HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016/05/02 - ADMIN - Agenda Packets - City Council - RegularAGENDA
MAY 2, 2016
5:30 p.m. BOARDS & COMMISIONS INTERVIEWS – Community Room
7:15 p.m. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY -- Council Chambers
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Approval of Minutes
3a. Economic Development Authority Meeting Minutes March 21, 2016
3b. Economic Development Authority Meeting Minutes April 4, 2016
4. Approval of Agenda
5. Reports
5a. Approval of EDA Disbursements
6. Old Business – None
7. New Business
7a. Application for Environmental Grant Funds
Recommended Action:
1) Motion to Adopt EDA Resolution authorizing the Executive Director and President
to submit a grant application to the Metropolitan Council Tax Base Revitalization
Grant Program on behalf of the Parkdales project;
2) Motion to Adopt EDA Resolution authorizing the Executive Director and President
to submit a grant application to the Department of Employment and Economic
Development (DEED) Contamination Clean-up Grant Program on behalf of the
Parkway 25 project;
3) Motion to Adopt EDA Resolution authorizing the Executive Director and President
to submit a grant application to the Metropolitan Council Tax Base Revitalization
Grant Program on behalf of the Parkway 25 project;
4) Motion to Adopt EDA Resolution authorizing the Executive Director and President
to submit a grant application to the Hennepin County Environmental Response Fund
Program on behalf of the Parkway 25 project.
5) Motion to Adopt EDA Resolution authorizing the Executive Director and President
to submit a grant application to the Department of Employment and Economic
Development (DEED) Contamination Clean-up Grant Program on behalf of the
Morries Automotive project;
6) Motion to Adopt EDA Resolution authorizing the Executive Director and President
to submit a grant application to the Metropolitan Council Tax Base Revitalization
Grant Program on behalf of the Morries Automotive project;
7) Motion to Adopt EDA Resolution authorizing the Executive Director and President
to submit a grant application to the Hennepin County Environmental Response Fund
Program on behalf of the Morries Automotive project.
7b. Third Amendment to Central Park West Redevelopment Contract
Recommended Action: Adopt EDA Resolution approving the Third Amendment to the
Contract for Private Redevelopment with Central Park West, LLC.
Meeting of May 2, 2016
City Council Agenda
Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. To make arrangements, please call
the Administration Department at 952/924-2525 (TDD 952/924-2518) at least 96 hours in advance of meeting.
8. Communications -- None
9. Adjournment
7:30 p.m. CITY COUNCIL MEETING – Council Chambers
1. Call to Order
1a. Pledge of Allegiance
1b. Roll Call
2. Presentations
2a. St. Louis Park Parktacular Ambassadors Introduction & Recap of Year
2b. Teacher Appreciation Week Proclamation
3. Approval of Minutes
3a. Study Session Meeting Minutes March 28, 2016
3b. Special Study Session Meeting Minutes April 4, 2016
3c. City Council Meeting Minutes April 4, 2016
4. Approval of Agenda and Items on Consent Calendar
NOTE: The Consent Calendar lists those items of business which are considered to be routine and/or which
need no discussion. Consent items are acted upon by one motion. If discussion is desired by either a
Councilmember or a member of the audience, that item may be moved to an appropriate section of the regular
agenda for discussion. The items for the Consent Calendar are listed on the last page of the Agenda.
Recommended Action:
Motion to approve the Agenda as presented and items listed on the Consent Calendar; and to waive
reading of all resolutions and ordinances. (Alternatively: Motion to add or remove items from the agenda,
or move items from Consent Calendar to regular agenda for discussion.)
5. Boards and Commissions -- None
6. Public Hearings – None
7. Requests, Petitions, and Communications from the Public – None
8. Resolutions, Ordinances, Motions and Discussion Items – None
9. Communications – None
8:00 p.m. BOARDS & COMMISSIONS INTERVIEWS Continued – Community Room
Meeting of May 2, 2016
City Council Agenda
CONSENT CALENDAR
4a. Accept for filing City Disbursement Claims for the period of March 26 through April
22, 2016.
4b. Approve a Temporary On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for Finnegans Community
Fund at Gamble Drive and the adjacent privately owned parking lot in West End for
May 21, 2016.
4c. Designate Hardrives, Inc. as the lowest responsible bidder and authorize execution of a
contract with them in the amount of $661,279.87 for the 2016 Municipal State Aid
(MSA) Project No. 4016-1100.
4d. Designate Century Fence Company as the lowest responsible bidder and authorize
execution of a contract with them in the amount of $125,760.40 for the Connect the
Park! Bikeway Project Number 4015-2000.
4e. Approve second reading and Adopt Ordinance approving 2012 International Property
Maintenance Code (IPMC) with Amendments in Chapter 6 Article V – Property
Maintenance Code, Chapter 12 Article II Nuisances and to approve the summary
ordinance for publication.
4f. Adopt Resolution approving relocation of polling place for Precinct 16 located in Ward
4 from Sabes Jewish Community Center to St. Louis Park Middle School, 2025 Texas
Ave. S.
4g. Approve the 2016/2017 Neighborhood Grants.
4h. Adopt Resolution approving the Third Amendment to the Contract for Private
Redevelopment with Central Park West, LLC.
4i. Approve for filing Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of March 16, 2016
St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority and regular City Council meetings are carried live on Civic TV cable channel
17 and replays are frequent; check www.parktv.org for the schedule. The meetings are also streamed live on the internet at
www.parktv.org, and saved for Video on Demand replays. The agenda is posted on Fridays on the official city bulletin board in
the lobby of City Hall and on the text display on Civic TV cable channel 17. The agenda and full packet are available by noon
on Friday on the city’s website.
Meeting: Economic Development Authority
Meeting Date: May 2, 2016
Minutes: 3a
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
MARCH 21, 2016
1. Call to Order
President Mavity called the meeting to order at 7:16 p.m.
Commissioners present: President Anne Mavity, Tim Brausen, Steve Hallfin, Gregg Lindberg,
Susan Sanger, Thom Miller, and Jake Spano.
Commissioners absent: None.
Staff present: Executive Director (Mr. Harmening), City Attorney (Mr. Mattick), Deputy City
Manager/Human Resources Director (Ms. Deno)Economic Development Coordinator (Mr. Hunt),
Senior Planner (Mr. Walther), and Recording Secretary (Ms. Batra).
2. Roll Call
3. Approval of Minutes
3a. Economic Development Authority Meeting Minutes February 16, 2016
It was moved by Commissioner Hallfin, seconded by Commissioner Miller, to approve the
EDA minutes as presented.
The motion passed 7-0.
4. Approval of Agenda
It was moved by Commissioner Lindberg, seconded by Commissioner Brausen, to approve
the EDA agenda as presented.
The motion passed 7-0.
5. Reports - None
6. Old Business - None
7. New Business
7a. Establishment of St. Louis Park Revolving Loan Fund and Amendment to the
EDA Bylaws. Resolution Nos. 16-04 and 16-05
Mr. Hunt presented the staff report. The proposed Revolving Loan Fund (RLF) program
was discussed at the February 16 Study Session. Under this program, the EDA would offer
fixed rate gap financing to new and expanding St. Louis Park businesses in conjunction
with loans offered through the Central Minnesota Development Company (CMDC) and
local lenders.
Mr. Hunt explained that financing would be available for such uses as land, buildings,
machinery and equipment. The benefit to borrowers would be lower down payments. The
proposed guidelines are attached to the staff report. The guidelines encourage women,
Economic Development Authority Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 3a) Page 2
Title: Economic Development Authority Meeting Minutes of March 21, 2016
minority and veteran-owned businesses to apply. Staff would make a final determination
of the loan application and would report to the EDA on any loan approvals. The proposed
loan could be brought back to the EDA for discussion if there is ambiguity in the
application’s conformance with the program’s guidelines.
Mr. Hunt stated that the authorization for the RLF requires an amendment to the EDA By-
laws. It is proposed that the EDA establish a RLF capitalized with $400,000 from the
Development Fund and contract with CMDC to administer the initiative. There would be
no direct charge to the EDA as it would be incurred by borrowers and the administrative
fees would be offset by interest income. CMDC would access a small fee of 1/12 of 2%
of the balance on the loans outstanding in the EDA’s portfolio. The president of CMDC is
here for questions. Staff recommends adoption of the proposed resolutions on the agenda
this evening.
It was moved by Commissioner Brausen, seconded by Commissioner Lindberg, to waive
the reading and adopt EDA Resolution No. 16-04, establishing the St. Louis Park
Revolving Loan Fund; and to waive the reading and adopt Resolution No. 16-05 amending
the EDA By-laws.
Commissioner Brausen stated he is really excited for this program as it encourages small
businesses to acquire financing to maintain their facilities and creates more economic
development for the City. The program incorporates green building and contains an equity
clause so the owners are also putting in money.
Commissioner Lindberg stated that he agrees with Commissioner Brausen’s statements. In
addition, this program really puts into action, items that the Council has discussed. The
program is a great move forward on behalf of the City as it gives small businesses extra
help.
Commissioner Miller also voiced his support of this program. He explained this program
complements the Open to Business Program. As a small business owner for 11 years, he
sees great benefit and would have reached out to the city had this program been in place
during the time that he was a business owner. He looks forward to the city increasing the
amount of support down the road and also looks forward to the city marketing this program.
Commissioner Sanger explained that she is also very supportive of this program as she has
had small businesses specifically ask for this program. CMDC is a nonprofit that provides
support for small businesses in Minnesota. When she met with CMDC, she asked the CEO
if there were any defaults on loans through this program and the answer is none. This is
very impressive.
Commissioner Mavity explained that she echoes the other Commissioners’ statements.
This program helps maintain a healthy local small business community for the city. She
asked if the language in the proposed amendment is outlined with specific steps in order to
encourage women-owned and minority-owned businesses. Mr. Hunt responded that staff
will be reaching out to a number of organizations that provide services to various groups
to make them aware of the program and encourage applications.
The motion passed 7-0.
7b. Establishment of the Wayzata Blvd Tax Increment Financing District.
Resolution Nos. 16-06 and 16-07.
Economic Development Authority Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 3a) Page 3
Title: Economic Development Authority Meeting Minutes of March 21, 2016
Mr. Hunt presented the staff report. In early 2012, it was determined that the former
Santorini’s restaurant located at 9920 Wayzata Boulevard was structurally unsafe, and it
was set for demolition. The building was demolished in February, 2013, and the garage
was removed in July, 2014. Statutorily, the EDA has three years from demolition to
establish a Tax Increment Financing (TIF) district. At the January 11 Study Session there
was a consensus of support from the EDA for establishing such a district.
Mr. Hunt explained that the primary issue with redeveloping the property is unstable
structural soils. Due to these soils, a developer would most likely apply for assistance from
the EDA in order for redevelopment to occur. In order to provide assistance for
development, a new TIF district needs to be established.
In summary, Mr. Hunt stated these resolutions call for the creation of a new TIF district
called the Wayzata Boulevard TIF District. The proposed TIF district consists of two
parcels: 9808 and 9920 Wayzata Boulevard. Within the proposed TIF plan, the boundaries
of the City’s redevelopment project area are being modified to be coterminous with the
city’s corporate boundaries.
Mr. Hunt explained that authorization of the TIF district does not in itself commit the EDA
to provide financing. Rather, the proposed TIF district creates the funding vehicle to
reimburse the developer for a portion of its qualified project costs. The EDA will have
four years after the district is certified to utilize tax increment created by the district. If by
that time no project materializes, the TIF district must be decertified. Staff recommends
adoption of the two proposed resolutions on tonight’s agenda.
It was moved by Commissioner Brausen, seconded by Commissioner Miller, to waive the
reading and adopt EDA Resolution No. 16-06, approving the establishment of the Wayzata
Blvd. Tax Increment Financing District within Redevelopment Project No. 1 (a
redevelopment district); and to waive the reading and adopt EDA Resolution No. 16-07,
authorizing an Interfund Loan for advance of certain costs in connection with the
administration of Wayzata Blvd. TIF District.
Commissioner Brausen clarified that this property is the old Santorini’s property. He
explained that the property is currently worth $2.5 million, but could be worth a lot more
if developed. He supports these resolutions and encourages the City to find a developer to
enhance the property.
The motion passed 7-0.
8. Communications - None
9. Adjournment
The meeting adjourned at 7:32 p.m.
______________________________________ ______________________________________
Melissa Kennedy, Secretary Anne Mavity, President
Meeting: Economic Development Authority
Meeting Date: May 2, 2016
Minutes: 3b
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
APRIL 4, 2016
1. Call to Order
President Mavity called the meeting to order at 7:28 p.m.
Commissioners present: President Anne Mavity, Tim Brausen, Steve Hallfin, Gregg Lindberg,
Susan Sanger, Thom Miller, and Jake Spano.
Commissioners absent: None.
Staff present: Executive Director (Mr. Harmening), City Attorney (Ms. McDowell Poehler),
Deputy City Manager/Human Resources Director (Ms. Deno), Communications Specialist (Ms.
Pribbenow), and Recording Secretary (Ms. Batra).
2. Roll Call
3. Approval of Minutes - None
4. Approval of Agenda
It was moved by Commissioner Spano, seconded by Commissioner Lindberg, to approve
the EDA agenda as presented.
The motion passed 7-0.
5. Reports
5a. Approval of EDA Disbursements
It was moved by Commissioner Spano, seconded by Commissioner Brausen, to approve
the EDA Disbursements as presented.
The motion passed 7-0.
6. Old Business - None
7. New Business - None
8. Communications - None
9. Adjournment
The meeting adjourned at 7:29 p.m.
______________________________________ ______________________________________
Melissa Kennedy, Secretary President
Meeting: Economic Development Authority
Meeting Date: May 2, 2016
Consent Agenda Item: 5a
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Approval of EDA Disbursements
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to accept for filing EDA Disbursement Claims for the
period of March 26 through April 22, 2016.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the EDA desire to approve EDA disbursements in
accordance with Article V – Administration of Finances, of the EDA Bylaws?
SUMMARY: The Accounting Division prepares this report on a monthly basis for the EDA to
review and approve. The attached reports show both EDA disbursements paid by physical check
and those by wire transfer or Automated Clearing House (ACH) when applicable.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Review and approval of the information
follows the EDA’s Bylaws and provides another layer of oversight to further ensure fiscal
stewardship.
VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: EDA Disbursements
Prepared by: Connie Neubeck, Account Clerk
Reviewed by: Steven Heintz, Interim Controller
4/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:13:50R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
1Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
4/22/20163/26/2016 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
33.00CAMPBELL KNUTSON PROF ASSOC PARK COMMONS G&A LEGAL SERVICES
33.00
11,946.94HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER DEVELOPMENT - EDA BALANCE SHEE DUE TO OTHER GOVTS
4,104.00DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A RENT REVENUE
16,050.94
247.00KENNEDY & GRAVEN MCGARVEY COFFEE SITE LEGAL SERVICES
120.00DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A LEGAL SERVICES
1,188.00PARK COMMONS G&A LEGAL SERVICES
1,555.00
5,000.00LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORP DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
5,000.00
4,015.72METRO TRANSIT COMMISSION DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
4,015.72
53,498.08ST LOUIS PARK CONV & VISITORS BUREAU CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU COST REIMBURSEMENT-CVB
53,498.08
Report Totals 80,152.74
Economic Development Authority Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 5a)
Title: Approval of EDA Disbursements Page 2
Meeting: Economic Development Authority
Meeting Date: May 2, 2016
Action Agenda Item: 7a
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Application for Environmental Grant Funds
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
1) Motion to Adopt EDA Resolution authorizing the Executive Director and President to submit
a grant application to the Metropolitan Council Tax Base Revitalization Grant Program on
behalf of the Parkdales project;
2) Motion to Adopt EDA Resolution authorizing the Executive Director and President to submit
a grant application to the Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED)
Contamination Clean-up Grant Program on behalf of the Parkway 25 project;
3) Motion to Adopt EDA Resolution authorizing the Executive Director and President to submit
a grant application to the Metropolitan Council Tax Base Revitalization Grant Program on
behalf of the Parkway 25 project;
4) Motion to Adopt EDA Resolution authorizing the Executive Director and President to submit
a grant application to the Hennepin County Environmental Response Fund Program on
behalf of the Parkway 25 project.
5) Motion to Adopt EDA Resolution authorizing the Executive Director and President to submit
a grant application to the Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED)
Contamination Clean-up Grant Program on behalf of the Morries Automotive project;
6) Motion to Adopt EDA Resolution authorizing the Executive Director and President to submit
a grant application to the Metropolitan Council Tax Base Revitalization Grant Program on
behalf of the Morries Automotive project;
7) Motion to Adopt EDA Resolution authorizing the Executive Director and President to submit
a grant application to the Hennepin County Environmental Response Fund Program on
behalf of the Morries Automotive project.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the EDA support submitting grant applications on behalf
of the above developers to assist in environmental cleanup of their respective properties?
SUMMARY: Please refer to the Discussion section for the summary. Note that staff provided a
study session report on this matter for the April 25 meeting.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The EDA is the designated applicant for
each grant but has no financial obligations other than to serve as the conduit for the grant funds.
VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a leader in environmental
stewardship. We will increase environmental consciousness and responsibility in all areas of city
business.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion
EDA Resolutions
Prepared by: Julie Grove, Economic Development Specialist
Reviewed by: Greg Hunt, Economic Development Coordinator
Michele Schnitker, Housing Supervisor/Deputy CD Director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, Executive Director/City Manager
Economic Development Authority Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 7a) Page 2
Title: Application for Environmental Grant Funds
DISCUSSION
SUMMARY: Three proposed redevelopments -The Parkdales, Parkway 25 and Morries
Automotive - are in various stages of project planning approvals with the city. All three
developers have discovered that their sites are impacted with soil contamination or the buildings
require asbestos and lead removal. A summary of each proposed redevelopment project and
cleanup request is below.
To assist with cleanup costs, the developers are requesting that the EDA apply for approximately
$2,652,000 in grants from Hennepin County, the Metropolitan Council and DEED on their
behalf. Environmental grants for contamination cleanup are awarded semi-annually. These grant
applications are due in early May (grant applications are due May and November). Each grant
requires a resolution from the governing body of the city where the project site is located
indicating that it supports the project. Grant awards are typically announced in July.
Funding is not being requested from the EDA in connection with these grant applications. The
DEED grants require the applicant or other local source to pay for 25 percent of the project cost
as a local match to obtain a cleanup grant. Grants from Hennepin County and Metropolitan
Council could cover up to 13 percent of this match and the Developers have agreed to pay the
remaining amounts.
An authorizing resolution for each grant application is attached.
BACKGROUND:
PARKDALE DEVELOPMENT
The Excelsior Group recently purchased the Parkdale office development for $40 million. It is
located in the southwest quadrant of I-394 and Minnesota Hwy. 100 in St. Louis Park’s West
End District. Parkdale Center, formerly the Gambles Building, is a Class B office building
totaling 198,939 square feet. It was constructed in 1968 as the corporate headquarters of
Gamble-Skogmo Inc., the parent of Red Owl Grocery, Snyder Drug, and several other retail
companies. In approximately 1980, Gamble-Skogmo vacated the building. In subsequent years,
the building was re-branded as Parkdale Center, and it was re-leased as a multi-tenant office
building. Presently, two office tenants and a large HealthPartners clinic occupy approximately
45% of the overall building. The remaining space is vacant. The Excelsior Group plans to
invest up to $12.5 million on building and site renovations.
Given its age, Parkdale Center is in significant need of renovation in order to attract and serve
the needs of today’s office users. The scope of the renovation project includes replacement of all
windows and window frames, removal of some exterior brick and staircases, construction of a
new entry and lobby, building renovations, construction of a new patio area and installation of a
new energy management system.
During its due diligence, The Excelsior Group discovered asbestos–containing materials and lead
in portions of the building. A Tax Base Revitalization Account grant is being sought from the
Metropolitan Council to offset costs for abatement of asbestos and lead that will be encountered
during the renovation project. The estimated cost associated with asbestos and lead abatement for
the project is $1,472,000.
Economic Development Authority Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 7a) Page 3
Title: Application for Environmental Grant Funds
PARKWAY 25
Sela Group recently acquired the Vescio Cucina Restaurant and Valu Stay Inn sites at 4001
County Road 25 and 4025 Highway 7 respectively. The city has received PUD and Plat
applications from Sela Group to redevelop the properties with a five-story, mixed-use building.
The proposed development consists of 105 market rate apartment units and 14,500 square feet of
ground floor commercial/office space (approximately 1,000 square feet of that space is being
marketed for a coffee shop) on a combined 1.57 acre parcel. The development includes surface
and underground parking and outdoor amenity space. Staff is currently evaluating the
applications for completeness. At this point the developer is not requesting financial assistance
from the EDA. A neighborhood meeting was held January 18th for this redevelopment project.
A public hearing for the PUD and Plat will be held in late May at Planning Commission. It is
anticipated that City Council will consider the applications in late June.
The redevelopment of the Parkway 25 site will entail the environmental cleanup of building
materials and contaminated soil. These cleanup-related tasks include abating the asbestos/lead-
based paint from the existing structures, demolition of the existing structures, removal and
disposal of identified contaminated soil and associated suspected wood foundation piles, clean
fill import, environmental reporting/monitoring/consultation and the associated Minnesota
Pollution Control Agency oversight fees. The total cleanup costs are estimated to be
approximately $550,000. Grant funds are being requested from the Department of Employment
and Economic Development (DEED) Cleanup Grant, the Metropolitan Council Tax Base
Revitalization Account (TBRA) Contamination Cleanup Grant, and the Hennepin County
Environmental Response Fund. It should be noted that approving authorizing resolutions for the
grants does not mean the City Council will approve the PUD and Plat applications. Any future
project on the site will have to remove the contaminated soil and building materials prior to
redevelopment.
MORRIES AUTOMOTIVE
Morries Automotive plans to add a Lincoln dealership next to its existing Hyundai dealership on
Wayzata Boulevard. The proposed Morries dealership consists of two adjoining parcels totaling
2.76 acres developed with the former Bennigans and Woodfire Grill restaurants; located at 6475
and 6501 Wayzata Boulevard in St. Louis Park. The two buildings located on site were
constructed in 1967 and 1977 and are currently vacant. The proposed redevelopment includes
demolition of the two existing buildings and construction of a 21,632 square foot slab-on-grade
auto dealership building, asphalt parking lots, utilities and a storm water retention system. A
Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a new car dealership (originally for a Kia dealership) on this
site was approved in November 2014, and the CUP was extended in November 2015.
Construction is anticipated late this summer.
The site and surrounding areas were formerly occupied by wetlands until the mid-1940s when
fill materials were imported to the site. Several environmental investigations have been
completed to date and have indicated that fill materials, including wood, metal, brick and
concrete debris were buried at the site. Investigations also found that the fill soils were impacted
with high levels of petroleum product and other hazardous substance impacts to the soils and
groundwater. Depths of the fill material were reported up to 15 feet below ground surface. In
addition, asbestos containing materials have been identified in the existing structures.
Economic Development Authority Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 7a) Page 4
Title: Application for Environmental Grant Funds
To help offset the additional costs related to the environmental contamination during
redevelopment, approximately $630,000 total in grant funds are being requested. The grant funds
are being requested from a combination of the Department of Employment and Economic
Development (DEED) Cleanup Grant, the Metropolitan Council Tax Base Revitalization
Account (TBRA) Contamination Cleanup Grant, and the Hennepin County Environmental
Response Fund.
NEXT STEPS:
Upon adoption of the proposed resolutions, staff will proceed with the following schedule:
May 3, 2016: Submit the authorizing resolutions and applications to each granting agency.
July 2016: Grant awards will be announced.
Economic Development Authority Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 7a) Page 5
Title: Application for Environmental Grant Funds
EDA RESOLUTION NO. 16-____
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR THE
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL TAX BASE REVITALIZATION ACCOUNT
ON BEHALF OF THE PARKDALES
WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park is a participant in the Livable Communities Act's
Housing Incentives Program for 2016 as determined by the Metropolitan Council, and is
therefore eligible to make application for funds under the Tax Base Revitalization Account; and
WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority has identified a clean-
up project within the City that meets the Tax Base Revitalization account's purposes and criteria;
and
WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority has the institutional,
managerial and financial capability to ensure adequate project administration; and
WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority certifies that it will
comply with all applicable laws and regulations as stated in the contract agreements; and
WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority agrees to act as legal
sponsor for the project contained in the Tax Base Revitalization Account grant application
submitted on May 2, 2016;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the President and Executive Director are
hereby authorized to apply to the Metropolitan Council for a Tax Base Revitalization Account
grant on behalf of the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority and to execute such
agreements as are necessary to implement the project on behalf of the applicant.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the Economic Development
Authority , May 2, 2016
Executive Director President
Attest
Secretary
Economic Development Authority Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 7a) Page 6
Title: Application for Environmental Grant Funds
EDA RESOLUTION NO. 16-____
RESOLUTION APPROVING A GRANT APPLICATION TO THE DEPARTMENT OF
EMPLOYMENT AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND APPROVING LOCAL
MATCHING FUNDS ON BEHALF OF PARKWAY 25
WHEREAS, the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority has agreed to act as the legal
sponsor for the Project referred to as Parkway 25, contained in the Contamination Cleanup Grant
application submitted to the Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED)
on or before May 2, 2016; and
WHEREAS, the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority has the legal authority to
apply for financial assistance, and the institutional, managerial, and financial capability to ensure
adequate project administration; and
WHEREAS, the sources and amounts of the local match identified in the application are
committed to the project identified and the advance of such funds is subject to the final approval
of the Economic Development Authority; and
WHEREAS, the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority has not violated any Federal,
State or local laws pertaining to fraud, bribery, graft, kickbacks, collusion, conflict of interest or
other unlawful or corrupt practice; and
WHEREAS, upon approval of its application by the state, the St. Louis Park Economic
Development Authority may enter into an agreement with the State of Minnesota for the above
referenced Project, and that the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority certifies that it
will comply with all applicable laws and regulation as stated in all contract agreements;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the President and Executive Director are
hereby authorized to apply to the Department of Employment and Economic Development for
funding of this project on behalf of the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority and
execute such agreements as are necessary to implement the Project on behalf of the applicant.
I CERTIFY THAT the above resolution was adopted by the St. Louis Park Economic
Development Authority on, May 2, 2016.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the Economic Development
Authority, May 2, 2016
Executive Director President
Attest
Secretary
Economic Development Authority Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 7a) Page 7
Title: Application for Environmental Grant Funds
EDA RESOLUTION NO. 16-____
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR THE
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL TAX BASE REVITALIZATION ACCOUNT
ON BEHALF OF PARKWAY 25
WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park is a participant in the Livable Communities Act's
Housing Incentives Program for 2016 as determined by the Metropolitan Council, and is
therefore eligible to make application for funds under the Tax Base Revitalization Account; and
WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority has identified a clean-
up project within the City that meets the Tax Base Revitalization account's purposes and criteria;
and
WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority has the institutional,
managerial and financial capability to ensure adequate project administration; and
WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority certifies that it will
comply with all applicable laws and regulations as stated in the contract agreements; and
WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority agrees to act as legal
sponsor for the project contained in the Tax Base Revitalization Account grant application
submitted on May 2, 2016;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the President and Executive Director are
hereby authorized to apply to the Metropolitan Council for a Tax Base Revitalization Account
grant on behalf of the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority and to execute such
agreements as are necessary to implement the project on behalf of the applicant.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the Economic Development
Authority , May 2, 2016
Executive Director President
Attest
Secretary
Economic Development Authority Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 7a) Page 8
Title: Application for Environmental Grant Funds
EDA RESOLUTION NO. 16-____
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR A GRANT FROM
HENNEPIN COUNTY’S ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE FUND
ON BEHALF OF PARKWAY 25
WHEREAS, the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority is eligible to make
application for grant funds from Hennepin County’s Environmental Response Fund; and
WHEREAS, the grant funds will be used for environmental clean-up of Parkway 25 site located
at 4001 County Road 25 and 4025 Highway 7 in the City of St. Louis Park; and
WHEREAS, the State Statute which created the Environmental Response Fund requires
approval by the governing body of the EDA for submission of a grant request to the Hennepin
County Environmental Response Fund; and
WHEREAS, the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority has the institutional,
managerial and financial capability to ensure adequate project administration for any grant funds
received; and
WHEREAS, the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority certifies that it will comply
with all applicable laws and regulations as stated in the contract agreements; and
WHEREAS, the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority agrees to act as legal sponsor
for the project contained in the Environmental Response Fund grant application to be submitted
on or before May 2, 2016;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of St. Louis Park Economic
Development Authority supports Parkway 25 project, for which an Environmental Response
Fund grant application is being submitted for program eligible activities, and that the President
and Executive Director are hereby authorized to apply to Hennepin County for an Environmental
Response Fund grant on behalf of the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority on or
before May 2, 2016 and execute such agreements as are necessary to implement the project on
behalf of the applicant.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the Economic Development
Authority, May 2, 2016
Executive Director President
Attest
Secretary
Economic Development Authority Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 7a) Page 9
Title: Application for Environmental Grant Funds
EDA RESOLUTION NO. 16-____
RESOLUTION APPROVING A GRANT APPLICATION TO THE DEPARTMENT OF
EMPLOYMENT AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND APPROVING LOCAL
MATCHING FUNDS ON BEHALF OF MORRIES AUTOMOTIVE
WHEREAS, the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority has agreed to act as the legal
sponsor for the Project referred to as Morries Automotive, contained in the Contamination
Cleanup Grant application submitted to the Department of Employment and Economic
Development (DEED) on or before May 2, 2016; and
WHEREAS, the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority has the legal authority to
apply for financial assistance, and the institutional, managerial, and financial capability to ensure
adequate project administration; and
WHEREAS, the sources and amounts of the local match identified in the application are
committed to the project identified and the advance of such funds is subject to the final approval
of the Economic Development Authority; and
WHEREAS, the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority has not violated any Federal,
State or local laws pertaining to fraud, bribery, graft, kickbacks, collusion, conflict of interest or
other unlawful or corrupt practice; and
WHEREAS, upon approval of its application by the state, the St. Louis Park Economic
Development Authority may enter into an agreement with the State of Minnesota for the above
referenced Project, and that the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority certifies that it
will comply with all applicable laws and regulation as stated in all contract agreements;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the President and Executive Director are
hereby authorized to apply to the Department of Employment and Economic Development for
funding of this project on behalf of the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority and
execute such agreements as are necessary to implement the Project on behalf of the applicant.
