The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2016/04/18 - ADMIN - Agenda Packets - City Council - RegularAGENDA APRIL 18, 2016 6:30 p.m. SPECIAL STUDY SESSION – Community Room Discussion Items 1. 55 min. Partners in Energy Climate Action Plan (Energy Work Group of E&S Commission) 7:30 p.m. CITY COUNCIL MEETING – Council Chambers 1. Call to Order 1a. Pledge of Allegiance 1b. Roll Call 2. Presentations 2a. National Volunteer Recognition Day Proclamation 3. Approval of Minutes 3a. Closed Executive Session Minutes March 21, 2016 3b. City Council Meeting Minutes March 21, 2016 4. Approval of Agenda and Items on Consent Calendar NOTE: The Consent Calendar lists those items of business which are considered to be routine and/or which need no discussion. Consent items are acted upon by one motion. If discussion is desired by either a Councilmember or a member of the audience, that item may be moved to an appropriate section of the regular agenda for discussion. The items for the Consent Calendar are listed on the last page of the Agenda. Recommended Action: Motion to approve the Agenda as presented and items listed on the Consent Calendar; and to waive reading of all resolutions and ordinances. (Alternatively: Motion to add or remove items from the agenda, or move items from Consent Calendar to regular agenda for discussion.) 5. Boards and Commissions -- None 6. Public Hearings 6a. Mount Olivet Private Activity Revenue Bonds Recommended Action: Mayor to close public hearing. Motion to Adopt Resolution authorizing issuance of Health Care Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds for Mount- Olivet. 7. Requests, Petitions, and Communications from the Public – None 8. Resolutions, Ordinances, Motions and Discussion Items 8a. Adopt 2012 International Property Maintenance Code with Amendments Recommended Action: Motion to approve first reading adopting 2012 International Property Maintenance Code (IPMC) with Amendments in Chapter 6 Article V – Property Maintenance Code, Chapter 12 Article II Nuisances and set second reading May 2, 2016. 9. Communications – None Meeting of April 18, 2016 City Council Agenda Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. To make arrangements, please call the Administration Department at 952/924-2525 (TDD 952/924-2518) at least 96 hours in advance of meeting. Immediately following City Council Meeting SPECIAL STUDY SESSION Continued – Community Room Discussion Items 2. 45 min. Excelsior & Monterey Redevelopment (Bridgewater/Dominium) 3. 60 min. Wooddale/Hwy 7 Traffic Study Update 4. 10 min. Boards & Commissions Appointments (Verbal) Meeting of April 18, 2016 City Council Agenda CONSENT CALENDAR 4a. Adopt Resolution authorizing the special assessment for the repair of the water service line at 3341 Glenhurst Avenue South, St. Louis Park, MN. P.I.D. 06-028-24-14-0079. 4b. Approve second reading and Adopt Ordinance amending the zoning map, and approve the summary ordinance for publication. 4c. Designate Visu-Sewer, Inc. as the lowest responsible bidder and authorize execution of a contract with the firm in the amount of $264,874.30 for the Sanitary Sewer Main Rehab Project #4016-3000. 4d. Designate Allied Blacktop Co. the lowest responsible bidder and authorize execution of a contract with the firm in the amount of $360,172.79 for Street Maintenance Project (Sealcoat Streets-Area 1– Project No. 4016-1200). 4e. Approve a Temporary On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for the Heilicher Minneapolis Jewish Day School for an event to be held on May 24, 2016, at the Sabes Jewish Community Center, 4330 Cedar Lake Road in St. Louis Park. 4f. Appoint Thom Miller as a City Council Representative to the Community Education Advisory Commission for a term expiring May 31, 2019. 4g. Adopt Resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to execute a purchase agreement for approximately 4.77 acres of property owned by the City of Minneapolis located at 40th St. and France Ave. St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority and regular City Council meetings are carried live on Civic TV cable channel 17 and replays are frequent; check www.parktv.org for the schedule. The meetings are also streamed live on the internet at www.parktv.org, and saved for Video on Demand replays. The agenda is posted on Fridays on the official city bulletin board in the lobby of City Hall and on the text display on Civic TV cable channel 17. The agenda and full packet are available by noon on Friday on the city’s website. Meeting: Special Study Session Meeting Date: April 18, 2016 Discussion Item: 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Partners in Energy Climate Action Plan (Energy Work Group of E&S Commission) RECOMMENDED ACTION: No action needed at this time. Members of the Environment & Sustainability Commission will present climate action components of the Energy Plan created from the Partners in Energy project. POLICY CONSIDERATION: None at this time. SUMMARY: The Environment & Sustainability Commission’s Energy Work Group have been working on a long term project with Xcel Energy, called Partners in Energy. This project is a multi-stakeholder initiative to produce an Energy Plan, including climate action planning components, for the entire community of St. Louis Park. The youth from iMatter, who presented their climate change concerns to Council on March 21st, have been invited to attend this presentation. NEXT STEPS: A request will be made for adoption by the City Council of a resolution with a list of requests and goals outlined in the presentation, including the iMatter youth Climate Inheritance Draft Resolution. For example, future goals might include supporting net zero human emissions by 2040 where changes in city operations would be required. Ways to meet this goal could include increasing renewable energy used for city operations and for all community members, continuous tracking of greenhouse gases, and decreasing atmospheric carbon emissions. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Future actions such as developing a detailed climate action plan, greenhouse gas tracking, solar and other renewable purchases will have costs yet to be determined at this point. VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a leader in environmental stewardship. We will increase environmental consciousness and responsibility in all areas of city business. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: iMatter Climate Inheritance Draft Resolution Prepared by: Shannon Pinc, Environment & Sustainability Coordinator Reviewed by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Special Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 1) Page 2 Title: Partners in Energy Climate Action Plan (Energy Work Group of E&S Commission) RESOLUTION NO. 16-____ RESOLUTION EXPRESSING THE COMMITMENT OF THE ST. LOUIS PARK CITY COUNCIL TO PROTECT THE CHILDREN AND GRANDCHILDREN OF THIS COMMUNITY FROM THE RISKS OF CLIMATE DESTRUCTION WHEREAS, 195 countries, including the United States and every country that is a member of the United Nations, reached an agreement in Paris, France on December 12, 2015, that recognizes the risk to our children’s and grandchildren’s future from climate change; WHEREAS, the greatest burden resulting from an inadequate response to the climate crisis will be carried by the youngest generation, and all who follow; WHEREAS, the risks from an inadequate response are potentially devastating, and include economic and environmental disruptions many of which are already being felt such as more severe storms, longer and hotter heat waves, worsening flood and drought cycles, growing invasive species and insect problems, accelerated species extinction rates, rising sea levels, increased wildfires, and a dramatic increase in refugees from climate impacted lands; WHEREAS, leading climate scientists have indicated that further delay in significantly reducing greenhouse gas emissions will rapidly push humanity past the point where disastrous consequences can be avoided; WHEREAS, numerous governmental and non-governmental bodies across the nation and the world have already adopted climate action plans to immediately and rapidly reduce greenhouse gas emissions while also stopping them entirely within 25 years; WHEREAS, youth of St. Louis Park have brought this Council a Youth Climate Report Card highlighting the gap between what we are doing today and actions that would be necessary to protect their future; WHEREAS, youth of St. Louis Park have indicated a willingness to work with this Council on such actions, we, therefore, declare it: BE IT RESOLVED, that St. Louis Park City Council commits to working constructively, using ingenuity, innovation, and courageous determination to create a St. Louis Park Climate Action Plan for consideration that significantly reduces St. Louis Park’s greenhouse gas emissions to levels that would protect our community’s children and grandchildren from the risk of climate destruction BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this City Council commits to start the St. Louis Climate Action Plan creation process within 30 days, and to complete it as soon as possible BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a mechanism will be created to for the ongoing inclusion of young people in the process of creating and executing climate related policies and actions. Special Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 1) Page 3 Title: Partners in Energy Climate Action Plan (Energy Work Group of E&S Commission) Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 18, 2016 Presentation: 2a EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: National Volunteer Recognition Day Proclamation RECOMMENDED ACTION: The Mayor is asked to read the attached proclamation. POLICY CONSIDERATION: None at this time. SUMMARY: Volunteer Recognition Day is April 20, 2016. The attached proclamation will honor those who selflessly donate their time and talents to the City of St. Louis Park. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged community. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Proclamation Prepared by: Laura Smith, Wellness and Volunteer Coordinator Reviewed by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 2a) Page 2 Title: National Volunteer Recognition Day Proclamation PROCLAMATION National Volunteer Recognition Day Honoring Boards and Commissions Volunteers and City Volunteers WHEREAS, citizen involvement enhances the quality and responsiveness of public decision making and the progress of the community; and WHEREAS, city volunteers are an essential part of St. Louis Park, vital to our future as a caring and productive community; and integral to our vision of becoming a connected and engaged community; and WHEREAS, city volunteers continue to selflessly give their compassion, time, and commitment to better their community and the lives of others; and WHEREAS, city volunteers continue to make a difference through their hard work, dedication and outstanding contributions to the City of St. Louis Park; and WHEREAS, various Boards and Commissions serve in an advisory capacity to the City of St. Louis Park City Council and are conferred various degrees of decision making power of the City; and WHEREAS, volunteers are working on the behalf of others without being motivated by financial or material gain; and WHEREAS, volunteering is renowned for skill development, socialization, and fun; and WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park encourages everyone to observe Volunteer Recognition Day by thanking a volunteer, getting involved in a volunteer activity, or donating to a volunteer group; NOW THEREFORE, let it be known that the Mayor and City Council of the City of St. Louis Park do hereby proclaim April 20, 2016 as Volunteer Recognition Day and commend volunteers of St. Louis Park for their dedicated service and outstanding contributions to improving the quality of lives of others, and supporting our community and its people. WHEREFORE, I set my hand and cause the Great Seal of the City of St. Louis Park to be affixed this 18th day of April, 2016. ______________________________________ Jacob Spano, Mayor Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 18, 2016 Minutes: 3a UNOFFICIAL MINUTES CITY COUNCIL CLOSED EXECUTIVE SESSION ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA MARCH 21, 2016 The meeting convened at 6:15 p.m. Councilmembers present: Mayor Jake Spano, Tim Brausen, Steve Hallfin, Gregg Lindberg, Anne Mavity, Thom Miller, and Susan Sanger Councilmembers absent: None Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening) 1. Acquisition of 40th Street and France Avenue Property The City Council met in Closed Executive Session to discuss the acquisition of the 40th Street and France Avenue Property. 2. City Manager Evaluation The City Council met in Closed Executive Session to review the information from the annual performance review for the City Manager. The meeting adjourned at 7:10 p.m. ______________________________________ _____________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Jake Spano, Mayor Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 18, 2016 Minutes: 3b UNOFFICIAL MINUTES CITY COUNCIL MEETING ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA MARCH 21, 2016 1. Call to Order Mayor Jacobs called the meeting to order at 7:32 p.m. Councilmembers present: Mayor Jake Spano, Tim Brausen, Steve Hallfin, Gregg Lindberg, Anne Mavity, Thom Miller, and Susan Sanger. Councilmembers absent: None. Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), City Attorney (Mr. Mattick), Deputy City Manager/Human Resources Director (Ms. Deno), Economic Development Specialist (Ms. Grove), Engineering Director (Ms. Heiser), Associate Planner (Ms. Mardell), Assistant Zoning Administrator (Mr. Morrison), Senior Engineering Project Director (Mr. Shamla), Communications Specialist (Ms. Pribbenow), and Recording Secretary (Ms. Batra). Guests: Jayne Stevenson (Student, St. Louis Park High School), Owen Guyer (Student, St. Louis Park High School), Lucas Reid (Student, St. Louis Park High School), and Sophia Skinner (Student, St. Louis Park High School). 1a. Pledge of Allegiance 1b. Roll Call 2. Presentations 2a. Climate Report Card iMatter SLP High School Youth Jayne Stevenson, 4329 Coolidge Avenue, explained that she is involved in Roots and Shoots at St. Louis Park High School. She is dedicated to ending the climate crisis within her lifetime. She explained what would happen if this issue is not addressed and stated she is concerned and she cares about her future. Owen Guyer, 2901 Toledo Avenue South, stated that climate change has been an important issue to him since he took AP Environmental Science. He frequently takes trips to the Boundary Waters and wishes to preserve that area. He presented the Climate Report Card. In the first area, Zero Emissions Plan, the city received a D because there is no plan at this time. In renewable energy, the city received an A- because the State uses a lot of renewable energy. As far as waste and recycling, the city received an A+ because the city has great waste programs. The city received a C in carbon removal and a ½ grade bonus because youth are involved in the mission. Overall, the city’s grade is a B-. Lucas Reid, 1624 Nevada Avenue South, explained he feels many people will follow their group if they take the lead because the students will have to live with the effects of climate change longer due to their young age. He stated the City of St. Louis Park can be a leader in this worldwide movement. There are people who are willing to give input on this issue in the city. City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 3b) Page 2 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of March 21, 2016 Sophia Skinner, 4521 Valgar Avenue South, explained that the environment has been important to her throughout her life. The increase in carbon dioxide is the greatest it’s ever been, so there’s no more time to waste. She recognizes applying the students’ suggestions would take time and would like to develop a plan, a draft of which has already been created. She stated the time is now to come together to ensure a livable and sustainable future. Mayor Spano stated the students’ presentation is exactly the motivation needed to get things moving. He noted the city does lead in some areas; however, there is room for improvement. Councilmember Hallfin stated the presentation was great. He could tell that the students are very knowledgable on the subject. He explained that recently the Environment and Sustainability Commission was created, and he would like to see that commission work with the students’ draft and then present to Council for review. Councilmember Sanger expressed appreciation of the students’ presentation. She applauds the work done and for giving the Council a push in the right direction. She asked the students what’s next on their agenda. Mr. Guyer stated that Roots and Shoots helps run the compost collection at the school and a fundraiser was conducted to finance future projects. Councilmember Mavity stated that she is impressed with the professionalism and thoughtfulness of the students. She added that the Council welcomes any direction to advance this agenda. Councilmember Miller asked how the students became involved with iMatter and how the students plan to work together with that organization going forward. Ms. Stevenson stated she was connected with Larry Kraft, Executive Director of the iMatter organization, at which time bringing the iMatter agenda items into the city was discussed. Larry Kraft is working as a mentor to the students. Councilmember Lindberg stated his appreciation that the students pointed out areas where the city could improve. He stated that it is time to put action into the commitment the City has made to create a better future. Councilmember Brausen stated this issue is very important to him because he hopes to leave the world in better shape than when he entered. Climate change didn’t happen overnight; therefore, a long-term commitment is required. In addition, he suggested to vote for candidates that care about the environment to channel the passion and help aid the cause. Ryan Griffin, 4980 West 40th Street, explained that he serves on the Environment and Sustainability Commission with Ms. Stevenson. Creating a sustainability action plan is the goal for 2016, and he would like to present some draft goals to the Council on April 18 at the Special Study Session. Patty O’Keefe, 8113 Virginia Circle North, stated she loves this city and plans on living here for a long time. She noted she is impressed with the city’s reaction to the students’ proposal and is proud of the city’s accomplishments. City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 3b) Page 3 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of March 21, 2016 Paul Thompson, representative from iMatter, stated that he always points to St. Louis Park when discussing neighborhood sustainability. Mayor Spano stated that the presentation is very helpful to the city. He explained that when the city enacted the organized curbside compost program, the collection site’s organic matter increased by 40% in one year because of the city’s organics program. The Climate Report Card brought the city’s issues to the forefront. He noted the city can do more and do better. 2b. Recognition of Donations Mayor Spano announced two donations the City received: a $10,000 donation from Arvig Enterprises, Inc., for 144-fiber strand to be installed in one city-owned conduit and a $40 donation from Common Hope Staff for the Westwood Hills Nature Center. 2c. ParkTV Local Programming Month Proclamation Mayor Spano presented the proclamation to John McHugh for ParkTV Local Programming Month. 3. Approval of Minutes 3a. City Council Study Session Meeting Minutes February 8, 2016 The minutes were approved as presented. It was moved by Councilmember Brausen and seconded by Councilmember Hallfin to approve the February 8, 2016 Study Session Minutes as presented. 3b. City Council Special Study Session Meeting Minutes February 16, 2016 The minutes were approved as presented. It was moved by Councilmember Lindberg and seconded by Councilmember Miller to approve the February 16, 2016 Special Study Session Minutes as presented. 3c. City Council Meeting Minutes February 16, 2016 The minutes were approved as presented. It was moved by Councilmember Miller and seconded by Councilmember Lindberg to approve the February 16, 2016 Council Meeting Minutes as presented. 4. Approval of Agenda and Items on Consent Calendar NOTE: The Consent Calendar lists those items of business which are considered to be routine and/or which need no discussion. Consent items are acted upon by one motion. If discussion is desired by either a Councilmember or a member of the audience, that item may be moved to an appropriate section of the regular agenda for discussion. City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 3b) Page 4 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of March 21, 2016 4a. Adopt Resolution No. 16-037 to recognize Captain Deane Wallick for his 35 years of service to the City of St. Louis Park. 4b. Adopt Resolution No. 16-038 approving acceptance of donation of fiber strand cable from Arvig Enterprises, Inc. 4c. Adopt Resolution No. 16-039 authorizing the installation of “No Parking” restrictions on the south side of Lake Street from Webster Avenue to 50 feet southwest of Webster Avenue. 4d. Adopt Resolution No. 16-040 authorizing the installation of “No Parking” restrictions on the south side of the alley between Maryland/Louisiana Avenue and 31st/32nd Street. 4e. Adopt Resolution No. 16-041 rescinding prior traffic controls and authorizing the installation of stop signs on 29th Street at Brunswick Avenue. 4f. Adopt Resolution No. 16-042 authorizing calling for a Public Hearing on April 18, 2016 on the issuance of Health Care Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds and authorizing the publication of a notice of the hearing for the Mount Olivet Project. 4g. Adopt Resolution No. 16-043 approving acceptance of a monetary donation from the Common Hope staff in the amount of $40 for Westwood Hills Nature Center. 4h. Declare Gamble Drive, adjacent to the West End, as the official West End Festival Site. 4i. Designate Michels Corporation as the lowest responsible bidder and authorize execution of a contract with the firm in the amount of $134,891.00 for the Sanitary Sewer Main Rehab Project No. 4016-3000. 4j. Approve for filing Planning Commission Minutes of February 3, 2016 4k. Approve for filing Telecommunications Commission Minutes of December 9, 2015 4l. Approve for filing Environment & Sustainability Commission Meeting Minutes of December 2, 2015 4m. Approve for filing Environment & Sustainability Commission Meeting Minutes of January 6, 2016 4n. Approve for filing Parks & Rec Advisory Commission Minutes of December 2, 2015 4o. Approve for filing Parks & Rec Advisory Commission Minutes of January 20, 2016 4p. Approve for filing Parks & Rec Advisory Commission Minutes of February 17, 2016 It was moved by Councilmember Brausen, seconded by Councilmember Sanger, to approve the Agenda as presented on the Consent Calendar; and to waive reading of all resolutions and ordinances. The motion passed 7-0. 5. Boards and Commissions - None 6. Public Hearings 6a. Public Hearing - Establishment of the Wayzata Blvd Tax Increment Financing District. Resolution No. 16-044 City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 3b) Page 5 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of March 21, 2016 Mr. Hunt presented the staff report regarding the proposed resolution approving the establishment of the Wayzata Boulevard Tax Increment Financing District within Redevelopment Project No. 1 and referenced the presentation given at the EDA meeting. Mayor Spano opened the public hearing. No speakers were present. Mayor Spano closed the public hearing. It was moved by Councilmember Brausen, seconded by Councilmember Sanger to adopt Resolution No. 16-044 approving the establishment of the Wayzata Blvd Tax Increment Financing District within Redevelopment Project No. 1 (a redevelopment district). The motion passed 7-0. 7. Requests, Petitions, and Communications from the Public – None 8. Resolutions, Ordinances, Motions and Discussion Items 8a. Project Report: MSA Project - Flag Avenue/ Quentin Avenue Project No. 4016-1100. Resolution No. 16-045 and 16-046 Mr. Shamla presented the staff report regarding the pavement improvement project plan on Flag Avenue and Quentin Avenue. Mr. Shamla explained that on Flag Avenue, staff is proposing a 2-inch mill and overlay, random curb and sidewalk replacement, abandoning a 6-inch watermain between 18th Street and Franklin Avenue, repair of the water valves and storm piping, and new curb ramps to meet ADA standards. On Quentin Avenue, staff is proposing to install a 2-inch mill and overlay. Mr. Shamla explained that in order to get parking on one side, a 32 foot width is required. The City has proposed no parking on one side of the street to meet the state standards to receive funding. On one section, there is no parking on either side due to the fact that the road is too narrow. Notice was given to residents and business owners, and only one response was received. An open house was conducted on January 21, 2016, and residents were generally accepting of the design following discussion with staff. Mr. Shamla explained that the project is expected to take two months to complete. The road will be open to traffic during construction. The project is estimated to cost $825,644. Councilmember Sanger asked, with regard to Quentin Avenue, which specific blocks are affected and what is the timing of the project. Mr. Shamla responded that the project will be complete in four days and will be done at night so traffic will not be obstructed. It was moved by Councilmember Brausen, seconded by Councilmember Sanger, to adopt Resolution No. 16-045 accepting the project report, establishing improvement project No. 4016-1100, approving plans and specifications, and authorizing advertisement for bids as recommended by Staff; to adopt Resolution No. 16-046 authorizing installation of “No Parking” restrictions on Flag Avenue between 18th Street and Cedar Lake Road. City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 3b) Page 6 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of March 21, 2016 Councilmember Brausen stated he appreciates the staff’s work on this project and asked for residents’ patience and understanding during construction. The motion passed 7-0. 8b. AC Hotel by Marriott Final Planned Unit Development Ms. Mardell presented the staff report regarding the AC Hotel by Marriott Final Planned Unit Development. Planning staff reviewed the plans and found that the vision remains consistent with the city’s plan for that area. Ms. Mardell presented a slide that displayed the east, west, north, and south sides of the buildings. She discussed the characteristics of the proposed hotel, which includes 126 rooms, 189 parking stalls, and 3500 square feet for a restaurant and lounge serving light appetizers and a breakfast bar. She discussed the hotel’s plan for landscaping and the rooftop deck. A neighborhood meeting was held on January 27, 2016 and three people attended. Parking was the major concern among those in attendance at the meeting. In response to Councilmember Miller’s inquiry about the hotel’s completion date, Ms. Mardell stated that the project is scheduled to be complete in the spring of 2017. It was moved by Councilmember Brausen, seconded by Councilmember Lindberg, to approve the first reading of Ordinance approving the Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) for AC Hotel by Marriott, Central Park West Phase III, subject to conditions and to set the second reading for April 4, 2016 Councilmember Sanger asked for clarification on “bar/restaurant” and if the hotel is bound by the State’s statutory requirements. Ms. Mardell confirmed that the bar/restaurant will follow the State’s guidelines. Mayor Spano asked about the City of Golden Valley and whether any problems are anticipated when the plan is presented to that city. Ms. Mardell stated she does not anticipate any objections from Golden Valley City Council. Councilmember Brausen stated he is happy to see that the number of rooms has been scaled down and the project is following green building practices. Councilmember Miller stated he is very impressed with the unique mix of leasing and retail in the West End. The motion passed 7-0. 8c. Arlington Row Apartments East –Preliminary & Final Plat and Preliminary & Final PUD (First Reading). Resolution No. 16-047 Ms. Grove presented the staff report regarding Arlington Row Apartments East – Preliminary and Final Plat and Preliminary and Final PUD, which is located in the northwest quadrant of the city. Ms. Grove discussed the development’s history. The Council gave direction that this property should be developed as mixed-use or multi-family development. The Council approved purchasing this property, which was then purchased in May, 2015, and sold to the applicant in July, 2015. A public hearing was held on February 17, 2016, and a neighborhood meeting was also held in February. City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 3b) Page 7 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of March 21, 2016 Ms. Grove explained the applicant is proposing to create one lot out of seven single-family home lots. She noted the homes were taken by Mn/DOT and demolished for the 394 corridor. Ms. Grove discussed the plat, sidewalks, and the drainage/utility easement variance. She explained that Wayzata Boulevard is at a lower elevation than the lot. Ms. Grove explained that the site plan is for a 3-story building with 27 units, 43 surface parking spaces, and 51 bike spaces. In addition, the development received a grant from the Metropolitan Council to incorporate solar/geothermal/storm water into the plans. As part of this grant, the developer has agreed to create six units eligible for affordable housing at 80% area median income. A 10-foot retaining wall will be constructed to address the slope issue on the site, which is about 3-feet on the west side and up to 10-feet to Wayzata Boulevard. The development will consist of 11 one-bedroom units and 16 two-bedroom units. Ms. Grove stated that a traffic study was conducted and the key intersections in the plan were examined. The study found that there will be no change in the level of service so there are no traffic control changes recommended at this time. Ms. Grove discussed the public hearing that was held on the proposed development. Some of the residents who attended the meeting had concerns about increased traffic, the height and scale of the building, negative impacts on property value, and/or concern about potential on-street parking. Once the development is constructed, parking will be addressed should a problem actually occur. Councilmember Brausen asked if a stairwell was planned to be constructed in the northeast corner to go to Wayzata Boulevard. Mike Engel, architect, responded that there is a connection on the western side, but there is not a connection on the eastern side due to the grade change. Councilmember Brausen asked about vines on the retaining wall. The developer responded that nothing is planned at this time; however, that is an excellent idea. Councilmember Mavity asked if there is free access to move towards the transit center to soften the retaining wall. The developer responded that there currently is no sidewalk there. Councilmember Sanger noticed that there will be more two-bedroom units than one- bedroom units. She stated her appreciation of the uniqueness of the proposed design. In response to Councilmember Sanger’s question about the cost of rent for the development, the developer responded that rents will be from $1.65 to $1.70 per foot, which is substantially lower than other luxury rentals in the area. In addition, the geothermal system will further reduce costs due to lower cost for utilities. Councilmember Lindberg stated this project makes absolute sense for the city, because it includes new construction living and great amenities for a more affordable price. It was moved by Councilmember Brausen, seconded by Councilmember Mavity, to adopt Resolution No. 16-047, approving the Preliminary and Final Plat with Subdivision Variance of Arlington Row Apartments East with conditions; and approve First Reading of Ordinance creating Section 36-268-PUD 5 and amending the Zoning Map from R-3 Two-Family Residence to PUD 5 for property on the 7700 block of Wayzata Boulevard and to set the Second Reading of the Ordinance for April 4, 2016. City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 3b) Page 8 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of March 21, 2016 Councilmember Brausen expressed his approval of the development. As always, the residents are concerned about traffic; however, this area is built to handle a high volume of traffic. Also, staff and developers are aware that parking could be an issue, and it will be addressed if it’s a problem. The motion passed 7-0. 8d. Conditional Use Permit – Mister Car Wash, 8700 MN Highway 7. Resolution No. 16-048. Mr. Morrison presented the staff report regarding a Conditional Use Permit for Mister Car Wash located at 8700 MN Highway 7. Mr. Morrison explained that the property is located on the north side of Highway 7 between Super Target and Knollwood. Mister Car Wash is proposing to construct an addition and add parking spaces. The business is looking to change the layout to make services more efficient. The proposed development of this project is all outside of the flood fringe. A public hearing was held on February 16, and no one attended. Staff is recommending approval of this resolution as listed in the staff report. Councilmember Lindberg asked if the Watershed District has any input regarding the water waste. Mr. Morrison responded that the Watershed District did approve the application. Councilmember Sanger asked about the use of water at the car wash and whether there is a provision for re-use. Mr. Vaughn, owner of Mister Car Wash, responded that water is reused for wheel cleaning and undercarriage. Councilmember Lindberg asked about chemicals in use at the car wash. Mr. Vaughn stated that his business uses biodegradable products that are safe for the environment. Councilmember Lindberg urged caution with use of chemicals, water usage, and the creek nearby. It was moved by Councilmember Lindberg, seconded by Councilmember Mavity, to adopt Resolution No. 16-048, rescinding the existing Special Permit to allow a car wash in the C-2 General Commercial zoning district and FEMA floodplain, and approving a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to operate and expand the existing car wash in the C-2 General Commercial zoning district and FEMA floodplain, subject to conditions recommended by staff. The motion passed 7-0. 