Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016/08/15 - ADMIN - Agenda Packets - City Council - RegularAGENDA AUGUST 15, 2016 (Councilmember Hallfin Out) 6:00 p.m. SPECIAL STUDY SESSION – Community Room Discussion Items 1. 6:00 p.m. 2017 Budget Update 7:25 p.m. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY -- Council Chambers 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes 3a. Economic Development Authority Meeting Minutes July 18, 2016 3b. Economic Development Authority Meeting Minutes August 1, 2016 4. Approval of Agenda 5. Reports -- None 6. Old Business -- None 7. New Business 7a. Subordination Agreement with PNC Bank – Cedar Lake Rd Apartments LLC Recommended Action: Motion to Adopt EDA Resolution approving the Subordination Agreement with PNC Bank, National Association relative to the Redevelopment Contract with Cedar Lake Road Apartments LLC. 8. Communications -- None 9. Adjournment 7:30 p.m. CITY COUNCIL MEETING – Council Chambers 1. Call to Order 1a. Pledge of Allegiance 1b. Roll Call 2. Presentations 2a. Westwood Hills Nature Center Junior Naturalists Recognition 2b. Recognition of Donations 3. Approval of Minutes 3a. Special Study Session Meeting Minutes July 18, 2016 3b. City Council Meeting Minutes July 18, 2016 3c. Special Study Session Minutes of August 1, 2016 Meeting of August 15, 2016 City Council Agenda 4. Approval of Agenda and Items on Consent Calendar NOTE: The Consent Calendar lists those items of business which are considered to be routine and/or which need no discussion. Consent items are acted upon by one motion. If discussion is desired by either a Councilmember or a member of the audience, that item may be moved to an appropriate section of the regular agenda for discussion. The items for the Consent Calendar are listed on the last page of the Agenda. Recommended Action: Motion to approve the Agenda as presented and items listed on the Consent Calendar; and to waive reading of all resolutions and ordinances. (Alternatively: Motion to add or remove items from the agenda, or move items from Consent Calendar to regular agenda for discussion.) 5. Boards and Commissions -- None 6. Public Hearings 6a. St. Louis Park Liquor – Off Sale Intoxicating Liquor License (Ownership Change) Recommended Action: Mayor to open and close public hearing. Motion to approve application from Kevin Tran dba St. Louis Park Liquor for an Off-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for the premises located at 6316 Minnetonka Boulevard, for the license term ending March 1, 2017. 6b. Parkway 25 - Public Hearing and First Reading of Ordinance Vacating Drainage and Utility Easements Recommended Action: Mayor to open the public hearing, take public testimony, and then close the hearing. Motion to approve First Reading of an Ordinance vacating drainage utility easements and set the Second Reading of Ordinance for September 6, 2016 (five affirmative votes required). 7. Requests, Petitions, and Communications from the Public – None 8. Resolutions, Ordinances, Motions and Discussion Items 8a. Master Marketing Agreement – Discover St. Louis Park and City of Golden Valley Recommended Action: Motion to approve and ratify the Master Marketing Agreement between Discover St. Louis Park (DSLP) and the City of Golden Valley. 8b. Ordinance Amending St. Louis Park City Code Chapter 3, Section 70 (g)(1) Recommended Action: Motion to approve the first reading of an ordinance amending St. Louis Park City Code Chapter 3 , Section 70 (g)(1) to Exempt Congressionally Chartered Veterans Organizations Holding a Club Liquor License from the 50% Food Ratio Requirement and to schedule the second reading of the ordinance on September 6, 2016. 8c. Consulting Services for Community Visioning Initiative Recommended Action: Motion to direct Staff to negotiate a final contract and scope of work with Next Generation Consulting for St. Louis Parks Community Visioning process and authorize execution of the contract by the City Manager and Mayor. 8d. Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Recommended Action: Motion to approve the Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) and Preliminary and Final Plat subject to conditions as recommended by staff and set the second reading of the PUD ordinance for September 6, 2016. Meeting of August 15, 2016 City Council Agenda Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. To make arrangements, please call the Administration Department at 952/924-2525 (TDD 952/924-2518) at least 96 hours in advance of meeting. 8e. 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Recommended Action: Motion to approve the Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) and Preliminary and Final Plat subject to conditions as recommended by staff and set the second reading for September 6, 2016. 8f. Meadowbrook Manor – Conditional Use Permit Recommended Action: Motion to Adopt Resolution granting a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for Meadowbrook Manor and allowing construction of a Clubhouse, Swimming Pool and Maintenance Shed, and associated grading work at 6922-6932 Meadowbrook Blvd, subject to conditions recommended by Staff. 8g. Arlington Row West Plat Revision and First Reading Major PUD Amendment Recommended Action:  Motion to Adopt Resolution approving the major amendment to the Final Plat of Arlington Row West.  Motion to approve First Reading of Ordinance amending Chapter 32 of the City Code relating to Arlington Row West Planned Unit Development, and to schedule the Second Reading for September 6, 2016. 8h. Arlington Row East Planned Unit Development (PUD) Major Amendment Recommended Action: Motion to approve First Reading of an Ordinance amending Chapter 32 of the City Code relating to Arlington Row East Planned Unit Development, and set the Second Reading for September 6, 2016. 8i. First Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Pertaining to Accessory Buildings and Signs Recommended Action: Motion to approve the First Reading of an Ordinance amending the Zoning Code pertaining to accessory buildings and signage, and to set the Second Reading for September 6, 2016. 9. Communications – None Meeting of August 15, 2016 City Council Agenda CONSENT CALENDAR 4a. Approve Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance amending Chapter 36 of the St. Louis Park Code of Ordinances relating to zoning to opt-out of Minnesota Statutes Section 462.3593 which defines and regulates Temporary Family Health Care Dwellings, and to approve the Summary Ordinance for Publication. 4b. Approve right-of-way purchase in the total amount of $130,500 for Parcel 12 (R & N Real Estate, LLC for 3501 Louisiana Ave) and authorize the City Attorney to execute stipulation of settlement. 4c. Adopt Resolution approving acceptance of a monetary donation from Jeanne and Steve Prawer in the amount of $2,200 for Westwood Hills Nature Center. 4d. Adopt Resolution acknowledging the issuance of a substitute confirming letter of credit to secure the City’s variable rate demand multifamily housing refunding revenue bonds (Urban Park Apartments Project), series 2010B, and approving and authorizing the execution of documents related thereto. 4e. Adopt Resolution authorizing the special assessment for the repair of the sewer service line at 2731 Salem Avenue South, St. Louis Park, Minnesota. P.I.D. 31-029-24-32- 0140 4f. Adopt Resolution authorizing the elimination of permit parking restrictions in front of 3125 Idaho Avenue South. 4g. Adopt Resolution supporting the partnership between Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) and Park Nicollet to protect, restore, enhance, and maintain Minnehaha Creek. 4h. Adopt Resolution accepting work and authorizing final payment in the amount of $65,254.02 for Project 2012-1000 Local Street Rehabilitation Project (Area 1) with ASTECH Corporation, Contract No. 35-13. 4i. Approve for filing Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of July 20, 2016. St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority and regular City Council meetings are carried live on Civic TV cable channel 17 and replays are frequent; check www.parktv.org for the schedule. The meetings are also streamed live on the internet at www.parktv.org, and saved for Video on Demand replays. The agenda is posted on Fridays on the official city bulletin board in the lobby of City Hall and on the text display on Civic TV cable channel 17. The agenda and full packet are available by noon on Friday on the city’s website. Meeting: Special Study Session Meeting Date: August 15, 2016 Discussion Item: 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: 2017 Budget Update RECOMMENDED ACTION: No formal action required. This report is to assist with the Study Session discussion regarding the 2017 Budget and to receive direction for further conversation at the September 6th Special Study Session, in preparation for setting the 2017 Preliminary Property Tax Levy on September 19, 2016. POLICY CONSIDERATION:  Is the levy range at this time within target levels for Council based on services levels provided?  Does the Council want to certify the maximum HRA levy amount for the 2017 levy?  Is the Council in support of the proposed utility rate adjustment plans?  Is there other information that Council would like to review in more detail?  Are there any other service delivery changes Council would like to have considered? SUMMARY: Included is information pertaining to the 2017 Budget and 2017 Preliminary General Property Tax and HRA levies. The City Manager and staff are currently analyzing submitted budgets for 2017. Also included in the report are some items of significance that are being considered. In addition, staff would like direction on any other major changes, programs, or policies that should be evaluated during the preparation of the 2017 Budget. Finally, there is a brief discussion on utility rates. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Information regarding the budget, tax levies, and utility rates are provided in this report. VISION CONSIDERATION: All Vision areas are taken into consideration and are an important part of the budgeting process. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion Follow-up Questions from June 20th Budget Study Session Prepared by: Tim Simon, Chief Financial Officer Reviewed by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Special Study Session Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 1) Page 2 Title: 2017 Budget Update DISCUSSION BACKGROUND: On June 20, 2016, staff met with the City Council to discuss the 2017 Budget Process. Council agreed that staff should follow recommendations from the “2017 Budget Production Guidelines” when preparing the 2017 Budget. Assumptions for the 2017 Budget included a pattern similar to past years; a levy increase, modest increase in other fees and charges where appropriate to fit with business costs, maintain high quality and responsive service delivery, hold expenditures flat where possible with adjustments for some modest growth based on essential business needs, funding for a wage and benefit contribution increase, utility rate adjustments, and continued long range financial planning. In addition, Council discussed business needs and operations as it related to preparing the 2017 budget. Staff has provided follow up information as an attachment to this report. Discussion Topics – Monday, August 15th: The purpose of the Study Session discussion is to make sure service delivery and business needs are congruent with Council expectations in preparing the 2017 Budget. For 2017, staff used the budget guiding principles, as well as Vision, and the new key organizational cultural behaviors of Collaboration, Quality and Responsiveness for preparing budget recommendations. The Study Session discussion is intended to be at the higher level to allow Council, if possible, to provide levy direction to staff as well as identify other initiatives they would like staff to add or explore. Based upon this discussion, staff can then prepare more information to bring back to the City Council as needed at a later date. Below is the outline of the budget presentation and discussion for this Study Session: 1. Discussion on overall budget, department requests, and council requested items for staff to explore. 2. 2017 Preliminary Property Tax Levy range discussion. 3. 2017 Preliminary HRA Levy discussion. 4. Council questions, comments, expectations, and data requests for upcoming meetings, including the budget calendar. Budget Webpage and E-mail: As Council is aware, in an effort to provide a more transparent budget process, staff has created a webpage on the City’s website and an e-mail address for any questions that arise. The link is: http://www.stlouispark.org/finance/city-budget.html and the e-mail address is: budget@stlouispark.org. The 2017 Preliminary Budget Items of Significance: Legislative directives:  There are no levy limits in place for 2017.  Local Government Aid for 2017 has been certified, St. Louis Park will receive $545,470 which is $6,036 more than the $539,434 certified for 2016. These dollars go into the Capital Replacement Fund. Staffing Costs wages: Funds for staffing are the largest expenditure of the City’s operating budget. In building the 2017 budget recommendations, a wage adjustment of 2.75% is being used as an assumption. As a reminder, Dispatch and Local 49 Maintenance contracts are settled for two years 2016 & 2017, Patrol and Sergeants are still in active negotiations for 2016, Fire settled for one year and is open in 2017. Special Study Session Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 1) Page 3 Title: 2017 Budget Update PERA Coordinated Plan: Employee contribution of 6.50% of salary and employer contribution of 7.50% of salary in 2016 will remain the same at this point in 2017. PERA Police and Fire: Employee contribution of 10.8% and employer contribution of 16.2% in 2016 will remain the same at this point in 2017. Benefits: For 2017, staff is working on renewal with our current carrier Health Partners on renewal rates. We have 2 years (2017 & 2018) before we have to go out for formal bids and have asked for rates for both one and two years. Based on our experience and trend we estimated and recommended an overall increase of 12% for 2017 (built into the 2017 budget at this time). The good news is based on preliminary information, it appears that rates will come in lower than 12%. We will have more information on rates in the near future. Staff continues to work with the City’s benefits consultant and internal benefits committee on cost containment on claims. The wellness benefit for 2016 was set at $40 per employee per month and is recommended to remain the same in 2017. Operational Costs: Staff is being asked to look at how operational costs have been changing with the ever changing market conditions, as well as planning ahead for operational needs with focus areas relating to the environment, trails and sidewalks, transportation, ongoing development, continued strength in public safety, fire prevention, neighborhoods and housing. Energy costs will continue to be monitored closely given the potential for volatility in this sector of the economy. Summary of Significant 2017 Budget Personnel Requests: The most significant requests received from departments in the 2017 budget relate to staffing. All requests are in the process of being reviewed by the City Manager with each applicable Department Director. In order to determine the final recommendations staff will continue to review business needs and funding and also look at alternatives for service delivery with some requests and moving some requests to future year(s) for consideration. Below is the summary of staffing requests and funding recommendations. Note – these are the staffing requests made by Department Directors and do not constitute at this time a recommendation from the City Manager. What staffing additions or changes are requested at this time for 2017?  Administrative Services - Election Judges - $45,000 (decrease) – Cyclical for Presidential election and municipal primary elections. General Fund is the funding source.  Administrative Services – Appraiser I – $90,119 – FT benefit earning – Increase in assessing volume and workload, would replace part-time position of $32,068 (decrease) if approved. General Fund is the funding source.  Fire Department - Overtime - $56,250 – Increase suggested based on call volume, new family leave policy, staff development, and staff engagement. General Fund is the funding source.  Fire Department - Paid on Call (POC) - $8,000 – Increase in wage adjustment. General Fund is the funding source.  Fire Department – Supplemental pay - $12,350 – Increase in fire prevention assignments with two more in 2017. General Fund is the funding source.  Fire Department - 2 Firefighters - FT benefit earning - $191,252 - Increase in call volume and demand for service. The fire department has applied for an AFG SAFER grant which would cover the cost of the positions for the first two years. More information on the grant Special Study Session Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 1) Page 4 Title: 2017 Budget Update should be coming in the next few weeks. Funding source if the grant is not approved would be General Fund. Note that the Fire Department requested three new fire fighter positions last year. One firefighter position was recommended by the City Manager and approved by the Council with a start date of July 1, 2016. If the grant is not approved the City Manager will likely recommend a similar approach for 2017 (add one firefighter)  Inspections – Temporary Construction Codes Inspector - $92,251- PT benefit earning – To allow for increased inspection services over the next 18 months assuming construction continues or grows from the current pace and a number of significant building permits come in later this year. General Fund is the funding source with potential additional building permit revenue offset.  Inspections- Overtime adjustment- $11,569- Increased inspections due to the number of inspections activity. General Fund is the funding source.  Police – Intern - $22,728 – To provide support and assistance to staff working on programs and initiatives that provide a high level of service to the community. General Fund is the funding source.  Police-temporary employees - $12,000 – Increase CSO/Cadet positions pay range. General fund is the funding source.  Operations and Recreation – Rec., Rec. Center, Pool & Outdoor facility – Temporary salaries- $46,950 – Minimum wage increases and temporary employees for new outdoor facility. General Fund is the funding source.  Operations and Recreation – Park Maintenance – Temporary salaries – $12,000 –Minimum wage increases and market adjustment for pay range. General Fund is the funding source.  Operations and Recreation- Westwood – Temporary salaries - $6,200 – Minimum wage increases and market adjustment for pay range. General Fund is the funding source.  Operations and Recreation – Solid Waste – Recycling Intern - $22,729 – To assist with delivery of solid waste council initiatives including work on GIS data for the program. Solid Waste enterprise fund is the funding source. Summary of Significant 2017 Budget Non-personnel Requests That Are Included:  Administrative Services – Increased expenditure projections came in for estimated property, liability and casualty insurance - $10,586. Recodify the city and zoning code and implement online hosting feature - $18,300. Adjust legal fees to historical actuals - $22,000. Implement a healthy living grants program - $15,000. In addition, decrease in revenues and expenditures for Health in the Park program that ends in 2016.  Engineering – Increase of $20,000 for right of way permit revenues to reflect prior actuals.  Fire – The cumulative increase in expenditures is approximately $35,000 for supplies, small tools, repairs, ARMOR leasing & HC radio costs, increased compliance testing or equipment, CERT member training, professional development and wellness.  Information Resources – Increase of $7,500 for environmentally preferable purchasing policy and $10,000 other contractual services in communications/marketing.  Inspections – Proposed increase of permit revenues of approximately $125,000 based on historical and projected projects in 2017. Facility Maintenance utility costs are estimated Special Study Session Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 1) Page 5 Title: 2017 Budget Update to increase $17,000 to purchase wind power credits, which would only be for the buildings overseen by facilities maintenance.  Operations and Recreation – Revenues are projected to increase by $330,000 due to rink renovations being complete and back to normalized ice rental, program fee changes and new outdoor facility. On the expenditure side, proposed increase for Public Works Operations of $40,000 for additional concrete alley, sidewalks, curb and gutter repairs. Additional funds for the outdoor facility have been planned including concessions, advertising, and contractual services.  Police - The budget requests funds to replace the 23 year old “throw phone” for the crisis negotiation team - $22,000. In addition, funds are requested to replace 20 year old squad car rifles - $58,000. Since these are one-time expenses and the contingency has not been used YTD, staff is recommending that these items are purchased using the 2016 contingency line item and removed from the 2017 budget.  Contingency – We are currently working with a consultant to review and recommend updates to our compensation plan. Our current plan has been in place since 1997. Part of the study is to review our current compensation program, paygrades and ranges and pay equity compliance. The compensation plan review will also look closely at how we compare to market with all of our employee groups. The market we have used and recommend that we continue to use for comparison is metro cities population greater than 25,000 but less than 90,000 (up to and including Bloomington, MN). Under our current program, the compensation plan requires a difference in salary comparison when looking at the exempt and non-exempt market. When reviewing salaries in the market, our current program requires comparison at the 75th percentile level for exempt (non-overtime eligible), and for non-exempt to compare at market average or 50th percentile. As part of this study, we are looking at moving the non-exempt market comparison up to 75th percentile, allowing the same level of market comparison for all positions exempt and non- exempt. The same type of formula used for salary comparison provides a more equitable comparison (same standards/metrics used) regardless if eligible for overtime or not. This standardized approach is more commonly found in the public sector market rather than a split when comparing market. Salary ranges and management practices would be used to manage overall compensation. This type of change in market comparison for non-exempt positions will also help with recruitment. To implement this type of plan, funds will need to be set aside to allow for possible additional movement in the pay ranges. The General Fund contingency budget is recommended to have $386,295 set aside for this change for 2017, which includes 1% of personal expenses for possible compensation plan adjustment (movement if there is a change in grade level). In addition setting aside funds if we implement phasing in and using a market comparison of 75th percentile for non-exempt (overtime eligible) staff. Staff plans to bring this information regarding updating the compensation plan to Council at an upcoming study session.  Cable TV Fund – Staff recommends continuing with the plan to reduce the transfer from the Cable TV Fund to the General Fund by $25,000 per year. Reducing the annual transfer by $25,000 each year through 2019 and by $34,506 in 2020 will improve sustainability in the fund until the franchise fee agreement expires in 2021. At that point, if no new agreement is available, the fund could operate through 2022 and into early 2023 before running out of resources as currently budgeted. Special Study Session Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 1) Page 6 Title: 2017 Budget Update Fees, Charges and Other Revenues - Staff will continue to review current fee data based on cost analyses and other communities before making recommendations for the 2017 Fee Schedules for the Council to consider later this year. CIP (Capital Improvement Plan) - Staff has completed the first and second round work on the CIP, and a draft will be provided on September 6th. This information has been programmed into the LRFMP, and Finance is analyzing the results in an effort to create long-term sustainability in funds and is also looking at where changes in funding or expenditures/expenses need to occur for the City Council and City Manager to consider. LRFMP (Long Range Financial Management Plan): This document will be presented at future meetings with Council to assist in setting property tax levies, debt management, fees, utility rates and budgets. Trends in Valuations and Possible Property Tax Implications: For the 2016 assessment, St. Louis Park’s taxable market value increased by 8.1% with all of the dominant property types increasing in value. Composition of the change is summarized as +5.3% for single-family homes, +10.6 for condos, +6.7 for townhomes, +17.8% for apartments, and the commercial-industrial sectors at +9.6%. As can be surmised by the above figures, there will be a shift of the property tax burden to commercial, condos, and apartment properties for the Payable 2017 tax period. This shift will be mitigated somewhat when considering all taxing jurisdictions that make up the typical property tax bill (in the aggregate, other County jurisdictions increased at higher rates for single-family homes but at lower rates for apartments and commercial properties). Fiscal Disparities: The City’s proposed net tax capacity contribution increased by $1,086,206 or approximately 34% for 2017. In 2016, the net tax capacity contribution decreased by $710,663 or approximately 18.3%. 2016 City Final Levy and 2017 City Preliminary Levy Range A synopsis of prior year levy information and the 2017 Proposed Preliminary Levy Range is shown below: 1. The 2016 Preliminary levy was $28,738,974, which was 6.50% more than 2015. 2. The 2016 Final levy was $28,604,474, which was 6.0% more than 2015. 3. At this point in time, the budgets which have been submitted and debt service needs would require a 2017 Preliminary Property Tax Levy range increase of approximately 6.50% - 7.00% more than the 2016 Final Levy. The levy will be discussed in further detail at the September 6th budget work session. Special Study Session Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 1) Page 7 Title: 2017 Budget Update 2016 2017 $ Change % Change Final Levy Proposed Levy 2016 to 2017 2016 to 2017 TAX CAPACITY BASED TAX LEVY General Fund 23,597,282$ 25,131,105$ 1,533,823$ 6.50% Park Improvement Fund 810,000 810,000 - 0.00% Capital Replacement Fund 1,767,700 1,767,700 - 0.00% Debt Service-current 1,517,667 2,139,937 622,270 41.00% Debt Service-future 477,825 300,000 (177,825) -37.22% Employee Benefit Fund 200,000 200,000 - 0.00% Housing Rehabilitation Fund 100,000 100,000 - 0.00% Council Programs (1)134,000 134,000 - 0.00% TAX CAPACITY BASED TAX LEVIES 28,604,474$ 30,582,742$ 1,978,268$ 6.92% *=levy will be adjusted as we continue the budget review. 1= Council programs line item was anticipated to be used for Council programs/initiatives like the climate action plan for 2016. For 2017, these funds may want to be considered for race and equity or community outreach type programs. HRA Levy Based on current and future infrastructure needs, the HRA Levy is recommended to be set at the maximum allowed of 0.0185% of estimated market value for the 2017 Budget, which is consistent with previous years. This levy is committed to pay back a loan from the Development Fund that helped cash flow the City’s obligation for Highway 7 and Louisiana and is expected to be paid off by 2019. By law these funds could also be used for other housing and redevelopment purposes but considering the significant infrastructure needs within the City, the proceeds have not been used for housing. Therefore, staff has calculated the maximum HRA Levy for 2017 to be $1,086,460 based on valuation data from Hennepin County. This is an increase of $75,253 or 7.44% from 2016. Staff is recommending the 2017 Preliminary HRA Levy be set at the maximum. Utility Funds: All utility funds will be presented during the budget process as in previous years with a review of rates in accordance with the City’s Long Range Financial Management Plan (LRFMP). As in previous years, all utility rates are analyzed and adjusted as needed to meet operational and capital needs, while also working to meet appropriate cash position guidelines.  Water: For 2017, the City will be in the seventh year of the ten year plan for increasing the fixed rate charges to reduce volatility in the fund due to seasonality usage fluctuations. Usage rates will also be increased to meet more aggressive demands for infrastructure replacement within the City’s aging system. Significant expenses for this fund are capital, staffing, the Reilly Superfund site and debt service. Staff will further study water conservation, irrigation and rates to prepare for recommendations for 2018.  Sewer: Rates are also expected to increase due to the City’s more aggressive infrastructure replacement plan. Sewer costs are mainly to support the Metropolitan Council of Environmental Services charge (MCES), staffing and capital costs.  Solid Waste: Rates for this fund are expected to increase slightly to continue to support more of a pay as you throw type rate structure. Rates may also increase depending on any enhanced or new initiatives the Council would like to pursue with single family organics and multi-family recycling and organics. The major expenses for this fund are the contract charges and staffing. Special Study Session Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 1) Page 8 Title: 2017 Budget Update  Storm Water: With the interest the Council and community has in surface water, staff will continue to develop, modify, connect and communicate programs to both the City Council and the community. Based on Council direction to place more emphasis on storm water management, along with increasing regulations, rates will need to continue to be adjusted over the next three to four years. These increases will help meet the increased capital needs and debt service obligations. Significant expenses for this fund currently are capital and staffing. NEXT STEPS: As the 2017 budget process continues, the following preliminary schedule snapshot has been developed for Council: September 6 (Tues) High level 2017 Budget, CIP (first draft), and utility rates discussion. Department Directors or their designees will also be in attendance as needed. This meeting will be more of a proposed preliminary levy discussion with direction provided to staff to prepare information for the September 19th meeting adopting preliminary levies. In addition, the EDA and City Council will adopt the HRA levy. September 19 Council sets 2017 preliminary property tax levy. (Levies can be decreased, but not increased for final property tax levies.) October 10 Review and discussion of 2017 budget, CIP, fees, utility rates and LRFMP. Directors or their designees in attendance as needed. October 17 Public Hearing - 1st Reading of Fees, and adoption of 2017 Utility Rates November 7 (If necessary) Final budget or CIP discussion prior to Truth in Taxation Public Hearing and budget presentation. 2nd Reading of Fee on Consent. December 5 Truth in Taxation Public Hearing and budget presentation December 12 (If necessary) Continuation of Public Hearing and any budget discussion. December 19 Council adopts 2016 Revised Budget, 2017 Budgets, final tax levies (City and HRA), and 2017 - 2026 CIP. Follow-up Questions from June 20th Budget Study Session At the Study Session on June 20th, 2016, Council discussed business needs and operations as it related to preparing the 2017 budget. As part of the discussion, there were requests for information and follow-up on a number of areas. Listed below are the questions from the study sessions and department responses. More information can be provided if needed. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Council Meeting Facilitation QUESTION: High School uses an equity coach for the Board in some discussions; what would it cost for us? ANSWER: We bring in a facilitator to the annual Council workshop and to other public meetings as needed. Funds are available in our general fund under professional services if Council would like to do something similar. If Council is interested in doing this on a more regular basis, we should have a discussion to help define what type of facilitation is desired. Facilities Study QUESTION: When will Council have a conversation on the Facilities Study: Funding for Civic Center, Teen Center etc. planning, consultant, and analysis? Will we work with the school or independently? ANSWER: Thus far a sub group of the City Council and School Board have been meeting to discuss facilities. More information should be available this fall. As for the Teen Center, CEAC has become engaged in this initiative and will be presented more info in September. Future study session time will need to be set with Council for this conversation and to further define community need, scope, timeframe, possible partnerships and funding. Race and Equity Funding QUESTION: What funding is needed to continue working on this initiative? ANSWER: For 2016, funding is in place to provide training for staff. For 2017, funding will be set aside to assist as we continue to move ahead with our Race and Equity initiatives and communication. Benefits QUESTION: Where are we compared to other cities with benefits, i.e. are we competitive? ANSWER: Comparing benefit plans can be complex since the specific plan designs and details of each plan can vary drastically. However, in plans similar to our most utilized plan, St. Louis Park employees appear to receive a significantly better benefit if they choose employee only health insurance, and very near the market average benefit for family health insurance. St. Louis Park employees receive a higher contribution than any other city to a health savings account or reimbursement arrangement for a high deductible health plan. See more detail on following page. Special Study Session Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: 2017 Budget Update Page 9 Human Resources has surveyed other metro suburban cities with populations between 25,000  and 90,000 (our standard market comparable cities) and compared employee cost for benefits  most similar to St. Louis Park’s $2500/$5000 high deductible plan with VEBA.  The table below  shows how St. Louis Park’s out of pocket benefit costs compare to others in our market:     Market Average  Employee Monthly  Cost  St. Louis Park  Employee Monthly  Cost  Comments    Employee Only  Coverage    ($70.62)     This reflects an average  amount the employee  receives in cash back to  purchase other  benefits.    ($166.00)     SLP employees can use  these funds to purchase  dental insurance,  supplemental life  insurance, or make a  deferred compensation  contribution.      Individual responses from  cities ranged from employees  receiving as much as ($448.50)  back each month, to  employees being required to  contribute up to $165.55 for  employee only coverage.      St. Louis Park employees  receive significantly more  than average benefit for  employee only coverage.      Family Coverage    $542.51 $551.00    Individual responses ranged  from a low employee cost of  $230.16 to a high of  $1,077.32.      St. Louis Park employees pay  slightly higher than average  for family coverage.      Annual City  Contribution to  Family Health  Savings Account   or Health  Reimbursement  Arrangement (HSA  or HRA/VEBA)      $1,785.64 $3,500.00    Individual responses ranged  from cities not even offering  an HSA/HRA to contributing as  much as $3,460.00 per year.      St. Louis Park had the highest  contribution.         Special Study Session Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: 2017 Budget Update Page 10 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT  STEP Funding  QUESTION:  What is the current level of funding contribution for STEP and should the city promote  a private matching program?  What is our current rental assistance funding and should more  funds go to STEP for this program?  ANSWER: The annual City contribution to STEP was $45,000 this year.  In 2017 we are proposing  a 2% increase. It is further recommended that the contribution to STEP be automatically  increased for subsequent years by 2%  In addition we have provided a $15,000 onetime  contribution for STEP’s Emergency Assistance fund which almost exclusively provides rent  assistance to families experiencing a temporary financial crises. This money is leveraging a  contribution from the Park Nicollet Foundation.      Walker/Lake Street Area  QUESTION:  Are there funds for future planning, consulting, and analysis for the Walker/Lake  Street area?  What is the timeframe for this analysis in this specific area?  ANSWER: Ideally we will have an Activation Plan done this winter and start implementing  improvements in the area in the summer 2017.  An “Activation Plan” is a term used by the consultant  to refer to the next steps/implementation plan for bringing vitality to the area.  Housing  QUESTION:  What do we need to do to keep, invest in and maintain naturally occurring affordable  housing?   ANSWER: Recently, staff participated in a meeting of the SWLRT Housing Committee which  includes representatives from all the cities along the corridor as well as Hennepin County, Met  Council, MN Housing, Family Housing Fund and Twin Cities LISC. One of the agenda topics was  the preservation of naturally occurring affordable housing. A follow‐up meeting to explore this  topic in greater detail has been scheduled for August 11. Also note that ULI has indicated that  this is a topic that has come up with the Regional Council of Mayors (of which Michele Schnitker  is a member) and that ULI would like to propose working with the SWLRT Housing Group on  regional/local initiatives related to this issue.  We’ve asked our city attorney to review the  recommendations made by the Housing Justice Center to help cities preserve affordable  housing.  Given that some of the recommendations involve the city implementing official  controls/ordinances to preserve housing, we want to know if any of the measures would require  legislative action to authorize cities to do so.  Staff will also be meeting  in the near future with  Jeremy Schroeder of the Minnesota Housing Partnership to discuss this issue and the recent  initiatives undertaken by MHP to establish the Homegrown Fund, a metropolitan‐wide funding  source to assist in the preservation of affordable housing units.     QUESTION: How do we make sure we continue funding and communication of programs such as  Blackstone assistance with rehab?  Communication on our programs?   ANSWER: We use a variety of methods to get the word out on housing assistance programs  offered by the City.  Articles related to the programs are included in the Park Perspective,  information is included on the City’s web page and we have utilized the utility billing mailings to  distribute information in the past.  Information is also distributed at the Annual Remodeling Fair  and Home Remodeling Tour and various City functions like the Fire Open House.    Special Study Session Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: 2017 Budget Update Page 11 ENGINEERING  Connect the Park  QUESTION:  Is there funding for additional areas if requested and to connect the disconnected  portions that just end without connecting to system.  ANSWER: Yes for specific disconnected portions.  As a part of the CIP process last spring, we added  the cost to construct “additional areas if requested to connect the disconnected portions” i.e.  gaps.  We have not included a cost to construct sidewalks on streets where no sidewalks exist  today or where there is sidewalk on one side of the street and not on the other.  If new segments  are requested/added we would need to plan for this type of addition and determine cost and  funding source. Our gaps analysis strictly looked at segments where the sidewalk ends and does  not connect to the network.      INSPECTIONS/FACILITIES  Energy Efficiency Improvements for Facilities   QUESTION: Can you provide information on how the Climate Action Plan results and  recommendations will be incorporated into the budget?    ANSWER:  The initial energy conserving improvements started in 2009 that were identified during  the McKinstry energy audit are being completed in 2016. Also, through regular facilities  evaluation and the process of planning for building and equipment maintenance, the proposed  CIP continues to include many items for enhancing energy conservation.  With the lowering cost  and improvements in panel efficiency, installation of a roof mounted photo‐voltaic system on the  MSC is included to begin city generation of renewable energy.   In addition to reducing the carbon  footprint, payback on investment is now available in 10‐15 year range depending on various Xcel  programs and development options. Other opportunities will be evaluated through the Climate  Action Plan consultants work and integrated into future CIP proposals for consideration.  Once  we have the information from the Climate Action Plan we will incorporate them into our plans.     OPERATIONS AND RECREATION  Outdoor Rec Facilities Maintenance   QUESTION: With all the expansion on facilities in Recreation do we need more maintenance?  ANSWER: The current plan is to operate the new outdoor recreation facility with part‐ time/seasonal staff. We have the ability to have more time scheduled at the Rec Center during  March‐May and September‐October, when the shared position is normally working out of the  MSC in Parks/Public Works/Utilities; this would reduce the staff level at the MSC during the  aforementioned time period. Staff will plan to review the first year of operation and present  Council with any additional staffing requests for the 2018 budget.    Rec Center Maintenance  QUESTION: Rec Center maintenance and facelift needed, cleaning, rusty window sills and bathrooms.  It’s very important that this facility be cleaned and upgraded. What is the maintenance plan?  ANSWER: To assist with maintenance needs we contract cleaning service of the Rec Center and  increased service level hours in 2015. We currently have contracted cleaning 5 out of 7  days/week in the evening, the other 2 days are covered by our Rec Center maintenance staff. In  the fall of 2016 the mirrors and fixtures in the main bathroom will be replaced.  There is $175,000  Special Study Session Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: 2017 Budget Update Page 12 for exterior building repair in the 2016 CIP and we plan to address this area once all of the current  construction is complete. If there are other specific needs staff would like more detailed  information. Below is a schedule of upcoming improvements:    2017   Upgrade banquet room furniture $15,000   Update building pneumatics $200,000   Replace hot water heater/tank $20,000   Replace office carpeting $17,000   Replace pool filters $200,000   Upgrade pool pumps $20,000   Upgrade concession stand equipment $20,000  2018   Remodel/paint Gallery & Banquet Room $50,000   Upgrade front entrance $120,000   Replace landscaping $15,000   Replace east arena roof $500,000   Replace west area upper windows $40,000  2019    Upgrade banquet room furniture $15,000   Replace front office AC unit $75,000   East rink locker room remodel $50,000   East rink scoreboard replacement $30,000   Replace pool deck furniture $5,000  2020   Aquatic park amenity replacement $300,000   Banquet room PA upgrade $50,000   Add marquee $200,000   Replace sun shelters $60,000   Replace skate rentals $10,000   Parking lot seal $10,000   Replace aquatic park main drains $25,000   Concession stand equipment upgrade $5,000  2021   Replace pool deck furniture $5,000   Arena compressor rebuild $15,000   Replace rubber flooring $250,000   Dasherboard maintenance/upkeep/replace $25,000   Replace landscaping $15,000   Replace skate rentals $10,000  Special Study Session Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: 2017 Budget Update Page 13 The list below shows improvements made at the Rec Center since 2010     Replaced skate tile in west locker rooms ($45,000)   Upgraded pool showers ($104,000)   Relocated Skate Shop ($20,000)   Upgraded East Rink dehumidification ($300,000)   Upgraded rink lights (2011, $51,000)   Upgraded West Rink Locker Rooms ($100,000)   Upgraded parking lot medians ($10,000)   Drain replacement in Aquatic Park ($30,000)   Addressed ADA access to Pool/Rec Center ($30,000)   Updated banquet room and gallery ($40,000)   Added concession stand AC ($50,000)   New skate rentals ($12,000)   Upgraded fire alarm ($80,000)   Replaced banquet room furniture ($12,000)   Painted East Arena ($40,000)   Replaced program office windows ($20,000)   Resurfaced pool ($260,000)   Resurfaced water slides ($90,000)   Painted West Arena ($50,000)   Upgraded pool amenities ($75,000)   Re‐keyed building ($15,000)   Re‐landscaped Aquatic Park ($80,000)   Replace banquet room carpet ($35,000); to be completed in Fall 2016    Pool Lifespan  QUESTION:  What is the lifespan of the pool and are we planning for upkeep/upgrades if needed?  ANSWER: We have schedule to replace/significantly upgrade the aquatic park in 2023  ($10,000,000).    Boulevard Trees  QUESTION: Can you provide information on what it would cost if the city shifted to 100% cost  coverage for boulevard trees?  ANSWER: Currently we split the boulevard tree removal 50/50 with the homeowner. The City  spends $65,000 to remove boulevard trees. If a policy change was made to cover 100% of  removal, an additional $65,000 would be needed for a total of $130,000. We need to keep in  mind that this amount will increase when Emerald Ash Borer arrives in St. Louis Park. When it  does, the cost of removal could go from $130,000 to $400,000 using a 100% funding model.        Special Study Session Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: 2017 Budget Update Page 14 Reilly  QUESTION:  Is additional funding needed for Reilly and/or what can be done to mitigate and come  to resolution?    ANSWER: At this time, no additional funds are expected in the near future for administrative  efforts (beyond what’s already been requested in the budget). Once WTP4 & WTP6 are upgraded  (approximately 2018‐2020 timeframe), annual O&M costs are expected to rise $50‐$80K for each  plant due to the additional treatment technologies.  In addition, staff has been working with  Lockridge Grindall on amendments to the Consent Decree to mitigate the expense of  unnecessary but required testing.    Organics  QUESTION:  How are we going to move ahead with Organics to incent or provide for all residents?  ANSWER: Staff will present options for moving forward to encourage and increase organics  participation this fall of as part of our 2017 budget discussions.  This will include how to incent to  gain more participation with organics, and communication and education plans.    Sidewalk Snowplowing  QUESTION: What would it cost to plow all city sidewalks using seasonal staff, contracting, use of  overtime and what is our current cost for sidewalk plowing?  ANSWER:   What is the cost using part‐time/seasonal staff?    - Five additional sidewalk routes would be required to clear the “residential” sidewalk  segments.    - We anticipate each route would require approximately 500 labor hours for a total  of 2500 labor hours.    - An average seasonal employee rate is estimated at $25/hour, but may need to be  higher to attract competent operators willing to remain on standby.  At $25/hour,  the estimated annual labor cost would be $62,500.    - Similarly, five new sidewalk machines would need to be purchased at an estimated  up front cost of $750,000 ($150k each), or an eight‐year annualized cost of  $93,750/year.    - Therefore, estimated labor and equipment costs to clear the additional mileage via  seasonal/part‐time staff would be $62,500 + $93,750 or $156,250 per year.  - It is important to note that if worked over 30 hours on a regular basis, cost for  healthcare would need to be added to the wage rate.  Additionally, the Local 49er  Union Contract has language that limits us in use of equipment by seasonal/part‐ time staff and restrictions on time worked.  Discussions would need to occur with  the union.       What is the cost for service (contractor) to do work?  Approximately $1.2M cost to cover  the resident‐maintained portion of the system only. The estimate was received directly  from a contractor already working within SLP two years ago.  Staff reached out to three  snow removal contractors already performing work for the city: One responded with the  above estimate and two others declined submitting an estimate stating they were not  interested in the work. The large upfront investment likely drove the contractor’s costs  Special Study Session Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: 2017 Budget Update Page 15 and the immediate availability of the contractor to perform the work with the  unpredictability of the snow events. Staff would need to do a request for proposal if an  option like this is chosen. This cost will increase in direct relation to the additional  segments built via the Connect the Park construction effort.       What is the cost for the city to plow all sidewalks assuming this would be done on  overtime?  Given the fact that when a snow event happens all maintenance staff are  involved and typically work 10‐12 hour shifts (including overtime), the current staff would  not be able to add the additional hours if the snow must be removed within 2 days.    An option would be to add 5 public service workers @ $80k = $400k plus the additional 5  sidewalk machines @ $150k each. The staffing estimate is based on the 60 miles  maintained by residents and the average length of our routes are 12 miles.      What is the current cost for what we do now for sidewalk snow removal?  For our current  routes, the cost is approximately $90‐$120K/year (staff and equipment) depending on the  year and the frequency/amount of responses requiring work on overtime.  Costs for snow  removal are only recorded as the time spent actually operating the snow removal  equipment and do not include any administrative or overhead costs.       How much would we save if we discontinued this for our sidewalks? The cost estimate  to do the current sidewalk removal is $90k‐120k/year depending on the season.  If we  discontinued plowing current sidewalks, the recommendation would be to maintain the  current level of staffing to cover other related maintenance activities.  Therefore the  savings would be in overtime related to sidewalk activities of $2k‐$10k (estimate  depending on snowfall amounts for the season).  The equipment savings would come  from the elimination of three out of the four sidewalk machines (approximately  $60K/year in annualized savings).  Staff would still anticipate keeping one machine in the  fleet inventory.      Here are some basic facts about our sidewalk system:   Current miles plowed by city staff:  48 miles   Number of current routes:  4   Average route length:  48/4 = 12 miles   Current miles cleared by residents:  60 miles  Other items to consider:   What is the problem or opportunity to be addressed?   Ability to attract/retain competent and reliable part‐time staff who would be expected  to work with an unpredictable schedule.   Physical width and condition of certain sidewalks in the community will make snow  removal difficult.   The city’s approach for removal on a mass basis will not provide for a bare pavement  result.   Concerns about meeting expectations given the above and other considerations.  Special Study Session Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: 2017 Budget Update Page 16 Meeting: Economic Development Authority Meeting Date: August 15, 2016 Minutes: 3a UNOFFICIAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA JULY 18, 2016 1. Call to Order President Mavity called the meeting to order at 7:20 p.m. Commissioners present: President Anne Mavity, Tim Brausen, Steve Hallfin, Gregg Lindberg, Thom Miller, Susan Sanger, and Jake Spano. Commissioners absent: None. Staff present: Executive Director (Mr. Harmening), City Attorney (Mr. Mattick), Economic Development Coordinator (Mr. Hunt), Community Development Director (Mr. Locke), Zoning Administrator (Mr. Morrison), and Recording Secretary (Ms. Pappas). 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes 3a. Economic Development Authority Meeting Minutes June 6, 2016 It was moved by Commissioner Brausen, seconded by Commissioner Spano, to approve the EDA minutes as presented. The motion passed 7-0. 3b. Economic Development Authority Meeting Minutes June 20, 2016 It was moved by Commissioner Brausen, seconded by Commissioner Spano, to approve the EDA minutes as presented. The motion passed 7-0. 4. Approval of Agenda It was moved by Commissioner Lindberg, seconded by Commissioner Brausen, to approve the EDA agenda as presented. The motion passed 7-0. 5. Reports 5a. Approval of EDA Disbursements Economic Development Authority Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 3a) Page 2 Title: Economic Development Authority Meeting Minutes of July 18, 2016 It was moved by Commissioner Brausen, seconded by Commissioner Spano, to approve the EDA Disbursements. The motion passed 7-0. 6. Old Business - None 7. New Business 7a. Issuance of TIF Revenue Note to Cedar Lake Rd Apartments LLC – Eliot Park Apartments. Resolution No. 16-17. Mr. Hunt presented the staff report. He stated the EDA and the City entered into a Contract for Private Redevelopment with Cedar Lake Road Apartments LLC on July 1, 2014, related to redevelopment of 6800 & 6720 Cedar Lake Road – the former Eliot School property and construction of the Eliot Park Apartments (now Siena Apartments). Under the Contract, the redeveloper agreed to construct two apartment buildings with 138 market rate units between them, as well as two single family homes. In order to make the project financially feasible, the EDA agreed to reimburse the redeveloper up to $1.1 million from tax increment generated by the project for qualified costs (such as environmental remediation, building demolition, site preparation and underground structured parking) incurred during the redevelopment of the former school property. This reimbursement was to be provided once certain conditions had been met. These conditions stated that a TIF Note would be issued when the redeveloper submitted to the EDA documentation that sufficient qualified public redevelopment costs were actually incurred by the redeveloper in connection with the project. Given that the redeveloper has met the required conditions for issuance of the TIF Note, the EDA is being asked to formally approve the issuance of the Note up to $1.1 million. Mr. Hunt added that staff and the EDA’s legal counsel recommended adoption of the proposed resolution. Commissioner Brausen asked if the increased tax revenue from the redevelopment will provide for the tax increment payments to the redeveloper. Mr. Hunt stated that is correct. Commissioner Brausen added that the property had to have a minimum assessed value of $17 million, and in fact the property is currently assessed at $24 million, noting that that should be more than enough of an increase in value to sustain payments under the note. Mr. Hunt stated that is correct. Commissioner Sanger asked about the two single-family homes at the property and questioned how the city can ensure the second single-family home will be built this year, and if there are other contractual requirements that must be met by the developer, requiring the building of the second home. Mr. Locke stated the redeveloper understands the obligations of the redevelopment contract; however, the contract is clear that once the redeveloper had submitted sufficient qualified costs, the EDA is obligated to issue the note. Mr. Hunt also indicated that if the second home is not constructed by the end of the year, the city would notify the redeveloper of the default under the contract. Economic Development Authority Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 3a) Page 3 Title: Economic Development Authority Meeting Minutes of July 18, 2016 Commission Sanger asked about the redeveloper acquiring the 18% rate of return on this project and stated usually there is only a 10% rate of return, adding this seems to be a very high rate of return. She asked Mr. Hunt for clarification. Mr. Hunt indicated that an internal rate of return of up to 18% is what is allowed in the Lookback section of the Contract and that is the same percentage expressed in other recent contracts as well. It was moved by Commissioner Brausen, seconded by Commissioner Spano, to waive the reading and adopt EDA Resolution No. 16-17, the EDA Resolution authorizing the Issuance of a Tax Increment Revenue Note, Series 2016 to Cedar Lake Road Apartments LLC. The motion passed 7-0. 8. Communications There were no communications 9. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 7:25 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, Secretary Anne Mavity, President Meeting: Economic Development Authority Meeting Date: August 15, 2016 Minutes: 3b UNOFFICIAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA AUGUST 1, 2016 1. Call to Order President Mavity called the meeting to order at 7:25 p.m. Commissioners present: President Anne Mavity, Tim Brausen, Steve Hallfin, Gregg Lindberg, Thom Miller, Susan Sanger, and Jake Spano. Commissioners absent: None. Staff present: Executive Director (Mr. Harmening), City Attorney (Mr. Mattick), Planning/Zoning Supervisor (Ms. McMonigal), Engineering Director (Ms. Heiser), and Recording Secretary (Ms. Pappas). 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes - None 4. Approval of Agenda It was moved by Commissioner Sanger, seconded by Commissioner Spano, to approve the EDA agenda as presented. The motion passed 7-0. 5. Reports 5a. Approval of EDA Disbursements It was moved by Commissioner Hallfin, seconded by Commissioner Lindberg, to approve the EDA Disbursements. The motion passed 7-0. 6. Old Business - None 7. New Business – None 8. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 7:28 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, Secretary President Meeting: Economic Development Authority Meeting Date: August 15, 2016 Action Agenda Item: 7a EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Subordination Agreement with PNC Bank – Cedar Lake Rd Apartments LLC RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt EDA Resolution approving the Subordination Agreement with PNC Bank, National Association relative to the Redevelopment Contract with Cedar Lake Road Apartments LLC. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the EDA find that the proposed Subordination Agreement with PNC Bank, National Association is in conformance with the Redevelopment Contract with Cedar Lake Road Apartments LLC and to be in the best interest of the city and its residents? SUMMARY: The EDA and City entered into a Contract for Private Redevelopment with Cedar Lake Road Apartments LLC on July 1, 2014 related to the redevelopment of 6800 & 6720 Cedar Lake Road (former Eliot School property) and construction of the Eliot Park Apartments (now Siena Apartments). Under the Contract, the Redeveloper agreed to construct two apartment buildings with 138 market rate units between them as well as two single family houses. In order to make the project financially feasible, the EDA agreed in the Contract to reimburse the Redeveloper up to $1,100,000 from tax increment generated by the project for qualified Public Redevelopment Costs associated with the redevelopment of the former school property. On July 18th, the EDA approved the issuance of a TIF Revenue Note up to $1,100,000 to Cedar Lake Road Apartments LLC. Soon thereafter the Redeveloper closed on its permanent financing for the project with PNC Bank, National Association. Under Section 7.2 of the Contract, the EDA agreed to subordinate its rights under the Contract to the holder of any mortgage securing construction or permanent financing, so long as the subordination is in substantially the form provided in the Contract. The Redeveloper has recently requested that the EDA subordinate its rights under the Contract to the bank providing the permanent financing for the completed Minimum Improvements. The proposed Subordination Agreement is in substantially the form that was included as an exhibit to the Contract and is similar to other subordination agreements the EDA has previously approved for other projects. The proposed Agreement has been reviewed by the EDA’s legal counsel who recommends its approval. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: All costs associated with the preparation of this Agreement (Kennedy & Graven) are to be paid by Cedar Lake Rd Apartments LLC. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not Applicable SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: EDA Resolution Subordination Agreement Prepared by: Greg Hunt, Economic Development Coordinator Reviewed by: Kevin Locke, Community Development Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, EDA Executive Director and City Manager Economic Development Authority Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 7a) Page 2 Title: Subordination Agreement with PNC Bank, National Association – Cedar Lake Rd Apartments LLC ST. LOUIS PARK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDA RESOLUTION NO. 16-____ RESOLUTION APPROVING A SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE AUTHORITY AND PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION BE IT RESOLVED By the Board of Commissioners ("Board") of the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority ("Authority") as follows: Section 1. Recitals. 1.01. The Authority is currently administering its Redevelopment Project No. 1 ("Project") pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047 ("HRA Act"), and within the Project has established the Eliot Park Tax Increment Financing District (“TIF District”). 1.02. The Authority and Cedar Lake Road Apartments LLC (the “Redeveloper”) entered into a Contract for Private Redevelopment dated as of July 1, 2014, as amended (the “Contract”), regarding redevelopment of a portion of the property within the TIF District by means of the construction, in relevant part, of certain multifamily rental housing (the “Minimum Improvements”). 1.03. The Redeveloper has completed construction of the Minimum Improvements pursuant to the Contract (with construction of the last single-family home pending), and the Authority has issued its Tax Increment Revenue Note, Series 2016 (Eliot Park Project), in the original principal amount of $1,100,000 to the Redeveloper (the “TIF Note”). In order to receive permanent financing for the Minimum Improvements, the Redeveloper’s mortgage lender, PNC Bank, National Association (the “Lender”) requires a collateral assignment of the Contract and TIF Note by the Redeveloper to the Lender and subordination of the Authority’s rights under the Contract with respect to the Minimum Improvements, as set forth in the subordination agreement presented to the Authority (the “Subordination”). 1.04. Section 7.2 of the Contract provides for subordination of the Authority’s rights under the Contract, so long as such subordination contains such reasonable terms and conditions as are mutually agreed by the Authority and Lender in writing. 1.05. The Board has reviewed the Subordination and finds that the approval and execution of the Subordination are in the best interest of the City and its residents. Section 2. Authority Approval; Other Proceedings. 2.01. The Subordination as presented to the Board is hereby in all respects approved, subject to modifications that do not alter the substance of the transaction and that are approved by the President and Executive Director, provided that execution of the Subordination by such officials shall be conclusive evidence of approval. Economic Development Authority Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 7a) Page 3 Title: Subordination Agreement with PNC Bank, National Association – Cedar Lake Rd Apartments LLC 2.02. The President and Executive Director are hereby authorized to execute on behalf of the Authority the Subordination and any other documents requiring execution by the Authority in order to carry out the transaction described in the Subordination. 2.03. Authority staff and consultants are authorized to take any actions necessary to carry out the intent of this resolution. Approved by the Board of Commissioners of the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority this 15th day of August, 2016. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the Economic Development Authority August 15, 2016 Thomas K. Harmening, Executive Director Anne Mavity, President Attest Secretary Economic Development Authority Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 7a) Page 4 Title: Subordination Agreement with PNC Bank, National Association – Cedar Lake Rd Apartments LLC Siena Apartment Homes SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT THIS SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") is made as of this 29th day of July, 2016, between PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a national banking association (the "Lender"), whose address is at 26901 Agoura Road, Suite 200, Calabasas Hills, California 91301, Attention: Loan Servicing Manager, and the ST. LOUIS PARK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, a public body corporate and politic ("Authority"), whose address is 5005 Minnetonka Boulevard, St. Louis Park, Minnesota, 55416. RECITALS A. Cedar Lake Road Apartments LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (the "Redeveloper"), is the owner of certain real property situated in Hennepin County, Minnesota and legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein (the "Property"). B. Lender has made a mortgage loan to Redeveloper in the original principal amount of $18,180,000.00 (the "Loan"). The Loan is the evidenced and secured by the following documents: (i) a certain promissory note (the "Note") made by Redeveloper dated July 25, 2016, in the amount of $18,180,000.00; and (ii) a certain Multifamily Mortgage, Assignment of Leases and Resents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing (the "Mortgage") made by Redeveloper dated as of July 29, 2016, filed ______________, 2016, as Hennepin County Recorder/Registrar of Titles Doc. No. ___________________ encumbering the Property. The Note, the Mortgage and all other documents and instruments evidencing, securing and executed in connection with the Loan, are hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Loan Documents." C. Authority is the owner and holder of certain rights under a certain Contract for Private Redevelopment, dated as of July 1, 2014 (the "Contract"), by and between Redeveloper and Authority. D. Pursuant to the Contract, the Redeveloper has received the Authority’s Tax Increment Revenue Note, Series 2016 (Eliot Park Project) in the original principal amount of $1,100,000.00 (the "TIF Note"), which TIF Note shall be collaterally assigned to Lender. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and as an inducement to Lender le make the Loan, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto represent, warrant and agree as follows: Economic Development Authority Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 7a) Page 5 Title: Subordination Agreement with PNC Bank, National Association – Cedar Lake Rd Apartments LLC 1. Consent. The Authority acknowledges that the Lender is making the Loan to the Redeveloper and consents to the same. The Authority also consents to and approves the collateral assignment of the Contract and TIF Note by the Redeveloper to the Lender as collateral for the Loan; provided, however, that this consent shall not deprive the Authority of or otherwise limit any of the Authority's rights or remedies under the Contract and TIF Note and shall not relieve the Redeveloper of any of its obligations under the Contract and TIF Note; provided further, however, the limitations to the Authority's consent contained in this Paragraph 1 are subject to the provisions of Paragraph 2 below. 2. Subordination. The Authority hereby agrees that the rights of the Authority under the Contract are and shall remain subordinate and subject to liens, rights and security interests created by the Loan Documents and to any and all amendments, modifications, extensions, replacements or renewals of the Loan Documents; provided, however, that nothing herein shall be construed as subordinating (a) the requirement contained in the Contract that the Property be used in accordance with the provisions of Section 10.3 of the Contract, (b) the Authority's rights under the TIF Note to suspend payments in accordance with the TIF Note, and (c) the Authority's rights under the Assessment Agreement referenced in Section 6.3 of the Contract. 3. Notice to Authority. Lender agrees to use commercially reasonable efforts to notify Authority of the occurrence of any Event of Default given to Redeveloper under the Loan Documents, in accordance with Section 7.1(c) of the Contract. The Lender shall not be bound by the other requirements in the Contract. 4. Statutory Exception. Nothing in this Agreement shall alter, remove or affect Redeveloper's obligation under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.029 to use the Property in conformity to Section 10.3 of the Contract. 5. No Assumption. The Authority acknowledges that the Lender is not a party to the Contract and by executing this Agreement does not become a party to the Contract, and specifically does not assume and shall not be bound by any obligations of the Redeveloper to the Authority under the Contract, and that the Lender shall incur no obligations whatsoever to the Authority except as expressly provided herein. 6. Notice from Authority. So long as the Contract remains in effect, the Authority agrees to give to the Lender copies of notices of any Event of Default given to Redeveloper under the Contract. 7. Governing Law. This Agreement is made in and shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. 8. Successors. This Agreement and each and every covenant, agreement and other provision hereof shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns, including any person who acquires title to the Property through the Lender of a foreclosure of the Mortgage. 9. Severability. The unenforceability or invalidity of any provision hereof shall not render any other provision or provisions herein contained unenforceable or invalid. Economic Development Authority Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 7a) Page 6 Title: Subordination Agreement with PNC Bank, National Association – Cedar Lake Rd Apartments LLC 10. Notice. Any notices and other communications permitted or required by the provisions of this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been properly given or served by depositing the same with the United States Postal Service, or any official successor thereto, designated as registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, bearing adequate postage, or delivery by reputable private carrier and addresses as set forth above. 11. Transfer of Title to Lender. The Authority agrees that in the event the Lender, a transferee of Lender, or a purchaser at foreclosure sale, acquires title to the Property pursuant to a foreclosure, or a deed in lieu thereof, the Lender, transferee, or purchaser shall not be bound by the terms and conditions of the Contract except as expressly herein provided. Further the Authority agrees that in the event the Lender, a transferee of Lender, or a purchaser at foreclosure sale acquires title to the Property pursuant to a foreclosure sale or a deed in lieu thereof, then the Lender, transferee, or purchaser shall be entitled to all rights conferred upon the Redeveloper under the Contract, provided that no condition of default exists and remains uncured beyond applicable cure periods in the obligations of the Redeveloper under the Contract. 12. Estoppel. The Authority hereby represents and warrants to Lender, for the purpose of inducing Lender to make advances to Redeveloper under the Loan Documents that: (a) No default or event of default by Redeveloper exists under the terms of the Contract on the date hereof; (b) The Contract has not been amended or modified in any respect, nor has any material provision thereof been waived by either the Authority or the Redeveloper, and the Contract is in full force and effect; (c) Such other reasonable certifications as the Lender may request. 13. Amendments. The Authority hereby represents and warrants to Lender for the purpose of inducing Lender to make advances to Redeveloper under the Loan Documents that Authority will not agree to any amendment or modification to the or any TIF Note issued under the Contract that materially affects the collection of Available Tax Increment (as defined in the Contract) in any way affects the Property without the Lender's written consent. Economic Development Authority Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 7a) Page 7 Title: Subordination Agreement with PNC Bank, National Association – Cedar Lake Rd Apartments LLC IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed and delivered as of the day and year first written above. ST. LOUIS PARK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY By _______________________________________ Its President By _______________________________________ Its Executive Director STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ________________ day of August, 2016, by Anne Mavity, the President of the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority, a public body corporate and politic, on behalf of such public body. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _________________ day of August, 2016, by Thomas K. Harmening, the Executive Director of the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority, a public body corporate and politic, on behalf of such public body. Notary Public Economic Development Authority Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 7a) Page 8 Title: Subordination Agreement with PNC Bank, National Association – Cedar Lake Rd Apartments LLC LENDER PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a national banking association By: _______________________________________ Joe Basurto Senior Vice President ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of County of On ______________________ before me, _________________________________________ , (Insert Name and Title of the Officer) personally appeared Joe Basurto, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature __________________________________________________________(Seal) A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. Economic Development Authority Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 7a) Page 9 Title: Subordination Agreement with PNC Bank, National Association – Cedar Lake Rd Apartments LLC Exhibit A of Subordination Agreement PROPERTY Parcel 1: That part of Lot 1, Block 1, Eliot Park Apartments embraced within Lots 10, 25 and 27, Richmond 3rd Addition Hennepin County, Minnesota Torrens Property Certificate of Title No. 1416695 Parcel 2: Lot 1, Block 1, and Outlot A, Eliot Park Apartments, except that part of said Lot 1 embraced within Lots 10, 25 and 27, Richmond 3rd Addition Hennepin County, Minnesota Abstract Property Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: August 15, 2016 Presentation: 2a EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Westwood Hills Nature Center Junior Naturalists Recognition RECOMMENDED ACTION: The Mayor is asked to thank the Junior Naturalists for their service this summer, and introduce Westwood Hills Nature Center Activity Specialist Will Huyck, who will provide background and current information on the summer program. (Becky McConnell, Naturalist, will be the regular staff person attending.) The Mayor is then asked to recognize each of the Junior Naturalists. POLICY CONSIDERATION: None at this time. SUMMARY: There are 56 youth volunteers involved in the Junior Naturalist program. By the end of summer, they will have volunteered over 1,600 hours. Several of these volunteers have been involved for seven years, and the program has been part of Westwood Hills Nature Center for 26 years. Junior Naturalists are students entering 7th grade through incoming college freshmen who are interested in serving their community while gaining knowledge and experience in the outdoors. There are five areas that they can be involved in: Animal Care: Junior Naturalists feed, care for, handle, and educate the public about Westwood’s display and programming animals. Program Aide: Junior Naturalists assist staff members with supervising and running Westwood’s various summer camps and children’s programs. Wild Hikes: Junior Naturalists hike Westwood’s trails, identify various organisms, and learn alongside a staff Naturalist. They then apply their knowledge to other project areas. Behind the Scenes: Junior Naturalists maintain Westwood’s birdfeeders, participate in a citizen science project and complete various small projects around the center. Water Garden: Junior Naturalists maintain and monitor Westwood’s new water garden for public use. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged community. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: None Prepared by: Stacy M. Voelker, Senior Office Assistant Mark Oestreich, Westwood Hills Nature Center Manager Reviewed by: Cynthia S. Walsh, Director of Operations and Recreation Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: August 15, 2016 Presentation: 2b EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Recognition of Donations RECOMMENDED ACTION: Mayor to announce and express thanks and appreciation for the following donations being accepted at the meeting and listed on the Consent Agenda: From Amount For Jeanne and Steve Prawer $2,200 A bench at Westwood Hills Nature Center in appreciation of the natural beauty at the Nature Center. Prepared by: Debbie Fischer, Administrative Services Office Assistant Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: August 15, 2016 Minutes: 3a UNOFFICIAL MINUTES CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL STUDY SESSION ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA JULY 18, 2016 The meeting convened at 6:45 p.m. Councilmembers present: Mayor Jake Spano, Tim Brausen, Steve Hallfin, Gregg Lindberg, Anne Mavity, Thom Miller, and Susan Sanger. Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), Engineering Director (Ms. Heiser), City Attorney (Mr. Mattick), and Recording Secretary (Ms. Pappas). Guest: None 1. Xcel and CenterPoint Franchise Agreement Renewal Ms. Heiser explained that this discussion is to inform the City Council of the status of discussions related to the renewal of the franchise agreements with CenterPoint Energy and Xcel Energy. The city has been working on renewing the franchise agreements since 2013 and has approved two extensions - one in 2012 and one in 2015. The latest extension is set to expire on December 31, 2016. Staff has been in contact with both utilities regarding the upcoming deadline, and there is mutual interest in working on the new agreement. The approval for these agreements through the City Council and Public Utilities Commission takes approximately five months. The City Attorney has been involved in the renewal agreement discussions and has reviewed and commented on the proposed agreement. The two companies have reviewed all comments on the draft agreement. The permit fees issue has been resolved, as has the performance bond language. The one outstanding issue is related to the franchise term. Xcel has proposed a franchise agreement term of 20 years, but the city has asked for a 10-year term. City staff states 10 years is reasonable, given anticipated significant changes in technology and energy production methods in the future. Xcel is not supportive of this position. It was noted that budget considerations involve the city’s pavement management program, which is currently funded by franchise fee revenues collected from both Xcel and CenterPoint Energy. Total franchise fees generate $2.3 million annually, and the city is not able to receive these revenues without a franchise agreement with each utility. Councilmember Brausen asked if the utilities do not agree to a franchise agreement, if the city would force them to request a permit each time they had a project. Ms. Heiser noted with or without the agreement, they are required to obtain a permit to do work in the city right-of-way. Councilmember Sanger asked what the pros and cons were of a 10-year versus a 20-year agreement. She questioned if there are consequences to not having the same number of years with both utilities and if the city has any leverage to negotiate the franchise term. Mr. Mattick stated the term agreements will be the same for both utilities. When negotiating, the Xcel agreement is done first, as that is the most difficult, and then the rest of the agreements usually City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 3a) Page 2 Title: Special Study Session Minutes of July 18, 2016 fall into place. He added the city prefers the 10-year agreement, with the option for two 5-year renewals. Mr. Mattick added the city does not have any leverage on this issue. Councilmember Mavity asked what the parameters are related to raising city permit fees to allow for a shorter term agreement. Mr. Mattick stated permits and fees cover costs, but do not generate revenue like the franchise fees do. Councilmember Lindberg asked if franchise agreements have any benefits other than the collection of fees. Ms. Heiser stated the franchise agreements provide a revenue source for the city, but also provide a process for addressing service reliability concerns. Mr. Mattick noted the most important part of the agreement is the revenue that is generated. Councilmember Lindberg asked if there is a way to utilize alternative energy sources, as it becomes more prevalent, since the city has no leverage and no other options. Ms. Heiser referenced the City’s Partners in Energy efforts that the Environment and Sustainability Commission is working on. This will result in a Memorandum of Understanding regarding the city’s climate action goals Ms. Heiser stated staff will come back to the council with the new ordinance. The public hearing will be held on September 6. 2. Assessment Policy Ms. Heiser explained this report is a continuation in the process of updating the city’s assessment policies. She noted the city’s assessment policy was last updated in 2000. Prior to that, the policy was updated more frequently. She pointed out that a draft assessment policy has been reviewed by the City Attorney and reflects the input received from council over the last eight months. Mr. Harmening noted the policy will assess for parking lots and fire sprinkler requests. Ms. Heiser added there has been a robust review of all policies, and there will be information coming forth on city code updates also. Councilmember Sanger asked Mr. Mattick if this assessment policy is a matter of state statute; if it reflects how long a debt can be deferred; and if the deferrals are part of state statute. Mr. Mattick stated it is up to the city how to handle this and that the city council can set up a definition of a trigger mechanism for how to handle deferrals. Councilmember Sanger added then that possibly the city doesn’t need a deferral policy. Mr. Mattick agreed. Councilmember Mavity asked if there is specific language that can be removed and from what section. Mr. Mattick stated Section V of the policy can be removed. Councilmember Brausen stated if a deferral process is in place, it would allow someone in hardship to defer fees that might be owed. Councilmember Sanger stated she does not want to be in the business of deciding who is or is not in hardship. Councilmember Mavity asked if there are other tools to help folks pay for assessments. Mr. Harmening stated that other tools are available. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 3a) Page 3 Title: Special Study Session Minutes of July 18, 2016 Mr. Mattick pointed out this is a city policy, so the council can deviate on this issue if they gain a consensus. It was the consensus of the city council to remove Section V related to deferred assessments, from the policy draft. Councilmember Brausen said the council will need to do robust communication to citizens on the assessment policy as it moves to finalization. The meeting adjourned at 7:11 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Jake Spano, Mayor Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: August 15, 2016 Minutes: 3b UNOFFICIAL MINUTES CITY COUNCIL MEETING ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA JULY 18, 2016 1. Call to Order Mayor Spano called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. Councilmembers present: Mayor Jake Spano, Tim Brausen, Steve Hallfin, Gregg Lindberg, Anne Mavity, Thom Miller, and Susan Sanger. Councilmembers absent: None. Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), City Attorney (Mr. Mattick), Engineering Director (Ms. Heiser), Assistant Zoning Administrator (Mr. Morrison), Recreation Superintendent (Mr. West), Planner (Ms. Monson), and Recording Secretary (Ms. Pappas). Guests: Students of Junior Leader in the Park Program and Ms. Cocharan, Perspectives. 1a. Pledge of Allegiance 1b. Roll Call 2. Presentations 2a. Playground Junior Leader Recognition Jason West, Matt Terry, and Katie Lee recognized the Junior Leaders of the St. Louis Park playground program, and thanked the Mayor and City Council for their support. They noted the Junior Leaders had donated over 1300 hours of service to the community as playground leaders and stated that they are emerging leaders and role models for their peers. Mayor Spano thanked each Junior Leader and presented each with a certificate of recognition. Mayor Spano shared that his own children have been in this program in the past. He praised the program and noted he had even received a phone call about the program from a friend who had heard about it. He added this program helps to keep kids active, and the Junior Leaders set a great example for their peers. Councilmember Hallfin stated his son was also a part of this program, adding this is a spring board for community service. He thanked all of the Junior Leaders for their work. 3. Approval of Minutes 3a. City Council Special Study Session Minutes June 6, 2016 Councilmember Sanger requested a change on page four, three paragraphs down, to instead read: Councilmember Sanger questioned whether the new revised project works even if all the recommended traffic steps are done. Also, the portion related to Mr. Sullivan’s comments should read: Mr. Sullivan stated there would be improvements to the 36th Street turn in. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 3b) Page 2 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of July 18, 2016 It was moved by Councilmember Brausen and seconded by Councilmember Lindberg to approve the June 6, 2016 Special Study Session Meeting Minutes with the above changes. The motion passed 7-0. 