I CERTIFY THAT the above resolution was adopted by the St. Louis Park Economic
Development Authority on, May 2, 2016.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the Economic Development
Authority, May 2, 2016
Executive Director President
Attest
Secretary
Economic Development Authority Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 7a) Page 10
Title: Application for Environmental Grant Funds
EDA RESOLUTION NO. 16-____
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR THE
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL TAX BASE REVITALIZATION ACCOUNT
ON BEHALF OF MORRIES AUTOMOTIVE
WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park is a participant in the Livable Communities Act's
Housing Incentives Program for 2016 as determined by the Metropolitan Council, and is
therefore eligible to make application for funds under the Tax Base Revitalization Account; and
WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority has identified a clean-
up project within the City that meets the Tax Base Revitalization account's purposes and criteria;
and
WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority has the institutional,
managerial and financial capability to ensure adequate project administration; and
WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority certifies that it will
comply with all applicable laws and regulations as stated in the contract agreements; and
WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority agrees to act as legal
sponsor for the project contained in the Tax Base Revitalization Account grant application
submitted on May 2, 2016;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the President and Executive Director are
hereby authorized to apply to the Metropolitan Council for a Tax Base Revitalization Account
grant on behalf of the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority and to execute such
agreements as are necessary to implement the project on behalf of the applicant.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the Economic Development
Authority , May 2, 2016
Executive Director President
Attest
Secretary
Economic Development Authority Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 7a) Page 11
Title: Application for Environmental Grant Funds
EDA RESOLUTION NO. 16-____
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR A GRANT FROM
HENNEPIN COUNTY’S ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE FUND
ON BEHALF OF MORRIES AUTOMOTIVE
WHEREAS, the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority is eligible to make
application for grant funds from Hennepin County’s Environmental Response Fund; and
WHEREAS, the grant funds will be used for environmental clean-up of Morries Automotive site
located at 6475 and 6501 Wayzata Boulevard in the City of St. Louis Park; and
WHEREAS, the State Statute which created the Environmental Response Fund requires
approval by the governing body of the EDA for submission of a grant request to the Hennepin
County Environmental Response Fund; and
WHEREAS, the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority has the institutional,
managerial and financial capability to ensure adequate project administration for any grant funds
received; and
WHEREAS, the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority certifies that it will comply
with all applicable laws and regulations as stated in the contract agreements; and
WHEREAS, the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority agrees to act as legal sponsor
for the project contained in the Environmental Response Fund grant application to be submitted
on or before May 2, 2016;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of St. Louis Park Economic
Development Authority supports Morries Automotive project, for which an Environmental
Response Fund grant application is being submitted for program eligible activities, and that the
President and Executive Director are hereby authorized to apply to Hennepin County for an
Environmental Response Fund grant on behalf of the St. Louis Park Economic Development
Authority on or before May 2, 2016 and execute such agreements as are necessary to implement
the project on behalf of the applicant.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the Economic Development
Authority, May 2, 2016
Executive Director President
Attest
Secretary
Meeting: Economic Development Authority
Meeting Date: May 2, 2016
Action Agenda Item: 7b
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Third Amendment to Central Park West Redevelopment Contract
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt EDA Resolution approving the Third
Amendment to the Contract for Private Redevelopment with Central Park West, LLC.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the EDA support modifying the required commencement
and completion dates of the apartment and office buildings as specified in the Third Amendment
to the Contract for Private Redevelopment with Central Park West, LLC?
SUMMARY: In light of unavoidable delays due to utility work and market demand for office
space, the Redevelopers responsible for constructing Central Park West Phases I, II, IV, and V
have requested that the required project commencement and completion dates for their respective
phases be modified as follows:
PROPOSED REVISED CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The proposed contract extensions reflect
the current construction and economic realities related to the various phases of the Central Park
West redevelopment. The construction delay means that the original Redeveloper’s (Duke
Realty) reimbursement of TIF-eligible expenses related to the Central Park West portion of the
overall West End project will likewise be delayed. Once the subject properties are redeveloped
and fully assessed, Duke’s TIF payments will increase.
VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion
EDA Resolution
Proposed Third Amendment
Prepared by: Greg Hunt, Economic Development Coordinator
Reviewed by: Kevin Locke, Community Development Director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, EDA Executive Director, and City Manager
Central Park West
Phase
Required
Commencement
Date
Revised
Commencement
Date
(Proposed)
Required
Completion
Date
Revised
Completion
Date
(Proposed)
Phase I
(apartment building #1)
June 1, 2015 November 28,
2015
December 31,
2016
June 30,
2017
Phase II
(apartment building #2)
April 1, 2016 October 2,
2017
August 31,
2017
March 4,
2019
Phase III
(hotel)
April 1, 2016 No Change August 31,
2017
No Change
Phase IV
(office building #1)
April 1, 2016 April 1,
2017
September 30,
2017
September 30,
2018
Phase V
(office building #2)
April 1, 2019 April 1,
2020
September 30,
2020
September 30,
2021
Economic Development Authority Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 7b) Page 2
Title: Third Amendment to Central Park West Redevelopment Contract
DISCUSSION
The EDA and City adopted a Second Amendment to the Contract for Private Redevelopment
with Central Park West, LLC, on December 15, 2014 related to the Central Park West
redevelopment located at the SW quadrant of I-394 and Highway 100. Responsibility for
constructing project Phases I & II (a 199-unit apartment building and 164-unit apartment
building) were retained by Central Park West, LLC (an affiliate of DLC Residential).
Responsibility for constructing Phase III (hotel) was subsequently assigned to RISLP, LLC (an
affiliate of TPI Hospitality). Responsibility for constructing project Phases IV and V (one
353,353 SF Class A multi-story office building per phase) was subsequently assigned to OP4
SLP, LLC (an affiliate of The Excelsior Group).
Under the Second Amendment, the Required Construction Commencement and Completion Dates
for the various project phases (subject to unavoidable delays) were established as follows:
Phase
Required
Commencement
Date
Required
Completion
Date
Central Park West Phase I
(multi-family housing)
June 1, 2015 December 31, 2016
Central Park West Phase II
(multi-family housing)
April 1, 2016 August 31, 2017
Central Park West Phase III
(hotel)
April 1, 2016 August 31, 2017
Central Park West Phase IV
(office)
April 1, 2016 September 30, 2017
Central Park West Phase V
(office)
April 1, 2019 September 30, 2020
Central Park West Phase VI
(future redevelopment)
TBD TBD
If the Redeveloper anticipated that the timetable for any Phase would not be met, the Redeveloper
was to provide a report to the City describing the reasons for the expected failure to meet the
schedule, evidence of Redeveloper’s due diligence in working toward construction of the relevant
Phase, and a detailed revised schedule.
Staff has received a report from Central Park West, LLC indicating that it began construction on
the first apartment building later than planned due to the Met Council sanitary sewer work at the
south end of the Central Park West site. The Met Council work then delayed the required utility
work on Utica Avenue (adjacent to the Phase I site) which included location of a temporary
sanitary line through the center of the project site. Central Park West, LLC couldn’t commence
construction of the first apartment building until the sanitary line was relocated out of the
building footprint. As a result, it was unable to begin construction on Phase I until late
November rather than in June as required. This unavoidable delay will push back the completion
date of Phase I and consequently commencement of Phase II. The Redeveloper has therefore
requested that the completion date for Phase I be extended until June 30, 2017. In light of this
schedule revision, the Central Park West, LLC has also requested that the commencement date
for the Phase II apartment building be extended until October 2, 2017 and its completion date be
extended until March 4, 2019.
Economic Development Authority Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 7b) Page 3
Title: Third Amendment to Central Park West Redevelopment Contract
The Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) for the Phase III hotel (a six story,
126-room AC Hotel by Marriott) was approved by the City Council on April 4th. TPI Hospitality
expects to break ground shortly and complete the project by late summer next year as required so
no revision for the construction schedule for Phase III is necessary.
Staff has also received a report from The Excelsior Group expressing that demand in the local
office market required a cautious approach before it could commit to constructing a speculative
office building in the area. However, now that economic conditions have improved, it has begun
preparing plans for the Phase IV office building and is currently pursuing project financing. The
315,000 square Class A office building, called Ten West End, will be the first multitenant office
building constructed along the Interstate 394 corridor in more than 16 years. The Redeveloper
and its project partner, Ryan Companies, are scheduled to discuss initial concept plans at the
May 9th Study Session and hold a neighborhood meeting May 11th. The partners then expect to
make formal plan submittals during the summer, obtain plan approvals in fall/early winter and
commence construction in spring 2017. The Redeveloper has therefore requested that the
commencement and completion dates for Phase IV be extended until April 1, 2017 and
September 30, 2018 respectively. In allowance for a reasonable building lease-up period, The
Excelsior Group has also requested that the commencement date for the subsequent Phase V
office building be extended until April 1, 2020 and its completion date be extended to September
30, 2021.
Thus, it is proposed that the Central Park West Redevelopers commence construction of Phases I,
II, IV, and V by the Required Commencement Dates, and substantially complete them by the
Required Completion Dates, subject to unavoidable delays, all according to the revised
construction schedule as follows:
REVISED CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE
The Redevelopers have therefore requested a Third Amendment to the Central Park West
Redevelopment Contract reflecting the above revised Construction Schedule (attached).
Central Park West
Phase
Required
Commencement
Date
Revised
Commencement
Date
(Proposed)
Required
Completion
Date
Revised
Completion
Date
(Proposed)
Phase I
(apartment building #1)
June 1, 2015 November 28,
2015
December 31,
2016
June 30,
2017
Phase II
(apartment building #2)
April 1, 2016 October 2,
2017
August 31,
2017
March 4,
2019
Phase III
(hotel)
April 1, 2016 No Change August 31,
2017
No Change
Phase IV
(office building #1)
April 1, 2016 April 1,
2017
September 30,
2017
September 30,
2018
Phase V
(office building #2)
April 1, 2019 April 1,
2020
September 30,
2020
September 30,
2021
Economic Development Authority Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 7b) Page 4
Title: Third Amendment to Central Park West Redevelopment Contract
ST. LOUIS PARK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
EDA RESOLUTION NO. 16-____
RESOLUTION APPROVING A THIRD AMENDMENT TO
AMENDED AND RESTATED CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE
REDEVELOPMENT AMONG THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK,
THE ST. LOUIS PARK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY, CENTRAL PARK WEST, LLC AND RELATED
REDEVELOPER ENTITIES
BE IT RESOLVED By the Board of Commissioners ("Board") of the St. Louis Park
Economic Development Authority ("Authority") as follows:
Section 1. Recitals.
1.01. The Authority is currently administering its Redevelopment Project No. 1 ("Project")
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047 ("HRA Act"), and within the Project
has established The West End Tax Increment Financing District (“TIF District”).
1.02. The Authority, the City of St. Louis Park (“City”), and Duke Realty Limited
Partnership (“Duke”) entered into an Amended and Restated Contract for Private Redevelopment
Dated as of May 17, 2010, as amended (the “Contract”), regarding redevelopment of a portion of
the property within the TIF District.
1.03. Duke assigned its obligations under the Contract to Central Park West, LLC
(“CPW”), and CPW has assigned certain of its obligations under the Contract to Millenium Phase
II, LLC, OP4 SLP, LLC, and RISLP, LLC, all pursuant to various Assignment and Assumption
instruments approved by the Authority (such entities collectively the “Redeveloper Entities”).
1.04. The parties to the Contract have determined to a need to revise the Contract in
certain respects, and to that end have prepared a Third Amendment to Amended and Restated
Contract for Private Redevelopment (the “Third Amendment”), by and among the Authority, the
City, and the Redeveloper Entities.
1.05. The Board has reviewed the Third Amendment and finds that the approval and
execution thereof and performance of the Authority's obligations thereunder are in the best interest
of the City and its residents.
Section 2. Authority Approval; Other Proceedings.
2.01. The Third Amendment as presented to the Board is hereby in all respects approved,
subject to modifications that do not alter the substance of the transaction and that are approved by
the President and Executive Director, provided that execution of the documents by such officials
shall be conclusive evidence of approval.
Economic Development Authority Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 7b) Page 5
Title: Third Amendment to Central Park West Redevelopment Contract
2.02. The President and Executive Director are hereby authorized to execute on behalf of
the Authority the Third Amendment and any documents referenced therein requiring execution by
the Authority, and to carry out, on behalf of the Authority its obligations thereunder.
2.03. Authority staff and consultants are authorized to take any actions necessary to carry
out the intent of this resolution.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the Economic
Development Authority May 2, 2016
Thomas K. Harmening,
Executive Director
Anne Mavity, President
Attest
Secretary
Economic Development Authority Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 7b) Page 6
Title: Third Amendment to Central Park West Redevelopment Contract
THIRD AMENDMENT TO
AMENDED AND RESTATED CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE REDEVELOPMENT
This Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Contract for Private Redevelopment
(“Amendment”), dated as of May 2, 2016, by and between the CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK, a
Minnesota municipal corporation (the “City”), ST. LOUIS PARK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY, a public body corporate and politic under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the
“Authority”), CENTRAL PARK WEST, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (“CPW”),
MILLENNIUM PHASE II, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (“Millennium Phase II”),
OP4 SLP, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (“OP4”), and RISLP, LLC, a Minnesota
limited liability company (“RISLP” and, together with CPW, Millennium, and OP4, as their interests
appear, the “Redeveloper”);
WITNESSETH:
A. The Authority currently administers Redevelopment Project No. 1 (the “Redevelopment
Project”) and the West End Tax Increment Financing District within the Redevelopment Project (the
“TIF District”), pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047 (the “HRA Act”) and
Sections 469.174 to 469.1799, as amended (the “TIF Act”).
B. The Authority, the City, and Duke Realty Limited Partnership (“Duke”) entered into an
Amended and Restated Contract for Private Redevelopment dated May 17, 2010, recorded as Document
No. 4781478, amended by a First Amendment thereto dated November 21, 2011 recorded as Document
No. 4913709 (as so amended, the “Contract”), which described the parties’ respective responsibilities
regarding redevelopment of certain property in the TIF District (referred to as the “Redevelopment
Property”).
C. On September 11, 2013, Duke assigned its interests in the Contract as to a portion of the
Redevelopment Property described as Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 2, Block 1, The Shops at West End to
Millennium at West End, LLC (“Millenium”), pursuant to an Assignment and Assumption of
Redevelopment Contract, recorded in the office of the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles as Document
No. T05115015. A certificate of completion has been issued for Lot 1, Block 1, The Shops at West End,
described below as Phase IIC (multifamily).
D. Millennium has subsequently assigned its interests in the Contract as to Lot 2, Block 1,
The Shops at West End (the “Olive Garden Property”) to Millennium Phase II, an Affiliate (as such
term is defined in the Contract), pursuant to an Assignment and Assumption of Redevelopment Contract
dated as of April __, 2016. The Olive Garden Property is described below as Central Park West Phase
VI.
E. On May 8, 2015, Duke assigned its interests in the Contract to CPW pursuant to an
Assignment and Assumption of Redevelopment Contract, recorded in the office of the Hennepin County
Registrar of Titles as Documents No. T05254066 and T05258753, and simultaneously therewith, the
City, the Authority, Duke, and CPW entered into a Second Amendment to Amended and Restated
Contract for Private Redevelopment, recorded in the office of the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles as
Document No. T05254067 (the “Amended Contract”), relating to the Olive Garden Property and the
portion of the Redevelopment Property described as Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1 and Outlot A, Central Park
West P.U.D. No. 121.
Economic Development Authority Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 7b) Page 7
Title: Third Amendment to Central Park West Redevelopment Contract
F. Millennium was inadvertently excluded as a party to the Amended Contract, but
Millennium Phase II, as assignee of Millennium and as the owner of the Olive Garden Property and
Redeveloper of Central Park West Phase VI, agrees and acknowledges that it is subject to the Amended
Contract and to this Third Amendment.
G. In accordance with the Amended Contract, and pursuant to separate Assignment and
Assumptions of Redevelopment Contract, both dated as of May 8, 2015 and recorded in the office of the
Hennepin County Registrar of Titles as Documents No. T05254076 and T05254079, CPW has assigned
(i) to OP4, CPW’s rights in and obligations under the Amended Contract with respect to Central Park
West Phase IV and Central Park West Phase V, which phases relate to the portion of the Redevelopment
Property described as Outlot A, Central Park West P.U.D. No. 121, and (ii) to RISLP, CPW’s rights in
and obligations under the Amended Contract with respect to Central Park West Phase III, which phase
relates to the portion of the Redevelopment Property described as Lot 3, Block 1, Central Park West
P.U.D. No. 121.
H. Due to unavoidable delays in the construction of certain of the Phases of the
Minimum Improvements, the parties have now agreed to modify certain terms and conditions of the
Amended Contract as set forth below.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual obligations of the
parties hereto, each of them does hereby covenant and agree with the other as follows:
1. Amendment to Schedule G of the Contract. Schedule G of the Contract is amended
as follows:
CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE
Phase Required
Commencement Date
Required Completion
Date
Phase I
(Demolition and 16 St.)
December 18, 2007 August 1, 2009*
Phase IIA
(Retail and office; West End Blvd.)
July 1, 2008 June 1, 2010**
Phase IIC (multifamily housing) March 1, 2014 December 31, 2016***
Central Park West Phase I (multifamily housing) November 28, 2015 June 30, 2017
Central Park West Phase II (multifamily housing) October 2, 2017 March 4, 2019
Central Park West Phase III (hotel) April 1, 2016 August 31, 2017
Central Park West Phase IV (office) April 1, 2017 September 30, 2018
Central Park West Phase V (office) April 1, 2020 September 30, 2021
Central Park West Phase VI (TBD) TBD TBD
*Phase I is complete and a Certificate of Completion has been delivered for this Phase.
**Phase IIA is complete and a Certificate of Completion has been delivered for this Phase.
***Phase IIC is complete and a Certificate of Completion has been delivered for this Phase.
Economic Development Authority Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 7b) Page 8
Title: Third Amendment to Central Park West Redevelopment Contract
2. Miscellaneous. Except as amended by this Amendment, the Amended Contract shall
remain in full force and effect. Upon execution, Redeveloper shall reimburse the Authority for all
out-of pocket-costs incurred by the Authority in connection with negotiating, drafting and approval
of this Amendment. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, all of which
taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
Economic Development Authority Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 7b) Page 9
Title: Third Amendment to Central Park West Redevelopment Contract
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City, the Authority and the Redeveloper have caused this
Amendment to be duly executed by their duly authorized representatives.
CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK
By
Its Mayor
By
Its City Manager
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) SS.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of _________,
2016, by Jacob Spano and Tom Harmening, the Mayor and City Manager of the City of St. Louis
Park, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the City.
Notary Public
ST. LOUIS PARK ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
By
Its President
By
Its Executive Director
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) SS.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of _________,
2016, by Anne Mavity and Tom Harmening, the President and Executive Director of the St.
Louis Park Economic Development Authority, a public body corporate and politic under the laws
of the State of Minnesota, on behalf of the Authority.
Notary Public
(City and Authority Signature Page to Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Contract)
Economic Development Authority Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 7b) Page 10
Title: Third Amendment to Central Park West Redevelopment Contract
CENTRAL PARK WEST, LLC
By _________________________
Its Managing Member
STATE OF FLORIDA )
) SS.
COUNTY OF _______ )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of _________,
2016, by Ruslan Krivoruchko, the Managing Member of Central Park West, LLC, a Minnesota
limited liability company, on behalf of the company.
Notary Public
OP4 SLP, LLC
By
Its _______________________
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) SS.
COUNTY OF _______ )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of _________,
2016, by _________________, the _________________ of OP4 SLP, LLC, a Minnesota limited
liability company, on behalf of the company.
Notary Public
(Redeveloper Signature Page to Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Contract)
Economic Development Authority Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 7b) Page 11
Title: Third Amendment to Central Park West Redevelopment Contract
MILLENNIUM PHASE II, LLC
By _________________________________
Its Managing Member
STATE OF FLORIDA )
) SS.
COUNTY OF __________ )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of _________,
2016, by Ruslan Krivoruchko, the Managing Member of Millennium Phase II, LLC, a Minnesota
limited liability company, on behalf of the company.
Notary Public
RISLP, LLC
By
Its _______________________
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) SS.
COUNTY OF __________ )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of _________,
2016, by ________________, the __________________ of RISLP, LLC, a Minnesota limited
liability company, on behalf of the company.
Notary Public
(Redeveloper Signature Page to Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Contract)
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: May 2, 2016
Presentation: 2a
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: St. Louis Park Parktacular Ambassadors Introduction & Recap of Year
RECOMMENDED ACTION: The 2015-2016 St. Louis Park Parktacular Ambassadors will be
in attendance to introduce themselves to the City Council. They will share information about their
year as Ambassadors and some things they have learned from representing the community.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: None
SUMMARY: St. Louis Park Parktacular Ambassadors visit communities in the Twin Cities area
and western Wisconsin. Besides representing the festival, they promote the City of St. Louis Park
and the excellent schools. As an inclusive program, St. Louis Park is one of three communities
(Hopkins and Woodbury being the others) who have representation from children, young adults,
and seniors. Parktacular is the only program that has consistently had young men representing the
City, as well as racial and ethnic diversity. Ambassadors are public servants and promote St. Louis
Park as a place where all ages, religions, and ethnicities can live, learn, and participate in a strong
community.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged
community.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: None
Prepared by: Debbie Fischer, Administrative Services Office Assistant
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: May 2, 2016
Presentation: 2b
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Teacher Appreciation Week Proclamation
RECOMMENDED ACTION: The Mayor is asked to read the attached Proclamation honoring
and recognizing all teachers for their service and commitment to St. Louis Park. Superintendent
Rob Metz, Park Association of Teachers President Nathan Tangen and teachers from our St.
Louis Park Schools will be in attendance to accept this honor.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: None at this time.
SUMMARY: The City of St. Louis Park appreciates the commitment and dedication of teachers
who serve our community. They are vital to our future as a devoted and productive community
and integral to our vision of being a connected and engaged community.
In recognition of Teacher Appreciation Week, staff requests that City Council honor and
encourage thanks to all of our teachers for their service to the community and recognize the
contributions they have made.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged
community.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Proclamation
Prepared by: Debbie Fischer, Administrative Services Office Assistant
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 2b) Page 2
Title: Teacher Appreciation Week Proclamation
PROCLAMATION
Teacher Appreciation Week
May 2 – 6, 2016
WHEREAS, teachers mold future citizens through guidance and education; and
WHEREAS, teachers encounter schools of widely differing backgrounds; and
WHEREAS, our country’s future depends upon providing quality education to all
students; and
WHEREAS, teachers spend countless hours preparing lessons, evaluating progress,
counseling and coaching students and performing community service; and
WHEREAS, our community recognizes and supports its teachers in educating the
children of this community;
NOW, THEREORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the St. Louis Park City Council
proclaims May 2-6, 2016 to be TEACHER APPRECIATION WEEK; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the St. Louis Park City Council strongly
encourage all members of our community to join with in personally expressing appreciation
to our teachers for their dedication and devotion to their work.
WHEREFORE, I set my hand and cause the
Great Seal of the City of St. Louis Park to be
affixed this 2nd day of May, 2016.
______________________________________
Jake Spano, Mayor
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: May 2, 2016
Minutes: 3a
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
MARCH 28, 2016
The meeting convened at 6:30 p.m.
Councilmembers present: Mayor Jake Spano, Tim Brausen, Gregg Lindberg, Thom Miller, and
Susan Sanger.
Councilmembers absent: Anne Mavity and Steve Hallfin.
Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), Police Chief (Mr. Luse), City Assessor (Mr.
Bultema), Commercial Appraiser (Ms. Nathanson), Engineering Director (Ms. Heiser), Deputy
Police Chief (Mr. DiLorenzo), Police Lieutenant (Mr. Kraayenbrink), Police Lieutenant (Mr.
Harcey), and Recording Secretary (Ms. Pappas).
Guest: City Attorney (Mr. Knetsch)
1. Future Study Session Agenda Planning – April 4, 11, & 18, 2016
Mr. Harmening presented the proposed Study Session agenda for April 4, 11, & 18, 2016.
The agendas will include the following:
April 18 - Environment and Sustainability Commission, along with the iMatters group, will
present a Climate Action Plan.
April 25 – Reconvene of the Board of Appeals and Equalization
Mayor Spano requested hosting Study Sessions in other facilities around the City, and Mr.
Harmening will look for opportunities to do this beginning in May.
Mr. Harmening asked if the Walker Lake area and Community Center Expansion should be added
to an upcoming Study Session also.
Councilmember Brausen added he would like to discuss the “bring your own bag” ordinance at a
future Study Session. He stated that the Council should ask the Environment and Sustainability
Commission to send a written opinion on the ordinance and if it promotes a healthier, cleaner
environment.
Councilmember Lindberg asked how much staff time and effort it will take to educate the public
on the Zero Waste Ordinance and to get it up and running. Additionally, what is the cost in time
and energy resources that need to go into this effort? He noted he needs more information in order
to make a decision.
Mr. Harmening stated he will send the draft ordinance to the Council so they can review it again.
He added that 150 St. Louis Park businesses will be impacted by a Zero Waste Ordinance. He
noted that an ordinance regulating plastic and paper bags would have a much wider impact on
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 3a) Page 2
Title: Study Session Minutes of March 28, 2016
businesses. He added there is concern about doing a good job of communicating and implementing
this type of ordinance while staff is in the process of implementing the Zero Waste Ordinance.
Councilmember Sanger added staff needs to take time to find out what implementation of this
ordinance would look like.
Mr. Harmening added that he will ask the Environmental and Sustainability Commission for their
views and recommendations on the latest draft of the ordinance
Mayor Spano also noted the addition of a working meeting with the School Board.
Councilmember Brausen asked the councilmembers if anyone was interested in serving on the
CEAC as he is unable to attend these meetings, and it is required that two Councilmembers serve.
Currently, he and Councilmember Lindberg attend the meetings.
2. 2016 Market Value Overview
Mr. Bultema presented the report regarding the 2016 Market Value Overview. He explained the
Minnesota property tax process with emphasis on the timing of the market, when assessed values
are set, and when budgets and taxes are levied. He stated that the City Assessor maintains records
on all city parcels with inspections on a five year schedule. He noted interim inspections and
review of permits also occur. The initial assessment is a mass appraisal with computer-assisted
modeling. As sales occur, they are tracked in order to provide a ratio. Values are then retargeted
to bring the assessed values into balance with the market. The city’s values are typically very close
to the sale price for about 90% of homes. Condos and townhomes present a different market
performance and can be more volatile in their assessments. Industrial and apartments are more
complicated with more emphasis on income as well as sales. Staff verifies these sales personally
with buyers and sellers. The staff works on relationships with commercial buyers.
Mr. Bultema added that the process is reset every January 2 for Minnesota property taxes, and the
appeals process begins. For the Board of Appeal, the meeting date has been set and at least one
trained member must be in attendance at each Board meeting. The County Board appeals process
begins in May; and tax court, the last appeal option, has a deadline of the following April.
Mr. Bultema discussed the current real estate market, noting it is fairly stable at this time with
single-family homes. Commercial and industrial are still growing fast in St. Louis Park, and
apartment values continue to be aggressive. He added that some sales clearly indicate that the
market is near the top of the value cycle.
He noted that from a historical perspective, the market is late in the cycle, and return on
investments in Class C rentals is pushing the envelope. Mr. Bultema explained that Class C refers
to properties which are 30-50 years and older. Class B is properties in the 10-15 year-old range,
and Class A is new properties. He noted that the majority of new construction assumes that rents
will continue to go up every year, and Class C stock is selling at values not seen before for this
type of product.
Mayor Spano asked that given many of the properties are over 50 years old and half are apartments,
if there is anything that should be done at this time. Mr. Bultema stated St. Louis Park is
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 3a) Page 3
Title: Study Session Minutes of March 28, 2016
performing very well in this area, especially related to rental licenses, code inspections and crime-
free training for landlords.