8e. 1st Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Related to Distilleries and Cocktail Rooms. Mr. Morrison presented the staff report regarding the proposed ordinance amendment for distilleries and cocktail rooms. The proposed amendment has three parts - establish a land use definition for microdistillery and cocktail room; allow a microdistillery in the Business Park, Industrial Park, and General Industrial Districts; and allow a microdistillery in the Business Park and Industrial Park District to operate a cocktail room. City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 3b) Page 9 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of March 21, 2016 Mr. Morrison discussed the exclusion for General Industrial District for cocktail rooms and the reasons that the cocktail rooms do not meet that definition. There is some overlap with other businesses, and outdoor storage is not permitted at all in this district. A public hearing was conducted on January 17, 2016, and staff is recommending approval and setting a Second Reading for April 4, 2016. Councilmember Mavity stated that she’s excited that Ward 2 is attracting urban and funky businesses. She explained that she sees this type of business as the leading edge. She commented that the reasons the City would not include General Industrial Districts with these allowances doesn’t make sense. In addition, she doesn’t understand the connection with outside storage and why that would prohibit cocktail rooms. She stated that the ordinances are written far too narrow for what she sees as the vision for this area. She explained that she would not support a Second Reading without changes that incorporate her thoughts. Councilmember Miller stated that he would like to add cocktail rooms and distilleries to the General Industrial District. He would like to make a motion that these types of businesses would be allowable in the General Industrial District. Mayor Spano stated that for consistency’s sake, this change should also apply to taprooms. Mr. Mattick stated that the point is taken; however, adding taprooms was not discussed at the public hearing so it would have to be a different ordinance because this proposed change has not been presented. In response to Councilmember Hallfin’s request for clarification, Mr. Walther explained that currently microdisterillies are allowed in the zoning district under the ordinance but cocktail rooms are not presently allowed. Councilmember Hallfin stated that he agrees with Councilmember Mavity in that he would like to see cocktail rooms in this area. Additionally, he doesn’t see that outdoor storage is an issue. Councilmember Brausen suggested that the issue can be addressed by adding a cocktail room as a conditional use. Councilmember Sanger expressed her agreement with Councilmember Brausen’s suggestion. Councilmember Sanger suggested that rather than amending the ordinance tonight, the Council could pass the First Reading and review this change for the Second Reading so the decision could be better informed. Councilmember Lindberg stated that he agrees with Councilmember Mavity in part, but also agrees with some of Councilmember Brausen’s and Councilmember Sanger’s suggestions. He commented that it would be beneficial to have the discussion and give the public a chance to weigh in. Councilmember Miller stated he would like to add a conditional use as Councilmember Brausen suggested because microdisterillies are new to the City and the Council does not know how these businesses might affect the area. Mr. Walther explained the approval process of a conditional use and the effect on businesses. Councilmember Mavity stated that she does not want to make it more difficult to do business in this area. Rather, she explained that she wants to make it easy to invest. City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 3b) Page 10 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of March 21, 2016 Councilmember Sanger stated that while she understands the need to move this along, she would like to allow staff to come up with some restriction so the small business won’t be hindered. Mayor Spano stated his concern about having two sets of rules for similar uses: microdistillery versus taprooms. He stated he is inclined to listen to staff’s direction on this issue. Councilmember Sanger asked if staff could structure this as a permit with conditions to address residential proximity. Mr. Mattick stated the possibility exists; however, the conditions would have to exist in advance. Councilmember Mavity stated that she cannot support that option because it does not address the immediate or long-term goal and hinders other businesses already created. Councilmember Brausen replied that is why he suggested a Conditional Use Permit because one size doesn’t fit all. Councilmember Mavity stated she does not want create additional hoops for small businesses to jump through. Mr. Harmening asked the Council for definition and to think about what adding a Conditional Use Permit process for this type of use would accomplish. It was moved by Councilmember Mavity, seconded by Councilmember Miller, to approve the First Reading of an Ordinance amending the zoning ordinance relating to distilleries and cocktail rooms, and to set the second reading for April 4, 2016. The motion passed 6-1. (Councilmember Brausen opposed.) 8f. 2016 - 2017 Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc (LELS) Local #220 (Public Safety Dispatchers) Labor Agreement. Resolution No. 16-049 Ms. Deno presented the staff report regarding the 2016 - 2017 Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc (LELS) Local #220 (Public Safety Dispatchers) Labor Agreement. This agreement includes two years of wages and this pattern mirrors the contract with the City’s maintenance group. It was moved by Councilmember Sanger, seconded by Councilmember Lindberg, to adopt Resolution No. 16-049, approving a Labor Agreement between the City and Dispatch Union, establishing terms and conditions of employment for two years, from 1/1/16 – 12/31/17. 9. Communications In response to Councilmember Sanger’s question about the start date for yard waste pickup, Ms. Deno responded April 4, 2016. Councilmember Miller stated that Maggie’s Farm Theater is opening a new show in a few weeks at the Lenox Little Theater called True West. In addition, the library is offering a program on Thursday night called “Dialogues in the Park,” which is a community forum about issues to improve opportunity and prosperity. City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 3b) Page 11 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of March 21, 2016 10. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 9:40 p.m. ______________________________________ _____________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Jake Spano, Mayor Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 18, 2016 Consent Agenda Item: 4a EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Special Assessment - Water Service Line Repair at 3341 Glenhurst Avenue South RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution authorizing the special assessment for the repair of the water service line at 3341 Glenhurst Avenue South, St. Louis Park, MN. P.I.D. 06-028-24-14-0079. POLICY CONSIDERATION: The proposed action is consistent with policy previously established by the City Council. SUMMARY: Patrick Griswold and Dina Adams, owners of the single family residence at 3341 Glenhurst Avenue South, have requested the City to authorize the repair of the water service line for their home and assess the cost against the property in accordance with the City’s special assessment policy. This is a repair that was made between the home and the curb box and is not impacted by the City’s new waterline ownership policy. Homeowners are still responsible for water lines repairs that occur between their home and the curb box located in the right of way. The City requires the repair of service lines to promote the general public health, safety and welfare within the community. The special assessment policy for the repair or replacement of water or sewer service lines for existing homes was adopted by the City Council in 1996. This program was put into place because sometimes property owners face financial hardships when emergency repairs like this are unexpectedly required. Plans and permits for this service line repair work were completed, submitted, and approved by City staff. The property owners hired a contractor and repaired the water service line in compliance with current codes and regulations. Based on the completed work, this repair qualifies for the City’s special assessment program. The property owners have petitioned the City to authorize the water service line repair and special assess the cost of the repair. The total eligible cost of the repair has been determined to be $2,770.00. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The City has funds in place to finance the cost of this special assessment. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution Prepared by: Jay Hall, Utility Superintendent Reviewed by: Mark Hanson, Public Works Superintendent Patricia A. Sulander, Accountant Cindy Walsh, Director of Operations and Recreation Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Page 2 Title: Special Assessment - Water Service Line Repair at 3341 Glenhurst Avenue South RESOLUTION NO. 16-____ RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE REPAIR OF THE WATER SERVICE LINE AT 3341 GLENHURST AVENUE SOUTH, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN P.I.D. 06-028-24-14-0079 WHEREAS, the Property Owners at 3341 Glenhurst Avenue South, have petitioned the City of St. Louis Park to authorize a special assessment for the repair of the water service line for the single family residence located at 3341 Glenhurst Avenue South, and WHEREAS, the Property Owners have agreed to waive the right to a public hearing, right of notice and right of appeal pursuant to Minnesota Statute, Chapter 429; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park has received a report from the Utility Superintendent related to the repair of the water service line. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, that: 1. The petition from the Property Owners requesting the approval and special assessment for the water service line repair is hereby accepted. 2. The water service line repair that was done in conformance with the plans and specifications approved by the Public Works Department and Department of Inspections is hereby accepted. 3. The total cost for the repair of the water service line is accepted at $2,770.00. 4. The Property Owners have agreed to waive the right to a public hearing, notice and appeal from the special assessment; whether provided by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, or by other statutes, or by ordinance, City Charter, the constitution, or common law. 5. The Property Owners have agreed to pay the City for the total cost of the above improvements through a special assessment over a ten (10) year period at the interest rate of 4.00%. 6. The Property Owners have executed an agreement with the City and all other documents necessary to implement the repair of the water service line and the special assessment of all costs associated therewith. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council April 18, 2016 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 18, 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Second Reading of Ordinance to Amend the Zoning Map 2460 Hwy 100 – New Horizons Academy RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: Motion to approve second reading and Adopt Ordinance amending the zoning map, and approve the summary ordinance for publication. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council support amending the zoning map to change the zoning designation of 2460 Highway 100 from “Office” to “C-1 Neighborhood Commercial”? SUMMARY: New Horizon Academy (Applicant), intends to purchase the property to open and operate a daycare facility. The Office zoning district does not permit a daycare as a principal use, therefore, the Applicant requested changing the zoning of the property to C-1 Neighborhood Commercial. The request required the following actions which were approved by the Council on April 4, 2016: 1. Amend the Comprehensive Plan to change the land use map from Office to Commercial. 2. First reading to amend the zoning map to rezone the property from Office to C-1 Neighborhood Commercial. 3. Approve a variance to the C-1 Neighborhood Commercial requirement that a daycare’s outdoor play area be located at least 200 feet from a roadway defined as a principal arterial. The Council’s approval of the Comprehensive Plan amendment and the variance do not require further action. The decision to approve the zoning map amendment, however, requires a second reading and adoption. If approved, the ordinance will take effect on May 13, 2016. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Excerpt of Zoning Map Zoning Ordinance Summary of Ordinance for Publication Prepared by: Gary Morrison, Assistant Zoning Administrator Reviewed by: Sean Walther, Planning & Zoning Supervisor Michele Schnitker, Housing Supervisor/Deputy CD Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Consent Agenda Item: 4b City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 4b) Page 2 Title: Second Reading of Ordinance to Amend the Zoning Map 2460 Hwy 100 – New Horizons Academy EXCERPT OF ZONING MAP City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 4b) Page 3 Title: Second Reading of Ordinance to Amend the Zoning Map 2460 Hwy 100 – New Horizons Academy ORDINANCE NO.____-16 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ST. LOUIS PARK ORDINANCE CODE CHANGING BOUNDARIES OF ZONING DISTRICTS 2460 STATE HIGHWAY 100 THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK DOES ORDAIN: Section 1. The City Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission (Case No. 16-08-Z). Section 2. The St. Louis Park Zoning Ordinance is hereby further amended by changing the zoning district boundaries by reclassifying the following described lands from O Office to C-1 Neighborhood Commercial: Lot 4, Block 1, RIDGE ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, EXCEPTING THEREFROM, that part of Lot 4, Block 1, RIDGE ADDITION, conveyed in fee to the State of Minnesota by deed dated February 9, 1987, recorded April 10, 1987, as Document No. 5251461. (Abstract Property) Section 3. The contents of Planning Case File 16-08-Z are hereby entered into and made part of the public hearing record and the record of decision for this case. Section 4. The ordinance shall take effect upon Metropolitan Council approval of associated Comprehensive Plan amendment, and not less than 15 days after publication. Public Hearing March 2, 2016 First Reading April 4, 2016 Second Reading April 18, 2016 Date of Publication April 28, 2016 Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council April 18, 2016 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Approved as to Form and Execution: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Soren Mattick, City Attorney City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 4b) Page 4 Title: Second Reading of Ordinance to Amend the Zoning Map 2460 Hwy 100 – New Horizons Academy SUMMARY FOR PUBLICATION ORDINANCE NO.____-16 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ST. LOUIS PARK ORDINANCE CODE CHANGING BOUNDARIES OF ZONING DISTRICTS 2460 STATE HIGHWAY 100 This ordinance states that the zoning district of 2460 State Highway 100 will be changed from O Office to C-1 Neighborhood Commercial. This ordinance shall take effect upon Metropolitan Council approval of associated Comprehensive Plan amendment, and not less than 15 days after publication. Adopted by the City Council April 18, 2016 Jake Spano /s/ Mayor A copy of the full text of this ordinance is available for inspection with the City Clerk. Published in St. Louis Park Sailor: April 28, 2016 Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 18, 2016 Consent Agenda Item: 4c EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Bid Tabulation: Sanitary Sewer Main Rehab Project No. 4016-3000 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to designate Visu-Sewer, Inc. as the lowest responsible bidder and authorize execution of a contract with the firm in the amount of $264,874.30 for the Sanitary Sewer Main Rehab Project #4016-3000. POLICY CONSIDERATION: None SUMMARY: A total of four (4) bids were received for this project. A summary of the bid results is as follows: CONTRACTOR BID AMOUNT Visu-Sewer, Inc. $264,874.30 Hydro-Klean, LLC $301,204.20 Lametti & Sons, Inc. $350,936.00 SAK Construction $304,084.00 Engineer’s Estimate $326,396.00 A review of the bids indicates Visu-Sewer Inc. submitted the lowest bid. Visu-Sewer is a reputable contractor that has successfully completed worked for the City before. Staff recommends that a contract be awarded to the firm in the amount of $264,874.30. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: This project was planned for and included in the City’s adopted Capital Improvement Program. This project is paid for using Sanitary Sewer Utility Funds. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not Applicable SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion Prepared by: Phillip Elkin, Senior Engineering Project Manager Reviewed by: Debra M. Heiser, Engineering Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 4c) Page 2 Title: Bid Tabulation: Sanitary Sewer Main Rehab Project No. 4016-3000 DISCUSSION BACKGROUND: The City has a program to routinely video inspect the sewer system. Video inspection has revealed structural defects in various lines. Due to structural defects, infiltration, sewer blockages (backups), or line collapse may occur. To address these structural defects, before they lead to the problems described above, the city’s Capital Improvement Plan includes annual funding for a sanitary sewer main lining program. Lining can extend the life of our sanitary sewers by 50 years or more. This technology, called cured-in-place pipe (CIPP) renewal, installs a new resin pipe inside the old clay tile sewer main without digging up city streets, which results in minimal disruption to residents during construction. The liner pipe is inserted into the main through existing manholes and cured in place with a heat or steam process. Any given segment is usually completed in one working day. Service line connections are reopened using a robotic cutter and remote cameras. During the process, existing flows are bypassed using pumps. Project 4016-3000 includes lining of 13,213 feet of sanitary sewer mains at a number of streets in the following neighborhoods; Sorenson, Minnehaha, Bronx Park, Crestview, Creekside and Aquila, Neighborhoods. An advertisement for bids was published in the St. Louis Park Sun-Sailor on March 3, 2016. In addition, plans and specifications are noticed on the City Website and are made available electronically via the internet by our vendor Quest CDN.com. Email notification was provided to five minority associations and final printed plans were available for viewing at iSqFt and The Blue Book Building & Construction Network Planrooms and at City Hall. Construction Timeline Construction is tentatively planned to begin late April and should be completed by late June. Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 18, 2016 Consent Agenda Item: 4d EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Bid Tabulation: Street Maintenance Project – Sealcoat Streets in Pavement Management Area 1– Project No. 4016-1200 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to designate Allied Blacktop Co. the lowest responsible bidder and authorize execution of a contract with the firm in the amount of $360,172.79 for Street Maintenance Project (Sealcoat Streets-Area 1– Project No. 4016-1200). POLICY CONSIDERATION: Not applicable SUMMARY: A total of two (2) bids were received for this project. A summary of the bid results is as follows: CONTRACTOR BID AMOUNT Allied Blacktop Company $360,172.79 Pearson Brothers Inc. $381,954.25 Engineer’s Estimate $447,886.25 A review of the bids indicates Allied Blacktop Co. submitted the lowest bid. Allied Blacktop is a reputable contractor that has worked for the City before. Staff recommends that a contract be awarded to the firm in the amount of $360,172.79. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: This project was planned for and included in the City’s adopted Capital Improvement Program. The engineer’s estimate was $447,886.25. The expense for sealcoating the local streets will be paid from the City’s Pavement Management Fund and Municipal State Aid streets are paid for out of the Operations budget. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion Seal Coat 2016 Map Prepared by: Phillip Elkin, Sr. Engineering Project Manager Reviewed by: Debra M. Heiser, Engineering Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 4d) Page 2 Title: Bid Tabulation: Street Maintenance Project – Sealcoat Streets in Area 1– Project No. 4016-1200 DISCUSSION BACKGROUND: Sealcoating is the surface application of an asphalt material followed by the placement of aggregate (rock) which is embedded into the asphalt material while it is liquid. The purpose of this treatment is to add surface friction to the pavement, to seal the surface from oxidation and protect the pavements from the effects of moisture. Sealcoating can extend the life of a pavement, in good condition, by 5-9 years. The City’s Pavement Management Program provides for the sealcoating of each street once every eight (8) years. This year’s sealcoat project includes Area 1 of the Pavement Management Program and two streets from last year’s project which were skipped due to construction. These streets were last sealcoated in 2009. These areas comprise the streets in the Lenox, Oak Hill, Texa Tonka, Cobble Crest and Eliot View neighborhoods. Maps of the streets to be sealcoated are attached. Based on the City’s pavement management software and visual inspections by City staff, some streets in these areas were determined to be in need of more comprehensive maintenance and would not benefit from sealcoating. Thus, they have been eliminated from this project with the understanding that they will be programmed for rehabilitation in the future, as part of the City’s overall Pavement Management Program. An advertisement for bids was published in the St. Louis Park Sun-Sailor on March 17. In addition, plans and specifications were noticed on the City Website and are made available electronically via the internet by our vendor QuestCDN.com. Email notification was provided to five minority associations and final printed plans are made available for viewing at City Hall. Funding Details: Based on the low bid received, total project cost and funding details are revised as follows: Expenditures Construction Cost $360,172.79 Revenues Pavement Management Fund $315,784.79 PW Operations Budget $44,388.00 Total $360,172.79 This project was planned for and included in the City’s adopted Capital Improvement Program. Construction Timeline: The work may begin as early as June but must be completed no later than August 30. The contractor will schedule a week to complete the work within this time frame. Streets will be posted for “No Parking” beginning the day before work is to occur. Staff will send a notice out to residents once we get a schedule to inform them of the pending work and parking restrictions. ")5 ¬«100 ¬«7 ALABAMA29TH TEXASDAKOTAVERNON32ND SERVICE DR H IG H W A Y 7 36THW O O D D A L E XENWOODLOUIS IANA 28TH 33RD ZARTHANLAKE WALKER LAKEWALKERGEORGIA22ND DAKOTAWALKERJERSEYIDAHO18TH26TH RHODE ISLANDAQUILA34TH 33RD GORHAM 31ST 35TH LIB R A R YZINRANFRANKLIN 36TH 35THBOONE 29TH 28TH 27THBURD WYOMING33RD 26TH WYOMING31STSUMTER 32ND 32ND 33RD FRANKLIN 18TH 32ND 24TH 32 1/2 25 1/2 XENWOODS E R V IC E D R H IG H W A Y 737TH RE P U B L I C 29TH 30 1/2 26TH YUKONALABAMA36TH 37THUTAH34 1/2VIRGINIABOONE SUMTER18TH24THGEORGIA22ND 23RDBR O W N L O W 23RD WEBSTERYOSEMITE31ST QUEBECQUEBECZINRANXYLONYUKONOREGONNEVADAEDGEWOODHAMPSHIRECAVELLFLORIDAPENNSYLVANIAIDAHOCAVELLMARYLANDYOSEMITEXYLONUTAHNEVADARHODEISLANDVIRG IN IA 37TH C A V E L L PRIVATESUMTERXYLONK N O L LW O O DMALLACCES LOUISIANATEXASPARKPLACEVIRGINIA VIRGINIA ID A H OKENTUCKY25TH 2NDOREGONAQUILACOLORADOB O O N E 25TH VIRGINIARIDGERIDGEEDGEWOODBRUNSWICKR H O D E IS L A N D ELIO TVIEW BRUNSWICKKENTUCKYAQUILAUTAHJERSEYBLACKSTONEALABAMACAVELLUTAHVICTORIA 28TH ² 0 530 1,060 1,590 2,120 Feet 2016 Seal Coat (Area 1) City Council Meeting of April 18, 2015 (Item No. 4d) Title: Bid Tabulation: Street Maintenance Project – Sealcoat Streets in Area 1– Project No. 4016-1200 Page 3 Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 18, 2016 Consent Agenda Item: 4e EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Temporary On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for the Heilicher Minneapolis Jewish Day School RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Approve a Temporary On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for the Heilicher Minneapolis Jewish Day School for an event to be held on May 24, 2016, at the Sabes Jewish Community Center, 4330 Cedar Lake Road in St. Louis Park. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the applicant meet all of the requirements for obtaining a Temporary On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License? SUMMARY: The Heilicher Minneapolis Jewish Day School has applied for a Temporary Liquor License for a 6:00 pm reception prior to their Annual Meeting to be held on Tuesday, May 24, in the Tychman Shapiro Gallery at the Sabes Jewish Community Center at 4330 Cedar Lake Road. The reception is to recognize and thank the donors to the school. The mission of HMJDS is to provide a positive environment focused on a strong academic foundation in Jewish and General Studies. The Police Department has completed the background investigation on the principals and has found no reason to deny the temporary license. The applicant has met all requirements for issuance of the license, and staff is recommending approval. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The fee for a temporary liquor license is $100.00 per day of the event. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: None Prepared by: Kay Midura, Office Assistant – City Clerk’s Office Reviewed by: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 18, 2016 Consent Agenda Item: 4f EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Appointment of Representative to the Community Education Advisory Commission RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to appoint Thom Miller as a City Council Representative to the Community Education Advisory Commission for a term expiring May 31, 2019. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Not applicable SUMMARY: Councilmember Miller has volunteered to serve on CEAC as City Council Representative. He will replace Councilmember Brausen. Councilmember Lindberg also represents the City Council on CEAC FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged community. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: None. Prepared by: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 18, 2016 Consent Agenda Item: 4g EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Purchase Agreement – 40th St. and France Ave. Property RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to execute a purchase agreement for approximately 4.77 acres of property owned by the City of Minneapolis located at 40th St. and France Ave. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Will the purchase of this property help further the goals and priorities of the City? SUMMARY: The City of Minneapolis owns approximately 14.54 acres of property located directly south and west of 40th St. and France Ave. Approximately 4.77 acres is located in St. Louis Park and 9.77 acres in Edina. Approximately one half of the subject property in St. Louis Park is used for Minikahda Vista Park, which has been allowed under a lease agreement with Minneapolis for many years. In 2013 the City of Minneapolis informed St. Louis Park and Edina that the property was being declared excess with the intention of it being sold. Discussions have been ongoing since that time along with appraisals, environmental analysis, the exchange of offers, and City Council discussions. On March 21, 2016 the City Council reviewed a final draft of a purchase agreement and indicated it was found to be acceptable. The terms of the purchase agreement, which are the same as shared with the Council on March 21, include:  Purchase Price - $609,813 payable in cash at closing  Use Restrictions – With the exception of the terms of a non-exclusive utility and access easement which Minneapolis will hold for the existing pumping station, there are no restrictions on the City’s use or development of this property (subject to usual and customary St. Louis Park city code requirements).  Closing Costs – Being split in the usual and customary manner.  Other Considerations – The sale is contingent on Minneapolis entering into a purchase agreement with the City of Edina and that the closing for both transactions are done simultaneously. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The proceeds for this purchase will come from the Park Improvement Fund. $627,000 was budgeted with the actual expenditure being $609,813. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution & Purchase Agreement Site Map Prepared by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 4g) Title: Purchase Agreement – 40th St. and France Ave. Property Page 2 City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 4g) Title: Purchase Agreement – 40th St. and France Ave. Property Page 3 City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 4g) Title: Purchase Agreement – 40th St. and France Ave. Property Page 4 City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 4g) Title: Purchase Agreement – 40th St. and France Ave. Property Page 5 City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 4g) Title: Purchase Agreement – 40th St. and France Ave. Property Page 6 City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 4g) Title: Purchase Agreement – 40th St. and France Ave. Property Page 7 City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 4g) Title: Purchase Agreement – 40th St. and France Ave. Property Page 8 City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 4g) Title: Purchase Agreement – 40th St. and France Ave. Property Page 9 City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 4g) Title: Purchase Agreement – 40th St. and France Ave. Property Page 10 City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 4g) Title: Purchase Agreement – 40th St. and France Ave. Property Page 11 City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 4g) Title: Purchase Agreement – 40th St. and France Ave. Property Page 12 City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 4g) Title: Purchase Agreement – 40th St. and France Ave. Property Page 13 City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 4g) Title: Purchase Agreement – 40th St. and France Ave. Property Page 14 City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 4g) Title: Purchase Agreement – 40th St. and France Ave. Property Page 15 City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 4g) Title: Purchase Agreement – 40th St. and France Ave. Property Page 16 City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 4g) Title: Purchase Agreement – 40th St. and France Ave. Property Page 17 City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 4g) Title: Purchase Agreement – 40th St. and France Ave. Property Page 18 City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 4g) Title: Purchase Agreement – 40th St. and France Ave. Property Page 19 City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 4g) Title: Purchase Agreement – 40th St. and France Ave. Property Page 20 City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 4g) Title: Purchase Agreement – 40th St. and France Ave. Property Page 21 City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 4g) Title: Purchase Agreement – 40th St. and France Ave. Property Page 22 City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 4g) Title: Purchase Agreement – 40th St. and France Ave. Property Page 23 EWING AVE SFRANCE AVE S41ST ST W 40TH ST W 39TH ST W INGLEWOOD AVE39TH ST W FRANCE AVE SINGLEWOOD AVE S1 inch = 200 feet Legend Parcels City Boundaries ¯ Minneapolis Land at 40th St W & France Av S Calvin Christian School Weber Park Weber ParkPond Subject Property St. Louis Park Edina St. Louis ParkMinneapolisEdinaMinneapolis3940 France Ave S 07-028-24-11-0001 Minikahda Vista Park City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 4g) Title: Purchase Agreement – 40th St. and France Ave. Property Page 24 Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 18, 2016 Public Hearing Agenda Item: 6a EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Mount Olivet Private Activity Revenue Bonds RECOMMENDED ACTION: Mayor to close public hearing. Motion to Adopt Resolution authorizing issuance of Health Care Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds for Mount-Olivet. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Should the City waive its requirements that bonds be issued in $100,000 increments? All other components of this bond issue are in compliance with the City’s policy. SUMMARY: Mount Olivet Residence owns and operates a 94-bed boarding care facility (the “Care Facility”) and a 153-bed licensed skilled nursing facility (the “Skilled Nursing Facility”) located in Minneapolis. Mount Olivet issued private activity revenue bonds in 2011 through the City of Minneapolis for its health care facility. The 2016 Bonds will refinance the 2011 Bonds, as well as provide financing for a 36,000 square foot addition to the Skilled Nursing Facility. Mount Olivet would like to market the Bonds in $5,000 denominations because many of their members and supporters would like to buy the Bonds. Therefore, Mount Olivet is asking that the City waive its requirement that Bonds must be issued in $100,000 increments. Doing so does not add any additional burden to staff or the City of St. Louis Park. The City of Minneapolis has a policy that requires bonds be issued in $25,000 denominations and would not waive this requirement; therefore Mount Olivet has approached the City of St. Louis Park. The City of Minneapolis granted the host approval on April 1, 2016. The Series 2016 Bonds, will be issued in the amount not to exceed $33,000,000. NEXT STEPS: Pending Council approval, the bonds will close within several weeks of Council approval. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Per the City’s private activity revenue bond policy, Mount Olivet will pay an annual administration fee in the amount of 1/8th of 1% (.125%) of the outstanding principal of the bonds. This amounts to approximately $700,000 over the 33 year life of the bonds. The City uses this administration fee in the Housing Rehabilitation Fund. It is important to note that the City holds no responsibility to repay any portion of these bonds VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution Prepared by: Coty Hemann, Accountant Reviewed by: Steven Heintz, Interim Controller Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 6a) Page 2 Title: Mount Olivet Private Activity Revenue Bonds CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 16-____ AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE, SALE, AND DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE FACILITIES REVENUES BONDS; APPROVING THE FORMS OF AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF THE BONDS AND RELATED DOCUMENTS; AND GRANTING APPROVAL FOR CERTAIN OTHER ACTIONS WITH RESPECT THERETO Section 1. Recitals. 1.01. The City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota (the “City”) is a home rule city duly organized and existing under its City Charter and the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota. 1.02. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.152 through 469.1655, as amended (the “Act”), the City is authorized to issue revenue bonds to finance, in whole or in part, the cost of the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, improvement, betterment or extension of a project, defined in the Act as any properties, real or personal, used or useful in connection with a revenue producing enterprise, whether or not operated for profit, engaged in providing health care services, including hospitals, nursing homes, and related medical facilities. 1.03. Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.656, authorizes a municipality to issue obligations to finance the acquisition or improvement of property located outside of the corporate boundaries of such municipality if the obligations are issued under a joint powers agreement between the municipality issuing the obligations and the municipality in which the property to be acquired or improved is located. 1.04. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59, by the terms of a joint powers agreement entered into through action of their governing bodies, two municipalities may jointly or cooperatively exercise any power common to the contracting parties or any similar powers, including those which are the same except for the territorial limits within which they may be exercised and the joint powers agreement may provide for the exercise of such powers by one or more of the participating governmental units on behalf of the other participating units. 1.05. Mount Olivet Home, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation (“Mount Olivet Home”), and Mount Olivet Careview Home, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation (“Mount Olivet Careview Home,” and together with Mount Olivet Home, the “Borrower”), have requested that the City issue its revenue bonds, in one or more series, as taxable or tax-exempt obligations, in the aggregate principal amount not to exceed $33,000,000 (the “Bonds”). 