowable in the State Building Code, except as further restricted in Section 36-301(3) and Section 36-301(7) below. (3) The cost of any structural alterations or additions to any nonconforming structure over the life of the structure shall not exceed 50 percent of the market value of the structure unless the conditions of this section are satisfied. The cost of all structural alterations and additions constructed since the adoption of the city's initial floodplain controls must be calculated into today's current cost which will include all costs such as construction materials and a City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Title: Floodplain District Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments Page 19 reasonable cost placed on all labor. If the current cost of all previous and proposed alterations and additions exceeds 50 percent of the current market value of the structure, then the structure must meet the standards of this chapter for new structure. (4) If any nonconforming use, or any use of a nonconforming structure, is discontinued for more than one year, any future use of the premises must conform to this ordinance. The Assessor must notify the Zoning Administrator in writing of instances of nonconformities that have been discontinued for a period of more than one year. (5) If any nonconformity is substantially damaged, as defined in Section 36-293 of this ordinance, it may not be reconstructed except in conformity with the provisions of this ordinance. The applicable provisions for establishing new uses or new structures in Section 36-295 or Section 36-296 will apply depending upon whether the use or structure is in the Floodway or Flood Fringe, respectively. (6) If any nonconforming use or structure experiences a repetitive loss, as defined in Section 36-293 of this ordinance, it must not be reconstructed except in conformity with the provisions of this ordinance. (7) Any substantial improvement, as defined in Section 36-293 of this ordinance, to a nonconforming structure requires that the existing structure and any additions must meet the requirements of Section 36-295 or Section 36-296 of this ordinance for new structures, depending upon whether the structure is in the Floodway or Flood Fringe District. Sec. 36-303 Penalties and enforcement. (a) Violation Constitutes a Misdemeanor. Violation of the provisions of this ordinance or failure to comply with any of its requirements (including violations of conditions and safeguards established in connection with grants of variances or conditional uses) constitute a misdemeanor and will be punishable as defined by law. (b) Nothing herein contained shall prevent the city from taking such other lawful action as is necessary to prevent or remedy any violation. Such actions may include but are not limited to: (1) In responding to a suspected Ordinance violation, the Zoning Administrator and Local Government may utilize the full array of enforcement actions available to it including but not limited to prosecution and fines, injunctions, after-the-fact permits, orders for corrective measures or a request to the National Flood Insurance Program for denial of flood insurance availability to the guilty party. The Community must act in good faith to enforce these official controls and to correct Ordinance violations to the extent possible so as not to jeopardize its eligibility in the National Flood Insurance Program. (2) When an Ordinance violation is either discovered by or brought to the attention of the Zoning Administrator, the Zoning Administrator shall immediately investigate the situation and document the nature and extent of the violation of the official control. As soon as is reasonably possible, this information will be submitted to the appropriate Department of Natural Resources' and Federal Emergency Management Agency Regional Office along with the Community's plan of action to correct the violation to the degree possible. (3) The Zoning Administrator shall notify the suspected party of the requirements of this Ordinance and all other official controls and the nature and extent of the suspected violation of these controls. If the structure and/or use is under construction or development, the Zoning Administrator may order the construction or development immediately halted until City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Title: Floodplain District Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments Page 20 a proper permit or approval is granted by the Community. If the construction or development is already completed, then the Zoning Administrator may either: (1) issue an order identifying the corrective actions that must be made within a specified time period to bring the use or structure into compliance with the official controls; or (2) notify the responsible party to apply for an after-the-fact permit/development approval within a specified period of time not to exceed 30-days. (4) If the responsible party does not appropriately respond to the Zoning Administrator within the specified period of time, each additional day that lapses shall constitute an additional violation of this Ordinance and shall be prosecuted accordingly. The Zoning Administrator shall also upon the lapse of the specified response period notify the landowner to restore the land to the condition which existed prior to the violation of this Ordinance. Sec. 36-304 Amendments. (a) Floodplain Designation – Restrictions on Removal. The floodplain designation on the Official Zoning Map must not be removed from floodplain areas unless it can be shown that the designation is in error or that the area has been filled to or above the elevation of the regulatory flood protection elevation and is contiguous to lands outside the floodplain. Special exceptions to this rule may be permitted by the Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) if the Commissioner determines that, through other measures, lands are adequately protected for the intended use. (b) Amendments Require DNR Approval. All amendments to this ordinance must be submitted to and approved by the Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) prior to adoption. The Commissioner must approve the amendment prior to community approval. (c) Map Revisions Require Ordinance Amendments. The floodplain district regulations must be amended to incorporate any revisions by the Federal Emergency Management Agency to the floodplain maps adopted in Section 36-292(c) of this ordinance. SECTION 3. The contents of Planning Case File 16-34-ZA are hereby entered into and made part of the public hearing record and the record of decision for this case. SECTION 4. The ordinance shall take effect on November 4, 2016, and not less than 15 days after its publication. Public Hearing August 16, 2016 First Reading September 6, 2016 Second Reading September 19, 2016 Date of Publication September 29, 2016 Effective Date November 4, 2016 Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council September 19, 2016 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Title: Floodplain District Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments Page 21 Attest: Approved as to Form and Execution: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Soren Mattick, City Attorney Stamp with Community Seal: City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Title: Floodplain District Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments Page 22 Westwood HillsNature Center Cedar Manor School Minneapolis Golf Club Knollwood Mall Benilde-St.MargaretSchool Bass LakePreserve Wolfe Park MeadowbrookGolf Course Louisiana Oaks Park Aquila Park St. Louis ParkSenior High School St. Louis ParkMiddle School MethodistHospital JewishCommunity