Councilmember Miller asked if investors are purchasing properties and then renovating them to
make them Class A properties. Mr. Bultema said no. If an apartment building is Class C, it remains
that. Subsequently, there are many being demolished and new builds are going up.
Mr. Bultema presented various maps of the City showing median sales, where values have
increased, and where more renovations are occurring. Values continue to be higher on the City’s
east side, nearer to the Minneapolis lakes area. However, all in all, St. Louis Park homes are a
good value and hold their value, while residents continue to move into the City for location and
schools.
Mr. Bultema noted that the Housing Improvement Areas, where the City has acted as the lender
of last resort for associations, have mitigated market trends, and these areas are recovering nicely
through this program.
Mr. Bultema reviewed the commercial, industrial and apartment sales in the City, stating that last
year in St. Louis Park there were more of these types of sales than any other suburb in Hennepin
County. The West End/394 Corridor is in high demand and at premium value, with significant
redevelopment activity.
Councilmember Sanger said it would be helpful to have a Study Session on the long-term
implications of ongoing redevelopment efforts in the city.
3. Body Worn Cameras for Police Officers
Police Chief Luse presented the staff report regarding body worn cameras for Police Officers.
Chief Luse noted the Police Department has been discussing the body camera concept over the
past year and looked into two vendors. The trial period has gone well and favorable comments
have been collected from officers. The concept of body worn cameras helps with transparency
and evidence collection, while comments from the public have been generally positive. Some
questions typically are asked by the public about the cameras, but most have been friendly, with
only minor inhibitions.
Chief Luse indicated vendors prefer that the Police Department partner with them on storage, but
that combined with costs over time are a concern. Costs currently run in the $52,000 - $63,500
range for cameras and storage. Another option is for the Police Department to do their own backup
and storage; however, this takes many hours of data review by officers and at least two additional
hours per shift per officer. Additionally, if the public would like to review data, that involves
many hours of pulling data by officers. Chief Luse stated that so far there have not been many
public data requests.
Chief Luse referred to the Burnsville and Duluth Police Departments, which are pioneers in this
project, and noted that much can be learned from them.
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 3a) Page 4
Title: Study Session Minutes of March 28, 2016
City Attorney Elliot Knetsch noted when the public requests data, the police are given 7–10 days
to respond. Chief Luse added that there is no charge for staff time, but there is a charge for the
media used to provide the data, such as the use of a DVD or jump drive.
Chief Luse also pointed out that there have been discussions about police cameras that are used in
evidence collection as it pertains to domestic violence cases. The debate involved relates to the
notion of when the video actually becomes public information and also which jurisdiction has
authority over this evidence.
Chief Luse added that the Police Department would like to spend time on writing policy and setting
up training programs so this will be done correctly. He added they would like to discuss this with
the St. Louis Park schools also, and review the program before it is put into place.
Councilmember Sanger noted the costs, timing, and transparency, but asked if having the video
has made any difference in the outcomes of cases. Chief Luse stated when the camera is on, they
have seen behavior modification, but beyond that, he does not have an answer to this question. He
added there was only one inquiry for data during the timeframe that the Police Department was
piloting the body cameras. He also noted that there were no differences in outcomes of any cases
during the time the body cameras were piloted.
Mr. Knetsch stated that we have not always had body cameras; however, people are still convicted
of crimes. Additionally, Exhibit A in a case is typically the testimony of a crime victim or police
officer.
Councilmember Lindberg noted that policy will need to be woven into the conversation on body
cameras and will determine if the City goes forward on this.
Mr. Harmening asked Chief Luse what his recommendation is on this issue. Chief Luse stated it
is just a matter of time before they will be in use, but right now in St. Louis Park it may be too
early to use body cameras. There are still many legal and legislative issues to address and policy
to be written before the City moves ahead with this.
The councilmembers agreed that body cameras would provide additional evidence in domestic
violence cases. Mr. Knetsch added that a person can be prosecuted in a domestic violence case
even if the person who initially brought charges drops them later, and body cameras can aid in this
situation.
Mayor Spano stated he believes schools and domestic violence advocacy groups are interested in
the use of body cameras. He added the Council should hear from these groups prior to making a
decision to move forward. He also stated he would be interested in conviction rates in Burnsville
and how body cameras have worked for them.
The councilmembers added they would like to get ahead of this process and be intentional when
talking about body cameras in St. Louis Park. They agreed they would also like a clear statement
of what role body cameras play and what they would solve if used.
Chief Luse added the police would like to take their time, take measured steps, and write policy
before the program is finally implemented.
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 3a) Page 5
Title: Study Session Minutes of March 28, 2016
Mr. Harmening stated he would like staff to do more research, and monitor the State Legislature
and experiences of other communities, while also having discussions with stakeholders, schools,
and advocacy groups. He asked staff for another update on this topic before end of 2016.
4. Connect the Park! CIP Update
Ms. Heiser and Mr. Sullivan presented the staff report regarding Connect the Park! CIP Update.
This is a community-wide effort involving the addition of sidewalks, trails, and bikeways. It was
included in the Comprehensive Plan in 2013, involves no assessment to residents, and was part of
the city’s 10-year plan. It involves 10 miles of sidewalks, 3 miles of trails, and 32 miles of
bikeways.
They noted that projects slated for this summer will be communicated to residents and meetings
conducted in advance.
Mr. Harmening stated that projects reviewed this evening are for 2017, and if councilmembers
agree to proceed now, the projects will move forward. If approved, staff will begin contacting
residents immediately.
Mr. Sullivan pointed out sidewalk updates and gap segments for Xenwood, Wooddale, and Utica
Avenues.
Councilmember Sanger asked for a list of the blocks affected.
Mr. Harmening explained the history of this project as part of community visioning first identified
in 1995. It was revisited in 2005-06, and then the Connect the Park! plan emerged in 2013.
Councilmember Sanger stated she agrees with taking next steps but cautioned that some residents
might push back on some of the projects, while others may ask what took so long. She added if
Webster Park is redeveloped afterwards, it would be helpful to have safe ways for people to get to
the park.
Councilmember Lindberg stated Connect the Park! is about greater good; getting out to the
affected neighborhoods as soon as possible; and having broad conversations on particular projects,
especially in relation to these gaps. He added this process will also bring out residents who are
unhappy but will be part of navigating through this process.
Councilmember Sanger noted a technique she has used with constituents in the past is to have them
approach her if they are not inclined to speak up on an issue. She then counts the names but keeps
them anonymous, pointing out this is an acceptable manner in which to gather feedback.
Councilmember Brausen added the schools are in favor of this project, but groups need to be
invited in for broader discussion so projects can be prioritized.
Mayor Spano added he is worried about only hearing from people that support the project, adding
that it is up to the Council to change that perception and make the meeting environment open to
all residents, whether they support or disapprove of a project.
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 3a) Page 6
Title: Study Session Minutes of March 28, 2016
Councilmember Lindberg added that they want to connect the City and don’t want to lose sight
that this is a community effort, for the common good and for schools, parks, and neighborhoods.
Councilmember Sanger questioned a sidewalk south of 28th Street, which is a dead-end street. She
noted there is no point adding a sidewalk there or spending money on this. Ms. Heiser explained
it is viewed as a system improvement.
Mr. Harmening added that the Utica to Vernon sidewalk should be proposed; however, not a
sidewalk south of 27th Street.
Mayor Spano added that this can be discussed with the neighbors living in that area.
Mr. Sullivan noted this area is only a portion to complete the entire gap. He stated they will remove
the sidewalk on Utica, south of 28th. He stated the Browndale sidewalks are proposed for 2022.
Councilmember Brausen asked about the Louisiana Avenue project north of Cedar Lake Road.
Ms. Heiser stated staff is working on a scope for this area. She added it will need bike lanes,
sidewalks, and possibly easements. Mr. Sullivan added that the area north of Japs Olson, involving
the Minnehaha Creek Trail and the Watershed District, is also looking for funding sources in order
to complete trails in that area.
Mr. Harmening added that the tie-in with light rail also makes sense. Additionally, 2016 bikeways
and share-the-road facilities are scheduled for spring implementation. France Avenue will be
striped for bikeways and a pedestrian solar flasher will be added.
Councilmember Sanger also asked about the following areas:
- Many residents in the Lake Forest neighborhood did not want sidewalks; however, the area
and sightlines need to be addressed, as folks will not walk in this area.
- Can a segment of trail be developed that connects the two Cedarwood areas, along with a
boardwalk that would be on mesh instead of wood? She added that trees would need to be
removed, but noted this is public land.
Ms. Heiser and Mr. Sullivan stated they would look into these two items; however, staff is working
on multiple projects related to the 10-year CIP. Mr. Harmening added that timing is an issue and
projects are currently set for 2017, so staff will need to manage expectations.
Councilmember Sanger asked for conceptual to be done, with input from neighbors.
Ms. Heiser noted that conceptual work takes time. Mr. Harmening added staff doesn’t want to
overpromise and underperform but they will look at the CIP to see when they could get to this
project.
Councilmember Brausen asked about the area of Cedar Lake Road to 28th Street. Mr. Sullivan
noted this will be part of the 2017-18 project.
5. Debrief on Boards and Commissions Annual Meeting
Mr. Harmening presented the report on the Boards and Commissions Annual Meeting. He noted
that information was provided in the staff report and asked the Council if they want to meet with
any of the commissions for more in-depth conversations.
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 3a) Page 7
Title: Study Session Minutes of March 28, 2016
Mayor Spano stated he did not see an immediate need for in-depth conversations.
Councilmember Lindberg said he would like more conversations with the Human Rights
Commission regarding race and equity but no more presentations.
Councilmember Brausen noted the suggestion by the Environment and Sustainability Commission
to have a councilmember as part of their group or attend their meetings once per quarter. He added
they would like more interaction with the Council, and he views this merely as an exchange of
information.
Councilmember Sanger stated she is not in favor of councilmembers attending commission
meetings, pointing out that having a councilmember at their meeting is intimidating to the
commissioners. She did agree with having a staff liaison who could be available to answer
questions for the commissions.
Mayor Spano pointed out it is not good for the Council to manage the commissions, stating that
the Council only wants their recommendations.
Councilmember Sanger stated this request is being driven by the Environment and Sustainability
Commission, which feels they do not have enough face time with the Council. She added she does
not want to start this process.
Mayor Spano added this is the role of staff members, and it is Mr. Harmening’s job to work with
the commissions. He added that the commissions exist to advise the Council, and councilmembers
need to tell the commissions what they need to do for them.
Councilmember Miller agreed and added it would be helpful to direct the Police Advisory
Commission to work with Police Department on the body camera issues. They would provide the
community voice.
Councilmember Brausen added we need a clear system to give assignments to the commissions
and have them review policy.
Mayor Spano asked if the Boards and Commissions are under-utilized and if the Council is making
the best use of them.
Councilmember Lindberg added the city’s professional staff is the best resource for
commissioners, and they need to be utilized.
Communications/Meeting Check-In (Verbal)
Mr. Harmening noted the Highway 7 bridge removal is slated for April 16 and 23. He also noted
Highway 100 will be closed both weekends.
Mr. Harmening stated the Rotary Club is donating $1,400 next Monday, during a presentation.
These funds are from the Winter Fun Day at Oak Park and are open ended.
The meeting adjourned at 9:55 p.m.
Written Reports provided and documented for recording purposes only:
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 3a) Page 8
Title: Study Session Minutes of March 28, 2016
6. February 2016 Monthly Financial Report
7. Assessment Policy Discussion (continued) – Administrative Items
8. Zero Waste Packaging Update
9. Health in the Park Update
10. Update on MoneyGram’s Minnesota Investment Fund Award from DEED
11. Proposed Cooperative Agreement with MCWD and Park Nicollet8
______________________________________ ______________________________________
Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Jake Spano, Mayor
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: May 2, 2016
Minutes: 3b
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL STUDY SESSION
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
APRIL 4, 2016
The meeting convened at 6:30 p.m.
Councilmembers present: Mayor Jake Spano. Gregg Lindberg, Tim Brausen, Steve Hallfin, Anne
Mavity, Thom Miller, and Susan Sanger.
Councilmembers absent: None.
Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), Senior Engineering Project Manager (Mr. Elkin),
Engineering Director (Ms. Heiser), Communications Specialist (Ms. Pribbenow), and Recording
Secretary (Ms. Batra).
Guest: Mr. Charles Hathaway (Senior Water Resources Engineer, Barr Engineering)
1. Update on Bass Lake Preserve Improvements
Mr. Elkin presented the update on the Bass Lake Preserve improvements. The Department of
Natural Resources (DNR), the Watershed District, the Board of Soil and Water Resources, and the
Army Corps of Engineers were contacted to get a framework for what type of permits will be
involved to achieve the goals of the area. Staff reviewed City Council reports and minutes from
previous study sessions to get a sense of what was needed for the project and the possibilities.
After meeting with regulators, the plan was formulated.
Mr. Elkin discussed the three proposed areas for the Bass Lake Preserve improvements, which
include infrastructure improvements, dredging, and upland vegetation management. A tree
inventory was conducted; the wetlands were evaluated; and a master plan for vegetation
management was created for the removal of diseased and evasive species of trees.
Mr. Elkin explained that before upland dredging could be addressed, a plan had to be created for
the sediment. A number of samples were collected and tested. These tests found that the middle of
the lake did not show signs of sediment. Rather, the middle of the lake only showed decomposition
of the natural vegetation and cattails.
Mr. Elkin stated the next focus moved to vegetation management. According to the DNR, up to
40% of the preserve’s vegetation could be removed for maintenance. However, concrete reasons
that would prohibit function must exist in order to remove the vegetation. Also, if the removal is
not done on a permanent basis, the vegetation will grow back. Removing vegetation for open water
is not advised at this time.
Mr. Elkin discussed Carpenter Park and what the proposed plan is for that area. The subsurface
basin would raise the elevation of the park, which would in turn capture more storm water to be
used on the parks and ballfields. Additionally, credits are built up for treating this area. These
credits can be used for redevelopment projects such as the light rail. Mr. Harmening added that
this facility would reduce the phosphorus load by approximately 20 pounds, which is notable.
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 3b) Page 2
Title: Special Study Session Minutes of April 4, 2016
Councilmember Miller asked for more information on dredging. Mr. Elkin replied that the DNR
must approve dredging, and dredging is only approved in specific conditions. Mr. Hathaway stated
that the primary issue with dredging is that dredging changes the characteristics of the wetland.
The DNR is not favorable to that outcome, because changing the characteristics is not the right
way to manage wetlands. In addition, Mr. Hathaway explained that the wetland that is removed
would have to be created somewhere else. Mr. Elkin stated that the DNR requests a plan that must
meet specific outlined conditions in order to approve dredging.
Ms. Heiser explained that the DNR has a checklist of items that must be met in order to permit
dredging. Staff has reviewed this list extensively to look for the required criteria; however, this
history was not found. Mayor Spano asked, assuming that all the criteria were found, where the
replacement wetlands would have to be created. Mr. Hathaway responded that wetlands would be
required to be recreated locally; however, since that most likely would not be possible, credits
could be purchased to use somewhere else.
Councilmember Mavity challenged the designation of wetlands versus a lake. Mr. Hathaway
explained that the Bass Lake preserve is currently classified as a wetland. Councilmember Mavity
asked whether reclassification is a public process, and Mr. Hathaway responded that he did not
know. Councilmember Mavity explained that the preserve has been a lake for 140 years. Mr. Elkin
stated that the physical characteristics of the preserve have now changed. Mr. Elkin further
explained that there was not a tipping point. Mr. Hathaway stated that the designation doesn’t
really matter because the history is still the same. Councilmember Mavity pointed out that the
designation does govern what can be done to the area in terms of improvements.
Councilmember Sanger explained that the information presented by staff is different than the
information presented by Friends of Bass Lake. She asked if consideration had been given to gather
all information, present this information to the DNR, and allow them to make a decision on how
to proceed. Mr. Elkin explained that as part of this process, more research was conducted.
Conflicting information about the elevation of the outlet was found. The elevation was set in 1907
and staff is trying to figure out what the elevation was prior to that year. In addition, every City
has their own date in reference to taking surveys. In 1920, there were changes and more evidence
can be found to support that.
Mr. Elkin discussed the information from Friends of Bass Lake and explained the similarities in
the information that staff presented. The water level now only means that the water level has less
ability to increase to the levels it used to be. However, the situation hasn’t changed that much.
Mr. Elkin presented a map to show the area that is being discussed. Ms. Heiser explained that the
pipes that empty into the wetland are below water. With the existing pipe network, the
infrastructure system was based on water equalizing due to elevation. Councilmember Sanger
confirmed that dredging wouldn’t help the situation. Mr. Elkin explained that if the water level
was raised, the pipes would have less volume and capacity when it rains than when it was lower.
Mr. Hathaway stated that if the water was raised in Bass Lake, the pipes would overflow faster.
Councilmember Brausen stated a marsh and a wetland are being discussed. This area did not occur
overnight; it has been here hundreds of years. He added that dredging the wetland for aesthetic
purposes is ridiculous.
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 3b) Page 3
Title: Special Study Session Minutes of April 4, 2016
Councilmember Mavity stated that sediment has built up in the lake and has increased over the
years as this area has been overused. She asked about the northeast corner that Friends of Bass
Lake is concerned about. Ms. Heiser stated that one of the goals of this project is to improve water
quality as stated in the Beltline Report. Councilmember Mavity asked if Bass Lake itself was part
of the filtering system and Ms. Heiser responded yes. Councilmember Mavity asked where the
balance is and how the plan was constructed. Mr. Elkin explained that the proposed plan was
designed to achieve water quality. He further stated that during the summer, there is significant
phosphorus change. However, in the fall, this foliage becomes part of the fertilizer.
In response to Councilmember Mavity’s request for what’s expected of the Council, Ms. Heiser
explained that the Carpenter Park proposal is ripe for a Council decision due to the credits the City
would earn to apply to another project, the reduction in phosphorus, and the expansion of useable
space. Staff proposes that the City move forward on this plan due to all of the benefits.
Councilmember Hallfin stated that the whole City is built on a marsh. He inquired as to when the
body of water was named Bass Lake, and he asked about the history of the area as that could
possibly answer some of Councilmember Mavity’s questions.
Councilmember Lindberg stated that it makes no sense to open up the lake for the purpose of
aesthetics. He requested that the Council review this issue from an environmental prospective. The
urban reality of storm water management is Bass Lake. In reference to the northeast corner, he
stated that improving the quality of vegetation and upland vegetation management makes the most
sense as that approach will have inherent environmental benefits. Reducing phosphorus just makes
sense.
Mayor Spano explained that his concern, as was previously, is the City attempting to make the
area into something that it’s not designed to be. Mayor Spano stated, in the interest of the broader
aquatic environment, the suggestions brought to the Council are the right thing to do for the
environment.
In reference to vegetation management, Councilmember Mavity stated that this idea is not just for
aesthetics. If nothing is done, street sediments are going to eventually fill the lake. Mr. Hathaway
agreed with Councilmember Mavity’s statement for the west end of the lake. However, Ms. Heiser
explained that sediment was not found in the center of the lake. Maintenance dredging would be
permitted at the west end of the lake due to the samples found.
The Council decided to continue the discussion at a future study session before any action is taken.
Communications/Meeting Check-In (Verbal)
None.
The meeting adjourned at 7:22 p.m.
______________________________________ ______________________________________
Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Jake Spano, Mayor
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: May 2, 2016
Minutes: 3c
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
APRIL 4, 2016
1. Call to Order
Mayor Spano called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
Councilmembers present: Mayor Jake Spano, Tim Brausen, Steve Hallfin, Gregg Lindberg, Anne
Mavity, Thom Miller, and Susan Sanger.
Councilmembers absent: None.
Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), City Attorney (Ms. McDowell Poehler), Deputy
City Manager/Human Resources Director (Ms. Deno), Recreation Supervisor (Ms. Abernathy),
Solid Waste Program Coordinator (Ms. Fisher), Engineering Director (Ms. Heiser),
Planning/Zoning Supervisor (Ms. McMonigal), HKGi Planning Consultant (Mr. Miller), Project
Engineer (Mr. Wiesen), Communications Specialist (Ms. Pribbenow), and Recording Secretary
(Ms. Batra).
Guests: Greg Palmer (President, St. Louis Park Rotary Club) and Peter Hilger (New Horizons
Architect).
1a. Pledge of Allegiance
1b. Roll Call
2. Presentations
2a. 2nd Annual SLP Earth Day Proclamation
Mayor Spano introduced and read the proclamation. He explained that this is St. Louis
Parks’ second annual Earth Day celebration and the event will take place at the Lenox
Community Center on April 24, 2016. He thanked SLP SEEDS and the Environment and
Sustainability Commission for hosting the celebration.
2b. Presentation Accepting Monetary Donation from Rotary Club of St. Louis
Park for the Summer Concert Series ($1,300)
Lisa Abernathy, Recreation Supervisor, was in attendance to accept a donation of $1,300
for the summer concert series from the St. Louis Park Rotary Club. Greg Palmer, president
of the Rotary Club, explained that the club was chartered in 1947 to make the world a better
place. In January, the SLP Rotary Club, along with the Operations and Recreation
Department, hosted Bundled Up Winter Fun Day. Through this event, additional funds
were raised to help with the concert series. Mayor Spano expressed his appreciation for all
of the help the Rotary Club provides to the City.
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 3c) Page 2
Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of April 4, 2016
2c. Recognition of Donations
Mayor Spano thanked the Minnesota Society of Arboriculture for their $2,500 donation for
Mr. Vaughan, Environmental Coordinator, to attend the 2016 International Society of
Arboriculture Conference in Fort Worth, Texas.
2d. Proclamation – National Service Recognition Day
Mayor Spano recognized AmeriCorps, SeniorCorps, and other national service programs
for all of the services they provide to the City. Mayor Spano proclaimed that April 5, 2016,
is National Service Recognition Day in St. Louis Park.
3. Approval of Minutes
3a. Special City Council Meeting Minutes February 29, 2016
Councilmember Miller requested on page 3 a change to his statement. It should state that
he was in favor of the project and that the facility was a perfect private project.
It was moved by Councilmember Brausen and seconded by Councilmember Lindberg to
approve the February 29, 2016 Special City Council Meeting Minutes with changes.
The motion passed 7-0.
3b. Joint City Council/School Board Meeting Minutes March 14, 2016
The minutes were approved as presented.
It was moved by Councilmember Hallfin and seconded by Councilmember Mavity to
approve the March 14, 2016 Joint City Council/School Board Meeting Minutes as
presented.
The motion passed 7-0.
4. Approval of Agenda and Items on Consent Calendar
NOTE: The Consent Calendar lists those items of business which are considered to be routine
and/or which need no discussion. Consent items are acted upon by one motion. If discussion is
desired by either a Councilmember or a member of the audience, that item may be moved to an
appropriate section of the regular agenda for discussion.
4a. Approve the Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance No. 16-2488 creating Section 36-
268-PUD 4 of the Zoning Code and amending the Zoning Map from the O-Office to
PUD 4 for the property located at 5075 Wayzata Boulevard, and approve the summary
ordinance for publication.
4b. Approve Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance No. 16-2489 creating Section 36-268-
PUD 5 of the Zoning Code and amending the Zoning Map from R-3 Two Family
Residence to Planned Unit Development (PUD) 5 for property on the 7700 block of
Wayzata Boulevard, and approve the Summary Ordinance for publication.
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 3c) Page 3
Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of April 4, 2016
4c. Adopt Resolution No. 16-050 ratifying the EDA’s application to Department of
Employment and Economic Development (DEED) for Minnesota Investment Funds
(MIF) on behalf of MoneyGram.
4d. Adopt Resolution No. 16-051 approving acceptance of a monetary donation from the
Minnesota Society of Arboriculture in an amount not to exceed $2,500 for all related
expenses for Jim Vaughan, Natural Resources Coordinator, to attend the 2016
International Society of Arboriculture Conference in Fort Worth, Texas.
4e. Adopt Resolution No. 16-052 approving acceptance of a monetary donation from the
Rotary Club of St. Louis Park in the amount of $1,300 for the Recreation Division’s
Summer Concert Series.
4f. Adopt Resolution No. 16-053 approving a Master Partnership Contract with MnDOT
relating to Laboratory Testing Services.
4g. Approve for filing Planning Commission Minutes of February 17, 2016.
4h. Approve for filing Planning Commission Minutes of March 2, 2016.
4i. Approve for filing Board of Zoning Appeals Minutes of July 23, 2015.
4j. Approve for filing Environment & Sustainability Commission: Sustainable SLP Minutes
of February 3, 2016.
4k. Accept for filing City Disbursement Claims for the period of January 23 through March
25, 2016.
It was moved by Councilmember Brausen, seconded by Councilmember Sanger, to approve
the Agenda as presented on the Consent Calendar; and to waive reading of all resolutions
and ordinances.
The motion passed 7-0.
5. Boards and Commissions - None
6. Public Hearings - None
7. Requests, Petitions, and Communications from the Public – None
8. Resolutions, Ordinances, Motions and Discussion Items
8a. Bid Tabulation: 2016 Pavement Management and Connect the Park! Project
(4016-1000 & 4016-2000). Resolution No. 16-054
Mr. Wiesen presented the staff report regarding the 2016 Pavement Management and
Connect the Park! Program. He discussed the recommended actions.
Mr. Wiesen explained that the City opened bids for the project on March 24, 2016. Park
Construction Company submitted the lowest bid. He discussed the funding sources and the
amounts dedicated to the proposed project. The public hearing was held on Feb. 29, 2016,
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 3c) Page 4
Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of April 4, 2016
in which residents discussed the plan. Mr. Wiesen discussed the actions taken by staff as a
result of the feedback received at the public hearing.
In reference to the no parking restriction on 34th Street, Mr. Wiesen discussed the design
constraints around the bridge. He displayed a visual aid on what the area would look like,
and discussed why the street must be narrowed.
Mr. Harmening stated that one thing the residents expressed concern about is why new
sidewalks were being added when others are in disrepair. Another issue brought up by the
residents is drainage issues in Aquila Park. He explained that Area 5 is now being focused
on, and the sidewalks are being evaluated without any adding new costs to the project. In
addition, a resolution regarding a low point over the trail in Aquila Park is in the works.
Councilmember Sanger discussed a communication she received from a resident stating
that narrowing the street would make it less safe for pedestrians. From previous
discussions, she learned that narrowing a roadway tends to make drivers slow down so it
is actually safer. Councilmember Sanger asked staff to confirm that.
Mr. Wiesen stated that narrowing a street does tend to calm traffic and improve safety.
Mr. Sullivan added that the sidewalk connection is being made from the east and west
because sidewalks that end negate safety for pedestrians.
Councilmember Lindberg stated that the bids are much lower than anticipated. He added
that the proposed sidewalk connection made sense.
Marcia Oleisky, 8905 34th St. W., stated that she commends Councilmember Lindberg for
his work on this issue. She explained that she understands the project; however, she hopes
that this issue has been well discussed.
Mayor Spano stated that narrowing the street does produce a calming effect on traffic.
Councilmember Lindberg noted staff is looking at options to study either signage or paint
on the street to address traffic control.
It was moved by Councilmember Lindberg, seconded by Councilmember Miller, to
designate Park Construction Company as the lowest responsible bidder and authorize
execution of a contract with the firm in the amount of $2,743,053.02 for the 2016 Pavement
Management and Connect the Park! Project No. 4016-1000; and adopt Resolution No.
16-054 authorizing the installation of “No Parking” restrictions on the north side of 34th
Street from Decatur Lane to 415 feet east of Decatur Lane.
The motion passed 7-0.
8b. Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, and Variance – New Horizons
Academy, 2460 Hwy 100. Resolution No. 16-055 and No. 16-056
Mr. Miller presented the staff report regarding the New Horizon Daycare facility. He
discussed the proposed resolutions recommended by staff and outlined the staff report.
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 3c) Page 5
Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of April 4, 2016
Mr. Miller explained that the site is to the right of Westside Volkswagen. The building is
a single story structure, approximately 10,000 square feet in size, with off-street parking
beside and behind the building. He discussed the Comprehensive Land Use Map and the
zoning map for the area in question, which defined the different zones in the surrounding
areas. He reviewed the plan for the outdoor play area and the 200-foot setback due to the
easement that has limited space.
New Horizon’s proposed site plan includes a play area on both the south and north sides
of the building. Mr. Miller explained the reasons for the requested variance that would
allow this play area to be built. He displayed a photo that showed the existing safety barrier
and the building to the left. The existing barrier and the higher elevation of the highway
are good for the daycare center. New Horizons has agreed to provide a trail that would
provide access to the regional trail to the north.
At the public hearing on March 2, 2016, two residents expressed concern with the traffic
on Utica Avenue. The Planning Commission discussed the proposed amount of outdoor
play area space versus the number of kids that can be licensed for this daycare facility. The
Planning Commission recommended approval. In addition, staff is recommending
approval of the three motions.
Councilmember Sanger asked staff about the trail and whether there was sufficient space
for the trail along Utica Avenue so it would not be isolated. Ms. McMonigal stated that
there is sufficient room.