1.06. The proceeds of the Bonds are proposed to be loaned by the City to the Borrower for the purposes of (i) refinancing the Mount Olivet Home, a 94-bed boarding care facility (the “Care Facility”) located at 5517 Lyndale Avenue South in the City of Minneapolis (the “City of Minneapolis”) through the redemption and prepayment of the outstanding Revenue Bond (Mount Olivet Home Project), Series 2011 (the “Prior Bond”), issued by the Minneapolis Community City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 6a) Page 3 Title: Mount Olivet Private Activity Revenue Bonds Development Agency (the “MCDA”) in the original aggregate principal amount of $5,971,000; (ii) financing the acquisition, construction, and equipping of a new 36,000 square foot addition to the Mount Olivet Careview Home, a 153-bed licensed skilled nursing facility (the “Skilled Nursing Facility,” and together with the Care Facility, the “Facilities”) located at 603 West 55th Street in the City of Minneapolis; (iii) financing the remodeling of approximately 51,000 square feet of the existing Skilled Nursing Facility; (iv) funding debt service reserve funds; (v) financing capitalized interest during the construction of the addition to and remodeling of the Skilled Nursing Facility (collectively, the “Expansion Project”); and (vi) paying costs of issuance of the Bonds. 1.07. The Care Facility is owned and operated by Mount Olivet Home, and the Skilled Nursing Facility is owned and operated by Mount Olivet Careview Home. Both Mount Olivet Home and Mount Olivet Careview Home have represented to the City that they are exempt from federal income taxation under Section 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), as a result of the application of Section 501(c)(3) of the Code. 1.08. The Prior Bond was issued by the MCDA on April 29, 2011, pursuant to the Act. The MCDA loaned the proceeds of the Prior Bond to Mount Olivet Home under a Loan Agreement, dated April 29, 2011 (the “Prior Loan Agreement”), between the MCDA and Mount Olivet Home. Mount Olivet Home applied the proceeds of the Prior Bond to refinance the Care Facility through the redemption and prepayment of the Health Care Facilities Revenue Bonds (Mount Olivet Home Project), Series 2003, issued by the City of Minneapolis. The obligations of Mount Olivet Home to make payments under the Prior Loan Agreement were secured by a Mortgage, Security Agreement, Assignment of Rents and Leases and Fixture Financing Statement, dated April 29, 2011 (the “Original Mortgage”), from Mount Olivet Home to Venture Bank, as the holder of the Prior Bond. 1.09. The City and the City of Minneapolis are proposing to enter into a Cooperative Agreement, to be dated on or after April 1, 2016 (the “Cooperative Agreement”), pursuant to which the City of Minneapolis will consent to the issuance of the Bonds by the City to refinance the Care Facility and to finance the Expansion Project, and the City will agree to issue the Bonds to refinance the Care Facility and to finance the Expansion Project. 1.10. In accordance with Section 469.154 of the Act, the City has prepared an application to the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development (“DEED”) for approval of the Expansion Project. 1.11. Prior to the issuance of the Bonds, the City Council of the City must conduct a public hearing to (i) approve the issuance of the Bonds pursuant to the requirements of Section 147(f) of the Code; and (ii) approve the Expansion Project pursuant to Section 469.154, subdivision 4 of the Act. 1.12. A notice of public hearing (the “Public Notice”) was published at least fourteen (14) days before this regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council of the City in the Sun-Sailor, the official newspaper of and a newspaper of general circulation in the City, with respect to the required public hearing under Section 147(f) of the Code and the Act. 1.13. On the date hereof, the City Council conducted a public hearing at which a reasonable opportunity was provided for interested individuals to express their views, both orally and in writing on the following: (i) approval of the issuance of the Bonds pursuant to the City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 6a) Page 4 Title: Mount Olivet Private Activity Revenue Bonds requirements of Section 147(f) of the Code and the regulations promulgated thereunder; and (ii) approval of the issuance of the Bonds and approval of the Expansion Project pursuant to the requirements of the Act. Section 2. Series 2016A Bonds. 2.01. The Borrower has requested that the City issue, sell, and deliver its Health Care Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds (Mount Olivet Home Project), Series 2016A (the “Series 2016A Bonds”), in an aggregate principal amount of approximately $4,350,000. The Series 2016A Bonds are proposed to be sold publicly and underwritten by Northland Securities, Inc. (the “Underwriter”). 2.02. The Series 2016A Bonds are proposed to be issued pursuant to this resolution, the Act, Minnesota Statutes, Sections 471.59 and 471.656, as amended (the “Joint Powers Act”), and an Indenture of Trust, to be dated on or after April 1, 2016 (the “Series 2016A Indenture”), between the City and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (the “Trustee”). The Series 2016A Bonds and the interest thereon (i) shall be payable solely from the revenues pledged therefor under the Amended and Restated Loan Agreement, to be dated or on after April 1, 2016 (the “Series 2016A Loan Agreement”), between the City and the Borrower, which amends and restates the Prior Loan Agreement, and additional sources of revenue provided by or on behalf of the Borrower; (ii) shall not constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation; (iii) shall not constitute or give rise to a pecuniary liability of the City or a charge against its general credit or taxing powers; (iv) shall not constitute a charge, lien, or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the City other than the City’s interest in the Series 2016A Loan Agreement; and (v) shall not constitute a general or moral obligation of the City. 2.03. The proceeds derived from the sale of the Series 2016A Bonds will be loaned by the City to the Borrower pursuant to the Series 2016A Loan Agreement and will be applied, along with available funds of the Borrower, to (i) refinance the Care Facility through redemption and prepayment of the Prior Bond; (ii) finance a debt service reserve fund; and (iii) pay costs of issuance of the Series 2016A Bonds. The proceeds will be disbursed in accordance with the Series 2016A Indenture and the Series 2016A Loan Agreement. 2.04. The loan repayments to be made by the Borrower under the Series 2016A Loan Agreement will be fixed so as to produce revenue sufficient to pay the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Series 2016A Bonds when due. Such loan repayments will be assigned to the Trustee under the terms of the Series 2016A Indenture. The Borrower will secure its obligations by executing an Amended and Restated Combination Mortgage, Security Agreement, Assignment of Rents and Leases, and Fixture Financing Statement, to be dated on or after April 1, 2016 (the “Series 2016A Mortgage”), between the Borrower and the Trustee, which amends and restates the Prior Mortgage. Additionally, Mount Olivet Home Foundation, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (“Mount Olivet Home Foundation”), and Mount Olivet Careview Home Foundation, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (“Mount Olivet Careview Foundation,” and together with Mount Olivet Home Foundation, the “Guarantor”), will jointly and severally agree to replenish draws on the debt service reserve fund established for the Series 2016A Bonds subject to certain conditions as provided in a Limited Guaranty Agreement, to be dated on or after April 1, 2016 (the “Series 2016A Guaranty”), by the Guarantor in favor of the Trustee. City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 6a) Page 5 Title: Mount Olivet Private Activity Revenue Bonds 2.05. The City acknowledges, finds, determines, and declares that the issuance of the Series 2016A Bonds is authorized by the Act and is consistent with the purposes of the Act and that the issuance of the Series 2016A Bonds, and the other actions of the City under the Series 2016A Indenture, the Series 2016A Loan Agreement, and this resolution constitute a public purpose and are in the interests of the City. 2.06. For the purposes set forth above, there is hereby authorized the issuance, sale, and delivery of the Series 2016A Bonds in the approximate aggregate principal amount of $4,350,000. The Series 2016A Bonds shall bear interest at the rates, shall be designated, shall be numbered, shall be dated, shall mature, shall be in the aggregate principal amount, shall be subject to redemption prior to maturity, shall be in such form, and shall have such other terms, details, and provisions as are prescribed in the Series 2016A Indenture, substantially in the form now on file with the City, with the amendments referenced herein. The City hereby authorizes the Series 2016A Bonds to be issued, in whole or in part, as “tax-exempt bonds,” the interest on which is not includable in gross income for federal and State of Minnesota income tax purposes. All of the provisions of the Series 2016A Bonds, when executed as authorized herein, shall be deemed to be a part of this resolution as fully and to the same extent as if incorporated verbatim herein and shall be in full force and effect from the date of execution and delivery thereof. The Series 2016A Bonds shall be substantially in the form in the Series 2016A Indenture on file with the City, which form is hereby approved, with such necessary and appropriate variations, omissions, and insertions (including changes to the aggregate principal amount of the Series 2016A Bonds, the stated maturities of the Series 2016A Bonds, the interest rates on the Series 2016A Bonds and the terms of redemption of the Series 2016A Bonds) as the Mayor and the City Manager, in their discretion, shall determine. The execution of the Series 2016A Bonds with the manual or facsimile signatures of the Mayor and the City Manager and the delivery of the Series 2016A Bonds by the City shall be conclusive evidence of such determination. 2.07. The Series 2016A Bonds shall be special, limited obligations of the City payable solely from the revenues provided by the Borrower pursuant to the Series 2016A Loan Agreement, including revenues of the Facilities, and other funds pledged pursuant to the Series 2016A Indenture. All of the provisions of the Series 2016A Indenture, when executed as authorized herein, shall be deemed to be a part of this resolution as fully and to the same extent as if incorporated verbatim herein and shall be in full force and effect from the date of execution and delivery thereof. The Series 2016A Indenture shall be substantially in the form on file with the City, which is hereby approved, with such necessary and appropriate variations, omissions and insertions as do not materially change the substance thereof, and as the Mayor and the City Manager, in their discretion, shall determine, and the execution thereof by the Mayor and the City Manager shall be conclusive evidence of such determination. The Mayor and the City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to execute the Series 2016A Indenture, and to deliver the Series 2016A Indenture to the Trustee, and are hereby authorized and directed to execute the Series 2016A Bonds in accordance with the terms of the Series 2016A Indenture. The Series 2016A Indenture shall provide the terms and conditions, covenants, rights, obligations, duties, and agreements of the owners of the Series 2016A Bonds, the City and the Trustee as set forth therein. 2.08. The Mayor and the City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver the Series 2016A Loan Agreement and the Bond Purchase Agreement, to be dated after the City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 6a) Page 6 Title: Mount Olivet Private Activity Revenue Bonds date hereof (the “Series 2016A Bond Purchase Agreement”), between the City, the Borrower, and the Underwriter, with respect to the sale and purchase of the Series 2016A Bonds. All of the provisions of the Series 2016A Loan Agreement and Series 2016A Bond Purchase Agreement, when executed and delivered as authorized herein, shall be deemed to be a part of this resolution as fully and to the same extent as if incorporated verbatim herein and shall be in full force and effect from the date of execution and delivery thereof. The Series 2016A Loan Agreement and Series 2016A Bond Purchase Agreement shall be substantially in the forms on file with the City, which are hereby approved, with such omissions and insertions as do not materially change the substance thereof, and as the Mayor and the City Manager, in their discretion, shall determine, and the execution thereof by the Mayor and the City Manager shall be conclusive evidence of such determinations. 2.09. The Mayor, the City Manager, and the Controller of the City are hereby authorized to execute and deliver, on behalf of the City, such other documents and certificates as are necessary or appropriate in connection with the issuance, sale, and delivery of the Series 2016A Bonds, including various certificates of the City, an Information Return for Tax-Exempt Private Activity Bond Issues, Form 8038 (Rev. April 2011), an endorsement of the City to the tax certificate of the Borrower, and similar documents. The City hereby approves the execution and delivery by the Trustee of the Series 2016A Indenture, the Series 2016A Mortgage, and all other instruments, certificates, and documents prepared in conjunction with the issuance of the Series 2016A Bonds that require execution by the Trustee. The City hereby authorizes Bond Counsel to prepare, execute, and deliver its approving legal opinion with respect to the Series 2016A Bonds. 2.10. The City hereby authorizes the Borrower to provide such security for payment of its obligations under the Series 2016A Loan Agreement and for payment of the Series 2016A Bonds, including the Series 2016A Mortgage, the Series 2016A Guaranty, or any other security agreed upon by the Borrower, and the City hereby approves the execution and delivery of such security. 2.11. The City authorizes the issuance of the Series 2016A Bonds as obligations that are deemed designated as “qualified tax-exempt obligations” within the meaning of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code, based on the bank-qualified nature of the Prior Bond to be refunded by the Series 2016A Bonds. Section 3. Series 2016B Bonds and Series 2016C Bonds. 3.01. The Borrower has requested that the City issue, sell, and deliver its (i) Health Care Facilities Revenue Bonds (Mount Olivet Careview Home Project), Series 2016B (the “Series 2016B Bonds”), in an aggregate principal amount of approximately $21,015,000; and (ii) Health Care Facilities Revenue Bonds (Mount Olivet Careview Home Project), Series 2016C (the “Series 2016C Bonds”), in an aggregate principal amount of approximately $5,460,000. The Series 2016B Bonds and the Series 2016C Bonds are proposed to be sold publicly and underwritten by the Underwriter. 3.02. The Series 2016B Bonds and the Series 2016C Bonds are proposed to be issued pursuant to this resolution, the Act, the Joint Powers Act, and an Indenture of Trust, to be dated on or after April 1, 2016 (the “Series 2016BC Indenture”), between the City and the Trustee, and will be issued on a parity with the Series 2016A Bonds. The Series 2016B Bonds and the Series 2016C Bonds and the interest thereon (i) shall be payable solely, on a parity basis with the Series City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 6a) Page 7 Title: Mount Olivet Private Activity Revenue Bonds 2016A Bonds and the Series 2016A Loan Agreement, from the revenues pledged therefor under the Loan Agreement, to be dated or on after April 1, 2016 (the “Series 2016BC Loan Agreement”), between the City and the Borrower, and additional sources of revenue provided by or on behalf of the Borrower; (ii) shall not constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation; (iii) shall not constitute nor give rise to a pecuniary liability of the City or a charge against its general credit or taxing powers; (iv) shall not constitute a charge, lien, or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the City other than the City’s interest in the Series 2016BC Loan Agreement; and (v) shall not constitute a general or moral obligation of the City. 3.03. The proceeds derived from the sale of the Series 2016B Bonds and the Series 2016C Bonds will be loaned by the City to the Borrower pursuant to the Series 2016BC Loan Agreement and will be applied, along with available funds of the Borrower, to (i) finance the Expansion Project; (ii) finance a debt service reserve fund; (iii) finance capitalized interest during the construction of the Expansion Project; and (iv) pay costs of issuance of the Series 2016B Bonds and the Series 2016C Bonds. The proceeds will be disbursed in accordance with the Series 2016BC Indenture, the Series 2016BC Loan Agreement, and a Disbursing Agreement, to be dated on or after April 1, 2016, between the Borrower, the Trustee, and a disbursing agent to be named therein. 3.04. The loan repayments to be made by the Borrower under the Series 2016BC Loan Agreement will be fixed so as to produce revenue sufficient to pay the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Series 2016BC Bonds when due. Such loan repayments will be assigned to the Trustee under the terms of the Series 2016BC Indenture. The Borrower will secure its obligations by executing a Combination Mortgage, Security Agreement, Assignment of Rents and Leases, and Fixture Financing Statement, to be dated on or after April 1, 2016 (the “Series 2016BC Mortgage”), by the Borrower in favor of the Trustee, which will provide a mortgage lien on and security interest in the Facilities and the land on which the Facilities are located on a parity basi s with the Series 2016A Mortgage. Additionally, the Guarantor will jointly and severally agree to replenish draws on the debt service reserve fund established for the Series 2016B Bonds and the Series 2016C Bonds subject to certain conditions as provided in a Limited Guaranty Agreement, to be dated on or after April 1, 2016 (the “Series 2016BC Guaranty”), by the Guarantor in favor of the Trustee. 3.05. The City finds that the Expansion Project furthers the economic development purposes stated in Section 469.152 of the Act and constitutes a revenue producing “project,” as defined in Section 469.153, subdivision 2(d) of the Act. 3.06. The City acknowledges, finds, determines, and declares that the issuance of the Series 2016B Bonds and the Series 2016C Bonds is authorized by the Act and is consistent with the purposes of the Act and that the issuance of the Series 2016B Bonds and the Series 2016C Bonds, and the other actions of the City under the Series 2016BC Indenture, the Series 2016BC Loan Agreement, and this resolution constitute a public purpose and are in the interests of the City. 3.07. For the purposes set forth above, there is hereby authorized the issuance, sale, and delivery of the Series 2016B Bonds in the approximate aggregate principal amount of $21,015,000 and the Series 2016C Bonds in the approximate aggregate principal amount of $5,460,000; provided, however, that the combined aggregate principal amount of the Series 2016B Bonds and the Series 2016C Bonds shall not exceed $28,000,000; and provided, further, that DEED has City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 6a) Page 8 Title: Mount Olivet Private Activity Revenue Bonds approved the Expansion Project in accordance with the Act. The Series 2016B Bonds and the Series 2016C Bonds shall bear interest at the rates, shall be designated, shall be numbered, shall be dated, shall mature, shall be in the aggregate principal amount, shall be subject to redemption prior to maturity, shall be in such forms, and shall have such other terms, details, and provisions as are prescribed in the Series 2016BC Indenture, substantially in the form now on file with the City, with the amendments referenced herein. The City hereby authorizes the Series 2016B Bonds and the Series 2016C Bonds to be issued, in whole or in part, as “tax-exempt bonds,” the interest on which is not includable in gross income for federal and State of Minnesota income tax purposes. All of the provisions of the Series 2016B Bonds and the Series 2016C Bonds, when executed as authorized herein, shall be deemed to be a part of this resolution as fully and to the same extent as if incorporated verbatim herein and shall be in full force and effect from the date of execution and delivery thereof. The Series 2016B Bonds and the Series 2016C Bonds shall be substantially in the forms in the Series 2016BC Indenture on file with the City, which forms are hereby approved, with such necessary and appropriate variations, omissions, and insertions (including changes to the aggregate principal amount of the Series 2016B Bonds and the Series 2016C Bonds, the stated maturities of the Series 2016B Bonds and the Series 2016C Bonds, the interest rates on the Series 2016B Bonds and the Series 2016C Bonds and the terms of redemption of the Series 2016B Bonds and the Series 2016C Bonds) as the Mayor and the City Manager, in their discretion, shall determine. The execution of the Series 2016B Bonds and the Series 2016C Bonds with the manual or facsimile signatures of the Mayor and the City Manager and the delivery of the Series 2016B Bonds and the Series 2016C Bonds by the City shall be conclusive evidence of such determination. 3.08. The Series 2016B Bonds and the Series 2016C Bonds shall be special, limited obligations of the City payable solely from the revenues provided by the Borrower pursuant to the Series 2016BC Loan Agreement, including, on a parity basis with the Series 2016A Bonds and the Series 2016A Loan Agreement, revenues of the Facilities, and other funds pledged pursuant to the Series 2016BC Indenture. All of the provisions of the Series 2016BC Indenture, when executed as authorized herein, shall be deemed to be a part of this resolution as fully and to the same extent as if incorporated verbatim herein and shall be in full force and effect from the date of execution and delivery thereof. The Series 2016BC Indenture shall be substantially in the form on file with the City, which is hereby approved, with such necessary and appropriate variations, omissions and insertions as do not materially change the substance thereof, and as the Mayor and the City Manager, in their discretion, shall determine, and the execution thereof by the Mayor and the City Manager shall be conclusive evidence of such determination. The Mayor and the City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to execute the Series 2016BC Indenture, and to deliver the Series 2016BC Indenture to the Trustee, and are hereby authorized and directed to execute the Series 2016B Bonds and the Series 2016C Bonds in accordance with the terms of the Series 2016BC Indenture; provided, however, that DEED has approved the Expansion Project. The Series 2016BC Indenture shall provide the terms and conditions, covenants, rights, obligations, duties, and agreements of the owners of the Series 2016B Bonds and the Series 2016C Bonds, the City and the Trustee as set forth therein. 3.09. The Mayor and the City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver the Series 2016BC Loan Agreement and the Bond Purchase Agreement, to be dated after the date hereof (the “Series 2016BC Bond Purchase Agreement”), between the City, the Borrower, City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 6a) Page 9 Title: Mount Olivet Private Activity Revenue Bonds and the Underwriter, with respect to the sale and purchase of the Series 2016B Bonds and the Series 2016C Bonds. All of the provisions of the Series 2016BC Loan Agreement and Series 2016BC Bond Purchase Agreement, when executed and delivered as authorized herein, shall be deemed to be a part of this resolution as fully and to the same extent as if incorporated verbatim herein and shall be in full force and effect from the date of execution and delivery thereof. The Series 2016BC Loan Agreement and Series 2016BC Bond Purchase Agreement shall be substantially in the forms on file with the City, which are hereby approved, with such omissions and insertions as do not materially change the substance thereof, and as the Mayor and the City Manager, in their discretion, shall determine, and the execution thereof by the Mayor and the City Manager shall be conclusive evidence of such determinations. 3.10. The Mayor, the City Manager, and the Controller of the City are hereby authorized to execute and deliver, on behalf of the City, such other documents and certificates as are necessary or appropriate in connection with the issuance, sale, and delivery of the Series 2016B Bonds and the Series 2016C Bonds, including various certificates of the City, an Information Return for Tax- Exempt Private Activity Bond Issues, Form 8038 (Rev. April 2011), an endorsement of the City to the tax certificate of the Borrower, and similar documents. The City hereby approves the execution and delivery by the Trustee of the Series 2016BC Indenture and all other instruments, certificates, and documents prepared in conjunction with the issuance of the Series 2016B Bonds and the Series 2016C Bonds that require execution by the Trustee. The City hereby authorizes Bond Counsel to prepare, execute, and deliver its approving legal opinion with respect to the Series 2016B Bonds and the Series 2016C Bonds. 3.11. The City hereby authorizes the Borrower to provide such security for payment of its obligations under the Series 2016BC Loan Agreement and for payment of the Series 2016B Bonds and the Series 2016C Bonds, including the Series 2016BC Mortgage, the Series 2016BC Guaranty, or any other security agreed upon by the Borrower, and the City hereby approves the execution and delivery of such security. Section 4. Additional Findings and Certifications. 4.01. The Bonds are authorized to be issued in an amount not to exceed $33,000,000. As of the date hereof, the Series 2016A Bonds are expected to be issued in the approximate aggregate principal amount of $4,350,000, the Series 2016B Bonds are expected to be issued in the approximate aggregate principal amount of $21,015,000, and the Series 2016C Bonds are expected to be issued in the approximate aggregate principal amount of $5,460,000. However, the final principal amount of the Bonds may change so long as the combined aggregate principal amount of the Series 2016B Bonds and the Series 2016C Bonds does not exceed $28,000,000 and the collective aggregate principal amount of the Bonds does not exceed $33,000,000. 4.02. The Trustee is hereby appointed as paying agent and bond registrar for the Bonds. 4.03. The Mayor and the City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to execute the Cooperative Agreement with the City of Minneapolis. All of the provisions of the Cooperative Agreement, when executed and delivered as authorized herein, shall be deemed to be a part of this resolution as fully and to the same extent as if incorporated verbatim herein and shall be in full force and effect from the date of execution and delivery thereof. The Cooperative Agreement shall be substantially in the form on file with the City, which form is hereby approved, with such omissions and insertions as do not materially change the substance thereof, or as the Mayor and City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 6a) Page 10 Title: Mount Olivet Private Activity Revenue Bonds the City Manager, in their discretion, shall determine, and the execution thereof by the Mayor and the City Manager shall be conclusive evidence of such determination. 4.04. Except as otherwise provided in this resolution, all rights, powers, and privileges conferred and duties and liabilities imposed upon the City or the City Council by the provisions of this resolution or of the aforementioned documents shall be exercised or performed by the City or by such members of the City Council, or such officers, board, body or agency thereof as may be required or authorized by law to exercise such powers and to perform such duties. No covenant, stipulation, obligation or agreement herein contained or contained in the aforementioned documents shall be deemed to be a covenant, stipulation, obligation, or agreement of any member of the City Council of the City, or any officer, agent, or employee of the City in that person’s individual capacity, and neither the City Council of the City nor any officer or employee executing the Bonds shall be personally liable on the Bonds or be subject to any personal liability or accountability by reason of the issuance thereof. No provision, covenant or agreement contained in the aforementioned documents, the Bonds, or in any other document relating to the Bonds, and no obligation therein or herein imposed upon the City or the breach thereof, shall constitute or give rise to a general or moral obligation of the City or any pecuniary liability of the City or any charge upon its general credit or taxing powers. In making the agreements, provisions, covenants, and representations set forth in such documents, the City has not obligated itself to pay or remit any funds or revenues, other than funds and revenues derived from the Series 2016A Loan Agreement and the Series 2016BC Loan Agreement which are to be applied on a parity basis to the payment of the Bonds, as provided therein. 4.05. Except as herein otherwise expressly provided, nothing in this resolution or in the aforementioned documents expressed or implied is intended or shall be construed to confer upon any person or firm or corporation, other than the City, any holder of the Bonds issued under the provisions of this resolution, any right, remedy or claim, legal or equitable, under and by reason of this resolution or any provisions hereof, this resolution, the aforementioned documents, and all of their provisions being intended to be and being for the sole and exclusive benefit of the City, and any holder from time to time of the Bonds issued under the provisions of this resolution. 4.06. In case any one or more of the provisions of this resolution, other than the provisions contained in the first sentence of Sections 2.07 and 3.08 hereof, or of the aforementioned documents, or of the Bonds issued hereunder shall for any reason be held to be illegal or invalid, such illegality or invalidity shall not affect any other provision of this resolution, or of the aforementioned documents, or of the Bonds, but this resolution, the aforementioned documents, and the Bonds shall be construed and endorsed as if such illegal or invalid provision s had not been contained therein. 4.07. The Bonds, when executed and delivered, shall contain a recital that they are issued pursuant to the Act, and such recital shall be conclusive evidence of the validity of the Bonds and the regularity of the issuance thereof, and that all acts, conditions, and things required by the laws of the State of Minnesota relating to the adoption of this resolution, to the issuance of the Bonds, and to the execution of the aforementioned documents to happen, exist, and be performed precedent to the execution of the aforementioned documents have happened, exist, and have been performed as so required by law. City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 6a) Page 11 Title: Mount Olivet Private Activity Revenue Bonds 4.08. The officers of the City, Bond Counsel, other attorneys, engineers, and other agents or employees of the City are hereby authorized to do all acts and things required of them by or in connection with this resolution, the aforementioned documents, and the Bonds, for the full, punctual, and complete performance of all the terms, covenants, and agreements contained in th e Bonds, the aforementioned documents, and this resolution. If for any reason the Mayor or the City Manager is unable to execute and deliver the documents referred to in this resolution, such documents may be executed by any member of the City Council or any officer of the City delegated the duties of the Mayor or the City Manager with the same force and effect as if such documents were executed and delivered by the Mayor or the City Manager. 4.09. The City understands that the Borrower will pay directly to the City any and all costs paid or incurred by the City in connection with the transactions authorized herein, whether or not the Bonds are issued. The City further understands that the Borrower will pay to the City its administrative fee for the issuance of conduit debt. Section 5. Effective Date. This resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage. Approved by the City Council of St. Louis Park, Minnesota this 18th day of April, 2016. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council April 18, 2016 City Manager Mayor Attest: City Clerk Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 18, 2016 Action Agenda Item: 8a EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Adopt 2012 International Property Maintenance Code with Amendments RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to approve first reading adopting 2012 International Property Maintenance Code (IPMC) with Amendments in Chapter 6 Article V – Property Maintenance Code, Chapter 12 Article II Nuisances and set second reading May 2, 2016. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the proposed property maintenance code address the City Council’s desire to have well maintained properties in St. Louis Park? SUMMARY: The 2003 edition of the IPMC has been in use as a basis for our property maintenance programs for the past decade. This current edition is no longer in publication and not consistent with the 2012 edition of the International Code Council (ICC) codes for building construction adopted by the State during 2015. Initiating the process to adopt the 2012 IPMC provided an opportunity for review of additional provisions for addressing deteriorated property conditions. The proposed ordinance will delete the 2003 IPMC and all related amendments in Section 6-143, replacing it with the 2012 IPMC with deletions, amendments and additions. The proposed ordinance also includes amendments to Chapter 12 -33 Nuisances. These amendments will clarify when a public nuisance is created and allows abatement when necessary to resolve the concern. Staff presented to Council at the October 26, 2015 Study Session an overview of the 2012 IPMC and proposed city amendments. Council was supportive and directed staff to work with the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance for first reading. Copies of the 2012 IPMC will be made available to council members during the meeting. NEXT STEPS: A second reading will be scheduled for May 2, 2016 and if approved the ordinance will take effect 15 days after publication. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Adoption will not impact City staffing or budget. VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a well-maintained and diverse housing stock. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion Ordinance Prepared by: Ann Boettcher, Inspection Services Manager Reviewed by: Brian Hoffman, Director of Inspections Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Page 2 Title: Adopt 2012 International Property Maintenance Code with Amendments DISCUSSION BACKGROUND: Section 6-141 of the City Code for property maintenance has two very important components; 1) all buildings remain compliant to the Building Code standards in place at the time they were constructed or remodeled; and 2) maintained in compliance with the amended IPMC. This creates a comprehensive property maintenance code with a set of minimum standards applying to all buildings at all times, including single family, multi-family and commercial buildings. State Statute allows local government units to establish property maintenance codes provided they are not more restrictive than any of the State Building Codes. Our current property maintenance code and proposed ordinance are consistent with these parameters. For example, a 1950’s home may remain as it was built provided it has not been modified and is properly maintained. The exception is for smoke and carbon monoxide detectors, which are now required in all existing residential properties according to State Statue. The city adopted its first Building Code in 1926 and several subsequent editions until the State Building Code became effective in 1972. The department maintains a library of all the building codes that have been in effect since 1926 for reference. The IPMC is part of a family of model codes developed and published by the International Code Council (ICC). These codes for building construction, energy conservation, fire prevention, maintenance, and others are utilized by jurisdictions throughout many countries. They are written with input from local member jurisdictions and voted into the model codes at annual Code Hearings. New editions are published every three years. Council spent many hours reviewing and discussing the initial 2000 IPMC edition, adopted in 2001. The focus of this process was to ensure the IPMC was consistent with community goals, serving as a core to maintaining property values and community livability. Some provision were removed to be consistent with city procedures and Minnesota legal process. Other requirements, for example Chapter 4, Section 404 Occupancy Limitations, were deleted after council decided not to have the city involved with regulating how many children share a bedroom. The same perspective continued during adoption of the 2003 edition and also in the amendment package currently under consideration for the 2012 edition. ANALYSIS: All Property Maintenance Programs including; Point of Sale, Rental Licensing, Complaint Response, and City-wide Property Evaluations, utilize Section 6-141 to verify compliance. The guiding principles behind the adoption of this code are:  Establishment of a minimum level for property maintenance – applied equally on all buildings, at all times  Provides a program for overall public safety  Meets legal statutory requirements  Ensures consistent application of codes and inspections. Changes made to the 2012 IPMC edition by the ICC include some expanded sections and several refinements in wording for improved clarity. Some of the section numbering was also changed, making our current amendments to the referenced code inaccurate. City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Page 3 Title: Adopt 2012 International Property Maintenance Code with Amendments The new amendment package proposed for adopting the 2012 IPMC maintains the substance of the existing code and adds some enhancements. Following are highlighted amendments to the 2012 IPMC as having potentially positive effects for our community:  Chapter 1 Administration Amendments to sections in this chapter ensure the IPMC is consistent with State Statutes, rules, and City ordinances for inspections, notifications, appeals, and processes when dealing with properties and their owners.  Chapter 3 – General Requirements Section 302.2 - The City code has been lacking criteria when property owners (typically residential) with existing buildings make changes to grading or water runoff. This included construction of accessory buildings, additions, or landscaping that may negatively affect neighboring properties. Staff worked collectively with the Engineering Department to develop the proposed drainage and grading requirements. Section 304.7 Roofs and Drainage was expanded to include severely deteriorated roofs in addition to leaking. Section 310 Outdoor Storage is new and includes provisions to limit excessive outdoor storage. Scattered items left outside for extended periods is a common complaint registered with the city.  Chapter 4- Light Section 402.4 Exterior Lighting were added to better address issues dealing with the maintenance of exterior lighting. City Code Chapter 12, Article II Nuisances establishes criteria that constitutes a nuisance when conditions could affect public health and safety. Once declared a nuisance and following a specified process, property conditions may be abated by the city with the cost charged to the property owner. This section may be used by the Property Maintenance Inspector in addition to the IPMC during inspection programs. Although the abatement process has not been frequently necessary, there have been complaints and discoveries of items which have not fit the current criteria of nuisances under the current code. The proposed amendment expands the classification of nuisance to help provide staff with the tools to resolve the problem. Sections 12-33, 12- 34, 12-62, and 12-63 are proposed to be amended with added provisions including, but not limited to:  Accumulated yard and animal waste  Insect and rodent infestations  Unused construction materials  Severely deteriorated structures that may not qualify for State hazardous abatement process which may include accessory structures and fences  Junk vehicles City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Page 4 Title: Adopt 2012 International Property Maintenance Code with Amendments ORDINANCE NO._____-16 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE ST. LOUIS PARK ORDINANCE CODE CHAPTER 6: ARTICLE V – PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE AND AMENDING CHAPTER 12 DIVISION 1. GENERALLY AND DIVISION 2. JUNK VEHICLES THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK DOES ORDAIN: Section 1. Section 6-142 of the St. Louis Park Code of Ordinances is amended to read as follows: Sec. 6-142. Code adopted. The International Property Maintenance Code, 2003 2012 edition, as published by the International Code Council is adopted as the property maintenance code of the city, for the control of builds and structures as provided in this article; and each and all of the regulations, provisions, penalties, conditions and terms of such code are referred to, adopted and made a part of this article, as if fully set out in the section, with the additions, insertions, deletions and changes as set forth in section 6-143. Section 2. Delete Section 6-143 of the St Louis Park Code of Ordinances in its entirety and replace with the following amendments: Sec. 6-143. Revisions. The following sections of the International Property Maintenance Code, 2012 edition, are revised as follows: Section 101.1. Title. Amended to read: These regulations shall be known as the Property Maintenance Code of the City of St. Louis Park, hereinafter referred to as "this code." Section 102.1. General. Deleted Section 102.3. Application of other codes. Amended to read: Repairs, additions or alterations to a structure or changes of occupancy shall be done in accordance with the procedures and provisions of the Minnesota State Building Code and the City of St. Louis Park Code of Ordinances. Section 102.7. Referenced codes and standards. Amended to read: All references to other codes or standards within this Code shall mean the applicable provisions of St. Louis Park Code of Ordinances or Minnesota State Building Code, whichever is the most restrictive requirement permitted under statute. Exception. Delete Section 102.7.1 Conflicts. Deleted Section 102.7.2 Provisions in referenced code and standards. Deleted Section 102.10 Other laws. Deleted City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Page 5 Title: Adopt 2012 International Property Maintenance Code with Amendments Section 103.2. Appointment. Amended to read: The director of inspections shall be the code official. Section 103.5 Fees. Deleted. Section 104.3 Right of Entry. Amended to read: Where it is necessary to make an inspection to enforce the provisions of the code, or whenever the code official has reasonable cause to believe that there exists in a structure or upon a premises a condition in violation of this code, the code official is authorized to enter the structure or premises at reasonable times to inspect or perform the duties imposed by this code, provided that if such structure or premises is occupied the code official shall present credentials to the occupant and request entry. If such structure or premises is unoccupied, the code official shall first make a reasonable effort to locate the owner or other person have charge or control of the structure or premises and request entry. If consensual entry is refused or not obtained, the code official is authorized to pursue recourse as provided by law. Section 106.3 Prosecution of violation. Amended to read: Any person failing to comply with a notice of violation or order served in accordance with Section 107 shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and the violation shall be deemed a strict liability offense. If the notice of violation is not complied with, the code official shall institute the appropriate proceeding at law or in equity to restrain, correct or abate such violation, or to require the removal or termination of the unlawful occupancy of the structure in violation of the provisions of this code or of the order or direction made pursuant thereto. Any expenses incurred in carrying out the enforcement of the provisions of this ordinance shall be included as an assessment for a service against the property by the City Clerk Section 107.1 Notice to person responsible. Amended to read: Whenever the code official determines that there has been a violation of this code or has grounds to believe that a violation has occurred, notice shall be given to the owner or occupant of the structure. Failure to provide notice under this section shall not invalidate any proceedings initiated by the City. Section 107.2 Form. Subsection 5. Deleted. Section 107.2 Form. Subsection 6. Deleted. Section 107.6 Transfer of ownership. Deleted. Section 108.1 General. Amended to read: When a structure or equipment is found by the code official to be unsafe, or when a structure is found unfit for human occupancy, or is found unlawful, such structure shall be subject to the provisions of this code. Section 108.1.5.(7) Amended to read: The building or structure is neglected, damaged, dilapidated, unsecured or abandoned so as to become an attractive nuisance to children who might play in the building or structure to their danger, becomes harbor for vagrants, criminals, or enables persons to resort to the building or structure for committing a nuisance or unlawful act. Section 108.2 Closing of vacant structures. Amended to read: If the structure is vacant and unfit for human habitation and occupancy, and is not in danger of structural collapse, the code official is authorized to post the premises and order the structure closed up so as not to be an attractive nuisance. Upon failure of the owner to close up the premises within the time specified in the order, City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Page 6 Title: Adopt 2012 International Property Maintenance Code with Amendments the code official shall cause the premises to be closed and secured through any available public agency or by contract or arrangement by private persons and the cost thereof shall be assessed to the real estate upon which the structure is located. Section 108.3 Notice. Amended to read: Whenever a code official has determined a structure or equipment is unsafe, a structure is unfit for human occupancy or a structure is unlawful under the provisions of this section, notice shall be posted in a conspicuous place in or about the structure affected by such notice and served on the owner or the person occupying the premises. If the notice pertains to equipment, it shall also be placed on the unsafe equipment. Section 108.4 Posting. Amended to read: Upon failure of the owner, occupant or persons responsible to comply with the notice provisions within the time given, the code official shall place a posting on the premises or on the defective equipment which shall provide a statement of the penalties for occupying the premises, operating the equipment or removing the posting. Section 108.4.1Posting removal. Amended to read: The code official shall remove the posting whenever the defect or defects upon which the enforcement action and posting were based have been eliminated. Any person who defaces or removes a posting without the approval of the code official shall be subjected to the penalties provided by this code. Section 108.5 Prohibited occupancy. Amended to read: Any occupied structure posted by the code official shall be vacated as ordered by the code official. Any person who shall occupy a posted premises or shall operate posted equipment, and any owner or person responsible for the premises who shall let anyone occupy a posted premises or operate posted equipment, shall be liable for the penalties provided by this code. Section 109.6. Hearing. Deleted. Section 110.1 General. Amended to read: The code official shall order the owner of any premises upon which is located any structure, which in the code official judgement after review is o deteriorated or dilapidated or has become so out of repair as to be dangerous, unsafe, insanitary or otherwise unfit for human habitation or occupancy, and such that it is unreasonable to repair the structure, to demolish and remove such structure; or if such structure is capable of being made safe by repairs, to repair and make safe and sanitary, or to board up and hold for future repair or to demolish and remove at the owner’s option. Section 111.1. Request for appeal hearing. Amended to read: Any person directly affected by a notice or order issued under this code shall have the right to an appeal hearing when requested in writing to the city. The hearing shall be held within 20 days of the city receiving a request for appeal. A request for appeal shall be based on a claim that the true intent of this code or the rules legally adopted under this code have been incorrectly interpreted, the provisions of this code do not fully apply or the requirements of this code are adequately satisfied by other means, or that strict application of any requirement of this code would cause undue hardship. Section 111.2. Hearing official. Amended to read: The city manager or his/her appointed designee shall serve as the hearing official for all appeals of this code. The hearing official shall consider all relevant evidence, documents and verbal presentations submitted during the hearing from the appeals applicant and the code official. Within ten days following the appeal hearing, the hearing official shall notify the applicant and code official in writing of the decision. City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Page 7 Title: Adopt 2012 International Property Maintenance Code with Amendments Section 111.3. Limitations of authority. Amended to read: An application for appeal shall be based on a claim that the true intent of this code has been incorrectly interpreted or the provisions of this code do not fully apply. The Hearing Official shall have no authority to waive the requirements of this code. Section 111.4. Stays of enforcement. Amended to read: Appeal requests, except for imminent danger orders or hazardous building notices, shall stay the enforcement of the notice and order until the hearing official has notified the applicant and code official in writing of a decision on the appeal. Section 111.5 Postponed hearing. Delete Section 111.6 Board decision. Delete Section 111.7 Court review. Delete Section 111.8 Stays of enforcement. Delete Section 112.4 Failure to comply. Delete Section 202 GENERAL DEFINITIONS – CONDEMN. Deleted. Section 202 GENERAL DEFINITIONS – ULTIMATE DEFORMATION. Amended to read: The deformation at which failure occurs and which shall be deemed to occur if the sustainable load reduces to 80 percent or less of the maximum strength or as determined by a Minnesota Registered Engineer. Section 302.2 Grading and Drainage. Amended to read: All premises shall be graded and maintained to prevent the erosion of soil and to prevent the accumulation of stagnant water thereon, or within any structure locate thereon. The following is a recommendation for Stormwater Runoff and Drainage Controls for the Property Maintenance Code shall apply: a) Adequate Surface drainage:  All properties within the City shall maintain adequate surface drainage in a manner that does not create a public nuisance, health or safety hazard, or cause harm to persons or adjacent property due to changes in surface runoff or settlements due to lack of maintenance. b) Point Source Discharges:  Gutter downspouts, sump pump discharges, swimming pools, and other point source discharges shall be directed towards vegetated areas. They shall not be directed towards existing structures or impervious surfaces in a manner that will create a safety or health hazard on adjacent properties or create a public nuisance c) Construction Storm water management:  If a scope of land disturbance does not require an erosion and sediment control permit as described in Chapter 12 – Environment, the activity shall adhere to the City’s erosion and sediment control standards and not discharge sediment or sediment laden water from the property. City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Page 8 Title: Adopt 2012 International Property Maintenance Code with Amendments Section 302.3 Sidewalks and Driveways. Amended to read: All sidewalks, walkways, stairs, driveways, parking spaces and similar areas shall be kept in a proper state of repair, and maintained free from hazardous conditions such as but not limited to broken pavement, potholes, tripping hazards and vegetation growth through the parking or sidewalk surfaces. Section 302.4. Weeds. Amended to read: All premises and exterior property shall be maintained free from all noxious weeds or turf grass growth in excess of six inches. Section 302.8. Motor vehicles. Amended to read: Except as otherwise provided in this St. Louis Park Municipal Code of Ordinances, no junk vehicle, stock car, racing car, inoperative vehicle, or unlicensed motor vehicle shall be parked, kept or stored on any premises unless within a totally enclosed structure. No vehicle shall at any time be in a state of major disassembly, disrepair or in the process of being stripped or dismantled unless totally enclosed. Spray painting of vehicles is prohibited unless conducted inside an approved spray booth. Exception. Any vehicle is permitted to undergo major overhaul, including minor sheet metal or fiberglass panel repair and finishing, provided that such work is performed inside a structure or similarly enclosed area designed and approved for such purposes. Automotive maintenance and repair shall be limited to the owners/occupants who reside at that address. Section 304.3 Premises identification. Amended by adding new section: Property abutting alleys shall also have the street address posted so as to be visible from the alley. Address numbers must be placed on the building nearest the alley and meet the same requirements as for the numbers facing the primary street frontage. Section 304.3.1 Multidwelling identification. Amended by adding new section to read: All units and rooms in multidwelling buildings, including, but not limited to, homes for the aged, hotels, motels, lodginghouses and boardinghouses, apartments and condominiums shall be identified as separate units by consecutive numbering or lettering which shall be placed on the door in Arabic numerals or English capital letters, with a minimum size of three inches and a one-half- inch stroke. Section 304.7 Roofs and Drainage. Amended to read: The roof and flashing shall be maintained sound, weather-tight, and in good repair. Roofs shall not have defects or deterioration that allow precipitation to pass. Roof drainage shall be adequate to prevent dampness or deterioration in the walls or interior portion of the structure. Roof drains, gutters, and downspouts shall be maintained in good repair and free from obstructions. Roof water shall not be discharged in a manner that creates a public nuisance. Asphalt shingles that are worn or curled shall be repaired or replaced. Section 304.13.1. Glazing. Amended to read: Glazing must be maintained, securely held in place, and free from holes or missing pieces. No jagged or abrasive edges are permitted. Section 304.13.2. Openable windows. Amended to read: Every window required by this code for ventilation or egress must be easily openable and capable of being held in place by window hardware. Section 304.13.3. Storm Windows. Amended by adding: All openable windows with a single layer of glass, in rental dwelling units, must be provided with tightfitting storm windows. Storm City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Page 9 Title: Adopt 2012 International Property Maintenance Code with Amendments windows may be temporarily removed to allow for the installation of screens during periods of warm weather. Section 304.14. Insect screens. Amended to read: When insect screens are installed over openings into any building they must be maintained in good condition, securely held in place, and free from holes or tears. Exception. Deleted. Section 304.14.1. Screens required. Amended by adding new section to read: All openable windows in rental dwelling units must be provided with tightfitting insect screens of not less than 16 mesh per inch. Insect screens may be temporarily removed to allow for the installation of storm windows during periods of cold weather. Section 304.15.1. Landings. Amended by adding new section to read: Exterior doors, other than storm doors must swing over a floor or landing of at least the width of the door opening, extending from the threshold for a distance at least equal to the door width, and must not be more than eight inches below the height of the door threshold. Section 304.18.1. Doors. Deleted. Section 305.7. Food preparation. Amended by adding new section to read: All spaces to be occupied for food preparation purposes shall contain suitable space and equipment to store, prepare and serve foods in a sanitary manner. There shall be adequate facilities and services for the sanitary disposal of food wastes and refuse, including facilities for temporary storage. Section 308.3.1. Garbage facilities. Deleted. Section 308.4. Construction debris. Amended by adding new section to read: All debris from construction, remodeling, repair or demolition of a building shall be placed in approved dumpsters or contained to prevent scattering of any debris from the project site .Dumpsters or contained areas shall be emptied, cleaned, maintained and free of overfill. Section 310 Outdoor Storage. Amended by adding new section: Unless specifically permitted by the Zoning Code Chapter 36, no outdoor storage, personal or business items are permitted. Items include, but not limited to the following; lawnmowers, snow blowers, lawn/garden equipment, construction material or equipment. Exemption – The following items are exempt from the outdoor storage prohibition of this section: a) Clothesline poles and lines b) Patio furniture c) Barbecue grills d) Ornamental yard enhancements (landscaping, light poles, trellises, benches designed for exterior use and other permanent improvements designed to enhance the appearance of the yard). e) Children’s play equipment Section 402.1. Habitable spaces. Amended to read: Every habitable space shall have at least one window facing directly to the outdoors or to a court. City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Page 10 Title: Adopt 2012 International Property Maintenance Code with Amendments Exception. Where natural light for the room or space is provided from an adjoining room through an unobstructed opening equal to at least eight percent of the floor area of the interior room or space. 402.4 Exterior Lighting. Amended by adding new section: Exterior lighting shall be maintained, operational and free of broken or defective lenses and housing. Section 403.1. Habitable spaces. Amended to read: Every habitable space shall have at least one openable window directly to the outdoors or to a court. Exception. When the room or space is provided with a mechanical ventilation system capable of supplying conditioned or unconditioned air to, or removing such air from any space. Section 403.2. Bathrooms and toilet rooms. Amended by adding exception to read: Exception. Bathrooms or toilet rooms that contain only a water closet, lavatory or combination thereof may be ventilated with an approved mechanical recirculating fan designed to remove odors from the air. Section 404. Occupancy limitations. Deleted entire section from 404.1 – 404.7. Section 503.3. Location of employee toilet facilities. Deleted. Section 505.1. General. Amended to read: Every sink, lavatory, bathtub or shower, drinking fountain, water closet or other plumbing fixture shall be properly connected to either a public water system or to an approved private water system. All kitchen sinks, lavatories, laundry facilities, bathtubs and showers shall be supplied with hot or tempered and cold running water in accordance with the MN State Plumbing Code. Section 602.2. Residential occupancies. Amended to read: Dwellings shall be provided with heating facilities capable of maintaining a room temperature of 68 degrees Fahrenheit in all habitable rooms, bathrooms and toilet rooms when the outdoor temperature is minus 20 degrees Fahrenheit or warmer. Cooking appliances shall not be used to provide space heating to meet the requirements of this section. Section 602.3. Heat supply. Amended to read: Every owner and operator of any building who rents, leases or lets one or more dwelling units, rooming units, dormitory or guestroom on terms, either expressed or implied, shall furnish heat in compliance with section 602.2 to the occupants from September 1 to June 1. Exception. When the outdoor temperature is below the winter outdoor design temperature for the locality, maintenance of the minimum room temperature shall not be required, provided that the heating system is operating at its full design capacity. Section 602.4. Occupiable workspaces. Deleted. Section 603.1.1. Appliance testing. Amended by adding new section to read: Central heating appliances shall be tested by a licensed mechanical contractor to verify that the appliance is in a City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Page 11 Title: Adopt 2012 International Property Maintenance Code with Amendments safe working condition when evidence of malfunction, corrosion, deterioration or excessive interior carbon monoxide is suspected. Section 603.2. Removal of combustion products. Amended to read: All fuel-burning equipment and appliances intended for heating shall be connected to an approved chimney or vent to the exterior of the building. Exception. Deleted. Section 605.3. Luminaire locations. Amended by adding: Luminaires are not permitted within or above shelving space within closets and enclosed storage rooms. Section 606.1 General. Amended to read: Elevators, dumbwaiters and escalators shall be maintained in compliance per MN. State Rule Chapter 1307. Section 702.1 General. Amended to read: A safe, continuous and unobstructed path of travel shall be provided from any point in a building or structure to the public way. Means of egress shall comply with the MN State Fire Code. Section 702.2 Aisles. Amended to read: The required width of aisles in accordance with the MN State Fire Code shall be unobstructed. Section 702.3. Locked doors. Amended and adding exception to read: All means of egress doors shall be readily openable from the side from which egress is to be made without the need of keys, special knowledge or effort, except where the door hardware conforms to that permitted by the MN State Building Code. Exception. Double-keyed deadbolts are permitted in existing single-family residential dwellings, residential duplexes and individually owned townhomes. Section 704.1. General. Amended to read: All systems, devices and equipment to detect a fire, actuate an alarm, or suppress or control a fire or any combination thereof shall be maintained in an operable condition at all times in accordance with the MN State Fire Code. Sections 704.2. Amended to read: Smoke Detection and Carbon Monoxide Alarms. All buildings shall have smoke detectors and carbon monoxide alarms installed and operational in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 299F.362 and 299F.51. Sections 704.3 – 704.4. Deleted entire sections Chapter 8. Referenced standards. Amended to read: All references to other codes or standards within this code shall mean the applicable provisions of St. Louis Park Code of Ordinances or Minnesota State Building Code, whichever is the most restrictive requirement permitted under statute. Section 3. Section 12-33 of the City Code shall be amended to read as follows: In addition to those conditions identified elsewhere, the following are declared to be nuisances affecting health: City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Page 12 Title: Adopt 2012 International Property Maintenance Code with Amendments (1) All diseased animals running at large. (2) Carcasses of animals not buried or destroyed or otherwise disposed of within 24 hours after death. (3) Accumulations of decaying animal or plant material, animal or human feces, trash, refuse, yard waste, rubbish, garbage, rotting lumber, packing material, scrap metal, tires or any other substances manure or rubbish which are can be breeding places for flies, mosquitoes or vermin, except compost maintained in compliance with chapter 22, article III. (4) Privy vaults and garbage cans which are not fly tight. (5) All noxious weeds and other rank growths of vegetation upon public or private property. (6) Dense smoke, noxious fumes, gas and soot, dust or cinders in such quantities as to render the occupancy of property uncomfortable to a person of ordinary sensibilities. (7) All public exposure of persons having a contagious disease. (8) All other acts, omissions of acts, occupations and uses of property which are a menace to the public health. (9) The intentional or negligent discharge of items including but not limited to refuse, leaves, grass clippings, solvents, antifreeze, oil, gas, fireplace ashes, paint, swimming pool water or cement rein sate into a street, storm sewer system, or water resource such as a wetland, creek, pond or lake. This includes illegal discharge or discard of any item on to any land within the City limits. (10) Improper sewage disposal to such degree that sewage or effluent is discharging onto the surface of the ground, backing up into a structure or discharging into a body of water. (11) Infestations of flies, fleas, cockroaches, lice, rats, mice, fly larvae or hookworm larvae. (12) Breeding grounds not naturally occurring which support mosquito larvae or mosquitoes carrying West Nile Virus, La Crosse Encephalitis Virus or any other disease causing microorganism. (13) Outdoor burners of fuel, including, but not limited to, wood, trash, corn, pellets and biomass, that are detached from or exterior to a principal building and intended for use as a water or space heating source are considered to produce excessive smoke and therefore prohibited. Section 4. Section 12-34 of the City Code shall be amended to read as follows: In addition to those conditions identified elsewhere, the following are declared to be nuisances affecting public peace, welfare and safety: (1) All limbs of trees, shrubs, bushes, weeds or any other vegetative growth which are less than eight feet above the surface of any street or sidewalk. (2) All wires which are strung less than 15 feet above the surface of the ground. (3) All buildings, walls and other structures which have been damaged by fire, decay or otherwise, and which are situated as to endanger the safety of the public. (4) All explosives, inflammable liquids and other dangerous substances stored in any manner or in any amount other than that provided by ordinance or state or federal law. (5) All use or display of fireworks except as provided by ordinance or state or federal law. City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Page 13 Title: Adopt 2012 International Property Maintenance Code with Amendments (6) All loud or unusual noises and annoying vibrations which offend the peace and quiet of persons of ordinary sensibilities or which violate article IV of this chapter. (7) Obstructions and excavations affecting the ordinary use by the public of streets, alleys and sidewalks, or public grounds, except under such conditions as are provided by ordinance. (8) Radio aerials strung or erected over streets or alleys or attached to poles of public service companies. (9) Any use of the public street or sidewalk which causes large crowds of people to gather, obstructing traffic and the free use of the streets or sidewalks. (10) All hanging signs, awnings and other similar structures over the streets or sidewalks, and so situated as to endanger public safety. (11) All barbed wire fences which are located within three feet of any public sidewalk. All barbed wire fences except for barbed wire on top of non-residential fences, where barbed wire is at least six (6) feet above grade and at least three (3) feet from all public sidewalks. (12) All dangerous, unguarded machinery in any public place, or so situated or operated on private property as to attract the public. (13) All other acts, omissions of acts, occupations and uses of property which are a menace to the public health and safety as determined by the director of inspections. (14) Feeding of deer, raccoons, wild turkeys, coyotes, opossum, Canada goose or prohibited animals identified in Section 4-42. (15) The existence and creation of graffiti. For the purpose of this subsection, the term "graffiti" shall mean any unauthorized inscription, word, figure, painting, printing, marks, signs, symbols, figures, designs, inscriptions, or other drawings or other defacement which are written, marked, etched, scratched, sprayed, drawn, painted or engraved on or otherwise placed or affixed to any surface of objects such as buildings, walls, fences, sidewalks, curbs, vehicles, trees, rocks, or other structures or objects on public and private property or the interior surfaces of those parts of buildings accessible to the general public and which has the effect of defacing the property. (16) The exterior storage of firewood that either: a. Is infested with rodents, insects or other nuisance animals; b. Is stacked less than six inches or more than five feet above grade; c. Exceeds a maximum ground coverage of 64 square feet for each stack; d. Has stacks on a lot that are within ten feet of each other; e. Is stacked in a disorderly manner; or f. Is otherwise a threat to health and safety. (17) Any condition that interferes with, obstructs, or renders dangerous for passage a public roadway, highway or right-of-way or waters used by the public. (18) Any construction materials or equipment left in the open on a residential site ninety (90) or more days after authorized work has stopped. (19) Discarded construction material or other litter at a construction site that is not placed in an adequate waste container or that is allowed to blow around or off the site. (20) Any structure that has become dangerous for further use or occupancy because of structural or sanitary defects or grossly unsanitary conditions. (21) Principle, accessory and other structures or improvements that have been so poorly maintained that their physical condition and appearance detract from the surrounding neighborhood are declared to be public nuisances affecting the general City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Page 14 Title: Adopt 2012 International Property Maintenance Code with Amendments welfare because they are unsightly, decrease adjoining landowners' and occupants' enjoyment of their property and neighborhood, and adversely affect property values and neighborhood patterns. Nuisances include: a. Exterior walls with holes, breaks or loose or rotting materials, or which are not maintained as weatherproof and properly surface coated where required to prevent deterioration b. Exterior surfaces, including but not limited to, doors, door and window frames, cornices, porches, trim, balconies, decks or fences not maintained in good condition. Exterior wood surfaces, other than decay-resistant woods, not protected from the elements and decay by painting or other protective covering or treatment. Peeling, flaking or chipped paint. All siding or masonry joints as well as those between the building envelope and the perimeter of windows, doors, and skylights not maintained weather resistant and water tight. All metal surfaces subject to rust or corrosion not coated to inhibit such rust and corrosion. Surfaces with untreated rust or corrosion. Oxidation stains. c. Windows, skylights, doors or frames not kept in sound condition, good repair or weather tight. Glazing materials with cracks or holes. d. Exterior doors, door assemblies or hardware not maintained in good condition. Locks at all entrances to dwelling units, rooming units or guestrooms which do not tightly secure the door. e. Cornices, belt courses, corbels, terra cotta trim, wall facings or similar decorative features not maintained in good repair with proper anchorage or in a safe condition. f. Roof drains, gutters or downspouts not maintained in good repair and free from obstructions. Roof or flashing not sound, tight or having defects that admit rain. Roof drainage inadequate to prevent dampness or deterioration in the walls or interior portion of the structure. g. Chimneys, cooling towers, smoke stacks or similar appurtenances not maintained as structurally sound, or in good repair. All exposed surfaces of metal or wood not protected from the elements or against decay or rust by periodic application of weather-coating materials, such as paint or similar surface treatment. h. Foundation walls not maintained plumb or free from open cracks or breaks or kept in such condition so as to prevent the entry of rodents or other pests. (22) An unsecured hole or opening caused by improperly abandoned cistern, well pit, sewage treatment system, unused or non-maintained swimming pool, foundation, mine shaft or tunnel or any other hole or opening in the ground of sufficient size or depth to pose a danger to the public or an attractive nuisance. (23) Accumulations of personal property, rubbish or debris in any residence that could prevent emergency egress. (24) Accumulations of animal feces, rubbish or junk remaining in any place as to become dangerous or injurious to the safety of any individual or to the public. (25) At single-family and two-family dwelling units, the non-temporary parking or storage of more than four vehicles, including abandoned, junk and inoperable vehicles, per unit outside of a garage or on street. Section 5. Section 12-62 of the City Code shall be amended to read as follows: City Council Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Page 15 Title: Adopt 2012 International Property Maintenance Code with Amendments No person shall park, keep, place or store, or permit the parking or storage of a stock car, racing car, junk car or junk car parts on a public street or alley, or on any private lands or premises which he owns, occupies or controls unless it shall be within a building on such private premise. Such acts are hereby declared a nuisance under this article. Section 6. Section 12-63 of the City Code shall be amended to read as follows: No person shall service, repair, replace parts or do maintenance work on a stock car, racing car or junk car on a public street nor on any private lands or premises unless it shall be within a building on such private premises. Such acts are hereby declared a nuisance under this article. Section 7. This Ordinance shall take effect not less than fifteen days after its publication. Section 8. The City Clerk is instructed to record certified copies of this ordinance in the Office of the Hennepin County Register of Deeds or Registrar of Titles as the case may be upon confirmation of the Director of Engineering’s acceptance of relocated water line. First Reading April 18, 2016 Second Reading May 2, 2016 Date of Publication May 11, 2016 Date Ordinance may take effect May 26, 2016 Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council May 2, 2016 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Approved as to Form and Execution: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Soren Mattick, City Attorney Meeting: Special Study Session Meeting Date: April 18, 2016 Discussion Item: 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Excelsior & Monterey Redevelopment (Bridgewater/Dominium) RECOMMENDED ACTION: The Council is asked to provide input on the proposed project. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Is the project in keeping with the Councils goals for this site? SUMMARY: Bridgewater Bank purchased property at 4424 and 4400 Excelsior Blvd, and is also pursuing the acquisition of 3743 Monterey Dr. from the Economic Development Authority (EDA). Bridgewater selected Dominium as the developer for this site. The City is processing applications for a preliminary plat with variances and preliminary planned unit development (PUD). The proposal includes 167 dwelling units and 17,500 square feet of retail on the first floor, and three levels of parking under the building. Twenty percent (20%) of the units will be affordable at 50% of the area median income. Bridgewater Bank intends to occupy 10,000 square feet of the first floor. The building is six stories tall and steps down in height on the northwest side to reduce shadow impacts on the buildings to the north. City Council met with Bridgewater on July 14, 2014, to discuss mutual redevelopment visions, goals and preliminary ideas for the site; the concept of a six-story tall, mixed-use development; the sale of the EDA property; building massing, orientation, and height; parking and property ingress and egress; inclusion of affordable housing units; and provision of tax increment financing (TIF) assistance to facilitate a redevelopment. Council reviewed a written report on April 13, 2015, after the City received a Comprehensive Plan Amendment request. Also, Council discussed traffic study information and mitigation options related to this area on August 10 and October 19, 2015. Council amended the Comprehensive Plan on June 1, 2015. The development needs approval of a preliminary plat with variances, preliminary PUD, drainage and utility easements vacations, final plat, final PUD, and the EDA will need to approve the sale of land to the redeveloper. Several of these actions require five of seven votes to be approved. Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 16, 2016, and recommended approval of the preliminary plat and preliminary PUD on a 3-2 vote. The Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission reviewed the plat and recommended cash-in-lieu of land for the park dedication. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The proposed redevelopment will require acquisition of the EDA’s property located at 3743 Monterey Drive. The parties have not reached agreement on a purchase price; however, it is the EDA’s practice to sell property at market rate. In order for redevelopment to occur on the assembled site at the proposed scale and density, TIF will be needed to defray a portion of the building demolition, site preparation, and structured parking costs. The amount of financial assistance needed has yet to be determined. VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a well-maintained and diverse housing stock. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion, Planning Commission Unofficial Minutes, Development Plans Prepared by: Sean Walther, Planning and Zoning Supervisor Reviewed by: Michele Schnitker, Deputy Community Development Director/Housing Supv. Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Special Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 2) Page 2 Title: Excelsior & Monterey Redevelopment (Bridgewater/Dominium) DISCUSSION INTRODUCTION: Following are the full details and the staff review of the development that will be presented to the City Council for action in May, 2016. The purpose of the study session is to provide these site plan details, allow the applicant to present the development to City Council, and to allow the Council to ask questions, and allow individual Council Members’ to share comments regarding the development in an informal meeting. REQUEST: St. Louis Park Leased Housing Associates I, LLC (Dominium Development and Bridgewater Bank) requests approvals of a Preliminary Plat with variances and Preliminary PUD. The PUD is a rezoning and zoning text amendment of the property under the City’s PUD ordinance. The preliminary plat would combine the three parcels at 4400 and 4424 Excelsior Boulevard and 3743 Monterey Drive and create two parcels. The proposed development is a six story, mixed used building. The first floor of the development will be commercial, with the upper five floors being comprised of 167 multifamily residential rental housing. The residential portion of the project will provide at least 20% of the units to tenants at or below 50% of the county area median income (AMI). Structured parking will be provided within and below the building. The proposed unit mix includes 48.5% (81) two-bedroom units, 40% (68) one bedroom units, 6% (10) studio units, and 5% (8) three-bedroom units. The preliminary plat with subdivision variances reconfigures the three existing lots into two lots and allows reduced widths of the drainage and utility easements in some areas. The PUD is needed in order to increase the density of the development from 50 units per acre to 80.8 units per acre on the proposed Lot 1 (or 69.9 units per acre if both Lot 1 and Lot 2 are included in the calculation). The PUD also provides flexibility on the building setbacks. BACKGROUND: Bridgewater Bank purchased 4424 Excelsior Boulevard and 4400 Excelsior Boulevard. The Economic Development Authority (EDA) owns 3743 Monterey Drive and has indicated to Bridgewater Bank and Dominium Development that it would be willing to sell the property in order to facilitate the proposed development. Bridgewater Bank and Dominium Development are owner partners in this project, with Dominium Development leading the redevelopment of the properties. Existing Site Conditions: The site is on the northeast corner of Excelsior Boulevard and Monterey Drive, across Monterey Drive from Trader Joe’s. The proposed development is in the Wolfe Park Neighborhood. Nearby parks and open space amenities include Wolfe Park and Bass Lake Preserve. The site is served by Metro Transit Bus Route 12 along Excelsior Boulevard. The site is just over one-half mile from the Cedar Lake LRT Regional Trail and the future Beltline Southwest Light Rail Transit Station. The three combined parcels are 2.39 acres in size and include a single-story commercial building that houses several retail businesses and a two-story building that has recently been renovated where Bridgewater Bank has opened a local branch. The St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority owns the vacant wooded lot to the north. Special Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 2) Page 3 Title: Excelsior & Monterey Redevelopment (Bridgewater/Dominium) There is a large grade change on the site, with the northern portion of the site lying approximately 20 feet below the grade of Excelsior Boulevard. The site is generally flat along Excelsior Boulevard and Monterey Drive. The northern portions of the site are also generally flat and used for a surface parking lot. There is an existing 20 foot tall retaining wall on the property. Site Location Map. Site Area: 2.89 acres; excluding proposed road right-of-way the combined site will be 2.39 acres Current Zoning Districts: C2 – General Commercial, R4 – Multiple Family Residence Proposed Zoning District: PUD – Planned Unit Development Comprehensive Plan Designation: MX – Mixed-Use Current Use: Multi-tenant retail, Bridgewater Bank, and a wooded vacant lot Adjacent Uses: North: 3-story tall multi-family residential, nursing home, single family dwellings, 36½ St W East: car wash, single family residential, Kipling Ave S South: Excelsior Blvd, 1- and 2-story tall commercial buildings West: Monterey Dr, 5-story tall mixed-use building, 3-story tall multiple family residential PUD ANALYSIS: Comprehensive Plan: In 2015, the City Council approved a Comprehensive Plan future land use map amendment to guide this land for Mixed Use. The current zoning map contemplates commercial and multiple family uses. The proposed PUD would create a new zoning district and zoning regulations for uses and dimensional standards that are unique to this site and the proposed site and building plans. The intent of the Mixed Use land use designation and the City’s Livable Communities design principles is to create compact, pedestrian-scale, mixed-use buildings, typically with retail, service or other commercial uses on the ground floor and residential or office uses on upper floors. Mixed- Special Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 2) Page 4 Title: Excelsior & Monterey Redevelopment (Bridgewater/Dominium) use is intended to accommodate mixed-income housing, a mix of housing types on the same block, and higher density development. Zoning Table. The following table provides the zoning metrics for the development. Factor Required Proposed Use Mixed-use Mixed-use Lot Area 2.0 acres minimum 2.89 acres (2.39 after the plat) Residential Density Up to 50 units per acre; higher densities are allowed with a PUD Lot 1: 80.8 units per acre Lot 2: no residential proposed Height No specific limits apply to this property, it is not adjacent to R1 or R2 districts 71.5 ft. tall; a rooftop metal trellis extends to 76.5 ft. tall Off-Street Parking 264 spaces (1/bedroom) 79 spaces (1/250 sq. ft., -10%) 343 spaces total 298 spaces on level P1 and P2 82 spaces on Level 1 380 spaces total Setbacks N/A for PUD Lot 1: (new building) Front (south) – 7 ft. or more Side (west) – 9’10” or more Side (east) – 8’9” or more Rear (north) – 33 ft. or more Lot 2: (existing building) Front (south) – 20 ft. or more Side (west) – 0 ft. Side (east) – 15 ft. or more Rear (north) – 0 ft. Commercial Use of Ground Floor Area N/A for PUD 17,500 sq. ft. new building 4,400 sq. ft. existing remaining Ground Floor Area Ratio N/A for PUD 0.62 D.O.R.A. 11,414 sq. ft. (12% of lot area) 13,579 sq. ft. (14.3%) Tree Replacement 222.1 caliper inches ($130 per caliper inch not planted) Approx. 67 caliper inches + Cash-in-lieu ($20,098) Landscaping 185 trees 56 trees per zoning definition (82 trees actual with 31 over- story and 51 ornamental trees) 1,307 shrubs 423 shrubs 1,243 perennials Alternative landscaping A rooftop amenity courtyard on the 2nd level. Transit service None required Routes 12, 615, 604 Stormwater Required city and watershed standards Stormwater management is provided underground Special Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 2) Page 5 Title: Excelsior & Monterey Redevelopment (Bridgewater/Dominium) Building and Site Design Analysis: The PUD ordinance requires the City to find that the quality of building and site design proposed will substantially enhance aesthetics of the site and implement relevant goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. In addition, the following criteria shall be satisfied: (1) The design shall consider the project as a whole, and shall create a unified environment within project boundaries by ensuring architectural compatibility of all structures, efficient vehicular and pedestrian circulation, aesthetically pleasing landscape and site features, and design and efficient use of utilities. The proposed building is six stories tall with ground floor commercial storefronts and the residential lobby. Residential units occupy the 2nd through sixth floors. The upper stories of the building are in a U-shape that open up to the north side of the site and surrounds a rooftop amenity space on the second level. The building height steps down to three stories on the northwest corner of the building, in order to reduce shadowing impacts. This results in generous balcony spaces for units in this terraced area. On the south façade, the first and sixth levels are recessed at least six feet. On the ground floor, this provides a covered walkway along the storefronts. Having the sixth floor stepped back helps make the building appear to be only five-stories tall from the sidewalk and improves the “human- scale” of the building. Similarly, the sixth level of the building is stepped back at least six feet from the rest of the façade along Monterey Drive. The proposed building uses attractive and quality exterior materials such as brick, glass, stucco and cement board siding. The plan provides an efficient commercial parking level with accesses from Excelsior Boulevard and Monterey Drive. Separate access is provided from Monterey Drive to the lower parking levels that will be used by residents. Limited on-street parking is also available on Excelsior Boulevard. The development provides a quality rooftop amenity space for residents on the second level of the building, which also breaks up the massing of the building on the north side. A six-foot wide landscaped boulevard, sidewalk, and foundation plantings are provided along Monterey Drive. On Excelsior Boulevard, similar to today, there is a sidewalk adjacent to the curb and on-street parking, and landscaped planters are provided between the sidewalk and the covered walkway along the storefronts. (2) The design of a PUD shall achieve compatibility of the project with surrounding land uses, both existing and proposed, and shall minimize the potential adverse impacts of the PUD on surrounding land uses and the potential adverse effects of the surrounding land uses on the PUD. The design extends the urban-like, mixed-use environment established by Excelsior & Grand and other developments surrounding Wolfe Park to this prominent intersection. It continues the commercial use of the ground floor along Excelsior Boulevard and adds residential above. The impacts to neighboring properties of the taller building, such as shadowing, are limited by stepping down the height in some areas. Most of the traffic is directed to Excelsior Boulevard or Monterey Drive, except service vehicles and move-ins which may occur on the north side of the property accessed via 36½ Street and an existing driveway easement. Special Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 2) Page 6 Title: Excelsior & Monterey Redevelopment (Bridgewater/Dominium) (3) A PUD shall comply with the City’s Green Building Policy. The applicant proposes to meet the city’s green building policy and this will be required as a condition of approval. (4) The use of green roofs or white roofs and on-site renewable energy is encouraged. Landscaping will be included on the second floor amenity terrace. On-site renewable energy and white roofs are not proposed. Architectural Design: A general description of the building was provided above. Height: As noted previously, the building is six stories and 71.5 feet tall, with a metal terrace accenting the southwest corner of the building which rises to 76.5 feet tall. On the north side of the site, the building will be closer to eight stories tall (at the current parking lot level) due to the drop in elevation where the lower parking levels are exposed and/or retaining walls are installed. The PUD district has the flexibility to allow taller buildings and smaller setbacks, as the City Council deems appropriate. Pedestrian-level design elements: The ground floor commercial would have storefront windows all along Excelsior Blvd and approximately four direct entrances to the public sidewalk, including a corner entrance into Bridgewater Bank’s proposed space. Storefront windows are also provided along Monterey Drive with an additional entrance on the north end of the Bridgewater bank tenant space and the residential lobby entrance. The PUD ordinance will include transparency requirements for the storefront windows on the ground floor and requirements for the street-side entrances to these spaces be open during normal business hours. Exterior Materials: The exterior materials include at least 60% class one materials on each of the four elevations including, brick, glass, stucco, and fiber cement board lap siding. Other materials include metal panel and rock face block concrete masonry. Shadowing: The shadow study provided by the architect certifies and confirms that the building meets the shadowing requirements. It cannot cast a shadow that covers more than 50 percent of another building wall for a period greater than two hours between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. for more than 60 days of the year. Density: The Mixed Use Comprehensive Plan land use designation allows residential densities up to 50 units per acre, and higher densities may be allowed with a PUD. The density on Lot 1 would be 80.8 units per acre. No residential units are proposed on Lot 2. The overall residential density of both lots combined would be 69.9 units per acre. The appropriateness of the density can be further evaluated based upon projected parking demand/supply and traffic impacts/mitigation. Both are discussed further later in the report. Special Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 2) Page 7 Title: Excelsior & Monterey Redevelopment (Bridgewater/Dominium) The inclusion of affordable housing (20% of the units will be leased at a rate that is affordable to households earning 50% of area median income) contributes to the applicant’s proposal for higher density. Parking: The plan provides 380 parking spaces, which exceeds the minimum requirements of the zoning code. On Level 1 there are 82 parking spaces that serve the new commercial development and the existing bank building that will remain. The zoning code requires 79 spaces for the commercial uses. On Levels P1 and P2, the plan provides 298 parking spaces. The zoning code requires 264 spaces. The plan meets the parking requirements. There is also on-street parking available on Excelsior Boulevard. Access: Vehicles may access the site from three surrounding streets. The ground floor commercial parking has a right-in/right-out access driveway on Excelsior Boulevard. The commercial parking also has a full access driveway on Monterey Drive that is aligned with Park Commons Drive. Another full access driveway on Monterey Drive is provided 140 feet north of Park Commons Drive that serves the two levels of underground parking that building residents would use. Finally, there is a driveway easement that connects to 36th Street West that can be used for service vehicles (waste/recycling collection) or apartment move-ins. The building also has pedestrian access from the adjacent sidewalks and there is a nearby bus stop on Excelsior Boulevard. Traffic: Trip Generation: The development is expected to generate approximately 178 trips (99 in/79 out) during the p.m. peak hour and 1,670 daily trips. Considering the trip generation for existing land uses on site and anticipated pass-by trips, approximately 113 net new p.m. peak hour trips (67 in/46 out) and 1,036 net new daily trips are expected. Traffic studies were conducted as part of the Comprehensive Plan change to mixed use on this site in 2015. The studies concluded that the impact of the proposed development traffic generation will not significantly impact the overall operations for intersections in the area or Excelsior Boulevard. However, at the intersection of Monterey Drive and Park Commons Drive, there would be increased delays for the Park Commons Drive leg of the intersection. Park Commons Drive and Monterey Drive Improvements: This intersection experiences delays, mainly due to left turns heading northbound on Monterey Drive, and results in queues that back up and block the Trader Joe’s parking lot driveway during peak times. During the peak times, the intersection experiences congestion. With the proposed development, the operations of this leg of the intersection will get worse during the peak traffic times. Based on the traffic studies, the City Council has directed staff to include in the capital improvements plan the installation of a dedicated right turn lane on Park Commons Drive. Sixty- percent of the eastbound vehicles turn right at Monterey Drive toward Excelsior Boulevard, so a turn lane would reduce the delay for most vehicles and reduce the queues that block the Trader Joe’s driveway. This improvement, even with added development traffic, is expected to improve the operations for this leg of the intersection that are experienced today. The timing of this improvement has not yet been determined. Special Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 2) Page 8 Title: Excelsior & Monterey Redevelopment (Bridgewater/Dominium) The developer may be required to contribute to the costs of this improvement because of its impact to the level of service. The traffic study and other traffic reviews that occurred in 2015 regarding this area are available for review at http://www.stlouispark.org/proposed-development/bridgewater.html. The Director of Engineering will be available at the meeting to respond to questions. Other minor changes: Staff is recommending that the first on-street parking stall on Excelsior Boulevard located east of Monterey Drive be posted “No Parking” and that the second on-street parking stall be posted “No Parking Loading Zone Only”. Also, staff recommends posting “No Parking Fire Lane” between the two new private driveways on the east side of Monterey Drive. Setbacks: The plan provides building setbacks seven feet or more on the south side, nine feet-ten inches or more on the west side, and eight feet-nine inches or more on the east side, and 33 feet or more on the feet on the north side. In a PUD, buildings may be set up to the property line. To help visualize the building setback on Excelsior Boulevard based on the existing conditions, the first and sixth floors will very closely align with the front of the existing building. The second through fifth floors will overhang the first floor with support post that land just south of the existing north sidewalk along the existing building. Along Monterey Drive, the building will be 16+ feet farther back than the existing building. Designed Outdoor Recreation Area (DORA): The plan provides 14.3% of the lot area for DORA. It meets the minimum 12% requirement on the private rooftop amenity space. In addition, a dog run is also provided on the north side of the site. Additional information about the amenities are provided in the alternative landscaping discussion. Landscaping: The landscaping plan provides 51 of the 185 over-story trees required on the site. There will be 31 over-story trees and 51 ornamental trees planted. (Ornamental trees count as ½ of an over-story tree in the zoning code.) The plan provides 423 of the 1,307 shrubs required. The landscape plan also provides 1,243 perennial grass plantings. These plantings occur in the boulevards, in raised planter beds along the building foundations, along property lines, and in raised planters on the rooftop amenity space. Please note: The L001 Landscape Title Sheet incorrectly calculates the required tree and shrub plantings and tree replacement. This can be reconciled before the City Council meeting. Tree Replacement: A number of trees will be removed to accommodate the planned development. Twenty-five of the trees are considered significant trees under the zoning code and require replacement. The other trees are either undesirable species or too small to be considered significant. The tree replacement requirement is 230 caliper inches. The proposed planting plan provides 135 caliper inches. Therefore, as currently designed, the landscaping plan is 95 caliper inches short of the required tree replacement. The developer may pay a fee in lieu of plantings of $130 per caliper inch ($12,350) to the city’s tree fund for the shortfall. These funds are used to plant trees on public property throughout the city. Waste Storage: The trash is proposed to be managed inside the building. The trash and recycling room locations for the residential will be on the lowest parking level (P2), and there are trash and Special Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 2) Page 9 Title: Excelsior & Monterey Redevelopment (Bridgewater/Dominium) recycling chutes provided to all floors. The commercial trash and recycling will be in an enclosed room on Level 1. The spaces provided would be large enough to accommodate organics recycling if that is pursued by the property owners and managers, which the city encourages. Utilities: The utility plans meet the storm water management and utility requirements. The infrastructure in the area has capacity to serve the proposed use. However, the nearest stormwater main is located in Monterey drive 218 feet north of the site. The plan proposes to extend the main south under Monterey Drive. Staff estimates this work would require a road closure for 2-4 weeks. Other proposed utility connections would cause limited disruptions during construction. The plan will also require Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) review and permits. Lighting: The plans provide exterior lighting for the surface parking lot. The plan appears to meet the requirements at the property lines. However, the average lighting levels on the surface parking lot appear to be slightly higher than code requires. Code requires the average to be between 0.5 to 1.0 foot candles, and it appears the lighting plan would have an average light level of 1.44 foot candles. This will need to be corrected prior to City Council review. PRELIMINARY PLAT WITH VARIANCES ANALYSIS: The preliminary plat combines three existing parcels, creates two new parcels and dedicates right-of-way to surrounding streets where road easements currently exist, and it provides drainage and utility easements surrounding the parcel adjacent to the proposed right-of-way. The plat is named “Bridgewater Dominium Addition”. Lots: Lot 1, Block 1, Bridgewater Dominium Addition will have a lot area of 2.18 acres. This lot is proposed to be developed with a mixed-use building with 17,500 square feet of ground floor commercial and 167 multiple-family residential units with structured parking under the building. This will be a corner lot with frontage on Excelsior Boulevard and Monterey Drive. Lot 2, Block 1, Bridgewater Dominium Addition will have a lot area of 0.21 acres. This lot will contain an existing two-story 4,400 square foot commercial building. The parking for this property will be provided off-site on the first level of the mixed-use building on Lot 1, Block 1 of the same PUD. Right-of-Way Dedication: The preliminary plat will dedicate 0.50 acres of land for road right-of- way to surrounding streets and generally follows the boundaries of existing road easements. Hennepin County reviewed the proposal and did not provide any formal comments. Utility Easements: The plan provides 10-foot wide drainage and utility easements along Excelsior Boulevard and Monterey Drive as required by the Subdivision Ordinance. It also provides 5-foot wide drainage and utility easements along most interior lot lines. The only exception is along the common lot line between Lot 1 and Lot 2 of the proposed plat, where no easement is provided. However, the development plans have encroachments into the drainage and utility easements that are provided on the plat. On the northwest side of the lot, there are retaining walls that range from three to eight feet in height and approximately 155 feet long that are within the easement. On the northeast side of the lot, there is also a retaining wall that ranges from one to ten feet tall and approximately 75 feet long. These may be allowed with encroachment agreement. While the retaining walls will hinder the use to some degree, there would still be value to dedicating the easements on the plat for future use. Special Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 2) Page 10 Title: Excelsior & Monterey Redevelopment (Bridgewater/Dominium) There are also two areas where there are slight encroachments of the building into the 10-foot drainage and utility easements. These are relatively small encroachments, but it is staff’s recommendation that the easements simply be reduced with the variance application in these areas to eliminate the encroachments. On the northwest corner of the lobby entrance, the building encroaches 2 inches. On the southeast corner of the building, about 35 feet of the building strays zero to 3 feet into the easement. Again, a change to the plat is recommended by staff with a subdivision variance. There are existing easements along internal lot lines that will need to be vacated to accommodate the development. There are also existing electric utilities that will need to be relocated by the developer. It is staff’s understanding that the relocated facilities can be accommodated within the easements provided. This will be confirmed prior to any city council hearings relating to the vacation of existing drainage and utility easements. Subdivision Variance Application: The variances are regarding drainage and utility easements on the plat. The plat proposes variances from five feet to zero feet along either side of the shared property line between Lots 1 and 2 of the proposed plat. In addition, variances are needed on Lot 1 from the 10-foot easement requirement down to approximately 9.5 feet along Monterey drive in one isolated location near the proposed lobby, and down to 7 to 9.5 feet for an approximately 35 feet length at the southeast corner of the proposed building along Excelsior Boulevard. Staff offers the following findings: 1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the property such that the strict application of the provisions of this chapter would deprive the applicant/owner of the reasonable use of the land. Lots 1 and 2 are part of the same planned unit development proposal. The sites are intended to operate dependently with shared parking. Both the existing building, and appurtenances to the new building (area well) will have zero setbacks from the common property line. Although the plan provides reductions in the easement widths along Monterey and Excelsior Boulevard, the easements provided are still larger than those provided at similar mixed use developments east of the site, where easements of zero to five feet have been allowed along public streets. 2. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare or injurious to other property in the territory in which property is situated. 3. The variance is to correct inequities resulting from an extreme physical hardship. The topography of the site includes a grade change of up to 20 feet and the development includes an existing building that will be retained and existing retaining walls that will be relocated and replaced as part of the development. 4. The variance is not contrary to the intent of the comprehensive plan. The proposed variance accommodates a mixed-use building consistent with the land use guidance. The proposed easements along Monterey Drive and Excelsior Boulevard expand the area available for public utilities compared to what is available today. Special Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 2) Page 11 Title: Excelsior & Monterey Redevelopment (Bridgewater/Dominium) Based on the above findings, staff recommends approval of the subdivision variances to reduce the width of the drainage and utilities easements in the locations described above. Park and Trail Dedication: The proposed development will increase the intensity of the development on the property. The City will require park and trail dedication fees to be collected for the residential units that are being added to the site. The Park and Recreation Advisory Commission met on February 17, 2016 and recommended collecting cash-in-lieu of land for the park dedication. The current park dedication fee is $1,500 per dwelling unit and the trail dedication fee is $225 per dwelling unit. The fees would total $250,500 and $37,575 for the park and trail dedication respectively. PUBLIC INPUT: Most recently, for the current applications, the developer held a neighborhood information open house on March 3, 2016. Approximately 40 neighbors attended. In general, most of the concerns and questions related to traffic generated from the development, the congestion and delays at the Park Commons Drive intersection with Monterey Drive, and the overall height and scale of the building. A couple of people expressed concerns about the loss of the existing trees. A few people mentioned safety of pedestrian crossings at Park Commons Drive and Monterey. There was also testimony at the public hearing on March 16, 2016. The unofficial meeting Planning Commission meeting minutes are attached. • July 14, 2014 - Project discussed at City Council Study Session • April 13, 2015 - Project Update to City Council Study Session • April 21, 2015 - Neighborhood Meeting • April 23, 2015 - Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing published • May 6, 2015 – Public Hearing • June 1, 2015 - City Council approved Comprehensive Plan Amendment • August 10, 2015 – Excelsior Blvd traffic discussion at City Council Study Session • September 2015 – Traffic mitigation meeting with neighborhood • October 19, 2016 – Traffic mitigation discussion at Monterey Dr. and Park Commons Drive at City Council Study Session • March 3, 2016 – Neighborhood Open House • March 16, 2016 – Planning Commission Public Hearing NEXT STEPS: The Council will consider action on the preliminary plat and preliminary PUD in May. If approved, the Council will need to approve the vacation of existing drainage and utility easements on the property, final plat, final PUD, and the EDA will need to approve the sale of land to the redeveloper. The easement vacations will require a public hearing held by City Council. Several of these actions will require five of seven votes in order to be approved, including the final PUD, easement vacations, and land sale. Special Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 2) Page 12 Title: Excelsior & Monterey Redevelopment (Bridgewater/Dominium) UNOFFICIAL MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA MARCH 16, 2016 – 6:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS MEMBERS PRESENT: Torrey Kanne, Claudia Johnston-Madison, Lisa Peilen, Richard Person, Carl Robertson, MEMBERS ABSENT: Lynne Carper, Joe Tatalovich Ethan Rickert (youth member) STAFF PRESENT: Sean Walther, Debra Heiser, Greg Hunt 1. Call to Order – Roll Call 2. Approval of Minutes of February 17, 2016 and March 2, 2016 Commissioner Person moved approval of the minutes of February 17, 2016. Commissioner Peilen seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 3-2 (Kanne and Robertson abstained). Commissioner Robertson moved approval of the minutes of March 2, 2016. Commissioner Person seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 4-1 (Peilen abstained). 