Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2016/04/04 - ADMIN - Agenda Packets - City Council - Regular
AGENDA APRIL 4, 2016 6:30 p.m. SPECIAL STUDY SESSION – Community Room Discussion Items 1. 50 min. Update on Bass Lake Preserve Improvements 7:20 p.m. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY -- Council Chambers 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes 4. Approval of Agenda 5. Reports 5a. Approval of EDA Disbursements 6. Old Business 7. New Business 8. Communications 9. Adjournment 7:30 p.m. CITY COUNCIL MEETING – Council Chambers 1. Call to Order 1a. Pledge of Allegiance 1b. Roll Call 2. Presentations 2a. 2nd Annual SLP Earth Day Proclamation 2b. Presentation Accepting Monetary Donation from Rotary Club of St. Louis Park for the Summer Concert Series ($1,300) 2c. Recognition of Donations 2d. Proclamation – National Service Recognition Day 3. Approval of Minutes 3a. Special City Council Meeting Minutes February 29, 2016 3b. Joint City Council/School Board Meeting Minutes March 14, 2016 4. Approval of Agenda and Items on Consent Calendar NOTE: The Consent Calendar lists those items of business which are considered to be routine and/or which need no discussion. Consent items are acted upon by one motion. If discussion is desired by either a Councilmember or a member of the audience, that item may be moved to an appropriate section of the regular agenda for discussion. The items for the Consent Calendar are listed on the last page of the Agenda. Recommended Action: Motion to approve the Agenda as presented and items listed on the Consent Calendar; and to waive reading of all resolutions and ordinances. (Alternatively: Motion to add or remove items from the agenda, or move items from Consent Calendar to regular agenda for discussion.) Meeting of April 4, 2016 City Council Agenda Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. To make arrangements, please call the Administration Department at 952/924-2525 (TDD 952/924-2518) at least 96 hours in advance of meeting. 5. Boards and Commissions -- None 6. Public Hearings -- None 7. Requests, Petitions, and Communications from the Public – None 8. Resolutions, Ordinances, Motions and Discussion Items 8a. Bid Tabulation: 2016 Pavement Management and Connect the Park! Project (4016-1000 & 4016-2000) Recommended Action: Motion to designate Park Construction Company the lowest responsible bidder and authorize execution of a contract with the firm in the amount of $2,743,053.02 for the 2016 Pavement Management and Connect the Park! Project No. 4016-1000. Motion to Adopt Resolution authorizing the installation of “No Parking” restrictions on the north side of 34th Street from Decatur Lane to 415 feet east of Decatur Lane. A simple majority vote (4) is required to approve the two recommended motions. 8b. Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, and Variance – New Horizons Academy, 2460 Hwy 100 Recommended Action: Motion to Adopt Resolution for a Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Amendment and authorize summary publication. (5 affirmative votes needed to approve.) Motion to approve First Reading of Ordinance amending the Zoning Map to rezone the subject property from Office to Neighborhood Commercial, and set a second reading for April 18, 2016. (4 votes affirmative votes needed for approval.) Motion to Adopt Resolution for a variance to allow the outdoor play area to be less than 200 feet from a principal arterial, subject to conditions recommended by Staff. (4 affirmative votes needed for approval.) 8c. Zero Waste Packaging – Acceptable & Exempt Materials Recommended Action: Motion to approve the acceptable recyclable and compostable material lists and exempt products as noted in this staff report. 8d. Resolution Approving Annual City Manager Evaluation Recommended Action: Motion to Adopt Resolution for formal acceptance of the final City Manager annual evaluation. 9. Communications – None Meeting of April 4, 2016 City Council Agenda CONSENT CALENDAR 4a. Approve the Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance creating Section 36-268-PUD 4 of the Zoning Code and amending the Zoning Map from the O-Office to PUD 4 for the property located at 5075 Wayzata Boulevard, and approve the summary ordinance for publication. 4b. Approve Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance creating Section 36-268-PUD 5 of the Zoning Code and amending the Zoning Map from R-3 Two Family Residence to Planned Unit Development (PUD) 5 for property on the 7700 block of Wayzata Boulevard, and approve the Summary Ordinance for publication. 4c. Adopt Resolution ratifying the EDA’s application to Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) for Minnesota Investment Funds (MIF) on behalf of MoneyGram. 4d. Adopt Resolution approving acceptance of a monetary donation from the Minnesota Society of Arboriculture in an amount not to exceed $2,500 for all related expenses for Jim Vaughan, Natural Resources Coordinator, to attend the 2016 International Society of Arboriculture Conference in Fort Worth, Texas. 4e. Adopt Resolution approving acceptance of a monetary donation from the Rotary Club of St. Louis Park in the amount of $1,300 for the Recreation Division’s Summer Concert Series. 4f. Adopt Resolution approving a Master Partnership Contract with MnDOT relating to Laboratory Testing Services. 4g. Approve for filing Planning Commission Minutes of February 17, 2016. 4h. Approve for filing Planning Commission Minutes of March 2, 2016. 4i. Approve for filing Board of Zoning Appeals Minutes of July 23, 2015. 4j. Approve for filing Environment & Sustainability Commission: Sustainable SLP Minutes of February 3, 2016. 4k. Accept for filing City Disbursement Claims for the period of January 23 through March 25, 2016. St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority and regular City Council meetings are carried live on Civic TV cable channel 17 and replays are frequent; check www.parktv.org for the schedule. The meetings are also streamed live on the internet at www.parktv.org, and saved for Video on Demand replays. The agenda is posted on Fridays on the official city bulletin board in the lobby of City Hall and on the text display on Civic TV cable channel 17. The agenda and full packet are available by noon on Friday on the city’s website. Meeting: Special Study Session Meeting Date: April 4, 2016 Discussion Item: 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Update on Bass Lake Preserve Improvements RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff desires to present to the Council the results of its analysis and resulting recommendations on improvements to the Bass Lake Preserve POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish to proceed with the recommended projects for the Bass Lake Preserve Improvement? SUMMARY: At the June 18, 2012, study session, the City Council directed staff to pursue the Bass Lake Preserve Improvements. The recommended improvements from Barr Engineering was to pursue the functional restoration of the basin. The concept of the project was to clean-out the sediment in the basin. Engineering, wetland mitigation, permitting and possible contamination costs needed to be refined; however, it was estimated that these costs could be as much at $6 million. It was recognized that additional study was needed to define the scope of the project and what work the regulatory agencies would allow the City to complete. In 2014, Engineering began working on defining the scope for the specific projects that would be included to complete the functional restoration of the Bass Lake Preserve. Goals for this project were identified as water quality, dredging, and improvement of the overall aesthetics of this important City resource. To accomplish this goal, the project was divided into three different types of projects: Vegetation Management, Dredging and Infrastructure. Over the course of the last 2 years, staff has explored all options to complete the functional restoration improvements. Numerous meetings with regulatory agencies have been held. In addition, staff met monthly with the Friends of Bass Lake and conducted other community meetings. The City has employed the expertise of water resource and natural resources professionals, to define the scope of this improvement. Attached is a report outlining the work that has been completed, including information regarding recommended projects to improve water quality, reduce point source pollution, and improve overall aesthetics. The recommendations do not include dredging the wetland, because this work was determined to be unfeasible due to permitting requirements. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The total cost of the recommended projects in this report is $2,720,625. The Bass Lake Preserve Improvements were included in the City’s Capital Improvement Plan as a multi-year project with a total budget of $6,000,000. Storm water utility funds have been designated for this improvement. VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a leader in environmental stewardship. We will increase environmental consciousness and responsibility in all areas of city business. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Report Exhibits Prepared by: Phillip Elkin Senior Engineering Project Manager Reviewed by: Debra Heiser, Engineering Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager BASS LAKE PRESERVE IMPROVEMENTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Bass Lake Preserve, consisting of a shallow wetland and its surroundings on the eastern edge of the City of St. Louis Park, is an important aesthetic and recreational amenity for the community. Over time, however, conditions at and around Bass Lake Preserve have deteriorated, so the wetland itself, and the wooded areas and trails that encircle it are in need of repair and restoration. The City of St. Louis Park, desiring to revitalize the Bass Lake Preserve, imagined an improvement project that would involve large-scale dredging within the wetland to deepen the wetland, eliminate cattails, and create large open-water areas. The intent was to create more open vistas, thereby enhancing the aesthetic experience of visitors to the Preserve. Some water quality benefits were also expected to accrue. Because of the scale of the project and its impacts on public waters, it was understood that an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) would need to be prepared to assess possible impacts and allow the project to proceed to permitting. The City contracted with Barr Engineering Company to begin work on the EAW. Based on the research conducted as part of the EAW, our consultant has advised us that the goal of an open water area is not feasible. Dredging the lake bottom and clearing of vegetation to create large open water areas have both regulatory and long term maintenance obstacles to which staff have been advised not to pursue. It was determined that the source of the cattail growth was the not the result of sediment deposits and filling, but an ecosystem which includes a floating peat layer of unknown depth, most likely formed by years of vegetation decomposition. Given these findings, attempts to remove a layer of cattails would only achieve temporary success. The peat environment and existing seed base would require annual removal efforts and return if control efforts were discontinued. In addition, regulatory agencies would not permit this type of activity to occur. During this process the staff has determined a number of projects which would achieve the stated goals of the improvements as well as enhance the aesthetic appearance of the Bass Lake Preserve. The recommended projects identified in this report are: Project Cost Estimate Upland Vegetation Management $1,445,625.00 Carpenter Park Sub-Surface Detention Basin $1,025,000.00 Northeast Corner Wetland $ 100,000.00 Park Glen Drive Improvements $ 70,000.00 Outlet improvements $ 80,000.00 Total Improvement Cost $2,720,625.00 All are feasible, sustainable projects and meet the City’s stormwater management goals and would greatly enhance the status of the Bass Lake Preserve as a community amenity. Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Page 2 Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Report Page 2 of 10 BACKGROUND Bass Lake Preserve is a wetland area (approximately 52 acres) dominated by a cattail monoculture, indicative of a degraded wetland ecosystem. Along the shoreline and adjacent uplands, the vegetated areas have been overtaken by invasive species (e.g., buckthorn and leafy spurge). Significant discarded asphalt and concrete debris can be found along the shores of the Preserve. Erosion along the northeast drainage swale has resulted in loss of vegetation and increased sediment flow into the Preserve. The City sees the Bass Lake Preserve as an important amenity and is committed to making improvements to help it reach its highest potential. On June 18, 2012 the City Council directed the Public Works Staff to pursue “functional restoration” at the site. While the action did not specifically define functional restoration, it was presented as “essentially the same as the cleanout that was performed by the City the winter of 1992 – 93”, there were few specifics on the work to be completed or the goals provided as a part of this improvement. This improvement was also presented with the caveat that any project undertaken would be required to “retain a consultant and develop a project development proposal. Engineering, wetland mitigation, permitting, and possible contamination costs could possibly increase this estimated cost up to a total project cost of $6,000,000.” During the City Council meetings and study sessions, the following comments and notes were made identifying the goals and scope of the functional restoration project: Concern that the City is currently doing nothing to manage Bass Lake Preserve and the Council wanted to be more proactive in managing it. Consider how Bass Lake Preserve functions as an asset to the community and to consider what can be done to make sure it remains useful and functional. Functional purpose for lakes, whether man-made or natural, to manage the City’s storm water and the City’s policy has been to pay those costs to make sure they function to control flooding and the like. Reverse the trend of what is happening with Bass Lake Preserve. Discussion surrounding aesthetics and recreational uses of the City’s water bodies. Approach to wetlands, including Minnehaha Creek, not only for storm water purposes, but the larger plan as it relates to the Watershed District and the State Restoration of the functional needs of the water body. Environmental goal of clean water. Erosion control and prevention of sediment for both water quantity and quality. In 2014, the Engineering Staff began the task of defining and developing a functional restoration improvement. The improvement was approached with the following goals; improve the water quality, remove sediment (dredge), and enhance the aesthetics, vegetation, and habitat of the water resource. Based on initial research, the project plan began with the following the assumptions: The Bass Lake Preserve was once a deeper lake basin supporting large areas of open water. The Bass Lake Preserve’s current condition is due to past efforts to fill and/or drain the basin to reclaim developable land Sediment deposits from the storm sewer infrastructure were responsible for the current shallow water level. Dredging work of 1992 had filled in due to sediment input Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Page 3 Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Report Page 3 of 10 With this information Staff divided the improvement effort into three types of improvements: Dredging, Upland Vegetation Management and Infrastructure Improvements. Dredging was defined to involve removing sediment and soil from the lake and creating more open water areas. The upland vegetation management portion of the project focuses on improving aesthetics, the native ecosystem, promoting wildlife habitat by managing invasive species, and restoring native vegetation. The infrastructure improvements involve repairing and replacing pipe systems, which discharge into the Preserve and control the water leaving the Preserve. Additionally, Staff began an outreach effort to solicit public input on what the project should include, feedback on ideas and updating the progress to interested parties. These efforts included: • Monthly meetings with the Friends of Bass Lake to gather input and provide updates. • An open house in the spring of 2014 to inform local residents of the Bass Lake Preserve Improvement effort. • A general assessment of the trails around the lake in the summer of 2014 to determine which portions of the trail system might benefit from being raised to prevent flooding using excess dredged fill material. • Collection of sediment samples from various locations across the wetland in the summer of 2014, with analysis to better characterize the sediments and assess the extent of contamination. • Working with Great River Greening, to develop a master plan for the upland vegetation around the site. Great River Greening began work at the southwest corner of the site in April 2015, and has continued to work along the upland areas on the west and north sides of the wetland complex. The work involves invasive species removal, selective cutting of non-desirable trees, and re- planting with native trees and shrubs. • A study, conducted by WSB, August 2015, of the emergent vegetation and sediments. • Hiring Barr Engineering to review previous studies and begin a preliminary assessment of environmental impacts, regulatory issues, and permitting needs for possible project activities within the wetland area itself. • A public meeting on September 22, 2015 to update the general public and the Friends of Bass Lake on project progress, and collect input and comments. Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Page 4 Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Report Page 4 of 10 UPLAND VEGETATION MANAGEMENT The Upland Vegetation Management element of this project focuses on improving aesthetics and promoting wildlife habitat by removing invasive species and restoring native vegetation. This work includes the removal of selected trees and invasive vegetation around Bass Lake Preserve, followed by the reestablishment and long-term management of native upland trees, shrubs, and grasses. The project emphasis is on improving the aesthetics of the Preserve and wildlife habitat for songbirds, hummingbirds, bees, reptiles, and small furbearing mammals while maintaining the recreational experience for the public. The first phase of this effort took place using a plan developed by Erick Francis, Water Resources Manager and Jim Vaughan, Natural Resources Coordinator. The project research outline included the following tasks: Perform wetland delineation to determine wetland boundaries and type Perform a phase 1 environmental assessment to determine potential for contamination Review of wetland regulations Perform tree survey to determine species, health, and number of trees Perform topographic survey The first section of vegetation restoration took place in April and May of last year, when a volunteer tree planting event took place. The event was hosted by the Minnesota Tree Trust and included live music and educational opportunities. When the project Staff determined an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) was necessary, Great River Greening was brought on board to develop a more comprehensive vegetation and habitat restoration plan. Great River Greening, a local nonprofit organization that specializes in native vegetation restoration projects and volunteer events, developed an Upland Vegetation Management Program to build on the work previously done by the City. Great River completed the Upland Vegetation Management Plan in September 2015. The following table outlines the anticipated project costs implementing the full plan. Estimated Construction Cost $ 1,230,625.00 Estimated Engineering Cost $ 215,000.00 Total Cost $1,445,625.00 In addition to the above cost estimate, implementation of the project should also assume that there will be a long-term maintenance cost. Long-term maintenance associated would include routine inspections, seasonal mowing and vegetation maintenance, re-seeding, invasive species control and tree pruning. Anticipated annual costs for providing the annual long-term maintenance to the Bass Lake Preserve Upland Vegetation Management ranges from $40,000 to $50,000 annually. The total annual maintenance cost is dependent on the number of site visits per year and the ability to establish native vegetation to reduce the ability of invasive species to flourish. It should be noted that the work would most likely be supervised by the Operations and Recreation Department. Additional staff or a contractor will be needed to maintain the park to the recommended level. Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Page 5 Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Report Page 5 of 10 Recommended Schedule City staff is currently planning on a small scale project as part of 2016 Arbor Day celebration. The following schedule is recommended if the full implementation of the management plan developed by Great River Greening is to be undertaken. Vegetation Management Area Anticipated Schedule Area # 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 VMA 1 VMA 2 VMA 3 VMA 4 VMA 5 Clearing and Grubbing Vegetation Establishment Maintenance Period Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Page 6 Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Report Page 6 of 10 DREDGING An important element of the Bass Lake Preserve Improvements was to evaluate the possibility of creating large open water areas. Investigations showed that this element would face many difficulties. Regulatory approval, method of removal, disposal routes and disposal locations were all important aspects of this project. Staff worked on developing a plan to remove 2-3 feet of bottom material which would prohibit cattail growth. Staff also identified areas along the Preserve which could be used at fill areas cutting the cost of excavation and transportation. Additionally, State and Federal regulations regarding excavating below the ordinary high water level (OHW) would require extensive justification. Projects that change the physical nature of a waterbody are rarely approved. Working on the premise that this project would restore the Bass Lake Preserve to previous condition was our strategy in getting approval from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MDNR), Army Corps of Engineers and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). Because of the scale of the project and its impacts on public waters, an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) was required to assess possible impacts and allow the project to proceed to permitting. Staff contracted with Barr Engineering Company to help prepare the EAW. As part of the EAW process, Staff would need to take numerous soil samples In collecting data for the EAW, Staff found that previous assumptions on the amount of sediment and fill in the Preserve were incorrect. A majority of the Preserve bottom consisted of peat and decomposed vegetation for depths up to at least 4 feet, not the sediment or fill material Staff expected to find. It should also be noted that 2016 was the second year that Staff has attempted complete soil testing in the Preserve area. The goal would be to measure the depth and location of the peat in the Preserve, however this could not be completed due to the lack of frozen winter conditions. Attached to this report is a summary memo from Barr Engineering, summarizing the Bass Lake Preserve findings and recommendations. Based on the findings during the soils investigation, Staff determined that more extensive research was needed on the history of the Bass Lake Preserve. This additional research revealed that while wetlands have been filled in areas such as the railroad tracks, Carpenter Park and the Beltline Business Center, the existing Bass Lake Preserve wetland has always been much the same as it is today. Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Page 7 Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Report Page 7 of 10 HISTORY When Staff first approached improving the Preserve, core assumptions had been that there once existed a deeper basin consisting mostly open water areas and that years of sediment loading was the cause of the cattail environment that exists today. After finding a predominantly peat base, staff began to go back and investigate the history of the Preserve and found that what is now the Bass Lake Preserve may not have had the “lake” characteristics this project set out to restore. In further research conducted at the Minnesota History Center Gale Family Library, Staff found that in 1907, 48 land owners signed a petition to ask Hennepin County to create a County Ditch with the goal of draining the wetland complex known as Bass Lake. On February 3, 1908, a public hearing was held in Hennepin County Court to consider a petition to establish County Ditch 14 which would be cut through the middle of Bass Lake. At the time this petition was submitted, County Ditches could only be established for the purposes of draining flooded lands, marshes and swamps and shallow wetlands with the concurrence of all riparian landowners. While draining wetlands for agriculture and other land uses was an accepted practice at the time, there were strict rules for preventing the draining of lakes. Only basins less than 4 feet in depth and not part of a meandering lake were permitted to be drained under the county ditch rules. The reason published for this petition was “so as to drain the marshy portions of sections 5 and 6”. Rules were established in 1867 which made it a misdemeanor to drain a meandered lake, with a fine of as much as five thousand dollars. In this case, 45 land owners signed the petition and agreed to pay for construction of the ditch. In addition to signing the petition, each landowner would have been assessed the cost of the ditch system. If there had been a hotel or resort (as speculated by some), a depth of 10 feet supporting watercraft activities or the aesthetic qualities of an open water basin it is unlikely all 48 landowners would support the construction of a ditch. This area was part of Minneapolis at the time of the petition. If the basin was open water as previously described, it would have been included as part of the Minneapolis Chain of Lakes. News article from 1912 cites “At present the Milwaukee has a small yard in operation at Bass Lake. It is proposed to fill in the lake, which is little more than a swamp, and extend the yard southward. Earth taken from the Twenty-ninth Street and Hennepin Avenue where tracks are to be lowered, will be used in filling in the lake, so that engineers say there will be ample material to turn what is now a swamp into a first class yard.” All aerial photos of the Preserve dating back 1935 show evidence of significant cattail growth. Traditionally, aerial photos were taken during times of low vegetation growth, so that tree canopy would not block the view of the land. Even in these conditions Bass Lake Preserve showed significant cattail coverage. Based on the 1907 map, the elevation of the south side of the wetland is consistent elevation with the survey work completed in 2014 and 2015. This is a good indication that the current conditions of the south side of the Preserve are representative of its historical state. Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Page 8 Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Report Page 8 of 10 INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS One of the core goals of the Bass Lake Preserve Improvement was to look for upstream improvements which prevent the further degradation of Bass Lake Preserve. This includes removing point sources of phosphorus and sediment as well as providing temporary storage during flood conditions. An inventory of all pipes directly discharging into Bass Lake Preserve was completed. The goal was to identify potential point source sediment loads and install Best Management Practices (BMP’s) to reduce sediment entering the Preserve. Resources utilized in this work include an XP SWMMM stormwater model prepared by Barr Engineering. This model includes the watersheds and pipe systems draining to the basin. Engineering staff identified two locations where silt and dirt were exposed to stormwater runoff to the lake. The first location was a previously abandoned storm sewer line where the pipe blockage had deteriorated and dirt around the structure was leeching into the storm sewer through the breach. This pipe was permanently abandoned as part of the Highway 100 project in 2015 and is no longer a source of pollution. The second site was identified near the water tower along Park Glen Road. Staff discovered an exposed outlet pipe that, under heavy rainfall washes the adjacent gravel driveway into a ditch leading to the Bass Lake Preserve. For this location, staff is proposing to install a new outlet structure which would allow stormwater to drain, but prevent sediment from entering the pipe. Fixing this problem area along with creating a pond has been identified as a priority project to be completed once the Highway 100 construction work is complete. Most of the drainage reaching the Preserve comes through three large storm pipes (102 inch, 98 inch and 92 inch arch pipe) located on the west edges of the lake. In addition to being large pipes, these pipes are partially to fully submerged underwater and rely on the weight of upstream water to discharge stormwater. Inspection has detected sediment accumulation in these pipes, but upon further inspection, it appears to be attributed to in lake sediment transfer, rather than surface sediment loading. Since the pipes are submerged the inverts of the pipes are below or at the bottom of the Preserve. When a storm hits, the upstream pipelines fill with water and discharge into the basin with great force. After a storm event a large hole is evident at the pipe outlets. Once the pipes have discharged, and the system returns to an equilibrium state, the sediment pushed aside during the storm is pulled back into the pipes in a wave like motion. To prevent this condition, a coffer dam or a wall blocking flow from returning into the pipe is needed. Like all work under the normal water elevation, installation of these types of structures requires a permit from the MnDNR. The MnDNR will only permit these types of structures on a temporary basis to clean out sediment. A permanent structure would be needed in Bass Lake Preserve to keep sediment out of the pipes and isolate sediment loading from surface sources. Recommended Projects Keeping the core goals of the Bass Lake Preserve Improvements in mind, Staff is recommending the following improvement projects which will achieve the goals of providing upstream stormwater treatment and provide substantial benefits to other City-wide stormwater management goals and requirements. Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Page 9 Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Report Page 9 of 10 Carpenter Park Sub-Surface Detention Basin This proposed project would create a sub-surface detention basin in Carpenter Park which would collect untreated stormwater from approximately 19.20 acres of urban runoff and remove pollutants while storing up to 70,000 cubic feet of water for potential re-use in irrigating ballfields and play areas in the park. The project would also provide some level of flood relief to areas near City Hall which have a history of flooding during major rain events. The project would be located on the west edge of the park. While similar projects install stormwater cells below grade, in this project the cells would be placed at or near existing grade and filled to raise the elevation of a portion of the park level with Raleigh Avenue. Once construction is complete, the parkland above the cells would be a level, well-draining grass surface for Park use. A similar project, Cottageville Park was recently completed in Hopkins where community gardens and playground equipment sit on top of stormwater treatment cells. The project would provide numerous benefits to the City including: Water Quality Provide treatment and volume control for an estimated 22 acres of previously untreated stormwater discharge Reduces the phosphorus discharge to Bass Lake Preserve by an estimated 26 pounds per year Prevent an estimated 2.8 tons of sediment from entering Bass Lake Preserve annually Volume Control The project would allow storage of stormwater to be re-used in irrigation system on the adjacent ballfields and grass areas. Improved Playfields Convert frequently flooded uneven playfields in to level well-draining play areas. Would accommodate future park improvements. Watershed Stormwater Credits The City would earn water quality credits to use toward future redevelopment projects at the Beltline Station. Estimated Construction Cost $ 900,000.00 Estimated Engineering Cost $ 125,000.00 Total Cost $1,025,000.00 Northeast Corner Wetland A small area of currently- undeveloped City-owned land at the northeast corner of the Preserve can be excavated for use as a stormwater treatment forebay for stormwater coming from watersheds to the north. Developing this area as a stormwater pond would have several benefits, including improved Bass Lake water quality as a result of sediment sequestration in the pond, effectively increasing the viewable area of the Preserve for visitors, and providing additional open-water area within the Preserve. Benefits of this project include: Create pond for water quality/buffer benefits Provide flood storage Improved vegetation Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Page 10 Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Report Page 10 of 10 Removal of dumping area Estimated Construction Cost $ 75,000.00 Estimated Engineering Cost $ 25,000.00 Total Cost $ 100,000.00 Park Glen Drive Improvements This project would install a new catchment structure that would prohibit sediment from reaching a ditch that discharges to Bass Lake Preserve. The treatment basin would not only prevent sediment during stormwater events, it would also treat runoff from snow collection operations. Previous studies have calculated that a 3.9 ac-ft basin could be created at this location and would remove between 70% -90% of total suspended solids from the watershed. Estimated Construction Cost $ 50,000.00 Estimated Engineering Cost $ 10,000.00 Total Cost $ 70,000.00 Outlet improvements Currently the storm sewer outlet at the east end of the Preserve, is in poor condition and should be replaced. Replacing the outlet would provide for improved aesthetics, and improved capture of floating debris that would otherwise flow out Bass Lake Preserve during storm events. The new outlet structure would allow for improved maintenance, operations, and cleaning. Benefits of this project include: Removal of broken wooden structure Lower/replace large manhole in park Ability for lake water level manipulations Estimated Construction Cost $ 70,000.00 Estimated Engineering Cost $ 10,000.00 Total Cost $ 80,000.00 Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Page 11 LIST OF FIGURES Bass Lake Restoration Project- 2012 aerial photo Tree Survey WSB Floating Mat and Soft Sediment Investigation Report (August 2015) Preliminary Sediment and Sampling Results (July 2015) Floating Mat Cross Section 1891 Historical Plat of Minneapolis and St. Louis Park 1913 Historical Topographical Map of Hennepin County 1937 Historical Photo 1945 Historical Photo 1956 Historical Photo 1962 Historical Photo 1967 Historical Photo 1971 Historical Photo Original Public Notice for County Ditch 14 Newspaper Article for Railroad Expansion Historic and Current Wetland Boundaries Existing Strom Sewer Map Storm Sewer Inundation Map Proposed Improvements Carpenter Park Proposed Underground Stormwater Management Facility Location Map (Figure 1) Carpenter Park Figure 2 Barr Engineering Technical Memorandum Previous Discussions and Studies Engineering Department’s Workflow Timeline Preserve Restoration Project Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Page 12 3 5 T H S T PARK G L E N R D BELTLINEB LVD3 6 T H S T 3 6 1 /2 S T FRANCE AVECP RR 34TH ST RANDAL L A V E GLENHURST AVEHUNTINGTON AVE200 0 200100 Feet Bass Lake Restoration Project 2012 Areial PhotoLegend Project Area Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Page 13 nmnmnm nmnm nm nm nmnmnm nmnmnmnmnm nm nm nm nmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnm nm nmnmnmnmnmnmnm nmnmnmnmnmnmnm nmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnm nmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnm nmnmnmnm nmnm nmnm nmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnm nmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnm nmnmnm nmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnm nmnmnm nmnmnmnmnmnmnmnm nmnmnmnm nm nmnmnm nmnmnm nmnmnmnmnmnm nmnmnm nmnmnmnmnm nmnmnmnm nmnmnmnmnmnm nm nmnmnm nm nmnmnmnmnmnmnmnm nmnmnmnmnmnmnm nm nmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnm nmnmnmnmnmnm nmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnm nmnm nmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnm nmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnm nm nmnm nm nmnmnmnmnm nm nmnm nmnmnmnmnmnm nm nmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnm nm nmnm nmnm nmnmnm nmnm nmnmnmnm nm nmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnm nm nmnmnmnmnmnmnmnm nmnmnm nmnmnm nmnmnmnmnmnmnm nmnmnmnm nmnm nm nm nmnm nmnmnm nm nmnmnmnmnm nm nmnm nmnmnmnmnm nmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnm nm nm nm nm nmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnm nmnmnm nmnmnmnmnmnmnm nmnmnm nm nm nmnmnmnmnmnmnm nmnmnm nmnm nmnmnmnmnmnm nmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnm nm nm nmnmnmnm nmnmnmnmnm nmnmnmnmnm nmnmnmnm nmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnm nmnm nm nmnm nm nm nmnm nmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnm nmnmnmnm nmnm nm nm nmnm nm nmnm nmnm nmnmnmnm nmnmnmnm nmnmnmnmnmnm nmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnm nmnmnmnmnmnmnm nmnm nmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnm nmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnm nm nmnmnm nm nmnmnmnmnmnm nm nmnmnmnmnmnmnm nmnm nmnmnmnmnmnmnmnm nmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnm nm nmnmnm nmnmnmnm nmnm nm nmnmnmnmnm nmnmnmnm nmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnm nmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnm nmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnm nmnmnmnm nmnmnm nm nmnmnm nmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnm nm nmnmnmnm nm nm nmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnm nm nmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnm nmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnm nmnmnm nmnmnmnmnm nmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnm nm nm nm nmnm nmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnm nmnmnmnmnm nm nmnm nmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnm nmnmnmnm nmnmnmnm nm nm nmnmnmnmnmnmnm nmnmnmnm nmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnm nm nmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnm nmnm nmnmnmnm nm nmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnm nm nm nmnmnmnm nmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnm nmnmnmnmnm nm nmnmnmnm nm nmnm nm nmnm nm nm nmnmnm nmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnm nm nm nm nm nmnm nmnmnmnmnmnmnmnm nm nmnmnm nmnmnmnmnmnm nm nmnmnmnm nmnmnmnmnm nm nmnm nm nmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnm nmnmnmnmnmnmnm nmnmnm nmnmnmnmnmnmnmnm nmnmnm nmnmnmnmnm nm nmnmnm nm nmnm nmnm nmnmnmnm nm nm nm nm nm nm nmnmnm nmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnm nm nmnm nm nmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnm nmnm nm nmnm nmnmnmnmnm nmnmnm nmnmnmnm nm nmnmnmnmnm nmnmnmnmnm nmnm nmnmnmnm nm nm nmnm nm nm nm nmnmnmnm nmnm nm nm nmnm nm nmnmnm ±200 0 200100 Feet Bass Lake PreserveRestoration Project Legend Project Area nm Balsam Fir nm Boxelder nm Silver Maple nm Hackberry nm White Ash nm Black Ash nm Green Ash nm Black Walnut nm Crabapple nm Mulberry nm Blue Spruce nm White Popular nm Eastern Cottonwood nm Big-tooth Aspen nm Quaking Aspen nm Bur Oak nm Common buckthorn nm Black Willow nm American Basswood nm American Elm nm Slippery Elm Existing Trail Tree Survey Tree Survey Note Trees shown on this map consist of significant trees, greater than 4 inched 4 feet above ground. Trees were tagged, the species identified, and the overall condition rated. Completed August / September 2014 Common Name: Total:Balsam Fir 3Silver Maple 3Hackberry9White Ash 4Black Ash 11Green Ash 429Black Walnut 2Crabapple1Mulberry19Blue Spruce 7White Popular 1Eastern Cottonwood 507Big-tooth Aspen 2Quaking Aspen 4Bur Oak 2Black Willow 44American Basswood 1American Elm 75Slippery Elm 20Boxelder362European Buckthorn 36 Total:1542 Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Page 14 engineering planning environmental construction 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-541-1700 August 21, 2015 Erick Francis Water Resource Manager, City of St. Louis Park 5005 Minnetonka Blvd. St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Re: Floating Mat and Soft Sediment Investigation Bass Lake Restoration Project WSB Project No. 2296-070 Dear Mr. Francis: WSB & Associates, Inc. (WSB) was retained by the City of St. Louis Park (the City) to conduct a Floating Root Mat and Soft Sediment Investigation at Bass Lake located in St. Louis Park, Minnesota (the Site). The purpose of this investigation is to further assess the presence of a floating root mat and underlying soft sediment at the Site. WSB understands that the investigation results will be used for planning purposes to facilitate a future restoration project at the Site. The investigation was completed in accordance with WSB’s proposal to the City dated July 27, 2015. Site Location The Site is located in the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 6, Township 28 North, and Range 24 West, in Hennepin County, Minnesota. The Site is currently developed as a recreational park and is adjoined by commercial properties to the west and residential properties to the north, east, and south. The Site is approximately 80 acres is size. A Site location map is included as Figure 1. Sampling Methods The purpose of the investigation was to further assess the presence of a floating root mat and underlying soft sediment at the Site. Mr. Tony Miller and Mr. Dan Rangitsch of WSB performed the investigation activities on August 4, 2015 and August 7, 2015. A canoe was used to navigate the Site and transport the equipment used for data collection. The Site walking path Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.com K:\02296-070\Admin\Docs\Mat - Sediment Sampling\1 - Letter Report - text.docx Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Page 15 Mr. Erick Francis August 21, 2015 Page 2 was also used to access perimeter investigation locations. The following tasks were conducted by WSB as part of the investigation: • Collected inlet/outlet pipe water level measurements at the each sampling event. The water levels were collected at the inlet pipe (located on the northwestern portion of the Site) and outlet pipe (located on the eastern portion of the Site). The depth was measured from the bottom of the pipe (invert) to the water surface using a measuring tape. The measurements were recorded to the nearest tenth of a foot. • Advanced 19 test probes (1-19) at the Site to measure the thickness of the floating root mat, the separation between the root mat and the soft sediment (if present), and the depth of soft sediment. The measurements were taken using a 6.5 foot metal channel advanced using hand pressure and recorded to the nearest tenth of a foot. • Advanced 7 test pits (20-26) at the Site to assess the root mat and soft sediment present at the Site. The test pits were advanced by hand using a spade shovel to penetrate the root mat. The measurements were taken using a 6.5 foot metal channel and recorded to nearest tenth of a foot. • Collected photographic documentation of general investigation activities. Investigation Results The investigation test locations are shown on Figure 2. The results of the investigation are summarized on Table 1. Select investigation photographs are included as Appendix A. Below is a summary of the investigating results: Test Probes / Pits Cattails were present at all test locations with roots ranging from 0.5 to greater than 2.2 feet in thickness. The root mats consisted of cattail roots mixed with organics and with very fine silt. Soft sediment observed below root mats consisted of very fine muck followed by silty clay that ranged from 4.2 to greater than 6.5 feet in depth. A floating root mat was observed at 7 of the 26 test locations. At the observed floating root mat locations, 0.9 to 2.1 feet of separation was present between the root mat and soft sediment below. Water Level The Site outlet water level was approximately 0.1 foot higher during the August 7, 2015 sampling event compared to the August 4, 2015 sampling event. The difference in water level measurements was due to a rain event. According to the Minnesota Climatology Working Group website, 0.92 inches of precipitation was recorded on August 7, 2015. The water level at the Site appeared to be within normal levels during both test events. Below are tables summarizing the inlet/outlet water elevations. Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Page 16 Mr. Erick Francis August 21, 2015 Page 3 Inlet Pipe (Northwest) Date Surface of water to Inlet (ft.) Pipe Inlet Elevation (ft.) Water Elevation (ft.) 8-4-15 5.1 867.93 873.03 8-7-15 5.2 876.93 873.13 Assumed no sediment in the pipe for elevation calculations Outlet Pipe (East) Date Surface of water to Inlet (ft.) Pipe Inlet Elevation (ft.) Water Elevation (ft.) 8-4-15 0.4 870.63 871.03 8-7-15 1.25 870.63 871.88 Conclusions and Discussion The observed cattail root mat and soft sediment materials were generally consistent across the Site. However, a floating root mat was only observed in the center and southern portions of the Site (see Figure 2). The water conditions appeared to be within normal levels at the Site during both investigations. It should be noted that the body weight of the testers may have suppressed the floating mat (if present) into the soft sediment during sampling resulting in no observable separation below the root mat and soft sediment. An ideal time to test for the presence of a float mat would be during events of elevated water levels. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. Ryan Spencer Senior Environmental Scientist Attachments Figure 1 – Site Location Figure 2 – Test Locations Table 1 – Investigation Results Summary Appendix A – Photographic Documentation Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Page 17 FIGURES Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Page 18 2383.027689K:\02296-070\GIS\Maps\Fig1_Site_Location.mxdBass Lak e Restoration Project Site Location Figure 1 – Site Location - 0 800400Feet Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Page 19 XY XY XY XY ^_ XY XY ^_XY XY XY XY #* ^_ XY XY XY ^_ XY ^_ XY #* ^_ XY XY XYXY ^_ XY XY XY XY XY XY ^_ 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 26 19 18 17 16 25 15 24 14 23 13 12 11 22 10 21 20 2383.027689 Document Path: K:\02296-070\GIS\Maps\Fig2_ProbeTestLocation.mxd0 450Feet / #*Intlet (Northwest) #*Outlet (East) XY Probe ^_Test Pit Storm Structures Storm Pipes Approximate Floating Root Mat Area Parcels Site Location Bass Lake Restoration Project Figure 2 - Probe / Test Locations Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Page 20 TABLES Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Page 21 Root Mat and Soft Sediment Investigation ResultsBass Lake, St. Louis Park, MNSample IDSample DateSample TypeRoot Mass Thickness (ft.) Floating Root Mat ObservedSeparation Between Root Mat and Soft Sediment (ft.)Soft Sediment Muck Depth (ft.)Soft Sediment Silty Clay Depth (ft.)Notes1 8/4/2015 Probe 1.3No01.3 ‐ 55 ‐ 6.3Cattails, standing water at surface2 8/4/2015 Probe 1.3No01.3 ‐ 3.63.6 ‐ >6.5Cattails, standing water at surface3 8/4/2015 Probe 1.4No01.4 ‐ 2.82.8 ‐ 4.2Cattails 4 8/4/2015 Probe 1.4No01.4 ‐ 4.14.1 ‐ >6.5Cattails 5 8/4/2015 Probe 1.4No01.4 ‐ 4.44.4 ‐ >6.5Cattails, standing water at surface6 8/4/2015 Probe 1.4Yes12.4 ‐ 4.74.7 ‐ >6.5Cattails, floating mat present7 8/4/2015 Probe 0.6Yes2.12.7 ‐ 4.64.6 ‐ >6.5Cattails, floating mat present8 8/4/2015 Probe 1.1Yes1.72.8 ‐ 4.74.7 ‐ >6.5Cattails, floating mat present9 8/4/2015 Probe >2.2No0>2.2 ‐ 4.34.3 ‐ >6.5Cattails, standing water at surface10 8/4/2015 Probe 1.6Yes1.32.9 ‐ 3.83.8 ‐ >6.5Cattails, standing water at surface11 8/7/2015 Probe 1.7Yes0.92.6 ‐ 4.94.9 ‐ >6.5Cattails 12 8/7/2015 Probe 1.7No01.7 ‐ 55 ‐ >6.5Cattails, standing water at surface13 8/7/2015 Probe 1.5Yes1.12.6 ‐ 4.84.8 ‐ >6.5Cattails 14 8/7/2015 Probe 1No01 ‐ 5.25.2 ‐ >6.5Cattails 15 8/7/2015 Probe 1.8No01.8 ‐ 6.26.2 ‐ >6.5Cattails 16 8/7/2015 Probe 1.3No01.3 ‐ 4.74.7 ‐ >6.5Cattails 17 8/7/2015 Probe 1.1No01.1 ‐ 4.24.2 ‐ 5.9Cattails 18 8/7/2015 Probe 1.2No01.2 ‐ 4.34.3 ‐ >6.5Cattails 19 8/7/2015 Probe 1No01 ‐ 6.36.3 ‐ >6.5Cattails, standing water at surface20 8/4/2015 Test Pit 1.7*No01.7 ‐ 4.44.4 ‐ >6.5Cattails, standing water at surface, sediment consisted of muck followed by silty clay21 8/4/2015 Test Pit 1.4*No01.4 ‐ 4.84.8 ‐ >6.5Cattails, standing water at surface, sediment consisted of muck followed by silty clay22 8/7/2015 Test Pit 0.5*No00.5 ‐ 4.44.4 ‐ >6.5Cattails, standing water at surface, sediment consisted of muck followed by silty clay23 8/7/2015 Test Pit 1.2*Yes1.83 ‐ 4.64.6 ‐ >6.5Cattails, standing water at surface, sediment consisted of muck followed by silty clay24 8/7/2015 Test Pit 2*No02 ‐ 4.74.7 ‐ >6.5Cattails, standing water at surface, sediment consisted of muck followed by silty clay25 8/7/2015 Test Pit 1.3*No01.3 ‐ 4.94.9 ‐ >6.5Cattails, standing water at surface, sediment consisted of muck followed by silty clay26 8/7/2015 Test Pit 1.5*No01.5 ‐ 4.74.7 ‐ 5.9Cattails, standing water at surface, sediment consisted of muck followed by silty clay> = Greater than hand measuring device (6.5 ft.)* = Consisted of cattail roots mixed with organics and very fine siltOrange = Floating root mat observed (7 locations)Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve ImprovementsPage 22 APPENDIX A Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Page 23 Photo Album ‐Bass LakeRoot Mat and Sediment Samplingby Ryan SpencerSpecial Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve ImprovementsPage 24 Photo 1 ‐Location 1, sediment measurementPhoto 2 ‐Location 2, sediment measurementPhoto 3 ‐Location 3, silty clay sedimentPhoto 4 ‐Location 4, sediment measurementSpecial Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve ImprovementsPage 25 Photo 5 ‐Location 6, silty clay sedimentPhoto 6 ‐Location 7, sediment measurmentPhoto 7 ‐Location 8, root mat materialPhoto 8 ‐Location 9, sediment measurementSpecial Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve ImprovementsPage 26 Photo 9 ‐Location 10, sediment measurementPhoto 10 ‐Location 12, sediment measurementPhoto 11 ‐Location 19, silty clay sedimentPhoto 12 ‐Location 19, sediment measurementSpecial Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve ImprovementsPage 27 Photo 13 ‐Location 21, root mat materialPhoto 14 ‐Location 21, silty clay sedimentPhoto 15 ‐Location 22, root mat materialPhoto 16 ‐Location 22, sediment mesaurementSpecial Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve ImprovementsPage 28 Photo 17 ‐Location 23, root mat materialPhoto 18 ‐Location 24, root mat materialPhoto 19 ‐Location 25, root materialPhoto 20 ‐Location 26, silty clay materialSpecial Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve ImprovementsPage 29 5005 Minnetonka Boulevard St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Tel: 952-924-2500 eMail: info@stlouispark.org ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 5005 Minnetonka Boulevard St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416-2290 Phone: 952-924-2500 Fax: 952-924-2663 Hearing Impaired: 952-924-2518 Website: www.stlouispark.org Memorandum To: Deb Heiser, City of St. Louis Park Philip Elkin, City of St. Louis Park From: Erick Francis, City of St. Louis Park Date: July 6, 2015 Re: Bass Lake Preliminary Sediment Sampling Results Bass Lake Restoration Project City Project No. 4014-1000 The purpose of this memorandum is to summarize the results of a preliminary sediment sampling effort within Bass Lake to determine if there is a presence of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) within a cross-section of the Lake. This investigation will provide guidance on future sediment sampling requirements, estimated dredging costs, and to aid in further defining overall project costs. SEDIMENT SAMPLING RESULTS Sediment samples were collected at six locations within Bass Lake, as shown on attached Figure. Sediment samples were analyzed to determine the concentration of metals, total B[a]P equivalents (cPAHs), carcinogenic and noncarcinogenic PAH’s found within the sediment to determine a Soil Reference Value (SRV). Sediment sampling results are outlined below: x Identified Soil Reference Value: o Sample 7 SRV Level: Non-detect o Sample 8 SRV Level: 0.470 o Sample 9 SRV Level: 0.547 o Sample 10 SRV Level: 0.205 o Sample 11 SRV Level: 0.175 o Sample 12 SRV Level: 1.983 o Sample 13 SRV Level: 0.060 o Sample 14 SRV Level: 0.135 o Sample 15 SRV Level: 0.557 o Sample 16 SRV Level: 0.743 o Sample 17 SRV Level: 0.147 o Sample 18 SRV Level: 0.255 o Sample 19 SRV Level: 0.446 O Sample 20 SRV Level: 0.732 Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Page 30 SEDIMENT SAMPLING FINDINGS The findings outlined below identify the SRV Level for each of the sediment samples and defines the proper handling and disposal requirements of the excavated material. x Pollutant concentrations are fairly consistent around the Lake with only one sample with an SRV level greater than 1. x Sediment sampling indicates that the dredge material may be disposed of in residential or industrial areas. x Sample 12 has a SRV value of 1.983, which can be disposed of in an industrial or commercial area o It is recommended that this material be excavated and hauled separate from the other material to ensure that it won’t end up in a residential fill location or be left in place. x Dredge material shall be easily disposed and the cost associated with disposal will be greatly reduced by not having to landfill the material due to the low SRV levels. Recommendations The following recommendations provide options on how to approach additional sampling requirements, to further define SRV Levels within the Lake estimated costs for excavated material. x Dredged material would make great topsoil for the City parks due to its high organic content. x Material could be stockpiled just down the street at the Parkglen Water Tower site and used as necessary in park areas around the City. x Additional mixing, or pulverizing, of the dredged material may be required to completely breakdown the organic material but will be unknown until the material has been excavated and hauled to the storage site. This second round of sampling and analysis has provided valuable information on where to dispose of the material and what to anticipate for typical dredging costs. Further information on dredge material can be found at the following website: o http://www.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/view-document.html?gid=6273 If you have further questions about the contamination Level or the sediment deposition of this pond, please feel free to contact me at 763-512-5251. Attachments: Sediment Sampling Location Figures Sediment Sampling Analysis Pace Analytical Laboratory Report If you have any questions or would like further information concerning cPAH testing and analysis, please contact me at (952) 924-2690 or efrancis@stlouispark.com. Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Page 31 Project Location:Sampling Date:Classical Chemistry Parameters (%WT)Percent MoisturenaN/A N/AMETALS / METALLOIDS(mg/kg)Arsenic920NDNDNDCopper100 9000PAH COMPOUNDS(mg/kg)Acenaphthene1,200 5,260AcenaphthylenenanaAnthracene7,880 45,400Benzo[e]pyrenenanaBenzo[g,h,i]perylenenanaBenzofluoranthenes (Total)nanaCarbazolenana2-ChloronaphthalenenanaDibenzofurannanaFluoranthene1,080 6,800Fluorene850 4,1201-Methylnaphthalenenana2-MethylnaphthalenenanaNaphthalene1028PerylenenanaPhenanthrenenanaPyrene890 5,800Quinoline**47Equiv.BAP Equiv.BAP Equiv.BAP Equiv.BAP Equiv.BAP Equiv.BAP Equiv.Benzo[a]anthracene0.1ND 0.000 0.205 0.021 0.229 0.023 0.083 0.008 0.072 0.007 0.671 0.0670.000 0.000Benzo[b&j]fluoranthene*0.2ND 0.000 0.617 0.123 0.753 0.151 0.290 0.058 0.244 0.049 2.400 0.4800.000 0.000Benzo[k]fluoranthene*0ND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0000.000 0.000Benzo[a]pyrene1ND 0.000 0.308 0.308 0.352 0.352 0.137 0.137 0.118 0.118 1.020 1.0200.059 0.059Chrysene0.01ND 0.000 0.264 0.003 0.319 0.003 0.129 0.001 0.109 0.001 1.000 0.0100.055 0.001Dibenz[a,h]acridine0.1ND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0000.000 0.000Dibenz[a,h]anthracene0.56ND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.141 0.0790.000 0.0007H-Dibenzo[c,g]carbazole1ND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0000.000 0.000Dibenzo[a,e]pyrene1ND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.140 0.1400.000 0.000Dibenzo[a,h]pyrene10ND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0000.000 0.000Dibenzo[a,i]pyrene10ND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000Dibenzo[a,l]pyrene10ND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0000.000 0.0007,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene34ND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0000.000 0.000Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene0.1ND 0.000 0.150 0.015 0.186 0.019 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.489 0.049 0.000 0.0003-Methylcholanthrene3ND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0005-Methylchrysene1ND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.138 0.1380.000 0.000230.0000.4700.5470.2050.1751.9830.060LLEGEND: NDSRV = soil reference valuePAHs = polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbonsB[a]P = benzo[a]pyrenena Denotes required testing but no SRV perimeter has been outlined by the MPCA j: Detected but below the Method Reporting Limit; result is an estimated concentrationSite Conc.NDNDNDNDND0.05NDNDNDND0.09NDNDNDNDNDND0.10Boring Location Number / Soil Depth Below Surface (feet)2 feetStormwater Pond Sediment Management Contamination Calculation WorksheetBass Lake Sediment Sampling ResultsMonday, May 18, 20151378.8%5.94.084.9%6.41088.0%-14.3786.5PARAMETERMethod reporting Limit*MPCA Soil Reference Value (SRV) ThresholdLevel 1 less thanLevel 2 less than34.7NDNDNDND0.1610.459ND0.092ND0.3170.2090.753ND0.290ND0.189ND0.078NDND1.560ND0.2351.420Site Conc.NDNDND0.2270.4551NDNDNDNDND0.2780.9400.4882.4000.188Site Conc.NDND0.211NDNDND85.8%-8.4NDNDND0.097ND0.244NDSite Conc.NDNDNDNDNDND0.118NDNDNDNDNDTOTAL BAP EQUIVALENT***Site Conc.NDNDNDND0.170NDNDNDND1Relative Potency FactorBENZO(a)PYRENE (BAP)/BAP EQUIVALENTS (mg/kg)ND89.0%-11.4NDDenotes that parameter was not detected in sampleDenotes SRV 1 - suitable for use in residential areasNDNDND0.518ND12.40.075ND0.1700.2480.074NDNDNDND*** B[a]P Equivalent - Each contaminant sample concentration is multiplied by it's Potency Equivalency Factor (PEF) to obtain a B[a]P equivalent concentration. All B[a]P equivalent concentrations are summed to calculate the total B[a]P equivalent concentration. For nondetect data, use the procedures outlined in Appendix B of "Managing Stormwater Sediment BMP Guidance For Municipalities". ** Quinloine is a carcinogenic PAH that does not have a PEF value. Therefore, it is not included in the B[a]P equivalent calculation. It is included in the noncarcinogenic PAH section and evaluated separately.Sample Depth:* 1 Reporting Limits- See lab analytical results reports due to differences in reporting limitsNDThe conclusions summarized within this report are based on field observations and analytical testing of the submitted samples. In performing this investigation, WSB used the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar circumstances by reputable members of its profession practicing in the same location. No other warranty is made or intended.It is the intent of this Stormwater Pond Sediment Management Contamination Calculation Worksheet to determine the Soil Reference Value (SRV) for the sediment samples collected at the identified location. The cPAH Compounds, SRV Thresholds, and BAP Equivalencies are all based on the Managing Stormwater Sediment Best Management Practice Guidance for Municipalities guidance document dated June 2012, issued by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.* Total Benzofluoranthenes result identified within the PAH Compounds is a cumulative total of Benzo[b]fluoranthene, Benzo[j]fluoranthene, and Benzo[k]fluoranthene.83.8%89.6%1NDND0.438NDNDNDNDNDSite Conc.Site Conc.12119Denotes SRV 3 - must be disposed of in MPCA approved landfillND0.4020.1320.068NDND0.61724.946.6NDDenotes SRV 2 - suitable for use in industrial areasNDNDO:\Pubwks\Projects\Current or Future\4014-4000 Storm- Bass Lake Preserve Rehab\Data\Sediment Sampling\05182015\4014-1000_06082015_Dredging Lab Results7/6/2015Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve ImprovementsPage 32 Project Location:Sampling Date:Classical Chemistry Parameters (%WT)Percent MoisturenaN/A N/AMETALS / METALLOIDS(mg/kg)Arsenic920NDNDNDNDCopper100 9000PAH COMPOUNDS(mg/kg)Acenaphthene1,200 5,260AcenaphthylenenanaAnthracene7,880 45,400Benzo[e]pyrenenanaBenzo[g,h,i]perylenenanaBenzofluoranthenes (Total)nanaCarbazolenana2-ChloronaphthalenenanaDibenzofurannanaFluoranthene1,080 6,800Fluorene850 4,1201-Methylnaphthalenenana2-MethylnaphthalenenanaNaphthalene1028PerylenenanaPhenanthrenenanaPyrene890 5,800Quinoline**47Equiv.BAP Equiv.BAP Equiv.BAP Equiv.BAP Equiv.BAP Equiv.BAP Equiv.Benzo[a]anthracene0.10.060 0.006 0.216 0.022 0.267 0.027 0.000 0.000 0.101 0.010 0.158 0.0160.299 0.030Benzo[b&j]fluoranthene*0.20.190 0.038 0.832 0.166 0.954 0.191 0.000 0.000 0.362 0.072 0.664 0.1330.987 0.197Benzo[k]fluoranthene*0ND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0000.000 0.000Benzo[a]pyrene10.090 0.090 0.349 0.349 0.408 0.408 0.147 0.147 0.164 0.164 0.281 0.2810.468 0.468Chrysene0.010.085 0.001 0.350 0.004 0.394 0.004 0.000 0.000 0.153 0.002 0.272 0.0030.458 0.005Dibenz[a,h]acridine0.1ND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0000.000 0.000Dibenz[a,h]anthracene0.56ND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.065 0.036 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0000.000 0.0007H-Dibenzo[c,g]carbazole1ND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0000.000 0.000Dibenzo[a,e]pyrene1ND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.059 0.059 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0000.000 0.000Dibenzo[a,h]pyrene10ND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0000.000 0.000Dibenzo[a,i]pyrene10ND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000Dibenzo[a,l]pyrene10ND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0000.000 0.0007,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene34ND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0000.000 0.000Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene0.1ND 0.000 0.165 0.017 0.188 0.019 0.000 0.000 0.072 0.007 0.135 0.014 0.325 0.0333-Methylcholanthrene3ND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0005-Methylchrysene1ND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0000.000 0.000230.1350.5570.7430.1470.2550.4460.732LLEGEND: NDSRV = soil reference valuePAHs = polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbonsB[a]P = benzo[a]pyrenena Denotes required testing but no SRV perimeter has been outlined by the MPCA j: Detected but below the Method Reporting Limit; result is an estimated concentrationThe conclusions summarized within this report are based on field observations and analytical testing of the submitted samples. In performing this investigation, WSB used the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar circumstances by reputable members of its profession practicing in the same location. No other warranty is made or intended.Denotes SRV 1 - suitable for use in residential areasDenotes SRV 2 - suitable for use in industrial areasDenotes SRV 3 - must be disposed of in MPCA approved landfill* 1 Reporting Limits- See lab analytical results reports due to differences in reporting limits** Quinloine is a carcinogenic PAH that does not have a PEF value. Therefore, it is not included in the B[a]P equivalent calculation. It is included in the noncarcinogenic PAH section and evaluated separately.*** B[a]P Equivalent - Each contaminant sample concentration is multiplied by it's Potency Equivalency Factor (PEF) to obtain a B[a]P equivalent concentration. All B[a]P equivalent concentrations are summed to calculate the total B[a]P equivalent concentration. For nondetect data, use the procedures outlined in Appendix B of "Managing Stormwater Sediment BMP Guidance For Municipalities". * Total Benzofluoranthenes result identified within the PAH Compounds is a cumulative total of Benzo[b]fluoranthene, Benzo[j]fluoranthene, and Benzo[k]fluoranthene.It is the intent of this Stormwater Pond Sediment Management Contamination Calculation Worksheet to determine the Soil Reference Value (SRV) for the sediment samples collected at the identified location. The cPAH Compounds, SRV Thresholds, and BAP Equivalencies are all based on the Managing Stormwater Sediment Best Management Practice Guidance for Municipalities guidance document dated June 2012, issued by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.Site Conc.Site Conc.1Relative Potency FactorTOTAL BAP EQUIVALENT***Denotes that parameter was not detected in sampleBENZO(a)PYRENE (BAP)/BAP EQUIVALENTS (mg/kg)Site Conc.Site Conc.Site Conc.Site Conc.Site Conc.0.70NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.1260.5450.6180.2310.2460.405ND0.0600.2220.248ND0.1010.1660.29ND0.0760.086NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND0.1420.6130.6880.2430.2690.4490.77NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND0.400.1900.8320.954ND0.3620.6640.99ND0.1800.203ND0.0790.151NDND0.097ND0.0740.3220.368ND0.1440.2640.4213.814.210.712.717.115.41NDNDNDNDNDND0.1040.126NDNDNDND0.0950.111NDND0.1021-6.35.26.3-192078.5%83.6%82.3%86.3%83.8%88.9%90.6%Level 2 less than1415161718--8.2Stormwater Pond Sediment Management Contamination Calculation WorksheetBass Lake Sediment Sampling ResultsMonday, May 18, 2015PARAMETERMethod reporting Limit*MPCA Soil Reference Value (SRV) ThresholdBoring Location Number / Soil Depth Below Surface (feet)Sample Depth:2 feetLevel 1 less thanO:\Pubwks\Projects\Current or Future\4014-4000 Storm- Bass Lake Preserve Rehab\Data\Sediment Sampling\05182015\4014-1000_06082015_Dredging Lab Results7/6/2015Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve ImprovementsPage 33 ^_^_^_^_^_^_^_^_^_^_^_^_^_^_PABELTLINEBLVD36THSTRLakeBassND0.4700.5470.2050.1751.9830.0600.1350.5570.7430.1470.2550.4460.7327891011121314151617181920±2000200100FeetBass Lake Restoration ProjectLegend^_Sediment Sampling Locations (05/18/2015)Bass Lake PreserveTrails"?BStorm StructrueStorm MainsProperty BoundaryStormwater Pond PAH SedimentSampling LocationsNotes:ND denotes analyte was not detectedPAH denotes Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbonDredged Material is categorized into three Soil Reference Value Management Levels:•SRV Level 1: suitable for use or reuse on properties with a residential or recreational use category;Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve ImprovementsPage 34 Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve ImprovementsPage 35 Bass Lake PreserveRestoration Project Ü 1891 Historical Plat of Minneapolisand St. Louis Park No Scale Historical photos obtained fromMinnesota Historical Secoity Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Page 36 Bass Lake PreserveRestoration Project Ü 1913 Historical Topographic Mapof Hennepin County No Scale Historical photos obtained fromHennepin County Historical Secoity Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Page 37 Bass Lake PreserveRestoration Project Bass Lake Preserve Ü 1937 Historical Aerial Photo No Scale Historical photos obtained fromMinnesota Historical Aerial Photographs Online Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Page 38 Bass Lake PreserveRestoration Project Bass Lake Preserve Ü 1945 Historical Aerial Photo No Scale Historical photos obtained fromMinnesota Historical Aerial Photographs Online Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Page 39 Bass Lake PreserveRestoration Project Bass Lake Preserve Ü 1956 Historical Aerial Photo No Scale Historical photos obtained fromMinnesota Historical Aerial Photographs Online Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Page 40 Bass Lake PreserveRestoration Project Bass Lake Preserve Ü 1962 Historical Aerial Photo No Scale Historical photos obtained fromMinnesota Historical Aerial Photographs Online Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Page 41 Bass Lake PreserveRestoration Project Bass Lake Preserve Ü 1967 Historical Aerial Photo No Scale Historical photos obtained fromMinnesota Historical Aerial Photographs Online Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Page 42 Bass Lake PreserveRestoration Project Bass Lake Preserve Ü 1971 Historical Aerial Photo No Scale Historical photos obtained fromMinnesota Historical Aerial Photographs Online Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Page 43 Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Page 44 Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve ImprovementsPage 45 Bass Lake PreserveRestroation Project Historic & Current Wetland Boundaries 874886888878890892 876894 902896900 898880 884 90 4 87 2 8 7 0 882908 912910906 886 876880 892904 8 7 6 8 7 8 874 904900892884 890 902874 90 2 888884 908880906 896 882878 888878 900 8748 8 0 886 882884880904878874888 880 882 87890891088090 0 8 8 2 88 2 878 896890882 874888888 894896894878904902 87 4 9048 9 0 904894 884904878874888888 874 904 878 910888 888 8 7 2 874 88 2 896 878 884 892 882908 874894874900882 9108 8 6 886 880 872884 876 88088887889487887291288889 2 878 886 892 894 880876880900874874896886894 884 882 886 886876 872 878 896 888 888892880 8 7 4 910 896894884 884892896 878874 906 874 876884908884880880874888888884 900 906 888 874892904880876 878 902886 87887688289088687 4892886 890876898886894 8 9 8 89 2 8 7 4894878 890 898882882886890902880 882886 902884904886888 876898900 904 888878908896884 900880874 882874880 9 0 0 874886 902 890874 878880884882 896 894 898 900878890 900 892 8 7 4910882 898894890 884902884 87 8892 8788 8 6 896 88 0 900886876878878880 886 900892 87488 2 878 880 8 8 6 898902896 886 880 874 908890 880880 886898 884 872 884 874890 880 902900874 882 9088 7 4886 878898 890896 906886876882880906874878890 874 898 878 880 884 900 884878890874880892 898 900902884 874882 878 8 7 4 8908 7 4 882 8 8 0 900898892 9109 0 8 88 2 874 882 876904 880 8 8 2890 880 8848908 9 8 880902874896878 878896 90 0 890892 874 872888900904884 8 7 4 886 9048748748 7 4 900882 872 906 882890 892878880 878 904 890 874 888884 894 88 0 886 896874880876 8808 8 2 878898898884 878 888882904 88 6 888 890 880 874876880874 876 874878890 896884 878 876 886 884882 Legend City Limits Delineated Wetland Boundary (2014) Historic Wetland Boundaries Original Ditch Alignments Index Intermediate Ü 0 500 1,000250 Feet Note: Historic data was obtained from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. It is estimated that about half of the original wetland has been filled. The original surface water elevation for Bass Lake is undetermined. Ditch #14 was constructed sometime before 1908. Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Page 46 48 1 0 2 907242 12362118 027 24 30 81 5 60543366 1 0 181 2 18 12 12 124215 36 18 18 15 10181512 1215 12 12 48 1 8 12 1 2 421 0 10151 0 18 15 121215 121215 15 1248 12120 12 12 1212121236 1521 1202415Bass Lake RestorationProject Existing Storm Sewer Map Legend CB CBMH INLET LIFT STA NODE OUTFALL OUTLET STMH STMVL Storm Mains 0 250 500125 Feet Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Page 47 Bass Lake Preserve Restoration Project Storm SewerInundation Map EXCEL SI O R B L V D 3 5 T H S T 38TH ST KIPLINGAVEPARK G L E N R D BELTLINEBL VD3 6 T H S T 3 6 1 /2 S TUTICAAVEWEBSTER AVEFRANCE AVEP A R K C E N T ERBLVD31ST ST CP RR 34TH ST WOOD D A L E AVE36TH ST HUNTINGTON AVEJOPPA AVEGLENHURST AVEXENWOOD AVELYNN AVELYNN AVEMON T E R E Y D R V A L L A C H E R A V ERALEIGH AVERALEIGH AVE35 TH ST P A R K C O M M O N S D R RANDAL L A V EMONTEREY AVE3 3 R D S T 33RD ST W O L F E PKW YYOSEMI TE AVE31ST ST GLENHURST AVETOLEDOAVESALEMAVELYNN AVEHUNTINGTON AVE37TH ST 31ST ST INGLEWOOD AVE3 5 T H S T Legend 0-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 5-6 6-7 7-8 8-9 Water Elevation 873.0 Water Elevation 874.0 100yr Flood Inundation "?B CB "?B CBMH $1 INLET [Ú LIFT STA ÍÎ/NODE gW OUTFALL 0 OUTLET STMH !(STMVL Storm Mains Property BoundariesÜ0500 1,000250 Feet The purpose of this figure is to outline storm sewer upstream of Bass Lake Preserve that is currently inundated with some level of surface water and what effects of raising the water level within the basin one foot to aid in managing the cattails within the wetland. The information shown on this figure is approximate and needs field verification of manhole inverts to determine accuracy. Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Page 48 3 6 T H S T Proposed pond and wetland mitigation area UVMP Area 1 cleared in spring 2015 Remove wooden skimmer structre and install new outlet control structure and skimmer Remove manhole that extends out of the ground Proposed flood protection project Proposed flood mitigation project ±200 0 200100 Feet Bass Lake Preserve Restoration Legend Upland Vegetation Management Area 1 Upland Vegetation Management Area 2 Upland Vegetation Management Area 3 Upland Vegetation Management Area 4 Upland Vegetation Management Area 5 Wetland Boundary Proposed Pond 100 Year Flood Elev (BFE 879) Existing Trail !(Existing Storm Structures Existing Storm Sewer Proposed Improvements Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Page 49 Carpenter ParkProposed UndergroundStormwater Management Facility !(!(!(!( !(!(!( !(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( CarpenterPark Project Location ")5 ")25 ¬«100 MINNETONKA BLVD MINNETONKA BLVD MINNETONKA BLV D BELTLINEBLVD31ST ST WTOLEDOAVES S E R V I C E D R H I G H WA Y 7 OTTAWAAVES31ST ST W SALEMAVESPRINCETONAVESRALEIGHAVESQUENTINAVESSALEMAVESRALEIGHAVESNBHWY100STOMINNETONKABLVDQUENTINAVESTOLEDOAVESLegend Proposed Storm Watershed Area !(Stromwater Feature Storm Mains Ü 0 100 20050 Feet Figure 1Location Map Watershed Area = 31.9 acres Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Page 50 Carpenter ParkProposed UndergroundStormwater Management Facility !( !( !(RALEIGH AVE So Install diversion manhole and connect storm sewer to underground facility Install diversion manhole and connect storm sewer to underground facility Remove Ash trees 24' Underground stormwater storage facility Install diversion manhole and connect storm sewer to underground facility Grade park area with cover storage facility with 8 inches of well draining material and install additional surface drains Finish grade elevation 882.00 (approx) D D Realign bitumionus trail Watermain Location approximate and needs to be field located Grade site and create slope to 6:1 with a minimim length 24 feet Proposed sanitary sewer Legend Proposed Storm Sewer !(Proposed Manhole Irrigation Area Existing Watermain Proposed Sanitary Stub Proposed Trail Stormwater Feature Watershed Area Water Mains Sanitary Mains Sanitary Manholes !(CB/CBMH #*Outfall [Ú Lift Station Storm Mains Ü 0 50 10025 Feet Figure 2Underground StormwaterFacility Location Green Space Irrigation Area = 3.75 acres Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Page 51 Phillip Elkin, City of St. Louis Park Charles Hathaway and Randy Duncan Bass Lake Preserve Project December 9, 2015 1 To: From: Subject: Date: Page: Technical Memorandum To: Phillip Elkin, City of St. Louis Park From: Charles Hathaway and Randy Duncan Subject: Bass Lake Preserve Project Date: December 9, 2015 Project: 23271435.00 1. Introduction In the past 6 months Barr Engineering has been working with the City of St. Louis Park in preparing an Environmental Assessment Worksheet to seek approval of a project which would allow the City to dredge the area and created large open water areas in the basin. Based on the additional research collected in preparing this document, we have concluded that the project could likely not go forward as originally planned, the project needs to be re‐imagined and focused on those improvements that can be accomplished within the permitted actions and are a cost‐effective impact on the waterbody. Bass Lake cannot be feasibly transformed into a deep lake or sustainably be maintained as a large open‐water pond, but improvements along the shoreline can facilitate the revitalization of this historic wetland and the enhancement of its ecological and recreational value. 2. Background and current situation The shallow waterbody known as Bass Lake, situated at the eastern edge of St. Louis Park, which has been identified by the City to be converted into a regional amenity. Despite having been known as a lake and regarded as such by local residents for many years, Bass Lake’s official status has recently (c. 2013) changed. After examining its current physical characteristics, the MPCA now has Bass Lake listed as a wetland, and not a lake. This change has little bearing on how it can or should be managed. The Bass Lake Preserve, which includes Bass Lake and the vegetated areas and trail system that surround it, has residential districts to its north, east, and south. Commercial, industrial, and residential properties border the preserve to the west and northeast. The Bass Lake Preserve performs several valuable functions. Receiving stormwater from a large, urban watershed (1,355 acres), it removes sediment and improves downstream water quality. The wetland and its vegetated fringe also provide important wildlife habitat. Several bird species— including songbirds, raptors, waterfowl, and egrets and heron—are known to inhabit or frequent the Preserve, and coyotes and small mammals make their homes along the wetland’s edge Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Page 52 Phillip Elkin, City of St. Louis Park Charles Hathaway and Randy Duncan Bass Lake Preserve Project December 9, 2015 2 To: From: Subject: Date: Page: Small fish and minnows reportedly live in the shallow waters, and the wetland itself is home to many species of reptiles, amphibians, and aquatic insects and invertebrates. The natural beauty and wildlife of the wetland area make the Preserve a recreational destination. A trail that encircles the wetland is frequented by individuals and families on a stroll, hikers, and joggers from the surrounding neighborhoods and businesses. Patients and staff of the adjacent Melrose Institute enjoy the tranquil setting provided by its proximity to the Preserve. Small open‐ water areas attract waterfowl and shorebirds—and those interested in viewing wildlife. 3. Previous discussions and studies The City’s interest in Bass Lake – both as a regional amenity and as a stormwater detention and treatment facility – goes back several decades. Barr has been involved with several studies in recent years in an effort to help the City understand the function and possibilities of the Preserve. These studies and discussions include: Stormwater Pond Evaluation and Prioritization (Barr, December 2011) – discussed Bass Lake in the context of the City’s overall stormwater management program. Recommended maintenance dredging and inlet rehabilitation at Bass Lake. St. Louis Park City Council Minutes, March 12, 2012 – detailed the discussion by City Council members of the value and preservation needs for Bass Lake after a staff report was presented; more proactive management and further study was encouraged. Storm Water Follow Up – Bass Lake Improvements (Michael Rardin; Discussion Item for St. Louis Park City Council, June 18, 2012) – provided information regarding possible improvements to Bass Lake. Improvement options including functional restoration, limited dredging to enlarge open water areas, and full dredging of the wetland. Suggested that functional restoration should be evaluated further, and that more extensive dredging would require retaining a consultant to conduct a more detailed study. St. Louis Park City Council Minutes, June 18, 2012 – noted that Michael Rardin presented the staff report indicating that functional restoration would be the preferred option; the Council directed staff to pursue this option. Project was not expected to begin until 2014 at the earliest. Technical Memo: Beltline LRT Station Project Area Coordinated Stormwater Management Analysis (Barr, August 2012) – discussed potential improvements to the City’s stormwater system in coordination with anticipated developments around the proposed SW Corridor light rail line. Suggested a series of improvements to the Bass Lake Preserve, including cleanup, dredging, vegetation management, and boardwalk construction. 