Peter Hilger, New Horizons architect, introduced himself and stated that this is the center’s
third attempt to have a daycare center in the cit y.
In reference to the number of children at the daycare, Councilmember Sanger asked where
that number came from. Mr. Hilger explained that the number of children is mandated by
state licensing guidelines. Councilmember Sanger noted that the daycare is closed evenings
and weekends. She expressed the concern of residents regarding traffic and asked staff to
look at what the traffic may look like if the business was something other than a daycare
facility. She explained that staff found that the traffic from a different business at this site
would be the same, possibly even more.
Councilmember Brausen asked for affirmation that an existing building would be reused,
and Mr. Hilger confirmed that is the case. Councilmember Brausen asked about screening
the children from the highway. Mr. Hilger explained screening is in the proposed plans.
Councilmember Miller stated that he thinks this facility would be an excellent addition for
this neighborhood. He asked about New Horizon’s cost for daycare. Mr. Hilger responded
that New Horizons is rated one of the highest in quality for daycare centers in the metro
area.
Councilmember Mavity stated that when looking at Connect the Park! trails, the
connections for this area are scheduled for 2018.
Councilmember Sanger asked when the center would plan to open. Mr. Hilger responded
the goal is for the center to be open for fall enrollment.
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 3c) Page 6
Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of April 4, 2016
It was moved by Councilmember Sanger, seconded by Councilmember Mavity, to adopt
Resolution No. 16-055, for a Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Amendment and
authorize summary publication; to approve the First Reading of the Ordinance amending
the Zoning Map to rezone the subject property from Office to Neighborhood Commercial,
and set a second reading for April 18, 2016; and to adopt Resolution No. 16-056
approving a variance to allow the outdoor play area to be less than 200 feet from a
principal arterial, subject to conditions recommended by staff.
The motion passed 7-0.
8c. Zero Waste Packaging – Acceptable & Exempt Materials.
Ms. Fisher, Solid Waste Coordinator, presented the staff report regarding the acceptable
and exempt materials list for the Zero Waste Packaging Ordinance.
Ms. Fisher discussed the history, intent, and requirements of the Zero Waste Packaging
Ordinance. To allow the acceptable and exempt materials list to be flexible, the Council
will review the list annually to add/delete materials.
Ms. Fisher stated that acceptable recycling materials must be accepted locally and marketed
to existing robust recycling markets. The list that was put together as acceptable includes
select plastics and metal packaging materials. Ms. Fisher displayed images of both
acceptable recyclable and unacceptable materials.
In reference to acceptable compostable materials, Ms. Fisher noted the types of packaging
that are compliant with the ordinance must be accepted by local commercial composting
facilities. The list of acceptable compostable materials includes unlined paper products,
wax paper, and certified compostable products. She further explained that the polyethylene
(plastic) coating on paper packaging is a contaminant which ends up in the finished
compost and there is no way to remove it.
Ms. Fisher explained that packaging exemptions are made only where there is no
commercially available alternative product. The ordinance does not require staff to take
cost into consideration when considering exemption.
Staff proposes a one-year exemption for paper food wrappers. Currently, this paper has a
coating so that grease does not soak through. There is no alternative on the market at this
time.
Mayor Spano asked for clarification regarding the coating on packaging materials such as
coffee cups and whether there is an easy tip to identify compostable versus non-
compostable. Ms. Fisher explained that coffee cups typically have a non-compostable
plastic lining.
Councilmember Brausen stated that he is really excited and is proud that the City is taking
the lead on this issue. He explained that the City wants to work with the residents to
accomplish this goal.
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 3c) Page 7
Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of April 4, 2016
Mayor Spano stated that he has learned a lot through this process, and he is excited because
it increases the city’s organic collection.
It was moved by Councilmember Sanger, seconded by Councilmember Brausen, to approve
the acceptable recyclable and compostable material lists and exempt products as noted in
the staff report.
The motion passed 7-0.
8d. Resolution Approving Annual City Manager Evaluation. Resolution No.
16-057
Ms. Deno presented the staff report regarding the proposal to approve the annual City
Manager evaluation. To finalize this process, staff is asking the Mayor to read the proposed
resolution for approval.
Mayor Spano stated that Mr. Harmening has been leading the City for many years. He
pushes the Council in a proactive way to be successful and manages the City with grace.
When talking with City staff, his influence is invaluable.
Mayor Spano recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 16-057 approving
formal acceptance of the final City Manager annual evaluation.
The motion passed 7-0.
9. Communications
Ms. Deno stated that on May 11th, Tim Simon will be starting as the City’s new Controller.
10. Adjournment
The meeting adjourned at 8:31 p.m.
______________________________________ ______________________________________
Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Jake Spano, Mayor
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: May 2, 2016
Consent Agenda Item: 4a
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Approval of City Disbursements
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to accept for filing City Disbursement Claims for the
period of March 26 through April 22, 2016.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council desire to approve City disbursements in
accordance with Section 6.11 – Disbursements – How Made, of the City’s Charter?
SUMMARY: The Accounting Division prepares this report on a monthly basis for the City
Council to review and approve. The attached reports show both City disbursements paid by
physical check and those by wire transfer or Automated Clearing House (ACH) when applicable.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Review and approval of the information
follows the City’s Charter and provides another layer of oversight to further ensure fiscal
stewardship.
VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: City Disbursements
Prepared by: Connie Neubeck, Account Clerk
Reviewed by: Steven Heintz, Interim Controller
4/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:11:24R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
1Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
4/22/20163/26/2016 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
117.66ABELSON, SHARON HOUSING REHAB BALANCE SHEET CONTRACTS PAYABLE
117.66
473.64ABLE HOSE & RUBBER INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
473.64
1,103.70ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY INC GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
1,103.70
12,964.14ABRA MN ST LOUIS PARK UNINSURED LOSS G&A UNINSURED LOSS
12,964.14
55,000.00AD WEST END LLC ESCROWS PMC ESCROW
55,000.00
755.00ADVANCED ENG & ENVIRONMENTAL SRVCS INC WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
755.00
481.00ALL CITY ELEVATOR INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
481.00
2,695.50ALLIANCE MECH SRVCS INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE
12,322.50MUNICIPAL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
15,018.00
171.25ALLIANCE TITLE LLC WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
171.25
56.68ALPHA INVESTMENT GROUP LLC WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
56.68
3,775.75AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING INC PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
3,775.75
192.50ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS OPERATIONS REPAIRS
192.50
1,427.93ANDERSEN INC, EARL INSTALLATION OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
1,427.93
448.00APACOMM DEV PLANNING G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 2
4/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:11:24R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
2Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
4/22/20163/26/2016 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
448.00
908.13APACHE GROUP OF MINNESOTA REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES
908.13
1,356.90APPLE INC TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT
1,356.90
409.41ARCIT G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
409.41
843.52ARROW LIFT GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICE
843.52
1,600.00ASPEN LAWN SERVICE/SIPE'S ENTERPRISES IN ROUTINE MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
1,600.00
3,998.80ASPEN MILLS OPERATIONS UNIFORMS
237.48OPERATIONSEMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
4,236.28
2,234.54ATIR ELECTRIC CORPORATION FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE
2,234.54
45.44ATOMIC RECYCLING FACILITIES MCTE G & A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE
45.44PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE
45.43SEWER UTILITY G&A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE
45.44VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE
181.75
1,059.75AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
2,510.00SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
3,569.75
1,255.00AVI SYSTEMS INC TV PRODUCTION REPAIRS
1,255.00
481.25AVR INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
481.25
2,844.87BADGER METER INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 3
4/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:11:24R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
3Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
4/22/20163/26/2016 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
2,844.87
5,610.00BADGER STATE INSPECTION LLC WATER UTILITY BALANCE SHEET GENERAL
5,391.00TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT
11,001.00
36.94BARRY RENOVATIONS WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
36.94
37.50BATTERIES + BULBS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
135.90WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES
48.60SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
222.00
2,200.00BEACON ATHLETICS PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
2,200.00
96,547.00BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES
96,547.00
30.29BELANGER, CHARLES WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
30.29
24.95BETHKE, DAVID INSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
24.95
900.00BG CONSULTING INC ENVIRONMENT & SUSTAINABILITY MEETING EXPENSE
25.30ENVIRONMENT & SUSTAINABILITY BANK CHARGES/CREDIT CD FEES
925.30
150.00BOBBY & STEVE'S AUTO WORLD ARENA MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
150.00
212.50BOHN WELDING INC PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
212.50
2,256.00BOLTON & MENK INC STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
2,256.00
35.00BOTTEN, ROXENE FREESE GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
35.00
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 4
4/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:11:24R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
4Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
4/22/20163/26/2016 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
1,257.91BOUND TREE MEDICAL, LLC POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
831.63OPERATIONSOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
51.56OPERATIONSSMALL TOOLS
2,141.10
122.63BRUMMER, CRYSTAL WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
122.63
572.33BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
572.33
510.00BUREAU OF CRIM APPREHENSION CELLPHONES, IPADS, ETC.TELEPHONE
510.00
21.91BURNET TITLE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
21.91
240.00C&E AUTO UPHOLSTERY GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
240.00
25.00CAIN, JEREMY GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET CLEARING ACCOUNT
25.00
13,879.83CAMPBELL KNUTSON PROF ASSOC ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL SERVICES
462.00ENGINEERING G & A LEGAL SERVICES
561.00PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT LEGAL SERVICES
57.75SIDEWALKS & TRAILS G & A LEGAL SERVICES
7,064.77STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A LEGAL SERVICES
511.50RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
1,831.50WATER UTILITY G&A LEGAL SERVICES
132.00SOLID WASTE G&A LEGAL SERVICES
371.25UNINSURED LOSS G&A LEGAL SERVICES
24,871.60
134.84CAPITAL ONE COMMERCIAL WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
134.84
579.09CBIZ BENEFITS & INSURANCE SERVICES INC EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
579.09
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 5
4/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:11:24R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
5Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
4/22/20163/26/2016 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
463.15CBIZ FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS INC EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
463.15
10,368.56CDW GOVERNMENT INC TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT
10,368.56
1,597.12CENTER ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT MOVE-UP PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
2,780.00CES Resid Energy Conservation OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
4,377.12
2,844.94CENTERPOINT ENERGY FACILITY OPERATIONS HEATING GAS
4,079.47WATER UTILITY G&A HEATING GAS
241.54REILLY G & A HEATING GAS
120.94SEWER UTILITY G&A ELECTRIC SERVICE
216.15SEWER UTILITY G&A HEATING GAS
669.46PARK MAINTENANCE G & A HEATING GAS
84.90WESTWOOD G & A HEATING GAS
124.76NATURALIST PROGRAMMER HEATING GAS
8,382.16
10,365.63CENTRAL PENSION FUND EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S OTHER RETIREMENT
10,365.63
432.93CERTIFIED LEISURE PROPERTIES WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
432.93
254.56CINTAS CORPORATION FACILITIES MCTE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
69.43FACILITIES MCTE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
2,849.42WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
375.32VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
3,548.73
1,694.22CITIZENS INDEPENDENT BANK GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
263.06ADMINISTRATION G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
681.85ADMINISTRATION G & A MEETING EXPENSE
73.99HUMAN RESOURCES RECOGNITION
9.00HUMAN RESOURCES MEETING EXPENSE
15.35HEALTH IN THE PARK INITIATIVE GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
50.00HEALTH IN THE PARK INITIATIVE SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
1,381.38HEALTH IN THE PARK INITIATIVE TRAVEL/MEETINGS
172.35COMM & MARKETING G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 6
4/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:11:24R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
6Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
4/22/20163/26/2016 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
528.00COMM & MARKETING G & A PRINTING & PUBLISHING
29.71COMM & MARKETING G & A TRAINING
96.96IT G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
59.85IT G & A TELEPHONE
13.99ASSESSING G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
600.00ASSESSING G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
60.00FINANCE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
2,338.11FINANCE G & A TRAINING
855.00COMM DEV PLANNING G & A TRAINING
786.70FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
599.97FACILITIES MCTE G & A OFFICE EQUIPMENT
10.00FACILITIES MCTE G & A TRAINING
116.93POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
48.17POLICE G & A COMPUTER SUPPLIES
36.32POLICE G & A POSTAGE
1,616.75POLICE G & A TRAINING
289.47OPERATIONSGENERAL SUPPLIES
848.01OPERATIONSOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
450.30OPERATIONSSMALL TOOLS
491.47OPERATIONSPROTECTIVE CLOTHING
40.00OPERATIONSSUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
181.99OPERATIONSTRAINING
3,507.57OPERATIONSSEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
160.00INSPECTIONS G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
103.32ENGINEERING G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
25.72ENGINEERING G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
500.00ENGINEERING G & A TRAINING
5.00ENGINEERING G & A MEETING EXPENSE
81.95PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A TRAINING
145.98TV PRODUCTION REPAIRS
8.57OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS GENERAL SUPPLIES
885.90SEWER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
300.00SEWER UTILITY G&A TRAINING
111.66SOLID WASTE G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
50.00SOLID WASTE G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
30.00ENVIRONMENT & SUSTAINABILITY SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
30.00ENVIRONMENT & SUSTAINABILITY TRAINING
37.89TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES
3,366.14TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT
7.00ORGANIZED REC G & A TRAVEL/MEETINGS
1,000.00ADULT PROGRAMS GENERAL SUPPLIES
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 7
4/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:11:24R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
7Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
4/22/20163/26/2016 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
975.66HOLIDAY PROGRAMS GENERAL SUPPLIES
37.80SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
25.20NATURAL RESOURCES G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
534.65WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
35.00WESTWOOD G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
20.00WESTWOOD G & A TRAINING
198.72REC CENTER BUILDING OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
2,000.00VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES
18.47VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A SMALL TOOLS
265.00VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
28,906.10
337,951.50CLAREY'S SAFETY EQUIPMENT INC EQUIP/VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FIRE EQUIPMENT
337,951.50
9,177.00CLEARWATER RECREATION PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
9,177.00
20,167.65COLICH & ASSOCIATES ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL SERVICES
20,167.65
63.25COMCASTOPERATIONSEMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
18.13OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
284.55WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
13.59REC CENTER BUILDING OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
379.52
510.91COMMERCIAL ASPHALT COMPANY PATCHING-PERMANENT OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
510.91
4,335.00-COMMERCIAL REFRIGERATION SYSTEMS INC PARK IMPROVE BALANCE SHEET RETAINED PERCENTAGE
86,700.00PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
82,365.00
200.00COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING G & A TRAINING
300.00ENGINEERING G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
500.00
320.00COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT FUND MOVE-UP PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
320.00
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 8
4/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:11:24R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
8Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
4/22/20163/26/2016 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
27,279.47COMPASS MINERALS AMERICA SANDING/SALTING OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
27,279.47
240.24CONTINENTAL RESEARCH CORP REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES
240.24
290.00CORPORATE MECHANICAL REC CENTER BUILDING BUILDING MTCE SERVICE
290.00
10,106.00COVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
10,106.00
350.95CREATIVE SERVICES OF NEW ENGLAND NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
350.95
41.40CROWN MARKING INC COMM & MARKETING G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
41.40
214.41CUB FOODS POLICE G & A SUBSISTENCE SUPPLIES
214.41
2,443.16CUMMINS NPOWER LLC WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
2,675.94SEWER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
5,119.10
594.00CUSTOM PRODUCTS & SERVICES SSD 1 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
280.50SSD 2 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
346.50SSD 3 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
511.50SSD #4 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
379.50SSD #5 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
264.00SSD #6 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
2,376.00
2,308.20DAKOTA SUPPLY GROUP WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
2,308.20
69.45DALCO ENTERPRISES INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SUPPLY
1,115.74GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SUPPLY
175.91REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES
1,361.10
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 9
4/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:11:24R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
9Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
4/22/20163/26/2016 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
372.67DELI DOUBLE WESTWOOD G & A CONCESSION SUPPLIES
372.67
6,199.60DEPT LABOR & INDUSTRY INSPECTIONS G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS
6,199.60
130.00DEX MEDIA EAST LLC ENTERPRISE G & A ADVERTISING
130.00
280.80DH ATHLETICS LLC PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
280.80
397.00DISTINCTIVE PRINT INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
397.00
4,500.00DJ ELECTRIC SERVICES INC PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
33,000.00PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES
185.34REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES
37,685.34
2,525.72DO-GOOD.BIZ INC COMM & MARKETING G & A POSTAGE
201.04COMM & MARKETING G & A PRINTING & PUBLISHING
2,726.76
1,000.00DOLGOLEVICH, LILIYA ESCROWS PMC ESCROW
1,000.00
262.50DOMEK, KAREN GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
262.50
267.50DON'S RODENTS WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
267.50
280.00EARTH RATED PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
280.00
290.75ECM PUBLISHERS INC ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL NOTICES
378.00ADMINISTRATION G & A PRINTING & PUBLISHING
1,649.00COMM & MARKETING G & A ADVERTISING
297.50STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A LEGAL NOTICES
92.00STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 10
4/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:11:24R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
10Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
4/22/20163/26/2016 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
86.25CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
2,793.50
96.68EDINA REALTY WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
96.68
415.00-EGAN COMPANIES INC PARK IMPROVE BALANCE SHEET RETAINED PERCENTAGE
8,300.00PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
7,885.00
123.66EISOLD, JASON ORGANIZED REC G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR
123.66
643.20ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIR WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
643.20
321.64EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
321.64
284.71EMERGENCY RESPONSE SOLUTIONS ARENA MAINTENANCE OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
284.71
1,515.12ENTERPRISE FM TRUST VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A RENTAL EQUIPMENT
1,515.12
275.00EPIC SECURITY PROFESSIONALS INC PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
275.00
600.96ERICKSEN ROED & ASSOCIATES PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES
600.96
882.00ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
882.00
15,000.00EVERBRIDGE INC E-911 PROGRAM TELEPHONE
15,000.00
56.80EVERS, ROBERT REC CENTER BUILDING OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
56.80
66.47EVIDENT INC POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 11
4/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:11:24R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
11Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
4/22/20163/26/2016 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
66.47
102.22FACTORY MOTOR PARTS CO GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
359.00VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES
461.22
173.63FALESCHINI, ISAAC WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
173.63
12.61FASTENAL COMPANY PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
10.57REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES
23.18
54.02FEDEXHUMAN RESOURCES RECRUITMENT
54.02
49.90FEINBERG, GREG WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
49.90
4,278.19-FERGUSON WATERWORKS WATER UTILITY BALANCE SHEET RETAINED PERCENTAGE
396,381.96WATER UTILITY G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
392,103.77
80.99FERRELLGASREC CENTER BUILDING MOTOR FUELS
80.99
1,380.50FIRE SAFETY USA INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
644.90OPERATIONSSMALL TOOLS
2,025.40
13,925.00FISCHER BROS LLC PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
13,925.00
270.72FISCHER MINING LLC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
270.72
1,740.00FISCHLER & ASSOCIATES PA HUMAN RESOURCES RECRUITMENT
1,740.00
200.00FLEX COMPENSATION INC EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
200.00
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 12
4/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:11:24R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
12Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
4/22/20163/26/2016 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
66.00FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
66.00
60.50FOKUO, AMY HOUSING REHAB G & A MEETING EXPENSE
60.50
49.68FRANCIS, ERICK ENGINEERING G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR
49.68
23.24FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
13.28ROUTINE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT PARTS
36.52
52.02FREEDMAN, BREANNA HUMAN RIGHTS MEETING EXPENSE
52.02
123.56G & K SERVICES REC CENTER BUILDING OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
123.56
592.96GARDEN & ASSOCIATES INC COMM & MARKETING G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
592.96
150.00GARDENING MATTERS BEAUTIFICATION / FLOWERS SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
150.00
5,595.00GARTNER REFRIG & MFG INC UNINSURED LOSS G&A UNINSURED LOSS
861.84ARENA MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
6,456.84
55.59GAUSLAND, GREG WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
55.59
2,929.00GERTENSPARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
2,929.00
539.40GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
539.40
173.79GRAINGER INC, WW GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
84.34FACILITIES MCTE G & A BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 13
4/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:11:24R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
13Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
4/22/20163/26/2016 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
183.67GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES
441.80
467.04GROUP HEALTH INC - WORKSITE EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A HEALTH INSURANCE
467.04
965.00H & L MESABI GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
965.00
5,940.00H & R CONST CO UNINSURED LOSS G&A UNINSURED LOSS
5,940.00
382.89HACH CO WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES
382.89
2,500.00HAMLINE UNIVERSITY STORM WATER UTILITY G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
2,500.00
42.91HARMON, JODIE WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
42.91
3,709.46HAWKINS INC WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
3,709.46
267.00HEALTHPARTNERSOPERATIONSHEALTH & WELLNESS
267.00
34.26HEISER, DEBRA HEALTH IN THE PARK INITIATIVE TRAVEL/MEETINGS
34.26
233.00HENDEL PLUMBING WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
233.00
2,568.00HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER OPERATIONS TRAINING
2,568.00
75.50HENNEPIN COUNTY RESIDENT & REAL ESTATE ASSESSING G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
75.50
2,322.50HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER POLICE G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
7,121.70POLICE G & A SUBSISTENCE SERVICE
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 14
4/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:11:24R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
14Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
4/22/20163/26/2016 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
1,672.20OPERATIONSRADIO COMMUNICATIONS
2,700.00PARK IMPROVEMENT G & A PAYMENT IN LIEU OF TAXES
316.06PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE
14,132.46
120.00HENRICKSEN PSG FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE
2,064.25MUNICIPAL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
2,184.25
142.56HIRSHFIELDSFACILITIES MCTE G & A BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES
580.76WATER UTILITY G&A BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES
723.32
1,833.75HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP INC GENERAL INFORMATION GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1,833.75
66.88HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES FACILITIES MCTE G & A BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES
28.93ROUTINE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT PARTS
8.34ROUTINE MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
159.97DAMAGE REPAIR SMALL TOOLS
434.93WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
283.68PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
231.04PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES
637.75REC CENTER BUILDING OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
1,851.52
250.00HOME TITLE INC WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
250.00
173.65HONDA TOWN GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
173.65
57.20HOUCK, GILDA INSPECTIONS G & A ELECTRICAL
104.00INSPECTIONS G & A PLUMBING
161.20
26.39HOWARD, ADAM WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
26.39
495.00HOWES, JEFFREY VOLLEYBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
495.00
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 15
4/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:11:24R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
15Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
4/22/20163/26/2016 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
1,401.90I.U.O.E. LOCAL NO 49 EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S UNION DUES
1,401.90
150.00IACPPOLICE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
150.00
19.00IATNVEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
19.00
1,037.46IMPACT PROVEN SOLUTIONS WATER UTILITY G&A POSTAGE
1,037.46SEWER UTILITY G&A POSTAGE
1,037.45SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS POSTAGE
1,037.44STORM WATER UTILITY G&A POSTAGE
4,149.81
242.59INDELCOROUTINE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT PARTS
460.53WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
39.12IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
742.24
610.00INDEPENDENT BLACK DIRT CO PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
610.00
456.20INGRAM, LUKE ENGINEERING G & A TRAVEL/MEETINGS
456.20
2,287.80INTEGRA TELECOM IT G & A TELEPHONE
2,287.80
987.20INTERNATIONAL TAE KWON DO ACADEMY SAFETY CAMPS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
987.20
611.92INVER GROVE FORD GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
611.92
133.81I-STATE TRUCK CENTER GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
133.81
58.60J&D 14-93 LP WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
58.60
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 16
4/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:11:24R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
16Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
4/22/20163/26/2016 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
1,893.29JEFFERSON FIRE & SAFETY INC OPERATIONS PROTECTIVE CLOTHING
2,255.00EQUIP/VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FIRE EQUIPMENT
4,148.29
33.72JERRY'S HARDWARE DAMAGE REPAIR SMALL TOOLS
210.32WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT PARTS
160.23PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
21.09PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
425.36
2,200.00JOBSINMINNEAPOLIS.COM HUMAN RESOURCES RECRUITMENT
2,200.00
225.75JOHNSON, LAUREN GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
225.75
452.05KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
452.05
503.08KELLER, JASMINE Z EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S WAGE GARNISHMENTS
503.08
172.35KENNEDY & GRAVEN ESCROWS OPPIDAN - BALLY'S SITE
172.35
184.00KIDCREATE STUDIO PLAYGROUND COLLABORATIVE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
184.00
539.00KILLMER ELECTRIC CO INC WIRING REPAIR OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
539.00
262.50KINNEY, MATTHEW GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
262.50
217.08KIVEL, PHILIP OPERATIONS SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
217.08
275.00KOSALKO, JONNA GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
275.00
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 17
4/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:11:24R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
17Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
4/22/20163/26/2016 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
2,541.23KREMER SERVICES LLC GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
2,541.23
2,737.33KRISS PREMIUM PRODUCTS INC PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES
641.50REC CENTER BUILDING OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
3,378.83
95.00LARSON, JH CO SYSTEM REPAIR OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
95.00
2,828.15LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES INC EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S UNION DUES
2,828.15
328.13LAWSON PRODUCTS INC REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES
328.13
1,003.83LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INSURANCE TRUST UNINSURED LOSS G&A UNINSURED LOSS
1,003.83
225.00LEVIN ARCHITECTS, CHARLES GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
225.00
267.00LIBERTY ENVELOPE COMM & MARKETING G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
267.00
162.74LIBERTY TITLE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
162.74
31,345.00LIFE SAFETY SYSTEMS MUNICIPAL BLDG OFFICE EQUIPMENT
31,345.00
345.60LIFE SUPPORT INNOVATIONS OPERATIONS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
345.60
27.46LINHART, LENNICE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
27.46
1,311.20LITIN PAPER, PACKAGING & CONVERTING SOLID WASTE G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
1,311.20
262.50LITTLE, KARIA GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 18
4/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:11:24R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
18Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
4/22/20163/26/2016 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
262.50
40,842.00LOGISIT G & A COMPUTER SERVICES
6,601.18TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT
47,443.18
4,409.00LUBRICATION TECHNOLOGIES INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
4,409.00
40.00MACGREGOR-HANNAH, MAREN INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
40.00
298,257.14MACQUEEN EQUIP CO GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
630.82SEWER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT PARTS
1,458.58SEWER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
300,346.54
14,218.03MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
14,218.03
262.50MARTINSON, PHIL GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
262.50
1,752.22MAVITY, ANNE ADMINISTRATION G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
1,752.22
135.98MCCOY, WILLIAM PETROLEUM FUELS INC PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
135.98
225.00MCMONIGAL ARCHITECTS LLC GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
225.00
300.00MDEWAKANTON PUBLIC SAFETY OPERATIONS TRAINING
300.00
46.00MDHWATER UTILITY G&A LICENSES
46.00
41.97MENARDSPOLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
126.12ROUTINE MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
49.35DAMAGE REPAIR SMALL TOOLS
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 19
4/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:11:24R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
19Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
4/22/20163/26/2016 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
32.85DAMAGE REPAIR OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
32.97INSTALLATIONEQUIPMENT PARTS
19.92WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES
75.30PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
138.00PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES
17.99PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
138.46WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
164.98ARENA MAINTENANCE OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
837.91
2,770.00METRO GENERAL SERVICES INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
2,770.00
747.00METRO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS VOLLEYBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
747.00
54,123.30METROPOLITAN COUNCIL INSPECTIONS G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS
2,975.00WATER UTILITY G&A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE
2,405.54REILLY BUDGET CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE
348,097.01OPERATIONSCLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE
407,600.85
19.99MICRO CENTER WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES
19.99
3,440.00MID AMERICA BUSINESS SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT
3,440.00
6,819.99MILLER DUNWIDDIE ARCHITECTURE PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
6,819.99
200.00MILLER, ALLYSON GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
200.00
50.00MILLER, JAMES GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
50.00
136.38MINIKAHDA VISTA NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN HOUSING REHAB BALANCE SHEET CONTRACTS PAYABLE
136.38
506.70MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPT PAWN FEES OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 20
4/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:11:24R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
20Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
4/22/20163/26/2016 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
506.70
149.07MINNESOTA BENEFIT ASSOC EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S ACCRUED OTHER BENEFITS