3. Public Hearings A. Excelsior & Monterey (Bridgewater Dominium Addition) Preliminary Plat with Variances and Preliminary Planned Unit Development Location: 4400, 4424 Excelsior Blvd.; 3743 Monterey Dr. Applicant: St. Louis Park Leased Housing Associates I, LLC Case Nos.: 15-32-S, 15-33-PUD, 15-46-VAR Sean Walter, Planning and Zoning Administrator, presented the staff report. He reviewed the request for preliminary plat with variances. The preliminary plat combines three existing parcels to be created into two new parcels and dedicates right-of-way to surrounding streets where road easements currently exist. He explained that the variances regard drainage and utility easement width reduction. Mr. Walther presented the Planned Unit Development analysis including zoning, building/site design, shadow study, parking, access, landscaping, and Designed Outdoor Recreation Area (DORA). Mr. Walther discussed the traffic study in detail. The study incorporates traffic studies of the Bridgewater site, the former Bally’s site and a level of background growth. The Park Commons Dr./Monterey leg of the intersection on Park Commons Dr. (going eastbound) does experience a delay currently and the delay will get worse with the development. Mr. Walther said the City Council directed staff to explore alternatives that might improve Special Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 2) Page 13 Title: Excelsior & Monterey Redevelopment (Bridgewater/Dominium) operations at that particular intersection whether or not the development goes forward. He discussed the option recommended by City Council to add a dedicated right turn lane on Park Commons Dr. With this one improvement it will be improved from a Level of Service D to a Level of Service C with development, which is rated Acceptable. Mr. Walther reviewed the public process associated with the proposed development. Commissioner Peilen asked if the entrance on Excelsior Blvd. was for commercial use only. Mr. Walther responded the Excelsior Blvd. entrance is for commercial use only. Commissioner Peilen asked if the developer ever considered Excelsior Blvd. the primary entrance and exit. Mr. Walther responded he was not aware of any previous designs that considered that option. Commissioner Person asked if the recommended option of Alternative 2 was adopted by resolution. Mr. Walther said it was direction to staff at a study session that the improvement should be included in the city’s Capital Improvement Plan. The CIP will be generated in the coming months. Commissioner Kanne asked if the traffic study went down Excelsior Blvd. towards Hwy. 100 at peak hours and looked at congestion there. Mr. Walther responded that the study results extended to Quentin and Excelsior. He said that congestion at Excelsior/Hwy. 100 has previously been identified in the Comprehensive Plan. He noted there are limited solutions the city has for that. The city has explored using more frequently yellow flashing lights throughout intersections. That could be explored more with Hennepin County as Excelsior is a county road. The city does not have direct control on when and how those improvements are made. Chair Johnston-Madison said approaching the entrance for Level 1 parking for bank and retail to turn in you have to be going west on Excelsior. She asked if the traffic study took into account how much traffic would result off of Monterey from the opposite direction. Mr. Walther said the driveway locations and motions were known and the situation she described was part of the model. The Chair spoke about 50 units/acre and higher densities allowed with PUD. The zoning table indicates there are 80.8 units/acre. Mr. Walther explained that for purposes of the report and presentation he used the higher number for Lot 1 alone. No residential units are proposed on Lot 2. The overall residential density of both lots combined would be 69.9 units/acre. Special Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 2) Page 14 Title: Excelsior & Monterey Redevelopment (Bridgewater/Dominium) Chair Johnston-Madison asked about height perception from the north with underground parking levels resulting in the building looking like eight stories. The Chair asked if any of the eight traffic alternatives, other than Alternate 2, were still in play. Mr. Walther responded that all alternatives were shared with City Council. The staff did not recommend the other alternatives. One of them was the idea of doing a traffic signal at Park Commons Dr. One of the criteria staff used for recommendation was that whatever intervention was made to improve that one leg of Park Commons Dr. would not negatively impact other intersections. Excelsior Blvd. is a major road and needs to take priority over a secondary road. The Chair asked Mr. Walther to address Alternative 8. Mr. Walther said all alternatives were considered and all but three were dismissed. Alternative 8, closing Park Commons Dr., would add a new street going through park land. It would be very expensive, with a number of limitations to pursuing that option. Commissioner Person asked about the north access designated as move in/move out only and easement. Mr. Walther said there is a 20 foot access easement across the nursing home property that connects to the service court in that building. Earlier concepts explored the idea of splitting traffic so all of the P2 parking would exit and enter that site from the driveway. By dispersing the traffic in that manner it makes all intersections better. There were concerns from the nursing home about how wide of a space is available there for emergency vehicles. Residents also raised objections to additional traffic on 36 ½ St. The developer is not proposing to have additional access to that location. Chair Johnston-Madison referred to page 19 of the traffic study regarding access B and C proposed to be 140 ft. apart along Monterey Dr. She referred to MnDOT spacing guidelines of 330 ft. for urban collector roadways. She asked if the City Council discussed those figures. Mr. Walther said City Council was presented that information but it was not discussed in any detail. Debra Heiser, Engineering Director, said the figures were noted in the traffic study and presented to the City Council. She stated that the reality on urban arterials and collectors is if 330 ft. were applied to every driveway access in the city many driveways would have to be closed. When looking at the speed of the street and the vehicles using these driveways staff feels that 140 ft. is adequate for the site lines, adequate for safety and adequate for these driveways on Monterey. She said staff would not support it otherwise. Ron Mehl, Dominium Development, applicant, spoke about the company and the development proposal. He said they have worked hard to address concerns and worked hard to create two separate entrances for commercial space and residential parking. He answered commissioner questions regarding resident and guest parking. Special Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 2) Page 15 Title: Excelsior & Monterey Redevelopment (Bridgewater/Dominium) Chair Johnston-Madison opened the public hearing. A letter from William Weber, 3824 Huntington, was read into the record by Dennis Morin, 4509 W. 36 ½ St., #303. In his letter Mr. Weber urged the commission to reject the applications for preliminary plat and preliminary PUD for the proposed development. Eleanore Martin, 4820 Park Commons Dr., #233, said with the large apartment building going up at the former Bally’s site she didn’t understand why another large complex was needed at Excelsior and Monterey. She said she understood the city fathers believe in encouraging small businesses so it makes no sense to force out established businesses, such as TechLine, to make room for a complex that nobody wants. She said Excelsior Blvd. will look like a cross between a wind tunnel and a traffic jam. Jan Anderson, 4517 W. 36 ½ St., said besides traffic and noise she is concerned about trees being removed which are homes to wildlife. She said she is concerned about the small businesses that have been asked to leave. She said they won’t come back. She said two businesses have gone to Edina. She commented that the commercial spaces will be boring things that people won’t spend much time enjoying. Ms. Anderson said in the past the walk from Monterey to Slumberland has been fun. There are trees and the businesses are fun. That will all be gone. She said she is concerned that her own rent will increase due to the development. Denise Davis, 4820 Park Commons Dr. condominium, Wolfe Park neighborhood association vice chair, said neighbors are concerned about traffic, increased crime, congestion and dropping property values. Transients will be moving in. She said she has lived in St. Louis Park for 32 years. Neighbors tell her that they are unwilling to give up their cars. People in her building are a little bit older. Some have impediments and can’t walk to a light rail station. She spoke about pedestrians often crossing Excelsior illegally. The neighborhood is growing very rapidly. She said she’d like to see a moratorium on any future development until the ramifications are known about traffic, congestion and parking at 4900 Excelsior. Patti Carlson, 3801 Inglewood Ave. S., 40 year resident, said she feels betrayed by the city for this development. In spite of the traffic study, it is very difficult to cross Excelsior Blvd. because of people turning left into Trader Joe’s and sometimes turning right into the small businesses. Trader Joe’s is a mess. Now there will be another situation with two uncontrolled opposing streets. It feels a lot like Wooddale to her. She said she can understand having a dedicated left and right turn lane. But she said there are problems with being in right turn lane and the left turn driver edges forward resulting in difficulty telling if the other drive can go forward. She requested no yellow arrows for crossing Excelsior. She said it is dangerous enough as it is and the pedestrian crossing signal is the only protection pedestrians have crossing Excelsior. She said she feels her neighborhood is blocked off from getting to Highway 100 or the library. She said the traffic study wasn’t done on a Saturday afternoon near Trader Joe’s. She spoke about lack of light in the winter and ground floor units. She said she didn’t find the shadow studies acceptable. She said she didn’t appreciate the traffic study ratings of acceptable. She said she would like the consideration of the human effects of this development. Special Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 2) Page 16 Title: Excelsior & Monterey Redevelopment (Bridgewater/Dominium) Terry Warner, 3020 Florida Ave. S., said the proposed development is being built in the wrong place. He spoke about the vacant areas between Hwy. 100 and Hwy. 169 on Minnetonka Blvd. that would have less traffic problems and good bus service for development. He suggested the use of roundabouts on Monterey. Meghan Phimister, 3451 Zarthan Ave., 30 year resident, asked if the commercial parking level and residential parking levels were accessible to each other. Ron Mehl, applicant, said residential parking, except for guest parking, is connected inside the ramp that drops down under the commercial space. Residents can enter the building from the ramp by fob access only. Ms. Phimister discussed the petition with 330 resident signatures which residents gave to the City Council about one year ago. She said that night the city went ahead with its vision for Excelsior and Monterey. Tonight the city is hearing the neighborhood vision for the corner. She hoped the city could listen and take a step back look back to look at this area and the surrounding area. She spoke about the new ice rink and a new community center which will create more traffic. She said every time she comes to the city she’s discussing little individual projects and is concerned the city doesn’t look at the entire view. People are concerned about infrastructure, mobility, walkability and over-saturation of apartments. She said she lives close to the PLACE proposal right on 7 and Wooddale and struggles with commuting through that area to get to Trader Joe’s and then has to deal with the traffic there. She said she hopes the Commission comes to talk about PLACE and doesn’t support moving forward with that project because that is being pushed in as well. Alberto Bertomeu, 4419 Excelsior Blvd., said it is an emotional issue and it takes time for listening and venting. He said he isn’t for or against the project. He said he owns buildings surrounding the property. Honey and Rye is a small business succeeding in an area of larger projects. Ciel has signed a lease for his property across the street. Techline moved to Edina when it merged with another company. He said he is trying to keep some small businesses intact. He said he owns the Jiffy Carwash. He spoke about the good design and scale of the Bridgewater Bank building. He said he knows traffic is a problem. He spoke about difficulties for pedestrian crossing of Excelsior and Boulevard and general lack of respect shown to pedestrians by drivers. Phil Freshman, 3912 Natchez, 25 year resident, spoke about very little consideration for people living in the area. There is the ice rink, 4900 Excelsior, and now Bridgewater development. There are impacts collectively to this area. He said the fixes on Park Commons Dr. are a band-aid. He said he doesn’t hear anything about ameliorations in the neighborhoods. He spoke of Natchez which is used by vehicles going 40 mph to avoid Excelsior Blvd. On his block there are about 15 kids under age 12. The proposal is misguided and it is about raising property tax income to invest for the ice rink and other projects. He said it is tremendously harmful in general. He said had he known about the petition he would have signed it. He hopes the petition can be recirculated. The city is imposing the developments on the neighborhood and saying the neighborhood should deal with it. Jon Schaefer, 3914 Lynn, resident since 1965, asked what evidence the commission doesn’t already have in the last two years that will allow for a no vote for the development. 330 Special Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 2) Page 17 Title: Excelsior & Monterey Redevelopment (Bridgewater/Dominium) petitions? Has it been looked at and listened to? How tall is too tall for a development? How much congestion is too much congestion for the neighborhood? How does a luxury apartment building help St. Louis Park residents who want to stay but are unable to stay because they can’t afford the apartments? How does it help small businesses stay in St. Louis Park? Nino Pedrely, 3755 Glenhurst Ave., 10 year resident, discussed Tax Increment Financing (TIF). He asked why projects in a fairly established neighborhood can’t be done on a market rate basis since we’re at the top of the apartment development cycle. Mr. Walther stated there isn’t a TIF application at this stage. There are no details for any agreement at this time. Greg Hunt, Economic Development Coordinator, spoke about a typical TIF project where the base taxes would continue to accrue to the respective taxing jurisdiction. It is the added value from the development that potentially could be used to reimburse the developer for certain extraordinary costs incurred in the development. He said the city has a policy in which projects are required to pay for the fiscal disparities from the project itself. Dennis Morin, 4509 W. 36 ½ St, #303, 39 year resident, asked the developer if Access B and C have changed or if they are the same as originally proposed. Mr. Mehl, applicant, responded that Access B and C have not changed. Mr. Morin asked if 83% of the apartments are 1 or 2 bedroom units. He asked how many of the units are affordable. Chair Johnston-Madison said 20% of the units are affordable. Mr. Morin distributed a document titled 4400 Exc. Blvd. Traffic Study, May 1, 2015. Access B and C are proposed 140 feet apart along Monterey Dr. He referenced MnDOT spacing guidelines of 330 feet. Debra Heiser, Engineering Director, spoke about the guideline. Staff looked at vehicles on Monterey and determined that 140 ft. spacing is adequate. There are a number of driveways like this in the city. Staff does not find this will be unsafe. It can move ahead as it is. Ms. Heiser said it is important, as the developer indicated, to separate the residential and commercial accesses. Mr. Morin said Monterey is a major collector of 11,000 cars/day in an urban area which is a lot different from driveways in a residential neighborhood. He discussed B and C access with six left turns and six right turns all in 140 feet on Monterey. He said it is an atypical area with one Excelsior & Grand, one Trader Joe’s and one Bridgewater. He said it is an unsafe and tightly compressed driveway access plan and they ask the Commission to deny approval of the PUD and ask the staff and developer to create a safer and more improved site access plan so the project can move forward. Ron Mehl, applicant, said they will look at the accesses again but believe that the access to the north is a sufficient distance and will provide good visibility to the residents coming Special Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 2) Page 18 Title: Excelsior & Monterey Redevelopment (Bridgewater/Dominium) out of it. He said they will do more studies on that to share with the City Council. The existing businesses have not expressed an interest in staying and they will have the opportunity to lease in that space if they choose. He said he understands there will be a rent difference. He doesn’t know what that amount is right now. Extensive criminal and credit background checks are done on their residents. Dominium does not have a crime problem in any of their developments. He said they will try work on illegal pedestrian crossing and will address that with planters and landscaping and trying as best they can to direct pedestrian traffic to intersections from this development. The new development will help in particular with affordability so that people are not priced out of this community. There are 35 units for persons making up to 50% of median income in Hennepin County. 48% of the units are one bedroom, 48% are two bedroom and 4% are 3 bedroom. The Chair added into the record correspondence from Russell Redman, 3833 Kipling Ave. S. Mr. Redman wrote in opposition to the development. Chair Johnston-Madison closed the public hearing as no one else was present wishing to speak. Commissioner Robertson said it is the kind of application the Commission struggles with. We hear the neighborhood concerns and opposition. In reference to moratorium, he said the city is coming to the time of doing its Comprehensive Plan again and a lot has happened in the last 10 years. It would be good to restudy the whole area and see where it wants to go. In the meantime, it is owner’s right to sell property and develop it. He discussed pedestrian concerns. He said in his business as an architect he works with engineers all the time and there is a certain amount of trust in the models that are used. He said the project is well-designed, well sited, and the stepping down design is good along Monterey. He uses shadow studies all of the time. He said he will give a move ahead vote. Commissioner Peilen said she has also struggled as she hears the concerns. She spoke about development in her own neighborhood. She knows Dominium’s work and it has a good reputation and runs good buildings without problems. The design is good and the project is well thought through. She said with numerous reservations she is willing to give it a move ahead vote. Commissioner Person spoke about the problems with left turns out of Access A and B. He said in the future the city would have to consider prohibiting those left turns. Developing the north access into a full residential access would mitigate a lot of that problem. He said he hears the neighborhood issues but the Commission needs to determine if the proposal conforms with the PUD ordinance. Commissioner Kanne said it is a livability issue. She said no one she has spoken to in St. Louis Park likes the project. She stated she doesn’t like small businesses leaving and she doesn’t like cookie cutter buildings going up. She said she has serious reservations and will probably vote in opposition to the project. The Chair said it is a quality project with a good developer. She said her position hasn’t changed since the Comprehensive Plan request. She said if the development had come out of a development guidelines process created like the one for Excelsior & Grand and for the Ellipse site, she would have a different perspective on this development. Development Special Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 2) Page 19 Title: Excelsior & Monterey Redevelopment (Bridgewater/Dominium) guidelines have been worked on for the south side of Excelsior Blvd. and some good things are in place. She said there are no development guidelines for the north side of Excelsior from Ellipse to Monterey. It was asked for by residents almost a year ago. She said she has concerns about traffic. Chair Johnston-Madison said we need to look at, at least in this community, not just capacity on a road but the quality of life for people in that area. If we want Excelsior Blvd., Excelsior and Monterey, 36 ½ St. and Belt Line Blvd. to be a walkable community we are going the wrong way. She said she would not be voting in favor. Commissioner Robertson made a motion recommending approval of the Preliminary Plat with Subdivision Variances and Preliminary Planned Unit Development (PUD) with meeting notes and comments provided to Council. Commissioner Person seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 3-2 (Johnston-Madison and Kanne opposed). Site Landscape Plan 0 20 40 80 Special Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 2) Title: Excelsior & Monterey Redevelopment (Bridgewater/Dominium)Page 20 Site Landscape Plan 0 20 40 80 Special Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 2) Title: Excelsior & Monterey Redevelopment (Bridgewater/Dominium)Page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pecial Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 2) Title: Excelsior & Monterey Redevelopment (Bridgewater/Dominium)Page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pecial Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 2) Title: Excelsior & Monterey Redevelopment (Bridgewater/Dominium)Page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ay/ August 21stSeptember/ March 21stNovember /January 21November /January 21 9 AM 11 AM 1 PM 3 PM Note: All new multiple-family and nonresidential buildings and additions thereto shall be located so that the structure does not cast a shadow that covers more than 50 percent of another building wall for a period greater than two hours between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. for more than 60 days of the year. SHADOW STUDY 2 50% TOTAL 3700 SF IN SHADOW 1850 SF Special Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 2) Title: Excelsior & Monterey Redevelopment (Bridgewater/Dominium)Page 24 T r a c t D DATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NO. CERTIFICATION License Number 2014 BKV Group, Inc. EOEC I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional under the laws of the State of Minnesota. SHEET NUMBER CONSULTANTS KEY PLAN PROJECT TITLE NORTH ARROW SHEET TITLE BKVTB-30x42EXCELSIOR & MONTEREY Engineer REVISION DATE PUD RESUBMITTAL 02/26/16 ISSUANCE Date XX/XX/1649933 PJ Disch, PE LOUCKS 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL PUD RESUBMITTAL 01/22/16 LOUCKS PROJECT NO. 14634 PUD RESUBMITTAL 02/26/16 EXISTING CONDITIONS C1-1 MJS/PJD PJD 06/04/15 N EXISTING CONDITIONS GENERAL NOTES 1. THE INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN WAS PREPARED FROM A BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY PREPARED BY SUNDE LAND SURVEYING AND DATED JANUARY 2, 2015. UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN, SUCH AS SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN, STORM SEWER, FORCEMAIN, ETC. WAS PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK RECORD PLANS. 2. THE GEOTECHNICAL AND SOILS INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN WAS PROVIDED BY NORTHERN TECHNOLOGIES, INC., REPORT DATED APRIL 24, 2015. 3. WE HAVE SHOWN BURIED STRUCTURES AND UTILITIES ON AND/OR SERVING THE SITE TO THE BEST OF OUR ABILITY, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING RESTRICTIONS: A. UTILITY OPERATORS DO NOT CONSISTENTLY RESPOND TO LACATE REQUESTS THROUGH THE GOPHER STATE ONE CALL SERVICE FOR BOUNDARY AND LOCATION PURPOSES SUCH AS THIS. B. THOSE UTILITY OPERATORS THAT DO RESPOND, OFTEN WILL NOT LOCATE SERVICES FROM THE MAIN LINE TO THE CUSTOMER'S STRUCTURE OR FACILITY - THEY CONSIDER THOSE SEGMENTS PRIVATE INSTALLATIONS THAT ARE OUTSIDE OF THEIR JURISDICTION. IF A PRIVATE SERVICE TO AN ADJOINER'S SITE CROSSES THIS SITE OR A SERVICE TO THIS SITE CROSSES AN ADJOINER, IT MAY NOT BE LOCATED SINCE MOST OPERATORS WILL NOT MARK SUCH "PRIVATE" SERVICES. C. SNOW AND ICE CONDITIONS DURING WINTER MONTHS MAY OBSCURE OTHERWISE VISIBLE EVIDENCE OF A BURIED STRUCTURE OR UTILITY. D. MAPS PROVIDED BY UTILITY OPERATORS, EITHER ALONG WITH A FIELD LOCATION OR IN LIEU OF SUCH A LOCATION, ARE VERY OFTEN INACCURATE OR INCONCLUSIVE. MAPS PROVIDED BY UTILITY OPERATORS ARE VERY OFTEN AT A VERY SMALL SCALE, OR NO SCALE. E. EXTREME CAUTION MUST BE EXERCISED BEFORE AN EXCAVATION TAKES PLACE ON OR NEAR THE SITE. BEFORE DIGGING, YOU ARE REQUIRED BY LAW TO NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE AT 651-454-0002. WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. SCALE IN FEET 0 30 60 03/08/2016 Special Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 2) Title: Excelsior & Monterey Redevelopment (Bridgewater/Dominium)Page 25 T r a c t D REMOVE BITUMINOUS REMOVE BITUMINOUS REMOVE BITUMINOUS DEMOLISH & REMOVE EXISTING BUILDING IN IT'S ENTIRETY. INCLUDING FOOTINGS, FOUNDATIONS, OVERHANGS, STAIRS, STOOPS, & UTILITY METERS REMOVE POWER POLE AND OVERHEAD POWER LINES. COORDINATE WITH UTILITY OWNER FOR RELOCATION OF POWER LINES TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. TREE REMOVAL TYP PROTECT EXISTING BUILDING FROM DAMAGE PROTECT EXISTING BUILDING FROM DAMAGE COORDINATE WITH STRUCTURAL AND ARCHITECTURAL FOR LOCATION OF PROPOSED WALL BELOW EXISTING BANK SAWCUT AND REMOVE PAVEMENT & CURB AND GUTTER AS NECESSARY FOR PROPOSED STORM SEWER. REPLACE IN KIND SAWCUT BITUMINOUS AT PROPERTY LINE SAWCUT AND REMOVE PAVEMENT & CURB AND GUTTER AS NECESSARY FOR PROPOSED WATER SERVICES. REPLACE IN KIND REMOVE EXISTING 42" STORM SEWER DATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NO. CERTIFICATION License Number 2014 BKV Group, Inc. EOEC I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional under the laws of the State of Minnesota. SHEET NUMBER CONSULTANTS KEY PLAN PROJECT TITLE NORTH ARROW SHEET TITLE BKVTB-30x42EXCELSIOR & MONTEREY Engineer REVISION DATE PUD RESUBMITTAL 02/26/16 ISSUANCE Date XX/XX/1649933 PJ Disch, PE LOUCKS 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL PUD RESUBMITTAL 01/22/16 LOUCKS PROJECT NO. 14634 PUD RESUBMITTAL 02/26/16 MJS/PJD PJD 06/04/15 N WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. SITE DEMOLITION PLAN C1-2 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE AND/OR RELOCATE EXISTING PRIVATE UTILITIES AS NECESSARY. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE ACTIVITIES WITH UTILITY COMPANIES. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE FEATURES NOT NOTED FOR REMOVAL. 3. CONTRACTOR TO CLEAR AND GRUB EXISTING VEGETATION WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS, STRIP TOP SOIL, AND STOCKPILE ON-SITE. REFER TO GRADING PLAN AND SWPPP FOR SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS. 4. CLEAR AND GRUB AND REMOVE ALL TREES, VEGETATION AND SITE DEBRIS PRIOR TO GRADING. ALL REMOVED MATERIAL SHALL BE HAULED FROM THE SITE DAILY. ALL CLEARING AND GRUBBING AND REMOVALS SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY ESTABLISHED UPON REMOVAL. SEE THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP). 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL SITE SURFACE FEATURES WITHIN REMOVAL LIMITS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SITE DEMOLITION NOTES DEMOLITION LEGEND: REMOVE EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVING REMOVE EXISTING BUILDINGS REMOVE EXISTING FENCE, CURB & GUTTER & RETAINING WALL REMOVE EXISTING UTILITIES REMOVE EXISTING MANHOLES, LIGHT POLES, PEDESTALS, ETC. REMOVE EXISTING TREES REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE PAVING/WALKS KEY NOTE LEGEND SCALE IN FEET 0 30 60 NOTE ALL EXISTING SEWER AND WATER SERVICES WILL NEED TO BE DISCONNECTED AT CITY MAIN PER CITY STANDARDS. COORDINATE WITH CITY FOR EXACT LOCATIONS. 03/08/2016 Special Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 2) Title: Excelsior & Monterey Redevelopment (Bridgewater/Dominium)Page 26 3 STAIRS 3 STAIRS 4 STAIRS B 612 CURB & GUTTER B 612 CURB & GUTTER B 612 CURB & GUTTER 4 STAIRS SEE ARCHITECTURAL FOR SIDEWALK HATCHING SEE ARCHITECTURAL FOR PARKING RAMP DETAIL 24.0' 25.0'BITUMINOUS PED RAMP CONCRETE WALK (TYP) CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT (TYP) 6 . 0 ' SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR PLANTINGS BITUMINOUS RETAINING WALL (TYP) SEE GRADING PLAN FOR ELEVATIONS. SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS AND ARCHITECTURAL FOR BLOCK TYPE AND COLOR. TRANSFORMER PAD 22.0' RETAINING WALL (TYP) SEE GRADING PLAN FOR ELEVATIONS. SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS AND ARCHITECTURAL FOR BLOCK TYPE AND COLOR. STRUCTURAL RETAINING WALL. SEE STRUCTURAL FOR DETAILS. LOADING ZONE 6. 0 REPLACE PAVEMENT SECTION TO MATCH EXISTING FOR PROPOSED STORM SEWER 6 . 0 ' 6. 0 NO PARKING EMERGENCY VEHICLE PARKING ONLY BETWEEN SIGNS (50') REPLACE PAVEMENT SECTION & CURB AND GUTTER TO MATCH EXISTING FOR PROPOSED WATER SERVICES DATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NO. CERTIFICATION License Number 2014 BKV Group, Inc. EOEC I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional under the laws of the State of Minnesota. SHEET NUMBER CONSULTANTS KEY PLAN PROJECT TITLE NORTH ARROW SHEET TITLE BKVTB-30x42EXCELSIOR & MONTEREY Engineer REVISION DATE PUD RESUBMITTAL 02/26/16 ISSUANCE Date XX/XX/1649933 PJ Disch, PE LOUCKS 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL PUD RESUBMITTAL 01/22/16 LOUCKS PROJECT NO. 14634 PUD RESUBMITTAL 02/26/16 MJS/PJD PJD 06/04/15 N WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. SITE PLAN C2-1 SITE PLAN LEGEND CONCRETE SIDEWALK HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT SITE PLAN GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL PAVING, CONCRETE CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DETAILS SHOWN PER SHEET C8-1 AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. SEE LANDSCAPE AND ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR ANY ADDITIONAL HARDSCAPE APPLICATIONS. 2. THE CITY DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING AND BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPT. AND THE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY WORK WITHIN THE STREET RIGHT OF WAY (SIDEWALK, STREET OR DRIVEWAYS) 3. MINNESOTA STATE STATUTE REQUIRES NOTIFICATION PER "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY GRADING, EXCAVATION OR UNDERGROUND WORK. 4. SEE CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS FOR ANY REMOVAL DETAILS. 5. ANY SIGN OR FIXTURES REMOVED WITH IN THE RIGHT OF WAY OR AS PART OF THE SITE WORK SHALL BE REPLACED BY THE CONTRACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY REQUIREMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PRESERVE AND MAINTAIN ANY EXISTING STREET LIGHTS AND TRAFFIC SIGNS PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. 6. LEAR AND GRUB AND REMOVE ALL TREES, VEGETATION AND SITE DEBRIS PRIOR TO GRADING. ALL REMOVED MATERIAL SHALL BE HAULED FROM THE SITE DAILY. ALL CLEARING AND GRUBBING AND REMOVALS SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY ESTABLISHED UPON REMOVAL. (SEE SHEET C3-1) 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO OBTAIN ALL PERMITS FROM THE CITY AS REQUIRED FOR ALL WORK WITH THE STREET AND PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. 8. A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF SITE IMPROVEMENTS NOT SHOWN ON THIS SHEET ARE DESCRIBED AND PROVIDED IN FURTHER DETAIL ON THE ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPE PLANS. THIS INCLUDES LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND OTHER FIXTURES. 9. B612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE EDGE OF ALL COMMON DRIVES AND PARKING LOTS. THE CURB SHALL BE TAPERED AND DROPPED TO VALLEY GUTTER ACROSS INDIVIDUAL DRIVEWAY ENTRANCES. 10. CONSTRUCTION NOTES: A. PEDESTRIAN RAMPS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE LOCATIONS SHOWN AND AS SHOWN PER THE LANDSCAPE SITE PLANS. B. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SAW-CUT BITUMINOUS AND CONCRETE PAVEMENTS AS REQUIRED PER THE SPECIFICATIONS. REMOVE EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER AND INSTALL B618 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER. 11. SEE SHEETS C3-1 AND C4-1 FOR GRADING AND UTILITIES. 12. ALL CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER B612, CITY'S STANDARD PLATES. (SEE DETAIL SHEET). 13. THE INTENT OF THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION IS TO PRESERVE AS MUCH OF THE EXISTING STREET PAVEMENT AS POSSIBLE, AND TO MILL AND OVERLAY. REMOVED PAVEMENT AREAS AND PATCHING SHALL BE INSTALLED PER PAVEMENT SECTION PROVIDED PER DETAIL SHEET. SCALE IN FEET 0 30 60 03/08/2016 Special Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 2) Title: Excelsior & Monterey Redevelopment (Bridgewater/Dominium)Page 27 TW=890.00 GW=879.00 TW=887.00 GW=879.00 TW=887.00 GW=878.00 TW=882.00 GW=878.00 TW=881.00 GW=878.00 TW=882.00 GW=878.00 TW=887.50 GW=878.00 TW=887.50 GW=880.00 TW=887.50 GW=880.00 TW=888.00 GW=877.50 TW=894.50 GW=894.50 TW=888.00 GW=877.50 TW=899.00 GW=878.90 TW=887.20 GW=879.50 TW=887.00 GW=877.70 TW=883.00 GW=879.80 TW=881.00 GW=879.80 TW=883.00 GW=878.50 TW=881.00 GW=878.50 5% 5%TW=890.00 GW=879.00 TW=887.00 GW=879.00 TW=887.00 GW=878.00 TW=882.00 GW=878.00 TW=881.00 GW=878.00 TW=882.00 GW=878.00 TW=887.50 GW=878.00 TW=887.50 GW=880.00 TW=887.50 GW=880.00 TW=888.00 GW=877.50 TW=894.50 GW=894.50 TW=888.00 GW=877.50 TW=899.00 GW=878.90 TW=887.20 GW=879.50 TW=887.00 GW=877.70 TW=883.00 GW=879.80 TW=881.00 GW=879.80 TW=883.00 GW=878.50 TW=881.00 GW=878.50 5% 5% CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE THAT DRAINAGE FROM ADJACENT BUILDINGS AND LANDSCAPED AREA CONTINUES TO DRAIN TO THE NORTH. KEEP DRAINAGE FROM GOING TO PROPOSED TRENCH DRAIN DATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NO. CERTIFICATION License Number 2014 BKV Group, Inc. EOEC I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional under the laws of the State of Minnesota. SHEET NUMBER CONSULTANTS KEY PLAN PROJECT TITLE NORTH ARROW SHEET TITLE BKVTB-30x42EXCELSIOR & MONTEREY Engineer REVISION DATE PUD RESUBMITTAL 02/26/16 ISSUANCE Date XX/XX/1649933 PJ Disch, PE LOUCKS 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL PUD RESUBMITTAL 01/22/16 LOUCKS PROJECT NO. 14634 PUD RESUBMITTAL 02/26/16 MJS/PJD PJD 04/08/15 N WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. GRADING PLAN C3-1 GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF BUILDINGS, VESTIBULES, SLOPED PAVING, EXIT PORCHES, RAMPS, TRUCK DOCKS, ENTRY LOCATIONS AND LOCATIONS OF DOWNSPOUTS. 