Center ShelardPark City Hall Dakota Park Peter HobartSchool KeystonePark Hannon Lake Victoria Lake Cobble CrestLake Westwood Lake LamplighterPond MeadowbrookLake South OakPond Twin Lake City of MinnetonkaCity of Plymouth City of Golden Valley City of Hopkins City of Edina City of MinneapolisTDM Zone ATDM Zone B Recreation Center Fire Station#2 Oak HillPark MunicipalService Center Park NicolletClinic Fire Station#1 PoliceStation MinnehahaCreek MINNETONKA BLVD EXCELSIOR BLVDCEDAR LAKE RD34TH ST W WALKER ST LAKE ST W 27TH ST W ALABAMA AVE STEXAS AVE SFRANCE AVE SOXFORD STFLAG AVE SFLORIDA AVE SYOSEMITE AVE SGEORGIA AVE SIDAHO AVE SLIB R A R Y L N 41ST ST WJERSEY AVE SW O O D D A L E A V E SLOUISIANA AVE S38TH ST W 37TH ST W FORD RD KENTUCKY AVE SSHELARD PKWY CEDARLAKERDS35TH ST W VERNON AVE SGORHAM A V E PARK GLEN R D INGLEWOOD AVE SKIPLING AVE SBELT LINE BLVDBROWNDALEAVE39TH ST W CLUB RD MORNINGSIDE RDBRUNSWICK AVE SJOPPA AVE SHUNTINGTON AVE SVIRGINIA CIR N PARK PLACE BLVD S28TH ST WMELROSEAVE 25 1/2 ST W NORTH STZARTHAN AVE SBROOKSID E AVEMARYLAND AVE S31ST ST W 16TH ST W FORESTRD HAMILTON ST ZINRAN AVE SEDGEBROOK D R TOLEDO AVE SGOODRICH AVE B A S SWOOD RDUTICA AVE S1ST ST NW23RD ST W 361/2 ST W 36TH ST WELIOT VIEW RD 26TH ST W GLENHURST AVE S2ND ST NWXENWOOD AVE SWEBSTER AVE SAQUILALNS32ND ST W NEVADA AVE SM O N T E R E Y D R VIRGINIA CIR S NATCHEZ AVE SFRANKLIN AVE W 24TH ST WWESTWOODHILL S D R MEADOWBROOK RDVALLACHE R A VE DAKOTA AVE SSALEM AVE S22ND ST W LYNN AVE S43 1/2 ST W 40TH LN W 29TH ST W 40TH ST W OTTAWA AVE S25TH ST W BOONE AVE SW O O D D A L E A V E GAMBLE DR 30 1/2 ST W BR O W N L O W A V E BROOK AVE S34 1/2 ST W Q U E B E C A V E S14TH ST W BURDPL S TANLEN R D RALEIGH AVE SPARKLANDSRDMACKEY AVE SXYLONAVESSERVICERDP A R K C O M M O NS D RKILMER AVEVICTORIA W A Y SOUTH ST CEDARWOOD R DJORDAN AVE SP ARKER R D SUMTER AVE SCOLORADO AVE SDART AVE SUTAH AVE SAQUILAAVESCA V EL L A V ESKENTUCKYLN 22ND LN W 35 1/2 ST WRIDGE DRM O N I T O R S T BLACKSTONE AVE SVERMONT ST FORD LN RANDALL A V E 32 1/2 ST W EDGEWOOD AVE SWYOMING AVE ST A F T A V E S STEPHENS DRINDEPENDENCEAVES REPU BLIC A VEDECATURLN MONTEREY AVE SHAMPSHIRE AVE S13TH LN W CAVEL LLN PAR K C E N T E RBLVD13 1/2 ST W PRINCETON AVE SPARKDALE DR OREGON AVE SPHILLIPS PKWYLANCASTERAVEGLENHURST R DVIRGINIAAV E S SBHWY100STOWBHWY7YUKON AVE S33RD ST W MEADOWBRO O K BLV D HIGHWOODRD GLEN PLSUMTERDRHILLSBOROAVES24TH CT W EXCELSIOR WAYV IC T O RIAC R V WOOD L A N D D R QUEBECDR DECATUR AVE SBROOKLNMINNEHAHA C IRSBROOKV I EW DR CEDAR S T O AK LEAFDR FO R E S T L N 42 1/2 ST WHILLLNSFRONTAGE RDWOOD LN LOUISIANA CT SFAIRWAY LNOAKPARK V I L L A G E D R T E X A T O N KAAVEJEWISHCCTU R N A R O U N D ENSIGN AVE SV IC TORIA C I R WILLOW LN SBOONE CTAUTO CLUB WAY DEVANEY ST FREDERI C K A V E AQUILA CIR S OTTAWA PLWESTRIDGE LN24TH PL W SUNSET RIDGE RDFORD CIR TEXAS CIR S ID AHO A VES 23RD ST W 34TH ST W 28TH ST WPENNSYLVANIAAVES DAKOTA AVE S29TH ST WBLACKSTONE AVE S32ND ST W AQUILAAVES MARYLAND AVE S18TH ST W 23RD ST W GETTYSBURG AVE SLAKE ST W36TH ST W 31ST ST W 2 3 R D STWQUEBEC AVE S31ST ST WUTAH AVE S34TH ST W COLORADO AVE SXENWOOD AVE S33RD ST WOREGON AVE SJOPPA AVE SJERSEY AVE S25TH ST W 18TH ST W R A L E IG H A V E S 31ST ST W HIGHWAY 100 S33RD ST W WEBSTER AVE SCEDARLAKERDS R H O D E I SLANDAVESPENNSYLVANIA AVE SKIPLING AVE SSUMTER AVE SDAKOTA AVE SYOSEMITE AVE SEDGEWOOD AVE SSUMTER AVE SUTICA AVE SPRI NCETONAVESNATCHEZ AVE S13TH LN W 31ST ST W ZARTHAN AVE S32ND ST W PENNSYLVANIA AVE SYOSEMITE AVE SKENTUCKY AVE S16TH ST W 22ND ST WFORD RDOXFORD ST 23RD ST W VIRGINIAAVESDAKOTA AVE S25 1/2 ST W INGLEWOOD AVE S43 1/2 ST W 26TH ST W 31ST ST WZARTHAN AVE S27TH ST W VIRGINIAAVESSALEM AVE SYOSEMITE AVE S33RD ST W 41ST ST WJORDANAVES TOLEDO AVE SOTTAWA AVE S3 6TH ST W RALEIGH AVE S 25TH ST WOREGON AVE S18TH ST W 37TH ST W FRANCE AVE S28TH ST W XENWOOD AVE SCOLORADO AVE SUTICA AVE SBRUNSWICK AVE SXYLON AVE SEDGEWOOD AVE S37TH ST WNEVADA AVE S18THSTWBLACKSTONE AVE SBOONE AVE SCOLORADOAVES31ST ST W RHODE ISLAND AVE S23RD ST W LYNN AVE SQ U EBECAVESBRUNSWICK AVE S22ND ST W BRUNSWICK AVE S26TH ST W BROOKVIEW DR 40TH ST WDAKOTA AVE STEXAS AVE SKILMERAVE27TH ST W HAMPSHIRE AVE SZARTHAN AVE SHUNTINGTONAVES42ND ST W 22ND ST W 32ND ST W FRANKLIN AVE W 24TH ST W 2 5 T H ST W 29TH ST W RALEIGH AVE S16TH STW RHODE ISLAND AVE S16TH ST W OTTAWA AVE SVIRGINIAAVESQUENTIN AVE S35TH ST W 16 TH S T W UTAH AVE SALABAMA AVE SSUMTER AVE S33RD ST W PENNSYLVANI AAV E SYUKON AVE SBOONE AVE SPENNSYLVANIA AVE SAQUILA AVE SGETTYSBURG AVE S14TH ST W XYLON AVE SCAVELL AVE S35TH ST WCOLORADO AVE S29TH ST W 39TH ST W OTTAWA AVE SXYLON AVE S14TH ST W OTTAWAAVE SFLAG AVE SWEBSTER AVE SNEVADA AVE S37TH ST WUTAH AVE SHAMPSHIRE AVE SEDGEWOOD AVE SLYNN AVE SJOPPA AVE SALABAMA AVE S27TH ST WHAMPSHIRE AVE SVIRGINIA AVE S22NDSTW FLORIDA AVE SCAMBRIDGE ST 36TH ST W CAMBRIDGE ST RALEIGH AVE SXENWOOD AVE SRHODE I S L A N D A V E S 26TH ST W DAKOTA AVE SIDAHO AVE SQUEBEC AVE SINGLEWOOD AVE SSA L EM A V E S MEADOWBR O OKBLV DVIRGINIAAVES32ND ST W NATCHEZ AVE SQUEBEC AVE S28TH ST W WYOMINGAVESZARTHAN AVE S39TH ST W VERNON AVE SPRINCETON AVE SPRINCETON AVE SBRUNSWICK AVE SWALKER ST41ST ST WYOSEMITE AVE S26TH ST W UTICAAVESMONTEREY AVE SALABAMA AVE SFRANKLIN AVE W AQU IL A A V E S28TH ST W 29TH ST W 16TH ST W WEBSTER AVE SUTAH AVE SVIRGINIA AVE S?úA@ ?úA@ ?úA@ %&e( GbWX GbWX GbWX GzWX ?«A@ ?«A@ )y )y )y GdWXGdWX Proposed Zoning Map ±Updated: August 4, 2016 Prepared by the City of St. Louis Park Community Development Department Zoning Districts Representation: Zoning_Rep POS Park and Open Space R-1 Single-Family Residence R-2 Single-Family Residence R-3 Two-Family Residence R-4 Multiple-Family Residence R-C High-Density Multiple-Family Residence M-X Mixed Use C-1 Neighborhood Commercial C-2 General Commercial BP Business Park O Office I-P Industrial Park I-G General Industrial PUD Planned Unit Development Floodway Flood Fringe General Floodplain Travel Demand Management Boundary 0 0.55 1.10.275 Miles City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Title: Floodplain District Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments Page 23 Legend Floodplain District Boundary Changes No Change Added to 100-year Floodplain Removed from 100-year Floodplain Parcels City Boundary Zoning Map Floodplain District Boundary Changes ¯ HWY 7 HWY 7 HWY 7 HWY 100HWY 100HWY 169EXCELSIO R B L V DLOUIS IANA AVE Area of Interest 0 0.5 1 Miles City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Title: Floodplain District Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments Page 24 D R A F T UNOFFICIAL MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA AUGUST 17, 2016 – 6:00 p.m. COUNCIL CHAMBERS MEMBERS PRESENT: Lynne Carper, Claudia Johnston-Madison, Torrey Kanne, Lisa Peilen, Richard Person, Joe Tatalovich, Ethan Rickert (youth member) MEMBERS ABSENT: Carl Robertson STAFF PRESENT: Sean Walther, Phillip Elkin 1. Call to Order – Roll Call 2. Approval of Minutes of August 3, 2016 Commissioner Carper asked that corrections be made to the minutes as follows: 2A. Approval of July 20, 2016 minutes should indicate that Commissioner Robertson seconded the motion of approval; 3B. Arlington Row Apts. West public hearing should indicate that Commissioner Kanne seconded the motion recommending approval. Commissioner Carper made a motion to approve the minutes of August 3, 2016 as amended. Commissioner Person seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 3-0-3 (Johnston-Madison, Peilen and Tatalovich abstained). 