149.07
1,995.00MINNESOTA BUREAU CRIMINAL APPREHENSION POLICE G & A TRAINING
1,995.00
147.66MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PYT CTR EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S WAGE GARNISHMENTS
147.66
1,875.00MINNESOTA CIT OFFICER'S ASSN POLICE G & A TRAINING
1,875.00
50.00MINNESOTA DEPT HEALTH REILLY BUDGET LICENSES
50.00
50.00MINNESOTA FIRE CHIEFS ASSOCIATION OPERATIONS FIRE PREVENTION SUPPLIES
50.00
300.00MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
300.00
45.00MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY SEWER UTILITY G&A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
45.00
445.00MINNESOTA WANNER COMPANY PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
445.00
821.40MINUTEMAN PRESS COMM & MARKETING G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
50.00COMM & MARKETING G & A ADVERTISING
871.40
1,250.00MINVALCO INC WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
1,250.00
50.00MIPNNATURAL RESOURCES G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
50.00
621.25M-K GRAPHICS FINANCE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
621.25
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 21
4/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:11:24R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
21Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
4/22/20163/26/2016 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
145.00MN AWWA WATER UTILITY G&A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
145.00
200.00MN DEPT LABOR & INDUSTRY FACILITIES MCTE G & A LICENSES
200.00
1,250.00MOBIUS INC HEALTH IN THE PARK INITIATIVE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1,250.00
10.00MOE, INGRID WESTWOOD G & A PROGRAM REVENUE
10.00
107.00MORRISON, GARY COMM DEV PLANNING G & A TRAINING
107.00
705.00MOSS & BARNETT FRANCHISE ADMINISTRATION OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
705.00
224,674.72MOTOROLAPOLICE & FIRE PENSION G&A MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENT
224,674.72
25.00MPCAGENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
45.00SEWER UTILITY G&A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
70.00
1,400.00MRA-THE MANAGEMENT ASSOC HUMAN RESOURCES SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
1,400.00
150.00MSANIPOLICE G & A TRAINING
150.00
2,336.10MTI DISTRIBUTING CO GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
2,336.10
120.00MUNICI-PALS ADMINISTRATION G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
120.00FINANCE G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
60.00ORGANIZED REC G & A TRAINING
300.00
260.00MVTL LABORATORIES REILLY BUDGET OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 22
4/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:11:24R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
22Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
4/22/20163/26/2016 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
260.00
928.09NAPA (GENUINE PARTS CO)GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
70.53OPERATIONSSMALL TOOLS
27.49DAMAGE REPAIR OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
159.00WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT PARTS
103.14REC CENTER BUILDING OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
305.48VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES
1,593.73
63.60NARTEC INC POLICE G & A TRAINING
63.60
379.40ND CHILD SUPPORT DIVISION EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S WAGE GARNISHMENTS
379.40
970.00NEENAH FOUNDREY DAMAGE REPAIR OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
970.00
19.44NOKELBY, BRIAN WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
19.44
200.00NOKOMIS SHOE SHOP WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
200.00
346.88NORTH AMERICAN TITLE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
346.88
15,234.38NORTHEAST TREE INC TREE MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
15,234.38
1,052.12NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
1,052.12
1,376.12NORTHLAND MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE
1,376.12
5,777.30NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMM & MARKETING G & A POSTAGE
16,571.93COMM & MARKETING G & A PRINTING & PUBLISHING
22,349.23
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 23
4/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:11:24R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
23Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
4/22/20163/26/2016 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
581.20OAK KNOLL ANIMAL HOSPITAL POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
581.20
57.21OFFICE DEPOT ADMINISTRATION G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
64.79HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICE SUPPLIES
413.13COMM & MARKETING G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
338.80COMM & MARKETING G & A PRINTING & PUBLISHING
333.76ASSESSING G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
25.58POLICE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
28.29POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
246.12OPERATIONSOFFICE SUPPLIES
272.08INSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
32.24PUBLIC WORKS G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
95.27WESTWOOD G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
63.36VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A OFFICE SUPPLIES
1,970.63
6.01OLEVITCH, LAURA WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
6.01
399.82OLSON, MARNEY HOUSING REHAB G & A MEETING EXPENSE
399.82
53.00ON SITE SANITATION NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
8.31FIELD MAINT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
103.50ICE RENTAL NON-TAXABLE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
164.81
39.53ON SITE TITLE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
39.53
265.61OXYGEN SERVICE COMPANY INC OPERATIONS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
265.61
310.50PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES INC REILLY BUDGET OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
310.50
262.50PARSONS, RICHARD GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
262.50
49.52PATRICK, MICHEAL WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 24
4/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:11:24R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
24Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
4/22/20163/26/2016 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
49.52
375.00PERNSTEINER CREATIVE GROUP INC COMM & MARKETING G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
475.00COMM & MARKETING G & A ADVERTISING
850.00
7.00PETTY CASH POLICE G & A TRAVEL/MEETINGS
7.00
794.08PFM ASSET MANAGEMENT CITY POOLED INVESTMENTS BANK CHARGES/CREDIT CD FEES
794.08
215.00PLANT & FLANGED EQUIPMENT WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
215.00
680.91PLANTRA INC REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
680.91
351.40POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
301.00GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
652.40
235.89POPP.COM INC PARK MAINTENANCE G & A TELEPHONE
235.89
2,500.00PRAETORIAN DIGITAL OPERATIONS GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
2,500.00
275.00PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
275.00
210.34PRECISE MRM LLC PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENT
210.33WATER UTILITY G&A MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENT
210.34SEWER UTILITY G&A MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENT
210.33STORM WATER UTILITY G&A MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENT
841.34
19.00PREMIUM WATERS INC OPERATIONS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
19.00
200.00PRINTERS SERVICE INC ARENA MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 25
4/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:11:24R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
25Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
4/22/20163/26/2016 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
200.00
111.64PRISM TITLE & CLOSING SERVICE LTD WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
111.64
137.50PROGRESSIVE CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC WATER UTILITY G&A ENGINEERING SERVICES
137.50
8,450.00PSC ALLIANCE INC TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT
8,450.00
460.00PULSE PRODUCTS INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE
460.00
62.00PUMP & METER SERVICE ROUTINE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT PARTS
62.00
942.60Q3 CONTRACTING WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
942.60
45.36QUICKSILVER EXPRESS COURIER HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL SUPPLIES
45.36
6,644.30R & R SPECIALTIES ARENA MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
6,644.30
2,796.98RANDY'S SANITATION INC FACILITY OPERATIONS GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE
1,671.06REC CENTER BUILDING GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE
4,468.04
11,280.84REACH FOR RESOURCES INC COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
11,280.84
14,000.00RED CEDAR STEEL ERECTORS INC MUNICIPAL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
14,000.00
162.38REGENCY OFFICE PRODUCTS LLC POLICE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
64.44POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
226.82
450.00REHKAMP LARSON ARCHITECTS INC GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 26
4/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:11:24R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
26Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
4/22/20163/26/2016 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
450.00
8,545.00REHRIG PACIFIC CO SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS OTHER
8,545.00
1,068.00REINDERS INC PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
1,068.00
4,340.71RICOH USA INC IT G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
4,340.71
83.40RMS RENTALS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
83.40
100.00ROGERS, KYLE BROOMBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
100.00
99.00ROTARY CLUB OF SLP POLICE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
190.00POLICE G & A TRAVEL/MEETINGS
289.00
54.15SAAR, HOLLY WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
54.15
10,806.90SAFEASSURE CONSULTANTS INC EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
10,806.90
1,206.07SAFE-FAST INC WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
1,206.07
80.41SAM'S CLUB NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
317.14HOLIDAY PROGRAMS GENERAL SUPPLIES
397.55
225.00SAVAGE, GENE GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
225.00
1,230.00SAVATREETREE DISEASE PRIVATE CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE
1,230.00
416.10SCAN AIR FILTER INC REC CENTER BUILDING OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 27
4/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:11:24R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
27Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
4/22/20163/26/2016 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
416.10
543.97SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO.PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
543.97
17,763.00SCHMITZ CONSTRUCTION CO LLC, J P WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
17,763.00
7,363.07SEHSTREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
4,950.00WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
12,313.07
150.00SELLNER, GEORGE GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
150.00
1,000.00SERGENT, DEAN ESCROWS PMC ESCROW
1,000.00
14,940.00SHAWN, JACK BASKETBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
14,940.00
102.33SHRED-IT USA MINNEAPOLIS ADMINISTRATION G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
11.77FINANCE G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
125.34POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
10.65OPERATIONSGENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
12.53INSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
12.53WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
12.53ORGANIZED REC G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
287.68
123.07SHREWSBURY, NANCY WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
123.07
89.43SIGEL, MELVIN REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
89.43
558.00SIGN PRODUCERS INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
558.00
335.00SILVERMERE AMERICA LLC FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
335.00
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 28
4/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:11:24R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
28Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
4/22/20163/26/2016 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
92.87SKELLY, GABRIEL HOUSING REHAB BALANCE SHEET CONTRACTS PAYABLE
92.87
1,379.10SLP FF ASSOC IAFF LOCAL #993 EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S UNION DUES
1,379.10
36.95SMITH, LAURA HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
280.05HEALTH IN THE PARK INITIATIVE TRAVEL/MEETINGS
317.00
1,297.89SPANO, JAKE ADMINISTRATION G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
1,297.89
2,023.97SPRINTIT G & A DATACOMMUNICATIONS
2,023.97
240.64SPS COMPANIES INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
240.64
1,008.00ST PAUL, CITY OF POLICE G & A TRAINING
1,008.00
37.90STAR TRIBUNE SOLID WASTE G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
37.90
30.98STATZ, DUSTIN WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
30.98
4,917.04STEVENS ENGINEERS INC PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
4,917.04
757.39STREICHER'S POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
67.98OPERATIONSUNIFORMS
825.37
708.33SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY WATER UTILITY G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
708.33SEWER UTILITY G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
708.34STORM WATER UTILITY G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
2,125.00
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 29
4/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:11:24R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
29Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
4/22/20163/26/2016 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
1,120.00SUMMIT ENVIROSOLUTIONS INC STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
19,025.45REILLY BUDGET GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
20,145.45
884.00SUN CONTROL OF MINNESOTA INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE
884.00
257.00SWANASOLID WASTE G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
257.00
2,301.00SWANSON & YOUNGDALE INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
2,301.00
150.47SWEET, DANIELLE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
150.47
4,050.00SWENSON, STEVEN PERFORMING ARTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
4,050.00
101.46TERMINAL SUPPLY CO VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES
101.46
112.64TERMINIX INT REC CENTER BUILDING BUILDING MTCE SERVICE
112.64
8.00TEXA TONKA TAILORING OPERATIONS GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
8.00
209.92THE CHIMNEY PRO INSPECTIONS G & A BUILDING
209.92
1,548.25-THELEN HEATING & ROOFING INC PARK IMPROVE BALANCE SHEET RETAINED PERCENTAGE
30,965.00PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
29,416.75
1,150.00THERMO-DYNE INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
1,150.00
2,000.00THISTLE HOLDINGS LLC ESCROWS PMC ESCROW
2,000.00
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 30
4/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:11:24R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
30Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
4/22/20163/26/2016 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
170.00THOMSON REUTERS WEST PAYMENT CENTER POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
170.00
128.65THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT NATURE CENTER ATTENDANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
128.65
839.24THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR REC CENTER BUILDING OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
839.24
500.00TIGER OAK PUBLICATIONS COMM & MARKETING G & A ADVERTISING
500.00
1,021.50TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL ADMINISTRATION G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1,021.50
443.31TITAN MACHINERY GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
443.31
345.03TITLE SMART WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
345.03
12.66TITLESMART INC WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
12.66
1,091.24TKDAWATER UTILITY G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
1,091.24
1,042.00TOWMASTERGENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
1,042.00
10.83TRADEMARK TITLE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
10.83
4,940.20TRI STATE BOBCAT GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
4,940.20
167.00TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICE
167.00
1,080.00UHL CO INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
20,068.50PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 31
4/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:11:24R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
31Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
4/22/20163/26/2016 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
9,836.50TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT
30,985.00
442.23ULINEOPERATIONSPROTECTIVE CLOTHING
442.23
125.39UNIFORMS UNLIMITED (PD)POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
125.39
316.00UNITED WAY OF MINNEAPOLIS AREA EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S UNITED WAY
316.00
425.00UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE POLICE G & A TRAINING
425.00
160.00UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BEAUTIFICATION / FLOWERS GENERAL SUPPLIES
160.00
1,990.00UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-EXTENSION TRAINING SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
1,990.00
743.79USA BLUE BOOK SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
1,137.80IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
1,881.59
865.80VAIL, LORI HUMAN RESOURCES RECOGNITION
865.80
22.06-VALLEY PAVING INC STREET CAPITAL PROJ BAL SHEET RETAINED PERCENTAGE
2,256.27CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
2,234.21
199.73VARITECH INDUSTRIES INC ROUTINE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT PARTS
199.73
109.08VAUGHAN, JIM NATURAL RESOURCES G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR
109.08
46.54VEIT, JOSH WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
46.54
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 32
4/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:11:24R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
32Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
4/22/20163/26/2016 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
40.00VERIFIED CREDENTIALS HUMAN RESOURCES RECRUITMENT
40.00
10,903.48VERIZON WIRELESS CELLPHONES, IPADS, ETC.OFFICE EQUIPMENT
70.20CELLPHONES, IPADS, ETC.TELEPHONE
10,973.68
2,000.00VITALE, KRISTINE ESCROWS PMC ESCROW
2,000.00
9.55WAGER, KEVIN WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
9.55
551.70WALTHER, SEAN HEALTH IN THE PARK INITIATIVE TRAVEL/MEETINGS
551.70
3,121.60WASHINGTON COUNTY COMMUNICATIONS/GV REIMBURSEABL EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
3,121.60
278.05WASKEY, SHANE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
278.05
1,096.61WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
1,096.61
2,300.00WATSONFACILITIES MCTE G & A OFFICE EQUIPMENT
2,300.00
92.34WEST, JASON ORGANIZED REC G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR
92.34
429.09WEST, RUTAGER FACILITIES MCTE G & A OFFICE EQUIPMENT
429.09
93.06WHEELER HARDWARE FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
93.06
3,282.40WHEELER LUMBER LLC PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
878.00PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES
455.40SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
4,615.80
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 33
4/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:11:24R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
33Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
4/22/20163/26/2016 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
1,000.00WHITE, STEVEN ESCROWS PMC ESCROW
1,000.00
810.00WILLMAR WOOD PRODUCTS INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE
810.00
30.00WRAP CITY GRAPHICS NATURAL RESOURCES G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
45.00REC CENTER BUILDING OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
75.00
274.00WSB ASSOC INC ENGINEERING G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
9,003.25STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
15,658.50STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
24,935.75
24.30XCEL ENERGY OPERATIONS EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
24,199.25PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE
20,018.21WATER UTILITY G&A ELECTRIC SERVICE
2,069.85REILLY BUDGET ELECTRIC SERVICE
16,064.38STORM WATER UTILITY G&A ELECTRIC SERVICE
33.99BRICK HOUSE (1324)ELECTRIC SERVICE
38.07WW RENTAL HOUSE (1322)ELECTRIC SERVICE
484.62WESTWOOD G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE
13,805.02REC CENTER BUILDING ELECTRIC SERVICE
76,737.69
90.06YSETH, TYLER WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
90.06
18.65ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
50.45WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES
5.45PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
251.05VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES
325.60
275.16ZEP MFG VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES
275.16
2,658.10ZIEGLER INC PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
2,658.10
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 34
4/25/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:11:24R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
34Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
4/22/20163/26/2016 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
1,023.00ZIP PRINTING COMM & MARKETING G & A PRINTING & PUBLISHING
340.64ASSESSING G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
125.88NATURAL RESOURCES G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
1,489.52
Report Totals 2,900,216.14
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 35
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: May 2, 2016
Consent Agenda Item: 4b
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Temporary On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License – Finnegans Community Fund
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Approve a Temporary On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor
License for Finnegans Community Fund at Gamble Drive and the adjacent privately owned
parking lot in West End for May 21, 2016.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: Have all of the requirements been met to allow the issuance of
the temporary on-sale intoxicating liquor license?
BACKGROUND: Finnegans Community Fund has made application for a Temporary On-Sale
Intoxicating Liquor License for the City Pages 25th Annual Beer Festival to be held for the first
time at the West End Festival Site on Saturday, May 21, from 4:30-9 p.m. The festival will include
food vendors, beer sampling, and live entertainment. Finnegans Community Fund has provided
proof of liquor liability insurance coverage for the festival. The applicant is working with
Operations & Recreation staff to coordinate use of the site and details of the event, including
obtaining the necessary approvals from the City Fire and Police Departments.
Founded in 2000 in Minneapolis, Finnegans is a self-sustaining social business. Their mission is
“to create sustainable change for those affected by hunger through profits from Finnegans Irish
Amber and Finnegans Blonde Ale, and other innovative products and events.
The Police Department has completed the background investigation on the principals of Finnegans
Community Fund and has found no reason to deny the temporary license. The applicant has met
all requirements for issuance of the license, and staff is recommending approval.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The fee for a temporary liquor license is
$100 per day of the event.
VISION CONSIDERATION: Not Applicable.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: None
Prepared by: Kay Midura, Office Assistant – City Clerk’s Office
Reviewed by: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: May 2, 2016
Consent Agenda Item: 4c
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Bid Tabulation: 2016 Municipal State Aid Project No. 4016-1100
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to designate Hardrives, Inc. as the lowest responsible
bidder and authorize execution of a contract with them in the amount of $661,279.87 for the 2016
Municipal State Aid (MSA) Project No. 4016-1100.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish to continue to implement our
Pavement Management program?
SUMMARY: A total of five (5) bids were received for this project. A summary of the bid results
is shown below:
CONTRACTOR BID AMOUNT
Hardrives, Inc. $661,279.87
Bituminous Roadways Inc. $674,604.50
Midwest Asphalt Corporation $685,773.50
C.S. McCrossan Construction Inc.
Park Construction Company
$796,078.30
$799,388.69
Engineer’s Estimate
$688,826.00
A review of the bids indicates Hardrives, Inc. submitted the lowest bid. Hardrives, Inc. is a
reputable contractor that has successfully completed worked for the City before. Staff
recommends that a contract be awarded to the contractor in the amount of $661,279.87.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: This project is included in the City’s Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) for 2016. The total estimated project cost in the CIP, including
administration and contingency, is $825,664. Based on the slighty lower construction costs, the
total project cost is now estimated to be $820,106. Funding will be provided by a combination of
MSA and Utility Funds. Additional information regarding funding can be found in the Discussion
section of the report.
VISION CONSIDERATION: Not Applicable
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion
Map of Flag Avenue
Map of Quentin Avenue
Prepared by: Joseph Shamla, Senior Engineering Project Manager
Reviewed by: Debra M. Heiser, Engineering Director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4c) Page 2
Title: Bid Tabulation: 2016 Municipal State Aid Project No. 4016-1100
DISCUSSION
BACKGROUND: Flag Avenue and Quentin Avenue are MSA roads which are funded by a gas
tax through the State. In order to qualify for funding, the roads must be constructed to state aid
standards. What follows is a description of the scope of this project.
Pavement Rehabilitation:
The pavement preservation technique chosen by staff for the 2016 MSA Project on Flag Avenue
and Quentin Avenue is a two inch mill and overlay. A team of staff members from Streets, Utilities,
and Engineering worked together to select streets and to recommend appropriate rehabilitation
techniques for inclusion in this year’s MSA Project. In addition to the overlay, Flag Avenue will
also have the curb ramps upgraded to meet the American with Disabilities Act (ADA). Sidewalk,
curb and gutter will also be replaced as needed on Flag Avenue.
Utility Repair:
Flag Avenue will also undergo utility repairs and upgrades. The utility department has assessed
the existing utilities along the corridor and made recommendations based on their findings. The
water main on the north end of Flag Avenue between 18th Street and Franklin Avenue consists of
a 12 inch main and a 6 inch main with services connected to the houses. The 6 inch main has
deteriorated and has had several water main breaks. Since the capacity of the 6 inch water main
is not needed, the 6 inch main will be abandoned in place and the house services will be connected
to the 12 inch main. There are also water main valves, storm sewer, and sanitary sewer repairs
needed on Flag Avenue which will be completed with this project.
There is no recommended public utility repairs on Quentin Avenue.
Parking:
MSA standards require a 32 foot minimum road width to allow parking on one side of the street.
Due to this requirement, no parking will be implemented on both sides of Flag Avenue between
18th Street and the northerly entrance to Minneapolis Golf Course since it is only 30 feet wide in
this area. Flag Avenue is 32 feet wide between Cedar Lake Road and the northern entrance to the
Minneapolis Golf Course, requiring parking to only be restricted on one side of the street. In order
to maximize the amount of parking staff is recommending allowing parking on the side of the
street with the least amount of driveways.
There is no change proposed to parking on Quentin Avenue.
Private Utility Construction
Utility companies were contacted to inform them of the city’s proposed construction work and
schedule. CenterPoint Energy has indicated that they will be installing new gas main lines and
service lines on Flag Avenue starting next week. CenterPoint Energy is estimating that it will take
one month to complete the installation of the new gas lines.
Public Process:
An open house was held in January 2016 as an opportunity for residents to learn more about the
proposed 2016 MSA Project and to gain insight on the proposed plans. There were ten property
owners in attendance at this meeting. The two areas of discussion were the limitation on parking
and the duration of construction. The residents were concerned on the length of construction due
to the project which happened north of them in 2015. Due to the scope of the project, a mill and
overlay, the construction length for Flag Avenue will be significantly shorter.
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4c) Page 3
Title: Bid Tabulation: 2016 Municipal State Aid Project No. 4016-1100
Financial Consideration: This project was included in the City’s Capital Improvement Program
(CIP) for 2016. Below is a summary of the costs and funding sources.
Estimate Low Bid
Construction Cost $688,054 $661,279.87
Contingency (10%) $68,805 $66,127.99
Engineering & Administration $68,805 $92,698.08
Total $825,664.00 $820,105.94
Funding Sources
Municipal State Aid $629,618 $600,580.79
Water Utility Fund $168,410 $193,784.27
Sanitary Utility Fund $27,636 $25,740.88
Total $825,664.00 $820,105.94
Construction Timeline:
Should the City Council approve this construction contract, the following schedule is proposed:
CenterPoint Energy gas line installation May – June 2016
Construction of Flag / Quentin Avenue June – September 2016
The project construction is anticipated to be completed in two months. During this work, residents
will nearly always have access to their driveways. However, driveways will not be accessible for
7 days where concrete aprons are replaced. Staff is working with the Minneapolis Golf Course to
coordinate construction this summer due to the number of events taking place for the 100 year
anniversary.
Minneapolis Golf Course
KILMER
POND
CEDAR
MANOR
LAKE
HANNAN
LAKE
MPLS GOLF
COURSE 1
£¤169
BOONEAVESCEDAR LAKE RD
CLUB RD
24TH ST W
BOONEAVESVIRGINIA CIR N
JORDANAVES18TH ST W
23RD ST W
24TH LN W
24TH ST W
YUKON
AVE
SZINRANAVESFLAGAVESFRAN
K
L
I
N
AVE
W
GETTYSBURGAVESFRONTAGE RDHILLSBOROAVESF R A N K L I N AV E W WESTMORELANDLN
DECATURAVESCAVELLAVESAQUILAAVES22ND LN W
MELROSEAVES
23RD ST W
22ND ST W
STANLEN RD
25TH ST WFAIRWAY LNINDEPENDENCEAVESKI
LMERAVE
PARKER RD
VIRGINIA CIR S
2016 MSA CIP (Area 1)
Ü
Legend
Street Rehabilitation
Watermain and Street Rehabilitation
Railroad
Lakes
Parcels
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 Feet
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2015 (Item No. 4c)
Title: Bid Tabulation: 2016 Municipal State Aid Project No. 4016-1100 Page 4
¬«100
OLD CEDAR LAK E RD
HILL LN S
CEDA
R
L
A
K
E
R
D OTTAWAAVESPRINCETONAVESSB HWY100 S TO PARKD DRNB HWY100 S TO EB I394QUENTI
NAVESQUENTINAVESQUENTINAVES2 3 R D S T W
2016 MSA CIP (Area 2)
Ü
Legend
MSA Street Rehab
Railroad
Lakes
Parcels
0 200 400 600 800 Feet
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2015 (Item No. 4c)
Title: Bid Tabulation: 2016 Municipal State Aid Project No. 4016-1100 Page 5
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: May 2, 2016
Consent Agenda Item: 4d
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Bid Tabulation: Award Bid for Connect the Park! Bikeway Project (Project # 4015-2000)
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to designate Century Fence Company as the lowest
responsible bidder and authorize execution of a contract with them in the amount of $125,760.40
for the Connect the Park! Bikeway Project Number 4015-2000.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish to continue to implement our
Connect the Park! Program? (Note - these improvements were approved by Council in September
of 2015. Due to unfavorable fall bidding prices, staff suggested bidding the project in Spring 2016
to take advantage of a better bidding climate to get lower bids)
SUMMARY: A total of three (3) bids were received for this project. A summary of the bid results
is shown below:
CONTRACTOR BID AMOUNT
Century Fence Company $125,760.40
Sir Lines-A-Lot $128,811.80
AAA Striping Service Co. $140,447.30
Engineer’s Estimate
$156,784.45
A review of the bids indicates Century Fence Company submitted the lowest bid. Century Fence
is a reputable contractor that has successfully completed worked for the City before. Staff
recommends that a contract be awarded to the contractor in the amount of $125,760.40.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: This project is included in the City’s Capital
Improvement Program. Funding will be provided by proceeds from General Obligation Bonds.
Additional information regarding funding can be found in the Discussion section of the report.
VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged
community.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion
Prepared by: Jack Sullivan, Senior Engineering Project Manager
Reviewed by: Debra M. Heiser, Engineering Director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4d) Page 2
Title: Bid Tabulation: Award bid for Connect the Park! Bikeway Project (Project # 4015-2000)
DISCUSSION
BACKGROUND: The Connect the Park! Capital Improvement Program (CIP) was approved by
Council in June of 2013. The plan is to install 32 miles of bikeways in the City. Bikeways are the
general term used for various types of bike facilities that range from a “Share the Road” application
to designated bike lanes.
These improvements were approved by Council in September of 2015. Due to unfavorable fall
bidding prices, staff suggested bidding the project in Spring 2016 to take advantage of a better
bidding climate to get lower bids.
This year’s project will include bike lanes on Texas Avenue, Shelard Parkway, Wayzata Boulevard
and France Avenue. “Share the Road” bike facilities will be installed on Flag Avenue,
Westmoreland Lane and Franklin Avenue. In total, 5 bikeway segments are recommended for
installation. This equates to over 2.9 miles of new “Share the Road” bike facilities and 4.1 miles
of bike lanes. Location maps are below.
Financial Consideration: This project was included in the City’s CIP. Below is a summary of
the costs and funding.
Estimate Low Bid
Construction Cost $156,784.45 $125,760.40
Contingency (10%) $15,678.45 $12,576.04
Engineering & Administration (20%) $34,492.58 $27,667.29
Total $206,955.48 $166,003.73
Funding Sources
General Obligation Bonds $206,955.48 $166,003.73
Construction Timeline:
Should the City Council approve this construction contract the project is expected to be completed
by August of 2016.
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4d) Page 3
Title: Bid Tabulation: Award bid for Connect the Park! Bikeway Project (Project # 4015-2000)
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: May 2, 2016
Consent Agenda Item: 4e
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Adopt 2012 International Property Maintenance Code with Amendments
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to approve second reading and Adopt Ordinance
approving 2012 International Property Maintenance Code (IPMC) with Amendments in Chapter
6 Article V – Property Maintenance Code, Chapter 12 Article II Nuisances and to approve the
summary ordinance for publication.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the proposed property maintenance code address the City
Council’s desire to have well maintained properties in St. Louis Park?
SUMMARY: On April 18, 2016 staff presented to Council the subject ordinance updating the
referenced 2003 edition of the IPMC as amended, to the newer 2012 edition with amendments, as
a basis for the Property Maintenance Code. Also included in the ordinance are proposed
amendments for clarifying and expanding property deficiencies which may be classified as a
nuisance, and abated as necessary in accordance with Chapter 12.
Discussion centered on how the Code is utilized in the various property maintenance programs to
help keep buildings well-maintained, and highlighted amendments necessary to the national model
code for making it effective in the city.
Staff responded to Council inquiries about some of the proposed amendments, including how
residents installing planting beds or accessory structures must be thoughtful on placement to avoid
creating negative drainage effects on adjoining properties, that exterior storage bins for
construction debris currently and will continue to have defined limits of time which they can
remain on a property, and city codes are unable to specifically require upgrades on existing
buildings to new energy codes or standards.
Council approved and set the second reading for May 2, 2016
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Adoption will not impact City staffing or
budget.
VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a well-maintained and
diverse housing stock.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance
Summary for Publication
Prepared by: Ann Boettcher, Inspection Services Manager
Reviewed by: Brian Hoffman, Director of Inspections
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Page 2
Title: Adopt 2012 International Property Maintenance Code with Amendments
ORDINANCE NO._____-16
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE ST. LOUIS PARK ORDINANCE CODE
CHAPTER 6: ARTICLE V – PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE
AND AMENDING CHAPTER 12 DIVISION 1. GENERALLY
AND DIVISION 2. JUNK VEHICLES
THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK DOES ORDAIN:
Section 1. Section 6-142 of the St. Louis Park Code of Ordinances is amended to read
as follows:
Sec. 6-142. Code adopted.
The International Property Maintenance Code, 2012 edition, as published by the International
Code Council is adopted as the property maintenance code of the city, for the control of builds and
structures as provided in this article; and each and all of the regulations, provisions, penalties,
conditions and terms of such code are referred to, adopted and made a part of this article, as if fully
set out in the section, with the additions, insertions, deletions and changes as set forth in section
6-143.
Section 2. Delete Section 6-143 of the St Louis Park Code of Ordinances in its entirety
and replace with the following amendments:
Sec. 6-143. Revisions.