4. Existing Conditions stormwater analysis As part of the Beltline Study, an hydrologic and hydraulic stormwater models were created to analyze the existing stormwater infrastructure within the project area to understand how the storm sewer system currently functions, estimate the 100‐year flood elevation in the Bass Lake Preserve, identify areas of potential localized flooding in the watershed, and evaluate the impact of existing BMPs on pollutant removal and the water quality of stormwater reaching the Bass Lake Preserve. This study went onto evaluate potential stormwater management practices to quantify the impact of various stormwater management scenarios on the flooding in the Beltline station project area and on the water quality discharging to the Bass Lake Preserve, and help develop Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Page 53 Phillip Elkin, City of St. Louis Park Charles Hathaway and Randy Duncan Bass Lake Preserve Project December 9, 2015 3 To: From: Subject: Date: Page: and prioritize a stormwater management approach for the Beltline station area. The water quality situation in Bass Lake is largely a reflection of the water quality of the stormwater inflows it has received. Much of the existing watershed is currently untreated so some water quality improvements might be accomplished by installing upstream treatment ponds and other best management practices (BMPs ‐ see recommendations in the August 2012 Barr Technical Memo, listed above). These improvements are desirable, but they are not likely to greatly improve the water quality situation in Bass Lake. And given the current water quality in Bass Lake, even large (e.g., 20 percent) reductions in phosphorus concentrations are not likely to result in water quality improvements that are perceptible to the general public. Contributing to the difficulty is the fact that phosphorus concentrations in the Bass Lake sediments are also likely to be high. Additionally, Bass Lake is a wetland with significant emergent plant growth and organic materials. Sediment and organic phosphorus regularly cycles into the water column, meaning that reductions in inflow phosphorus concentrations may be overcome by contributions from internal sources. 5. Difficulties with dredging, cattail removal, and water level increases at Bass Lake Since the Bass Lake Preserve project received funding and project planning began, many options for the Preserve have been considered. The planning for the improvements has incorporated many of the suggestions that have been received, but at least three are seen to be infeasible, including: A. Conducting large‐scale dredging to create additional depth, and to greatly expand the open‐water portions of the wetland. Open water has aesthetic appeal, and increasing the depth of the wetland to approximately 6 to 8 feet would be sufficient to prevent cattails from taking root. However, for many reasons (including the use of large and heavy equipment, difficult access, de‐watering difficulties, and materials hauling and disposal) dredging at the scale required to create significant deep‐water habitat would be prohibitively expensive. Contributing to the expense is the fact that particularly toward the western edge of the wetland, the sediments are contaminated with PAHs and metals, so would require special handling and disposal at a licensed solid waste landfill. This cost would probably have to be borne entirely by the City, because funding is not likely to come from outside sources such as federal or state environmental‐ cleanup grant programs. Furthermore, dredging of large portions of the wetland, even if the sediments were not contaminated, would likely not be permitted by the MDNR or the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). These agencies do not typically permit wetland dredging for aesthetic reasons alone, and are generally opposed to converting wetland types (e.g., the conversion of shallow wetlands to deep wetlands). Finally, even if significant open‐ water areas could be created through dredging, remaining phosphorus contamination in the sediments along with phosphorus contamination from the stormwater inflows would likely result in significant algal blooms throughout the warm‐weather season. The blooms would diminish the aesthetic benefit that the dredging sought to provide. Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Page 54 Phillip Elkin, City of St. Louis Park Charles Hathaway and Randy Duncan Bass Lake Preserve Project December 9, 2015 4 To: From: Subject: Date: Page: B. Large‐scale vegetation (cattail) removal. Cattails can be removed by various means (e.g., mechanical, chemical, burning, etc.) and removal of cattails would increase the open‐water portion of the wetland. Cattail removal on a large scale, however, would be expensive, and would have to be repeated annually to keep the cattails from simply growing back and reclaiming their territory. It would, therefore, require an ongoing maintenance effort and budget. In addition, large‐scale removal of aquatic vegetation would require consultation with and approval from the MDNR, who may not issue a permit for such a large‐scale endeavor. C. Increasing water levels. To facilitate cattail removal and to possibly increase open‐ water area in Bass Lake, it has been suggested that the City could raise the water level by manipulating the gates that control the water flow out from the wetland at its east end. Raising the water level would be possible, but would increase the likelihood of flooding at the apartment complex at the southwest corner of the wetland and at other low‐lying areas along the wetland. It is unlikely that the City would want to increase its liability for flood damage. In addition, cattail removal with or without the benefit of increased water level has its own difficulties, as explained above. 6. Concept for integrated improvement project at the Bass Lake Preserve Although some of the approaches to improving the Bass Lake Preserve are not feasible, an interrelated set of improvements can comprise a project approach that would greatly enhance the value of the Preserve as a regional amenity. An overall project for improving the Preserve should include: A. Upland and wetland fringe vegetation management – this work is ongoing, as noted above, and includes selective cutting and replanting to re‐establish native species and enhance wildlife habitat value. In association with the removal of debris and the upland vegetation management program, the wetland fringe (near‐shore portions of the wetland that are intermittently inundated) would be managed to remove cattails from select areas and replace them with higher‐value native aquatic plant species. This would be done to improve wildlife habitat, and to enhance the aesthetic experience of visitors walking along the paths at the Preserve. B. Maintenance dredging near wetland inlets and outlets – Sediment from stormwater inflows has accumulated in Bass Lake over time, and this sediment can be removed near the inlets to restore portions of the wetland to their original depths. The MDNR typically allows maintenance dredging to remove pond sediments accumulated as a result of stormwater inflows. By comparison to the difficulties that would be involved with permitting more extensive general dredging to increase water depths and create open water for aesthetic reasons, permitting for maintenance dredging is relatively straightforward and uncomplicated. This selective dredging would assist in improving water quality both within Bass Lake and for downstream receiving waters. Dredging would be conducted near all the storm Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Page 55 Phillip Elkin, City of St. Louis Park Charles Hathaway and Randy Duncan Bass Lake Preserve Project December 9, 2015 5 To: From: Subject: Date: Page: sewer inlets, but the areas at the west end of the wetland, where large volumes of stormwater are regularly received, would receive particular attention. Dredging would also occur near the outlet at the east end of the wetland to facilitate maintenance and in association with improvements to be made at that structure. Given this work would involve removal of some cattail mats and increasing the pond depth in the locations where dredging is needed, the maintenance dredging would have the adjunct benefit of increasing the open‐water area of the wetland and thereby improving the aesthetic experience for visitors to the Preserve. C. Pond development at the northeast corner of the Preserve – A small area of currently‐ undeveloped City‐owned land at the northeast corner of the Preserve can be excavated for use as a stormwater treatment forebay for stormwater coming from watersheds to the north. Developing this area as a stormwater pond would have several benefits, including improved Bass Lake water quality as a result of sediment sequestration in the pond, effectively increasing the viewable area of the Preserve for visitors, and providing additional open‐water area within the Preserve. Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Page 56 PREVIOUS DISCUSSIONS AND STUDIES The City’s interest in Bass Lake Preserve – both as a regional amenity and as a stormwater detention and treatment facility – goes back several decades. The City has conducted numerous studies and engaged in many discussions of Bass Lake Preserve over the years to evaluate various approaches for improving the wetland. These studies and discussions include: St. Louis Park Inter‐office Memorandum: Proposed Development Cost – Bass Lake Park (George Haun to Jim Miceli; December 5 1969) – listed costs totaling $138,500 for improvements (trails, vegetation, lighting, parking lot) at and around Bass Lake. Bass Lake Development Study (Eugene A Hickock & Associates, November 1970) – analyzed storm sewer retention needs and possibilities within the Bass Lake watershed, suggested various dredging and diking approaches to provide stormwater storage and enhance recreational value. Subsequent planning and a cost estimate for the work was prepared by Hickock & Associates in 1971. Grant Application for Bass Lake Park Development (City of St. Louis Park, May 1980, to the State Planning Agency) – proposed extensive cleanup along the shores of the wetland, grading and seeding of at the edges of the wetland, and the development of a limestone trail around the wetland. Request for Council Action (City of St. Louis Park Public Works Department, November 2, 1992) – requested funding ($90,000) for removal by dredging of silt build‐up resulting from storm sewer inflows, and widening the main channel through the wetland. Bass Lake Drainage System Study (OSM, December 1993) – analyzed stormwater inflows to Bass Lake and recommended stormwater pond development in several locations upstream of Bass Lake. St. Louis Park 2010 Pond Inventory (HIG, 2010) – provided historical (1937, 1957) photos of the Bass Lake wetland complex. Stormwater Pond Evaluation and Prioritization (Barr, December 2011) – discussed Bass Lake in the context of the City’s overall stormwater management program. Recommended maintenance dredging and inlet rehabilitation at Bass Lake. St. Louis Park City Council Minutes, March 12, 2012 – detailed the discussion by City Council members of the value and preservation needs for Bass Lake after a staff report was presented; more proactive management and further study was encouraged. Storm Water Follow Up – Bass Lake Improvements (Michael Rardin; Discussion Item for St. Louis Park City Council, June 18, 2012) – provided information regarding possible improvements to Bass Lake. Improvement options including functional restoration, limited dredging to enlarge open water areas, and full dredging of the wetland. Suggested that functional restoration should be evaluated further, and that more extensive dredging would require retaining a consultant to conduct a more detailed study. St. Louis Park City Council Minutes, June 18, 2012 – noted that Michael Rardin presented the staff report indicating that functional restoration would be the preferred option; the Council directed staff to pursue this option. Project was not expected to begin until 2014 at the earliest. Technical Memo: Beltline LRT Station Project Area Coordinated Stormwater Management Analysis (Barr, August 2012) – discussed potential improvements to the City’s stormwater system in coordination with anticipated developments around the proposed SW Corridor light rail line. Suggested a series of improvements to the Bass Lake Preserve, including cleanup, dredging, vegetation management, and boardwalk construction. Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Page 57 Bass Lake Preliminary Sediment Sampling Results (City of St. Louis Park, July 2014) – summarized the results of the analysis of sediment samples for poly‐aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Found that while PAH contamination was minimal at the east end of Bass Lake, contamination levels were considerably higher along the western shore of the wetland. As a result, dredged material from western portions of the pond is likely to need to be placed in a licensed solid waste landfill. Bass Lake Preliminary Sediment Sampling Results for Perfluorochemicals (City of St. Louis Park, July 2014) – summarized results of analysis of sampled sediments for perfluorochemicals. Found that for this contaminant, results were below the SRV value for industrial or industrial land uses. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (WSB, August 2014) – identified past activities in and around the wetland that have the potential to affect improvement projects at the Preserve. The report noted that filling and dumping has taken place along the western edge of the wetland, and identified adjacent commercial and industrial operations that may have had an impact on soil or water contamination in or adjacent to Bass Lake. Historical aerial photography and USGS mapping was examined. Floating Mat and Soft Sediment Investigation (WSB, August 2015) – provided results of an examination of the emergent cattail vegetation and soft sediments in Bass Lake. Found that the cattails were for the most part rooted, but that floating mats existed near the center and southern portions of the wetland. The study also showed that the sediments are primarily soft organic material – typical for a shallow wetland but giving little indication that significant fill has been placed in much of the wetland. Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Page 58 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT’S WORKFLOW TIMELINE FOR THE BASS LAKE PRESERVE RESTORATION PROJECT Outlined below are the completed and ongoing tasks, on a monthly basis, for Bass Lake Preserve beginning in the spring of 2014: April, 2014 Initial site inspection with new Engineering Staff to observe water levels, vegetation, wildlife, and Preserve user interaction May, 2014 Site inspection to observe water levels, vegetation, wildlife, and Preserve user interaction Collect water quality samples at the inlets (3) and outlet of the Preserve to determine influent and effluent Total Phosphorus, Ortho Phosphorus, Total Suspended Solids concentrations Analyze water quality sampling results o Pollutants concentrations were greater on the westerly side (inlet) of the Preserve than the easterly side (outlet) and contrary to anticipated results and indicated that the floating mat uptake of phosphorus is greater than expected and is providing some level of water quality improvement Discussion on Section 106 permitting, State Historical Preservation Office (SHPO) with Archeological consultant on anticipated permitting challenges and timelines Review Water Quality Study for the Beltline Transit Station for the Southwest Light Rail Transit Project o Study indicated several projects to be undertaken as part of the SWLRT project and estimated pollutant removals o Study determined that the minor projects identified would not make a significant difference and that further redevelopment in the area to make significant improvements Discussions with Great River Greening on Lessard Outdoor Heritage Grant Funding Develop project concepts of upland vegetation management, storm sewer improvements, in‐lake improvements Outline feasible improvements and define a concepts for each task June, 2014 Samples were collected monthly at the inlets (3) and outlet of the Preserve to determine influent and effluent Total Phosphorus, Ortho Phosphorus, Total Suspended Solids concentrations Initial site inspection with new Engineering Staff to observe water levels, vegetation, wildlife, and Preserve user interaction Develop concept plan to include excavation area, excavation volumes, and disposal of the contaminated sediment westerly side of the Preserve, excavation and onsite disposal of less contaminated easterly portion of the basin, implementation of a Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Page 59 Bass Lake Workflow Timeline 12/2015 2 boardwalk across the basin, and a native vegetation and pollinator establishment program Gather online historical information o Historical aerials photos o Historical maps o Historical articles and newspaper clippings Obtain historical information from St. Louis Park Historical Society o Historical aerials photos o Historical maps o Historical articles and newspaper clippings Discussions with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency on the Perfluorocarbons (PFC) and their sediment sampling requests Collect sediment samples to determine the concentrations of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon (PAH) within the main channel o Six sediment samples were collected to determine the level of PAH contamination within the channel and proper excavated material handling and disposal procedures Collect sediment samples to determine the concentrations of Perfluorocarbons (PFC) within the main channel o Three sediment samples were collected to determine the level of PFC contamination within the channel and proper excavated material handling and disposal procedures Measure water depths within the open channel areas o Measurement of water depths was needed to determine bottom of channel elevations within the basin and to develop a Bathometric map of the open water areas Develop a Bathometric map identifying water depths within the open water areas o Water depths range from 0.5 feet to 5 feet with an average depth of 2 feet Develop public meeting mailer, mailing map, and collect address project area o Meeting mailing was sent to 540 residents, was listed on the City’s website, and was posted on Facebook and Twitter July, 2014 Open house at City Hall to discuss the Bass Lake Preserve past, present, and potential future of the area and to gather input from the public, and gain support for the project o 22 residents attended the meeting Collect water quality samples at the inlets (3) and outlet of the Preserve to determine influent and effluent Total Phosphorus, Ortho Phosphorus, Total Suspended Solids concentrations Develop and solicit request for proposals for consultants to perform the following tasks Tree survey Wetland delineation Environmental Assessment (Phase I investigation) Site inspection to observe water levels, vegetation, wildlife, and Preserve user interaction Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Page 60 Bass Lake Workflow Timeline 12/2015 3 August, 2014 Hold discussions on local funding options from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for vegetation management and water quality improvements o Discussions include potential projects that could potentially receive funding Obtain historical information from Hennepin County Historical Museum Historical aerials photos Historical maps Historical articles and newspaper clippings o Collect property information of the area surrounding the Bass Lake Preserve area to determine property ownership, easements, access, and actual property boundaries o Hold meetings with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District on wetland classification, project feasibility of dredging of the Preserve, mitigation measures, regulatory compliance, and schedule o Perform survey of trees within the Preserve limits to determine number of trees within, about 1,700, determine species of trees and which trees are native, invasive, and considered desirable by City ordinance Survey also included detail on the overall health of the each tree, with a classification of 1‐5 based on percent of tree being alive or dead Significant trees, based on City ordinance were tagged in the field for future identification Task was completed in October 2014 o Collect water quality samples at the inlets (3) and outlet of the Preserve to determine influent and effluent Total Phosphorus, Ortho Phosphorus, Total Suspended Solids concentrations o Site inspection to observe water levels, vegetation, wildlife, and Preserve user interaction September, 2014 o Perform delineation of wetland within the Preserve limits and develop report to define the wetland classifications within the Preserve boundary Existing conditions of the Preserve are classified as the main portion if the basin is a Class 3 wetland, a shallow mash with typical depths of 2 to 4 feet and there are four other wetlands that are partially of the site, which are all considered Type 1 wetlands and seasonal inundated o Submit wetland delineation report to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, the Local Governing Unit (LGU) Delineation report was accepted by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District in 10/2014 o Meeting with Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for further discussion on project feasibility of dredging of the Preserve, mitigation measures, regulatory compliance, and schedule o Discussions with Brad Wozney, Board of Soil and Water Resources Director of the Clean Water Amendment Act funding source Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Page 61 Bass Lake Workflow Timeline 12/2015 4 Discussions include potential projects that could potentially receive funding o Completed plan identified a high potential for contamination and recommended a Phase II investigation to include additional field testing Develop and solicit request for proposals for consultants to perform topographic survey if the preserve o Collect water quality samples at the inlets (3) and outlet of the Preserve to determine influent and effluent Total Phosphorus, Ortho Phosphorus, Total Suspended Solids concentrations o Site inspection to observe water levels, vegetation, wildlife, and Preserve user interaction October, 2014 o Provide Council a detailed discuss on the project background, historical information, potential improvements, and anticipated schedule o Begin monthly internal meetings, on the third Wednesday of each month, with Environmental, Utilities, and Parks to discuss project progress and next steps o Hold Bass Lake Preserve Clean Up Event with local Girl Scout Troop Clean up day produced the removal over five bags of trash, marked trees, and learn about water quality and the environment o Articles run in the Sun Sailor on the following: Girl Scout Clean up Event Past, present, and potential future of the Bass Lake Preserve project o Hold meeting with regulatory agencies, BWSR, MCWD, DNR, ACOE (no‐show) to discuss project feasibility of dredging of the Preserve, mitigation measures, regulatory compliance, and schedule o Complete site topographic survey of Preserve including trails, storm sewer, bottom of channel elevations, top of sediment elevations, and visible property monuments o Site inspection to observe water levels, vegetation, wildlife, and Preserve user interaction November, 2014 o Refine concept plan to reduce dredging areas and volumes due to anticipated costs of contaminated sediments December, 2014 o Begin monthly meeting with the Friends of Bass Lake Preserve (FOBL) that occur on the second Monday of each month o Public meeting to discuss the Upland Vegetation Management Program and the implementation of the UVMP Area 1 Tree Clearing Project, 12 residents attended the meeting Meeting mailing was sent to 540 residents, was listed on the City’s website, and was posted on Facebook and Twitter Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Page 62 Bass Lake Workflow Timeline 12/2015 5 January, 2015 o Update classification of the Bass Lake Preserve from Lake to Wetland, by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, was completed due to the wetland delineation completed by the City o Develop plans and specifications for the Upland Vegetation Management Program to include the removal of approximately 250 trees o Identify selected trees within Upland Vegetation Management Program within Area 1 were marked for removal by Jim Vaughan and Erick Francis o Refine survey data to establish Ordinary High Water Level (OHW) of 872.5 around the basin Elevation determines which jurisdictional Agency has regulatory permitting authority, ACOE, BWSR, DNR, MCWD, MPCA, etc. February, 2015 o Submit Upland Vegetation Management Program to Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for Permitting for Upland Vegetation Management Program (UVMP), Areas 1‐3 o Hold meeting with Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to discuss permitting matrix, what permits will apply and why, timelines for application and approval for issuance, and project implementation timelines March, 2015 o Review Water Quality Improvement Report for Bass Lake Preserve, dated 1993 OSM and Associates Study identified 15 locations within the watershed that could provide water quality ponds Several of these projects have been implemented, specifically around Highway 100, others haven’t been implemented, likely due to property ownership and ability to reroute storm sewer to the proposed pond o Provide Council a detailed outline on the Upland Vegetation Management Program o Request for bids for the Upland Vegetation Management Program April, 2015 o Tree clearing in UVMP Area 1 began 275 trees were selected for removal from the westerly portion of the preserve, which consisted of invasive species, dead or hazard trees, to allow adequate access to existing infrastructure, and trees that are not considered Significant by City ordinance o Site inspection to observe water levels, vegetation, wildlife, and Preserve user interaction May, 2015 o Collect sediment samples to determine the concentrations of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon (PAH) from the floating mat Sampling efforts indicated that the Preserve has not filled with sediment but is really a floating mat of organic material Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Page 63 Bass Lake Workflow Timeline 12/2015 6 14 samples were collected to determine PAH contamination levels and proper excavated material handling and disposal procedures Results indicate that the floating mat has a very low level of PAH contamination and the excavated sediment can be used as fill material in residential or commercial applications o Arbor Day Celebration, which included over 50 attendees, a tree dedication by the Mayor, planting of over 80 trees on the westerly side of the Preserve, spreading of wood mulch, and trash pickup Meeting mailing was sent to 540 residents, was listed on the City’s website, and was posted on Facebook and Twitter o Develop agreement with Barr Engineering to create Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the Preserve Transfer gathered site data to Barr for Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) o Develop agreement with Great River Greening to create a Upland Vegetation Management Program for the preserve o Site inspection to observe water levels, vegetation, wildlife, and Preserve user interaction June, 2015 o Site inspection to observe water levels, vegetation, wildlife, and Preserve user interaction July, 2015 o Develop request for proposal for floating mat survey to determine thickness and depth of peat material August, 2015 o Complete survey on the floating mat within the basin Floating mat wasn’t floating as much as it was in May, due to fluctuations in water level Floating mat thickness ranged from 10 inches to 18 inches Depth of peat was greater than 8 feet in depth o Provide update on Upland Vegetation Management Program and discuss the finding of the floating mat Completed survey delineated floating matting within the wetland Survey defined thickness of floating matting Unable to define thickness of matting in non‐buoyant area, due to water levels, or to determine depth of peat soils, greater than eight feet Determined that matting becomes buoyant as water levels fluctuate o Review draft Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) o Review draft Upland Vegetation Management Program o Redefine concept plan to account for floating mat, which reduced excavation and disposal volumes and areas o Send public meeting mailer Meeting mailing was sent to 540 residents, was listed on the City’s website, and was posted on Facebook and Twitter Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Page 64 Bass Lake Workflow Timeline 12/2015 7 o Update Upland Vegetation Management Program permits with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to include Areas 4‐5 in anticipation of completing the Upland Vegetation Management Program all the way around the Preserve o Perform site inspection to observe water levels, vegetation, wildlife, and Preserve user interaction September, 2015 Hold public meeting to discuss the UVMP program, presented by Great River Greening, the draft Environmental Assessment Worksheet presented by Barr engineering, and anticipated implementation schedule o Meeting mailing was sent to 540 residents, was listed on the City’s website, and was posted on Facebook and Twitter o Presented findings for draft EAW Hold monthly internal meetings, on the third Wednesday of each month, with Environmental, Utilities, and Parks to discuss project progress and next steps* Hold monthly meeting with the Friends of Bass Lake Preserve (FOBL) that occur on the second Tuesday of each month* October, 2015 Develop request for bids for the mowing of the emergent vegetation in the Upland Vegetation Management Program Begin Upland Vegetation Management Program plans and specification for the remaining areas around the Preserve Site inspection to observe water levels, vegetation, wildlife, and Preserve user interaction November, 2015 Complete mowing of emergent vegetation in UVMP Area 1 o Mowing of Area 1 consisted of cutting and clearing of vegetation that emerged over the summer months, while the UVMP was being developed and reviewed by the public December, 2015 Continue to develop Upland Vegetation Management Program plans and specification for the remaining areas around the Preserve The friends of Bass Lake are suggesting the City is required to treat upstream stormwater to a level that Special Study Session Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on Bass Lake Preserve Improvements Page 65 Meeting: Economic Development Authority Meeting Date: April 4, 2016 Consent Agenda Item: 5a EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Approval of EDA Disbursements RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to accept for filing EDA Disbursement Claims for the period of January 23 through March 25, 2016. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the EDA desire to approve EDA disbursements in accordance with Article V – Administration of Finances, of the EDA Bylaws? SUMMARY: The Accounting Division prepares this report on a monthly basis for the EDA to review and approve. The attached reports show both EDA disbursements paid by physical check and those by wire transfer or Automated Clearing House (ACH) when applicable. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Review and approval of the information follows the EDA’s Bylaws and provides another layer of oversight to further ensure fiscal stewardship. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: EDA Disbursements Prepared by: Connie Neubeck, Account Clerk Reviewed by: Steven Heintz, Interim Controller 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:47:22R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 1Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 106,408.93ADAGIO LLC HOIGAARD VILLAGE DEVELOPER TAX INCREMNT PYMT 106,408.93 75,374.47AQUILA SENIOR LLC AQUILA COMMONS G & A DEVELOPER TAX INCREMNT PYMT 75,374.47 57,350.25BELT LINE PROPERTIES INC WOLFE LAKE COMMERCIAL TIF G&A DEVELOPER TAX INCREMNT PYMT 57,350.25 450.00BOND TRUST SERVICES CORP HOIGAARD 2010A DEBT SERV G&A FISCAL AGENT FEES 450.00 198.00CAMPBELL KNUTSON PROF ASSOC DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A LEGAL SERVICES 41.25HWY 7 & LOUISIANA LEGAL SERVICES 379.50PARK COMMONS G&A LEGAL SERVICES 618.75 510.00CITIZENS INDEPENDENT BANK DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A TRAINING 840.00DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 1,350.00 23,857.42DMD PROPERTIES LLC MCGARVEY COFFEE SITE NOTES PAYABLE-CURRENT PORTION 21,142.58MCGARVEY COFFEE SITE INTEREST/FINANCE CHARGES 45,000.00 49,666.14DUKE REALTY WEST END TIF DIST G&A DEVELOPER TAX INCREMNT PYMT 49,666.14 239.85ECM PUBLISHERS INC DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A LEGAL NOTICES 239.85 27,887.61EDGEWOOD INVESTORS LLC EDGEWOOD TIF DIST G & A DEVELOPER TAX INCREMNT PYMT 27,887.61 107.50EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC SWLRT DEVELOPMENT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 893.38WEST END TIF DIST G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 570.88ELLIPSE ON EXC TIF DIST G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 570.88CSM TIF DIST G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 8,262.50DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 570.88MILL CITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 570.88PARK COMMONS G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES Economic Development Authority Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approval of EDA Disbursements Page 2 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:47:22R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 2Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 570.88EDGEWOOD TIF DIST G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 570.88ELMWOOD VILLAGE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 570.88WOLFE LAKE COMMERCIAL TIF G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 570.83AQUILA COMMONS G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 570.88HWY 7 BUSINESS CENTER G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 14,401.25 59,060.19ELLIPSE II LLC ELLIPSE II G&A DEVELOPER TAX INCREMNT PYMT 59,060.19 153,003.74ELLIPSE ON EXCELSIOR LLC ELLIPSE ON EXC TIF DIST G&A DEVELOPER TAX INCREMNT PYMT 153,003.74 338,391.76EXCELSIOR & GRAND LLC PARK COMMONS G&A DEVELOPER TAX INCREMNT PYMT 338,391.76 249.00FINANCE & COMMERCE DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 249.00 10,000.00FRANZEN LAW & POLICY GROUP LLC HRA LEVY G&A LEGAL SERVICES 10,000.00 505,843.28GOTTMAR LLC PARK COMMONS G&A DEVELOPER TAX INCREMNT PYMT 505,843.28 563.24HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER HARD COAT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 532.12ELIOT PARK TIF DIST G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,414.54WEST END TIF DIST G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,256.57ELLIPSE ON EXC TIF DIST G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 732.34PARK CENTER HOUSING G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,478.79CSM TIF DIST G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6,403.25PARK COMMONS G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 624.09EDGEWOOD TIF DIST G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,205.60ELMWOOD VILLAGE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 728.04WOLFE LAKE COMMERCIAL TIF G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,136.21AQUILA COMMONS G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 770.52HWY 7 BUSINESS CENTER G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 21,845.31 69,784.99HIGHWAY 7 BUSINESS CENTER LLC HWY 7 BUSINESS CENTER G & A DEVELOPER TAX INCREMNT PYMT 69,784.99 Economic Development Authority Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approval of EDA Disbursements Page 3 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:47:22R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 3Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 1,790.40HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP INC DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A PLANNING 1,790.40 187.00KENNEDY & GRAVEN STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 396.00WEST END TIF DIST G&A LEGAL SERVICES 2,327.23DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A LEGAL SERVICES 126.00PARK COMMONS G&A LEGAL SERVICES 998.00HOIGAARD VILLAGE LEGAL SERVICES 1,125.00HARD COAT G & A LEGAL SERVICES 5,159.23 17.50LHB ENGINEERS & ARCHITECTS LOUISIANA LRT STATION OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,643.48ELLIPSE II G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,968.00DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 83.00HARD COAT G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,711.98 6,000.00LOCKRIDGE GRINDAL NAUEN PLLP DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A LEGAL SERVICES 6,000.00 5,000.00MCCDDEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,000.00 17,513.29MEDLEY ROW LLC HOIGAARD VILLAGE DEVELOPER TAX INCREMNT PYMT 17,513.29 81,675.10METRO TRANSIT COMMISSION DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 81,675.10 36.23OFFICE DEPOT DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A OFFICE SUPPLIES 36.23 237,142.00OLYMPUS VENTURES LLC HOIGAARD 2010A DEBT SERV G&A BOND PRINCIPAL 23,026.76HOIGAARD 2010A DEBT SERV G&A BOND INTEREST 260,168.76 1,851.28SEHHWY 7 & LOUISIANA SURVEYING 1,851.28 141,130.59SH ST LOUIS PARK HOTEL PROPCO LLC CSM TIF DIST G&A DEVELOPER TAX INCREMNT PYMT Economic Development Authority Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approval of EDA Disbursements Page 4 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:47:22R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 4Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 141,130.59 207,079.49SIDAL REALTY CO LTD PARTNERSHIP LLLP MILL CITY G&A DEVELOPER TAX INCREMNT PYMT 207,079.49 91,292.15ST LOUIS PARK CONV & VISITORS BUREAU CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU COST REIMBURSEMENT-CVB 91,292.15 100.00ST LOUIS PARK SUNRISE ROTARY DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 100.00 947,748.57THE SHOREHAM-BADER GRANTS SOIL REMEDIATION 947,748.57 38,978.04TP ST LOUIS PARK HOTEL PROPCO LLC CSM TIF DIST G&A DEVELOPER TAX INCREMNT PYMT 38,978.04 125,732.91WOODDALE CATERED LIVING OWNER LP WOODDALE POINTE DEVELOPER TAX INCREMNT PYMT 125,732.91 Report Totals 3,471,893.54 Economic Development Authority Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approval of EDA Disbursements Page 5 Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 4, 2016 Presentation: 2a EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: 2nd Annual SLP Earth Day Proclamation RECOMMENDED ACTION: The Mayor is asked to read and present the proclamation to Julie Rappaport of SEEDS. POLICY CONSIDERATION: None at this time. BACKGROUND: SLP SEEDS, a nonprofit organization supporting wellness and resiliency in St. Louis Park, joins with the Environment and Sustainability Commission: Sustainable SLP to host the 2nd Annual SLP Earth Day Celebration on April 24th, 2016 at Lenox Community Center. All citizens in our community are invited to join the free community dinner and town visioning forum. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a leader in environmental stewardship. We will increase environmental consciousness and responsibility in all areas of city business. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Proclamation Prepared by: Debbie Fischer, Administrative Services Office Assistant Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 2a ) Page 2 Title: 2nd Annual SLP Earth Day Proclamation PROCLAMATION 2nd Annual SLP Earth Day Community Dinner & Town Visioning Forum WHEREAS, SLP SEEDS, a nonprofit organization supporting wellness and resiliency in St. Louis Park, joins with the Environment and Sustainability Commission: Sustainable SLP to host the 2nd Annual SLP Earth Day Celebration on April 24th, 2016 at Lenox Community Center; and WHEREAS, Community Dinners provide a gathering for citizens of all ages and across cultures coming to the table to discuss concerns, wishes and recommendations from the general public to city and district officials and administration; and WHEREAS, Community Forums provide a place to envision the future and voice goals; and WHEREAS, SLP SEEDS and the Environment and Sustainability Commission: Sustainable SLP actively challenge and support individuals, businesses, schools and community organizations to pledge to increasing efforts and actions of sustainable and wellness practices and policies; and WHEREAS, SLP SEEDS and the Environment and Sustainability Commission: Sustainable SLP actively involve the St. Louis Park High School Roots and Shoots Environmental Club youth on their boards, and as interns, providing work experience, community service hours, vocational skills, and engaging youth in making a difference in their communities and preparing our next generation of environmentally responsible leaders; and NOW THEREFORE, let it be known that the Mayor and City Council of the City of St. Louis Park do hereby proclaim April 24th, 2016, to be the 2nd Annual SLP Earth Day and call upon all citizens in our Community to join the free community dinner and town forum visioning; and LET IT FURTHER BE KNOWN that SLP SEEDS and the Environment and Sustainability Commission: Sustainable SLP support the efforts and actions of wellness and resiliency initiatives for our community culminating in an action task list for the years ahead. WHEREFORE, I set my hand and cause the Great Seal of the City of St. Louis Park to be affixed this 4th day of April, 2016. _________________________________ Jake Spano, Mayor Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 4, 2016 Presentation: 2b EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Presentation Accepting Monetary Donation from Rotary Club of St. Louis Park for the Summer Concert Series ($1,300) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Lisa Abernathy, Recreation Supervisor, will be present to accept a donation in the amount of $1,300. Greg Palmer, Paul Bierhaus and Shady Taha, members of the Rotary Club of St. Louis Park, will be in attendance to present the check for the summer concert series. The donation will be officially accepted by the City Council as a consent item following the presentation. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish to accept the gift with restrictions on its use? SUMMARY: State statute requires City Council’s acceptance of donations. This requirement is necessary in order to make sure the City Council has knowledge of any restrictions placed on th e use of each donation prior to it being expended. The Rotary Club of St. Louis Park is graciously donating an amount of $1,300. The donation is given with the restriction that it be used toward the Recreation Division’s Summer Concert Series. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The Rotary Club of St. Louis Park accepted donations at the Bundled Up, Winter Fun Day event held on January 30, 2016. The donations received are provided to support the Recreation Division’s Summer Concert Series. The Concert Series is budgeted in the Organized Recreation budget. VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged community. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: None Prepared by: Stacy M. Voelker, Senior Office Assistant Reviewed by: Cindy Walsh, Director of Operations & Recreation Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 4, 2016 Presentation: 2c EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Recognition of Donations RECOMMENDED ACTION: Mayor to announce and express thanks and appreciation for the following donations being accepted at the meeting and listed on the Consent Agenda: From Amount For MN Society of Arboriculture $2,500 All related expenses for Jim Vaughan, Natural Resources Coordinator, to attend the 2016 International Society of Arboriculture Conference in Fort Worth, Texas Prepared by: Debbie Fischer, Administrative Services Office Assistant Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 4, 2016 Presentation: 2d EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Proclamation – National Service Recognition Day RECOMMENDED ACTION: The Mayor is asked to read the attached proclamation. POLICY CONSIDERATION: None at this time. SUMMARY: The fourth annual Mayors Day of Recognition for National Service will take place on Tuesday, April 5, 2016. The goal is to highlight the impact of AmeriCorps, Senior Corps, and other national service programs in tackling local problems and managing volunteers for greater impact, and to thank national service members for their commitment. Participating in the day will highlight the importance of citizen service, bolster support for nonprofit and national service groups, and help bring more city residents into service. There are five AmeriCorps members serving with the Minnesota Reading Corps and/or Minnesota Math Corps programs at schools in St. Louis Park. These Reading Corps and Math Corps members have committed to a year of service and are making a difference in the lives of the students they are serving by improving their literacy and math skills. The National Service Recognition Day initiative is led by the Corporation for National and Community Service, in partnership with the National League of Cities, the National Association of Counties, and Cities of Service. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged community. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Proclamation Prepared by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 2d) Page 2 Title: Proclamation – National Service Recognition Day PROCLAMATION National Service Recognition Day WHEREAS, service to others is a hallmark of the American character, and central to how we meet our challenges; and WHEREAS, the nation’s cities are increasingly turning to national service and volunteerism as a cost-effective strategy to meet their needs; and WHEREAS, AmeriCorps and Senior Corps participants address the most pressing challenges facing our communities, from educating students for the jobs of the 21st century and supporting veterans and military families to providing health services and helping communities recover from natural disasters; and WHEREAS, national service expands economic opportunity by creating more sustainable, resilient communities and providing education, career skills, and leadership abilities for those who serve; and WHEREAS, AmeriCorps and Senior Corps participants serve in more than 50,000 locations across the country, bolstering the civic, neighborhood, and faith-based organizations that are so vital to our economic and social well-being; and WHEREAS, national service participants increase the impact of the organizations they serve, both through their direct service and by managing millions of additional volunteers; and WHEREAS, national service represents a unique public-private partnership that invests in community solutions and leverages non-federal resources to strengthen community impact and increase the return on taxpayer dollars; and WHEREAS, national service participants demonstrate commitment, dedication, and patriotism by making an intensive commitment to service, a commitment that remains with them in their future endeavors; and WHEREAS, the Corporation for National and Community Service shares a priority with county officials and mayors nationwide to engage citizens, improve lives, and strengthen communities; and is joining with the National League of Cities, National Association of Counties, Cities of Service, and mayors and county officials across the country for the Mayor and County Recognition Day for National Service on April 5, 2016. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Council for the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota do hereby proclaim April 5, 2016, as National Service Recognition Day, and encourage residents to recognize the positive impact of national service in our county; to thank those who serve; and to find ways to give back to their communities. WHEREFORE, I set my hand and cause the Great Seal of the City of St. Louis Park to be affixed this 4th day of April, 2016. _________________________________ Jake Spano, Mayor Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 4, 2016 Minutes: 3a UNOFFICIAL MINUTES SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA FEBRUARY 29, 2016 1. Call to Order Mayor Spano called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Councilmembers present: Mayor Jake Spano, Tim Brausen, Steve Hallfin, Gregg Lindberg, Anne Mavity, and Thom Miller. Councilmember absent: Susan Sanger. Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), Director of Operations and Recreation (Ms. Walsh), Senior Engineering Project Manager (Mr. Sullivan), City Attorney (Mr. Mattick), Rec Center Manager (Mr. Eisold), Project Engineer (Mr. Wiesen), Communications Specialist (Ms. Pribbenow), and Recording Secretary (Ms. Batra). Guests: None 1a. Pledge of Allegiance 1b. Roll Call 2. Resolutions, Ordinances, Motions and Discussion Items 2a. Outdoor Recreation Facility Project Ms. Walsh explained that the Outdoor Recreation Facility is a unique facility and there are no others like it in the country. The facility is architecturally significant and a lot of thought has been put into the design. Hockey and skating programs will use the facility during the winter, and turf will be installed for activities during the spring and summer. There are many opportunities for the City to utilize the space, including community activities, sports, and other events. The concept for an outdoor ice facility originated from the Hockey Association, and they have contributed $1.95 million to the project. Over time the project has changed and evolved into much more than an ice rink. Ms. Walsh noted that three of the recommended actions relate to the specific bid packages for this project. The fourth action is to amend the agreement with the Hockey Association as the Board has elected to commit another $400,000 to complete the project. Councilmember Brausen asked if the facility would be wired for sound and video. Mr. Eisold stated that the facility will have a PA system, but nothing is planned from a video perspective at this time. City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 3a) Page 2 Title: Special City Council Meeting Minutes of February 29, 2016 Councilmember Mavity asked for clarification regarding the PA system and questioned what type of system is budgeted for the project. Ms. Walsh explained that the City will be supplying a microphone for events such as speaker presentations. Councilmember Mavity questioned how often the roof would need to be replaced and whether or not the City had insurance for replacement or repair of the roof in the event weather-related damage occurred. Ms. Walsh responded that the roof would be expected to last 20 to 25 years and would be insured in a manner similar to that of other City facilities. Blois Olson, 1801 Flag Avenue, stated there have been a lot of discussions in the community about this facility. He suggested that the Council take a step back and look at the facility in a different way to see the endless possibilities this facility could bring to the City as a community asset. He believed this facility would be an opportunity to draw the community together beyond the use by the Hockey Association during the winter months. Susan Johnson, 3112 Idaho Avenue South, stated that St. Louis Park and Hopkins have a combined girls’ hockey team that would greatly benefit from the Outdoor Recreation Facility. Nicole Epp, 1667 Virginia Avenue, stated she has three daughters and two play hockey and lacrosse. She believes that the girls get many positive qualities and experiences from sports and deserve a nice facility in the community to practice and play on. Councilmember Spano clarified that the total amount of the contracts to be awarded as a part of the first recommended action was $6,604,512. Greg Meyer, 3036 Rhode Island Avenue, stated he represents the Hockey Association and the Baseball Association and felt having an outdoor facility with ice and turf could be really beneficial for both programs. Chris Bixby, 720 W. Lake Street, stated that he is the St. Louis Park High School Lacrosse coach and represents the boys and girls in the program. He discussed trying to grow the sport in the community and overcoming the challenges associated with access and affordability. He stated currently there are no indoor facilities in the City for lacrosse during the off-season and the proposed facility would be great for the community. He added that he wants to build the program and excitement for the sport in St. Louis Park. It was moved by Councilmember Brausen, seconded by Councilmember Lindberg, to designate 19 different contractors as the lowest responsible bidders, as identified in the attached staff report, and authorize execution of contracts with those firms for the Outdoor Recreation Facility - Project No. 24145019. The total value of the contracts is $6,604,512 to approve a bid alternate to bid package #1 of the indoor refrigeration contract in the amount of $608,000 to include floor, piping and equipment for the outdoor facility; to approve a contract with RJM Construction in the amount of $562,821 for construction management, on-site supervision, and insurance; and to approve amendment to the financial agreement with the St. Louis Park Hockey Association for the outdoor recreation facility project increasing their contribution by $400,000 to a total $1.95 million. City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 3a) Page 3 Title: Special City Council Meeting Minutes of February 29, 2016 Councilmember Brausen thanked the community for sharing their collective thoughts in a constructive manner, because that made this decision easier. He discussed the reasons this project benefits the community and is an investment for the City. He explained everyone in the community would have an opportunity to use the facility to meet, recreate, and participate in a variety of activities. He recognized the contributions of the Hockey Association and their commitment to the project and a continued partnership with the City. He challenged citizens to come forward and ask to use the facility because it will be a community space. He also challenged staff to provide priority and opportunities to females and diverse cultural groups that want to use the space. Councilmember Lindberg stated this vote tonight is very important to him because the issue has taken a lot of energy and time from staff’s perspective and has involved an incredible public process. When this project was first discussed, Councilmember Lindberg explained, he was a skeptic; however, he has been proven wrong through data and feedback from the community. He now sees the facility as a unique community gathering space. In addition, this facility provides the City with a competitive advantage to recreate in the community. He stated he is very confident that staff will make this facility a great success and provide diverse opportunities for the community. Councilmember Miller stated that he is in favor of this project because, in his opinion, this facility is a perfect public/private project. He explained that he is concerned about the increased costs, so he is not going to support the project. He stated that he hopes the Council will reflect back on this issue in the future when considering funding for other projects as this money could have a lot of other uses that would benefit many other groups and activities in the City. Councilmember Mavity stated she has received a lot of feedback from residents about this project. She explained she had been supportive of the project because she felt it was a very unique opportunity for a public/private partnership with the Hockey Association. She stated she does not support the project at this time due to the increased costs and the fact that she does not feel that the public process has been very dynamic over the past couple of weeks. She explained almost five years ago the Council asked the community what their vision was for St. Louis Park and the creation of a civic center where the community could gather was discussed and a lot of time was spent on planning that idea. She stated that public process was extraordinarily robust, however, the outdoor facility is not the vision that resulted out of that process. Originally she supported the project, but she does not support it any longer due to the escalation of cost. Councilmember Mavity stated that she appreciates that the community is attempting to grow the sport of hockey and increase diversity. However, there are no kids of color in hockey at the high school, so she is not sure if they are really represented in the community. She stated that the City should be investing in projects and resources that appeal and benefit to the entire community. One of her key takeaways from this process is that the City wants to keep families in St. Louis Park, and people are willing to pay for high quality resources, so maybe the project should be reassessed to reconsider the civic center vision. She noted if the facility does get approved, she wants to ensure that the project is done correctly, which includes the City evaluating the programming at the facility to address equity and accessibility to ensure that it will benefit as many people in the community as possible. City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 3a) Page 4 Title: Special City Council Meeting Minutes of February 29, 2016 Councilmember Hallfin stated he will be supporting the project, which was a difficult decision due to the cost. He explained that although the project is over the estimated cost, the civic center project would have cost even more, and the length of time this facility will be used by the community softens the blow. Regarding the gender and race equity issue, he stated that the facility will increase equity for both gender and race as there will be more opportunity and more space to be used. Councilmember Lindberg explained that he participated as a resident in the group that discussed the civic center idea and was elected to the Council thereafter. He stated that this project was presented to the City as an opportunity because of some creative planning from individuals, including the Hockey Association. The City has a partner contributing $2 million, with a $6 million capital investment, to make this project happen. He stated that community does desire recreation space and gathering space, and the community also values these concepts. He suggested the City continue to look at sponsorship or other creative opportunities to finance this project and have additional conversations about practicality. Mayor Spano stated his support of the project. He explained that this decision has been difficult due to the cost. He noted the Friends of the Arts program is thrilled at the prospect of using the facility for theater based programming. He referenced a study conducted by USA Hockey about the increased participation and diversity in hockey in the state. In his own experience, Mayor Spano explained that the faces in hockey are increasingly diverse, with many being female. He stated that associations work as a pipeline in that decisions made a long time ago have a negative impact. The trends now, however, are leading towards diversity. In addition, Mayor Spano explained that more access equals more opportunity, and how that opportunity is guided is up to the Hockey Association and the City. Mayor Spano explained that he was reading the book Falling Water by Frank Lloyd Wright to highlight the city’s need to keep focused on future benefits of The Rec Center. Mayor Spano stated easy things are for other cities. St. Louis Park does tough things because decisions are made based on long-term best interest. The Park Association doesn’t turn any child away for hockey, and if the Park Association accepted the challenge, the City should as well. The motion passed 4-2. (Councilmember Mavity and Councilmember Miller opposed and Councilmember Sanger absent.) 3. Public Hearings Councilmember Brausen left at 7:53 p.m. after noting that he supports the sidewalk plan as proposed. 3a. 2016 Pavement Management and Connect the Park! Construction Project Mr. Sullivan presented the staff report regarding the 2016 Pavement Management and Connect the Park! Construction Project. He explained that this year the City is wrapping the Connect the Park! Sidewalk and Trail Plan into the Pavement Management Plan. City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 3a) Page 5 Title: Special City Council Meeting Minutes of February 29, 2016 Mr. Sullivan reviewed the project highlights, noting that asphalt replacement is the primary goal of the plan. Random curb and gutter replacement will be evaluated, in addition to selected watermain and service replacements, roadway narrowing and sidewalk construction. Mr. Sullivan discussed several project modifications, including reduction in tree impacts from watermain construction, roadway narrowing to minimize sidewalk impacts on streets with curb removal, and continuity of sidewalk on 34th Street across the Minnehaha Creek. Mr. Sullivan provided an overview of the Pavement Management and Connect the Park! Programs. He explained the infrastructure analysis that takes place and the sidewalk design considerations used to evaluate what needs to be replaced and where. He stated the City anticipates receiving bids at the end of March, awarding a bid in April, and constructing the project May through November. Mayor Spano opened public hearing. Carol Berger, 8211 34th Street West, stated she has been a resident since 1972. She stated that the public meetings were nice, but meant absolutely nothing as she believed the City didn’t want her opinion. She stated 34th Street is a school bus route and in her opinion, narrowing will be a hazard and not beneficial. Mr. Wiesen stated that the only concern of the school transportation company was related to plowing and since other streets in the City are the same width, this one won’t be a problem. Councilmember Lindberg asked if the average width of a street is between 28 and 30 feet. Mr. Sullivan confirmed that it is the average, noting some streets in the City are even narrower. He explained that there is a transition to narrower streets because streets are difficult to maintain and there are many benefits to reducing the size. Sherry Amelse, 8215 34th Street West, stated she understands that the Council has to make difficult decisions and does appreciate their work. She explained that many residents rely on street parking and some folks have no driveway or garage. She’s concerned that the narrowing will lower the availability. In addition, she said that narrowing the streets will cause traffic issues, especially the hill on 34th and Wyoming due to poor visibility. Councilmember Lindberg asked a clarifying question regarding parking restrictions on 34th Street and traffic calming. Mr. Wiesen explained there are no proposed changes to on-street parking as 28 feet is the minimum width for parking on both sides. Bill Magdziarz-Rainey, 8610 34th Street West, stated he believed the project was already decided before the public hearing was held. He stated there is always a cost and noted that Councilmember Lindberg was the only Councilmember at the public meeting. Dalles Bahe, 3355 Utah Avenue South, stated he had circulated a petition to stop the portion of the project for sidewalks and narrowing the street. He submitted the petition to Mayor Spano. He explained the reasons why he opposes narrowing the street, stating that it is safer to walk on the roadway rather than the sidewalks during winter and felt sidewalk maintenance would be an additional cost for the City. In his opinion, the money could be better spent to improve the sidewalks already in the neighborhood. City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 3a) Page 6 Title: Special City Council Meeting Minutes of February 29, 2016 Lisa Welke, 9100 Minnehaha Court, has lived at her residence for 16 years. She explained that she has three trees impacted by this plan. She lives on a corner and removing those three trees would greatly impact her privacy. In addition, she would lose 10 feet of property. She stated that the proposed sidewalk in front of her house does not lead to anywhere. She explained she has seen the City’s work along Walker Street and is not excited about how it looks, namely the drainage grates. She asked the Council to remove the section on her property from the plan. Councilmember Lindberg asked staff to determine what products were used on Walker Street and verify whether they will also be used in this present case. Mr. Sullivan stated the Walker Street project is still under construction. He explained that he will specifically investigate the pedestrian curb drops and the catch basins for erosion control. Mary Morin, 3223 Aquila Lane, stated that Aquila Lane contains nine homes affected by the sidewalk switching from the east to the west side of the street. She explained her main concern is the loss of ten feet of land as her property is small. She stated that the Three Rivers Trail is right behind her property so, in her opinion, this sidewalk is redundant. She proposed that the process be extended so there is more room for public input. Susan Erickson, 4122 Salem Avenue, offered an alternative vision because her neighborhood went through this scenario. In spite of the difficulty, she has had a tremendous experience and thanked the Council for the Connect the Park! Plan. She felt the sidewalk has reunited the community as sidewalks are like the circulatory system, which enables the community to connect. Mary Karius, 3440 Sunset Ridge Road, stated her daughter walks on snow banks to get home safely from the bus stop. She explained that she will gladly pay more if it means that her daughter will have a sidewalk to walk on to keep her safe. Rachel Harris, 2821 Texas Avenue South, stated that Aquila Park is her virtual community center. She stated that this is a plan for now and a plan for the future. When speaking about biking and walking, she requested that Council think of it as inclusive transportation. Ms. Harris stated she supports the proposal and would like the sidewalks to be the trail through the City. In addition, she appreciates that the City will plow and maintain the sidewalks. Mary Kramer, 8107 34th Street West, asked if anyone came to look at the street. She stated that she supports the Connect the Park! Plan but doesn’t think that these sidewalks make sense as it doesn’t connect to anything. Vern Stephen, Texas Avenue and 34th Street, stated he has lived at his residence since 1955 and feels that the sidewalk is not needed as no one has ever been killed there. Janis Klausing, 9025 34th Street West, stated that she is opposed to the sidewalk. She expressed concern that the sidewalk would increase drainage into Minnehaha Creek. In addition, residents still walk on the street when there are sidewalks on both sides. She requested that the City leave small neighborhoods alone and suggested the City instead discuss alternatives, such as a pedestrian bikeway. City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 3a) Page 7 Title: Special City Council Meeting Minutes of February 29, 2016 Councilmember Lindberg asked staff to discuss the public right-of-way and boulevards and specific impacts on storm water. Mr. Sullivan explained that sustainability is a goal of the Council and storm water runoff is a sustainability issue. There is a three-foot reduction in surface area; therefore, a smaller storm runoff. Councilmember Miller clarified that a good portion of the storm water is running off into the boulevard. Pat Sikes, 9015 34th Street West, stated that she doesn’t understand where the Connect the Park! Plan initiative originated. Mayor Spano explained that process. Ms. Sikes asked about the petition and if all residents didn’t want the sidewalks whether it would go forward. Mayor Spano explained that is not how the process works. Councilmember Mavity explained that sidewalks are a community amenity. Councilmember Lindberg explained that, in his opinion, the public process was good. He stated that he tried to balance, address, and hear all feedback. Connie Iacono, 8900 34th Street West, stated that she walks every day with her dog. She explained that she’s tried to walk on sidewalks, but they’re never clear in the winter. She stated she fell five years ago on the sidewalk and that the streets are safer in winter. In addition, when salt is added to the sidewalk, chemicals will drain into the Creek. Cynthia Jones-Klausing, 9025 34th Street West, stated that the overwhelming majority do not want the sidewalks and yet nothing gets changed. Her neighborhood is not a place you drive through to get somewhere. She explained that her neighbors do socialize and know each other. She requested the Council listen to her feedback and challenged the Council to walk her neighborhood to determine whether the sidewalks are in the residents’ best interest. Dalles Bahe, 3355 Utah Avenue South, reviewed the number of signatures on the petition he had presented to the Council. Bill Magdziarz-Rainey, 8610 34th Street West, stated that part of the sidewalk doesn’t make sense in his opinion. He stated that he drives a school bus and felt there would be a safety issue if there is parking on both sides. Councilmember Lindberg requested that staff clarify the plan for street width at Texas and 33rd and 34th Streets, to address some of the concerns specifically for right hand turns and larger vehicles. Mr. Wiesen explained that there is 200-foot section of that intersection that is going to remain at 36 feet wide and will not be reduced to allow turns. In addition, staff had conversations with emergency services and determined 28-feet is sufficient for parking on both sides. Carol Berger, 8211 34th Street West, stated that the City did a great job when updating 36th Street and the street was not narrowed. She doesn’t understand why that option is not available. She explained that she is upset because the City did not want to listen to her opinion on the matter. Mary Karius, 3440 Sunset Ridge Road, stated it is important to remember that people only show up when they don’t support the proposal and there may be some in favor of the project as well. City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 3a) Page 8 Title: Special City Council Meeting Minutes of February 29, 2016 Mayor Spano closed public hearing. Councilmember Lindberg thanked the residents for coming to speak to the Council tonight. He explained there have been a lot of conversations over many months about this project. He stated that public process is very important so the Council can listen and validate the residents because the residents’ opinions do count. Councilmember Lindberg stated his decision is not going to make everyone happy. He supports approval of these projects because there is a direct benefit to Ward 3 neighborhoods, noting that nobody disagreed with the fact that the street needs improving. Councilmember Lindberg stated in 2007, the City went through the last vision process. Each of the plans recognized that the connections identified tonight are needed. He explained that his mind wasn’t made up until tonight as he was still listening to feedback, considerations, and staff reports. Councilmember Lindberg stated he was walking through the affected neighborhood with his family, when his daughter asked why they were walking on the street and not a sidewalk. He stated that he takes a longer view of this project; he wants his daughter to choose the City as he did. It was moved by Councilmember Lindberg, seconded by Councilmember Mavity, to waive the reading and adopt Resolution No. 16-035 accepting the project report, establishing Improvement Project No. 4016-1000 for the 2016 Pavement Management project, approving plans and specifications and authorizing advertisement for bids for this project; and, to waive the reading and adopt Resolution No. 16-036 accepting the project report, establishing Improvement Project No. 4016-2000 for the 2016 Connect the Park! project, approving plans and specifications and authorizing advertisement for bids for this project. Councilmember Miller stated he really believes in sidewalks as stated in his campaign. That said, he also values residents having their opinions heard and would like to discuss changing this process so that residents feel validated. Councilmember Miller stated these sidewalks really do lead somewhere; they’re thoroughfares. He felt public process had improved because Councilmember Lindberg and staff went an extra mile. For this reason, Councilmember Miller stated his support of the project as proposed. Councilmember Mavity requested staff look at enforcement of people or the City for maintaining the sidewalks in the winter. As to the salt, she requested that uses be guided to reduce run off. Councilmember Hallfin stated the sidewalk plans that come before the Council are usually tumultuous. Typically, those directly affected do not want the sidewalks. Last year he was directly affected and like the residents this evening, he didn’t want the sidewalk. He explained the elected officials also live here and are also affected by the Council’s decisions. Councilmember Hallfin noted that between now and the time the sidewalks are installed, there is still time to tweak the plans and staff will work with residents up until the day concrete is poured. Since the sidewalks were installed in Ward 2, the walk is more pleasant. He suggested that the residents pause to reserve judgment. Mayor Spano stated that he supports the proposed motion. He explained the City is trying to build a system, which means some residents that don’t want sidewalks get them and vice versa. Every time this discussion is held, this is what it looks like. In closing, he noted City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 3a) Page 9 Title: Special City Council Meeting Minutes of February 29, 2016 this was supposed to be voted on in early February but was delayed only because Councilmember Lindberg requested more time. Last year, he stated that his aunt received a sidewalk that she didn’t want but since installation, she has changed her mind and now likes having the sidewalks. Mayor Spano noted that Mr. Sullivan has worked and made things better where possible. The motion passed 6-0. (Councilmember Sanger absent) 4. Communications SWLRT Update Mr. Harmening stated that the project is moving very quickly and nearing 100% on the design. One thing in particular relates to the enhancement at the bridges at Louisiana and Beltline. The structure and fencing are very basic and the City needs to work more with SPO to determine the aesthetics due to the high profile location. In addition, there was no lighting proposed for that area, so the City is working to include that. He explained that the City would be responsible for any costs for this change, which would need to be added via change orders later in the process. Mr. Harmening stated that he wanted to make the Council aware of the needed improvements. Councilmember Mavity stated the Caucus is tomorrow night. She encouraged residents use the Secretary of State’s website to find where to go in the City. Councilmember Hallfin stated that the Children First fundraiser breakfast is at 7:00 a.m. on Thursday morning. He directed anyone interested in attending to the Children First website for more information. 5. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 9:39 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Jake Spano, Mayor Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 4, 2016 Minutes: 3b UNOFFICIAL MINUTES JOINT CITY COUNCIL/SCHOOL BOARD MEETING ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA MARCH 14, 2016 5:30 p.m. Dinner Call to Order Mayor Spano called the meeting to order at 6 p.m. Council Members present: Mayor Jake Spano, Anne Mavity, Sue Sanger, Greg Lindberg, Tim Brausen, Thom Miller, and Steve Hallfin School Board Members present: Board Chair Joe Tatalovich, Bruce Richardson, Jim Yarosh, Jim Beneke, Ken Morrison, Nancy Gores, and Karen Waters City Staff present: Deputy City Manager Nancy Deno; Operations and Recreation Director Cindy Walsh; Recreation Superintendent Jason West; Principal Planner Meg McMonigal; Economic Development Coordinator Greg Hunt; Fire Chief Steve Koering; and Communications and Marketing Manager Jackie Larson School District Staff present: Superintendent Rob Metz; Human Resources Director Rick Kreyer; Business Manager Sandy Salin; Director of Special Services Tami Reynolds; Director of Community Education Lisa Greene; Executive Assistant to the Superintendent Cindy Bennett; Director of Communications Sara Thompson; Director of Teaching and Learning Kari Ross; and Athletic Director Andy Ewald The joint meeting was facilitated by Paula Forbes, Forbes Solutions PLLC. The City Council and School Board discussed: School District 2015-2020 Strategic Plan St. Louis Park City Council Priorities/Goals 2016-2026 School District and City Facility Planning Updates and Future Scenarios City of St. Louis Park 2016 Report to the Community City of St. Louis Park Development Activities/SWLRT and Visioning Process/ Comprehensive Plan Updates Race and Equity Initiatives in the School District and the City Growing and Enhancing School District and City Partnership Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 10:00 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Jake Spano, Mayor Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 4, 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance and Map Amendments for AC Hotel by Marriott Final PUD RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to approve the second reading and Adopt Ordinance creating Section 36-268-PUD 4 of the Zoning Code and amending the Zoning Map from the O- Office to PUD 4 for the property located at 5075 Wayzata Boulevard, and approve the summary ordinance for publication. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Is the rezoning consistent with the Comprehensive Plan? SUMMARY: Approval would allow construction of a six story, 126 room AC Hotel by Marriott. The building is the third phase of the Central Park West Planned Unit Development (PUD) and contains approximately 3,600 square feet of restaurant/lounge area, 1,700 square feet of meeting space, a spa, and 189 parking spaces. The PUD application requires a rezoning of the property and zoning text amendments. The rezoning is consistent with the office designation in the Comprehensive Plan and the proposed use of the property. The City Council approved the first reading of the Ordinance on March 21, 2016. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance Ordinance Summary Official Exhibits Prepared by: Nicole Mardell, Associate Planner Reviewed by: Sean Walther, Planning & Zoning Supervisor Michele Schnitker, Housing Supervisor & Deputy Community Development Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Action Agenda Item: 4a City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Page 2 Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance and Map Amendments for AC Hotel by Marriott Final PUD ORDINANCE NO. ____-16 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ST. LOUIS PARK CITY CODE RELATING TO ZONING BY CREATING SECTION 36-268-PUD 4 AS A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5075 WAYZATA BOULEVARD THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK DOES ORDAIN: Findings Sec. 1. The City Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission (Case No. 16-01-PUD) for amending the Zoning Ordinance to create a new Planned Unit Development (PUD) Zoning District. Sec. 2. The Comprehensive Plan designates this property as Office. Sec. 3. The Zoning Map shall be amended by reclassifying the following described lands from O-Office to PUD 4: That portion of Lot 3, Block 1, Central Park West P.U.D. that lies therein the boundary of the City of St. Louis Park. Sec. 4. The St. Louis Park Ordinance Code, Section 36-268 is hereby amended to add the following Planned Unit Development Zoning District: Section 36-268-PUD 4. (a) Development Plan The site shall be developed, used and maintained in conformance with the following Final PUD signed Official Exhibits: 1. C100 – Site Conditions After Phases 1 & 2 With Demolition Plan 2. C200 – Proposed Site Plan 3. C300 – Storm Drainage and Grading Plan 4. C400 – Utility Plan 5. C500 – Erosion Control Plan 6. C600 – Storm Water and Erosion Control Details 7. E002 – Electrical Site Plan 8. A101 – Parking Garage Level, First Floor Plan 9. A201 – Exterior Elevations 10. A202 – Exterior Elevations 12. A901 – 3D Views 13. L000 – Tree Inventory 14. L001 – Tree Mitigation Plan 15. L100 – Landscape Plan 16. L101 – Landscape Details and Notes 17. PH-3 – Phasing Plan 18. Designed Outdoor Recreation Area Calculation Exhibit 19. Zoning Map Amendment Exhibit 20. Temporary Off-Site Parking Plan City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Page 3 Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance and Map Amendments for AC Hotel by Marriott Final PUD The site shall also conform to the following requirements: (1) The property shall be developed with 126 rooms, approximately 1,700 square feet of meeting space, and approximately 3,620 square feet of hotel/restaurant/lounge area. (2) Parking will be provided both on-site and off-site. The on-site parking will contain twenty-seven (27) underground spaces and fifty-two (52) surface spaces. Off-site parking will include one-hundred-ten (110) parking spaces in an above ground ramp located on Outlot A. Parking will total one- hundred-eighty-nine (189) parking spaces. (3) The maximum building height shall not exceed 84 feet and six stories. (4) The development site shall provide 1,416 square feet of Designated Outdoor Recreation Area (DORA) on a rooftop deck. (b) Permitted Uses (1) Hotel/motel. The conditions are as follows: Building heights shall be limited to six stories or 84 feet. (c) Accessory Uses Accessory uses are as follows: (1) Bar, if accessory to a hotel and in compliance with City liquor licensing requirements. (2) Parking lots. (3) Parking ramps utilizing the same exterior facing materials as the principal buildings. (4) Public transit stops/shelters. (5) Food Service a. Service space is limited to space designated in Site Plan. (6) Outdoor seating, public address (PA) system prohibited. (7) No outdoor storage allowed. (d) Special Performance Standards (1) All general zoning requirements not specifically addressed in this ordinance shall be met, including but not limited to: outdoor lighting, architectural design, landscaping, parking and screening requirements. (2) All trash, garbage, waste materials, trash containers, and recycling containers shall be kept in the manner required by this Code. All trash handling and loading areas shall be located within the building and screened from view. (3) Signage shall be allowed in conformance with the approved redevelopment plan or final PUD site plan and development agreement in accordance with the following conditions: City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Page 4 Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance and Map Amendments for AC Hotel by Marriott Final PUD a. Pylon signs are not permitted; b. Freestanding monument signs shall utilize the same exterior materials as the principal buildings and shall not interfere with pedestrian/bicycle or automobile circulation and visibility; c. Pedestrian-scale signs visible from public sidewalks shall be no more than three feet in vertical dimension unless flush with the building wall; and d. Maximum allowable number, sizes and heights of signs shall be regulated by section 36-362, C-2 requirements, except as may be specifically modified by the final PUD. (4) Façade. The following façade design guidelines shall be applicable to all ground floor non-residential facades: a. For street-facing facades, no more than 10% of total window and door area shall be glass block, mirrored, spandrel, frosted or other opaque glass, finishes or material including window painting and signage. The remaining 90% of window and door area shall be clear or slightly tinted glass, allowing views into and out of the interior. b. Visibility into the space shall be maintained for a minimum depth of three feet. This requirement shall not prohibit the display of merchandise. (5) Awnings. a. Awnings must be constructed of heavy canvas fabric, metal and/or glass. Plastic and vinyl awnings are prohibited. b. Backlit awnings are prohibited. Sec. 5. The contents of Planning Case File 16-01-PUD are hereby entered into and made part of the public hearing record and the record of decision for this case. Sec. 6. This Ordinance shall take effect fifteen days after its publication. Public Hearing February 3, 2016 First Reading March 21, 2016 Second Reading April 4, 2016 Date of Publication April 14, 2016 Date Ordinance takes effect April 29, 2016 Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council April 4, 2016 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Approved as to Form and Execution: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Soren Mattick, City Attorney City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Page 5 Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance and Map Amendments for AC Hotel by Marriott Final PUD SUMMARY FOR PUBLICATION ORDINANCE NO. ____-16 AN ORDINANCE CREATING A NEW PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICT 5075 WAYZATA BOULEVARD This ordinance states that the Zoning Map shall be amended from O-Office to PUD 4 and the Zoning Ordinance Code, Section-268 will be amended to add Section 36-268-PUD 4. This ordinance shall take effect 15 days after publication. Adopted by the City Council April 4, 2016 Jake Spano /s/ Mayor A copy of the full text of this ordinance is available for inspection with the City Clerk. Published in St. Louis Park Sailor: April 14, 2016 STM x STM x STM x STM x STM x STMx STM x STM x STMx STM x S T M x S T M x S T M x S T M x ST M x ST M x ST M x ST M x ST M x ST M x STM x STM x STM x STM x STM x STMx STMx STMx STMx STMx STMx STMx S T M x S T M xSTM xSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMx STMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTM x STM x Wx Wx Wx Wx Wx Wx Wx Wx Wx Wx Wx W x W x W x SSx SSx SSx SSx SSx SSx SSx SSx SSx SSx SSx SSxGxGxGxGxGxGxGxGxGxS STMx STMx8828828828828818818818808 8 0 880880ExExExExExExExExEx880879879879879879879 8 7 9 878878878878878878SSSSx SSx SSx SSx SSSSSSSSSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxW A Y Z A T A B O U L E V A R D EXISTING CONCRETECURB & GUTTERUTICA AVENUELOT 3 - HOTELEXISTING PROPERTYLINEEXISTING PROPERTYLINEEXISTING CONCRETECURB & GUTTEREXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK EXISTING ASPHALT DRIVEWAY EXISTING ASPHALTDRIVEWAY10.00' BUILDING SETBACK5.00' EASEMENTEXISTING SIGN(TYP)PHASE I RESIDENTIALBUILDINGEXISTING 24.00' ACCESS EASEMENTEXISTING PROPERTYLINEEXISTING ACCESSEASEMENTEXISTING CONCRETECURB TO BE REMOVEDEXISTING CONCRETEPAVERS PARKING LOTPHASE II RESIDENTIALBUILDINGEXISTING ASPHALTDRIVEWAYEXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALKEX STM MHRIM: 877.86'EXISTING CONCRETEDRIVEWAY APRONEXISTING CONCRETESIDEWALK APRONCITY OF ST. LOUIS PARKCITY OF GOLDEN VALLEYEX SAN MHRIM: 878.01'INV (W): 861.01'INV (E): 861.01'EX 12" S A NEXISTING CONCRETE CURB,GUTTER & SIDEWALK TO BEREMOVEDEXISTING CONCRETE CURB,GUTTER & SIDEWALK TO BEREMOVEDEX STM INLRIM: 881.88'INV (S): 875.75'EX STM MHRIM: 877.52'INV (W): 868.81'INV (S): 871.02'INV (E): 868.81'INV (NW): 873.42'EX STM MHRIM: 877.24'INV (W): 868.69'INV (S): 872.74'INV (E): 868.69'INV (NW): 873.04EX STM CBRIM: 877.32'EX STM CBRIM: 878.19'INV (SE): 874.98'EX STM CBRIM: 878.08'INV (NW) 874.87'INV (SE): 874.87'EX STM MHRIM: 878.47'INV (NW): 868.52'INV (SE): 868.52' SAN MH(TO BE INSTALLEDBY OTHERS)RIM: 879.03'INV (E): 864.23'EX STM CBRIM: 877.42'INV (SE): 874.02'EX STM CBRIM: 877.15'INV (N): 871.45'EX STM CBRIM: 876.82'INV (N): 872.52'INV (E): 872.52'EX STM CBRIM: 876.85'INV (W): 872.98'EX STM CBRIM: 877.87'EX STM CBRIM: 877.19'EX STM CBRIM: 876.87'EX 54" RCP STM EX 54 " R C P S T M 10" WATERSERVICE LINE(TO BE INSTALLEDBY OTHERS)SAW-CUT AND DEMOLISH EXISTINGPAVEMENT, CURB & GUTTER ANDSIDEWALK AS REQUIRED FORUTILITY INSTALLATIONS & NEW CURBINSTALLATIONS. REPLACE REMOVEDMATERIALS TO MATCH EXISTINGSITE WILL BE PRE-GRADED AS PART OF PHASES 1 OR 2AS SHOWN ON "CENTRAL PARK WEST - PHASE 1"PLANS FROM KIMLEY-HORN, DATED 6/8/2015EXISTING 54" RCPSTORM SEWEREXISTING 18" D.I.P.FORCEMAIN8" PVCSANITARY SERVICE(TO BE INSTALLEDBY OTHERS)SHEETNUMBERPROJECTNUMBERISSUEPHASE:DATEISSUED:MARK DATE DESCRIPTION20'040'10'SHEET TITLE:PROJECT TITLE:PROJECT OWNER:PROJECT LOCATION:I:\30900\30906 - AC by Marriott - St. Louis Park, MN\01. Drawings\Autocad\Civil\30906 - C100.dwg Printed by: ekaul on Feb 29, 2016 - 8:40am C 30906126 UNIT6 STORYAC HOTEL BYMARRIOTTACSLP, L.L.C.GOLDEN VALLEY /ST. LOUIS PARK, MNCITY REVIEWS02/29/201642202JAMES R. SKOWRONSKITyped or Printed Name:Registration Number:Signature:Date:I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was preparedby me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly LicensedProfessional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. 2/29/2016STMxEXISTING STORM SEWERSSxEXISTING SANITARY SEWERWxEXISTING WATERMAINLEGENDLOT LINEEXISTING PROPERTY CORNERAREA TO BEDEMOLISHEDExEXISTING UNDERGROUNDELECTRICOHEEXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRICTxEXISTING TELEPHONE LINEREFERENCES1. SITE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY PROVIDED BY OTHERS.2. ELEVATION CONTOURS ARE IN 1 FOOT INTERVALS.GENERAL NOTES1. PROMPTLY INFORM THE ENGINEER OF ANY ERROR OR DISCREPANCY DISCOVERED IN THESE DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS ORCONFLICTS BETWEEN THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS IN ORDER THAT ADJUSTMENTS CAN BE MADE.2. THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO ANY AND ALL EASEMENTS AND/OR RIGHT-OF-WAYS ASSOCIATED WITH UTILITIES, ROADS, DRAINAGEAREAS, ETC. SHOWN OR OTHERWISE.3. THE USE OF EXPLOSIVES AS A DEMOLITION METHOD WILL NOT BE PERMITTED.4. ALL DEBRIS FROM CONCRETE REMOVAL TO BE TAKEN OFF SITE AND PROPERLY DISPOSED OF BY CONTRACTOR.5. CONTRACTOR TO REPAIR/REPLACE ANY PORTIONS OF EXISTING SIDEWALK DAMAGED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AT NOADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER.6. IF SEPTIC TANK OR OTHER UNDERGROUND TANKS OR UTILITIES ARE ENCOUNTERED, NOTIFY ENGINEER OR OWNER, BEFORE REMOVAL.COMPLETELY REMOVE TANKS AND DISPOSE OFF SITE AND PROPERLY DISCONNECT AND SEAL ALL UTILITIES.7. A CONCERTED EFFORT TO LOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WAS MADE, HOWEVER, SOME EXISTING UTILITIES MAY NOT BE SHOWN.CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT REGIONAL AND LOCAL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO ANYDEMOLITION AND OR EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES.8. ALL DEMOLITION DEBRIS, INCLUDING THAT FROM CLEARING ACTIVITIES TO BE DISPOSED OF OFF SITE SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCEWITH STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS.9. STRIPPED TOPSOIL AND EXCAVATED FILL MATERIAL SHALL BE STOCKPILED SEPARATELY.EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUREXISTING MINOR CONTOURC100SITE CONDITIONSAFTER PHASES 1 & 2WITH DEMOLITIONPLANNORTH DNDNUPUPSSNO PARKING - FIRE LANENO PARKING - FIRE LANENO PARKING - FIRE LANE NO PARKING - FIRE LANE W A Y Z A T A B O U L E V A R D UTICA AVENUEPHASE I RESIDENTIALBUILDINGEXISTING CONCRETEPAVERS PARKING LOTPHASE II RESIDENTIALBUILDINGEXISTING CONCRETECURB & GUTTEREXISTING ASPHALT DRIVEWAY EXISTING ASPHALTDRIVEWAYEXISTING ASPHALTDRIVEWAYEXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALKEXISTING CONCRETESIDEWALKCITY OF ST. LOUIS PARKCITY OF GOLDEN VALLEYPROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALKPROPOSED HEATEDCONCRETE RAMP TOUNDERGROUND PARKINGPROPOSED UNDERGROUNDSTORMWATER DETENTION SYSTEMEXISTING SIGN(TYP)EXISTING CONCRETECURB & GUTTER24.00'114.00'R8.00'99.00'106.00'95.00'24.00'6.00'24.00'14.00'R3.00'18.00' TYP.9.00' TYP.R3.00'R8.00'R10.00'30.30'R10.00'R10.00'R10.00'R10.00'R10.00'R10.00'R3.00'R9.33'R3.00'R10.00'1.50'R3.00'PROPOSEDCONCRETESIDEWALKPROPOSED DUMPSTERENCLOSUREPROPOSED 6-STORYHOTEL BUILDING FFE: 882.0'UNDERGROUND PARKING FFE: 872.0'BUILDING FOOTPRINT =APPROXIMATELY 12,615 SF22.00'R3.00'R10.00'PROPOSED CONCRETERETAINING WALLSPROPOSED 8"CONCRETE CURBS30.06' TO SETBACK22.28' TO PROPERTY LINEPROPOSED MONUMENTSIGN(8) PROPOSED BICYCLEPARKING SPACES - (2)ADDITIONAL SPACES INUNDERGROUND PARKINGSEE DETAIL ON SHEET C60281.00'R3.00'R5.00'R8.00'R3.00'10.00' BUILDING SETBACKPROPOSED AREA WELLPROPOSED AREA WELL5.00' EASEMENTR3.00'APPROXIMATE OUTLINE OFCANOPY AND FOOTINGSEXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK2.45' TO SETBACKCONCRETE WALK/CURB RETURNSTO BE BUILT PER MnDOT STANDARDPLATE NO. 7035N SHOWN ONPAGE C601.SHEETNUMBERPROJECTNUMBERISSUEPHASE:DATEISSUED:MARK DATE DESCRIPTION20'040'10'SHEET TITLE:PROJECT TITLE:PROJECT OWNER:PROJECT LOCATION:I:\30900\30906 - AC by Marriott - St. Louis Park, MN\01. Drawings\Autocad\Civil\30906 - C200.dwg Printed by: ekaul on Feb 29, 2016 - 8:40am C 30906126 UNIT6 STORYAC HOTEL BYMARRIOTTACSLP, L.L.C.GOLDEN VALLEY /ST. LOUIS PARK, MNCITY REVIEWS02/29/201642202JAMES R. SKOWRONSKITyped or Printed Name:Registration Number:Signature:Date:I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was preparedby me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly LicensedProfessional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. 2/29/2016C200PROPOSED SITE PLANAREAS OF SITE1. TOTAL AREA OF SITE = 1.615 ACRES (70,349.4 SF)2.727$/$5($2)',6785%$1&( $&5(6 6) GENERAL NOTES1. ALL SIGNS AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL MEET ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE LOCALJURISDICTION.2. DIMENSIONS ON CURB AND GUTTER ARE TO THE FACE OF THE CURB, INCLUDINGRADIUS DIMENSIONS.SITE INFORMATION1.3$5&(/$5($ $&5(6 6) 1.1. ORIGINAL DEVELOPMENT PERCENT IMPERVIOUS = 94.8% (INFORMATIONPROVIDED BY CENTRAL PARK WEST - PHASE 1 & 2 STORMWATERMANAGEMENT REPORT, DATED MAY 7, 2015)1.2. PROPOSED PERCENT IMPERVIOUS = 76.49%1.3. NET DECREASE IN IMPERVIOUS AREA = 9,278 SF2. CURRENT USE: EMPTY LOT3. PAST USE: COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT & PARKING FACILITIES4. PROPOSED BREAKFAST/LOUNGE AREAS WILL TOTAL 3008 SF5. PROPOSED PARKING:5.1. (27) REGULAR PARKING STALLS IN ON-SITE UNDERGROUND PARKING5.2. (46) REGULAR PARKING STALLS IN ON-SITE SURFACE PARKING LOT5.3. (6) HANDICAP STALLS IN ON-SITE SURFACE PARKING LOT5.4. FOR TEMPORARY PARKING DURING CONSTRUCTION: (110) REGULARSTALLS WILL BE PROVIDED AS APPROVED BY CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY5.5. FOR OFF-SITE PARKING AT FULL DEVELOPMENT BUILD-OUT: (110) REGULARSTALLS WILL BE PROVIDED PER PARKING AGREEMENTLEGENDLOT LINEPROPOSED LIGHT DUTYPAVEMENTPROPOSEDUNDERGROUND STORAGENORTH DNDNUPUPSTM x STM x STMx STM x STM x STM x STM x STM x STM x STM x S T M x S T M x S T M x S T M x ST M x ST M x ST M x ST M x ST M x ST M x STM x STM x STM x STM x STM x STMx STMx STMx STMx STMx STMx STMx S T M x S T M xSTM xSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMx STMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTM x STM x Wx Wx Wx Wx Wx Wx Wx Wx Wx Wx Wx W x W x Wx SSx SSx SSx SSx SSx SSx SSx SSx SSx SSx SSx SSxGxGxGxGxGxGxGxGxGxS STMx STMx8828828828828818818818808 8 0 880880ExExExExExExExExEx880879879879879879879 8 7 9 878878878 878878878SSSSx SSx SSx SSx SSSSSSSSSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxS T M STM STM S TM S TM S TM S TM S TM S TM S TMSTMSTM STMSTMSTMSTMSTMSAN SAN SAN WWWWSTMSTMSTMSTMSTMSTMNO PARKING - FIRE LANENO PARKING - FIRE LANENO PARKING - FIRE LANE NO PARKING - FIRE LANE WWW A Y Z A T A B O U L E V A R D UTICA AVENUEPROPOSED 6-STORYHOTEL BUILDING FFE: 882.0'UNDERGROUND PARKING FFE: 872.0'PROPOSED NYLOPLAST DRAIN INLETRIM ELEV: 881.00'INV (SE) = 876.85'882881881881881880880880880 879879878PHASE I RESIDENTIALBUILDINGEXISTING CONCRETEPAVERS PARKING LOTPHASE II RESIDENTIALBUILDINGEXISTING CONCRETECURB & GUTTEREXISTING CONCRETECURB & GUTTEREXISTING ASPHALT DRIVEWAY EXISTING ASPHALTDRIVEWAYEXISTING SIGN(TYP)EXISTING 24.00' ACCESS EASEMENTEXISTING ASPHALTDRIVEWAYEXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALKCITY OF ST. LOUIS PARKCITY OF GOLDEN VALLEYEX STM MHRIM: 877.52'INV (W): 868.81'INV (S): 871.02'INV (E): 868.81'INV (NW): 873.42'EX STM MHRIM: 877.24'INV (W): 868.69'INV (S): 872.74'INV (E): 868.69'INV (NW): 873.04EX STM CBRIM: 877.32'PROPOSED CB#5RIM = 877.78'INV (N) = 873.42'INV (SW) = 873.32'INV (SUMP) = 870.32'EX STM CBRIM: 878.08'INV (SE): 874.87'EX STM MHRIM: 878.47'INV (NW,SE) = 868.52'INV (SW) = 869.52'EX STM MHRIM: 877.86'EX SAN MHRIM: 878.01'INV (W): 861.01'INV (E): 861.01'SAN MH(TO BE INSTALLEDBY OTHERS)RIM: 879.03'INV (E): 864.23'EX STM CBRIM: 877.42'INV (SE): 874.02'EX STM CBRIM: 877.15'INV (N): 871.45'EX STM CBRIM: 876.82'INV (N): 872.52'INV (E): 872.52'EX STM CBRIM: 876.85'INV (W): 872.98'EX STM CBRIM: 877.87'EX STM CBRIM: 877.19'EX STM CBRIM: 876.87'EX 54" RCP STM EX 54 " R C P S T M E X 54 " RC P S TM EX 12" S A N10" WATERSERVICE LINE(TO BE INSTALLEDBY OTHERS)EX STM INLRIM = 881.88'INV (NE) = 875.85'INV (E) = 875.75'PROPOSED CB#4RIM = 877.78'INV (NW) = 873.89'INV (SE) = 873.79'INV (SUMP) = 870.79'PROPOSED CB#3RIM = 878.82'INV (NW) = 874.49'INV (SE) = 874.39'INV (SUMP) = 871.39'PROPOSED CB#1RIM = 879.56'INV (W) = 875.63'INV (SE) = 875.53'INV (SUMP) = 872.53'PROPOSED CB#2RIM = 879.38'INV (NW) = 875.29'INV (SE) = 875.19'INV (SUMP) = 872.19'24LF 12" HDPE @ 1.0%70LF 12" HDPE @ 1.0%50LF 12" HDPE @ 1.0%39LF 15" HDPE @ 0.5%38LF 12" HDPE @ 1.0%PROPOSED JB#6RIM = 878.79'INV (S,E) = 873.13'INV (W, 18" HDPE) = 873.03'PROPOSED OUTLET STRUCTURESEE DETAIL ON SHEET C600RIM = 880.65'INV (S) = 872.97'INV (NE) = 870.74'67LF 18" HDPE @ 2.0%PROPOSED TRENCHDRAINRIM = 871.92'TO BE CONNECTED TO UNDERGROUNDPARKING PLUMBING.SEE PLUMBING PLANS FOR MORE DETAIL61LF 8" PVC @ 1.64%PROPOSED MONUMENTSIGNUNDERGROUND ADS STORMTECH SC-740 CHAMBERSYSTEM. BOTTOM INVERT OF ROCK = 870.97'BOTTOM INVERT OF CHAMBERS = 872.22'FINAL SYSTEM DESIGN PENDING ADS TECHNICALSUPPORT AND CONSTRUCTION LAYOUT/DETAILS881.25'881.50'881.00'881.50'881.95'881.77'880.90'879.85'881.95'881.95'881.65'881.55'881.05'881.82'878.75'878.80'880.56'879.98'879.13'880.60'880.05'879.98''880.46'879.55'879.32'879.35'880.78'879.84'877.96'878.26'879.42'879.55'878.93'880.50'880.32'880.15880.75872.00' (AT GARAGEENTRANCE BELOW)SLOPE DOWN879.40'877.90'879.25'PROPOSED DI#6ARIM = 879.14'INV (N) = 873.79'INV (SUMP) = 870.79'66LF 12" HDPE @ 1.0%EX STM CBRIM: 878.08'INV (SE): 874.98'8" PVCSANITARY SERVICE(TO BE INSTALLEDBY OTHERS)881.77879.05879.29881.29881.95'(FIRST FLOORDOOR)881.40'881.95'880.35'881.43'SLOPE DOWN @ 1.0%872.82'881.90'881.95'SHEETNUMBERPROJECTNUMBERISSUEPHASE:DATEISSUED:MARK DATE DESCRIPTION20'040'10'SHEET TITLE:PROJECT TITLE:PROJECT OWNER:PROJECT LOCATION:I:\30900\30906 - AC by Marriott - St. Louis Park, MN\01. Drawings\Autocad\Civil\30906 - C300.dwg Printed by: ekaul on Feb 29, 2016 - 8:41am C 30906126 UNIT6 STORYAC HOTEL BYMARRIOTTACSLP, L.L.C.GOLDEN VALLEY /ST. LOUIS PARK, MNCITY REVIEWS02/29/201642202JAMES R. SKOWRONSKITyped or Printed Name:Registration Number:Signature:Date:I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was preparedby me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly LicensedProfessional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. 2/29/2016C300STORM DRAINAGE& GRADING PLAN GRADING AND STORM DRAINAGE NOTES1. ALL ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE TO FINISHED GRADE.2. CLEAR ALL TREES, BRUSH, STUMPS AND OTHER ORGANIC MATERIAL FROM AREAS TO BE FILLED.3. REMOVE ALL UNSUITABLE MATERIAL (MUCK OR NON-COMPACTABLE MATERIAL) FROM AREAS TO BE FILLED.4. CONTRACTOR SHALL, WHEN GRADING BETWEEN CONTOURS AND BETWEEN POINTS OF SPOT ELEVATIONS, GRADE ON A UNIFORMSLOPE.5. CONTRACTOR SHALL, FOR ALL GRASSED AREAS, BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REPLACING ERODED SOIL, GRASS SEED AND/OR MULCHUNTIL AN APPROVED STAND OF GRASS IS ESTABLISHED.6. CONTRACTOR SHALL, BEFORE BEGINNING GRADING WORK ON SITE, INSTALL SILT FENCE AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. ASSEDIMENT BUILD UP AROUND SILT FENCE, REMOVE SEDIMENT AND REPLACE WHERE EROSION HAS TAKEN PLACE.7. EACH SECTION OF PIPE SHALL BE LAID TO SPECIFIED LINE AND LAID UPGRADE.8. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL DEBRIS AND OTHER MATERIALS RESULTING FROM DEMOLITION AND DISPOSE OFF SITE UNLESSOTHERWISE ADVISED BY OWNER.9. CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP ALL ROADS ADJACENT TO THE SITE CLEAN DURING CONSTRUCTION.10. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE AWARE OF EXISTING UTILITY LINES DURING PIPE LINE INSTALLATION. CALL ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FORLOCATIONS ON SITE.11. ALL ROADWAY AND DRAINAGE CONSTRUCTION ARE TO CONFORM TO LOCAL AGENCY STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. (LATESTREVISION AT THE BEGINNING OF CONSTRUCTION.)12. ALL NEWLY CONSTRUCTED SLOPES WHICH ARE STEEPER THAN 3 TO 1 MUST BE STABILIZED BY INSTALLATION OF EROSIONCONTROL MATTING AND SEEDED AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE.LEGENDSSxEXISTINGSANITARY SEWERSTMxEXISTING STORMSEWEREXISTING GASMAINGxEXISTINGOVERHEAD ELEC.OHEEXISTING BURIEDELEC.ExEXISTING BURIEDFIBER OPTICEXISTING CHAIN LINKFENCEXXXXFOxEXISTING BURIEDTELEPHONETxEXISTING BURIEDCABLE TVTVxWxEXISTINGWATERMAINPROPOSED MAJORCONTOURSPROPOSED MINORCONTOURSLOT LINENORTHSITE INFORMATION1.3$5&(/$5($ $&5(6 6) 1.1. ORIGINAL DEVELOPMENT PERCENT IMPERVIOUS = 94.8%(INFORMATION PROVIDED BY CENTRAL PARK WEST - PHASE 1& 2 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT, DATED MAY 7,2015)1.2. PROPOSED PERCENT IMPERVIOUS = 76.49%1.3. NET DECREASE IN IMPERVIOUS AREA = 9,278 SF2. CURRENT USE: EMPTY LOT3. PAST USE: COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT & PARKING FACILITIES4. PROPOSED PARKING:4.1. (27) REGULAR PARKING STALLS IN ON-SITE UNDERGROUNDPARKING4.2. (46) REGULAR PARKING STALLS IN ON-SITE SURFACEPARKING LOT4.3. (6) HANDICAP STALLS IN ON-SITE SURFACE PARKING LOT4.4. FOR TEMPORARY PARKING DURING CONSTRUCTION: (110)REGULAR SURFACE STALLS WILL BE PROVIDED ASAPPROVED BY CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY4.5. FOR OFF-SITE PARKING AT FULL DEVELOPMENT BUILD-OUT:(110) REGULAR STALLS WILL BE PROVIDED IN PARKING RAMPPER PARKING AGREEMENTGENERAL NOTES1. CONNECTION TO CITY STORM SEWER MAIN REQUIRESINSPECTION BY PUBLIC WORKS. CONTRACTOR SHALLCOORDINATE WITH CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY.EXISTING MAJORCONTOURSEXISTING MINORCONTOURS DNDNUPUPSTM x STM x STM x STM x STM x STM x STM x STM x STMx STM x S T M x S T M x S T M x S T M x ST M x ST M x ST M x ST M x ST M x STM x STM x STM x STM x STM x STM x STMx STMx STMx STMx STMx STMx STMx S T M x S T M xSTM xSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMx STMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTM x STM x Wx Wx Wx Wx Wx Wx Wx Wx Wx Wx Wx W x W x Wx SSx SSx SSx SSx SSx SSx SSx SSx SSx SSx SSx SSxGxGxGxGxGxGxGxGxGxS STMx STMx8828828828828818818818808 8 0 880880ExExExExExExExExEx880879879879879879879 8 7 9 878878878878878878SSSSx SSx SSx SSx SSSSSSSSSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxS T M STM STM S TM S TM S TM S TM S TM S TM S TMSTMSTM STMSTMSTMSTMSTMSAN SAN SAN WWWWSTMSTMSTMSTMSTMSTMNO PARKING - FIRE LANENO PARKING - FIRE LANENO PARKING - FIRE LANE NO PARKING - FIRE LANE WWW A Y Z A T A B O U L E V A R D UTICA AVENUEPROPOSED 6-STORYHOTEL BUILDING FFE: 882.0'UNDERGROUND PARKING FFE: 872.0'8828818818 8 1881880880880 880 8798798 7 8 PHASE I RESIDENTIALBUILDINGEXISTING CONCRETEPAVERS PARKING LOTPHASE II RESIDENTIALBUILDINGEXISTING CONCRETECURB & GUTTEREXISTING CONCRETECURB & GUTTEREXISTING ASPHALT DRIVEWAY EXISTING ASPHALTDRIVEWAYEXISTING SIGN(TYP)EXISTING 24.00' ACCESS EASEMENTEXISTING ASPHALTDRIVEWAYEXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALKCITY OF ST. LOUIS PARKCITY OF GOLDEN VALLEYEX STM MHRIM: 877.52'INV (W): 868.81'INV (S): 871.02'INV (E): 868.81'INV (NW): 873.42'EX STM MHRIM: 877.24'INV (W): 868.69'INV (S): 872.74'INV (E): 868.69'INV (NW): 873.04EX STM CBRIM: 877.32'EX STM CBRIM: 878.08'INV (SE): 874.87'EX STM MHRIM: 878.47'INV (NW,SE) = 868.52'INV (SW) = 869.52'EX STM MHRIM: 877.86'EX SAN MHRIM: 878.01'INV (W): 861.01'INV (E): 861.01'SAN MH(TO BE INSTALLEDBY OTHERS)RIM: 879.03'INV (E): 864.23'EX STM CBRIM: 877.42'INV (SE): 874.02'EX STM CBRIM: 877.15'INV (N): 871.45'EX STM CBRIM: 876.82'INV (N): 872.52'INV (E): 872.52'EX STM CBRIM: 876.85'INV (W): 872.98'EX STM CBRIM: 877.87'EX STM CBRIM: 877.19'EX STM CBRIM: 876.87'EX 54" RCP STM EX 54 " R C P S T M EX 12" S A N10" WATERSERVICE LINE(TO BE INSTALLEDBY OTHERS)EX STM INLRIM = 881.88'INV (E) = 875.75'INV (NE) = 876.75'PROPOSED MONUMENTSIGNEXISTING FIRE HYDRANT TO BERELOCATED%(1'10" FIRE AND DOMESTIC WATERSERVICE STUB TO BE INSTALLEDBY OTHERS IN SPRING, 2016)%(1'72&211(&7PROPOSED SERVICEWITH EXISTING STUB67 LF 10" FIRE ANDDOMESTIC WATER SERVICE(MATCH EXISTING MATERIAL)FIRE SERVICEPROPOSED SANITARY MANHOLE #1RIM = 878.75INV (E) = TBDEXISTING INV (W) = 866.17'64 LF 8" PVC SANITARYSERVICE @ TBD%PROPOSED SANITARY MANHOLE #2RIM = 880.10INV (NW) = TBDINV (SE) = TBD10 LF 8" PVC SANITARYSERVICE @ TBD%8" PVC SANITARY SERVICE STUB(TO BE INSTALLED BY OTHERS INSPRING, 2016)RELOCATED FIRE HYDRANT ANDWATER SERVICE LINEEX STM CBRIM: 878.08'INV (SE): 874.98'DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE6" WATER SERVICE LINE TOPROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT (TO BE INSTALLED BY OTHERS IN SPRING, 2016)PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT (TO BE INSTALLED BY OTHERS IN SPRING, 2016)EXISTING 54" RCP STORMEXISTING 18" D.I.P. FORCEMAIN8" PVCSANITARY SERVICE(TO BE INSTALLEDBY OTHERS)1. ALL ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON MEAN SEALEVEL DATUM.2. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FORVERIFYING THE EXACT LOCATIONS ANDELEVATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIESPRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. IFCONDITIONS ARE SIGNIFICANTLY DIFFERENTFROM THAT SHOWN ON THE PLANS, STOPWORK AND NOTIFY THE ENGINEER.3. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD ADJUSTMANHOLE RIMS, CLEANOUTS, ANDAPPURTENANCES TO MATCH FINISHEDGROUND ELEVATION.4. ALL WATER AND SEWER LINES MUST HAVEA MINIMUM OF 10 FEET HORIZONTALSEPARATION AND 18 INCHES VERTICALSEPARATION.5. ALL SEWER SERVICES SHALL BE 6 INCHESIN DIAMETER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.6. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATECONNECTION TO EXISTING SANITARYSEWER SYSTEM.7. UTILITY AND MECHANICAL CONTRACTORSSHALL COORDINATE INSTALLATION OFSEWER SERVICES ALL THE WAY INTO THEBUILDING TO ACCOMMODATE CITYINSPECTION AND TESTING.SHEETNUMBERPROJECTNUMBERISSUEPHASE:DATEISSUED:MARK DATE DESCRIPTION20'040'10'SHEET TITLE:PROJECT TITLE:PROJECT OWNER:PROJECT LOCATION:I:\30900\30906 - AC by Marriott - St. Louis Park, MN\01. Drawings\Autocad\Civil\30906 - C400.dwg Printed by: ekaul on Feb 29, 2016 - 8:41am C 30906126 UNIT6 STORYAC HOTEL BYMARRIOTTACSLP, L.L.C.GOLDEN VALLEY /ST. LOUIS PARK, MNCITY REVIEWS02/29/201642202JAMES R. SKOWRONSKITyped or Printed Name:Registration Number:Signature:Date:I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was preparedby me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly LicensedProfessional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. 2/29/2016C400UTILITY PLANNORTH1. ALL ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON MEAN SEA LEVEL DATUM.2. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THEEXACT LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF ALL EXISTINGUTILITIES PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. IFCONDITIONS ARE SIGNIFICANTLY DIFFERENT FROM THATSHOWN ON THE PLANS, STOP WORK AND NOTIFY THEENGINEER.3. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD ADJUST FIRE HYDRANTS, VALVESAND APPURTENANCES TO MATCH FINISHED GROUNDELEVATION.4. 8 MIL MIN. POLYWRAP ON ALL D.I.P. IS REQUIRED5. ALL COMPONENTS OF THE WATER SYSTEM, UP TO THEWATER METER OR FIRE SERVICE EQUIPMENT SHALL UTILIZEPROTECTIVE INTERNAL COATINGS MEETING CURRENTANSI/AWWA STANDARDS FOR CEMENT MORTAR LINING ORSPECIAL COATINGS. THE USE OF UNLINED OR UNCOATED(CAST-IRON, GRAY-IRON, STEEL, GALVANIZED, ETC.) PIPESHALL NOT BE ALLOWED.6. COMBINATION FIRE AND DOMESTIC SERVICES MUSTTERMINATE WITH A THREAD ON FLANGE OR AN MJ TO FLANGEADAPTER.7. UTILITY AND MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS SHALLCOORDINATE INSTALLATION OF WATER SERVICE PIPES,FITTINGS, AND VALVES ALL THE WAY INTO THE BUILDING TOACCOMMODATE CITY INSPECTION AND TESTING.WATER DISTRIBUTION NOTESSANITARY SEWER NOTESLEGENDSSxEXISTINGSANITARY SEWERSTMxEXISTING STORMSEWEREXISTING GASMAINGxEXISTINGOVERHEAD ELEC.OHEEXISTING BURIEDELEC.ExEXISTING BURIEDFIBER OPTICEXISTING CHAIN LINKFENCEXXXXFOxEXISTING BURIEDTELEPHONETxEXISTING BURIEDCABLE TVTVxWxEXISTINGWATERMAINPROPOSED MAJORCONTOURSPROPOSED MINORCONTOURSLOT LINEEXISTING MAJORCONTOURSEXISTING MINORCONTOURSSANPROPOSEDSANITARY SEWERSTMPROPOSEDSTORM SEWERWPROPOSEDWATERMAIN1. THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK UTILITIESDIVISION (952-924-2558) SHALL BECONTACTED AT LEAST 48-HOURS PRIORTO ANY WATER SHUT-OFFS, SEWERCONNECTIONS, EXCAVATIONS, OR ANYOTHER WORK RELATED TO THE CITY'SUTILITY SYSTEM. THE CONTRACTOR SHALLALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTINGTHE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER ANDSTORM SEWER SYSTEM DURINGCONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING THE COST OFREMOVING AND CLEANING OF ANY DEBRISIN THE LINES BOTH DURING AND AFTERCOMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION.2. CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMITS AREREQUIRED FOR ANY WORK WITHIN THERIGHT-OF-WAY, INCLUDING UTILITY WORK,CURB AND GUTTER, SIDEWALK, DRIVEWAYAPRONS, PARKING BAYS, ROAD CLOSURESAND SIDEWALK CLOSURES.3. AS-BUILT RECORD DRAWINGS CONSISTENTWITH CITY STANDARDS WILL BE REQUIREDPRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OFOCCUPANCY.4. ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE CITYRIGHT-OF-WAY AND WILL REQUIREAS-BUILT RECORD DRAWINGS TO BESUBMITTED IN PDF AND AUTOCADFORMATS.CITY UTILITY NOTES DNDNUPUPSTM x STM x STMx STM x STM x STM x STM x STM x STM x STM x S T M x S T M x S T M x S T M x ST M x ST M x ST M x ST M x ST M x ST M x STM x STM x STM x STM x STM x STMx STMx STMx STMx STMx STMx STMx S T M x S T M xSTM xSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMx STMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTM x STM x Wx Wx Wx Wx Wx Wx Wx Wx Wx Wx Wx W x W x Wx SSx SSx SSx SSx SSx SSx SSx SSx SSx SSx SSx SSxGxGxGxGxGxGxGxGxGxS STMx STMx8828828828828818818818808 8 0 880880ExExExExExExExExEx880879879879879879879 8 7 9 878878878 878878878SSSSx SSx SSx SSx SSSSSSSSSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxS T M STM STM S TM S TM S TM S TM S TM S TM S TMSTMSTM STMSTMSTMSTMSTMSAN SAN SAN WWWWSTMSTMSTMSTMSTMSTMNO PARKING - FIRE LANENO PARKING - FIRE LANENO PARKING - FIRE LANE NO PARKING - FIRE LANE WWW A Y Z A T A B O U L E V A R D UTICA AVENUEPROPOSED 6-STORYHOTEL BUILDING FFE: 882.0'UNDERGROUND PARKING FFE: 872.0'8828818818 8 1881880880880 880 879879878PHASE I RESIDENTIALBUILDINGEXISTING CONCRETEPAVERS PARKING LOTPHASE II RESIDENTIALBUILDINGEXISTING CONCRETECURB & GUTTEREXISTING CONCRETECURB & GUTTEREXISTING ASPHALTDRIVEWAYEXISTING 24.00' ACCESS EASEMENTEXISTING ASPHALTDRIVEWAYEXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALKCITY OF ST. LOUIS PARKCITY OF GOLDEN VALLEYEX STM MHRIM: 877.52'INV (W): 868.81'INV (S): 871.02'INV (E): 868.81'INV (NW): 873.42'EX STM MHRIM: 877.24'INV (W): 868.69'INV (S): 872.74'INV (E): 868.69'INV (NW): 873.04EX STM CBRIM: 877.32'EX STM CBRIM: 878.08'INV (SE): 874.87'EX STM MHRIM: 878.47'INV (NW,SE) = 868.52'INV (SW) = 869.52'EX STM MHRIM: 877.86'EX SAN MHRIM: 878.01'INV (W): 861.01'INV (E): 861.01'SAN MH(TO BE INSTALLEDBY OTHERS)RIM: 879.03'INV (E): 864.23'EX STM CBRIM: 877.42'INV (SE): 874.02'EX STM CBRIM: 877.15'INV (N): 871.45'EX STM CBRIM: 876.82'INV (N): 872.52'INV (E): 872.52'EX STM CBRIM: 876.85'INV (W): 872.98'EX STM CBRIM: 877.87'EX STM CBRIM: 877.19'EX STM CBRIM: 876.87'EX 54" RCP STM EX 54 " R C P S T M E X 54 " RC P S TM EX 12" S A N10" WATERSERVICE LINE(TO BE INSTALLEDBY OTHERS)PROPOSED MONUMENTSIGN345 LF SILT FENCE84 LF SILT FENCECONSTRUCTION ENTRANCETRACKING PAD - SEE DETAILON SHEET C600159 LF SILT FENCEINLET PROTECTION (TYP.)SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C6008" PVCSANITARY SERVICE(TO BE INSTALLEDBY OTHERS)EX STM INLRIM = 881.88'INV (E) = 875.75'INV (NE) = 876.75'SHEETNUMBERPROJECTNUMBERISSUEPHASE:DATEISSUED:MARK DATE DESCRIPTION20'040'10'SHEET TITLE:PROJECT TITLE:PROJECT OWNER:PROJECT LOCATION:I:\30900\30906 - AC by Marriott - St. Louis Park, MN\01. Drawings\Autocad\Civil\30906 - C500.dwg Printed by: ekaul on Feb 29, 2016 - 8:42am C 30906126 UNIT6 STORYAC HOTEL BYMARRIOTTACSLP, L.L.C.GOLDEN VALLEY /ST. LOUIS PARK, MNCITY REVIEWS02/29/201642202JAMES R. SKOWRONSKITyped or Printed Name:Registration Number:Signature:Date:I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was preparedby me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly LicensedProfessional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. 2/29/2016LEGENDPROPOSED MAJORCONTOURSPROPOSED MINORCONTOURSLOT LINENORTHEXISTING MAJORCONTOURSEXISTING MINORCONTOURS1. CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES IN PLACE AND APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES.2. ALL SILT FENCES SHALL BE INSPECTED DAILY. CLEANING, ADJUSTING AND REPLACING EROSION MEASURES SHALL BE DONE AS NECESSARY THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. ALL EROSIONMEASURES SHALL BE IN WORKING CONDITION AT THE END OF EACH WORK DAY.3. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED PER THE DETAILS OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.4. SEDIMENT FROM OVERLAND FLOW SHALL BE PREVENTED FROM LEAVING THE WORK SITE BY INSTALLING SILT FENCING PARALLEL TO THE CONTOURS LOCATED DOWNHILL FROM THE WORKAREA.5. STONE TRACKING PADS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT ALL CONSTRUCTION SITE EXITS TO PREVENT TRACKING OF SOIL. TRACKED SOIL SHALL BE COLLECTED FROM PAVED ROADS LOCATED NEARTHE CONSTRUCTION SITE AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.6. EXISTING VEGETATION SHALL BE REMOVED ONLY AS NECESSARY TO PERFORM CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. CLEARING OF LARGE AREAS THAT ARE CLEARLY OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OFCONSTRUCTION SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED.7. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RESTORED AND VEGETATED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AFTER DISTURBANCE.8. EROSION MEASURES SHALL NOT BE REMOVED UNTIL THE AREAS SERVED HAVE ESTABLISHED VEGETATIVE COVER.9. TEMPORARY MULCH SHALL BE PLACED WITHIN 30 DAYS OF GRADING OPERATIONS. ALL AREAS OF EXPOSED SOIL SHALL BE COVERED WITH A STRAW MULCH. MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED ATTHE RATE OF 1.5 TONS PER ACRE, MINIMUM IMMEDIATELY AFTER SPREADING, THE STRAW MULCH SHALL BE PROTECTED BY COVERING WITH A MAT OR CRIMPING. MULCHING SHALL BEREPLACED AND CRIMPED AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN ADEQUATE COVER UNTIL PERMANENT10. ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES MAY BE REQUIRED TO CONTROL EROSION AND/OR OFFSITE SEDIMENTATION. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING THE STABILITY OFALL GRADED AND/OR CLEARED AREAS UNTIL PERMANENT GROUND COVER IS ESTABLISHED. ANY AREAS DAMAGED BY EROSION SHALL BE REPAIRED TO ITS ORIGINAL CONDITION ANDPROTECTED FROM FURTHER EROSION AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER.11. CONTRACTOR MUST TAKE ALL NECESSARY MEASURES TO MINIMIZE TRACKING MUD ONTO PAVED ROADWAY FROM CONSTRUCTION AREAS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE MUD/SOILDAILY TO PREVENT TRACKING.12. ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS MUST BE STABILIZED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE, BUT IN NO CASE LATER THAN 14 DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLYCEASED.13. TEMPORARY VEGETATIVE COVER MUST BE PROVIDED CONSISTING OF A SUITABLE, FAST-GROWING, DENSE GRASS SEED MIX SPREAD AT 1.5 TIMES THE USUAL RATE PER ACRE. IFTEMPORARY COVER IS TO REMAIN IN PLACE BEYOND THE PRESENT GROWING SEASON, TWO-THIRDS OF THE SEED MIX SHALL BE COMPOSED OF PERENNIAL GRASSES.14. SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE EITHER MULCHED OR COVERED BY FIBROUS BLANKETS TO PROTECT SEEDS AND LIMIT EROSION.EROSION CONTROL NOTESCONSTRUCTION PHASINGPROVIDE VEGETATIVE COVER TO NEWLY GRADED AREAS BY ACCEPTABLE SEEDINGMETHODS AND MIXTURES. SEEDING FOR TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL SHALLBE AS FOLLOWS:OATSCEREAL RYEWINTER WHEATANNUAL RYEGRASS131*131**131**80**LBS./ACREEROSION CONTROL / SEEDINGSPECIES* SPRING AND SUMMER SEEDING** FALL SEEDING1. CONSTRUCTION IS ANTICIPATED TO BEGIN IN THE SPRING OF 2016. DEMOLITIONAND REMOVAL OF ANY EXISTING MATERIALS WILL OCCUR FIRST2. PRIOR TO ANY LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES, EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALLBE PUT IN PLACE AND MAINTAINED UNTIL SOIL STABILIZATION HAS TAKEN PLACE3. AFTER EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ARE IN-PLACE, SITE GRADING AND UTILITYINSTALLATION WORK CAN BEGIN4. FOLLOWING INITIAL GRADING WORK, THE CONCRETE BUILDING FOUNDATION/SLABCAN BE CONSTRUCTED5. CONSTRUCTION ON THE BUILDING CAN THEN BEGIN IN COORDINATION WITHREMAINING SITE IMPROVEMENTS, INCLUDING AGGREGATE BASE COURSEINSTALLATION, CURB AND GUTTER CONSTRUCTION, ASPHALT PAVING, CONCRETEWORK, ETC.1. TOTAL AREA OF SITE = 1.615 ACRES2.727$/$5($2)',6785%$1&( $&5(6AREAS OF SITESILT FENCECONSTRUCTIONTRACKING PADEROSION MATTINGINLET PROTECTIONC500EROSION CONTROLPLAN GENERAL NOTESA. PROJECT OFFICE WALL SWPPP POSTINGS:THE FOLLOWING ITEMS MUST BE POSTED TOGETHER IN A SINGLE, ORGANIZED LOCATION ON A WALL INSIDETHE PROJECT OFFICE: 1) SWPPP SITE MAPS (ALL PHASES); 2) SWPPP DETAIL SHEETS; 3) MAP SHOWINGLOCATION OF OFFSITE IMPORT OR EXPORT FACILITY; 4) REVISIONS TO DETAILS, SITE MAPS, ORSWPPP-RELATED RFIS; 5) SITE SWPPP BINDER; 6) SWCT PLACARD; 7) CURRENT OWNER STORMWATERCOMPLIANCE TRAINING CERTIFICATES FOR SUPERINTENDENT(S) AND COMPLIANCE OFFICER(S); AND 8)CERTIFICATIONS AND/OR TRAINING CERTIFICATES REQUIRED TO PERFORM INSPECTIONS BY THE APPLICABLECONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT OR AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION.B. PERMITTED PROJECT AREA:FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SWPPP AND ASSOCIATED STORMWATER PERMIT, 'PERMITTED PROJECT AREA' ISDEFINED AS ANY AND ALL AREAS WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE, AS SHOWN ON THE SWPPPSITE MAPS AND IDENTIFIED IN THE NOTICE OF INTENT TO THE AGENCY. ALL GROUND-DISTURBING ANDCONSTRUCTION-RELATED ACTIVITIES (MATERIAL STORAGE, DUMPSTERS, PARKING AREAS, PROJECT OFFICETRAILER, ETC.) MUST BE INCLUDED WITHIN THE PERMITTED PROJECT AREA LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE.OFFSITE AREA(S) TO BE DISTURBED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT (NOT ON OWNER PROPERTY):•WORK ASSOCIATED WITH UTILITY INSTALLATION ALONG WAYZATA BOULEVARD.ALL AREAS OUTSIDE THE PERMITTED PROJECT AREA (I.E., LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE) ACQUIRED FOR USE BYTHE GC OR A SUBCONTRACTOR OF THE GC (BORROW SOURCES, DISPOSAL AREAS, ETC.) MUST BE MANAGEDIN ACCORDANCE WITH APPENDIX E - TAB 21 OF THE 02370 SPECIFICATION. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIREDTO LOCATE OFFICE TRAILERS AND MATERIAL STORAGE AREAS FOR THE PROJECT WITHIN THE LIMITS OFDISTURBANCE. THE CONTRACTOR MAY REQUEST USE OF OFF-SITE LOCATIONS FOR OFFICE TRAILERS ORNON-ERODIBLE MATERIAL STORAGE; HOWEVER, APPROVAL MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE CONSTRUCTIONMANAGER PRIOR TO THEIR USE. REQUESTS WILL BE REVIEWED ON A CASE BY CASE BASIS AND IF APPROVED,LIMITATIONS ON USE WILL BE PROVIDED.C. SPECIAL PROJECT AREAS:THERE ARE NO SPECIAL PROJECTS, LOCATED BEYOND THE OWNER PERMITTED PROJECT AREA, REQUIRINGINSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE ASSOCIATED WITH THIS CONSTRUCTION PROJECT.D.1 NON-STORMWATER DISCHARGES:THE GENERAL PERMIT FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIESPROHIBITS MOST NON-STORMWATER DISCHARGES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE. ALLOWABLENON-STORMWATER DISCHARGES THAT OCCUR DURING CONSTRUCTION ON THIS PROJECT, ARE INCLUDED INTHE SECTION 5.2 OF THE GENERAL PERMIT.BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPS) MUST BE IMPLEMENTED FOR THE GENERAL PERMIT ALLOWABLEDISCHARGES FOR THE DURATION OF THE PERMIT. THE TECHNIQUES DESCRIBED IN THIS SWPPP FOCUS ONPROVIDING CONTROL OF POLLUTANT DISCHARGES WITH PRACTICAL APPROACHES THAT UTILIZE READILYAVAILABLE EXPERTISE, MATERIAL, AND EQUIPMENT.NON-STORMWATER COMPONENTS OF SITE DISCHARGES MUST BE UNCONTAMINATED NON-TURBID WATER.ALL NON-STORMWATER DISCHARGES MUST BE ROUTED TO A STORMWATER CONTROL PRIOR TODISCHARGE. WATER USED FOR CONSTRUCTION WHICH DISCHARGES FROM THE SITE MUST ORIGINATE FROMA PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY OR PRIVATE WELL APPROVED BY THE STATE HEALTH DEPARTMENT. WATER USEDFOR CONSTRUCTION THAT DOES NOT ORIGINATE FROM AN APPROVED PUBLIC SUPPLY MUST NOTDISCHARGE FROM THE SITE; IT CAN BE RETAINED IN RETENTION PONDS UNTIL IT INFILTRATES OREVAPORATES. WHEN NON-STORMWATER IS DISCHARGED FROM THE SITE, IT MUST BE DONE IN A MANNERSUCH THAT IT DOES NOT CAUSE EROSION OF THE SOIL DURING DISCHARGE.D.2 POWER WASHING:PROCESS WATER SUCH AS POWER WASHING WATER AND CONCRETE CUTTING EFFLUENT, AMONG OTHERS,MUST BE COLLECTED FOR TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL. IT MUST NOT BE FLUSHED INTO THE SITE STORMDRAIN SYSTEM OR DISCHARGED OFF-SITE.D. DISCHARGE POINTS:ALL DISCHARGE POINTS MUST BE INSPECTED TO DETERMINE WHETHER EROSION AND SEDIMENTATIONCONTROL MEASURES ARE EFFECTIVE IN PREVENTING DISCHARGE OF SEDIMENT FROM THE SITE AND/ORIMPACTS TO RECEIVING WATERS. SEDIMENT ACCUMULATION DOWNGRADIENT OF DISCHARGE LOCATIONSSHALL BE REPORTED AS A SEDIMENT DISCHARGE (SEE APPENDIX E - TAB 14, SEDIMENT RELEASES, OF THE02370 SPECIFICATION) AND THE POTENTIAL UPSTREAM CAUSE SHALL BE INVESTIGATED TO PREVENTFUTURE OCCURRENCE. CONTACT THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER (CM), CIVIL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT(CEC) AND STORMWATER COMPLIANCE TEAM (SWCT) TO DETERMINE APPROPRIATE ACTION FOR CLEANUP OFDISCHARGED SEDIMENT THAT MAY BE OUTSIDE OF THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE. SEE SAMPLING ANDMONITORING OF EFFLUENT PLAN (IF APPLICABLE).EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTESA. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AS REQUIRED BY THIS STORM WATERPOLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN. ADDITIONAL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED ASDICTATED BY CONDITIONS AT NO ADDITIONAL COST OF OWNER THROUGHOUT ALL PHASES OFCONSTRUCTION.B. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP'S) AND CONTROLS SHALL CONFORM TO FEDERAL, STATE, OR LOCALREQUIREMENTS OR MANUAL OF PRACTICE, AS APPLICABLE. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT ADDITIONALCONTROLS AS DIRECTED BY PERMITTING AGENCY OR OWNER.C. SITE MAP MUST CLEARLY DELINEATE ALL STATE WATERS. PERMITS FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITYIMPACTING STATE WATERS OR REGULATED WETLANDS MUST BE MAINTAINED ON SITE AT ALL TIMES.D. CONTRACTOR TO LIMIT DISTURBANCE OF SITE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH SWPPP IMPLEMENTATIONSEQUENCE, OR AS REQUIRED BY THE APPLICABLE GENERAL PERMIT. NO UNNECESSARY OR IMPROPERLYSEQUENCED CLEARING AND/OR GRADING SHALL BE PERMITTED.E. ALL DENUDED/BARE AREAS THAT WILL BE INACTIVE FOR 14 DAYS OR MORE, MUST BE STABILIZEDIMMEDIATELY UPON COMPLETION OF MOST RECENT GRADING ACTIVITY, WITH THE USE OFFAST-GERMINATING ANNUAL GRASS/GRAIN VARIETIES, STRAW/HAY MULCH, WOOD CELLULOSE FIBERS,TACKIFIERS, NETTING AND/OR BLANKETS. COMPLETION MUST BE ACHIEVED WITHIN 14 DAYS.F. DISTURBED PORTIONS OF THE SITE WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HASPERMANENTLY STOPPED SHALL BE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED AS SHOWNON THE PLANS. THESE AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED, SODDED, AND/ORVEGETATED IMMEDIATELY, AND COMPLETED NO LATER THAN 14 DAYSAFTER THE LAST CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY OCCURRING IN THESE AREAS.REFER TO THE GRADING PLAN AND/OR LANDSCAPE PLAN.G. SLOPES SHALL BE LEFT IN A ROUGHENED CONDITION DURING THE GRADINGPHASE TO REDUCE RUNOFF VELOCITIES AND EROSION. TEMPORARYAND/OR PERMANENT STABILIZATION SHALL BE APPLIED PERREQUIREMENTS IN THESE E&S CONTROL NOTES.H. DUE TO THE GRADE CHANGES DURING THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROJECT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BERESPONSIBLE FOR ADJUSTING THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES (SILT FENCES, ETC.) TOPREVENT EROSION AND POLLUTANT DISCHARGE OFF-SITE.I. ALL MEASURES STATED ON THIS SITE MAP, AND IN THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN, SHALLBE MAINTAINED IN FULLY FUNCTIONAL CONDITION UNTIL NO LONGER REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETED PHASEOF WORK OR FINAL STABILIZATION OF THE SITE. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURESSHALL BE CHECKED BY A QUALIFIED PERSON IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS OR THEAPPLICABLE PERMIT, WHICHEVER IS MORE STRINGENT, AND REPAIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SITEPLANS.J. STORM WATER POLLUTANT CONTROL MEASURES INSTALLED DURING CONSTRUCTION, THAT WILL ALSOPROVIDE STORM WATER MANAGEMENT AFTER CONSTRUCTION, ARE INCLUDED IN THE CONTRACTDOCUMENTS. THE SITE-SPECIFIC POST CONSTRUCTION STORM WATER OPERATION ANDMAINTENANCE (O&M) MANUAL IS INCLUDED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS.H. ALL PERMANENT CONTROLS AND SYSTEMS MUST BE INSTALLED AND FUNCTIONING AS DESIGNED AND FREEOF ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS DURING FINAL PROJECT INSPECTION AND APPROVAL.HAZARDOUS MATERIAL MANAGEMENT & SPILL REPORTINGANY HAZARDOUS OR POTENTIALLY HAZARDOUS MATERIAL THAT IS BROUGHT ONTO THE CONSTRUCTION SITESHALL BE HANDLED PROPERLY TO REDUCE THE POTENTIAL FOR STORMWATER POLLUTION. ALL MATERIALS USEDON THIS CONSTRUCTION SITE SHALL BE PROPERLY STORED, HANDLED, DISPENSED AND DISPOSED OFFOLLOWING ALL APPLICABLE LABEL DIRECTIONS. FLAMMABLE AND COMBUSTIBLE LIQUIDS SHALL BE STOREDAND HANDLED ACCORDING TO APPLICABLE REGULATIONS, AND, AT A MINIMUM, ACCORDING TO 29 CFR1926.152. ONLY APPROVED CONTAINERS AND PORTABLE TANKS SHALL BE USED FOR STORAGE ANDHANDLING OF FLAMMABLE AND COMBUSTIBLE LIQUIDS.MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEETS (MSDS) INFORMATION SHALL BE KEPT ON SITE FOR ANY AND ALL APPLICABLEMATERIALS. HOWEVER, MSDS MAY ALSO BE ACCESSED VIA TELEPHONE OR OTHER ELECTRONIC MEANS ORAPPARATUS.IN THE EVENT OF AN ACCIDENTAL SPILL, IMMEDIATE ACTION SHALL BE TAKEN BY THE GC TO CONTAIN ANDREMOVE THE SPILLED MATERIAL. THE SPILL SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE APPROPRIATE AGENCIES IN THEREQUIRED TIME FRAMES. AS REQUIRED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT, ANY SPILL ORDISCHARGE ENTERING WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES SHALL BE PROPERLY REPORTED.ALL HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, INCLUDING CONTAMINATED SOIL AND LIQUID CONCRETE WASTE, SHALL BEDISPOSED OF BY THE CONTRACTOR IN THE MANNER SPECIFIED BY FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONSAND BY THE MANUFACTURER OF SUCH PRODUCTS.THE GC SHALL PREPARE A WRITTEN RECORD OF ANY SPILL AND ASSOCIATED CLEAN-UP ACTIVITIES OFPETROLEUM PRODUCTS OR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS IN EXCESS OF 1 GALLON OR REPORTABLE QUANTITIES,WHICHEVER IS LESS, ON THE DAY OF THE SPILL. THE GC SHALL PROVIDE NOTICE TO OWNER IMMEDIATELYUPON IDENTIFICATION OF ANY SPILL. COPIES OF SPILL CRITICAL INCIDENT REPORTS SHALL BE PRINTED ANDMAINTAINED IN THE JOBSITE BINDER.ANY SPILLS OF PETROLEUM PRODUCTS OR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS IN EXCESS OF REPORTABLE QUANTITIES ASDEFINED BY EPA OR THE STATE OR LOCAL AGENCY REGULATIONS, SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY REPORTED TO THEEPA NATIONAL RESPONSE CENTER (1-800-424-8802) AND THE MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY(1-800-422-0798).THE STATE REQUIRES REPORTING WHEN:•THERE IS AN IMPACT TO HUMAN HEALTH•THERE IS AN IMPACT TO THE ENVIRONMENT•THERE IS A FIRE, EXPLOSION, OR SAFETY HAZARD•A SPILL IS NOT IMMEDIATELY CLEANED UP•THE SPILL WAS MORE THAN THE REPORTABLE QUANTITY OF 1 GALLON OF A PETROLEUM PRODUCTTHE REPORT SHOULD BE FILED WITH THE MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY WITHIN 24 HOURS OF ASPILL OCCURRING.THE REPORTABLE QUANTITY FOR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS CAN BE FOUND IN 40 CFR 302 AND THE US EPAWEBSITE:HTTP://WWW.EPA.GOV/SUPERFUND/POLICY/RELEASE/RG, AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RULES OF MINNESOTA.TO MINIMIZE THE POTENTIAL FOR A SPILL OF PETROLEUM PRODUCT OR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS TO COME INCONTACT WITH STORMWATER, THE FOLLOWING STEPS SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED:1) ALL MATERIALS WITH HAZARDOUS PROPERTIES, SUCH AS PESTICIDES, PETROLEUM PRODUCTS, FERTILIZERS,SOAPS, DETERGENTS, CONSTRUCTION CHEMICALS, ACIDS, BASES, PAINTS, PAINT SOLVENTS, ADDITIVESFOR SOIL STABILIZATION, CONCRETE, CURING COMPOUNDS AND ADDITIVES, ETC., SHALL BE STORED IN ASECURE LOCATION, UNDER COVER AND IN APPROPRIATE, TIGHTLY SEALED CONTAINERS WHEN NOT IN USE.2) THE MINIMUM PRACTICAL QUANTITY OF ALL SUCH MATERIALS SHALL BE KEPT ON THE JOB SITE ANDSCHEDULED FOR DELIVERY AS CLOSE TO TIME OF USE AS PRACTICAL.3) A SPILL CONTROL AND CONTAINMENT KIT (CONTAINING FOR EXAMPLE, ABSORBENT MATERIAL SUCH AS KITTYLITTER OR SAWDUST, ACID, BASE, NEUTRALIZING AGENT, BROOMS, DUST PANS, MOPS, RAGS, GLOVES,GOGGLES, PLASTIC AND METAL TRASH CONTAINERS, ETC.) SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE CONSTRUCTION SITEAND ITS LOCATION(S) SHALL BE IDENTIFIED WITH LEGIBLE SIGNAGE AND SHOWN ON SITE MAPS.a. THE SPILL CONTROL AND CONTAINMENT KIT SUPPLIES SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENT QUANTITIES ANDAPPROPRIATE CONTENT TO CONTAIN A SPILL FROM THE LARGEST ANTICIPATED PIECE OF EQUIPMENT ANDFROM THE LARGEST ANTICIPATED QUANTITIES OF PRODUCTS STORED ON THE SITE AT ANY GIVEN TIME.b. CONTENTS SHALL BE INSPECTED DAILY DURING THE DAILY STORMWATER INSPECTION.4) ALL PRODUCTS SHALL BE STORED IN AND USED FROM THE ORIGINAL CONTAINER WITH THE ORIGINALPRODUCT LABEL. CONTAINERS MUST BE STORED IN A MANNER TO PROTECT THEM FROM THE ELEMENTSAND INCIDENTAL DAMAGE.5) ALL PRODUCTS SHALL BE USED IN STRICT COMPLIANCE WITH INSTRUCTIONS ON THE PRODUCT LABEL.6) THE DISPOSAL OF EXCESS OR USED PRODUCTS SHALL BE IN STRICT COMPLIANCE WITH INSTRUCTIONS ONTHE PRODUCT LABEL AND REGULATIONS.USGS QUADRANGLE MAPNOT TO SCALEVICINITY MAPNOT TO SCALENATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY MAPNOT TO SCALEDEVELOPER/OWNER:RISLP, LLC.103 15TH AVENUE NW, SUITE 200WILLMAR, MN 56201SITE OPERATOR/GENERAL CONTRACTOR:__________________________SUPERINTENDENT:__________________________IMPORTANT: GC MUST SIGN ALL PLANSHEETS AND ANY NEW PLAN SHEETSISSUED BY THE CIVIL ENGINEERSITESITESITEIMPORTANT: GC IS TO USE CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY IDENTIFIED TRUCK ROUTES. GC TO USETHE SHORTEST ROUTE TO THE SITE FROM A CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY IDENTIFIED TRUCK ROUTESHEETNUMBERPROJECTNUMBERISSUEPHASE:DATEISSUED:MARK DATE DESCRIPTION20'040'10'SHEET TITLE:PROJECT TITLE:PROJECT OWNER:PROJECT LOCATION:I:\30900\30906 - AC by Marriott - St. Louis Park, MN\01. Drawings\Autocad\Civil\30906 - C500.dwg Printed by: ekaul on Feb 29, 2016 - 8:42am C 30906126 UNIT6 STORYAC HOTEL BYMARRIOTTACSLP, L.L.C.GOLDEN VALLEY /ST. LOUIS PARK, MNCITY REVIEWS02/29/201642202JAMES R. SKOWRONSKITyped or Printed Name:Registration Number:Signature:Date:I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was preparedby me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly LicensedProfessional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. 2/29/2016NORTHC501SWPPP NOTESNORTHNORTH APPROXIMATE WATER TABLEELEVATION = 862.00'BOTTOM OF ROCKELEVATION = 870.97'CRUSHED AGGREGATE BASE COARSEFINISHED SURFACE & HMABOTTOM OF SC-740 STORMTECHELEVATION = 872.22'TOP OF SC-740 STORMTECHELEVATION = 874.72'HWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHW100 YEAR STORMDETENTION WATER LEVELELEVATION = 873.52'10 YEAR STORMDETENTION WATER LEVELELEVATION = 872.69'2 YEAR STORMDETENTION WATER LEVELELEVATION = 872.23'GENERAL FILL - SEE SPEC SECTION 31 0513INV. = 872.97'INV. = 870.74'EMERGENCY SPILLWAYINV. = 873.97'18" HDPE PIPE @ 0.0%FLOW18" HDPE PIPE @ 2.0%TO EX. STM. MH.(1) 8" FLOW CONTROLORIFICE WITH PVC PIPEASSEMBLY INV. = 872.97'0.33'0.50'GROUT FILL,16,'(35(&$67CONCRETE OUTLET STRUCTURECAST IRON COVER AND FRAMERIM ELEV. = 880.65'ADJUSTMENT RINGS6" THICK PRE-CASTCONCRETE TOPSTEPS3.00'0.50'1.50'5.00'AASUMP AREA6" THICK CONCRETEWALLINV. = 870.79'870.74'(OUTLET PIPE INVERT)872.97' ^`,1&+287/(7 873.97'(TOP OF WEIR WALL)CAST IRON COVER AND FRAMERIM ELEV. = 880.65'ADJUSTMENT RINGS6" THICK PRE-CASTCONCRETE TOP(1) 8" FLOW CONTROLORIFICE WITH PVC PIPEASSEMBLYINV. = 872.97'C600STORM WATER &EROSION CONTROLDETAILSOUTLET STRUCTURE SIDE VIEW DETAILOUTLET STRUCTURE CROSS SECTION A-AUNDERGROUND SYSTEM SIDE VIEW DETAILSHEETNUMBERPROJECTNUMBERISSUEPHASE:DATEISSUED:MARK DATE DESCRIPTIONSHEET TITLE:PROJECT TITLE:PROJECT OWNER:PROJECT LOCATION:I:\30900\30906 - AC by Marriott - St. Louis Park, MN\01. Drawings\Autocad\Civil\30906 - C600.dwg Printed by: ekaul on Feb 29, 2016 - 8:42am C 30906126 UNIT6 STORYAC HOTEL BYMARRIOTTACSLP, L.L.C.GOLDEN VALLEY /ST. LOUIS PARK, MNCITY REVIEWS02/29/201642202JAMES R. SKOWRONSKITyped or Printed Name:Registration Number:Signature:Date:I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was preparedby me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly LicensedProfessional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. 2/29/2016GV-SM-050GV-STRT-030 DNDNUPUPExExExExExExExExExExExExDACB1.48.18.5THE DARK, DASHED LINE INDICATESTHE PROPERTY BOUNDRYMAIN ELECTRICAL ROOM- 1st FLOORMAIN PBX ROOM- 1st FLOORPROPOSED HOTELFIXTURE AAFIXTURE CC430.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.10.10.20.20.10.10.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.20.20.20.20.20.20.10.10.10.10.00.00.00.10.10.20.20.20.20.30.40.30.30.20.10.10.10.10.00.00.00.10.10.20.30.30.40.50.60.50.30.20.20.10.10.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.30.40.50.60.90.80.60.40.30.20.20.10.10.10.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.20.40.60.81.01.31.10.80.50.40.30.20.20.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.20.30.40.60.91.21.51.71.41.00.70.50.40.30.20.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.20.40.71.01.31.61.92.21.81.30.90.60.40.30.20.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.20.40.81.31.71.51.42.41.91.30.90.60.40.30.20.20.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.10.10.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.20.30.61.21.40.40.21.61.51.10.80.60.40.30.20.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.30.30.30.30.30.30.30.30.20.30.30.30.30.30.30.30.30.30.20.20.20.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.20.40.81.31.70.80.41.81.61.20.90.60.40.30.20.20.10.10.10.10.20.20.20.20.20.30.30.30.30.30.40.40.40.40.40.30.30.30.30.40.40.40.40.40.40.40.40.30.30.20.20.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.20.40.81.31.61.71.92.31.91.41.00.70.50.30.20.20.20.10.20.20.20.20.20.30.30.30.30.30.30.40.40.40.40.40.40.40.40.40.40.40.50.50.50.50.50.50.40.40.30.20.20.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.20.30.60.81.11.51.82.11.71.20.90.70.50.30.30.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.30.30.30.30.30.30.40.40.40.50.50.50.40.40.40.40.40.50.60.60.70.70.60.60.60.50.40.30.20.20.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.20.20.40.50.81.11.31.61.41.00.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.20.20.20.30.30.30.30.30.30.40.40.50.50.60.60.60.50.50.40.40.50.50.60.70.80.80.80.80.70.60.50.40.30.20.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.20.40.60.70.91.11.10.90.70.60.50.40.30.30.20.20.20.20.20.30.30.30.30.40.40.50.50.60.70.70.70.70.60.60.50.50.50.50.60.80.90.90.90.90.80.70.60.50.30.20.20.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.30.40.50.60.80.90.80.70.60.50.40.30.30.30.20.20.30.30.30.30.40.30.40.50.50.60.70.80.80.90.80.80.70.60.60.50.60.70.91.01.11.01.00.90.80.70.50.40.30.20.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.20.30.30.40.60.70.70.80.80.70.50.40.40.30.30.30.30.30.30.40.40.40.40.50.60.70.80.91.01.01.00.90.80.70.60.60.70.81.01.21.31.21.11.00.90.70.50.40.30.20.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.20.20.30.30.50.60.70.91.00.90.70.60.50.40.30.30.30.30.30.40.40.40.50.60.70.81.01.11.21.21.11.11.00.80.70.70.81.01.21.41.51.41.31.11.00.80.60.40.30.20.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.20.30.50.60.71.11.31.21.00.80.60.40.40.30.30.30.40.40.40.50.60.70.80.91.11.21.31.31.31.21.10.90.80.80.91.11.31.61.61.51.41.21.00.80.60.40.30.20.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.20.30.40.70.91.31.71.61.31.10.80.50.40.30.30.40.40.50.50.50.60.70.91.01.21.31.41.51.41.31.11.00.90.91.01.21.31.61.51.51.41.31.10.90.60.40.30.20.20.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.20.40.71.11.42.02.21.71.20.80.60.40.40.40.40.40.50.50.50.60.70.91.01.21.31.51.61.51.31.21.00.90.91.11.31.41.51.31.21.21.21.10.90.60.40.30.20.20.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.30.50.91.21.82.12.41.91.30.80.60.50.50.40.40.50.50.50.60.60.80.91.01.21.31.51.51.41.31.11.00.90.91.01.41.51.61.21.21.21.21.00.90.60.40.30.30.20.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.30.61.11.51.60.71.01.51.51.10.90.70.50.50.50.50.50.50.60.70.80.91.01.21.31.31.41.31.21.10.90.90.91.01.31.41.51.31.31.31.21.10.90.60.40.30.20.20.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.30.61.11.61.50.30.42.01.91.51.00.80.60.50.50.50.50.60.60.70.80.91.01.11.21.21.21.21.11.00.90.80.80.91.11.31.61.51.51.41.31.10.90.60.40.30.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.20.30.50.71.01.71.51.42.32.11.51.00.80.60.50.50.50.60.60.60.70.80.91.01.01.11.11.11.11.00.90.80.70.70.81.01.21.51.61.51.41.21.00.80.60.40.30.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.30.61.21.51.61.71.91.91.41.00.70.60.50.50.50.60.60.60.70.80.80.91.01.01.01.00.90.90.80.70.60.60.70.91.11.31.41.31.31.10.90.80.60.40.30.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.30.50.91.11.11.21.21.41.31.00.70.60.50.50.50.60.70.70.70.80.90.91.01.01.00.90.90.80.70.60.50.50.60.81.01.21.21.11.11.00.90.70.50.40.30.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.20.30.50.60.70.80.80.91.00.90.70.60.50.50.60.70.70.80.80.90.91.01.01.00.90.90.80.70.60.50.50.50.60.70.81.01.01.00.90.90.80.70.50.40.30.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.20.20.30.30.40.50.60.50.70.70.70.60.60.60.70.70.90.91.01.01.01.01.01.01.00.90.80.70.60.50.40.50.50.70.80.90.90.90.90.80.70.60.50.40.30.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.20.20.30.40.40.40.50.60.70.70.70.70.70.80.91.01.11.11.11.21.21.11.00.90.80.70.60.50.50.50.60.70.80.80.80.80.80.70.60.50.40.30.30.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.10.20.30.30.30.40.60.80.90.80.80.80.91.01.11.21.31.21.31.31.21.11.00.80.70.60.50.50.50.60.60.70.70.70.70.70.60.60.50.40.30.20.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.10.20.20.30.30.40.61.01.21.11.11.11.11.11.21.41.51.41.41.31.21.10.90.80.70.60.50.50.50.50.60.60.60.60.60.60.60.50.40.40.30.30.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.20.30.30.40.61.11.51.61.51.41.31.31.41.61.61.61.51.41.31.10.90.80.70.60.50.50.50.50.50.60.60.60.60.60.50.50.40.40.30.30.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.20.20.40.50.81.11.72.12.01.61.51.51.71.91.81.71.61.51.31.10.90.70.70.60.50.50.50.50.50.60.60.60.60.60.50.50.40.40.30.30.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.30.50.91.31.82.42.41.91.81.91.92.01.81.71.61.51.31.10.90.70.70.60.50.50.50.50.50.60.60.60.60.50.50.50.40.40.30.30.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.20.30.50.91.31.81.31.42.02.32.42.22.01.61.51.51.41.31.10.90.70.70.60.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.40.40.40.30.30.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.20.30.61.01.51.70.40.42.12.92.72.32.11.51.41.41.41.31.10.90.80.70.60.50.50.50.50.50.50.60.60.50.50.50.40.40.30.30.30.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.20.30.61.01.41.61.11.22.22.82.72.32.01.61.51.51.51.41.20.90.80.70.60.50.50.50.50.60.60.60.60.60.60.50.50.40.40.30.30.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.20.20.40.70.91.31.71.71.92.22.42.32.22.01.81.71.51.41.21.00.80.70.60.60.60.60.60.70.70.80.80.70.70.60.50.50.40.30.30.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.30.30.61.11.41.31.41.51.72.02.22.11.91.81.61.41.21.00.90.80.70.60.60.70.70.80.90.90.90.90.80.70.60.50.40.40.30.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.20.50.70.90.90.91.21.31.51.91.91.81.71.61.51.31.10.90.80.70.70.70.80.90.91.01.11.11.00.90.80.70.60.50.40.40.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.30.40.50.50.60.91.01.21.61.81.81.71.61.61.41.21.00.90.80.80.80.91.01.11.21.21.21.21.10.90.80.70.60.50.40.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.30.30.30.40.70.81.01.41.71.91.91.81.71.61.31.10.90.90.90.91.01.11.21.31.41.41.31.21.00.90.70.60.50.40.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.20.20.40.50.70.91.21.72.12.22.12.01.71.41.21.01.00.91.01.11.21.31.41.61.61.41.31.10.90.80.70.50.50.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.20.30.50.71.01.21.52.12.62.62.31.81.51.31.11.01.01.01.11.21.31.51.61.61.41.31.11.00.80.70.60.50.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.20.30.40.60.91.21.62.02.73.02.51.81.71.51.31.11.01.01.11.21.31.41.51.51.41.21.10.90.80.70.50.40.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.20.30.50.71.01.52.12.12.02.12.22.01.81.41.21.11.01.11.11.31.31.41.41.31.21.00.90.70.60.50.40.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.20.30.40.61.01.52.01.50.51.32.72.51.91.51.21.01.01.01.11.21.21.21.21.21.10.90.80.70.60.50.40.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.40.61.01.51.91.50.81.52.62.52.01.51.21.01.01.01.01.11.11.11.11.10.90.80.70.60.50.40.40.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.30.50.71.21.41.91.92.02.02.11.91.61.31.11.01.01.01.11.11.11.01.00.90.80.70.60.50.40.40.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.20.20.30.50.61.01.51.61.51.51.31.41.41.21.21.11.11.11.11.11.11.00.90.80.70.60.50.50.40.40.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.20.20.40.71.01.01.01.11.00.91.11.11.21.21.21.21.31.21.11.00.90.80.70.60.50.50.40.40.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.20.30.40.60.60.60.70.80.70.81.01.31.51.51.51.61.41.21.01.00.90.80.70.60.50.40.40.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.30.30.40.40.50.60.60.70.91.31.72.02.02.01.71.41.31.21.10.90.80.70.50.40.40.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.20.20.30.40.50.60.70.81.11.82.42.72.52.11.81.71.51.31.10.90.70.50.50.40.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.20.20.30.40.50.60.91.21.62.32.72.52.22.42.21.91.61.31.00.70.60.50.40.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.10.20.30.40.50.71.11.62.11.21.22.63.32.92.31.91.51.10.80.70.60.40.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.10.10.20.30.40.61.11.62.00.90.72.43.53.52.92.51.81.31.00.80.70.50.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.10.20.30.61.01.51.91.62.02.53.03.43.43.02.21.51.31.10.80.60.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.20.30.50.71.11.21.92.22.22.52.73.02.72.01.91.71.30.90.60.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.20.30.50.50.91.41.61.72.02.41.60.81.72.52.11.41.00.70.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.20.20.30.60.81.01.31.72.21.30.41.02.42.21.61.10.80.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.20.40.50.71.01.41.81.41.61.91.81.71.41.10.80.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.20.40.50.71.01.21.51.71.51.41.00.90.80.60.40.30.20.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.30.30.40.50.61.11.31.10.90.80.60.40.40.30.20.20.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.20.20.20.40.60.70.60.50.50.40.30.20.20.10.10.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.10.20.30.30.40.30.30.30.30.20.20.10.10.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.10.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.10.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.5111111111111CC-5AAAAAAAAAAAA2CC-3CC-3CC-5UTILITY TRANSFORMER- 208/120v SECONDARY- SEE GENERAL NOTES LISTED BELOW- VERIFY CLEARANCE REQUIREMENT w/UTILITY1GENERAL REQUIREMENTS:•COORDINATE WITH THE LOCAL ELECTRIC UTILITY COMPANY TO VERIFY THE EXACT REQUIREMENTS ANDREGULATIONS FOR THE TRANSFORMER AND ALL CORRESPONDING EQUIPMENT.•THE CUSTOMER SHALL INSTALL, OWN, AND MAINTAIN A CONCRETE TRANSFORMER PAD WHENEVER THEUNDERGROUND SERVICE REQUIRES A THREE PHASE TRANSFORMER PAD.•ALL CONDUITS SHALL ENTER THROUGH THE WINDOW OPENING PROVIDED IN THE PAD FOUNDATION. THESECONDUITS SHALL BE CUT OFF SO THE TOP OF THE CONDUIT IS FLUSH WITH THE SURFACE OF THE CONCRETEPAD.•ALL METALLIC CONDUITS SHALL BE FITTED WITH AN INSULATING BUSHING.•THE TOP OF THE PAD SHALL BE LEVEL AND ALL EDGES AND CORNERS ROUNDED OFF.STRENGTH REQUIREMENTS:•MINIMUM SOIL BEARING CAPACITY OF 2000 lb/sq. ft.•CONCRETE MIX SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM STRENGTH OF 3500 lb/sq. in. AFTER 28 DAYS. MAXIMUM AGGREGRATE3/4".•MINIMUM CONCRETE COVER OVER REINFORCING STEEL 2" UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.•REINFORCING STEEL ASTM-A615 GRADE 60 PLACED APPROXIMATELY 6" O.C. EACH DIRECTION AND SECURELYTIED TOGETHER.CLEARANCE REQUIREMENTS:•CONCRETE PADS SHALL BE INSTALLED NO LESS THAN 20 FEET FROM DOORS, COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS, ORWINDOWS WHICH CAN BE OPENED AND NO LESS THAN 10 FEET FROM PERMANENT (NON-OPENING) WINDOWS.•A MINIMUM DISTANCE OF 3' IS REQUIRED BETWEEN CONCRETE PADS AND NON-COMBUSTIBLE WALLS (MIN. 2 HRFIRE RATING)•A MINIMUM OF 3' OF WORKING SPACE MUST BE MAINTAINED FROM EACH SIDE OF THE TRANSFORMER AND AMINIMUM OF 10' MUST BE MAINTAINED ON THE FRONT (DOOR SIDE) OF THE TRANSFORMER. THIS IS TO ALLOWFOR COOLING, REPLACEMENT, AND OPERATIONS.•WHEN THE PAD IS LOCATED NEAR A TRAFFIC AREA, 8" STEEL POSTS FILLED WITH CONCRETE MUST BE PLACED ATCORNERS OF PAD FOR PROTECTION.SECONDARY REQUIREMENTS:•CONDUITS FOR THE SECONDARY CABLE SHALL BE PLACED ON THE RIGHT SIDE NEAR THE FRONT OF THE CABLEOPENING TO ACCOMMODATE SECONDARY CABLE TERMINATIONS AND PROVIDE ADEQUATE CLEARANCE FOR THETRANSFORMER OIL DRAIN VALVES. THE NUMBER OF CONDUITS SHALL BE PLACED AS SHOWN ON THE DAKOTAELECTRIC DIAGRAM.•THE LARGEST SECONDARY SIZE CONDUCTOR SHALL BE 750 kcmil.•A MAXIMUM OF 6 CONDUITS MAY BE USED FOR INSTALLATIONS OF LESS THAN 500 kVA•A MAXIMUM OF 8 CONDUITS MAY BE USED FOR INSTALLATIONS OF 500kVA TO 2000 kVA1.UTILITY TRANSFORMER:- COORDINATE INSTALLATION WITH XCEL ENERGY- ADHERE FULLY TO THE EXCEL ENERGY STANDARD FOR ELECTRIC INSTALLATION AND USE- THE EC IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SUPPLYING THE CT CABINET AND MOUNTING BOTH THE METER SOCKET ANDTHE CT CABINET AS WELL AS INSTALLING THE CT'S. (XCEL ENERGY WILL SUPPLY THE CT'S AND THE METERSOCKET)- THE SECONDARY LUGS ON THE TRANSFORMER ARE CAPABLE OF HANDLING 8 SETS OF 500 MCMCOPPER OR 8 SETS OF 750 MCM ALUMINUM - ADDITIONAL CONDUCTORS REQUIRE A SEPARATECONNECTION CABINET. IF A SEPARATE CONNECTION CABINET IS REQUIRED, THE EC IS RESPONSIBLE FORTHE PAD WITH UNDERGROUND WIREWAY (REFER TO EXCEL ENERGY STANDARDS)- TRANSFORMER SHOWN AT A PROPOSED LOCATION. THE EXACT LOCATION OF THE TRANSFORMER ISDICTATED BY THE UTILITY COMPANY.2. PROVIDE (4) SEPARATE 4" CONDUITS FOR BUILDING SERVICES:- (1) TELEPHONE / INTERNET, (1) CATV, (1) SPARE, (1) FUTURE FIBER- VERIFY EXACT SIZE(S) AND SOURCE LOCATIONS WITH LOCAL PROVIDERS- TERMINATE CONDUITS IN THE COMMUNICATIONS ROOM (222) LOCATED ON THE 1st FLOOR3. THERE SHALL NOT BE MORE THAN THE EQUIVALENT OF FOUR QUARTER BENDS (360 DEGREES TOTAL) BETWEENPULL POINTS, FOR EXAMPLE, CONDUIT BODIES AND BOXES. BOXES AND CONDUIT BODIES USED AS PULL ORJUNCTION BOXES SHALL COMPLY WITH ARTICLE 314.28 OF THE NEC.4. ALL UNDERGROUND SECONDARY CONDUCTOR INSTALLATION SHALL COMPLY IN FULL WITH THE NEC. REFER TOARTICLE 230.6 PRIOR TO BEGINNING INSTALLATION REGARDING WHEN CONDUCTORS ARE CONSIDEREDOUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING.SHEET NOTESGENERAL TRANSFORMER NOTESLIGHTING CONTROL NOTE•ALL EXTERIOR LIGHTING TO BE FED THROUGH A LIGHTING CONTACTOR ANDCONTROLLED VIA PHOTOCONTROL, ALLOWING THE LIGHTING TO AUTOMATICALLYSWITCH ON AND OFF AS NEEDED. THE LIGHTING CONTACTOR IS LOCATED IN THEMAIN ELECTRICAL ROOM (118) LOCATED ON THE 1st FLOOR. THE PHOTOCELL ISTO BE LOCATED IN A EASILY ACCESSIBLE LOCATION THAT DOES NOT DETRACTFROM ANY ARCHITECTURAL DETAILING. FOR BEST RESULTS, IT SHOULD BE PLACEDON THE NORTHEAST FACE OF THE BUILDING.DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:&RS\ULJKW&LWLHV(GJH//&$OOULJKWVUHVHUYHG SHEETNUMBERThis document contains confidential or proprietary information of Cities Edge, LLC. Neither this document nor the information herein is to be reproduced, distributed, used or disclosed either in whole or in part except as authorized by Cities Edge, LLC.PROJECTNUMBERSHEET TITLE:PROJECT TITLE:ISSUEPHASEDATEISSUEDPROJECT OWNER:PROJECT LOCATION:Certification & Seal:C:\Users\hgoodall\Documents\30906 - ARH - AC Hotel - SLP,MN - Central File_hgoodall.rvt 12/21/2015 2:47:30 PM AC HOTELBY MARRIOT12-18-2015PRELIMINARY SUBMITTALRevisionDateE002ELECTRICALSITE PLAN1ELECTRICAL SITE PLANScale: 1" = 15'-0"LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULEMANUFACTURERCATALOG NUMBERVOLTAGELAMPSMOUNTING#TYPEFINISHDESCRIPTIONNOTESCONTROLTAGAA CYCLONECY-11T4-VS3AR-5L-67W-4K POST TOP AREA LIGHT120 N/A LED / DRIVER POST TOPTBDCONTACTOR HAPCO #Y7C-14F6-SFO-BA-GFICC-3 LEOTEKAR18-15M-MV-NW-3-XX-350 POLE MOUNTED AREA LIGHT120 N/A LED / DRIVER POLE - 25'-0" TBDCONTACTOR PARKING AREA LIGHTINGCC-5 LEOTEKAR18-20M-MV-NW-5-XX-350 POLE MOUNTED AREA LIGHT120 N/A LED / DRIVER POLE - 25'-0" TBDCONTACTOR PARKING AREA LIGHTINGSITE LIGHTING STATISTICS.4 fc3.4 fc1.0 fcTOTAL POWER934 WATTSAREAIWòPOWER DENSITYZDWWVIWò8.5:1MAXIMUMAVERAGEMINIMUM MAX / MIN AVERAGE / MIN2.5:1PHOTOMETRICS(parking lot) DNDN UP UP 18x4818x4824x6024x4824x4818x4824x4824x4818x36 18x36 18x3618x3618x7218x4824x6024x4824x4824x4218x60 24x48 36DR 36"DR36"DRDYH REF. UP A202 A201 A2012 A202 1 1 2 1 A304 MEETINGMEETINGMEETINGMEETING ROOMROOMROOMROOM 126 2 A302 2 A302 LOBBYLOBBYLOBBYLOBBY 101 RECEPTIONRECEPTIONRECEPTIONRECEPTION 102 MARKETMARKETMARKETMARKET 103 MARKETMARKETMARKETMARKET STORAGESTORAGESTORAGESTORAGE 104 LIBRARYLIBRARYLIBRARYLIBRARY 105 MEDIAMEDIAMEDIAMEDIA SALONSALONSALONSALON 106 MEDIAMEDIAMEDIAMEDIA SALONSALONSALONSALON 107 ELEV.ELEV.ELEV.ELEV. LOBBYLOBBYLOBBYLOBBY 108 WOMEN'SWOMEN'SWOMEN'SWOMEN'S R.R.R.R.R.R.R.R. 109 MEN'S R.R.MEN'S R.R.MEN'S R.R.MEN'S R.R. 110 STAIR EXITSTAIR EXITSTAIR EXITSTAIR EXIT112ENGINEERINGENGINEERINGENGINEERINGENGINEERING 113 EMPLOYEEEMPLOYEEEMPLOYEEEMPLOYEE BREAK AREABREAK AREABREAK AREABREAK AREA 114 EMPLOYEEEMPLOYEEEMPLOYEEEMPLOYEE R.R.R.R.R.R.R.R. 115 CARTCARTCARTCART STORAGESTORAGESTORAGESTORAGE 116 HOUSEKEEPINGHOUSEKEEPINGHOUSEKEEPINGHOUSEKEEPING 117 ELECT./ELECT./ELECT./ELECT./ MECH.MECH.MECH.MECH. 118ADMINISTRATIONADMINISTRATIONADMINISTRATIONADMINISTRATION 121 VIDEO/TELE.VIDEO/TELE.VIDEO/TELE.VIDEO/TELE. EQUIPMENTEQUIPMENTEQUIPMENTEQUIPMENT 125 MEETINGMEETINGMEETINGMEETING RM STOR.RM STOR.RM STOR.RM STOR. 127 KITCHENKITCHENKITCHENKITCHEN 128 AC LOUNGEAC LOUNGEAC LOUNGEAC LOUNGE 129 BARBARBARBAR 130 BREAKFASTBREAKFASTBREAKFASTBREAKFAST AREAAREAAREAAREA 131 VESTIBULEVESTIBULEVESTIBULEVESTIBULE 132 SOUTHSOUTHSOUTHSOUTH STAIRSTAIRSTAIRSTAIR 133 NORTHNORTHNORTHNORTH STAIRSTAIRSTAIRSTAIR 134 ELEV. #1ELEV. #2 A401 1 A402 1 4 A301 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D 2 A301 2 A301 1 A302 1 A302 1 A301 1 A301 24' - 6"24' - 6" 196' - 0"24' - 6" 9' - 0 1/2" 2 A304 5 A30318' - 7"23' - 0"19' - 7"MECH.MECH.MECH.MECH. 113A SALESSALESSALESSALES 119 G.M.G.M.G.M.G.M. 120LUG. STOR.LUG. STOR.LUG. STOR.LUG. STOR. 123 WORK AREAWORK AREAWORK AREAWORK AREA 124 3 A301 3 A301 - --- AREA WELL FOR MECH. AREA WELL FOR MECH. 1.4 8.1 8.5 7.7 A.6 B.1 4 A303 1 A303 132A 128A 132B 133A 133B127126B126A125101B101D 101A 101C101E124 104 108119120 118117A113 112B110109 112A123106 107 113AW4W4 W4 W4 W4W4A W1 W2 W3 W1 W1 16' - 0"11' - 0" A305 1 A405 35 33 (8) BICYCLE PARKING AREAS, W/ TWO BICYCLE PARKING STALLS IN PARKING GARAGE AREA - --- A404 12 11 14 13 TRASH/TRASH/TRASH/TRASH/ RECYCLINGRECYCLINGRECYCLINGRECYCLING 138 5' - 0" A404 19 ELEVATOR SCHEDULE LOCATION MFG CAPACITY SPEED USAGE ELEV. #1 F/R OPENING SCHINDLER 3300 3500 #150 FPM PASSENGER/ SERVICE ELEV. #2 FRONT OPENING SCHINDLER 3300 2500 #150 FPM PASSENGER A202 2 ELEV. #1ELEV. #2 4 A301 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D 2 A301 1 A302 1 A302 1 A301 1 A301 2 A304 198' - 8"63' - 10"21' - 4 3/4"22' - 0 1/2"20' - 4 3/4"5 A303 3 A3011.4 8.1 8.5 7.7 A.6 B.1 4 A303 1 A303 A405 6 A310 1 034003002 033001 A307 1 A307 8 SOUTHSOUTHSOUTHSOUTH STAIRSTAIRSTAIRSTAIR 133 NORTHNORTHNORTHNORTH STAIRSTAIRSTAIRSTAIR 134 MECHANICALMECHANICALMECHANICALMECHANICAL 003 PARKINGPARKINGPARKINGPARKING 001 ELEVATORELEVATORELEVATORELEVATOR LOBBYLOBBYLOBBYLOBBY 002 TWO BICYCLE PARKING STALLS IN PARKING GARAGE AREA - --- SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" FIRST FLOOR1DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:© Copyright 2016 - Cities Edge, LLC. - All rights reservedSHEET NUMBER This document contains confidential or proprietary information of Cities Edge, LLC. Neither this document nor the information herein is to be reproduced, distributed, used or disclosed either in whole or in part except as authorized by Cities Edge, LLC.PROJECT NUMBER SHEET TITLE: PROJECT TITLE: ISSUE PHASE DATE ISSUED PROJECT OWNER: PROJECT LOCATION: Certification & Seal:Certification & Seal:Certification & Seal:Certification & Seal:C:\Users\jzetah\Documents\30906 - ARH - AC Hotel - SLP,MN - Central File_jzetah.rvt2/26/2016 12:08:38 PM30906JEZJRM A101 AC HOTEL BY MARRIOTT PARKING GARAGE LEVEL, FIRST FLOOR PLAN 03-22-2016 ACSLP, L.L.C. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS GOLDEN VALLEY/ ST. LOUIS PARK, MN NORTH SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" PARKING LEVEL2 Revision Date FIRST FLOOR 100' - 0" SECOND FLOOR 115' - 0" THIRD FLOOR 126' - 4" BTM. OF PLANK 172' - 4" FOURTH FLOOR 137' - 8" T.O. HIGH PARAPET 183' - 2" FIFTH FLOOR 149' - 0" SIXTH FLOOR 161' - 0" 1 A308 2 A308 15' - 0"11' - 4"11' - 4"11' - 4"12' - 0"11' - 4"10' - 10"83' - 2"123456789 2 A301 1 A3015 A303 3 A301 LED STRIP LIGHTING UNDER PERIMETER OF HIGH PARAPET, NORTH, EAST AND WEST SIDES (TYPE LEDRGB #MX4) 1.48.18.5 7.7 T.O. LOW PARAPET 176' - 4" LED STRIP LIGHTING UNDER FULL PERIMETER OF LOW PARAPET (TYPE LEDRGB #MX4) 4 A303 1 A303 3 A704 2 A702 STUCCO #2 - COLOR: LATTICE NICHIHA FIBERCEMENT PANEL #1 - COLOR: GAUNTLET GRAY STUCCO #1 - COLOR: DORIAN GRAY MANUFACTURED STONE - CORONADO STONE IN COLOSEUM TRAVERTINE (ROMAN) 16"x24" CURTAIN WALL SPANDREL GLASS NICHIHA FIBERCEMENT PANEL #2 - COLOR: CAVIAR PERFORATED METAL PANEL W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 W1W1W1W1W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 W1W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 W1W1W1W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 W1W1W1W1W1W1W1 W1W1W1W1W1W1 W4 W4 W4W4 W1 W1 W1W1 W1W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 118117C NICHIHA FIBERCEMENT PANEL #1 @ PARAPET - COLOR: GAUNTLET GRAY FIRST FLOOR 100' - 0" SECOND FLOOR 115' - 0" THIRD FLOOR 126' - 4" BTM. OF PLANK 172' - 4" FOURTH FLOOR 137' - 8" T.O. HIGH PARAPET 183' - 2" FIFTH FLOOR 149' - 0" SIXTH FLOOR 161' - 0" 2 A302 10' - 10"11' - 4"12' - 0"11' - 4"11' - 4"11' - 4"15' - 0"83' - 2"4 A301 ABCD 1 A302 11' - 6"11' - 6"2 A304 LED STRIP LIGHTING UNDER PERIMETER OF HIGH PARAPET, NORTH, EAST AND WEST SIDES (TYPE LEDRGB #MX4) A.6B.1 T.O. LOW PARAPET 176' - 4" NICHIHA FIBER CEMENT PANELS #2 - COLOR: CAVIAR PERFORATED METAL PANEL NICHIHA FIBER CEMENT PANELS #1 - COLOR: GAUNTLET GRAY SPANDREL GLASS CURTAIN WALL ILLUMINATED SIGN NICHIHA FIBER CEMENT PANELS #1 @ PARAPET - COLOR: GAUNTLET GRAY STUCCO COLOR #1 - COLOR TO MATCH (SW7017 - DORIAN GRAY) STUCCO COLOR #2 - COLOR TO MATCH (SW7654 - LATTICE) STUCCO COLOR #3 - COLOR TO MATCH (SW6990 - CAVIAR) NICHIHA PANELS #1 - ILLUMINATION SERIES COLOR TO MATCH (SW7019 - GAUNTLET GRAY) NICHIHA PANELS #2 - ILLUMINATION SERIES COLOR TO MATCH (SW6990 - CAVIAR) MANUFACTURED STONE - CORONADO STONE - COLOSEUM TRAVERTINE (ROMAN) 16"x24" PERFORATED METAL PANEL SPANDREL GLASS EXTERIOR MATERIALS LEGEND STUCCO - DO NOT EXCEED 144 SF BETWEEN CONTROL JOINTS. THE DISTANCE BETWEEN CONTROL JOINTS SHOULD NOT EXCEED 18 FEET INEITHER DIRECTION WITH A LENGTH TO WIDTH RATIO OF 2.5 TO 1. B C (EXPANSION JT. - E.J.)(REVEAL) 1/2" SHEATHING JOINT3/4"1 1/2"1 1/2"1"3/4"3/4" 1" MIN.1/2"1"A (CONTROL JT. - C.J.) METAL LATHE CONTROL JOINT 3/4"1 1/2" 1" MIN.1/2"1"EIFS JOINTS/REVEAL: SEE ELEVATIONS FOR JOINT/REVEAL LOCATIONS 3/8"BACKER ROD & SEALANT (TYP.) EXTERIOR ELEVATION NOTES 1.ALL EXTERIOR VENTS & LOUVERS TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH ADJACENT WALL COLOR. SEE MECHANICAL FOR SIZE AND LOCATIONS 2.FOAM PLASTIC INSULATION GREATER THAN 4" IN THICKNESS SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM FLAME SPREAD INDEX OF 75 AND A SMOKE DEVELOPED INDEX OF 450 WHERE TESTED AT A MINIMUM THICKNESS OF 4" 3.PROVIDE BLOCKING AND ELECTRICAL CIRCUITING TOO ALL SIGN LOCATIONS; COORDINATE WITH SIGN CONTRACTOR. 4.EIFS NOT TO EXCEED 144 SQ. FT. W/O CONTROL JOINT. SEE DETAILS FOR CONTROL AND EXPANSION JOINTS SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" WEST1 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" NORTH2DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:© Copyright 2016 - Cities Edge, LLC. - All rights reservedSHEET NUMBER This document contains confidential or proprietary information of Cities Edge, LLC. Neither this document nor the information herein is to be reproduced, distributed, used or disclosed either in whole or in part except as authorized by Cities Edge, LLC.PROJECT NUMBER SHEET TITLE: PROJECT TITLE: ISSUE PHASE DATE ISSUED PROJECT OWNER: PROJECT LOCATION: Certification & Seal:Certification & Seal:Certification & Seal:Certification & Seal:C:\Users\jzetah\Documents\30906 - ARH - AC Hotel - SLP,MN - Central File_jzetah.rvt2/26/2016 12:12:05 PM30906JEZJRM A201 AC HOTEL BY MARRIOTT EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 03-22-2016 ACSLP, L.L.C. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS GOLDEN VALLEY/ ST. LOUIS PARK, MN SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0" EIFS JOINTS SCALE: 12" = 1'-0" EXTERIOR ELEVATION NOTES NORTH ELEVATION MATERIAL SQUARE FOOTAGES CLASS 1 MATERIALS: (77.1%) CURTAIN WALL 4,107 SF STUCCO #1 0 SF STUCCO #2 0 SF WINDOWS 0 SF CLASS 1I MATERIALS: (22.9%) STONE 0 SF NICHIHA 1,218 SF WEST ELEVATION MATERIAL SQUARE FOOTAGES CLASS 1 MATERIALS: (72.9%) CURTAIN WALL 1,672 SF STUCCO #1 5,368 SF STUCCO #2 1,254 SF WINDOWS 2,652 SF CLASS II MATERIALS: (27.1%) STONE 2,084 SF NICHIHA 1,984 SF Revision Date FIRST FLOOR 100' - 0" SECOND FLOOR 115' - 0" THIRD FLOOR 126' - 4" BTM. OF PLANK 172' - 4" FOURTH FLOOR 137' - 8" T.O. HIGH PARAPET 183' - 2" FIFTH FLOOR 149' - 0" SIXTH FLOOR 161' - 0"83' - 2"10' - 10"11' - 4"12' - 0"11' - 4"11' - 4"11' - 4"15' - 0"9' - 10"1' - 6"3' - 0"9' - 0"11' - 4"11' - 4"11' - 4"11' - 4"12' - 0"11' - 4"11' - 4"11' - 4"15' - 0"11' - 4"3' - 1 1/4"8' - 10 3/4"2' - 5 1/4"8' - 10 3/4"2' - 5 1/4"8' - 10 3/4"2' - 5 1/4"8' - 10 3/4"5' - 1 1/4"9' - 10 3/4"1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2 A301 1 A301 11' - 6"11' - 6"19' - 3 161/256"1' - 4"5 A303 3 A301 LED DOWNLIGHT (TYPE XDE) @ UNDERSIDE OF SUNSHADES & PORTE COCHERE LED STRIP LIGHTING UNDER PERIMETER OF HIGH PARAPET, NORTH, EAST AND WEST SIDES (TYPE LEDRGB #MX4) BUILDING ACCENT UP/DOWN LIGHTING (TYPE XUD) 1.4 8.1 8.57.7 T.O. LOW PARAPET 176' - 4" LED STRIP LIGHTING UNDER FULL PERIMETER OF LOW PARAPET (TYPE LEDRGB #MX4) 4 A303 A202 3 1 A303 ILLUMINATED SIGN NICHIHA FIBERCEMENT PANELS #2 - COLOR: CAVIAR PERFORATED METAL PANEL SPANDREL GLASS CURTAIN WALL NICHIHA FIBERCEMENT PANELS #1 - COLOR: GAUNTLET GRAY MANUFACTURED STONE - CORONADO STONE - COLOSEUM TRAVERTINE (ROMAN) 16"x24" NICHIHA FIBER CEMENT PANELS #1 @ PARAPET - COLOR: GAUNTLET GRAY NICHIHA FIBER CEMENT PANELS #1 - COLOR: GAUNTLET GRAY SPANDREL GLASS STUCCO #1 - COLOR: DORIAN GRAY CURTAIN WALL STUCCO #2 - COLOR: LATTICE GLASS RAILING W2 W4A W4 W3 101A126A 101C101B W1 613A 611A W1W1W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 W1W1W1W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 112A FIRST FLOOR 100' - 0" SECOND FLOOR 115' - 0" THIRD FLOOR 126' - 4" BTM. OF PLANK 172' - 4" FOURTH FLOOR 137' - 8" T.O. HIGH PARAPET 183' - 2" FIFTH FLOOR 149' - 0" SIXTH FLOOR 161' - 0" PARKING LEVEL 90' - 0" 2 A302 83' - 2"10' - 0"10' - 10"11' - 4"12' - 0"11' - 4"11' - 4"11' - 4"15' - 0"4 A301 A B C D 1 A302 T.O. LOW PARAPET 176' - 4" LED STRIP LIGHTING UNDER FULL PERIMETER OF LOW PARAPET (TYPE LEDRGB #MX4) STUCCO #1 - COLOR: DORIAN GRAY STUCCO #1 - COLOR: DORIAN GRAY STUCCO #2 - COLOR: LATTICE NICHIHA FIBER CEMENT PANELS # 1 - COLOR: GAUNTLET GRAY NICHIHA FIBER CEMENT PANELS #1 @ HIGH PARAPET BEYOND - COLOR: GAUNTLET GRAY W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 132A 133A 001 STUCCO COLOR #1 - COLOR TO MATCH (SW7017 - DORIAN GRAY) STUCCO COLOR #2 - COLOR TO MATCH (SW7654 - LATTICE) STUCCO COLOR #3 - COLOR TO MATCH (SW6990 - CAVIAR) NICHIHA PANELS #1 - ILLUMINATION SERIES COLOR TO MATCH (SW7019 - GAUNTLET GRAY) NICHIHA PANELS #2 - ILLUMINATION SERIES COLOR TO MATCH (SW6990 - CAVIAR) MANUFACTURED STONE - CORONADO STONE - COLOSEUM TRAVERTINE (ROMAN) 16"x24" PERFORATED METAL PANEL SPANDREL GLASS EXTERIOR MATERIALS LEGEND STUCCO - DO NOT EXCEED 144 SF BETWEEN CONTROL JOINTS. THE DISTANCE BETWEEN CONTROL JOINTS SHOULD NOT EXCEED 18 FEET INEITHER DIRECTION WITH A LENGTH TO WIDTH RATIO OF 2.5 TO 1. 2' - 0"2' - 8"MCNICHOLS 3/4" ROUND ON 1" PERF. ALUM. AC HOTELS SIGNAGE OVER PERF. ALUM. PANELDRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:© Copyright 2016 - Cities Edge, LLC. - All rights reservedSHEET NUMBER This document contains confidential or proprietary information of Cities Edge, LLC. Neither this document nor the information herein is to be reproduced, distributed, used or disclosed either in whole or in part except as authorized by Cities Edge, LLC.PROJECT NUMBER SHEET TITLE: PROJECT TITLE: ISSUE PHASE DATE ISSUED PROJECT OWNER: PROJECT LOCATION: Certification & Seal:Certification & Seal:Certification & Seal:Certification & Seal:C:\Users\jzetah\Documents\30906 - ARH - AC Hotel - SLP,MN - Central File_jzetah.rvt2/26/2016 12:13:35 PM30906JEZJRM A202 AC HOTEL BY MARRIOTT EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 03-22-2016 ACSLP, L.L.C. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS GOLDEN VALLEY/ ST. LOUIS PARK, MN SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" EAST1 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" SOUTH2 EAST ELEVATION MATERIAL SQUARE FOOTAGES CLASS 1 MATERIALS: 69.2%) CURTAIN WALL 8,646 SF STUCCO #1 669 SF STUCCO #2 0 SF WINDOWS 1,325 SF CLASS II MATERIALS: (30.8 %) STONE 2,093 SF NICHIHA 2,634 SF SOUTH ELEVATION MATERIAL SQUARE FOOTAGES CLASS I MATERIALS: (88.6%) CURTAIN WALL 0 SF STUCCO #1 3,487 SF STUCCO #2 595 SF WINDOWS 210 SF CLASS II MATERIALS: (11.4%) STONE 0 SF NICHIHA 526 SF SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" AC ENTRY SIGN DETAIL3 Revision Date DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:© Copyright 2016 - Cities Edge, LLC. - All rights reservedSHEET NUMBER This document contains confidential or proprietary information of Cities Edge, LLC. Neither this document nor the information herein is to be reproduced, distributed, used or disclosed either in whole or in part except as authorized by Cities Edge, LLC.PROJECT NUMBER SHEET TITLE: PROJECT TITLE: ISSUE PHASE DATE ISSUED PROJECT OWNER: PROJECT LOCATION: Certification & Seal:Certification & Seal:Certification & Seal:Certification & Seal:C:\Users\jzetah\Documents\30906 - ARH - AC Hotel - SLP,MN - Central File_jzetah.rvt2/26/2016 12:17:20 PM30906JEZJRM A901 AC HOTEL BY MARRIOTT 3D VIEWS 03-22-2016 ACSLP, L.L.C. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS GOLDEN VALLEY/ ST. LOUIS PARK, MN SCALE: NE 3D View1 SCALE: SW 3D View2 Revision Date STMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMx STMx STMx STMx STM x STM x S TM x S TM x S TM xS TM x S TM x S T M x S T M x S T M x ST M x ST M x ST M x ST M x ST M x STM x STM x STM x STM x STM x STM x STMx STMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMx Wx Wx Wx Wx Wx SSx SSx SSx SSx SSGxGxGxGxGxGxGxGxGxExExExExExExExExExSTMxSTMxS ST. LOUIS PARKGOLDEN VALLEY1stampdescriptiondatesheet numbertitlecolberg|tews3101 East Franklin Avenue | Minneapolis, MN 55406www.colbergtews.comAC Hotel by Marriott St. Louis Park, MN D R A F TCITY SUBMITTAL1-4-2016I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me orunder my direct supervision and that I am a dulyregistered landscape architect in the State of Minnesota.signaturenamedatereg. no.GARRETT A. TEWS 48408 1/4/2016CITY SUBMITTAL1-25-2016TREE INVENTORYL 0000 10'20'NORTH40'1. NO SIGNIFICANT OR SPECIMEN TREES EXIST ON THE ST. LOUIS PARKPORTION OF THE SITE THEREFORE NO MITIGATION IS REQUIRED.2. SEE L001 FOR TREE PLANTING PLAN.3. SEE L100 FOR OVERALL PLANTING PLAN.NOTES S T M STM STM S TM S TM S TM S TM S TM S TM S TMSTMSTM STMSTMSTMSTMSTMSAN SAN SAN WWWWWSTMSTMSTMSTMSTMSTMSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMx STMx STMx STMx STM x STM x S TM x S TM x S TM xS TM x S TM x S T M x S T M x S T M x ST M x ST M x ST M x ST M x ST M x STM x STM x STM x STM x STM x STM x STMx STMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMx Wx Wx Wx Wx Wx SSx SSx SSx SSx SSGxGxGxGxGxGxGxGxGxExExExExExExExExExSTMxSTMxS ST. LOUIS PARKGOLDEN VALLEYAF3QE2AF4JV3GT1GT1GT1GT1GT1PROPOSED AC HOTELQE1QE1stampdescriptiondatesheet numbertitlecolberg|tews3101 East Franklin Avenue | Minneapolis, MN 55406www.colbergtews.comAC Hotel by Marriott St. Louis Park, MN D R A F TCITY SUBMITTAL1-4-2016I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me orunder my direct supervision and that I am a dulyregistered landscape architect in the State of Minnesota.signaturenamedatereg. no.GARRETT A. TEWS 48408 1/4/2016CITY SUBMITTAL1-25-2016TREE MITIGATION PLANL 0010 10'20'NORTH40'1. NO SIGNIFICANT OR SPECIMEN TREES EXIST ON THE ST. LOUIS PARKPORTION OF THE SITE THEREFORE NO MITIGATION IS REQUIRED.2. SEE L000 FOR TREE INVENTORY.3. SEE L100 FOR OVERALL LANDCAPE PLAN.NOTESL001 TREE MITIGATION SCHEDULETAGQTYCOMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SIZE NOTESTREESAF 7SIENNA GLENMAPLEACER X FREMANII 'SIENNA'3"B+BSTRAIGHTLEADERBP16WHITESPIREBIRCHBETULA POPULIFOLIA'WHITESPIRE'3"B+BSINGLESTEMGT5NORTHERNACCLAIMHONEYLOCUSTGLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS'HARVE'3"B+BSTRAIGHTLEADERJV9EASTERN REDCEDARJUNIPERUS VIRGINIANA6'B+B--QA22CRIMSON SPIREOAKQUERCUS ALBA XQUERCUS ROBUR3"B+BSTRAIGHTLEADERQE4NORTHERN PINOAKQUERCUS ELLIPSOIDALIS3"B+BSTRAIGHTLEADER S T M STM STM S TM S TM S TM S TM S TM S TM S TMSTMSTM STMSTMSTMSTMSTMSAN SAN SAN WWWWSTMSTMSTMSTMSTMSTMWWSTMx STMx STMx STMx STMx STM x STM x STM x STM x STM x S T M x S T M x S T M x S T M x ST M x ST M x ST M x ST M x ST M x STM x STM x STM x STM x STM x STM x STMx STMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMx Wx Wx Wx Wx Wx SSx SSx SSx SSx SSGxGxGxGxGxGxGxGxGxExExExExExExExExExSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxSTMxS ST. LOUIS PARKGOLDEN VALLEYCS9JV26EP8SH139RO26RG16SA10RG5SH11AF3HS29EP10SH50RG9DL3SS193SS48SS62JS33JS8QE2AF4JV3JS14HS23AM60HR18SA29HR18HS70GT1GT1GT1GT1GT1RO7SODSODPROPOSED AC HOTELTCD28QE1QE1JS9SH55SH27RG48RG13SH13stampdescriptiondatesheet numbertitlecolberg|tews3101 East Franklin Avenue | Minneapolis, MN 55406www.colbergtews.comAC Hotel by Marriott St. Louis Park, MN D R A F TCITY SUBMITTAL1-4-2016I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me orunder my direct supervision and that I am a dulyregistered landscape architect in the State of Minnesota.signaturenamedatereg. no.GARRETT A. TEWS 48408 1/4/2016CITY SUBMITTAL (rev. 1)1-25-2016CITY SUBMITTAL (rev. 2)1-28-2016CITY SUBMITTAL (rev. 3)2-25-2016LANDSCAPE PLANL 1000 10'20'NORTH40'1. SEE L101 FOR PLANTING NOTES & DETAILS.2. SEE L000 FOR TREE INVENTORY PLAN.3. SEE L001 FOR TREE MITIGATION PLAN.NOTESL100 PLANTING SCHEDULETAGQTYCOMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SIZE NOTESTREESAF 7SIENNA GLENMAPLEACER X FREMANII 'SIENNA'3"B+BSTRAIGHTLEADERBP 13WHITESPIREBIRCHBETULA POPULIFOLIA'WHITESPIRE'3"B+BSINGLESTEMGT5NORTHERNACCLAIMHONEYLOCUSTGLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS'HARVE'3"B+BSTRAIGHTLEADERJV 9EASTERN REDCEDARJUNIPERUS VIRGINIANA6'B+B--QA22CRIMSON SPIREOAKQUERCUS ALBA XQUERCUS ROBUR3"B+BSTRAIGHTLEADERQE4NORTHERN PINOAKQUERCUS ELLIPSOIDALIS3"B+BSTRAIGHTLEADERSHRUBSAM 60IROQUOIS BEAUTYCHOKEBERRYARONIA MELANOCARPA'MORTON'5GAL--CS15ARCTIC FIREDOGWOODCORNUS SERICEA'FARROW'5GAL--DL64DWARF BUSHHONEYSUCKLEDIERVILLA LONICERA5GAL--JS64JUNIPER'ARCADIA'JUNIPERUS SABINA'ARCADIA'5GAL--JSC20JUNIPER 'MEDORA'JUNIPERUS SCOPULORUM'MEDORA'10GAL--JV2 69GREY OWLJUNIPERJUNIPERUS VIRGINANA'GREY OWL'5GAL--RA75GRO-LOW SUMACRHUS AROMATICA'GRO-LOW'5GAL--RO76CAREFREEDELIGHT ROSEROSA 'CAREFREEDELIGHT'5GAL--TCD 28DWARF BRIGHTGOLD YEWTAXUS CUSPIDATA'DWARF BRIGHT GOLD'5GAL--PERENNIALSEP 18PURPLECONEFLOWERECHINACEA PURPUREA'POWWOW WILD BERRY'1GAL--HR 36RUBY STELLADAYLILYHEMEROCALLIS 'RUBYSTELLA'1GAL--HS 223SAPPHIRE BLUEOAT GRASSHELICTOTRICHONSEMPERVIRENS'SAPPHIRE'1GAL--RG98GOLDSTURMRUDBECKIARUDBECKIA 'GOLDSTURM'1GAL--SA67AUTUMN FIRESEDUMSEDUM X 'AUTUMN FIRE'1GAL--SS 373LITTLE BLUESTEM'BLUE HEAVEN'SCHYZACHYRIUMSCOPARIUM 'MINNBLUE A'1GAL--SH 338PRAIRIEDROPSEEDSPOROBOLUSHETEROLEPIS1GAL-- 12" MIN.4" MIN.SEE PLANSPACING --PULL MULCH AWAY FROM ALL STEMSTO PREVENT ROTTING2" SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCHFINISH GRADE - PLACE PLANTTO BEAR SAME RELATIONSHIPTO GRADE AS IN PRIOR GROWINGCONDITIONAMEND EXISTING SOIL WITH ORGANICMATTER & PEAT MOSS. INCORPORATESLOW RELEASE FERTILIZER & MIXTHOROUGHLY.SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OFHOLE PRIOR TO PLANTINGCOMPACTED SETTINGBED - USE PLANTINGSOILUNDISTURBED SOIL ORCOMPACTED SUBGRADE12" MIN.AMENDED SOILCOMPACTED SUBGRADEUNDISTURBED SOIL ORIN PRIOR GROWING CONDITION.SAME RELATIONSHIP TO GRADE ASPRUNE TRIM BROKEN & DEAD STEMS ONLY.3" SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCHCOMPACTED SETTING BED- USESCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OFHOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING.FINISH GRADE - PLACE PLANT TO BEAR6"12"PULL MULCH AWAY FROM ALL STEMS TOPREVENT ROTTINGAMEND EXISTING SOIL WITH ORGANICMATTER & PEAT MOSS. INCORPORATESLOW RELEASE FERTILIZER & MIXTHOROUGHLY.PERMALOC 'CLEANLINE' 3/16" x 5-1/2" ALUMINUMEDGING OR APPROVED EQUAL INSTALLED PERMANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS. MILL FINISH.TURF, SEE PLAN.PLANTING BED, SEE PLAN.STAKING:GUY ASSEMBLY: 16" POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE (40 MIL) 1-1/2"WIDE STRIP- (TYP.) DOUBLE STRAND 14 GA WIRE & 3 STEEL STAKES OR SIGNPOSTS @ 120 DEG. O.C. (SEE STAKING DIAGRAM) GUY ASSEMBLY OPTIONALBUT CONTRACTOR ASSUMES FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR MAINTAINING TREEIN A PLUMB POSITION FOR THE DURAION OF THE GUARANTEE PERIOD.COORDINATE STAKING TO INSURE UNIFORM ORIENTATION OF GUY LINESAND STAKES.STAKING DIAGRAM120 DEG.4' MIN.MIX THOROUGHLY. SEE SPEC.BACKFILL WITH 1/2 NATIVE SOILS AND 1/2 PLANTING SOIL.5' DIAMETER AROUND TREE. PULL AWAY FROM TRUNK OF TREESHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH - 4" DEPTH FOR120 DEG.120 DEG.NOTE:CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE WITH PIN THE ROOT FLARE OF EACH TREE PRIOR TO PLACING TREE IN PLANTING PIT. (THEFLARE IS WHERE THE FIRST HORIZONTAL ROOT COMES OUT FROM THE TREE). THE PLANTING DEPTH OF EACH TREEWILL BE INSPECTED. ANY TREE PLANTED TOO DEEPLY OR WITH FLARE BURIED WILL BE REJECTED.REMOVE SOIL FROM TOP OF ROOTBALL TO EXPOSE TOP OF FLARE (SOMETIMES AS MUCH AS HALF THE ROOTBALL).SET TREE IN PIT SO THAT FLARE IS ONE-TWO INCHES ABOVE SURROUNDING GRADE.IN ALL AREAS WITH HEAVY CLAY OR POORLY DRAINED SOILS (MOTTLING), CONTACT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TOPOSSIBLY RELOCATE TREE OR TO CONFIRM ELEVATED ROOTBALL. IN HEAVY SOILS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SETTHE FLARE OF THE TREE 2"-3" ABOVE GRADE.AFTER SETTING ROOT BALL IN PIT, BACKFILL TO WITHIN 12"OF TOP OF ROOTBALL AND WATER.CUT AND REMOVE TO BACKFILL LINE ALL TWINE, WIREAND/OR BURLAP.BACKFILL UNTIL PIT IS FULL, WATER AGAIN.PULL EXCESS SOIL OFF THE TOP OF BRANCH ROOT SYSTEMS.IF SOIL IN ROOT BALL IS THE CONSISTENCY OF OATMEAL DUETO EXCESSIVE HANDLING, CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE THETREE.STAKES AND GUY WIRESMANDATORY ONLY FORB&B TREES WITH 4" CALIPEROR GREATER AND ALL BAREROOT TREES OR AS NOTEDAFTER INSTALLATION, TRIM OUTDEADWOOD AND/OR DEFORMEDTWIGS. DO NOT CUT LEADER.UNDISTURBED SOIL ORCOMPACTED SUBGRADESCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OFHOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING.PLANTING HOLE TO BE 2' LARGERTHAN ROOTBALL.FLARE, SEE NOTEstampdescriptiondatesheet numbertitlecolberg|tews3101 East Franklin Avenue | Minneapolis, MN 55406www.colbergtews.comAC Hotel by Marriott St. Louis Park, MN D R A F TCITY SUBMITTAL1-4-2016I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me orunder my direct supervision and that I am a dulyregistered landscape architect in the State of Minnesota.signaturenamedatereg. no.GARRETT A. TEWS 48408 1/4/2016CITY SUBMITTAL1-25-2016LANDSCAPE DETAILS &NOTESL 101PLANTING NOTES1. ALL PROPOSED PLANTS SHALL BE STAKED AS SHOWN ON THEDRAWINGS AND/OR AS DIRECTED IN THE FIELD BY THE LANDSCAPEARCHITECT. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST APPROVE ALLSTAKING LOCATIONS OF PLANT MATERIALS PRIOR TO ANY DIGGING.LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHALL BE NOTIFIED AT LEAST 48 HOURS INADVANCE OF THE DELIVERY DATE FOR ALL PLANT MATERIALS.2. EXISTING TREES INDICATED ON PLAN TO REMAIN. PROTECT FROMDAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION. ALL TREES OUTSIDE OF WORK LIMITTO REMAIN UNLESS DAMAGED OR DISEASED. NOTIFY LANDSCAPEARCHITECT OF ANY ADDITIONAL TREES REQUIRING REMOVAL. SEEARCH. FOR LANDSCAPE DEMO AND TREE REMOVAL.3. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RESTORED TO TURF VIA SOD UNLESSOTHERWISE SPECIFIED.4. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE WARRANTED BY THE CONTRACTORFOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR AFTER THE OWNER'S WRITTENACCEPTANCE. ANY ACTS OF VANDALISM OR DAMAGE WHICH MAYOCCUR PRIOR TO THE OWNER'S WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE SHALL BE THERESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR.5. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST APPROVE THE DECOMPACTEDSUBGRADE AFTER DECOMPACTION WORK IS COMPLETE AND PRIOR TOTOPSOIL PLACEMENT.6. PROVIDE 4 INCHES OF TOPSOIL FOR ALL SOD AREAS AND 6 INCHES OFTOPSOIL FOR ALL SEEDED AREAS. PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 12 INCHESOF PLANTING SOIL MIX CONSISTING OF 1/3 TOPSOIL, 1/3 SAND, AND 1/3ORGANIC COMPOST IN ALL SHRUB AND PERENNIAL BEDS. WHERESHRUBS OR PERENNIALS ARE GROUPED, CREATE ONE CONTINUOUSPLANTING BED. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST APPROVE SOIL MIXTUREPRIOR TO SPREADING. CONTRACTOR MUST SUBMIT TESTING RESULTSAND FERTILIZER RECOMMENDATIONS FOR REVIEW PRIOR TOAPPROVAL.7. ALL EDGED SHRUB PLANTING BEDS TO RECEIVE UNCOLORED 3 INCHDEPTH OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARK MULCH. LANDSCAPEARCHITECT TO APPROVE MULCH PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.8. ALL PLANTING BEDS NOT CONTAINED BY STRUCTURES, CURB, ORPAVING MUST BE EDGED WITH METAL LANDSCAPE EDGING. PERMALOC'CLEANLINE' 4" X 38", BLACK ANODIZED FINISH, OR APPROVED EQUAL.9. WHERE SOD ABUTS PAVED SURFACES, FINISHED GRADE OF SOD MUSTBE HELD 1 INCH BELOW THE SURFACE ELEVATION OF THE PAVEDSURFACE.10. SOD SHALL BE LAID PARALLEL TO THE CONTOURS AND SHALL HAVESTAGGERED JOINTS.11. ADJUSTMENT IN LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLANT MATERIAL MAY BENEEDED IN THE FIELD. SHOULD AN ADJUSTMENT BE ADVISED, THELANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST BE NOTIFIED FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TOADJUSTMENT.12. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED (COMMON ORLATIN NOMENCLATURE) WITH A PLASTIC TAG PROVIDED BY NURSERYOR PLANT SOURCE WHICH SHALL NOT BE REMOVED PRIOR TO THELANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S APPROVAL.13. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE FERTILIZED UPON INSTALLATION WITHDRIED BONE MEAL OR OTHER FERTILIZER AS INDICATED MIXED IN WITHTHE PLANTING SOIL PER MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS.14. ALL PLANT MATERIALS ARE TO BE INSTALLED PER PLANTING DETAILS.15. WRAP ALL DECIDUOUS TREES FROM THE GROUND TO THE FIRSTBRANCH FOR WINTER. WRAPPING MATERIAL SHALL BE QUALITY, HEAVYWATERPROOF CREPE PAPER MANUFACTURED EXPRESSLY FOR THISPURPOSE. WRAP ALL DECIDUOUS TREES PLANTED IN THE FALL PRIORTO DECEMBER 1ST, AND REMOVE ALL WRAPPING BETWEEN MAY 1STAND JUNE 1ST, OR AS INSTRUCTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.16. IF THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR PERCEIVES ANY DEFICIENCIES INTHE PLANT SELECTIONS, SOIL CONDITIONS, OR ANY OTHER SITECONDITIONS WHICH MIGHT NEGATIVELY AFFECT PLANT MATERIALESTABLISHMENT, SURVIVAL, OR GUARANTEE, THE LANDSCAPECONTRACTOR SHALL BRING THESE DEFICIENCIES TO THE ATTENTIONOF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.17. ALL SINGLE STEM TREES SHALL BE STOCK THAT WAS GROWNEXPRESSLY AS SUCH. MULTIPLE STEM STOCK WITH STEMS REMOVEDWILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.18. NO PLANT MATERIAL SUBSTITUTIONS WILL BE ACCEPTED UNLESSAPPROVAL IS REQUESTED OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BY THELANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF A BID AND/ORQUOTATION.19. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A WRITTEN REQUEST FOR THE OWNERACCEPTANCE INSPECTION UPON COMPLETION OF ALL PLANTINGWORK.1. SEE L100 FOR LANDSCAPE PLAN.2. SEE L000 FOR TREE INVENTORY PLAN.3. SEE L001 FOR TREE PROTECTION & REMOVAL PLAN.DRAWING NOTES1PLANTING DETAILSNOT TO SCALEPERENNIAL PLANTINGSHRUB PLANTINGTREE PLANTINGLANDSCAPE EDGING CENTRAL PARK WESTST. LOUIS PARK/GOLDEN VALLEY, MNDLC RESIDENTIAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A B C D E F G H I K PH-3CENTRAL PARKWESTPHASE 3 PLAN LEGEND CITY PROPERTY LINE / ROW LOT LINE PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER EXISTING BUILDING PHASING LEGEND PHASE III - HOTEL SPRING 2016 - FALL 2017 (EXACT TIMING OF DEVELOPMENT MAY VARY DEPENDING ON MARKET CONDITIONS) DESCRIPTION OF PHASE III WORK: -CONSTRUCT HOTEL PARKING AREAS AND BUILDING -TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION PARKING SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN THE PROJECT SITE, OUTSIDE OF CONSTRUCTION AREA. -SNOW SHALL BE PLACED ON VACANT LOT TO SOUTH -TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION STAGING AREAS SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN PROJECT SITE, OUTSIDE OF CONSTRUCTION AREA. -TEMPORARY HOTEL OVERFLOW PARKING WILL BE ACCOUNTED FOR ON THE VACANT AREA ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RESIDENTIAL PHASE 1. IF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT OCCURS SIMULTANEOUSLY THEN TEMPORARY OVERFLOW PARKING WILL BE SHARED WITH RESIDENTIAL PHASE 1 AND OLIVE GARDEN (FUTURE RESIDENTIAL) LOTS. CENTRAL PARK WESTST. LOUIS PARK/GOLDEN VALLEY, MNDLC RESIDENTIAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A B C D E F G H I K DESIGNED OUTDOOR RECREATION AREA (DORA) LEGENDWEST END SITE DATA TABLE OUTLOT A - OFFICE BUILDINGS 6.90 ACRES LOT 1 - PHASE 1 RESIDENTIAL 3.46 ACRES LOT 2 - PHASE 2 RESIDENTIAL 1.53 ACRES LOT 3 - HOTEL 1.61 ACRES TOTAL 13.49 ACRES EX.1DORA AREACALCULATIONEXHIBITPROPOSED DORA AREAS BUILDINGS OUTLOT A - OFFICE BUILDINGS 706,706 SF LOT 1 - PHASE 1 RESIDENTIAL 212,396 SF LOT 2 - PHASE 2 RESIDENTIAL 172,586 SF LOT 3 - HOTEL 84,816 SF TOTAL PROPOSED 1,176,504 SF DORA CALCULATION TOTAL REQUIRED *117,940 SF = 2.71 AC. TOTAL PROVIDED (12.9%)151,977 SF = 3.49 AC. * TOTAL REQUIRED = 141,180 - 23,240 (12% GFA - 20% PUBLIC ART REDUCTION) City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4a) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance and Map Amendments for AC Hotel by Marriott Final PUD Page 24 AC St. Louis Park - Golden Valley, Parking Plan Based upon our experience with three existing hotels along the I-394 corridor, only our Golden Valley hotel has greater than a 1.0:1.0 guest room to parking stall ratio. In our 1.0:1.0 hotels we do not have any parking shortage issues. Therefore, we will have the attached plan on standby ready to go, however, we are extremely optimistic that we will not need to engage it with the exception of ALL employees parking at the remote lot, that will be instituted from day one. We have an already established shuttle service that currently services the Homewood Suites St. Louis Park and the Holiday Inn Express Golden Valley. Our fleet consists of a combination of Vans and Buses which will be used as needed to shuttle guests to and from our offsite parking as needed. Key points: · All employees will be required to use the offsite lot regardless of hotel occupancy. This will ensure all onsite parking is designated for hotel guests. · We will designate a vehicle from our fleet for shuttling services to offsite parking as the hotels occupancy reaches a level that offsite parking is needed and used. · We will be exploring the requirements for key members of our management team and our concierge staff to be able to provide valet service to the offsite parking location. We will have designated spaces and signage that can be used for staging valet service if valet service is needed. · All guests at check in will be given a parking notification sheet which reviews our service, location of offsite parking with map, notification of our concierge’s number so that shuttle service may be coordinated/scheduled. · Management staff will monitor onsite parking based upon occupancy and institute our offsite shuttle service and or valet service as the onsite lot reaches 85% full. · Employees will be shuttled based on weather conditions and for safety as needed. We will ensure that our guests have an excellent and quality experience while staying at the Marriott AC. We will make sure that parking challenges do not impact our guests stay negatively, their satisfaction is what is most important to us. Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 4, 2016 Consent Agenda Item: 4b EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments for Arlington Row Apartments East PUD RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to approve Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance creating Section 36-268-PUD 5 of the Zoning Code and amending the Zoning Map from R-3 Two Family Residence to Planned Unit Development (PUD) 5 for property on the 7700 block of Wayzata Boulevard, and approve the Summary Ordinance for publication. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Is the rezoning consistent with the Comprehensive Plan? SUMMARY: Approval would allow construction of a three story multi-family building that includes a total of 27 residential units for a density of 29.3 units per acres. The site plan includes a new sidewalk along 13th Lane, on-site storm water management, outdoor recreation areas, landscaping and raised vegetable gardens. The development also includes a surface parking lot. The rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Medium Density residential and the proposed use of the property. The City Council approved the first reading of the Ordinance on March 21, 2016. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: No financial assistance from the City is requested. The developer received a $581,000 grant from the Met Council to incorporate solar, geothermal and underground stormwater. As a recipient of this grant the developer has agreed to ensure that six of the total units between Arlington Row West and East remain affordable to households at 80% of the area median income (AMI) for a period of 15 years. VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a well-maintained and diverse housing stock. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance Ordinance Summary Zoning Map of Area of Interest Official Exhibits Prepared by: Julie Grove, Economic Development Specialist Reviewed by: Sean Walther, Planning & Zoning Supervisor Michele Schnitker, Deputy Community Development Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4b) Page 2 Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments for Arlington Row Apartments East PUD ORDINANCE NO. ____-16 ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ST. LOUIS PARK CITY CODE RELATING TO ZONING BY CREATING SECTION 36-268-PUD 5 AS A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE 7700 BLOCK OF WAYZATA BOULEVARD BETWEEN RHODE ISLAND AND PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK DOES ORDAIN: Findings Sec. 1. The City Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission (Case No. 16-02-S and 16-03-PUD) for amending the Zoning Ordinance to create a new Planned Unit Development (PUD) Zoning District. Sec. 2. The Comprehensive Plan designates this property as RM-Medium Density Residential. Sec. 3. The Zoning Map shall be amended by reclassifying the following described lands from R-3 Two-Family Residence to PUD 5. Lot 1, Block 1, Arlington Row Apartments East; Hennepin County, Minnesota; and to the center line of all adjacent right-of-way. Sec. 4. The St. Louis Park Ordinance Code, Section 36-268 is hereby amended to add the following Planned Unit Development Zoning District: Section 36-268-PUD 5. (a) Development Plan The site shall be developed, used and maintained in conformance with the following Final PUD signed Official Exhibits: 1. T1.1 – Title Sheet 2. AS1.3 – Architectural Site Plan 3. Sheet 1 - Survey 4. C1-1 – Existing Conditions/Survey 5. C1-2 – Preliminary Plat (existing conditions) 6. C1-3 – Preliminary Plat 7. C2-1 – Site Plan 8. C3-1 – Grading Plan 9. C3-2 – Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan 10. C4-1 – Sanitary & Watermain 11. C4-2 – Storm Sewer 12. C8-1 – Details 13. C8-2 – City Details 14. L1-1 – Landscape Plan 15. L2-1 – Tree Inventory Plan 16. A1.0 – First & Second Level Floor Plans City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4b) Page 3 Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments for Arlington Row Apartments East PUD 17. A1.1 – Level 3 Floor & Roof Plan 18. A3.0 – Exterior Elevations 19. A3.4 – Exterior Elevations 20. Site Lighting Photometric Plan 21. Final Plat 22. Zoning Map Amendment Exhibit The site shall also conform to the following requirements: (1) The property shall be developed with up to 27 multiple family dwelling units totaling no more than 43 bedrooms. (2) A total of forty three (43) off-street parking spaces shall be provided in a surface lot. (3) The maximum building height shall be 36.5 feet and three stories. (4) A minimum of 12 percent of the lot shall be developed as designed outdoor recreation area. (b) Permitted Uses (1) Multiple-family dwelling. (2) Parks/open space. (c) Accessory Uses Accessory uses are as follows: (1) Private garages and parking lots. (2) Private swimming pool in conformance with section 36-73. (3) Service and retail facilities intended for use of residents not to exceed ten percent of the gross floor area of the development. (4) Property management or rental office provided that it does not occupy more than ten percent of the gross floor area. (5) Gardening and other horticultural uses. (6) Solar panels as regulated by this Chapter. (7) Decorative landscape features including but not limited to fountains, arbors pools and pergolas (8) Home occupations complying with all of the following conditions: a. All material or equipment shall be stored within an enclosed structure. City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4b) Page 4 Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments for Arlington Row Apartments East PUD b. Operation of the home occupation is not apparent from the public right-of way. c. The activity does not involve warehousing, distribution, or retail sales of merchandise produced off the site. d. No person is employed at the residence who does not legally reside in the home except that a licensed group family day care facility may have one outside employee. e. No light or vibration originating from the business operation is discernible at the property line. f. Only equipment, machinery and materials which are normally found in the home are used in the conduct of the home occupation. g. No more than one nonilluminated wall sign limited to two square feet in area is used to identify the home occupation. h. Space within the dwelling devoted to the home occupation does not exceed one room or ten percent of the floor area, whichever is greater. i. No portion of the home occupation is permitted within any attached or detached accessory building. j. The structure housing the home occupation conforms to the building code. (9) No outdoor uses or storage allowed. (d) Special Performance Standards (1) All general zoning requirements not specifically addressed in this ordinance shall be met, including but not limited to: outdoor lighting, architectural design, landscaping, parking and screening requirements. (2) All trash handling and loading areas shall be screened from view by a masonry wall no taller than six feet in height and constructed out of a material compatible with the principal buildings. (3) Signs shall be allowed in conformance with the approved redevelopment plan or final PUD site plan and development agreement in accordance with this Chapter and the sign area and height regulations for the R-4 Multiple-Family Residence zoning district. Sec. 5. The contents of Planning Case File 16-02-S and 16-03-PUD are hereby entered into and made part of the public hearing record and the record of decision for this case. Sec. 6. This Ordinance shall take effect fifteen days after its publication. City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4b) Page 5 Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments for Arlington Row Apartments East PUD Public Hearing February 17,2016 First Reading March 21, 2016 Second Reading April 4, 2016 Date of Publication April 14, 2016 Date Ordinance takes effect April 29, 2016 Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council April 4, 2016 Thomas Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Approved as to Form and Execution: City Clerk City Attorney City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4b) Page 6 Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments for Arlington Row Apartments East PUD SUMMARY FOR PUBLICATION ORDINANCE NO.____-16 AN ORDINANCE CREATING A NEW PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICT 7700 Block of Wayzata Boulevard Between Rhode Island and Pennsylvania Avenue This ordinance states that the Zoning Map shall be amended from R-3 Two-Family Residence to PUD 5 and the Zoning Ordinance Code, Section-268 will be amended to add Section 36-268- PUD 5. This ordinance shall take effect 15 days after publication. Adopted by the City Council April 4, 2016 Jake Spano /s/ Mayor A copy of the full text of this ordinance is available for inspection with the City Clerk. Published in St. Louis Park Sailor: April 14, 2016 City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4b) Page 7 Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments for Arlington Row Apartments East PUD ZONING MAP XXX XX'-X" EL = T.O. XXX EL = XX'-X" SECTION AND ELEVATION REF INTERIOR ELEVATION REF DETAIL REF WALL TYPE (SEE SHEET A10.1) WINDOW TYPE (SEE SHEET A11.2) ELEVATION REF SPOT ELEVATION REF FLOOR FINISH TRANSITION REF X X X AX.X X X X X X X X X X EXTERIOR ELEVATION KEYNOTE REF ROOM NAME AND NUMBER DOOR NUMBER SECTION KEYNOTE REF REVISION NUMBER FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET FIRE EXTINGUISHER - WALL MOUNTED ROOM X XXX XX XX elness swenson graham architects 500 washington avenue south m inneapolis m innesota 55415 p. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 5 0 8 f. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 3 8 2 w w w . e s g a r c h . c o m I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or r e p ort was prepared by m e or under m y direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of M innesota Signature Typed or Printed Nam e License # D ate PROJECT NUM BER D RAW N BY CHECKED BY O RIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIO NS KE Y PLAN N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T IO N **D R A F T **1/15/2016 9:48:47 AMT1.1 TITLE SHEET 215515 M TE DS ARLINGTON ROW ARLINGTON ROW ST. LO UIS PARK, M N - 1/15/2016 PROJECT TEAM SYMBOLS LEGEND PROJECT LOCATION SHEET INDEX ARLINGTON ROW Owner/Developer:Melrose Company Robert Cunningham Ph: 612.963.9401 Architect:Elness Swenson Graham Architects Inc. 500 Washington Ave. South, Suite 1080 Minneapolis, MN 55415 Ph: 612-339-5508 Fx: 612-339-5382 Landscape:Loucks Accociates 7200 Hemlock Lane Suite 300 Ph: 763.424.5505 / 6756 Fx: 763.424.5822 Contractor:T.B.D. Civil:Loucks Accociates 7200 Hemlock Lane Suite 300 Ph: 763.424.5505 / 6756 Fx: 763.424.5822 Mechanical,T.B.D. Electrical, Plumbing Engineers: Structural Engineer:T.B.D. VicinitySite Location SITE SHEET NUMBER SHEET NAME PUD / COMP PLAN SUBMISSION - TEXAS SITEPUD / PLAN SUBMISSION - 13TH SITEGENERAL INFORMATION T1.1 TITLE SHEET ● ● T1.2 ARCHITECTURAL ABBREVIATIONS ARCHITECTURAL SITE AS1.1 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN - OVERALL ● A AS1.2 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN - SITE A - "TEXAS" ● B AS1.3 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN - SITE B - "13TH LANE"● AS2.1 REFERENCE IMAGES ● CODE B AC1.1 ARCHITECTURAL CODE PLAN B AC1.2 ARCHITECTURAL CODE PLAN CIVIL A C0.0 ALTA / ACSM ● B C0.0 ALTA SURVEY ● A C1.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS ● B C1.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS ● A C1.2 PRELIMINARY PLAT ● B C1.2 PRELIMINARY PLAT ● A C1.3 PRELIMINARY PLAT B C1.3 PRELIMINARY PLAT ● A C2.1 SITE PLAN ● B C2.1 SITE PLAN ● A C3.1 GRADING PLAN ● B C3.1 GRADING PLAN ● A C3.2 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN ● B C3.2 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN ● B C3.3 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN ● B C3.4 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN ● A C4.1 SANITARY SEWER & WATERMAIN PLAN ● B C4.1 SANITARY & WATERMAIN ● A C4.2 STORM SEWER ● B C4.2 STORM SEWER ● A C8.1 DETAILS ● B C8.1 DETAILS ● A C8.2 CITY DETAILS ● B C8.2 CITY DETAILS ● LANDSCAPE A L1.1 LANDSCAPE PLAN ● B L1.1 LANDSCAPE PLAN ● A L2.1 TREE INVENTORY PLAN ● B L2.1 TREE INVENTORY PLAN ● ARCHITECTURAL B A1.0 FLOOR PLAN ● B A1.1 FLOOR PLAN ● B A1.2 FLOOR PLAN B A1.4 FLOOR PLAN B A1.5 FLOOR PLAN B A1.6 FLOOR PLAN B A1.7 FLOOR PLAN B A1.8 FLOOR PLAN B A3.0 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - OVERALL ● B A3.4 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ● B A4.1 BUILDING SECTIONS B A5.1 WALL SECTIONS B A8.6 1/4" UNIT PLANS & ENLARGED PLANS DETAILS B A8.7 1/4" UNIT PLANS & ENLARGED PLANS DETAILS B A8.8 1/4" UNIT PLANS & ENLARGED PLANS DETAILS B A8.9 1/4" UNIT PLANS & ENLARGED PLANS DETAILS B A8.10 1/4" UNIT PLANS & ENLARGED PLANS DETAILS B A11.1 OPENING SCHEDULES AND TYPES/DETAILS A11.3 ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE ELECTRICAL B E0.1 EXTERIOR LIGHTING ● A E0.2 EXTERIOR LIGHTING ● SITETEXAS SITE (SITE A) 13TH SITE (SITE B) No .D escription Date PUD / COM P - 2/25/2016PUD / PLAN SUBMISSION - 13TH SITE● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●2/25/16Owner/Developer:Melrose Company Robert Cunningham Ph: 612.963.9401 Architect:Elness Swenson Graham Architects Inc. 500 Washington Ave. South, Suite 1080 Minneapolis, MN 55415 Ph: 612-339-5508 Fx: 612-339-5382 Landscape:Loucks Associates 7200 Hemlock Lane Suite 300 Ph: 763.424.5505 / 6756 Fx: 763.424.5822 Contractor: Civil:Loucks Associates 7200 Hemlock Lane Suite 300 Ph: 763.424.5505 / 6756 Fx: 763.424.5822 Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing Engineers: Structural Engineer: Steen Engineering 5430 Douglas Drive North Minneapolis MN 55429 Ph: 763.585.6742 Ericksen Roed & Associates 2550 University Ave W Suite 201-S Saint Paul, MN 55114 Ph. 651.251.7570 Rochon Corporation 3650 Annapolis Lane North Suite 101 Plymouth MN 55447 Ph. 763.559.9393 City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4b) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments for Arlington Row Apartments East PUD Page 8 S. FRONTAGE RD W 13TH LN PENNSYLVANIA AVE SW 13TH LN 13 1/2 STTEXAS AVE S394 13TH LANE SITE B TEXAS AVE SITE - A AS1.2 1 PLAN AS1.3 1 PLAN 14 STALLS (ON STREET)10 STALLS (ON STREET)55' - 3 1/4"45' - 3 1/4"24' - 0"18' - 0"15 902.8 1" = 50'-0"AS1.1 1 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN elness swenson graham architects 500 washington avenue south m inneapolis m innesota 55415 p. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 5 0 8 f. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 3 8 2 w w w . e s g a r c h . c o m I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or r e p ort was prepared by m e or under m y direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of M innesota Signature Typed or Printed Nam e License # D ate PROJECT NUM BER D RAW N BY CHECKED BY O RIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIO NS KE Y PLAN N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T IO N **D R A F T **1/14/2016 2:52:05 PMAS1.1 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN - OVERALL 215515 Author Checker 04/07/15 ARLINGTON ROW ARLINGTON ROW ST. LO UIS PARK, M N - 1/15/2016 No .D escription Date PUD / COM P - 2/25/2016 City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4b) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments for Arlington Row Apartments East PUD Page 9 112' - 6 1/4"349' - 7 1/4" TRUE NORTH PARKING COUNT REQUIRED 1/BEDROOM 0 STREET 2 ACCESSIBLE 41 STANDARD TOTAL 43 STALLS 116' - 1 1/2"18' - 6"87' - 5 1/2"17' - 0"122' - 0 1/2" BIKE RACKS TREES / LANDSCAPING SHOWN FOR REF SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS TO LAYOUT AND SPECIES RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY GARDEN PLOTS AND LANDSCAPING - SEE LANDSCAPE DESIGN TRASH / RECYCLE BIKE RACKS (4) MASONRY WALLS RESIDENTE ACCESS GATE BIKE RACKS (6)BACK OF CURB6' - 0" FROM6' - 0" SIDEWALKENTRY VESTIBULEMAIL ADJACENT PROPERTIES FENCE TO REMAIN TIE NEW SIDE WALK INTO EXISTING SIDEWALKS AS CURRENTLY LOCATED AT SITE BOUNDRY OUTDOOR RECREATION AREA 'FRONT PORCH' WITH OPEN TRELLIS ABOVE 'BACK PORCH' WITH CANOPY ABOVE ENTRY ENTRY ADJACENT PROPERTY CURB CUT w/ ACCESSIBLE ACCESS RAMP MODIFY EXISTING CURB CUT w/ ACCESSIBLE ACCESS RAMP CURB CUT w/ ACCESSIBLE ACCESS RAMP EXISTING UTILITY LINE - VERIFY ADJACENT PROPERTIES FENCE TO REMAIN ADJACENT PROPERTY RETAINING WALL ALONG NORTH BOUNDARY ILLUMINATED PROPERTY SIGNAGE TBD MOUNTED TO TOP AND/OR FACE OF RETAININGS WALL INFILL ALL EXISTING CURB CUTS NOT USED LINK STORM WATER RETENTION BELOW GRADE SEE CIVIL BIKESTORAGE(25)10' - 0" BLDG SETBACK5' - 0"5' - 0"5' - 0" +/- 23' - 9 1/2"50' - 0" ROW - SEE CIVILSERVICE ACCESS BIKE RACKS (6) BIKE RACKS (4) BIKE PARKING COUNT REQURIED 1/DWELLING UNIT - 27 1/10 PARKING STALLS - 4 Total Required - 31 PROVIDED 25 INTERIOR 26 EXTERIOR / SITE TOTAL 51 STALLS 8' - 6" 0" B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 B13 B14 B19 B20 B21 B23 B40 B39 B38 B37 B36 B35 B15 B16 B17 B18 B34B41B42B43 B27 B28 B29 B30 B31 B32 B33B26B25B24 RETAINING WALL ALONG EAST BOUNDARY SEE CIVIL GRADING FOR EXTENT AND HEIGHTS 59' - 6"24' - 0"101' - 6" B22 PROPERTY LINE(S) COLLECTION TRUCK STOP PLANTER WITH BUILDING ADDRESS / SIGN SLOPESLOPECOMMUNITY ROOM18' - 0"SIDEWALK 10' - 0" EASEMENTTYPE A UNIT - REF BUILDING PLANS FOR INTERIOR LAYOUT25' - 0 1/2"GENERAL NOTES: •SEE CIVIL SITE PLAN FOR UTILITY EXISTING LOCATION •INDOOR BIKE PARKING IS LOCATED IN EASTERN BUILDING WING AND WILL BE ACCESSIBLE TO ALL RESIDENTS •5 SPACES (10% OF REQUIRED) TO BE SIGNED FOR VISITOR PARKING •12% (4,796 SF) OF SITE TO BE 'DESIGNED OUTDOOR RECREATION AREA' DORA - SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR CALCULATION - 5690SF PROPOSED elness swenson graham architects 500 washington avenue south m inneapolis m innesota 55415 p. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 5 0 8 f. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 3 8 2 w w w . e s g a r c h . c o m I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or r e p ort was prepared by m e or under m y direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of M innesota Signature Typed or Printed Nam e License # D ate PROJECT NUM BER D RAW N BY CHECKED BY O RIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIO NS KE Y PLAN N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T IO N **D R A F T **2/25/2016 4:54:52 PMAS1.3 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN - SITE B - "13TH LANE" 215515 M E ESG ARLINGTON ROW ARLINGTON ROW ST. LO UIS PARK, M N PUD / COM P - 2/25/2016 B 1/16" = 1'-0"AS1.3 1 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN PARKING COUNT - 13TH SITE 13TH Site COMPACT 8'6" X 16'0"2 A ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL 2 S STANDARD 8'6" X 18'0" 39 43 UNIT MATRIX - SITE B - 13TH LANE Count Unit Type Name SF Unit (Paint to Paint) Gross Unit Rentable (Per Unit) Total Gross Unit Rentable (=Rentable * Count) Bed rooms Total Beds 3 LEVEL 1 1 1A 2 BED 797 SF 882 SF 882 SF 2 2 1 1A 2 BED 797 SF 882 SF 882 SF 2 2 1 1Aa 2 BED 910 SF 979 SF 979 SF 2 2 1 1Aa 2 BED 910 SF 979 SF 979 SF 2 2 1 1Ab 2 BED 741 SF 811 SF 811 SF 2 2 2 1B 2 BED (2 STORY) 956 SF 1,098 SF 2,196 SF 2 4 2 1Ba 2 BED (2 STORY) 950 SF 1,091 SF 2,182 SF 2 4 3 1C 1 BED 545 SF 545 SF 1,636 SF 1 3 12 10,547 SF 21 LEVEL 2 1 2A 2 BED (2 STORY) 1,000 SF 1,123 SF 1,123 SF 2 2 2 2A 2 BED (2 STORY) 1,000 SF 1,123 SF 2,246 SF 2 4 2 2B 2 BED (2 STORY) 1,029 SF 1,168 SF 2,336 SF 2 4 2 2Ba 2 BED (2 STORY) 1,029 SF 1,168 SF 2,336 SF 2 4 6 2C 1 BED (2 STORY) 671 SF 753 SF 4,518 SF 1 6 1 2Ca 1 BED (2 STORY) 763 SF 851 SF 851 SF 1 1 1 2Ca 1 BED (2 STORY) 763 SF 851 SF 851 SF 1 1 15 14,261 SF 22 27 24,808 SF 43 TOTAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS - 27 BUILDING FOOTPRINT(S) - 10,150 SF BUILDING GROSS SF - 28,088 SF SITE AREA - .92 ACRE (39967SF) DENSITY - 29.3 UNITS / ACRE 0 168 32 No .D escription Date PLAN NORTH 1/16" = 1'-0"AS1.3 2 13TH SITE ELEVATION City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4b) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments for Arlington Row Apartments East PUD Page 10 LOUCKS W:\2015\15186.0A\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\EAST SITE\C1-1 EXISTINGPlotted: 02 /24 / 2016 9:24 AM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. CADD QUALIFICATION SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL Arlington Row Apartments East St. Louis Park, MN Melrose Company 22375 Murray Street Excelsior, MN 55331 01/15/16 CITY SUBMITTAL 02/05/16 CITY RESUBMITTAL 02/25/16 CITY RESUBMITTAL C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C1-2 PRELIMINARY PLAT C1-3 PRELIMINARY PLAT C2-1 SITE PLAN C3-1 GRADING PLAN C3-2, C3-3 & C3-4 SWPPP C4-1 SANITARY & WATERMAIN C4-2 STORM SEWER C8-1 DETAILS C8-2 CITY DETAILS L1-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2-1 TREE INVENTORY PLAN N WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. EXISTING CONDITIONS C1-1 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. PJ Disch - PE 49933 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. 07/10/2015 15186A PJD PJD PJD SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4b) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments for Arlington Row Apartments East PUD Page 11 LOUCKS W:\2015\15186\CADD DATA\SURVEY\S15186-MasterPlotted: 02 /24 / 2016 9:20 AM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. CADD QUALIFICATION SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL Arlington Row Apartments East St. Louis Park, MN Melrose Company 22375 Murray Street Excelsior, MN 55331 01/15/16 CITY SUBMITTAL 02/05/16 CITY RESUBMITTAL 02/25/16 CITY RESUBMITTAL C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C1-2 PRELIMINARY PLAT C1-3 PRELIMINARY PLAT C2-1 SITE PLAN C3-1 GRADING PLAN C3-2, C3-3 & C3-4 SWPPP C4-1 SANITARY & WATERMAIN C4-2 STORM SEWER C8-1 DETAILS C8-2 CITY DETAILS L1-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2-1 TREE INVENTORY PLAN PRELIMINARY PLAT GENERAL NOTES LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That part of Lot 2, Block 1, Penn-Zayta, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, the title thereto being registered, lying southerly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the west line of said Lot 2, distant 112.56 feet northerly of the southwest corner thereof; thence easterly to a point on the east line of said Lot 2, distant 113.07 feet northerly of the southeast corner thereof and there terminating. AND That part of Lot 3, Block 1, Penn-Zayta, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, the title thereto being registered, lying southerly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the west line of said Lot 3, distant 113.07 feet northerly of the southwest corner thereof; thence easterly to a point on the east line of said Lot 3, distant 113.58 feet northerly of the southeast corner thereof and there terminating. AND That part of Lot 4, Block 1, Penn-Zayta, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, the title thereto being registered, lying southerly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the west line of said Lot 4, distant 113.58 feet northerly of the southwest corner thereof; thence easterly to a point on the east line of said Lot 4, distant 114.09 feet northerly of the southeast corner thereof and there terminating. AND That part of Lot 5, Block 1, Penn-Zayta, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, the title thereto being registered, lying southerly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the west line of said Lot 5, distant 114.09 feet northerly of the southwest corner thereof; thence easterly to a point on the east line of said Lot 5, distant 114.60 feet northerly of the southeast corner thereof and there terminating. AND That part of Lot 6, Block 1, Penn-Zayta, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, the title thereto being registered, lying southerly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the west line of said Lot 6, distant 114.60 feet northerly of the southwest corner thereof; thence easterly to a point on the east line of said Lot 6, distant 115.11 feet northerly of the southeast corner thereof and there terminating. AND That part of Lot 7, Block 1, Penn-Zayta, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County , Minnesota, the title thereto being registered, lying southerly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the west line of said Lot 7, distant 115.11 feet northerly of the southwest corner thereof; thence easterly to a point on the east line of said Lot 7, distant 115.62 feet northerly of the southeast corner thereof and there terminating. AND That part of Lot 8, Block 1, Penn-Zayta, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, the title thereto being registered, lying southerly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the west line of said Lot 8, distant 115.62 feet northerly of the southwest corner thereof; thence easterly to a point on the east line of said Lot 8, distant 116.13 feet northerly of the southeast corner thereof and there terminating. DATE OF PREPARATION: July 2015 BENCHMARK: STAMPED SURVEY DISC MARKED 2789AV LOCATED IN SE CORNER OF WINNETKA AVE BRIDGE OVER HIGHWAY 394. ELEVATION = 921.97 FEET (NGVD29) EXISTING ZONING: Zone (R-3) Two-Family Residential AREAS: Proposed Lot 1 = 39,977 +/- Sq.Ft. or 0.92 +/- Acres FLOOD ZONE DESIGNATION: This property is contained in Zone X (areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain) per Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel No. 27053C0332E, effective date of September 2, 2004. PRELIMINARY PLAT (Existing Conditions) C1-2 Paul J. McGinley - PLS License No. Date I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Field Crew Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. 16099 7/9/15 15-186A RLL SFM RLL DP SHEET INDEX SCALE IN FEET 0 30 N City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4b) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments for Arlington Row Apartments East PUD Page 12 LOUCKS W:\2015\15186\CADD DATA\SURVEY\S15186-MasterPlotted: 02 /25 / 2016 12:21 PM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. CADD QUALIFICATION SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL Arlington Row Apartments East St. Louis Park, MN Melrose Company 22375 Murray Street Excelsior, MN 55331 01/15/16 CITY SUBMITTAL 02/05/16 CITY RESUBMITTAL 02/25/16 CITY RESUBMITTAL C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C1-2 PRELIMINARY PLAT C1-3 PRELIMINARY PLAT C2-1 SITE PLAN C3-1 GRADING PLAN C3-2, C3-3 & C3-4 SWPPP C4-1 SANITARY & WATERMAIN C4-2 STORM SEWER C8-1 DETAILS C8-2 CITY DETAILS L1-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2-1 TREE INVENTORY PLAN PRELIMINARY PLAT GENERAL NOTES LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That part of Lot 2, Block 1, Penn-Zayta, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, the title thereto being registered, lying southerly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the west line of said Lot 2, distant 112.56 feet northerly of the southwest corner thereof; thence easterly to a point on the east line of said Lot 2, distant 113.07 feet northerly of the southeast corner thereof and there terminating. AND That part of Lot 3, Block 1, Penn-Zayta, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, the title thereto being registered, lying southerly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the west line of said Lot 3, distant 113.07 feet northerly of the southwest corner thereof; thence easterly to a point on the east line of said Lot 3, distant 113.58 feet northerly of the southeast corner thereof and there terminating. AND That part of Lot 4, Block 1, Penn-Zayta, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, the title thereto being registered, lying southerly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the west line of said Lot 4, distant 113.58 feet northerly of the southwest corner thereof; thence easterly to a point on the east line of said Lot 4, distant 114.09 feet northerly of the southeast corner thereof and there terminating. AND That part of Lot 5, Block 1, Penn-Zayta, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, the title thereto being registered, lying southerly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the west line of said Lot 5, distant 114.09 feet northerly of the southwest corner thereof; thence easterly to a point on the east line of said Lot 5, distant 114.60 feet northerly of the southeast corner thereof and there terminating. AND That part of Lot 6, Block 1, Penn-Zayta, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, the title thereto being registered, lying southerly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the west line of said Lot 6, distant 114.60 feet northerly of the southwest corner thereof; thence easterly to a point on the east line of said Lot 6, distant 115.11 feet northerly of the southeast corner thereof and there terminating. AND That part of Lot 7, Block 1, Penn-Zayta, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County , Minnesota, the title thereto being registered, lying southerly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the west line of said Lot 7, distant 115.11 feet northerly of the southwest corner thereof; thence easterly to a point on the east line of said Lot 7, distant 115.62 feet northerly of the southeast corner thereof and there terminating. AND That part of Lot 8, Block 1, Penn-Zayta, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, the title thereto being registered, lying southerly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the west line of said Lot 8, distant 115.62 feet northerly of the southwest corner thereof; thence easterly to a point on the east line of said Lot 8, distant 116.13 feet northerly of the southeast corner thereof and there terminating. DATE OF PREPARATION: July 2015 BENCHMARK: STAMPED SURVEY DISC MARKED 2789AV LOCATED IN SE CORNER OF WINNETKA AVE BRIDGE OVER HIGHWAY 394. ELEVATION = 921.97 FEET (NGVD29) EXISTING ZONING: Zone (R-3) Two-Family Residential AREAS: Proposed Lot 1 = 39,977 +/- Sq.Ft. or 0.92 +/- Acres FLOOD ZONE DESIGNATION: This property is contained in Zone X (areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain) per Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel No. 27053C0332E, effective date of September 2, 2004. PRELIMINARY PLAT (Proposed Improvements) C1-3 Paul J. McGinley - PLS License No. Date I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Field Crew Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. 16099 7/9/15 15-186A RLL SFM RLL DP SHEET INDEX SCALE IN FEET 0 30 N City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4b) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments for Arlington Row Apartments East PUD Page 13 (25) INTERIOR BIKE STORAGE (4) BIKE STALLS (6) BIKE STALLS (6) BIKE STALLS (4) BIKE STALLS (6) BIKE STALLS TRASH & RECYCLE ENCLOSURE W/CONCRETE PAVEMENT WITH MASONRY WALLS TO MATCH BUILDING. SEE ARCHITECTURAL MODULAR RETAINING WALL WITH 36" FENCE FOR SCREENING 2 STAIRS SEE ARCHITECTURAL CONCRETE SIDEWALK TYP. 2 STAIRS SEE ARCHITECTURAL (8) CONCRETE PATIOS WITH SCREEN WALL. SEE ARCHITECTURAL BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT 18.0 24.0 8.5 8.0 8.0 8.0 22.0 18.0 24.0 18.0 16.0 8.5 8.5 8.5 6.0 6.0 8.5 (2) COMPACT STALLS 8.5'x16' REMOVE (7) EXISTING CONCRETE APRONS. REPLACE WITH CONCRETE CURB TO MATCH CURB IN 13TH LANE CONCRETE SIDEWALK TYP. OUTDOOR RECREATIONAL AREA RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY GARDEN SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN1 STAIR 2 STAIRS 2 STAIRS (1) COMPACT STALL 8.5'x16' COMPACT STALL SIGN COMPACT STALL SIGN ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL SIGN 3.7 1 STAIRS ADA COMPLIANT SIDEWALK AT 5% OR LESS WITH MODULAR WALL ON WEST SIDE AND BACK OF CURB EXPOSED ON EAST SIDE. PEDESTRIAN RAMP PEDESTRIAN RAMP PEDESTRIAN RAMP PEDESTRIAN RAMP PEDESTRIAN RAMP 59.557.2 3.3 1.3 3.3 13.3 BUILDING SETBACK 6' TALL CEDAR FENCE ON TOP OF RETAINING WALL 6' TALL CEDAR FENCE NO PARKING STRIPING FOR LOADING ZONE NO PARKING LOADING ZONE SIGN NO PARKING LOADING ZONE SIGN 18.5 10.0 STOP SIGN CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY EXACT LOCATION OF VAULT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION RETAINING WALL LOUCKS W:\2015\15186.0A\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\EAST SITE\C2-1 SITE PLANPlotted: 02 /24 / 2016 9:25 AM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. CADD QUALIFICATION SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL Arlington Row Apartments East St. Louis Park, MN Melrose Company 22375 Murray Street Excelsior, MN 55331 01/15/16 CITY SUBMITTAL 02/05/16 CITY RESUBMITTAL 02/25/16 CITY RESUBMITTAL C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C1-2 PRELIMINARY PLAT C1-3 PRELIMINARY PLAT C2-1 SITE PLAN C3-1 GRADING PLAN C3-2, C3-3 & C3-4 SWPPP C4-1 SANITARY & WATERMAIN C4-2 STORM SEWER C8-1 DETAILS C8-2 CITY DETAILS L1-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2-1 TREE INVENTORY PLAN N WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. SITE PLAN GENERAL NOTES 1.MINIMUM SETBACKS: FRONT BUILDING SETBACK = 25 FT SIDE BUILDING SETBACK = 10 FT. REAR BUILDING SETBACK = 0 FT. 2.ZONING EXISTING ZONING =R-3 PROPOSED ZONING = PUD 3. PARKING SUMMARY BIKE COUNT SUMMARY SURFACE REGULAR STALLS = 41 1 PER DWELLING = 27 SURFACE HANDICAPPED STALLS = 2 1 PER 10 PARKING STALLS = 5 TOTAL SURFACE STALLS = 43 TOTAL REQUIRED = 32 BIKE STALLS INSIDE = 25 BIKE STALLS OUTSIDE = 26 TOTAL PROPOSED = 51 4. AREA/DENSITY TOTAL AREA = 39,977 SQ.FT. OR 0.918 AC. IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA = 30,795 SQ.FT. OR 0.707 AC. = 77.0% PERVIOUS SURFACE AREA = 9,182 SQ.FT. OR 0.211 AC. =23.0% 5. ALL PAVING, CONCRETE CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DETAILS SHOWN PER SHEET C8-1 AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. SEE LANDSCAPE AND ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR ANY ADDITIONAL HARDSCAPE APPLICATIONS. 6. THE CITY AND THE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY WORK WITHIN THE STREET RIGHT OF WAY (SIDEWALK, STREET OR DRIVEWAYS) 7. MINNESOTA STATE STATUTE REQUIRES NOTIFICATION PER "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY GRADING, EXCAVATION OR UNDERGROUND WORK. 8. SEE CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS FOR ANY REMOVAL DETAILS. 9. ANY SIGN OR FIXTURES REMOVED WITH IN THE RIGHT OF WAY OR AS PART OF THE SITE WORK SHALL BE REPLACED BY THE CONTRACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY REQUIREMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PRESERVE AND MAINTAIN ANY EXISTING STREET LIGHTS AND TRAFFIC SIGNS PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. 10. CLEAR AND GRUB AND REMOVE ALL TREES, VEGETATION AND SITE DEBRIS PRIOR TO GRADING. ALL REMOVED MATERIAL SHALL BE HAULED FROM THE SITE DAILY. ALL CLEARING AND GRUBBING AND REMOVALS SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY ESTABLISHED UPON REMOVAL. (SEE SHEET C3-1) 11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO OBTAIN ALL PERMITS FROM THE CITY AS REQUIRED FOR ALL WORK WITH THE STREET AND PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. 12. A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF SITE IMPROVEMENTS NOT SHOWN ON THIS SHEET ARE DESCRIBED AND PROVIDED IN FURTHER DETAIL ON THE ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPE PLANS. THIS INCLUDES LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND OTHER FIXTURES. 13. B612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE EDGE OF ALL COMMON DRIVES AND PARKING LOTS. 14. CONSTRUCTION NOTES: A. PEDESTRIAN RAMPS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE LOCATIONS SHOWN AND AS SHOWN PER THE LANDSCAPE SITE PLANS. B. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SAW-CUT BITUMINOUS AND CONCRETE PAVEMENTS AS REQUIRED PER THE SPECIFICATIONS. REMOVE EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER AND INSTALL B618 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER. 15. SEE SHEETS C3-1 AND C4-1 FOR GRADING AND UTILITIES. 16. ALL CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER B612, CITY'S STANDARD PLATES. (SEE DETAIL SHEET). 17. THE INTENT OF THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION IS TO PRESERVE AS MUCH OF THE EXISTING STREET PAVEMENT AS POSSIBLE, AND TO MILL AND OVERLAY. REMOVED PAVEMENT AREAS AND PATCHING SHALL BE INSTALLED PER PAVEMENT SECTION PROVIDED PER DETAIL SHEET. PAVEMENT LEGEND: CONCRETE PAVEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK SITE PLAN C2-1 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. PJ Disch - PE 49933 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. 07/10/2015 15186A MJS PJD PJD SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4b) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments for Arlington Row Apartments East PUD Page 14 TW=915.00 BW=915.00 TW=914.60 BW=909.00 TW=914.60 BW=904.50 TW=915.00 BW=905.80 TW=915.00 BW=906.20 TW=913.00 BW=913.00 TW=915.00 BW=907.00 TW=915.00 BW=907.00 TC=914.00 TSW=913.00 TC=914.90 TSW=913.90 TC=912.00 TSW=912.00 TW=912.00 BW=912.00 TW=915.50 BW=913.00 TW=916.20 BW=914.00 TW=916.20 BW=915.00 TW=915.90 BW=915.90 LOUCKS W:\2015\15186.0A\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\EAST SITE\C3-1 GRADINGPlotted: 02 /24 / 2016 9:25 AM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. CADD QUALIFICATION SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL Arlington Row Apartments East St. Louis Park, MN Melrose Company 22375 Murray Street Excelsior, MN 55331 01/15/16 CITY SUBMITTAL 02/05/16 CITY RESUBMITTAL 02/25/16 CITY RESUBMITTAL C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C1-2 PRELIMINARY PLAT C1-3 PRELIMINARY PLAT C2-1 SITE PLAN C3-1 GRADING PLAN C3-2, C3-3 & C3-4 SWPPP C4-1 SANITARY & WATERMAIN C4-2 STORM SEWER C8-1 DETAILS C8-2 CITY DETAILS L1-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2-1 TREE INVENTORY PLAN N WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. GRADING PLAN C3-1 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. PJ Disch - PE 49933 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. 07/10/2015 15186A MJS PJD PJDSCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1. SPOT ELEVATIONS REPRESENT FINISHED SURFACE GRADES, GUTTER/FLOW LINE, FACE OF BUILDING, OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2. CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.16 FEET. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON PLANS DO NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS. 3. GRADING OF THE INFILTRATION AREAS SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED USING LOW-IMPACT EARTH-MOVING EQUIPMENT TO PREVENT COMPACTION OF THE UNDERLYING SOILS. SMALL TRACKED DOZERS AND BOBCATS WITH RUNNER TRACKS ARE RECOMMENDED. 4. ALL DISTURBED UNPAVED AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE MINIMUM OF 6 INCHES OF TOP SOIL AND SEED/MULCH OR SOD. THESE AREAS SHALL BE WATERED/MAINTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR UNTIL VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED. 5. FOR SITE RETAINING WALLS "TW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT TOP FACE OF WALL (NOT TOP OF WALL), "TC" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT TOP OF CURB, "TSW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT TOP OF SIDEWALK AND "BW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT BOTTOM FACE OF WALL (NOT BOTTOM OF BURIED WALL COURSES). 6. REFER TO THE REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION AND REVIEW (REPORT NO. ________), DATED ____________ AS PREPARED BY ________________FOR AN EXISTING SUBSURFACE SITE CONDITION ANALYSIS AND CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATIONS. 7. STREETS MUST BE CLEANED AND SWEPT WHENEVER TRACKING OF SEDIMENTS OCCURS AND BEFORE SITES ARE LEFT IDLE FOR WEEKENDS AND HOLIDAYS. A REGULAR SWEEPING SCHEDULE MUST BE ESTABLISHED. 8. DUST MUST BE ADEQUATELY CONTROLLED. 9. SEE SWPPP FOR ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL NOTES AND REQUIREMENTS. 10. SEE UTILITY PLAN FOR WATER, STORM AND SANITARY SEWER INFORMATION. 11. SEE SITE PLAN FOR CURB AND BITUMINOUS TAPER LOCATIONS. City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4b) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments for Arlington Row Apartments East PUD Page 15 CONCRETE WASHOUT ROCK ENTRANCE PAD INLET PROTECTION TYP LOUCKS W:\2015\15186.0A\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\EAST SITE\C3-2 SWPPPPlotted: 02 /24 / 2016 9:25 AM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. CADD QUALIFICATION SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL Arlington Row Apartments East St. Louis Park, MN Melrose Company 22375 Murray Street Excelsior, MN 55331 01/15/16 CITY SUBMITTAL 02/05/16 CITY RESUBMITTAL 02/25/16 CITY RESUBMITTAL C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C1-2 PRELIMINARY PLAT C1-3 PRELIMINARY PLAT C2-1 SITE PLAN C3-1 GRADING PLAN C3-2, C3-3 & C3-4 SWPPP C4-1 SANITARY & WATERMAIN C4-2 STORM SEWER C8-1 DETAILS C8-2 CITY DETAILS L1-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2-1 TREE INVENTORY PLAN NWARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C3-2 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. PJ Disch - PE 49933 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. 07/10/2015 15186A MJS PJD PJD SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT INFILTRATION STORMWATER HARVEST AND REUSE FILTRATION WET SEDIMENTATION BASIN REGIONAL PONDING X ESTIMATED QUANTITIES DESCRIPTION UNIT TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EA PREFABRICATED CONCRETE WASHOUT EA SILT FENCE (STANDARD)LF INLET PROTECTION EA QUANTITY 1 1 920 1 SEEDING/SOD AC 0.25 INLET PROTECTION SWPPP LEGEND SILT FENCE EXISTING DRAINAGE PATTERN PROPOSED DRAINAGE PATTERN CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER SPECIAL WATERS SEARCH MAP SITE VICINITY MAP PROJECT LOCATION City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4b) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments for Arlington Row Apartments East PUD Page 16 SAN INV= 907.00 CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY MAIN WITH SAN MH 1 RIM=914.5 INV=905.56 30 LF 6" PVC @ 4.80% 2" DOMESTIC SERVICE WITH 2" COMPOUND METER W/STRAINER & BY-PASS CITY OWNED LOCK CONNECT TO EXISTING 12" WATER MAIN WITH 6" FIRE SERVICE, 2" DOMESTIC SERVICE AND GATE VALVES PER CITY STANDARDS 6" DIP 6" FIRE SERVICE 6x6x6 TEE WITH 6" GATE VALVE & 6" DIP 2" DOMESTIC DISCONNECT (7) EXISTING SEWER STUBS AT MAIN PER CITY STANDARD. COORDINATE WITH CITY FOR EXACT LOCATION. DISCONNECT (1) EXISTING WATER STUB AT MAIN PER CITY STANDARD. COORDINATE WITH CITY FOR EXACT LOCATION. LOUCKS W:\2015\15186.0A\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\EAST SITE\C4-1 SANITARY & WATERPlotted: 02 /24 / 2016 9:27 AM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. CADD QUALIFICATION SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL Arlington Row Apartments East St. Louis Park, MN Melrose Company 22375 Murray Street Excelsior, MN 55331 01/15/16 CITY SUBMITTAL 02/05/16 CITY RESUBMITTAL 02/25/16 CITY RESUBMITTAL C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C1-2 PRELIMINARY PLAT C1-3 PRELIMINARY PLAT C2-1 SITE PLAN C3-1 GRADING PLAN C3-2, C3-3 & C3-4 SWPPP C4-1 SANITARY & WATERMAIN C4-2 STORM SEWER C8-1 DETAILS C8-2 CITY DETAILS L1-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2-1 TREE INVENTORY PLAN N WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. SANITARY & WATERMAIN C4-1 UTILITY PLAN GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND WATERMAIN UTILITIES SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPECIFICATIONS, THE CITY AND THE STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATION OF THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM), 1999 EDITION. ALL HDPE CONNECTIONS TO CONCRETE MANHOLES SHALL BE CONNECTED WITH AN INTERNAL RUBBER GASKET OR BY USING ADS WATERSTOP GASKET. ALL SANITARY SEWER MAIN LINE SHALL BE SDR 35. ALL SANITARY SEWER SERVICES SHALL BE SDR 26. 2. SEE SHEET C8-1 AND THE CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS FOR SPECIFIC UTILITY DETAILS AND UTILITY SERVICE DETAILS. 3. ALL UTILITY PIPE BEDDING SHALL BE COMPACTED SAND OR FINE GRANULAR MATERIAL PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. ALL COMPACTION SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CEAM SPECIFICATION. 4. ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. THE CITY DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING AND BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT AND THE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER MUST BE NOTIFIED AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY WORK WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, OR WORK IMPACTING PUBLIC UTILITIES. 5. ALL SANITARY SEWER AND WATER SERVICES SHALL TERMINATE AT THE PROPERTY LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO PERFORMING ANY EXCAVATION OR UNDERGROUND WORK. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD ADJUST WATERMAIN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER, AND SERVICES AS REQUIRED. INSULATION OF WATER AND SANITARY SEWER LINES SHALL BE PROVIDED WHERE 7.5 FEET MINIMUM DEPTH CAN NOT BE ATTAINED. 8. ALL STREET REPAIRS AND PATCHING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE ALL SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED AUTHORITY OF OF THE CITY. 9. ALL NEW WATERMAIN MUST HAVE A MINIMUM OF 7.5 FEET OF COVER. 10. ADJUST ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES, BOTH PUBLIC AND PRIVATE TO THE PROPOSED GRADES WHERE DISTURBED AND COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE UTILITY OWNERS. STRUCTURES BEING RESET TO PAVED AREAS MUST MEET OWNERS REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC LOADING. 11. PROPOSED PIPE MATERIALS: WATERMAIN DIP CLASS 52 NO LESS THAN 7.5' DEEP. SANITARY SEWER PVC SDR 35 NO MORE THAN 20' DEEP. SANITARY SEWER PVC SDR26 20' - 25' DEEP. STORM SEWER RCP CLASS 5 12" TO 18" DIAMETER. DRAINTILE POLYETHYLENE Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. PJ Disch - PE 49933 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. 07/10/2015 15186A MJS PJD PJDSCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4b) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments for Arlington Row Apartments East PUD Page 17 CBMH 1 RIM=913.50 INV=909.50 SUMP=906.50 109 LF - 15" STORM @ 1.00% CBMH 2 RIM=914.10 INV=908.41 SUMP=905.41 48 LF - 15" STORM @ 2.94% 72" STORM VAULT 110' - 72" PERFORATED CMP @ 0.00% INV=902.50 ROCK INV=902.00 SAND INV=900.00 4" DRAINTILE INV=900.00 SEE DETAIL ON C8-1 42" ACCESS MH 13 RIM=914.30 SEE DETAIL ON C8-1 CBMH 3 RIM=913.40 INV=908.00 SUMP=905.00 15" INV 907.00 42 LF - 15" STORM @ 2.38% CBMH 4 RIM=915.30 INV=911.30 CBMH 5 RIM=915.20 INV=910.91 CBMH 6 RIM=915.20 INV=910.30 CBMH 7 RIM=914.80 INV=909.99 CBMH 8 RIM=915.20 INV=909.52 W INV=909.32 E CBMH 9 RIM=913.50 INV=909.50 STMH 10 RIM=914.60 INV=908.89 W INV=909.09 E INV=908.89 N 39 LF - 12" PVC @ 1.00% 61 LF - 12" PVC @ 1.00%31 LF - 12" PVC @ 1.00% 47 LF - 12" PVC @ 1.00% 43 LF - 15" PVC @ 1.00% 81 LF - 15" STORM @ 2.33% 44 LF - 12" PVC @ 0.93% 10 LF - 8" PVC @ 2.00% STMH 11 RIM=914.45 INV=906.90 S (8") INV=900.00 S (4") INV=900.00 N (12") 28 LF - 12" STORM @ 2.00% CORE DRILL 12" STORM PIPE INTO EXISTING CB AT INV=899.44. VERIFY DEPTH OF 6" STEEL GAS LINE BEFORE CORE DRILL. LOWER INVERT AS NEEDED IF GAS LINE IS IN COONFLICT LOUCKS W:\2015\15186.0A\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\EAST SITE\C4-2 STORMPlotted: 02 /24 / 2016 9:27 AM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. CADD QUALIFICATION SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL Arlington Row Apartments East St. Louis Park, MN Melrose Company 22375 Murray Street Excelsior, MN 55331 01/15/16 CITY SUBMITTAL 02/05/16 CITY RESUBMITTAL 02/25/16 CITY RESUBMITTAL C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C1-2 PRELIMINARY PLAT C1-3 PRELIMINARY PLAT C2-1 SITE PLAN C3-1 GRADING PLAN C3-2, C3-3 & C3-4 SWPPP C4-1 SANITARY & WATERMAIN C4-2 STORM SEWER C8-1 DETAILS C8-2 CITY DETAILS L1-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2-1 TREE INVENTORY PLAN N WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. STORM SEWER C4-2 UTILITY PLAN GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND WATERMAIN UTILITIES SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPECIFICATIONS, THE CITY AND THE STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATION OF THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM), 1999 EDITION. ALL HDPE CONNECTIONS TO CONCRETE MANHOLES SHALL BE CONNECTED WITH AN INTERNAL RUBBER GASKET OR BY USING ADS WATERSTOP GASKET. ALL SANITARY SEWER MAIN LINE SHALL BE SDR 35. ALL SANITARY SEWER SERVICES SHALL BE SDR 26. 2. SEE SHEET C8-1 AND THE CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS FOR SPECIFIC UTILITY DETAILS AND UTILITY SERVICE DETAILS. 3. ALL UTILITY PIPE BEDDING SHALL BE COMPACTED SAND OR FINE GRANULAR MATERIAL PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. ALL COMPACTION SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CEAM SPECIFICATION. 4. ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. THE CITY DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING AND BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT AND THE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER MUST BE NOTIFIED AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY WORK WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, OR WORK IMPACTING PUBLIC UTILITIES. 5. ALL SANITARY SEWER AND WATER SERVICES SHALL TERMINATE AT THE PROPERTY LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO PERFORMING ANY EXCAVATION OR UNDERGROUND WORK. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD ADJUST WATERMAIN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER, AND SERVICES AS REQUIRED. INSULATION OF WATER AND SANITARY SEWER LINES SHALL BE PROVIDED WHERE 7.5 FEET MINIMUM DEPTH CAN NOT BE ATTAINED. 8. ALL STREET REPAIRS AND PATCHING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE ALL SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED AUTHORITY OF OF THE CITY. 9. ALL NEW WATERMAIN MUST HAVE A MINIMUM OF 7.5 FEET OF COVER. 10. ADJUST ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES, BOTH PUBLIC AND PRIVATE TO THE PROPOSED GRADES WHERE DISTURBED AND COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE UTILITY OWNERS. STRUCTURES BEING RESET TO PAVED AREAS MUST MEET OWNERS REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC LOADING. 11. PROPOSED PIPE MATERIALS: WATERMAIN DIP CLASS 52 NO LESS THAN 7.5' DEEP. SANITARY SEWER PVC SDR 35 NO MORE THAN 20' DEEP. SANITARY SEWER PVC SDR26 20' - 25' DEEP. STORM SEWER RCP CLASS 5 12" TO 18" DIAMETER. DRAINTILE POLYETHYLENE STORM SEWER SCHEDULE STRUCTURE NO.CASTING MANHOLE SIZE CBMH 1 2'x3' PRECAST CBMH 2 48" PRECAST CBMH 3 48" PRECAST CBMH 4 NYLOPLAST CB CBMH 5 CBMH 6 R-3067 24" DOME Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. PJ Disch - PE 49933 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. 07/10/2015 15186A MJS PJD PJDSCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 CBMH 7 CBMH 8 CBMH 9 STMH 10 STMH 11 48" PRECASTR-1648 48" PRECASTR-1648 R-3067 R-3067 NYLOPLAST CB24" DOME NYLOPLAST CB24" DOME NYLOPLAST CB24" DOME NYLOPLAST CB24" DOME NYLOPLAST CB24" DOME STMH 12 STMH 13 R-1648 42" ACCESS RISERR-1648 42" ACCESS RISER City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4b) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments for Arlington Row Apartments East PUD Page 18 LOUCKS W:\2015\15186.0A\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\EAST SITE\C8-1 DETAILPlotted: 02 /24 / 2016 9:27 AM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. CADD QUALIFICATION SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL Arlington Row Apartments East St. Louis Park, MN Melrose Company 22375 Murray Street Excelsior, MN 55331 01/15/16 CITY SUBMITTAL 02/05/16 CITY RESUBMITTAL 02/25/16 CITY RESUBMITTAL C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C1-2 PRELIMINARY PLAT C1-3 PRELIMINARY PLAT C2-1 SITE PLAN C3-1 GRADING PLAN C3-2, C3-3 & C3-4 SWPPP C4-1 SANITARY & WATERMAIN C4-2 STORM SEWER C8-1 DETAILS C8-2 CITY DETAILS L1-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2-1 TREE INVENTORY PLAN DETAILS C8-1 STANDARD GUTTER 8"A 6" 13.5" 1 2" RAD. 24"B624 B618 18" B612 12" CURB TYPE "A" MIN. OF 4" AGG. BASE UNDER CURB (IF TOTAL THICKNESS OF SECTION ALLOWS) 3/8 " LIP 3" RAD. 1 3 3" RAD. AGG. BASE VARIES PAVEMENT SECTION VARIES SEE PAVEMENT SECTION DETAIL SLOPE GUTTER TO MATCH PARKING LOT DRAINAGE (3/4" PER FT. TYP.) TIP GUTTER OUT AS REQ'D DRAWN 1/2014 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 2009B6 STYLE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER MINIMUM 1' BEHIND BACK OF CURB 7" SPECIFICATION NOTES: 1. UPON COMPLETION, CURBING SHOULD BE SPRAYED WITH A MEMBRANE CURING COMPOUND PER MNDOT 3754. 2. EXPANSION JOINTS AT MAX. SPACING OF 200'. 3. CONSTRUCT IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT 2531. 2" BIT. WEAR COURSE, MN/DOT 2360 SPWEA240B TACK COAT, MN/DOT 2357 2" BIT. NON-WEAR COURSE, MN/DOT 2360 SPNWB230B 6" AGG. BASE, CLASS 5 OR 2 MN/DOT 3138 SURFACE COMPACTION FINISHED GRADE DRAWN 1/2014 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 2030BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION NOTES: 1. CONCRETE SHOULD BE REINFORCED WITH WELDED WIRE FABRIC OR REINFORCING BARS TO ASSIST IN CONTROLLING CRACKING FROM DRYING SHRINKAGE AND THERMAL CHANGES. 2. SAWED OR FORMED CONTROL JOINTS SHOULD BE INCLUDED FOR EACH 225 SQUARE FEET OF AREA OR LESS (15 FEET BY 15 FEET). 3. SAW CUTS SHOULD NOT CUT THROUGH THE WELDED WIRE FABRIC OR REINFORCING STEEL AND DOWELS SHOULD BE UTILIZED AT FORMED AND/OR COLD JOINTS. 6" COMPACTED AGGREGATE BASE CL. 5 OR 2 MN/DOT 3138 FINISHED GRADE 8" CONCRETE MN/DOT SPEC. 2301 DRAWN 1/2014 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 2033CONCRETE PAVEMENT SECTION DRAWN 1/2014 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 2034CONCRETE SIDEWALK SECTION 4" CONCRETE WALK MN/DOT 2521 4" GRANULAR MATERIAL MN/DOT 3149 WIRE MESH WIRE MESH DRAWN 12/2013 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 3001HEAVY DUTY SILT FENCE 6" 6" GEOTEXTILE FABRIC PER MNDOT 3886 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC PER MNDOT 3886 NOTES: 1. PLACE BOTTOM EDGE OF WIRE FENCE INTO 6 IN DEEP TRENCH. 2. POSTS SHALL BE: •6 FT MAX. SPACING. •STANDARD STEEL T-TYPE POSTS. •5' MIN. LENGTH POSTS, DRIVEN 2 FT INTO THE GROUND. 3. ATTACH WIRE FENCE TO STEEL POSTS WITH NO. 9 GA. ALUMINUM WIRE OR NO. 9 GALVANIZED STEEL PRE-FORMED CLIPS. 4. ATTACH FABRIC TO WIRE FENCING WITH WIRE OR ZIP TIES. A MIN. OF 3 ZIP TIES PER POST. EXTEND BOTTOM OF FABRIC INTO TRENCH. 5. BACKFILL TRENCH & COMPACT. DRAWN 12/2013 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 3010INLET PROTECTION - EXISTING STORM STRUCTURES HIGH-FLOW FABRIC CURB DEFLECTOR PLATE OVERFLOW 1-CENTER OF FILTER ASSEMBLY OVERFLOW 2 - TOP OF CURB BOX POLYESTER SLEEVE MANHOLE COVER ASSEMBLY FILTER ASSEMBLY 27" 27" SEDIMENT CONTROL BARRIER 2'X3' SEDIMENT CONTROL BARRIER ROAD DRAIN HIGH-FLOW INLET PROTECTION CURB AND GUTTER MODEL WIMCO ROAD DRAIN, OR APPROVED EQUAL HARD SURFACE PUBLIC ROAD 2' MINIMUM 1" TO 2" WASHED ROCK 6" MINIMUM DRAWN 12/2013 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 3003ROCK ENTRANCE TO CONSTRUCTION SITE NOTES: 1. ROCK SIZE SHOULD BE 1" TO 2" IN SIZE SUCH AS MN/DOT CA-1 OR CA-2 COURSE AGGREGATE. (WASHED) 2. A GEOTEXTILE FABRIC MAY BE USED UNDER THE ROCK TO PREVENT MIGRATION OF THE UNDERLYING SOIL INTO THE STONE. 15' (MIN) SIGN 24"X36"X3/4" PLYWOOD PAINT PLYWOOD FACE WHITE WITH 4"MIN. STENCILED LETTERS PAINTED BLACK 8'TREATED 4"X4" POST CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA WASHOUT AREA MUST BE IMPERMEABLE. CONTRACTOR TO CONSTRUCT APPROPRIATE IMPERMEABLE CONTAINMENT SYSTEM & REMOVE/PUMP LIQUID ONCE THE LEVEL EXCEEDS TWO-THIRDS OF THE SURROUNDING BARRIER CONTRACTOR TO PLACE THE CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE MIN. 8" DIA BIO LOGS MIN. 2FT HIGH SOIL BERM DRAWN 12/2013 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 3005CONCRETE WASHOUT NOTE: GRANULAR MATERIALS FURNISHED FOR USE IN FOUNDATION, BEDDING, ENCASEMENT, OR BACKFILL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS: •FOUNDATION MATERIALS SHALL HAVE 100% PASSING THE 1 1/2" SIEVE AND A MAXIMUM OF 10% PASSING THE No. 4 SIEVE. NOT LESS THAN 50% OF THE MATERIAL RETAINED BY THE No. 4 SIEVE SHALL HAVE ONE (1) OR MORE CRUSHED FACES. HARD, DURABLE CRUSHED CARBONATE QUARRY ROCK MAY BE USED FOR FOUNDATION MATERIALS. •BEDDING AND ENCASEMENT MATERIALS FOR FLEXIBLE PIPE SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF MNDOT SPECIFICATION 3149.2B1, GRANULAR BORROW, EXCEPT THAT 100% SHALL PASS THE ONE INCH (1") SIEVE. •BACKFILL MATERIALS SHALL CONSIST OF SUITABLE EXISTING TRENCH MATERIALS, EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. SUITABLE MATERIAL SHALL BE DEFINED AS A MINERAL SOIL FREE OF FOREIGN MATERIALS (RUBBISH, ORGANICS & DEBRIS), FROZEN CLUMPS, OVERSIZE STONE, ROCK, CONCRETE OR BITUMINOUS CHUNKS, AND OTHER UNSUITABLE MATERIALS THAT MAY DAMAGE PIPE, PREVENT THOROUGH COMPACTION, OR INCREASE THE RISKS OF SETTLEMENT. DRAWN 12/2013 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 4008PLASTIC PIPE BEDDING PLASTIC PIPE 18"18"PIPE WIDTH ENCASEMENT BEDDING FOUNDATION (MAY NOT BE REQUIRED) 12" 6" BACKFILL COMPACTED AS SPECIFIED EXCAVATED TRENCH WIDTH DRAWN 12/2013 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 4310CONCRETE PIPE BEDDING RCP PIPE 18"18"PIPE WIDTH COMPACTED SAND OR 3 4" TO 1-1 2" CLEAR ROCK (AS DIRECTED) COMPACTED SUBGRADE 6" RCP PIPE 18"18"PIPE WIDTH SHAPE BOTTOM OF EXISTING TRENCH MATERIAL TO FIT PIPE BARREL. COMPACTED BACKFILL EXCAVATED TRENCH WIDTH CLASS C BEDDING CLASS B BEDDING COMPACTED BACKFILL EXCAVATED TRENCH WIDTH PAVEMENT SECTION BASED ON GEOTECHNICAL REPORT BY BRAUN INTERTEC, DATED MAY 28,2015 NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL REQUIRED CMP, PIPE BENDS AND TEES TO CONNECT PIPES AT THE LIMITS OF THE UNDERGROUND PIPE SYSTEM FOOTPRINT. (SEE UTILITY PLAN) 2. 4" PVC DRAINTILE SHALL FOLLOW 48" CMP PIPES AS SHOW ABOVE AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE PIPE SYSTEM. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL TEES AS NECESSARY TO CONNECT DRAINTILE OUTLET MANHOLE. 72" PERFORATED PIPE SYSTEM LOUCKS PLATE NO. Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. PJ Disch - PE 49933 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. 07/10/2015 15186A MJS PJD PJD 72" CMP 4" SLOTTED SINGLE WALL HDPE PIPING WITH CIRCULAR KNIT POLYMERIC FILAMENT FILTER SOCK PER ASTM D6707-01 FREE DRAINING ANGULAR WASHED STONE 2" TO 3" MAX. PARTICLE SIZE NO CARBONATE 24" FREE DRAINING GRAVEL SAND (GW, GP, GM 0R SW) PARTICLE SIZE - 0.02-0.04 INCHES 24" 72" FILTER FABRIC SEPARATOR 12"12" FILTER FABRIC SEPARATOR 6" 6" IE= 902.5 IE= 902.0 IE= 900.0 IE= 908.5 IE= 909.0 (1) 110 LF OF 72" PERFORATED CMP SEE SHEET C4-2 FOR LAYOUT LOUCKS PLATE NO. ADA SIDEWALK FROM WAYZATA BOULEVARD 20" 4" CONCRETE WALK MN/DOT 2521 4" GRANULAR MATERIAL MN/DOT 3149 MIN. OF 4" AGG. BASE UNDER CURB (IF TOTAL THICKNESS OF SECTION ALLOWS) MODULAR WALL EXTRA DEPTH CONCRETE B612 CURB AND GUTTER CRUSHED GRAVEL NOTES: 1. SEE GRADING PLAN FOR WALL AND CUR HEIGHTS ADJUST CASTING TO 14" - 12" BELOW FINISHED GRADE, TYPICAL FOR ALL CASTINGS IN PAVEMENT / *INSTALL WHEN M.H. IS PLACED OUTSIDE OF THE ROADWAY. DRAWN 12/2013 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 4300 STANDARD STORM SEWER MANHOLE WITH CONE SECTION FLOW 2" 0"-8" 2" 27" 48" CONCRETE ADJUSTING RINGS, MIN. 4" - MAX. 10" MANHOLE CASTING FRAME AND COVER-NEENAH R-1733 OR APPROVED EQUAL. INCLUDES SOLID LID & "STORM SEWER" LETTERING. RUBBER GASKETS BETWEEN EACH JOINT IN MANHOLE SECTIONS. 1. WHERE WATER MAY STAND, TOP OF MH SHALL BE 2 FEET ABOVE GROUND, AND/OR 2 FEET ABOVE THE 100 YEAR STORM WATER LEVEL. 2. ON MANHOLES 8' DEEP AND GREATER A ONE FOOT FOUR INCH (1'-4") PRECAST SECTION SHALL BE PLACED IMMEDIATELY BELOW CONE SECTION. 3. WHEN MANHOLE DEPTH IS LESS THAN 8', A TOP SLAB SHALL BE USED IN PLACE OF THE CONE. TOP SLAB SHALL BE SUITABLE FOR AASHTO HS20 HIGHWAY LOADINGS. THE SLAB SHALL BE SET ON A MORTAR BED. 4. ALL JOINTS BETWEEN SECTIONS SHALL HAVE RUBBER O-RING GASKETS. 5. MINIMUM BASE SLAB THICKNESS, 6" TO 14' DEPTH. INCREASE THICKNESS 1" FOR EACH 4' OF DEPTH GREATER THAN 14'. NOTES: STEPS 16" O.C. ON DOWNSTREAM SIDE. EXTRUDED ALUMINUM OR STEEL REINFORCED COPOLYMER PLASTIC. FLOW SECTION A-A SECTION B-B NOTES: VARIABLE THICKNESS HDPE ADJUSTING RINGS AS REQUIRED. MIN. OF 4" ADJUSTMENT AND MAX. OF 12" ADJUSTMENT. USE LARGER ADJUSTMENT RINGS TO MINIMIZE THE NUMBER OF JOINTS. INCLUDE ONE 2" RING IMMEDIATELY UNDER THE CASTING. USE TAPERED RINGS TO MATCH CASTING TO STREET GRADE. APPLY BUTYL SEALANT BETWEEN ALL THE JOINTS. CONCRETE RINGS SET IN A MORTAR BED ARE ACCEPTABLE. ADJUST CASTING TO 14" - 12" BELOW FINISHED GRADE, TYPICAL FOR ALL CASTINGS IN PAVEMENT NOTE: ALL CONNECTIONS THROUGH MH SHALL HAVE A RUBBER BOOT. ANY FIELD ADDED OPENING FOR PIPE SHALL BE CORE DRILLED AND AN ELASTOMERIC RUBBER BOOT INSTALLED. / * INSTALL WHEN M.H. IS PLACED OUTSIDE OF THE ROADWAY. BENCH SLOPE DRAWN 12/2013 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 4001 STANDARD SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE WITH JOINT SEALS MANHOLE CASTING AND COVER, NEENAH R-1642 OR APPROVED EQUAL WITH TWO (2) CONCEALED PICK HOLES. 1. WHERE WATER MAY STAND, TOP OF MH SHALL BE 2 FEET ABOVE GROUND, AND/OR 2 FEET ABOVE THE 100 YEAR STORM WATER LEVEL. 2. ON MANHOLES 8' DEEP AND GREATER A ONE FOOT FOUR INCH (1'-4") PRECAST SECTION SHALL BE PLACED IMMEDIATELY BELOW CONE SECTION. 3. WHEN MANHOLE DEPTH IS LESS THAN 8', A TOP SLAB SHALL BE USED IN PLACE OF THE CONE. TOP SLAB SHALL BE SUITABLE FOR AASHTO HS20 HIGHWAY LOADINGS. THE SLAB SHALL BE SET ON A MORTAR BED. 4. ALL JOINTS BETWEEN SECTIONS SHALL HAVE RUBBER O-RING GASKETS. 