3. Hearings A. Floodplain District Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments Applicant: City of St. Louis Park Case No.: 16-34-ZA Sean Walther, Planning and Zoning Supervisor, presented the staff report. He explained that the amendments pertain to Floodplain Districts in order to remain in compliance with Federal and State regulations and to maintain the City’s eligibility to participate in the National Flood Insurance Program. He explained further that the city needs to update its floodplain ordinance and floodplain district boundaries to adhere to new federal and state requirements no later than November 4, 2016. Mr. Walther stated that 215 property owners whose land intersects changes to the floodplain district boundary were notified of the public hearing. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Title: Floodplain District Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments Page 25 Unofficial Minutes Planning Commission August 17, 2016 Page 2 Mr. Walther presented and discussed the floodplain district boundary changes map. He noted that three hand-outs with FAQs, detailed maps and topography data are provided for residents in attendance. He said questions about individual properties can be answered after the Planning Commission meeting adjourns. Commissioner Peilen asked how frequently the map is revised by the federal government. Mr. Walther said he believed the last map revision occurred in 2004. Mr. Walther spoke about online tools which the city proposes to provide to property owners with resources for more information regarding Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps. Chair Johnston-Madison opened the public hearing. Sandra Ewing, 3148 Hillsboro Ave S., spoke about flooding at her property two years ago. At that time fire staff said they didn’t need to sandbag because of the structure elevation. She asked if FEMA bases flood zones on topographic data. She commented that some neighboring properties flooded, some did not. She spoke about having to hire a surveyor in 1996. Mr. Walther responded that the 100-year flood plain does have an elevation associated with it. It varies throughout the Minnehaha Creek area in St. Louis Park. He spoke about the letter of amendment process as well as proposed mapping tools to assist residents. He noted that FEMA maps are not perfect but they are an assessment of risk. He said topographical data and rainfall data is much improved since the last map revision in 2004. Katherine Heyerdahl, 3171 Hillsboro Ave. S., said she has done a lot of research on her own. She said she has not been able to file a request for map amendment as there has been a hold on all changes during the last three years. She said the FEMA website has the ability for property owners to attach digital documents to support an amendment request rather than having to hire a surveyor. She commented that Anoka now has high quality website maps which can be submitted to FEMA. Mr. Walther responded that Anoka County is about one year ahead of the city in this process. St. Louis Park hopes to replicate the tools that Anoka County now has. He said the city’s goal is to be able to provide resources to residents around Labor Day. As no one else was present wishing to speak, the Chair closed the public hearing. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Title: Floodplain District Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments Page 26 Unofficial Minutes Planning Commission August 17, 2016 Page 3 Commissioner Peilen made a motion recommending approval of the Zoning Ordinance Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment pertaining to Floodplain Districts. Commissioner Carper seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 6- 0. 4. Other Business: None 5. Communications: None 6. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 6:40 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Nancy Sells Recording Secretary City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Title: Floodplain District Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments Page 27 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED IN REPLY REFER TO: 19P-A May 4, 2016 The Honorable Jake Spano Mayor, City of St. Louis Park City Hall 5005 Minnetonka Boulevard St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 Community: City of St. Louis Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota Community No.: 270184 Map Panels Affected: See FIRM Index Dear Mayor Spano: This is to formally notify you of the final flood hazard determination for the City of St. Louis Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota, in compliance with Title 44, Chapter I, Part 67, Section 67.11, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). This section requires that notice of final flood hazards shall be sent to the Chief Executive Officer of the community, all individual appellants, and the State Coordinating Agency, and shall be published in the Federal Register. On September 2, 2004, the Department of Homeland Security’s Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) issued a Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) that identified the Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHAs), the areas that would be inundated by the flood having a 1-percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year (base flood), in your community. Recently, FEMA completed a re-evaluation of flood hazards in your community. On December 31, 2005, and August 17, 2012, FEMA provided you with Preliminary copies of the Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report and FIRM that identify existing flood hazards in your community, including Base Flood Elevations (BFEs). The proposed flood hazard determinations (FHDs) for your community were published in the Star Tribune on March 29, 2013, and April 5, 2013, and in the Federal Register, at Part 67, Volume 78, Page 8180, on February 5, 2013. The statutory 90-day appeal period, which was initiated on the second newspaper publication date cited above, has ended. The proposed FHDs for your community were appealed during that time. All technical data submitted in support of the appeal have been evaluated, and the appeal has been resolved. Therefore, the FHDs for your community are considered final. The final notice for FHDs will be published in the Federal Register as soon as possible. The FIRM for your community will become effective on November 4, 2016. Before the effective date, FEMA will send you final printed copies of the FIS report and FIRM. Because the FIS establishing the FHDs for your community has been completed, certain additional requirements must be met under Section 1361 of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, as amended, within 6 months from the date of this letter. Prior to November 4, 2016, your community is required, as a condition of continued eligibility in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), to adopt or show evidence of adoption of floodplain management regulations that meet the standards of Paragraph 60.3(d) of the enclosed NFIP regulations (44 CFR 59, etc.) by the effective date of the FIRM. These standards are the minimum requirements and do not supersede any State or local requirements of a more stringent nature. It must be emphasized that all the standards specified in Paragraph 60.3(d) of the NFIP regulations must be enacted in a legally enforceable document. This includes adoption of the current effective FIS and FIRM City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Title: Floodplain District Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments Page 28 2 to which the regulations apply and other modifications made by this map revision. Some of the standards should already have been enacted by your community in order to establish initial eligibility in the NFIP. Your community can meet any additional requirements by taking one of the following actions: • Amending existing regulations to