3b. City Council Minutes June 6, 2016 It was moved by Councilmember Miller and seconded by Councilmember Hallfin to approve the June 6, 2016 Meeting Minutes as presented. The motion passed 7-0. 3c. Study Session Meeting Minutes June 13, 2016 It was moved by Councilmember Miller and seconded by Councilmember Brausen to approve the June 13, 2016 Study Session Meeting Minutes as presented. The motion passed 7-0. 3d. Special Study Session Meeting Minutes June 20, 2016 It was moved by Councilmember Brausen and seconded by Councilmember Miller to approve the June 20, 2016 Special Study Session Meeting Minutes as presented. The motion passed 7-0. 3e. City Council Meeting Minutes June 20, 2016 Councilmember Brausen noted a change in the communications section related to a comment he made congratulating the members of Parktacular on their success, and added: he thanked all committee workers, volunteers and community members, whose hard work made it a great event. Councilmember Sanger noted a change on the bottom of page 6 and the top of page 7, related to a statement made by Councilmember Mavity about: “affordable housing” and “those people”. Councilmember Sanger stated that she did not make these comments, which are derogatory and she asked for these comments to be stricken from the minutes. She asked Councilmember Mavity to apologize for the comments. Mayor Spano asked Councilmember Mavity to clarify her comments, and if they were not made, that they be stricken from the minutes. Councilmember Mavity stated the record should reflect what happened at the meeting. She stated Councilmember Sanger is correct, she did not say the words “those people” at the meeting. Councilmember Mavity went on to say that when she was speaking, she was responding to the tenor of the remarks made, and that phrasing should not be construed to be what Councilmember Sanger said. She added Councilmember Sanger is correct, the words “those people” were not uttered, and she stands by the tenor of the statements. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 3b) Page 3 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of July 18, 2016 Councilmember Sanger added that she and Councilmember Mavity are entitled to disagree on the policy matters, adding that the comments she made were not about the people who live there. The comments were about the issue of maintenance of the buildings that have dense populations of lower income people, which is a reflection on the management of the complex and not on the particular individuals who live there. Councilmember Sanger requested the last sentence on page 6 and the first sentence on page 7 be stricken from the minutes. Councilmember Mavity stated for the record, she has no opinion on this. She added if Councilmember Sanger wished and the council agreed, she would say after the comma of developer, but that the previous part of the statement stands, and delete “as some are calling “affordable housing” and “those people” … Councilmember Sanger agreed, and suggested in the next sentence to say: Councilmember Mavity stated that these residents are those who cared for her kids…. It was moved by Councilmember Miller and seconded by Councilmember Brausen to approve the June 20, 2016 City Council Meeting Minutes with the proposed changes as indicated above. The motion passed 7-0. 3f. Special City Council Meeting Minutes June 27, 2016 It was moved by Councilmember Miller and seconded by Councilmember Brausen to approve the June 20, 2016 Special Study Session Meeting Minutes as presented. The motion passed 7-0. 4. Approval of Agenda and Items on Consent Calendar 4a. Accept for filing City Disbursement Claims for the period of May 28 through July 8, 2016. 4b. Adopt Resolution No. 16-082 authorizing the elimination of permit parking restrictions in front of 3026 Salem Avenue South, 3212 Dakota Avenue South, and 4212 Wooddale Avenue. 4c. Adopt Resolution No. 16-083 authorizing the special assessment for the repair of the sewer service line at 3032 Maryland Avenue South, St. Louis Park, MN. P.I.D. 17-117- 21-21-0046. 4d. Adopt Resolution No. 16-084 authorizing the special assessment for the repair of the water service line at 3220 Edgewood Avenue South, St. Louis Park, MN. P.I.D. 17-117- 21-14-0034. 4e. Adopt Resolution No. 16-085 authorizing the special assessment for the repair of the sewer service line at 1401 Kentucky Avenue South, St. Louis Park, MN. P.I.D. 05-117- 21-42-0096. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 3b) Page 4 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of July 18, 2016 4f. Adopt Resolution No. 16-086 accepting work and authorizing final payment in the amount of $10,460.46 for the Sanitary Sewer Lift Station Project with Minger Construction, Inc. - Project No. 4014-3000, City Contract No. 82-14. 4g. Approve a temporary extension of the licensed premises for a one-day event at Steel Toe Brewing, LLC, located at 4848 35th Street West. 4h. Moved to 8c. 4i. Adopt Resolution No. 16-087 accepting work and authorizing final payment in the amount of $32,909.95 for the Traffic Signal Project - W. 36th Street at Wooddale and Xenwood Avenue with Thomas & Sons Construction, Inc., Project No. 4014-1300, Contract No. 35-15. 4j. Adopt Resolution No. 16-088 reauthorizing membership in the 4M Fund in order to allow the investment of the 2016 Bond proceeds. 4k. Adopt Resolution No. 16-089 appointing IT Manager, Jason Huber, as an Alternate to the LOGIS Board of Directors. 4l. Approve for filing Board of Zoning Appeals Meeting Minutes of March 24, 2016 4m. Approve for filing Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of May 18, 2016 Councilmember Brausen requested that Consent Calendar item 4h be removed and placed on the Regular Agenda to 8c. It was moved by Councilmember Brausen, seconded by Councilmember Miller, to approve the Agenda and items listed on the Consent Calendar as amended, and to move Consent Calendar item 4H to the Regular Agenda as item 8C; and to waive reading of all resolutions and ordinances. The motion passed 7-0. 5. Boards and Commissions - None 6. Public Hearings - None 7. Requests, Petitions, and Communications from the Public – None 8. Resolutions, Ordinances, Motions and Discussion Items 8a. Conditional Use Permit – Parking Lot for Perspectives, Inc. Mr. Morrison presented the staff report. He noted the applicant is in the process of planning an expansion of their facility located at 3381 Gorham Avenue. The expansion will require additional parking, which cannot be constructed on their site as the property is too small to accommodate both the addition and the required parking. The applicant has purchased the property at 7008 Walker Street, and constructed a new parking lot, with the intent of providing a minimum number of parking spaces required for the expansion. The new lot is a permitted use and does not require council action for its construction; however, a CUP City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 3b) Page 5 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of July 18, 2016 is required to allow them to locate 39 required parking spaces off-site. If approved, the CUP will require an irrevocable off-site parking agreement that encumbers the new parking lot located at 7008 Walker Street for use. Future owners of the parking lot and facility will be bound by the CUP and parking agreements. Approval of the CUP will enable the applicant to proceed with fundraising and planning for the facility expansion. The planning commission recommended approval, and no comments were received at the public hearing on June 15, 2016. Councilmember Lindberg asked why this much parking is required. He commented that he will support this; however, he has concerns when hearing this is an irrevocable agreement. Mr. Morrison stated that Perspectives is in need of the additional parking and is currently fundraising for this project. Councilmember Brausen asked if there was a way to create a CUP that is reviewable in the future, as he also is uncomfortable giving irrevocable property right on the parking lot. Mr. Morrison stated the council can add a condition to review the CUP if they would prefer, and added that all of the parking spaces will be used. It was moved by Councilmember Lindberg, seconded by Councilmember Mavity, to approve the Conditional Use Permit to locate 39 parking spaces required for Perspectives Inc. to a parking lot located at 7008 Walker Street with conditions as recommended by staff. The motion passed 7-0. 8b. First Reading of a Zoning Ordinance Amendment – Floodplain Districts Ms. Monson presented the staff report. She noted St Louis Park requires compensatory flood storage for all projects within the floodplain district overlay, where development occurs in the floodplain in order to avoid any increase in flood storage. Historically, the city has required compensatory flood storage be constructed outside the existing floodway, which is unique. Federal, state, and watershed districts do not require this provision in managing the floodplain. The proposed amendment would allow required compensatory storage to be constructed within the existing floodplain, following the natural water patterns in the area. Ms. Monson added the city recently approved a variance allowing compensatory storage to be located within the existing floodplain at Methodist Hospital. There are additional projects this rule would impact, including Meadowbrook Golf Course restoration and city bridge replacement projects, such as the West 37th Street bridge and the Louisiana Avenue bridge. The rule would also impact all future bridge replacements across Minnehaha Creek. In order to avoid future variance requests of a similar nature, city staff advises updating the city’s zoning ordinance to allow compensatory storage both inside and outside the existing floodplain. Councilmember Hallfin stated that obviously a previous city council thought this language was needed and asked about the logic in having this extra level of protection in the floodplain. He also asked when it was put into the ordinance. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 3b) Page 6 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of July 18, 2016 Ms. Monson stated she could not find a specific reason why the language had previously been included, but added they are currently pursuing the FEMA model in order to get points for percentage discounts. Mr. Elkin stated the language had been in the ordinance since 1976. Councilmember Hallfin stated he is fine approving this but would like some history, especially since the council is looking to reverse something a previous council did. He would like this to be taken into account. Councilmember Sanger stated the proposal seems to make sense but asked if a future developer comes in and wants to put storage within the floodplain, what steps should be taken to ensure that this will not exacerbate the current flooding occurring in the floodplain. Ms. Heiser noted that studies would be done to make sure the flood spread is matched. This will need to be maintained and the original proposal will need to be met. Councilmember Sanger asked if by digging additional compensatory storage, the city can at least make sure flooding won’t get any worse. Ms. Heiser stated yes, and if a certain amount is filled in, they must dig out the same amount. Councilmember Miller asked about compensatory storage outside of the floodplain. If it allows for an incident even greater than a 100-year flood, would it then not contribute to flooding in the floodplain? Ms. Heiser stated that as the ordinance stands, the city would have to build compensatory storage outside of the floodplain and would have to go outside of the actual floodplain location in order to compensate for this. She added this land might not be contiguous but would be in the same watershed. This is a way for the city to create equity. It is a way for the city to monitor it and not cause a staging increase. Councilmember Brausen stated he is in favor of this ordinance and noted the public hearing was June 15, 2016, at the Planning Commission; however, the first reading should be stated as having been July 18, 2016, so he would like to amend the ordinance to reflect this. It was moved by Councilmember Brausen, seconded by Councilmember Lindberg, to approve First Reading of an Ordinance amending Division 10. Floodplain Districts Section 36-292(f) of the City Code to allow compensatory flood storage be provided using accepted engineering practices to achieve the goal of eliminating any increase in flood stage as a result of a project, and to set the second reading for August 1, 2016. The motion passed 7-0. 8c. Approve a Temporary On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for the Minnesota Grape Growers Association at 1621 West End Blvd. for August 6, 2016. Councilmember Brausen noted he is a member of the MN Grape Growers Association, and would abstain from the motion and vote. It was moved by Councilmember Lindberg, seconded by Councilmember Mavity, to approve a temporary on-sale intoxicating liquor license for the Minnesota Grape Growers Association at 1621 West End Blvd. for August 6, 2016. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 3b) Page 7 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of July 18, 2016 The motion passed 6-0-1 (Brausen abstained). Councilmember Brausen invited all the residents to come to the West End on August 6, 2016, to sample Minnesota wines at this good event. 9. Communications Mr. Harmening stated the Minnehaha Creek clean up event is this weekend on July 24, and to RSVP at the Minnehaha Creek Website. On July 27, there is a community education session at the MSC at 6 p.m. regarding the Riley Superfund site. August 2 is National Night Out, and he encouraged citizens to sponsor a neighborhood party and invite people to attend. He added that folks can contact the Police Department for details or to sign up. Councilmember Brausen noted that Texas Avenue, between Wayzata Boulevard and Cedar Lake Road, has been reconfigured. He asked everyone to be patient during these changes in the new routes with bicycle lanes, pedestrian and car traffic. He noted with the Hwy. 100 construction scheduled to be completed in 94 days, traffic will flow easier and more safely. He thanked staff for work done on Texas Avenue, including all of the landscaping and sidewalks. He also thanked all residents along Texas Avenue for their patience during this process and for their support either by using the new sidewalks, bike lanes, and/or by watering of trees. He noted that this is what makes St. Louis Park a great community - working, recreating and living together. Councilmember Miller noted the Birchwood Neighborhood has a summer picnic on July 20 with a live band, refreshments and food. Councilmember Lindberg added on July 20 at 5:30 p.m. there will be an open house on the Texas Avenue reconstruction project, which he and several staff members will attend. He is looking forward to comments on bike lanes during this open house. Also, on August 3 in Ward 3, he will be hosting an informal conversation at 6 p.m. at Oak Hill Park. Councilmember Brausen noted on July 19, there will be a Cedar Lake Road bikeway study meeting at St. Louis Park Middle School. Mayor Spano thanked city staff for their email updates on all road construction projects and asked folks to please forward any email updates from the city to their neighbors. 10. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 8:15 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Jake Spano, Mayor Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: August 15, 2016 Minutes: 3c UNOFFICIAL MINUTES CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL STUDY SESSION ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA AUGUST 1, 2016 The meeting convened at 6:15 p.m. Councilmembers present: Mayor Jake Spano, Tim Brausen, Steve Hallfin, Gregg Lindberg, Anne Mavity, Thom Miller, and Susan Sanger. Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), Engineering Director (Ms. Heiser), Director of Community Development (Mr. Locke), Planning/Zoning Supervisor (Ms. McMonigal) and Recording Secretary (Ms. Pappas). Guest: Rebecca Ryan, Next Generation Consulting (by WebEx). 1. Consulting Services for Vision/Comprehensive Plan Rebecca Ryan, Next Generations Consulting, presented ideas and a proposed approach for the visioning and comprehensive plan. Ms. Ryan is the second consultant to present to the council. Discussion involved Ms. Ryan’s experience, methods, outcomes, community engagement techniques, availability and other council expectations. Ms. McMonigal explained that the ultimate intent is to bring forward a recommended consultant for council approval at the August 15 council meeting. A refined and more detailed visioning process/scope of work will be prepared once the consultant is chosen. It is expected the consultant chosen by the council will begin in September. Ms. Ryan pointed out two major areas in her proposal that will be of the most importance. These two areas are to include the broadest possible cross section of community input, and to forecast and utilize the trends that may influence St. Louis Park over the next 10 years. She noted she will figure out the strategies to reach people, and the difficult-to-reach populations within the city. Additionally, forecasting will include working with a steering committee to consider trends and the effects these trends will have on coming generations. Ms. Ryan added she had reviewed the last two comprehensive plans produced by St. Louis Park and stated they had done a remarkable job of getting input and creating a living, breathing document. She complimented the city on its foresight, innovation and timeliness with the West End development, noting she wants to help develop visions and trends such as this with the visioning process. Ms. Ryan commented on the idea of community engagement with students, children, faith communities, neighborhood organizations, and businesses. She added they will use “one wish chalkboards” as a way to bring out creativity in community members, while building on strengths. Mr. Harmening noted that in the past the visioning process utilized a steering committee, and this group went through the entire process with staff and the consultant. He asked if this strategy might be used. Ms. Ryan stated that it can be done any way staff and the council prefer. Staff and the council could either appoint the steering committee members or use a process to allow community City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 3c) Page 2 Title: Special Study Session Minutes of August 1, 2016 members to volunteer to be on the committee, and then the council would make the final decision as to who becomes a member. Ms. Ryan added the steering committee can become the first responder group; help the consultant avoid errors; and assure the consultant reaches all the different communities represented in St. Louis Park. She stated the steering committee also helps the consultant think through how the community sees trends. Councilmember Hallfin stated the Jewish community is a group that has many different subsets within the whole of St. Louis Park, including Orthodox, Reformed and Conservative groups, each with their own synagogues. He noted this will be an important group to reach. Ms. Ryan agreed and stated there would need to be more strategies to reach each subset and the complex patchwork of this group within the community. Councilmember Mavity asked Ms. Ryan what she would envision as the right size for the steering committee, noting this group could get large quickly and go astray. She asked Ms. Ryan how she might manage folks that want to drive their own agenda through the visioning process. Ms. Ryan agreed those who go astray would not be a good fit on the steering committee. She noted this group will need to be on task and will have homework and projects. They will need to have shared values and goals, and be about inclusion and transparency. She added that every voice will matter, and she would also be available to facilitate the steering committee if needed. Ms. Ryan continued, stating the steering committee can have between 9 to 25 people, depending on what the council decides. Councilmember Lindberg stated he likes the idea of the core steering committee. He asked how many people would provide feedback and data to the steering committee and what success would look like in this process. Ms. Ryan stated the purpose of the steering committee and the visioning process will be to make sure everyone has a voice. She described a project she conducted in the city of Eagan, where one question per week was added to the city’s Facebook page. She stated they received 800 answers per week and noted this process could also be done for St. Louis Park. She added that sometimes the open town halls do not attract many people, and the social media and online participation can generate more interest. Councilmember Lindberg asked how transparency is shown. Ms. Ryan stated they will want to be as transparent as possible, and when the project is completed, to make it available to the public with all hard copy and data. Councilmember Sanger stated St. Louis Park has a very large senior population, adding that many are not on Facebook or other social media. She stated she hopes Ms. Ryan won’t rely too much on social media for outreach. Councilmember Sanger asked what Ms. Ryan sees as the role for the council, or for commissions, boards, and neighborhood groups in St. Louis Park. Ms. Ryan stated it is up to the council as to what their role will be, adding council members may want to be on the steering committee or may want to appoint people to the steering committee. She also noted examples in Minnetonka and Willmar. Ms. Ryan noted she is working with multiple cities in Minnesota on their visioning processes for the comprehensive plan. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 3c) Page 3 Title: Special Study Session Minutes of August 1, 2016 Ms. Ryan stated the neighborhood associations in St. Louis Park might be one of the best sources in gathering broad input. She added neighborhood groups could become a small army of volunteers, using workshops in a kit and working with leadership to host house parties. Councilmember Miller stated he enjoyed tonight’s approach, thought it was engaging, and added Ms. Ryan’s group could be a great fit for St. Louis Park. He stated her approach is simple and clear with good, common sense. Councilmember Brausen stated he liked Ms. Ryan’s simple approach and clear goals. He asked who does the forecasting. Ms. Ryan stated Charlie Grantham on her staff is a futurist who works with the steering committee to help them sort through trends and how they impact the future. He also presents projections and data from the Metropolitan Council, and wherever possible uses secondary sources of data for forecasting and projections to help zero in on future trends. Councilmember Brausen asked about the diversity of Ms. Ryan’s staff. Ms. Ryan noted that several people on her staff are people of color. Councilmember Mavity stated it might be very important that the city use local talent, also, noting this was reviewed in recent race equity workshops in which the city has participated. She added she would like to explore this further. Councilmember Mavity asked Ms. Ryan what her capacity is to take on this work for St. Louis Park, pointing out that Ms. Ryan is working with multiple communities on their visioning at this time. Ms. Ryan stated if she were to be chosen as the consultant for St. Louis Park, this would be the fourth group she is working for in Minnesota. She added if she were to get the St. Louis Park contract, she would not take on any additional work. Councilmember Sanger asked Ms. Ryan what the starting point is for this process and further asked if it would be based on the city’s last visioning process and goals. Ms. Ryan stated she would be researching the city’s past visioning and appreciative inquiry process, and past council goals. She added she would start here, and then have the first meeting, utilizing social media also. Ms. Ryan stated she could share examples with the council. Mayor Spano stated he appreciates Ms. Ryan’s enthusiasm and experience. He had heard about her commendable work from other mayors. Mr. Harmening stated the council will finalize their decision on the consultant in the next few weeks. Ms. Ryan thanked the council for their time and the WebEx meeting was concluded. The council discussed Ms. Ryan’s presentation. Mr. Harmening stated he knows Ms. Ryan’s work better than the first consultant who presented, noting she is involved in the Alliance for Innovation. He added she has been to the city managers’ conference, and she is a very engaging person. He stated both consultant firms would be fine, but it comes down to fit. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 3c) Page 4 Title: Special Study Session Minutes of August 1, 2016 Ms. McMonigal added staff is concerned about Ms. Ryan’s capacity to take on more work and would need to find out how much she would be a face participating in the project. She added the first consultant, David Buerle, would be very involved in the project, and he has more capacity. Ms. McMonigal went on to say that Ms. Ryan did assure the council she would be involved in the process. Mayor Spano stated the council will need to choose the consultant who has the best approach and best product for the city. Mr. Harmening noted that during the last comprehensive plan process, most of the work was done in-house, with the help of Mobius Consulting. Councilmember Mavity stated Ms. Ryan’s firm has the right culture, and the other consultant was not as engaging and more formulaic. She added sometimes being stretched can be a plus, in that Ms. Ryan is working with multiple cities at this time. She noted this may be a win-win, and the city and council will need to move fast so as not to lose Ms. Ryan. Councilmember Miller agreed with Councilmember Mavity. He liked how Ms. Ryan talked about her staff members and that she did not want the council to be on the steering committee. He also liked that Ms. Ryan wanted to engage neighborhood groups; her workshop in a kit idea; and her interaction with the council during the presentation. Councilmember Lindberg agreed that Ms. Ryan’s firm is the one, but he does have concerns about her capacity. He added her engagement and natural connection with the council was very noticeable. He stated he likes the first firm’s use of data and metrics but felt it might be too much data and that the relationship to the community got lost a bit. Councilmember Lindberg added it would be important to see Ms. Ryan actively engaged in this project. Councilmember Brausen agreed and stated he is on board with Ms. Ryan. Councilmember Hallfin stated he liked Ms. Ryan but actually preferred the data driven presentation by the first consultant. He liked getting into the nuts and bolts but noted he can tell the council likes Ms. Ryan’s firm and added that she would do a great job. Councilmember Sanger stated Ms. Ryan is far and away the better choice. She liked her outreach plan and the creativity behind it. She noted the first consultant’s presentation was just a corporate presentation, adding she is not sure it fits St. Louis Park very well. Councilmember Sanger stated Ms. Ryan’s approach is more well-suited to St. Louis Park, noting Ms. Ryan did discuss gathering data from the Metropolitan Council, and she appreciated that aspect. Councilmember Sanger added the first consultant talked a lot about data; however, she felt it was not scientific, nor was there much credence to their data. Mayor Spano stated he liked Ms. Ryan’s approach as well, noting that the first presentation had more data. He stated Ms. Ryan is very focused on who is at the table having the conversations, and that is most important for St. Louis Park. He added the fact that people are there, having the conversation, is almost as important as the outcome of the visioning process. He agreed the city wants to include those who are not usually sitting at the table, and Ms. Ryan picked up on this element. He stated he does not think the council should be on the steering committee and that the first consultant would rely too much on the council. Mayor Spano stated it will be important to City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 3c) Page 5 Title: Special Study Session Minutes of August 1, 2016 hear the council’s thoughts and perspectives, but this should not be the template. He suggested staff contact Ms. Ryan as soon as possible and hire her as the consultant for the visioning process. The council asked about costs for each consultant. Ms. McMonigal stated they both came in at the $130,000 to $150,000 range. Ms. McMonigal stated staff will reach out to Ms. Ryan immediately. The meeting adjourned at 7:15 p.m. Written Reports provided and documented for recording purposes only: 2. SWLRT Update ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Jake Spano, Mayor Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: August 15, 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Related to Temporary Health Care Dwellings RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to approve Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance amending Chapter 36 of the St. Louis Park Code of Ordinances relating to zoning to opt-out of Minnesota Statutes Section 462.3593 which defines and regulates Temporary Family Health Care Dwellings, and to approve the Summary Ordinance for Publication. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the council wish to opt-out of the Minnesota Statutes Section 462.3593 which defines and regulates Temporary Family Health Care Dwellings? SUMMARY: On May 12, 2016, Governor Dayton signed into law the creation and regulation of temporary family health care dwellings. The law defines Temporary Health Care Dwellings, establishes regulations for them, and requires municipalities to permit them in accordance to the regulations established by the statute. The same statutes also gives cities the option to opt-out of the regulations. The city does not need to provide a reason for opting out, nor does it have to provide an alternative or similar option. It simply has to pass an ordinance stating that the city is opting out of the regulations. Planning Commission Review: On July 20, 2016, the Planning Commission held a public hearing for the requested zoning amendment. No one was present to speak, and the Planning Commission recommended approval of the ordinance to opt-out of the statute. Council First Reading: The council approved the First Reading of the ordinance on August 1, 2016. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion Ordinance Summary Ordinance for Publication Minnesota Statute 462.3593 Prepared by: Gary Morrison, Assistant Zoning Administrator Reviewed by: Sean Walther, Planning & Zoning Supervisor Michele Schnitker, Housing Supervisor Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Consent Agenda Item: 4a City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Page 2 Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Related to Temporary Health Care Dwellings DISCUSSION ANALYSIS: The following is a brief summary of the law: 1. The dwelling is permitted for six months, with an option to extend the permit for another six months. 2. Requires written certification that the mentally or physically impaired person requires assistance with two or more instrumental activities of daily living. 3. Allows only one person to reside in the temporary dwelling at a time. 4. Requires that the permit be for a property where the “caregiver” or relative resides. 5. Allows modular or manufactured housing, and recreational vehicles to use this permit. 6. Lists criteria for the structure, including, construction, utility connections, and site location. 7. The municipality has 15 days to either approve or deny a permit. 8. The statute becomes effective September 1, 2016. 9. A municipality may, by ordinance, opt-out of the requirements of the statute. The statute allows a city to opt-out of the statute regulations if it adopts an ordinance declaring its decision to opt-out. After consulting with the city attorney, staff is recommending the city opt-out of the regulations for various reason including: 1. The use should not be permitted without discussion as to whether or not the use is appropriate for this community. 2. The city currently does not allow temporary dwellings. It should prevent any temporary dwellings from being installed without further review and study of the issue in St. Louis Park. Care needs to be taken that a temporary dwelling doesn’t conflict with current zoning code provisions, or create unforeseen issues. 3. The statute does not require that the person living in the temporary dwelling be a relative of the person living in the principal dwelling. Therefore, a resident can essentially run a caregiver business by providing a temporary dwelling unit to anyone needing temporary, supervised living. This is in conflict with current home occupation requirements. 4. The statute allows an RV to be used as the temporary dwelling. No anchoring is required for the RV type dwellings to prevent tipping in high winds. 5. Power is provided by an extension cord connected to the principal dwelling. Water is provided by a garden hose connected to the house. Sewer is handled in tanks requiring occasional pumping by sewage truck. 6. How does the city handle medical and health related documents that are submitted as an application for the dwelling? Applications are considered public information. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Page 3 Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Related to Temporary Health Care Dwellings ORDINANCE NO. ____-16 CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 36 OF THE ST. LOUIS PARK CITY CODE OPTING OUT OF TEMPORARY FAMILY HEALTH CARE DWELLING REQUIREMENTS WHEREAS, on May 12, 2016, Governor Dayton signed into law the creation and regulation of temporary family health care dwellings, codified at Minn. Stat. § 462.3593, which permit and regulate temporary family health care dwellings; and, WHEREAS, subdivision 9 of Minn. Stat. §462.3593 allows cities to “opt out” of those regulations; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK DOES ORDAIN: SECTION 1. St. Louis Park City Code Chapter 36 is amended to add the following section: Sec. 36-370. Opt-out of Minnesota Statutes Section 462.3593. Pursuant to authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.3593, subdivision 9, the City opts-out of the requirements of Minn. Stat. §462.3593, which defines and regulates Temporary Family Health Care Dwellings. SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall take effect fifteen days after its publication. Public Hearing July 20, 2016 First Reading August 1, 2016 Second Reading August 15, 2016 Date of Publication August 18, 2016 Date Ordinance takes effect September 2, 2016 Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council August 15, 2016 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Approved as to Form and Execution: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Soren Mattick, City Attorney City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Page 4 Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Related to Temporary Health Care Dwellings SUMMARY FOR PUBLICATION ORDINANCE NO.____-16 AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT RELATED TO TEMPORARY HEALTH CARE DWELLINGS This ordinance amends Chapter 36 of the St. Louis Park City Code opting out of temporary family health care dwelling requirements. This ordinance shall take effect 15 days after publication. Adopted by the City Council August 15, 2016 Jake Spano /s/ Mayor A copy of the full text of this ordinance is available for inspection with the City Clerk. Published in St. Louis Park Sailor: August 18, 2016 City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Page 5 Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Related to Temporary Health Care Dwellings [462.3593] TEMPORARY FAMILY HEALTH CARE DWELLINGS. Subdivision 1. Definitions. (a) For purposes of this section, the following terms have the meanings given. (b) "Caregiver" means an individual 18 years of age or older who: (1) provides care for a mentally or physically impaired person; and (2) is a relative, legal guardian, or health care agent of the mentally or physically impaired person for whom the individual is caring. (c) "Instrumental activities of daily living" has the meaning given in section 256B.0659, subdivision 1, paragraph (i). (d) "Mentally or physically impaired person" means a person who is a resident of this state and who requires assistance with two or more instrumental activities of daily living as certified in writing by a physician, a physician assistant, or an advanced practice registered nurse licensed to practice in this state. (e) "Relative" means a spouse, parent, grandparent, child, grandchild, sibling, uncle, aunt, nephew, or niece of the mentally or physically impaired person. Relative includes half, step, and in-law relationships. (f) "Temporary family health care dwelling" means a mobile residential dwelling providing an environment facilitating a caregiver's provision of care for a mentally or physically impaired person that meets the requirements of subdivision 2. Subd. 2. Temporary family health care dwelling. A temporary family health care dwelling must: (1) be primarily assembled at a location other than its site of installation; (2) be no more than 300 gross square feet; (3) not be attached to a permanent foundation; (4) be universally designed and meet state-recognized accessibility standards; (5) provide access to water and electric utilities either by connecting to the utilities that are serving the principal dwelling on the lot or by other comparable means; (6) have exterior materials that are compatible in composition, appearance, and durability to the exterior materials used in standard residential construction; (7) have a minimum insulation rating of R-15; (8) be able to be installed, removed, and transported by a one-ton pickup truck as defined in section 168.002, subdivision 21b, a truck as defined in section 168.002, subdivision 37, or a truck tractor as defined in section 168.002, subdivision 38; (9) be built to either Minnesota Rules, chapter 1360 or 1361, and contain an Industrialized Buildings Commission seal and data plate or to American National Standards Institute Code 119.2; and (10) be equipped with a backflow check valve. Subd. 3. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Page 6 Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Related to Temporary Health Care Dwellings Temporary dwelling permit; application. (a) Unless the municipality has designated temporary family health care dwellings as permitted uses, a temporary family health care dwelling is subject to the provisions in this section. A temporary family health care dwelling that meets the requirements of this section cannot be prohibited by a local ordinance that regulates accessory uses or recreational vehicle parking or storage. (b) The caregiver or relative must apply for a temporary dwelling permit from the municipality. The permit application must be signed by the primary caregiver, the owner of the property on which the temporary family health care dwelling will be located, and the resident of the property if the property owner does not reside on the property, and include: (1) the name, address, and telephone number of the property owner, the resident of the property if different from the owner, and the primary caregiver responsible for the care of the mentally or physically impaired person; and the name of the mentally or physically impaired person who will live in the temporary family health care dwelling; (2) proof of the provider network from which the mentally or physically impaired person may receive respite care, primary care, or remote patient monitoring services; (3) a written certification that the mentally or physically impaired person requires assistance with two or more instrumental activities of daily living signed by a physician, a physician assistant, or an advanced practice registered nurse licensed to practice in this state; (4) an executed contract for septic service management or other proof of adequate septic service management; (5) an affidavit that the applicant has provided notice to adjacent property owners and residents of the application for the temporary dwelling permit; and (6) a general site map to show the location of the temporary family health care dwelling and other structures on the lot. (c) The temporary family health care dwelling must be located on property where the caregiver or relative resides. A temporary family health care dwelling must comply with all setback requirements that apply to the primary structure and with any maximum floor area ratio limitations that may apply to the primary structure. The temporary family health care dwelling must be located on the lot so that septic services and emergency vehicles can gain access to the temporary family health care dwelling in a safe and timely manner. (d) A temporary family health care dwelling is limited to one occupant who is a mentally or physically impaired person. The person must be identified in the application. Only one temporary family health care dwelling is allowed on a lot. (e) Unless otherwise provided, a temporary family health care dwelling installed under this section must comply with all applicable state law, local ordinances, and charter provisions. Subd. 4. Initial permit term; renewal. The initial temporary dwelling permit is valid for six months. The applicant may renew the permit once for an additional six months. Subd. 5. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Page 7 Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Related to Temporary Health Care Dwellings Inspection. The municipality may require that the permit holder provide evidence of compliance with this section as long as the temporary family health care dwelling remains on the property. The municipality may inspect the temporary family health care dwelling at reasonable times convenient to the caregiver to determine if the temporary family health care dwelling is occupied and meets the requirements of this section. Subd. 6. Revocation of permit. The municipality may revoke the temporary dwelling permit if the permit holder violates any requirement of this section. If the municipality revokes a permit, the permit holder has 60 days from the date of revocation to remove the temporary family health care dwelling. Subd. 7. Fee. Unless otherwise provided by ordinance, the municipality may charge a fee of up to $100 for the initial permit and up to $50 for a renewal of the permit. Subd. 8. No public hearing required; application of section 15.99. (a) Due to the time-sensitive nature of issuing a temporary dwelling permit for a temporary family health care dwelling, the municipality does not have to hold a public hearing on the application. (b) The procedures governing the time limit for deciding an application for the temporary dwelling permit under this section are governed by section 15.99, except as provided in this section. The municipality has 15 days to issue a permit requested under this section or to deny it, except that if the statutory or home rule charter city holds regular meetings only once per calendar month the statutory or home rule charter city has 30 days to issue a permit requested under this section or to deny it. If the municipality receives a written request that does not contain all required information, the applicable 15-day or 30-day limit starts over only if the municipality sends written notice within five business days of receipt of the request telling the requester what information is missing. The municipality cannot extend the period of time to decide. Subd. 9. Opt-out. A municipality may by ordinance opt-out of the requirements of this section. Sec. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. This act is effective September 1, 2016, and applies to temporary dwelling permit applications made under this act on or after that date. Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: August 15, 2016 Consent Agenda Item: 4b EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Approve Right-of-Way Purchase – Highway 7/Louisiana Avenue Interchange Project (Project 2012-0100) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to approve right-of-way purchase in the total amount of $130,500 for Parcel 12 (R & N Real Estate, LLC for 3501 Louisiana Ave) and authorize the City Attorney to execute stipulation of settlement. POLICY CONSIDERATION: This action is consistent with previous direction given by the City Council as part of the Highway 7/ Louisiana Avenue Interchange Project. SUMMARY: An agreement has been reached on terms to purchase Parcel 12 (R & N Real Estate, LLC for 3501 Louisiana Ave) Attached is a copy of the proposed Stipulation of Settlement. At the July 16, 2012 City Council meeting, Council approved a resolution Authorizing Condemnation of Land for Public Purposes for the Highway 7/ Louisiana Avenue Interchange Project. Prior to that action, specific right of way needs were determined and appraisals for seven identified properties were conducted. As a result, the City Attorney commenced eminent domain proceedings pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 117 to acquire the necessary land over the seven properties identified. Pursuant to the “quick take” provisions of Minnesota Statutes. Parcel 12 is located along the northeast corner of Louisiana Avenue and Walker Street and the acquisition attained from this property was needed to accommodate the new roundabout at this intersection. This acquisition settlement is the sixth settlement purchase of the condemnation proceedings. Negotiations and condemnation settlements are still proceeding on one other property, Louisiana Oaks Apartments. When the negotiations are finalized this remaining property, similar purchase authorizations will be presented to Council. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The City is responsible for all right of way acquisition on the project. The project budget as previously presented anticipates right of way acquisition costs and potential cost increases during settlement. Funding for right of way acquisition will be provided through the HRA Levy. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion Parcel Map Stipulation of Settlement Prepared by: Joseph Shamla, Sr. Engineering Project Manager. Reviewed by: Debra Heiser, Engineering Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 4b) Page 2 Title: Approve Right-of-Way Purchase – Highway 7/Louisiana Avenue Interchange Project (Project 2012-0100) DISCUSSION BACKGROUND: On July 16, 2012, the City commenced eminent domain proceedings to acquire permanent and temporary construction easements from R & N Real Estate, LLC’s property (Parcel 12) for purposes in connection with the Trunk Highway 7 and Louisiana Avenue Right of Way project. The City’s initial appraisal was in the amount of $82,200. After back and forth negotiation, R & N Real Estate, LLC has offered to settle the matter for a lump sum of $130,500.00. This amount includes compensation for the permanent and temporary construction easements and construction interference, statutorily required reimbursement for R & N Real Estate LLC’s appraisal, and costs. R & N Real Estate, LLC has agreed to waive any claims for attorney’s fees. R & N Real Estate, LLC has also requested an acknowledgement from the City that it will accept storm water from its property due to the loss of a storm water pond it owned that had to be removed as part of the project. The City is already accepting storm water from the property. The City attorney will draft the necessary documents to acknowledge that the City will accept stormwater from the Property. 125/7/20123:57:16 PMS:\PT\S\Stlou\116227\5-dsgn\51-cadd\R-O-W\parcel sketches\Parcel Sketches.dgn5/7/201212 ParcelDATE: RIGHT OF WAY PARCEL LAYOUT LAYOUT BY: SEH Inc.Parcel No. SCALE: 1" = ’ OWNER : OWNER: PID NO. COUNTY : HENNEPIN CITY : ST. LOUIS PARK S.P. 163-080-083, 2706-226 NO. PARCEL SQ FT MNDOT R/W NEW SQ FT CITY R/W NEW SQ FT EASEMENT TEMPORARY MNDOT SQ FT EASEMENT TEMPORARY CITYADDITION NAME: LEGEND PROPOSED TEMPORARY EASEMENT PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY EXISTING CITY RIGHT OF WAY/PARCEL LINES EXISTING MNDOT RIGHT OF WAY PROPOSED LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION PROPOSED CONSRUCTION 50 171-172-142-0092R & N REAL ESTATE LLC 12 12 R & N REAL ESTATE LLC OAK PARK VILLAGE INCL ADJ 1/2 OF VAC ALLEY SUBJECT TO STREET OF SAID LOT 1 DIST 185.20 FT SLY FROM NW COR THOF DIST 188.32 SLY FROM NE COR THOF TO A PT ON W LINE WLY FROM THE ANGLE PT ON E LINE OF SAID LOT 1 THAT PART OF LOT 1 BLK 7 LYING SLY OF A LINE DRAWN BLK 007 3,400 3,371 24. 7 9’20.59’20’24.42’1.51’12 0 .14’ 7’ 1.54’WALKER ST.LOUI SI ANA AVE. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 4b) Title: Approve Right-of-Way Purchase – Highway 7/Louisiana Avenue Interchange Project (Project 2012-0100) Page 3 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT COUNTY OF HENNEPIN FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT CASE TYPE: CONDEMNATION City of St. Louis Park, a Minnesota Court File No. 27-CV-12-20082 municipal corporation, Judge Kathleen D. Sheehy Petitioner, vs. STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT Morris Communications Company, LLC, AS TO R AND N REAL a Georgia limited liability company; Clear ESTATE, LLC/PARCEL 12 Channel Outdoor, Inc., a Delaware corporation; 7201 Lake LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company; Richatti Investment Corp., a Montana corporation; Sam’s Real Estate Business Trust, a Delaware statutory trust; R and N Real Estate, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company; The Business Bank, a Minnesota banking corporation; MSP SLP Apartments, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company; Bankers’ Bank; Green Park Financial Limited Partnership, a District of Columbia limited partnership; CWCapital LLC, a Massachusetts limited liability company; Federal National Mortgage Association; GS Newport, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; John Doe and Mary Roe and County of Hennepin, Respondents. The Petitioner City of St. Louis Park above named, by and through its undersigned counsel and Respondent R and N Real Estate, LLC by and through its undersigned counsel, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 117.185, hereby stipulate that they have negotiated a settlement for the acquisition of fee title and a temporary construction easement as set forth in the attached Final Certificate. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 4b) Title: Approve Right-of-Way Purchase – Highway 7/Louisiana Avenue Interchange Project (Project 2012-0100) Page 4 2 1. The City will pay a total amount of $130,500.00 to Respondent R and N Real Estate, LLC in settlement of any and all claims relating to the acquisition by Petitioner of fee title and a temporary construction easement involved in these proceedings, including reimbursement for appraisal costs, interest, attorney’s fees, right of first refusal pursuant to Minn. Stat. §117.226, costs and disbursements. 2. Pursuant to the “quick take” condemnation process, on or about January 15, 2013, Petitioner deposited with the District Court Administrator the sum of $82,200.00, the Petitioner’s approved appraised value for the property identified as Parcel 12 in the Petition. 3. The Parcel 12 quick take deposit of $82,200.00, together with any accrued interest, shall be paid to the Petitioner and shall be mailed to Attorney James J. Mongé, III, Grand Oak Office Center I, 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290, Eagan, Minnesota, 55121. 4. Within ten (10) days of the City’s approval of the settlement, the City will issue a check in the amount of $130,500.00 payable to “R and N Real Estate, LLC” which shall constitute full payment of the settlement amount. Said check shall be delivered to Attorney James A. Yarosh, Siegel Brill, PA 100 Washington Ave. S, Suite 1300, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401. 5. The City will execute an instrument accepting storm water runoff from Parcel 12. 6. Upon payment of the amount due hereunder, the City may file its Final Certificate, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A”, and upon filing said Final Certificate, these proceedings shall be concluded. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 4b) Title: Approve Right-of-Way Purchase – Highway 7/Louisiana Avenue Interchange Project (Project 2012-0100) Page 5 3 7. This Stipulation of Settlement contains all the terms and conditions of the parties’ agreement. CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association Date:___________________, 2016 By: James J. Mongé, III, #029200X Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 651-452-5000 Attorneys for Petitioner SIEGEL BRILL PA Dated:_________________, 2016 By: James A. Yarosh, #0241854 100 Washington Ave. S, Suite 1300 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 612-337-6100 Attorneys Respondent Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 4b) Title: Approve Right-of-Way Purchase – Highway 7/Louisiana Avenue Interchange Project (Project 2012-0100) Page 6 4 EXHIBIT “A” TO STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT COUNTY OF HENNEPIN FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT CASE TYPE: CONDEMNATION City of St. Louis Park, a Minnesota Court File No. 27-CV-12-20082 municipal corporation, Judge Kathleen D. Sheehy Petitioner, vs. FINAL CERTIFICATE AS TO Morris Communications Company, LLC, PARCEL 12 (R AND N REAL a Georgia limited liability company; Clear ESTATE, LLC) Channel Outdoor, Inc., a Delaware corporation; 7201 Lake LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company; Richatti Investment Corp., a Montana corporation; Sam’s Real Estate Business Trust, a Delaware statutory trust; R and N Real Estate, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company; The Business Bank, a Minnesota banking corporation; MSP SLP Apartments, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company; Bankers’ Bank; Green Park Financial Limited Partnership, a District of Columbia limited partnership; CWCapital LLC, a Massachusetts limited liability company; Federal National Mortgage Association; GS Newport, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; John Doe and Mary Roe and County of Hennepin, Respondents. IN THE MATTER OF THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN LAND FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * FINAL CERTIFICATE R AND N REAL ESTATE, LLC * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * By authority of Minnesota Statutes Section 117.205, I hereby certify that the rights herein described have been taken by the City of St. Louis Park in eminent domain proceedings in City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 4b) Title: Approve Right-of-Way Purchase – Highway 7/Louisiana Avenue Interchange Project (Project 2012-0100) Page 7 5 conformity with the requirements of Chapter 117 of said statutes; that the Petitioner and Respondent R and N Real Estate, LLC have negotiated a settlement determining full compensation for damages sustained by the Petitioner’s taking; that all damages have been paid by the City of St. Louis Park to Respondent R and N Real Estate, LLC; that said proceedings, as they relate to Parcel 12 in the above matter, are now complete and that the City of St. Louis Park now holds fee title and temporary construction easements in the lands situated in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota and legally described on Exhibit “A” attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference. Dated:_____________, 2016. CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association By: James J. Mongé, III, #029200X Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Attorneys for Petitioner THE ABOVE CERTIFICATE IS HEREBY APPROVED AND THE COUNTY RECORDER AND/OR REGISTRAR OF TITLES IS HEREBY ORDERED TO ACCEPT A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE SAME FOR FILING WITH THE RECORDS OF HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA, OR CERTIFICATES OF TITLE COVERING THE ABOVE-DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY, IF ANY. Dated:_________________, 2016. BY THE COURT: The Honorable Kathleen D. Sheehy Judge of District Court THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Campbell Knutson Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 JJM:cjh City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 4b) Title: Approve Right-of-Way Purchase – Highway 7/Louisiana Avenue Interchange Project (Project 2012-0100) Page 8 6 EXHIBIT “A” TO FINAL CERTIFICATE PARCEL 12 – R and N Real Estate, LLC FEE TITLE ACQUISITION That part of Lot 1, Block 7, OAK PARK VILLAGE, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the southwest corner of said Lot 1; thence North 11 degrees 19 minutes 16 seconds West, assumed bearing, along the west line of said Lot 1, a distance of 10.10 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence South 83 degrees 24 minutes 11 seconds East 64.41 feet; thence southeasterly 34.90 feet along a tangential curve, concave to the southwest, central angle 05 degrees 17 minutes 38 seconds, radius 377.78 feet; thence North 74 degrees 39 minutes 29 seconds West, not tangent, 44.51 feet; thence northwesterly 16.34 feet along a tangential curve, concave to the northeast, central angle 34 degrees 40 minutes 44 seconds, radius 27.00 feet; thence northwesterly 47.32 feet along a compound curve, concave to the northeast, central angle 14 degrees 02 minutes 57 seconds, radius 193.00 feet; thence northwesterly 132.09 feet along a compound curve, concave to the northeast, central angle 08 degrees 33 minutes 06 seconds, radius 885.00 feet; thence South 72 degrees 25 minutes 19 seconds West, not tangent, 1.54 feet to a point on the west line of said Lot 1; thence South 11 degrees 19 minutes 16 seconds East, along said west line 172.62 feet to the point of beginning. This tract contains 3,400 square feet more or less and is subject to any and all easements of record. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS A temporary construction easement over, under, and across that part of Lot 1, Block 7, OAK PARK VILLAGE, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the southwest corner of said Lot 1; thence North 11 degrees 19 minutes 16 seconds West, assumed bearing, along the west line of said Lot 1, a distance of 10.10 feet to the northerly right of way line of Walker Street; thence South 83 degrees 24 minutes 11 seconds East, along said right of way line, 64.41 feet; thence southeasterly 34.90 feet along said right of way line, also being a tangential curve, concave to the southwest, central angle 05 degrees 17 minutes 38 seconds, radius 377.78 feet, to a point hereinafter referred to as “Point A”, to the point of beginning of the easement to be described; thence North 74 degrees 39 minutes 29 seconds West, not tangent, 44.51 feet; thence northwesterly 16.34 feet along a tangential curve, concave to the northeast, central angle 34 degrees 40 minutes 44 seconds, radius 27.00 feet; thence northwesterly 47.32 feet along a compound curve, concave to the northeast, central angle 14 degrees 02 minutes 57 seconds, radius 193.00 feet; thence northwesterly 132.09 feet along a compound curve, concave to the northeast, central angle 08 degrees 33 minutes 06 seconds, radius 885.00 feet; thence North 72 degrees 25 minutes 19 seconds East, not tangent, 7.00 feet; thence southeasterly 109.53 feet along a non tangential curve, concave City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 4b) Title: Approve Right-of-Way Purchase – Highway 7/Louisiana Avenue Interchange Project (Project 2012-0100) Page 9 7 to the northeast, central angle 07 degrees 08 minutes 51 seconds, radius 878.00 feet, chord bearing South 20 degrees 57 minutes 02 seconds East, chord length 109.46 feet; thence South 47 degrees 07 minutes 55 seconds East, not tangent, 120.14 feet; thence South 13 degrees 42 minutes 25 seconds West 1.51 feet to the northerly right of way line of Walker Street; thence northwesterly 2.72 feet along said northerly right of way line, along a non tangential curve, concave to the south, central angle 00 degrees 24 minutes 47 seconds, radius 377.78 feet, chord bearing North 77 degrees 54 minutes 10 seconds West, chord length 2.72 feet to the point of beginning. And together with that part of said Lot 1, Block 7 described as follows: Commencing at said “Point A”; thence southeasterly 113.33 feet along said curve, also being the northerly right of way of Walker Street, central angle 17 degrees 11 minutes 16 seconds to the point of beginning of the easement to be described; thence continuing southeasterly 25.00 feet along said curve, central angle 03 degrees 47 minutes 30 seconds to the southeasterly line of said Lot 1; thence North 43 degrees 14 minutes 44 seconds East along said southeasterly line 20.32 feet; thence northwesterly 24.94 feet along a non tangential curve, concave to the southwest, central angle 03 degrees 35 minutes 32 seconds, radius 397.78 feet, chord bearing North 58 degrees 23 minutes 57 seconds West, chord length 24.94 feet; thence South 43 degrees 15 minutes 03 seconds West 20.59 feet to the point of beginning. Said temporary easements commence April 1, 2013 and expire November 30, 2015. (Abstract) City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 4b) Title: Approve Right-of-Way Purchase – Highway 7/Louisiana Avenue Interchange Project (Project 2012-0100) Page 10 Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: August 15, 2016 Consent Agenda Item: 4c EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Accept Monetary Donation from Jeanne and Steve Prawer to Westwood Hills Nature Center ($2,200) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution approving acceptance of a monetary donation from Jeanne and Steve Prawer in the amount of $2,200 for Westwood Hills Nature Center. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish to accept the gift with restrictions on its use? SUMMARY: State statute requires City Council’s acceptance of donations. This requirement is necessary in order to make sure the City Council has knowledge of any restrictions placed on the use of each donation prior to it being expended. Jeanne and Steve Prawer graciously donated $2,200 to Westwood Hills Nature Center. The donation is given with the restriction that it be used at Westwood Hills Nature Center for a bench in appreciation of the natural beauty of the Westwood Hills Nature Center. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: None VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged community. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution Prepared by: Carrie Mandler, Secretary / Program Aide Reviewed by: Mark Oestreich, Manager of Westwood Hills Nature Center Cynthia S. Walsh, Director of Operations & Recreation Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 4c) Page 2 Title: Accept Monetary Donation from Jeanne and Steve Prawer to Westwood Hills Nature Center ($2,200) RESOLUTION NO. 16-____ RESOLUTION APPROVING ACCEPTANCE OF DONATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,200 TO BE USED AT THE WESTWOOD HILLS NATURE CENTER FOR A BENCH IN APPRECIATION OF THE NATURAL BEAUTY OF THE WESTWOOD HILLS NATURE CENTER WHEREAS, The City of St. Louis Park is required by State statute to authorize acceptance of any donations; and WHEREAS, the City Council must also ratify any restrictions placed on the donation by the donor; and WHEREAS, Jeanne and Steve Prawer donated $2,200 to be used at Westwood Hills Nature Center for an appreciation bench. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park that the gift is hereby accepted with thanks to Jeanne and Steve Prawer with the understanding that it must be used at Westwood Hills Nature Center for a bench in appreciation of the natural beauty of the Westwood Hills Nature Center. Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council August 15, 2016 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: August 15, 2016 Consent Agenda Item: 4d EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Urban Park Apartments Private Activity Revenue Bonds Letter of Credit Change RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution acknowledging the issuance of a substitute confirming letter of credit to secure the City’s variable rate demand multifamily housing refunding revenue bonds (Urban Park Apartments Project), series 2010B, and approving and authorizing the execution of documents related thereto. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish to undertake the action as proposed? SUMMARY: On September 28th, 2010 the city issued private activity revenue bonds for the Urban Park Apartments project, series 2010B. The bonds have a confirming letter of credit which is set to expire on September 30, 2016. The request is to allow West Suburban Housing Partners VII Limited Partnership to substitute the confirming letter of credit with U.S. Bank National Association instead of the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) of Des Moines. In addition, they have asked to be allowed to amend the bond documents to allow substitutions of letters of credits as they expire. The City’s bond counsel has no concerns with the proposed action (see attached letter) FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The City has no financial responsibility to repay the private activity revenue bonds. The bonds will still have an Irrevocable Letter of Credit from Crown Bank and a Confirming Letter of Credit from US Bank instead of the FHLB. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion Bond Attorney Summary Letter Resolution Prepared by: Tim Simon, Chief Financial Officer Reviewed by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 4d) Page 2 Title: Urban Park Apartments Private Activity Revenue Bonds Letter of Credit Change DISCUSSION BACKGROUND: On September 28th 2010, the City issued private activity revenue bonds for the purpose of refunding existing debt from the bond issue in 2002. The bonds issued in 2002 provided for the construction and equipping of a 90-unit multi-family rental housing development know as Urban Park. When the refunding bonds were issued in 2010 for the purpose of redeeming and prepaying a portion of the bonds issued in 2002. Two financial institutions where involved in the transaction Wells Fargo (the trustee) and Crown Bank. Crown Bank provided an irrevocable letter of credit and a confirming letter of credit was issued by Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines which is set to expire on September 30, 2016. Since the time of the bond issue, US Bank also provides confirming letter of credits. The borrower has asked if they can substitute the Federal Home Loan Bank confirming letter of credit with US Bank. No additional risk or exposure exists with these bonds as they are private activity bonds. Bond attorney has reviewed all documents and has no concerns. NEXT STEPS: If adopted staff will execute the related documents in the next few weeks. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 4d) Page 3 Title: Urban Park Apartments Private Activity Revenue Bonds Letter of Credit Change JULIE A. EDDINGTON Attorney at Law Direct Dial (612) 337-9213 Email: jeddington@kennedy-graven.com August 3, 2016 Tim Simon, Chief Financial Officer City of St. Louis Park 5005 Minnetonka Boulevard St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Re: Resolution relating to a substitute Confirming Letter of Credit relating to Subordinate Variable Rate Demand Multifamily Housing Refunding Revenue Bonds (Urban Park Apartments Project), Series 2010B Dear Tim, On September 28, 2010, the City of St. Louis Park (the “City”) issued its Variable Rate Demand Multifamily Housing Refunding Revenue Bonds (Urban Park Apartments Project), Series 2010B (the “Series 2010B Bonds”), in the original aggregate principal amount of $1,500,000, for the benefit of West Suburban Housing Partners VII Limited Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership (the “Borrower”). The Series 2010B Bonds were issued pursuant to a Trust Indenture, dated September 1, 2010 (the “Original Indenture”), between the City and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee (the “Trustee”). The City loaned the proceeds of the Series 2010B Bonds to the Borrower pursuant to a Financing Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2010 (the “Original Financing Agreement”), between the City and the Borrower, for the purpose of redeeming and prepaying a portion of the Variable Rate Demand Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds (At the Park Project), Series 2002A (the “Prior Bonds”), issued by the City in the original aggregate principal amount of $9,075,000. The proceeds of the Prior Bonds were used to finance the acquisition, construction, and equipping of a 90-unit multifamily rental housing development now known as “Urban Park” and located at 3601 Phillips Parkway in the City. In conjunction with the issuance of the Series 2010B Bonds, in order to secure the Borrower’s repayment obligations under the Original Financing Agreement, Crown Bank (the “Bank”) issued an Irrevocable Letter of Credit (the “Letter of Credit”) for the benefit of the Trustee. The Bank’s obligations under the Letter of Credit were in turn secured by an Irrevocable Confirming Letter of Credit (the “Initial Confirming Letter of Credit”) issued by Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines (the “Initial Bank”). The Initial Confirming Letter of Credit expires on September 30, 2016, and the Borrower has chosen not to renew it. Instead, the Borrower has made arrangements for a new confirming letter of credit to be issued by U.S. Bank National Association (the “Confirming Bank”). This new confirming letter of credit will be issued as a substitute Confirming Letter of Credit (the “Substitute Confirming Letter of Credit”). The Borrower is requesting that the City Council consider the enclosed resolution on August 15, 2016, which approves the Substitute Confirming Letter of Credit and authorizes the execution by City officials of a First Supplemental Trust Indenture, which supplements the Original Indenture (as supplemented, the “Indenture”), and a First Amendment to Financing Agreement, which amends the Original Financing Agreement (as amended, the “Financing Agreement”). These documents incorporate, Offices in Minneapolis Saint Paul St. Cloud 470 U.S. Bank Plaza 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 337-9300 telephone (612) 337-9310 fax www.kennedy-graven.com Affirmative Action, Equal Opportunity Employer City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 4d) Page 4 Title: Urban Park Apartments Private Activity Revenue Bonds Letter of Credit Change among other things, the proposed terms of the Substitute Confirming Letter of Credit. I have added a provision to both documents that will allow for the City Manager to execute any future amendments or supplements to the Indenture and the Financing Agreements relating to future changes to the Letter of Credit or Confirming Letter of Credit without needing to seek prior approval by the City Council. The Series 2010B Bonds will continue to be special, limited obligations of the City, do not constitute a general or moral obligation of the City, and will not be secured by the full faith and credit or taxing powers of the City. Sincerely, Julie A. Eddington City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 4d) Page 5 Title: Urban Park Apartments Private Activity Revenue Bonds Letter of Credit Change RESOLUTION NO. 16-____ RESOLUTION ACKNOWLEDGING THE ISSUANCE OF A SUBSTITUTE CONFIRMING LETTER OF CREDIT TO SECURE THE CITY’S SUBORDINATE VARIABLE RATE DEMAND MULTIFAMILY HOUSING REFUNDING REVENUE BONDS (URBAN PARK APARTMENTS PROJECT), SERIES 2010B, AND APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF DOCUMENTS RELATED THERETO WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota (the “City”) is a home rule charter city duly organized and existing under its Charter and the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, as amended (the “Act”), a resolution adopted by the City Council of the City on September 20, 2010 (the “Bond Resolution”), and a Trust Indenture, dated as of September 1, 2010 (the “Original Indenture”), between the City and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee (the “Trustee”), the City issued its Subordinate Variable Rate Demand Multifamily Housing Refunding Revenue Bonds (Urban Park Apartments Project), Series 2010B (the “Series 2010B Bonds”), in the original aggregate principal amount of $1,500,000, for the benefit of West Suburban Housing Partners VII Limited Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership (the “Borrower”); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of a Financing Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2010 (the “Original Financing Agreement”), between the City and the Borrower, the City loaned the proceeds of the Bonds to the Borrower for the purpose of redeeming and prepaying a portion of the Variable Rate Demand Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds (At the Park Project), Series 2002A (the “Prior Bonds”), issued by the City in the original aggregate principal amount of $9,560,000; and WHEREAS, the proceeds of the Prior Bonds were used to finance the acquisition, construction, and equipping of a 90-unit multifamily rental housing development now known as “Urban Park” at located at 3601 Phillips Parkway in the City (the “Project”); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of a Reimbursement Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2010 (the “Reimbursement Agreement”), between the Borrower and Crown Bank, a Minnesota banking corporation (the “Bank”), the Bank issued its direct-pay Irrevocable Letter of Credit No. 4990177 (the “Letter of Credit”) for the benefit of the Trustee in order to secure the Borrower’s repayment obligations under the Original Financing Agreement; and WHEREAS, in conjunction with the issuance of the Original Letter of Credit, pursuant to a Confirming Letter of Credit Reimbursement Agreement, dated September 28, 2010 (the “Initial Confirming Letter of Credit Reimbursement Agreement”), between the Bank and the Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines (the “Initial Confirming Bank”), the Initial Confirming Bank issued its Irrevocable Confirming Letter of Credit No. 2492-6 (the “Initial Confirming Letter of Credit”), which was delivered to the Trustee and could be drawn upon by the Trustee in the event that the Letter of Credit is wrongfully terminated, repudiated, or dishonored; and WHEREAS, the Initial Confirming Letter of Credit expires on September 30, 2016 and will not be renewed by the Initial Confirming Bank; and City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 4d) Page 6 Title: Urban Park Apartments Private Activity Revenue Bonds Letter of Credit Change WHEREAS, the Borrower has arranged for a new confirming letter of credit to be issued by U.S. Bank National Association, a national banking association (the “Confirming Bank”), as a substitute Irrevocable Confirming Letter of Credit (the “Substitute Confirming Letter of Credit”) for the benefit of the Trustee to secure the Bank’s obligations under the Letter of Credit; and WHEREAS, the Substitute Confirming Letter of Credit is proposed to be delivered by the Confirming Bank to the Trustee and become effective on or after September 1, 2016, pursuant to the terms of a Reimbursement Agreement or similar agreement (the “Confirming Letter of Credit Reimbursement Agreement”), between the Bank and the Confirming Bank; and WHEREAS, unless the holders of the Series 2010B Bonds provide a waiver, Section 4.2(1) of the Indenture requires a mandatory tender of all Series 2010B Bonds upon the expiration or termination of the Initial Confirming Letter of Credit; and WHEREAS, a supplement to the Official Statement, dated September 24, 2010, related to the Series 2010B Bonds, has been prepared and is proposed to be distributed in connection with the Confirming Bank’s issuance of the Substitute Confirming Letter of Credit and to provide for the remarketing of the Series 2010B Bonds in the event that the holders of the Series 2010B Bonds do not waive the mandatory tender of the Series 2010B Bonds; and WHEREAS, in conjunction with the delivery of the Substitute Confirming Letter of Credit, the City, as issuer of the Series 2010B Bonds, must approve certain actions of the parties and execute various document amendments to incorporate the terms of the Substitute Confirming Letter of Credit into the documents related to the Series 2010B Bonds; and WHEREAS, there have been presented before this City Council a form of First Supplemental Trust Indenture (the “First Supplemental Indenture”) proposed to be entered into by the City and the Trustee and consented to by the Bank, which supplements and amends the Original Indenture (as so supplemented and amended, the “Indenture”), and a First Amendment to Financing Agreement (the “First Amendment to Financing Agreement”) proposed to be entered into between the City and the Borrower and consented to by the Trustee and the Bank, which amends and supplements the Original Financing Agreement (as so amended and supplemented, the “Financing Agreement”), which incorporate, among other things, the proposed terms of the Substitute Confirming Letter of Credit; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota: 1. The City Council acknowledges the issuance of the Substitute Confirming Letter of Credit by the Confirming Bank to be delivered to the Trustee to secure the Bank’s obligations under the Letter of Credit. 2. The City Council hereby approves the First Supplemental Indenture and the First Amendment to Financing Agreement substantially in the forms on file with the City on the date hereof, which are hereby approved, with such changes as shall be approved by the City Manager and Kennedy & Graven, Chartered, as bond counsel to the City (“Bond Counsel”); provided that the execution thereof by the Mayor and the City Manager shall be conclusive evidence of such approval. 3. The Mayor and the City Manager are hereby designated as the representatives of the City with respect to the Substitute Confirming Letter of Credit transaction. The Mayor, the City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 4d) Page 7 Title: Urban Park Apartments Private Activity Revenue Bonds Letter of Credit Change City Manager, and other officers of the City are authorized and directed to execute and deliver any and all certificates, agreements, or other documents which are required by the Original Indenture, or any other agreements, certificates or documents which are deemed necessary by Bond Counsel to complete the Substitute Confirming Letter of Credit transaction or to evidence compliance with applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and any applicable Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder. In the event that for any reason the Mayor is unable to carry out the execution of any of the documents or other acts provided herein, any other member of the City Council of the City shall be authorized to act in his or her capacity and undertake such execution or acts on behalf of the City with full force and effect, which execution or acts shall be valid and binding on the City. If for any reason the City Manager is unable to execute and deliver the documents referred to in this resolution, such documents may be executed by a member of the City Council, with the same force and effect as if such documents were executed and delivered by the City Manager. All such agreements or representations when made shall be deemed to be agreements or representations, as the case may be, of the City. 4. The City has not participated in the preparation of the supplement to the Official Statement (the “Official Statement Supplement”) and has made no independent investigation with respect to the information contained therein, including the appendices thereto, and the City assumes no responsibility for the sufficiency, accuracy, or completeness of such information. Subject to the foregoing, the City hereby consents to the distribution and the use by Dougherty & Company LLC of the Official Statement Supplement in connection with the issuance of the Substitute Letter of Credit by the Confirming Bank and, if deemed necessary, to remarket the Series 2010B Bonds. 5. As originally stated in the Bond Resolution, the Series 2010B Bonds are special, limited obligations of the City payable solely from the revenues of the Project. The principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Series 2010B Bonds shall be payable solely from the revenue pledged therefor and the Bonds shall not constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of any constitutional, statutory, or Charter limitation nor give rise to a pecuniary liability of the City or a charge against its general credit or assets and shall not constitute a charge, lien, or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the City other than the City’s interest in the Project. The Bonds are not general or moral obligations of the City and are not secured by any taxing power of the City. 6. This resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage. Adopted by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, on this 15th day of August, 2016. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council August 15, 2016 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: August 15, 2016 Consent Agenda Item: 4e EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Special Assessment – Sewer Service Line Repair at 2731 Salem Avenue South RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution authorizing the special assessment for the repair of the sewer service line at 2731 Salem Avenue South, St. Louis Park, Minnesota. P.I.D. 31-029-24-32-0140 POLICY CONSIDERATION: The proposed action is consistent with policy previously established by the City Council. SUMMARY: Aaron and Suzanne Blackman, owners of the single family residence at 2731 Salem Avenue South, have requested the City to authorize the repair of the sewer service line for their home and assess the cost against the property in accordance with the City’s special assessment policy. The City requires the repair of service lines to promote the general public health, safety and welfare within the community. The special assessment policy for the repair or replacement of water or sewer service lines for existing homes was adopted by the City Council in 1996. This program was put into place because sometimes property owners face financial hardships when emergency repairs like this are unexpectedly required. Plans and permits for this service line repair work were completed, submitted, and approved by City staff. The property owners hired a contractor and repaired the sewer service line in compliance with current codes and regulations. Based on the completed work, this repair qualifies for the City’s special assessment program. The property owners have petitioned the City to authorize the sewer service line repair and special assess the cost of the repair. The total eligible cost of the repair has been determined to be $6,265.00. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The City has funds in place to finance the cost of this special assessment. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution Prepared by: Jay Hall, Utility Superintendent Reviewed by: Mark Hanson, Public Works Superintendent Patricia A. Sulander, Accountant Tim Simon, Chief Financial Officer Cynthia S. Walsh, Director of Operations and Recreation Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Page 2 Title: Special Assessment – Sewer Service Line Repair at 2731 Salem Avenue South RESOLUTION NO. 16-____ RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE REPAIR OF THE SEWER SERVICE LINE AT 2731 SALEM AVENUE SOUTH, ST LOUIS PARK, MN P.I.D. 31-029-24-32-0140 WHEREAS, the Property Owners at 2731 Salem Avenue South, have petitioned the City of St. Louis Park to authorize a special assessment for the repair of the sewer service line for the single family residence located at 2731 Salem Avenue South; and WHEREAS, the Property Owners have agreed to waive the right to a public hearing, right of notice and right of appeal pursuant to Minnesota Statute, Chapter 429; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park has received a report from the Utility Superintendent related to the repair of the sewer service line. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, that: 1. The petition from the Property Owners requesting the approval and special assessment for the sewer service line repair is hereby accepted. 2. The sewer service line repair that was done in conformance with the plans and specifications approved by the Public Works Department and Department of Inspections is hereby accepted. 3. The total cost for the repair of the sewer service line is accepted at $6,265.00. 4. The Property Owners have agreed to waive the right to a public hearing, notice and appeal from the special assessment; whether provided by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, or by other statutes, or by ordinance, City Charter, the constitution, or common law. 5. The Property Owners have agreed to pay the City for the total cost of the above improvements through a special assessment over a ten (10) year period at the interest rate of 4.00%. 6. The Property Owners have executed an agreement with the City and all other documents necessary to implement the repair of the sewer service line and the special assessment of all costs associated therewith. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council August 15, 2016 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: August 15, 2016 Consent Agenda Item: 4f EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Traffic Study No. 668: Authorize Removal of Permit Parking at 3125 Idaho Ave. S. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution authorizing the elimination of permit parking restrictions in front of 3125 Idaho Avenue South. POLICY CONSIDERATION: The proposed action is consistent with City policy. SUMMARY: The City has a program for authorizing permit parking for residents who have a medical need for parking adjacent to their homes. Each year, staff contacts residents who currently have permit parking to ensure that it is still required. Several residents have notified the City that their permit parking is no longer necessary and may be removed. Staff has removed the permit parking signs. The final step is to rescind the original resolutions authorizing the permit parking. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The cost of removing these controls is minimal and will come out of the general operating budget. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution Prepared by: Chris Iverson, Transportation Engineer Reviewed by: Debra Heiser, Engineering Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Page 2 Title: Traffic Study No. 668: Authorize Removal of Permit Parking at 3125 Idaho Ave. S. RESOLUTION NO. 16-___ RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ELIMINATION OF PERMIT PARKING RESTRICTIONS IN FRONT OF 3125 IDAHO AVENUE SOUTH AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 00-024 TRAFFIC STUDY NO. 668 WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota has been requested, has studied, and has determined that traffic controls are no longer necessary at this location. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, that the Engineering Director is hereby authorized to remove the following traffic controls and rescind the following resolution: 1. Rescind Resolution No. 00-024 for the existing permit parking restriction at 3125 Idaho Avenue South. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council August 15, 2016 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: August 15, 2016 Consent Agenda Item: 4g EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: MCWD-Park Nicollet Partnership for Floodplain Management and Enhancement RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution supporting the partnership between Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) and Park Nicollet to protect, restore, enhance, and maintain Minnehaha Creek. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council support the Park Nicollet-MCWD partnership at the Methodist Hospital campus and MCWD adding ongoing vegetation maintenance in the 3-acre wetland restoration area to its capital improvement plan? SUMMARY: On June 20, 2016 St. Louis Park City Council approved a Conditional Use Permit for Park Nicollet Methodist Hospital to construct a floodwall within the floodplain and a variance to construct associated compensatory storage through wetland restoration within the Minnehaha Creek floodplain though a partnership with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD). Through the partnership, Park Nicollet is responsible for the capital construction costs and MCWD will be in charge of performing ongoing vegetation maintenance. Despite MCWD’s limited involvement in the construction, this project meets their legal definition of a capital project. In order for MCWD to proceed with the partnership with Park Nicollet, MCWD’s Comprehensive Plan requires a resolution of support for the capital construction project from the city in which the project is located. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis park is committed to being a leader in environmental stewardship. We will increase environmental consciousness and responsibility in all areas of city business. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution Prepared by: Jennifer Monson, Planner Reviewed by: Sean Walther, Planning and Zoning Supervisor Michele Schnitker, Housing Supervisor/CD Deputy Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 4g) Page 2 Title: MCWD-Park Nicollet Partnership for Floodplain Management and Enhancement RESOLUTION NO. 16-____ RESOLUTION SUPPORTING MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT – PARK NICOLLET PARTNERSHIP FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT AND WETLAND ENHANCEMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) and the City of St. Louis Park have enjoyed a sustained and strategic partnership to protect, restore and enhance Minnehaha Creek; and WHEREAS, the MCWD and City of St. Louis Park’s partnership has managed regional stormwater runoff, expanded and enhanced riparian greenspace, provided vital community connections, and facilitated economic development around the Minnehaha Creek Greenway; and WHEREAS, the MCWD and the City of St. Louis Park are committed to continuing the Minnehaha Creek Greenway partnership through the integration of municipal and water resource planning; and WHEREAS, in 2008 the MCWD and Park Nicollet Health Services collaborated to realign 1,400 feet of Minnehaha Creek, providing access to 10 acres of restored greenspace through a 1,900 foot boardwalk at Methodist Hospital; and WHEREAS, in 2014, due to record flooding Park Nicollet experienced high water that impacted the operation of its loading docks at Methodist Hospital; and WHEREAS, Park Nicollet Health Services subsequently established goals of improving flood protection for Methodist Hospital; and WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution 14-087, in 2015 the MCWD and Park Nicollet executed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) documenting their mutual interest in creatively and collaboratively identifying a range of flood solutions for the hospital; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding Park Nicollet and MCWD identified an opportunity to enhance site wetlands in a manner that would exceed floodplain management requirements, improve ecological function and value, and enhance site aesthetics; and WHEREAS, in coordination with the City of St. Louis Park and pursuant to MCWD resolution 16-030, in March 2016 MCWD and Park Nicollet executed a Cooperative Agreement memorializing a mutual commitment to advancing the wetland enhancement project as a potential floodplain compensatory storage solution, while conducting master planning for the Methodist Campus; and WHEREAS, under the Cooperative Agreement, Park Nicollet and MCWD advanced the design of the wetland enhancement, coordinated regulatory requirements and wish to advance the partnership for ecological improvements and floodplain management into the construction phase; and City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 4g) Page 3 Title: MCWD-Park Nicollet Partnership for Floodplain Management and Enhancement WHEREAS, the proposed project furthers Park Nicollet’s mission to improve health and well-being in partnership with our members, patients and community; and WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park finds this project consistent with its Comprehensive Plan goals and its standing partnership with the MCWD to integrate public and private plans and investments to expand and enhance the Minnehaha Creek Greenway. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, that the City supports the MCWD-Park Nicollet Partnership for floodplain management and wetland enhancement. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council August 15, 2016 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: August 15, 2016 Consent Agenda Item: 4h EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Final Payment Resolution - Local Street Rehab (Area 1) - Project No. 2012-1000 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution accepting work and authorizing final payment in the amount of $65,254.02 for Project 2012-1000 Local Street Rehabilitation Project (Area 1) with ASTECH Corporation, Contract No. 35-13. POLICY CONSIDERATION: None at this time SUMMARY: On April 15, 2013, the City Council awarded a contract in the amount of $1,357,961.60 to ASTECH Corporation for the Local Street Rehab Project (Area 1) Project 2012- 1000. The project consisted of removing and replacing the existing bituminous pavement and replacing portions of concrete curb and gutter work in the Sorensen, Lenox, Oak Hill, and Texa- Tonka Neighborhoods. Other work associated with the project included limited watermain replacements, drainage system repairs, and fire hydrant replacements. The Contractor completed the work at a final contract cost of $1,284,180.36. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The final contract cost, $1,284,180.36, is $73,781.24 less than the awarded contract amount, $1,357,961.60. This is because the actual quantities for work to be done were less than the estimated quantities. This project was planned for and included in the City’s adopted Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and paid for with funds from the Pavement Management Fund, and Water Utility Fund. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution Prepared by: Jack Sullivan, Senior Project Manager Reviewed by: Debra Heiser, Engineering Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 4h) Page 2 Title: Final Payment Resolution - Local Street Rehab (Area 1) - Project No. 2012-1000 RESOLUTION NO. 16-____ RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK ON STREET PROJECT LOCAL STREET REHAB (AREA 1) CITY PROJECT NO. 2012-1000 CONTRACT NO. 35-13 NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Pursuant to a written contract with the City dated April 15, 2013, ASTECH Corporation has satisfactorily completed the Street Project – Local Street Rehab (Area 1) – Project 2012-1000. 2. The Engineering Director has filed her recommendations for final acceptance of the work. 3. The work completed under this contract is accepted and approved. The final contract cost is $1,284,180.36. 4. The City Manager is directed to make final payment on this contract, taking the contractor's receipt in full. Final Contract Amount $ 1,284,180.36 Previous Payments $ 1,218,926.34 Balance Due $ 65,254.02 Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council August 15, 2016 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: August 15, 2016 Consent Agenda Item: 4i OFFICIAL MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA JULY 20, 2016 – 6:00 p.m. COUNCIL CHAMBERS MEMBERS PRESENT: Lynne Carper, Lisa Peilen, Richard Person, Carl Robertson, Joe Tatalovich, Ethan Rickert (youth member) MEMBERS ABSENT: Claudia Johnston-Madison, Torrey Kanne STAFF PRESENT: Sean Walther, Nicole Mardell, Jennifer Monson, Gary Morrison 1. Call to Order – Roll Call Vice Chair Peilen called the meeting to order. 2. Approval of Minutes of June 15, 2016 Commissioner Carper made a motion approving the minutes of June 15, 2016. Commissioner Person seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 3-0-2 (Peilen and Robertson abstained). 3. Public Hearings A. Parkway 25 Preliminary and Final PUD; Preliminary and Final Plat Location: 4001 and 4025 State Highway 7 Applicant: Sela Group, LLC Case No.: 16-13-S and 16-14-PUD Nicole Mardell, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. She explained the proposal for redevelopment of the former Vescio’s restaurant and ValuStay Inn site is to demolish the existing buildings, combine the properties, and develop a 5-story, mixed-use building with 111 residential units, 8,500 sq. ft. of commercial space, and parking located in two surface lots and in an underground parking ramp. Commissioner Carper asked about sidewalks and the alley. Ms. Mardell responded that there will be sidewalk on Glenhurst, along the frontage road, and along the interior parking lots. She said the alley is currently unimproved. The applicant will be responsible for widening and paving the alley. Vice Chair Peilen asked how a resident with underground parking would exit the site. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 4i) Page 2 Title: Planning Commission Meeting Minutes July 20, 2016 Ms. Mardell responded the exit would be up the ramp, through the south parking lot and onto Glenhurst. She added that the alley exit is for additional circulation if the parking lot is full. Vice Chair Peilen said at the present time there is only a stop sign at Glenhurst. She asked if the city had plans for that intersection as there will be two developments in the vicinity. Sean Walther, Planning and Zoning Supervisor, noted that a traffic study was completed for the development. Operations at Glenhurst Ave S and the frontage road are expected to have a Level of Service A. The study relied on counts predating the closing of the Hwy. 7 bridge over Highway 100, and includes the Shoreham Development and the proposed development in the models. Dean Dovolis, applicant, DJR Architects, provided an overview of the proposed development. They hope to start construction in spring 2017. In response to Commissioner Carper’s questions, Mr. Dovolis discussed solar panels, green roof, LED lighting, resident gardens, parking lot surface, and on-street parking. Paz Sela, owner, spoke briefly about parking. The Vice Chair opened the public hearing. As no one was present wishing to speak she closed the public hearing. Commissioner Robertson stated it is a nice project. He thanked DJR Architecture for consistently bringing very thoughtful designs to St. Louis Park. Commissioner Robertson made a motion recommending approval of the Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development and Preliminary and Final Plat. Commissioner Tatalovich seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 5-0. B. 10 West Preliminary and Final PUD; Preliminary and Final Plat Location: 1601 Utica Ave. S. Applicant: The Excelsior Group and Ryan Companies Case No.: 16-25-S and 16-26-PUD Nicole Mardell, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. The PUD request is to allow construction of an 11-story Class A office tower. The building is the fourth phase of the Central Park West PUD. The plat request is to subdivide the existing Outlot A into two additions, one for the proposed North Tower and one for a future South Tower. Commissioner Robertson asked for follow-up on the two concerns raised at the neighborhood meeting. Ms. Mardell responded that the applicant suggested incorporation of a Travel Demand Management (TDM) plan and different measures, such as bike facilities, to decrease the amount of traffic onto Lilac Dr. in Golden Valley. The TDM plan will probably be produced before the first City Council meeting on this matter. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 4i) Page 3 Title: Planning Commission Meeting Minutes July 20, 2016 Sean Walther, Planning and Zoning Supervisor, noted that as part of its approvals for the Central Park West PUD, the Golden Valley city council did require additional improvements that will be constructed later this summer. That includes expansion of a roadway underpass underneath Hwy. 100 that will allow for a trail along the south side of that area. There will also be a 3-way stop and right and left dedicated turn lanes on the Wayzata Blvd on east side of Hwy. 100. Ms. Mardell said the applicant is working with iHeartMedia Corp. to address concerns about disruption of radio signal transmission. Tony Barranco, Ryan Companies, thanked the Commission for their input at the study session. He discussed LEED certification, stormwater management and control and storm water reuse, rain gardens, and irrigation friendly landscaping. He spoke about the TDM plan. He spoke about how wellness has been incorporated into the building design. He said when 10 West End is built it will not create any interference with iHeart Media radio signal transmission, based on the tower orientation at the 1550 building. There may be some potential signal interruption when 20 West End, the second phase office building, is built. Commissioner Carper asked if there would be any exterior eating spaces. Mr. Barranco said there will be an elevated patio area with outdoor café seating sections on the south side of Central Park West. There will also be some additional tables in the lobby. In response to Commissioner Robertson’s question about potential tenants Mr. Barranco said marketing feedback has been very good. They hope to have an anchor tenant in 60- 90 days. Vice Chair Peilen opened the public hearing. As no one was present wishing to speak she closed the public hearing. Commissioner Carper said it is an excellent project and he appreciates the applicant taking time to meet with the Commission in a study session. Commissioner Carper made a motion to recommend approval of the Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development and Preliminary and Final Plat. Commissioner Person seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a 5-0 vote. C. Meadowbrook Manor Clubhouse – Conditional Use Permit Location: 6922-6932 Meadowbrook Blvd. Applicant: Sambetek, Inc. Case No.: 16-24-CUP Jennifer Monson, Planner, stated the request is for a conditional use permit for construction of a clubhouse, swimming pool, ten surface parking spaces, detention pond, and significant landscape additions. The construction will require demolition of the existing six-unit townhome building. She explained that the complex was originally constructed prior to the conditional use permit requirement and it has been a legal non- City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 4i) Page 4 Title: Planning Commission Meeting Minutes July 20, 2016 conforming development within the city. The request for a CUP will bring the overall property closer to compliance with current zoning standards. Commissioner Robertson commented that the 7 a.m. weekend construction start time is earlier than code allows. Commissioner Carper asked if there was a pass-through trail on the property. Ms. Monson said the trail access along Minnehaha Creek will continue. Commissioner Person asked if the streets within the complex are private. Ms. Monson replied that they are city streets and are maintained by the city. Eric Miller, Sambetek, said their intent is to comply with the city’s ordinance on construction hours. He answered questions about the storm sewer system. Commissioner Carper asked if there were any dog walking areas. He asked if there was any space for resident garden plots. Mr. Miller said the site is fairly open with ample space for dog walking. Ted Bigos, owner, said there are no existing garden plots and no plans for them. He said there has been no demand for them. Vice Chair Peilen opened the public hearing. No one was present to speak and she closed the public hearing. Sean Walther, Planning and Zoning Supervisor, stated that weekend construction start time is 9 a.m. Commissioner Robertson made a motion recommending approval of the Conditional Use Permit with an amendment to weekend construction start time. Commissioner Carper seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 5-0. D. Zoning Ordinance Amendment pertaining to Fences, Sheds and Signs Applicant: City of St. Louis Park Case No.: 16-28-ZA Gary Morrison, Assistant Zoning Administrator, presented the staff report. He explained the amendment proposes to establish and clarify materials that can be used to construct a fence; update the maximum size accessory building that can be constructed without a building permit; increase the size maximum allowed for signs in the R-4 Multiple-Family Residence district; and decrease the minimum setback required for signs at schools, community centers, libraries, religious institutions, and other similar uses. Commissioner Robertson spoke about the requirement that the finished side of a fence must face neighboring properties. He said the exception to that where it looks unsightly is City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 4i) Page 5 Title: Planning Commission Meeting Minutes July 20, 2016 a wood frame fence with chain link on it. He said he’d like to see a way to address that situation. Commissioner Carper said he was concerned about some fence materials which are excluded such as bamboo and reed. If maintained properly and replaced regularly those materials can be aesthetically pleasing. He discussed a pole type of fence. He said he wasn’t sure about the definition of a rigid plastic fence or if flexible material was not considered acceptable. Mr. Morrison said he had included language such as “other naturally decay resistant wood” for alternative materials. Bamboo would hopefully fall into that category. He said he wasn’t sure about reed. He said maintenance is obviously an issue. The zoning ordinance comes into play when a fence becomes structurally unsound. He said he wasn’t sure what the commissioner meant by a pole fence. He said proposed language was to differentiate rigid plastic fences from snow fences. Commissioner Tatalovich asked why there is a minimum gage requirement on chain link fences. Mr. Morrison said that was for structural integrity and safety. Vice Chair Peilen opened the public hearing. No one was present to speak and she closed the public hearing. Commissioner Carper stated he was uncomfortable with proposed wording regarding exceptions to materials. He said he wasn’t confident that enforcement would be consistent. Commissioners discussed tabling the fence portion of the ordinance for further discussion. Commissioner Robertson made a motion to recommend approval of the Zoning Ordinance amendment pertaining to sheds and signs; and to table the fence portion for further discussion. Commissioner Tatalovich seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 5-0. Commissioner Carper stated he would like to discuss hedge height as part of the fence discussion. E. Temporary Health Care Dwellings – Zoning Ordinance Amendment Applicant: City of St. Louis Park Case No.: 16-27-ZA Gary Morrison, Assistant Zoning Administrator, presented the staff report. He explained the amendment and background which would declare the city’s decision to opt-out of Minnesota Statutes Section 462.3593 Temporary Health Care Dwellings. Commissioner Robertson commented that the intent of the law is excellent but the execution falls short and he agrees whole-heartedly to opt out. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 4i) Page 6 Title: Planning Commission Meeting Minutes July 20, 2016 Vice Chair Peilen opened the hearing. As no one was present wishing to speak she closed the public hearing. Commissioner Carper made a motion recommending approval of the Zoning Ordinance Amendment to opt-out of Minnesota Statutes Section 462.3593 which defines and regulates Temporary Family Health Care Dwellings. Commissioner Person seconded the motion and the motion passed on a vote of 5-0. 4. Other Business Mr. Walther discussed the option of electronic agenda packets which are available on the city’s website. Commissioner Carper requested that staff initiate a study session discussion on the desirability of gardens being mandated as a part of DORA in apartment applications in the future. He said it might be feasible to reduce the DORA requirement if gardens are provided. He said gardens are in demand in the community with the interest in sustainable living. Mr. Walther suggested that the Commissioners could discuss that idea at a future study session. 5. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 8:12 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Nancy Sells Recording Secretary Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: August 15, 2016 Public Hearing Agenda Item: 6a EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: St. Louis Park Liquor – Off Sale Intoxicating Liquor License (Ownership Change) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Mayor to open and close public hearing. Motion to approve application from Kevin Tran dba St. Louis Park Liquor for an Off-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for the premises located at 6316 Minnetonka Boulevard, for the license term ending March 1, 2017. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the Council wish to approve the liquor license for Kevin Tran dba St. Louis Park Liquor located at 6316 Minnetonka Boulevard? SUMMARY: The City received an application from Kevin Tran for an Off-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for the premises located at 6316 Minnetonka Boulevard. Mr. Tran will be the new sole owner and store manager of St. Louis Park Liquor, an existing off-sale liquor establishment. The licensed premises is not proposed to change and will continue to be approximately 1,200 square feet in size. The applicant provided proof of liquor liability insurance with his license application. The Police Department conducted a full background investigation, and nothing was discovered that would warrant denial of the license. The application and police report are on file in the City Clerk’s office, should Council members wish to review the information. The required notice of the public hearing was published August 4, 2016. Should Council approve the liquor license, no actual license will be issued until all requirements have been met with the State Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Fees for this applicant include $500 for the police background investigation and $380 annually for the Off-Sale Liquor License. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: None. Prepared by: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Reviewed by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director Approved by: Tom Harmening , City Manager Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: August 15, 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Parkway 25 - Public Hearing and First Reading of Ordinance Vacating Drainage and Utility Easements RECOMMENDED ACTION: Mayor to open the public hearing, take public testimony, and then close the hearing. Motion to approve First Reading of an Ordinance vacating drainage utility easements and set the Second Reading of Ordinance for September 6, 2016 (five affirmative votes required). POLICY CONSIDERATION: Are the drainage utility easements needed for public purposes? SUMMARY: The Parkway 25 redevelopment site is located at 4001 and 4025 Highway 7. The redevelopment proposal includes a preliminary and final plat that will combine two parcels into one parcel, and a preliminary and final planned unit development (PUD) for a mixed use development including 111 residential units and approximately 8,500 square feet of commercial space. Final plat and final PUD actions are on the City Council’s agenda this evening. The proposed site design includes several encroachments into existing drainage utility easements. In order for the proposed development to proceed, these easements need to be vacated. The applicant requests the City vacate drainage utility easements for the properties legally described as Lot 2, Block 1, Thomas O. Heggen’s Addition and Lot 3, Block 1, Thomas O. Heggen’s Addition. The development plan proposes using this easement area for an underground storm water management system, underground parking, and building improvements. As part of the preliminary and final plat process, the applicant is proposing two new drainage utility easements that better suit the site and development, and maintain the City’s interests for ongoing easements. Depictions of the easements to be vacated are included in the attached ordinance. Assuming the first reading is approved, the second reading of the ordinance will be scheduled for September 6, 2016. Note that if the Council does not approve the plat and PUD applications being considered later on the same meeting agenda, the second reading of the vacation ordinance on September 6 can be delayed or canceled. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Draft Ordinance Prepared by: Nicole Mardell, Associate Planner Reviewed by: Sean Walther, Planning & Zoning Supervisor Michele Schnitker, Deputy CD Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Public Hearing Agenda Item: 6b City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 6b) Page 2 Title: Parkway 25 - Public Hearing and First Reading of Ordinance Vacating Drainage and Utility Easements ORDINANCE NO.____-16 AN ORDINANCE VACATING DRAINAGE UTILITY EASEMENTS ON THE PROPERTY OF 4001 AND 4025 HIGHWAY 7 THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK DOES ORDAIN: Section 1. A petition in writing signed by a majority of all of the owners of all property abutting the easements proposed to be vacated has been duly filed. The notice of said petition has been published in the St. Louis Park Sailor on August 4, 2016 and the City Council has conducted a public hearing upon said petition and has determined that the drainage utility easements are not needed for public purposes, and that it is for the best interest of the public that said drainage and utility easements be vacated. Section 2. The easements described in Exhibit “A”, and depicted on Exhibits “B” and “C”, as now dedicated and laid out within the corporate limits of the City of St. Louis Park are vacated. Section 3. The City Clerk is instructed to record certified copies of this ordinance in the Office of the Hennepin County Register of Deeds or Registrar of Titles as the case may be. Section_4. This Ordinance shall take effect upon recording of the final plat, but not less than fifteen days after its publication. Public Hearing August 15, 2016 First Reading August 15, 2016 Second Reading September 6, 2016 Date of Publication September 16, 2016 Date Ordinance takes effect October 3, 2016 Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council September 6, 2016 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Approved as to Form and Execution: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Soren Mattick, City Attorney City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 6b) Page 3 Title: Parkway 25 - Public Hearing and First Reading of Ordinance Vacating Drainage and Utility Easements EXHIBIT “A” LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS The following are the legal descriptions of the easements to be vacated: All of the Drainage and Utility Easement as dedicated in Lot 3, Block 1, Thomas O. Heggen’s Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. All of the Drainage and Utility Easement as dedicated in Lot 2, Block 1, Thomas O. Heggen’s Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 6b) Page 4 Title: Parkway 25 - Public Hearing and First Reading of Ordinance Vacating Drainage and Utility Easements EXHIBIT “B” City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 6b) Page 5 Title: Parkway 25 - Public Hearing and First Reading of Ordinance Vacating Drainage and Utility Easements EXHIBIT “C” Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: August 15, 2016 Action Agenda Item: 8a EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Master Marketing Agreement – Discover St. Louis Park and City of Golden Valley RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to approve and ratify the Master Marketing Agreement between Discover St. Louis Park (DSLP) and the City of Golden Valley. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Is the approach used in the Master Marketing Agreement in the best interests of the City of St. Louis Park? SUMMARY: On January 11, 2016 representatives of DSLP discussed with the Council the City of Golden Valley’s interest in forming some type of relationship with DSLP for assistance in marketing the assets in their community. At that time the Council expressed concerns about DSLP possibly losing its identity as a result of such a relationship. In the end the Council expressed cautious interest and as stated in the meeting minutes, “It was the consensus of the City Council to encourage Discover St. Louis Park to move forward in exploring the partnership with Golden Valley.” Since that time conversations have continued between the two parties resulting in the creation of a mutually acceptable document called a Master Marketing Agreement. This agreement requires the approval of the City Council. The City Attorney has reviewed and signed off on this agreement. Some provisions in the agreement of note include:  One year term with a provision for termination and extensions  Requires Golden Valley to create a lodging tax to be forwarded to DSLP  DSLP agrees to undertake certain marketing services for Golden Valley  Golden Valley may appoint one none-voting representative to the DSLP board.  DSLP will continue to retain its name and brand. The Chair and Executive Director of DSLP will be in attendance at the Council meeting. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Master Marketing Agreement Prepared by: Tom Harmening, City Manager MASTER MARKETING AGREEMENT This Master Marketing Agreement (the “ Agreement”) is entered into as of ______________________, 201_, (the “Effective Date”) by and between St. Louis Park Convention and Visitors Bureau, a Minnesota non-profit corporation (“DSLP”) and the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota (“Golden Valley”). DSLP and Golden Valley are sometimes referred to as a “Party” and collectively referred to as the “Parties”. R E C I T A L S WHEREAS, DSLP is organized as a non-profit destination marketing organization pursuant to Minn. Stat. §469.190 and is funded pursuant to statute by tax revenues levied and collected by the City of St. Louis Park from hoteliers in the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, the revenues being used for the purpose of advertising, marketing, and sales for the City of St. Louis Park, its businesses, and its various stakeholders; and WHEREAS, Golden Valley has no similar destination marketing organization but seeks to engage in advertising, marketing and sales activities similar to those conducted by DSLP, for the benefit of the City of Golden Valley, its businesses, and its own various stakeholders; and WHEREAS, the Parties have identified certain assets each City holds that mutually further the interests of the Parties to effectuate their respective advertising, marketing and sales goals; and WHEREAS, Golden Valley has expressed an interest in accessing DSLP’s resources, staff and expertise to assist Golden Valley in its advertising, marketing and sales activities; and DSLP with the approval of its municipality authority, The City of St. Louis Park, is agreeable to provide certain resources, services, staff and expertise to Golden Valley (referred to in this Agreement as “Marketing Activities,” and defined below) in exchange for specified funding contributions to DSLP from Golden Valley; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and understandings hereinafter set forth, the Parties hereby agree as follows: A G R E E M E N T 1. Conditions Precedent. The Parties’ rights, interests, and obligations under this Agreement, are subject to and contingent upon the satisfaction of each of the following conditions: (a) Golden Valley Lodging Tax. Within six (6) months of the Effective Date of this Agreement, and pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 469.190, Golden Valley must approve and enact legislation approving the collection of tax revenue from its hoteliers (the “Tax Revenue”). Golden Valley shall further agree to payment of these tax proceeds to DSLP, less all statutory permissible administrative fees and costs retained by Golden Valley. (b) City Approval. The municipal city councils of the Cities of Golden Valley and St. Louis Park, respectively, must each approve and ratify this Agreement. (c) Pre-Legislation Activities. DSLP may takes steps in preparation for, and in anticipation of Golden Valley’s enactment of the legislation in Paragraph 1(a). No such preparation or work by DSLP shall be construed to be “Marketing Activities,” or otherwise be considered a waiver by DSLP or the conditions precedent set forth in Paragraph 1(a) and 1(b) above. Any such preparation or work by DSLP prior to Golden Valley’s enactment of the legislation and actual receipt of Tax Revenue shall be done City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Title: Master Marketing Agreement – Discover St. Louis Park and City of Golden Valley Page 2 solely at DSLP’s volition, and shall not constitute an acceptance of any terms in this Agreement until the conditions precedent are fully satisfied. 2. Term. The term of this Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date, and shall continue for a period of one (1) year (the “Term”). Unless otherwise terminated pursuant to Paragraph 12 herein, this Agreement shall renew automatically at the end of the Term for additional one (1) year periods. 3. Remittance of Tax Revenue. Golden Valley shall remit all Tax Revenue to DSLP, less all reasonable administration fees on or near the 15th day of each month during the Term. 4. Exclusivity of Marketing Activity on behalf of Golden Valley. Golden Valley agrees that DSLP shall be the sole recipient of Tax Revenue, less all statutory permissible administrative fees and costs, and that DSLP shall be the only authorized entity to conduct Marketing Activity on behalf of Golden Valley as funded by the Tax Revenue. 5. Marketing Activity. DSLP shall furnish services to Golden Valley to the extent reasonably allowable within the Tax Revenue received, which shall include, but is not limited to: (a) Information services in the form of responding to inquiries about Golden Valley, its hotels, businesses, city assets, parks, and recreational facilities, via U.S. Mail, social media/computer (internet), advertising, telephone, wireless devices, and personal contacts; (b) Provide planning and coordination to organizations, business and groups to further the interests of Golden Valley assets; (c) Incorporate Golden Valley into the support materials, including but not limited to promotional brochures, accommodations lists, website(s) and other marketing or event information in general; (d) Prepare and present presentations to groups to attract visitors, meetings, convention and special events to Golden Valley and the area; (e) Distribute applicable brochures and guides of Golden Valley to potential visitors, businesses, and to meeting and event planners; (f) Representation of Golden Valley at trade shows, conventions, and exhibits to attract new visitors to Golden Valley; and (g) Promote Golden Valley as a destination through area, statewide, regional, national and international advertising and marketing of Golden Valley and the area’s hospitality industry and attractions. 6. Proportional Activities and Funding. DSLP shall promote Golden Valley through the above Marketing Activity at its reasonable discretion, and solely to the extent services can be provided from the Tax Revenue received by DSLP. The expenses for all such promotion(s) shall be allocated proportionally based upon the tax revenues received from both cities by DSLP. 7. City Designee. Golden Valley shall nominate one representative to serve as an advisory member to DSLP (the “City Designee”). The City Designee shall represent the Golden Valley at all meetings of DSLP. The City Designee shall offer input on any and all Marketing Activity coordinated for the benefit of Golden City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Title: Master Marketing Agreement – Discover St. Louis Park and City of Golden Valley Page 3 Valley, however, the City Designee shall not have a formal position as a director of DSLP, shall have no voting rights, and shall in no instance be deemed an employee of DSLP. 8. Verification of Expenses. Each year, DSLP will provide Golden Valley with a copy of DSLP’s audited annual financial statements (the “Financial Statements”). The Financial Statements shall summarize the monthly financials containing allocated expenses for Marketing Activity separately for Golden Valley. The City Designee shall have the right to access the official financial books and organizational records of DSLP at any time during normal business hours, provided forty-eight (48) hours notification to DSLP’s president or treasurer, to audit any items of revenue or expenditure. 9. Insurance and Additional Insured (a) Golden Valley shall carry insurance to cover its employees and agents while performing services pursuant to this Agreement. Such insurance shall provide comprehensive general liability, automobile liability insurance, and property damage coverage to DSLP and its employees and agents in such amounts as will equal the applicable limits or liability to which Golden Valley may be held pursuant to state statute, as the same may be amended from time to time. Golden Valley shall also carry workers’ compensation liability insurance as required by Minnesota statute, and provide DSLP with proof of compliance with this paragraph.The insurance procured by Golden Valley shall name The City of St. Louis Park, the St. Louis Park Visitor’s and Convention Bureau, and Discover St. Louis Park as “additional insureds” on their policies. To the fullest extent possible, the parties and their insurers agree to waive subrogation rights against each other. (b) DSLP shall carry insurance to cover its employees and agents while performing services pursuant to this Agreement. Such insurance shall provide comprehensive general liability, automobile liability insurance, and property damage coverage to Golden Valley and its employees and agents in such amounts as will equal or exceed the applicable limits or liability to which Golden Valley may be held pursuant to state statute, as the same may be amended from time to time. DSLP shall also carry workers’ compensation liability insurance as required by Minnesota statute, and provide Golden Valley with proof of compliance with this paragraph. The insurance procured by DSLP shall name Golden Valley as “additional insureds” on their policies. 10. Assignment. Neither this Agreement nor the rights or obligations hereunder shall be assigned or delegated, in whole or in part, by either of the Parties to any other third party or entity without the prior wr itten consent thereto by the other Party. Any attempted assignment or assignment of the rights or obligations of any Party, in contravention of this Section, shall be null and void. All references in this Agreement to the Parties shall be deemed to include, as applicable, a reference to their respective permitted successors and assigns. 11. Mutual Indemnification and Hold Harmless. Each Party shall hold harmless, and indemnify the other Party and its directors, officers, agents, and employees against any and al l liability, loss, penalty, fine, action, damage, claim, expense, including reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs, to the extent caused by the respective Parties’ negligence, fault, act or omission, and breaches of duties, under this Agreement, and for actions, damages, claims, expense, and attorneys’ fees/costs brought by third person(s) and corporations for whom the respective party is legally liable that arise from this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, neither party shall be obligated to indemnify the other party in any manner whatsoever for that party’s own negligence, fault, act or omission under this Agreement. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Title: Master Marketing Agreement – Discover St. Louis Park and City of Golden Valley Page 4 12. Termination. Either party may terminate this agreement at any time by providing the other party sixty (60) days written notice evidencing termination. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Agreement shall automatically terminate in the event that Golden Valley revokes or rescinds any ordinance or municipal tax levy which would eliminate the Tax Revenue funding Golden Valley’s contribution to this Agreement. Within sixty days of the termination of this Agreement, DLSP shall refund any outstanding Tax Revenue in its possession to Golden Valley. 13. Default. Subject to Section 12, in the event of a default or material breach of any performance or obligation under this Agreement, the non-breaching Party shall provide written notice evidencing the breach of this Agreement within ten (10) days of the material breach or default. The breaching party shall have ten (10) days from receipt of the notice to cure the default before the non-breaching party is entitled to commence any action for breach of this Agreement. 14. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the Parties’ entire understanding as to its subject matter and supersedes all prior agreements, written or oral, between the Parties relating thereto. 15. Modification. This Agreement (and any sschedules thereto) may be supplemented, amended, or modified only by the mutual agreement of the Parties, and such agreement must be in writing, dated and signed by both Parties. All such written modifications must be approved by vote of the Board of Directors of DSLP and the Golden Valley City Council. 16. Notice. Any notice or other communication provided for herein or given hereunder to a Party hereto shall be in writing and shall be given in person, by overnight courier, by mail (registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return-receipt requested) or by electronic mail to the respective Parties as follows: DSLP: Attention: Address: Phone: Fax: Email: Golden Valley: Attention: Address: Phone: Fax: Email: 17. Governing Law; Forum; Mandatory Mediation. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota without regard to its conflict of law principles. No action by way of litigation of any dispute under this Agreement shall take place prior to mediation of the dispute with a mediator of the parties’ City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Title: Master Marketing Agreement – Discover St. Louis Park and City of Golden Valley Page 5 mutual choice. Any legal action arising from or relating to this Agreement shall be venued in the Fourth Judicial District of the Minnesota Courts, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and the Parties hereby consent to the personal jurisdiction of the Court. 18. Severability. Whenever possible, each provision of this Agreement will be interpreted in such manner as to be effective and valid under applicable law, but if any provision of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect under any applicable law or rule in any jurisdiction, such invalidity, illegality, or unenforceability will not affect any other provision or any other jurisdiction, but this Agreement will be reformed, construed, and enforced in such jurisdiction as if such invalid, illegal, or unenforceable provisions had never been contained herein. 19. No Joint Venture/Agent Relationship; Independent Contractor. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to (1) create a joint venture, partnership, or other shared enterprise between the Parties, or (2) authorize either party to act as an agent for or on behalf of the other part y. DSLP shall at all times be acting in the capacity as an independent contractor of destination marketing services for Golden Valley. DSLP shall have no legal liability for employment, payroll, tax, or workers’ compensation liability for Golden Valley, its employees, the City Designee or the City Designee’s acts/omissions. 20. Third Parties. Nothing in this Agreement express or implied is intended to confer any right or remedy under or by any reason of this Agreement on any person other than the Parties, th eir respective heirs, representatives, successors and permitted assigns, affect or discharge their obligation or liability of any third persons to any Party to this Agreement, or give any third Party any right or subrogation or action over against any Party to this Agreement. 21. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original but all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. For purposes of this Agreement, use of a facsimile, e-mail, or other electronic medium shall have the same force and effect as an original signature. 22. Affirmation of the Parties; Waiver of Conflict of Interest. The Parties affirm that they have entered into this Agreement freely, voluntarily, and without reliance on any promises, representations, or other statements not contained in this Agreement and that they have read and understood this Agreement. The Parties further recognize that to the extent any Marketing Activity conflicts with the interests of the two Parties and their respective stakeholders, that the Parties mutually waive any such conflict of interest, with the goal that DSLP will make its best efforts to engage in Marketing Activities that jointly benefit the interests of both sets of stakeholders. The Mutual Indemnification and Hold Harmless provisions contained in paragraph 11 (above) apply to this paragraph. 23. Force Majeure. Neither party shall be liable to the other for any failure or delay to perform its obligations under this Agreement where such delay or failure is caused by natural hazard and/or disaster, labor unrest, riot, civil commotion, lockout, fire, flood, earthquake, typhoon, war, acts of foreign enemies, perils of the sea, or other perils and any cause or circumstance whatsoever beyond the control of either party. In any of these events the affected party shall, for the duration of such event, be temporarily relieved of its obligation impacted by the event. 24. Headings. Headings used in this Agreement are provided for convenience only and shall not be used to construe meaning or intent. [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS] City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Title: Master Marketing Agreement – Discover St. Louis Park and City of Golden Valley Page 6 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, authorized representatives of the parties hereto have executed this Master Marketing Agreement as of the Effective Date. St. Louis Park Convention and Visitors Bureau D/B/A Discover St. Louis Park By: ______________________________ Becky Bakken, President and CEO Its: ______________________________ Date: ____________________________ By: ______________________________ Doug McIntyre, Board Chair Its: ______________________________ Date: ____________________________ City of Golden Valley, Minnesota By: ______________________________ Tim Cruikshank, City Manager Its: ______________________________ Date: ____________________________ By: ______________________________ Shep Harris, Mayor Its: ______________________________ Date: ____________________________ City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Title: Master Marketing Agreement – Discover St. Louis Park and City of Golden Valley Page 7 Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: August 15, 2016 Action Agenda Item: 8b EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Ordinance Amending St. Louis Park City Code Chapter 3, Section 70 (g)(1) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to approve the first reading of an ordinance amending St. Louis Park City Code Chapter 3 , Section 70 (g)(1) to Exempt Congressionally Chartered Veterans Organizations Holding a Club Liquor License from the 50% Food Ratio Requirement and to schedule the second reading of the ordinance on September 6, 2016. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Should Congressionally Chartered Veterans Organizations holding a Club On-Sale liquor license be exempt from the requirement to have at least 50% of the establishment’s gross receipts attributable to the sale of food? SUMMARY: On May 9 and July 11, 2016 the City Council reviewed a request from Frank Lundberg American Legion Post 282 for consideration of an ordinance amendment that would formally exempt the holders of a Club On-Sale Intoxicating liquor license from the requirement that at least 50% of the gross receipts of the establishment be attributable to the sale of food. At that time the Council directed staff to draft an ordinance amendment that would specifically exempt Congressionally Chartered Veterans Organizations holding a Club liquor license from the food ratio requirement because their establishments are meant to serve as places for members of the organization to congregate socially. Patrons of these establishments are required to be either members of the organization or guests of members, and food and alcohol sales are incidental to the overall purpose of the organization. The American Legion was chartered and incorporated by Congress in 1919 as a patriotic veterans organization devoted to mutual helpfulness. It is a nonpartisan, not-for-profit organization whose success depends entirely on active membership, participation and volunteerism. The American Legion currently holds Club On-Sale and On-Sale Sunday liquor licenses. Minnesota Statute 340A.404, Subd. 1(a)(4) allows cities to issue an on-sale intoxicating liquor license to “clubs or congressionally chartered veterans organizations with the approval of the commissioner, provided that the organization has been in existence for at least three years and liquor sales will only be to members and bona fide guests”. NEXT STEPS: September 6, 2016 – Second Reading of Ordinance September 15, 2016 – Publication of Summary Ordinance September 30, 2016 – Ordinance Effective Date FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: None. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance M.S. 340A.101 – Definition of “Club” Letter from Frank Lundberg American Legion Post 282 Prepared by: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Page 2 Title: Ordinance Amending St. Louis Park City Code Chapter 3, Section 70 (g)(1) ORDINANCE NO.____-16 ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 3, SECTION 70 (g) TO EXEMPT CONGRESSIONALLY CHARTERED VETERANS’ ORGANIZATIONS HOLDING A CLUB LIQUOR LICENSE FROM THE 50% FOOD RATIO REQUIREMENT THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK DOES ORDAIN: SECTION 1. Chapter 3 is amended as follows: ARTICLE II. SALE, CONSUMPTION AND DISPLAY *** Sec. 3-70 Ineligibility. *** (g) No on-sale intoxicating liquor license, except a club license for a congressionally chartered veterans’ organization, shall be issued unless at 50 percent of the gross receipts of the establishment will be attributable to the sale of food. This requirement shall be regulated as follows: (1) Each on-sale intoxicating liquor licensee, except a congressionally chartered veterans’ organization holding a club license, shall have the continuing obligation to have at least 50 percent of gross receipts from the establishment during the preceding business year attributable to the sale of food. SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall take effect fifteen days after its passage and publication. First Reading August 15, 2016 Second Reading September 6, 2016 Date of Publication September 15, 2016 Date Ordinance takes effect September 30, 2016 ADOPTED this 6th day of September, 2016 by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park. Reviewed for Administration: ____________________________________ Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Adopted by the City Council September 6, 2016 ______________________________________ Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: ____________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Approved as to form and execution: ______________________________________ Soren Mattick, City Attorney City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Page 3 Title: Ordinance Amending St. Louis Park City Code Chapter 3, Section 70 (g)(1) 2015 Minnesota Statutes 340A.101 DEFINITIONS. Subd. 7. Club. "Club" is an incorporated organization organized under the laws of the state for civic, fraternal, social, or business purposes, for intellectual improvement, or for the promotion of sports, or a congressionally chartered veterans' organization, which: (1) has more than 30 members; (2) has owned or rented a building or space in a building for more than one year that is suitable and adequate for the accommodation of its members; (3) is directed by a board of directors, executive committee, or other similar body chosen by the members at a meeting held for that purpose. No member, officer, agent, or employee shall receive any profit from the distribution or sale of beverages to the members of the club, or their guests, beyond a reasonable salary or wages fixed and voted each year by the governing body. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Title: Ordinance Amending St. Louis Park City Code Chapter 3, Section 70 (g)(1)Page 4 Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: August 15, 2016 Action Agenda Item: 8c EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Consulting Services for Community Visioning Initiative RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to direct Staff to negotiate a final contract and scope of work with Next Generation Consulting for St. Louis Parks Community Visioning process and authorize execution of the contract by the City Manager and Mayor. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish to contract with Next Generation Consulting to assist with updating the City’s Vision over the next 8-10 months? SUMMARY: In June the Council and Staff discussed the process for updating St. Louis Park’s Vision and Comprehensive Plan. The first step was to investigate and identify a consultant or consultants to help us with the Visioning process as a means to inform the preparation of the Comprehensive Plan. The goal is to have a consultant on board by the end of the summer and to begin the Visioning update process this fall. At the August 1 City Council Study Session, the City Council directed staff to work with Next Generation Consulting group to create a work scope and contract. The original proposal is attached; it is expected the work plan and scope will be refined and incorporated into a contract for the work. The process and scope of work will build on the approach presented to the Council and the feedback received. NEXT STEPS: A refined work scope will be written and incorporated into a contract for the City Manager’s and Mayor’s signatures. It is expected the consultant could begin work in September. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The Vision process will require financial resources from the city. While the exact amount of the contract is yet to be determined, it is expected to be in the range of $100,000 to $150,000. The source of funding is the Development Fund VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged community. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion Next Generation Consulting Proposal Prepared by: Meg J. McMonigal, Principal Planner Reviewed by: Kevin Locke, Community Development Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8c) Page 2 Title: Consulting Services for Community Visioning Initiative DISCUSSION VISION BACKGROUND: The City conducted major community visioning processes in 1995 and 2005. The outcomes of these processes provide a very strong basis for the community’s direction – and these directions have provided a solid foundation of goals and policies that have served the community (and the city government) very well for the past 20+ years. Updating our Vision will build on the foundation created through the earlier Visioning efforts. The directions chosen in past processes continue to be important and relevant. New initiatives and directions will be identified in the update process. They will be incorporated into the Vision and the City’s Plan for 2040. NEXT GENERATION: Information on Rebecca Ryan and Next Generation Consulting: Rebecca Ryan is a human sparkplug. Part futurist, part economist, and always engaging, Rebecca is one of America’s most influential thought leaders, helping cities and companies think around the corner to what’s next. Rebecca Ryan is the author of ReGENERATION: A Manifesto for America’s Future Leaders (2013) and Live First, Work Second: Getting Inside the Head of the Next Generation (2007). As founder of Next Generation Consulting, Ryan leads the team that best-selling author Richard Florida calls, “One of the most reliable sources for leaders who want to attract and retain the next generation of creative workers. Ryan is the Resident Futurist at the Alliance for Innovation and a Senior Fellow at CEOs for Cities. She serves on the board of the World Academy for Entrepreneurship & Enterprise (WAE2) and has also been named: - Top 100 Most Influential People, Accounting Today - Communicator of the Year, Women in Communication - Woman of Influence, Business Journal of Greater Milwaukee - Entrepreneur of the Year, U.S. Association for Small Business and Entrepreneurship http://www.rebeccaryan.com/ NEXT STEPS: The next steps for the Vision process will be: Summer/Fall  Complete work scope and contract for Visioning  Develop detailed community engagement process  Develop branding and communications plan for the effort  Organize internal/interdepartmental teams  Begin informing the community about the influence the previous Vision processes have had on the community and the progress toward the goals and priorities previously identified.  Begin promoting Vision engagement process  Begin Vision engagement Future Forward >> St. Louis Park Community Engagement and Forecasting Proposal | Draft July 15, 2016
 City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8c) Title: Consulting Services for Community Visioning Initiative Page 3 CONTENTS Project Overview 3 ................................................................................................................................... Work Plan 4 ................................................................................................................................................ Stage 0: Prepare for Success 4 ..................................................................................................... Stage 1: Community Engagement 4 ................................................................................................. Stage 2: Forecast 6 ........................................................................................................................... Stage 3: Synthesize 7 ........................................................................................................................ Stage 4: Review Results with Steering Committee, Council, & Staff 7 ..................................... Stage 5: From Vision to Plan 8 ........................................................................................................ Stage 6: Launch and Execute 9 ........................................................................................................ Meet the Team 10 ..................................................................................................................................... Timing …….. 12 ............................................................................................................................................ Joint Accountabilities 12 ......................................................................................................................... Investment, Terms & Conditions 13 ....................................................................................................... References 14 ........................................................................................................................................... 2 City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8c) Title: Consulting Services for Community Visioning Initiative Page 4 PROJECT OVERVIEW Future Forward >> St. Louis Park includes these goals: 1 1. Engage the broadest possible cross-section of St. Louis Park residents — especially those who are traditionally underrepresented — in a dialogue about the future of their community; 2. Develop a dynamic and ambitious plan (including vision and focus areas) that will make St. Louis Park an even better place to live, work, and play now and in the future; 3. Align the results of Future Forward with the City of St. Louis Park’s next comprehensive plan Future Forward >> St. Louis Park is the name we’re giving this project. The Steering Committee, City Council or 1 City of St. Louis Park staff can suggest other options. 3 City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8c) Title: Consulting Services for Community Visioning Initiative Page 5 WORK PLAN To meet these goals, we recommend the following seven-stage work plan. Stage 0: Prepare for Success Before the Future Forward >> St. Louis Park is publicly launched, we recommend: 1. The City and Council choose a group of community representatives to serve on the Future Forward steering committee. Ideally, this committee would be generationally diverse, ethnically diverse, and diverse according to sector, i.e. nonprofit, business, civic, etc. 2. City Council and staff have an opportunity to review and discuss the Future Forward work plan (this document) with the consultants and project staff; 3. The City appoints a liaison to work day to day with the project manager from the NEXT Generation Consulting, Inc. staff; 4. The Future Forward Steering Committee meets in person with the consultants and project staff to agree on founding principles, e.g. Transparency, Inclusion, and Future- mindedness, and begin planning for a successful project. Special emphasis is made on identifying and engaging traditionally underrepresented groups. 5. Consultants and project staff determine the project’s communication plan. This includes deadlines for the Park Perspective; an engagement plan for Facebook, Twitter, Park Alert and other online outlets, and media plans for the Sun-Sailor, Star Tribune, and Pioneer Press as appropriate. Stage 1: Community Engagement This stage generally includes a lot of community “buzz”, staff time, and logistics planning. We recommend two methods to reach the goals of including all residents, especially those who are traditionally under-represented: Strategy 1: They Come to Us 1. A series of short online surveys and open-ended questions delivered through the City of St. Louis Park’s email and text subscription service; 2. Using the City’s Facebook page to publish questions and meeting details for followers who may be interested in participating in Future Forward. 4 City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8c) Title: Consulting Services for Community Visioning Initiative Page 6 3. Town Hall Meetings. These meetings are open to the public and are terrific for those who are tuned into the City and have the interest and time to show up for a public meeting. Strategy 2: Targeted Outreach - We Go To Them To reach residents who aren’t fans of the City’s Facebook page and who don’t normally show up to public forums, we recommend a series of special listening sessions targeted based on demographic trends in St. Louis Park. Based on past clients, these groups are often under-represented: Children, e.g. middle and/or high school students Members of specific faith communities, e.g. Jewish, Muslim, etc. Members of the specific ethnic communities, e.g. Russian, Latino, etc. Residents who live in affordable housing Young professionals who live or work in St. Louis Park but are unlikely to attend meetings Parents of school-aged children who are too busy to attend meetings, e.g. hockey moms Senior citizens who no longer drive or do limited driving Beyond listening sessions, a passive way to elicit input is the “One Wish” chalkboards (see photo on the next page). These may be loaned and shipped from Willmar, or new 5 City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8c) Title: Consulting Services for Community Visioning Initiative Page 7 chalkboards can be built on-site in St. Louis Park. The great benefit of these chalkboards is that they are mobile and can be taken around to different locations, e.g. the Aquatic Park in summer, National Night Out, to food truck fairs, and to other community festivals and events. Stage 2: Forecast In this stage, the NEXT Generation Consulting team scans for trends that are most likely to impact St. Louis Park in the next 20 years. We look at demographics, government, housing, technology, the economy, and more. We use data from MetCouncil, the US Census plus private or obscure databases to generate projections and scenarios for the future of St. Louis Park. 6 City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8c) Title: Consulting Services for Community Visioning Initiative Page 8 Stage 3: Synthesize Here, we take all the community input generated from Stage 1 and the forecasts from Stage 2 — plus pre-existing data, e.g. community surveys, the 2007 Vision St. Louis Park plan, etc. — and turn it into charts, tables, infographics, visualizations and pull- quotes to bring the data and recommendations to life. (See example at right from Eagan, MN plan.) Stage 4: Review Results with Steering Committee, Council, and Staff In this stage, NEXT Generation Consulting presents the key findings from Stages 1 through 3 to two groups: The Steering Committee, followed by a second, separate presentation to City Council and Staff. The Steering Committee will be asked: How do these insights align with what you heard during the community engagement process? Where is further clarification needed? What’s missing? Which ideas or recommendations have the most potential to transform St. Louis Park? Which ideas or recommendations do you want to prioritize for presentation to the City Council and Staff? 7 City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8c) Title: Consulting Services for Community Visioning Initiative Page 9 City Council and Staff will discuss the previous questions plus: Which ideas have unanimous support from Council and Staff? Which ideas or recommendations require Council support? Staff support? Community support? What is the natural timeline for implementing ideas and recommendations, e.g. next 12 months, next 36 months, etc.? In light of these results, is our current Vision and Mission still valid, or do they need tweaking? Stage 5: From Vision to Plan In this stage, we use the Strategic Doing process to move the vision and recommendations into the comprehensive plan and department plans for the City of St. Louis Park. 1. Janyce Fadden and NEXT Generation Consulting staff will facilitate a day-long workshop with the City of St. Louis Park staff to process the outcomes from Stage 4 into departmental plans. 2. Shai Roos and Brian Guenzel from SJR Planning Consultants will make a series of detailed recommendations for the City’s comprehensive plan. 3. (Optional) After the plans are developed, they will be shared with the City Council for review and discussion. 8 City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8c) Title: Consulting Services for Community Visioning Initiative Page 10 Stage 6: (Optional) Launch & Execute As of the date of this proposal, this stage is undefined. We strongly recommend that the City reports back to the community about the results of their input and plans the city is taking. This can be accomplished through the City’s website, the St. Louis Park Memo, or other outlets. If our assistance is needed, we will execute a separate agreement. 9 City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8c) Title: Consulting Services for Community Visioning Initiative Page 11 MEET THE TEAM The following people will play a role Future Forward >> St. Louis Park: Rebecca Ryan - Futurist Rebecca will serve as St. Louis Park’s futurist and will co-facilitate most steering committee and community meetings with Stephanie Ricketts (see below). Rebecca’s strengths are engaging and mobilizing stakeholders towards the project's vision. Rebecca is the author of The Next Big Things: The Next 20 Years in Local Government (2015); ReGENERATION: A Manifesto for America’s Future Leaders (2013); and Live First, Work Second: Getting Inside the Head of the NEXT Generation Consulting (2007). Described as a "human spark plug," she is the founder and owner of NEXT Generation Consulting, the Resident Futurist at the Alliance for Innovation, the Resident Futurist at AGRiP, and a Senior Advisor at the Governing Institute. Rebecca has degrees in Economics and International Relations from Drake University and a certificate in Strategic Foresight from the University of Houston. LinkedIn. Website. Stephanie Ricketts - Project Management Stephanie will serve as the Project Manager for Future Forward. She will handle all the day to day communication (including social media) and will keep the project on track. When she’s not helping St. Louis Park, Stephanie is our Camp Director and Community Builder. How does she get it all done? She’s organized! She has a graduate certificate in Sustainability from Edgewood College, a project management certificate from the University of Wisconsin and a Bachelor of Arts from the University of Wisconsin. LinkedIn. Website. Lisa Loniello - Support Lisa will be the backstop for Rebecca and Stephanie, helping as needed. Lisa is Rebecca’s right hand, coordinating her speaking and travel schedule. Before NEXT Generation Consulting, Lisa had 2,300 bosses - the members of the Greater Madison Chamber of Commerce! Lisa has a Bachelors degrees in Spanish from the University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh. Website. 10 City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8c) Title: Consulting Services for Community Visioning Initiative Page 12 Shai Roos - Planner Shai and Brian (below) will ensure that St. Louis Park’s vision and plans can be parlayed into its next comprehensive plan. Shai has over 17 years of public and private sector planning experience. She was a Chief Planner for the City of Dallas in both the Development Services and Economic Development departments. She also served as the Director of Community & Economic Development for the City of Burleson, TX. Before founding SJR Planning Consultants, Shai worked “on the other side” as a land developer for Walton Development and Management where she worked on land acquisition, entitlements and development strategy on 15,000 acres in the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex. Shai never rests; she teaches graduate level courses related to City planning, land development and redevelopment at the School of Urban and Public Affairs at UT Arlington. LinkedIn. Website. Brian Guenzel - Public Health & Built Environment Specialist Brian will work with Shai to ensure that St. Louis Park’s vision and plans can be parlayed into its next comprehensive plan. Brian has 13 years of experience in planning and public health, focused on empowering communities to actively participate in determining their own future. He believes that the hallmark of good planning and good governance is that the public doesn’t notice it! He compares this to his previous life in Hollywood, where good movie editing is invisible. LinkedIn. Website. Janyce Fadden - Strategic Doing Janyce will lead the Strategic Doing stage. Janyce is the Executive in Residence at the University of North Alabama’s College of Business and a Strategic Doing consultant, working with founder Ed Morrison at Purdue University’s Center for Regional Development. She previously served as President of the Rockford Area Economic Development Council in Rockford, Illinois and has experiences as President, Vice President, and General Manager for major multinational corporations including Honeywell, General Signal, Applied Power, Pacific Scientific, and Danaher. Janyce earned her Bachelors of Science in Engineering and Management from Clarkson University in Potsdam, New York, and her Masters of Business Administration from Northern Illinois University. LinkedIn. Website. 11 City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8c) Title: Consulting Services for Community Visioning Initiative Page 13 TIMING This project is estimated to begin in September or October 2016 and take six to nine months to complete, dependent on timelines and schedules. JOINT ACCOUNTABILITIES NEXT Generation Consulting Inc.’s accountabilities will include: signing and conforming with all nondisclosure and confidentiality agreements; professionally facilitating all interviews, town hall meetings, listening sessions, and Steering Committee meetings; designing and analyzing surveys; completing all forecasting processes; adhering to agreed upon deadlines; responding to requests and questions within one business day; and providing progress reports at agreed upon milestones. The City of St. Louis Park’s accountabilities will include: identifying and organizing the Future Forward >> St. Louis Park Steering Committee; identifying a liaison from the City staff for this project; providing NEXT Generation Consulting with access and introductions to all key staff, Council, and partners involved in this project; providing all information material to this project; taking photos and tabulating the “One Wish” chalkboard results; providing administrative support as needed to schedule on-site meetings; providing meeting space when needed; responding to inquiries and requests; and paying in conformance with the terms below. We will both alert each other immediately of anything we learn that may materially affect the success of this project. We will respect each other’s confidentiality and proprietary materials and approaches. We will achieve reasonable accommodation for conflicts, unforeseen events, and other priorities. We will work with a spirit of respect and collaboration. 12 City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8c) Title: Consulting Services for Community Visioning Initiative Page 14 INVESTMENT, TERMS & CONDITIONS This is a draft proposal, not an agreement. We estimate that the City of St. Louis Park’s investment in professional services for Future Forward >> St. Louis Park will range between $98,000 - $130,000 depending on the number of meetings and options chosen. We estimate an additional $6,000 - $9,000 in travel. A specific total will be estimated when a final proposal is requested. The following terms will also be presented in our final proposal: A five percent courtesy discount for professional services can be obtained with a single full-fee payment prior to work commencing. If the courtesy discount is not selected, the total for professional services will be billed in six equal monthly installments. Expenses will be billed monthly as accrued and are due on presentation of our invoice. Expenses include air, train, rental car, taxi, lodging, food, and related expenses; they will not include fax, copying, phone courier, office support, and related expenses. This project is non-cancelable for any reason. You may postpone and reschedule with our approval without penalty so long as you maintain the existing payment schedule. Additional work that falls beyond the terms of a final, signed proposal will be negotiated separately and may require amendments to a final agreement. The quality of our work is guaranteed. If our work is not consistent with the quality expressed in the accountabilities section, we will refund your full fee for work that is remaining. The estimates and timeframes included in this proposal are valid for 45 days, after which new estimates and timeframes may need to be negotiated due to client demand.