The following sections of the International Property Maintenance Code, 2012 edition, are revised
as follows:
Section 101.1. Title. Amended to read: These regulations shall be known as the Property
Maintenance Code of the City of St. Louis Park, hereinafter referred to as "this code."
Section 102.1. General. Deleted
Section 102.3. Application of other codes. Amended to read: Repairs, additions or alterations to a
structure or changes of occupancy shall be done in accordance with the procedures and provisions
of the Minnesota State Building Code and the City of St. Louis Park Code of Ordinances.
Section 102.7. Referenced codes and standards. Amended to read: All references to other codes
or standards within this Code shall mean the applicable provisions of St. Louis Park Code of
Ordinances or Minnesota State Building Code, whichever is the most restrictive requirement
permitted under statute.
Exception. Delete
Section 102.7.1 Conflicts. Deleted
Section 102.7.2 Provisions in referenced code and standards. Deleted
Section 102.10 Other laws. Deleted
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Page 3
Title: Adopt 2012 International Property Maintenance Code with Amendments
Section 103.2. Appointment. Amended to read: The director of inspections shall be the code
official.
Section 103.5 Fees. Deleted.
Section 104.3 Right of Entry. Amended to read: Where it is necessary to make an inspection to
enforce the provisions of the code, or whenever the code official has reasonable cause to believe
that there exists in a structure or upon a premises a condition in violation of this code, the code
official is authorized to enter the structure or premises at reasonable times to inspect or perform
the duties imposed by this code, provided that if such structure or premises is occupied the code
official shall present credentials to the occupant and request entry. If such structure or premises is
unoccupied, the code official shall first make a reasonable effort to locate the owner or other person
have charge or control of the structure or premises and request entry. If consensual entry is refused
or not obtained, the code official is authorized to pursue recourse as provided by law.
Section 106.3 Prosecution of violation. Amended to read: Any person failing to comply with a
notice of violation or order served in accordance with Section 107 shall be deemed guilty of a
misdemeanor, and the violation shall be deemed a strict liability offense. If the notice of violation
is not complied with, the code official shall institute the appropriate proceeding at law or in equity
to restrain, correct or abate such violation, or to require the removal or termination of the unlawful
occupancy of the structure in violation of the provisions of this code or of the order or direction
made pursuant thereto. Any expenses incurred in carrying out the enforcement of the provisions
of this ordinance shall be included as an assessment for a service against the property by the City
Clerk
Section 107.1 Notice to person responsible. Amended to read: Whenever the code official
determines that there has been a violation of this code or has grounds to believe that a violation
has occurred, notice shall be given to the owner or occupant of the structure. Failure to provide
notice under this section shall not invalidate any proceedings initiated by the City.
Section 107.2 Form. Subsection 5. Deleted.
Section 107.2 Form. Subsection 6. Deleted.
Section 107.6 Transfer of ownership. Deleted.
Section 108.1 General. Amended to read: When a structure or equipment is found by the code
official to be unsafe, or when a structure is found unfit for human occupancy, or is found unlawful,
such structure shall be subject to the provisions of this code.
Section 108.1.5.(7) Amended to read: The building or structure is neglected, damaged, dilapidated,
unsecured or abandoned so as to become an attractive nuisance to children who might play in the
building or structure to their danger, becomes harbor for vagrants, criminals, or enables persons to
resort to the building or structure for committing a nuisance or unlawful act.
Section 108.2 Closing of vacant structures. Amended to read: If the structure is vacant and unfit
for human habitation and occupancy, and is not in danger of structural collapse, the code official
is authorized to post the premises and order the structure closed up so as not to be an attractive
nuisance. Upon failure of the owner to close up the premises within the time specified in the order,
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Page 4
Title: Adopt 2012 International Property Maintenance Code with Amendments
the code official shall cause the premises to be closed and secured through any available public
agency or by contract or arrangement by private persons and the cost thereof shall be assessed to
the real estate upon which the structure is located.
Section 108.3 Notice. Amended to read: Whenever a code official has determined a structure or
equipment is unsafe, a structure is unfit for human occupancy or a structure is unlawful under the
provisions of this section, notice shall be posted in a conspicuous place in or about the structure
affected by such notice and served on the owner or the person occupying the premises. If the
notice pertains to equipment, it shall also be placed on the unsafe equipment.
Section 108.4 Posting. Amended to read: Upon failure of the owner, occupant or persons
responsible to comply with the notice provisions within the time given, the code official shall place
a posting on the premises or on the defective equipment which shall provide a statement of the
penalties for occupying the premises, operating the equipment or removing the posting.
Section 108.4.1Posting removal. Amended to read: The code official shall remove the posting
whenever the defect or defects upon which the enforcement action and posting were based have
been eliminated. Any person who defaces or removes a posting without the approval of the code
official shall be subjected to the penalties provided by this code.
Section 108.5 Prohibited occupancy. Amended to read: Any occupied structure posted by the code
official shall be vacated as ordered by the code official. Any person who shall occupy a posted
premises or shall operate posted equipment, and any owner or person responsible for the premises
who shall let anyone occupy a posted premises or operate posted equipment, shall be liable for the
penalties provided by this code.
Section 109.6. Hearing. Deleted.
Section 110.1 General. Amended to read: The code official shall order the owner of any premises
upon which is located any structure, which in the code official judgement after review is o
deteriorated or dilapidated or has become so out of repair as to be dangerous, unsafe, insanitary or
otherwise unfit for human habitation or occupancy, and such that it is unreasonable to repair the
structure, to demolish and remove such structure; or if such structure is capable of being made safe
by repairs, to repair and make safe and sanitary, or to board up and hold for future repair or to
demolish and remove at the owner’s option.
Section 111.1. Request for appeal hearing. Amended to read: Any person directly affected by a
notice or order issued under this code shall have the right to an appeal hearing when requested in
writing to the city. The hearing shall be held within 20 days of the city receiving a request for
appeal. A request for appeal shall be based on a claim that the true intent of this code or the rules
legally adopted under this code have been incorrectly interpreted, the provisions of this code do
not fully apply or the requirements of this code are adequately satisfied by other means, or that
strict application of any requirement of this code would cause undue hardship.
Section 111.2. Hearing official. Amended to read: The city manager or his/her appointed designee
shall serve as the hearing official for all appeals of this code. The hearing official shall consider
all relevant evidence, documents and verbal presentations submitted during the hearing from the
appeals applicant and the code official. Within ten days following the appeal hearing, the hearing
official shall notify the applicant and code official in writing of the decision.
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Page 5
Title: Adopt 2012 International Property Maintenance Code with Amendments
Section 111.3. Limitations of authority. Amended to read: An application for appeal shall be based
on a claim that the true intent of this code has been incorrectly interpreted or the provisions of this
code do not fully apply. The Hearing Official shall have no authority to waive the requirements
of this code.
Section 111.4. Stays of enforcement. Amended to read: Appeal requests, except for imminent
danger orders or hazardous building notices, shall stay the enforcement of the notice and order
until the hearing official has notified the applicant and code official in writing of a decision on the
appeal.
Section 111.5 Postponed hearing. Delete
Section 111.6 Board decision. Delete
Section 111.7 Court review. Delete
Section 111.8 Stays of enforcement. Delete
Section 112.4 Failure to comply. Delete
Section 202 GENERAL DEFINITIONS – CONDEMN. Deleted.
Section 202 GENERAL DEFINITIONS – ULTIMATE DEFORMATION. Amended to read: The
deformation at which failure occurs and which shall be deemed to occur if the sustainable load
reduces to 80 percent or less of the maximum strength or as determined by a Minnesota Registered
Engineer.
Section 302.2 Grading and Drainage. Amended to read: All premises shall be graded and
maintained to prevent the erosion of soil and to prevent the accumulation of stagnant water thereon,
or within any structure locate thereon. The following is a recommendation for Stormwater Runoff
and Drainage Controls for the Property Maintenance Code shall apply:
a) Adequate Surface drainage:
All properties within the City shall maintain adequate surface drainage in a
manner that does not create a public nuisance, health or safety hazard, or cause
harm to persons or adjacent property due to changes in surface runoff or
settlements due to lack of maintenance.
b) Point Source Discharges:
Gutter downspouts, sump pump discharges, swimming pools, and other point
source discharges shall be directed towards vegetated areas. They shall not be
directed towards existing structures or impervious surfaces in a manner that will
create a safety or health hazard on adjacent properties or create a public
nuisance
c) Construction Storm water management:
If a scope of land disturbance does not require an erosion and sediment control
permit as described in Chapter 12 – Environment, the activity shall adhere to
the City’s erosion and sediment control standards and not discharge sediment
or sediment laden water from the property.
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Page 6
Title: Adopt 2012 International Property Maintenance Code with Amendments
Section 302.3 Sidewalks and Driveways. Amended to read: All sidewalks, walkways, stairs,
driveways, parking spaces and similar areas shall be kept in a proper state of repair, and maintained
free from hazardous conditions such as but not limited to broken pavement, potholes, tripping
hazards and vegetation growth through the parking or sidewalk surfaces.
Section 302.4. Weeds. Amended to read: All premises and exterior property shall be maintained
free from all noxious weeds or turf grass growth in excess of six inches.
Section 302.8. Motor vehicles. Amended to read: Except as otherwise provided in this St. Louis
Park Municipal Code of Ordinances, no junk vehicle, stock car, racing car, inoperative vehicle, or
unlicensed motor vehicle shall be parked, kept or stored on any premises unless within a totally
enclosed structure. No vehicle shall at any time be in a state of major disassembly, disrepair or in
the process of being stripped or dismantled unless totally enclosed. Spray painting of vehicles is
prohibited unless conducted inside an approved spray booth.
Exception.
Any vehicle is permitted to undergo major overhaul, including minor sheet metal or fiberglass
panel repair and finishing, provided that such work is performed inside a structure or similarly
enclosed area designed and approved for such purposes. Automotive maintenance and repair
shall be limited to the owners/occupants who reside at that address.
Section 304.3 Premises identification. Amended by adding new section: Property abutting alleys
shall also have the street address posted so as to be visible from the alley. Address numbers must
be placed on the building nearest the alley and meet the same requirements as for the numbers
facing the primary street frontage.
Section 304.3.1 Multiple dwelling identification. Amended by adding new section to read: All units
and rooms in multiple dwelling buildings, including, but not limited to, homes for the aged, hotels,
motels, lodging houses and boarding houses, apartments and condominiums shall be identified as
separate units by consecutive numbering or lettering which shall be placed on the door in Arabic
numerals or English capital letters, with a minimum size of three inches and a one-half- inch stroke.
Section 304.7 Roofs and Drainage. Amended to read: The roof and flashing shall be maintained
sound, weather-tight, and in good repair. Roofs shall not have defects or deterioration that allow
precipitation to pass. Roof drainage shall be adequate to prevent dampness or deterioration in the
walls or interior portion of the structure. Roof drains, gutters, and downspouts shall be maintained
in good repair and free from obstructions. Roof water shall not be discharged in a manner that
creates a public nuisance. Asphalt shingles that are worn or curled shall be repaired or replaced.
Section 304.13.1. Glazing. Amended to read: Glazing must be maintained, securely held in place,
and free from holes or missing pieces. No jagged or abrasive edges are permitted.
Section 304.13.2. Openable windows. Amended to read: Every window required by this code for
ventilation or egress must be easily openable and capable of being held in place by window
hardware.
Section 304.13.3. Storm Windows. Amended by adding: All openable windows with a single layer
of glass, in rental dwelling units, must be provided with tightfitting storm windows. Storm
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Page 7
Title: Adopt 2012 International Property Maintenance Code with Amendments
windows may be temporarily removed to allow for the installation of screens during periods of
warm weather.
Section 304.14. Insect screens. Amended to read: When insect screens are installed over openings
into any building they must be maintained in good condition, securely held in place, and free from
holes or tears.
Exception. Deleted.
Section 304.14.1. Screens required. Amended by adding new section to read: All openable
windows in rental dwelling units must be provided with tightfitting insect screens of not less than
16 mesh per inch. Insect screens may be temporarily removed to allow for the installation of storm
windows during periods of cold weather.
Section 304.15.1. Landings. Amended by adding new section to read: Exterior doors, other than
storm doors must swing over a floor or landing of at least the width of the door opening, extending
from the threshold for a distance at least equal to the door width, and must not be more than eight
inches below the height of the door threshold.
Section 304.18.1. Doors. Deleted.
Section 305.7. Food preparation. Amended by adding new section to read: All spaces to be
occupied for food preparation purposes shall contain suitable space and equipment to store, prepare
and serve foods in a sanitary manner. There shall be adequate facilities and services for the sanitary
disposal of food wastes and refuse, including facilities for temporary storage.
Section 308.3.1. Garbage facilities. Deleted.
Section 308.4. Construction debris. Amended by adding new section to read: All debris from
construction, remodeling, repair or demolition of a building shall be placed in approved dumpsters
or contained to prevent scattering of any debris from the project site .Dumpsters or contained areas
shall be emptied, cleaned, maintained and free of overfill.
Section 310 Outdoor Storage. Amended by adding new section: Unless specifically permitted by
the Zoning Code Chapter 36, no outdoor storage, personal or business items are permitted. Items
include, but not limited to the following; lawnmowers, snow blowers, lawn/garden equipment,
construction material or equipment.
Exemption – The following items are exempt from the outdoor storage prohibition of this section:
a) Clothesline poles and lines
b) Patio furniture
c) Barbecue grills
d) Ornamental yard enhancements (landscaping, light poles, trellises, benches
designed for exterior use and other permanent improvements designed to enhance
the appearance of the yard).
e) Children’s play equipment
Section 402.1. Habitable spaces. Amended to read: Every habitable space shall have at least one
window facing directly to the outdoors or to a court.
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Page 8
Title: Adopt 2012 International Property Maintenance Code with Amendments
Exception. Where natural light for the room or space is provided from an adjoining room
through an unobstructed opening equal to at least eight percent of the floor area of the
interior room or space.
402.4 Exterior Lighting. Amended by adding new section: Exterior lighting shall be maintained,
operational and free of broken or defective lenses and housing.
Section 403.1. Habitable spaces. Amended to read: Every habitable space shall have at least one
openable window directly to the outdoors or to a court.
Exception. When the room or space is provided with a mechanical ventilation system
capable of supplying conditioned or unconditioned air to, or removing such air from any
space.
Section 403.2. Bathrooms and toilet rooms. Amended by adding exception to read:
Exception. Bathrooms or toilet rooms that contain only a water closet, lavatory or
combination thereof may be ventilated with an approved mechanical recirculating fan
designed to remove odors from the air.
Section 404. Occupancy limitations. Deleted entire section from 404.1 – 404.7.
Section 503.3. Location of employee toilet facilities. Deleted.
Section 505.1. General. Amended to read: Every sink, lavatory, bathtub or shower, drinking
fountain, water closet or other plumbing fixture shall be properly connected to either a public water
system or to an approved private water system. All kitchen sinks, lavatories, laundry facilities,
bathtubs and showers shall be supplied with hot or tempered and cold running water in accordance
with the MN State Plumbing Code.
Section 602.2. Residential occupancies. Amended to read: Dwellings shall be provided with
heating facilities capable of maintaining a room temperature of 68 degrees Fahrenheit in all
habitable rooms, bathrooms and toilet rooms when the outdoor temperature is minus 20 degrees
Fahrenheit or warmer. Cooking appliances shall not be used to provide space heating to meet the
requirements of this section.
Section 602.3. Heat supply. Amended to read: Every owner and operator of any building who rents,
leases or lets one or more dwelling units, rooming units, dormitory or guestroom on terms, either
expressed or implied, shall furnish heat in compliance with section 602.2 to the occupants from
September 1 to June 1.
Exception. When the outdoor temperature is below the winter outdoor design temperature
for the locality, maintenance of the minimum room temperature shall not be required,
provided that the heating system is operating at its full design capacity.
Section 602.4. Occupiable workspaces. Deleted.
Section 603.1.1. Appliance testing. Amended by adding new section to read: Central heating
appliances shall be tested by a licensed mechanical contractor to verify that the appliance is in a
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Page 9
Title: Adopt 2012 International Property Maintenance Code with Amendments
safe working condition when evidence of malfunction, corrosion, deterioration or excessive
interior carbon monoxide is suspected.
Section 603.2. Removal of combustion products. Amended to read: All fuel-burning equipment
and appliances intended for heating shall be connected to an approved chimney or vent to the
exterior of the building.
Exception. Deleted.
Section 605.3. Luminaire locations. Amended by adding: Luminaires are not permitted within or
above shelving space within closets and enclosed storage rooms.
Section 606.1 General. Amended to read: Elevators, dumbwaiters and escalators shall be
maintained in compliance per MN. State Rule Chapter 1307.
Section 702.1 General. Amended to read: A safe, continuous and unobstructed path of travel shall
be provided from any point in a building or structure to the public way. Means of egress shall
comply with the MN State Fire Code.
Section 702.2 Aisles. Amended to read: The required width of aisles in accordance with the MN
State Fire Code shall be unobstructed.
Section 702.3. Locked doors. Amended and adding exception to read: All means of egress doors
shall be readily openable from the side from which egress is to be made without the need of keys,
special knowledge or effort, except where the door hardware conforms to that permitted by the
MN State Building Code.
Exception. Double-keyed deadbolts are permitted in existing single-family residential
dwellings, residential duplexes and individually owned townhomes.
Section 704.1. General. Amended to read: All systems, devices and equipment to detect a fire,
actuate an alarm, or suppress or control a fire or any combination thereof shall be maintained in
an operable condition at all times in accordance with the MN State Fire Code.
Sections 704.2. Amended to read: Smoke Detection and Carbon Monoxide Alarms. All buildings
shall have smoke detectors and carbon monoxide alarms installed and operational in accordance
with Minnesota Statutes 299F.362 and 299F.51.
Sections 704.3 – 704.4. Deleted entire sections
Chapter 8. Referenced standards. Amended to read: All references to other codes or standards
within this code shall mean the applicable provisions of St. Louis Park Code of Ordinances or
Minnesota State Building Code, whichever is the most restrictive requirement permitted under
statute.
Section 3. Section 12-33 of the City Code shall be amended to read as follows:
In addition to those conditions identified elsewhere, the following are declared to be
nuisances affecting health:
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Page 10
Title: Adopt 2012 International Property Maintenance Code with Amendments
(1) All diseased animals running at large.
(2) Carcasses of animals not buried or destroyed or otherwise disposed of within 24
hours after death.
(3) Accumulations of decaying animal or plant material, animal or human feces,
trash, refuse, yard waste, rubbish, garbage, rotting lumber, packing material, scrap
metal, tires or any other substances which can be breeding places for flies,
mosquitoes or vermin, except compost maintained in compliance with chapter 22,
article III.
(4) Privy vaults and garbage cans which are not fly tight.
(5) All noxious weeds and other rank growths of vegetation upon public or private
property.
(6) Dense smoke, noxious fumes, gas and soot, dust or cinders in such quantities as
to render the occupancy of property uncomfortable to a person of ordinary
sensibilities.
(7) All public exposure of persons having a contagious disease.
(8) All other acts, omissions of acts, occupations and uses of property which are a
menace to the public health.
(9) The intentional or negligent discharge of items including but not limited to refuse,
leaves, grass clippings, solvents, antifreeze, oil, gas, fireplace ashes, paint, swimming
pool water or cement rein sate into a street, storm sewer system, or water resource
such as a wetland, creek, pond or lake. This includes illegal discharge or discard of
any item on to any land within the City limits.
(10) Improper sewage disposal to such degree that sewage or effluent is discharging
onto the surface of the ground, backing up into a structure or discharging into a body
of water.
(11) Infestations of flies, fleas, cockroaches, lice, rats, mice, fly larvae or hookworm
larvae.
(12) Breeding grounds not naturally occurring which support mosquito larvae or
mosquitoes carrying West Nile Virus, La Crosse Encephalitis Virus or any other
disease causing microorganism.
(13) Outdoor burners of fuel, including, but not limited to, wood, trash, corn, pellets
and biomass, that are detached from or exterior to a principal building and intended
for use as a water or space heating source are considered to produce excessive smoke
and therefore prohibited.
Section 4. Section 12-34 of the City Code shall be amended to read as follows:
In addition to those conditions identified elsewhere, the following are declared to be
nuisances affecting public peace, welfare and safety:
(1) All limbs of trees, shrubs, bushes, weeds or any other vegetative growth which
are less than eight feet above the surface of any street or sidewalk.
(2) All wires which are strung less than 15 feet above the surface of the ground.
(3) All buildings, walls and other structures which have been damaged by fire, decay
or otherwise, and which are situated as to endanger the safety of the public.
(4) All explosives, inflammable liquids and other dangerous substances stored in any
manner or in any amount other than that provided by ordinance or state or federal
law.
(5) All use or display of fireworks except as provided by ordinance or state or federal
law.
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Page 11
Title: Adopt 2012 International Property Maintenance Code with Amendments
(6) All loud or unusual noises and annoying vibrations which offend the peace and
quiet of persons of ordinary sensibilities or which violate article IV of this chapter.
(7) Obstructions and excavations affecting the ordinary use by the public of streets,
alleys and sidewalks, or public grounds, except under such conditions as are provided
by ordinance.
(8) Radio aerials strung or erected over streets or alleys or attached to poles of public
service companies.
(9) Any use of the public street or sidewalk which causes large crowds of people to
gather, obstructing traffic and the free use of the streets or sidewalks.
(10) All hanging signs, awnings and other similar structures over the streets or
sidewalks, and so situated as to endanger public safety.
(11) All barbed wire fences except for barbed wire on top of non-residential fences,
where barbed wire is at least six (6) feet above grade and at least three (3) feet from
all public sidewalks.
(12) All dangerous, unguarded machinery in any public place, or so situated or
operated on private property as to attract the public.
(13) All other acts, omissions of acts, occupations and uses of property which are a
menace to the safety as determined by the director of inspections.
(14) Feeding of deer, raccoons, wild turkeys, coyotes, opossum, Canada goose or
prohibited animals identified in Section 4-42.
(15) The existence and creation of graffiti. For the purpose of this subsection, the
term "graffiti" shall mean any unauthorized inscription, word, figure, painting,
printing, marks, signs, symbols, figures, designs, inscriptions, or other drawings or
other defacement which are written, marked, etched, scratched, sprayed, drawn,
painted or engraved on or otherwise placed or affixed to any surface of objects such
as buildings, walls, fences, sidewalks, curbs, vehicles, trees, rocks, or other structures
or objects on public and private property or the interior surfaces of those parts of
buildings accessible to the general public and which has the effect of defacing the
property.
(16) The exterior storage of firewood that either:
a. Is infested with rodents, insects or other nuisance animals;
b. Is stacked less than six inches or more than five feet above grade;
c. Exceeds a maximum ground coverage of 64 square feet for each stack;
d. Has stacks on a lot that are within ten feet of each other;
e. Is stacked in a disorderly manner; or
f. Is otherwise a threat to health and safety.
(17) Any condition that interferes with, obstructs, or renders dangerous for passage a
public roadway, highway or right-of-way or waters used by the public.
(18) Any construction materials or equipment left in the open on a residential site
ninety (90) or more days after authorized work has stopped.
(19) Discarded construction material or other litter at a construction site that is not
placed in an adequate waste container or that is allowed to blow around or off the
site.
(20) Any structure that has become dangerous for further use or occupancy because
of structural or sanitary defects or grossly unsanitary conditions.
(21) Principle, accessory and other structures or improvements that have been so
poorly maintained that their physical condition and appearance detract from the
surrounding neighborhood are declared to be public nuisances affecting the general
welfare because they are unsightly, decrease adjoining landowners' and occupants'
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Page 12
Title: Adopt 2012 International Property Maintenance Code with Amendments
enjoyment of their property and neighborhood, and adversely affect property values
and neighborhood patterns. Nuisances include:
a. Exterior walls with holes, breaks or loose or rotting materials, or which are
not maintained as weatherproof and properly surface coated where required
to prevent deterioration
b. Exterior surfaces, including but not limited to, doors, door and window
frames, cornices, porches, trim, balconies, decks or fences not maintained in
good condition. Exterior wood surfaces, other than decay-resistant woods,
not protected from the elements and decay by painting or other protective
covering or treatment. Peeling, flaking or chipped paint. All siding or
masonry joints as well as those between the building envelope and the
perimeter of windows, doors, and skylights not maintained weather resistant
and water tight. All metal surfaces subject to rust or corrosion not coated to
inhibit such rust and corrosion. Surfaces with untreated rust or
corrosion. Oxidation stains.
c. Windows, skylights, doors or frames not kept in sound condition, good
repair or weather tight. Glazing materials with cracks or holes.
d. Exterior doors, door assemblies or hardware not maintained in good
condition. Locks at all entrances to dwelling units, rooming units or
guestrooms which do not tightly secure the door.
e. Cornices, belt courses, corbels, terra cotta trim, wall facings or similar
decorative features not maintained in good repair with proper anchorage or
in a safe condition.
f. Roof drains, gutters or downspouts not maintained in good repair and free
from obstructions. Roof or flashing not sound, tight or having defects that
admit rain. Roof drainage inadequate to prevent dampness or deterioration
in the walls or interior portion of the structure.
g. Chimneys, cooling towers, smoke stacks or similar appurtenances not
maintained as structurally sound, or in good repair. All exposed surfaces of
metal or wood not protected from the elements or against decay or rust by
periodic application of weather-coating materials, such as paint or similar
surface treatment.
h. Foundation walls not maintained plumb or free from open cracks or breaks
or kept in such condition so as to prevent the entry of rodents or other pests.
(22) An unsecured hole or opening caused by improperly abandoned cistern, well pit,
sewage treatment system, unused or non-maintained swimming pool, foundation,
mine shaft or tunnel or any other hole or opening in the ground of sufficient size or
depth to pose a danger to the public or an attractive nuisance.
(23) Accumulations of personal property, rubbish or debris in any residence that
could prevent emergency egress.
(24) Accumulations of animal feces, rubbish or junk remaining in any place as to
become dangerous or injurious to the safety of any individual or to the public.
(25) At single-family and two-family dwelling units, the non-temporary parking or
storage of more than four vehicles, including abandoned, junk and inoperable
vehicles, per unit outside of a garage or on street.
Section 5. Section 12-62 of the City Code shall be amended to read as follows:
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Page 13
Title: Adopt 2012 International Property Maintenance Code with Amendments
No person shall park, keep, place or store, or permit the parking or storage of a stock
car, racing car, junk car or junk car parts on a public street or alley, or on any private lands
or premises which he owns, occupies or controls unless it shall be within a building on such
private premise. Such acts are hereby declared a nuisance under this article.
Section 6. Section 12-63 of the City Code shall be amended to read as follows:
No person shall service, repair, replace parts or do maintenance work on a stock car,
racing car or junk car on a public street nor on any private lands or premises unless it shall
be within a building on such private premises. Such acts are hereby declared a nuisance under
this article.
Section 7. This Ordinance shall take effect not less than fifteen days after its
publication.
Section 8. The City Clerk is instructed to record certified copies of this ordinance in
the Office of the Hennepin County Register of Deeds or Registrar of Titles as the case may be
upon confirmation of the Director of Engineering’s acceptance of relocated water line.
First Reading April 18, 2016
Second Reading May 2, 2016
Date of Publication May 11, 2016
Date Ordinance may take effect May 26, 2016
Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council May 2, 2016
Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor
Attest: Approved as to Form and Execution:
Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Soren Mattick, City Attorney
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Page 14
Title: Adopt 2012 International Property Maintenance Code with Amendments
SUMMARY FOR PUBLICATION
ORDINANCE NO. ____-16
ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE 2012 INTERNATIONAL PROPERTY
MAINTENANCE CODE WITH CITY AMENDMENTS AND AMENDING
CHAPTER 12, ARTICLE II, NUISICANCES
This ordinance adopts the 2012 International Property Maintenance Code (IPMC)
with city amendments and amends Chapter 12, Article II with amendments. Code.
Adopted by the City Council May 2, 2016
Jake Spano /s/
Mayor
A copy of the full text of this ordinance is available for inspection with the City
Clerk.
Published in the St. Louis Park Sailor: May 11, 2016
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: May 2, 2016
Consent Agenda Item: 4f
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Resolution Approving Relocation of Polling Location for Precinct 16 in Ward 4
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution approving relocation of polling place
for Precinct 16 located in Ward 4 from Sabes Jewish Community Center to St. Louis Park Middle
School, 2025 Texas Ave. S.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the Council support the relocation of the polling place for
Precinct 16 to St. Louis Park Middle School, 2025 Texas Ave. S.?
SUMMARY: In early 2016 the City was notified by the administration of Sabes Jewish
Community Center that the facility would not be available for use as a polling place for the 2016
election cycle due to scheduling conflicts. This facility served as the polling place for Precinct 16
since 2012.
MN Statute Section 204B.16 states that polling place changes cannot be made less than 90 days
before the next election, nor anytime between the state primary and state general election. For the
2016 election cycle, the deadline to approve a polling place change is May 11, 2016.