incorporate any additional requirements of Paragraph 60.3(d); • Adopting all the standards of Paragraph 60.3(d) into one new, comprehensive set of regulations; or • Showing evidence that regulations have previously been adopted that meet or exceed the minimum requirements of Paragraph 60.3(d). Communities that fail to enact the necessary floodplain management regulations will be suspended from participation in the NFIP and subject to the prohibitions contained in Section 202(a) of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (Public Law 93-234) as amended. In addition to your community using the FIS to manage development in the floodplain, FEMA will use the FIS to establish appropriate flood insurance rates. On the effective date of the revised FIRM, actuarial rates for flood insurance will be charged for all new structures and substantial improvements to existing structures located in the identified Special Flood Hazard Areas, the areas subject to inundation by the base flood. These rates may be higher if structures are not built in compliance with the floodplain management standards of the NFIP. The actuarial flood insurance rates increase as the lowest elevations (including basement) of new structures decrease in relation to the BFEs established for your community. This is an important consideration for new construction because building at a higher elevation can greatly reduce the cost of flood insurance. To assist your community in maintaining the FIRM, we have enclosed a Summary of Map Actions to document previous Letter of Map Change (LOMC) actions (i.e., Letters of Map Amendment, Letters of Map Revision) that will be superseded when the revised FIRM panels referenced above become effective. Information on LOMCs is presented in the following four categories: (1) LOMCs for which results have been included on the revised FIRM panels; (2) LOMCs for which results could not be shown on the revised FIRM panels because of scale limitations or because the LOMC issued had determined that the lots or structures involved were outside the SFHA as shown on the FIRM; (3) LOMCs for which results have not been included on the revised FIRM panels because the flood hazard information on which the original determinations were based are being superseded by new flood hazard information; and (4) LOMCs issued for multiple lots or structures where the determination for one or more of the lots or structures cannot be revalidated through an administrative process like the LOMCs in Category 2 above. LOMCs in Category 2 will be revalidated through a single letter that reaffirms the validity of a previously issued LOMC; the letter will be sent to your community shortly before the effective date of the revised FIRM and will become effective 1 day after the revised FIRM becomes effective. For the LOMCs listed in Category 4, we will review the data previously submitted for the LOMA or LOMR request and issue a new determination for the affected properties after the revised FIRM becomes effective. The FIRM and FIS report for your community have been prepared in our countywide format, which means that flood hazard information for all jurisdictions within Hennepin County has been combined into one FIRM and FIS report. When the FIRM and FIS report are printed and distributed, your community will receive only those panels that present flood hazard information for your community. We will provide complete sets of the FIRM panels to county officials, where they will be available for review by your community. The FIRM panels have been computer-generated. Once the FIRM and FIS report are printed and City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Title: Floodplain District Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments Page 29 3 distributed, the digital files containing the flood hazard data for the entire county can be provided to your community for use in a computer mapping system. These files can be used in conjunction with other thematic data for floodplain management purposes, insurance purchase and rating requirements, and many other planning applications. Copies of the digital files or paper copies of the FIRM panels may be obtained by calling our FEMA Map Information eXchange (FMIX), toll free, at 1-877-FEMA-MAP (1- 877-336-2627). In addition, your community may be eligible for additional credits under our Community Rating System if you implement your activities using digital mapping files. If your community is encountering difficulties in enacting the necessary floodplain management measures required to continue participation in the NFIP, we urge you to call the Director, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Division of FEMA in Chicago, Illinois, at (312) 408-5500 for assistance. If you have any questions concerning mapping issues in general or the enclosed Summary of Map Actions, please call our FEMA Map Information eXchange (FMIX), toll free, at 1-877-FEMA-MAP (1-877-336-2627). Additional information and resources your community may find helpful regarding the NFIP and floodplain management, such as The National Flood Insurance Program Code of Federal Regulations, Answers to Questions About the National Flood Insurance Program, Frequently Asked Questions Regarding the Effects that Revised Flood Hazards have on Existing Structure, Use of Flood Insurance Study (FIS) Data as Available Data, and National Flood Insurance Program Elevation Certificate and Instructions, can be found on our website at http://www.floodmaps.fema.gov/lfd. Paper copies of these documents may also be obtained by calling our FMIX. Sincerely, Luis Rodriguez, P.E., Chief Engineering Management Branch Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration Enclosure: Final Summary of Map Actions cc: Community Map Repository Kevin Locke, Community Development Director, City of St. Louis Park City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Title: Floodplain District Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments Page 30 FINAL SUMMARY OF MAP ACTIONS Community: SOMA-2 Community No: 270184 ST. LOUIS PARK, CITY OF To assist your community in maintaining the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), we have summarized below the previously issued Letter of Map Change (LOMC) actions (i.e., Letters of Map Revision (LOMRs) and Letters of Map Amendment (LOMAs)) that will be affected when the revised FIRM becomes effective on November 4, 2016. 1. LOMCs Incorporated The modifications effected by the LOMCs listed below will be reflected on the revised FIRM. In addition, these LOMCs will remain in effect until the revised FIRM becomes effective. New Panel Old Panel Project Identifier Date Issued Case No. LOMC LOMR 14-05-2615P 2013 Edina Morningside LOMR 27053C0362E 27053C0362F 12/29/2014 2. LOMCs Not Incorporated The modifications effected by the LOMCs listed below will not be reflected on the revised FIRM panels because of scale limitations or because the LOMC issued had determined that the lot(s) or structure(s) involved were outside the Special Flood Hazard Area, as shown on the FIRM. These LOMCs will remain in effect until the revised FIRM becomes effective. These LOMCs will be revalidated free of charge 1 day after the revised FIRM becomes effective through a single revalidation letter that reaffirms the validity of the previous LOMCs. LOMC Case No. Date Issued Project Identifier Old Panel New Panel LOMA 199100591FIA 27053C0361E 2630 ALABAMA AVE SO. 27053C0334F 06/24/1983 LOMA 92-05-081B Apt. Ownership No. 20 2701840005B 27053C0353F 03/17/1992 LOMA 93-05-400A PARK POINTE APARTMENTS 2701840005B 27053C0353F 03/11/1993 LOMA 93-05-850A BROOKSIDE SECOND DIVISION 2701840005B 27053C0361F 10/21/1993 LOMR-F 93-05-846A WESTWOOD HOMES 2701840005B 27053C0353F 