5. MINIMUM BASE SLAB THICKNESS, 6" TO 14' DEPTH. INCREASE THICKNESS 1" FOR EACH 4' OF DEPTH GREATER THAN 14'. STEPS 16" O.C. ON DOWNSTREAM SIDE. EXTRUDED ALUMINUM OR STEEL REINFORCED COPOLYMER PLASTIC. 20" TO SPRING LINE (MAX.) SLOPE 2"/FOOT 7" 27" 48" A B B A 6" INFI-SHIELD EXTERNAL GATOR WRAP OR APPROVED EQUAL TYPICAL ALL BARREL JOINTS INSTALL POLYMER I/I BARRIER BY STRIKE PRODUCTS OR APPROVED EQUAL FOR ALL NEW & EXISTING STRUCTURES. ADAPTOR INC'S INTERNAL/EXTERNAL ADAPTOR SEAL OR IT'S E3 CHIMNEY SEAL PRODUCTS OR APPROVED EQUAL MAY BE USED WHEN RECONSTRUCTING EXISTING MANHOLES (WITH ENGINEERS APPROVAL).8"11" TYP.2"1" GAP (TYP. ALLSIDES)NOTES: 1. DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE WITH AASHTO, 17th EDITION. 2. DESIGN LOAD HS25. 3. EARTH COVER = 1' MAX. 4. CONCRETE STRENGTH = 3,500 psi 5. REINFORCING STEEL = ASTM A615, GRADE 60. 6. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL REINFORCING AROUND OPENINGS EQUAL TO THE BARS INTERRUPTED, HALF EACH SIDE. ADDITIONAL BARS TO BE IN THE SAME PLANE. A A2" COVER (TYP) SECTION VIEW ROUND OPTION PLAN VIEW SQUARE OPTION PLAN VIEW &035,6(5 INTERRUPTED BAR REPLACEMENT, SEE NOTE 6. STANDARD REINFORCING, SEE TABLE OPENING IN PROTECTION SLAB FOR CASTING #4 DIAGONAL TRIM BAR (TYP. 4 PLACES), SEE NOTE 7. $ INTERRUPTED BAR REPLACEMENT, SEE NOTE 6. % OPENING IN PROTECTION SLAB FOR CASTING #4 DIAGONAL TRIM BAR (TYP. 4 PLACES), SEE NOTE 7. STANDARD REINFORCING, SEE TABLE GASKET MATERIAL SUFFICIENT TO PREVENT SLAB FROM BEARING ON RISER TO BE PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR. 2 " COVER (TYP . ) % ACCESS CASTING TO BE PROVIDED AND INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR. REINFORCING TABLE &03 RISER A %REINFORCING **BEARING PRESSURE (PSF) 24" 4'X4'26"#5 @ 12" OCEW #5 @ 12" OCEW 2,410 1,780 30" 4'-6" X 4'-6"32"#5 @ 12" OCEW #5 @ 12" OCEW 2,120 1,530 36" 5' X 5'38"#5 @ 10" OCEW #5 @ 10" OCEW 1,890 1,350 42" 5'-6" X 5'-6"44"#5 @ 10" OCEW #5 @ 9" OCEW 1,720 1,210 48" 6' X 6'50"#5 @ 9" OCEW #5 @ 8" OCEW 1,600 1,100 ** ASSUMED SOIL BEARING CAPACITY1'-0"A 2" COV E R (TYP.)2" C O V E R (TYP) 7. TRIM OPENING WITH DIAGONAL #4 BARS, EXTEND BARS A MINIMUM OF 12" BEYOND OPENING, BEND BARS AS REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN BAR COVER. 8. PROTECTION SLAB AND ALL MATERIALS TO BE PROVIDED AND INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR. 9. DETAIL DESIGN BY DELTA ENGINEERING, BINGHAMTON, NY. % TYPICAL CMP ACCESS MANHOLE City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4b) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments for Arlington Row Apartments East PUD Page 19 LOUCKS W:\2015\15186.0A\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\EAST SITE\C8-2 CITY DETAILPlotted: 02 /24 / 2016 9:28 AM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. CADD QUALIFICATION SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL Arlington Row Apartments East St. Louis Park, MN Melrose Company 22375 Murray Street Excelsior, MN 55331 01/15/16 CITY SUBMITTAL 02/05/16 CITY RESUBMITTAL 02/25/16 CITY RESUBMITTAL C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C1-2 PRELIMINARY PLAT C1-3 PRELIMINARY PLAT C2-1 SITE PLAN C3-1 GRADING PLAN C3-2, C3-3 & C3-4 SWPPP C4-1 SANITARY & WATERMAIN C4-2 STORM SEWER C8-1 DETAILS C8-2 CITY DETAILS L1-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2-1 TREE INVENTORY PLAN CITY DETAILS C8-2 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. PJ Disch - PE 49933 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. 07/10/2015 15186A MJS PJD PJD City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4b) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments for Arlington Row Apartments East PUD Page 20 1 BO 1 BO 1 BO 4 HC 3 SH 3 AG 3 BL 19 FD 4 SJ 6 MS 3 DH 3 BH 3 BH 3 DH 3 DH 7 CE 2 BH2 BH 8 MS 6 DH 8 CE 8 LS 10 LS 6 SJ 7 EH 6 EH 5 BJ 4 FG 6 PS 9 SD 4 FG 3 EH 3 BJ 7 SG 3 BJ 6 EH 6 SG 6 FG 7 EH 4 BJ 8 FG 8 SG 4 BJ 7 SG 2 GS 2 GS 2 GS 1 PE 2 PE 2 HC 5 AP 4 BS 24 SJ DECIDUOUS TREES QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME CONT SIZE AG 3 AUTUMN GOLD GINKGO Ginkgo biloba `Autumn Gold`B & B 2.5"Cal BO 3 BICOLOR OAK Quercus bicolor B & B 2.5"Cal BL 3 BOULEVARD LINDEN Tilia americana `Boulevard`B & B 2.5"Cal PE 3 PRINCETON ELM Ulmus americana `Princeton`B & B 2.5"Cal SH 3 SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST Gleditsia triacanthos `Skycole`B & B 2.5"Cal EVERGREEN TREES QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME CONT SIZE AP 5 AUSTRIAN PINE Pinus nigra B & B 6` HGT BS 4 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE Picea glauca `Densata`B & B 6` HGT ORNAMENTAL TREES QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME CONT SIZE HC 6 HARVEST GOLD CRABAPPLE Malus x `Harvest Gold`B & B 1.5"Cal SHRUBS QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME MIN CONT MIN SIZE SPACING DH 15 DWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLE Diervilla lonicera 5 gal 18" HGT 42" o.c. EH 29 ENDLESS SUMMER HYDRANGEA Hydrangea macrophylla `Endless Summer` TM 5 gal 24" HGT 48" o.c. FD 19 FIREDANCE DOGWOOD Cornus sericea `Bailadeline`5 gal 24" HGT 60" o.c. GS 6 GRO-LOW FRAGRANT SUMAC Rhus aromatica `Gro-Low`5 gal 24" SPRD 72" o.c. LS 18 LITTLE PRINCESS SPIREA Spirea japonica `Little Princess`5 gal 24" HGT 36" o.c. MS 14 MARLEEN SNOWBERRY Symphoricarpos x doorenbosii `Marleen` 5 gal 24" HGT 42" o.c. CONIFEROUS SHRUBS QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME MIN CONT MIN SIZE SPACING BJ 19 BLUE RUG JUNIPER Juniperus horizontalis `Wiltonii`5 gal 24" SPRD 60" o.c. CE 15 CANADALE GOLD EUONYMUS Euonymus fortunei `Canadale Gold`5 gal 24" SPRD 42" o.c. SJ 34 SEA GREEN JUNIPER Juniperus chinensis `Sea Green`5 gal 24" HGT 60" o.c. PERENNIALS QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME MIN CONT MIN SIZE SPACING BH 10 BLUE ANGEL HOSTA Hosta `Blue Angel`1 gal 36" o.c. FG 22 FEATHER REED GRASS Calamagrostis x acutiflora `Karl Foerster`1 gal 30" o.c. PS 6 PURPLE EMPEROR SEDUM Sedum `Purple Emperor`1 gal 24" o.c. SG 28 SHENANDOAH SWITCH GRASS Panicum virgatum `Shenendoah`1 gal 30" o.c. SD 9 STELLA D` ORO DAYLILY Hemerocallis x `Stella de Oro`1 gal 24" o.c. PLANT SCHEDULE LOUCKS W:\2015\15186.0A\CADD DATA\LANDSCAPE\_dwg Sheet Files\East\L1-1Plotted: 02 /24 / 2016 9:32 AM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. CADD QUALIFICATION SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL Arlington Row Apartments East St. Louis Park, MN Melrose Company 22375 Murray Street Excelsior, MN 55331 01/15/16 CITY SUBMITTAL 02/05/16 CITY RESUBMITTAL 02/25/16 CITY RESUBMITTAL C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C1-2 PRELIMINARY PLAT C1-3 PRELIMINARY PLAT C2-1 SITE PLAN C3-1 GRADING PLAN C3-2, C3-3 & C3-4 SWPPP C4-1 SANITARY & WATERMAIN C4-2 STORM SEWER C8-1 DETAILS C8-2 CITY DETAILS L1-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2-1 TREE INVENTORY PLAN LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION: COORDINATE THE PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION AND PLANTING INSTALLATION WITH OTHER CONTRACTORS WORKING ON SITE. NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL COMPLETE GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. WHERE SOD/SEED ABUTS PAVED SURFACES, FINISHED GRADE OF SOD/SEED SHALL BE HELD 1" BELOW SURFACE ELEVATION OF TRAIL, SLAB, CURB, ETC. SEED ALL AREAS DISTURBED DUE TO GRADING OTHER THAN THOSE AREAS NOTED TO RECEIVE SOD. SEED SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MULCHED AS PER MNDOT SPECS. SOD ALL DESIGNATED AREAS DISTURBED DUE TO GRADING. SOD SHALL BE LAID PARALLEL TO THE CONTOURS AND SHALL HAVE STAGGERED JOINTS. ON SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 OR IN DRAINAGE SWALES, THE SOD SHALL BE STAKED TO THE GROUND. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, ALL SHRUBS SHALL HAVE AT LEAST 5 CANES AT THE SPECIFIED MINIMUM SHRUB HEIGHT OR WIDTH. ORNAMENTAL TREES SHALL HAVE NO V CROTCHES AND SHALL BEGIN BRANCHING NO LOWER THAN 3' ABOVE ROOT BALL. STREET AND BOULEVARD TREES SHALL BEGIN BRANCHING NO LOWER THAN 5' ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. ANY CONIFEROUS TREE PREVIOUSLY PRUNED FOR CHRISTMAS TREE SALES SHALL NOT BE USED. ALL CONIFEROUS TREES SHALL BE FULL FORM, NATURAL TO THE SPECIES, WITHOUT PRUNING. PLAN TAKES PRECEDENCE OVER PLANT SCHEDULE IF DISCREPANCIES IN QUANTITIES EXIST. SPECIFICATIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER NOTES. NO PLANT MATERIAL SUBSTITUTIONS WILL BE ACCEPTED UNLESS APPROVAL IS REQUESTED OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF A BID AND/OR QUOTATION. ALL PROPOSED PLANTS SHALL BE LOCATED AND STAKED AS SHOWN ON PLAN. ADJUSTMENTS IN LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLANT MATERIALS MAY BE NEEDED IN FIELD. SHOULD AN ADJUSTMENT BE ADVISED, THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST BE NOTIFIED. ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE FERTILIZED UPON INSTALLATION WITH A 27-3-3 SLOW RELEASE FERTILIZER MIXED IN WITH THE PLANTING SOIL PER THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. PLANTS MAY BE TREATED FOR SUMMER AND FALL INSTALLATION WITH AN APPLICATION OF GRANULAR 27-3-3 AT 6 OZ PER 2.5" CALIPER PER TREE AND 3 OZ PER SHRUB WITH AN ADDITIONAL APPLICATION OF 27-3-3 THE FOLLOWING SPRING IN THE TREE SAUCER. ALL PLANTING AREAS RECEIVING GROUND COVER, PERENNIALS, ANNUALS, AND/OR VINES SHALL RECEIVE A MINIMUM OF 12" DEPTH OF PLANTING SOIL CONSISTING OF AT LEAST 45 PARTS TOPSOIL, 45 PARTS PEAT OR MANURE AND 10 PARTS SAND. ALL PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER PLANTING DETAILS. REMOVE ALL FLAGGING AND LABELS FROM PLANTS. WRAPPING MATERIAL SHALL BE CORRUGATED PVC PIPING 1" GREATER IN CALIPER THAN THE TREE BEING PROTECTED OR QUALITY, HEAVY, WATERPROOF CREPE PAPER MANUFACTURED FOR THIS PURPOSE. WRAP ALL DECIDUOUS TREES PLANTED IN THE FALL PRIOR TO 12-1 AND REMOVE ALL WRAPPING AFTER 5-1. BLACK METAL EDGER TO BE USED TO CONTAIN SHRUBS, PERENNIALS, AND ANNUALS WHERE BED MEETS SOD/SEED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. ALL ANNUAL AND PERENNIAL PLANTING BEDS TO RECEIVE 3" DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH WITH NO WEED BARRIER. ALL SHRUB BED MASSINGS TO RECEIVE 3" DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH AND FIBER MAT WEED BARRIER. ALL TREES TO RECEIVE 4" DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH WITH NO MULCH IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH TREE TRUNK. SPREAD GRANULAR PRE EMERGENT HERBICIDE (PREEN OR EQUAL) PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS UNDER ALL MULCHED AREAS. MAINTENANCE STRIPS TO HAVE EDGER AND MULCH AS SPECIFIED/INDICATED ON DRAWING OR IN SPECIFICATION. IF THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS CONCERNED OR PERCEIVES ANY DEFICIENCIES IN THE PLANT SELECTIONS, SOIL CONDITIONS OR ANY OTHER SITE CONDITION WHICH MIGHT NEGATIVELY AFFECT PLANT ESTABLISHMENT, SURVIVAL OR GUARANTEE, HE MUST BRING THESE DEFICIENCIES TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO PROCUREMENT AND/OR INSTALLATION. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A WRITTEN REQUEST FOR THE OWNER ACCEPTANCE INSPECTION OF ALL LANDSCAPE AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ON-GOING MAINTENANCE OF ALL NEWLY INSTALLED MATERIALS UNTIL TIME OF OWNER ACCEPTANCE. ANY ACTS OF VANDALISM OR DAMAGE WHICH MAY OCCUR PRIOR TO OWNER ACCEPTANCE SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH A MAINTENANCE PROGRAM INCLUDING, BUT NOT NECESSARILY LIMITED TO, PRUNING, FERTILIZATION AND DISEASE/PEST CONTROL. CONTRACTOR SHALL GUARANTEE NEW PLANT MATERIAL THROUGH ONE CALENDAR YEAR FROM THE DATE OF OWNER ACCEPTANCE. WARRANTY (ONE FULL GROWING SEASON) FOR LANDSCAPE MATERIALS SHALL BEGIN ON THE DATE OF ACCEPTANCE BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AFTER THE COMPLETION OF PLANTING OF ALL LANDSCAPE MATERIALS. NO PARTIAL ACCEPTANCE WILL BE CONSIDERED. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE THE APPROPRIATE DATES FOR SPRING PLANT MATERIAL INSTALLATION AND SEED/SOD PLACEMENT IS FROM THE TIME GROUND HAS THAWED TO JUNE 15. FALL SODDING IS GENERALLY ACCEPTABLE FROM AUGUST 15 - NOVEMBER 1. FALL SEEDING FROM AUGUST 15 - SEPTEMBER 15; DORMANT SEEDING IN THE FALL SHALL NOT OCCUR PRIOR TO NOVEMBER 1. FALL CONIFEROUS PLANTING MAY OCCUR FROM AUGUST 15 - OCTOBER 1 AND DECIDUOUS PLANTING FROM THE FIRST FROST UNTIL NOVEMBER 15. PLANTING OUTSIDE THESE DATES IS NOT RECOMMENDED. ANY ADJUSTMENT MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. PROTECT ALL EXISTING OAKS ON SITE SCHEDULED TO REMAIN. IF EXISTING OAKS ARE DAMAGED IN ANY MANNER, ABOVE OR BELOW GROUND IN THE ROOT SYSTEM, AN ASPHALTIC TREE PRUNING PAINT SHOULD BE APPLIED IMMEDIATELY AFTER WOUNDING. OAKS ARE NOT TO BE PRUNED, REMOVED OR TRANSPLANTED BETWEEN APRIL 15 AND JULY 1. NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IF THESE DATES ARE UNAVOIDABLE. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL ESTABLISH TO HIS SATISFACTION THAT SOIL AND COMPACTION CONDITIONS ARE ADEQUATE TO ALLOW FOR PROPER DRAINAGE AT AND AROUND THE BUILDING SITE. IRRIGATION NOTES: VERIFY EXISTING/PROPOSED IRRIGATION SYSTEM LAYOUT AND CONFIRM COMPLETE LIMITS OF IRRIGATION PRIOR TO SUPPLYING SHOP DRAWINGS. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AN IRRIGATION LAYOUT PLAN AND SPECIFICATION AS A PART OF THE SCOPE OF WORK WHEN BIDDING. THESE SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO ORDER AND/OR INSTALLATION. IT SHALL BE THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO INSURE THAT ALL SODDED/SEEDED AND PLANTED AREAS ARE IRRIGATED PROPERLY, INCLUDING THOSE AREAS DIRECTLY AROUND AND ABUTTING BUILDING FOUNDATION. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH AN IRRIGATION SCHEDULE APPROPRIATE TO THE PROJECT SITE CONDITIONS AND TO PLANT MATERIAL GROWTH REQUIREMENTS. IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS NOT TO SPRINKLE ACROSS PAVEMENT. THE SYSTEM SHALL INCORPORATE A RAIN SENSOR INTO IRRIGATION SYSTEM. PLANTINGS OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF IRRIGATION ARE TO BE WATERED REGULARLY UNTIL PLANTING/SOD/SEED HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. N Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Timothy J. Fedie - LA 48303 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.15186A MJS TJF TJF LANDSCAPE PLAN: DORA CALCULATIONS: SITE AREA = 39,967 SQ.FT. DORA REQUIRED (12% OF SITE AREA) = 4,796 SQ.FT. DORA PROPOSED = 5,651 SQ.FT. OR 14% (MARKED ON PLAN WITH HATCH) PLANTING DETAILS: LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS: 1 TREE PER UNIT (ORNAMENTALS AT 2:1 RATIO) 6 SHRUBS PER 1,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA PROPOSED UNITS = 27 GROSS FLOOR AREA = 28,088 SF TREES REQUIRED = 27 TREES PROPOSED = 15 OVERSTORY, 9 CONIFEROUS, 6 ORNAMENTAL SHRUBS REQUIRED = 169 SHRUBS PROPOSED = 169 TREE MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS = 48 CALIPER INCHES TOTAL PROPOSED = 69 CALIPER INCHES LANDSCAPE PLAN L1-1 City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4b) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments for Arlington Row Apartments East PUD Page 21 LOUCKS W:\2015\15186.0A\CADD DATA\LANDSCAPE\_dwg Sheet Files\East\L2-1Plotted: 02 /24 / 2016 9:33 AM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. CADD QUALIFICATION SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL Arlington Row Apartments East St. Louis Park, MN Melrose Company 22375 Murray Street Excelsior, MN 55331 01/15/16 CITY SUBMITTAL 02/05/16 CITY RESUBMITTAL 02/25/16 CITY RESUBMITTAL C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C1-2 PRELIMINARY PLAT C1-3 PRELIMINARY PLAT C2-1 SITE PLAN C3-1 GRADING PLAN C3-2, C3-3 & C3-4 SWPPP C4-1 SANITARY & WATERMAIN C4-2 STORM SEWER C8-1 DETAILS C8-2 CITY DETAILS L1-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2-1 TREE INVENTORY PLAN N Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Timothy J. Fedie - LA 48303 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.15186A MJS TJF TJF TREE INVENTORY PLAN: TREE MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS: TOTAL CALIPER INCHES = 40 CALIPER INCHES TO BE REMOVED = 40 CALIPER INCHES TO BE SAVED = 0 ((40/40)-0.2) x 1.5 x 40 = 48 48 CALIPER INCHES REQUIRED FOR MITIGATION REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR QUANTITY AND LOCATION OF PROPOSED TREES. TREE INVENTORY PLAN L2-1 City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4b) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments for Arlington Row Apartments East PUD Page 22 1 A3.42 A3.4 A B C D 2 1 A A3.0 C A3.0 B A3.0 E F G H 1 A3.2 2 A3.2 2 A3.3 1 A3.3 2 A3.0 1 A3.0 /1 A1.2/1 A1.4 23' - 1 1/8"36' - 4 1/4"23' - 1 1/8"22' - 0"23' - 1 1/8"72' - 4 1/4"23' - 1 1/8" 223' - 1"44' - 7 1/2"7' - 1 3/4"7' - 8 3/8"5' - 6 1/4"9' - 2 1/4"2 BED 1A 1A/A8.2 B - 1 - 01 2 BED 1Aa 1/A8.7 B - 1 - 13 2 BED (2 STORY) 1B 1/A8.1 B - 1 - 02 2 BED 1Ab 1/A8.8 B - 1 - 03 2 BED (2 STORY) 1Ba 1/A8.6 B - 1 - 04 2 BED (2 STORY) 1Ba 1/A8.6 B - 1 - 05 1 BED 1C 2/A8.2 B - 1 - 06 1 BED 1C 2/A8.2 B - 1 - 07 1 BED 1C 2/A8.2 B - 1 - 08 COMMON B - 1 - 108 BIKE STOR. / SERVICEB - 1 - 1092 BED 1Aa 1/A8.7 B - 1 - 11 2 BED 1A 1A/A8.2 B - 1 - 10 2 BED (2 STORY) 1B 1/A8.1 B - 1 - 09 RESTROOM B - 1 - 110 STORAGE B - 1 - 111 VESTIBULE - B - 1 - 101 VESTIBULE - B - 1 - 100 LOBBY - LOBBY B - 1 - 102 DW4 2 B 1 8 Fw4 1 MAIL AND PACKAGE BOXES 6' - 2 3/8"4' - 6"1' - 10 5/8"2 1/8" 18' - 2 1/8" 2 1/8"2 1/8" 2 1/8"2 1/8"24' - 0"24' - 0"24' - 0" 4' - 6"6' - 2 3/8"1' - 10 5/8"16' - 8 1/8"18' - 0 1/8" A8.6 1 A8.7 1 A8.8 1 1 A3.42 A3.4 A B C D 2 1 A A3.0 C A3.0 B A3.0 E F G H 1 A3.2 2 A3.2 2 A3.3 1 A3.3 2 A3.0 1 A3.0 /1 A1.5/1 A1.6 23' - 1 1/8"36' - 4 1/4"23' - 1 1/8"22' - 0"23' - 1 1/8"72' - 4 1/4"23' - 1 1/8" 223' - 1"44' - 7 1/2"7' - 9"5' - 2 3/4"2' - 0"18' - 0"2' - 0"8' - 8 1/4"4' - 10 7/16"7' - 1 3/4"8' - 0 13/16"TRELLIS WITH LED STRING LIGHTS PROVIDE POWER AND INTERIOR CONTROLS 18' - 0" 18' - 0"2 1/8"18' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0" 2 1/8"24' - 0"24' - 0"24' - 2 1/8"1' - 6"19' - 5 1/8"6' - 1 1/4"19' - 1 1/8"1' - 6"20' - 5 1/8"5' - 1 1/4"19' - 1 1/8"5 1/2"5 1/2"3' - 4"2 BED (2 STORY) 2B 1/A8.5 B - 2 - 01 1 BED (2 STORY) 2Ca 1/A8.10 B - 2 - 03 2 BED (2 STORY) 2Ba 1/A8.9 B - 2 - 06 1 BED (2 STORY) 2C 1/A8.3 B - 2 - 022 BED (2 STORY) 1B 2/A8.1 B - 2 - 2 BED (2 STORY) 1Ba 2/A8.6 B - 2 - - 1 BED (2 STORY) 2C 1/A8.3 B - 2 - 04 2 BED (2 STORY) 1Ba 2/A8.6 B - 2 - 2 BED (2 STORY) 2Ba 1/A8.9 B - 2 - 07 2 BED (2 STORY) 2A 1/A8.4 B - 2 - 08 2 BED (2 STORY) 2A 1/A8.4 B - 2 - 10 1 BED (2 STORY) 2C 1/A8.3 B - 2 - 09 1 BED (2 STORY) 2C 1/A8.3 B - 2 - 11 1 BED (2 STORY) 2C 1/A8.3 B - 2 - 12 2 BED (2 STORY) 1B 2/A8.1 B - 2 - - 1 BED (2 STORY) 2C 1/A8.3 B - 2 - 14 2 BED (2 STORY) 2B 1/A8.5 B - 2 - 152 BED (2 STORY) 2A 1/A8.4 B - 2 - 13 CIRCULATION B - 2 - 200 CIRCULATION B - 2 - 200 1 BED (2 STORY) 2Ca 1/A8.10 B - 2 - 05 8(EQ) A8.6 2 A8.9 1A8.10 1 elness swenson graham architects 500 washington avenue south m inneapolis m innesota 55415 p. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 5 0 8 f. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 3 8 2 w w w . e s g a r c h . c o m I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or re p ort was prepared by m e or under m y direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of M innesota Signature Typed or Printed Nam e License # Date PROJECT NUM BER D RAW N BY CHECKED BY O RIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIO NS KE Y PLAN N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T IO N **D R A F T **2/25/2016 4:46:19 PMA1.0 FLOOR PLAN 215515 Author Checker 10/26/15 ARLINGTON ROW - 13TH STREET SITE ARLINGTON ROW - 13TH STREET SITE PUD / COM P PLAN - 2/25/2016 B 3/32" = 1'-0"A1.0 1 FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - OVERALL 3/32" = 1'-0"A1.0 2 SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - OVERALL No.De s cription Date City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4b) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments for Arlington Row Apartments East PUD Page 23 1 A3.42 A3.4 A B C D 2 1 A A3.0 C A3.0 B A3.0 E F G H 1 A3.2 2 A3.2 2 A3.3 1 A3.3 2 A3.0 1 A3.0 /1 A1.7/1 A1.8 23' - 1 1/8"36' - 4 1/4"23' - 1 1/8"22' - 0"23' - 1 1/8"72' - 4 1/4"23' - 1 1/8" 223' - 1"44' - 7 1/2"7' - 8 3/8"2' - 0"18' - 0"2' - 0"7' - 1 3/4"2 BED (2 STORY) 2B 1/A8.5 B - - 1 BED (2 STORY) 2Ca 2/A8.10 B - - 1 BED (2 STORY) 2Ca 2/A8.10 B - - 1 BED (2 STORY) 2C 1/A8.3 B - - 1 BED (2 STORY) 2C 1/A8.3 B - - 2 BED (2 STORY) 2Ba -- B - - 2 BED (2 STORY) 2Ba 2/A8.9 B - - 2 BED (2 STORY) 2A 1/A8.4 B - - 2 BED (2 STORY) 2A 1/A8.4 B - - 2 BED (2 STORY) 2A 1/A8.4 B - - 2 BED (2 STORY) 2B 1/A8.5 B - - 1 BED (2 STORY) 2C 1/A8.3 B - - 1 BED (2 STORY) 2C 1/A8.3 B - - 1 BED (2 STORY) 2C 1/A8.3 B - - 1 BED (2 STORY) 2C 1/A8.3 B - - 18' - 2 1/8"18' - 0" 18' - 2 1/8"18' - 2 1/8" 2 1/8"24' - 0"24' - 0" 2' - 6"2' - 6"25' - 2 3/8"25' - 4 1/2"UNOCCUPIED ATTIC UNOCCUPIED ATTIC UNOCCUPIED ATTIC UNOCCUPIED ATTIC 13' - 2 3/8" 4' - 9 5/8" 13' - 2 3/8" SCUPPER WITH DOWNSPOUT TO ROOF BELOW VALLEY OF SLOPED TPO ROOFING BELOW WOOD DECK ALUMINUM SCREEN DOORS AT UNIT PATIOS CEDAR SCREEN WALL A8.10 2 A8.9 2 A B C D 2 1 DOWNSPOUT DOWNSPOUT DOWNSPOUT DOWNSPOUT DOWNSPOUTDOWNSPOUT DOWNSPOUT DOWNSPOUT E F G H 44' - 7 1/2"7' - 1 3/4"A.A1.4 1 12" / 12"12" / 12"7" / 12"12" / 12"12" / 12"4" / 12"12" / 12"12" / 12"12" / 12"3 3/4" / 12"12" / 12"12" / 12"7" / 12"12" / 12"12" / 12"12" / 12"12" / 12" 12" / 12"12" / 12"4" / 12"12" / 12"12" / 12"12" / 12"3 3/4" / 12"7" / 12"12" / 12"12" / 12"12" / 12"12" / 12"12" / 12"12" / 12"12" / 12"12" / 12"7" / 12"12" / 12"12" / 12"12" / 12"12" / 12"12" / 12"12" / 12" VALLEY FLASHING / ASSEMBLY •32" GALVANIZED METAL VALLEY FLASHING •SELF ADHERING & SELF HEALING NON GRANULATED ICE AND WATER SHIELD, (VERIFY WITH SHINGLE WARRANTY) •EXTEND MIN 42" EACH SIDE OF CENTERLINE OF VALLEY •PROVIDE MIN 6" LAP BETWEEN ALL LAYERS OF ICE AND WATER SHIELD •INSTALL SHINGLES IN 'WEAVE' FASHION •DO NOT PENETRATE / FASTEN WITHIN 12" EACH INSIDE OF VALLEY EAVE & RAKE •DRIP EDGE •SELF ADHERING & SELF HEALING NON GRANULATED ICE AND WATER SHIELD, (VERIFY WITH SHINGLE WARRANTY) •EXTEND MIN 36" BEYOND PERIMETER OF BUILDING ENVELOPE •PROVIDE MIN 6" LAP BETWEEN ALL LAYERS OF ICE AND WATER SHEILD ROOF TO WALL CONDITION ALONG SLOPE •WRAP ICE AND WATER SHIELD UP MIN 24" VERTICAL ON ADJACENT WALLS •ICE AND WATER SHIELD MIN 36" OUT FROM FACE OF WALL •8" X 8" STEP FLASHING AT ALL ROOF TO WALL CONDITIONS •KICK OUT FLASHING AT TERMINATION / END •INSTALL WEATHER BARRIER AND COUNTER FLASH OVER VERTICAL STEP FLASHING •SEE ELEVATIONS FOR WALL FINISH 15' - 6"15' - 6"15' - 6" 15' - 2 3/8"15' - 2 3/8"15' - 2 3/8"15' - 2 3/8"15' - 2 3/8"15' - 2 3/8" 15' - 2 3/8"15' - 2 3/8" 1' - 2 1/2"2' - 6"1' - 0"1' - 2 1/4" 3' - 7 3/4" 1' - 0"2' - 6"1' - 0"3' - 0 1/4"3' - 2 1/4"3' - 2 1/4" 3' - 7 3/4" 1' - 2 1/4"1' - 0 1/4"1' - 2 1/2"2' - 6"1' - 0"1' - 0"2' - 6"1' - 0"1' - 2 1/2"3' - 0 1/4"elness swenson graham architects 500 washington avenue south m inneapolis m innesota 55415 p. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 5 0 8 f. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 3 8 2 w w w . e s g a r c h . c o m I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or re p ort was prepared by m e or under m y direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of M innesota Signature Typed or Printed Nam e License # Date PROJECT NUM BER D RAW N BY CHECKED BY O RIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIO NS KE Y PLAN N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T IO N **D R A F T **2/25/2016 4:46:20 PMA1.1 FLOOR PLAN 215515 ESG ESG ARLINGTON ROW - 13TH STREET SITE ARLINGTON ROW - 13TH STREET SITE PUD / COM P PLAN - 2/25/2016 B 3/32" = 1'-0"A1.1 1 BP-03 - LEVEL 3 - OVERALL 3/32" = 1'-0"A1.1 2 LEVEL 4 - TOP PLT (ROOF) No.De s cription Date City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4b) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments for Arlington Row Apartments East PUD Page 24 CLASS 1 MATERIAL 5175sf 80% CLASS 2 MATERIAL 1315 sf 20% CLASS 1 MATERIAL 5171 sf 74% CLASS 2 MATERIAL 1843 sf 26% CLASS 2 MATERIAL 248 sf 18% CLASS 1 MATERIAL 1181 sf 82% LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 109' - 11" LEVEL 0 - TOP OF FTG 95' - 0" LEVEL 3 119' - 10" LEVEL 4 - TOP PLT 128' - 5 1/4"8' - 7 1/4"9' - 11"9' - 11"5' - 0"30 YR ARCHITECTURAL LAMINATED SHINGLES10A BRICK / MASONRY - TYPE 11A B5 B5 /1 A3.3 /2 A3.3 BRICK / MASONRY - TYPE 11A CEMENT PLASTER / STUCCO7 FIBERCEMENT LAP SIDING 4"6A BRICK / MASONRY - TYPE 21BILLUMINATED BUILDING SIGN BRICK / MASONRY - TYPE 11A FIBERCEMENT LAP SIDING 4"6A ?? LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 109' - 11" LEVEL 0 - TOP OF FTG 95' - 0" LEVEL 3 119' - 10" LEVEL 4 - TOP PLT 128' - 5 1/4" /1 A3.2 /2 A3.2 FIBERCEMENT LAP SIDING 4"6A 30 YR ARCHITECTURAL LAMINATED SHINGLES10A BRICK / MASONRY - TYPE 11A CEMENT PLASTER / STUCCO7 CEMENT PLASTER / STUCCO7 FIBERCEMENT LAP SIDING 4"6A BRICK / MASONRY - TYPE 11ABRICK / MASONRY - TYPE 21B FIBERCEMENT LAP SIDING 4"6AFIBERCEMENT LAP SIDING 4"6A CEMENT PLASTER / STUCCO7 elness swenson graham architects 500 washington avenue south m inneapolis m innesota 55415 p. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 5 0 8 f. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 3 8 2 w w w . e s g a r c h . c o m I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or re p ort was prepared by m e or under m y direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of M innesota Signature Typed or Printed Nam e License # Date PROJECT NUM BER D RAW N BY CHECKED BY O RIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIO NS KE Y PLAN N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T IO N **D R A F T **2/25/2016 4:47:06 PMA3.0 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - OVERALL 215515 ESG ESG ARLINGTON ROW - 13TH STREET SITE ARLINGTON ROW - 13TH STREET SITE PUD / COM P PLAN - 2/25/2016 B 1/16" = 1'-0"A3.0 A SOUTH ELEVATION - Material Area 1/16" = 1'-0"A3.0 B NORTH ELEVATION - Material Area 1/16" = 1'-0"A3.0 C EAST ELEVATION (WEST MIRRORED) - Material Area 3/32" = 1'-0"A3.0 1 SOUTH ELEVATION - OVERALL 3/32" = 1'-0"A3.0 2 NORTH ELEVATION - OVERALL No.De s cription Date City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4b) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments for Arlington Row Apartments East PUD Page 25 LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 109' - 11" LEVEL 0 - TOP OF FTG 95' - 0" LEVEL 3 119' - 10" LEVEL 4 - TOP PLT 128' - 5 1/4" 100' - 0" 20 8' - 7 1/4"9' - 11"9' - 11"5' - 0"CEMENT PLASTER / STUCCO7 BRICK / MASONRY - TYPE 1 - SOLDIER1A.1 30 YR ARCHITECTURAL LAMINATED SHINGLES10A FIBERCEMENT LAP SIDING 4"6A CEMENT PLASTER / STUCCO7 BRICK / MASONRY - TYPE 11A BRICK / MASONRY - TYPE 21B FIBERCEMENT LAP SIDING 4"6A 30 YR ARCHITECTURAL LAMINATED SHINGLES10A CEMENT PLASTER / STUCCO7 BRICK / MASONRY - TYPE 11A LEVEL 1 100' - 0" CEMENT PLASTER / STUCCO7 BRICK / MASONRY - TYPE 11A elness swenson graham architects 500 washington avenue south m inneapolis m innesota 55415 p. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 5 0 8 f. 6 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 3 8 2 w w w . e s g a r c h . c o m I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or re p ort was prepared by m e or under m y direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of M innesota Signature Typed or Printed Nam e License # Date PROJECT NUM BER D RAW N BY CHECKED BY O RIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIO NS KE Y PLAN N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T IO N **D R A F T **2/25/2016 4:47:39 PMA3.4 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 215515 Author Checker 04/09/15 ARLINGTON ROW - 13TH STREET SITE ARLINGTON ROW - 13TH STREET SITE PUD / COM P PLAN - 2/25/2016 B 3/16" = 1'-0"A3.4 1 EAST ELEVATION REF SHEET A-A3.3 UNO 3/16" = 1'-0"A3.4 2 WEST ELEVATION - REF SHEET A-A3.3 UNO No.De s cription Date City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4b) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments for Arlington Row Apartments East PUD Page 26 City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4b) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments for Arlington Row Apartments East PUDPage 27 SCALE IN FEET 0 30 N LOUCKS KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS : That Arlington Row, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, fee owner of the following described property situated in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, to wit: That part of Lot 2, Block 1, "Penn-Zayta", lying southerly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the west line of said Lot 2, distant 112.56 feet northerly of the southwest corner thereof; thence easterly to a point on the east line of said Lot 2, distant 113.07 feet northerly of the southeast corner thereof and there terminating. AND That part of Lot 3, Block 1, "Penn-Zayta", lying southerly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the west line of said Lot 3, distant 113.07 feet northerly of the southwest corner thereof; thence easterly to a point on the east line of said Lot 3, distant 113.58 feet northerly of the southeast corner thereof and there terminating. AND That part of Lot 4, Block 1, "Penn-Zayta", lying southerly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the west line of said Lot 4, distant 113.58 feet northerly of the southwest corner thereof; thence easterly to a point on the east line of said Lot 4, distant 114.09 feet northerly of the southeast corner thereof and there terminating. AND That part of Lot 5, Block 1, "Penn-Zayta", lying southerly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the west line of said Lot 5, distant 114.09 feet northerly of the southwest corner thereof; thence easterly to a point on the east line of said Lot 5, distant 114.60 feet northerly of the southeast corner thereof and there terminating. AND That part of Lot 6, Block 1, "Penn-Zayta", lying southerly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the west line of said Lot 6, distant 114.60 feet northerly of the southwest corner thereof; thence easterly to a point on the east line of said Lot 6, distant 115.11 feet northerly of the southeast corner thereof and there terminating. AND That part of Lot 7, Block 1, "Penn-Zayta", lying southerly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the west line of said Lot 7, distant 115.11 feet northerly of the southwest corner thereof; thence easterly to a point on the east line of said Lot 7, distant 115.62 feet northerly of the southeast corner thereof and there terminating. AND That part of Lot 8, Block 1, "Penn-Zayta", lying southerly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the west line of said Lot 8, distant 115.62 feet northerly of the southwest corner thereof; thence easterly to a point on the east line of said Lot 8, distant 116.13 feet northerly of the southeast corner thereof and there terminating. Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as ARLINGTON ROW APARTMENTS EAST, and does hereby dedicate to the public for public use forever the easements for drainage and utility purposes as shown on this plat. In witness whereof said Arlington Row, LLC has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this ______ day of ____________________, 201_____. ARLINGTON ROW, LLC _________________________________________ (Signature) _________________________________________ (Title) State of ______________ County of ______________ This instrument was acknowledged before me this ______ day of ____________________, 201_____ by _____________________, _________________________ of Arlington Row, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. _________________________________________ (Signature) _________________________________________ (Printed Name) Notary Public ____________________ County, _______________ My Commission Expires January 31, 20_____ SURVEYORS CERTIFICATION I, Paul J. McGinley do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. Dated this ______ day of __________________, 201____ __________________________________ Paul J. McGinley, Licensed Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 16099 State of Minnesota County of Hennepin This instrument was acknowledged before me this ______ day of __________________, 201_____ by Paul J. McGinley, a Licensed Land Surveyor. _________________________________________ (Signature) _________________________________________ (Printed Name) Notary Public ____________________ County, Minnesota My Commission Expires January 31, 202____ ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA This plat of ARLINGTON ROW APARTMENTS EAST was approved and accepted by the City Council of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, at a regular meeting thereof held this ______ day of _________________, 201_____. If applicable, the written comments and recommendations of the Commissioner of Transportation and the County Highway Engineer have been received by the City or the prescribed 30 day period has elapsed without receipt of such comments and recommendations, as provided by Minn. Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. CITY COUNCIL OF ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA By __________________________________, Mayor By______________________________, Clerk RESIDENT AND REAL ESTATE SERVICES , Hennepin County, Minnesota I hereby certify that taxes payable in 201_____ and prior years have been paid for land described on this plat, dated this ________ day of ____________________, 201_____. Mark V. Chapin, Hennepin County Auditor By ________________________________, Deputy SURVEY DIVISION , Hennepin County, Minnesota Pursuant to MN. STAT. Sec. 383B.565 (1969) this plat has been approved this ________ day of ______________________, 201_____. Chris F. Mavis, Hennepin County Surveyor By _________________________________ REGISTRAR OF TITLES , Hennepin County, Minnesota I hereby certify that the within plat of ARLINGTON ROW APARTMENTS EAST was filed in this office this ________ day of _____________________, 201_____, at ________o'clock __M. Martin McCormick, Registrar of Titles By ________________________________ Deputy City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4b) Title: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Amendments for Arlington Row Apartments East PUD Page 28 Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 4, 2016 Consent Agenda Item: 4c EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Ratification of the EDA’s MIF Application to DEED on behalf of MoneyGram RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution ratifying the EDA’s application to Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) for Minnesota Investment Funds (MIF) on behalf of MoneyGram. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council support the EDA being designated as the applicant for MoneyGram’s Minnesota Investment Fund (MIF) application to the Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) and administrator of the awarded loan funds? SUMMARY: During 2015, staff coordinated with MoneyGram on an application to the Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) for Minnesota Investment Funds (MIF) to partially finance the expansion of MoneyGram’s offices at 1550 Utica. On December 21, 2015, the EDA held a public hearing and adopted a resolution supporting the submission of a Minnesota Investment Fund (MIF) application to the DEED on behalf of MoneyGram. On February 17th, DEED formally notified the City that MoneyGram had been awarded $302,325 in Minnesota Investment Funds which will be structured as a forgivable loan. In preparing the necessary MIF loan documents, DEED has requested that the City Council adopt a resolution ratifying the EDA as the applicant on behalf of MoneyGram and administrator of the loan. The action has been reviewed by the EDA’s legal counsel who supports adoption of the proposed resolution. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The EDA will serve as the financial conduit through which DEED’s MIF loan funds will pass through to MoneyGram. Upon verification of MoneyGram’s machinery and equipment purchases required under the MIF program, DEED will disburse MIF loan funds to the EDA which, in turn, will forward them to MoneyGram. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution Prepared by: Greg Hunt, Economic Development Coordinator Reviewed by: Michele Schnitker, Housing Supervisor/Deputy CD Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, EDA Executive Director and City Manager City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4c) Page 2 Title: Ratification of the EDA’s MIF Application to DEED on behalf of MoneyGram CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 16-____ RESOLUTION RATIFYING A MINNESOTA INVESTMENT FUND APPLICATION BY THE ST. LOUIS PARK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN CONNECTION WITH MONEYGRAM PAYMENT SYSTEMS, INC. WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota (the “City”), desires to assist MoneyGram Payment Systems, Inc. (“MoneyGram”), which is proposing the expansion of its business, including the creation of at least 52 new jobs and the retention of 408 jobs, in the City; and, WHEREAS, the City understands that MoneyGram, through and with the support of the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority (“Authority”), wishes to apply or has applied to the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development’s Minnesota Investment Fund Program for project financing; and, WHEREAS, on the date hereof, the City held a City Council meeting to consider this matter. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, after due consideration, the Mayor and City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, hereby express their approval of the Minnesota Investment Fund application or award from the Authority to assist with this project, and ratify the Authority’s actions in applying for such assistance. Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council April 4, 2016 __________________________________ ____________________________________ Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: __________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 4, 2016 Consent Agenda Item: 4d EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Accept Donation from Minnesota Society of Arboriculture RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution approving acceptance of a monetary donation from the Minnesota Society of Arboriculture in an amount not to exceed $2,500 for all related expenses for Jim Vaughan, Natural Resources Coordinator, to attend the 2016 International Society of Arboriculture Conference in Fort Worth, Texas. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish to accept the gift with restrictions on its use? SUMMARY: State statute requires City Council’s acceptance of donations. This requirement is necessary in order to make sure the City Council has knowledge of any restrictions placed on the use of each donation prior to it being expended. The City of St. Louis Park’s Natural Resources Coordinator, Jim Vaughan, will represent the Minnesota Society of Arboriculture (MSA) as their International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) Council Representative at the 2016 Arboriculture Conference in Fort Worth, Texas, August 13 - 17, 2016. This conference is an annual international conference for arborists covering many aspects in the science, technology, management and practice of community tree care. The Minnesota Society of Arboriculture elected Mr. Vaughan as their representative to the ISA. The ISA requires chapter representatives (i.e. Mr. Vaughan) attend each annual ISA conference. As a result of Mr. Vaughan’s election/appointment, the Minnesota Society of Arboriculture has offered to pay all related conference expenses in an amount not to exceed $2,500. The City Attorney has reviewed this matter. His opinion is that state law permits the payment of such expenses by this organization, regardless of whether the funds come from primary or secondary sources. It is treated as a gift to the city and there needs to be a resolution adopted by the City Council determining that attendance at this event serves a public purpose and accepting the gift. The resolution needs to be adopted before attendance at the conference. The City of St. Louis Park will pay for travel, the conference and hotel accommodations up front and submit receipts to MSA for reimbursement. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: This donation will be used toward the expenses incurred by Jim Vaughan’s attendance to the International Society of Arboriculture conference in Fort Worth, Texas. VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a leader in environmental stewardship. We will increase environmental consciousness and responsibility in all areas of city business. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution Prepared by: Jim Vaughan, Natural Resources Coordinator Reviewed by: Cindy Walsh, Director of Operations & Recreation Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4d) Page 2 Title: Accept Donation from Minnesota Society of Arboriculture RESOLUTION NO. 16-__ RESOLUTION ACCEPTING DONATION FROM MINNESOTA SOCIETY OF ARBORICULTURE FOR EXPENSES FOR JIM VAUGHAN TO ATTEND THE 2016 INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ARBORICULTURE CONFERENCE WHEREAS, The City of St. Louis Park is required by State statute to authorize acceptance of any donations; and WHEREAS, the City Council must also ratify any restrictions placed on the donation by the donor; and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Society of Arboriculture will compensate all related costs, in an amount not to exceed $2,500, for the City’s Natural Resources Coordinator, Jim Vaughan, to attend the International Society of Arboriculture Conference, August 13 - 17, 2016, in Fort Worth, Texas; and NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park that the gift is hereby accepted with thanks to the Minnesota Society of Arboriculture with the understanding that it must be used for expenses incurred by Jim Vaughan to attend the 2016 International Society of Arboriculture Conference held in Fort Worth, Texas. Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council April 4, 2016 City Manager Mayor Attest: City Clerk Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 4, 2016 Consent Agenda Item: 4e EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Accept Monetary Donation from Rotary Club of St. Louis Park for the Summer Concert Series ($1,300) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution approving acceptance of a monetary donation from the Rotary Club of St. Louis Park in the amount of $1,300 for the Recreation Division’s Summer Concert Series. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish to accept the gift with restrictions on its use? SUMMARY: State statute requires City Council’s acceptance of donations. This requirement is necessary in order to make sure the City Council has knowledge of any restrictions placed on the use of each donation prior to it being expended. The Rotary Club of St. Louis Park is graciously donating an amount of $1,300. The donation is given with the restriction that it be used toward the Summer Concert Series. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: This donation will be used to support the Recreation Division’s Summer Concert Series. The Series is budgeted in the Organized Recreation budget. VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged community. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution Prepared by: Stacy M. Voelker, Senior Office Assistant Reviewed by: Cindy Walsh, Director of Operations & Recreation Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4e) Page 2 Title: Accept Monetary Donation from Rotary Club of St. Louis Park for the Summer Concert Series ($1,300) RESOLUTION NO. 16-____ RESOLUTION APPROVING ACCEPTANCE OF DONATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,300 TO BE USED FOR THE SUMMER CONCERT SERIES WHEREAS, The City of St. Louis Park is required by State statute to authorize acceptance of any donations; and WHEREAS, the City Council must also ratify any restrictions placed on the donation by the donor; and WHEREAS, the Rotary Club of St. Louis Park donated $1,300 to assist in the funding of the Recreation Division’s Summer Concert Series; and NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park that the gift is hereby accepted with thanks to the Rotary Club of St. Louis Park with the understanding that it must be used to assist in funding the Recreation Division’s Summer Concert Series. Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council April 4, 2016 City Manager Mayor Attest: City Clerk Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 4, 2016 Consent Agenda Item: 4f EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Resolution Approving Master Partnership Contract with MnDOT RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution approving a Master Partnership Contract with MnDOT relating to Laboratory Testing Services. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish to continue to partner with MnDOT for Laboratory Testing services? SUMMARY: The City uses the MnDOT Office of Materials and Road Research to perform laboratory testing of materials for our construction and maintenance projects. The MnDOT materials lab performs routine materials testing at a good price. Their staff provides timely specialized expertise, testing, leadership, guidance and direction in geotechnical, materials, and pavement to improve performance and cost effectiveness. They also provide tools to practice the most efficient pavement designs, maintenance and construction procedures. This Master Partnership Contract is required in order for the City to continue to receive these services with MnDOT. These testing services are needed to meet the requirements of our material specifications. Many of these request are handled by Work Order. The resolution and agreement authorizes the City Engineer/ City Manager to approve Work Orders. The maximum cost a Work Order can be written for is $50,000. This is consistent with our City contracting policy. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: These testing services are needed to meet the requirements of our material specifications. These costs are included in our Project engineering estimates and are paid for using Pavement Management or Municipal State Aid funds depending on the project. Total costs for testing depends on the project; however, the range is between $5- $10,000 per project. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution MnDOT Agreement #1001924 Prepared by: Debra Heiser, Engineering Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Page 2 Title: Resolution Approving Master Partnership Contract with MnDOT RESOLUTION NO. 16-____ RESOLUTION APPROVING MASTER PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation wishes to cooperate closely with local units of government to coordinate the delivery of transportation services and maximize the efficient delivery of such services at all levels of government; and; WHEREAS, MnDOT and local governments are authorized by Minnesota Statutes sections 471.59, 174.02, and 161.20, to undertake collaborative efforts for the design, construction, maintenance and operation of state and local roads; and; WHEREAS, the parties wish to able to respond quickly and efficiently to such opportunities for collaboration, and have determined that having the ability to write “work orders” against a master contract would provide the greatest speed and flexibility in responding to identified needs. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of St. Louis Park, Minnesota as follows: 1. That the City of St. Louis Park enter into a Master Partnership Contract with the Minnesota Department of Transportation, a copy of which was before the Council. 2. The Mayor and City Manager are authorized and directed to execute the attached Contract, and any amendments thereto. 3. In accordance with the provisions of the Agreement, the Council hereby designates Debra Heiser, as director to the SRA Board and Jack Sullivan as the alternate director to the Board. 4. That the City Engineer / City Manager is authorized to negotiate work order contracts pursuant to the Master Contract, which work order contracts may provide for payment to or from MnDOT, and that the City Engineer / City Manager may execute such work order contracts on behalf of the City of St. Louis Park without further approval by this Council. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council April 4, 2016 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk MnDOT Agreement # 1001924 STATE OF MINNESOTA AND CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK MASTER PARTNERSHIP CONTRACT This master contract is between the State of Minnesota, acting through its Commissioner of Transportation hereinafter referred to as the “State” and the City of St. Louis Park, acting through its City Council, hereinafter referred to as the “Local Government." Recitals 1. The parties are authorized to enter into this agreement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes. §§15.061, 471.59 and 174.02. 2. Minn. Stat. § 161.20, subd. 2, authorizes the Commissioner of Transportation to make arrangements with and cooperate with any governmental authority for the purposes of constructing, maintaining and improving the trunk highway system. 3. Each party to this Contract is a “road authority” as defined by Minn. Stat. §160.02, subd. 25. 4. Minn. Stat. § 161.39, subd. 1, authorizes a road authority to perform work for another road authority. Such work may include providing technical and engineering advice, assistance and supervision, surveying, preparing plans for the construction or reconstruction of roadways, and performing roadway maintenance. 5. Minn. Stat. §174.02, subd. 6, authorizes the Commissioner of Transportation to enter into agreements with other governmental entities for research and experimentation; for sharing facilities, equipment, staff, data, or other means of providing transportation-related services; or for other cooperative programs that promote efficiencies in providing governmental services, or that further development of innovation in transportation for the benefit of the citizens of Minnesota. 6. Each party wishes to occasionally procure services from the other party, which the parties agree will enhance the efficiency of delivering governmental services at all levels. This Master Partnership Contract provides a framework for the efficient handling of such requests. This Master Partnership Contract contains terms generally governing the relationship between the parties hereto. When specific services are requested, the parties will (unless otherwise specified herein) enter into a “Work Order” contracts. 7. Subsequent to the execution of this Master Partnership Contract, the parties may (but are not required to) enter into “Work Order” contracts. These Work Orders will specify the work to be done, timelines for completion, and compensation to be paid for the specific work. 8. The parties are entering into this Master Partnership Contract to establish terms that will govern all of the Work Orders subsequently issued under the authority of this Contract. Master Contract 1. Term of Master Contract; Use of Work Order Contracts; Survival of Terms 1.1. Effective Date: This contract will be effective on the date last signed by the Local Government, and all State officials as required under Minn. Stat. § 16C.05, subd. 2. 1.2. A party must not accept work under this Contract until it is fully executed. 1.3. Expiration Date. This Contract will expire on June 30, 2017. Page 1 of 14 CM Master Partnership Contract (CM Rev. 10/05/2015) City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Resolution Approving Master Partnership Contract with MnDOT Page 3 MnDOT Agreement # 1001924 1.4. Work Order Contracts. A work order contract must be negotiated and executed (by both the State and the Local Government) for each particular engagement, except for Technical Services provided by the State to the Local Government as specified in Article 2. The work order contract must specify the detailed scope of work and deliverables for that engagement. A party must not begin work under a work order until such work order is fully executed. The terms of this Master Partnership Contract will apply to all work orders issued hereunder, unless specifically varied in the work order. The Local Government understands that this Master Contract is not a guarantee of any payments or work order assignments, and that payments will only be issued for work actually performed under fully-executed work orders. 1.5. Survival of Terms. The following clauses survive the expiration or cancellation of this master contract and all work order contracts: 12. Liability; 13. State Audits; 14. Government Data Practices and Intellectual Property; 17. Publicity; 18. Governing Law, Jurisdiction, and Venue; and 22. Data Disclosure. All terms of this Master Contract will survive with respect to any Work Order issued prior to the expiration date of the Master Contract. 1.6. Sample Work Order. A sample work order contract is available upon request from the State. 2. Technical Services 2.1. Technical Services include repetitive low-cost services routinely performed by the State for the Local Government. These services may be performed by the State for the Local Government without the execution of a work order, as these services are provided in accordance with standardized practices and processes and do not require a detailed scope of work. Technical services are limited to the following services: 2.1.1. Pavement Striping, Sign and Signal Repair, Bridge Load Ratings, Bridge and Structure Inspections, Minor Bridge Maintenance, Minor Road Maintenance (such as guard rail repair and sign knockdown repair), Pavement Condition Data, Materials Testing and Carcass Removal. 2.1.2. Every other service not falling under the services listed in 2.1.1 will require a Work Order contract. 2.2. The Local Government may request the State to perform Technical Services in an informal manner, such as by the use of email, a purchase order, or by delivering materials to a State lab and requesting testing. A request may be made via telephone, but will not be considered accepted unless acknowledged in writing by the State. 2.3. The State will promptly inform the Local Government if the State will be unable to perform the requested Technical Services. Otherwise, the State will perform the Technical Services in accordance with the State’s normal processes and practices, including scheduling practices taking into account the availability of State staff and equipment. 2.4. Payment Basis. Unless otherwise agreed to by the parties prior to performance of the services, the State will charge the Local Government the State’s then-current rate for performing the Technical Services. The then-current rate may include the State’s normal and customary labor additives. The State will invoice the Local Government upon completion of the services, or at regular intervals not more than once monthly as agreed upon by the parties. The invoice will provide a summary of the Technical Services provided by the State during the invoice period. 3. Services Requiring A Work Order Contract 3.1. Work Order Contracts: A party may request the other party to perform any of the following services under individual work order contracts. Page 2 of 14 CM Master Partnership Contract (CM Rev. 10/05/2015) City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Resolution Approving Master Partnership Contract with MnDOT Page 4 MnDOT Agreement # 1001924 3.2. Professional and Technical Services. A party may provide professional and technical services upon the request of the other party. As defined by Minn. Stat. §16C.08, subd. 1, professional/technical services “means services that are intellectual in character, including consultation, analysis, evaluation, prediction, planning, programming, or recommendation; and result in the production of a report or completion of a task.” Professional and technical services do not include providing supplies or materials except as incidental to performing such services. Professional and technical services include (by way of example and without limitation) engineering services, surveying, foundation recommendations and reports, environmental documentation, right-of-way assistance (such as performing appraisals or providing relocation assistance, but excluding the exercise of the power of eminent domain), geometric layouts, final construction plans, graphic presentations, public relations, and facilitating open houses. A party will normally provide such services with its own personnel; however, a party’s professional/technical services may also include hiring and managing outside consultants to perform work provided that a party itself provides active project management for the use of such outside consultants. 3.3. Roadway Maintenance. A party may provide roadway maintenance upon the request of the other party. Roadway maintenance does not include roadway reconstruction. This work may include but is not limited to snow removal, ditch spraying, roadside mowing, bituminous mill and overlay (only small projects), seal coat, bridge hits, major retaining wall failures, major drainage failures, and message painting. All services must be performed by an employee with sufficient skills, training, expertise or certification to perform such work, and work must be supervised by a qualified employee of the party performing the work. 3.4. Construction Administration. A party may administer roadway construction projects upon the request of the other party. Roadway construction includes (by way of example and without limitation) the construction, reconstruction, or rehabilitation of mainline, shoulder, median, pedestrian or bicycle pathway, lighting and signal systems, pavement mill and overlays, seal coating, guardrail installation, and channelization. These services may be performed by the Providing Party’s own forces, or the Providing Party may administer outside contracts for such work. Construction administration may include letting and awarding construction contracts for such work (including state projects to be completed in conjunction with local projects). All contract administration services must be performed by an employee with sufficient skills, training, expertise or certification to perform such work. 3.5. Emergency Services. A party may provide aid upon request of the other party in the event of a man -made disaster, natural disaster or other act of God. Emergency services includes all those services as the parties mutually agree are necessary to plan for, prepare for, deal with, and recover from emergency situations. These services include, without limitation, planning, engineering, construction, maintenance, and removal and disposal services related to things such as road closures, traffic control, debris removal, flood protection and mitigation, sign repair, sandbag activities and general cleanup. Work will be performed by an employee with sufficient skills, training, expertise or certification to perform such work, and work must be supervised by a qualified employee of the party performing the work. If it is not feasible to have an executed work order prior to performance of the work, the parties will promptly confer to determine whether work may be commenced without a fully-executed work order in place. If work commences without a fully-executed work order, the parties will follow up with execution of a work order as soon as feasible. 3.6. When a need is identified, the State and the Local Government will discuss the proposed work and the resources needed to perform the work. If a party desires to perform such work, the parties will negotiate the specific and detailed work tasks and cost. The State will then prepare a work order contract. Generally, a work order contract will be limited to one specific Page 3 of 14 CM Master Partnership Contract (CM Rev. 10/05/2015) City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Resolution Approving Master Partnership Contract with MnDOT Page 5 MnDOT Agreement # 1001924 project/engagement, although “on call” work orders may be prepared for certain types of services, especially for “Technical Services” items as identified section 2.1.2. The work order will also identify specific deliverables required, and timeframes for completing work. A work order must be fully executed by the parties prior to work being commenced. The Local Government will not be paid for work performed prior to execution of a work order and authorization by the State. 4. Responsibilities of the Providing Party The party requesting the work will be referred to as the “Requesting Party” and the party performing the work will be referred to as the “Providing Party.” Each work order will set forth particular requirements for that project/engagement. 4.1. Terms Applicable to ALL Work Orders. The terms in this section 4.1 will apply to ALL work orders. 4.1.1. Each work order will identify an Authorized Representative for each party. Each party’s authorized representative is responsible for administering the work order, and has the authority to make any decisions regarding the work, and to give and receive any notices required or permitted under this Master Contract or the work order. 4.1.2. The Providing Party will furnish and assign a publicly employed licensed engineer (Project Engineer), to be in responsible charge of the project(s) and to supervise and direct the work to be performed under each work order. For services not requiring an engineer, the Providing Party will furnish and assign another responsible employee to be in charge of the project. The services of the Providing Party under a work order may not be otherwise assigned, sublet, or transferred unless approved in writing by the Requesting Party’s authorized representative. This written consent will in no way relieve the Providing Party from its primary responsibility for the work. 4.1.3. If the Local Government is the Providing Party, the Project Engineer may request in writing specific engineering and/or technical services from the State, pursuant to Minn. Stat. Section 161.39. The work order may require the Local Government to deposit payment in advance or may, at the State’s option, permit payment in arrears. If the State furnishes the services requested, the Local Government will promptly pay the State to reimburse the state trunk highway fund for the full cost and expense of furnishing such services. The costs and expenses will include the current State labor additives and overhead rates, subject to adjustment based on actual direct costs that have been verified by audit. 4.1.4. Only the receipt of a fully executed work order contract authorizes the Providing Party to begin work on a project. Any and all effort, expenses, or actions taken by the Providing Party before the work order contract is fully executed is considered unauthorized and undertaken at the risk of non-payment. 4.1.5. In connection with the performance of this contract and any work orders issued hereunder, the Providing Agency will comply with all applicable Federal and State laws and regulations. When the Providing Party is authorized or permitted to award contracts in connection with any work order, the Providing Party will require and cause its contractors and subcontractors to comply with all Federal and State laws and regulations. 4.2. Additional Terms for Roadway Maintenance. The terms of section 4.1 and this section 4.2 will apply to all work orders for Roadway Maintenance. 4.2.1. Unless otherwise provided for by agreement or work order, the Providing Party must obtain all permits and sanctions that may be required for the proper and lawful performance of the work. Page 4 of 14 CM Master Partnership Contract (CM Rev. 10/05/2015) City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Resolution Approving Master Partnership Contract with MnDOT Page 6 MnDOT Agreement # 1001924 4.2.2. The Providing Party must perform maintenance in accordance with MnDOT maintenance manuals, policies and operations. 4.2.3. The Providing Party must use State-approved materials, including (by way of example and without limitation), sign posts, sign sheeting, and de-icing and anti-icing chemicals. 4.3. Additional Terms for Construction Administration. The terms of section 4.1 and this section 4.3 will apply to all work orders for construction administration. 4.3.1. Contract(s) must be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder or best value proposer in accordance with state law. 4.3.2. Contractor(s) must be required to post payment and performance bonds in an amount equal to the contract amount. The Providing Party will take all necessary action to make claims against such bonds in the event of any default by the contractor. 4.3.3. Contractor(s) must be required to perform work in accordance with the latest edition of the Minnesota Department of Transportation Standard Specifications for Construction. 4.3.4. For work performed on State right-of-way, contractor(s) must be required to indemnify and hold the State harmless against any loss incurred with respect to the performance of the contracted work, and must be required to provide evidence of insurance coverage commensurate with project risk. 4.3.5. Contractor(s) must pay prevailing wages pursuant to applicable state and federal law. 4.3.6. Contractor(s) must comply with all applicable Federal, and State laws, ordinances and regulations, including but not limited to applicable human rights/anti-discrimination laws and laws concerning the participation of Disadvantaged Business Enterprises in federally- assisted contracts 4.3.7. Unless otherwise agreed in a Work Order, each party will be responsible for providing rights of way, easement, and construction permits for its portion of the improvements. Each party will, upon the other’s request, furnish copies of right of way certificates, easements, and construction permits. 4.3.8. The Providing Party may approve minor changes to the Requesting Party’s portion of the project work if such changes do not increase the Requesting Party’s cost obligation under the applicable work order. 4.3.9. The Providing Party will not approve any contractor claims for additional compensation without the Requesting Party’s written approval, and the execution of a proper amendment to the applicable work order when necessary. The Local Government will tender the processing and defense of any such claims to the State upon the State’s request. 4.3.10. The Local Government must coordinate all trunk highway work affecting any utilities with the State’s Utilities Office. 4.3.11. The Providing Party must coordinate all necessary detours with the Requesting Party. 4.3.12. If the Local Government is the Providing Party, and there is work performed on the trunk highway right-of-way, the following will apply: 4.3.12.1 The Local Government will have a permit to perform the work on the trunk highway. The State may revoke this permit if the work is not being performed in a safe, proper and skillful manner, or if the contractor is violating the terms of any law, regulation, or permit applicable to the work. The State will have no Page 5 of 14 CM Master Partnership Contract (CM Rev. 10/05/2015) City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Resolution Approving Master Partnership Contract with MnDOT Page 7 MnDOT Agreement # 1001924 liability to the Local Government, or its contractor, if work is suspended or stopped due to any such condition or concern. 4.3.12.2 The Local Government will require its contractor to conduct all traffic control in accordance with the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. 4.3.12.3 The Local Government will require its contractor to comply with the terms of all permits issued for the project including, but not limited to, NPDES and other environmental permits. 4.3.12.4 All improvements constructed on the State’s right-of-way will become the property of the State. 5. Responsibilities of the Requesting Party 5.1. After authorizing the Providing Party to begin work, the Requesting Party will furnish any data or material in its possession relating to the project that may be of use to the Providing Party in performing the work. 5.2. All such data furnished to the Providing Party will remain the property of the Requesting Party and will be promptly returned upon the Requesting Party’s request or upon the expiration or termination of this contract (subject to data retention requirements of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act and other applicable law). 5.3. The Providing Party will analyze all such data furnished by the Requesting Party. If the Providing Party finds any such data to be incorrect or incomplete, the Providing Party will bring the facts to the attention of the Requesting Party before proceeding with the part of the project affected. The Providing Party will investigate the matter, and if it finds that such data is incorrect or incomplete, it will promptly determine a method for furnishing corrected data. Delay in furnishing data will not be considered justification for an adjustment in compensation. 5.4. The State will provide to the Local Government copies of any Trunk Highway fund clauses to be included in the bid solicitation and will provide any required Trunk Highway fund provisions to be included in the Proposal for Highway Construction, that are different from those required for State Aid construction. 5.5. The Requesting Party will perform final reviews and/or inspections of its portion of the project work. If the work is found to have been completed in accordance with the work order contract, the Requesting Party will promptly release any remaining funds due the Providing Party for the Project(s). 5.6. The work order contracts may include additional responsibilities to be completed by the Requesting Party. 6. Time In the performance of project work under a work order contract, time is of the essence. 7. Consideration and Payment 7.1. Consideration. The Requesting Party will pay the Providing Party as specified in the work order. The State’s normal and customary labor additives will apply to work performed by the State, unless otherwise specified in the work order. The State’s normal and customary labor additives will not apply if the parties agree to a “lump sum” or “unit rate” payment. 7.2. State’s Maximum Obligation. The total compensation to be paid by the State to the Local Government under all work order contracts issued pursuant to this Master Contract will not exceed $50,000.00. Page 6 of 14 CM Master Partnership Contract (CM Rev. 10/05/2015) City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Resolution Approving Master Partnership Contract with MnDOT Page 8 MnDOT Agreement # 1001924 7.3. Travel Expenses. It is anticipated that all travel expenses will be included in the base cost of the Providing Party’s services, and unless otherwise specifically set forth in an applicable work order, the Providing Party will not be separately reimbursed for travel and subsistence expenses incurred by the Providing Party in performing any work order contract. In those cases where the State agrees to reimburse travel expenses, such expenses will be reimbursed in the same manner and in no greater amount than provided in the current "MnDOT Travel Regulations” a copy of which is on file with and available from the MnDOT District Office. The Local Government will not be reimbursed for travel and subsistence expenses incurred outside of Minnesota unless it has received the State’s prior written approval for such travel. 7.4. Payment. 7.4.1. Generally. The Requesting Party will pay the Providing Party as specified in the applicable work order, and will make prompt payment in accordance with Minnesota law. 7.4.2. Payment by the Local Government. 7.4.2.1. The Local Government will make payment to the order of the Commissioner of Transportation. 7.4.2.2. IMPORTANT NOTE: PAYMENT MUST REFERENCE THE “MNDOT CONTRACT NUMBER” SHOWN ON THE FACE PAGE OF THIS CONTRACT AND THE “INVOICE NUMBER” ON THE INVOICE RECEIVED FROM MNDOT. 7.4.2.3. Remit payment to the address below: MnDOT Attn: Cash Accounting RE: MnDOT Contract Number 1001924 and Invoice Number ###### Mail Stop 215 395 John Ireland Blvd St. Paul, MN 55155 7.4.3. Payment by the State. 7.4.3.1. Generally. The State will promptly pay the Local Government after the Local Government presents an itemized invoice for the services actually performed and the State's Authorized Representative accepts the invoiced services. Invoices must be submitted as specified in the applicable work order, but no more frequently than monthly. 7.4.3.2. Retainage for Professional and Technical Services. For work orders for professional and technical services, as required by Minn. Stat. § 16C.08, subd. 2(10), no more than 90 percent of the amount due under any work order contract may be paid until the final product of the work order contract has been reviewed by the State’s authorized representative. The balance due will be paid when the State’s authorized representative determines that the Local Government has satisfactorily fulfilled all the terms of the work order contract. 8. Conditions of Payment All work performed by the Providing Party under a work order contract must be performed to the Requesting Party’s satisfaction, as determined at the sole and reasonable discretion of the Requesting Party’s Authorized Representative and in accordance with all applicable federal and state laws, rules, and regulations. The Providing Party will not receive payment for work found by the State to be unsatisfactory or performed in violation of federal or state law. Page 7 of 14 CM Master Partnership Contract (CM Rev. 10/05/2015) City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Resolution Approving Master Partnership Contract with MnDOT Page 9 MnDOT Agreement # 1001924 9. Local Government’s Authorized Representative and Project Manager; Authority to Execute Work Order Contracts 9.1. The Local Government’s Authorized Representative for administering this master contract is the Local Government’s Engineer, and the Engineer has the responsibility to monitor the Local Government’s performance. The Local Government’s Authorized Representative is also authorized to execute work order contracts on behalf of the Local Government without approval of each proposed work order contract by its governing body. 9.2. The Local Government’s Project Manager will be identified in each work order contract. 10. State’s Authorized Representative and Project Manager 10.1. The State's Authorized Representative for this master contract is the District State Aid Engineer, who has the responsibility to monitor the State’s performance. 10.2. The State’s Project Manager will be identified in each work order contract. 11. Assignment, Amendments, Waiver, and Contract Complete 11.1. Assignment. Neither party may assign or transfer any rights or obligations under this Master Contract or any work order contract without the prior consent of the other and a fully executed Assignment Agreement, executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved this Master Contract, or their successors in office. 11.2. Amendments. Any amendment to this master contract or any work order contract must be in writing and will not be effective until it has been executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved the original contract, or their successors in office. 11.3. Waiver. If a party fails to enforce any provision of this master contract or any work order contract, that failure does not waive the provision or the party’s right to subsequently enforce it. 11.4. Contract Complete. This master contract and any work order contract contain all negotiations and agreements between the State and the Local Government. No other understanding regarding this master contract or any work order contract issued hereunder, whether written or oral may be used to bind either party. 12. Liability. Each party will be responsible for its own acts and omissions to the extent provided by law. The Local Government’s liability is governed by Minn. Stat. chapter 466 and other applicable law. The State’s liability is governed by Minn. Stat. section 3.736 and other applicable law. This clause will not be construed to bar any legal remedies a party may have for the other party’s failure to fulfill its obligations under this master contract or any work order contract. Neither party agrees to assume any environmental liability on behalf of the other party. A Providing Party under any work order is acting only as a “Contractor” to the Requesting Party, as the term “Contractor” is defined in Minn. Stat. §115B.03 (subd. 10), and is entitled to the protections afforded to a “Contractor” by the Minnesota Environmental Response and Liability Act. The parties specifically intend that Minn. Stat. §471.59 subd. 1a will apply to any work undertaken under this Master Contract and any work order issued hereunder. 13. State Audits Under Minn. Stat. § 16C.05, subd. 5, the party’s books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices relevant to any work order contract are subject to examination by the parties and by the State Auditor or Legislative Auditor, as appropriate, for a minimum of six years from the end of this Master Contract. 14. Government Data Practices and Intellectual Property Page 8 of 14 CM Master Partnership Contract (CM Rev. 10/05/2015) City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Resolution Approving Master Partnership Contract with MnDOT Page 10 MnDOT Agreement # 1001924 14.1. Government Data Practices. The Local Government and State must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 13, as it applies to all data provided by the State under this Master Contract and any work order contract, and as it applies to all data created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by the Local Government under this Master Contract and any work order contract. The civil remedies of Minn. Stat. § 13.08 apply to the release of the data referred to in this clause by either the Local Government or the State. 14.2. Intellectual Property Rights 14.2.1. Intellectual Property Rights. The Requesting Party will own all rights, title, and interest in all of the intellectual property rights, including copyrights, patents, trade secrets, trademarks, and service marks in the Works and Documents created and paid for under work order contracts. Works means all inventions, improvements, discoveries (whether or not patentable), databases, computer programs, reports, notes, studies, photographs, negatives, designs, drawings, specifications, materials, tapes, and disks conceived, reduced to practice, created or originated by the Providing Party, its employees, agents, and subcontractors, either individually or jointly with others in the performance of this master contract or any work order contract. Works includes “Documents.” Documents are the originals of any databases, computer programs, reports, notes, studies, photographs, negatives, designs, drawings, specifications, materials, tapes, disks, or other materials, whether in tangible or electronic forms, prepared by the Providing Party, its employees, agents, or contractors, in the performance of a work order contract. The Documents will be the exclusive property of the Requesting Party and all such Documents must be immediately returned to the Requesting Party by the Providing Party upon completion or cancellation of the work order contract. To the extent possible, those Works eligible for copyright protection under the United States Copyright Act will be deemed to be “works made for hire.” The Providing Party Government assigns all right, title, and interest it may have in the Works and the Documents to the Requesting Party. The Providing Party must, at the request of the Requesting Party, execute all papers and perform all other acts necessary to transfer or record the Requesting Party’s ownership interest in the Works and Documents. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Requesting Party grants the Providing Party an irrevocable and royalty-free license to use such intellectual property for its own non-commercial purposes, including dissemination to political subd.s of the state of Minnesota and to transportation-related agencies such as the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. 14.2.2. Obligations with Respect to Intellectual Property. 14.2.2.1. Notification. Whenever any invention, improvement, or discovery (whether or not patentable) is made or conceived for the first time or actually or constructively reduced to practice by the Providing Party, including its employees and subcontractors, in the performance of the work order contract, the Providing Party will immediately give the Requesting Party’s Authorized Representative written notice thereof, and must promptly furnish the Authorized Representative with complete information and/or disclosure thereon. 14.2.2.2. Representation. The Providing Party must perform all acts, and take all steps necessary to ensure that all intellectual property rights in the Works and Documents are the sole property of the Requesting Party, and that neither Providing Party nor its employees, agents or contractors retain any interest in and to the Works and Documents. 