 13 City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8c) Title: Consulting Services for Community Visioning Initiative Page 15 REFERENCES This is a partial list of clients for whom we have completed similar Visioning and Forecasting projects. We would be happy to introduce you to anyone on this list: The Association of Government Risk Pools Charleston, South Carolina Cottage Grove, Minnesota (starting in September 2016) Eagan, Minnesota Local Government Institute of Wisconsin (in process) Minnetonka, Minnesota (in process) Northlake, Texas Southwest Louisiana The University of North Carolina School of Government Willmar, Minnesota 14 City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8c) Title: Consulting Services for Community Visioning Initiative Page 16 Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: August 15, 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to approve the Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) and Preliminary and Final Plat subject to conditions as recommended by staff and set the second reading of the PUD ordinance for September 6, 2016. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does City Council support the proposed PUD to allow for the Parkway 25 project. SUMMARY: Sela Group is requesting a Preliminary and Final PUD and Preliminary and Final Plat for redevelopment of the former Vescio’s restaurant (4001 Highway 7) and ValuStay Inn site (4025 Highway 7). The sites are proposed to be combined and developed into a five story, mixed- use building with 111 residential units, approximately 8,500 square feet of commercial space, and parking located in two surface lots and in an underground parking ramp. The unit mix includes; 45% 1 bedroom units, 39% 2 bedroom units, 14% 1+ bedroom units, and 2% studio units. The applicant is not seeking financial assistance from the City of St. Louis Park. The PUD is needed in order to increase the density of the development from 50 units per acre to 66.7 units per acre. The PUD also provides flexibility on the building setbacks. The PUD is 1.57 acres, and Council approval is needed for a PUD under two acres. Public input regarding this project has been received via a neighborhood meeting held on February 18, 2016. On July 20, the St. Louis Park Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the applications (minutes attached). FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis park is committed to providing a well-maintained and diverse housing stock. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion Existing and Proposed Zoning Draft Ordinance Draft Resolution Excerpt of Planning Commission Minutes Development Plans Traffic Study Prepared by: Nicole Mardell, Associate Planner Reviewed by: Sean Walther, Planning & Zoning Supervisor Michele Schnitker, Deputy CD Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Action Agenda Item: 8d City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8d) Page 2 Title: Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat DISCUSSION REQUEST: Sela Group is requesting a Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat, and vacation of drainage utility easements to construct a five story, mixed-use building. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The proposed redevelopment site lies south of County State Aid Highway 25 and west of Glenhurst Avenue. The property located at 4001 Highway 7 contains the former Vescio’s restaurant space. The restaurant closed in December of 2015 and currently sits vacant. The property located at 4025 Highway 7 contains the ValuStay Inn hotel built in 1951. SITE INFORMATION: Site Area: 1.574 acres Zoning: C-2 General Commercial Comprehensive Plan: Commercial Neighborhood: Triangle Current Use: Vacant restaurant, hotel Proposed Use: Apartments, commercial space Proposed Zoning: PUD – Planned Unit Development SITE LOCATION MAP: SURROUNDING LAND USES: North: County State Aid Highway 25 (CSAH 25) East: Glenhurst Avenue, 5-Story Mixed Use Building (Under Construction) South: 3-Story Multi-Family Residential, Single Family Home, City of St. Louis Park Lift Station West: Retail Strip Mall City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8d) Page 3 Title: Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat BACKGROUND: Parkway 25 is the redevelopment of the former Vescio’s restaurant and ValuStay Inn located at the southwest corner of CSAH 25 and Glenhurst Avenue. The applicant is proposing to combine the two properties into a 1.574 acre site to develop a mixed use building. The east wing of the building contains 3,500 gross square feet of commercial space planned to be a restaurant with outdoor patio seating. The west wing of the building contains 5,000 gross square feet of commercial space planned to be a fitness facility. In between the two commercial spaces are resident amenities and access to an open lobby. Ground floor residential units are located behind the commercial space with direct entrances to maintain an active “front door” presence. The development promotes biking through a large indoor bike storage area in the underground ramp and access to a bike repair station. The development includes a fenced outdoor dog run and dog washing station for pet owners. PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT ANALYSIS: Sela Group is seeking approval to combine the properties located at 4001 and 4025 Highway 7 in order to develop the proposed 5-story, 111 unit mixed use building and parking areas. The plat will be named Parkway 25 Addition. Lots Lot 1, Block 1 Parkway 25 Addition will have a lot area of 1.574 acres. This lot will be the location of the proposed Parkway 25 building. The proposed density for this site is 66.7 units/acre. Utility Easements Existing drainage and utility easements along the perimeters of the existing lots are proposed to be vacated as part of the Parkway 25 application. The applicant will retain any easements required by the city engineering department. The vacations will be a separate action, and City Council will hold a public hearing regarding the vacations on August 15, 2016. PUD ANALYSIS: Description The developer requests approval of a preliminary and final Planned Unit Development (PUD). A PUD is a rezoning and zoning text amendment that establishes the regulations for a specific property. Uses The proposed uses on site include 111 residential units, 3,500 gross square feet of restaurant space, and 5,000 gross square feet of fitness/yoga facility. Comprehensive Plan The Comprehensive Plan designates the site for commercial use. This category would allow for multifamily uses, provided commercial uses are also included. The proposed PUD would create a new zoning district and zoning regulations for uses and dimensional standards that are unique to this site and the proposed site and building plans. Staff finds that this site is suitable for the proposed mixed use development and meets many of the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. The site provides a mixture of market rate apartments while also providing ground floor commercial space promoting an active street frontage. The development provides ample bike parking and is situated near the Cedar Lake Trail, Route 17 bus line, and is in between the future West Lake and Beltline Southwest LRT stations. The outdoor amenity areas provide outdoor recreation space for residents. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8d) Page 4 Title: Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Traffic: SRF Consulting Group completed a traffic study for the Parkway 25 development. The final report dated August 5, 2016 determined the access, circulation, and parking on site to be adequate. The study recommended a review of truck turning movements to ensure garbage trucks have adequate accommodations to negotiate internal parking lot aisles. Staff has reviewed these turning movements and finds they are adequate. Parkland Dedication The application went before the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission on April 4, 2016. The Commission unanimously voted to recommend cash-in-lieu of parkland dedication. Park dedication fees totaling $166,500 and trail dedication fees totaling $24,975 shall be paid to the City of St. Louis Park prior to the City signing the final plat. Building and Site Design Analysis Parkway 25 meets the PUD ordinance goals for building and site design. The ordinance requires the City to find that the quality of building and site design proposed will substantially enhance aesthetics of the site and implement relevant goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. In addition, the following criteria shall be satisfied: (1) The design shall consider the project as a whole, and shall create a unified environment within project boundaries by ensuring architectural compatibility of all structures, efficient vehicular and pedestrian circulation, aesthetically pleasing landscape and site features, and design and efficient use of utilities. Staff finds the plan meets this requirement. (2) The design of a PUD shall achieve compatibility of the project with surrounding land uses, both existing and proposed, and shall minimize the potential adverse impacts of the PUD on surrounding land uses and the potential adverse effects of the surrounding land uses on the PUD. Staff finds this criteria will be met. (3) A PUD shall comply with the City’s Green Building Policy. This is a condition of approval. The architect is working with Xcel Energy, Centerpoint Energy, and the City of St. Louis Park to comply. (4) The use of green roofs or white roofs and on-site renewable energy is encouraged. Staff is working with the applicant on the addition of a white roof. ZONING ANALYSIS: The following table provides the development metrics. The property will be rezoned to a Planned Unit Development (PUD). The proposed performance and development standards, as indicated in the development plans, establish the development requirements for this property if approved. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8d) Page 5 Title: Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Zoning Compliance Table: Factor Required Proposed Met? Use Commercial Mixed Use-Commercial and Residential Yes Lot Area 2.0 acres, or less with City Council approval 1.574 acres Yes Height No maximum with PUD 67 feet Yes Building Materials Minimum of 60% Class I materials A: 69.4% Class I, 30.6% Class II B: 62.8% Class I, 37.2% Class II C: 73.4% Class I, 26.6% Class II D: 70.7% Class I, 29.3% Class II E: 71.0% Class I, 29.0% Class II F: 70.5% Class I, 29.5 % Class II G: 85.8% Class I, 14.2 % Class II H: 68.4% Class I, 31.6% Class II Yes Density 50 units/acre, or more with PUD 66.7 units/acre Yes Floor Area Ratio None with PUD 2.09 Yes Ground Floor Area Ratio N/A 0.2 Yes Off-Street Parking Residential: 154 spaces  1 space/bedroom Commercial: 75 spaces  1 space/60 square feet for restaurant (58 spaces)  1 space/200 square feet for fitness (25 spaces)  -10% parking reduction (-8 spaces) Total: 229 spaces  158 underground spaces  56 off-street surface spaces  16 on-street spaces Total: 229 parking spaces Yes Bicycle Parking Residential: 126  1 space/unit  1 space/10 automobile spaces Commercial: 8  10% of required vehicle parking Total: 134 spaces  131 interior bike spaces in underground ramp Total: 145 bike spaces Yes DORA 12% total lot area 12,187 square feet, 17.7% Yes Landscaping See Landscaping section Yes Setbacks None with PUD Front (North): 0’ Side (East): 14’ Rear (South): varies, 17’- 70’ Side (West): varies 47’- 73’ Yes Mechanical Equipment Full screening required Rooftop equipment screened by parapet so as not visible from off-site. Yes Sidewalks Required along all streets and building frontages Provided along all streets and building frontages Yes Refuse handling Full screening required Full screening provided by trash enclosure. Yes Transit service None required Served by route 17 Yes Stormwater Management Required Provided underground and includes other best management practices Yes City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8d) Page 6 Title: Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Uses The proposal includes a mix of commercial and residential space on the ground floor and residential above. The current commercial tenants are expected to be a 3,500 gross square foot restaurant on the northeast corner of the building and a 5,000 gross square foot fitness space on the northwest corner of the building. The ground level will also include a private fitness space for residents, community room, business conference room, and outdoor amenity space with a pool. The 1.574 acres of the proposed site is smaller than the required 2 acres for a Planned Unit Development although the zoning code allows for PUDs on smaller sites with City Council approval. Staff believes that a PUD will allow for conditions and requirements that fit the context and character of the individual site and the proposed development. A draft of the ordinance outlining these conditions is attached to this report. It should also be noted that the neighboring commercial property is owned by the applicant, and has the potential to be incorporated into the development in the future. The neighboring commercial property is not part of this application. The residential units are market rate and are a mix of studio, 1 bedroom, 1+ bedroom, and 2 bedrooms. See the table below for a breakdown of units. The applicant is not seeking financial assistance from the City of St. Louis Park. Architectural Design The proposal requests to combine the site to allow for a 5-story, 111-unit mixed use building. The building massing is sited toward the north side of the property and east and west sides. The 5th floor of the building steps back in the middle of the north façade and along the two wings toward the lower density housing to the south. Commercial and amenity functions are located exclusively on the ground floor providing active uses along the CSAH 25 Frontage Road. The primary building materials are stone, glass, and prefinished metal panel. Stone and storefront glazing form the base and corner of the building with a visual bridge of metal panel on the residential part of the building over a deep overhang sheltering pedestrians along the north façade and pedestrian plaza. The south side of the building is a continuation of these materials with a stucco area in the courtyard over the amenity deck and pool area. Height The current height limit for a multifamily building in the C-2 district is 3 stories while the PUD district has no restriction on height. Parkway 25 is proposed to be 5 stories or 67 feet in height which suits the context of the neighboring 5-story Shoreham mixed use development. Also, the higher elevation of 31st Street to the south, mitigates the height and scale of the proposed 5-story structure. Lighting The current photometric plan meets the recommended level of 0.5-1 fc past the property line. The LED lighting features chosen are consistent with the aesthetic features of the building and are not anticipated to present a nuisance to neighboring properties. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8d) Page 7 Title: Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Parking Parking will total 229 stalls with 158 stalls in the underground parking ramp, 25 stalls in the west surface parking lot, 31 stalls in the south surface parking lot, and 16 on-street spaces along Glenhurst Avenue and the Frontage Road. In order to ensure adequate parking on site, the applicant is providing a Parking Management Plan to the City as a condition of approval. This property is located between the future West Lake and Beltline Southwest LRT stations and is currently served by Metro Transit Bus Route 17. The applicant has also provided 145 bicycle parking stalls in both an indoor secure bike room and through exterior racks, and is providing a repair station. Access Vehicular access to the building occurs through two separate entrances. The first is located on the Frontage Road on the west side of the building near the proposed fitness tenant. Cars have two- way access to a 25 stall visitor surface parking lot with sidewalk access into the building. The second entrance is on Glenhurst Avenue to the South of the building. Cars have two-way access to a 31 stall visitor surface parking ramp with convenient sidewalk access to the restaurant tenant and ground level residential units. The south surface parking lot also has access to the underground residential parking. As an added convenience and to improve circulation, the applicant has proposed an exit only drive aisle to a currently unimproved alley which would allow cars to exit the surface lot via the alley onto Glenhurst. The applicant must improve the alley to City standards if approved. Loading/Service Areas The site plan shows a fully screened trash area on the west side for use by the commercial fitness tenant. The remaining commercial and residential trash will be collected in a fully enclosed trash room located in the underground ramp. Access to this room from other floors will be provided through separate trash and recycling chutes on each floor of the building. The trash room includes adequate space designated for future organics recycling. Trash pickup access will occur in the south parking lot. Delivery access is proposed on the frontage road during off-peak hours to reduce potential nuisance to residential properties and to prevent truck traffic through the neighborhood. Landscaping The landscape plan indicates 110 new trees, 338 new shrubs, and 1,146 new perennials. The project does not meet the City’s planting counts and tree replacement requirements but has provided a variety of alternative landscaping measures in order to meet the intent of the landscaping ordinance. These alternative measures include: a fenced dog run area, outdoor fireplaces, pergola structure, wood sun deck, and swimming pool. Designed Outdoor Recreation Area (DORA) The proposed development plans illustrate DORA through the inclusion of the outdoor amenity space. The plan exceeds the City’s minimum 12% DORA requirement by providing 17.7% DORA. The front plaza is located in Hennepin County right of way and is not included in the DORA percentage. Signs A sign plan was not submitted for review. Signs will require permits and must comply with the MX Mixed Use District signage code requirements. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8d) Page 8 Title: Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Utilities All small utilities will be placed underground. Utility service structures, such as a generator and transformer, will be screened completely from off-site with materials consistent with main building facade. Per the development agreement, buildings will provide the necessary infrastructure to take advantage of fiber-optic service lines in the vicinity of the development. Public Input A neighborhood meeting regarding the project was held on February 18, 2016. Approximately 6 people attended, excluding city and developer representatives. Attendees included owners and managers of nearby apartment and condo buildings and resident property owners. One of the primary concerns was parking, and a desire to avoid additional on-street parking demand on 31st Street. The neighboring property owner to the south inquired about access proposed to the alley, which was not included at the time. Staff and the applicant met with the neighboring property owner to discuss concerns about the proposed alley access included in the current plan. The property owner requested the applicant extend the improvements being made to the alley to his property to allow for a future connection. The applicant has not included this request in the current plan, and staff has not included this as a requirements. The design of the alley, however, has been reviewed by staff and it will not preclude a future extension to serve the neighbor’s property. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval of the Parkway 25 Preliminary and Final Plat subject to the conditions recommended by staff and included in the Parkway 25 Resolution. Staff recommends approval of the Parkway 25 Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development subject to the following conditions: 1. The site shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with the conditions of this ordinance, approved Official Exhibits, and City Code. 2. The on-site underground storm water management system shall be privately-owned and privately maintained. 3. The applicant shall provide a parking management plan. 4. All utility service structures shall be buried. If any utility service structure cannot be buried (i.e. electric transformer), it shall be integrated into the building design and 100% screened from off-site with materials consistent with the primary façade materials. 5. Prior to starting any land disturbing activities, the following conditions shall be met: a. Assent Form and Official Exhibits must be signed by the applicant and property owner. b. A preconstruction meeting shall be held with the appropriate development, construction, private utility, and City representatives. c. All necessary permits must be obtained. 6. Prior to issuance of building permits, the following conditions shall be met: a. The developer shall sign the City's Assent Form and the Official Exhibits. b. A Planning Development Contract shall be executed between the Developer and City that addresses, at a minimum: i. The conditions of PUD approval as applicable or appropriate. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8d) Page 9 Title: Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat ii. The installation of all public improvements including, but not limited to: on-street parking, alleys, sidewalks and boulevard improvements and the execution of any necessary agreements related to the maintenance of such improvements. iii. Easements related to electronic communication and fiber infrastructure. iv. A performance guarantee in the form of cash escrow or irrevocable letter of credit shall be provided to the City of St. Louis Park in the amount of 1.25 times of the costs of all public improvements (on-street parking, alley, sidewalks and boulevards), and the private site stormwater management system and landscaping. v. The developer shall reimburse City attorney’s fees in drafting/reviewing such documents as required in the final PUD approval. vi. The Mayor and City Manager are authorized to execute said Planning Development Contract. c. Final construction plans for all public improvements and private stormwater system shall be signed by a registered engineer and submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval. d. Building material samples and colors shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. 8. The developer shall comply with the following conditions during construction: a. All City noise ordinances shall be complied with, including that there be no construction activity between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. Monday through Friday, and between 10 p.m. and 9 a.m. on weekends and holidays. b. The site shall be kept free of dust and debris that could blow onto neighboring properties. c. Public streets shall be maintained free of dirt and shall be cleaned as necessary. d. The City shall be contacted a minimum of 72 hours prior to any work in a public street. e. Work in a public street shall take place only upon the determination by the City Engineer (or designee) that appropriate safety measures have been taken to ensure motorist and pedestrian safety. f. The developer shall install and maintain chain link security fencing that is at least six feet tall along the perimeter of the site. All gates and access points shall be locked during non-working hours. g. Temporary electric power connections shall not adversely impact surrounding neighborhood service. 9. Prior to the issuance of any permanent certificate of occupancy permit the following shall be completed: public improvements, private utilities, site landscaping and irrigation, and storm water management system shall be installed in accordance with the Official Exhibits. 10. All mechanical equipment shall be fully screened. Rooftop equipment may be located as indicated in the Official Exhibits so as not to be visible from off-site. 11. The materials used in, and placement of, all signs shall be integrated with the building design and architecture. All the above conditions have been incorporated into the ordinance, or will be incorporated into the Planning Development Contract. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8d) Page 10 Title: Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8d) Page 11 Title: Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat ORDINANCE NO. 16-____ ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ST. LOUIS PARK CITY CODE RELATING TO ZONING BY CREATING SECTION 36-268-PUD 7 AS A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4001 AND 4025 HIGHWAY 7 THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK DOES ORDAIN: Findings Sec. 1. The City Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission (Case No. 16-13-S, 16-14-PUD and 16-18-VAC) for amending the Zoning Ordinance to create a new Planned Unit Development (PUD) Zoning District. Sec. 2. The Comprehensive Plan designates this property as Commercial. Sec. 3. The Zoning Map shall be amended by reclassifying the following described lands from C-2 General Commercial to PUD 7: Lot 3, Block 1, Thomas O. Heggen’s Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota Sec. 4. The St. Louis Park Ordinance Code, Section 36-268 is hereby amended to add the following Planned Unit Development Zoning District: Section 36-268-PUD 7. (a) Development Plan The site shall be developed, used and maintained in conformance with the following Final PUD signed Official Exhibits: 1. C0.0– Cover Sheet 2. C0.1 – Site Survey 3. C0.2 – Preliminary Plat 4. C1.0 – Removals Plan 5. C2.0 – Site Plan 6. C3.0 – Grading Plan 7. C4.0 – Utility Plan 8. C5.0 – Civil Details 9. C5.1 – Civil Details 10. C5.2 – Civil Details 11. SW1.0 – SWPPP – Existing Conditions 12. SW1.1 – SWPPP – Proposed Conditions 13. SW1.2 – SWPPP – Narrative and Details 14. SW1.3 – SWPPP – Attachments 15. SW1.4 – SWPPP- Attachments 16. L000 – Tree Preservation Plan 17. L200 – Preliminary Landscape Plan City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8d) Page 12 Title: Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat 18. L500 – Planting Details 19. G000 – Cover Sheet 20. A100P – Floor Plan – Level -1 21. A110P – Floor Plan – Level 1 22. A120P – Floor Plan – Level 2-4 23. A150P – Floor Plan – Level 5 24. A160P – Roof Plan 25. A200 – Exterior Elevations 26. A201 – Exterior Elevations 27. A300 – Building Sections 28. AS100 – Architectural Site Plan 29. Site Lighting Photometric Plan 30. Zoning Map Amendment Exhibit 31. Preliminary Plat 32. Final Plat The site shall also conform to the following requirements: 1) The property shall be developed with 111 residential units and 8,500 square feet of ground floor commercial space. 2) At least 213 off-street parking spaces shall be provided. At least 16 on-street parallel parking and loading spaces shall be installed adjacent to the site. An off- street parking management plan shall be approved by the city and managed by the property owner, with the goal of avoiding spill over parking into surrounding streets in the neighborhood and maximizing the benefits of mixed use development and shared parking. 3) The maximum building height shall not exceed 67 feet and five stories. 4) The development site shall include a minimum of 17.7% percent designed outdoor recreation area based on private developable land area. (b) Permitted Uses (1) Multiple-family dwellings. Uses associated with the multiple-family dwellings, including, but not limited to the residential office, fitness facility, mail room, assembly rooms or general amenity space are limited to a maximum of 40% of the building first floor. (2) Commercial uses. Commercial uses are only permitted on the first floor, and are limited to the following: restaurant, office, private entertainment (indoor), retail shops, service, showrooms and studios. a. All parking requirements must be met for each use. b. Hours of operation for commercial uses shall be limited to 6 a.m. to 12 a.m. c. No more than 3,500 square feet of gross building floor area shall be used for restaurant. d. In vehicle sales is prohibited. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8d) Page 13 Title: Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat (3) Civic and institutional uses. Civic and institutional uses are limited to the following: education/academic, library, museums/art galleries, indoor public parks/open space, police service substations, post office customer service facilities, public studios and performance theaters. (c) Accessory Uses Accessory uses are as follows: (1) Incidental repair or processing which is necessary to conduct a permitted use and not to exceed ten percent of the gross floor area of the associated permitted use. (2) Home occupations complying with all of the conditions for home occupations located in the R-C district. (3) Catering, if accessory to food service, delicatessen or retail bakery. (4) Gardens. (5) Parking lots. (6) Public transit stops/shelters. (7) Outdoor seating, public address (PA) systems are prohibited. (8) Outdoor uses and outdoor storage are prohibited. (d) Special Performance Standards (1) All general zoning requirements not specifically addressed in this ordinance shall be met, including but not limited to: outdoor lighting, architectural design, landscaping, parking and screening requirements. (2) All trash, garbage, waste materials, trash containers, and recycling containers shall be kept in the manner required by this Code. All trash handling and loading areas shall be screened from view within a waste enclosure. (3) Signage shall be allowed in conformance with the MX- Mixed Use District requirements found in the sign code. (4) Façade. The following façade design guidelines shall be applicable to all ground floor non-residential facades: a. For street-facing facades, no more than 10% of total window and door area shall be glass block, mirrored, spandrel, frosted or other opaque glass, finishes or material including window painting and signage. The remaining 90% of window and door area shall be clear or slightly tinted glass, allowing views into and out of the interior. b. Visibility into the space shall be maintained for a minimum depth of three feet. This requirement shall not prohibit the display of merchandise. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8d) Page 14 Title: Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat (5) Awnings. a. Awnings must be constructed of heavy canvas fabric, metal and/or glass. Plastic and vinyl awnings are prohibited. b. Backlit awnings are prohibited. Sec. 4. The contents of Planning Case File 16-13-S, 16-14-PUD and 16-18-VAC are hereby entered into and made part of the public hearing record and the record of decision for this case. Sec. 5. This Ordinance shall take effect fifteen days after its publication. Public Hearing July 20, 2016 First Reading August 15, 2016 Second Reading September 6, 2016 Date of Publication September 15, 2016 Date Ordinance takes effect September 30, 2016 Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council September 6, 2016 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Approved as to Form and Execution: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Soren Mattick, City Attorney City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8d) Page 15 Title: Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat RESOLUTION NO. 16-____ RESOLUTION APPROVING PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT OF THE PARKWAY 25 ADDITION 4001 AND 4025 HIGHWAY 7 BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of St. Louis Park: Findings 1. Sela Group, subdivider of the land proposed to be platted as The Parkway 25 Addition has submitted an application for approval of preliminary and final plat in the manner required for platting of land under the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code, and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder. 2. The proposed preliminary and final plat has been found to be in all respects consistent with the City Plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and the ordinances of the City of St. Louis Park. 3. The proposed plat is situated upon the following described lands in Hennepin County, Minnesota, to-wit: Parcel 1: Lot 2, Block 1, Thomas O. Heggen’s Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Torrens Property. Parcel 2: Lot 3, Block 1, Thomas O. Heggen’s Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota Abstract Property. Conclusion The proposed preliminary and final plat of The Parkway 25 Addition is hereby approved and accepted by the City as being in accord and conformity with all ordinances, City plans and regulations of the City of St. Louis Park and the laws of the State of Minnesota, provided, however, that this approval is made subject to the opinion of the City Attorney and Certification by the City Clerk subject to the following conditions: 1. The site shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with the conditions of this ordinance, approved Official Exhibits, and City Code. 2. The on-site underground storm water management system shall be privately-owned and privately maintained. 3. All utility service structures shall be buried. If any utility service structure cannot be buried (i.e. electric transformer), it shall be integrated into the building design and 100% screened from off-site with materials consistent with the primary façade materials. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8d) Page 16 Title: Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat 4. Prior to the City signing and releasing the final plat to the developer for filing with Hennepin County: a. Park dedication fees totaling $166,500 and trail dedication fees totaling $24,975 shall be paid to the City of St. Louis Park. b. A financial security in the form of a cash escrow or letter of credit in the amount of $1,000 shall be submitted to the City to insure that a signed Mylar copy of the final plat is provided to the City. c. A Planning Development Contract shall be executed between the City and Developer that addresses, at a minimum: i. The installation of all public improvements including, but not limited to: on-street parking, alleys, sidewalks, boulevards, and the execution of necessary easements related to such improvements. ii. A performance guarantee for 1.25 times the estimated costs for the installation of all public improvements, placement of iron monuments at property corners, and the private site stormwater management system and landscaping. iii. The applicant shall reimburse City Attorney’s fees in drafting/reviewing such documents as required in the final plat approval. iv. The Mayor and City Manager are authorized to execute the Planning Development Contract. 5. Prior to starting any land disturbing activities, excluding demolition, the following conditions shall be met: a. Proof of recording the final plat shall be submitted to the City. b. Assent Form and Official Exhibits must be signed by the applicant and property owner. c. A preconstruction meeting shall be held with the appropriate development, construction, private utility, and City representatives. d. All necessary permits must be obtained. e. A performance guarantee in the form of cash escrow or irrevocable letter of credit shall be provided to the City of St. Louis Park for all public improvements (street, sidewalks, boulevard improvements, etc.) and the private site stormwater management system and landscaping. 6. The on-site underground storm water management system shall be privately-owned and privately maintained. Access to the system shall be provided to the City for clean-out and inspection purposes when warranted. Access points shall be covered by a drainage and utility easement, as provided on the final plat. 7. The developer or owner shall pay an administrative fee of $750 per violation of any condition of this approval. 8. The City Clerk is hereby directed to supply two certified copies of this Resolution to the above-named owner and subdivider, who is the applicant herein. 9. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute all contracts required herein, and the City Clerk is hereby directed to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon the said plat when all of the conditions set forth have been fulfilled. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8d) Page 17 Title: Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat 10. Such execution of the certificate upon said plat by the City Clerk, as required under Section 26-123(1)j of the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code, shall be conclusive showing of proper compliance therewith by the subdivider and City officials charged with duties above described and shall entitle such plat to be placed on record forthwith without further formality. The City Clerk is instructed to record certified copies of this resolution in the Office of the Hennepin County Register of Deeds or Registrar of Titles as the case may be. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council September 6, 2016 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8d) Page 18 Title: Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Excerpts – Official Minutes PLANNING COMMISSION ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA JULY 20, 2016 – 6:00 p.m. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 3. Public Hearings A. Parkway 25 Preliminary and Final PUD; Preliminary and Final Plat Location: 4001 and 4025 State Highway 7 Applicant: Sela Group, LLC Case No.: 16-13-S and 16-14-PUD Nicole Mardell, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. She explained the proposal for redevelopment of the former Vescio’s restaurant and ValuStay Inn site is to demolish the existing buildings, combine the properties, and develop a 5-story, mixed-use building with 111 residential units, 8,500 sq. ft. of commercial space, and parking located in two surface lots and in an underground parking ramp. Commissioner Carper asked about sidewalks and the alley. Ms. Mardell responded that there will be sidewalk on Glenhurst, along the frontage road, and along the interior parking lots. She said the alley is currently unimproved. The applicant will be responsible for widening and paving the alley. Vice Chair Peilen asked how a resident with underground parking would exit the site. Ms. Mardell responded the exit would be up the ramp, through the south parking lot and onto Glenhurst. She added that the alley exit is for additional circulation if the parking lot is full. Vice Chair Peilen said at the present time there is only a stop sign at Glenhurst. She asked if the city had plans for that intersection as there will be two developments in the vicinity. Sean Walther, Planning and Zoning Supervisor, noted that a traffic study was completed for the development. Operations at Glenhurst Ave S and the frontage road are expected to have a Level of Service A. The study relied on counts predating the closing of the Hwy. 7 bridge over Highway 100, and includes the Shoreham Development and the proposed development in the models. Dean Dovolis, applicant, DJR Architects, provided an overview of the proposed development. They hope to start construction in spring 2017. In response to Commissioner Carper’s questions, Mr. Dovolis discussed solar panels, green roof, LED lighting, resident gardens, parking lot surface, and on-street parking. Paz Sela, owner, spoke briefly about parking. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8d) Page 19 Title: Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat The Vice Chair opened the public hearing. As no one was present wishing to speak she closed the public hearing. Commissioner Robertson stated it is a nice project. He thanked DJR Architecture for consistently bringing very thoughtful designs to St. Louis Park. Commissioner Robertson made a motion recommending approval of the Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development and Preliminary and Final Plat. Commissioner Tatalovich seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 5-0. UPUPUPUPUPUPFitness1,225 SFCommunity1,835 SFM102 SFW112 SFOffice230 SFBusinessConference214 SFLobby3,268 SFJanitor56 SFCommercial3,316 SFMail160 SFCOMMERCIAL 24,722 SFSTUDIO742 SF2BR1,252 SF1BR665 SF1BR849 SF1BR873 SFSTUDIO427 SFPOOL STOR213 SFTRASH63 SFMEN176 SFPOOL EQUIP109 SFWOMEN176 SFNOPARKINGNOPARKINGGARBAGE TRUCKTURNING MOVEMENTFIRE TRUCK LOCATIONDELIVERY VEHICLE LOCATIONNOPARKINGTURNAROUNDONLY4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.comMatt Pavek Pat Sarver763-213-3944 952-250-2003COPYRIGHT 2015 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONPARKWAY APARTMENTS 4001 & 4025 HIGHWAY 7, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 4915 W. 35TH STREET, SUITE #102, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 SELA GROUP, LLC PROJECT ................PROJECT NUMBER:151623/11/16CITY SUBMITTALDJRARCHITECTURE, INC333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.com7/11/16PUD RESUBMITTAL..4/18/16PUD RESUBMITTAL6/14/16PUD RESUBMITTAL44263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.6/14/16REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC0.0TITLE SHEET............PARKWAY APARTMENTSST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTASHEET INDEXSHEET NUMBERSHEET TITLEC0.0TITLE SHEETSITE LOCATIONSITE LOCATION MAPNSITE SURVEYC0.1UTILITY PLANC4.0ISSUED FOR: CITY SUBMITTALMASTER LEGEND:EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL932T.O.CURB AND GUTTER (T.O = TIP OUT)939SPOT GRADE ELEVATION (GUTTER/FLOW LINEUNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)PROPOSED 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL932.0932.0BC / 932.0TCSPOT GRADE ELEVATION BACK OF CURB (TOP OFCURB)SPOT GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF WALLSOIL BORING LOCATIONSPOT GRADE ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WALLEMERGENCY OVERFLOW932.0TW932.0BWPROPOSED MANHOLE STORMPROPOSED GATE VALVEPROPOSED SANITARY SEWERPROPOSED STORM SEWERPROPOSED WATER MAINPROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTEXISTING LIGHTEXISTING GAS METEREXISTING MANHOLEEXISTING CATCH BASINEXISTING GATE VALVEEXISTING HYDRANTEXISTING GAS VALVEEXISTING ELECTRIC BOXEXISTING UNDERGROUND CABLEEXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRICEXISTING STOPBOXEXISTING GAS MAINEXISTING WATER MAINEXISTING STORM SEWEREXISTING SANITARY SEWERPROPOSED MANHOLE SANITARYsPROPOSED CATCH BASIN OR CATCH BASIN MANHOLE STORMDYH PROPOSED SIGNSILT FENCE / GRADING LIMIT932.0XEXISTING SPOT GRADE ELEVATIONINLET PROTECTIONSTABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEDRAINAGE ARROWDEVELOPER / PROPERTY OWNER:SELA GROUP LLC4915 W 35TH STREETSUITE 102ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416ENGINEER / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:CIVIL SITE GROUP4931 W 35TH STREETSUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416612-615-0060SURVEYOR:GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER:STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN - EXISTING CONDITIONSSW1.0GRADING PLANC3.0C5.0C5.1DETAILSSTORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN - PROPOSED CONDITIONSSW1.1SW1.2C2.0SITE PLANPROPOSED LIGHTSTORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN - NARRATIVE AND DETAILSSW1.3DETAILSC1.0REMOVALS PLANHARRY S. JOHNSON CO., INC.9063 LYNDALE AVENUE SOUTHBLOOMINGTON, MN 55420952-884-5341GOPHER STATE ONE CALLWWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG(800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE(651) 454-0002 LOCALSTORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN - NOTESSW1.4STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN - NOTESTERRACON3535 HOFFMAN ROAD EASTWHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110651-770-1500TRUCK TURNING MAP01" = 50'-0"50'-0"25'-0"PRELIMINARY PLATC0.2C5.2DETAILSCity Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8d) Title: Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page 20 REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC0.1SITE SURVEY............City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8d) Title: Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page 21 City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8d) Title: Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page 22 City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8d) Title: Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page 23 CONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSREMOVE EXISTINGPAVEMENT AND BASEMATERIAL ANDPARKING SIGNS, TYP.REMOVE EXISTINGPAVEMENT AND BASEMATERIAL, TYP.REMOVE EXISTINGPAVEMENT AND BASEMATERIAL ANDPARKING SIGNS, TYP.REMOVE EX BUILDING, STRUCTURES,FOUNDATIONS, FOOTINGS & BASEMATERIALS, PER LOCAL STATE & FEDERALSTANDARDS. REMOVE/DISCONNECT ALLSERVICES & UTILITIES PER UTILITYCOMPANY AND/OR L.G.U. STANDARDSREMOVE EX BUILDING, STRUCTURES,FOUNDATIONS, FOOTINGS & BASEMATERIALS, PER LOCAL STATE & FEDERALSTANDARDS. REMOVE/DISCONNECT ALLSERVICES & UTILITIES PER UTILITYCOMPANY AND/OR L.G.U. STANDARDSREMOVE EXISTINGCURB ANDGUTTER, TYP.REMOVE EXISTINGCURB ANDGUTTER, TYP.REMOVE EXISTING TREEAND ROOT BALL, TYP.REMOVE EXISTING TREEAND ROOT BALL, TYP.REMOVE EXISTINGCONCRETESIDEWALK, TYP.REMOVE EXISTINGUTILITY SERVICESPER CITYSTANDARDSREMOVE EXISTINGBLOCK RETAININGWALLSREMOVE EXISTING SIGNREMOVE EXISTINGBLOCK RETAININGWALLSREMOVE EXISTINGFENCE AND POSTS, TYP.REMOVE EXISTINGCATCH BASIN ANDSTORM SEWER PIPEREMOVE EXISTINGSTORM SEWER PIPEREMOVE EXISTINGELECTRICALTRANSFORMER.COORDINATE WITHUTILITY COMPANYREMOVE EX BUILDING, STRUCTURES,FOUNDATIONS, FOOTINGS & BASEMATERIALS, PER LOCAL STATE & FEDERALSTANDARDS. REMOVE/DISCONNECT ALLSERVICES & UTILITIES PER UTILITYCOMPANY AND/OR L.G.U. STANDARDSALL EXISTING SEWER AND WATERSERVICES MUST BE DISCONNECTEDAT THE MAIN PRIOR TO ISSUING THEDEMO PERMIT.REMOVAL NOTES:1.SEE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION STORM WATERMANAGEMENT PLAN.2.REMOVAL OF MATERIALS NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT, STATE ANDLOCAL REGULATIONS.3.REMOVAL OF PRIVATE UTILITIES SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH UTILITY OWNER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTIONACTIVITIES.4.EXISTING PAVEMENTS SHALL BE SAWCUT IN LOCATIONS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS OR THE NEARESTJOINT FOR PROPOSED PAVEMENT CONNECTIONS.5.REMOVED MATERIALS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF TO A LEGAL OFF-SITE LOCATION AND IN ACCORDANCE WITHSTATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS.6.ABANDON, REMOVAL, CONNECTION, AND PROTECTION NOTES SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AREAPPROXIMATE. COORDINATE WITH PROPOSED PLANS.7.EXISTING ON-SITE FEATURES NOT NOTED FOR REMOVAL SHALL BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT THEDURATION OF THE CONTRACT.8.PROPERTY LINES SHALL BE CONSIDERED GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ONTHE DRAWINGS. WORK WITHIN THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL INCLUDE STAGING,DEMOLITION AND CLEAN-UP OPERATIONS AS WELL AS CONSTRUCTION SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS.9.MINOR WORK OUTSIDE OF THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL BE ALLOWED AS SHOWN ON THEPLAN AND PER CITY REQUIREMENTS.10.DAMAGE BEYOND THE PROPERTY LIMITS CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SHALL BE REPAIRED IN AMANNER APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY.11.PROPOSED WORK (BUILDING AND CIVIL) SHALL NOT DISTURB EXISTING UTILITIES UNLESS OTHERWISESHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.12.SITE SECURITY MAY BE NECESSARY AND PROVIDED IN A MANNER TO PROHIBIT VANDALISM, AND THEFT,DURING AND AFTER NORMAL WORK HOURS, THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. SECURITYMATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY.13.VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR DELIVERY AND INSPECTION ACCESS DURINGNORMAL OPERATING HOURS. AT NO POINT THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT SHALLCIRCULATION OF ADJACENT STREETS BE BLOCKED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.14.ALL TRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED AND ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THEMINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALLINCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO, SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS, AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALLPUBLIC STREETS SHALL REMAIN OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BEPERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY.15.SHORING FOR BUILDING EXCAVATION MAY BE USED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CONTRACTOR AND ASAPPROVED BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE AND THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.16.STAGING, DEMOLITION, AND CLEAN-UP AREAS SHALL BE WITHIN THE PROPERTY LIMITS AS SHOWN ON THEDRAWINGS AND MAINTAINED IN A MANNER AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY.CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK REMOVAL NOTES:1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC REMOVAL NOTES.REMOVALS LEGEND:EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL932TREE PROTECTIONREMOVAL OF PAVEMENT AND ALL BASE MATERIAL,INCLUDING BIT., CONC., AND GRAVEL PVMTS.REMOVAL OF STRUCTURE INCLUDING ALLFOOTINGS AND FOUNDATIONS.SEE SWPPP ON SHEETS SW1.0-SW1.4EROSION CONTROL NOTES:TREE REMOVAL - INCLUDING ROOTS AND STUMPS4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.comMatt Pavek Pat Sarver763-213-3944 952-250-2003COPYRIGHT 2015 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONPARKWAY APARTMENTS 4001 & 4025 HIGHWAY 7, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 4915 W. 35TH STREET, SUITE #102, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 SELA GROUP, LLC PROJECT ................PROJECT NUMBER:151623/11/16CITY SUBMITTALDJRARCHITECTURE, INC333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.com7/11/16PUD RESUBMITTAL..4/18/16PUD RESUBMITTAL6/14/16PUD RESUBMITTAL01" = 20'-0"20'-0"10'-0"NREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC1.0REMOVALS PLAN............GOPHER STATE ONE CALLWWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG(800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE(651) 454-0002 LOCAL44263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.6/14/16City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8d) Title: Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page 24 REMOVE AND REPLACEEXISTING PAVEMENT ANDBASE MATERIAL TO MATCHEXISTING PAVEMENT SECTIONFOR UTILITY CONSTRUCTIONUPUPUPUPUPUPFitness1,225 SFCommunity1,835 SFM102 SFW112 SFOffice230 SFBusinessConference214 SFLobby3,268 SFJanitor56 SFCommercial3,316 SFMail160 SFCOMMERCIAL 24,722 SFSTUDIO742 SF2BR1,252 SF1BR665 SF1BR849 SF1BR873 SFSTUDIO427 SFPOOL STOR213 SFTRASH63 SFMEN176 SFPOOL EQUIP109 SFWOMEN176 SF5.8'(2)+ACC.AISLE=27.0'10 STALLS@ 9' =54.0'13 STALLS @ 8.5' =110.5'3 STALLS @ 8.5' =25.5'3 STALLS @ 8.5' =25.5'(2)+ACC.AISLE=25.5'2 STALLS@ 8.5' =17.0'NOPARKINGNOPARKINGACCESSIBLE PARKINGSPACE, INCL.SIGNAGE, STRIPINGAND RAMPSCONC. WALK, TYPPVMT.STRIPINGTYP.BIT. PVMT.,TYPB612 C&G,TYP.CONC. WALK, TYPPVMT. STRIPINGTYP.BIT. PVMT.,TYPB612 C&G,TYP.CONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSSEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FORCOURTYARD DESIGN6 STALLS @ 22.0' =132.0'CONCRETE DRIVEWAYAPRON PER CITYSTANDARDS, TYP.CONCRETE DRIVEWAYAPRON PER CITYSTANDARDS, TYP.CONCRETESIDEWALK PER CITYSTANDARDS, TYP.CONCRETESIDEWALK PER CITYSTANDARDS, TYP.LOWER LEVELBUILDING OUTLINELOWER LEVELBUILDING OUTLINEB618 C&G PER CITYSTANDARDS, TYP.AIR INTAKE WELL,SEE ARCH'L PLANSFOR DETAILSAIR EXHAUST WELL,SEE ARCH'L PLANSFOR DETAILSTRANSFORMERPAD, COORDINATEWITH MECH'LPVMT. STRIPINGTYP.SEG. BLOCKRETAINING WALL,SEE GRADINGPLAN FOR HEIGHTDOG PARK, SEELANDSCAPE PLANFOR DETAILS47.6'15.4'6.2'18.0'24.0'18.0'6.8'18.0' 24.0'18.0' 6.0' 24.0'24.0'6.0'CONCRETE STAIRS,COORD. W/LANDSCAPEPLAN, TYP.RETAINING WLL,COORD.W/LANDSCAPEPLAN, TYP.CONC. WALK, SEELANDSCAPE PLANFOR SCORINGPATTERN, TYP.CONCRETE PATIO10.6'5.0'BIKE RACKS, SEELANDSCAPE PLANSFOR DETAILSCONCRETE STAIRS,COORD. W/LANDSCAPEPLAN, TYP.CONCRETE PAVEMENTFOR BIKE RACKS, SEELANDSCAPE PLANS FORDETAILS10 STALLS @ 25 .0 ' =250 .0 '6.0'B618 C&G PER CITYSTANDARDS, TYP.CONCRETESIDEWALK PER CITYSTANDARDS, TYP.6.0'2 STALLS@ 8.5' =17.0'4.0'CONCRETE PED RAMPPER MNDOT DETAILS,TYP.14.2'69.3' 19.5' 23.7'73.6'36" CONCRETE VALLEYGUTTER PER CITYSTANDARDS, TYP.CONCRETE PAVEMENTBETWEEN VALLEYGUTTER AND CURBCONCRETE PAVEMENTBETWEEN VALLEYGUTTER AND CURB36" CONCRETE VALLEYGUTTER PER CITYSTANDARDS, TYP.BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT,MATCH EXISTING SECTION10' FIBER LINEEASEMENT12.0' CURBTAPER12.0' CURBTAPERRIBBON CURB2 STALLS@ 8.5' =17.0'3 STALLS@ 8.0' =24.0'1 STALL@ 8.5' =8.5'1 STALLS@ 9' =9.0'7 STALLS +ACC @ 8.5' =68.0'8 STALLS @ 8.5' =68.0'NOPARKINGTURNAROUNDONLY16.7' 6.2' 18.0'3' CURBTAPER7' CURBTAPERIMPROVE THE ALLEY TO CITYSTANDARDS. 10' WIDE 8" THICK12.0'R1 0 . 0 'R22.0'R5 . 0 ' R3.0'R2.0'R 3 . 0 ' T Y P .4.5'4.5'4.5'4.1'CONCRETE STAIRS,COORD. W/LANDSCAPEPLAN, TYP.CONCRETE STAIRS,COORD. W/LANDSCAPEPLAN, TYP.13' CURBTAPER11' CURBTAPER3' CURBTAPERCONTRACTOR TORECEIVE PERMITFROM CITY FORGRADING IN ROW1.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFYLOCATIONS AND LAYOUT OF ALL SITE ELEMENTS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION,INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING ANDPROPOSED PROPERTY LINES, TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES, EASEMENTS, SETBACKS,UTILITIES, BUILDINGS AND PAVEMENTS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FINALLOCATIONS OF ALL ELEMENTS FOR THE SITE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELYNOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS. THECONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IF ANY EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONSOR DEPTHS WILL NEED TO BE ADJUSTED FOR CONSTRUCTION TO SATISFY MINIMUMSEPARATION AND DEPTH REQUIREMENTS. REVISIONS AND RELOCATIONS THAT AREREQUIRED DUE TO SITE VERIFICATION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE AT OWNER'SEXPENSE. ANY REVISIONS REQUIRED AFTER COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION, DUETO LOCATIONAL ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE CORRECTED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TOOWNER. ADJUSTMENTS TO THE LAYOUT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THEENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF MATERIALS. STAKELAYOUT FOR APPROVAL.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITSPRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING A RIGHT-OF-WAY AND STREET OPENING PERMIT.2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY RECOMMENDATIONS NOTED IN THE GEO TECHNICALREPORT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF SITE IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS.3.CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY COORDINATES AND LOCATION DIMENSIONS OF THEBUILDING AND STAKE FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVEPRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF FOOTING MATERIALS.4.LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURES, ROADWAY PAVEMENTS, CURBS AND GUTTERS, BOLLARDS,AND WALKS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD, PRIOR TOINSTALLATION, FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.5.CURB DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB. BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACEOF CONCRETE FOUNDATION. LOCATION OF BUILDING IS TO BUILDING FOUNDATION ANDSHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS.6.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS OR SAMPLES AS SPECIFIED FORREVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TOFABRICATION FOR ALL PREFABRICATED SITE IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS SUCH AS, BUTNOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING, FURNISHINGS, PAVEMENTS, WALLS, RAILINGS,BENCHES, FLAGPOLES, LANDING PADS FOR CURB RAMPS, AND LIGHT AND POLES. THEOWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT INSTALLED MATERIALS NOT PREVIOUSLYAPPROVED.7.PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH TRUNCATED DOME LANDINGAREAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH A.D.A. REQUIREMENTS-SEE DETAIL.8.CROSSWALK STRIPING SHALL BE 24" WIDE WHITE PAINTED LINE, SPACED 48" ON CENTERPERPENDICULAR TO THE FLOW OF TRAFFIC. WIDTH OF CROSSWALK SHALL BE 5' WIDE.ALL OTHER PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE WHITE IN COLOR UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTEDOR REQUIRED BY ADA OR LOCAL GOVERNING BODIES.9.CURB AND GUTTER TYPE SHALL BE B612 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THEDRAWINGS-TAPER BETWEEN CURB TYPES-SEE DETAIL.10.ALL CURB RADII ARE MINIMUM 3' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.11.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO FINAL PLAT FOR LOT BOUNDARIES, NUMBERS, AREASAND DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO SITE IMPROVEMENTS.12.FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS, DIMENSIONS.13.PARKING IS TO BE SET PARALLEL OR PERPENDICULAR TO EXISTING BUILDING UNLESSNOTED OTHERWISE.14.ALL PARKING LOT PAINT STRIPPING TO BE WHITE, 4" WIDE TYP.15.BITUMINOUS PAVING TO BE "LIGHT DUTY" UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SEE DETAILSHEETS FOR PAVEMENT SECTIONS.16.ALL TREES THAT ARE TO REMAIN ARE TO BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE WITH ACONSTRUCTION FENCE AT THE DRIP LINE. SEE LANDSCAPE DOCUMENTS.SITE LAYOUT NOTES:SITE PLAN LEGEND:CONCRETE PAVEMENT AS SPECIFIED (PAD OR WALK)PROPERTY LINECURB AND GUTTER-SEE NOTES(T.O.) TIP OUT GUTTER WHERE APPLICABLE-SEE PLANT.O.TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL ARROWSCITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK SITE SPECIFIC NOTES:SIGN AND POST ASSEMBLY. SHOP DRAWINGS REQUIRED.HC = ACCESSIBLE SIGNNP = NO PARKING FIRE LANEST = STOPCP = COMPACT CAR PARKING ONLY4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.comMatt Pavek Pat Sarver763-213-3944 952-250-2003COPYRIGHT 2015 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONPARKWAY APARTMENTS 4001 & 4025 HIGHWAY 7, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 4915 W. 35TH STREET, SUITE #102, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 SELA GROUP, LLC PROJECT ................PROJECT NUMBER:151623/11/16CITY SUBMITTALDJRARCHITECTURE, INC333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.com7/11/16PUD RESUBMITTAL..4/18/16PUD RESUBMITTAL6/14/16PUD RESUBMITTAL01" = 20'-0"20'-0"10'-0"NREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC2.0SITE PLAN............SITE AREA TABLE:1.ALL RETAINING WALLS GREATER THAN 4 FEET IN HEIGHT MUST BE DESIGNED BYA PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER.GOPHER STATE ONE CALLWWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG(800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE(651) 454-0002 LOCAL44263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.6/14/16City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8d) Title: Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page 25 UPUPUPUPUPUPFitness1,225 SFCommunity1,835 SFM102 SFW112 SFOffice230 SFBusinessConference214 SFLobby3,268 SFJanitor56 SFCommercial3,316 SFMail160 SFCOMMERCIAL 24,722 SFSTUDIO742 SF2BR1,252 SF1BR665 SF1BR849 SF1BR873 SFSTUDIO427 SFPOOL STOR213 SFTRASH63 SFMEN176 SFPOOL EQUIP109 SFWOMEN176 SFNOPARKINGNOPARKINGCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSNOPARKINGTURNAROUNDONLY1.SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL LAYOUT & GENERAL GRADING NOTES.2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE SITE GRADING CONSTRUCTION (INCLUDING BUT NOTLIMITED TO SITE PREPARATION, SOIL CORRECTION, EXCAVATION, EMBANKMENT, ETC.) INACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. ALL SOIL TESTINGSHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BERESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOIL TESTS AND INSPECTIONS WITH THE SOILSENGINEER.3.GRADING AND EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THENATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT REQUIREMENTS &PERMIT REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY.4.PROPOSED SPOT GRADES ARE FLOW-LINE FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS, UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED.5.GRADES OF WALKS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH 5% MAX. LONGITUDINAL SLOPE AND 1% MIN. AND 2%MAX. CROSS SLOPE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.6.PROPOSED SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 3:1 UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE ON THE DRAWINGS.MAXIMUM SLOPES IN MAINTAINED AREAS IS 4:17.PROPOSED RETAINING WALLS, FREESTANDING WALLS, OR COMBINATION OF WALL TYPES GREATERTHAN 4' IN HEIGHT SHALL BE DESIGNED AND ENGINEERED BY A REGISTERED RETAINING WALLENGINEER. DESIGN DRAWINGS SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION.8.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF GRADE STAKES THROUGHOUTTHE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION TO ESTABLISH PROPER GRADES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALLALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR A FINAL FIELD CHECK OF FINISHED GRADES ACCEPTABLE TO THEENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO TOPSOIL AND SODDING ACTIVITIES.9.IF EXCESS OR SHORTAGE OF SOIL MATERIAL EXISTS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TRANSPORT ALLEXCESS SOIL MATERIAL OFF THE SITE TO AN AREA SELECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR, OR IMPORTSUITABLE MATERIAL TO THE SITE.10.EXCAVATE TOPSOIL FROM AREAS TO BE FURTHER EXCAVATED OR REGRADED AND STOCKPILE INAREAS DESIGNATED ON THE SITE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SALVAGE ENOUGH TOPSOIL FORRESPREADING ON THE SITE AS SPECIFIED. EXCESS TOPSOIL SHALL BE PLACED IN EMBANKMENTAREAS, OUTSIDE OF BUILDING PADS, ROADWAYS AND PARKING AREAS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALLSUBCUT CUT AREAS, WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED, TO A DEPTH OF 6 INCHES. RESPREADTOPSOIL IN AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 6 INCHES.11.FINISHED GRADING SHALL BE COMPLETED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL UNIFORMLY GRADE AREASWITHIN LIMITS OF GRADING, INCLUDING ADJACENT TRANSITION AREAS. PROVIDE A SMOOTHFINISHED SURFACE WITHIN SPECIFIED TOLERANCES, WITH UNIFORM LEVELS OR SLOPES BETWEENPOINTS WHERE ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN, OR BETWEEN SUCH POINTS AND EXISTING GRADES.AREAS THAT HAVE BEEN FINISH GRADED SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM SUBSEQUENTCONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS, TRAFFIC AND EROSION. REPAIR ALL AREAS THAT HAVE BECOMERUTTED BY TRAFFIC OR ERODED BY WATER OR HAS SETTLED BELOW THE CORRECT GRADE. ALLAREAS DISTURBED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS SHALL BE RESTORED TO EQUAL ORBETTER THAN ORIGINAL CONDITION OR TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NEW WORK.12.PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE AGGREGATE BASE, A TEST ROLL WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE STREETAND/OR PARKING AREA SUBGRADE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A LOADED TANDEM AXLETRUCK WITH A GROSS WEIGHT OF 25 TONS. THE TEST ROLLING SHALL BE AT THE DIRECTION OFTHE SOILS ENGINEER AND SHALL BE COMPLETED IN AREAS AS DIRECTED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER.THE SOILS ENGINEER SHALL DETERMINE WHICH SECTIONS OF THE STREET OR PARKING AREA AREUNSTABLE. CORRECTION OF THE SUBGRADE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITHTHE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOILS ENGINEER.13. TOLERANCES13.1.THE BUILDING SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN0.30 FOOT ABOVE, OR 0.30 FOOT BELOW, THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION AT ANY POINT WHEREMEASUREMENT IS MADE.13.2.THE STREET OR PARKING AREA SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARYBY MORE THAN 0.05 FOOT ABOVE, OR 0.10 FOOT BELOW, THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION OF ANYPOINT WHERE MEASUREMENT IS MADE.13.3.AREAS WHICH ARE TO RECEIVE TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO WITHIN 0.30 FOOT ABOVE ORBELOW THE REQUIRED ELEVATION, UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE BY THE ENGINEER.13.4.TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO PLUS OR MINUS 1/2 INCH OF THE SPECIFIED THICKNESS.14.MAINTENANCE14.1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT NEWLY GRADED AREAS FROM TRAFFIC AND EROSION,AND KEEP AREA FREE OF TRASH AND DEBRIS.14.2.CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR AND REESTABLISH GRADES IN SETTLED, ERODED AND RUTTEDAREAS TO SPECIFIED TOLERANCES. DURING THE CONSTRUCTION, IF REQUIRED, AND DURINGTHE WARRANTY PERIOD, ERODED AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED SHALL BERESEEDED AND MULCHED.14.3.WHERE COMPLETED COMPACTED AREAS ARE DISTURBED BY SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTIONOPERATIONS OR ADVERSE WEATHER, CONTRACTOR SHALL SCARIFY, SURFACE, RESHAPE,AND COMPACT TO REQUIRED DENSITY PRIOR TO FURTHER CONSTRUCTION.GENERAL GRADING NOTES:819SPOT GRADE ELEVATION (FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALGRADING PLAN LEGEND:891.0891.0 GSPOT GRADE ELEVATION GUTTER891.0 BCSPOT GRADE ELEVATION BACK OF CURB (TOP OF CURB)891.0 BS/TSSPOT GRADE ELEVATION BOTTOM OF STAIRS/TOP OF STAIRSEX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL891T.O.TIP OUT (T.O.) CURB AND GUTTER WHEREAPPLICABLE - TAPER GUTTERS TO DRAIN AS SHOWNEXISTING AND PROPOSED DRAINAGE ARROWSPER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT BY TERRACON, DATED 10-5-15 GROUNDWATER WAS OBSERVEDIN ALL BORINGS AT APPROXIMATELY 10 FEET DEEP.CPT-1 873.0B-2871.0B-3871.0CPT-4871.0GROUNDWATER INFORMATION:CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK GRADING NOTES:1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC GRADING NOTES.SEE SWPPP ON SHEETS SW1.0-SW1.4EROSION CONTROL NOTES:4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.comMatt Pavek Pat Sarver763-213-3944 952-250-2003COPYRIGHT 2015 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONPARKWAY APARTMENTS 4001 & 4025 HIGHWAY 7, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 4915 W. 35TH STREET, SUITE #102, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 SELA GROUP, LLC PROJECT ................PROJECT NUMBER:151623/11/16CITY SUBMITTALDJRARCHITECTURE, INC333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.com7/11/16PUD RESUBMITTAL..4/18/16PUD RESUBMITTAL6/14/16PUD RESUBMITTAL01" = 20'-0"20'-0"10'-0"NREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC3.0GRADING PLAN............GOPHER STATE ONE CALLWWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG(800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE(651) 454-0002 LOCAL44263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.6/14/16City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8d) Title: Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page 26 UPUPUPUPUPUPFitness1,225 SFCommunity1,835 SFM102 SFW112 SFOffice230 SFBusinessConference214 SFLobby3,268 SFJanitor56 SFCommercial3,316 SFMail160 SFCOMMERCIAL 24,722 SFSTUDIO742 SF2BR1,252 SF1BR665 SF1BR849 SF1BR873 SFSTUDIO427 SFPOOL STOR213 SFTRASH63 SFMEN176 SFPOOL EQUIP109 SFWOMEN176 SFNOPARKINGNOPARKINGCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSNOPARKINGTURNAROUNDONLYEX. MHRIM=880.00EX IE(N)=875.60EX IE (W)=873.40EX IE (E)=873.20PROP IE (S)=873.60CORE DRILL AND USE BOOT FOR NEWCONNECTION TO EXISTING MH17 LF 18" RCPSTORM @ 0.50%177 LF 18" RCPSTORM @ 0.50%30 LF 15" RCPSTORM @ 0.53%MH 1RIM=880.42IE=873.69MH 2RIM=882.04IE=874.588 LF 12" CMPSTORM @ 2.00%MH 3RIM=883.04IE (S-6"DT)=874.74IE (S-12")=879.98IE (N)=874.7412" OUTLETIE=880.14UNDERGROUND FILTRATIONSYSTEM 1A272 LF (4 ROWS @ 68 LF) 60"PERF. CMP12" SIDE & END STONE, 30"STONE SEPARATION, 6" STONECOVER AND 24" SAND BASE.BAFFLE WALLS BETWEEN PERF.AND NON-PERF. PIPE; TOPBAFFLE WALLS=878.74IE 60" CMP=876.74OE 12" ORIFICE=880.14TOP 60" CMP=881.746" DT IE=874.74100-YR HWL=881.28CLEANOUTDT IE=874.74CB/ACCESS RISER 11RIM=883.24CB/ACCESS RISER 12RIM=883.24ACCESS RISER,TYP.ACCESS RISER,TYP.ACCESS RISER,TYP.6" DIP FIRE SERVICE ANDVALVE, STUB TO WITHIN5' FROM BUILDING,COORD. W/MECH'LPROPOSED GATEVALVE AND VALVE BOXMAKE WET TAPCONNECTION TOEXISTING WATERMAIN, COORD.WITH CITYSTUB SANITARY TO 5'FROM BUILDINGIE @ STUB=866.81COORD. W/MECH'L18 LF 8" PVC SDR 26SANITARY SERVICE@ 1.00%MAKE CONNECTION TOEXISTING 15" RCPSANITARY SEWEREX IE 15" (N/S)=866.33(FIELD VERIFY)PROP IE (W)=866.63COORDINATE WITH CITYCLEANOUTDT IE=872.8047 LF 12" RCPSTORM @ 0.64%25 LF 12" CMPSTORM @ 1.00%MH 21RIM=880.41IE (S-6"DT)=872.80IE (S-12")=877.55IE (N)=872.8012" OUTLETIE=877.80EX. MHRIM=880.83EX IE(W/E)=872.00PROP IE (S)=872.50CORE DRILL AND USE BOOTFOR NEW CONNECTION TOEXISTING MHCLEANOUTDT IE=872.80UNDERGROUND INFILTRATIONSYSTEM 2152 LF (1 ROW @ 152 LF) 54"PERF. CMP12" SIDE & END STONE, 6"STONE COVER AND 24" SANDBASE.IE 48" CMP=874.80OE 12" ORIFICE=877.80TOP 48" CMP=878.806" DT IE=872.80100-YR HWL=878.33ACCESS RISER,TYP.STUB STORM TO 5'FROM BUILDINGIE @ STUB = 878.78COORD. W/ MECH'L12" INLETIE=878.742 LF 12" PVCSDR 26 @ 2.00%BAFFLE WALL, TYP.TOP=878.84STUB STORM TO 5'FROM BUILDINGIE @ STUB = 876.84COORD. W/ MECH'L12" INLETIE=876.802 LF 12" PVCSDR 26 @ 2.00%RIM=884.61SEE ARCH'L ANDMECH'L PLAN FOR LOWPOINTS OVER BUILDINGRIM=884.63SEE ARCH'L ANDMECH'L PLAN FOR LOWPOINTS OVER BUILDINGRIM=884.43SEE ARCH'L ANDMECH'L PLAN FOR LOWPOINTS OVER BUILDINGRIM=884.43SEE ARCH'L ANDMECH'L PLAN FOR LOWPOINTS OVER BUILDINGRIM=882.81SEE ARCH'L ANDMECH'L PLAN FOR LOWPOINTS OVER BUILDINGRIM=884.78SEE ARCH'L ANDMECH'L PLAN FOR LOWPOINTS OVER BUILDINGRECONSTRUCT ALLEXISTING CASTINGS TOREMAIN TO BE FLUSHWITH PROPOSED GRADE4" DIP WATER SERVICEAND VALVE, STUB TOWITHIN 5' FROM BUILDING,COORD. W/MECH'LFDC LOCATION,COORD. W/MECH'LRECONSTRUCT EXISTING CASTING,UTILIZE A VALLEY GUTTER CASTINGPER CITY STANDARDSRECONSTRUCT EXISTINGCASTING, UTILIZE AVALLEY GUTTER CASTINGPER CITY STANDARDSEX.MET COUNCILSANITARY SEWERLOCATION, CONTRACTORTO FIELD VERIFYUNDERGROUND FILTRATIONSYSTEM 1B147.5 LF (3 ROWS @ 22.5 LF & 1ROW @80 LF) 60" PERF. CMP12" SIDE & END STONE, 30"STONE SEPARATION, 6" STONECOVER AND 24" SAND BASE.BAFFLE WALLS BETWEEN PERF.AND NON-PERF. PIPE; TOPIE 60" CMP=876.74OE 18" ORIFICE=876.74TOP 60" CMP=881.74100-YR HWL=881.38CLEANOUTDT IE=874.74MH 31RIM=883.84IE W (18" OUTLET)=876.74IE S (18" INLET)=870.0041 LF 18" SDR 26 PVCSTORM @ 0.00%MH 32RIM=883.96IE N (18" OUTLET)=870.00IE W (18" INLET)=876.746 LF 18" SDR 26 PVCSTORM @ 0.00%5 LF 18" SDR 26 PVCSTORM @ 0.00%18" OUTLETIE=876.7418" INLETIE=876.7433 LF 30" STEELCASING PIPEIE=869.50RIM=884.39SEE ARCH'L ANDMECH'L PLAN FOR LOWPOINTS OVER BUILDING1. SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT.2. ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONSAND LAYOUT OF ALL SITE ELEMENTS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING BUT NOTLIMITED TO, LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED PROPERTY LINES,TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES, EASEMENTS, SETBACKS, UTILITIES, BUILDINGS AND PAVEMENTS.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FINAL LOCATIONS OF ALL ELEMENTS FOR THE SITE. THECONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONSFROM THE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IF ANY EXISTINGUTILITY LOCATIONS OR DEPTHS WILL NEED TO BE ADJUSTED FOR CONSTRUCTION TO SATISFYMINIMUM SEPARATION AND DEPTH REQUIREMENTS. REVISIONS AND RELOCATIONS THAT AREREQUIRED DUE TO SITE VERIFICATION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE AT OWNER'SEXPENSE. ANY REVISIONS REQUIRED AFTER COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION, DUE TOLOCATIONAL ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE CORRECTED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER.ADJUSTMENTS TO THE LAYOUT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTPRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF MATERIALS. STAKE LAYOUT FOR APPROVAL.3. ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONECALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILTIES THAT AREDAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.4. UTILITY INSTALLATION SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARDSPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION" AND "SANITARY SEWER ANDSTORM SEWER INSTALLATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OFMINNESOTA (CEAM), AND SHALL CONFORM WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY AND THEPROJECT SPECIFICATIONS.5. CASTINGS SHALL BE SALVAGED FROM STRUCTURE REMOVALS AND RE-USED OR PLACED AT THEDIRECTION OF THE OWNER.6. ALL WATER PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 52 DUCTILE IRON PIPE (DIP) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.7. ALL SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE SDR 26 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.8. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE HDPE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.9. PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ARE FROM CENTER TO CENTER OF STRUCTURE OR TO END OF FLAREDEND SECTION.10. UTILTIES ON THE PLAN ARE SHOWN TO WITHIN 5' OF THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT. THECONTRACTOR IS ULTIMATELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FINAL CONNECTION TO BUILDING LINES.COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECTURAL AND MECHANICAL PLANS.11. CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCHBASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.15 FEET PER DETAILS. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THISPLAN DO NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS.12. ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED 5 FEET BEHIND BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED.13. HYDRANT TYPE, VALVE, AND CONNECTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS.HYDRANT EXTENSIONS ARE INCIDENTAL.14. A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET OF COVER IS REQUIRED OVER ALL WATERMAIN, UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED. EXTRA DEPTH MAY BE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICALSEPARATION TO SANITARY OR STORM SEWER LINES. EXTRA DEPTH WATERMAIN IS INCIDENTAL.15. A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10 FEET OF HORIZONTAL SEPARATIONIS REQUIRED FOR ALL UTILITIES, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.16. ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY STANDARDS ANDCOORDINATED WITH THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.17.CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING STRUCUTRES SHALL BE CORE-DRILLED.18. COORDINATE LOCATIONS AND SIZES OF SERVICE CONNECTIONS WITH THE MECHANICALDRAWINGS.19. COORDINATE INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING OF THE INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES WITHADJACENT CONTRACTORS AND CITY STAFF.20. ALL STREET REPAIRS AND PATCHING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THECITY. ALL PAVEMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE SAWCUT. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL BEPROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THEMINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THISSHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS, AND FLAGGERS ASNEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURESSHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY.21. ALL STRUCTURES, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE, SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO PROPOSED GRADES WHEREREQUIRED. THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL OWNERS MUST BE COMPLIED WITH. STRUCTURES BEINGRESET TO PAVED AREAS MUST MEET OWNERS REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC LOADING.22. CONTRACTOR SHALL CORDINATE ALL WORK WITH PRIVATE UTILITY COMPANIES.23. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE CONNECTION OF IRRIGATION SERVICE TO UTILITIES.COORDINATE THE INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SLEEVES NECESSARY AS TO NOT IMPACTINSTALLATION OF UTILITIES.24. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN AS-BUILT PLANS THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND SUBMITTHESE PLANS TO ENGINEER UPON COMPLETION OF WORK.25.ALL JOINTS AND CONNECTIONS IN STORM SEWER SYSTEM SHALL BE GASTIGHT OR WATERTIGHT.APPROVED RESILIENT RUBBER JOINTS MUST BE USED TO MAKE WATERTIGHT CONNECTIONS TOMANHOLES, CATCHBASINS, OR OTHER STRUCTURES.GENERAL UTILITY NOTES:MANHOLE OR CATCH BASINWATER MAINUTILITY LEGEND:SANITARY SEWERSTORM SEWERCITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK UTILITY NOTES:1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC UTILITY NOTES.MANHOLE OR CATCH BASINCATCH BASIN4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.comMatt Pavek Pat Sarver763-213-3944 952-250-2003COPYRIGHT 2015 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONPARKWAY APARTMENTS 4001 & 4025 HIGHWAY 7, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 4915 W. 35TH STREET, SUITE #102, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 SELA GROUP, LLC PROJECT ................PROJECT NUMBER:151623/11/16CITY SUBMITTALDJRARCHITECTURE, INC333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.com7/11/16PUD RESUBMITTAL..4/18/16PUD RESUBMITTAL6/14/16PUD RESUBMITTAL01" = 20'-0"20'-0"10'-0"NREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC4.0UTILITY PLAN............GOPHER STATE ONE CALLWWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG(800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE(651) 454-0002 LOCAL44263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.6/14/16City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8d) Title: Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page 27 City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8d) Title: Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page 28 OWNERCONTRACTORDORAN COMPANIES7803 GLENROY RD #200,MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55439952.288.2000ARCHITECTDJR ARCHITECTURE, INC.333 WASHINGTON AVENUE NUNION PLAZA, SUITE 210MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401CONTACT: Sheldon Berg(612) 676-2719(612) 676-2796 (fax)sberg@djr-inc.comSTRUCTURALMECHANICALCIVILPARKWAY 25, LLC4915 W 35TH ST, #102SAINT LOUIS PARK, MN55416952.925.3878LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTPROJECT PARTICIPANTSCIVIL SITE GROUP4931 W 35TH ST SUITE 200ST LOUIS PARK, MN 55416612.615.0060psarver@civilsitegroup.comERICKSEN ROED ANDASSOCIATES2550 UNIVERSITY AVE WST PAUL, MN 55114651.251.7570TBDCONFLUENCE530 N 3RD ST #120MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401CONTACT: Terry Minarik(612) 333-3702tminarik@thinkconfluence.comELECTRICALEMMANUELSON-PODAS, INC.7705 BUSH LAKE ROAD,EDINA, MN 55439952.930.0050UNIT SUMMARYTYPE LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 LEVEL 5 TOTALSTUDIO2 000021 BEDROOM 3 12 12 12 11 501+ BEDROOM04444162 BEDROOM 1 11 11 11 9 43TOTALS627272724111PROJECT NOTES1. All work shall comply with all applicablestate and local codes and ordinances.2. Work is to be completed in accordancewith all documents including drawings,specifications, and conditions ofcontract for work.3. Refer to complete set of issuedcontract documents including drawingsand specifications of all disciplines forapplicable notes, abbreviations, andsymbols. Contractor is responsible forcoordination of work. Notify Architectof any discrepancies beforeproceeding with work.4. Food service for coordination only.Food service equipment and installationnot in contract.UNIT TYPE SUMMARYTYPE NET SF GROSS SF LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2-4 LEVEL 5 TOTALSTUDIOS1 734 SF 840 GSF1001S2 430 SF 475 GSF10011 BEDROOMA1 640 SF 699 GSF0103A2 658 SF 712 GSF03312A3a 679 SF 746 GSF1001A4 739 SF 807 GSF05015A5 814 SF 880 GSF03312A5a 845 SF 945 GSF2001A5b 819 SF 906 GSF2001A6 873 SF 944 GSF0022A7 880 SF 950 GSF0022A10 925 SF 1014 GSF00111+ BEDROOMA3 767 SF 834 GSF0228A8 901 SF 968 GSF0114A9 890 SF 967 GSF01142 BEDROOMB1 1008 SF 1082 GSF0114B2 995 SF 1090 GSF0103B3 1056 SF 1153 GSF0114B4 1314 SF 1411 GSF0022B5 1108 SF 1210 GSF0206B6 1185 SF 1264 GSF0114B7 1183 SF 1266 GSF0206B8 1209 SF 1301 GSF0011B9 1196 SF 1275 GSF0228B9a 1258 SF 1337 GSF1001B10 1295 SF 1409 GSF0114TOTALS 6 27 24 111FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) CALCULATIONSNAMEAREASITE1.57 ACRES (68,565.28 SF)GROSS BUILDING142,821 SFGROSS FOOTPRINT 23,329 SFFAR2.08GFAR0.34UNITS/ACRE (111/1.57) 71 UNITS/ACREBUILDING AREA SUMMARYLEVEL GSFLEVEL -1 56,099 SFLEVEL 1 23,329 SFLEVEL 2 30,337 SFLEVEL 3 30,337 SFLEVEL 4 30,337 SFLEVEL 5 28,481 SFTOTALS198,920 SFPARKING 56,099 SFRESIDENTIAL134,321 SFCOMMERCIAL 8,500 SFPARKING AND BIKE RACK CALCULATIONSUNITCOUNTBR/UNIT BEDROOMS TOTAL PARKINGSTUDIO21221 BEDROOM66166662 BEDROOM4328686TOTAL111154154TOTAL RESIDENTIAL PARKING PROVIDED154TOTAL RESIDENTIAL PARKING REQUIRED154OFFICE AREA= 5,000 GSFPARKING REQ= 1 STALL/200 GSFTOTAL OFFICE PARKING REQUIRED 5,000/200 25RESTAURANT=3,500 GSFPARKING REQ= 1 STALL/ 60 GSFTOTAL RESTAURANT REQUIRED 3,500/6058REDUCTION IN PARKING FOR TRANSIT (10% OF REQUIRED SPACES)-8TOTAL COMMERCIAL PARKING PROVIDED75TOTAL COMMERCIAL PARKING REQUIRED75GRAND TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED229GRAND TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED229RESIDENTIAL BIKE RACKS REQUIRED= 1 PER UNIT + 1/10 PARKING STALLS 111 + (154/10)127COMMERCIAL BIKE RACKS REQUIRED= 1/10 PARKING STALLS(83/10)8TOTAL BIKE RACKS REQUIRED135TOTAL BIKE RACKS PROVIDED (131 AT LEVEL -1, 14 AT LEVEL 1) 145TRASH/ RECYCLING AREAMN BUILDING CODE 1303.1500GROSS PARKING: 56,099 x .001 = 56GROSS RESIDENTIAL: 134,321 x .0025 = 336GROSS COMMERCIAL: 8,500 x .001 = 9AREA REQUIRED: 401 SFAREA PROVIDED: 1037 SFhttps://www.revisor.mn.gov/rules/?id=1303.1500LOCATION MAPSITE LOCATIONARCHITECTURE, INCCopyright 2015 DJR Architecture, IncB8333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.comPRINT NAMESIGNATUREREGISTRATION NUMBER DATECLIENTPARKWAY 25, LLC4915 W 35th St, #102Saint Louis Park, MN 55416952.925.3878Issue:Date:Project #:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:CONTRACTORDORAN COMPANIES7803 Glenroy Rd #200,Minneapolis, MN 55439952.288.2000STRUCTURALERICKSEN ROED AND ASSOCIATES2550 University Avenue WSt Paul, MN 55114651-251-7570CIVILCIVIL SITE GROUP4931 W 35th St. Suite 200Saint Louis Park, MN 55416612-615-0060I hereby certify that this plan, specification,or report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Architect under the laws of theState of Minnesota.PRELIMINARY; NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONACDEFGH7654321LANDSCAPECONFLUENCE530 N 3RD St #120Minneapolis, MN 55401612 333-3702G000COVER SHEET4001 & 4025 Highway 25 Saint Louis Park, MNApprover07/11/201615-06607/11/2016APSBPARKWAY 25Designer PARKWAY 2515-066.00SAINT LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTASHEET INDEX - GENERALG000 COVER SHEETG100 LIFE SAFETYG200 LIFE SAFETYG300 LIFE SAFETYSHEET INDEX - ARCHITECTURALA100P FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL -1 (PLANNING)A110P FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 1 (PLANNING)A120P FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 2-4 (PLANNING)A150P FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 5 (PLANNING)A160P ROOF PLAN (PLANNING)A200 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSA201 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSA300P BUILDING SECTIONSAS100 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLANSHEET INDEX - CIVILC0.0 TITLE SHEETC0.1 SITE SURVEYC0.2 PRELIMINARY PLATC1.0 REMOVALS PLANC2.0 SITE PLANC3.0 GRADING PLANC4.0 UTILITY PLANC5.0 DETAILSC5.1 DETAILSC5.2 DETAILSSW1.0 SWPPP - EXISTING CONDITIONSSW1.1 SWPPP - PROPOSED CONDITIONSSW1.2 SWPPP - NARRATIVE AND DETAILSSHEET INDEX - LANDSCAPEL100 TREE PRESERVATION AND REPLACEMENT PLANL200 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLANL500 LANDSCAPE DETAILSHUD Preliminary Submittal03/4/2016PUD Submittal03/14/2016PUD Resubmittal04/18/2016PUD Second Resubmittal05/12/2016Design Development/ Pricing5/18/2016PUD Third Resubmittal6/15/2016PUD Fourth Resubmittal07/11/2016City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8d) Title: Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page 29 FDFDFDFDFDFDFDFDFDFDFDFDFDFDFDFD1AACCEEF21063GHKLMNZAZBZCZDZEZF97Z3Z4ZZZ54DDZ2BB18' - 0"24' - 0"91' - 0"18' - 0"42' - 0"18' - 0"24' - 0"10' - 0"F3A300PB1A300P190' - 7 1/2"62' - 5 1/2"45' - 8"298' - 9"8J1920303536444564100111117137138158CCCCCC1CCC29PARKING158 SPACES104' - 6"194' - 3"298' - 9"12' - 6"11' - 0"27' - 6"95' - 6 25/32"66' - 5 7/32"ElectricVehicleChargingStationBIKE REPAIRELECTRICAL& MAKE UPAIREPFIRST FLOORABOVELEVEL 2-5ABOVEMAINTENANCEWATER/SPRINKLERCARWASHCTWALL MOUNTEDBIKE RACK, TYP.WALL MOUNTEDSTORAGE AT THEHEAD OF EACHSTALL, TYP.RGARAGE ACCESS RAMPPROPERTYLINESTORAGE,TYPRAMP UPAREAWELLELEVLOBBYCCCCZ6Z7CCZ85656667838499116115132 133H1A300POWNERSTORAGEBIKERACKSTENANT STORAGEZ1TENANT STORAGE14314411211431' - 1"FIRST FLOORABOVELEVEL 2-5ABOVETSTORAGEFIRST FLOORABOVEPOOL ABOVEHOT TUBABOVEBEAMABOVE86878.75.1ZG2 ' - 0 "2' - 0"DOGWASH215' - 0"ARCHITECTURE, INCCopyright 2015 DJR Architecture, IncB8333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.comPRINT NAMESIGNATUREREGISTRATION NUMBER DATECLIENTPARKWAY 25, LLC4915 W 35th St, #102Saint Louis Park, MN 55416952.925.3878Issue:Date:Project #:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:CONTRACTORDORAN COMPANIES7803 Glenroy Rd #200,Minneapolis, MN 55439952.288.2000STRUCTURALERICKSEN ROED AND ASSOCIATES2550 University Avenue WSt Paul, MN 55114651-251-7570CIVILCIVIL SITE GROUP4931 W 35th St. Suite 200Saint Louis Park, MN 55416612-615-0060I hereby certify that this plan, specification,or report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Architect under the laws of theState of Minnesota.PRELIMINARY; NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONACDEFGH7654321LANDSCAPECONFLUENCE530 N 3RD St #120Minneapolis, MN 55401612 333-3702A100PFLOOR PLAN - LEVEL -1 (PLANNING)4001 & 4025 Highway 25 Saint Louis Park, MNApprover07/11/201615-06607/11/2016AuthorCheckerPARKWAY 25Designer 3/32" = 1'-0"B1FLOOR PLAN- LEVEL -1NHUD Preliminary Submittal03/4/2016PUD Submittal03/14/2016PUD Resubmittal04/18/2016PUD Second Resubmittal05/12/2016PUD Third Resubmittal6/15/2016PUD Fourth Resubmittal07/11/2016City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8d) Title: Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page 30 UPUPUPUPUPUPA200E1A200H1A201H5A200E5Fitness1,290 SFCommunity1,835 SFM121 SFW128 SFOffice230 SFBusinessConference214 SFLobby3,242 SFA201D3A201H3A201E1A200F4Janitor34 SFCommercial3,316 SFPOOLHOT TUBMail160 SFF3A300PB1A300P31 PARKING SPACES140' - 1 3/4"24' - 8"41' - 2"156' - 1"65' - 10"SETBACK14' - 1 1/32"SETBACK19' - 6"SETBACK47' - 7 7/8"AREA WELL105' - 4"PROPERTYLINELEVEL 2ABOVELEVEL 2ABOVE1 3 ' - 6 " 4 6 ' - 5 1 /4" 5 ' - 0 "GARAGE ACCESS RAMP25 PARKINGSPACES263' - 1"EAST STAIRWEST STAIRH1A300P137' - 4"48' - 10 15/32"TRANSFORMERTRASH CHUTESSETBACK23' - 5 5/8"SETBACK72' - 11 3/4"S ET B AC K17' - 4 "ZERO LOT LINEEXTERIOR PATIO111619163113 1425Commercial 24,722 SFStudio742 SFEXTERIOR PATIO110(4) INVERTED U STYLEBIKE PARKINGCVEHICLE SHARESERVICE10 152BR1,252 SF1BR665 SF1BR849 SF1BR873 SFPARKINGBELOWStudio427 SFCC CPool Storage213 SF(3) INVERTED U STYLEBIKE PARKINGCCACCESS ALLEYPARKING BELOWRAILINGRAILING5'-0" FENCE5,000 GSF3,500 GSFCTRELLISLEVEL 2ABOVETRASH63 SFBAR23 24HENNEPIN COUNTYSIGNAL BOX TO BERELOCATEDArea WellTRENCHDRAINTRANSFORMERMen176 SFPool Equip109 SFWomen176 SFSETBACK17' - 6"DOG PARKSETBACK70' - 11 1/2"SETBACK69' - 3 1/2"15.0%5.0%4.2%4.2%NANAWALLSRESTRICTED ACCESSGATEARCHITECTURE, INCCopyright 2015 DJR Architecture, IncB8333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.comPRINT NAMESIGNATUREREGISTRATION NUMBER DATECLIENTPARKWAY 25, LLC4915 W 35th St, #102Saint Louis Park, MN 55416952.925.3878Issue:Date:Project #:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:CONTRACTORDORAN COMPANIES7803 Glenroy Rd #200,Minneapolis, MN 55439952.288.2000STRUCTURALERICKSEN ROED AND ASSOCIATES2550 University Avenue WSt Paul, MN 55114651-251-7570CIVILCIVIL SITE GROUP4931 W 35th St. Suite 200Saint Louis Park, MN 55416612-615-0060I hereby certify that this plan, specification,or report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Architect under the laws of theState of Minnesota.PRELIMINARY; NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONACDEFGH7654321LANDSCAPECONFLUENCE530 N 3RD St #120Minneapolis, MN 55401612 333-3702A110PFLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 1 (PLANNING)4001 & 4025 Highway 25 Saint Louis Park, MNApprover07/11/201615-06607/11/2016AuthorCheckerPARKWAY 25Designer 3/32" = 1'-0"B1FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 1NHUD Preliminary Submittal03/4/2016PUD Submittal03/14/2016PUD Resubmittal04/18/2016PUD Second Resubmittal05/12/2016PUD Third Resubmittal6/15/2016PUD Fourth Resubmittal07/11/2016City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8d) Title: Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page 31 UPA200E1A200H1A201H5A200E565' - 0"157' - 0 1/2"65' - 0"33' - 6 9/32"166' - 7 3/4"A201D3A201H3A201E1A200F42BR1,183 SF2BR1,106 SF1BR658 SF1BR811 SF1BR767 SF1BR658 SF2BR1,182 SF2BR1,056 SF2BR996 SF1BR739 SF2BR1,195 SF2BR1,195 SF1BR739 SF1BR810 SF1BR740 SF1BR643 SF1BR739 SF1BR739 SF2BR1,295 SF1BR658 SF1BR889 SF1BR808 SF2BR1,179 SF2BR1,106 SF2BR1,007 SF1BR767 SF1BR900 SFF3A300PB1A300PH1A300P5' - 4"ZERO LOT LINEZERO LOT LINE144' - 11 3/8"48' - 10 19/32"56' - 11 13/32"45' - 8"SETBACK14' - 9 3/4"ALUMINIUM BALCONY5'-6" DEPTH, TYP.139' - 8 1/4"SETBACK43' - 3 3/4"SETBACK48' - 8"SETBACK18' - 6 5/8"SETBACK23' - 9 7/8"SETBACK19' - 9 31/32"SETBACK55' - 4 3/4"SETBACK53' - 4 1/4"SETBACK48' - 4 1/4"S ET B AC K4' - 0 "287'-0 1/2"ARCHITECTURE, INCCopyright 2015 DJR Architecture, IncB8333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.comPRINT NAMESIGNATUREREGISTRATION NUMBER DATECLIENTPARKWAY 25, LLC4915 W 35th St, #102Saint Louis Park, MN 55416952.925.3878Issue:Date:Project #:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:CONTRACTORDORAN COMPANIES7803 Glenroy Rd #200,Minneapolis, MN 55439952.288.2000STRUCTURALERICKSEN ROED AND ASSOCIATES2550 University Avenue WSt Paul, MN 55114651-251-7570CIVILCIVIL SITE GROUP4931 W 35th St. Suite 200Saint Louis Park, MN 55416612-615-0060I hereby certify that this plan, specification,or report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Architect under the laws of theState of Minnesota.PRELIMINARY; NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONACDEFGH7654321LANDSCAPECONFLUENCE530 N 3RD St #120Minneapolis, MN 55401612 333-3702A120PFLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 2-4 (PLANNING)4001 & 4025 Highway 25 Saint Louis Park, MNApprover07/11/201615-06607/11/2016AuthorCheckerPARKWAY 25Designer 3/32" = 1'-0"B1FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 3NHUD Preliminary Submittal03/4/2016PUD Submittal03/14/2016PUD Resubmittal04/18/2016PUD Second Resubmittal05/12/2016PUD Third Resubmittal6/15/2016PUD Fourth Resubmittal07/11/2016City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8d) Title: Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page 32 FDFDFDFDA200E1A200H1A201H5A200E51BR872 SF1BR880 SF1BR658 SF1BR767 SF1BR811 SF2BR1,183 SF1BR658 SF2BR1,056 SF2BR926 SF2BR1,314 SF2BR1,208 SF2BR1,313 SF2BR1,296 SF1BR658 SF1BR766 SF2BR1,010 SF1BR872 SF1BR879 SF1BR811 SF1BR+904 SF1BR901 SF1BR812 SF2BR1,196 SF2BR1,196 SFA201D3A201H3A201E1A200F4F3A300PB1A300P132' - 10 1/2"65' - 0"157' - 1"64' - 10 3/4"Elec96 SFTrash/ Recycle82 SFElec65 SFTerraceTerraceTerraceTerrace159' - 10"29' - 9 25/32"139' - 6 13/32"48' - 10 19/32"61' - 10 19/32"45' - 8"ALUMINIUM BALCONY5'-6" DEPTH, TYP.Roof DeckSKYLIGHT TYP.BalconyRoof DeckRoof DeckRoof DeckH1A300PSCREEN WALLBETWEEN UNITS -CEDAR SLATS TO 8'-0"SKYLIGHT TYP.SETBACK60' - 2"SETBACK65' - 10 1/8"SETBACK55' - 5 19/32"SETBACK30' - 4 7/32"SETBACK20' - 0 3/32"SETBACK30' - 7 21/32"SETBACK24' - 3 3/8"SETBACK53' - 6 7/8"SETBACK14' - 8 1/2"SETBACK9' - 9 1/2"ARCHITECTURE, INCCopyright 2015 DJR Architecture, IncB8333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.comPRINT NAMESIGNATUREREGISTRATION NUMBER DATECLIENTPARKWAY 25, LLC4915 W 35th St, #102Saint Louis Park, MN 55416952.925.3878Issue:Date:Project #:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:CONTRACTORDORAN COMPANIES7803 Glenroy Rd #200,Minneapolis, MN 55439952.288.2000STRUCTURALERICKSEN ROED AND ASSOCIATES2550 University Avenue WSt Paul, MN 55114651-251-7570CIVILCIVIL SITE GROUP4931 W 35th St. Suite 200Saint Louis Park, MN 55416612-615-0060I hereby certify that this plan, specification,or report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Architect under the laws of theState of Minnesota.PRELIMINARY; NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONACDEFGH7654321LANDSCAPECONFLUENCE530 N 3RD St #120Minneapolis, MN 55401612 333-3702A150PFLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 5 (PLANNING)4001 & 4025 Highway 25 Saint Louis Park, MNApprover07/11/201615-06607/11/2016AuthorCheckerPARKWAY 25Designer 3/32" = 1'-0"B1LEVEL 5- PlanningNHUD Preliminary Submittal03/4/2016PUD Submittal03/14/2016PUD Resubmittal04/18/2016PUD Second Resubmittal05/12/2016PUD Third Resubmittal6/15/2016PUD Fourth Resubmittal07/11/2016City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8d) Title: Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page 33 A200E1A200H1A201H5A200E5A201D3A201H3A201E1A200F4F3A300PB1A300PH1A300P43' - 8"11' - 4 1/2"71' - 11 3/4"11' - 9 3/4"33' - 0"171' - 10"181' - 11 5/16"61' - 9 9/32"49' - 4 3/8"293' - 1"33' - 0 1/4"11' - 8 1/4"55' - 4"10' - 8"29' - 5 3/4"ROOF TOP UNITROOF TOP UNITSKYLIGHT TYP.ROOF TOPUNITSLOPESLOPESLOPESLOPEFLOOR BELOWSLOPESL O PE SL O PE S L O P E SLOPESLOPEFLOOR BELOWSLOPESLOPESLOPESLOPESLOPESKYLIGHT TYP.3'-0"x 4'-0"SLOPESKYLIGHT TYP.MAKE UP AIRTRASH CHUTEVENT, TYP.MAKE UP AIRRDRDRDRDOFRDSKYLIGHT TYP.3'-0"x 4'-0"NELEVATOROVERRUNSLOPESLOPERDOFRDOFRDOFRDOFRDOFRDRD140' - 2 5/32"4 ' - 0 "8' - 0"ARCHITECTURE, INCCopyright 2015 DJR Architecture, IncB8333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.comPRINT NAMESIGNATUREREGISTRATION NUMBER DATECLIENTPARKWAY 25, LLC4915 W 35th St, #102Saint Louis Park, MN 55416952.925.3878Issue:Date:Project #:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:CONTRACTORDORAN COMPANIES7803 Glenroy Rd #200,Minneapolis, MN 55439952.288.2000STRUCTURALERICKSEN ROED AND ASSOCIATES2550 University Avenue WSt Paul, MN 55114651-251-7570CIVILCIVIL SITE GROUP4931 W 35th St. Suite 200Saint Louis Park, MN 55416612-615-0060I hereby certify that this plan, specification,or report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Architect under the laws of theState of Minnesota.PRELIMINARY; NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONACDEFGH7654321LANDSCAPECONFLUENCE530 N 3RD St #120Minneapolis, MN 55401612 333-3702A160PROOF PLAN (PLANNING)4001 & 4025 Highway 25 Saint Louis Park, MNApprover07/11/201615-06607/11/2016AuthorCheckerPARKWAY 25Designer 3/32" = 1'-0"B1ROOF PLANHUD Preliminary Submittal03/4/2016PUD Submittal03/14/2016PUD Resubmittal04/18/2016PUD Second Resubmittal05/12/2016PUD Third Resubmittal6/15/2016PUD Fourth Resubmittal07/11/2016City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8d) Title: Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page 34 LEVEL 1100' - 0"LEVEL 2116' - 0"LEVEL 3126' - 7 7/8"LEVEL 4137' - 3 3/4"LEVEL 5147' - 11 5/8"ACET.O. PARAPET161' - 7"DBPREFINISHED METALPARAPETMETAL PANEL 1METAL PANEL 2ALUMINUM BALCONIESWITH GLASS RAILINGSSTONE VENEERPREFINISHED METALWRAPPED COLUMNCONCRETE COLUMNALUMINIUM STOREFRONTPREFINISHED METAL CANOPYT.O. OVERHANGINGROOF163' - 1 3/4"T.O SLAB @ EASTTENANT97' - 8"ABCDEFGHLEVEL 1100' - 0"LEVEL 2116' - 0"T.O. Footing87' - 7"LEVEL -188' - 8"LEVEL 3126' - 7 7/8"LEVEL 4137' - 3 3/4"TRUSS BEARING158' - 0 3/4"LEVEL 5147' - 11 5/8"6397T.O. PARAPET161' - 7"STONE VENEERMETAL PANEL 1METAL PANEL 2ALUMINUM BALCONIESWITH GLASS RAILINGSPREFINISHED METALPARAPETPREFINISHED METALPARAPET CAPCONCRETE COLUMNS85T.O. OVERHANGINGROOF163' - 1 3/4"BRICK VENEERSTUCCOT.O SLAB @ EASTTENANT97' - 8"LEVEL 1100' - 0"LEVEL 2116' - 0"LEVEL 3126' - 7 7/8"LEVEL 4137' - 3 3/4"TRUSS BEARING158' - 0 3/4"LEVEL 5147' - 11 5/8"12637T.O. PARAPET161' - 7"4PREFINISHED METALPARAPETMETAL PANEL 1PREFINISHED METALPARAPET CAPALUMINUM BALCONIESWITH GLASS RAILINGSSTONE VENEERALUMINIUM STOREFRONTMETAL PANEL 285T.O. OVERHANGINGROOF163' - 1 3/4"STUCCOSTONE VENEERT.O SLAB @ EASTTENANT97' - 8"ALUMINUM RAILINGALUMINUM RAILWITH GLASSINFILLLEVEL 1100' - 0"LEVEL 2116' - 0"LEVEL 3126' - 7 7/8"LEVEL 4137' - 3 3/4"TRUSS BEARING158' - 0 3/4"LEVEL 5147' - 11 5/8"ZAZBZCZDZEZFT.O. PARAPET161' - 7"PREFINISHED METALPARAPETPREFINISHED METALWRAPPED COLUMNSMETAL PANEL 1METAL PANEL 2ALUMINUM BALCONIESWITH GLASS RAILINGSSTONE VENEERALUMINIUM STOREFRONTCONCRETE COLUMN62' - 7"T.O. OVERHANGINGROOF163' - 1 3/4"10' - 1 1/8"10' - 7 7/8"10' - 7 7/8"10' - 7 7/8"16' - 0"ZE.6T.O SLAB @ EASTTENANT97' - 8"ZGBUILDING MATERIAL BY ELEVATIONElevation MaterialClass%ABrickClass 19.6%StoneClass 113.1%StuccoClass 111.3%GlassClass 135.4%MetalClass 230.6%Total Class 1 69.4%Total Class 2 30.6%BStoneClass 115.7%GlassClass 147.1%MetalClass 237.2%Total Class 1 62.8%Total Class 2 37.2%CStoneClass 125.8%GlassClass 147.6%MetalClass 226.6%Total Class 1 73.4%Total Class 2 26.6%DStoneClass 123.8%StuccoClass 19.5%GlassClass 137.4%MetalClass 229.3%Total Class 1 70.7%Total Class 2 29.3%EStoneClass 13.1%BrickClass 112.7%StuccoClass 123.6%GlassClass 131.9%MetalClass 228.7%Total Class 1 71.0%Total Class 2 29.0%FBrickClass 110.2%StoneClass 11.9%StuccoClass 118.1%GlassClass 140.3%MetalClass 229.5%Total Class 1 70.5%Total Class 2 29.5%GStuccoClass 141.8%GlassClass 144.0%MetalClass 214.2%Total Class 1 85.8%Total Class 2 14.2%HStuccoClass 113.5%BrickClass 124.4%GlassClass 130.5%MetalClass 131.6%Total Class 1 68.4%Total Class 2 31.6%Grand Total Class 169.2%Class 230.8%ARCHITECTURE, INCCopyright 2015 DJR Architecture, IncB8333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.comPRINT NAMESIGNATUREREGISTRATION NUMBER DATECLIENTPARKWAY 25, LLC4915 W 35th St, #102Saint Louis Park, MN 55416952.925.3878Issue:Date:Project #:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:CONTRACTORDORAN COMPANIES7803 Glenroy Rd #200,Minneapolis, MN 55439952.288.2000STRUCTURALERICKSEN ROED AND ASSOCIATES2550 University Avenue WSt Paul, MN 55114651-251-7570CIVILCIVIL SITE GROUP4931 W 35th St. Suite 200Saint Louis Park, MN 55416612-615-0060I hereby certify that this plan, specification,or report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Architect under the laws of theState of Minnesota.PRELIMINARY; NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONACDEFGH7654321LANDSCAPECONFLUENCE530 N 3RD St #120Minneapolis, MN 55401612 333-3702A200EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS4001 & 4025 Highway 25 Saint Louis Park, MNApprover07/11/201615-06607/11/2016APSBPARKWAY 25Designer 3/32" = 1'-0"H1NORTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION C- CSAH25 3/32" = 1'-0"E5WEST EXTERIOR ELEVATION A 3/32" = 1'-0"E1EAST EXTERIOR ELEVATION D-GLENHURST AVE 3/32" = 1'-0"F4NORTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION- CSAH 25HUD Preliminary Submittal03/4/2016PUD Submittal03/14/2016PUD Resubmittal04/18/2016PUD Second Resubmittal05/12/2016Design Development/ Pricing5/18/2016PUD Third Resubmittal6/15/2016PUD Fourth Resubmittal07/11/2016City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8d) Title: Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page 35 LEVEL 1100' - 0"LEVEL 2116' - 0"LEVEL 3126' - 7 7/8"LEVEL 4137' - 3 3/4"TRUSS BEARING158' - 0 3/4"LEVEL 5147' - 11 5/8"12637T.O. PARAPET161' - 7"4PREFINISHED METALPARAPETPREFINISHED METALWRAPPED COLUMNSBRICK VENEERMETAL PANEL 2METAL PANEL 1ALUMINIUM BALCONIESWITH ALUMINUM RAILINGSALUMINIUM STOREFRONT85STUCCO 1T.O. OVERHANGINGROOF163' - 1 3/4"T.O SLAB @ EASTTENANT97' - 8"LEVEL 1100' - 0"LEVEL 2116' - 0"LEVEL 3126' - 7 7/8"LEVEL 4137' - 3 3/4"TRUSS BEARING158' - 0 3/4"LEVEL 5147' - 11 5/8"6397T.O. PARAPET161' - 7"PREFINISHED METALPARAPETMETAL PANEL 1STUCCO 1ALUMINIUM BALCONIESWITH ALUMINUM RAILINGSBRICK VENEERCONCRETE COLUMN85METAL PANEL 2T.O. OVERHANGINGROOF163' - 1 3/4"92' - 7"101' - 7"T.O SLAB @ EASTTENANT97' - 8"SOLDIER COURSE13' - 0"11' - 6"102' - 0"3' - 6"LEVEL 1100' - 0"LEVEL 2116' - 0"LEVEL 3126' - 7 7/8"LEVEL 4137' - 3 3/4"TRUSS BEARING158' - 0 3/4"LEVEL 5147' - 11 5/8"ACEFGHKLMT.O. PARAPET161' - 7"DBPREFINISHED METALPARAPETMETAL PANEL 1ALUMINIUM BALCONIESWITH ALUMINUM RAILINGSSTUCCOMETAL PANEL 2STUCCO 1ALUMINIUM STOREFRONTNANAWALLCONCRETE COLUMNJT.O. OVERHANGINGROOF163' - 1 3/4"STUCCOBRICK VENEERALUMINIUM BALCONIESWITH ALUMINUM RAILINGST.O SLAB @ EASTTENANT97' - 8"LEVEL 1100' - 0"LEVEL 2116' - 0"LEVEL 3126' - 7 7/8"LEVEL 4137' - 3 3/4"TRUSS BEARING158' - 0 3/4"LEVEL 5147' - 11 5/8"ZAZBZCZDZET.O. PARAPET161' - 7"METAL PANEL 1PREFINISHED METALPARAPETSTUCCO 1ALUMINIUM BALCONIESWITH ALUMINUMRAILINGSALUMINIUMSTOREFRONTNANAWALLT.O. OVERHANGINGROOF163' - 1 3/4"T.O SLAB @ EASTTENANT97' - 8"ARCHITECTURE, INCCopyright 2015 DJR Architecture, IncB8333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.comPRINT NAMESIGNATUREREGISTRATION NUMBER DATECLIENTPARKWAY 25, LLC4915 W 35th St, #102Saint Louis Park, MN 55416952.925.3878Issue:Date:Project #:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:CONTRACTORDORAN COMPANIES7803 Glenroy Rd #200,Minneapolis, MN 55439952.288.2000STRUCTURALERICKSEN ROED AND ASSOCIATES2550 University Avenue WSt Paul, MN 55114651-251-7570CIVILCIVIL SITE GROUP4931 W 35th St. Suite 200Saint Louis Park, MN 55416612-615-0060I hereby certify that this plan, specification,or report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Architect under the laws of theState of Minnesota.PRELIMINARY; NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONACDEFGH7654321LANDSCAPECONFLUENCE530 N 3RD St #120Minneapolis, MN 55401612 333-3702A201EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS4001 & 4025 Highway 25 Saint Louis Park, MNApprover07/11/201615-06607/11/2016APSBPARKWAY 25Designer 3/32" = 1'-0"H3EXTERIOR ELEVATION F 3/32" = 1'-0"E1EXTERIOR ELEVATION H 3/32" = 1'-0"H5EXTERIOR ELEVATION E 3/32" = 1'-0"D3EXTERIOR ELEVATION GHUD Preliminary Submittal03/4/2016PUD Submittal03/14/2016PUD Resubmittal04/18/2016PUD Second Resubmittal05/12/2016Design Development/ Pricing5/18/2016PUD Third Resubmittal6/15/2016PUD Fourth Resubmittal07/11/2016City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8d) Title: Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page 36 LEVEL 2116' - 0"LEVEL -188' - 8"LEVEL 3126' - 7 7/8"LEVEL 4137' - 3 3/4"TRUSS BEARING158' - 0 3/4"LEVEL 5147' - 11 5/8"21063977.9T.O. PARAPET161' - 7"1.48GARAGEAMENITYPOOL AREA1BR1BR1BR2BR1BR1BR1BR1BR55' - 6"VIEW LINET.O. OVERHANGINGROOF163' - 1 3/4"9.97.55.97.67.46.5T.O SLAB @ EASTTENANT97' - 8"LEVEL 1100' - 0"LEVEL 2116' - 0"LEVEL -188' - 8"LEVEL 3126' - 7 7/8"LEVEL 4137' - 3 3/4"TRUSS BEARING158' - 0 3/4"LEVEL 5147' - 11 5/8"ACELMNT.O. PARAPET161' - 7"A.1DD.6BVIEW LINEVIEW LINE5' - 6"1BR1BR1BR2BR1BR1BR1BR2BR1BR1BR1BR2BR1BR1BR1BR2BR1BRCOMMERCIALGARAGEPOOL AREAT.O. OVERHANGINGROOF163' - 1 3/4"1BRM.9T.O SLAB @ EASTTENANT97' - 8"Minnesota 7Service RoadW 31st StApartmentBuildingApartmentBuildingProposed BuildingApartmentBuildingMixed-UseBuildingProposedBuildingGlenhurstAvenueFranceAvenueLEVEL 1100' - 0"LEVEL 2116' - 0"T.O. Footing87' - 7"LEVEL -188' - 8"LEVEL 3126' - 7 7/8"LEVEL 4137' - 3 3/4"TRUSS BEARING158' - 0 3/4"LEVEL 5147' - 11 5/8"T.O. PARAPET161' - 7"63' - 1"7' - 1 3/8"8' - 0"3/4"2' - 7 1/8"8' - 0"3/4"1' - 6"9' - 1 1/8"3/4"1' - 6"9' - 1 1/8"1' - 0"15' - 0"3' - 6 1/4"10' - 1 1/8"1' - 6 3/4"9' - 1 1/8"1' - 6 3/4"9' - 1 1/8"1' - 6 3/4"9' - 1 1/8"16' - 0"11' - 4"TYPICAL FOUNDATION WALL12" THICK CIP CONCRETEW.P. MEMBRANE2" RIGID INSULATION R-7.5TYPICAL GARAGE FLOOR4" CONCRETE SLABVAPOR BARRIER6" COMPACTED GRANULAR FILL12" CIP POST TENSIONCONCRETE SLABFIBER GLASS WINDOWTYPICAL WD STUD WALL5/8" TYPE X GWB3" SPRAY APPLIED INSULATION2X6 WD STUDS 16" O.C.5/8" EXTERIOR SHEATHINGBUILDING WRAPALUMINIUM PANEL SYSTEMTYPICAL MTL STUD WALL5/8" TYPE X GWB3" SPRAYED APPLIED INSULATION6" MTL STUD 16" O.C.5/8" EXTERIOR SHEATHINGBUILDING WRAP1 1/2" CONTINUOUS INSULATION1 3/8" AIR SPACE3 5/8" STONE VENEER12" CIP POST TENSIONCONCRETE SLABTYPICAL ROOF-FULLY ADHERED SINGLEPLY MEMBRANE-PREFINISHED METAL PARAPET-SLOPED RIGID INSULATION-5/8" ROOF DECKING-24" DEEP ROOF TRUSSES 24" O.C.