12/10/1993 LOMR-F 94-05-198A LOT 2-39, BLOCK 1 - WESTWOOD TOWNHOUSES 2701840005B 27053C0354F 12/29/1993 LOMA 199400151R05 Unknown 27053C0361F 2701840005B 05/06/1994 LOMA 199400227R05 Unknown 2701840005B 27053C0361F 07/05/1994 Page 1 of 8 4/21/2016 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Title: Floodplain District Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments Page 31 FINAL SUMMARY OF MAP ACTIONS Community: SOMA-2 Community No: 270184 ST. LOUIS PARK, CITY OF LOMC Case No. Date Issued Project Identifier Old Panel New Panel LOMA 95-05-850A 3151 HILLSBORO AVENUE, SOUTH 2701840005B 27053C0334F 07/05/1995 LOMA 95-05-2002A 2827 AGUILA AVENUE SOUTH 2701840005B 27053C0334F 08/25/1995 LOMR-F 95-05-2668A LOTS 1-101, BLOCK 1 - SUNGATE ADDITION 2701840005B 27053C0353F 02/05/1996 LOMA 96-05-3414A LOTS 2 & 3, BLOCK 1 - WEST LYNN 2ND ADDITION 2701840005B 27053C0334F 12/02/1996 LOMA 97-05-3944A MINNEHANA GABLES - LOT 12, BLOCK 1, 2ND ADDITION - 3231 FLAG AVENUE 2701840005B 27053C0334F 11/10/1997 LOMA 97-05-5320A 4740 W. 27TH STREET 2701840005B 27053C0354F 12/03/1997 LOMA 98-05-3068A BROOKSIDE SECOND DIVISION - LOT 2, BLOCK 3 - 6224 MEADOWBROOK BOULEVARD 2701840005B 27053C0361F 06/03/1998 LOMA 98-05-5486A MINNEHAHA GABLES, 2ND ADDITION - LOT 15, BLOCK 1 - 3301 FLAG AVENUE SOUTH 2701840005B 27053C0334F 09/25/1998 LOMR-F 98-05-4868A OTTERLEI ADDITION, LOT 2, BLOCK 1 - 6900 OXFORD STREET 2701840005B 27053C0361F 12/16/1998 LOMA 99-05-2420A CEDARWOOD SECOND ADDITION, BLOCK 6, LOTS 1 & 2 - 2524 MONTEREY AVENUE SOUTH 2701840005B 27053C0354F 05/05/1999 LOMA 99-05-3846A BROOKSIDE ADD 2, BLOCK 2 - LOT 8 - 4265 MEADOWBROOK BLVD 2701840005B 27053C0361F 05/12/1999 LOMA 00-05-5862A BROOKSIDE, LOT 4, BLOCK 4 - 5642 WOOD LANE/4341 YOSEMITE AVE. S 2701840005B 27053C0361F 09/21/2000 LOMA 00-05-5394A 2170 CEDAR LAKE ROAD 2701840005B 27053C0353F 11/28/2000 LOMA 01-05-0730A 3224 GETTYSBURG AVE., S. (LOT 7, BL. 1, MINNEHAHA GABLES, 2ND ADDITION) 2701840005B 27053C0334F 02/21/2001 LOMA 01-05-586A BLOCK 6, LOT 4, CEDARWOOD 2ND ADDITION; 2510 MONTEREY AVENUE SOUTH 2701840005B 27053C0354F 04/13/2001 LOMA 02-05-0432A LOT 7, BLOCK 2, BROOKSIDE SECOND DIVISION--4255 MEADOWBROOK BLVD. 2701840005B 27053C0361F 11/30/2001 LOMA 02-05-2920A 3295 HILLSBORO AVENUE SOUTH 2701840005B 27053C0334F 08/28/2002 LOMA 02-05-3911A LOTS 5 AND 6, WEST LYNNSUBDIVISION--8630 WEST 29TH STREET 2701840005B 27053C0334F 12/11/2002 Page 2 of 8 4/21/2016 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Title: Floodplain District Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments Page 32 FINAL SUMMARY OF MAP ACTIONS Community: SOMA-2 Community No: 270184 ST. LOUIS PARK, CITY OF LOMC Case No. Date Issued Project Identifier Old Panel New Panel LOMA 03-05-4140A LOTS 18 & 19, BLOCK 2, JOHN A. JOHNSON'S ADDITION--6301 WAYZATA BLVD. 2701840005B 27053C0351F 09/18/2003 LOMA 03-05-4680A 7448 WEST 16TH STREET 2701840005B 27053C0353F 09/25/2003 LOMA 03-05-4634A LOT 1, BLOCK 1, ASPENWOOD--2357 PARKWOODS ROAD 2701840005B 27053C0354F 10/14/2003 LOMA 03-05-2644A LOTS 8, 9, 17 & 18, BLOCK 3, BARRETT'S ADDN. TO MINNEAPOLIS--2745 NATCHEZ AVE. S 2701840005B 27053C0354F 11/17/2003 LOMA 04-05-4054A LOT 2, BLOCK 1, LAMPLIGHTER PARK TOWNHOMES--7607 WEST 14TH STREET 27053C0334E 27053C0334F 11/24/2004 LOMA 05-05-0585A WEST LYNN SUBDIV, LOT 3 -- 8600 WEST 29TH STREET 27053C0334E 27053C0334F 12/06/2004 LOMR-F 05-05-0695A WOLFE LAKE PROFESSIONAL CENTER, BLOCK 1, LOT 1 -- 5000 & 5040 WEST 36TH STREET 27053C0354E 27053C0354F 12/16/2004 LOMR-F 05-05-0760A VERNON OAKS, BLOCK 1, LOT 2 -- 2559 VERNON AVENUE 27053C0353E 27053C0353F 02/01/2005 LOMA 05-05-0617A TRACTS A AND B, REGISTERED SURVEY NO. 217--3430 SUNSET RIDGE ROAD 27053C0334E 27053C0334F 02/02/2005 LOMA 05-05-1523A ISENSEE'S ADDITION, BLOCK 1, LOT 3 -- 3310 HILLSBORO AVENUE SOUTH 27053C0334E 27053C0334F 03/16/2005 LOMA 05-05-1285A MINIKAHDA OAKS, BLOCK 2, LOT 11 -- 3336 HUNTINGTON AVENUE SOUTH 27053C0354E 27053C0354F 03/16/2005 LOMA 05-05-1276A ARETZ 4TH ADDITION, BLOCK 2, LOT 12 -- 2466 GETTYSBURG AVENUE SOUTH 27053C0334E 27053C0334F 03/21/2005 LOMA 05-05-1235A ARETZ 4TH ADDITION, BLOCK 2, LOT 10 -- 2454 GETTYSBURG AVENUE SOUTH 27053C0334E 27053C0334F 05/12/2005 LOMA 05-05-3405A PRINCETON COURT TOWNHOMES 27053C0354E 27053C0354F 06/29/2005 LOMA 05-05-3630A MINIKAHDA OAKS SUBDIV, BLOCK 1, LOTS 3 & 4 -- 4121 RANDALL AVENUE SOUTH 27053C0354E 27053C0354F 07/19/2005 LOMA 05-05-3981A MINNEHAHA GABLES ANNEX, BLOCK 1, LOT 13 -- 3307 DECATUR LANE 27053C0334E 27053C0334F 08/11/2005 LOMR-F 05-05-2838A SUNGATE ADDITION, BLOCK 1, LOTS 1-100 27053C0353E 27053C0353F 08/18/2005 LOMA 05-05-4255A HILLSBORO OAKS SUBDIV, BLOCK 1, LOT 2 -- 3148 HILLSBORO AVENUE SOUTH 27053C0334E 27053C0334F 10/11/2005 Page 3 of 8 4/21/2016 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Title: Floodplain District Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments Page 33 FINAL SUMMARY OF MAP ACTIONS Community: SOMA-2 Community No: 270184 ST. LOUIS PARK, CITY OF LOMC Case No. Date Issued Project Identifier Old Panel New Panel LOMA 06-05-0103A PURE'S KNOLLWOOD ADDITION, BLOCK 1 , LOT 1 -- 8510 & 8530 STATE HIGHWAY NO. 7 27053C0342E 27053C0342F 11/22/2005 LOMA 06-05-0844A BROOKSIDE 2ND DIVISION, BLOCK 3, LOT 1 -- 6200 MEADOWBROOK BLVD 27053C0361E 27053C0361F 01/24/2006 LOMR-F 05-05-3593A HOMES OF VERNON OAKS SUBDIV 27053C0353E 27053C0353F 01/31/2006 LOMA 06-05-0995A CEDARWOOD 2ND ADDITION, BLOCK 1, LOT 12 -- 4320 WEST 25TH STREET 27053C0354E 27053C0354F 04/04/2006 LOMA 06-05-B743A Sungate ONe, BLOCK 1, LOT 1 -- 2559 ALABAMA AVENUE SOUTH (MN) 27053C0353E 27053C0353F 04/04/2006 LOMA 06-05-BC46A WEST LYNN 2ND ADDITION, BLOCK 1, LOT 4 -- 2801 AQUILA AVENUE SOUTH (MN) 27053C0334E 27053C0334F 04/18/2006 LOMA 06-05-BN92A OTTERLEI ADDITION, BLOCK 1, LOT 1 -- 6980 OXFORD STREET (MN) 27053C0361E 27053C0361F 08/02/2006 LOMA 07-05-1295A EATON'S 2ND & 3RD ADDITIONS, BLOCK 1, VARIOUS LOTS -- 25 1/2 STREET WEST 27053C0353E 27053C0353F 02/06/2007 LOMA 07-05-2635A WEST LYNN SECOND ADDITION, BLOCK 1, LOT 2 -- 2745 AQUILA AVENUE SOUTH (MN) 27053C0334E 27053C0334F 03/06/2007 LOMA 07-05-4048A KNOLLWOOD COUNTRY CLUB, BLOCK 1, LOT 10 -- 8906 MINNEHAHA CIRCLE NORTH (MN) 27053C0334E 27053C0334F 05/29/2007 LOMA 07-05-4109A MINIKAHDA OAKS, BLOCK 2, LOT 7 -- 3320 HUNTINGTON AVENUE SOUTH (MN) 27053C0354E 27053C0354F 05/29/2007 LOMA 07-05-3921A KNOLLWOOD COUNTRY CLUB, BLOCK 1, LOT 11 -- 8900 MINNEHAHA CIRCLE NORTH (MN) 27053C0334E 27053C0334F 07/17/2007 LOMA 07-05-5725A WEST LYNN, LOT 2 -- 8530 WEST 29TH STREET 27053C0334E 27053C0334F 09/11/2007 LOMA 08-05-0037A WESTWOOD VILLA CONDOMINIUMS -- 2200 NEVADA AVENUE SOUTH 27053C0353E 27053C0353F 10/23/2007 LOMA 07-05-6216A KNOLLWOOD COUNTRY CLUB, BLOCK 1, LOT 12 -- 8901 SOUTH MINNEHAHA CIRCLE 27053C0334E 27053C0334F 11/01/2007 LOMA 08-05-2987A CEDARWOOD SECOND ADDITION, BLOCK 1, LOT 14 -- 4400 WEST 25TH STREET 27053C0354E 27053C0354F 08/21/2008 LOMA 08-05-4801A MINNEHAHA GABLES 2ND ADDITION, BLOCK 1, LOT 13 -- 3235 FLAG AVENUE SOUTH 27053C0334E 27053C0334F 09/04/2008 LOMA 08-05-4594A Lot 11, Block 1, Cedarwood 2nd Addition Subdivision - 4310 West 25th Street 27053C0354E 27053C0354F 09/12/2008 Page 4 of 8 4/21/2016 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Title: Floodplain District Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments Page 34 FINAL SUMMARY OF MAP ACTIONS Community: SOMA-2 Community No: 270184 ST. LOUIS PARK, CITY OF LOMC Case No. Date Issued Project Identifier Old Panel New Panel LOMA 09-05-0051A CEDARWOOD 2ND ADDITION, BLOCK 6, LOT 4 -- 2510 MONTEREY AVENUE SOUTh 27053C0354E 27053C0354F 11/18/2008 LOMA 09-05-0041A LOU PARK ADDITION, BLOCK 1, LOTS 1 & 2 -- 6465 WAYZATA BOULEVARD 27053C0351E 27053C0351F 11/25/2008 LOMA 09-05-0466A COBBLECREST