15. Affirmative Action Page 9 of 14 CM Master Partnership Contract (CM Rev. 10/05/2015) City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Resolution Approving Master Partnership Contract with MnDOT Page 11 MnDOT Agreement # 1001924 The State intends to carry out its responsibility for requiring affirmative action by its Contractors, pursuant to Minn. Stat. §363A.36. Pursuant to that Statute, the Local Government is encouraged to prepare and implement an affirmative action plan for the employment of minority persons, women, and the qualified disabled, and submit such plan to the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human Rights. In addition, when the Local Government lets a contract for the performance of work under a work order issued pursuant to this Master Contract, it must include the following in the bid or proposal solicitation and any contracts awarded as a result thereof: 15.1. Covered Contracts and Contractors. If the Contract exceeds $100,000 and the Contractor employed more than 40 full-time employees on a single working day during the previous 12 months in Minnesota or in the state where it has its principle place of business, then the Contractor must comply with the requirements of Minn. Stat. § 363A.36 and Minn. R. Parts 5000.3400-5000.3600. A Contractor covered by Minn. Stat. § 363A.36 because it employed more than 40 full-time employees in another state and does not have a certificate of compliance, must certify that it is in compliance with federal affirmative action requirements. 15.2. Minn. Stat. § 363A.36. Minn. Stat. § 363A.36 requires the Contractor to have an affirmative action plan for the employment of minority persons, women, and qualified disabled individuals approved by the Minnesota Commissioner of Human Rights (“Commissioner”) as indicated by a certificate of compliance. The law addresses suspension or revocation of a certificate of compliance and contract consequences in that event. A contract awarded without a certificate of compliance may be voided. 15.3. Minn. R. Parts 5000.3400-5000.3600. 15.3.1. General. Minn. R. Parts 5000.3400-5000.3600 implement Minn. Stat. § 363A.36. These rules include, but are not limited to, criteria for contents, approval, and implementation of affirmative action plans; procedures for issuing certificates of compliance and criteria for determining a contractor’s compliance status; procedures for addressing deficiencies, sanctions, and notice and hearing; annual compliance reports; procedures for compliance review; and contract consequences for non-compliance. The specific criteria for approval or rejection of an affirmative action plan are contained in various provisions of Minn. R. Parts 5000.3400-5000.3600 including, but not limited to, parts 5000.3420-5000.3500 and 5000.3552-5000.3559. 15.3.2. Disabled Workers. The Contractor must comply with the following affirmative action requirements for disabled workers: 15.3.2.1. The Contractor must not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of physical or mental disability in regard to any position for which the employee or applicant for employment is qualified. The Contractor agrees to take affirmative action to employ, advance in employment, and otherwise treat qualified disabled persons without discrimination based upon their physical or mental disability in all employment practices such as the following: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruitment, advertising, layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation, and selection for training, including apprenticeship. 15.3.2.2. The Contractor agrees to comply with the rules and relevant orders of the Minnesota Department of Human Rights issued pursuant to the Minnesota Human Rights Act. 15.3.2.3. In the event of the Contractor's noncompliance with the requirements of this clause, actions for noncompliance may be taken in accordance with Minn. Stat. Section 363A.36, and the rules and relevant orders of the Minnesota Page 10 of 14 CM Master Partnership Contract (CM Rev. 10/05/2015) City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Resolution Approving Master Partnership Contract with MnDOT Page 12 MnDOT Agreement # 1001924 Department of Human Rights issued pursuant to the Minnesota Human Rights Act. 15.3.2.4. The Contractor agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices in a form to be prescribed by the commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human Rights. Such notices must state the Contractor's obligation under the law to take affirmative action to employ and advance in employment qualified disabled employees and applicants for employment, and the rights of applicants and employees. 15.3.2.5. The Contractor must notify each labor union or representative of workers with which it has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract understanding, that the Contractor is bound by the terms of Minn. Stat. Section 363A.36, of the Minnesota Human Rights Act and is committed to take affirmative action to employ and advance in employment physically and mentally disabled persons. 15.3.3. Consequences. The consequences for the Contractor’s failure to implement its affirmative action plan or make a good faith effort to do so include, but are not limited to, suspension or revocation of a certificate of compliance by the Commissioner, refusal by the Commissioner to approve subsequent plans, and termination of all or part of this contract by the Commissioner or the State. 15.3.4. Certification. The Contractor hereby certifies that it is in compliance with the requirements of Minn. Stat. § 363A.36 and Minn. R. Parts 5000.3400-5000.3600 and is aware of the consequences for noncompliance. 16. Workers’ Compensation Each party will be responsible for its own employees for any workers compensation claims. This Master Contract, and any work orders issued hereunder, are not intended to constitute an interchange of government employees under Minn. Stat. §15.53. To the extent that this Master Contract, or any work order issued hereunder, is determined to be subject to Minn. Stat. §15.53, such statute will control to the extent of any conflict between the Contract and the statute. 17. Publicity 17.1. Publicity. Any publicity regarding the subject matter of a work order contract where the State is the Requesting Party must identify the State as the sponsoring agency and must not be released without prior written approval from the State’s Authorized Representative. For purposes of this provision, publicity includes notices, informational pamphlets, press releases, research, reports, signs, and similar public notices prepared by or for the Local Government individually or jointly with others, or any subcontractors, with respect to the program, publications, or services provided resulting from a work order contract. 17.2. Data Practices Act. Section 17.1 is not intended to override the Local Government’s responsibilities under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act. 18. Governing Law, Jurisdiction, and Venue Minnesota law, without regard to its choice-of-law provisions, governs this master contract and all work order contracts. Venue for all legal proceedings out of this master contract or any work order contracts, or the breach of any such contracts, must be in the appropriate state or federal court with competent jurisdiction in Ramsey County, Minnesota. 19. Prompt Payment; Payment to Subcontractors Page 11 of 14 CM Master Partnership Contract (CM Rev. 10/05/2015) City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Resolution Approving Master Partnership Contract with MnDOT Page 13 MnDOT Agreement # 1001924 The parties must make prompt payment of their obligations in accordance with applicable law. As required by Minn. Stat. § 16A.1245, when the Local Government lets a contract for work pursuant to any work order, the Local Government must require its contractor to pay all subcontractors, less any retainage, within 10 calendar days of the prime contractor's receipt of payment from the Local Government for undisputed services provided by the subcontractor(s) and must pay interest at the rate of one and one-half percent per month or any part of a month to the subcontractor(s) on any undisputed amount not paid on time to the subcontractor(s). 20. Minn. Stat. § 181.59. The Local Government will comply with the provisions of Minn. Stat. § 181.59 which requires: Every contract for or on behalf of the state of Minnesota, or any county, city, town, township, school, school district, or any other district in the state, for materials, supplies, or construction shall contain provisions by which the Contractor agrees: (1) That, in the hiring of common or skilled labor for the performance of any work under any contract, or any subcontract, no contractor, material supplier, or vendor, shall, by reason of race, creed, or color, discriminate against the person or persons who are citizens of the United States or resident aliens who are qualified and available to perform the work to which the employment relates; (2) That no contractor, material supplier, or vendor, shall, in any manner, discriminate against, or intimidate, or prevent the employment of any person or persons identified in clause (1) of this section, or on being hired, prevent, or conspire to prevent, the person or persons from the performance of work under any contract on account of race, creed, or color; (3) That a violation of this section is a misdemeanor; and (4) That this contract may be canceled or terminated by the state, county, city, town, school board, or any other person authorized to grant the contracts for employment, and all money due, or to become due under the contract, may be forfeited for a second or any subsequent violation of the terms or conditions of this contract. 21. Termination; Suspension 21.1. Termination by the State for Convenience. The State or commissioner of Administration may cancel this Master Contract and any work order contracts at any time, with or without cause, upon 30 days written notice to the Local Government. Upon termination, the Local Government and the State will be entitled to payment, determined on a pro rata basis, for services satisfactorily performed. 21.2. Termination by the Local Government for Convenience. The Local Government may cancel this Master Contract and any work order contracts at any time, with or without cause, upon 30 days written notice to the State. Upon termination, the Local Government and the State will be entitled to payment, determined on a pro rata basis, for services satisfactorily performed. 21.3. Termination for Insufficient Funding. The State may immediately terminate or suspend this Master Contract and any work order contract if it does not obtain funding from the Minnesota legislature or other funding source; or if funding cannot be continued at a level sufficient to allow for the payment of the services covered here. Termination or suspension must be by written or fax notice to the Local Government. The State is not obligated to pay for any services that are provided after notice and effective date of termination or suspension. However, the Local Government will be entitled to payment, determined on a pro rata basis, for services satisfactorily performed to the extent that funds are available. The State will not be assessed any penalty if the master contract or work order is terminated because of the decision of the Minnesota legislature or other funding source, not to appropriate funds. The State must provide the Local Government notice of the lack of funding within a reasonable time of the State’s receiving that notice. 22. Data Disclosure Under Minn. Stat. §270C.65, subd. 3, and other applicable law, the Local Government consents to disclosure of its federal employer tax identification number, and/or Minnesota tax identification number, already provided to the State, to federal and state tax agencies and state personnel involved in the Page 12 of 14 CM Master Partnership Contract (CM Rev. 10/05/2015) City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Resolution Approving Master Partnership Contract with MnDOT Page 14 MnDOT Agreement # 1001924 payment of state obligations. These identification numbers may be used in the enforcement of federal and state tax laws which could result in action requiring the Local Government to file state tax returns and pay delinquent state tax liabilities, if any. 23. Defense of Claims and Lawsuits If any lawsuit or claim is filed by a third party (including but not limited to the Local Government’s contractors and subcontractors), arising out of trunk highway work performed pursuant to a valid work order issued under this Master Contract, the Local Government will, at the discretion of and upon the request of the State, tender the defense of such claims to the State or allow the State to participate in the defense of such claims. The Local Government will, however, be solely responsible for defending any lawsuit or claim, or any portion thereof, when the claim or cause of action asserted is based on its own acts or omissions in performing or supervising the work. The Local Government will not purport to represent the State in any litigation, settlement, or alternative dispute resolution process. The State will not be responsible for any judgment entered against the Local Government, and will not be bound by the terms of any settlement entered into by the Local Government except with the written approval of the Attorney General and the Commissioner of Transportation and pursuant to applicable law. 24. Additional Provisions [The balance of this page has intentionally been left blank – signature page follows] Page 13 of 14 CM Master Partnership Contract (CM Rev. 10/05/2015) City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Resolution Approving Master Partnership Contract with MnDOT Page 15 MnDOT Agreement # 1001924 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION The Local Government certifies that the appropriate person(s) have executed the contract on behalf of the Local Government as required by applicable ordinance, resolution, or charter provision. By: By: (with delegated authority) Title: Title Division Director Date: Date: By: COMMISSIONER OF ADMINISTRATION As delegated to Materials Management Division Title By: Date: Date: Page 14 of 14 CM Master Partnership Contract (CM Rev. 10/05/2015) City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4f) Title: Resolution Approving Master Partnership Contract with MnDOT Page 16 Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 4, 2016 Consent Agenda Item: 4g OFFICIAL MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA FEBRUARY 17, 2016 – 6:08 p.m. COUNCIL CHAMBERS MEMBERS PRESENT: Lynne Carper, Claudia Johnston-Madison, Lisa Peilen, Joe Tatalovich MEMBERS ABSENT: Richard Person, Carl Robertson, Ethan Rickert (youth member) STAFF PRESENT: Sean Walther, Julie Grove, Gary Morrison OTHERS PRESENT: Jeff Miller, HKGi Planning Consultant 1. Call to Order – Roll Call 2. Approval of Minutes of February 3, 2016 Commissioner Tatalovich made a motion recommending approval of the minutes of February 3, 2016. Commissioner Peilen seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 4-0. 3. Public Hearings A. Preliminary and Final Plat; Preliminary and Final PUD Arlington Row Apartments East Location: 7700 block, south side Wayzata Blvd. between Rhode Island and Pennsylvania Ave. Applicant: Melrose Company, LLC Case No.: 16-02-S and 16-03-PUD Julie Grove, Economic Development Specialist, presented the staff report. The requests are made to allow construction of a three-story multi-family residential building that includes a total of 27 units. Ms. Grove provided background on the site, noting that a “sister” development Arlington Row Apartments West was approved by the City Council in November, 2015. She stated that the Metropolitan Council awarded the Arlington Row West & East developments a $581,000 Livable Communities demonstration grant for stormwater, geothermal and solar/energy efficiency. Ms. Grove discussed utility easements and subdivision variance being requested as part of the plat request. She provided building and site analysis, zoning analysis, traffic study summary, landscaping, and designed outdoor recreation area analysis for the Planned Unit Development. City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No.4g) Page 2 Title: Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of February 17, 2016 Ms. Grove spoke about the neighborhood meeting which was held on February 9, 2016 on the proposed development. She said the primary concerns regard increased traffic and parking along 13th Lane. Other concerns included height and scale of the building and negative impact on property values. Ms. Grove said since the meeting, planning and engineering staff have been working with the developer to explore potential ways to alleviate parking concerns on 13th Lane. Commissioner Peilen asked if construction had begun on Arlington Row Apts. West. Ms. Grove responded that phased construction is anticipated to commence on Arlington Row West in the spring. Commissioner Peilen asked what kind of progress is being made on parking concerns on 13th Lane. Ms. Grove responded staff is looking at several options. She said there will be a process but perhaps parking could be limited on only one side of the street. The potential for installing a parking bay on the north side had been ruled out. Commissioner Carper asked the maximum capacity on 13 Lane from corner to corner. Bob Cunningham, principal Melrose Company, applicant, responded that the capacity adjacent to the development is approximately 10 stalls. Commissioner Carper asked about guest parking. Ms. Grove responded that guest parking is incorporated into the required parking. Commissioner Carper asked about affordable housing. Ms. Grove said with the grant received from Met Council, the developer had indicated they would incorporate 6 affordable units total at the complete development (West and East) at 80% of area median income. Commissioner Carper asked about the sidewalk. Ms. Grove responded the sidewalk will just be along the property line. She said the hope is that eventually it will connect to Pennsylvania Ave. which does have a sidewalk. Commissioner Carper asked if the Designed Outdoor Recreation Area (DORA) would be fenced off. He asked about south facing building materials. Ms. Grove responded the DORA will be an open design. She said there is less area of class I materials on the south primarily resulting from the building design and natural breaks in the façade. Mr. Cunningham, said apartment residents will be issued a parking sticker. Non-assigned resident parking and non-assigned guest parking will be inside the project. Two electric car plug-ins will be added. He said the development is 100% market rate apartments. In City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No.4g) Page 3 Title: Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of February 17, 2016 conjunction with the Met Council grant, Melrose agreed to 10% threshold over Arlington Row East and West together. That would be 6 units. He added that seventeen of the market rate units are affordable at 80% of the area median income without subsidy, rather on a market rate basis in the developers own pro forma. Mr. Cunningham said even though the sidewalk is just along the property line, a connection has been created from 13th Lane to Wayzata Blvd. on the west side of the property. He said the DORA will not be fenced. It will be a landscaped lawn. Raised garden beds will be included. The DORA is not a neighborhood type park, it is provided for residents of Arlington Row East. He said the development is being proposed at this location as it is one of the very few infill lots left in St. Louis Park and it is very well located less than 1,000 ft. away from a high volume transit facility. He spoke about indoor bike parking which will be available. Mike Engel, ESG Architects, further discussed the exterior materials and reasons for the selections. Chair Johnston-Madison opened the public hearing. Jana Agrey, 7611 13th Lane, has lived there over 25 years. She said she is disappointed. She didn’t expect the property would remain vacant but she didn’t expect to have a 3- story apartment building with tons of traffic on the street. She said there is already parking overflow from the building at Pennsylvania and Wayzata Blvd. She said getting onto the frontage road is already difficult. She spoke about a letter she received from a mortgage company recently soliciting to sell her property. She said neighbors are also getting similar letters and phone calls. She wonders if they are going to be pushed out or forced out. Joy Preston, 7621 13th Lane, said she shares the same concerns. Neighbors did not expect a 3-story building on the lot two stories higher than the one-story single family homes. It is kind of shocking. She said her household has three cars and a shared driveway. During snow emergencies cars have to be juggled around. If there is parking on 13th Lane, one- side of the street, she will lose parking for her household. Curb to curb plowing does not occur. Space is lost on a narrow road and tight corner. There are concerns about school bus coming down there with parking on both sides of the street. Yvette Peters-Hutchins, 7721 13th Lane, discussed the plat drawing. She said 13th between Texas and Rhode Island goes straight into her driveway. She said she measured the street distance curb to curb which is about 26 ft. wide. With snow it is about 25 feet. Her truck is 8 feet wide, a standard Nissan Maxima is about 6 - 7ft. wide, a fire engine truck is about 8 feet wide not including mirrors and 24 ft. long, a garage truck is 8 ½ feet not including mirrors, and an ambulance is 8 feet wide not including mirrors. She said if cars are parked on both sides of the street on Rhode Island and in front of her property, emergency vehicles will not be able to get through. School buses often get stuck. She said it is alarming. Parking is a problem. In her front yard she will be looking at a building that will be 36 ½ ft. high. She said she has already contacted a realtor because she can’t look at that. She said it is a very quiet, great neighborhood with no crime and no issues. She spoke about an apartment complex on Pennsylvania which has weekly police calls. City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No.4g) Page 4 Title: Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of February 17, 2016 She said she’s concerned with Arlington’s lack of parking, high prices, no underground parking in the winter, that it won’t be desirable. What about fifteen years down the road when people don’t want to pay those prices without underground parking. She said residents will be encouraged to park on the street as it will be more convenient. She said she is alarmed about this area of St. Louis Park. She said it is a make it or break it project. Chair Johnston-Madison asked if the neighbors had any suggestions about parking. Ms. Peters-Hutchins responded yes, saying permit parking for residents on the street would be great. She said the residents of the apartment complex could park in their parking lot or not park at all. John Johnson, 7701 13th Lane, stated he agrees with his neighbors. He doesn’t want to look at the building. There are parking and emergency vehicle issues. He said the Texas/Wayzata intersection is already dangerous. It doesn’t need to become more dangerous. He wonders what the big picture is. Do they want to put in more apartments? Do they want to force the neighborhood out? He said he has a retirement plan and this does not work for his plan. He said he is very disappointed. He does not want the project to go forward. The neighborhood is a great place to live. They don’t need more traffic. They don’t need any more crime. Anthony Hutchins, 7721 13th Lane, said he was concerned about taxes going up because the waste water system can’t support the additional load of the development. He said the schools are already over capacity. He said the schools will not acknowledge that there are drugs in the schools. He said if the new development brings in kids there will be problems. He said a lot of the kids in the Pennsylvania Ave. apartments are on drugs and sell drugs in the parks. He said there are drugs in that Section 8 apartment building all of the time. He said if the new development brings in Section 8, the same thing will happen. There goes the neighborhood. He asked if additional policing will be provided. Chair Johnston-Madison stated that the new development is not Section 8 housing. It is market rate affordable housing. Sean Walther, Planning and Zoning Supervisor, explained the Section 8, or housing choice voucher program, and explained that affordable housing does not equate to low income housing. Arlington Row Apartments is not subsidized or low income housing. The one bedroom unit rents at approx. $1,100 are market rate and affordable at 80% of the area median income. The median income means that half the households in the metro area make more than that and half the people in the metro area make less than that. He said in St. Louis Park and the metro area, 80% of the area median income is not low income. It is simply affordable. Sharon Desaimeaux, 7720 W. 13 ½ St., stated that last summer there was a drug bust in the apartment buildings on Pennsylvania. She said she doesn’t want to see that happen on 13th. She said she sees who lives in those buildings. They walk down her street. She said she is starting to feel uncomfortable. If you put housing like this in the next block she doesn’t want to live in fear. City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No.4g) Page 5 Title: Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of February 17, 2016 Mr. Cunningham said a lot of thought was given regarding parking for the project. He said the only point of ingress and egress for the parking lot is going to be off of Wayzata. Access is not on 13th Lane. Parking, ingress and egress, will be away from the neighbors. He said that isn’t to say that residents or guests will not be parking on 13th Lane, but it will be more convenient for residents to park in the parking lot. Mr. Cunningham commented on letters and calls residents received from mortgage companies. He stated that Melrose Company is not involved in that in any way. Regarding waste water and stormwater, he said the Engineering Dept. has determined there are adequate utilities to service the project. Stormwater cannot leave a site at any faster rate than it does now. No additional burden will be placed on the stormwater system. The Chair closed the public hearing as there was no one else present wishing to speak. Commissioner Peilen and Mr. Cunningham discussed background checks that are conducted on rental applications. Commissioner Peilen discussed in detail background checks that are important to any responsible property manager. Chair Johnston-Madison discussed changes to neighborhoods. She spoke about the city task force that was created to review vacant lots, and she had participated. She said Arlington Row is a good project and she is very familiar with Mr. Cunningham and Excelsior & Grand. She said she knows the thought and care that has gone into his previous projects. She said Mr. Cunningham is one of the best developers. Commissioner Carper spoke about a property owner’s right to develop when city requirements are met. He said he routinely receives inquiries from realtors about his home. He said he had a tear down and rebuild on his street and is familiar with change. He said Arlington Row is a quality development and there isn’t any reason to deny the request. Commissioner Peilen said she liked the possibility of having permit parking for residents on 13th Street. She spoke about her own street where that occurred with a restaurant development. Commissioner Tatalovich said he agreed with Commissioner Peilen about permit parking. He made a motion recommending approval of the Preliminary and Final Plat with subdivision variance; and the Arlington Row East Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development. He asked that staff and developer continue to work on the parking and traffic situation on 13th Lane. Commissioner Peilen seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 4-0. B. Conditional Use Permit – Mister Car Wash Location: 8700 Highway 7 Applicant: Mister Car Wash (Sheldon Berg, DJR Architecture) Case No.: 15-51-CUP City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No.4g) Page 6 Title: Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of February 17, 2016 Jeff Miller, HKGi Planning Consultant, presented the staff report. The request is in connection with a proposed expansion of an existing carwash building. The applicant wishes to rescind the existing special permit to allow a carwash in the FEMA floodplain, and replace it with a conditional use permit to allow a carwash located in the FEMA floodplain. Mr. Miller reviewed conditions of approval. Chair Johnston-Madison spoke about the new entrance at 37th. She remarked that she understands the elevation of the road will be changed at some point. Mr. Miller said the applicants are aware that the elevation will change in conjunction with the bridge replacement project. Commissioner Carper asked about flooding and the design of the building. Mr. Miller said the western portion of the site that is in the flood fringe overlay district needs to be able to flood internally. He said that is the case here. It would flood internally on the site, not the building, and not into the creek. Tim Vaughan, owner and applicant, explained that the proposal is a way to improve the efficiency and internal circulation of the car wash and the site. The Chair opened the public hearing. As no one was present wishing to speak, she closed the public hearing. Commissioner Carper made a motion recommending approval of rescinding the existing special permit and approving a conditional use permit to allow a carwash located in the FEMA floodplain with conditions as recommended by staff. Commissioner Tatalovich seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 4-0. C. Microdistillery & Microdistillery Cocktail Rooms – Zoning Ordinance Amendment Applicant: City of St. Louis Park Case No.: 16-04-ZA Gary Morrison, Assistant Zoning Administrator, presented the staff report. The amendment is being proposed in connection with the recently amended City liquor license ordinance creating a license for microdistillery cocktail rooms and an off-sale license for microdistilleries. Commissioner Carper asked about the definition of co-location. Mr. Morrison responded that co-location is addressed in a couple of ways in the liquor license amendment. No single ownership can have both a taproom and a cocktail room. A taproom can be operated by a brewery within the premises or an adjacent property and the same holds true in a microdistillery in that building or adjacent property. He looks at it as a multi-tenant industrial facility (two businesses next to each other). In co-location a taproom would not be able to sell cocktails in the same facility. Mr. Morrison spoke City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No.4g) Page 7 Title: Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of February 17, 2016 about ownership groups and the liquor ordinance as far as who is getting a license. He said he would look at the ordinance to confirm this. The Chair opened the public hearing. As no one else was present wishing to speak, she closed the public hearing. Commissioner Peilen made a motion recommending approval of the Zoning Ordinance Amendment pertaining to microdistilleries and microdistillery cocktail rooms. Commissioner Tatalovich seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 4-0. 4. Other Business: None 5. Communications Mr. Walther reminded Commissioners about the February 22, 2016 boards and commissions’ annual meeting with City Council. Mr. Walther noted that the City Council appointed Torrey Kanne to the Planning Commission. 6. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 7:45 p.m. A study session regarding proposed amendments to the subdivision ordinance began at 7:50 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Nancy Sells Sr. Office Assistant Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 4, 2016 Consent Agenda Item: 4h OFFICIAL MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA MARCH 2, 2016 – 6:00 p.m. COUNCIL CHAMBERS MEMBERS PRESENT: Lynne Carper, Claudia Johnston-Madison, Torrey Kanne, Richard Person, Carl Robertson, Ethan Rickert (youth member) MEMBERS ABSENT: Lisa Peilen, Joe Tatalovich STAFF PRESENT: Sean Walther, Gary Morrison OTHER: Jeff Miller, HKGi Planning Consultant 1. Call to Order – Roll Call 2. Approval of Minutes: None 3. Public Hearings A. Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning and Variance for Proposed Daycare Location: 2460 Highway 100 South Applicant: New Horizon Academy Daycare Case Nos.: 16-07-CP, 16-08-Z, 16-09-VAR Jeff Miller, HKGi Planning Consultant, presented the staff report. He stated that the site currently contains a one-story, 10,140 square foot office building. The applicant proposes to open and operate a daycare facility. Mr. Miller explained how both the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and rezoning from office to commercial are appropriate for the property. Mr. Miller provided a zoning analysis of the variance request to the C-1 Neighborhood Commercial requirement that a daycare’s outdoor play area be located a minimum of 200 feet from any roadway defined on the comprehensive plan as a principal arterial. He showed the site and the proposed outdoor play area. He reviewed how criteria for granting the variance request have been met. Commissioner Robertson asked if it was ever considered to do a text amendment to allow daycare in the Office district. He asked the rationale for not allowing daycare as a principal use. City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No.4h) Page 2 Title: Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of March 2, 2016 Sean Walther, Planning and Zoning Supervisor, responded that staff was primarily looking to maintain the integrity of the Office district and not wanting existing office spaces to be converted wholly over to daycare use. Office District is seen as an employment center. He said the daycare was seen as an amenity or resource service for employees in that area. Peter Hilger, Rylaur LLC, architect, provided background on New Horizon’s search for a site in St. Louis Park. He said New Horizon is very much looking forward to being in St. Louis Park. Commissioner Person spoke about a daycare site he was familiar with which he felt had inadequate outdoor space. He said the site configuration of the proposed outdoor space does not seem adequate for the number of children proposed for the facility. Mr. Hilger said daycare playgrounds are regulated in terms of the number of children who can be outdoors at any given time, related to size and staffing. He spoke about the playground surface material. He said a huge investment is made in the playgrounds in order to satisfy parents’ expectations. Mr. Miller noted that the proposal does exceed both city and state requirements for open play area space. Chair Johnston-Madison opened the public hearing. Kathryn McKeen, 2834 Vernon Ave. S., said she thinks the idea of the daycare sounds pretty good but she is concerned about traffic. She spoke about existing heavy traffic on Vernon Ave. from the apartment building, bus traffic, traffic from the new West End, and fast moving vehicles coming off Hwy. 100 onto Vernon to avoid Hwy. 100. Ms. McKeen said she is concerned about 100 parents driving through her neighborhood at both rush hours. The Chair asked about sidewalk on Vernon Ave. Mr. Walther said sidewalk is intermittent along Utica Avenue which is planned to have a complete trail connection to the regional trail in the future under the city’s sidewalk and trail plan. Sharon Lehrman, 2610 Vernon Ave. S., directly behind the former church, said she has similar concerns related to traffic. Her family uses the frontage road quite frequently because of their location. With all the development in the old Nestle plant area the traffic has greatly increased along the frontage road and in that area, including truck traffic. She said she understood previous interest in daycare at the church site was not pursued by an applicant because of traffic issues and concerns of parents not being able to get in and out easily to drop off and pick up their children during rush hour. Ms. Lehrman said it is not known currently what kind of traffic will be generated from whatever use locates at the former church site. She stated she likes the idea of having a daycare facility but she is very concerned with all the congestion in the area. She spoke about traffic trips predicted by staff. City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No.4h) Page 3 Title: Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of March 2, 2016 No one else was present wishing to speak. The Chair closed the public hearing. Commissioner Robertson said a reguiding and rezoning to Neighborhood Commercial stands on its own merit for the site. He said he doesn’t have any issues with the variance request because of the elevation differences in the road in question. Chair Johnston-Madison said she understands traffic concerns. She said there will be traffic no matter what goes in there. She asked if there is a way to examine traffic in the area and what is coming in the future. Mr. Walther said traffic studies are not warranted unless there is a significant increase in traffic generated by a new use or development. Even the major renovation of the Westside Center did not warrant a traffic study because the former Nestle plant had been among the largest employers in the city. Changeover for that building to the renovation and employment levels it has now is similar to the previous use and the amount traffic generated for that operation. In addition, specifically looking at the proposed daycare site, the office use is one of the highest density/highest intensity uses in the city. He said in many ways this site has already been maximized with the existing 10,000 sq. ft. building, unless structured parking was provided. Longer term the change to Neighborhood Commercial makes sense. He said in the next two to three years the Comprehensive Plan will be looking at transportation and land uses citywide. Commissioner Person said he agreed that it makes sense to rezone the property. He added that he thinks the facility will be crowded inside and outside with 160 children, but that he supports the proposal. Commissioner Carper said the proposal is a good use of the site. Commissioner Robertson made a motion to recommend approval of the Comprehensive Plan amendment, the rezoning, and the variance for proposed daycare at 2460 State Highway 100. Commissioner Carper seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 5-0. B. Amendments to the Subdivision Ordinance Applicant: City of St. Louis Park Case No.: 16-05-ZA Gary Morrison, Assistant Zoning Administrator, presented the staff report. The intent of the amendments are to update the design standards and make clarifications. He discussed proposed changes. The proposed ordinance was presented to the Planning Commission at study sessions on February 3 and February 17, 2016. He discussed one new clarification which doesn’t appear in the staff report regarding publicly owned property exemption. The new language narrows the process to right-of-way land only. Commissioner Robertson asked about the rules for easements in the subdivision process. Mr. Morrison said it is stated that easements are required but may be modified by the Engineering Department. City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No.4h) Page 4 Title: Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of March 2, 2016 The Chair opened the public hearing. No one was present wishing to speak. The Chair closed the public hearing. Commissioner Carper made a motion recommending approval of the amendments to the Subdivision Ordinance. Commissioner Person seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 5-0. 4. Other Business Mr. Walther introduced the new commissioner Torrey Kanne. Ms. Kanne said she is a resident in the Elmwood neighborhood and she is glad to be part of the Planning Commission. Mr. Walther discussed changes to the rules and procedures of boards and commissions made by the City Council. Commissioners Person and Johnston-Madison spoke about the recent Boards and Commissions Annual Meeting with the City Council. 5. Communications 6. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 6:55 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Nancy Sells, Office Assistant Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 4, 2016 Consent Agenda Item: 4i OFFICIAL MINUTES OF JULY 23, 2015 BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK The St. Louis Park Board of Zoning Appeals conducted a meeting on July 23, 2015, at St. Louis Park City Hall, 5005 Minnetonka Boulevard, St. Louis Park, Minnesota – Council Chambers. Members Present: Paul Roberts, Susan Bloyer, James Gainsley, Henry Solmer Members Absent: Justin Kaufman Staff Present: Gary Morrison, Assistant Zoning Administrator Nancy Sells, Administrative Secretary 1. CALL TO ORDER – ROLL CALL Chair Roberts called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF MAY 28, 2015 Commissioner Gainsley made a motion to approve the minutes of May 28, 2015. The motion passed on a vote of 4-0. 3. CONSENT AGENDA: None 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Variance: Front Setback Location: 3771 Kipling Avenue South Applicant: Beth and Zach Klawitter Case No.: 15-23-VAR Gary Morrison, Assistant Zoning Administrator, presented the staff report. He discussed that they proposal is to construct an addition to the front of the house and to complete this, they need a four-foot variance to the required 34.9’ front yard setback requirement. The property is zoned R2, single family residential and is approximate 6,780 sq. ft. in area. The lot width is 50’ and the minimum is 60’. The lot is approximate 135’ deep. The property has a detached garage located in the back with access out to Kipling. The proposed addition is to enclose the entryway and the kitchen addition to the side. The floor plan is included in the report and shows the existing and proposed conditions. They are primarily looking at the kitchen area. They currently have a pass-through kitchen with appliances and counters on the interior wall and some cupboards and a sink on the exterior wall and the covered stoop to the right of the kitchen. The counter and cupboard space in the existing kitchen compared to the proposal is relatively the same before and after the addition. The primary change was the addition of an island in the kitchen and the walk space behind it, which separated it from the kitchen and an enclosed entryway to the right of the kitchen. City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4i) Page 2 Title: Board of Zoning Appeals Meeting Minutes of July 23, 2015 The front yard setback requirement came into play in 2005, after the result of a study that took several months. Before the existing regulation came into play, they used to have an averaging formula looking at the properties 150’ in either direction and averaged the existing setbacks to come up with what they had. The disadvantage of that was it wasn’t very intuitive, but also if you have a house that is out front, all of the other ones could never match it. There was also the question of equity and fairness. Alternatives were considered and they looked at every block in the city to find out what each block was like. While there are many similarities, there were many differences block to block. When St. Louis Park was developed, it was the first house that was built on that block that determined the setback for that block and all of the other houses had to match it or be further back. That was why there are different setbacks from block to block. Many cities determined the setback with the zoning. They looked at that as an option when they did the study, but the feedback was overwhelming that they didn’t want a standardized setback because part of the character of St. Louis Park is how it developed over time. The front setback is a key part of that character. That option was thrown out. The next option they came up with was what they adopted today. They look at the house closest to the front property line to establish the setback for that block. It works out pretty good. In the R2 district, there is a minimum of 25’ and it is the greater of the two. There are a couple exceptions that were introduced at that time. The open covered porch was included as an exception to the front setback rule and that was a result of character of St. Louis Park and the intent of having eyes on the street. They are considered to be aesthetically pleasing and encourage people to go in the front yard and engage one another and keep their eyes on the street. Another exclusion is the enclosed entryway. A lot of houses go right into the living room and it is nice to have a little space out front where you can have an enclosed area for a closet and put shoes. They debated and ended up on 5’ x 8’. As they look at the block that was the subject of today’s application, the existing setback to the North the houses line up. As you go to the South, it steps back about five feet. You see a couple bump outs and those are enclosed entryways. They measure this setback to the main wall of the house. The neighboring house to the North is shown to match up to the applicants and as you extend south, it matches with the front of the entryway, but that is an exception. The variance is required for the kitchen portion. Staff is recommending denial of the application and the findings are listed in the report. There was a petition submitted from the neighbors in support of the variance request. Chair Roberts noted the petition would be submitted as Exhibit A into the public record. Zach Klawitter, applicants, stated in addition to the petition, they had letters from neighbors on Kipling to be made part of the record (Exhibits B, C, D). Beth Klawitter stated the reason they were appealing was because they love where they live and love the neighborhood. They want to stay in St. Louis Park. They have three kids under six and it was important to them as a family. They love their house and have been there for eight years and have great relationships with their neighbors. It was pointed out that it was only the island, but it was more than that. It was part of the flow of the home and where they gather. They also use the space for family celebrations. City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4i) Page 3 Title: Board of Zoning Appeals Meeting Minutes of July 23, 2015 Mr. Klawitter added that they moved into an entry-level house and had done a lot of improvements and remodeling and had done it right. They had increased the property value. They had the support of their neighbors. The last room of the house that needed work was the kitchen. They had looked at many options and couldn’t do anything but move toward the street. It was the last option and would not be intrusive to the neighbors. Commissioner Gainsley asked if they felt there were no alternative proposals that would not require a variance? Mr. Klawitter replied no. Commissioner Solmer asked if they had looked into the possibility of relocating the kitchen? Ms. Klawitter replied they had and Sicora Building came in with different design potentials and this was the best recommendation from the designer for what they were trying to accomplish. Because the kitchen is in the front of the house, in order for them to move the kitchen anywhere else, it would require extensive relocation of mechanicals and would not be possible with a growing family. Allison Landers, Sicora Building Solution for Small Houses designer, stated she does design for resident in St. Louis Park and people go to her to find solutions for small homes. In the past, a lot of people have felt that bigger is better. She had worked with a lot of clients with ramblers and relocating kitchens by flipping them to the other side of the stairs and it is very expensive. She tries to have small steps and small pieces and try to be efficient and sustainable. They are trying not to relocate the kitchen and maintain the integrity of the home. Character had been brought up and Sicora Homes is known for their character in the community. They don’t do really giant additions and take pride in craftsmanship and small and petite solutions for growing families. They try to be efficient with their designs and bigger isn’t always better. Commissioner Gainsley asked if she was knowledgeable with the zoning ordinance? Ms. Landers replied she would never claim expertise in something that she didn’t do every single day. She was here to represent why they designed what they did. Chair Roberts opened the public hearing. As no one else was present wishing to speak, Chair Roberts closed the public hearing. Commissioner Gainsley explained that the problem was the front yard aspect was almost “black letter” law and cast in concrete. There was no way to get around it. What they were doing did not fall into any of the exceptions and there were no practical difficulties with rivers or rocks and there was no hardship. It was a matter of being the way the owner wanted to go and what the designer designed. If they did it, it would be contrary to the Compressive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance. Since they didn’t have a choice, he could not approve a variance for this. Commissioner Solmer thanked Mr. Morrison for the historical background of how they got here on the ordinance. That tells there were previous struggles on expanding toward the street and the intent of the current ordinance is to make a final decision on that and he didn’t think they wanted to reopen that topic. City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4i) Page 4 Title: Board of Zoning Appeals Meeting Minutes of July 23, 2015 Commissioner Bloyer agreed and remembered the history of front yard debate. The only thing that gave her pause was that they didn’t have any options and that was the one thing that bothered her about this. She was only thinking of the water being a huge problem and not even the mechanicals. She would like to see there being a way to do it, but at the moment she hadn’t heard anything that would let her do it either. Chair Roberts agreed with the rest of the board members. They are a judicial board and have to look at law in front of them. They could all understand what they were trying to accomplish and have empathy for what they were trying to do, but their job was to look at the ordinances and the zoning to come up with the correct solution based on that. He didn’t see another way for them to do it based on the zoning. They have use of the house and use of the property. There is nothing wrong with how the property is laid out that was preventing this, but the zoning calls for the front yard setback to be such as it. Commissioner Gainsley made a motion to adopt a resolution denying an application for a 4.0 foot variance to the required 34.9 foot front yard at 3771 Kipling Avenue South. The motion to deny was approved on a vote of 4-0. Commissioner Gainsley noted that the applicants always have the right of appeal. Chair Roberts stated that there is a 10-day appeal process where they can appeal to the City Council. Mr. Morrison noted an appeal needed to be made to the Assistant Zoning Administrator. They had ten days from today. 5. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: None 6. NEW BUSINESS: None 7. COMMUNICATIONS Mr. Morrison reviewed previous BOZA cases and Council actions. 8. ADJOURN The meeting was adjourned at 6:40 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Amy Stegora-Peterson/ns Recording Secretary Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 4, 2016 Consent Agenda Item: 4j MINUTES ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY COMMISSION: SUSTAINABLE SLP ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA February 3, 2016 Community Room, City Hall MEMBERS PRESENT: Chris Anderson, Terry Gips, Ryan Griffin; Rachel Harris, Nancy Rose, Jayne Stevenson, Judy Voigt. EXCUSED ABSENCE: Renee McGarvey, Cindy Larson-O’Neil STAFF PRESENT: Shannon Pinc, City Staff; Recording Secretary (Mary Pappas). GUESTS: None. 1. The meeting was called to order at 6:30 p.m. Introductions were made. 2. The minutes of the December 2, 2015 and the January 6, 2016 meeting were approved unanimously. Business – a. Annual Report to Council – Shannon reviewed the overall priorities and thanked the Commission for their feedback on the template she had begun. She noted she had summarized the information submitted by each work group and if there are changes, she needs them by end of the day tomorrow. Rachel thanked Shannon for a great job, stating the work of the groups has expanded 10- fold, with many accomplishments. She stated this is an amazing report and added her appreciation to the work group leaders for getting their information in on time. Shannon asked the group who would be in attendance at the Council meeting and who would like to present, with the use of visual aids. There are three focus areas to review with the Council: visioning, climate action plan, and Green Step Cities plan. Rachel noted in the past, the chair and vice chair have presented to the Council. Shannon would help facilitate. b. Retreat comments on priorities and meetings – Shannon summarized what was discussed. She noted the work group priorities summary stating that each group chose three priorities to work on this year. Shannon asked the Commission for further input. The Commission agreed three priorities per group is a lot, in light of limited capacity. They agreed also they must be careful of overextending their work groups, or burdening the Commissioners, who are volunteers. Rachel presented a Gant Chart, which showed a timeline of projects and priorities that work groups could use as a tool for time managements. They discussed the fact that 24 goals may be overreaching. Prioritizing will be helpful and the Commission will look at various City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4j) Page 2 Title: Environment & Sustainability Commission: Sustainable SLP Meeting Minutes of February 3, 2016 tools for doing this, along with better meeting format, possibly longer meetings, and earlier agenda planning. The group also discussed Trello, Excel, Microsoft Project and various project management tools. The Commission agreed the chair, vice chair and Shannon will select the final version/tool to use, after reviewing all with the Commissioners first. Ryan also pointed out that the Planning Commission meets on the same evening at the Environment and Sustainability Commission (ESC). Although there are two Planning Commission meetings each month, it is critical that one of the Commissioners attend the Planning Commission meeting each month, especially with the review and work coming up on the Comprehensive Plan. Chris noted they may want to look at moving the ESC meetings to a different day. Ryan added the ESC could schedule study sessions after the Commission meetings and/or work group meetings with breakout sessions, in addition to Commission meetings, in order to complete the work that is needed. This will be discussed further after the new Commissioners are selected. c. Update on potential solar projects for Municipal Service Building and Fire Station 2 including Made in Minnesota – Shannon stated she has been exploring projects that can be conducted with the City, and added that Cindy will report on the Partners in Energy Plan at the next meeting. Shannon summarized the MSC project noting the newer area of flat sunny roof would fit a solar system, and this would be an opportunity to offset electricity use on that building. She added a solar company would do the install. She added that access is an issue with the Fire Station 2, but if it did work, Made in MN could do the project. Nancy asked the timing on this project. Shannon noted the MSC project could begin in the spring. Chair Gips noted the importance of being transparent on this issue, especially in the bidding process. Local developers should be aware of the opportunity. d. Energy Work Group updates - In Cindy’s absence, there was no report from the Work Group. Jayne Stevenson described a project of the Roots & Shoots group at the High School to conduct an Environmental audit of St. Louis Park, using the iMatter Youth scoring system. The audit is complete, and Jayne will try to get 700 student signatures on petitions, then present them to the City Council. Jayne is requesting the support of the Commission and Partners in Energy. Chair Gips stated it is difficult to approve the scorecard at this point. Shannon noted she will send more detail to the Commission to review on this program, prior to presenting to the Council. Motion was made and seconded to unanimously support the effort of Roots and Shoots and iMatter Youth, to present their findings to the Council. A friendly amendment was made to support the presentation to the Council; however, the Commission has not reviewed and is not making a statement about methodology and grades related to the scorecard. The friendly amendment was seconded and passed unanimously. City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4j) Page 3 Title: Environment & Sustainability Commission: Sustainable SLP Meeting Minutes of February 3, 2016 e. Water-Land-Wildlife Update – Nancy explained that Jo Colleran, a St. Louis Park resident, had agreed to join the work group. She is a resident on Cobblecrest Lake and is the Natural Resources Manager for the City of Minnetonka. Nancy also explained the upcoming Westwood Nature Center building proposal. She noted Miller-Dunwiddie will report on nature center features preferences from public input sessions and postcards. She said this would most likely be reported at the Park Board meeting on February 17th. She added the Great River Greening report on vegetation plan will be presented later. Nancy stated the Nature Center does not have an overall vision/mission statement, and may be interested in developing one. She added the Commission will need to develop a statement on the purpose of the nature center – and it will be needed soon. She added she will know more by the end of this week, and she will begin work on a vision statement for the Nature Center and send it to the Commissioners for input. Afterwards, it can be prepared to present to Council, possibly later in March. Statements for Eloise Butler Wildflower Garden and Woodlake Nature Center will be reviewed for models. f. Approval of Polystyrene To-Go position – The position statement was sent out prior to the meeting but voting on approving the statement was tabled until March so commissioners could review it again. g. Other Work Group Updates – Green Step Cities committee needs to review some items with Shannon. The MPCA Green Steps webinar on the new Best Practice 29, Resilience, will be held Tues Feb 9 from 9 -11 a.m. Shannon will be presenting. Transportation work group update – Ryan said they had a good meeting but there was some resistance and City staff seemed to feel the Commission is trying to tell them what to do. He added the intent of meeting was to help conceptualize the Living Streets concept and noted that engineering, planning and Shannon were in attendance, along with the ESC. Some are comprehensive plan and some are engineering issues, and according to Ryan, it is unclear what the function is of the Commission when working on policies. Shannon noted it is unclear on how the Commission is directed by Council and City Staff. Chair Gips suggested that Tom Harmening be brought in the conversations, to help with direction and alignment. Ryan will work with Shannon on this evolving process. Rachel added did work on some positive next steps, which involved a strategic summary. She added that engineering is interested in helping draft a policy. She also stated the work group is looking for a new lead, and Paul and Mark were emailed also to see if they would like to remain on the group or not. The Commissioners agreed when working with City Staff, a more collaborative atmosphere is needed. h. Upcoming Events – State of the City, Metrocerts, and Organic Living Workshop – Shannon would like to know which Commissioners can be in attendance at these events, what time and when. She also asked that the Commissioner let her know what materials should be at the table, and noted she can repurpose existing materials, and use existing posters. City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4j) Page 4 Title: Environment & Sustainability Commission: Sustainable SLP Meeting Minutes of February 3, 2016 Additionally, Shannon will let the Commissioners know about the State of the City Event – to be held end of February. i. Elections for Chair and Vice Chair – Chair Gips opened the floor for nominations for Chair. Nancy nominated Rachel as Chair and it was seconded by Chris. Rachel stated her vision and noted that being on the Commission has been one of her proudest contributions. She added that all the work groups are great and the Commission is really starting to cultivate strong teamwork. She has been honored to serve as Vice Chair and wants to serve the Commissions needs and desires in the coming months. The Commission voted and Rachel was unanimously elected Chair. Chair Gips opened the floor for nominations for Vice Chair and Rachel nominated Chris as Vice Chair, which was seconded by Judy. Chris stated he has been on the Commission for two years and will do whatever he needs to in order to support with work being done and also to help support Rachel as Chair. The Commission voted and Chris was unanimously elected at Vice Chair. j. Thoughts from outgoing Chair – Chair Gips shared a few thoughts as he is now completing his term. He thanked the Commissioners and said it has been a joy and a privilege working with them. He said he is impressed by each of the Commissioners and their commitment, vision, and hard work, along with their giving up of personal things to help make St. Louis Park better and be a model as a municipality in order to inspire others. He added it has been very moving for him to hear what each member is doing, and the amazing amount of work. He noted he has been with the Commission since its inception as a task force, and added it is amazing what’s been created, amidst challenges. He said he has appreciated each Commissioner and their hard work. He apologized if he had not answered emails or disappointed or hurt any of the Commissioners throughout their interactions and added his main concern has been to help support their visions. He also stated how grateful he is to Shannon and thanked her for all of her work and her skill and heart for connecting with people, while assisting the Commission. He congratulated Rachel and Chris as the new Chair and Vice Chair, and said he will support them in any way he can. He hopes to stay involved in the Commission going forward also. Shannon also thanked Chair Gips for his work and for helping her get up and running as she joined the City Staff. The meeting was adjourned at 8:29 p.m. Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 4, 2016 Consent Agenda Item: 4N EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Approval of City Disbursements RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to accept for filing City Disbursement Claims for the period of January 23 through March 25, 2016. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council desire to approve City disbursements in accordance with Section 6.11 – Disbursements – How Made, of the City’s Charter? SUMMARY: The Accounting Division prepares this report on a monthly basis for the City Council to review and approve. The attached reports show both City disbursements paid by physical check and those by wire transfer or Automated Clearing House (ACH) when applicable. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Review and approval of the information follows the City’s Charter and provides another layer of oversight to further ensure fiscal stewardship. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: City Disbursements Prepared by: Connie Neubeck, Account Clerk Reviewed by: Steven Heintz, Interim Controller 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 1Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 305.00A TOUCH OF MAGIC INC PERFORMING ARTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 305.00 109.98A-1 OUTDOOR POWER INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 188.50SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 49.41PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 920.24TREE MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 1,268.13 110.16ABERNATHY, LISA ORGANIZED REC G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 110.16 328.40ABRA MN ST LOUIS PARK UNINSURED LOSS G&A UNINSURED LOSS 328.40 225.00ACACIA ARCHITECTS LLC MOVE-UP PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 225.00 143.40ACME TOOLS DAMAGE REPAIR OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 143.40 3,160.00ACOUSTICS ASSOCIATES INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 3,160.00 11,362.50ACROSS THE STREET PRODUCTIONS OPERATIONS TRAINING 11,362.50 911.69ACTION FLEET INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 911.69 962.25ACTIVE 911 INC OPERATIONS RADIO COMMUNICATIONS 962.25 123,128.39ADVANCED DISPOSAL SERVICES SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS YARD WASTE SERVICE 5,538.52SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL YARD WASTE SERVICE 128,666.91 259.60ADVANCED FIRST AID INC REC CENTER BUILDING OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 259.60 2,995.00ADVANTAGE SIGNS & GRAPHICS INC SOLID WASTE G&A OTHER City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 2 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 2Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 2,995.00 255.00AIM ELECTRONICS PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 255.00 21.78AIRITAM, AHMAN WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 21.78 18.99AKARE COMPANIES LLC WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 18.99 235.05ALDRICH, STACY GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 235.05 7,500.00ALEXANDER, ERIC ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 7,500.00 232.75ALL AMERICAN TITLE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 232.75 6,835.50ALLIANCE MECH SRVCS INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 2,150.00MUNICIPAL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 8,985.50 3,000.00ALPHA INVESTMENT GROUP LLC ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 3,000.00 11,775.00AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING INC STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 11,775.00 207.83AMERICAN STATE EQUIPMENT CO GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 207.83 846.32AMERICAN TIRE DISTRIBUTORS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 846.32 317.00ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS OPERATIONS RADIO COMMUNICATIONS 350.00TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 667.00 537.33ANCONA TITLE & ESCROW WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 3 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 3Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 537.33 1,095.00ANDERBERG INNOVATIVE PRINT SOLUTIONS COMM & MARKETING G & A PRINTING & PUBLISHING 2,050.00WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 3,145.00 4,589.00ANDERSEN INC, EARL INSTALLATION OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 446.27SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 5,035.27 308.96ANDERSEN, JENS OPERATIONS TRAINING 308.96 1,775.00ANDERSEN, NORMAN PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,775.00 565.00ANTHONY INC INSPECTIONS G & A 1&2 SINGLE FAM. RENTAL 565.00 430.00APAADMINISTRATION G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 430.00 1,196.19APACHE GROUP OF MINNESOTA REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,196.19 3,134.95APPLE INC TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 3,134.95 340.00APPRAISAL INSTITUTE ASSESSING G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 340.00 4,688.53AQUA LOGIC INC PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 4,688.53 1,500.00AQUILA PROPERTIES LLC ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 1,500.00 1,485.10ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES FACILITIES MCTE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 238.39TEENGENERAL SUPPLIES 1,723.49 City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 4 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 4Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 948.19ARCIT G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 948.19 4,788.00ARCHIVE SOCIAL INC COMM & MARKETING G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,788.00 487.50ARMSTRONG, PAT GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 487.50 1,905.90ARVIG CONSTRUCTION INC TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 1,905.90 1,429.05ASET SUPPLY AND PAPER INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SUPPLY 1,429.05 9,186.03ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 9,186.03 12,862.38ASPEN MILLS OPERATIONS UNIFORMS 161.33OPERATIONSPROTECTIVE CLOTHING 64.94OPERATIONSEMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 13,088.65 339.68AT&T MOBILITY CELLPHONES, IPADS, ETC.OFFICE EQUIPMENT 339.68 1,911.44ATIR ELECTRIC CORPORATION FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 17,781.12MUNICIPAL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 19,692.56 1,000.00ATOMPOLICE G & A TRAINING 1,000.00 91.07ATOMIC RECYCLING FACILITIES MCTE G & A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 91.06PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 91.06SEWER UTILITY G&A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 91.06VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 364.25 245.00AUTO ELECTRIC OF BLOOMINGTON INC GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 245.00 City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 5 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 5Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 52.91AUTO PLUS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 52.91 3,352.45AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 3,352.45 81.95AUTOMOBILE SERVICE GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 81.95 191.00AWWAPUBLIC WORKS G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 191.00 1,326.85BABU, NADINE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 1,326.85 51.00BAKKER, KYLE INSPECTIONS G & A MECHANICAL 51.00 367.34BALVIN, AARON POLICE G & A TRAVEL/MEETINGS 367.34 17.39BANGASSER, PETER WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 17.39 372.23BARKER, BOB COMPANY POLICE G & A SUBSISTENCE SUPPLIES 372.23 750.00BARNA, GUZY & STEFFEN LTD HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 750.00 615.97BARNUM GATE SERVICES INC PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 615.97 3,428.50BARR ENGINEERING CO STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,428.50 22.45BATTERIES + BULBS SANDING/SALTING EQUIPMENT PARTS 167.12WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 1.99PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 191.56 City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 6 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 6Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 250.00BAYAZIT, YILMAZ GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 250.00 75.00BEALKE INDUSTRIES, ROBERT HOLIDAY PROGRAMS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 75.00 186,506.00BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 150.65ARENA MAINTENANCE OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 186,656.65 4,268.98BEDFORD TECHNOLOGY LLC PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 4,268.98 2,410.00BERGERSON CASWELL INC REILLY BUDGET EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 4,450.60REILLY BUDGET OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 6,860.60 487.50BERGLAND, ERIC GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 487.50 296.08BERUBE, BRIAN EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A TUITION 296.08 5,000.00BG CONSULTING INC HUMAN RESOURCES ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT 125.00ORGANIZED REC G & A TRAINING 5,125.00 1,138.00BINDER LIFT LLC OPERATIONS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 1,138.00 43,392.00BLACKWELLPARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 43,392.00 7,785.41BLOOMINGTON, CITY OF REILLY BUDGET OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 7,785.41 3,600.00BLUE CARD-HENNEPIN CTY FIRE CHIEFS ASSN OPERATIONS TRAINING 3,600.00 45.80BNC NATIONAL BANK POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 7 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 7Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 45.80 25.00BOHN WELDING INC ARENA MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 25.00 26,044.00BOLTON & MENK INC STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 28,864.50STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 54,908.50 450.00BOND TRUST SERVICES CORP 2010A GO HIA DEBT SERV G&A FISCAL AGENT FEES 100.002012A GO HIA DEBT SERV G&A FISCAL AGENT FEES 139.502010B GO REF (03) DEBT SER G&A FISCAL AGENT FEES 130.002010B UTIL REV BONDS FISCAL AGENT FEES 373.502013A UTIL REV BONDS FISCAL AGENT FEES 19.002010B UTIL REV BONDS FISCAL AGENT FEES 42.252010B UTIL REV BONDS FISCAL AGENT FEES 76.502013A UTIL REV BONDS FISCAL AGENT FEES 119.25REV BONDS 2001B / 2010B REF FISCAL AGENT FEES 1,450.00 155.77BOUND TREE MEDICAL, LLC POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 576.96OPERATIONSOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 732.73 467.91BOYER TRUCK PARTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 467.91 9,063.90BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 9,063.90 6,000.00BRECOUNT, JOHN ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 6,000.00 210.00BROADWAY AWARDS OPERATIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES 210.00 118.42BROOKSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING REHAB BALANCE SHEET CONTRACTS PAYABLE 118.42 100.00BROWNDALE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION HOUSING REHAB BALANCE SHEET CONTRACTS PAYABLE 100.00 City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 8 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 8Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 3,243.18BULLARD, NATHANIEL SPEC ASSMT CONSTRUCTION OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,243.18 76.96BURNET TITLE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 76.96 180.00C&E AUTO UPHOLSTERY GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 180.00 223.58CADWELL, MARK WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 223.58 741.00CALHOUN TOWERS APTS OPERATIONS RADIO COMMUNICATIONS 741.00 59.60CAL-TEX INSPECTIONS G & A ELECTRICAL 59.60 33,882.45CAMPBELL KNUTSON PROF ASSOC ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL SERVICES 99.00ENGINEERING G & A LEGAL SERVICES 1,221.00CABLE TV G & A LEGAL SERVICES 49.50HOUSING REHAB G & A LEGAL SERVICES 1,419.00PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 232.75SIDEWALKS & TRAILS G & A LEGAL SERVICES 12,519.93STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A LEGAL SERVICES 211.25RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 610.50WATER UTILITY G&A LEGAL SERVICES 231.00SOLID WASTE G&A LEGAL SERVICES 50,476.38 145.83CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY WATER UTILITY G&A LICENSES 145.83 2,049.31CANVASWORKS INC VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 2,049.31 55.97CAPITAL ONE COMMERCIAL WESTWOOD G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 11.49WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 67.46 City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 9 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 9Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 447.69CBIZ FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS INC EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 447.69 3,466.22CDW GOVERNMENT INC TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 822.55MUNICIPAL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 4,288.77 2,681.88CENTER ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT DISCOUNT LOAN PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,856.25MOVE-UP PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 35,907.75TRANSFORMATION LOAN OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 40,445.88 300.00CENTER FOR SOCIAL INCLUSION INC HEALTH IN THE PARK INITIATIVE SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 300.00 10,721.81CENTERPOINT ENERGY FACILITY OPERATIONS HEATING GAS 11,179.17WATER UTILITY G&A HEATING GAS 617.70REILLY G & A HEATING GAS 317.99SEWER UTILITY G&A ELECTRIC SERVICE 424.63SEWER UTILITY G&A HEATING GAS 2,152.60PARK MAINTENANCE G & A HEATING GAS 294.26WESTWOOD G & A HEATING GAS 400.54NATURALIST PROGRAMMER HEATING GAS 26,108.70 17,623.67CENTERPOINT ENERGY SERVICES INC FACILITY OPERATIONS HEATING GAS 17,361.32REC CENTER BUILDING HEATING GAS 34,984.99 20,860.00CENTRAL PENSION FUND EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S OTHER RETIREMENT 20,860.00 24,444.33CENTURY LINK GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET PREPAID EXPENSES 8,889.00E-911 PROGRAM EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 784.80CELLPHONES, IPADS, ETC.TELEPHONE 34,118.13 160.00CHET'S SHOES INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 391.49INSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 200.00PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 1,328.49WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 10 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 10Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 683.00PARK MAINTENANCE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 200.00VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 2,962.98 632.79CINTAS CORPORATION FACILITIES MCTE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 253.37FACILITIES MCTE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,718.68WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 987.08VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 5,591.92 223.09CITIZENS INDEPENDENT BANK GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 167.22GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET CLEARING ACCOUNT 86.24ADMINISTRATION G & A POSTAGE 220.00ADMINISTRATION G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 920.79ADMINISTRATION G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 975.52ADMINISTRATION G & A MEETING EXPENSE 31.36HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL SUPPLIES 562.16HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 400.00HUMAN RESOURCES RECOGNITION 233.83HUMAN RESOURCES CITE 269.00HUMAN RESOURCES SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 299.00HUMAN RESOURCES TRAINING 39.43HUMAN RESOURCES MEETING EXPENSE 532.00HEALTH IN THE PARK INITIATIVE SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 1,589.57HEALTH IN THE PARK INITIATIVE TRAVEL/MEETINGS 317.87COMM & MARKETING G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 500.00COMM & MARKETING G & A ADVERTISING 190.00COMM & MARKETING G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 199.00COMM & MARKETING G & A TRAINING 385.14COMM & MARKETING G & A TRAVEL/MEETINGS 72.45IT G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 231.17IT G & A OFFICE EQUIPMENT 15.04IT G & A POSTAGE 159.77IT G & A TRAINING 403.26ASSESSING G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 361.00ASSESSING G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 478.00ASSESSING G & A TRAINING 16.86FINANCE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 760.00FINANCE G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 48.76FINANCE G & A MEETING EXPENSE 470.00COMM DEV PLANNING G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 11 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 11Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 80.00COMM DEV PLANNING G & A TRAINING 7.72COMM DEV PLANNING G & A BANK CHARGES/CREDIT CD FEES 1,396.94FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 584.10FACILITIES MCTE G & A OFFICE EQUIPMENT 594.99FACILITIES MCTE G & A OTHER 278.00FACILITIES MCTE G & A TRAINING 51.88POLICE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 199.45POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 146.20POLICE G & A BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 675.00POLICE G & A POLICE EQUIPMENT 192.43POLICE G & A POSTAGE 8.91POLICE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 1,913.00POLICE G & A TRAINING 332.36POLICE G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 1,210.56POLICE G & A TRAVEL/MEETINGS 89.87DARE PROGRAM OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 20.36SUPPORT SERVICES POLICE EQUIPMENT 33.90ERUOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 230.55ANIMAL CONTROL POLICE EQUIPMENT 1,468.99JOINT COMM POLICE PARTNERSHIP OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 532.45JOINT COMM POLICE PARTNERSHIP TRAINING 190.00E-911 PROGRAM OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 2,614.35E-911 PROGRAM OTHER 57.34OPERATIONSOFFICE SUPPLIES 220.54OPERATIONSGENERAL SUPPLIES 33.00OPERATIONSFIRE PREVENTION SUPPLIES 1,757.06OPERATIONSOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 342.81OPERATIONSSMALL TOOLS 145.05OPERATIONSUNIFORMS 325.06OPERATIONSPROTECTIVE CLOTHING 12.98OPERATIONSREPAIRS 759.00OPERATIONSSUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 407.89OPERATIONSTRAINING 2,643.40OPERATIONSSEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 144.65OPERATIONSEMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 671.51INSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 564.77INSPECTIONS G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 1,280.00INSPECTIONS G & A TRAINING 427.30ENGINEERING G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 305.00ENGINEERING G & A TRAINING 878.73ENGINEERING