-BLOWN-IN INSULATION- FULL HEIGHTR-49-(2) LAYERS TYPE X GWBT.O. OVERHANGINGROOF163' - 1 3/4"STONE CAPT.O SLAB @ EASTTENANT97' - 8"ARCHITECTURE, INCCopyright 2015 DJR Architecture, IncB8333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.comPRINT NAMESIGNATUREREGISTRATION NUMBER DATECLIENTPARKWAY 25, LLC4915 W 35th St, #102Saint Louis Park, MN 55416952.925.3878Issue:Date:Project #:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:CONTRACTORDORAN COMPANIES7803 Glenroy Rd #200,Minneapolis, MN 55439952.288.2000STRUCTURALERICKSEN ROED AND ASSOCIATES2550 University Avenue WSt Paul, MN 55114651-251-7570CIVILCIVIL SITE GROUP4931 W 35th St. Suite 200Saint Louis Park, MN 55416612-615-0060I hereby certify that this plan, specification,or report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Architect under the laws of theState of Minnesota.PRELIMINARY; NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONACDEFGH7654321LANDSCAPECONFLUENCE530 N 3RD St #120Minneapolis, MN 55401612 333-3702A300PBUILDING SECTIONS4001 & 4025 Highway 25 Saint Louis Park, MNApprover07/11/201615-06607/11/2016AuthorCheckerPARKWAY 25Designer 1/16" = 1'-0"F3NORTH-SOUTH SITE SECTION LOOKINGEAST 1/16" = 1'-0"H1EAST-WEST STIE SECTION LOOKINGNORTH 1" = 30'-0"G7SECTION THROUGH GLENHURSTAVENUE S 1" = 30'-0"H5SECTION THROUGH MN 7 SERVICEROADHUD Preliminary Submittal03/4/2016PUD Submittal03/14/2016PUD Resubmittal04/18/2016PUD Second Resubmittal05/12/2016Design Development/ Pricing5/18/2016PUD Third Resubmittal6/15/2016PUD Fourth Resubmittal07/11/2016 1/4" = 1'-0"B1TYPICAL WALL SECTIONCity Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8d) Title: Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page 37 RAMP DOWNPOOLMN 7 SERVICE ROADGLENHURST AVENUE SCOMMERCIAL PARKING 31 SPACESPROPERTYLINEPROPERTYLINE6 ON STREETPARKING STALLSSETBACK LEVEL 247' - 7 7/8"DOG PARKAIR EXHAUSTWELLAIR INTAKEWELLPLAZA/SEATINGTRANSFORMERTRANSFORMERLINE OFBUILDINGABOVE18' - 0"24' - 0"5'-0" FENCEMWPOOLEQUIPTYP9' - 0"RESTAURANT3500 GSF60 SPACES REQ'DAMENITYHOT TUBCOMMERCIAL 14000 GSFLOBBY/ AMMENITY1811 GSFINGLEWOOD AVENUE SPHASE IIPHASE IPHASE IIPHASE I4,000 SF COMMERCIAL45 UNITSSHARED COMMERCIAL LOT56 SPACESSTUDIO8500 SF COMMERCIAL111 UNITSVEHICLE SHARESERVICEPROPERTY LINELANDSCAPE AREAFITNESS/OFFICETENANT5000 GSF25 PARKINGSPACED REQ'D3 ON STREET PARKING SPACES1101125263233434456RESIDENTIALPHASE IIGREEN SPACEBIKEPARKINGSTORAGEALLEYPARKING PHASE ICOMMERCIAL SPACES REQ'D PHASE 1 -85 SPACES (58 RESTAURANT + 25 FITNESS) - 10% TRANSIT REDUCTION = 75 SPACES REQ'DUNDERGROUND PARKINGRESIDENTIAL- 154 SPACESCOMMERCIAL- 4 SPACESON GRADEEAST LOT - 31 SPACESWEST LOT - 25 SPACESSHARED PARKING AGREEMENT- 9 SPACESSTREET PARKINGGLENHURST - 6 SPACESCOMMERCIAL TOTALPROVIDED - 75 SPACESREQUIRED - 75 SPACESPARKING PHASE IICOMMERCIAL SPACES REQ'D PHASE 1 -85 SPACES (58 RESTAURANT + 25 FITNESS) - 10% TRANSIT REDUCTION = 75 SPACES REQ'DCOMMERCIAL SPACES REQ'D PHASE 2 -16 SPACES (16 COMMERCIAL) - 10% TRANSIT REDUCTION = 15 SPACES REQ'DTOTAL COMMERCIAL SPACES REQ'D= 90 SPACES REQ'DUNDERGROUND PARKINGCOMMERCIAL- 4 SPACESON GRADEEAST LOT- 31 SPACESWEST LOT- 56 SPACESSTREET PARKINGGLENHURST - 6 SPACESINGLEHART- 3 SPACESCOMMERCIAL TOTALPROVIDED - 100 SPACESREQUIRED - 90 SPACES2BR1292GSF2BR1202GSF1BR829GSF1BR829GSF1BR821GSFSTUDIO593GSF2BR1115SF1BR744GSF1BR744GSFGREEN ROOFRAMP DOWNPOOLMN 7 SERVICE ROADGLENHURST AVENUE SCOMMERCIAL PARKING31 SPACESPROPERTYLINE6 ON STREETPARKING STALLSSETBACK LEVEL 247' - 7 7/8"DOG PARKAIR EXHAUSTWELLAIR INTAKEWELLPLAZA/SEATINGTRANSFORMERTRANSFORMERLINE OFBUILDINGABOVE18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"5'-0" FENCEMWPOOLEQUIPTYP9' - 0"RESTAURANT3500 GSF60 SPACES REQ'DAMENITYHOT TUBINGLEWOOD AVENUE SEXISTINGPHASE IEXISTINGPHASE ISTUDIO8500 SF COMMERCIAL111 UNITSVEHICLE SHARESERVICEPROPERTY LINELANDSCAPE AREAFITNESS/OFFICETENANT5000 GSF25 PARKINGSPACED REQ'D11012BIKEPARKINGSTORAGE1325EXISTING BUILDINGCOMMERCIAL PARKING18 SPACES*20 WITH RESTRIPPINGAND ADDT'L PARKINGCOMMERCIAL PARKING10 SPACESALLEY18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"COMMERCIAL PARKING25 SPACESTYP8' - 6"COMMERCIAL PARKING25 SPACESOutdoor Recreation Plaza10,739 SFDog Park802 SFARCHITECTURE, INCCopyright 2015 DJR Architecture, IncB8333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.comPRINT NAMESIGNATUREREGISTRATION NUMBER DATECLIENTPARKWAY 25, LLC4915 W 35th St, #102Saint Louis Park, MN 55416952.925.3878Issue:Date:Project #:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:CONTRACTORDORAN COMPANIES7803 Glenroy Rd #200,Minneapolis, MN 55439952.288.2000STRUCTURALERICKSEN ROED AND ASSOCIATES2550 University Avenue WSt Paul, MN 55114651-251-7570CIVILCIVIL SITE GROUP4931 W 35th St. Suite 200Saint Louis Park, MN 55416612-615-0060I hereby certify that this plan, specification,or report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Architect under the laws of theState of Minnesota.PRELIMINARY; NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONACDEFGH7654321LANDSCAPECONFLUENCE530 N 3RD St #120Minneapolis, MN 55401612 333-3702AS100ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN4001 & 4025 Highway 25 Saint Louis Park, MNApprover07/11/201615-06607/11/2016AuthorCheckerPARKWAY 25Designer 1" = 30'-0"B1ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLANN 1" = 30'-0"F6Phase II- Level 2-5 1" = 30'-0"B4ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN 1" = 50'-0"G6DESIGNATED OUTDOOR RECREATIONAREA (DORA)PUD Second Resubmittal05/12/2016Design Development/ Pricing5/18/2016PUD Third Resubmittal6/15/2016PUD Fourth Resubmittal07/11/2016City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8d) Title: Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page 38 # Date CommentsRevisionsThese drawings are for conceptual use onlyand are not intended for construction. Valuesrepresented are an approximation generated frommanufacturers photometric inhouse or independentlab tests with data supplied by lamp manufacturers.Date:7/11/201624x36Scale: 1" = 20'Parkway 25Site LightingLS952-2064Drawn By: Joe FreySales Agent: Steve HahnScale: 1 inch= 20 Ft.RAMP DOWNPOOLMN 7 SERVICE ROADGLENHURST AVENUE SCOMMERCIAL PARKING 26 SPACESPROPERTYLINEPROPERTYLINE6 ON STREETPARKING STALLSCOMMERCIALPARKING 26SPACESSETBACK LEVEL 248' - 0"URBAN PLAZA/DROP-OFFBIKEPARKINGCOMMERCIALTRASHDOG PARKSETBACK53' - 0"AIR EXHAUSTWELLAIR INTAKEWELL5' - 0"10' - 0"PLAZA/SEATINGTRANSFORMERTRANSFORMERLINE OFBUILDINGABOVE18' - 0"25' - 0"18' - 0"5'-0" FENCEMWPOOLEQUIPTYP9' - 0"COMMERCIALTRASHOFFICEOFFICECOFFEEAMENITY9 ON STREETPARKING SPACESTRANSFORMERBARBIKEPARKINGHOTTUBCMH: 10MH: 10CCMH: 10MH: 10CCMH: 10CMH: 10CMH: 10DMH: 3.5DMH: 3.5DMH: 3.5DMH: 3.5MH: 3.5DMH: 10BBMH: 10MH: 10CCMH: 10MH: 10CDMH: 3.5MH: 3.5DEMH: 13MH: 13EEMH: 13MH: 13EMH: 13EEMH: 13MH: 13EAAAMH: 18MH: 18AAAMH: 18AAABMH: 10MH: 18AAA0.24 0.23 0.17 0.20 0.23 0.25 0.24 0.30 0.44 0.33 0.29 0.20 0.13 0.05 0.05 0.10 0.23 0.42 0.59 1.00 1.47 1.48 1.03 0.67 0.51 0.50 0.54 0.71 1.14 1.54 1.38 0.91 0.53 0.36 0.18 0.07 0.030.59 0.73 0.57 0.51 0.61 0.77 0.77 1.14 3.74 5.21 5.13 3.67 0.73 0.13 0.08 0.14 0.38 1.00 1.53 1.73 2.03 1.99 1.75 1.54 1.20 0.91 1.31 1.60 2.07 2.10 1.88 1.57 1.43 0.87 0.32 0.11 0.050.92 1.67 1.62 0.84 1.15 1.76 1.92 1.665.81 6.17 4.87 4.80 0.55 0.12 0.09 0.18 0.84 1.98 2.03 1.95 1.97 2.00 2.09 1.06 0.48 1.21 2.16 1.99 1.99 1.90 2.00 1.84 0.74 0.15 0.07 0.041.20 1.88 2.04 1.18 1.35 3.40 4.89 2.706.31 0.95 0.16 0.13 0.17 0.50 0.90 1.31 1.48 1.50 1.43 1.07 0.65 0.35 0.63 0.97 1.37 1.49 1.45 1.30 0.90 0.42 0.11 0.07 0.061.70 2.17 1.96 1.50 1.47 3.63 5.16 2.866.73 3.67 3.92 2.56 0.91 0.18 0.20 0.30 0.33 0.41 0.54 0.58 0.46 0.20 0.14 0.22 0.31 0.30 0.32 0.30 0.19 0.11 0.10 0.21 0.222.11 2.44 1.92 1.75 1.73 2.66 2.85 2.509.63 6.47 7.11 6.28 2.51 0.30 0.10 0.07 0.08 0.18 0.63 1.51 1.76 0.18 0.07 0.05 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.02 0.19 1.04 1.012.13 2.93 2.29 1.76 1.79 2.52 2.67 2.391.410.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.07 0.61 4.31 7.85 0.75 0.120.39 4.61 3.331.95 3.39 3.23 1.56 1.59 3.64 5.09 2.940.76 2.36 2.08 1.38 0.28 0.13 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.37 6.57 22.48 2.23 0.151.27 18.84 7.171.98 3.34 3.26 1.56 1.60 3.73 5.25 2.961.27 4.93 18.98 17.29 8.54 0.52 0.06 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.33 6.70 29.78 3.18 0.231.37 21.12 5.772.02 2.84 2.34 1.77 1.77 2.69 2.87 2.520.88 2.24 6.38 13.96 12.56 3.20 0.65 0.11 0.03 0.03 0.41 4.80 11.71 1.57 0.701.19 17.40 7.032.11 2.40 1.92 1.77 1.75 2.41 2.55 2.290.15 0.14 0.36 1.27 2.96 1.72 0.48 0.10 0.04 0.10 0.56 1.93 2.76 1.63 3.040.37 4.16 3.171.82 2.21 1.93 1.52 1.47 3.51 4.91 2.870.01 0.02 0.01 0.07 0.46 0.57 0.22 0.07 0.04 0.11 0.29 0.55 0.70 2.93 11.100.27 1.79 1.821.24 1.99 2.01 1.14 1.35 3.55 5.09 2.810.00 0.01 0.02 0.09 0.15 0.09 0.04 0.03 0.05 0.10 0.14 0.30 7.36 21.710.35 4.15 3.580.98 1.77 1.63 0.82 1.19 2.14 2.40 2.000.02 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.20 5.75 18.490.97 17.53 8.690.63 0.74 0.59 0.54 0.680.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.05 0.14 2.43 7.601.01 19.59 6.670.26 0.24 0.18 0.24 0.030.01 0.03 0.04 0.83 1.911.01 17.70 9.020.11 0.10 0.08 0.03 0.020.39 5.79 5.160.05 0.05 0.04 0.09 0.19 0.10 0.203.57 5.16 4.180.64 9.38 6.820.06 0.22 0.95 3.41 4.53 2.54 2.19 2.63 6.27 6.17 1.86 1.50 2.361.51 21.41 9.615.76 17.73 27.41 24.80 2.50 1.85 2.28 10.60 3.41 3.39 5.62 4.53 1.731.53 22.31 9.659.52 3.20 1.12 0.90 1.13 1.40 2.22 9.99 3.22 2.02 2.01 2.82 4.380.59 9.07 6.530.42 0.51 0.62 0.84 1.22 1.43 3.37 4.50 3.54 6.61 4.50 1.80 1.68 3.62 5.050.17 2.79 4.330.27 0.45 0.66 0.93 1.19 1.69 8.78 2.95 1.58 1.51 3.00 3.65 3.30 0.110.24 2.32 10.310.40 0.52 0.78 1.57 3.63 2.23 1.65 1.40 1.26 1.21 1.11 0.90 0.95 0.59 0.04 0.05 0.21 5.95 21.751.77 8.64 18.87 10.89 4.01 0.73 0.50 0.61 1.63 3.53 2.73 0.12 0.07 0.19 5.30 20.4916.97 13.61 2.98 0.73 0.28 1.76 12.04 12.86 0.43 0.11 0.16 1.71 9.050.55 0.17 1.44 13.29 18.16 0.49 0.08 0.06 0.79 2.2316.00 15.82 0.40 0.07 0.03 0.22 0.430.06 0.02 0.06Luminaire ScheduleSymbolQtyLabelArrangementLumensLLFDescriptionLum. WattsTotal Watts3BSINGLEN.A.0.850MaxLite - QM2AU7T350WPB 10'MH56.521169.563Calculation SummaryLabelCalcTypeUnitsAvgMaxMinAvg/MinMax/MinSiteIlluminanceFc2.6429.78LPD Area SummaryLabelAreaTotal WattsLPD0.00N.A.N.A.ParkingIlluminanceFcSite856762631.4460.0311.577.850.01157.00785.0010CSINGLEN.A.0.850LSi - XDLMB-3-LED-SS-CW-UE-BRZ-SA4-S-12'MH136.513657DSINGLEN.A.0.850LSi - XBVR-ID-LED-24-400-CW-UE-BRZ 42in MH382667ESINGLEN.A.0.850LSi - XSL2-5A-LED-50-HO-CW-120-WHT-CMT-13'MH86.4604.84AAASINGLEN.A.0.850MaxLite - QM2AU7T350PMB 18'MH56.521226.084City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8d) Title: Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page 39 City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8d) Title: Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page 40 City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8d) Title: Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page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ity Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8d) Title: Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page 42 $SULO3URMHFW/RFDWLRQ)LJXUH+?3URMHFWV???76?)LJXUHV?)LJB3URMHFW/RFDWLRQFGU3DUNZD\7UDIILF6WXG\6W/RXLV3DUN013URMHFW/RFDWLRQ1257+1RUWK/DNH6W0LQQHWRQND%OYG&6$+3URSRVHG6RXWKZHVW/573URSRVHG:/DNH6W6WDWLRQ)UDQFH$YHVW6W*OHQKXUVW$YH,QJOHZRRG$YH0LQQHDSROLV6W/RXLV3DUN&6$+)URQWDJH5G$GMDFHQW'HYHORSPHQW7KH6KRUHKDPCity Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8d) Title: Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page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ity Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8d) Title: Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page 44 6HDQ:DOWKHU3ODQQLQJ =RQLQJ6XSHUYLVRU$XJXVW &LW\RI6W/RXLV3DUN5HYLVHG3DUNZD\7UDIILF6WXG\ 3DJH 7KHIROORZLQJWUDIILFFRQWUROLVFXUUHQWO\LQSODFHDWVWXG\LQWHUVHFWLRQV  &6$+)UDQFH$YHQXH7UDIILFVLJQDO  &6$+)URQWDJH5RDG)UDQFH$YHQXH6LGHVWUHHWVWRSFRQWURO o)UDQFH$YHQXHDSSURDFKHVDUHXQFRQWUROOHG  &6$+)URQWDJH5RDG*OHQKXUVW$YHQXH8QFRQWUROOHG o7KH+LJKZD\DQG*OHQKXUVW0L[HG8VH7UDIILF6WXG\UHFRPPHQGHGWKHLPSOHPHQWDWLRQRI VWRSFRQWURORQWKHQRUWKERXQGLQWHUVHFWLRQDSSURDFK *OHQKXUVW$YHQXH   &6$+)URQWDJH5RDG,QJOHZRRG$YHQXH7KUHHZD\VWRSFRQWURO o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” ”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ity Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8d) Title: Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page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´6KRUHKDPµDQGVKRZQSUHYLRXVO\LQ )LJXUHVDQGLVORFDWHGLQWKHVRXWKHDVWTXDGUDQWRIWKH&6$+  )URQWDJH 5RDG *OHQKXUVW$YHQXH LQWHUVHFWLRQ LQ6W/RXLV3DUN7KH6KRUHKDPLV H[SHFWHG WR FRQVLVW RI DSSUR[LPDWHO\DSDUWPHQWXQLWVDQGVTXDUHIHHWRIJHQHUDOPHGLFDORIILFHVSDFHZLWK FRPSOHWLRQDQWLFLSDWHGLQODWHRUHDUO\,PSDFWVDVVRFLDWHGZLWKWKLVGHYHORSPHQWZHUH SUHYLRXVO\LGHQWLILHGDVSDUWRIWKH+LJKZD\DQG*OHQKXUVW0L[HG8VH7UDIILF6WXG\ City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8d) Title: Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page 46 6HDQ:DOWKHU3ODQQLQJ =RQLQJ6XSHUYLVRU$XJXVW &LW\RI6W/RXLV3DUN5HYLVHG3DUNZD\7UDIILF6WXG\ 3DJH 3URSRVHG'HYHORSPHQW 7KH3DUNZD\GHYHORSPHQWLVORFDWHGLQWKHVRXWKZHVWTXDGUDQWRIWKH&6$+)URQWDJH5RDG *OHQKXUVW$YHQXHLQWHUVHFWLRQLQ6W/RXLV3DUN7KHGHYHORSPHQWVLWHLVFXUUHQWO\RFFXSLHGE\WZR ODQGXVHVWKH9DOX6WD\,QQPRWHODQG9HVFLR·V&XFLQD UHVWDXUDQWFORVHGDWWKHWLPHRIWKLVVWXG\  7KHVHODQGXVHVDUHSODQQHGWREHHOLPLQDWHGE\WKHSURSRVHGGHYHORSPHQWVKRZQLQ)LJXUHZKLFK FRQVLVWVRIDSSUR[LPDWHO\DSDUWPHQWXQLWVVTXDUHIHHWRIILWQHVV\RJDVWXGLRVSDFHDQG VTXDUHIHHWRIUHVWDXUDQWVSDFH7KHUHVWDXUDQWZLOOKDYHDIRFXVRQEUHDNIDVWDQGEUXQFKEXW ZLOOEHRSHQGXULQJWKHHYHQLQJVIRUGLQQHU&RQVWUXFWLRQRIWKHSURSRVHGGHYHORSPHQWZDVDVVXPHG WREHFRPSOHWHE\WKHHQGRIWKH\HDU $FFHVVWRWKHGHYHORSPHQWLVSURSRVHGDWWKHIROORZLQJORFDWLRQV •&6$+)URQWDJH5RDGaIHHWZHVWRI*OHQKXUVW$YHQXH :HVW$FFHVV  •*OHQKXUVW$YHQXHa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ity Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8d) Title: Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page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ity Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8d) Title: Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page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·V&XFLQDZDVRSHQGXULQJ\HDUWUDIILFGDWDFROOHFWLRQIRUWKH+LJKZD\DQG*OHQKXUVW0L[HG8VH7UDIILF6WXG\  7KHDSSURYHG3ODQQHG8QLW'HYHORSPHQW 38' LQFOXGHVGZHOOLQJXQLWVDQLQFUHDVHIURPWKHGZHOOLQJXQLWVDVVXPHGIRUWKH +LJKZD\DQG*OHQKXUVW0L[HG8VH7UDIILF6WXG\  $VVXPHVSHUFHQWRIWKHOLYHZRUNXQLWVDUHVSHFLDOW\UHWDLOXVHV7KHDPSHDNKRXUUHSUHVHQWVSHUFHQWRIWKHSPSHDNKRXU City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8d) Title: Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page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ity Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8d) Title: Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page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ity Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8d) Title: Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page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ity Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8d) Title: Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page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ity Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8d) Title: Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page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ity Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8d) Title: Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page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aIHHWZHVWRI*OHQKXUVW$YHQXH :HVW$FFHVV  E *OHQKXUVW$YHQXHa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ity Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8d) Title: Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page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ity Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8d) Title: Parkway 25 - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page 56 Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: August 15, 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to approve the Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) and Preliminary and Final Plat subject to conditions as recommended by staff and set the second reading for September 6, 2016. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does City Council support the proposed PUD to allow for the 10 West End project? SUMMARY: Ryan Companies and Excelsior Group are requesting a Preliminary and Final PUD and Preliminary and Final Plat to allow construction of an 11-story, 335,710 square foot Class A office tower and a 7-level, 1,214 stall parking structure. This development is the fourth phase of the Central Park West PUD and features a 3,200 square foot ground floor coffee shop/deli, outdoor meeting space, a fitness facility, 114 space indoor bike storage room and locker rooms. The PUD is a rezoning of the property and zoning text amendment under the City’s PUD ordinance. The applicant is also requesting a Preliminary and Final Plat to subdivide the existing Outlot A into two new additions, one for the proposed North Tower and one for a future South Tower, still in concept. Public input regarding this project has been received via a joint neighborhood meeting held on May 11, 2016 and a public hearing on July 20, 2016. One St. Louis Park resident and one Golden Valley resident were in attendance at the neighborhood meeting and voiced concerns regarding increased congestion east of Highway 100 in Golden Valley. The applicant described the Travel Demand Management (TDM) measures being implemented to reduce congestion in the area. No comments were received at the public hearing. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 20, 2016. There were no attendees and the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the application (minutes attached). FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion Existing and Proposed Zoning Draft Ordinance Draft Resolution Excerpt of Planning Commission Minutes Development Plans West End AUAR- 10 West End Memo Travel Demand Management Plan Prepared by: Nicole Mardell, Associate Planner Reviewed by: Sean Walther, Planning & Zoning Supervisor Michele Schnitker, Deputy CD Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Action Agenda Item: 8e City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8e) Page 2 Title: 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat DISCUSSION REQUEST: Ryan Companies and Excelsior Group are requesting a Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat, and administrative amendment to a PUD to construct an 11-story, Class A office tower. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The proposed redevelopment site lies southwest of Highway 100 and Interstate 394. The site is designated as Phase IV of the Central Park West PUD and lies within the cities of St. Louis Park and Golden Valley. The office tower is within the City of St. Louis Park boundary, and the parking structure is primarily in Golden Valley. SITE INFORMATION: Site Area: 3.54 acres Zoning: O - Office Comprehensive Plan: O - Office Neighborhood: Blackstone Current Use: Parking Lot/Vacant Land Proposed Use: Office Proposed Zoning: PUD – Planned Unit Development SITE LOCATION MAP: SURROUNDING LAND USES: North: Six-story apartment building (under construction), future hotel, and future apartments. East: Lilac Drive, Highway 100 South: Parking, HealthPartners building West: Utica Avenue South, 1550 and 1600 Office Towers City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8e) Page 3 Title: 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat BACKGROUND: This site is designated as Phase IV of the larger Central Park West PUD approved in 2015 and already has a variety of agreements in place to control access, parking, and civic space. The 10 West End development as proposed by the applicant includes an 11-story office tower with a 1,214 space, 7-level parking structure. The parking structure is primarily located in Golden Valley, with only a small section of a skyway and loading dock in St. Louis Park. Golden Valley staff is conducting the review of the parking structure. Five additional surface parking spaces will be located to the south of the building on a private driveway. The building will connect to the Central Park West shared linear park and will provide additional bike access through the space, to the building’s bike room, fitness space, and employee locker rooms. Phase V of Central Park West is planned to expand on the proposed parking structure and include a similar office tower. The ramp is planned to be expanded to approximately 2,500 spaces with the addition of the Phase V office building. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: An Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) was conducted for the West End region in 2007 and was updated in 2013. The purpose of the AUAR was to analyze five scenarios for development in the West End and determine the impact of the development on a wide variety of environmental impacts as required by state statute. Among the environmental impacts analyzed were traffic generation and transportation improvements, impact to natural systems, and provision of utilities to the site including sewer and water. The 2007 AUAR Report identified several mitigation strategies, and most were implemented as part of the first phase of the West End Redevelopment. At that time, certain thresholds were also established in the AUAR for traffic generation, water use, and sanitary sewer use, which the City continues to monitor as each phase develops. To analyze the 10 West End application, the City hired Kimley Horn and Associates to review the AUAR and compare the impacts of the proposed land use changes to the scenario(s) previously studied. The final report from Kimley Horn and Associates dated July 7, 2016 determined that the proposed 10 West End development met the thresholds for sewer, water, and traffic and no mitigation is necessary at this time. The report did recommend further traffic study post- construction of 10 West End and prior to construction of the planned south tower and parking structure addition. A memorandum of the study findings is attached for your review. PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT ANALYSIS: Currently, the 10 West End site is legally described as an outlot. In order to construct the building and parking structure, the property identified as Outlot A is required to be platted into a lot and block description. The lot and block description proposed for this site is Lot 2, Block 1 Central Park West P.U.D No. 121 Second Addition. The location of the future south tower and parking structure addition is proposed to be platted as Outlot A, Central Park West P.U.D No. 121 Second Addition. The new Outlot A will need to be replatted before the south tower can be built. The property located to the north of the proposed 10 West End site was platted as Lot 1, Block 1 Central Park West P.U.D No. 121 on May 8, 2015 as part of the overall Central Park West Planned Unit Development. In order to suit the design of the 10 West End building, the north property line must be adjusted. This adjustment will be completed as part of the preliminary and final plat but will also require an amendment to the Central Park West PUD. As the change is less than a 10% change from the application that was approved, the amendment can be approved by the City administratively. Drainage and utility easements will be provided surrounding the parcel adjacent to the proposed right-of-way. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8e) Page 4 Title: 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Lots Lot 1, Block 1 Central Park West P.U.D No. 121 Second Addition currently has a lot area of 3.46 acres and a density of 57.5 units/acre. This lot has been approved for a six-story residential building. As part of the 10 West End application, the applicant is proposing to replat the parcel in order to adjust the lot and better suit the proposed design of the 10 West End office building. The changes to this lot result in minor changes to the PUD for Central Park West, which the City will approve administratively if City Council approves the plat. Lot 2, Block 1 Central Park West P.U.D No. 121 Second Addition will have a lot area of 3.54 acres. This lot will be the location of the proposed 10 West End, north office tower and the first phase of the parking structure (1,214 stalls). Outlot A, Central Park West P.U.D No. 121 Second Addition will have a lot area of 3.76 acres. This outlot will be the location of the future south office tower and the second phase of the parking structure, totaling approximately 2,500 stalls. The outlot will need to be replatted into a lot and block description before it is allowed to be built upon. Utility Easements The plan provides a 10-foot wide drainage and utility easement along Utica Avenue and Lilac Drive as required by the Subdivision Ordinance. No easement is proposed along the common lot line. Staff finds it is not needed, and the proposed expansion of the parking ramp would be a barrier to the extension of utilities through the area. The plat maintains easements along the south boundary of Outlot A where Metropolitan Council Environmental Services has recently constructed a sanitary sewer lift station. PUD ANALYSIS: Description The developer requests approval of the preliminary and final Planned Unit Development. Uses The proposed uses on site are 315,280 square feet of leasable office space including 3,200 square feet of some combination of retail, food service, coffee shop, or restaurant use, which will be allowed through the Planned Unit Development (PUD) rezoning. Comprehensive Plan The Comprehensive Plan and the current Zoning Map designate the site for Office. The proposed PUD would create a new zoning district and zoning regulations for uses and dimensional standards that are unique to this site and the proposed development plans. Staff finds that this site is suitable for the proposed office tower and meets many of the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. The site provides ample recreation space for employees through shared linear civic space to the north of the site, as well as a fitness space, indoor bike room, and employee locker rooms. The office use provides a service complementary to the planned improvements for the overall Central Park West Planned Unit Development and the existing commercial land use in the area. The development is consistent with previously approved redevelopment plans for the area and within the parameters of the environmental analysis for this area. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8e) Page 5 Title: 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Building and Site Design Analysis Ryan Companies plans to pursue LEED Certification for this building which aligns well with the PUD ordinance goals for building and site design. The ordinance requires the City to find that the quality of building and site design proposed will substantially enhance aesthetics of the site and implement relevant goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. In addition, the following criteria shall be satisfied: (1) The design shall consider the project as a whole, and shall create a unified environment within project boundaries by ensuring architectural compatibility of all structures, efficient vehicular and pedestrian circulation, aesthetically pleasing landscape and site features, and design and efficient use of utilities. Staff finds the plan meets this requirement. (2) The design of a PUD shall achieve compatibility of the project with surrounding land uses, both existing and proposed, and shall minimize the potential adverse impacts of the PUD on surrounding land uses and the potential adverse effects of the surrounding land uses on the PUD. Staff finds this criteria will be met. (3) A PUD shall comply with the City’s Green Building Policy. This is a condition of approval. The architect is working with Xcel Energy, Centerpoint Energy, and the City of St. Louis Park to comply. (4) The use of green roofs or white roofs and on-site renewable energy is encouraged. The plan currently features a thermoplastic polyolefin (TPO) white roof and partial green roof, planters, and patio pavers on the rooftop gathering space located above the loading dock and adjacent to the second floor conference rooms. ZONING ANALYSIS: The following table provides the development metrics. Lot 2, Block 1 and Outlot A will be rezoned to a Planned Unit Development (PUD). The proposed performance and development standards in the draft ordinance and proposed development plans will establish the development requirements for this property if approved. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8e) Page 6 Title: 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Zoning Compliance Table: Factor Required Proposed Met? Use Office Office and up to 3,200 sq. ft. of commercial Yes Lot Area 2.0 acres, or less with City Council approval 3.54 acres Yes Height No maximum with PUD 173 feet Yes Building Materials Minimum of 60% Class I materials Each Elevation: 94.6% Class I, 5.4% Class II Yes Floor Area Ratio None with PUD 2.15 Yes Ground Floor Area Ratio N/A 0.2 Yes Off-Street Parking Office between 200,000 square feet and 400,000 square feet:  1 space/300 square feet Total: 1,119 spaces 1,214 spaces in parking structure 5 parallel parking spaces Total: 1,219 spaces Yes Bicycle Parking Office:  10% of total required vehicle parking Total: 112 spaces 114 interior bike spaces in secure bike room 10 exterior bike spaces Total: 124 bike spaces Yes Open Area/DORA 12% total lot area Total: 40,705 square feet 9,975 square feet on-site 72,254 square feet off-site civic space Total: 82,229 square feet (24.5%) Yes Landscaping See Landscaping section Yes Setbacks None with PUD Front (west): Varies between 8.0’ and 10.9’ Side (south): Varies between 24.7’ to 53.4’ along the private drive Side (north): Varies between 8’ to 19.6’ along the linear civic space Rear (east): 76’ Yes Mechanical Equipment Full screening required Rooftop equipment screened by mechanical penthouse so as not visible from off-site. Yes Sidewalks Required along all streets and building frontages Provided along all streets and building frontages Yes Refuse handling Full screening required Full screening provided by loading dock Yes Transit service None required Served by routes 9, 649, 675 Yes Stormwater Management Water quality treatment and storage/rate control Provided underground and includes other best management practices Yes City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8e) Page 7 Title: 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Uses The site will be used as a multi-tenant Class A office building and meets the office land use guidance designated by the Comprehensive Plan. The affected property is currently zoned O- Office and is included in the existing Central Park West Planned Unit Development. The rezoning of this property to its own PUD will allow for conditions and requirements that fit the context and character of the individual site and the proposed development. A draft of the ordinance establishing these conditions is attached to this report. Architectural Design The plans submitted are consistent with the overall vision of the West End, former Towers at West End, and Central Park West master plans. The building is oriented along the east/west axis along the northern edge of the property. The building exteriors for 10 West End exceed the City’s minimum requirement of Class I materials, with over 60% used on each façade. The materials used are primarily brick and glass, with architectural precast spandrel panels linking glass elements on every other floor. A vertical glass element is located off-center of the building to allow for an open lobby and ground floor access to the linear civic space. Balconies are included on each level, alternating between the east and west ends of the floor plan. The building features a wood soffit on the underside of the balconies and the buildings hat. Staff asked the applicant to provide a maintenance plan to ensure the appearance of the wood over time. Height The current height limit for the Office district is 20 stories or 240 feet. The building meets this criteria at 11 stories and 173 feet and was preliminarily approved as part of the Central Park West Overall PUD. Lighting The current photometric plan meets the recommended level of 0.5-1 fc at the property line. The lighting features chosen are consistent with the architectural design of the building and are not anticipated to present a nuisance to neighboring properties. The applicant is proposing energy efficient LED lighting similar in style to the lighting in Central Park West. The building will feature architectural uplighting for aesthetic impact and to highlight the wood soffit on the underside of balconies and the building cap. Parking Parking will total 1,219 stalls with 1,214 stalls located in the attached parking structure and 5 parallel parking stalls located along an internal drive on site. An agreement has been approved and designates 110 stalls in the parking structure for use by the AC Hotel by Marriott, Phase III of Central Park West overall PUD. The applicant is also providing 114 bike parking spaces in a secure interior bike room and as well as ten exterior bike parking spaces for visitors. Access Vehicular access to the office tower occurs through two separate entrances to the parking structure. The main entrance is a private drive from Utica Avenue South and the other on Lilac Drive. The private drive becomes a one-way street after the entrance of the parking structure to limit traffic exiting the parking structure onto Lilac Drive. This change was recommended by Golden Valley staff. Pedestrian access to the site is located on Utica Avenue South, through the shared linear park and facing the private drive. Utica Avenue has recently been improved and widened. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8e) Page 8 Title: 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Loading/Service Areas The site plan shows a fully screened loading dock placed in between the office building and the parking structure. This loading dock will also house organics, trash, and recycling. Landscaping The landscape plan indicates 72 new trees and 256 shrubs. The project does not meet the City’s planting requirements but has provided a variety of alternative landscaping measures in order to meet the intent of the landscaping ordinance. These alternative measures include: a rain garden, outdoor plazas, an outdoor retail patio, rooftop landscaping, public bike racks, and artwork on the parking structure. Designed Outdoor Recreation Area (DORA) The proposed development plans illustrate DORA through the inclusion of a balcony on each level of the building, a partial green roof and amenity space located above the loading dock, and through access to the shared Central Park West linear civic space. The plan exceeds the City’s minimum 12% DORA requirements. Signage A sign plan was not submitted for review. Signs will require permits and must comply with the O- Office District standards. Utilities All small utilities will be placed underground. Utility service structures, such as a generator and transformer, will be screened completely from off-site with materials consistent with the main building facade. Per the development agreement, buildings will provide the necessary infrastructure to take advantage of existing or future fiber-optic service lines in the vicinity of the development. Public Input A joint neighborhood meeting between St. Louis Park and Golden Valley regarding the project was held on May 11, 2016. There was one St. Louis Park resident and one Golden Valley resident in attendance. The residents voiced concerns regarding traffic and the applicant described the Travel Demand Management (TDM) measures that they are taking to reduce congestion. Representatives from iHeartMedia Corporation attended and voiced concerns over the height of the building disrupting radio signal transmission from their office in the West End. The applicant is working with iHeartMedia to accommodate this concern. The City of St. Louis Park Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 20, 2016. There were no attendees and the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the application. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8e) Page 9 Title: 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat STAFF RECOMMENDATONS: Staff recommends approval of the 10 West End Preliminary and Final Plat subject to conditions recommended by staff. Staff recommends approval of the 10 West End Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development subject to the following conditions: 1. The site shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with the conditions of this ordinance, approved Official Exhibits, and City Code. 2. The on-site underground storm water management system shall be privately-owned and privately maintained. 3. All utility service structures shall be buried. If any utility service structure cannot be buried (i.e. electric transformer), it shall be integrated into the building design and 100% screened from off-site with materials consistent with the primary façade materials. 4. Prior to starting any land disturbing activities, the following conditions shall be met: a. Proof of recording the final plat shall be submitted to the City. b. Assent Form and Official Exhibits must be signed by the applicant and property owner. c. A preconstruction meeting shall be held with the appropriate development, construction, private utility, and City representatives. d. All necessary permits must be obtained. 5. Prior to issuance of building permits, the following conditions shall be met: a. The developer shall sign the City's Assent Form and the Official Exhibits. b. A Planning Development Contract shall be executed between the Developer and City that addresses, at a minimum: i. The conditions of PUD approval recommended by staff in the City Council report as applicable or appropriate. ii. The installation of all public improvements including, but not limited to: sidewalks and boulevard improvements and the execution of any necessary agreements related to the maintenance of such improvements. iii. Easements related to electronic communication and fiber infrastructure. iv. A performance guarantee in the form of cash escrow or irrevocable letter of credit shall be provided to the City of St. Louis Park in the amount of 1.25 times of the costs of all public improvements (sidewalks and boulevards), and the private site stormwater management system and landscaping. v. The developer shall reimburse City attorney’s fees in drafting/reviewing such documents. vi. The Mayor and City Manager are authorized to execute said Planning Development Contract. c. Final construction plans for all public improvements and details for private stormwater system shall be signed by a registered engineer and submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval. d. Building material samples and colors shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8e) Page 10 Title: 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat 6. The developer shall comply with the following conditions during construction: a. All City noise ordinances shall be complied with, including that there be no construction activity between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. Monday through Friday, and between 10 p.m. and 9 a.m. on weekends and holidays; or as amended. b. The site shall be kept free of dust and debris that could blow onto neighboring properties. c. Public streets shall be maintained free of dirt and shall be cleaned as necessary. d. The City shall be contacted a minimum of 72 hours prior to any work in a public street. e. Work in a public street shall take place only upon the determination by the City Engineer (or designee) that appropriate safety measures have been taken to ensure motorist and pedestrian safety. f. The developer shall install and maintain chain link security fencing that is at least six feet tall along the perimeter of the site. All gates and access points shall be locked during non-working hours. g. Temporary electric power connections shall not adversely impact surrounding neighborhood service. 7. Prior to the issuance of any permanent certificate of occupancy permit the following shall be completed: a. Public improvements, private utilities, site landscaping and irrigation, and storm water management system shall be installed in accordance with the Official Exhibits. 8. The materials used in, and placement of, all signs shall be integrated with the building design and architecture and comply with O-Office district regulations. All the above conditions have been incorporated into the ordinance, or will be incorporated into the Planning Development Contract. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8e) Page 11 Title: 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8e) Page 12 Title: 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat ORDINANCE NO. ____-16 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ST. LOUIS PARK CITY CODE RELATING TO ZONING BY CREATING SECTION 36-268-PUD 6 AS A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1601 UTICA AVENUE SOUTH THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK DOES ORDAIN: Findings Sec. 1. The City Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission (Case No. 16-25-S, 16-26-PUD) for amending the Zoning Ordinance to create a new Planned Unit Development (PUD) Zoning District. Sec. 2. The Comprehensive Plan designates this property as Office. Sec. 3. The Zoning Map shall be amended by reclassifying the following described lands from O-Office to PUD 6: Lot 2, Block 1, Central Park West P.U.D. 121, Second Addition Outlot A, Central Park West P.U.D No.121, Second Addition Sec. 4. The St. Louis Park Ordinance Code, Section 36-268 is hereby amended to add the following Planned Unit Development Zoning District: Section 36-268-PUD 6. (a) Development Plan The site shall be developed, used and maintained in conformance with the following Final PUD signed Official Exhibits: 1. C100-C102 – Survey 2. C101 – Proposed Site Plan 3. C200 – Erosion Control Plan 4. C300 – Site Plan 5. C301 – Final Phasing Plan 6. C400 – Grading Plan 7. C500 – Utility Plan 8. E100 – Photometric Plan 9. L100 – Landscape Site Plan 10. L101 – DORA Requirements 11. L200 – Layout Plan 12. L400 – Planting Plan 13. L500 – Planting Detail Sheet 14. A050 – Architectural Site Plan 15. A051 – Architectural Signage Plan 16. A100 – Floor Plan – Level 1 City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8e) Page 13 Title: 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat 17. A101 – Floor Plan – Level 2 18. A102 – Floor Plan – Level 3 & 4 (Typ. Multi) 19. A103 – Floor Plan – Level 5-10 (Typ. Single) 20. A104 – Floor Plan – Level 11 21. A105 – Floor Plan – Level 12 (Penthouse) 22. A120 – Roof Plan 23. A150 – Floor Plan - Loading Dock 24. A300 – Exterior Elevation - South 25. A301 – Exterior Elevation - West 26. A302 – Exterior Elevation - North 27. A303 – Exterior Elevation - East 28. A304 – Partial Elevations 29. A400 – Building Sections – East/West 30. A401 – Building Sections – North/South 31. Travel Demand Management Plan 32. 10 West End AUAR Memorandum 33. Zoning Map Amendment Exhibit 34. Parking Easement for Phase III Hotel 35. Preliminary Plat 36. Final Plat The site shall also conform to the following requirements: (1) The property shall be developed with 332,600 square feet of building space. (2) Parking shall be provided on-site. The parking structure located on Lot 2, Block 1, Central Park West P.U.D. 121 Second Addition will provide at least 1,214 parking stalls. One-hundred-ten of these stalls shall be shared with Phase III of Central Park West (PUD-4). (3) The maximum building height shall not exceed 175 feet and eleven stories, excluding mechanical penthouse. (4) The development site shall provide Designated Outdoor Recreation Area (DORA) through access to the outdoor amenity decks located on each floor, and through shared outdoor space on site. (b) Permitted Uses (1) Office. The conditions are as follows: Building heights shall be limited to eleven stories or 173 feet. (2) Retail. The conditions are as follows: a. No single use retail establishment over 20,000 square feet is permitted. The retail facility shall be permitted only as a part of a larger development on a single parcel which contains at least one other permitted principal use or as a part of a mixed use PUD. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8e) Page 14 Title: 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat b. Access shall be to a roadway identified in the comprehensive plan as a collector or arterial or shall be otherwise located so that access can be provided without generating significant traffic on local residential streets. c. All refuse shall meet the requirements of chapter 22 regulating refuse. (2) Restaurants without intoxicating liquor license. The conditions are as follows: a. This use shall be permitted as part of a larger development which contains at least one other principal use or as part of a PUD. b. These uses shall not result in any exterior building modifications, including truck docks or freestanding signage, overnight truck parking or similar features. c. Retail uses shall be integrated with other principal land uses which are within the O district and shall not exceed ten percent of the gross floor area of the building. e. If there is a wine and/or beer license, the following additional conditions shall apply: 1. There shall be no separate bar area within the restaurant. 2. If the conditions in subsections (c)(15)a.--(c)(15)e. of this section are not met, a restaurant with a wine and/or beer license may apply for a major amendment to a Planned Unit Development under section 36-194(d)(4), provided that the parking requirements for a restaurant with intoxicating liquor license are met. (c) Accessory Uses Permitted accessory uses are as follows: (1) Parking lots. (2) Parking structures. Facades that are visible from off-site shall display and integration of building materials, building form, textures, architectural motifs, and building colors with principal building. (3) Public transit stops/shelters. (4) Outdoor seating, public address (PA) systems are prohibited. (5) No outdoor storage allowed. (d) Special Performance Standards (1) All general zoning requirements not specifically addressed in this ordinance shall be met, including but not limited to: outdoor lighting, architectural design, landscaping, parking and screening requirements. (2) All trash, garbage, waste materials, trash containers, and recycling containers shall be kept in the manner required by this Code. City strongly encourages all new City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8e) Page 15 Title: 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat developments to have on-site organic recycling, Garbage/recycling rooms should be sized to allow for organics recycling. All trash handling and loading areas shall be screened from view within a waste enclosure. (3) Signage shall be allowed in conformance with the approved redevelopment plan or final PUD site plan and development agreement in accordance with the following conditions: a. Pylon signs are not permitted; b. Freestanding monument signs shall utilize the same exterior materials as the principal buildings and shall not interfere with pedestrian/bicycle or automobile circulation and visibility; c. Maximum allowable number, sizes and heights of signs shall be regulated by section 36-362, O-Office requirements. (4) Façade. The following façade design guidelines shall be applicable to ground floor north, south, and west side facades. a. For street-facing facades, no more than 10% of total window and door area shall be glass block, mirrored, spandrel, frosted or other opaque glass, finishes or material including window painting and signage. The remaining 90% of window and door area shall be clear or slightly tinted glass, allowing views into and out of the interior. b. Visibility into the space shall be maintained for a minimum depth of three feet. This requirement shall not prohibit the display of merchandise. (5) Awnings. a. Awnings must be constructed of heavy canvas fabric, metal and/or glass. Plastic and vinyl awnings are prohibited. b. Backlit awnings are prohibited. Sec. 4. The contents of Planning Case File 16-25-S and 16-26-PUD are hereby entered into and made part of the public hearing record and the record of decision for this case. Sec. 5. This Ordinance shall take effect fifteen days after its publication. Public Hearing July 20, 2016 First Reading August 15, 2016 Second Reading September 6, 2015 Date of Publication September 15, 2016 Date Ordinance takes effect September 30, 2016    Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council September 6, 2016 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Approved as to Form and Execution: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Soren Mattick, City Attorney City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8e) Page 16 Title: 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat RESOLUTION NO. 16-____ RESOLUTION APPROVING PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT OF CENTRAL PARK WEST P.U.D No. 121, SECOND ADDITION 1601 UTICA AVENUE S BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of St. Louis Park: Findings 1. OP4 SLP, LLC, subdivider of the land proposed to be platted as Central Park West P.U.D No. 121, Second Addition has submitted an application for approval of preliminary and final plat in the manner required for platting of land under the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code, and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder. 2. The proposed preliminary and final plat has been found to be in all respects consistent with the City Plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and the ordinances of the City of St. Louis Park. 3. The proposed plat is situated upon the following described lands in Hennepin County, Minnesota, to-wit: Outlot A, Central Park West P.U.D No. 121 Conclusion The proposed preliminary and final plat of the Central Park West P.U.D No. 121 Second Addition is hereby approved and accepted by the City as being in accord and conformity with all ordinances, City plans and regulations of the City of St. Louis Park and the laws of the State of Minnesota, provided, however, that this approval is made subject to the opinion of the City Attorney and Certification by the City Clerk subject to the following conditions: 1. The site shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with the conditions of this ordinance, approved Official Exhibits, and City Code. 2. The on-site underground storm water management system shall be privately-owned and privately maintained. Access to the system shall be provided to the City for clean-out and inspection purposes when warranted. The developer or owner shall pay an administrative fee of $750 per violation of any condition of this approval. 3. All utility service structures shall be buried. If any utility service structure cannot be buried (i.e. electric transformer), it shall be integrated into the building design and 100% screened from off-site with materials consistent with the primary façade materials. 4. Prior to the City signing and releasing the final plat to the developer for filing with Hennepin County: a. A financial security in the form of a cash escrow or letter of credit in the amount of $1,000 shall be submitted to the City to insure that a signed Mylar copy of the final plat is provided to the City. b. A Planning Development Contract shall be executed between the City and Developer that addresses, at a minimum: City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8e) Page 17 Title: 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat i. The installation of all public improvements including, but not limited to: sidewalks, boulevards, and the execution of necessary easements related to such improvements. ii. A performance guarantee for 1.25 times the estimated costs for the installation of all public improvements, placement of iron monuments at property corners, and the private site stormwater management system and landscaping. c. The applicant shall reimburse City Attorney’s fees in drafting/reviewing such documents as required in the final plat approval. d. The Mayor and City Manager are authorized to execute the Planning Development Contract. 5. Prior to starting any land disturbing activities, the following conditions shall be met: a. Proof of recording the final plat shall be submitted to the City. b. Assent Form and Official Exhibits must be signed by the applicant and property owner. c. A preconstruction meeting shall be held with the appropriate development, construction, private utility, and City representatives. d. All necessary permits must be obtained. e. A performance guarantee in the form of cash escrow or irrevocable letter of credit shall be provided to the City of St. Louis Park for all public improvements (sidewalks, boulevards, street lights, landscaping, etc.) and the private site stormwater management system and landscaping. 6. The City Clerk is hereby directed to supply two certified copies of this Resolution to the above-named owner and subdivider, who is the applicant herein. 7. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute all contracts required herein, and the City Clerk is hereby directed to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon the said plat when all of the conditions set forth have been fulfilled. 8. Such execution of the certificate upon said plat by the City Clerk, as required under Section 26-123(1)j of the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code, shall be conclusive showing of proper compliance therewith by the subdivider and City officials charged with duties above described and shall entitle such plat to be placed on record forthwith without further formality. The City Clerk is instructed to record certified copies of this resolution in the Office of the Hennepin County Register of Deeds or Registrar of Titles as the case may be. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council September 6, 2016 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8e) Page 18 Title: 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Excerpts – Official Minutes PLANNING COMMISSION ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA JULY 20, 2016 – 6:00 p.m. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 3. Public Hearings B. 10 West Preliminary and Final PUD; Preliminary and Final Plat Location: 1601 Utica Ave. S. Applicant: The Excelsior Group and Ryan Companies Case No.: 16-25-S and 16-26-PUD Nicole Mardell, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. The PUD request is to allow construction of an 11-story Class A office tower. The building is the fourth phase of the Central Park West PUD. The plat request is to subdivide the existing Outlot A into two additions, one for the proposed North Tower and one for a future South Tower. Commissioner Robertson asked for follow-up on the two concerns raised at the neighborhood meeting. Ms. Mardell responded that the applicant suggested incorporation of a Travel Demand Management (TDM) plan and different measures, such as bike facilities, to decrease the amount of traffic onto Lilac Dr. in Golden Valley. The TDM plan will probably be produced before the first City Council meeting on this matter. Sean Walther, Planning and Zoning Supervisor, noted that as part of its approvals for the Central Park West PUD, the Golden Valley city council did require additional improvements that will be constructed later this summer. That includes expansion of a roadway underpass underneath Hwy. 100 that will allow for a trail along the south side of that area. There will also be a 3-way stop and right and left dedicated turn lanes on the Wayzata Blvd on east side of Hwy. 100. Ms. Mardell said the applicant is working with iHeartMedia Corp. to address concerns about disruption of radio signal transmission. Tony Barranco, Ryan Companies, thanked the Commission for their input at the study session. He discussed LEED certification, stormwater management and control and storm water reuse, rain gardens, and irrigation friendly landscaping. He spoke about the TDM plan. He spoke about how wellness has been incorporated into the building design. He said when 10 West End is built it will not create any interference with iHeart Media radio signal transmission, based on the tower orientation at the 1550 building. There may be some potential signal interruption when 20 West End, the second phase office building, is built. Commissioner Carper asked if there would be any exterior eating spaces. Mr. Barranco said there will be an elevated patio area with outdoor café seating sections on the south side of Central Park West. There will also be some additional tables in the lobby. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8e) Page 19 Title: 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat In response to Commissioner Robertson’s question about potential tenants Mr. Barranco said marketing feedback has been very good. They hope to have an anchor tenant in 60-90 days. Vice Chair Peilen opened the public hearing. As no one was present wishing to speak she closed the public hearing. Commissioner Carper said it is an excellent project and he appreciates the applicant taking time to meet with the Commission in a study session. Commissioner Carper made a motion to recommend approval of the Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development and Preliminary and Final Plat. Commissioner Person seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a 5-0 vote. OFFICES AT WEST END CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN UTICA AVENUE SLILAC DRIVE SGOLDEN VALLEYST. LOUIS PARKCity Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8e) Title: 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page 20 R:\Projects\700\200\700-270 West End Office Development\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\SURVEY - West End Office.dwg C100City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8e) Title: 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final PlatPage 21 R:\Projects\700\200\700-270 West End Office Development\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\SURVEY - West End Office.dwg C101City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8e) Title: 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final PlatPage 22 R:\Projects\700\200\700-270 West End Office Development\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\SURVEY - West End Office.dwg C102City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8e) Title: 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final PlatPage 23 STATE H W Y . N O . 1 0 0 UTICA AVENUE S ABCCCLILAC D R I V E S ( E X I S T I N G P R I V A T E R O A D )VAN30,800± SFPROPOSED 11-STORY OFFICE54,880± SFPROPOSED 7-LEVEL RAMP332,530± TOTAL SF373,200± TOTAL SF1,214 TOTAL PARKING STALLSTJR905-586SHEET TITLEDRAWN BYCHECKED BYJOB NO.DATESHEET NO.CREGISTRATIONNO.DATE7/8/20167/11/2016 7:48:46 AMC300R:\Projects\700\200\700-270 West End Office Development\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\SITE PLAN - West End Office.dwg JBOI hereby certify that this plan, specification,or report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer under thelaws of the State of Minnesota.SITE PLAN7002707/8/2016SITE NOTES:LEGEND:2016 RYAN A+E, INC.42340JARED OLSONISSUE RECORDISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION16/20/2016CITY SUBMITTAL27/8/2016SD SET------------------------------------------------------------------------------------PRELIM INARYNOT FORCONSTRUCTION ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------PROJECT NAMELOCATIONRYAN COMPANIES US, INC.50 South Tenth Street, Suite 300Minneapolis, MN 55403-2012612-492-4000 tel612-492-3000 faxPROJECT NAMELOCATIONRYAN A+E, INC.50 South Tenth Street, Suite 300Minneapolis, MN 55403-2012612-492-4000 tel612-492-3000 fax1601 UTICA AVENUE S,ST. LOUIS PARK, MN5541610 WEST ENDWWW.RYANCOMPANIES.COMSD SETCity Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8e) Title: 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final PlatPage 24 STATE HWY. NO. 100WAYZATABOULEVARDUTICA AVENUE SABCCCLILAC DRIVE S (EXISTING PRIVATE ROAD)VAN TJR905-586SHEET TITLEDRAWN BYCHECKED BYJOB NO.DATESHEET NO.CREGISTRATIONNO.DATE7/8/20167/8/2016 5:33:40 PMC301R:\Projects\700\200\700-270 West End Office Development\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\SITE PLAN PHASING PLAN - West End Office.dwg JBOI hereby certify that this plan, specification,or report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer under thelaws of the State of Minnesota.SITE PLAN -FINAL PHASINGPLAN7002707/8/2016SITE NOTES:LEGEND:2016 RYAN A+E, INC.42340JARED OLSONISSUE RECORDISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION16/20/2016CITY SUBMITTAL27/8/2016SD SET------------------------------------------------------------------------------------PRELIM INARYNOT FORCONSTRUCTION ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------PROJECT NAMELOCATIONRYAN COMPANIES US, INC.50 South Tenth Street, Suite 300Minneapolis, MN 55403-2012612-492-4000 tel612-492-3000 faxPROJECT NAMELOCATIONRYAN A+E, INC.50 South Tenth Street, Suite 300Minneapolis, MN 55403-2012612-492-4000 tel612-492-3000 fax1601 UTICA AVENUE S,ST. LOUIS PARK, MN5541610 WEST ENDWWW.RYANCOMPANIES.COMSD SETCity Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8e) Title: 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final PlatPage 25 12630877.31UKNWNSTATE H W Y . N O . 1 0 0 UTICA AVENUE S ABCCCLILAC D R I V E S ( E X I S T I N G P R I V A T E R O A D )VAN30,800± SFPROPOSED 11-STORY OFFICE54,880± SFPROPOSED 7-LEVEL RAMPTJR905-586SHEET TITLEDRAWN BYCHECKED BYJOB NO.DATESHEET NO.CREGISTRATIONNO.DATE7/8/20167/11/2016 8:19:24 AMC500R:\Projects\700\200\700-270 West End Office Development\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\UTILITY PLAN - West End Office.dwg JBOUTILITY PLAN7002707/8/2016UTILITY NOTES:LEGEND:I hereby certify that this plan, specification,or report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer under thelaws of the State of Minnesota.2016 RYAN A+E, INC.42340JARED OLSONISSUE RECORDISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION16/20/2016CITY SUBMITTAL27/8/2016SD SET------------------------------------------------------------------------------------PRELIM INARYNOT FORCONSTRUCTION ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BUILDING LASTING RELATIONSHIPSBUILDING LASTING RELATIONSHIPSPROJECT NAMELOCATIONRYAN COMPANIES US, INC.50 South Tenth Street, Suite 300Minneapolis, MN 55403-2012612-492-4000 tel612-492-3000 faxPROJECT NAMELOCATIONRYAN A+E, INC.50 South Tenth Street, Suite 300Minneapolis, MN 55403-2012612-492-4000 tel612-492-3000 fax1601 UTICA AVENUE S,ST. LOUIS PARK, MN5541610 WEST ENDWWW.RYANCOMPANIES.COMSD SETCity Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8e) Title: 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final PlatPage 26 E0017/8/2016R:\Projects\700\200\700-270 West End Office Development\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\PHOTOMETRIC PLAN - West End Office.dwg City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8e) Title: 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final PlatPage 27 City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8e) Title: 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page 28 City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8e) Title: 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page 29 DN UP UP GENERAL NOTES A REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR SLAB ON GRADE CONSTRUCTION, CONTROL AND ISOLATION JOINTS. B COORDINATE UNDERGROUND AND UNDER SLAB UTILITIES WITH RELEVANT TRADES PRIOR TO SLAB POUR. COORDINATE ALL SLEEVES THROUGH/UNDER FOOTING AND FOUNDATION WITH STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. C PROVIDE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS OF SIZE, TYPE, AND LOCATION AS REQUIRED BY THE FIRE MARSHAL. D DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF MASONRY OR FACE OF GYP. BD. U.N.O. E SEE SHEET A600 FOR WALL TYPE INFORMATION F SEE SHEET A601 FOR PARTITION TYPE INFORMATION G ALL WALLS TO ROOF DECK TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO ACCOMMODATE DEFLECTION OF ROOF STRUCTURE. H REFER TO STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO STRUCTURAL COMPONENT SIZES, LOCATIONS, CONFIGURATIONS, AND CAPACITIES. J ALL THRESHOLDS TO BE 1/2" HIGH MAX. K PROVIDE MOISTURE RESISTANT GYP BD. ON TOILET ROOM WET WALL AND ADJACENT TO JANITOR SINK. L PROVIDE CONTROL JOINTS IN GYP. BD. AS RECOMMENDED BY MANUFACTURER. M STAIR SUPPLIER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CODE COMPLIANCE AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY FOR ALL MATERIALS FURNISHED. N NEW PARTITIONS TO BE NOTED AND DESCRIBED AS W ALL PARTITION TYPES. O SUBCONTRACTOR TO VERIFY DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS. ANY OMISSIONS, DISCREPANCIES, OR CONFLICTS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE DESIGN-BUILDER IMMEDIATELY. P DIMENSIONS ARE 4'-0" ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR AND FROM FACE OF FINISHED PARTITION. Q DRAWINGS SHOULD NOT BE SCALED - DIMENSIONS GOVERN. LARGE SCALE DRAWINGS GOVERN OVER SMALL SCALE DRAWINGS. R THE TYPICAL DIMENSION FROM THE HINGE SIDE OF A DOOR OPENING IS TO THE FACE OF ADJACENT PERPENDICULAR WALL IS 3" U.N.O. S W HEREVER A PENETRATION OCCURS IN A FIRE-RATED ENCLOSURE SUCH AS WALLS OR SLABS, THE SPACE AROUND THE PENETRATION SHALL NOT EXCEED 1/2", SHALL BE PACKED WITH SOLID MINERAL WOOL (OR EQUAL), AND SHALL BE CLOSED OFF WITH A TIGHT FITTING ESCUTCHEON PLATE (OR EQUAL) ON BOTH SIDES OF THE FIRE-RATED ENCLOSURE TO ENSURE A FULL FIRE-RATING IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODE. T ANY DOOR CLOSER SHALL BE MOUNTED ON THE TENANT SIDE OF ENTRY DOORS. 1 A303 1 A300 1 A301 1 A302 1 A 2 B C D 3 4 6 7 8 1 A401 34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"46' - 6"32' - 0"46' - 6"2170 SF FITNESS 108 1120 SF BIKE ROOM 110 1134 SF LOADING / STAGING 111 307 SF MEN'S LOCKER 105B 307 SF WOMEN'S LOCKER 104B 255 SF MEN'S RESTROOM 105A 255 SF WOMEN'S RESTROOM 104A 711 SF MECH. / BUILDING SERVICES 113 4774 SF OFFICE 115 298 SF UTILITIES 116 3183 SF RETAIL 117 BUILDING DIRECTORY PLAZA ENTRY PARK ENTRY 2374 SF OFFICE 118 4692 SF OFFICE 114 630 SF TRASH / RECYCLING 112 5 3' - 0"22' - 0"9' - 0" 1 A450 3 A450 1 A400 2 A450 30' - 0"1' - 0"1' - 0" 7' - 0"1' - 0"1' - 3 3/4" 1' - 7 1/4" 4' - 2 1/4"8' - 0"11' - 2 1/2"8' - 0"10' - 4"STAIR 1 101 200 SF FIRE COMMAND 106 101102A108110B109B 110C112A112B111B 111A 113110AB6 2 A3 A3 A3 A3A3 G 8 A3 A3 B6 2 A 4 1 A3 1' - 3 1/2"30' - 8 1/2"13' - 9 1/4"4' - 8 1/2" 1' - 0" 9' - 4 3/4"56' - 2 3/4"4' - 8 1/2"34' - 0"1' - 0" 10' - 2 1/2"12' - 0"10' - 4 3/4" 4 3/4"16' - 8 3/16"40' - 10 3/4"10 7/8"34' - 0"9' - 10 5/8" 10 7/8"26' - 9 5/8"7' - 2 3/8"1' - 2"1' - 2" 6' - 10" 3' - 0" 2' - 2"14' - 8"2' - 2" 8' - 6 7/8" 2' - 2"1' - 2"1' - 0"7' - 0"6' - 11 3/4"10' - 0 5/8"14' - 11 5/8" 6 3/4" 5' - 2" 68' - 0"136' - 0" PC-2 1 1' - 10 1/2"A700 3 A701 3 A703 1 885' - 9" 882' - 5"6' - 0"2' - 11" 2' - 6"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"5' - 0"8' - 6" 1' - 6" 3' - 3"25' - 6"3' - 3" 1' - 6" 8' - 6"5' - 0"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"2' - 6" 2' - 11" 2' - 11" 2' - 6"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"2' - 6" 2' - 3"29' - 6"2' - 3" 2' - 6"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"2' - 6" 2' - 11"2' - 11"2' - 11"2' - 11" 2' - 5 1/2"2' - 11"3775 SF LOBBY 100 A151 1 SEE SHEET A150SEE SHEET A1502' - 0"4' - 9"29' - 6"4' - 9" 1' - 0" 2' - 8 1/2" 4' - 10 1/2" 10 3/4" 4' - 0" 4' - 0" 6' - 6" 2' - 0" 5' - 0" 1539 SF CIRCULATION 103 180 SF SERVICE ELEV 107 173 SF STAIR 2 102100D100F 100C100ABUILDING DIRECTORY 5' - 0 3/16"1' - 0"4' - 0" 5 A450 4 A450 2' - 2"2' - 2"2' - 6" A3A3 A3 102B107106 A3A3 116 115114117A118117B103105A 104A 105C 104C 111C4' - 8 1/2"10' - 4 3/4" 109A 253 SF CIRCULATION 109 10' - 6"16' - 0" 4 3/4" 5' - 7 1/4" 7' - 0 3/4" 2' - 11 1/4"BIKE REPAIR STATIONS55" WEATHER MONITOR BIKE PARTS VENDING MACHINE CAPACITY: 114 BIKES13' - 5"10' - 8 1/2"9' - 10 1/2"ALIGNALIGNALIGNALIGN13' - 0 7/16"B6 2 B6 2 B6 2 C2 TYP. PFB 2 A3A3 A3 C2 A 4 1 A 4 1 A3A3 E6 2 E6 2 A3 2"7 5/8" CATWALK EDGES ABOVE SECURITY DESK3' - 0"9' - 9 5/16" ALIGN ALIGN ALIGN ALIGN 4 3/4" 4' - 11" F11 F4 A6 A3 A6 A3A3 A3A3 F4 5' - 6 7/8"7' - 3 1/4"11' - 6 1/4"14' - 6 7/8"5' - 1 1/4"B6 2 8' - 1 1/2" 4 3/4" B6 2 A3B6 2 B6 2 B6 2 5' - 6 3/4" 5' - 6 7/8"11' - 3 7/8"5' - 6 7/8" A3 1' - 0 1/8"10 7/8"15' - 0"3' - 4"2' - 4 3/4"E6 2 E6 2 C2 C2 A6.1 1 A6 E6 2 E6 2 C2 C2 E6 2 E6 2 B6 2 FSG 4 B6 2 E 3 2 E4 2 B6 2 A 4 1 A3 C2 G 8G 8 PC-1A 1 PLAN KEYNOTES 1 6" CONCRETE FILLED EXTERIOR BOLLARD - SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS 2 HOSE BIB 3 CONCRETE STOOP WITH FROST FOOTING - SEE STRUCT. 4 SPRINKLER RISER 5 GAS METER 6 FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION 7 ELECTRICAL PANELS - SEE ELEC. PLANS 8 NOT USED 9 NOT USED 10 ACCESS PANEL - SEE MECH. R RYAN A+E, INC. 50 South Tenth Street, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55403-2012 612-492-4000 tel 612-492-3000 fax PROJECT NAME LOCATION SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY JOB NO.DATE SHEET NO. WWW.RYANCOMPANIES.COM © 2014 RYAN A+E, INC.PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 7.8.2016 SD SET 7/8/2016 1:38:19 PM Author Checker 700270 7.8.2016 A100 10 WEST END FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 1 1601 Utica Avenue South St Louis Park, MN 55416 N 1/8" = 1'-0"A100 1 LEVEL 1 ISSUE RECORD ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8e) Title: 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page 30 DN DNUP UP GENERAL NOTES A REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR SLAB ON GRADE CONSTRUCTION, CONTROL AND ISOLATION JOINTS. B COORDINATE UNDERGROUND AND UNDER SLAB UTILITIES WITH RELEVANT TRADES PRIOR TO SLAB POUR. COORDINATE ALL SLEEVES THROUGH/UNDER FOOTING AND FOUNDATION WITH STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. C PROVIDE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS OF SIZE, TYPE, AND LOCATION AS REQUIRED BY THE FIRE MARSHAL. D DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF MASONRY OR FACE OF GYP. BD. U.N.O. E SEE SHEET A600 FOR WALL TYPE INFORMATION F SEE SHEET A601 FOR PARTITION TYPE INFORMATION G ALL WALLS TO ROOF DECK TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO ACCOMMODATE DEFLECTION OF ROOF STRUCTURE. H REFER TO STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO STRUCTURAL COMPONENT SIZES, LOCATIONS, CONFIGURATIONS, AND CAPACITIES. J ALL THRESHOLDS TO BE 1/2" HIGH MAX. K PROVIDE MOISTURE RESISTANT GYP BD. ON TOILET ROOM WET WALL AND ADJACENT TO JANITOR SINK. L PROVIDE CONTROL JOINTS IN GYP. BD. AS RECOMMENDED BY MANUFACTURER. M STAIR SUPPLIER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CODE COMPLIANCE AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY FOR ALL MATERIALS FURNISHED. N NEW PARTITIONS TO BE NOTED AND DESCRIBED AS W ALL PARTITION TYPES. O SUBCONTRACTOR TO VERIFY DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS. ANY OMISSIONS, DISCREPANCIES, OR CONFLICTS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE DESIGN-BUILDER IMMEDIATELY. P DIMENSIONS ARE 4'-0" ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR AND FROM FACE OF FINISHED PARTITION. Q DRAWINGS SHOULD NOT BE SCALED - DIMENSIONS GOVERN. LARGE SCALE DRAWINGS GOVERN OVER SMALL SCALE DRAWINGS. R THE TYPICAL DIMENSION FROM THE HINGE SIDE OF A DOOR OPENING IS TO THE FACE OF ADJACENT PERPENDICULAR WALL IS 3" U.N.O. S W HEREVER A PENETRATION OCCURS IN A FIRE-RATED ENCLOSURE SUCH AS WALLS OR SLABS, THE SPACE AROUND THE PENETRATION SHALL NOT EXCEED 1/2", SHALL BE PACKED WITH SOLID MINERAL WOOL (OR EQUAL), AND SHALL BE CLOSED OFF WITH A TIGHT FITTING ESCUTCHEON PLATE (OR EQUAL) ON BOTH SIDES OF THE FIRE-RATED ENCLOSURE TO ENSURE A FULL FIRE-RATING IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODE. T ANY DOOR CLOSER SHALL BE MOUNTED ON THE TENANT SIDE OF ENTRY DOORS. U PROVIDE ROD AND SHELF AT COAT CLOSETS. 1 A303 1 A300 1 A301 1 A302 1 A 2 B C D 3 4 6 7 8 1 A401 34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"68' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"46' - 6"32' - 0"46' - 6"4130 SF OFFICE 210 1890 SF LARGE CONFERENCE 211 5360 SF OFFICE 214 8320 SF OFFICE 209 360 SF WOMEN'S RESTROOM 177 340 SF MEN'S RESTROOM 205 630 SF MEDIUM CONFERENCE 213 720 SF PRE-FUNCTION SPACE 212 5 1 A400 180 SF SERVICE ELEV 207 GRAND STAIR 200 STAIR 1 201 BOH 208 3330 SF CIRCULATION 203 STAIR 2 202 382345357358318 227 16414' - 9"14' - 11 7/16"15' - 10 3/16"34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"46' - 6"32' - 0"46' - 6"68' - 0"136' - 0"45' - 0"1' - 6"44' - 0"2' - 6"A3A3 A3 A3A3 A3 A3 A3 F11 B6 2 6 A3 A3 38' - 6"8' - 0" 9 5/8" 26' - 7 1/4"4' - 7 1/8" 7' - 0 1/16"39' - 5 15/16"7' - 6 1/8"8' - 3 3/8"8' - 7 1/16"25' - 4 15/16" 8' - 7 1/4"10' - 7 1/4"9' - 0"10' - 2 1/4"8' - 8 1/2"15' - 1 1/4"10' - 9 5/8"7' - 0" 18' - 5 7/8"15' - 6 1/8"10' - 4 3/4"30' - 5 3/8"9 5/8"19' - 8"12' - 4"12' - 0"8' - 0"11' - 7 1/4"4 3/4"4 3/4"5' - 2"9' - 5"22' - 7"5' - 8 1/2"8' - 0" 8 1/2"5 1/2" 1' - 3 3/4" 10 7/8"34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"1' - 0" 1' - 3 3/4"34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"33' - 10 3/8"5' - 7 9/16"A700 4 A701 4 A703 2 OPEN TO BELOW OPEN TO BELOW SEE SHEET A150SEE SHEET A150A151 2 A304 1 5' - 1 1/4" 8' - 5 3/4"5' - 0"7' - 4 13/16"6' - 0"7' - 0"8' - 4 3/4"11' - 0"20' - 4"5' - 2" 5' - 2" 3' - 1" 3' - 0" 3' - 0" 3' - 0" 3' - 1" 40 SF BOH 206 PLAN KEYNOTES 1 6" CONCRETE FILLED EXTERIOR BOLLARD - SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS 2 HOSE BIB 3 CONCRETE STOOP WITH FROST FOOTING - SEE STRUCT. 4 SPRINKLER RISER 5 GAS METER 6 FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION 7 ELECTRICAL PANELS - SEE ELEC. PLANS 8 NOT USED 9 NOT USED 10 ACCESS PANEL - SEE MECH. R RYAN A+E, INC. 50 South Tenth Street, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55403-2012 612-492-4000 tel 612-492-3000 fax PROJECT NAME LOCATION SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY JOB NO.DATE SHEET NO. WWW.RYANCOMPANIES.COM © 2014 RYAN A+E, INC.PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 6.20.2016 CITY SUBMITTAL 6/17/2016 3:10:25 PM Author Checker 700270 6.20.2016 A101 10 WEST END FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 2 St. Louis Park & Golden Valley, MN N 1/8" = 1'-0"A101 1 LEVEL 2 ISSUE RECORD ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8e) Title: 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page 31 UP DNUP GENERAL NOTES A REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR SLAB ON GRADE CONSTRUCTION, CONTROL AND ISOLATION JOINTS. B COORDINATE UNDERGROUND AND UNDER SLAB UTILITIES WITH RELEVANT TRADES PRIOR TO SLAB POUR. COORDINATE ALL SLEEVES THROUGH/UNDER FOOTING AND FOUNDATION WITH STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. C PROVIDE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS OF SIZE, TYPE, AND LOCATION AS REQUIRED BY THE FIRE MARSHAL. D DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF MASONRY OR FACE OF GYP. BD. U.N.O. E SEE SHEET A600 FOR WALL TYPE INFORMATION F SEE SHEET A601 FOR PARTITION TYPE INFORMATION G ALL WALLS TO ROOF DECK TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO ACCOMMODATE DEFLECTION OF ROOF STRUCTURE. H REFER TO STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO STRUCTURAL COMPONENT SIZES, LOCATIONS, CONFIGURATIONS, AND CAPACITIES. J ALL THRESHOLDS TO BE 1/2" HIGH MAX. K PROVIDE MOISTURE RESISTANT GYP BD. ON TOILET ROOM WET WALL AND ADJACENT TO JANITOR SINK. L PROVIDE CONTROL JOINTS IN GYP. BD. AS RECOMMENDED BY MANUFACTURER. M STAIR SUPPLIER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CODE COMPLIANCE AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY FOR ALL MATERIALS FURNISHED. N NEW PARTITIONS TO BE NOTED AND DESCRIBED AS W ALL PARTITION TYPES. O SUBCONTRACTOR TO VERIFY DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS. ANY OMISSIONS, DISCREPANCIES, OR CONFLICTS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE DESIGN-BUILDER IMMEDIATELY. P DIMENSIONS ARE 4'-0" ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR AND FROM FACE OF FINISHED PARTITION. Q DRAWINGS SHOULD NOT BE SCALED - DIMENSIONS GOVERN. LARGE SCALE DRAWINGS GOVERN OVER SMALL SCALE DRAWINGS. R THE TYPICAL DIMENSION FROM THE HINGE SIDE OF A DOOR OPENING IS TO THE FACE OF ADJACENT PERPENDICULAR WALL IS 3" U.N.O. S W HEREVER A PENETRATION OCCURS IN A FIRE-RATED ENCLOSURE SUCH AS WALLS OR SLABS, THE SPACE AROUND THE PENETRATION SHALL NOT EXCEED 1/2", SHALL BE PACKED WITH SOLID MINERAL WOOL (OR EQUAL), AND SHALL BE CLOSED OFF WITH A TIGHT FITTING ESCUTCHEON PLATE (OR EQUAL) ON BOTH SIDES OF THE FIRE-RATED ENCLOSURE TO ENSURE A FULL FIRE-RATING IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODE. T ANY DOOR CLOSER SHALL BE MOUNTED ON THE TENANT SIDE OF ENTRY DOORS. U PROVIDE ROD AND SHELF AT COAT CLOSETS. 1 A303 1 A300 1 A301 1 A302 1 A 2 B C D 3 4 6 7 8 1 A401 5 1 A400 CIRCULATION 303 250 SF MENS 305 260 SF WOMENS 304 Room 306 STAIR 1 301 SERVICE ELEV 307 90 SF Room 308 50 SF Room 309 STAIR 2 302 34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"46' - 6"32' - 0"46' - 6"7330 SF OFFICE 310 4780 SF OFFICE 312 12580 SF OFFICE 311 386 308303383312311317 305 302307322385304310 38470' - 3"29' - 6"140' - 0" 2' - 6"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"2' - 6" 2' - 3"29' - 6"2' - 3" 2' - 6"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"2' - 6" 1' - 9"77' - 6"52' - 0"2' - 3"2' - 6"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"13' - 6"1' - 6"3' - 3"25' - 6"3' - 3"46' - 6"2' - 3"52' - 0"25' - 6"12' - 0"60' - 9"2 1 2 1 2 1 40' - 1 1/8"6' - 4 7/8"32' - 0"6' - 0 1/16"40' - 5 15/16"4 3/4"30' - 6"1' - 1 1/4"6' - 9 5/8"26' - 4 7/8"7' - 7 1/8"1' - 0" 6' - 4 7/8"20' - 4"12' - 0 5/8"19' - 2 1/2"9' - 0"18' - 10 3/4"9' - 1 1/4"6' - 0"4 3/4"14' - 4 1/4"2' - 1 3/4"15' - 1 1/4"22' - 7"2' - 8 3/4"6' - 8 1/4"26' - 0"8' - 0" A3A3 A3A3 A3 A3 E6 2 B6 2 C2 A3A3 A3A3 E6 2 E6 2 E6 2 E6 2 E6 2 E6 2 E6 2 E6 2 E6 2 E6 2 E6 2 B6 2 A3 B6 2 B6 2 B6 2 B6 2 B6 2A700 5 A701 5 A703 3 6' - 4 3/4"6' - 0"6' - 0" 5' - 0" 8' - 0"5' - 0"5' - 0"6' - 0"5' - 0"6' - 0" PLAN KEYNOTES 1 6" CONCRETE FILLED EXTERIOR BOLLARD - SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS 2 HOSE BIB 3 CONCRETE STOOP WITH FROST FOOTING - SEE STRUCT. 4 SPRINKLER RISER 5 GAS METER 6 FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION 7 ELECTRICAL PANELS - SEE ELEC. PLANS 8 NOT USED 9 NOT USED 10 ACCESS PANEL - SEE MECH. R RYAN A+E, INC. 50 South Tenth Street, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55403-2012 612-492-4000 tel 612-492-3000 fax PROJECT NAME LOCATION SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY JOB NO.DATE SHEET NO. WWW.RYANCOMPANIES.COM © 2014 RYAN A+E, INC.PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 6.20.2016 CITY SUBMITTAL 6/17/2016 3:10:28 PM Author Checker 700270 6.20.2016 A102 10 WEST END FLOOR PLAN - LEVELS 3 & 4 (TYP. MULTI) St. Louis Park & Golden Valley, MN N 1/8" = 1'-0"A102 1 LEVELS 3 & 4 - MULTI-TENANT FLOOR ISSUE RECORD ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8e) Title: 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page 32 DNUP GENERAL NOTES A REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR SLAB ON GRADE CONSTRUCTION, CONTROL AND ISOLATION JOINTS. B COORDINATE UNDERGROUND AND UNDER SLAB UTILITIES WITH RELEVANT TRADES PRIOR TO SLAB POUR. COORDINATE ALL SLEEVES THROUGH/UNDER FOOTING AND FOUNDATION WITH STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. C PROVIDE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS OF SIZE, TYPE, AND LOCATION AS REQUIRED BY THE FIRE MARSHAL. D DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF MASONRY OR FACE OF GYP. BD. U.N.O. E SEE SHEET A600 FOR WALL TYPE INFORMATION F SEE SHEET A601 FOR PARTITION TYPE INFORMATION G ALL WALLS TO ROOF DECK TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO ACCOMMODATE DEFLECTION OF ROOF STRUCTURE. H REFER TO STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO STRUCTURAL COMPONENT SIZES, LOCATIONS, CONFIGURATIONS, AND CAPACITIES. J ALL THRESHOLDS TO BE 1/2" HIGH MAX. K PROVIDE MOISTURE RESISTANT GYP BD. ON TOILET ROOM WET WALL AND ADJACENT TO JANITOR SINK. L PROVIDE CONTROL JOINTS IN GYP. BD. AS RECOMMENDED BY MANUFACTURER. M STAIR SUPPLIER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CODE COMPLIANCE AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY FOR ALL MATERIALS FURNISHED. N NEW PARTITIONS TO BE NOTED AND DESCRIBED AS W ALL PARTITION TYPES. O SUBCONTRACTOR TO VERIFY DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS. ANY OMISSIONS, DISCREPANCIES, OR CONFLICTS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE DESIGN-BUILDER IMMEDIATELY. P DIMENSIONS ARE 4'-0" ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR AND FROM FACE OF FINISHED PARTITION. Q DRAWINGS SHOULD NOT BE SCALED - DIMENSIONS GOVERN. LARGE SCALE DRAWINGS GOVERN OVER SMALL SCALE DRAWINGS. R THE TYPICAL DIMENSION FROM THE HINGE SIDE OF A DOOR OPENING IS TO THE FACE OF ADJACENT PERPENDICULAR WALL IS 3" U.N.O. S W HEREVER A PENETRATION OCCURS IN A FIRE-RATED ENCLOSURE SUCH AS WALLS OR SLABS, THE SPACE AROUND THE PENETRATION SHALL NOT EXCEED 1/2", SHALL BE PACKED WITH SOLID MINERAL WOOL (OR EQUAL), AND SHALL BE CLOSED OFF WITH A TIGHT FITTING ESCUTCHEON PLATE (OR EQUAL) ON BOTH SIDES OF THE FIRE-RATED ENCLOSURE TO ENSURE A FULL FIRE-RATING IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODE. T ANY DOOR CLOSER SHALL BE MOUNTED ON THE TENANT SIDE OF ENTRY DOORS. U PROVIDE ROD AND SHELF AT COAT CLOSETS. 