The criteria for evaluating suitable polling place locations is based on the ability of the facility to
accommodate voters in terms of accessibility and whether or not the space is large enough to
accommodate election activities. Additionally, MN Statute Section 204B.16 also requires that the
polling place be located within the precinct or within one mile of the precinct boundary.
Based on this criteria and statutory requirements, designation of St. Louis Park Middle School as
the polling place for Precinct 16 is recommended. The school district has been very supportive of
this change and staff from the Superintendent’s office and the City Clerk’s office have already met
to begin planning and to discuss logistics (parking, traffic, security) for the upcoming election.
City staff will continue to meet regularly with staff from the school district over the coming months
to ensure that election activities run smoothly at all of the school district facilities being used as
polling places.
Staff will use a variety of methods to ensure all registered voters in Precinct 16 are notified of the
change in polling location. Information regarding the new polling location will be published in
the Park Perspective, Sun Sailor newspaper, and on the city website. In addition, all registered
voters in Precinct 16 will be notified of the change by a post card mailed from Hennepin County
at least 25 days before the Primary election.
The ward boundaries, previously established in 2012, will remain unchanged.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution
Prepared by: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk
Reviewed by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Page 2
Title: Resolution Approving Relocation of Polling Location for Precinct 16 in Ward 4
RESOLUTION NO. 16-____
RESOLUTION APPROVING RELOCATION OF POLLING PLACE
FOR PRECINCT 16 LOCATED IN WARD 4 FROM SABES JEWISH COMMUNITY
CENTER TO ST. LOUIS PARK MIDDLE SCHOOL, 2025 TEXAS AVE. S.
WHEREAS, on April 2, 2012, the St. Louis Park City Council adopted Resolution No.
12-060, establishing precinct boundaries and polling places following the 2010 U.S. Census,
Legislative Redistricting; and
WHEREAS, the City was informed that Sabes Jewish Community Center located at 4330
Cedar Lake Road would not be available for use as a polling place for the 2016 election cycle; and
WHEREAS, MN Statute Section 204B.16 states voting locations must be located within
the boundaries of a precinct or within one mile of a boundary, accessible to the handicapped, and
of sufficient size to accommodate all election activities; and
WHEREAS, alternate polling locations have been evaluated and recommended based on
the criteria established and statutory requirements.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the St. Louis Park City Council hereby
designates the following relocated polling place for Ward 4, Precinct 16 for the 2016 Elections
and all future elections:
PRECINCT 16 – St. Louis Park Middle School, 2025 Texas Ave. S.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council May 2, 2016
Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: May 2, 2016
Consent Agenda Item: 4g
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: 2016/2017 Neighborhood Grants
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to approve the 2016/2017 Neighborhood Grants.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: Are the proposed neighborhood activities in keeping with the
Neighborhood Grant Program guidelines?
SUMMARY: Each year grant funding is made available to neighborhood associations to promote
strong neighborhoods and enhance community connections by bringing neighbors together. Grant
applications from 23 neighborhoods were received in March. On April 4th Breanna Freedman
facilitated a grant review process with Grant Review Committee Members Erica Bagstad
(Westwood Hills Neighborhood), Laura Smith (City Staff) and Brian Johnson (Minikahda Oaks
Neighborhood). The Grant Review Committee met to review the grant applications and make
funding recommendations to the City Council. Attached is a worksheet that provides specific detail
on the recommendations made by the Grant Review Committee.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The Grant Review Committee recommends
approval of $38,116 to fund the following 23 neighborhood grants:
$1400 Aquila $2100 Birchwood $2093 Blackstone
$1945 Bronx Park $580 Brooklawns $2100 Brookside
$2000 Browndale $2050 Cedar Manor $1450 Cobblecrest
$1275 Creekside $915 Crestview $1775 Eliot View
$2100 Elmwood $973 Kilmer Pond $1230 Lake Forest
$1650 Lenox $2000 Minikahda Oaks $1400 Minikahda Vista
$2100 Minnehaha $2100 Sorensen $1400 South Oak Hill
$1380 Westwood Hills $2100 Wolfe Park
The Grant Review Committee recommends approval of $1,970 to fund the environmental grant
requests for nineteen neighborhoods.
The Grant Review Committee recommends approval of $6,125 to fund insurance purchases for
thirteen neighborhoods and their proposed activities.
VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged
community.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion
2016 Neighborhood Grant Guidelines
2016 Neighborhood Grant Worksheet
Prepared by: Breanna Freedman, Community Liaison
Reviewed by: John Luse, Chief of Police
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4g) Page 2
Title: 2016/2017 Neighborhood Grants
DISCUSSION
BACKGROUND: Each year grant funding is made available to organized neighborhood
associations to promote strong neighborhoods and enhance community connections by bringing
neighbors together. The City Council appropriated $52,000 in grant funds for the 2016
Neighborhood Grant Program. Of this, $42,000 is allocated for general neighborhood activities,
$2,000 for specific environmental initiatives, and $8,000 for insurance. Because the insurance
component wasn’t being fully utilized in previous years, some of the funds from the insurance
component were reallocated to the general grant fund. Initially, a total of $15,000 was set aside for
insurance requests. This year, $7,000 was moved to the general grant fund, leaving $8,000 for the
insurance component. The increased general fund amount allowed for organized St. Louis Park
neighborhood associations to apply for up to $2,100 annually to support activities, operations and
community building activities and up to $150 for environmental related activities. Note – for 2016
and beyond the City has also set aside $2,000/yr. to provide “seed” money for neighborhoods in
the organizing and formation process. A neighborhood such as this can receive up to $300 for two
or more separate organizing events. The Texa Tonka Neighborhood is currently in the process of
forming.
Neighborhood Associations are responsible for providing insurance when planning neighborhood
events in parks that bring outside equipment into the park such as, but not limited to, moonwalks,
petting zoos, etc. Neighborhood associations can apply for a maximum of $500 in addition to the
standard grant to assist with purchasing insurance.
Grant applications from 23 neighborhoods were received in March. The total grant request for
general neighborhood activities for 2016/2017 was $38,076 ($42,000 budgeted) Fifteen of these
neighborhoods also applied for additional insurance reimbursements and twenty-two
neighborhoods applied for the environmental grant component. The total amount applied for under
the environmental component came in over budget at $2,695; therefore some requests for the
environmental component were moved to the general grant allocation in order to meet the $2,000
environmental fund limit.
In recent years, given a few exceptions, neighborhoods have become more active. Few
neighborhoods have been stagnant or declined in activity and did not apply for much additional
funding than in previous years. Outside of those exceptions, most neighborhoods have been active
and utilize all or a majority of the grant money provided. There were three neighborhoods that
became organized last year that applied for the grant, and one neighborhood that did not reapply
for the grant program for 2016/2017.The Grant Review Committee that met April 4th evaluated
each grant application and made funding recommendations to meet the $42,000 budget for the
general neighborhood grants. The grant applications came in $3,924 under budget, making this
year’s grant review process different from years in the past. Although there was additional funding
available, the Grant Review Committee did not fund projects or activities that did not fall within
the grant guidelines, such as advertisements for garage sales. The 2016 Neighborhood Grant
Guidelines state that garage sales would be given the lowest priority. For 2016/2017 the committee
chose not to fund advertisements for garage sales since this is a revenue generating activity for
participants. This was only applicable to one neighborhood grant application.
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4g) Page 3
Title: 2016/2017 Neighborhood Grants
NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION PROGRAM
2016/2017 GRANT GUIDELINES
Grant Purpose - In 1996, the City of St. Louis Park established this grant program to support
neighborhoods and enhance community connections by bringing neighbors together. Financial
support is provided for special projects initiated by neighbors to address issues, implement ideas
or create opportunities that are meaningful and important to their neighborhoods. This purpose
still applies today and supports the Vision Strategic Direction: St. Louis Park is committed to
being a connected and engaged community.
In 2016/2017, up to $42,000 in grants will be available to organized St. Louis Park neighborhoods
for activities that physically improve the neighborhood, enhance the sense of community within
the neighborhood, support citizen involvement, or develop neighborhood leadership.
Environmental Grant - An additional $2,000 in grants will be available to neighborhoods
that incorporate an environmental component either in conjunction with an existing event or
adding a new program/event. This new grant element ties to the Vision Strategic Direction: St.
Louis Park is committed to being a leader in environmental stewardship. We will increase
environmental consciousness and responsibility in all areas of city business.
Money is also available for neighborhood associations seeking additional insurance for
neighborhood activities. More information is available on page 3 under “Funding for Insurance”.
Eligible Activities - Examples of eligible uses for grant funds are: newsletters, meetings,
postage, picnics, parties, youth or senior programs, new neighbor welcome, hayrides, ice cream
socials, children’s parades, entrance signs, flower plantings, park improvements or community
gardens. However, neighborhoods are not limited to these examples. Residents are encouraged
to be creative in assessing their needs and determining the projects they want to undertake as a
neighborhood. Neighborhood leaders are required to include neighborhood resident input for
proposed projects. How you choose to receive this input must be included in the grant
application.
A few examples of eligible expenses for the environmental component are: purchasing
environmentally friendly products for a neighborhood event, hosting an earth day or buckthorn
removal event, and working with our Parks & Rec department to add plants or recycling containers
to a park.
Eligible Applicants - In order to be eligible for the Neighborhood Grants, you MUST be
recognized as a neighborhood association. To be recognized as a neighborhood association, you
must demonstrate and document that your neighborhood association meets the following
requirements:
1. Must have at least three elected officers from the neighborhood
2. Have a method of transferring leadership from one year to the next
3. Written bylaws approved by its membership, which must be reviewed annually
4. Must hold an annual neighborhood meeting
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4g) Page 4
Title: 2016/2017 Neighborhood Grants
Matching Grant Funds - To qualify for a grant, a neighborhood must demonstrate how it
will contribute to or leverage the Neighborhood Revitalization grant funds. A match of
neighborhood resources maximizes the use of limited City funds and confirms the commitment
from each neighborhood. Neighborhoods should provide a 100% (dollar for dollar) match to the
grant amount. Any combination of sources is acceptable in calculating the neighborhood match.
These can be in the form of:
Cash raised through fundraising Fees collected at activities
Donations from businesses, civic groups, etc. In-kind services or sweat equity
Innovative Projects - The neighborhood activity cannot duplicate a service already in place.
Improvements to Private Property - Neighborhoods should be aware that legal issues
limit the use of City funds to improve private property. Applicants should be able to clearly
demonstrate a strong public purpose for funds proposed to improve private property in any way.
Improvements to Public Land or Parks - Physical improvements to any public property
must be coordinated with the appropriate City department. It should not conflict with or duplicate
a project in the City’s Capital Improvements Program. A letter of feasibility must be included
with a grant application that requests funding for park improvements. This letter should confirm
that the appropriate City department has reviewed the proposed improvements, that the proposal
is feasible, and that the project budget is a reasonable estimate of project costs.
City department contact for capital improvements:
Rick Beane, Parks and Recreation Department, 952-928-2854
Old Grants - Neighborhoods with a previous grant must close out their account before new
grant funds are awarded. The deadline to close out 2015 grants is April 30, 2016. Neighborhoods
that received a lump sum advance amount for a 2015 grant must turn in all outstanding receipts or
reimburse the city for funds not used.
2016/2017 Grant Deadlines - 2016/17 grants will run from May 1, 2016 to April 30, 2017.
All receipts for expenses incurred in 2016 should be turned in by January 31, 2017. All 2017
receipts are due by May 1, 2017.
Funding Priorities - Up to $42,000 is available for grants to neighborhoods in this funding
cycle, with an additional $2,000 available for environmental components. However, with 25
organized neighborhoods eligible for funds, the process is competitive. Neighborhood leaders are
advised to request funds for their most important needs. During the grant review process, greater
consideration will be given to proposals that enhance community connections and show a greater
match amount. Lesser consideration will be given to proposals for park improvements and
proposals that show a large expenditure for a single activity. Garage sales will be given the lowest
priority. If grant requests exceed the amount available for funding, garage sales will not be funded.
Funding for Insurance - When planning neighborhood events in parks, you may be required
to make provisions to use your own insurance. Neighborhood Associations are responsible for
providing outside insurance when planning neighborhood events in parks that bring outside
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4g) Page 5
Title: 2016/2017 Neighborhood Grants
equipment into the park such as, but not limited to moonwalks, petting zoos, etc. Without clear
delineation of who is responsible in case of accidents, neighborhood leaders may be held liable.
To assist neighborhood associations with purchasing additional insurance, you can apply for a
maximum of $500 per neighborhood in addition to the standard grant request. This money is
strictly for insurance and cannot be used for any other reimbursement.
Award Limits
Group activities, social events and meetings are considered for funding up to a maximum of
$800 per activity.
There is a $2100 grant award limit per neighborhood for all requests. Any neighborhood
requesting more than $1500 is advised to include priority preferences on their application.
Neighborhoods can apply for up to $150 for environmental projects.
$500 per neighborhood is available for the purchase of insurance.
Grant Process Steps
1. Apply - Applications must be received by 4:30 p.m. on Friday, March 25, 2016. They may
be mailed or hand-delivered to Breanna Freedman, Community Liaison, City of St. Louis
Park, 3015 Raleigh Ave. South, St. Louis Park, MN 55416. Grants may also be submitted by
email to bfreedman@stlouispark.org or faxed to 952-924-2676. Any applications received
after the deadline will not be eligible to receive a grant. Please email Breanna if you would
like to receive an electronic grant application.
2. Review Time - City staff and a committee of volunteer neighborhood leaders will review the
grant proposals and make recommendations for approval to the City Manager.
3. Final Approval - Final authorization of the awards will be approved at a City Council
Meeting late April or early May.
4. Signed Agreements - Within two weeks of approval, each recipient neighborhood will
receive a grant agreement from the City. The agreement must be signed and returned prior to
any funds being released.
Pre-application Assistance - All applicants are strongly encouraged to talk to city staff as
they work to identify projects and put together their applications. This will help to ensure complete
and accurate applications, as well as streamline application review.
Electronic Application - Contact Breanna Freedman at bfreedman@stlouispark.org or 952-
924-2184 if you would like an electronic application (Microsoft Excel) emailed to you.
Questions?
Contact Breanna Freedman, Community Liaison
(952) 924-2184 or bfreedman@stlouispark.org
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4g) Page 6
Title: 2016/2017 Neighborhood Grants
Grant Committee
Worksheet
2016 Neighborhood Grant Request
Grant Review Committee Meeting, Monday, April 4th at 5:30 p.m. in the Dakota Room of City Hall
The Grant Review Committee reviewed the 23 neighborhood grant applications from the eligible
neighborhood associations.
Requests Totaled: $38,076 Total Amount Recommended: $38,116
- Insurance Requests came in under budget
- Environmental Requests came in over budget
Requested
Amount
Recommended
Amount
$1,400 Aquila $1,400
$500 Picnic/Annual Meeting
$700 Postage/Newsletter
$100 Fall Event
$100 Plant Exchange
$75 Insurance Request $75
$120 Trail Clean Up $120
$2,100 Birchwood $2,100
$550 Ice Cream Social/Summer Party
$200 Newsletter
$600 Winter Party
$500 Movie Night
$250 Fun Run/Walk
$500 Insurance Request $500
$150 Compostable Products $150
$2,093 Blackstone $2,093
$318 Porta Potty
$160 Blackstone Park Lawn & Trees
$170 2016 Kick Off Party
$170 Summer Gathering
$175 Ice Cream Float Social
$550 National Night Out
$260 Pizza Night
$160 Election/Winter Gathering
$130 Operating Support
$150 Insurance Request $150
$150 Flowers for Blackstone Park $150
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4g) Page 7
Title: 2016/2017 Neighborhood Grants
Requested
Amount
Recommended
Amount
$1,855 Bronx Park $1,945
$700 Annual Neighborhood Picnic Cut $65 for prizes at
general meetings,
moved the reusable
signs of the
environmental
component into the
general fund
$595 Social Activities
$200 Neighborhood Newsletter
$200 Community Fire Pit Night
$160
General Meeting Expenses
$500 Insurance Request $500
$150 Reusable Signs $0
$580 Brooklawns $580
$260 Summer Get-Together Cut environmental
component: not
clear on what funds
would be used for
$300 Kid's Halloween Party
$20 Egg Hunt
$50 Spruce tops $0
$2,100 Brookside $2,100
$600 National Night Out
$250 Annual Meeting
$250 Movie Nights at Jackley Park
$150 Patriotic Bike Parade
$100 Skating Parties at Jackley Park
$100 Welcome Baskets
$100 Halloween Party
$200 Neighborhood Socials
$200 Ice Cream Social
$150
Porta Potty at Jackley (shared with
Creekside)
$200 Insurance Request $200
$100 Weed and Clean up Noise Wall $100
$2,000 Browndale $2,000
$200 Browndale Goes
$400 Fall Bonfire & Bluegrass
$500 Family Camp Outs
$100 Winterfest
$150 Spring Egg Hunt
$525
Browndale 20 Year Anniversary
Celebration
$125 July 4th Kiddie Parade
$500 Insurance Request $500
$100 Earth Day Clean Up $100
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4g) Page 8
Title: 2016/2017 Neighborhood Grants
Requested
Amount
Recommended
Amount
$1,900 Cedar Manor $2,050
$100 Annual Meeting
Moved reusable
signs from
environmental
component to
general fund
$220 Movie night in the park
$550 Cedar Manor Fall Gathering
$315 Halloween Party
$200
Progressive Dinner & Block Captain
Information
$100 Sledding at Cedar Manor Park
$275 Portable Toilet for Cedar Manor Park
$140 Fall Clean Up
$150 Reusable Signs for events $0
$1,300 Cobblecrest $1,450
$800 Hayride/Family Day at Aquila Moved environmental
component into general
fund $500
National Night Out & Neighborhood
Gatherings
$500 Insurance Request $500
$150 Compostable Products $0
$1,200 Creekside $1,275
$25 Plant Sale Cut $25 from plant
sale designated for
signage, moved $75
from environmental
component to
general fund as an
option to purchase
reusable signs
instead of printing
flyers
$590 Block party
$220
Porta Potty at Jackley (shared with
Brookside)
$80 Butterfly Garden
$190 Winter Solstice
$75 Flower planted at Excelsior and Colorado
$75 Reusable Signs
$20 National Night Out
$150 Creekside Cleanup $75
$500 Insurance Request $500
$915 Crestview $915
$400 Movie Night
$515 Tent for Picnic/Rental
$50 Compostable Products $50
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4g) Page 9
Title: 2016/2017 Neighborhood Grants
Requested
Amount
Recommended
Amount
$1,650 Eliot View $1,775
$600 Annual Picnic & Election Cut $25 from garden
party for prizes, moved
Garden Party from
environmental
component to general
fund
$500 Youth Activity/Fitness
$125 Garden Party
$550 2 Plastic signs for neighborhood Events
$150 Garden Party $0
$2,100 Elmwood $2,100
$650 Summer Picnic
$400
Kids Halloween and Pumpkin Carving
Party
$400 Bowling Party
$50 Annual Meeting
$600 Porta Potty at Central
$150 Porta Potty Rental $150
$500 Insurance $500
$1,023 Kilmer Pond $973
$690 Halloween Hayride Cut $50 from garage
sale for
advertisements in
newspapers
$100 National Night Out
$48 Ice Cream Social
$19 Ice-Golf Pond Challenge
$166 Kilmer Pond Garage Sale
$20 Earth Day Clean Up $20
$500 Insurance $500
$1,230 Lake Forest $1,230
$600 Neighborhood Annual Summer Party
$250 National Night Out Block parties
$30 General Association Supplies
$200
Neighborhood Fence and sign
maintenance
$150 Neighborhood Garden Upkeep
$30 Compostable Products $30
$1,650 Lenox $1,650
$600 Neighborhood Newsletter
$400 Bike Parade
$450 Bowling Event at Park Tavern
$200 Fall/Halloween Pumpkin Carving Event
$150 Compostable Products $150
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4g) Page 10
Title: 2016/2017 Neighborhood Grants
Requested
Amount
Recommended
Amount
$1,400 Minikahda Vista $1,400
$200 Annual Meeting
$300 Summer Potluck
$900 National Night Out
$300 Insurance Request $300
$125
Plant Swap w/ Browndale
Neighborhood $125
$2,500 Minnehaha $2,100
$700 National Night Out
Cut $100 from each
activity to meet grant
maximum
$500 Children's Play Time
$700 Little Free Library
$400 Sledding Party
$200 Halloween Party
$150 Neighborhood Clean Up $150
$2,100 Sorensen $2,100
$750 Neighborhood Newsletters
$595 Annual Fall Social
$265 Annual Sorensen Business Meeting
$240 Webster Park Porta Potty
$250 Wine and Cheese Fundraiser
$150
Bee/Pollinator Friendly Garden at
Webster Park $150
$1,500 South Oak Hill $1,400
$700 Neighborhood BBQ and Potluck
Cut $100 from BBQ
for raffle prizes
$300 Neighborhood Meetings
$250 Summer Ice Cream Social
$250 Neighborhood Happy Hours
$500 Insurance Request $500
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4g) Page 11
Title: 2016/2017 Neighborhood Grants
Requested
Amount
Recommended
Amount
$1,380 Westwood Hills $1,380
$100 Ladies Night Out
$200 Spring Ice Cream Social
$280 Neighborhood Movie Night
$100 Guys Night Out
$700 Fall party
$500 Insurance Request $500
$150 Neighborhood Native Plants $150
$2,100 Wolfe Park $2,100
$100 Reusable Sandwich Boards
$360
National Night Out at Steel Toe Brewery
(no reimbursement for alcohol)
$250 Movie in Wolfe Park
$50
Neighborhood Firepit w/ Birchwood
Neighborhood
$320 Bass Lake Clean Up with Brunch
$335 Blankets for Humane Society Cats
$135 Bagels and Coffee in Wolfe Park
$550
Annual Neighborhood Association
Meeting
$400 Insurance Request $400
$150 Reusable Sandwich Boards $150
$38,076 Total Requested by All Neighborhoods $38,116
$6,125 Total Insurance Request $6,125
$2,695 Total Environmental Request $1,970
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: May 2, 2016
Consent Agenda Item: 4h
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Third Amendment to Central Park West Redevelopment Contract
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution approving the Third Amendment to
the Contract for Private Redevelopment with Central Park West, LLC.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council support modifying the required
commencement and completion dates of the apartment and office buildings as specified in the
Third Amendment to the Contract for Private Redevelopment with Central Park West, LLC?
SUMMARY: In light of unavoidable delays due to utility work and market demand for office
space, the Redevelopers responsible for constructing Central Park West Phases I, II, IV, and V
have requested that the required project commencement and completion dates for their respective
phases be modified as follows:
PROPOSED REVISED CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The proposed contract extensions reflect the
current construction and economic realities related to the various phases of the Central Park West
redevelopment. The construction delay means that the original Redeveloper’s (Duke Realty)
reimbursement of TIF-eligible expenses related to the Central Park West portion of the overall
West End project will likewise be delayed. Once the subject properties are redeveloped and fully
assessed, Duke’s TIF payments will increase.
VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion
Resolution
Proposed Third Amendment
Prepared by: Greg Hunt, Economic Development Coordinator
Reviewed by: Kevin Locke, Community Development Director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, EDA Executive Director, and City Manager
Central Park West
Phase
Required
Commencement
Date
Revised
Commencement
Date
(Proposed)
Required
Completion
Date
Revised
Completion
Date
(Proposed)
Phase I
(apartment building #1)
June 1, 2015 November 28,
2015
December 31,
2016
June 30,
2017
Phase II
(apartment building #2)
April 1, 2016 October 2,
2017
August 31,
2017
March 4,
2019
Phase III
(hotel)
April 1, 2016 No Change August 31,
2017
No Change
Phase IV
(office building #1)
April 1, 2016 April 1,
2017
September 30,
2017
September 30,
2018
Phase V
(office building #2)
April 1, 2019 April 1,
2020
September 30,
2020
September 30,
2021
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4h) Page 2
Title: Third Amendment to Central Park West Redevelopment Contract
DISCUSSION
The EDA and City adopted a Second Amendment to the Contract for Private Redevelopment with
Central Park West, LLC, on December 15, 2014 related to the Central Park West redevelopment
located at the SW quadrant of I-394 and Highway 100. Responsibility for constructing project
Phases I & II (a 199-unit apartment building and 164-unit apartment building) were retained by
Central Park West, LLC (an affiliate of DLC Residential). Responsibility for constructing Phase
III (hotel) was subsequently assigned to RISLP, LLC (an affiliate of TPI Hospitality).
Responsibility for constructing project Phases IV and V (one 353,353 SF Class A multi-story
office building per phase) was subsequently assigned to OP4 SLP, LLC (an affiliate of The
Excelsior Group).
Under the Second Amendment, the Required Construction Commencement and Completion Dates
for the various project phases (subject to unavoidable delays) were established as follows:
Phase
Required
Commencement
Date
Required
Completion
Date
Central Park West Phase I
(multi-family housing)
June 1, 2015 December 31, 2016
Central Park West Phase II
(multi-family housing)
April 1, 2016 August 31, 2017
Central Park West Phase III
(hotel)
April 1, 2016 August 31, 2017
Central Park West Phase IV
(office)
April 1, 2016 September 30, 2017
Central Park West Phase V
(office)
April 1, 2019 September 30, 2020
Central Park West Phase VI
(future redevelopment)
TBD TBD
If the Redeveloper anticipated that the timetable for any Phase would not be met, the Redeveloper
was to provide a report to the City describing the reasons for the expected failure to meet the schedule,
evidence of Redeveloper’s due diligence in working toward construction of the relevant Phase, and a
detailed revised schedule.
Staff has received a report from Central Park West, LLC indicating that it began construction on
the first apartment building later than planned due to the Met Council sanitary sewer work at the
south end of the Central Park West site. The Met Council work then delayed the required utility
work on Utica Avenue (adjacent to the Phase I site) which included location of a temporary
sanitary line through the center of the project site. Central Park West, LLC couldn’t commence
construction of the first apartment building until the sanitary line was relocated out of the building
footprint. As a result, it was unable to begin construction on Phase I until late November rather
than in June as required. This unavoidable delay will push back the completion date of Phase I and
consequently commencement of Phase II. The Redeveloper has therefore requested that the
completion date for Phase I be extended until June 30, 2017. In light of this schedule revision, the
Central Park West, LLC has also requested that the commencement date for the Phase II apartment
building be extended until October 2, 2017 and its completion date be extended until March 4,
2019.
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4h) Page 3
Title: Third Amendment to Central Park West Redevelopment Contract
The Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) for the Phase III hotel (a six story,
126-room AC Hotel by Marriott) was approved by the City Council on April 4th. TPI Hospitality
expects to break ground shortly and complete the project by late summer next year as required so
no revision for the construction schedule for Phase III is necessary.
Staff has also received a report from The Excelsior Group expressing that demand in the local
office market required a cautious approach before it could commit to constructing a speculative
office building in the area. However, now that economic conditions have improved, it has begun
preparing plans for the Phase IV office building and is currently pursuing project financing. The
315,000 square Class A office building, called Ten West End, will be the first multitenant office
building constructed along the Interstate 394 corridor in more than 16 years. The Redeveloper and
its project partner, Ryan Companies, are scheduled to discuss initial concept plans at the May 9 th
Study Session and hold a neighborhood meeting May 11th. The partners then expect to make formal
plan submittals during the summer, obtain plan approvals in fall/early winter and commence
construction in spring 2017. The Redeveloper has therefore requested that the commencement and
completion dates for Phase IV be extended until April 1, 2017 and September 30, 2018
respectively. In allowance for a reasonable building lease-up period, The Excelsior Group has also
requested that the commencement date for the subsequent Phase V office building be extended
until April 1, 2020 and its completion date be extended to September 30, 2021.
Thus, it is proposed that the Central Park West Redevelopers commence construction of Phases I, II,
IV, and V by the Required Commencement Dates, and substantially complete them by the Required
Completion Dates, subject to unavoidable delays, all according to the revised construction schedule
as follows:
REVISED CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE
The Redevelopers have therefore requested a Third Amendment to the Central Park West
Redevelopment Contract reflecting the above revised Construction Schedule (attached).
Central Park West
Phase
Required
Commencement
Date
Revised
Commencement
Date
(Proposed)
Required
Completion
Date
Revised
Completion
Date
(Proposed)
Phase I
(apartment building #1)
June 1, 2015 November 28,
2015
December 31,
2016
June 30,
2017
Phase II
(apartment building #2)
April 1, 2016 October 2,
2017
August 31,
2017
March 4,
2019
Phase III
(hotel)
April 1, 2016 No Change August 31,
2017
No Change
Phase IV
(office building #1)
April 1, 2016 April 1,
2017
September 30,
2017
September 30,
2018
Phase V
(office building #2)
April 1, 2019 April 1,
2020
September 30,
2020
September 30,
2021
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4h) Page 4
Title: Third Amendment to Central Park West Redevelopment Contract
CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK
RESOLUTION NO. 16-____
RESOLUTION APPROVING A THIRD AMENDMENT TO
AMENDED AND RESTATED CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE REDEVELOPMENT
AMONG THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK, THE ST. LOUIS PARK
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CENTRAL PARK WEST, LLC
AND RELATED REDEVELOPER ENTITIES
BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council ("Council") of the City of St. Louis Park ("City")
as follows:
Section 1. Recitals.