G & A TRAVEL/MEETINGS City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 12 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 12Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 16.00ENGINEERING G & A MEETING EXPENSE 1.22ENGINEERING G & A BANK CHARGES/CREDIT CD FEES 179.99PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 8.89PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A EQUIPMENT PARTS 390.00PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A TRAINING 65.06PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A MEETING EXPENSE 25.00TRAININGTRAINING 929.00FRANCHISE ADMINISTRATION SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 550.00FRANCHISE ADMINISTRATION SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 258.65TV PRODUCTION GENERAL SUPPLIES 54.41TV PRODUCTION NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 90.12TV PRODUCTION REPAIRS 100.00HOUSING REHAB G & A TRAINING 658.25WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 215.00WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 730.42WATER UTILITY G&A TRAINING 650.39SEWER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 9.99SEWER UTILITY G&A OFFICE EQUIPMENT 195.00SEWER UTILITY G&A TRAINING 280.48SOLID WASTE G&A PRINTING & PUBLISHING 110.00SOLID WASTE G&A TRAINING 70.03ENVIRONMENT & SUSTAINABILITY GENERAL SUPPLIES 200.00ENVIRONMENT & SUSTAINABILITY TRAINING 6.00ENVIRONMENT & SUSTAINABILITY MEETING EXPENSE 1,107.83TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 433.93MUNICIPAL BLDG OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 58.49MUNICIPAL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 175.00ORGANIZED REC G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 65.00ORGANIZED REC G & A TRAINING 1,020.37ADULT PROGRAMS GENERAL SUPPLIES 416.61HOLIDAY PROGRAMS GENERAL SUPPLIES 350.00HOLIDAY PROGRAMS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 35.00TENNISSUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 37.26WARMING HOUSES GENERAL SUPPLIES 29.94PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 375.27PARK MAINTENANCE G & A TRAINING 868.11PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 152.00PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 269.95NATURAL RESOURCES G & A LANDSCAPING MATERIALS 218.00NATURAL RESOURCES G & A TRAINING 209.96TREE MAINTENANCE LANDSCAPING MATERIALS City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 13 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 13Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 920.28WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 206.72WESTWOOD G & A TRAINING 38.67REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES 164.46REC CENTER BUILDING MEETING EXPENSE 20.00REC CENTER BUILDING LICENSES 3.94ICE RENTAL POSTAGE 193.70CONCESSIONSCONCESSION SUPPLIES 94.13VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 512.38VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A TRAINING 48,756.53 686.27CLAREY'S SAFETY EQUIPMENT INC OPERATIONS SMALL TOOLS 686.27 32.78CLARKE, GEOFF REC CENTER BUILDING OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 32.78 1,632.48CLEAN HARBORS ENV SERVICES INC REILLY BUDGET CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 1,632.48 100.00CLIFTON LARSON ALLEN LLP FINANCE G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 100.00 314.28CODE 4 SERVICES GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 314.28 38,658.00COLICH & ASSOCIATES ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL SERVICES 38,658.00 1,463.30COLLINS ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTION CO ROUTINE MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 1,145.28DAMAGE REPAIR OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,710.89SYSTEM REPAIR OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6,319.47 126.50COMCASTOPERATIONSEMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 36.26OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 669.45WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 13.59REC CENTER BUILDING OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 13.59REC CENTER BUILDING EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 859.39 City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 14 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 14Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 744.40COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 744.40 6,267.50COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP SUB HENN EMERGENCY REPAIR GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6,267.50 158.00COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT FUND MOVE-UP PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 158.00 65,617.64COMPASS MINERALS AMERICA SANDING/SALTING OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 65,617.64 7,698.92CONTINENTAL CASUALTY CO EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S LONG TERM CARE INSUR 7,698.92 387.91CONTINENTAL RESEARCH CORP REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES 441.67REC CENTER BUILDING OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 829.58 118.83CONVERGENT OUTSOURCING INC PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE 118.83 8,750.00CORNERSTONE ADVOCACY SERVICE POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 8,750.00 12,192.52CORPORATE MECHANICAL UNINSURED LOSS G&A UNINSURED LOSS 1,873.72REC CENTER BUILDING OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 1,526.89REC CENTER BUILDING BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 15,593.13 110.00COSTCO WHOLESALE MEMBERSHIP ORGANIZED REC G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 110.00WESTWOOD G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 220.00 20,212.00COVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 20,212.00 208.25CREEKSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 208.25 76.40CROWN MARKING INC COMM & MARKETING G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 15 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 15Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 76.40 576.39CUB FOODS POLICE G & A SUBSISTENCE SUPPLIES 576.39 812.44CUMMINS NPOWER LLC FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 465.00REC CENTER BUILDING EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 1,277.44 28.62CURRAN-MOORE, KIM OPERATIONS EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 28.62 343.70CUSTOM HOSE TECH INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 343.70 35.55CUSTOM RUBBER STAMP CO ADMINISTRATION G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 35.55 12,610.09DALCO ENTERPRISES INC GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SUPPLY 30.78REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES 12,640.87 200.00DAVIS, ROBERT WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 200.00 347.00DAYS PLUMBING SERVICE WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 347.00 3,233.00DC MANAGEMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SRVCS INCFACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 3,233.00 720.00DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES ARENA MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 720.00 7,071.98DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A LICENSES 7,071.98 12,848.20DEPT LABOR & INDUSTRY INSPECTIONS G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 12,848.20 300.00DEX MEDIA EAST LLC ENTERPRISE G & A ADVERTISING City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 16 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 16Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 300.00 200.00DEYOUNG, TERESA LIFEGUARDING TRAINING 200.00 280.51DISCOUNT STEEL INC PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 130.93TREE MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 54.36GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES 465.80 41,378.00DJ ELECTRIC SERVICES INC PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 844.56PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 661.52PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 549.93REC CENTER BUILDING OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 43,434.01 4,708.67DO-GOOD.BIZ INC COMM & MARKETING G & A POSTAGE 2,264.46NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH POSTAGE 6,973.13 250.00DONGOSKI, WILLIAM GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 250.00 292.50DORGLASS INC INSPECTIONS G & A BUILDING 292.50 1,257.66ECM PUBLISHERS INC ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL NOTICES 195.48PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT LEGAL NOTICES 428.25STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A LEGAL NOTICES 1,881.39 80.00EDINA REALTY WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 80.00 116.15EDINA REALTY RELOCATION WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 116.15 400.33EDINA REALTY TITLE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 400.33 2,325.25EGAN COMPANIES INC WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 17 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 17Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 3,126.50WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 971.25SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 6,423.00 456.00EGELAND EMBROIDERY OPERATIONS EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 456.00 1,875.00EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC ESCROWS OPPIDAN - BALLY'S SITE 312.50ESCROWSENCORE (BADER DEV/ASAP) 3,000.002010D FIRE STAT DEBT SERV G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,187.50 200.00ELECTRIC PUMP INC PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 200.00 183.38ELIOT VIEW NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN HOUSING REHAB BALANCE SHEET CONTRACTS PAYABLE 183.38 22.59EMERGENCY APPARATUS MTNCE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 22.59 151.00EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 151.00 411.01EMERGENCY RESPONSE SOLUTIONS OPERATIONS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 411.01 900.00EMPLOYEE STRATEGIES INC ADMINISTRATION G & A TRAINING 900.00 75.00ENCORE BROKERS IT G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 75.00 55.78ENDRUD, KIRSTEN HOUSING REHAB BALANCE SHEET CONTRACTS PAYABLE 55.78 737.00EPIC SECURITY PROFESSIONALS INC PARK MAINTENANCE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 737.00 180.69EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION MANAGEMENT INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 180.69 City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 18 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 18Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 1,280.00ESCAPE FIRE PROTECTION LLC FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 1,280.00 320.00ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC PATCHING-PERMANENT OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 320.00 179.85ESTATE OF BURTON MALINSKY WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 179.85 5,000.00ETHICAL LEADERS IN ACTION LLC OPERATIONS GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5,000.00 174.24EVIDENT INC POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 174.24 1,823.88FACTORY MOTOR PARTS CO GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 162.26VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,986.14 217.00FAIRMONT FIRE SYSTEMS INC REC CENTER BUILDING OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 217.00 9,435.00FARBER SOUND INC TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT 9,435.00 569.39FASTENAL COMPANY OPERATIONS SMALL TOOLS 261.40OPERATIONSPROTECTIVE CLOTHING 8.88SANDING/SALTING EQUIPMENT PARTS 747.00INSTALLATIONOTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 60.81PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 263.51PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 10.42PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 21.77VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,943.18 111.94FEDEXHUMAN RESOURCES RECRUITMENT 111.94 46.40FEINBERG, GREG FAMILY PROGRAMS GENERAL SUPPLIES 46.40 City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 19 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 19Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 5,144.78-FERGUSON WATERWORKS WATER UTILITY BALANCE SHEET RETAINED PERCENTAGE 437,516.23WATER UTILITY G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 432,371.45 889.71FERRELLGASREC CENTER BUILDING MOTOR FUELS 889.71 200.00FINN, PATRICK WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 200.00 545.00FIRE SAFETY USA INC OPERATIONS SMALL TOOLS 1,797.50OPERATIONSPROTECTIVE CLOTHING 4,323.48GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 6,665.98 814.00FIRST ADVANTAGE LNS SCREENING SOLUTIONS HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 814.00 1,639.00FISCHER MINING LLC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 3,000.00WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 4,639.00 1,620.00FISCHLER & ASSOCIATES PA HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 545.00HUMAN RESOURCES RECRUITMENT 1,110.00POLICE G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,090.00COMMUNICATIONS/GV REIMBURSEABL GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,365.00 200.00FLEX COMPENSATION INC EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 200.00 89.50FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY INSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 89.50WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 176.00REC CENTER BUILDING OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 355.00 487.50FOLEY, GERALD GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 487.50 482.60FORCE AMERICA INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 20 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 20Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 46.00SANDING/SALTING EQUIPMENT PARTS 528.60 834.37FORKLIFTS OF MN INC.GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 450.70GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 1,285.07 4.75FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 2.99ROUTINE MAINTENANCE SMALL TOOLS 25.52PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 8.40GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES 41.66 99.70FREEDMAN, BREANNA HUMAN RIGHTS MEETING EXPENSE 99.70 29.74FREEMAN, BRUCE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 29.74 250.00FREEMAN, ZACHARY & JESSICA GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 250.00 10,000.00FRIENDS OF THE ARTS NEIGHBORHOOD PUBLIC ART OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 10,000.00 218.74FUCHS, MARGARET GORBATENKO & PAUL WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 218.74 719.00FUN2RAISE MARKETING AND EVENTS AQUATIC PARK BUDGET ADVERTISING 719.00 214.52G & K SERVICES REC CENTER BUILDING OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 214.52 273.20G S DIRECT ENGINEERING G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 273.20 300.00GARDEN & ASSOCIATES INC POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 300.00 4,726.91GARTNER REFRIG & MFG INC UNINSURED LOSS G&A UNINSURED LOSS City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 21 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 21Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 5,200.97ARENA MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 9,927.88 250.00GERLACH, JOHN GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 250.00 3,936.27GLTC PREMIUM PAYMENTS EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S LONG TERM CARE INSUR 3,936.27 6,105.09GOLDEN VALLEY, CITY OF INSPECTIONS G & A BUILDING 6,105.09 1,960.00GOODPOINTE TECHNOLOGY INC PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,960.00 566.95GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 566.95 390.85GOTHBERG, BRIDGET ENGINEERING G & A TRAINING 390.85 91.50GRAFIX SHOPPE UNINSURED LOSS G&A UNINSURED LOSS 91.50 178.42GRAINGER INC, WW GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 556.79GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 3,121.50PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 454.32VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 77.84GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES 4,388.87 1,514.00GRANITE LEDGE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS DAMAGE REPAIR OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,514.00 3,000.00GREAT RIVER GREENING PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 3,000.00 6,066.00GREEN, DAVID RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 6,066.00 140.00GREGG, RACHEL WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 22 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 22Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 140.00 356.92GRONSKI, PAM POLICE G & A TRAVEL/MEETINGS 356.92 2,800.00GROTH SEWER & WATER SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 2,800.00 945.84GROUP HEALTH INC - WORKSITE EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A HEALTH INSURANCE 945.84 450.00GUNSTAD, MARK GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 450.00 262.50HAGEENEIER, SCOTT GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 262.50 215.64HALAMA, BENJAMIN WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 215.64 600.00HALL, JAY SEWER UTILITY G&A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 600.00 1,575.00HAMILTON, MIKE BROOMBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,575.00 1,000.00HAMMER, MARTIN ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 1,000.00 1,462.50HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON INC STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,462.50 227.34HANSEN, EVA OPERATIONS SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 227.34 3,000.00HANSON, JOSH ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 3,000.00 552.71HAVLIK, MATTHEW POLICE G & A TRAVEL/MEETINGS 552.71 City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 23 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 23Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 7,580.98HAWKINS INC WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 7,580.98 1,458.00HEALTHPARTNERSHUMAN RESOURCES RECRUITMENT 1,458.00 10.00HEARTH & HOME TECHNOLOGIES INSPECTIONS G & A MECHANICAL 10.00 330.00HECKLER & KOCH DEFENSE INC POLICE G & A POLICE EQUIPMENT 330.00 329.92HEDBERG SUPPLY WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 329.92 418.64HEINTZ, STEVEN FINANCE G & A TRAVEL/MEETINGS 418.64 543.20HEISER, DEBRA HEALTH IN THE PARK INITIATIVE TRAVEL/MEETINGS 383.20ENGINEERING G & A TRAVEL/MEETINGS 30.00ENGINEERING G & A MEETING EXPENSE 956.40 51.00HEITHECKER, ERIC INSPECTIONS G & A PLUMBING 51.00 494.26HEMANN, COTY FINANCE G & A TRAVEL/MEETINGS 494.26 39.77HENDERSON, MATTHEW WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 39.77 160.00HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER OPERATIONS TRAINING 160.00 119.00HENNEPIN COUNTY RESIDENT & REAL ESTATE ASSESSING G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 119.00 1,100.00HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER IT G & A COMPUTER SERVICES 231.00GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,645.00POLICE G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 24 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 24Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 8,427.73POLICE G & A SUBSISTENCE SERVICE 3,362.98OPERATIONSRADIO COMMUNICATIONS 3,002.13WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,002.13SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,002.13STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 9,006.41PARK MAINTENANCE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 203.23PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE 58.00REC CENTER BUILDING LICENSES 347.00VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 36,387.74 1,057.94HENRICKSEN PSG FACILITIES MCTE G & A OTHER 106,840.98MUNICIPAL BLDG OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,760.98MUNICIPAL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 111,659.90 141.85HENRY, CATHERINE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 141.85 2,500.00HERNANDEZ, MONICA ESCROWS DEMO / BROOKSIDE TRAFFIC 2,500.00 808.34HIRSHFIELDSWATER UTILITY G&A BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 808.34 2,482.50HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP INC GENERAL INFORMATION GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,482.50 1,200.54HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES FACILITIES MCTE G & A BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 14.40POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 149.95ERUOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 4.27PUBLIC WORKS G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 13.62ROUTINE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT PARTS 11.68SNOW PLOWING EQUIPMENT PARTS 39.25SANDING/SALTING EQUIPMENT PARTS 180.91DAMAGE REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES 45.93DAMAGE REPAIR SMALL TOOLS 80.92DAMAGE REPAIR OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 1,655.79WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 197.00SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 32.97SOLID WASTE G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 25 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 25Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 137.41PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 83.43PARK MAINTENANCE G & A SMALL TOOLS 59.91PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 86.54PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 82.23PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 130.01PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 88.66BRICK HOUSE (1324)GENERAL SUPPLIES 169.94TREE MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 249.04REC CENTER BUILDING OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 4,714.40 8.98HOME DEPOT CREDIT SRVCS WW RENTAL HOUSE (1322)OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 3,536.96WESTWOOD G & A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 3,545.94 12.34HOME TITLE INC WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 12.34 70.24HONDA TOWN GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 70.24 270.27HOPKINS, CITY OF PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE 270.27 5,000.00HORICK, JON ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 5,000.00 314.18HOTSY OF MN PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SUPPLY 314.18 1,185.00HOWES, JEFFREY VOLLEYBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,185.00 650.00HSEMWATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 650.00 387.50HUSTLE UP LLC BROOMBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 387.50 2,837.30I.U.O.E. LOCAL NO 49 EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S UNION DUES 2,837.30 City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 26 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 26Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 2,393.00I/O SOLUTIONS INC HUMAN RESOURCES RECRUITMENT 2,393.00 450.00IACPPOLICE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 450.00 319.80IAPMOINSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 319.80 38.00IATNVEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 38.00 316.00ICCINSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 546.00INSPECTIONS G & A TRAINING 862.00 3,410.00IDC AUTOMATIC MUNICIPAL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 3,410.00 1,256.71IMPACT PROVEN SOLUTIONS WATER UTILITY G&A POSTAGE 1,256.71SEWER UTILITY G&A POSTAGE 1,256.71SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS POSTAGE 597.54STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,256.72STORM WATER UTILITY G&A POSTAGE 5,624.39 85.00IMSAPUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 85.00 310.61INDELCOSNOW PLOWING EQUIPMENT PARTS 2,744.42SANDING/SALTING EQUIPMENT PARTS 77.80WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 3,132.83 187,400.00INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT #283 SCHOOL DISTRICT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 187,400.00 11,500.00INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE INC GENERAL FUND G&A MISC EXPENSE 11,500.00 City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 27 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 27Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 4,569.53INTEGRA TELECOM IT G & A TELEPHONE 4,569.53 704.09INVER GROVE FORD GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 642.43UNINSURED LOSS G&A UNINSURED LOSS 129.99GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 1,476.51 75.00IPMA-HR MINNESOTA HUMAN RESOURCES SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 75.00 109,646.69I-STATE TRUCK CENTER GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 139.75VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 7,539.19GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 117,325.63 475.20J & F REDDY RENTS REILLY G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 475.20 2,470.00JEFFERSON FIRE & SAFETY INC OPERATIONS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 170.34OPERATIONSSMALL TOOLS 1,924.76OPERATIONSPROTECTIVE CLOTHING 2,625.00TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 7,190.10 12.35JELLE, RUSSELL WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 12.35 117.80JENSEN, VALERIE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 117.80 3.58JERRY'S HARDWARE POLICE G & A BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 15.26ROUTINE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT PARTS 163.88WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT PARTS 57.10PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 58.05VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 297.87 23.67JHUNG, CAROLE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 23.67 City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 28 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 28Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 250.00JOHNSON, LAUREN GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 250.00 230.00JOHNSON, ZACK INSPECTIONS G & A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE 230.00 92.10JONES & BARTLETT LEARNING OPERATIONS TRAINING 92.10 57.20JOSH'S PRO PLUMBING INSPECTIONS G & A PLUMBING 57.20 86.63JRK SEED & SURG SUPPLY INVASIVE PLANT MGMT/RESTORATIO OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 86.63 32.13KAMPA, MARK POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 32.13 487.50KANE, PATRICIA GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 487.50 53.47KATZ, ARTHUR WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 53.47 1,006.16KELLER, JASMINE Z EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S WAGE GARNISHMENTS 1,006.16 5,949.65KENNEDY & GRAVEN ESCROWS OPPIDAN - BALLY'S SITE 210.00ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL SERVICES 129.50GREENSBORO HIA LEGAL SERVICES 187.00STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 396.00WEST END TIF DIST G&A LEGAL SERVICES 1,447.23DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A LEGAL SERVICES 126.00PARK COMMONS G&A LEGAL SERVICES 1,125.00HARD COAT G & A LEGAL SERVICES 9,570.38 276.00KIDCREATE STUDIO PRE-SCHOOL PROGRAMS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 250.00LITTLE TOT PLAYTIME GENERAL SUPPLIES 125.00LITTLE TOT PLAYTIME OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 651.00 City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 29 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 29Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 67.59KIMBREL, KEVIN WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 67.59 725.00KING, RYAN BROOMBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 725.00 63.00KIVEL, PHILIP OPERATIONS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 63.00 1,980.00KLM ENGINEERING INC.WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 1,980.00 112.58KOELSCH, RENE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 112.58 298.75KRISS PREMIUM PRODUCTS INC REC CENTER BUILDING OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 298.75 515.00KROOG, RACHAEL NATURAL RESOURCES G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 515.00 757.46KRUELLE, BRYAN EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A TUITION 757.46 270.52KRUGE-AIR INC BLDG/GROUNDS OPS & MAINT BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 270.52 110.00KUECHLE, SUNDEE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 110.00 85.70KUMAR, HARI SPEC ASSMT CONSTRUCTION OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 85.70 1,500.00LABATT, NATE ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 1,500.00 50.00LARSON, JACQUELINE COMM & MARKETING G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 50.00 564.38LARSON, JH CO FACILITIES MCTE G & A BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 30 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 30Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 1,811.93SYSTEM REPAIR OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 2,376.31 558.00LASER TECHNOLOGY INC POLICE G & A REPAIRS 558.00 222.73LAVELLE, NATHANIEL WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 222.73 5,551.20LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES INC EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S UNION DUES 5,551.20 49.08LAW ENFORCEMENT TARGETS INC ERU OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 49.08 194.39LAWSON PRODUCTS INC FINANCE BUDGET GENERAL SUPPLIES 194.39 30.00LEAGUE OF MN CITIES ADMINISTRATION G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 90.00ADMINISTRATION G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 4,385.00POLICE G & A TRAINING 20.00TRAININGSEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 1,240.00STORM WATER UTILITY G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 5,765.00 485.20LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INSURANCE TRUST RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 116,498.00EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A League of MN Cities dept'l exp 113,910.75UNINSURED LOSS B/S PREPAID EXPENSES 8,340.75UNINSURED LOSS G&A UNINSURED LOSS 239,234.70 85.00LEAP MANUFACTURING LLC PATCHING-PERMANENT OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 851.70PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,635.40WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 2,572.10 2,650.00LEER COMMUNICATION & CONSULTANTS COMM & MARKETING G & A TRAINING 2,650.00 330.62LEONARD, COLLEEN HOUSING REHAB BALANCE SHEET CONTRACTS PAYABLE 330.62 City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 31 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 31Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 35,400.00LEOTEK ELECTRONICS USA LLC SYSTEM REPAIR OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 35,400.00 1,000.00LEPESKA, PAM ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 1,000.00 487.50LESCH, ANN GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 487.50 299.64LIBERTY ENVELOPE COMM & MARKETING G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 299.64 220.00LIBERTY TITLE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 220.00 35.00LIETZAU, CAITLIN GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 35.00 7,234.74LINAEMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A LONG TERM DISABILITY 7,234.74 481.58LITTLE FALLS MACHINE INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 481.58 87.62LOCKBAUM, PAUL WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 87.62 1,517.00LOCKGUARD INC PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 1,517.00 6,909.85LOCKRIDGE GRINDAL NAUEN PLLP REILLY G & A LEGAL SERVICES 6,909.85 2,821.79LOFFLER COMPANIES IT G & A OFFICE EQUIPMENT 600.54POLICE G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 3,422.33 84,514.55LOGISIT G & A COMPUTER SERVICES 56,965.20TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 141,479.75 City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 32 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 32Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 42.84LOMBARDI, JIM BROOMBALL GENERAL SUPPLIES 42.84 875.00LOTUS PRINT GROUP OPERATIONS SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 875.00 200.00LUBBEN, ALLISON GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 200.00 933.11LUBRICATION TECHNOLOGIES INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 543.09VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 1,476.20 159.20LUND, ERIC WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 159.20 17.82LYNCH, DEBRA ASSESSING G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 17.82 3,223.74MACQUEEN EQUIP CO GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 126.00WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 307.93SEWER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 101.00SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 3,758.67 340.00MACTATV PRODUCTION SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 340.00 1,450.00MADISON, DANIEL BROOMBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,450.00 387.20MALONE, DANIEL SAFETY CAMPS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 387.20 45.00MAMAADMINISTRATION G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 45.00 40,688.15MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 1,226.48REC CENTER BUILDING MOTOR FUELS 41,914.63 City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 33 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 33Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 150.00MAPMOINSPECTIONS G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 150.00 142.25MARTENS, AFTON JOINT COMM POLICE PARTNERSHIP TRAVEL/MEETINGS 53.88JOINT COMM POLICE PARTNERSHIP MEETING EXPENSE 196.13 10,003.20MASTER TECHNOLOGY GROUP TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 10,003.20 15.03MATHESON TRI-GAS INC VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 15.03 442.70MAVITY, ANNE ADMINISTRATION G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 442.70 83,152.00MAYFLOWER PROPERTIES LLC SPEC ASSMT CONSTRUCTION OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 83,152.00 231.50MCCARTHY BUILDERS INC INSPECTIONS G & A BUILDING 231.50 262.50MCCARTHY, JUDITH GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 262.50 650.00MCCHESNEY, CHARLIE BROOMBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 650.00 36.12MCCOY, WILLIAM PETROLEUM FUELS INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 36.12 168.38MCHUGH, JOHN T HUMAN RESOURCES CITE 17.00CABLE TV G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 185.38 225.00MCMONIGAL ARCHITECTS LLC GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 225.00 20.00MCMONIGAL, MEG COMM DEV PLANNING G & A TRAINING 43.74COMM DEV PLANNING G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 34 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 34Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 63.74 45.44MENARDSPOLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 167.88ERUOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 24.47DAMAGE REPAIR SMALL TOOLS 4.99INSTALLATIONOTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 60.13PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 37.43WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 586.90WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 88.88PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 33.50WW RENTAL HOUSE (1322)OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 118.08WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,167.70 103.14MERKLEY, SCOTT PUBLIC WORKS G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 103.14 2,920.51METHODIST HOSPITAL SEWER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 2,920.51 865.00METRO BLOOMS STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 865.00 12,379.00METRO CITIES ADMINISTRATION G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 12,379.00 2,412.00METRO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS VOLLEYBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,412.00 36,902.25METROPOLITAN COUNCIL INSPECTIONS G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 12,271.49REILLY BUDGET CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 696,194.02OPERATIONSCLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 745,367.76 142.00MHAINSPECTIONS G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 142.00 10.53MICKELBURG, AMY WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 10.53 568.82MICRO CENTER WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 35 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 35Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 568.82 3,422.50MID AMERICA BUSINESS SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 3,422.50 6.51MIDLAND TITLE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 6.51 74.75MIDURA, KAY ADMINISTRATION G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 74.75 9.80MIDWEST BADGE & NOVELTY CO COMMUNICATIONS/GV REIMBURSEABL OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 9.80 5,450.56MILLER DUNWIDDIE ARCHITECTURE PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,450.56 55,318.00MILLERBERND MFG CO SYSTEM REPAIR OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 55,318.00 1,057.50MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPT PAWN FEES OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,057.50 55.00MINNEAPOLIS WINDOW SHADE CO FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 55.00 66.00MINNEAPOLIS/ST PAUL PLUMBING & HEATING INSPECTIONS G & A MECHANICAL 66.00 298.14MINNESOTA BENEFIT ASSOC EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S ACCRUED OTHER BENEFITS 298.14 480.00MINNESOTA BUREAU CRIMINAL APPREHENSION POLICE G & A TRAINING 480.00 25.00MINNESOTA CHAPTER OF APA HUMAN RESOURCES RECRUITMENT 25.00 369.15MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PYT CTR EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S WAGE GARNISHMENTS 369.15 City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 36 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 36Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 150.00MINNESOTA DEPT HEALTH STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 21,558.00WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 450.00REILLY BUDGET LICENSES 22,158.00 80.00MINNESOTA FIRE SVC CERT BD OPERATIONS TRAINING 80.00 180.00MINNESOTA GFOA FINANCE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 180.00 1,948.65MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 1,948.65 165.00MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY SEWER UTILITY G&A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 165.00 720.00MINNESOTA STATE FIRE CHIEFS ASSOC. OPERATIONS SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 720.00 135.00MINNESOTA STATE FIRE MARSHAL OPERATIONS TRAINING 135.00 166.55MINNESOTA TRUCKING ASSOC VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A OFFICE SUPPLIES 166.55 318.00MINNESOTA WANNER COMPANY GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 34.03SNOW PLOWING EQUIPMENT PARTS 352.03 150.00MINUTEMAN PRESS COMM & MARKETING G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 150.00 630.00MINVALCO INC WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 630.00 2,244.00MISTER CAR WASH PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 2,244.00 10.00MN DEPT LABOR & INDUSTRY WATER UTILITY G&A LICENSES 10.00 City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 37 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 37Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 21,375.13MN DNR ECO-WATER-RES WATER UTILITY G&A LICENSES 21,375.13 305.00MN HELICOPTERS INC NATURAL RESOURCES G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 305.00 187.84MN MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT INC SWEEPING EQUIPMENT PARTS 187.84 51.00MN PLUMBING & APPLIANCE INSPECTIONS G & A PLUMBING 51.00 2,760.00MN TACTICAL OFFICERS ASSOC ERU TRAINING 2,760.00 175.00MNCCSOLID WASTE G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 175.00 2,500.00MOBIUS INC HEALTH IN THE PARK INITIATIVE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,500.00 37.12MORANTZ, ANDREW WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 37.12 249.20MORRISON, GARY COMM DEV PLANNING G & A TRAINING 249.20 450.11MORTGAGE CONTRACTING SERVICES WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 450.11 685.00MOSS & BARNETT FRANCHISE ADMINISTRATION OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 685.00 3,465.00MOST DEPENDABLE FOUNTAINS IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 3,465.00 3,716.00MOTOROLAGENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 3,716.00 45.00MPCASEWER UTILITY G&A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 38 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 38Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 45.00 140.00MPSTMAPARK MAINTENANCE G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 140.00 179.27MPX GROUP COMM & MARKETING G & A PRINTING & PUBLISHING 413.70WATER UTILITY G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 592.97 1,645.00MRPAORGANIZED REC G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 79.00ORGANIZED REC G & A TRAINING 195.00BASKETBALLSUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 80.00PARK MAINTENANCE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 316.00PARK MAINTENANCE G & A TRAINING 80.00WESTWOOD G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 158.00REC CENTER BUILDING TRAINING 160.00ENTERPRISE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 2,713.00 39.02MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO.GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 39.02 100.00MSSAPUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 100.00 613.14MULFINGER, ANNA WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 613.14 25.00MUNICI-PALS HUMAN RESOURCES TRAINING 25.00 1,128.50MVTL LABORATORIES REILLY BUDGET OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,128.50 31.55NAFFZIGER, TONY WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 31.55 5,317.91NAPA (GENUINE PARTS CO)GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 83.88GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 116.12WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT PARTS 9.98SEWER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 39 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 39Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 20.65PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 16.16PARK MAINTENANCE G & A SMALL TOOLS 13.45VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 901.90GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES 43.97GENERAL REPAIR SMALL TOOLS 6,524.02 40.00NATIONAL ASSOC SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICERSPOLICE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 40.00 758.80ND CHILD SUPPORT DIVISION EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S WAGE GARNISHMENTS 758.80 5,000.00NEOGOVTECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 5,000.00 700.00NEUMANN, NEAL BROOMBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 700.00 1,155.00NOISEADMINISTRATION G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 1,155.00 355.00NOKOMIS SHOE SHOP INSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,800.00PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 594.90WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 1,600.00PARK MAINTENANCE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 800.00REC CENTER SALARIES OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 800.00VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 5,949.90 200.00NORTH STAR CHAPTER APPRAISAL INSTITUTE ASSESSING G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 200.00 4,500.00NORTHEAST TREE INC RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 18,984.38TREE MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 23,484.38 2,944.21NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 2,944.21 191.00NORTHLAND MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 40 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 40Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 2,016.53MUNICIPAL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 2,207.53 4,357.60NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMM & MARKETING G & A POSTAGE 5,450.43COMM & MARKETING G & A PRINTING & PUBLISHING 9,808.03 500.00OAK KNOLL ANIMAL HOSPITAL POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 500.00 75.08OFFICE DEPOT ADMINISTRATION G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 15.37ADMINISTRATION G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 66.58HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICE SUPPLIES 8.99HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,757.48COMM & MARKETING G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 774.25COMM & MARKETING G & A PRINTING & PUBLISHING 381.93FINANCE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 126.82GENERAL INFORMATION OFFICE SUPPLIES 1,015.95GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE OTHER 335.31POLICE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 40.36POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 273.59POLICE G & A COMPUTER SUPPLIES 17.59POLICE G & A OFFICE EQUIPMENT 198.86NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 232.70COMMUNICATIONS/GV REIMBURSEABL OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 170.11OPERATIONSOFFICE SUPPLIES 138.97INSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 312.94PUBLIC WORKS G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 103.33ENGINEERING G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 21.78HOUSING REHAB G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 214.15WATER UTILITY G&A OFFICE SUPPLIES 213.85ORGANIZED REC G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 24.80PARK MAINTENANCE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 199.40VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A OFFICE SUPPLIES 203.58GENERAL REPAIR OFFICE SUPPLIES 6,923.77 117.59OLSON, DON WATER UTILITY G&A TRAINING 78.03WATER UTILITY G&A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 195.62 City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 41 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 41Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 45.60O'REILLY AUTO PARTS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 45.60 40.00OWENS, SCOTT INSPECTIONS G & A 1&2 SINGLE FAM. RENTAL 40.00 481.14OXYGEN SERVICE COMPANY INC OPERATIONS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 481.14 563.50PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES INC REILLY BUDGET OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 563.50 36.47PARAMOUNT INVESTMENT GROUP WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 36.47 174,446.17PARK CONSTRUCTION CO STREET CAPITAL PROJ BAL SHEET RETAINED PERCENTAGE 192,206.85CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 366,653.02 3,000.00-PARK PRO SHOP REC CENTER BUILDING RENT REVENUE 2,701.80SKATE RENTAL PROGRAM REVENUE 918.00SKATE SHARPENING PROGRAM REVENUE 619.80 7.43PARKER, BACH WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 7.43 300.00PARKTACULARSPECIAL EVENTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 8,000.00COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 8,300.00 41,250.00PARSONS ELECTRIC PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 5,392.10TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 46,642.10 279.70PARTSMASTERGENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES 279.70 800.00PARTY UNIT SPECIAL EVENTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 800.00 City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 42 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 42Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 113.20PATRICK, MICHEAL WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 113.20 1,180.00PBBS EQUIPMENT CORP FACILITIES MCTE G & A TRAINING 1,180.00 15.00PELTOLA, MAX GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 404.75POLICE G & A TRAVEL/MEETINGS 419.75 2,497.50PERNSTEINER CREATIVE GROUP INC COMM & MARKETING G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,497.50 30.00PETTY CASH NETWORK SUPPORT SERVICES MEETING EXPENSE 6.74FINANCE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 31.62FINANCE G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR .67FINANCE G & A BANK CHARGES/CREDIT CD FEES 1.62POLICE G & A POSTAGE 7.00POLICE G & A TRAVEL/MEETINGS 19.97POLICE G & A MEETING EXPENSE 22.50INSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 4.00SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS EXTRA REFUSE STICKER REVENUE 124.12 117.97PETTY CASH - WWNC WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 4.86WESTWOOD G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 5.78ADULTSCONCESSION SUPPLIES 128.61 1,885.00PIERCE PHOTOGRAPHY, SARAH COMM & MARKETING G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,885.00 248.25PIONEER RESEARCH CORP SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 248.25 5,047.00PIPE DREAM PLUMBING INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 5,047.00 35.00PLEAAPOLICE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 35.00 City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 43 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 43Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 2,957.94POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 2,957.94 496.53POPP.COM INC PARK MAINTENANCE G & A TELEPHONE 496.53 450.00POSTMASTERCOMM & MARKETING G & A POSTAGE 450.00 704.67POWERPLAN OIB GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 139.95TREE MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 844.62 220.00PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 220.00 419.56PRECISE MRM LLC PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENT 419.58WATER UTILITY G&A MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENT 419.56SEWER UTILITY G&A MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENT 419.57STORM WATER UTILITY G&A MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENT 1,678.27 2,862.00PRECISION LANDSCAPE & TREE TREE DISEASE PUBLIC CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 2,862.00 39.00PREMIUM WATERS INC OPERATIONS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 39.00 340.00PRINTERS SERVICE INC ARENA MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 340.00 200.00PRO AUTO DETAILING GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 200.00 951.00PRO HYDRO-TESTING OPERATIONS TESTING & CALIBRATION 951.00 108.86PRO TITLE OF MN LLC WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 108.86 1,225.41PROFESSIONAL FOOD SERVICE ADMINISTRATION G & A MEETING EXPENSE City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 44 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 44Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 1,225.41 907.50PROGRESSIVE CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC WATER UTILITY G&A ENGINEERING SERVICES 907.50 203.60PUMP & METER SERVICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 755.00PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 431.79GENERAL REPAIR BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 1,390.39 149.10Q3 CONTRACTING WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 228.00STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 377.10 100.00QUALITY HOMES RENEWED WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 100.00 943.75QUARVE-PETERSON INC, JULEE GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,166.25PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,110.00 149.41QUICKSILVER EXPRESS COURIER HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL SUPPLIES 136.40VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A POSTAGE 285.81 597.02RAILROAD MANAGEMENT COMPANY III LLC WATER UTILITY G&A LICENSES 597.02 1,000.00RAMIREZ-ACOSTA, AMBER & ALEJANDRO ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 1,000.00 5,671.92RANDY'S SANITATION INC FACILITY OPERATIONS GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE 3,320.69REC CENTER BUILDING GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE 8,992.61 700.00RAPP LLC, CRAIG ADMINISTRATION G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 700.00 1,200.00RAUCHWARTER, MATTHEW ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 1,200.00 City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 45 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 45Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 551.36RECYCLE CENTER SOLID WASTE G&A OTHER 551.36 184.35RED WING SHOE STORE PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 194.38WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 378.73 820.17REDEXIM TURF PRODUCTS PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 820.17 218.79REGENCY OFFICE PRODUCTS LLC FACILITIES MCTE G & A OTHER 123.53POLICE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 134.33NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 476.65 12,488.00REHRIG PACIFIC CO SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS OTHER 12,488.00 758.40REVOLUTIONARY SPORTS LLC INACTIVE - YOUTH PRGMS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 758.40 10,387.47RICOH USA INC IT G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 10,387.47 77.97RIGID HITCH INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 77.97 1,438.00RIVERDALE MILLS CORP PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 1,438.00 895.00ROBARGE ENTERPRISES INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 895.00WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 1,790.00 2,200.00ROGERS, KYLE BROOMBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,200.00 18.43ROLLINS, NEIL WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 18.43 445.00ROOT-O-MATIC REILLY BUDGET OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 46 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 46Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 445.00 136.50ROSS, LAUREN INSPECTIONS G & A BUILDING 136.50 355.38ROY C INC REC CENTER BUILDING OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 355.38 52,447.52RSP ARCHITECTS LTD PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 46,026.03PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 40,536.10PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 139,009.65 548.57SAFELITE FULFILLMENT INC GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 548.57 75.00SAKAMOTO, JAMES WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 75.00 61.78SAM'S CLUB POLICE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 45.00POLICE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 110.82POLICE G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 35.94OPERATIONSGENERAL SUPPLIES 135.00OPERATIONSSUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 142.70OPERATIONSSEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 135.00PUBLIC WORKS G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 460.00ORGANIZED REC G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 510.98WARMING HOUSES GENERAL SUPPLIES 45.00PARK MAINTENANCE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 232.82WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,915.04 250.00SANGSTER, JENNIFER GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 250.00 2,500.00SAULSBURY, MARIA ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 2,500.00 262.50SAVAGE, WENDY GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 262.50 City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 47 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 47Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 486.00SAVATREETREE DISEASE PRIVATE CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 486.00 409.80SCHAAKE COMPANY, AJ HUMAN RESOURCES RECOGNITION 409.80 2,500.00SCHERBER COMPANIES ESCROWS DEMO / BROOKSIDE TRAFFIC 2,500.00 147.60SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO.PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 151.04PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 298.64 31,480.00SCHMITZ CONSTRUCTION CO LLC, J P WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 2,881.00SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 34,361.00 338.25SCHWAB VOLLHABER LUBRATT SERVICE CORP GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 338.25 244.82SEARLE, HUGO OPERATIONS TRAINING 244.82 205.96SEDGWICK CMS EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A League of MN Cities dept'l exp 205.96 30,451.21SEHSTREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 30,451.21 76.00SENSIBLE LAND USE COALITION COMM DEV PLANNING G & A TRAINING 76.00 104.77SEVERSON, RACHAEL WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 104.77 121,319.00SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 121,319.00 199.70SHRED-IT USA MINNEAPOLIS ADMINISTRATION G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 353.95IT G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 22.47FINANCE G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 48 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 48Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 119.92POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 11.45INSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 11.45WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 11.45ORGANIZED REC G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 730.39 190.00SHRMHUMAN RESOURCES SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 190.00 55.69SIEGEL, WAYNE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 55.69 420.00SIGN PRODUCERS INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 2,675.00MUNICIPAL BLDG OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 740.00MUNICIPAL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 3,835.00 51.52SIGNATURE ELECTRIC CO INSPECTIONS G & A ELECTRICAL 51.52 1,725.00SIGNATURE MECHANICAL INC IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,725.00 200.00SILVERMERE AMERICA LLC FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 200.00 1,087.39SIMPLEXGRINNELL LP FACILITIES MCTE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 394.00REC CENTER BUILDING BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 1,481.39 437.50SINCHEFF, THOMAS & MARY GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 437.50 203.10SKELLY, GABRIEL HOUSING REHAB BALANCE SHEET CONTRACTS PAYABLE 203.10 2,758.20SLP FF ASSOC IAFF LOCAL #993 EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S UNION DUES 2,758.20 625.00SNIPERCRAFTPOLICE G & A TRAINING 625.00 City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 49 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 49Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 150.00SOTAPOLICE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 1,000.00POLICE G & A TRAINING 1,150.00 2,520.00SOURCE WATER SOLUTIONS LLC WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,520.00 850.00SOUTH METRO PUBLIC SAFETY TRAINING FAC POLICE G & A TRAINING 850.00 3,576.77SPRINTIT G & A DATACOMMUNICATIONS 10,004.37CELLPHONES, IPADS, ETC.OFFICE EQUIPMENT 13,581.14 290.37SPS COMPANIES INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 205.28ROUTINE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT PARTS 1,201.87WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 39.96PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 126.66REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES 23.72REC CENTER BUILDING OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 1,887.86 750.00SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC ENGINEERING G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,772.90RIGHT-OF-WAY OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,522.90 977.18ST LOUIS PARK HOUSING AUTHORITY WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 977.18 3,000.00ST LOUIS PARK POLICE EXPLORERS EXPLORERS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 3,000.00 100.00ST LOUIS PARK SUNRISE ROTARY COMM DEV PLANNING G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 100.00 149.00ST PAUL, CITY OF COMM & MARKETING G & A TRAINING 149.00POLICE G & A TRAINING 298.00 40.00STAFFORD HOME SERVICE INSPECTIONS G & A ELECTRICAL City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 50 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 50Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 40.00 194.48STAR TRIBUNE ADMINISTRATION G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 324.48POLICE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 518.96 130.55STEENLAGE, BARAK REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 130.55 2,347.46STEVENS ENGINEERS INC PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 10,612.91PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 12,960.37 170.00STOFEN, MATTHEW WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 170.00 1,423.33STONEBROOKE EQUIPMENT INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 1,423.33 35.00STORFER, LEON GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 35.00 10,556.62STREICHER'S POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 209.95POLICE G & A POLICE EQUIPMENT 515.25ERUOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 1,450.79OPERATIONSUNIFORMS 304.98OPERATIONSPROTECTIVE CLOTHING 199.98SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER 13,237.57 147.50STROKE INSPIRE PROGRAM PICNIC SHELTERS RENT REVENUE 147.50 40.00SUBURBAN ELECTRIC INSPECTIONS G & A ELECTRICAL 40.00 2,748.20SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 2,748.20 1,007.80SUMMIT ENVIROSOLUTIONS INC STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 28,050.40REILLY BUDGET GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 51 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 51Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 29,058.20 673.00SUN CONTROL OF MINNESOTA INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 673.00 21.28SUNDBERG AMERICA GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 21.28 400.00SUSAWATER UTILITY G&A TRAINING 400.00 1,000.00SVENKESON, KRISTI ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 1,000.00 14,800.00SWAN COMPANIES PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 14,800.00 8,866.00SWANSON & YOUNGDALE INC MUNICIPAL BLDG OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES MUNICIPAL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 8,866.00 5,922.50TARGETSOLUTIONS LEARNING OPERATIONS TRAINING 5,922.50 834.10TASER INTERNATIONAL POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 9,404.58POLICE G & A POLICE EQUIPMENT 10,238.68 105.78TELELANGUAGE INC ADMINISTRATION G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 105.78 21.35TENNANT SALES AND SERVICE CO.GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 274.96REC CENTER BUILDING EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 591.84GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 888.15 401.19TERMINAL SUPPLY CO GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES 401.19 1,317.84TERMINIX INT GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 74.50BRICK HOUSE (1324)BUILDING MTCE SERVICE City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 52 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 52Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 74.50WW RENTAL HOUSE (1322)BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 225.28REC CENTER BUILDING BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 1,692.12 200.00TESSMAN, ERIC INSPECTIONS G & A LICENSES 200.00 30.00TEXA TONKA TAILORING OPERATIONS GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 30.00 700.00THIES, KEN OR MARY SPECIAL EVENTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 700.00 340.04THOMSON REUTERS WEST PAYMENT CENTER POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 340.04 1,000.00TIGER OAK PUBLICATIONS COMM & MARKETING G & A ADVERTISING 700.00ORGANIZED REC G & A ADVERTISING 700.00AQUATIC PARK BUDGET ADVERTISING 2,400.00 2,565.00TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL ADMINISTRATION G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,565.00 33.96TITLE CHOICE LLC WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 33.96 4,099.53TKDAWATER UTILITY G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 4,099.53 13,000.00T-MOBILE USA INC WATER UTILITY BALANCE SHEET GENERAL 600.00-PE PLANS/SPECS ENGINEERING SERVICES 12,400.00 31.59TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 31.59 123,890.79TOWMASTERGENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 123,890.79 165.00TRADEMARK TITLE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 53 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 53Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 165.00 344.50TRANSPORT GRAPHICS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 370.00OPERATIONSGENERAL SUPPLIES 714.50 7,291.40TREE TRUST TREE DISEASE PRIVATE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 7,291.40 2,056.31TRI STATE BOBCAT GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 749.32UNINSURED LOSS G&A UNINSURED LOSS 2,805.63 487.50TUCHMAN, PAUL GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 487.50 60.00TWIN CITIES SIDING PROFESSIONALS INSPECTIONS G & A BUILDING 60.00 3,255.08TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 3,255.08 24,706.24TWIN CITY OUTDOOR SERVICES INC SNOW PLOWING OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,758.00SSD 1 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 7,845.50SSD 3 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 35,309.74 30.00TWIN WEST CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ADMINISTRATION G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 30.00 95.00U S BANK FRANCHISE ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES 95.00 1,240.07UHL CO INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6,531.50FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 163.00COP SHOP REPAIRS 5,145.00PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,184.00MUNICIPAL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 360.00PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 9.26REC CENTER BUILDING BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 18,632.83 City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 54 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 54Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 220.93UNIFORMS UNLIMITED (FIRE)OPERATIONS UNIFORMS 220.93 15.00UNIFORMS UNLIMITED (PD)POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 615.33SUPPORT SERVICES OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 1,381.00SUPERVISORYOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 3,051.08PATROLOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 374.62EXPLORERSOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 3,341.50COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 8,778.53 632.00UNITED WAY OF MINNEAPOLIS AREA EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S UNITED WAY 632.00 85.00UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA PARK MAINTENANCE G & A TRAINING 85.00 1,250.00UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA REGISTRAR INSPECTIONS G & A TRAINING 195.00NATURAL RESOURCES G & A TRAINING 1,445.00 290.00UNO DOS TRES COMMUNICATIONS POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 290.00 11.50US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 11.50 732.51USA BLUE BOOK WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER 732.51 38.60VAIL, LORI HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL SUPPLIES 203.95HUMAN RESOURCES RECOGNITION 217.35HUMAN RESOURCES MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 459.90 8,193.42VALLEY-RICH CO INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 10,000.00SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 18,193.42 240.15VARITECH INDUSTRIES INC SANDING/SALTING EQUIPMENT PARTS City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 55 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 55Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 19,299.90SANDING/SALTING OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 19,540.05 251.64VAUGHAN, JIM NATURAL RESOURCES G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 251.64 60.00VERIFIED CREDENTIALS HUMAN RESOURCES RECRUITMENT 60.00 100.08VERIZON WIRELESS SEWER UTILITY G&A TELEPHONE 22,484.17CELLPHONES, IPADS, ETC.OFFICE EQUIPMENT 140.40CELLPHONES, IPADS, ETC.TELEPHONE 22,724.65 731.98VIKING DISCOUNT BLINDS FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 618.32MUNICIPAL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 1,350.30 99.60VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 99.60 1,021.81VIKING INDUSTRIAL CTR PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 1,021.81 348.00VINZANT PLUMBING HVAC ELECTRICAL & DRAIN WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 348.00 3,450.00VONAPPEN, MARK OPERATIONS GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,450.00 150.00WALSH, CYNTHIA WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 150.00 183.17WALTHER, SEAN HEALTH IN THE PARK INITIATIVE TRAVEL/MEETINGS 785.00COMM DEV PLANNING G & A TRAINING 968.17 51.00WARNER'S STELLIAN CO INSPECTIONS G & A PLUMBING 51.00 359.55WARNING LITES OF MN INC TRAINING SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 56 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 56Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 239.70WATER UTILITY G&A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 119.85PARK MAINTENANCE G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 719.10 4,900.54WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN SOLID WASTE G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 196,436.54SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE 97,636.12SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS RECYCLING SERVICE 5,367.50SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS YARD WASTE SERVICE 88,779.66SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE 393,120.36 2,266.76WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 2,266.76 1,200.00WATSONFACILITIES MCTE G & A OFFICE EQUIPMENT 1,200.00 126.67WAYTEKGENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES 126.67 325.08WEEKS, ETHAN WATER UTILITY G&A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 325.08 94.25WEINBERG SUPPLY CO OPERATIONS REPAIRS 94.25 258.15WELLS CATERING ADMINISTRATION G & A MEETING EXPENSE 258.15 132.84WEST, JASON ORGANIZED REC G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 132.84 5,544.00WESTWOOD SPORTS SOFTBALL GENERAL SUPPLIES 5,544.00 4,236.06WHEELER HARDWARE FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 28,267.61MUNICIPAL BLDG OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES MUNICIPAL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 32,503.67 210.30WHEELER LUMBER LLC PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 57 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 57Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 1,881.60PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 2,091.90 29,790.00WILLMAR WOOD PRODUCTS INC MUNICIPAL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 29,790.00 1,478.67WP & RS MARS COMPANY PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,478.68PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,757.56VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 4,714.91 50.00WRAP CITY GRAPHICS PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 82.50NATURAL RESOURCES G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 82.50BEAUTIFICATION / FLOWERS OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 100.00WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 315.00 6,561.00WSB ASSOC INC ENGINEERING G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 21,707.00STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 28,268.00 410.11WYATT, LISA HOUSING REHAB BALANCE SHEET CONTRACTS PAYABLE 410.11 30,791.82XCEL ENERGY GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE ELECTRIC SERVICE 48.51OPERATIONSEMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 49,363.48PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE 48,414.54WATER UTILITY G&A ELECTRIC SERVICE 4,446.53REILLY BUDGET ELECTRIC SERVICE 3,826.69SEWER UTILITY G&A ELECTRIC SERVICE 2,881.52STORM WATER UTILITY G&A ELECTRIC SERVICE 13,848.85PARK MAINTENANCE G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE 120.53BRICK HOUSE (1324)ELECTRIC SERVICE 107.14WW RENTAL HOUSE (1322)ELECTRIC SERVICE 883.21WESTWOOD G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE 31,370.41REC CENTER BUILDING ELECTRIC SERVICE 186,103.23 1,000.00YOUNG PROPERTY LLC ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 1,000.00 City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 58 3/28/2016CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 6:45:10R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 58Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 3/25/20161/23/2016 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 9,000.00ZAN ASSOCIATES HEALTH IN THE PARK INITIATIVE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 9,000.00 458.00ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC SWEEPING EQUIPMENT PARTS 458.00 19.27ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 21.23WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 38.88PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 116.37VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 195.75 28.75ZEMBRYKI, MARK WESTWOOD G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 28.75 700.00ZIEBART OF MINNESOTA INC GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 700.00 154.71ZIEGLER INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 335.56GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 490.27 331.76ZIP PRINTING COMM & MARKETING G & A PRINTING & PUBLISHING 331.76 54,440.00ZUERCHER TECHNOLOGIES LLC IT G & A COMPUTER SERVICES 23,136.00E-911 PROGRAM COMPUTER SERVICES 87,274.00POLICE & FIRE PENSION G&A MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENT 164,850.00 Report Totals 5,969,894.81 City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 4k) Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 59 Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 4, 2016 Action Agenda Item: 8a EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Bid Tabulation: 2016 Pavement Management and Connect the Park! Project (4016- 1000 & 4016-2000) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to designate Park Construction Company the lowest responsible bidder and authorize execution of a contract with the firm in the amount of $2,743,053.02 for the 2016 Pavement Management and Connect the Park! Project No. 4016-1000. Motion to Adopt Resolution authorizing the installation of “No Parking” restrictions on the north side of 34th Street from Decatur Lane to 415 feet east of Decatur Lane. A simple majority vote (4) is required to approve the two recommended motions. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish to continue to implement our Pavement Management and Connect the Park! program? SUMMARY: Pavement Management and Connect the Park! Project Bid Tabulation A total of three (3) bids were received for this project. A summary of the bid results is as follows: CONTRACTOR BID AMOUNT Park Construction Co. **$2,743,053.02 Northwest Asphalt, Inc. $3,041,510.96 Ryan Contracting Co. $3,409,142.80 Engineer’s Estimate $3,249,124.05 ** Denotes corrected amount A review of the bids indicates Park Construction Company submitted the lowest bid. Park Construction is a reputable contractor. Staff recommends that a contract be awarded to the firm in the amount of $2,743,053.02. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: These projects were planned for and included in the City’s adopted Capital Improvement Program for 2016. This project will be funded by the Pavement Management Fund, Sanitary Sewer Fund, Storm Water Utility Fund, Water Utility Fund, and by Connect the Park! funding sources. Additional funding details are provided in the Discussion section of the report. VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged community. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion Resolution Map and Exhibit Project Location Map Prepared by: Aaron Wiesen, Project Engineer Reviewed by: Debra Heiser, Engineering Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Page 2 Title: Bid Tab: 2016 Pavement Management and Connect the Park! Projects (4016-1000 & 4016-2000) DISCUSSION BACKGROUND: Bids were received on March 24, 2016 for the 2016 Pavement Management and Connect the Park! project. The 2016 construction season will be the twelfth year of implementing the City’s Pavement Management Program and the third year of implementing the City’s Connect the Park! sidewalk initiative. This year’s work, Projects 4016-1000 and 4016-2000, will be performed in Area 5 of the City’s eight pavement management areas. It includes work in the Aquila, Minnehaha and Cobblecrest Neighborhoods. Selection was based on street condition surveys and field evaluations to determine current conditions of the pavement, curb and gutter, and the city’s underground utilities. City staff worked together to select streets and to recommend appropriate rehabilitation techniques for inclusion in this year’s Pavement Management Project. An advertisement for bids was published in the St. Louis Park Sun-Sailor on March 3, 2016. In addition, plans and specifications are noticed on the City Website and are made available electronically via the internet by our vendor QuestCDN.com. Forty seven (47) contractors/vendors purchased plan sets with five Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE) identifying themselves as subcontractors. Funding Details Staff has analyzed the bids and determined that Park Construction Company is a qualified contractor that can complete this work during the 2016 construction season. The low bid does not exceed the funding levels approved for these projects in the City’s 2016 CIP. Based on the low bid received, cost and funding details are as follows: Pavement Management Project No. 4016-1000 2016 CIP Low Bid Construction Cost $2,625,334 $2,216,760.79 Engineering & Administration $338,916 $244,754.21 Total $2,964,250.00 $2,461,515.00 Connect the Park! Project No. 4016-2000 Construction Cost $690,000 $526,292.23 Engineering & Administration $206,000 $105,258.45 Total $896,000.00 $631,550.68 Combined Total $3,093,065.69 Funding Sources Pavement Management Fund $1,679,000 $1,428,198.73 Water Utility $845,250 $614,098.47 Storm Sewer Utility $220,000 $217,205.35 Sanitary Sewer Utility $220,000 $62,412.46 Connect the Park! GO Bonds $896,000 $631,550.68 Fiber (Development Fund) $100,000 $39,600 Fiber (GO Bonds) $100,000 $100,000 Total $3,860,250.00 $3,093,065.69 City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Page 3 Title: Bid Tab: 2016 Pavement Management and Connect the Park! Projects (4016-1000 & 4016-2000) Construction Timeline: Construction is tentatively planned to begin in early May and should be completed by October 2016. Parking Restriction As a part of this project, the city is planning to install a sidewalk on the north side of 34th Street between Decatur Lane and Cavell Lane. This was included as a part of the project approved at the February 29th city council meeting. One of the primary goals of the Connect the Park! initiative is to create a connected network/system of sidewalks, trails and bikeways throughout the City. The Connect the Park! plan indicated sidewalk extending from the southwest up to the northeast corner of the project limits. During design of the segment of sidewalk on 34th Street over the Minnehaha Creek, difficulties were identified with fitting the sidewalk within the corridor and current city right of way. In addition, there is a project to reconstruct the bridge over the creek within the next five years. The reconstruction of the bridge is expected to have significant impacts on the surrounding roadways. For these reasons, staff looked more closely at design options that allow for a safe and continuous sidewalk from the west side of the creek to the east side during the interim time period. Staff is recommending to narrow the road by shifting the north curb line 6 feet south, resulting in a 24 feet road. Then the city is recommending to construct a back of curb style sidewalk in this location. The roadway narrowing will require parking to be restricted to one side of the road only. Staff is recommending that the north side be signed for no parking. The attached map shows the location of the proposed no parking. The parking restriction will be reevaluated during the bridge reconstruction public process. Also attached is an exhibit of what the sidewalk is proposed to look like. City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Page 4 Title: Bid Tab: 2016 Pavement Management and Connect the Park! Projects (4016-1000 & 4016-2000) RESOLUTION NO. 16-____ RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON 34TH STREET WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota has been requested, has studied, and has determined that no parking restrictions on the north side of 34th Street from Decatur Lane to 415 feet east of Decatur Lane need to be installed. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, that: 1. The Engineering Director is hereby authorized install “No Parking” restrictions on the north side of 34th Street from Decatur Lane to 415 feet east of Decatur Lane. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council April 4, 2016 City Manager Mayor Attest: City Clerk City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Page 5 Title: Bid Tab: 2016 Pavement Management and Connect the Park! Projects (4016-1000 & 4016-2000) MAP & EXHIBIT Proposed No Parking on North Side of 34th Proposed No Parking on North Side of 34th 24 Feet View from east side of bridge on 34th Street (Looking West) !!!!!!!! ! ! ! !!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! !! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! !!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!HANNAN LAKE VICTORIA LAKE COBBLE CREST LAKE MINNEHAHA CREEK WESTLING POND MINNEHAHA CREEK WETLANDS SUMTER SEDIMENT BASIN AMHURST ")5 £¤169 ¬«7 TEXASMINNETONKA 29TH BLAKEFREDE RI C K 32ND 34THINDEPENDENCEBOONE32ND 36TH CAVELL AQUILAHILLSBORO 28TH 35THBOONE AQUILA WYOMINGDIVISION 33RD 36TH 37TH S E R V I C E D R H I G H W A Y 7 WALKERWYOMING31ST 34THSUMTER33RD 32 1/2 HILLSBORO31ST SUNSET RIDGEENSIGN29TH 30 1/2 BOONEYUKON31ST 34 1/2 UTAHXYLONENSIGNSUMTERSUMTERGETTYSBURGVIRGINIA31ST ZINRANXYLONYUKONVIRGINIACAMBRIDGECAVELLXYLONVIRGINIAWYOMINGUTAHDECATURFLAGPHILLIPS37TH A Q U I L A A V E S TO W B H W Y 7HILLSBOROCAVEL L 28TH KNOLLWOOD MALL ACCES VIRGINIAMINNEHAHA MINNEHAHA AQUILAAQUILABOONEINDEPENDENCEFLAGVIRGINIAVIRGINIAGETTYSBURGGETTYSBURG AQUI LA AQUILAUTAHGETTYSBURGDECATURT E X A TONKACAVELLSBHWY169STOHWY7HWY7TONBHWY169SWBH W Y 7 TOS B HWY169PRIVA T EPRIVATEPRIVATE2016 Pavement Management & Sidewalk Construction Ü Legend Watermain and Pavement Rehabilitation Pavement Rehabilitation Proposed Sidewalks Existing Sidewalks !!Existing Trails Railroad Lakes Parcels 0 750 1,500 2,250 3,000 Feet 1 inch = 1,000 feet City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 8a) Title: Bid Tab: 2016 Pavement Management and Connect the Park! Projects (4016-1000 & 4016-2000)Page 6 Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 4, 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, and Variance – New Horizons Academy, 2460 Hwy 100 RECOMMENDED ACTION: The following motions are recommended by Staff and the Planning Commission: Motion to Adopt Resolution for a Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Amendment and authorize summary publication. (5 affirmative votes needed to approve.) Motion to approve First Reading of Ordinance amending the Zoning Map to rezone the subject property from Office to Neighborhood Commercial, and set a second reading for April 18, 2016. (4 votes affirmative votes needed for approval) Motion to Adopt Resolution for a variance to allow the outdoor play area to be less than 200 feet from a principal arterial, subject to conditions recommended by Staff. (4 affirmative votes needed for approval) POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the proposal meet the conditions of the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance? SUMMARY: New Horizon Academy (Applicant), intends to purchase the property to open and operate a daycare facility. The Office zoning district does not permit a daycare as a principal use, therefore, the Applicant is requesting the change to C-1 Neighborhood Commercial. The proposal requires the following actions: 1. Amend the comprehensive plan to change the land use map from Office to Commercial. 2. Amend the zoning map to rezone the property from Office to C-1 Neighborhood Commercial. 3. Approve a variance to the C-1 Neighborhood Commercial requirement that a daycare’s outdoor play area be located at least 200 feet from a roadway defined as a principal arterial. Staff finds that the requested Comprehensive Plan Amendment is consistent with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Staff also finds that the requested rezoning of the property is also consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and adjacent zoning districts. The applications were presented to the Planning Commission on March 2. Two neighborhood residents spoke at the public hearing regarding their concerns about existing and increased traffic levels on Utica Ave and Vernon Ave. The Planning Commission recommended approval on a 5-0 vote. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion Resolutions and Ordinance Excerpt of Planning Commission Minutes Aerial Photo Applicant Letter/Development Plans Prepared by: Jeff Miller, HKGi Planning Consultant Reviewed by: Sean Walther, Planning & Zoning Supervisor Michele Schnitker, Housing Supervisor/Deputy CD Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Action Agenda Item: 8b City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Page 2 Title: Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, and Variance – New Horizons Academy, 2460 Hwy 100 DISCUSSION REQUEST: The property is located along Utica Ave, on the frontage road along the west side of Highway 100. It contains a one-story, 10,140 square foot, office building. The applicant, New Horizon Academy, intends to purchase the property to open and operate a daycare facility. The Office zoning district does not permit a daycare as a principal use, but a daycare is a permitted principal use with conditions in the C-1 Neighborhood Commercial district. Approval of the three following applications is required before the existing office building can be used as a daycare facility: 1. Amend the Comprehensive Plan to change the land use map for the subject property from Office to Commercial. 2. Amend the zoning map to rezone the subject property from Office to C-1 Neighborhood Commercial. 3. Approve a variance to the C-1 Neighborhood Commercial requirement that a daycare’s outdoor play area be located a minimum of 200 feet from any roadway defined on the comprehensive plan as a principal arterial. LOCATION: Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation: Office Zoning District: Office Current Land Use: Office City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Page 3 Title: Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, and Variance – New Horizons Academy, 2460 Hwy 100 EXISTING CONDITIONS: The property is 41,356 square feet in area, and contains an existing one-story, 10,140 square foot, office building. Parking spaces are located on the north, west, and south sides of the building. The property is located at the southern edge of the large commercial and industrial area surrounding the intersection of Highway 100 and Cedar Lake Road. Just to the north of the property are the large Luther Volkswagen automobile dealership, an auto body repair business, and the Westside Center. The property also borders a high density residential area to the south. There are two multi-story apartment buildings (Park Ridge Apartments and Courtyard Apartments), and a church directly to the south. There is a parking lot, wetland, and FEMA floodplain to the west. Utica Ave (frontage road) and Highway 100 are to the east with Benilde- St. Margaret’s School directly across Highway 100. PROPOSED DAYCARE: The applicant proposes to remodel the existing building and convert it from an office use to a daycare facility. New Horizon Academy has been searching for a daycare site in St. Louis Park for some time. This property’s location is well positioned to conveniently serve both the employees of the community commercial/industrial center to the north and the residents of the neighborhoods to the south and west. The daycare facility is proposed to have a total licensed occupancy of 168 children. Based upon State licensing requirements, staffing at 100% occupancy would be 21 employees. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT: The zoning of the property must be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Plan. Therefore, the property cannot be rezoned to a commercial zoning district until the Comprehensive Plan designation is changed to Commercial. Below is a portion of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. It shows the subject property guided for Office, which is consistent with the current zoning (O Office). The request to change the land use plan designation from Office to Commercial is consistent with the adjacent properties to the north, which are guided Commercial. City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Page 4 Title: Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, and Variance – New Horizons Academy, 2460 Hwy 100 Goal 4 of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Plan, Commercial & Office Land Use Goals section (page IV-B22), provides this guidance: Preserve and enhance community commercial centers that offer desirable and complementary commercial retail and services for the community’s residents, workers, and visitors. Since this property is located at the southern edge of a community commercial and industrial center that extends from I-394 to Cedar Lake Road and Highway 100, it is appropriate to reguide this property for commercial land uses that complement the commercial and industrial uses to the north, as well as the residential land uses to the south. In contrast, the Comprehensive Plan’s Office land use category is primarily intended for employment centers of fairly intensive office and mixed use development with high floor area ratios (FARs) and building heights. Since this property is relatively small for an office use, isolated from other office development, and adjacent to residential uses, it does not fit the intent of the Office land use category. ZONING ANALYSIS - REZONING: If the Comprehensive Plan land use designation is changed to Commercial, then the property can be rezoned to either the C-1 Neighborhood Commercial district or the C-2 General Commercial district. Since this property is located at the edge of a large community commercial and industrial center and also adjacent to residential uses, the C-1 Neighborhood Commercial district would provide regulations that ensure compatibility with both the commercial uses to the north and residential uses to the south. The purpose of the C-1 Neighborhood Commercial zoning district is stated in the Zoning Ordinance, and reads: “…to provide for low-intensity, service-oriented commercial uses for surrounding residential neighborhoods. Limits will be placed on the type, size, and intensity of commercial uses in this district to ensure and protect compatibility with adjacent residential areas.” The proposed C-1 Neighborhood Commercial zoning district will allow low impact uses, such as a daycare, that are essential and desirable for both employees of the commercial/industrial area to the north and residents of the surrounding neighborhoods. City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Page 5 Title: Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, and Variance – New Horizons Academy, 2460 Hwy 100 As noted above on the excerpt from the zoning map, the two large properties to the north are zoned C-2 General Commercial, so rezoning the subject property to either the C-1 or C-2 district is consistent with the current zoning in the area. The proposed daycare is allowed in both the C-1 and the C-2 districts as a use permitted with conditions. The conditions of approval are identical in both districts, and are as follows: Group care/nursery school. The conditions are as follows: a. A minimum of at least 40 square feet of outside play space per pupil shall be provided and such space shall be enclosed by a fence. b. An off-street passenger loading area shall be provided in order to maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. c. The play area shall be located a minimum of 200 feet from any roadway defined on the comprehensive plan as a principal arterial. In the C-1 and C-2 districts, a daycare can be constructed with a building permit as long as it meets the three conditions above. A conditional use permit, or other public process, is not required. In addition to the conditions above, that are specific to the daycare use, it will also have to meet all other applicable requirements of the zoning ordinance. The Commercial District Regulations require a five foot sidewalk along all street frontages. The subject property does not have a public sidewalk along Utican Ave, and the City sidewalk and trail plan proposes a trail along Utica Ave instead of a sidewalk. Therefore, staff is recommending that an eight foot wide trail be constructed instead of the five foot wide sidewalk. The plan will be amended to reflect the trail, and the notation for the trail and easement is reflected in the variance Resolution. The applicant chose the C-1 district at the city’s request because it is more compatible with neighboring residential uses than the C-2 district. The C-1 district will not allow uses such as liquor stores, pawn shops, outdoor sales, motor vehicle repair, car washes, motor vehicle sales, and high impact sexually-oriented businesses. Comparison of C-1 and O Districts: The table below compares some of the dimensional standards for the C-1 Neighborhood Commercial and O Office districts: Performance Standard C-1 Neighborhood Commercial O Office Height 35 feet 20 stories or 240 feet Setbacks Front 5 feet 20 feet Side None, or same as required side yard for adjacent residential district. 15 feet on one side, half the building height on the other side Rear 20 feet 15 feet City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Page 6 Title: Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, and Variance – New Horizons Academy, 2460 Hwy 100 In addition to the above dimensional standards, there are some differences in allowed uses. The following table lists some of the uses allowed in each district: C-1 Neighborhood Commercial Allowed in Both Districts O Office Animal handling Business trade school Hospital Appliance, small engine repair Printing process Convention hall Food service Studio Hotel/motel Funeral home Service High impact sexually oriented business Adult daycare Group care/nursery school Medical/dental office Museum Office Private entertainment (indoor) Restaurant Retail Parking lots Limited impact sexually oriented business Motor fuel station Educational academic Places of assembly In-vehicle sales & service Parking Regulations: Per the zoning ordinance, a daycare is required to provide one parking space per each two employees, plus one parking space per each ten program participants based on total capacity of the facility. The daycare facility is proposing to have a total licensed occupancy of 168 children. Based upon State licensing requirements, staffing at 100% occupancy would be 21 employees. Thus, the requirement is for 28 off-street parking spaces: 17 based on number of program participants and 11 based on number of employees. The applicant’s site plan proposes to provide 59 parking spaces. It shows 59 spaces because there is a joint parking easement that encumbers 28 of the spaces. The easement is in favor of the apartment building to the south. (The easement is discussed in more detail below.) Therefore, even without the joint parking spaces, the daycare facility is able to provide 31 spaces and meet the minimum parking space requirement of 28 spaces. ZONING ANALYSIS - VARIANCE: Refer to the attached ALTA/ACSM Land Title Survey for a depiction of the proposed parking and outdoor play areas. The applicant is also requesting a variance to one of the three required conditions for a daycare use, which is: The play area shall be located a minimum of 200 feet from any roadway defined on the comprehensive plan as a principal arterial. Since Highway 100 is a principal arterial, this condition is applicable to the property. The applicant has shown the approximate location of a 200’ setback from Highway 100 on their submitted survey. Essentially, the 200’ setback would require all outdoor play areas to be located west of the building. However, City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Page 7 Title: Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, and Variance – New Horizons Academy, 2460 Hwy 100 the property is also encumbered with an existing joint parking and ingress/egress easement, which is also shown on the survey, with the residential property to the south. The joint parking easement involves 28 existing parking spaces (21 spaces in the west parking lot and 7 spaces in the south parking lot). As shown on the survey, the combination of the 200’ setback from Highway 100, the existing joint parking easement that must remain, and the location of the existing building results in inadequate space outside the 200’ setback to provide the required outdoor play areas for the daycare use. The applicant contacted the property owner to the south to discuss making changes to the joint parking and ingress/egress easement in order to increase the amount of space beyond the 200’ setback to accommodate the required outdoor play areas. The residential property owner is not willing to make changes to the joint parking and ingress/egress easement without a significant cost to the applicant. The applicant has located as much of the outdoor play areas outside of the 200’ setback, west of the building, as is reasonably possible. Since the property owner cannot impact the west parking lot, the applicant’s site plan shows outdoor play areas located to the west, north, and south of the building that total 5,758 square feet. As a result, the applicant is requesting a variance for the two portions of the outdoor play areas located on the north and south sides of the building that do not meet the 200’ setback. Below is an analysis of the variance request based on the City’s criteria for granting variances found in Section 36-34 of the Zoning Ordinance. a. The effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community. Locating a portion of the outdoor play area inside the 200’ setback will not negatively affect the health, safety, and welfare of the community. The proposed outdoor play area will be enclosed with a five foot tall steel fence with gates that are remotely controlled and secured with an alarm. In addition to this, there is a concrete wall with a fence on top separating the highway from the daycare facility. The wall and fence is sufficient to prevent children from walking onto the highway. Staff finds this criterion has been satisfied. b. The request is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. The general intent of the required setback is to ensure safety by providing separation between outdoor play areas and principal arterial roadways. The applicant meets the general purpose and intent of the ordinance by locating as much of the play area as is reasonably possible beyond the 200’ setback and behind the building. The masonry wall and fence also enhances the safety for the daycare by ensuring that children cannot walk onto the highway, and that cars cannot veer off the highway and endanger the children or other pedestrians in the area. Staff finds this criterion has been satisfied. c. The request is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan as demonstrated below: City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Page 8 Title: Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, and Variance – New Horizons Academy, 2460 Hwy 100 Section IV, Goal 4 of the Comprehensive Plan states: Preserve and enhance community commercial centers that offer desirable and complementary commercial retail and services for the community’s residents, workers, and visitors. Section F. Plan By Neighborhood – Birchwood Neighborhood Improvement Opportunities states: Control neighborhood cut-through traffic on Utica Avenue Allowing this variance to the setback for the daycare’s outdoor play areas will enable the addition of a daycare that will be desirable and convenient for surrounding residents and employees. The addition of a daycare on this property will not increase cut-through traffic on Utica Avenue over what the neighborhood would experience if the office building were fully occupied with another use. In fact, it may even be reduced if the children are dropped- off by people that already live and work in the area, and therefore, were already driving by the site. Staff finds this criterion has been satisfied. d. There are practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning Ordinance. Practical difficulties are defined as follows: 1. The property owner proposes to use the property for a land use permitted in the zoning district in which the land is located. A variance can be requested for dimensional items required in the zoning ordinance, including but not limited to setbacks and height limitations. In conjunction with this setback variance request, the applicant is requesting that the property be rezoned from O Office to C-1 Neighborhood Commercial, which allows a daycare as a permitted use with conditions. 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. The property is encumbered with an existing joint parking and ingress/egress easement with the residential property to the south. This easement is unique to the property and was not created by the applicant. The existing joint parking and ingress/egress easement encumbers the majority of the open area of the property, resulting in an inadequate space outside the 200’ setback to provide the required outdoor play areas for the daycare use. 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. The variance is being requested to enable reuse of an existing office building for a daycare facility, which will not alter the essential character of the locality. 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. The major consideration for requesting the variance is related to the practical difficulties of using the site and building without impacting the existing joint parking and ingress/egress easement, which involves the entire west parking lot (21 spaces) and the south parking lot (7 spaces). This existing easement on the property limits options for designing the site to meet the setback requirements. City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Page 9 Title: Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, and Variance – New Horizons Academy, 2460 Hwy 100 5. Practical difficulties include inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. This criterion is not applicable. Staff finds that these practical difficulties criteria, as applicable, are met. e. There are circumstances unique to the property including the shape, topography, water conditions, or other physical conditions unique to the property. There are two unique circumstances to this property that relate to the requested variance. The property is encumbered with an existing joint parking and ingress/egress easement with the residential property to the south, which is unique to the property and was not created by the applicant. The 28 joint parking spaces represent approximately half of the property’s existing parking spaces. The existing joint parking and ingress/egress easement, results in inadequate space outside the 200’ setback from a principal arterial roadway to provide the required outdoor play areas for the daycare use. The property’s triangular shape is unique in that it reduces developable area behind the building for parking, and in the case of a daycare facility, outdoor play areas. f. The granting of the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Without the granting of the requested setback variance, the applicant will be unable to use the property for a daycare facility, an allowed use in the C-1 Neighborhood Commercial district. g. The granting of the variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to the adjacent property, unreasonably increase the congestion in the public streets, increase the danger of fire, or endanger public safety. Since the applicant is proposing to use the existing building, granting of the setback variance will not impact light and air to the adjacent property, unreasonably increase traffic, increase the danger of fire, or endanger public safety. Based on the applicant’s proposed maximum occupancy of 168 children and 21 employees for a daycare facility in the existing building, Staff estimates that vehicle trip generation for the daycare use will be very similar to the number of vehicle trips that could be generated by offices uses currently permitted in the building when it is fully occupied. While the character of those trips are different, e.g. more outbound trips on the morning and more inbound trips in the afternoon for a day care facility than an office building, the overall traffic generation is not unreasonably increased. h. The granting of the variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant but is necessary to alleviate a practical difficulty. Without the granting of the requested setback variance, the applicant will not be able to alleviate the practical difficulty of the existing joint parking and ingress/egress easement and the resulting inadequate space for providing the required outdoor play areas for the daycare use. Granting of the variance is necessary for the applicant to use this property for a daycare facility. City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Page 10 Title: Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, and Variance – New Horizons Academy, 2460 Hwy 100 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING: A neighborhood meeting was held at the existing office building on the property on October 8th, 2015. While the meeting was not held for this application, it was held for another daycare use that proposed essentially the same use and layout. Notices were sent to everyone within 500 feet, including residents living in the nearby apartments. The only person that attended the meeting was the neighborhood president, who spoke in favor of the project. The Neighborhood President and the Ward Council Member were notified of the New Horizons application. They expressed some concerns regarding traffic, and staff responded demonstrating that the proposal does not generate more traffic than could be generated by a typical office use locating on this same property. This property could also be more intensely developed under the Office regulations, which allow more intensity that the C-1 Neighborhood Commercial district. A more intense office development could result in even more traffic than could be generated by a daycare. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW: The Planning Commission conducted the public hearing. Two neighborhood residents on Vernon Ave spoke during the public hearing regarding their concerns about existing and increased traffic levels on Utica Ave and Vernon Ave. While both speakers were supportive of a daycare facility use, they feel that the traffic levels on these two streets are already an issue and the daycare facility’s traffic will add to it. They also noted that it is not known currently what kind of traffic will be generated from whatever use locates at the former church site to the south. The Planning Commissioners discussed whether the proposed quantity of outdoor play area space was adequate for the number of kids that would be at the daycare facility. The proposed outdoor play areas actually exceed both city and state requirements for open play area space. Commissioners also discussed whether there is a way to examine traffic in the area and what changes are coming in the future. Staff explained that this change in use doesn’t warrant a traffic study, but in the next two to three years the Comprehensive Plan will be looking at transportation and land uses citywide. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the applications. A copy of the official meeting minutes is attached. City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Page 11 Title: Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, and Variance – New Horizons Academy, 2460 Hwy 100 RESOLUTION NO. 16-____ A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK UNDER MINNESOTA STATUTES 462.351 TO 462.364 2460 State Highway 100 South WHEREAS, the 2030 Comprehensive Plan was adopted by the City Council on December 21, 2009 and provides the following: 1. An official statement serving as the basic guide in making land use, transportation and community facilities and service decisions affecting the City. 2. A framework for policies and actions leading to the improvement of the physical, financial, and social environment of the City, thereby providing a good place to live and work and a setting conducive for new development. 3. A promotion of the public interest in establishing a more functional, healthful, interesting, and efficient community by serving the interests of the community at large rather than the interests of individual or special groups within the community if their interests are at variance with the public interest. 4. An effective framework for direction and coordination of activities affecting the development and preservation of the community. 5. Treatment of the entire community as one ecosystem and to inject long range considerations into determinations affecting short-range action, and WHEREAS, the use of such Comprehensive Plan will insure a safer, more pleasant, and more economical environment for residential, commercial, industrial, and public activities and will promote the public health, safety, and general welfare, and WHEREAS, said Plan will prepare the community for anticipated desirable change, thereby bringing about significant savings in both private and public expenditures, and WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan has taken due cognizance of the planning activities of adjacent units of government, and WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan is to be periodically reviewed by the Planning Commission of the City of St. Louis Park and amendments made, if justified according to procedures, rules, and laws, and provided such amendments would provide a positive result and are consistent with other provisions in the Comprehensive Plan, and WHEREAS, the City received an application on February 1, 2016 to amend the 2030 Comprehensive Plan to change the land use designation from Office to Commercial for the subject property; City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Page 12 Title: Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, and Variance – New Horizons Academy, 2460 Hwy 100 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the application on March 2, 2016, and recommended approval; WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the advice, testimony received at the public hearing, and the recommendation of the Planning Commission (Case No. 16-07-CP); WHEREAS, the contents of Planning Case File No. 16-07-CP are hereby entered into and made part of the record of decision for this case; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of St. Louis Park that the Comprehensive Plan, as previously adopted by the Planning Commission and City Council, is hereby amended as follows: Change the land use designation as shown on the attached map (Exhibit A) from Office to Commercial. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council April 4, 2016 Contingent upon approval of the Metropolitan Council Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Page 13 Title: Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, and Variance – New Horizons Academy, 2460 Hwy 100 Exhibit A City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Page 14 Title: Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, and Variance – New Horizons Academy, 2460 Hwy 100 SUMMARY RESOLUTION NO. 16-____ A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK UNDER MINNESOTA STATUTES 462.351 TO 462.364 2460 State Highway 100 This resolution states that the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map for the subject property will be changed from Office to Commercial. Adopted by the City Council April 4, 2016 Contingent upon approval of the Metropolitan Council Jake Spano /s/ Mayor A copy of the full text of this resolution is available for inspection with the City Clerk. Published in St. Louis Park Sailor: April 14, 2016 City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Page 15 Title: Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, and Variance – New Horizons Academy, 2460 Hwy 100 ORDINANCE NO. ____-16 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ST. LOUIS PARK ORDINANCE CODE CHANGING BOUNDARIES OF ZONING DISTRICTS 2460 State Highway 100 THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK DOES ORDAIN: Section 1. The City Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission (Case No. 16-08-Z). Section 2. The St. Louis Park Zoning Ordinance is hereby further amended by changing the zoning district boundaries by reclassifying the following described lands from O Office to C-1 Neighborhood Commercial: Lot 4, Block 1, RIDGE ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, EXCEPTING THEREFROM, that part of Lot 4, Block 1, RIDGE ADDITION, conveyed in fee to the State of Minnesota by deed dated February 9, 1987, recorded April 10, 1987, as Document No. 5251461. (Abstract Property) Section 3. The contents of Planning Case File 16-08-Z are hereby entered into and made part of the public hearing record and the record of decision for this case. Section 4. The ordinance shall take effect upon Metropolitan Council approval of associated Comprehensive Plan amendment, and not less than 15 days after publication. Public Hearing March 2, 2016 First Reading April 4, 2016 Second Reading April 18, 2016 Date of Publication April 28, 2016 Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Approved as to Form and Execution: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Soren Mattick, City Attorney City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Page 16 Title: Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, and Variance – New Horizons Academy, 2460 Hwy 100 RESOLUTION NO. 16-____ A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE FROM SECTION 36-34 OF THE ORDINANCE CODE RELATING TO ZONING TO THE C-1 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL REQUIREMENT THAT DAYCARE OUTDOOR PLAY AREAS BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF 200 FEET FROM ANY ROADWAY DEFINED ON THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS A PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2460 STATE HIGHWAY 100 SOUTH BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of St. Louis Park, Minnesota: Findings 1. New Horizons Academy has applied for a variance from Section 36-193(c)(2)c of the Ordinance Code relating to zoning that daycare outdoor play areas be located a minimum of 200 feet from any roadway designated in the Comprehensive Plan as a principal arterial for property located in the C-1 Neighborhood Commercial at the following location, to- wit: Lot 4, Block 1, RIDGE ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, EXCEPTING THEREFROM, that part of Lot 4, Block 1, RIDGE ADDITION, conveyed in fee to the State of Minnesota by deed dated February 9, 1987, recorded April 10, 1987, as Document No. 5251461. (Abstract Property) 2. On March 2, 2016, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, received testimony from the public, discussed the application and moved approval of a variance to the C-1 Neighborhood Commercial requirement that a daycare’s outdoor play area be located a minimum of 200 feet from any roadway defined on the Comprehensive Plan as a principal arterial. 3. The Planning Commission has considered the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, the effect on values of property in the surrounding area, and the effect of the proposed variance upon the Comprehensive Plan. 4. Due to conditions on the subject property and surrounding property, it is possible to use the property in such a way that the proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to the adjacent property, unreasonably increase the congestion in the public streets, increase the danger of fire, endanger the public safety, unreasonably diminish or impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. 5. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property and do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which such land is located. The west portion of the property is encumbered with a joint parking and access easement, and the shape is triangular in shape, which limits the amount of area that can be used beyond the 200 foot setback. There is also a wall and fence combination that creates a substantial barrier between the highway from the subject property. City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Page 17 Title: Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, and Variance – New Horizons Academy, 2460 Hwy 100 6. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. It will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty. 7. The contents of Planning Case File 16-09-VAR are hereby entered into and made part of the public hearing record and the record of decision of this case. 8. Under the Zoning Ordinance, this variance shall be deemed to be abandoned, revoked, or canceled if the holder shall fail to complete the work on or before one year after the variance is granted. 9. Under the Zoning Ordinance, this variance shall be revoked and cancelled if the building or structure for which the variance is granted is removed. CONCLUSION The application for the variance to the C-1 Neighborhood Commercial requirement that daycare outdoor play areas be located a minimum of 200 feet from any roadway defined on the comprehensive plan as a principal arterial is granted based on the findings set forth above, and subject to the following conditions: 1. The change to the property’s land use designation on the 2030 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map from Office to Commercial, and approval of the rezoning of the property from Office to C-1 Neighborhood Commercial. 2. The site shall be developed, used and maintained in conformance with the Official Exhibits. 3. An eight foot wide trail shall be constructed along Utica Ave S, and an easement shall be submitted as required. 4. Prior to starting any land disturbing activities, the following conditions shall be met: a. Assent Form and Official Exhibits must be signed by the applicant and property owner(s). b. All necessary permits must be obtained. c. A performance guarantee in the form of cash escrow or irrevocable letter of credit shall be provided to the City of St. Louis Park for all public improvements (sidewalks, utilities, street lights, landscaping, irrigation, etc.) and private site landscaping. 5. The site shall meet all fire lane requirements. The City Clerk is instructed to record certified copies of this resolution in the Office of the Hennepin County Register of Deeds or Registrar of Titles as the case may be. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council April 4, 2016 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Page 18 Title: Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, and Variance – New Horizons Academy, 2460 Hwy 100 EXCERPT OF OFFICIAL MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA MARCH 2, 2016 – 6:00 p.m. COUNCIL CHAMBERS MEMBERS PRESENT: Lynne Carper, Claudia Johnston-Madison, Torrey Kanne, Richard Person, Carl Robertson, Ethan Rickert (youth member) MEMBERS ABSENT: Lisa Peilen, Joe Tatalovich STAFF PRESENT: Sean Walther, Gary Morrison OTHER: Jeff Miller, HKGi Planning Consultant 3. Public Hearings A. Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning and Variance for Proposed Daycare Location: 2460 Highway 100 South Applicant: New Horizon Academy Daycare Case Nos.: 16-07-CP, 16-08-Z, 16-09-VAR Jeff Miller, HKGi Planning Consultant, presented the staff report. He stated that the site currently contains a one-story, 10,140 square foot office building. The applicant proposes to open and operate a daycare facility. Mr. Miller explained how both the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and rezoning from office to commercial are appropriate for the property. Mr. Miller provided a zoning analysis of the variance request to the C-1 Neighborhood Commercial requirement that a daycare’s outdoor play area be located a minimum of 200 feet from any roadway defined on the comprehensive plan as a principal arterial. He showed the site and the proposed outdoor play area. He reviewed how criteria for granting the variance request have been met. Commissioner Robertson asked if it was ever considered to do a text amendment to allow daycare in the Office district. He asked the rationale for not allowing daycare as a principal use. Sean Walther, Planning and Zoning Supervisor, responded that staff was primarily looking to maintain the integrity of the Office district and not wanting existing office spaces to be converted wholly over to daycare use. Office District is seen as an employment center. He said the daycare was seen as an amenity or resource service for employees in that area. Peter Hilger, Rylaur LLC, architect, provided background on New Horizon’s search for a site in St. Louis Park. He said New Horizon is very much looking forward to being in St. Louis Park. City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Page 19 Title: Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, and Variance – New Horizons Academy, 2460 Hwy 100 Commissioner Person spoke about a daycare site he was familiar with which he felt had inadequate outdoor space. He said the site configuration of the proposed outdoor space does not seem adequate for the number of children proposed for the facility. Mr. Hilger said daycare playgrounds are regulated in terms of the number of children who can be outdoors at any given time, related to size and staffing. He spoke about the playground surface material. He said a huge investment is made in the playgrounds in order to satisfy parents’ expectations. Mr. Miller noted that the proposal does exceed both city and state requirements for open play area space. Chair Johnston-Madison opened the public hearing. Kathryn McKeen, 2834 Vernon Ave. S., said she thinks the idea of the daycare sounds pretty good but she is concerned about traffic. She spoke about existing heavy traffic on Vernon Ave. from the apartment building, bus traffic, traffic from the new West End, and fast moving vehicles coming off Hwy. 100 onto Vernon to avoid Hwy. 100. Ms. McKeen said she is concerned about 100 parents driving through her neighborhood at both rush hours. The Chair asked about sidewalk on Vernon Ave. Mr. Walther said sidewalk is intermittent along Utica Avenue which is planned to have a complete trail connection to the regional trail in the future under the city’s sidewalk and trail plan. Sharon Lehrman, 2610 Vernon Ave. S., directly behind the former church, said she has similar concerns related to traffic. Her family uses the frontage road quite frequently because of their location. With all the development in the old Nestle plant area the traffic has greatly increased along the frontage road and in that area, including truck traffic. She said she understood previous interest in daycare at the church site was not pursued by an applicant because of traffic issues and concerns of parents not being able to get in and out easily to drop off and pick up their children during rush hour. Ms. Lehrman said it is not known currently what kind of traffic will be generated from whatever use locates at the former church site. She stated she likes the idea of having a daycare facility but she is very concerned with all the congestion in the area. She spoke about traffic trips predicted by staff. No one else was present wishing to speak. The Chair closed the public hearing. Commissioner Robertson said a reguiding and rezoning to Neighborhood Commercial stands on its own merit for the site. He said he doesn’t have any issues with the variance request because of the elevation differences in the road in question. Chair Johnston-Madison said she understands traffic concerns. She said there will be traffic no matter what goes in there. She asked if there is a way to examine traffic in the area and what is coming in the future. City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Page 20 Title: Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, and Variance – New Horizons Academy, 2460 Hwy 100 Mr. Walther said traffic studies are not warranted unless there is a significant increase in traffic generated by a new use or development. Even the major renovation of the Westside Center did not warrant a traffic study because the former Nestle plant had been among the largest employers in the city. Changeover for that building to the renovation and employment levels it has now is similar to the previous use and the amount traffic generated for that operation. In addition, specifically looking at the proposed daycare site, the office use is one of the highest density/highest intensity uses in the city. He said in many ways this site has already been maximized with the existing 10,000 sq. ft. building, unless structured parking was provided. Longer term the change to Neighborhood Commercial makes sense. He said in the next two to three years the Comprehensive Plan will be looking at transportation and land uses citywide. Commissioner Person said he agreed that it makes sense to rezone the property. He added that he thinks the facility will be crowded inside and outside with 160 children, but that he supports the proposal. Commissioner Carper said the proposal is a good use of the site. Commissioner Robertson made a motion to recommend approval of the Comprehensive Plan amendment, the rezoning, and the variance for proposed daycare at 2460 State Highway 100. Commissioner Carper seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 5-0. City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Page 21 Title: Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, and Variance – New Horizons Academy, 2460 Hwy 100 AERIAL PHOTO Rylaur, LLC philger@rylaur.com 14 Pheasant Lane, North Oaks, MN 55127 612.868.3636 www.rylaur.com - 1 - January 29,2016 Mr. Gary Morrison City of St. Louis Park 5005 Minnetonka Blvd., St Louis Park, MN 55416 RE: Rezoning and Comp Plan Change Request, New Horizon Academy 2460 South Highway100 (Utica Avenue) PID: 31.029.24.23.0012 Dear Mr. Morrison, Please accept this letter, check and related attachments supporting our applications for the following actions: 1. Change the Comprehensive Plan designation from Office to Commercial, and 2. Change the above referenced property zoning from the present Office designation to C-1 Neighborhood Commercial, and 3. Approve a variance to the 200' setback limitation for playground areas Following is our narrative in support of this request. EXISTING CONDITIONS Located on the west side of Highway 100, this existing one story brick office structure is bounded on the east by Highway 100 frontage road, aka Utica Avenue, to the south and west by the Park Crossing Apartments zoned RH, and to the north by the Luther Car dealership zoned General Commercial. Further to the west is Industrial zoned property and flood plains. Across Highway 100 is Benilde St Margaret School. The site contains 41,356 SF total (0.95 acres) and 61 off street parking stalls in a triangular configuration. Of these, a block of 26 stalls, split between the west lot and the south lot are City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Title: Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning & Variance – New Horizons Academy, 2460 Hwy 100 Page 22 Rylaur, LLC philger@rylaur.com 14 Pheasant Lane covered under a joint parking and ac apartments, with very few of the parking lot is also under utilized and may in fact be over parked. Please reference the survey, attached and marked Exhibit A. attached herein and marked Exhibit B, ef weekends (Paragraph 1.02, which states hours of 5PM and 8AM daily Monday through Saturday of use by New Horizon Academy (6AM compatible to the extent these parking stalls are preserved in their present location described in the easement. CROSS PARKING EASEMENT CONFIGURATION AREA LAND USE This site is very close to the Cedar Lake Road/West End development area, and yet also close to the residential neighborhoods to the west and south, well positioned both from a visibility perspective and convenient access to and from work. Aerial Photo of Neighborhood philger@rylaur.com 14 Pheasant Lane, North Oaks, MN 55127 www.rylaur.com - 2 - g and access easement agreement with the Park Crossing , with very few of the stalls consistently used by the apartments. Their existing parking lot is also under utilized and may in fact be over parked. Please reference the survey, attached and marked Exhibit A. The easement document, attached herein and marked Exhibit B, effectively limits the use of these 28 stalls to nights and (Paragraph 1.02, which states ". . .parking . . . shall be limited and restricted to the hours of 5PM and 8AM daily Monday through Saturday . . .), substantially opposite the pattern by New Horizon Academy (6AM-6PM), and therefore their continued joint use is compatible to the extent these parking stalls are preserved in their present location described in CROSS PARKING EASEMENT CONFIGURATION This site is very close to the Cedar Lake Road/West End development area, and yet also close to the residential neighborhoods to the west and south, well positioned both from a visibility perspective and convenient access to and from work. 612.868.3636 Park Crossing Their existing The easement document, also stalls to nights and ". . .parking . . . shall be limited and restricted to the opposite the pattern 6PM), and therefore their continued joint use is compatible to the extent these parking stalls are preserved in their present location described in This site is very close to the Cedar Lake Road/West End development area, and yet also close to the residential neighborhoods to the west and south, well positioned both from a visibility City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Title: Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning & Variance – New Horizons Academy, 2460 Hwy 100 Page 23 Rylaur, LLC philger@rylaur.com 14 Pheasant Lane, North Oaks, MN 55127 612.868.3636 www.rylaur.com - 3 - Aerial View of site and immediate surroundings Rezoning this existing Office use to C-1 Neighborhood Commercial is consistent with good planning standards as it relates common commercial uses adjacent to each other, and this site, with a lesser Neighborhood commercial designation makes for a logical transition from General Commercial to High density residential, and specifically allows the lighter commercial type uses that we are proposing. Current Comprehensive Plan (consistent with current Zoning Designation) City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Title: Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning & Variance – New Horizons Academy, 2460 Hwy 100 Page 24 Rylaur, LLC philger@rylaur.com 14 Pheasant Lane, North Oaks, MN 55127 612.868.3636 www.rylaur.com - 4 - DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES OCCUPANCY New Horizon Academy has long been seeking a site in St. Louis Park. We are proposing to keep the existing structure intact, except the demolition of the attached garage for the benefit of playground space. The building is well suited to a fully functioning childcare center, to include the following breakdown of space and occupants: Three Infant Rooms @ 12 children each: 36 Two Toddler Rooms @ 14 children each: 28 One Toddler transition Room @ 14: 14 Three Preschool Rooms @20 each: 60 One School Age room @ 30: 30 TOTAL LICENSED CHILD OCCUPANCY: 168 Based upon State licensing requirements, staffing at 100% occupancy would be 21 employees, however, industry standard occupancy for childcare centers is around 70%, so the "real" staffing number is approximately 17 employees. PARKING ASSESSMENT Based on the above information, and taking into account the easement impacted stalls that cannot be modified, the parking requirements are summarized as follows: Required based on child count 1/10 children: 17 stalls Required based on staff 21 X 50% 11 stalls Total Parking Required: 28 stalls Existing Parking Stalls (excluding two car garage): 59 stalls Non-Easement Stalls Removed for Play Area: (15) stalls Non-Easement Stalls Removed to improve access: (9) stalls Stalls Remaining (existing and reconfigured): 37 stalls Parking stalls required: (28) stalls Surplus available: 9 stalls Existing Stalls under joint easement to remain: 26 stalls Unrestricted stalls to remain: 9 stalls Per the shared parking easement, we have equivalent and unrestricted rights to the use of these stalls as the apartment does, and in order to preserve them, no playground space is being allocated thereon. Further, the surplus calculation shows that we have 7 additional stalls over what is required. Since the center operates between 6AM and 6PM, and the heaviest drop off traffic period is between 7 and 9 AM, there is little conflict with the shared use of the stalls by New Horizon and the Apartments, which have access Monday through Friday only until 8AM, and many of those parking would likely be off to work themselves by that time. Parking stalls on the south side of the building would be reserved for staff only. Further, to improve vehicle safety and the drop off/pickup of children, we are proposing to eliminate all unrestricted parallel parking stalls on the north side of the driveway, and reposition 9 parking stalls, 9' wide each (6" wider than ordinance requires) as "head-in" stalls adjacent the entrance and sidewalk. The slight curvature, plus a proposed speed bump, will serve as a traffic calming device, effectively slowing traffic as it moves east-west. Access from the western parking stalls would be by sidewalk through the fenced and secured playground, whose gates City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Title: Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning & Variance – New Horizons Academy, 2460 Hwy 100 Page 25 Rylaur, LLC philger@rylaur.com 14 Pheasant Lane, North Oaks, MN 55127 612.868.3636 www.rylaur.com - 5 - will have electronic strikes to enable passage during peak times of drop off and pick-up. Our only challenge might be to get the kids inside rather than staying out to play on the equipment, but at least they would be safe, which is our highest priority. PROPOSED SITE PLAN (Yellow: new play area Green: new landscape area) PLAYGROUND ASSESSMENT Playground space is conveniently, and safely, positioned along the northwest perimeter of the building within direct access from the building and classrooms without crossing the path of traffic to each of a fenced Toddler and Preschool play areas. The ordinance states: "A minimum of 40 square feet of outside play space per pupil shall be provided and such space shall be enclosed by a fence", which under a strict interpretation of all licensed occupant load of the TOTAL occupancy of 168, would be 6,720 SF. Further, infants could reasonably be excluded from this standard as they clearly do not use the play areas to the same degree. Therefore, we have based our calculation on a net occupant load of 168 - 36 infants = 132 children X 40 SF/child = 5,280 SF playground area. We are proposing a total of 5,768 SF, thus in excess of Code requirement. However, the ordinance merely states "per pupil" and does not address "all" pupils at once. New Horizon Academy never operates with all kids on the playground at one time, and therefore defers to a reasonable "class-at-a-time" basis that is fully consistent with State licensing guidelines. Further, per Minnesota Rules regarding licensing, the minimum area for all playgrounds combined is 1,500 sf (MnRules 9503.o155, Subp 7(a)) which we greatly exceed, and the allocation of kids using the play space is 1/75 SF. City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Title: Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning & Variance – New Horizons Academy, 2460 Hwy 100 Page 26 Rylaur, LLC philger@rylaur.com 14 Pheasant Lane, North Oaks, MN 55127 612.868.3636 www.rylaur.com - 6 - We are proposing two playgrounds: the Toddler play area totaling 1,266 SF, licensed for one class use at a time, or 14, yielding a net ratio of 1 child per 92 SF, and the Pre-School Playground are totaling 4,492 SF, licensed for 2 classes at a time, or up to 50 (20+30 or 20+20), resulting in a net ratio of 1/90 SF per child. Since this proposal meets or exceeds State guidelines for licensing, is consistent with the management practices of the center, and can be reasonably interpreted to meet the ordinance standard, we believe this proposal should be approved. Please reference the site plan and building floor plan, attached. VARIANCE REQUEST Within the standards of the C-1 Neighborhood Commercial district (36-193(c)(2)(c), for a nursery school use, "the play area shall be located a minimum of 200' from any roadway defined on the comprehensive plan as a principal arterial " The following diagram indicates the impact of the 200' setback on the particular conditions of this property, including the triangular shape of the lot, the existing easement that must remain, the existing building, and the limit of the remaining 2,820 SF area that can be allocated to play space that meets the ordinance (including demolition of a part of the building), all of which is included in our proposal, representing roughly 49% of the proposed play space of 5,758 SF. We cannot effectively cross the northern driveway to expand the play area since that driveway must remain to serve the two parallel parking spaces currently within the easement, not to mention cutting off the safest access (and lowest traffic volume access) to the center. Therefore, since a dimensional criteria is the grounds for a variance request, we have placed as much possible play space behind the 200' setback as is reasonably possible, and re-crafted the access drive for traffic calming measures and clear drop off zone to effect the safest possible solution within the given sire constraints. SURVEY OVERLAIN WITH EASEMENT AND NET REMAINING PLAY SPACE City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Title: Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning & Variance – New Horizons Academy, 2460 Hwy 100 Page 27 Rylaur, LLC philger@rylaur.com 14 Pheasant Lane, North Oaks, MN 55127 612.868.3636 www.rylaur.com - 7 - Therefore, in order therefore to achieve the required play space, existing surplus parking areas within the 200' limit must be dedicated, and positioned to allow direct access from the classrooms (for safety). For that reason, we are requesting a variance to the ordinance for the remaining 50% within the 200' setback. Considering the intent of the 200' setback, research into the specific origins of this particular provision could not be determined by City staff, but presumably is rooted in public safety, perhaps when a property in question was immediately adjacent to a principal arterial, without any impediments to potential accidents. This particular site is uniquely different, in that a non- arterial street, Utica Avenue in its capacity as a frontage road, is between the principal arterial and our site, and that for most of the playground, the building itself serves the primary barrier to any such perceived danger. Further, there is a concrete retaining wall with a fence atop that physically separated the arterial from Utica. New Horizon Academy considers the safety of its children the highest of priorities. For this, we are planning the following features on this playground: · a 5' high steel fence with alarmed, electronic latches on their gates · fully supervised play time in the same licensing ratios as within the classroom · a vehicle guardrail is planned behind the curb and ahead of the fence wherever the play ground abuts parking or driveways. · a poured rubber fall zone surface Following is our recommended findings for granting the variance: 1. The effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. This variance will not affect the health, safety and welfare of the community. It will instead benefit the community by providing a high quality, safe child care facility in an evolving commercial sector of the city. 2. The request is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the Zoning Ordinance. The granting of this variance is in harmony with the intent of the Zoning Ordinance to provide a safe play environment for our younger citizens. City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Title: Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning & Variance – New Horizons Academy, 2460 Hwy 100 Page 28 Rylaur, LLC philger@rylaur.com 14 Pheasant Lane, North Oaks, MN 55127 612.868.3636 www.rylaur.com - 8 - 3. The request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan This variance request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan in that it permits Child Care within the commercial district. 4. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning Ordinance. This means that: a. The proposed use is permitted in the zoning district in which the land is located. A variance can be requested for dimensional items. This use is permitted in a Commercial district, and the practical difficulty in terms of dimension is that it is impossible to fit the entirety of the play ground beyond the 200' limit, and therefore this fits the context of a dimensional item. b. The plight of the Landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property and not created by the Landowner. This property is effectively limited by the long standing joint parking and access agreement with the adjacent Park Crossing apartments, which enabled that development to meet its parking requirements at the time, and which was presumably approved by the City. Therefore, this is an inherited situation that is not created by this proponent. c. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Granting this variance will not alter the essential character of this area or the site, and in fact will improve the locality with a net reduction in parking and a small addition of green space. d. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. This variance request is clearly not based upon economic conditions as a practical difficulty. This is an expensive proposition for the applicant to make children safe. e. Practical difficulties include inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy applications. This is not a factor in this variance request. 5. There are circumstances unique to the shape, topography, water conditions or other physical conditions of the property. This variance is a direct result of two practical difficulties to achieve this use: the existence of a perpetual cross parking and access easement benefitting the adjacent apartment community, and the triangular shape of the lot with a diminished available area beyond the 200' setback that does not impact the joint parking easement. 6. The granting of the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right. In the absence of this variance, this project cannot proceed. City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Title: Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning & Variance – New Horizons Academy, 2460 Hwy 100 Page 29 Rylaur, LLC philger@rylaur.com 14 Pheasant Lane, North Oaks, MN 55127 612.868.3636 www.rylaur.com - 9 - 7. The granting of the variance will not impair light and air to the surrounding properties, unreasonably increase congestion, increase the danger of fire, or endanger public safety It will not. 8. The granting of the variance will not merely serve as a convenience, but is necessary to alleviate a practical difficulty. This variance is not a convenience, but rather essential to the development of this site into a childcare center to serve the evolving commercial and residential areas surrounding this site, providing a benefit to the community at large.. SUMMARY We respectfully request approval of both the Comp Plan Amendment, the Rezoning to C-1 Neighborhood Commercial, and the granting of the variance to the 200' playground setback, as described herein. · The community will benefit from the presence of a high quality, established and safe child care provider. · We have demonstrated the hardship and practical difficulties of complying with but one provision of the ordinance, and most importantly, have minimized the amount of land impacted by the 200' setback, while providing for a safe play facility that exceeds the State licensing requirements and City ordinance, while exceeding parking requirements. Thank you for your consideration. If you have any additional requirements, please so advise. With Appreciation of Your Assistance, A. Peter Hilger, AIA Architect. encl: Site Plan, Floor Plan, Survey, Cross Parking Easement documentation, Applications for each of Comp Plan change, Zoning Map change and Variance, Check for application fees in the amount of $4,720, address labels. cc: Jill Dunkley, Alan Ruth City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Title: Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning & Variance – New Horizons Academy, 2460 Hwy 100 Page 30 TODDLERPLAYGROUND1,266 S.F.NEW ADA COMPLIANTCURB RAMPEXISTING PARKINGSTALLSNEWLY CONFIGUREDPARKING STALLSPRESCHOOLPLAYGROUND2,780 S.F.TRASHENCL.EXISTING PARKING STALLS7PRESCHOOLPLAYGROUND1,712 S.F.25'-0"22'-0"LANDSCAPINGEXISTING SIDEWALKSCREEN WALLSCREEN WALLLANDSCAPELANDSCAPESIDEWALKTO CONNECT TOPUBLIC WAYCURB RAMP25'-0"BUILDING FOOTPRINT = 10,140 S.F.SPEED BUMP9'-0"9'-0"9'-0"9'-0"9'-0"9'-0"9'-0"8'-0"8'-0"8'-0"SETBACK FROM FENCELINE LOATED BETWEEN UTICA AVE & HWY 100200'-0"200' SETBACK LINESHEET TITLE:DRAFTED:REVIEWED:SHEET DATE:1/31/2016 2:12:46 PMA001SITE PLANJHAPH01.28.16/ 1" = 20'-0"OVERALL SITE PLAN1EXISTING BUILDING FOOTPRINT = 10,140 S.F.Licensed Building Capacity: 168 TotalPlayground Capacity: 168 less 36 infants = 132 ChildrenPlayground Ordinace: 132 Child x 40 SF = 5,280 SF less than 5,758 SF (OK)State Required Minimum Area: 1,500 SF < 5,758 SF (OK)Total Fenced-in Area: 5,758 SF / 75SF Child = 76 ChildrenParking Analysis - Remaining Stalls after Playground Improvements: 36Total req'd stalls for Staff (State Licensing): 21 / 2 = 11 Stalls for staff req'dTotal req'd stalls for Parent/Child (State Licensing): 168 / 10 = 17 StallsTotal Stalls Required: 11 Staff + 17 Parent/Child = 28 TotalTotal Stalls Provided: 37REVISION SCHEDULENODESCRIPTIONDATERYLAUR, LLC.14 PHEASANT LANENORTH OAKS, MN 55127P: 612.868.3636philger@rylaur.com©2015 RYLAUR LLC.NEW HORIZON ACADEMY2460 HWY 100 ST. LOUIS PARKCity Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Title: Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning & Variance – New Horizons Academy, 2460 Hwy 100Page 31 City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Title: Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning & Variance – New Horizons Academy, 2460 Hwy 100 Page 32 LOT 4, BLOCK 1 105.00N69°14'30"W EXCEPTION(perDoc.No.5251461)20.00 197.61 N60°48'44"WN00°30'30"W58.00N 89 °2 9'30"E 3 32 .74 73.23S19°28'55"W130.86S16°27'58"W12.26 208.15S20°45'30"WNONEXCLUSIVE INGRESS/EGRESSEASEMENT PERDOC.NO.5995494 PARCEL 1 PARCEL 222.0022.00P ARKING EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 5995494 148.00 S00°30'30"E19.00S89°29'30"W 36.00 S00°30'30"E102.87128.93Southwest cornerof Lot 4, Block 1,RIDGE ADDITION Northwest corner of Lot 4, Block 1, RIDGE ADDITION PARKINGEASEMENT PERDOC.NO.5995494 SoutheastcornerofLot4,Block1,RIDGEADDITION74.00 31.00 32.3515.26N20°45'30"E63.00S69°14'30"E N20°45'30"E20.00DRAIN AGE AN D UTILITY EAS EMENT PER PLAT OF RIDGE ADDITION 1212O WN ER:TH E LUTHER CO LTD PRNRSHP O WN ER:PARK RIDGE REAL ESTATE LLCOWNER:PARKRIDGEREALESTATELLC'Line2'perDocNo.5251461200.00'Line1'perDocNo.525146138.726.0 26.0 18.5 3 8.8 18.5 38.7 23.51.02.02.02.02.024.953.1 18.5 53.3 2.0 2.0 2.02.041.818.341.5T RAN ? CTV U FLAG EXISTING CURB EXISTINGCURB EXISTING CURB EXISTING CURB EXISTINGSIDEWALK EXI ST IN G SI DEWALKEXISTINGFENCE E XIS TING G AR BAGE EXISTIN G O NE-STO RY BUI LDING EXISTINGSIDEWALKOHP OHP E XIS TING AWNING SURVEY BY :APPROVED BY :DESIGNED BY :DRAWN BY :DATE : SHEET NUMBER PROJECT NUMBERREVISIONDATECHECKED BY :Plot Date: 01/11/2016 - 12:33pmDrawing name: V:\1938\active\193803425\CAD\Dwg\193803425V301.dwgXrefs:St. Paul Office2335 West Highway 36Saint Paul, MN 55113Phone: 651-636-4600Fax: 651-636-1311Website:www.stantec.com193803425NEW HORIZON REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT, LLPALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEYJANUARY 11, 2016 193803425V301DJR V3.01 SAINT LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA2460 SOUTH HIGHWAY 100 CO E C U SS S CTV>>>>>>G ATE VALVE POWER BOX TELEPHONE BOX LIGHT POLE EX. CURB & GUTTER EX. SANITARY SEWER FH EX. WATER MAIN EX. STORM SEWER LOT LINE RIGHT-OF-WAY llCO E C U SS S CAB LE TV BOXCTV SITE PROPERTY LINE BITUMINOUS AREA CONCRETE LEG END POWER BOX TELEPHONE BOX ROAD SIGN MAILBOX LIGHT POLE AERIAL UTILITIES BURIED ELECTRIC BURIED GAS MAIN BOLLARD OHP HA ND HOLEH MAIL E C PARKING METER S I G N PYLON SIGN CABLE TELEVISION T ARN TRANSFORMER CELT CULVERT POWER POLE LAND DESCRIPTION PARCEL 1 Lot 4, Block 1, RIDGE ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, EXCEPTING THEREFROM, that part of Lot 4, Block 1, RIDGE ADDITION, conveyed in fee to the State of Minnesota by deed dated February 9, 1987, recorded April 10, 1987, as Document No. 5251461. (Abstract Property) PARCEL 2 Nonexclusive easement for ingress and egress purposes over part of Lot 3, Block 1, RIDGE ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota, as created in easement agreement dated March 19, 1986, recorded March 24, 1986, as Document No. 5092037, as amended by Amendment N. 1 to Easement Agreement dated August 20, 1992, recorded November 16, 1992, as Document No. 5995494. S UR VEY NOTES 1. The property described hereon is the same as the property described in the title commitment prepared by First American Title Insurance Company National Commercial Services, Issued by its Stone Capital, Commitment No. NCS-752121-PHX1, with an effective date of August 31, 2015 at 7:30 A.M. 2. The bearing system of this survey is ASSUMED as shown per plat of RIDGE ADDITION. 3. Per Item 2 of Table A standards: The property address is 2460 South Highway 100, Saint Louis Park, MN, as stated in said title commitment. 4. Per Item 3 of Table A standards: Subject property is Zoned A per Community Panel Number 27053C0353E, with an effective date of September 2, 2004, per FEMA website. However, per Letter of Map Amendment Determination Document, Case No. 10-05-1847A, dated March 4, 2010, the structure was removed. 5. Per Item 4 of Table A standards: The gross area of subject property contains ±41,356 square feet (±0.95 acres). 6. Per Items 6(a) of Table A standards: Said property is zoned BP - Business Park, per City of St. Louis Park, MN. 7. Per Item 9 of Table A standards: There are 59 total parking spaces on subject property with 3 designated as handicap parking. 8. Per Item 11a of Table A standards: The utilities shown hereon were observed at time of survey. Prior to any digging, contact Gopher State One-Call at 1800-252-1166. Item 10: Rights of State of Minnesota created in Final Certificate recorded September 24, 1941, as Document No. 2108397 and in Partial Final Certificate recorded July 13, 1962, as Document No. 3355542, including limitation of access and right to erect temporary snow fences on lands adjacent to the trunk highway, as assigned, with restrictions and reservations, to City of St Louis Park by Quit Claim Deed dated January 4, 1980, recorded January 18, 1980, as Document No. 4538389. SHOWN ON SURVEY. Item 11: Easements, and rights incidental thereto, in favor of City of St. Louis Park, created in Quit Claim Deed dated May 13, 1960, recorded May 27, 1960, as Document No. 3234888. DOES NOT AFFECT SAID PROPERTY. Item 12: Easements shown on the plat of RIDGE ADDITION, recorded August 10, 1981, as Document No. 4662335. SHOWN ON SURVEY. Item 13: Terms, conditions, and easements, and rights incidental thereto, created in Easement Agreement dated March 19, 1986, as Document No. 5092037, as amended by Amendment No. 1 to Easement Agreement dated August 20, 1992, recorded November 16, 1992, as Document No. 5995494. SHOWN ON SURVEY. CERTIFICATION V ICIN ITY MAPALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY COMMITMENT NO. NCS-752121-PHX1 To New Horizon Real Estate Development, LLP, Associated Bank and Commercial Partners Title, LLC: This is to certify that this map or plat and the survey on which it is based were made in accordance with the 2011 Minimum Standard Detail Requirements for ALTA/ACSM Land Title Surveys, jointly established and adopted by ALTA and NSPS, and includes Items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6(a), 7(a), 8, 9, 11(a), and 13 of Table A thereof. The field work was completed on January 6th, 2016 STANTEC ___________________________________ Daniel J. Roeber, Professional Land Surveyor Minnesota License Number 43133 January 11, 2016 ITEMS CORRESPONDING TO SCHEDULE B PLUG INSCRIBED WITH 43133IRON MONUMENT SET WITH PLASTICDENOTES 1/2 INCH BY 14 INCH DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND 20 400 Horizontal Scale In Feet INTERSTATE 394 HIGHWAY100City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 8b) Title: Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning & Variance – New Horizons Academy, 2460 Hwy 100 Page 33 Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 4, 2016 Action Agenda Item: 8c EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Zero Waste Packaging – Acceptable & Exempt Materials RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to approve the acceptable recyclable and compostable material lists and exempt products as noted in this staff report. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Do the proposed acceptable recyclable and compostable material lists and exempt products meet the intent of the Council when it adopted the Zero Waste Packaging Ordinance? SUMMARY: The Zero Waste Packaging Ordinance was adopted in December 2015 (effective January 1, 2017) and requires food establishments to use reusable, returnable, recyclable, or compostable packaging for food prepared for immediate or take-home consumption. Appropriate recycling or organics recycling receptacles must also be available for customers to discard packaging on-site. As required by the ordinance, staff has developed proposed lists of acceptable recyclable and compostable packaging materials, as well as a list of temporarily acceptable packaging materials (exemptions) for Council’s approval. The process for creating these lists included consulting area material recovery facilities, commercial composting facilities, and stakeholders in the foodservice and solid waste industries. The lists were provided for Council’s review during the March 28, 2016 Study Session and no comments or concerns were expressed. The discussion section of this report provides the lists of suggested acceptable packaging and exempt packaging, as well as a timeline to allow for adequate education to food establishments prior to implementation in 2017. NEXT STEPS: 1. Stakeholder Meeting Presentation of material and exemption lists Mid-April 2016 2. Packaging Fair Informational event for effected businesses May 17, 2016 3. Education/Outreach Informational meetings, site visits, promotion May-December 2016 FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a leader in environmental stewardship. We will increase environmental consciousness and responsibility in all areas of city business. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion Prepared by: Kala Fisher, Solid Waste Program Coordinator Reviewed by: Scott Merkley, Public Works Services Manager Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 8c) Page 2 Title: Zero Waste Packaging – Acceptable & Exempt Materials DISCUSSION BACKGROUND: Council adopted the Zero Waste Packaging ordinance on December 21, 2015 after a yearlong discussion with businesses, residents and experts in the packaging, restaurant, and solid waste industries. The ordinance will go into effect on January 1, 2017. The ordinance will increase traditional recycling and organics recycling by requiring licensed food establishments to use zero waste packaging materials that are either reusable, returnable, recyclable, or compostable when food is prepared on-site for immediate or take home consumption. It will also require food establishments to provide recycling and organics recycling receptacles for food & beverage packaging discarded by customers dining on-site. Prior to the ordinance going into effect, staff must create specific lists of acceptable and exempt packaging materials. These lists will be used for educating food establishments on the requirements of the ordinance. The ordinance requires the following lists to be approved by Council: Acceptable Recyclable Packaging Materials Acceptable Compostable Packaging Materials Temporarily Acceptable Packaging Materials (Exemptions) These lists were provided to Council in a March 28, 2016 Study Session report. No comments or questions were expressed by Council to staff. PRESENT CONSIDERATIONS: Staff developed lists of acceptable and exempt packaging with input from stakeholders in the local restaurant and business trade associations, commercial composting facilities, material recovery facilities, and certifiers of compostable products. The input provided by these stakeholders was valuable in creating the lists below to ensure that food and beverages prepared on-site for immediate or take-home consumption, would be served in packaging that can be recycled or composted through local recycling and composting facilities. Acceptable Recyclable Packaging Materials The following materials meet the definition for “Recyclable Packaging” in subsection 12.202(f)(2) of the ordinance. 1. Plastic packaging: a. Polyethylene Terephthalate (#1 PET or PETE) i. A type of plastic used in clear or colored beverage bottles & food jars b. High Density Polyethylene (#2 HDPE) i. A type of plastic used in milk bottles/jugs c. Polypropylene (#5 PP) i. A type of plastic used in take-out food containers and beverage cups 2. Metal packaging: a. Aluminum foil Typical recyclable packages like glass bottles/jars, aluminum/steel cans, paper milk/juice cartons are not listed because these packaging materials are used for food and beverages that are prepared off-site by manufacturers/distributors. City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 8c) Page 3 Title: Zero Waste Packaging – Acceptable & Exempt Materials Acceptable Compostable Packaging Materials The following materials meet the definition for “Compostable Packaging” in subsection 12.202(f)(3) of the ordinance. 1. Paper Packaging: a. Unlined/uncoated paper products b. Unlined/uncoated butcher paper c. Unlined/uncoated parchment paper d. Wax paper 2. Certified Compostable Packaging (must be BPI or Cedar Grove certified compostable): a. Paper b. Plastic c. Bagasse d. Bamboo Temporarily Acceptable Packaging Materials (Exempt) The following materials do not meet the definitions for “Zero Waste Packaging” in subsection 12.202(f). However, staff recommends temporarily approving an exempt status. 1. Paper food wraps/fast food wrappers until January 1, 2018 Fast food wrappers used by national chains use chemical or plastic lining to stop grease from penetrating the wrapper and therefore are not accepted by local commercial composters. Due to the lack of sufficient alternative products, the exemption status is proposed to allow more time for development of certified compostable alternatives which perform the same function as the current wrappers in use. Staff will revisit this on an annual basis to see if there are other alternatives available. As mentioned above, this is the only 1 year exemption staff is recommending. NEXT STEPS: Once approved, the material lists will be shared with Zero Waste Packaging stakeholders group and used to develop education and outreach materials. These materials will be shared in a variety of ways, including: on the city’s website, e-newsletters, print and media publications, presentations and site visits, and at the May 17 packaging fair being held at Beth El Synagogue. The current timeline should allow national chains time to work out branding details using the required packaging options and allow businesses to use up current stock of non- compliant packaging materials over the next eight months. 1. Stakeholder Meeting Presentation of material and exemption lists Mid-April 2016 2. Packaging Fair Informational event for effected businesses May 17, 2016 3. Education/Outreach Informational meetings, site visits, promotion May-December 2016 Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: April 4, 2016 Action Agenda Item: 8d EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Resolution Approving Annual City Manager Evaluation RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution for formal acceptance of the final City Manager annual evaluation. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does Council wish to formally accept the annual City Manager evaluation? BACKGROUND: On Monday, March 21, 2016, the Council met in a Closed Executive Session to discuss the annual City Manager evaluation. The Mayor will provide a summary of the evaluation results. Approval of this resolution will authorize the City Manager’s annual salary increase to be processed as approved in Resolution 15-203, retroactive to January 1, 2016. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution Prepared by: Ali Timpone, HR Coordinator Reviewed by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of April 4, 2016 (Item No. 8d) Page 2 Title: Resolution Approving Annual City Manager Evaluation RESOLUTION NO. 16-___ RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE ANNUAL CITY MANAGER EVALUATION WHEREAS, the City Council provides an opportunity to hold an annual evaluation of the City Manager; and WHEREAS, on March 21, 2016, a Closed Executive Session of the Council was held to discuss the evaluation; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park hereby accepts the annual evaluation of the City Manager. Additionally, acceptance of the evaluation triggers an annual salary increase for the City Manager retroactive to January 1, 2016 in accordance with Council Resolution 15-203. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council April 4, 2016 City Manager Mayor Attest: City Clerk