ADDITION, BLOCK 3, LOT 8 -- 8806 MINNETONKA BOULEVARD 27053C0334E 27053C0334F 11/25/2008 LOMR-F 09-05-0866A REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 554, TRACTS A & B -- 7102 & 7104 LAKE STREET WEST 27053C0353E 27053C0353F 02/17/2009 LOMA 09-05-1470A LOTS 3-11, BLOCK 5, MINIKAHDA OAKS & PORTION OF SECTION 6, T28N, R24W 27053C0354E 27053C0354F 02/24/2009 LOMA 09-05-1956A WESTWOOD ESTATES 4TH ADDITION, LOT 3 & PORTION OF LOT 4, BLOCK 1 -- 8323 FRANKLIN AVENUE WEST 27053C0334E 27053C0334F 03/17/2009 LOMA 09-05-2604A CEDARWOOD 2ND ADDITION, BLOCK 6, LOT 6 -- 4441 25TH STREET WEST 27053C0354E 27053C0354F 05/05/2009 LOMA 09-05-2343A 3332 HUNTINGTON AVENUE SOUTH -- LOT 10, BLOCK 2, MINIKAHDA OAKS 27053C0354E 27053C0354F 05/12/2009 LOMA 09-05-2819A PORTION OF SECTION 31, T29, R24 -- 4832 27TH STREET WEST 27053C0354E 27053C0354F 06/02/2009 LOMA 09-05-5867A SUNGATE ONE CONDOMINIUM, UNIT 2567 -- 2567 ALABAMA AVENUE 27053C0353E 27053C0353F 10/23/2009 LOMA 10-05-0898A LOT 3, BLOCK 6, CEDARWOOD 2ND ADDITION -- 2516 MONTEREY AVENUE SOUTH 27053C0354E 27053C0354F 01/07/2010 LOMA 10-05-0995A LOT 8, BLOCK 3, COBBLECREST ADDITION -- 8808 MINNETONKA BOULEVARD 27053C0334E 27053C0334F 01/08/2010 LOMA 10-05-2065A Lot 12, Block 1, Westwood Estates 2nd Addition Subdivision - 8806 Westmoreland Lane 27053C0334E 27053C0334F 01/26/2010 LOMR-F 10-05-1205A LOTS 1-11, SUNSET RIDGE BUSINESS PARK -- CEDAR LAKE ROAD 27053C0353E 27053C0353F 02/09/2010 LOMA 10-05-1847A LOT 4, BLOCK 1, RIDGE ADDITION -- 2460 HIGHWAY 100 SOUTH 27053C0353E 27053C0353F 03/04/2010 LOMA 10-05-2894A LOT 2, BLOCK 1, TEXA-TONKA 3RD ADDITION -- 2845 WYOMING AVENUE SOUTH 27053C0334E 27053C0334F 03/30/2010 LOMA 10-05-4949A LOT 1, BLOCK 1, FARRS SUNSET RIDGE -- 2030 RIDGE DRIVE 27053C0353E 27053C0353F 08/06/2010 LOMA 10-05-5163A LOT 1, BLOCK 1, WESTWOOD ESTATES 4TH ADDITION -- 833 FRANKLIN AVENUE WEST 27053C0334E 27053C0334F 08/20/2010 Page 5 of 8 4/21/2016 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Title: Floodplain District Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments Page 35 FINAL SUMMARY OF MAP ACTIONS Community: SOMA-2 Community No: 270184 ST. LOUIS PARK, CITY OF LOMC Case No. Date Issued Project Identifier Old Panel New Panel LOMA 10-05-4952A LOT 1, BLOCK 1, FARRS SUNSET RIDGE -- 2010 RIDGE DRIVE 27053C0353E 27053C0353F 10/05/2010 LOMA 11-05-6021A Lot 1, Block 1, Mill City Addition Subdivision - 7201 Walker Street 27053C0353E 27053C0353F 06/14/2011 LOMA 11-05-6299A LOT 3, BLOCK 2, MINNEHAHA GABLES ANNEX -- 8911 WEST 34TH STREET 27053C0334E 27053C0334F 07/14/2011 LOMA 11-05-7369A Lot 4, Block 2, Aretz 4th Addition Subdivision - 2410 Gettysburg Avenue South 27053C0334E 27053C0334F 07/19/2011 LOMA 11-05-6922A LOT 1, BLOCK 1, RORBACH'S ADDITION -- 6401 WAYZATA BOULEVARD 27053C0351E 27053C0351F 08/04/2011 LOMA 11-05-8103A Lot 1 & 2, Block 9, Thorpe Bros Cedar Lake Heights Subdivision - 2530 Monterey Avenue 27053C0354E 27053C0354F 08/31/2011 LOMA 12-05-0913A LOT 7, BLOCK 1, ASPENWOOD, 2309 PARKWOODS ROAD 27053C0354E 27053C0354F 11/29/2011 LOMA 12-05-6388A APARTMENT OWNERSHIP NO. 41 GREENSBORO CONDOMINIUMS, APTS. 203-210 -- FRANKLIN AVENUE WEST 27053C0353E 27053C0353F 08/30/2012 LOMA 12-05-9563A ASPENWOOD, BLOCK 1, LOT 2 -- 2349 PARKWOODS ROAD 27053C0354E 27053C0354F 11/01/2012 LOMA 13-05-0379A MONTEREY ADDITION, BLOCK 1, LOT 3 -- 2732 MONTEREY AVENUE SOUTH 27053C0354E 27053C0354F 11/15/2012 LOMA 13-05-2511A A PORTION OF BLOCK 4, BROOKSIDE SECOND DIVISION -- 6312 MEADOWBROOK BOULEVARD 27053C0361E 27053C0361F 02/26/2013 LOMA 13-05-3639A GREENSBORO CONDOMINIUMS -- 7335, 7339, 7343, 7347, 7351, 7403, 7407 & 7411 FRANKLIN AVENUE WEST 27053C0353E 27053C0353F 04/23/2013 LOMA 13-05-6856A LOT 3, BLOCK 1, ASPENWOOD -- 2341 PARKWOODS ROAD 27053C0354E 27053C0354F 07/23/2013 LOMA 13-05-7841A BROOKSIDE SECOND DIVISION, BLOCK 2, LOT 7 -- 4255 MEADOWBROOK BOULEVARD 27053C0361E 27053C0361F 08/30/2013 LOMA 14-05-1896A LOT 6 & A PORTION OF LOT 5, BLOCK 2, MINIKAHDA OAKS -- 3316 HUNTINGTON AVENUE SOUTH 27053C0354E 27053C0354F 12/31/2013 LOMA 14-05-2673A ARETZ 4TH ADDITION, BLOCK 2, LOT 8 -- 2442 GETTYSBURG AVENUE SOUTH 27053C0334E 27053C0334F 01/30/2014 LOMA 14-05-2136A LOT 8, BLOCK 1, ASPENWOOD -- 2301 PARKWOODS ROAD 27053C0354E 27053C0354F 03/13/2014 LOMA 14-05-4470A LOT 5, BLOCK 1, WEST LYNN SECOND ADDITION --- 2811 AQUILA AVENUE SOUTH 27053C0334E 27053C0334F 03/25/2014 Page 6 of 8 4/21/2016 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Title: Floodplain District Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments Page 36 FINAL SUMMARY OF MAP ACTIONS Community: SOMA-2 Community No: 270184 ST. LOUIS PARK, CITY OF LOMC Case No. Date Issued Project Identifier Old Panel New Panel LOMA 14-05-4724A Lot 29, Block 1, Minnehaha Gables Annex Subdivision - 9018 34th Street West 27053C0334E 27053C0334F 04/03/2014 LOMA 14-05-7709A Lot 2, Block 1, Westwood Estates 4th Addition Subdivision - 8329 Franklin Avenue West 27053C0334E 27053C0334F 07/14/2014 LOMA 14-05-7782A PART OF LOTS 4, 5, 7 & 8, BLOCK 2, WEST LYNN 2ND ADDITION -- 8510 29TH STREET WEST 27053C0334E 27053C0334F 07/22/2014 LOMA 14-05-7978A Lot A, Registered Land Survey No. 154 Subdivision - 8610 29th Street West 27053C0334E 27053C0334F 07/23/2014 LOMA 15-05-0623A Lot 5, Block 6, Cedarwood Second Addition Subdivision - 2506 Monterey Avenue South 27053C0354E 27053C0354F 11/03/2014 LOMA 15-05-2636A WEST LYNN SECOND ADDITION, BLOCK 1, LOT 1 -- 2739 AQUILA AVENUE 27053C0334E 27053C0334F 03/10/2015 LOMA 15-05-3433A NOVARTIS ADDITION, BLOCK 1, PORTION OF LOT 1 -- 5320 23RD STREET WEST 27053C0353E 27053C0353F 04/16/2015 LOMA 15-05-3949A MINIKAHDA OAKS, BLOCK 2, LOTS 8 AND 9 -- 3330 HUNTINGTON AVENUE SOUTH 27053C0354E 27053C0354F 06/18/2015 LOMA 15-05-6728A Lot 4 - 5, Block 1, Westwood Estates 4th Addition Subdivision - 8317 Franklin Avenue West 27053C0334E 27053C0334F 08/25/2015 LOMA 15-05-7395A CEDARWOOD SECOND ADDITION, BLOCK 1, LOT 13 -- 4330 WEST 25TH STREET 27053C0354E 27053C0354F 11/16/2015 LOMA 16-05-2864A SECTION 5, T117, R21 -- 6661 WAYZATA BOULEVARD 27053C0351E 27053C0351F 04/01/2016 3. LOMCs Superseded The modifications effected by the LOMCs listed below have not been reflected on the Final revised FIRM panels because they are being superseded by new detailed flood hazard information or the information available was not sufficient to make a determination. The reason each is being superseded is noted below. These LOMCs will no longer be in effect when the revised FIRM becomes effective. LOMC Case No. Date Issued Project Identifier Reason Determination Will be Superseded LOMR 07-05-4704P PARK NICOLLET LOMR (MN) 09/28/2007 4 1. Insufficient information available to make a determination. 2. Lowest Adjacent Grade and Lowest Finished Floor are below the proposed Base Flood Elevation. 3. Lowest Ground Elevation is below the proposed Base Flood Elevation. 4. Revised hydrologic and hydraulic analyses. 