2. ALL DISTURBED UNPAVED AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE MINIMUM OF 6 INCHES OF TOP SOIL AND SOD OR SEED. THESE AREAS SHALL BE WATERED BY THE CONTRACTOR UNTIL THE SOD OR SEED IS GROWING IN A HEALTHY MANNER. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF THIS PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES OCCURRING DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF THIS PROJECT. 4. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGMEN AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. PLACEMENT OF THESE DEVICES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO THE APPROPRIATE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARDS. 5. IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERALLY ACCEPTED CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES, THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE SOLELY AND COMPLETELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE, INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY DURING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. THIS REQUIREMENT WILL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS. 6. THE DUTY OF THE ENGINEER OR THE DEVELOPER TO CONDUCT CONSTRUCTION REVIEW OF THE CONTRACTORS PERFORMANCE IS NOT INTENDED TO INCLUDE REVIEW OF THE ADEQUACY OF THE CONTRACTORS SAFETY MEASURES IN, OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 7. BEFORE BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL A TEMPORARY ROCK ENTRANCE PAD AT ALL POINTS OF VEHICLE EXIT FROM THE PROJECT SITE. SAID ROCK ENTRANCE PAD SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT. SEE DETAILS SHOWN ON SHEET C8-1 & c8-2 OF THE PROJECT PLANS. 8. EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE ESTABLISHED AROUND THE ENTIRE SITE PERIMETER AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH NPDES PERMIT REQUIREMENTS, BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES, CITY REQUIREMENTS AND THE DETAILS SHOWN ON SHEET C3-2 OF THE PROJECT PLANS. 9. ALL ENTRANCES AND CONNECTIONS TO CITY STREETS SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL PERMITS AND NOTIFICATIONS AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY. 10. SEE UTILITY PLAN AND STORM SEWER PROFILES FOR FURTHER DETAIL REGARDING THE STORM SEWER. SCALE IN FEET 0 30 60 03/08/2016 Special Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 2) Title: Excelsior & Monterey Redevelopment (Bridgewater/Dominium)Page 28 218' - 48" STORM @ 2.12 % 65' - 15" STORM @ 0.59 % 6' - 10" STORM @ 0.40 % 10" PVC INV=883.00 CONNECT PROPOSED 48" RCP TO EX. 48" STORM INV. AT EXISTING INV. 873.13 (INVERT TO BE VERIFIED BY CONTRACTOR) STMH 7 RIM=893.00 INV=877.75 E (15") INV=880.32 SE (42") INV=877.75 NW (48") STMH 6 RIM=892.60 INV=878.13 E INV=878.13 W INV=882.98 S 10" INV=879.00 S 4" 68' - 15" STORM @ 0.40 % STMH 5 RIM=888.85 INV=878.40 48" STORM VAULT (3) 80' - 48" PERFORATED CMP @ 0.00% WITH HEADERS INV=880.50 ROCK INV=880.00 SAND INV=879.00 4" DRAINTILE INV=879.00 12 INV=883.50 12" INV=883.00 76' - 15" STORM @ 0.40 % 23' - 12" STORM @ 9.13 % 21' - 12" STORM @ 1.50% 15' - 15" STORM @ 0.40 % STMH 4 RIM=887.3 INV=878.70 STMH 3 RIM=887.30 INV=878.76 STMH 2 RIM=887.30 INV=878.89 33' - 15" STORM @ 0.40 % 28' - 15" STORM @ 0.40 % STMH 1 RIM=887.20 INV=879.00 SW INV=882.73 NE 10" INV=879.00 NE 4" 48" STORM VAULT (4) 60' - 48" PERFORATED CMP @ 0.00% WITH HEADERS INV=880.50 ROCK INV=880.00 SAND INV=879.00 4" DRAINTILE INV=879.00 10"PVC INV=882.75 5' - 10" STORM @ 0.40 % 12" STORM STUB INV=883.35 12" INV=883.25 4" STORM STUB INV=883.35 TRENCH DRAIN TO BE PUMPED OUT 5' - 12" STORM @ 2.00 % 12" STORM STUB INV=883.32 TRENCH DRAIN 11 RIM=887.30 INV=886.30 SW INV=885.60 NE TRENCH DRAIN 12 RIM=876.80 INV=875.80 SE INV=875.00 NW TO BE PUMPED OUT SEE MECHANICAL SANITARY SERVICE PARKING LEVELS TO BE PUMPED OUT COORDINATE WITH MECHANICAL FOR PIPE SIZE SANITARY MANHOLE BUILD OVER EXCISTING SANITARY MAIN RIM=897.30 INV=887.01 SW INV=887.20 NE INV=887.01NW 6" DOMESTIC SERVICE 8" FIRE SERVICE CONNECT INTO EXISTING WATERMAIN PER CITY STANDARDS WITH GATE VALVES 5' - 4" PVC @ 2.00 % 4" INV=883.25 DATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NO. CERTIFICATION License Number 2014 BKV Group, Inc. EOEC I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional under the laws of the State of Minnesota. SHEET NUMBER CONSULTANTS KEY PLAN PROJECT TITLE NORTH ARROW SHEET TITLE BKVTB-30x42EXCELSIOR & MONTEREY Engineer REVISION DATE PUD RESUBMITTAL 02/26/16 ISSUANCE Date XX/XX/1649933 PJ Disch, PE LOUCKS 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL PUD RESUBMITTAL 01/22/16 LOUCKS PROJECT NO. 14634 PUD RESUBMITTAL 02/26/16 MJS/PJD PJD 04/08/15 N WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. UTILITY PLAN C4-1 UTILITY PLAN GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND WATERMAIN UTILITIES SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPECIFICATIONS, THE CITY AND THE STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATION OF THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM), 1999 EDITION. ALL HDPE CONNECTIONS TO CONCRETE MANHOLES SHALL BE CONNECTED WITH AN INTERNAL RUBBER GASKET OR BY USING ADS WATERSTOP GASKET. ALL SANITARY SEWER MAIN LINE SHALL BE SDR 35. ALL SANITARY SEWER SERVICES SHALL BE SDR 26. 2. SEE SHEET C8-1 AND THE CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS FOR SPECIFIC UTILITY DETAILS AND UTILITY SERVICE DETAILS. 3. ALL UTILITY PIPE BEDDING SHALL BE COMPACTED SAND OR FINE GRANULAR MATERIAL PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. ALL COMPACTION SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CEAM SPECIFICATION. 4. ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. THE CITY DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING AND BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT AND THE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER MUST BE NOTIFIED AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY WORK WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, OR WORK IMPACTING PUBLIC UTILITIES. 5. ALL SANITARY SEWER AND WATER SERVICES SHALL TERMINATE AT THE PROPERTY LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO PERFORMING ANY EXCAVATION OR UNDERGROUND WORK. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD ADJUST WATERMAIN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER, AND SERVICES AS REQUIRED. INSULATION OF WATER AND SANITARY SEWER LINES SHALL BE PROVIDED WHERE 7.5 FEET MINIMUM DEPTH CAN NOT BE ATTAINED. 8. ALL STREET REPAIRS AND PATCHING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE ALL SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED AUTHORITY OF OF THE CITY. 9. ALL NEW WATERMAIN MUST HAVE A MINIMUM OF 7.5 FEET OF COVER. 10. ADJUST ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES, BOTH PUBLIC AND PRIVATE TO THE PROPOSED GRADES WHERE DISTURBED AND COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE UTILITY OWNERS. STRUCTURES BEING RESET TO PAVED AREAS MUST MEET OWNERS REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC LOADING. 11. PROPOSED PIPE MATERIALS: WATERMAIN DIP CLASS 52 NO LESS THAN 7.5' DEEP. WATER SERVICE COPPER TYPE K, 1" SERVICE TO PROPERTY LINE. SANITARY SEWER PVC SDR 35 NO MORE THAN 20' DEEP. SANITARY SEWER PVC SDR26 20' - 25' DEEP. SANITARY SEWER PVC 4" SERVICE TO PROPERTY LINE. STORM SEWER RCP CLASS 5 12" TO 18" DIAMETER. DRAINTILE POLYETHYLENE BACK OF CURB. STORM SEWER SCHEDULE STRUCTURE NO.CASTING MANHOLE SIZE STMH 1 48" PRECAST STMH 2 48" PRECAST STMH 3 48" PRECAST STMH 4 48" PRECAST STMH 5 48/" PRECAST STMH 6 48" PRECAST STMH 7 72" PRECAST TRENCH DRAIN 12 TRENCH DRAIN 11 R-1733 CITY PLATE NO. SS-1& SS-3 R-1733 R-1733 R-1733 R-1733 R-1733 R-1733 SS-1& SS-3 SS-1& SS-3 SS-1& SS-3 SS-1& SS-3 SS-1& SS-3 SS-1& SS-3 R-4990-HX TYPE C R-4990-HX TYPE C SCALE IN FEET 0 30 60 NOTE ALL EXISTING SEWER AND WATER SERVICES WILL NEED TO BE DISCONNECTED AT CITY MAIN PER CITY STANDARDS. COORDINATE WITH CITY FOR EXACT LOCATIONS. 03/08/2016 Special Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 2) Title: Excelsior & Monterey Redevelopment (Bridgewater/Dominium)Page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esubmittal03.08.2016 Special Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 2) Title: Excelsior & Monterey Redevelopment (Bridgewater/Dominium)Page 30 .(<127(6 *5$3+,&/(*(1' &21&5(7(7<3 ),1,6+ -2,17,1* 3$77(517%' 785)*5$6662' ,55,*$7(' 3$9(53('(67$/6&2/25 6,=(7%' +$5':22'08/&+ 6+5(''(' 6<17+(7,&785)251$7,9( 35$,5,(0,; '(&25$7,9(&21&5(7( &2/25),1,6+ -2,17,1* 3$77(517%' 52&.08/&+3($ *5$9(/ 52&.08/&+7%' / / / / / / / / / / // /// / // / / / / / / / / / / / / // / / // / / / / / 3523(57</,1( 3523(57</,1( / / // / / / / / (;&(/6 ,25 %/9 '0217(5(<'53$5.&200216'5 / / / / / / / // // // / / / / / / / / / / /LFHQVH1XPEHU/LFHQVH1XPEHU ,KHUHE\FHUWLI\WKDWWKLVSODQVSHFLILFDWLRQRU UHSRUWZDVSUHSDUHGE\PHRUXQGHUP\GLUHFW VXSHUYLVLRQDQGWKDW,DPDGXO\/LFHQVHG 3URIHVVLRQDO/DQGVFDSH$UFKLWHFWXQGHUWKHODZV RIWKH6WDWHRI0LQQHVRWD /LFHQVH1XPEHU %.9*URXS,QF(2( 6+((7180%(5 6+((77,7/( '$7( '5$:1%< &+(&.('%< &200,66,21180%(5 .(<3/$1 352-(&77,7/( &2168/7$176 .9*5283 $UFKLWHFWXUH ,QWHULRU'HVLJQ /DQGVFDSH$UFKLWHFWXUH (QJLQHHULQJ %RDUPDQ.URRV9RJHO*URXS ,QF ZZZENYJURXSFRP (2( %12 7)25&216 758&7,21&(57,),&$7,21 /LFHQVH1XPEHU 'DWH 3/$1758(1257+&?5HYLW/RFDO?B([FHOVLRU0RQWHUH\B/$1'BBMEDJJHQVWRVVUYW$0-&% -&% / 6,7(3/$1 (;&(/6,25 0217(5(< / 6,7(3/$1 / 251$0(17$/75((66((6+((7/ / (;,67,1*75((6725(0$,13527(&7$65(48,5('6((&,9,/ / 1$7,9(3(5(11,$/$1''(&,'82863/$17,1*66((6+((7/ / &85%&876 / '(&25$7,9(&21&5(7(3$9(0(17&2/257%' / 35,0$5<(175$1&( / 785)*5$66,55,*$7('7<3 / 81'(5*5281'3$5.,1*$&&(66 / &21&5(7(:$/.:$<67<3-2,17,1*9$5,(63(53/$1 / 3$5.,1**$5$*($&&(66 / (;,67,1*&21&5(7(:$/.6725(0$,1 / 67((/('*,1*7<3 / 5(7$,1,1*:$//66((&,9,/ / 75((*5$7(6 / %,.(5$&.6 / &21&5(7(67$,56:0(7$/5$,/,1*7<3 / 5$,6('&21&5(7(3/$17(5:$//6720$7&+&,7<67$1'$5'67<3 / (;,67,1*&85% *877(5725(0$,16((&,9,/ / 52&.08/&+7%' / $'$&85%5$0366((&,9,/ / 3$5.,1**$5$*($&&(66'5,9( / 352326('&85% *877(56((&,9,/ / '2*581 / 0(7$/)(1&,1*7%' / (;,67,1*%/'*6 / (;,67,1*75((*5$7(6725(0$,16((&,9,/ / (/(&75,&$/(48,36(((/(& / 6,7(/,*+7,1*6(((/(& / 6(59,&((175<6(($5&+ / /2%%<(175$1&(6(($5&+ / 0(7$/&$%/(*8$5'5$,/6+%/$&. ,668( '$7( '(6&5,37,21 38'6XEPLWWDO 38'5HVXEPLWWDO 38'5HVXEPLWWDO01.25.2016 01.25.2016 03.08.2016 Special Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 2) Title: Excelsior & Monterey Redevelopment (Bridgewater/Dominium)Page 31 7\SH&DWDORJ 352326('3/$176&+('8/( *5$3+,&/(*(1' &21&5(7(7<3 ),1,6+ -2,17,1* 3$77(517%' 785)*5$6662' ,55,*$7(' 3$9(53('(67$/6&2/25 6,=(7%' +$5':22'08/&+ 6+5(''(' 6<17+(7,&785)251$7,9( 35$,5,(0,; '(&25$7,9(&21&5(7( &2/25),1,6+ -2,17,1* 3$77(517%' 52&.08/&+3($ *5$9(/ 52&.08/&+7%' (;&(/6 ,25 %/9 '0217(5(<'53$5.&200216'5 3523(57</,1( *7 *7 (D 37 7$ 9E (D 37 (D 37 (D 9E 7$ (D 37 9E 7$ 9E 8& *' 6S 7$ 7$ 7$ 7$ $* 03 %V &D 03 %V $U 03 &D %V $U &D 03 %V $U &D 03 %V 37 37 37 37 *D (D 5J 37 *7 5J $U /V $U *D *D 6V $U $U *D *D 6V $U /V /V $U *D *D 6G 0V %V 0V 1I /N 'V +K 'V 9W 'V 9W $R 9W $R +K 9W +K +K +K 0V %V +K 0V %V 5J 5J 6K 0V +K 5J 9W 0V %V +K 5J +E 0V 'V 37 7$ 37 +E 9E 9E 6V $* +E 0V +E 9E 0V 0V 6V +K 6V +K 6V +K 3U 3523(57</,1( *7 /V /V /V /V $U 5J 5J 5J &D 5J 1I $U %V 1I /N /N 1I 5J 1I (;,67,1*+21(</2&86775((6725(0$,1 6((3/$1'(7$,// *7 6V 5J 37 6V 7$ /LFHQVH1XPEHU/LFHQVH1XPEHU ,KHUHE\FHUWLI\WKDWWKLVSODQVSHFLILFDWLRQRU UHSRUWZDVSUHSDUHGE\PHRUXQGHUP\GLUHFW VXSHUYLVLRQDQGWKDW,DPDGXO\/LFHQVHG 3URIHVVLRQDO/DQGVFDSH$UFKLWHFWXQGHUWKHODZV RIWKH6WDWHRI0LQQHVRWD /LFHQVH1XPEHU %.9*URXS,QF(2( 6+((7180%(5 6+((77,7/( '$7( '5$:1%< &+(&.('%< &200,66,21180%(5 .(<3/$1 352-(&77,7/( &2168/7$176 .9*5283 $UFKLWHFWXUH ,QWHULRU'HVLJQ /DQGVFDSH$UFKLWHFWXUH (QJLQHHULQJ %RDUPDQ.URRV9RJHO*URXS ,QF ZZZENYJURXSFRP (2( %12 7)25&216 758&7,21&(57,),&$7,21 /LFHQVH1XPEHU 'DWH 3/$1758(1257+&?5HYLW/RFDO?B([FHOVLRU0RQWHUH\B/$1'BBMEDJJHQVWRVVUYW$0-&% -&% / /$1'6&$3( 3/$1 (;&(/6,25 0217(5(< 47< 6<0 &200211$0( 6&,(17,),&1$0( 3/$17,1* 6,=(&200(176 75((6 $) $5067521*0$3/( $FHU[IUHHPDQLL $UPVWURQJ &217 $* $87801%5,//,$1&( 6(59,&(%(55< $PHODQFKLHU[JUDQGLIORUD $XWXPQ%ULOOLDQFH &$/% % %1 )2;9$//(<&/803 %,5&+ %HWXODQLJUD /LWWOH.LQJ &217 *' .(178&.<(635(662 &2))((75(( *\PQRFODGXVGLRLFXV (VSUHVVR &$/% % *7 1257+(51$&&/$,0 +21(</2&867 *OHGLWVLDWULDFDQWKRVYDU LQHUPLV +DUYH &$/% % 03 3,1.63,5(6&5$% 0DOXV 3LQN6SLUHV &$/% % 3$0%(5-8%,/(( 1,1(%$5.75(( 3K\VRFDUSXVRSXOLIROLXV -HIUDP 33 &217 37 6:(',6+&2/801$5 $63(1 3RSXOXVWUHPXOD (UHFWD &$/% % 65 ,925<6,/./,/$& 6\ULQJDUHWLFXODWD ,YRU\ 6LON &$/% % 7$ %28/(9$5'/,1'(1 7LOLDDPHULFDQD %RXOHYDUG &$/% % 8& 1(:+25,=21(/0 8OPXVFDUSLQLIROLD 1HZ +RUL]RQ &$/% % 6+58%6 $R 67$1',1*29$7,21 6(59,&(%(55< $PHODQFKLHUDOQLIROLD 2EHOLVN &217 &D 7207+80% &2721($67(5 &RWRQHDVWHUDSLFXODWXV 7RP7KXPE &217 'V %877(5)/<%86+ +21(<68&./( 'LHUYLOODVHVVLOLIROLD %XWWHUIO\ &217 (D ':$5):,1*(' (821<086 (XRQ\PXVDODWXV &RPSDFWXV &217 -F *2/'&21(-81,3(5 -XQLSHUXVFRPPXQLV *ROG&RQH &217 6G '21$/':<0$1/,/$& 6\ULQJD[SUHVWRQLDH 'RQDOG:\PDQ &217 6S 0,66.,0/,/$& 6\ULQJDSDWXOD 0LVV.LP &217 6V 6(0$6+63,5($ 6RUEDULDVRUELIROLD 6HP 33 &217 9E &203$&7$0(5,&$1 9,%85180 9LEXUQXPWULOREXP %DLOH\ &RPSDFW &217 9W :(17:257+ 9,%85180 9LEXUQXPWULOREXP :HQWZRUWK &217 3(5(11,$/6*5$66(69,1(6 $U 5('2&72%(5%,* %/8(67(0 $QGURSRJRQ 5HG 2FWREHU 33$) &217 %V 62/$5)/$5( 35$,5,(%/8(6%$37,6,$ %DSWLVLD 6RODU)ODUH 3UDLULHEOXHV33$) &217 *D $5,=21$5('6+$'(6 %/$1.(7)/2:(5 *DLOODUGLDDULVWDWD $UL]RQD 5HG6KDGHV &217 +E %/8($1*(/+267$ +RVWD %OXH$QJHO &217 +K +$'63(1%/8(+267$ +RVWD +DGVSHQ%OXH &217 +S 3$5'210('$</,/< +HPHURFDOLV 3DUGRQ0H &217 /N .2%2/'/,$75,6 /LDWULVVSLFDWD .REROG &217 /V )/25,67$1:+,7( /,$75,6 /LDWULVVSLFDWD )ORULVWDQ :KLWH &217 0V 0,6&$17+86)/$0( *5$66 0LVFDQWKXVVLQHQVLV 3XUSXUDVFHQV &217 1I .,7.$7&$70,17 1HSHWDIDDVVHQLL .LW.DW &217 3U -$&2% 6/$''(5 3ROHPRQLXPUHSWDQV 327 5J *2/'67580 58'%(&.,$ 5XGEHFNLD *ROGVWXUP &217 6K 35$,5,('5236((' 6SRUREROXVKHWHUROHSLV &217 / /$1'6&$3(3/$1 ,668( '$7( '(6&5,37,21 38'6XEPLWWDO 38'5HVXEPLWWDO 38'5HVXEPLWWDO 5HVSRQVHWR&RPPHQWV02.25.2016 PUD Resubmittal03.08.2016 Special Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 2) Title: Excelsior & Monterey Redevelopment (Bridgewater/Dominium)Page 32 .(<127(6 352326('3/$176&+('8/( *5$3+,&/(*(1' &21&5(7(7<3 ),1,6+ -2,17,1* 3$77(517%' 785)*5$6662' ,55,*$7(' 3$9(53('(67$/6&2/25 6,=(7%' +$5':22'08/&+ 6+5(''(' 6<17+(7,&785)251$7,9( 35$,5,(0,; '(&25$7,9(&21&5(7( &2/25),1,6+ -2,17,1* 3$77(517%' 52&.08/&+3($ *5$9(/ 52&.08/&+7%' /5 /5 /5 /5 /5 /5 /5 /5 /5 /5 /5 /5 /5 /5 /5 /5 /5 /5 /5 /5 /5 /5 /5 /5 /5/5 /5 /5 /5 3 %1 $U %1 $U 65 65 -F -F -F 6K 0V 6K +E $) 0V +S $) $) /5/5 0V +E +E -F -F -F +E -F -F 0V -F -F -F -F 37 6K +S 37 6K +S 37 6K 37 6K -F $U +E -F 6K 37 65 +S 6K -F +S +E +S 6K -F /5 -F -F -F /LFHQVH1XPEHU/LFHQVH1XPEHU ,KHUHE\FHUWLI\WKDWWKLVSODQVSHFLILFDWLRQRU UHSRUWZDVSUHSDUHGE\PHRUXQGHUP\GLUHFW VXSHUYLVLRQDQGWKDW,DPDGXO\/LFHQVHG 3URIHVVLRQDO/DQGVFDSH$UFKLWHFWXQGHUWKHODZV RIWKH6WDWHRI0LQQHVRWD /LFHQVH1XPEHU %.9*URXS,QF(2( 6+((7180%(5 6+((77,7/( '$7( '5$:1%< &+(&.('%< &200,66,21180%(5 .(<3/$1 352-(&77,7/( &2168/7$176 .9*5283 $UFKLWHFWXUH ,QWHULRU'HVLJQ /DQGVFDSH$UFKLWHFWXUH (QJLQHHULQJ %RDUPDQ.URRV9RJHO*URXS ,QF ZZZENYJURXSFRP (2( %127)2 5&216758&7,2 1&(57,),&$7,21 /LFHQVH1XPEHU 'DWH &?5HYLW/RFDO?B([FHOVLRU0RQWHUH\B/$1'BBMEDJJHQVWRVVUYW$0-&% -&% / /(9(/$0(1,7< 522)'(&.3/$1 (;&(/6,25 0217(5(<47< 6<0 &200211$0( 6&,(17,),&1$0( 3/$17,1* 6,=(&200(176 75((6 $) $5067521*0$3/( $FHU[IUHHPDQLL $UPVWURQJ &217 $* $87801%5,//,$1&( 6(59,&(%(55< $PHODQFKLHU[JUDQGLIORUD $XWXPQ%ULOOLDQFH &$/% % %1 )2;9$//(<&/803 %,5&+ %HWXODQLJUD /LWWOH.LQJ &217 *' .(178&.<(635(662 &2))((75(( *\PQRFODGXVGLRLFXV (VSUHVVR &$/% % *7 1257+(51$&&/$,0 +21(</2&867 *OHGLWVLDWULDFDQWKRVYDU LQHUPLV +DUYH &$/% % 03 3,1.63,5(6&5$% 0DOXV 3LQN6SLUHV &$/% % 3$0%(5-8%,/(( 1,1(%$5.75(( 3K\VRFDUSXVRSXOLIROLXV -HIUDP 33 &217 37 6:(',6+&2/801$5 $63(1 3RSXOXVWUHPXOD (UHFWD &$/% % 65 ,925<6,/./,/$& 6\ULQJDUHWLFXODWD ,YRU\ 6LON &$/% % 7$ %28/(9$5'/,1'(1 7LOLDDPHULFDQD %RXOHYDUG &$/% % 8& 1(:+25,=21(/0 8OPXVFDUSLQLIROLD 1HZ +RUL]RQ &$/% % 6+58%6 $R 67$1',1*29$7,21 6(59,&(%(55< $PHODQFKLHUDOQLIROLD 2EHOLVN &217 &D 7207+80% &2721($67(5 &RWRQHDVWHUDSLFXODWXV 7RP7KXPE &217 'V %877(5)/<%86+ +21(<68&./( 'LHUYLOODVHVVLOLIROLD %XWWHUIO\ &217 (D ':$5):,1*(' (821<086 (XRQ\PXVDODWXV &RPSDFWXV &217 -F *2/'&21(-81,3(5 -XQLSHUXVFRPPXQLV *ROG&RQH &217 6G '21$/':<0$1/,/$& 6\ULQJD[SUHVWRQLDH 'RQDOG:\PDQ &217 6S 0,66.,0/,/$&6\ULQJDSDWXOD 0LVV.LP &217 6V 6(0$6+63,5($ 6RUEDULDVRUELIROLD 6HP 33 &217 9E &203$&7$0(5,&$1 9,%85180 9LEXUQXPWULOREXP %DLOH\ &RPSDFW &217 9W :(17:257+ 9,%85180 9LEXUQXPWULOREXP :HQWZRUWK &217 3(5(11,$/6*5$66(69,1(6 $U 5('2&72%(5%,* %/8(67(0 $QGURSRJRQ 5HG 2FWREHU 33$) &217 %V 62/$5)/$5( 35$,5,(%/8(6%$37,6,$ %DSWLVLD 6RODU)ODUH 3UDLULHEOXHV33$) &217 *D $5,=21$5('6+$'(6 %/$1.(7)/2:(5 *DLOODUGLDDULVWDWD $UL]RQD 5HG6KDGHV &217 +E %/8($1*(/+267$ +RVWD %OXH$QJHO &217 +K +$'63(1%/8(+267$ +RVWD +DGVSHQ%OXH &217 +S 3$5'210('$</,/< +HPHURFDOLV 3DUGRQ0H &217 /N .2%2/'/,$75,6 /LDWULVVSLFDWD .REROG &217 /S 3236,&/(%/8(/83,1( /XSLQXV 3RSVLFOH%OXH &217 /V )/25,67$1:+,7( /,$75,6 /LDWULVVSLFDWD )ORULVWDQ :KLWH &217 0V 0,6&$17+86)/$0( *5$66 0LVFDQWKXVVLQHQVLV 3XUSXUDVFHQV &217 1I .,7.$7&$70,17 1HSHWDIDDVVHQLL .LW.DW &217 3U -$&2% 6/$''(5 3ROHPRQLXPUHSWDQV 327 5J *2/'67580 58'%(&.,$ 5XGEHFNLD *ROGVWXUP &217 6K 35$,5,('5236((' 6SRUREROXVKHWHUROHSLV &217 / /(9(/$0(1,7<522)'(&.3/$1 /5 6:,00,1*322/ /5 7$%/(6 &+$,567%' /5 &+$,6(/281*(67%' /5 287'225,1'225),5()($785(6((,17(5,256 /5 6<17+(7,&785) /5 6+$'(6758&785(0(7$/)5$0,1*:'(&25$7,9(:22'6+$'( ,16(576 /5 /,1($53/$17(56:,17(*5$7(',55,*$7,21$1'/,*+7,1* /5 75((3/$17(56 /5 /281*()851,785(7%' /5 81,73$7,26 /5 %$55$,/:,7+6($7,1* /5 *5,//67$7,21:,7+1$785$/*$6*5,//66,1.%8,/7,1)5,'*($1' &22/(56<67(0:+,*+$1'/2:6($7,1* /5 &$%$1$6:/281*(6($7,1*$1'',1,1*7$%/(6 /5 5(&<&/( /,77(55(&(37$&/(6 /5 +*$7($&&(66 /5 3('(67$/3$9(56%,621,3( 9(56$'-867 :,7+,3(7,/(6$1' :$86$8 ; (;35(66,216 &21&5(7(3$9(563$77(516 /$<287 7%' /5 287'22579 /5 3$5$3(7:$//:0(7$/5$,/,1*6(($5&+ ,668( '$7( '(6&5,37,21 38'6XEPLWWDO 38'5HVXEPLWWDO 38'5HVXEPLWWDO 01.25.2016 01.25.2016 03.08.2016 Special Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 2) Title: Excelsior & Monterey Redevelopment (Bridgewater/Dominium)Page 33 6725< 6725< 6725< 322/'(&. 6725<6725<(;&(/6,25%/9'0217(5(<'5,9(3$5.&20'5 (;,67,1* $3$570(17 %8,/',1* %5,'*(:$7(5 6) &$5:$6+ [ /2$',1* $5($ 75$16)250(56 '2*581 =(526(7%$&. 5(48,5(0(17 '2:172:1 03/6 9,(:72 '2:172:1 03/6 :25.32,17 (;,67,1* %8,/',1* (;,67,1* %8,/',1* &',675,&7 5',675,&7 5',675,&7 3523(57</,1( 3523(57</,1( 3523(57</,1( %$/&21<$7/(9(/ 72/(9(/7<3 &$123<$%29( (175$1&(72 5(6,'(17,$/3$5.,1* /(9(/3$1'/(9(/3 (175$1&(725(7$,/ 3$5.,1*$1' 5(6,'(17,$/*8(67 (175$1&(725(7$,/ 3$5.,1*$1' 5(6,'(17,$/*8(67 %$/&21<$7/(9(/ 72/(9(/7<30$,17$,1%/$&.723 75$6+'80367(53$5.,1*63$&(6380(5758&.6,1*/(81,7 758&. 5$',86 :% *$5%$*(758&. 3$5$0(',&81,7 5$',86 :% 5 '5$,1$*( $1'87,/,7< ($6(0(17 '5$,1$*($1' 87,/,7<($6(0(17 3523(57</,1(2) $'-$&(173523(57< '5$,1$*($1' 87,/,7<($6(0(17 '5$,1$*($1' 87,/,7<($6(0(17 $5($:(// 672509$8/7 %(/2:*5$'( 672509$8/7 %(/2:*5$'( 5(6,'(17,$/ 5(6,'(17,$/ 5(6,'(17,$/5(6,'(17,$/ 5(6,'(17,$/ 5(7$,1,1*:$//%$6( 2):$//6(721 3523(57</,1( 5(7$,1,1* :$//6((&,9,/ '5$,1$*($1' 87,/,7<($6(0(17 6725<726725< 3523(57</,1( 726725< '5$,1$*( $1'87,/,7< ($6(0(17 6725< '(&. (/(9$725 29(5581 (/(9$725 29(5581 $7&251(5 726725< 726725< 6(7%$&.726725< 726725< 72/(9(/5(7$,/ 72%$/&21< 726725< 726725< 76725< 726725< 726725< 726725< 726725< 726725< 726725< &$123<&251(5 72&$123<&251(5 72 '5$,1$*($1' 87,/,7<($6(0(17 21675((73$5.,1*67$//6 21675((73$5.,1*67$//6 %$/&21<&251(5 72726725< 76725< $&&(66($6(0(17 726725< 5(7$,1,1* :$//6((&,9,/ 726725< 72 5(7$,1 ,1*:$// 5(7$,1,1*:$// 7 5(7$,1,1*:$// 726,*1$*(123$5.,1* ),5(/$1( =21,1*'$7$ /276,=(6) =21,1*',675,&70; 6(7%$&.9$5,(66((3/$1 2))675((73$5.,1*5(48,5(0(176 5(6,'(17,$/63$&(6,1&/8'(6*8(6763$&(6 %('678',2;%(';%('; &200(5&,$/63$&(6$7%$1.6)6)63$&( 63$&(6$727+(55(7$,/6)6)63$&( 63$&(6$7(;,67,1*5(7$,/6)6)63$&( 727$/&200(5&,$/63$&(6; 63$&(6 727$/5(48,5('63$&(65(48,5(' 727$/3529,'('63$&(6/(9(/33 21675((73$5.,1* (;,67,1*3$5$//(/67$//621(;&(/6,25%/9'725(0$,1 %,&<&/(3$5.,1*5(48,5(0(176 08/7,)$0,/<5(48,5('63$&(681,76$87263$&(6 08/7,)$0,/<3529,'('63$&(6/(9(/33 &200(5&,$/5(48,5('63$&(6 &200(5&,$/3529,&('63$&(6 3$5.,1*0$<%(5('8&('%<3(5&(17)25$1<3$5&(//2&$7(':,7+,121( 48$57(52)$0,/()520$75$16,76723 /LFHQVH1XPEHU/LFHQVH1XPEHU/LFHQVH1XPEHU %.9*URXS,QF(2( 6+((7180%(5 6+((77,7/( '$7( '5$:1%< &+(&.('%< &200,66,21180%(5 .(<3/$1 352-(&77,7/( &2168/7$176 .9*5283 $UFKLWHFWXUH ,QWHULRU'HVLJQ /DQGVFDSH$UFKLWHFWXUH (QJLQHHULQJ %RDUPDQ.URRV9RJHO*URXS ,QF 1RUWK 0LQQHDSROLV 7HOHSKRQH )DFVLPLOLH ZZZENYJURXSFRP (2( % 6HFRQG6WUHHW 01 12 7)25&216 758&7,21&(57,),&$7,21 /LFHQVH1XPEHU 'DWH 3/$1758(1257+ $5($$ $5($%&?5HYLW/RFDO?B([FHOVLRU0RQWHUH\B$,6BBMKHPHUUYW30$XWKRU &KHFNHU $ $5&+6,7(3/$1 (;&(/6,25 0217(5(< $ 6,7(3/$1 3DUNLQJ6FKHGXOH /HYHO 7\SH &RXQW /HYHO3 /HYHO3 [ &RPSDFW /HYHO3 [ $'$ /HYHO3 [ $'$Z6WULSHV /HYHO3 [ 6WDQGDUG /HYHO3 /HYHO3 [ &RPSDFW /HYHO3 [ $'$ /HYHO3 [ $'$Z6WULSHV /HYHO3 [ 6WDQGDUG /HYHO /HYHO [ &RPSDFW /HYHO [ $'$ /HYHO [ $'$Z6WULSHV /HYHO [ 6WDQGDUG *UDQGWRWDO 3DUNLQJ&RXQW3HU/HYHO /HYHO &RXQW /HYHO3 /HYHO3 /HYHO *UDQGWRWDO 6,7(0$3 352-(&76,7(03/6,668( '$7( '(6&5,37,21 38'68%0,77$/ 38'5(68%0,77$/ 38'5(68%0,77$/2016/03/08 Special Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 2) Title: Excelsior & Monterey Redevelopment (Bridgewater/Dominium)Page 34 83 83 $ - $ % & ' ( ) * + - ) = . ; < 5$0383 :$7(5 +($7(5 ),5(3803 5220 6(59,&( (/(9(48,3 (/(9/2%%< (/(9/2%%< (/(9(48,3 6) 75$6+ 5(&<&/,1* 5(6 6725$*( 33$5.,1* 0(&+ (;+$867 [ 29(5+($' '225 67$,5$(/(9 67$,5% 0(&+$+8 $%29( (/(9 6725$*( . ) )/22502817('%,.( 5$&.6)25%,.(6 )/22502817(' %,.(5$&.6)25 %,.(6 )/22502817('%,.( 5$&.6)25%,.(6 )/22502817(' %,.(5$&.6)25 %,.(6 )/22502817(' %,.(5$&.6)25 %,.(6 )/22502817('%,.( 5$&.6)25%,.(6 )/22502817(' %,.(5$&.6)25 %,.(6 /LFHQVH1XPEHU/LFHQVH1XPEHU/LFHQVH1XPEHU %.9*URXS,QF(2( 6+((7180%(5 6+((77,7/( '$7( '5$:1%< &+(&.('%< &200,66,21180%(5 .(<3/$1 352-(&77,7/( &2168/7$176 .9*5283 $UFKLWHFWXUH ,QWHULRU'HVLJQ /DQGVFDSH$UFKLWHFWXUH (QJLQHHULQJ %RDUPDQ.URRV9RJHO*URXS ,QF 1RUWK 0LQQHDSROLV 7HOHSKRQH )DFVLPLOLH ZZZENYJURXSFRP (2( % 6HFRQG6WUHHW 01 12 7)25&216 758&7,21&(57,),&$7,21 /LFHQVH1XPEHU 'DWH 3/$1758(1257+ $5($$ $5($%&?5HYLW/RFDO?B([FHOVLRU0RQWHUH\B$,6BBH]LDLHUYW30$XWKRU &KHFNHU $ /(9(/3 5()(5(1&( 3/$1 (;&(/6,25 0217(5(< $ /(9(/35()(5(1&(3/$1 3DUNLQJ6FKHGXOH /HYHO 7\SH &RXQW /HYHO3 /HYHO3 [ &RPSDFW /HYHO3 [ $'$ /HYHO3 [ $'$Z6WULSHV /HYHO3 [ 6WDQGDUG /HYHO3 /HYHO3 [ &RPSDFW /HYHO3 [ $'$ /HYHO3 [ $'$Z6WULSHV /HYHO3 [ 6WDQGDUG /HYHO /HYHO [ &RPSDFW /HYHO [ $'$ /HYHO [ $'$Z6WULSHV /HYHO [ 6WDQGDUG *UDQGWRWDO 3DUNLQJ&RXQW3HU/HYHO /HYHO &RXQW /HYHO3 /HYHO3 /HYHO *UDQGWRWDO ,668( '$7( '(6&5,37,21 38'6XEPLWWDO 38'5HVXEPLWWDO 38'6XEPLWWDO %,.(63$&(6 3%,.(6725$*( 3)/225028175$.&6 3)/225028175$.&6 727$/ 2016/03/08 PUD SUBMITTAL Special Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 2) Title: Excelsior & Monterey Redevelopment (Bridgewater/Dominium)Page 35 '1 '1 83 $ - $ % & ' ( ) * + - ) = . ; < 5$03'1 0(&+ $+8 %,.( 6725$*( & (/(9/2%%< & 6(59,&( & 6725$*( & (/(9/2%%< & 75$6+&+87( 6+$)772%(/2: 67$,5$(/(9 (/(9 67$,5% '2*581 $&&(66 33$5.,1* & 6) 33$5.,1* & '2*:$6+ & . ) *(1(5$725 50 & (/(&5220 & 0') % 0(&+ (;+$867 0(&+(;+$867 %,.(5$&.6 )/22502817('%,.( 5$&.6)25%,.(6 )/22502817('%,.( 5$&.6)25%,.(6 )/22502817('%,.( 5$&.6)25%,.(6 )/22502817(' %,.(5$&.6)25 %,.(6 )/22502817(' %,.(5$&.6)25 %,.(6 /LFHQVH1XPEHU/LFHQVH1XPEHU/LFHQVH1XPEHU %.9*URXS,QF(2( 6+((7180%(5 6+((77,7/( '$7( '5$:1%< &+(&.('%< &200,66,21180%(5 .(<3/$1 352-(&77,7/( &2168/7$176 .9*5283 $UFKLWHFWXUH ,QWHULRU'HVLJQ /DQGVFDSH$UFKLWHFWXUH (QJLQHHULQJ %RDUPDQ.URRV9RJHO*URXS ,QF 1RUWK 0LQQHDSROLV 7HOHSKRQH )DFVLPLOLH ZZZENYJURXSFRP (2( % 6HFRQG6WUHHW 01 12 7)25&216 758&7,21&(57,),&$7,21 /LFHQVH1XPEHU 'DWH 3/$1758(1257+ $5($$ $5($%&?5HYLW/RFDO?B([FHOVLRU0RQWHUH\B$,6BBH]LDLHUYW30$XWKRU &KHFNHU $ /(9(/3 5()(5(1&( 3/$1 (;&(/6,25 0217(5(< $ /(9(/35()(5(1&(3/$1 3DUNLQJ6FKHGXOH /HYHO 7\SH &RXQW /HYHO3 /HYHO3 [ &RPSDFW /HYHO3 [ $'$ /HYHO3 [ $'$Z6WULSHV /HYHO3 [ 6WDQGDUG /HYHO3 /HYHO3 [ &RPSDFW /HYHO3 [ $'$ /HYHO3 [ $'$Z6WULSHV /HYHO3 [ 6WDQGDUG /HYHO /HYHO [ &RPSDFW /HYHO [ $'$ /HYHO [ $'$Z6WULSHV /HYHO [ 6WDQGDUG *UDQGWRWDO 3DUNLQJ&RXQW3HU/HYHO /HYHO &RXQW /HYHO3 /HYHO3 /HYHO *UDQGWRWDO ,668( '$7( '(6&5,37,21 38'6XEPLWWDO 38'5HVXEPLWWDO 38'6XEPLWWDO %,.(63$&(6 3%,.(6725$*( 3)/225028175$.&6 3)/225028175$.&6 727$/ 2016/03/08 PUD SUBMITTAL Special Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 2) Title: Excelsior & Monterey Redevelopment (Bridgewater/Dominium)Page 36 83 '1 83 $ - $ % & ' ( ) * + - ) = . ; < 3$&.$*( & 0$,/5220 & /2%%< & /2%%< & %5,'*(:$7(5 %$1. 5(7$,/ 9(67,%8/( & 67$,5& 67$,5$(/(9 67$,5% (/(9 6) &200(5&,$/ 75$6+ & 287/,1(2) 322/$%29( &200(5&,$/ '(/,9(5< $5($:$<: 0(7$/*5$7( /,1(2) %8,/',1* $%29( /,1(2)%8,/',1* $%29( /,1(2) %8,/',1* $%29( /,1(2) %8,/',1*$%29( /,1(2) 6725< %8,/',1* $%29( /,1(2)%8,/',1* $%29( %5,'*(:$7(5 &$5:$6+ )8785(5(6,'(173$5.,1* )8785(5(6,'(173$5.,1* 75$6+&+87( 6+$)772%(/2: &200(5&,$/ 3$5.,1* 5(7$,/ 5(7$,/ 322/(48,3 & . ) 67$//6)25%5,'*(:$7(567$//6)25%5,'*(:$7(572&2/801 72&2/801 %,.(5$&.6)255(7$,/6 %,.(6 %,.(5$&.6)25 5(7$,/%,.(6 %,.(5$&.6)25 5(6,'(17,$/%,.(6 9(57,&$/&/($5$1&(0,1 &/($5$1&(0,1'5,9(/$1( 9(57,&$/&/($5$1&(0,1 9(57,&$/&/($5$1&( %8,/',1*6800$5< )ORRU %OGJ*URVV 5RRI'HFN 5HQWDEOH6)%DQN 5HWDLO 1RQ5HQW8VDEOH *URVV3DUNLQJ 7+/(9(/ 7+/(9(/ 7+/(9(/ 5'/(9(/ 1'/(9(/ 67/(9(/ 3$5.,1*3 3$5.,1*3 7RWDO &/($5+(,*+7 &/($5+(,*+7 127(,1&200(5&,$/3$5.,1*$5($621/(9(/ 9(57,&$/&/($5$1&(,6 3529,'('3(501$&&(66,%,/,7<&2'(81/(66127('27+(5:,6( /LFHQVH1XPEHU/LFHQVH1XPEHU/LFHQVH1XPEHU %.9*URXS,QF(2( 6+((7180%(5 6+((77,7/( '$7( '5$:1%< &+(&.('%< &200,66,21180%(5 .(<3/$1 352-(&77,7/( &2168/7$176 .9*5283 $UFKLWHFWXUH ,QWHULRU'HVLJQ /DQGVFDSH$UFKLWHFWXUH (QJLQHHULQJ %RDUPDQ.URRV9RJHO*URXS ,QF 1RUWK 0LQQHDSROLV 7HOHSKRQH )DFVLPLOLH ZZZENYJURXSFRP (2( % 6HFRQG6WUHHW 01 12 7)25&216 758&7,21&(57,),&$7,21 /LFHQVH1XPEHU 'DWH 3/$1758(1257+ $5($$ $5($%&?5HYLW/RFDO?B([FHOVLRU0RQWHUH\B$,6BBMKHPHUUYW30$XWKRU &KHFNHU $ /(9(/ 5()(5(1&( 3/$1 (;&(/6,25 0217(5(< $ /(9(/5()(5(1&(3/$1 3DUNLQJ6FKHGXOH /HYHO 7\SH &RXQW /HYHO3 /HYHO3 [ &RPSDFW /HYHO3 [ $'$ /HYHO3 [ $'$Z6WULSHV /HYHO3 [ 6WDQGDUG /HYHO3 /HYHO3 [ &RPSDFW /HYHO3 [ $'$ /HYHO3 [ $'$Z6WULSHV /HYHO3 [ 6WDQGDUG /HYHO /HYHO [ &RPSDFW /HYHO [ $'$ /HYHO [ $'$Z6WULSHV /HYHO [ 6WDQGDUG *UDQGWRWDO 3DUNLQJ&RXQW3HU/HYHO /HYHO &RXQW /HYHO3 /HYHO3 /HYHO *UDQGWRWDO ,668( '$7( '(6&5,37,21 38'68%0,77$/ 38'5(68%0,77$/ 38'5(68%0,77$/ 38'5(68%0,77$/2016/03/08 Special Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 2) Title: Excelsior & Monterey Redevelopment (Bridgewater/Dominium)Page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pecial Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 2) Title: Excelsior & Monterey Redevelopment (Bridgewater/Dominium)Page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pecial Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 2) Title: Excelsior & Monterey Redevelopment (Bridgewater/Dominium)Page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pecial Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 2) Title: Excelsior & Monterey Redevelopment (Bridgewater/Dominium)Page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pecial Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 2) Title: Excelsior & Monterey Redevelopment (Bridgewater/Dominium)Page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pecial Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 2) Title: Excelsior & Monterey Redevelopment (Bridgewater/Dominium)Page 42 2016/03/08 PUD SUBMITTAL Special Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 2) Title: Excelsior & Monterey Redevelopment (Bridgewater/Dominium)Page 43 2016/03/08 PUD SUBMITTAL Special Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 2) Title: Excelsior & Monterey Redevelopment (Bridgewater/Dominium)Page 44 /HYHO /HYHO /HYHO /HYHO /HYHO /HYHO5RRI 030(7$/3$1(/&)%&(0(17),%(5%2$5' /$3),(/'3$,17 &(0(17678&&2 $/80%$/&21,(67<3&)%&(0(17),%(5%2$5' /$3),(/'3$,17 (;7(5,25),1,6+0$7(5,$/6 727$/($67&2857<$5')$&$'(6) &/$660$7(5,$/6 */$66 678&&2 727$/&/$66 /HYHO /HYHO /HYHO /HYHO /HYHO /HYHO5RRI 03&20326,7(0(7$/ 3$1(/9(57,&$/6 030(7$/3$1(/&)%&(0(17),%(5%2$5' /$3),(/'3$,17 &(0(17678&&2 $/80%$/&21,(67<3 &)%35(),1,6+('3$1(/&/,3 6<67(01,&+,+$ &)%&(0(17),%(5%2$5' /$3),(/'3$,17 (;7(5,25),1,6+0$7(5,$/6 727$/:(67&2857<$5')$&$'(6) &/$660$7(5,$/6 */$66 678&&2 727$/&/$66 030(7$/3$1(/ 030(7$/3$1(/&)%&(0(17),%(5%2$5' /$3),(/'3$,17 $/80%$/&21,(67<3 (;7(5,25),1,6+0$7(5,$/6 727$/1257+&2857<$5')$&$'(6) &/$660$7(5,$/6 */$66 727$/&/$66 &)%&(0(17),%(5%2$5' /$3),(/'3$,17 /LFHQVH1XPEHU/LFHQVH1XPEHU/LFHQVH1XPEHU %.9*URXS,QF(2( 6+((7180%(5 6+((77,7/( '$7( '5$:1%< &+(&.('%< &200,66,21180%(5 .(<3/$1 352-(&77,7/( &2168/7$176 .9*5283 $UFKLWHFWXUH ,QWHULRU'HVLJQ /DQGVFDSH$UFKLWHFWXUH (QJLQHHULQJ %RDUPDQ.URRV9RJHO*URXS ,QF 1RUWK 0LQQHDSROLV 7HOHSKRQH )DFVLPLOLH ZZZENYJURXSFRP (2( % 6HFRQG6WUHHW 01 12 7)25&216 758&7,21&(57,),&$7,21 /LFHQVH1XPEHU 'DWH $5($$ $5($%&?5HYLW/RFDO?B([FHOVLRU0RQWHUH\B$,6BBH]LDLHUYW30$XWKRU &KHFNHU $ (;7(5,25 (/(9$7,216 (;&(/6,25 0217(5(< $ ($67&2857<$5'(/(9 $ :(67&2857<$5'(/(9 $ 1257+&2857<$5'(/(9 ([FHOVLRU 0RQWHUH\±([WHULRU0DWHULDOV 03)OXVK0HWDO3DQHO´+RUL]RQWDO &RORU6LOYHU0HWDOOLF 03)OXVK0HWDO3DQHO$VQHFHVVDU\IRUWULP´%DVH &RORU6LOYHU0HWDOOLF 03&RPSRVLWH0HWDO3DQHO &RORU6LOYHU0HWDOOLF 03)OXVK0HWDO3DQHO )LUHVWRQH8&)OXVK3DQHO6\VWHP´9HUWLFDO &RORU6LOYHU0HWDOOLF &)%&HPHQW%RDUG´+RUL]RQWDO6KLS/DS &RORU)LHOG3DLQW:KLWH &)%&HPHQW%RDUG´+RUL]RQWDO6KLS/DS &RORU)LHOG3DLQW2UDQJH &)%&HPHQW%RDUG´+RUL]RQWDO6KLS/DS &RORU)LHOG3DLQW2UDQJH &)%&HPHQW%RDUG3UHILQLVKHG3DQHO6\VWHPZ&OLSV &RORU:RRG)LQLVK &HPHQW6WXFFR&RDW6\VWHP &RORU:KLWH)LQLVK %ULFN2UDQJH1RUPDQ6L]H 5HG0DWW6DQGHG6HULHV([WRQ %ULFN:KLWH±8WLOLW\6L]H *OHQ*HU\-HIIHUVRQ:KLWH* 5RFNIDFH&08´[´ &RORU$QWLTXH:KLWH :LQGRZV)LEHUJODVV &RORU%ODFN)LQLVK ,668( '$7( '(6&5,37,21 38'6XEPLWWDO 38'5HVXEPLWWDO 38'6XEPLWWDO 2016/03/08 PUD SUBMITTAL Special Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 2) Title: Excelsior & Monterey Redevelopment (Bridgewater/Dominium)Page 45 Calculation Summary Label CalcType Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min EXTERIOR PARKING AREA Illuminance Fc 1.44 2.5 0.1 14.40 25.00 LEVEL 1 PARKING_Floor Illuminance Fc 5.60 17.6 0.4 14.00 44.00 SITE Illuminance Fc 4.66 40.9 0.0 N.A. N.A. 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.3 0 1.1 1.1 0.8 0.4 1.8 1.8 1.4 0.9 2.4 1.9 1.3 2.3 2.5 2.2 1.5 2.12.12.01.6 1.92.01.81.2 2.1 2.0 1.6 1.1 2.4 2.1 1.6 1.0 2.3 2.3 1.8 2.0 2.1 1.8 1.1 1.6 1.5 0.5 0.9 1.1 0.5 7.8 2.7 2.0 1.2 1.3 2.1 0.7 1.0 3.3 0.7 0.9 2.3 1.1 1.3 1.6 3.8 4.6 2.4 8.2 10.6 3.2 0.7 1.5 3.8 4.7 2.7 3.6 5.2 2.7 2.5 4.7 4.5 3.6 3.5 2.2 1.3 2.5 8.2 11.4 4.0 6.3 12.4 4.1 3.7 11.6 8.2 3.9 3.4 2.2 2.9 6.0 6.0 6.8 7.1 6.2 6.7 6.3 5.9 6.9 6.1 8.9 10.7 3.4 0.9 1.7 5.1 13.8 5.1 4.9 13.5 6.4 4.0 10.6 9.3 3.6 3.4 4.9 5.4 2.9 2.0 5.1 6.7 6.8 3.8 3.5 5.8 4.1 3.1 5.3 5.0 2.8 2.9 4.2 4.7 2.8 2.8 10.2 9.9 4.0 2.6 2.6 3.1 2.7 2.4 2.9 3.1 2.7 3.3 8.8 11.2 3.7 2.0 3.6 3.8 2.8 2.4 3.3 5.5 3.8 2.6 3.5 5.5 3.8 3.3 4.6 5.0 3.4 2.2 4.9 5.0 3.3 3.3 4.8 13.3 6.0 3.6 5.5 13.9 5.8 4.5 6.3 7.2 6.0 2.9 10.0 9.6 5.1 8.4 5.8 6.8 5.8 8.9 6.4 7.4 6.3 9.9 11.0 10.7 4.5 4.1 5.4 2.4 4.3 4.6 5.1 12.2 5.5 3.1 4.4 11.7 5.3 3.4 5.5 13.1 7.2 5.2 3.4 2.6 3.8 2.9 8.1 8.3 4.6 4.8 3.4 2.4 3.0 4.5 3.5 2.7 3.7 5.7 7.9 12.0 4.9 2.5 3.4 4.2 8.6 8.5 4.1 3.6 3.1 2.3 2.4 3.3 3.3 2.8 3.5 4.5 5.9 7.5 3.9 2.4 2.8 16.7 7.6 7.2 3.8 6.6 7.0 2.7 2.7 6.8 6.8 3.8 5.8 9.1 4.7 3.3 2.8 3.1 4.5 2.6 9.2 8.4 3.5 8.7 9.7 3.0 3.1 9.8 9.8 6.3 8.7 13.4 6.4 4.8 3.7 7.3 10.0 1.7 3.3 3.5 2.5 3.7 4.5 3.5 3.9 5.7 7.1 14.1 11.2 7.5 11.0 10.9 4.2 7.4 9.4 0.9 1.0 8.2 8.1 10.1 10.2 15.0 12.5 11.1 10.6 7.9 3.5 2.9 3.0 0.4 13.6 11.9 17.0 14.2 17.6 15.1 16.3 11.2 6.1 3.1 2.0 1.7 1.4 2.3 3.1 3.8 4.1 4.2 3.8 2.8 2.1 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.7 2.2 2.9 3.8 3.7 2.7 2.0 1.5 1.1 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.3 1.8 2.4 2.6 2.5 1.9 1.7 3.2 5.1 7.1 7.3 8.3 7.2 4.5 2.9 2.5 2.8 3.3 3.2 3.2 3.9 3.7 2.9 3.3 5.0 7.7 7.3 4.5 2.9 2.5 2.8 3.2 2.1 1.5 1.2 1.1 1.5 2.6 4.5 5.6 5.1 3.0 2.3 4.3 8.3 13.0 11.9 13.3 11.5 6.0 3.5 3.1 5.7 8.4 6.6 4.9 10.1 9.9 4.2 3.7 6.3 10.8 10.6 5.4 3.3 3.4 6.8 9.9 3.9 1.9 1.6 1.3 1.7 3.2 7.5 9.8 8.8 4.1 2.5 5.1 10.1 13.9 5.1 10.1 8.2 4.6 3.1 2.8 5.1 8.6 5.8 5.4 9.89.24.33.85.36.96.74.5 3.3 3.9 8.2 11.3 4.1 2.7 2.0 1.4 1.62.85.80.06.8 2.2 4.2 7.7 9.4 7.8 5.8 4.3 2.3 2.2 2.7 20.1 3.7 20.0 21.2 15.9 13.1 18.7 19.9 20.4 20.4 16.3 12.0 19.6 20.4 18.6 7.4 18.7 15.1 6.5 1.4 2.5 4.1 3.5 3.3 3.2 5.4 8.8 6.9 4.0 3.2 2.7 1.5 1.4 2.1 4.7 9.9 6.8 3.7 6.5 2.7 0.7 0.7 1.83.87.25.63.00.9 7.4 2.5 0.3 0.3 1.5 3.1 4.9 4.8 3.0 1.3 3.0 1.5 0.2 0.2 1.23.28.710.83.918.5 1.2 1.2 0.1 0.1 0.93.18.011.23.618.7 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.82.24.04.63.016.3 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.7 2.0 4.1 5.8 3.2 12.6 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.0 2.2 6.7 16.3 4.2 11.6 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.0 1.8 4.8 9.5 4.0 15.9 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.0 1.6 3.6 5.1 3.8 19.8 0.4 0.2 0.1 1.4 4.1 11.8 5.7 19.7 0.5 0.2 0.1 1.1 4.7 14.7 6.4 19.0 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.8 2.2 4.0 4.4 7.0 3.5 4.0 2.8 2.8 0.5 1.2 2.2 3.7 15.5 4.37.33.22.10.6 0.40.72.05.27.7 3.9 2.3 0.8 0.2 0.4 1.5 4.6 7.4 6.4 3.7 1.0 0.2 0.2 1.2 4.5 7.3 3.3 3.0 0.9 0.2 0.1 0.8 2.6 3.1 10.5 14.2 1.3 0.8 0.7 0.4 4.3 3.3 1.0 0.3 0.1 0.5 1.7 4.4 6.2 9.7 0.3 7.0 3.6 1.2 0.4 0.0 0.3 0.9 5.1 7.8 10.3 11.3 11.6 12.1 12.0 9.3 0.2 3.3 1.8 1.0 0.5 0.0 0.1 0.6 2.7 7.1 6.1 6.9 5.2 5.1 5.1 4.0 0.2 1.7 1.8 1.0 0.0 0.1 0.5 2.8 7.5 11.3 19.4 17.4 17.4 17.9 13.0 0.1 0.9 1.3 0.0 0.1 0.4 2.1 4.1 3.16.83.91.30.90.60.1 1.0 0.0 0.2 1.4 1.5 1.3 5.2 2.7 4.5 6.1 5.5 7.6 6.0 6.3 5.3 3.0 2.2 1.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.7 0.7 0.6 1.2 0.10.10.20.20.40.10.51.2 - --------;6/;6/ ;6/;6/ ;6/ ;6/ ;6/ ;6/ ;6/;6/ ;6/ ;% ;% ;% ;% ;%;% ;% ;: ;: ;: ;: ;:;:;: ;' ;' ;' ;' ;' ;' ;' ;' ;' ;' ;';' ;' ;';';' ;';';';';';';';';';';' ;: ;' ;' ;)0535,0$5<)(('(5 50& ;)056(&21'$5<)(('(5 39&/987,/,7<6(59,&( - --------;6/ ;6/;6/ ;6/ ;6/;6/;6/ ;6/ ;6/ ;6/ ;6/ ;% ;% ;% ;% ;%;% ;% ;' ;' ;' ;' ;' ;' ;' ;' ;' ;' ;' ;' ;' ;' ;' ;';' ;' ;' ;: ;: ;:;:;: ;: ;' ;' ;' ;' ;' ;' ;' ;' ;' ;: ;: ;: ;: ;: ;: ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** **** ;' ;' ;' ;' ;' ;' ;' ;' ;' ;' ;' ;' ;' ;' ;' ;6/ ;6/ /LFHQVH1XPEHU 'DWH %.9*URXS,QF(2( '$7( '5$:1%< &+(&.('%< &200,66,21180%(5 .9*5283 $UFKLWHFWXUH ,QWHULRU'HVLJQ /DQGVFDSH$UFKLWHFWXUH (QJLQHHULQJ %RDUPDQ.URRV9RJHO*URXS ,QF 1RUWK 0LQQHDSROLV 7HOHSKRQH )DFVLPLOLH ZZZENYJURXSFRP (2( % 6HFRQG6WUHHW 01 6+((7180%(5 6+((77,7/( .(<3/$1 &2168/7$176 &(57,),&$7,21 352-(&77,7/( $5($$ $5($%&?5HYLW/RFDO?B([FHOVLRU0RQWHUH\B0(BBMRUWPDQQUYW$0-72 &6. ( (/(&75,&$/ 3+2720(75,& 6,7(3/$1 (;&(/6,25 0217(5(< ( (/(&75,&$/6,7(3/$1 (/(&75,&$//80,1$,5(),;785(6&+('8/((;7(5,25 ,' ),;785(7<3( 02817,1* 92/76 ),;785(/$03 48$17,7<),;785(:$77$*( ),;785(/$03 7<3( &21752/0(',$ /(16/289(56(7& ),;785('(6&5,37,21 7<3(0$18)$&785(56(5,$/180%(5 127(6 ;$ 3/$17(56327/,*+7 685)$&(:$// 9 : /('. )/22'5()/(&725 ',(&$67$/80,180),1,6+ 7%' 5$%+%/('$6(5,(6 ;% %2//$5'$5($/,*+7 *5$'(07' 9 : /(' ',))86('$&5</,7(/(16 %2//$5'$5($/,*+7 /$1'6&$3()2506*8,'(%2//$5' ;' (;7(5,255(&(66(' '2:1/,*+7 5(&(66(' 9 : /('. 23(1$3(5785( *27+$0(926(5,(6 ;' 3(5*2/$02817(''2:1 /,*+7 685)$&( 9 : /('. ),1,6+7%' %./,*+7,1*'(1$/,6(5,(6 ;3 (;7(5,253(1'$17 9 : ;6 67(3/,*+7 685)$&(:$// 9 : /('. 1$ (;7(5,2567(3/,*+7$1' '2:1 %(*$/('6(5,(6 ;6/ &,7<2)67/28,63$5.32/( /,*+7 32/( 9 : +36 6,1*/(+($'32/(02817(' /,*+7 6+(5,'$16+6(5,(6 ;6/ &,7<2)67/28,63$5.3(' 6&$/(/,*+7 32/( 9 : +36 '8$/+($'3('(675,$1 6&$/(/,*+7 6+(5,'$16+6(5,(6 ;6/ 6,1*/(+($'32/(/,*+7 32/( 9 : +36 6,1*/(+($'32/(02817(' /,*+7 /,7+21,$'6;/('& ;:83'2:1/,*+7 :$//9 :/('.