1 A303 1 A300 1 A301 1 A302 1 A 2 B C D 3 4 6 7 8 1 A401 34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"68' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"46' - 6"32' - 0"46' - 6"5 1 A400 180 SF SERVICE ELEV 707 170 SF STAIR 1 701 286168 29' - 6"140' - 6" 12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"4' - 9"29' - 6"4' - 9"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"5' - 0"12' - 0"4' - 3"52' - 0"25' - 6"52' - 0"33' - 9"18' - 3"25' - 6"52' - 0"52' - 0"25' - 6"4' - 9"12' - 0"17' - 0"4' - 6"13' - 9"25' - 6"4' - 9"8' - 8 1/8"4' - 9 7/8"17' - 4 7/8"11' - 7 1/8"32' - 0"46' - 6"32' - 0"19' - 2 1/2"9' - 0"10' - 2 1/4"8' - 8 1/2"15' - 1 1/4"32' - 0"25' - 3 3/4"6' - 8 1/4"2 1 2 1 2 1 B6 2 A4A4 E6 2 E6 2 E6 2 E6 2 E6 2 E6 2 E6 2 A4A4 E6 2 E6 2 B6 2 A703 3 Sim A700 5 Sim A701 5 Sim A151 3 260 SF WOMENS 704 250 SF MENS 705 170 SF BOH 710 170 SF STAIR 2 702 OFFICE 700 100 SF BOH 706 90 SF BOH 708 50 SF BOH 709 PLAN KEYNOTES 1 6" CONCRETE FILLED EXTERIOR BOLLARD - SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS 2 HOSE BIB 3 CONCRETE STOOP WITH FROST FOOTING - SEE STRUCT. 4 SPRINKLER RISER 5 GAS METER 6 FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION 7 ELECTRICAL PANELS - SEE ELEC. PLANS 8 NOT USED 9 NOT USED 10 ACCESS PANEL - SEE MECH. R RYAN A+E, INC. 50 South Tenth Street, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55403-2012 612-492-4000 tel 612-492-3000 fax PROJECT NAME LOCATION SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY JOB NO.DATE SHEET NO. WWW.RYANCOMPANIES.COM © 2014 RYAN A+E, INC.PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 6.20.2016 CITY SUBMITTAL 6/17/2016 3:10:31 PM Author Checker 700270 6.20.2016 A103 10 WEST END FLOOR PLAN - LEVELS 5-10 (TYP. SINGLE) St. Louis Park & Golden Valley, MN N 1/8" = 1'-0"A103 1 LEVELS 5-10 - SINGLE TENANT FLOOR ISSUE RECORD ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8e) Title: 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page 33 DN GENERAL NOTES A REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR SLAB ON GRADE CONSTRUCTION, CONTROL AND ISOLATION JOINTS. B COORDINATE UNDERGROUND AND UNDER SLAB UTILITIES WITH RELEVANT TRADES PRIOR TO SLAB POUR. COORDINATE ALL SLEEVES THROUGH/UNDER FOOTING AND FOUNDATION WITH STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. C PROVIDE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS OF SIZE, TYPE, AND LOCATION AS REQUIRED BY THE FIRE MARSHAL. D DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF MASONRY OR FACE OF GYP. BD. U.N.O. E SEE SHEET A600 FOR WALL TYPE INFORMATION F SEE SHEET A601 FOR PARTITION TYPE INFORMATION G ALL WALLS TO ROOF DECK TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO ACCOMMODATE DEFLECTION OF ROOF STRUCTURE. H REFER TO STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO STRUCTURAL COMPONENT SIZES, LOCATIONS, CONFIGURATIONS, AND CAPACITIES. J ALL THRESHOLDS TO BE 1/2" HIGH MAX. K PROVIDE MOISTURE RESISTANT GYP BD. ON TOILET ROOM WET WALL AND ADJACENT TO JANITOR SINK. L PROVIDE CONTROL JOINTS IN GYP. BD. AS RECOMMENDED BY MANUFACTURER. M STAIR SUPPLIER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CODE COMPLIANCE AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY FOR ALL MATERIALS FURNISHED. N NEW PARTITIONS TO BE NOTED AND DESCRIBED AS W ALL PARTITION TYPES. O SUBCONTRACTOR TO VERIFY DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS. ANY OMISSIONS, DISCREPANCIES, OR CONFLICTS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE DESIGN-BUILDER IMMEDIATELY. P DIMENSIONS ARE 4'-0" ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR AND FROM FACE OF FINISHED PARTITION. Q DRAWINGS SHOULD NOT BE SCALED - DIMENSIONS GOVERN. LARGE SCALE DRAWINGS GOVERN OVER SMALL SCALE DRAWINGS. R THE TYPICAL DIMENSION FROM THE HINGE SIDE OF A DOOR OPENING IS TO THE FACE OF ADJACENT PERPENDICULAR WALL IS 3" U.N.O. S W HEREVER A PENETRATION OCCURS IN A FIRE-RATED ENCLOSURE SUCH AS WALLS OR SLABS, THE SPACE AROUND THE PENETRATION SHALL NOT EXCEED 1/2", SHALL BE PACKED WITH SOLID MINERAL WOOL (OR EQUAL), AND SHALL BE CLOSED OFF WITH A TIGHT FITTING ESCUTCHEON PLATE (OR EQUAL) ON BOTH SIDES OF THE FIRE-RATED ENCLOSURE TO ENSURE A FULL FIRE-RATING IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODE. T ANY DOOR CLOSER SHALL BE MOUNTED ON THE TENANT SIDE OF ENTRY DOORS. U PROVIDE ROD AND SHELF AT COAT CLOSETS. 1 A303 1 A300 1 A301 1 A302 1 A 2 B C D 3 4 6 7 8 1 A401 5 34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"46' - 6"32' - 0"46' - 6"1 A400 170 SF STAIR 1 1101 170 SF STAIR 2 1102354 2773' - 0"99' - 0"3' - 0"31' - 0"3' - 0"31' - 0"3' - 0"16' - 5 1/4"3' - 0"43' - 9"1' - 3"2' - 6"27' - 0"2' - 6"1' - 3"43' - 9"1' - 6"1' - 6"3' - 0"17' - 6"87' - 0"17' - 6"3' - 0"46' - 6"32' - 0"46' - 6"32' - 0"39' - 9 1/2"29' - 2 1/2"17' - 10 3/4"15' - 1 1/4"32' - 0"B6 2 A700 6 A701 6 A703 4 A151 3 Sim A3043 A051 2 100 SF BOH 1106 260 SF WOMENS 1104 250 SF MENS 1105 23560 SF OFFICE 1100 170 SF SERVICE ELEV 1107 170 SF BOH 1110 50 SF BOH 1109 90 SF BOH 1108 PLAN KEYNOTES 1 6" CONCRETE FILLED EXTERIOR BOLLARD - SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS 2 HOSE BIB 3 CONCRETE STOOP WITH FROST FOOTING - SEE STRUCT. 4 SPRINKLER RISER 5 GAS METER 6 FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION 7 ELECTRICAL PANELS - SEE ELEC. PLANS 8 NOT USED 9 NOT USED 10 ACCESS PANEL - SEE MECH. R RYAN A+E, INC. 50 South Tenth Street, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55403-2012 612-492-4000 tel 612-492-3000 fax PROJECT NAME LOCATION SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY JOB NO.DATE SHEET NO. WWW.RYANCOMPANIES.COM © 2014 RYAN A+E, INC.PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 6.20.2016 CITY SUBMITTAL 6/17/2016 3:10:34 PM Author Checker 700270 6.20.2016 A104 10 WEST END FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 11 St. Louis Park & Golden Valley, MN N 1/8" = 1'-0"A104 1 LEVEL 11 ISSUE RECORD ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8e) Title: 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page 34 GENERAL NOTES A REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR SLAB ON GRADE CONSTRUCTION, CONTROL AND ISOLATION JOINTS. B COORDINATE UNDERGROUND AND UNDER SLAB UTILITIES WITH RELEVANT TRADES PRIOR TO SLAB POUR. COORDINATE ALL SLEEVES THROUGH/UNDER FOOTING AND FOUNDATION WITH STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. C PROVIDE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS OF SIZE, TYPE, AND LOCATION AS REQUIRED BY THE FIRE MARSHAL. D DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF MASONRY OR FACE OF GYP. BD. U.N.O. E SEE SHEET A600 FOR WALL TYPE INFORMATION F SEE SHEET A601 FOR PARTITION TYPE INFORMATION G ALL WALLS TO ROOF DECK TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO ACCOMMODATE DEFLECTION OF ROOF STRUCTURE. H REFER TO STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO STRUCTURAL COMPONENT SIZES, LOCATIONS, CONFIGURATIONS, AND CAPACITIES. J ALL THRESHOLDS TO BE 1/2" HIGH MAX. K PROVIDE MOISTURE RESISTANT GYP BD. ON TOILET ROOM WET WALL AND ADJACENT TO JANITOR SINK. L PROVIDE CONTROL JOINTS IN GYP. BD. AS RECOMMENDED BY MANUFACTURER. M STAIR SUPPLIER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CODE COMPLIANCE AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY FOR ALL MATERIALS FURNISHED. N NEW PARTITIONS TO BE NOTED AND DESCRIBED AS W ALL PARTITION TYPES. O SUBCONTRACTOR TO VERIFY DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS. ANY OMISSIONS, DISCREPANCIES, OR CONFLICTS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE DESIGN-BUILDER IMMEDIATELY. P DIMENSIONS ARE 4'-0" ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR AND FROM FACE OF FINISHED PARTITION. Q DRAWINGS SHOULD NOT BE SCALED - DIMENSIONS GOVERN. LARGE SCALE DRAWINGS GOVERN OVER SMALL SCALE DRAWINGS. R THE TYPICAL DIMENSION FROM THE HINGE SIDE OF A DOOR OPENING IS TO THE FACE OF ADJACENT PERPENDICULAR WALL IS 3" U.N.O. S W HEREVER A PENETRATION OCCURS IN A FIRE-RATED ENCLOSURE SUCH AS WALLS OR SLABS, THE SPACE AROUND THE PENETRATION SHALL NOT EXCEED 1/2", SHALL BE PACKED WITH SOLID MINERAL WOOL (OR EQUAL), AND SHALL BE CLOSED OFF WITH A TIGHT FITTING ESCUTCHEON PLATE (OR EQUAL) ON BOTH SIDES OF THE FIRE-RATED ENCLOSURE TO ENSURE A FULL FIRE-RATING IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODE. T ANY DOOR CLOSER SHALL BE MOUNTED ON THE TENANT SIDE OF ENTRY DOORS. U PROVIDE ROD AND SHELF AT COAT CLOSETS. 1 A 2 B C D 3 4 6 7 85 6' - 0"46' - 6"32' - 0"46' - 6"6' - 0"6' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"6' - 0" 1 A400 1080 SF BOILER 1200 170 SF STAIR 2 1202 143 A701 7 A3043 A051 2 PLAN KEYNOTES 1 6" CONCRETE FILLED EXTERIOR BOLLARD - SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS 2 HOSE BIB 3 CONCRETE STOOP WITH FROST FOOTING - SEE STRUCT. 4 SPRINKLER RISER 5 GAS METER 6 FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION 7 ELECTRICAL PANELS - SEE ELEC. PLANS 8 NOT USED 9 NOT USED 10 ACCESS PANEL - SEE MECH. R RYAN A+E, INC. 50 South Tenth Street, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55403-2012 612-492-4000 tel 612-492-3000 fax PROJECT NAME LOCATION SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY JOB NO.DATE SHEET NO. WWW.RYANCOMPANIES.COM © 2014 RYAN A+E, INC.PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 6.20.2016 CITY SUBMITTAL 6/17/2016 3:10:36 PM Author Checker 700270 6.20.2016 A105 10 WEST END FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 12 (PENTHOUSE) St. Louis Park & Golden Valley, MN N 1/8" = 1'-0"A105 1 LEVEL 12 - PENTHOUSE ISSUE RECORD ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8e) Title: 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page 35 R R R RRR R DN DN 1 A303 1 A300 1 A301 1 A302 1 A 2 B C D 3 4 6 7 8 1 A401 5 1 A400 1 A701 2 A701 2 A700 1 A700 1 A702 2 A702 A3043 A304 1 A051 2 R RYAN A+E, INC. 50 South Tenth Street, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55403-2012 612-492-4000 tel 612-492-3000 fax PROJECT NAME LOCATION SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY JOB NO.DATE SHEET NO. WWW.RYANCOMPANIES.COM © 2014 RYAN A+E, INC.PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 6.20.2016 CITY SUBMITTAL 6/17/2016 3:10:42 PM Author Checker 700270 6.20.2016 A120 10 WEST END ROOF PLAN St. Louis Park & Golden Valley, MN 1/8" = 1'-0"A120 1 ROOF N ISSUE RECORD ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8e) Title: 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page 36 DN 1 A303 A B C D 8 1 A400 21' - 0 1/2" 23' - 10 1/2"13' - 10 3/8"310 SF GENERATOR 541 FULL LOUVERED W ALL 3' - 0" 20' - 0" 10' - 3"15' - 0"11' - 6" A304 2 A B C D 8 2 X201 1 A400 46' - 6"32' - 0"46' - 6"78' - 6"AA BB CC DD 8 8 A304 2 GENERAL NOTES A REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR SLAB ON GRADE CONSTRUCTION, CONTROL AND ISOLATION JOINTS. B COORDINATE UNDERGROUND AND UNDER SLAB UTILITIES WITH RELEVANT TRADES PRIOR TO SLAB POUR. COORDINATE ALL SLEEVES THROUGH/UNDER FOOTING AND FOUNDATION WITH STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. C PROVIDE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS OF SIZE, TYPE, AND LOCATION AS REQUIRED BY THE FIRE MARSHAL. D DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF MASONRY OR FACE OF GYP. BD. U.N.O. E SEE SHEET A600 FOR WALL TYPE INFORMATION F SEE SHEET A601 FOR PARTITION TYPE INFORMATION G ALL WALLS TO ROOF DECK TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO ACCOMMODATE DEFLECTION OF ROOF STRUCTURE. H REFER TO STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO STRUCTURAL COMPONENT SIZES, LOCATIONS, CONFIGURATIONS, AND CAPACITIES. J ALL THRESHOLDS TO BE 1/2" HIGH MAX. K PROVIDE MOISTURE RESISTANT GYP BD. ON TOILET ROOM WET WALL AND ADJACENT TO JANITOR SINK. L PROVIDE CONTROL JOINTS IN GYP. BD. AS RECOMMENDED BY MANUFACTURER. M STAIR SUPPLIER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CODE COMPLIANCE AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY FOR ALL MATERIALS FURNISHED. N NEW PARTITIONS TO BE NOTED AND DESCRIBED AS W ALL PARTITION TYPES. O SUBCONTRACTOR TO VERIFY DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS. ANY OMISSIONS, DISCREPANCIES, OR CONFLICTS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE DESIGN-BUILDER IMMEDIATELY. P DIMENSIONS ARE 4'-0" ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR AND FROM FACE OF FINISHED PARTITION. Q DRAWINGS SHOULD NOT BE SCALED - DIMENSIONS GOVERN. LARGE SCALE DRAWINGS GOVERN OVER SMALL SCALE DRAWINGS. R THE TYPICAL DIMENSION FROM THE HINGE SIDE OF A DOOR OPENING IS TO THE FACE OF ADJACENT PERPENDICULAR WALL IS 3" U.N.O. S W HEREVER A PENETRATION OCCURS IN A FIRE-RATED ENCLOSURE SUCH AS WALLS OR SLABS, THE SPACE AROUND THE PENETRATION SHALL NOT EXCEED 1/2", SHALL BE PACKED WITH SOLID MINERAL WOOL (OR EQUAL), AND SHALL BE CLOSED OFF WITH A TIGHT FITTING ESCUTCHEON PLATE (OR EQUAL) ON BOTH SIDES OF THE FIRE-RATED ENCLOSURE TO ENSURE A FULL FIRE-RATING IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODE. T ANY DOOR CLOSER SHALL BE MOUNTED ON THE TENANT SIDE OF ENTRY DOORS. U PROVIDE ROD AND SHELF AT COAT CLOSETS. R RYAN A+E, INC. 50 South Tenth Street, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55403-2012 612-492-4000 tel 612-492-3000 fax PROJECT NAME LOCATION SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY JOB NO.DATE SHEET NO. WWW.RYANCOMPANIES.COM © 2014 RYAN A+E, INC.PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 6.20.2016 CITY SUBMITTAL 6/17/2016 3:10:46 PM Author Checker 700270 6.20.2016 A150 10 WEST END FLOOR PLAN - LOADING DOCK St. Louis Park & Golden Valley, MN 1/8" = 1'-0"A150 1 LOADING DOCK - LEVEL 1 PLAN 1/8" = 1'-0"A150 2 LOADING DOCK - SKYWAY PLAN N ISSUE RECORD ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8e) Title: 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page 37 LEVEL 1 885' - 9" LEVEL 2 900' - 9" 1 LEVEL 3 915' - 9" LEVEL 4 929' - 9" LEVEL 5 943' - 9" LEVEL 6 957' - 9" LEVEL 7 971' - 9" LEVEL 8 985' - 9" LEVEL 9 999' - 9" LEVEL 10 1013' - 9" LEVEL 11 1027' - 9" MECH PENTHOUSE 1043' - 9" 2 3 4 6 7 8 1 A401 5 APC-1S MP-5 GL-21T MP-5 MP-5 MP-5 MP-5MP-5 MP-5 APC-1S GL-21 GL-21 MP-5 MP-5 FB-1 MP-5 FB-1 LOADING DOCK 882' - 5" W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 W2 W1W3 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W21 W21 W21 W21 W21 W21 W21 W21 W22W23W23 W23 W23 W23 W25 MP-5 MP-5 GL-21T W OOD SOFFIT W OOD SOFFIT EXTERIOR MATERIALS % GLASS 50.00%= BRICK 30.75%= PREFINISHED METAL 13.11%= ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST 5.39%= STONE 0.75%= R RYAN A+E, INC. 50 South Tenth Street, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55403-2012 612-492-4000 tel 612-492-3000 fax PROJECT NAME LOCATION SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY JOB NO.DATE SHEET NO. WWW.RYANCOMPANIES.COM © 2014 RYAN A+E, INC.PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 7.8.2016 SD SET 7/8/2016 1:38:52 PM Author Checker 700270 7.8.2016 A300 10 WEST END EXTERIOR ELEVATION - SOUTH 1601 Utica Avenue South St Louis Park, MN 55416 1/8" = 1'-0"A300 1 SOUTH ELEVATION ISSUE RECORD ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8e) Title: 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page 38 LEVEL 1 885' - 9" LEVEL 2 900' - 9" A LEVEL 3 915' - 9" LEVEL 4 929' - 9" LEVEL 5 943' - 9" LEVEL 6 957' - 9" LEVEL 7 971' - 9" LEVEL 8 985' - 9" LEVEL 9 999' - 9" LEVEL 10 1013' - 9" LEVEL 11 1027' - 9" MECH PENTHOUSE 1043' - 9" BCD 1 A400 LOADING DOCK 882' - 5" W1 W1 W4 W5A W4 W1 W1 W15 W16 W16 W16 W20 W18 W18 W18 W18 W18 W18 W18 W18 W18 W18 W18 W18 W18 W18 W18 W18 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W29 W28W28 W15 W15 W15 W5B FB-1 MP-5MP-5 MP-5 MP-5 APC-1S MP-5MP-5 FB-1 STN-12 W OOD SOFFIT W OOD SOFFIT W OOD SOFFIT W OOD SOFFIT GL-21 GL-42 GL-21 EXTERIOR MATERIALS % GLASS 50.00%= BRICK 30.75%= PREFINISHED METAL 13.11%= ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST 5.39%= STONE 0.75%= R RYAN A+E, INC. 50 South Tenth Street, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55403-2012 612-492-4000 tel 612-492-3000 fax PROJECT NAME LOCATION SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY JOB NO.DATE SHEET NO. WWW.RYANCOMPANIES.COM © 2014 RYAN A+E, INC.PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 7.8.2016 SD SET 7/8/2016 1:38:58 PM Author Checker 700270 7.8.2016 A301 10 WEST END EXTERIOR ELEVATION - WEST 1601 Utica Avenue South St Louis Park, MN 55416 1/8" = 1'-0"A301 1 W EST ELEVATION MATERIAL ID MATERIAL ID DESCRIPTION UNIFORMAT CODE SPEC SECTION ACT-1 ACT-1_Acoustic Ceiling Tile - (24x24, 5/8", tegular edge, 15/16 grid)C3030.231 095123 AIR AIR - Air Space APC-1 APC-1 - Architectural Precast Concrete Wall Panel @ Tower APC-1S APC-1S - Architectural Precast Concrete Wall Panel @ Tower(SPANDREL) CMU-1 CMU-1_CMU - Normal (or medium) weight units C1020.120 042000 CONC-1 CONC-1_Concrete, Core/Foundation Walls 033000 CONC-2 CONC-2_Normal Weight Concrete Slab, Floors 033000 FB-1 FB-1_Face Brick - (3-5/8" wide x 2-5/16" high x 7-5/8" long)1 74213 GL-21 GL-21_Glass, Insulated - Low-E, clear unit 088100 GL-21T GL-21T_Glass, Insulated - Low-E, clear, tempered 088100 GL-42 GL-42_Glass, Spandrel - Tinted, insulated unit with ceramic frit 088100 GYP BD-1 GYP BD-1_Gypsum Board - 5/8" fire-rated type "X" gypsum board C1010.870 092900 GYP BD-21 GYP BD-21_Gypsum Board - 1" shaft liner C1010.480 092900 INSUL-2 INSUL-2_Insulation, Extruded Polystyrene - Wall insulation B2010.860 072100 INSUL-4 INSUL-4_Insulation, Extruded Polystyrene - High density horizontal rigid insulation (40 PSI)B3010.240 072100 INSUL-21 INSUL-21_Insulation, Fiberglass/Mineral Wool - Interior, Foil-faced fiberglass batt insulation with integral vapor barrier C1010.305 072100 LVR-1 LVR-1_Louver - Prefinished aluminum B2011.170 089100 MET STUD-1 MET STUD-1_Metal Stud Framing, Interior - Non-load bearing, 20 ga, size as indicated C1010.880 092216 MP-1 MP-1_Metal Panels - Composite aluminum panel with return (4mm, wet sealed)B2010.730 074243 MP-5 MP-5_Metal Panels - Formed solid metal panels (1/8" thick)B2010.765 074213 MTL DK-1 Metal Deck 053100 PLAM-1 PLAM-1_(manufacturer, series number, name)E2010.120 064100/123530 SC-2 SC-2_Sealed Concrete - Accent Color STL STUD-1 STL STUD-1_Steel Stud Framing, Exterior - Structural steel studs, 16 ga. Galvanized B2011.100 054100 STN-12 STN-12_Stone - (Granite)C3010.355 044200/049010 WIN AFS-1 WIN AFS-2_Aluminum Framing Systems - Exterior storefront - Clear Wall (2 1/2" x 5")B2020.140 084113 WLAM-1 WLAM-1_Wood Laminate - (manufacturer, series number, name)C3020.480 064116 ISSUE RECORD ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8e) Title: 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page 39 LEVEL 1 885' - 9" LEVEL 2 900' - 9" 1 LEVEL 3 915' - 9" LEVEL 4 929' - 9" LEVEL 5 943' - 9" LEVEL 6 957' - 9" LEVEL 7 971' - 9" LEVEL 8 985' - 9" LEVEL 9 999' - 9" LEVEL 10 1013' - 9" LEVEL 11 1027' - 9" MECH PENTHOUSE 1043' - 9" 234678 1 A401 5 LOADING DOCK 882' - 5" W7 W2 W1 W1 W6 W1 W1 W1 W3 W8 W8 W8 W8 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W17 W21 W21 W21 W21 W21 W21 W21 W21 W22 W23 W23W23W23W23W26 W OOD SOFFIT MP-5 MP-5 FB-1 MP-1 STN-12 GL-21T MP-5 MP-5 GL-21T MP-5MP-5 MP-5 MP-5 APC-1S FB-1 GL-21T FB-1 MP-5 MP-5 GL-21 APC-1S GL-21T MP-5 LVR-1 MP-5 EXTERIOR MATERIALS % GLASS 50.00%= BRICK 30.75%= PREFINISHED METAL 13.11%= ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST 5.39%= STONE 0.75%= R RYAN A+E, INC. 50 South Tenth Street, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55403-2012 612-492-4000 tel 612-492-3000 fax PROJECT NAME LOCATION SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY JOB NO.DATE SHEET NO. WWW.RYANCOMPANIES.COM © 2014 RYAN A+E, INC.PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 7.8.2016 SD SET 7/8/2016 1:39:05 PM Author Checker 700270 7.8.2016 A302 10 WEST END EXTERIOR ELEVATION - NORTH 1601 Utica Avenue South St Louis Park, MN 55416 1/8" = 1'-0"A302 1 NORTH ELEVATION ISSUE RECORD ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8e) Title: 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page 40 LEVEL 1 885' - 9" LEVEL 2 900' - 9" A LEVEL 3 915' - 9" LEVEL 4 929' - 9" LEVEL 5 943' - 9" LEVEL 6 957' - 9" LEVEL 7 971' - 9" LEVEL 8 985' - 9" LEVEL 9 999' - 9" LEVEL 10 1013' - 9" LEVEL 11 1027' - 9" MECH PENTHOUSE 1043' - 9" B C D 1 A400 MP-5 MP-5 GL-21 MP-5MP-5 GL-21 APC-1S MP-5 GL-21 LOADING DOCK 882' - 5" W11 W10 W9 W9 W17 W17 W18 W15 W17 W17 W18 W17W17W18 W17W17W18 W17 W17 W18 W17 W17 W18 W17W17W18 W17W17W18 W17 W17 W18 W17 W17 W18 W17W17W18 W17W17W18 W17 W17 W18 W17 W17 W18 W17W17W18 W17W17W18W19 W24 W27W26 W26 W24 W15 W16 W15 W16 W15 W16 FB-1 STN-12 GL-21 APC-1S MP-5 FB-1 STN-12 APC-1S GL-21 MP-5MP-5 GL-21 MP-5 MP-5 W OOD SOFFIT EXTERIOR MATERIALS % GLASS 50.00%= BRICK 30.75%= PREFINISHED METAL 13.11%= ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST 5.39%= STONE 0.75%= R RYAN A+E, INC. 50 South Tenth Street, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55403-2012 612-492-4000 tel 612-492-3000 fax PROJECT NAME LOCATION SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY JOB NO.DATE SHEET NO. WWW.RYANCOMPANIES.COM © 2014 RYAN A+E, INC.PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 7.8.2016 SD SET 7/8/2016 1:39:10 PM Author Checker 700270 7.8.2016 A303 10 WEST END EXTERIOR ELEVATION - EAST 1601 Utica Avenue South St Louis Park, MN 55416 1/8" = 1'-0"A303 1 EAST ELEVATION MATERIAL ID MATERIAL ID DESCRIPTION UNIFORMAT CODE SPEC SECTION ACT-1 ACT-1_Acoustic Ceiling Tile - (24x24, 5/8", tegular edge, 15/16 grid)C3030.231 095123 AIR AIR - Air Space APC-1 APC-1 - Architectural Precast Concrete Wall Panel @ Tower APC-1S APC-1S - Architectural Precast Concrete Wall Panel @ Tower(SPANDREL) CMU-1 CMU-1_CMU - Normal (or medium) weight units C1020.120 042000 CONC-1 CONC-1_Concrete, Core/Foundation Walls 033000 CONC-2 CONC-2_Normal Weight Concrete Slab, Floors 033000 FB-1 FB-1_Face Brick - (3-5/8" wide x 2-5/16" high x 7-5/8" long)1 74213 GL-21 GL-21_Glass, Insulated - Low-E, clear unit 088100 GL-21T GL-21T_Glass, Insulated - Low-E, clear, tempered 088100 GL-42 GL-42_Glass, Spandrel - Tinted, insulated unit with ceramic frit 088100 GYP BD-1 GYP BD-1_Gypsum Board - 5/8" fire-rated type "X" gypsum board C1010.870 092900 GYP BD-21 GYP BD-21_Gypsum Board - 1" shaft liner C1010.480 092900 INSUL-2 INSUL-2_Insulation, Extruded Polystyrene - Wall insulation B2010.860 072100 INSUL-4 INSUL-4_Insulation, Extruded Polystyrene - High density horizontal rigid insulation (40 PSI)B3010.240 072100 INSUL-21 INSUL-21_Insulation, Fiberglass/Mineral Wool - Interior, Foil-faced fiberglass batt insulation with integral vapor barrier C1010.305 072100 LVR-1 LVR-1_Louver - Prefinished aluminum B2011.170 089100 MET STUD-1 MET STUD-1_Metal Stud Framing, Interior - Non-load bearing, 20 ga, size as indicated C1010.880 092216 MP-1 MP-1_Metal Panels - Composite aluminum panel with return (4mm, wet sealed)B2010.730 074243 MP-5 MP-5_Metal Panels - Formed solid metal panels (1/8" thick)B2010.765 074213 MTL DK-1 Metal Deck 053100 PLAM-1 PLAM-1_(manufacturer, series number, name)E2010.120 064100/123530 SC-2 SC-2_Sealed Concrete - Accent Color STL STUD-1 STL STUD-1_Steel Stud Framing, Exterior - Structural steel studs, 16 ga. Galvanized B2011.100 054100 STN-12 STN-12_Stone - (Granite)C3010.355 044200/049010 WIN AFS-1 WIN AFS-2_Aluminum Framing Systems - Exterior storefront - Clear Wall (2 1/2" x 5")B2020.140 084113 WLAM-1 WLAM-1_Wood Laminate - (manufacturer, series number, name)C3020.480 064116 ISSUE RECORD ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8e) Title: 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page 41 Phone (320) 253-9495 3701 12th Street North, Suite 206 Fax (320) 253-8737 St. Cloud, MN 56303 Toll Free (800) 270-9495 City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8e) Title: 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page 42 R:\Projects\700\200\700-270 West End Office Development\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\FINAL PLAT - West End Office.dwg City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8e) Title: 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final PlatPage 43 kimley-horn.com 2550 University Avenue West, Suite 238N, St. Paul, MN 55114 651-645-4197 MEMORANDUM To: Sean Walther, City of St. Louis Park Nicole Mardell, City of St. Louis Park From: Jessica Laabs, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Date: July 5, 2016 Subject: Ten West Update Purpose of Memo This memo summarizes the results of sanitary sewer, water use, and traffic analyses for development proposals as part of the West End Development at Highway 100/I-394. Phases I and II of the overall development have been implemented, and current proposals include a Phase III hotel development and a Phase IV office tower. In addition, the city has had recent changes in water infrastructure capacity and its guidelines for determining peak water usage. Results of the analyses were compared to the thresholds established in the 2007 Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) and 2013 AUAR Update to evaluate if the proposed development is in conformance with the AUAR and would not incur additional impacts or require additional mitigation measures. Assumptions The pending proposed developments include:  A six-story, limited service hotel with 126 rooms and 68 seats in the hotel bar/breakfast area  An 11-story office building with a total of 335,710 gross square feet (GSF) of space The changes in water capacity infrastructure and guidelines include:  Loss of one water well included in previous AUAR documentation and GAC improvements at other wells, resulting in a reduction in total firm system capacity from 13.32 million gallons per day (MGD) to 12.24 MGD  Shift in city policy to base peak water usage calculations on a five-year average instead of a 10-year average to better reflect actual conditions, resulting in a peak usage of 9.83 MGD instead of 11.88 MGD The analyses were done for two scenarios, called Phase 1 Office and Full Office. The Phase 1 Office Scenario includes the following:  335,710 SF of proposed office space  Proposed 126-room hotel and 68 seat hotel bar/breakfast area  853 planned apartment units City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8e) Title: 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page 44 Page 2 kimley-horn.com 2550 University Avenue West, Suite 238N, St. Paul, MN 55114 651-645-4197  143,316 SF of existing retail  3,566 seats of existing full service restaurant  375 seats of existing casual restaurant  55,288 SF of existing grocery  Existing 2,643 seat movie theater  Demolition of 360 seats of full service restaurant (for the Chili’s and Olive Garden) The Full Office Scenario has one difference from the Phase 1 Office Scenario – it includes 706,706 SF of office based on the Revised Scenario 1A analyzed in October 2014. The other development assumptions remained the same. Sanitary Sewer Analysis Sanitary sewer use is not anticipated to be a limiting factor to development. The baseline condition has been adjusted to reflect removal of the Novartis/Nestle facility and the addition of recent planned redevelopment for that site. The baseline does not incorporate the already constructed portions of the West End Development. All development at the West End, existing and planned, is captured within the analysis below. Sanitary use under both the Phase 1 Office and Full Office Scenarios falls beneath the thresholds identified in the AUAR and within the available capacity of the current MCES interceptor (7.4 MGD), as shown in Table 1. Table 1: Net Sanitary Peak Flow Phase 1 Office (MGD) Full Office (MGD) Existing Average Daily Flow1 2.6 2.6 Average Daily Flow Increase – Already Constructed 0.169 0.169 Average Daily Flow Increase – Planned 0.279 0.322 Average Daily Flow Decrease 0.506 0.506 Net Average Daily Flow Adjustment -0.058 -0.015 Total Average Daily Flow (Existing + Net Flow Adjustment) 2.542 2.585 Peak Hourly Flow (2.7 Peak Factor) 6.865 6.979 Peak Hourly flow (2.37 Peak Factor) 6.026 6.126 1 The same Existing Average Daily Flow number has been used since the original AUAR in 2006; it has not been updated by the City. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8e) Title: 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page 45 Page 3 kimley-horn.com 2550 University Avenue West, Suite 238N, St. Paul, MN 55114 651-645-4197 Water Use Analysis Water capacity is not anticipated to be a limiting factor to development. With the changes in water capacity infrastructure and guidelines, baseline information has been updated. This City of St. Louis Park updated baseline water use numbers in winter 2015, and this updated baseline includes the already constructed portions of the West End Development. Under the Phase 1 Office Scenario and Full Office Scenario, 86.78 and 87.76 percent of the total system would be utilized, respectively, which is under the city’s preferred 90 percent threshold (see Table 2). Table 2: Water Use Summary Phase 1 Office Full Office Total Firm System Capacity (MGD) 12.24 12.24 City Firm Peak Usage (MGD) 9.83 9.83 Capacity Available (MGD) 2.41 2.41 Proposed Project Usage (MGD) 0.792 0.912 Total City Usage (MGD) 10.622 10.742 Capacity Available (Post-Construction) (MGD) 1.618 1.498 Percent of Total System Utilized 86.78 87.76 Traffic Analysis With the Phase 1 Office Scenario, peak hour trips are within the AUAR thresholds, but under the Full Office Scenario the AUAR thresholds are exceeded in the AM peak hour (outbound movement)2 by 20 trips (see Tables 3 and 4). Table 3: Estimated Phase 1 Office Scenario Traffic Compared to AUAR Thresholds AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour In Out In Out Estimated Trips 629 500 956 1,102 AUAR Trip Generation Limit 1,320 528 1,167 1,883 Table 4: Estimated Full Office Scenario Traffic Compared to AUAR Thresholds AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour In Out In Out Estimated Trips 984 548 1,024 1,435 AUAR Trip Generation Limit 1,320 528 1,167 1,883 2 Vehicles exiting the site City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8e) Title: 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page 46 Page 4 kimley-horn.com 2550 University Avenue West, Suite 238N, St. Paul, MN 55114 651-645-4197 Mitigation measures identified in the AUAR were designed to accommodate the heaviest traffic period, which is the PM peak outbound. The traffic mitigation that has already been implemented for the West End Development accommodates the PM peak. As illustrated in Tables 3 and 4, the AM peak outbound movement is much lower than the PM peak. Therefore, it is unlikely that this exceedance in the AM peak hour will present a capacity issue or require additional mitigation. The mitigation measures implemented in previous phases of development already provide the capacity needed. Traffic is not anticipated to be a limiting factor to the proposed development. A more detailed summary of traffic is provided in Tables 5 and 6. Table 5: Phase 1 Office Scenario Traffic Summary3 Land Use Size Daily Trips AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour In Out In Out Office 335,710 SF 2,536 357 49 68 334 Retail (Two Restaurants Removed) 346,674 SF 14,863 218 139 624 676 Apartments 853 units 5,672 85 341 331 178 Hotel 126 rooms 1,029 39 27 39 37 Trip Generation Subtotal 24,101 699 556 1,062 1,225 Multi-Use Reduction (-10%) -2,410 -70 -56 -106 -123 TOTAL 21,691 629 500 956 1,102 AUAR Trip Generation Limits 1,320 528 1,167 1,883 Table 6: Full Office Scenario Traffic Summary3 Land Use Size Daily Trips AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour In Out In Out Office 706,706 SF 5,339 751 102 144 703 Retail (Two Restaurants Removed) 346,674 SF 14,863 218 139 624 676 Apartments 853 units 5,672 85 341 331 178 Hotel 126 rooms 1,029 39 27 39 37 Trip Generation Subtotal 26,904 1,093 609 1,138 1,594 Multi-Use Reduction (-10%) -2,690 -109 -61 -114 -159 TOTAL 24,214 984 548 1,024 1,435 AUAR Trip Generation Limits 1,320 528 1,167 1,883 3 Trip generation calculations as documented in the 2007 West End AUAR were based on ITE Trip Generation, 7th Edition (2003). Current trip generation calculations are based on the most recent version, ITE Trip Generation, 9th Edition (2012). City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8e) Title: 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page 47 Page 5 kimley-horn.com 2550 University Avenue West, Suite 238N, St. Paul, MN 55114 651-645-4197 Trip generation rates for retail uses are generalized for purposes of this analysis and to remain consistent with methodology employed throughout various AUAR scenarios and development reviews. However, the diversity of actual retail uses may result in differing trip rates per use. For instance, a grocery store has a much higher daily trip rate than a restaurant. Depending on specific access points and flows of traffic, this may create delay at certain intersections. While the daily trip rate used for this analysis attempts to average out the uses, traffic monitoring or a more detailed traffic study is recommended following construction of the first office building. Summary SANITARY SEWER Sanitary sewer usage generated by the Phase 1 Office and Full Office Scenarios can be accommodated within the limits established in the original AUAR. No additional mitigation is needed. WATER USE Water use is anticipated to be under the AUAR thresholds and the City’s preferred 90 percent total system usage for both the Phase 1 Office and Full Office Scenarios. No additional mitigation is needed. TRAFFIC Traffic generated by the Phase 1 Office Scenario is beneath the limits established in the AUAR, but the AM peak hour outbound movement exceeds the AUAR threshold by 20 trips for the Full Office Scenario. No additional mitigation measures or adjustments are anticipated at this time because the AM peak is accommodated in the capacity of the transportation system, which was designed to accommodate the higher PM peak volumes. Following construction of the first office building, traffic monitoring or a more detailed traffic study is recommended. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8e) Title: 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page 48 TRAVEL DEMAND MANAGEMENT PLAN 10 West End Redevelopment Central Park West St. Louis Park, MN Golden Valley, MN Prepared for: Ryan Companies and Excelsior Group Prepared by: August 2016 City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8e) Title: 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page 49 INTRODUCTION This document serves as the Travel Demand Management (TDM) Plan for the 10 West End Site within the West End Redevelopment located in the southwest quadrant of I-394 and TH 100. As expressed in this document, The Excelsior Group is committed to applying this TDM Plan to the proposed office buildings that will be Phase 4 of the overall project. The cities of St. Louis Park and Golden Valley have established an overlay zoning district and a joint task force to address congestion mitigation strategies. The Task Force reviews Travel Demand Management (TDM) Plans for development in the established I-394 overlay zoning district. The 10 West End site lies within Zone A of the overlay district (City of St. Louis Park Code, Article IV, Sections 36-321 through 36-330). PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed development site is located east of Utica Avenue and is known as Central Park West. It is 13.48 acres in size, and the eastern 6 acres of the site are in the City of Golden Valley. Central Park West, LLC owns the north half and is currently constructing two 6-story multi-family residential buildings and a 6-story limited service hotel. The Excelsior Group has acquired the south 7.30 +/- acres of Central Park West, which is Phase 4 and 5 of the overall development. This site is mostly vacant land with some surface parking lots. Phase 4 (1st phase of office) of the development will be the 11-story office building proposed in this PUD application. Phase 5 (2nd phase of office) will include a second office tower with an expansion to the Phase 4 parking ramp in the future. There have been several planning and infrastructure studies for the development. This proposed project, “10 West End” is very consistent with the previous planning efforts. The office building and parking ramp are slightly smaller than the development p lans and therefore are within the utility demands and traffic study assumptions. 10 West End will provide enough office space to house at least 1,500 workers. This addition to the workforce will add to the already vibrant population of the West End neig hborhood. Limited ground floor retail has been planned to open up to the building lobby as well as the adjacent park, providing active ground floor use that will benefit the building tenants, neighbors, and the general public. Bike and pedestrian activity will be encouraged with extensive landscaping, outdoor patios and bike parking both inside and out. 10 West End is a next generation office development, threading a creative workplace into a vibrant community through thoughtful architecture and site design. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND ALTERNATIVE TRANSIT OPPORTUNITIES Pedestrian and Bicycle The Central Park West development Site currently contains some sidewalk infrastructure along the south side of Wayzata Boulevard and the west side of Utica Avenue. The land on the proposed development is currently vacant and contains informal gravel lots off of unofficial curb cuts, old bituminous parking lots for the razed office buildings, and other vacant land. Utica Avenue and Wayzata City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8e) Title: 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page 50 Boulevard currently contain no dedicated bicycle infrastructure. However, the site is located a short distance from the Cedar Lake Trail, a bicycle and pedestrian pathway that runs from downtown Minneapolis to Chanhassen and other southwestern suburban communities. The Cedar Lake Trail carries a significant amount of commuter and recreational bicyclists. The Phase I area of the West End Development contains various pedestrian and bicycle amenities. Sidewalks were constructed along both sides of West 16th Street and West End Boulevard, as well as adjoining sidewalks to the grocer tenant and the main passageway from West End Boulevard to Park Place Boulevard. Some sidewalks are separated from the street by pervious green space, and others contain various urban design elements like potters, benches, street lighting, waste receptacles, and artistic bollards. Crosswalks are designated by various brick and stone material that differs from the bituminous roadway. Sidewalk space is lacking on Duke Drive east of the main shopping street. Although there is no designated bike lane infrastructure on the roadways, bike racks are located in front of the grocery tenant and near other retail tenants throughout the development. Bike racks and shower facilities are available at the Moneygram building and the 1600 Towers south of the development for tenants who bike to work. Transit The area is currently served by several bus routes operated by Metro Transit. The routes that serve the area are listed below:  Route 9: The route 9 bus serves the site along Park Place Boulevard and Wayzata Boulevard, and also has limited service along Highway 100. This local bus service connects to Cedar Lake Road and travels west to County Road 73. It also provides service into Golden Valley to the north and east of the TMP area, and moves into downtown Minneapolis. It continues through downtown and terminates in south Minneapolis at the 46th Street Blue Line LRT Station. Service is offered seven days a week all year. Buses on this route run from approximately 5:00 AM to 1:00 AM during the week. The route contains 15 to 20 minute headways during rush hour, 30 minute headways midday and evenings, and 30 to 60 minute headways on the weekend.  Route 604: The route 604 bus runs west from the Park Place/I-394 Park & Ride lot near the Xenia-Park Place interchange down Wayzata Boulevard to the Louisiana Avenue Transit Center. It then continues south on Louisiana Avenue through St. Louis Park to Excelsior Boulevard, where it moves to and terminates at the Excelsior & Grand shopping district. Service is offered Monday through Friday during rush hour and midday periods, and runs from 7:30 AM to 4:30 PM. The route operates approximately once per hour during the service time.  Route 649: The route 649 bus loops along Wayzata Boulevard, Park Place Boulevard, Cedar Lake Road and Louisiana Avenue and provides limited-stop service along I-394 into downtown Minneapolis. Service is offered Monday through Friday during rush hour periods. It operates from approximately 6:15 AM to 8:30 AM, and from 4:00 PM to 6:30PM. The route operates every 30 minutes during the service time. To encourage residents and visitors to utilize transit, expansion of existing routes – such as offering the 649 route every day during the week – should occur to serve the site. Adding new City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8e) Title: 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page 51 routes that run directly from the West End into downtown Minneapolis would also help facilitate higher transit ridership to and from the development. Surrounding Amenities The Central Park West development Site is across the street from The Shops at West End, which contain various types of restaurants, a movie theater, a Cub Foods grocery store, and other retail outlets. The site is also within walking distance to several other stores and restaurants across Park Place Boulevard, as well as an Olive Garden restaurant at the corner of Wayzata Boulevard and Utica Avenue. In addition, the existing Moneygram building has a fitness center facility complete with showers and locker rooms that is available to employees in the Moneygram and 1600 Tower buildings. The site is also near newly finished and currently under construction apartment buildings north of 16th Street, as well as a Hilton-based Homewood Suites hotel. Also nearby is the DLC Residential development, which will consist of apartments and a hotel. IMPLEMENTATION OF REQUIRED ROAD IMPROVEMENTS A number of roadway improvements were required by the AUAR and traffic study completed for the Central Park West development. The approved project site plan resulted in a refinement of the improvements needed and these are outlined in the developer’s agreement between the City of St. Louis Park, the City of Golden Valley, and DLC Residential. The majority of the required improvements will be constructed between 2015 and 2020. As a result of these improvements being implemented, the intersections in and around the project are expected to operate at acceptable (LOS D or better) levels of service with the redevelopment. Planned Road Improvements Utica Avenue:  Reconstruct existing section of Utica Avenue between Wayzata Boulevard and the Moneygram building entrance. Build four total vehicular lanes with a center grassy median separating northbound and southbound traffic.  Construct a privately owned but publically accessible linear park past 16th Street that will assist pedestrians and bicyclists to access the various buildings. These road and park improvements have been designed by, and will be constructed by DLC Residential. Planned Trail and Sidewalk Improvements In addition to road improvements a number of sidewalks will be added for pedestrian and bicycle mobility. The developer has agreed to:  Construct improvements to the sidewalk on the south side of Wayzata Boulevard.  Construct the linear park and fund all urban design elements within its grounds, including decorative lighting, benches, trash receptacles, and general open space that will be accessible to the public. GOAL AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES The overall goal of this plan is to reduce potential traffic congestion that will come with the proposed development. This will occur by maintaining or improving acceptable levels of service on the roadways within and adjacent to the project site, minimizing the projected number of trips through adjacent City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8e) Title: 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page 52 intersections during the PM peak hour, and continuously encouraging alternative transportation use within each component in the development. The general road improvements mixed with pedestrian amenities, bicycle infrastructure, and better transit service will all assist in achieving the goal. PROPOSED TMP STRATEGIES The Excelsior Group in coordination with building managers will pursue the following objectives and strategies to achieve its Traffic Management Plan. Objectives and Strategies – Overall Development TDM Friendly Design  Mixed Use Development: A hotel and residential component have been proposed for the subjected site in phase one, and the proposed office space will be constructed in Phases 4 and 5. The hotel and residential uses will help overall traffic flow because the two uses have traditionally different traffic flow peak times during the day. The Shops at West End will also encourage residents and hotel guests alike to stay nearby for shopping, entertainment, and grocery needs. This will reduce the number of vehicular trips that leave the site in the PM peak hour. Commuters to the office buildings in the future will counter traffic flows from residents, thus decreasing the likelihood of concentrated roadway congestion.  Residential Component: In the I-394 Overlay Zoning District language for both St. Louis Park and Golden Valley, it is encouraged to develop residential uses within the corridor to reduce PM peak traffic volumes in one direction. This development includes two separate 6-story apartment buildings containing 363 dwelling units. Residents in these units will likely either be reverse commuting from areas other than the West End vicinity in the afternoon, or will be working in the nearby office buildings, thus helping reduce PM traffic congestion.  Shared Parking: A mixed-use development of this type provides opportunities for shared parking among different uses, reducing the overall number of parking spaces needed on-site. The fully built out pedestrian infrastructure within the site will help site users access shops, hotels, and residences by walking instead of driving. A parking structure in the east side of the property will help alleviate office parking concerns and spillover, and will improve direct traffic flow into the development.  Designated Hotel Guest Parking: Hotel employees will be enticed to park in areas that won’t create parking lot bottlenecks, and will be encouraged to seek alternative commuting methods like biking, walking, or taking transit. This will allow the hotel to hold sufficient parking spaces for its guests, thus reducing internal vehicular trips (guests driving around to find a more convenient parking space). The hotel lot will also have specific signage that will discourage non- guests from parking in that area.  Underground Residential Parking: The development plan calls for underground parking for residents in the apartment buildings, thus reducing parking conflicts in surrounding hotel and office parking areas.  Delivery Truck Reductions: Deliveries via truck will be minimized due to the general lack of need for shipments to the residential buildings. Delivery Trucks will be discouraged to deliver between 10 pm and 8 am. Trucks needed for any use on the site will enter at the curb cut near the corner of Wayzata Boulevard and Lilac Lane. Garbage collection will be carefully scheduled during the day to minimize impacts on residents and public. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8e) Title: 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page 53  Pedestrian Access: Bike and pedestrian activity will be encouraged with extensive landscaping, outdoor patios and bike parking both inside and out. 10 West End is a next generation office development, threading a creative workplace into a vibrant community through thoughtful architecture and site design. An emphasis will be placed on pedestrian connections within the development. This will promote a walkable, bike-friendly development that will activate the street fronts.  Bicycle Access: Wayfinding signs will direct bicycle riders to ride south to the Cedar Lake Trail. Bicycles will also be allowed within the “woonerf” and linear park space. The office building will have facilities dedicated to bike commuters. Bicycle parking inside the building will provide space for about 108 bikes. There will also be shower facilities for 0.5% of the FTE (Full Time Equivalent) employees. For bike commuters there are several off site bike ways including the North Cedar Lake Regional Trail that runs from West End to Downtown Minneapolis. Once on site there are clear bike lanes that pass through the park and connect to the proposed bike racks. 18 total racks are provided split between the front and back of the building. Objectives and Strategies – Phase IV Office Participate with Regional TDM Organizations to Provide Information on Transportation Alternatives  The property manager will serve as the office Commuter Benefits Coordinator (CBC) position to coordinate with Metro Transit and officials from trail network entities.  Display transit and trail maps in locations within the office building. Support and Promote Bicycling and Walking as Alternatives  Build and maintain pedestrian-friendly space within and alongside development site.  Prioritize pedestrian movements over automobile movements at intersections by designating crosswalks with different paving material.  Actively display updated biking information, such as commuting tips and trail maps, in the lobbies of each building.  Include indoor and outdoor bike storage facilities to employees.  Add a fitness center and showers into one of the office building. These amenities will be accessible to employees who wish to walk or bike to work. Support and Promote Transit as an Alternative  Encourage Metro Transit to increase frequency of existing service or add new direct service into downtown Minneapolis from turnaround area.  Managers of each office suite will be encouraged by property management to facilitate the sale of bus passes to employees, and will provide detailed transit information to office visitors. The CBC (property manager) will encourage office tenants to use alternative commuting methods, and will sell bus passes to employees in addition to the managers of each office suite. Support and Promote Carpooling and Vanpooling  Promote carpool and vanpool by providing dedicated preferred parking stalls for carpools.  Look into viability to add parking spaces for rideshare services, such as ZipCar or HourCar.  Rideshare parking spaces may be either added or designated. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8e) Title: 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page 54 Monitoring  Once offices are 75% occupied, send survey to employees to gather interest and supply information about alternative transportation.  After 6 months of occupancy, property manager to survey tenant on transportation usage.  Property manager will evaluate effectiveness of strategies and modify the plan accordingly. TDM IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Developer(s) will be responsible to implement this plan upon completion of the Central Park West development. These obligations will run with the land in the event that portions of the project are sold to third parties. The steps to plan implementation are outlined below: 1) Property manager will be trained to serve as transportation coordinators and to follow plan implementation. These persons will coordinate with each other and with the Commuter Benefits Coordinator (CBC) in the future office buildings. 2) Once the office buildings are 75% occupied, the property manager will conduct a commuter survey to estimate participation in alternative modes of transportation. 3) The property manager will work with Metro Transit to inform all tenants regarding all alternative transportation options available to them for commuting. 4) The City of St. Louis Park will be completing an updated traffic study of the area with the implemented road improvements following the completion of Phase 4. The City of Golden Valley has not committed to completing this study at this time. Once the St. Louis Park updated traffic study is completed, the CBCs will meet with staff from the City of St. Louis Park and the City of Golden Valley to determine if traffic is operating at acceptable levels. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8e) Title: 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page 55 TRAVEL MANAGEMENT MEASURE STATUS TARGET DATE TDM Friendly Design Mixed Use Development – establish uses with separate peak traffic flows 2020 Pedestrian Access – establish good sidewalk connections 2018 Bicycle Access – establish good biking infrastructure 2018 TDM Organization Collaboration Create CBC position for office buildings 2020 Display non-vehicular transportation information 2018 Incentivize tenants to commute using alternative transportation 2018 Promote Walking & Biking Build and maintain good pedestrian spaces 2018 Create designated biking infrastructure 2018 Actively update walking & biking information within building lobbies 2018 Promote Transit Use Encourage Metro Transit to extend service or add new service to area 2018 Have tenants facilitate selling bus passes to employees. 2018 Promote Car/Vanpooling Have tenants pair residents for potential carpool arrangements 2018 Distribute carpool & vanpool information to tenants 2018 Look into viability for rideshare service implementation 2018 Look into improving rideshare parking spaces 2018 Monitoring Send commuting survey to tenants once office is 75% occupied and office is open 2018 Evaluate effectiveness of strategies and modify plan in coordination with concierges, CBC, and officials from the Cities of St. Louis Park and Golden Valley 2020 City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8e) Title: 10 West End - Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat Page 56 Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: August 15, 2016 Action Agenda Item: 8f EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Meadowbrook Manor – Conditional Use Permit RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution granting a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for Meadowbrook Manor and allowing construction of a Clubhouse, Swimming Pool and Maintenance Shed, and associated grading work at 6922-6932 Meadowbrook Blvd, subject to conditions recommended by Staff. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the CUP request meet the criteria of the Zoning Ordinance? SUMMARY: Applicant, Sambetek, Inc., on behalf of the owner, Meadowbrook Manor Apartments, LLC is requesting approval of a conditional use permit to do construction within a multi-family residential development in the R-4 Multiple Family Residence Zoning District. Meadowbrook Manor was originally constructed prior to the conditional use permit requirement for multiple-family residential developments within the R-4 Zoning District and is a legal non- conforming development within the city. This request helps bring the overall property closer to compliance and assures the new construction is in full compliance with St. Louis Park’s existing zoning ordinance. The Planning Commission reviewed this matter on July 20 and recommended approval with a 5-0 vote. Attached are the unofficial minutes from the Planning Commission meeting FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged community. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion Resolution Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Development Plans Prepared by: Jennifer Monson, Planner Reviewed by: Sean Walther, Planning and Zoning Supervisor Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8f) Page 2 Title: Meadowbrook Manor – Conditional Use Permit DISCUSSION Zoning District(s): R-4 Multiple-Family Residential Comprehensive Plan: Medium Density Residential Applicant: Sambetek, Inc. Owner: Meadowbrook Manor Apartments, LLC Location: The property is located at the northwest corner of Louisiana Ave and Excelsior Blvd Construction would occur north of Meadowbrook Blvd Review Deadline: 60 Days: 8/19/2016 120 Days: 10/18/2016 Location: City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8f) Page 3 Title: Meadowbrook Manor – Conditional Use Permit Proposal: The applicant proposes to construct an 11,484 square foot clubhouse, swimming pool, ten surface parking spaces, detention pond, and significant landscape additions in place of the existing 2,585 square foot apartment building located at 6922-6932 Meadowbrook Blvd. The proposal includes the addition of a new 3,696 square foot maintenance shed and a conditional use permit to remove 5,000 cubic yards of fill from the site. Multiple-family residences are allowed by Conditional Use Permit in the R4 district. The zoning ordinance allows clubhouses, pools, and maintenance facilities as accessory uses to a multiple- family residential development. A conditional use permit is also required to move more than 400 cubic yards of soil. The proposed plans requires the excavation of approximately 5,000 cubic yards of soil. Existing Conditions Clubhouse: The 1.74 acre area of the work on the property currently includes a six-unit townhome building, lawn, and basketball court. The proposal is to demolish the 6-unit townhome building and basketball court. Proposed Clubhouse: If approved, Meadowbrook Manor Apartments, LLC will construct an 11,484 square foot clubhouse, swimming pool, ten surface parking spaces, bicycle parking facilities, a detention pond, and significant landscape additions. Existing Conditions Maintenance Shed: The property is improved with nine surface parking stalls. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8f) Page 4 Title: Meadowbrook Manor – Conditional Use Permit Proposed Maintenance Shed: If approved, Meadowbrook Manor Apartments, LLC will construct a 3,696 square foot maintenance shed to house additional maintenance equipment to serve the development. The construction would remove five parking spaces in this location. Site Plan: The proposed clubhouse is located on Meadowbrook Block 003 and Meadowbrook Block 004 north of Meadowbrook Blvd, east of Meadowbrook Lane, west of Louisiana Ave, and south of Minnehaha Creek. The overall Meadowbrook Manor site is 25.94 acres and the proposed project would disturb 1.74 acres. The applicant has submitted paperwork demonstrating to the city that the applicant has requested the combination of Block 003 and Block 004 in Hennepin County records. The two parcels will be consolidated prior to building occupancy. Access: The clubhouse parking lot is accessed via a driveway from Meadowbrook Blvd. while the maintenance shed is accessed via a parking lot accessed from Meadowbrook Blvd. There are sidewalks being reconstructed on the south side of the clubhouse parking lot fronting Meadowbrook Blvd with connections from the sidewalk to the clubhouse on both the east and west edges of the parking lot. Main access to the pool area will be provided through the clubhouse building, and there will be additional gate access to the pool on the north side of the clubhouse. The pool access will be electronically controlled through the use of electronic key fobs. Maintenance access for the detention pond and pool will be provided by an unimproved connection off a residential parking lot accessed via Meadowbrook Lane. Parking: The Meadowbrook Manor Apartment Community has a total of 423 parking spaces, not including spaces located on-street or within garages. The existing clubhouse site will add ten additional off-street parking spaces along Meadowbrook Blvd. These spaces are reserved for clubhouse users including clubhouse visitors, future tenants, and leasing agents. The proposed maintenance shed requires the removal of five parking spaces. The overall onsite parking counts will increase by five parking spaces with the approval of this project. Two of the added spaces will be ADA accessible. Staff finds that the parking requirement for the clubhouse and maintenance shed is met. Bicycle Parking: There is currently no dedicated bicycle parking provided throughout the Meadowbrook Manor Apartment complex. The proposed clubhouse would provide five dedicated bicycle parking spaces located near the entrance to the clubhouse. Staff finds that the bicycle parking requirement for the clubhouse and maintenance shed is met. Landscaping: City Code requires at least 1 tree per 1,000 square feet of gross building floor area. There are currently four canopy trees and one ornamental tree on the clubhouse site. A total of 18 trees are required for the clubhouse and maintenance shed. The applicant proposes to add 27 canopy trees and 15 ornamental trees surrounding the clubhouse and pool area. City Code also requires at least six shrubs per 1,000 square feet of floor area. There are a total of three existing shrubs on the clubhouse site. A total of 105 shrubs are required to comply with city code. The applicant proposes the addition of 162 shrubs surrounding the clubhouse and pool area. Staff finds that the landscaping requirement is met. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8f) Page 5 Title: Meadowbrook Manor – Conditional Use Permit Designed Outdoor Recreation Area (DORA): The DORA requirements for the development is at least 12% of the building lot. Approximately 15.55% of the Meadowbrook Manor Community property, including the addition of the swimming pool, is open and accessible via private sidewalks to community residents. Meadowbrook Manor Apartments have also provided easements to access a recreational trail on Minnehaha Creek. Staff finds that the DORA requirement is met. Architecture: The exterior materials for the clubhouse and maintenance building are primarily glass, brick, stone, stucco, and fiber-cement board siding and metal. City Code requires each elevation to have at least 60% Class 1 materials on each elevation if the elevation can be seen from offsite. Of the materials listed above, glass, brick, stone, and 10% of the fiber-cement board siding are considered Class 1. The remaining materials are Class 2. The material breakdown by elevation follows: Clubhouse Elevation: Class 1 Class 2 North 67.2% 32.8% South 79.7% 20.3% West 67.8% 32.2% East 66.9% 33.1% Maintenance Building Elevation: Class 1 Class 2 North NA 100.0% South 72.7% 27.3% West 66.4% 33.6% East 80.7% 19.3% The north elevation on the maintenance building does not meet the minimum Class 1 materials requirement. The north elevation of the maintenance building is exempt from this requirement as it is not visible from properties off site. The north elevation faces Minnehaha Creek and is located on top of a steep bank. Stormwater: The site is currently 39.6% impervious. The proposal will slightly increase the impervious surface to 41.1%. The stormwater requirements for the clubhouse and maintenance shed are met through the construction of a new detention pond located on the north side of the site. Engineering has reviewed the detention pond and finds it meets all requirements. Utilities: All new and updated utilities will be placed below ground. The applicant has also agreed to install a broadband connection from the clubhouse structure to Meadowbrook Boulevard for future city broadband connections. Conditional Use Permit for Excavating: The applicant proposes to remove 5,000 cubic yards of material from the site in order to construct the clubhouse, pool, and detention pond. The applicant proposes to excavate approximately nine truck trips per day for the first 60 days of construction for a total of 60 trips. The applicant shall follow MNDOT standards for hauling and disposal of materials. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8f) Page 6 Title: Meadowbrook Manor – Conditional Use Permit The designated truck routes include Meadowbrook Blvd., Excelsior Blvd., and Louisiana Ave. Construction Hours: The applicant proposes construction between September 16, 2016 through March 16, 2017 with construction occurring on weekdays between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. and on weekends from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Neighborhood Meeting: A neighborhood meeting was conducted on July 6, 2016 at 6:30 p.m. at the St. Louis Park Municipal Service Center. There were three members of the community in attendance, including the Meadowbrook Collaborative Coordinator. The following was discussed: 1. Are rental rate increases in response to the construction of the clubhouse? Management was present and assured the concerned citizens that the construction of the clubhouse is not contributing to the rise in rental rates. The rise in rental rates is in direct response to the housing market in the area. Rates at Meadowbrook Manor have historically been below market value, and even with the increase in rent are considered affordable for the area. 2. Interest in the amenities within the clubhouse: There will be a model apartment unit for prospective tenants, the leasing office, a theater space, a business center, a fitness center, a game room, a club room, and an after-hours secure package pickup area, which will allow residents to pick up packages after the leasing office is closed. Additional concerns were raised from a resident via email. The following concerns were included: 1. Increased rental rates due to the clubhouse. 2. Lack of interest for residential use of the clubhouse. 3. A waste of water resources for a pool, the potential of wildlife being attracted to the pool, and potential risks to the environment if the pool develops leaks. 4. Concern for noise from use of the pool. 5. Potential lack of maintenance of the pool area. Recommendation: Planning Commission and staff recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit for the property and allowing construction of the clubhouse, pool, parking lot, detention area and maintenance building and excavation of 5,000 cubic yards of material subject to the conditions in the attached resolution. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8f) Page 7 Title: Meadowbrook Manor – Conditional Use Permit RESOLUTION NO. 16-____ A RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT UNDER SECTIONS 36-166(d)(1) AND 36-79(a) OF THE ST. LOUIS PARK ORDINANCE CODE RELATING TO ZONING FOR MEADOWBROOK MANOR TO PERMIT CONSTRUCTION OF A CLUBHOUSE AND MAINTENANCE BUILDING FOR PROPERTY ZONED R-4 MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT LOCATED AT 6922-6932 MEADOWBROOK BOULEVARD WHEREAS, Sambetek Inc, on behalf of owners Meadowbrook Manor LLC. has made application to the City Council for a Conditional Use Permit under Sections 36-166(d)(1) and 36- 79(a) of the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code for Meadowbrook Manor the purpose of constructing a clubhouse and maintenance shed within an R-4 Multiple-Family Residential Zoning District resulting in export of 5,000 cubic yards of soil at the property located at 6922-6932 Meadowbrook Boulevard. The Meadowbrook Manor property is legally described as set forth in Exhibit “A” attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the property is an existing multiple-family dwelling complex containing 551 dwelling units in multiple buildings; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission (Case No. 16-24-CUP) and the effect of the proposed clubhouse and maintenance shed on the health, safety and welfare of the community, the consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, and compliance with the intent of the Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the construction of the clubhouse and maintenance shed will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of the community, and that the request is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the contents of Planning Case File 16-24-CUP are hereby entered into and made part of the public hearing record and record of decision for this case; and WHEREAS, the site is developed, used, and maintained in conformance with Official Exhibits, required permits are obtained prior to construction, and documentation certifying that the clubhouse and maintenance shed are in accordance with state building code. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, the St. Louis Park City Council hereby approves a Conditional Use Permit for construction of a clubhouse and maintenance shed and to export more than 5,000 cubic yards of soil at 6922 – 6932 Meadowbrook Boulevard, subject to the following conditions: 1) The site shall be developed, used and maintained in conformance with the Official Exhibits. 2) Prior to starting construction: a. The assent form and official exhibits must be signed by applicant and/or owner. b. A preconstruction meeting shall be held with the appropriate development, construction, private utility, and City representatives. c. All necessary permits shall be obtained, including but not limited to: i. NPDES Grading/Construction Permit. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8f) Page 8 Title: Meadowbrook Manor – Conditional Use Permit ii. City of St. Louis Park Erosion Control and Building Permits. iii. A stormwater management permit from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. 3) Prior to starting any land disturbing activities, excluding demolition, the documentation for combining Block 003 and Block 004 shall be submitted to Hennepin County. 4) Stormwater Management: a. The drainage system is private and shall be privately owned and maintained. A maintenance agreement shall be recorded against the property. b. A stormwater pollution prevention plan will be required showing appropriate erosion control devices. c. A complete soils report shall be submitted prior to permitting. d. Pond discharge shall be coordinated with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. 5) Documentation certifying that the clubhouse and maintenance shed are in accordance with state building code. 6) The developer and contractor shall follow the procedures and requirements for this development as required for Demolition and New Construction or Major Additions to single- family homes are required to do under City Code 6-71 Construction Management Plan. 7) In addition to any other remedies, the developer or owner shall pay an administrative fee of $750 per violation of any condition of this approval. 8) This permit shall be revoked and cancelled if the structure for which the conditional use permit is granted is removed. The City Clerk is instructed to record certified copies of this resolution in the Office of the Hennepin County Register of Deeds or Registrar of Titles as the case may be. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council August 15, 2016 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8f) Page 9 Title: Meadowbrook Manor – Conditional Use Permit “EXHIBIT A” LEGAL DESCRIPTION Blocks 1, 2, 3, and 4, Meadowbrook Manor, Hennepin County, Minnesota. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8f) Page 10 Title: Meadowbrook Manor – Conditional Use Permit Excerpt – Official Minutes PLANNING COMMISSION ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA JULY 20, 2016 – 6:00 p.m. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 3. Public Hearings C. Meadowbrook Manor Clubhouse – Conditional Use Permit Location: 6922-6932 Meadowbrook Blvd. Applicant: Sambetek, Inc. Case No.: 16-24-CUP Jennifer Monson, Planner, stated the request is for a conditional use permit for construction of a clubhouse, swimming pool, ten surface parking spaces, detention pond, and significant landscape additions. The construction will require demolition of the existing six-unit townhome building. She explained that the complex was originally constructed prior to the conditional use permit requirement and it has been a legal non-conforming development within the city. The request for a CUP will bring the overall property closer to compliance with current zoning standards. Commissioner Robertson commented that the 7 a.m. weekend construction start time is earlier than code allows. Commissioner Carper asked if there was a pass-through trail on the property. Ms. Monson said the trail access along Minnehaha Creek will continue. Commissioner Person asked if the streets within the complex are private. Ms. Monson replied that they are city streets and are maintained by the city. Eric Miller, Sambetek, said their intent is to comply with the city’s ordinance on construction hours. He answered questions about the storm sewer system. Commissioner Carper asked if there were any dog walking areas. He asked if there was any space for resident garden plots. Mr. Miller said the site is fairly open with ample space for dog walking. Ted Bigos, owner, said there are no existing garden plots and no plans for them. He said there has been no demand for them. Vice Chair Peilen opened the public hearing. No one was present to speak and she closed the public hearing. Sean Walther, Planning and Zoning Supervisor, stated that weekend construction start time is 9 a.m. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8f) Page 11 Title: Meadowbrook Manor – Conditional Use Permit Commissioner Robertson made a motion recommending approval of the Conditional Use Permit with an amendment to weekend construction start time. Commissioner Carper seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 5-0. SITE7/13/2016 11:51:40 AMMEADOWBROOKCLUBHOUSE6860 Excelsior BoulevardSt. Louis Park, MN 55426COVER SHEETT1-07/13/2016 11:51:40 AMMEADOWBROOKCLUBHOUSE6860 Excelsior BoulevardSt. Louis Park, MN 55426COVER SHEETT1-0MEADOWBROOK CLUBHOUSEST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55426DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL: JULY 13, 2016Project TeamOwner/Developer:Meadowbrook Manor Apartments, LLC8325 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 200Golden Valley, MN 55426Ph: 952-938-6329Architect:Doran Architects, LLC7803 Glenroy RoadBloomington, MN 55349Ph: 612-288-2000Contractor:Doran Construction Company, LLC7803 Glenroy RoadBloomington, MN 55349Ph: 612-288-2000Civil:Sambatek12800 Whitewater Drive Suite 300Minnetonka, MN 55343Ph: 763 476-6010Site MapSheet IndexGENERALT1-0COVER SHEETARCHITECTURALA0-02CONTEXT PHOTOSA1-00MODEL VIEWSA1-10MODEL VIEWS - MAINTENANCEA2-00FLOOR PLAN - LOWER LEVELA2-01FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 1A2-10FLOOR PLAN - MAINTENANCEA3-02ELEVATIONS - NORTH/SOUTH - COLORA3-03ELEVATIONS - EAST/WEST - COLORA3-11ELEVATIONS - MAINTENANCE - COLORDesign NarrativeThe proposed project includes demolition of a single building containing six townhome units. The structure will be replaced with acommunity amenity building, known as The Clubhouse, for residents of the complex and their guests. The Clubhouse willfeature leasing and management offices, a large club room for gatherings, fitness facilities, a game room, and a theatre, as wellas a model unit. The Clubhouse will be fully sprinklered. Eighteen new parking spaces will be dedicated for the communitybuilding.The materials palette of the Clubhouse will blend well with the adjacent buildings, employing a similar red brick, punchedwindows, with accents of black metal. The gabled roof is also respective of the existing structures. Due to grading on the site,the Clubhouse will be a single story at the front, and have a walk out lower level providing access to the pool deck.In combination with the indoor amenities, an outdoor pool, grilling station and fire pit will be adjacent to the community building.The pool deck will provide ample seating and be screened with multiple new trees.A new maintenance/storage building will also be constructed on the site. This new maintenance/storage building will relocateexisting maintenance functions on the site from seven currently occupied garage spaces, which will be reallocated back toresidential use.Land Planner:Sambatek12800 Whitewater Drive Suite 300Minnetonka, MN 55343Ph: 763 476-6010Surveyor:Sambatek12800 Whitewater Drive Suite 300Minnetonka, MN 55343Ph: 763 476-6010Attorney:Doran Architects, LLC7803 Glenroy RoadBloomington, MN 55349Ph: 612-288-2000Landscape:Sambatek12800 Whitewater Drive Suite 300Minnetonka, MN 55343Ph: 763 476-60106860 EXCELSIOR BOULEVARDCity Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8f) Title: Meadowbrook Manor – Conditional Use PermitPage 12 BUILDING TO BE DEMOLISHEDSITESITEBUILDING TO BE DEMOLISHED6/17/2016 3:07:48 PMMEADOWBROOKCLUBHOUSE6860 Excelsior BoulevardSt. Louis Park, MN 55426CONTEXT PHOTOSA0-021MEADOWBROOK2AERIAL VIEWN3BUILDING TO DEMOCity Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8f) Title: Meadowbrook Manor – Conditional Use PermitPage 13 7/13/2016 10:04:42 AMMEADOWBROOKCLUBHOUSE6860 Excelsior BoulevardSt. Louis Park, MN 55426MODEL VIEWSA1-001ISO - SOUTH - ENTITLEMENT2ISO - NORTH - ENTITLEMENTCity Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8f) Title: Meadowbrook Manor – Conditional Use PermitPage 14 7/13/2016 11:32:30 AMMEADOWBROOKMAINTENANCE6860 Excelsior BoulevardSt. Louis Park, MN 55426MODEL VIEWS -MAINTENANCEA1-101ISO - SOUTH - MAINTENANCE -ENTITLEMENT2ISO - NORTH - MAINTENANCE -ENTITLEMENTCity Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8f) Title: Meadowbrook Manor – Conditional Use PermitPage 15 DWREFA3-001A3-011A3-0123A4-003FT DEEP32' - 9 3/4"58' - 0"THEATER102MODEL ROOM103POOL EQUIP104COMMON SPACE106STORAGE107ELEVATOR112FITNESS113GROUP FITNESS114ARCADE115GAME ROOM1162' - 0"50' - 8"50' - 8"37' - 4"A3-021A3-031A3-03241' - 0"41' - 0"47' - 11 3/16"5' - 0"4' - 3 1/4"24' - 9"50' - 0"14' - 0"5FT DEEPPOOLLIFTFURNACEFURNACEGATE WITH ELECTRONIC KEYFOB ACCESS ON OUTSIDE OFGATE AND PANIC HARDWAREON INSIDE OF GATE.DOORS WITHELECTRONIC KEYFOB ACCESS FROMINSIDE CLUBHOUSE.6/17/2016 3:08:06 PMMEADOWBROOKCLUBHOUSE6860 Excelsior BoulevardSt. Louis Park, MN 55426FLOOR PLAN -LOWER LEVELA2-00 1/8" = 1'-0"1LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLANNCity Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8f) Title: Meadowbrook Manor – Conditional Use PermitPage 16 A3-001A3-011A3-012SHUFFLE BOARDCOFFEEIPAD BARFILESBUILT IN COUNTERCLUBROOM117CONF ROOM118STUDY119STUDY120LOBBY121RESTROOM122RESTROOM123VESTIBULE124OFFICE125CONF ROOM126OFFICE127OFFICE128WORK ROOM129PACKAGE13050' - 8"A3-002A3-021A3-022A3-031A3-03258' - 0"FURNACEFURNACECONDENSERS6FT HIGHMECHANICALSCREENCONDENSERS6FT HIGHMECHANICALSCREEN47' - 11 3/16"41' - 0"50' - 8"6/17/2016 3:08:07 PMMEADOWBROOKCLUBHOUSE6860 Excelsior BoulevardSt. Louis Park, MN 55426FLOOR PLAN -LEVEL 1A2-01 1/8" = 1'-0"1LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLANNCity Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8f) Title: Meadowbrook Manor – Conditional Use PermitPage 17 UPDNA3-101A3-104A3-102A3-10339' - 4"48' - 0"28' - 8"87' - 4"4' - 8"24' - 0"A3-114A3-112A3-111A3-1134' - 2"2' - 1"9' - 3"2' - 6"3' - 0"2' - 6"GOLFCART8' - 0"12' - 0"12' - 0"1216 SFMAINTENANCE13210' - 0"MECHA3-101A3-104A3-102A3-103A3-114A3-112A3-111A3-1131060 SFSTORAGE131FUTUREKITCHEN6/17/2016 3:08:07 PMMEADOWBROOKCLUBHOUSE6860 Excelsior BoulevardSt. Louis Park, MN 55426FLOOR PLAN -MAINTENANCEA2-10 1/8" = 1'-0"1LEVEL 1 - MAINTENANCE 1/8" = 1'-0"2LEVEL 2 - MAINTENANCENNCity Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8f) Title: Meadowbrook Manor – Conditional Use PermitPage 18 L1100' - 0"Roof line110' - 0"Parapet120' - 0"Lower Level88' - 0"4A113B3A4A5B4A4A2A2C15A17194A3B2C719192C2B3B5A5B5B5B5B5B212175B2B18175B2C5A2C5A2C2CSOUTHOVERALL 2876CLASS 1 MATERIALGLASS1001BRICK 814STONE 19010% HARDIE 286SIDING ALLOWANCECLASS 12291 79.7%EASTOVERALL729.5CLASS 1 MATERIALGLASS108BRICK 82STONE22510% HARDIE 73SIDING ALLOWANCECLASS 1488 66.9%WESTOVERALL827CLASS 1 MATERIALGLASS 72BRICK 379STONE 2710% HARDIE 83SIDING ALLOWANCECLASS 1 561 67.8%L1100' - 0"Roof line110' - 0"Parapet120' - 0"12B2B3B19204A1193A5A3B2B4A7773A5B5C5B5B5C2B12B4A4A2B5A2C2C5A3B2BNORTHOVERALL 2050CLASS 1 MATERIALGLASS636BRICK 164.5STONE 37310% HARDIE 205SIDING ALLOWANCECANOPY 39CLASS 11378.5 67.2%EXTERIOR ELEVATION KEYNOTESGLAZED BRICK (RED)1METAL PANEL B (BLACK)3BPT-1 (MEDIUM GRAY) HARDIE SIDING4AALUMINUM STOREFRONT5APREFABRICATED RAILING6SUNSHADE7OVERHEAD SECTIONAL DOOR8MECHANICAL UNIT, GRILL COLOR TO MATCHADJACENT BUILDING MATERIAL9LARGE EXTERIOR SCONCE11SMALL EXTERIOR SCONCE12WALL PACK13MECHANICAL LOUVER, MATCH COLOR TOADJACENT MATERIAL17MAN DOOR, PAINT TO MATCH ADJACENT FINISH18CMU2AMETAL PANEL A, FLAT PANEL (WHITE)3AASPHALT SHINGLES19STONE SILL2CCANOPY20STONE (BEIGE)2BFIBERGLASS WINDOW, SPANDREL GLASS5CFIBERGLASS WINDOW, VISION GLASS5BMECHANICAL SCREEN FENCING217/13/2016 11:33:34 AMMEADOWBROOKCLUBHOUSE6860 Excelsior BoulevardSt. Louis Park, MN 55426ELEVATIONS-NORTH/SOUTH -COLORA3-02 1/8" = 1'-0"1NORTH - ENTITLEMENT - COLOR 1/8" = 1'-0"2SOUTH - ENTITLEMENT - COLORCity Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8f) Title: Meadowbrook Manor – Conditional Use PermitPage 19 L1100' - 0"Roof line110' - 0"Parapet120' - 0"Lower Level88' - 0"3B4A3B2A4A3B3A12B114A19195A5A2C2C2C5B5B5B1L1100' - 0"L2110' - 0"Roof Line120' - 0"Lower Level88' - 0"73B3A19215A2CL1100' - 0"Roof line110' - 0"Parapet120' - 0"Lower Level88' - 0"3B4A3B213A2B2A13A194A4A1172B193A1975A5A2C2C12C2C5B5B5B5BL1100' - 0"L2110' - 0"Roof Line120' - 0"Lower Level88' - 0"3B183B2C2BEXTERIOR ELEVATION KEYNOTESGLAZED BRICK (RED)1METAL PANEL B (BLACK)3BPT-1 (MEDIUM GRAY) HARDIE SIDING4AALUMINUM STOREFRONT5APREFABRICATED RAILING6SUNSHADE7OVERHEAD SECTIONAL DOOR8MECHANICAL UNIT, GRILL COLOR TO MATCHADJACENT BUILDING MATERIAL9LARGE EXTERIOR SCONCE11SMALL EXTERIOR SCONCE12WALL PACK13MECHANICAL LOUVER, MATCH COLOR TOADJACENT MATERIAL17MAN DOOR, PAINT TO MATCH ADJACENT FINISH18CMU2AMETAL PANEL A, FLAT PANEL (WHITE)3AASPHALT SHINGLES19STONE SILL2CCANOPY20STONE (BEIGE)2BFIBERGLASS WINDOW, SPANDREL GLASS5CFIBERGLASS WINDOW, VISION GLASS5BMECHANICAL SCREEN FENCING217/13/2016 10:04:51 AMMEADOWBROOKCLUBHOUSE6860 Excelsior BoulevardSt. Louis Park, MN 55426ELEVATIONS -EAST/WEST -COLORA3-03 1/8" = 1'-0"1EAST WING - ENTITLEMENT - COLOR 1/8" = 1'-0"2WEST WING - ENTITLEMENT - COLORCity Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8f) Title: Meadowbrook Manor – Conditional Use PermitPage 20 L1100' - 0"L2110' - 0"Roof Line120' - 0"8314671855554NORTHOVERALL 1359CLASS 1 MATERIALGLASS 105BRICK 120STUCCO 626.510% HARDIE 136SIDING ALLOWANCECLASS 1 987.5 72.7%L1100' - 0"L2110' - 0"Roof Line120' - 0"8646684L1100' - 0"L2110' - 0"Roof Line120' - 0"4431WESTOVERALL 642CLASS 1 MATERIALGLASS 0BRICK 77.5STUCCO 284.510% HARDIE 64SIDING ALLOWANCECLASS 1 426 66.4%L1100' - 0"L2110' - 0"Roof Line120' - 0"14364EASTOVERALL 641CLASS 1 MATERIALGLASS 35BRICK 77.5STUCCO 34110% HARDIE 64CLASS 1 517.5 80.7%EXTERIOR ELEVATION KEYNOTESGLAZED BRICK (RED)1STUCCO (WHITE)4OVERHEAD SECTIONAL DOOR5MAN DOOR, PAINT TO MATCH ADJACENT FINISH7FIBERCEMENT TRIM BOARD2HARDIE LAP SIDING (LIGHT GRAY)3ASPHALT SHINGLES8FIBERGLAS WINDOW VISION GLASS67/13/2016 11:30:37 AMMEADOWBROOKMAINTENANCE6860 Excelsior BoulevardSt. Louis Park, MN 55426ELEVATIONS -MAINTENANCE -COLORA3-11 1/8" = 1'-0"1MAINTENANCE - SOUTH - ENTITLEMENT -COLOR 1/8" = 1'-0"2MAINTENANCE - NORTH - ENTITLEMENT -COLOR 1/8" = 1'-0"3MAINTENANCE - WEST - ENTITLEMENT -COLOR 1/8" = 1'-0"4MAINTENANCE - EAST - ENTITLEMENT -COLORCity Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8f) Title: Meadowbrook Manor – Conditional Use PermitPage 21 I hereby certify that this plan, specification orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensedprofessional ENGINEER under the laws of the stateof Minnesota.If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of thisplan which is available upon request at Sambatek's,Minnetonka, MN office.Registration No.Date:05/31/201650475Eric T. LuthProjectLocationDateSubmittal / RevisionNo.CertificationSheet TitleSummaryRevision HistorySheet No.RevisionProject No.ByDesigned:Drawn:Approved: Book / Page:Phase: Initial Issue:ClientBIGOSMANAGEMENT8325 WAYZATA BLVD, SUITE 300GOLDEN VALLEY, MNMEADOWBROOKCLUBHOUSEST. LOUIS PARK,MN6922 - 6932 MEADOWBROOK BLVDETLJMWEWMPRELIMINARY05/31/201620555PRELIMINARY06/20/16 JEB CITY COMMENTS07/13/16 JEB WATERSHED PERMIT Jul 13, 2016 - 12:59pm - User:577 L:\PROJECTS\20555\dwg\Civil\Preliminary\20555-C101-TITLE.dwgC1.01TITLE SHEETDEVELOPER/OWNERBIGOS MANAGEMENT8325 WAYZATA BLVDGOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55426TEL 763-367-7402CONTACT: SUMMER KRZOSKAARCHITECTDORAN COMPANIES7803 GLENROY ROAD, SUITE 200BLOOMINGTON, MN 55439TEL 952-288-2045CONTACT: PATRICK MACNABBCIVIL ENGINEERSAMBATEK12800 WHITEWATER DRIVE, SUITE 300MINNETONKA, MN 55343TEL 763-476-6010FAX 763-476-8532CONTACT: ERIC LUTHLANDSCAPINGSAMBATEK12800 WHITEWATER DRIVE, SUITE 300MINNETONKA, MN 55343TEL 763-476-6010FAX 763-476-8532CONTACT: WILLIAM DELANEYSURVEYORSAMBATEK12800 WHITEWATER DRIVE, SUITE 300MINNETONKA, MN 55343TEL 763-476-6010FAX 763-476-8532CONTACT: RICK BLOMSHEET INDEXSHEETDESCRIPTIONC1.01 TITLE SHEETC2.01 EXISTING CONDITIONS - SELECTIVE SITE DEMOC2.02 GENERAL EXCAVATION PLANC3.01 SITE PLANC4.01 GRADING PLANC5.01 EROSION CONTROL PHASE IC5.02 EROSION CONTROL PHASE IIC5.03 EROSION CONTROL DETAILSC5.04 SWPPP NARRATIVEC5.05 SWPPP NARRATIVEC6.01UTILITY PLANL1.01 LANDSCAPE PLANL2.01 DETAILSPROPERTY SURVEY BY ACRE LAND SURVEYING (03/03/2016)LIGHTING PLANforPreliminary Site Development PlansMeadowbrook ClubhouseBigos ManagementSt. Louis Park, MinnesotaPresented by:NO SCALEVICINITY MAPSITECONSULTANT CONTACT LIST:City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8f) Title: Meadowbrook Manor – Conditional Use PermitPage 22 SCALE IN FEET06030I hereby certify that this plan, specification orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensedprofessional ENGINEER under the laws of the stateof Minnesota.If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of thisplan which is available upon request at Sambatek's,Minnetonka, MN office.Registration No.Date:05/31/201650475Eric T. LuthProjectLocationDateSubmittal / RevisionNo.CertificationSheet TitleSummaryRevision HistorySheet No.RevisionProject No.ByDesigned:Drawn:Approved: Book / Page:Phase: Initial Issue:ClientBIGOSMANAGEMENT8325 WAYZATA BLVD, SUITE 300GOLDEN VALLEY, MNMEADOWBROOKCLUBHOUSEST. LOUIS PARK,MN6922 - 6932 MEADOWBROOK BLVDETLJMWEWMPRELIMINARY05/31/201620555PRELIMINARY06/20/16 JEB CITY COMMENTS07/13/16 JEB WATERSHED PERMITLEGEND Jul 13, 2016 - 1:00pm - User:577 L:\PROJECTS\20555\dwg\Civil\Preliminary\20555-C201-EXCND.dwgC2.01EXISTINGCONDITIONS -SELECTIVE SITEDEMO1. SUBJECT PROPERTIES ADDRESS IS 3800 EXCELSIOR BLVD., ST. LOUIS PARK, MN, ITS PROPERTYIDENTIFICATION NUMBER IS 2011721420001, THE GROSS AREA OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS 4.55ACRES OR 198,052 SQUARE FEET & 6841 MEADOWBROOK BLVD., ST. LOUIS PARK, MN, ITS PROPERTYIDENTIFICATION NUMBER IS 2011721130003, THE GROSS AREA OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS 4.18ACRES OR 182,000 SQUARE FEET & 6800 MEADOWBROOK BLVD., ST. LOUIS PARK, MN, ITS PROPERTYIDENTIFICATION NUMBER IS 2011721130004, THE GROSS AREA OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS 6.64ACRES OR 289,058 SQUARE FEET & 7000 EXCELSIOR BLVD., ST. LOUIS PARK, MN, ITS PROPERTYIDENTIFICATION NUMBER IS 2011721130005, THE GROSS AREA OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS 10.58ACRES OR 460,767SQUARE FEET.2. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS ZONED R-4.3. THE BUILDING(S) AND EXTERIOR DIMENSIONS OF THE OUTSIDE WALL AT GROUND LEVEL ARE SHOWNON THE SURVEY. IT MAY NOT BE THE FOUNDATION WALL.PART OF LOTS 1, 2, 3 AND 4, MEADOWBROOK MANOR,HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA.1. BASIS FOR BEARINGS: (HENNEPIN COUNTY COORDINATE SYSTEM) - NAD83 (1996) (VIA REAL TIME GPSMEASUREMENTS UTILIZING MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION VRS NETWORK).2. THE BACKGROUND INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED BY ACRE LAND SURVEYING (763-458-2997) DATED03/03/2016.FOUND MONUMENTSET MONUMENTMARKED LS 47481ELECTRIC METERLIGHTSANITARY SEWERSTORM SEWERWATERMAINFLARED END SECTIONELECTRIC TRANSFORMERAIR CONDITIONERGUY ANCHORHANDICAP STALLUTILITY POLEPOSTSIGNTELEPHONE PEDESTALGAS METEREASEMENT LINESETBACK LINERESTRICTED ACCESSBUILDING LINEBUILDING CANOPYCONCRETE CURBBITUMINOUS SURFACECONCRETE SURFACELANDSCAPE SURFACEDECIDUOUS TREECONIFEROUS TREEOVERHEAD WIRECHAIN LINK FENCEIRON FENCEWIRE FENCEWOOD FENCE1. STATION "MEADOW", NORTHING: 149438.987, EASTING 502823.179, ELEV. = 899.14 (NAVD 88) - PERHENNEPIN COUNTY SURVEYORS OFFICEDESCRIPTIONPROPERTY SUMMARYBENCHMARKSDEMOLITION NOTES1. DEMOLITION NOTES ARE NOT COMPREHENSIVE. CONTRACTOR SHALL VISITTHE SITE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION TO OBTAIN A CLEAR UNDERSTANDING OFTHE INTENDED SCOPE OF WORK.2. THE DESIGN SHOWN IS BASED ON ENGINEER'S UNDERSTANDING OF EXISTINGCONDITIONS. THE EXISTING CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE BASEDUPON ALTA AND TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING PREPARED BY ACRE LANDSURVEYING (763-458-2997) DATED 03/03/16. IF CONTRACTOR DOES NOTACCEPT EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS WITHOUTEXCEPTION, CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE MADE, AT OWN EXPENSE, ATOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR AND SUBMIT IT TOTHE OWNER FOR REVIEW.3. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DEMOLITION, REMOVAL, ANDDISPOSING IN A LOCATION APPROVED BY ALL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES ANDIN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE CODES, OF ALL STRUCTURES, PADS, WALLS,FLUMES, FOUNDATIONS, PARKING, DRIVES, DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, UTILITIES,ETC., SUCH THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS CAN BECONSTRUCTED. ALL FACILITIES TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE UNDERCUT TOSUITABLE MATERIAL AND BROUGHT TO GRADE WITH SUITABLE COMPACTEDFILL MATERIAL PER THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT AND/OR GEOTECHNICALENGINEER.4. CLEARING AND GRUBBING: CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING ALLDEBRIS FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSING THE DEBRIS IN A LAWFUL MANNER.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL PERMITS REQUIRED FORDEMOLITION AND DISPOSAL.6. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DISCONNECTION OF UTILITY SERVICESTO EXISTING BUILDINGS PRIOR TO DEMOLITION OF THE BUILDINGS.7. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANIESPRIOR TO REMOVAL AND/OR RELOCATION OF UTILITIES. CONTRACTOR SHALLCOORDINATE WITH UTILITY COMPANIES CONCERNING PORTIONS OF WORKWHICH MAY BE PERFORMED BY THE UTILITY COMPANIES' FORCES AND ANYFEES WHICH ARE TO BE PAID TO UTILITY COMPANIES FOR SERVICES.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PAYING ALL FEES AND CHARGES.8. CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT LOCATIONS OF EXISTINGUTILITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN HAVE BEEN DETERMINED FROMINFORMATION AVAILABLE. ENGINEER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEUTILITY MAPPING ACCURACY. PRIOR TO START OF ANY DEMOLITION ACTIVITY,THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY UTILITY COMPANIES 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANYEXCAVATION FOR ON-SITE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES. THE LOCATIONSOF UTILITIES SHALL BE OBTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR BY CALLINGMINNESOTA GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 800-252-1166 OR 651-454-0002.9. THE MAPPING LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING SEWERS, PIPING, AND UTILITIESSHOWN ARE NOT TO BE INTERPRETED AS THE EXACT LOCATION, OR AS THEONLY OBSTACLES THAT MAY OCCUR ON THE SITE. VERIFY EXISTINGCONDITIONS AND PROCEED WITH CAUTION AROUND ANY ANTICIPATEDFEATURES. GIVE NOTICE TO ALL UTILITY COMPANIES REGARDINGDESTRUCTION AND REMOVAL OF ALL SERVICE LINES AND CAP ALL LINESBEFORE PROCEEDING WITH WORK. UTILITIES DETERMINED TO BEABANDONED SHALL BE REMOVED IF UNDER THE BUILDING INCLUDING 10'BEYOND FOUNDATIONS.10. ELECTRICAL, TELEPHONE, CABLE, WATER, FIBER OPTIC CABLE AND/OR GASLINES NEEDING TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED SHALL BE COORDINATEDWITH THE AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANY. ADEQUATE TIME SHALL BE PROVIDEDFOR RELOCATION AND CLOSE COORDINATION WITH THE UTILITY COMPANY ISNECESSARY TO PROVIDE A SMOOTH TRANSITION IN UTILITY SERVICE.CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY CLOSE ATTENTION TO EXISTING UTILITIES WITHINTHE ROAD RIGHT OF WAY DURING CONSTRUCTION.11. CONTRACTOR MUST PROTECT THE PUBLIC AT ALL TIMES WITH FENCING,BARRICADES, ENCLOSURES, ETC., TO THE BEST PRACTICES.12. CONTINUOUS ACCESS SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR THE SURROUNDINGPROPERTIES AT ALL TIMES DURING DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING FACILITIES.13. PRIOR TO DEMOLITION OCCURRING, ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES ARE TOBE INSTALLED AND APPROVED BY THE LOCAL AUTHORITY.14. CONTRACTOR SHALL LIMIT SAW-CUT & PAVEMENT REMOVAL TO ONLY THOSEAREAS WHERE IT IS REQUIRED AS SHOWN ON THESE CONSTRUCTION PLANSBUT IF ANY DAMAGE IS INCURRED ON ANY OF THE SURROUNDING PAVEMENT,ETC. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ITS REMOVAL AND REPAIR.15. CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT EXISTING FEATURES WHICH ARE TO REMAIN.DAMAGE TO ANY EXISTING CONDITIONS TO REMAIN WILL BE REPLACED ATCONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE.16. ABANDON OR REMOVE ALL SANITARY, WATER AND STORM SERVICES PER CITYSTANDARDS. COORDINATE ALL WORK WITH CITY. ALL STREET RESTORATIONSHALL BE COMPLETED IN COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL STANDARDS.17. CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE AND SUBMIT TO THE GOVERNING AUTHORITY ATRAFFIC AND/OR PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC PLAN PER CITY/COUNTY/STATESTANDARDS TO BE APPROVED BY THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITY.REMOVE EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCEREMOVE EXISTING UTILITYREMOVE EXISTINGREMOVE EXISTING TREEREMOVE EXISTING BUILDINGREMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENTREMOVE EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTSAW CUT EXIST BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTREMOVE EXIST CONCRETE CURBREMOVE EXISTING UTILITY LINEREMOVE EXISTING LIGHT FIXTUREREMOVE EXISTING LANDSCAPINGTHE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL XX. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINEDACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTINGSUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTINGUTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THECONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BYHIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD).IF THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TILE WITHIN THE SITE, HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER WITH THE LOCATION, SIZE,INVERT AND IF THE TILE LINE IS ACTIVE. NO DRAIN TILE SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ENGINEER.IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSEDIMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.SURVEY NOTESLIMITS OF DISTURBANCECity Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8f) Title: Meadowbrook Manor – Conditional Use PermitPage 23 SCALE IN FEET016080I hereby certify that this plan, specification orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensedprofessional ENGINEER under the laws of the stateof Minnesota.If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of thisplan which is available upon request at Sambatek's,Minnetonka, MN office.Registration No.Date:05/31/201650475Eric T. LuthProjectLocationDateSubmittal / RevisionNo.CertificationSheet TitleSummaryRevision HistorySheet No.RevisionProject No.ByDesigned:Drawn:Approved: Book / Page:Phase: Initial Issue:ClientBIGOSMANAGEMENT8325 WAYZATA BLVD, SUITE 300GOLDEN VALLEY, MNMEADOWBROOKCLUBHOUSEST. LOUIS PARK,MN6922 - 6932 MEADOWBROOK BLVDETLJMWEWMPRELIMINARY05/31/201620555PRELIMINARY06/20/16 JEB CITY COMMENTS07/13/16 JEB WATERSHED PERMITLEGEND Jul 13, 2016 - 1:00pm - User:577 L:\PROJECTS\20555\dwg\Civil\Preliminary\20555-C202-GENERAL.dwgC2.02GENERALEXCAVATIONPLANCURB & GUTTERBUILDINGRETAINING WALLPROPERTY LIMITEXISTINGPROPOSEDWETLAND LIMITSTREELINESTORM SEWERDRAINTILED1.PROJECT ACCESS NOTES1.1.CONTRACTOR MUST ADHERE TO THE DESIGNATED TRUCKING ROUTES AS SHOWN IN THE ABOVEPLANS AT ALL TIMES.2.CONSTRUCTION STAGING NOTES2.1. STAGING AREAS MUST BE DELINEATED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. SEE ABOVE PLANS FORLOCATIONS OF CONSTRUCTION STAGING AREAS.2.2. STOCKPILES SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM EROSION.3.FILL3.1. THE PROPOSED SITE WILL REQUIRE FILL MATERIAL TO BE IMPORTED FROM OFFSITE. THEPROPOSED BUILDINGS WILL REQUIRE SELECT GRANULAR BORROW AND CLASS 5 AGGREGATEBASE TO PROVIDE SUITABLE CONDITIONS FOR BUILDING FOOTINGS AND FOUNDATIONS. SELECTGRANULAR BORROW AND CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE WILL ALSO BE REQUIRED TO FILLUNDERNEATH ALL PROPOSED PAVEMENT SURFACES ON THE SITE. EXCESS EXISTING SOILSONSITE CAN BE USED TO PLACE OTHER MISCELLANEOUS FILL. SEE GRADING PLAN SHEET C4.01FOR FINAL ELEVATIONS.4.EXCAVATION4.1. EXCESS MATERIAL ONSITE WILL NEED TO BE HAULED OFF AND DISPOSED OFF IN ACCORDANCEWITH MNDOT STANDARDS.4.2. THE PROPOSED SITE WILL REQUIRE APPROXIMATELY 5000 CUBIC YARDS OF EXCAVATION. SEEGRADING PLAN SHEET C4.01 FOR FINAL ELEVATIONS.5. EQUIPMENT5.1. SITE WILL BE PREPARED THROUGH THE USE OF STANDARD CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT.EQUIPMENT MAY INCLUDE BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO A BACKHOE, DOZER, SHEEPSFOOT, ANDHAULING TRUCKS.6. CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS6.1. STANDARD CONSTRUCTION HOURS SHALL APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. HOURS ARE 7AM-7PMMONDAY-FRIDAY AND 9AM-5PM ON SATURDAY & HOLIDAYS.6.2. THE ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION TIMELINE FOR THIS PROJECT IS SEPTEMBER 2016 TO MARCH2016. AN ESTIMATED 9 TRUCK TRIPS WILL BE REQUIRED PER DAY FOR THE FIRST 60 DAYS OF SITEWORK. THE SITE WILL REQUIRE AN ESTIMATED 600 TRUCK TRIPS RELATED TO SITE WORK.7.SITE MAINTENANCE7.1. CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT EXISTING ACCESS ROADS TO THE PROJECT SITE. ACCESS ROADSSHALL BE IN A CONDITION THAT ALLOWS ENTRANCE TO THE SITE BY OWNER, INSPECTORS, ANDAGENCIES AT ALL TIMES. CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE MEASURES AS NECESSARY TO SECURE THEPROJECT SITE FROM PUBLIC ACCESS.7.2. CONTRACTOR NOT TO USE OR OBSTRUCT ANY PUBLIC OR PRIVATE ROADWAY OR DRIVEWAYWITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN APPROVAL. ANY AND ALL DAMAGE TO SUCH ROADS OR DRIVEWAYSAS A RESULT OF CONTRACTOR ACTIVITIES AND OPERATIONS SHALL BE REPAIRED, AT THECONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE, TO SATISFACTION OF PROPERTY OWNER.7.3. CONTRACTOR SHALL PARK VEHICLES, EQUIPMENT, AND STORE MATERIALS WITHIN THE STAGINGAREAS DESIGNATED IN THE DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR TO IMPROVE, MAINTAIN, AND DEVELOPSTAGING AREAS AS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE WORK.7.4. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS NECESSARY FOR THE CONTROL OFDUST ARISING DURING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK.7.5. EMERGENCY FIRE ACCESS MUST BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES THROUGHOUT THE LIFE OF THEPROJECT.GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTESLIMITS OF DISTURBANCEDESIGNATEDTRUCK ROUTESTAGING AREA08/09/16 ETL CITY COUNCIL REVIEWCity Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8f) Title: Meadowbrook Manor – Conditional Use PermitPage 24 SCALE IN FEET06030I hereby certify that this plan, specification orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensedprofessional ENGINEER under the laws of the stateof Minnesota.If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of thisplan which is available upon request at Sambatek's,Minnetonka, MN office.Registration No.Date:05/31/201650475Eric T. LuthProjectLocationDateSubmittal / RevisionNo.CertificationSheet TitleSummaryRevision HistorySheet No.RevisionProject No.ByDesigned:Drawn:Approved: Book / Page:Phase: Initial Issue:ClientBIGOSMANAGEMENT8325 WAYZATA BLVD, SUITE 300GOLDEN VALLEY, MNMEADOWBROOKCLUBHOUSEST. LOUIS PARK,MN6922 - 6932 MEADOWBROOK BLVDETLJMWEWMPRELIMINARY05/31/201620555PRELIMINARY06/20/16 JEB CITY COMMENTS07/13/16 JEB WATERSHED PERMITAREAPROJECT AREA (DISTURBED AREA)EXISTING IMPERVIOUSPROPOSED IMPERVIOUSPARKING STALLSCLUBHOUSEMAINTENANCE SHEDSETBACKSFRONT YARDREAR YARDSIDE YARDMINIMUM LOT SIZEZONINGEXISTING ZONINGBUILDING REQUIREMENTSMAXIMUM FLOOR AREA RATIOMAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT.2. ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.3.CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT “GUTTER OUT” WHERE WATERDRAINS AWAY FROM CURB. ALL OTHER AREAS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS “GUTTER IN” CURB.COORDINATE WITH GRADING CONTRACTOR.4.ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT.5. ALL PARKING STALLS TO BE 9' IN WIDTH AND 18' IN LENGTH UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED.6.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OFEXIT PORCHES, RAMPS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCELOCATIONS.7.SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR LIGHT POLE FOUNDATION DETAIL AND FOR EXACT LOCATIONS OF LIGHTPOLE.8. REFER TO FINAL PLAT FOR LOT BOUNDARIES, LOT NUMBERS, LOT AREAS, AND LOT DIMENSIONS.9. ALL GRADIENTS ON SIDEWALKS ALONG THE ADA ROUTE SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM LONGITUDINAL SLOPEOF 5% (1:20), EXCEPT AT CURB RAMPS (1:12), AND A MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE OF 2.08% (1:48). THEMAXIMUM SLOPE IN ANY DIRECTION ON AN ADA PARKING STALL OR ACCESS ISLE SHALL BE 2.08% (1:48).THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW AND VERIFY THE GRADIENT IN THE FIELD ALONG THE ADA ROUTESPRIOR TO PLACING CONCRETE OR BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THEENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF THERE IS A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE GRADIENT IN THE FIELD VERSUS THEDESIGN GRADIENT AND COORDINATE WITH GRADING CONTRACTOR.LEGENDEASEMENTCURB & GUTTERBUILDINGRETAINING WALLSAWCUT LINENUMBER OF PARKINGSTALLS PER ROWSIGNPIPE BOLLARDSTANDARD DUTYASPHALT PAVINGHEAVY DUTYASPHALT PAVINGCONCRETE PAVINGPROPERTY LIMITEXISTINGPROPOSEDKEY NOTEDEVELOPMENT SUMMARYDEVELOPMENT NOTESKEY NOTESWETLAND LIMITSTREELINEA. BUILDING, STOOPS, STAIRS SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS.B. B-612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER.C. B-618 6CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER.D. CONCRETE APRONE. FLAT CURB SECTION.F. SEGMENTAL BLOCK RETAINING WALLG. ACCESSIBLE RAMP.H. STEPSI. BICYCLE PARKINGJ. MECHANICAL UNIT SCREENING75,616 SF 1.74 AC18,270 SF 0.42 AC35,607 SF 0.82 ACEXISTINGPROPOSED0109 430 FEET 25 FEET 15 FEET 8,000 SF R-4 MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE 0.7 40 FT Jul 13, 2016 - 1:01pm - User:577 L:\PROJECTS\20555\dwg\Civil\Preliminary\20555-C301-SITE.dwgC3.01SITE PLANLIMITS OF DISTURBANCECity Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8f) Title: Meadowbrook Manor – Conditional Use PermitPage 25 SCALE IN FEET06030I hereby certify that this plan, specification orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensedprofessional ENGINEER under the laws of the stateof Minnesota.If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of thisplan which is available upon request at Sambatek's,Minnetonka, MN office.Registration No.Date:05/31/201650475Eric T. LuthProjectLocationDateSubmittal / RevisionNo.CertificationSheet TitleSummaryRevision HistorySheet No.RevisionProject No.ByDesigned:Drawn:Approved: Book / Page:Phase: Initial Issue:ClientBIGOSMANAGEMENT8325 WAYZATA BLVD, SUITE 300GOLDEN VALLEY, MNMEADOWBROOKCLUBHOUSEST. LOUIS PARK,MN6922 - 6932 MEADOWBROOK BLVDETLJMWEWMPRELIMINARY05/31/201620555PRELIMINARY06/20/16 JEB CITY COMMENTS07/13/16 JEB WATERSHED PERMITLEGEND Jul 13, 2016 - 1:01pm - User:577 L:\PROJECTS\20555\dwg\Civil\Preliminary\20555-C401-GRADE.dwgC4.01GRADING PLAN1. PROPOSED CONTOURS ARE TO FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION. SPOT ELEVATIONS ALONG PROPOSED CURB DENOTE GUTTER GRADE.2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT “GUTTER OUT” WHERE WATER DRAINS AWAY FROM CURB. ALL OTHER AREASSHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS “GUTTER IN” CURB.3. ALL GRADIENT ON SIDEWALKS ALONG THE ADA ROUTE SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM LONGITUDINAL SLOPE OF 5% (1:20), EXCEPT AT CURB RAMPS(1:12), AND A MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE OF 2.08% (1:48). MAXIMUM SLOPE IN ANY DIRECTION ON AN ADA PARKING STALL OR ACCESS AISLE SHALLBE IN 2.08% (1:48). CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW AND VERIFY THE GRADIENT IN THE FIELD ALONG THE ADA ROUTES PRIOR TO PLACING CONCRETEOR BITUMINOUS. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF THERE IS A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE GRADIENT IN THE FIELDVERSUS THE DESIGN GRADIENT. COORDINATE ALL WORK WITH PAVING CONTRACTOR.4. CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING THE CONSTRUCTIONPHASES OF THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR WILL BE HELD SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES OCCURRINGDURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT.5. SAFETY NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS: IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERALLY ACCEPTED CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES, CONTRACTOR WILL BE SOLELY ANDCOMPLETELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE, INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY DURING PERFORMANCE OF THEWORK. THIS REQUIREMENT WILL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS. THE DUTY OF THE ENGINEER OR THEDEVELOPER TO CONDUCT CONSTRUCTION REVIEW OF THE CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE IS NOT INTENDED TO INCLUDE REVIEW OF THEADEQUACY OF THE CONTRACTOR'S SAFETY MEASURES IN, ON OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION SITE.6. CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE SITE GRADING CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER.ALL SOIL TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALLREQUIRED SOIL TESTS AND INSPECTIONS WITH THE SOILS ENGINEER.A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SOILS REPORT HAS BEEN COMPLETED BY:COMPANY: ADDRESS: PHONE: DATED: CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE SOILS REPORT.7. CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE DEWATERING AS REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THE SITE GRADING CONSTRUCTION.8. PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE AGGREGATE BASE, A TEST ROLL SHALL BE PERFORMED ON THE STREET AND PARKING AREA SUBGRADE. CONTRACTORSHALL PROVIDE A LOADED TANDEM AXLE TRUCK WITH A GROSS WEIGHT OF 25 TONS. THE TEST ROLLING SHALL BE AT THE DIRECTION OF THE SOILSENGINEER AND SHALL BE COMPLETED IN AREAS AS DIRECTED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. CORRECTION OF THE SUBGRADE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETEDIN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOILS ENGINEER.9. REPLACE ALL SUBGRADE SOIL DISTURBED DURING THE CONSTRUCTION THAT HAVE BECOME UNSUITABLE AND WILL NOT PASS A TEST ROLL.REMOVE UNSUITABLE SOIL FROM THE SITE AND IMPORT SUITABLE SOIL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER.10. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH ASBARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGMEN AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. TRAFFICCONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARDS.11. EXISTING TREES AND OTHER NATURAL VEGETATION WITHIN THE PROJECT AND/OR ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT ARE OF PRIME CONCERN TO THECONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS AND SHALL BE A RESTRICTED AREA. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT TREES TO REMAIN AT ALL TIMES. EQUIPMENT SHALLNOT NEEDLESSLY BE OPERATED UNDER NEARBY TREES AND EXTREME CAUTION SHALL BE EXERCISED WHEN WORKING ADJACENT TO TREES. SHOULDANY PORTION OF THE TREE BRANCHES REQUIRE REMOVAL TO PERMIT OPERATION OF THE CONTRACTOR'S EQUIPMENT, CONTRACTOR SHALLOBTAIN THE SERVICES OF A PROFESSIONAL TREE TRIMMING SERVICE TO TRIM THE TREES PRIOR TO THE BEGINNING OF OPERATION. SHOULDCONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS RESULT IN THE BREAKING OF ANY LIMBS, THE BROKEN LIMBS SHOULD BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY AND CUTS SHALL BEPROPERLY PROTECTED TO MINIMIZE ANY LASTING DAMAGE TO THE TREE. NO TREES SHALL BE REMOVED WITHOUT AUTHORIZATION BY THEENGINEER. COSTS FOR TRIMMING SERVICES SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONSTRUCTION AND NO SPECIAL PAYMENT WILLBE MADE.12. EXCAVATE TOPSOIL FROM AREAS TO BE FURTHER EXCAVATED OR REGRADED AND STOCKPILE IN AREAS DESIGNATED ON THE SITE. CONTRACTORSHALL SALVAGE ENOUGH TOPSOIL FOR RESPREADING ON THE SITE AS SPECIFIED. EXCESS TOPSOIL SHALL BE PLACED IN EMBANKMENT AREAS,OUTSIDE OF BUILDING PADS, ROADWAYS AND PARKING AREAS. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBCUT CUT AREAS, WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED, TO ADEPTH OF 6 INCHES. RESPREAD TOPSOIL IN AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 6 INCHES.13. FINISHED GRADING SHALL BE COMPLETED, CONTRACTOR SHALL UNIFORMLY GRADE AREAS WITHIN LIMITS OF GRADING, INCLUDING ADJACENTTRANSITION AREAS. PROVIDE A SMOOTH FINISHED SURFACE WITHIN SPECIFIED TOLERANCES, WITH UNIFORM LEVELS OR SLOPES BETWEEN POINTSWHERE ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN, OR BETWEEN SUCH POINTS AND EXISTING GRADES. AREAS THAT HAVE BEEN FINISHED GRADED SHALL BEPROTECTED FROM SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS, TRAFFIC AND EROSION. REPAIR ALL AREAS THAT HAVE BECOME RUTTED, ERODEDOR HAS SETTLED BELOW THE CORRECT GRADE. ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS SHALL BE RESTORED TO EQUAL ORBETTER THAN ORIGINAL CONDITION OR TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NEW WORK.14. TOLERANCES14.a. THE COMMERCIAL BUILDING SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.10 FOOT ABOVE, OR 0.10 FOOTBELOW, THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION AT ANY POINT WHERE MEASUREMENT IS MADE.14.b. THE STREET OR PARKING AREA SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.05 FOOT ABOVE, OR 0.10 FOOTBELOW, THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION OF ANY POINT WHERE MEASUREMENT IS MADE.14.c. AREAS WHICH ARE TO RECEIVE TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO WITHIN 0.30 FOOT ABOVE OR BELOW THE REQUIRED ELEVATION, UNLESSDIRECTED OTHERWISE BY THE ENGINEER.14.d. TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO PLUS OR MINUS 1/2 INCH OF THE SPECIFIED THICKNESS.15. AFTER THE SITE GRADING IS COMPLETED, IF EXCESS OR SHORTAGE OF SOIL MATERIAL EXISTS, CONTRACTOR SHALL TRANSPORT ALL EXCESS SOILMATERIAL OFF THE SITE TO AN AREA SELECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR, OR IMPORT SUITABLE MATERIAL TO THE SITE.16. CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE LOCATION OF ANY HAUL ROADS THAT MAY BE REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THE SITE GRADING CONSTRUCTIONAND SHALL INDICATE HAUL ROADS ON EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL “SITE MAP”. CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OFTHE GOVERNING AUTHORITY OF EACH ROADWAY. CONTRACTOR SHALL POST WHATEVER SECURITY, AND COMPLY WITH ALL CONDITIONS WHICHARE REQUIRED BY EACH GOVERNING AUTHORITY OF EACH ROADWAY.17. RETAINING WALL(S) SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF MODULAR BLOCK MATERIAL. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT TO THE ENGINEER AND LOCALAUTHORITY CERTIFIED ENGINEERING DRAWINGS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND SOIL BORINGS. THE CERTIFIED ENGINEER FOR THE RETAININGWALL(S) SHALL PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATIONS OF THE RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENT, AND A LETTER CERTIFYING THE INSTALLATIONOF THE WALL(S) WAS CONSTRUCTED IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS.902.5X902SPOT ELEVATIONCONTOURRIP RAPOVERFLOW ELEV.CURB & GUTTERBUILDINGRETAINING WALLPROPERTY LIMITEXISTINGPROPOSEDWETLAND LIMITSTREELINESTORM SEWERSOIL BORINGSGRADING NOTESDRAINTILEEOF902.5D1.INFILTRATION BASIN CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS:(INCLUDES ALL DEVICES USING FILTRATION THROUGH A SOIL MEDIUM TO CAPTURE STORM WATER RUNOFFBUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO: INFILTRATION BASINS, INFILTRATION TRENCHES, BIOFILTRATION BASINS,RAINWATER GARDENS, SAND FILTERS, ORGANIC FILTERS, BIORETENTION AREAS, ENHANCED SWALES, DRYSTORAGE PONDS WITH UNDERDRAIN DISCHARGE, AND NATURAL DEPRESSIONS (IF USED TO PROVIDESTORMWATER TREATMENT OF NEW IMPERIOUS SURFACE))1.a. THE INFILTRATION BASIN SHALL BE EXCAVATED TO NO LOWER THAN 2.0 FEET ABOVE FINISHEDGRADE DURING CONSTRUCTION WITH THE EXCEPTION OF INSTALLING THE INLET FLARED ENDSECTION (IF APPLICABLE). ONCE STREET AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION CEASES AND “FINALSTABILIZATION” (AS DEFINED ACCORDING TO MNR1000001 CONSTRUCTION STORM WATER PERMITSECTION IV.G) OF CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEEN COMPLETED, AND ONLY AFTER THEOWNER'S ENGINEER AUTHORIZES CONTRACTOR TO PROCEED, INFILTRATION BASIN SHALL BEEXCAVATED TO FINISHED GRADE.1.b. HEAVY EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT TRAVEL WITHIN THE INFILTRATION BASIN AREA. EXCAVATIONWITHIN THE INFILTRATION BASIN SHALL BE PERFORMED BY USE OF A BACKHOE BUCKET WITH TEETH.CONTRACTOR SHALL DISC OR TILL THE SOILS IF REQUIRED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER.1.c. INFILTRATION BASIN SHALL BE PROTECTED BY SILT FENCE DURING ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.ALL DEPOSITED SEDIMENT DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SHALL BE PROPERLY DISPOSED OFDOWNSTREAM OF INFILTRATION BASIN, IF POSSIBLE.1.d. ALL FLARED END SECTION INLETS AND CATCH BASIN MANHOLE INLETS SHALL HAVE INLET EROSIONCONTROL PROTECTION IN PLACE UNTIL FINAL STABILIZATION BASIN HAS OCCURRED.1.e. ABOVE THE INFILTRATION BASIN OUTLET ELEVATION, INCLUDING THE BERM AND DISTURBED AREAS,A MINIMUM OF 4" DEPTH OF TOPSOIL MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED TO THE FINISHED GRADEELEVATION. TOPSOIL SHALL MEET (MN/DOT) SPECIFICATION. THE AREA SHALL BE SEEDED WITH MNSTATE SEED MIXTURE 25-131 (LOW MAINTENANCE TURF) APPLIED AT A RATE OF 220 LBS/ACRE, ORMN STATE SEED MIXTURE 35-241 (MESIC PRAIRIE GENERAL) APPLIED AT A RATE OF 36.5 LBS/ACRE.SOD MEETING (MN/DOT) SPECIFICATION 3878.2-B CAN BE SUBSTITUTED FOR SEED.SEED APPLICATION PROCEDURE:MIXTURE APPLICATION PROCEDURES SHALL FOLLOW (MN/DOT) SPECIFICATION 2575.3. SEED SHALLBE SECURED BY USE OF (MN/DOT) SPECIFICATION 3885 CATEGORY 1 EROSION BLANKET.ABSENT A SOIL TEST, FERTILIZER MEETING ANALYSIS 22-5-10 (NPK) 80% W.I.N. SHALL BE APPLIED ATA RATE OF 350 LBS/ACRE FOR SEED MIXTURE 25-131, OR FERTILIZER WITH AN ANALYSIS OF 18-1-8(NPK) (FOR LOAMS, CLAY LOAM SOIL), OR 17-10-7 (NPK) (FOR SANDS WITH LESS THAN 30% ORGANICAND CLAY MATTER) NATURAL BASE SHALL BE APPLIED AT A RATE OF 150 LBS/ACRE FOR SEEDMIXTURE 35-241.1.f. BELOW THE INFILTRATION BASIN OUTLET, INCLUDING BASIN FLOOR, PLACE PLANTING MEDIUM SOILBASED ON - SITE SOIL CONDITIONS, AND ALSO BASED ON LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, WATERSHED,AND/OR CITY RECOMMENDATIONS (SEE DETAIL ON PLAN). DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SEEDED WITHMN STATE SEED MIXTURE 33-261 (STORMWATER SOUTH AND WEST) APPLIED AT A RATE OF 35LBS/ACRE. DRAINTILE INSTALLATION (IF REQUIRED) SHALL BE INSTALLED CONCURRENTLY WITHFLOOR CONSTRUCTION.NOTE: INFILTRATION BASIN FLOOR EXCAVATING, PLANTING MEDIUM SOIL PLACEMENT, DRAINTILEINSTALLATION, ETC. SHALL TAKE PLACE ONLY AFTER THE OWNER'S ENGINEER AUTHORIZESCONTRACTOR TO PROCEED AND AFTER INFILTRATION BASIN SIDESLOPES (ABOVE OUTLET ELEVATION)HAVE UNDERGONE “FINAL STABILIZATION” WHICH INCLUDES FLUSHING OUT ACCUMULATED SILTAND SEDIMENT FROM CONTRIBUTING STORM SEWER. EXCAVATED BASIN MATERIAL SHALL BEDISPOSED OF DOWNSTREAM OF BASIN AREA, IF POSSIBLE, OR OFF-SITE.SEED APPLICATION PROCEDURE:MIXTURE APPLICATION PROCEDURES SHALL FOLLOW (MN/DOT) SPECIFICATION 2575.3. SEED SHALLBE SECURED BY USE OF HYDRO MULCH, OR SECURED BY (MN/DOT) SPECIFICATION 3885 CATEGORY 1OR CATEGORY 3 EROSION BLANKET. ABSENT A SOIL TEST, FERTILIZER WITH AN ANALYSIS OF 18-1-8(NPK) (FOR LOAMS, CLAY LOAM SOIL), OR 17-10-7 (NPK) (FOR SANDS WITH LESS THAN 30% ORGANICAND CLAY MATTER), NATURAL BASE SHALL BE APPLIED AT A RATE OF 120 LBS/ACRE.1.g. CONTRACTOR SHALL RESEED OR REPLANT ANY AREAS ON WHICH THE ORIGINAL SEED HAS FAILED TOGERMINATE AS DIRECTED BY THE OWNER'S ENGINEER.1.h. IF ALTERNATIVE METHODS OF INFILTRATION BASIN CONSTRUCTION ARE PROPOSED BY THECONTRACTOR, THOSE ALTERNATIVE METHODS WILL REQUIRE WRITTEN APPROVAL BY THE OWNER'SENGINEER.1.i. COSTS FOR REMOBILIZATION (IF REQUIRED) TO COMPLETE INFILTRATION BASIN CONSTRUCTION WILLBE CONDUCTED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE.2.PERFORMANCE TESTING OF INFILTRATION BASINS:(TO BE CONDUCTED IF DESIGN INFILTRATION RATE WAS VERIFIED ACCORDING TO ASTM D-3385-03"STANDARD TEST METHOD FOR INFILTRATION RATE OF SOILS IN FIELD USING DOUBLE-RINGINFILTROMETER".)ALL COSTS RELATED TO THE PERFORMANCE INFILTRATION TESTING SHALL BE PAID BY THE OWNER, EXCEPTAS NOTED. THE INFILTRATION BASINS WILL BE TESTED IN ACCORDANCE TO THE FOLLOWING PROCEDURE:2.a. A MINIMUM OF TWO INFILTRATION TESTS SHALL BE COMPLETED FOR EACH INFILTRATION BASIN (0.5ACRE FLOOR AREA OR LESS). THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF TESTS SHALL BE VERIFIED WITH THE SOILSENGINEER AND THE GOVERNING AUTHORITIES.2.b. TWO ADDITIONAL TESTS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR EACH 0.5 ACRE OF INFILTRATION BASIN FLOORAREA.2.c. TEST PROCEDURE WILL FOLLOW ASTM D-3385-09 "STANDARD TEST METHOD FOR INFILTRATION RATEOF SOILS IN FIELD USING DOUBLE-RING INFILTROMETER".2.d. TEST WILL BE CONDUCTED AT THE FINISHED BASIN FLOOR ELEVATION.2.e. TEST WILL BE FOR A PERIOD AS OUTLINED IN ASTM D-3385-09.2.f. THE TEST RESULTS WILL BE AVERAGED TO OBTAIN THE INFILTRATION RATE USED FOR ACCEPTANCE.2.g. THE LOWEST MEASURED INFILTRATION RATE SHALL EXCEED THE DESIGN INFILTRATION RATE OF 0.20INCHES/HOUR.2.h. THE AVERAGE OF THE MEASURED INFILTRATION RATES MUST MEET OR EXCEED THE DESIGN RATE OF0.20 INCHES/HOUR DIVIDED BY THE CORRECTION FACTOR USED IN CALCULATING THE DESIGN RATEAS NOTED IN TABLE 12.INF.8 FROM THE LATEST EDITION OF THE MINNESOTA STORMWATERMANUAL.IF THE INFILTRATION RATE AS TESTED DOES NOT MEET OR EXCEED THE REQUIRED RATE ASDETERMINED ABOVE, CONTRACTOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO COMPLETE SOIL CORRECTIVE AND/ORSOIL REPLACEMENT WORK AS NECESSARY WITHIN THE INFILTRATION BASIN AREA AT THECONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE UNTIL THE INFILTRATION RATE AS TESTED EXCEEDS THE REQUIRED RATE ASDETERMINED ABOVE. SUBSEQUENT RE-TESTING WILL BE REQUIRED UNTIL THE INFILTRATION ASTESTED EXCEEDS THE REQUIRED RATE AS DETERMINED ABOVE. RE-TESTING SHALL BE AT THECONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE AND WILL BE DEDUCTED FROM THE AMOUNT DUE THE CONTRACTOR.INFILTRATION BASIN CONSTRUCTION NOTESSAWCUT LINELIMITS OF DISTURBANCETHE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL XX. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINEDACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTINGSUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTINGUTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THECONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BYHIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD).IF THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TILE WITHIN THE SITE, HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER WITH THE LOCATION, SIZE,INVERT AND IF THE TILE LINE IS ACTIVE. NO DRAIN TILE SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ENGINEER.IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSEDIMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.SCALE IN FEET06030City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8f) Title: Meadowbrook Manor – Conditional Use PermitPage 26 SCALE IN FEET06030I hereby certify that this plan, specification orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensedprofessional ENGINEER under the laws of the stateof Minnesota.If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of thisplan which is available upon request at Sambatek's,Minnetonka, MN office.Registration No.Date:05/31/201650475Eric T. LuthProjectLocationDateSubmittal / RevisionNo.CertificationSheet TitleSummaryRevision HistorySheet No.RevisionProject No.ByDesigned:Drawn:Approved: Book / Page:Phase: Initial Issue:ClientBIGOSMANAGEMENT8325 WAYZATA BLVD, SUITE 300GOLDEN VALLEY, MNMEADOWBROOKCLUBHOUSEST. LOUIS PARK,MN6922 - 6932 MEADOWBROOK BLVDETLJMWEWMPRELIMINARY05/31/201620555PRELIMINARY06/20/16 JEB CITY COMMENTS07/13/16 JEB WATERSHED PERMITLEGEND Jul 13, 2016 - 1:02pm - User:577 L:\PROJECTS\20555\dwg\Civil\Preliminary\20555-C501-UTIL.dwgC6.01UTILITY PLAN1. THE UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCEWITH THE "STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATIONS" AS PUBLISHED BY THE CITY ENGINEERSASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM), EXCEPT AS MODIFIED HEREIN. CONTRACTOR SHALLOBTAIN A COPY OF THESE SPECIFICATIONS.1.1. ALL UTILITIES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS.1.2. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT OPEN, TURN OFF, INTERFERE WITH, OR ATTACH ANY PIPEOR HOSE TO OR TAP WATERMAIN BELONGING TO THE CITY UNLESS DULYAUTHORIZED TO DO SO BY THE CITY. ANY ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES OF ANYSCHEDULED OR UNSCHEDULED DISRUPTIONS OF SERVICE TO THE PUBLIC ARE THELIABILITY OF CONTRACTOR.1.3. A MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION OF 18 INCHES AND HORIZONTAL SEPARATION OF10-FEET BETWEEN OUTSIDE PIPE DIAMETERS IS REQUIRED AT ALL WATERMAIN ANDSEWER MAIN (BUILDING, STORM AND SANITARY) CROSSINGS.2. ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED IN CEAM SPECIFICATIONS EXCEPT AS MODIFIEDHEREIN.2.1. ALL MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY.2.2. ALL SANITARY SEWER TO BE PVC SDR-26, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.2.2.1. ALL SANITARY SEWER SERVICES TO BUILDING SHALL BE PVC SCH 40CONFORMING TO ASTM D2665.2.3. ALL WATERMAIN TO BE DUCTILE IRON - CLASS 52, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.2.3.1. ALL WATERMAIN TO HAVE 7.5-FEET OF COVER OVER TOP OF WATERMAIN.2.3.2. PROVIDE THRUST BLOCKING AND MECHANICAL JOINT RESTRAINTS ON ALLWATERMAIN JOINTS PER CITY STANDARDS.2.4. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE TO BE SMOOTH INTERIOR DUAL WALL HDPE PIPE WITHWATER TIGHT GASKETS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.2.2.1. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE FOR ROOF DRAIN SERVICES TO BUILDING SHALL BEPVC SCH 40 CONFORMING TO ASTM D2665.2.3. RIP RAP SHALL BE Mn/DOT CLASS 3.3. COORDINATE ALL BUILDING SERVICE CONNECTION LOCATIONS AND INVERT ELEVATIONSWITH MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.4. ALL BUILDING SERVICE CONNECTIONS (STORM, SANITARY, WATER) WITH FIVE FEET OR LESSCOVER ARE TO BE INSULATED FROM BUILDING TO POINT WHERE 5-FEET OF COVER ISACHIEVED.5. CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TOADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT.CONTRACTOR WILL BE HELD SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES TO THE ADJACENTPROPERTIES OCCURRING DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT.6. SAFETY NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS: IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERALLY ACCEPTEDCONSTRUCTION PRACTICES, CONTRACTOR WILL BE SOLELY AND COMPLETELY RESPONSIBLEFOR CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE, INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTYDURING PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. THIS REQUIREMENT WILL APPLY CONTINUOUSLYAND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS. THE DUTY OF THE ENGINEER OR THEDEVELOPER TO CONDUCT CONSTRUCTION REVIEW OF CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE IS NOTINTENDED TO INCLUDE REVIEW OF THE ADEQUACY OF CONTRACTOR'S SAFETY MEASURES IN,ON OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION SITE.7. ALL AREAS OUTSIDE THE PROPERTY BOUNDARIES THAT ARE DISTURBED BY UTILITYCONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED IN KIND. SODDED AREAS SHALL BE RESTORED WITH 6INCHES OF TOPSOIL PLACED BENEATH THE SOD.8. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROLDEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGMEN AND LIGHTSTO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICESSHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONSTANDARDS.9. ALL SOILS TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY AN INDEPENDENT SOILS ENGINEER.EXCAVATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF REMOVING UNSTABLE OR UNSUITABLE SOILS SHALL BECOMPLETED AS REQUIRED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE UTILITY BACKFILL CONSTRUCTIONSHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOILS ENGINEER. CONTRACTOR SHALL BERESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOILS TESTS AND SOIL INSPECTIONS WITHTHE SOILS ENGINEER.A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT HAS BEEN COMPLETED BY:COMPANY: ___________________________________________ADDRESS: ____________________________________________PHONE: _______________________________________________DATED: _______________________________________________CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THIS SOILS REPORT.11. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT 2 COPIES OF SHOP DRAWINGS FOR MANHOLE AND CATCHBASIN STRUCTURES TO ENGINEER. CONTRACTOR SHALL ALLOW 5 WORKING DAYS FOR SHOPDRAWING REVIEW.12. CONTRACTOR AND MATERIAL SUPPLIER SHALL DETERMINE THE MINIMUM DIAMETERREQUIRED FOR EACH STORM SEWER STRUCTURE.TELEPHONEELECTRICGAS LINEFORCEMAIN (SAN.)EASEMENTWATERMAINSANITARY SEWEREXISTINGPROPOSEDSTORM SEWERCURB & GUTTERDRAINTILEDSSSLSUTILITY CONSTRUCTION NOTESTHE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL XX. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINEDACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTINGSUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTINGUTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THECONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BYHIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD).IF THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TILE WITHIN THE SITE, HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER WITH THE LOCATION, SIZE,INVERT AND IF THE TILE LINE IS ACTIVE. NO DRAIN TILE SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ENGINEER.IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSEDIMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.SAWCUT LINELIMITS OFDISTURBANCE08/09/16 ETL CITY COUNCIL REVIEWPROPOSED FIBEROPTIC CONDUITROUTE TO BUILDINGCity Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8f) Title: Meadowbrook Manor – Conditional Use PermitPage 27 SCALE IN FEET06030ProjectLocationDateSubmittal / RevisionNo.CertificationSheet TitleSummaryRevision HistorySheet No.RevisionProject No.ByDesigned:Drawn:Approved: Book / Page:Phase: Initial Issue:ClientBIGOSMANAGEMENT8325 WAYZATA BLVD, SUITE 300GOLDEN VALLEY, MNMEADOWBROOKCLUBHOUSEST. LOUIS PARK,MN6922 - 6932 MEADOWBROOK BLVDETLJMWEWMPRELIMINARY05/31/201620555PRELIMINARY06/20/16 JEB CITY COMMENTS07/13/16 JEB WATERSHED PERMIT Jul 13, 2016 - 1:03pm - User:577 L:\PROJECTS\20555\dwg\Civil\Preliminary\20555-L101-LAND.dwgL1.01LANDSCAPEPLANTREESCODE BOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAMECONT CAL SIZE QTYBEAesculus x arnoldiana `Autumn Splendor` / Autumn Splendor Buckeye B & B 2.5"Cal4HLGleditsia triacanthos `Skyline` / Skyline Honey LocustB & B 2.5"Cal1SO Quercus bicolor / Swamp White OakB & B 2.5"Cal5PEUlmus americana `Princeton` / American ElmB & B 2.5"Cal3CONIFERS CODE BOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAMECONT CAL SIZE QTYNS Picea abies / Norway SpruceB & B6` 14ORN. TREES CODE BOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAMECONT CAL SIZE QTYSB Amelanchier canadensis `Autumn Brilliance` / Autumn Brilliance Serviceberry B & B 2"Cal6DPBetula platyphylla `Fargo` TM / Dakota Pinnacle BirchB & B 2"Cal6SS Malus x `Spring Snow` / Spring Snow Crab AppleB & B 2"Cal1JLSyringa reticulata / Japanese Tree LilacB & B 2"Cal3SHRUBSCODE BOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAMECONTQTYBC Aronia melanocarpa `Autumn Magic` / Autumn Magic Black Chokeberry5 gal5CD Cornus sericea `Alleman`s Compact` / Dwarf Red Twig Dogwood5 gal3BHDiervilla lonicera / Dwarf Bush Honeysuckle5 gal57LHHydrangea paniculata `Jane` / Little Lime Hydrangea5 gal10MJJuniperus chinensis `Mint Julep` / Mint Julep Juniper5 gal22SJ Juniperus sabina `Scandia` / Scandia Juniper5 gal14TS Spiraea betulifolia `Tor` / Birchleaf Spirea5 gal27LBSyringa x `Bloomerang` / Lilac5 gal15MVViburnum lantana `Mohican` / Mohican Wayfaring Tree5 gal9GRASSESCODE BOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAMECONTQTYKFG Calamagrostis x acutiflora `Karl Foerster` / Feather Reed Grass1 gal80PERENNIALS CODE BOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAMECONTQTYLMAAlchemilla mollis `Thriller` / Lady`s Mantle1 gal5BDLHemerocallis x `Baja` / Baja Daylily1 gal7KOL Liatris spicata `Kobold` / Spike Gayfeather1 gal18WLC Nepeta x faassenii `Walkers Low` / Walkers Low Catmint1 gal26BES Rudbeckia fulgida `Goldstrum` / Black Eyed Susan1 gal15GROUND COVERS CODE BOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAMEQTYTUR MNTurf Seed MN 32-241 / Native Construction Seed Mix6,467 sfPLANT SCHEDULExONE CANOPY OR EVERGREEN TREE PER 1,000 SF OF GROSS BUILDING FLOOR AREAxSIX SHRUBS PER 1,000 SF OF GROSS BUILDING FLOOR AREAPLANT TYPEREQUIREDPROVIDEDOVERTORY TREES 12 13EVERGREEN TREES- 14 ORNAMENTAL TREES- 15SHRUBS71 162CITY LANDSCAPE CODECity Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8f) Title: Meadowbrook Manor – Conditional Use PermitPage 28 ProjectLocationDateSubmittal / RevisionNo.CertificationSheet TitleSummaryRevision HistorySheet No.RevisionProject No.ByDesigned:Drawn:Approved: Book / Page:Phase: Initial Issue:ClientBIGOSMANAGEMENT8325 WAYZATA BLVD, SUITE 300GOLDEN VALLEY, MNMEADOWBROOKCLUBHOUSEST. LOUIS PARK,MN6922 - 6932 MEADOWBROOK BLVDETLJMWEWMPRELIMINARY05/31/201620555PRELIMINARY06/20/16 JEB CITY COMMENTS07/13/16 JEB WATERSHED PERMITGENERAL NOTES:1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT THE SITE AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE EXISTINGCONDITIONS RELATING TO THE NATURE AND SCOPE OF THE WORK.2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY PLAN LAYOUT AND BRING TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPEARCHITECT DISCREPANCIES WHICH MAY COMPROMISE THE DESIGN OR INTENT OF THE LAYOUT.3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES,REGULATIONS, AND PERMITS GOVERNING THE WORK.4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING ROADS, CURBS/GUTTERS, TRAILS, TREES, LAWNS ANDSITE ELEMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION. DAMAGE TO SAME SHALL BE REPAIRED AND/ORREPLACED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER.5. LOCATE AND VERIFY ALL UTILITIES, INCLUDING IRRIGATION LINES, WITH THE OWNER FORPROPRIETARY UTILITIES AND GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE DIGGING. CONTRACTORSHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROTECTION AND REPAIR OF ANY DAMAGES TO SAME. NOTIFYTHE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY CONFLICTS TO FACILITATE PLANT RELOCATION.6.THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION ANDPLANTING INSTALLATION WITH OTHER CONTRACTORS WORKING ON SITE.7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW THE SITE FOR DEFICIENCIES IN SITE CONDITIONS WHICH MIGHTNEGATIVELY AFFECT PLANT ESTABLISHMENT, SURVIVAL OR WARRANTY. UNDESIRABLE SITECONDITIONS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TOBEGINNING OF WORK.8. THE PLAN TAKES PRECEDENCE OVER THE LANDSCAPE LEGEND IF DISCREPANCIES EXIST.QUANTITIES SHOWN IN THE PLANTING SCHEDULE ARE FOR THE CONTRACTOR'S CONVENIENCE.CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY QUANTITIES SHOWN ON THE PLAN.9. THE SPECIFICATIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER THE PLANTING NOTES AND GENERAL NOTES.10. EXISTING TREES AND SHRUBS TO REMAIN SHALL BE PROTECTED TO THE DRIP LINE FROM ALLCONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC, STORAGE OF MATERIALS ETC. WITH 4' HT. ORANGE PLASTIC SAFETYFENCING ADEQUATELY SUPPORTED BY STEEL FENCE POSTS 6' O.C. MAXIMUM SPACING.11. LONG-TERM STORAGE OF MATERIALS OR SUPPLIES ON-SITE WILL NOT BE ALLOWED.12. CONTRACTOR SHALL REQUEST IN WRITING, A FINAL ACCEPTANCE INSPECTION.PLANTING NOTES:1. NO PLANTS SHALL BE INSTALLED UNTIL FINAL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEENCOMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA.2. A GRANULAR PRE-EMERGENT HERBICIDE SHALL BE APPLIED TO ALL PLANT BEDS AT THEMANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDED RATE PRIOR TO PLANT INSTALLATION.3. ALL PLANTING STOCK SHALL CONFORM TO THE "AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK,"ANSI-Z60, LATEST EDITION, OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN, INC. AND SHALLCONSTITUTE MINIMUM QUALITY REQUIREMENTS FOR PLANT MATERIALS.4. OVERSTORY TREES SHALL BEGIN BRANCHING NO LOWER THAN 6' ABOVE PAVED SURFACES.5. ALL PLANTS MUST BE HEALTHY, VIGOROUS MATERIAL, FREE OF PESTS AND DISEASE AND BECONTAINER GROWN OR BALLED AND BURLAPPED AS INDICATED IN THE LANDSCAPE LEGEND.6. PLANT MATERIALS TO BE INSTALLED PER PLANTING DETAILS.7. ALL TREES MUST BE STRAIGHT TRUNKED AND FULL HEADED AND MEET ALL REQUIREMENTSSPECIFIED.8. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT ANY PLANTS WHICH ARE DEEMEDUNSATISFACTORY BEFORE, DURING, OR AFTER INSTALLATION.9. NO SUBSTITUTIONS OF PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE ACCEPTED UNLESS APPROVED IN WRITING BYTHE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.10. ALL PLANT MATERIAL QUANTITIES, SHAPES OF BEDS AND LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLETE COVERAGE OF ALL PLANTING BEDS ATSPACING SHOWN AND ADJUSTED TO CONFORM TO THE EXACT CONDITIONS OF THE SITE. THELANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHALL APPROVE THE STAKING LOCATION OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS PRIORTO INSTALLATION.11. ALL PLANTING AREAS MUST BE COMPLETELY MULCHED AS SPECIFIED.12. MULCH: SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH, CLEAN AND FREE OF NOXIOUS WEEDS OR OTHERDELETERIOUS MATERIAL, IN ALL MASS PLANTING BEDS AND FOR TREES, UNLESS INDICATED ASROCK MULCH ON DRAWINGS. SUBMIT SAMPLE TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO DELIVERYON-SITE FOR APPROVAL. DELIVER MULCH ON DAY OF INSTALLATION. USE 4" FOR SHRUB BEDS,AND 3" FOR PERENNIAL/GROUND COVER BEDS, UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED.13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL MULCHES AND PLANTING SOIL QUANTITIES TOCOMPLETE THE WORK SHOWN ON THE PLAN.14. USE ANTI-DESICCANT (WILTPRUF OR APPROVED EQUAL) ON DECIDUOUS PLANTS MOVED IN LEAFAND FOR EVERGREENS MOVED ANYTIME. APPLY AS PER MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTION. ALLEVERGREENS SHALL BE SPRAYED IN THE LATE FALL FOR WINTER PROTECTION DURING WARRANTYPERIOD.14. PLANTING SOIL FOR TREES, SHRUBS AND GROUND COVERS: FERTILE FRIABLE LOAMCONTAINING A LIBERAL AMOUNT (4% MIN.) OF HUMUS AND CAPABLE OF SUSTAININGVIGOROUS PLANT GROWTH. IT SHALL COMPLY WITH MNDOT SPECIFICATION 3877 TYPE BSELECT TOPSOIL. MIXTURE SHALL BE FREE FROM HARDPACK SUBSOIL, STONES,CHEMICALS, NOXIOUS WEEDS, ETC. SOIL MIXTURE SHALL HAVE A PH BETWEEN 6.1 AND 7.5AND 10-0-10 FERTILIZER AT THE RATE OF 3 POUNDS PER CUBIC YARD. IN PLANTING BEDSINCORPORATE THIS MIXTURE THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE BED IN A 6" LAYER ANDROTO-TILLING IT INTO THE TOP 12" OF SOIL AT A 1:1 RATIO.ANY PLANT STOCK NOT PLANTEDON DAY OF DELIVERY SHALL BE HEELED IN AND WATERED UNTIL INSTALLATION. PLANTS NOTMAINTAINED IN THIS MANNER WILL BE REJECTED.15. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE GUARANTEED FOR TWO COMPLETE GROWING SEASONS (APRIL 1 -NOVEMBER 1), UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. THE GUARANTEE SHALL COVER THE FULL COST OFREPLACEMENT INCLUDING LABOR AND PLANTS.16. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AT LEAST 3 DAYS PRIOR TO PLANNEDDELIVERY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AT LEAST 24 HOURS INADVANCE OF BEGINNING PLANT INSTALLATION.17. SEASONS/TIME OF PLANTING AND SEEDING: NOTE: THE CONTRACTOR MAY ELECT TO PLANT INOFF-SEASONS ENTIRELY AT HIS/HER RISK. DECIDUOUS17.1.POTTED PLANTS: 4/1 - 6/1; 9/21 - 11/117.2.DECIDUOUS /B&B: 4/1 - 6/1; 9/21 - 11/117.3.EVERGREEN POTTED PLANTS: 4/1 - 6/1; 9/21-11/117.4.EVERGREEN B&B: 4/1 - 5/1; 9/21 - 11/1 17.5.TURF/LAWN SEEDING: 4/1 - 6/1; 7/20 - 9/2018. MAINTENANCE SHALL BEGIN IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH PORTION OF THE WORK IS IN PLACE.PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE PROTECTED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL THE INSTALLATION OF THEPLANTS IS COMPLETE, INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE, AND PLANTINGS ARE ACCEPTED EXCLUSIVEOF THE GUARANTEE. MAINTENANCE SHALL INCLUDE WATERING, CULTIVATING, MULCHING,REMOVAL OF DEAD MATERIALS, RE-SETTING PLANTS TO PROPER GRADE AND KEEPING PLANTS INA PLUMB POSITION. AFTER ACCEPTANCE, THE OWNER SHALL ASSUME MAINTENANCERESPONSIBILITIES. HOWEVER, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTINUE TO BE RESPONSIBLE FORKEEPING THE TREES PLUMB THROUGHOUT THE GUARANTEE PERIOD.19. ANY PLANT MATERIAL WHICH DIES, TURNS BROWN, OR DEFOLIATES (PRIOR TO TOTALACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK) SHALL BE PROMPTLY REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND REPLACED WITHMATERIAL OF THE SAME SPECIES, QUANTITY, AND SIZE AND MEETING ALL LANDSCAPE LEGENDSPECIFICATIONS.20. WATERING: MAINTAIN A WATERING SCHEDULE WHICH WILL THOROUGHLY WATER ALL PLANTSONCE A WEEK. IN EXTREMELY HOT, DRY WEATHER, WATER MORE OFTEN AS REQUIRED BYINDICATIONS OF HEAT STRESS SUCH AS WILTING LEAVES. CHECK MOISTURE UNDER MULCH PRIORTO WATERING TO DETERMINE NEED. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE THE NECESSARYARRANGEMENTS FOR WATER.TURF NOTES:TURF ESTABLISHMENT SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONSOF THE MN/DOT 2105 AND 2575 EXCEPT AS MODIFIED BELOW:1. ALL AREAS TO RECEIVE SOD SHALL ALSO RECEIVE 4" OF TOPSOIL PRIOR TOINSTALLING SOD. TOPSOIL SHALL BE FREE OF TREE ROOTS, STUMPS, BUILDING MATERIAL,AND TRASH, AND SHALL BE FREE OF STONES LARGER THAN 1 12" INCHES IN ANY DIMENSION.2. WHERE SOD ABUTS PAVED SURFACES, FINISHED GRADE OF SOD/SEED SHALL BE HELD 1" BELOWSURFACE ELEVATION OF TRAIL, SLAB, CURB, ETC.3. SOD SHALL BE LAID PARALLEL TO THE CONTOURS AND SHALL HAVE STAGGERED JOINTS. ONSLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 OR IN DRAINAGE SWALES, SOD SHALL BE STAKED SECURELY.4. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE TURF SEEDED, ARE TO RECEIVE 4" TOP SOIL, SEED, MULCH, ANDWATER UNTIL A HEALTHY STAND OF GRASS IS OBTAINED. FOR SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 OR INDRAINAGE SWALES INSTALL EROSION CONTROL BLANKET.5. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO RECEIVE NATIVE SEED, ARE TO RECEIVE PLANTING SOIL, SEED, MULCH,AND WATER UNTIL A HEALTHY STAND OF GRASS IS OBTAINED. FOR SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 ORIN DRAINAGE SWALES INSTALL EROSION CONTROL BLANKET.IRRIGATION NOTES:1. IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE DESIGN/BUILD. CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGSFOR APPROVAL OF SYSTEM LAYOUT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.2. ALL SOD TO RECEIVE SPRAY OR ROTOR IRRIGATION HEADS WITH MINIMUM DESIGN OF1" IRRIGATION PER WEEK.3. ALL PLANT BEDS TO RECEIVE DRIP LINE IRRIGATION , WITH A MINIMUM DESIGN OF .25"IRRIGATION PER WEEK.4. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL A TOTAL OF 4 QUICK COUPLERS AT THE CORNERS OF THEPROPERTY. A 2.5" TYPE K SOURCE PIPE IS PROVIDED BY MECHANICAL.NOTESTREE PLANTING DETAILNTSPROVIDE & INSTALL RODENT PROTECTION1/2" HARDWIRE CLOTH, MESH CYLINDER, 8" DIA ORGREATER X 36" HT.. STAKE IN PLACEINSTALL TREE WITH ROOT FLARE VISIBLE AT TOP OFTHE ROOT BALL. REMOVE SOIL IN LEVEL MANNER FROMTOP OF ROOT BALL TO EXPOSE 1ST 1/2" OR LARGER MAINORDER ROOT IF NEEDED. SET ROOT BALL WITH MAINORDER ROOT 1" ABOVE ADJACENT GRADE. DO NOTCOVER TOP OF ROOT BALL WITH SOIL.PLACE NO MULCH IN CONTACT WITH TREE TRUNKREMOVE BURLAP, TWINE, ROPE AND WIRE FROMTOP HALF OF ROOT BALLBUILD 4" HIGH EARTH SAUCER BEYOND EDGE OFROOT BALLEDGE CONDITION VARIESPLACE ROOT BALL ON UNDISTURBED ORCOMPACTED SOILSCARIFY SIDES OF TREE PIT WITH SPADE BY HANDTO BIND WITH PREPARED SOILPLANTING SOIL, REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS, COMPACT TO 85%OF MAX. DRY UNIT WEIGHT ACCORDING TO ASTM D 698TAMP SOIL AROUND ROOT BALL BASE FIRMLY WITH FOOTPRESSURE SO THAT ROOT BALL DOES NOT SHIFTDIG PLANTING PIT 4" TO 6"DEEPER THAN ROOT BALLUNDISTURBEDSUBGRADENOTE:CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN TREES IN A PLUMBPOSITION THROUGHOUT THE WARRANTY PERIOD. IFSTAKING IS REQUIRED BY SITE CONDITIONS,CONTRACTOR TO USE 2 OR 3 STAKE METHOD WITH 1"WEBBING AROUND TRUNK OF THREE (NO WIRE ORCABLING TO BE USED)WRAP TREE TRUNKS ONLY UPON APPROVAL BYLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT11L2.011SHRUB PLANTING DETAILNTSL2.01INSTALL 2" LAYER OF MULCH, DO NOT PLACE INCONTACT W/ SHRUB STEMAPPLY PRE-EMERGENT HERBICIDEEDGE CONDITION VARIESEDGER, REFER TO PLAN AND SPECIFICATIONLOOSEN ROOTS OF CONTAINER GROWN PLANTSEXCAVATE PLANT BED MIN. 4" DEEPER THANROOT BALL HT.SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF PLANTING BEDWITH SPADEUNDISTURBED SUBGRADE2PERENNIAL PLANTING DETAILNTSL2.01INSTALL 1" LAYER OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH OR 2"LAYER OF FINELY SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. DO NOTPLACE IN CONTACT WITH PLANTEDGE CONDITION VARIESEDGER, REFER TO PLAN AND SPECIFICATIONLOOSEN ROOTS OF CONTAINER GROWN PLANTSPLANTING SOILSCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF PLANTING BED WITH SPADEUNDISTURBED SUBGRADENOTE:REFER TO EXTERIOR PLANTING SPECIFICATION3 Jul 13, 2016 - 1:03pm - User:577 L:\PROJECTS\20555\dwg\Civil\Preliminary\20555-L101-LAND.dwgL2.01DETAILSPOOL FENCE DETAILCity Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8f) Title: Meadowbrook Manor – Conditional Use PermitPage 29 City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8f) Title: Meadowbrook Manor – Conditional Use PermitPage 30 PAGE 1 OF 1Drawn By: SANDYDate:7/12/2016Scale: AS NOTEDRevisions# Date CommentsLIGHTNG CODES OR ORDINANCES.GENERAL NOTES:A. PULSE PRODUCTS DOES NOT ASSUME RESPONSIBILITYFOR THE INTERPRETATION OF THIS CALCULATION ORCOMPLAINCE TO THE LOCAL, STATE, OR FEDERALB. LIGHTING LAYOUT IS NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTIONDOCUMENTS BUT ONLY TO ILLUSTRATE THE PERFORMANCEOF THE PRODUCT.C. ALL READINGS/CALCULATIONS SHOWN ARE SHOWN ONOBJECTS/SURFACES.MEADOWBROOK CLUBHOUSEChecked By: TRENTPlan ViewScale: 1 inch= 25 Ft.WZKWK^h/>/E'ϱ͕ϵϬϬ^͘&͘&&сϵϭϴ͘Ϭ>&сϵϬϲ͘ϬDKtZKK<>s͘DKtZKK<>E>EDKtZKK<>E6060TWZKWK^h/>/E'ϱ͕ϵϬϬ^͘&͘&&сϵϭϴ͘Ϭ>&сϵϬϲ͘Ϭ/E&/>dZd/KE^/EKddKD>͘сϴϵϵ͘ϬϭϬϬͲzZ,t>сϵϬϮ͘ϬAAAAAAAAAADDDDBBBBCCCC0.70.30.10.02.50.00.0 0.1 2.2 5.5 1.33.8 1.6 3.84.30.00.11.6 2.2 3.25.10.21.3 1.8 3.0 3.71.41.63.8 3.2 2.30.00.50.00.1 0.00.0 0.0 0.00.00.0 0.0 0.01.20.01.4 2.1 4.1 6.3 3.0 1.1 0.4 0.24.20.15.30.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.01.40.00.0 0.10.10.00.2 0.1 0.1 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.02.30.06.30.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.6 1.6 3.30.60.00.11.2 1.8 3.4 5.5 2.4 1.3 1.0 0.60.00.23.30.1 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.00.40.01.40.20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.01.30.02.00.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.4 1.0 3.0 4.10.00.00.00.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.00.00.20.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 1.0 2.8 6.4 4.00.01.40.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.8 2.3 5.3 5.1 3.10.11.20.12.7 4.9 5.6 4.1 2.3 1.3 0.7 0.42.21.60.60.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.00.0 0.22.30.40.80.6 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.10.30.00.51.9 1.1 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.00.80.00.80.0 0.0 0.30.00.91.51.8 1.00.20.00.00.20.10.1 0.1 0.1 0.10.0 0.0 0.00.10.00.00.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.00.00.12.80.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.10.10.10.20.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.10.00.15.00.1 0.20.6 0.9 2.2 4.5 3.3 3.12.64.20.05.5 2.4 0.8 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.04.12.20.8 1.4 2.0 3.3 5.5 3.0 1.9 2.1 2.60.16.10.00.8 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.00.0 0.00.04.30.00.00.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.00.30.00.70.0 0.00.00.3 0.5 0.9 1.6 2.7 4.40.00.60.40.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.00.00.10.40.01.5 2.6 3.3 4.3 6.6 6.3 5.1 3.7 1.90.00.02.1 2.6 3.5 3.8 3.8 0.40.0 0.02.00.02.40.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 3.8 3.7 3.6 2.83.00.00.00.02.2 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.4 3.0 3.4 3.61.90.02.10.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 3.2 3.1 2.92.10.40.02.5 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.4 2.7 3.1 3.52.20.13.30.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.01.20.02.4 2.9 3.2 3.2 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.03.10.03.30.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.2 0.33.40.00.91.2 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.01.20.41.11.2 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.8 2.12.60.10.00.00.0 0.00.6 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.01.30.01.20.00.20.4 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.00.10.02.40.0 0.1 1.0 2.6 2.7 2.4 2.1 2.02.22.10.12.8 3.1 2.8 0.20.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.82.01.80.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.1 0.80.01.90.01.8 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.3 2.7 3.3 2.20.21.70.00.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.04.10.00.10.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.12.6 3.1 1.90.00.00.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.00.00.00.00.0 0.1 0.12.2 3.00.1 0.1 0.13.10.03.20.1 0.1 0.33.4 3.4 2.3 1.3 1.72.73.40.01.2 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.02.50.00.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.00.00.00.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.10.02.60.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.1 1.4 3.2 2.90.02.40.00.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.02.53.00.02.1 3.2 2.9 2.6 2.3 2.3 3.0 4.20.03.10.01.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.02.90.00.00.3 1.00.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.00.00.00.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.30.00.00.00.00.00.0 0.0 0.1 0.7 2.0 2.2 2.40.00.00.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.00.01 fc1 fc1 fc1 fc1 fc1 fc0.5 fc0.5 fc0.5 fc0.5 fc0.5 fc0.5 fc0.25 fc0.25 fc0.25 fc0.25 fc0.25 fcTYPE AA & BB - INVUE ARBOR SERIESTYPE DD - MODERN FORMS BALTHUS SERIESTYPE CC - MCGRAW GLEON SERIESLuminaire ScheduleCalculation SummaryLabelCalcTypeUnitsAvgMaxSymbolQtyLabelLuminaire Location SummaryLumNoLabelXYZMinArrangementLLFOrientTilt24AA503927.1150444.3DescriptionArr. WattsLum. Lumens14254.705025AA503961150412.114193.415Avg/Min026Max/MinAA503850.2150384.114332.7180SITE GROUNDIlluminanceFc0.936.627AA503878.3150415.914320.528028AA503933150365.1140.0N.A.N.A.128.865029BB503860.5150342.31046.3480PARKING30BB503902150337.310116.5650IlluminanceFc2.693.81.91.422.0031CC503904.9150250.625171.8320POOL32DD503861.6150291.18IlluminanceFc2.906.4262.528033DD1.22.425.33503870.9150289.385AASINGLE0.900INVUE ARB-B3-LED-D1-T4 MOUNT ON 12FT POLE WITH 2FT BASE9987402BBSINGLE0.900INVUE ARB-B1-LED-D1-T4 WALL MOUNT AT 10FT WITH EMERG BACKUP2424082CCSINGLE0.900MCGRAAW GLEON-AE-04-LED-E1-SL4-HSS MOUNT ON 22FT POLE WITH 3FT BASE213168002DDSINGLE0.900MODERN FORMS WS-W28521-GH A121715 WALL MOUNT AT 8FT9.2467262.528034CC503800.3150268.125350.6270City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8f) Title: Meadowbrook Manor – Conditional Use PermitPage 31 City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8f) Title: Meadowbrook Manor – Conditional Use PermitPage 32 City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8f) Title: Meadowbrook Manor – Conditional Use PermitPage 33 City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8f) Title: Meadowbrook Manor – Conditional Use PermitPage 34 City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8f) Title: Meadowbrook Manor – Conditional Use PermitPage 35 City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8f) Title: Meadowbrook Manor – Conditional Use PermitPage 36 City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8f) Title: Meadowbrook Manor – Conditional Use PermitPage 37 City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8f) Title: Meadowbrook Manor – Conditional Use PermitPage 38 Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: August 15, 2016 Action Agenda Item: 8g EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Arlington Row West Plat Revision and First Reading Major PUD Amendment RECOMMENDED ACTION:  Motion to Adopt Resolution approving the major amendment to the Final Plat of Arlington Row West.  Motion to approve First Reading of Ordinance amending Chapter 32 of the City Code relating to Arlington Row West Planned Unit Development, and to schedule the Second Reading for September 6, 2016. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council support the requested amendments to correct Plat errors and allow solar panel installation above a carport for Arlington Row West. SUMMARY: Melrose Company has submitted an application for a revision to the Plat for Arlington Row West to correct a surveyor error in the previously approved plat. In addition, applications have been submitted for Major Amendments to the PUDs for both Arlington Row East and Arlington Row West to add solar installations designed to be located above carports in the parking lots of both sites. This report is regarding the request for the Major Amendment to the PUD and Plat revision for Arlington Row West, located at 7905 Wayzata Blvd (southwest corner Wayzata Blvd and Texas Ave). The plat revision has been requested to amend the historically used legal description that the surveyor found to be ambiguous and to correct an error the initial surveyor made in drawing the north boundary line. The surveyor drew the north boundary line too far north. The PUD will be amended to reflect the changes associated with the plat. The developer is also requesting a major amendment to the PUD for Arlington Row West to incorporate a 40kw solar powered electrical installation that will be constructed above carport structures located on the western portion of the parking lot. This amendment is a major amendment to the Arlington Row West PUD Ordinance. A public hearing before the Planning Commission was held August 3, 2016. One person spoke against the entire project. The Planning Commission recommended approval with a 4-0 vote. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: None VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a leader in environmental stewardship. We will increase environmental consciousness and responsibility in all areas of city business. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion, Revised Plat Resolution, Draft Ordinance, Excerpt of Planning Commission Minutes, Lot Line Change Exhibit, Revised Plat, Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Solar Study, Solar Carport Schematics, Solar Renderings Prepared by: Julie Grove, Economic Development Specialist Reviewed by: Sean Walther, Planning and Zoning Supervisor Michele Schnitker, Deputy Community Development Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8g) Page 2 Title: Arlington Row West Plat Revision and First Reading Major PUD Amendment DISCUSSION BACKGROUND: In November 2015 the City Council approved a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Plat and PUD ordinance amendment for the Arlington Row Apartments West (Phase I) site to allow two, three-story apartment buildings with 17 units in each building (34 units total). The Arlington Row Apartments East (Phase II) PUD and Plat was approved in March 2016 to allow one three-story apartment building with 27 units. In December 2015, the Metropolitan Council awarded the Arlington Row development (both Arlington Row West & East) a $581,000 Livable Communities Demonstration Account (LCDA) grant to be used for stormwater, geothermal and solar/energy efficiency. As the developer made an application to register the title in anticipation of recording the approved plats two issues with the plat were discovered. First, the legal description that has been historically used for the Arlington Row West property was found to be ambiguous. As a result, the surveyor could not accurately pinpoint the exact location of the south eastern boundary line and thus could not place the corner markers required to register both the title and plat. A new, more specific, legal description for the plat has been written and the developer has made an application to the Hennepin County District Court for approval. This proceeding is pending. Once approved by the County the title and plat can be executed and recorded with the new legal description. The developer anticipates this proceeding to be complete by the end of August and is requesting the City approve the new Final Plat with the new legal description. The second issue, and the reason for the requested Final Plat Amendment, is that the initial surveyor made an error in drawing the initial Arlington Row West Plat boundary lines. The surveyor drew the north boundary line too far north and included a portion of the right of way in the plat that technically belongs to the city. As a result, the developer is requesting the city approve a revised plat that moves the north property line an average of 10-11 feet south (the shift ranges from 3-25 feet), which decreases the building setback to the north property line. See the attached Lot Line Change Exhibit. The developer is also requesting a major amendment to the PUD for both Arlington Row West and Arlington Row East to incorporate solar panels. During the PUD and Plat process it was anticipated that solar panels would be incorporated into the development utilizing the LCDA grant. Initially it was thought the panels would be placed on the building. The developer is proposing instead to install solar panels on top of carport structures that would be located within the parking lots of both sites. The proposed site modifications result in greater than a 10 percent change of the total site area, and other previously approved standards, thus the Zoning Code considers the requested change to be a Major Amendment. Site Information: Comprehensive Plan: Arlington Row West – Medium Density Residential Zoning: Arlington Row West - PUD 3 Neighborhood: Westwood Hills City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8g) Page 3 Title: Arlington Row West Plat Revision and First Reading Major PUD Amendment REVISED PLAT ANALYSIS: Description: The developer is requesting the city approve an amended Final Plat with a new legal description and a revised north property line for Arlington Row West. Utility Easement: The area that was removed from the plat was preserved as a utility easement that accommodated existing utilities in the area. It is actually part of the city’s right-of-way along Wayzata Blvd and the revised plat will correct this. The revised plat provides a 10-foot drainage and utility easement along the north side of the site as required by code. The remaining easements along the east, west and south property lines are the same as previously approved. Zoning Comparison: The shifted boundary line decreases the building setback from the north property line, and lot area, and percentage of DORA. It increases the density, floor area ratio and ground floor area ratio. This request does not change the buildings or parking lot’s design or placement (i.e. the building design has not changed and they will be built the same distance from the existing streets-Texas Ave and Wayzata Blvd). The following table shows the comparison of the affected requirements and outlines what is permitted, was approved and is proposed. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8g) Page 4 Title: Arlington Row West Plat Revision and First Reading Major PUD Amendment Factor Required Approved Proposed Met? Use Multiple- Family Residential Multiple-Family Residential Multiple-Family Residential Yes Building Setbacks None with a PUD North building min: 26.4 ft from north property line, 38.4 ft from West, 19 ft. from east; South building min.: 15 ft from east, 15 ft from south North building min: 13.7 ft from north property line, 38.4 ft from West, 19 ft. from east; South building min.: 15 ft from east, 15 ft from south Yes Lot Area Min 2 acres, less with approval 1.396 acres; City Council indicated this size was acceptable 2/2/15 1.316 acres (Together with Arlington Row East 2.23 acres) Yes if approved by Council Density 30 units per acre in RM- Medium Density Residential 24 units per acre 26 units per acre Yes Floor Area Ratio None with PUD 0.52 0.55 Yes Ground Floor Area Ratio N/A 0.18 0.19 Yes DORA 7,305 sf (12% gross lot area) 7,350 sf (13.7% gross lot area) 7,015 sf (12.2 % gross of new lot area) Yes *Revised, proposed numbers are in bold The above changes are minimal and do not affect the placement or design of the previously approved buildings and parking lot. The minimum lot area is smaller than the Council originally approved. However, staff does not believe this affects the project as a whole. Arlington Row West and Arlington Row East have been considered one project with two phases, and together the project area is 2.23 acres. PUD SOLAR ANALYSIS: Melrose Company is requesting approval of a 40kw solar powered electrical installation that will be constructed above a carport structure located on the western portion of the parking lot (see the attached site plan). The structure will be constructed of galvanized steel beams secured by concrete piers and, in addition to housing the solar panels (which will sit atop of the steel beams), it will shelter 19 parking stalls. A solar study was conducted and the location of the carport was selected to minimize shading and maximize solar capacity. The solar plan is attached. The solar installation was designed to generate at least 40kw of power. While actual energy generation is dependent on weather, shading, etc., it is anticipated that this system will generate an average of 54-55 kilowatt hours of power. This equates to approximately 40-45% of the electrical needs on site. The solar power will be hooked up to the main meter in the building. As the power is generated it will be used on site, decreasing the amount of power generated by Xcel. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8g) Page 5 Title: Arlington Row West Plat Revision and First Reading Major PUD Amendment Per the Zoning Code, these carport structures are considered an accessory structure. Below is an analysis of the code requirements affected by this proposal. Factor Required Proposed Met? Setbacks None with a PUD 46 ft from west property line, 7 feet from south Yes Height None with PUD 14 feet Yes Parking Off Street Parking - 52 52 stalls (unchanged from previous approval) Yes Landscaping See landscaping section Yes Setbacks: The approved PUD Ordinance for Arlington Row does not specify setbacks for accessory structures but in residential zoning districts accessory structures are typically permitted to be located up to 2 feet from property lines in the backyard. The plan provides setbacks of 46 feet from the west property line, and 7 feet from the south property line and 148 feet from the east property line. These setbacks were measured from the outer edge of the solar panels that overhang the posts. The proposed setbacks are greater than the typical 2 feet. Height: The zoning code allows accessory structures to be up to 15 feet in height. To maximize the amount of solar energy generated, the canopy holding the panels will likely lie flat instead tilted at a 10 degree slope as indicated on the plans. Thus the high point of the solar panels is proposed to be approximately 12 feet (14 would be the maximum if the canopy is sloped). The low point will be approximately 8-9 feet, providing ample room for vehicles underneath. Parking: The Arlington Row West approved parking plan provided 52 spaces. The amount of parking spaces remains unchanged at 52 spaces. Landscaping: To accommodate the solar carport structure, the developer has proposed eliminating one parking island which was located under the structure. The tree and shrubs from this island have been moved to other locations on site. In addition, the developer is proposing to move some of the trees located along the west side of the parking lot to minimize the amount of shading on the solar panels. The shading can be seen on the attached Solar Study. These trees have been added farther away on the western portion of the site, mixed in with the existing trees that are being saved. The amount of landscaping proposed is the same as was previously approved which included 34 trees and 178 shrubs with a total of 131 caliper inches. Staff believes the proposed changes are in keeping with the intent of the ordinance. Staff finds the above changes to be reasonable and do not affect the placement of the previously approved building and parking lot. The proposed solar carport structures will add the amenity of covered parking for residents and the solar installations satisfy the following objectives of the PUD zoning district:  Promote higher standards of site and building design.  More creative and efficient use of land.  Promote environmental sustainability in the development of land and building operations.  The use of on-site renewable energy is encouraged. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8g) Page 6 Title: Arlington Row West Plat Revision and First Reading Major PUD Amendment PUBLIC INPUT: A neighborhood meeting was held July 26, 2016. Two residents attended the meeting to get more information on the revisions to the plat and the proposed solar installations. The plans were well received. One person spoke against the project as a whole at the Public Hearing on August 3, 2016. The resident was concerned with the added traffic on Texas Avenue and the number of rental units being added to the area. They would prefer to see townhomes that are owned. NEXT STEPS: If approved, the second reading is scheduled for the September 6, 2016 meeting on the consent agenda. The developer is hoping to begin construction by this fall, 2016. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8g) Page 7 Title: Arlington Row West Plat Revision and First Reading Major PUD Amendment RESOLUTION NO. 16-____ Amends and Restates Resolution No. 15-163 RESOLUTION AMENDING AND RESTATING RESOLUTION 15-163 ADOPTED OCTOBER 19, 2015 APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF ARLINGTON ROW APARTMENTS WEST FOR PROPERTY AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF WAYZATA BOULEVARD AND TEXAS AVENUE 7905 WAYZATA BLVD BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of St. Louis Park: Findings 1. Melrose Company has submitted an application for approval of preliminary and final plat for land in the southwest corner of Wayzata Boulevard and Texas Avenue in the manner required for platting of land under the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code, and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder. 2. The proposed preliminary and final plat has been found to be in all respects consistent with the City Plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and the ordinances of the City of St. Louis Park. 3. The proposed plat is situated upon the following described lands in Hennepin County, Minnesota, to-wit legally described on Exhibit A: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (NW1/4 SW1/4) of Section 5, Township 117 North, Range 21 West, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the north line of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 5, distant 12 rods east of the northwest corner thereof; thence south for 20 rods; thence deflect to the left at an angle of 90 degrees 00 minutes and run easterly to the public road (known as Texas Avenue) running south from Wayzata Boulevard (as located and established prior to November 15, 1961); thence north along said public road to the south line of said Wayzata Boulevard; thence west to the point of beginning. Conclusion 1. The proposed preliminary and final plat of Arlington Row Apartments West is hereby approved and accepted by the City as being in accord and conformity with all ordinances, City plans and regulations of the City of St. Louis Park and the laws of the State of Minnesota, provided, however, that this approval is made subject to the opinion of the City Attorney and Certification by the City Clerk subject to the following conditions: a. No land disturbing activities, excluding demolition, may occur prior to recording the final plat with Hennepin County. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8g) Page 8 Title: Arlington Row West Plat Revision and First Reading Major PUD Amendment b. Prior to the City signing the final plat: i. Park dedication fees totaling $51,000 and trail dedication fees totaling $7,650 shall be paid to the City of St. Louis Park. ii. A financial security in the form of a cash escrow or letter of credit in the amount of $5,000 shall be submitted to the City to insure that a signed Mylar copy of the final plat is provided to the City and that iron monuments are placed at the property corners. iii. Developer shall enter into a Planning and Development Contract with the City which at a minimum addresses the following: a) The installation of public improvements, including, but not limited to: sidewalks, boulevards, landscaping, utility work, and street maintenance and repair. b) The installation of private improvements including, but not limited to: landscaping, a privately owned and privately maintained underground storm water management system and a maintenance agreement for said storm water management system. c) A financial security for the public and private site improvements. iv. The developer shall submit proof to the city that the title and new legal description have been confirmed by Hennepin County. c. A public easement for the sidewalk along Texas Avenue that lies outside the public right-of-way shall be granted to the City. Said easement shall be in a form approved by the City Attorney. d. Shall be consistent with Hennepin County’s approved legal description. de. The developer or owner shall pay an administrative fee of $750 per violation of any condition of this approval. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to supply two certified copies of this Resolution to the above-named owner, who is the applicant herein. 3. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute all contracts required herein, and the City Clerk is hereby directed to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon the said plat when all of the conditions set forth in Paragraph No. 1 above and the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code have been fulfilled. 4. Such execution of the certificate upon said plat by the City Clerk, as required under Section 26-123(1)j of the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code, shall be conclusive showing of proper City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8g) Page 9 Title: Arlington Row West Plat Revision and First Reading Major PUD Amendment compliance therewith by the subdivider and City officials charged with duties above described and shall entitle such plat to be placed on record forthwith without further formality. The City Clerk is instructed to record certified copies of this resolution in the Office of the Hennepin County Register of Deeds or Registrar of Titles as the case may be. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council August 15, 2016 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8g) Page 10 Title: Arlington Row West Plat Revision and First Reading Major PUD Amendment EXHIBIT A ARLINGTON ROW APARTMENTS WEST LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 5, Township 117 North, Range 21 West, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence South 89 degrees 57 minutes 27 seconds East (assumed bearing), along the north line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, a distance of 198.00 feet; thence South 2 degrees 29 minutes 51 seconds West a distance of 4.15 feet to the intersection with a line drawn 50.00 feet southerly of and parallel with the following described “Line A”, said point of intersection being the point of beginning of the parcel to be described, which point is marked by a Judicial Landmark set pursuant to Torrens Case No. 16472; thence South 2 degrees 46 minutes 47 seconds East a distance of 325.86 feet, to a point marked by a Judicial Landmark set pursuant to Torrens Case No. 16472; thence easterly, parallel with the north line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, a distance of 155.84 feet, to a point marked by a Judicial Landmark set pursuant to Torrens Case No. 16964; thence continue easterly, parallel with the north line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, a distance of 63.60 feet, to the west line of that portion of Texas Avenue as dedicated in JOHNSON'S AND BRANT'S ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, said Hennepin County; thence North 0 degrees 57 minutes 27 seconds West, along said west line of that portion of Texas Avenue and its northerly extension, a distance of 280.80 feet, to the intersection with a line drawn 50.00 feet southerly of and parallel with the following described “Line A”, thence northwesterly 235.64 feet, along said parallel line, being an 843.94 foot radius non-tangential curve, concave to the northeast, having a central angle of 15 degrees 59 minutes 52 seconds, the chord of said curve is 234.88 feet in length and bears North 78 degrees 59 minutes 01 seconds West, to the point of beginning and there terminating. “Line A” is described as beginning at the northeast corner of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 5; thence westerly, along the north line of said Southwest Quarter, a distance of 2421.40 feet; thence northwesterly a distance of 484.58 feet along a tangential curve, concave to the north, having a radius of 793.94 feet and a central angle of 34 degrees 58 minutes 15 seconds and said “Line A” there terminating. to be platted as Lot 1, Block 1, ARLINGTON ROW APARTMENTS WEST) City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8g) Page 11 Title: Arlington Row West Plat Revision and First Reading Major PUD Amendment ORDINANCE NO. ____-16 ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 36-268-PUD 3 RELATING TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7905 WAYZATA BLVD THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK DOES ORDAIN: Findings Sec. 1. The City Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission (Case No. 15-29-CP, 15-30-S and 15-31-PUD). Sec. 2. The Comprehensive Plan designates this property as RM – Medium Density Residential. Sec. 3. The City Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission (Case No. 16-33-PUD) for amending Ordinance 2481-15 to revise the legal description and modify the plat north boundary line. Sec. 4. The St. Louis Park Ordinance Code, Sections 36-268-PUD 3 are hereby amended by adding underscored language. Section breaks are represented by ***. *** (a) Development Plan *** 26. Solar Canopy Schematics 27. Solar Study *** (c) Accessory Uses *** (6) Solar panels as regulated by this Chapter. a. Rooftop or building mounted systems 1. Roof or building mounted solar systems shall not exceed the maximum allowed height in the PUD zoning district. b. Ground or accessory structure mounted solar systems 1. The height of a ground or accessory structure mounted solar system, measured when oriented at maximum design tilt, shall not exceed 15 feet. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8g) Page 12 Title: Arlington Row West Plat Revision and First Reading Major PUD Amendment 2. Ground or accessory structure mounted solar systems shall have a minimum setback of 7 feet from the south property line, 46 feet from the west property line and shall be subject to the principal building setbacks along the north and east property lines. Sec. 5. The contents of Planning Case File 16-31-S and 16-33-PUD are hereby entered into and made part of the public hearing record and the record of decision for this case. Sec. 6. This Ordinance shall take effect fifteen days after its publication. Public Hearing August 3, 2016 First Reading August 15, 2016 Second Reading September 6, 2016 Date of Publication September 15, 2016 Date Ordinance takes effect September 30, 2016 Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council September 6, 2016 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Approved as to Form and Execution: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Soren Mattick, City Attorney City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8g) Page 13 Title: Arlington Row West Plat Revision and First Reading Major PUD Amendment Excerpts – Unofficial Minutes PLANNING COMMISSION ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA AUGUST 3, 2016 – 6:00 p.m. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 3. Public Hearings B. Plat Revision and Major Amendment to Planned Unit Development Location: 7905 Wayzata Blvd. - Arlington Row Apartments West Applicant: Melrose Company Case No.: 16-31-S, 16-33-PUD Julie Grove, Economic Development Specialist, presented the staff report. Ms. Grove explained that a major amendment to the PUD is being requested to add solar installations above carports at the site. A revision for the plat for Arlington Row Apartments West is also requested to correct a surveyor error in the previously approved plat. Commissioner Carper spoke about the PUD no longer being greater than 2 acres at one particular site. The sites are not contiguous and are separated by a block. He asked if this was unusual. Sean Walther, Planning and Zoning Supervisor, said it is atypical in two separate sites. He said the Arlington development is treated as two separate PUDs. The Council previously approved the West site at a smaller than two acre lot size. Because of the adjustment to north property line it becomes smaller yet. He said it is not unusual to have more than one property under one PUD, usually contiguous. The Arlington project is two separate PUDs and each of these are less than two acres. But they are understood and approved as Phase I and Phase II property. Commissioner Carper said facing west from the carports there seems to be a large vegetated area. He asked for details about that area. Ms. Grove said several trees will remain there and several trees will be added. She spoke about the hill there and said the area will remain vegetation. Commissioner Carper asked if this would be maintained as green space or prairie development or if it would grow wild. Robert Cunningham, applicant, said due to the significant grade change at the area it will be left natural and untouched. Commissioner Carper said unmaintained areas in the city are frequently overrun by noxious types of weeds and bushes such as buckthorn and wild garlic. He asked if that material would be removed. Mr. Cunningham stated his understanding of buckthorn is that it grows along the edges of wooded areas. They would be diligent in removing buckthorn along the edge of the woods facing the solar area. He said he has seen garlic mustard on the site but only in grassy areas, not on the slope. He said he wouldn’t spray any herbicides on the slope as he wouldn’t want to kill off any native vegetation. Removing garlic mustard on the slope would be very difficult. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8g) Page 14 Title: Arlington Row West Plat Revision and First Reading Major PUD Amendment Commissioner Robertson asked about the efficiency of flat solar panels. Mr. Cunningham responded that the carport runs north-south on the Arlington West site. The options for the panels were flat or saw-tooth design. They chose not to do the saw- tooth design as that would expose the cars under the carport to the weather from the north. He added that the panels have some translucency as solar panels let light through as well as capture light. Commissioner Person asked if they expect to ever generate excess power. Mr. Cunningham said according to the engineers, the 40 kilowatt solar installation would generate 40-45% of the electrical needs of the project. That means the project would never generate excess power in the course of a year. Commissioner Person opened the public hearing. Illson Johnson, 1319 Texas Ave. S., a 30-year resident, said the Texas/Wayzata traffic corner has been changed. She remarked that traffic and parking on Texas Ave. has already been difficult and even more so now with bike lanes. She remarked that the area is a residential area without apartments. She said she would rather see townhomes at that location. She said she is concerned about apartment resident parking. She said she hates that the development will be apartments. Commissioner Person clarified that the development has previously been approved and the current request is for an amendment regarding solar and a correction to the plat. Mr. Walther discussed the recent pavement management project where a short turn lane was striped to improve the overall traffic flow at the intersection. Commissioner Robertson commented that the development is visually one of the most modest apartment developments that has come before the Commission. The apartments have a townhome look with very low density. All 52 parking spaces will be on site. He said he doesn’t think the development will have much more impact than townhomes would have. He said he understands Ms. Johnson’s concerns but he believes the development will prove to be a respectful addition to the neighborhood. Ms. Johnson said homeowners take care of their homes and that is different from apartments and renters. She said she has concerns about parking and traffic due to apartment residents and visitors. As no one else was present wishing to speak, Commissioner Person closed the public hearing. Commissioner Carper said the requests are straightforward. He made a motion recommending approval of the revision to the Arlington Row West Plat and approval of the Major Amendment to the Arlington Row West PUD. Commissioner Torrey seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 4-0. zI : I - i s ?16,-f,vd PAVFMENT LECEND: SITE PIAN CENERAI. NOTES I. MINIMIJMSIIBACKS: mıñTE¡I'rl¡ñı3llB^cK = 2, rr s¡Dt'BtJil D|NC SITB^CK = t{) tT RIAR BUil DIN(; SITBACI( = ! TT 2. loNtN(ì ilß'iiñı zorulNc; =n-l 3. PARKINCSTJMMARY SilEiÃıETTiÎÎÃR3rnr r s = ¡q sURt ^0 il^Nt)t(:Appt.D stAt t_s = 3 TOI^t stìRt^cl sl^lt5 = 52 4. ARTA,/DINSITY'ä'äiÎ-IîTil r;0.,;os(t.fr ()R I ìe6 r\( l^1l,iRVl()lrSS{tR,^(, ^Rl^= tt.64lS(?t PJ R\1()trSSLtRt^( ì ^RtA 26 llì.1 s().It CONCRETE SIDEWALK CONCREIE PAVEMENT 20tu¡ SCALE IN FEET 40 & ----{-<{_t-+ stDtw^tk PI:DFSfRIAN RAMP /t:5 Él.vz.rc;l:v. PROPOSI I) 7ON'NC = PIJII IJII([ COTJNI SIJMMARY TTRDWi:ilM-= I Pf,R 1O PARKIN(; SIAI,TS =rot^t RrQrJtRtD= BlKt SlÂl LS lNSlDt = BIKt ST^llS OtJTS|Dt = TOTAI PROPOSFD = !)AIL_eEEqEE.YoUq!Gr ffi CIVILLEG€ND æOOooWØ øø l a H ø ôn4 @ 0) e & rx LOUCKS PLANNING CI\41 ENGINEËRING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECIURE ENVIRONI\IENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suitc 300 Maple crove, N,4N 553ó9 I 63.424 .5505 wwvi loucksinc con 05/27t16 - 100% CD's lllll) P'Dic.t l u!2-lr8n7Iñrr¡[¡llrllilfl¡ñr <.- r - .. .,o--r ."-, -i ,. €tx * : +- 34 4{) 25 r5 4t) Rf IAININ(J RAIIINC WHI Rt WAI L IS 30'oR l^lttR l=: E = ,. ¿l l I l \.. : i a l. (x0 791; A( = ;(,.¡lv;, (rR 0 6(ì1 ^( . = 4l t9i, 5. ^l.t.p^vtN(;,coN(iRillctJRB,(;tJìttR^Nf)sÍftwAt.Ksil^ilBLtURNtSttu)ANDlNst^t I I Il lN ^cCORt)^NCt WilII Il il I)t I^ttS SilOWN ptR Still I C8_l ^ND ililRtQtJtRtMtNrs ot Tilf clTy. sil t ^NDsc^pr ^NI) ^R(;iltTrCTUR^l pt ANS t ()R ANy ^DD¡ltoNAt I i^RDsc^pt ^ppt tc^Tta)NS 6. t1[ (It ANI) Iilt (]ONStRUcilON rN(;tNf¡R Slt^u Bt NOIilfi¡l ^ì il^St 48llOLiRS PRIOR TO ^Ny WORK WlTlilN TilI STRilT RtCill Or \¡V^y (StDtW^tK. STRIIT OR DRIVIWAYS) 7. MTNNIS()r^ 5t^tL St^ttJU. RLQtljRt.s NOliltc^iloN pLR "GOptiR SI^tr ()Nt(]AI Itr PRIOR IO (]OMMI N(:IN(; ANY (;RAI)IN(;, IXCAVAIION OR UNI)I,RGROL'ND WORK- L S[f CONÌR^(iTSp[Clltc^TtoNs toR^NyR[MO!ît DIT^|ts_ 9, ANY SICN OR IIXIT¡RIS RI MOVID WIIII IN IIII RICI II OI WAY OR AS PARI OI ¡I iIsilr woRK silA¡l 8t Rtpt^ctD By ¡Ht (ìoNìRACIOR tN ^(:CORD^NCI W¡[l il[{ltY Rt(ltJtRt\1tNts IIt ((iN]R^( I()tì sil^il t,Rts¡R\t ^NI) N14tNt^tN ^NyI XJSIIN( i SIRIIT t I(JHfS AND TRATfIC SI(;N5 P{:R IHf RTQIIIRIMt'NTS Of THF (] TY. ]0.(]LARANI)(ìRUBANf)RIMOVI.ALI IRI-TS.VIGI-IAIIONANDSITI, I)IBRISPKIORIO(ìR^D|NG. Ail RtMOVID MATLRI^| Sil^Lt Bf H^Util) tROM lHt StIt D^tty. ^il(]TARIN(ì ANI) CRIIBBINC ANI] R|MOVAIS SIIAII 8T PTRTORMID PI:R TIItCONTRACT SPI'CI|ICAT¡ONS TROSION CONTROI MTASIJRI'S SI IAI I Bt IMMTDIATTI YtsT^BltsHtD tJp()N RIMOV^j. (SEf SHf[T C]_l) r !. ll tt CoNtRAcroR st i^il Bt_ Rf QtJtRtD IO OBI^tN ^LL p[RMilS I ROM ìilt ( ily ^5RLQUTRI f ) IOR ^t I WORK Wl¡ I I il fl S¡ RLil ^NI) ptJBUC RtGl I OI W^y. r 2 ^ st(iN¡flc^NT pr)RlIoN or stTt ¡MPROVIMtN]S NO-r St |OWN ON l ilS St il I I ^R[DISCRIBFD AND PRO\4DFD IN TIJRTHIR DI]AII ON THI RCHITICTURAI ANDLANt)S(i^pt pt-^Ns. IH¡stN0tJUtStANt)sc^ptN(ì, It(;tItNG^NDOIIttRf tXttJRts. 13. 8612 CONCRilt QJRB ^NIl (;UI[R Sil^lt Bt tNStAt¡l:lf ^t Iilt []GI ot AltCOMMON DRIVI S ÁND PARKIN(; IOTS ¡4- CONSIRIJCìION NOìI S: A, PII)I.SIRIAN RAMPS SIIAI.T BI, PROV¡I)LI) AI IIIL LOCATIONS SIIOWN AND ASsilowN pLR ll fi I ^Nt)SC^pt SlIt ptANs. I]. TIIT CONTRA(JIOR SIIAIT SAW-CUT BJTUMINOIJS AND CONCRTTT PAVIMTNTS ^s RfQUtR[D ptR THI Sp[Ctr¡C^loNs. R¡Mov[ IX|ST|NC CtJRfJ ^ND CTJTT¡R ^NDtNSt^il tì6t8 (ON( Rt ICtiRB^ND(;titTuR. I 5. Sil St til IS (::t-l ANt) c4-l I oR cRADtN(ì ^ND tJ ¡ il il il S. I6. AIT CONCRIII. CTJRB AND (;UIILR 86I2, Û]Y'S SIANI)ARD P¡AItS. {Stt I)t]A¡¡- sl t[.t). | 7. Tt I tNTtNT Ot Ï tt pRopostD CONSTRUO|ON tS TO pRtStRVt ^S Mti(;ti ol ¡lilTXISTIN(; S]RTII PAVIMTNT AS POSSIBLT, AND 10 MII I AND OVIRLAY. RIMOVI DPAVTMTNT ARIAS Nf] PATCHIN(ì SHATI B[ INSTAII[D PtR PAVIMINI SIL]IONPROV|t)tt) PLR Dtì^tt stitt_l PA\4.MTN I *ìLñ Er5 _\s * ") U òI ÈgÀ si2 ci o5 g f (r) $x.oh 07!14t15 o8r,1 0r,1 5 08/19:15 09./08,,i 5 a9 i25!15 1 0./Õ9,1 5 32/1a!i5 01 /29/16 04i27 ti 6 05/27/16 05/27 il 6 CITY SUBMIIÍAL CIry RE-SUBlVITTAL CITY RE-SUBIVJTfAL CIry RE.5lJBÌüITTAI CIlY RE.SUBIVITIAL ctil cot\,lúËNTs DESIGN DEVELOPNlENT 1O0% DD Dôcùments Site A 100% DD Docunre^ts Site A HUD Review Respons€ ltens 100% cD,s t) !) i I ' l . i: l, I l l il lÌ li l I l I fra.6)..ai 1l¡i r; ! ùLr, nc I a^ ; .trr :..rrec t,¡:.5r ¡1'l a-q,??, u"¡q ìhcÞirc,:f.sãr ôfM uos.5qk Date 49933 05/27/2O16 loucks P¡ojecl No. D¡¿h,n By Checked By 1 51 8óA FJD PJD PJD @ EX'STING CONDITIONS SITE PLAN GRADING PLAN ilrar/ f/¡r eP .o:i un:\ ¡iila \r Lc\ Pia\ SANIIARY & WATERMAIN STORM SEWËR DETAILS CITY DETAILS LANDSCAPE PLAN ÎREE INVENTORY PLAN c1.1 c2.1 c32 c3.4 c4.1 c4.2 c8.1 c¿.2 11.1 L2.1 IRIAN Copher State One Call TWIN CI-IY AREA| 65t-454-0002 TOLL FREE| l-800-252-il66 WARNING: ìltL coNIRACIOR SHAil Uf RtspoNstBtt IoR (i^utN(ì f()R toc^iloNs ul ^¡tIXISTINC UTIIIfITS. TIII]Y SIIATL COOPTRAft WITII AII IJTIIITY COMPANIIS INMAtNt^tNtN(j It iLtR sIR\4(:t_ ^Nt) / OR RLLö(j^t loN ot ItNts. IilI CONTR^CIOR Sti^il (:ONt^CI (;Ot'titR st^tt oNt cAil ^l 651,454_OOO2 ^lIt^sï 48 ilOURS tN ^DV NCt-FOR T¡tt lOC,{TtoNs ot ^Lt UNDTRGROUND WlRt-S,CABI [S, CONDUIIS. PIPIS, MANHOI IS, VAI VIS OR OIHIR BURIID SIRIJCTURFS tsI I ORII)I(;(;IN(ì. IIIt (]ONIRA(:IOR SIIAI-T RLPAIR OR RI.PIACL IIIt ÀBOVÍ: WIILN I]AMAULI) IJTJRIN(ì (:ONSIRTJCIION AI NOCOSI IO ]IIL OWNLR. tSth Lane4{f'rl I .13ô Wesrv,¡cc - iirs RaoC SITE A e*agtoa Row Âpartmeats West Tereg Âve Sita A 9L Lorts rêrk, Mfi¡ 96 (2s) 4.9 PROPOSED BUILDING RAMP 3 St^tRS ^RCHtT[(-Tl iR^r STÁIRS SFI BIKf s I ()R^Gt (5) C()N(:R{ It PAIIOS wtT¡t s(;RttN w^tt. STI ARCI IITI CTIJRAI CON(ìRI:TI: stDt-w^t K IYP. PARKINC st(ìN 2 ST^tRS Sff ^RC¡ ilIICt tJR^t PROPOSED BUILDING FFE:9 1 9.5 wTil scRttN w^tI stI ARct ilf[clJRAt 5t^tRs stf ' 6.8 ilTICTURAI ^RCHtT[(ì1]R^r {5) CONCRftt slD[w^tK .9 lt. R8.0 ¡YP, - ]E Lot2s.6 ----i 1o.o --1---- 25.¡ ---J-- 16.¡ I 8.5 8.8 5.0 8.5 R3.0 R3.0 24.0 I I I I-l IR12.0 R3.0 (7J BIKI st^¡ ^cCtss[tLtPARKINC st(;N BItiMtNotJs PAVI MTNI R3.0 lltTtiMtNous t)^vtMtNt 18) B¡KI sl^t ts R3.0 I,*^^-..'t_..,' 'rl ì-^. --. I ì '"1 I lNct osti Rt & Rt (-Y(t t IIT¡CTtJRAt WALLS IO M^ tCt I stt lWcorucrrrr PAVTMTNI WI II I l 'tlH ilND lvolr,,'no Inrurruruc SITE PLAN c2.1 15.6 2t9.41 .1''// '--Iir City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8g) Title: Arlington Row West Plat Revision and First Reading Major PUD Amendment Page 15 SCALE IN FEET 0 30 N LOUCKS KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Arlington Row, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, fee owner of the following described property situated in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, to wit: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 5, Township 117 North, Range 21 West, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence South 89 degrees 57 minutes 27 seconds East (assumed bearing), along the north line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, a distance of 198.00 feet; thence South 2 degrees 29 minutes 51 seconds West a distance of 4.15 feet to the intersection with a line drawn 50.00 feet southerly of and parallel with the following described “Line A”, said point of intersection being the point of beginning of the parcel to be described, which point is marked by a Judicial Landmark set pursuant to Torrens Case No. 16472; thence South 2 degrees 46 minutes 47 seconds East a distance of 325.86 feet, to a point marked by a Judicial Landmark set pursuant to Torrens Case No. 16472; thence easterly, parallel with the north line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, a distance of 155.84 feet, to a point marked by a Judicial Landmark set pursuant to Torrens Case No. 16964; thence continue easterly, parallel with the north line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, a distance of 63.60 feet, to the west line of that portion of Texas Avenue as dedicated in JOHNSON'S AND BRANT'S ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, said Hennepin County; thence North 0 degrees 57 minutes 27 seconds West, along said west line of that portion of Texas Avenue and its northerly extension, a distance of 280.80 feet, to the intersection with a line drawn 50.00 feet southerly of and parallel with the following described “Line A”; thence northwesterly 235.64 feet, along said parallel line, being an 843.94 foot radius non-tangential curve, concave to the northeast, having a central angle of 15 degrees 59 minutes 52 seconds, the chord of said curve is 234.88 feet in length and bears North 78 degrees 59 minutes 01 seconds West, to the point of beginning and there terminating. “Line A” is described as beginning at the northeast corner of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 5; thence westerly, along the north line of said Southwest Quarter, a distance of 2421.40 feet; thence northwesterly a distance of 484.58 feet along a tangential curve, concave to the north, having a radius of 793.94 feet and a central angle of 34 degrees 58 minutes 15 seconds and said “Line A” there terminating. Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as ARLINGTON ROW APARTMENTS WEST, and does hereby dedicate to the public for public use forever the public ways and the easements for drainage and utility purposes as shown on this plat. In witness whereof said Arlington Row, LLC has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this ______ day of ____________________, 201_____. ARLINGTON ROW, LLC ____________________________________ (Signature) ____________________________________ (Title) State of ______________ County of ______________ This instrument was acknowledged before me this _________ day of ________________________, 201_____ by _________________________________, ________________________________ of Arlington Row, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. _________________________________________ (Signature) _________________________________________ (Printed Name) Notary Public ____________________ County, _______________ My Commission Expires January 31, 20_____ SURVEYORS CERTIFICATION I, Paul J. McGinley, do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. Dated this ______ day of __________________, 201____ __________________________________ Paul J. McGinley, Licensed Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 26724 State of Minnesota County of Hennepin This instrument was acknowledged before me this ______ day of __________________, 201_____ by Paul J. McGinley, a Licensed Land Surveyor. _________________________________________ (Signature) _________________________________________ (Printed Name) Notary Public Hennepin County, Minnesota My Commission Expires January 31, 2020 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA This plat of ARLINGTON ROW APARTMENTS WEST was approved and accepted by the City Council of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, at a regular meeting thereof held this ______ day of _________________, 201_____. If applicable, the written comments and recommendations of the Commissioner of Transportation and the County Highway Engineer have been received by the City or the prescribed 30 day period has elapsed without receipt of such comments and recommendations, as provided by Minn. Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. CITY COUNCIL OF ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA By: __________________________________, Mayor By: __________________________________, Manager RESIDENT AND REAL ESTATE SERVICES, Hennepin County, Minnesota I hereby certify that taxes payable in 201____ and prior years have been paid for land described on this plat, dated this ____________ day of _________________________, 201_____. Mark V. Chapin, Hennepin County Auditor By: ___________________________________, Deputy SURVEY DIVISION, Hennepin County, Minnesota Pursuant to MN. STAT. Sec. 383B.565 (1969) this plat has been approved this ________ day of __________________________, 201_____. Chris F. Mavis, Hennepin County Surveyor By: ____________________________________ REGISTRAR OF TITLES, Hennepin County, Minnesota I hereby certify that the within plat of PLAT NAME was filed in this office this _______ day of _________________, 20___, at ______ o'clock ____ .M. Martin McCormick, Registrar of Titles By: ____________________________________, Deputy City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8g) Title: Arlington Row West Plat Revision and First Reading Major PUD Amendment Page 16 18.025.018.0 8.08.5 MODULAR RETAINING WALL MODULAR RETAINING WALL WITH RAILING WHERE WALL IS 30" OR TALLER BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK TYP. (5) CONCRETE PATIOS WITH SCREEN WALL. SEE ARCHITECTURAL (5) CONCRETE PATIOS WITH SCREEN WALL. SEE ARCHITECTURAL CONCRETE SIDEWALK TYP. CONCRETE SIDEWALK TYP. CONCRETE PAVEMENT TRASH & RECYCLE ENCLOSURE W/CONCRETE PAVEMENT WITH MASONRY WALLS TO MATCH BUILDING. SEE ARCHITECTURAL 3 STAIRS 2 STAIRS 2 STAIRS SEE ARCHITECTURAL 2 STAIRS SEE ARCHITECTURAL 2 STAIRS SEE ARCHITECTURAL 2 STAIRS SEE ARCHITECTURAL PEDESTRIAN RAMP PEDESTRIAN RAMP BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 8.5 18.0 24.0 18.0 8.5 8.0 (7) BIKE STALLS (25) INTERIOR BIKE STORAGE (8) BIKE STALLS CONNECT SIDEWALK TO EXISTING PEDESTRIAN RAMP PEDESTRIAN RAMP 9.7 14.6 12.6 17.8 19.0 38.4 6.0 6.0 6' TALL CEDAR FENCE 1' BEHIND RETAINING WALL 6.0 5.0 5.0 6.8 11.1 4.0 11.8 13.2 R3.0 R3.0 R12.0 R3.0 R3.0 R3.0 R3.0 R8.0 R8.0 13.3 45.6 200.0 5.7 25.6 23.4 10.8 5.0 5.0 9.6 17.2 17.9 6.8 6.8 9.1 4.9 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN SOLAR CANOPY COLUMN. COORDINATE FOOTING LOCATION WITH CURB & GUTTER. 28.1 13.7 07/06/16 City PUD Amendment 07/06/16 - City PUD Amendment LOUCKS W:\2015\15186.0A\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\C2-1 SITE PLANPlotted: 06 /30 / 2016 8:12 AM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. CADD QUALIFICATION SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL Arlington Row Apartments West Texas Ave Site A St. Louis Park, MN Melrose Company 22375 Murray Street Excelsior, MN 55331 07/10/15 CITY SUBMITTAL 08/10/15 CITY RE-SUBMITTAL 08/19/15 CITY RE-SUBMITTAL 09/08/15 CITY RE-SUBMITTAL 09/25/15 CITY RE-SUBMITTAL 10/09/15 CITY COMMENTS 12/18/15 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 01/29/16 100% DD Documents Site A 04/27/16 100% DD Documents Site A 05/27/16 HUD Review Response Items 05/27/16 100% CD's C1.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C2.1 SITE PLAN C3.1 GRADING PLAN C3.2 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C3.3 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C3.4 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C4.1 SANITARY & WATERMAIN C4.2 STORM SEWER C8.1 DETAILS C8.2 CITY DETAILS L1.1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2.1 TREE INVENTORY PLAN HUD Project # 092-35807 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. PJ Disch - PE 49933 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. 07/06/2016 15186A PJD PJD PJD N  WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. SITE PLAN GENERAL NOTES 1.MINIMUM SETBACKS: FRONT BUILDING SETBACK = 13 FT. SIDE BUILDING SETBACK = 10 FT. REAR BUILDING SETBACK = 9 FT. 2.ZONING EXISTING ZONING =R-1 PROPOSED ZONING = PUD 3. PARKING SUMMARY BIKE COUNT SUMMARY SURFACE REGULAR STALLS = 49 1 PER DWELLING = 34 SURFACE HANDICAPPED STALLS = 3 1 PER 10 PARKING STALLS = 6 TOTAL SURFACE STALLS = 52 TOTAL REQUIRED = 40 BIKE STALLS INSIDE = 25 BIKE STALLS OUTSIDE = 15 TOTAL PROPOSED = 40 4. AREA/DENSITY TOTAL AREA = 57,339 SQ.FT. OR 1.316 AC. IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA = 34,647 SQ.FT. OR 0.795 AC. = 60.4% PERVIOUS SURFACE AREA = 22,692 SQ.FT. OR 0.521 AC. = 39.6% 5. ALL PAVING, CONCRETE CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DETAILS SHOWN PER SHEET C8-1 AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. SEE LANDSCAPE AND ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR ANY ADDITIONAL HARDSCAPE APPLICATIONS. 6. THE CITY AND THE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY WORK WITHIN THE STREET RIGHT OF WAY (SIDEWALK, STREET OR DRIVEWAYS) 7. MINNESOTA STATE STATUTE REQUIRES NOTIFICATION PER "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY GRADING, EXCAVATION OR UNDERGROUND WORK. 8. SEE CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS FOR ANY REMOVAL DETAILS. 9. ANY SIGN OR FIXTURES REMOVED WITH IN THE RIGHT OF WAY OR AS PART OF THE SITE WORK SHALL BE REPLACED BY THE CONTRACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY REQUIREMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PRESERVE AND MAINTAIN ANY EXISTING STREET LIGHTS AND TRAFFIC SIGNS PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. 10. CLEAR AND GRUB AND REMOVE ALL TREES, VEGETATION AND SITE DEBRIS PRIOR TO GRADING. ALL REMOVED MATERIAL SHALL BE HAULED FROM THE SITE DAILY. ALL CLEARING AND GRUBBING AND REMOVALS SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY ESTABLISHED UPON REMOVAL. (SEE SHEET C3-1) 11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO OBTAIN ALL PERMITS FROM THE CITY AS REQUIRED FOR ALL WORK WITH THE STREET AND PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. 12. A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF SITE IMPROVEMENTS NOT SHOWN ON THIS SHEET ARE DESCRIBED AND PROVIDED IN FURTHER DETAIL ON THE ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPE PLANS. THIS INCLUDES LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND OTHER FIXTURES. 13. B612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE EDGE OF ALL COMMON DRIVES AND PARKING LOTS. 14. CONSTRUCTION NOTES: A. PEDESTRIAN RAMPS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE LOCATIONS SHOWN AND AS SHOWN PER THE LANDSCAPE SITE PLANS. B. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SAW-CUT BITUMINOUS AND CONCRETE PAVEMENTS AS REQUIRED PER THE SPECIFICATIONS. REMOVE EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER AND INSTALL B618 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER. 15. SEE SHEETS C3-1 AND C4-1 FOR GRADING AND UTILITIES. 16. ALL CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER B612, CITY'S STANDARD PLATES. (SEE DETAIL SHEET). 17. THE INTENT OF THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION IS TO PRESERVE AS MUCH OF THE EXISTING STREET PAVEMENT AS POSSIBLE, AND TO MILL AND OVERLAY. REMOVED PAVEMENT AREAS AND PATCHING SHALL BE INSTALLED PER PAVEMENT SECTION PROVIDED PER DETAIL SHEET. PAVEMENT LEGEND: CONCRETE PAVEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK SITE PLAN C2.1 SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 SITE A City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8g) Title: Arlington Row West Plat Revision and First Reading Major PUD Amendment Page 17   2 AH 4 FD 4 DW 4 DH 4 FD 3 GF 6 SD 6 FD 6 DH 6 DW 6 FD 3 TY 6 KG 5 LL 4 AH 5 KG 7 AH 8 KG 9 AH 6 KG 2 SH 3 AH 4 AP 2 IL 1 BO 3 BS 15 SJ 1 BO7 GS 3 SH 4 GS 7 SD 9 FD 1 IL 1 BO 3 BS 3 TH 3 PC 3 AH 5 AP 1 VE 5 GF 8 KG 3 GF 12 SD 4 GS 1 BO 8 SD 10 DW 9 AH 17 SD 3 AH 10 GF 11 SD 9 BH 4 DH 2 GS 3 GS 7 DH 8 BH 3 GS 6 DH 3 BH 1 VE 05/27/16 - 100% CD's LOUCKS W:\2015\15186.0A\CADD DATA\LANDSCAPE\_dwg Sheet Files\L1-1Plotted: 06 /27 / 2016 4:7 PM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. CADD QUALIFICATION SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL Arlington Row Apartments West Texas Ave Site A St. Louis Park, MN Melrose Company 22375 Murray Street Excelsior, MN 55331 07/10/15 CITY SUBMITTAL 08/10/15 CITY RE-SUBMITTAL 08/19/15 CITY RE-SUBMITTAL 09/08/15 CITY RE-SUBMITTAL 09/25/15 CITY RE-SUBMITTAL 10/09/15 CITY COMMENTS 12/18/15 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 01/29/16 100% DD Documents Site A 04/27/16 100% DD Documents Site A 05/27/16 HUD Review Response Items 05/27/16 100% CD's C1.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C2.1 SITE PLAN C3.1 GRADING PLAN C3.2 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C3.3 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C3.4 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C4.1 SANITARY & WATERMAIN C4.2 STORM SEWER C8.1 DETAILS C8.2 CITY DETAILS L1.1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2.1 TREE INVENTORY PLAN HUD Project # 092-35807 GENERAL NOTES CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT SITE PRIOR TO SUBMITTING BID. HE SHALL INSPECT SITE AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS RELATING TO THE NATURE AND SCOPE OF WORK. VERIFY LAYOUT AND ANY DIMENSIONS SHOWN AND BRING TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ANY DISCREPANCIES WHICH MAY COMPROMISE THE DESIGN AND/OR INTENT OF THE PROJECT'S LAYOUT. ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE WORK OR MATERIALS SUPPLIED. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL EXISTING ROADS, CURBS/GUTTERS, TRAILS, TREES, LAWNS AND SITE ELEMENTS DURING PLANTING OPERATIONS. ANY DAMAGE TO SAME SHALL BE REPAIRED AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALIGNMENT AND LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND AND ABOVE GRADE UTILITIES AND PROVIDE THE NECESSARY PROTECTION FOR SAME BEFORE CONSTRUCTION / MATERIAL INSTALLATION BEGINS (MINIMUM 10' - 0" CLEARANCE). ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHALL BE LAID SO THAT TRENCHES DO NOT CUT THROUGH ROOT SYSTEMS OF ANY EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN. EXISTING CONTOURS, TRAILS, VEGETATION, CURB/GUTTER AND OTHER EXISTING ELEMENTS BASED UPON INFORMATION SUPPLIED TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BY OTHERS. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ANY AND ALL DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF SAME. THE ALIGNMENT AND GRADES OF THE PROPOSED WALKS, TRAILS AND/OR ROADWAYS ARE SUBJECT TO FIELD ADJUSTMENT REQUIRED TO CONFORM TO LOCALIZED TOPOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS AND TO MINIMIZE TREE REMOVAL AND GRADING. ANY CHANGE IN ALIGNMENT MUST BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION: COORDINATE THE PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION AND PLANTING INSTALLATION WITH OTHER CONTRACTORS WORKING ON SITE. NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL COMPLETE GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. WHERE SOD/SEED ABUTS PAVED SURFACES, FINISHED GRADE OF SOD/SEED SHALL BE HELD 1" BELOW SURFACE ELEVATION OF TRAIL, SLAB, CURB, ETC. SEED ALL AREAS DISTURBED DUE TO GRADING OTHER THAN THOSE AREAS NOTED TO RECEIVE SOD. SEED SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MULCHED AS PER MNDOT SPECS. SOD ALL DESIGNATED AREAS DISTURBED DUE TO GRADING. SOD SHALL BE LAID PARALLEL TO THE CONTOURS AND SHALL HAVE STAGGERED JOINTS. ON SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 OR IN DRAINAGE SWALES, THE SOD SHALL BE STAKED TO THE GROUND. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, ALL SHRUBS SHALL HAVE AT LEAST 5 CANES AT THE SPECIFIED MINIMUM SHRUB HEIGHT OR WIDTH. ORNAMENTAL TREES SHALL HAVE NO V CROTCHES AND SHALL BEGIN BRANCHING NO LOWER THAN 3' ABOVE ROOT BALL. STREET AND BOULEVARD TREES SHALL BEGIN BRANCHING NO LOWER THAN 5' ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. ANY CONIFEROUS TREE PREVIOUSLY PRUNED FOR CHRISTMAS TREE SALES SHALL NOT BE USED. ALL CONIFEROUS TREES SHALL BE FULL FORM, NATURAL TO THE SPECIES, WITHOUT PRUNING. PLAN TAKES PRECEDENCE OVER PLANT SCHEDULE IF DISCREPANCIES IN QUANTITIES EXIST. SPECIFICATIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER NOTES. NO PLANT MATERIAL SUBSTITUTIONS WILL BE ACCEPTED UNLESS APPROVAL IS REQUESTED OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF A BID AND/OR QUOTATION. ALL PROPOSED PLANTS SHALL BE LOCATED AND STAKED AS SHOWN ON PLAN. ADJUSTMENTS IN LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLANT MATERIALS MAY BE NEEDED IN FIELD. SHOULD AN ADJUSTMENT BE ADVISED, THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST BE NOTIFIED. ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE FERTILIZED UPON INSTALLATION WITH A 27-3-3 SLOW RELEASE FERTILIZER MIXED IN WITH THE PLANTING SOIL PER THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. PLANTS MAY BE TREATED FOR SUMMER AND FALL INSTALLATION WITH AN APPLICATION OF GRANULAR 27-3-3 AT 6 OZ PER 2.5" CALIPER PER TREE AND 3 OZ PER SHRUB WITH AN ADDITIONAL APPLICATION OF 27-3-3 THE FOLLOWING SPRING IN THE TREE SAUCER. ALL PLANTING AREAS RECEIVING GROUND COVER, PERENNIALS, ANNUALS, AND/OR VINES SHALL RECEIVE A MINIMUM OF 12" DEPTH OF PLANTING SOIL CONSISTING OF AT LEAST 45 PARTS TOPSOIL, 45 PARTS PEAT OR MANURE AND 10 PARTS SAND. ALL PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER PLANTING DETAILS. REMOVE ALL FLAGGING AND LABELS FROM PLANTS. WRAPPING MATERIAL SHALL BE CORRUGATED PVC PIPING 1" GREATER IN CALIPER THAN THE TREE BEING PROTECTED OR QUALITY, HEAVY, WATERPROOF CREPE PAPER MANUFACTURED FOR THIS PURPOSE. WRAP ALL DECIDUOUS TREES PLANTED IN THE FALL PRIOR TO 12-1 AND REMOVE ALL WRAPPING AFTER 5-1. BLACK METAL EDGER TO BE USED TO CONTAIN SHRUBS, PERENNIALS, AND ANNUALS WHERE BED MEETS SOD/SEED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. ALL ANNUAL AND PERENNIAL PLANTING BEDS TO RECEIVE 3" DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH WITH NO WEED BARRIER. ALL SHRUB BED MASSINGS TO RECEIVE 3" DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH AND FIBER MAT WEED BARRIER. ALL TREES TO RECEIVE 4" DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH WITH NO MULCH IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH TREE TRUNK. SPREAD GRANULAR PRE EMERGENT HERBICIDE (PREEN OR EQUAL) PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS UNDER ALL MULCHED AREAS. MAINTENANCE STRIPS TO HAVE EDGER AND MULCH AS SPECIFIED/INDICATED ON DRAWING OR IN SPECIFICATION. IF THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS CONCERNED OR PERCEIVES ANY DEFICIENCIES IN THE PLANT SELECTIONS, SOIL CONDITIONS OR ANY OTHER SITE CONDITION WHICH MIGHT NEGATIVELY AFFECT PLANT ESTABLISHMENT, SURVIVAL OR GUARANTEE, HE MUST BRING THESE DEFICIENCIES TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO PROCUREMENT AND/OR INSTALLATION. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A WRITTEN REQUEST FOR THE OWNER ACCEPTANCE INSPECTION OF ALL LANDSCAPE AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ON-GOING MAINTENANCE OF ALL NEWLY INSTALLED MATERIALS UNTIL TIME OF OWNER ACCEPTANCE. ANY ACTS OF VANDALISM OR DAMAGE WHICH MAY OCCUR PRIOR TO OWNER ACCEPTANCE SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH A MAINTENANCE PROGRAM INCLUDING, BUT NOT NECESSARILY LIMITED TO, PRUNING, FERTILIZATION AND DISEASE/PEST CONTROL. CONTRACTOR SHALL GUARANTEE NEW PLANT MATERIAL THROUGH ONE CALENDAR YEAR FROM THE DATE OF OWNER ACCEPTANCE. WARRANTY (ONE FULL GROWING SEASON) FOR LANDSCAPE MATERIALS SHALL BEGIN ON THE DATE OF ACCEPTANCE BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AFTER THE COMPLETION OF PLANTING OF ALL LANDSCAPE MATERIALS. NO PARTIAL ACCEPTANCE WILL BE CONSIDERED. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE THE APPROPRIATE DATES FOR SPRING PLANT MATERIAL INSTALLATION AND SEED/SOD PLACEMENT IS FROM THE TIME GROUND HAS THAWED TO JUNE 15. FALL SODDING IS GENERALLY ACCEPTABLE FROM AUGUST 15 - NOVEMBER 1. FALL SEEDING FROM AUGUST 15 - SEPTEMBER 15; DORMANT SEEDING IN THE FALL SHALL NOT OCCUR PRIOR TO NOVEMBER 1. FALL CONIFEROUS PLANTING MAY OCCUR FROM AUGUST 15 - OCTOBER 1 AND DECIDUOUS PLANTING FROM THE FIRST FROST UNTIL NOVEMBER 15. PLANTING OUTSIDE THESE DATES IS NOT RECOMMENDED. ANY ADJUSTMENT MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. PROTECT ALL EXISTING OAKS ON SITE SCHEDULED TO REMAIN. IF EXISTING OAKS ARE DAMAGED IN ANY MANNER, ABOVE OR BELOW GROUND IN THE ROOT SYSTEM, AN ASPHALTIC TREE PRUNING PAINT SHOULD BE APPLIED IMMEDIATELY AFTER WOUNDING. OAKS ARE NOT TO BE PRUNED, REMOVED OR TRANSPLANTED BETWEEN APRIL 15 AND JULY 1. NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IF THESE DATES ARE UNAVOIDABLE. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL ESTABLISH TO HIS SATISFACTION THAT SOIL AND COMPACTION CONDITIONS ARE ADEQUATE TO ALLOW FOR PROPER DRAINAGE AT AND AROUND THE BUILDING SITE. IRRIGATION NOTES: VERIFY EXISTING/PROPOSED IRRIGATION SYSTEM LAYOUT AND CONFIRM COMPLETE LIMITS OF IRRIGATION PRIOR TO SUPPLYING SHOP DRAWINGS. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AN IRRIGATION LAYOUT PLAN AND SPECIFICATION AS A PART OF THE SCOPE OF WORK WHEN BIDDING. THESE SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO ORDER AND/OR INSTALLATION. IT SHALL BE THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO INSURE THAT ALL SODDED/SEEDED AND PLANTED AREAS ARE IRRIGATED PROPERLY, INCLUDING THOSE AREAS DIRECTLY AROUND AND ABUTTING BUILDING FOUNDATION. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH AN IRRIGATION SCHEDULE APPROPRIATE TO THE PROJECT SITE CONDITIONS AND TO PLANT MATERIAL GROWTH REQUIREMENTS. IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS NOT TO SPRINKLE ACROSS PAVEMENT. THE SYSTEM SHALL INCORPORATE A RAIN SENSOR INTO IRRIGATION SYSTEM. PLANTINGS OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF IRRIGATION ARE TO BE WATERED REGULARLY UNTIL PLANTING/SOD/SEED HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. N Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Timothy J. Fedie - LA 48303 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.15186A MJS TJF TJF LANDSCAPE PLAN L1.1 PLANT SCHEDULE: LANDSCAPE PLAN: LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS: 1 TREE PER UNIT (25% MUST BE DECIDUOUS AND 25% MUST BE CONIFEROUS) 6 SHRUBS PER 1,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA PROPOSED UNITS = 34 GROSS FLOOR AREA = 29,600 SF TREES REQUIRED = 34 TREES PROPOSED = 16 OVERSTORY, 15 CONIFEROUS, 9 ORNAMENTAL EXISTING TREES = 15 TOTAL TREES ON-SITE IN AFTER CONDITION= 54 SHRUBS REQUIRED = 178 SHRUBS PROPOSED = 178 TREE MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS = 129 CALIPER INCHES DECIDUOUS TREES PROPOSED = 81.5 CALIPER INCHES CONIFEROUS TREES PROPOSED = 49.5 CALIPER INCHES (8'x.415) TOTAL PROPOSED = 131 CALIPER INCHES DORA CALCULATIONS: SITE AREA = 60,871 SQ.FT. DORA REQUIRED (12% OF SITE AREA) = 7,305 SQ.FT. DORA PROPOSED = 7,350 SQ.FT. OR 12% (MARKED ON PLAN WITH HATCH) PLANTING DETAILS: SITE A City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8g) Title: Arlington Row West Plat Revision and First Reading Major PUD Amendment Page 18 City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8g) Title: Arlington Row West Plat Revision and First Reading Major PUD AmendmentPage 19 HSS STEEL TUBE GALV & PAINTED, BY SOLAR CONTRACTOR 16" CAST IN PLACE PIER WITH RUBBED FINISH AND SLOPED TOP 24" CAST IN PLACE PIER HOLD 6' BELOW FINISH GRADE CAST IN PLACE FOOTING STEEL COLUMN BOLTED TO PIER AND ENCASED IN CONCRETE 18' - 0" PARKING STALL DEPTH SEE MANUF DRAWINGSMIN 8' - 6" CLEARFROM PARKING STALL OPEN END MIN 2' - 0" SEE MANUF DRAWINGS NOTE: •ALL DIMENSION AND MEMBER SIZE SHOWN FOR DESIGN INTENT •SOLAR CANOPY INSTALLER TO PROVIDE ENGINEERED DRAWINGS •ALL EXTERIOR STEEL TO BE GALVANIZED AND PAINTED 6"FINISH GRADE - SEE CIVIL FINISH GRADE3' - 0" ABOVE TOP OF PIER SLOPE DIRECTION SHOWN TYPICAL - INSTALLER TO VERIFY AND COORDINATE FACING TO OPTIMIZE PRODUCTION EFFICIENCY 10°BOLTED CONNECTION CAR "BASH BAR" ICE / SNOW GUARD 8' - 6"1' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"1' - 6"8' - 6"0"8' - 6"8' - 6"1' - 6"8' - 6"0"8' - 6"8' - 6"1' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"1' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"1' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"9" 1 AS1.5 27' - 0"27' - 0"27' - 0"27' - 0"27' - 0"27' - 0"12' - 0"12' - 0"162' - 0" 27' - 0"27' - 0"27' - 0" 9"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"1' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"1' - 6"8' - 0"8' - 0"8' - 6" 27' - 0"27' - 0"27' - 0" 81' - 0"12' - 0"12' - 0"27' - 0"27' - 0"27' - 0"0"9"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"1' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"1' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"9" 27' - 0"27' - 0"27' - 0" 81' - 0"12' - 0"12' - 0"elness swenson graham architects 500 washington avenue south m inneapolis m innesota 55415 p. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 5 0 8 f. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 3 8 2 w w w . e s g a r c h . c o m I h ereby certify that this plan, specification, or r e p o r t was prepared by m e or under m y direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of M innesota Signature Typed or Printed Nam e License # D ate PROJECT NUM BER D RAW N BY CHECKED BY O R I GINAL ISSUE: R E V ISIO NS KEY P L AN N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T IO N **D R A F T ** H UD PRO JECT NUM BER 6/29/2016 2:14:45 PMA S 1 .5 S OL AR CANOPY 2 1 5 515 M E C he cker 7 /6 /2016 A R L INGTON ROW A RL INGTON ROW S T . LO UIS PARK, M N 5 /2 7/2016 - 100% C D 's 0 9 2 -35807 No. D es cription Date 2 7/6/2016 - City PUD Am endm ent 7/6/2016 1/4" = 1'-0"AS1.5 1 Solar Canopy 1/8" = 1'-0"AS1.5 A1 Solar Canopy A - 1 1/8" = 1'-0"AS1.5 B2 Solar Canopy B - 2 1/8" = 1'-0"AS1.5 B1 Solar Canopy B - 1 2 Solar Arrays B1 3 Bays @ 27' OC (60 Panels) 5 x 13 B2 3 Bays @ 27' OC (60 Panels) 5 x 13 A1 6 Bays @ 27' OC (135 Panels) 5 x 27 12" = 1'-0"AS1.5 2 Solar Canopy City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8g) Title: Arlington Row West Plat Revision and First Reading Major PUD Amendment Page 20 Melrose Company LLC ARLINGTON ROW St Louis Park MN Neighborhood Meeting - Solar 2016 July 22 SITE PLAN City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8g) Title: Arlington Row West Plat Revision and First Reading Major PUD Amendment Page 21 Melrose Company LLC ARLINGTON ROW St Louis Park MN Neighborhood Meeting - Solar 2016 July 22 View from Texas Avenue LOOKING SOUTH City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8g) Title: Arlington Row West Plat Revision and First Reading Major PUD Amendment Page 22 Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: August 15, 2016 Action Agenda Item: 8h EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Arlington Row East Planned Unit Development (PUD) Major Amendment RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to approve First Reading of an Ordinance amending Chapter 32 of the City Code relating to Arlington Row East Planned Unit Development, and set the Second Reading for September 6, 2016. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Should the City allow solar panel installations above carports for the Arlington Row East project? SUMMARY: Melrose Company has submitted an application for a major amendment to the PUD for Arlington Row East to add solar installations designed to be located above carports in the parking lot. Arlington Row East is located at 7705 Wayzata Blvd (North of 13th Lane). The developer is requesting a major amendment to the PUD for Arlington Row East to incorporate a 40kw solar powered electrical installation that will be constructed above carport structures located in the eastern portion of the parking lot. This amendment is a major amendment to the Arlington Row East PUD. A public hearing before the Planning Commission was held August 3, 2016. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the amendment with a 4-0 vote. The unofficial meeting minutes are attached. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: None VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a leader in environmental stewardship. We will increase environmental consciousness and responsibility in all areas of city business. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion Proposed Ordinance Excerpt of Planning Commission Minutes Site Plan Landscape Plan Solar Study Solar Carport Schematics Solar Renderings Prepared by: Julie Grove, Economic Development Specialist Reviewed by: Sean Walther, Planning and Zoning Supervisor Michele Schnitker, Deputy Community Development Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8h) Page 2 Title: Arlington Row East Planned Unit Development (PUD) Major Amendment DISCUSSION BACKGROUND: In November 2015 the City Council approved a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Plat and PUD ordinance amendment for the Arlington Row Apartments West (Phase I) site to allow two, three-story apartment buildings with 17 units in each building (34 units total). The Arlington Row Apartments East (Phase II) PUD and Plat was approved in March 2016 to allow one three-story apartment building with 27 units. In December 2015, the Metropolitan Council awarded the Arlington Row development (both Arlington Row West & East) a $581,000 Livable Communities Demonstration Account (LCDA) grant to be used for stormwater, geothermal and solar/energy efficiency. The developer is now requesting a major amendment to the PUD for both Arlington Row West and Arlington Row East to incorporate solar panels. During the PUD and Plat process it was anticipated that solar panels would be incorporated into the development utilizing the LCDA grant. Initially it was thought the panels would be placed on the building. The developer is proposing instead to install solar panels on top of carport structures that would be located within the parking lots of both sites. The proposed site modifications result in greater than a 10 percent change of the total site area, and other previously approved standards, thus the Zoning Code considers the requested change to be a Major Amendment. Site Information: Comprehensive Plan: Arlington Row East – Medium Density Residential Zoning: Arlington Row East - PUD 5 Neighborhood: Pennsylvania Park City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8h) Page 3 Title: Arlington Row East Planned Unit Development (PUD) Major Amendment PUD SOLAR ANALYSIS: Melrose Company is requesting approval of a 40kw solar powered electrical installation that will be constructed above carport structures located on the eastern portion of the parking lot (see the attached site plan). These structures will be constructed of galvanized steel beams secured by concrete piers and, in addition to housing the solar panels (which will sit atop of the steel beams), it will shelter 19 parking stalls. A solar study was conducted and the location of the carport was selected to minimize shading and maximize solar capacity. The solar plan is attached. The solar installation was designed to generate at least 40kw of power. While actual energy generation is dependent on weather, shading, etc., it is anticipated that this system will generate an average of 54-55 kilowatt hours of power. This equates to approximately 40-45% of the electrical needs on site. The solar power will be hooked up to the main meter in the building. As the power is generated it will be used on site, decreasing the amount of power generated by Xcel. Per the Zoning Code, these carport structures are considered an accessory structure. Below is an analysis of the code requirements affected by this proposal. Factor Required Proposed Met? Setbacks None with a PUD North carport: 8 ft from north property line, 5 feet from east South carport min.: 5 ft from east, 46 ft from south Yes Height None with PUD 14 feet Yes Parking Off Street Parking - 43 43 stalls (unchanged from previous approval) Yes Landscaping See landscaping section Yes Setbacks: The approved PUD Ordinance for Arlington Row does not specify setbacks for accessory structures but in residential zoning districts accessory structures are typically permitted to be located up to 2 feet from property lines in the backyard. The subject site is a through lot with streets on both the north and south sides of the lot. For purposes of this PUD, staff has determined the north side, adjacent to Wayzata Blvd, to be the backyard. The plan provides setbacks of 8 feet from the north property line (this is just over the curb of the parking lot), 5 feet from the east property line and 46 feet from the south property line. These setbacks were measured from the outer edge of the solar panels that overhang the posts. Height: The zoning code allows accessory structures in residential districts to be up to 15 feet in height. To maximize the amount of solar energy generated, the canopy holding the panels will be tilted at a 10 degree slope facing south as indicated on the plans. Thus the high point of the solar panels is proposed to be approximately 14 feet. The low point will be approximately 8-9 feet, providing ample room for vehicles underneath. Parking: The Arlington Row East approved parking plan provided 43 spaces. The amount of parking spaces remains the same (43 spaces). However, some of the parking spaces have been shifted and adjusted to fit in the columns for the carport structure. Two spaces were changed to compact spaces. The Zoning Code allows up to 20 percent of the required spaces to be compact. Thus the parking changes conform to code requirements. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8h) Page 4 Title: Arlington Row East Planned Unit Development (PUD) Major Amendment Landscaping: The developer proposes some modifications to the landscape plan. To accommodate the solar carport structure, the developer has proposed eliminating one parking island which was located under the structure. The tree and shrubs from this island have been moved to other locations on site. In addition, the developer is proposing to move some of the trees located along the south and east side of the parking lot to minimize the amount of shading on the solar panels. The shading from these trees can be seen on the attached Solar Study. These trees have been added along the eastern property line next to the outdoor open space. Trees have also been added along 13th Lane and Wayzata Boulevard. The amount of landscaping proposed is the same as was previously approved which included 27 trees and 169 shrubs with a total of 69 caliper inches. Staff finds the proposed changes are in keeping with the intent of the ordinance. Staff finds the above changes to be reasonable and do not affect the placement of the previously approved building and parking lot. The proposed solar carport structures will add the amenity of covered parking for residents and the solar installations satisfy the following objectives of the PUD zoning district:  Promote higher standards of site and building design.  More creative and efficient use of land.  Promote environmental sustainability in the development of land and building operations.  The use of on-site renewable energy is encouraged. PUBLIC INPUT: A neighborhood meeting was held July 26, 2016. Two residents attended the meeting to get more information on the revisions to the plat and the proposed solar installations. The plans were well received. NEXT STEPS: If approved, the second reading is scheduled for the September 6, 2016 meeting on the consent agenda. The developer hopes to start construction by this fall, 2016. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8h) Page 5 Title: Arlington Row East Planned Unit Development (PUD) Major Amendment ORDINANCE NO. ____-16 ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 36-268-PUD 5 RELATING TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7705 WAYZATA BOULEVARD THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK DOES ORDAIN: Findings Sec. 1. The City Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission (Case No. 16-02-S and 16-03-PUD). Sec. 2. The Comprehensive Plan designates this property as RM-Medium Density Residential. Sec. 3. The City Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission (Case No. 16-32-PUD) for amending Ordinance 2489-16 to allow solar panel installations above carports in the parking lot. Sec. 4. The St. Louis Park Ordinance Code, Section 36-268-PUD 5 is hereby amended by adding underscored language. Section breaks are represented by ***. *** (a) Development Plan *** 23. Solar Canopy Details 24. Solar Study *** (c) Accessory Uses *** (6) Solar panels as regulated by this Chapter. a. Rooftop or building mounted systems 1. Roof or building mounted solar systems shall not exceed the maximum allowed height in the PUD zoning district. b. Ground or accessory structure mounted solar systems City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8h) Page 6 Title: Arlington Row East Planned Unit Development (PUD) Major Amendment 1. The height of a ground or accessory structure mounted solar system, measured when oriented at maximum design tilt, shall not exceed 15 feet. 2. Ground or accessory structure mounted solar systems shall have a minimum setback of 8 feet from the north property line, 5 feet from the east property line, 46 feet from the south property line and shall be subject to the principal building setbacks along west property line. Sec. 5. The contents of Planning Case File 16-32-PUD are hereby entered into and made part of the public hearing record and the record of decision for this case. Sec. 6. This Ordinance shall take effect fifteen days after its publication. Public Hearing August 3, 2016 First Reading August 15, 2016 Second Reading September 6, 2016 Date of Publication September 15, 2016 Date Ordinance takes effect September 30, 2016 Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council September 6, 2016 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Approved as to Form and Execution: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Soren Mattick, City Attorney City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8h) Page 7 Title: Arlington Row East Planned Unit Development (PUD) Major Amendment Excerpts – Unofficial Minutes PLANNING COMMISSION ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA AUGUST 3, 2016 – 6:00 p.m. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 3. Public Hearings C. Major Amendment to Planned Unit Development Location: 7705 Wayzata Blvd. – Arlington Row Apartments East Applicant: Melrose Company Case No.: 16-32-PUD Julie Grove, Economic Development Specialist, presented the staff report. She explained that the request is for solar panel installations above carports, designed in the same way as carports for Arlington Row Apartments West. Carports of Phase II, East site, are split in two locations on the east side of the parking lot. She reviewed the setbacks and height of the carport structure. She said due to installation of carports two of the stalls will be compact stalls. She reviewed landscaping changes. Commissioner Carper asked about lack of screening to obscure the concrete pillars of the parking structure from residents across the street. He asked about the exposed row of parking on the north side. He asked why carports wouldn’t appear on that side. Ms. Grove responded that the east side of the property will be screened with evergreens. On the south solar panels will be visible especially in the winter. Additional trees will provide screening in the summer. The north side wasn’t proposed for solar because of shading from the building itself. Robert Cunningham, Melrose Company, said deliberate placement of solar panels was considered to try to get as much solar power as possible during winter months. Some of the structure will be visible to residents to the south. There is a good distance between the Arlington property line and the residential front yards. There will be substantial shrubbery and trees lining the 13th Lane elevation. Commissioner Robertson asked about the location of accessible parking spaces. Mr. Cunningham said the accessible spaces were not moved to the solar carport areas. They remain closest to the main entrance of the building and accessible building units. He said he could look at moving those spaces to the carport area. Commissioner Robertson also asked if the applicant would consider expanding the north solar array further west so that more solar power could be generated. Mr. Cunningham stated the building may provide too much shading but that he would have his architect analyze it and work with staff if it is feasible. Commissioner Person opened the public hearing. As no one was present wishing to speak, he closed the public hearing. Commissioner Robertson made a motion to recommending approval of the Major Amendment to the Arlington Row East PUD. Commissioner Carper seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 4-0. (25) INTERIOR BIKE STORAGE (4) BIKE STALLS (6) BIKE STALLS (6) BIKE STALLS (4) BIKE STALLS (6) BIKE STALLS TRASH & RECYCLE ENCLOSURE W/CONCRETE PAVEMENT WITH MASONRY WALLS TO MATCH BUILDING. SEE ARCHITECTURAL MODULAR RETAINING WALL WITH 36" FENCE FOR SCREENING 2 STAIRS SEE ARCHITECTURAL CONCRETE SIDEWALK TYP. 2 STAIRS SEE ARCHITECTURAL (8) CONCRETE PATIOS WITH SCREEN WALL. SEE ARCHITECTURAL BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT 18.0 24.0 8.5 8.0 8.0 8.0 22.0 18.0 24.0 16.0 8.5 8.5 8.5 6.0 6.0 8.0 (3) COMPACT STALLS 8'x16' REMOVE (7) EXISTING CONCRETE APRONS. REPLACE WITH CONCRETE CURB TO MATCH CURB IN 13TH LANE CONCRETE SIDEWALK TYP. OUTDOOR RECREATIONAL AREA RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY GARDEN SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN1 STAIR 2 STAIRS 2 STAIRS (1) COMPACT STALL 8.5'x16' COMPACT STALL SIGN COMPACT STALL SIGN ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL SIGN 3.7 1 STAIRS ADA COMPLIANT SIDEWALK AT 5% OR LESS WITH MODULAR WALL ON WEST SIDE AND BACK OF CURB EXPOSED ON EAST SIDE. PEDESTRIAN RAMP PEDESTRIAN RAMP PEDESTRIAN RAMP PEDESTRIAN RAMP PEDESTRIAN RAMP 59.557.2 3.3 1.3 3.3 13.3 BUILDING SETBACK 6' TALL CEDAR FENCE ON TOP OF RETAINING WALL 6' TALL CEDAR FENCE NO PARKING STRIPING FOR LOADING ZONE NO PARKING LOADING ZONE SIGN NO PARKING LOADING ZONE SIGN 18.5 10.0 STOP SIGN CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY EXACT LOCATION OF VAULT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION RETAINING WALL 5.7 3.3 5.7 3.3 10.0 10.0 5.0 4.0 5.5 8.6 9.5 11.9 3.0 R312.8 R3.0R3.0 R4.0 R4.0 R2.5 R2.0 R8.0 R8.0 (2) COMPACT STALLS 8'x18' COMPACT STALL SIGN SOLAR CANOPY COLUMN. COORDINATE FOOTING LOCATION WITH CURB & GUTTER. 18.0 (3) COMPACT STALLS 8'x18' 5.0 10.0 07/15/16 - 100% CD'S LOUCKS W:\2015\15186.0A\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\EAST SITE\C2-1 SITE PLANPlotted: 07 /15 / 2016 9:22 AM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. CADD QUALIFICATION SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL Arlington Row Apartments East St. Louis Park, MN Melrose Company 22375 Murray Street Excelsior, MN 55331 12/03/15 CITY SUBMITTAL 03/18/16 Watershed Resubmittal 04/27/16 85%CD / HUD Submittal 05/27/16 HUD Review Response Items 05/27/16 100% CD's 07/06/16 City PUD Amendment 07/15/16 100 % CD'S - JPS REVIEW C1.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C2.1 SITE PLAN C3.1 GRADING PLAN C3.2 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C3.3 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C3.4 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C4.1 SANITARY & WATERMAIN C4.2 STORM SEWER C8.1 DETAILS C8.2 CITY DETAILS L1.1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2.1 TREE INVENTORY PLAN HUD Project # 092-35807 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. PJ Disch - PE 49933 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. 07/15/2016 15186A PJD PJD PJD N  WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. SITE PLAN GENERAL NOTES 1.MINIMUM SETBACKS: FRONT BUILDING SETBACK = 25 FT SIDE BUILDING SETBACK = 10 FT. REAR BUILDING SETBACK = 0 FT. 2.ZONING EXISTING ZONING =R-3 PROPOSED ZONING = PUD 3. PARKING SUMMARY BIKE COUNT SUMMARY SURFACE REGULAR STALLS = 41 1 PER DWELLING = 27 SURFACE HANDICAPPED STALLS = 2 1 PER 10 PARKING STALLS = 5 TOTAL SURFACE STALLS = 43 TOTAL REQUIRED = 32 BIKE STALLS INSIDE = 25 BIKE STALLS OUTSIDE = 26 TOTAL PROPOSED = 51 4. AREA/DENSITY TOTAL AREA = 39,977 SQ.FT. OR 0.918 AC. IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA = 30,795 SQ.FT. OR 0.707 AC. = 77.0% PERVIOUS SURFACE AREA = 9,182 SQ.FT. OR 0.211 AC. =23.0% 5. ALL PAVING, CONCRETE CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DETAILS SHOWN PER SHEET C8-1 AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. SEE LANDSCAPE AND ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR ANY ADDITIONAL HARDSCAPE APPLICATIONS. 6. THE CITY AND THE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY WORK WITHIN THE STREET RIGHT OF WAY (SIDEWALK, STREET OR DRIVEWAYS) 7. MINNESOTA STATE STATUTE REQUIRES NOTIFICATION PER "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY GRADING, EXCAVATION OR UNDERGROUND WORK. 8. SEE CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS FOR ANY REMOVAL DETAILS. 9. ANY SIGN OR FIXTURES REMOVED WITH IN THE RIGHT OF WAY OR AS PART OF THE SITE WORK SHALL BE REPLACED BY THE CONTRACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY REQUIREMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PRESERVE AND MAINTAIN ANY EXISTING STREET LIGHTS AND TRAFFIC SIGNS PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. 10. CLEAR AND GRUB AND REMOVE ALL TREES, VEGETATION AND SITE DEBRIS PRIOR TO GRADING. ALL REMOVED MATERIAL SHALL BE HAULED FROM THE SITE DAILY. ALL CLEARING AND GRUBBING AND REMOVALS SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY ESTABLISHED UPON REMOVAL. (SEE SHEET C3-1) 11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO OBTAIN ALL PERMITS FROM THE CITY AS REQUIRED FOR ALL WORK WITH THE STREET AND PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. 12. A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF SITE IMPROVEMENTS NOT SHOWN ON THIS SHEET ARE DESCRIBED AND PROVIDED IN FURTHER DETAIL ON THE ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPE PLANS. THIS INCLUDES LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND OTHER FIXTURES. 13. B612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE EDGE OF ALL COMMON DRIVES AND PARKING LOTS. 14. CONSTRUCTION NOTES: A. PEDESTRIAN RAMPS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE LOCATIONS SHOWN AND AS SHOWN PER THE LANDSCAPE SITE PLANS. B. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SAW-CUT BITUMINOUS AND CONCRETE PAVEMENTS AS REQUIRED PER THE SPECIFICATIONS. REMOVE EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER AND INSTALL B618 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER. 15. SEE SHEETS C3-1 AND C4-1 FOR GRADING AND UTILITIES. 16. ALL CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER B612, CITY'S STANDARD PLATES. (SEE DETAIL SHEET). 17. THE INTENT OF THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION IS TO PRESERVE AS MUCH OF THE EXISTING STREET PAVEMENT AS POSSIBLE, AND TO MILL AND OVERLAY. REMOVED PAVEMENT AREAS AND PATCHING SHALL BE INSTALLED PER PAVEMENT SECTION PROVIDED PER DETAIL SHEET. PAVEMENT LEGEND: CONCRETE PAVEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK SITE PLAN C2.1 SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 SITE B City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8h) Title: Arlington Row East Planned Unit Development (PUD) Major Amendment Page 8   1 BO 4 HC 3 SH 19 FD 4 SJ 6 MS 3 DH 3 BH 3 BH 3 DH 3 DH 7 CE 2 BH2 BH 8 MS 6 DH 8 CE 8 LS 10 LS 6 SJ 7 EH 6 EH 5 BJ 4 FG 6 PS 9 SD 4 FG 3 EH 3 BJ 7 SG 3 BJ 6 EH 6 SG 6 FG 7 EH 4 BJ 8 FG 8 SG 4 BJ 7 SG 2 GS 1 PE 2 HC 3 BS 4 AG 4 BL 3 GS 25 SJ 7 AP 1 BO DECIDUOUS TREES QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME CONT SIZE AG 4 AUTUMN GOLD GINKGO Ginkgo biloba `Autumn Gold`B & B 2.5"Cal BO 2 BICOLOR OAK Quercus bicolor B & B 2.5"Cal BL 4 BOULEVARD LINDEN Tilia americana `Boulevard`B & B 2.5"Cal PE 1 PRINCETON ELM Ulmus americana `Princeton`B & B 2.5"Cal SH 3 SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST Gleditsia triacanthos `Skycole`B & B 2.5"Cal EVERGREEN TREES QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME CONT SIZE AP 7 AUSTRIAN PINE Pinus nigra B & B 6` HGT BS 3 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE Picea glauca `Densata`B & B 6` HGT ORNAMENTAL TREES QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME CONT SIZE HC 6 HARVEST GOLD CRABAPPLE Malus x `Harvest Gold`B & B 1.5"Cal SHRUBS QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME MIN CONT MIN SIZE SPACING DH 15 DWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLE Diervilla lonicera 5 gal 18" HGT 42" o.c. EH 29 ENDLESS SUMMER HYDRANGEA Hydrangea macrophylla `Endless Summer` TM 5 gal 24" HGT 48" o.c. FD 19 FIREDANCE DOGWOOD Cornus sericea `Bailadeline`5 gal 24" HGT 60" o.c. GS 5 GRO-LOW FRAGRANT SUMAC Rhus aromatica `Gro-Low`5 gal 24" SPRD 72" o.c. LS 18 LITTLE PRINCESS SPIREA Spirea japonica `Little Princess`5 gal 24" HGT 36" o.c. MS 14 MARLEEN SNOWBERRY Symphoricarpos x doorenbosii `Marleen` 5 gal 24" HGT 42" o.c. CONIFEROUS SHRUBS QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME MIN CONT MIN SIZE SPACING BJ 19 BLUE RUG JUNIPER Juniperus horizontalis `Wiltonii`5 gal 24" SPRD 60" o.c. CE 15 CANADALE GOLD EUONYMUS Euonymus fortunei `Canadale Gold`5 gal 24" SPRD 42" o.c. SJ 35 SEA GREEN JUNIPER Juniperus chinensis `Sea Green`5 gal 24" HGT 60" o.c. PERENNIALS QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME MIN CONT MIN SIZE SPACING BH 10 BLUE ANGEL HOSTA Hosta `Blue Angel`1 gal 36" o.c. FG 22 FEATHER REED GRASS Calamagrostis x acutiflora `Karl Foerster`1 gal 30" o.c. PS 6 PURPLE EMPEROR SEDUM Sedum `Purple Emperor`1 gal 24" o.c. SG 28 SHENANDOAH SWITCH GRASS Panicum virgatum `Shenendoah`1 gal 30" o.c. SD 9 STELLA D` ORO DAYLILY Hemerocallis x `Stella de Oro`1 gal 24" o.c. PLANT SCHEDULE 07/15/16 - 100% CD's LOUCKS W:\2015\15186.0A\CADD DATA\LANDSCAPE\_dwg Sheet Files\East\L1-1Plotted: 07 /15 / 2016 9:32 AM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. CADD QUALIFICATION SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL Arlington Row Apartments East St. Louis Park, MN Melrose Company 22375 Murray Street Excelsior, MN 55331 12/03/15 CITY SUBMITTAL 03/18/16 Watershed Resubmittal 04/27/16 85%CD / HUD Submittal 05/27/16 HUD Review Response Items 05/27/16 100% CD's 07/06/16 City PUD Amendment 07/15/16 100% CD'S - JPS REVIEW C1.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C2.1 SITE PLAN C3.1 GRADING PLAN C3.2 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C3.3 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C3.4 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C4.1 SANITARY & WATERMAIN C4.2 STORM SEWER C8.1 DETAILS C8.2 CITY DETAILS L1.1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2.1 TREE INVENTORY PLAN HUD Project # 092-35807 LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION: COORDINATE THE PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION AND PLANTING INSTALLATION WITH OTHER CONTRACTORS WORKING ON SITE. NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL COMPLETE GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. WHERE SOD/SEED ABUTS PAVED SURFACES, FINISHED GRADE OF SOD/SEED SHALL BE HELD 1" BELOW SURFACE ELEVATION OF TRAIL, SLAB, CURB, ETC. SEED ALL AREAS DISTURBED DUE TO GRADING OTHER THAN THOSE AREAS NOTED TO RECEIVE SOD. SEED SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MULCHED AS PER MNDOT SPECS. SOD ALL DESIGNATED AREAS DISTURBED DUE TO GRADING. SOD SHALL BE LAID PARALLEL TO THE CONTOURS AND SHALL HAVE STAGGERED JOINTS. ON SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 OR IN DRAINAGE SWALES, THE SOD SHALL BE STAKED TO THE GROUND. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, ALL SHRUBS SHALL HAVE AT LEAST 5 CANES AT THE SPECIFIED MINIMUM SHRUB HEIGHT OR WIDTH. ORNAMENTAL TREES SHALL HAVE NO V CROTCHES AND SHALL BEGIN BRANCHING NO LOWER THAN 3' ABOVE ROOT BALL. STREET AND BOULEVARD TREES SHALL BEGIN BRANCHING NO LOWER THAN 5' ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. ANY CONIFEROUS TREE PREVIOUSLY PRUNED FOR CHRISTMAS TREE SALES SHALL NOT BE USED. ALL CONIFEROUS TREES SHALL BE FULL FORM, NATURAL TO THE SPECIES, WITHOUT PRUNING. PLAN TAKES PRECEDENCE OVER PLANT SCHEDULE IF DISCREPANCIES IN QUANTITIES EXIST. SPECIFICATIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER NOTES. NO PLANT MATERIAL SUBSTITUTIONS WILL BE ACCEPTED UNLESS APPROVAL IS REQUESTED OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF A BID AND/OR QUOTATION. ALL PROPOSED PLANTS SHALL BE LOCATED AND STAKED AS SHOWN ON PLAN. ADJUSTMENTS IN LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLANT MATERIALS MAY BE NEEDED IN FIELD. SHOULD AN ADJUSTMENT BE ADVISED, THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST BE NOTIFIED. ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE FERTILIZED UPON INSTALLATION WITH A 27-3-3 SLOW RELEASE FERTILIZER MIXED IN WITH THE PLANTING SOIL PER THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. PLANTS MAY BE TREATED FOR SUMMER AND FALL INSTALLATION WITH AN APPLICATION OF GRANULAR 27-3-3 AT 6 OZ PER 2.5" CALIPER PER TREE AND 3 OZ PER SHRUB WITH AN ADDITIONAL APPLICATION OF 27-3-3 THE FOLLOWING SPRING IN THE TREE SAUCER. ALL PLANTING AREAS RECEIVING GROUND COVER, PERENNIALS, ANNUALS, AND/OR VINES SHALL RECEIVE A MINIMUM OF 12" DEPTH OF PLANTING SOIL CONSISTING OF AT LEAST 45 PARTS TOPSOIL, 45 PARTS PEAT OR MANURE AND 10 PARTS SAND. ALL PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER PLANTING DETAILS. REMOVE ALL FLAGGING AND LABELS FROM PLANTS. WRAPPING MATERIAL SHALL BE CORRUGATED PVC PIPING 1" GREATER IN CALIPER THAN THE TREE BEING PROTECTED OR QUALITY, HEAVY, WATERPROOF CREPE PAPER MANUFACTURED FOR THIS PURPOSE. WRAP ALL DECIDUOUS TREES PLANTED IN THE FALL PRIOR TO 12-1 AND REMOVE ALL WRAPPING AFTER 5-1. BLACK METAL EDGER TO BE USED TO CONTAIN SHRUBS, PERENNIALS, AND ANNUALS WHERE BED MEETS SOD/SEED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. ALL ANNUAL AND PERENNIAL PLANTING BEDS TO RECEIVE 3" DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH WITH NO WEED BARRIER. ALL SHRUB BED MASSINGS TO RECEIVE 3" DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH AND FIBER MAT WEED BARRIER. ALL TREES TO RECEIVE 4" DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH WITH NO MULCH IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH TREE TRUNK. SPREAD GRANULAR PRE EMERGENT HERBICIDE (PREEN OR EQUAL) PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS UNDER ALL MULCHED AREAS. MAINTENANCE STRIPS TO HAVE EDGER AND MULCH AS SPECIFIED/INDICATED ON DRAWING OR IN SPECIFICATION. IF THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS CONCERNED OR PERCEIVES ANY DEFICIENCIES IN THE PLANT SELECTIONS, SOIL CONDITIONS OR ANY OTHER SITE CONDITION WHICH MIGHT NEGATIVELY AFFECT PLANT ESTABLISHMENT, SURVIVAL OR GUARANTEE, HE MUST BRING THESE DEFICIENCIES TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO PROCUREMENT AND/OR INSTALLATION. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A WRITTEN REQUEST FOR THE OWNER ACCEPTANCE INSPECTION OF ALL LANDSCAPE AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ON-GOING MAINTENANCE OF ALL NEWLY INSTALLED MATERIALS UNTIL TIME OF OWNER ACCEPTANCE. ANY ACTS OF VANDALISM OR DAMAGE WHICH MAY OCCUR PRIOR TO OWNER ACCEPTANCE SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH A MAINTENANCE PROGRAM INCLUDING, BUT NOT NECESSARILY LIMITED TO, PRUNING, FERTILIZATION AND DISEASE/PEST CONTROL. CONTRACTOR SHALL GUARANTEE NEW PLANT MATERIAL THROUGH ONE CALENDAR YEAR FROM THE DATE OF OWNER ACCEPTANCE. WARRANTY (ONE FULL GROWING SEASON) FOR LANDSCAPE MATERIALS SHALL BEGIN ON THE DATE OF ACCEPTANCE BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AFTER THE COMPLETION OF PLANTING OF ALL LANDSCAPE MATERIALS. NO PARTIAL ACCEPTANCE WILL BE CONSIDERED. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE THE APPROPRIATE DATES FOR SPRING PLANT MATERIAL INSTALLATION AND SEED/SOD PLACEMENT IS FROM THE TIME GROUND HAS THAWED TO JUNE 15. FALL SODDING IS GENERALLY ACCEPTABLE FROM AUGUST 15 - NOVEMBER 1. FALL SEEDING FROM AUGUST 15 - SEPTEMBER 15; DORMANT SEEDING IN THE FALL SHALL NOT OCCUR PRIOR TO NOVEMBER 1. FALL CONIFEROUS PLANTING MAY OCCUR FROM AUGUST 15 - OCTOBER 1 AND DECIDUOUS PLANTING FROM THE FIRST FROST UNTIL NOVEMBER 15. PLANTING OUTSIDE THESE DATES IS NOT RECOMMENDED. ANY ADJUSTMENT MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. PROTECT ALL EXISTING OAKS ON SITE SCHEDULED TO REMAIN. IF EXISTING OAKS ARE DAMAGED IN ANY MANNER, ABOVE OR BELOW GROUND IN THE ROOT SYSTEM, AN ASPHALTIC TREE PRUNING PAINT SHOULD BE APPLIED IMMEDIATELY AFTER WOUNDING. OAKS ARE NOT TO BE PRUNED, REMOVED OR TRANSPLANTED BETWEEN APRIL 15 AND JULY 1. NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IF THESE DATES ARE UNAVOIDABLE. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL ESTABLISH TO HIS SATISFACTION THAT SOIL AND COMPACTION CONDITIONS ARE ADEQUATE TO ALLOW FOR PROPER DRAINAGE AT AND AROUND THE BUILDING SITE. IRRIGATION NOTES: VERIFY EXISTING/PROPOSED IRRIGATION SYSTEM LAYOUT AND CONFIRM COMPLETE LIMITS OF IRRIGATION PRIOR TO SUPPLYING SHOP DRAWINGS. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AN IRRIGATION LAYOUT PLAN AND SPECIFICATION AS A PART OF THE SCOPE OF WORK WHEN BIDDING. THESE SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO ORDER AND/OR INSTALLATION. IT SHALL BE THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO INSURE THAT ALL SODDED/SEEDED AND PLANTED AREAS ARE IRRIGATED PROPERLY, INCLUDING THOSE AREAS DIRECTLY AROUND AND ABUTTING BUILDING FOUNDATION. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH AN IRRIGATION SCHEDULE APPROPRIATE TO THE PROJECT SITE CONDITIONS AND TO PLANT MATERIAL GROWTH REQUIREMENTS. IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS NOT TO SPRINKLE ACROSS PAVEMENT. THE SYSTEM SHALL INCORPORATE A RAIN SENSOR INTO IRRIGATION SYSTEM. PLANTINGS OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF IRRIGATION ARE TO BE WATERED REGULARLY UNTIL PLANTING/SOD/SEED HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. N Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Timothy J. Fedie - LA 48303 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. 07/15/16 15186A MJS TJF TJF LANDSCAPE PLAN: DORA CALCULATIONS: SITE AREA = 39,967 SQ.FT. DORA REQUIRED (12% OF SITE AREA) = 4,796 SQ.FT. DORA PROPOSED = 5,651 SQ.FT. OR 14% (MARKED ON PLAN WITH HATCH) PLANTING DETAILS: LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS: 1 TREE PER UNIT (ORNAMENTALS AT 2:1 RATIO) 6 SHRUBS PER 1,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA PROPOSED UNITS = 27 GROSS FLOOR AREA = 28,088 SF TREES REQUIRED = 27 TREES PROPOSED = 14 OVERSTORY, 10 CONIFEROUS, 6 ORNAMENTAL SHRUBS REQUIRED = 169 SHRUBS PROPOSED = 169 TREE MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS = 48 CALIPER INCHES TOTAL PROPOSED = 69 CALIPER INCHES LANDSCAPE PLAN L1.1SITE B City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8h) Title: Arlington Row East Planned Unit Development (PUD) Major Amendment Page 9 City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8h) Title: Arlington Row East Planned Unit Development (PUD) Major AmendmentPage 10 HSS STEEL TUBE GALV & PAINTED, BY SOLAR CONTRACTOR 16" CAST IN PLACE PIER WITH RUBBED FINISH AND SLOPED TOP 24" CAST IN PLACE PIER HOLD 6' BELOW FINISH GRADE CAST IN PLACE FOOTING STEEL COLUMN BOLTED TO PIER AND ENCASED IN CONCRETE 18' - 0" PARKING STALL DEPTH SEE MANUF DRAWINGSMIN 8' - 6" CLEARFROM PARKING STALL OPEN END MIN 2' - 0" SEE MANUF DRAWINGS NOTE: •ALL DIMENSION AND MEMBER SIZE SHOWN FOR DESIGN INTENT •SOLAR CANOPY INSTALLER TO PROVIDE ENGINEERED DRAWINGS •ALL EXTERIOR STEEL TO BE GALVANIZED AND PAINTED 6"FINISH GRADE - SEE CIVIL FINISH GRADE3' - 0" ABOVE TOP OF PIER SLOPE DIRECTION SHOWN TYPICAL - INSTALLER TO VERIFY AND COORDINATE FACING TO OPTIMIZE PRODUCTION EFFICIENCY 10°BOLTED CONNECTION CAR "BASH BAR" ICE / SNOW GUARD 8' - 6"1' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"1' - 6"8' - 6"0"8' - 6"8' - 6"1' - 6"8' - 6"0"8' - 6"8' - 6"1' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"1' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"1' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"9" 1 AS1.5 27' - 0"27' - 0"27' - 0"27' - 0"27' - 0"27' - 0"12' - 0"12' - 0"162' - 0" 27' - 0"27' - 0"27' - 0" 9"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"1' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"1' - 6"8' - 0"8' - 0"8' - 6" 27' - 0"27' - 0"27' - 0" 81' - 0"12' - 0"12' - 0"27' - 0"27' - 0"27' - 0"0"9"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"1' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"1' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"9" 27' - 0"27' - 0"27' - 0" 81' - 0"12' - 0"12' - 0"elness swenson graham architects 500 washington avenue south m inneapolis m innesota 55415 p. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 5 0 8 f. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 3 8 2 w w w . e s g a r c h . c o m I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or r e p o r t was prepared by m e or under m y direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of M innesota Signature Typed or Printed Nam e License # D ate PROJECT NUM BER D RAW N BY CHECKED BY O RIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIO NS KEY PL A N N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T IO N **D R A F T ** H UD PRO JECT NUM BER 6/29/2016 2:14:45 PMAS1.5 SOLAR CANOPY 215515 M E Checker 7/6/2016 ARLINGTON ROW ARLINGTON ROW ST. LO UIS PARK, M N 5/27/2016 - 100% CD's 092-35807 No. Des c ription Date 2 7/6/2016 - City PUD Am endm ent 7/6/2016 1/4" = 1'-0"AS1.5 1 Solar Canopy 1/8" = 1'-0"AS1.5 A1 Solar Canopy A - 1 1/8" = 1'-0"AS1.5 B2 Solar Canopy B - 2 1/8" = 1'-0"AS1.5 B1 Solar Canopy B - 1 2 Solar Arrays B1 3 Bays @ 27' OC (60 Panels) 5 x 13 B2 3 Bays @ 27' OC (60 Panels) 5 x 13 A1 6 Bays @ 27' OC (135 Panels) 5 x 27 12" = 1'-0"AS1.5 2 Solar Canopy City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8h) Title: Arlington Row East Planned Unit Development (PUD) Major Amendment Page 11 Melrose Company LLC ARLINGTON ROW St Louis Park MN Neighborhood Meeting - Solar 2016 July 22 SITE PLAN City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8h) Title: Arlington Row East Planned Unit Development (PUD) Major Amendment Page 12 Melrose Company LLC ARLINGTON ROW St Louis Park MN Neighborhood Meeting - Solar 2016 July 22 View from 394 LOOKING SOUTHWEST City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8h) Title: Arlington Row East Planned Unit Development (PUD) Major Amendment Page 13 Melrose Company LLC ARLINGTON ROW St Louis Park MN Neighborhood Meeting - Solar 2016 July 22 Outdoor Recreation Yard LOOKING SOUTHEAST City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8h) Title: Arlington Row East Planned Unit Development (PUD) Major Amendment Page 14 Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: August 15, 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: First Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Pertaining to Accessory Buildings and Signs RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to approve the First Reading of an Ordinance amending the Zoning Code pertaining to accessory buildings and signage, and to set the Second Reading for September 6, 2016. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the council wish to amend the ordinance pertaining to accessory buildings and signage? SUMMARY: Staff is requesting an amendment to the Zoning Code that proposes to: 1. Update the maximum size accessory building that can be constructed without a building permit, and require a zoning permit for those buildings. 2. Correct conflicting setbacks required for accessory buildings. 3. Increase the size maximum allowed for signs in the R-4 Multiple-Family Residence district, and the R-C High-Density Multiple-Family Residence district. 4. Decrease the minimum setback required for signs at schools, community centers, libraries, religious institutions, and other similar uses. Planning Commission Review: On July 20, 2016, the Planning Commission held a public hearing for the requested zoning amendment. No one was present to speak, and the Planning Commission recommended approval of the ordinance with a 5-0 vote. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion Proposed Ordinance Excerpt of Planning Commission Minutes Prepared by: Gary Morrison, Assistant Zoning Administrator Reviewed by: Sean Walther, Planning & Zoning Supervisor Michele Schnitker, Housing Supervisor Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Action Agenda Item: 8i City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8i) Page 2 Title: First Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Pertaining to Accessory Buildings and Signs DISCUSSION REQUEST: Staff is requesting an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance that proposes to: 1. Update the maximum size accessory building that can be constructed without a building permit, and require a zoning permit for those buildings. 2. Correct conflicting setbacks required for accessory buildings. 3. Increase the size maximum allowed for signs in the R-4 Multiple-Family Residence district, and the R-C High-Density Multiple-Family Residence district. 4. Decrease the minimum setback required for signs at schools, community centers, libraries, religious institutions, and other similar uses. BACKGROUND: Staff is requesting the amendments for various reasons, and each amendment is discussed below. Accessory Buildings: There are two changes proposed that effect accessory buildings. 1. The minimum setback allowed for accessory buildings is two feet, measured from side and rear property lines to the edge of the eave or similar overhang. There is an old provision in the code that contradicts this setback. The encroachment section of the code allows the eave of an accessory building to be located 16 inches from the property line. Staff is recommending this provision be removed. 2. In 2015, the state increased the minimum size of accessory building to be constructed without a building permit from 120 to 200 square feet. As a result of this change, the city needs to increase the maximum size that an accessory building needs a zoning permit from 120 to 200 square feet. The zoning permit is a permit submitted to construct a shed or similar building. It gives the city the opportunity to review buildings that are too small to trigger a building permit in order to ensure that they meet the required setbacks and other zoning regulations. Signs: The proposed changes to the sign ordinance include: 1. Creating two categories for signs in the R-4 Multiple-Family Residence district. The first category establishes criteria for properties less than 30,000 square feet in area, the second category establishes criteria for properties greater than 30,000 square feet in area. 2. Increasing the amount of signage allowed for properties in the R-C High-Density Multiple- Family Residence district from 40 to 60 square feet for properties less than 30,000 square feet, and from 80 to 100 square feet for properties greater than 30,000 square feet. The purpose of the sign area amendments for the R-4 and R-C districts is twofold. First, it is to provide more signage for the larger projects. The larger projects tend to have more street frontages, and therefore, a need for additional signage. Large developments with very little signage make it difficult to identify the development. Second, and somewhat related to the first, is to provide signage that is in scale with the size and scope of the development. 3. Decreasing the minimum required setback for signs located at schools, religious institutions and similar uses from 25 to 10 feet. The setback for signs throughout the city is 10 feet from property line. There are some exceptions, such as signs in the C-1, C-2, BP City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8i) Page 3 Title: First Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Pertaining to Accessory Buildings and Signs (Business Park), and M-X (Mixes Use) districts have a five-foot minimum setback. The request is to allow institutions to utilize the standard 10-foot setback. There are many institutions in the city that have a sign approximately 10 feet from the front property line. These signs are legally non-conforming, and below is a sample of three such signs. These signs would become legally conforming if they are 10 or more feet from the property line. Additionally, the minimum front yard setback for buildings in the single-family zoning districts is 30 feet in the R-1 district, and 25 feet in the R-2 district. A 10-foot setback for signs would better accommodate the sign between the building and the street. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8i) Page 4 Title: First Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Pertaining to Accessory Buildings and Signs The school district currently has a request to install a sign at Central Community Center. The required 25-foot setback places the sign in the drive aisle of the parking lot, while a 10-foot setback allows the sign to be appropriately installed in the area that has been striped for no parking (see aerial photo below). The proposed location of the sign is important as it is visible, and directs people to the appropriate section of the building for specific services. Proposed sign location Property line 25-foot setback City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8i) Page 5 Title: First Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Pertaining to Accessory Buildings and Signs ORDINANCE NO. ____-16 CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 36 OF THE ST. LOUIS PARK CITY CODE RELATING TO SECTION 73-YARD ENCROACHMENTS, SECTION 162-RESTRICTIONS AND PERFORMANCE STANDARDS, AND SECTION 362- SIGN REGULATIONS WHEREAS, The City Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission (Case No. 16-28-ZA). WHEREAS, The St. Louis Park Ordinance Code, Sections 36-4, 36-233, 36-243, and 36-244 are hereby amended by adding underscored language. Section breaks are represented by ***. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK DOES ORDAIN: SECTION 1. St. Louis Park City Code Chapter 36 is amended to add the following section: Sec. 36-73. Yard encroachments. *** (c) Accessory buildings rear or side yard. The following shall not be encroachments on rear and side yard requirements for accessory buildings: cornices, eaves and gutters; provided they do not extend more than eight inches into a required yard; and provided such encroachment is no closer than 16 inches from all lot lines. Building overhangs shall also comply with the state building code. *** Sec. 36-162. Restrictions and performance standards. *** (d) Accessory structures. Accessory structures shall comply with the following regulations: *** (7) Permit required. All accessory buildings (including accessory storage buildings 120 200 square feet or less in area) shall obtain a zoning or building permit prior to installation and must be anchored in a manner approved by the city. *** Sec. 36-362. Sign regulations. *** City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8i) Page 6 Title: First Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Pertaining to Accessory Buildings and Signs TABLE 36-362A SIGN AREA AND HEIGHT Use District &Lot Size (sq ft) Maximum Sign Height (feet) PERMANENT SIGNAGE TEMPORARY SIGNAGE REAL ESTATE SIGNAGE Maximum Total Area (sq ft) Maximum Size of Sign Face (sq ft) Maximum Total Area (sq ft) Maximum Total Area (sq ft) R-4 R-4 0 – 30,000 610 40 40 25 80 Over 30,000 10 60 60 25 80 R-C 0 - 230,000 15 40 60 40 25 80 Over 230,000 15 8100 60 25 80 *** (g) Adjustments to table 36-362A. Signs which qualify for any adjustment permitted under this section shall conform to all other sections of this chapter. (1) In an R district, identification signs may be permitted for religious institutions, libraries, museums, art galleries, schools, golf courses, country clubs, community centers, colleges, universities, hospitals and sanitariums in excess of the size allowed in table 36-362A based on the following criteria: *** e. Location. A freestanding sign shall not be less than 25 feet from any property line. fe. Sign purpose. The principal purpose of any sign permitted under this section shall be to identify the public or institutional use made of the property. SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall take effect fifteen days after its publication. Public Hearing July 20, 2016 First Reading August 15, 2016 Second Reading September 6, 2016 Date of Publication September 15, 2016 Date Ordinance takes effect September 30, 2016 Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council September 6, 2016 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Approved as to Form and Execution: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Soren Mattick, City Attorney City Council Meeting of August 15, 2016 (Item No. 8i) Page 7 Title: First Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Pertaining to Accessory Buildings and Signs EXCERPT OF OFFICIAL MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA JULY 20, 2016 – 6:00 p.m. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 3. Public Hearings D. Zoning Ordinance Amendment pertaining to Fences, Sheds and Signs Applicant: City of St. Louis Park Case No.: 16-28-ZA Gary Morrison, Assistant Zoning Administrator, presented the staff report. He explained the amendment proposes to establish and clarify materials that can be used to construct a fence; update the maximum size accessory building that can be constructed without a building permit; increase the size maximum allowed for signs in the R-4 Multiple-Family Residence district; and decrease the minimum setback required for signs at schools, community centers, libraries, religious institutions, and other similar uses. Commissioner Robertson spoke about the requirement that the finished side of a fence must face neighboring properties. He said the exception to that where it looks unsightly is a wood frame fence with chain link on it. He said he’d like to see a way to address that situation. Commissioner Carper said he was concerned about some fence materials which are excluded such as bamboo and reed. If maintained properly and replaced regularly those materials can be aesthetically pleasing. He discussed a pole type of fence. He said he wasn’t sure about the definition of a rigid plastic fence or if flexible material was not considered acceptable. Mr. Morrison said he had included language such as “other naturally decay resistant wood” for alternative materials. Bamboo would hopefully fall into that category. He said he wasn’t sure about reed. He said maintenance is obviously an issue. The zoning ordinance comes into play when a fence becomes structurally unsound. He said he wasn’t sure what the commissioner meant by a pole fence. He said proposed language was to differentiate rigid plastic fences from snow fences. Commissioner Tatalovich asked why there is a minimum gage requirement on chain link fences. Mr. Morrison said that was for structural integrity and safety. Vice Chair Peilen opened the public hearing. No one was present to speak and she closed the public hearing. Commissioner Carper stated he was uncomfortable with proposed wording regarding exceptions to materials. He said he wasn’t confident that enforcement would be consistent. Commissioners discussed tabling the fence portion of the ordinance for further discussion. Commissioner Robertson made a motion to recommend approval of the Zoning Ordinance amendment pertaining to sheds and signs; and to table the fence portion for further discussion. Commissioner Tatalovich seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 5-0. Commissioner Carper stated he would like to discuss hedge height as part of the fence discussion.