5. Revised topographic information. Page 7 of 8 4/21/2016 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Title: Floodplain District Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments Page 37 FINAL SUMMARY OF MAP ACTIONS Community: SOMA-2 Community No: 270184 ST. LOUIS PARK, CITY OF 4. LOMCs To Be Redetermined The LOMCs in Category 2 above will be revalidated through a single revalidation letter that reaffirms the validity of the determination in the previously issued LOMC. For LOMCs issued for multiple lots or structures where the determination for one or more of the lots or structures has changed, the LOMC cannot be revalidated through this administrative process. Therefore, we will review the data previously submitted for the LOMC requests listed below and issue a new determination for the affected properties after the effective date of the revised FIRM. LOMC Case No. Date Issued Old Panel New Panel Project Identifier NO CASES RECORDED Page 8 of 8 4/21/2016 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Title: Floodplain District Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments Page 38 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Title: Floodplain District Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments Page 39 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Title: Floodplain District Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments Page 40 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Title: Floodplain District Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments Page 41 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Title: Floodplain District Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments Page 42 6/04/2013 revision ORDINANCE CERTIFICATION CHECKLIST Please sign and return the checklist and all required documents to the DNR Floodplain Program office when completed. 1. _______________ Date(s) of published hearing notice. _______________ 2. _______________ Date(s) of public hearing. _______________ 3._______________ Date of ordinance adoption. Include 1 certified copy of the adopted ordinance text in its entirety including the signature of the chief elected official and the stamped seal of the community. 4._______________ Date of newspaper publication of adopted ordinance. Include 1 copy of affidavit of publication of the adopted ordinance. Publication of an ordinance summary is acceptable by statute. 5. _______________ Date of official filing of adopted ordinance with County Recorder (______ record book number and ______ page number). If filing of an adopted ordinance with the county auditor is not a standard practice, please indicate “N/A.” 6. _______________ Board of Adjustment/Appeals has been established (yes or no). Note: Cities under charter must also submit a list of any additional requirements for hearings, notices, etc. stated in their charter and not required by statute. Please specify: ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Signature of Clerk/Auditor City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Title: Floodplain District Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments Page 43 Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: September 6, 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Rezoning – Office Building Located at 8001 Highway 7 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to approve First Reading of an Ordinance amending the Zoning Map to rezone the subject property from RC High-Density Multiple-Family to O Office, and set a second reading for September 19, 2016. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Should the zoning map be amended to rezone the property to Office? SUMMARY: 8001 Highway Seven LLC (Applicant), is the owner of the subject property. The property was improved with a multi-tenant office building in 1989. At the time, the property was zoned R-B Residential-Business, and office buildings were a permitted use in that district. The R- B district was eliminated from the zoning ordinance in 1992, and replaced with the RC district which is a high-density multiple-family district. Even though the property was rezoned to RC, the office land use is not legally non-conforming. It is a permitted use because the RC district allows office uses that were in existence in 1999. The issue the property owner is addressing with the rezoning request is that the RC district allows only 80 square feet of signage. If the property were zoned office, then it would receive 200 square feet. The Applicant would like to construct a monument sign along Highway 7 to provide visibility for its tenants. The RC district does not allow sufficient signage for this to be accomplished, but the office district does. The requested sign would be consistent in size with the other commercial properties in the area. Staff finds that the requested zoning map amendment is consistent with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan and the regulations of the zoning ordinance. The applications were presented to the Planning Commission on August 3, 2016. No comments were received at the public hearing. The Planning Commission recommended approval. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion Ordinance Excerpt of Planning Commission Minutes Aerial Photo Prepared by: Gary Morrison, Assistant Zoning Administrator Reviewed by: Sean Walther, Planning & Zoning Supervisor Michele Schnitker, Housing Supervisor/Deputy CD Director Approved by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director Action Agenda Item: 8b City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Page 2 Title: Rezoning – Office Building Located at 8001 Highway 7 DISCUSSION REQUEST: The applicant is the owner of the subject property. He applied to rezone the property to Office for the purpose of increasing the amount of signage the property is allowed. The property is currently zoned R-C High-Density Multiple-Family Residence, and as such is allowed only 80 square feet of sign area. If the property is rezoned to Office, it would be allowed 200 square feet of sign area. LOCATION: The property is located on the frontage road along the south side of Highway 7. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation: Office Zoning District: R-C High-Density Multiple-Family Current Land Use: Office Neighborhood: South Oak Hill City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Page 3 Title: Rezoning – Office Building Located at 8001 Highway 7 BACKGROUND: The following provides a history of the zoning of the property. Recodification: In 1992, the city completed a recodification of the city code. One of the changes resulting from the recodification was elimination of the R-B Residential-Business zoning district. This district allowed a variety of commercial, office, and multiple-family residential uses. The R- B district was replaced with the R-C High-Density Multiple-Family zoning district, which is a multiple-family district, and does not allow commercial uses or new office uses. Due to the change in zoning districts, the zoning map was also amended. The subject property was previously zoned R-B, and was changed to R-C. Zoning Map Pre-1992 Zoning Map Effective 1992 Existing Conditions: The subject property is located on the south side of Highway 7. It is improved with a one-story, 6,400 square foot, multi-tenant office building that was constructed in 1989. View of subject property looking south from Highway 7/Texas Ave intersectio n. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Page 4 Title: Rezoning – Office Building Located at 8001 Highway 7 ANALYSIS: The following is an analysis of the rezoning request. Comprehensive Plan: The property is currently guided Office, so the comprehensive plan land use map does not need to be amended prior to rezoning the property to Office. The proposed zoning is consistent with the planned land use. Area Zoning: The zoning map below reflects the current zoning in the area. The property to the west is the Prince of Peace Evangelical Lutheran Church, and is zoned R-C. The properties to the south and east are single-family homes zoned R-2 Single-Family Residential. The property to the north is the Knollwood Mall, which is zoned C-2 General Commercial. Rezoning the subject property would result in the only property in the area zoned Office, however, the office use is consistent with the existing use of the property which has been in place since 1987, and is compatible with the General Commercial and Institutional use located to the north and west. The site is suitable for office development. It has excellent access and visibility to principal arterials (Hwy 7), nearby amenities and services. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Page 5 Title: Rezoning – Office Building Located at 8001 Highway 7 Permitted Uses: The table below illustrates the uses allowed in each district. The uses are either permitted, permitted with conditions, or conditional use. R-C High-Density Multiple-Family Residence Allowed in Both Districts O Office Permitted Uses: Hotel/motel Permitted uses: Rooming house Adult daycare Business trade school Office, existing before March 1, 1999 Hospital Printing process Group home Educational academic Studio Transit station Group care/nursery school Service Communication towers Banks Permitted with Conditions: Transit station Nursing home Library Permitted w/ Conditions: Community center Medical/dental office < or = classification 6 Multiple-family dwelling Convention hall Cluster housing Private entertainment w/o liquor Adult daycare Restaurant w/o liquor Group care/nursery school Retail Educational Parking lots/ramps Library Limited impact sexually oriented business Communication tower High impact sexually oriented business Office < or = classification 6 Conditional Use: Adult daycare Religious institution Group daycare/nursery school Hostel Hospital Elderly housing Library Hospital Museum Hotel/motel Conditional Use: Motor fuel station Places of assembly In-vehicle sales & service Private entertainment w/ liquor Restaurant w/ liquor Office > classification 6 Medical/dental > classification 6 City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Page 6 Title: Rezoning – Office Building Located at 8001 Highway 7 District Dimensional Standards: The table below compares the dimensional standards allowed in both the R-C and O districts. Dimensional Standard R-C - High-Density Multiple-Family Residence O - Office Height Six-stories, 75 feet 150 feet, 240 feet with CUP Density 50 units per acre N/A Front Yard Greater of 30 feet or height of building Greater of 20 feet or height of building Side Yard 15 feet on one side, half the building height on the other 15 feet on one side, half the building height on the other Rear Yard Greater of 25 feet or height of the building 15 feet Floor Area Ratio 1.2 (31,798 square feet) 1.5 (39,747 square feet) While both districts allow multiple-story buildings and 50 units per acre density, the development potential of the property is limited by its small size. The property is only 26,498 square feet in area, just over half an acre. While the applicant is not intending to redevelop the property, it is conceivable that in either zoning district, the property could support a two-story building. Anything larger would be difficult to meet zoning regulations such as setbacks, DORA, landscaping, and parking. Signage: The applicant is proposing to rezone the property to Office for the purpose of constructing a monument sign that will increase the tenant’s visibility and exposure to traffic on Highway 7. Modifications to the building are not proposed at this time. Below is a comparison of signage allowed for the R-C and O districts. The regulations applicable to the subject property are highlighted in yellow for the existing and proposed zoning district. Use District & Lot Size (sq ft) Maximum Sign Height (feet) Maximum Total Area (sq ft) Maximum Size of Sign Face (sq ft) R-C 0 - 20,000 15 40 40 Over 20,000 15 80 60 O 0 - 20,000 25 100 100 20,000 - 50,000 25 200 100 50,000 - 100,000 25 300 150 Over 100,000 25 500 300 The rezoning to Office, would result in an increase of signage allowed from 80 square feet to 200 square feet. The increase is a measure of sign face area. This means that since the property owner wants to construct a two-sided monument sign, then both sides of the sign count toward the 200 square feet maximum allowed. The property has used up the 80 square feet of sign face area currently allowed. If rezoned to Office, the applicant would get an additional 120 square feet of signage (200 square feet minus the existing 80 square feet located on the building). The largest two-sided monument sign that could be built with the remaining 120 square feet is 60 square feet per side. This sign is in scale with the existing office building and other signs in the area. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Page 7 Title: Rezoning – Office Building Located at 8001 Highway 7 ORDINANCE NO.____-16 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ST. LOUIS PARK ORDINANCE CODE CHANGING BOUNDARIES OF ZONING DISTRICTS 8001 State Highway 7 THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK DOES ORDAIN: Section 1. The City Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission (Case No. 16-29-Z). Section 2. The St. Louis Park Zoning Ordinance adopted December 28, 1959, Ordinance No. 730; amended December 31, 1992, Ordinance No. 1902-93, amended December 17, 2001, Ordinance No. 2216-01, as heretofore amended, is hereby further amended by changing the zoning district boundaries by reclassifying the following described lands from their existing land use district classification to the new land use district classification as indicated for the tract as hereinafter set forth, to wit: Lot 1, Block 1, Lone Star Addition from RC High Density Multiple-Family Residence to O Office. Section 3. The contents of Planning Case File 16-29-Z are hereby entered into and made part of the public hearing record and the record of decision for this case. Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect fifteen days after its publication. Public Hearing August 3, 2016 First Reading September 6, 2016 Second Reading September 19, 2016 Date of Publication September 29, 2016 Date Ordinance takes effect October 14, 2016 Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council September 19, 2016 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Approved as to Form and Execution: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Soren Mattick, City Attorney City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Page 8 Title: Rezoning – Office Building Located at 8001 Highway 7 EXCERPT OF OFFICIAL MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA AUGUST 3, 2016 – 6:00 p.m. COUNCIL CHAMBERS MEMBERS PRESENT: Lynne Carper, Torrey Kanne, Richard Person, Carl Robertson MEMBERS ABSENT: Claudia Johnston-Madison, Lisa Peilen, Joe Tatalovich Ethan Rickert (youth member) 3. Public Hearings A. Rezoning from High Density Multifamily Residence to Office Location: 8001 State Highway 7 Applicant: 8001 Highway Seven, LLC (Steven Thiel) Case No.: 16-29-Z Gary Morrison, Assistant Zoning Administrator, presented the staff report. The application has been made to rezone the property to Office for the purpose of increasing the amount of signage the property is allowed. The applicant would like to construct a monument sign that will increase the tenants’ visibility and exposure to traffic on Highway 7. Mr. Morrison provided background on the site and explained how the site is suitable for office development. Commissioner Kanne asked if the proposed sign would have lighting. Mr. Morrison stated that the sign very likely would be back lit. The standard signage ordinance conditions would apply to it and it could be back lit or electronic. Commissioner Person opened the public hearing. As no one was present wishing to speak he closed the public hearing. Commissioner Robertson made a motion recommending approval to rezone the property from R-C High-Density Multiple-Family Residential to O Office. Commissioner Carper seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 4-0. City Council Meeting of September 6, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Page 9 Title: Rezoning – Office Building Located at 8001 Highway 7 AERIAL PHOTO