1.01. The St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority (the “Authority”) is currently
administering its Redevelopment Project No. 1 ("Project") pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections
469.001 to 469.047 ("HRA Act"), and within the Project has established The West End Tax Increment
Financing District (“TIF District”).
1.02. The Authority, the City, and Duke Realty Limited Partnership (“Duke”) entered into an
Amended and Restated Contract for Private Redevelopment dated as of May 17, 2010, regarding
redevelopment of a portion of the property within the TIF District, and entered into a First
Amendment thereto dated as of November 21, 2011 (as so amended, the “Contract”).
1.03. Duke assigned its obligations under the Contract to Central Park West, LLC (“CPW”),
and CPW has assigned certain of its obligations under the Contract to Millenium Phase II, LLC, OP4
SLP, LLC, and RISLP, LLC, all pursuant to various Assignment and Assumption instruments
approved by the City (such entities collectively the “Redeveloper Entities”).
1.04. The parties to the Contract have determined to a need to revise the Contract in certain
respects, and to that end have prepared a Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Contract for
Private Redevelopment (the “Third Amendment”), by and among the Authority, the City, and the
Redeveloper Entities.
1.05. The Council has reviewed the Third Amendment and finds that the approval and
execution thereof and performance of the City’s obligations thereunder are in the best interest of the
City and its residents.
Section 2. City Approval; Other Proceedings.
2.01. The Third Amendment as presented to the Council is hereby in all respects approved,
subject to modifications that do not alter the substance of the transaction and that are approved by the
Mayor and City Manager, provided that execution of the documents by such officials shall be
conclusive evidence of approval.
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4h) Page 5
Title: Third Amendment to Central Park West Redevelopment Contract
2.02. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute on behalf of the City
the Third Amendment and any documents referenced therein requiring execution by the City, and to
carry out, on behalf of the City, its obligations thereunder.
2.03. City staff and consultants are authorized to take any actions necessary to carry out the
intent of this resolution.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council May 2, 2016
Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4h) Page 6
Title: Third Amendment to Central Park West Redevelopment Contract
THIRD AMENDMENT TO
AMENDED AND RESTATED CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE REDEVELOPMENT
This Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Contract for Private Redevelopment
(“Amendment”), dated as of May 2, 2016, by and between the CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK, a
Minnesota municipal corporation (the “City”), ST. LOUIS PARK ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, a public body corporate and politic under the laws of the State
of Minnesota (the “Authority”), CENTRAL PARK WEST, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability
company (“CPW”), MILLENNIUM PHASE II, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company
(“Millennium Phase II”), OP4 SLP, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (“OP4”), and
RISLP, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (“RISLP” and, together with CPW,
Millennium, and OP4, as their interests appear, the “Redeveloper”);
WITNESSETH:
A. The Authority currently administers Redevelopment Project No. 1 (the
“Redevelopment Project”) and the West End Tax Increment Financing District within the
Redevelopment Project (the “TIF District”), pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to
469.047 (the “HRA Act”) and Sections 469.174 to 469.1799, as amended (the “TIF Act”).
B. The Authority, the City, and Duke Realty Limited Partnership (“Duke”) entered into
an Amended and Restated Contract for Private Redevelopment dated May 17, 2010, recorded as
Document No. 4781478, amended by a First Amendment thereto dated November 21, 2011 recorded
as Document No. 4913709 (as so amended, the “Contract”), which described the parties’ respective
responsibilities regarding redevelopment of certain property in the TIF District (referred to as the
“Redevelopment Property”).
C. On September 11, 2013, Duke assigned its interests in the Contract as to a portion of
the Redevelopment Property described as Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 2, Block 1, The Shops at West End
to Millennium at West End, LLC (“Millenium”), pursuant to an Assignment and Assumption of
Redevelopment Contract, recorded in the office of the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles as
Document No. T05115015. A certificate of completion has been issued for Lot 1, Block 1, The Shops
at West End, described below as Phase IIC (multifamily).
D. Millennium has subsequently assigned its interests in the Contract as to Lot 2, Block
1, The Shops at West End (the “Olive Garden Property”) to Millennium Phase II, an Affiliate (as
such term is defined in the Contract), pursuant to an Assignment and Assumption of Redevelopment
Contract dated as of April __, 2016. The Olive Garden Property is described below as Central Park
West Phase VI.
E. On May 8, 2015, Duke assigned its interests in the Contract to CPW pursuant to an
Assignment and Assumption of Redevelopment Contract, recorded in the office of the Hennepin
County Registrar of Titles as Documents No. T05254066 and T05258753, and simultaneously
therewith, the City, the Authority, Duke, and CPW entered into a Second Amendment to Amended
and Restated Contract for Private Redevelopment, recorded in the office of the Hennepin County
Registrar of Titles as Document No. T05254067 (the “Amended Contract”), relating to the Olive
Garden Property and the portion of the Redevelopment Property described as Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block
1 and Outlot A, Central Park West P.U.D. No. 121.
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4h) Page 7
Title: Third Amendment to Central Park West Redevelopment Contract
F. Millennium was inadvertently excluded as a party to the Amended Contract, but
Millennium Phase II, as assignee of Millennium and as the owner of the Olive Garden Property and
Redeveloper of Central Park West Phase VI, agrees and acknowledges that it is subject to the
Amended Contract and to this Third Amendment.
G. In accordance with the Amended Contract, and pursuant to separate Assignment and
Assumptions of Redevelopment Contract, both dated as of May 8, 2015 and recorded in the office of
the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles as Documents No. T05254076 and T05254079, CPW has
assigned (i) to OP4, CPW’s rights in and obligations under the Amended Contract with respect to
Central Park West Phase IV and Central Park West Phase V, which phases relate to the portion of the
Redevelopment Property described as Outlot A, Central Park West P.U.D. No. 121, and (ii) to RISLP,
CPW’s rights in and obligations under the Amended Contract with respect to Central Park West Phase
III, which phase relates to the portion of the Redevelopment Property described as Lot 3, Block 1,
Central Park West P.U.D. No. 121.
H. Due to unavoidable delays in the construction of certain of the Phases of the
Minimum Improvements, the parties have now agreed to modify certain terms and conditions of
the Amended Contract as set forth below.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual obligations of the
parties hereto, each of them does hereby covenant and agree with the other as follows:
1. Amendment to Schedule G of the Contract. Schedule G of the Contract is amended
as follows:
CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE
Phase Required
Commencement Date
Required Completion
Date
Phase I
(Demolition and 16 St.)
December 18, 2007 August 1, 2009*
Phase IIA
(Retail and office; West End Blvd.)
July 1, 2008 June 1, 2010**
Phase IIC (multifamily housing) March 1, 2014 December 31, 2016***
Central Park West Phase I
(multifamily housing)
November 28, 2015 June 30, 2017
Central Park West Phase II
(multifamily housing)
October 2, 2017 March 4, 2019
Central Park West Phase III (hotel) April 1, 2016 August 31, 2017
Central Park West Phase IV (office) April 1, 2017 September 30, 2018
Central Park West Phase V (office) April 1, 2020 September 30, 2021
Central Park West Phase VI (TBD) TBD TBD
*Phase I is complete and a Certificate of Completion has been delivered for this Phase.
**Phase IIA is complete and a Certificate of Completion has been delivered for this Phase.
***Phase IIC is complete and a Certificate of Completion has been delivered for this Phase.
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4h) Page 8
Title: Third Amendment to Central Park West Redevelopment Contract
2. Miscellaneous. Except as amended by this Amendment, the Amended Contract
shall remain in full force and effect. Upon execution, Redeveloper shall reimburse the Authority
for all out-of pocket-costs incurred by the Authority in connection with negotiating, drafting and
approval of this Amendment. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts,
all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
(The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.)
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4h) Page 9
Title: Third Amendment to Central Park West Redevelopment Contract
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City, the Authority and the Redeveloper have caused this
Amendment to be duly executed by their duly authorized representatives.
CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK
By
Its Mayor
By
Its City Manager
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) SS.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of _________, 2016,
by Jacob Spano and Tom Harmening, the Mayor and City Manager of the City of St. Louis Park,
a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the City.
Notary Public
ST. LOUIS PARK ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
By
Its President
By
Its Executive Director
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) SS.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of _________, 2016,
by Anne Mavity and Tom Harmening, the President and Executive Director of the St. Louis Park
Economic Development Authority, a public body corporate and politic under the laws of the State
of Minnesota, on behalf of the Authority.
Notary Public
(City and Authority Signature Page to Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Contract)
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4h) Page 10
Title: Third Amendment to Central Park West Redevelopment Contract
CENTRAL PARK WEST, LLC
By _________________________
Its Managing Member
STATE OF FLORIDA )
) SS.
COUNTY OF _______ )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of _________, 2016,
by Ruslan Krivoruchko, the Managing Member of Central Park West, LLC, a Minnesota limited
liability company, on behalf of the company.
Notary Public
OP4 SLP, LLC
By
Its _______________________
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) SS.
COUNTY OF _______ )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of _________, 2016,
by _________________, the _________________ of OP4 SLP, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability
company, on behalf of the company.
Notary Public
(Redeveloper Signature Page to Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Contract)
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4h) Page 11
Title: Third Amendment to Central Park West Redevelopment Contract
MILLENNIUM PHASE II, LLC
By _________________________________
Its Managing Member
STATE OF FLORIDA )
) SS.
COUNTY OF __________ )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of _________, 2016,
by Ruslan Krivoruchko, the Managing Member of Millennium Phase II, LLC, a Minnesota limited
liability company, on behalf of the company.
Notary Public
RISLP, LLC
By
Its _______________________
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) SS.
COUNTY OF __________ )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of _________, 2016,
by ________________, the __________________ of RISLP, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability
company, on behalf of the company.
Notary Public
(Redeveloper Signature Page to Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Contract)
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: May 2, 2016
Consent Agenda Item: 4i
OFFICIAL MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
MARCH 16, 2016 – 6:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MEMBERS PRESENT: Torrey Kanne, Claudia Johnston-Madison,
Lisa Peilen, Richard Person, Carl Robertson,
MEMBERS ABSENT: Lynne Carper, Joe Tatalovich
Ethan Rickert (youth member)
STAFF PRESENT: Sean Walther, Debra Heiser, Greg Hunt
1. Call to Order – Roll Call
2. Approval of Minutes of February 17, 2016 and March 2, 2016
Commissioner Person moved approval of the minutes of February 17, 2016.
Commissioner Peilen seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 3-2
(Kanne and Robertson abstained). Commissioner Robertson moved approval of the
minutes of March 2, 2016. Commissioner Person seconded the motion, and the motion
passed on a vote of 4-1 (Peilen abstained).
3. Public Hearings
A. Excelsior & Monterey (Bridgewater Dominium Addition)
Preliminary Plat with Variances and
Preliminary Planned Unit Development
Location: 4400, 4424 Excelsior Blvd.; 3743 Monterey Dr.
Applicant: St. Louis Park Leased Housing Associates I, LLC
Case Nos.: 15-32-S, 15-33-PUD, 15-46-VAR
Sean Walter, Planning and Zoning Administrator, presented the staff report. He reviewed
the request for preliminary plat with variances. The preliminary plat combines three
existing parcels to be created into two new parcels and dedicates right-of-way to
surrounding streets where road easements currently exist. He explained that the variances
regard drainage and utility easement width reduction.
Mr. Walther presented the Planned Unit Development analysis including zoning,
building/site design, shadow study, parking, access, landscaping, and Designed Outdoor
Recreation Area (DORA).
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4i) Page 2
Title: Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of March 16, 2016
Mr. Walther discussed the traffic study in detail. The study incorporates traffic studies of
the Bridgewater site, the former Bally’s site and a level of background growth. The Park
Commons Dr./Monterey leg of the intersection on Park Commons Dr. (going eastbound)
does experience a delay currently and the delay will get worse with the development.
Mr. Walther said the City Council directed staff to explore alternatives that might
improve operations at that particular intersection whether or not the development goes
forward. He discussed the option recommended by City Council to add a dedicated right
turn lane on Park Commons Dr. With this one improvement it will be improved from a
Level of Service D to a Level of Service C with development, which is rated Acceptable.
Mr. Walther reviewed the public process associated with the proposed development.
Commissioner Peilen asked if the entrance on Excelsior Blvd. was for commercial use
only.
Mr. Walther responded the Excelsior Blvd. entrance is for commercial use only.
Commissioner Peilen asked if the developer ever considered Excelsior Blvd. the primary
entrance and exit.
Mr. Walther responded he was not aware of any previous designs that considered that
option.
Commissioner Person asked if the recommended option of Alternative 2 was adopted by
resolution.
Mr. Walther said it was direction to staff at a study session that the improvement should
be included in the city’s Capital Improvement Plan. The CIP will be generated in the
coming months.
Commissioner Kanne asked if the traffic study went down Excelsior Blvd. towards Hwy.
100 at peak hours and looked at congestion there.
Mr. Walther responded that the study results extended to Quentin and Excelsior. He said
that congestion at Excelsior/Hwy 100 has previously been identified in the
Comprehensive Plan. He noted there are limited solutions the city has for that. The city
has explored using more frequently yellow flashing lights throughout intersections. That
could be explored more with Hennepin County as Excelsior is a county road. The city
does not have direct control on when and how those improvements are made.
Chair Johnston-Madison said approaching the entrance for Level 1 parking for bank and
retail to turn in you have to be going west on Excelsior. She asked if the traffic study took
into account how much traffic would result off of Monterey from the opposite direction.
Mr. Walther said the driveway locations and motions were known and the situation she
described was part of the model.
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4i) Page 3
Title: Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of March 16, 2016
The Chair spoke about 50 units/acre and higher densities allowed with PUD. The zoning
table indicates there are 80.8 units/acre.
Mr. Walther explained that for purposes of the report and presentation he used the higher
number for Lot 1 alone. No residential units are proposed on Lot 2. The overall
residential density of both lots combined would be 69.9 units/acre.
Chair Johnston-Madison asked about height perception from the north with underground
parking levels resulting in the building looking like eight stories.
The Chair asked if any of the eight traffic alternatives, other than Alternate 2, were still in
play.
Mr. Walther responded that all alternatives were shared with City Council. The staff did
not recommend the other alternatives. One of them was the idea of doing a traffic signal
at Park Commons Dr. One of the criteria staff used for recommendation was that
whatever intervention was made to improve that one leg of Park Commons Dr. would not
negatively impact other intersections. Excelsior Blvd. is a major road and needs to take
priority over a secondary road.
The Chair asked Mr. Walther to address Alternative 8.
Mr. Walther said all alternatives were considered and all but three were dismissed.
Alternative 8, closing Park Commons Dr., would add a new street going through park
land. It would be very expensive, with a number of limitations to pursuing that option.
Commissioner Person asked about the north access designated as move in/move out only
and easement.
Mr. Walther said there is a 20 foot access easement across the nursing home property that
connects to the service court in that building. Earlier concepts explored the idea of
splitting traffic so all of the P2 parking would exit and enter that site from the driveway.
By dispersing the traffic in that manner it makes all intersections better. There were
concerns from the nursing home about how wide of a space is available there for
emergency vehicles. Residents also raised objections to additional traffic on 36 ½ St.
The developer is not proposing to have additional access to that location.
Chair Johnston-Madison referred to page 19 of the traffic study regarding access B and C
proposed to be 140 ft. apart along Monterey Dr. She referred to MnDOT spacing
guidelines of 330 ft. for urban collector roadways. She asked if the City Council
discussed those figures.
Mr. Walther said City Council was presented that information but it was not discussed in
any detail.
Debra Heiser, Engineering Director, said the figures were noted in the traffic study and
presented to the City Council. She stated that the reality on urban arterials and collectors
is if 330 ft. were applied to every driveway access in the city many driveways would
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4i) Page 4
Title: Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of March 16, 2016
have to be closed. When looking at the speed of the street and the vehicles using these
driveways staff feels that 140 ft. is adequate for the site lines, adequate for safety and
adequate for these driveways on Monterey. She said staff would not support it otherwise.
Ron Mehl, Dominium Development, applicant, spoke about the company and the
development proposal. He said they have worked hard to address concerns and worked
hard to create two separate entrances for commercial space and residential parking. He
answered commissioner questions regarding resident and guest parking.
Chair Johnston-Madison opened the public hearing.
A letter from William Weber, 3824 Huntington, was read into the record by Dennis
Morin, 4509 W. 36 ½ St., #303. In his letter Mr. Weber urged the commission to reject
the applications for preliminary plat and preliminary PUD for the proposed development.
Eleanore Martin, 4820 Park Commons Dr., #233, said with the large apartment building
going up at the former Bally’s site she didn’t understand why another large complex was
needed at Excelsior and Monterey. She said she understood the city fathers believe in
encouraging small businesses so it makes no sense to force out established businesses,
such as TechLine, to make room for a complex that nobody wants. She said Excelsior
Blvd. will look like a cross between a wind tunnel and a traffic jam.
Jan Anderson, 4517 W. 36 ½ St., said besides traffic and noise she is concerned about
trees being removed which are homes to wildlife. She said she is concerned about the
small businesses that have been asked to leave. She said they won’t come back. She said
two businesses have gone to Edina. She commented that the commercial spaces will be
boring things that people won’t spend much time enjoying. Ms. Anderson said in the
past the walk from Monterey to Slumberland has been fun. There are trees and the
businesses are fun. That will all be gone. She said she is concerned that her own rent will
increase due to the development.
Denise Davis, 4820 Park Commons Dr. condominium, Wolfe Park neighborhood
association vice chair, said neighbors are concerned about traffic, increased crime,
congestion and dropping property values. Transients will be moving in. She said she has
lived in St. Louis Park for 32 years. Neighbors tell her that they are unwilling to give up
their cars. People in her building are a little bit older. Some have impediments and can’t
walk to a light rail station. She spoke about pedestrians often crossing Excelsior illegally.
The neighborhood is growing very rapidly. She said she’d like to see a moratorium on
any future development until the ramifications are known about traffic, congestion and
parking at 4900 Excelsior.
Patti Carlson, 3801 Inglewood Ave. S., 40 year resident, said she feels betrayed by the
city for this development. In spite of the traffic study, it is very difficult to cross Excelsior
Blvd. because of people turning left into Trader Joe’s and sometimes turning right into
the small businesses. Trader Joe’s is a mess. Now there will be another situation with
two uncontrolled opposing streets. It feels a lot like Wooddale to her. She said she can
understand having a dedicated left and right turn lane. But she said there are problems
with being in right turn lane and the left turn driver edges forward resulting in difficulty
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4i) Page 5
Title: Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of March 16, 2016
telling if the other drive can go forward. She requested no yellow arrows for crossing
Excelsior. She said it is dangerous enough as it is and the pedestrian crossing signal is the
only protection pedestrians have crossing Excelsior. She said she feels her neighborhood
is blocked off from getting to Highway 100 or the library. She said the traffic study
wasn’t done on a Saturday afternoon near Trader Joe’s. She spoke about lack of light in
the winter and ground floor units. She said she didn’t find the shadow studies acceptable.
She said she didn’t appreciate the traffic study ratings of acceptable. She said she would
like the consideration of the human effects of this development.
Terry Warner, 3020 Florida Ave. S., said the proposed development is being built in the
wrong place. He spoke about the vacant areas between Hwy. 100 and Hwy. 169 on
Minnetonka Blvd. that would have less traffic problems and good bus service for
development. He suggested the use of roundabouts on Monterey.
Meghan Phimister, 3451 Zarthan Ave., 30 year resident, asked if the commercial parking
level and residential parking levels were accessible to each other.
Ron Mehl, applicant, said residential parking, except for guest parking, is connected
inside the ramp that drops down under the commercial space. Residents can enter the
building from the ramp by fob access only.
Ms. Phimister discussed the petition with 330 resident signatures which residents gave to
the City Council about one year ago. She said that night the city went ahead with its
vision for Excelsior and Monterey. Tonight the city is hearing the neighborhood vision
for the corner. She hoped the city could listen and take a step back look back to look at
this area and the surrounding area. She spoke about the new ice rink and a new
community center which will create more traffic. She said every time she comes to the
city she’s discussing little individual projects and is concerned the city doesn’t look at the
entire view. People are concerned about infrastructure, mobility, walkability and over-
saturation of apartments. She said she lives close to the PLACE proposal right on 7 and
Wooddale and struggles with commuting through that area to get to Trader Joe’s and then
has to deal with the traffic there. She said she hopes the Commission comes to talk about
PLACE and doesn’t support moving forward with that project because that is being
pushed in as well.
Alberto Bertomeu, 4419 Excelsior Blvd., said it is an emotional issue and it takes time for
listening and venting. He said he isn’t for or against the project. He said he owns
buildings surrounding the property. Honey and Rye is a small business succeeding in an
area of larger projects. Ciel has signed a lease for his property across the street. Techline
moved to Edina when it merged with another company. He said he is trying to keep some
small businesses intact. He said he owns the Jiffy Carwash. He spoke about the good
design and scale of the Bridgewater Bank building. He said he knows traffic is a problem.
He spoke about difficulties for pedestrian crossing of Excelsior and Boulevard and
general lack of respect shown to pedestrians by drivers.
Phil Freshman, 3912 Natchez, 25 year resident, spoke about very little consideration for
people living in the area. There is the ice rink, 4900 Excelsior, and now Bridgewater
development. There are impacts collectively to this area. He said the fixes on Park
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4i) Page 6
Title: Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of March 16, 2016
Commons Dr. are a band-aid. He said he doesn’t hear anything about ameliorations in
the neighborhoods. He spoke of Natchez which is used by vehicles going 40 mph to
avoid Excelsior Blvd. On his block there are about 15 kids under age 12. The proposal is
misguided and it is about raising property tax income to invest for the ice rink and other
projects. He said it is tremendously harmful in general. He said had he known about the
petition he would have signed it. He hopes the petition can be recirculated. The city is
imposing the developments on the neighborhood and saying the neighborhood should
deal with it.
Jon Schaefer, 3914 Lynn, resident since 1965, asked what evidence the commission
doesn’t already have in the last two years that will allow for a no vote for the
development. 330 petitions? Has it been looked at and listened to? How tall is too tall
for a development? How much congestion is too much congestion for the neighborhood?
How does a luxury apartment building help St. Louis Park residents who want to stay but
are unable to stay because they can’t afford the apartments? How does it help small
businesses stay in St. Louis Park?
Nino Pedrely, 3755 Glenhurst Ave., 10 year resident, discussed Tax Increment Financing
(TIF). He asked why projects in a fairly established neighborhood can’t be done on a
market rate basis since we’re at the top of the apartment development cycle.
Mr. Walther stated there isn’t a TIF application at this stage. There are no details for any
agreement at this time.
Greg Hunt, Economic Development Coordinator, spoke about a typical TIF project where
the base taxes would continue to accrue to the respective taxing jurisdiction. It is the
added value from the development that potentially could be used to reimburse the
developer for certain extraordinary costs incurred in the development. He said the city
has a policy in which projects are required to pay for the fiscal disparities from the
project itself.
Dennis Morin, 4509 W. 36 ½ St, #303, 39 year resident, asked the developer if Access B
and C have changed or if they are the same as originally proposed.
Mr. Mehl, applicant, responded that Access B and C have not changed.
Mr. Morin asked if 83% of the apartments are 1 or 2 bedroom units. He asked how many
of the units are affordable.
Chair Johnston-Madison said 20% of the units are affordable.
Mr. Morin distributed a document titled 4400 Exc. Blvd. Traffic Study, May 1, 2015.
Access B and C are proposed 140 feet apart along Monterey Dr. He referenced MnDOT
spacing guidelines of 330 feet.
Debra Heiser, Engineering Director, spoke about the guideline. Staff looked at vehicles
on Monterey and determined that 140 ft. spacing is adequate. There are a number of
driveways like this in the city. Staff does not find this will be unsafe. It can move ahead
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4i) Page 7
Title: Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of March 16, 2016
as it is. Ms. Heiser said it is important, as the developer indicated, to separate the
residential and commercial accesses.
Mr. Morin said Monterey is a major collector of 11,000 cars/day in an urban area which
is a lot different from driveways in a residential neighborhood. He discussed B and C
access with six left turns and six right turns all in 140 feet on Monterey. He said it is an
atypical area with one Excelsior & Grand, one Trader Joe’s and one Bridgewater. He
said it is an unsafe and tightly compressed driveway access plan and they ask the
Commission to deny approval of the PUD and ask the staff and developer to create a
safer and more improved site access plan so the project can move forward.
Ron Mehl, applicant, said they will look at the accesses again but believe that the access
to the north is a sufficient distance and will provide good visibility to the residents
coming out of it. He said they will do more studies on that to share with the City Council.
The existing businesses have not expressed an interest in staying and they will have the
opportunity to lease in that space if they choose. He said he understands there will be a
rent difference. He doesn’t know what that amount is right now. Extensive criminal and
credit background checks are done on their residents. Dominium does not have a crime
problem in any of their developments. He said they will try work on illegal pedestrian
crossing and will address that with planters and landscaping and trying as best they can to
direct pedestrian traffic to intersections from this development. The new development
will help in particular with affordability so that people are not priced out of this
community. There are 35 units for persons making up to 50% of median income in
Hennepin County. 48% of the units are one bedroom, 48% are two bedroom and 4% are
3 bedroom.
The Chair added into the record correspondence from Russell Redman, 3833 Kipling
Ave. S. Mr. Redman wrote in opposition to the development.
Chair Johnston-Madison closed the public hearing as no one else was present wishing to
speak.
Commissioner Robertson said it is the kind of application the Commission struggles with.
We hear the neighborhood concerns and opposition. In reference to moratorium, he said
the city is coming to the time of doing its Comprehensive Plan again and a lot has
happened in the last 10 years. It would be good to restudy the whole area and see where
it wants to go. In the meantime, it is owner’s right to sell property and develop it. He
discussed pedestrian concerns. He said in his business as an architect he works with
engineers all the time and there is a certain amount of trust in the models that are used.
He said the project is well-designed, well sited, and the stepping down design is good
along Monterey. He uses shadow studies all of the time. He said he will give a move
ahead vote.
Commissioner Peilen said she has also struggled as she hears the concerns. She spoke
about development in her own neighborhood. She knows Dominium’s work and it has a
good reputation and runs good buildings without problems. The design is good and the
project is well thought through. She said with numerous reservations she is willing to
give it a move ahead vote.
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4i) Page 8
Title: Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of March 16, 2016
Commissioner Person spoke about the problems with left turns out of Access A and B.
He said in the future the city would have to consider prohibiting those left turns.
Developing the north access into a full residential access would mitigate a lot of that
problem. He said he hears the neighborhood issues but the Commission needs to
determine if the proposal conforms with the PUD ordinance.
Commissioner Kanne said it is a livability issue. She said no one she has spoken to in St.
Louis Park likes the project. She stated she doesn’t like small businesses leaving and she
doesn’t like cookie cutter buildings going up. She said she has serious reservations and
will probably vote in opposition to the project.
The Chair said it is a quality project with a good developer. She said her position hasn’t
changed since the Comprehensive Plan request. She said if the development had come
out of a development guidelines process created like the one for Excelsior & Grand and
for the Ellipse site, she would have a different perspective on this development.
Development guidelines have been worked on for the south side of Excelsior Blvd. and
some good things are in place. She said there are no development guidelines for the north
side of Excelsior from Ellipse to Monterey. It was asked for by residents almost a year
ago. She said she has concerns about traffic. Chair Johnston-Madison said we need to
look at, at least in this community, not just capacity on a road but the quality of life for
people in that area. If we want Excelsior Blvd., Excelsior and Monterey, 36 ½ St. and
Belt Line Blvd. to be a walkable community we are going the wrong way. She said she
would not be voting in favor.
Commissioner Robertson made a motion recommending approval of the Preliminary Plat
with Subdivision Variances and Preliminary Planned Unit Development (PUD) with
meeting notes and comments provided to Council. Commissioner Person seconded the
motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 3-2 (Johnston-Madison and Kanne opposed).
4. Other Business
A. Consideration of Resolution – Wayzata Boulevard TIF District
Conformance with Comprehensive Plan
Greg Hunt, Economic Development Coordinator, presented the staff report.
Commissioner Person asked how often the city takes action to create a TIF District
without a development proposal.
Mr. Hunt said this is an unusual circumstance but in this case the city will lose its ability
to create a TIF District due to statutorily only having 3 years after a demolition to create a
TIF District.
Commissioner Peilen asked about the necessity to attract a developer and the
extraordinary costs of developing the site.
Mr. Hunt said that is part of the equation in developing the site. He added that it is a
very attractive and highly visible site.
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2016 (Item No. 4i) Page 9
Title: Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of March 16, 2016
Commissioner Robertson made a motion recommending approval of the resolution
finding that the proposed Tax Increment Financing Plans for the establishment of
Wayzata Boulevard Tax Increment Financing District conform to the general plans for
the development and redevelopment of the City. Commissioner Peilen seconded the
motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 5-0.
5. Communications
The April 6 Planning Commission meeting has been canceled. The Commission will
meet on April 20.
6. Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 8:20 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Nancy Sells
Recording Secretary