(;7(5,25'2:1/,*+7),1,6+ 7%' /80,1,66<5,266<6(5,(6 ;::$//07'$5($/,*+7 :$//9 :/('7<3(,,',675,%87,21 (;7(5,25/(':$//07' $5($/,*+7 /,7+21,$:65/(' ;::$//07'$5($/,*+7 :$//9 :/('7<3(,,,',675,%8,7,21 (;7(5,25/(':$//07' $5($/,*+7 /,7+21,$:65/(' ,668( '$7( '(6&5,37,21 38'5HVXEPLWWDO 38'5HVXEPLWWDO 38'6XEPLWWDO 38'5HVXEPLWWDO 03/08/2016 Special Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 2) Title: Excelsior & Monterey Redevelopment (Bridgewater/Dominium)Page 46 LOUCKS W:\2014\14634\CADD DATA\SURVEY\S14634-MasterPlotted: 02 /09 / 2016 11:9 AM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. CADD QUALIFICATION Excelsior & Monterey St. Louis Park, MN Dominium Development and Acquisitions, LLC 2905 Northwest Boulevard Suite 150, Plymouth, MN 55441 License No. Date I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. VICINITY MAP Field Crew Henry D. Nelson - PLS 17255 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.14-634 RLL/HDN TMB BS 02-09-16 10-20-15 DRAWING ISSUED 10-21-15 ADD PROPOSED ZONING 02-09-16 REVISE R/W & LOT LINES Preliminary Plat of Bridgewater Addition 1 of 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 16, Block 2, Minikahda Vista 2nd Addition. (Abstract Property) Lots 15 and 17, Block 2, Minikahda Vista 2nd Addition. (Torrens Property) Together with: Lot 18, Block 2, Minikahda Vista 2nd Addition, Hennepin County, except that part thereof lying Southwesterly of a line 35 feet Northeasterly of and parallel with a line described as beginning at a point 30 feet Southwesterly from the most Southerly corner of Lot 17, Block 2, "Minikahda Vista 2nd Addition, Hennepin County", as measured at right angles from the Southwesterly line of said Lot 17; thence Northwesterly parallel with said Southwesterly line 142.63 feet and there terminating. Together with: Lots 19 and 20, Block 2, Minikahda Vista 2nd Addition, Hennepin County, except that part of said lots lying Southwesterly of a line 35 feet Northeasterly of and parallel with a line described as beginning at a point 30 feet Southwesterly from the most Southerly corner of Lot 17, Block 2, "Minikahda Vista 2nd Addition, Hennepin County", as measured at right angles from the Southwesterly line of said Lot 17; thence Northwesterly parallel with said Southwesterly line 142.63 feet; thence along a tangential curve to the left having a tangent length of 120 feet, delta angle of 3 degrees 18 minutes and 55 seconds for a distance of 239.95 feet and there terminating. (Torrens Property) Together with: All that part Lots 19 and 20, Block 2, lying within a distance of 35 feet on both sides of a line described as beginning at a point 30 feet Southwesterly from the most Southerly corner of Lot 17, Block 2, "Minikahda Vista 2nd Addition, Hennepin County", as measured at right angles from the Southwesterly line of said Lot 17; thence Northwesterly parallel with said Southwesterly line 142.63 feet; thence along a tangential curve to the left having a tangent length of 120 feet, delta angle of 3 degrees 18 minutes and 55 seconds for a distance of 239.95 feet and there terminating, in Minikahda Vista 2nd Addition, Hennepin County. Together with: All that part of Lot 18, lying Southwesterly of a line 35 feet Northeasterly of and parallel with a line described as beginning at a point 30 feet Southwesterly from the most Southerly corner of Lot 17, Block 2, "Minikahda Vista 2nd Addition, Hennepin County", as measured at right angles from the Southwesterly line of said Lot 17; thence Northwesterly parallel with said Southwesterly line, 142.63 feet and there terminating, in Block 2, "Minikahda Vista 2nd Addition, Hennepin County". (Torrens Property) Together with: Lots 11, 12, 13 and 14, Block 2, "Minikahda Vista 2nd Addition, Hennepin County". Together with: That part of Lot 34 lying South of a line drawn Westerly at right angles to the East line of Lot 35 at a point 350 feet South of the Northeast corner of said Lot 35, Block 2, "Minikahda Vista 2nd Addition, Hennepin County". Together with: Lot 35, except that part of the Easterly 15 feet of said Lot embraced between the extension West of the Northerly boundary line of Lot 8, Block 2, "Minikahda Vista 2nd Addition, Hennepin County" and the extension West of the Southerly boundary line of Lot 9, Block 2, "Minikahda Vista 2nd Addition, Hennepin County", and except that part of said Lot 35 lying North of a line drawn Westerly at right angles to the East line of said Lot 35 at a point 350 feet South of the Northeast corner of said Lot 35 and except that part of Lot 35 described as beginning at the Northwesterly corner of Lot 10; thence Southwesterly along the Northwesterly line of said Lot 10 to the most Northerly corner of Lot 11; thence Southwesterly along the Northwesterly line of Lots 11 and 12, 52.5 feet; thence Northwesterly at right angles 16.5 feet; thence Northeasterly at right angles to the point of intersection with the Westerly extension of the North line of said Lot 10; thence East along said extension to the point of beginning, Block 2, "Minikahda Vista 2nd Addition, Hennepin County". Together with: That part of Lot 35 described as follows, to-wit: beginning at the Northwesterly corner of Lot 10, thence Southwesterly along the Northwesterly line of said Lot 10 to the most Northerly corner of Lot 11; thence Southwesterly along the Northwesterly line of Lots 11 and 12, 52.5 feet; thence Northwesterly at right angles 16.5 feet; thence Northeasterly at right angles to the point of intersection with the Westerly extension of the North line of said Lot 10, thence East along said extension to the point of beginning, Block 2, "Minikahda Vista 2nd Addition, Hennepin County". (Torrens Property) Lot 10, Block 2, Minikahda Vista 2nd Addition (Abstract Property) BENCHMARK: Top nut of hydrant located at the southwest quadrant of Excelsior & Monterey as shown. Elev. = 900.03 feet (City of St Louis Park Datum - NGVD 1929, per survey prepared by Sunde Land Surveying, dated January 21, 2015) EXISTING ZONING: Zone (R-4) Multiple-Family Residence Zone (C-2) General Commercial PROPOSED ZONING: Zone (MX) Mixed Use AREAS: Lot 1 95,128 Sq.Ft. or 2.18 Acres Lot 2 9,092 Sq.Ft. or 0.21 Acres Net Property Area = 104,220 Sq.Ft. or 2.39 Acres Right of way Dedication Area = 21,877 Sq.Ft. or 0.50 Acres Total Property Area = 126,097 Sq.Ft. or 2.89 Acres SCALE IN FEET 0 30 NOTE: The underlying topographic information was obtained from a survey prepared by Sunde Land Surveying, dated January, 21, 2015, by permission of the client. The boundary information was prepared by Loucks. Also, the approximate locations of the buildings, shown in the northeast corner of the site, was added by Loucks. Preliminary Plat of: BRIDGEWATER ADDITION Special Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 2) Title: Excelsior & Monterey Redevelopment (Bridgewater/Dominium)Page 47 SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS LOUCKS KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Bridgewater Bank, a Minnesota banking corporation, fee owner of the following described property situated in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, to wit: Lot 16, Block 2, “Minikahda Vista 2nd Addition, Hennepin County”. (Abstract Property) Lots 15 and 17, Block 2, “Minikahda Vista 2nd Addition, Hennepin County”. (Torrens Property) AND that St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority, a Minnesota public body corporate and politic, fee owner of the following described property situated in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, to wit: Lot 18, Block 2, “Minikahda Vista 2nd Addition, Hennepin County”, except that part thereof lying Southwesterly of a line 35 feet Northeasterly of and parallel with a line described as beginning at a point 30 feet Southwesterly from the most Southerly corner of Lot 17, Block 2, "Minikahda Vista 2nd Addition, Hennepin County", as measured at right angles from the Southwesterly line of said Lot 17; thence Northwesterly parallel with said Southwesterly line 142.63 feet and there terminating. Together with: Lots 19 and 20, Block 2, “Minikahda Vista 2nd Addition, Hennepin County”, except that part of said lots lying Southwesterly of a line 35 feet Northeasterly of and parallel with a line described as beginning at a point 30 feet Southwesterly from the most Southerly corner of Lot 17, Block 2, "Minikahda Vista 2nd Addition, Hennepin County", as measured at right angles from the Southwesterly line of said Lot 17; thence Northwesterly parallel with said Southwesterly line 142.63 feet; thence along a tangential curve to the left having a tangent length of 120 feet, delta angle of 3 degrees 18 minutes and 55 seconds for a distance of 239.95 feet and there terminating. (Torrens Property) AND that City of St. Louis Park, a Minnesota municipal corporation, fee owner of the following described property situated in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, to wit: All that part Lots 19 and 20, Block 2, lying within a distance of 35 feet on both sides of a line described as beginning at a point 30 feet Southwesterly from the most Southerly corner of Lot 17, Block 2, "Minikahda Vista 2nd Addition, Hennepin County", as measured at right angles from the Southwesterly line of said Lot 17; thence Northwesterly parallel with said Southwesterly line 142.63 feet; thence along a tangential curve to the left having a tangent length of 120 feet, delta angle of 3 degrees 18 minutes and 55 seconds for a distance of 239.95 feet and there terminating, in “Minikahda Vista 2nd Addition, Hennepin County”. Together with: All that part of Lot 18, lying Southwesterly of a line 35 feet Northeasterly of and parallel with a line described as beginning at a point 30 feet Southwesterly from the most Southerly corner of Lot 17, Block 2, "Minikahda Vista 2nd Addition, Hennepin County", as measured at right angles from the Southwesterly line of said Lot 17; thence Northwesterly parallel with said Southwesterly line, 142.63 feet and there terminating, in Block 2, "Minikahda Vista 2nd Addition, Hennepin County". (Torrens Property) AND that Bridgewater Bancshares, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, fee owner of the following described property situated in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, to wit: Lots 11, 12, 13 and 14, Block 2, "Minikahda Vista 2nd Addition, Hennepin County". Together with: That part of Lot 34 lying South of a line drawn Westerly at right angles to the East line of Lot 35 at a point 350 feet South of the Northeast corner of said Lot 35, Block 2, "Minikahda Vista 2nd Addition, Hennepin County". Together with: Lot 35, except that part of the Easterly 15 feet of said Lot embraced between the extension West of the Northerly boundary line of Lot 8, Block 2, "Minikahda Vista 2nd Addition, Hennepin County" and the extension West of the Southerly boundary line of Lot 9, Block 2, "Minikahda Vista 2nd Addition, Hennepin County", and except that part of said Lot 35 lying North of a line drawn Westerly at right angles to the East line of said Lot 35 at a point 350 feet South of the Northeast corner of said Lot 35 and except that part of Lot 35 described as beginning at the Northwesterly corner of Lot 10; thence Southwesterly along the Northwesterly line of said Lot 10 to the most Northerly corner of Lot 11; thence Southwesterly along the Northwesterly line of Lots 11 and 12, 52.5 feet; thence Northwesterly at right angles 16.5 feet; thence Northeasterly at right angles to the point of intersection with the Westerly extension of the North line of said Lot 10; thence East along said extension to the point of beginning, Block 2, "Minikahda Vista 2nd Addition, Hennepin County". Together with: That part of Lot 35 described as follows, to-wit: beginning at the Northwesterly corner of Lot 10, thence Southwesterly along the Northwesterly line of said Lot 10 to the most Northerly corner of Lot 11; thence Southwesterly along the Northwesterly line of Lots 11 and 12, 52.5 feet; thence Northwesterly at right angles 16.5 feet; thence Northeasterly at right angles to the point of intersection with the Westerly extension of the North line of said Lot 10, thence East along said extension to the point of beginning, Block 2, "Minikahda Vista 2nd Addition, Hennepin County". (Torrens Property) Lot 10, Block 2, “Minikahda Vista 2nd Addition, Hennepin County” (Abstract Property) Have caused the same to be surveyed and platted as BRIDGEWATER DOMINIUM ADDITION and do hereby dedicate to the public for public use forever the public ways and the easements for drainage and utility purposes as shown on this plat. In witness whereof said Bridgewater Bank, a Minnesota banking corporation, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this ______ day of ____________________, 201_____. BRIDGEWATER BANK _________________________________________ (Name) _________________________________________ (Title) State of _______________ County of ______________ This instrument was acknowledged before me this ______ day of ____________________, 201_____ by ____________________________, _________________________ of Bridgewater Bank, a Minnesota banking corporation, on behalf of the corporation. _________________________________________ (Signature) _________________________________________ (Printed Name) Notary Public ____________________ County, ______________ My Commission Expires January 31, 20_____ In witness whereof said St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority, a Minnesota public body corporate and politic, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this ______ day of ____________________, 201_____. ST. LOUIS PARK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY _________________________________________ (Name) _________________________________________ (Title) State of ______________ County of ______________ This instrument was acknowledged before me this ______ day of ____________________, 201_____ by ____________________________, _________________________ of St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority, a Minnesota public body corporate and politic, on behalf of the corporation. _________________________________________ (Signature) _________________________________________ (Printed Name) Notary Public ____________________ County, _______________ My Commission Expires January 31, 20_____ SURVEYORS CERTIFICATION I, Henry D. Nelson, do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. Dated this ______ day of __________________, 201____ __________________________________ Henry D. Nelson, Licensed Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 17255 State of Minnesota County of Hennepin This instrument was acknowledged before me this ______ day of __________________, 201_____ by Henry D. Nelson, a Licensed Land Surveyor. _________________________________________ (Signature) _________________________________________ (Printed Name) Notary Public Hennepin County, Minnesota My Commission Expires January 31, 2020 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA This plat of BRIDGEWATER DOMINIUM ADDITION was approved and accepted by the City Council of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, at a regular meeting thereof held this ______ day of _________________, 201_____. If applicable, the written comments and recommendations of the Commissioner of Transportation and the County Highway Engineer have been received by the City or the prescribed 30 day period has elapsed without receipt of such comments and recommendations, as provided by Minn. Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. CITY COUNCIL OF ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA By __________________________________, Mayor By ______________________________, Clerk RESIDENT AND REAL ESTATE SERVICES, Hennepin County, Minnesota I hereby certify that taxes payable in 201_____ and prior years have been paid for land described on this plat, dated this ________ day of ____________________, 201_____. Mark V. Chapin, Hennepin County Auditor By ________________________________, Deputy SURVEY DIVISION, Hennepin County, Minnesota Pursuant to MN. STAT. Sec. 383B.565 (1969) this plat has been approved this ________ day of ______________________, 201_____. Chris F. Mavis, Hennepin County Surveyor By _________________________________ REGISTRAR OF TITLES, Hennepin County, Minnesota I hereby certify that the within plat of BRIDGEWATER DOMINIUM ADDITION was filed in this office this ________ day of _____________________, 201_____, at ________o'clock __M. Martin McCormick, Registrar of Titles By ________________________________ Deputy COUNTY RECORDER , Hennepin County, Minnesota I hereby certify that the within plat of BRIDGEWATER DOMINIUM ADDITION was recorded in this office this ________ day of _____________________, 201_____, at ________o'clock __M. Martin McCormick, County Recorder By ________________________________ Deputy In witness whereof said City of St. Louis Park, a Minnesota municipal corporation, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this ______ day of ____________________, 201_____. CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK _________________________________________ (Name) _________________________________________ (Title) State of ______________ County of ______________ This instrument was acknowledged before me this ______ day of ____________________, 201_____ by ____________________________, _________________________ of City of St. Louis Park, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation. _________________________________________ (Signature) _________________________________________ (Printed Name) Notary Public ____________________ County, _______________ My Commission Expires January 31, 20_____ In witness whereof said Bridgewater Bancshares, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this ______ day of ____________________, 201_____. BRIDGEWATER BANCSHARES, INC. _________________________________________ (Name) _________________________________________ (Title) State of ______________ County of ______________ This instrument was acknowledged before me this ______ day of ____________________, 201_____ by _______________________, _________________ of Bridgewater Bancshares, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of the corporation. _________________________________________ (Signature) _________________________________________ (Printed Name) Notary Public ____________________ County, _______________ My Commission Expires January 31, 20_____ Special Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 2) Title: Excelsior & Monterey Redevelopment (Bridgewater/Dominium)Page 48 SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS LOUCKS SCALE IN FEET 0 30 Special Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 2) Title: Excelsior & Monterey Redevelopment (Bridgewater/Dominium)Page 49 Meeting: Special Study Session Meeting Date: April 18, 2016 Discussion Item: 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Wooddale/Hwy 7 Traffic Study Update RECOMMENDED ACTION: No formal action required by Council at this time. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Which option should the City pursue to improve the Wooddale Avenue corridor under future development scenarios and the construction of Southwest Light Rail Transit (SWLRT)? SUMMARY: The construction of the Southwest Light Rail line and the Wooddale LRT Station in 2017/ 2018 will result in corridor modifications along Wooddale Avenue that include the ramp terminals of Highway 7 and the intersection of Wooddale Avenue and the South Service Road. Staff hired the consulting firm of Short Elliott Hendrickson (SEH) to help explore ways to leverage the programmed improvements of the SWLRT to enhance safety, traffic operations and allow for future growth of the Wooddale corridor. The exploration of opportunities to allow redevelopment of the city owned parcels in the southeast corner of Wooddale Avenue and Highway 7 has evolved over the last year from focusing on the Xenwood Avenue Extension to now looking at the interchange of Wooddale Avenue and Highway 7. The following pages of this report provide additional detail on the process to date, preliminary findings, current status and next steps of the Wooddale Avenue Corridor. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable at this time/to be determined. VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged community. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion Exhibits A - E Prepared by: Jack Sullivan, Senior Engineering Project Manager Reviewed by: Debra Heiser, Engineering Director Kevin Locke, Community Development Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Special Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 3) Page 2 Title: Wooddale/Hwy 7 Traffic Study Update DISCUSSION Corridor Analysis for Wooddale Avenue and Highway 7 – 2017 and Beyond Due to the proposed roadway changes anticipated with the addition of light rail and the implementation of a whistle quiet zone along the freight and light rail through St. Louis Park, the access to the South Frontage Road is anticipated to become right in / right out in 2017 or 2018. This right in/ right out access has the potential to limit the scale of redevelopment of the City owned McGarvey Coffee parcel and EDA parcel in the southeast corner of Highway 7 and Wooddale Avenue. Due to the limitations noted above, the City began looking for opportunities to find additional ways to access the South Frontage Road. These parcels are bordered by Highway 7 on the north, Highway 100 on the East, the freight and LRT to the south and Wooddale Avenue to the west. This leaves little opportunity to increase access to these sites. In 2014 the City began discussions with the SWLRT Project Office regarding ways to improve the Wooddale and 36th Street Corridor with the following goals in mind: 1. Increase safety for all users of the corridor (including sight lines on the bridge) a. pedestrians b. bicyclists c. vehicles d. light rail e. freight rail 2. Improve traffic operations – Level of Service (LOS) D or better 3. Opportunity to address Comprehensive Plan growth and increased density at SWLRT stations. 4. Appropriate modifications to access the transportation network and private property 5. Construction cost considerations. It is with the above goals in mind that the analysis was completed for the following corridor improvements: 1. SWLRT base design proposal (Exhibit A) 2. Xenwood Avenue Extension (Exhibit B) 3. Strategic modifications to the SWLRT base design A. Widening of bridge deck by 6 foot on each side (Exhibit C,D) B. Development of a south bound Wooddale to east bound south frontage road left turn lane (Exhibit C) for better access to the east side South Frontage Road 4. Wooddale Avenue/Highway 7 Interchange modifications A. Offset buttonhook ramp design (Exhibit D) B. Single Point Urban Intersection (Exhibit E) 5. Allocating a portion of the redevelopment opportunities envisioned on the McGarvey/EDA parcel to the City Owned and Hennepin County Regional Rail Authority (HCCRA) property located on the northeast corner of Wooddale Avenue and 36th Street. Staff has been reviewing the above five options both in isolation and as combinations of each other to provide the best possible design to achieve the City’s goals. Special Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 3) Page 3 Title: Wooddale/Hwy 7 Traffic Study Update The following is an overview of the each of the options: 1. SWLRT Base Design Proposal The SWLRT base design (Exhibit A) is funded by the SWLRT project and has no cost to the City. It adds a traffic signal at each ramp of Highway 7 at Wooddale Avenue as well as gate crossing arms for the SWLRT and freight rail. In addition, the South Frontage Road is anticipated to become right in/ right out in 2017 or 2018. This right in/ right out access will have the potential to impact the development opportunities of the City owned McGarvey Coffee and EDA parcels in the southeast corner of Highway 7 and Wooddale Avenue. In addition, this option has the potential of creating undesirable U-turns at various locations along the corridor to gain access to the frontage roads. These U-turns have the potential to be a safety concern and contribute to the traffic operation delays in the corridor. For these reasons staff looked at other design options to minimize or remove the U-turn concern from the corridor. 2. Xenwood Avenue Extension During the early stages of the SWLRT design process the idea to extend Xenwood Avenue from W. 35th Street to the South Service Road between the former McGarvey Coffee site and the Cityscape apartments was presented. The City entered in to a subordinate funding agreement with the SWLRT and Metropolitan Council in early 2015 for the design of three bridges (Freight, LRT and Regional Trail) necessary to facilitate a Xenwood Avenue roadway extension. (Exhibit B). Staff and SPO worked on preliminary design of the Xenwood Underpass developing more detailed cost estimates and best location for the roadway extension. The updated cost for this improvement is approximately $18.5 million and the roadway extension reduces the buildable area on the McGarvey parcel by about a quarter of acre and complicates the ability to redevelop the site significantly. This high cost and reduction in buildable area are serious issues for the viability of this locally requested capital investment. In addition, the Xenwood Avenue Extension does very little to help safety and traffic operations along Wooddale Avenue and at the interchange with Highway 7. On July 6, 2015 staff brought the Xenwood Extension concept design to Council during a special study session to ask Council if staff should continue to proceed with design of the three bridges by the SPO. Council indicated that the high cost of the project and property impacts make this a less than desirable solution. However direction was given that the SWLRT project office should continue with the design of the three bridges that could facilitate the Xenwood Avenue Extension (Exhibit B). Council also indicated that the issues related to the sight lines and traffic operations on the Wooddale Avenue/Highway 7 bridge needed to be addressed. 3. Strategic Modifications to the SWLRT Base Design Staff analyzed ideas that utilizes the SWLRT base design with some modifications to maximize the infrastructure improvements for our community. 3A.Widening of bridge deck by 6 feet each side The current configuration of the Wooddale Avenue Bridge over Highway 7 is a very tight diamond. This geometry creates limited sight lines for drivers that are stopped at the top of the ramps after exiting Highway 7. The concrete and steel railing along the outside of Special Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 3) Page 4 Title: Wooddale/Hwy 7 Traffic Study Update the bridge can impede the sight line, causing drivers to edge out into the sidewalk and shoulder to look for gaps. There is an option to widen the bridge by about 6 feet on each side. This widening is estimated to have a cost of approximately $750,000. The widening can be seen in orange on Exhibit C (both sides) and on Exhibit D (east side only). 3B. Development of a south bound Wooddale to east bound South Frontage Road left turn lane (Exhibit C) There is an opportunity to add a south bound Wooddale to east bound South Frontage Road left turn lane. This would allow southbound drivers to gain access to the South Frontage Road to the east and to minimize the amount of U-turns that might occur from vehicles trying to access the roadway. The cost estimate for this option or how it effects the traffic operations of the corridor is not yet known. Additional study will be taking place in the coming weeks to better understand the impacts of this option. 4. Wooddale Avenue/Highway 7 Interchange Modifications Due to the high cost and impacts related to the Xenwood Avenue Extension, staff has begun investigating infrastructure improvements at Wooddale Avenue and Highway 7 that would utilize a similar (or less costly) financial investment that could create greater community wide transportation benefits along Wooddale Avenue. In late October of 2015 the City convened a Design Workshop that was attended by SWLRT, MnDOT, Hennepin County, City staff, the PLACE development team and our consultant SEH. The goal of this workshop was to brainstorm ideas that would  address the safety issues of the corridor,  improve sight line at the Highway 7 off ramps,  allow additional development potential; and,  manage the traffic delays and changes to access associated with the construction of the SWLRT. From this workshop twelve concepts were created with input from the various disciplines including traffic engineers, planners and geometric engineers. Staff evaluated in greater detail the four configurations that scored the highest with the above stated goals. None of these concepts include a Xenwood Underpass. The additional evaluation was related to geometrics, traffic operations, impacts to access, available redevelopment potential, phasing opportunities and estimated cost for each option. The desired outcome from this evaluation was to find a cost effective solution that balances the multimodal nature of this corridor with a high level of safety and livability. The two best concepts identified based on preliminary traffic analysis were an “offset buttonhook ramp” and a “single point urban intersection”. These alternatives were evaluated and are described below. 4A. Offset buttonhook ramp design (Exhibit D) This option relocated the east bound on ramp to Highway 7 to the west side of Wooddale Avenue. This frees up some potential land adjacent to the EDA parcel and consolidates the ramps and frontage road in to one signal, thereby removing an intersection from the corridor. The intent of the design is to provide increased traffic capacity for the South frontage road of Hwy 7. However, this option does not provide enough traffic capacity to Special Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 3) Page 5 Title: Wooddale/Hwy 7 Traffic Study Update accommodate a project of the scale of the proposed PLACE development; and it is relatively expensive improvement project. The estimated cost is approximately $7 million. 4B. Single Point Urban Intersection (Exhibit E) This option was the most ambitious evaluated. It provides the most improvement in traffic capacity and achieves the best LOS of all the options considered. It achieves LOS of C or better even with full 2040 the complete PLACE development program on the former McGarvey and EDA parcels. However, this option is very expensive and extremely disruptive, requiring replacement of the existing Wooddale interchange and major changes on the north side of Hwy 7. It is estimated to cost approximately $15 million. Exhibit E shows the substantial right of way acquisition and the additional bridges that would need to be built in order to facilitate this design. 5. Limit Future Vehicle Trip Generation from the S.E. Frontage Road of Hwy7 None of the physical improvements identified above achieve the City’s goals for the Wooddale Corridor and increase the traffic capacity of the SE frontage road/Wooddale intersection except option 4B; the Single Point Urban Intersection. The 4B option is extremely costly, disruptive and difficult to implement. A more cost effective approach to meeting the community’s goals could be to manage the land uses along the SE Hwy 7 frontage road to limit the vehicle trips generated to the maximum number of trips that can be accommodated by the “base design” for the frontage road/Wooddale intersection. Specifically the City could limit the development it allows on the former McGarvey site and the EDA parcel to uses that would not generate more than 125 to 150 vehicle trips in the pm peak hour. This is the amount of traffic that SEH’s traffic analysis shows can be accommodated with the “base design”, right-in right-out intersection at the frontage road/Wooddale Ave. This approach would mean that the PLACE development proposed for the EDA and former McGarvey site would need to be modified. TRAFFIC DATA: The traffic analysis for the corridor improvements reviewed the operations at the corridor intersections for 2040 traffic. The volumes used as the 2040 traffic included all redevelopment anticipated in the Comprehensive Plan and the proposed PLACE development. The results of this modeling indicated that the Level of Service (LOS) at the intersections in the corridor during the PM peak hour did not meet the benchmark of LOS D or better at some intersections. Also, as described in the descriptions of the corridor improvements above, there are other corridor concerns generated by intersection modifications. The results of this analysis are shown in Table 1 below: Special Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 3) Page 6 Title: Wooddale/Hwy 7 Traffic Study Update To understand the threshold for meeting the LOS D or better benchmark, SEH completed a sensitivity analysis to determine the maximum number of trips that could be generated by a development at the McGarvey/ EDA parcels and still achieve at least a LOS of D. Both year 2020, the year SWLRT begins operation, and year 2040, using the anticipated Comprehensive Plan redevelopment traffic was modeled. What follows is a table that shows the results of that analysis. The analysis shows that the proposed SWLRT base plan can handle approximately 125 to 150 additional trips in the PM peak hour at the frontage road/ Wooddale intersection both in the short term and at full projected development in 2040. Table 1: 2040 Comprehensive Plan including proposed PLACE development (398 trips) Option Concept 2040 Level of Service by Intersection Preliminary Cost Estimate N. Ramp S. Ramp S. Frontage 36th St. 36th/ Xenwood 1 Current SWLRT Plan D E D E E $500,000 paid for by SWLRT 2 Xenwood Avenue Extension - - - - - $18,500,000 3A Widen Bridge Deck NA NA NA NA NA $750,000 3B South Bound Left Turn Lane at South Frontage Road Under Review Under Review Under Review Under Review Under Review Cost unknown at this time 4A SW Quadrant Buttonhook E F D E F $7,000,000 4B Offset Single Point with Roundabout C - C C A $15,000,000 Table 2: McGarvey/ EDA Parcels Sensitivity Analysis for 2020 & 2040 Option Concept Trip generation for LOS D or better at all intersections Preliminary Cost Estimate 2040 2020 1 Current SWLRT Plan 125 to 150 200 $500,000 paid for by SWLRT 2 Xenwood Avenue Extension NA NA $18,500,000 3A Widen Bridge Deck NA NA $750,000 3B South Bound Left Turn Lane at South Frontage Road NA NA Cost unknown at this time 4A SW Quadrant Buttonhook NA NA $7,000,000 4B Offset Single Point with Roundabout 398 398 $15,000,000 Special Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 3) Page 7 Title: Wooddale/Hwy 7 Traffic Study Update SUMMARY: The analysis over the last year has lead staff to the following conclusions: 1. There is not one solution that accommodates large scale development on the former McGarvey and EDA parcels without spending $15 million. 2. The SWLRT base plan is effective in addressing proposed Comprehensive Plan growth out to 2040. 3. There are cost effective ways to improve sight lines at the Highway 7 ramp terminals. 4. Tweaks to the SWLRT base plan to maximize the operations at the South East Frontage Road should be pursued. 5. The most cost effective approach for the Hwy 7 South East Frontage Road is to limit the number of vehicle trips generated by limiting the amount of new development on the McGarvey and EDA parcels NEXT STEPS: For any of the design options that require modification to Wooddale Avenue or Highway 7 the City would need to seek input and approval from MnDOT, Metropolitan Council (SWLRT), freight rail and other local stakeholder prior to selecting an alternative to move forward with. Staff will continue with the additional study necessary to understand the traffic operations for option 3B Development of a south bound Wooddale to east bound South Frontage Road left turn lane (Exhibit C). When we have additional information we will work with the Metropolitan Council (SWLRT). The original schedule had staff recommending an alternative around the end of March. Although the traffic analysis is not complete it is evident that the only corridor improvement that achieves an LOS of D or better and accommodates the full PLACE development on the EDA and former McGarvey site is not practical and costs $15 million dollars. Therefore we are suggesting that the City pursue alternative 5, limiting the vehicle trips generated from the former McGarvey site and EDA parcel. This will require PLACE to modify its plans and consider accommodating some of their development program elsewhere. We have suggested they use the parcels on the south side of the Wooddale station platform. PLACE is interested in this approach and is actively evaluating the development potential. The intent is to have a modified PLACE development plan on the May 9th Study Session agenda. Additional traffic analysis work to be completed at PLACE’s expense will be prepared once a modified concept plan is prepared. Exhibit A –SWLRT Base Design Proposal Special Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 3) Title: Wooddale/Hwy 7 Traffic Study Update Page 8 Exhibit B –Xenwood Avenue Extension Special Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 3) Title: Wooddale/Hwy 7 Traffic Study Update Page 9 Exhibit C –South Bound Left Turn Lane Special Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 3) Title: Wooddale/Hwy 7 Traffic Study Update Page 10 Exhibit D –Offset Buttonhook Ramp Special Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 3) Title: Wooddale/Hwy 7 Traffic Study Update Page 11 Exhibit E –Single Point Urban Intersection Special Study Session Meeting of April 18, 2016 (Item No. 3) Title: Wooddale/Hwy 7 Traffic Study Update Page 12